PART I
Item 1. Business
General
The Middleby Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Middleby” or the “company”), through its operating subsidiary Middleby Marshall Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Middleby Marshall”) and its subsidiaries, is a leader in the design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, and service of a broad line of (i) foodservice equipment used in all types of commercial restaurants and institutional kitchens, (ii) food preparation, cooking, baking, chilling and packaging equipment for food processing operations, and (iii) premium kitchen equipment including ranges, ovens, refrigerators, ventilation and dishwashers primarily used in the residential market.
Founded in 1888 as a manufacturer of baking ovens, Middleby Marshall Oven Company was acquired in 1983 by TMC Industries Ltd., a publicly traded company that changed its name in 1985 to The Middleby Corporation. The company has established itself as a leading provider of (i) commercial restaurant equipment, (ii) food processing equipment and (iii) residential kitchen equipment as a result of its acquisition of industry leading brands and through the introduction of innovative products within each of these segments.
The company's annual reports on Form 10-K, including this Form 10-K, as well as the company's quarterly reports on Form
10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on the company's internet website, www.middleby.com. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Business Segments and Products
The company conducts its business through three principal business segments: the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, the Food Processing Equipment Group and the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. See Note 910 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the company's business segments.
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
The Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group has a broad portfolio of foodservice equipment, which enable it to serve virtually any cooking, or warming, refrigeration, freezing and beverage application within a commercial kitchen or foodservice operation. This cooking and warming equipment is used across all types of foodservice operations, including quick-service restaurants, full-service restaurants, convenience stores, retail outlets, hotels and other institutions.
This commercial foodservice equipment is marketed under a portfolio of forty-onesixty brands, including Anets®, Beech®, Blodgett®,Anets, APW Wyott, Bakers Pride, Beech, BKI, Blodgett, Combi®, Blodgett Range®, Bloomfield®, Britannia®, CTX®, Carter-Hoffmann®, Celfrost®, Concordia®, CookTek®, Desmon®, Doyon®, Eswood®, Follett®, FriFri®, Giga®, Goldstein®, Holman®, Houno®, IMC®, Induc®, Jade®, Lang®, Lincat®, MagiKitch'n®,Combi, Blodgett Range, Bloomfield, Britannia, Carter-Hoffmann, Celfrost, Concordia, CookTek, Crown, CTX, Desmon, Doyon, Eswood, EVO, Firex, Follett, Frifri, Giga, Globe, Goldstein, Holman, Houno, IMC, Induc, Jade, JoeTap, Josper, L2F, Lang, Lincat, MagiKitch’n, Market Forge®, Marsal®,Forge, Marsal, Middleby Marshall®, MPC®, Nieco®, Nu-Vu®, PerfectFry®,Marshall, MPC, Nieco, Nu-Vu, PerfectFry, Pitco, Frialator®, Southbend®, Star®, Toastmaster®, TurboChef®, Wells®Powerhouse Dynamics, QualServ, Southbend, Ss Brewtech, Star, Starline, Sveba Dahlen, Synesso, Taylor, Toastmaster, TurboChef, Ultrafryer, Varimixer, Wells and Wunder-Bar®.Wunder-Bar.
The products offered by this group include conveyor ovens, combi-ovens, convection ovens, baking ovens, proofing ovens, deck ovens, speed cooking ovens, hydrovection ovens, ranges, fryers, rethermalizers, steam cooking equipment, food warming equipment, catering equipment, heated cabinets, charbroilers, ventless cooking systems, kitchen ventilation, induction cooking equipment, countertop cooking equipment, toasters, griddles, charcoal grills, professional mixers, stainless steel fabrication, custom millwork, professional refrigerators, blast chillers, coldrooms, ice machines, freezers, soft serve ice cream equipment, coffee and beverage dispensing equipment.equipment, home and professional craft brewing equipment and IoT solutions.
Food Processing Equipment Group
The Food Processing Equipment Group offers a broad portfolio of processing solutions for customers producing pre-cooked meat products, such as hot dogs, dinner sausages, poultry and lunchmeats and baked goods such as muffins, cookies and bread. Through its broad line of products, the company is able to deliver a wide array of cooking solutions to service a variety of food processing requirements demanded by its customers. The company can offer highly integrated solutions that provide a food processing operation a uniquely integrated solution providing for the highest level of food quality, product consistency, and reduced operating costs resulting from increased product yields, increased capacity, greater throughput and reduced labor costs thoughthrough automation.
This food processing equipment is marketed under a portfolio of thirteentwenty-two brands, including Alkar®,Alkar, Armor Inox®, Auto-Bake®,Inox, Auto-Bake, Baker Thermal Solutions®, Cozzini®, Danfotech®, Drake®, Maurer-Atmos®,Solutions, Burford, Cozzini, CVP Systems, Danfotech, Drake, Emico, Glimek, Hinds-Bock, Maurer-Atmos, MP Equipment®, RapidPak®,Equipment, M-TEK, Pacproinc, RapidPak, Scanico, Spooner Vicars®,Vicars, Stewart Systems®Systems, Thurne and Thurne®.Ve.Ma.C.
The products offered by this group include a wide array of cooking and baking solutions, including batch ovens, baking ovens, proofing ovens, conveyor belt ovens, continuous processing ovens, frying systems and automated thermal processing systems. The company also provides a comprehensive portfolio of complementary food preparation equipment such as grinders, slicers, emulsifiers,reduction and emulsion systems, mixers, blenders, battering equipment, breading equipment, seeding equipment, water cutting systems, food presses, food suspension equipment, filling and depositing solutions and forming equipment, as well as a variety of automated loading and unloading systems, food safety, food handling, freezing, defrosting and packaging equipment. This portfolio of equipment can be integrated to provide customers a highly efficient and customized solution.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
The Residential Kitchen Equipment Group manufactures, sells and distributes kitchen equipment for the residential market. Principal product lines of this group are ranges, cookers, stoves, ovens, refrigerators, dishwashers, microwaves, cooktops, refrigerators, wine coolers, ice machines, dishwashers, ventilation equipment and outdoor equipment. These products are sold and marketed under a portfolio of twentynineteen brands, including AGA®, AGA, Cookshop®, Brigade®, Falcon®,AGA Cookshop, Brava, EVO, Fired Earth®, Grange®, Heartland®,Earth, Heartland, La Cornue®,Cornue, Leisure Sinks®, Lynx®, Marvel®, Mercury®, Rangemaster®, Rayburn®, Redfyre®, Sedona®, Stanley®, TurboChef®, U-Line®Sinks, Lynx, Marvel, Mercury, Rangemaster, Rayburn, Redfyre, Sedona, Stanley, TurboChef, U-Line and Viking®.Viking.
Acquisition Strategy
The company has pursued a strategy to acquire and assemble a leading portfolio of brands and technologies for each of its three business segments. Over the past two years, the company has completed ninesixteen acquisitions to add to its portfolio of brands and technologies of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, the Food Processing Equipment Group and the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. These acquisitions have added twenty-twonineteen brands to the Middleby portfolio and positioned the company as a leading provider of equipment in each respective industry. Significant acquisitions included Taylor Company, acquired for a purchase price of $1.0 billion, net of cash acquired, and Cooking Solutions Group Inc., acquired for a purchase price of $106.1 million, net of cash acquired. All other acquisitions were acquired for an aggregate purchase price totaling $359.1 million, net of cash acquired.
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
January 2015:March 2018: The company acquiredcompleted its acquisition of certain assets of JoeTap, a leading innovator of on-demand nitro and cold brew coffee dispensing equipment for the commercial foodservice industry.
April 2018: The company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Desmon Food Service Equipment CompanyFirex S.r.l. ("Desmon"Firex"), a leading manufacturer of blast chillers and refrigeration for the commercial foodservice industry, located in Nusco, Italy, for a purchase price of approximately $13.5 million.
January 2015: The company acquired substantially all of the assets of J. Goldstein & Co. Pty. Ltd. ("Goldstein") and Eswood Australia Pty. Ltd. ("Eswood" and together with Goldstein, "Goldstein Eswood"). Goldstein is a leading manufacturer of cooking equipment including ranges, ovens, griddles, fryers and warning equipment and Eswood is a leading manufacturer of dishwashing equipment, both for the commercial foodservice in industry, located in Smithfield, Australia, for a purchase price of approximately $27.4 million.
February 2015: The company acquired certain assets of Marsal & Sons, Inc ("Marsal"), a leading manufacturer of deck ovens for the commercial foodservice industry, for a purchase price of approximately $5.5 million.
May 2015: The company acquired certain assets of the Induc Commercial Electronics Co. Ltd. ("Induc"), a leading manufacturer of inductionsteam cooking equipment for the commercial foodservice industry located in Qingdao, China,Sedico, Italy.
May 2018: The company completed its acquisition of all of the issued share capital of Josper S.A. ("Josper"), a leading manufacturer of charcoal grill and oven cooking equipment for commercial foodservice and residential industries located in Pineda de Mar, Spain.
June 2018: The company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of the Taylor Company ("Taylor"), a purchase price of approximately $10.6 million.world leader in beverage solutions, soft serve and ice cream dispensing equipment, frozen drink machines, and automated double-sided grills, for the commercial foodservice industry, located in Rockton, Illinois.
May 2016:
December 2018: The company acquiredcompleted its acquisition of all of the capital stock of the Crown Food Service Equipment, Ltd. ("Crown"), a leading design and manufacturer of steam cooking equipment for the commercial foodservice industry located in Toronto, Canada.
December 2018: The company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of EVO America, Inc. ("EVO"), a leading design and manufacturer of ventless cooking equipment for the commercial foodservice industry, located near Portland, Oregon.
April 2019: The company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Cooking Solutions Group, Inc. ("Cooking Solutions Group") from Standex International Corporation, which consists of the brands APW Wyott, Bakers Pride, BKI and Ultrafryer and locations in Texas, South Carolina and Mexico.
April 2019: The company completed the acquisition of all of the capital stock of Powerhouse Dynamics, Inc. ("Powerhouse"), a leader in cloud-based IoT solutions for the commercial foodservice industry located near Boston.
April 2019: The company completed the acquisition of all of the assets related to the Starline Product line ("Starline") non-carbonated beverage dispensers for the commercial foodservice industry.
June 2019: The company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Follett Corporation ("Follett"),Ss Brewtech, a leading manufacturer of ice machines, icemarket leader in professional craft brewing and water dispensingbeverage equipment ice storage and transport products and medical grade refrigeration products for the foodservice and healthcare industries, for a purchase price of approximately $207.7 million.based in Santa Ana, California.
Food Processing Equipment Group
April 2015:November 2019: The company acquired certain assetscompleted the acquisition of the High Speed Slicing business unit of Marel ("Thurne"), a leading manufacturer of slicing equipment for the food processing industry, located in Norwich, United Kingdom, for a purchase price of approximately $12.6 million.
May 2016: The company acquired certain assets of Emico Automated Bakery Equipment Solutions ("Emico"), a manufacturer of high speed dough make-up bakery equipment for the food processing industry, for a purchase price of approximately $1.0 million.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
September 2015: The company acquired all of the capital stock of AGA Rangemaster Group plcSynesso, Inc. ("AGA"Synesso"), a leadingdesigner and manufacturer of residential kitchen equipment including cookers, ranges, ovens and refrigerationsemi-automatic espresso machines for the commercial foodservice industry, located in Leamington Spa, the United Kingdom, for a purchase price of approximately $201.0 million.Seattle, Washington.
Food Processing Equipment Group
December 2015:
February 2018: The company acquiredcompleted its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Lynx Grills, Inc.Hinds-Bock Corporation ("Lynx"Hinds-Bock"), a leading manufacturer of premiumsolutions for filling and depositing bakery and food product located in Bothell, Washington.
April 2018: The company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Ve.Ma.C S.r.l. ("Ve.Ma.C"), a leading designer and manufacturer of handling, automation and robotics solutions for protein food processing lines located in Castelnuovo Rangone, Italy.
October 2018: The company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of the M-TEK Corporation ("M-TEK"), a leading manufacturer of Modified Atmospheric Packaging (MAP) systems located in Elgin, Illinois.
July 2019: The company completed the acquisition of all of the capital stock of Packaging Progressions, Inc. ("Pacproinc"), a market leader in automated packaging technologies for customers in the protein and baker segments based in Souderton, Pennsylvania.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
November 2019: The company completed its acquisition of Brava Home, Inc. ("Brava"), a company known for its advanced residential outdoor equipment for a purchase price of approximately $83.8 million.light cooking technology located in Redwood City, California.
The Customers and Market
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Industry
The company's end-user customers include: (i) fast food, fast casual and quick-service restaurants, (ii) full-service restaurants, including casual-theme restaurants, (iii) retail outlets, such as convenience stores, supermarkets and department stores and (iv) public and private institutions, such as hotels, resorts, schools, hospitals, long-term care facilities, correctional facilities, stadiums, airports, corporate cafeterias, military facilities and government agencies. The company's domestic sales are primarily through independent dealers and distributors and are marketed by the company's sales personnel and network of independent manufacturers' representatives. Many of the dealers in the U.S. belong to buying groups that negotiate sales terms with the company. Certain large multi-national restaurant and hotel chain customers have purchasing organizations that manage product procurement for their systems. Included in these customers are several large multi-national restaurant chains, which account for a meaningful portion of the company's business, although no single customer accounts for more than 10% of net sales.
Over the past several decades, the commercial foodservice equipment industry has enjoyed steady growth in the United States due to the development of new quick-service and casual-theme restaurant chain concepts, the expansion of foodservice into nontraditional locations such as convenience stores and store equipment modernization driven by efforts to improve efficiencies within foodservice operations. In the international markets, foodservice equipment manufacturers have been experiencing stronger growth than the U.S. market due to expanding international economies and increased opportunity for expansion by U.S. chains into developing regions.
The company believes that the worldwide commercial foodservice equipment market has sales in excess of $20.0 billion. The cooking, warming, refrigeration, freezing and warmingbeverage dispensing equipment segment of this market is estimated by management to exceed $1.5$3.0 billion in North America and $3.0$5.0 billion worldwide. The company believes that continuing growth in demand for foodservice equipment will result from the development of new restaurant concepts in the U.S. and the expansion of U.S. and foreign chains into international markets, the replacement and upgrade of existing equipment and new equipment requirements resulting from menu changes.
Food Processing Equipment Industry
The company's customers include a diversified base of leading food processors. Customers include several large international food processing companies, which account for a significant portion of the revenues of this business segment, although none of which is greater than 10% of net sales. A large portion of the company's revenues have been generated from producers of pre-cooked meat products such as hot dogs, dinner sausages, poultry, and lunchmeats and producers of baked goods such as muffins, cookies and bread; however, the company believes that it can leverage its expertise and product development capabilities in thermal processing to organically grow into new end markets.
Food processing has quickly become a highly competitive landscape dominated by a few large conglomerates that possess a variety of food brands. The consolidation of food processing plants associated with industry consolidation drives a need for more flexible and efficient equipment that is capable of processing large volumes in quicker cycle times. In recent years, food processors have had to conform to the demands of “big-box” retailers and the restaurant industry, including, most importantly, greater product consistency and exact package weights. Food processors are beginning to realize that their old equipment is no longer capable of efficiently producing adequate uniformity in the large product volumes required, and they are turning to equipment manufacturers that offer product consistency, innovative packaging designs and other solutions. To protect their own brands and reputations, retailers and large restaurant chains are also dictating food safety standards that are often more strict than government regulations.
A number of factors, including raw material prices, labor and health care costs, are driving food processors to focus on ways to improve their generally thin profitability margins. In order to increase the profitability and efficiency in processing plants, food processors pay increasingly more attention to the performance of their machinery and the flexibility in the functionality of the equipment. Food processors are continuously looking for ways to make their plants safer and reduce labor-intensive activities. Food processors have begun to recognize the value of new technology as an important vehicle to drive productivity and profitability in their plants. Due to customer requirements, food processors are expected to continue to demand new and innovative equipment that addresses food safety, food quality, automation and flexibility.
Improving living standards in developing countries is spurring increased worldwide demand for pre-cooked and convenience food products. As industrializing countries create more jobs, consumers in these countries will have the means to buy pre-cooked food products. In industrialized regions, such as Western Europe and the U.S., consumers are demanding more pre-cookedpre-
cooked and convenience food products, such as deli tray variety packs, frozen food products and ready-to-eat varieties of ethnic foods.
The global food processing equipment industry is highly fragmented, large and growing. The company estimates demand for food processing equipment is approximately $5.0 billion in North America and $40.0 billion worldwide. The company’s product offerings compete in a subsegment of the total industry, and the relevant market size for its products is estimated by management to exceed $2.0$3.0 billion in North America and $4.0$5.0 billion worldwide.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Industry
The company’s end-userend-users include customers include thewith high-end residential kitchens. The premium segment of the residential kitchen equipment industry is estimated to be in excess of $1.0 billion annually in North America. This segment has grown over the past several decades after the original introduction premium cooking range. Viking was the first manufacturer to introduce the premium cooking equipment to the North American market, providing equipment that was comparable to commercial grade rangesAmerica and ovens for home chefs and culinarians.$3.0 billion worldwide. The market potential for such equipment has continued to broaden due to an increase in interest from the consumer to have high-end, luxuryprofessional style higher performing appliances in their home. The kitchen has been an area in which consumers have invested over the past several decades to increase the personal satisfaction and the value of their home. Other important factors which affect the market size and growth include the level of new home starts, home remodels and general macro-economic factors. Macro-economic factors such as GDP growth, employment rates, inflation and consumer confidence, which impact the overall economy, impact the residential kitchen equipment industry and cause greater variability in the revenues at this segment than the other business segments the company operates in.segment.
Backlog
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
The backlog of orders for the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group was $77.7$128.7 million at December 31, 2016,28, 2019, most all of which is expected to be filled during 2017.2020. The acquired Follett businessEVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech and Synesso businesses accounted for $12.9$16.3 million of the backlog. The Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group's backlog was $68.6 million at January 2, 2016. The backlog is not necessarily indicative of the level of business expected for the year, as there is generally a short time between order receipt and shipment for the majority of this segment's products.
Food Processing Equipment Group
The backlog of orders for the Food Processing Equipment Group was $115.9 million at December 31, 2016, all of which is expected to be filled during 2017. The Food Processing Equipment Group's backlog was $108.5 million at January 2, 2016.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
The backlog of orders for the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group was $44.2$134.5 million at December 31, 2016, all of which is expected to be filled during 2017. The Residential Kitchen Equipment Group's backlog was $56.8 million at January 2, 2016.29, 2018. The backlog is not necessarily indicative of the level of business expected for the year, as there is generally a short time between order receipt and shipment for the majority of this segment's products.
Food Processing Equipment Group
The backlog of orders for the Food Processing Equipment Group was $137.8 million at December 28, 2019, all of which is expected to be filled during 2020. The acquired Pacproinc business accounted for $5.2 million of the backlog. The Food Processing Equipment Group's backlog was $103.5 million at December 29, 2018.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
The backlog of orders for the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group was $41.0 million at December 28, 2019, all of which is expected to be filled during 2020. The acquired Brava business accounted for less than $0.1 million of the backlog. The Residential Kitchen Equipment Group's backlog was $47.8 million at December 29, 2018. The backlog is not necessarily indicative of the level of business expected for the year, as there is generally a short time between order receipt and shipment for the majority of this segment's products.
Marketing and Distribution
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
Middleby's products and services are marketed in the U.S. and in over 100 countries through a combination of the company's sales and marketing personnel, together with an extensive network of independent dealers, distributors, consultants, sales representatives and agents.
In the United States, the company distributes its products to independent end-users primarily through a network of non-exclusive dealers nationwide, who are supported by manufacturers' marketing representatives. Sales are made direct to certain large restaurant chains that have established their own procurement and distribution organization for their franchise system. The company's relationships with major restaurant chains are primarily handled through an integrated effort of top-level executive and sales management at the corporate and business division levels to best serve each customer's needs. International sales are primarily made through a network of company owned and local independent distributors and dealers.
Food Processing Equipment Group
The company maintains a direct sales force to market the brands and maintain direct relationships with each of its customers. In North America, the company employs regional sales managers, each with responsibility for a group of customers and a particular region. This sales force is complimented with involvement of executive management to maintain relationships with customer executives and facilitate coordination amongst the brands for the key global accounts. Internationally, the company maintains sales and distribution offices in Brazil, China, Denmark, Dubai, France, Mexico and Russia along with global sales managers supported by a network of independent sales representatives.
The company’s sale process is highly consultative due to the highly technical nature of the equipment. During a typical sales process, a salesperson makes several visits to the customer’s facility to conceptually discuss the production requirements, footprint and configuration of the proposed equipment. The company employs a technically proficient sales force, many of whom have previous technical experience with the company as well as education backgrounds in food science.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
The company’s products are marketed through a network of distributors, dealers, designers, and home builders to the residential customers. The company markets and sells its products to these channels through a company-employed sales force. The company’s products are distributed through a combination of an independent network of distributors and its wholly owned distribution operations. The company's wholly owned distribution operations were established in connection with the Viking and related Viking Distributors' acquisitions and include two primary customer support centers and regional warehouse and logistic operations, which stock products and service parts for the respective region.
Marketing support is provided to and coordinated with its network of dealers, designers, and home builders sales partners to allow for coordinated efforts to market jointly to the end-user customers. The company in certain cases offers incentive based financial programs to invest in local marketing activities with these sales partners.
Services and Product Warranty
The company is an industry leader in equipment installation programs and after-sales support and service. The company provides a warranty on its products typically for a one year period and in certain instances greater periods. The emphasis on global service increases the likelihood of repeat business and enhances Middleby's image as a partner and provider of quality products and services.
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
The company's domestic service network consists of over 100 authorized service parts distributors and 3,000 independent certified technicians who have been formally trained and certified by the company through its factory training school and on-site installation training programs. Technicians work through service parts distributors, which are required to provide around-the-clock service. The company provides real-time technical support to the technicians in the field through factory-based technical service engineers. The company maintains sufficient service parts inventory to ensure short lead times for service calls.
It is critical to major foodservice chains that equipment providers be capable of supporting equipment on a worldwide basis. The company's international service network covers over 100 countries with thousands of service technicians trained in the installation and service of the company's products and supported by internationally-based service managers along with the factory-based technical service engineers.
Food Processing Equipment Group
The company maintains a technical service group of employees that oversees and performs installation and startup of equipment and completes warranty and repair work. This technical service group provides services for customers both domestically and internationally. Service technicians are trained regularly on new equipment to ensure the customer receives a high level of customer service. From time to time the company utilizes trained third party technicians supervised by company employees to supplement company employees on large projects.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
The company maintains a network of independent authorized service agents throughout North America. Authorized service agents are supported and trained by regional factory-support centers of the company. Trained technical support personnel are available to support independent service agents with technical information and assist in repair issues. The factory-support centers also dispatch service technicians to the customer and provide follow-up and monitoring to ensure field issues are resolved. The company's independent service agents maintain a stock of factory-supplied parts to allow for a high first-call completion rate for service and warranty repairs. The company maintains a substantial amount of service parts at each of its manufacturing operations and at regional service parts depotsdistribution operations to provide for quick ship of parts to service agents and end-user customers when necessary.
Internationally, the company has a network of company owned and independent distributors that provide sales and technical service support in their respective markets. These distributors are required to have a team of factory-trained service technicians and maintain a required stock of service parts to support the equipment in the market. The factory supports the international distributors with technical trainers which travel to the various markets to provide on-hands training and monitoring of the distributor service operations.
Competition
The commercial foodservice, food processing and residential kitchen equipment industries are highly competitive and fragmented. Within a given product line the company may compete with a variety of companies, including companies that manufacture a broad line of products and those that specialize in a particular product category. Competition is based upon many factors, including brand recognition, product features, reliability, quality, price, delivery lead times, serviceability and after-sale service. The company believes that its ability to compete depends on strong brand equity, exceptional product performance, short lead-times and timely delivery, competitive pricing and superior customer service support. In the international markets, the company competes with U.S. manufacturers and numerous global and local competitors.
The company believes that it is one of the largest multiple-line manufacturers of commercial kitchen, food processing and residential kitchen equipment in the U.S. and worldwide although some of its competitors are units of operations that are larger than the company and possess greater financial and personnel resources. Among the company's major competitors to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group are: Manitowoc Company,Welbilt, Inc.; Vulcan-Hart and Hobart Corporation, subsidiaries of Illinois Tool Works Inc.; Electrolux; Groen, a subsidiary of Dover Corporation; Rational AG; and the Ali Group. Major competitors to the Food Processing Equipment Group include AMF Bakery Systems, The GEA Group, JBT Technologies, Marel, and Provisur. The residential kitchen appliance sector is highly competitive and includes a number of large global competitors including, Whirlpool Corporation, Electrolux, GE Appliances, LG Corporation, Panasonic Corporation and Samsung Group. However, within the premium segment of this kitchen equipment market, there are fewer competitors and the company’s competition includes Wolf and Subzero,Sub-Zero, subsidiaries of Sub-Zero Group, Inc.; Thermador, Bosch and Gaggenau, subsidiaries of Bosch Siemens; Dacor, subsidiary of Samsung Electronics America; and Miele.
Manufacturing and Quality Control
The company’s manufacturing operations provide for an expertise in the design and production of specific products for each of the three business segments. The company has from time to time either consolidated manufacturing facilities producing similar product or transferred production of certain products to another existing operation with a higher level of expertise or efficiency.
The Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group manufactures its products in fifteentwenty domestic and tenseventeen international production facilities. These production facilities are located in Fort Smith, Arkansas; Brea, California; Vacaville, California; Windsor, California; Elgin, Illinois; Mundelein, Illinois; Rockton, Illinois; Menominee, Michigan; Bow, New Hampshire; Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina; Dayton, Ohio; Tualatin, Oregon; Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; Easton, Pennsylvania; Smithville, Tennessee; Carrollton, Texas; Burlington, Vermont; Essex Junction, Vermont;Vermont (two separate facilities); Redmond, Washington; Seattle, Washington; New South Wales, Australia; Shanghai,Toronto, Canada; Humen, China, Qingdao City, China; Brøndby, Denmark; Randers, Denmark; Viljandi, Estonia; Nusco, Italy; Scandicci, Italy; Sedico, Italy; Nogales, Mexico; Laguna, the Philippines; Wislina, Poland; Pineda de Mar, Spain; Fristad, Sweden; Lincoln, the United Kingdom; Warwickshire, the United Kingdom and Wrexham, the United Kingdom.
The Food Processing Equipment Group manufactures its products in seveneleven domestic and foursix international production facilities. These production facilities are located in Gainesville, Georgia; Chicago,Elgin, Illinois; Elk Grove, Illinois; Algona, Iowa; Clayton, North Carolina; Maysville, Oklahoma; Souderton, Pennsylvania; Plano, Texas; Waynesboro, Virginia; Bothell, Washington; Lodi, Wisconsin; Aalborg, Denmark; Mauron, France; Reichenau, Germany; Bangalore, IndiaIndia; Castelnuovo Rangone, Italy and Norwich, the United Kingdom.
The Residential Kitchen Equipment Group manufactures its products in six domestic and ninefive international production facilities. These production facilities are located in Downey, California; Greenville, Michigan; Greenwood, Mississippi;Mississippi (four separate facilities); Brown Deer, Wisconsin; Rosyl St. Pierre, France; Saint Ouen L'aumone, France; Saint Symhorien, France; Waterford, Ireland; Gee Targu Mures, Romania; Coalbrookdale, the United Kingdom; Ketley, the United Kingdom; Leamington Spa, the United Kingdom and Nottingham, the United Kingdom.
