Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

2020

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from  to 

Commission file number 0-12820

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia

54-1284688

Virginia54-1284688

(State of incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

628 Main Street, Danville, VA

24541

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

434-792-5111

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $1 par value

AMNB

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 

☐ Yes   þ  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 

☐ Yes   þ  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ

Yes  ☐ No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

þ

Yes  ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Large accelerated filer ☐    ��                   Accelerated filer  þ

☑ 

Non-accelerated filer  ☐                         Smaller reporting company þ

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (12 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)

☐ Yes   þ  No

1

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2019,2020, based on the closing price, was $401,638,000.

$259,004,000.

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding on March 2, 2020February 26, 2021 was 10,965,458.


10,965,502.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement of the Registrant for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 19, 2020,18, 2021, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.


2

CROSS REFERENCE INDEX

PART I

PAGE

ITEM 1

ITEM 1A

ITEM 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

None

ITEM 2

ITEM 3

ITEM 4

PART II

ITEM 5

ITEM 6

ITEM 7

ITEM 7A

ITEM 8

ITEM 9

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

ITEM 9A

ITEM 9B

Other Information

None

PART III

ITEM 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

*

ITEM 11

Executive Compensation

*

ITEM 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

*

ITEM 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

*

ITEM 14

Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

*

PART IV

ITEM 15

ITEM 16

Form 10-K Summary

None

*Certain information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Election of Directors," "Election of Directors – Board Members Serving on Other Publicly Traded Company Boards of Directors," "Election of Directors – Board of Directors and Committees," "Report of the Audit Committee," and "Code of Conduct" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K on executive officers is disclosed herein.

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and "Compensation Committee Report" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the heading "Security Ownership" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Related Party Transactions" and "Election of Directors – Board Independence" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

3


PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of American National Bankshares Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary, American National Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management of the Company and on information available to management at the time these statements and disclosures were prepared. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, estimates, risks, and uncertainties that could cause actual conditions, events, or results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements.

A variety of factors, some of which are discussed in more detail in Item 1A – Risk Factors, may affect the operations, performance, business strategy, and results of the Company. Those factors include but are not limited to the following:

financial market volatility including the level of interest rates could affect the values of financial instruments and the amount of net interest income earned;
general economic or business conditions, either nationally or in the market areas in which the Company does business, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in deteriorating credit quality, reduced demand for credit, or a weakened ability to generate deposits;
competition among financial institutions may increase and competitors may have greater financial resources and develop products and technology that enable those competitors to compete more successfully than the Company;
businesses that the Company is engaged in may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards and tax laws;
the ability to recruit and retain key personnel;
technological risks and developments, and cyber-threats, attacks or events;
the failure of assumptions underlying the allowance for loan losses; and
risks associated with mergers, acquisitions, and other expansion activities.

the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the associated efforts to limit the spread of the virus;

financial market volatility including the level of interest rates, could affect the values of financial instruments and the amount of net interest income earned;

the adequacy of the level of the Company's allowance for loan losses, the amount of loan loss provisions required in future periods, and the failure of assumptions underlying the allowance for loan losses;

general economic or business conditions, either nationally or in the market areas in which the Company does business, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in deteriorating credit quality, reduced demand for credit, or a weakened ability to generate deposits;

competition among financial institutions may increase, and competitors may have greater financial resources and develop products and technology that enable those competitors to compete more successfully than the Company;

businesses that the Company is engaged in may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards and tax laws;

the ability to recruit and retain key personnel;

cybersecurity threats or attacks, the implementation of new technologies, and the ability to develop and maintain reliable and secure electronic systems; and

risks associated with mergers, acquisitions, and other expansion activities.

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

American National Bankshares Inc. is a one-bank holding company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1984. On September 1, 1984, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of American National Bank and Trust Company, a national banking association chartered in 1909 under the laws of the United States. American National Bank and Trust Company is the only banking subsidiary of the Company.

As of December 31, 2019,2020, the operations of the Company are conducted at twenty-six banking offices and one loan production office in Roanoke, Virginia. Through these offices, the Company serves its primary market area of south central Virginia and north central North Carolina. The Bank provides a full array of financial products and services, including commercial, mortgage, and consumer banking; trust and investment services; and insurance. Services are also provided through thirty-eightthirty-seven Automated Teller Machines ("ATMs"), "Online Banking," and "Telephone Banking."

On April 1, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Roanoke-based HomeTown Bankshares Corporation ("HomeTown"). The acquisition of HomeTown deepened the Company’sCompany's footprint in the Roanoke, Virginia metropolitan area and created a presence in the New River Valley with an office in Christiansburg, Virginia.

The Company has two reportable segments, (i) community banking and (ii) trust and investment services. For more financial data and other information about each of the Company’sCompany's operating segments, refer to "Note 24 - Segment and Related Information" of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Competition and Markets

Vigorous competition exists in the Company's service areas. The Company competes not only with national, regional, and community banks, but also with other types of financial institutions including finance companies, mutual and money market fund providers, financial technology companies, brokerage firms, wealth management firms, insurance companies, credit unions, and mortgage companies.

The Company’sCompany's primary market area is south central Virginia and north central North Carolina. The Company also has a significant presence in Roanoke, Virginia that increased substantially in connection with the acquisition of HomeTown. The Company's Virginia banking offices are located in the cities of Danville, Lynchburg, Martinsville, Roanoke, and Salem and in the counties of Campbell, Franklin, Halifax, Henry, Montgomery, Pittsylvania and Roanoke. In North Carolina, the Company's banking offices are located in the cities of Burlington, Graham, Greensboro, Mebane, Raleigh, Winston-Salem, and Yanceyville, which are within the counties of Alamance, Caswell, Forsyth, Guilford, and Guilford. Wake. 

4

The Company has the largest deposit market share in the City of Danville, Virginia. The Company had a deposit market share in the Danville Micropolitan Statistical Area of 36.3%35.5% at June 30, 20192020 based on Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") data. The Company has the second largest deposit market share in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. The Company had a deposit market share in the County of 22.9%27.0% at June 30, 2019,2020, based on FDIC data.

Throughout our

Unemployment levels in each Virginia footprint, employment continuesmarket the Company serves have continued to see positive growthimprove from several business segments, but particularly within the educational,their COVID-19 related highs in early to mid 2020.  Service sectors, financials, medical, manufacturing, construction, timber management and service sectors. The market area has experienced job growth in the manufacturingproduction, and technology area.related businesses have remained strong while hospitality, restaurants, travel & tourism, meeting spaces, and fitness facilities continue to suffer from the COVID-19 restrictions.  Other important business industries include farming, tobacco processing and sales, and food processing, forestry management and lumber production.

processing.  New businesses continue to move into the Company's Virginia footprint, which has been positive for economic growth.

The Company's market area in North Carolina has strong competition in attracting deposits and making loans. Its most direct competition for deposits comes from commercial banks and credit unions located in the market area, including large financial institutions that have greater financial and marketing resources available to them. The Company had a deposit market share in Alamance County of 12.9%14.7% at June 30, 2019,2020, based on FDIC data, which was the third largest of any FDIC-insured institution.

Supervision and Regulation

The Company and the Bank are extensively regulated under federal and state law. The following information describes certain aspects of that regulation applicable to the Company and the Bank and does not purport to be complete. Proposals to change the laws, regulations, and policies governing the banking industry are frequently raised in U.S. Congress, in state legislatures, and before the various bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any changes and the impact such changes might have on the Company and the Bank are impossible to determine with any certainty. A change in applicable laws, regulations or policies, or a change in the way such laws, regulations or policies are interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material impact on the business, operations, and earnings of the Company and the Bank.

American National Bankshares Inc.

American National Bankshares Inc. is qualified as a bank holding company ("BHC") within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHC Act"), and is registered as such with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB"). As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the FRB and is required to file various reports and additional information with the FRB. The Company is also registered under the bank holding company laws of Virginia and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (the "SCC").

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a BHC may elect to become a financial holding company and thereby engage in a broader range of financial and other activities than are permissible for traditional BHC's. In order to qualify for the election, all of the depository institution subsidiaries of the BHC must be well capitalized, well managed, and have achieved a rating of "satisfactory" or better under the Community Reinvestment Act (the "CRA"). Financial holding companies are permitted to engage in activities that are "financial in nature" or incidental or complementary thereto as determined by the FRB. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act identifies several activities as "financial in nature," including insurance underwriting and sales, investment advisory services, merchant banking and underwriting, and dealing or making a market in securities. The Company has not elected to become a financial holding company, and has no plans to become a financial holding company.

American National Bank and Trust Company

American National Bank and Trust Company is a federally chartered national bank and is a member of the Federal Reserve System. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC") and is required to file various reports and additional information with the OCC. The OCC has primary supervisory and regulatory authority over the operations of the Bank. Because the Bank accepts insured deposits from the public, it is also subject to examination by the FDIC.

Depository institutions, including the Bank, are subject to extensive federal and state regulations that significantly affect their business and activities. Regulatory bodies have broad authority to implement standards and initiate proceedings designed to prohibit depository institutions from engaging in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The standards relate generally to operations and management, asset quality, interest rate exposure, and capital. The bank regulatory agencies are authorized to take action against institutions that fail to meet such standards.

As with other financial institutions, the earnings of the Bank are affected by general economic conditions and by the monetary policies of the FRB. The FRB exerts a substantial influence on interest rates and credit conditions, primarily through open market operations in U.S. Government securities, setting the reserve requirements of member banks, and establishing the


discount rate on member bank borrowings. The policies of the FRB have a direct impact on loan and deposit growth and the interest rates charged and paid thereon. They also impact the source, cost of funds, and the rates of return on investments. Changes in the FRB's monetary policies have had a significant impact on the operating results of the Bank and other financial institutions and are expected to continue to do so in the future; however, the exact impact of such conditions and policies upon the future business and earnings cannot accurately be predicted.

The Dodd-Frank Act

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"). The Dodd-Frank Act significantly restructured the financial regulatory regime in the United States and has had a broad impact on the financial services industry as a result of the significant regulatory and compliance changes required under the act. A summary of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act is set forth below:

Increased Capital Standards. The federal banking agencies are required to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for banks and bank holding companies. See "Capital Requirements" below. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act provides for stronger capital standards.

Deposit Insurance. The Dodd-Frank Act made permanent the $250,000 deposit insurance limit for insured deposits. Amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("FDIA") also revised the assessment base against which an insured depository institution's deposit insurance premiums paid to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the "DIF") are calculated. Under the amendments, the assessment base is the institution's average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity during the assessment period. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act made changes to the minimum designated reserve ratio of the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15% to 1.35% of the estimated amount of total insured deposits and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides that depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposits.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"). The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB. The CFPB is charged with establishing rules and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and services.

Compensation Practices. The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the appropriate federal regulators must establish standards prohibiting as an unsafe and unsound practice any compensation plan of a bank holding company or bank that provides an insider or other employee with "excessive compensation" or could lead to a material financial loss to such firm. In June 2010, prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies promulgated the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which requires that financial institutions establish metrics for measuring the impact of activities to achieve incentive compensation with the related risk to the financial institution of such behavior. See "Incentive Compensation" below.

Recent Amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act. The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018, which was signed into law on May 24, 2018 (the "EGRRCPA"), amended the Dodd-Frank Act to provide regulatory relief for certain smaller and regional financial institutions. The EGRRCPA, among other things, provides financial institutions with less than $10 billion in assets with relief from certain capital requirements and exempts banks with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets from the enhanced prudential standards and the company-run and supervisory stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act.

The Dodd-Frank Act has had, and may in the future have, a material impact on the Company’sCompany's operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from new and possible future consumer and fair lending regulations. The future changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may affect the profitability of business activities, require changes to certain business practices, impose more stringent regulatory requirements or otherwise adversely affect the business and financial condition of the Company and the Bank. These changes may also require the Company to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.

Deposit Insurance

The deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the DIF and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. The deposit insurance assessment base of the Bank is based on its average total assets minus average tangible equity, pursuant to a rule issued by the FDIC as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The FDIC uses a "financial ratios method" based on CAMELS composite ratings to determine assessment rates for small established institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as the Bank. The CAMELS rating system is a supervisory rating system designed to take into account and reflect all financial and operational risks that a bank may face, including capital adequacy, asset quality, management capability,


earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk ("CAMELS"). CAMELS composite ratings set a maximum assessment for CAMELS 1 and 2 rated banks, and set minimum assessments for lower rated institutions.

The FDIC’sFDIC's "reserve ratio" of the DIF to total industry deposits reached its 1.15% target effective June 30, 2016. On March 15, 2016, the FDIC implemented by final rule certain Dodd-Frank Act provisions by raising the DIF’sDIF's minimum reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%. The FDIC imposed a 4.5 basis point annual surcharge on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The new rule granted credits to smaller banks for the portion of their regular assessments that contributed to increasing the reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%, to be applied when the reserve ratio reached at least 1.38%. The 1.35% target was achieved in the third quarter of 2018, resulting in the termination of the surcharge. The reserve ratio reached 1.40% as of June 30, 2019, and the FDIC first applied small bank credits on the assessment for the second quarter of 2019, which was invoiced September 30, 2019. The FDIC will continuecontinued to apply the balance of small bank credits as long as thea reserve ratio isof at least 1.35%. Prior was sustained, with the last of the Company's credits being applied to when the new assessment system became effective,for the Bank’s overall rate for assessment calculations was 9 basis points or less,first quarter of 2020, which was within the range of assessment rates for the lowest risk category under the former FDIC assessment rules.invoiced June 30, 2020. In 20192020 and 2018,2019, the Company recorded expense of $119,000$639,000 and $537,000,$119,000, respectively, for FDIC insurance premiums.

In addition, all FDIC insured institutions were required to pay assessments to the FDIC at an annual rate of approximately one basis point of insured deposits to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, an agency of the federal government established to recapitalize the predecessor to the Savings Association Insurance Fund. These assessments continued until the Financing Corporation bonds matured in 2019.

Capital Requirements

The FRB, the OCC and the FDIC have issued substantially similar capital guidelines applicable to all banks and bank holding companies. In addition, those regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company and the Bank became subject to rules implementing the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the "Basel Committee") and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act (the "Basel III Capital Rules"). The Basel III Capital Rules require the Company and the Bank to comply with the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets ("CET1") of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% "capital conservation buffer" (effectively resulting in a minimum CET1 ratio of at least 7%), (ii) a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%), (iii) a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%), and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets. The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until it was fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019.

With respect to the Bank, the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA were also revised, effective as of January 1, 2015, to incorporate a CET1 ratio and to increase certain other capital ratios. To be well capitalized under the revised regulations, a bank must have the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a CET1 ratio of at least 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 8.0%; (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10.0%; and (iv) a leverage ratio of at least 5.0%. See "The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act" below.

The Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted asset ratios of the Company were 12.98%13.78% and 14.04%15.18%, respectively, as of December 31, 2019,2020, thus exceeding the minimum requirements. The CET 1 ratio of the Company was 11.56%12.36% and the Bank was 12.38%12.86% as of December 31, 2019.2020. The Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted asset ratios of the Bank were 12.38%12.86% and 13.06%13.97%, respectively, as of December 31, 2019,2020, also exceeding the minimum requirements.

The Basel III Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. In July 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted final rules (the “Capital"Capital Simplification Rules”Rules") that, among other things, revised these deductions and adjustments. Following the adoption of the Capital Simplification Rules, certain deferred tax assets and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities must be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 25% of CET1. Prior to the adoption of the Capital Simplification Rules, amounts were deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeded 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceeded 15% of CET1. The Capital Simplification Rules took effect for the Company as of January 1, 2020. These limitations did not impact regulatory capital during any of the reported periods.

The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expanded the risk-weighting categories from the general risk-based capital rules to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending


on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures (and higher percentages for certain other types of interests), and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories. In November 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted a rule revising the scope of commercial real estate mortgages subject to a 150% risk weight.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as "Basel IV"). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’sCommittee's standardized approach for credit risk (including by recalibrating risk weights and introducing new capital requirements for certain "unconditionally cancellable commitments," such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the proposed framework, these standards will generally be effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing-in through January 1, 2027. Under the current capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company. The impact of Basel IV on the Company and the Bank will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank regulatory agencies.

On August 28, 2018, the FRB issued an interim final rule required by the EGRRCPA that expands the applicability of the FRB’sFRB's small bank holding company policy statement (the "SBHC Policy Statement") to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of less than $3 billion (up from the prior $1 billion threshold). Under the SBHC Policy Statement, qualifying bank holding companies have additional flexibility in the amount of debt they can issue and are also exempt from the Basel III Capital Rules (subsidiary depository institutions of qualifying bank holding companies are still subject to capital requirements). The Company currently hashad less than $3 billion in total consolidated assets at June 30, 2020 and would likely qualify under the revised SBHC Policy Statement. However, the Company does not currently intend to issue a material amount of debt or take any other action that would cause its capital ratios to fall below the minimum ratios required by the Basel III Capital Rules.

On September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the EGRRCPA that will permitpermits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to be subject to a 9% leverage ratio (commonly referred to as the community bank leverage ratio or "CBLR"). Under the final rule, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of greater than 9% wouldare not be subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules and will beare deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a community bank that falls out of compliance with the framework will havehas a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, provided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the grace period. The CBLR framework willwas first be available for banking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. These CBLR rules were modified in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  See "Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021"below. The Company and the Bank do not currently expect to opt into the CBLR framework.

Dividends

The Company's principal source of cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends to its shareholders, is dividends it receives from the Bank. Statutory and regulatory limitations apply to the Bank's payment of dividends to the Company. As a general rule, the amount of a dividend may not exceed, without prior regulatory approval, the sum of net income in the calendar year to date and the retained net earnings of the immediately preceding two calendar years. A depository institution may not pay any dividend if payment would cause the institution to become "undercapitalized" or if it already is "undercapitalized." The OCC may prevent the payment of a dividend if it determines that the payment would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The OCC also has advised that a national bank should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.

Permitted Activities

As a bank holding company, the Company is limited to managing or controlling banks, furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries, and engaging in other activities that the FRB determines by regulation or order to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In determining whether a particular activity is permissible, the FRB must consider whether the performance of such an activity reasonably can be expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh possible adverse effects. Possible benefits include greater convenience, increased competition, and gains in efficiency. Possible adverse effects include undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, and unsound banking practices. Despite prior approval, the FRB may order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or to terminate ownership or control of any subsidiary when the FRB has reasonable cause to believe that a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company may result from such an activity.


Banking Acquisitions; Changes in Control

The BHC Act requires, among other things, the prior approval of the FRB in any case where a bank holding company proposes to (i) acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any bank or bank holding company (unless it already owns a majority of such voting shares), (ii) acquire all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or (iii) merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, the FRB will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, the public benefits expected to be received from the acquisition, the projected capital ratios and levels on a post-acquisition basis, and the acquiring institution's performance under the CRA and its compliance with fair housing and other consumer protection laws.

Subject to certain exceptions, the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with the applicable regulations, require FRB approval (or, depending on the circumstances, no notice of disapproval) prior to any person or company acquiring "control" of a bank or bank holding company. A conclusive presumption of control exists if an individual or company acquires the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies of an insured depository institution or to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities of any insured depository institution. A rebuttable presumption of control exists if a person or company acquires 10% or more but less than 25% of any class of voting securities of an insured depository institution and either the institution has registered its securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or no other person will own a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the acquisition. The Company's common stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

In addition, Virginia law requires the prior approval of the SCC for (i) the acquisition of more than 5% of the voting shares of a Virginia bank or any holding company that controls a Virginia bank, or (ii) the acquisition by a Virginia bank holding company of a bank or its holding company domiciled outside Virginia.

Source of Strength

FRB policy has historically required bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. The Dodd-Frank Act codified this policy as a statutory requirement. Under this requirement, the Company is expected to commit resources to support the Bank, including at times when the Company may not be in a financial position to provide such resources. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.

Safety and Soundness

There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks by law and regulatory policy that are designed to minimize potential loss to the depositors of such depository institutions and the FDIC insurance fund in the event of a depository institution default. For example, under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, to avoid receivership of an insured depository institution subsidiary, a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of any subsidiary bank that may become "undercapitalized" with the terms of any capital restoration plan filed by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal bank regulatory agency up to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5% of the institution's total assets at the time the institution became undercapitalized or (ii) the amount that is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all applicable capital standards as of the time the institution fails to comply with such capital restoration plan.

Under the FDIA, the federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risk and exposures specified in the guidelines.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), the federal bank regulatory agencies possess broad powers to take prompt corrective action to resolve problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institution is "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," or "critically undercapitalized," as defined by the law. 


Reflecting changes under the new Basel III capital requirements, the relevant capital measures that became effective on January 1, 2015 for prompt corrective action are the total capital ratio, the common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the leverage ratio. A bank will be (i) "well capitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and is not subject to any capital directive order; (ii) "adequately capitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and is not "well capitalized"; (iii) "undercapitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio less than 4.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%; (iv) "significantly undercapitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio less than 3.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%; and (v) "critically undercapitalized" if the institution's tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible assets. An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters. A bank's capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank's overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes. Management believes, as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the Bank met the requirements for being classified as "well capitalized."

As described above, on September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the EGRRCPA that will permitpermits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to opt into the CBLR framework. Banks opting into the CBLR framework and maintaining a CBLR of greater than 9% will beare deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a community bank that falls out of compliance with the framework will havehas a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, provided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the grace period. The CBLR framework willwas first be available for banking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. These CBLR rules were modified in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  See "Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021" below. The Company and the Bank do not currently expect to opt into the CBLR framework.

As required by FDICIA, the federal bank regulatory agencies also have adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards relating to, among other things, internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, and interest rate exposure. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. In addition, the agencies adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, an institution which has been notified that it is not in compliance with safety and soundness standardstandards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, the agency must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized institution is subject under the prompt corrective action provisions described above.

Branching

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, national and state-chartered banks may open an initial branch in a state other than its home state (e.g., a host state) by establishing a de novo branch at any location in such host state at which a bank chartered in such host state could establish a branch. Applications to establish such branches must still be filed with the appropriate primary federal bank regulatory agency and state bank regulatory authorities may require applications or notices.

Transactions with Affiliates

Pursuant to Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W, the authority of the Bank to engage in transactions with related parties or "affiliates" or to make loans to insiders is limited. Loan transactions with an affiliate generally must be collateralized and certain transactions between the Bank and its affiliates, including the sale of assets, the payment of money, or the provision of services, must be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing for comparable nonaffiliated transactions. In addition, the Bank generally may not purchase securities issued or underwritten by affiliates.

Loans to executive officers, directors or to any person who directly or indirectly, or acting through or in concert with one or more persons, owns, controls or has the power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting securities of a bank (a "10% Shareholders"), are subject to Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and their corresponding regulations (Regulation O) and Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act relating to the prohibition on personal loans to executives (which exempts financial institutions in compliance with the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act). Among other things, these loans must be made on terms substantially the same as those prevailing on transactions made to


unaffiliated individuals and certain extensions of credit to those persons must first be approved in advance by a disinterested majority of the entire board of directors. Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act prohibits loans to any of those individuals where the aggregate amount exceeds an amount equal to 15% of an institution's unimpaired capital and surplus plus an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus in the case of loans that are fully secured by readily marketable collateral, or when the aggregate amount on all of the extensions of credit outstanding to all of these persons would exceed the Bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act identifies limited circumstances in which the Bank is permitted to extend credit to executive officers.

Consumer Financial Protection

The Company is subject to a number of federal and state consumer protection laws that extensively govern its relationship with its customers. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Service Members Civil Relief Act, laws governing flood insurance, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices, foreclosure laws, and various regulations that implement some or all of the foregoing. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans and providing other services. If the Company fails to comply with these laws and regulations, it may be subject to various penalties. Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements may also result in failure to obtain any required bank regulatory approval for merger or acquisition transactions the Company may wish to pursue or being prohibited from engaging in such transactions even if approval is not required.

The Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the CFPB, and giving it responsibility for implementing, examining, and enforcing compliance with federal consumer protection laws. The CFPB focuses on (i) risks to consumers and compliance with the federal consumer financial laws, (ii) the markets in which firms operate and risks to consumers posed by activities in those markets, (iii) depository institutions that offer a wide variety of consumer financial products and services, and (iv) non-depository companies that offer one or more consumer financial products or services. The CFPB has broad rule making authority for a wide range of consumer financial laws that apply to all banks, including, among other things, the authority to prohibit "unfair, deceptive or abusive" acts and practices. Abusive acts or practices are defined as those that materially interfere with a consumer's ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service or take unreasonable advantage of a consumer's (i) lack of financial savvy, (ii) inability to protect himself in the selection or use of consumer financial products or services, or (iii) reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer's interests. The CFPB can issue cease-and-desist orders against banks and other entities that violate consumer financial laws. The CFPB may also institute a civil action against an entity in violation of federal consumer financial law in order to impose a civil penalty or injunction.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA requires the appropriate federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the bank's record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the bank, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. Furthermore, such assessment is also required of banks that have applied, among other things, to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of an insured depository institution, or to open or relocate a branch. In the case of a BHC applying for approval to acquire a bank or BHC, the record of each subsidiary bank of the applicant BHC is subject to assessment in considering the application. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve," or "substantial non-compliance." The Bank was rated "satisfactory" in its most recent CRA evaluation.

In December 2019, the FDIC and

On June 5, 2020, the OCC jointly proposed rules that would significantly change existing CRA regulations.published a final rule, effective October 1, 2020, to modernize the agency's regulations under the CRA. The proposed rules are intended to increase bank activity in low- and moderate-income communities where there is significant need for credit, more responsible lending, greater access to banking services, and improvements to critical infrastructure. The proposals change four key areas:rule (i) clarifying whatclarifies which activities qualify for CRA credit;credit and (ii) updatingrequires banks to identify an additional assessment area based on where activities count forthey receive a significant portion of their domestic retail products, thus creating two assessment areas: a deposit-based assessment area and a facility-based assessment area. Further, on November 24, 2020, the OCC issued a proposed rule to establish the agency's proposed approach to determine the CRA credit; (iii) providing a more transparentevaluation measure benchmarks, retail lending distribution test thresholds, and objective method for measuring CRA performance; and (iv) revising CRA-related data collection, record keeping, and reporting.community development minimums under the general performance standards set forth in the June 2020 final rule.  The Company is evaluating what impact this proposednew rule if implemented, maywill have on its operations.

Anti-Money Laundering Legislation

The Company is subject to several federal laws that are designed to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and transactions with persons, companies or foreign governments designated by U.S. authorities ("AML laws"). This category of laws includes the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, and other anti-money launderingthe Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020.

The AML laws and their implementing regulations including the USA Patriot Act of 2001.  Amongrequire insured depository institutions, broker-dealers, and certain other things, thesefinancial institutions to have policies, procedures, and controls to detect, prevent, and report money laundering and terrorist financing. The AML laws and their regulations require the Companyalso provide for information sharing, subject to conditions, between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, for counter-terrorism purposes. Federal banking regulators are required, when reviewing bank holding company acquisition and bank merger applications, to take steps to prevent the use of the Company for facilitating the flow of illegal or illicit money, to report large currency transactions, and to file suspicious activity reports.  The Company is also required to carry out a comprehensive anti-money laundering compliance program.  Violations


can result in substantial civil and criminal sanctions.  In addition, provisions of the USA Patriot Act require the federal bank regulatory agencies to considerinto account the effectiveness of a financial institution'sthe anti-money laundering activities when reviewing bank mergersof the applicants. To comply with these obligations, the Company has implemented appropriate internal practices, procedures, and BHC acquisitions.
controls.

Office of Foreign Assets Control

The U.S. Treasury Department’sDepartment's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") is responsible for administering and enforcing economic and trade sanctions against specified foreign parties, including countries and regimes, foreign individuals and other foreign organizations and entities. OFAC publishes lists of prohibited parties that are regularly consulted by the Company in the conduct of its business in order to assure compliance. The Company is responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of, and transactions with, prohibited parties identified by OFAC, avoiding unlicensed trade and financial transactions with such parties and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence. Failure to comply with OFAC requirements could have serious legal, financial and reputational consequences for the Company.

Privacy Legislation

Several recent laws, including the Right to Financial Privacy Act, and related regulations issued by the federal bank regulatory agencies, also provide new protections against the transfer and use of customer information by financial institutions. A financial institution must provide to its customers information regarding its policies and procedures with respect to the handling of customers' personal information. Each institution must conduct an internal risk assessment of its ability to protect customer information. These privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customer's personal financial information to unaffiliated parties without prior notice and approval from the customer.

customer.

Incentive Compensation

In June 2010, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of financial institutions do not undermine the safety and soundness of such institutions by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of a financial institutions, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a financial institution's incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the institution's ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the financial institution's board of directors.

Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal banking agencies and the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish joint regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities that encourage inappropriate risk-taking by providing an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to the entity. The federal banking agencies issued such proposed rules in March 2011 and issued a revised proposed rule in June 2016 implementing the requirements and prohibitions set forth in Section 956. The revised proposed rule would apply to all banks, among other institutions, with at least $1 billion in average total consolidated assets, like the Bank, for which it would go beyond the existing Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies to (i) prohibit certain types and features of incentive-based compensation arrangements for senior executive officers, (ii) require incentive-based compensation arrangements to adhere to certain basic principles to avoid a presumption of encouraging inappropriate risk, (iii) require appropriate board or committee oversight, (iv) establish minimum recordkeeping, and (v) mandate disclosures to the appropriate federal banking agency. The proposed rules have not yet been finalized.

The FRB will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of financial institutions, such as the Company, that are not "large, complex banking organizations." These reviews will be tailored to each financial institution based on the scope and complexity of the institution's activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the institution's supervisory ratings, which can affect the institution's ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a financial institution if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the institution's safety and soundness and the financial institution is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company had not been made aware of any instances of non-compliance with the final guidance.

11

Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Rule

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB has issued a final rule amending Regulation Z as implemented by the Truth in Lending Act, requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. Mortgage lenders are required to determine consumers' ability to repay in one of two ways. The first alternative requires the mortgage lender to consider the following eight underwriting factors when making the credit decision: (i) current or reasonably expected income or assets; (ii) current employment status; (iii) the monthly payment on the covered transaction; (iv) the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan; (v) the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations; (vi) current debt obligations, alimony, and child support; (vii) the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and (viii) credit history. Alternatively, the mortgage lender can originate "qualified mortgages," which are entitled to a presumption that the creditor making the loan satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements. In general, a "qualified mortgage" is a mortgage loan without negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years. In addition, to be a qualified mortgage the points and fees paid by a consumer cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount. Qualified mortgages that are "higher-priced" (e.g. subprime loans) garner a rebuttable presumption of compliance with the ability-to-repay rules, while qualified mortgages that are not "higher-priced" (e.g. prime loans) are given a safe harbor of compliance. The Company is predominantly an originator of compliant qualified mortgages.

Cybersecurity

In March 2015, federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution’sinstitution's management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’sinstitution's operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If the Company fails to observe the regulatory guidance, it could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.

In December 2020, the federal banking agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would require banking organizations to notify their primary regulator within 36 hours of becoming aware of a "computer-security incident" or a "notification incident." The proposed rule also would require specific and immediate notifications by bank service providers that become aware of similar incidents.

To date, the Company has not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, but its systems and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that the Company could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by the Company and its customers.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("Appropriations Act") was signed into law on December 27, 2020.  Among other things, the CARES Act and Appropriations Act include the following provisions impacting financial institutions:

Community Bank Leverage Ratio.  The CARES Act directed federal banking agencies to adopt interim final rules to lower the threshold under the CBLR from 9% to 8% and to provide a reasonable grace period for a community bank that falls below the threshold to regain compliance, in each case until the earlier of the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020.  In April 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued two interim final rules implementing this directive.  One interim final rule provides that, as of the second quarter 2020, banking organizations with leverage ratios of 8% or greater (and that meet the other existing qualifying criteria) may elect to use the CBLR framework.  It also establishes a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall below the 8% CBLR requirement, so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage ratio of 7% or greater.  The second interim final rule provides a transition from the temporary 8% CBLR requirement to a 9% CBLR requirement.  It establishes a minimum CBLR of 8% for the second through fourth quarters of 2020, 8.5% for 2021, and 9% thereafter, and maintains a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall no more than 100 basis points below the applicable CBLR requirement.

Temporary Troubled Debt Restructurings Relief.  The CARES Act allowed banks to elect to suspend requirements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic (for loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019) that would otherwise be categorized as a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"), including impairment for accounting purposes, until the earlier of 60 days after the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020.  Federal banking agencies are required to defer to the determination of the banks making such suspension.  The Appropriations Act extended this temporary relief until the earlier of 60 days after the termination date of the national emergency or January 1, 2022.

Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program.  The CARES Act created the Small Business Administration ("SBA") Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") and it was extended by the Appropriations Act.  Under the PPP, money was authorized for small business loans to pay payroll and group health costs, salaries and commissions, mortgage and rent payments, utilities, and interest on other debt.  The loans are provided through participating financial institutions, such as the Bank, that process loan applications and service the loans.

Future Legislation and Regulation

Congress may enact legislation from time to time that affects the regulation of the financial services industry, and state legislatures may enact legislation from time to time affecting the regulation of financial institutions chartered by or operating in those states. Federal and state regulatory agencies also periodically propose and adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. The substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulation, or the application thereof, cannot be predicted, although enactment of the proposed legislation could impact the regulatory structure under which the Company and the Bank operate and may significantly increase costs, impede the efficiency of internal business processes, require an increase in regulatory capital, require modifications to business strategy, and limit the ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or the Bank could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company and the Bank.

Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies

The Company's operations are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various regulatory authorities. In particular, the FRB regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates to influence general economic conditions. These policies have a significant impact on overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits; they affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for time and savings deposits. FRB monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks, including the Company, in the past and are expected to do so in the future. As a result, it is difficult for the Company to predict the potential effects of possible changes in monetary policies upon its future operating results.

Tax Reform

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Reform Act"). The legislation made key changes to the U.S. tax law, including the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018.

As a result of the reductionenactment of the CARES Act in 2020, the Company recognized a tax benefit for the net operating loss ("NOL") five-year carryback provision for the NOL acquired in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% under the Tax Reform Act, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 and recognized


a provisional $2.7 million tax expense in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
HomeTown merger.

Employees

At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company employed 355342 full-time equivalent persons. In the opinion of the management of the Company, the relationship with employees of the Company and the Bank is good.

Internet Access to Company Documents

The Company provides access to its Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") filings through a link on the Investor Relations page of the Company's website at www.amnb.com. Reports available at no cost include the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are filed electronically with the SEC. The information on the Company's website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other filing the Company makes with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table lists, as of December 31, 2019,2020, the executive officers of the Company, their ages, and their positions:

Name

Age

Position

NameAgePosition

Jeffrey V. Haley

59

60

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since January 2013. President of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since January 2012. Executive Vice President of the Company from June 2010 to December 2011. Senior Vice President of the Company from July 2008 to May 2010. President of the Bank since June 2010. Executive Vice President of the Bank, as well as President of Trust and Financial Services from July 2008 to May 2010. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank from November 2005 to June 2007.

Jeffrey W. Farrar

59

60

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company since October 2019. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for the Bank since August 2019. Senior Vice President/Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Old Point Financial Corporation from June 2017 to August 2019. Director of Wealth Management, Mortgage and Insurance for Union Bankshares Corporation (now Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation) from January 2014 to June 2017. Chief Financial Officer of StellarOne Corporation and its predecessor companies from January 1996 to June 2017.

H. Gregg Strader

61

62

Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of the Company since January 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of the Bank since January 2014. Executive Vice President of the Bank from June 2013 until December 2013. Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of IBERIABANK Corporation from 2009 to June 2013.

Edward C. Martin

46

47

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company and the Bank and President of Virginia Banking since August 2020. Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Company sincefrom December 2019.2019 until August 2020. Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank sincefrom March 2017.2017 until August 2020. Senior Credit Officer of the Bank from September 2016 until March 2017. Regional Credit Officer of Bank of North Carolina from July 2015 to September 2016. Chief Credit Officer of Valley Bank from June 2007 to June 2015.

John H. Settle, Jr.

61

62

Executive Vice President and President of Trust and Investment Services since October 2016. Senior Vice President and Senior Fiduciary Advisory Specialist with Wells Fargo Private Bank from March 2012 to October 2016. Prior thereto, Managing Director with SunTrust Private Wealth Management.

COVID-19 Impact and Response

In March 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 was recognized as a global pandemic. The spread of the virus has created a global health crisis that has resulted in unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and disruption in financial markets and in governmental, commercial and consumer activity in the United States and globally. Governmental responses have included orders closing businesses not deemed essential and directing individuals to restrict their movements, observe social distancing and shelter in place. These actions, together with responses to the pandemic by all parties, have resulted in rapid decreases in commercial and consumer activity, temporary closures of many businesses that have led to a loss of revenues and a rapid increase in unemployment, disrupted supply chains, market downturns and volatility, changes in consumer behavior, related emergency response legislation and an expectation that the FRB will maintain a low interest rate environment for the foreseeable future.

In response to the outbreak, the Company implemented a business continuity plan and protocols to continue to maintain a high level of care for its employees, customers and communities. The Company also transitioned to a majority of its non-branch employees working remotely and assisting customers by appointment only in branches or directing them to drive-thrus or ATMs. It cancelled all business travel, and it holds all Company meetings through virtual platforms.

In March 2020 (revised in April 2020), the federal banking agencies issued an "Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus." This was in response to the COVID-19 pandemic affecting societies and economies around the world. This guidance encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. The guidance explains that, in consultation with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") staff, the federal banking agencies have concluded that short-term modifications (e.g. six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current as of the implementation date of a relief program are not TDRs. The CARES Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on March 27, 2020. Section 4013 of the CARES Act also addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that COVID-19 related modifications on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 were not TDRs. The Bank implemented a Disaster Assistance Program ("DAP") to provide relief to its borrowers under this guidance. The Bank provided assistance to customers with loan balances of $405.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. The balance of loans remaining in this program at December 31, 2020 was $30.0 million, or 1.5% of the total portfolio, with $18.2 million of the $30.0 million in total deferrals the result of second and third request interest deferrals. At February 28, 2021, the balance of loans remaining in this program was $25.2 million, or 1.2% of the total portfolio, with $16.7 million of the $25.2 million in total deferrals the result of second request interest deferrals. The majority of remaining modifications involved three-month deferments of interest. This interagency guidance has not had a material impact on the Company's financials and is not expected to have a material impact on ongoing operations; however, this impact cannot be quantified at this time.
The CARES Act included an initial first round allocation of $659.0 billion for loans to be issued by financial institutions through the SBA's PPP. PPP loans are forgivable, in whole or in part, if the proceeds are used for payroll and other permitted purposes in accordance with the requirements of the PPP. The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, which was passed by Congress on December 21, 2020 and then signed into law on December 27, 2020 as part of the Appropriations Act, allocated an additional $284.4 billion. These loans carry a fixed rate of 1.00% and a term of two years for the majority of the initial loans and for five years on the second round, if not forgiven, in whole or in part. Payments were deferred for the first six months of the loan. The loans are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. The SBA paid the Bank a processing fee based on the size of the loan. The SBA has approved over 2,700 applications as of  February 28, 2021 totaling $340.9 million in loans. The Company had outstanding net PPP loans of $211.3 million at December 31, 2020 and $226.4 million at February 28, 2021. The Bank has received processing fees of $11.2 million on the PPP loans and incurred direct origination costs of $1.8 million. The Company had net unaccreted PPP loan origination fees of $4.4 million at December 31, 2020 and $5.0 at February 28, 2021. From a funding perspective, the Bank utilized core funding sources for these loans. At December 31, 2020 and February 28, 2021, respectively, the SBA had forgiven $56.4 million and $105.8 million of PPP loans.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to the Company's Business
The Company's business is subject to interest rate risk, and variations in interest rates and inadequate management of interest rate risk may negatively affect financial performance.
Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company's profits.  It is expected that the Company will continue to realize income from the spread between the interest earned on loans, securities, and other interest earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities.  Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between

the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.  In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and the current interest rate environment encourages extreme competition for new loan originations from qualified borrowers.  Management cannot ensure that it can minimize the Company's interest rate risk.
If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, the Company’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Any substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Company faces strong competition from financial services companies and other companies that offer banking and other financial services, which could negatively affect the Company's business.
The Company encounters substantial competition from other financial institutions in its market area.  Ultimately, the Company may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Many competitors offer the same banking services that the Company offers.  These competitors include national, regional, and community banks.  The Company also faces competition from many other types of financial institutions, including finance companies, mutual and money market fund providers, financial technology ("fintech") companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, financial subsidiaries of certain industrial corporations, and mortgage companies.  In particular, competitors include several major financial companies whose greater resources may afford them a marketplace advantage by enabling them to maintain numerous banking locations and ATMs and conduct extensive promotional and advertising campaigns. Increased competition may result in reduced business for the Company.
Additionally, banks and other financial institutions with larger capitalization and financial intermediaries not subject to bank regulatory restrictions have larger lending limits and are thereby able to serve the credit needs of larger customers. These institutions also may have differing pricing and underwriting standards, which may adversely affect the Company through the loss of business or causing a misalignment in the Company’s risk-return relationship. Areas of competition include interest rates for loans and deposits, efforts to obtain loans and deposits, and range and quality of products and services provided, including new technology-driven products and services.  Technological innovation continues to contribute to greater competition in domestic financial services markets as technological advances enable more companies to provide financial services.  If the Company is unable to attract and retain banking customers, it may be unable to continue to grow loan and deposit portfolios and its results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect the Company's business.
The Company's business is directly impacted by economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond the Company's control.  A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by global, national or local events, especially within the Company's market area, could result in potentially negative material consequences such as the following, among others: loan delinquencies increasing; problem assets and foreclosures increasing; demand for products and services decreasing; low cost or noninterest bearing deposits decreasing; and collateral for loans, especially real estate, declining in value, in turn reducing customers' borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans.  Each of these consequences may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Trust division income is a major source of non-interest income for the Company.  Trust and brokerage fee revenue is largely dependent on the fair market value of assets under management and on trading volumes in the brokerage business. General economic conditions and their subsequent effect on the securities markets tend to act in correlation.  When general economic conditions deteriorate, securities markets generally decline in value, and the Company's trust and brokerage fee revenue is negatively impacted as asset values and trading volumes decrease.

CREDIT RISK

The Company's credit standards and its on-going credit assessment processes might not protect it from significant credit losses.

The Company takes credit risk by virtue of making loans and extending loan commitments and letters of credit. The Company manages credit risk through a program of underwriting standards, the review of certain credit decisions and an on-going process of assessment of the quality of the credit already extended. The Company's exposure to credit risk is managed through the use of consistent underwriting standards that emphasize local lending while avoiding highly leveraged transactions as well as excessive industry and other concentrations. The Company's credit administration function employs risk management techniques to help ensure that problem loans are promptly identified. While these procedures are designed to


provide the Company with the information needed to implement policy adjustments where necessary and to take appropriate corrective actions, and have proven to be reasonably effective to date, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in avoiding future undue credit risk.

