UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
|
| |
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended January 31, 20152017
or
|
| |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-14338
_____________________________________________________________
AUTODESK, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
| | |
| Delaware | | 94-2819853 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. employer Identification No.) |
| | | |
111 McInnis Parkway, San Rafael, California | | 94903 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 507-5000
_____________________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
| Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value | | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select Market) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
_____________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. |
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of July 31, 2014,2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were approximately 226.6208.4 million shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding that were held by non-affiliates, and the aggregate market value of such shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based on the closing sale price of such shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 31, 2014)2016) was approximately $12.1$12.4 billion. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer and director have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of February 28, 2015,March 10, 2017, the registrant had outstanding 227,204,316220,849,268 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. The Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended January 31, 20152017.
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
AUTODESK, INC. FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | | Page |
| | |
| | | |
| Item 1. | | |
| | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| Item 5. | | |
| | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| Item 10. | | |
| | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| Item 15. | | |
| | |
| Item 16. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The discussion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains trend analyses and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are any statements that look to future events and consist of, among other things, our business strategies, anticipated future financial results (including by product type and geography) and subscriptions, the effectiveness of our efforts to successfully manage transitions to new business models and markets, our expectations regarding the continued transition of our business model, revenue from our channel partners and changes in mix of channel partners, our ability to increase our subscription base, expected market trends, including the growth of cloud mobile and socialmobile computing, the effect of unemployment, andthe availability of credit, our expectations for our restructuring, the effects of weakmixed global economic conditions, the effects of revenue recognition, our backlog, expected trends in certain financial metrics, including expenses, and the predictability and ratability of our revenue over time, the impact of acquisitions and investment activities, expectations regarding our cash needs, the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates and our hedging activities on our financial results, our ability to successfully expand adoption of our products, our ability to gain market acceptance of new businesses and sales initiatives, our ability to successfully increase sales of product suites as part of our overall sales strategy, and the impact of economic volatility and geopolitical activities in certain countries, particularly emerging economy countries, the timing and amount of purchases under our newly announced stock buy-back plan, and the effects of potential non-cash charges on our financial results and the resulting effect on our financial results. In addition, forward-looking statements also consist of statements involving expectations regarding product capability and acceptance, continuation ofremediation to our stock repurchase program,controls environment, statements regarding our liquidity and short-term and long-term cash requirements, as well as statements involving trend analyses and statements including such words as “may,” “believe,” “could,” “anticipate,” “would,” “might,” “plan,” “expect,” and similar expressions or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are subject to business and economic risks. As such, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth below in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and in our other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made, except as required by law.
PART I
Note: A glossary of terms used in this Form 10-K appears at the end of this Item 1.
GENERAL
We are a global leader in design software and services, offering customers productive business solutions through powerful technology products and services. We serve customers in the architecture, engineering and construction; product design and manufacturing; and digital media consumer, and entertainment industries. Our sophisticated software products enable our customers to experience their ideas before they are real. Customers are able to imagine, design and create their ideasbetter things and processes by visualizing, simulating and analyzing real-world performance early in the design process by creating and manipulating digital prototypes.process. These capabilities allow our customers to foster innovation, optimize and improve their designs, save time and money, improve quality, communicate intentions,plans, and collaborate with others. Our professional software products are sold globally, both directly to customers and through a network of resellers and distributors. Additionally, we sell a line of consumer products for digital art, personal design and creativity, and home design. These products are sold over the Internet and in various digital storefronts, including the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store.
Segments
We report segment information based on the “management” approach. The management approach designates the internal reporting used by management for making decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance as the source of our reportable segments. Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we had four reportable operating segments:
Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (“AEC”), which accounted for 35% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015;
Manufacturing (“MFG”), Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (“PSEB”), which accounted for 32% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015;
Manufacturing (“MFG”), which accounted for 27% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015; and
Media and Entertainment (“M&E”), which accounted for 6%.
As a result of our net revenuebusiness model transition, there have been a number of changes in the business including the shift from selling perpetual licenses to subscription-based offerings and organizational changes in how the business is managed including a restructuring announced in the first quarter of fiscal 20152017. In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, these organizational changes resulted in a change in the internal reporting provided to our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). These internal reports are used by the CODM to assess the performance of the business on a consolidated basis. Accordingly, our CODM now allocates resources and assesses the operating performance of Autodesk as a whole. As such, beginning in the third quarter of
fiscal 2017, we concluded that we had one segment manager (the CODM), one operating segment, and one reporting unit for goodwill impairment purposes.
A summary of our net revenue by geographic area and results of operations for our business segmentsproduct family is found in Note 13,, “Segments, “Segments,” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our AEC, PSEB, and MFG segments derive revenue from the sale of licenses and subscriptions for software products and services to customers who design, build, and own buildings, infrastructures, and manufactured products. In addition to software products, the AEC, PSEB, and MFG segments offer a range of services, including consulting, support, and training, largely dedicated to enhancing our ability to sell licenses and subscriptions to our software products. Our M&E segment derives revenue from the sale of licenses and subscriptions for software products to creative professionals, post-production facilities, and broadcasters for a variety of applications, including feature films, television programs, commercials, music and corporate videos, interactive game production, web design, and interactive web streaming. In addition, our animation products produced by our M&E segment are often used by customers of products from our other segments for the visualization of their designs.
The principal products and services of these segments include the following:
Flagship products, which accounted for approximately 48% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015, are our core standalone horizontal, vertical, and model-based design products including AutoCAD, AutoCAD LT, AutoCAD Mechanical, AutoCAD Civil 3D, AutoCAD Map, AutoCAD Architecture, 3ds Max, and Maya.
Suites, which accounted for approximately 36% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015, are a combination of products that target a specific user objective (product design, building design, etc.) and support a set of workflows for that objective, including Autodesk Building Design Suites, Autodesk Product Design Suites, Autodesk Infrastructure Design Suites, and AutoCAD Design Suites.
New and Adjacent products, which accounted for approximately 16% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015, are new product offerings as well as products that are not considered flagship or suites, including Moldflow, Alias Design, Autodesk Creative Finishing products, and Vault.
Corporate Information
We were incorporated in California in April 1982 and were reincorporated in Delaware in May 1994. Our principal executive office is located at 111 McInnis Parkway, San Rafael, California 94903, and the telephone number at that address is (415) 507-5000. Our internet address is www.autodesk.com. The information posted on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on the Investor Relations portion of our web site at www.autodesk.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The public may also read and copy any material we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330.
PRODUCTS
The principal product offerings from Autodesk’s different segments are as follows:
AEC
Our AEC softwarearchitecture, engineering and construction products help to improve the way building, civil infrastructure, process plant and construction projects are designed, built, and managed. A broadused. Our product development and manufacturing software provides manufacturers in automotive, transportation, industrial machinery, consumer products and building products with comprehensive digital engineering solutions that bring together data from all phases of the product development and production life cycle, creating a single digital model. Our digital media and entertainment products provide tools for digital sculpting, modeling, animation, effects, rendering, and compositing for design visualization, visual effects and games production. Our portfolio of solutionsproducts and services enables our customers to foster innovation, optimize and improve their designs, save time and money, improve quality, communicate plans, and collaborate with others.
Autodesk’s product offerings include:
AutoCAD
AutoCAD software, which is our largest single revenue-generating product, is a customizable and extensible CAD application for professional design, drafting, detailing, and visualization. AutoCAD software provides digital tools that can be used independently and in conjunction with other specific applications in fields ranging from construction and civil engineering to manufacturing and plant design.
AutoCAD LT
AutoCAD LT software is purpose built for professional drafting and detailing. AutoCAD LT includes document sharing capability without the need for software customization or certain advanced functionality found in AutoCAD. Users can share all design data with team members who use AutoCAD or other Autodesk products built on AutoCAD. AutoCAD LT software is our second largest revenue-generating product.
Industry Collections
Launched in August 2016, Autodesk's Industry Collections, our newest subscription offerings, provide our customers with increased access to a broader selection of Autodesk products, greater efficiency, accuracy,value, more flexibility, and sustainability acrossa simpler way to subscribe and manage Autodesk subscriptions. To make way for industry collections, we ended the entire project lifecycle. Oursale of the Design and Creation Suites on July 31, 2016, including Building Design Suites, Infrastructure Design Suites, and Product Design Suites. The collections are tailored to provide the essential software needed by professionals within each industry: AEC, solutions include advanced technology for building information modeling (“BIM”), AutoCAD-basedProduct Design, and M&E.
The AEC Collection aims to help our customers design, engineer, and documentation productivity software, sustainable design analysis applications, collaboration, and project management solutions. BIM, an integrated process forconstruct higher quality, more predictable building and civil infrastructure design, analysis, documentation,projects, commonly used by AEC industry experts, such as AutoCAD, AutoCAD Civil3D, and construction, uses consistent, coordinated information to improve communication and collaboration between the extended project team. AEC provides a comprehensive portfolio of BIM solutions that help customers deliver projects faster and more economically, while minimizing environmental impact. The segment’s principal product offerings included the following during fiscal 2015:Revit.
Autodesk BuildingThe Product Design SuitesCollection offers connected, professional-grade tools that help our customers make great products today and compete in the changing manufacturing landscape of the future. The collection offers access to a wide range of our products, including AutoCAD and Inventor.
Autodesk Building Design Suites ("BDS") give the power of BIM or CAD, withThe M&E Collection provides end-to-end creative tools for modeling, visualization,entertainment creation. This collection enables animators, modelers and documentation. With a comprehensive set of tools, BDS gives customersvisual effect artists to access the abilitytool they need, including Maya and 3ds Max, to manage all phases of designcreate compelling effects, 3D characters and construction. Three editions of BDS are available to meet each customer's particular business needs and offer the depth and breadth of the Autodesk portfolio.digital worlds.
Autodesk 3ds Max
3ds Max software provides 3D modeling, animation, and rendering solutions that enable game developers, design visualization professionals and visual effects artists to digitally create realistic images, animations, and complex scenes and to digitally communicate abstract or complex mechanical, architectural, engineering, and construction concepts.
Maya
Maya software provides 3D modeling, animation, effects, rendering and compositing solutions that enable film and video artists, game developers, and design visualization professionals to digitally create engaging, lifelike images, realistic animations and simulations, extraordinary visual effects, and full length animated feature films.
Revit
Purpose-builtRevit software is built for BIM,Building Information Modeling ("BIM") to help professionals design, build, and maintain higher-quality, more energy-efficient buildings. Using the Autodeskinformation-rich models created with Revit, products collect information about a building projectarchitects, engineers, and allow this informationconstruction firms can collaborate to be coordinated across all other representations ofmake better-informed decisions earlier in the project, so that every drawing sheet, 2D and 3D view and schedule is based on internally consistent and complete information from the same underlying building database. The Autodeskdesign process to deliver projects with greater efficiency. Revit products, including AutoCAD Revit Architecture Suite, AutoCAD Revit MEP Suite, and AutoCAD Revit Structure Suite, provide an intuitive, sophisticated, model-based design and documentation systemincludes features for architects;architectural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing ("MEP") engineers;design as well as structural engineers; design-build teams;engineering and other design andconstruction, providing a comprehensive solution for the entire building industry professionals.project team.
Autodesk Infrastructure Design SuitesInventor
The Infrastructure Design Suites areInventor enables manufacturers to go beyond 3D design to digital prototyping by giving engineers a comprehensive and flexible set of tools for 3D mechanical design, simulation, analysis, tooling, visualization, and documentation. Engineers can integrate AutoCAD drawings and model-based design data into a single digital model, creating a virtual representation of a final product that enables them to validate the BIM for Infrastructure design solution that combines intelligent, model-based tools to help the user to gain more accurate, accessible,form, fit, and actionable insight. With unique access to the Autodesk infrastructure software portfolio, users can benefit throughout the execution and lifecycle of transportation, land, and water projects. Three editions of Infrastructure Design Suites are available to meet each customer's particular business needs and offer the depth and breadthfunction of the Autodesk portfolio.product before it is ever built.
AutoCAD Civil 3D products provide a surveying, design, analysis, and documentation solution for civil engineering, including land development, transportation, and environmental projects. Using a model-centric approach that automatically updates documentation as design changes are made, AutoCAD Civil 3D products enable civil engineers, designers, drafters, and surveyors to significantly boost productivity and deliver higher-quality designs and construction documentation faster. With AutoCAD Civil 3D products, the entire project team works from the same consistent, up-to-date model so they stay coordinated throughout all project phases.
AutoCAD Map 3DCAM Solutions
AutoCAD Map 3DOur computer-aided manufacturing ("CAM") software, provides direct access to data neededobtained via our Delcam acquisition, offers industry-leading solutions for infrastructure planning, design,Computer Numeric Control ("CNC") machining, inspection, and management activities. AutoCAD Map 3D software helps professionals working on transportation, land development, water,modelling for manufacturing. A comprehensive line-up of expert products, including PowerMill, FeatureCAM, PowerInspect, PowerShare, and power projects to more easily create, manage,others, help our customers manufacture complex, innovative products and analyze design geographic information systemcomponents with maximum quality, control, and asset data.production efficiency.
PSEBFusion 360
Our PSEB segment includes our designFusion 360 is the first 3D CAD, CAM, and Computer-aided Engineering ("CAE") tool of its kind. It connects the entire product AutoCAD. Our AutoCAD product isdevelopment process on a single cloud-based platform product that underpins our design product offerings for all the industries we serve. For example, our AECworks on both Apple and MFG segments offer tailored versions of AutoCAD software for the industries they serve. Our AutoCAD product also provides a platform for our developer partners to build custom solutions for a range of diverse design-oriented markets. PSEB's revenue primarily includes revenue from sales of licenses of our design products, AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT, as well as the AutoCAD Design Suite and many other design and consumer products. The segment’s principal product offerings included the following during fiscal 2015:PC operating systems.
AutoCAD
AutoCAD software, which is our largest revenue-generating product, is a customizable and extensible computer-aided design (CAD) application for professional design, drafting, detailing, and visualization. AutoCAD software provides digital tools that can be used independently and in conjunction with other specific applications in fields ranging from construction to manufacturing, civil engineering, and process plant design.
AutoCAD LTBIM 360
AutoCAD LTBIM 360 construction management software is purpose built for professional draftingenables almost anytime, anywhere access to project data throughout the building construction lifecycle. BIM 360 empowers those in the field to better anticipate and detailing. AutoCAD LT includes document sharing capability withoutact, and those in the need for software customization or certain advanced functionality found in our AutoCAD product. Users can shareback office to optimize and manage all design data with team members who use our AutoCAD product or other Autodesk products built on AutoCAD. AutoCAD LT software is our second largest revenue-generating product.aspects of construction performance.
MFGShotgun
Our MFG segment provides manufacturersShotgun is cloud-based software for review and production tracking in automotive and transportation, industrial machinery, consumer products and building products with comprehensive digital prototyping solutions that bring together product data from all phases of the product development through production processM&E industry. Creative companies use the Shotgun platform to develop a single digital model created in Autodesk Inventor software. Our solutions for digital prototyping are scalable, attainable, cost-effective, and allow for real-world simulation, enabling a broad group of manufacturers to realize benefits with minimal disruption to existing workflows. MFG’s principal product offerings included the following during fiscal 2015:
Autodesk Product Design Suites
Autodesk Product Design Suites ("PDS") is a comprehensive solution for digital prototyping, delivering 3D design, visualization and simulation tools to complete the entire engineering process. The digital prototyping capabilities of PDS can help customers design better products, reduce development costs and get to market faster. Two editions of PDS are available to meet each customer's particularprovide essential business needs and offer the depth and breadth of the Autodesk portfolio.
Autodesk Inventor
Autodesk Inventor allows manufacturers to go beyond 3D design to digital prototyping by giving engineers a comprehensive and flexible set of tools for 3D mechanical design, simulation, analysis, tooling, visualization,managers and documentation. With Autodesk Inventor, engineers can integrate AutoCAD drawings and model-based design data into a single digital model, creating a virtual representation of a final product that enables them to validate the form, fit, and function of the product before it is ever built.
AutoCAD Mechanical
AutoCAD Mechanical software is purpose-built to accelerate the mechanical design process. AutoCAD Mechanical software offers users significant productivity gains and helps save hours of design time by including all the functionality of AutoCAD software, in addition to comprehensive libraries of standards-based parts andvisual collaboration tools for automating common design tasks.artists and supervisors, who often work globally with distributed teams.
Autodesk Moldflow
The Autodesk Moldflow family of injection molding simulation software provides tools that help manufacturers optimize the design of plastic parts and injection molds, and study the injection molding process.
M&E
Our M&E segment consists of two product groups: Animation and Creative Finishing. Animation products are sold as software only and provide tools for digital sculpting, modeling, animation, effects, rendering, and compositing for design visualization, visual effects and games production. Creative Finishing products are primarily sold as turnkey solutions for editing, finishing and visual effects design and color grading. Principal product offerings in our M&E segment’s Animation and Creative Finishing product groups included the following during fiscal 2015:
Animation
Autodesk 3ds Max
Autodesk 3ds Max software provides 3D modeling, animation, and rendering solutions that enable game developers, design visualization professionals and visual effects artists to digitally create realistic images, animations, and complex scenes and to digitally communicate abstract or complex mechanical, architectural, engineering, and construction concepts.
Autodesk Maya
Autodesk Maya software provides 3D modeling, animation, effects, rendering and compositing solutions that enable film and video artists, game developers, and design visualization professionals to digitally create engaging, lifelike images, realistic animations and simulations, extraordinary visual effects, and full length animated feature films.
Creative Finishing
Autodesk Flame, Autodesk Smoke, and Autodesk Lustre
Autodesk Flame software is an interactive real-time design, finishing, grading, and visual effects solution for supervised post-production. Autodesk Smoke software is a non-linear and non-compressed online editing, effects, and finishing software application and is used in commercials, music videos, corporate video, film as well as broadcast design projects. Autodesk Lustre software is a high-performance color grading solution used by artists for creative look development and final color and lighting effects for both film and television.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND INTRODUCTION
The technology industry is characterized by rapid technological change in computer hardware, operating systems, and software. In addition, our customers’ requirements and preferences rapidly evolve, as do their expectations of the performance of our software.software and services. To keep pace with these changes, we maintain a vigorous program of new product development to address demands in the marketplace for our products.
The software industry is undergoing a transition from the personal computer to cloud, social, and mobile computing. In fiscal 2015,2017, we continued to successfully implement a strategic transition of our business model announced in fiscal 2014. To support our transition, effective February 1, 2016, we discontinued the sale of new commercial seats of most individual software products, which are now exclusively available by desktop subscription, and discontinued selling perpetual licenses of suites while introducing industry collections effective August 1, 2016. Industry collections allow access to a broad set of products and cloud services that exceeds those previously available in suites - simplifying the customers' ability to access a complete set of industry tools. We accelerated our move to thenow offer term-based product subscriptions for individual products and industry collections, cloud service offerings, and expanded our flexible product license offerings. We introduced Desktop Subscription (formerly known as rental) for a broader range of our product portfolio, expanded our enterprise business agreements ("new token-based licensing program to more enterprise customers, and continued to expand our industry leading cloud based offerings.model subscription offerings"). These offerings are designed to give our customers even more value andincreased flexibility towith how they use our products and alsoservice offerings and to attract new typesa broader range of customers such as project-based users and small businesses that have more variable needs. Further,businesses. The transition to support our transition, we have discontinued licensing upgrades effective March 6, 2015a subscription model reflects the significant and on February 4, 2015, we also announced that new commercial seats of most standalone software products will be available only by desktop subscription beginning February 1, 2016. Collectively, these measures helped increase manygrowing interaction of our performance metrics including billings, deferred revenue,desktop software and subscriptions, which will result in more predictable and ratable revenue over time.our cloud services, working together to bring an integrated workflow to our customers.
We dedicate considerable technical and financial resources to research and development to further enhance our existing products and to create new products and technologies.technologies to expand our market opportunity. For example, in fiscal 2015,2017, we announced that we would create Spark,continued strategically investing in digital manufacturing by bringing together a 3D printing software platformnumber of products and technologies, focused on providing integrated solutions for developersadditive, subtractive, hybrid manufacturing, robotics and simulation. Digital manufacturing solutions provide our customers with the tools necessary to facilitate the advancement of 3D printing technology and beginadvance their manufacturing and selling Ember, an Autodesk-branded 3D printer. The Ember 3D printer became availableproduction software, processes and systems in order to achieve efficiency and cost reduction improvements. Digital manufacturing provides a unique opportunity for consumer purchasethese customers to connect designing, making, and using. We anticipate ongoing investments in February 2015.digital manufacturing and other product groups to both serve existing customers and expand market opportunity.
Research and development expenditures were $$766.1 million or 38% of fiscal 2017 net revenue, $790.0 million or 32% of fiscal 2016 net revenue and $725.2 million or 29% of fiscal 2015 net revenue. The increase in research and development expenditures as a percentage of revenue $611.1 million or 27%compared to fiscal 2016 and 2015 was driven by the decrease in our total revenue as a result of fiscal 2014 net revenue and $600.0 million or 26% of fiscal 2013 net revenue.our business model transition. Our software is primarily developed internally; however, we also use independent firms and contractors to perform some of our product development activities. Additionally, we acquire products or technology developed by others by purchasing or licensing products and technology from third parties. We continually review these investments in an effort to ensure that we are generating sufficient revenue or gaining a competitive advantage to justify their costs.
The majority of our research and product development is performed in the United States, China, Singapore, Canada, and Canada.the United Kingdom. However, we employ experienced software developers in many of our other locations. Translation and localization of our products are performed in a number of local markets, principally Singapore and Switzerland. We generally localize and translate our products into German, French, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Japanese, Korean, and simplified and traditional Chinese.
We plan to continue to managemanaging significant product development operations internationally over the next several years. We believe that our ability to conduct research and development at various locations throughout the world allows us to optimize
product development, lower costs, and integrate local market knowledge into our development activities. We continually assess the significant costs and challenges, including intellectual property protection, against the benefits of our international development activities.
In addition, our business and our customers benefit from our relationships with a network of over 4,000 third-party developers who develop and sell their own products that further enhance the range of integrated solutions available to our customers.
For further discussion regarding risks from our product development and introduction efforts, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
MARKETING AND SALES
We license or sell our products and services globally, primarily through indirect channels consisting of distributors and resellers. To a lesser extent we also transact directly with a select set ofour enterprise and named account customers who are primarily large corporations.and with customers through our digitally transacted online Autodesk branded store. Our indirect channel model includes both a two-tiered distribution structure, where distributors sell to resellers, and a one-tiered structure, where Autodesk sells directly to resellers. We have a network of approximately 2,2001,700 resellers and distributors worldwide. For fiscal 20152017, approximately 83%72% of our revenue was derived from indirect channel sales through distributors and resellers, and we expect that the majority of our revenue will continue to be derived from indirect channel sales in the future.
We anticipate that our channel mix will continue to change, particularly as we scale our digitally transacted online Autodesk branded store business and our largest accounts shift towards direct-only business models. Importantly, we expect our indirect channel will continue to transact and support the majority of our newrevenue as we move beyond the business model and plan to proactively work with our channel partners to ensure a smooth transition. We employ a variety of incentive programs and promotions to align our reseller channel with our business strategies.
Sales through our largest distributor, Tech Data Corporation and its global affiliates, accounted for 25%30%, 24%25%, and 23%25% of our net revenue for fiscal years 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, respectively. We believe our business is not substantially dependent on Tech Data. Our customers through Tech Data are the resellers and end users who purchase our software licenses and services. Should any of the agreements between us and Tech Data be terminated for any reason, we believe the resellers and end users who currently purchase our products through Tech Data would be able to continue to do so under substantially the same terms from one of our many other distributors without substantial disruption to our revenue. No other distributor, reseller, or direct customer accounted for 10% or more of our revenue.
Our customer-related operations are divided into three geographic regions, the Americas; Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”), and Asia Pacific (“APAC”). Each geographic region is supported by global marketing and sales organizations. These organizations develop and manage overall marketing and sales programs and work closely with a network of domestic and international sales offices. Fiscal 20152017 net revenue in the Americas, EMEA, and APAC was $898.0$871.9 million (36%43%), $980.0$800.4 million (39%), and $634.2$358.7 million (25%18%), respectively. We intend to continue to make our products available in foreign languages. We believe that international sales will continue to comprise the majority of our total net revenue. Adverse economic conditions and currency exchange rates in the countries that contribute a significant portion of our net revenue, including emerging economies, may have an adverse effect on our business in those countries and our overall financial performance. A summary of our financial information by geographic location is found in Note 13, “Segments,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our international operations and sales subject us to a variety of risks; see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for further discussion.
We also work directly with reseller and distributor sales organizations, computer manufacturers, other software developers, and peripherals manufacturers in cooperative advertising, promotions, and trade-show presentations. We employ mass-marketing techniques such as webcasts, seminars, telemarketing, direct mailings, sponsorships, advertising in business and trade journals, and social media. We have a worldwide user group organization and we have created online user communities dedicated to the exchange of information related to the use of our products.products and services.
In addition to sales of new perpetual use software licenses, weWe generate revenue primarily through several subscription-based business models.various offerings that provide recurring revenue. The largest is our maintenance plan program, under which customers who own a perpetual use license for the most recent version of the underlying product are able to purchaserenew a previously purchased maintenance plan that provides them with unspecified upgrades when-and-if-availablewhen and are able to download e-Learning coursesif available, and receive online support over a one year or multi-yearduring the term of their maintenance service period.contract. We also offer moresubscriptions which provide our customers with flexible term-based license offerings tolicenses of our customers.software and services. With the discontinuation of the sale of most perpetual licenses, we have accelerated our transition away from selling a mix of perpetual licenses and maintenance plans toward a single subscription model.
Our ability to effectively distribute our products depends in part upon the financial and business condition of our distributor and reseller networks. The loss of, or a significant reduction in, business with any one of our major distributors or large resellers could harm our business; see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for further discussion.
CUSTOMER AND RESELLER SUPPORT
We provide technical support and training to customers through a leveragedmulti-tiered support model, augmented by direct programs designed to address certain specific customer needs. OurMost of our customers rely primarily onreceive support and training from the resellers and distributors from which they purchased subscriptions or licenses tofor our products for technical support; however, we do provide certain director services, with Autodesk in turn providing second tier support for someto the resellers and distributors. Other customers are supported directly via self-service using the Autodesk Knowledge Network which guides customers to answers in our online support assets, support forums, webinars or to support representatives using a number of our customers.different modalities such as social media, phone, email and webchat. We also support our resellers and distributors through technical product training, sales training classes, the Internet,webinars and telephone. We also provide online support directly to our customers through our maintenance program. There are also a number of user group forums in which customers are able to share information.other knowledge sharing programs.
EDUCATION, SUSTAINABILITY, AND PHILANTHROPIC PROGRAMS
Education
Our Education initiatives inspire the youth of todayAutodesk is committed to imagine, design, and create a better world by offering free educational licenses of Autodesk software worldwide to students, educators, and educational institutions.
We helphelping fuel a lifelong passion for design inand making among students of all agesages. We offer free educational subscriptions of Autodesk's professional software to students, educators, and collaborate with educators,educational institutions worldwide. Through Autodesk Design Academy, we provide secondary and partners that encourage design learning and furtherpostsecondary schools hundreds of standards-aligned class projects to support design-based disciplines in Science, Technology, Engineering, Digital Arts, and Math (STEAM) education objectives. Withinusing Autodesk's professional-grade design, engineering and entertainment software. Autodesk Design Academy curricula is also syndicated on iTunes U and Udemy, where millions of students go to learn online. Classes are available on our Instructables website for anyone looking to expand their "making" skills. Our intention is to make Autodesk software ubiquitous and the secondary and postsecondary global education markets, our learning content and standards based curriculum enable tomorrow’s workforcedesign software of choice for those poised to graduate industry-ready, with marketable design skills that are in high demand. Whether these students are futurebecome the next generation of professional designers or lifelong design hobbyists, our full portfolio of professional-grade and personal design products introduces students and educators at all levels to software that can unleash their creativity.users.
Sustainability Programs
To help our customers imagine, design, and create a better world, our Sustainability Programsinitiatives focus our efforts on the area where we can have the greatest impact: providing sustainability solutions,impact enabling sustainable practices through our products delivering sustainable designfree sustainable-design learning and training opportunities, expanding accessresources, providing software grants to technology,qualifying nonprofits and entrepreneurs, and leading by example with our sustainable business practices. This benefits our customers, who useThrough our products and services, we are supporting our customers to better understand and improve design decisionsthe environmental performance of everything they make.
Climate Change
In addressing the global challenges posed by climate change, we make it possible for our customers to innovate and respond to associated changes in regulation, building code, physical climate parameters and other climate-related developments. This effort can directly and indirectly create more demand for existing and new Autodesk products and services in the short and long-term. Furthermore, our leadership is committed to taking climate action and that commitment goes hand-in-hand with our reputation in the marketplace.
Climate Change Management Actions
To drive continued progress and meet growing demand, we continue to expand the solutions, education, and support we offer, helping customers secure a competitive advantage for a low carbon future by designing high-performance buildings, resilient cities and infrastructure, and more efficient transportation and products. To continue to grow this market, we provide software and support to early stage entrepreneurs and start-up companies who are designing clean technologies. We plan to expand these offerings in the future based upon demand and opportunity in response to challenges posed by climate change.
Internally, we are investing in best practices to mitigate our greenhouse gas emissions and climate change risk through investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, disaster management and recovery strategies, and materials innovation. We are on track to meet our science-based greenhouse gas reduction target of 43% absolute emissions by 2020.
Climate Change Governance
Ultimately, our co-CEOs, have substantialthe highest level of direct responsibility for addressing our climate-change related risks and long-term environmental impacts. Through accessopportunities. Autodesk has established an Environmental Core Team which reports indirectly to free resourcesour co-CEOs. The Environmental Core Team has direct responsibility for setting and implementing the corporate sustainability strategy, including the climate change strategy.
Emissions Performance & Other Key Performance Indicators
By end of fiscal 2016, Autodesk Sustainability Workshop, Building Performance Analysis Certificate ("BPAC") Programhad reduced its greenhouse gas emissions for its operational boundary by 33% from our fiscal year 2009 baseline to 172,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. This reduction was accomplished through increased investment in renewable energy and building design courses, studentsenergy efficiency in our global real estate portfolio, and professionals are learning howcontinued transition from physical software delivery to use design technologycloud and analyticselectronic software delivery. In fiscal 2017, we added emissions from our supply chain to make better, more sustainable design decisions duringour measurement boundary. More information about our sustainability commitment can be found in our annual sustainability reports, which we have published on our website since 2008. Our fiscal 2017 sustainability report will be published in the design process.second quarter of fiscal 2018.
Philanthropy
The Autodesk Foundation (the "Foundation"), a privately funded 501(c)(3) charity organization established and solely funded by us, leads our philanthropic efforts. The purpose of the Foundation is twofold: to support employees to create a better world at work, at home, and in the community by matching employee’s volunteer time and/or donations to nonprofit organizations; and to support organizations and individuals using design to drive positive social and environmental impact. In the latter case, we use grant funding, software donations, and training to accomplish this goal, selecting the most impactful and innovative organizations around the world, thus, leading to a better future for our planet. On our behalf, the Foundation also administers a discounted software donation program to nonprofit organizations, social and environmental entrepreneurs, and others who are developing design solutions that will shape a more sustainable future.
DEVELOPER PROGRAMS
Our business and our customers benefit from our relationships with an extensive developer network. These developers create and sell their own interoperable products that further enhance the range of integrated solutions available to our customers. One of our key strategies is to maintain an open-architecture design of our software products to facilitate third-party development of complementary products and industry-specific software solutions. This approach enables customers and third partiesthird-parties to customize solutions for a wide variety of highly specific uses. We offer several programs that provide marketing, sales,strategic investment funding, technological platforms, user communities, technical support, forums, and programming toolsevents to developers who develop add-on applications for our products. Over 4,000For example, we have created our web services platform, Autodesk Forge. The Forge Platform includes a number of web services that enable software developers into rapidly develop the next generation of applications, and experiences that will power the future of making things. Forge facilitates the development of a single connected ecosystem for integrating Autodesk Developer Network create interoperable products that further enhance the range of integrated solutions available to our customers.applications with other enterprise, web and mobile solutions.
COMPETITION
The markets for our products are highly competitive, andare subject to rapid change.change, and can have complex interdependencies between many of the larger businesses. We strive to increase our competitive separation by investing in research and development, allowing us to bring new products to market and create exciting new versions of existing products that offer compelling efficiencies for our customers. We also compete through investments in marketing and sales to more effectively reach new customers and better serve existing customers.
Our competitors include large, global, publicly traded companies; small, geographically focused firms; startup firms; and solutions produced in-house by their users. Our primary global competitors in the PSEB, AEC, and MFG segments include Adobe Systems Incorporated, ANSYS, Inc., Apple Inc., AVEVA Group plc, Avid Technology, Inc., Bentley Systems, Incorporated,Inc., Dassault Systèmes S.A. and its subsidiary Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp., Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI), Intergraph Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hexagon AB, MSC Software Corporation, Nemetschek AG, PTC, 3D Systems, SeimensSiemens PLM, SONY Corporation, Technicolor, and Trimble Navigation Limited.Limited, among others.
Our M&E segment also competes with a wide range of different companies from large, global, publicly-traded companies to small private entities. Large organizations that produce products that compete in some or all of our markets include Adobe Systems Incorporated, Apple Inc., Avid Technology, Inc., SONY Corporation, and Technicolor, among others. The media and entertainment market is highly fragmented with complex interdependencies between many of the larger businesses. As a result, some of our competitors also own subsidiaries that are our customers or our partners in developing or bringing to market some of our solutions. In addition to traditional competitors in developed economies, we encounter new competitors in emerging economies.
The software industry has limited barriers to entry, and the availability of computing power with continually expanding performance at progressively lower prices contributes to the ease of market entry. The industry is presently undergoing a
platform shift from the personal computer to cloud and mobile computing. This shift further lowers barriers to entry and poses a disruptive challenge to established software companies. The design software market is characterized by vigorous competition in each of the vertical markets in which we compete, both from existing competitors and by entry of new competitors with innovative technologies. Competition is increasingly enhanced by consolidation of companies with complementary products and technologies and the possibility that competitors in one vertical segment may enter other vertical segments that we serve. In addition, some of our competitors in certain markets have greater financial, technical, sales and marketing, and other resources than we do. Because of these and other factors, competitive conditions in these industries are likely to continue to intensify in the future. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced net revenue and profit margins, and loss of market share, any of which could harm our business. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for further discussion of risks regarding competition.
We believe that our future results depend largely upon our ability to better serve customers by offering new products, including cloud and mobile computing products, whether by internal development or acquisition, and to continue to provide existing product offerings that compete favorably with respect to ease of use, reliability, performance, range of useful features, continuing product enhancements, reputation, price, and training.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LICENSES
We maintain an active program to legally protect our investment in technology through intellectual property rights. We protect our intellectual property through a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protections, confidentiality procedures, and contractual provisions. The nature and extent of legal protection associated with each such intellectual property right depends on, among other things, the type of intellectual property right and the given jurisdiction in which such right arises. We believe that our intellectual property rights are valuable and important to our business, including each of our segments.business.
Nonetheless, our intellectual property rights may not be successfully asserted in the future or may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. In addition, the laws and enforcement of the laws of various foreign countries where our products are distributed do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws. Enforcement of intellectual property rights against alleged infringers can sometimes lead to costly litigation and counterclaims. Our inability to protect our proprietary information could harm our business.
From time to time, we receive claims alleging infringement of a third party’s intellectual property rights, including patents. Disputes involving our intellectual property rights or those of another party have in the past and may in the future lead to, among other things, costly litigation or product shipment delays, which could harm our business.
We retain ownership of software we develop. Desktop software is licensed to users pursuant to ‘click through’ or signed license agreements containing restrictions on duplication, disclosure, and transfer. Cloud software and associated services are provided to users pursuant to on-line or signed terms of service agreements containing restrictions on access and use.
We believe that because of the limitations of laws protecting our intellectual property and the rapid, ongoing technological changes in both the computer hardware and software industries, we must rely principally upon software engineering and marketing skills to continually maintain and enhance our competitive market position.
While we have recovered some revenue resulting from the unauthorized use of our software products, we are unable to measure the full extent to which piracy of our software products exists. We believe, however, that software piracy is and can be expected to be a persistent problem that negatively impacts our revenue and financial results. We believe that our transition from perpetual use software licenses to a subscription-based business model combined with the change from desktop to cloud-based computing will shift the incentives and means by which software is pirated.
In addition, through various licensing arrangements, we receive certain rights to intellectual property of others. We expect to maintain current licensing arrangements and to secure licensing arrangements in the future, as needed and to the extent available on reasonable terms and conditions, to support continued development and sales of our products and services. Some of these licensing arrangements require or may require royalty payments and other licensing fees. The amount of these payments and fees may depend on various factors, including but not limited to: the structure of royalty payments, offsetting considerations, if any, and the degree of use of the licensed technology.
See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for further discussion of risks related to protecting our intellectual property.
PRODUCTION AND SUPPLIERS
The production of our PSEB, AEC, MFG, and certain M&E software products and services involves duplication or hosting of the software media. The purchase of media andAs we progress through our business model transition, the transfer of theway that we deliver software programs onto media for distribution to customers are performed by us and by licensed subcontractors. Media for our products such as DVDs and USB flash drives are available from multiple sources.has evolved. For certain cloud-based products, and countries,we use a combination of infrastructure-as-a-service providers like Amazon Web Services as well as co-located hosting facilities. For other products, we offer customers an electronic software download option for both initial product fulfillment as well as product updates for maintenance subscribers. Customers who choose electronic fulfillment receive the latest version of the software from our vendor’s secure servers. For certain cloud-based products, we use a combinationCustomers may also obtain our software through media such as DVDs and USB flash drives available from multiple sources. The purchase of co-located hosting facilities as well as infrastructure-as-a-service providers like Amazon Web Services.media and the transfer of the software programs onto media for distribution to customers are performed by us and by licensed subcontractors. Packaging materials are produced to our specifications by outside sources. Production is performed in leased facilities operated by independent third-party contractors. To date, we have not experienced any material difficulties or delays in the production of our software and documentation.
EMPLOYEES
As of January 31, 2015,2017, we employed approximately 8,8239,000 people. None of our employees in the United States are represented by a labor union. In certain foreign countries, our employees are represented by work councils. We have never experienced any work stoppages and believe our employee relations are good. Reliance upon employees in other countries entails various risks and changes in these foreign countries, such as government instability or regulation unfavorable to foreign-owned businesses, which could negatively impact our business in the future.
ACQUISITIONS
Over the past three years, we acquired new technology or supplemented our technology by purchasing businesses or certain technology related assets focused in specific markets or industries. For the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, we acquired a number of companies and certain technology related assets, some of which were accounted for as business combinations. The following were keysignificant acquisitions for fiscal years 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013:2015:
|
| | | | |
| Date of closing | | Company | | Details |
| November 2015 | | netfabb GmbH ("netfabb") | | The acquisition of netfabb GmbH (“netfabb”) provided Autodesk with software solutions that reduced production costs and increased efficiency in 3D printing and additive manufacturing. |
| June 2014 | | Shotgun Software Inc. ("Shotgun") | | The acquisition of Shotgun providesprovided a cloud-based production management solution that enablesenabled digital studios to track, schedule, review, and collaborate on projects and images. Shotgun was integrated, and the related goodwill has been assigned to, Autodesk's M&E reportable segment. |
| May 2014 | | Within Technologies Limited ("Within”) | | The acquisition of Within will accelerateaccelerated Autodesk’s development of tools and technologies for advanced manufacturing, including 3D printing. Within was integrated into, and the related goodwill has been assigned to, Autodesk’s PSEB reportable segment. |
| February 2014 | | Delcam plc (“Delcam”) | | The acquisition of Delcam providesprovided Autodesk a range of design, manufacturing and inspection software that enablesenabled automated CADCAM solutions for a variety of industries, ranging from aerospace to toys and sports equipment. Delcam was integrated into, and the related goodwill has been assigned to, Autodesk's MFG reportable segment. |
November 2013 | | Graitec SA (“Graitec”) | | The acquisition of Graitec (including Graitec’s Advance Steel and Advance Concrete product lines, and associated employees) enhanced Autodesk’s offerings for structural engineering and expanded our portfolio of technology for BIM for structural fabrication and detailing. Graitec was integrated into Autodesk’s AEC segment. |
December 2012 | | PI-VR GmbH ("PI-VR") | | The PI-VR acquisition brings sophisticated visualization solutions that will strengthen and enhance our expertise in and offerings for automotive visualization. PI-VR has been integrated into, and the related goodwill was assigned to, the MFG segment.
|
October 2012 | | Qontext ("Qontext") | | The Qontext acquisition provides us with an enterprise business and social collaboration platform which extends our reach into design networks via contextual workflows. This also expands our expertise in cloud and social networking by supplementing existing knowledge in cloud, web, and mobile development. Qontext has been integrated into, and the related goodwill was assigned to, the PSEB segment. |
August 2012 | | Socialcam, Inc. ("Socialcam") | | The Socialcam acquisition strengthens our ability to make our product line more social, and deliver more mobile/web oriented products. In addition, the acquisition integrated with Autodesk 360 to further provide collaboration features to our professional customers. Socialcam has been integrated into, and the related goodwill was assigned to, the PSEB segment. |
June 2012 | | Vela Systems, Inc. ("Vela") | | The Vela acquisition provides a platform to deliver project information to the point of construction. Vela, integrated with Navisworks, augments the model-based data created in Revit, establishing a bi-direction and visual link between model elements and relevant information - streamlining the information management process from design through construction to hand-over and into operations. In addition, this acquisition delivers model-based construction via mobile and cloud. Vela has been integrated into, and the related goodwill was assigned to, the AEC segment. |
BACKLOG
We typically ship products shortly after receipt of an order, whichBacklog is common in the software industry. Our backlog consists ofdefined as current software license product orders which have not yet shipped. The categoryAs a result of current software license product orders which we have not yet shipped consists of orders from customers with approved credit status for currently available software products.
Backlogthe business model transition, there was $40.4 millionno backlog at January 31, 20152017 compared to $19.7$31.4 million at January 31, 2014. The actual amount of2016, and we do not expect material backlog at any particular time may not be a meaningful indicator ofin future business prospects as this amount is impacted by a number of factors not related to future trends or events such as the order fulfillment process, the method of software delivery or the linearity of our business within the fiscal period.periods.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
BillingsAnnualized Recurring Revenue (ARR)—Amounts billedRepresents the annualized value of our average monthly recurring revenue for the preceding three months. "Maintenance ARR” captures ARR relating to customers duringtraditional maintenance attached to perpetual licenses. "New Model ARR" captures ARR relating to new model subscription offerings. Recurring revenue acquired with the current fiscal period netacquisition of any partner incentives or other discounts.a business may cause variability in the comparison of this calculation.
ARR is currently on of our key performance metrics to assess the health and trajectory of our business. ARR should be viewed independently of revenue and deferred revenue as ARR is a performance metric and is not intended to be combined with any of these items.
BIM (BuildingAnnualized Revenue Per Subscription (ARPS)—Is calculated by dividing our annualized recurring revenue by the total number of subscriptions.
Building Information Modeling)Modeling (BIM)—BIM describes a model-based technology linked with a database of project information, and is the process of generating and managing information throughout the life cycle of a building. BIM is used as a digital representation of the building process to facilitate exchange and interoperability of information in digital formats.
Cloud Service Offerings—Represents individual term-based offerings deployed through web browser technologies or in a hybrid software and cloud configuration. Cloud service offerings that are bundled with other product offerings are not captured as a separate cloud service offering.
Constant currency growth ratesCurrency (CC) Growth Rates—We attempt to represent the changes in the underlying business operations by eliminating fluctuations caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates as well as eliminating hedge gains or losses recorded within the current and comparative periods. OurWe calculate constant currency methodology removes all hedginggrowth rates by (i) applying the applicable prior period exchange rates to current period results and (ii) excluding any gains andor losses from foreign currency hedge contracts that are reported in the calculation.current and comparative periods.
Digital prototypingFlexible Enterprise Business Agreements—Digital prototyping allows designers, architects and engineersRepresents programs providing enterprise customers with token-based access or a fixed maximum number of seats to analyze, simulate, and visualize a design usingbroad pool of Autodesk products over a digital or virtual model rather than a physical model.defined contract term.
FlagshipIndustry Collections—Autodesk flagshipindustry collections are a combination of products are our core design products. Flagship includes the following products: 3ds Max, AutoCAD, AutoCAD LT, AutoCAD vertical products (such as AutoCADand services that target a specific user objective and support a set of workflows for that objective. Our Industry Collections consist of: Autodesk Architecture, Engineering and Mechanical), Civil 3D, Inventor products (standalone), Map 3D, Maya,Construction Collection, Autodesk Product Design Collection, and Revit products (standalone).Autodesk Media and Entertainment Collection. Autodesk introduced industry collections effective August 1, 2016 to replace its suites.
License and Other revenueRevenue—License and other revenue consists of two components: (1) all forms of product license revenue and (2) other revenue. Product license revenue includes software license revenue from the sale of seatperpetual licenses, term-based licenses from our desktop subscriptionproduct subscriptions and flexible enterprise offerings,business agreements, and product revenue for Creative Finishing. Other revenue includes revenue from consulting, training, Autodesk Developers Network and Creative Finishing customer support, and is recognized over time, as the services are performed.
Maintenance Plan—Our maintenance programplan provides our customers with a cost effective and predictable budgetary option to obtain the productivity benefits of our new releases and enhancements when and if released during the term of their contracts. Under our maintenance program,plan, customers are eligible to receive unspecified upgrades when and if available, downloadable training courses and online support. We recognize maintenance plan revenue over the term of the agreements, generally between one and three years.
New and AdjacentModel Subscription Offerings (New Model)—AutodeskComprises our term-based product subscriptions (formerly titled Desktop subscription), cloud service offerings, and flexible enterprise business agreements.
Recurring Revenue—Represents the revenue for the period from our maintenance plans and revenue from our new model subscription offerings, including portions of revenue allocated to license and adjacent products include Autodesk's newother revenue for those offerings. It excludes subscription revenue related to education offerings, consumer product offerings, as well as products that are not included in flagship or suites. New and adjacent includes the following services and products: Autodesk Alias Design products, Autodesk 360 products, Autodesk Consulting, Autodesk Simulation, Autodesk Simulation Multiphysics,select Creative Finishing product offerings, Autodesk Buzzsaw, Autodesk CF Design, Autodesk Constructware, Autodesk Consumer products, Autodesk Creative Finishing products, Delcam products, Autodesk Moldflow products, Autodesk Navisworks, Autodesk Scaleform, Autodesk Vault products, and all otherthird party products. Recurring revenue acquired with the acquisition of a business is reported when total subscriptions are captured in our systems and may cause variability in the comparison of this calculation.
Suites—Autodesk design suites are a combination of products that target a specific user objective (product design, building design, etc.) and support a set of workflows for that objective. Our current design and creationprimary suites include: AutoCAD Design Suite, Autodesk Building Design Suite, Autodesk Entertainment Creation Suite, Autodesk Factory Design Suite, Autodesk Infrastructure Design Suite, Autodesk Plant Design Suite, and Autodesk Product Design Suite. Autodesk discontinued selling new perpetual licenses of suites while introducing industry collections effective August 1, 2016.
Subscription revenueRevenue—Autodesk subscription revenue consists of three components: (1) maintenance plan revenue from our perpetual software products; (2) maintenance revenue from our term-based desktop subscriptionproduct subscriptions and flexible enterprise offerings;business agreements; and (3) revenue from our cloud service offerings.
Total Subscriptions—Consists of subscriptions from our maintenance desktop, cloud serviceplans and enterprise licensenew model subscription offerings that are active and paid as of the quarter end date. For certain cloud basedservice offerings and flexible enterprise license offerings, business agreements,
subscriptions represent the monthly average activity reported within the last three months of the quarter end date. Total subscriptions do not include data from education offerings, consumer product offerings, certainselect Creative Finishing product offerings, Autodesk Buzzsaw, Autodesk Constructware, and third party products. Subscriptions acquired with the acquisition of a business are captured once the data conforms to our subscription count methodology and when added, may cause variability in the comparison of this calculation.
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves significant risks, a number of which are beyond our control. In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, the following discussion highlights some of these risks and the possible impact of these factors on our business, financial condition, and future results of operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, or results of operations may be adversely impacted, causing the trading price of our common stock to decline. In addition, these risks and uncertainties may impact the “forward-looking” statements described elsewhere in this Form 10-K and in the documents incorporated herein by reference. They could affect our actual results of operations, causing them to differ materially from those expressed in “forward-looking” statements.
Global economic and political conditions may further impact our business, financial results and financial condition.
As our business has expanded globally, we have increasingly become subject to risks arising from adverse changes in global economic and political conditions. The past several years were characterized by weakmixed global economic conditions, volatile credit markets, volatile exchange rates, relatively high unemployment, a low level of liquidity in many financial markets, increased government deficit spending and debt levels, uncertainty about certain governments' abilities to repay such debt or to address certain fiscal issues, and volatility in many financial instrument markets. If economic growth in countries where we do business slows, such as in Japan or in emerging economies, or if such countries experience further economic recessions, customers may delay or reduce technology purchases. This could result in reductions in sales of our products and services, longer sales cycles and slower adoption of our technologies.
Over the past several years, many of our customers have experienced tighter credit, negative financial news and weaker financial performance of their businesses and have reduced their workforces, thereby reducing the number of licenses and the number of maintenance contracts they purchase from us. In addition, a number of our customers rely, directly and indirectly, on government spending. Current debt balances of many countries without proportionate increases in revenues have caused many countries to reduce spending and in some cases have forced those countries to restructure their debt in an effort to avoid defaulting under those obligations. This has not only impacted those countries but others that are holders of such debt and those assisting in such restructuring.