Metal fabrication, finishing, sub-assembly and assembly operations are conducted at each manufacturing facility. Equipment installed at individual manufacturing facilities includes numerically controlled turret presses and machine centers, shears, press brakes, welding equipment, polishing equipment, CAD/CAM systems and product testing and quality assurance measurement devices. The company's CAD/CAM systems enable virtual electronic prototypes to be created, reviewed and refined before the first physical prototype is built.
Detailed manufacturing drawings are quickly and accurately derived from the model and passed electronically to manufacturing for programming and optimal parts nesting on various numerically controlled punching cells. The company believes that this integrated product development and manufacturing process is critical to assuring product performance, customer service and competitive pricing.
The company has established comprehensive programs to ensure the quality of products, to analyze potential product failures and to certify vendors for continuous improvement. Products manufactured by the company are tested prior to shipment to ensure compliance with company standards.
Sources of Supply
The company purchases its raw materials and component parts from a number of suppliers. The majority of the company’s material purchases are standard commodity-type materials, such as stainless steel, electrical components and hardware. These materials and parts generally are available in adequate quantities from numerous suppliers. Some component parts are obtained from sole sources of supply. In such instances, management believes it can substitute other suppliers as required. The majority of fabrication is done internally through the use of automated equipment. Certain equipment and accessories are manufactured by other suppliers for sale by the company. The company believes it enjoys good relationships with its suppliers and considers the present sources of supply to be adequate for its present and anticipated future requirements.
Research and Development
The company believes its future success will depend in part on its ability to develop new products and to improve existing products. Much of the company's research and development efforts at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, the Food Processing Equipment Group and the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group are directed to the development and improvement of products designed to reduce cooking and processing time, increase capacity or throughput, reduce energy consumption, minimize labor costs, improve product yield and improve safety, while maintaining consistency and quality of cooking production and food preparation. The company has identified these issues as key concerns for most of its customers. The company often identifies product improvement opportunities by working closely with customers on specific applications. Most research and development activities are performed by the company's technical service and engineering staff located at each manufacturing location. On occasion, the company will contract outside engineering firms to assist with the development of certain technical concepts and applications. See Note 3(o)3(n) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the company's research and development activities.
Trademarks, Patents and Licenses
The company has developed, acquired and assembled a leading portfolio of trademarks and trade names. The company believes that these trademarks and trade names provide for a significant competitive advantage due to a long-standing recognition in the marketplace with customers, restaurant operators, distribution partners, sales and service agents, and foodservice consultants that specify foodservice equipment. The company has historically maintained a high level of market share of products sold with these trademarks and trade names.
The company's leading portfolio of trade names of its Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group include Anets®, Beech®, Blodgett®,Anets, APW Wyott, Bakers Pride, Beech, BKI, Blodgett, Combi®, Blodgett Range®, Bloomfield®, Britannia®, CTX®, Carter-Hoffmann®, Celfrost®, Concordia®, CookTek®, Desmon®, Doyon®, Eswood®, Follett®, FriFri®, Giga®, Goldstein®, Holman®, Houno®, IMC®, Induc®, Jade®, Lang®, Lincat®, MagiKitch'n®,Combi, Blodgett Range, Bloomfield, Britannia, Carter-Hoffmann, Celfrost, Concordia, CookTek, Crown, CTX, Desmon, Doyon, Eswood, EVO, Firex, Follett, Frifri, Giga, Globe, Goldstein, Holman, Houno, IMC, Induc, Jade, JoeTap, Josper, L2F, Lang, Lincat, MagiKitch’n, Market Forge®, Marsal®,Forge, Marsal, Middleby Marshall®, MPC®, Nieco®, Nu-Vu®, PerfectFry®,Marshall, MPC, Nieco, Nu-Vu, PerfectFry, Pitco, Frialator®, Southbend®, Star®, Toastmaster®, Turbochef®, Wells®Powerhouse Dynamics, QualServ, Southbend, Ss Brewtech, Star, Starline, Sveba Dahlen, Synesso, Taylor, Toastmaster, TurboChef, Ultrafryer, Varimixer, Wells and Wunder-Bar®.Wunder-Bar.
The company’s leading portfolio of trade names of its Food Processing Equipment Group include Alkar®,Alkar, Armor Inox®, Auto-Bake®,Inox, Auto-Bake, Baker Thermal Solutions®, Cozzini®, Danfotech®, Drake®, Maurer-Atmos®,Solutions, Burford, Cozzini, CVP Systems, Danfotech, Drake, Emico, Glimek, Hinds-Bock, Maurer-Atmos, MP Equipment®, RapidPak®,Equipment, M-TEK, Pacproinc, RapidPak, Scanico, Spooner Vicars®,Vicars, Stewart Systems®Systems, Thurne and Thurne®.Ve.Ma.C.
The company’s leading portfolio of trade names of its Residential Kitchen Equipment Group include AGA®, AGA, Cookshop®, Brigade®, Falcon®,AGA Cookshop, Brava, EVO, Fired Earth®, Grange®, Heartland®,Earth, Heartland, La Cornue®,Cornue, Leisure Sinks®, Lynx®, Marvel®, Mercury®, Rangemaster®, Rayburn®, RedFyre®, Sedona®, Stanley®, ®TurboChef®, U-Line®Sinks, Lynx, Marvel, Mercury, Rangemaster, Rayburn, Redfyre, Sedona, Stanley, TurboChef, U-Line and Viking®.Viking.
The company holds a broad portfolio of patents and licenses covering technology and applications related to various products, equipment and systems. Management believes the expiration of any one of these patents would not have a material adverse effect on the overall operations or profitability of the company.
Employees
As of December 28, 2019, 9,778 persons were employed by the company and its subsidiaries among the various groups as described below.
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
As of December 31, 2016, 3,88628, 2019, 5,999 persons were employed within the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Of this amount, 1,5772,436 were management, administrative, sales, engineering and supervisory personnel; 1,8153,084 were hourly production non-union workers; and 494479 were hourly production union members. Included in these totals were 1,4862,179 individuals employed outside of the United States, of which 7731,170 were management, sales, administrative and engineering personnel, 638841 were hourly production non-union workers and 75168 were hourly production union workers, who participate in an employee cooperative. At its Windsor, California facility, the company has a union contract with the Sheet Metal Workers International Association that expires on December 31, 2020. At its Elgin, Illinois facility, the company has a union contract with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters that expires on July 31, 2017.2022. At its Easton, Pennsylvania facility, the company has a union contract with the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union that expires on May 4, 2019.2023. The company also has a union workforce at its manufacturing facility in the Philippines, under a contract that expires on June 30, 2021. Management believes that the relationships between employees, unions and management are good.
Food Processing Equipment Group
As of December 31, 2016, 1,12928, 2019, 1,532 persons were employed within the Food Processing Equipment Group. Of this amount, 524776 were management, administrative, sales, engineering and supervisory personnel; 465636 were hourly production non-union workers; and 140120 were hourly production union members. Included in these totals were 410633 individuals employed outside of the United States, of which 225368 were management, sales, administrative and engineering personnel and 185265 were hourly production non-union workers. At its Lodi, Wisconsin facility, the company has a contract with the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers that expires on December 31, 2018.2021. At its Algona, Iowa facility, the company has a union contract with the United Food and Commercial Workers that expires on December 31, 2018.30, 2022. Management believes that the relationships between employees, unions and management are good.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group
As of December 31, 2016, 2,98128, 2019, 2,205 persons were employed within the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. Of this amount, 1,4431,090 were management, administrative, sales, engineering and supervisory personnel and 1,5381,115 were hourly production workers. Included in these totals were 1,8821,160 individuals employed outside of the United States, of which 1,025665 were management, sales, administrative and engineering personnel and 857495 were hourly non-union production workers. Management believes that the relationships between employees and management are good.
Corporate
As of December 31, 2016, 3028, 2019, 42 persons were employed at the corporate office.
Seasonality
The company’s revenues at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group historically have been slightly stronger in the second and third quarters due to increased purchases from customers involved with the catering business and institutional customers, particularly schools, during the summer months. Revenues at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group are historically stronger in the second and third quarters, due to increased purchases of outdoor cooking equipment and greater new home construction and remodels during the summer months.months, and the fourth quarter, due to increased holiday purchases in the European markets.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The company’s business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition are subject to various risks, including, but not limited to those set forth below. If any of the following risks actually occurs, the company’s business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. These risk factors should be carefully considered together with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “SpecialSpecial Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements"Statements.
Economic conditions may cause a decline in business and consumer spending which could adversely affect the company’s business and financial performance.
The company’s operating results are impacted by the health of the North American, European, Asian and Latin American economies. The company’s business and financial performance, including collection of its accounts receivable, may be adversely affected by the current and future economic conditions that caused, and may cause in the future, a decline in business and consumer spending, a reduction in the availability of credit and decreased growth by its existing customers, resulting in customers electing to delay the replacement of aging equipment. Higher energy costs, rising interest rates, weakness in the residential construction, housing and home improvement markets, financial market volatility, recession and acts of terrorism may also adversely affect the company’s business and financial performance. Additionally, the company may experience difficulties in scaling its operations due to economic pressures in the U.S. and International markets.
Uncertainty surrounding the terms of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets or the Company’s business.
In June 2016, a majority of voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union in a national referendum. On January 31, 2020, the U.K. officially exited the European Union and entered into a transition period to negotiate the final terms of Brexit. The transition period is expected to end on December 31, 2020. Many potential future impacts of Brexit remain unclear and could adversely impact certain areas of labor and trade in addition to creating further short-term uncertainty and currency volatility. In the absence of a future trade deal, the U.K.’s trade with the European Union and the rest of the world would be subject to tariffs and duties set by the World Trade Organization. Additionally, the movement of goods between the U.K. and the remaining member states of the European Union will be subject to additional inspections and documentation checks, leading to possible delays at ports of entry and departure. These changes to the trading relationship between the U.K. and European Union would likely result in increased cost of goods imported into and exported from the U.K. and may decrease the profitability of the company's U.K. and other operations. Additional currency volatility could drive a weaker British pound, which increases the cost of goods imported into the U.K. operations and may decrease the profitability of the U.K. operations. A weaker British pound versus the U.S. dollar also causes local currency results of U.K. operations to be translated into fewer U.S. dollars during a reporting period. With a range of outcomes still possible, the impact from Brexit remains uncertain and will depend, in part, on the final outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory and other negotiations.
The company’s level of indebtedness could adversely affect its business, results of operations and growth strategy.
The company now has and may continue to have a significant amount of indebtedness. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had $732.1$1,873.1 million of borrowings and $10.2$13.3 million in letters of credit outstanding. To the extent the company requires additional capital resources, there can be no assurance that such funds will be available on favorable terms, or at all. The unavailability of funds could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations and ability to expand the company’s operations.
The company’s level of indebtedness could adversely affect it in a number of ways, including the following:
the company may be unable to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
a significant portion of the company’s cash flow from operations must be dedicated to debt service, which reduces the amount of cash the company has available for other purposes;
the company may be more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in the company’s business or general economic and industry conditions;
the company may be disadvantaged competitively by its potential inability to adjust to changing market conditions, as a result of its significant level of indebtedness; and
the company may be restricted in its ability to make strategic acquisitions and to pursue new business opportunities.
The company’s current credit agreement limits its ability to conduct business, which could negatively affect the company’s ability to finance future capital needs and engage in other business activities.
The covenants in the company’s existing credit agreement contain a number of significant limitations on its ability to, among other things:
pay dividends;
incur additional indebtedness;
create liens on the company’s assets;
engage in new lines of business;
make investments;
make capital expenditures and enter into leases; and
acquire or dispose of assets.
These restrictive covenants, among others, could negatively affect the company’s ability to finance its future capital needs, engage in other business activities or withstand a future downturn in the company’s business or the economy.
Under the company’s current credit agreement, the company is required to maintain certain specified financial ratios and meet financial tests, including certain ratios of leverage and fixed chargeinterest coverage. The company’s ability to comply with these requirements may be affected by matters beyond its control, and, as a result, there can be no assurance that the company will be able to meet these ratios and tests. A breach of any of these covenants would prevent the company from being able to draw under the company's revolver and would result in a default under the company’s current credit agreement. In the event of a default under the company’s current credit agreement, the lenders could terminate their commitments and declare all amounts borrowed, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable. Borrowings under other debt instruments that contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions may also be accelerated and become due and payable at such time. The company may be unable to pay these debts in these circumstances.
Fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Our profitability may be adversely affected during any periods of unexpected or rapid increases in interest rates. We maintain a
revolving credit facility, which, at December 28, 2019, bore interest at either 1.625% above LIBOR per annum or 0.625% above the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and one month LIBOR plus 1.00%. A significant increase in any of the forgoing rates would significantly increase our cost of borrowings, reduce the availability and increase the cost of
obtaining new debt and refinancing existing indebtedness and/or negatively impact the market price of our common stock. For
additional detail related to this risk, see Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk."
The company has a significant amount of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles could suffer losses due to asset impairment charges.
The company’s balance sheet includes a significant amount of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles, which representsrepresent approximately 37% and 20%, respectively, of its total assets as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed in conjunction with acquisitions is recorded as goodwill. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 “Intangibles-GoodwillIntangibles-Goodwill and Other”Other, the company’s long-lived assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, the company considers changes in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Various uncertainties, including continued adverse conditions in the capital markets or changes in general economic conditions, could impact the future operating performance at one or more of the company’s businesses, which could significantly affect the company’s valuations and could result in additional future impairments. Also, estimates of future cash flows are judgments based on the company’s experience and knowledge of operations. These estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors, including changes in global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation, competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company’s estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company may be required to record impairment charges. Any such charge could have a material adverse effect on the company’s reported net earnings.
The company's defined benefit pension plans are subject to financial market risks that could adversely affect the company's financial statements.
The performance of the financial markets and interest rates impact our defined benefit pension plan expenses and funding obligations. Significant changes in market interest rates, decreases in fair value of plan assets, investment losses on plan assets and changes in discount rates may increase the company's funding obligations and adversely impact our financial statements. In addition, upward pressure on the cost of providing healthcare coverage to current employees and retirees may increase our future funding obligations and adversely affect our financial statements.
Competition in the commercial foodservice, food processing, and residential kitchen equipment industries is intense and could impact the company’s results of operations and cash flows.
The company operates in highly competitive industries. In each of the company’s three business segments, competition is based on a variety of factors including product features and design, brand recognition, reliability, durability, technology, energy efficiency, breadth of product offerings, price, customer relationships, delivery lead-times, serviceability and after-sale service. The company has numerous competitors in each business segment. Many of the company’s competitors are substantially larger and enjoy substantially greater financial, marketing, technological and personnel resources. These factors may enable them to develop similar or superior products, to provide lower cost products and to carry out their business strategies more quickly and efficiently than the company can. In addition, some competitors focus on particular product lines or geographic regions or emphasize their local manufacturing presence or local market knowledge. Some competitors have different pricing structures and may be able to deliver their products at lower prices. Although the company believes that the performance and price characteristics of its products will provide competitive solutions for its customers’ needs, there can be no assurance that the company’s customers will continue to choose the company’s products over products offered by its competitors.
Further, the markets for the company’s products are characterized by changing technology and evolving industry standards. The company’s ability to compete in the past has depended in part on the company’s ability to develop innovative new products and bring them to market more quickly than the company’s competitors. The company’s ability to compete successfully will depend, in large part, on its ability to enhance and improve its existing products, to continue to bring innovative products to market in a timely fashion, to adapt the company’s products to the needs and standards of its current and potential customers and to continue to improve operating efficiencies and lower manufacturing costs. Moreover, competitors may develop technologies or products that render the company’s products obsolete or less marketable. If the company’s products, markets and services are not competitive, the company’s business, financial condition and operating results will be materially harmed.
The company is subject to risks associated with developing products and technologies, which could delay product introductions and result in significant expenditures.
The product, program and service needs of the company’s customers change and evolve regularly, and the company invests substantial amounts in research and development efforts to pursue advancements in a wide range of technologies, products and services. Also, the company continually seeks to refine and improve upon the performance, utility and physical attributes of its existing products and to develop new products. As a result, the company’s business is subject to risks associated with new product and technological development, including unanticipated technical or other problems, meeting development, production, certification and regulatory approval schedules, execution of internal and external performance plans, availability of supplier- and internally-produced parts and materials, performance of suppliers and subcontractors, hiring and training of qualified personnel, achieving cost and production efficiencies, identification of emerging technological trends in the company’s target end-markets, validation of innovative technologies, the level of customer interest in new technologies and products, and customer acceptance of the company’s products and products that incorporate technologies that the company develops. These factors involve significant risks and uncertainties. Also, any development efforts divert resources from other potential investments in the company’s businesses, and these efforts may not lead to the development of new technologies or products on a timely basis or meet the needs of the company’s customers as fully as competitive offerings. In addition, the markets for the company’s products or products that incorporate the company’s technologies may not develop or grow as the company anticipates. The company or its suppliers and subcontractors may encounter difficulties in developing and producing these new products and services, and may not realize the degree or timing of benefits initially anticipated. Due to the design complexity of the company's products, the company may in the future experience delays in completing the development and introduction of new products. Any delays could result in increased development costs or deflect resources from other projects. The occurrence of any of these risks could cause a substantial change in the design, delay in the development, or abandonment of new technologies and products. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the company will develop new technologies superior to the company’s current technologies or successfully bring new products to market.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that new technologies or products, if developed, will meet the company’s current price or performance objectives, be developed on a timely basis, or prove to be as effective as products based on other technologies. The inability to successfully complete the development of a product, or a determination by the company, for financial, technical or other reasons, not to complete development of a product, particularly in instances in which the company has made significant expenditures, could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition and operating results.
The company has depended, and will continue to depend, on key customers for a material portion of its revenues. As a result, changes in the purchasing patterns of such key customers could adversely impact the company’s operating results.
Many of the company’s key customers are large restaurant chains and major food processing companies. The demand for the company’s equipment can vary from quarter to quarter depending on the company’s customers’ internal growth plans, construction, seasonality and other factors. In addition, during an economic downturn, key customers could both open fewer facilities and defer purchases of new equipment for existing operations. Either of these conditions could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Price changes in some materials and disruptions in supply could affect the company’s profitability.
The company uses large amounts of stainless steel, aluminized steel and other commodities in the manufacture of its products. A significant increase in the price of steel or any other commodity that the company is not able to pass on to its customers would adversely affect the company’s operating results. In addition, an unanticipated delay in delivery of raw materials and component inventories by suppliers—including a delay due to capacity constraints, labor disputes, the financial condition of suppliers, weather emergencies, or other natural disasters—may impair the ability of the company to satisfy customer demand. An interruption in or the cessation of an important supply by any third party and the company’s inability to make alternative arrangements in a timely manner, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on the company’s business, financial condition and operating results.
The company’s acquisition, investment and alliance strategy involves risks. If the company is unable to effectively manage these risks, its business will be materially harmed.
To achieve the company’s strategic objectives, the company has pursued and may continue to pursue strategic acquisitions and investments or invest in other companies, businesses or technologies. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including the following:
• difficulties in the assimilation of acquired businesses or technologies;
inability to operate acquired businesses or utilize acquired technologies profitably;
diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
potential assumption of unknown material liabilities;
failure to achieve financial or operating objectives;
| |
| • | unanticipated costs relating to acquisitions or to the integration of the acquired businesses; |
loss of customers, suppliers, or key employees; and
the impact on the company's internal controls and compliance with the regulatory requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The company may not be able to successfully integrate any operations, personnel, services or products that it has acquired or may acquire in the future.
The company may seek to expand or enhance some of its operations by forming joint ventures or alliances with various strategic partners throughout the world. Entering into joint ventures and alliances also entails risks, including difficulties in developing and expanding the businesses of newly formed joint ventures, exercising influence over the activities of joint ventures in which the company does not have a controlling interest and potential conflicts with the company’s joint venture or alliance partners.
An inability to identify or complete future acquisitions could adversely affect future growth.
The company has historically followed a strategy of identifying and acquiring businesses with complementary products and services. As part of its growth strategy, the company intends to pursue acquisitions that provide opportunities for profitable growth and which enable it to leverage its competitive strengths. While the company continues to evaluate potential acquisitions, it may not be able to identify and successfully negotiate suitable acquisitions, obtain financing for future acquisitions on satisfactory terms, obtain regulatory approval for certain acquisitions, or otherwise complete acquisitions in the future. An inability to identify or complete future acquisitions could limit the company’s growth.
Expansion of the company’s operations internationally involves special challenges that it may not be able to meet. The company’s failure to meet these challenges could adversely affect its business, financial condition and operating results.
The company plans to continue to expand its operations internationally. The company faces certain risks inherent in doing business in international markets. These risks include:
extensive regulations and oversight, tariffs, including recently with respect to certain products imported from China or exported to China, retaliatory tariffs by China and certain other countries in response to tariffs implemented by the United States, and other trade barriers;
| |
• | reduced protection for intellectual property rights; |
withdrawal from or renegotiation of international trade agreements and other restrictions on trade between the United States and China, the European Union, Canada, Mexico and other countries;
effects of the United Kingdom's decision to exit the European Union and related potential disruption to trade;
recent outbreak of coronavirus in China and other jurisdictions and uncertain impact on operations, suppliers and customers;
reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
potentially adverse tax consequences;
limitations on ownership and on repatriation of earnings;
transportation delays and interruptions;
political, social, and economic instability and disruptions;
labor unrests;
• potential for nationalization of enterprises; and
• limitations on the company’s ability to enforce legal rights and remedies.
In addition, the company is and will be required to comply with the laws and regulations of foreign governmental and regulatory authorities of each country in which the company conducts business.
There can be no assurance that the company will be able to succeed in marketing its products and services in international markets. The company may also experience difficulty in managing its international operations because of, among other things, competitive conditions overseas, management of foreign exchange risk, established domestic markets, language and cultural differences and economic or political instability. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the success of the company’s international operations and, consequently, on the company’s business, financial condition and operating results.
The company is subject to currency fluctuations and other risks from its operations outside the United States.
The company has manufacturing and distribution operations located in Asia, Europe and Latin America. The company’s operations are subject to the impact of economic downturns, political instability and foreign trade restrictions, which may adversely affect the company’s business, financial condition and operating results. The company anticipates that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of consolidated net sales in the foreseeable future. Some sales and operating costs of the company’s foreign operations are realized in local currencies, and an increase in the relative value of the U.S. dollar against such currencies would lead to a reduction in consolidated sales and earnings. Additionally, foreign currency exposures are not fully hedged, and there can be no assurances that the company’s future results of operations will not be adversely affected by currency fluctuations. Furthermore, currency fluctuations may affect the prices paid to the company’s suppliers for materials the company uses in production. As a result, operating margins may also be negatively impacted by worldwide currency fluctuations that result in higher costs for certain cross-border transactions.
The company faces risks related to health epidemics and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, which could significantly disrupt our operations and impact our operating results.
In December 2019, a strain of coronavirus was identified in Wuhan, China. The spread of this virus and other contagious diseases, or other adverse public health developments, could have a material and adverse effect on our business operations. These could include disruptions or restrictions on our ability to travel, as well as temporary closures of our facilities or the facilities of our suppliers or customers. Any disruption of our suppliers or customers would likely impact our sales and operating results. The extent to which the coronavirus may impact our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus.
The company may not be able to adequately protect its intellectual property rights, and this inability may materially harm its business.
The company relies primarily on trade secret, copyright, service mark, trademark and patent law and contractual protections to protect the company’s proprietary technology and other proprietary rights. The company has filed numerous patent applications covering the company’s technology. Notwithstanding the precautions the company takes to protect its intellectual property rights, it is possible that third parties may copy or otherwise obtain and use the company’s proprietary technology without authorization or may otherwise infringe on the company’s rights. In some cases, including with respect to a number of the company’s most important products, there may be no effective legal recourse against duplication by competitors.competitors as the legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents and future patents we may own, or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Further, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the U.S. In the future, the company may have to rely on litigation to enforce its intellectual property rights, protect its trade secrets, determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Any such litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs to the company and diversions of the company’s resources, either of which could adversely affect the company’s business.
Any infringement by the company on patent rights of others could result in litigation and adversely affect its ability to continue to provide, or could increase the cost of providing, the company’s products and services.
Patents of third parties may have an important bearing on the company’s ability to offer some of its products and services. The company’s competitors, as well as other companies and individuals, may obtain patents related to the types of products and services the company offers or plans to offer. There can be no assurance that the company is or will be aware of all patents containing claims that may pose a risk of infringement by its products and services. In addition, some patent applications in the United States are confidential until a patent is issued and, therefore, the company cannot evaluate the extent to which its products and services may be covered or asserted to be covered by claims contained in pending patent applications. In general, if one or more of the company’s products or services were to infringe patents held by others, the company may be required to stop developing or marketing the products or services, to obtain licenses from the holders of the patents to develop and market the services, or to redesign the products or services in such a way as to avoid infringing on the patent claims. The company cannot assess the extent to which it may be required in the future to obtain licenses with respect to patents held by others, whether such licenses would be available or, if available, whether it would be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms. If the company were unable to obtain such licenses, it also may not be able to redesign the company’s products or services to avoid infringement, which could materially adversely affect the company’s business, financial condition and operating results.
The company may be the subject of product liability claims or product recalls, and it may be unable to obtain or maintain insurance adequate to cover potential liabilities.
Product liability is a significant commercial risk to the company. The company’s business exposes it to potential liability risks that arise from the manufacture, marketing and sale of the company’s products. In addition to direct expenditures for damages, settlement and defense costs, there is a possibility of adverse publicity as a result of product liability claims. Some plaintiffs in some jurisdictions have received substantial damage awards against companies based upon claims for injuries allegedly caused by the use of their products. In addition, it may be necessary for the company to recall products that do not meet approved specifications, which could result in adverse publicity as well as costs connected to the recall and loss of revenue.
The company cannot be certain that a product liability claim or series of claims brought against it would not have an adverse effect on the company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. If any claim is brought against the company, regardless of the success or failure of the claim, the company cannot assure you that it will be able to obtain or maintain product liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities or the cost of a recall. The company currently maintains insurance programs consisting of self-insurance up to certain limits and excess insurance coverage for claims over established limits. There can be no assurance that the company will be able to obtain insurance on acceptable terms or that its insurance programs will provide adequate protection against actual losses. In addition, the company is subject to the risk that one or more of its insurers may become insolvent or become unable to pay claims that may be made in the future.
An increase in warranty expenses could adversely affect the company’s financial performance.
The company offers purchasers of its products warranties covering workmanship and materials typically for one year and, in certain circumstances, for periods of up to ten years, during which periods the company or an authorized service representative will make repairs and replace parts that have become defective in the course of normal use. The company estimates and records its future warranty costs based upon past experience. These warranty expenses may increase in the future and may exceed the company’s warranty reserves, which, in turn, could adversely affect the company’s financial performance.
The company may be subject to litigation, environmental, and other legal compliance risks.
In addition to product liability claims, the company is subject to a variety of litigation, tax, and legal compliance risks. These risks include, among other things, possible liability relating to personal injuries, intellectual property rights, contract-related claims, taxes, environmental matters, and compliance with U.S. and foreign export laws, competition laws, and laws governing improper business practices. The company or one of its business units could be charged with wrongdoing as a result of such matters. If convicted or found liable, the company could be subject to significant fines, penalties, repayments, or other damages.