The Company's focus on lending to small to mid-sized community-based businesses may increase its credit risk.

Most of the Company's commercial business and commercial real estate loans are made to small business or middle market customers. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and have a heightened vulnerability to economic conditions. Additionally, these loans may increase concentration risk as to industry or collateral securing the loans. If general economic conditions in the market areas in which the Company operates negatively impact this important customer sector, the Company's results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. Moreover, a portion of these loans have been made by the Company in recent years, and the borrowers may not have experienced a complete business or economic cycle. The deterioration of the borrowers' businesses may hinder their ability to repay their loans with the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company depends on the accuracy and completeness of information about clients and counterparties, and its financial condition could be adversely affected if it relies on misleading information.

In deciding whether to extend credit or to enter into other transactions with clients and counterparties, the Company may rely on information furnished to it by or on behalf of clients and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information, which the Company does not independently verify. The Company also may rely on representations of clients and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to clients, the Company may assume that a customer's audited financial statements conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP")GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. The Company's financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted to the extent it relies on financial statements that do not comply with GAAP or are materially misleading.

The allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

In accordance with GAAP, an allowance for loan losses is maintained by the Company to provide for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual credit losses, and future provisions for credit losses could materially and adversely affect operating results. The allowance for loan losses is based on prior experience, as well as an evaluation of the risks in the current portfolio. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating, and other outside forces and conditions, including changes in interest rates, all of which are beyond the Company's control; and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal bank regulatory agencies, as a part of their examination process, review the Company's loans and allowance for loan losses. While management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover current losses, it cannot make assurances that it will not further increase the allowance for loan losses or that regulators will not require it to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could adversely affect earnings.

In addition, the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”("ASU") 2016-13, as amended, could result in an increase in the allowance for loan losses as a result of changing from an “incurred loss”"incurred loss" model, which encompasses allowances for current known and inherent losses within the portfolio, to an “expected loss”"expected loss" model, which encompasses allowances for losses expected to be incurred over the life of the portfolio. As a smaller reporting company at the one-time evaluation date, the Company has elected to defer adoption of ASU 2016-13 until January 2023. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Nonperforming assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

The Company's nonperforming assets adversely affect its net income in various ways. The Company does not record interest income on nonaccrual loans, which adversely affects its income and increases credit administration costs. When the Company receives collateral through foreclosures and similar proceedings, it is required to mark the related asset to the then fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, which may, and often does, result in a loss. An increase in the level of nonperforming assets also increases the Company's risk profile and may impact the capital levels regulators believe are appropriate in light of such risks. The Company utilizes various techniques such as workouts, restructurings, and loan sales to manage problem assets. Increases in or negative adjustments in the value of these problem assets, the underlying collateral, or in the borrowers' performance or financial condition, could adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from


management and staff, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities, including generation of new loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will avoid increases in nonperforming loans in the future.

A downturn in the local real estate market could materially and negatively affect the Company's business.

The Company offers a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity lines of credit, consumer and other loans. Many of these loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) located in the Company's market area. A downturn in the real estate market in the areas in which the Company conducts its operations could negatively affect the Company's business because significant portions of its loans are secured by real estate. At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company had approximately $1.8$2.0 billion in loans, of which approximately $1.5 billion (80.9%(75.2%) were secured by real estate. The ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral could then be diminished and the Company would be more likely to suffer losses.

Substantially all of the Company's real property collateral is located in its market area. If there is a decline in real estate values, especially in the Company's market area, the collateral for loans would deteriorate and provide significantly less security.

The Company relies upon independent appraisals to determine the value of the real estate which secures a significant portion of its loans, and the values indicated by such appraisals may not be realizable if the Company is forced to foreclose upon such loans.

A significant portion of the Company's loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate. The Company relies upon independent appraisers to estimate the value of such real estate. Appraisals are only estimates of value and the independent appraisers may make mistakes of fact or judgment which adversely affect the reliability of their appraisals. In addition, events occurring after the initial appraisal may cause the value of the real estate to increase or decrease. As a result of any of these factors, the real estate securing some of the Company's loans may be more or less valuable than anticipated at the time the loans were made. If a default occurs on a loan secured by real estate that is less valuable than originally estimated, the Company may not be able to recover the outstanding balance of the loan and will suffer a loss.

MARKET RISK
The Company's business is subject to interest rate risk, and variations in interest rates and inadequate management of interest rate risk may negatively affect financial performance.

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company's profits. It is expected that the Company is dependentwill continue to realize income from the spread between the interest earned on key personnelloans, securities, and other interest earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affectcurrent interest rate environment encourages extreme competition for new loan originations from qualified borrowers. Management cannot ensure that it can minimize the Company's operations and prospects.interest rate risk.
The Company is a relationship-driven organization. A key aspect of

If the Company’s business strategy is for its senior officers to have primary contact with current and potential customers. The Company’s growth and development are in large part a result of these personalized relationships with the customer base. The success of the Company also often dependsinterest rates paid on its ability to hire and retain qualified banking officers.

The Company’s senior officers have considerable experience in the banking industry and related financial services and are extremely valuable and would be difficult to replace. The loss of the services of these officers could have a material adverse effect upon future prospects. Although the Company has entered into employment contracts with certain of its senior executive officers, and purchased key man life insurance policies to mitigate the risk of an unforeseen departure or death of certain of the senior executive officers, it cannot offer any assurance that theydeposits and other key employees will remain employed byborrowings increase at a faster rate than the Company. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effectinterest rates received on operations and possibly result in reduced revenues.
The inability of the Company to successfully manage its growth or implement its growth strategy may adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future.  In addition, the ability to manage growth successfully depends on whether the Company can maintain adequate capital levels, cost controls and asset quality, and successfully integrate any businesses acquired into the Company.
As the Company continues to implement its growth strategy by opening new branches or acquiring branches or banks, it expects to incur increased personnel, occupancy and other operating expenses.  In the case of new branches, the Company must absorb those higher expenses while it begins to generate new deposits; there is also further time lag involved in redeploying new deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets.  The Company's plans to expand could depress earnings in the short run, even if it efficiently executes a growth strategy leading to long-term financial benefits.

Difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities withinvestments, the Company's own operations may prevent the Company from achieving the expected benefits from acquisitions.
The Company may not be able to achieve fully the strategic objectivesnet interest income, and operating efficiencies expected in an acquisition.  Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired entity.  In addition, the markets and industries in which the Company and its potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive.  The Company may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition; the Company may lose key personnel, either from the acquired entity or from itself; and the Company may not be able to control the incremental increase in noninterest expense arising from an acquisition in a manner that improves its overall operating efficiencies.  These factors could contribute to the Company not achieving the expected benefits from its acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all.  Future business acquisitionstherefore earnings, could be material toadversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the Company and it may issue additional shares of common stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders' ownership interests.  Acquisitions also could require the Company to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt; the Company could therefore become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.
The Company is subject to extensive regulation which could adversely affect its business.
The Company's operations as a publicly traded corporation, a bank holding company, and a parent company to an insured depository institution are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state, and local governmental authorities and are subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictionsinterest rates received on part or all of the Company's operations.  Because the Company's business is highly regulated, the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to it are subject to frequent and sometimes extensive change. Such changes could include higher capital requirements, increased insurance premiums, increased compliance costs, reductions of non-interest income and limitations on services that can be provided.  Actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against the Company could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defend itself and may lead to liability or penalties that materially affect the Company and its shareholders. Any future changes in the laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Company may negatively affect the Company's business and results of operations.
Regulatory capital standards may have an adverse effect on the Company's profitability, lending, and ability to pay dividends on the Company's securities.
The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelinesloans and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amountsinvestments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and types of capital that the Company and the Bank must maintain. From time to time, regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If the Company fails to meet these minimum capital guidelines and/other borrowings. Any substantial, unexpected, or other regulatory requirements, its financial condition would be materially and adversely affected. The Basel III Capital Rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations. While the Company is exempt from these capital requirements under the Federal Reserve’s SBHC Policy Statement, the Bank is not exempt and must comply. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forthprolonged change in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA. Satisfying capital requirements may require the Company to limit its banking operations, retain net income or reduce dividends to improve regulatory capital levels, which could negatively affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Regulations issued by the CFPB could adversely impact earnings due to, among other things, increased compliance costs or costs due to noncompliance.
The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. For example, the CFPB has issued a final rule requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms, or to originate “qualified mortgages” that meet specific requirements with respect to terms, pricing and fees. The rule also contains additional disclosure requirements at mortgage loan origination and in monthly statements. The requirements under the CFPB’s regulations and policies could limit the Company’s ability to make certain types of loans or loans to certain borrowers, or could make it more expensive and/or time consuming to make these loans, which could adversely impact the Company’s profitability.

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.
From time to time, with increasing frequency, there are changes in the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company's financial statements.  These changes can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations.  In some instances, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
Failure to maintain effective systems of internal and disclosure controlmarket interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operationoperations.
 

The Bank may be required to transition from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") index in the future.

In November 2020, the administrator of LIBOR announced it will consult on its intention to extend the retirement date of certain offered rates whereby the publication of the one week and financial condition.

Effective internaltwo month LIBOR offered rates will cease after December 31, 2021; but, the publication of the remaining LIBOR offered rates will continue until June 30, 2023. Given consumer protection, litigation, and disclosure controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfullyreputation risks, federal bank regulators have indicated that entering into new contracts that use LIBOR as a public company.  Ifreference rate after December 31, 2021, would create safety and soundness risks and that they will examine bank practices accordingly. Therefore, the Company cannot provide reliableagencies encouraged banks to cease entering into new contracts that use LIBOR as a reference rate as soon as practicable and in any event by December 31, 2021.

Regulators, industry groups, and others have, among other things, published recommended replacement language for LIBOR-linked financial reports or prevent fraud, its reputationinstruments, identified recommended alternatives for certain LIBOR rates (e.g., the Secured Overnight Financing Rate), and operating results would be harmed.  As partproposed implementations of the Company's ongoing monitoring of internal control, it may discover material weaknesses or significant deficienciesrecommended alternatives in its internal control that require remediation.  A "material weakness"floating rate instruments. There is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statementsnot yet any consensus on what recommendations and proposals will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

broadly accepted.

The Company has ina significant number of loans, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition will change the past discovered,Company's market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and may inpricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with customers could adversely impact the future discover, areas of its internal controls that need improvement.  Even so,Company's reputation. Although the Company is continuingcurrently unable to work to improve its internal controls.  The Company cannotassess what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, certain that these measures will ensure that it implements and maintains adequate controls over its financial processes and reporting in the future.  Any failure to maintain effective controls or to timely effect any necessary improvement ofadequately manage the Company's internal and disclosure controls could, among other things, result in losses from fraud or error, harm the Company's reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in the Company's reported financial information, all of whichtransition could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operationbusiness, financial condition and financial condition.

The carrying value of goodwill may be adversely impacted.
When the Company completes an acquisition, generally goodwill is recorded on the date of acquisition as an asset.  Current accounting guidance requires for goodwill to be tested for impairment, which the Company performs an impairment analysis at least annually, rather than amortizing it over a period of time.  A significant adverse change in expected future cash flows or sustained adverse change in the Company's common stock could require the asset to become impaired.  If impaired, the Company would incur a non-cash charge to earnings that would have a significant impact on the results of operations.  The carrying value

16

LIQUIDITY RISK

The Company may need to raise additional capital in the future to continue to grow, but may be unable to obtain additional capital on favorable terms or at all.

Federal and state banking regulators and safe and sound banking practices require the Company to maintain adequate levels of capital to support its operations. The Company's business strategy calls for it to continue to grow in its existing banking markets (internally and through additional offices) and to expand into new markets as appropriate opportunities arise. Continued growth in the Company's earning assets, which may result from internal expansion and new branch offices, at rates in excess of the rate at which its capital is increased through retained earnings, will reduce the Company's capital ratios. If the Company's capital ratios fell below "well capitalized" levels, the FDIC deposit insurance assessment rate would increase until capital was restored and maintained at a "well capitalized" level. A higher assessment rate would cause an increase in the assessments the Company pays for federal deposit insurance, which would have an adverse effect on the Company's operating results.

Management of the Company believes that its current and projected capital position is sufficient to maintain capital ratios significantly in excess of regulatory requirements for the next several years and allow the Company flexibility in the timing of any possible future efforts to raise additional capital. However, if, in the future, the Company needs to increase its capital to fund additional growth or satisfy regulatory requirements, its ability to raise that additional capital will depend on conditions at that time in the capital markets, economic conditions, the Company's financial performance and condition, and other factors, many of which are outside its control. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital on terms favorable to it or at all. Any future inability to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to the Company may have a material adverse effect on its ability to expand operations, and on its financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

The Bank may be required to transition from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") index in the future.

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority announced that after 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR. As a result, the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. At this time, it is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR. Similarly, it is impossible to predict whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, or what effects any such changes in views or alternatives may have on the markets for LIBOR-indexed financial instruments.
Regulators, industry groups, and others have, among other things, published recommended replacement language for LIBOR-linked financial instruments, identified recommended alternatives for certain LIBOR rates (e.g., the Secured Overnight Financing Rate), and proposed implementations of the recommended alternatives in floating rate instruments. There is not yet any consensus on what recommendations and proposals will be broadly accepted.
The Company has a significant number of loans, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition will change the Company’s market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with customers could adversely impact the Company’s reputation. Although the Company is currently unable to assess what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, failure to adequately manage the transition could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company relies on other companies to provide key components of the Company's business infrastructure.
Third parties provide key components of the Company's business operations such as data processing, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access.  While the Company has selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions.  Any problem caused by these third parties, including those resulting from disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, cybersecurity breaches, failure of a vendor to provide services for any reason or poor performance of services, could adversely affect the Company's ability to deliver products and services to its customers and otherwise conduct its business.  Financial or operational difficulties of a third party vendor could also hurt the Company's operations if those difficulties interface with the vendor's ability to serve the Company.  Replacing these third party vendors could also create significant delay and expense.  Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to the Company's business operations.
The Company's exposure to operational, technological and organizational risk may adversely affect the Company.
The Company is exposed to many types of operational risks, including reputation, legal, and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees or operational errors, clerical or record-keeping errors, and errors resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems.
Negative public opinion can result from the actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, and acquisitions, and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities.  Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company's ability to attract and retain customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.
Certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. The Company's necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transactions may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect.  The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company's (or its vendors') business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

TECHNOLOGY RISK

The Company's operations may be adversely affected by cybersecurity risks.

The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct business. Any failure, interruption, or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Company's internet banking, deposit, loan, and other systems. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of such failure, interruption, or security breach of the Company's information systems, there can be no assurance that they will not occur or, if


they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Further, to access the Company’sCompany's products and services, its customers may use computers and mobile devices that are beyond the Company’sCompany's security control systems. The occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of the Company's communications and information systems could damage the Company's reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Company to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Additionally, the Company outsources its data processing to a third party. If the Company's third party provider encounters difficulties or if the Company has difficulty in communicating with such third party, it will significantly affect the Company's ability to adequately process and account for customer transactions, which would significantly affect its business operations.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company collects and stores sensitive data, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of its customers and employees in systems and on networks. The secure processing, maintenance and use of this information is critical to operations and the Company's business strategy. The Company has invested in accepted technologies, and annually reviews processes and practices that are designed to protect its networks, computers and data from damage or unauthorized access. Despite these security measures, the Company's computer systems and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. A breach of any kind could compromise systems, and the information stored there could be accessed, damaged or disclosed. A breach in security could result in legal claims, regulatory penalties, disruption in operations, and damage to the Company's reputation, which could adversely affect the Company's business. Furthermore, as cyberattacks continue to evolve and increase, the Company may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify or enhance its protective measures, or to investigate and remediate any identified information security vulnerabilities.

Multiple major U.S. retailers, financial institutions, government agencies and departments have experienced data systems incursions reportedly resulting in the thefts of credit and debit card information, online account information, and other financial data of tens of millions of individuals and customers. Retailer incursions affect cards issued and deposit accounts maintained by many financial institutions, including the Bank. Although neither the Company's nor the Bank's systems are breached in government or retailer incursions, these events can cause the Bank to reissue a significant number of cards and take other costly steps to avoid significant theft loss to the Bank and its customers. In some cases, the Bank may be required to reimburse customers for the losses they incur. Other possible points of intrusion or disruption not within the Company's nor the Bank's control include internet service providers, electronic mail portal providers, social media portals, distant-server (so called "cloud") service providers, electronic data security providers, personal computers and mobile phones, telecommunications companies, and mobile phone manufacturers.

Consumers may increasingly decide not to use the Bank to complete their financial transactions because of technological and other changes, which would have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition and operations.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions through alternative methods that historically have involved banks. In particular, the activity of fintech companies has grown significantly over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Fintech companies have and may continue to offer bank or bank-like products and some fintech companies have applied for bank charters. In addition, other fintech companies have partnered with existing banks to allow them to offer deposit products to their customers. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The Company’s risk-management frameworkprocess of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as "disintermediation," could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

OPERATIONAL RISK

The Company is dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affect the Company's operations and prospects.

The Company is a relationship-driven organization. A key aspect of the Company's business strategy is for its senior officers to have primary contact with current and potential customers. The Company's growth and development are in large part a result of these personalized relationships with the customer base. The success of the Company also often depends on its ability to hire and retain qualified banking officers.

The Company's senior officers have considerable experience in the banking industry and related financial services and are extremely valuable and would be difficult to replace. The loss of the services of these officers could have a material adverse effect upon future prospects. Although the Company has entered into employment contracts with certain of its senior executive officers, and purchased key man life insurance policies to mitigate the risk of an unforeseen departure or death of certain of the senior executive officers, it cannot offer any assurance that they and other key employees will remain employed by the Company. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effect on operations and possibly result in reduced revenues.

Failure to maintain effective systems of internal and disclosure control could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operation and financial condition.

Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its reputation and operating results would be harmed. As part of the Company's ongoing monitoring of internal control, it may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in its internal control that require remediation. A "material weakness" is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statements will not be effective in mitigating risk and loss.

prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company maintains an enterprise risk management programhas in the past discovered, and may in the future discover, areas of its internal controls that need improvement. Even so, the Company is designedcontinuing to identify, quantify, monitor, report, and control the riskswork to improve its internal controls. The Company cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that it faces. These risks include, but are not limited to: strategic, interest-rate, credit, liquidity,implements and maintains adequate controls over its financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to maintain effective controls or to timely effect any necessary improvement of the Company's internal and disclosure controls could, among other things, result in losses from fraud or error, harm the Company's reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in the Company's reported financial information, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operation and financial condition.

The carrying value of goodwill may be adversely impacted.

When the Company completes an acquisition, generally goodwill is recorded on the date of acquisition as an asset. Current accounting guidance requires for goodwill to be tested for impairment, which the Company performs an impairment analysis at least annually, rather than amortizing it over a period of time. A significant adverse change in expected future cash flows or sustained adverse change in the Company's common stock could require the asset to become impaired. If impaired, the Company would incur a non-cash charge to earnings that would have a significant impact on the results of operations. The carrying value of goodwill was approximately $85.0 million at December 31, 2020.

The Company relies on other companies to provide key components of the Company's business infrastructure.

Third parties provide key components of the Company's business operations pricing, reputation, compliance, litigationsuch as data processing, recording and cybersecurity.monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access. While the Company assesseshas selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions. Any problem caused by these third parties, including those resulting from disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, cybersecurity breaches, failure of a vendor to provide services for any reason or poor performance of services, could adversely affect the Company's ability to deliver products and improves this programservices to its customers and otherwise conduct its business. Financial or operational difficulties of a third party vendor could also hurt the Company's operations if those difficulties interface with the vendor's ability to serve the Company. Replacing these third party vendors could also create significant delay and expense. Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to the Company's business operations.

LEGAL, REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE RISK

The Company is subject to extensive regulation which could adversely affect its business.

The Company's operations as a publicly traded corporation, a bank holding company, and a parent company to an insured depository institution are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state, and local governmental authorities and are subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictions on an ongoing basis, therepart or all of the Company's operations. Because the Company's business is highly regulated, the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to it are subject to frequent and sometimes extensive change. Such changes could include higher capital requirements, increased insurance premiums, increased compliance costs, reductions of non-interest income and limitations on services that can be no assuranceprovided. Actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against the Company could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defend itself and may lead to liability or penalties that materially affect the Company and its approach and framework for risk management and related controls will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in its business. If conditions or circumstances arise that expose flaws or gapsshareholders. Any future changes in the Company’s risk-management program,laws, rules or if its controls break down,regulations applicable to the Company’sCompany may negatively affect the Company's business and results of operationsoperations.

Regulatory capital standards may have an adverse effect on the Company's profitability, lending, and ability to pay dividends on the Company's securities.

The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that the Company and the Bank must maintain. From time to time, regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If the Company fails to meet these minimum capital guidelines and/or other regulatory requirements, its financial condition maywould be materially and adversely affected.

The Basel III Capital Rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations. While the Company is exempt from these capital requirements under the Federal Reserve's SBHC Policy Statement, the Bank is not exempt and must comply. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA. Satisfying capital requirements may require the Company to limit its banking operations, retain net income or reduce dividends to improve regulatory capital levels, which could negatively affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulations issued by the CFPB could adversely impact earnings due to, among other things, increased compliance costs or costs due to noncompliance.

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. For example, the CFPB has issued a final rule requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms, or to originate "qualified mortgages" that meet specific requirements with respect to terms, pricing and fees. The rule also contains additional disclosure requirements at mortgage loan origination and in monthly statements. The requirements under the CFPB's regulations and policies could limit the Company's ability to make certain types of loans or loans to certain borrowers, or could make it more expensive and/or time consuming to make these loans, which could adversely impact the Company's profitability.

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.

From time to time, with increasing frequency, there are changes in the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company's financial statements. These changes can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some instances, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Current and proposed regulation addressing consumer privacy and data use and security could increase the Company's costs and impact its reputation.

The Company is subject to a number of laws concerning consumer privacy and data use and security, including information safeguard rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. These rules require that financial institutions develop, implement and maintain a written, comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to the financial institution's size and complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution's activities, and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue. The United States has experienced a heightened legislative and regulatory focus on privacy and data security, including requiring consumer notification in the event of a data breach. In addition, most states have enacted security breach legislation requiring varying levels of consumer notification in the event of certain types of security breaches. New regulations in these areas may increase the Company's compliance costs, which could negatively impact earnings. In addition, failure to comply with the privacy and data use and security laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, including by reason of inadvertent disclosure of confidential information, could result in fines, sanctions, penalties or other adverse consequences and loss of consumer confidence, which could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations, overall business, and reputation.


Consumers

The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.

From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to the performance of the Company's fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the performance of the Company's fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company, they may increasingly decide not to useresult in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the Bank to complete theirmarket perception of the Company and its products and services, as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial transactions because of technological and other changes, which wouldliability or reputation damage could have a material adverse impacteffect on the Company's financial condition and operations.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions through alternative methods that historically have involved banks. In particular, the activity of fintech companies has grown significantly over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Fintech companies have and may continue to offer bank or bank-like products and some fintech companies have applied for bank charters. In addition, other fintech companies have partnered with existing banks to allow them to offer deposit products to their customers. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank depositsbusiness, which, in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as "disintermediation," could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of fundsturn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

STRATEGIC RISK

The Company faces strong competition from financial services companies and other companies that offer banking and other financial services, which could negatively affect the Company's business.

The Company encounters substantial competition from other financial institutions in its market area. Ultimately, the Company may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Many competitors offer the same banking services that the Company offers. These competitors include national, regional, and community banks. The Company also faces competition from many other types of financial institutions, including finance companies, mutual and money market fund providers, financial technology ("fintech") companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, financial subsidiaries of certain industrial corporations, and mortgage companies. In particular, competitors include several major financial companies whose greater resources may afford them a marketplace advantage by enabling them to maintain numerous banking locations and ATMs and conduct extensive promotional and advertising campaigns. Increased competition may result in reduced business for the Company.

Additionally, banks and other financial institutions with larger capitalization and financial intermediaries not subject to bank regulatory restrictions have larger lending limits and are thereby able to serve the credit needs of larger customers. These institutions also may have differing pricing and underwriting standards, which may adversely affect the Company through the loss of business or causing a misalignment in the Company's risk-return relationship. Areas of competition include interest rates for loans and deposits, efforts to obtain loans and deposits, and range and quality of products and services provided, including new technology-driven products and services. Technological innovation continues to contribute to greater competition in domestic financial services markets as technological advances enable more companies to provide financial services. If the Company is unable to attract and retain banking customers, it may be unable to continue to grow loan and deposit portfolios and its results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The inability of the Company to successfully manage its growth or implement its growth strategy may adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future. In addition, the ability to manage growth successfully depends on whether the Company can maintain adequate capital levels, cost controls and asset quality, and successfully integrate any businesses acquired into the Company.

As the Company continues to implement its growth strategy by opening new branches or acquiring branches or banks, it expects to incur increased personnel, occupancy and other operating expenses. In the case of new branches, the Company must absorb those higher expenses while it begins to generate new deposits; there is also further time lag involved in redeploying new deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets. The Company's plans to expand could depress earnings in the short run, even if it efficiently executes a growth strategy leading to long-term financial benefits.

Difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities with the Company's own operations may prevent the Company from achieving the expected benefits from acquisitions.

The Company may not be able to achieve fully the strategic objectives and operating efficiencies expected in an acquisition. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired entity. In addition, the markets and industries in which the Company and its potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. The Company may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition; the Company may lose key personnel, either from the acquired entity or from itself; and the Company may not be able to control the incremental increase in noninterest expense arising from an acquisition in a manner that improves its overall operating efficiencies. These factors could contribute to the Company not achieving the expected benefits from its acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all. Future business acquisitions could be material to the Company and it may issue additional shares of common stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders' ownership interests. Acquisitions also could require the Company to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt; the Company could therefore become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

GENERAL RISK

The COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect the Company and the adverse impacts on its business, financial position, and operations could be significant.  The ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created global economic disruptions and disruptions to the lives of people around the world.  Governments, businesses, and the public are taking unprecedented actions to contain the spread of COVID-19 and to mitigate its effects, including quarantines, travel bans, shelter-in-place orders, closures of businesses and schools, fiscal stimulus, and legislation designed to deliver monetary aid and other relief.  While the scope, duration, and full effects are rapidly evolving and not fully known, the pandemic and related efforts to contain it have disrupted global economic activity, adversely affected the functioning of financial markets, impacted interest rates, increased economic and market uncertainty, and disrupted trade and supply chains.  If these effects continue for a prolonged time period or result in sustained economic stress or recession, such effects could have a material adverse impact on it in terms of credit quality, collateral values, ability of customers to repay loans, product demand, funding, operations, interest rate risk and human capital.

Measures enacted to contain the virus, including business shutdowns and shelter-in-place orders along with actions taken by individuals to ensure their safety, have resulted in significant changes to the corporate risk profile.  These actions have led to loss of revenues for the Company's business customers, extreme increases in national and state unemployment, disrupted global supply chains, market downturns and volatility, disruptions in consumer behavior and emergency response legislation, and an expectation that FRB policy will maintain a low interest rate environment for the foreseeable future.  These changes have a significant adverse effect on the markets in which the Company operates and the demand for its products and services.

The Company has taken comprehensive steps to protect the health of its employees and customers by implementing business continuity plan protocols.  For its customers, it has closed branch lobbies but remains open to meet with customers by appointment only and maintained banking hours at branches throughout its footprint.  It has continued to provide financial support to the communities it serves.  For its employees, the Company has cancelled all business travel, enabled approximately 65% of the workforce to work remotely and implemented safety protocols at each location for employees whose role requires they come into the office. These steps have not materially impacted the ability to serve its customers, conduct business or support its employees.  There is no guarantee these actions will be sufficient to successfully mitigate the risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and additional actions may be required.  Future actions deemed necessary by local, state or national leaders could hinder its ability to operate going forward.  Its business operations may be disrupted if key personnel or significant portions of the Company's employees are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic.  The Company's ability to serve its customers could be impacted if actions taken by vendors or business partners are unable to continue providing services the Company depends on.

COVID-19 continues to be a threat to the world.  The extent, severity and duration of the current and future actions are unprecedented and, until normal economic conditions resume, the Company is unable to accurately predict or measure the effects.  For this reason, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affects its business, operations and financial conditions, as well as its regulatory capital and liquidity ratios is highly uncertain and unpredictable and depends on, among other things, new information that may emerge from the actions discussed above to combat the threats posed by the virus. If the pandemic is prolonged, the adverse impact on the markets served and on its business, operations and financial condition could deepen.

Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect the Company's business.

The Company's business is directly impacted by economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond the Company's control. A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by global, national or local events, especially within the Company's market area, could result in potentially negative material consequences such as the following, among others: loan delinquencies increasing; problem assets and foreclosures increasing; demand for products and services decreasing; low cost or noninterest bearing deposits decreasing; and collateral for loans, especially real estate, declining in value, in turn reducing customers' borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans. Each of these consequences may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Trust division income is a major source of non-interest income for the Company. Trust and brokerage fee revenue is largely dependent on the fair market value of assets under management and on trading volumes in the brokerage business. General economic conditions and their subsequent effect on the securities markets tend to act in correlation. When general economic conditions deteriorate, securities markets generally decline in value, and the Company's trust and brokerage fee revenue is negatively impacted as asset values and trading volumes decrease.

The Company's exposure to operational, technological and organizational risk may adversely affect the Company.

The Company is exposed to many types of operational risks, including reputation, legal, and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees or operational errors, clerical or record-keeping errors, and errors resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems.

Negative public opinion can result from the actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, and acquisitions, and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company's ability to attract and retain customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.

Certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. The Company's necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transactions may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company's (or its vendors') business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

The Company's risk-management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and loss.

The Company maintains an enterprise risk management program that is designed to identify, quantify, monitor, report, and control the risks that it faces. These risks include, but are not limited to: strategic, interest-rate, credit, liquidity, operations, pricing, reputation, compliance, litigation and cybersecurity. While the Company assesses and improves this program on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that its approach and framework for risk management and related controls will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in its business. If conditions or circumstances arise that expose flaws or gaps in the Company's risk-management program, or if its controls break down, the Company's results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Negative perception of the Company through media may adversely affect the Company’sCompany's reputation and business.

The Company’sCompany's reputation is critical to the success of its business. The Company believes that its brand image has been well received by customers, reflecting the fact that the brand image, like the Company’s business, is based in part on trust and confidence. The Company’s reputation and brand image could be negatively affected by rapid and widespread distribution of publicity through social and traditional media channels. The Company’s reputation could also be affected by the Company’s association with clients affected negatively through social and traditional media distribution, or other third parties, or by circumstances outside of the Company’s control. Negative publicity, whether deserved or undeserved, could affect the Company’s ability to attract or retain customers, or cause the Company to incur additional liabilities or costs, or result in additional regulatory scrutiny.

The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.
From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to the performance of the Company's fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the performance of the Company's fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of the Company and its products and services, as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, public health issues, and other external events could significantly impact the Company’sCompany's business.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, public health issues, and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Company’sCompany's ability to conduct business. In addition, such events could affect the stability of the Company’sCompany's deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, and/or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. The occurrence of any such event in the future could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sCompany's business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to the Company's Common Stock

RISKS RELATING TO OUR SECURITIES

While the Company's common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, it has less liquidity than stocks for larger companies quoted on a national securities exchange.

The trading volume in the Company's common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market has been relatively low when compared with larger companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or other stock exchanges. There is no assurance that a more active and liquid trading market for the common stock will exist in the future. Consequently, shareholders may not be able to sell a substantial number of shares for the same price at which shareholders could sell a smaller number of shares. In addition, wethe Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of the Company's common stock in the market, or the availability of shares of common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of the common stock.

Economic and other conditions may cause volatility in the price of the Company’sCompany's common stock.

In the current economic environment, the prices of publicly traded stocks in the financial services sector have been volatile. However, even in a more stable economic environment the price of the Company’sCompany's common stock can be affected by


a variety of factors such as expected or actual results of operations, changes in analysts’analysts' recommendations or projections, announcements of developments related to its businesses, operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, news or expectations based on the performance of others in the financial services industry, and expected impacts of a changing regulatory environment. These factors not only impact the price of the Company’sCompany's common stock but could also affect the liquidity of the stock given the Company’sCompany's size, geographical footprint, and industry. The price for shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to the Company’sCompany's performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price for shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock, and the current market price of such shares may not be indicative of future market prices.

Future issuances of the Company's common stock could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could be dilutive.

The Company is not restricted from issuing additional shares of common stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, shares of common stock. Issuances of a substantial number of shares of common stock, or the expectation that such issuances might occur, including in connection with acquisitions by the Company, could materially adversely affect the market price of the shares of the common stock and could be dilutive to shareholders. Because the Company's decision to issue common stock in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors, it cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of possible future issuances of its common stock. Accordingly, the Company's shareholders bear the risk that future issuances will reduce the market price of the common stock and dilute their stock holdings in the Company.

The primary source of the Company's income from which it pays cash dividends is the receipt of dividends from its subsidiary bank.

The availability of dividends from the Company is limited by various statutes and regulations. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other factors, that the OCC could assert that payment of dividends or other payments is an unsafe or unsound practice. In the event the Bank was unable to pay dividends to the Company, or be limited in the payment of such dividends, the Company would likely have to reduce or stop paying common stock dividends. The Company's reduction, limitationlimitation. or failure to pay such dividends on its common stock could have a material adverse effect on the market price of the common stock.

The Company's governing documents and Virginia law contain anti-takeover provisions that could negatively impact its shareholders.

The Company's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and the Virginia Stock Corporation Act contain certain provisions designed to enhance the ability of the Company's Board of Directors to deal with attempts to acquire control of the Company. These provisions and the ability to set the voting rights, preferences and other terms of any series of preferred stock that may be issued, may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may discourage takeovers (which certain shareholders may deem to be in their best interest). To the extent that such takeover attempts are discouraged, temporary fluctuations in the market price of the Company's common stock resulting from actual or rumored takeover attempts may be inhibited. These provisions also could discourage or make more difficult a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest, even though such transactions may be favorable to the interests of shareholders, and could potentially adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2019,2020, the Company maintained twenty-six banking offices. The Company's Virginia banking offices are located in the cities of Danville, Lynchburg, Martinsville, Roanoke, and Salem and in the counties of Campbell, Franklin, Halifax, Henry, Montgomery, Pittsylvania and Roanoke. In North Carolina, the Company's banking offices are located in the cities of Burlington, Graham, Greensboro, Mebane, Raleigh, Winston-Salem, and Yanceyville, which are within the counties of Alamance, Caswell, Forsyth, Guilford, and Guilford.Wake. The Company also operates one loan production office.

The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 628 Main Street in the business district of Danville, Virginia. This building, owned by the Company, has three floors totaling approximately 27,000 square feet.

The Company owns a building located at 103 Tower Drive in Danville, Virginia. This three-story facility serves as an operations center.

The Company has an office at 445 Mount Cross Road in Danville, Virginia, where it consolidated two banking offices in January 2009 and gained additional administrative space.


The Company leases certain space located at 202 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia as a result of the merger with HomeTown. This office serves as the Virginia banking headquarters and the center for its corporate credit function.

The Company leases an office at 703 Green Valley Road in Greensboro, North Carolina. This building serves as the head office for the Company's North Carolina banking headquarters.

The Company owns twenty other offices for a total of twenty-three owned buildings. There are no mortgages or liens against any of the properties owned by the Company. The Company operates thirty-eightthirty-seven ATMs on owned or leased facilities.  The Company leases five other offices for a total of seven leased office locations and leases one storage warehouse.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of operations, the Company and the Bank are parties to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

23

None.

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market and Dividend Information

The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "AMNB." At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company had 3,8823,857 shareholders of record. 

The Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.25 per share for the first and second quarters and $0.27 per share for the third and fourth quarterseach quarter of 2019.2020. The Company’sCompany's future dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the Boards of Directors of the Company and the Bank and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and general business conditions. The Company and the Bank are also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the reserve and capital requirements of federal and state statutes and regulations. See "Part I, Item 1. Business - Supervision and Regulation - Dividends," for information on regulatory restrictions on dividends.

Stock Compensation Plans

Until its expiration date on February 18, 2018, the Company maintained the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, which was designed to attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions, provide employees with an equity interest in the Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company, and reward employees for outstanding performance and the attainment of targeted goals. 

The Company's 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2018 Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on February 20, 2018 and approved by shareholders on May 15, 2018 at the Company's 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2018 Plan replaced the Company's 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, the term of which expired in 2018. The plans and stock compensation in general are discussed in Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2019,2020, relating to the Company's equity based compensation plans, pursuant to which grants of options to acquire shares of common stock have been and may be granted from time to time.

 December 31, 2019
 Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options Weighted-Average Per Share Exercise Price of Outstanding Options Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Stock Compensation Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders13,944
 $16.63
 622,553
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
 
 
Total13,944
 $16.63
 622,553

  

December 31, 2020

 
  Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Weighted-Average Per Share Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  10,541  $16.63   571,460 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

         

Total

  10,541  $16.63   571,460 

Stock Repurchase Program

On January 19, 2018 the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of Directors of a stock repurchase program. The program authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock over a two year period that ended on December 31, 2019.

Shares of the Company's common stock were repurchased during the three months ended December 31, 2019, as detailed below. Under the share repurchase program, the Company had the remaining authority to repurchase up to 214,132 shares of the Company's common stock had the program not expired on December 31, 2019.
Period Beginning on First Day of Month Ended Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs
         
October 31, 2019 4,242
 $35.68
 4,242
 263,593
November 30, 2019 35,580
 37.45
 35,580
 228,013
December 31, 2019 13,881
 37.78
 13,881
 214,132
Total 53,703
 $37.39
 53,703
  
In 2019, the Company repurchased 85,868 shares at an average cost of $36.64 per share, for a total cost of $3,146,000. The Company did not repurchase any shares in 2018.

On December 19, 2019, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of Directors of anothera stock repurchase program. The program authorizesthat authorized the repurchase of up to 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2020. The Company suspended the program in the second quarter of 2020 in an effort to conserve capital due to COVID-19. In 2020, the Company repurchased 140,526 shares at an average cost of $35.44 per share for a total cost of $4,981,000.


On January 12, 2021, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of Directors of a stock repurchase program that authorizes the repurchase of up to 350,000 shares of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2021.

Comparative Stock Performance

The following graph compares the Company's cumulative total return to its shareholders with the returns of two indexes for the five-year period ended December 31, 2019.2020. The cumulative total return was calculated taking into consideration changes in stock price, cash dividends, stock dividends, and stock splits since December 31, 2014.2015. The indexes are the Nasdaq Composite Index and the SNL Bank $1 Billion - $5 Billion Index, which includes bank holding companies with assets of $1 billion to $5 billion and is published by SNL Financial, LC.

American National Bankshares Inc.

trpgraph.jpg
chart-1ba62a7da725519da85.jpg

  

Period Ending

 

Index

 

12/31/2015

  

12/31/2016

  

12/31/2017

  

12/31/2018

  

12/31/2019

  

12/31/2020

 

American National Bankshares Inc.