These actions may impact, and over the past several years have negatively impacted, our business, financial results and financial condition. Moreover, our financial performance may be negatively impacted by:
lack of credit available to, and the insolvency of, key channel partners, which may impair our distribution channels and cash flows;
counterparty failures negatively impacting our treasury functions, including timely access to our cash reserves and third-party fulfillment of hedging transactions;
counterparty failures negatively affecting our insured risks;
inability of banks to honor our existing line of credit, which could increase our borrowing expenses or eliminate our ability to obtain short-term financing; and
decreased borrowing and spending by our end users on small and large projects in the industries we serve, thereby reducing demand for our products.
In addition, in June 2016, voters in the United Kingdom approved an advisory referendum to withdraw from the European Union (commonly referred to as “Brexit”). The Brexit vote and the perceptions as to the impact of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union may adversely affect business activity, political stability and economic conditions in the United Kingdom, the European Union and elsewhere.
It is uncertain at this time how the new U.S. President, Administration and Congress will affect our business, including potentially through increased import tariffs and other influences on U.S. trade relations with other countries, such as Mexico and China. The imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers could increase our costs and reduce the competitiveness of our offerings in certain markets. In addition, other countries may change their own policies on business and foreign investment in companies in their respective countries.
Geopolitical trends toward nationalism and protectionism and the weakening or dissolution of international trade pacts may increase the cost of, or otherwise interfere with, conducting business. Uncertainty about current and future economic and political conditions on us, our customers and partners, makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments.
AFurther macro-economic degradation, a slower economic recovery in industries important to our business or adverse exchange rate movements, may adversely affect our business, financial results and financial condition. If a macro-economic recovery does not occur as rapidly as anticipated, our ability to meet our long-term financial targets may also be adversely affected.
If we fail to successfully manage our business model transition to cloud-based products and more flexible product licenses, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.
To address the industry transition from personal computer to cloud, social,mobile, and mobilesocial computing, we have accelerated our move to the cloud and are offering more flexible product licenses. As part of thisTo support our transition, we announced in fiscal 2014 that we are discontinuing upgrades after fiscal 2015 and, on February 4, 2015, we also announced thatdiscontinued selling new commercial seatsperpetual licenses of
most standaloneindividual software products will be available only by desktop subscription beginningeffective February 1, 2016, and discontinued selling new perpetual licenses of suites effective August 1, 2016. As a result, we expect to derive an increasing portion of our revenues in the future from subscriptions. This subscription model prices and delivers our products in a way that differs from the historical perpetual pricing and delivery methods. These changes reflect a significant shift from perpetual license sales and distribution of our software in favor of providing our customers the right to access certain of our software in a hosted environment or use downloaded software for a specified subscription period. During our transition, revenue, billings, gross margin, operating margin, net income (loss), earnings (loss) per share, deferred revenue, and cash flow from operations will be impacted as more revenue is recognized ratably rather than upfront and as new offerings bring a wider variety of price points.
Our ability to achieve our financial objectives is subject to risks and uncertainties. The new offerings require a considerable investment of technical, financial, legal, and sales resources, and a scalable organization. Market acceptance of such offerings is affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to: security, reliability, performance, current license terms, customer preference, social/community engagement, customer concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage their data, public concerns regarding privacy and the enactment of restrictive laws or regulations. Whether our business model transition will prove successful and will accomplish our business and financial objectives is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: customer demand, attach and renewal rates, channel acceptance, our ability to further develop and scale infrastructure, our ability to include functionality and usability in such offerings that address customer requirements, tax and accounting implications, pricing, and our costs. In addition, the metrics we use to gauge the status of our business model transition may evolve over the course of the transition as significant trends emerge. If we are unable to successfully establish these new offerings and navigate our business model transition in light of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.
Our strategy to develop and introduce new products and services exposes us to risks such as limited customer acceptance, costs related to product defects, and large expenditures, thateach of which may not result in additional net revenue or could result in decreased net revenue.
Rapid technological changes, as well as changes in customer requirements and preferences, characterize the software industry. Just as the transition from mainframes to personal computers transformed the industry 30 years ago, we believe our industry is undergoing a similar transition from the personal computer to cloud, mobile, and social computing. Customers are also reconsidering the manner in which they license software products, which requires us to constantly evaluate our business model and strategy. In response, we are focused on providing solutions to enable our customers to be more agile and collaborative on their projects. We are also developing consumer products for digital art, personal design and creativity, and home design. We devote significant resources to the development of new technologies. In addition, we frequently introduce new business models or methods that require a considerable investment of technical and financial resources such as an increase in our portfolio of, and focus on, suites and, most recently, our introduction of flexible license and service offerings. It is uncertain whether these strategies will prove successful or whether we will be able to develop the necessary infrastructure and business models more quickly than our competitors. We are making such investments through further development and enhancement of our existing products and services, as well as through acquisitions of new product lines. Such investments may not result in sufficient revenue generation to justify their costs and could result in decreased net revenue. For example, in fiscal 2015, we announced that we would create Spark, a 3D printing software platform for developers to facilitate the advancement of 3D printing technology, and begin manufacturing and selling Ember, an Autodesk-branded 3D printer. If we are not able to meet customer requirements, either with respect to our software or
hardware products or the manner in which we provide such products, or if we are not able to adapt our business model to meet our customers' requirements, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely impacted.
In particular, a critical component of our growth strategy is to have customers of our AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products expand their portfolios to include our suitesother offerings and cloud-based services. We want customers using standaloneindividual Autodesk products to expand their portfolio with our suitesother offerings and cloud-based offerings,services, and we are taking steps to accelerate this migration. At times, sales of licenses of our AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT or standaloneindividual Autodesk flagship products have decreased without a corresponding increase in suites productindustry collections or cloud-based services revenue or without purchases of customer seats to our suites.industry collections. Should this continue, our results of operations will be adversely affected. Also, adoption of our cloud and mobile computing offerings and changes in the delivery of our software and services to our customers, such as desktop subscription (formally(formerly referred to as rental) offerings, will change the way in which we recognize revenue relating to our software and services, with a potential negative impact on our financial performance. The accounting impact of these offerings and other business decisions are expected to result in an increase in the percentage of our ratable revenue, as well as recurring revenue, making for a more predictable business over time, while potentially reducing our upfront perpetual revenue stream. Additionally, the software products we offer are complex, and despite extensive testing and quality control, may contain errors or defects. These errors or defects could result in the need for corrective releases to our software products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenue, an increase in product returns or lack of market acceptance of our products, any of which would likely harm our business.
Our executive management team must act quickly, continuously, and with vision, given the rapidly changing customer expectations and technology advancements inherent in the software industry, the extensive and complex efforts required to
create useful and widely accepted products and the rapid evolution of cloud computing, mobile devices, new computing platforms, and other technologies, such as consumer products. Although we have articulated a strategy that we believe will fulfill these challenges, if we fail to execute properly on that strategy or adapt that strategy as market conditions evolve, we may fail to meet our customers' expectations, fail to compete with our competitors' products and technology, and lose the confidence of our channel partners and employees. This in turn could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Our entry into 3D printing presents many of the risks described above concerning developing and introducing new products as well as new risks for us. The manufacturing and 3D printing markets are highly competitive and some of our competitors have superior experience and resources superior to us.ours. We have limited experience designing, developing, and selling hardware products and no experience developing and selling printers. The market for 3D printing is nascent and may not develop as rapidly as we expect. Our sale of 3D printers could subject us to product and other liability that we do not currently face. If any of these risks materialize, it could adversely affect our business and financial performance as well as our reputation and brand.
Revenue from our offerings may be difficult to predict during our business model transition.
The discontinuance of our perpetual licenses for most individual software products on February 1, 2016 and for perpetual suites on August 1, 2016 has and will continue to result in the loss of future upfront licensing revenue. This also has frozen the growth of our maintenance subscription revenue because there will be no further opportunities to attach maintenance licensing. We expect our maintenance subscription revenue to decline over time, but it may decline more quickly than anticipated due to low maintenance renewals. At the same time, our new model subscription revenue may not grow as rapidly as anticipated. Our new model subscription pricing allows customers to use our offerings at a lower initial cost when compared to the sale of a perpetual license. Although our new model subscriptions are designed to increase the number of customers who purchase offerings and create a recurring revenue stream that is more predictable over time, it creates risks related to the timing of revenue recognition and expected reductions in cash flows in the near term.
We may not be able to predict subscription renewal rates and their impact on our future revenue and operating results.
Our customers are not obligated to renew their subscriptions for our offerings, and they may elect not to renew. We cannot assure renewal rates, or the mix of subscriptions renewals. Customer renewal rates may decline or fluctuate due to a number of factors, including offering pricing, competitive offerings, customer satisfaction, and reductions in customer spending levels or customer activity due to economic downturns or financial markets uncertainty. If our customers do not renew their subscriptions or if they renew on less favorable terms, our revenues may decline.
We are dependent on international revenue and operations, exposing us to significant regulatory, global economic, intellectual property, collections, currency exchange rate, taxation, political instability and other risks, which could adversely impact our financial results.
We are dependent on our international operations for a significant portion of our revenue. International net revenue represented 71%63% and 70%68% of our net revenue in fiscal 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Our international revenue, including that from emerging economies, is subject to general economic and political conditions in foreign markets, including conditions in foreign markets resulting from economic and political conditions in the U.S. Our revenue is also impacted by the relative geographical and country mix of our revenue over time. At times, these factors adversely impact our international revenue, and consequently our business as a whole. Our dependency on international revenue makes us much more exposed to global economic and political trends, which can negatively impact our financial results, even if our results in the U.S. are strong for a particular period. Further, a significant portion of our earnings from our international operations may not be freely transferable to the U.S. due to remittance restrictions, adverse tax consequences or other factors. Our intent is that amounts related to foreign earnings permanently reinvested outside the U.S. will remain outside the U.S., and we will meet our U.S. liquidity needs through ongoing cash flows, external borrowings (such as our senior notes), or both. However, if, in the future, amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are needed to fund our operations in the U.S., or to service our external borrowings, the repatriation of such amounts to the U.S. could result in a significant incremental tax liability in the period in which the decision to repatriate occurs and payment of any such tax liability would reduce the cash available to fund our operations.
We anticipate that our international operations will continue to account for a significant portion of our net revenue, and, as we expand our international development, sales and marketing expertise, will provide significant support to our overall efforts in countries outside of the U.S.
Risks inherent in our international operations include:
economic volatility;
fluctuating currency exchange rates, including risks related to any hedging activities we undertake;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and practices;
delays resulting from difficulty in obtaining export licenses for certain technology;
different purchase patterns as compared to the developed world;
tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers and restrictions;
transportation delays;
operating in locations with a higher incidence of corruption and fraudulent business practices, particularly in emerging economies;
increasing enforcement by the U.S. under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and adoption of stricter anti-corruption laws in certain countries, including the United Kingdom;
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign sales and development operations,operations;
local competition;
longer collection cycles for accounts receivable;
potential changes in tax laws, including possible U.S. and foreign tax law changes that, if enacted, could significantly impact how multinational companies are taxed;
tax arrangements with foreign governments, including our ability to meet and renew the terms of those tax arrangements;
laws regarding the management of and access to data and public networks;
possible future limitations upon foreign owned businesses;
increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities;
inadequate local infrastructure;
greater difficulty in protecting intellectual property;
software piracy; and
other factors beyond our control, including popular uprisings, terrorism, war, natural disasters, and diseases.
Some of our business partners also have international operations and are subject to the risks described above.
The Brexit vote has exacerbated and may further exacerbate many of the risks and uncertainties described above. The proposed withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union could, among other potential outcomes, adversely affect the tax, tax treaty, currency, operational, legal and regulatory regimes to which our businesses in the region are subject. The withdrawal could also, among other potential outcomes, disrupt the free movement of goods, services and people between the United Kingdom and the European Union and significantly disrupt trade between the United Kingdom and the European Union and other parties. Further, uncertainty around these and related issues could lead to adverse effects on the economy of the United Kingdom and the other economies in which we operate.
Even if we are able to successfully manage the risks of international operations, our business may be adversely affected if our business partners are not able to successfully manage these risks.
Actions that we are taking to restructure our business in alignment with our business model transition strategy may be costly and may not be as effective as anticipated.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we commenced a company-wide restructuring plan to accelerate the Company’s move to the cloud and its transition to a subscription-based business model. Through the restructuring, we sought to reduce expenses, streamline the organization, and reallocate resources to align more closely with the Company’s needs going forward. As a result of these actions, we have incurred and may incur additional costs in the short term that have the effect of reducing our operating margins. If we are unable to realize the expected outcomes from the restructuring efforts, our business and operating results may be harmed.
Our software is highly complex and may contain undetected errors, defects or vulnerabilities, each of which could harm our business and financial performance.
The software products that we offer are complex, and despite extensive testing and quality control, may contain errors, defects or vulnerabilities. Some errors, defects and vulnerabilities in our software products may only be discovered after the product or service has been released. Any errors, defects or vulnerabilities could result in the need for corrective releases to our software products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenue, an increase in product returns or lack of market acceptance of our products, any of which would likely harm our business and financial performance.
Existing and increased competition and rapidly evolving technological changes may reduce our revenue and profits.
The software industry has limited barriers to entry, and the availability of computing devices with continually expanding performance at progressively lower prices contributes to the ease of market entry. The industry is presently undergoing a platform shift from the personal computer to cloud and mobile computing. This shift further lowers barriers to entry and poses a disruptive challenge to established software companies. The markets in which we compete are characterized by vigorous competition, both by entry of competitors with innovative technologies and by consolidation of companies with complementary products and technologies. In addition, some of our competitors in certain markets have greater financial, technical, sales and marketing, and other resources. Furthermore, a reduction in the number and availability of compatible third-party applications, or our inability to rapidly adapt to technological and customer preference changes, including those related to cloud computing, mobile devices, and new computing platforms, may adversely affect the sale of our products. Because of these and other factors, competitive conditions in the industry are likely to intensify in the future. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced net revenue and profit margins and loss of market share, any of which would likely harm our business.
We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could negatively impact our financial results and cash flows.
Because we conduct a substantial portion of our business outside the U.S. and we make certain business and resource decisions based on assumptions about foreign currency, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and economic conditions change,change. For example, the June 23, 2016 announcement of Brexit caused significant volatility in global stock markets and theycurrency exchange rate
fluctuations that resulted in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies in which we conduct business. Our exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse impact on our financial results and cash flows.
We use derivative instruments to manage a portion of our cash flow exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As part of our risk management strategy, we use foreign currency contracts to manage a portion of our exposures of underlying assets, liabilities, and other obligations, which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. These foreign currency instruments have maturities that extend for one to twelve months in the future, and provide us with some protection against currency exposures. However, our attempts to hedge against these risks may not be completely successful, resulting in an adverse impact on our financial results.
The fluctuations of currencies in which we conduct business can both increase and decrease our overall revenue and expenses for any given fiscal period. Although our foreign currency cash flow hedge program extends beyond the current quarter in order to reduce our exposure to foreign currency volatility, we do not attempt to completely mitigate this risk, and in any case, will incur transaction fees in adopting such hedging programs. Such volatility, even when it increases our revenues or decreases our expenses, impacts our ability to accurately predict our future results and earnings.
A breach of security in our products, services or computer systems may compromise the integrity of our products or services, harm our reputation, create additional liability and adversely impact our financial results.
We make significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our source code and computer systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. These threats include but are not limited to identity theft, unauthorized access, DNS attacks, wireless network attacks, viruses and worms, advanced persistent threat (APT), application centric attacks, peer-to-peer attacks, phishing, backdoor trojans and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. Any of the foregoing could attack our products, services or computer systems. Despite significant efforts to create security barriers to such programs, it is virtually impossible for us to entirely eliminate this risk. Like all software, our software is vulnerable to cyber attacks. In the past, hackers have targeted our software, and they may do so in the future. The impact of cyber attacks could disrupt the proper functioning of our software products or services, cause errors in the output of our customers' work, allow unauthorized access to sensitive, proprietary or confidential information of ours or our customers, and other destructive outcomes. Moreover, as we continue to invest in new lines of consumer products and services we are exposed to increased security risks and the potential for unauthorized access to, or improper use of, the information of our consumer users. For example, cyber attacks could make our customers hesitant to adopt our cloud-based hosted subscription services, which could negatively impact our business model transition. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our reputation may suffer, customers may stop buying our products or services, we could face lawsuits and potential liability, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.
Changes in laws or regulations related to the Internet, local data storage or related to privacy and data security concerns may impact our business or expose us to increased liability.
The future success of our business depends upon the continued use of the Internet as a primary medium for commerce, communication, and business applications. Federal, state, or foreign government bodies or agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws or regulations affecting data privacy and the transmission of certain types of content using the Internet. For example, the State of California has adopted legislation requiring operators of commercial websites and mobile applications that collect personal information from California residents to conspicuously post and comply with privacy policies that satisfy certain requirements. Several other U.S. states have adopted legislation requiring companies to protect the security of personal information that they collect from consumers over the Internet, and more states may adopt similar legislation in the future. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission has used its authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to bring actions against companies for failing to maintain adequate security for personal information collected from consumers over the Internet and for failing to comply with privacy- related representations made to Internet users. The U.S. Congress has at various times proposed federal legislation intended to protect the privacy of Internet users and the security of personal information collected from Internet users that would impose additional compliance burdens upon companies collecting personal information from Internet users, and the U.S. Congress may adopt such legislation in the future. The European Union also has adopted various directives regulating data privacy and security and the transmission of content using the Internet involving residents of the European Union, including those directives known as the Data Protection Directive, the E-Privacy Directive, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive, and may adopt similar directives in the future. Other countries, including Canada and several Latin American and Asian countries, have constitutional protections for, or have adopted legislation protecting, individuals' personal information. Additionally, some federal, state, or foreign governmental bodies have
established laws that seek to censor the transmission of certain types of content over the Internet or require that individuals be provided with the ability to permanently delete all electronic personal information, such as the German Multimedia Law of 1997 and the California “Eraser law” for minors. Additionally, some foreign governmental bodies (such as Russia and China) have established laws or have proposed laws that seek to require local data storage.
In addition, new laws and industry self-regulatory codes have been enacted and more are being considered that may affect our ability to reach current and prospective customers, to understand how our products and services are being used, to respond to customer requests allowed under the laws, and to implement our new business models effectively. These new laws and regulations would similarly affect our competitors as well as our customers.
Given the variety of global privacy and data protection regimes, it is possible we may find ourselves subject to inconsistent obligations. For instance, the USA Patriot Act is considered by some to be in conflict with certain directives of the European Union. Situations such as these require that we make prospective determinations regarding compliance with conflicting regulations. Increased enforcement of existing laws and regulations, as well as any laws, regulations or changes that may be adopted or implemented in the future, could limit the growth of the use of public cloud applications or communications generally, result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based applications, and require us to implement additional technological safeguards.
In addition, in October 2015 the European Court of Justice issued a ruling immediately invalidating the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, which facilitated personal data transfers to the U.S. in compliance with applicable EU data protection laws. In February 2016, the European Commission and the United States agreed on a new framework for transatlantic data flows: the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. We rely on other legal mechanisms for data transfer and continue to comply with the previous U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework and U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework as set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding the collection, use, and retention of personal information from European Union member countries and Switzerland.
Increasing regulatory focus on privacy issues could impact our new business models and expose us to increased liability.
Governments, privacy advocates and class action attorneys are increasingly scrutinizing how companies collect, process, use, store, share or transmit personal data. Any perception of our practices or products as an invasion of privacy, whether or not consistent with current regulations and industry practices, may subject us to public criticism, class action lawsuits, reputational harm or claims by regulators, industry groups or other third parties, all of which could disrupt our business and expose us to increased liability.
We rely on third-parties to provide us with a number of operational services, including hosting and delivery and certain of our customer services and other operations and processing of data; any interruption or delay in service from these third parties, breaches of security or privacy could expose us to liability, harm our reputation and adversely impact our financial performance.
We increasingly rely on hosted computer services from third parties for services that we provide our customers and computer operations for our internal use. As we gather customer data and host certain customer data in third-party facilities, a security breach could compromise the integrity or availability or result in the theft of customer data. In addition, our operations could be negatively affected in the event of a security breach, and we could be subject to the loss or theft of confidential or proprietary information, including source code.
Unauthorized access to this data may be obtained through break-ins, breaches of our secure networks by unauthorized parties, employee theft or misuse, or other misconduct. We rely on a number of third party suppliers in the operation of our business for the provision of various services and materials that we use in the operation of our business and production of our products. We may from time to time rely on a single or limited number of suppliers, or upon suppliers in a single country, for these services or materials. The inability of such third parties to satisfy our requirements could disrupt our business operations or make it more difficult for us to implement our business strategy. If any of these situations were to occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could be subject to third party liability, including under data protection and privacy laws in certain jurisdictions, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.
If we do not maintain good relationships with the members of our distribution channel, or achieve anticipated levels of sell-through, our ability to generate revenue will be adversely affected. If our distribution channel suffers financial losses, becomes financially unstable or insolvent, or is not provided the right mix of incentives to sell our products, our ability to generate revenue will be adversely affected.
We sell our software products both directly to end-users and through a network of distributors and resellers. For fiscal 20152017 and fiscal 20142016, approximately 72% and 79%, approximately 83% and 84%respectively, of our revenue was derived from indirect channel sales through distributors and resellers respectively, and we expect that the majority of our revenue will continue to be derived from indirect channel sales in the future. Our ability to effectively distribute our products depends in part upon the financial and business condition of our distributor and reseller network. Computer software distributors and resellers typically are not highly capitalized, have previously experienced difficulties during times of economic contraction and experienced difficulties during the past several years. We have processes to ensure that we assess the creditworthiness of distributors and resellers prior to our sales to them. In the past we have taken steps to support them, and may take additional steps in the future, such as extending credit terms and providing temporary discounts. These steps, if taken, could harm our financial results. If our distributors and resellers were to become insolvent, they would not be able to maintain their business and sales, or provide customer support services, which would negatively impact our business and revenue.
We rely significantly upon major distributors and resellers in both the U.S. and international regions, including the distributor Tech Data Corporation and its global affiliates (“Tech Data”). Tech Data accounted for 30%and25% and 24% of our total net revenue for fiscal 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Although we believe that we are not substantially dependent on Tech Data, if Tech Data were to experience a significant disruption with its business or if our relationship with Tech Data were to significantly deteriorate, it is possible that our ability to sell to end users would be, at least temporarily, negatively impacted. This could in turn negatively impact our financial results.
Over time, we have modified and will continue to modify aspects of our relationship with our distributors and resellers, such as their incentive programs, pricing to them and our distribution model to motivate and reward them for aligning their businesses with our strategy and business objectives. Changes in these relationships and underlying programs could negatively impact their business and harm our business. In addition, the loss of or a significant reduction in business with those distributors or resellers or the failure to achieve anticipated levels of sell-through with any one of our major international distributors or large resellers could harm our business. In particular, if one or more of such distributors or resellers were unable to meet their obligations with respect to accounts payable to us, we could be forced to write off such accounts and may be required to delay the recognition of revenue on future sales to these customers. These events could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
A significant portion of our revenue is generated through maintenance revenue; if decreases in maintenance revenue are not offset by increases in new model subscription revenue, our future revenue and financial results will be negatively impacted.
Our maintenance customers have no obligation to renew their maintenance contracts after the expiration of their maintenance period, which is typically one year. The discontinuance of our perpetual licenses for most individual software products on February 1, 2016 and for perpetual suites on August 1, 2016 resulted in the loss of future maintenance attach opportunities. We expect customer renewal rates will decline or fluctuate over time as a result of a number of factors, including the overall global economy, the health of their businesses, the perceived value of the maintenance program and planned maintenance pricing increases. If our non-renewing maintenance customers do not transition to our new business model subscriptions, our future revenue and financial results will be negatively impacted.
We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance contracts, which is predominantly one year, but may also range up to five years. Decreases in maintenance billings will negatively impact future maintenance revenue, however future maintenance revenue will also be impacted by other factors such as the amount, timing and mix of contract terms of future billings.
Our financial results fluctuate within each quarter and from quarter to quarter making our future revenue and financial results difficult to predict.
Our quarterly financial results have fluctuated in the past and will continue to do so in the future. These fluctuations could cause our stock price to change significantly or experience declines. We also provide investors with quarterly and annual financial forward-looking guidance that could prove to be inaccurate as a result of these fluctuations. In addition to the other factors described in this Part I,, Item 1A,, some of the factors that could cause our financial results to fluctuate include:
general market, economic, business, and political conditions in particular geographies, including Europe, APAC, and emerging economies;
failure to produce sufficient revenue, billings or subscription growth, and profitability;
failure to achieve anticipated levels of customer acceptance toof our business model transition, including the impact of the end of upgrades and perpetual licenses;
weak or negative growth in one or more of the industries we serve, including AEC, manufacturing, and digital media and entertainment markets;
restructuring or other accounting charges and unexpected costs or other operating expenses;
changes in revenue recognition or other accounting guidelines employed by us and/or established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other rule-making bodies;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and the effectiveness of our hedging activity;
failure to achieve and maintain cost reductions and productivity increases;
dependence on and the timing of large transactions;
changes in product mix, pricing pressure or changes in product pricing;
changes in billings linearity;
the ability of governments around the world to adopt fiscal policies, meet their financial and debt obligations, and to finance infrastructure projects;
lower growth or contraction of our maintenance program;
restructuring or other accounting charges and unexpected costs or other operating expenses;
failure to expand our AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT customer base to related design products and services;
our inability to rapidly adapt to technological and customer preference changes, including those related to cloud computing, mobile devices, new computing platforms, and 3D printing;
the timing of the introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
the success of new business or sales initiatives and increasing our portfolio of product suites;initiatives;
the financial and business condition of our reseller and distribution channels;
failure to accurately predict the impact of acquired businesses or to identify and realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, and successfully integrate such acquired businesses and technologies;
perceived or actual technical or other problems with a product or combination of products;
unexpected or negative outcomes of matters and expenses relating to litigation or regulatory inquiries;
increases in cloud services-related expenses;
security breaches and potential financial penalties to customers and government entities;
timing of additional investments in the development of our platform or deployment of our services;
timing of product releases and retirements;
changes in tax laws or regulations, tax arrangements with foreign governments or accounting rules, such as increased use of fair value measures;
changes in revenue recognition or other accounting guidelines employed by us and/or established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other rule-making bodies;
changes in sales compensation practices;
failure to effectively implement our copyright legalization programs, especially in developing countries;
failure to achieve sufficient sell-through in our channels for new or existing products;
renegotiation or termination of royalty or intellectual property arrangements;
interruptions or terminations in the business of our consultants or third-party developers;
the timing and degree of expected investments in growth and efficiency opportunities;
failure to achieve continued success in technology advancements;
catastrophic events or natural disasters;
regulatory compliance costs;
potential goodwill impairment charges related to prior acquisitions;
failure to appropriately estimate the scope of services under consulting arrangements; and
adjustments arising from ongoing or future tax examinations.
We have also experienced fluctuations in financial results in interim periods in certain geographic regions due to seasonality or regional economic or political conditions. In particular, our financial results in Europe during our third quarter are usually affected by a slower summer period, and our Asia PacificAPAC operations typically experience seasonal slowing in our third and fourth quarters.
Our operating expenses are based in part on our expectations for future revenue and are relatively fixed in the short term. Accordingly, any revenue shortfall below expectations has had, and in the future could have, an immediate and significant adverse effect on our profitability. Greater than anticipated expenses or a failure to maintain rigorous cost controls would also negatively affect profitability.
Our business could suffer as a result of risks, costs, charges and chargesintegration risks associated with strategic acquisitions and investments.
We regularly acquire or invest in businesses, software products and technologies that are complementary to our business through acquisitions, strategic alliances or equity or debt investments. For example, in fiscal 2015 we acquired Delcam, a leading supplier of advanced CADCAM and industrial measurement solutions for the manufacturing industry. The risks associated with such acquisitions include, among others, the difficulty of assimilating products, operations and personnel, inheriting liabilities such as intellectual property infringement claims, the failure to realize anticipated revenue and cost projections, the requirement to test and assimilate the internal control processes of the acquired business in accordance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the diversion of management's time and attention. For example, we face risks relating to our fiscal 2017 integration of our Delcam subsidiaries, which previously operated autonomously.
In addition, such acquisitions and investments involve other risks such as:
the inability to retain customers, key employees, vendors, distributors, business partners, and other entities associated with the acquired business;
the potential that due diligence of the acquired business or product does not identify significant problems;
exposure to litigation or other claims in connection with, or inheritance of claims or litigation risk as a result of, an acquisition, including but not limited to, claims from terminated employees, customers, or other third parties;
the potential for incompatible business cultures;
significantsignificantly higher than anticipated transaction or integration-related costs;
potential additional exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates; and
the potential impact on relationships with existing customers, vendors, and distributors as business partners as a result of acquiring another business.
We may not be successful in overcoming such risks, and such acquisitions and investments may negatively impact our business. In addition, such acquisitions and investments have in the past and may in the future contribute to potential fluctuations in our quarterly financial results. These fluctuations could arise from transaction-related costs and charges associated with eliminating redundant expenses or write-offs of impaired assets recorded in connection with acquisitions and investments. These costs or charges could negatively impact our financial results for a given period, cause quarter to quarter variability in our financial results or negatively impact our financial results for several future periods.
Because we derive a substantial portion of our net revenue from a small number of products, including our AutoCAD-based software products and suites,collections, if these products are not successful, our revenue will be adversely affected.
We derive a substantial portion of our net revenue from sales of licenses of a limited number of our products, including AutoCAD software, products based on AutoCAD, which include our suitescollections that serve specific markets and products that are interoperable with AutoCAD. Any factor adversely affecting sales of these products, including the product release cycle, market acceptance, product competition, performance and reliability, reputation, price competition, economic and market conditions and the availability of third-party applications, would likely harm our financial results. During fiscal 20152017 and 2014,2016, combined revenue from our AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products, not including suitescollections (formerly suites) having AutoCAD or AutoCAD LT as a component, represented 16%28%and 24%30%of our total net revenue, respectively.
A breach of security in our products, services or computer systems may compromise the integrity of our products or services, harm our reputation, create additional liability and adversely impact our financial results.
We make significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our source code and computer systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. These threats include but are not limited to identity theft, unauthorized access, DNS attacks, wireless network attacks, viruses and worms, advanced persistent threat (APT), application centric attacks, peer-to-peer attacks, phishing, backdoor trojans, and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. Any of the foregoing could attack our products, services or computer systems. Despite significant efforts to create security barriers to such programs, it is virtually impossible for us to entirely eliminate this risk. Like all software, our software is vulnerable to cyber attacks. In the past, hackers have targeted our software, and they may do so in the future. The impact of cyber attacks could disrupt the proper functioning of our software products or services, cause errors in the output of our customers' work, allow unauthorized access to sensitive, proprietary or confidential information of ours or our customers, and other destructive outcomes. Moreover, as we continue to invest in new lines of consumer products and services we are exposed to increased security risks and the potential for unauthorized access to, or improper use of, the information of our consumer users. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our reputation may suffer, customers may stop buying our products or services, we could face lawsuits and potential liability, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.
We rely on third parties to provide us with a number of operational services, including hosting and delivery and certain of our customer services and other operations. Any interruption or delay in service from these third parties, breaches of security or privacy, or failures in data collection could expose us to liability, harm our reputation, and adversely impact our financial performance.
We rely on hosted computer services from third parties for services that we provide our customers and computer operations for our internal use. As we gather customer data and host certain customer data in third-party facilities, a security breach could compromise the integrity or availability or result in the theft of customer data. In addition, our operations could be negatively affected in the event of a security breach, and we could be subject to the loss or theft of confidential or proprietary information, including source code.
Unauthorized access to this data may be obtained through break-ins, breaches of our secure networks by unauthorized parties, employee theft or misuse, or other misconduct. We rely on a number of third-party suppliers in the operation of our business for the provision of various services and materials that we use in the operation of our business and production of our products. Although we seek to diversify our third-party suppliers, we may from time to time rely on a single or limited number of suppliers, or upon suppliers in a single country, for these services or materials. The inability of such third parties to satisfy our requirements could disrupt our business operations or make it more difficult for us to implement our business strategy. If any of these situations were to occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could be subject to third-party liability, including under data protection and privacy laws in certain jurisdictions, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.
If we are not able to adequately protect our proprietary rights, our business could be harmed.
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright and trademark laws, trade secret protections, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Despite such efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties from time to time have copied aspects of our software products or have obtained and used information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our software products is time-consuming and costly. We are unable to measure the
extent to which piracy of our software products exists and we expect that software piracy will remain a persistent problem, particularly in emerging economies. Furthermore, our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate.
Additionally, we actively protect the secrecy of our confidential information and trade secrets, including our source code. If unauthorized disclosure of our source code occurs, we could potentially lose future trade secret protection for that source code. The loss of future trade secret protection could make it easier for third partiesthird-parties to compete with our products by copying functionality, which could adversely affect our financial performance and our reputation. We also seek to protect our confidential information and trade secrets through the use of non-disclosure agreements with our customers, contractors, vendors and partners. However, it is possible that our confidential information and trade secrets may be disclosed or published without our authorization. If this were to occur, it may be difficult and/or costly for us to enforce our rights, and our financial performance and reputation could be negatively impacted.
We may face intellectual property infringement claims that could be costly to defend and result in the loss of significant rights.
As more software patents are granted worldwide, the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps, we expect that software product developers will be increasingly subject to infringement claims. Infringement or misappropriation claims have in the past been, and may in the future be, asserted against us, and any such assertions could harm our business. Additionally, certain patent holders without products have become more aggressive in threatening and pursuing litigation in attempts to obtain fees for licensing the right to use patents. Any such claims or threats, whether with or without merit, have been and could in the future be time-consuming to defend, result in costly litigation and diversion of resources, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. In addition, such royalty or license agreements, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, which would likely harm our business.
A significant portion
Our maintenance customers have no obligation to attach maintenance to their initial license or renew their maintenance contract after the expiration of their initial maintenance period, which is typically one year. Our customers' attach and renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the overall global economy, the health of their businesses, and the perceived value of the maintenance program. If our customers do not attach maintenance to their initial license or renew their maintenance contract for our products, our maintenance revenue will decline and our financial results will suffer.
In addition, a portion of the growth of our maintenance revenue has typically been associated with growth of the number of licenses that we sell. Any reduction in the number of licenses that we sell, even if our customers' attach rates do not change, will have a negative impact on our future maintenance revenue. This in turn would impact our business and harm our financial results.
We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance contracts, which is predominantly one year, but may also range up to five years. Decreases in maintenance billings will negatively impact future maintenance revenue, however future maintenance revenue will also be impacted by other factors such as the amount, timing, and mix of contract terms of future billings.
From time to time we realign or introduce new business and sales initiatives; if we fail to successfully execute and manage these initiatives, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.
As part of our effort to accommodate our customers' needs and demands and the rapid evolution of technology, we from time to time evolve our business and sales initiatives such as realigning our development and marketing organizations, and expanding our portfolio of suites and our offering of software as a service, and realigning our internal resources in an effort to improve efficiency. We may take such actions without clear indications that they will prove successful, and at times, we have been met with short-term challenges in the execution of such initiatives. Market acceptance of any new business or sales initiative is dependent on our ability to match our customers' needs at the right time and price. Often we have limited prior experience and operating history in these new areas of emphasis. If any of our assumptions about expenses, revenue or revenue recognition principles from these initiatives proves incorrect, or our attempts to improve efficiency are not successful, our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, and our financial results will be negatively impacted.
If we fail to remediate the material weakness identified in our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial and operating reporting may be adversely affected and could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on our stock price.
2015 Form 10-K 23Management first identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting in connection with the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2015. Since that time, management’s remediation activities have included the following:
Table of Contentsenhanced our technical accounting review for complex income tax considerations;
enhanced the design of our income tax controls to include specific activities to ensure proper classification of deferred taxes and calculation of income tax expense;
supplemented our accounting and tax professionals with the engagement of an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist us in the technical review regarding the application of tax rules around deferred tax assets and liabilities; and
reorganized the structure of our tax function to enhance the level of documentation, technical oversight, and review.
Management has enhanced its controls to include refinements and improvements to controls over the accounting for income taxes. While significant progress has been made as of January 31, 2017, management does not believe these controls are operating effectively. As a result, management does not believe that the material weakness has been remediated and will continue to enhance its controls over the accounting for income tax expense.
There can be no assurance that our remedial measures will be sufficient to address the material weakness or that our internal control over financial reporting will not be subject to additional material weaknesses in the future. If the remedial measures that we take are insufficient to address our material weakness or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future, our Consolidated Financial Statements may contain material misstatements, and we could be required to restate our financial results. Additionally, we may encounter problems or delays in implementing any changes necessary for management to make a favorable assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in our financial reports and the price of our common stock could decline.
Net revenue, billings, earnings or subscriptions shortfalls or the volatility of the market generally may cause the market price of our stock to decline.
The market price for our common stock has experienced significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate significantly. The market price for our common stock may be affected by a number of factors, including the other factors described in this Part I,, Item 1A and the following:
shortfalls in our expected financial results, including net revenue, billings,annualized recurring revenue, earnings, subscriptions, or other key performance metrics;
results and future projections related to our business model transition, including the impact of the end of upgrades and perpetual licenses;transition;
quarterly variations in our or our competitors' results of operations;
general socio-economic, political or market conditions;
changes in estimates of future results or recommendations or confusion on the part of analysts and investors about the short-term and long-term impact to our business resulting from our business model transition;
uncertainty about certain governments' abilities to repay debt or effect fiscal policy;
the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
unusual events such as significant acquisitions, divestitures, regulatory actions, and litigation;
changes in laws, rules, or regulations applicable to our business;
outstanding debt service obligations; and
other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance, such as instability affecting the economy or the operating performance of our competitors.
Significant changes in the price of our common stock could expose us to additional costly and time-consuming litigation. Historically, after periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, a company becomes more susceptible to securities class action litigation. This type of litigation is often expensive and diverts management's attention and resources.
Our CEO transition may cause uncertainty regarding the future of our business and impact employee hiring and retention.
Carl Bass resigned as our President and CEO effective February 8, 2017 after having held such positions for over ten years. In connection with Mr. Bass’ resignation, the Board has instituted a CEO search to consider candidates inside and outside Autodesk and has formed an Interim Office of the Chief Executive to oversee the company’s day-to-day operations. The CEO transition, and any related speculation and uncertainty regarding our future business strategy and direction in connection with the search and the appointment of a permanent CEO, may cause or result in:
disruption of our business and to our relationships with our customers and employees;
distraction of our employees and management;
difficulty recruiting, hiring, motivating and retaining talented and skilled personnel, including a permanent CEO; and
increased stock price volatility.
Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to attract and retain key personnel.
Our success and ability to invest and grow depend largely on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, professional, managerial, sales, and marketing personnel. Historically, competition for these key personnel has been intense. The loss of services of any of our key personnel (including key personnel joining our company through acquisitions), the inability to retain and attract qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineering and sales personnel, could make it difficult to meet key objectives, such as timely and effective product introductions and financial goals.
Changes in laws and/or regulations related to the Internet or related to privacy and data security concerns may impact our business or expose us to increased liability.
The future success of our business depends upon the continued use of the Internet as a primary medium for commerce, communication, and business applications. Federal, state, or foreign government bodies or agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws or regulations affecting data privacy and the transmission of certain types of content using the Internet. For example, the State of California has adopted legislation requiring operators of commercial websites and mobile applications that collect personal information from California residents to conspicuously post and comply with privacy policies that satisfy certain requirements. Several other U.S. states have adopted legislation requiring companies to protect the security of personal information that they collect from consumers over the Internet, and more states may adopt similar legislation in the future. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission has used its authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to bring actions against companies for failing to maintain adequate security for personal information collected from consumers over the Internet and for failing to comply with privacy-related representations made to Internet users. The U.S. Congress has at various times proposed federal legislation intended to protect the privacy of Internet users and the security of personal information collected from Internet users that would impose additional compliance burdens upon companies collecting personal information from Internet users, and the U.S. Congress may adopt such legislation in the future. The European Union also has adopted various directives regulating data privacy and security and the transmission of content using the Internet involving residents of the European Union, including those directives known as the Data Protection Directive, the E-Privacy Directive, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive, and may adopt similar directives in the future. Several other countries, including Canada and several Latin American and Asian countries, have constitutional protections for, or have adopted legislation protecting, individuals' personal information. Additionally, some federal, state, or foreign governmental bodies have established laws that seek to censor the transmission of certain types of content over the Internet or require that individuals be provided with the ability to permanently delete all electronic personal information, such as the German Multimedia Law of 1997.
Given the variety of global privacy and data protection regimes, it is possible we may find ourselves subject to inconsistent obligations. For instance, the USA Patriot Act is considered by some to be in conflict with certain directives of the European Union. Situations such as these require that we make prospective determinations regarding compliance with conflicting regulations. Increased enforcement of existing laws and regulations, as well as any laws, regulations or changes that may be adopted or implemented in the future, could limit the growth of the use of public cloud applications or communications generally, result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based applications, and require implementation of additional technological safeguards.
Our investment portfolio consists of a variety of investment vehicles in a number of countries that are subject to interest rate trends, market volatility, and other economic factors. If general economic conditions decline, this could cause the credit ratings of our investments to deteriorate, illiquidity in the financial marketplace, and we may experience a decline in interest income and an inability to sell our investments, leading to impairment in the value of our investments.
It is our policy to invest our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in highly liquid instruments with, and in the custody of, financial institutions with high credit ratings and to limit the amounts invested with any one institution, type of security and issuer. However, we are subject to general economic conditions, interest rate trends and volatility in the financial marketplace that can affect the income that we receive from our investments, the net realizable value of our investments (including our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities) and our ability to sell them. In the U.S., for example, the yields on our portfolio securities are very low due to general economic conditions. Any one of these factors could reduce our investment income, or result in material charges, which in turn could impact our overall net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share.
From time to time we make direct investments in privately held companies. The privatelyPrivately held companies in which we investcompany investments are considered inherently risky. The technologies and products these companies have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize, which could result in a loss of all or a substantial part of our initial investment in these companies. The evaluation of privately held companies is based on information that we request from these companies, which is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as U.S. publicly traded companies, and as such, the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and accuracy of the data received from these companies.
A loss on any of our investments may cause us to record an other-than-temporary impairment charge. The effect of this charge could impact our overall net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share. In any of these scenarios, our liquidity may be negatively impacted, which in turn may prohibit us from making investments in our business, taking advantage of opportunities and potentially meeting our financial obligations as they come due.
We are subject to legal proceedings and regulatory inquiries, and we may be named in additional legal proceedings or become involved in regulatory inquiries in the future, all of which are costly, distracting to our core business and could result in an unfavorable outcome, or a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or the trading priceprices for our securities.
We are involved in legal proceedings and receive inquiries from regulatory agencies. As the global economy has changed and our business has evolved, we have seen an increase in litigation activity and regulatory inquiries. Like many other high technology companies, the number and frequency of inquiries from U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies we have received regarding our business and our business practices, and the business practices of others in our industry, have increased in recent years. In the event that we are involved in significant disputes or are the subject of a formal action by a regulatory agency, we could be exposed to costly and time consuming legal proceedings that could result in any number of outcomes. Any claims or regulatory actions initiated by or against us, whether successful or not, could result in expensive costs of defense, costly damage awards, injunctive relief, increased costs of business, fines or orders to change certain business practices, significant dedication of management time, diversion of significant operational resources, or otherwise harm our business. In any of these cases, our financial results, results of operations, cash flows or the trading prices for our securities could be negatively impacted.
Changes in existing financial accounting standards or practices, or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes in existing accounting or taxation rules or practices, new accounting pronouncements or taxation rules, or varying interpretations of current accounting pronouncements or taxation practice could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations or the manner in which we conduct our business. Further, such changes could potentially affect our reporting of transactions completed before such changes are effective.
For example, the U.S.-based Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) is currently working together with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) on several projects to further align accounting principles and facilitate more comparable financial reporting between companies who are required to follow U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) under SEC regulations and those who are required to follow IFRSInternational Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") outside of the U.S. These efforts by the FASB and IASB may result in different accounting principles under GAAP
that may result in materially different financial results for us in areas including, but not limited to principles for recognizing revenue and lease accounting.
Furthermore, in May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. This standard establishes a principle for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also provides guidance on the recognition of costs related to obtaining and fulfilling customer contracts. In August 2015, the FASB subsequently issued ASU 2015-14, which deferred the effectiveness of ASU 2014-09, so that it will now be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The revised effective date for the Company under the new standard will be the beginning of fiscal 2019. We are assessing the impact on our consolidated financial statements, defining our operational requirements, and implementing changes to our policies, procedures and systems. This new standard is both technical and complex, and we expect to incur significant ongoing costs to implement and maintain compliance with this new standard. In addition, there may be greater uncertainty with respect to projecting revenue results from future operations as we work through the new revenue recognition standard.
It is not clear if or when these potential changes in accounting principles may become effective, whether we have the proper systems and controls in place to accommodate such changes and the impact that any such changes may have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 along with any other changes in accounting principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change. Any difficulties in the implementation of new or changed accounting standards including ASU No. 2014-09 could cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations. If our estimates relating to our critical accounting policies are based on assumptions or judgments that change or prove to be incorrect, our operating results could fall below expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price. In addition, as we evolve and change our business and sales models, we are currently unable to determine how these potential changes may impact our new models, particularly in the area of revenue recognition.
We regularly investare investing in resources to update and improve our information technology systems. Should our investments not succeed, or if delays or other issues with new or existing internal technology systems disrupt our operations, our business model transition could be compromised and our business could be harmed.
We rely on our network and data center infrastructure, technology systems and our websites for our development, marketing, operational, support, sales, accounting and financial reporting activities. We are continually investinginvest resources to update and improve these systems and environments in order to meet the growing and evolving requirements of our business and customers. In particular, our transition to cloud-based products and a subscription only business model requires considerable investment in the development of technologies, and back office systems for technical, financial, compliance and sales resources to enable a scalable organization.
Such improvements are often complex, costly and time consuming. In addition, such improvements can be challenging to integrate with our existing technology systems, or uncover problems with our existing technology systems. Unsuccessful implementation of hardware or software updates and improvements could result in disruption in our business operations, loss of revenue, errors in our accounting and financial reporting or damage to our reputation.
Although we believe we currently have adequate internal control over financial reporting, we are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002reputation and any adverse results from such evaluation could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on our stock price.
Pursuant to Section 404, we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. The report contains, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting
is effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by management.
If our management identifies one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and such weakness remains uncorrected at fiscal year-end, we will be unable to assert such internal control is effective at fiscal year-end. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective at fiscal year-end (or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls or concludes that we have a material weakness in our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would likely have an adverse effect oncompromise our business and stock price.model transition.
In preparing our financial statements we make certain assumptions, judgments and estimates that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements, which, if not accurate, may significantly impact our financial results.
We make assumptions, judgments and estimates for a number of items, including the fair value of financial instruments, goodwill, long-lived assets and other intangible assets, the realizability of deferred tax assets and the fair value of stock awards. We also make assumptions, judgments and estimates in determining the accruals for employee related liabilities including commissions, bonuses, and sabbaticals; and in determining the accruals for uncertain tax positions, partner incentive programs, product returns reserves, allowances for doubtful accounts, asset retirement obligations and legal contingencies. These assumptions, judgments and estimates are drawn from historical experience and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from our estimates, and such differences could significantly impact our financial results.
Our financial results could be negatively impacted if our tax positions
We are overturned by tax authorities.subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions.
We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is primarily based on our expected geographic mix of earnings, statutory rates, intercompany transfer pricing,arrangements, including the manner in which we develop, value and license our intellectual property, and enacted tax rules. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions on a worldwide basis. WeWhile we believe our tax positions, including intercompany transfer pricing policies, are consistent with the tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Itbusiness, it is possible that these positions may be overturned by jurisdictional tax authorities and may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate.
Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. Increasingly, governmental tax authorities are scrutinizing corporate tax strategies. Many countries in the European Union, as well as a number of other countries and organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, are actively considering changes to existing tax laws that, if enacted, could increase our tax obligations in many countries where we do business. If U.S. or other foreign tax authorities change applicable tax laws or successfully challenge the manner in which our profits are currently recognized, our overall taxes could increase, and our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely impacted.
We rely on third-partythird party technologies and if we are unable to use or integrate these technologies, our product and service development may be delayed and our financial results negatively impacted.
We rely on certain software that we license from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, and the software may not be appropriately supported, maintained or enhanced by the licensors. The loss of licenses to, or inability to support, maintain and enhance any such software could result in increased costs, or in delays or reductions in product shipments until equivalent software can be developed, identified, licensed and integrated, which would likely harm our business.
Disruptions with licensing relationships and third-partythird party developers could adversely impact our business.
We license certain key technologies from third parties. Licenses may be restricted in the term or the use of such technology in ways that negatively affect our business. Similarly, we may not be able to obtain or renew license agreements for key technology on favorable terms, if at all, and any failure to do so could harm our business.
Our business strategy has historically depended in part on our relationships with third-party developers who provide products that expand the functionality of our design software. Some developers may elect to support other products or may experience disruption in product development and delivery cycles or financial pressure during periods of economic downturn. In particular markets, such disruptions have in the past, and would likely in the future, negatively impact these third-party developers and end users, which could harm our business.
Additionally, technology created by outsourced product development, whether outsourced to third parties or developed externally and transferred to us through business or technology acquisitions, havehas certain additional risks such as effective integration into existing products, adequate transfer of technology know-how and ownership and protection of transferred intellectual property.
As a result of our strategy of partnering with other companies for product development, our product delivery schedules could be adversely affected if we experience difficulties with our product development partners.