The company is subject to potential liability under environmental laws.
The company’s operations are regulated under a number of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the discharge of hazardous materials into the air and water as well as the handling, storage and disposal of these materials. Compliance with these environmental laws and regulations is a significant consideration for the company because it uses hazardous materials in its manufacturing processes. In addition, because the company is a generator of hazardous wastes, even if it fully complies with applicable environmental laws, it may be subject to financial exposure for costs associated with an investigation and remediation of sites at which it has arranged for the disposal of hazardous wastes if these sites become contaminated. In the event of a violation of environmental laws, the company could be held liable for damages and for the costs of remedial actions. Environmental laws could also become more stringent over time, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with any violation, which could negatively affect the company’s operating results. There can be no assurance that identification of presently unidentified environmental conditions, more vigorous enforcement by regulatory authorities, or other unanticipated events will not arise in the future and give rise to additional environmental liabilities, compliance costs, and penalties that could be material. Environmental laws and regulations are constantly evolving, and it is impossible to predict accurately the effect they may have upon the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the company.
We are subject to risks associated with possible climate change legislation, regulation and international accords.
Government mandates, standards or regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or projected climate change impacts have resulted, or are likely to result, in increased energy, manufacturing, transportation and raw material costs. Governmental requirements directed at regulation of greenhouse gas emissions could cause us to incur expenses that we cannot recover or that will require us to increase the price of products we sell to the point that it impacts demand for those products.
Unfavorable tax law changes and tax authority rulings may adversely affect results.
The company is subject to income taxes in the United States and in various foreign jurisdictions. Domestic and international tax liabilities are based on the income and expenses in various tax jurisdictions. The amount of the company’s income and other tax liability is subject to ongoing audits by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities and by non-U.S. authorities. If these audits result in assessments different from amounts recorded, future financial results may include unfavorable tax adjustments.
The company’s reputation, ability to do business, and results of operations may be impaired by improper conduct by any of its employees, agents, or business partners.
While the company strives to maintain high standards, the company cannot provide assurance that its internal controls and compliance systems will always protect it from acts committed by its employees, agents, or business partners that would violate U.S. and/or foreign laws or fail to protect the company’s confidential information, including the laws governing payments to government officials, bribery, fraud, anti-kickback and false claims rules, competition, export and import compliance, money laundering, and data privacy laws, as well as the improper use of proprietary information or social media. Any such violations of law or improper actions could subject the company to civil or criminal investigations in the U.S. and in other jurisdictions, could lead to substantial civil or criminal, monetary and non-monetary penalties, and related shareholder lawsuits, could lead to increased costs of compliance and could damage the company’s reputation.
The company’s financial performance is subject to significant fluctuations.
The company’s financial performance is subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations due to a number of factors, including:
• general economic conditions;
the lengthy, unpredictable sales cycle for commercial foodservice equipment, food processing equipment and residential kitchen equipment group;
• the gain or loss of significant customers;
• unexpected delays in new product introductions;
the level of market acceptance of new or enhanced versions of the company’s products;
• unexpected changes in the levels of the company’s operating expenses; and
• competitive product offerings and pricing actions.
Each of these factors could result in a material and adverse change in the company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The company may be unable to manage its growth.
The company has recently experienced rapid growth in business. Continued growth could place a strain on the company’s management, operations and financial resources. There also will be additional demands on the company’s sales, marketing and information systems and on the company’s administrative infrastructure as it develops and offers additional products and enters new markets. The company cannot be certain that the company’s operating and financial control systems, administrative infrastructure, outsourced and internal production capacity, facilities and personnel will be adequate to support the company’s future operations or to effectively adapt to future growth. If the company cannot manage the company’s growth effectively, the company’s business may be harmed.
The company’s business could suffer in the event of a work stoppage by its unionized labor force.
Because the company has a significant number of workers whose employment is subject to collective bargaining agreements and labor union representation, the company is vulnerable to possible organized work stoppages and similar actions. Unionized employees accounted for approximately 8%6% of the company’s workforce as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019. The company has union contracts with employees at its facilities in Windsor, California; Algona, Iowa; Elgin, Illinois; Easton, Pennsylvania and Lodi, Wisconsin that extend through December 2020, December 2018,2022, July 2017,2022, May 20192023 and December 2018,2021, respectively. The company also has a union workforce at its manufacturing facility in the Philippines under a contract that extends through June 2021. ApproximatelyLess than 1% of the company's workforce is covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire within one year. Any future strikes, employee slowdowns or similar actions by one or more unions, in connection with labor contract negotiations or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on the company’s ability to operate the company’s business.
The company depends significantly on its key personnel.
The company depends significantly on the company’s executive officers and certain other key personnel, whom could be difficult to replace. While the company has employment agreements with certain key executives, the company cannot be certain that it will succeed in retaining this personnel or their services under existing agreements. The incapacity, inability or unwillingness of certain of these people to perform their services may have a material adverse effect on the company. There is intense competition for qualified personnel within the company’s industry, and there can be no assurance that the company will be able to continue to attract, motivate and retain personnel with the skills and experience needed to successfully manage the company's business and operations.
The company may be subject to information technology system failures, network disruptions, cybersecurity attacks and breaches in data security, which may materially adversely affect the company’s operations, financial condition and operating results.
The company depends on information technology as an enabler to improve the effectiveness of its operations and to interface with its customers, as well as to maintain financial accuracy and efficiency. Information technology system failures, including suppliers’ or vendors’ system failures, could disrupt the company’s operations by causing transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, delays or cancellation of customer orders, the loss of customers, impediments to the manufacture or shipment of products, other business disruptions, or the loss of or damage to intellectual property through security breach.
The company’s information systems, or those of its third-party service providers, could also be penetrated by outside parties intent on extracting information, corrupting information or disrupting business processes. Such unauthorized access could disrupt the company’s business, andincrease costs and/or could result in the loss of assets. Cybersecurity attacks are becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information, corruption or destruction of data and corruptionother manipulation or improper use of data.systems or networks. These events could negatively impact the company’s customers andand/or reputation and lead to financial losses from remediation actions, loss of business, production downtimes, operational delays or potential liability, penalties, fines or an increaseother increases in expense, all of which may have a material adverse effect on the company’s business. In addition, as security threats and cybersecurity and data privacy and protection laws and regulations, including those related to the collection, storage, handling, use, disclosure, transfer, and security of personally identifiable information, continue to evolve and increase in terms of sophistication, we may invest additional resources in the security of our systems. Any such increased level of investment could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Further, as governmental authorities around the world continue to consider legislative and regulatory proposals concerning data protection, we may face substantial penalties if we fail to comply with regulations and laws regarding data protection.
The impact of future transactions on the company’s common stock is uncertain.
The company periodically reviews potential transactions related to products or product rights and businesses complementary to the company’s business. Such transactions could include mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, alliances or licensing agreements. In the future, the company may choose to enter into such transactions at any time. The impact of transactions on the market price of a company’s stock is often uncertain, but it may cause substantial fluctuations to the market price. Consequently, any announcement of any such transaction could have a material adverse effect upon the market price of the company’s common stock. Moreover, depending upon the nature of any transaction, the company may experience a charge to earnings, which could be material and could possibly have an adverse impact upon the market price of the company’s common stock.
The trading price of the company's common stock has been volatile, and investors in the company's common stock may experience substantial losses.
The trading price of the company's common stock has been volatile and may become volatile again in the future. The trading price of the company's common stock could decline or fluctuate in response to a variety of factors, including:
the company's failure to meet the performance estimates of securities analysts;
changes in buy/sell recommendations by securities analysts;
fluctuations in our operating results;
substantial sales of the company's common stockstock;
general stock market conditions; or
other economic or external factors.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
The company's principal executive offices are located in Elgin, Illinois. The company operates twenty-eightthirty-seven manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and twenty-threetwenty-eight manufacturing facilities internationally.
The principal properties of the company used to conduct business operations are listed below:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Principal Function | | Square
Footage | | Owned/
Leased | | Lease
Expiration |
| Commercial Foodservice: | | | | | | |
| Fort Smith, AR | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 440,200 |
| | Leased | | Aug-31 |
| Brea, CA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 80,700 |
| | Leased | | September 2020Sep-20 |
| Vacaville, CA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 81,200 |
| | Leased | | June 2026May-27 |
| Windsor, CA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 75,000 |
| | Leased | | October 2022Apr-22 |
| Elgin, IL | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 207,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Mundelein, IL | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 70,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Rockton, IL | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 339,400 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| South Beloit, IL | | Warehousing | | 130,900 |
| | Leased | | Jun-23 |
| Menominee, MI | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 60,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
St. Louis, MOFuquay-Varina, NC | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 46,900183,900 |
| | LeasedOwned | | August 2017N/A |
| Bow, NH | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 100,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Concord, NH | | Warehousing | | 39,000 |
| | Leased | | Mar-20 |
| Pembroke, NH | | Warehousing | | 111,900136,200 |
| | Leased | | July 2024Nov-24 |
Fuquay-Varina, NCDayton, OH | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 138,90037,700 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Tualatin, OR | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 16,500 |
| | Leased | | Dec-20 |
| Bethlehem, PA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 71,70072,900 |
| | Leased | | December 2024Dec-24 |
| Easton, PA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 156,700 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Smithville, TN | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 268,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Allen, TX | | Warehousing | | 33,100 |
| | Leased | | Feb-24 |
| Carrollton, TX | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 132,400 |
| | Leased | | August 2022 |
Burlington, VT | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 135,400 |
| | Owned | | N/AAug-22 |
| Essex Junction, VT | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices * | | 100,000270,000 |
| | LeasedOwned | | June 2024N/A |
| Redmond, WA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 42,400 |
| | Leased | | May 2022May-22 |
| Seattle, WA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 12,200 |
| | Leased | | Aug-22 |
| New South Wales, Australia | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 204,900 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
Shanghai,Toronto, Canada | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 101,500 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Humen, China | | Manufacturing, Warehousing | | 10,900 |
| | Leased | | Mar-20 |
| Qingdao City, China | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 74,000113,500 |
| | Leased | | April 2020Jul-29 |
| Brøndby, Denmark | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 50,900 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Randers, Denmark | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 78,50050,100 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Viljandi, Estonia | | Manufacturing and Offices | | 47,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Nusco, Italy | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 24,200260,600 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Scandicci, Italy | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 37,600 |
| | Leased | | April 2025Apr-25 |
| Sedico, Italy | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 52,500 |
| | Leased | | Feb-24 |
| Nogales, Mexico | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 127,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Laguna, the Philippines | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 115,200 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Wiślina, Poland | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 40,00077,500 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Pineda de Mar, Spain | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 50,100 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Fristad, Sweden | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 173,800 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Lincoln, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 100,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
Warwickshire, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 12,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Wrexham, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 62,600 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Principal Function | | Square
Footage | | Owned/
Leased | | Lease
Expiration |
| Food Processing: | | | | | | | | |
| Gainesville, GA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 106,000107,400 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
Chicago,Elgin, IL | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 64,40025,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Elk Grove, IL | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 101,500 |
| | Leased | | March 2019Nov-29 |
| Algona, IA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 70,100 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Clayton, NC | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 65,30065,000 |
| | Leased | | October 2019Oct-24 |
| Maysville, OK | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 36,700 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Souderton, PA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 35,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Plano, TX | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 339,100 |
| | Leased | | April 2022Apr-22 |
| Waynesboro, VA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 26,400 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Bothell, WA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 23,600 |
| | Leased | | May-25 |
| Lodi, WI | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 114,600 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Aalborg, Denmark | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 68,300 |
| | Leased | | Dec-22 |
| Mauron, France | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 98,000112,400 |
| | Leased | | January 2023Dec-22 |
| Reichenau, Germany | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 57,900 |
| | LeasedOwned | | December 2023N/A |
| Bangalore, India | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 75,000 |
| | Leased | | February 2022Mar-24 |
| Castelnuovo Rangone, Italy | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 26,900 |
| | Leased | | Dec-23 |
| Norwich, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 39,20030,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Location | | Principal Function | | Square
Footage | | Owned/
Leased | | Lease
Expiration |
| Residential Kitchen: | | | | | | | | |
Baldwin Park,Chino, CA | | Warehousing and Offices | | 61,400100,000 |
| | Leased | | April 2017Feb-22 |
Downey,Redwood City, CA | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 122,50020,600 |
| | Leased | | December 2019Jan-20 |
Suwanee,Buford, GA | | Warehousing and Offices | | 142,000178,100 |
| | Leased | | January 2018Feb-23 |
| Greenville, MI | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 225,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Greenwood, MS | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices *** | | 738,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Brown Deer, WI | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 144,800165,400 |
| | Leased | | May 2022 |
Rosyl St Pierre, France | | Manufacturing and Warehousing | | 40,900 |
| | Owned | | N/AMay-22 |
| Saint Ouen L'aumone, France | | Manufacturing, and Warehousing | | 30,400 |
| | Leased | | April 2021 |
Saint Symphorien, France | | Manufacturing and Warehousing | | 138,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Waterford, Ireland | | Manufacturing, Warehousing and Offices | | 73,000 |
| | Leased | | July 2027Jul-27 |
| Adderbury, the United Kingdom | | Warehousing and Offices | | 82,500 |
| | Leased | | August 2020 |
Coalbrookdale, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing and Offices | | 153,100 |
| | Owned | | N/AAug-20 |
| Ketley, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing and Offices | | 217,300 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Leamington Spa, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing and Offices | | 270,200 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
| Leamington Spa, the United Kingdom | | Warehousing and Offices | | 100,300 |
| | Leased | | August 2019Aug-29 |
| Nottingham, the United Kingdom | | Manufacturing and Offices | | 153,100 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
Gee Targu Mures, Romania | | Manufacturing and Warehousing | | 48,000 |
| | Owned | | N/A |
* Contains threetwo separate manufacturing facilities.
** Contains four separate manufacturing facilities.
At various other locations the company leases small amounts of space for administrative, manufacturing, distribution and sales functions, and in certain instances limited short-term inventory storage. These locations are in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dubai, France, India, Italy, Mexico, Russia, Spain, the United Kingdom and various locations in the United States.
Management believes that these facilities are adequate for the operation of the company's business as presently conducted.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The company is routinely involved in litigation incidental to its business, including product liability claims, which are partially covered by insurance or in certain cases by indemnification provisions under purchase agreements for recently acquired companies. Such routine claims are vigorously contested and management does not believe that the outcome of any such pending litigation will have a material effect upon the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the company.
Item 4. Mine Safety Issues
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Principal Market
The company's Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "MIDD". The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices per share of Common Stock, as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Closing Share Price |
| | High | | Low |
| Fiscal 2016 | | | |
| First quarter | $ | 108.38 |
| | $ | 80.62 |
|
| Second quarter | 126.52 |
| | 103.39 |
|
| Third quarter | 132.17 |
| | 112.94 |
|
| Fourth quarter | 142.38 |
| | 109.23 |
|
| Fiscal 2015 | |
| | |
|
| First quarter | $ | 109.00 |
| | $ | 93.34 |
|
| Second quarter | 114.75 |
| | 100.98 |
|
| Third quarter | 124.08 |
| | 102.71 |
|
| Fourth quarter | 120.33 |
| | 102.65 |
|
Shareholders
The company estimates there were approximately 81,91360,247 record holders of the company's common stock as of February 27, 2017.24, 2020.
Dividends
The company does not currently pay cash dividends on its common stock. Any future payment of cash dividends on the company’s common stock will be at the discretion of the company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon the company’s results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. The company’s Board of Directors currently intends to retain any future earnings to support its operations and to finance the growth and development of the company’s business and does not intend to declare or pay cash dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future. In addition, the company’s revolving credit facility limits its ability to declare or pay dividends on its common stock.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
For information pertaining to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and the related weighted
average exercise price, see Part III, Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.”
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares Purchased |
| | Average Price Paid per Share |
| | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program |
| | Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet be
Purchased
Under the Plan
or Program (1) |
|
October 2September 29 to October 29, 201626, 2019 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | 2,566,7622,373,800 |
|
October 3027 to November 26, 201623, 2019 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,566,7622,373,800 |
|
November 2724 to December 31, 201628, 2019 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,566,7622,373,800 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 201628, 2019 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | 2,566,7622,373,800 |
|
(1) In July 1998,November 2017, the company's Board of Directors adoptedapproved a stock repurchase program. This program and subsequently authorizedauthorizes the purchasecompany to repurchase in the aggregate up to 2,500,000 shares of its outstanding common sharesstock in open market purchases. During 2013, the company's Board of Directors authorized the purchase of additional common shares in open market purchases.purchases or negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2016, the total number of shares authorized for repurchase under the program is 4,570,266. As of December 31, 2016, 2,003,50428, 2019, 126,200 shares had been purchased under the 19982017 stock repurchase program. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had a total of 4,905,5496,940,089 shares in treasury amounting to $205.3 million.$451.3 million.
In the consolidated financial statements, the company also treats shares withheld for tax purposes on behalf of employees in connection with the vesting of restricted share grants as common stock repurchases because they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting. These withheld shares are not considered common stock repurchases under the authorized common stock repurchase plan and accordingly are not included in the common stock repurchase totals in the preceding table.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Fiscal Year Ended(1, 2)
| | | | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
| | 2014 |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2017 |
| | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
|
| Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 2,267,852 |
| | $ | 1,826,598 |
| | $ | 1,636,538 |
| | $ | 1,428,685 |
| | $ | 1,038,174 |
| $ | 2,959,446 |
| | $ | 2,722,931 |
| | $ | 2,335,542 |
| | $ | 2,267,852 |
| | $ | 1,826,598 |
|
| Cost of sales | 1,366,672 |
| | 1,120,093 |
| | 995,953 |
| | 878,674 |
| | 635,185 |
| 1,855,949 |
| | 1,718,791 |
| | 1,422,801 |
| | 1,366,672 |
| | 1,120,093 |
|
| Gross profit | 901,180 |
| | 706,505 |
| | 640,585 |
| | 550,011 |
| | 402,989 |
| 1,103,497 |
| | 1,004,140 |
| | 912,741 |
| | 901,180 |
| | 706,505 |
|
| Selling and distribution expenses | 223,883 |
| | 193,353 |
| | 182,578 |
| | 155,639 |
| | 106,129 |
| |
| General and administrative expenses | 220,548 |
| | 181,795 |
| | 157,016 |
| | 140,809 |
| | 108,776 |
| |
| Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 593,813 |
| | 538,842 |
| | 468,219 |
| | 471,638 |
| | 378,366 |
|
| Restructuring expenses | 10,524 |
| | 28,754 |
| | 7,078 |
| | 9,101 |
| | — |
| 10,480 |
| | 19,332 |
| | 19,951 |
| | 10,524 |
| | 28,754 |
|
| Gain on litigation settlement | — |
| | — |
| | (6,519 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (14,839 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Gain on sale of plant | | — |
| | — |
| | (12,042 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Impairment of intangible asset | | — |
| | — |
| | 58,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Income from operations | 446,225 |
| | 302,603 |
| | 300,432 |
| | 244,462 |
| | 188,084 |
| 514,043 |
| | 445,966 |
| | 378,613 |
| | 419,018 |
| | 299,385 |
|
| Net interest expense and deferred financing amortization, net | 23,880 |
| | 16,967 |
| | 15,592 |
| | 15,901 |
| | 9,238 |
| |
| Other expense (income), net | 1,040 |
| | 4,469 |
| | 4,050 |
| | 2,780 |
| | 4,406 |
| |
| Interest expense and deferred financing amortization, net | | 82,609 |
| | 58,742 |
| | 25,983 |
| | 23,880 |
| | 16,967 |
|
| Net periodic pension benefit (other than service costs) | | (28,857 | ) | | (38,114 | ) | | (31,728 | ) | | (27,207 | ) | | (3,218 | ) |
| Other (income) expense, net | | (2,328 | ) | | 1,825 |
| | 829 |
| | 1,040 |
| | 4,469 |
|
| Earnings before income taxes | 421,305 |
| | 281,167 |
| | 280,790 |
| | 225,781 |
| | 174,440 |
| 462,619 |
| | 423,513 |
| | 383,529 |
| | 421,305 |
| | 281,167 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | 137,089 |
| | 89,557 |
| | 87,478 |
| | 71,853 |
| | 53,743 |
| 110,379 |
| | 106,361 |
| | 85,401 |
| | 137,089 |
| | 89,557 |
|
| Net earnings | $ | 284,216 |
| | $ | 191,610 |
| | $ | 193,312 |
| | $ | 153,928 |
| | $ | 120,697 |
| $ | 352,240 |
| | $ | 317,152 |
| | $ | 298,128 |
| | $ | 284,216 |
| | $ | 191,610 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
| | $ | 3.41 |
| | $ | 2.76 |
| | $ | 2.22 |
| $ | 6.33 |
| | $ | 5.71 |
| | $ | 5.26 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
| | $ | 3.40 |
| | $ | 2.74 |
| | $ | 2.20 |
| $ | 6.33 |
| | $ | 5.70 |
| | $ | 5.26 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average number of shares outstanding: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | 57,030 |
| | 56,951 |
| | 56,764 |
| | 55,831 |
| | 54,377 |
| 55,647 |
| | 55,576 |
| | 56,715 |
| | 57,030 |
| | 56,951 |
|
| Diluted | 57,085 |
| | 56,973 |
| | 56,784 |
| | 56,148 |
| | 54,807 |
| 55,656 |
| | 55,604 |
| | 56,719 |
| | 57,085 |
| | 56,973 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance Sheet Data: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Working capital | $ | 323,290 |
| | $ | 285,191 |
| | $ | 285,817 |
| | $ | 234,349 |
| | $ | 170,167 |
| $ | 616,059 |
| | $ | 502,642 |
| | $ | 458,236 |
| | $ | 323,290 |
| | $ | 285,191 |
|
| Total assets | 2,917,136 |
| | 2,761,151 |
| | 2,066,131 |
| | 1,819,206 |
| | 1,244,280 |
| 5,002,143 |
| | 4,549,781 |
| | 3,339,713 |
| | 2,917,136 |
| | 2,761,151 |
|
| Total debt | 732,126 |
| | 766,061 |
| | 598,167 |
| | 571,598 |
| | 260,070 |
| 1,873,140 |
| | 1,892,105 |
| | 1,028,881 |
| | 732,126 |
| | 766,061 |
|
| Stockholders' equity | 1,265,318 |
| | 1,166,830 |
| | 1,006,760 |
| | 838,347 |
| | 650,027 |
| 1,946,814 |
| | 1,665,203 |
| | 1,361,148 |
| | 1,265,318 |
| | 1,166,830 |
|
| |
| (1) | The company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to December 31. |
| |
| (2) | The company has acquired numerous businesses in the periods presented. Please see FootnoteNote 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains "forward-looking statements" subject to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause the company's actual results, performance or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. The following are some of the important factors that could cause the company's actual results, performance or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
changing market conditions;
volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses, which may occur irregularly and in varying amounts;
variability in financing costs;
quarterly variations in operating results;
dependence on key customers;
risks associated with the company's foreign operations, including market acceptance and demand for the company's products and the company's ability to manage the risk associated with the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
the company's ability to protect its trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property;
the impact of competitive products and pricing;
the impact of announced management and organizational changes;
the state of the residential construction, housing and home improvement markets;
the state of the credit markets, including mortgages, home equity loans and consumer credit;
the company's ability to maintain and grow the Viking reputation and brand image;
intense competition in the company's business segments including the impact of both new and established global competitors;
unfavorable tax law changes and tax authority rulings;
cybersecurity attacks and other breaches in security;
the continued ability to realize profitable growth through the sourcing and completion of strategic acquisitions;
the timely development and market acceptance of the company's products; and
the availability and cost of raw materials.
The company cautions readers to carefully consider the statements set forth in the section entitled "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of this filing and discussion of risks included in the company's SEC filings.
NET SALES SUMMARY
(dollars in thousands)
| | Fiscal Year Ended(1) | Fiscal Year Ended(1) | Fiscal Year Ended(1) |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Sales | | Percent | | Sales | | Percent | | Sales | | Percent | Sales | | Percent | | Sales | | Percent | | Sales | | Percent |
| Business Segments: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial Foodservice | $ | 1,266,955 |
| | 55.9 | % | | $ | 1,121,046 |
| | 61.4 | % | | $ | 1,041,228 |
| | 63.6 | % | $ | 1,984,345 |
| | 67.1 | % | | $ | 1,729,814 |
| | 63.5 | % | | $ | 1,382,108 |
| | 59.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Food Processing | 342,235 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 297,712 |
| | 16.3 |
| | 322,783 |
| | 19.7 |
| 400,951 |
| | 13.5 |
| | 389,594 |
| | 14.3 |
| | 352,717 |
| | 15.1 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential Kitchen | 658,662 |
| | 29.0 |
| | 407,840 |
| | 22.3 |
| | 272,527 |
| | 16.7 |
| 574,150 |
| | 19.4 |
| | 603,523 |
| | 22.2 |
| | 600,717 |
| | 25.7 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 2,267,852 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,826,598 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,636,538 |
| | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,959,446 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,722,931 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,335,542 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| |
| (1) | The company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to December 31. |
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items in the consolidated statements of earnings as a percentage of net sales for the periods presented:
| | | | Fiscal Year Ended(1) | Fiscal Year Ended(1) |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net sales | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| Cost of sales | 60.3 |
| | 61.3 |
| | 60.9 |
| 62.7 |
| | 63.1 |
| | 60.9 |
|
| Gross profit | 39.7 |
| | 38.7 |
| | 39.1 |
| 37.3 |
| | 36.9 |
| | 39.1 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 19.6 |
| | 20.6 |
| | 20.7 |
| 20.1 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 20.0 |
|
| Restructuring expenses | 0.5 |
| | 1.6 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| Restructuring | | 0.3 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.9 |
|
| Gain on litigation settlement | — |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | (0.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Gain on sale of plant | | — |
| | — |
| | (0.5 | ) |
| Impairment of intangible assets | | — |
| | — |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Income from operations | 19.6 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 18.4 |
| 17.4 |
| | 16.4 |
| | 16.2 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Interest expense and deferred financing amortization, net | 1.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 1.0 |
| 2.9 |
| | 2.2 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Other expense, net | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| |
| Net periodic pension benefit (other than service costs) | | (1.0 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | (1.3 | ) |
| Other (income) expense, net | | (0.1 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
| Earnings before income taxes | 18.5 |
| | 15.4 |
| | 17.1 |
| 15.6 |
| | 15.5 |
| | 16.4 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | 6.0 |
| | 4.9 |
| | 5.3 |
| 3.7 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 3.7 |
|
| Net earnings | 12.5 | % | | 10.5 | % | | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 12.7 | % |
| |
| (1) | The company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to December 31. |
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 201628, 2019 as Compared to January 2, 2016December 29, 2018
Net salesNET SALES. Net sales in fiscal 20162019 increased by $441.3$236.5 million, or 24.2%8.7%, to $2,267.9$2,959.4 million as compared to $1,826.6$2,722.9 million in fiscal 2015.2018. The increase in net sales of $409.6$278.9 million, or 22.4%10.2%, was attributable to acquisition growth, resulting from the fiscal 20152018 acquisitions of Goldstein Eswood, Marsal, Induc, Thurne, AGAHinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, Firex, Josper, Taylor, M-TEK, and LynxCrown and the fiscal 2016 acquisition2019 acquisitions of Follett.EVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, Pacproinc, Synesso, and Brava. Excluding acquisitions and closure of a non-core business, net sales increased $31.7decreased $33.3 million, or 1.7%1.2%, from the prior year. The impact of foreign exchange rates on foreign sales translated into U.S. Dollars for fiscal 2016 reduced2019 decreased net sales by approximately $39.9$36.1 million or 2.2%1.3%. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, organicacquisitions and closure of a non-core business, sales growth amount to 3.9%increased 0.1% for the year, including a net sales increase of 5.5%1.6% at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, a net sales increasedecrease of 13.7%3.3% at the Food Processing Equipment Group and a net sales decrease of 7.7%2.0% at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group.