 $100.00  $140.67  $158.91  $124.88  $173.57  $119.86 

Nasdaq Composite

  100.00   108.87   141.13   137.12   187.44   271.64 

SNL Bank $1B-$5B

  100.00   143.87   153.37   134.37   163.35   138.81 

 Period Ending
Index12/31/14
 12/31/15
 12/31/16
 12/31/17
 12/31/18
 12/31/19
American National Bankshares Inc.$100.00
 $107.38
 $151.05
 $170.64
 $134.09
 $186.38
Nasdaq Composite100.00
 106.96
 116.45
 150.96
 146.67
 200.49
SNL Bank $1B-$5B100.00
 111.94
 161.04
 171.69
 150.42
 182.85
25


ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected financial data for the Company for the last five years:

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share information and ratios)

                    
  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Results of Operations:

                    

Interest income

 $95,840  $92,855  $68,768  $63,038  $56,170 

Interest expense

  12,020   15,728   9,674   7,291   6,316 

Net interest income

  83,820   77,127   59,094   55,747   49,854 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  8,916   456   (103)  1,016   250 

Noninterest income

  16,843   15,170   13,274   14,227   13,505 

Noninterest expense

  54,565   66,074   44,246   42,883   39,801 

Income before income tax provision

  37,182   25,767   28,225   26,075   23,308 

Income tax provision

  7,137   4,861   5,646   10,826   7,007 

Net income

 $30,045  $20,906  $22,579  $15,249  $16,301 
                     

Financial Condition:

                    

Assets

 $3,050,010  $2,478,550  $1,862,866  $1,816,078  $1,678,638 

Loans, net of unearned income

  2,015,056   1,830,815   1,357,476   1,336,125   1,164,821 

Securities

  474,806   387,825   339,730   327,447   352,726 

Deposits

  2,611,330   2,060,547   1,566,227   1,534,726   1,370,640 

Shareholders' equity

  337,894   320,258   222,542   208,717   201,380 

Shareholders' equity, tangible (1)

  246,755   228,528   177,744   163,654   155,789 
                     

Per Share Information:

                    

Earnings per share, basic

 $2.74  $1.99  $2.60  $1.76  $1.89 

Earnings per share, diluted

  2.73   1.98   2.59   1.76   1.89 

Cash dividends paid

  1.08   1.04   1.00   0.97   0.96 

Book value

  30.77   28.93   25.52   24.13   23.37 

Book value, tangible (1)

  22.47   20.64   20.38   18.92   18.08 

Average common shares outstanding - basic

  10,981,623   10,531,572   8,698,014   8,641,717   8,611,507 

Average common shares outstanding - diluted

  10,985,790   10,541,337   8,708,462   8,660,628   8,621,241 
                     

Selected Ratios:

                    

Return on average assets

  1.08%  0.91%  1.24%  0.87%  1.02%

Return on average common equity (2)

  9.12%  7.16%  10.56%  7.34%  8.07%

Return on average tangible common equity (1)(3)

  13.19%  10.43%  13.49%  9.59%  10.85%

Dividend payout ratio

  39.41%  52.45%  38.54%  54.98%  50.71%

Efficiency ratio (1)(4)

  52.80%  57.25%  59.20%  60.14%  59.97%

Net interest margin

  3.30%  3.68%  3.49%  3.50%  3.52%
                     

Asset Quality Ratios:

                    

Allowance for loan losses to period end loans

  1.06%  0.72%  0.94%  1.02%  1.10%

Allowance for loan losses to period end nonperforming loans

  793.88%  570.59%  1,101.98%  531.37%  360.39%

Nonperforming assets to total assets

  0.12%  0.15%  0.11%  0.21%  0.29%

Net charge-offs to average loans

  0.03%  0.01%  0.05%  0.02%  0.00%
                     

Capital Ratios:

                    

Total risk-based capital ratio

  15.18%  14.04%  15.35%  14.39%  14.81%

Common equity tier 1 capital ratio

  12.36%  11.56%  12.55%  11.50%  11.77%

Tier 1 capital ratio

  13.78%  12.98%  14.46%  13.42%  13.83%

Tier 1 leverage ratio

  9.48%  10.75%  11.62%  10.95%  11.67%

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio (1)(5)

  8.34%  9.57%  9.78%  9.24%  9.54%

26

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share information and ratios)
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Results of Operations:         
Interest income$92,855
 $68,768
 $63,038
 $56,170
 $55,169
Interest expense15,728
 9,674
 7,291
 6,316
 5,904
Net interest income77,127
 59,094
 55,747
 49,854
 49,265
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses456
 (103) 1,016
 250
 950
Noninterest income15,170
 13,274
 14,227
 13,505
 13,287
Noninterest expense66,074
 44,246
 42,883
 39,801
 40,543
Income before income tax provision25,767
 28,225
 26,075
 23,308
 21,059
Income tax provision4,861
 5,646
 10,826
 7,007
 6,020
Net income$20,906
 $22,579
 $15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
          
Financial Condition: 
  
  
  
  
Assets$2,478,550
 $1,862,866
 $1,816,078
 $1,678,638
 $1,547,599
Loans, net of unearned income1,830,815
 1,357,476
 1,336,125
 1,164,821
 1,005,525
Securities387,825
 339,730
 327,447
 352,726
 345,661
Deposits2,060,547
 1,566,227
 1,534,726
 1,370,640
 1,262,660
Shareholders' equity320,258
 222,542
 208,717
 201,380
 197,835
Shareholders' equity, tangible (1)228,528
 177,744
 163,654
 155,789
 151,280
          
Per Share Information: 
  
  
  
  
Earnings per share, basic$1.99
 $2.60
 $1.76
 $1.89
 $1.73
Earnings per share, diluted1.98
 2.59
 1.76
 1.89
 1.73
Cash dividends paid1.04
 1.00
 0.97
 0.96
 0.93
Book value28.93
 25.52
 24.13
 23.37
 22.95
Book value, tangible (1)20.64
 20.38
 18.92
 18.08
 17.55
          
Average common shares outstanding - basic10,531,572
 8,698,014
 8,641,717
 8,611,507
 8,680,502
Average common shares outstanding - diluted10,541,337
 8,708,462
 8,660,628
 8,621,241
 8,688,450
          
Selected Ratios: 
  
  
  
  
Return on average assets0.91% 1.24% 0.87% 1.02% 0.99%
Return on average equity (2)7.16% 10.56% 7.34% 8.07% 7.65%
Return on average tangible equity (1)(3)10.43% 13.49% 9.59% 10.85% 10.62%
Dividend payout ratio52.45% 38.54% 54.98% 50.71% 53.65%
Efficiency ratio (1)(4)57.25% 59.20% 60.14% 59.97% 61.93%
Net interest margin3.68% 3.49% 3.50% 3.52% 3.69%
          
Asset Quality Ratios: 
  
  
  
  
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans0.72% 0.94% 1.02% 1.10% 1.25%
Allowance for loan losses to period end non-performing loans570.59% 1,101.98% 531.37% 360.39% 242.09%
Non-performing assets to total assets0.15% 0.11% 0.21% 0.29% 0.48%
Net charge-offs to average loans0.01% 0.05% 0.02% 0.00% 0.08%
          
Capital Ratios: 
  
  
  
  
Total risk-based capital ratio14.04% 15.35% 14.39% 14.81% 16.34%
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio11.56% 12.55% 11.50% 11.77% 12.88%
Tier 1 capital ratio12.98% 14.46% 13.42% 13.83% 15.23%
Tier 1 leverage ratio10.75% 11.62% 10.95% 11.67% 12.05%
Tangible equity to tangible assets ratio (1)(5)9.57% 9.78% 9.24% 9.54% 10.08%

(1)

(1)

Non-GAAP financial measure. See the Non-GAAP Presentations section of Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this Form 10-K for reconciliation.

(2)

Return on average common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by average common equity.

(3)

Return on average tangible common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders plus amortization of intangibles tax effected by average common equity less average intangibles.

(4)

The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense excluding (i) gains or losses on the sale of other real estate owned, (ii) core deposit intangible amortization, and (iii) merger related expenses by net interest income including tax equivalent income on nontaxable loans and securities and noninterest income excluding (x) gains or losses on securities and (y) gains or losses on sale or disposal of premises and equipment.

(5)

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio is calculated by dividing period-end common equity less period-end intangibles by period-end assets less period-end intangibles.

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The purpose of this discussion is to focus on significant changes in the financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the past three years. The discussion and analysis are intended to supplement and highlight information contained in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECLASSIFICATION

In certain circumstances, reclassifications have been made to prior period information to conform to the 20192020 presentation. There were no material reclassifications.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company conform with GAAP and they conform to general practices within the banking industry. The Company's critical accounting policies, which are summarized below, relate to (1) the allowance for loan losses, (2) mergers and acquisitions, (3) acquired loans with specific credit-related deterioration, (4) goodwill and intangible assets, (5) deferred tax assets and liabilities, and (6) other-than-temporary impairment of securities. A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The financial information contained within the Company's financial statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset, or relieving a liability. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of the allowance for loan losses ("ALLL") is to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and by recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Loan charge-offs decrease the allowance.

The goal of the Company is to maintain an appropriate, systematic, and consistently applied process to determine the amounts of the ALLL and the provision for loan loss expense.

The Company uses certain practices to manage its credit risk. These practices include (1) appropriate lending limits for loan officers, (2) a loan approval process, (3) careful underwriting of loan requests, including analysis of borrowers, cash flows, collateral, and market risks, (4) regular monitoring of the portfolio, including diversification by type and geography, (5) review of loans by the Loan Review department, which operates independently of loan production (the Loan Review function consists of a co-sourced arrangement using both internal personnel and external vendors to provide the Company with a more robust review function of the loan portfolio), (6) regular meetings of the Credit Committee to discuss portfolio and policy changes and make decisions on large or unusual loan requests, and (7) regular meetings of the Asset Quality Committee which reviews the status of individual loans.

Risk grades are assigned as part of the loan origination process. From time to time, risk grades may be modified as warranted by the facts and circumstances surrounding the credit.


Calculation and analysis of the ALLL is prepared quarterly by the Finance Department with input from the Credit Department. The Company's Credit Committee, Risk and Compliance Committee, Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors review the allowance for adequacy.

The Company's ALLL has two basic components: the formula allowance and the specific allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates and judgments.

The formula allowance uses historical loss experience as an indicator of future losses, along with various qualitative factors, including levels and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charge-offs and recoveries, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in underwriting standards, experience of lending staff, economic conditions, portfolio concentrations, regulatory, legal, competition, quality of loan review system, and value of underlying collateral. In the formula allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans, the historical loss rate is combined with the qualitative factors, resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each risk-grade category of loans. The period-end balances for each loan risk-grade category are multiplied by the adjusted loss factor. Allowance calculations for residential real estate and consumer loans are calculated based on historical losses for each product category without regard to risk grade. This loss rate is combined with qualitative factors resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each product category.

The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss for specifically identified impaired loans. These include:

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate.  The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);
The loan's observable market price; or
The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);

The loan's observable market price; or

The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The use of these computed values is inherently subjective and actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates.

No single statistic, formula, or measurement determines the adequacy of the allowance. Management makes subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. For analytical purposes, management allocates a portion of the allowance to specific loan categories and specific loans. However, the entire allowance is used to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including identified and unidentified losses.

The relationships and ratios used in calculating the allowance, including the qualitative factors, may change from period to period as facts and circumstances evolve. Furthermore, management cannot provide assurance that in any particular period the Bank will not have sizable credit losses in relation to the amount reserved. Management may find it necessary to significantly adjust the allowance, considering current factors at the time.

Mergers and Acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 805, Business Combinations, using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date measured at their fair values as of that date. To determine the fair values, the Company will rely on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation techniques. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the Company will identify the acquirer and the closing date and apply applicable recognition principles and conditions.

Acquisition-related costs are costs the Company incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs include advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees. Some other examples of costs to the Company include systems conversions, integration planning, consultants, and advertising costs. The Company will account for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities will be recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP. These acquisition-related costs have been and will be included within the consolidated statements of income classified within the noninterest expense caption.

Acquired Loans with Specific Credit-Related Deterioration

Acquired loans with specific credit deterioration are accounted for by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC 310-30, Receivables - Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Certain acquired loans, those for which specific credit-related deterioration since origination is identified, are recorded at the amount paid, such that there is no carryover of the seller's allowance for loan losses. Income recognition on these loans is based on a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows to be collected.

28

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company follows ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill resulting from business combinations after January 1, 2009 is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances existsexist that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company has selected June 30 as the date to perform the annual impairment test.  Due to the COVID-19 pandemic market conditions, the Company determined a triggering event occurred during the first quarter of 2020 and performed a qualitative assessment at March 31, 2020. As the pandemic continued, the Company performed qualitative assessments at June 30 and September 30 and a quantitative assessment at December 31, 2020. The assessments determined the fair value exceeded the carrying value and did not indicate impairment. The impact of COVID-19 on market conditions and other changes in the economic environment, operations, or other adverse events could result in future impairment charges which could have a material adverse impact on the Company's operating results. No indicators of impairment were identified during the year ended December 31, 2019.  Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortizedamortizing over their estimated useful lives which range from 8.25 toof 10 years, to their estimated residual values.years. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheets. No indicators of impairment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, or 2017.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

The realization of deferred income tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded if it is "more likely than not" that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. "More likely than not" is defined as greater than a 50% chance. Management considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed.

Other-than-temporary Impairment of Securities

Impairment of securities occurs when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. For debt securities, impairment is considered other-than-temporary and recognized in its entirety in net income if either (1) the Company intends to sell the security or (2) it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If, however, the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the Company must determine what portion of the impairment is attributable to a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. If there is no credit loss, there is no other-than-temporary impairment. If there is a credit loss, other-than-temporary impairment exists, and the credit loss must be recognized in net income and the remaining portion of impairment must be recognized in other comprehensive income.

COMPLETED

RECENT ACQUISITION

On April 1, 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of HomeTown. The combination deepened the Company's footprint in the Roanoke, Virginia metropolitan area and created a presence in the New River Valley with an office in Christiansburg, Virginia. After the merger and with two office consolidations, the Company has eight offices in the combined Roanoke/New River Valley market area. As a result of the merger, the holders of shares of HomeTown common stock received 0.4150 shares of the Company's common stock for each share of HomeTown common stock held immediately prior to the effective date of the merger. Following completion of the merger, HomeTown's subsidiary bank, HomeTown Bank, was merged with and into the Bank.

NON-GAAP PRESENTATIONS

Non-GAAP presentations are provided because the Company believes these may be valuable to investors. These include (1) the calculation of the efficiency ratio, (2) the analysis of net interest income presented on a taxable equivalent basis to facilitate performance comparisons among various taxable and tax-exempt assets, (3) return on average tangible common equity, (4) tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio, and (5) tangible book value.value per share.

The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense excluding (1) gains or losses on the sale of other real estate owned ("OREO"), (2) core deposit intangible amortization and (3) merger related expense by net interest income including tax equivalent income on nontaxable loans and securities and noninterest income and excluding (x) gains or losses on securities and (y) gains or losses on sale or disposal of premises and equipment. The efficiency ratio for 2020, 2019, and 2018 and 2017 was 52.80%, 57.25%, 59.20%, and 60.14%59.20%, respectively. The Company expects continued improvement in this ratio to increase in 2020. This2021 as the benefits of PPP related items decrease. The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company believes provides investors with important information regarding operational efficiency. Such information is not prepared in accordance with GAAP and should not be construed as such. Management believes, however, such financial information is meaningful to the reader in understanding operating performance but cautions that such information not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP.GAAP information. In addition, the Company’sCompany's non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures of other companies. The Company, in referring to its net income, is referring to


income under GAAP. The components of the efficiency ratio calculation are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Efficiency Ratio     
Noninterest expense$66,074
 $44,246
 $42,883
Add/subtract: gain/loss on sale OREO52
 (44) (164)
Subtract: core deposit intangible amortization(1,398) (265) (528)
Subtract: merger related expenses(11,782) (872) 
 $52,946
 $43,065
 $42,191
      
Net interest income$77,127
 $59,094
 $55,747
Tax equivalent adjustment369
 556
 1,339
Noninterest income15,170
 13,274
 14,227
Subtract: gain on securities(607) (123) (812)
Add/subtract: loss/gain on sale of fixed assets427
 (60) (344)
 $92,486
 $72,741
 $70,157
      
Efficiency ratio57.25% 59.20% 60.14%

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Efficiency Ratio

            

Noninterest expense

 $54,565  $66,074  $44,246 

Add/subtract: gain/loss on sale OREO, net of writedowns

  4   52   (44)

Subtract: core deposit intangible amortization

  (1,637)  (1,398)  (265)

Subtract: merger related expenses

     (11,782)  (872)
  $52,932  $52,946  $43,065 
             

Net interest income

 $83,820  $77,127  $59,094 

Tax equivalent adjustment

  288   369   556 

Noninterest income

  16,843   15,170   13,274 

Subtract: gain on securities

  (814)  (607)  (123)

Add/subtract: loss/gain on sale of fixed assets

  110   427   (60)
  $100,247  $92,486  $72,741 
             

Efficiency ratio

  52.80%  57.25%  59.20%

Net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by total average earning assets. Because a portion of interest income earned by the Company is nontaxable, the tax equivalent net interest income is considered in the calculation of this ratio. Tax equivalent net interest income is calculated by adding the tax benefit realized from interest income that is nontaxable to total interest income then subtracting total interest expense. The tax rate utilized in calculating the tax benefit is 21% for 2020, 2019, and 2018 and 35% for 2017.2018. The reconciliation of tax equivalent net interest income, which is not a measurement under GAAP, to net interest income, is reflected in the table below (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Reconciliation of Net Interest Income to Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income     
Non-GAAP measures:     
Interest income - loans$82,869
 $60,159
 $55,581
Interest income - investments and other10,355
 9,165
 8,796
Interest expense - deposits(13,143) (8,086) (5,794)
Interest expense - customer repurchase agreements(595) (164) (142)
Interest expense - other short-term borrowings(55) (22) (31)
Interest expense - long-term borrowings(1,935) (1,402) (1,324)
Total net interest income$77,496
 $59,650
 $57,086
Less non-GAAP measures:     
Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income - loans$(185) $(192) $(305)
Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income - municipal securities(184) (364) (1,034)
GAAP measures$77,127
 $59,094
 $55,747

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Reconciliation of Net Interest Income to Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income

            

Non-GAAP measures:

            

Interest income - loans

 $87,881  $82,869  $60,159 

Interest income - investments and other

  8,247   10,355   9,165 

Interest expense - deposits

  (9,729)  (13,143)  (8,086)

Interest expense - customer repurchase agreements

  (259)  (596)  (164)

Interest expense - other short-term borrowings

     (54)  (22)

Interest expense - long-term borrowings

  (2,032)  (1,935)  (1,402)

Total net interest income

 $84,108  $77,496  $59,650 

Less non-GAAP measures:

            

Tax benefit realized on nontaxable interest income - loans

  (181)  (185)  (192)

Tax benefit realized on nontaxable interest income - municipal securities

  (107)  (184)  (364)

GAAP measures net interest income

 $83,820  $77,127  $59,094 

Return on average tangible common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by average common equity.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Return on Average Tangible Common Equity

            

Return on average common equity (GAAP basis)

  9.12%  7.16%  10.56%

Impact of excluding average goodwill and other intangibles

  4.07%  3.27%  2.93%

Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  13.19%  10.43%  13.49%

30

  Years Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Return on Average Tangible Equity    
Return on average equity (GAAP basis) 7.16% 10.56%
Impact of excluding average goodwill and other intangibles 3.27% 2.93%
Return on average tangible equity (non-GAAP) 10.43% 13.49%

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio is calculated by dividing period-end common equity less period-end intangibles by period-end assets less period-end intangibles.

  As of December 31,
  2019 2018
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets    
Equity to assets ratio (GAAP basis) 12.92 % 11.95 %
Impact of excluding goodwill and other intangibles (3.35)% (2.17)%
Tangible equity to tangible assets ratio (non-GAAP) 9.57 % 9.78 %

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets

        

Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP basis)

  11.08%  12.92%

Impact of excluding goodwill and other intangibles

  (2.74)%  (3.35)%

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio (non-GAAP)

  8.34%  9.57%

The Company presents book value per share (period-end shareholders' equity divided by period-end common shares outstanding) and tangible book value per share. In calculating tangible book value, the Company excludes goodwill and other intangible assets.

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Tangible Book Value Per Share

        

Book value per share (GAAP basis)

 $30.77  $28.93 

Impact of excluding goodwill and other intangibles

  (8.30)  (8.29)

Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)

 $22.47  $20.64 

  As of December 31,
  2019 2018
Tangible Book Value Per Share    
Book value per share (GAAP basis) $28.93
 $25.52
Impact of excluding goodwill and other intangibles (8.29) (5.14)
Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) $20.64
 $20.38

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Overview

The Company's 2020 financial highlights include the following:

Earnings produced a return on average tangible common equity of 13.19% for 2020, compared to 10.43% for 2019.*

Average deposits grew 22.3% in 2020 over 2019.

Net interest margin was 3.30% for 2020, down from 3.68% for 2019.*   

Noninterest revenues increased $1.7 million, or 11.0%, when compared to the previous year.

Noninterest expense decreased $11.5 million, or 17.4%, when compared to 2019, primarily due to $11.8 million in one-time merger expenses associated with the HomeTown acquisition in 2019.

The 2020 provision for loan losses totaled $8.9 million, which compares to a provision of $456 thousand in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans held for investment increased to 1.06% at year-end 2020, compared to 0.72% at year-end 2019.

Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets were 0.12% at December 31, 2020, down from 0.15% at December 31, 2019.

Net charge-offs were 0.03% for 2020, up from 0.01% for 2019.

As a result of the Company's participation in the SBA's PPP under the CARES Act, it had outstanding net PPP loans of $211.3 million at December 31, 2020. The Company had net unamortized PPP loan origination fees with a balance of $4.4 million at December 31, 2020.

*Refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section within this section for further information on these non-GAAP financial measurements.

Net Income

Net income for 2020 was $30,045,000 compared to $20,906,000 for 2019, an increase of $9,139,000, or 43.7%. Basic earnings per share were $2.74 for 2020 compared to $1.99 for 2019. Diluted earnings per share were $2.73 for 2020 compared to $1.98 for 2019. This net income produced for 2020 a return on average assets of 1.08%, a return on average common equity of 9.12%, and a return on average tangible common equity of 13.19%.

The increase in earnings in 2020 was primarily related to the April 1, 2019 merger with HomeTown as the Company realized a full year of operations from the combined entities and 2019 earnings were impacted adversely by $11,782,000 in one-time merger expenses. 

Net income for 2019 was $20,906,000 compared to $22,579,000 for 2018, a decrease of $1,673,000, or 7.4%. Basic earnings per share were $1.99 for 2019 compared to $2.60 for 2018. Diluted earnings per share were $1.98 for 2019 compared to $2.59 for 2018. This net income produced for 2019 a return on average assets of 0.91%, a return on average common equity of 7.16%, and a return on average tangible common equity of 10.43%.

The decrease in earnings in 2019 was primarily related to the April 1, 2019 merger with HomeTown, as earnings were impacted adversely by $11,782,000 in one-time merger expenses. Partially offsetting this impact were increases in net interest income associated with higher loan yields and greater loan volume also associated with the HomeTown acquisition augmented by organic growth throughout the rest of the Company's franchise.

Net income for 2018 was $22,579,000 compared to $15,249,000 for 2017, an increase of $7,330,000 or 48.1%. Basic earnings per share were $2.60 for 2018 compared to $1.76 for 2017. Diluted earnings per share were $2.59 for 2018 compared to $1.76 for 2017. This net income produced for 2018 a return on average assets of 1.24%, a return on average equity of 10.56%, and a return on average tangible equity of 13.49%.
Earnings for 2018 as compared to 2017 were also positively impacted by increased net interest income, resulting mostly from higher yields on the loan portfolio and greater loan volume. Additionally, earnings in 2018 increased due to a significant reduction in the loan loss provision. The need for a loan loss provision was reduced by three factors: loan balances, continued strong asset quality metrics, and improvements in various qualitative factors used in computing the allowance for loan losses. Lastly, benefiting 2018 earnings was the substantial decrease in the corporate tax rate. The corporate tax rate reduction from 35% to 21%, enacted into law by the Tax Reform Act in late 2017, became effective in 2018.
Although the corporate tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% became effective in 2018, the enactment required companies to revalue their deferred tax assets at the new tax rate in 2017. Accordingly, in December 2017 the Company recognized a $2.7 million charge ($0.31 per share) to its deferred tax asset and a corresponding increase in income tax expense.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings. Fluctuations in interest rates as well as volume and mix changes in earning assets and interest bearing liabilities can materially impact net interest income. The 2011 acquisition of MidCarolina Financial Corporation ("MidCarolina"),Mergers including the 2015 acquisition of MainStreet Bankshares, Inc. ("Mainstreet"), and themost recent 2019 acquisition of HomeTown impacted net interest income positively for 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018 through increased earning assets.


The following discussion of net interest income is presented on a taxable equivalent basis to facilitate performance comparisons among various taxable and tax-exempt assets, such as certain state and municipal securities. A tax rate of 21% was used in adjusting interest on tax-exempt assets to a fully taxable equivalent basis for 2020, 2019, and 2018, and a tax rate of 35% was used for 2017.2018. Net interest income divided by average earning assets is referred to as the net interest margin. The net interest spread represents the difference between the average rate earned on earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. All references in this section relate to average yields and rates and average asset and liability balances during the periods discussed.

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis increased $6,612,000, or 8.5%, in 2020 from 2019, following a $17,846,000, or 29.9%, increase in 2019 from 2018. The increase in net interest income in 2020 was primarily due to increased volume of earning assets. Average loan balances for 2020 were up $310,962,000 or 18.2%, over 2019, primarily due to PPP lending. These loans had a net balance of $211,275,000 at December 31, 2020, earn 1% interest and generated fee income that is being accreted over the life of the loans. The fee accretion contributed to the yield on the PPP portfolio, but the much lower effective rate contributed to decreased loan yields for 2020. PPP yield may be positively impacted in future periods due to forgiveness and recognition of net fees. Net interest margin benefited from $6.1 million in interest earned on these loans, net of deferred fees and costs. Loan yields overall for 2020 were 50 basis points lower than 2019, reflecting a much lower rate environment during the period and the effect of PPP lending.

Yields on loans were 4.36% in 2020 compared to 4.86% in 2019. Cost of funds was 0.72% in 2020 compared to 1.08% in 2019. Between 2020 and 2019, deposit rates for demand accounts decreased to 0.09% from 0.12%, money market accounts decreased to 0.46% from 1.18%, and time deposits decreased to 1.52% from 1.58%. The net interest margin was 3.30% for 2020, compared to 3.68% for 2019. The decrease in net interest margin was driven by declining interest rates and the impact of the lower rate on the PPP lending.

In 2020, the FOMC, in response to the COVID-19 crisis, reduced the target federal funds rate by 0.50% on March 3 and by another 1.00% on March 15, taking the federal funds target rate down to 0.25% where it remained for the rest of the year.

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis increased $17,846,000, or 29.9%, in 2019 from 2018, following a $2,564,000, or 4.5%, increase in 2018 from 2017. The increase in net interest income in 2019 was primarily due to increased volumes of earning assets and higher loan yields related to the acquisition of HomeTown coupled with organic growth in the legacy bank.

Yields on loans were 4.86% in 2019 compared to 4.51% in 2018. Cost of funds was 1.08% in 2019 compared to 0.82% in 2018. Between 2019 and 2018, deposit rates for demand accounts increased to 0.12% from 0.02%, money market accounts increased to 1.18% from 0.89%, and time deposits increased to 1.58% from 1.20%. Management regularly reviews deposit pricing and attempts to keep costs as low as possible, while remaining competitive. The net interest margin was 3.68% for 2019, compared to 3.49% for 2018.
The Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") raised the target federal funds rate by 0.25% on each of March 15, June 14, and December 13, 2017, ending the year at 1.50%. In 2018, the FOMC raised the target federal funds rate by 0.25% on each of March 21, June 13, September 26, and December 19, ending the year at 2.50%. The FOMC reduced the target federal funds rate by 0.25% on each of July 31, September 18, and October 30, 2019, ending the year at 1.75%.
Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis increased $2,564,000, or 4.5%, in 2018 from 2017, following a $5,386,000, or 10.4%, increase in 2017 from 2016. The increase in net interest income in 2018 was primarily due to increased volumes of earning assets related to organic growth and increasing market interest rates.
Yields on loans were 4.51% in 2018 compared to 4.39% in 2017. Cost of funds was 0.82% in 2018 compared to 0.64% in 2017. Between 2018 and 2017, deposit rates for demand accounts remained the same at 0.02%, money market accounts increased to 0.89% from 0.50%, and time deposits increased to 1.20% from 1.05%. The increase in money market rates was related mainly to high dollar volume commercial and municipal customer accounts. The net interest margin was 3.49% for 2018, compared to 3.50% for 2017.

The following presentation is an analysis of net interest income and related yields and rates, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the last three years. Nonaccrual loans are included in average balances. Interest income on nonaccrual loans, if recognized, is recorded on a cash basis or when the loan returns to accrual status.

32

Net Interest Income Analysis

(in thousands, except yields and rates)

 Average Balance 
Interest Income/Expense(1)
 Average Yield/Rate
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Loans:                 
Commercial$306,065
 $264,241
 $229,239
 $14,125
 $10,579
 $8,829
 4.62% 4.00% 3.85%
Real estate1,388,188
 1,063,950
 1,031,558
 68,050
 49,275
 46,400
 4.90
 4.63
 4.50
Consumer10,046
 4,676
 4,652
 694
 305
 352
 6.91
 6.52
 7.57
Total loans(2)
1,704,299
 1,332,867
 1,265,449
 82,869
 60,159
 55,581
 4.86
 4.51
 4.39
                  
Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
      
Federal agencies and GSEs132,916
 121,923
 97,670
 3,191
 2,708
 1,849
 2.40
 2.22
 1.89
Mortgage-backed and CMOs134,458
 109,048
 82,042
 3,350
 2,467
 1,725
 2.49
 2.26
 2.10
State and municipal58,293
 85,061
 105,869
 1,650
 2,399
 3,781
 2.83
 2.82
 3.57
Other securities16,552
 14,950
 15,796
 903
 718
 707
 5.46
 4.80
 4.48
Total securities342,219
 330,982
 301,377
 9,094
 8,292
 8,062
 2.66
 2.51
 2.68
                  
Deposits in other banks60,651
 45,434
 65,027
 1,261
 873
 734
 2.08
 1.92
 1.13
Total interest earning assets2,107,169
 1,709,283
 1,631,853
 93,224
 69,324
 64,377
 4.42
 4.06
 3.95
                  
Nonearning assets196,455
 118,375
 126,159
  
  
  
      
                  
Total assets$2,303,624
 $1,827,658
 $1,758,012
  
  
  
      
                  
Deposits: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Demand$307,329
 $234,857
 $217,833
 370
 49
 43
 0.12
 0.02
 0.02
Money market445,505
 393,321
 335,085
 5,246
 3,505
 1,668
 1.18
 0.89
 0.50
Savings166,842
 132,182
 125,157
 284
 40
 38
 0.17
 0.03
 0.03
Time457,746
 374,152
 383,444
 7,243
 4,492
 4,045
 1.58
 1.20
 1.05
Total deposits1,377,422
 1,134,512
 1,061,519
 13,143
 8,086
 5,794
 0.95
 0.71
 0.55
                  
Customer repurchase agreements39,134
 18,401
 46,335
 596
 164
 142
 1.52
 0.89
 0.31
Other short-term borrowings2,694
 1,149
 3,158
 54
 22
 31
 2.00
 1.91
 0.98
Long-term borrowings33,644
 27,874
 36,887
 1,935
 1,402
 1,324
 5.75
 5.03
 3.59
Total interest bearing liabilities1,452,894
 1,181,936
 1,147,899
 15,728
 9,674
 7,291
 1.08
 0.82
 0.64
                  
Noninterest bearing demand deposits537,775
 421,527
 392,663
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other liabilities20,933
 10,374
 9,643
  
  
  
  
  
  
Shareholders' equity292,022
 213,821
 207,807
  
  
  
  
  
  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$2,303,624
 $1,827,658
 $1,758,012
  
  
  
  
  
  
                  
Interest rate spread 
  
  
  
  
  
 3.34% 3.24% 3.31%
Net interest margin 
  
  
  
  
  
 3.68% 3.49% 3.50%
                  
Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis)  
 77,496
 59,650
 57,086
      
Less: Taxable equivalent adjustment(3)
  
 369
 556
 1,339
      
Net interest income  
  
 $77,127
 $59,094
 $55,747
      

  

Average Balance

  

Interest Income/Expense(1)

  

Average Yield/Rate

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Loans:

                                    

Commercial

 $475,068  $306,065  $264,241  $17,768  $14,125  $10,579   3.74%  4.62%  4.00%

Real estate

  1,531,195   1,388,188   1,063,950   69,525   68,050   49,275   4.54   4.90   4.63 

Consumer

  8,998   10,046   4,676   588   694   305   6.53   6.91   6.52 

Total loans(2)

  2,015,261   1,704,299   1,332,867   87,881   82,869   60,159   4.36   4.86   4.51 
                                     

Securities:

                                    
U.S. Treasury  9,010         51         0.57       

Federal agencies and GSEs

  72,112   132,916   121,923   1,423   3,191   2,708   1.97   2.40   2.22 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  200,612   134,458   109,048   4,060   3,350   2,467   2.02   2.49   2.26 

State and municipal

  45,836   58,293   85,061   1,175   1,650   2,399   2.56   2.83   2.82 

Other securities

  20,382   16,552   14,950   1,098   903   718   5.39   5.46   4.80 

Total securities

  347,952   342,219   330,982   7,807   9,094   8,292   2.24   2.66   2.51 
                                     

Deposits in other banks

  188,700   60,651   45,434   440   1,261   873   0.23   2.08   1.92 
                                     

Total interest earning assets

  2,551,913   2,107,169   1,709,283   96,128   93,224   69,324   3.77   4.42   4.06 
                                     

Nonearning assets

  221,094   196,455   118,375                         
                                     

Total assets

 $2,773,007  $2,303,624  $1,827,658                         
                                     

Deposits:

                                    

Demand

 $386,790  $307,329  $234,857   344   370   49   0.09   0.12   0.02 

Money market

  574,510   445,505   393,321   2,634   5,246   3,505   0.46   1.18   0.89 

Savings

  198,313   166,842   132,182   117   284   40   0.06   0.17   0.03 

Time

  436,081   457,746   374,152   6,634   7,243   4,492   1.52   1.58   1.20 

Total deposits

  1,595,694   1,377,422   1,134,512   9,729   13,143   8,086   0.61   0.95   0.71 
                                     

Customer repurchase agreements

  42,937   39,134   18,401   259   596   164   0.60   1.52   0.89 

Other short-term borrowings

  1   2,694   1,149      54   22   0.55   2.00   1.91 

Long-term borrowings

  35,586   33,644   27,874   2,032   1,935   1,402   5.71   5.75   5.03 

Total interest bearing liabilities

  1,674,218   1,452,894   1,181,936   12,020   15,728   9,674   0.72   1.08   0.82 
                                     

Noninterest bearing demand deposits

  746,659   537,775   421,527                         

Other liabilities

  22,777   20,933   10,374                         

Shareholders' equity

  329,353   292,022   213,821                         

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $2,773,007  $2,303,624  $1,827,658                         
                                     

Interest rate spread

                          3.05%  3.34%  3.24%

Net interest margin

                          3.30%  3.68%  3.49%
                                     

Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis)

              84,108   77,496   59,650             

Less: Taxable equivalent adjustment(3)

              288   369   556             

Net interest income

             $83,820  $77,127  $59,094             

______________________

(1) Interest income includes net accretion/amortization of acquired loan fair value adjustments and the net accretion/amortization of deferred loan fees/costs.

(2) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balances.

(3) A tax rate of 21% in 2020, 2019, and 2018 and 35% in 2017 was used in adjusting interest on tax-exempt assets to a fully taxable equivalent basis.

33

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense, and distinguishes between changes resulting from fluctuations in average balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities (volume), and changes resulting from fluctuations in average interest rates on such assets and liabilities (rate). Changes attributable to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately (dollars in thousands):

Changes in Net Interest Income (Rate / Volume Analysis)

  

2020 vs. 2019

  

2019 vs. 2018

 
      

Change

      

Change

 
  

Increase

  

Attributable to

  

Increase

  

Attributable to

 

Interest income

 

(Decrease)

  

Rate

  

Volume

  

(Decrease)

  

Rate

  

Volume

 

Loans:

                        

Commercial

 $3,643  $(3,056) $6,699  $3,546  $1,741  $1,805 

Real estate

  1,475   (5,234)  6,709   18,775   3,022   15,753 

Consumer

  (106)  (36)  (70)  389   19   370 

Total loans

  5,012   (8,326)  13,338   22,710   4,782   17,928 

Securities:

                        
U.S. Treasury  51      51          

Federal agencies and GSEs

  (1,768)  (495)  (1,273)  483   228   255 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  710   (714)  1,424   883   268   615 

State and municipal

  (475)  (145)  (330)  (749)  9   (758)

Other securities

  195   (11)  206   185   103   82 

Total securities

  (1,287)  (1,365)  78   802   608   194 

Deposits in other banks

  (821)  (1,819)  998   388   76   312 

Total interest income

  2,904   (11,510)  14,414   23,900   5,466   18,434 
                         

Interest expense

                        

Deposits:

                        

Demand

  (26)  (109)  83   321   301   20 

Money market

  (2,612)  (3,833)  1,221   1,741   1,232   509 

Savings

  (167)  (213)  46   244   231   13 

Time

  (609)  (273)  (336)  2,751   1,616   1,135 

Total deposits

  (3,414)  (4,428)  1,014   5,057   3,380   1,677 

Customer repurchase agreements

  (337)  (390)  53   432   166   266 
Other short-term borrowings  (54)  (27)  (27)  32   1   31 

Long-term borrowings

  97   (14)  111   533   218   315 

Total interest expense

  (3,708)  (4,859)  1,151   6,054   3,765   2,289 

Net interest income

 $6,612  $(6,651) $13,263  $17,846  $1,701  $16,145 

Fair Value Impact to Net Interest Margin

The Company's fully taxable equivalent net interest margin includes the impact of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments. The impact of net accretion for 2018, 2019, and 2020 and the remaining estimated net accretion are reflected in the following table (dollars in thousands):

  

Loans Accretion

  

Deposit Accretion

  

Borrowings Amortization

  

Total

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018

 $1,390  $  $(102) $1,288 

For the year ended December 31, 2019

  3,101   375   (89)  3,387 

For the year ended December 31, 2020

  4,516   181   (85)  4,612 

For the years ending (estimated):

                

2021

  1,854   78   (102)  1,830 

2022

  1,198   50   (102)  1,146 

2023

  718   30   (102)  646 

2024

  485   5   (102)  388 

2025

  381   2   (102)  281 

Thereafter (estimated)

  1,696   3   (743)  956 

34

 2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
 Increase 
Change
Attributable to
 Increase Change
Attributable to
Interest income(Decrease) Rate Volume (Decrease) Rate Volume
Loans:           
Commercial$3,546
 $1,741
 $1,805
 $1,750
 $360
 $1,390
Real estate18,775
 3,022
 15,753
 2,875
 1,396
 1,479
Consumer389
 19
 370
 (47) (49) 2
Total loans22,710
 4,782
 17,928
 4,578
 1,707
 2,871
Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
Federal agencies and GSEs483
 228
 255
 859
 353
 506
Mortgage-backed and CMOs883
 268
 615
 742
 139
 603
State and municipal(749) 9
 (758) (1,382) (714) (668)
Other securities185
 103
 82
 11
 50
 (39)
Total securities802
 608
 194
 230
 (172) 402
Deposits in other banks388
 76
 312
 139
 407
 (268)
Total interest income23,900
 5,466
 18,434
 4,947
 1,942
 3,005
            
Interest expense 
  
  
  
  
  
Deposits: 
  
  
  
  
  
Demand321
 301
 20
 6
 3
 3
Money market1,741
 1,232
 509
 1,837
 1,506
 331
Savings244
 231
 13
 2
 
 2
Time2,751
 1,616
 1,135
 447
 547
 (100)
Total deposits5,057
 3,380
 1,677
 2,292
 2,056
 236
Customer repurchase agreements432
 166
 266
 22
 147
 (125)
Other borrowings565
 179
 386
 69
 506
 (437)
Total interest expense6,054
 3,725
 2,329
 2,383
 2,709
 (326)
Net interest income$17,846
 $1,741
 $16,105
 $2,564
 $(767) $3,331

Noninterest Income

For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, noninterest income increased $1,896,000$1,673,000, or 14.3%11.0%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Noninterest income:       
 Trust fees$3,847
 $3,783
 $64
 1.7 %
 Service charges on deposit accounts2,866
 2,455
 411
 16.7
 Other fees and commissions3,693
 2,637
 1,056
 40.0
 Mortgage banking income2,439
 1,862
 577
 31.0
 Securities gains, net607
 123
 484
 393.5
 Brokerage fees721
 795
 (74) (9.3)
 Income from Small Business Investment Companies211
 637
 (426) (66.9)
 Gains (losses) on premises and equipment, net(427) 60
 (487) (811.7)
 Other1,213
 922
 291
 31.6
Total noninterest income$15,170
 $13,274
 $1,896
 14.3 %
2019.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest income:

                

Trust fees

 $4,044  $3,847  $197   5.1%

Service charges on deposit accounts

  2,557   2,866   (309)  (10.8)

Other fees and commissions

  3,925   3,693   232   6.3 

Mortgage banking income

  3,514   2,439   1,075   44.1 

Securities gains, net

  814   607   207   34.1 

Brokerage fees

  745   721   24   3.3 

Income from Small Business Investment Companies

  270   211   59   28.0 

Losses on premises and equipment, net

  (110)  (427)  317   74.2 

Other

  1,084   1,213   (129)  (10.6)

Total noninterest income

 $16,843  $15,170  $1,673   11.0%

A substantial portion of trust fees are earned based on account fair values, so changes in the equity markets may have a large and potentially volatile impact on revenue. Trust fees increased $197,000 for 2020 compared to 2019. Other fees and commissions increased $232,000 in 2020 compared to 2019, while service charges decreased $309,000. Due to the actions taken to combat COVID-19, such as stay-at-home orders and restaurant and retail changes, debit card income decreased as consumers did not spend at the same levels in 2020 as 2019. The Company saw decreases in overdraft and related fees, another component of service charge income, caused by consumer spending decreases during the same period. Mortgage banking income increased $1,075,000 for 2020 compared to 2019. The increase in 2020 is a result of historically low rates in 2020 resulting in increased application volume for new purchases and refinancing of existing loans. Net securities gains increased $207,000 in 2020 compared to 2019, while income from Small Business Investment Companies ("SBICs") investments increased $59,000. The year ended December 31, 2020 benefitted from reduced losses on premises and equipment. Other noninterest income for 2020 was reduced by a loss on the sale of repossessed assets of $139,000.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest income:

                

Trust fees

 $3,847  $3,783  $64   1.7%

Service charges on deposit accounts

  2,866   2,455   411   16.7 

Other fees and commissions

  3,693   2,637   1,056   40.0 

Mortgage banking income

  2,439   1,862   577   31.0 

Securities gains, net

  607   123   484   393.5 

Brokerage fees

  721   795   (74)  (9.3)

Income from Small Business Investment Companies

  211   637   (426)  (66.9)

Gains (losses) on premises and equipment, net

  (427)  60   (487)  (811.7)

Other

  1,213   922   291   31.6 

Total noninterest income

 $15,170  $13,274  $1,896   14.3%

Trust fees remained stable while service charges increased $411,000 for 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to the HomeTown acquisition. Other fees and commissions increased $1,056,000 in 2019 compared to 2018, mostly as a result of the acquisition but also from the strength of increased debit card fee revenue. As a result of increased volume, mortgage banking income increased $577,000 in 2019 over 2018. Secondary market mortgage loan volume for 2019 was $102,708,000 compared to $77,739,000 for 2018. Net securities gains were up $484,000, or 393.5%. Income from Small Business Investment Company ("SBIC")SBICs investments decreased $426,000 or 66.9% for 2019 compared to 2018. Net gains (losses) on premises and equipment were a loss of $427,000 for 2019 compared to a gain of $60,000 in 2018. The loss was primarily due to a write-down of carrying value on existing equipment in connection with an ATM replacement initiative.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2018 2017 $ Change % Change
Noninterest income:       
 Trust fees$3,783
 $3,926
 $(143) (3.6)%
 Service charges on deposit accounts2,455
 2,426
 29
 1.2
 Other fees and commissions2,637
 2,471
 166
 6.7
 Mortgage banking income1,862
 2,208
 (346) (15.7)
 Securities gains, net123
 812
 (689) (84.9)
 Brokerage fees795
 829
 (34) (4.1)
 Income from Small Business Investment Companies637
 236
 401
 169.9
 Gains on premises and equipment, net60
 344
 (284) (82.6)
 Other922
 975
 (53) (5.4)
Total noninterest income$13,274
 $14,227
 $(953) (6.7)%
35

For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, noninterest expense increased $21,828,000,decreased $11,509,000, or 49.3%17.4%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Noninterest expense:       
 Salaries$24,672
 $20,509
 $4,163
 20.3 %
 Employee benefits5,343
 4,370
 973
 22.3
 Occupancy and equipment5,417
 4,378
 1,039
 23.7
 FDIC assessment119
 537
 (418) (77.8)
 Bank franchise tax1,644
 1,054
 590
 56.0
 Core deposit intangible amortization1,398
 265
 1,133
 427.5
 Data processing2,567
 1,691
 876
 51.8
 Software1,295
 1,279
 16
 1.3
 Other real estate owned, net31
 122
 (91) (74.6)
 Merger related expenses11,782
 872
 10,910
 1,251.1
 Other11,806
 9,169
 2,637
 28.8
Total noninterest expense$66,074
 $44,246
 $21,828
 49.3 %
2019.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest expense:

                

Salaries and employee benefits

 $29,765  $30,015  $(250)  (0.8)%

Occupancy and equipment

  5,586   5,417   169   3.1 

FDIC assessment

  639   119   520   437.0 

Bank franchise tax

  1,702   1,644   58   3.5 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,637   1,398   239   17.1 

Data processing

  3,017   2,567   450   17.5 

Software

  1,454   1,295   159   12.3 

Other real estate owned, net

  60   31   29   93.5 

Merger related expenses

     11,782   (11,782)  (100.0)

Other

  10,705   11,806   (1,101)  (9.3)

Total noninterest expense

 $54,565  $66,074  $(11,509)  (17.4)%

Salaries expense and employee benefits combineddecreased $250,000 in 2020 as compared to 2019. Total full-time equivalent employees ("FTEs") were 342 at end of 2020, down from 355 at the end of 2019; however, 2020 was impacted by pension and salary expenses resulting from voluntary early retirement package costs. Contributing to the decrease was a reduction in salary expenses of $1.7 million for the deferral of loan costs related to PPP originations. The FDIC assessment expense in 2020 and 2019 was positively impacted by the Small Bank Assessment Credit, which reduced insurance expense $75,000 in 2020 and $492,000 in 2019. Core deposit intangible amortization increased $239,000 in 2020 compared to 2019 due to the HomeTown acquisition. Merger related expenses, which are related to the HomeTown acquisition and are nonrecurring in nature, totaled $11,782,000 during 2019. The increased expense for data processing in 2020 compared to 2019 of $450,000 was attributable to the increased costs as a result of a larger customer base after the HomeTown merger. The decrease in other noninterest expense in 2020 compared to 2019 was primarily due to reduced travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic and increased synergies from the HomeTown acquisition.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest expense:

                

Salaries and employee benefits

 $30,015  $24,879  $5,136   20.6%

Occupancy and equipment

  5,417   4,378   1,039   23.7 

FDIC assessment

  119   537   (418)  (77.8)

Bank franchise tax

  1,644   1,054   590   56.0 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,398   265   1,133   427.5 

Data processing

  2,567   1,691   876   51.8 

Software

  1,295   1,279   16   1.3 

Other real estate owned, net

  31   122   (91)  (74.6)

Merger related expenses

  11,782   872   10,910   1,251.1 

Other

  11,806   9,169   2,637   28.8 

Total noninterest expense

 $66,074  $44,246  $21,828   49.3%

Salaries and employee benefits increased $5,136,000, or 20.46%20.6%, in 2019 compared to 2018. Total full-time equivalent employees ("FTEs")FTEs were 355 at the end of 2019, up from 305 at the end of 2018, for an increase of 50 FTEs primarliyprimarily associated with the HomeTown acquisition. Occupancy and equipment expense increased $1,039,000 in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to the acquisition. The FDIC assessment expense in 2019 was positively impacted by the Small Bank Assessment Credit, which reduced insurance expense $492,000. Core deposit intangible amortization increased $1,133,000 in 2019 compared to 2018, and data processing expense increased $876,000 in 2019 compared to 2018, again as a result of the merger. Merger related expenses, which are related to the HomeTown acquisition and are nonrecurring in nature, totaled $11,782,000 during 2019 compared to $872,000 in 2018.