We partner with certain independent firms and contractors to perform some of our product development activities. We believe our partnering strategy allows us to, among other things, achieve efficiencies in developing new products and maintaining and enhancing existing product offerings. Our partnering strategy creates a dependency on such independent developers. Independent developers, including those who currently develop products for us in the U.S. and throughout the world, may not be able or willing to provide development support to us in the future. In addition, use of development resources through consulting relationships, particularly in non-U.S. jurisdictions with developing legal systems, may be adversely impacted by, and expose us to risks relating to, evolving employment, export and intellectual property laws. These risks could, among other things, expose our intellectual property to misappropriation and result in disruptions to product delivery schedules.
Our business may be significantly disrupted upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event.
Our business is highly automated and relies extensively on the availability of our network and data center infrastructure, our internal technology systems and our websites. We also rely on hosted computer services from third parties for services that we provide to our customers and computer operations for our internal use. The failure of our systems or hosted computer services due to a catastrophic event, such as an earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, weather event, telecommunications failure, power failure, cyber attack, terrorism, or war, could adversely impact our business, financial results and financial condition. We have developed disaster recovery plans and maintain backup systems in order to reduce the potential impact of a catastrophic event, however there can be no assurance that these plans and systems would enable us to return to normal business operations. In addition, any such event could negatively impact a country or region in which we sell our products. This could in turn decrease that country's or region's demand for our products, thereby negatively impacting our financial results.
If we were required to record an impairment charge related to the value of our long-lived assets, or an additional valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, our results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our long-lived assets are tested for impairment if indicators of impairment exist. If impairment testing shows that the carrying value of our long-lived assets exceeds their estimated fair values, we would be required to record a non-cash impairment charge, which would decrease the carrying value of our long-lived assets, as the case may be, and our results of operations would be adversely affected. Our deferred tax assets include net operating loss, amortizable tax assets and tax credit carryforwards that can be used to offset taxable income and reduce income taxes payable in future periods. Each quarter, we assess the need for a valuation allowance, considering both positive and negative evidence to determine whether all or a portion of the deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. In fiscal 2016 we determined that it was more likely than not that the Company would not realize our U.S. deferred tax assets and established a valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets. We continued to have a full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets in 2017 and increased the amount of the valuation allowance to include deferred tax assets generated in 2017, including deferred tax assets that were established as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-9 in the second quarter of fiscal 2017. Changes in the amount of the valuation allowance could result in a material noncash expense or benefit in the period in which the valuation allowance is adjusted and our results of operations could be materially affected. We will continue to perform these tests and any future adjustments may have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We issued $750.0 million$1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes in a debt offering in December 2012offerings and have an existing $400.0$400.0 million revolving credit facility, and mayexpect to incur other debt in the future, all of which may adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results.
In December 2012,June 2015, we issued 1.95%3.125% notes due DecemberJune 15, 20172020 in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0$450.0 million and 3.6%4.375% notes due DecemberJune 15, 20222025 in an aggregate principal amount of $350.0$300.0 million. In December 2012, we issued 1.95% notes due December 15, 2017 in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million. and 3.6% notes due December 15, 2022 in an aggregate principal amount of $350.0 million. As the December 2017 and December 2022 debt matures, we will have to expend significant resources to either repay or refinance these notes. If we decide to refinance the notes, we may be required to do so on different or less favorable terms or we may be unable to refinance the notes at all, both of which may adversely affect our financial condition.
We also have a $400.0$400.0 million revolving credit facility. As of January 31, 2015,2017, we had no outstanding borrowings on the line of credit. Although we have no current plans to borrow under this credit facility, we may use the proceeds of any future borrowing for general corporate purposes, or for future acquisitions or expansion of our business. Our existing and future levels of indebtedness may adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results by, among other things:
increasing our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions;
requiring the dedication of a greater than expected portion of our expected cash from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of expected cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures and acquisitions; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry.
This credit agreement contains customary covenants that could restrict the imposition of liens on Autodesk’s assets, and restrict the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness or make dispositions of assets if Autodesk fails to maintain the financial covenants. The financial covenants consist of a leverage ratio, and an interest coverage ratio. We are required to comply with the covenants set forth in our senior unsecured notes and revolving credit facility. Our ability to comply with these
covenants may be affected by events beyond our control. If we breach any of the covenants and do not obtain a waiver from the note holders or lenders, then, subject to applicable cure periods, any outstanding indebtedness may be declared immediately due and payable. As a result of the business model transition, the leverage ratio requirement of the credit agreement was waived during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Autodesk is discussing amendments to the financial covenants in the credit agreement with the lenders and expects to conclude this process during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. If we are unable to obtain an agreement on modified covenants that the Company can meet during our business model transition, we may cancel this credit agreement, which would decrease our liquidity by $400 million. In addition, changes by any rating agency to our credit rating may negatively impact the value and liquidity of our securities. Under certain circumstances, if our credit ratings are downgraded or other negative action is taken, the interest rate payable by us under our revolving credit facility could increase. Downgrades in our credit ratings could also restrict our ability to obtain additional financing in the future and could affect the terms of any such financing.
| |
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None
We lease 1,873,0001,978,960 square feet of office space in 142133 locations in the United States and internationally through our foreign subsidiaries. In addition, we own 107,000101,225 square feet of office space in sixfour locations internationally through our foreign subsidiaries. Our executive offices and corporate headquarters are located in leased office space in San Rafael, California. Our San Rafael facilities consist of 220,000 square feet under leases that have expiration dates ranging from December 2017 to December 2019. We and our foreign subsidiaries lease additional space in various locations throughout the world for local sales, product development, and technical support personnel.
All facilities are in good condition. Our facilities excluding those in restructuring, are operating at capacities averaging 80%82% occupancy worldwide as of January 31, 20152017. We believe that our existing facilities and offices are adequate to meet our requirements for the foreseeable future. See Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our lease commitments.
We are involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations, and proceedings in the normal course of business activities including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, piracy prosecution, business practices, and other matters. In our opinion, resolution of pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or financial position. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, there is a reasonable possibility that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially affect our results of operations, cash flows, or financial position in a particular period, however, based on the information known by us as of the date of this filing and the rules and regulations applicable to the preparation of our financial statements, any such amount is either immaterial or it is not possible to provide an estimated amount of any such potential loss.
| |
| ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
PART II
| |
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol ADSK. The following table lists the intraday high and low sales prices for each quarter in the last two fiscal years.
| | | | High | | Low | High | | Low |
| Fiscal 2015 | | | | |
| Fiscal 2017 | | | | |
| First Quarter | $ | 58.68 |
| | $ | 44.76 |
| $ | 62.42 |
| | $ | 41.60 |
|
| Second Quarter | 57.59 |
| | 46.09 |
| 61.42 |
| | 49.82 |
|
| Third Quarter | 58.75 |
| | 48.38 |
| 73.40 |
| | 56.80 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | 63.00 |
| | 53.89 |
| 83.96 |
| | 67.15 |
|
| Fiscal 2014 | | | | |
| Fiscal 2016 | | | | |
| First Quarter | $ | 41.42 |
| | $ | 35.51 |
| $ | 65.00 |
| | $ | 53.02 |
|
| Second Quarter | 40.27 |
| | 33.01 |
| 59.42 |
| | 49.50 |
|
| Third Quarter | 42.82 |
| | 34.16 |
| 55.82 |
| | 42.06 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | 54.18 |
| | 40.09 |
| 65.78 |
| | 45.04 |
|
Dividends
We did not declare any cash or stock dividends in either fiscal 20152017 or fiscal 20142016. We anticipate that, for the foreseeable future, we will not pay any cash or stock dividends.
Stockholders
As of January 31, 20152017, the number of common stockholders of record was 479430. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers or other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by the record holders.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Autodesk's stock repurchase program is largely to help offset the dilution from the issuance of stock under our employee stock plans and for such other purposes as may be in the interests of Autodesk and its stockholders, and has the effect of returning excess cash generated from our business to stockholders. The number of shares acquiredshare repurchase program does not have an expiration date and the pace and timing of the purchases are basedrepurchases will depend on several factors including general market conditions,such as cash generation from operations, available surplus, the volume of employee stock option exercises,plan activity, cash requirements for acquisitions, economic and market conditions, stock issuance,price and legal and regulatory requirements. In September 2016, the trading priceBoard of ourDirectors approved a plan which authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 30.0 million shares of the Company's common stock, cash on hand and available in the U.S., and company defined trading windows.stock. As of January 31, 2017, 3.4 million shares have been repurchased under this plan. During the three and twelve months ended January 31, 2015,2017, we repurchased 1.12.9 million and 6.99.7 million shares, respectively, of our common stock.stock under the existing and prior Board of Director authorized share repurchase programs. At January 31, 2015, 14.82017, 26.6 million shares remained available for repurchase under the repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors. This program does not have a fixed expiration date. See Note 9, “Stockholders' Equity,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
The following table provides information about the repurchase of common stock in open-market transactions during the quarter ended January 31, 20152017:
| | | (Shares in millions) | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1) | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1) | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) |
| November 1- November 30 | 0.4 |
| | $ | 59.66 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 15.6 |
| 1.2 |
| | $ | 73.51 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 28.3 |
|
| December 1 - December 31 | 0.4 |
| | 59.98 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 15.1 |
| 0.9 |
| | 75.47 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 27.4 |
|
| January 1 - January 31 | 0.3 |
| | 57.76 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 14.8 |
| 0.8 |
| | 80.01 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 26.6 |
|
| Total | 1.1 |
| | $ | 59.26 |
| | 1.1 |
| | | 2.9 |
| | $ | 75.98 |
| | 2.9 |
| | |
____________________
| |
| (1) | Represents shares purchased in open-market transactions under the stock repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors. |
| |
| (2) | These amounts correspond to the plan approved by the Board of Directors in June 2012September 2016 that authorizes the repurchase of 30.0 million shares. The plan does not have a fixed expiration date. |
Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered securities during the three months ended January 31, 20152017.
Company Stock Performance
The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total return (equal to dividends plus stock appreciation) for our Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, and the Dow Jones U.S. Software Index. The following graph and related information will not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor will such information be incorporated by reference into any filing pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Stockholder Return (1)
___________________
| |
| (1) | Assumes $100 invested on January 31, 2010,2012, in Autodesk’s stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, and the Dow Jones U.S. Software Index, with reinvestment of all dividends. Total stockholder returns for prior periods are not an indication of future investment returns. |
| |
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected consolidated financial data is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. The financial data for the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017 and 20142016 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements that are included in this Form 10-K. The Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations and the Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows data for the year ended January 31, 20132015 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements that are included in this Form 10-K. The Consolidated Balance Sheet data for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20132015 is derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Form 10-K. Theremaining financial data for the fiscal years ended January 31, 20122014 and 20112013 are derived from audited, consolidated financial statements which are not included in this Form 10-K.
| | | | Fiscal year ended January 31, | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (In millions, except per share data) | (In millions, except per share data) |
| For the Fiscal Year: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | $ | 2,312.2 |
| | $ | 2,215.6 |
| | $ | 1,951.8 |
| $ | 2,031.0 |
| | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | $ | 2,312.2 |
|
| Income from operations | 120.7 |
| | 284.8 |
| | 305.9 |
| | 355.6 |
| | 271.4 |
| |
| Net income | 81.8 |
| | 228.8 |
| | 247.4 |
| | 285.3 |
| | 212.0 |
| |
| (Loss) income from operations | | (499.6 | ) | | 1.3 |
| | 120.7 |
| | 284.8 |
| | 305.9 |
|
| Net (loss) income | | (582.1 | ) | | (330.5 | ) | | 81.8 |
| | 228.8 |
| | 247.4 |
|
Cash flow from operations | 708.1 |
| | 563.5 |
| | 559.1 |
| | 573.5 |
| | 540.8 |
| 169.7 |
| | 414.0 |
| | 708.6 |
| | 572.6 |
| | 572.0 |
|
| Common Stock Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic net income per share | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| | $ | 1.09 |
| | $ | 1.25 |
| | $ | 0.93 |
| |
| Diluted net income per share | 0.35 |
| | 1.00 |
| | 1.07 |
| | 1.22 |
| | 0.90 |
| |
| Dividends paid per share | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Basic net (loss) income per share | | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| | $ | 1.09 |
|
| Diluted net (loss) income per share | | (2.61 | ) | | (1.46 | ) | | 0.35 |
| | 1.00 |
| | 1.07 |
|
| At Year End: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 4,913.8 |
| | $ | 4,595.0 |
| | $ | 4,308.4 |
| | $ | 3,227.8 |
| | $ | 2,787.6 |
| $ | 4,798.1 |
| | $ | 5,515.3 |
| | $ | 4,909.7 |
| | $ | 4,589.9 |
| | $ | 4,302.4 |
|
| Long-term liabilities | 1,294.5 |
| | 1,262.0 |
| | 1,221.5 |
| | 390.8 |
| | 308.5 |
| 1,879.1 |
| | 2,304.7 |
| | 1,294.5 |
| | 1,262.0 |
| | 1,221.5 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | 2,219.2 |
| | 2,261.5 |
| | 2,043.2 |
| | 1,882.9 |
| | 1,609.3 |
| 733.6 |
| | 1,619.6 |
| | 2,219.2 |
| | 2,261.5 |
| | 2,043.2 |
|
_______________
| |
| (1) | During the three months ended July 31, 2016, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718)” (“ASU 2016-09”), which addresses among other items, updates to the presentation and treatment of excess tax benefits related to stock based compensation. The Company has adopted changes to the consolidated statements of cash flows on a retrospective basis. The impact for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 to net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities was $0.5 million, $9.1 million, and $12.9 million, respectively. There was no impact to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016. |
| |
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The discussion in our MD&A and elsewhere in this Form 10-K contains trend analyses and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are any statements that look to future events and consist of, among other things, our business strategies, including those discussed in “Strategy” and “Overview of Fiscal 2015” below, anticipated future net revenue, future GAAP and non-GAAP earnings per share, operating margin, operating expenses, billings, other future financial results (by(including by product type and geography) and subscriptions, the effectiveness of our efforts to successfully manage transitions to new business models and markets, our expectations regarding the continued transition of our business model, our ability to increase our subscription base, expected market trends, including the growth of cloud mobile, and socialmobile computing, the effect of unemployment, andthe availability of credit, our expectations for our restructuring, the effects of weakmixed global economic conditions, the effects of revenue recognition, our backlog, expected trends in certain financial metrics, including expenses, the impact of acquisitions and investment activities, expectations regarding our cash needs, the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates and our hedging activities on our financial results, our abilitiesability to successfully expand adoption of our products, our ability to gain market acceptance of new businesses and sales initiatives, our ability to successfully increase sales of product suites as part of our overall sales strategy, and the impact of economic volatility and geopolitical activities in certain countries, particularly emerging economy countries, the timing and amount of purchases under our newly announced stock buy-back plan, and the effects of potential non-cash charges on our financial results and the resulting effect on our financial results. In addition, forward-looking statements also consist of statements involving expectations regarding product capability and acceptance, continuation ofremediation to our stock repurchase program,controls environment, statements regarding our liquidity and short-term and long-term cash requirements, as well as statements involving trend analyses and statements including such words as “may,” “believe,” “could,” “anticipate,” “would,” “might,” “plan,” “expect,” and similar expressions or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are subject to business and economic risks. As such, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of thea number of factors, including those set forth above in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and in our other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made, except as required by law.
Strategy
Autodesk’s vision is to help people imagine, design, and create a better world. We do this by developingAutodesk makes software and services for the world’s designers, architects, engineers, digital artists, professionals, and non-professionals alike—the people who imagine, design, and createmake things. If you've ever driven a high-performance car, admired a towering skyscraper, used a smartphone, or watched a great film, chances are you've experienced what millions of Autodesk customers are doing with our software. Autodesk gives you the world's products, buildings, infrastructure, films, and games. Autodesk serves professional customers in three primary markets: architecture, engineering, and construction; manufacturing; and digital media and entertainment.
Our goal ispower to provide our customers with the world’s most innovative, and engaging design software and services. Our product and services portfolio allows our customers to digitally visualize, simulate, and analyze their projects, helping them to better understand the consequences of their design decisions; save time, money, and resources; and become more innovative.make anything.
Autodesk was founded during the platform transition from mainframesmainframe computers and engineering workstations to personal computers. We developed and sustained a compelling value proposition based upon desktop software for the personal computer. Just as the transition from mainframes to personal computers transformed the industry over 30 years ago, we believe our industry is undergoing a similar transition from the personal computer to cloud, social,mobile, and mobilesocial computing. To address this transition we have accelerated our move to the cloud and mobile devices and are offering more flexible licensing. ForOur product subscriptions presently represent a hybrid of desktop software and cloud-based functionality, which provides a device-independent, collaborative design workflow for designers and their stakeholders. Our cloud service offerings, for example, in fiscal 2014, we began offering Autodesk BIM 360, PLM 360, SimShotgun, Fusion 360, and FusionAutoCAD 360 a few of our cloud based offerings, whichPro, provide tools, including socialmobile and mobilesocial capabilities, to help streamline design, collaboration, and data management processes. We believe that customer adoption of these new offerings will continue to grow as customers across a range of industries begin to take advantage of the scalable computing power and flexibility provided through these new services.
Our strategy is to lead our customers and the industries theywe serve to the new cloudcloud-based technologies and mobile platforms.business models. This entails both a technological shift and a business model shift. During fiscal 2014,As part of the transition, we announced more flexible term-based license offerings, including term-based desktopdiscontinued selling new perpetual licenses of most individual software products effective February 1, 2016, and discontinued selling new perpetual licenses of suites while introducing industry collections effective August 1, 2016. Industry collections allow access to a broad set of products and services that exceeds those previously available in suites - simplifying the customer ability to get access to a complete set of tools for their industry. We now offer subscriptions for certain products.individual products and industry collections, cloud service offerings, and flexible enterprise business agreements ("new model subscription offerings"). These offerings are designed to give our customers even more flexibility with how they use our products and service offerings and address new typesto attract a broader range of customers, such as project-based users and small businesses.
With the discontinuation of the sale of most perpetual licenses, we have accelerated our transition away from selling a mix of perpetual licenses and term-based product subscriptions toward a single subscription model. As parta result of this transition,shift and various other factors described in Note 13, "Segments" in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we have discontinued upgrades effective March 6, 2015. On February 4, 2015, we also announced that new commercial seats of most standalone software products will be available only by desktop subscription beginning February 1, 2016.
Overreassessed the next three years,way we expect to increase our subscription baseallocate resources and customer value, which we believe will help drive billings growth.evaluate financial performance and now operate as a single operating segment. During the transition, revenue, margins, EPS, deferred revenue operating margin, and earnings per sharecash flow from operations have been and will be affectedimpacted as more revenue is recognized ratably rather than up frontupfront and as new product subscription offerings bringgenerally have a wider variety of price points.lower initial purchase price.
For fiscal 2015, our billings increased 18%, as compared to the prior fiscal year. The difference between our 10% year-over-year growth in revenue and our 18% year-over-year growth in billings represents 8 percentage points from the increase in deferred revenue, primarily driven by an increase in subscription billings over the past fiscal year andAs we progress through the business model transition.
At January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2014, our total subscriptions were 2.23 million and 1.85 million, respectively. Subscription additions were led by maintenance subscriptions and benefited from promotional activity driving upgrades and maintenance renewals.
Fortransition, reported revenue is less relevant to measure the past three years, suitessuccess of the business as perpetual license sales have been an importantdiscontinued in favor of subscription offerings, which have considerably lower upfront prices. Annualized recurring revenue ("ARR") and growth area toof subscriptions better reflect business momentum and provide additional transparency into the transition. To further analyze progress, we disaggregate our overall strategy. As our customersgrowth in all industries adopt our design suites, we believe they will experience an increase in their productivitythese metrics between the original maintenance model ("maintenance") and the value of their design data. For fiscal 2015, revenue from suites increased 17%, as compared tonew model subscription offerings. Maintenance subscriptions peaked in the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of revenue, suites increased to 36% in fiscal 2015 as compared to 34% in fiscal 2014.
Another key elementfourth quarter of our growth strategy is increasing our global penetration. Much of the growth in the world’s construction and manufacturing is happening in emerging economies. Further, emerging economies face many of the challenges that our design technology can help address, including infrastructure build-out and innovative design and manufacturing. In fiscal 2015, revenue from emerging economies increased 14% as compared to fiscal 2014 and represented 15% of net revenue for both fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014. While we continue to believe there are long-term growth opportunities in emerging economies, conducting business in these countries presents significant challenges, including economic volatility, geopolitical risk, local competition, limited intellectual property protection, poorly developed business infrastructure, scarcity of talent, software piracy, and different purchase patterns as compared to the developed world.
Today, complex challenges such as globalization, urbanization, and sustainable design are driving our customers to new levels of performance and competitiveness,2016, and we are committedexpect them to helping them address those challenges and take advantage of new opportunities. To achieve these goals, we are capitalizing on two of our strongest competitive advantages: our ability to bring advanced technology to mainstream markets, and the breadth and depth of our product portfolio.decline slowly over time.
We bring powerful newsell our products and services globally, through a combination of indirect and direct channels. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, our indirect channels, which include value added resellers, direct market resellers, distributors, computer manufacturers, and other software developers, were responsible for 72%, 79%, and 83% of our overall revenue, respectively. During the same periods, our direct channels, which include sales resources dedicated to selling in our largest accounts, our highly specialized products, and business transacted through our online Autodesk branded store, were responsible for 28%, 21%, and 17% of our overall revenue, respectively.
We anticipate that our channel mix will continue to change, particularly as we scale our digitally transacted online Autodesk branded store business and our largest accounts shift towards direct-only business models. Importantly, we expect our indirect channel will continue to transact and support the majority of our revenue as we move beyond the business model transition. We employ a variety of incentive programs and promotions to align our direct and indirect channels with our business strategies. In addition, we have a worldwide user group organization and we have created online user communities dedicated to the exchange of information related to the use of our products.
One of our key strategies is to maintain an open-architecture design capabilities to volume markets. Our products are designed to be easy-to-learn and use, and to provide customers with a low cost of deployment, a low total cost of access to our software offerings,products to facilitate third-party development of complementary products and a rapid return on investment. In addition, ourindustry-specific software architecture allowssolutions. This approach enables customers and third parties to customize solutions for extensibility and integration with other products. The breadth of our technology and product line gives us a unique competitive advantage, because it allows our customers to address a wide variety of problems in wayshighly specific uses. We offer several programs that transcend industryprovide strategic investment funding, technological platforms, user communities, technical support, forums, and disciplinary boundaries. This is particularly important in helpingevents to developers who develop add-on applications for our customers addressproducts. For example, we have established the complex challenges mentioned above.Autodesk Spark program to support ideas that push the boundaries of 3D printing and nurture the companies that will advance innovations within 3D printing hardware and software. We have also believecreated the Autodesk Forge program to support innovators that our technological leadershipbuild solutions to facilitate the development of a single connected ecosystem for the future of how things are designed, made, and global brand recognition have positioned us well for long-term growth and industry leadership.used.
In addition to the competitive advantages afforded by our technology, our large global network of distributors, resellers, third-party developers, customers, educational institutions, educators, and students is a key competitive advantage. This network of partners and relationships provides us with a broad and deep reach into volume markets around the world. Our distributor and reseller network is extensive and provides our customers with the resources to purchase, deploy, learn, and support our products quickly and easily. We have a significant number of registered third-party developers who create products that work well with our products and extend them for a variety of specialized applications.
Autodesk is committed to helping fuel a lifelong passion for design in students of all ages. In fiscal 2014, we initiated a new program offeringWe offer free educational licensessubscriptions of Autodesk software worldwide to students, educators, and educational institutions. Targeting both theThrough Autodesk Design Academy, we provide secondary and postsecondary school markets we collaborate with educators, institutions and partners that encourage design learning and furtherhundreds of standards-aligned class projects to support design-based disciplines in Science, Technology, Engineering, Digital Arts, and Math (STEAM) education initiatives.while using Autodesk's professional-grade 3D design, engineering and entertainment software used in industry. We also have made Autodesk Design Academy curricula available on iTunes U. Our intention is to make Autodesk software ubiquitous and the ubiquitous design software of choice for those poised to become the next generation of professional users.
Our strategy includes improving our product functionality and expanding our product offerings through internal development as well as through the acquisition of products, technology, and businesses. Acquisitions often increase the speed at which we can deliver product functionality to our customers; however, they entail cost and integration challenges and may, in certain instances, negatively impact our operating margins. We continually review these trade-offs in making decisions
regarding acquisitions. We currently anticipate that we will continue to acquire products, technology, and businesses as compelling opportunities become available.
Our strategy depends upon a number of assumptions to successfully make the transition toward new cloud and mobile platforms, includingincluding: the related technology and business model shifts; making our technology available to mainstream markets; leveraging our large global network of distributors, resellers, third-party developers, customers, educational institutions, and students; improving the performance and functionality of our products; and adequately protecting our intellectual property. If the outcome of any of these assumptions differs from our expectations, we may not be able to implement our strategy, which could potentially adversely affect our business. For further discussion regarding these and related risks, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we make assumptions, judgments, and estimates that can have a significant impact on amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We base our assumptions, judgments, and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We regularly reevaluate our assumptions, judgments, and estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe that of all our significant accounting policies, the following policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. However, determining whether and when some of these criteria have been satisfied often involves assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on the timing and amount of revenue we report.
For multiple element arrangements containing only software and software-related elements, we allocate the sales price among each of the deliverables using the residual method, under which revenue is allocated to undelivered elements based on our vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value. VSOE is the price charged when an element is sold separately or a price set by management with the relevant authority. If we do not have VSOE of an undelivered software license, we defer revenue recognition on the entire sales arrangement until all elements for which we do not have VSOE are delivered. If we do not have VSOE for undelivered product subscriptions, maintenance or services, the revenue for the arrangement is recognized over the longest contractual service period in the arrangement. We are required to exercise judgment in determining whether VSOE exists for each undelivered element based on whether our pricing for these elements is sufficiently consistent.
For multiple elements arrangements involving non-software elements, including cloud subscription services, our revenue recognition policy is based upon the accounting guidance contained in ASCAccounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605, Revenue Recognition. For these arrangements, we first allocate the total arrangement consideration based on the relative selling prices of the software group of elements as a whole and to the non-software elements. We then further allocate consideration within the software group to the respective elements within that group using the residual method as described above. We exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in each accounting period.
We allocate the total arrangement consideration among the various elements based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its VSOE if available, third-party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available, or the best estimated selling price ("BESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. BESP represents the price at which Autodesk would transact for the deliverable if it were sold regularly on a standalone basis. To establish BESP for those elements for which neither VSOE nor TPE are available, we perform a quantitative analysis of pricing data points for historical standalone transactions involving such elements for a twelve-month period. As part of this analysis, we monitor and evaluate the BESP against actual pricing to ensure that it continues to represent a reasonable estimate of the standalone selling price, considering several other external and internal factors including, but not limited to, pricing and discounting practices, contractually stated prices, the geographies in which we offer our products and services, and the type of customer (i.e. distributor, value-added reseller, and direct end user, among others). We analyze BESP at least annually or on a more frequent basis if a significant change in our business necessitates a more timely analysis or if we experience significant variances in our selling prices.
In situations when we have multiple contracts with a single counterparty, we use the guidance in ASC 985-605 to evaluate both the form and the substance of the arrangements to determine if they should be combined and accounted for as one arrangement or as separate arrangements.
Our assessment of the likelihood of collection is also a critical factor in determining the timing of revenue recognition. If we do not believe that collection is probable, the revenue will be deferred until the earlier of when collection is deemed probable or payment is received.
Our indirect channel model includes both a two-tiered distribution structure, where distributors sell to resellers, and a one-tiered structure where Autodesk sells directly to resellers. Our product licensesubscription revenue from distributors and resellers are generally recognizedcommences recognition at the time titleaccess is provided to our product passes to the distributor, in a two-tiered structure, or reseller, in a one-tiered structure,their customers, provided all other criteria for revenue recognition are met. This policy is predicated on our ability to estimate sales returns, among other criteria. We are also required to evaluate whether our distributors and resellers have the ability to honor their commitment to make fixed or determinable payments, regardless of whether they collect payment from their customers. Our policy also presumes that we have no significant performance obligations in connection with the sale of our product licenses by our distributors and resellers to their customers. If we were to change any of these assumptions or judgments, it could cause a material increase or decrease in the amount of revenue that we report in a particular period.
As part of the indirect channel model, Autodesk haswe have a partner incentive program that uses quarterly attainment of monetary rewards to motivate distributors and resellers to achieve mutually agreed upon business goals in a specified time period. A portion of these incentives reduce license and other revenue in the current period. The remainder, which relates to incentives on our Subscription Program, is recorded as a reduction to deferred revenue in the period the maintenancesubscription transaction is billed and subsequently recognized as a reduction to maintenancesubscription revenue over the contract period. These incentive balances do not require significant assumptions or judgments. TheDepending on how the payments are made, the reserves associated with the partner incentive program are treated on the balance sheet as either contra account receivable (when due to distributors and direct resellers) or accounts payable (when due to indirect resellers).payable.
Marketable Securities.Securities and Privately Held Company Investments. As described in Note 2, “Financial Instruments,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our investments in marketable securities are measured at the end of each reporting period and reported at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In determining the fair value of our investments we are sometimes required to use various alternative valuation techniques. Inputs to valuation techniques are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3 - Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
This hierarchy requires us to minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. This is generally true for our cash and cash equivalents and the majority of our marketable securities, which we consider to be Level 1 assets and Level 2 assets. However, determining the fair value of marketable securities or convertible note investments in privately held companies when observable inputs are not available (Level 3) requires significant judgment. For example, we use probability weighted discounted cash flow models, in which some of the inputs are unobservable in the market, to estimate the fair value of our convertible debt securities. These assumptions are inherently subjective and involve significant management judgment. Whenever possible, we use observable market data and rely on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available, when determining fair value.
All of Autodesk’s marketable securities and privately held company investments are subject to a periodic impairment review. We recognize an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. Autodesk considers various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than Autodesk’s cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and Autodesk’s intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market value.
Business Combinations. We allocate the fair value of the consideration transferred to the assets and liabilities acquired, as well as to in-process research and development based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. Any residual purchase price is recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date with respect to intangible assets and deferred revenue obligations.
Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Examples of critical estimates used in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future include but are not limited to:
future expected cash flows from sales, maintenance agreements, and acquired developed technologies;
the acquired company’scompany's trade name, trademark and existing customer relationshipsrelationship, as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired trade name and customer relationshipstrademark will continue to be used in the combined company’sour product portfolio;
expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed; and
discount rates used to determine the present value of estimated future cash flows.
These estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable, and if different estimates were used the purchase price for the acquisition could be allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities differently from the allocation that we have made. In addition, unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates, and if such events occur we may be required to record a charge against the value ascribed to an acquired asset or an increase in the amounts recorded for assumed liabilities.
Goodwill. When we acquire a business, a portion of the consideration transferred is typically allocated to acquired technology and other identifiable intangible assets, such as customer relationships and developed technology. The excess of the consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition-date fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The amounts allocated to acquired technology and other intangible assets represent our estimates of their fair values at the acquisition date. We amortize the acquired technology and other intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives. The estimation of acquisition-date fair values of intangible assets and their useful lives requires us to make assumptions and judgments, including but not limited to an evaluation of macroeconomic conditions as they relate to our business, industry and market trends, projections of future cash flows, and appropriate discount rates.
We test goodwill for impairment annually in our fourth fiscal quarter or sooner should events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. An optional assessment of qualitative factors of impairment (“optional assessment”) can be utilized prior to necessitating a two-step quantitative impairment test. Should the optional assessment be utilized for any given fiscal year, qualitative factors to consider include cost factors; financial performance; legal, regulatory, contractual, political, business, or other factors; entity specific factors; industry and market considerations, macroeconomic conditions, and other relevant events and factors affecting the reporting unit. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.
Under the two-step quantitative impairment test, we use discounted cash flow models that include assumptions regarding projected cash flows. Variances in these assumptions could have a significant impact on our conclusion as to whether goodwill is impaired, or the amount of any impairment charge. Impairment charges, if any, result from instances where the fair values of net assets associated with goodwill are less than their carrying values. As changes in business conditions and our assumptions occur, we may be required to record impairment charges.
For our annual impairment assessment in fiscal 2015, we utilized the optional assessment for Delcam, which has been deemed a separate reporting unit within our Manufacturing ("MFG") operating segment. Based on a review of the qualitative factors described above, we determined that for our Delcam reporting unit it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. As a result, we concluded that performing the two-step impairment test was not necessary for Delcam.
We used the quantitative two-step impairment test for each of our remaining reporting units: Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (“PSEB”), MFG, Architecture, Engineering, and Construction ("AEC"), and Media and Entertainment
(“M&E”). When applying the quantitative two-step impairment test, a discounted cash flow model was used, which included assumptions regarding projected cash flows. Based on this testing, we determined that the fair value was substantially in excess of the carrying value for each of the four reporting units and therefore the goodwill of each reporting unit was not impaired during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.
Realizability of Long-Lived Assets. We assess the realizability of our long-lived assets and related intangible assets, other than goodwill, annually during the fourth fiscal quarter, or sooner should events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values of such assets may not be recoverable. We consider the following factors important in determining when to perform an impairment review: significant under-performance of a business or product line relative to budget; shifts in business strategies which affect the continued uses of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends; and the results of past impairment reviews. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, we assess recoverability of these assets.
We assess recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If impairment indicators were present based on our undiscounted cash flow models, which include assumptions regarding projected cash flows, we would perform a discounted cash flow analysis to assess impairments on long-lived assets. Variances in these assumptions could have a significant impact on our conclusion as to whether an asset is impaired or the amount of any impairment charge. Impairment charges, if any, result in situations where any fair values of these assets are less than their carrying values.
In addition to our recoverability assessments, we routinely review the remaining estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets. Any reduction in the useful life assumption will result in increased depreciation and amortization expense in the quarter when such determinations are made, as well as in subsequent quarters.
We will continue to evaluate the values of our long-lived assets in accordance with applicable accounting rules. As changes in business conditions and our assumptions occur, we may be required to record impairment charges.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the asset and liability approach. Under this method, deferred tax assets, including those related to tax loss carryforwards and credits, and deferred tax liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. We recognize the tax benefit for an uncertain tax position when it meets a more likely than not threshold. We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense.
A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when management cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will be recovered. The valuation allowance is determined by assessing both positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable; such assessment is required on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Significant judgment is required in determining whether the valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence including past operating results and estimates of future taxable income. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we considered cumulative losses in the U.S. arising from the Company’s business model transition as a significant source of negative evidence. Considering this negative evidence and the absence of sufficient positive objective evidence that we would generate sufficient taxable income in the U.S. to realize the deferred tax assets, we determined that it was more likely than not
that the Company would not realize U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets and recorded a valuation allowance on our federal and state deferred tax assets. We continue to have $185.1 milliona full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets in fiscal 2017 and increased the amount of the valuation allowance to include deferred tax assets generated in fiscal 2017, including deferred tax assets that were established as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-9 in the second quarter of fiscal 2017.
As we continually strive to optimize our overall business model, tax planning strategies may become feasible and prudent whereby management may determine that it is more likely than not that the federal and state deferred tax assets will be realized; therefore, we will continue to evaluate the evidence around our ability to utilize our net deferred tax assets as of January 31, 2015, primarily a result of tax credits, net operating losses, and timing differences for reserves, accrued liabilities, stock options, deferred revenue, purchased technologies, and capitalized intangibles, partially offset by the establishment of U.S. deferred tax liabilities on unremitted earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries, and valuation allowances against U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets. We perform a quarterly assessment of the recoverability of these net deferred tax assets and believe that we will generate sufficient future taxable income in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize the net deferred tax assets. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions and other factors, including intercompany transfer pricing adjustments. Any change in future profitability may require material adjustments to these net deferred tax assets, resulting in a reduction in net incomeeach quarter, both in the period when such determination is made. We believe our tax positions, including intercompany transfer pricing policies, are consistent with the tax lawsUS and in theforeign jurisdictions, in which we conduct our business. It is possible that these positions may be challenged by jurisdictional tax authoritiesbased on all available evidence, both positive and may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate.negative.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date fair value of the award, and recognize expense ratably over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. We estimate the fair value of certain stock-based payment awards (including grants of stock options and employee stock purchases related to the employee stock purchase plan) using either the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model or a binomial-lattice model (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation model). To determine the grant-date fair value of our stock-based payment awards, we use a Black-Scholes model or the quoted stock price on the date of grant, unless the awards are subject to market conditions, in which case we use the Monte Carlo simulation model. The Monte Carlo simulation model utilizes multiple input variables to estimate the probability that market conditions will be achieved. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, the risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the award, and expected dividends. The variables used in these models are reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted, as needed. Share-based compensation cost for restricted stock is measured on the closing fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Legal Contingencies. As described in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” and Part II, Item 8, Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we are periodically involved in various legal claims and proceedings. We routinely review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any matter is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we record a liability for the estimated loss. Because of inherent uncertainties related to these legal matters, we base our loss accruals on the best information
available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess our potential liability and may revise our estimates. Such revisions could have a material impact on future quarterly or annual results of operations.
Restructuring Charges and other facility exit costs, net and Accruals. In February 2016, the Board of Directors approved a world-wide restructuring plan (“Fiscal 2017 Plan”) in order to re-balance staffing levels and reduce operating expenses to better align them with the evolving needs of the Company's business. The Company’s restructuring plans include one–time termination benefits as well as certain contractual termination benefits. We record costs associated with exit activities related to restructuring plans in accordance with the ASC Topic 420, Exit or Disposal Obligations. Liabilities for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity are recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred. The timing of associated cash payments is dependent upon the type of exit cost and may extend over a 12-month period. We record restructuring charge liabilities in “Other accrued liabilities,” or "Other liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheet.
Restructuring charges include employee termination costs, facility closure and relocation costs, and contract termination costs. One–time termination benefits are recognized as a liability at estimated fair value when the approved plan of termination has been communicated to employees, unless employees must provide future service, in which case the benefits are recognized ratably over the future service period. Ongoing termination benefits arrangements are recognized as a liability at estimated fair value when the amount of such benefits becomes estimable and payment is probable. For the facility facility-related restructuring charges, we recognize upon exiting all or a portion of a leased facility and meeting cease-use and other requirements. The amount of restructuring charges is based on the fair value of the lease obligation for the abandoned space, which includes a sublease assumption that could be reasonably obtained.
Restructuring charges require significant estimates and assumptions, including sub-lease income and expenses for severance and other employee separation costs. Our estimates involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including future real estate market conditions and our ability to successfully enter into subleases or termination agreements with terms as favorable as those assumed when arriving at our estimates. We monitor these estimates and assumptions on at least a quarterly basis for changes in circumstances and any corresponding adjustments to the accrual are recorded in our statement of operations in the period when such changes are known.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Part II, Item 8, Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on results of operations and financial condition.
Overview of Fiscal 20152017
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | As a % of Net Revenue | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | As a % of Net Revenue | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | As a % of Net Revenue | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | As a % of Net Revenue |
| | | | $ | | % | |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Net Revenue | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 2,031.0 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | (473.1 | ) | | (19 | )% | | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | 100 | % |
| Cost of revenue | 342.1 |
| | 14 | % | | 274.3 |
| | 12 | % | 341.9 |
| | 17 | % | | (28.8 | ) | | (8 | )% | | 370.7 |
| | 15 | % |
| Gross Profit | 2,170.1 |
| | 86 | % | | 1,999.6 |
| | 88 | % | 1,689.1 |
| | 83 | % | | (444.3 | ) | | (21 | )% | | 2,133.4 |
| | 85 | % |
| Operating expenses | 2,049.4 |
| | 82 | % | | 1,714.8 |
| | 75 | % | 2,188.7 |
| | 108 | % | | 56.6 |
| | 3 | % | | 2,132.1 |
| | 85 | % |
| Income from Operations | $ | 120.7 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 284.8 |
| | 13 | % | $ | (499.6 | ) | | (25 | )% | | $ | (500.9 | ) | | * | | $ | 1.3 |
| | — | % |
____________________
| |
| * | Percentage is not meaningful. |
We are undergoing a business model transition in which we have discontinued selling new perpetual licenses for most of our products in favor of new model subscriptions. During the transition, revenue, margins, EPS, deferred revenue and cash flow from operations have been and will be impacted as more revenue is recognized ratably rather than upfront and as new product subscription offerings generally have a lower initial purchase price.
Revenue Analysis
During fiscal 2015,2017, net revenue decreased 19%, as compared to the prior fiscal year, net revenue increased 10%, gross profit increased 9%, and income from operations decreased 58%. Contributingprimarily due to the year over yeara 40% decrease in income from operations during fiscal 2015 was an increase in operating expenses, offset by increases in both subscription revenue and license and other revenue.
We continue to make progress on our business model transition announced in fiscal 2014 with more flexible licenses and service offerings that have ratable revenue streams. As a result, our net revenue for fiscal 2015 excluded approximately $87 million that was deferred as a result of the transition. The $87 million related to flexible licensing arrangements with certain enterprise customers and had a particular impact on license revenue in the Americas and EMEA geographies, as well as our AEC and MFG business segments.
Our business experienced year over year growth in our AEC, MFG, and PSEB segments, many of our major products, particularly our AEC suites, and all of our geographic areas, particularly EMEA. This growth contributed to the year over year increase in both subscription and license and other revenue during fiscal 2015. We also experienced growth in our total subscriptions and billings during fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to promotional activity driving upgrades and maintenance renewals in advanceresulting from the discontinuation of the endsale of upgrades after fiscal 2015.most individual perpetual products as of February 1, 2016, and of new perpetual licenses of suites effective August 1, 2016. The decrease in license and other revenue was partially offset by a 1% increase in subscription revenue, driven by a 39% increase in revenue from our new model subscription offerings, largely offset by a 3% decrease in maintenance revenue.
Income from operations for fiscal 2015 was negatively impacted by increased spend as a resultFurther discussion of the business model transition, the incremental employee costs associated with acquisitions, investments in our move to the cloud, as well as increased spending on other key initiatives.
The reasons fordrivers of these changesresults are discussed below under the heading “Results from Operations.”
Revenue Analysis
Revenue from flagship products represented 48% and 51% of total net revenue during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Revenue from flagship products increased by 2% as compared to the prior fiscal year. Revenue from suites represented 36% and 34% of total net revenue for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively, and increased by 17% compared to the prior fiscal year. Revenue from new and adjacent products represented 16% and 14% of total net revenue during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Revenue from new and adjacent products increased by 24% as compared to fiscal 2014.
We rely significantly upon major distributors and resellers in both the U.S. and international regions, including Tech Data Corporation and its global affiliates (collectively, “Tech Data”). Tech Data accounted for 25%30%, 25%, and 24%25% of our consolidated net revenue during fiscal 2015 and 20142017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. We believe our business is not substantially dependent on Tech Data. Our customers through Tech Data are the resellers and end users who purchase our software licenses and services. Should any of the agreements between Tech Data and us be terminated for any reason, we believe the resellers and end users who currently
purchase our products through Tech Data would be able to continue to do so under substantially the same terms from one of our many other distributors without substantial disruption to our revenue. Consequently, we believe our business is not substantially dependent on Tech Data.
Operating Margin Analysis
Income from operations decreased 58% in fiscal 20152017 due to a $334.6$473.1 million or 20%decrease in revenue (as discussed above) and a $56.6 million increase in our operating expenses and a $67.8 million or 25% increase in cost of revenue, as compared to fiscal 2014. Partially offsetting the increase in our spend was a $238.3 million or 10% increase in net revenue, as compared to the prior fiscal year.2016. Our operating margin decreased to 5%(25)% for fiscal 20152017 from 13%0% for fiscal 2014. The increase in cost of revenue was driven by employee related expenses associated with the business model transition as well as the inclusion of Delcam related costs and an increase in cloud service costs as compared to the prior fiscal year.2016. The increase in operating expenses between fiscal 20152017 and 20142016 was driven by higher employee related costs, primarily due to increased headcountrestructuring charges and higher commissions expense as a result of increased billings. Also impacting the increase in operating expenses during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 was an increase in professional fees related to acquisition and business model transition initiatives.other facility exit costs.
Further discussion regarding the cost of revenue and operating expense activities are discussed below under the heading “Results of Operations.”
Business Model Transition Metrics
In order to help better understand our financial performance during and after the transition, we have introduced several new metrics including recurring revenue, total subscriptions, ARR, and annualized revenue per subscription ("ARPS"). ARR,
ARPS, and recurring revenue are performance metrics and should be viewed independently of revenue and deferred revenue as ARR and ARPS are not intended to be combined with those items. Please refer to the "Glossary of Terms" for further discussion regarding the new metric terminology.
Recurring revenue represents the revenue for the period from our maintenance plans and revenue from our new model subscription offerings, including portions of revenue allocated to license and other revenue for those offerings. It excludes subscription revenue related to education offerings, consumer product offerings, select Creative Finishing product offerings, Autodesk Buzzsaw, Autodesk Constructware, and third party products. Recurring revenue acquired with the acquisition of a business is reported when total subscriptions are captured in our systems and may cause variability in the comparison of this calculation.
The following table outlines our recurring revenue for the fiscal year ended 2017, 2016, and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | | | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | | | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| | | Change compared to
prior fiscal year | | | Change compared to
prior fiscal year | |
| | | $ | | % | | | $ | | % | |
| | (in millions) |
| Subscription revenue | $ | 1,290.0 |
| | $ | 12.8 |
| | 1 | % | | $ | 1,277.2 |
| | $ | 106.4 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 1,170.8 |
|
| Add: License and other revenue from new model subscription offerings (1) | 241.4 |
| | 140.3 |
| | 139 | % | | 101.1 |
| | 69.1 |
| | 216 | % | | 32.0 |
|
| Less: other adjustments (2) | (31.0 | ) | | 0.2 |
| | (1 | )% | | (31.2 | ) | | 16.2 |
| | (34 | )% | | (47.4 | ) |
| Total recurring revenue (3) | $ | 1,500.4 |
| | $ | 153.3 |
| | 11 | % | | $ | 1,347.1 |
| | $ | 191.7 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 1,155.4 |
|
___________________
| |
| (1) | Includes the portion of revenue for new model subscription offerings allocated to license & other revenue within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
| |
| (2) | Other adjustments include subscription revenue related to select Creative Finishing product offerings, Autodesk Buzzsaw, Autodesk Constructware, education offerings, and third party products which are excluded from recurring revenue. |
| |
| (3) | Total recurring revenue as presented does not represent total ARR in the next table, which is the annualized value of our recurring revenue for the trailing three months. |
During fiscal 2017, recurring revenue was 74% of total net revenue as compared to 54% and 46% of total net revenue for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The following table outlines our subscriptions, ARR and ARPS metrics as of fiscal years ended January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at | | (Decrease)/Increase compared to
prior fiscal year |
| (in thousands) | January 31, 2017 | | January 31, 2016 | | | | % |
| Maintenance Subscriptions | 2,020.1 |
| | 2,151.0 |
| | (130.9 | ) | | (6 | )% |
| New Model Subscriptions | 1,087.8 |
| | 427.2 |
| | 660.6 |
| | 155 | % |
| Total Subscriptions | 3,107.9 |
| | 2,578.2 |
| | 529.7 |
| | 21 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | |
| Maintenance ARR | $ | 1,071.3 |
| | $ | 1,121.4 |
| | $ | (50.1 | ) | | (4 | )% |
| New Model ARR | 528.6 |
| | 255.0 |
| | 273.6 |
| | 107 | % |
| Total ARR | $ | 1,599.9 |
| | $ | 1,376.4 |
| | $ | 223.5 |
| | 16 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| (ARR divided by Subscriptions) | | | | | | | |
| Maintenance ARPS | $ | 530 |
| | $ | 521 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | 2 | % |
| New Model ARPS | 486 |
| | 597 |
| | (111 | ) | | (19 | )% |
| Total ARPS | $ | 515 |
| | $ | 534 |
| | $ | (19 | ) | | (4 | )% |
Year-over-year maintenance subscriptions decreased 6% as of January 31, 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of the discontinuation of new perpetual license sales for most individual products at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 and the end of perpetual suites at the end of second quarter of fiscal 2017, partially offset by the addition of approximately 14,000 maintenance subscriptions associated with an acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Year-over-year new model subscriptions increased 155% as of January 31, 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily driven by growth in all new model subscription types, led by product subscription. New model subscriptions also benefited from a promotion aimed at converting legacy non-subscribers, which captured approximately 75,000 additional product subscriptions.
Total ARR increased 16% as of January 31, 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to a 107% increase in New Model ARR driven by growth in all new model subscription types, led by product subscription. ARR growth was negatively impacted by 3 percentage points from the allocation of our market development funds ("MDF").
The 4% decrease in total ARPS was primarily due to a 19% decrease in new model ARPS. The decline in new model ARPS is a result of individual product subscriptions leading the growth in new model subscriptions, which are priced lower than our flexible enterprise business agreements, and in turn, decreases ARPS.
Our ARPS is also declining because of various factors including mix, foreign currency, and the contra-revenue impact of MDF discussed above. Going forward the ARPS calculation will continue to be extremely sensitive to short-term shifts in term-length, geography mix and promotions. We expect to see ARPS fluctuate up or down on a quarterly basis and we do not expect it will increase evenly throughout the year. As we complete our business model transition, we expect all of these impacts to start to stabilize.
Foreign Currency Analysis
We generate a significant amount of our revenue in the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, andJapan, the United Kingdom.Kingdom and Canada. Total net revenue for fiscal 2015 increased 10%2017 decreased 19% on an as reported basis compared to the prior fiscal year, and was negatively impacted by foreign exchange rate changes during fiscal 2015.2017. Had applicable exchange rates from fiscal 20142016 been in effect during fiscal 20152017 and had we excluded foreign exchange hedge gains and losses from both fiscal 20142016 and 20152017 (“on a constant currency basis”), net revenue would have increaseddecreased 12%16% on a constant currency basis compared to the prior fiscal year.