Net sales of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group increased by $146.0$254.5 million, or 13.0%14.7%, to $1,267.0$1,984.3 million in fiscal 2016,2019 as compared to $1,121.0$1,729.8 million in fiscal 2015.2018. Net sales from the acquisitions of Goldstein Eswood, Marsal, InducFirex, Josper, Taylor, Crown, EVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, and FollettSynesso, which were acquired on January 30, 2015, FebruaryApril 27, 2018, May 10, 2015, May 30, 2015,2018, June 22, 2018, December 3, 2018, December 31, 2018, April 1, 2019, April 1, 2019, June 15, 2019, and May 31, 2016,November 27, 2019, respectively, accounted for an increase of $106.0$247.1 million during fiscal 2016.2019. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group increased $40.0$7.4 million, or 3.6%0.4%, as compared to the prior year. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange organicand acquisitions, net sales increased $62.2$27.2 million, or 5.5%1.6% at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Domestically, the company realized a sales increase of $70.1$158.8 million, or 8.9%13.5%, to $853.9$1,334.8 million, as compared to $783.8$1,176.0 million in the prior year. This includes an increase of $90.4$158.3 million from recent acquisitions. Excluding acquisitions, net sales decreased $20.3 million, or 2.6%. The decline in domestic sales reflect the impact of several large rollouts with major restaurant chain customers in the prior year period.were relatively flat. International sales increased $75.9$95.7 million, or 22.5%17.3%, to $413.1$649.5 million, as compared to $337.2$553.8 million in the prior year. This includes the increase of $15.6$88.8 million from the recent acquisitions offset by $22.2and a decrease of $19.8 million related to the unfavorable impact of exchange rates. Excluding acquisitions and foreign exchange, effect,the net sales increased $82.5increase in international sales was $26.7 million, or 24.5%4.8%. StrongThe increase in international growth continued in all regions due to more favorable market conditions thanrevenues reflects strengthening of sales in the prior yearAsian and growth with local restaurant chain concepts.Latin American markets.
Net sales of the Food Processing Equipment Group increased by $44.5$11.4 million, or 14.9%2.9%, to $342.2$401.0 million in fiscal 2016,2019, as compared to $297.7$389.6 million in fiscal 2015.2018. Net sales from the acquisitionacquisitions of ThurneHinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, M-TEK and Pacproinc, which waswere acquired on February 16, 2018, April 7, 2015,3, 2018, October 1, 2018, and July 16, 2019 respectively, accounted for an increase of $5.6$29.3 million. Excluding the impact of this acquisition,acquisitions, net sales of the Food Processing Equipment Group increased $38.9decreased $17.9 million, or 13.1%4.6%. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange organicand acquisitions net sales increased $40.7decreased $12.7 million, or 13.7%3.3% at the Food Processing Equipment Group. Domestically, the company realized a sales increasedecrease of $58.0$17.1 million, or 29.5%6.5%, to $254.4$246.6 million, as compared to $196.4$263.7 million in the prior year. This includes an increase of $5.3$24.1 million from the recent acquisition.acquisitions. Excluding this acquisition,acquisitions, net sales increased $52.7decreased $41.2 million, or 26.8%15.6%. International sales decreased $13.5increased $28.5 million, or 13.3%22.6%, to $87.8$154.4 million, as compared to $101.3$125.9 million in the prior year. This includes the increase of $0.3$5.2 million from the recent acquisition, offset by $1.8 million related to the unfavorable impact of exchange rates. The overall net sales growth at the Food Processing Equipment Group reflects revenue recognized from a strong backlog and continued strong incoming order levels as customers continue to upgrade facilities to new technologies and expand capacity to meet growing demand. The variability in growth rates for domestic and international sales reflects the shift in mix related to the timing of certain larger projects in differing geographic regions that regularly occur between comparative periods.
Net sales of the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group increased by $250.9 million or 61.5% to $658.7 million in fiscal 2016, as compared to $407.8 million in fiscal 2015. Net sales from the acquisitions of AGA and Lynx which were acquired on September 23, 2015 and December 15, 2015, respectively, accounted for an increase of $298.0 million. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, net sales of the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group decreased $47.1 million, or 11.5%. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, organic net sales decreased $31.2 million, or 7.7% at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. This decrease is net of price increases, which are estimated to have added 2.0% to net sales in comparison to the prior year. Domestically, the company realized a sales increase of $67.7 million, or 23.0%, to $362.3 million, as compared to $294.6 million in the prior year. This includes an increase of $93.0 million from recent acquisitions. Excluding acquisitions, net sales decreased $25.3 million, or 8.6%. International sales increased $183.2 million, or 161.8% to $296.4 million, as compared to $113.2 million in the prior year. This includes an increase of $205.0 million from recent acquisitions and a reductiondecrease of $15.9$5.2 million related to the unfavorable impact of exchange rates. Excluding acquisitions and foreign exchange, effect,the net sales decrease in international sales was $28.5 million, or 22.6%. Revenues for the Food Processing Equipment Group have been affected by the timing and deferral of certain larger projects.
Net sales of the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group decreased by $29.4 million, or 4.9%, to $574.1 million in fiscal 2019, as compared to $603.5 million in fiscal 2018. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, the acquisition of Brava, acquired November, 19, 2019, and closure of a non-core business, net sales decreased $5.9$11.7 million, or 5.2%2.0% at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. Domestically, the company realized a sales decrease of $4.0 million, or 1.1%, to $362.7 million, as compared to $366.7 million in the prior year. Excluding acquisitions and closure of a non-core business the net sales decrease in domestic sales was $4.7 million, or 1.3%. OrganicInternational sales growth fordecreased $25.4 million, or 10.7% to $211.4 million, as compared to $236.8 million in the yearprior year. This includes an unfavorable impact of exchange rates of $11.1 million. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, acquisition, and closure of a non-core business the net sales decrease in international sales was adversely impacted by lower$7.0 million, or 3.1%. The decrease in international revenues reflects decline of sales at U-Line due to a prior year new product launch resulting in higher sales to dealers. Additionally, sales continued to be affected by the 2015 recall of certain Viking products manufactured prior to 2013 and Middleby's acquisition of Viking.European market.
Gross profit
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased by $194.7$99.4 million to $901.2$1,103.5 million in fiscal 20162019 from $706.5$1,004.1 million in fiscal 2015. The increase in the gross profit reflects2018, reflecting the impact of increased sales from revenue growthacquisitions and acquisition sales, offset by theunfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates which reduced gross profit by $13.2of $12.1 million. The gross margin rate increased from 38.7%36.9% in 20152018 to 39.7%37.3% in 2016.2019. The gross margin rate in fiscal 2019 excluding acquisitions and impact of foreign exchange was 37.9%.
Gross profit at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group increased by $75.0$88.1 million, or 16.4%13.4%, to $532.9$746.6 million in fiscal 20162019 as compared to $457.9$658.5 million in fiscal 2015.2018. Gross profit from the acquisitions of Goldstein Eswood, Marsal, Induc,Firex, Josper, Taylor, Crown, EVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, and FollettSynesso, accounted for approximately $36.9$73.3 million of the increase in gross profit during fiscal 2016.2019. Excluding the recent acquisitions, the gross profit increased by approximately $38.1$14.8 million on the higher sales volumes.largely due to selling prices. The impact of foreign exchange rates reduceddecreased gross profit by approximately $5.8$6.1 million. The gross profit margin rate increaseddecreased to 42.1%37.6% as compared to 40.8%38.1% in the prior year, primarily due primarily to changeslower margins at recent acquisitions. The gross margin rate in sales mixfiscal 2019 excluding acquisitions and efficiency gains, as compared to the prior year period.impact of foreign exchange was 38.7%.
Gross profit at the Food Processing Equipment Group increased by $21.6$8.6 million, or 18.6%6.4%, to $137.7$142.2 million in fiscal 20162019 as compared to $116.1$133.6 million in fiscal 2015.2018. Gross profit from the acquisitionacquisitions of ThurneHinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, M-TEK and Pacproinc, accounted for approximately $3.0$12.8 million of the increase in gross profit during fiscal 2016.2019. Excluding the recent acquisition,acquisitions, the gross profit increaseddecreased by approximately $18.6$4.2 million based on higherlower sales volumes. The impact of foreign exchange rates reduceddecreased gross profit by approximately $1.6$2.1 million. The gross profit margin rate increased to 40.2%35.5% in fiscal 20162019 as compared to 39.0%34.3% in fiscal 2015.the prior year, reflecting the impact of acquisitions. The increase in the gross margin rate reflects the favorable impact of ongoing cost efficiency initiatives related to recentin fiscal 2019 excluding acquisitions and favorable sales mix.
Gross profit at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group increased by $101.8 million, or 77.8%, to $232.7 million in fiscal 2016 as compared to $130.9 million in fiscal 2015. Gross profit from the acquisitions of AGA and Lynx accounted for approximately $96.3 million of the increase in gross profit during fiscal 2016. Excluding the recent acquisitions, the gross profit increased by approximately $5.5 million on lower sales volumes offsetting price increases. The impact of foreign exchange rates reduced gross profit by approximately $5.8 million. The gross margin rate increased to 35.3% in fiscal 2016 as compared to 32.1% in fiscal 2015, due to improved margins at Viking as a result of continued efficiency gains and AGA profitability improvements recognized in connection with ongoing integration initiatives.
was 34.9%.
| |
| • | Gross profit at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group decreased by $0.3 million, or 0.1%, to $216.8 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to $217.1 million in fiscal 2018. Gross profit was offset by unfavorable foreign exchange rates of $3.9 million. The gross margin rate increased to 37.8% in fiscal 2019 as compared to 36.0% in the prior year. The gross margin rate in fiscal 2019 excluding acquisitions and impact of foreign exchange was 37.7%. |
Selling, general and administrative expensesSELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $50.9$55.0 million to $454.9$593.8 million in fiscal 20162019 from $404.0$538.8 million in 2015.2018. As a percentage of net sales, operatingselling, general and administrative expenses amounted to 19.6%20.1% in fiscal 20162019 and 20.5%19.8% in fiscal 2015, excluding restructuring charges.2018.
Selling, general and administrative expenses reflect increased $30.5 million to $223.9 million from $193.4 million in the prior year period. Selling expenses increased $43.4costs of $64.3 million associated with the Goldstein Eswood, Thurne, Induc, AGA, Lynx,fiscal 2018 acquisitions of Hinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, Firex, Josper, Taylor, M-TEK, and Follett acquisitions. ThisCrown and the fiscal 2019 acquisitions of EVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, Pacproinc, Synesso, and Brava, including $19.6 million of non-cash intangible amortization expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $10.0 million related to transition costs with the former Chairman and CEO upon his retirement in February 2019 and $5.6 million related to higher non-cash share based compensation. The increase was offset by the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates of $3.4 million, reduced compensation and commissions of $2.5$7.6 million and $13.6 million related to lower trade advertising expense of $2.1 million.compensation costs.
General and administrativeRESTRUCTURING EXPENSES. Restructuring expenses increased $38.7decreased $8.8 million to $220.5$10.5 million from $181.8$19.3 million in the prior year period. GeneralIn fiscal 2019, restructuring charges related primarily to headcount reductions and administrative expenses increased 36.6 million associated with the Goldstein Eswood, Thurne, Induc, AGA, Lynx, and Follett acquisitions, including $8.8 million of non-cash intangible amortization expense. The general and administrative increase from acquisitions also includes the net periodic pension benefit related to the AGA pension plans which amount to $24.5 million.
Restructuring expenses decreased $18.3 million to $10.5 million from $28.8 million in the prior year period. Restructuring expenses during fiscal 2016 are related to acquisition integration initiatives to reduce costs related to AGA. Restructuring expenses during fiscal 2015 were associated with cost reductionsreduction initiatives related to AGA,facility consolidations at the closureCommercial Foodservice Equipment Group and consolidationResidential Kitchen Equipment Group. During fiscal 2018, restructuring charges related primarily to exiting operations of distribution facilities ata non-core business in the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group, and the consolidation of two production facilitiesas well as headcount reductions at the Food Processing and Commercial Foodservice Equipment Groups.Group and additional cost reduction initiatives related to the AGA Group.
IncomeGAIN ON LITIGATION SETTLEMENT. During the fourth quarter, we reached a settlement with respect to a lawsuit filed by the Company arising from operationsa prior acquisition included in the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. The gain associated with this settlement, which is net of the release of funds in escrow, is reflected in the consolidated statement of earnings.
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS. Income from operations increased $143.6$68.0 million to $446.2$514.0 million in fiscal 20162019 from $302.6$446.0 million in fiscal 2015.2018. Operating income as a percentage of net sales amounted to 17.4% in 2019 as compared to 16.4% in 2018. The increase in operating income resulted from the increase in net sales and gross profit, offset in partpartially by increased operating expenses. Operating income in fiscal 2019 included the gain on litigation settlement, offset by the transition costs related to the former Chairman and CEO. Excluding the impact of restructuring expenses.expenses and gain on litigation settlement, offset by the transition costs related to the former Chairman and CEO, operating income increased $54.5 million to $519.8 million in fiscal 2019 from $465.3 million in fiscal 2018. Operating income as a percentage of net sales, excluding those items, amounted to 19.6%17.6% in 2016 as compared to 16.5% in 2015. Excluding the impact of restructuring expenses, operating income as a percentage of net sales amounted to 20.1% in 20162019 in comparison to 18.1%17.1% in 2015, reflecting an increase in the net periodic pension benefit and ongoing cost reduction initiatives.2018.
Income from operations in 20162019 included $84.0$110.0 million of non-cash expenses, including $26.2$37.9 million of depreciation expense, $29.9$64.0 million of intangible amortization related to acquisitions and $27.9$8.1 million of stock based compensation. This compares to $68.8$98.3 million of non-cash expenses in the prior year, including $25.5$35.8 million of depreciation expense, $27.4$60.0 million of intangible amortization related to acquisitions and $15.9$2.5 million of stock based compensation costs.
Non-operating expensesNON-OPERATING EXPENSES. Non-operating expenses increased $3.4$29.0 million to $24.9$51.4 million of expense in fiscal 2019 from $22.4 million of income in fiscal 2018. Net interest expense and deferred financing increased $23.9 million to $82.6 million in fiscal 20162019 from $21.5$58.7 million in fiscal 2015. Net2018 reflecting higher interest expense increased $6.9 million from $17.0 million in fiscal 2015 to $23.9 million in fiscal 2016 reflecting increased interest due torates and higher debt balances related to the funding of acquisitions. Other expense was $1.0Net periodic pension benefit (other than service costs) increased $9.2 million to $28.9 million in fiscal 2016 as compared to $4.52019 from $38.1 million in fiscal 2015 and consists mainly of net foreign exchange losses attributable2018, related to the strengthening ofincrease in discount rate used to calculate the U.S. Dollar.interest cost and lower expected returns on assets driven by lower asset values for fiscal 2019.
Income taxesINCOME TAXES. A tax provision of $137.1$110.4 million, at an effective rate of 32.5%23.9%, was recorded for fiscal 20162019 as compared to $89.6$106.4 million at an effective rate of 31.9%25.1%, in fiscal 2015. The current year effective tax rate is comprised of a 35.0% U.S. federal tax rate and 2.3% in U.S. state income taxes, 0.3% in other adjustments, net of 2.4% in U.S. domestic manufacturers deduction, 1.6% in permanent tax deductions and 1.1% in foreign rate differentials.2018. In comparison to the prior year the tax provision reflects favorable tax adjustments for a 0.6%refund of foreign taxes, enacted tax rate changes in several foreign jurisdictions and adjustments for the finalization of 2018 tax returns. The effective rates in 2019 and 2018 are higher effectivethan the federal tax rate impact mostly relatedof 21% primarily due to a decrease instate taxes, non-deductible expenses and foreign tax rate differentials and an increase in permanent tax benefits.differentials.
Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 as Compared to January 3, 2015December 30, 2017
Net salesNET SALES. Net sales in fiscal 20152018 increased by $190.1$387.4 million, or 11.6%16.6%, to $1,826.6$2,722.9 million as compared to $1,636.5$2,335.5 million in fiscal 2014.2017. The increase in net sales of $231.3$375.2 million, or 14.1%16.1%, was attributable to acquisition growth, resulting from the fiscal 20142017 acquisitions of PES, ConcordiaBurford, CVP Systems, Sveba Dahlen, QualServ, L2F, Globe, and U-LineScanico and the fiscal 20152018 acquisitions of Desmon, Goldstein Eswood, Marsal, Induc, Thurne, AGAHinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, Firex, Josper, Taylor, M-TEK, and Lynx.Crown. Excluding acquisitions, net sales decreased $41.2increased $12.2 million, or 2.5%0.5%, from the prior year. The impact of foreign exchange rates on foreign sales translated into U.S. Dollars for fiscal 2015 reduced2018 increased net sales by approximately $48.5$9.4 million or 3.0%0.4%. On a constant currency basis, organicThe adoption of ASC 606 increased net sales growth amountby approximately $20.6 million primarily related to 0.4%previously recognized revenue on long-term equipment sales and contracts at the Food Processing Equipment Group. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, acquisitions and the adoption of ASC 606, sales decreased 0.8% for the year, including a net sales increase of 6.3%3.1% at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, a net sales decrease of 8.3%15.7% at the Food Processing Equipment Group and a net sales decrease of 11.6%0.9% at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group.
Net sales of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group increased by $79.8$347.7 million, or 7.7%25.2%, to $1,121.0$1,729.8 million in fiscal 2015,2018 as compared to $1,041.2$1,382.1 million in fiscal 2014.2017. Net sales from the acquisitions of Concordia, Desmon, Goldstein Eswood, MarsalSveba Dahlen, QualServ, L2F, Globe, Firex, Josper, Taylor, and InducCrown which were acquired on September 8, 2014, January 7, 2015, JanuaryJune 30, 2015, February2017, August 31, 2017, October 6, 2017, October 17, 2017, April 27, 2018, May 10, 20152018, June 22, 2018, and May 30, 2015,December 3, 2018, respectively, accounted for an increase of $42.3$304.7 million during fiscal 2015.2018. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group increased $37.5$43.0 million, or 3.6%3.1%, as compared to the prior year. On a constant currency basis, organicExcluding the impact of foreign exchange and acquisitions, net sales increased 6.3%$42.9 million, or 3.1% at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Domestically, the company realized a sales increase of $59.0$207.5 million, or 8.1%21.4%, to $783.8$1,176.0 million, as compared to $724.8$968.5 million in the prior year. This includes an increase of $11.4$166.6 million from recent acquisitions. Excluding the acquisitions, the net increase of $47.6sales increased $40.9 million, or 6.6%4.2%, in domesticrelated to increased sales includes continued growth with customer initiatives to improve efficiencies in restaurant operations by adopting new cookingmajor chain restaurants and warming technologies.retail customers. International sales increased $20.8$140.2 million, or 6.6%33.9%, to $337.2$553.8 million, as compared to $316.4$413.6 million in the prior year. This includes the increase of $30.9$138.1 million from the recent acquisitions offset by $28.2and an increase of $0.1 million related to the unfavorablefavorable impact of exchange rates. The change in both domesticExcluding acquisitions and internationalforeign exchange, the net sales also includes the favorable impact of increased prices over the prior year, which is estimated to have increased netincrease in international sales by 2% to 3% as compared to the prior year.was $2.0 million, or 0.5%.
Net sales of the Food Processing Equipment Group decreasedincreased by $25.1$36.9 million, or 7.8%10.5%, to $297.7$389.6 million in fiscal 2015,2018, as compared to $322.8$352.7 million in fiscal 2014.2017. Net sales from the acquisitions of PESBurford, CVP Systems, Scanico, Hinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, and ThurneM-TEK which were acquired on March 31, 2014,May 1, 2017, June 30, 2017, December 7, 2017, February 16, 2018, April 3, 2018, and April 7, 2015,October 1, 2018, respectively, accounted for an increase of $19.2$70.5 million. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, net sales of the Food Processing Equipment Group decreased $44.3$33.6 million, or 13.7%9.5%. On a constant currency basis, organicThe adoption of ASC 606 increased net sales by approximately $20.6 million. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, acquisitions, and ASC 606 net sales decreased 8.3%$55.4 million, or 15.7% at the Food Processing Equipment Group. Domestically, the company realized a sales increase of $41.7$7.0 million, or 27.0%2.7%, to $196.4$263.7 million, as compared to $154.7$256.7 million in the prior year. This includes an increase of $18.0$33.2 million from recent acquisitions. Excluding the acquisitions, the net increase of $23.7sales decreased $26.2 million, or 15.3%10.2%. International sales decreased $66.8increased $29.9 million, or 39.7%31.1%, to $101.3$125.9 million, as compared to $168.1$96.0 million in the prior year. This includes the increase of $1.2$37.3 million from the recent acquisitions. Theacquisitions and an increase of $1.2 million related to the favorable impact of exchange rates. Excluding acquisitions and foreign exchange, the net sales decrease in international sales reflects a $17.4was $8.6 million, unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates, challenging economic conditions in certain international markets andor 9.0%. Revenues for the Food Processing Equipment Group have been affected by the timing of large orders associated with this business, impacting the growth in comparative periods. Although total net sales in this segment declined during the year, backlog increased to $108.5 million at the end of fiscal 2015 from $67.7 million at the end of fiscal 2014 as incoming orders exceeded shipments during the year due to the timingand deferral of certain large orders. Due to the nature of competitive bidding on large jobs and variability of equipment mix in comparison to the prior year, the impact of price changes are not estimated to be a significant or meaningful factor in the change in net sales from the prior year.larger projects.
Net sales of the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group increased by $135.3$2.8 million, or 49.7%0.5%, to $407.8$603.5 million in fiscal 2015,2018, as compared to $272.5$600.7 million in fiscal 2014. Net sales from the acquisitions of U-Line, AGA and Lynx which were acquired on November 5, 2014, September 23, 2015 and December 15, 2015, respectively, accounted for an increase of $169.8 million.2017. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, net sales of the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group decreased $34.5 million, or 12.7%. On a constant currency basis, organicforeign exchange, net sales decreased 11.6%$5.3 million, or 0.9% at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. Domestically, the company also realized a sales increase of $35.0$22.5 million, or 13.5%6.5%, to $294.6$366.7 million, as compared to $259.6$344.2 million in the prior year. Sales at Viking increased by approximately 15% in fiscal 2018. International sales decreased $19.7 million, or 7.7% to $236.8 million, as compared to $256.5 million in the prior year. This includes an increasea favorable impact of $66.4 million from recent acquisitions.exchange rates of $8.1 million. Excluding the acquisitions,foreign exchange, the net sales decreased $31.4decrease in international sales was $27.8 million, or 12.1%. International sales increased $100.3 million, or 777.5%10.8%, related to $113.2 million, as compared to $12.9 millionslower conditions in the prior year. This includes the increase of $103.4 million from the recent acquisitions, offset by $2.9 million related to the unfavorable impact of exchange rates. OrganicUK market. In addition, sales growth for the year was adverselydecreased at non-core businesses, acquired in connection with AGA, and have been impacted by restructuring initiatives. Restructuring initiatives at Grange, one of the announced recallnon-core businesses, was substantially completed at the end of Viking product in 2015. Additionally, sales were impacted by the discontinuation of certain non-Viking manufactured products sold by the Distributors in 2014, resulting in comparatively lower sales in 2015 and lack of product availability related to the transition and initial production startup for a new line of Viking refrigeration in the first half of 2015. The net organic decrease in sales is net of price increases, which are estimated to have added approximately 2% to net sales in comparison to the prior year.fiscal 2018.
Gross profit
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased by $65.9$91.4 million to $706.5$1,004.1 million in fiscal 20152018 from $640.6$912.7 million in fiscal 2014. The increase in the gross profit reflects2017, reflecting the impact of increased acquisition sales offset by thefrom acquisitions, adoption of ASC 606 and favorable impact of foreign exchange rates which reducedof $3.9 million. The gross profit by $13.8 million. Gross margin rate decreased from 39.1% in 20142017 to 38.7%36.9% in 2015.2018. The impact of increased selling prices net of higher input costs is not estimated to have a meaningful impact to the gross margin rate in comparison to the prior year.fiscal 2018 excluding acquisitions, adoption of ASC 606 and impact of foreign exchange was 38.4%.
Gross profit at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group increased by $28.7$106.6 million, or 6.7%19.3%, to $457.9$658.5 million in fiscal 20152018 as compared to $429.2$551.9 million in fiscal 2014. The gross margin rate declined to 40.8% as compared to 41.2% in the prior year.2017. Gross profit from the acquisitions of Concordia, Desmon, Goldstein Eswood, MarsalSveba Dahlen, QualServ, L2F, Globe, Firex, Josper, Taylor, and InducCrown accounted for approximately $15.4$80.5 million of the increase in gross profit during fiscal 2015.2018. Excluding the recent acquisitions, the gross profit increased by approximately $13.3$26.1 million on thedue to higher sales volumes.volume. The impact of foreign exchange rates increased gross profit by approximately $0.6 million. The gross profit margin rate decreased to 38.1% as compared to 39.9% in the prior year, primarily due to lower margins at recent acquisitions. The gross margin rate was slightly less than the prior year reflecting thein fiscal 2018 excluding acquisitions and impact of sales mix, including the effect of lower margins at recent acquisitions.foreign exchange was 40.5%.
Gross profit at the Food Processing Equipment Group decreased by $6.0$9.5 million, or 4.9%6.6%, to $116.1$133.6 million in fiscal 20152018 as compared to $122.1$143.1 million in fiscal 2014. The gross margin rate increased to 39.0% in fiscal 2015 as compared to 37.8% in fiscal 2014.2017. Gross profit from the acquisitions of PESBurford, CVP Systems, Scanico, Hinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, and ThurneM-TEK accounted for approximately $6.1$25.1 million of the increase in gross profit during fiscal 2015.2018. The adoption of ASC 606 increased gross profit by approximately $5.3 million. Excluding the recent acquisitions and adoption of ASC 606, the gross profit decreased by approximately $12.1$39.9 million based on lower sales volumes. However,The impact of foreign exchange rates increased gross profit by approximately $0.8 million. The gross profit margin rate decreased to 34.3% in fiscal 2018 as compared to 40.6% in the prior year, reflecting the impact of lower volumes and unfavorable product mix resulting from lesser sales of protein equipment which generally have higher margins. The gross margin rate improved as the company realized the favorablein fiscal 2018 excluding acquisitions, adoption of ASC 606, and impact of ongoing integration initiatives related to recent acquisitions.foreign exchange was 34.4%.