36

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2018 2017 $ Change % Change
Noninterest expense:       
 Salaries$20,509
 $19,829
 $680
 3.4 %
 Employee benefits4,370
 4,274
 96
 2.2
 Occupancy and equipment4,378
 4,487
 (109) (2.4)
 FDIC assessment537
 538
 (1) (0.2)
 Bank franchise tax1,054
 1,072
 (18) (1.7)
 Core deposit intangible amortization265
 528
 (263) (49.8)
 Data processing1,691
 2,014
 (323) (16.0)
 Software1,279
 1,144
 135
 11.8
 Other real estate owned, net122
 303
 (181) (59.7)
 Merger related expenses872
 
 872
 
 Other9,169
 8,694
 475
 5.5
Total noninterest expense$44,246
 $42,883
 $1,363
 3.2 %

Income taxes on 20192020 earnings amounted to $4,861,000,$7,137,000, resulting in an effective tax rate of 18.9%19.2%, compared to 18.9% in 2019 and 20.0% in 2018 and 41.5% in 2017. Income tax expense for 2017 includes a one-time write-down of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $2.7 million, recorded as2018. As a result of the enactment of the Tax ReformCARES Act, on December 22, 2017.the Company recognized in the first quarter of 2020 a tax benefit for the net operating loss ("NOL") five-year carryback provision for the NOL acquired in the HomeTown merger. The Tax Reform Act reducedrate increased as the Company recognized less tax exempt income in 2020. An income tax benefit was realized for the difference between the current corporate income tax rate of 21% and the higher federal corporate tax rate fromof 35% prior to 21% effective January 1, 2018.

The effective tax rate is lowered by income that is not taxable for federal income tax purposes. The primary non-taxablenontaxable income is from state and municipal securities and loans.

Fair Value Impact to Net Interest Margin
The Company's fully taxable equivalent net interest margin includes the impact of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments. The impact of net accretion for 2017, 2018, and 2019 and the remaining estimated net accretion are reflected in the following table (dollars in thousands):
 Loans Accretion Deposit Accretion Borrowings Amortization Total
For the year ended December 31, 2017$2,236
 $
 $(122) $2,114
For the year ended December 31, 20181,390
 
 (102) 1,288
For the year ended December 31, 20193,101
 375
 (89) 3,387
For the years ending (estimated):       
20201,871
 181
 (84) 1,968
20211,503
 78
 (102) 1,479
20221,032
 50
 (102) 980
2023729
 30
 (102) 657
2024468
 5
 (102) 371
Thereafter2,471
 5
 (845) 1,631

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The majority of assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature and therefore differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. The most significant effect of inflation is on noninterest expenses that tend to rise during periods of inflation. Changes in interest rates have a greater impact on a financial institution's profitability than do the effects of higher costs for goods and services. Through its balance sheet management practices, the Company has the ability to react to those changes and measure and monitor its interest rate and liquidity risk.

Market Risk Management

Effectively managing market risk is essential to achieving the Company's financial objectives. Market risk reflects the risk of economic loss resulting from changes in interest rates and market prices. The Company is generally not subject to currency exchange risk or commodity price risk. The Company's primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk; however, market risk also includes liquidity risk. Both are discussed in the following sections.

Interest Rate Risk Management

Interest rate risk and its impact on net interest income is a primary market risk exposure. The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies approved by its Asset Liability Committee ("ALCO") and Board of Directors, both of which receive and review periodic reports of the Company's interest rate risk position.

The Company uses computer simulation analysis to measure the sensitivity of projected earnings to changes in interest rates. Simulation takes into account current balance sheet volumes and the scheduled repricing dates, instrument level optionality, and maturities of assets and liabilities. It incorporates numerous assumptions including growth, changes in the mix of assets and liabilities, prepayments, and average rates earned and paid. Based on this information, management uses the model to project net interest income under multiple interest rate scenarios.


A balance sheet is considered asset sensitive when its earning assets (loans and securities) reprice faster or to a greater extent than its liabilities (deposits and borrowings). An asset sensitive balance sheet will produce relatively more net interest income when interest rates rise and less net interest income when they decline. Based on the Company's simulation analysis, management believes the Company's interest sensitivity position at December 31, 20192020 is asset sensitive. 

Earnings Simulation

The table below shows the estimated impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income as of December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands), assuming gradualinstantaneous and parallel changes in interest rates, and consistent levels of assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the following twelve months is projected to increase when interest rates are higher than current rates.

Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income

  

December 31, 2020

 
  

Change in net interest income

 

Change in interest rates

 

Amount

  

Percent

 
         

Up 4.0%

 $10,976   13.8%

Up 3.0%

  8,247   10.4 

Up 2.0%

  5,446   6.8 

Up 1.0%

  2,676   3.4 

Flat

      

Down 0.25%

  (448)  (0.6)

Down 1.00% (1)

  (1,133)  (1.4)

__________________________

(1) This scenario is deemed invalid at this time due to the current low interest rate environment.

37

 December 31, 2019
 Change in net interest income
Change in interest ratesAmount Percent
    
Up  4.0%$10,860
 13.1%
Up  3.0%8,267
 10.0
Up  2.0%5,615
 6.8
Up  1.0%2,877
 3.5
Flat
 
Down 0.25%(659) (0.8)
Down 0.50%(3,681) (4.5)

Management cannot predict future interest rates or their exact effect on net interest income. Computations of future effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Certain limitations are inherent in such computations. Assets and liabilities may react differently than projected to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag changes in market interest rates. Interest rate shifts may not be parallel.

Changes in interest rates can cause substantial changes in the amount of prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities, which may in turn affect the Company's interest rate sensitivity position. Additionally, credit risk may rise if an interest rate increase adversely affects the ability of borrowers to service their debt.

Economic Value Simulation

Economic value simulation is used to calculate the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities over different interest rate environments. Economic values are calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis. The net economic value of equity is the economic value of all assets minus the economic value of all liabilities. The change in net economic value over different rate environments is an indication of the longer-term earnings capability of the balance sheet. The same assumptions are used in the economic value simulation as in the earnings simulation. The economic value simulation uses instantaneous rate shocks to the balance sheet.

The following table reflects the estimated change in net economic value over different rate environments using economic value simulation for the balances at the period ended December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands):

Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity

 December 31, 2019
Change in interest ratesAmount $ Change % Change
      
Up 4.0%$424,956
 $131,657
 44.9%
Up 3.0%405,360
 112,061
 38.2
Up 2.0%379,684
 86,385
 29.5
Up 1.0%345,074
 51,775
 17.7
Flat293,299
 
 
Down 0.25%279,435
 (13,864) (4.7)
Down 0.50%232,969
 (60,330) (20.6)

  

December 31, 2020

 

Change in interest rates

 

Amount

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
             

Up 4.0%

 $414,016  $192,052   86.5%

Up 3.0%

  379,029   157,065   70.8 

Up 2.0%

  337,336   115,372   52.0 

Up 1.0%

  284,837   62,873   28.3 

Flat

  221,964       

Down 0.25%

  198,836   (23,128)  (10.4)

Down 1.00% (1)

  111,512   (110,452)  (49.8)

__________________________

(1) This scenario is deemed invalid at this time due to the current low interest rate environment.

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity is the ability of the Company in a timely manner to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss and to raise additional funds by increasing liabilities. Liquidity management involves maintaining the Company's ability to meet the daily cash flow requirements of its customers, whether they are borrowers requiring funds or depositors desiring to withdraw funds. Additionally, the Company requires cash for various operating needs including dividends to shareholders, the servicing of debt, and the payment of general corporate expenses. The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and liquidity needs through policies approved by the ALCO and Board of Directors, both of which receive periodic reports of the Company's interest rate risk and liquidity position. The Company uses a computer simulation model to assist in the management of the future liquidity needs of the Company.

Liquidity sources include on balance sheet and off balance sheet sources.

Balance sheet liquidity sources include cash, amounts due from banks, loan repayments, bond maturities and calls, and increases in deposits. Further, the Company maintains a large, high quality, very liquid bond portfolio, which is generally 50% to 60% unpledged and would, accordingly, be available for sale if necessary.

Off balance sheet sources include lines of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB"), federal funds lines of credit, and access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's discount window.

The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB, equal to 30% of the Company's assets, subject to the amount of collateral pledged. Under the terms of its collateral agreement with the FHLB, the Company provides a blanket lien covering all of its residential first mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans and commercial construction loans. In addition, the Company pledges as collateral its capital stock in and deposits with the FHLB. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, there were no principal advance obligations to the FHLB. The Company had outstanding $170,000,000$245,000,000 in FHLB letters of credit at December 31, 20192020 compared to $190,250,000$170,000,000 in letters of credit at December 31, 2018.2019. The letters of credit provide the Bank with additional collateral for securing public entity deposits above FDIC insurance levels, thereby providing less need for collateral pledging from the securities portfolio and accordingly increasing the Company's balance sheet liquidity.

Short-term borrowing is discussed in Note 11 and long-term borrowing is discussed in Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company has federal funds lines of credit established with one correspondent bankbanks in the amount of $15,000,000 and another correspondent bank in the amount of $10,000,000,$60,000,000 and has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's discount window. There were no amounts outstanding under these facilities at December 31, 2019.2020. The Company, through its subsidiary bank, has a relationship with Promontory Network, the sponsoring entity for the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® ("CDARS"). Through CDARS, the Company is able to provide deposit customers with access to aggregate FDIC insurance in amounts far exceeding $250,000. This gives the Company the ability, as and when needed, to attract and retain large deposits from insurance sensitive customers. Under the EGRRCPA signed into law on May 24, 2018, a well-capitalized bank with a CAMELS rating of 1 or 2 may hold reciprocal deposits up to the lesser of 20% of its total liabilities or $5 billion without those deposits being treated as brokered deposits. With CDARS, the Company has the option to keep deposits on balance sheet or sell them to other members of the network. Additionally, subject to certain limits, the Company can use CDARS to purchase cost-effective funding without collateralization and in lieu of generating funds through traditional brokered CDs or the FHLB. Thus, CDARS serves as a deposit-gathering tool and an additional liquidity management tool. Deposits through the CDARS program as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $4,342,000 and 2018 were $14,864,000, and $22,431,000, respectively.

The Bank also participates with the Promontory Network using Insured Cash Sweep®, a product which provides the Bank the capability of providing additional deposit insurance to customers in the context of a money market account arrangement. The product is analogous to the CDARS product discussed above.

COVID-19 and the participation in the PPP and the DAP programs could significantly impact the Company's liquidity. Average deposits grew 22.3% in 2020 compared to 2019, partially due to customer deposits of loan proceeds from participation in the PPP program. Customers have continued to maintain higher cash balances throughout the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2020 as future liquidity needs remain uncertain. This buildup of cash reserves primarily accounts for the significant increase over the same period of 2019. Management believes that these sourcesthe resources available to the Company will provide sufficient and timely liquidity, both on and off the balance sheet.sheet to support the programs and operations.

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Securities

The securities portfolio generates income, plays a strategic role in the management of interest rate sensitivity, provides a source of liquidity, and is used to meet collateral requirements. The securities portfolio consists of high quality investments, mostly federal agency, mortgage-backed, and state and municipal securities.

The Company is cognizant of the continuing historically low and currently decreasing to stablesteady rate environment and has elected to execute an asset liability strategy of purchasing high quality taxable securities with relatively low optionality and short and overall balanced duration.

39


average life than previously held. The objective is to improve yield and duration on the portfolio in advance of any major market moves. During 2019, indications were that market rates had peaked and the yield curve had flattened.

The following table presents information on the amortized cost, maturities, and taxable equivalent yields of available for sale securities at the end of the last three years (dollars in thousands):

 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Taxable
Equivalent
Yield
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Taxable
Equivalent
Yield
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Taxable
Equivalent
Yield
U. S. Treasury           
Within 1 year$14,992
 1.52% $
 % $
 %
1 to 5 years
 
 
 
 
 
5 to 10 years
 
 
 
 
 
Over 10 years
 
 
 
 
 
Total14,992
 1.52
 
 
 
 
            
Federal Agencies:           
Within 1 year24,987
 1.52
 
 
 7,001
 1.49
1 to 5 years24,920
 2.28
 68,786
 2.27
 48,789
 1.91
5 to 10 years46,946
 2.71
 55,797
 2.66
 45,973
 2.23
Over 10 years29,976
 2.32
 12,487
 2.05
 12,483
 2.02
Total126,829
 2.30
 137,070
 2.40
 114,246
 2.02
            
Mortgage-backed: 
  
  
  
  
  
Within 1 year73
 3.26
 72
 3.14
 
 
1 to 5 years2,794
 2.84
 2,946
 2.62
 2,770
 2.59
5 to 10 years38,993
 2.27
 36,241
 2.44
 22,849
 2.29
Over 10 years140,872
 2.46
 74,624
 2.54
 80,544
 2.28
Total182,732
 2.42
 113,883
 2.51
 106,163
 2.29
            
State and Municipal: 
  
  
  
  
  
Within 1 year1,255
 3.85
 6,872
 2.25
 4,539
 2.73
1 to 5 years25,619
 2.72
 46,287
 2.93
 52,975
 3.52
5 to 10 years9,086
 2.82
 20,199
 2.82
 27,411
 3.77
Over 10 years5,467
 3.50
 6,664
 2.71
 7,786
 3.03
Total41,427
 2.88
 80,022
 2.82
 92,711
 3.52
            
Corporate Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
Within 1 year
 
 
 
 
 
1 to 5 years500
 2.42
 500
 2.42
 1,042
 1.50
5 to 10 years505
 5.28
 
 
 500
 2.42
Over 10 years8,509
 5.56
 6,299
 5.41
 6,300
 5.41
Total9,514
 5.38
 6,799
 4.70
 7,842
 4.70
            
Common Stock: 
  
  
  
  
  
No maturity
 
 
 
 1,383
 
Total
 
 
 
 1,383
 
            
Total portfolio$375,494
 2.47% $337,774
 2.59% $322,345
 2.60%

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
      

Taxable

      

Taxable

      

Taxable

 
  

Amortized

  

Equivalent

  

Amortized

  

Equivalent

  

Amortized

  

Equivalent

 
  

Cost

  

Yield

  

Cost

  

Yield

  

Cost

  

Yield

 

U. S. Treasury

                        

Within 1 year

 $34,997   0.08% $14,992   1.52% $   %

1 to 5 years

                  

5 to 10 years

                  

Over 10 years

                  

Total

  34,997   0.08   14,992   1.52       
        ��                

Federal Agencies:

                        

Within 1 year

  86   2.68   24,987   1.52       

1 to 5 years

  65,553   0.62   24,920   2.28   68,786   2.27 

5 to 10 years

  24,742   1.99   46,946   2.71   55,797   2.66 

Over 10 years

  13,711   2.18   29,976   2.32   12,487   2.05 

Total

  104,092   1.15   126,829   2.30   137,070   2.40 
                         

Mortgage-backed:

                        

Within 1 year

  30   2.42   73   3.26   72   3.14 

1 to 5 years

  6,368   1.41   2,794   2.84   2,946   2.62 

5 to 10 years

  92,590   1.40   38,993   2.27   36,241   2.44 

Over 10 years

  147,782   1.61   140,872   2.46   74,624   2.54 

Total

  246,770   1.53   182,732   2.42   113,883   2.51 
                         

State and Municipal:

                        

Within 1 year

  2,998   2.47   1,255   3.85   6,872   2.25 

1 to 5 years

  30,852   2.13   25,619   2.72   46,287   2.93 

5 to 10 years

  15,371   2.02   9,086   2.82   20,199   2.82 

Over 10 years

  7,901   2.93   5,467   3.50   6,664   2.71 

Total

  57,122   2.23   41,427   2.88   80,022   2.82 
                         

Corporate Securities:

                        

Within 1 year

                  

1 to 5 years

  500   2.42   500   2.42   500   2.42 

5 to 10 years

  12,511   5.11   505   5.28       

Over 10 years

        8,509   5.56   6,299   5.41 

Total

  13,011   5.01   9,514   5.38   6,799   4.70 
                         

Total portfolio

 $455,992   1.52% $375,494   2.47% $337,774   2.59%

The Company adopted ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018 and had no equity securities at December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company recognized in income $333,000 of unrealized holding gains during 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold $445,000 in equity securities at fair value.

The loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial and residential real estate loans, commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses, construction and land development loans, and home equity loans.

 At December 31, 2020, the commercial real estate portfolio included concentrations of $75,235,000, $44,738,000 and $190,840,000 in hotel, restaurants, and retail, respectively. The concentrations total 15.5% of total loans, excluding loans in process.

Average loans increased $310,962,000, or 18.2%, from 2019 to 2020, primarily related to PPP lending. Average loans increased $371,432,000, or 27.9%, from 2018 to 2019, mostly impacted by the HomeTown merger. Average loans increased $67,418,000, or 5.3%, from 2017 to 2018.

At December 31, 2019,2020, total loans, net of deferred fees and costs, were $1,830,815,000,$2,015,056,000, an increase of $473,339,000,$184,241,000, or 34.9%10.1%, from the prior year. Of this increase, $444,324,000 was related to the HomeTown merger, and $29,015,000 represents growth throughout the restExcluding PPP loans of the franchise.

$211,275,000 at December 31, 2020, loans held for investment were slightly lower year over year.

Loans held for sale and associated with secondary mortgage activity totaled $15,591,000 at December 31, 2020 and $2,027,000 at December 31, 2019 and $640,000 at December 31, 2018.2019. Loan production volume was $165,755,000 and $102,708,000 for 2020 and $77,739,000 for 2019, and 2018, respectively. These loans were approximately 40% purchase, 60% refinancing for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to approximately 60% purchase, 40% refinancing.

refinancing for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Management of the loan portfolio is organized around portfolio segments. Each segment is comprised of various loan types that are reflective of operational and regulatory reporting requirements. The following table presents the Company's portfolio as of the dates indicated by segment (dollars in thousands): 

Loans

 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Real estate:         
Construction and land development$137,920
 $97,240
 $123,147
 $114,258
 $72,968
Commercial real estate899,199
 655,800
 637,701
 510,960
 430,186
Residential real estate324,315
 209,438
 209,326
 215,104
 220,434
Home equity119,423
 103,933
 109,857
 110,751
 98,449
Total real estate1,480,857
 1,066,411
 1,080,031
 951,073
 822,037
          
Commercial and industrial339,077
 285,972
 251,666
 208,717
 177,481
Consumer10,881
 5,093
 4,428
 5,031
 6,007
          
Total loans$1,830,815
 $1,357,476
 $1,336,125
 $1,164,821
 $1,005,525

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

 $140,071  $137,920  $97,240  $123,147  $114,258 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  373,680   360,991   255,863   234,922   224,364 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  627,569   538,208   399,937   402,779   286,596 

Residential real estate

  269,137   324,315   209,438   209,326   215,104 

Home equity

  104,881   119,423   103,933   109,857   110,751 

Total real estate

  1,515,338   1,480,857   1,066,411   1,080,031   951,073 
                     

Commercial and industrial

  491,256   339,077   285,972   251,666   208,717 

Consumer

  8,462   10,881   5,093   4,428   5,031 
                     

Total loans, net of deferred fees and costs

 $2,015,056  $1,830,815  $1,357,476  $1,336,125  $1,164,821 

The following table provides loan balance information by geographic regions. In some circumstances, loans may be originated in one region for borrowers located in other regions (dollars in thousands):

Loans by Geographic Region

  

December 31, 2020

  

Percentage Change in Balance Since

 
      

Percentage

  

December 31,

 
  

Balance

  

of Portfolio

  

2019

 

Danville region

 $250,653   12.4%  13.6%

Central region

  127,487   6.3   (7.5)

Southside region

  82,443   4.1   19.1 

Eastern region

  104,474   5.2   11.6 

Franklin region

  136,587   6.8   13.7 

Roanoke region

  429,553   21.3   1.3 

New River Valley region

  131,021   6.5   15.7 

Alamance region

  274,912   13.7   (3.9)

Guilford region

  312,736   15.5   13.4 

Winston-Salem region

  116,186   5.8   28.9 
Triangle region  49,004   2.4   100.0 
             

Total loans, net of deferred fees and costs

 $2,015,056   100.0%  10.1%

41

 As of December 31, 2019 
Percentage Change
in Balance Since
December 31, 2018
Balance 
Percentage
of Portfolio
 
Danville region$220,650
 12.0% 0.6%
Central region137,822
 7.5
 (8.3)
Southside region69,248
 3.8
 (2.1)
Eastern region93,651
 5.1
 0.4
Franklin region120,139
 6.6
 8.5
Roanoke region424,086
 23.2
 264.9
New River Valley region113,223
 6.2
 100.0
Alamance region286,035
 15.6
 8.8
Guilford region275,819
 15.1
 3.5
Winston-Salem region90,142
 4.9
 34.0
      
Total loans$1,830,815
 100.0% 34.9%

The Danville region consists of offices in Danville, Virginia and Yanceyville, North Carolina. The Central region consists of offices in Lynchburg, and Campbell County, Virginia. The Southside region consists of offices in Martinsville and Henry


County, Virginia. The Eastern region consists of offices in South Boston and the counties of Halifax and Pittsylvania, Virginia. The Franklin region consists of offices in Rocky Mount and Hardy, Virginia. The Roanoke region consists of offices in Roanoke, Salem, and Roanoke County, Virginia. The New River Valley region consists of an office in Christiansburg, Virginia. The Alamance region consists of offices in Burlington, Graham, and Mebane, North Carolina. The Guilford region consists of offices in Greensboro, North Carolina. The Winston-Salem region consists of an office in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
 The Triangle region consists of an office in Raleigh, North Carolina.

The Company does not participate in or have any highly leveraged lending transactions, as defined by bank regulations. The Company has no foreign loans. There were no concentrations of loans to any individual, group of individuals, business, or industry that exceeded 10% of total loans at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.

2019.

The following table presents the maturity schedule of selected loan types (dollars in thousands):

Maturities of Selected Loan Types

December 31, 2019

 
Commercial
and
Industrial (1)
 
Construction
and Land
Development
 Total
1 year or less$122,535
 $25,136
 $147,671
1 to 5 years (2)149,971
 95,295
 245,266
After 5 years (2)66,571
 17,489
 84,060
Total$339,077
 $137,920
 $476,997
______________________
2020

  

Commercial

  

Construction

     
  

and

  

and Land

     
  

Industrial (1)

  

Development

  

Total

 

1 year or less

 $63,796  $24,745  $88,541 

1 to 5 years (2)

  353,258   102,974   456,232 

After 5 years (2)

  74,202   12,352   86,554 

Total

 $491,256  $140,071  $631,327 

__________________________

(1)

(1)

Includes agricultural loans.

(2)

(2)

Of the loans due after one year, $265,967$459,488 have predetermined interest rates and $63,359$83,298 have floating or adjustable interest rates.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company had a provision for loan losses of $456,000$8,916,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, compared to a provision for loan losses of $456,000 and a negative provision for loan losses of $103,000 and a provision for loan losses of $1,016,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The larger provision for 2020 reflects an increase in allowance requirements in response to the declining and 2017, respectively.

uncertain economic landscape caused by the COVID-19 pandemic during the period. The increase in 2020 can be attributed to a measurable increase in qualitative factors related to significant contractions in economic data for both national and local economies and a significant increase in unemployment rates. The provision for 2019 primarily related to a $156,000 increase in the impaired loan reserve and loan growth during the fourth quarter of 2019. The negative provision for 2018 related to favorable adjustments on the purchased credit impaired loan loss allowance. The larger provision for 2017 related to continued loan growth but was mitigated by continued strong asset quality metrics and improving local and national economic indicators.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of the ALLL is to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and by recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Loan charge-offs decrease the allowance.

The ALLL was $21,403,000, $13,152,000, $12,805,000, and $13,603,000$12,805,000 at December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, respectively. The ALLL as a percentage of loans at each of those dates was 0.72%1.06%, 0.94%0.72%, and 1.02%0.94%, respectively.

 Excluding PPP loans, the allowance as a percentage of loans increased to 1.19% at December 31, 2020.

The increase in the allowance as a percentage of loans during 2020 as compared to 2019 was primarily due to the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The decrease in the allowance as a percentage of loans during 2019 as compared to 2018 and 2017 was primarily due to the acquired loan portfolio of HomeTown recorded at fair value with no continuing allowance and the continued high asset quality, low charge-offs, and improvement in various qualitative factors, notably economic, used in the determination of the allowance.

In an effort to better evaluate the adequacy of its ALLL, the Company computes its ASC 450, Contingencies, loan balance by reducing total loans by acquired loans and loans that were evaluated for impairment individually or smaller balance nonaccrual loans evaluated for impairment in homogeneous pools. It also adjusts its ASC 450 loan loss reserve balance total by removing allowances associated with these other pools of loans.

The general allowance, ASC 450 (FAS 5) reserves to ASC 450 loans, was 1.16% at December 31, 2020, compared to 0.87% at December 31, 2019, compared to 0.94% at December 31, 2018.2019. On a dollar basis, the reserve was $20,534,000 at December 31, 2020, compared to $12,684,000 at December 31, 2019, compared to $12,560,000 at December 31, 2018.2019. The percentage of the reserve to total loans has declinedincreased due to improving local and national economic


conditions and continued improvement in asset quality metrics. uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. This segment of the allowance represents by far the largest portion of the loan portfolio and the largest aggregate risk.

The specific allowance, ASC 310-40 (FAS 114) reserves to ASC 310-40 loans, was 1.06% at December 31, 2020, compared to 10.51% at December 31, 2019, compared to 4.78% at December 31, 2018.2019. On a dollar basis, the reserve was $30,000 at December 31, 2020, compared to $230,000 at December 31, 2019, compared to $64,000 at December 31, 2018.2019. There is ongoing turnover in the composition of the impaired loan population, which increased $858,000$660,000 from December 31, 2018.

2019. The decrease in the specific allowance from the prior year is primarily due to the write-off of the specific reserves on two loans for which we have received a commitment to purchase.

The specific allowance does not include reserves related to acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality. This reserve was $839,000 at December 31, 2020, compared to $238,000 at December 31, 2019, compared to $181,000 at December 31, 2018.2019. This is the only portion of the reserve related to acquired loans. Cash flow expectations for these loans are reviewed on a quarterly basis and unfavorable changes in those estimates relative to the initial estimates can result in the need for specific loan loss provisions.

The following table presents the Company's loan loss and recovery experience for the past five years (dollars in thousands):

Summary of Loan Loss Experience

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Balance at beginning of period

 $13,152  $12,805  $13,603  $12,801  $12,601 
                     

Charge-offs:

                    

Construction and land development

           35    

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  17   6   11   55    
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  165         3   10 

Residential real estate

  90   20      159   21 

Home equity

  27   50   86   13   66 

Total real estate

  299   76   97   265   97 

Commercial and industrial

  505   12   787   282   40 

Consumer

  202   245   136   143   189 

Total charge-offs

  1,006   333   1,020   690   326 
                     

Recoveries:

                    

Construction and land development

  2      4   43   11 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  12   9   6   3   3 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  50         14   18 

Residential real estate

  63   40   45   45   53 

Home equity

  22   18   104   40   15 

Total real estate

  149   67   159   145   100 

Commercial and industrial

  65   13   69   223   40 

Consumer

  127   144   97   108   136 

Total recoveries

  341   224   325   476   276 
                     

Net charge-offs

  665   109   695   214   50 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  8,916   456   (103)  1,016   250 

Balance at end of period

 $21,403  $13,152  $12,805  $13,603  $12,801 

43

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Balance at beginning of period $12,805
 $13,603
 $12,801
 $12,601
 $12,427
           
Charge-offs:  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development 
 
 35
 
 20
Commercial real estate 6
 11
 58
 10
 462
Residential real estate 20
 
 159
 21
 15
Home equity 50
 86
 13
 66
 308
Total real estate 76
 97
 265
 97
 805
Commercial and industrial 12
 787
 282
 40
 175
Consumer 245
 136
 143
 189
 220
Total charge-offs 333
 1,020
 690
 326
 1,200
           
Recoveries:  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development 
 4
 43
 11
 81
Commercial real estate 9
 6
 17
 21
 43
Residential real estate 40
 45
 45
 53
 121
Home equity 18
 104
 40
 15
 18
Total real estate 67
 159
 145
 100
 263
Commercial and industrial 13
 69
 223
 40
 32
Consumer 144
 97
 108
 136
 129
Total recoveries 224
 325
 476
 276
 424
           
Net charge-offs 109
 695
 214
 50
 776
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses 456
 (103) 1,016
 250
 950
Balance at end of period $13,152
 $12,805
 $13,603
 $12,801
 $12,601

The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by major portfolio segments for the past five years (dollars in thousands):

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
 Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount %
                    
Commercial$2,657
 18.5% $2,537
 21.0% $2,413
 18.8% $2,095
 17.9% $2,065
 17.7%
                    
Commercial real estate7,416
 56.7
 7,246
 55.5
 8,321
 57.0
 7,355
 53.7
 6,930
 50.0
                    
Residential real estate3,023
 24.2
 2,977
 23.1
 2,825
 23.9
 3,303
 28.0
 3,546
 31.7
                    
Consumer56
 0.6
 45
 0.4
 44
 0.3
 48
 0.4
 60
 0.6
                    
Total$13,152
 100.0% $12,805
 100.0% $13,603
 100.0% $12,801
 100.0% $12,601
 100.0%

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 
  

Amount

  

%

  

Amount

  

%

  

Amount

  

%

  

Amount

  

%

  

Amount

  

%

 
                                         

Commercial

 $3,373   24.4% $2,657   18.5% $2,537   21.0% $2,413   18.8% $2,095   17.9%
                                         
Construction and land development  1,927   7.0   1,161   7.6   1,059   7.2   1,401   9.2   1,378   9.8 
                                         

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  4,340   18.5   2,474   19.7   2,420   18.8   2,668   17.6   2,537   19.3 
                                         
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  7,626   31.1   3,781   29.4   3,767   29.5   4,252   30.2   3,440   24.6 
                                         

Residential real estate

  4,067   18.6   3,023   24.2   2,977   23.1   2,825   23.9   3,303   28.0 
                                         

Consumer

  70   0.4   56   0.6   45   0.4   44   0.3   48   0.4 
                                         

Total

 $21,403   100.0% $13,152   100.0% $12,805   100.0% $13,603   100.0% $12,801   100.0%

__________________________

% - represents the percentage of loans in each category to total loans.

Asset Quality Indicators

The following table provides certain qualitative indicators relevant to the Company's loan portfolio for the past five years.

Asset Quality Ratios
 As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Allowance to loans0.72% 0.94% 1.02% 1.10% 1.25%
ASC 450/general allowance0.87
 0.94
 1.04
 1.17
 1.40
Net charge-offs to year-end allowance0.83
 5.43
 1.57
 0.39
 6.16
Net charge-offs to average loans0.01
 0.05
 0.02
 0.00
 0.08
Nonperforming assets to total assets0.15
 0.11
 0.21
 0.29
 0.48
Nonperforming loans to loans0.13
 0.09
 0.19
 0.30
 0.52
Provision to net charge-offs (recoveries)418.35
 (14.82) 474.77
 500.00
 122.42
Provision to average loans0.03
 (0.01) 0.08
 0.02
 0.10
Allowance to nonperforming loans570.59
 1,101.98
 531.37
 360.39
 242.09

Asset Quality Ratios

  

As of or for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Allowance to loans (1)

  1.06%  0.72%  0.94%  1.02%  1.10%

ASC 450/general allowance (2)

  1.16   0.87   0.94   1.04   1.17 

Net charge-offs to year-end allowance

  3.11   0.83   5.43   1.57   0.39 

Net charge-offs to average loans

  0.03   0.01   0.05   0.02   0.00 

Nonperforming assets to total assets

  0.12   0.15   0.11   0.21   0.29 

Nonperforming loans to loans

  0.13   0.13   0.09   0.19   0.30 

Provision to net charge-offs (recoveries)

  1,340.75   418.35   (14.82)  474.77   500.00 

Provision to average loans

  0.44   0.03   (0.01)  0.08   0.02 

Allowance to nonperforming loans

  793.88   570.59   1,101.98   531.37   360.39 

__________________________

(1) Excluding PPP loans, 1.19%

 (2) Excluding PPP loans, 1.32%

Nonperforming Assets (Loans and Other Real Estate Owned)

Nonperforming loans include loans on which interest is no longer accrued and accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more. Nonperforming loans include loans originated and loans acquired.

acquired exclusive of purchased credit impaired loans.

Nonperforming loans to total loans were 0.13% at both December 31, 2019 compared to 0.09% at2020 and December 31, 2018.2019. The increase in nonperforming loans during 20192020 was $1,143,000.

$391,000.

Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate. Nonperforming assets represented 0.15%0.12% at December 31, 20192020 compared to 0.11%0.15% of total assets at December 31, 2018.2019. The Company continues to monitor the significant impact to its borrowers caused by COVID-19 and anticipates increases in nonperforming assets as a result, but the total cannot be determined at this time.

In most cases, it is the policy of the Company that any loan that becomes 90 days past due will automatically be placed on nonaccrual loan status, accrued interest reversed out of income, and further interest accrual ceased. Any payments received on such loans will be credited to principal. In some cases a loan in process of renewal may become 90 days past due. In these instances the loan may still be accruing because of a delayed renewal process in which the customer has not been billed. In accounting for acquired impaired loans, such loans are not classified as nonaccrual when they become 90 days past due. They are considered to be accruing because their interest income relates to the accretable yield and not to contractual interest payments.

Loans will only be restored to full accrual status after six consecutive months of payments that were each less than 30 days delinquent. The Company strictly adheres with this policy before restoring a loan to normal accrual status.


The following table presents the Company's nonperforming asset history, including acquired impaired loans as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Nonperforming Assets

 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Nonaccrual loans:         
Real estate$1,083
 $1,007
 $2,111
 $2,928
 $5,022
Commercial857
 83
 90
 19
 90
Consumer4
 
 
 18
 2
Total nonaccrual loans1,944
 1,090
 2,201
 2,965
 5,114
          
Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest: 
  
  
  
  
Real estate309
 72
 359
 587
 84
Commercial52
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 
 
 7
Total past due loans361
 72
 359
 587
 91
          
Total nonperforming loans2,305
 1,162
 2,560
 3,552
 5,205
          
Other real estate owned, net1,308
 869
 1,225
 1,328
 2,184
          
Total nonperforming assets$3,613
 $2,031
 $3,785
 $4,880
 $7,389

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Nonaccrual loans:

                    

Real estate

 $2,328  $1,083  $1,007  $2,111  $2,928 

Commercial

  100   857   83   90   19 

Consumer

  6   4         18 

Total nonaccrual loans

  2,434   1,944   1,090   2,201   2,965 
                     

Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest:

                    

Real estate

  262   309   72   359   587 

Commercial

     52          

Consumer

               

Total past due loans

  262   361   72   359   587 
                     

Total nonperforming loans

  2,696   2,305   1,162   2,560   3,552 
                     

Other real estate owned, net

  958   1,308   869   1,225   1,328 
                     

Total nonperforming assets

 $3,654  $3,613  $2,031  $3,785  $4,880 

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The following table shows loans that were considered impaired, exclusive of purchased credit impaired loans, as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Impaired Loans

 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Accruing$969
 $848
 $1,016
 $2,059
 $1,171
On nonaccrual status1,223
 486
 2,201
 2,785
 3,536
Total impaired loans$2,192
 $1,334
 $3,217
 $4,844
 $4,707

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Accruing

 $758  $969  $848  $1,016  $2,059 

On nonaccrual status

  2,094   1,223   486   2,201   2,785 

Total impaired loans

 $2,852  $2,192  $1,334  $3,217  $4,844 

Troubled Debt Restructurings ("TDRs")

TDRs exist whenever the Company makes a concession to a customer based on the customer's financial distress that would not have otherwise been made in the normal course of business.

There were $1,058,000$1,976,000 in TDRs at December 31, 20192020 compared to $1,090,000$1,058,000 at December 31, 2018.2019.

In March 2020 (revised in April 2020), the federal banking agencies issued an "Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus." This was in response to the COVID-19 pandemic affecting societies and economies around the world. This guidance encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. The guidance explains that, in consultation with the FASB staff, the federal banking agencies have concluded that short-term modifications (e.g. six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current as of the implementation date of a relief program are not TDR. The CARES Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on March 27, 2020. Section 4013 of the CARES Act also addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that COVID-19 related modifications on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 were not TDRs. The Bank implemented a DAP to provide relief to its borrowers under this guidance. The Bank provided assistance to customers with loan balances of $405.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. 

Other Real Estate Owned

OREO is carried on the consolidated balance sheets at $1,308,000$958,000 and $869,000$1,308,000 as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. Foreclosed assets are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell, at the date of foreclosure. Loan losses resulting from foreclosure are charged against the ALLL at that time. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management, and the assets are carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value, less estimated costs to sell, with any additional write-downs charged against earnings. For significant assets, these valuations are typically outside annual appraisals. 


The following table shows OREO as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Construction and land development$600
 $78
 $318
 $139
 $886
1-4 family residential285
 719
 629
 653
 643
Commercial real estate423
 72
 278
 536
 655
  Total OREO$1,308
 $869
 $1,225
 $1,328
 $2,184

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Construction and land development

 $443  $600  $78  $318  $139 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  230   390      173   375 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied     33   72   105   161 

Residential real estate

  237   285   719   629   250 
Home equity  48            403 

Total OREO

 $958  $1,308  $869  $1,225  $1,328 

Deposits

The Company's deposits consist primarily of checking, money market, savings, and consumer and commercial time deposits. Average deposits increased $427,156,000, or 22.3%, in 2020, mostly a result of continued higher than average cash balances being maintained by customers as the uncertainty of the pandemic continues and is a trend that is consistent for all commercial banks. Average deposits increased $359,158,000, or 23.1%, infrom 2018 to 2019, mostly impacted by the HomeTown merger. Average deposits increased $101,857,000, or 7.0%, from 2017 to 2018. 

Period-end total deposits increased $494,320,000,$550,783,000, or 31.6%26.7%, during 2019. Of this increase, $483,626,000 was related2020. Customers have continued to the HomeTown merger, and $10,694,000 represents growth throughout the rest of the franchise.maintain higher cash balances as future liquidity needs remain uncertain. The Company has only a relatively small portion of its time deposits provided by wholesale sources. These include time deposits through the CDARS program, which at year end totaled $4,342,000 for 2020, $14,864,000 for 2019, and $22,431,000 for 2018, and $25,838,000 for 2017.2018. Management considers the CDARS deposits the functional though not regulatory, equivalent of core deposits because they relate to balances derived from customers with long standing relationships with the Company.