Our total spend, defined as cost of revenue plus operating expenses, during fiscal 20152017 increased 20%1% on an as reported basis as compared to the prior fiscal year. Had applicable exchange rates from fiscal 20142016 been in effect during fiscal 20152017 and
had we excluded foreign exchange hedge gains and losses from both fiscal 20142016 and 20152017, total spend would have increased 21%3% on a constant currency basis compared to the prior fiscal year.
Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar may have a significant effect on net revenue, total spend, and income from operations in future periods. We use foreign currency contracts to reduce the exchange rate effect on a portion of the net revenue and spend of certain anticipated transactions but do not attempt to completely mitigate the impact of fluctuations of such foreign currency against the U.S. dollar.
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Items
At January 31, 20152017, we had $2,299.4 million2.2 billion in cash and marketable securities. We completed fiscal 20152017 with higher deferred revenue and lower accounts receivable balances as compared to the prior fiscal year. Our deferred revenue balance at January 31, 20152017 included $936.8 million of deferred subscription revenue primarily related to customer maintenance contracts,was $1.8 billion, which will be recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the contracts. The term of our maintenancesubscription contracts is typically between one and three years. Our cash flow from operations increased 26%decreased 59% to $708.1$169.7 million as of January 31, 20152017 from $563.5$414.0 million at January 31, 2014.2016. We repurchased 6.99.7 million shares of our common stock for $372.4631.6 million during fiscal 20152017. Comparatively, we repurchased 10.58.5 million shares of our common stock for $423.8458.0 million during fiscal 20142016. Further discussion regarding the balance sheet and cash flow activities are discussed below under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Business OutlookCurrent Period Adjustments
Autodesk's business model is evolving. We continueSubsequent to assess current business offerings including introducing more flexible licensefurnishing preliminary financial statements on Form 8-K on March 2, 2017 for fiscal year 2017, we identified certain adjustments resulting in changes to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and service offeringsConsolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity as reflected in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have ratable revenue streams. The accounting impact of these offeringsadjusted the Income Statement and other business decisions are expected to result in an increase in the percentage of our ratable revenue, making for a more predictable business over time, while correspondingly reducing our upfront perpetual revenue stream. Over time, we expect our business model transition to expand our customer base by eliminating higher up-front licensing costs and providing more flexibility in how customers gain access to and pay for our products. We also expect our traditional perpetual license revenue to decline without a corresponding decrease in expenses over the next 12 to 24 months. In the future, we expect this business model transition will increase our long-term revenue growth rate by increasing total subscriptions and customer value over time.Balance Sheet line items as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except per share) | | As furnished in the March 2, 2017 8-K | | Adjustment | | Adjusted balances as reflected within this 10-K |
| Income Statement | | | | | | |
| Provision for income taxes | | $ | (55.4 | ) | | $ | (2.9 | ) | | $ | (58.3 | ) |
| Net loss | | $ | (579.2 | ) | | $ | (2.9 | ) | | $ | (582.1 | ) |
| Basic net loss per share | | $ | (2.60 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (2.61 | ) |
| Diluted net loss per share | | $ | (2.60 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (2.61 | ) |
| Balance Sheet | | | | | | |
| Short term deferred revenue | | $ | 1,282.8 |
| | $ | (12.7 | ) | | $ | 1,270.1 |
|
| Long term deferred revenue | | $ | 505.2 |
| | $ | 12.7 |
| | $ | 517.9 |
|
We expect net revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2016 will range from $625 million to $645 million, and that GAAP diluted earnings per share will range from $0.01 to $0.06 while non-GAAP diluted earnings per share will range from $0.25 to $0.30. Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share exclude $0.16 related to stock-based compensation expense and $0.08 related to the amortization of acquisition related intangibles, net of tax.
We expect net billings for fiscal 2016 to increase by approximately 3% to 5% compared to fiscal 2015. We expect net revenue for fiscal 2016 to increase by approximately 3% to 5% compared to fiscal 2015, and that GAAP diluted earnings per share will range from $0.10 to $0.25 while non-GAAP diluted earnings per share will range from $1.05 to $1.20. Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share exclude $0.70 related to stock-based compensation expense and $0.25 related to the amortization of acquisition related intangibles, net of tax. Autodesk anticipates fiscal 2016 GAAP operating margin to be approximately 2% to 4% and non-GAAP operating margin to be approximately 13% to 15%. The non-GAAP operating margin excludes 8 percentage points related to stock-based compensation expense and 3 percentage points related to the amortization of acquisition related intangibles, net of tax. Autodesk expects to add approximately 375,000 to 425,000 net new subscriptions in fiscal 2016.
We remain diligent about managing our spend while making essential investments to drive growth. If we are unable to successfully achieve our major business initiatives we may not achieve our financial goals.
Results of Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 |
| | | |
| | $ | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | (in millions) |
| Net Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| License and other (1) | $ | 1,341.4 |
| | $ | 86.5 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 1,254.9 |
| | $ | (109.2 | ) | | (8 | )% | | $ | 1,364.1 |
|
| Subscription (1) | 1,170.8 |
| | 151.8 |
| | 15 | % | | 1,019.0 |
| | 70.9 |
| | 7 | % | | 948.1 |
|
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 238.3 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | $ | (38.3 | ) | | (2 | )% | | $ | 2,312.2 |
|
| Net Revenue by Geographic Area: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Americas | $ | 898.0 |
| | $ | 79.1 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 818.9 |
| | $ | (17.3 | ) | | (2 | )% | | $ | 836.2 |
|
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa | 980.0 |
| | 128.2 |
| | 15 | % | | 851.8 |
| | (16.7 | ) | | (2 | )% | | 868.5 |
|
| Asia Pacific | 634.2 |
| | 31.0 |
| | 5 | % | | 603.2 |
| | (4.3 | ) | | (1 | )% | | 607.5 |
|
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 238.3 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | $ | (38.3 | ) | | (2 | )% | | $ | 2,312.2 |
|
| Net Revenue by Operating Segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (1) | $ | 872.6 |
| | $ | 142.0 |
| | 19 | % | | $ | 730.6 |
| | $ | 29.5 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 701.1 |
|
| Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (1) | 796.7 |
| | 7.5 |
| | 1 | % | | 789.2 |
| | (53.8 | ) | | (6 | )% | | 843.0 |
|
| Manufacturing (1) | 675.6 |
| | 96.2 |
| | 17 | % | | 579.4 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 1 | % | | 573.8 |
|
| Media and Entertainment (1) | 167.3 |
| | (7.4 | ) | | (4 | )% | | 174.7 |
| | (19.6 | ) | | (10 | )% | | 194.3 |
|
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 238.3 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | $ | (38.3 | ) | | (2 | )% | | $ | 2,312.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| | | |
| | $ | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | (in millions) |
| Net Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subscription | $ | 1,290.0 |
| | $ | 12.8 |
| | 1 | % | | $ | 1,277.2 |
| | $ | 106.4 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 1,170.8 |
|
| License and other | 741.0 |
| | (485.9 | ) | | (40 | )% | | 1,226.9 |
| | (114.5 | ) | | (9 | )% | | 1,341.4 |
|
| | $ | 2,031.0 |
| | $ | (473.1 | ) | | (19 | )% | | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | $ | (8.1 | ) | | — | % | | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
| Net Revenue by Product Family: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Architecture, Engineering, and Construction | $ | 880.9 |
| | $ | (68.2 | ) | | (7 | )% | | $ | 949.1 |
| | $ | 76.5 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 872.6 |
|
| Manufacturing | 625.8 |
| | (98.8 | ) | | (14 | )% | | 724.6 |
| | 49.0 |
| | 7 | % | | 675.6 |
|
| AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT (1) | 326.7 |
| | (268.1 | ) | | (45 | )% | | 594.8 |
| | (100.3 | ) | | (14 | )% | | 695.1 |
|
| Media and Entertainment | 138.9 |
| | (21.1 | ) | | (13 | )% | | 160.0 |
| | (7.3 | ) | | (4 | )% | | 167.3 |
|
| Other (1) | 58.7 |
| | (16.9 | ) | | (22 | )% | | 75.6 |
| | (26.0 | ) | | (26 | )% | | 101.6 |
|
| | $ | 2,031.0 |
| | $ | (473.1 | ) | | (19 | )% | | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | $ | (8.1 | ) | | — | % | | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | For comparability, the presentation of the balances at January 31, 2013 wasPrior periods have been adjusted to align toconform with current yearperiod's presentation. |
Fiscal 20152017 Net Revenue Compared to Fiscal 20142016 Net Revenue
Certain prior period balancesSubscription Revenue
Our Subscription revenue consists of three components: (1) maintenance plan revenue from our perpetual software products; (2) maintenance revenue from our term-based product subscriptions and flexible enterprise business agreements; and (3) revenue from our cloud service offerings. Our maintenance plan provides our customers with a cost effective and predictable budgetary option to obtain the productivity benefits of our new releases and enhancements when and if released during the term of their contracts. Under our maintenance plan, customers are eligible to receive unspecified upgrades when and if available, and online support. We recognize maintenance plan revenue over the term of the agreements, generally between one and three years. With the discontinuation of our perpetual license sales, we no longer offer new maintenance subscriptions and expect our maintenance subscription revenue to decline over time. Our flexible enterprise business agreements are designed to give our customers increased flexibility with how they use our products and service offerings and to attract a broader range of customers such as project-based users and small businesses. We recognize maintenance revenue from these enterprise agreements ratably over their contract terms. Revenue for our cloud service offerings is recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date our service is made available to customers and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been updatedsatisfied.
Subscription revenue increased 1% during fiscal 2017 as compared to conform with current period presentation.fiscal 2016 primarily due to a 39% increase in new model subscription revenue, partially offset by a 3% decrease in maintenance plan revenue. The 39% increase in new model subscription revenue was primarily attributable to a 186% increase in product subscription revenue and a 28% increase in revenue from flexible enterprise business agreements. The 3% decrease in maintenance plan revenue was attributable to the business model transition, as we expect maintenance plan revenue will slowly decline as perpetual license sales have ended, and customers adopt our new model subscription offerings.
Maintenance revenue from perpetual software products represented 86% and 90% of subscription revenue for the fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. New model subscription revenue represented 14% and 10% of subscription revenue for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
License and Other Revenue
License and other revenue consists of two components: (1) all forms of product license revenue and (2) other revenue. Product license revenue includes software license revenue from the sale of seatperpetual licenses, term-based licenses from our desktop subscriptionproduct subscriptions and flexible enterprise offerings,business agreements, and product revenue for Creative Finishing. Other revenue includes revenue from consulting, training, Autodesk Developers Network and Creative Finishing customer support, and is recognized over time, as the services are performed.
Total License and other revenue increased 7%decreased 40% during fiscal 20152017 as compared to fiscal 2014. This increase was primarily due to a 7% increase in product2016. Product license revenue, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The increase in producta percentage of license and other revenue, was primarily due to an 8% increase in suites revenue82% and an increase of 4% in revenue from our flagship products.
During88% for fiscal 2015, the 7% increase2017 and 2016, respectively. The decrease in product license revenue was due to the business model transition, which led to a 7%63% decrease in revenue from perpetual licenses as we have discontinued selling perpetual seats of most of our product offerings. This decrease was partially offset by a 122% increase in the average netlicense revenue per seat while the number of seats sold remained flatfrom our new model subscription offerings.
Other revenue decreased by 7% during fiscal 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Product license revenue, as a percentage of License and other revenue, was 89% for both fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2015, total other2016. Other revenue represented 11% of license and other revenue,7% and 6% of total net revenue. Other revenue increasedfor fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
There was no backlog at January 31, 2017 compared to $31.4 million at January 31, 2016. Due to the business model transition, we do not expect material backlog in future periods.
Net Revenue by Product Family
Our product offerings are focused in four primary product families: AEC, MFG, AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT (“ACAD”), and M&E. During the business model transition, revenue has been and will be negatively impacted as more revenue is recognized ratably rather than upfront and as new product offerings generally have a lower initial purchase price. As part of the transition, we discontinued selling new perpetual licenses of most individual software products effective February 1, 2016, and discontinued selling new perpetual licenses of suites effective August 1, 2016. These broad impacts are reflected in the drivers below.
Net revenue for AEC product family decreased by 7% during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. This increase is primarily due to a 17% increase in revenue from consulting, partially offset by a 65% decrease in revenue from our education products as a result of our strategic transition to offer free educational licenses of Autodesk software to students, educators, and institutions.
Backlog related to current software license product orders that had not shipped at the end of the fiscal year increased by $20.7 million from $19.7 million at January 31, 2014 to $40.4 million at January 31, 2015. Backlog from current software license product orders that we have not yet shipped consists of orders for currently available licensed software products from customers with approved credit status.
Subscription Revenue
Our Subscription revenue consists of three components: (1) maintenance revenue from our software products; (2) maintenance revenue from our term-based desktop subscription and enterprise offerings; and (3) revenue from our cloud service offerings. Our maintenance program provides our customers of software products with a cost effective and predictable budgetary option to obtain the productivity benefits of our new releases and enhancements when and if released during the term of their contracts. Under our maintenance program, customers are eligible to receive unspecified upgrades when and if available, downloadable training courses, and online support. We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement, which is generally between one and three years. Revenue for our cloud service offerings is recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date our service is made available to customers and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Subscription revenue increased 15% during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 primarily due to a 15% increase in commercial maintenance revenue. The 15% increase in commercial maintenance revenue was due to a 9% increase from net revenue per maintenance seat and a 6% increase from commercial enrollment during the corresponding maintenance contract term. Commercial maintenance revenue represented 96% and 95% of Subscription revenue for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively.
Changes in Subscription revenue lag changes in net billings for subscription contracts because we recognize the revenue from those contracts ratably over their contract terms. Net subscription billings increased 22% during fiscal 20152017 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to an increase15% decrease in maintenance subscription billings.
Our deferred subscription revenue balance at January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2014 was $936.8 million and $789.3 million, respectively, and primarily related to customer maintenance agreements, which will be recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement.
Net Revenue by Geographic Areafrom individual product offerings.
Net revenue in the Americas geography increasedfor MFG product family decreased by 10% as reported and on a constant currency basis14% during fiscal 2015, as compared to the prior fiscal year. This increase was primarily due to a 16% increase in our suites revenue and an 18% increase in our new and adjacent product revenue in this geography during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The increase in this geography was led by the U.S.
Net revenue in the EMEA geography increased by 15% on an as reported basis and 13% on a constant currency basis during fiscal 2015 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This increase was primarily due to a 24% increase in our suites products and a 45% increase in our new and adjacent product revenue in this geography during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The increase in our revenue in this geography was led by Germany and France.
Net revenue in the APAC geography increased 5% on an as reported basis and 11% on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 20152017 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to a 4% increase14% decrease in individual product offerings and a 13% decrease in our flagship products and a 5% increase in our suites products in this geography. Our revenue in this geography during fiscal 2015 benefited from increases in revenue from South Korea and India, partially offset by a decrease in revenue from Japan.MFG suites.
Net revenue in emerging economies increased 14%for ACAD product family decreased by 45% during fiscal 20152017 as compared to the prior fiscal year. As part of the transition to term-based product subscriptions for our individual software products in February 2016, products like AutoCAD and ACAD LT are negatively impacted when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year as revenue is recognized ratably rather than upfront.
Net revenue for M&E product family decreased by 13% during fiscal 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to increasesa 50% decrease in Creative Finishing, as we exited the Creative Finishing hardware business at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.
Net Revenue by Geographic Area
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| | | |
| | $ | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | (in millions) |
| Net Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Americas | $ | 871.9 |
| | $ | (100.9 | ) | | (10 | )% | | $ | 972.8 |
| | $ | 74.8 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 898.0 |
|
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa | 800.4 |
| | (134.2 | ) | | (14 | )% | | 934.6 |
| | (45.4 | ) | | (5 | )% | | 980.0 |
|
| Asia Pacific | 358.7 |
| | (238.0 | ) | | (40 | )% | | 596.7 |
| | (37.5 | ) | | (6 | )% | | 634.2 |
|
| | $ | 2,031.0 |
| | $ | (473.1 | ) | | (19 | )% | | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | $ | (8.1 | ) | | — | % | | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
Net revenue from Indiain the Americas geography decreased by 10% on an as reported basis and Mexico. Revenue from emerging economies represented 15% of total neton a constant currency basis during fiscal 2017, as compared to the prior fiscal year. Net revenue in the Americas attributable to the United States was approximately 85% and 83% for both fiscal 20152017 and 2014.2016, respectively.
International net revenue represented 71%63% and 70%68% of our total net revenue for fiscal 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Net revenue in the Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA") geography decreased by 14% on an as reported basis and 8% on a constant currency basis during fiscal 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Net revenue in the Asia Pacific ("APAC") geography decreased 40% on an as reported basis and 39% on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of the business model transition and continued weakness in Japan.
We believe that international revenue will continue to comprise a majority of our total net revenue. Unfavorable economic conditions in the countries that contribute a significant portion of our net revenue, including in emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India, and China, may have an adverse effect on our business in those countries and our overall financial performance. Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies have significantly affected, and could continue to significantly affect, our financial results for a given period even though we hedge a portion of our current and projected revenue. Additionally, weakWeak global economic conditions that have been characterized by restructuring of sovereign debt, high unemployment, and volatility in the financial markets may impact our future financial results.
Net Revenue by Operating Segment
We Additionally during the business model transition, revenue has been and will be negatively impacted as more revenue is recognized ratably rather than upfront and as new product offerings generally have four reportable segments: AEC, PSEB, MFG, and M&E. Wea lower initial purchase price. This transition has a particular impact to emerging economies as sales of perpetual licenses have no material inter-segment revenue.historically comprised a greater percentage of total emerging economy sales in comparison to mature markets.
Net revenue in emerging economies decreased 38% on an as reported basis and 37% on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 2017 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Revenue from emerging economies represented 11% and 15% of total net revenue for AECfiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Fiscal 2016 Net Revenue Compared to Fiscal 2015 Net Revenue
Discussion has been update to provide comparability to the discussion between fiscal 2017 and 2016.
Subscription Revenue
Subscription revenue increased 9% during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 due to a 7% increase in maintenance plan revenue and a 36% increase in new model subscription revenue. The 36% increase in new model subscription revenue was due to a 38% increase in revenue from flexible enterprise business agreements and a 231% increase in product subscription revenue.
Maintenance plan revenue from perpetual license software products represented 90% and 92% of subscription revenue for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. New model subscription revenue represented 10% and 8% of subscription revenue for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
License and Other Revenue
Total license and other revenue decreased 9% during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015. Product license revenue, as a percentage of license and other revenue, was 88% and 90% for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in product license revenue was led by a 17% decrease in revenue from perpetual licenses, partially offset by a 198% increase in license revenue from our new model subscription offerings.
Other revenue increased by 19%12% during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015. Other revenue represented 6% and 5% of total net revenue for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Backlog related to current software license product orders that had not shipped at the end of the fiscal year decreased by $9.0 million from $40.4 million at January 31, 2015 to $31.4 million at January 31, 2016.
Net Revenue by Geographic Area
Net revenue in the Americas geography increased by 8% as reported and 9% on a constant currency basis during fiscal 2016, as compared to the prior fiscal year. Net revenue in the Americas attributable to the United States was approximately 83% and 82% for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
International net revenue represented 68% and 71% of our total net revenue for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net revenue in the EMEA geography decreased by 5% on an as reported basis and increased 3% on a constant currency basis during fiscal 2016 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Net revenue in the APAC geography decreased 6% on an as reported basis and 1% on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 2016 as compared to the prior fiscal year.
Net revenue in emerging economies decreased 4% on an as reported basis and 2% on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 2016 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to a 31%decreases in revenue from Russia and Brazil, partially offset by an increase in revenue from China. Revenue from emerging economies represented 15% of total net revenue for both fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Net Revenue by Product Family
Net revenue for the AEC product family increased by 9% during fiscal 2016 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to an 8% increase in revenue from our AEC suites, which was primarily driven by Autodesk Building Design Suite and Autodesk Infrastructure Design Suite.
Net revenue for PSEBthe MFG product family increased by 1%7% during fiscal 20152016 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to a 3%78% increase in revenue from our Delcam products as a result of including 12 months of Delcam operating results during fiscal 2016, compared to 10 months during fiscal 2015. Also contributing to the increase in net revenue for MFG during fiscal 2016 was a 12% increase in revenue from our flagship product AutoCAD LT. Revenue from AutoCAD remained flat in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014.Mechanical.
Net revenue for MFG increasedthe ACAD product family decreased by 17%14% during fiscal 20152016 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to the acquisition of Delcam plc ("Delcam"). Also contributing to the increase in net revenue for MFG was a 9% increase26% decrease in revenue from our MFG suites, which was primarily drivenAutoCAD LT. Revenue from AutoCAD decreased by the Autodesk Product Design Suite,4% in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2014.2015.
Net revenue for M&E decreased by 4% during fiscal 20152016 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to an 11%a 21% decrease in revenue from Creative Finishing, andpartially offset by a 2% decrease1% increase in revenue from Animation. The decline in Creative Finishing was marked by a decrease in revenue from Creative Finishing hardware products and by a general decrease in the M&E industry end-market demand, partially offset by a 33%demand. The slight increase in sales of our Creative Finishing hardware products. The decrease in Animation revenue was primarily due to a 20% decrease168% increase in revenue from our M&E suites, which was driven byShotgun product offering as a result of including a full year of Shotgun operating results in fiscal 2016 as compared to six months during fiscal 2015, and a 7% increase in our Autodesk Entertainment Creation Suite,Maya flagship product offerings, partially offset by a 5% increase46% decrease in our flagshipMiddleware product 3ds Max.offerings. M&E revenue is impacted by a general decrease in the M&E industry end-market demand, the planned inclusion of our M&E products in other Autodesk industry suites, and the business model transition as customers are opting for desktop subscription.
Fiscal 2014 Net Revenue Compared to Fiscal 2013 Net Revenuesubscription and flexible enterprise offerings. At the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we exited the Creative Finishing hardware business. This was an immaterial portion of our overall business and comes with substantially lower margins, so we expect that exiting this business will improve our margins within M&E over time.
This discussion has been updated to conform with current period's presentation.Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses
License and Other Revenue
Total License and other revenue decreased 8% during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a 7% decrease in product license revenue as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The decline in product license revenue was primarily due to a decrease of 15% in revenue from our flagship products partially offset by an increase of 10% in our suites products.
During fiscal 2014, the 7% decrease in product license revenue was due to a 21% decrease in the number of seats sold partially offset by a 14% increase in the average net revenue per seat. Product license revenue, as a percentage of License and other revenue, was 89% for both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013.
During fiscal 2014, total other revenue represented 11% of License and other revenue. Other revenue decreased by 11% during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. This decrease is primarily due to a 56% decrease in our education products as a result of our transition to granting no or low-cost software licenses to educational institutions in select regions and to key partners during fiscal 2014, consistent with our strategy.
Backlog related to current software license product orders that had not shipped at the end of the fiscal year decreased by $0.3 million, from $20.0 million at January 31, 2013 to $19.7 million at January 31, 2014.
Subscription Revenue
Subscription revenue increased 7% during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily due to a 9% increase in commercial maintenance revenue. The 9% increase in commercial maintenance revenue was due to a 4% increase from commercial enrollment during the corresponding maintenance contract term and a 5% increase from net revenue per maintenance seat. Commercial maintenance revenue represented 95% and 94% of Subscription revenue for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, respectively.
Net subscription billings remained flat during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to a decline in multi-year maintenance subscriptions partially offset by an increase in billings from suites, which have higher maintenance subscription prices.
Our deferred subscription revenue balance at January 31, 2014 and January 31, 2013 was $789.3 million and $753.1 million, respectively, and primarily related to customer maintenance agreements, which will be recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement.
Net Revenue by Geographic Area
Net revenue in the Americas geography decreased by 2% as reported and on a constant currency basis during fiscal 2014, as compared to the prior fiscal year. This decrease was primarily due to a 13% decrease in our flagship product revenue partially offset by a 14% increase in our suites revenue in this geography during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The decrease in our revenue in this geography was led by Canada and Brazil partially offset by an increase in revenue from the U.S.
Net revenue in the Europe, Middle East, and Africa ("EMEA") geography decreased by 2%, and remained flat on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This decrease was primarily due to a 13% decrease in our flagship products partially offset by a 21% increase in our suites products in this geography during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The decrease in our revenue in this geography was led by Ireland, Sweden, and the Netherlands partially offset by an increase in revenue from Finland and the United Kingdom.
Net revenue in the APAC geography decreased 1% and increased by 5% on a constant currency basis, during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to a 3% decrease in our flagship products partially offset by a 10% increase in our suites products in this geography. Our revenue in this geography during fiscal 2014 was impacted by decreases in revenue from Australia, Japan, and Taiwan, partially offset by an increase in revenue from China.
Net revenue in emerging economies remained flat during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to increases in revenue from Lebanon and China offset by a decrease in revenue from the Russian Federation. Revenue from emerging economies represented 15% and 14% of total net revenue for fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively.
International net revenue represented 70% and 71% of our total net revenue for fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. We believe that international revenue will continue to comprise a majority of our total net revenue.
Net Revenue by Operating Segment
Net revenue for PSEB decreased by 6% during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to a 9% and 4% decrease in revenue from our flagship products, AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT, respectively.
Net revenue for AEC increased by 4% during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to a 31% increase in revenue from our AEC suites, which was primarily driven by Autodesk Building Design Suite and Autodesk Infrastructure Design Suite.
Net revenue for MFG increased by 1% during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to a 9% increase in revenue from our MFG suites, which was primarily driven by the Autodesk Product Design Suite. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenue from our flagship product, AutoCAD Mechanical.
Net revenue for M&E decreased by 10% during fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to a 7% decrease in revenue from Animation and a 17% decrease in revenue from Creative Finishing. The decrease in Animation revenue was primarily due to a 9% decrease in revenue from our flagship product, Maya, and a 16% decrease from our M&E suites, which was driven by our Autodesk Entertainment Creation Suite. The decline in Creative Finishing was marked by a general decrease in M&E industry end-market demand.
Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses
Cost of Revenue
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Increase compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Increase compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| |
| | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subscription | | $ | 151.3 |
| | $ | (4.8 | ) | | (3 | )% | | $ | 156.1 |
| | $ | 22.5 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 133.6 |
|
| License and other | $ | 208.5 |
| | $ | 29.8 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 178.7 |
| | $ | 12.7 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 166.0 |
| 190.6 |
| | (24.0 | ) | | (11 | )% | | 214.6 |
| | 6.1 |
| | 3 | % | | 208.5 |
|
| Subscription | 133.6 |
| | 38.0 |
| | 40 | % | | 95.6 |
| | 23.1 |
| | 32 | % | | 72.5 |
| |
| | $ | 342.1 |
| | $ | 67.8 |
| | 25 | % | | $ | 274.3 |
| | $ | 35.8 |
| | 15 | % | | $ | 238.5 |
| $ | 341.9 |
| | $ | (28.8 | ) | | (8 | )% | | $ | 370.7 |
| | $ | 28.6 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 342.1 |
|
| As a percentage of net revenue | 14 | % | | | | | | 12 | % | | | | | | 10 | % | 17 | % | | | | | | 15 | % | | | | | | 14 | % |
Cost of subscription revenue includes the labor costs of providing product support to our maintenance and new model subscription customers, including allocated IT and facilities costs, shipping and handling costs, professional services fees related to operating our network and cloud infrastructure, depreciation expense and operating lease payments associated with computer equipment, data center costs, salaries, related expenses of network operations, amortization of developed technologies, and stock-based compensation expense.
Cost of subscription revenue decreased 3% during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to lower amortization expense of developed technologies as a result of fewer assets acquired, as well as a decrease in employee related costs from reduced headcount, and lower professional fees. Cost of subscription revenue increased17% during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 primarily due to an increase in cloud and hosting related costs in support of our business model transition, and an increase in employee related costs driven by increased employee headcount and product support costs.
Cost of license and other revenue includes labor costs associated with product setup and fulfillment and costs of fulfilling consulting and training services contracts and collaborative project management services contracts. Cost of license and other revenue also includes stock-based compensation expense, direct material and overhead charges, amortization of purchaseddeveloped technology, allocated IT and facilities costs, professional services fees and royalties. Direct material and overhead charges include the cost of hardware sold (mainly PC-based workstations for Creative Finishing in the M&E segment), costs associated with transferring our software to electronic media,and physical media, packaging materials, and shipping and handling costs.fulfillment.
Cost of license and other revenue increased17%decreased 11% during fiscal 2015,2017 as compared to fiscal 2014,2016, primarily from the acquisition of Delcam and consulting support costs associated with an increased headcount and increaseddue to lower professional fees and employee related costs as a result of reduced headcount. Also contributing to lower costs is the building outelimination of our Creative Finishing hardware business, which we exited in the consulting services offered within customer contracts.fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Cost of license and other revenue increased 8%3% during fiscal 2014,2016, as compared to fiscal 2013,2015, primarily due to an increase in consulting support costs.
Cost of subscription revenue includes the laborhardware related costs of providing product support tofrom our maintenance and cloud subscription customers, including rent and occupancy, shipping and handling costs, professional services feesconsumer related to operating our network infrastructure, including depreciation expense and operating lease payments associated with computer equipment, data center costs, salaries, and related expenses of network operations. Cost of subscription revenue increased 40% during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 primarily due to higher employee-related costs as a result of increased premium support headcount as well asproducts, an increase in cloud services-related expenses. Cost of subscription revenue increased32% during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily due toallocated IT costs, and employee related costs for product support and fulfillment driven by an increase in cloud services-related expenses.headcount, partially offset by a decrease in amortization of developed technology.
Cost of revenue, at least over the near term, is affected by the volume and mix of product sales, mix of physical versus electronic fulfillment, fluctuations in consulting costs, amortization of purchaseddeveloped technology, new customer support offerings, royalty rates for licensed technology embedded in our products and employee stock-based compensation expense.
We expect cost of revenue to increasedecrease in absolute dollars and slightly increase as a percentage of net revenue during fiscal 2016,2018, as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to an increase in costs associated with meeting our major business initiatives.2017.
Marketing and Sales
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Increase compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Decrease compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to
prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| |
| | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Marketing and sales | $ | 998.0 |
| | $ | 155.4 |
| | 18 | % | | $ | 842.6 |
| | $ | (32.9 | ) | | (4 | )% | | $ | 875.5 |
| $ | 1,022.5 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
| | 1 | % | | $ | 1,015.5 |
| | $ | 17.5 |
| | 2 | % | | $ | 998.0 |
|
| As a percentage of net revenue | 40 | % | | | | | | 37 | % | | | | | | 38 | % | 50 | % | | | | | | 41 | % | | | | | | 40 | % |
Marketing and sales expenses include salaries, bonuses, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our marketing and sales employees, the expense of travel, entertainment and training for such personnel, the costs of programs aimed at increasing revenue, such as advertising, trade shows and expositions, and various sales and promotional programs. Marketing and sales expenses also include labor costs ofassociated with sales and order processing,management, sales and dealer commissions, rent and occupancy, andpayment processing fees, the cost of supplies and equipment.equipment, gains and losses on our operating expense cash flow hedges, and allocated IT and facilities costs.
Marketing and sales expenses increased 1% during fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, primarily due to an increase in stock based compensation expense as a result of higher fair market value of awards granted, and an increase in advertising and promotional expense driven by search-engine marketing spend. Offsetting the increase in expense was a decrease in employee-related costs from reduced headcount, and lower professional fees.
Marketing and sales expenses increased18% 2% during fiscal 2016, as compared to fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to an increase in stock based compensation expense as a result of higher employee-relatedfair market value of awards granted, an increase in salaries predominantly driven by increased headcount, and an increase in IT costs from salaries, commissions,allocated to marketing and bonuses as well as advertising and promotional expenses. Marketing andsales. Partially offsetting the increase in expense was a decrease in sales expenses decreased4% during fiscal 2014, as compared to fiscal 2013, primarily due to lower advertising and promotional expenses and employee-related costs from salaries, bonuses, and commissions.commission expense.
We expect to balance our need to invest in the marketing and sales of our products with our desireexpenses to actively manage our marketing and sales operating expenses. As a result, we expect marketing and sales expense to slightly increase in absolute dollars and slightly decrease as a percentage of net revenue in fiscal 20162018 as compared to fiscal 2015 primarily due to an increase in costs as we work towards meeting our major business initiatives.2017.
Research and Development
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Increase compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Increase compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| |
| | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Research and development | $ | 725.2 |
| | $ | 114.1 |
| | 19 | % | | $ | 611.1 |
| | $ | 11.1 |
| | 2 | % | | $ | 600.0 |
| $ | 766.1 |
| | $ | (23.9 | ) | | (3 | )% | | $ | 790.0 |
| | $ | 64.8 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 725.2 |
|
| As a percentage of net revenue | 29 | % | | | | | | 27 | % | | | | | | 26 | % | 38 | % | | | | | | 32 | % | | | | | | 29 | % |
Research and development expenses, which are expensed as incurred, consist primarily of salaries, bonuses, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for research and development employees, and the expense of travel, entertainment and training for such personnel, rent and occupancy, and professional services such as fees paid to software development firms and independent contractors.contractors, gains and losses on our operating expense cash flow hedges, and allocated IT and facilities costs.
Research and development expenses decreased 3% during fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, primarily due to a decrease in professional fees and employee related costs, partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation expense due to higher fair market value of awards granted.
Research and development expenses increased 19% during fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to an increase in employee-related costs from salaries and bonuses and an increase in professional fees. Research and development expenses increased2%9% during fiscal 20142016, as compared to fiscal 20132015, primarily due to an increase in employee-related costs from salaries and fringe benefits predominantly driven by increased headcount, an increase in IT costs allocated to research and development, and an increase in professional fees partially offset by a decline in stock-basedstock based compensation expense due to a one-time charge associated with the acquisitionhigher fair market value of Socialcam in fiscal 2013.awards granted.
We expect research and development expenseexpenses to increase in absolute dollars but remain consistentand as a percentage of net revenue during fiscal 2016,2018, as compared to fiscal 2015, as we continue to invest in product development in fiscal 2016.2017.
General and Administrative
For comparability, the balances at January 31, 2014 and January 31, 2013, including the table, were adjusted to align to current year presentation, and therefore the discussion has been updated accordingly.
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Increase compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Increase compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| |
| | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| General and administrative | $ | 283.3 |
| | $ | 71.5 |
| | 34 | % | | $ | 211.8 |
| | $ | 5.5 |
| | 3 | % | | $ | 206.3 |
| $ | 287.8 |
| | $ | (5.6 | ) | | (2 | )% | | $ | 293.4 |
| | $ | 10.1 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 283.3 |
|
| As a percentage of net revenue | 11 | % | | | | | | 9 | % | | | | | | 9 | % | 14 | % | | | | | | 12 | % | | | | | | 11 | % |
General and administrative expenses include salaries, bonuses, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our finance, human resources and legal employees, as well as professional fees for legal and accounting services, certain foreign business taxes, gains and losses on our operating expense cash flow hedges, expense of travel, entertainment and training, expense of communication,IT and facilities costs, and the cost of supplies and equipment.
General and administrative expenses decreased 2% from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 primarily due to decreases in bad debt expense and professional fees.
General and administrative expenses increased 34%4% from fiscal 20142015 to fiscal 20152016, primarily due to an increase in employee-related costs from salaries and bonuses and anpredominantly driven by increased headcount. Partially offsetting the increase in professional fees. General and administrative expenses increased3% from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2014, primarily due to an increaseexpense was a decrease in employee-related costs from salaries and fringe benefits in fiscal 2014.certain foreign business taxes.
We expect general and administrative expenseexpenses to increaseremain relatively flat in absolute dollars and slightly increase as a percentage of net revenue during fiscal 2016,2018, as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to an increase in costs associated with supporting our major business initiatives.2017.
Amortization of Purchased Intangibles
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Increase compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Decrease compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| |
| | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | $ | 39.8 |
| | $ | 3.3 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 36.5 |
| | $ | (5.6 | ) | | (13 | )% | | $ | 42.1 |
| $ | 31.8 |
| | $ | (1.4 | ) | | (4 | )% | | $ | 33.2 |
| | $ | (6.6 | ) | | (17 | )% | | $ | 39.8 |
|
| As a percentage of net revenue | 2 | % | | | | | | 2 | % | | | | | | 2 | % | 2 | % | | | | | | 1 | % | | | | | | 1 | % |
Amortization of purchased intangibles increased 9%includes amortization expenses from customer relationships, trade names and other non-current intangible assets acquired through business combinations and asset purchase agreements.
Amortization of purchased intangibles decreased 4% from fiscal 20142016 to fiscal 2017, primarily as a result of the accumulated effects associated with amortization expense of intangible assets purchased over time, including lower amortization expense from intangible assets acquired during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2017, we acquired $14.0 million in intangible assets as compared to $25.2 million acquired in fiscal 2016.
Amortization of purchased intangibles decreased 17% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016, primarily related to the accumulated effects associated with amortization expense of intangible assets purchased over time, including $164.1$25.2 million in assets purchased in fiscal 20152016 as compared to $40.3$86.2 million purchased in fiscal 2014.
Amortization of purchased intangibles decreased 13% from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2014, primarily related to the accumulated effects associated with amortization expense of intangible assets purchased over time, including $40.3 million in assets purchased in fiscal 2014 as compared to $76.9 million purchased in fiscal 2013.2015.
We expect amortization of purchased intangibles expense to decrease in absolute dollars and slightly decreaseremain relatively flat as a percentage of net revenue during fiscal 2016,2018, as compared to fiscal 2015.2017.
Restructuring Charges and Other Facility Exit Costs, Net
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | Decrease compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | Decrease compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | Change compared to prior fiscal year | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 |
| |
| | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % | $ | | % |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Restructuring charges, net | $ | 3.1 |
| | $ | (9.7 | ) | | (76 | )% | | $ | 12.8 |
| | $ | (31.1 | ) | | (71 | )% | | $ | 43.9 |
| |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | $ | 80.5 |
| | $ | 80.5 |
| | * | | $ | — |
| | $ | (3.1 | ) | | (100 | )% | | $ | 3.1 |
|
| As a percentage of net revenue | — | % | | | | | | 1 | % | | | | | | 2 | % | 4 | % | | | | — | % | | | | | | — | % |
____________________
| |
| * | Percentage is not meaningful. |
During fiscal 2014, ourIn February 2016, the Board of Directors approved a world-wide restructuring plan (“Fiscal 2017 Plan”) in order to re-balance staffing levels and reduce operating expenses to better align them with the evolving needs of the Company's business. Under the Fiscal 2017 Plan, we recorded $70.9 million in employee termination benefits, lease termination costs and other exit costs during fiscal 2017. Additionally, during fiscal 2017, we recorded $9.6 million in other facility exit costs not related to the Fiscal 2017 Plan. During fiscal 2015,2016 Autodesk recorded ano restructuring chargecharges. We have substantially completed the actions authorized under all of $3.1 million. Of this amount, $2.5 million was recorded for one-time termination benefitsthe restructuring plans. See Note 15, "Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, and $0.6 million was recorded for facilities-related costs.
During fiscal 2013,net" in the our Board of Directors approved a world-wide restructuring plan in line with the Company's strategy, including its continuing shift to cloud and mobile computing. The approved plan included a reduction in force and the consolidation of certain leased facilities.
See Note 15, “Restructuring Reserves,” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.additional information.
Interest and Other (Expense) Income,Expense, Net
The following table sets forth the components of interest and other income,expense, net:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2013 |
| | (in millions) |
| Interest and investment (expense) income, net | $ | (13.2 | ) | | $ | (9.8 | ) | | $ | 4.9 |
|
| (Loss) gain on foreign currency | (3.9 | ) | | 4.0 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| Loss on strategic investments | (23.3 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | | (4.0 | ) |
| Other income | 2.7 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Interest and other (expense) income, net | $ | (37.7 | ) | | $ | (4.9 | ) | | $ | 4.1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| | (in millions) |
| Interest and investment expense, net | $ | (29.7 | ) | | $ | (33.9 | ) | | $ | (13.2 | ) |
| Loss on foreign currency | (3.3 | ) | | — |
| | (3.9 | ) |
| Gain (loss) on strategic investments | 0.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| | (23.3 | ) |
| Other income | 8.5 |
| | 8.5 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| Interest and other expense, net | $ | (24.2 | ) | | $ | (21.6 | ) | | $ | (37.7 | ) |
Interest and other (expense) income,expense, net, increased $32.8$2.6 million during fiscal 2015,2017, as compared to fiscal 2014,2016, primarily duerelated to a decrease in gains on certain of our privately-held strategic investments and an increase in losses on our privately held strategic investments. Theforeign currency. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest and investments expense, net, that was primarily driven by mark to market gains on deferred compensation plans partially offset by an increase in interest expense resulting from the loss on strategic investments during fiscalJune 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 is primarilyissuance of $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due to other-than-temporary impairments on twoJune 15, 2020 and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our privately held strategic investments and losses on the derivative portion of our strategic investments that are marked-to-market each period.4.375% senior notes due June 15, 2025.
Interest and other (expense) income,expense, net, decreased $9.0$16.1 million during fiscal 2014,2016, as compared to fiscal 2013,2015, the decrease is primarily duerelated to non-recurring settlement gains on certain of our privately-held strategic investments and mark-to-mark gains recognized on the derivative portion on certain of our other privately-held strategic investments during the current fiscal year. Comparatively, we incurred non-recurring impairment losses on certain of our privately-held strategic investments in the same periods in the prior fiscal year. This decrease was offset by an increase in interest expense resulting from the December 2012June 2015 issuance of $400.0$450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.95%3.125% senior notes due DecemberJune 15, 20172020 and $350.0$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.6%4.375% senior notes due DecemberJune 15, 2022. Interest and investment income fluctuates based on average cash, marketable securities and debt balances, average maturities, and interest rates.2025.
Provision for Income Taxes
We account for income taxes and the related accounts under the liability method. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted rates expected to be in effect during the year in which the basis differences reverse.
Income tax expense was $58.3 million and $310.2 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively, relative to a pre-tax loss of $523.8 million and pre-tax income of $20.3 million, respectively, for the same periods. Tax expense for fiscal 2017 consists primarily of foreign tax expense including withholding tax, and tax amortization on indefinite-lived intangibles. Tax expense for fiscal 2016 related to foreign tax expense and the establishment of a $230.8 million valuation allowance against the Company's U.S. federal and remaining state deferred tax assets recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2016. We regularly assess the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. In making that assessment, we consider both positive and negative evidence, whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we considered recent cumulative losses in the U.S. arising from our business model transition as a significant piece of negative evidence and determined that it was more likely than not that the federal and state deferred tax assets would not be realized.
Income tax expense was $310.2 million and $1.2 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively, relative to pre-tax income of $20.3 million and $83.0 million, respectively, for the same periods. Our effective tax rate was 1% and 18% duringexpense increased from fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Our effective tax rate decreased 17 percentage points from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 20152016 due to an increase inthe establishment of a valuation allowance on our U.S. federal and state deferred tax benefits from foreign earnings taxed at different ratesassets in fiscal 2015 compared to2016 recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and increased benefit from research credits, offset in part by lower tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
Our effective tax rate was 18% and 20% during fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our effective tax rate decreased two percentage points from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2014 primarily due to an increase in tax benefits from foreign earnings taxed at different rates in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013, offset in part by lower tax benefits from restructuring and additional tax expense associated with uncertain tax positions and audit assessments.2016.
Our future effective annual tax rate may be materially impacted by the amount of benefits and charges from tax amounts associated with our foreign earnings that are taxed at rates different from the federal statutory rate, research credits, state income taxes, thechanges in valuation allowances, level of profit before tax, impact of stock-based compensation, accounting for uncertain tax positions, business combinations, U.S. Manufacturer's deduction, closure of statute of limitations or settlement of tax audits, changes in valuation allowances and changes in tax laws including possible U.S. tax law changes that, if enacted, could significantly impact how U.S. multinational companies are taxed on foreign subsidiary earnings.taxed. A significant amount of our earnings is generated by our Europe and Asia Pacific subsidiaries. Our future effective tax rates may be adversely affected to the extent earnings are lower
than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory tax rates or we repatriate certain foreign earnings on which U.S. taxes have not previously been provided.
At January 31, 2015,2017, we had non-current foreign net deferred tax assets of $185.1 million. We believe$49.7 million that we will generate sufficientmanagement believes are more likely than not to be realized in future taxable income in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize these assets.years.
For additional information regarding our income tax provision and reconciliation of our effective rate to the federal statutory rate of 35%, see Note 4, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other Financial Information
In addition to our results determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) discussed above, we believe the following non-GAAP measures are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance. For the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, our gross profit, gross margin, (loss) income from operations, operating margin, net (loss) income, diluted net (loss) income per share and diluted earningsshares used in per share calculation on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis were as follows (in millions except for gross margin, operating margin, and per share data):
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | | | (Unaudited) | | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Gross profit | $ | 2,170.1 |
| | $ | 1,999.6 |
| | $ | 2,073.7 |
| $ | 1,689.1 |
| | $ | 2,133.4 |
| | $ | 2,170.1 |
|
| Non-GAAP gross profit | $ | 2,232.2 |
| | $ | 2,049.8 |
| | $ | 2,118.6 |
| $ | 1,743.2 |
| | $ | 2,194.2 |
| | $ | 2,232.2 |
|
| Gross margin | 86 | % | | 88 | % | | 90 | % | 83 | % | | 85 | % | | 86 | % |
| Non-GAAP gross margin | 89 | % | | 90 | % | | 92 | % | 86 | % | | 88 | % | | 89 | % |
| Income from operations | $ | 120.7 |
| | $ | 284.8 |
| | $ | 305.9 |
| |
| Non-GAAP income from operations | $ | 382.4 |
| | $ | 510.5 |
| | $ | 587.9 |
| |
| (Loss) income from operations | | $ | (499.6 | ) | | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 120.7 |
|
| Non-GAAP (loss) income from operations | | $ | (125.5 | ) | | $ | 280.7 |
| | $ | 382.4 |
|
| Operating margin | 5 | % | | 13 | % | | 13 | % | (25 | )% | | — | % | | 5 | % |
| Non-GAAP operating margin | 15 | % | | 22 | % | | 25 | % | (6 | )% | | 11 | % | | 15 | % |
| Net income | $ | 81.8 |
| | $ | 228.8 |
| | $ | 247.4 |
| |
| Non-GAAP net income (1) | $ | 272.3 |
| | $ | 385.6 |
| | $ | 450.0 |
| |
| Diluted earnings per share (2) | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| |
| Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (1) (2) | $ | 1.17 |
| | $ | 1.68 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
| |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (582.1 | ) | | $ | (330.5 | ) | | $ | 81.8 |
|
| Non-GAAP net (loss) income | | $ | (111.0 | ) | | $ | 194.1 |
| | $ | 272.3 |
|
| Diluted net (loss) income per share (1) | | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.35 |
|
| Non-GAAP diluted (loss) income per share (1) | | $ | (0.50 | ) | | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 1.17 |
|
| GAAP diluted weighted average shares used in per share calculation | | 222.7 |
| | 226.0 |
| | 232.4 |
|
| Non-GAAP diluted weighted average shares used in per share calculation | | 222.7 |
| | 230.7 |
| | 232.4 |
|
_______________
| |
| (1) | Effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, Autodesk began excluding gains and losses on strategic investments for purposes of its non-GAAP financial measures. Prior period non-GAAP interest and otherNet (loss) income (expense), net, net income, and earnings per share amounts have been revised to conform to the current period presentation. |
| |
(2)
| Earnings per share were computed independently for each of the periods presented; therefore the sum of the earningsnet (loss) income per share amount for the quarters may not equal the total for the year. |
For our internal budgeting and resource allocation process and as a means to evaluateprovide consistency in period-to-period comparisons, we use non-GAAP measures to supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis. These non-GAAP measures do not include certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. We also use non-GAAP measures in making operating decisions because we believe those measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our earning
potential and performance for management by excluding certain benefits, credits, expenses and charges that may not be indicative of our core business operating results. For the reasons set forth below, we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) they are used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of our business. This allows investors and others to better understand and evaluate our operating results and future prospects in the same manner as management, compare financial results across accounting periods and to those of peer companies and to better understand the long-term performance of our core business. We also use some of these measures for purposes of determining company-wide incentive compensation.
There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. The non-GAAP financial measures included above are limited in value because they exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. In addition, they are subject to inherent limitations as they reflect the exercise of judgments by
management about which charges are excluded from the non-GAAP financial measures. We compensate for these limitations by analyzing current and future results on a GAAP basis as well as a non-GAAP basis and also by providing GAAP measures in our public disclosures. The presentation of non-GAAP financial information is meant to be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or in isolation from, the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. We urge investors to review the reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures included below, and not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.