Gross profit at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group increaseddecreased by $40.3$5.8 million, or 44.5%2.6%, to $130.9$217.1 million in fiscal 20152018 as compared to $90.6$222.9 million in fiscal 2014. Gross profit from the acquisition2017. The impact of U-Line, AGA and Lynx accounted for approximately $53.9 million of the increase inforeign exchange rates increased gross profit during fiscal 2015. Excluding the recent acquisitions, the gross profit decreased by approximately $13.6 million on lower sales volumes offsetting price increases.$2.5 million. The gross margin rate declineddecreased to 32.1%36.0% in fiscal 20152018 as compared to 33.2%37.1% in fiscal 2014, duethe prior year, primarily related to the impact of lowerdomestic distribution changes and sales incentives for the Viking brand. The gross margins atmargin rate in fiscal 2018 excluding the recent acquisitions offsetting improved margins at Viking related to ongoing initiatives related to profitability improvement.impact of foreign exchange was 36.0%.
Selling, general and administrative expensesSELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $63.8$70.6 million to $404.0$538.8 million in fiscal 20152018 from $340.2$468.2 million in 2014.2017. As a percentage of net sales, operatingselling, general and administrative expenses amounted to 20.5%19.8% in fiscal 20152018 and 20.8%20.0% in fiscal 2014, excluding restructuring charges and the prior year gain on patent litigation settlement.2017.
Selling, general and administrative expenses reflect increased $10.8 million to $193.4 million from $182.6 million, reflecting an increasecosts of $27.8$78.3 million associated with the Concordia, U-Line, Desmon, Goldstein Eswood, Thurne, Induc, AGAfiscal 2017 acquisitions of Burford, CVP Systems, Sveba Dahlen, QualServ, L2F, Globe, and Lynx acquisitions. This increase was offset in part byScanico and the favorable impactfiscal 2018 acquisitions of $5.4 million in foreign currency translation, $10.4 million in reduced compensationHinds-Bock, Ve.Ma.C, Firex, Josper, Taylor, M-TEK, and commissions reflecting the impact of cost reduction initiatives implemented in 2014 and 2015 and $3.5 million of lower advertising expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $24.8 million to $181.8 million from $157.0 million, reflecting an increase of $30.6 million associated with the Concordia, U-Line, Desmon, Goldstein Eswood, Thurne, Induc, AGA and Lynx acquisitionsCrown, including $7.8$27.1 million of non-cash intangible amortization expenseexpense. The unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates increased selling, general and $7.3administrative expenses by approximately $3.0 million. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $3.7 million related to AGA acquisition transaction costs. The increase was offset in part by the favorable impact of $3.9lower non-cash share based compensation and $5.7 million related to lower intangible amortization expense.
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSES. Restructuring expenses decreased $0.7 million to $19.3 million from $20.0 million in foreign currency translation and
$5.7 millionthe prior year period. In fiscal 2018, restructuring charges primarily related to exiting operations of a non-core business in lower compensation costs.
Restructuring expenses increased $21.7 million to $28.8 million from $7.1 million, reflecting restructuring costs of $25.5 million at the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group, related toheadcount reductions at the integration of the Viking Distributors acquired in 2013Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group and 2014 andadditional cost reduction initiatives related to the AGA Group. Restructuring expenses during fiscal 2017 included cost reduction initiatives primarily associated withrelated to headcount reductions. Additionally, restructuring charges increased $3.3reductions at all three operating segments.
GAIN ON SALE OF PLANT. In fiscal 2017, the gain on sale of plant in the amount of $12.0 million was related to the sale of a manufacturing facility, proceeds of which were used to purchase a larger manufacturing facility to gain efficiencies in workflow and allow for future manufacturing consolidation efforts.
IMPAIRMENT OF INTANGIBLE ASSET. In fiscal 2017, the impairment of production facilities atintangible asset in the Food Processing Equipment Groupamount of $58.0 million was recognized related to the Viking tradename within the company's annual impairment assessment of goodwill and Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Inindefinite-lived assets. The impairment resulted from weaker than expected revenue performance in 2017 and a corresponding reduction in the future revenue expectations. The decline in revenues was attributable, in part, to the product recall announced in 2015 related to products manufactured prior year period, restructuring chargesto the acquisition of $7.1 million were incurred associated with the reorganization of the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group.Viking.
In the prior year, the gain on patent litigation consisted of $6.5 million of proceeds from a settlement related to a patent infringement matter.
Income from operationsINCOME FROM OPERATIONS. Income from operations increased $2.2$67.4 million to $302.6$446.0 million in fiscal 20152018 from $300.4$378.6 million in fiscal 2014.2017. Operating income as a percentage of net sales amounted to 16.4% in 2018 as compared to 16.2% in 2017. The increase in operating income resulted from the increase in net sales and gross profit, offset in partpartially by increased operating expenses. Operating income in fiscal 2017 included the gain on sale of plant and impairment of intangible assets. Excluding the impact of restructuring expenses.expenses, gain on sale of plant, and impairment of intangible assets, operating income increased $20.7 million to $465.3 million in fiscal 2018 from $444.6 million in fiscal 2017. Operating income as a percentage of net sales, excluding those items, amounted to 16.5%17.1% in 2015 as compared2018 in comparison to 18.4%19.0% in 2014. Excluding2017, reflecting the impact of restructuring expenses and gain on litigation settlement, operating income as a percentage of net sales amounted to 18.1% in 2015 in comparison to 18.4% in 2014, reflecting a slight decline from lower operating margins on recent acquisitions.
Income from operations in 20152018 included $68.8$98.3 million of non-cash expenses, including $25.5$35.8 million of depreciation expense, $27.4$60.0 million of intangible amortization related to acquisitions and $15.9$2.5 million of stock based compensation. This compares to $56.8$132.5 million of non-cash expenses in the prior year, including $15.5$29.7 million of depreciation expense, $24.6$38.6 million of intangible amortization related to acquisitions, $58.0 million related to the impairment of intangible asset and $16.7$6.2 million of stock based compensation costs.
Non-operating expensesNON-OPERATING EXPENSES. Non-operating expenses increased $1.8$27.3 million to $21.5$22.4 million of expense in fiscal 2018 from $4.9 million of income in fiscal 2017. Net interest expense and deferred financing increased $32.7 million to $58.7 million in fiscal 20152018 from $19.7$26.0 million in fiscal 2014. Net2017 reflecting higher interest expense increased $1.4 million from $15.6 million in fiscal 2014 to $17.0 million in fiscal 2015 due torates and higher debt balances related to the funding of acquisitions. Other expense was $4.5Net periodic pension benefit (other than service costs) increased $6.4 million to $38.1 million in fiscal 2015 as compared to $4.12018 from $31.7 million in fiscal 2014 primarily reflecting foreign exchange losses during the year.2017.
Income taxesINCOME TAXES. A tax provision of $89.6$106.4 million, at an effective rate of 31.9%25.1%, was recorded for fiscal 20152018 as compared to $87.5$85.4 million at an effective rate of 31.2%22.3%, in fiscal 2014. The current year effective tax rate is comprised of a 35.0% U.S. federal tax rate and 2.1% in U.S. state income taxes, 0.6% in other adjustments, net of 2.6% in U.S. domestic manufacturers deduction, 1.1% in permanent tax deductions and 2.1% in foreign rate differentials.2017. In comparison to the prior year period, the tax provision reflects a 0.7% higher effectivelower federal tax rate impact mostly relatedof 21.0% as opposed to 35.0% in 2017, partially offset by additional taxes due under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The 2017 tax provision was lower than the statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to deferred tax adjustments resulting from the tax rate reduction to 21% under the Tax Cuts and Job Act of 2017, discrete tax benefit recognized as a decrease in permanent tax benefitsresult of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Accounting" and an increase in tax reserves.the reversal of a valuation allowance.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Total cash and cash equivalents increased by $13.0$22.8 million to $68.5$94.5 million at December 31, 201628, 2019 from $55.5$71.7 million at January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. Net borrowings decreased to $732.1$1,873.1 million at December 31, 2016,28, 2019, from $766.1$1,892.1 million at January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.
Operating activitiesOPERATING ACTIVITIES. Net cash provided by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities amounted to $391.7$457.2 million as compared to $263.5$405.7 million in the prior year. Adjustments to reconcile 2016 net earnings to operating cash flows before changes in assets and liabilities included $26.2 million of depreciation and $32.0 million of amortization, $27.9 million of non-cash stock compensation expense and $21.4 million of deferred tax provision.
Net cash provided by operating activities after changes in assets and liabilities amounted to $294.1$377.4 million as compared to $249.6$368.9 million in the prior year.
During fiscal 2016,2019, net cash used to fund changes in assets and liabilities amounted to $97.6 million. These changes included a $33.9$79.7 million, increase in accounts receivable on increased sales and a $22.2 million increase in inventory related to timing of large orders for the Food Processing Equipment Group and cyclical working capital requirements for the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Additionally, there was an $11.6 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets offset by $7.7 million of cash used in the reduction of accounts payable and a $22.2 million decrease in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities primarily related to higher working capital levels. This resulted from the $14.4 million funding payment for the AGA pension plantiming of payments and funding of severance obligations associated with AGA restructuring initiatives.collections and inventory increases largely attributable to mitigating risks around order fulfillment rates managing ongoing facility consolidations efforts.
In connection with the company’s acquisition activities during the year, the company added assets and liabilities from the opening balance sheets of the acquired businesses in its consolidated balance sheets and accordingly these amounts are not reflected in the net change in working capital.
Investing activities.INVESTING ACTIVITIES. During 2016,2019, net cash used for investing activities amounted to $235.7$327.7 million. This included $208.7$281.3 million of the 20162019 acquisitions of EmicoEVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, Pacproinc, Brava and Follett, $1.9Synesso, and $46.6 million related to contingent consideration payments from previous years' acquisitions and $24.8 million ofprimarily associated with additions and upgrades of production equipment and manufacturing facilities.
Financing activities.FINANCING ACTIVITIES. Net cash flows provided byused for financing activities amounted to $41.4$25.4 million in 2016.2019. The company repaid $2.5company's borrowing activities included $17.1 million of net repayments under its $2.5$3.0 billion Credit Facility and repaid $26.8Facility. Additionally, the company used $6.1 million under foreign borrowing facilities.
The company repurchased $4.4 millionto repurchase 50,848 shares of Middleby common shares during 2016. This was comprised of $3.9 million used to repurchase 38,011 sharesstock that were surrendered to the company by employees in lieu of cash for payment for withholding taxes related to restricted stock vestings that occurred during 2016the quarter. During 2018, financing cash flows were primarily impacted by the purchase of Taylor, which resulted in approximately $1.0 billion of borrowings, as well as other acquisitions. Subsequent to the end of fiscal year December 28, 2019, the company entered into an amended and $0.5 million usedrestated credit agreement. See Note 14 to repurchase 5,274 shares of its common stock under a stock repurchase program.the consolidated financial statements for further information.
At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from operating activities and borrowings from current lenders will provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet its anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and debt amortization for the foreseeable future.
Contractual Obligations
The company's contractual cash payment obligations are set forth below (dollars in thousands):
| | | | Amounts Due Sellers From Acquisition |
| | Debt |
| | Estimated Interest on Debt |
| | Operating Leases |
| | Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
| Amounts Due Sellers From Acquisition |
| | Debt (1) |
| | Estimated Interest on Debt (1) |
| | Operating Leases |
| | Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
| Less than 1 year | $ | 5,664 |
| | $ | 5,883 |
| | $ | 20,822 |
| | $ | 24,669 |
| | $ | 57,038 |
| $ | 2,522 |
| | $ | 2,894 |
| | $ | 72,831 |
| | $ | 24,563 |
| | $ | 102,810 |
|
| 1-3 years | 3,447 |
| | 405 |
| | 40,726 |
| | 37,744 |
| | 82,322 |
| 6,720 |
| | 680 |
| | 143,234 |
| | 39,299 |
| | 189,933 |
|
| 4-5 years | 512 |
| | 725,727 |
| | 32,137 |
| | 25,961 |
| | 784,337 |
| — |
| | 164 |
| | 140,972 |
| | 22,876 |
| | 164,012 |
|
| After 5 years | — |
| | 111 |
| | 1,426 |
| | 26,342 |
| | 27,879 |
| — |
| | 1,869,402 |
| | 11,550 |
| | 25,514 |
| | 1,906,466 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,623 |
| | $ | 732,126 |
| | $ | 95,111 |
| | $ | 114,716 |
| | $ | 951,576 |
| $ | 9,242 |
| | $ | 1,873,140 |
| | $ | 368,587 |
| | $ | 112,252 |
| | $ | 2,363,221 |
|
(1) Excludes amortization of the term loan as described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
The company has obligations to make $9.6$9.2 million of estimated contingent purchase price payments to the sellers of PES, Desmon, Goldstein, Induc and Emico that were deferred in conjunction with thevarious acquisitions.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had $725.5 million1.9 billion outstanding under its revolving credit line as part of its senior credit agreement.Credit Facility. The average interest rate on this debt amounted to 2.00%3.37% at Decemberthe end of the period. On January 31, 2016.2020, the company entered into an amended and restated five-year, $3.5 billion multi-currency senior secured credit agreement. This facility replaces the company's pre-existing $3.0 billion Credit Facility, which had an original maturity of July 2021. The newly amended and restated facility (the "Amended Facility") consists of (i) a $750.0 million term loan facility and (ii) a $2.75 billion multi-currency revolving credit facility, with the potential under certain circumstances, to increase the amount of the credit facility to up to a total of $4.0 billion (plus additional amounts, subject to compliance with a senior secured net leverage ratio). The Amended Facility matures on July 28, 2021. January 31, 2025. At inception, the Amended Facility bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.625%, which is adjusted quarterly based upon the company's leverage ratio. The Amended Facility provides the availability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, to support the issuance of letters of credit and other general corporate purposes.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company also has $6.43.6 million of debt outstanding under various foreign credit facilities. The estimated interest payments reflected in the table above assume that the level of debt and average interest rate on the company’s revolving credit line under its senior credit agreementAmended Facility does not change until the facility reaches maturity in July 2021.maturity. The estimated payments also assume that relative to the company’s foreign borrowings: all scheduled term loan payments are made; the level of borrowings does not change; and the average interest rates remain at their December 31, 201628, 2019 rates. Also reflected in the table above is $10.94.9 million of payments to be madereceived related to the company’s interest rate swap agreements in 2016.2020.
The contractual maturities reflected above give effect to the Amended Facility.
As indicated in Note 1011 to the consolidated financial statements, the company’s projected benefit obligation under its defined benefit plans exceeded the plans’ assets by $323.0289.1 million at the end of 20162019 as compared to $207.5253.1 million at the end of 2015.2018. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $18.418.7 million underfunding of the company's U.S. Plans and $304.6270.4 million underfunding of the company’s Non-U.S. Plans. The company made minimum contributions required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) of $0.8$1.2 million and $0.8$0.9 million in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively, to the company’s U.S. Plans. The company expects to continue to make minimum contributions to the U.S. Plans as required by ERISA, of $1.2$1.3 million in 2017.2020. The company expects to contribute $3.5$5.8 million to the Non-U.S. Plans in 2017.2020.
The company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course of business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with a restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum purchase obligations with any supplier.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The company has no activities, obligations or exposures associated with off-balance sheet arrangements.
Related Party Transactions
From January 3, 2016December 30, 2018 through the date hereof, there were no transactions between the company, its directors and executive officers that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the company to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and any such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. At
On December 31, 2017, the company adopted the new accounting standard ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) using the modified retrospective method to contracts that were not completed as of December 30, 2017. Revenue is recognized when the control of the promised goods or services are transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and represents the unit of account in ASC 606. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The company’s contracts can have multiple performance obligations or just a single performance obligation. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation using the company’s best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract.
Within the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group and Residential Foodservice Equipment Groups, the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group, the company recognizes revenue on the saleestimated standalone selling price of its products where title transfers and when risk of loss has passed to the customer, which occurs at the time of shipment, and collectibilityequipment is reasonably assured. The sale prices of the products sold are fixed and determinable at the time of shipment. Sales are reported net of sales returns, sales incentives and cash discounts based on prior experience and other quantitative and qualitative factors.
Atobservable prices. Within the Food Processing Equipment Group, the company enters into long-term sales contracts for certain products that are often significant relativeestimates the standalone selling price based on expected cost to manufacture the good or complete the service plus an appropriate profit margin.
Control may pass to the business.customer over time or at a point in time. In general, the Commercial Foodservice Equipment and Residential Foodservice Equipment Groups recognize revenue at the point in time control transfers to their customers based on contractual shipping terms. Revenue from equipment sold under theseour long-term sales contracts within the Food Processing Equipment group is recognized over time as the equipment is manufactured and assembled. Installation services provided in connection with the delivery of the equipment are also generally recognized as those services are rendered. Over time transfer of control is measured using the percentage of completion method defined within ASC 605-35 “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” due to the length of time to fully manufacture and assemble the equipment. The company measures revenue recognized based on the ratio of actualan appropriate input measure (e.g., costs incurred or direct labor hours incurred in relation to the total estimated labor hours to be incurred related to the contract. Because estimated labor hours to complete a project areestimate). These measures include forecasts based upon forecasts usingon the best information available information, the actual hours may differ from original estimates. The percentage of completion method of accounting for these contracts most accurately reflects the status of these uncompleted contracts inand therefore reflect the company's financial statements and most accurately measuresjudgment to faithfully depict the matching of revenues with expenses. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the amounttransfer of the estimated loss is recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Revenue for sales of products and services not covered by long-term sales contracts is recognized when risk of loss has passed to the customer, which occurs at the time of shipment, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The sale prices of the products sold are fixed and determinable at the time of shipment. Sales are reported net of sales returns, sales incentives and cash discounts based on prior experience and other quantitative and qualitative factors.goods.
Inventories.Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value using the first-in, first-out method for the majority of the company’s inventories. The company evaluates the need to record valuation adjustments for inventory on a regular basis. The company’s policy is to evaluate all inventories including raw material, work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts. Inventory in excess of estimated usage requirements is written down to its estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable value are estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of potentially excess inventory.
Goodwill and OtherIndefinite-Life Intangibles.
The company’s business acquisitions result in the recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets, which are a significant portion of the company’s total assets. The company recognizes goodwill and other intangible assets under the guidance of ASC Topic 350-10, “IntangiblesIntangibles — Goodwill and Other.”Other. Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Identifiable intangible assets are recognized separately from goodwill and include trademarks and trade names, technology, customer relationships and other specifically identifiable assets. Trademarks and trade names are deemed to be indefinite-lived. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are subject to impairment testing.
On an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter, or more frequently if triggering events occur, the company comparesperforms an impairment assessment for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The company considers qualitative factors to assess if it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value toof goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is below the carrying value.
In conducting a qualitative assessment, the company analyzes a variety of events or factors that may influence the fair value of the reporting unit including, but not limited to: the results of prior quantitative assessments performed; changes in the carrying amount of the reporting unit; actual and projected revenue and operating margin; relevant market data for both the company and its peer companies; industry outlooks; macroeconomic conditions; liquidity; changes in key personnel; and the company's competitive position. Significant judgment is used to determine if a potentialevaluate the totality of these events and factors to make the determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-life intangible is less than its carrying value.
Goodwill Valuations
The reporting units at which we test goodwill for impairment exists.are our operating segments. These consist of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, the Food Processing Equipment Group and the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. If the fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss, if any, is recorded for the difference between the implied fair value and the carrying value of goodwill.
In performing a quantitative assessment, if required, we estimate each reporting unit's fair value under an income approach using a discounted cash flow model. The income approach uses each reporting unit's projection of estimated operating results and cash flows that are discounted using a market participant discount rate based on a weighted-average cost of capital. The financial projections reflect management's best estimate of economic and market conditions over the projected period including forecasted revenue growth, operating margins, tax rate, capital expenditures, depreciation, amortization and changes in working capital requirements. Other assumptions include discount rate and terminal growth rate. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit is compared to their respective carrying values. Additionally, we validate our estimates of fair value under the income approach by comparing the fair value estimate using a market approach. A market approach estimates fair value by applying cash flow multiples to the reporting unit's operating performance. The multiples are derived from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics of the reporting units. We consider the implied control premium and conclude whether it is reasonable based on other recent market transactions.
We performed a qualitative assessment as of September 29, 2019 over all three reporting units and determined it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units are greater than the carrying amounts.
In estimating the fair value of specific intangible assets,our reporting units, management relies on a number of factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, comparable transactions and other market data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in applying them in the impairment tests of goodwill. If actual results are not consistent with management's estimate and assumptions, a material impairment could have an adverse effect on the company's financial condition and results of operations.
Indefinite-Life Intangible Valuations
In performing a quantitative assessment of indefinite-life intangible assets other than goodwill, primarily trademarks and trade names, we estimate the fair value of these intangible assets using the relief-from-royalty method which requires assumptions related to projected revenues from our long-range plans; assumed royalty rates that could be payable if we did not own the trademark; and a discount rate using a market based weighted-average cost of capital. If the estimated fair value of the indefinite-life intangible asset is less than its carrying value, we would recognize an impairment loss.
Based on the qualitative assessment as of September 29, 2019, the company identified several trademarks and trade names with indicators of potential risk for impairment and performed quantitative assessment. In performing the quantitative analysis on these trademark assets, significant assumptions used in our relief-from-royalty model included revenue growth rates, assumed royalty rates and the discount rate, which are discussed further below.
Revenue growth rates relate to projected revenues from our long-range plans and vary from brand to brand. Adverse changes in the operating environment or our inability to grow revenues at the forecasted rates may result in a material impairment charge.
In determining royalty rates for the valuation of our trademarks, we considered factors that affect the assumed royalty rates that would hypothetically be paid for the use of the trademarks. The most significant factors in determining the assumed royalty rates include the overall role and importance of the trademarks in the particular industry, the profitability of the products utilizing the trademarks, and the position of the trademarked products in the given market segment.
In developing discount rates for the valuation of our trademarks, we used the market based weighted average cost of capital, adjusted for higher relative level of risks associated with doing business in other countries, as applicable, as well as the higher relative levels of risks associated with intangible assets.
As a result of quantitative testing the company determined there were no impairments of trademarks. The gross value of the trademarks tested was approximately $75.0 million. The fair values of the trademarks tested exceeded their carrying values by more than 10%. The company believes the assumptions utilized within the quantitative analysis are reasonable.
We performed a qualitative assessment as of September 29, 2019 over all the other trademarks and trade names and determined it is more likely than not that the fair value of our other indefinite-life intangible assets are greater than the carrying amounts.
If actual results are not consistent with management's estimate and assumptions, a material impairment charge of our trademarks and trade names could occur, which could have an adverse effect on the company's financial condition and results of operations.
Pension Benefits.Benefits
The company provides pension benefits to certain employees and accounts for these benefits in accordance with ASC 715, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits"Compensation-Retirement Benefits. For financial reporting purposes, long-term assumptions are developed through consultations with actuaries. Such assumptions include the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and discount rates.
The amount of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses recognized in the current year’s operations is based on amortizing the unrecognized gains or losses for each plan that exceed the larger of 10% of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets, also known as the corridor. The amount of unrecognized gain or loss that exceeds the corridor is amortized over the average future service of the plan participants or the average life expectancy of inactive plan participants for plans where all or almost all of the plan participants are inactive. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our pension obligations and our future expense.
Income taxes.
The company provides deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial and tax bases of assets and liabilities based on currently enacted tax laws. The company’s deferred and other tax balances are based on management’s interpretation of the tax regulations and rulings in numerous taxing jurisdictions. Income tax expense and liabilities recognized by the company also reflect its best estimates and assumptions regarding, among other things, the level of future taxable income, the effect of the company’s various tax planning strategies and uncertain tax positions. Future tax authority rulings and changes in tax laws, changes in projected levels of taxable income and future tax planning strategies could affect the actual effective tax rate and tax balances recorded by the company. The company follows the provisions under ASC 740-10-25 that provides a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition of a tax benefit taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Tax benefits are recognized only when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the benefits will be sustained on examination. Tax benefits that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured using a probability weighting of the largest amount of tax benefit that has greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a particular tax benefit is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances evaluated in light of all available evidence as of the balance sheet date.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014,See Note 3(r) to the Consolidated Financial Accounts Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This update amends the current guidanceStatements for further information on revenue recognition related to contracts with customers. Under ASU No. 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. In 2016, the FASB issued additional updates: ASU No. 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12 and 2016-20. These updates provide further guidance and clarification on specific items within the previously issued update. In July 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date of the new revenue standard to be effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017 for public companies. Companies may elect to adopt the standard at the original effective date which, for the company is, for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, but not earlier. The guidance can be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. The company will adopt this standard, as required, for fiscal year 2018 and expects to use the modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect, if any, recognized in the opening balance of retained earnings. The company is continuing to evaluate the impact the application of these ASU's will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.accounting pronouncements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation - Stock Compensation”. This update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update is effective for annual and corresponding interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items". This update eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from the current guidance. This update is effective for annual and corresponding interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires debt issuance costs to be recorded as a direct reduction of the debt liability on the balance sheet rather than as an asset. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The new guidance was applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, "Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer's Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets". This ASU is intended to provide a practical expedient for the measurement date of defined benefit plan assets and obligations. The practical expedient allows employers with fiscal year-end dates that do not fall on a calendar month-end (e.g., companies with a 52/53-week fiscal year) to measure pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets and obligations as of the calendar month-end date closest to the fiscal year-end. The FASB also provided a similar practical expedient for interim remeasurements for significant events. This ASU requires perspective application and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which is intended to simplify the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the current lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The guidance applies only to inventories for which cost is determined by methods other than last-in, first-out and the retail inventory method. Application of the standard, which should be applied prospectively, is required for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Interest - Imputation of Interest” which relates to the presentation of debt issuance costs. This standard clarifies the guidance set forth in FASB ASU 2015-03, which required that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset. The new pronouncement clarifies that debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements could continue to be presented as an asset and be subsequently amortized over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. The adoption of this guidance by the company did not result in a material reclassification of debt issuance costs.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”, which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, acquirers must recognize measurement-period adjustments during the period in which they determine the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts they would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes". The amendments in ASU 2015-17 simplify the accounting for, and presentation of, deferred taxes by eliminating the need to separately classify the current amount of deferred tax assets or liabilities. Instead, aggregated deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified and reported as non-current assets or liabilities. The update is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The company early adopted ASU 2015-17 effective April 3, 2016 on a prospective basis. Adoption of this ASU resulted in a reclassification of the company's net current deferred tax asset to the net non-current deferred tax liability in the company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 2, 2016. No prior periods were retrospectively adjusted.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)". The amendments under this pronouncement will change the way all leases with a duration of one year of more are treated. Under this guidance, lessees will be required to capitalize virtually all leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and an associated financing lease liability or capital lease liability. The right-of-use asset represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the specified lease term. The lease liability represents the lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease, measured on a discounted basis. Based on certain characteristics, leases are classified as financing leases or operating leases. Financing lease liabilities, those that contain provisions similar to capitalized leases, are amortized like capital leases are under current accounting, as amortization expense and interest expense in the statement of operations. Operating lease liabilities are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease as lease expense in the statement of operations. This update is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. The company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its policies and procedures pertaining to its existing and future lease arrangements, disclosure requirements and on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-05, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships". The amendments in ASU 2016-05 clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under Topic 815 does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of the hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The amendments in this update may be applied on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)". The amendments in ASU-09 simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however the company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to be material.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments". The amendments in ASU-15 address eight specific cash flow classification issues to reduce current and potential future diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's cash flows.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory". The amendments in ASU-16 prohibit the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer other than inventory until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business". The amendments in ASU-01 clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December15, 2017. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU. The company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". The amendments in ASU-04 simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, by removing the second step of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value. The new guidance does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for testing dates after January 1, 2017. The company is evaluating the application of this ASU on the company's annual impairment test. The company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Certain Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results
An investment in shares of the company's common stock involves risks. The company believes the risks and uncertainties described in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and in "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" are the material risks it faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the company or that it currently deems immaterial may impair its business operations. If any of the risks identified in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" actually occurs, the company's business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected, and the trading price of the company's common stock could decline.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
The company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The following table summarizes the maturity of the company's debt obligations:obligations, and considers the company’s entering into an amended and restated five-year, $3.5 billion multi-currency senior secured credit agreement described below:
|
| | | |
| | Variable Rate Debt |
| | |
| 2017 | $ | 5,883 |
|
| 2018 | 292 |
|
| 2019 | 113 |
|
| 2020 | 113 |
|
| 2020 and thereafter | 725,725 |
|
| | $ | 732,126 |
|
|
| | | |
| | Variable Rate Debt |
| | |
| 2020 | $ | 2,894 |
|
| 2021 | 378 |
|
| 2022 | 302 |
|
| 2023 | 82 |
|
| 2024 and thereafter | 1,869,484 |
|
| | $ | 1,873,140 |
|
On July 28, 2016, the company entered into an amended and restated five-year $2.5 billion multi-currency senior secured revolving credit agreement (the "Credit Facility"), with. On December 18, 2018, the potential under certain circumstancescompany entered into an amendment to increase the amount of the Credit Facility, increasing the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility by $500.0 million to a total of $3.0 billion. Subsequent to the end of fiscal year December 28, 2019, the company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement. See Note 14 to the consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Amended Facility. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had $725.5 million1.9 billion of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, including $701.0 million$1.8 billion of borrowings in U.S. Dollars and $24.5$47.9 million of borrowings denominated in British Pounds.Euros. The company also has $10.213.3 million in outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, which reduces the borrowing availability under the Credit Facility. Remaining borrowing availability under this facilitythe Credit Facility was $1.81.1 billion at December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, borrowings under the Credit Facility accrued interest at a rate of 1.25%1.625% above LIBOR per annum or 0.25%0.625% above the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and one month LIBOR plus 1.00%. The average interest rate per annum on the debt under the Credit Facility was equal to 2.00% for3.37% at the end of the period. The interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s funded debtless unrestricted cashFunded Debt Less Unrestricted Cash to pro formaPro Forma EBITDA (the "Leverage Ratio") on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment fee based upon the Leverage Ratio is charged on the unused portion of the commitments under the Credit Facility. This variable commitment fee was equal to 0.20%0.25% per annum as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
In addition, the company has other international credit facilities to fund working capital needs outside the United States and the United Kingdom. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, these foreign credit facilities amounted to $6.4$3.6 million in U.S. Dollars with a weighted average per annum interest rate of approximately 10.21%5.18%.