Average deposits and rates for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):

Deposits

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
  

Average

      

Average

      

Average

     
  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

 

Noninterest bearing deposits

 $746,659   % $537,775   % $421,527   %

Interest bearing accounts:

                        

NOW accounts

 $386,790   0.09% $307,329   0.12% $234,857   0.02%

Money market

  574,510   0.46   445,505   1.18   393,321   0.89 

Savings

  198,313   0.06   166,842   0.17   132,182   0.03 

Time

  436,081   1.52   457,746   1.58   374,152   1.20 

Total interest bearing deposits

 $1,595,694   0.61% $1,377,422   0.95% $1,134,512   0.71%

Average total deposits

 $2,342,353   0.42% $1,915,197   0.68% $1,556,039   0.52%

Deposits
46

 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 
Average
Balance
 Rate Average
Balance
 Rate Average
Balance
 Rate
Noninterest bearing deposits$537,775
 % $421,527
 % $392,663
 %
Interest bearing accounts: 
  
  
  
  
  
NOW accounts$307,329
 0.12% $234,857
 0.02% $217,833
 0.02%
Money market445,505
 1.18
 393,321
 0.89
 335,085
 0.50
Savings166,842
 0.17
 132,182
 0.03
 125,157
 0.03
Time457,746
 1.58
 374,152
 1.20
 383,444
 1.05
Total interest bearing deposits$1,377,422
 0.95% $1,134,512
 0.71% $1,061,519
 0.55%
Average total deposits$1,915,197
 0.68% $1,556,039
 0.52% $1,454,182
 0.40%

Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More

Certificates of deposit at December 31, 20192020 in amounts of $100,000 or more were classified by maturity as follows (dollars in thousands):

 December 31, 2019
3 months or less$53,493
Over 3 through 6 months35,631
Over 6 through 12 months85,368
Over 12 months162,086
Total$336,578

  

December 31, 2020

 

3 months or less

 $94,282 

Over 3 through 6 months

  35,823 

Over 6 through 12 months

  67,352 

Over 12 months

  75,344 

Total

 $272,801 

Certificates of Deposit of $250,000 or More

Certificates of deposit at December 31, 20192020 in amounts of $250,000 or more were classified by maturity as follows (dollars in thousands):

 December 31, 2019
3 months or less$35,219
Over 3 through 6 months18,332
Over 6 through 12 months52,633
Over 12 months94,528
Total$200,712

  

December 31, 2020

 

3 months or less

 $68,319 

Over 3 through 6 months

  21,037 

Over 6 through 12 months

  47,859 

Over 12 months

  32,874 

Total

 $170,089 

Borrowed Funds

In addition to internal deposit generation, the Company also relies on borrowed funds as a supplemental source of funding. Borrowed funds consist of customer repurchase agreements, overnight borrowings from the FHLB and longer-term FHLB advances, subordinated debt acquired in the HomeTown merger, and trust preferred capital notes. Additionally, on August 21, 2019, the Company secured a $3,000,000 line of credit with a regional commercial bank at 0.25% under Prime maturingthat matured August 21, 2020. Customer repurchase agreements are borrowings collateralized by securities of the U.S. Government, its agencies, or Government Sponsored Enterprises ("GSEs") and generally mature daily. The Company considers these accounts to be a stable and low cost source of funds. The securities underlying these agreements remain under the Company's control. Refer to Notes 12, 13 and 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of long-term debt.

The following table presents information pertaining to the Company's short-term borrowed funds as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Short-Term Borrowings

  As of December 31,
  2019 2018
     
Customer repurchase agreements $40,475
 $35,243
     
Weighted interest rate 1.40% 1.67%
     
Average for the year ended:  
  
Outstanding $41,890
 $19,550
Interest rate 1.54% 0.95%
     
Maximum month-end outstanding $42,986
 $39,157

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 
         

Customer repurchase agreements

 $42,551  $40,475 
         

Weighted interest rate

  0.13%  1.40%
         

Average for the year ended:

        

Outstanding

 $42,938  $41,890 

Interest rate

  0.60%  1.54%
         

Maximum month-end outstanding

 $47,402  $42,986 

In the regular course of conducting its business, the Company takes deposits from political subdivisions of the states of Virginia and North Carolina. At December 31, 2019,2020, the Bank's public deposits totaled $256,984,000. $326,774,000. The Company is legally required to provide collateral to secure the deposits that exceed the insurance coverage provided by the FDIC. This collateral can be provided in the form of certain types of government agency bonds or letters of credit from the FHLB. At year-end 2019,2020, the Company had $170,000,000$245,000,000 in letters of credit with the FHLB outstanding to supplement collateral for such deposits.

Shareholders' Equity

The Company's goal with capital management is to comply with all regulatory capital requirements and to support growth, while generating acceptable returns on equity and paying a high rate of dividends.

Shareholders' equity was $337,894,000 at December 31, 2020 and $320,258,000 at December 31, 2019 and $222,542,000 at December 31, 2018.

2019.

The Company declared and paid quarterly dividends totaling $1.08 per share for 2020, $1.04 per share for 2019, and $1.00 per share for 2018, and $0.96 per share for 2017.2018. Cash dividends in 20192020 totaled $10,965,000$11,842,000 and represented a 52.4%39.4% payout of 20192020 net income, compared to a 52.4% payout in 2019, and a 38.5% payout in 2018, and a 55.0% payout in 2017.

2018.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company and the Bank became subject to the Basel III Capital Rules. The Basel III Capital Rules require the Company and the Bank to comply with the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital"capital conservation buffer”buffer" (effectively resulting in a minimum


ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7%), (ii) a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%), (iii) a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%), and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets. The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until it was fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. In addition, to be well capitalized under the “prompt"prompt corrective action”action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA, the Bank must have the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 8.0%; (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10.0%; and (iv) a leverage ratio of at least 5.0%.

On August 28, 2018, the FRB issued an interim final rule required by the EGRRCPA that expands the applicability of the FRB’sFRB's SBHC Policy Statement to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of less than $3 billion (up from the prior $1 billion threshold). Under the SBHC Policy Statement, qualifying bank holding companies, such as the Company, have additional flexibility in the amount of debt they can issue and are also exempt from the Basel III Capital Rules. However, the Company does not currently intend to issue a material amount of debt or take any other action that would cause its capital ratios to fall below the minimum ratios required by the Basel III Capital Rules. The SBHC Policy Statement does not apply to the Bank, and the Bank must comply with the Basel III Capital Rules.

On September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the EGRRCPA that will permit qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to opt into the CBLR framework. Under the final rule, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of greater than 9% would not be subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules and will be deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a community bank that falls out of compliance with the framework will have a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, provided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the grace period. The CBLR framework willwas first be available for banking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports.

On April 6, 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies announced the issuance of two interim final rules that make changes to the CBLR framework and implement Section 4012 of the CARES Act. One interim final rule provides that, as of the second quarter of 2020, a banking organization with a leverage ratio of 8% or greater (and that meets the other existing qualifying criteria) could elect to use the CBLR framework. This rule also establishes a two-quarter grace period for a qualifying community banking organization whose leverage ratio fell below 8% so long as the banking organization maintained a leverage ratio of 7% or greater. The second interim final rule provides a transition back to the leverage ratio requirement of 9%. Under this rule, the required leverage ratio was 8% beginning in the second quarter and for the remainder of calendar year 2020 and will be 8.5% for calendar year 2021 and 9% thereafter. This rule also maintains a two-quarter grace period for a qualifying community banking organization whose leverage ratio falls no more than 1% below the applicable ratio. This transition will allow community banking organizations to focus on supporting lending to creditworthy households and businesses given the recent strains on the U.S. economy caused by COVID-19. The Company and the Bank do not currently expect to opt into the CBLR framework.

The following table represents the major regulatory capital ratios for the Company as of the dates indicated:

 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Risk-Based Capital Ratios:         
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio11.56% 12.55% 11.50% 11.77% 12.88%
Tier 1 capital ratio12.98% 14.46% 13.42% 13.83% 15.23%
Total capital ratio14.04% 15.35% 14.39% 14.81% 16.34%
          
Leverage Capital Ratios:         
Tier 1 leverage ratio10.75% 11.62% 10.95% 11.67% 12.05%

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Risk-Based Capital Ratios:

                    

Common equity tier 1 capital ratio

  12.36%  11.56%  12.55%  11.50%  11.77%

Tier 1 capital ratio

  13.78%  12.98%  14.46%  13.42%  13.83%

Total capital ratio

  15.18%  14.04%  15.35%  14.39%  14.81%
                     

Leverage Capital Ratios:

                    

Tier 1 leverage ratio

  9.48%  10.75%  11.62%  10.95%  11.67%

Management believes the Company is in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements applicable to it, and the Bank meets the requirements to be considered "well capitalized" under the prompt corrective action framework as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.

Stock Repurchase Programs

On JanuaryDecember 19, 20182019, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of Directors of a stock repurchase program. The program authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000400,000 shares of the Company's common stock over a two year period that ended onthrough December 31, 2019.

2020. The program was suspended since in second quarter of 2020 in an effort to conserve capital due to COVID-19.

In 2020, the Company repurchased 140,526 shares at an average cost of $35.44 per share for a total cost of $4,981,000. In 2019, the Company repurchased 85,868 shares at an average cost of $36.64 per share, for a total cost of $3,146,000. The Company did not repurchase any shares in 2018.

On December 19, 2019,January 12, 2021, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of Directors of another stock repurchase program. The program authorizes the repurchase of up to 400,000350,000 shares of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2020.



2021.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following items are contractual obligations of the Company as of December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands):

 Payments Due By Period
 Total Under 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More than 5 years
          
Time deposits$471,770
 $242,784
 $177,098
 $47,576
 $4,312
Repurchase agreements40,475
 40,475
 
 
 
Operating leases6,160
 959
 1,863
 1,316
 2,022
Subordinated debt7,517
 
 
 
 7,517
Junior subordinated debt28,029
 
 
 
 28,029

  

Payments Due By Period

 
  

Total

  

Under 1 Year

  

1-3 Years

  

3-5 Years

  

More than 5 years

 
                     

Time deposits

 $396,426  $271,868  $90,030  $29,494  $5,034 

Repurchase agreements

  42,551   42,551          

Operating leases

  5,575   1,048   1,989   989   1,549 

Subordinated debt

  7,500         7,500    

Junior subordinated debt

  28,130            28,130 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES

The Company enters into certain financial transactions in the ordinary course of performing traditional banking services that result in off-balance sheet transactions. Other than AMNB Statutory Trust I, formed in 2006 to issue trust preferred securities, and MidCarolina Trust I and MidCarolina Trust II, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet subsidiaries. Refer to Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of junior subordinated debt. Off-balance sheet transactions were as follows as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments2019 2018
    
Commitments to extend credit$557,364
 $362,586
Standby letters of credit13,611
 15,555
Mortgage loan rate-lock commitments10,791
 9,710

  

December 31,

 

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

 

2020

  

2019

 
         

Commitments to extend credit

 $503,272  $557,364 

Standby letters of credit

  17,355   13,611 

Mortgage loan rate-lock commitments

  26,883   10,791 

Commitments to extend credit to customers represent legally binding agreements with fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being funded, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future funding requirements. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company guaranteeing the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This information is incorporated herein by reference from Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this Form 10-K.


ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Quarterly Financial Results

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

     

2020

 

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Total

 
                     

Interest income

 $23,866  $23,297  $24,179  $24,498  $95,840 

Interest expense

  3,947   3,037   2,684   2,352   12,020 
                     

Net interest income

  19,919   20,260   21,495   22,146   83,820 

Provision for loan losses

  953   4,759   2,619   585   8,916 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  18,966   15,501   18,876   21,561   74,904 
                     

Noninterest income

  4,495   3,835   4,292   4,221   16,843 

Noninterest expense

  13,334   12,432   14,140   14,659   54,565 
                     

Income before income taxes

  10,127   6,904   9,028   11,123   37,182 

Income taxes

  1,585   1,422   1,801   2,329   7,137 

Net income

 $8,542  $5,482  $7,227  $8,794  $30,045 
                     

Per common share:

                    

Net income - basic

 $0.77  $0.50  $0.66  $0.80  $2.74 

Net income - diluted

  0.77   0.50   0.66   0.80   2.73 

Cash dividends

  0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   1.08 

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

     

2019

 

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Total

 
                     

Interest income

 $18,096  $25,211  $24,958  $24,590  $92,855 

Interest expense

  3,028   4,222   4,336   4,142   15,728 
                     

Net interest income

  15,068   20,989   20,622   20,448   77,127 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  16   (10)  (12)  462   456 

Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  15,052   20,999   20,634   19,986   76,671 
                     

Noninterest income

  3,451   3,682   4,171   3,866   15,170 

Noninterest expense

  10,929   26,316   13,792   15,037   66,074 
                     

Income before income taxes

  7,574   (1,635)  11,013   8,815   25,767 

Income taxes

  1,571   (405)  2,321   1,374   4,861 

Net income

 $6,003  $(1,230) $8,692  $7,441  $20,906 
                     

Per common share:

                    

Net income - basic

 $0.69  $(0.11) $0.78  $0.67  $1.99 

Net income - diluted

  0.69   (0.11)  0.78   0.67   1.98 

Cash dividends

  0.25   0.25   0.27   0.27   1.04 

50

 First Second Third Fourth  
2019Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
          
Interest income$18,096
 $25,211
 $24,958
 $24,590
 $92,855
Interest expense3,028
 4,222
 4,336
 4,142
 15,728
          
Net interest income15,068
 20,989
 20,622
 20,448
 77,127
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses16
 (10) (12) 462
 456
Net interest income after provision
 for loan losses
15,052
 20,999
 20,634
 19,986
 76,671
          
Noninterest income3,451
 3,682
 4,171
 3,866
 15,170
Noninterest expense10,929
 26,316
 13,792
 15,037
 66,074
          
Income before income taxes7,574
 (1,635) 11,013
 8,815
 25,767
Income taxes1,571
 (405) 2,321
 1,374
 4,861
Net income$6,003
 $(1,230) $8,692
 $7,441
 $20,906
          
Per common share: 
  
  
  
  
Net income - basic$0.69
 $(0.11) $0.78
 $0.67
 $1.99
Net income - diluted0.69
 (0.11) 0.78
 0.67
 1.98
Cash dividends0.25
 0.25
 0.27
 0.27
 1.04
          
  First Second Third Fourth  
2018Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
          
Interest income$16,668
 $16,992
 $17,217
 $17,891
 $68,768
Interest expense2,125
 2,204
 2,466
 2,879
 9,674
          
Net interest income14,543
 14,788
 14,751
 15,012
 59,094
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses(44) (30) (23) (6) (103)
Net interest income after provision
 for loan losses
14,587
 14,818
 14,774
 15,018
 59,197
          
Noninterest income3,333
 3,563
 3,380
 2,998
 13,274
Noninterest expense10,702
 11,002
 10,904
 11,638
 44,246
          
Income before income taxes7,218
 7,379
 7,250
 6,378
 28,225
Income taxes1,406
 1,399
 1,465
 1,376
 5,646
Net income$5,812
 $5,980
 $5,785
 $5,002
 $22,579
          
Per common share: 
  
  
  
  
Net income - basic$0.67
 $0.69
 $0.66
 $0.57
 $2.60
Net income - diluted0.67
 0.69
 0.66
 0.57
 2.59
Cash dividends0.25
 0.25
 0.25
 0.25
 1.00

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

     

2018

 

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Total

 
                     

Interest income

 $16,668  $16,992  $17,217  $17,891  $68,768 

Interest expense

  2,125   2,204   2,466   2,879   9,674 
                     

Net interest income

  14,543   14,788   14,751   15,012   59,094 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  (44)  (30)  (23)  (6)  (103)

Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  14,587   14,818   14,774   15,018   59,197 
                     

Noninterest income

  3,333   3,563   3,380   2,998   13,274 

Noninterest expense

  10,702   11,002   10,904   11,638   44,246 
                     

Income before income taxes

  7,218   7,379   7,250   6,378   28,225 

Income taxes

  1,406   1,399   1,465   1,376   5,646 

Net income

 $5,812  $5,980  $5,785  $5,002  $22,579 
                     

Per common share:

                    

Net income - basic

 $0.67  $0.69  $0.66  $0.57  $2.60 

Net income - diluted

  0.67   0.69   0.66   0.57   2.59 

Cash dividends

  0.25   0.25   0.25   0.25   1.00 


yhblogoa09.jpg


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

American National Bankshares Inc.

Danville, Virginia


Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American National Bankshares Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 9, 20208, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Loan Losses Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment Qualitative Factors

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 6 (Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  The Company's allowance for loan losses has two basic components, the formula allowance and the specific allowance. At December 31, 2020, the formula allowance represented $20,534,000 of the total allowance for loan losses of $21,403,000. For loans that are not specifically identified for impairment, the formula allowance uses historical loss experience along with various qualitative factors to develop adjusted loss factors for each loan segment.  The qualitative adjustments to the historical loss experience are established by applying a loss percentage to the loan segments identified by management based on their assessment of shared risk characteristics within groups of similar loans. Qualitative factors are determined based on management's continuing evaluation of inputs and assumptions underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. Management evaluates qualitative factors, primarily considering national, regional and local economic trends and conditions; concentrations of credit; trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, and loss rates; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in risk selection, underwriting standards, and lending policies; experience of lending officers, other lending staff and loan review; and legal, regulatory and collateral factors.

Management exercised significant judgment when assessing the qualitative factors in estimating the allowance for loan losses. We identified the assessment of the qualitative factors as a critical audit matter as auditing the qualitative factors involved especially complex and subjective auditor judgment in evaluating management's assessment of the inherently subjective estimates.

52

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing the effectiveness of controls over the evaluation of qualitative factors, including management's development and review of the data inputs used as the basis for the allocation factors and management's review and approval of the reasonableness of the assumptions used to develop the qualitative adjustments.

Substantively testing management's process, including evaluating their judgments and assumptions for developing the qualitative factors, which included:

Evaluating the completeness and accuracy of data inputs used as a basis for the qualitative factors.

Evaluating the reasonableness of management's judgments related to the determination of qualitative factors.
Evaluating the qualitative factors for directional consistency and for reasonableness.
Testing the mathematical accuracy of the allowance calculation, including the application of the qualitative factors.

/s/ Yount, HydeYOUNT, HYDE & Barbour,BARBOUR, P.C.


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.


Winchester, Virginia

March 9, 20208, 2021

53


yhblogoa10.jpg


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

American National Bankshares Inc.

Danville, Virginia


Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited American National Bankshares Inc. and Subsidiary’sSubsidiary's (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 9, 20208, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion.


Basis for Opinion

The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become


inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Yount, HydeYOUNT, HYDE & Barbour,BARBOUR, P.C.


Winchester, Virginia

March 9, 20208, 2021


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018

2019

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  

2020

  

2019

 

ASSETS

        

Cash and due from banks

 $30,767  $32,505 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

  343,603   47,077 

Securities available for sale, at fair value

  466,091   379,195 

Restricted stock, at cost

  8,715   8,630 

Loans held for sale

  15,591   2,027 

Loans, net of deferred fees and costs

  2,015,056   1,830,815 

Less allowance for loan losses

  (21,403)  (13,152)

Net loans

  1,993,653   1,817,663 

Premises and equipment, net

  39,723   39,848 

Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance

  958   1,308 

Goodwill

  85,048   84,002 

Core deposit intangibles, net

  6,091   7,728 

Bank owned life insurance

  28,482   27,817 

Other assets

  31,288   30,750 

Total assets

 $3,050,010  $2,478,550 
         

LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

        

Liabilities:

        

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 $830,094  $578,606 

Interest-bearing deposits

  1,781,236   1,481,941 

Total deposits

  2,611,330   2,060,547 

Customer repurchase agreements

  42,551   40,475 
Subordinated debt  7,500   7,517 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,130   28,029 

Other liabilities

  22,605   21,724 

Total liabilities

  2,712,116   2,158,292 
         

Commitments and contingencies

 
         
         

Shareholders' equity:

        

Preferred stock, $5 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding

  0   0 

Common stock, $1 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 10,982,367 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 11,071,540 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019

  10,926   11,019 

Capital in excess of par value

  154,850   158,244 

Retained earnings

  169,681   151,478 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net

  2,437   (483)

Total shareholders' equity

  337,894   320,258 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $3,050,010  $2,478,550 
ASSETS2019 2018
Cash and due from banks$32,505
 $29,587
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks47,077
 34,668
    
Equity securities, at fair value
 1,830
Securities available for sale, at fair value379,195
 332,653
Restricted stock, at cost8,630
 5,247
Loans held for sale2,027
 640
    
Loans, net of unearned income1,830,815
 1,357,476
Less allowance for loan losses(13,152) (12,805)
Net loans1,817,663
 1,344,671
    
Premises and equipment, net39,848
 26,675
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance of $153 in 2019 and $109 in 20181,308
 869
Goodwill84,002
 43,872
Core deposit intangibles, net7,728
 926
Bank owned life insurance27,817
 18,941
Accrued interest receivable and other assets30,750
 22,287
Total assets$2,478,550
 $1,862,866
    
LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 
  
Liabilities: 
  
Demand deposits -- noninterest bearing$578,606
 $435,828
Demand deposits -- interest bearing328,015
 234,621
Money market deposits504,651
 401,461
Savings deposits177,505
 132,360
Time deposits471,770
 361,957
Total deposits2,060,547
 1,566,227
    
Customer repurchase agreements40,475
 35,243
Subordinated debt7,517
 
Junior subordinated debt28,029
 27,927
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities21,724
 10,927
Total liabilities2,158,292
 1,640,324
    
Commitments and contingencies

 

    
Shareholders' equity: 
  
Preferred stock, $5 par, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
 
Common stock, $1 par, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 11,071,540 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 8,720,337 shares outstanding at December 31, 201811,019
 8,668
Capital in excess of par value158,244
 78,172
Retained earnings151,478
 141,537
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(483) (5,835)
Total shareholders' equity320,258
 222,542
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$2,478,550
 $1,862,866

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017

2018

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Interest and Dividend Income:

            

Interest and fees on loans

 $87,700  $82,684  $59,966 

Interest and dividends on securities:

            

Taxable

  6,764   7,682   6,106 

Tax-exempt

  433   777   1,502 

Dividends

  503   451   321 

Other interest income

  440   1,261   873 

Total interest and dividend income

  95,840   92,855   68,768 

Interest Expense:

            

Interest on deposits

  9,729   13,143   8,086 

Interest on short-term borrowings

  259   650   186 
Interest on subordinated debt  489   367   0 
Interest on junior subordinated debt  1,543   1,554   1,402 

Interest on long-term borrowings

  0   14   0 

Total interest expense

  12,020   15,728   9,674 

Net Interest Income

  83,820   77,127   59,094 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  8,916   456   (103)

Net Interest Income after Provision for (Recovery of) Loan Losses

  74,904   76,671   59,197 

Noninterest Income:

            

Trust fees

  4,044   3,847   3,783 

Service charges on deposit accounts

  2,557   2,866   2,455 

Other fees and commissions

  3,925   3,693   2,637 

Mortgage banking income

  3,514   2,439   1,862 

Securities gains, net

  814   607   123 

Brokerage fees

  745   721   795 

Income from Small Business Investment Companies

  270   211   637 

Gains (losses) on premises and equipment, net

  (110)  (427)  60 

Other

  1,084   1,213   922 

Total noninterest income

  16,843   15,170   13,274 

Noninterest Expense:

            

Salaries and employee benefits

  29,765   30,015   24,879 

Occupancy and equipment

  5,586   5,417   4,378 

FDIC assessment

  639   119   537 

Bank franchise tax

  1,702   1,644   1,054 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,637   1,398   265 

Data processing

  3,017   2,567   1,691 

Software

  1,454   1,295   1,279 

Other real estate owned, net

  60   31   122 

Merger related expenses

  0   11,782   872 

Other

  10,705   11,806   9,169 

Total noninterest expense

  54,565   66,074   44,246 

Income Before Income Taxes

  37,182   25,767   28,225 

Income Taxes

  7,137   4,861   5,646 

Net Income

 $30,045  $20,906  $22,579 

Net Income Per Common Share:

            

Basic

 $2.74  $1.99  $2.60 

Diluted

 $2.73  $1.98  $2.59 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:

            

Basic

  10,981,623   10,531,572   8,698,014 

Diluted

  10,985,790   10,541,337   8,708,462 
 2019 2018 2017
Interest and Dividend Income:     
Interest and fees on loans$82,684
 $59,966
 $55,276
Interest and dividends on securities: 
  
  
Taxable7,682
 6,106
 4,666
Tax-exempt777
 1,502
 2,043
Dividends451
 321
 319
Other interest income1,261
 873
 734
Total interest and dividend income92,855
 68,768
 63,038
Interest Expense: 
  
  
Interest on deposits13,143
 8,086
 5,794
Interest on short-term borrowings650
 186
 173
Interest on long-term borrowings14
 
 296
Interest on subordinated debt367
 
 
Interest on junior subordinated debt1,554
 1,402
 1,028
Total interest expense15,728
 9,674
 7,291
Net Interest Income77,127
 59,094
 55,747
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses456
 (103) 1,016
Net Interest Income after Provision for (Recovery of) Loan Losses76,671
 59,197
 54,731
Noninterest Income: 
  
  
Trust fees3,847
 3,783
 3,926
Service charges on deposit accounts2,866
 2,455
 2,426
Other fees and commissions3,693
 2,637
 2,471
Mortgage banking income2,439
 1,862
 2,208
Securities gains, net607
 123
 812
Brokerage fees721
 795
 829
Income from Small Business Investment Companies211
 637
 236
Gains (losses) on premises and equipment, net(427) 60
 344
Other1,213
 922
 975
Total noninterest income15,170
 13,274
 14,227
Noninterest Expense: 
  
  
Salaries24,672
 20,509
 19,829
Employee benefits5,343
 4,370
 4,274
Occupancy and equipment5,417
 4,378
 4,487
FDIC assessment119
 537
 538
Bank franchise tax1,644
 1,054
 1,072
Core deposit intangible amortization1,398
 265
 528
Data processing2,567
 1,691
 2,014
Software1,295
 1,279
 1,144
Other real estate owned, net31
 122
 303
Merger related expenses11,782
 872
 
Other11,806
 9,169
 8,694
Total noninterest expense66,074
 44,246
 42,883
Income Before Income Taxes25,767
 28,225
 26,075
Income Taxes4,861
 5,646
 10,826
Net Income$20,906
 $22,579
 $15,249
Net Income Per Common Share: 
  
  
Basic$1.99
 $2.60
 $1.76
Diluted$1.98
 $2.59
 $1.76
Average Common Shares Outstanding: 
  
  
Basic10,531,572
 8,698,014
 8,641,717
Diluted10,541,337
 8,708,462
 8,660,628

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017

2018

(Dollars in thousands)

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Net income

 $30,045  $20,906  $22,579 
             

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            
             

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale

  7,213   9,095   (3,209)

Tax effect

  (1,557)  (2,005)  745 
             

Reclassification adjustment for gains on sale or call of securities

  (814)  (274)  (81)

Tax effect

  176   59   18 
             

Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

  (2,210)  (1,854)  (804)

Tax effect

  448   394   180 
             

Change in unfunded pension liability

  (413)  (64)  1,291 

Tax effect

  77   1   (249)
             

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  2,920   5,352   (2,109)
             

Comprehensive income

 $32,965  $26,258  $20,470 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Net income$20,906
 $22,579
 $15,249
      
Other comprehensive income (loss): 
  
  
      
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale9,095
 (3,209) 35
Tax effect(2,005) 745
 (12)
      
Reclassification adjustment for gain on sale or call of securities(274) (81) (812)
Tax effect59
 18
 284
      
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges(1,854) (804) 
Tax effect394
 180
 
      
Change in unfunded pension liability(64) 1,291
 (234)
Tax effect1
 (249) 82
      
Other comprehensive income (loss)5,352
 (2,109) (657)
      
Comprehensive income$26,258
 $20,470
 $14,592

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017

2018

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

              

Accumulated

     
      

Capital in

      

Other

  

Total

 
  

Common

  

Excess of

  

Retained

  

Comprehensive

  

Shareholders'

 
  

Stock

  

Par Value

  

Earnings

  

Income (Loss)

  

Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 $8,604  $76,179  $127,010  $(3,076) $208,717 
                     

Net income

  0   0   22,579   0   22,579 

Other comprehensive loss

  0   0   0   (2,109)  (2,109)

Reclassification for ASU 2016-01 adoption

  0   0   650   (650)  0 

Stock options exercised (35,310 shares)

  35   826   0   0   861 

Vesting of restricted stock (12,712 shares)

  13   (13)  0   0   0 

Equity based compensation (34,480 shares)

  16   1,180   0   0   1,196 

Cash dividends paid, $1.00 per share

  0   0   (8,702)  0   (8,702)
                     

Balance, December 31, 2018

  8,668   78,172   141,537   (5,835)  222,542 
                     

Net income

  0   0   20,906   0   20,906 

Other comprehensive income

  0   0   0   5,352   5,352 

Issuance of common stock for acquisition (2,361,686 shares)

  2,362   80,108   0   0   82,470 

Issuance of replacement options/restricted stock

  0   870   0   0   870 

Stock repurchased (85,868 shares)

  (86)  (3,060)  0   0   (3,146)

Stock options exercised (37,104 shares)

  37   651   0   0   688 

Vesting of restricted stock (21,747 shares)

  22   (22)  0   0   0 

Equity based compensation (38,281 shares)

  16   1,525   0   0   1,541 

Cash dividends paid, $1.04 per share

  0   0   (10,965)  0   (10,965)
                     

Balance, December 31, 2019

  11,019   158,244   151,478   (483)  320,258 
                     

Net income

  0   0   30,045   0   30,045 

Other comprehensive income

  0   0   0   2,920   2,920 

Stock repurchased (140,526 shares)

  (141)  (4,840)  0   0   (4,981)

Stock options exercised (2,573 shares)

  3   40   0   0   43 

Vesting of restricted stock (18,487 shares)

  18   (18)  0   0   0 

Equity based compensation (48,780 shares)

  27   1,424   0   0   1,451 

Cash dividends paid, $1.08 per share

  0   0   (11,842)  0   (11,842)

Balance, December 31, 2020

 $10,926  $154,850  $169,681  $2,437  $337,894 
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
Shareholders'
Equity
Balance, December 31, 2016$8,578
 $75,076
 $119,600
 $(1,874) $201,380
          
Net income
 
 15,249
 
 15,249
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (657) (657)
Reclass "stranded" tax effects from tax rate change
 
 545
 (545) 
Stock options exercised (4,950 shares)5
 108
 
 
 113
Vesting of restricted stock (8,116 shares)8
 (8) 
 
 
Equity based compensation (27,546 shares)13
 1,003
 
 
 1,016
Cash dividends paid, $0.97 per share
 
 (8,384) 
 (8,384)
          
Balance, December 31, 20178,604
 76,179
 127,010
 (3,076) 208,717
          
Net income
 
 22,579
 
 22,579
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (2,109) (2,109)
Reclassification for ASU 2016-01 adoption
 
 650
 (650) 
Stock options exercised (35,310 shares)35
 826
 
 
 861
Vesting of restricted stock (12,712 shares)13
 (13) 
 
 
Equity based compensation (34,480 shares)16
 1,180
 
 
 1,196
Cash dividends paid, $1.00 per share
 
 (8,702) 
 (8,702)
          
Balance, December 31, 20188,668
 78,172
 141,537
 (5,835) 222,542
          
Net income
 
 20,906
 
 20,906
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 5,352
 5,352
Issuance of common stock (2,361,686 shares)2,362
 80,108
 
 
 82,470
Issuance of replacement options/restricted stock
 870
 
 
 870
Stock repurchased (85,868 shares)(86) (3,060) 
 
 (3,146)
Stock options exercised (37,104 shares)37
 651
 
 
 688
Vesting of restricted stock (21,747 shares)22
 (22) 
 
 
Equity based compensation (38,281 shares)16
 1,525
 
 
 1,541
Cash dividends paid, $1.04 per share
 
 (10,965) 
 (10,965)
Balance, December 31, 2019$11,019
 $158,244
 $151,478
 $(483) $320,258

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017

2018

(Dollars in thousands)

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

            

Net income

 $30,045  $20,906  $22,579 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  8,916   456   (103)

Depreciation

  2,188   2,064   1,775 

Net accretion of acquisition accounting adjustments

  (3,812)  (3,387)  (1,288)

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,637   1,398   265 

Net amortization of securities

  1,186   1,100   1,617 

Net gain on sale or call of securities available for sale

  (814)  (274)  (81)

Net change in fair value of equity securities

  0   (333)  (42)

Gain on sale of loans held for sale

  (3,514)  (2,439)  (1,862)

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

  155,705   103,760   80,600 

Originations of loans held for sale

  (165,755)  (102,708)  (77,739)

Net (gain) loss on other real estate owned

  (4)  (120)  14 

Valuation allowance on other real estate owned

  0   68   30 

Net (gain) loss on sale or disposal of premises and equipment

  110   427   (60)

Equity based compensation expense

  1,451   1,541   1,196 

Earnings on bank owned life insurance

  (665)  (630)  (481)

Deferred income tax expense

  (640)  1,068   556 

Net change in other assets

  29   11,137   (318)

Net change in other liabilities

  (2,387)  (1,354)  844 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  23,676   32,680   27,502 
             

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

            

Proceeds from sales of equity securities

  0   445   431 

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale

  5,811   29,878   57,607 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale

  208,429   123,915   30,607 

Purchases of securities available for sale

  (295,109)  (155,746)  (106,575)

Net change in restricted stock

  (85)  (795)  863 

Proceeds from sales of purchased credit impaired loans

  4,939   0   0 

Net increase in loans

  (186,635)  (26,257)  (21,256)

Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment

  1   0   234 

Purchases of premises and equipment

  (2,694)  (3,555)  (2,723)

Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned

  195   1,289   911 

Cash paid in bank acquisition

  0   (27)  0 

Cash acquired in bank acquisition

  0   26,283   0 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (265,148)  (4,570)  (39,901)
             

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

            

Net change in noninterest-bearing deposits

  251,488   23,310   41,484 

Net change in interest-bearing deposits

  299,476   (12,241)  (9,983)

Net change in customer repurchase agreements

  2,076   5,232   24,517 

Net change in other short-term borrowings

  0   (14,883)  (24,000)

Net change in long-term borrowings

  0   (778)  0 

Common stock dividends paid

  (11,842)  (10,965)  (8,702)

Repurchase of common stock

  (4,981)  (3,146)  0 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  43   688   861 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  536,260   (12,783)  24,177 
             

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

  294,788   15,327   11,778 
             

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

  79,582   64,255   52,477 
             

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 $374,370  $79,582  $64,255 
 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net income$20,906
 $22,579
 $15,249
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
  Provision for (recovery of) loan losses456
 (103) 1,016
  Depreciation2,064
 1,775
 1,877
  Net accretion of acquisition accounting adjustments(3,387) (1,288) (2,114)
  Core deposit intangible amortization1,398
 265
 528
  Net amortization of securities1,100
 1,617
 1,831
  Net gain on sale or call of securities available for sale(274) (81) (812)
  Net change in fair value of equity securities(333) (42) 
  Gain on sale of loans held for sale(2,439) (1,862) (1,765)
  Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale103,760
 80,600
 92,733
  Originations of loans held for sale(102,708) (77,739) (86,611)
  Net (gain) loss on other real estate owned(120) 14
 22
  Valuation allowance on other real estate owned68
 30
 143
  Net (gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment427
 (60) (344)
  Equity based compensation expense1,541
 1,196
 1,016
  Net change in bank owned life insurance(630) (481) (297)
  Deferred income tax expense1,068
 556
 3,471
Net change in interest receivable980
 (218) (148)
Net change in other assets10,157
 (100) (379)
Net change in interest payable(574) 121
 51
Net change in other liabilities(780) 723
 284
Net cash provided by operating activities32,680
 27,502
 25,751
      
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
  
  
Proceeds from sales of equity securities445
 431
 
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale29,878
 57,607
 55,903
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale123,915
 30,607
 52,397
Purchases of securities available for sale(155,746) (106,575) (84,931)
Net change in restricted stock(795) 863
 114
Net increase in loans(26,257) (21,256) (170,515)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
 234
 653
Purchases of premises and equipment(3,555) (2,723) (2,648)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned1,289
 911
 1,171
Cash paid in bank acquisition(27) 
 
Cash acquired in bank acquisition26,283
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities(4,570) (39,901) (147,856)
      
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
  
Net change in demand, money market, and savings deposits41,968
 53,202
 159,283
Net change in time deposits(30,899) (21,701) 4,803
Net change in customer repurchase agreements5,232
 24,517
 (28,440)
Net change in other short-term borrowings(14,883) (24,000) 4,000
Net change in long-term borrowings(778) 
 (10,000)
Common stock dividends paid(10,965) (8,702) (8,384)
Repurchase of common stock(3,146) 
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options688
 861
 113
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(12,783) 24,177
 121,375
      
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents15,327
 11,778
 (730)
      
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period64,255
 52,477
 53,207
      
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$79,582
 $64,255
 $52,477

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018

Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations and Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American National Bankshares Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary, American National Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). The Bank offers a wide variety of retail, commercial, secondary market mortgage lending, and trust and investment services which also include non-deposit products such as mutual funds and insurance policies.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, goodwill and intangible assets, other-than-temporary impairment of securities, accounting for merger and acquisition activity, accounting for acquired loans with specific credit-related deterioration, and the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

COVID-19 spread rapidly across the world in the first quarter of 2020 and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. On March 13, 2020, the United States President declared a national emergency in the face of a growing public health and economic crisis due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. The government and private sector responses to contain its spread began to significantly affect the Company's operations beginning in March and will likely continue to adversely affect its operations through 2021, although such effects may vary significantly. The duration and extent of the effects over longer terms cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The risks and uncertainties resulting from the pandemic will most likely affect future earnings, cash flows and overall financial condition of the Company. These uncertainties include the nature and duration of the financial effects felt by its customers impacting their ability to perform in accordance with their underlying loan agreements, the Company's ability to generate demand for non-loan related products and services, as well as potential declines in real estate values resulting from the market disruption which may impair the recorded values of collateral-dependent loans and other real estate owned. Further, these factors, in addition to those pervasive to the industry and overall U.S. economy, may necessitate an overall valuation of the Company's franchise in such a way an impairment charge to the carrying value of goodwill would be required. Accordingly, significant estimates used in the preparation of the Company's financial statements including those associated with the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses as well as other valuation-based estimates may be subject to significant adjustments in future periods. The greater the duration and severity of the pandemic, the more likely that estimates will be materially impacted by its effects.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") included an initial first round allocation of $659.0 billion for loans to be issued by financial institutions through the Small Business Administration ("SBA"). This program is known as the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). PPP loans are forgivable, in whole or in part, if the proceeds are used for payroll and other permitted purposes in accordance with the requirements of the PPP. The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, which was passed by Congress on December 21, 2020 and then signed into law on December 27, 2020 as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("Appropriations Act"), allocated an additional $284.4 billion. These loans carry a fixed rate of 1.00% and a term of two years for the majority of the initial loans and for five years on the second round, if not forgiven, in whole or in part. Payments were deferred for the firstsix months of the loan. The loans are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. The SBA paid the Bank a processing fee based on the size of the loan. The SBA has approved over 2,700 applications as of  February 28, 2021 totaling $340.9 million in loans. The Company had outstanding net PPP loans of $211.3 million at December 31, 2020 and $226.4 million at February 28, 2021. The Bank has received processing fees of $11.2 million on the PPP loans and incurred direct origination costs of $1.8 million. The Company had net unaccreted PPP loan origination fees of $4.4 million at December 31, 2020 and $5.0 at February 28, 2021. From a funding perspective, the Bank utilized core funding sources for these loans. At December 31, 2020 and February 28, 2021, respectively, the SBA had forgiven $56.4 million and $105.8 million of PPP loans.

In April 2006, AMNB Statutory Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust (the "AMNB Trust") and an unconsolidated wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing preferred securities (the "Trust Preferred Securities") in a private placement pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration. Proceeds from the securities were used to fund the acquisition of Community First Financial Corporation ("Community First") which occurred in April 2006.

In July 2011, and in connection with its acquisition of MidCarolina Financial Corporation ("MidCarolina"), the Company assumed liabilities of MidCarolina Trust I and MidCarolina Trust II, two separate unconsolidated Delaware statutory trusts (the "MidCarolina Trusts"), which were also formed for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. Refer to Note 14 for further details concerning these entities.

All significant inter-company transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation, with the exception of the AMNB Trust and the MidCarolina Trusts, as detailed in Note 14.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash includes cash on hand, cash with correspondent banks, and cash on deposit at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with original maturities of three months or less and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost.

60

Interest-bearing Deposits in Other Banks

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks mature within one year and are carried at cost.

Securities

Certain debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as "held to maturity" and recorded at amortized cost. Trading securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. Debt securities not classified as held to maturity or trading are classified as "available for sale" and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

The Company does not currently have any securities in held to maturity or trading and has no plans to add any to either category. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For


debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: (1)(1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and, (2)(2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are not held for trading are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses included in noninterest income.

Due to the nature and restrictions placed on the Company's investment in common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, these securities have been classified as restricted equity securities and carried at cost.

Loans Held for Sale

Secondary market mortgage loans are designated as held for sale at the time of their origination. These loans are pre-sold with servicing released and the Company does not retain any interest after the loans are sold. These loans consist primarily of fixed-rate, single-family residential mortgage loans which meet the underwriting characteristics of certain government-sponsored enterprises (conforming loans). In addition, the Company requires a firm purchase commitment from a permanent investor before a loan can be committed, thus limiting interest rate risk. Loans held for sale are carried at fair value. Gains on sales of loans are recognized at the loan closing date and are included in noninterest income.

Derivative Loan Commitments

The Company enters into mortgage loan commitments whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. Loan commitments that are derivatives are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets with net changes in their fair values recorded in other expenses. 

The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and sale of the loan generally ranges from 30 to 60 days. The Company protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery contracts, by committing to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed the interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, the Company is not generally exposed to significant losses nor will it realize significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The correlation between the rate lock commitments and the best efforts contracts is very high due to their similarity.

The fair value of rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts is not readily ascertainable with precision because rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not actively traded in stand-alone markets. The Company determines the fair value of rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts by measuring the change in the estimated value of the underlying assets while taking into consideration the probability that the loan will be funded.

Loans

The Company makes mortgage, commercial, and consumer loans. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is secured by real estate. The ability of the Company's debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate market and general economic conditions in the Company's market area.

61

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balance adjusted for the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method. The accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Loans are typically charged off when the loan is 120 days past due, unless secured and in process of collection. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis or cost recovery method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

A loan is considered past due when a payment of principal or interest or both is due but not paid. Management closely monitors past due loans in timeframes of 30-5930-59 days, 60-8960-89 days, and 90 or more days past due.


These policies apply to all loan portfolio classes and segments.

Substandard and doubtful risk graded commercial, commercial real estate, and construction loans are reviewed for impairment. All troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs"), regardless of dollar amount, are also evaluated for impairment. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment and establishing a specific allowance include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, commercial real estate, and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Generally, large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans (residential real estate and consumer loans) are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Company's policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans is consistent with its nonaccrual policy.

The Company's loan portfolio is organized by major segment. These include: commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate and consumer loans. Each segment has particular risk characteristics that are specific to the borrower and the generic category of credit. Commercial loan repayments are highly dependent on cash flows associated with the underlying business and its profitability. They can also be impacted by changes in collateral values. Commercial real estate loans share the same general risk characteristics as commercial loans but are often more dependent on the value of the underlying real estate collateral and, when construction is involved, the ultimate completion of and sale of the project. Residential real estate loans are generally dependent on the value of collateral and the credit worthiness of the underlying borrower. Consumer loans are very similar in risk characteristics to residential real estate.

In connection with mergers, certain loans were acquired which exhibited deteriorated credit quality since origination and for which the Company does not expect to collect all contractual payments. These purchased credit impaired loans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 310-30, 310-30,Receivables - Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, and are recorded at the amount paid, such that there is no carryover of the seller's allowance for loan losses. After acquisition, losses are recognized by an increase in the allowance for loan losses.

Such purchased credit impaired loans are accounted for individually or aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics such as, credit score, loan type, and date of origination. The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each loan or pool, and the expected cash flows in excess of amount paid is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool (accretable yield). The excess of the loan's or pool's contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (nonaccretable difference).