Reconciliation of GAAP Financial Measures to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
(In millions except for gross margin, operating margin, and per share data):
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | (Unaudited) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Gross profit | $ | 2,170.1 |
| | $ | 1,999.6 |
| | $ | 2,073.7 |
| $ | 1,689.1 |
| | $ | 2,133.4 |
| | $ | 2,170.1 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 8.9 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 5.2 |
| 14.1 |
| | 11.8 |
| | 8.9 |
|
| Amortization of developed technologies | 53.2 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 39.7 |
| 40.0 |
| | 49.0 |
| | 53.2 |
|
| Non-GAAP gross profit | $ | 2,232.2 |
| | $ | 2,049.8 |
| | $ | 2,118.6 |
| $ | 1,743.2 |
| | $ | 2,194.2 |
| | $ | 2,232.2 |
|
| Gross margin | 86 | % | | 88 | % | | 90 | % | 83 | % | | 85 | % | | 86 | % |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 1 | % | | — | % | | — | % | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| Amortization of developed technologies | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % |
| Non-GAAP gross margin | 89 | % | | 90 | % | | 92 | % | 86 | % | | 88 | % | | 89 | % |
| Income from operations | $ | 120.7 |
| | $ | 284.8 |
| | $ | 305.9 |
| |
| (Loss) income from operations | | $ | (499.6 | ) | | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 120.7 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 165.6 |
| | 132.2 |
| | 156.3 |
| 221.8 |
| | 197.2 |
| | 165.6 |
|
| Amortization of developed technologies | 53.2 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 39.7 |
| 40.0 |
| | 49.0 |
| | 53.2 |
|
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | 39.8 |
| | 36.5 |
| | 42.1 |
| 31.8 |
| | 33.2 |
| | 39.8 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 3.1 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 43.9 |
| |
| Non-GAAP income from operations | $ | 382.4 |
| | $ | 510.5 |
| | $ | 587.9 |
| |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | 80.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.1 |
|
| Non-GAAP (loss) income from operations | | $ | (125.5 | ) | | $ | 280.7 |
| | $ | 382.4 |
|
| Operating margin | 5 | % | | 13 | % | | 13 | % | (25 | )% | | — | % | | 5 | % |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 7 | % | | 6 | % | | 7 | % | 11 | % | | 8 | % | | 7 | % |
| Amortization of developed technologies | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % |
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | 2 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| Restructuring charges, net | — | % | | — | % | | 2 | % | |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | 4 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Non-GAAP operating margin | 15 | % | | 22 | % | | 25 | % | (6 | )% | | 11 | % | | 15 | % |
| Net income | $ | 81.8 |
| | $ | 228.8 |
| | $ | 247.4 |
| |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (582.1 | ) | | $ | (330.5 | ) | | $ | 81.8 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 165.6 |
| | 132.2 |
| | 156.3 |
| 221.8 |
| | 197.2 |
| | 165.6 |
|
| Amortization of developed technologies | 53.2 |
|
| 44.2 |
|
| 39.7 |
| 40.0 |
|
| 49.0 |
|
| 53.2 |
|
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | 39.8 |
|
| 36.5 |
|
| 42.1 |
| 31.8 |
|
| 33.2 |
|
| 39.8 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 3.1 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 43.9 |
| |
| Loss on strategic investments (1) | 23.3 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 4.0 |
| |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | 80.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.1 |
|
| (Gain) Loss on strategic investments | | (0.3 | ) | | (3.7 | ) | | 23.3 |
|
| Establishment of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | | — |
| | 230.9 |
| | — |
|
| Discrete tax provision items | (18.7 | ) | | (10.2 | ) | | (26.7 | ) | (2.7 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | (18.7 | ) |
| Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments | (75.8 | ) | | (60.5 | ) | | (56.7 | ) | 100.0 |
| | 17.2 |
| | (75.8 | ) |
| Non-GAAP net income | $ | 272.3 |
| | $ | 385.6 |
| | $ | 450.0 |
| |
| Diluted net income per share (2) | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| |
| Non-GAAP net (loss) income | | $ | (111.0 | ) | | $ | 194.1 |
| | $ | 272.3 |
|
| Diluted net (loss) income per share (1) | | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.35 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 0.71 |
| | 0.57 |
| | 0.67 |
| 1.00 |
| | 0.86 |
| | 0.71 |
|
| Amortization of developed technologies | 0.23 |
| | 0.19 |
| | 0.18 |
| 0.18 |
| | 0.21 |
| | 0.23 |
|
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | 0.17 |
| | 0.16 |
| | 0.18 |
| 0.14 |
| | 0.15 |
| | 0.17 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 0.01 |
| | 0.06 |
| | 0.18 |
| |
| Loss on strategic investments (1) | 0.10 |
| | — |
| | 0.02 |
| |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | 0.35 |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
|
| (Gain) Loss on strategic investments | | — |
| | (0.01 | ) | | 0.10 |
|
| Establishment of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | | — |
| | 1.01 |
| | — |
|
| Discrete tax provision items | (0.08 | ) | | (0.04 | ) | | (0.12 | ) | (0.01 | ) | | — |
| | (0.08 | ) |
| Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments | (0.32 | ) | | (0.26 | ) | | (0.24 | ) | 0.45 |
| | 0.08 |
| | (0.32 | ) |
| Non-GAAP diluted net income per share (2) | $ | 1.17 |
| | $ | 1.68 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
| |
| Non-GAAP diluted (loss) income per share (1) | | $ | (0.50 | ) | | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 1.17 |
|
_______________
_______________
| |
(1) | Effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, Autodesk began excluding gains and losses on strategic investments for purposes of its non-GAAP financial measures. Prior period non-GAAP interest and otherNet (loss) income (expense), net, net income, and earnings per share amounts have been revised to conform to the current period presentation. |
| |
(2)
| Earnings per share were computed independently for each of the periods presented; therefore the sum of the earningsnet (loss) income per share amount for the quarters may not equal the total for the year. |
Our non-GAAP financial measures may exclude the following:
Stock-based compensation expenses. We exclude stock-based compensation expenses from non-GAAP measures primarily because they are non-cash expenses and management finds it useful to exclude certain non-cash charges to assess the appropriate level of various operating expenses to assist in budgeting, planning, and forecasting future periods. Moreover, because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types that companies can use under FASB ASC Topic 718, we believe excluding stock-based compensation expenses allows investors to make meaningful comparisons between our recurring core business operating results and those of other companies.
Amortization of acquisition-related developed technologies and purchased intangibles. We incur amortization of acquisition-related developed technology and purchased intangibles in connection with acquisitions of certain businesses and technologies. Amortization of developed technologies and purchased intangibles is inconsistent in amount and frequency and is significantly affected by the timing and size of our acquisitions. Management finds it useful to exclude these variable charges from our cost of revenues to assist in budgeting, planning, and forecasting future periods. Investors should note that the use of intangible assets contributed to our revenues earned during the periods presented and will contribute to our future period revenues as well. Amortization of developed technologies and purchased intangible assets will recur in future periods.
Goodwill impairment.This is a non-cash charge to write-down goodwill to fair value when there was an indication that the asset was impaired. As explained above, management finds it useful to exclude certain non-cash charges to assess the appropriate level of various operating expenses to assist in budgeting, planning, and forecasting future periods.
Restructuring charges (benefits),and other facility exit costs, net. These expenses are associated with realigning our business strategies based on current economic conditions. In connection with these restructuring actions or other exit actions, we recognize costs related to termination benefits for former employees whose positions were eliminated, and the closure of facilities and cancellation of certain contracts. We exclude these charges because these expenses are not reflective of ongoing business and operating results. We believe it is useful for investors to understand the effects of these items on our total operating expenses.
Loss (gain) on strategic investments. We exclude gains and losses related to our strategic investments from our non-GAAP measures primarily because management finds it useful to exclude these variable gains and losses on these investments in assessing our financial results. Included in these amounts are non-cash unrealized gains and losses on the derivative components and realized gains and losses on the sale or losses on the impairment of these investments. We believe excluding these items is useful to investors because these excluded items do not correlate to the underlying performance of our business and these losses or gains were incurred in connection with strategic investments which do not occur regularly.
Establishment of a valuation allowance on certain net deferred tax assets. This is a non-cash charge to record a valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets. As explained above, management finds it useful to exclude certain non-cash charges to assess the appropriate level of various cash expenses to assist in budgeting, planning, and forecasting future periods.
Discrete tax items. We exclude the GAAP tax provision, including discrete items, from the non-GAAP measure of income, and include a non-GAAP tax provision based upon the projected annual non-GAAP effective tax rate. Discrete tax items include income tax expenses or benefits that do not relate to ordinary income from continuing operations in the current fiscal year, unusual or infrequently occurring items, or the tax impact of certain stock-based compensation. Examples of discrete tax items include, but are not limited to, certain changes in judgment and changes in estimates of tax matters related to prior fiscal years, certain costs related to business combinations, certain changes in the realizability ofability to utilize deferred tax assets or changes in tax law. Management believes this approach assists investors in understanding the tax provision and the effective tax rate related to ongoing operations. We believe the exclusion of these discrete tax items provides investors with useful supplemental information about the Company'sour operational performance.
Income tax effects on the difference between GAAP and non-GAAP costs and expenses. The income tax effects that are excluded from the non-GAAP measures relate to the tax impact on the difference between GAAP and non-GAAP expenses, primarily due to stock-based compensation, amortization of purchased intangibles and restructuring charges (benefits)and other facilities exit costs, net for GAAP and non-GAAP measures.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of cash is from the sale and maintenance of licenses to our products. Our primary use of cash is payment of our operating costs, which consist primarily of employee-related expenses, such as compensation and benefits, as well as general operating expenses for marketing, facilities and overhead costs. In addition to operating expenses, we also use cash to fund our stock repurchase program and invest in our growth initiatives, which include acquisitions of products, technology and businesses. See further discussion of these items below.
At January 31, 20152017, our principal sources of liquidity were cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaling $2,299.4 million2.2 billion and net accounts receivable of $458.9452.3 million. Net of our senior notes, we have cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaling $0.7 billion at January 31, 2017.
In fiscal 2013,June 2015, we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.95% senior notes due December 15, 2017 and $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.6% senior notes due December 15, 2022, (collectively, the "Senior Notes"). As of March 18, 2015, we have $750.0$450.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior3.125% notes due June 15, 2020 and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.375% notes due June 15, 2025. In December 2012, we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.95% notes due December 15, 2017 and $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.6% notes due December 15, 2022 (all four series of notes collectively, the “Notes”). As of March 21, 2017, we have $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding. Our senior notes do not contain any financial covenants. In addition, we have a line of credit facility that permits unsecured short-term borrowings of up to $400.0 million. The credit facility contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and two financial covenants:million with a May 2020 maturity date. As a result of the business model transition, the leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. Therequirement of the credit facility limits our abilityagreement was waived during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Autodesk is discussing amendments to incur additional indebtedness and has certain other restrictions on our activities as definedthe financial covenants in the credit agreement.agreement with the lenders and expects to conclude this process during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. As of January 31, 2015,March 21, 2017, we were in compliance with the credit facility’s covenants. We have no amounts outstanding under the credit facility as of March 18, 2015. The credit facility expires in May 2018.facility. Borrowings under the credit facility and the net proceeds from the offering of the Senior Notes are available for general corporate purposes.
Our cash and cash equivalents are held by diversified financial institutions globally. Our primary commercial banking relationship is with Citigroup and its global affiliates. In addition, Citibank N.A., an affiliate of Citigroup, is one of the lead lenders and agent in the syndicate of our $400.0$400.0 million line of credit.
Our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities decreased to $2.2 billion at January 31, 2017, from $2.8 billion at January 31, 2016, primarily as a result of cash used for repurchases of our common stock (net of stock issuance proceeds), acquisitions including business combinations and technology purchases, and capital expenditures. The decrease in our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities to $2,299.4 million at January 31, 2015 from $2,544.4 million at January 31, 2014 is primarily due towas partially offset by the cash used for acquisitions, including business combination and technology purchases, the repurchase of common stock, and lowergenerated through operations. The cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock as compared to the prior fiscal year. The cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock variesvary based on our stock price, stock option exercise activity and the volume of employee purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESP Plan”). These decreases to cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities are partially offset by an increase in cash generated by operating activities.Plan.
The primary source forof net cash provided by operating activities of $708.1$169.7 million forin fiscal 20152017 was net income$356.8 million of $81.8 million increased by the effect of non-cash expenses totaling $311.5 million associated with depreciation, amortization, accretion, and stock-based compensation. In addition, net cash flow provided by changesthe change in operating assets and liabilities was $296.0and $322.2 million of non-cash expenses, including stock-based compensation expense, and depreciation, amortization and accretion expense, offsetting our net loss of $582.1 million. The primary working capital sources of cash werewas an increase in deferred revenue and accrued compensationa decrease in accounts receivable for fiscal 20152017 compared to fiscal 2014.2016. The primary working capital use of cash was a decrease in other accrued liabilities for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. Our days sales outstanding in trade receivables was 6386 at January 31, 20152017, compared to 6692 at January 31, 2014.2016. The decrease in days sales outstanding primarily relates to improvedchanges in billings linearity. The primary working capital uses of cash were a decrease in income taxes payable and an increase in accounts receivable for fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014.linearity within each comparative period.
At January 31, 2015,2017, our short-term investment portfolio had an estimated fair value of $615.8$686.8 million and a cost basis of $612.3$684.5 million. The portfolio fair value consisted of $258.4 million invested in commercial paper, $148.0$234.5 million invested in corporate debt securities, $101.9$157.3 million invested in certificates of deposit, $37.9$109.2 million invested in commercial paper, $43.4 million invested in municipal securities,$32.3 million invested in U.S. treasury bills, $30.0 million invested in sovereign debt, $19.6 million invested in asset backed securities, and $13.2 million invested in U.S. government agency securities, and $29.3 million invested in municipal securities.
At January 31, 2015, $40.32017, $47.3 million of trading securities were invested in a defined set of mutual funds as directed by the participants in our Deferred Compensation Plan (see Note 6,, “Deferred “Deferred Compensation,,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion).
Long-term cash requirements for items other than normal operating expenses are anticipated for the following: repayment of debt; common stock repurchases; the acquisition of businesses, software products, or technologies complementary to our business; and capital expenditures, including the purchase and implementation of internal-use software applications.
Our strategy includes improving our product functionality and expanding our product offerings through internal development as well as through the acquisition of products, technology, and businesses. Acquisitions often increase the speed at which we can deliver product functionality to our customers; however, they entail cost and integration challenges and, in certain
instances, negatively impact our operating margins. We continually review these trade-offs in making decisions regarding acquisitions. We currently anticipate that we will continue to acquire products, technology, and businesses as compelling opportunities become available. Our decision to acquire businesses or technology is dependent on our business needs, the availability of suitable sellers and technology, and our own financial condition.
Our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities balances are concentrated in a few locations around the world, with substantial amounts held outside of the U.S.United States. As of January 31, 20152017, approximately 81%91% of our total cash or cash equivalents, and marketable securities are located offshorein foreign jurisdictions and that percentage will fluctuate subject to business needs. Certain amounts held outside the U.S. could be repatriatedThere are several factors that can impact our ability to the U.S. (subject to local law restrictions), but under current U.S.utilize foreign cash balances, such as foreign exchange restrictions, foreign regulatory restrictions or adverse tax law, could be subject to U.S. income taxes less applicable foreign tax credits. We have provided for the U.S. income tax liability on foreign earnings, except for foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested outside the U.S.costs. Our intent is that amounts related to foreign earnings permanently reinvested outside the U.S. will remain outside the U.S. and we willUnited States. We expect to meet our U.S. liquidity needs through ongoing cash flows, foreign cash for which U.S. federal income taxes have been provided, external borrowings, or both.a combination. We regularly review our capital structure and consider a variety of potential financing alternatives and planning strategies to ensure we have the proper liquidity available in the locations in which it is needed and to fund our existing stock buyback program with cash that has not been permanently reinvested outside the U.S.needed.
Cash from operations could also be affected by various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to the risks detailed in Part I, Item 1A titled “Risk Factors.” However, based on our current business plan and revenue prospects, we believe that our existing balances, our anticipated cash flows from operations and our available credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital and operating resource expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Our revenue, earnings, cash flows, receivables, and payables are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, for which we have put in place foreign currency contracts as part of our risk management strategy. See Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for further discussion.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant financial contractual obligations at January 31, 20152017 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.
| | | | Total | | Fiscal 2016 | | Fiscal Years 2017-2018 | | Fiscal Years 2019-2020 | | Thereafter | Total | | Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal Years 2019-2020 | | Fiscal Years 2021-2022 | | Thereafter |
| | | | | | (in millions) | | | | | | | | | (in millions) | | | | |
| Notes | $ | 871.6 |
| | $ | 20.4 |
| | $ | 439.8 |
| | $ | 25.2 |
| | $ | 386.2 |
| $ | 1,738.3 |
| | $ | 446.7 |
| | $ | 79.6 |
| | $ | 506.7 |
| | $ | 705.3 |
|
| Operating lease obligations | 222.7 |
| | 54.9 |
| | 87.1 |
| | 48.1 |
| | 32.6 |
| 212.5 |
| | 59.3 |
| | 78.7 |
| | 33.3 |
| | 41.2 |
|
| Purchase obligations | 85.4 |
| | 63.7 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 7.3 |
| | — |
| 166.4 |
| | 75.7 |
| | 90.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Deferred compensation obligations | 40.3 |
| | 5.3 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 4.9 |
| | 25.1 |
| 47.3 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 31.1 |
|
| Pension obligations | 34.3 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 6.4 |
| | 17.5 |
| 37.5 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 19.1 |
|
| Other obligations (1) | 10.8 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 0.8 |
| |
| Asset retirement obligations | | 10.4 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 4.7 |
| | 0.5 |
| | — |
|
Total (2)(1) | $ | 1,265.1 |
| | $ | 148.9 |
|
| $ | 558.9 |
|
| $ | 95.1 |
|
| $ | 462.2 |
| $ | 2,212.4 |
| | $ | 594.2 |
|
| $ | 267.6 |
|
| $ | 553.9 |
|
| $ | 796.7 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | Other obligations include asset retirement obligations. |
| |
(2) | This table generally excludes amounts already recorded on the balance sheet as current liabilities, certain purchase obligations as discussed below, long term deferred revenue, and amounts related to income tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions, since we cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities (see Note 4, “Income Taxes” to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). |
Notes consist of the Senior Notes issued in December 2012. The Senior Notes consist of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.95% senior notes due December 15, 2017 notes2012 and $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.6% senior notes due December 15, 2022.June 2015 described above.
Operating lease obligations consist primarily of obligations for facilities, net of sublease income, computer equipment and other equipment leases.
Purchase obligations are contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services and are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on Autodesk and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations relate primarily to enterprise subscription agreements, IT infrastructure costs, and marketing costs.
Deferred compensation obligations relate to amounts held in a rabbi trust under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. See Note 6, “Deferred Compensation,” in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding this plan.
Pension obligations relate to our obligations for pension plans outside of the U.S. See Note 14, “Retirement Benefit Plans,” in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding these obligations.
Asset retirement obligations represent the estimated costs to bring certain office buildings that we lease back to their original condition after the termination of the lease.
Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of supplies and other goods and services are not included in the table above. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. Our purchase orders are based on our current procurement or development needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of supplies or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements for three months. In addition, we have certain software royalty commitments associated with the shipment and licensing of certain products.
The expected timing of payment of the obligations discussed above is estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different depending on the time of receipt of goods or services or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some obligations.
We provide indemnifications of varying scopes and certain guarantees, including limited product warranties. Historically, costs related to these warranties and indemnifications have not been significant, but because potential future costs are highly variable, we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on our future results of operations.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Autodesk's stock repurchase program is largelyprovides Autodesk with the ability to help offset the dilution from the issuance of stock under our employee stock plans and for such other purposes as may be in the interests of Autodesk and its stockholders,reduce shares outstanding over time, and has the effect of returning excess cash generated from our business to stockholders. Under the share repurchase program, Autodesk may repurchase shares from time to time in open market transactions, privately-negotiated transactions, accelerated share repurchase programs, tender offers, or by other means. The number of shares acquiredshare repurchase program does not have an expiration date and the pace and timing of the purchases are basedrepurchases will depend on several factors including general market conditions,such as cash generation from operations, available surplus, the volume of employee stock option exercises, stock issuance, the trading price of our common stock, cash on hand andplan activity, remaining shares available in the U.S.,authorized pool, cash requirements for acquisitions, economic and company defined trading windows.market conditions, stock price and legal and regulatory requirements.
In September 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 30.0 million shares of the Company's common stock. During the three and twelve months ended January 31, 2015,2017, we repurchased 1.12.9 million and 6.99.7 million shares of our common stock, respectively. At January 31, 2015, 14.82017, 26.6 million shares remained available for repurchase under our currentthe repurchase programprograms approved by the Board of Directors. This program doesThese programs do not have a fixed expiration date. See Note 9,, “Stockholders' Equity,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of January 31, 20152017, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
| |
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Foreign currency exchange risk
Our revenue, earnings, cash flows, receivables, and payables are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our risk management strategy utilizes foreign currency contracts to manage our exposure to foreign currency volatility that exists as part of our ongoing business operations. We utilize cash flow hedge contracts to reduce the exchange rate impact on a portion of the net revenue or operating expense of certain anticipated transactions. In addition, we use balance sheet hedge contracts to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with foreign currency denominated receivables and payables. As of January 31, 20152017 and 20142016, we had open cash flow and balance sheet hedge contracts with future settlements within one to twelve months. Contracts were primarily denominated in euros, Japanese yen, Swiss francs, British pounds, Canadian dollars, and Australian dollars. We do not enter into any foreign exchange derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The notional amount of our option and forward contracts was $381.2640.0 million and $557.2374.0 million at January 31, 20152017 and 20142016, respectively.
We use foreign currency contracts to reduce the exchange rate impact on the net revenue and operating expenses of certain anticipated transactions. A sensitivity analysis performed on our hedging portfolio as of January 31, 20152017 indicated that a hypothetical 10% appreciation of the U.S. dollar from its value at January 31, 20152017 and 20142016 would increase the fair value of our foreign currency contracts by $$60.9 million and 35.1 million and $7.933.3 million, respectively. A hypothetical 10% depreciation of the dollar from its value at January 31, 20152017 and 2016 would decrease the fair value of our foreign currency contracts by $16.532.5 million. A hypothetical 10% depreciation of the dollar from its value at January 31, 2014 would increase the fair value of our foreign currency contracts by and $3.725.6 million., respectively.
Interest rate riskRate Risk
Interest rate movements affect both the interest income we earn on our short term investments and the market value of certain longer term securities. At January 31, 20152017, we had $1,588.7$1,898.9 million of cash equivalents and marketable securities, including $615.8$686.8 million classified as short-term marketable securities and $273.0$306.2 million classified as long-term marketable securities. If interest rates were to move up by 50 or 100 basis points over a twelve month period, the potential decline in fairmarket value onchange of our marketable securities would be $have an unrealized gain or loss of $2.9 million or $and 4.7$5.6 million, respectively.
Other Market Risk
From time to time we make direct investments in privately held companies. The privatelyPrivately held companies in which we investcompany investments generally are considered inherently risky. The technologies and products these companies have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize, which could result in a loss of all or a substantial part of our initial investment in these companies. The evaluation of privately held companies is based on information that we request from these companies, which is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as U.S. publicly traded companies, and as such, the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and accuracy of the data received from these companies. See Note 2, "Financial Instruments" for further discussion regarding our privately held investments.
| |
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
AUTODESK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
| | | | Fiscal year ended January 31, | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subscription | | $ | 1,290.0 |
| | $ | 1,277.2 |
| | $ | 1,170.8 |
|
| License and other | $ | 1,341.4 |
| | $ | 1,254.9 |
| | $ | 1,364.1 |
| 741.0 |
| | 1,226.9 |
| | 1,341.4 |
|
| Subscription | 1,170.8 |
| | 1,019.0 |
| | 948.1 |
| |
| Total net revenue | 2,512.2 |
| | 2,273.9 |
| | 2,312.2 |
| 2,031.0 |
| | 2,504.1 |
| | 2,512.2 |
|
| Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of subscription revenue | | 151.3 |
| | 156.1 |
| | 133.6 |
|
| Cost of license and other revenue | 208.5 |
| | 178.7 |
| | 166.0 |
| 190.6 |
| | 214.6 |
| | 208.5 |
|
| Cost of subscription revenue | 133.6 |
| | 95.6 |
| | 72.5 |
| |
| Total cost of revenue | 342.1 |
| | 274.3 |
| | 238.5 |
| 341.9 |
| | 370.7 |
| | 342.1 |
|
| Gross profit | 2,170.1 |
| | 1,999.6 |
| | 2,073.7 |
| 1,689.1 |
| | 2,133.4 |
| | 2,170.1 |
|
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Marketing and sales | 998.0 |
| | 842.6 |
| | 875.5 |
| 1,022.5 |
| | 1,015.5 |
| | 998.0 |
|
| Research and development | 725.2 |
| | 611.1 |
| | 600.0 |
| 766.1 |
| | 790.0 |
| | 725.2 |
|
| General and administrative | 283.3 |
| | 211.8 |
| | 206.3 |
| 287.8 |
| | 293.4 |
| | 283.3 |
|
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | 39.8 |
| | 36.5 |
| | 42.1 |
| 31.8 |
| | 33.2 |
| | 39.8 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 3.1 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 43.9 |
| |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | 80.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.1 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 2,049.4 |
| | 1,714.8 |
| | 1,767.8 |
| 2,188.7 |
| | 2,132.1 |
| | 2,049.4 |
|
| Income from operations | 120.7 |
| | 284.8 |
| | 305.9 |
| |
| Interest and other (expense) income, net | (37.7 | ) | | (4.9 | ) | | 4.1 |
| |
| Income before income taxes | 83.0 |
| | 279.9 |
| | 310.0 |
| |
| (Loss) income from operations | | (499.6 | ) | | 1.3 |
| | 120.7 |
|
| Interest and other expense, net | | (24.2 | ) | | (21.6 | ) | | (37.7 | ) |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | | (523.8 | ) | | (20.3 | ) | | 83.0 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | (1.2 | ) | | (51.1 | ) | | (62.6 | ) | (58.3 | ) | | (310.2 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
| Net income | $ | 81.8 |
| | $ | 228.8 |
| | $ | 247.4 |
| |
| Basic net income per share | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| | $ | 1.09 |
| |
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| |
| Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per share | 227.1 |
| | 224.0 |
| | 226.4 |
| |
| Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per share | 232.4 |
| | 229.6 |
| | 231.7 |
| |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (582.1 | ) | | $ | (330.5 | ) | | $ | 81.8 |
|
| Basic net (loss) income per share | | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.36 |
|
| Diluted net (loss) income per share | | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.35 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing basic net (loss) income per share | | 222.7 |
| | 226.0 |
| | 227.1 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net (loss) income per share | | 222.7 |
| | 226.0 |
| | 232.4 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AUTODESK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Net income | $ | 81.8 |
| | $ | 228.8 |
| | $ | 247.4 |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of reclassifications: | | | | | |
| Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments (net of tax effect of ($0.7), $1.1, and ($0.5)) | 39.3 |
| | 0.7 |
| | (6.4 | ) |
| Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (net of tax effect of ($0.2), $0.3, and ($0.6)) | (0.2 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | 2.0 |
|
| Change in defined benefit pension items (net of tax effect of $1.8, $0.6, and $0.4) | (16.0 | ) | | 5.4 |
| | (6.1 | ) |
| Net change in cumulative foreign currency translation (loss) gain (net of tax effect of $4.9, $2.1, and $2.1) | (75.8 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | (1.1 | ) |
| Total other comprehensive (loss) income | (52.7 | ) | | 5.1 |
| | (11.6 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 29.1 |
| | $ | 233.9 |
| | $ | 235.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (582.1 | ) | | $ | (330.5 | ) | | $ | 81.8 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of reclassifications: | | | | | |
| Net (loss) gain on derivative instruments (net of tax effect of ($1.1), $0.6, and ($0.7)) | (1.1 | ) | | (27.1 | ) | | 39.3 |
|
| Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (net of tax effect of ($0.5), $0.0, and ($0.2)) | 1.3 |
| | (1.4 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
| Change in defined benefit pension items (net of tax effect of ($0.9), $0.9, and $1.8) | (5.5 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | | (16.0 | ) |
| Net change in cumulative foreign currency translation loss (net of tax effect of $0.2, $0.5, and $4.9) | (52.1 | ) | | (34.7 | ) | | (75.8 | ) |
| Total other comprehensive loss | (57.4 | ) | | (67.8 | ) | | (52.7 | ) |
| Total comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (639.5 | ) | | $ | (398.3 | ) | | $ | 29.1 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AUTODESK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except per share data)
| | | | January 31,
2015 | | January 31,
2014 | January 31,
2017 | | January 31,
2016 |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| Current assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,410.6 |
| | $ | 1,853.0 |
| $ | 1,213.1 |
| | $ | 1,353.0 |
|
| Marketable securities | 615.8 |
| | 414.1 |
| 686.8 |
| | 897.9 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 458.9 |
| | 423.7 |
| 452.3 |
| | 653.6 |
|
| Deferred income taxes, net | 85.1 |
| | 56.8 |
| |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 100.9 |
| | 87.4 |
| 108.4 |
| | 88.6 |
|
| Total current assets | 2,671.3 |
| | 2,835.0 |
| 2,460.6 |
| | 2,993.1 |
|
| Marketable securities | 273.0 |
| | 277.3 |
| 306.2 |
| | 532.3 |
|
| Computer equipment, software, furniture, and leasehold improvements, net | 159.2 |
| | 130.3 |
| 158.6 |
| | 169.3 |
|
| Developed technologies, net | 86.5 |
| | 63.1 |
| 45.7 |
| | 70.8 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,456.2 |
| | 1,009.9 |
| 1,561.1 |
| | 1,535.0 |
|
| Deferred income taxes, net | 100.0 |
| | 131.1 |
| 63.9 |
| | 9.2 |
|
| Other assets | 167.6 |
| | 148.3 |
| 202.0 |
| | 205.6 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 4,913.8 |
| | $ | 4,595.0 |
| $ | 4,798.1 |
| | $ | 5,515.3 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 100.5 |
| | $ | 84.5 |
| $ | 93.5 |
| | $ | 119.9 |
|
| Accrued compensation | 253.3 |
| | 181.2 |
| 238.2 |
| | 243.3 |
|
| Accrued income taxes | 28.2 |
| | 24.3 |
| 50.0 |
| | 29.4 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 900.8 |
| | 696.2 |
| 1,270.1 |
| | 1,068.9 |
|
| Current portion of long-term notes payable, net | | 398.7 |
| | — |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 117.3 |
| | 85.3 |
| 134.9 |
| | 129.5 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 1,400.1 |
| | 1,071.5 |
| 2,185.4 |
| | 1,591.0 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 256.3 |
| | 204.4 |
| |
| Long term income taxes payable | 158.8 |
| | 211.8 |
| |
| Long term notes payable, net of discount | 747.2 |
| | 746.4 |
| |
| Other liabilities | 132.2 |
| | 99.4 |
| |
| Long-term deferred revenue | | 517.9 |
| | 450.3 |
|
| Long-term income taxes payable | | 39.3 |
| | 161.4 |
|
| Long-term deferred income taxes | | 91.5 |
| | 67.7 |
|
| Long-term notes payable, net | | 1,092.0 |
| | 1,487.7 |
|
| Long-term other liabilities | | 138.4 |
| | 137.6 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies |
| |
|
| |
|
| Stockholders’ equity: |
| |
|
| |
|
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; shares authorized 2.0; none issued or outstanding at January 31, 2015 and 2014 | — |
| | — |
| |
| Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value; shares authorized 750.0; 227.0 outstanding at January 31, 2015 and 226.7 outstanding at January 31, 2014 | 1,773.1 |
| | 1,637.3 |
| |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; shares authorized 2.0; none issued or outstanding at January 31, 2017 and 2016 | | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value; shares authorized 750.0; 220.3 outstanding at January 31, 2017 and 224.4 outstanding at January 31, 2016 | | 1,876.3 |
| | 1,821.5 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (53.3 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | (178.5 | ) | | (121.1 | ) |
| Retained earnings | 499.4 |
| | 624.8 |
| |
| Accumulated deficit | | (964.2 | ) | | (80.8 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 2,219.2 |
| | 2,261.5 |
| 733.6 |
| | 1,619.6 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 4,913.8 |
| | $ | 4,595.0 |
| $ | 4,798.1 |
| | $ | 5,515.3 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AUTODESK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
| | | | Fiscal year ended January 31, | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Operating Activities | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 81.8 |
| | $ | 228.8 |
| | $ | 247.4 |
| |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (582.1 | ) | | $ | (330.5 | ) | | $ | 81.8 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation, amortization, and accretion | 145.9 |
| | 128.9 |
| | 127.8 |
| 139.2 |
| | 145.8 |
| | 145.9 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 165.6 |
| | 132.2 |
| | 156.3 |
| 221.8 |
| | 197.2 |
| | 165.6 |
|
| Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | (0.5 | ) | | (9.1 | ) | | (12.9 | ) | |
| Restructuring charges, net | 3.1 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 43.9 |
| |
| Deferred income taxes | | (38.8 | ) | | 235.9 |
| | (18.8 | ) |
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | | 80.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.1 |
|
| Other operating activities | 16.2 |
| | (16.1 | ) | | 6.7 |
| (7.7 | ) | | (25.0 | ) | | 16.2 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business combinations: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (17.3 | ) | | 72.3 |
| | (98.1 | ) | 201.5 |
| | (195.5 | ) | | (17.3 | ) |
| Deferred income taxes | (18.8 | ) | | (49.4 | ) | | (28.3 | ) | |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 6.8 |
| | (20.3 | ) | | 0.1 |
| (13.5 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | | 6.8 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 130.8 |
| | (19.6 | ) | | (28.3 | ) | 2.7 |
| | 24.9 |
| | 130.8 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 245.2 |
| | 66.0 |
| | 113.3 |
| 267.0 |
| | 360.5 |
| | 245.2 |
|
| Accrued income taxes | (50.7 | ) | | 37.0 |
| | 31.2 |
| (100.9 | ) | | 3.5 |
| | (50.7 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 708.1 |
| | 563.5 |
| | 559.1 |
| |
| Net cash provided by operating activities (1) | | 169.7 |
| | 414.0 |
| | 708.6 |
|
| Investing Activities | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of marketable securities | (1,355.1 | ) | | (1,214.2 | ) | | (1,397.7 | ) | (1,867.9 | ) | | (2,250.1 | ) | | (1,355.1 | ) |
| Sales of marketable securities | 190.0 |
| | 537.0 |
| | 332.9 |
| 1,257.7 |
| | 329.4 |
| | 190.0 |
|
| Maturities of marketable securities | 969.0 |
| | 742.1 |
| | 764.8 |
| 1,057.2 |
| | 1,376.6 |
| | 969.0 |
|
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (630.0 | ) | | (176.1 | ) | | (263.7 | ) | (85.2 | ) | | (148.5 | ) | | (630.0 | ) |
| Capital expenditures | (75.5 | ) | | (64.2 | ) | | (56.4 | ) | (76.0 | ) | | (72.4 | ) | | (75.5 | ) |
| Other investing activities | (4.0 | ) | | (18.6 | ) | | (27.1 | ) | (13.8 | ) | | (44.5 | ) | | (4.0 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (905.6 | ) | | (194.0 | ) | | (647.2 | ) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | 272.0 |
| | (809.5 | ) | | (905.6 | ) |
| Financing Activities | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | 135.4 |
| | 288.2 |
| | 220.2 |
| |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | 119.6 |
| | 110.8 |
| | 175.4 |
|
| Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards | | (76.2 | ) | | (51.6 | ) | | (40.0 | ) |
| Repurchase and retirement of common shares | (372.4 | ) | | (423.8 | ) | | (431.2 | ) | (621.7 | ) | | (458.0 | ) | | (372.4 | ) |
| Draws on line of credit | — |
| | — |
| | 110.0 |
| |
| Proceeds from debt, net of discount | — |
| | — |
| | 745.6 |
| — |
| | 748.3 |
| | — |
|
| Repayments of line of credit | — |
| | — |
| | (110.0 | ) | |
| Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 0.5 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 12.9 |
| |
| Other financing activities | (3.4 | ) | | — |
| | (6.1 | ) | — |
| | (6.3 | ) | | (3.4 | ) |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (239.9 | ) | | (126.5 | ) | | 541.4 |
| |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (1) | | (578.3 | ) | | 343.2 |
| | (240.4 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (5.0 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | 2.0 |
| (3.3 | ) | | (5.3 | ) | | (5.0 | ) |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (442.4 | ) | | 240.8 |
| | 455.3 |
| |
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | (139.9 | ) | | (57.6 | ) | | (442.4 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year | 1,853.0 |
| | 1,612.2 |
| | 1,156.9 |
| 1,353.0 |
| | 1,410.6 |
| | 1,853.0 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of fiscal year | $ | 1,410.6 |
| | $ | 1,853.0 |
| | $ | 1,612.2 |
| $ | 1,213.1 |
| | $ | 1,353.0 |
| | $ | 1,410.6 |
|
| Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for interest | $ | 20.4 |
| | $ | 20.5 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | 34.7 |
| | $ | 20.4 |
|
| Net cash paid during the year for income taxes | $ | 63.4 |
| | $ | 75.7 |
| | $ | 59.7 |
| $ | 77.7 |
| | $ | 59.1 |
| | $ | 63.4 |
|
——————
| |
| (1) | During the three months ended July 31, 2016, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718)” (“ASU 2016-09”), which addresses among other items, updates to the presentation and treatment of excess tax benefits related to stock based compensation. The Company has adopted changes to the consolidated statements of cash flows on a retrospective basis. The impact for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 to net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities was $0.5 million. There was no impact to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AUTODESK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions)
| | | | Common stock and additional paid-in capital | | Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | Retained earnings | | Total stockholders' equity | Common stock and additional paid-in capital | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit) | | Total stockholders' equity |
| Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | |
| Balances, January 31, 2012 | 225.9 |
| | $ | 1,365.4 |
| | $ | 5.9 |
| | $ | 511.6 |
| | $ | 1,882.9 |
| |
| Common shares issued under stock plans | 10.2 |
| | 220.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 220.2 |
| |
| Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | 139.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 139.8 |
| |
| Tax benefits from employee stock plans | — |
| | (4.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4.3 | ) | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 247.4 |
| | 247.4 |
| |
| Other comprehensive (loss) | — |
| | — |
| | (11.6 | ) | | — |
| | (11.6 | ) | |
| Repurchase and retirement of common shares | (12.5 | ) | | (271.3 | ) | | — |
| | (159.9 | ) | | (431.2 | ) | |
| Balances, January 31, 2013 | 223.6 |
| | 1,449.8 |
| | (5.7 | ) | | 599.1 |
| | 2,043.2 |
| |
| Common shares issued under stock plans | 13.6 |
| | 288.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 288.2 |
| |
| Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | 132.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 132.2 |
| |
| Tax benefits from employee stock plans | — |
| | (12.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (12.2 | ) | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 228.8 |
| | 228.8 |
| |
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | 5.1 |
| |
|
| | 5.1 |
| |
| Repurchase and retirement of common shares | (10.5 | ) | | (220.7 | ) | | — |
| | (203.1 | ) | | (423.8 | ) | |
| Balances, January 31, 2014 | 226.7 |
| | 1,637.3 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | 624.8 |
| | 2,261.5 |
| 226.7 |
| | $ | 1,637.3 |
| | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | 624.8 |
| | $ | 2,261.5 |
|
| Common shares issued under stock plans | 7.2 |
| | 135.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 135.4 |
| 7.2 |
| | 135.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 135.4 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | 165.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 165.6 |
| — |
| | 165.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 165.6 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 81.8 |
| | 81.8 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 81.8 |
| | 81.8 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | (52.7 | ) | | — |
| | (52.7 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) | | — |
| | — |
| | (52.7 | ) | | — |
| | (52.7 | ) |
| Repurchase and retirement of common shares | (6.9 | ) | | (165.2 | ) | | — |
| | (207.2 | ) | | (372.4 | ) | (6.9 | ) | | (165.2 | ) | | — |
| | (207.2 | ) | | (372.4 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2015 | 227.0 |
| | $ | 1,773.1 |
| | $ | (53.3 | ) | | $ | 499.4 |
| | $ | 2,219.2 |
| 227.0 |
| | 1,773.1 |
| | (53.3 | ) | | 499.4 |
| | 2,219.2 |
|
| Common shares issued under stock plans | | 5.9 |
| | 59.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 59.2 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | | — |
| | 197.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 197.2 |
|
| Tax benefits from employee stock plans | | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Net loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (330.5 | ) | | (330.5 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) | | — |
| | — |
| | (67.8 | ) | | — |
| | (67.8 | ) |
| Repurchase and retirement of common shares | | (8.5 | ) | | (208.3 | ) | | — |
| | (249.7 | ) | | (458.0 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2016 | | 224.4 |
| | 1,821.5 |
| | (121.1 | ) | | (80.8 | ) | | 1,619.6 |
|
| Common shares issued under stock plans | | 5.6 |
| | 43.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 43.4 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | | — |
| | 221.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 221.8 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting changes | | — |
| | 6.9 |
| | — |
| | 113.0 |
| | 119.9 |
|
| Net loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (582.1 | ) | | (582.1 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) | | — |
| | — |
| | (57.4 | ) | | — |
| | (57.4 | ) |
| Repurchase and retirement of common shares | | (9.7 | ) | | (217.3 | ) | | — |
| | (414.3 | ) | | (631.6 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2017 | | 220.3 |
| | $ | 1,876.3 |
| | $ | (178.5 | ) | | $ | (964.2 | ) | | $ | 733.6 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AUTODESK, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 20152017
(Tables in millions of dollars, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk” or the “Company”) is a world leading design software and services company, offering customers productive business solutions through powerful technology products and services. The Company serves customers in the architecture, engineering, and construction; manufacturing; and digital media, consumer, and entertainment industries. The Company’s sophisticated software products enable its customers to experience their ideas before they are real by allowing them to imagine, design, and create their ideas and to visualize, simulate, and analyze real-world performance early in the design process by creating digital prototypes. These capabilities allow Autodesk’s customers to foster innovation, optimize and improve their designs, help save time and money, improve quality, and collaborate with others. Autodesk software products are sold globally, both directly to customers and through a network of resellers and distributors.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Autodesk and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
ReclassificationsSegments
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, Autodesk combined maintenance revenue and cloud services offering-related revenue into one category named “Subscription.” As a result, revenue and cost of revenue related to cloud service offerings previously reflected in “License and other revenue” and “Cost of license and other revenue” were reclassified to “Subscription revenue” and “Cost of subscription revenue.” These revenues and expenses have been reclassified in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal year 2013 to conform to the current period presentation as follows:
|
| | | | |
| | | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | | 2013 |
| Reclassifications within revenue: | | |
| Decrease to License and other revenue | | $ | (26.5 | ) |
| Increase to Subscription revenue | | 26.5 |
|
| Reclassifications within cost of revenue: | | |
| Decrease to Cost of license and other revenue | | $ | (32.1 | ) |
| Increase to Cost of subscription revenue | | 32.1 |
|
DuringThrough the second quarter of fiscal 2015,2017, Autodesk elected to present amortizationhad four operating and reportable segments: Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (“AEC”), Manufacturing (“MFG”), Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (“PSEB”), and Media and Entertainment (“M&E”).
During the third quarter of purchased customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user listsfiscal 2017, as a separate line itemresult of changes in our organizational structure from the business model transition and various other factors described further in Note 13, "Segments," management determined the Company operates as a single operating segment and single reporting unit. However, the Company will continue to provide disaggregation of revenue by product family and geographical information within operating expenses. As a result, amortization previously reflected in “General and Administrative” expense was reclassified to “Amortization of Purchased Intangibles" within Operating Expenses. These expenses have been reclassified in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 to conform to the current period presentation as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Reclassifications within operating expenses: | | | |
| (Decrease) to general and administrative | $ | (36.5 | ) | | $ | (42.1 | ) |
| Increase to amortization of purchased intangibles | 36.5 |
| | 42.1 |
|
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in Autodesk’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. On a regular basis, management evaluates these estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.
Examples of significant estimates and assumptions made by management involve the determination of the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, goodwill, financial instruments, long-lived assets and other intangible assets, the realizability of deferred tax assets, and the fair value of stock awards. The Company also makes assumptions, judgments, and estimates in determining the accruals for uncertain tax positions, variable compensation, partner incentive programs, product returns reserves, allowances for doubtful accounts, asset retirement obligations, and legal contingencies.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The assets and liabilities of Autodesk’s foreign subsidiaries are translated from their respective functional currencies into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenue and expense amounts are translated at exchange rates that approximate those rates in effect during the period in which the underlying transactions occur. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss). income.
Gains and losses realized from foreign currency transactions, those transactions denominated in currencies other than the foreign subsidiary’s functional currency, are included in interest and other income, net. Monetary assets and liabilities are
remeasured using foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the period, and non-monetary assets are remeasured based on historical exchange rates.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Under its risk management strategy, Autodesk uses derivative instruments to manage its short-term exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates which exist as part of ongoing business operations. Autodesk’s general practice is to hedge a majority of transaction exposures denominated in euros, Japanese yen, Swiss francs, British pounds, Canadian dollars, and Australian dollars. These instruments have maturities between one to 12 months in the future. Autodesk does not enter into any derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
The bank counterparties in all contracts expose Autodesk to credit-related losses in the event of their nonperformance. However, to mitigate that risk, Autodesk only contracts with counterparties who meet the Company’s minimum requirements under its counterparty risk assessment process. Autodesk monitors ratings, credit spreads, and potential downgrades on at least a quarterly basis. Based on Autodesk’s on-going assessment of counterparty risk, the Company will adjust its exposure to various counterparties. Autodesk generally enters into master netting arrangements, which reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty. However, Autodesk does not have any master netting arrangements in place with collateral features.
Autodesk accounts for its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and carries them at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value are accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are adjusted to fair value through earnings. See Note 2, "Financial Instruments" for information regarding Autodesk's hedging activities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Autodesk considers all highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Marketable Securities and Privately Held Company Investments
Marketable securities are stated at fair value. Marketable securities maturing within one year that are not restricted are classified as current assets. Substantially all marketable debt and equity investments held by Autodesk are classified as current based on the nature of the investments and their availability for use in current operations.
Autodesk determines the appropriate classification of its marketable securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. Autodesk carries all “available-for-sale securities” at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in stockholders’ equity until disposition or maturity. Autodesk carries all “trading securities” at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, recorded in “Interest and other income, net” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific-identification method.
Autodesk regularly invests in non-marketable debt and equity securities of privately held companies. The carrying values of such investments are included in other long-term assets. For the majority of our privately held company investments, we use the cost method of accounting.
All of Autodesk’s marketable securities and privately held company investments are subject to a periodic impairment review. The Company recognizes an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. Autodesk considers various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than Autodesk’s cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and Autodesk’s intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market value. Autodesk did not record any other-than temporary impairment charges during fiscal years ended January 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013. For additional information, see “Concentration of Credit Risk” within this Note 1 and Note 2, “Financial Instruments.”
Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable, net, consisted of the following as of January 31:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Trade accounts receivable | $ | 495.4 |
| | $ | 464.6 |
| $ | 477.5 |
| | $ | 700.1 |
|
| Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | (6.3 | ) | | (4.9 | ) | (1.5 | ) | | (7.6 | ) |
| Product returns reserve | (2.6 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | (0.2 | ) | | (1.6 | ) |
| Partner programs and other obligations | (27.6 | ) | | (32.0 | ) | (23.5 | ) | | (37.3 | ) |
| Accounts receivable, net | $ | 458.9 |
| | $ | 423.7 |
| $ | 452.3 |
| | $ | 653.6 |
|
Allowances for uncollectible trade receivables are based upon historical loss patterns, the number of days that billings are past due, and an evaluation of the potential risk of loss associated with problem accounts.
The product returns reserves are based on historical experience of actual product returns, estimated channel inventory levels, the timing of new product introductions, channel sell-in for applicable markets, and other factors.
As part of the indirect channel model, Autodesk has a partner incentive program that uses quarterly attainment of monetary rewards to motivate distributors and resellers to achieve mutually agreed upon business goals in a specified time period. A portion of these incentives reduce license and other revenue in the current period. The remainder, which relates to incentives on our Subscription Program, is recorded as a reduction to deferred revenue in the period the maintenancesubscription transaction is billed and subsequently recognized as a reduction to maintenancesubscription revenue over the contract period. These incentive balances do not require significant assumptions or judgments. TheDepending on how the payments are made, the reserves associated with the partner incentive program are treated on the consolidated balance sheet as either contra account receivable (when due to distributors and direct resellers) or accounts payable (when due to indirect resellers).payable.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Autodesk places its cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities in highly liquid instruments with, and in the custody of, multiple diversified financial institutions globally with high credit ratings and limits the amounts invested with any one institution, type of security, and issuer.
Geographical concentrations of consolidated cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities held by Autodesk as of January 31: | | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| United States | 19 | % | | 25 | % | 9 | % | | 26 | % |
| Other Americas | 1 | % | | 1 | % | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”) | 56 | % | | 57 | % | 80 | % | | 50 | % |
| Asia Pacific (“APAC”) | 24 | % | | 17 | % | 10 | % | | 23 | % |
Autodesk’s primary commercial banking relationship is with Citigroup Inc. and its global affiliates. Citibank, N.A., an affiliate of Citigroup, is one of the lead lenders and an agent in the syndicate of Autodesk’s $400.0 million line of credit facility. It is Autodesk’s policy to limit the amounts invested with any one institution by type of security and issuer.
Autodesk’s accounts receivable are derived from sales to a large number of resellers, distributors, and direct customers in the Americas; EMEA; and APAC geographies. Autodesk performs ongoing evaluations of these partners' financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary, but generally does not require collateral from such parties. Total sales to the Company's largest distributor Tech Data Corporation, and its global affiliates (“Tech Data”), accounted for 25%30%, 24%25%, and 23%25% of Autodesk's net revenue for fiscal years ended January 31, 2015,2017, 20142016, and 20132015, respectively. The majority of the net revenue from sales to Tech Data relates to Autodesk's Platform Solutions and Emerging Business ("PSEB") segment and is for sales made outside of the United States. In addition, Tech Data accounted for 22%20% and 24%22% of trade accounts receivable atas of January 31, 20152017 and 20142016, respectively.
Computer Equipment, Software, Furniture, and Leasehold Improvements, Net
Computer equipment, software, and furniture are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term. Depreciation expense was $73.1 million in fiscal 2017, $60.6 million in fiscal 2016, and $52.1 million in fiscal 2015, $47.2 million in fiscal 2014, and $45.6 million in fiscal 2013.