The company uses floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements to hedge variable interest rate risk associated with the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had outstanding floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps totaling $135.0$51.0 million notional amount carrying an average interest rate of 0.91%1.27% maturing in less than 12 months and $324.0$897.0 million of notional amount carrying an average interest rate of 1.30%2.27% that mature in more than 12 months but less than 8472 months.
The senior revolving facilityAmended Facility matures on July 28, 2021,January 31, 2025, and accordingly has been classified as a long-term liability on the consolidated balance sheet.
The terms of the CreditAmended Facility limit the ability of the company and its subsidiaries to, with certain exceptions: incur indebtedness; grant liens; engage in certain mergers, consolidations, acquisitions and dispositions; make restricted payments; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and requires, among other things, the company to satisfy certain financial covenants: (i) a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the CreditAmended Facility) of 3.00 to 1.00 and (ii) a maximum Leverage Ratio of Funded DebtlessDebt less Unrestricted Cash to Pro Forma EBITDA (each as defined in the CreditAmended Facility) of 3.504.00 to 1.00, which may be adjusted to 4.004.50 to 1.00 for a four consecutive fiscal quarter period in connection with certain qualified acquisitions, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the CreditAmended Facility. The CreditAmended Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of Middleby Marshall, the company and the company's domestic subsidiaries and is unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, the company and certain of the company's direct and indirect material foreign and domestic subsidiaries. The CreditAmended Facility contains certain customary events of default, including, but not limited to, the failure to make required payments; bankruptcy and other insolvency events; the failure to perform certain covenants; the material breach of a representation or warranty; non-payment of certain other indebtedness; the entry of undischarged judgments against the company or any subsidiary for the payment of material uninsured amounts; the invalidity of the company guarantee or any subsidiary guaranty; and a change of control of the company. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing agreements.
Financing Derivative Instruments
The company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and all changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the fair value of these instruments was an asseta liability of $8.7$23.3 million. The change in fair value of these swap agreements in fiscal 20162019 was a gainloss of $5.4$24.1 million, net of taxes. The potential net loss on fair value for such instruments from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in quoted interest rates would not have a material impact on the company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Foreign Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments
The company uses derivative financial instruments, principally foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms of less than one year, to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade receivables and payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. The potential loss on fair value for such instruments from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in quoted foreign exchange rates would not have a material impact on the company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The company accounts for its derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815, "DerivativesDerivatives and Hedging."Hedging. In accordance with ASC 815, these instruments are recognized on the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at fair value. Changes in the market value and the related foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in the statement of earnings.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
| |
| | Page |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| The following consolidated financial statement schedule is included in response to Item 15 | |
| | |
| |
All other schedules for which provision is made to applicable regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instruction or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Middleby Corporation and Subsidiaries
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited theThe Middleby Corporation and subsidiariesCorporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)Framework), (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The Middleby Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and subsidiaries'conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of EVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, Pacproinc, Brava and Synesso which are included in the 2019 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 6.4% and (0.3%) of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 28, 2019 and 3.6% and (1.7%) of revenues and net income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of EVO, Cooking Solutions Group, Powerhouse, Ss Brewtech, Pacproinc, Brava and Synesso.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Companyas of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 8 and our report dated February 26, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Form 10-K.Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 26, 2020
As indicated in
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Company's accompanying “Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”, management's assessmentShareholders and the Board of and conclusionDirectors of The Middleby Corporation
Opinion on the effectivenessFinancial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Follett Corporation which are included in the 2016 consolidated financial statements of theThe Middleby Corporation and subsidiaries and constituted 7.7%of total assets and 16.4% of net assets, respectively,(the Company) as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019 and 4.5%December 29, 2018, the related consolidated statements of net salesearnings, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and 3.7% of net earnings, respectively,cash flows for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reportingeach of the Middleby Corporationthree years in the period ended December 28, 2019, and subsidiaries also did not include an evaluation of the internal control overrelated notes and financial reporting of Follett Corporation.
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 8, (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the Middleby Corporation and subsidiaries maintained,consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, effective internal control overthe consolidated financial reporting asposition of the Company at December 31, 2016, based on28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, and the COSO criteria.consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Middleby Corporation and subsidiariesCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, and28, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the related consolidated statementsCommittee of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for eachSponsoring Organizations of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 of the Middleby Corporation and subsidiariesTreadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated March 1, 2017February 26, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLPBasis for Opinion
Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 2017
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Middleby Corporation and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Middleby Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also include the financial statement schedule listed in Item 8. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion,
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Middleby Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, inany way our opinion on the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basicconsolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respectsand we are not, by communicating the information set forth therein.critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Middleby Corporation and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 1, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. |
| |
| Acquisition of Taylor Company |
| Description of the Matter | As described in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed its acquisition of Taylor Company for net consideration of approximately $1.0 billion on June 22, 2018. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination.
Auditing the Company's accounting for its acquisition of Taylor Company was complex due to the significant estimation uncertainty in determining the fair value of identified intangible assets of approximately $604 million, which principally consisted of the Taylor trade name and customer relationships. The significant estimation uncertainty was primarily due to the sensitivity of the respective fair values to underlying assumptions about the future performance of the acquired business. The Company used a discounted cash flow model to measure the trade name and customer relationship intangible assets. The significant assumptions used to estimate the value of the intangible assets include revenue growth rates, projected profit margins, discount rates, royalty rates, and customer attrition rates. These significant assumptions are forward-looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions. |
| |
|
| |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company's controls over accounting for the acquisition of Taylor Company, including controls over the determination of the fair value of the acquired trade name and customer relationships intangible assets, and management's evaluation of the underlying assumptions described above. We also tested management's controls over the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the valuation models.
To test the estimated fair value of the trade name and customer relationships intangible assets, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the Company's selection of the valuation methodology, evaluating the methods and significant assumptions used by the Company's valuation specialist, and evaluating the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the significant assumptions and estimates. We compared the assumptions related to the revenue growth rate and projected profit margin, to the past performance of Taylor Company, the Company's history related to similar acquisitions, and third party industry data. We tested the assumptions related to discount rates and royalty rates to the Company’s history related to similar acquisitions and third-party industry data. We involved a valuation specialist to assist with our evaluation of the methodologies used by the Company and significant assumptions included in the fair value estimates. |
| |
| Impairment tests of indefinite-lived intangible assets |
| Description of the Matter | At December 28, 2019, the Company's indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of 69 trademarks and tradenames with an aggregate carrying value of approximately $997 million and represented 19.9% of total assets. As described in Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements, trademarks and tradenames with indefinite lives are tested by the Company’s management for impairment at least annually, in the fiscal fourth quarter, unless there are indications of impairment at other points throughout the year. If the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference.
Auditing the impairment tests of indefinite-lived intangible assets is complex due to the significant management judgments and estimates required to determine the fair value of the trademarks and tradenames, including assumptions as to forecasted net sales, discount rates and royalty rates, all of which are sensitive to and affected by economic, industry and company-specific qualitative factors. |
| |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company's controls over the impairment tests of indefinite-lived intangible assets. This included evaluating controls over the Company’s process used to develop the forecasts of future net sales and the selection of royalty rates and discount rates used in estimating the fair value of the trademarks and tradenames with indefinite lives. We also tested controls over management’s review of the completeness and accuracy of data used in their valuation models.
To test the estimated fair value of the Company’s trademarks and tradenames, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies, testing the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, the Company’s historical results and other guideline companies within the same industry and evaluated whether changes in the Company’s business would affect the significant assumptions. We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates by comparing them to actual operating results and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the change in the fair value of the trademarks and tradenames with indefinite lives resulting from changes in these assumptions. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in reviewing the valuation methodology and testing the discount rates and royalty rates. |
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2012.
Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 2017February 26, 2020
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 201628, 2019 AND JANUARY 2, 2016DECEMBER 29, 2018
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
| | | | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
| ASSETS | |
| | |
| |
| | |
|
| Current assets: | |
| | |
| |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 68,485 |
| | $ | 55,528 |
| $ | 94,500 |
| | $ | 71,701 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 325,868 |
| | 282,534 |
| |
| Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $14,886 and $13,608 | | 447,612 |
| | 398,660 |
|
| Inventories, net | 368,243 |
| | 354,150 |
| 585,699 |
| | 521,810 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other | 42,704 |
| | 39,801 |
| 61,224 |
| | 50,940 |
|
| Prepaid taxes | 6,399 |
| | 11,426 |
| 20,161 |
| | 18,483 |
|
| Deferred taxes | — |
| | 51,723 |
| |
| Total current assets | 811,699 |
| | 795,162 |
| 1,209,196 |
| | 1,061,594 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 221,571 |
| | 199,750 |
| |
| Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $197,629 and $167,737 | | 352,145 |
| | 314,569 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,092,722 |
| | 983,339 |
| 1,849,747 |
| | 1,743,175 |
|
| Other intangibles, net | 696,171 |
| | 749,430 |
| |
| Other intangibles, net of amortization of $333,507 and $268,414 | | 1,443,381 |
| | 1,361,024 |
|
| Long-term deferred tax assets | 51,699 |
| | 11,438 |
| 36,932 |
| | 32,188 |
|
| Other assets | 43,274 |
| | 22,032 |
| 110,742 |
| | 37,231 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 2,917,136 |
| | $ | 2,761,151 |
| $ | 5,002,143 |
| | $ | 4,549,781 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |
| | |
| |
| | |
|
| Current liabilities: | |
| | |
| |
| | |
|
| Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 5,883 |
| | $ | 32,059 |
| $ | 2,894 |
| | $ | 3,207 |
|
| Accounts payable | 146,921 |
| | 157,758 |
| 173,693 |
| | 188,299 |
|
| Accrued expenses | 335,605 |
| | 320,228 |
| 416,550 |
| | 367,446 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 488,409 |
| | 510,045 |
| 593,137 |
| | 558,952 |
|
| Long-term debt | 726,243 |
| | 734,002 |
| 1,870,246 |
| | 1,888,898 |
|
| Long-term deferred tax liability | 77,760 |
| | 113,010 |
| 133,500 |
| | 113,896 |
|
| Accrued pension benefits | 322,988 |
| | 207,490 |
| 289,086 |
| | 253,119 |
|
| Other non-current liabilities | 36,418 |
| | 29,774 |
| 169,360 |
| | 69,713 |
|
| Stockholders' equity: | |
| | |
| |
| | |
|
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; none issued | — |
| | — |
| |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 62,445,315 and 62,168,346 shares issued in 2016 and 2015, respectively | 144 |
| | 144 |
| |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $0.01 par value; 63,129,775 and 62,592,707 shares issued in 2019 and 2018, respectively | | 145 |
| | 145 |
|
| Paid-in capital | 355,287 |
| | 328,686 |
| 387,402 |
| | 377,419 |
|
| Treasury stock at cost; 4,905,549 and 4,862,264 shares in 2016 and 2015, respectively | (205,280 | ) | | (200,862 | ) | |
| Treasury stock, at cost; 6,940,089 and 6,889,241 shares in 2019 and 2018 | | (451,262 | ) | | (445,118 | ) |
| Retained earnings | 1,399,490 |
| | 1,115,274 |
| 2,361,462 |
| | 2,009,233 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (284,323 | ) | | (76,412 | ) | (350,933 | ) | | (276,476 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
| Total stockholders' equity | 1,265,318 |
| | 1,166,830 |
| 1,946,814 |
| | 1,665,203 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 2,917,136 |
| | $ | 2,761,151 |
| $ | 5,002,143 |
| | $ | 4,549,781 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, JANUARY 2, 201628, 2019, DECEMBER 29, 2018
AND JANUARY 3, 2015DECEMBER 30, 2017
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
| | | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net sales | $ | 2,267,852 |
| | $ | 1,826,598 |
| | $ | 1,636,538 |
| $ | 2,959,446 |
| | $ | 2,722,931 |
| | $ | 2,335,542 |
|
| Cost of sales | 1,366,672 |
| | 1,120,093 |
| | 995,953 |
| 1,855,949 |
| | 1,718,791 |
| | 1,422,801 |
|
| Gross profit | 901,180 |
| | 706,505 |
| | 640,585 |
| 1,103,497 |
| | 1,004,140 |
| | 912,741 |
|
| Selling and distribution expenses | 223,883 |
| | 193,353 |
| | 182,578 |
| |
| General and administrative expenses | 220,548 |
| | 181,795 |
| | 157,016 |
| |
| Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 593,813 |
| | 538,842 |
| | 468,219 |
|
| Restructuring expenses | 10,524 |
| | 28,754 |
| | 7,078 |
| 10,480 |
| | 19,332 |
| | 19,951 |
|
| Gain on litigation settlement | — |
| | — |
| | (6,519 | ) | (14,839 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Gain on sale of plant | | — |
| | — |
| | (12,042 | ) |
| Impairment of intangible asset | | — |
| | — |
| | 58,000 |
|
| Income from operations | 446,225 |
| | 302,603 |
| | 300,432 |
| 514,043 |
| | 445,966 |
| | 378,613 |
|
| Interest expense and deferred financing amortization, net | 23,880 |
| | 16,967 |
| | 15,592 |
| 82,609 |
| | 58,742 |
| | 25,983 |
|
| Other expense, net | 1,040 |
| | 4,469 |
| | 4,050 |
| |
| Net periodic pension benefit (other than service costs) | | (28,857 | ) | | (38,114 | ) | | (31,728 | ) |
| Other (income) expense, net | | (2,328 | ) | | 1,825 |
| | 829 |
|
| Earnings before income taxes | 421,305 |
| | 281,167 |
| | 280,790 |
| 462,619 |
| | 423,513 |
| | 383,529 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | 137,089 |
| | 89,557 |
| | 87,478 |
| 110,379 |
| | 106,361 |
| | 85,401 |
|
| Net earnings | $ | 284,216 |
| | $ | 191,610 |
| | $ | 193,312 |
| $ | 352,240 |
| | $ | 317,152 |
| | $ | 298,128 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
| | $ | 3.41 |
| $ | 6.33 |
| | $ | 5.71 |
| | $ | 5.26 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
| | $ | 3.40 |
| $ | 6.33 |
| | $ | 5.70 |
| | $ | 5.26 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average number of shares | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | 57,030 |
| | 56,951 |
| | 56,764 |
| 55,647 |
| | 55,576 |
| | 56,715 |
|
| Dilutive common stock equivalents | 55 |
| | 22 |
| | 20 |
| 9 |
| | 28 |
| | 4 |
|
| Diluted | 57,085 |
| | 56,973 |
| | 56,784 |
| 55,656 |
| | 55,604 |
| | 56,719 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, JANUARY 2, 201628, 2019, DECEMBER 29, 2018
AND JANUARY 3, 2015DECEMBER 30, 2017
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net earnings | $ | 284,216 |
| | $ | 191,610 |
| | $ | 193,312 |
| $ | 352,240 |
| | $ | 317,152 |
| | $ | 298,128 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (63,569 | ) | | (28,187 | ) | | (18,770 | ) | 7,066 |
| | (43,050 | ) | | 46,690 |
|
| Pension liability adjustment, net of tax | (149,815 | ) | | (17,039 | ) | | (4,420 | ) | (57,398 | ) | | 32,125 |
| | (29,669 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax | 5,473 |
| | 245 |
| | 394 |
| |
| Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax | | (24,125 | ) | | 868 |
| | 883 |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | $ | (74,457 | ) | | $ | (10,057 | ) | | $ | 17,904 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Comprehensive income | $ | 76,305 |
| | $ | 146,629 |
| | $ | 170,516 |
| $ | 277,783 |
| | $ | 307,095 |
| | $ | 316,032 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, JANUARY 2, 201628, 2019, DECEMBER 29, 2018
AND JANUARY 3, 2015DECEMBER 30, 2017
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | Common Stock |
| | Paid-in Capital |
| | Treasury Stock |
| | Retained Earnings |
| | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(loss) |
| | Total Stockholders' Equity |
| Common Stock |
| | Paid-in Capital |
| | Treasury Stock |
| | Retained Earnings |
| | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(loss) |
| | Total Stockholders' Equity |
|
| Balance, December 28, 2013 | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 268,229 |
| | $ | (151,743 | ) | | $ | 730,352 |
| | $ | (8,635 | ) | | $ | 838,347 |
| |
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 355,287 |
| | $ | (205,280 | ) | | $ | 1,399,490 |
| | $ | (284,323 | ) | | $ | 1,265,318 |
|
| Net earnings | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 193,312 |
| | — |
| | 193,312 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 298,128 |
| | — |
| | 298,128 |
|
| Currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (18,770 | ) | | (18,770 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,690 |
| | 46,690 |
|
| Change in unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of $3,302 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,420 | ) | | (4,420 | ) | |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax of $545 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 394 |
| | 394 |
| |
| Change in unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of $(5,588) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (29,669 | ) | | (29,669 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax of $588 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 883 |
| | 883 |
|
| Stock compensation | — |
| | 16,690 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,690 |
| — |
| | 6,237 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,237 |
|
| Tax benefit on stock compensation | — |
| | 25,490 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25,490 |
| |
| Stock issuance | | 1 |
| | 13,398 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,399 |
|
| Purchase of treasury stock | — |
| | — |
| | (44,283 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (44,283 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (239,838 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (239,838 | ) |
| Balance, January 3, 2015 | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 310,409 |
| | $ | (196,026 | ) | | $ | 923,664 |
| | $ | (31,431 | ) | | $ | 1,006,760 |
| |
| Balance, December 30, 2017 | | $ | 145 |
| | $ | 374,922 |
| | $ | (445,118 | ) | | $ | 1,697,618 |
| | $ | (266,419 | ) | | $ | 1,361,148 |
|
| Net earnings | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 191,610 |
| | — |
| | 191,610 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 317,152 |
| | — |
| | 317,152 |
|
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 (1) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,132 | ) | | 1,132 |
| | — |
|
Adoption of ASU 2014-09 (2) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,405 | ) | | — |
| | (4,405 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (28,187 | ) | | (28,187 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (43,050 | ) | | (43,050 | ) |
| Change in unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of $(3,740) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (17,039 | ) | | (17,039 | ) | |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax of $163 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 245 |
| | 245 |
| |
| Change in unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of $6,386 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32,612 |
| | 32,612 |
|
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax of $(81) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (751 | ) | | (751 | ) |
| Stock compensation | — |
| | 15,863 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,863 |
| — |
| | 2,497 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,497 |
|
| Tax benefit on stock compensation | — |
| | 2,414 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,414 |
| |
| Balance, December 29, 2018 | | $ | 145 |
| | $ | 377,419 |
| | $ | (445,118 | ) | | $ | 2,009,233 |
| | $ | (276,476 | ) | | $ | 1,665,203 |
|
| Net earnings | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 352,240 |
| | — |
| | 352,240 |
|
Adoption of ASU 2017-12 (3) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | 11 |
| | — |
|
| Currency translation adjustments | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,066 |
| | 7,066 |
|
| Change in unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of $(11,914) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (57,398 | ) | | (57,398 | ) |
| Unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of tax of $(8,516) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (24,136 | ) | | (24,136 | ) |
| Stock compensation | | — |
| | 8,133 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,133 |
|
| Stock issuance | | — |
| | 1,850 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,850 |
|
| Purchase of treasury stock | — |
| | — |
| | (4,836 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,836 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (6,144 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (6,144 | ) |
| Balance, January 2, 2016 | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 328,686 |
| | $ | (200,862 | ) | | $ | 1,115,274 |
| | $ | (76,412 | ) | | $ | 1,166,830 |
| |
| Net earnings | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 284,216 |
| | — |
| | 284,216 |
| |
| Currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (63,569 | ) | | (63,569 | ) | |
| Change in unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of $(30,717) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (149,815 | ) | | (149,815 | ) | |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax of $3,649 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,473 |
| | 5,473 |
| |
| Stock compensation | — |
| | 27,905 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 27,905 |
| |
| Tax benefit on stock compensation | — |
| | (1,304 | ) | |
|
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,304 | ) | |
| Purchase of treasury stock | — |
| | — |
| | (4,418 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,418 | ) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 355,287 |
| | $ | (205,280 | ) | | $ | 1,399,490 |
| | $ | (284,323 | ) | | $ | 1,265,318 |
| |
| Balance, December 28, 2019 | | $ | 145 |
| | $ | 387,402 |
| | $ | (451,262 | ) | | $ | 2,361,462 |
| | $ | (350,933 | ) | | $ | 1,946,814 |
|
(1) As of December 31, 2017, the company adopted ASU No. 2018-02,Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the reclassification of $1.1 million, including $1.6 million related to interest rate swap and $(0.5) million related to pensions, of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
(2) As of December 31, 2017, the company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) using the modified retrospective method to contracts that were not completed as of December 30, 2017. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the recognition of $(4.4) million as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.
(3) As of December 30, 2018, the company adopted ASU No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the recognition of less than $(0.1) million as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, JANUARY 2, 201628, 2019, DECEMBER 29, 2018
AND JANUARY 3, 2015DECEMBER 30, 2017
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Cash flows from operating activities— | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net earnings | $ | 284,216 |
| | $ | 191,610 |
| | $ | 193,312 |
| $ | 352,240 |
| | $ | 317,152 |
| | $ | 298,128 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | | |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 58,234 |
| | 54,074 |
| | 41,252 |
| 103,428 |
| | 97,238 |
| | 69,774 |
|
| Non-cash share-based compensation | 27,905 |
| | 15,864 |
| | 16,690 |
| 8,133 |
| | 2,497 |
| | 6,237 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 21,363 |
| | 1,919 |
| | 15,341 |
| 22,212 |
| | 20,489 |
| | (14,492 | ) |
| Net periodic pension benefit (other than service costs) | | (28,857 | ) | | (38,114 | ) | | (31,728 | ) |
| Gain on sale of plant | | — |
| | — |
| | (12,042 | ) |
| Impairment of equipment | | — |
| | 783 |
| | 3,114 |
|
| Impairment of intangible asset | | — |
| | — |
| | 58,000 |
|
| Non-cash restructuring | | — |
| | 5,637 |
| | — |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions | | | | | |
| | | | | |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | (33,908 | ) | | 17,112 |
| | (20,577 | ) | (27,748 | ) | | (25,347 | ) | | 26,180 |
|
| Inventories, net | (22,246 | ) | | 7,826 |
| | (2,064 | ) | (28,288 | ) | | (28,378 | ) | | (9,744 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | (11,550 | ) | | (5,685 | ) | | (384 | ) | 5,067 |
| | 18,145 |
| | (34,122 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (7,730 | ) | | (18,036 | ) | | (7,872 | ) | (29,396 | ) | | 13,611 |
| | (21,631 | ) |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (22,174 | ) | | (15,092 | ) | | (1,816 | ) | 634 |
| | (14,799 | ) | | (33,219 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 294,110 |
| | 249,592 |
| | 233,882 |
| 377,425 |
| | 368,914 |
| | 304,455 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities— | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Additions to property and equipment | (24,817 | ) | | (22,362 | ) | | (13,143 | ) | (46,609 | ) | | (36,040 | ) | | (54,493 | ) |
| Proceeds on sale of plant | | — |
| | — |
| | 14,278 |
|
| Purchase of tradename | | — |
| | (5,399 | ) | | — |
|
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (210,921 | ) | | (348,625 | ) | | (219,915 | ) | (281,058 | ) | | (1,197,984 | ) | | (305,251 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (235,738 | ) | | (370,987 | ) | | (233,058 | ) | (327,667 | ) | | (1,239,423 | ) | | (345,466 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities— | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net (repayments) proceeds under revolving credit facilities | (2,482 | ) | | 145,500 |
| | 18,900 |
| |
| Net (repayments) proceeds under foreign bank loan | (26,821 | ) | | (6,058 | ) | | 8,815 |
| |
| Net (repayments) under other debt arrangement | (35 | ) | | (262 | ) | | (35 | ) | |
| Proceeds under Credit Facility | | 543,294 |
| | 1,611,110 |
| | 758,883 |
|
| Repayments under Credit Facility | | (560,363 | ) | | (746,281 | ) | | (462,112 | ) |
| Net repayments under foreign bank loan | | (405 | ) | | (7,088 | ) | | (1,062 | ) |
| Net repayments under other debt arrangement | | (179 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (35 | ) |
| Payments of deferred purchase price | | (1,648 | ) | | (1,234 | ) | | — |
|
| Repurchase of treasury stock | (4,418 | ) | | (4,836 | ) | | (44,283 | ) | (6,144 | ) | | — |
| | (239,838 | ) |
| Debt issuance costs | (6,310 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | (375 | ) | | — |
|
| Excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation | (1,304 | ) | | 2,414 |
| | 25,490 |
| |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (41,370 | ) | | 136,758 |
| | 8,887 |
| (25,445 | ) | | 856,129 |
| | 55,836 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (4,045 | ) | | (3,780 | ) | | (2,660 | ) | (1,514 | ) | | (3,573 | ) | | 6,344 |
|
| Changes in cash and cash equivalents— | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 12,957 |
| | 11,583 |
| | 7,051 |
| |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | 22,799 |
| | (17,953 | ) | | 21,169 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 55,528 |
| | 43,945 |
| | 36,894 |
| 71,701 |
| | 89,654 |
| | 68,485 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 68,485 |
| | $ | 55,528 |
| | $ | 43,945 |
| $ | 94,500 |
| | $ | 71,701 |
| | $ | 89,654 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | |
| Stock issuance related to acquisitions | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 13,399 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, JANUARY 2, 201628, 2019, DECEMBER 29, 2018
AND JANUARY 3, 2015DECEMBER 30, 2017
The Middleby Corporation (the "company") is engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of commercial foodservice, food processing equipment and residential kitchen equipment. The company manufactures and assembles this equipment at twenty-eightNaN U.S. and twenty-threeNaN international manufacturing facilities. The company operates in three3 business segments: 1) the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group, 2) the Food Processing Equipment Group and 3) the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group.
The Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group has a broad portfolio of cooking and warmingfoodservice equipment, which enablesenable it to serve virtually any cooking, or warming, refrigeration, freezing and beverage application within a commercial kitchen or foodservice operation. This cooking and warming equipment is used across all types of foodservice operations, including quick-service restaurants, full-service restaurants, convenience stores, retail outlets, hotels and other institutions. The products offered by this group include conveyor ovens, combi-ovens, convection ovens, baking ovens, proofing ovens, deck ovens, speed cooking ovens, hydrovection ovens, ranges, fryers, rethermalizers, steam cooking equipment, food warming equipment, catering equipment, heated cabinets, charbroilers, ventless cooking systems, kitchen ventilation, induction cooking equipment, countertop cooking equipment, toasters, griddles, charcoal grills, professional mixers, stainless steel fabrication, custom millwork, professional refrigerators, blast chillers, coldrooms, ice machines, freezers, soft serve ice cream equipment, coffee and beverage dispensing equipment.equipment, home and professional craft brewing equipment and IoT solutions.
The Food Processing Equipment Group offers a broad portfolio of processing solutions for customers producing pre-cooked meat products, such as hot dogs, dinner sausages, poultry and lunchmeats and baked goods such as muffins, cookies and bread. Through its broad line of products, the company is able to deliver a wide array of cooking solutions to service a variety of food processing requirements demanded by its customers. The company can offer highly integrated solutions that provide a food processing operation a uniquely integrated solution providing for the highest level of food quality, product consistency, and reduced operating costs resulting from increased product yields, increased capacity and greater throughput and reduced labor costs through automation. The products offered by this group include a wide array of cooking and baking solutions, including batch ovens, baking ovens, proofing ovens, conveyor belt ovens, continuous processing ovens, frying systems and automated thermal processing systems. The company also provides a comprehensive portfolio of complementary food preparation equipment such as grinders, slicers, emulsifiers,reduction and emulsion systems, mixers, blenders, battering equipment, breading equipment, seeding equipment, water cutting systems, food presses, food suspension equipment, filling and depositing solutions, and forming equipment, as well as a variety of automated loading and unloading systems, food safety, food handling, freezing, defrosting and packaging equipment. This portfolio of equipment can be integrated to provide customers a highly efficient and customized solution.
The Residential Kitchen Equipment Group has a broad portfolio of innovative and professional-style residential kitchen equipment. The products offered by this group include ranges, cookers, stoves, ovens, refrigerators, dishwashers, microwaves, cooktops, wine coolers, ice machines, warming equipment, ventilation equipment and outdoor equipment.
(2) ACQUISITIONS AND PURCHASE ACCOUNTING
The company operates in a highly fragmented industry and has completed numerous acquisitions over the past several years as a component of its growth strategy. The company has acquired industry leading brands and technologies to position itself as a leader in the commercial foodservice equipment, food processing equipment and residential kitchen equipment industries.
The company has accounted for all business combinations using the acquisition method to record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial statements. The company also recognizes identifiable intangible assets, primarily trade names and customer relationships, using a discounted cash flow model. The significant assumptions used to estimate the value of the intangible assets include revenue growth rates, projected profit margins, discount rates, royalty rates, and customer attrition rates. These significant assumptions are forward-looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions. The results of operations are reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the company from the dates of acquisition.
DesmonThe following represents the company's significant acquisitions in 2019 and 2018 as well as summarized information on various acquisitions that were not individually material. The company also made smaller acquisitions not presented below which are individually and collectively immaterial.
Taylor
On January 7, 2015,June 22, 2018, the company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Desmon Food Service Equipmentthe Taylor Company ("Desmon"Taylor"), a leading manufacturer of blast chillersworld leader in beverage solutions, soft serve and refrigeration for the commercial foodservice industryice cream dispensing equipment, frozen drink machines, and automated double-sided grills, located in Nusco, Italy,Rockton, Illinois, for a purchase price of approximately $13.5 million,$1.0 billion, net of cash acquired. An additional payment is also due upon the achievement of certain financial targets. During the fourth quarter of 2015,2018, the company finalized the working capital provision provided for by the purchase agreement resulting in a returnrefund from the seller of $0.4$11.5 million.
The final allocation of cashconsideration paid for the DesmonTaylor acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) June 22, 2018 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) June 22, 2018 |
| Cash | $ | 2,551 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 2,615 |
|
| Current assets | 71,162 |
| | (2,011 | ) | | 69,151 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 21,187 |
| | (556 | ) | | 20,631 |
|
| Goodwill | 491,339 |
| | (120,497 | ) | | 370,842 |
|
| Other intangibles | 484,210 |
| | 119,550 |
| | 603,760 |
|
| Other assets | — |
| | 361 |
| | 361 |
|
| Long-term deferred tax asset | — |
| | 227 |
| | 227 |
|
| Current liabilities | (48,417 | ) | | (4,099 | ) | | (52,516 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (8,161 | ) | | (648 | ) | | (8,809 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 1,013,871 |
| | $ | (7,609 | ) | | $ | 1,006,262 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) Jan 7, 2015 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) Jan 7, 2015 |
| Cash | $ | 441 |
| | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | 429 |
|
| Current deferred tax asset | 535 |
| | — |
| | 535 |
|
| Current assets | 8,639 |
| | (1,105 | ) | | 7,534 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 7,989 |
| | — |
| | 7,989 |
|
| Goodwill | 7,175 |
| | 53 |
| | 7,228 |
|
| Other intangibles | 3,129 |
| | (899 | ) | | 2,230 |
|
| Current liabilities | (8,668 | ) | | 998 |
| | (7,670 | ) |
| Long-term deferred tax liability | (2,389 | ) | | 282 |
| | (2,107 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (2,463 | ) | | 269 |
| | (2,194 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Consideration paid at closing | $ | 14,388 |
| | $ | (414 | ) | | $ | 13,974 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration | 2,416 |
| | (269 | ) | | 2,147 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 16,804 |
| | $ | (683 | ) | | $ | 16,121 |
|
The current deferred tax assets and long term deferred tax liabilities amounted to $0.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively. These net liabilities are comprised of $0.7 million of deferred tax liabilities related to the difference between the book and tax basis of identifiable intangible assets, $1.1 million of liabilities arising from the difference between the book and tax basis of tangible asset and liability accounts, net of $0.2 million of assets related to foreign net operating loss carry forwards.
The goodwill and $1.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350 "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other". Other intangibles also includes $0.6 million allocated to customer relationships and $0.3 million allocated to developed technology, which are to be amortized over periods of 9 years and 7 years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Desmon are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The Desmon purchase agreement includes an earnout provision providing for a contingent payment due to the sellers to the extent certain financial targets are exceeded. This earnout is payable within the second quarter of each of the fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively, if Desmon exceeds certain sales targets for fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The contractual obligation associated with the contingent earnout provision recognized on the acquisition date is $2.1 million.
Goldstein Eswood
On January 30, 2015, the company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of J. Goldstein & Co. Pty. Ltd. ("Goldstein") and Eswood Australia Pty. Ltd. ("Eswood" and together with Goldstein, "Goldstein Eswood") for a purchase price of approximately $27.4 million. Goldstein is a leading manufacturer of cooking equipment including ranges, ovens, griddles, fryers and warming equipment and Eswood is a leading manufacturer of dishwashing equipment, both for the commercial foodservice industry and located in Smithfield, Australia. An additional payment is also due upon the achievement of certain financial targets. During the third quarter of 2015, the company finalized the working capital provision provided by the purchase agreement resulting in no adjustment to the original purchase price.
The final allocation of cash paid for the Goldstein acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) Jan 30, 2015 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) Jan 30, 2015 |
| Current assets | $ | 8,036 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,036 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 8,690 |
| | — |
| | 8,690 |
|
| Goodwill | 8,493 |
| | (2,727 | ) | | 5,766 |
|
| Other intangibles | 5,648 |
| | 3,113 |
| | 8,761 |
|
| Current liabilities | (1,806 | ) | | (202 | ) | | (2,008 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (1,655 | ) | | (184 | ) | | (1,839 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Consideration paid at closing | $ | 27,406 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,406 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration | 1,655 |
| | 183 |
| | 1,838 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 29,061 |
| | $ | 183 |
| | $ | 29,244 |
|
The goodwill and $2.8$304.7 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $5.9include $290.9 million allocated to customer relationships, $1.7 million of existing developed oven technology, $4.4 million of equipment backlog, and less than $0.1$2.1 million allocated toof deferred service backlog, which are to bebeing amortized over periods of 7up to 15 years, 5 years, 3 months, and 3 months,years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Goldstein EswoodTaylor are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. TheseA significant portion of the assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The Goldstein Eswood purchase agreement includes an earnout provision providing for a contingent payment due to the sellers to the extent certain financial targets are exceeded. This earnout is payable within the second quarter of each of the fiscal years 2016 and 2017, respectively, if Goldstein Eswood exceeds certain sales targets for fiscal 2015 and 2016, respectively. The contractual obligation associated with the contingent earnout provision recognized on the acquisition date is $1.8 million.
MarsalCooking Solutions Group
On February 10, 2015,April 1, 2019, the company completed its acquisition of certain assetsall of Marsal & Sons,the capital stock of Cooking Solutions Group, Inc. ("Marsal"Cooking Solutions Group"), a leading manufacturer from Standex International Corporation, which consists of deck ovens for the commercial foodservice industry,brands APW Wyott, Bakers Pride, BKI and Ultrafryer with locations in Texas, South Carolina and Mexico for a purchase price of approximately $5.5 million.$106.1 million, net of cash acquired. During the secondthird quarter of 2015, the company finalized the working capital provision provided by the purchase agreement resulting in no adjustment to the purchase price.
The final allocation of cash paid for the Marsal acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands) :
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) Feb 10, 2015 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) Feb 10, 2015 |
| Current assets | $ | 455 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 455 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 201 |
| | (6 | ) | | 195 |
|
| Goodwill | 3,012 |
| | 6 |
| | 3,018 |
|
| Other intangibles | 2,027 |
| | — |
| | 2,027 |
|
| Current liabilities | (195 | ) | | — |
| | (195 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 5,500 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,500 |
|
The goodwill and $1.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $0.5 million allocated to customer relationships, $0.1 million allocated to developed technology and less than $0.1 million allocated to backlog, which are to be amortized over periods of 4 years, 5 years and 3 months, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Marsal are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Thurne
On April 7, 2015, the company completed its acquisition of certain assets of the High Speed Slicing business unit of Marel ("Thurne"), a leading manufacturer of slicing equipment for the food processing industry located in Norwich, United Kingdom, for a purchase price of approximately $12.6 million. During the second quarter of 2015,2019, the company finalized the working capital provision provided for by the purchase agreement resulting in a refund from the seller of $2.7 million.
The final allocation of cash paid for the Thurne acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) Apr 7, 2015 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) Apr 7, 2015 |
| Current assets | $ | 3,419 |
| | $ | (275 | ) | | $ | 3,144 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 3,334 |
| | — |
| | 3,334 |
|
| Goodwill | 609 |
| | 2,378 |
| | 2,987 |
|
| Other intangibles | 3,625 |
| | (2,024 | ) | | 1,601 |
|
| Current liabilities | (1,115 | ) | | — |
| | (1,115 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 9,872 |
| | $ | 79 |
| | $ | 9,951 |
|
The goodwill and $0.4 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $0.6 million allocated to customer relationships, $0.6 million allocated to developed technology and $0.1 million allocated to backlog, which are to be amortized over periods of 9 years, 7 years, and 3 months, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Thurne are allocated to the Food Processing Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Induc
On May 30, 2015, the company completed its acquisition of certain assets of the Induc Commercial Electronics Co. Ltd. ("Induc"), a leading manufacturer of induction cooking equipment for the commercial foodservice industry located in Qingdao, China, for a purchase price of approximately $10.6 million. An additional deferred payment of approximately $1.5 million is also due to the seller on the second anniversary of the acquisition. An additional payment is also due upon the achievement of certain financial targets. During the second quarter of 2016, the company finalized the working capital provision provided for by the purchase agreement resulting in an additional payment to the seller of $0.2 million.
The final allocation of cash paid for the Induc acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) May 30, 2015 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) May 30, 2015 |
| Current assets | $ | 1,705 |
| | $ | (325 | ) | | $ | 1,380 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 536 |
| | 353 |
| | 889 |
|
| Goodwill | 13,496 |
| | (979 | ) | | 12,517 |
|
| Other intangibles | 1,500 |
| | (300 | ) | | 1,200 |
|
| Other assets | 32 |
| | (32 | ) | | — |
|
| Current liabilities | (854 | ) | | 854 |
| | — |
|
| Other non-current liabilities | (5,793 | ) | | 586 |
| | (5,207 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Consideration paid at closing | $ | 10,622 |
| | $ | 157 |
| | $ | 10,779 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Deferred payment | 1,516 |
| | (44 | ) | | 1,472 |
|
| Contingent consideration | 4,276 |
| | (541 | ) | | 3,735 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 16,414 |
| | $ | (428 | ) | | $ | 15,986 |
|
The goodwill and $0.5 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $0.7 million allocated to customer relationships, which is to be amortized over a period of 9 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Induc are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The Induc purchase agreement includes an earnout provision providing for a contingent payment due to the sellers to the extent certain financial targets are exceeded. This earnout is payable within the first quarter of each of the fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, if Induc exceeds certain sales and earnings targets for fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The contractual obligation associated with the contingent earnout provision recognized on the acquisition date is $3.7$0.1 million.
AGA
On September 23, 2015, the company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of AGA Rangemaster Group plc ("AGA") a leading manufacturer of residential kitchen equipment including ranges, ovens and refrigeration for a purchase price of approximately $184.7 million, net of cash acquired. AGA is headquartered in Leamington Spa, United Kingdom. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the company completed the purchase of the minority interest of an AGA subsidiary for approximately $4.3 million.
The final allocation of cash paid for the AGA acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) Sep 23, 2015 | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) Sep 23, 2015 |
| Cash | $ | 15,316 |
| | $ | 1,013 |
| | $ | 16,329 |
|
| Current assets | 163,216 |
| | (27,193 | ) | | 136,023 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 61,423 |
| | 16,309 |
| | 77,732 |
|
| Goodwill | 144,645 |
| | 71,049 |
| | 215,694 |
|
| Other intangibles | 190,000 |
| | (67,020 | ) | | 122,980 |
|
| Deferred tax asset | 5,306 |
| | 9,439 |
| | 14,745 |
|
| Other assets | 1,573 |
| | 978 |
| | 2,551 |
|
| Current portion long-term debt | (30,703 | ) | | 21 |
| | (30,682 | ) |
| Current liabilities | (147,279 | ) | | (16,929 | ) | | (164,208 | ) |
| Long term debt | (138 | ) | | (89 | ) | | (227 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (202,312 | ) | | 12,422 |
| | (189,890 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 201,047 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 201,047 |
|
The long-term deferred tax asset amounted to $14.7 million. These net assets are comprised of $35.7 million of assets related to pension liabilities, $2.4 million of assets related to federal net operating loss carry forwards and $3.5 million of assets related to the difference between the book and tax basis of tangible assets and liability accounts, net of $26.9 million of deferred tax liabilities related to the difference between the book and tax basis of identifiable intangible assets. Net operating loss carryforwards are subject to carryforward limitations.
The goodwill and $89.9 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $32.2 million allocated to customer relationships and $0.8 million allocated to backlog, which are to be amortized over a period of 7 years and 3 months, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of AGA are allocated to the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Lynx
On December 15, 2015, the company completed its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Lynx Grills, Inc. ("Lynx"), a leading manufacturer of premium residential outdoor equipment located in Downey, California, for a purchase price of approximately $84.0 million, net of cash acquired. During the third quarter of 2016, the company finalized the working capital provision provided for by the purchase agreement resulting in an additional payment to the seller of $0.3 million.
The final allocation of cash paid for the Lynx acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) Dec 15, 2015 | | Preliminary Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) Dec 15, 2015 |
| Cash | $ | 276 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 276 |
|
| Current deferred tax asset | 467 |
| | 1,075 |
| | 1,542 |
|
| Current assets | 18,630 |
| | (296 | ) | | 18,334 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,690 |
| | — |
| | 1,690 |
|
| Goodwill | 42,502 |
| | (4,600 | ) | | 37,902 |
|
| Other intangibles | 39,800 |
| | 7,247 |
| | 47,047 |
|
| Other assets | 130 |
| | — |
| | 130 |
|
| Current liabilities | (6,208 | ) | | (1,376 | ) | | (7,584 | ) |
| Long term deferred tax liability | (12,589 | ) | | (151 | ) | | (12,740 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (666 | ) | | (1,613 | ) | | (2,279 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 84,032 |
| | $ | 286 |
| | $ | 84,318 |
|
The current deferred tax assets and long term deferred tax liabilities amounted to $1.5 million and $12.7 million, respectively. These net liabilities are comprised of $16.7 million of deferred tax liabilities related to the difference between book and tax basis of identifiable intangible assets, net of $4.2 million related to federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and $1.3 million of assets arising from the difference between the book and tax basis of tangible assets and liability accounts. Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to carryforward limitations.
The goodwill and $31.4 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $15.6 million allocated to customer relationships and less than $0.1 million allocated to backlog, which are to be amortized over a period of 8 years and 3 months, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Lynx are allocated to the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Emico
On May 20, 2016, the company completed its acquisition of certain assets of Emico Automated Bakery Equipment Solutions ("Emico"), manufacturer of high speed dough make-up bakery equipment located in Sante Fe Springs, California, for a purchase price of approximately $1.0 million. Additional deferred payments of approximately $1.6 million in aggregate are also due to the seller during the two year period subsequent to the acquisition.
The following estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are provisional and are based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially
reported) April 1, 2019 | | Preliminary Measurement
Period
Adjustments | | (as adjusted)
April 1, 2019 |
| Cash | $ | 843 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 843 |
|
| Current assets | 33,666 |
| | (1,325 | ) | | 32,341 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 15,959 |
| | (243 | ) | | 15,716 |
|
| Goodwill | 31,207 |
| | 5,327 |
| | 36,534 |
|
| Other intangibles | 53,450 |
| | (5,850 | ) | | 47,600 |
|
| Other assets | — |
| | 1,470 |
| | 1,470 |
|
| Current liabilities | (15,130 | ) | | (368 | ) | | (15,498 | ) |
| Long-term deferred tax liability | (13,082 | ) | | 2,226 |
| | (10,856 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | — |
| | (1,163 | ) | | (1,163 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 106,913 |
| | $ | 74 |
| | $ | 106,987 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) May 20, 2016 | | Preliminary Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) May 20, 2016 |
| Current assets | $ | 746 |
| | (65 | ) | | 681 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,816 |
| | 142 |
| | 1,958 |
|
| Current liabilities | (934 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (974 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (628 | ) | | (37 | ) | | (665 | ) |
| | | | | |
|
| Consideration paid at closing | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,000 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Deferred payments | 1,559 |
| | 77 |
| | 1,636 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 2,559 |
| | $ | 77 |
| | $ | 2,636 |
|
The goodwill and $24.7 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name is subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350350. Other intangibles also include $22.5 million allocated to customer relationships and is$0.4 million allocated to backlog, which are being amortized over periods of 9 years and 3 months, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Cooking Solutions Group are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The company believes that information gathered to date provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, but the company is waiting for additional information necessary to finalize those fair values. Thus, the provisional measurements of fair value set forth above are subject to change. The company expects towill complete the purchase price allocation as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.
Follett
On May 31, 2016, the company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Follett Corporation ("Follett"), a leading manufacturer of ice machines, ice and water dispensing equipment, ice storage and transport products and medical grade refrigeration products for the foodservice and healthcare industries headquartered in Easton, Pennsylvania, for a purchase price of approximately $207.7 million, net of cash acquired. During the first quarter of 2017,fiscal 2020.
Other 2018 Acquisitions
During 2018 the company finalizedcompleted various other acquisitions that were not individually material. The final allocation of consideration paid for the working capital provision providedother 2018 acquisitions is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preliminary Opening Balance Sheet | | Measurement
Period
Adjustments | | Adjusted Opening Balance Sheet |
| Cash | $ | 16,293 |
| | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 16,256 |
|
| Current assets | 38,048 |
| | 115 |
| | 38,163 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 22,340 |
| | 3,658 |
| | 25,998 |
|
| Goodwill | 126,647 |
| | (14,312 | ) | | 112,335 |
|
| Other intangibles | 46,902 |
| | 15,900 |
| | 62,802 |
|
| Other assets | 14 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
|
| Current portion of long term debt | (3,329 | ) | | — |
| | (3,329 | ) |
| Current liabilities | (23,606 | ) | | (1,521 | ) | | (25,127 | ) |
| Long term debt | (2,677 | ) | | — |
| | (2,677 | ) |
| Long-term deferred tax liability | (8,937 | ) | | (4,923 | ) | | (13,860 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (3,699 | ) | | — |
| | (3,699 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Consideration paid at closing | $ | 207,996 |
| | $ | (1,120 | ) | | $ | 206,876 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration | 3,454 |
| | — |
| | 3,454 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 211,450 |
| | $ | (1,120 | ) | | $ | 210,330 |
|
The long term deferred tax liability amounted to $13.9 million. The net deferred tax liability is comprised of $13.1 million of deferred tax liability related to the difference between the book and tax basis of identifiable intangible assets and $0.8 million of deferred tax liability related to the difference between the book and tax basis on identifiable tangible asset and liability accounts.
The goodwill and $30.7 million of other intangibles associated with the trade names are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also include $28.6 million allocated to customer relationships, $0.3 million allocated to developed technology and $3.3 million allocated to backlog, which are being amortized over periods of 5 to 7 years, 5 years, and 3 months to 1 year, respectively. Goodwill of $85.4 million and other intangibles of $42.9 million of the companies are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Goodwill of $26.9 million and other intangibles of $19.9 million are allocated to the Food Processing Equipment Group for by thesegment reporting purposes. Of these assets, goodwill of $22.1 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
One purchase agreement resulting inincludes an additional paymentearnout provision providing for contingent payments due to the seller of $0.7sellers to the extent certain financial targets are exceeded. The earnout is payable between 2020 and 2021, if the company exceeds certain sales and earnings targets. The contractual obligation associated with the contingent earnout provision recognized on the acquisition date is $3.5 million.
Other 2019 Acquisitions
During 2019 the company completed various other acquisitions that were not individually material. The following estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are provisional and are based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preliminary Opening Balance Sheet | | Measurement
Period
Adjustments | | Adjusted Opening Balance Sheet |
| Cash | $ | 2,683 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 2,673 |
|
| Current assets | 21,525 |
| | 980 |
| | 22,505 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 8,920 |
| | 18 |
| | 8,938 |
|
| Goodwill | 99,838 |
| | (3,096 | ) | | 96,742 |
|
| Other intangibles | 64,019 |
| | 199 |
| | 64,218 |
|
| Long-term deferred tax asset | 1,288 |
| | 1,478 |
| | 2,766 |
|
| Other assets | 137 |
| | 854 |
| | 991 |
|
| Current liabilities | (20,437 | ) | | (535 | ) | | (20,972 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (6,170 | ) | | (529 | ) | | (6,699 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Consideration paid at closing | $ | 171,803 |
| | $ | (641 | ) | | $ | 171,162 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Deferred payments | 2,404 |
| | — |
| | 2,404 |
|
| Contingent consideration | 4,258 |
| | — |
| | 4,258 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 178,465 |
| | $ | (641 | ) | | $ | 177,824 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (as initially reported) May 31, 2016 | | Preliminary Measurement Period Adjustments | | (as adjusted) May 31, 2016 |
| Cash | $ | 22,620 |
| | $ | 1,359 |
| | $ | 23,979 |
|
| Current assets | 41,602 |
| | (72 | ) | | 41,530 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 19,868 |
| | — |
| | 19,868 |
|
| Goodwill | 76,220 |
| | 752 |
| | 76,972 |
|
| Other intangibles | 82,450 |
| | — |
| | 82,450 |
|
| Other assets | 1,358 |
| | — |
| | 1,358 |
|
| Current liabilities | (11,779 | ) | | (2,039 | ) | | (13,818 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (616 | ) | | — |
| | (616 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 231,723 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 231,723 |
|
The goodwill and $55.0$29.6 million of other intangibles associated with the trade namenames are subject to the non-amortization provisions of ASC 350. Other intangibles also includes $22.5include $23.9 million allocated to customer relationships, $4.5$9.2 million allocated to developed technology and $0.5$1.5 million allocated to backlog, which are to bebeing amortized over periods of 62 to 10 years, 65 to 7 years, and 3 months, respectively. TheseGoodwill of $43.6 million and other intangibles of $35.2 million of the companies are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. Goodwill of $43.6 million and other intangibles of $21.3 million are allocated to the Food Processing Equipment Group. Goodwill of $9.5 million and other intangibles of $7.7 million are allocated to the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. Of these assets, goodwill of $85.5 million and intangibles of $54.1 million are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
One purchase agreement includes deferred payments and earnout provisions providing for contingent payments due to the sellers to the extent certain financial targets are exceeded. The deferred payments are payable between 2020 and 2022. The contractual obligation associated with the deferred payments on the acquisition date is $2.4 million. The earnout is payable in 2022, if the company exceeds certain sales and earnings targets. The contractual obligation associated with the contingent earnout provision recognized on the acquisition date is $4.3 million.
The company believes that information gathered to date provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, but the company is waiting for additional information necessary to finalize those fair values.values for substantially all 2019 acquisitions. Thus, the provisional measurements of fair value set forth above are subject to change. The company expects towill complete the purchase price allocation as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.allocations during 2020.