Over the life of the loan or pool, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded as a provision for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial condition, management may grant a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a TDR. Management strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify their loan to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. In cases where borrowers are granted new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or principal, management measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans. The Company has $1,058,000had $1,976,000 in loans classified as TDRs as of December 31,2020 and $1,058,000 as of December 31,2019.

62

In March 2020 (revised in April 2020), the federal banking agencies issued an "Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus." This was in response to the COVID-19 pandemic affecting societies and economies around the world. This guidance encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. The guidance explains that, in consultation with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") staff, the federal banking agencies have concluded that short-term modifications (e.g. six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current as of the implementation date of a relief program are not TDRs. The CARES Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on March 27, 2020. Section 4013 of the CARES Act also addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that COVID-19 related modifications on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 and $1,090,000 aswere not TDRs. The Bank implemented a Disaster Assistance Program ("DAP") to provide relief to its borrowers under this guidance. The Bank provided assistance to customers with loan balances of $405.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.

2020. The balance of loans remaining in this program at December 31, 2020 was $30.0 million, or 1.5% of the total portfolio, with $18.2 million of the $30.0 million in total deferrals the result of second and third request interest deferrals. At February 28, 2021, the balance of loans remaining in this program was $25.2 million, or 1.2% of the total portfolio, with $16.7 million of the $25.2 million in total deferrals the result of second request interest deferrals. The majority of remaining modifications involved three-month deferments of interest. This interagency guidance has not had a material impact on the Company's financials and is not expected to have a material impact on ongoing operations; however, this impact cannot be quantified at this time.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of the allowance for loan losses ("ALLL") is to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and by recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Loan charge-offs decrease the allowance.


The goal of the Company is to maintain an appropriate, systematic, and consistently applied process to determine the amounts of the ALLL and the provision for loan loss expense.

The Company uses certain practices to manage its credit risk. These practices include (1)(1) appropriate lending limits for loan officers, (2)(2) a loan approval process, (3)(3) careful underwriting of loan requests, including analysis of borrowers, cash flows, collateral, and market risks, (4)(4) regular monitoring of the portfolio, including diversification by type and geography, (5)(5) review of loans by the Loan Review department, which operates independently of loan production (the Loan Review function consists of a co-sourced arrangement using both internal personnel and external vendors to provide the Company with a more robust review function of the loan portfolio), (6)(6) regular meetings of the Credit Committees to discuss portfolio and policy changes and make decisions on large or unusual loan requests, and (7)(7) regular meetings of the Asset Quality Committee which reviews the status of individual loans.

Risk grades are assigned as part of the loan origination process. From time to time risk grades may be modified as warranted by the facts and circumstances surrounding the credit.

Calculation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses is prepared quarterly by the Finance Department. The Company's Credit Committee, Risk and Compliance Committee, Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors review the allowance for adequacy.

The Company's allowance for loan losses has two basic components: the formula allowance and the specific allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates and judgments.

The formula allowance uses historical loss experience as an indicator of future losses, along with various qualitative factors, including levels and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charge-offs and recoveries, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in underwriting standards, experience of lending staff, economic conditions, and portfolio concentrations. In the formula allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans, the historical loss rate is combined with the qualitative factors, resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each risk-grade category of loans. The period-end balances for each loan risk-grade category are multiplied by the adjusted loss factor. Allowance calculations for consumer loans are calculated based on historical losses for each product category without regard to risk grade. This loss rate is combined with qualitative factors resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each product category.

The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss for specifically identified impaired loans. These include:

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate.  The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);
The loan's observable market price, or
The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);

The loan's observable market price, or

The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The use of these computed values is inherently subjective and actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. No single statistic, formula, or measurement determines the adequacy of the allowance. Management makes subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. For analytical purposes, management allocates a portion of the allowance to specific loan categories and specific loans. However, the entire allowance is used to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including identified and unidentified losses.

The relationships and ratios used in calculating the allowance, including the qualitative factors, may change from period to period as facts and circumstances evolve. Furthermore, management cannot provide assurance that in any particular period the Company will not have sizeable credit losses in relation to the amount reserved. Management may find it necessary to significantly adjust the allowance, considering current factors at the time.

63

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Premises and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three years to thirty-nine years; leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is less. Software is generally amortized over three years. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on the straight-line method.


Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of replacing structural parts of major units are considered individually and are expensed or capitalized as the facts dictate. Gains and losses on routine dispositions are reflected in current operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test.impairment. Additionally, acquired intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles) are separately recognized if the benefit of the assets can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, and amortized over their useful lives. Intangible assets related to branch transactions continued to amortize. The cost of purchased deposit relationships, and other intangible assets, based on independent valuation, are being amortized over their estimated lives ranging from eight to of ten years.

The Company records as goodwill the excessfair value of purchase pricethe consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Impairment testing is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-04, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in the previous two-step impairment test. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the prior requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2, which requires an entity to calculate any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. The Company performs its annual analysis as of June 30 each fiscal year. Accounting guidance permits preliminaryDue to the COVID-19 pandemic market conditions, the Company determined a triggering event occurred during the first quarter of 2020 and performed a qualitative assessment at March 31, 2020 and as the pandemic continued performed qualitative assessments at June 30 and September 30 and a quantitative assessment at December 31, 2020 and determined no impairment was indicated. The impact of qualitative factors to determine whether more substantialCOVID-19 on market conditions and other changes in the economic environment, operations, or other adverse events could result in future impairment testing is required. The Company chose to bypasscharges which could have a material adverse impact on the preliminary assessment and utilized a two-step process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first step tests for impairment, while the second step, if necessary, measures the impairment.  NoCompany's operating results. NaN indicators of impairment were identified during the years ended December 31,2019 2018, or 2017.

2018.

Trust Assets

Securities and other property held by the trust and investment services segment in a fiduciary or agency capacity are not assets of the Company and are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Other Real Estate Owned

("OREO")

OREO represents real estate that has been acquired through loan foreclosures or deeds received in lieu of loan payments. Generally, such properties are appraised at the time acquired and are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management, and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in noninterest expense.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

In connection with mergers, the Company has acquired bank owned life insurance ("BOLI"). The asset is reflected as the cash surrender value of the policies as provided by the insurer on a monthly basis.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1)(1) the assets have been isolated from the Company – put presumptively beyond reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2)(2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3)(3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the balance sheet method to account for deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.

64

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-notmore-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet along with any associated interest and


penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company had no liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018.
2019.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock compensation accounting guidance ASC 718,Compensation - Stock Compensation, requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The stock compensation accounting guidance covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

The stock compensation accounting guidance requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and recognized over the employees' service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. A Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share represent income available to common shareholders divided by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the impact of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company consist solely of outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury method. Nonvested shares of restricted stock are included in the computation of basic earnings per share because the holder has voting rights and shares in non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is shown in a two statement approach; the first statement presents total net income and its components followed by a second statement that presents all the components of other comprehensive income which include unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges, and changes in the funded status of the defined benefit postretirement plan.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI")The Company early adopted this new standard as of December 31, 2017. ASU 2018-02 requires reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for "stranded" tax effects resulting from the impact of the newly enacted federal corporate income tax rate on items included in AOCI.  The amount of this reclassification in 2017 was $545,000 and is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' equity.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, and were $453,000, $473,000, and $365,000 in 2020,2019,and $352,000 in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Mergers and Acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under ASC 805,Business Combinations, using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date measured at their fair values as of that date. To determine the fair values, the Company relies on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the Company identifies the acquirer and the closing date and applies applicable recognition principles and conditions. Acquisition-related costs are costs the Company incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs include advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees. Some other examples of costs to the Company include systems conversions, integration planning consultants and advertising costs. The Company accounts for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities is recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP. These acquisition-related costs have been and will be included within the consolidated statements of income classified within the noninterest expense caption.


Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivatives primarily to manage risk associated with changing interest rates. The Company's derivative financial instruments consist of interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges of the Company's trust preferred capital notes. The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments at fair value as either an other asset or other liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the Company's cash flow hedges is reported as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes, and is reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings.

65

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current year. There were no material reclassifications.

Adoption of New

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

On Developments

In January 1, 2019, 2017, the Company adoptedFASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 842).350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.Among other things,ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees are required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.previous two-step impairment test. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must applyif a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The FASB made subsequent amendments to Topic 842 in July 2018 through ASU 2018-10 ("Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases.") and ASU 2018-11 ("Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements."). Among these amendments is the provision in ASU 2018-11 that provides entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new leases standard. Under this new transition method,reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustmentwill record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the opening balanceamount of retained earnings ingoodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the periodprior requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2, which requires an entity to calculate any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of adoption. Consequently, an entity's reportinggoodwill with its carrying amount. ASU 2017-04 was effective for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts the new leases standard continue to be in accordance with current GAAP (Topic 840, Leases). The Company adopted the standard using the additional (and optional) transition method. The effect of adopting this standard on January 1, 2019 was an approximately $4.4 million increase in assets and liabilities2020. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
financial statements.

In June 2016, August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement." ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements by requiring that Level 3 fair value disclosures include the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop those fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Certain disclosure requirements in Topic 820 were also removed or modified. ASU 2018-13 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020 (revised in April 2020), various regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, ("FDIC") issued an "Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus."  The interagency statement was effective immediately and impacted accounting for loan modifications. Under ASC 310-40, "Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors," a restructuring of debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The agencies confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief, are not to be considered TDRs. This includes short-term (e.g., six months) modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant. Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented. In August 2020, a joint statement on additional loan modifications was issued. Among other things, the Interagency Statement addresses accounting and regulatory reporting considerations for loan modifications, including those accounted for under Section 4013 of the CARES Act. The CARES Act  was signed into law on March 27, 2020 to help support individuals and businesses through loans, grants, tax changes and other types of relief. The most significant impacts of the CARES Act related to accounting for loan modifications and establishment of the PPP. On December 21, 2020, the Appropriations Act was passed. The Appropriations Act extends or modifies many of the relief programs first created by the CARES Act, including the PPP and treatment of certain loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This interagency guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements; however, this impact cannot be quantified at this time.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Other Authoritative Accounting Guidance

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." The amendments in this ASU, among other things, require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. For public business entities that qualifyThe FASB has issued multiple updates to ASU 2016-13 as smallercodified in Topic 326, including ASU's 2019-04,2019-05,2019-10,2019-11,2020-02, and 2020-03. These ASUs have provided for various minor technical corrections and improvements to the codification as well as other transition matters. Smaller reporting companies underwho file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules, includingand all other entities who do not file with the Company,SEC are required to apply the standard is effectiveguidance for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2022. TheAt the one-time evaluation date, the Company hasqualified as a smaller reporting company and elected to defer the adoption of ASU 2016-13 until January 1, 2023.the standard. The Company has implemented a program forwill continue to validate its models that will be used upon future adoption of the new standard and is running concurrent models withstandard. The implementation of this ASU will likely result in increases to the assistance of an outside vendor. We will update both models quarterly until the required implementation. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Company's reserves when implemented. 

In January 2017, August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, "Intangibles 2018- Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". The amendments in this ASU simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Instead, under the amendments in this ASU, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. Public business entities that are SEC filers must adopt the amendments in this ASU for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted


for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement." The amendments in this ASU modify the disclosure requirements in Topic 820 to add disclosures regarding changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty. Certain disclosure requirements in Topic 820 are also removed or modified. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Certain of the amendments are to be applied prospectively while others are to be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14,14, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20)715-20): Disclosure Framework - ChangesFramework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans." The amendments in this ASU modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. Certain disclosure requirements have been deleted while the following disclosure requirements have been added: the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates and an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. The amendments also clarify the disclosure requirements in paragraph 715-20-50-3,715-20-50-3, which state that the following information for defined benefit pension plans should be disclosed: the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") and fair value of plan assets for plans with PBOs in excess of plan assets and the accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO") and fair value of plan assets for plans with ABOs in excess of plan assets. The amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-14 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, "Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments." This ASU clarifies and improves areas of guidance related to the recently issued standards on credit losses, hedging, and recognition and measurement including improvements resulting from various Transition Resource Group meetings. The effective date of each of the amendments depends on the adoption date of ASU 2016-1, ASU 2016-03, and ASU 2017-12. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-042018-14 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

66

Effective November 25, 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05,SEC adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 119. SAB 119 updated portions of SEC interpretative guidance to align with ASC 326, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief." The amendments in this ASU provide entities that have certain instruments within the scope of Subtopic 326-20 with an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option in Subtopic 825-10, applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis for eligible instruments, upon the adoption of Topic 326. The fair value option election does not apply to held-to-maturity debt securities. An entity that elects the fair value option should subsequently measure those instruments at fair value with changes in fair value flowing through earnings. The effective date and transition methodology for the amendments in ASU 2019-05 are the same as in ASU 2016-13. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-11, "Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses." This ASU addresses issues raised by stakeholders during the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." Among other narrow-scope improvements, the new ASU clarifies guidance around how to reportIt covers topics including (1) measuring current expected recoveries. "Expected recoveries" describes a situation in which an organization recognizes a full or partial write-off of the amortized cost basiscredit losses; (2) development, governance, and documentation of a financial asset, but then later determines thatsystematic methodology; (3) documenting the amount written off, orresults of a portion of that amount, will in fact be recovered. While applying the credit losses standard, stakeholders questioned whether expected recoveries were permitted on assets that had already shown credit deterioration at the time of purchase (also known as PCD assets). systematic methodology; and (4) validating a systematic methodology.

In response to this question, the ASU permits organizations to record expected recoveries on PCD assets. In addition to other narrow technical improvements, the ASU also reinforces existing guidance that prohibits organizations from recording negative allowances for available-for-sale debt securities. The ASU includes effective dates and transition requirements that vary depending on whether or not an entity has already adopted ASU 2016-13. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12,2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740)740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes." The ASU is expected to reduce cost and complexity related to the accounting for income taxes by removing specific exceptions to general principles in Topic 740 (eliminating the need for an organization to analyze whether certain exceptions apply in a given period) and improving financial statement preparers' application of certain income tax-related guidance. This ASU is part of the FASB's simplification initiative to make narrow-scope simplifications and improvements to accounting

standards through a series of short-term projects. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-122019-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01,2020-01, "Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321)321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323)323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)815) - Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815." The ASU is based on a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force and is expected to increase comparability in accounting for these transactions. ASU 2016-012016-01 made targeted improvements to accounting for financial instruments, including providing an entity the ability to measure certain equity securities without a readily determinable fair value at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Among other topics, the amendments clarify that an entity should consider observable transactions that require it to either apply or discontinue the equity method of accounting. For public business entities, such as the Company, the amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2020-012020-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Effective November 25, 2019,

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting." The amendments in this ASU provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. It is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. The guidance is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Subsequently, in January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope." This ASU clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The ASU also amends the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2021-01 on contract modifications that change the interest rate used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment retrospectively as of any date from the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020, or prospectively to new modifications from any date within the interim period that includes or is subsequent to January 7, 2021, up to the date that financial statements are available to be issued. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2021-01 to eligible hedging relationships existing as of the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020, and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020. The Company is assessing ASU 2020-04 and its impact on the Company's transition away from LIBOR for its loan and other financial instruments.

On March 12, 2020, the SEC adopted Stafffinalized amendments to the definitions of its "accelerated filer" and "large accelerated filer" definitions. The amendments increase the threshold criteria for meeting these filer classifications and were effective on April 27, 2020. Any changes in filer status are to be applied beginning with the filer's first annual report filed with the SEC subsequent to the effective date. The rule change revises the definition of "accelerated filers" to exclude entities with public float of less than $700 million and less than $100 million in annual revenues. If an entity's annual revenues exceed $100 million, its category will change back to "accelerated filer." A public company that is classified as an "accelerated filer" or "large accelerated filer" must obtain an auditor attestation concerning the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ("ICFR") and include the opinion on ICFR in its annual report on Form 10-K. Non-accelerated filers also have additional time to file quarterly and annual financial statements. All public companies are required to obtain and file annual financial statement audits, as well as provide management's assertion on effectiveness of ICFR, but the external auditor attestation of ICFR is not required for non-accelerated filers. The Company's annual revenues exceeded $100 million in the previous year, and the Company expects its annual revenues to exceed $100 million in future years and to remain an "accelerated filer." Therefore, this change is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's annual reporting and audit requirements.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, "Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 119. SAB 119 updated portionsfor Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity." The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument and more convertible preferred stock as a single equity instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. In addition, the amendment updates the disclosure requirements for convertible instruments to increase the information transparency. For public business entities, excluding smaller reporting companies, the amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  For all other entities, the standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of SEC interpretative guidanceASU 2020-06 to align withhave a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-08, "Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables – Nonrefundable fees and Other Costs." This ASU clarifies that an entity should reevaluate whether a callable debt security is within the scope of ASC 326, "Financial Instruments paragraph 310- Credit Losses." It covers topics including (1) measuring current expected credit losses; (2) development, governance, 20-35-33 for each reporting period. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and documentationinterim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is not permitted. All entities should apply ASU 2020-08 on a prospective basis as of the beginning of the period of adoption for existing or newly purchased callable debt securities. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2020-08 to have a systematic methodology; (3) documenting the resultsmaterial impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 - Acquisitions

On April 1, 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of Roanoke-based HomeTown Bankshares Corporation ("HomeTown") and its wholly-owned subsidiary bank, HomeTown Bank. Pursuant and subject to the terms of the merger agreement, as a result of the merger, the holders of shares of HomeTown common stock received 0.4150 shares of the Company's common stock for each share of HomeTown common stock held immediately prior to the effective date of the merger.

The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and consideration exchanged were recorded at estimated fair values on the acquisition date. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition, in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.


The following table provides a preliminary assessmentdetail of the consideration transferred, assets acquired, and liabilities assumed as of the date of the acquisition (dollars in thousands):

Consideration Paid: 
Common shares issued (2,361,686)$82,470
Issuance of replacement stock options/restricted stock753
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares27
Value of consideration83,250
  
Assets acquired: 
Cash and cash equivalents26,283
Investment securities34,876
Restricted stock2,588
Loans444,324
Premises and equipment12,554
Deferred income taxes2,960
Core deposit intangible8,200
Other real estate owned1,442
Banked owned life insurance8,246
Other assets14,244
Total assets555,717
  
Liabilities assumed: 
Deposits483,626
Short-term FHLB advances14,883
Long-term FHLB advances778
Subordinated debt7,530
Other liabilities5,780
Total liabilities512,597
Net assets acquired43,120
Goodwill resulting from merger with HomeTown$40,130

Consideration Paid:

    

Common shares issued (2,361,686)

 $82,470 

Issuance of replacement stock options/restricted stock

  753 

Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares

  27 

Value of consideration

  83,250 
     

Assets acquired:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  26,283 

Investment securities

  34,876 

Restricted stock

  2,588 

Loans

  444,324 

Premises and equipment

  12,034 

Deferred income taxes

  2,960 

Core deposit intangible

  8,200 

Other real estate owned

  1,188 

Banked owned life insurance

  8,246 

Other assets

  14,244 

Total assets

  554,943 
     

Liabilities assumed:

    

Deposits

  483,626 

Short-term FHLB advances

  14,883 

Long-term FHLB advances

  778 

Subordinated debt

  7,530 

Other liabilities

  6,052 

Total liabilities

  512,869 

Net assets acquired

  42,074 

Goodwill resulting from merger with HomeTown

 $41,176 

The following table details the changes in fair value of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the amounts reported in the Form 10-Q10-K for the quarterly periodyear ended September 30,December 31, 2019 (dollars(dollars in thousands):

Goodwill at September 30, 2019$40,761
Effect of adjustments to deferred income taxes(631)
Goodwill at December 31, 2019$40,130

Goodwill at December 31, 2019

 $40,130 
Effect of adjustments to:    

Premises and equipment

  520 
Other real estate owned  254 
Other liabilities  272 

Goodwill at December 31, 2020

 $41,176 

The decreaseincrease in goodwill made during the fourthfirst quarter of 20192020 was due to adjustments to the valuations of several acquired buildings and OREO obtained on the date of merger. Also in the first quarter of 2020, the goodwill adjustment for other liabilities related to a revaluationreassessment of deferred income taxes after the filinginterest rate prevailing for supplemental early retirement plan obligations at the merger date.

68

The acquired loans were recorded at fair value at the acquisition date without carryover of HomeTown's previously established allowance for loan losses. The fair value of the loans was determined using market participant assumptions in estimating the amount and timing of both principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and leases and then applying a market-based discount rate to those cash flows. In this regard, the acquired loans were segregated into pools based on loan type and credit risk. Loan type was determined based on collateral type, purpose, and lien position. Credit risk characteristics included risk rating groups (pass rated loans and adversely classified loans), and past due status. For valuation purposes, these pools were further disaggregated by maturity, pricing characteristics (e.g., fixed-rate, adjustable-rate) and re-payment structure (e.g., interest only, fully amortizing, balloon). If newFair values determined at the acquisition date were preliminary and subject to refinement during the one-year measurement period as additional information iswas obtained regarding facts and circumstances about expected cash flows that existed as of the acquisition date, management will adjust fair values in accordance with accounting for business combinations.


date.

The acquired loans were divided into loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration, which are accounted for under ASC 310-30,310-30, Receivables - Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (acquired(purchased credit impaired), and loans that do not meet these criteria, which are accounted for under ASC 310-20,310-20, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (acquired(purchased performing).

The following table presents the acquiredpurchased credit impaired loans receivable at the acquisition date (dollars in thousands):

Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition

 $45,551 

Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)

  8,296 

Expected cash flows at acquisition

  37,255 

Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield)

  4,410 

Fair value of acquired loans accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30

 $32,845 

Direct costs related to the HomeTown acquisition were expensed as incurred. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred $11.8 million inThere were 0 merger related expenses during 2020 compared to $11,782,000 during 2019and acquisition integration expenses related to the merger, including $9.1 million in data processing termination and conversion costs, $1.7 million in legal and professional fees, $0.4 million in salary related expense, and $0.6 million in other noninterest expenses. The majority of these expenses were related to integration and are deductible for tax purposes.

$872,000 during 2018.

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisition of HomeTown had occurred on January 1, 2018.2018 (dollars in thousands, except per share data). These results combine the historical results of HomeTown in the Company's Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Incomeincome and, while certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2018. In particular, no adjustments have been made to eliminate the amount of HomeTown's provision for creditloan losses that would not have been necessary had the acquired loans been recorded at fair value as of January 1, 2018. Pro forma adjustments below include the net impact of accretion for 2018 and the elimination of merger-related costs for 2019. The Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings2019 and other business synergies as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts below (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2018.
 Pro forma Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Total revenues (1)
$95,178
 $98,232
Net income$29,841
 $27,974
Earnings per share$2.70
 $2.52
(1)

  

Pro forma Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Total revenues (1)

 $95,178  $98,232 

Net income

 $29,841  $27,974 

Earnings per share

 $2.70  $2.52 

__________________________

(1) Includes net interest income and noninterest income.

Note 3 – Restrictions on Cash

The Company is a member of the Federal Reserve System and is required to maintain certain levels of its cash and cash equivalents as reserves based on regulatory requirements. The gross reserve requirement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was zero and $14.4 million at December 31,2020and $3.0 million at December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The required balance to be maintained with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was zero and $2.6 million at December 31,2020and zero at December 31,2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The Company maintains cash accounts in other commercial banks. The amount on deposit with correspondent institutions at December 31, 20192020 exceeded the insurance limits of the Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFDIC by $678,000. $2,610,000.

69


Note 4 - Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in securities at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 December 31, 2019
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Securities available for sale:       
U.S. Treasury$14,992
 $
 $5
 $14,987
Federal agencies and GSEs126,829
 1,504
 219
 128,114
Mortgage-backed and CMOs182,732
 1,901
 393
 184,240
State and municipal41,427
 769
 42
 42,154
Corporate9,514
 186
 
 9,700
Total securities available for sale$375,494
 $4,360
 $659
 $379,195

  

December 31, 2020

 
  

Amortized

  

Unrealized

  

Unrealized

     
  

Cost

  

Gains

  

Losses

  

Fair Value

 

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $34,997  $1  $0  $34,998 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  104,092   1,976   45   106,023 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  246,770   6,117   105   252,782 

State and municipal

  57,122   1,979   2   59,099 

Corporate

  13,011   188   10   13,189 

Total securities available for sale

 $455,992  $10,261  $162  $466,091 

The Company adopted ASU 2016-012016-01 effective January 1, 2018 and had no equity securities at December 31, 2020 and December 31,2019 and recognized in income $333,000 of unrealized holding gains during 2019. During the year ended December 31,2019, the Company sold $445,000 in equity securities at fair value.

 December 31, 2018
 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Securities available for sale:       
Federal agencies and GSEs$137,070
 $442
 $3,473
 $134,039
Mortgage-backed and CMOs113,883
 385
 2,401
 111,867
State and municipal80,022
 411
 531
 79,902
Corporate6,799
 68
 22
 6,845
Total securities available for sale$337,774
 $1,306
 $6,427
 $332,653

(Dollars in thousands)  December 31, 2019             
  

Amortized

  

Unrealized

  

Unrealized

     
  

Cost

  

Gains

  

Losses

  

Fair Value

 

Securities available for sale:

                
U.S. Treasury $14,992  $0  $5  $14,987 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  126,829   1,504   219   128,114 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  182,732   1,901   393   184,240 

State and municipal

  41,427   769   42   42,154 

Corporate

  9,514   186   0   9,700 

Total securities available for sale

 $375,494  $4,360  $659  $379,195 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in debt securities at December 31, 2019,2020, by contractual maturity, are shown in the following table. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because mortgage-backed securities have both known principal repayment terms as well as unknown principal repayments due to potential borrower pre-payments, it is difficult to accurately predict the final maturity of these investments. Mortgage-backed securities are shown separately (dollars in thousands):

 Available for Sale
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
Due in one year or less$41,234
 $41,207
Due after one year through five years51,039
 51,814
Due after five years through ten years56,537
 57,763
Due after ten years43,952
 44,171
Mortgage-backed and CMOs182,732
 184,240
 $375,494
 $379,195

  

Available for Sale

 
  

Amortized

     
  

Cost

  

Fair Value

 

Due in one year or less

 $38,081  $38,120 

Due after one year through five years

  96,905   98,651 

Due after five years through ten years

  52,624   54,465 

Due after ten years

  21,612   22,073 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  246,770   252,782 
  $455,992  $466,091 

Gross realized gains and losses on, and the proceeds from the sale of, securities available for sale were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Gross realized gains$328
 $342
 $825
Gross realized losses(54) (261) (13)
Proceeds from sales of securities29,878
 57,607
 55,903

  

For the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Gross realized gains

 $814  $328  $342 

Gross realized losses

  0   (54)  (261)

Proceeds from sales of securities

  5,811   29,878   57,607 

Securities with a carrying value of approximately $189,791,000 and $179,852,000 at December 31,2020and $143,064,000 at December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law. FHLBFHLB letters of credit were used as additional collateral in the amounts of $245,000,000 at December 31,2020 and $170,000,000 at December 31, 2019 and $190,250,000 at December 31, 2018.2019.

70

Temporarily Impaired Securities

The following table shows estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2019.2020. The reference point for determining when securities are in an unrealized loss position is month-end. Therefore, it is possible that a security's market value exceeded its amortized cost on other days during the past twelve-monthtwelve-month period.

Available for sale securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 Total Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
U.S. Treasury$14,987
 $5
 $14,987
 $5
 $
 $
Federal agencies and GSEs69,095
 219
 31,779
 44
 37,316
 175
Mortgage-backed and CMOs89,391
 393
 66,324
 266
 23,067
 127
State and municipal4,262
 42
 3,108
 37
 1,154
 5
Total$177,735
 $659
 $116,198
 $352
 $61,537
 $307
U.S. Treasury: The unrealized loss associated with one U.S. Treasury bill is due to normal market fluctuations. The contractual cash flows of this investment are guaranteed by the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that this security would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the Company's investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investment and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

  

Total

  

Less than 12 Months

  

12 Months or More

 
  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

 

Federal agencies and GSEs

 $21,237  $45  $19,974  $26  $1,263  $19 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  46,640   105   46,640   105   0   0 

State and municipal

  3,456   2   3,456   2   0   0 

Corporate

  5,990   10   5,990   10   0   0 

Total

 $77,323  $162  $76,060  $143  $1,263  $19 

Federal agencies and GSEs: The unrealized losses on the Company's investment in 2614 government sponsored entities ("GSEs") were caused by interest rate increases.normal market fluctuations. Eleven of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

2020.

Mortgage-backed securities: The unrealized losses on the Company's investment in 32six GSE mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. Fifteennormal market fluctuations. None of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual cash flows of those investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the Company's investments. Because the decline in fairmarket value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

2020.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations: The unrealized losslosses associated with onefive private GSE collateralized mortgage obligationobligations ("CMO"CMOs") iswere due to normal market fluctuations. This one security has beenNone of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual cash flows of this investmentthese investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected


that this securitythe securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost basisbases of the Company's investment.investments. Because the decline in fairmarket value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investmentinvestments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investmentinvestments before recovery of its amortized cost basis,bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider this investmentthe investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.
2020.

State and municipal securities:  The unrealized losses on sixtwo state and municipal securities were caused by normal market fluctuations. These securities are of high credit quality (rated A- or higher), and principal and interest rate increases and not credit deterioration.payments have been made timely. The contractual terms of thosethese investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31,2020.

Corporate securities: The unrealized losses on two corporate securities were caused by normal market fluctuations and not credit deterioration. These securities remain investment grade, and the Company's analysis did not indicate the existence of credit loss. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

2020.

Due to restrictions placed upon the Bank's common stock investment in the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and FHLB, these securities have been classified as restricted equity securities and carried at cost. These restricted securities are not subject to the investment security classificationsclassification requirements and are included as a separate line item on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The FHLB requires the Bank to maintain stock in an amount equal to 4.25% of outstanding borrowings and a specific percentage of the Bank's total assets. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond requires the Bank to maintain stock with a par value equal to 3.0% of its outstanding capital and an additional 3.0% is on call. Restricted equity securities consist of Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond stock in the amount of $6,415,000$6,458,000 and $3,621,000$6,415,000 as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively, and FHLB stock in the amount of $2,215,000$2,257,000 and $1,626,000$2,215,000 as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively.

71

The table below shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

 Total Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
Federal agencies and GSEs$103,797
 $3,473
 $14,982
 $8
 $88,815
 $3,465
Mortgage-backed and CMOs86,852
 2,401
 5,473
 15
 81,379
 2,386
State and municipal39,755
 531
 7,199
 18
 32,556
 513
Corporate484
 22
 
 
 484
 22
Total$230,888
 $6,427
 $27,654
 $41
 $203,234
 $6,386

  

Total

  

Less than 12 Months

  

12 Months or More

 
  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

 

U.S. Treasury

 $14,987  $5  $14,987  $5  $0  $0 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  69,095   219   31,779   44   37,316   175 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  89,391   393   66,324   266   23,067   127 

State and municipal

  4,262   42   3,108   37   1,154   5 

Total

 $177,735  $659  $116,198  $352  $61,537  $307 

Other-Than-Temporary-Impaired Securities

As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, there were no securities classified as other-than-temporary impaired.

Note 5 – Loans

Loans, excluding loans held for sale, at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
 2019 2018
Commercial$339,077
 $285,972
Commercial real estate: 
  
Construction and land development137,920
 97,240
Commercial real estate899,199
 655,800
Residential real estate: 
  
Residential324,315
 209,438
Home equity119,423
 103,933
Consumer10,881
 5,093
Total loans, net of unearned income$1,830,815
 $1,357,476

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Commercial

 $491,256  $339,077 

Commercial real estate:

        

Construction and land development

  140,071   137,920 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  373,680   360,991 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  627,569   538,208 

Residential real estate:

        

Residential

  269,137   324,315 

Home equity

  104,881   119,423 

Consumer

  8,462   10,881 

Total loans, net of deferred fees and costs

 $2,015,056  $1,830,815 

Net deferred loan (fees) costs included in the above loan categories are $(3,021,000) for 2020 and $1,197,000 for 2019 and $720,000 for 2018.


2019. The balance at December 31, 2020 includes $(4,439,000) in unamortized net PPP fees.

Overdraft deposits were reclassified to consumer loans in the amount of $59,000 and $134,000 for 2020and $127,000 for 2019, and 2018, respectively.

Acquired Loans

The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans, including ASC 310-30310-30 loans, included in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 2019 2018
Outstanding principal balance$393,618
 $63,619
Carrying amount377,130
 58,886

  

2020

  

2019

 

Outstanding principal balance

 $251,730  $393,618 

Carrying amount

  241,008   377,130 

The outstanding principal balance and related carrying amount of purchased credit impaired loans, for which the Company applies ASC 310-30310-30 to account for interest earned, at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

2020

  

2019

 

Outstanding principal balance

 $37,417  $53,600 

Carrying amount

  30,201   43,028 

 2019 2018
Outstanding principal balance$53,600
 $24,500
Carrying amount43,028
 20,611
72

 

The following table presents changes in the accretable yield on purchased credit impaired loans, for which the Company applies ASC 310-30,310-30, for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 (dollars in thousands):

 2019 2018 2017
Balance at January 1$4,633
 $4,890
 $6,103
Additions from merger with HomeTown4,410
 
 
Accretion(3,304) (2,362) (3,117)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference736
 956
 1,006
Other changes, net1,418
 1,149
 898
Balance at December 31$7,893
 $4,633
 $4,890

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Balance at January 1

 $7,893  $4,633  $4,890 

Additions from merger with HomeTown

  0   4,410   0 

Accretion

  (3,553)  (3,304)  (2,362)

Reclassification from nonaccretable difference

  2,233   736   956 

Other changes, net (1)

  (60)  1,418   1,149 

Balance at December 31

 $6,513  $7,893  $4,633 

__________________________

(1)  This line item represents changes in the cash flows expected to be collected due to the impact of non-credit changes such as prepayment assumptions, changes in interest rates on variable rate acquired impaired loans, and discounted payoffs that occurred in the period.

Past Due Loans

The following table shows an analysis by portfolio segment of the Company's past due loans at December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands):

 30- 59 Days
Past Due
 60-89 Days
Past Due
 90 Days +
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 Non-
Accrual
Loans
 Total
Past
Due
 Current Total
Loans
Commercial$325
 $163
 $52
 $857
 $1,397
 $337,680
 $339,077
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development58
 
 
 11
 69
 137,851
 137,920
Commercial real estate217
 434
 
 274
 925
 898,274
 899,199
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential639
 260
 282
 685
 1,866
 322,449
 324,315
Home equity49
 90
 27
 113
 279
 119,144
 119,423
Consumer73
 13
 
 4
 90
 10,791
 10,881
Total$1,361
 $960
 $361
 $1,944
 $4,626
 $1,826,189
 $1,830,815

          

90 Days +

                 
          

Past Due

  

Non-

  

Total

         
  

30- 59 Days

  

60-89 Days

  

and Still

  

Accrual

  

Past

      

Total

 
  

Past Due

  

Past Due

  

Accruing

  

Loans

  

Due

  

Current

  

Loans

 

Commercial

 $153  $9  $0  $100  $262  $490,994  $491,256 

Commercial real estate:

                            

Construction and land development

  168   0   0   5   173   139,898   140,071 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  62   0   209   304   575   373,105   373,680 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  0   0   0   1,158   1,158   626,411   627,569 

Residential:

                            

Residential

  711   211   53   792   1,767   267,370   269,137 

Home equity

  0   0   0   69   69   104,812   104,881 

Consumer

  49   14   0   6   69   8,393   8,462 

Total

 $1,143  $234  $262  $2,434  $4,073  $2,010,983  $2,015,056 

The following table shows an analysis by portfolio segment of the Company's past due loans at December 31, 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

          

90 Days +

                 
          

Past Due

  

Non-

  

Total

         
  

30- 59 Days

  

60-89 Days

  

and Still

  

Accrual

  

Past

      

Total

 
  

Past Due

  

Past Due

  

Accruing

  

Loans

  

Due

  

Current

  

Loans

 

Commercial

 $325  $163  $52  $857  $1,397  $337,680  $339,077 

Commercial real estate:

                            

Construction and land development

  58   0   0   11   69   137,851   137,920 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  217   434   0   274   925   360,066   360,991 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  0   0   0   0   0   538,208   538,208 

Residential:

                            

Residential

  639   260   282   685   1,866   322,449   324,315 

Home equity

  49   90   27   113   279   119,144   119,423 

Consumer

  73   13   0   4   90   10,791   10,881 

Total

 $1,361  $960  $361  $1,944  $4,626  $1,826,189  $1,830,815 

73

 30- 59 Days
Past Due
 60-89 Days
Past Due
 90 Days +
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 Non-
Accrual
Loans
 Total
Past
Due
 Current Total
Loans
Commercial$20
 $
 $
 $83
 $103
 $285,869
 $285,972
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 27
 27
 97,213
 97,240
Commercial real estate42
 
 
 197
 239
 655,561
 655,800
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential456
 157
 72
 659
 1,344
 208,094
 209,438
Home equity126
 
 
 124
 250
 103,683
 103,933
Consumer21
 3
 
 
 24
 5,069
 5,093
Total$665
 $160
 $72
 $1,090
 $1,987
 $1,355,489
 $1,357,476

Impaired Loans

The following table presents the Company's impaired loan balances by portfolio segment, excluding acquired impaired loans, at December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands):

 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:         
Commercial$49
 $49
 $
 $16
 $5
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate502
 500
 
 424
 39
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential611
 612
 
 652
 38
Home equity41
 41
 
 45
 6
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 $1,203
 $1,202
 $
 $1,137
 $88
With a related allowance recorded: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$735
 $730
 $204
 $191
 $41
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
 
 
 
 
Residential 
  
  
  
  
Residential254
 254
 26
 225
 16
Home equity
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 $989
 $984
 $230
 $416
 $57
Total: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$784
 $779
 $204
 $207
 $46
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate502
 500
 
 424
 39
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential865
 866
 26
 877
 54
Home equity41
 41
 
 45
 6
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 $2,192
 $2,186
 $230
 $1,553
 $145

      

Unpaid

      

Average

  

Interest

 
  

Recorded

  

Principal

  

Related

  

Recorded

  

Income

 
  

Investment

  

Balance

  

Allowance

  

Investment

  

Recognized

 

With no related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $18  $18  $  $23  $6 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  286   283      357   27 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  1,148   1,147      766   75 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  1,096   1,103      912   62 

Home equity

  6   6      31   3 

Consumer

  0   0      0   0 
  $2,554  $2,557  $  $2,089  $173 

With a related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $39  $33  $29  $382  $15 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0   0   0 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  122   122   0   180   15 

Residential

                    

Residential

  137   137   1   256   9 

Home equity

  0   0   0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0   0   0 
  $298  $292  $30  $818  $39 

Total:

                    

Commercial

 $57  $51  $29  $405  $21 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  286   283   0   357   27 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  1,270   1,269   0   946   90 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  1,233   1,240   1   1,168   71 

Home equity

  6   6   0   31   3 

Consumer

  0   0   0   0   0 
  $2,852  $2,849  $30  $2,907  $212 

In the table above, recorded investment may exceed unpaid principal balance due to acquired loans with a premium and loans with unearned costs that exceed unearned fees.

74


The following table presents the Company's impaired loan balances by portfolio segment, excluding acquired impaired loans, at December 31, 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:         
Commercial$28
 $28
 $
 $44
 $14
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate376
 373
 
 542
 36
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential646
 646
 
 875
 29
Home equity49
 49
 
 108
 10
Consumer
 
 
 2
 
 $1,099
 $1,096
 $
 $1,571
 $89
With a related allowance recorded: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$62
 $58
 $55
 $354
 $40
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 21
 
Commercial real estate
 
 
 18
 
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential173
 173
 9
 342
 9
Home equity
 
 
 128
 1
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 $235
 $231
 $64
 $863
 $50
Total: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$90
 $86
 $55
 $398
 $54
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 21
 
Commercial real estate376
 373
 
 560
 36
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential819
 819
 9
 1,217
 38
Home equity49
 49
 
 236
 11
Consumer
 
 
 2
 
 $1,334
 $1,327
 $64
 $2,434
 $139

      

Unpaid

      

Average

  

Interest

 
  

Recorded

  

Principal

  

Related

  

Recorded

  

Income

 
  

Investment

  

Balance

  

Allowance

  

Investment

  

Recognized

 

With no related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $49  $49  $  $16  $5 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  343   341      250   26 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  159   159      174   13 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  611   612      652   38 

Home equity

  41   41      45   6 

Consumer

  0   0      0   0 
  $1,203  $1,202  $  $1,137  $88 

With a related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $735  $730  $204  $191  $41 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0   0   0 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  0   0   0   0   0 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  254   254   26   225   16 

Home equity

  0   0   0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0   0   0 
  $989  $984  $230  $416  $57 

Total:

                    

Commercial

 $784  $779  $204  $207  $46 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  343   341   0   250   26 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied  159   159      174   13 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  865   866   26   877   54 

Home equity

  41   41   0   45   6 

Consumer

  0   0   0   0   0 
  $2,192  $2,186  $230  $1,553  $145 

In the table above, recorded investment may exceed unpaid principal balance due to acquired loans with a premium and loans with unearned costs that exceed unearned fees.

75


The following table shows the detail of loans modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, included in the impaired loan balances (dollars in thousands):

 Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
Commercial
 $
 $
Commercial real estate
 
 
Home equity
 
 
Residential real estate1
 207
 207
Consumer
 
 
Total1
 $207
 $207
 Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
Commercial
 $
 $
Commercial real estate
 
 
Home equity
 
 
Residential real estate1
 11
 11
Consumer
 
 
Total1
 $11
 $11
 Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
Commercial5
 $212
 $212
Commercial real estate
 
 
Home equity2
 57
 57
Residential real estate1
 36
 36
Consumer
 
 
Total8
 $305
 $305

  

Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2020

 
      

Pre-Modification

  

Post-Modification

 
  

Number of

  

Outstanding Recorded

  

Outstanding Recorded

 
  

Contracts

  

Investment

  

Investment

 

Commercial

  1  $106  $106 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  2   1,311   1,311 

Residential real estate

  1   82   82 

Home equity

  1   6   6 

Consumer

  0   0   0 

Total

  5  $1,505  $1,505 

  

Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2019

 
      

Pre-Modification

  

Post-Modification

 
  

Number of

  

Outstanding Recorded

  

Outstanding Recorded

 
  

Contracts

  

Investment

  

Investment

 

Commercial

  0  $0  $0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

            

Residential real estate

  1   207   207 

Home equity

  0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0 

Total

  1  $207  $207 

  

Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 
      

Pre-Modification

  

Post-Modification

 
  

Number of

  

Outstanding Recorded

  

Outstanding Recorded

 
  

Contracts

  

Investment

  

Investment

 

Commercial

  0  $0  $0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Residential real estate

  1   11   11 

Home equity

  0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0 

Total

  1  $11  $11 

All loans modified as TDRs during the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 were structure modifications. The impact on the allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan modified as a TDR in 2020 was $88,000. The impact on the allowance for loan losses for one of the commercial real estate - non-owner occupied loans modified as a TDR in 2020 was $138,000; there was no impact on the allowance for loan losses for the other commercial real estate - non-owner occupied loan. There was no impact on the allowance for loan losses for the residential real estate loan and the home equity loan modified as TDRs in 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the impact on the allowance was due to specific reserves that were charged-off prior to year end. The impact on the allowance for loan losses for the residential real estate loan modified as a TDR in 2019 was $24,000. There was no impact on the allowance for loan losses for the residential real estate loansloan modified as TDRsa TDR in 2018 and 2017. In 2017, the impact on the allowance for loan losses for loans modified as TDRs in the commercial and home equity segments was $137,000 and $1,000, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no loans that subsequently defaulted within twelve months of modification. 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were three2020, the Company had one commercial loans with a total recorded investment of $109,000 and one residential real estate - non-owner occupied loan with a recorded investment of $143,000$1,052,000 that subsequently defaulted within 12 months of modification. During the years ended December 31,2019 and 2018, the Company had no loans that subsequently defaulted within twelve months of modification. The Company defines default as one or more payments that occur more than 90 days past the due date, charge-off, or foreclosure subsequent to modification. Any charge-offs resulting in default were adjusted through the allowance for loan losses.