Computer equipment, software, furniture, leasehold improvements and the related accumulated depreciation at January 31 were as follows:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Computer hardware, at cost | $ | 194.0 |
| | $ | 163.0 |
| $ | 206.1 |
| | $ | 202.7 |
|
| Computer software, at cost | 84.9 |
| | 80.9 |
| 73.5 |
| | 85.6 |
|
| Leasehold improvements, land, and buildings, at cost | 176.3 |
| | 163.7 |
| |
| Leasehold improvements, land and buildings, at cost | | 206.3 |
| | 202.9 |
|
| Furniture and equipment, at cost | 53.0 |
| | 51.7 |
| 58.2 |
| | 59.0 |
|
| Computer software, hardware, leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment, at cost | 508.2 |
| | 459.3 |
| 544.1 |
| | 550.2 |
|
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | (349.0 | ) | | (329.0 | ) | (385.5 | ) | | (380.9 | ) |
| Computer software, hardware, leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment, net | $ | 159.2 |
| | $ | 130.3 |
| $ | 158.6 |
| | $ | 169.3 |
|
Costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized for application development activities, if material, and immediately expensed for preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities. These capitalized costs are amortized over the software’s expected useful life, which is generally three years. During fiscal 2015, Autodesk wrote-off $25.8 million of fully depreciated assets.
Software Development Costs
Software development costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are included in research and development expenses. Autodesk defines establishment of technological feasibility as the completion of a working model. Software development costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility through the period of general market availability of the products are capitalized and generally amortized over a three year period, if material. Autodesk had no material capitalized software development costs at January 31, 20152017 and January 31, 20142016.
Other Intangible Assets, Net
Other intangible assets include developed technologies, customer relationships, trade names, patents, user lists and the related accumulated amortization. These assets are shown as “Developed technologies, net” and as part of “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The majority of Autodesk’s other intangible assets are amortized to expense over the estimated economic life of the product, which ranges from one to ten years. Amortization expense for developed technologies, customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists was $72.2 million in fiscal 2017, $82.6 million in fiscal 2016 and $92.9 million in fiscal 2015, $80.7 million in fiscal 2014 and $82.0 million in fiscal 2013.
Other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization at January 31 were as follows:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Developed technologies, at cost | $ | 538.4 |
| | $ | 462.4 |
| $ | 583.6 |
| | $ | 571.4 |
|
| Customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists, at cost (1) | 348.9 |
| | 268.1 |
| 375.9 |
| | 371.6 |
|
| | 887.3 |
| | 730.5 |
| |
| Other intangible assets, at cost (2) | | 959.5 |
| | 943.0 |
|
| Less: Accumulated amortization | (715.4 | ) | | (626.2 | ) | (862.0 | ) | | (796.2 | ) |
| Other intangible assets, net | $ | 171.9 |
| | $ | 104.3 |
| $ | 97.5 |
| | $ | 146.8 |
|
_______________
| |
(1) | Included as a net balance in “Other assets” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Customer relationships and trade names includeSheets. |
| |
| (2) | Includes the effects of foreign currency translation. |
The weighted average amortization period for developed technologies, customer relationships, and trade names during fiscal 20152017 was 4.24.6 years. ExpectedExcluding in-process research and development, expected future amortization expense for developed technologies, customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists for each of the fiscal years ended thereafter is as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year ended January 31, | Fiscal Year ended January 31, |
| 2016 | $ | 73.2 |
| |
| 2017 | 49.7 |
| |
| 2018 | 24.0 |
| $ | 37.2 |
|
| 2019 | 15.5 |
| 28.9 |
|
| 2020 | 5.3 |
| 16.7 |
|
| 2021 | | 8.3 |
|
| 2022 | | 3.7 |
|
| Thereafter | 4.2 |
| 0.1 |
|
| Total | $ | 171.9 |
| $ | 94.9 |
|
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. Autodesk assigns goodwill to the reporting unit associated with each business combination, and tests goodwill for impairment annually in its fourth fiscal quarter or more often if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. For purposesimpairment may exist, or if events have affected the composition of the goodwill impairment test, a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below.units.
When goodwill is assessed for impairment, Autodesk has the option to perform an assessment of qualitative factors of impairment (“optional assessment”) prior to necessitating a two-step quantitative impairment test. Should the optional assessment be utilizedused for any given fiscal year, qualitative factors to consider include cost factors; financial performance; legal, regulatory, contractual, political, business, or other factors; entity specific factors; industry and market considerations, macroeconomic conditions, and other relevant events and factors affecting the reporting unit. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.
Therefore, the two-step quantitative impairment test is necessary when either Autodesk does not utilize the optional assessment or, as a result of the optional assessment, it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value. In performingThe first step of the two-stepgoodwill impairment test Autodesk uses discounted cash flow models which include assumptions regarding projected cash flows. Variances in these assumptions could haveidentifies if there is potential goodwill impairment. If step one indicates that an impairment may exist, a significant impact on Autodesk's conclusion assecond step is performed to whether goodwill is impaired, ormeasure the amount of anythe goodwill impairment, charge. Impairment charges, if any, result from instances whereany. Goodwill impairment exists when the estimated fair valuesvalue of net assets associated with goodwill areis less than theirits carrying values. As changesvalue. If impairment exists, the carrying value of the goodwill is reduced to fair value through an impairment charge recorded in business conditions and assumptions occur, Autodesk may be required to record impairment charges.our statements of operations. The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires significant judgment at many points during the analysis. The value of Autodesk’s goodwill could also be impacted by future adverse changes such as: (i) declines in Autodesk’s actual financial results, (ii) a sustained decline in Autodesk’s market capitalization, (iii) significant slowdown in the worldwide economy or the industries Autodesk serves, or (iv) changes in Autodesk’s business strategy or internal financial forecast results.strategy.
ForAs described in Note 13, "Segments" commencing in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 annual goodwill2017, Autodesk changed its segment reporting as it now operates as a single operating segment and single reporting unit. In situations in which an entity's reporting unit is publicly traded, the fair value for step one of the impairment testing, Autodesk had five reporting units: PSEB, Manufacturing ("MFG"), Architecture, Engineering, and Construction ("AEC"), Media and Entertainment ("M&E"), and Delcam.
test may be approximated by the entity's market capitalization. For the annual impairment assessment in fiscal 2015, Autodesk utilized the optional assessment for Delcam. Based on a review of the qualitative factors described above, we determined that for our Delcam reporting unit, it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. As a result, we concluded that performing the two-step impairment test, was not necessary for Delcam.
For each of the remaining four reporting units, Autodesk did not utilize the optional assessment but rather performed the quantitative two-step impairment test. In performing the quantitative two-step test, Autodesk used a discounted cash flow model which included assumptions regarding projected cash flows. Based on this testing, Autodesk determined that the fair valueAutodesk's market capitalization was substantially in excess of the carrying value for each of the four reporting units and therefore theCompany as of January 31, 2017. Accordingly, Autodesk has determined there was no goodwill of each reporting unit was not impairedimpairment during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.2017. In addition, Autodesk did not recognize any goodwill impairment losses in fiscal 20142016 or 2013.2015.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill during the fiscal yearyears ended January 31, 20152017 isand January 31, 2016 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Platform Solutions and Emerging Business | | Architecture, Engineering, and Construction | | Manufacturing | | Media and Entertainment | | Delcam | | Total |
| Balance as of January 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill | $ | 142.3 |
| | $ | 415.2 |
| | $ | 411.6 |
| | $ | 190.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,159.1 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (149.2 | ) | | — |
| | (149.2 | ) |
| | 142.3 |
| | 415.2 |
| | 411.6 |
| | 40.8 |
| | — |
| | 1,009.9 |
|
| Delcam plc | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 196.1 |
| | 196.1 |
|
| Within Technologies Limited | 80.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
|
| | 80.6 |
|
| Shotgun Software Inc. | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 43.2 |
| |
|
| | 43.2 |
|
| Goodwill acquired from other acquisitions | 117.8 |
| | 28.1 |
| | 20.1 |
| | 15.3 |
| |
|
| | 181.3 |
|
| Effect of foreign currency translation, purchase accounting adjustments, and other | (13.2 | ) | | (16.3 | ) | | (9.0 | ) | | (3.3 | ) | | (13.1 | ) | | (54.9 | ) |
| Balance as of January 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill | 327.5 |
| | 427.0 |
| | 422.7 |
| | 245.2 |
| | 183.0 |
| | 1,605.4 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (149.2 | ) | | — |
| | (149.2 | ) |
| | $ | 327.5 |
| | $ | 427.0 |
| | $ | 422.7 |
| | $ | 96.0 |
| | $ | 183.0 |
| | $ | 1,456.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Goodwill, beginning of the year | $ | 1,684.2 |
| | $ | 1,605.4 |
|
| Less: accumulated impairment losses, beginning of the year | (149.2 | ) | | (149.2 | ) |
| Additions arising from acquisitions during the year (1) | 62.8 |
| | 97.3 |
|
| Effect of foreign currency translation, measurement period adjustments, and other (2) | (36.7 | ) | | (18.5 | ) |
| Goodwill, end of the year | $ | 1,561.1 |
| | $ | 1,535.0 |
|
2015 Form 10-K 68_______________
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Platform Solutions and Emerging Business | | Architecture, Engineering, and Construction | | Manufacturing | | Media and Entertainment | | Total |
| Balance as of January 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill | $ | 129.5 |
| | $ | 310.3 |
| | $ | 389.9 |
| | $ | 191.0 |
| | $ | 1,020.7 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (149.2 | ) | | (149.2 | ) |
| | 129.5 |
| | 310.3 |
| | 389.9 |
| | 41.8 |
| | 871.5 |
|
| Graitec SA | — |
| | 73.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 73.4 |
|
| Goodwill acquired from other acquisitions | 12.8 |
| | 32.0 |
| | 22.2 |
| | — |
| | 67.0 |
|
| Effect of foreign currency translation, purchase accounting adjustments, and other | — |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
| Balance as of January 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill | 142.3 |
| | 415.2 |
| | 411.6 |
| | 190.0 |
| | 1,159.1 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (149.2 | ) | | (149.2 | ) |
| | $ | 142.3 |
| | $ | 415.2 |
| | $ | 411.6 |
| | $ | 40.8 |
| | $ | 1,009.9 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments reflect revisions made to the Company’s preliminary purchase price allocations during fiscal 2015 and 2014.
| |
| (1) | The fiscal 2016 balance has not been adjusted here for measurement period adjustments made in fiscal 2017. Refer to Note 5, "Acquisitions" for additional information on the amounts recorded in fiscal 2017 that relate to goodwill from fiscal 2016 acquisitions. |
| |
| (2) | Purchase accounting adjustments reflect revisions made to the Company’s preliminary purchase price allocations during fiscal 2017 and 2016. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
At least annually or more frequently as circumstances dictate, Autodesk reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever impairment indicators exist. Autodesk continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, Autodesk assesses recoverability of these assets. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the carrying amounts of the assets to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If the long-lived assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is equal to the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value. Autodesk did not recognize any impairmentmaterial impairments of long-lived assets during the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 2014,2016, and 2013,2015, respectively.
In addition to the recoverability assessments, Autodesk routinely reviews the remaining estimated useful lives of its long-lived assets. Any reduction in the useful life assumption will result in increased depreciation and amortization expense in the quarter when such determinations are made, as well as in subsequent quarters.
Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred tax assets arise primarily from tax credits, net operating losses, and timing differences for reserves, accrued liabilities, stock options, deferred revenue, purchased technologies, and capitalized intangibles, partially offset by the establishment of U.S. deferred tax liabilities on unremitted earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries, acquired intangibles, and valuation allowances against U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets. We performAutodesk performed a quarterly assessment of the recoverability of these net deferred tax assets and believe that we will generate sufficient future taxable income in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize the net deferred tax assets. They are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce gross deferred tax assets to the amount “morethat is "more likely than not” expectednot" to be realized.
Revenue Recognition
Autodesk recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable.
For multiple element arrangements containing only software and software-related elements, Autodesk allocates the sales price among each of the deliverables using the residual method, under which revenuea portion of the total arrangement consideration is allocated to undelivered elements based on their vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value.value and the remainder or residual of the total consideration is recognized as revenue for the delivered elements. VSOE is the price charged when an element is sold separately or a price set by management with the relevant authority. If Autodesk does not have VSOE of an undelivered element, revenue recognition is deferred on the entire sales arrangement until all elements for which Autodesk does not have VSOE are delivered. If Autodesk does not have VSOE for undelivered product subscriptions, maintenance or services, the revenuetotal consideration for the arrangement is recognized ratably over the longest contractual service period in the arrangement. Revenue recognition for significant lines of business is discussed further below.
For multiple element arrangements involving non-software elements, including cloud subscription services, our revenue recognition policy is based upon the accounting guidance contained in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. For these arrangements,
Autodesk first allocates the total arrangement consideration based on the relative selling prices of the software group of elements as a whole and the non-software elements. Autodesk then further allocates consideration within the software group to the respective elements within that group using the residual method as described above. Autodesk exercises judgment and uses estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in each accounting period.
Autodesk allocates the total arrangement consideration among the various elements based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its VSOE if available, third-party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available, or the best estimated selling price ("BESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. BESP represents the price at which Autodesk would transact for the deliverable if it were sold regularly on a standalone basis. To establish BESP for those elements for which neither VSOE nor TPE are available, Autodesk performs a quantitative analysis of pricing data points for historical standalone transactions involving such elements for a twelve-month period. As part of this analysis, Autodesk monitors and evaluates the BESP against actual pricing to ensure that it continues to represent a reasonable estimate of the standalone selling price, considering several other external and internal factors including, but not limited to, pricing and discounting practices, contractually stated prices, the geographies in which Autodesk offers products and services, and the type of customer (i.e. distributor, value-added reseller, and direct end user, among others). Autodesk analyzes BESP at least annually or on a more frequent basis if a significant change in our business necessitates a more timely analysis, or if significant selling price variances are experienced.
In situations when Autodesk has multiple contracts with a single counterparty, Autodesk uses the guidance in ASC 985-605 to evaluate both the form and the substance of the arrangements to determine if they should be combined and accounted for as one arrangement or as separate arrangements.
Autodesk’s assessment of likelihood of collection is also a critical element in determining the timing of revenue recognition. If collection is not probable, the revenue will be deferred until the earlier of when collectionpayment is deemed probable or cash is received.
License and other revenue are comprised of two components: (1) all forms of product license revenue and (2) other revenue.
(1) All Forms of Product License Revenue
Product license revenue includes: software license revenue from the sale of new seat licenses and upgrades and product revenue for Creative Finishing.
(2) Other Revenue
Other revenue includes revenue from consulting, training, Autodesk Developers Network, and Creative Finishing customer support, and is recognized over time, as the services are performed.
Autodesk's Subscription revenue consists of two components: maintenance revenue for our software products and revenue for our cloud service offerings, including Autodesk 360. Autodesk's maintenance program provides our commercial and educational customers of perpetual products with a cost effective and predictable budgetary option to obtain the productivity benefits of our new releases and enhancements when and if released during the term of their contracts. Under Autodesk's maintenance program, customers are eligible to receive unspecified upgrades when and if available, downloadable training courses, and online support. Autodesk recognizes maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement, which is generally between one and three years but can occasionally be as long as five years. Revenue for Autodesk's cloud service offerings is recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date Autodesk's service is made available to customers and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
2015 Form 10-K 70License and other revenue consists of two components: product license revenue and other revenue. Product license revenue includes software license revenue from the sale of perpetual licenses, term-based licenses from our desktop subscription and enterprise offerings, and product revenue for Creative Finishing. Other revenue includes revenue from consulting, training, Autodesk Developers Network and Creative Finishing customer support, and is recognized over time, as the services are performed.
Taxes Collected from Customers
Autodesk nets taxes collected from customers against those remitted to government authorities in the consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, taxes collected from customers are not reported as revenue.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenue for all periods presented.
Stock-based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, respectively, as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Cost of subscription | | $ | 7.0 |
| | $ | 5.7 |
| | $ | 4.3 |
|
| Cost of license and other revenue | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 3.7 |
| 7.1 |
| | 6.1 |
| | 4.6 |
|
| Cost of subscription | 4.3 |
| | 2.2 |
| | 1.5 |
| |
| Marketing and sales | 72.4 |
| | 58.6 |
| | 64.3 |
| 94.1 |
| | 85.2 |
| | 72.4 |
|
| Research and development | 56.0 |
| | 43.7 |
| | 61.8 |
| 81.3 |
| | 70.4 |
| | 56.0 |
|
| General and administrative | 28.3 |
| | 23.9 |
| | 25.0 |
| 32.3 |
| | 29.8 |
| | 28.3 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards and ESP Plan purchases | 165.6 |
| | 132.2 |
| | 156.3 |
| |
| Stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards and Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") purchases | | 221.8 |
| | 197.2 |
| | 165.6 |
|
| Tax benefit | (45.2 | ) | | (36.4 | ) | | (35.5 | ) | (2.6 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | (45.2 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards and ESP Plan purchases, net | $ | 120.4 |
| | $ | 95.8 |
| | $ | 120.8 |
| |
| Stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards and ESPP purchases, net | | $ | 219.2 |
| | $ | 195.6 |
| | $ | 120.4 |
|
Autodesk determines the grant-dategrant date fair value of its share-based payment awards using a Black-Scholes Merton Option ("BSM") option pricing model or the quoted stock price on the date of grant, unless the awards are subject to market conditions, in which case Autodesk uses a binomial-lattice model (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation model). The Monte Carlo simulation model utilizes multiple input variables to estimate the probability that market conditions will be achieved. Autodesk uses the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards:
| | | | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended |
| | | January 31, 2015 | | January 31, 2014 | | January 31, 2013 | | January 31, 2017 | | January 31, 2016 | | January 31, 2015 |
| | | Performance Stock Unit (1) | | ESP Plan | | Performance Stock Unit (1) | | ESP Plan | | Stock Option (2) | | ESP Plan | | Performance Stock Unit | | ESPP | | Performance Stock Unit | | ESPP | | Performance Stock Unit | | ESPP |
| Range of expected volatilities | | 30% | | 29 - 33% | | 34% | | 27 - 36% | | 41 - 45% | | 41 - 44% | | 38 - 39% | | 30 - 40% | | 27% | | 28 -29% | | 30% | | 29 - 33% |
| Range of expected lives (in years) | | N/A | | 0.5 - 2.0 | | N/A | | 0.5 - 2.0 | | 3.6 - 4.6 | | 0.5 - 2.0 | | N/A | | 0.5 - 2.0 | | N/A | | 0.5 - 2.0 | | N/A | | 0.5 - 2.0 |
| Expected dividends | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% | | —% |
| Range of risk-free interest rates | | 0.1% | | 0.0 - 0.6% | | 0.1% | | 0.1 - 0.4% | | 0.5 - 0.8% | | 0.1 - 0.3% | | 0.6 - 0.7% | | 0.5 - 0.9% | | 0.2% | | 0.1 - 0.7% | | 0.1% | | 0.0 - 0.6% |
_______________
| |
(1)
| Autodesk did not grant PSUs in fiscal 2013 that were subject to market conditions. |
| |
(2)
| Autodesk did not grant stock options in fiscal 2015 or 2014. |
Autodesk estimates expected volatility for stock-based awards based on the average of the following two measures. The first is a measure of historical volatility in the trading market for the Company’s common stock, and the second is the implied volatility of traded forward call options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The expected volatility for PSUsperformance stock units ("PSUs") subject to market conditions includes the expected volatility of Autodesk's peer companies within the S&P Computer Software Select Index.
Autodesk estimates the expected life of stock-based awards using both exercise behavior and post-vesting termination behavior as well as consideration of outstanding options.
Autodesk did not pay cash dividends in fiscal 20152017, 20142016, or 20132015 and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the Black-Scholes-MertonBSM option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulation model.
The risk-free interest rate used in the BSM option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulation model for stock-based awards is the historical yield on U.S. Treasury securities with equivalent remaining lives.
Autodesk recognizes expense only for the stock-based awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Therefore,As permitted by ASU 2016-09, Autodesk has developed an estimateelected to account for forfeitures of the number ofour stock-based awards expected to cancel prior to vesting (“forfeiture rate”). The forfeiture rate is estimated based on historical pre-vest cancellation experience and is applied to all stock-based awards. The Company estimatesas those forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.occur.
Advertising Expenses
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising expenses incurred were $33.6 million in fiscal 2017, $29.8 million in fiscal 2016, and $23.9 million in fiscal 2015, $15.6 million in fiscal 2014, and $15.6 million in fiscal 2013.
Net (Loss) Income Per Share
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, excluding stock options and restricted stock units.stock. Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed based upon the weighted average shares of common shares outstanding for the period and potentially dilutive common shares, including the effect of stock options and restricted stock units under the treasury stock method.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The funded status of Autodesk's defined benefit pension plans is recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation for the fiscal years presented. The projected benefit obligation represents the actuarial present value of benefits expected to be paid upon retirement based on employee services already rendered and estimated future compensation levels. The fair value of plan assets represents the current market value of Autodesk's cumulative company and participant contributions made to the various plans in effect.
Net periodic benefit cost is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and includes service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service costs, and gains or losses previously recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. Certain events, such as changes in the employee base, plan amendments, and changes in actuarial assumptions may result in a change in the defined benefit obligation and the corresponding change to other comprehensive income.
Gains and losses and prior service costs not recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as they arise are recognized as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income. Those gains and losses and prior service costs are subsequently amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the average remaining service lives of the plan participants using a corridor approach to determine the portion of gain or loss subject to amortization.
The measurement of projected benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost is based on estimates and assumptions that reflect the terms of the plans and use participant-specific information such as compensation, age and years of services, as well as certain assumptions, including estimates of discount rates, expected return of plan assets, rate of compensation increases, interest rates, and mortality rates.
Accounting Standards in Fiscal 20152017
With the exception of those discussed below, there have been no recent changes in accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB or adopted by the Company during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20152017, that are of significance, or potential significance, to the Company.
Accounting Standards Adopted
Effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, Autodesk adopted FASB's Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 ("ASU 2016-09") regarding ASC Topic 718, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” The new guidance requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. In addition, cash flows related to excess tax benefits will no longer be separately classified as a financing activity apart from other income tax cash flows. The standard also increases the amount of shares an employer can withhold for tax purposes without triggering liability accounting, clarifies that all cash payments made on an employee's behalf for withheld shares should be presented as a financing activity in the statements of cash flows, and provides an entity-wide accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur.
Upon adoption, under the modified retrospective transition method, the Company recognized the previously unrecognized excess tax benefits as increases in deferred tax assets for tax credit and tax loss carryovers, of which $116.5 million were available to offset liabilities for uncertain tax benefits. This reduction in liabilities for uncertain tax benefits resulted in a cumulative-effect increase of $116.5 million to the February 1, 2016, opening accumulated deficit balance. Tax attributes not available to offset uncertain tax benefits were fully offset by a valuation allowance.
Autodesk elected to account for forfeitures as they occur using a modified retrospective transition method, which resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment of $6.9 million to reduce the February 1, 2016 opening accumulated deficit balance.
Accounting Standards AdoptedAutodesk elected to apply the change in presentation of excess tax benefits in the statements of cash flows retrospectively to all periods presented and no longer classifies them as a reduction from operating cash flows. The adoption had a $0.5 million impact to net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2015. There adoption had no impact for fiscal 2016. The retrospective presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact to any prior period since such cash flows have historically been presented as a financing activity. Additional amendments to the accounting for minimum statutory withholding tax requirements had no impact to opening accumulated deficit as of February 1, 2016 as Autodesk does not withhold more than the minimum statutory requirements.
Effective February 1, 2014,in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, Autodesk adopted FABS's Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16 ("ASU 2015-05") regarding Subtopic 350-40, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software: Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The amendments for ASU-2015-05 were prospectively applied and did not have a material impact on Autodesk's consolidated financial statements.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, Autodesk adopted FASB's Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”No. 2015-07 ("ASU 2015-07") 2013-11 regarding ASC Topic 740 “Income Tax.” This820 "Fair Value Measurement: Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)." The amendments in ASU clarifies2015-07 remove the guidancerequirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amendments also limit certain disclosures to investments for which the entity has elected to measure at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amendments were applied retrospectively by removing from the fair value hierarchy any investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Adoption did not have a material impact on the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in theits consolidated financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The adoption of this ASU resulted in an $81.9M reduction of both our long term taxes payable and long-term deferred tax assets as of January 31, 2015.statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
On May 28, 2014,In February 2017, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-05 ("ASU 2017-05"), "Other Income– Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets." The ASU, among other things, clarifies the scope of the derecognition of nonfinancial assets, the definition of in substance financial assets, and impacts the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets by requiring full gain recognition upon the sale. The amendments are effective for Autodesk's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018. The guidance may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment at the date of adoption. Autodesk is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated statements of financial condition and results of operations.
In January 2017, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04 ("ASU 2017-04"), "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment" which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill to eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In addition, it eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if that fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. The amendments will be effective for Autodesk's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2020 unless Autodesk elects early adoption. The new guidance is required to be applied on a prospective basis. Autodesk does not believe ASU 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and plans to early adopt in fiscal 2018.
In January 2017, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01 ("ASU 2017-01"), "Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business" which provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. The amendments will be effective for Autodesk's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018 unless Autodesk elects early adoption, which Autodesk is still evaluating. The new guidance is required to be applied on a prospective basis. The effect of the implementation will depend upon the nature of the Company's future acquisitions, if any.
In October 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16 ("ASU 2016-16"), “Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory” which requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The amendments will be effective for Autodesk's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018 unless Autodesk elects early adoption. The new guidance is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of
adoption. Autodesk is currently evaluating the accounting, transition, and disclosure requirements of the standard and cannot currently estimate the financial statement impact and timing of adoption.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 ("ASU 2014-092016-13") regarding ASC Topic 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This326, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses," which modifies the measurement of expected credit losses of certain financial instruments. Autodesk plans to adopt ASU provides principles for recognizing revenue for2016-13 as of the transfer of promised goods or services to customers with the consideration toeffective date which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU will be effective forrepresents Autodesk’s fiscal year beginning February 1, 2017. Early adoption is2020 and does not permitted.believe the ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 ("ASU 2016-02") regarding ASC Topic 842, "Leases." The amendments in this ASU require balance sheet recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for leases classified as operating leases, with an optional policy election to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The amendments also require new disclosures, including qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. Autodesk plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 as of the effective date which represents Autodesk’s fiscal year beginning February 1, 2019. The amendments require a modified retrospective approach with optional practical expedients. Autodesk is currently evaluating the accounting, transition, and disclosure requirements of the standard and cannot currently estimate the financial statement impact of adoption.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01 ("ASU 2016-01") regarding ASC Topic 825-10, "Financial Instruments - Overall." The amendments address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments, and require equity securities to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through net income. The amendments also simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment for impairment quarterly at each reporting period. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 will be effective for Autodesk's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018. An entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with prospective adoption of the amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values existing as of the date of adoption. Autodesk does not believe ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 ("ASU 2014-09") regarding ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2014-09 provides principles for recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14 to defer the effective date by one year with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date. In addition, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-10, Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, and Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-20 in March 2016, April 2016, May 2016, and December 2016, respectively, to help provide interpretive clarifications on the new guidance in ASC Topic 606.
Autodesk currently plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 as of February 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method.
In terms of Autodesk's evaluation efforts, the Company has assigned internal resources in addition to the engagement of third party service providers to assist in the evaluation. The Company's preliminary assessment is that there should be no material change in the timing and amount of the recognition of revenue for the majority of the Company's product subscription offerings and enterprise arrangements. This preliminary assessment is based on the Company's analysis that the related software and cloud services in a majority of the product subscription and enterprise offerings are not distinct in the context of the contract as they are considered highly interrelated and represent a single combined performance obligation that should be recognized over time. Due to the complexity of certain of our contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the new standard for these arrangements may be dependent on contract-specific terms and vary in some instances.
A limited number of Autodesk's product subscriptions do not incorporate substantial cloud services, and under ASU 2014-09 will be recognized as distinct license and service performance obligations. Revenue allocated to the licenses in these offerings will be recognized at a point in time instead of over the contract term. Autodesk does not currently believe the impact of the change to timing of revenue recognition for these limited offerings will be material. The company is currently evaluating its other revenue streams, but does not believe ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact.
Furthermore, the Company has made and will continue to make investments in systems and processes to enable timely and accurate reporting under the new standard. The company currently expects that necessary operational changes will be implemented prior to the adoption date.
As part of our preliminary evaluation, Autodesk has also considered the impact of the guidance in ASC Topic 340-40, "Other Assets and Deferred Costs; Contracts with Customers," and the interpretations of the FASB Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition ("TRG") from their November 7, 2016 meeting with respect to capitalization and amortization of incremental costs of obtaining a contract. As a result of this new guidance, Autodesk preliminarily believes that the Company will capitalize additional costs of obtaining the contract, which primarily relates to sales commissions. The amortization period for the Company's deferred costs will be recognized over the period of benefit. Autodesk's current accounting policy is to expense such costs as incurred.
While Autodesk continues to assess the potential impacts of the new standard, including the areas described above, and disclosure requirements of the standard, Autodesk does not know or cannot reasonably estimate quantitative information related to the impact of the new standard on our financial statements except as specifically noted above.
2. Financial Instruments
The following tables summarize the Company's financial instruments' amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value by significant investment category as of January 31, 20152017 and 20142016.
| | | | | January 31, 2015 | | January 31, 2017 |
| | | Amortized Cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Amortized Cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Cash equivalents (1): | Cash equivalents (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash equivalents (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Agency bonds | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | Certificates of deposit | 63.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 63.1 |
| | 63.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Commercial paper | 207.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 207.4 |
| | — |
| | 207.4 |
| | — |
|
| | | Corporate debt securities | 40.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40.2 |
| | 40.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Corporate debt securities | $ | 258.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 258.6 |
| | $ | 258.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Custody cash deposit | 3.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.2 |
| | 3.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Custody cash deposit | 141.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 141.5 |
| | 141.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Money market funds | 256.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 256.5 |
| | — |
| | 256.5 |
| | — |
|
| | Commercial paper | 161.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 161.0 |
| | — |
| | 161.0 |
| | — |
| Municipal bonds | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Corporate bond | 11.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11.5 |
| | 11.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Sovereign debt | 15.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.0 |
| | — |
| | 15.0 |
| | — |
|
| | Money market funds | 127.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 127.3 |
| | — |
| | 127.3 |
| | — |
| U.S. government securities | 309.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 309.5 |
| | 309.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Marketable securities: | Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Short-term available for sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Short-term available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Agency bond | 37.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 37.9 |
| | 37.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Agency bonds | 13.2 |
| | — |
| |
| | 13.2 |
| | 13.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Corporate debt securities | 148.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 148.0 |
| | 148.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Asset backed securities | 19.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19.6 |
| | — |
| | 19.6 |
| | — |
|
| | | Municipal bond | 29.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 29.3 |
| | 29.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Certificates of deposit | 157.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 157.3 |
| | 157.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Certificate of deposit | 101.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 101.9 |
| | 101.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Commercial paper | 109.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 109.2 |
| | — |
| | 109.2 |
| | — |
|
| | | Commercial paper | 258.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 258.4 |
| | — |
| | 258.4 |
| | — |
| | Corporate bonds | 234.7 |
| | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 234.5 |
| | 234.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Short-term trading securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Municipal bonds | 43.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 43.4 |
| | 43.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Mutual funds | 36.9 |
| | 3.4 |
| | — |
| | 40.3 |
| | 40.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Sovereign debt | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | 30.0 |
| | — |
|
| | Long-term available for sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. government securities | 32.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32.3 |
| | 32.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Agency bond | 50.6 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 50.8 |
| | 50.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Short-term trading securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Corporate debt securities | 199.4 |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 199.8 |
| | 199.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Mutual funds | 44.8 |
| | 2.5 |
| | — |
| | 47.3 |
| | 47.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Municipal securities | 13.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 13.4 |
| | 13.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Long-term available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. government agency securities | 8.9 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 9.0 |
| | 9.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Agency bonds | 7.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7.1 |
| | 7.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | Asset backed securities | 65.8 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 65.9 |
| | — |
| | 65.9 |
| | — |
|
| | | | Corporate bonds | 172.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 172.1 |
| | 172.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | Municipal bonds | 10.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10.7 |
| | 10.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | Sovereign debt | 1.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.5 |
| | — |
| | 1.5 |
| | — |
|
| | | | U.S. government securities | 48.8 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 48.9 |
| | 48.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Convertible debt securities (2) | Convertible debt securities (2) | 4.7 |
| | 2.5 |
| | (2.1 | ) | | 5.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.1 |
| Convertible debt securities (2) | 4.9 |
| | 2.3 |
| | (1.6 | ) | | 5.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.6 |
|
| Derivative contracts (3) | Derivative contracts (3) | 3.5 |
| | 19.5 |
| | (7.0 | ) | | 16.0 |
| | — |
| | 15.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| Derivative contracts (3) | 2.2 |
| | 12.3 |
| | (11.7 | ) | | 2.8 |
| | — |
| | 1.5 |
| | 1.3 |
|
| | | Total | $ | 1,592.6 |
| | $ | 26.6 |
| | $ | (9.4 | ) | | $ | 1,609.8 |
| | $ | 1,042.0 |
| | $ | 561.8 |
| | $ | 6.0 |
| | Total | $ | 1,903.5 |
| | $ | 17.4 |
| | $ | (13.6 | ) | | $ | 1,907.3 |
| | $ | 1,193.8 |
| | $ | 706.6 |
| | $ | 6.9 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | Included in “Cash and cash equivalents” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| |
| (2) | Considered "available for sale" and included in "Other assets" in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| |
| (3) | Included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets,” "Other assets," or “Other accrued liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| | | | | January 31, 2014 | | January 31, 2016 |
| | | Amortized Cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Amortized Cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Cash equivalents (1): | Cash equivalents (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash equivalents (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Agency bonds | $ | 8.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8.5 |
| | $ | 8.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | Certificates of deposit | 267.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 267.6 |
| | 267.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Commercial paper | 106.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 106.6 |
| | — |
| | 106.6 |
| | — |
|
| | Certificates of deposit and time deposits | $ | 280.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 280.7 |
| | $ | 30.4 |
| | $ | 250.3 |
| | $ | — |
| Custody cash deposit | 2.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.1 |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Municipal securities | 2.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | 2.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Money market funds | 382.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 382.4 |
| | — |
| | 382.4 |
| | — |
|
| | Commercial paper | 280.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 280.5 |
| | — |
| | 280.5 |
| | — |
| Municipal bonds | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Money market funds | 262.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 262.8 |
| | — |
| | 262.8 |
| | — |
| U.S. government securities | 103.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 103.0 |
| | 103.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Marketable securities: | Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Short-term available for sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Short-term available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Commercial paper and corporate debt securities | 261.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 261.0 |
| | 95.4 |
| | 165.6 |
| | — |
| | Agency bonds | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 39.9 |
| | 39.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Time deposits | 37.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 37.1 |
| | — |
| | 37.1 |
| | — |
| | Asset backed securities | 7.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7.3 |
| | — |
| | 7.3 |
| | — |
|
| | | U.S. government agency securities | 11.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11.3 |
| | 11.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Certificates of deposit | 190.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 190.3 |
| | 190.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Agency bond | 42.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 42.7 |
| | 42.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Commercial paper | 141.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 141.1 |
| | — |
| | 141.1 |
| | — |
|
| | | Municipal securities | 11.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11.7 |
| | 11.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Corporate debt securities | 377.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 376.9 |
| | 376.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Other (2) | 11.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11.4 |
| | 11.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Municipal bonds | 9.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9.7 |
| | 9.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Short-term trading securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sovereign debt | 20.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20.1 |
| | — |
| | 20.1 |
| | — |
|
| | | Mutual funds | 35.6 |
| | 3.3 |
| | — |
| | 38.9 |
| | 38.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | U.S. government securities | 74.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 74.6 |
| | 74.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Long-term available for sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Short-term trading securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Corporate debt securities | 179.7 |
| | 0.7 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 180.3 |
| | 180.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Mutual funds | 38.8 |
| | 0.4 |
| | (1.2 | ) | | 38.0 |
| | 38.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Agency bond | 43.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 43.4 |
| | 43.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Long-term available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. government agency securities | 9.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9.8 |
| | 9.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Agency bonds | 56.8 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 56.9 |
| | 56.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Municipal securities | 43.5 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 43.8 |
| | 43.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Asset backed securities | 36.5 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 36.6 |
| | — |
| | 36.6 |
| | — |
|
| Convertible Debt Securities (3) | 21.4 |
| | 3.2 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | 20.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20.2 |
| |
| Derivative contracts (4) | 10.8 |
| | 14.8 |
| | (6.0 | ) | | 19.6 |
| | — |
| | 10.5 |
| | 9.1 |
| |
| | | Total | $ | 1,545.3 |
| | $ | 22.4 |
| | $ | (10.5 | ) | | $ | 1,557.2 |
| | $ | 521.1 |
| | $ | 1,006.8 |
| | $ | 29.3 |
| | Corporate debt securities | 320.9 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 320.4 |
| | 320.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | Municipal bonds | 2.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | Sovereign debt | 16.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16.9 |
| | — |
| | 16.9 |
| | — |
|
| | | | U.S. government securities | 98.4 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 98.6 |
| | 98.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Convertible debt securities (2) | | Convertible debt securities (2) | 2.5 |
| | 2.0 |
| | (1.1 | ) | | 3.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.4 |
|
| Derivative contracts (3) | | Derivative contracts (3) | 1.5 |
| | 7.8 |
| | (7.4 | ) | | 1.9 |
| | — |
| | 1.6 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| | | | Total | $ | 2,310.6 |
| | $ | 11.1 |
| | $ | (11.0 | ) | | $ | 2,310.7 |
| | $ | 1,594.4 |
| | $ | 712.6 |
| | $ | 3.7 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | Included in “Cash and cash equivalents” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| |
| (2) | Consists of agency discount notes, U.S. treasury bills, and other short-term securities. |
| |
(3) | Considered "available for sale" securities and included in "Other assets" in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
| |
(4)(3) | Included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets,” "Other assets," or “Other accrued liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Autodesk classifies its marketable securities as either short-term or long-term based on each instrument’s underlying contractual maturity date. MarketableGenerally marketable securities with remaining maturities of less than 12 months are classified as short-term and marketable securities with remaining maturities greater than 12 months are classified as long-term. Autodesk may sell certain of its marketable securities prior to their stated maturities for strategic purposes or in anticipation of credit deterioration.
Autodesk applies fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist of cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other financial instruments, on a recurring basis. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require Autodesk to develop its own assumptions. When determining fair value, Autodesk uses observable market data and relies on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available. There have been no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the year ended January 31, 20152017.
Autodesk's cash equivalents, marketable securities, and financial instruments are primarily classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Autodesk values it's available for sale securities on pricing from pricing vendors, who may use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly in determining fair value (Level 2). Autodesk's Level 2 securities are valued primarily using observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Autodesk's Level 3 securities consist of investments held in auction rate securities, convertible debt securities, and derivative contracts which are valued using probability weighted discounted cash flow models and some of the inputs to the models are unobservable in the market.
A reconciliation of the change in Autodesk’s Level 3 items for the fiscal yearsyear ended January 31, 2015 and 20142017 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | (Level 3) |
| | | Derivative Contracts | | Convertible Debt Securities | | Taxable Auction-Rate Securities | | Total |
| Balance at January 31, 2013 | | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 17.5 |
| | $ | 4.2 |
| | $ | 32.4 |
|
| Purchases | | 1.3 |
| | 3.1 |
| | — |
| | 4.4 |
|
| Settlements | | — |
| | — |
| | (4.0 | ) | | (4.0 | ) |
| Losses included in earnings (1) | | (2.9 | ) | | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (3.1 | ) |
| Losses included in OCI (1) | | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | | — |
| | (0.4 | ) |
| Balance at January 31, 2014 | | 9.1 |
| | 20.2 |
| | — |
| | 29.3 |
|
| Purchases | | 0.1 |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Settlements | | (0.8 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | | — |
| | (3.8 | ) |
| Losses included in earnings | | (7.5 | ) | | (13.3 | ) | | — |
| | (20.8 | ) |
| Gains included in OCI | | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Balance at January 31, 2015 | | $ | 0.9 |
| | $ | 5.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6.0 |
|
(1) For comparability, the presentation of prior period balances were adjusted to align with current year presentation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | (Level 3) |
| | | Derivative Contracts | | Convertible Debt Securities | | Total |
| Balances, January 31, 2016 | | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 3.7 |
|
| Purchases | | 1.1 |
| | 4.0 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| Settlements | | (0.7 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (2.4 | ) |
| Gains (losses) included in earnings | | 0.6 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Gains included in OCI | | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2017 | | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | 6.9 |
|
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of Autodesk's “available-for-sale securities” classified by the contractual maturity date of the security:
| | | | January 31, 2015 | January 31, 2017 |
| | Cost | | Fair Value | Cost | | Fair Value |
| Due in 1 year | $ | 575.4 |
| | $ | 575.5 |
| |
| Due within in 1 year | | $ | 635.6 |
| | $ | 635.9 |
|
| Due in 1 year through 5 years | 276.9 |
| | 278.1 |
| 305.4 |
| | 305.8 |
|
| Due in 5 years through 10 years | | 2.6 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| Due after 10 years | | 7.0 |
| | 7.0 |
|
| Total | $ | 852.3 |
| | $ | 853.6 |
| $ | 950.6 |
| | $ | 951.3 |
|
As of January 31, 20152017 and 20142016, Autodesk did not have anyhad no material securities, individually and in the aggregate, in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months.
As of January 31, 20152017 and 20142016 Autodesk had $52.6$117.2 million and $49.8$104.3 million, respectively, in direct investments ofin privately held companies accounted for under the cost method, whichmethod. The privately held investments are included in other long-term assets and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment. If Autodesk determines that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, Autodesk writes down the investment to its fair value. Other than the amounts disclosed in the following paragraph, Autodesk does not intend to sell these cost method investments and it is not more likely than not that Autodesk will be required to sell the investment before recovery of the amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. Therefore, Autodesk does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at January 31, 2017. Autodesk estimates fair value of its cost method investments considering available information such as pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance, and any other readily available market data.
During fiscal 20152017, and 2016, Autodesk recorded $19.2$1.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in other-than-temporary impairments on its privately held equity investments. During fiscal 2014, Autodesk recorded no other-than-temporary impairment on its privately held equity and debt investments. The impairment expense was recorded in “Interest“Interest and other (expense) income, net”expense, net” on the Company's Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.
The sales or settlement of “available-for-sale securities” in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 resulted in a gain of $0.7 million and a loss of $0.2 million, respectively. The sales or redemptions of “available-for-sale securities” in fiscal 20132017, 2016, and 2015 resulted in no gains or losses.of $1.5 million, $0.1 million, and $0.7 million, respectively. The losses and gains were recorded in "Interest"Interest and other (expense) income, net"expense, net" on the Company's Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of marketable securities for fiscal 20152017 and fiscal 20142016 were $1,159.0 million$2.3 billion and $1,279.1 million,$1.7 billion, respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Under its risk management strategy, Autodesk uses derivative instruments to manage its short-term exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates thatwhich exist as part of ongoing business operations. Autodesk's general practice is to hedge a portion of transaction exposures denominated in euros, Japanese yen, Swiss francs, British pounds, Canadian dollars and Australian dollars. These instruments have maturities between one toand twelve months in the future. Autodesk does not enter into derivative instrument transactions for trading or speculative purposes.
The bank counterparties to the derivative contracts potentially expose Autodesk to credit-related losses in the event of their nonperformance. However, to mitigate that risk, Autodesk only contracts with counterparties who meet the Company's minimum requirements under its counterparty risk assessment process. Autodesk monitors ratings, credit spreads, and potential downgrades on at least a quarterly basis. Based on Autodesk's on-goingongoing assessment of counterparty risk, the Company will adjust its exposure to various counterparties. Autodesk generally enters into master netting arrangements, which reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty. However, Autodesk does not have any master netting arrangements in place with collateral features.
Foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Autodesk uses foreign currency contracts to reduce the exchange rate impact on a portion of the net revenue or operating expense of certain anticipated transactions. These contracts are designated and documented as cash flow hedges. The effectiveness of the cash flow hedge contracts is assessed quarterly using regression analysis as well as other timing and probability criteria. To receive cash flow hedge accounting treatment, all hedging relationships are formally documented at the inception of the hedge and the hedges are expected to be highly effective in offsetting changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions. The gross gains and losses on these hedges are included in “Accumulated“Accumulated other comprehensive loss”loss” and are reclassified into earnings at the time the forecasted revenue or expense is recognized. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, Autodesk reclassifies the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from “Accumulated“Accumulated other comprehensive loss”loss” to “Interest“Interest and other (expense) income, net”expense, net” in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements at that time.
The net notional amount of these contracts are presented net settled and were $336.6$369.4 million at January 31, 20152017 and $351.7$142.4 million at January 31, 2014.2016. Outstanding contracts are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheetbalance sheet at fair value. The majority of the net gain of $42.8$14.6 million remaining in “Accumulated“Accumulated other comprehensive loss”loss” as of January 31, 20152017 is expected to be recognized into earnings within the next twelve months.
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Autodesk uses foreign currency contracts which are not designated as hedging instruments to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with foreign currency denominated receivables and payables. These forward contracts are marked-to-market at the end of each fiscal quarter with gains and losses recognized as “Interest“Interest and other (expense) income, net.expense, net.” These derivative instruments do not subject the Company to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these derivative instruments are intended to offset the gains or losses resulting from the settlement of the underlying foreign currency denominated receivables and payables. The net notional amounts of these foreign currency contracts are presented net settled and were $44.6$270.6 million at January 31, 20152017 and $205.5$231.6 million at January 31, 2014.2016.
From time to time and consistent with its risk management policy, Autodesk also uses derivative instruments to hedge its economic exposure related to committed, in-process acquisitions priced in foreign currency. Such derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and are marked-to-market through earnings, with any gain or loss reflected immediately in “Interest and other (expense) income, net,” in each period.
In addition to these foreign currency contracts, Autodesk holds derivative instruments issued by privately held companies, which are not designated as hedging instruments. These derivatives consist of certain conversion options on the convertible debt securities held by Autodesk and an option to acquire a privately held company. These derivatives are recorded at fair value as of
each balance sheet date and are recorded in “Other assets.” Changes in the fair values of these instruments are recognized in income as “Interest“Interest and other (expense) income, net.expense, net.”
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments:
The fair value of derivative instruments in Autodesk’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows as of January 31, 20152017 and January 31, 20142016:
| | | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value at | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value at |
| | January 31, 2015 | | January 31, 2014 | January 31, 2017 | | January 31, 2016 |
| Derivative Assets | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges | Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1) | | $ | 20.4 |
| | $ | 4.4 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 10.1 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets | | 0.9 |
| | 16.9 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets | | 3.2 |
| | 4.9 |
|
| Total derivative assets | | $ | 21.3 |
| | $ | 21.3 |
| | $ | 13.3 |
| | $ | 8.3 |
|
| Derivative Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges | Other accrued liabilities (2) | | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| Other accrued liabilities | | $ | 4.5 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instrument | | Other accrued liabilities | | 6.0 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| Total derivative liabilities | | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | 6.4 |
|
_______________
| |
(1)
| Considering Autodesk's master netting arrangements, these contracts are presented net settled. The gross balance is $23.8 million and $5.9 million at January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. |
| |
(2) | Considering Autodesk's master netting arrangements, these contracts are presented net settled. The gross balance is $8.7 million and $3.2 million at January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. |
The effects of derivatives designated as hedging instruments on Autodesk’s Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 2013,2015, respectively (amounts presented include any income tax effects):
| | | | Foreign Currency Contracts | Foreign Currency Contracts |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on derivatives (effective portion) | $ | 46.4 |
| | $ | 12.2 |
| | $ | 5.1 |
| $ | 6.3 |
| | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 46.4 |
|
| Amount and location of gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income (effective portion) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | 13.1 |
| | $ | 16.0 |
| $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 39.8 |
| | $ | 10.5 |
|
| Operating expenses | (3.5 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | (1.8 | ) | | (10.5 | ) | | (3.5 | ) |
| Total | $ | 7.0 |
| | $ | 11.5 |
| | $ | 11.4 |
| $ | 7.4 |
| | $ | 29.3 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
|
| Amount and location of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivatives (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) | | | | | | |
| Interest and other (expense) income, net | $ | 0.9 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | |
| Amount and location of (loss) gain recognized in income on derivatives (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) | | | | | | |
| Interest and other expense, net | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | (0.7 | ) | | $ | 0.9 |
|
The effects of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on Autodesk’s Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 2013,2015, respectively (amounts presented include any income tax effects):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Foreign Exchange Contracts |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Amount and location of (loss) gain recognized in income on derivative | | | | | |
| Interest and other (expense) income, net | $ | (25.5 | ) | | $ | 12.8 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Amount and location of (loss) gain recognized in income on derivatives | | | | | |
| Interest and other expense, net | $ | (11.1 | ) | | $ | (1.7 | ) | | $ | (25.5 | ) |
3. Employee and Director Stock Plans
Stock Plans
As of January 31, 20152017, Autodesk maintained two active stock plans for the purpose of granting equity awards to employees and to non-employee members of Autodesk’s Board of Directors: the 2012 Employee Stock Plan (as amended, the “2012 Employee Plan”), which is available only to employees, and the Autodesk 2012 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan (“2012 Directors' Plan”), which is available only to non-employee directors. Additionally, there are threetwo expired or terminated plans with options outstanding. The exercise price of all stock options granted under these plans was equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date.