76

In March 2020 (revised in April 2020), the federal banking agencies issued an "Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus." This was in response to the COVID-19 pandemic affecting societies and economies around the world. This guidance encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. The guidance explains that, in consultation with the FASB staff, the federal banking agencies have concluded that short-term modifications (e.g. six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current as of the implementation date of a relief program are not TDRs. The CARES Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on March 27, 2020. Section 4013 of the CARES Act also addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that COVID-19 related modifications on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 were not TDRs. The Bank implemented a DAP to provide relief to its borrowers under this guidance. The Bank provided assistance to customers with loan balances of $405.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. The balance of loans remaining in this program at December 31, 2020 was $30.0 million, or 1.5% of the total portfolio, with $18.2 million of the $30.0 million in total deferrals the result of second and third request interest deferrals. At February 28, 2021, the balance of loans remaining in this program was $25.2 million, or 1.2% of the total portfolio, with $16.7 million of the $25.2 million in total deferrals the result of second request interest deferrals. The majority of remaining modifications involved three-month deferments of interest. This interagency guidance has not had a material impact on the Company's financials and is not expected to have a material impact on ongoing operations; however, this impact cannot be quantified at this time.

The CARES Act included an initial first round allocation of $659.0 billion for loans to be issued by financial institutions through the SBA's PPP. PPP loans are forgivable, in whole or in part, if the proceeds are used for payroll and other permitted purposes in accordance with the requirements of the PPP. The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, which was passed by Congress on December 21, 2020 and then signed into law on December 27, 2020 as part of the Appropriations Act, allocated an additional $284.4 billion. These loans carry a fixed rate of 1.00% and a term of two years for the majority of the initial loans and for five years on the second round, if not forgiven, in whole or in part. Payments were deferred for the firstsix months of the loan. The loans are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. The SBA paid the Bank a processing fee based on the size of the loan. The SBA has approved over 2,700 applications as of  February 28, 2021 totaling $340.9 million in loans. The Company had outstanding net PPP loans of $211.3 million at December 31, 2020 and $226.4 million at February 28, 2021. The Bank has received processing fees of $11.2 million on the PPP loans and incurred direct origination costs of $1.8 million. The Company had net unaccreted PPP loan origination fees of $4.4 million at December 31, 2020 and $5.0 at February 28, 2021. From a funding perspective, the Bank utilized core funding sources for these loans. At December 31, 2020 and February 28, 2021, respectively, the SBA had forgiven $56.4 million and $105.8 million of PPP loans. These PPP loans are guaranteed by the SBA and, therefore, do not have a related allowance.

The loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial and residential real estate loans, commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses, construction and land development loans, and home equity loans. At December 31, 2020, the commercial real estate portfolio included concentrations of $75,235,000, $44,738,000 and $190,840,000 in hotel, restaurants, and retail, respectively. The concentrations total 15.5% of total loans, excluding loans in process.

The Company had $161,000$387,000 and $112,000$161,000 in residential real estate loans in the process of foreclosure at December 31,2020and $285,000December 31,2019, respectively, and $719,000had $285,000 in residential OREO at both December 31, 20192020 and December 31, 2018, respectively.2019.

Risk Ratings

The following table showstables show the Company's loan portfolio broken down by internal risk grading as of December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands):

Commercial and Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

 Commercial Construction and Land Development 
Commercial Real Estate
 Residential Real Estate 
Home Equity
Pass$328,488
 $130,694
 $860,615
 $316,454
 $118,960
Special Mention8,710
 4,133
 22,117
 4,370
 
Substandard1,879
 3,093
 16,467
 3,491
 463
Doubtful
 
 
 
 
Total$339,077
 $137,920
 $899,199
 $324,315
 $119,423

  

Commercial

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Home Equity

 

Pass

 $479,416  $131,770  $350,376  $612,688  $262,677  $104,608 

Special Mention

  10,956   2,505   14,621   9,196   3,665   0 

Substandard

  865   5,796   8,474   5,563   2,795   273 

Doubtful

  19   0   209   122   0   0 

Total

 $491,256  $140,071  $373,680  $627,569  $269,137  $104,881 

Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity

 Consumer
Performing$10,877
Nonperforming4
Total$10,881

  

Consumer

 

Performing

 $8,456 

Nonperforming

  6 

Total

 $8,462 

Loans classified in the Pass category typically are fundamentally sound, and risk factors are reasonable and acceptable.

77

Loans classified in the Special Mention category typically have been criticized internally, by loan review or the loan officer, or by external regulators under the current credit policy regarding risk grades.

Loans classified in the Substandard category typically have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt; they are typically characterized by the possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Loans classified in the Doubtful category typically have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified as substandard, plus the added characteristic the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values highly questionable and improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur that may salvage the debt.

Consumer loans are classified as performing or nonperforming. A loan is nonperforming when payments of interest and principal are past due 90 days or more.

The following table showstables show the Company's loan portfolio broken down by internal risk grading as of December 31, 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

Commercial and Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

 Commercial Construction and Land Development Commercial
Real Estate
 Residential Real Estate Home
Equity
Pass$285,092
 $93,000
 $647,519
 $204,261
 $103,541
Special Mention154
 1,840
 4,403
 1,685
 
Substandard726
 2,400
 3,878
 3,492
 392
Doubtful
 
 
 
 
Total$285,972
 $97,240
 $655,800
 $209,438
 $103,933

  

Commercial

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Home Equity

 

Pass

 $328,488  $130,694  $340,696  $519,919  $316,454  $118,960 

Special Mention

  8,710   4,133   13,094   9,023   4,370   0 

Substandard

  1,144   3,093   7,200   9,267   3,491   463 

Doubtful

  735   0   0   0   0   0 

Total

 $339,077  $137,920  $360,990  $538,209  $324,315  $119,423 

Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity

  

Consumer

 

Performing

 $10,877 

Nonperforming

  4 

Total

 $10,881 

 Consumer
Performing$5,093
Nonperforming
Total$5,093

Note 6 – Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments

Changes in the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments (included in other liabilities) for each of the years in the three-yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2019,2020, are presented below (dollars in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

            

Balance, beginning of year

 $13,152  $12,805  $13,603 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  8,916   456   (103)

Charge-offs

  (1,006)  (333)  (1,020)

Recoveries

  341   224   325 

Balance, end of year

 $21,403  $13,152  $12,805 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments

            

Balance, beginning of year

 $329  $217  $206 

Provision for (recovery of) unfunded commitments

  (25)  112   11 

Charge-offs

  0   0   0 

Balance, end of year

 $304  $329  $217 

78

 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Allowance for Loan Losses     
Balance, beginning of year$12,805
 $13,603
 $12,801
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses456
 (103) 1,016
Charge-offs(333) (1,020) (690)
Recoveries224
 325
 476
Balance, end of year$13,152
 $12,805
 $13,603
      
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments 
  
  
Balance, beginning of year$217
 $206
 $203
Provision for unfunded commitments112
 11
 3
Charge-offs
 
 
Balance, end of year$329
 $217
 $206

The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included in other liabilities, and the provision for unfunded commitments is included in noninterest expense. The following table presents the Company's allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and the related loan balance total by segment for the year ended December 31, 20192020 (dollars in thousands):

  Commercial 
Commercial Real Estate
 
Residential Real Estate
 Consumer Total
Allowance for Loan Losses         
Balance at December 31, 2018$2,537
 $7,246
 $2,977
 $45
 $12,805
Charge-offs(12) (6) (70) (245) (333)
Recoveries13
 9
 58
 144
 224
Provision119
 167
 58
 112
 456
Balance at December 31, 2019$2,657
 $7,416
 $3,023
 $56
 $13,152
          
Balance at December 31, 2019: 
  
  
  
  
          
Allowance for Loan Losses 
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$204
 $
 $26
 $
 $230
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,448
 7,386
 2,794
 56
 12,684
Purchased credit impaired loans5
 30
 203
 
 238
Total$2,657
 $7,416
 $3,023
 $56
 $13,152
          
Loans 
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$784
 $502
 $906
 $
 $2,192
Collectively evaluated for impairment337,312
 1,004,296
 433,121
 10,866
 1,785,595
Purchased credit impaired loans981
 32,321
 9,711
 15
 43,028
Total$339,077
 $1,037,119
 $443,738
 $10,881
 $1,830,815

  

Commercial (1)

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Consumer

  

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $2,657  $1,161  $2,474  $3,781  $3,023  $56  $13,152 

Charge-offs

  (505)  0   (17)  (165)  (117)  (202)  (1,006)

Recoveries

  65   2   12   50   85   127   341 

Provision

  1,156   764   1,871   3,960   1,076   89   8,916 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $3,373  $1,927  $4,340  $7,626  $4,067  $70  $21,403 
                             

Balance at December 31, 2020:

                            
                             

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $29  $0  $0  $0  $1  $0  $30 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  3,318   1,927   4,138   7,185   3,896   70   20,534 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  26   0   202   441   170   0   839 

Total

 $3,373  $1,927  $4,340  $7,626  $4,067  $70  $21,403 
                             

Loans

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $57  $0  $286  $1,270  $1,239  $0  $2,852 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  490,736   139,833   360,579   616,498   365,967   8,390   1,982,003 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  463   238   12,815   9,801   6,812   72   30,201 

Total

 $491,256  $140,071  $373,680  $627,569  $374,018  $8,462  $2,015,056 

__________________________

(1) Includes PPP loans, which are guaranteed by the SBA and have 0 related allowance.

The following table presents the Company's allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and the related loan balance total by segment for the year ended December 31, 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

  

Commercial

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Consumer

  

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Balance at December 31, 2018

 $2,537  $1,059  $2,420  $3,767  $2,977  $45  $12,805 

Charge-offs

  (12)  0   (6)  0   (70)  (245)  (333)

Recoveries

  13   0   9   0   58   144   224 

Provision

  119   102   51   14   58   112   456 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $2,657  $1,161  $2,474  $3,781  $3,023  $56  $13,152 
                             

Balance at December 31, 2019:

                            
                             

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $204  $0  $0  $0  $26  $0  $230 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  2,448   1,161   2,444   3,781   2,794   56   12,684 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  5   0   30   0   203   0   238 

Total

 $2,657  $1,161  $2,474  $3,781  $3,023  $56  $13,152 
                             

Loans

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $784  $0  $0  $502  $906  $0  $2,192 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  337,312   137,522   346,233   520,541   433,121   10,866   1,785,595 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  981   398   14,758   17,165   9,711   15   43,028 

Total

 $339,077  $137,920  $360,991  $538,208  $443,738  $10,881  $1,830,815 

79

 Commercial 
Commercial Real Estate
 
Residential Real Estate
 Consumer Total
Allowance for Loan Losses         
Balance at December 31, 2017$2,413
 $8,321
 $2,825
 $44
 $13,603
Charge-offs(787) (11) (86) (136) (1,020)
Recoveries69
 10
 149
 97
 325
Provision842
 (1,074) 89
 40
 (103)
Balance at December 31, 2018$2,537
 $7,246
 $2,977
 $45
 $12,805
          
Balance at December 31, 2018: 
  
  
  
  
          
Allowance for Loan Losses 
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$55
 $
 $9
 $
 $64
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,482
 7,211
 2,822
 45
 12,560
Purchased credit impaired loans
 35
 146
 
 181
Total$2,537
 $7,246
 $2,977
 $45
 $12,805
          
Loans 
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$90
 $376
 $868
 $
 $1,334
Collectively evaluated for impairment285,431
 742,365
 302,657
 5,078
 1,335,531
Purchased credit impaired loans451
 10,299
 9,846
 15
 20,611
Total$285,972
 $753,040
 $313,371
 $5,093
 $1,357,476

The allowance for loan losses is allocated to loan segments based upon historical loss factors, risk grades on individual loans, portfolio analysis of smaller balance, homogenous loans, and qualitative factors. Qualitative factors include trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, and loss rates; trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in risk selection, underwriting standards, and lending policies; experience of lending officers, other lending staff and loan review; national, regional, and local economic trends and conditions; legal, regulatory and collateral factors; and concentrations of credit.

The provision for loan losses for the 2020 period reflects an increase in the allowance based on a qualitative assessment of the declining and uncertain economic landscape in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sharp declines in employment, gross national product, housing and auto sales, housing starts and business activity in general indicate a higher risk of probable losses in the Bank's portfolio. The Bank has been actively working with borrowers at risk who were impacted by the stay-at-home orders, utilizing its DAP to include short-term deferments of principal and interest and short-term acceptance of interest-only payments. Many of the Bank's customers have applied for and received PPP loans. Management will continue to evaluate the adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses as more economic data becomes available and as changes within the Company's portfolio are known. The effects of the pandemic may require further changes in the level of allowance.

Note 7 – Premises and Equipment

Major classifications of premises and equipment at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
 2019 2018
Land$10,421
 $6,509
Buildings36,247
 28,075
Leasehold improvements1,469
 1,011
Furniture and equipment17,695
 17,521
 65,832
 53,116
Accumulated depreciation(25,984) (26,441)
Premises and equipment, net$39,848
 $26,675

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Land

 $10,267  $10,421 

Buildings

  36,173   36,247 

Leasehold improvements

  1,160   1,469 

Furniture and equipment

  19,424   17,695 
   67,024   65,832 

Accumulated depreciation

  (27,301)  (25,984)

Premises and equipment, net

 $39,723  $39,848 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 was $2,188,000, $2,064,000, and $1,775,000, and $1,877,000, respectively.

Note 8 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company records as goodwill the excessfair value of purchase pricethe consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Impairment testing is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in the previous two-step impairment test. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the prior requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2, which requires an entity to calculate any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. The Company performs its annual analysis as of June 30 each fiscal year. Accounting guidance permits preliminaryDue to the COVID-19 pandemic market conditions, the Company determined a triggering event occurred during the first quarter of 2020 and performed a qualitative assessment at March 31, 2020 and as the pandemic continued performed qualitative assessments at June 30 and September 30 and a quantitative assessment at December 31, 2020 and determined no impairment was indicated. The impact of qualitative factors to determine whether more substantialCOVID-19 on market conditions and other changes in the economic environment, operations, or other adverse events could result in future impairment testing is required. The Company chose to bypasscharges which could have a material adverse impact on the preliminary assessment and utilized a two-step process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first step tests for impairment, while the second step, if necessary, measures the impairment.  Company's operating results. No indicators of impairment were identified during the years ended December 31,2019 2018, or 2017.

2018.

Core deposit intangibles resulting from the MidCarolina acquisition in July 2011 were $6,556,000 and are beingbecame fully amortized on an accelerated basis over 108 months. at June 30, 2020. Core deposit intangibles resulting from the MainStreet Bankshares, Inc. acquisition in January 2015 were $1,839,000 and are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 120 months. Core deposit intangibles resulting from the acquisition of HomeTown in April 2019 were $8,200,000 and are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 120 months.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and intangibles for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2020, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

Goodwill

  

Intangibles

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $84,002  $7,728 

Measurement period adjustments

  1,046   0 

Amortization

     (1,637)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $85,048  $6,091 

80

 Goodwill Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2018$43,872
 $926
Additions40,130
 8,200
Amortization
 (1,398)
Balance at December 31, 2019$84,002
 $7,728

Goodwill and intangible assets at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 are as followfollows (dollars in thousands):

 
Gross Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying
Value
December 31, 2019     
Core deposit intangibles$19,708
 $(11,980) $7,728
Goodwill84,002
 
 84,002
      
December 31, 2018 
  
  
Core deposit intangibles$11,508
 $(10,582) $926
Goodwill43,872
 
 43,872

  

Gross Carrying

  

Accumulated

  

Net Carrying

 
  

Value

  

Amortization

  

Value

 

December 31, 2020

            

Core deposit intangibles

 $19,708  $(13,617) $6,091 

Goodwill

  85,048      85,048 
             

December 31, 2019

            

Core deposit intangibles

 $19,708  $(11,980) $7,728 

Goodwill

  84,002      84,002 

Amortization expense of core deposit intangibles for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 was $1,637,000, $1,398,000, $265,000, and $528,000,$265,000, respectively.  As of December 31, 2019,2020, the estimated future amortization expense of core deposit intangibles is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year

 

Amount

 

2021

 $1,464 

2022

  1,260 

2023

  1,069 

2024

  800 

2025

  617 

2026 and after

  881 

Total

 $6,091 

YearAmount
2020$1,637
20211,464
20221,260
20231,069
2024800
2025 and after1,498
Total$7,728

Note 9 – Leases

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-022016-02 "Leases (Topic 842)842)" and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842. The Company elected the prospective application approach provided by ASU 2018-112018-11 and did not adjust prior periods for ASC 842. The Company also elected certain practical expedients within the standard and, consistent with such elections, did not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, did not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and did not reassess any initial direct costs for existing leases. As stated in the Company's 2018 Form 10-K, theThe implementation of the new standard resulted in recognition of a right-of-use asset and lease liability of $4.4 million at the date of adoption, which is related to the Company's lease of premises used in operations. In connection with the HomeTown merger in 2019,the Company added $1.8 million to the right-of-use asset and lease liability. The aggregate right-of-use asset and lease liability are included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments and are presented at each reporting date as the net present value of the remaining contractual cash flows. Cash flows are discounted at the Company's incremental borrowing rate in effect at the commencement date of the lease. Right-of-use assets represent the Company's right to use the underlying asset for the lease term and are calculated as the sum of the lease liability and if applicable, prepaid rent, initial direct costs and any incentives received from the lessor.

The Company's long-term lease agreements are classified as operating leases. Certain of these leases offer the option to extend the lease term, and the Company has included such extensions in its calculation of the lease liabilities to the extent the options are reasonably assuredcertain of being exercised. The lease agreements do not provide for residual value guarantees and have no restrictions or covenants that would impact dividends or require incurring additional financial obligations.

The following tables present information about the Company's leases as of and for the yearyears ended December 31,2020 and December 31, 2019 (dollars(dollars in thousands):

  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Lease liabilities

 $4,940  $5,369 

Right-of-use assets

 $4,878  $5,340 

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)

  7.33   8.17 

Weighted average discount rate

  3.03%  3.21%

81
 December 31, 2019
Lease liabilities$5,369
Right-of-use assets$5,340
Weighted average remaining lease term8.17 years
Weighted average discount rate3.21%


 
  

Year Ended December 31, 2020

  

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

Lease cost

        

Operating lease cost

 $993  $1,040 

Short-term lease cost

  3   3 

Total lease cost

 $996  $1,043 
         

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

 $959  $1,013 

A maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total of operating lease liabilities is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Lease payments due 
As of December 31, 2019
  2020$959
  2021943
  2022920
  2023817
  2024499
  2025 and after2,022
Total undiscounted cash flows$6,160
Discount(791)
Lease liabilities$5,369

Lease payments due

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

2021

 $1,048 

2022

  1,044 

2023

  945 

2024

  516 

2025

  473 

2026 and after

  1,549 

Total undiscounted cash flows

 $5,575 

Discount

  (635)

Lease liabilities

 $4,940 

Lease expense, a component of occupancy and equipment expense, for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 was $1,158,000, $1,187,000, $919,000, and $961,000,$919,000, respectively. The amounts recognized in lease expense include insurance, property taxes, and common area maintenance.

Note 10 - Deposits

The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $250,000$250,000 or more at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 was $170,089,000 and $200,712,000, and $159,996,000, respectively.

At December 31, 2019,2020, the scheduled maturities and amounts of certificates of deposits (included in "time"interest-bearing deposits on the consolidated balance sheet)sheets) were as follows (dollars in thousands):

YearAmount
2020$242,784
2021127,672
202249,426
202331,401
202416,175
2025 and after4,312
Total$471,770

Year

 

Amount

 

2021

 $271,868 

2022

  58,544 

2023

  31,486 

2024

  15,596 

2025

  13,898 

2026 and after

  5,034 

Total

 $396,426 

There were no brokered time deposits at December 31, 20192020 or December 31, 2018.2019. Time deposits through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service ("CDARS") program totaled $4,342,000 at December 31,2020 compared to $14,864,000 at December 31, 2019 compared to $22,431,000 at December 31, 2018.2019. Deposits through the CDARS program are generated from major customers with substantial relationships with the Bank.


Note 11 – Short-term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of customer repurchase agreements, overnight borrowings from the FHLB, and federal funds purchased, and a promissory note.purchased. The Company has federal funds lines of credit established with one correspondent bankbanks in the amount of $15,000,000$60,000,000 and another correspondent bank in the amount of $10,000,000, and additionally, has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's discount window. On August 21, 2019, the Company secured a $3,000,000 line of credit with a regional commercial bank at 0.25% under Prime maturing August 21, 2020. There were no outstanding borrowings on this line at December 31, 2019. The Company paid $4,000 in interest on this line during 2019. Customer repurchase agreements are collateralized by securities of the U.S. Government, its agencies or GSEs. They mature daily. The interest rates are generally fixed but may be changed at the discretion of the Company. The securities underlying these agreements remain under the Company's control. FHLB overnight borrowings contain floating interest rates that may change daily at the discretion of the FHLB. Short-term borrowings consisted solely of the following at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 
  

Amount

  Weighted Average Rate  

Amount

  Weighted Average Rate 

Customer repurchase agreements

 $42,551   0.13% $40,475   1.40%

 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Amount Weighted Average Rate Amount Weighted Average Rate
Customer repurchase agreements$40,475
 1.40% $35,243
 1.67%
82

Note 12 – Long-term Borrowings

Under the terms of its collateral agreement with the FHLB, the Company provides a blanket lien covering all of its residential first mortgage loans, second mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, and commercial real estate loans. In addition, the Company pledges as collateral its capital stock in the FHLB and deposits with the FHLB. The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 30% of the Company's assets, subject to the amount of collateral pledged. As of December 31, 2019, $846,767,0002020,$897,979,000 in eligible collateral was pledged under the blanket floating lien agreement which covers both short-term and long-term borrowings.

There were no long-term borrowings as of December 31, 20192020 or 2018.

2019.

In the regular course of conducting its business, the Company takes deposits from political subdivisions of the states of Virginia and North Carolina. At December 31, 2019,2020, the Bank's public deposits totaled $256,984,000.$326,774,000. The Company is required to provide collateral to secure the deposits that exceed the insurance coverage provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.FDIC. This collateral can be provided in the form of certain types of government or agency bonds or letters of credit from the FHLB. At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company had $170,000,000$245,000,000 in letters of credit with the FHLB outstanding as well as $126,814,000$136,213,000 in agency, state, and municipal securities to provide collateral for such deposits.

Note 13 – Subordinated Debt

On April 1, 2019, in connection with the HomeTown merger, the Company assumed $7,500,000 in aggregate principal amount of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes issued to various institutional accredited investors. The notes have a maturity date of December 30,2025 and havehad an annual fixed interest rate of 6.75% until December 30, 2020. Thereafter, the notes will have a floating interest rate based on LIBOR. Interest will bewas paid semi-annually, in arrears, on June 30 and December 30 of each year during the time that the notes remain outstanding through the fixed interest rate period or earlier redemption date.period. Interest will be paid quarterly, in arrears, on March 30, June 30, September 30, and December 30 throughout the floating interest rate period or earlier redemption date.

The indebtedness evidenced by the notes, including principal and interest, is unsecured and subordinate and junior in right of the Company's payments to general and secured creditors and depositors of the Bank. The notes are redeemable, without penalty, on or after December 30, 2020 and were redeemable in certain limited circumstances prior to that date. The notes limit the Company from declaring or paying any dividend, or making any distribution on capital stock or other equity securities of any kind of the Company if the Company is not "well capitalized" for regulatory purposes, immediately prior to the declaration of such dividend or distribution, except for dividends payable solely in shares of common stock of the Company.

The carrying value of the subordinated debt includesincluded a fair value adjustment of $17,000 at December 31,2019. The original fair value adjustment of $30,000 was recorded as a result of the acquisition of HomeTown on April 1, 2019, and is beingwas amortized into interest expense through December 30, 2020.


Note 14 – Junior Subordinated Debt

On April 7, 2006, AMNB Statutory Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $20,000,000 of preferred securities in a private placement pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration. The Trust Preferred Securities mature on June 30,2036, but may be redeemed at the Company's option beginning on September 30, 2011. Initially, the securities required quarterly distributions by the trust to the holder of the Trust Preferred Securities at a fixed rate of 6.66%. Effective September 30, 2011, the rate resets quarterly at the three-monththree-month LIBOR plus 1.35%. Distributions are cumulative and will accrue from the date of original issuance but may be deferred by the Company from time to time for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods. The Company has guaranteed the payment of all required distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities. The proceeds of the Trust Preferred Securities received by the trust, along with proceeds of $619,000 received by the trust from the issuance of common securities by the trust to the Company, were used to purchase $20,619,000 of the Company's junior subordinated debt securities (the "Trust Preferred Capital Notes"), issued pursuant to a junior subordinated debenture entered into between the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee. The proceeds of the Trust Preferred Securities were used to fund the cash portion of the merger consideration to the former shareholders of Community First in connection with the Company's acquisition of that company, and for general corporate purposes.

On July 1, 2011, in connection with the MidCarolina merger, the Company assumed $8,764,000 in junior subordinated debentures to the MidCarolina Trusts, to fully and unconditionally guarantee the preferred securities issued by the MidCarolina Trusts. These long-term obligations, which currently qualify as Tier 1 capital, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the MidCarolina Trusts' obligations. The MidCarolina Trusts are not consolidated in the Company's financial statements.

83

In accordance with ASC 810-10-15-14, 810-10-15-14,Consolidation - Overall - Scope and Scope Exceptions, the Company did not eliminate through consolidation the Company's $619,000 equity investment in AMNB Statutory Trust I or the $264,000 equity investment in the MidCarolina Trusts. Instead, the Company reflected thisthese equity investmentinvestments in other assets in the "Accrued interest receivable and other assets" line item in theCompany's consolidated balance sheets.

.

A description of the junior subordinated debt securities outstanding payable to the trusts is shown below (dollars in thousands):

        Principal Amount
        As of December 31,
Issuing Entity 
Date Issued
 
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
 2019 2018
AMNB Trust I 4/7/2006 Libor plus 1.35% 6/30/2036 $20,619
 $20,619
MidCarolina Trust I 10/29/2002 Libor plus 3.45% 11/7/2032 4,433
 4,377
MidCarolina Trust II 12/3/2003 Libor plus 2.95% 10/7/2033 2,977
 2,931
        $28,029
 $27,927

     

Principal Amount

 
     

As of December 31,

 

Issuing Entity

Date Issued

Interest Rate

Maturity Date

 

2020

  

2019

 

AMNB Trust I

4/7/2006

Libor plus 1.35%

6/30/2036

 $20,619  $20,619 

MidCarolina Trust I

10/29/2002

Libor plus 3.45%

11/7/2032

  4,489   4,433 

MidCarolina Trust II

12/3/2003

Libor plus 2.95%

10/7/2033

  3,022   2,977 
     $28,130  $28,029 

The principal amounts reflected above for the MidCarolina Trusts as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are net of fair value marksadjustments of $666,000 and $587,000 at December 31, 2020 and $722,000 and $632,000 at December 31, 2019, respectively. The original fair value marksadjustments of $1,197,000 and $1,021,000 were recorded as a result of the merger withacquisition of MidCarolina on July 1, 2011, and are being amortized into interest expense over the remaining lives of the respective borrowings.

Note 15 - Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative financial instruments ("derivatives") primarily to manage risks associated with changing interest rates. The Company's derivatives are hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (cash flow or fair value hedge).

The Company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges when they are used to manage exposure to variability in cash flows on variable rate borrowings such as the Company's Trust Preferred Capital Notes. The Company uses interest rate swap agreements as part of its hedging strategy by exchanging variable-rate interest payments on a notional amount equal to the principal amount of the borrowings for fixed-rate interest payments, with such interest rates set based on benchmarked interest rates.

All interest rate swaps were entered into with counterparties that met the Company's credit standards and the agreements contain collateral provisions protecting the at-risk party. The Company believes that the credit risk inherent in these derivative contracts is not significant.


Terms and conditions of the interest rate swaps vary and amounts receivable or payable are recognized as accrued under the terms of the agreements. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship on a periodic basis. In accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, the effective portions of the derivatives' unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Based on the Company's assessment, its cash flow hedges are highly effective, but to the extent that any ineffectiveness exists in the hedge relationships, the amounts would be recorded in the Company's consolidated statements of income.

(Dollars in thousands)December 31, 2019
 Notional Amount Positions Assets Liabilities Cash Collateral Pledged
Cash flow hedges:         
Interest rate swaps:         
Variable-rate to fixed-rate swaps with counterparty$28,500
 3
 $
 $2,658
 $3,450
(Dollars in thousands)December 31, 2018
 Notional Amount Positions Assets Liabilities Cash Collateral Pledged
Cash flow hedges:         
Interest rate swaps:         
Variable-rate to fixed-rate swaps with counterparty$28,500
 3
 $
 $804
 $650

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 
  

Notional Amount

  

Positions

  

Assets

  

Liabilities

  

Cash Collateral Pledged

 

Cash flow hedges:

                    

Interest rate swaps:

                    

Variable-rate to fixed-rate swaps with counterparty

 $28,500  $3  $0  $4,868  $5,750 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2019

 
  

Notional Amount

  

Positions

  

Assets

  

Liabilities

  

Cash Collateral Pledged

 

Cash flow hedges:

                    

Interest rate swaps:

                    

Variable-rate to fixed-rate swaps with counterparty

 $28,500  $3  $0  $2,658  $3,450 

In addition, the Company has commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors which are considered derivatives. It is the Company's practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of change in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans. These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated in hedge relationships.

Note 16 – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company's 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2018"2018 Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on February 20, 2018 and approved by shareholders on May 15, 2018 at the Company's 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2018 Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock awards, incentive and non-statutory options, and other equity-based awards to employees and directors at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2018 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 675,000 shares of common stock. The 2018 Plan replaced the Company's stock incentive plan that was approved by the shareholders at the 2008 Annual Meeting that expired in February 2018 (the "2008 Plan").

2018.

Stock Options

Accounting guidance requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements with measurement based upon the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.


A summary of stock option transactions for the year ended December 31, 20192020 is as follows:

 
Option
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)
Outstanding at December 31, 201813,200
 $21.97
    
Replacement stock options40,753
 16.63
    
Granted
 
    
Exercised(37,104) 18.53
    
Forfeited(2,075) 16.63
    
Expired(830) 16.63
    
Outstanding at December 31, 201913,944
 $16.63
 4.97 years $320
Exercisable at December 31, 201913,944
 $16.63
 4.97 years $320

          

Weighted

     
      

Weighted

  

Average

  

Aggregate

 
      

Average

  

Remaining

  

Intrinsic

 
  

Option

  

Exercise

  

Contractual Term

  

Value

 
  

Shares

  

Price

  

(In Years)

  ($000) 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

  13,944  $16.63         

Granted

  0   0         

Exercised

  (2,573)  16.63         

Forfeited

  (830)  16.63         

Expired

  0   0         

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

  10,541  $16.63   3.97  $101 

Exercisable at December 31, 2020

  10,541  $16.63   3.97  $101 

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2019.2020. This amount changes based on changes in the fair value of the Company's common stock.

The total proceeds of the in-the-money options exercised during the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 were $43,000, $688,000, $861,000, and $113,000,$861,000, respectively. Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 was $42,000, $616,000, and $732,000, and $287,000, respectively.

In connection with the HomeTown acquisition, there was $147,000 in recognized stock compensation expense attributable to outstanding stock options in the year ended December 31,2019. There was no0 recognized stock compensation expense attributable to outstanding stock options in 20182020 and 2017.2018. As of December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, there was no0 unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding stock options.

The following table summarizes information related to stock options outstanding on December 31, 2019:

Options Outstanding and Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number of
Outstanding
Options
 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
$15.01 to $20.00 13,944
 4.97 years $16.63
No2020:

Options Outstanding and Exercisable

 
      

Weighted-Average

     
  

Number of

  

Remaining

     

Range of

 

Outstanding

  

Contractual Life

  

Weighted-Average

 

Exercise Prices

 

Options

  

(In Years)

  

Exercise Price

 

$15.00 to $20.00

  10,541   3.97  $16.63 

NaN stock options were granted in 2020,2019 2018 and 2017.2018.

85


Restricted Stock

The Company from time-to-time grants shares of restricted stock to key employees and non-employee directors. These awards help align the interests of these employees and directors with the interests of the shareholders of the Company by providing economic value directly related to increases in the value of the Company's common stock. The value of the stock awarded is established as the fair market value of the stock at the time of the grant. The Company recognizes expense, equal to the total value of such awards, ratably over the vesting period of the stock grants. Restricted stock granted in 20192020 cliff vests at the end of a 36-month period beginning on the date of grant. Nonvested restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 20192020 is summarized in the following table:

Restricted StockShares 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Value Per Share
Nonvested at December 31, 201852,798
 $31.71
Replacement stock awards7,137
 27.28
Granted22,274
 32.79
Vested(23,572) 23.70
Forfeited(1,366) 33.22
Nonvested at December 31, 201957,271
 34.84

      Weighted 
      

Average Grant

 
  

Shares

  

Date Value Per Share

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2019

  57,271  $34.84 

Granted

  26,010   34.42 

Vested

  (19,526)  34.50 

Forfeited

  (5,216)  34.29 

Nonvested at December 31, 2020

  58,539   34.81 

As of December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, there was $797,000, $751,000, $647,000, and $538,000,$647,000, respectively, in unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock granted under the 2008 Plan and the 2018 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over the next 12 to 36 months. The share based compensation expense for nonvested restricted stock was $672,000, $915,000, and $610,000 during 2020,2019,and $532,000 during 2018, respectively. The expense for 2019 2018, and 2017, respectively.

included $257,000 of accelerated compensation expense as a result of the HomeTown merger.

Starting in 2010, the Company began offering its outside directors alternatives with respect to director compensation. TheFor 2020, the regular quarterly board retainer could be received in the form of shares of immediately vested but restricted stock with a market value of $10,000. Monthly meeting fees could be received as $800 per meeting in cash or $1,000 in immediately vested but restricted stock. For 2019, the regular monthly board retainer cancould be received quarterly in the form of immediately vested but restricted stock with a market value of $7,500. Monthly meeting fees cancould be received as $725 per meeting in cash or $900 in immediately vested but restricted stock. For 2019, 12 of the 13 outside directors elected to receive stock in lieu of cash for either all of part of their retainer or meeting fees. Only outside directors receive board fees. The Company issued 27,986, 17,373 15,471 and 13,09315,471 shares and recognized share based compensation expense of $779,000, $626,000, and $586,000 during 2020,2019and $484,000 during 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Note 17 – Income Taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the states of Virginia and North Carolina. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2016.


2017.

The components of the Company's net deferred tax assets were as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Allowance for loan losses

 $4,636  $2,841 

Nonaccrual loan interest

  507   490 

Other real estate owned valuation allowance

  124   120 

Deferred compensation

  159   1,184 

Acquisition accounting adjustments

  3,404   3,670 

Lease liability, net of right of use asset

  13   0 

Accrued pension liability

  447   50 

NOL Carryforward

  0   456 

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

  1,022   573 

Other

  318   601 

Total deferred tax assets

  10,630   9,985 
         

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Depreciation

  1,352   1,079 

Core deposit intangibles

  1,315   1,669 

Accrued pension liability

  213   0 
Deferred loan origination costs, net  533   258 

Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale

  2,180   541 

Other

  32   574 

Total deferred tax liabilities

  5,625   4,121 

Net deferred tax assets

 $5,005  $5,864 

86

 December 31,
 2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Allowance for loan losses$2,841
 $2,868
Nonaccrual loan interest490
 460
Other real estate owned valuation allowance120
 69
Deferred compensation1,184
 832
Net unrealized losses on securities
 1,147
Acquisition accounting adjustments3,670
 734
Accrued pension liability50
 36
NOL Carryforward456
 
Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges573
 180
Other601
 420
Total deferred tax assets9,985
 6,746
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Depreciation1,079
 759
Accretion of discounts on securities
 24
Core deposit intangibles1,669
 208
Net unrealized gains on securities799
 
Other574
 238
Total deferred tax liabilities4,121
 1,229
Net deferred tax assets$5,864
 $5,517

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Current tax expense$3,793
 $5,090
 $7,355
Deferred tax expense1,068
 556
 724
Deferred tax asset adjustment for tax rate change
 
 2,747
Total income tax expense$4,861
 $5,646
 $10,826

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Current tax expense

 $7,777  $3,793  $5,090 

Deferred tax expense

  (640)  1,068   556 

Total income tax expense

 $7,137  $4,861  $5,646 

A reconcilement of the "expected" federal income tax expense to reported income tax expense is as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Expected federal tax expense

 $7,808  $5,411  $5,927 

Nondeductible interest expense

  31   67   69 

Tax-exempt interest

  (259)  (478)  (504)

State income taxes

  207   149   337 

Other, net

  (650)  (288)  (183)

Total income tax expense

 $7,137  $4,861  $5,646 

 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Expected federal tax expense$5,411
 $5,927
 $9,126
Tax impact from enacted change in tax rate
 
 2,747
Nondeductible interest expense67
 69
 85
Tax-exempt interest(478) (504) (949)
State income taxes149
 337
 296
Other, net(288) (183) (479)
Total income tax expense$4,861
 $5,646
 $10,826
Income tax expense for 2017 includes a downward adjustment of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $2,747,000, recorded as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017 (the "Tax Reform Act"). The Tax Reform Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018.

Note 18 – Earnings Per Common Share

The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per common share and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock. Potentially dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common shareholders. Nonvested restricted shares are included in the computation of basic earnings per share as the holder is entitled to full shareholder benefits during the vesting period including voting rights and sharing in nonforfeitable dividends.

 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 Shares 
Per Share
Amount
 Shares 
Per Share
Amount
 Shares 
Per Share
Amount
Basic earnings per share10,531,572
 $1.99
 8,698,014
 $2.60
 8,641,717
 $1.76
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options9,765
 (0.01) 10,448
 (0.01) 18,911
 
Diluted earnings per share10,541,337
 $1.98
 8,708,462
 $2.59
 8,660,628
 $1.76

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
      

Per Share

      

Per Share

      

Per Share

 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

 

Basic earnings per share

  10,981,623  $2.74   10,531,572  $1.99   8,698,014  $2.60 

Effect of dilutive securities - stock options

  4,167   (0.01)  9,765   (0.01)  10,448   (0.01)

Diluted earnings per share

  10,985,790  $2.73   10,541,337  $1.98   8,708,462  $2.59 

Outstanding stock options on common stock, which were not included in computing diluted earnings per share in 2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 because their effects were anti-dilutive, were zero shares for 2020,2019, and 2018, and 330 shares for 2017.2018.

Note 19 – Off-Balance Sheet Activities

The Company is party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if applicable, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer.

The Company's exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk were outstanding at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
 2019 2018
Commitments to extend credit$557,364
 $362,586
Standby letters of credit13,611
 15,555
Mortgage loan rate lock commitments10,791
 9,710

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Commitments to extend credit

 $503,272  $557,364 

Standby letters of credit

  17,355   13,611 

Mortgage loan rate lock commitments

  26,883   10,791 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. These commitments generally consist of unused portions of lines of credit issued to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.

At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company had locked-rate commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to approximately $10,791,000$26,883,000 and loans held for sale of $2,027,000.$15,591,000. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts, though the Company has never experienced a failure of one of its counterparties to perform. If a loan becomes past due 90 days within 180 days of sale, the Company would be required to repurchase the loan.

Note 20 – Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of business, loans are granted to executive officers, directors, and their related entities. Management believes that all such loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans to similar, unrelated borrowers, and do not involve more than a normal risk of collectibility or


present other unfavorable features. As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018, 2019,none of these loans was restructured, past due, or on nonaccrual status.

An analysis of these loans for 20192020 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2018$18,074
Additions8,421
Repayments(9,738)
Reclassifications(1)
(7,163)
Balance at December 31, 2019$9,594
(1)

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $9,594 

Additions

  3,751 

Repayments

  (4,760)

Reclassifications(1)

  (63)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $8,522 

__________________________

(1) Includes loans to persons no longer affiliated with the Company and therefore not considered related party loans as of period end.

Related party deposits totaled $16,436,000 at December 31,2020 and $14,741,000 at December 31, 2019 and $18,280,000 at December 31, 2018.2019.