The 2012 Employee Plan was approved by Autodesk's stockholders and became effective on January 6, 2012. On January 14, 2014,June 10, 2015, Autodesk's stockholders approved amendments to the 2012 Employee Plan, which increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan by 11.412.5 million shares and added additional performance goals to the plan.shares. The 2012 Employee Plan replaced the 2008 Employee Stock Plan, as amended ("2008 Plan"), and no further equity awards may be granted under the 2008 Plan. The 2012 Employee Plan reserves up to 32.645.1 million shares which includes 26.639.1 million shares reserved under the 2012 Employee Plan, as well as up to 6.0 million shares forfeited under certain prior employee stock plans during the life of the 2012 Employee Plan. The 2012 Employee Plan permits the grant of stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock awards. Each restricted stock unit or restricted stock award granted will be counted against the shares authorized for issuance under the 2012 Employee Plan as 1.79 shares. If a granted option, restricted stock unit, or restricted stock award expires or becomes unexercisable for any reason, the unpurchased or forfeited shares that were granted may be returned to the 2012 Employee Plan and may become available for future grant under the 2012 Employee Plan. As of January 31, 20152017, 22.136.7 million shares subject to options or restricted stock awards have been granted under the 2012 Employee Plan. Options and restricted stock that were granted under the 2012 plan vest over periods ranging from immediately upon grant to over a three year period and options expire 10 years from the date of grant. The 2012 Employee Plan will expire on June 30, 2022. At January 31, 20152017, 12.312.4 million shares were available for future issuance under the 2012 Employee Plan.
The 2012 Director's Plan was approved by Autodesk's stockholders and became effective on January 6, 2012. The 2012 Directors' Plan replaced the 2010 Outside Directors' Stock Plan, as amended ("2010 Plan"). The 2012 Directors' Plan permits the grant of stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock awards to non-employee members of Autodesk’s Board of Directors. Each restricted stock unit or restricted stock award granted will be counted against the shares authorized for issuance under the 2012 Directors' Plan as 2.11 shares. As of January 31, 20152017, 0.60.8 million shares subject to restricted stock unit awards have been granted under the 2012 Directors' Plan. Restricted stock units that were granted under the 2012 Outside Directors' Plan vest over one to three years from the date of grant. TheOn March 12, 2015, the Board reduced the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2012 Directors' Plan by 0.9 million shares, so that 1.7 million shares are now reserved 2.6 million shares of Autodesk common stock.for issuance under the 2012 Directors' Plan. The 2012 Directors' Plan will expire on June 30, 2022. At January 31, 20152017, 2.00.9 million shares were available for future issuance under the 2012 Director's Plan.
The following sections summarize activity under Autodesk’s stock plans.
Stock Options:
A summary of stock option activity for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20152017 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted average exercise price per share | | Weighted average remaining contractual term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (3) |
| | (in millions) | | | | (in years) | | (in millions) |
| Options outstanding at January 31, 2014 | 5.9 |
| | $ | 33.54 |
| | | | |
| Granted (1) | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (3.2 | ) | | 32.76 |
| | | | |
| Canceled/Forfeited | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Options outstanding at January 31, 2015 | 2.7 |
| | $ | 34.46 |
| | 4.2 | | $ | 53.1 |
|
| Options vested and exercisable at January 31, 2015 | 2.5 |
| | $ | 33.72 |
| | 3.9 | | $ | 49.9 |
|
| Options vested and exercisable as of January 31, 2015 and expected to vest thereafter (2) | 2.7 |
| | $ | 34.46 |
| | 4.2 | | $ | 53.1 |
|
| Options available for grant at January 31, 2015 | 14.3 |
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares (in millions) | | Weighted average exercise price per share | | Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) (in millions) |
| Options outstanding at January 31, 2016 | 1.6 |
| | $ | 37.06 |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (1.0 | ) | | 35.85 |
| | | | |
| Options vested, exercisable and outstanding at January 31, 2017 | 0.6 |
| | $ | 39.25 |
| | 3.1 | | $ | 25.8 |
|
| Options available for grant at January 31, 2017 | 13.3 |
| | | | | | |
_______________
| |
| (1) | Autodesk did not grant stock options in the twelve months ended January 31, 2015. |
| |
(2) | Options expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture rate. |
| |
(3) | Represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on Autodesk’s closing stock price of $54.01$81.34 per share as of January 31, 2015,2017, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. |
As of January 31, 20152017, compensation cost of $0.6 millionrelated to non-vestedstock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.2 years.has been fully recognized.
The following table summarizes information about the pre-tax intrinsic value of options exercised and the weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted during the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Intrinsic value of options exercised (1) | $ | 67.6 |
| | $ | 149.0 |
| | $ | 90.9 |
|
| Weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted (2) | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 13.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Pre-tax intrinsic value of options exercised (1) | $ | 32.0 |
| | $ | 32.6 |
| | $ | 67.6 |
|
——————
| |
| (1) | The intrinsic value of options exercised is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the option and the market value of the stock on the date of exercise. |
| |
(2) | The weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted is calculated, as of the stock option grant date, using the Black-Scholes Merton ("BSM") option pricing model. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2015 and 2014, Autodesk did not grant stock options. |
The following table summarizes information about options vested and exercisable, and outstanding at January 31, 20152017:
| | | | Options Vested and Exercisable | | Options Outstanding | | | | |
| | Number of Shares (in millions) | | Weighted average contractual life (in years) | | Weighted average exercise price per share | | Aggregate intrinsic value(1) (in millions) | | Number of Shares (in millions) | | Weighted average contractual life (in years) | | Weighted average exercise price per share | | Aggregate intrinsic value(1) (in millions) | Number of Shares (in millions) | | Weighted average exercise price per share |
| Range of per-share exercise prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $12.31 - $29.49 | 0.9 |
| | $ | 23.76 |
| | | | 0.9 |
| | $ | 23.83 |
| | | |
| $29.50 - $41.62 | 1.2 |
| | 38.73 |
| | | | 1.3 |
| | 38.85 |
| | | |
| $27.40 - $38.55 | | 0.2 |
| | $ | 33.00 |
|
| $38.56 - $42.38 | | 0.3 |
| | 41.62 |
|
| $42.39 - $43.81 | 0.4 |
| | 43.80 |
| | | | 0.5 |
| | 43.79 |
| | | 0.1 |
| | 43.81 |
|
| | 2.5 |
| | 3.9 | | $ | 33.72 |
| | $ | 49.9 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 4.2 | | $ | 34.46 |
| | $ | 53.1 |
| 0.6 |
| | $ | 39.25 |
|
____________________
| |
(1) | Represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on Autodesk’s closing stock price of $54.01 per share as of January 31, 2015, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.
|
These options will expire if not exercised at specific dates ranging through September 2022.
Restricted Stock:
A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20152017 is as follows:
| | | | Unreleased Restricted Stock Units | | Weighted average grant date fair value | Unreleased Restricted Stock Units (in thousands) | | Weighted average grant date fair value per share |
| | (in thousands) | | | |
| Unreleased restricted stock units at January 31, 2014 | 6,515.6 |
| | $ | 39.15 |
| |
| Unvested restricted stock at January 31, 2016 | | 7,739.6 |
| | $ | 51.80 |
|
| Granted | 4,481.8 |
| | 54.17 |
| 4,226.3 |
| | 65.95 |
|
| Vested | (2,675.6 | ) | | 37.36 |
| (3,585.0 | ) | | 52.12 |
|
| Canceled/Forfeited | (445.8 | ) | | 41.43 |
| (725.2 | ) | | 53.25 |
|
| Performance Adjustment (1) | (74.7 | ) | | 42.23 |
| (33.3 | ) | | 63.74 |
|
| Unreleased restricted stock units at January 31, 2015 | 7,801.3 |
| | $ | 48.46 |
| |
| Unvested restricted stock at January 31, 2017 | | 7,622.4 |
| | $ | 60.13 |
|
_______________
| |
(1) | Based on Autodesk's financial results and relative total stockholder return for the fiscal 2016 performance period, the fiscal 2014 and 2013period. The performance stock units were earnedattained at 65.8%rates ranging from 86.1% and 92.3%to 98.0% of the target award, respectively. The vesting of the performance stock units is subject to the holders satisfying the remaining service condition of the awards.award. |
For the restricted stock units granted during fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, the weighted average grant date fair value was $54.17, $42.37,$65.95, $52.53, and $33.32,$54.17, respectively. The grant date fair value of the shares vested during fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015 was $100.0$232.2 million, $73.8$193.3 million, and $33.6$147.8 million, respectively.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015,2017, Autodesk granted 4.03.8 million restricted stock units. The restrictedRestricted stock units vest over periods ranging from immediately upon grant to a pre-determined date that is typically within three years from the date of grant. Restricted stock units are not considered outstanding stock at the time of grant, as the holders of these units are not entitled to any of the rights of a stockholder, including voting rights. The fair value of the restricted stock units is expensed ratably over the vesting period. Autodesk recorded stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units of $118.9173.0 million, $74.9146.4 million, and $70.5118.9 million during fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, respectively. Included in the $70.5 million incurred in fiscal 2013, Autodesk incurred $16.6 million relating to the acceleration of vesting of equity awards held in Socialcam for Socialcam employees immediately prior to the acquisition. As of January 31, 20152017, total compensation cost not yet recognized of $245.0309.8 million related to non-vested awards, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years. At January 31, 20152017, the number of restricted stock units granted but unvested was 6.96.8 million.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 20152017, Autodesk granted 0.50.4 million performance stock units ("PSUs") for which the ultimate number of shares earned is determined based on the achievement of performance criteria at the end of the stated performance period.service. The performance criteria for these grants are based upon billingsnet new model subscription additions, new model Annualized Recurring Revenue ("ARR"), non-GAAP total spend, and subscriptionstotal subscription renewal rate goals ("FY17 performance criteria") adopted by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee, (the “Annual Financial Results”), as well as total stockholder return compared against companies in the S&P Computer Software Select Index (“Relative TSR”). Each PSUperformance stock unit covers a three year period:
Up to one third of the PSUperformance stock units may vest following year one, depending upon the achievement of Annual Financial Results for year onethe FY17 performance criteria as well as 1 year1-year Relative TSR (covering year one).
Up to one third of the PSUperformance stock units may vest following year two, depending upon the achievement of Annual Financial Resultsthe performance criteria for year two as well as 2 year2-year Relative TSR (covering years one and two).
Up to one third of the PSUPerformance stock units may vest following year three, depending upon the achievement of Annual Financial Resultsthe performance criteria for year three as well as 3 year3-year Relative TSR (covering years one, two and three).
PSUsPerformance stock units are not considered outstanding stock at the time of grant, as the holders of these units are not entitled to any of the rights of a stockholder, including voting rights. Autodesk has determined the grant-date fair value for these awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model since the awards are subject to a market condition. The fair value of the performance restricted stock units is expensed using the accelerated attribution method over the vesting period. Autodesk recorded stock-based compensation expense related to PSUsperformance stock units of $17.5$22.9 million,, $8.7 $23.2 million,, and $8.1$17.5 million during fiscal yearyears ended January 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015 respectively. As of January 31, 2015,2017, total compensation cost not yet recognized of $2.5$3.2 million related to non-vested PSUs,unvested performance stock units, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.8 years. At January 31, 2015,2017, the number of PSUsperformance stock units granted but unvested was 0.9 million.0.8 million.
1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan (“ESP Plan”ESPP”)
Under Autodesk’s ESP Plan,ESPP, which was approved by stockholders in 1998, eligible employees may purchase shares of Autodesk’s common stock at their discretion using up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to certain limitations, at not less than 85% of fairthe lower of Autodesk's closing price (fair market value as defined invalue) on the ESP Plan. offering date or the exercise date. The offering period for ESPP awards consists of four, six-month exercise periods within a 24-month offering period.
At January 31, 2015,2017, a total of 40.745.6 million shares were available for future issuance. This amount automatically increases on the first trading day of each fiscal year by an amount equal to the lesser of 10.05.0 million shares or 2% of the total of (1) outstanding shares plus (2) any shares repurchased by Autodesk during the prior fiscal year. Under the ESP Plan,ESPP, the Company issues shares on the first trading day following March 31 and September 30 of each fiscal year. The ESP PlanESPP expires during fiscal 2018.
Autodesk issued 2.12.3 million shares under the ESP PlanESPP at an average price of $36.99 per share in fiscal 2017, 2.1 million shares at an average price of $36.29 per share in fiscal 2016, and 2.1 million shares at an average price of $33.91 per share in fiscal 2015, 2.9 million shares at an average price of $22.61 per share in fiscal 2014, and 2.9 million shares at an average price of $21.79 per share in fiscal 2013. The weighted average grant date fair value of awards granted under the ESP PlanESPP during fiscal 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, calculated as of the award grant date using the BSM option pricing model, was $15.1419.20, $11.8011.85, and $12.2115.14 per share, respectively. Autodesk recorded $23.925.9 million, $22.927.1 million, and $34.023.9 million of compensation expense associated with the ESP PlanESPP in fiscal 20152017, 20142016, and 20132015, respectively.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes the number of outstanding options granted to employees and directors, as well as the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under these plans as of January 31, 20152017:
| | | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | |
| Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (in millions) | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (in millions) | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (in millions) | |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 10.5 |
| | $ | 34.46 |
| | 55.0 |
| (1) | 8.2 |
| | $ | 39.25 |
| | 58.9 |
| (1) |
| Total | 10.5 |
| | $ | 34.46 |
| | 55.0 |
| | 8.2 |
| | $ | 39.25 |
| | 58.9 |
| |
____________________
| |
| (1) | Included in this amount are 40.745.6 million securities available for future issuance under Autodesk’s ESP Plan.ESPP. |
4. 4. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
| | | | Fiscal year ended January 31, | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Federal: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | $ | (43.8 | ) | | $ | 29.1 |
| | $ | 30.9 |
| $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | (4.7 | ) | | $ | (43.8 | ) |
| Deferred | (11.9 | ) | | (41.4 | ) | | (13.3 | ) | 8.4 |
| | 220.9 |
| | (11.9 | ) |
| State: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | (13.2 | ) | | 0.6 |
| | 7.8 |
| (1.9 | ) | | 0.5 |
| | (13.2 | ) |
| Deferred | 9.0 |
| | — |
| | (18.6 | ) | 1.3 |
| | 20.9 |
| | 9.0 |
|
| Foreign: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | 69.5 |
| | 63.9 |
| | 54.3 |
| 93.9 |
| | 68.4 |
| | 69.5 |
|
| Deferred | (8.4 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | 1.5 |
| (45.0 | ) | | 4.2 |
| | (8.4 | ) |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 51.1 |
| | $ | 62.6 |
| $ | 58.3 |
| | $ | 310.2 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
|
During fiscal year 2015, the Company reduced its current federal and state taxes payable by $0.5 million related to excess tax benefits from non-qualified stock options, offsetting additional paid-in capital. Pursuant to accounting standards related to stock-based compensation, the Company has unrecorded excess stock option tax benefits of $217.9 million as of January 31, 2015. These amounts will be credited to additional paid-in-capital when such amounts reduce cash taxes payable. Foreign pretax income (loss) was $(27.6) million in fiscal 2017, $218.2 million in fiscal 2016, and $302.5 million in fiscal 2015, $380.5 million in fiscal 2014, and $383.3 million in fiscal 2013.2015.
The differences between the U.S. statutory rate and the aggregate income tax provision are as follows:
| | | | Fiscal year ended January 31, | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Income tax provision at U.S. Federal statutory rate | $ | 29.0 |
| | $ | 98.0 |
| | $ | 108.5 |
| |
| Income tax provision (benefit) at U.S. Federal statutory rate | | $ | (177.0 | ) | | $ | (7.1 | ) | | $ | 29.0 |
|
| State income tax benefit, net of the U.S. Federal benefit | (4.0 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | (17.3 | ) | | (7.6 | ) | | (4.0 | ) |
| Foreign income taxed at rates different from the U.S. statutory rate | (40.0 | ) | | (57.1 | ) | | (54.5 | ) | 22.3 |
| | (29.4 | ) | | (40.0 | ) |
| U.S. valuation allowance | 2.9 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 1.7 |
| 233.0 |
| | 345.0 |
| | 2.9 |
|
| Increase in attributes due to ASU 2016-9 adoption | | (119.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Change in valuation allowance from ASU 2016-9 adoption | | 119.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Tax effect of non-deductible stock-based compensation | 15.7 |
| | 10.8 |
| | 21.1 |
| 18.8 |
| | 19.3 |
| | 15.7 |
|
| Stock compensation windfall shortfall | | (23.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Research and development tax credit benefit | (7.2 | ) | | (8.8 | ) | | (7.0 | ) | (10.3 | ) | | (9.4 | ) | | (7.2 | ) |
| Tax (benefit) expense from closure of income tax audits and changes in uncertain tax positions | (0.7 | ) | | 3.6 |
| | (2.8 | ) | |
| Closure of income tax audits and changes in uncertain tax positions | | 8.2 |
| | (4.7 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
| Tax effect of officer compensation in excess of $1.0 million | 2.4 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 1.8 |
| 2.2 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 2.4 |
|
| U.S. Manufacturer's deduction | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (4.9 | ) | |
| Non-deductible expenses | | 2.0 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| Other | 3.1 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 0.4 |
| (0.6 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 0.9 |
|
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 51.1 |
| | $ | 62.6 |
| $ | 58.3 |
| | $ | 310.2 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
|
Significant components of Autodesk’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
| | | | January 31, | January 31, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Stock-based compensation | $ | 39.9 |
| | $ | 37.4 |
| $ | 37.6 |
| | $ | 37.5 |
|
| Research and development tax credit carryforwards | 62.6 |
| | 78.4 |
| 136.7 |
| | 91.3 |
|
| Foreign tax credit carryforwards | — |
| | 16.3 |
| 127.3 |
| | 51.1 |
|
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 43.6 |
| | 38.6 |
| 39.5 |
| | 41.5 |
|
| Other accruals not currently deductible for tax | 18.4 |
| | 14.5 |
| 18.7 |
| | 23.6 |
|
| Purchased technology and capitalized software | 13.2 |
| | 23.4 |
| 76.9 |
| | 64.3 |
|
| Fixed assets | 16.2 |
| | 17.5 |
| 24.3 |
| | 18.6 |
|
| Tax loss carryforwards | 16.0 |
| | 12.6 |
| 173.6 |
| | 17.6 |
|
| Deferred Revenue | 48.0 |
| | 33.1 |
| 128.3 |
| | 56.7 |
|
| Other | 7.4 |
| | 5.1 |
| 27.6 |
| | 13.9 |
|
| Total deferred tax assets | 265.3 |
| | 276.9 |
| 790.5 |
| | 416.1 |
|
| Less: valuation allowance | (70.8 | ) | | (67.2 | ) | (748.0 | ) | | (398.0 | ) |
| Net deferred tax assets | 194.5 |
| | 209.7 |
| 42.5 |
| | 18.1 |
|
| Indefinite lived intangibles | | (70.1 | ) | | (54.1 | ) |
| Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries | (9.4 | ) | | (21.8 | ) | — |
| | (22.4 | ) |
| Total deferred tax liability | (9.4 | ) | | (21.8 | ) | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | | (70.1 | ) | | (76.5 | ) |
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | 185.1 |
| | $ | 187.9 |
| $ | (27.6 | ) | | $ | (58.4 | ) |
Effective February 1, 2014, Autodesk’s tax expense is primarily driven by tax expense in foreign locations, withholding taxes paid on payments made to the U.S. from foreign sources, and tax amortization on indefinite-lived intangibles.
Autodesk prospectively adopted FASB's Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. In making that assessment, Autodesk considers both positive and negative evidence, whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance in the U.S., Autodesk considered cumulative losses in the U.S. arising from the Company's business model transition as a significant piece of negative evidence. Consequently, in our fiscal year 2016, Autodesk determined that a valuation allowance was required on our accumulated domestic tax attributes. In the current year, losses generated in the U.S. created incremental deferred tax assets, primarily net operating losses and R&D
regarding ASC Topic 740 “Income Tax.” This ASU clarifies the guidance on the presentation
credits, and those deferred tax benefit,attributes have also been offset by a full valuation allowance. As a result, Autodesk has no material federal income tax expense or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit in the consolidated financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. Research and development tax credit carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards as of January 31, 2015 have been reduced by unrecognized tax benefits to the extent the tax credit carryforwards would be expected to offset tax liabilities in the event the uncertain tax positions are disallowed.
current fiscal year. The valuation allowance increased by $3.6$352.4 million, $15.9$327.2 million, and $3.8$3.6 million in fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013 changes in valuation allowance wererespectively, primarily related to U.S. and Canadian deferred taxes.tax attribute. As Autodesk continually strives to optimize our overall business model, tax planning strategies may become feasible and prudent allowing us to realize many of the deferred tax assets that are offset by a valuation allowance; therefore, Autodesk will continue to evaluate our ability to utilize our net deferred tax assets each quarter, both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions, based on all available evidence, both positive and negative.
In the second quarter of this fiscal 2017, Autodesk providesadopted ASU 2016-9 and recorded on our balance sheet U.S. income taxesdeferred tax assets related to stock-based compensation that were not recorded on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries, except to the extent subsidiaries' earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the U.S. As of January 31, 2015, the cumulative amount of earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided was $1,809.4 million. The unrecognizedbalance sheet until they reduced Autodesk’s current tax expense. Under ASU 2016-9, those federal and state deferred tax liabilityassets were recorded on Autodesk’s balance sheet in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and consequently increased our valuation allowance by an equivalent amount. See Part II, Item 8, Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for these earnings was approximately $514.4 million.the impact on the valuation allowance as a result of the adoption in the rate reconciliation above.
Realization of theforeign non-current net deferred tax assets of $185.1$49.7 million is dependent upon the company'sCompany's ability to generate future taxable income in appropriate tax jurisdictions to obtain benefit from the reversal of temporary differences, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income are reduced and Autodesk then determines that it is not more likely than not to realize such deferred tax assets.
As of January 31, 2015,2017, Autodesk had $21.7$575.0 million of cumulative federal tax loss carryforwards and $354.3$526.8 million of cumulative state tax loss carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future income tax liabilities in certainfederal and state jurisdictions. As discussed above, these cumulative assets have full valuation allowance against them on our balance sheet as the Company has determined it is more likely that not that these losses will not be utilized. These federal and state tax loss carryforwards will expire beginning fiscal 20152019 through fiscal 20342038 and fiscal 20152019 through fiscal 2034,2038, respectively. Autodesk also had $7.4 million of cumulative UK tax loss carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future income tax liabilities indefinitely. Autodesk had $9.2 million of cumulative federal and state capital loss carryforwards as of January 31, 2015 which are available to offset future capital gains through fiscal 2018.
As of January 31, 2015,2017, Autodesk had $104.7$127.1 million of cumulative federal research tax credit carryforwards, $54.8$66.8 million of cumulative California state research tax credit carryforwards, and $59.8$54.6 million of cumulative Canadian federal tax credit carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future income tax liabilities in the respective jurisdictions. The federal tax credit carryforwards will expire beginning fiscal 20202021 through fiscal 2035,2038, the state credit carryforwards may reduce future
California income tax liabilities indefinitely, and the Canadian tax credit carryforwards will expire beginning fiscal 20242027 through fiscal 2034.2038. Autodesk also has $163.6$211.5 million of cumulative foreign tax credit carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future U. S. tax liabilities. The foreign tax credit will expire beginning fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2026.2028. As discussed above, these cumulative assets have full valuation allowance against them on our balance sheet as the Company has determined it is more likely that not that these losses will not be utilized.
Utilization of net operating losses and tax credits may be subject to an annual limitation due to ownership change limitations provided in the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. This annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits before utilization.
As No ownership change has occurred through the balance sheet date that would limit a result of certain business and employment actions and capital investments undertaken by Autodesk, income earned in certain Europe and Asia Pacific countries is subject to reduced tax rates through fiscal 2016 and 2020, respectively with extensions available with incremental business and employment actions. The net income tax benefits attributable to the tax status of these business arrangements are estimated to be $1.2 million ($0.01 basic net income per share) in fiscal 2015, $9.7 million ($0.04 basic net income per share) in fiscal 2014, and $6.6 million ($0.03 basic net income per share) in fiscal 2013. The income tax benefits were offset partially by accrualsmaterial amount of U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings, among other factors.federal and state tax attributes.
As of January 31, 2015,2017, the companyCompany had $245.8$261.4 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $227.3$247.3 million would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. However, this rate impact would be offset to the extent that recognition of unrecognized tax benefits currently presented as a reduction of deferred tax assets would increase the valuation allowance.
It is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months; however an estimate of the range of the possible change cannot be made at this time.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Gross unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the fiscal year | $ | 222.1 |
| | $ | 212.7 |
| | $ | 201.1 |
| $ | 254.3 |
| | $ | 245.8 |
| | $ | 222.1 |
|
| Increases for tax positions of prior years | 3.2 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 0.4 |
| 11.9 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| Decreases for tax positions of prior years | (2.5 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | (4.1 | ) | | (7.0 | ) | | (2.5 | ) |
| Increases for tax positions related to the current year | 33.2 |
| | 15.3 |
| | 17.8 |
| 11.1 |
| | 15.8 |
| | 33.2 |
|
| Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities | (5.4 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | (10.8 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (5.4 | ) |
Reductions as a result of lapse of the statute of limitations
| (4.8 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | | (3.2 | ) | (1.0 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | (4.8 | ) |
| Gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the fiscal year | $ | 245.8 |
| | $ | 222.1 |
| | $ | 212.7 |
| $ | 261.4 |
| | $ | 254.3 |
| | $ | 245.8 |
|
It is the company'sCompany's continuing practice to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. Autodesk had $2.0$2.5 million, $2.8$3.3 million, and $1.9$2.0 million, net of tax benefit, accrued for interest and an immaterial amount accrued for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of January 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014,respectively. There was $1.5 million and, 2013,$1.3 million of net expense and, $(0.8) million of net benefit for interest and penalties related to tax matters recorded through the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 respectively.
Autodesk and its subsidiaries are subject to income tax in the United States as well as numerous state and foreign jurisdictions. Autodesk's U.S. and state income tax returns for fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 20152017 remain open to examination. In addition, The Internal Revenue Service has started an examination of the Company's U.S. consolidated federal income tax returns and employment tax for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. While it is possible that the Company's tax positions may be challenged, the Company believes its positions are consistent with the tax law, and the balance sheet reflects appropriate liabilities for uncertain federal tax positions for the years being examined.
Autodesk files tax returns in multiple foreign taxing jurisdictions with open tax years ranging from fiscal year 20032005 to 2017.
Autodesk provides U.S. income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries, except to the extent subsidiaries' earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the United States. As of January 31, 2017, the cumulative amount of earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided was $1,738.9 million. The unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings was approximately $435.1 million.
As a result of certain business and employment actions and capital investments undertaken by Autodesk, income earned in certain Europe and Asia Pacific countries is subject to reduced tax rates through fiscal 2019. We have $27.1 million benefit ($0.12 basic net income per share) attributable to the tax status of these business arrangements in fiscal 2017, compared to none in fiscal 2016, and $1.2 million ($0.01 basic net income per share) in fiscal 2015.
5. Acquisitions
During the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017 and January 31, 20142016, Autodesk completed the business combinations and technology purchases described below. The results of operations for the following acquisitions are included in the accompanying Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations since their respective acquisition dates. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of the following acquisitions, individually and in the aggregate, were not material to Autodesk's Consolidated Financial Statements.
For acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, Autodesk recorded the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned to the identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. Autodesk recorded the excess of consideration transferred over the aggregate fair values as goodwill.
Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions The goodwill recorded is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise after the acquisitions.
On June 27, 2014, Autodesk acquired Shotgun Software, Inc. (“Shotgun”) for total consideration of $54.5 million, of which $51.2 million was cash consideration. Prior to acquiring Shotgun, Autodesk had a convertible debt investment in the company with an acquisition-date fair value of $3.3 million using a market approach to value the investment. Shotgun was a privately-owned company that provided a cloud-based production management solution that enabled digital studios to track, schedule, review, and collaborate on projects and images. Shotgun has been integrated into, and the related goodwill was assigned to, Autodesk's M&E segment. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
On May 29, 2014, Autodesk acquired all the outstanding shares of Within Technologies Limited ("Within Technologies”) for total cash consideration of $88.0 million. Autodesk used its non-U.S.-based cash for the transaction. Within Technologies is a United Kingdom based developer of design and simulation software for next generation manufacturing processes. The Within Technologies acquisition is expected to accelerate Autodesk’s development of tools and technologies for advanced manufacturing. Within Technologies has been integrated into Autodesk’s PSEB reportable segment. The amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes is $78.9 million.
On February 6, 2014, Autodesk acquired the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Delcam plc (“Delcam”), for $284.6 million. Delcam was previously listed as a public company (LON: DLC) and is a leading supplier of advanced CADCAM and industrial measurement solutions for the manufacturing industry. With this transaction Autodesk gains Delcam’s range of design, manufacturing, and inspection software that provide automated CADCAM solutions for a variety of industries, ranging from aerospace to toys and sports equipment. The transaction was structured as a cash offer for all the outstanding shares of Delcam, and Delcam has been integrated into Autodesk's MFG reportable segment. The amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes is $166.0 million.Fiscal 2017 Acquisitions
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015,2017, Autodesk also completed 21 otherseveral business combinationcombinations and technology acquisitions for total cash consideration of $234.5$87.0 million. These business combinations and technology acquisitions were not material individually or in aggregate to Autodesk's Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class for each of the business combinations and technology acquisitions completed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017:
|
| | | | |
| Developed technologies | | $ | 18.8 |
|
| Customer relationships and other non-current intangible assets | | 10.2 |
|
| Trade name | | 3.8 |
|
| Goodwill | | 62.8 |
|
| Deferred Revenue (current and non-current) | | (2.1 | ) |
| Deferred tax liability | | (7.1 | ) |
| Net tangible assets | | 0.6 |
|
| | | $ | 87.0 |
|
For certain business combinations included in the table above, the allocation of purchase price consideration to certain assets and liabilities is not yet finalized. Autodesk's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). For certain business combinations, the primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized are amounts for tax assets and liabilities, pending finalization of estimates and assumptions in respect of certain tax aspects of the transaction and residual goodwill, and the valuation of certain intangible assets.
Fiscal 2016 Acquisitions
On November 12, 2015, Autodesk closed a share purchase agreement with FIT AG (“FIT”) to acquire all of the outstanding shares of netfabb GmbH ("netfabb") for approximately $42.5 million cash consideration. Autodesk simultaneously entered into an investment agreement with FIT to invest approximately $27.4 million cash to acquire an equity interest in FIT. netfabb is a German-based provider of industrial grade additive manufacturing software solutions supporting most major 3D printers. FIT is a German-based provider of rapid prototyping and additive design and manufacturing services. The acquisition of netfabb provides Autodesk with software solutions that will reduce production costs and increase efficiency in 3D printing and additive manufacturing. The amount of goodwill that is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes is $29.8 million.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, Autodesk also completed several other business combination and technology acquisitions for total cash consideration of $106.8 million. These business combinations and technology acquisitions were not material individually or in aggregate to Autodesk's Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class for each of the business combinations and technology acquisitions completed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20152016:
| | | | Shotgun | | Within | | Delcam | | Other | netfabb (1) | | Other (2) |
| Developed technologies | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 28.9 |
| | $ | 39.0 |
| $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 27.3 |
|
| Customer relationships and other non-current intangible assets | 7.5 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 39.7 |
| | 9.8 |
| |
| Customer relationships | | 6.2 |
| | 12.9 |
|
| Trade name | 1.6 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 6.3 |
| 1.4 |
| | 4.7 |
|
| Goodwill | 43.2 |
| | 80.6 |
| | 190.4 |
| | 180.6 |
| 36.1 |
| | 63.7 |
|
| Deferred Revenue (current and non-current) | (0.7 | ) | | — |
| | (10.4 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | |
| Deferred revenue (current and non-current) | | (1.0 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
| Deferred tax liability | (2.6 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (13.2 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | (3.9 | ) | | (1.6 | ) |
| Net tangible assets (liabilities) | 0.1 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 32.7 |
| | 1.3 |
| |
| | $ | 54.5 |
| | $ | 88.0 |
| | $ | 284.6 |
| | $ | 234.5 |
| |
| Net tangible (liabilities) assets | | (2.9 | ) | | 0.5 |
|
| Total | | $ | 42.5 |
| | $ | 106.8 |
|
_______________
| |
| (1) | During fiscal 2017, Autodesk recorded measurement period adjustments in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The measurement period adjustments were recorded as a $3.3 million increase to goodwill, with an offsetting $3.3 million increase to net tangible liabilities. |
| |
| (2) | During fiscal 2017, Autodesk recorded a measurement period adjustment in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The measurement period adjustment was recorded as an $0.8 million decrease to goodwill, with an offsetting $0.8 million decrease to deferred tax liability. |
For Shotgun and certain other business combinations, the allocation of purchase price consideration to certain assets and liabilities is not yet finalized. Autodesk's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized are amounts for tax assets and liabilities, pending finalization of estimates and assumptions in respect of certain tax aspects of the transaction and residual goodwill.
Fiscal 2014 Acquisitions
On November 21, 2013, Autodesk acquired all of the outstanding shares of Graitec SA (“Graitec”) for total cash consideration of $87.0 million. The acquisition enhances Autodesk’s current offerings for structural engineering and expands our portfolio of technology for Building Information Modeling ("BIM") for structural fabrication and detailing. Graitec has been integrated into Autodesk’s AEC segment. The amount of goodwill that is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes is $64.1 million.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014, Autodesk also completed 14 other business combination and technology acquisitions for total cash consideration of approximately $89.7 million. These business combinations and technology acquisitions were not material individually or in aggregate to Autodesk's Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class for each of the business combinations and technology acquisitions completed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Graitec | | Other |
| Developed technologies | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | 15.9 |
|
| Customer relationships | 2.2 |
| | 2.8 |
|
| Trade name | 1.7 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| Goodwill | 73.4 |
| | 67.0 |
|
| Deferred tax (liability) asset | (6.2 | ) | | 0.7 |
|
| Net tangible assets | — |
| | 1.5 |
|
| Total | $ | 87.0 |
| | $ | 89.7 |
|
6. Deferred Compensation
At January 31, 20152017, Autodesk had marketable securities totaling $888.8993.0 million, of which $40.347.3 million related to investments in debt and equity securities that are held in a rabbi trust under non-qualified deferred compensation plans. The total related deferred compensation liability was $40.347.3 million at January 31, 20152017, of which $5.33.1 million was classified as current and $35.044.2 million was classified as non-current liabilities. The value of debt and equity securities held in the rabbi trust at January 31, 2014 was $38.9 million. The total related deferred compensation liability at January 31, 20142016 was $38.938.0 million, of which $1.9 million was classified as current and $37.036.1 million was classified as non-current liabilities. The securities are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the current portion of "Marketable Securities"securities". The current and non-current portions of the liability are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Accrued compensation” and “Other liabilities,” respectively.
7. Borrowing Arrangements
In June 2015, Autodesk issued $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due June 15, 2020 and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due June 15, 2025 (collectively, the “2015 Notes”). Autodesk received net proceeds of $742.0 million from issuance of the 2015 Senior Notes, net of a discount of $1.7 million and issuance costs of $6.3 million. Both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the 2015 Notes using the effective interest method. The proceeds of the 2015 Notes are available for general corporate purposes. Autodesk may redeem the 2015 Notes at any time, subject to a make whole premium. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events, Autodesk may be required to repurchase the 2015 Notes, at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. The 2015 Notes contain restrictive covenants that limit Autodesk's ability to create certain liens, to enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions and to consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets, subject to significant qualifications and exceptions. Based on quoted market prices, the fair value of the 2015 Notes was approximately $768.1 million as of January 31, 2017.
In December 2012, Autodesk issued $400.0$400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.95% senior notes due December 15, 2017 and $350.0$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.6% senior notes due December 15, 2022, (collectively, the "Senior"2012 Notes"). Autodesk received net proceeds of $739.3 million from issuance of the Senior2012 Notes, net of a discount of $4.5 million and issuance costs of $6.1 million. Both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the Senior2012 Notes using the effective interest method. The proceeds of the Senior2012 Notes are available for general corporate purposes. Autodesk may redeem the Senior2012 Notes at any time, subject to a make whole premium. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events, Autodesk may be required to repurchase the Senior2012 Notes, at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. The Senior2012 Notes contain restrictive covenants that limit ourAutodesk's ability to create certain liens, to enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions and to consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer, or lease all or substantially all of our assets, subject to significant qualifications and exceptions. Based on quoted market prices, the fair value of the Senior2012 Notes was approximately $759.9758.6 million as of January 31, 20152017.
Autodesk’s line of credit facility permits unsecured short-term borrowings of up to $400.0 million with an option to request an increase in the amount of the credit facility by up to an additional $100.0 million, and is available for working capital or other business needs. This credit agreement contains customary covenants that could restrict the imposition of liens on Autodesk’s assets, and restrict the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness or make dispositions of assets if Autodesk fails to maintain the financial covenants. The financial covenants consist of a leverage ratio, and an interest coverage ratio. As a result of the business model transition, we would not have complied with the leverage ratio requirement of the credit agreement at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and obtained a waiver for that period. The line of credit is syndicated with various financial institutions, including Citibank, N.A., an affiliate of Citigroup, which is one of the lead lenders and an agent. AsThe maturity date on the line of credit facility is May 2020. At January 31, 2015, we were in compliance with the credit facility’s covenants.The credit facility expires in May 2018. At 2017, and January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2014,2016, Autodesk had no outstanding borrowings on this line of credit.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease commitments
Autodesk leases office space and computer equipment under non-cancellable operating lease agreements that expire at various dates through 20882090. The leases generally provide that Autodesk pay taxes, insurance, and maintenance expenses related to the leased assets. Certain of these lease arrangements contain escalation clauses whereby monthly rent increases over time.
At January 31, 20152017, the aggregate future minimum lease payments required were as follows:
| | | | | |
| 2016 | $ | 55.4 |
| |
| 2017 | 47.3 |
| |
| 2018 | 40.7 |
| $ | 60.7 |
|
| 2019 | 29.1 |
| 48.4 |
|
| 2020 | 19.5 |
| 31.4 |
|
| 2021 | | 21.1 |
|
| 2022 | | 12.2 |
|
| Thereafter | 32.6 |
| 41.2 |
|
| | 224.6 |
| 215.0 |
|
| Less: Sublease income | 1.9 |
| 2.5 |
|
| | $ | 222.7 |
| $ | 212.5 |
|
Rent expense related to these operating leases recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease period, was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Rent expense | $ | 55.0 |
| | $ | 50.2 |
| | $ | 56.1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Rent expense | $ | 65.3 |
| | $ | 58.7 |
| | $ | 55.0 |
|
Purchase commitments
In the normal course of business, Autodesk enters into various purchase commitments for goods or services. Total non-cancellable purchase commitments as of January 31, 20152017 were approximately $85.4166.4 millionfor periods through fiscal 2020.2020. These purchase commitments primarily result from contracts for the acquisition of IT infrastructure, marketing, and software development services.
Autodesk has certain royalty commitments associated with the shipmentsale and licensing of certain products. Royalty expense is generally based on a dollar amount per unit shippedsold or a percentage of the underlying revenue. Royalty expense, which was recorded under cost of subscription revenue and cost of license and other revenue on Autodesk’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, was $16.2 million in fiscal 2017, $17.4 million in fiscal 2016, and $17.9 million in fiscal 2015, $18.0 million in fiscal 2014, and $16.4 million in fiscal 2013.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, Autodesk provides indemnifications of varying scopes, including limited product warranties and indemnification of customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of its products or services. Autodesk accrues for known indemnification issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Historically, costs related to these indemnifications have not been significant, and because potential future costs are highly variable, Autodesk is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnifications on its future results of operations.
In connection with the purchase, sale, or license of assets or businesses with third parties, Autodesk has entered into or assumed customary indemnification agreements related to the assets or businesses purchased, sold or licensed. Historically, costs related to these indemnifications have not been significant, and because potential future costs are highly variable, Autodesk is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnifications on its future results of operations.
As permitted under Delaware law, Autodesk has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at Autodesk’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments Autodesk could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited;
however, Autodesk has directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage that is intended to reduce its financial exposure and may enable Autodesk to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. Autodesk believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.
Legal Proceedings
Autodesk is involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations, and proceedings in the normal course of business activities including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, piracy prosecution, business practices, and other matters. Autodesk routinely reviews the status of each significant matter and assesses its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any matter is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, Autodesk records a liability for the estimated loss. Because of inherent uncertainties related to these legal matters, Autodesk bases its loss accruals on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, Autodesk reassesses its potential liability and may revise its estimates. In the Company's opinion, resolution of pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or its financial position. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, there is a reasonable possibility that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial position in a particular period, however, based on the information known by the Company as of the date of this filing and the rules and regulations applicable to the preparation of the Company's financial statements, any such amount is either immaterial or it is not possible to provide an estimated amount of any such potential loss.
9. Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock
Under Autodesk’s Certificate of Incorporation, 2.0 million shares of preferred stock are authorized. At January 31, 20152017, there were no preferred shares issued or outstanding. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the preferred stock in one or more series and to fix rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including dividends and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by the stockholders.
Common Stock Repurchase ProgramsProgram
Autodesk has a stock repurchase program that is used to offset dilution from the issuance of stock under the Company’s employee stock plans and for such other purposes as may be in the interests of Autodesk and its stockholders, which has the effect of returning excess cash generated from the Company’s business to stockholders. Autodesk repurchased and retired approximately 9.7 million shares in fiscal 2017 at an average repurchase price of $64.73 per share, 8.5 million shares in fiscal 2016 at an average repurchase price of $53.58 per share, and 6.9 million shares in fiscal 2015 at an average repurchase price of $53.83 per share, 10.5 million shares in fiscal 2014 at an average repurchase price of $40.43 per share, and 12.5 million shares in fiscal 2013 at an average repurchase price of $34.50.
At January 31, 20152017, 14.826.6 million shares remained available for repurchase under the repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors.Directors, including the 30.0 million share increase approved by the Board of Directors in September 2016. The number of shares acquiredshare repurchase program does not have an expiration date and the pace and timing of repurchases will depend on factors such as cash generation from operations, available surplus, the purchases are based on several factors, including general market and economic conditions, the numbervolume of employee stock option exercises and stock issuances, the trading price of Autodesk common stock, cash on hand and available in the United States,plan activity, cash requirements for acquisitions, economic and Company defined trading windows.market conditions, stock price and legal and regulatory requirements.
10. Interest and Other (Expense) Income,Expense, net
Interest and other (expense) income,expense, net, consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Interest and investment (expense) income, net | $ | (13.2 | ) | | $ | (9.8 | ) | | $ | 4.9 |
|
| (Loss) gain on foreign currency | (3.9 | ) | | 4.0 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| Loss on strategic investments | (23.3 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | | (4.0 | ) |
| Other income | 2.7 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Interest and other (expense) income, net | $ | (37.7 | ) | | $ | (4.9 | ) | | $ | 4.1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Interest and investment expense, net | $ | (29.7 | ) | | $ | (33.9 | ) | | $ | (13.2 | ) |
| Loss on foreign currency | (3.3 | ) | | — |
| | (3.9 | ) |
| Gain (loss) on strategic investments | 0.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| | (23.3 | ) |
| Other income | 8.5 |
| | 8.5 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| Interest and other expense, net | $ | (24.2 | ) | | $ | (21.6 | ) | | $ | (37.7 | ) |
11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, was comprisedconsisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available for Sale Securities | | Defined Benefit Pension Components | | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | | Total (1) |
| Balances, January 31, 2013 | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | (13.1 | ) | | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | (5.7 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 11.1 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 3.9 |
| | (2.0 | ) | | 12.8 |
|
| Pre-tax (gains) losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | (11.5 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | (11.8 | ) |
| Tax effects | 1.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 4.1 |
|
| Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | 0.7 |
| | (1.1 | ) | | 5.4 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| Balances, January 31, 2014 | 3.5 |
| | 1.8 |
| | (7.7 | ) | | 1.8 |
| | (0.6 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 47.0 |
| | (1.7 | ) | | (18.3 | ) | | (80.7 | ) | | (53.7 | ) |
| Pre-tax (gains) losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | (7.0 | ) | | 1.7 |
| | 0.5 |
| | — |
| | (4.8 | ) |
| Tax effects | (0.7 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | 1.8 |
| | 4.9 |
| | 5.8 |
|
| Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | 39.3 |
|
| (0.2 | ) |
| (16.0 | ) |
| (75.8 | ) | | (52.7 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2015 | $ | 42.8 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | (23.7 | ) | | $ | (74.0 | ) | | $ | (53.3 | ) |
(1) For comparability, the presentation of prior period balances were adjusted to align with current year presentation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available for Sale Securities | | Defined Benefit Pension Components | | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | | Total |
| Balances, January 31, 2015 | $ | 42.8 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | (23.7 | ) | | $ | (74.0 | ) | | $ | (53.3 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 1.6 |
| | (1.3 | ) | | (6.8 | ) | | (35.2 | ) | | (41.7 | ) |
| Pre-tax (gains) losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | (29.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | 1.3 |
| | — |
| | (28.1 | ) |
| Tax effects | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | (27.1 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | | (34.7 | ) | | (67.8 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2016 | 15.7 |
| | 0.2 |
| | (28.3 | ) | | (108.7 | ) | | (121.1 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 7.4 |
| | 3.3 |
| | (5.8 | ) | | (52.3 | ) | | (47.4 | ) |
| Pre-tax (gains) losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | (7.4 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | 1.2 |
| | — |
| | (7.7 | ) |
| Tax effects | (1.1 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | | 0.2 |
| | (2.3 | ) |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | (1.1 | ) | | 1.3 |
| | (5.5 | ) | | (52.1 | ) | | (57.4 | ) |
| Balances, January 31, 2017 | $ | 14.6 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | (33.8 | ) | | $ | (160.8 | ) | | $ | (178.5 | ) |
Reclassifications related to gains and losses on available for saleavailable-for-sale securities are included in Interest and other (expense) income,expense, net. Refer to "Note 2: FinancialNote 2, "Financial Instruments" for the amount and location of reclassifications related to derivative instruments. Reclassifications of the defined benefit pension components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. Refer to "Note 14: RetirementNote 14, "Retirement Benefit Plans."
12. Net (Loss) Income Per Share
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, excluding stock options and restricted stock units.stock. Diluted net (loss) income per share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period and potentially dilutive common shares, including the effect of stock options and restricted stock units under the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted net (loss) income per share amounts:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Numerator: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 81.8 |
| | $ | 228.8 |
| | $ | 247.4 |
|
| Denominator: | | | | | |
| Denominator for basic net income per share—weighted average shares | 227.1 |
| | 224.0 |
| | 226.4 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities | 5.3 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 5.3 |
|
| Denominator for dilutive net income per share | 232.4 |
| | 229.6 |
| | 231.7 |
|
| Basic net income per share | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| | $ | 1.09 |
|
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Numerator: | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (582.1 | ) | | $ | (330.5 | ) | | $ | 81.8 |
|
| Denominator: | | | | | |
| Denominator for basic net (loss) income per share—weighted average shares | 222.7 |
| | 226.0 |
| | 227.1 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 5.3 |
|
| Denominator for dilutive net (loss) income per share | 222.7 |
| | 226.0 |
| | 232.4 |
|
| Basic net (loss) income per share | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.36 |
|
| Diluted net (loss) income per share | $ | (2.61 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) | | $ | 0.35 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | The effect of dilutive securities of 4.6 million and 4.7 million shares for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net (loss) income per share as those shares would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred during these fiscal years. |
The computation of diluted net (loss) income per share does not include shares that are anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method because their exercise prices are higher than the average market value of Autodesk’s stock during the fiscal year. For each of the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013, 2015, 0.1 million, 5.4 million, and 9.6 million potentially anti-dilutive shares respectively, were excluded from the computation of net (loss) income per share.
13. Segments
Autodesk reports segment information based on the “management” approach. The management approach designates the internal reporting used by management for making decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance as the source of the Company’s reportable segments. Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2017, Autodesk hashad four reportableoperating segments: AEC, MFG, PSEB, MFG, and M&E. Autodesk has no material inter-segment revenue.
The AEC, PSEB, and MFG segments derive revenue from the saleAs a result of licenses for software products and services to customers who design, build, manage, or own building, manufacturing, and infrastructure projects. Autodesk's M&E segment derives revenue from the sale of products to creative professionals, post-production facilities, and broadcasters for a variety of applications, including feature films, television programs, commercials, music and corporate videos, interactive game production, web design, and interactive web streaming.
AEC software products help to improve the way building, civil infrastructure, process plant, and construction projects are designed, built, and managed. A broad portfolio of solutions enables greater efficiency, accuracy, and sustainability across the entire project lifecycle. Autodesk AEC solutions include advanced technology for BIM, AutoCAD-based design and documentation productivity software, sustainable design analysis applications, and collaborative project management solutions. BIM, an integrated process for building and infrastructure design, analysis, documentation, and construction, uses consistent, coordination information to improve communication and collaboration between the extended project team. AEC provides a comprehensive portfolio of BIM solutions that help customers deliver projects faster and more economically, while minimizing environmental impact. AEC’s revenue primarily includes revenue from the sales of licenses of Autodesk Building Design Suites, Autodesk Revit, Autodesk Infrastructure Design Suites, AutoCAD Civil 3D, and AutoCAD Map 3D.
PSEB includes Autodesk’s design product, AutoCAD. Autodesk’s AutoCAD product is a platform product that underpins the Company’s design product offerings for the industries it serves. For example, AEC and MFG offer tailored versions of AutoCAD software for the industries they serve. Autodesk’s AutoCAD product also provides a platform for Autodesk’s developer partners to build custom solutions for a range of diverse design-oriented markets. PSEB's revenue primarily includes revenue from sales of AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT, the AutoCAD Design Suite and many other design products, including consumer design products, as well as from sales of licenses of other Autodesk's design products.