88


Note 21 – Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Plan

The Company previously maintained a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan which covered substantially all employees who were 21 years of age or older and who had at least one year of service. The Company froze its pension plan to new participants and converted its pension plan to a cash balance plan effective December 31, 2009. Each year, existing participants will receive, with some adjustments, income based on the yield of the 10 year U.S. Treasury Note in December of the preceding year. Information pertaining to the activity in the plan is as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

            

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 $6,262  $5,812  $8,313 

Service cost

  0   0   0 

Interest cost

  152   209   235 

Actuarial (gain) loss

  814   489   (782)

Settlement gain (loss)

  44   (12)  (120)

Benefits paid

  (1,451)  (236)  (1,834)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

  5,821   6,262   5,812 
             

Change in Plan Assets:

            

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  5,915   5,653   7,556 

Actual return (loss) on plan assets

  237   498   (69)

Benefits paid

  (1,451)  (236)  (1,834)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  4,701   5,915   5,653 
             

Funded Status at End of Year

 $(1,120) $(347) $(159)
             

Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets

            

Other liabilities

 $(1,120) $(347) $(159)
             

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

          �� 

Net actuarial loss

 $2,071  $1,658  $1,594 

Deferred income taxes

  (435)  (358)  (357)

Amount recognized

 $1,636  $1,300  $1,237 

  

As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

            

Service cost

 $0  $0  $0 

Interest cost

  152   209   235 

Expected return on plan assets

  (285)  (269)  (353)

Recognized net loss due to settlement

  352   52   540 

Recognized net actuarial loss

  140   133   272 

Net periodic benefit cost

 $359  $125  $694 
             

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss

            

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 $413  $64  $(1,291)

Amortization of prior service cost

  0   0   0 

Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss

 $413  $64  $(1,291)
             

Total Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss

 $772  $189  $(597)

 As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Change in Benefit Obligation:     
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year$5,812
 $8,313
 $7,932
Service cost
 
 
Interest cost209
 235
 237
Actuarial (gain) loss489
 (782) 611
Settlement gain(236) (120) (3)
Benefits paid(12) (1,834) (464)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year6,262
 5,812
 8,313
      
Change in Plan Assets: 
  
  
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year5,653
 7,556
 7,647
Actual return (loss) on plan assets498
 (69) 373
Benefits paid(236) (1,834) (464)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year5,915
 5,653
 7,556
      
Funded Status at End of Year$(347) $(159) $(757)
      
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets 
  
  
Other liabilities$(347) $(159) $(757)
      
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
Net actuarial loss$1,658
 $1,594
 $2,886
Deferred income taxes(358) (357) (606)
Amount recognized$1,300
 $1,237
 $2,280
      
 As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost 
  
  
Service cost$
 $
 $
Interest cost209
 235
 237
Expected return on plan assets(269) (353) (353)
Recognized net loss due to settlement52
 540
 135
Recognized net actuarial loss133
 272
 218
Net periodic benefit cost$125
 $694
 $237
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss     
Net actuarial (gain) loss$64
 $(1,291) $234
Amortization of prior service cost
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss$64
 $(1,291) $234
      
Total Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss$189
 $(597) $471
89


The accumulated benefit obligation as of December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 20172018 was $5,821,000, $6,262,000, $5,812,000, and $8,313,000,$5,812,000, respectively. The rate of compensation increase is no longer applicable since the defined benefit plan was frozen and converted to a cash balance plan.

The plan sponsor selected the expected long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption in consultation with their investment advisors and actuary. This rate was intended to reflect the average rate of earnings expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested to provide plan benefits. Historical performance is reviewed, especially with respect to real rates of return (net of inflation), for the major asset classes held or anticipated to be held by the trust, and for the trust itself. Undue weight is not given to recent experience that may not continue over the measurement period, with higher significance placed on current forecasts of future long-term economic conditions.

Because assets are held in a qualified trust, anticipated returns are not reduced for taxes. Further, solely for this purpose, the plan is assumed to continue in force and not terminate during the period in which assets are invested. However, consideration is given to the potential impact of current and future investment policy, cash flow into and out of the trust, and expenses (both investment and non-investment) typically paid from plan assets (to the extent such expenses are not explicitly estimated within periodic cost).

Below is a description of the plan's assets. The plan's weighted-average asset allocations by asset category are as follows as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018:

Asset CategoryDecember 31,
 2019 2018
Fixed Income61.8% 68.0%
Equity27.5% 25.2%
Cash and Accrued Income10.7% 6.8%
Total100.0% 100.0%
2019:

Asset Category

 

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Fixed Income

  65.6%  61.8%

Equity

  31.5%  27.5%

Cash and Accrued Income

  2.9%  10.7%

Total

  100.0%  100.0%

The investment policy and strategy for plan assets can best be described as a growth and income strategy. Diversification is accomplished by limiting the holding of any one equity issuer to no more than 5% of total equities. Exchange traded funds are used to provide diversified exposure to the small capitalization and international equity markets. All fixed income investments are rated as investment grade, with the majority of these assets invested in corporate issues. The assets are managed by the Company's Trust and Investment Services Division. No derivatives are used to manage the assets. Equity securities do not include holdings in the Company.

The fair value of the Company's pension plan assets at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, by asset category are as follows (dollars in thousands):

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

2020

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Cash

 $138  $138  $0  $0 

Fixed income securities

                

Government sponsored entities

  444   0   444   0 

Municipal bonds and notes

  2,147   0   2,147   0 

Corporate bonds and notes

  491   0   491   0 

Equity securities

                

U.S. companies

  1,259   1,259   0   0 

Foreign companies

  222   222   0   0 
  $4,701  $1,619  $3,082  $0 

90
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
 Balance at December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Asset Category2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cash$636
 $636
 $
 $
Fixed income securities 
  
  
  
Government sponsored entities1,648
 
 1,648
 
Municipal bonds and notes1,792
 
 1,792
 
Corporate bonds and notes212
 
 212
 
Equity securities 
  
  
  
U.S. companies1,385
 1,385
 
 
Foreign companies242
 242
 
 
 $5,915
 $2,263
 $3,652
 $


   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using
 Balance at December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Asset Category2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cash$359
 $359
 $
 $
Fixed income securities 
  
  
  
Government sponsored entities2,119
 
 2,119
 
Municipal bonds and notes1,513
 
 1,513
 
Corporate bonds and notes237
 
 237
 
Equity securities 
  
  
  
U.S. companies1,227
 1,227
 
 
Foreign companies198
 198
 
 
 $5,653
 $1,784
 $3,869
 $
 
      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

2019

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Cash

 $636  $636  $0  $0 

Fixed income securities

                

Government sponsored entities

  1,648   0   1,648   0 

Municipal bonds and notes

  1,792   0   1,792   0 

Corporate bonds and notes

  212   0   212   0 

Equity securities

                

U.S. companies

  1,385   1,385   0   0 

Foreign companies

  242   242   0   0 
  $5,915  $2,263  $3,652  $0 

Projected benefit payments for the years 20202021 to 20292030 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

YearAmount
2020$496
2021637
2022346
2023960
2024242
2025 - 20293,031
401(k)

Year

  

Amount

 

2021

  $629 

2022

   381 

2023

   910 

2024

   252 

2025

   1,204 
2026 - 2030   2,390 

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k)401(k) plan that covers substantially all full-time employees of the Company. The Company matches a portion of the contribution made by employee participants after at least one year of service. The Company contributed $1,038,000, $932,000, $778,000, and $763,000$778,000 to the 401(k)401(k) plan in 2020,2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, respectively. These amounts are included in employee benefits expense for the respective years.

Deferred Compensation Arrangements

Prior to 2015, the Company maintained deferred compensation agreements with former employees providing for annual payments to each ranging from $25,000 to $50,000 per year for ten years upon their retirement. The liabilities under these agreements are being accrued over the officers' remaining periods of employment so that, on the date of their retirement, the then-present value of the annual payments would have been accrued. As of December 31, 2019,2020, the Company only had one remaining agreement under which payments are being made to a former officer. The liabilities were $200,000 and $250,000 at December 31,2020and $300,000 at December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. TheThere was 0 expense for these agreements was $0, $0, and $3,000 for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.2018. As a result of acquisitions, the Company has various agreements with current and former employees and executives with balances of $5,585,000 and $5,235,000 at December 31,2020and $3,412,000 at December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively that accrue through eligibility and are payable upon retirement.

Beginning in 2015, certain named executive officers became eligible to participate in a voluntary, nonqualified deferred compensation plan pursuant to which the officers may defer any portion of their annual cash incentive payments. In addition, the Company may make discretionary cash bonus contributions to the deferred compensation plan. Such contributions, if any, are made on an annual basis after the Committee assesses the performance of each of the named executive officers and the Company during the most recently completed fiscal year. The contributions charged to salary expense were $0, $158,000 $141,000 and $135,000$141,000 for the years ended December 31,2020,2019 2018 and 2017,2018, respectively.

Incentive Arrangements

The Company maintains a cash incentive compensation plan for officers based on the Company's performance and individual officer goals. The total amount charged to salary expense for this plan was $1,214,000, $1,217,000 $1,643,000, and $1,108,000$1,643,000 for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, respectively.

91


Note 22 – Fair Value Measurements

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the fair value measurements and disclosures topic of FASB ASC 825,Financial Instruments, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1

Level 1 –

Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2

Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.

Level 3

Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Securities available for sale and equity securities: Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1)1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2)2).

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value. These loans currently consist of residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded in current period earnings as a component of mortgage banking income on the Company's consolidated statements of income.

Derivative asset (liability) - cash flow hedges: Cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Cash flow hedges are valued by a third party using significant assumptions that are observable in the market and can be corroborated by market data. All of the Company's cash flow hedges are classified as Level 2.

92


The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period (dollars in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Description2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Securities available for sale:       
U.S. Treasury$14,987
 $
 $14,987
 $
Federal agencies and GSEs128,114
 
 128,114
 
Mortgage-backed and CMOs184,240
 
 184,240
 
State and municipal42,154
 
 42,154
 
Corporate9,700
 
 9,700
 
Total securities available for sale$379,195
 $
 $379,195
 $
Liabilities:       
Derivative - cash flow hedges$2,658
 $
 $2,658
 $
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Securities available for sale:       
Federal agencies and GSEs$134,039
 $
 $134,039
 $
Mortgage-backed and CMOs111,867
 
 111,867
 
State and municipal79,902
 
 79,902
 
Corporate6,845
 
 6,845
 
Total securities available for sale$332,653
 $
 $332,653
 $
Equity securities$1,830
 $
 $1,830
 $
Liabilities:       
Derivative - cash flow hedges$804
 $
 $804
 $

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2020

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $34,998  $0  $34,998  $0 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  106,023   0   106,023   0 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  252,782   0   252,782   0 

State and municipal

  59,099   0   59,099   0 

Corporate

  13,189   0   13,189   0 

Total securities available for sale

 $466,091  $0  $466,091  $0 
Loans held for sale $15,591  $0  $15,591  $0 

Liabilities:

                

Derivative - cash flow hedges

 $4,868  $0  $4,868  $0 

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2019

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $14,987  $0  $14,987  $0 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  128,114   0   128,114   0 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  184,240   0   184,240   0 

State and municipal

  42,154   0   42,154   0 

Corporate

  9,700   0   9,700   0 

Total securities available for sale

 $379,195  $0  $379,195  $0 
Loans held for sale $2,027  $0  $2,027  $0 

Liabilities:

                

Derivative - cash flow hedges

 $2,658  $0  $2,658  $0 

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, the Company records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. No nonrecurring fair value adjustments were recorded on loans held for sale during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded within mortgage banking income on the consolidated statements of income.

Impaired loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements will not be collected when due. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the Company's collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing a market valuation approach based on an appraisal, of one year or less, conducted by an independent,


licensed appraiser using observable market data (Level 2)2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the property is more than one year old and not solely based on observable market comparables or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, then a Level 3 valuation is considered to measure the fair value. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal, of one year or less, if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business's financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3)3). Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the consolidated statements of income.

93

Other real estate owned:  Measurement for fair values for other real estate owned are the same as impaired loans. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as a valuation allowance against OREO with the associated expense included in OREO expense, net on the consolidated statements of income.

The following table summarizes the Company's assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period (dollars in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Loans held for sale$2,027
 $
 $2,027
 $
Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance759
 
 
 759
Other real estate owned, net1,308
 
 
 1,308
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Loans held for sale$640
 $
 $640
 $
Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance171
 
 
 171
Other real estate owned, net869
 
 
 869

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2020

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance

 $268  $0  $0  $268 

Other real estate owned, net

  958   0   0   958 

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2019

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance

 $759  $0  $0  $759 

Other real estate owned, net

  1,308   0   0   1,308 

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018:

2019:

Assets

Valuation Technique

Assets

Unobservable Input

 Valuation TechniqueUnobservable Input
Rate

Range; Weighted Average (1)

     

Impaired loans

Discounted appraised value

Selling cost

 Discounted appraised value8.00%
 Selling cost8.00%
Impaired loans

Discounted cash flow analysis

Market rate for borrower (discount rate)

 3.25%4.13% - 9.80%
7.20%; 5.19%

Other real estate owned

Discounted appraised value

Selling cost

 Discounted appraised valueSelling cost8.00%
8.00%

__________________________

(1) Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the impaired loans.

FASB ASC 825,Financial Instruments, requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not required to be measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. ASC 825 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company. Additionally, in accordance with ASU 2016-01,2016-01, which the Company adopted January 1, 2018 on a prospective basis, the Company uses the exit price notion, rather than the entry price notion, in calculating the fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

94


The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 20192020 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
 Carrying Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs 
Fair Value
Balance
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Financial Assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$79,582
 $79,582
 $
 $
 $79,582
Securities available for sale379,195
 
 379,195
 
 379,195
Restricted stock8,630
 
 8,630
 
 8,630
Loans held for sale2,027
 
 2,027
 
 2,027
Loans, net of allowance1,817,663
 
 
 1,818,655
 1,818,655
Bank owned life insurance27,817
 
 27,817
 
 27,817
Accrued interest receivable6,625
 
 6,625
 
 6,625
          
Financial Liabilities: 
  
  
  
  
Deposits$2,060,547
 $
 $2,062,823
 $
 $2,062,823
Repurchase agreements40,475
 
 40,475
 
 40,475
Subordinated debt7,517
 
 8,525
 
 8,525
Junior subordinated debt28,029
 
 
 22,697
 22,697
Accrued interest payable1,213
 
 1,213
 
 1,213
Derivative - cash flow hedges2,658
 
 2,658
 
 2,658

  

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Significant Other Observable Inputs  Significant Unobservable Inputs  

Fair Value

 
  

Carrying Value

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

  

Balance

 

Financial Assets:

                    
Cash and cash equivalents $374,370  $374,370  $0  $0  $374,370 

Securities available for sale

  466,091   0   466,091   0   466,091 

Restricted stock

  8,715   0   8,715   0   8,715 

Loans held for sale

  15,591   0   15,591   0   15,591 

Loans, net of allowance

  1,993,653   0   0   1,992,326   1,992,326 

Bank owned life insurance

  28,482   0   28,482   0   28,482 

Accrued interest receivable

  7,193   0   7,193   0   7,193 
                     

Financial Liabilities:

                    

Deposits

 $2,611,330  $0  $2,615,157  $0  $2,615,157 

Repurchase agreements

  42,551   0   42,551   0   42,551 

Subordinated debt

  7,500   0   7,522   0   7,522 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,130   0   0   21,696   21,696 

Accrued interest payable

  778   0   778   0   778 

Derivative - cash flow hedges

  4,868   0   4,868   0   4,868 

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 20182019 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets

  

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

  

Significant

Unobservable Inputs

  

Fair Value

 
  

Carrying Value

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

  

Balance

 

Financial Assets:

                    
Cash and cash equivalents $79,582  $79,582  $0  $0  $79,582 

Securities available for sale

  379,195   0   379,195   0   379,195 

Restricted stock

  8,630   0   8,630   0   8,630 

Loans held for sale

  2,027   0   2,027   0   2,027 

Loans, net of allowance

  1,817,663   0   0   1,818,655   1,818,655 

Bank owned life insurance

  27,817   0   27,817   0   27,817 

Accrued interest receivable

  6,625   0   6,625   0   6,625 
                     

Financial Liabilities:

                    

Deposits

 $2,060,547  $0  $2,062,823  $0  $2,062,823 

Repurchase agreements

  40,475   0   40,475   0   40,475 

Subordinated debt

  7,517   0   8,525   0   8,525 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,029   0   0   22,697   22,697 

Accrued interest payable

  1,213   0   1,213   0   1,213 

Derivative - cash flow hedges

  2,658   0   2,658   0   2,658 

95

 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using
 Carrying Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs 
Fair Value
Balance
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Financial Assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$64,255
 $64,255
 $
 $
 $64,255
Equity securities1,830
 
 1,830
 
 1,830
Securities available for sale332,653
 
 332,653
 
 332,653
Restricted stock5,247
 
 5,247
 
 5,247
Loans held for sale640
 
 640
 
 640
Loans, net of allowance1,344,671
 
 
 1,334,236
 1,334,236
Bank owned life insurance18,941
 
 18,941
 
 18,941
Accrued interest receivable5,449
 
 5,449
 
 5,449
          
Financial Liabilities: 
  
  
  
  
Deposits$1,566,227
 $
 $1,570,721
 $
 $1,570,721
Repurchase agreements35,243
 
 35,243
 
 35,243
Junior subordinated debt27,927
 
 
 22,577
 22,577
Accrued interest payable795
 
 795
 
 795
Derivative - cash flow hedges804
 
 804
 
 804


Note 23 – Dividend Restrictions and Regulatory Capital

The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the bank's retained net income, as defined, for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two calendar years. Under this formula, the Bank can distribute as dividends to the Company, without the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, up to $21,768,000$18,628,000 as of December 31, 2019.2020. Dividends paid by the Bank to the Company are the only significant source of funding for dividends paid by the Company to its shareholders.

Federal bank regulators have issued substantially similar guidelines requiring banks and bank holding companies to maintain capital at certain levels. In addition, regulators may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can trigger certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the Company’sCompany's financial condition and results of operations.

The Federal ReserveFRB and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have adopted rules to implement the Basel III capital framework as outlined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Basel III Capital Rules"). The Basel III Capital Rules require banks and bank holding companies to comply with certain minimum capital ratios, plus a "capital conservation buffer," as set forth in the table below. The capital conservation buffer requirement was phased in beginning on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, and increased by the same amount each year until it was fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and is applicable to all ratios except the leverage capital ratio.

The Company meets the eligibility criteria of a small bank holding company in accordance with the Federal Reserve’sFRB's Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (the "SBHC Policy Statement"). Under the SBHC Policy Statement, qualifying bank holding companies, such as the Company, have additional flexibility in the amount of debt they can issue and are also exempt from the Basel III Capital Rules. However, the Company does not currently intend to issue a material amount of debt or take any other action that would cause its capital ratios to fall below the minimum ratios required by the Basel III Capital Rules. The SBHC Policy Statement does not apply to the Bank, and the Bank must comply with the Basel III Capital Rules. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. The minimum capital ratios for the Bank to be considered "well capitalized" are set forth in the table below.

Management believes that as of December 31, 2019,2020, the Company and Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. At year-end 20192020 and 2018,2019, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's category.

On September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 that permits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to be subject to a 9% leverage ratio (commonly referred to as the community bank leverage ratio or "CBLR"). Under the final rule, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of greater than 9% are not subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules and are deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a community bank that falls out of compliance with the framework has a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, provided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the grace period. The CBLR framework was first available for banking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. 

On April 6, 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies announced the issuance of two interim final rules that make changes to the CBLR framework and implement Section 4012 of the CARES Act. One interim final rule provides that, as of the second quarter of 2020, a banking organization with a leverage ratio of 8% or greater (and that meets the other existing qualifying criteria) could elect to use the CBLR framework. This rule also establishes a two-quarter grace period for a qualifying community banking organization whose leverage ratio fell below 8% so long as the banking organization maintained a leverage ratio of 7% or greater. The second interim final rule provides a transition back to the leverage ratio requirement of 9%. Under this rule, the required leverage ratio was 8% beginning in the second quarter and for the remainder of calendar year 2020 and will be 8.5% for calendar year 2021 and 9% thereafter. This rule also maintains a two-quarter grace period for a qualifying community banking organization whose leverage ratio falls no more than 1% below the applicable ratio. This transition will allow community banking organizations to focus on supporting lending to creditworthy households and businesses given the recent strains on the U.S. economy caused by COVID-19. The Company and the Bank do not currently expect to opt into the CBLR framework.

96


Actual and required capital amounts (in thousands) and ratios are presented below at year-end:

                  

To Be Well

 
                  

Capitalized Under

 
                  

Prompt Corrective

 
  

Actual

  

Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes

  

Action Provisions

 
  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

 

December 31, 2020

                        

Common Equity Tier 1

                        
Company $244,318   12.36% $88,967   >4.50%   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  252,748   12.86   137,530   >7.00  $127,706   >6.50% 
                         

Tier 1 Capital

                        
Company  272,448   13.78   118,623   >6.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  252,748   12.86   167,001   >8.50   157,177   >8.00 
                         

Total Capital

                        
Company  300,155   15.18   158,164   >8.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  274,455   13.97   206,295   >10.50   196,471   >10.00 
                         

Leverage Capital

                        
Company  272,448   9.48   114,902   >4.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  252,748   8.85   114,247   >4.00   142,809   >5.00 
                         

December 31, 2019

                        

Common Equity Tier 1

                        
Company $228,554   11.56% $88,968   >4.50%   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  243,449   12.38   137,698   >7.00  $127,862   >6.50% 
                         

Tier 1 Capital

                        
Company  256,583   12.98   118,624   >6.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  243,449   12.38   167,205   >8.50   157,369   >8.00 
                         

Total Capital

                        
Company  277,581   14.04   158,166   >8.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  256,930   13.06   206,547   >10.50   196,712   >10.00 
                         

Leverage Capital

                        
Company  256,583   10.75   95,514   >4.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  243,449   10.25   94,972   >4.00   118,715   >5.00 

 Actual Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes* To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount
 Ratio
December 31, 2019           
Common Equity Tier 1           
Company$228,554
 11.56% $88,968
 >7.00%    
Bank243,449
 12.38
 137,698
 >7.00
 $127,862
 >6.50%
            
Tier 1 Capital           
Company256,583
 12.98
 118,624
 >8.50
    
Bank243,449
 12.38
 167,205
 >8.50
 157,369
 >8.00
            
Total Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company277,581
 14.04
 158,166
 >10.50
    
Bank256,930
 13.06
 206,547
 >10.50
 196,712
 >10.00
            
Leverage Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company256,583
 10.75
 95,514
 >4.00
    
Bank243,449
 10.25
 94,972
 >4.00
 118,715
 >5.00
            
December 31, 2018 
  
  
    
  
Common Equity Tier 1           
Company$183,579
 12.55% $65,843
 >6.375%    
Bank198,991
 13.68
 92,740
 >6.375
 $94,559
 >6.50%
            
Tier 1 Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company211,506
 14.46
 87,791
 >7.875
    
Bank198,991
 13.68
 114,561
 >7.875
 116,380
 >8.00
            
Total Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company224,528
 15.35
 117,054
 >9.875
    
Bank212,013
 14.57
 143,656
 >9.875
 145,475
 >10.00
            
Leverage Capital           
Company211,506
 11.62
 72,817
 >4.00
    
Bank198,991
 10.99
 72,422
 >4.00
 90,528
 >5.00
______________________
*Except with regard to the Company's and the Bank's leverage capital ratio, includes the phased-in portion of the Basel III Capital Rule's capital conservation buffer.

Note 24 – Segment and Related Information

The Company has two reportable segments, community banking and trust and investment services.

Community banking involves making loans to and generating deposits from individuals and businesses. All assets and liabilities of the Company are allocated to community banking. Investment income from securities is also allocated to the community banking segment. Loan fee income, service charges from deposit accounts, and non-deposit fees such as automated teller machine fees and insurance commissions generate additional income for the community banking segment.

Trust and investment services include estate planning, trust account administration, investment management, and retail brokerage. Investment management services include purchasing equity, fixed income, and mutual fund investments for customer accounts. The trust and investment services segment receives fees for investment and administrative services.

97


Segment information as of and for the years ended December 31,2020,2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, is shown in the following table (dollars in thousands):

  

2020

 
  

Community Banking

  

Trust and Investment Services

  

Total

 

Interest income

 $95,840  $0  $95,840 

Interest expense

  12,020   0   12,020 

Noninterest income

  12,054   4,789   16,843 

Noninterest expense

  52,245   2,320   54,565 

Incomebefore income taxes

  34,714   2,468   37,182 

Net income

  28,052   1,993   30,045 

Depreciation and amortization

  3,815   10   3,825 

Total assets

  3,049,779   231   3,050,010 

Goodwill

  85,048   0   85,048 

Capital expenditures

  2,690   4   2,694 

  

2019

 
  

Community Banking

  

Trust and Investment Services

  

Total

 

Interest income

 $92,855  $0  $92,855 

Interest expense

  15,728   0   15,728 

Noninterest income

  10,602   4,568   15,170 

Noninterest expense

  63,794   2,280   66,074 

Incomebefore income taxes

  23,479   2,288   25,767 

Net income

  19,050   1,856   20,906 

Depreciation and amortization

  3,454   8   3,462 

Total assets

  2,478,478   72   2,478,550 

Goodwill

  84,002   0   84,002 

Capital expenditures

  3,534   21   3,555 

  

2018

 
  

Community Banking

  

Trust and Investment Services

  

Total

 

Interest income

 $68,768  $0  $68,768 

Interest expense

  9,674   0   9,674 

Noninterest income

  8,695   4,579   13,274 

Noninterest expense

  41,832   2,414   44,246 

Incomebefore income taxes

  26,060   2,165   28,225 

Net income

  20,848   1,731   22,579 

Depreciation and amortization

  2,030   10   2,040 

Total assets

  1,862,849   17   1,862,866 

Goodwill

  43,872   0   43,872 

Capital expenditures

  2,723   0   2,723 

 2019
 
Community Banking
 
Trust and Investment Services
 Other 
Intersegment Eliminations
 Total
Interest income$92,404
 $
 $451
 $
 $92,855
Interest expense13,803
 
 1,925
 
 15,728
Noninterest income10,230
 4,568
 372
 
 15,170
Income (loss) before income taxes26,888
 2,288
 (3,409) 
 25,767
Net income (loss)21,858
 1,856
 (2,808) 
 20,906
Depreciation and amortization3,454
 8
 
 
 3,462
Total assets2,464,860
 
 358,601
 (344,911) 2,478,550
Goodwill84,002
 
 
 
 84,002
Capital expenditures3,534
 21
 
 
 3,555
 2018
 
Community Banking
 
Trust and Investment Services
 Other 
Intersegment Eliminations
 Total
Interest income$68,388
 $
 $380
 $
 $68,768
Interest expense8,272
 
 1,402
 
 9,674
Noninterest income8,619
 4,579
 76
 
 13,274
Income (loss) before income taxes28,000
 2,165
 (1,940) 
 28,225
Net income (loss)22,381
 1,731
 (1,533) 
 22,579
Depreciation and amortization2,030
 10
 
 
 2,040
Total assets1,853,057
 
 251,434
 (241,625) 1,862,866
Goodwill43,872
 
 
 
 43,872
Capital expenditures2,723
 
 
 
 2,723
 2017
 
Community Banking
 
Trust and Investment Services
 Other 
Intersegment Eliminations
 Total
Interest income$62,697
 $
 $341
 $
 $63,038
Interest expense6,263
 
 1,028
 
 7,291
Noninterest income9,224
 4,756
 247
 
 14,227
Income (loss) before income taxes24,828
 2,521
 (1,274) 
 26,075
Net income (loss)14,456
 1,486
 (693) 
 15,249
Depreciation and amortization2,393
 12
 
 
 2,405
Total assets1,806,647
 
 236,644
 (227,213) 1,816,078
Goodwill43,872
 
 
 
 43,872
Capital expenditures2,637
 11
 
 
 2,648
98


Note 25 – Parent Company Financial Information

Condensed Parent Company financial information is as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31,

 

Condensed Balance Sheets

 

2020

  

2019

 

Cash

 $17,759  $11,127 

Securities available for sale, at fair value

  8,534   8,683 

Investment in subsidiaries

  351,033   337,983 

Due from subsidiaries

  143   134 

Other assets

  1,062   674 

Total Assets

 $378,531  $358,601 
         

Subordinated debt

 $7,500  $7,517 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,130   28,029 

Other liabilities

  5,007   2,797 

Shareholders' equity

  337,894   320,258 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 $378,531  $358,601 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Condensed Statements of Income

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Dividends from subsidiary

 $25,500  $25,000  $11,000 

Other income

  512   823   456 

Expenses

  3,369   4,232   2,396 

Income tax benefit

  (600)  (601)  (407)

Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary

  23,243   22,192   9,467 

Equity in undistributed (distributed) earnings of subsidiary

  6,802   (1,286)  13,112 

Net Income

 $30,045  $20,906  $22,579 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

            

Net income

 $30,045  $20,906  $22,579 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

Equity in (undistributed) distributions of subsidiary

  (6,802)  1,286   (13,112)

Net change in other assets

  84   (382)  (194)

Net change in other liabilities

  85   (35)  136 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  23,412   21,775   9,409 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

            

Purchases of securities available for sale

  0   (2,220)  0 

Sales of equity securities

  0   445   431 

Cash paid in bank acquisition

  0   (27)  0 

Cash acquired in bank acquisition

  0   981   0 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  0   (821)  431 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

            

Common stock dividends paid

  (11,842)  (10,965)  (8,702)

Repurchase of common stock

  (4,981)  (3,146)  0 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  43   688   861 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (16,780)  (13,423)  (7,841)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  6,632   7,531   1,999 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  11,127   3,596   1,597 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $17,759  $11,127  $3,596 

 December 31,
Condensed Balance Sheets2019 2018
Cash$11,127
 $3,596
Equity securities, at fair value
 1,830
Securities available for sale, at fair value8,683
 6,361
Investment in subsidiaries337,983
 239,413
Due from subsidiaries134
 170
Other assets674
 64
Total Assets$358,601
 $251,434
    
Subordinated debt$7,517

$
Junior subordinated debt28,029
 27,927
Other liabilities2,797
 965
Shareholders' equity320,258
 222,542
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$358,601
 $251,434
 Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Income2019 2018 2017
Dividends from subsidiary$25,000
 $11,000
 $6,000
Other income823
 456
 588
Expenses4,232
 2,396
 1,862
Income tax benefit(601) (407) (581)
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary22,192
 9,467
 5,307
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary(1,286) 13,112
 9,942
Net Income$20,906
 $22,579
 $15,249
99


 Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net income$20,906
 $22,579
 $15,249
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Gain on sale of securities
 
 (221)
Equity in (undistributed) distributions of subsidiary1,286
 (13,112) (9,942)
Net change in other assets(382) (194) 83
Net change in other liabilities(35) 136
 (82)
Net cash provided by operating activities21,775
 9,409
 5,087
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:     
Purchases of securities available for sale(2,220) 
 (373)
Sales of equity securities445
 431
 
Sales of securities available for sale
 
 500
Cash paid in bank acquisition(27) 
 
Cash acquired in bank acquisition981
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(821) 431
 127
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:     
Common stock dividends paid(10,965) (8,702) (8,384)
Repurchase of common stock(3,146) 
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options688
 861
 113
Net cash used in financing activities(13,423) (7,841) (8,271)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents7,531
 1,999
 (3,057)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period3,596
 1,597
 4,654
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$11,127
 $3,596
 $1,597

Note 26 – Concentrations of Credit Risk

Substantially all of the Company's loans are made within its market area, which includes Southern and Central Virginia and the northern portion of Central North Carolina. The ultimate collectibility of the Company's loan portfolio and the ability to realize the value of any underlying collateral, if necessary, are impacted by the economic conditions and real estate values of the market area.

Loans secured by real estate were $1,515,338,000, or 75.2% of the loan portfolio at December 31,2020, and $1,480,857,000, or 80.9% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2019, and $1,066,411,000, or 78.6% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2018.2019. Loans secured by commercial real estate represented the largest portion of loans at $1,001,249,000 at December 31,2020 and $899,199,000 at December 31,2019, 49.7% and $655,800,000 at December 31, 2018, 49.1% and 48.3%, respectively, of total loans. There were no concentrations of loans to any individual, group of individuals, business, or industry that exceeded 10% of total loans at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019.



Note 27 – Supplemental Cash Flow Information

(dollars in thousands)

 

As of or for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Supplemental Schedule of Cash and Cash Equivalents:

            

Cash and due from banks

 $30,767  $32,505  $29,587 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

  343,603   47,077   34,668 
  $374,370  $79,582  $64,255 
             

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

            

Cash paid for:

            

Interest on deposits and borrowed funds

 $12,455  $15,310  $9,553 

Income taxes

  7,609   4,698   5,056 

Noncash investing and financing activities:

            

Transfer of loans to other real estate owned

  95   234   599 
Transfer of loans to repossessions  411   0   0 

Transfer from premises and equipment to other assets

  0   445   0 

Increase in operating lease right-of-use asset

  371   4,453   0 

Increase in operating lease liability

  371   4,453   0 

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale

  6,399   8,821   (3,290)

Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

  (2,210)  (1,854)  (804)

Change in unfunded pension liability

  (413)  (64)  1,291 
             

Non-cash transactions related to acquisitions:

            
             

Assets acquired:

            

Investment securities

  0   34,876   0 

Restricted stock

  0   2,588   0 

Loans

  0   444,324   0 

Premises and equipment

  0   12,554   0 

Deferred income taxes

  0   2,960   0 

Core deposit intangible

  0   8,200   0 

Other real estate owned

  0   1,442   0 

Bank owned life insurance

  0   8,246   0 

Other assets

  0   14,244   0 
             

Liabilities assumed:

            

Deposits

  0   483,626   0 

Short-term FHLB advances

  0   14,883   0 

Long-term FHLB advances

  0   778   0 

Subordinated debt

  0   7,530   0 

Other liabilities

  0   5,780   0 
             

Consideration:

            

Issuance of common stock

  0   82,470   0 

Fair value of replacement stock options/restricted stock

  0   753   0 

100

(dollars in thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Supplemental Schedule of Cash and Cash Equivalents:     
    Cash and due from banks$32,505
 $29,587
 $28,594
  Interest-bearing deposits in other banks47,077
 34,668
 23,883
 $79,582
 $64,255
 $52,477
      
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: 
  
  
    Cash paid for: 
  
  
        Interest on deposits and borrowed funds$15,310
 $9,553
 $7,240
        Income taxes4,698
 5,056
 7,653
    Noncash investing and financing activities: 
  
  
        Transfer of loans to other real estate owned234
 599
 1,233
        Transfer from premises and equipment to other assets445
 
 
        Increase in operating lease right-of-use asset4,453
 
 
        Increase in operating lease liability4,453
 
 
        Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale8,821
 (3,290) (777)
        Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges(1,854) (804) 
        Change in unfunded pension liability(64) 1,291
 (234)
      
Non-cash transactions related to acquisitions:     
      
Assets acquired:     
    Investment securities34,876
 
 
    Restricted stock2,588
 
 
    Loans444,324
 
 
    Premises and equipment12,554
 
 
    Deferred income taxes2,960
 
 
    Core deposit intangible8,200
 
 
    Other real estate owned1,442
 
 
    Bank owned life insurance8,246
 
 
    Other assets14,244
 
 
      
Liabilities assumed:     
    Deposits483,626
 
 
    Short-term FHLB advances14,883
 
 
    Long-term FHLB advances778
 
 
    Subordinated debt7,530
 
 
    Other liabilities5,780
 
 
      
Consideration:     
    Issuance of common stock82,470
 
 
    Fair value of replacement stock options/restricted stock753
 
 


Note 28 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (dollars in thousands):

      

Unrealized

  

Adjustments

  

Accumulated

 
  

Net Unrealized

  

Losses on

  

Related to

  

Other

 
  

Gains (Losses)

  

Cash Flow

  

Pension

  

Comprehensive

 
  

on Securities

  

Hedges

  

Benefits

  

Income (Loss)

 

Balance at Balance at December 31, 2017

 $(796) $0  $(2,280) $(3,076)

Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, $(745)

  (2,464)  0   0   (2,464)

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(18)

  (63)  0   0   (63)

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(180)

  0   (624)  0   (624)

Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $249

  0   0   1,042   1,042 

Reclassification for ASU 2016-01 adoption

  (650)  0   0   (650)

Balance at December 31, 2018

  (3,973)  (624)  (1,238)  (5,835)

Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $2,005

  7,090   0   0   7,090 

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(59)

  (215)  0   0   (215)

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(394)

  0   (1,460)  0   (1,460)

Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(1)

  0   0   (63)  (63)

Balance at December 31, 2019

  2,902   (2,084)  (1,301)  (483)

Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $1,557

  5,656   0   0   5,656 

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(176)

  (638)  0   0   (638)

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(448)

  0   (1,762)  0   (1,762)

Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(77)

  0   0   (336)  (336)

Balance at December 31, 2020

  7,920   (3,846)  (1,637) $2,437 

 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Securities
 Unrealized Losses on Cash Flow Hedges 
Adjustments
Related to
Pension
Benefits
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at Balance at December 31, 2016$(150) $
 $(1,724) $(1,874)
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $1223
 
 
 23
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(284)(528) 
 
 (528)
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(82)
 
 (152) (152)
Reclassification of "stranded" tax effects from tax rate change(141) 
 (404) (545)
        
Balance at December 31, 2017(796) 
 (2,280) (3,076)
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, $(745)(2,464) 
 
 (2,464)
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(18)(63) 
 
 (63)
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(180)
 (624) 
 (624)
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $249
 
 1,042
 1,042
Reclassification for ASU 2016-01 adoption(650) 
 
 (650)
        
Balance at December 31, 2018(3,973) (624) (1,238) (5,835)
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $2,0057,090
 
 
 7,090
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(59)(215) 
 
 (215)
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(394)
 (1,460) 
 (1,460)
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(1)
 
 (63) (63)
        
Balance at December 31, 2019$2,902
 $(2,084) $(1,301) $(483)

The following table provides information regarding reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (dollars in thousands):

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Three Years Ending December 31, 2019

Details about AOCI ComponentsAmount Reclassified from AOCI 
Affected Line Item in the Statement of Where Net Income is Presented
 Years Ended December 31,  
 2019 2018 2017  
Available for sale securities:       
Realized gain on sale of securities$274
 $81
 $812
 Securities gains, net
 (59) (18) (284) Income taxes
 $215
 $63
 $528
 Net of tax
        
Reclassification of "stranded" tax effects from tax rate change
 
 141
 
(1) 
        
Reclassification for ASU-2016-01 adoption
 650
 
 
(2) 
        
Employee benefit plans:       
Reclassification of "stranded" tax effects from tax rate change
 
 404
 
(1) 
        
Total reclassifications$215
 $713
 $1,073
  
2020

Details about AOCI Components

 

Amount Reclassified from AOCI

 

Affected Line Item in the Statement of Where Net Income is Presented

  

Year Ended December 31,

  
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

Available for sale securities:

             

Realized gain on sale of securities

 $814  $274  $81 

Securities gains, net

   (176)  (59)  (18)

Income taxes

  $638  $215  $63 

Net of tax

Reclassification for ASU-2016-01 adoption

  0   0   650 

(1)

Total reclassifications

 $638  $215  $713  

______________________

(1) Reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for "stranded" tax effects resulting from the impact of the newly enacted federal corporate income tax rate on items included in AOCI.
(2)

(1) Reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for unrealized holding gains on equity securities due to adoption of ASU 2016-01.2016-01.

101

ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2019.2020. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20192020 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management regularly monitors its internal control over financial reporting, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on this evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.


The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Yount, Hyde and Barbour, P.C., has audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, as stated in their report included herein. Yount, Hyde and Barbour, P.C. also audited the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

2020.

/s/ Jeffrey V. Haley

Jeffrey V. Haley

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar

Jeffrey W. Farrar

Executive Vice President,

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 9, 20208, 2021

102

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)

(a)(1)

Financial Statements.  See Item 8 for reference.

(a)(2)

Financial Statement Schedules.  All applicable financial statement schedules required under Regulation S-X have been included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(3)

Exhibits.  The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed below.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

Location

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

2.1

DescriptionLocation
2.1

Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2018

3.1

Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10-Q8-K filed July 5, 2011

3.2

Exhibit 3.2 on Form 8-K filed April 4, 2019May 21, 2020

4.1

Filed herewith

10.1

Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2009

10.2

Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2015

10.3

Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2019

10.4

Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2015
10.5

Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-Q filed May 11, 2015

   
10.5Amendment to Employment Agreement between American National Bankshares Inc. and H. Gregg Strader, dated January 21, 2021Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed January 26, 2021

10.6Exhibit 10.9 on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed March 29, 2011

Filed herewith

10.7

Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2016
10.8

Exhibit 10.10 on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed March 29, 2011Filed herewith
   
10.910.8Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2016

10.9

Employment Agreement between American National Bank and Trust Company and John H. Settle, Jr. dated February 8, 2017

Exhibit 10.8 on Form 10-K filed March 8, 2019


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

Location

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

10.10

DescriptionLocation
10.10

Exhibit 10.1 on Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S‑4S-4 filed February 6, 2019

10.11

Appendix A of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 22, 2008, filed on March 14, 2008

10.12

Appendix A of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 15, 2018, filed on April 12, 2018

10.13

Exhibit 4.0 on Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 filed April 1, 2019

10.14

Exhibit 10.11 on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2016

21.1

Filed herewith

23.1

Filed herewith

31.1

Filed herewith

31.2

Filed herewith

32.1

Filed herewith

32.2

Filed herewith

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

SBRLInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104The cover page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,  2020, formatted in Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (included with Exhibit 101).

ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY

The registrant has not selected the option to provide the summary information of the Form 10-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 9, 20208, 2021

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC.

By:

By:

/s/  Jeffrey V. Haley

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 9, 2020.

8, 2021.

/s/  Jeffrey V. Haley

Director, President and

Jeffrey V. Haley

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

/s/  Charles H. Majors

Director and Chairman

Charles H. Majors

/s/  Nancy H. Agee

Director

/s/  John H. Love

Director

Nancy H. Agee

John H. Love

/s/  Kenneth S. Bowling

Director

/s/  Ronda M. Penn

Director

Kenneth S. Bowling

Ronda M. Penn

/s/  Tammy M. Finley

Director

/s/  Dan M. Pleasant

Director

Tammy M. Finley

Dan M. Pleasant

/s/  Michael P. Haley

Director

/s/  Joel R. Shepherd

Director

Michael P. Haley

Joel R. Shepherd

/s/  Charles S. Harris

Director

/s/  Susan K. Still

Director

Charles S. Harris

Susan K. Still

/s/  F. D. Hornaday, III

Director

   
Jeffrey V. Haley
/s/  Charles H. MajorsDirector and Chairman
Charles H. Majors
/s/  Nancy H. AgeeDirector/s/  

F. D. Hornaday, III

Director

Nancy H. Agee

F. D. Hornaday, III

/s/  Fred A. BlairDirector/s/  John H. LoveDirector
Fred A. BlairJohn H. Love
/s/  Kenneth S. BowlingDirector/s/  Claude B. Owen, Jr.Director
Kenneth S. BowlingClaude B. Owen, Jr.
/s/  Frank C. Crist, Jr.Director/s/  Ronda M. PennDirector
Frank C. Crist, Jr.Ronda M. Penn
/s/  Tammy M. FinleyDirector/s/  Dan M. PleasantDirector
Tammy M. FinleyDan M. Pleasant
/s/  Michael P. HaleyDirector/s/  Joel R. ShepherdDirector
Michael P. HaleyJoel R. Shepherd
/s/  Charles S. HarrisDirector/s/  Susan K. StillDirector
Charles S. HarrisSusan K. Still

/s/ Cathy W. Liles

Senior Vice President and

/s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar

Executive Vice President,

Cathy W. Liles

Chief Accounting Officer

(principal accounting officer)

/s/

Jeffrey W. Farrar

Executive Vice President,

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

Cathy W. LilesJeffrey W. Farrar

112
105