MFG provides the manufacturers in automotive and transportation, industrial machinery, consumer products and building products with comprehensive digital prototyping solutions that bring together design data from all phases of the product development process to develop a single digitalbusiness model created in Autodesk Inventor software. Autodesk’s solutions for digital prototyping enable a broad group of manufacturers to realize benefits with minimal disruption to existing workflows. MFG’s revenue primarily includes revenue from the sales of licenses of Autodesk Product Design Suites, Autodesk Inventor, AutoCAD Mechanical, and Autodesk Moldflow products.
M&E consists of two product groups: Animation, including design visualization, and Creative Finishing. Animation products, such as Autodesk 3ds Max, Autodesk Maya, and the Autodesk Entertainment Creation Suites, provide tools for digital sculpting, modeling, animation, effects, rendering and compositing, for design visualization, visual effects, and games production. M&E products are also included intransition, there have been a number of PSEB, AEC,changes in the business including a platform shift from perpetual licenses to subscription-based offerings and MFG focused suites. Creative Finishing products,organizational changes in how the business is managed including a restructuring announced in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, these organizational changes resulted in a change in the internal reporting provided to Autodesk’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) used to assess the performance of the business to focus on consolidated operating results. Accordingly, the Company's CODM now allocates resources and assesses the operating performance of the Company as a whole. As such, asbeginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, Autodesk Flame, Autodesk Smoke,concluded that it has one segment manager (the CODM), one operating segment, and Autodesk Lustre, provide editing, finishing, and visual effects design and color grading.one reporting unit for goodwill impairment purposes.
All of Autodesk’s reportable segments distribute their respective products primarily through authorized resellers and distributors and, to a lesser extent, through direct sales to end-users.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Autodesk evaluates each segment’s performance on the basis of gross profit. Autodesk currently does not separately accumulate and report asset information by segment, except for goodwill, which is disclosed in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Information concerning the operations ofregarding Autodesk’s reportable segmentsrevenue by geographic area and product family is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Net revenue: | | | | | |
| Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (1) | $ | 872.6 |
| | $ | 730.6 |
| | $ | 701.1 |
|
| Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (1) | 796.7 |
| | 789.2 |
| | 843.0 |
|
| Manufacturing | 675.6 |
| | 579.4 |
| | 573.8 |
|
| Media and Entertainment (1) | 167.3 |
| | 174.7 |
| | 194.3 |
|
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
| $ | 2,273.9 |
|
| $ | 2,312.2 |
|
| Gross profit: | | | | | |
| Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (1) | $ | 785.8 |
| | $ | 663.8 |
| | $ | 642.0 |
|
| Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (1) | 712.3 |
| | 716.8 |
| | 788.8 |
|
| Manufacturing | 604.0 |
| | 531.5 |
| | 531.3 |
|
| Media and Entertainment | 127.3 |
| | 137.8 |
| | 156.5 |
|
| Unallocated (2) | (59.3 | ) | | (50.3 | ) | | (44.9 | ) |
| | $ | 2,170.1 |
|
| $ | 1,999.6 |
|
| $ | 2,073.7 |
|
| Depreciation, amortization and accretion: | | | | | |
| Architecture, Engineering, and Construction | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
|
| Platform Solutions and Emerging Business | 6.8 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| Manufacturing | 3.0 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Media and Entertainment | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Unallocated | 134.5 |
| | 122.1 |
| | 124.9 |
|
| | $ | 145.9 |
| | $ | 128.9 |
| | $ | 127.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net revenue by geographic area (1): | | | | | |
| Americas | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 742.1 |
| | $ | 803.9 |
| | $ | 736.4 |
|
| Other Americas | 129.8 |
| | 168.9 |
| | 161.6 |
|
| Total Americas | 871.9 |
| | 972.8 |
| | 898.0 |
|
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa | 800.4 |
| | 934.6 |
| | 980.0 |
|
| Asia Pacific | 358.7 |
| | 596.7 |
| | 634.2 |
|
| Total net revenue | $ | 2,031.0 |
| | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net revenue by product family: | | | | | |
| Architecture, Engineering and Construction | $ | 880.9 |
| | $ | 949.1 |
| | $ | 872.6 |
|
| Manufacturing | 625.8 |
| | 724.6 |
| | 675.6 |
|
| AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT (2) | 326.7 |
| | 594.8 |
| | 695.1 |
|
| Media and Entertainment | 138.9 |
| | 160.0 |
| | 167.3 |
|
| Other (2) | 58.7 |
| | 75.6 |
| | 101.6 |
|
| | $ | 2,031.0 |
| | $ | 2,504.1 |
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
_________________________________
| |
(1) | Prior period segment revenue amounts have been updatedRevenue by geographic area is based on the bill to conform to the current period's presentation.country. |
| |
(2) | Unallocated amounts primarily relatePrior periods have been adjusted to corporate expenses and other costs and expenses that are managed outside the reportable segments, including stock-based compensation expense.conform with current period's presentation. |
Information regarding Autodesk’s operations by geographic area is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Net revenue: | | | | | |
| Americas | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 736.4 |
| | $ | 672.3 |
| | $ | 672.1 |
|
| Other Americas | 161.6 |
| | 146.6 |
| | 164.1 |
|
| Total Americas | 898.0 |
| | 818.9 |
| | 836.2 |
|
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa | 980.0 |
| | 851.8 |
| | 868.5 |
|
| Asia Pacific | | | | | |
| Japan | 269.0 |
| | 274.5 |
| | 278.3 |
|
| Other Asia Pacific | 365.2 |
| | 328.7 |
| | 329.2 |
|
| Total Asia Pacific | 634.2 |
| | 603.2 |
| | 607.5 |
|
| Total net revenue | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 2,273.9 |
| | $ | 2,312.2 |
|
Information regarding Autodesk’s long-lived assets by geographic area is as follows:
| | | | January 31, | January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Long-lived assets (1): | | | | | | |
| Americas | | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 108.8 |
| | $ | 89.0 |
| $ | 118.8 |
| | $ | 118.8 |
|
| Other Americas | 3.1 |
| | 2.9 |
| 5.9 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| Total Americas | 111.9 |
| | 91.9 |
| 124.7 |
| | 122.0 |
|
| Europe, Middle East, and Africa | 25.0 |
| | 27.2 |
| 18.7 |
| | 25.7 |
|
| Asia Pacific | 22.3 |
| | 11.2 |
| 15.2 |
| | 21.6 |
|
| Total long-lived assets | $ | 159.2 |
| | $ | 130.3 |
| $ | 158.6 |
| | $ | 169.3 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | Long-lived assets exclude deferred tax assets, marketable securities, goodwill, and other intangible assets. Prior period amounts have been updated to conform to the current period's presentation. |
14. Retirement Benefit Plans
Pretax Savings Plan
Autodesk has a 401(k) plan that covers nearly all U.S. employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 50% of their pretax salary, subject to limitations mandated by the Internal Revenue Service. Autodesk makes voluntary cash contributions and matches a portion of employee contributions in cash. Autodesk’s contributions were $16.4 million in fiscal 2017, $17.3 million in fiscal 2016, and $11.2 million in fiscal 2015, $8.1 million in fiscal 2014, and $7.9 million in fiscal 2013. Autodesk does not allow participants to invest in Autodesk common stock through the 401(k) plan.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Autodesk maintains certain defined benefit pension plans to employees primarily located in countries outside of the U.S, particularly the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Japan. The Company deposits funds for specific plans, consistent with the requirements of local law, with insurance companies, third-party trustees, or into government-managed accounts, and accrues for the unfunded portion of the obligation, where material. Depending on the design of the plan, local customs, and market circumstances, the liabilities of a plan may exceed qualified plan assets.
Benefit obligationObligation and plan assetsPlan Assets
The changes in the projected benefit obligations and plan assets for the plans described above were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Beginning projected benefit obligation | $ | 62.2 |
| | $ | 61.5 |
|
| Service cost | 4.6 |
| | 5.4 |
|
| Interest cost | 3.9 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Actuarial loss (gain) | 18.8 |
| | (3.2 | ) |
| Benefits paid | (7.5 | ) | | (5.9 | ) |
| Foreign currency exchange rate changes | (1.2 | ) | | 0.8 |
|
| Curtailments and settlements | (2.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Contributions by plan participants | 5.9 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Business combinations | 60.9 |
| | — |
|
| Ending projected benefit obligation | $ | 144.7 |
| | $ | 62.2 |
|
| | | | |
| Beginning fair value of plan assets | $ | 40.7 |
| | $ | 37.5 |
|
| Actual return on plan assets | 4.1 |
| | 0.9 |
|
| Contributions paid by employer | 4.9 |
| | 5.2 |
|
| Contributions paid by plan participants | 5.9 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Benefit payments | (7.5 | ) | | (5.9 | ) |
| Curtailments and settlements | (2.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Foreign currency exchange rate changes | (1.2 | ) | | 0.5 |
|
| Business combinations | 60.2 |
| | — |
|
| Ending fair value of plan assets | $ | 104.2 |
| | $ | 40.7 |
|
| Funded status | $ | (40.5 | ) | | $ | (21.5 | ) |
Amounts included within the business combinations line above represent plan assets and liabilities assumed under the acquisition of Delcam. |
| | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal year ended January 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Beginning projected benefit obligation | $ | 145.2 |
| | $ | 144.7 |
|
| Service cost | 5.6 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Interest cost | 3.0 |
| | 3.3 |
|
| Actuarial loss (gain) | 7.1 |
| | 6.3 |
|
| Benefits paid | (2.6 | ) | | (6.5 | ) |
| Foreign currency exchange rate changes | (9.5 | ) | | (10.1 | ) |
| Curtailments and settlements | (6.8 | ) | | (2.2 | ) |
| Contributions by plan participants | 4.4 |
| | 4.0 |
|
| Ending projected benefit obligation | $ | 146.4 |
| | $ | 145.2 |
|
| | | | |
| Beginning fair value of plan assets | $ | 101.4 |
| | $ | 104.2 |
|
| Actual return on plan assets | 4.2 |
| | 1.3 |
|
| Contributions paid by employer | 15.3 |
| | 4.5 |
|
| Contributions paid by plan participants | 4.4 |
| | 4.0 |
|
| Benefit payments | (2.6 | ) | | (6.5 | ) |
| Curtailments and settlements | (6.8 | ) | | — |
|
| Foreign currency exchange rate changes | (8.5 | ) | | (6.1 | ) |
| Ending fair value of plan assets | $ | 107.4 |
| | $ | 101.4 |
|
| Funded status | $ | (39.0 | ) | | $ | (43.8 | ) |
The amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at the end of each period were as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Other long-term liabilities | $ | 40.5 |
| | $ | 21.5 |
| $ | 39.0 |
| | $ | 43.8 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax | 26.6 |
| | 8.7 |
| 36.9 |
| | 32.2 |
|
| Net amount recognized | $ | 67.1 |
| | $ | 30.2 |
| $ | 75.9 |
| | $ | 76.0 |
|
On a worldwide basis, our defined benefit pension plans were 72%73% funded as of January 31, 2015. Funded status is not indicative of our ability to pay ongoing pension benefits or of Autodesk's obligation to fund retirement accounts.2017.
As of January 31, 2015,2017, the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation was $124.3$128.2 million for the defined benefit pension plans ($45.3compared to $127.1 million as of January 31, 2014).2016. Included in the aggregate data in the following tables are the amounts applicable to our defined benefit pension plans, with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets, as well as plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets. Amounts related to such plans at the end of each period were as follows:
| | | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated benefit obligations | | $ | 124.0 |
| | $ | 45.3 |
| | $ | 119.2 |
| | $ | 127.1 |
|
| Plan Assets | | 103.9 |
| | 40.7 |
| | 98.3 |
| | 101.4 |
|
| Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Projected benefit obligations | | $ | 144.7 |
| | $ | 62.2 |
| | $ | 146.4 |
| | $ | 145.2 |
|
| Plan Assets | | 104.2 |
| | 40.7 |
| | 107.4 |
| | 101.4 |
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Assets
The investments of the plans are managed by insurance companies or third-party investment managers selected by Autodesk's Trustees, consistent with regulations or market practice of the country where the assets are invested. Investments managed by qualified insurance companies or third-party investment managers under standard contracts follow local regulations, and Autodesk is not actively involved in their investment strategies.
PensionDefined benefit pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following investment categories at the end of each period as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Level 1 |
| | Level 2 |
| | Level 3 |
| | Total | | Total | Level 1 |
| | Level 2 |
| | Level 3 |
| | Total |
| | Total |
| Investment fund | $ | 55.7 |
| | $ | 4.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 60.6 |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Insurance contracts | — |
| | 43.5 |
| | — |
| | 43.5 |
| | 40.2 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 46.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 46.3 |
| | $ | 42.6 |
|
| Other investments | | — |
| | 9.4 |
| | — |
| | 9.4 |
| | — |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | 55.7 |
| | 48.4 |
| | — |
| | 104.1 |
| | 40.2 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 55.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | 55.7 |
| | 42.6 |
|
| Cash | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.5 |
| | | | | | | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Investment Fund valued using net asset value | | | | | | | | 51.7 |
| | 58.5 |
|
| Total pension plan assets at fair value | $ | 55.8 |
| | $ | 48.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 104.2 |
| | $ | 40.7 |
|
| |
| |
| | $ | 107.4 |
| | $ | 101.4 |
|
The insurance contracts in the preceding table represent the immediate cash surrender value of assets managed by qualified insurance companies. Autodesk does not have control over the target allocation or visibility of the investment strategies of those investments. Insurance contracts and investments held by insurance companies made up 43% and 42% of total plan assets as of January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016, respectively.
The assets held in the investment fund in the preceding table are invested in a diversified growth fund actively managed by Russell Investments in association with Aon Hewitt. The objective of the fund is to generate capital appreciation on a long-term basis through a diversified portfolio of investments. The fund aims to deliver equity-like returns in the medium to long term with around two-thirds the volatility of equity markets. The fair value of the assets held in the investment fund classified as Level 1 are priced daily using observable inputs for identical assets. The fair value of the assets held in the investment fund classified as Level 2 are priced monthly at net asset value with quarterly redemption attributes.without restrictions on redemption.
The insurance contracts in the preceding table represent the immediate cash surrender value of assets managed by qualified insurance companies. Autodesk does not have control over the target allocation or visibility of the investment strategies of those investments. Insurance contracts and investments held by insurance companies made up 42% of total plan assets as of January 31, 2015 (99% as of January 31, 2014).
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Estimated benefit payments over the next 10 fiscal years are as follows:
| | | | Pension Benefits | Pension Benefits |
| 2016 | $ | 3.5 |
| |
| 2017 | 3.4 |
| |
| 2018 | 3.5 |
| $ | 4.2 |
|
| 2019 | 3.3 |
| 3.8 |
|
| 2020 | 3.1 |
| 3.5 |
|
| 2021-2025 | 17.5 |
| |
| 2021 | | 3.5 |
|
| 2022 | | 3.4 |
|
| 2023-2027 | | 19.1 |
|
Funding Expectations
Our expected required funding for the plans during fiscal 20162018 is approximately $4.6$4.3 million.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The components of net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit pension plans for fiscal 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015 are as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Service cost for benefits earned during the period | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 4.5 |
| $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | 5.7 |
| | $ | 4.6 |
|
| Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 3.9 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 1.3 |
| 3.0 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 3.9 |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | (4.6 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| (0.8 | ) | (4.2 | ) | | (3.9 | ) |
| (4.6 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service credit | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Amortization of loss | 0.6 |
|
| 1.0 |
|
| 0.7 |
| 1.5 |
|
| 1.4 |
|
| 0.6 |
|
| Settlement loss | | 1.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 4.4 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| $ | 6.8 |
| | $ | 6.4 |
| | $ | 4.4 |
|
Amounts Recorded in OCI
The components of other comprehensive income for the defined benefit pension plans before taxes for fiscal 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015 are as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Prior service credit for period | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2.2 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Effect of settlement | | (1.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net loss (gain) for period | $ | 18.4 |
| | $ | (3.9 | ) | | $ | 6.3 |
| 7.2 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 18.4 |
|
| Amortization of prior service credit | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| 0.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Amortization of net loss | (0.6 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | (1.7 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | (0.6 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss (income) | $ | 17.9 |
| | $ | (4.8 | ) | | $ | 5.7 |
| $ | 4.7 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | 17.9 |
|
Amounts Recorded in AOCI
The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income loss before taxes at the end of each period were as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net prior service credit | $ | (1.8 | ) | | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | (3.6 | ) | | $ | (3.9 | ) |
| Net actuarial loss | 28.4 |
| | 10.6 |
| 40.5 |
| | 36.1 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax | $ | 26.6 |
| | $ | 8.7 |
| $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 32.2 |
|
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year for the qualified defined benefit pension plan and other benefit plans are as follows:
| | | | Pension Benefits | Pension Benefits |
| Amortization of prior service credit | $ | 0.1 |
| $ | 0.3 |
|
| Amortization of the net loss | (1.5 | ) | (0.3 | ) |
| Total amortization | $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | — |
|
Assumptions
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine costs for the plans for each period were as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Discount rate | 3.3 | % | | 2.3 | % | | 1.8 | % | 3.2 | % | | 3.2 | % | | 3.3 | % |
| Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | 3.9 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 2.0 | % | 4.3 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 3.9 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase | 2.2 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 2.1 | % | 2.2 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 2.2 | % |
The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return for the plan assets is 3.9%4.3%. The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on the interest rates guaranteed under the insurance contracts, and the expected rate of return appropriate for each category of assets weighted for the distribution within the diversified investment fund. The assumptions used for the plans are based upon customary rates and practices for the location of the plans. Factors such as asset class allocations, long-term rates of return (actual and expected), and results of periodic asset liability modeling studies are considered when constructing the long-term rate of return assumption for our defined benefit pension plans.
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for the plans at the end of each period were as follows:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Discount rate | 2.4 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 1.8 | % | 1.7 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 2.4 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase | 1.2 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 2.0 | % | 2.6 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 1.2 | % |
In selecting the appropriate discount rate for the plans, the Company uses country-specific information, adjusted to reflect the duration of the particular plan. The discount rate was based on highly rated long-term bond indexes and yield curves that match the duration of the plan’s benefit obligations.
Defined Contribution Plans
Autodesk also provides defined contribution plans in certain foreign countries where required by statute. Autodesk’s funding policy for foreign defined contribution plans is consistent with the local requirements in each country. Autodesk’s contributions to these plans were $26.6 million in fiscal 2017, $23.0 million in fiscal 2016, and $23.5 million in fiscal 2015, $22.3 million in fiscal 2014, and $21.5 million in fiscal 2013.
Other Plans
In addition, Autodesk offers a non-qualified deferred compensation plan to certain key employees whereby they may defer a portion (or all) of their annual compensation until retirement or a different date specified by the employee in accordance with terms of the plan. See Note 6, “Deferred Compensation,” for further discussion.
15. Restructuring Reservescharges and other facility exit costs, net
During fiscal 2014,2017, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a world-wide restructuring plan (“Fiscal 2017 Plan”) in order to re-balance staffing levels and reduce operating expenses to better align them with the evolving needs of the Company's business. The Company authorizedrestructuring plan included a reduction of approximately 85840 positions and the consolidation of four18 leased facilities, with a total cost of approximately $15.0facilities. During fiscal 2017, restructuring charges under the Fiscal 2017 Plan included $63.3 million ("Fiscal 2014 Plan").in employee termination benefits and $7.6 million in lease termination and other exit costs. By JulyJanuary 31, 2014,2017, the personnel and facilities related actions included in this restructuring plan were substantially complete.
Other costs primarily consist of legal, consulting, and other costs related to employee terminations and are expensed when incurred. During fiscal 2013,2017, we incurred $9.6 million in lease termination costs not related to the Board of Directors of the Company approved a world-wide restructuring plan in line with the Company's strategy, including its continuing shift to cloud and mobile computing ("Fiscal 2013 Plan"). The approved plan resulted in a reduction of approximately 500 positions and the consolidation of eight leased facilities, with an aggregate charge of $46.2 million to date. By January 31, 2014, the personnel and facilities related actions included in this restructuring plan were substantially complete.2017 Plan.
The following table setstables set forth the restructuring activities forcharges and other facility exit costs, net during the fiscal years ended January 31, 20152017 and 20142016:
| | | | Balances, January 31, 2014 | | Additions | | Payments | | Adjustments (1) | | Balances, January 31, 2015 | Balances, January 31, 2016 | | Additions | | Payments | | Adjustments (1) | | Balances, January 31, 2017 |
| Fiscal 2017 Plan | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee terminations costs | | $ | — |
| | $ | 63.3 |
| | $ | (62.2 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.1 |
|
| Facility terminations and other exit costs | |
|
| | 7.1 |
| | (3.2 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | | 1.9 |
|
| Other Facility Termination Costs | | | | | | | | | | |
| Facility termination costs | | — |
| | 7.4 |
| | (1.8 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | 4.5 |
|
| Fiscal 2014 Plan | | | | | | | | | | |
| Facility termination and other exit costs | | 1.2 |
| | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | 0.9 |
|
| Fiscal 2013 Plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee termination costs | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| |
| Lease termination and asset costs | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.3 | ) | |
|
| | 0.2 |
| |
| Fiscal 2014 Plan | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee termination costs | 3.5 |
| | 2.5 |
| | (6.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| |
| Lease termination and asset costs | 1.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | 0.3 |
| | 1.4 |
| |
| Facility termination and other exit costs | | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 5.1 |
| | $ | 3.1 |
| | $ | (6.8 | ) | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 77.8 |
| | $ | (67.6 | ) | | $ | (3.1 | ) | | $ | 8.4 |
|
| Current portion (2) | $ | 4.0 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 0.7 |
| $ | 0.8 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 6.6 |
|
| Non-current portion (2) | 1.1 |
| | | | | | | | 0.9 |
| 0.5 |
| | | | | | | | 1.8 |
|
| Total | $ | 5.1 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 1.6 |
| $ | 1.3 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 8.4 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | Adjustments include the impact of change in estimates, computer equipment, software, furniture, straight-line rent and leasehold improvement write-offs, and foreign currency translation. |
| |
| (2) | The current and non-current portions of the reserve are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Other accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities,” respectively. |
| | | | Balances, January 31, 2013 | | Additions | | Payments | | Adjustments (1) | | Balances, January 31, 2014 | Balances, January 31, 2015 | | Additions | | Payments | | Adjustments (1) | | Balances, January 31, 2016 |
| Fiscal 2013 Plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee termination costs | $ | 4.5 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | (5.0 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
| |
| Lease termination and asset costs | 2.8 |
| | 1.5 |
| | (4.2 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| |
| Facility termination and other exit costs | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
| Fiscal 2014 Plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee termination costs | — |
| | 9.4 |
| | (5.7 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | 3.5 |
| |
| Lease termination and asset costs | — |
| | 1.1 |
| | | | 0.2 |
| | 1.3 |
| |
| Facility termination and other exit costs | | 1.4 |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | | 0.2 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| Total | $ | 7.3 |
| | $ | 12.8 |
| | $ | (14.9 | ) | | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 5.1 |
| $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
|
| Current portion (2) | $ | 5.8 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 4.0 |
| $ | 0.7 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 0.8 |
|
| Non-current portion (2) | 1.5 |
| | | | | | | | 1.1 |
| 0.9 |
| | | | | | | | 0.5 |
|
| Total | $ | 7.3 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 5.1 |
| $ | 1.6 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 1.3 |
|
_______________
| |
| (1) | Adjustments include the impact of foreign currency translation. |
| |
| (2) | The current and non-current portions of the reserve are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Other accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities,” respectively. |
16. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial information for fiscal 20152017 and 20142016 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | 1st quarter | | 2nd quarter | | 3rd quarter | | 4th quarter | | Fiscal year |
| Net revenue | $ | 592.5 |
| | $ | 637.1 |
| | $ | 618.0 |
| | $ | 664.6 |
| | $ | 2,512.2 |
|
| Gross profit | 513.8 |
| | 549.2 |
| | 532.0 |
| | 575.1 |
| | 2,170.1 |
|
| Income from operations | 42.2 |
| | 49.9 |
| | 14.6 |
| | 14.0 |
| | 120.7 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | (7.3 | ) | | (11.6 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | | 18.6 |
| | (1.2 | ) |
| Net income | 28.3 |
| | 31.3 |
| | 10.7 |
| | 11.5 |
| | 81.8 |
|
| Basic net income per share | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 0.14 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
|
| Income from operations includes the following items: | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 33.6 |
| | $ | 39.8 |
| | $ | 43.1 |
| | $ | 49.1 |
| | $ | 165.6 |
|
| Amortization of acquisition related intangibles | 23.9 |
| | 24.6 |
| | 22.6 |
| | 21.9 |
| | 93.0 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 2.3 |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.1 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | 1st quarter | | 2nd quarter | | 3rd quarter | | 4th quarter | | Fiscal year |
| Net revenue | $ | 570.4 |
| | $ | 561.7 |
| | $ | 555.2 |
| | $ | 586.6 |
| | $ | 2,273.9 |
|
| Gross profit | 502.9 |
| | 493.9 |
| | 488.1 |
| | 514.7 |
| | 1,999.6 |
|
| Income from operations | 81.4 |
| | 83.6 |
| | 68.1 |
| | 51.7 |
| | 284.8 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | (17.0 | ) | | (20.1 | ) | | (11.6 | ) | | (2.4 | ) | | (51.1 | ) |
| Net income | 55.6 |
| | 61.7 |
| | 57.6 |
| | 53.9 |
| | 228.8 |
|
| Basic net income per share | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
|
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
| | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 0.23 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
|
| Income from operations includes the following items: | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 33.5 |
| | $ | 31.0 |
| | $ | 31.6 |
| | $ | 36.1 |
| | $ | 132.2 |
|
| Amortization of acquisition related intangibles | 21.6 |
| | 20.3 |
| | 18.2 |
| | 20.6 |
| | 80.7 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 0.4 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 6.3 |
| | 12.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2017 | 1st quarter (1) | | 2nd quarter | | 3rd quarter | | 4th quarter | | Fiscal year |
| Net revenue | $ | 511.9 |
| | $ | 550.7 |
| | $ | 489.6 |
| | $ | 478.8 |
| | $ | 2,031.0 |
|
| Gross profit | 419.5 |
| | 465.6 |
| | 408.1 |
| | 395.9 |
| | 1,689.1 |
|
| Loss from operations | (149.7 | ) | | (62.9 | ) | | (119.9 | ) | | (167.1 | ) | | (499.6 | ) |
| Provision for income taxes | (14.4 | ) | | (25.2 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | (5.2 | ) | | (58.3 | ) |
| Net loss | (167.7 | ) | | (98.2 | ) | | (142.8 | ) | | (173.4 | ) | | (582.1 | ) |
| Basic net loss per share | $ | (0.75 | ) | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | (0.64 | ) | | $ | (0.78 | ) | | $ | (2.61 | ) |
| Diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.75 | ) | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | (0.64 | ) | | $ | (0.78 | ) | | $ | (2.61 | ) |
| Loss from operations includes the following items: | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 51.6 |
| | $ | 54.3 |
| | $ | 56.6 |
| | $ | 59.3 |
| | $ | 221.8 |
|
| Amortization of acquisition related intangibles | 18.8 |
| | 18.5 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 17.3 |
| | 71.8 |
|
| Restructuring charges and other facility exit costs, net | 52.3 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 9.0 |
| | 80.5 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2016 | 1st quarter | | 2nd quarter (2) | | 3rd quarter | | 4th quarter | | Fiscal year |
| Net revenue | $ | 646.5 |
| | $ | 609.5 |
| | $ | 599.8 |
| | $ | 648.3 |
| | $ | 2,504.1 |
|
| Gross profit | 554.7 |
| | 516.5 |
| | 508.8 |
| | 553.4 |
| | 2,133.4 |
|
| Income (loss) from operations | 21.5 |
| | 4.3 |
| | (14.8 | ) | | (9.7 | ) | | 1.3 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | (2.7 | ) | | (269.5 | ) | | (21.3 | ) | | (16.7 | ) | | (310.2 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | 19.1 |
| | (268.6 | ) | | (43.8 | ) | | (37.2 | ) | | (330.5 | ) |
| Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) |
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (1.46 | ) |
| Income (loss) from operations includes the following items: | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 50.2 |
| | $ | 40.7 |
| | $ | 50.2 |
| | $ | 56.1 |
| | $ | 197.2 |
|
| Amortization of acquisition related intangibles | 22.4 |
| | 20.2 |
| | 19.7 |
| | 19.9 |
| | 82.2 |
|
____________________
| |
| (1) | Certain first quarter fiscal 2017 balances have been revised to reflect the adoption of ASU 2016-09. As the adoption occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we are required to reflect any adjustments as of February 1, 2016, the beginning of the annual period that includes the interim period of adoption, and are required to revise our reported quarterly results for the first quarter. The revision resulted in a $5.3 million decrease of stock-based compensation expense from the previously reported expense. See Note 1, "Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion on the adoption. |
| |
| (2) | Certain second quarter fiscal 2016 balances have been revised to include the correction of an error identified in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, resulting in an additional $33.1 million of income tax expense from the previously reported results, primarily related to the establishment of a valuation allowance. See Note 1, "Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion. |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Autodesk, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Autodesk, Inc. as of January 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2015.2017. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Autodesk, Inc. at January 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2015,2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Autodesk, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 18, 201521, 2017 expressed an unqualifiedadverse opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Francisco, California
March 18, 201521, 2017
20152017 Form 10-K 100104
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Autodesk, Inc.
We have audited Autodesk, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Autodesk, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicatedA material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, didsuch that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not include the internal controls of Delcam, plc, which isbe prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment. Management has identified a material weakness in controls related to the 2015 consolidated financial statements of Autodesk, Inc. and constituted 6 percent of total assets as of January 31, 2015 and 2 percent of revenues, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Autodesk, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Delcam plc.
In our opinion, Autodesk, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.
Company's income tax process. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Autodesk, Inc. as of January 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 20152017. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of Autodesk, Inc.audit tests applied in our audit of the fiscal 2017 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 18, 201521, 2017, which expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.on those financial statements.
In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Autodesk, Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Francisco, California
March 18, 201521, 2017
20152017 Form 10-K 101105
| |
| ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
| |
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to Autodesk management, evaluated,including our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K as required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act.10-K. Based onupon this evaluation, our ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e)were not effective as of January 31, 2017 for reasons described below.
We have performed additional analyses and other procedures to enable management to conclude that, notwithstanding the existence of the Exchange Act) are effective atmaterial weakness described above, the reasonable assurance levelconsolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP. Additionally, corrective actions continue to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submitaddress the internal control material weakness as described below under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and (ii) is accumulated and communicatedsection "Remediation Efforts with Respect to Autodesk’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the quarter ended January 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.Material Weakness".
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2015.2017. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework.Framework. Our management, including our ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Autodesk have been detected.
In accordance with guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their final assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the first fiscal year in which the acquisition occurred. Our management’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting excluded the internal control activities of Delcam plc (Delcam), which we acquired February 6, 2014, as discussed in Note 5, “Acquisitions,” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have included the financial results of Delcam in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Total revenues subject to Delcam’s internal control over financial reporting represented 2 percent of our consolidated total revenues for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015. Total assets subject to Delcam’s internal control over financial reporting represented 6 percent of our consolidated total assets as of January 31, 2015.
Our management has concluded that, as of January 31, 2015,2017, our internal control over financial reporting iswas not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.principles due to the material weakness discussed in further detail below. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young, LLP, has issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is included in Item 8 herein.
In connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017, our management concluded that it has a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the operating effectiveness of our controls over the calculation of income tax expense. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Remediation Efforts with Respect to Material Weakness
Management first identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting in connection with the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2015. Since that time, management’s remediation activities have included the following:
20152017 Form 10-K 102106
enhanced our technical accounting review for complex income tax considerations;
enhanced the design of our income tax controls to include specific activities to ensure proper classification of deferred taxes and calculation of income tax expense;
supplemented our accounting and tax professionals with the engagement of an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist us in the technical review regarding the application of tax rules around deferred tax assets and liabilities; and
reorganized the structure of our tax function to enhance the level of documentation, technical oversight, and review.
Management has enhanced its controls to include refinements and improvements to controls over the accounting for income taxes. While significant progress has been made as of January 31, 2017, management does not believe these controls are operating effectively. As a result, management does not believe that the material weakness has been remediated and will continue to enhance its controls over the accounting for income tax expense.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than with respect to the remediation efforts described above, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended January 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
| |
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
20152017 Form 10-K 103107
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report because we intend to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report (the “Proxy Statement”) and certain information included therein is incorporated herein by reference. Only those sections of the Proxy Statement that specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated by reference.
| |
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Proposal One—Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following sets forth certain information as of March 18, 201521, 2017 regarding our executive officers.
|
| | | |
| Name | Age | | Position |
Carl BassAndrew Anagnost | 5752 | | PresidentCo-CEO, Chief Marketing Officer and SVP, BSM |
| Amar Hanspal | 53 | | Co-CEO, Chief ExecutiveProduct Officer and SVP, PDG |
| R. Scott Herren | 5355 | | Senior Vice PresidentSVP and Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan Becker | 6264 | | Senior Vice President,SVP, Chief Human Resources Officer and Corporate Real Estate |
| Steve M. Blum | 5052 | | Senior Vice President,SVP, Worldwide Sales and Services |
| Pascal W. Di Fronzo | 5052 | | Senior Vice President, General Counsel andSVP, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary |
Carl BassAndrew Anagnost joined Autodesk in September 19931997 and has served as our co-CEO since February 2017 and as our Senior Vice President, Industry Strategy & Marketing since March 2012. From December 2009 to March 2012, Dr. Anagnost was Vice President, Product Suites and Chief Executive Officer since May 2006. Mr. BassWeb Services. Prior to this position, Dr. Anagnost served as Interim Chief Financial OfficerVice President of CAD/CAE products for the manufacturing division from August 2014March 2007 to December 2009. Previously, Dr. Anagnost held other senior management positions at Autodesk. Prior to joining Autodesk, Dr. Anagnost held various engineering, sales, marketing and product management positions at Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company and EXA Corporation. He also served as an NRC post-doctoral fellow at NASA Ames Research Center.
Amar Hanspal joined Autodesk in June 1987 and has served as our co-CEO since February 2017 and as our Senior Vice President, Autodesk Product Group since November 2015. From February 2012 to November 2014 and August 2008 to April 2009. From June 2004 to April 2006,2015, Mr. Bass served as Chief Operating Officer. From February 2002 to June 2004, Mr. BassHanspal served as Senior Executive Vice President, DesignInformation Modeling & Platform Product Group. Prior to this position, Mr. Hanspal served as Senior Vice President, Platform Solutions Group. From August 2001and Emerging Business from January 2007 to February 2002, Mr. Bass served2012 and as Executive Vice President Emerging Business and Chief Strategy Officer. From June 1999of Autodesk Collaboration Solutions from January 2003 to July 2001, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Buzzsaw.com, Inc., a spin-off from Autodesk.January 2007. Previously, Mr. Bass has alsoHanspal held other executive and non-executive positions withinat Autodesk. Mr. Bass was a director of McAfee, Inc. from January 2008 until its acquisition by Intel Corporation in February 2011. Mr. Bass has served on the board of directors of E2open, Inc. since July 2011.
R. Scott Herren joined Autodesk in November 2014 and serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Autodesk, Mr. Herren was the Senior Vice President of Finance for Citrix Systems, Inc. from September 2011 to October 2014 where he led the company’s finance, accounting, tax, treasury, investor relations, real estate, and facilities teams. From March 2000 to September 2011, Mr. Herren held a variety of leadership positions at Citrix including Vice President and Managing Director for EMEA and Vice President and General Manager of the Virtualization Systems Group. Prior to Citrix, Mr. Herren served at FedEx Corporation as Vice President, Financial Planning. Prior to FedEx, he spent 13 years at International Business Machines Corporation in senior financial positions.
Jan Beckerjoined Autodesk in September 1992 and has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Corporate Real Estate since December 2016. Ms. Becker served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Real Estate from June 2000.2000 to December 2016. Ms. Becker previously served in other capacities in the Human Resources Department at Autodesk. Prior to joining Autodesk, Ms. Becker held a variety of senior management positions at Sun Microsystems. Prior to Sun Microsystems, Ms. Becker worked both domestically and internationally at a number of high-tech organizations, including Activision, Digital Equipment Corporation, and Hewlett-Packard Company.
Steven M. Blum joined Autodesk in January 2003 and has served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Services since February 2011. From January 2003 to February 2011, he served as Senior Vice President of Americas Sales. Prior to this position, Blum was Executive Vice President of Sales and Account Management for Parago, Inc. Blum also held positions at Mentor Graphics, most recently serving as Vice President of America's sales. Before joining Mentor Graphics, he held engineering and sales positions at NCR Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices.
Pascal W. Di Fronzo joined Autodesk in June 1998 and has served as SVP, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary since December 2016. Mr. Di Fronzo served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary sincefrom March 2007.2007 to December 2016. From March 2006 to March 2007, Mr. Di Fronzo served as Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary, and served as Vice President, Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from March 2005 through March 2006. Previously, Mr. Di Fronzo served in other business and legal capacities in our Legal Department. Prior to joining Autodesk, he advised high technology and emerging growth companies on business and intellectual property transactions and litigation while in private practice.
There is no family relationship among any of our directors or executive officers.
| |
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Corporate Governance" and “Executive Compensation,” in our Proxy Statement.
| |
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” and “Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement.
| |
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance—Independence of the Board of Directors” in our Proxy Statement.
| |
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Proposal Two—Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement.
20152017 Form 10-K 105109
PART IV
| |
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
| |
| 1. | Financial Statements: The information concerning Autodesk’s financial statements, and Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm required by this Item is incorporated by reference herein to the section of this Report in Item 8, entitled “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” |
| |
| 2. | Financial Statement Schedule: The following financial statement schedule of Autodesk, Inc., for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, is filed as part of this Report and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Autodesk, Inc.: |
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
| |
| 3. | Exhibits: See Item 15(b) below. We have filed, or incorporated into this Report by reference, the exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K. |
(b) Exhibits:
We have filed, or incorporated into the Report by reference, the exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules: See Item 15(a), above.
| |
| ITEM 15(A)(2) | FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE II |
| | | Description | Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year | | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses or Revenues | | Deductions and Write-Offs | | Balance at End of Fiscal Year | Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year | | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses or Revenues | | Deductions and Write-Offs | | Balance at End of Fiscal Year |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 7.6 |
| | $ | (3.3 | ) | | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
|
| Product returns reserves | | 1.6 |
| | (7.7 | ) | | (6.3 | ) | | 0.2 |
|
| Partner Program reserves (1) | | 45.2 |
| | 240.3 |
| | 257.4 |
| | 28.1 |
|
| Restructuring | | 1.3 |
| | 77.8 |
| | 70.7 |
| | 8.4 |
|
| Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 6.3 |
| | $ | 2.3 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 7.6 |
|
| Product returns reserves | | 2.6 |
| | 10.4 |
| | 11.4 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Partner Program reserves (1) | | 36.5 |
| | 267.4 |
| | 258.7 |
| | 45.2 |
|
| Restructuring | | 1.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | 1.3 |
|
| Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 4.9 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 6.3 |
| $ | 4.9 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 6.3 |
|
| Product returns reserves | 4.0 |
| | 17.4 |
| | 18.8 |
| | 2.6 |
| 4.0 |
| | 17.4 |
| | 18.8 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| Partner Program reserves (1) | 38.4 |
| | 237.3 |
| | 239.2 |
| | 36.5 |
| 38.4 |
| | 237.3 |
| | 239.2 |
| | 36.5 |
|
| Restructuring | 5.6 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 1.6 |
| 5.6 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
| | $ | 4.9 |
| |
| Product returns reserves | 4.9 |
| | 23.1 |
| | 24.0 |
| | 4.0 |
| |
| Partner Program reserves (1) | 48.3 |
| | 278.6 |
| | 288.5 |
| | 38.4 |
| |
| Restructuring | 8.9 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 16.1 |
| | 5.6 |
| |
| Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 5.5 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| |
| Product returns reserves | 5.8 |
| | 25.8 |
| | 26.7 |
| | 4.9 |
| |
| Partner Program reserves (1) | 36.5 |
| | 286.9 |
| | 275.1 |
| | 48.3 |
| |
| Restructuring | 2.4 |
| | 45.1 |
| | 38.6 |
| | 8.9 |
| |
____________________
| |
| (1) | The partner program reserves balance impacts "Accounts receivable, net" and "Accounts payable" on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
None.
20152017 Form 10-K 106111
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | | AUTODESK, INC. |
| | | By: | /S/ CARL BASSs/ ANDREW ANAGNOST |
| | | | Carl BassAndrew Anagnost |
| | | | PresidentCo-CEO, Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Executive OfficerSVP, BSM |
| Dated: | March 18, 201521, 2017 | | |
|
| | | |
| | AUTODESK, INC. |
| | By: | /s/ AMAR HANSPAL |
| | | Amar Hanspal |
| | | Co-CEO, Chief Product Officer and SVP, PDG |
| Dated: | March 21, 2017 | | |
20152017 Form 10-K 107
112
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Carl BassAndrew Anagnost, Amar Hanspal, and R. Scott Herren each as his or her attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities as of March 18, 2015.21, 2017.
|
| | |
| Signature | | Title |
/s/ CARL BASSANDREW ANAGNOST | | PresidentCo-CEO, Chief Marketing Officer and SVP, BSM (Principal Executive Officer) |
| Andrew Anagnost | | |
| | |
| /s/ AMAR HANSPAL | | Co-CEO, Chief ExecutiveProduct Officer and SVP, PDG
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Carl BassAmar Hanspal | | |
| | | |
| /s/ R. SCOTT HERREN | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
| R. Scott Herren | | |
| | | |
| /s/ PAUL UNDERWOOD | | Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| Paul Underwood | | |
| | | |
| /s/ CRAWFORD W. BEVERIDGE | | Director
(Non-executive Chairman of the Board) |
| Crawford W. Beveridge | | |
| | | |
/s/ J. HALLAM DAWSONCARL BASS | | Director |
J. Hallam DawsonCarl Bass | | |
| | |
| /s/ JEFF CLARKE | | Director |
| Jeff Clarke | | |
| | |
| /s/ SCOTT FERGUSON | | Director |
| Scott Ferguson | | |
| | | |
| /s/ THOMAS GEORGENS | | Director |
| Thomas Georgens | | |
| | | |
/s/ PER-KRISTIAN HALVORSEN RICK HILL | | Director |
Per-Kristian HalvorsenRick Hill | | |
| | | |
| /s/ MARY T. MCDOWELL | | Director |
| Mary T. McDowell | | |
| | | |
| /s/ LORRIE M. NORRINGTON | | Director |
| Lorrie M. Norrington | | |
| | | |
| /s/ ELIZABETH RAFAEL | | Director |
| Elizabeth Rafael | | |
| | | |
| /s/ STACY J. SMITH | | Director |
| Stacy J. Smith | | |
| | |
/s/ STEVEN M. WEST | | Director |
Steven M. West | | |
20152017 Form 10-K 108113
Index to Exhibits
|
| | |
| Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | | |
| 3.1 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, file no. 000-14338)2006) |
| | | |
| 3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2013February 7, 2017) |
| | | |
| 4.1 | | Indenture dated December 13, 2012, by and between Autodesk, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2012) |
| | | |
| 4.2 | | First Supplemental Indenture (including Form of Notes) dated December 13, 2012, by and between Autodesk, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2012) |
| | |
| 4.3 | | Second Supplemental Indenture (including Form of Notes) dated June 5, 2015, by and between Autodesk, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2015) |
| | | |
| 10.1* | | Description of Registrant's Performance Stock Unit Program (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 201415, 2016) |
| | | |
| 10.2* | | DescriptionRegistrant’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated effective as of Registrant's Sales Commission Plan (October 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 ofExhibit 99.1 filed with the Registrant's Current ReportRegistrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-KS-8 filed on March 28, 2014September 19, 2016))
|
| | | |
| 10.3* | | Registrant’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan Forms of Subscription Agreement, as amended on June 10, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013) |
| | |
10.4* | | Registrant’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan Forms of Agreementand restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005)
|
| | |
10.5* | | Registrant’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan Form of Agreement (non-U.S. Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.5 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 20142016)
|
| | | |
10.6* | | Registrant’s 2000 Directors’ Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2008)
|
| | |
10.7* | | Registrant’s 2000 Directors’ Option Plan Forms of Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008)
|
| | |
10.8* | | Registrant’s 2006 Employee Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2005)
|
| | |
10.9* | | Registrant’s 2006 Employee Stock Plan Forms of Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 and Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2007)
|
| | |
10.10*10.4* | | Registrant’s 2008 Employee Stock Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2010) |
| | | |
10.11*10.5* | | Registrant’s 2008 Employee Stock Plan Forms of Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008) |
| | | |
10.12*10.6* | | Registrant’s 2008 Employee Stock Plan Form of Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2009) |
| | | |
10.13*10.7* | | Registrant’s 2008 Employee Stock Plan Forms of Restricted Stock Unit Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2008) |
| | | |
10.14*10.8* | | Registrant’s 2008 Employee Stock Plan Forms of Agreement (non-U.S. Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009) |
20152017 Form 10-K 109
114
|
| | |
| Exhibit No. | | Description |
10.15*10.9* | | Registrant's 2012 Employee Stock Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant's CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 201410-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2016) |
| | | |
10.16*10.10* | | Registrant's 2012 Employee Stock Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2016) |
| | |
| 10.11* | | Registrant's 2012 Employee Stock Plan Form of Severance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Registrant's CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 201210-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2016) |
| | | |
10.17*10.12* | | Registrant's 2012 Employee Stock Plan Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2012) |
| | | |
10.18*10.13* | | Registrant's 2012 Employee Stock Plan Form of Stock Option Agreement (non-U.S. Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2012) |
| | | |
10.19* | | Text of amendment to certain stock option agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2006)
|
| | |
10.20*10.14* | | Amendments to certain stock option agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009) |
| | | |
10.21*10.15* | | Registrant’s 2010 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009) |
| | | |
10.22*10.16* | | Registrant’s 2010 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2010) |
| | | |
10.23*10.17* | | Registrant’s 2010 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2010) |
| | | |
10.24*10.18* | | Registrant's 2012 Outside Directors' Stock Plan, (as amended and restatedincorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2012) (filed herewith) |
| | | |
10.25*10.19* | | Registrant's 2012 Outside Directors' Stock Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2012) |
| | | |
10.26* | | Form of Promise to Make Cash Payment and Option Amendment (U.S. Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2007)
|
| | |
10.27* | | Form of Promise to Make Cash Payment and Option Amendment (Canadian Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2007)
|
| | |
10.28*10.20* | | Registrant’s Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.23 filed with the Registrant’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 201010-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016) |
| | | |
10.29*10.21* | | Registrant’s 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2008, as further amended and restated, effective as of December 31, 2008, as further amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2009) |
| | | |
10.30*10.22* | | Participants, target awards and payout formulas for fiscal year 20152017 under the Registrant's Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 201415, 2016)
|
| | | |
10.31*10.23* | | Executive Change in Control Program, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current reportReport on Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2013December 21, 2016) |
| | | |
10.32*10.24* | | Sub-Plan of the Autodesk, Inc. 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.299.2 filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2014S-8 filed on September 19, 2016) |
| | | |
10.33*10.25* | | Form of Indemnification Agreement executed by Autodeskthe Registrant and each of its officers and directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005) |
| | | |
10.34*10.26* | | Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and Carl Bass dated March 21, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2013) |
| | | |
10.35*10.27* | | R. Scott Herren Offer Letter dated September 23, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2014) |
20152017 Form 10-K 110115
|
| | |
| Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | | |
10.36*10.28* | | Registrant’s Equity Incentive Deferral Plan as amended and restated effective as of June 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008) |
| | | |
10.37* 10.29* | | Amendment to Registrant's Equity Incentive Deferral Plan effective as of February 17, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 filed with the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012) |
| | | |
10.3810.30 | | Office Lease between Registrant and the J.H.S. Trust for 111 McInnis Parkway, San Rafael, CA, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2004) |
| | | |
10.3910.31 | | Fourth Amendment to Lease between Registrant and the J.H.S. Holdings L.P. for 111 McInnis Parkway, San Rafael, CA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010) |
| | | |
10.4010.32 | | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2013,29, 2015, by and among the Registrant, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Citibank, N.A., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2013)29, 2015) |
| | |
| 10.33 | | Letter Waiver, dated as of January 18, 2017, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2015, by and among the Registrant, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Citibank, N.A. as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 2017) |
| | |
| 10.34 | | Agreement, dated March 10, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Sachem Head Capital Management LP, Uncas GP LLC, and Sachem Head GP LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2016) |
| | |
| 10.35 | | Agreement, dated March 10, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Eminence Capital, LP, and Eminence GP, LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2016) |
| | |
| 10.36 | | Agreement, dated February 6, 2017, by and among the Registrant, Sachem Head Capital Management LP, Uncas GP LLC, and Sachem Head GP LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2017) |
| | |
| 10.37* | | Transition and Separation Agreement, dated February 6, 2017, by and between the Company and Carl Bass (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2017) |
| | | |
| 21.1 | | List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith) |
| | | |
| 23.1 | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) (filed herewith) |
| | | |
| 24.1 | | Power of Attorney (contained in the signature page to this Annual Report) |
| | | |
| 31.1 | | Certification of ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith) |
| | | |
| 31.2 | | Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith) |
| | |
| 31.3 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith) |
| | | |
| 32.1† | | Certification of ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| | | |
| 101.INS †† | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | | |
| 101.SCH †† | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| | | |
| 101.CAL †† | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| | | |
| 101.DEF †† | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| | | |
| 101.LAB †† | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| | | |
| 101.PRE †† | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
____________________
| |
| * | Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| |
| † | The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Autodesk, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. |
| |
| †† | The financial information contained in these XBRL documents is unaudited. |
20152017 Form 10-K 111117