Pro forma financial informationForma Financial Information
In accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations”Business Combinations, the following unaudited pro forma results of operations for the yearstwelve months ended December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, assumes the 20152018 and 2019 acquisitions of Goldstein Eswood, Marsal, Induc, Thurne, AGA and Lynx and the 2016 acquisition of Follett were completed on January 4, 2015December 31, 2017 (first day of fiscal 2015)year 2018). The following pro forma results include adjustments to reflect additional interest expense to fund the acquisition,acquisitions, amortization of intangibles associated with the acquisition,acquisitions, and the effects of adjustments made to the carrying value of certain assets (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | Twelve Months Ended |
| | December 31, 2016 | | January 2, 2016 | December 28, 2019 | | December 29, 2018 |
| Net sales | $ | 2,335,352 |
| | $ | 2,305,622 |
| $ | 3,022,279 |
| | $ | 3,078,487 |
|
| Net earnings | 288,875 |
| | 195,982 |
| 344,823 |
| | 285,642 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| |
| | |
|
| Basic | 5.07 |
| | 3.44 |
| $ | 6.20 |
| | $ | 5.14 |
|
| Diluted | 5.06 |
| | 3.44 |
| $ | 6.20 |
| | $ | 5.14 |
|
The historical consolidated financial information of the Company and the acquisitions have been adjusted in the pro forma information to give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly attributable to the transactions, (2) factually supportable and (3) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. Pro forma data may not be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had these acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results. Additionally, the pro forma financial information does not reflect the costs which the company has incurred or may incur to integrate Goldstein Eswood, Marsal, Induc, Thurne, AGA, Lynx and Follett.the acquired businesses.
(3) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures. Significant items that are subject to such estimates and judgments include allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for excess and obsolete inventories, long-lived and intangible assets, warranty reserves, insurance reserves, income tax reserves and post-retirement obligations. On an ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest December 31. Fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017 ended on December 31, 2016, January 2, 201628, 2019, December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively, and includedwith each year including 52 52 and 53 weeks, respectively.weeks.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with current year presentation, including restructuringthe non-operating components of pension benefit previously reported in accrued expenses previously classifiedand other liabilities within the changes in generalassets and administrative expenses.liabilities, net of acquisitions to an individual adjustment to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
| |
| (b) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The company considers all short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. The company’s policy is to invest its excess cash in interest-bearing deposits with major banks that are subject to minimal credit and market risk.
Accounts receivable, as shown in the consolidated balance sheets, are net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $12.614.9 million and $8.813.6 million at December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, all accounts receivable are expected to be collected within one year.
(d) Inventories
Inventories are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Costs for inventory have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. The company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based on its judgment of future realization. Inventories at December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 are as follows:follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Raw materials and parts | $ | 277,394 |
| | $ | 245,976 |
|
| Work in process | 58,663 |
| | 51,164 |
|
| Finished goods | 249,642 |
| | 224,670 |
|
| | $ | 585,699 |
| | $ | 521,810 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Raw materials and parts | $ | 154,647 |
| | $ | 139,117 |
|
| Work in process | 35,975 |
| | 34,771 |
|
| Finished goods | 177,621 |
| | 180,262 |
|
| | $ | 368,243 |
| | $ | 354,150 |
|
| |
| (e) | Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost as follows:
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Land | $ | 43,467 |
| | $ | 32,523 |
|
| Building and improvements | 229,025 |
| | 196,743 |
|
| Furniture and fixtures | 67,992 |
| | 64,586 |
|
| Machinery and equipment | 209,290 |
| | 188,454 |
|
| | 549,774 |
| | 482,306 |
|
| Less accumulated depreciation | (197,629 | ) | | (167,737 | ) |
| | $ | 352,145 |
| | $ | 314,569 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Land | $ | 21,309 |
| | $ | 18,401 |
|
| Building and improvements | 134,158 |
| | 108,210 |
|
| Furniture and fixtures | 56,851 |
| | 52,738 |
|
| Machinery and equipment | 128,688 |
| | 120,746 |
|
| | 341,006 |
| | 300,095 |
|
| Less accumulated depreciation | (119,435 | ) | | (100,345 | ) |
| | $ | 221,571 |
| | $ | 199,750 |
|
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives are estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into account anticipated technological or other changes. The company periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense in future periods.
Following is a summary of the estimated useful lives:
|
| | |
| Description | | Life |
| Building and improvements | | 20 to 40 years |
| Furniture and fixtures | | 3 to 7 years |
| Machinery and equipment | | 3 to 10 years |
Depreciation expense amounted to $26.237.9 million, $25.535.8 million and $15.529.7 million in fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.
Expenditures which significantly extend useful lives are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Asset impairments are recorded whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the recorded value of an asset is greater than the sum of its expected future undiscounted cash flows.
| |
| (f) | Goodwill and Other Intangibles |
In accordance with ASC 350 “Goodwill-Intangibles and Other”,The company’s business acquisitions result in the company’srecognition of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangiblesintangible assets, which are revieweda significant portion of the company’s total assets. The company recognizes goodwill and other intangible assets under the guidance of ASC Topic 350-10, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Identifiable intangible assets are recognized separately from goodwill and include trademarks and trade names, technology, customer relationships and other specifically identifiable assets. Trademarks and trade names are deemed to be indefinite-lived. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are subject to impairment testing.
The company performs the annual impairment assessment for impairment annually on thegoodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of first day of the fourth quarter and whenevermore frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. The company initially performs a qualitative analysis to determine if it is more likely than not that the goodwill balance or indefinite-life intangible asset is impaired. In conducting a qualitative assessment, the Company analyzes a variety of events or changes in circumstances indicatefactors that may influence the carrying amountfair value of an asset maythe reporting unit or indefinite-life intangible, including, but not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of goodwilllimited to: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, share price and other indefinite lived intangibles,relevant factors.
If an indicator of impairment is determined from the qualitative analysis, then the company considers changes in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Estimateswill perform a two-step quantitative analysis. First, the fair value of future cash flows are judgmentseach reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the company performs a hypothetical purchase price allocation based on the company’s experience and knowledgereporting unit’s fair value to determine the fair value of operations. These estimates canthe reporting unit’s goodwill. Any resulting difference will be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation, competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company’s estimates or the underlying assumptions changea charge to impairment of intangible assets in the future,Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period in which the determination is made. Fair value is determined using a combination of present value techniques and market prices of comparable businesses.
The company may be requiredcompleted its annual impairment test for goodwill as of September 29, 2019. The company performed a qualitative assessment to record impairment charges. Any such charge could have a material adverse effectevaluate goodwill for all reporting units. Based on the company’s reported net earnings.qualitative assessment it was determined there was 0 impairment of goodwill. The company has not recognized any goodwill impairments and therefore 0 accumulated impairment loss.
Goodwill is allocated to the business segments as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial Foodservice | | Food Processing | | Residential Kitchen | | Total |
| Balance as of December 30, 2017 | $ | 631,451 |
| | $ | 198,278 |
| | $ | 435,081 |
| | $ | 1,264,810 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | 487,032 |
| | 30,624 |
| | — |
| | 517,656 |
|
| Measurement period adjustments to goodwill acquired in prior year | (1,559 | ) | | (5,679 | ) | | — |
| | (7,238 | ) |
| Exchange effect | (14,857 | ) | | (4,169 | ) | | (13,027 | ) | | (32,053 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 29, 2018 | $ | 1,102,067 |
| | $ | 219,054 |
| | $ | 422,054 |
| | $ | 1,743,175 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | 81,339 |
| | 43,613 |
| | 9,503 |
| | 134,455 |
|
| Measurement period adjustments to goodwill acquired in prior year | (27,929 | ) | | (3,722 | ) | | — |
| | (31,651 | ) |
| Exchange effect | (1,925 | ) | | (1,266 | ) | | 6,959 |
| | 3,768 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 28, 2019 | $ | 1,153,552 |
| | $ | 257,679 |
| | $ | 438,516 |
| | $ | 1,849,747 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial Foodservice | | Food Processing | | Residential Kitchen | | Total |
| Balance as of January 3, 2015 | $ | 450,890 |
| | $ | 134,512 |
| | $ | 223,089 |
| | $ | 808,491 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | 29,032 |
| | 2,987 |
| | 166,774 |
| | 198,793 |
|
| Measurement period adjustments to goodwill acquired in prior year | (1,126 | ) | | 63 |
| | (8,000 | ) | | (9,063 | ) |
| Exchange effect | (5,669 | ) | | (3,470 | ) | | (5,743 | ) | | (14,882 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of January 2, 2016 | $ | 473,127 |
| | $ | 134,092 |
| | $ | 376,120 |
| | $ | 983,339 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | 76,972 |
| | 1,958 |
| | — |
| | 78,930 |
|
| Measurement period adjustments to goodwill acquired in prior year | (503 | ) | | — |
| | 86,822 |
| | 86,319 |
|
| Exchange effect | (7,506 | ) | | (1,370 | ) | | (46,990 | ) | | (55,866 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 542,090 |
| | $ | 134,680 |
| | $ | 415,952 |
| | $ | 1,092,722 |
|
The company has not recognized any goodwill impairments and therefore no accumulated impairment loss.
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 28, 2019 | | December 29, 2018 |
| | Estimated Weighted Avg Remaining Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization |
| | Estimated Weighted Avg Remaining Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization |
|
| Amortized intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships | 9.2 | | $ | 717,397 |
| | $ | (283,846 | ) | | 9.5 | | $ | 644,145 |
| | $ | (222,661 | ) |
| Backlog | 1.3 | | 29,426 |
| | (28,283 | ) | | 2.8 | | 27,065 |
| | (24,755 | ) |
| Developed technology | 5.2 | | 32,999 |
| | (21,378 | ) | | 5.9 | | 39,624 |
| | (20,998 | ) |
| | | | $ | 779,822 |
| | $ | (333,507 | ) | | | | $ | 710,834 |
| | $ | (268,414 | ) |
| Indefinite-lived assets: | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Trademarks and tradenames | | | $ | 997,066 |
| | |
| | | | $ | 918,604 |
| | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | January 2, 2016 |
| | Estimated Weighted Avg Remaining Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization |
| | Estimated Weighted Avg Remaining Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization |
|
| Amortized intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer lists | 5.5 | | $ | 251,025 |
| | $ | (136,895 | ) | | 6.1 | | $ | 264,373 |
| | $ | (109,096 | ) |
| Backlog | 0.0 | | 13,550 |
| | (13,550 | ) | | 0.3 | | 13,763 |
| | (12,963 | ) |
| Developed technology | 4.8 | | 24,874 |
| | (17,924 | ) | | 3.8 | | 20,868 |
| | (17,220 | ) |
| | | | $ | 289,449 |
| | $ | (168,369 | ) | | | | $ | 299,004 |
| | $ | (139,279 | ) |
| Indefinite-lived assets: | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Trademarks and tradenames | | | $ | 575,091 |
| | |
| | | | $ | 589,705 |
| | |
|
The company completed its annual impairment for other intangibles as of September 29, 2019. We identified indicators of impairment associated with certain tradenames within the Food Processing and Residential Kitchen reporting units based on the qualitative assessment, which required the completion of a quantitative impairment assessment. The primary indicator of impairment was lower than expected revenue performance in the current year. Based on the results of the quantitative assessment, the company determined there was 0 impairment of any of the indefinite-lived intangible assets.
In performing the quantitative assessment of indefinite-life intangible assets, primarily tradenames, the company estimated the fair value using the relief-from-royalty method which requires assumptions related to projected revenues; assumed royalty rates that could be payable if we did not own the brand; and a market participant discount rate based on a weighted-average cost of capital.
The company elected to perform a qualitative assessment on the other indefinite-life intangible assets noting no events that indicated that the fair value was less than carrying value that would require a quantitative impairment assessment.
The estimates of future cash flows used in determining the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets involve significant management judgment and are based upon assumptions about expected future operating performance, economic conditions, market conditions and cost of capital. Inherent in estimating the future cash flows are uncertainties beyond our control, such as changes in capital markets. The actual cash flows could differ materially from management's estimates due to changes in business conditions, operating performance and economic conditions.
During 2017 testing, the company determined that the Viking tradename, within the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group, was impaired. The company estimated the fair value of the tradename using a relief from royalty method under the income approach. The decline in fair value of the Viking tradename was primarily the result of weaker than expected revenue performance in 2017 and a corresponding reduction of future revenue expectations. The impairment resulted from the decline in revenues attributable, in part, to the product recall announced in 2015 related to products manufactured prior to the acquisition of Viking. The fair value of the Viking tradename was estimated to be $93.0 million as compared to the carrying value of $151.0 million and resulted in a $58.0 million indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charge.
The aggregate intangible amortization expense was $29.9$64.0 million,, $27.4 $60.0 million and $24.6$38.6 million in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2020 | $ | 66,177 |
|
| 2021 | 62,246 |
|
| 2022 | 57,921 |
|
| 2023 | 51,916 |
|
| 2024 | 40,456 |
|
| 2025 and thereafter | 167,599 |
|
| | $ | 446,315 |
|
|
| | | |
| 2017 | $ | 27,802 |
|
| 2018 | 26,485 |
|
| 2019 | 18,537 |
|
| 2020 | 17,671 |
|
| 2021 | 18,169 |
|
| Thereafter | 12,416 |
|
| | $ | 121,080 |
|
(g) Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016, respectively:December 29, 2018, respectively (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Accrued payroll and related expenses | $ | 81,541 |
| | $ | 74,952 |
|
| Contract liabilities | 74,511 |
| | 57,913 |
|
| Accrued warranty | 66,374 |
| | 59,451 |
|
| Accrued customer rebates | 51,709 |
| | 45,740 |
|
| Accrued short-term leases | 21,827 |
| | — |
|
| Accrued sales and other tax | 19,862 |
| | 19,452 |
|
| Accrued product liability and workers compensation | 15,164 |
| | 16,284 |
|
| Accrued agent commission | 13,816 |
| | 11,969 |
|
| Accrued professional fees | 13,368 |
| | 17,313 |
|
| Other accrued expenses | 58,378 |
| | 64,372 |
|
| | | | |
| | $ | 416,550 |
| | $ | 367,446 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Accrued payroll and related expenses | $ | 74,505 |
| | $ | 49,082 |
|
| Accrued customer rebates | 49,923 |
| | 45,154 |
|
| Advanced customer deposits | 41,735 |
| | 57,595 |
|
| Accrued warranty | 40,851 |
| | 37,901 |
|
| Accrued professional fees | 16,605 |
| | 7,019 |
|
| Accrued sales and other tax | 13,565 |
| | 13,537 |
|
| Accrued agent commission | 12,834 |
| | 9,948 |
|
| Accrued product liability and workers compensation | 11,417 |
| | 11,635 |
|
| Product recall | 7,003 |
| | 7,786 |
|
| Restructuring | 2,295 |
| | 20,423 |
|
| Other accrued expenses | 64,872 |
| | 60,148 |
|
| | | | |
| | $ | 335,605 |
| | $ | 320,228 |
|
From time to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance coverage. The required accrual may change in the future due to new developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any such matter will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the company.
During the fourth quarter, we reached a settlement with respect to a lawsuit filed by the company arising from a prior acquisition included our Residential Kitchen Equipment Segment. The gain associated with this settlement, which is net of the release of funds in escrow, is reflected in the consolidated statement of earnings.
| |
| (i) | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
The following table summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as reported in the consolidated balance sheets:sheets (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of ($48,633) and ($36,719) | $ | (228,336 | ) | | $ | (170,938 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax of ($5,973) and $2,543 | (16,892 | ) | | 7,233 |
|
| Currency translation adjustments | (105,705 | ) | | (112,771 | ) |
| | | | |
| | $ | (350,933 | ) | | $ | (276,476 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Unrecognized pension benefit costs, net of tax of ($38,004) and ($7,287) | $ | (173,394 | ) | | $ | (23,579 | ) |
| Unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of tax of $3,655 and $6 | 5,482 |
| | 9 |
|
| Currency translation adjustments | (116,411 | ) | | (52,842 | ) |
| | | | |
| | $ | (284,323 | ) | | $ | (76,412 | ) |
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (1) were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Currency Translation Adjustment | | Pension Benefit Costs | | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) Interest Rate Swap | | Total |
| Balance as of December 30, 2017 | $ | (69,721 | ) | | $ | (203,063 | ) | | $ | 6,365 |
| | $ | (266,419 | ) |
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 (2) | — |
| | (487 | ) | | 1,619 |
| | 1,132 |
|
| Other comprehensive income before reclassification | (43,050 | ) | | 29,527 |
| | (1,166 | ) | | (14,689 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | — |
| | 3,085 |
| | 415 |
| | 3,500 |
|
| Net current-period other comprehensive income | $ | (43,050 | ) | | $ | 32,125 |
| | $ | 868 |
| | $ | (10,057 | ) |
| Balance as of December 29, 2018 | $ | (112,771 | ) | | $ | (170,938 | ) | | $ | 7,233 |
| | $ | (276,476 | ) |
Adoption of ASU 2017-12 (3) | — |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 11 |
|
| Other comprehensive income before reclassification | 7,066 |
| | (59,238 | ) | | (25,392 | ) | | (77,564 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | — |
| | 1,840 |
| | 1,256 |
| | 3,096 |
|
| Net current-period other comprehensive income | $ | 7,066 |
| | $ | (57,398 | ) | | $ | (24,125 | ) | | $ | (74,457 | ) |
| Balance as of December 28, 2019 | $ | (105,705 | ) | | $ | (228,336 | ) | | $ | (16,892 | ) | | $ | (350,933 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Currency Translation Adjustment | | Pension Benefit Costs | | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) Interest Rate Swap | | Total |
| Balance as of January 2, 2016 | $ | (52,842 | ) | | $ | (23,579 | ) | | $ | 9 |
| | $ | (76,412 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassification | (63,569 | ) | | (149,907 | ) | | 6,703 |
| | (206,773 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | — |
| | 92 |
| | (1,230 | ) | | (1,138 | ) |
| Net current-period other comprehensive income | $ | (63,569 | ) | | $ | (149,815 | ) | | $ | 5,473 |
| | $ | (207,911 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | (116,411 | ) | | $ | (173,394 | ) | | $ | 5,482 |
| | $ | (284,323 | ) |
(1) PensionAs of December 28, 2019 pension and interest rate swap amounts are net of tax.tax of $(48.6) million and $(6.0) million, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 28, 2019, the adjustments to pension benefit costs and unrealized gain/(loss) interest rate swap were net of tax of $(11.9) million and $(8.5) million, respectively.
(2) As of December 31, 2017, the company adopted ASU No. 2018-02,Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the reclassification of $1.1 million of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
(3) As of December 30, 2018, the company adopted ASU No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the recognition of less than $(0.1) million as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.
(j) Fair ValueMeasures
ASC 820 “FairFair Value Measurements and Disclosures”Disclosures defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following levels:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 – Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions
The company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value are categorized using the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Level 1 | | Fair Value Level 2 | | Fair Value Level 3 | | Total |
| As of December 28, 2019 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Financial Assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,830 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,830 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,120 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,120 |
|
| Contingent consideration | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,697 |
| | $ | 6,697 |
|
| Foreign exchange derivative contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | 901 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 901 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| As of December 29, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Financial Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 13,487 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 13,487 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,125 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,125 |
|
| Contingent consideration | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,566 |
| | $ | 3,566 |
|
| Foreign exchange derivative contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | 854 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 854 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Level 1 | | Fair Value Level 2 | | Fair Value Level 3 | | Total |
| As of December 31, 2016 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,842 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,842 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 100 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 100 |
|
| Contingent consideration | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,612 |
| | $ | 6,612 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| As of January 2, 2016 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 412 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 412 |
|
| Contingent consideration | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11,065 |
| | $ | 11,065 |
|
The contingent consideration, as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 29, 2018, relates to the earnout provisions recorded in conjunction with the acquisitions of PES, Desmon, Goldstein Eswood and Induc. The contingent consideration as of January 2, 2016 relates to the earnout provisions recorded in conjunction with the acquisitions of Spooner Vicars, PES, Concordia, Desmon, Goldstein Eswood and Induc.various purchase agreements.
The earnout provisions associated with these acquisitions are based upon performance measurements related to sales and earnings, as defined in the respective purchase agreements. On a quarterly basis, the company assesses the projected results for each of the acquisitions in comparison to the earnout targets and adjusts the liability accordingly.
Foreign currency transactions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 830 “ForeignForeign Currency Translation”Translation. The income statements of the company’s foreign operations are translated at the monthly average rates. Assets and liabilities of the company’s foreign operations are translated at exchange rates at the balance sheet date. These translation adjustments are not included in determining net income for the period but are disclosed and accumulated in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Exchange gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are included in determining net income for the period in which they occur. These transactions amounted to a gain of $0.9 million, and loss of $1.9 million, $6.8$2.6 million and $3.6$2.4 million in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, and are included in other expense on the statements of earnings.
At the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group and Residential Kitchen Equipment Group, the company recognizes revenue on the sale of its products where title transfers and when risk of loss has passed to the customer, which occurs at the time of shipment, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The sale prices of the products sold are fixed and determinable at the time of shipment. Sales are reported net of sales returns, sales incentives and cash discounts based on prior experience and other quantitative and qualitative factors.
At the Food Processing Equipment Group, the company enters into long-term sales contracts for certain products. Revenue under these long-term sales contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion method defined within ASC 605-35 “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” due to the length of time to fully manufacture and assemble the equipment. The company measures revenue recognized based on the ratio of actual labor hours incurred in relation to the total estimated labor hours to be incurred related to the contract. Because estimated labor hours to complete a project are based upon forecasts using the best available information, the actual hours may differ from original estimates. Under ASC 605, the company records the asset for revenue recognized but not yet billed on contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method in Prepaid Expenses and Other on the consolidated balance sheets. For 2016 and 2015, the amount of this asset was $12.2 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The percentage of completion method of accounting for these contracts most accurately reflects the status of these uncompleted contracts in the company's financial statements and most accurately measures the matching of revenues with expenses. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the amount of the estimated loss is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
| |
(m) | Shipping and Handling Costs |
Fees billed to the customer for shipping and handling are classified as a component of net revenues. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of products sold.
In the normal course of business, the company issues product warranties for specific product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made as changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
A rollforward of the warranty reserve for the fiscal years 20162019 and 20152018 are as follows:
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 59,451 |
| | $ | 52,834 |
|
| Warranty reserve related to acquisitions | 7,353 |
| | 5,884 |
|
| Warranty expense | 68,842 |
| | 62,314 |
|
| Warranty claims paid | (69,272 | ) | | (61,581 | ) |
| Ending balance | $ | 66,374 |
| | $ | 59,451 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Beginning balance | $ | 37,901 |
| | $ | 28,786 |
|
| Warranty reserve related to acquisitions | 2,446 |
| | 5,815 |
|
| Warranty expense | 48,975 |
| | 45,994 |
|
| Warranty claims paid | (48,471 | ) | | (42,694 | ) |
| Ending balance | $ | 40,851 |
| | $ | 37,901 |
|
| |
(o)(n) | Research and Development Costs |
Research and development costs, included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of earnings, are charged to expense when incurred. These costs were $26.3$41.2 million,, $22.4 $35.3 million and $22.6$29.1 million in fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.
| |
| (o) | Non-Cash Share-Based Compensation |
(p) Non-Cash Share-Based Compensation
The company estimates the fair value of restricted share grants and stock options at the time of grant and recognizes compensation costs over the vesting period of the awards and options. Non-cash share-based compensation expense of $27.9$8.1 million,, $15.9 $2.5 million and $16.7$6.2 million was recognized for fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, associated with restricted share grants. The company recorded a related tax benefit of $10.5$0.5 million,, $6.0 less than $0.1 million and $4.6$2.4 million in fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there was $16.7$52.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted share grant compensation arrangements, which will be recognized over aif all performance conditions are fully achieved. The remaining weighted average life of 2.1is 1.65 years.
Share grant awards not subject to market conditions for vesting are valued at the closing share price of the company’s stock as of the date of the grant. The company issued 382,125537,059 and 100,704132,038 restricted share grant awards in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively, with a fair value of $36.0$60.8 million and $10.9$13.3 million, respectively. Share grant awards issued in 20162019 and 20152018 are generally performance based and were not subject to market conditions. The fair value of $94.19$113.26 and $107.81$100.50 per share for the awards for 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively, represent the closing share price of the company’s stock as of the date of grant.
“Basic earnings per share” is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares actually outstanding, and “diluted earnings per share” is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and other dilutive securities.
The company’s potentially dilutive securities consist of shares issuable on exercise of outstanding options and vesting of restricted stock grants computed using the treasury method and amounted to 55,0009,000, 22,00028,000, and 20,0004,000 for fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. There were no anti-dilutive equity awards excluded from common stock equivalents for 2016, 20152019, 2018 or 2014.2017.
| |
(r)(q) | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
Cash paid for interest was $21.080.9 million, $14.855.3 million and $14.825.9 million in fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. Cash payments totaling $89.091.5 million, $94.679.0 million, and $43.5123.3 million were made for income taxes during fiscal 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.
| |
(s)(r) | New Accounting Pronouncements |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounts Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This update amends the current guidance on revenue recognition related to contracts with customers. Under ASU No. 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. In 2016, the FASB issued additional updates: ASU No. 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12 and 2016-20. These updates provide further guidance and clarification on specific items within the previously issued update. In July 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date of the new revenue standard to be effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017 for public companies. Companies may elect to adopt the standard at the original effective date which, for the company is, for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, but not earlier. The guidance can be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. The company will adopt this standard, as required, for fiscal year 2018 and expects to use the modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect, if any, recognized in the opening balance of retained earnings. The company is continuing to evaluate the impact the application of these ASU's will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting Pronouncements - Recently Adopted
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation - Stock Compensation”. This update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update is effective for annual and corresponding interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items". This update eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from the current guidance. This update is effective for annual and corresponding interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires debt issuance costs to be recorded as a direct reduction of the debt liability on the balance sheet rather than as an asset. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The new guidance was applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, "Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer's Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets". This ASU is intended to provide a practical expedient for the measurement date of defined benefit plan assets and obligations. The practical expedient allows employers with fiscal year-end dates that do not fall on a calendar month-end (e.g., companies with a 52/53-week fiscal year) to measure pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets and obligations as of the calendar month-end date closest to the fiscal year-end. The FASB also provided a similar practical expedient for interim remeasurements for significant events. This ASU requires perspective application and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which is intended to simplify the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the current lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The guidance applies only to inventories for which cost is determined by methods other than last-in, first-out and the retail inventory method. Application of the standard, which should be applied prospectively, is required for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Interest - Imputation of Interest” which relates to the presentation of debt issuance costs. This standard clarifies the guidance set forth in FASB ASU 2015-03, which required that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset. The new pronouncement clarifies that debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements could continue to be presented as an asset and be subsequently amortized over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. The adoption of this guidance by the company did not result in a material reclassification of debt issuance costs.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”, which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, acquirers must recognize measurement-period adjustments during the period in which they determine the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts they would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes". The amendments in ASU 2015-17 simplify the accounting for, and presentation of, deferred taxes by eliminating the need to separately classify the current amount of deferred tax assets or liabilities. Instead, aggregated deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified and reported as non-current assets or liabilities. The update is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The company early adopted ASU 2015-17 effective April 3, 2016 on a prospective basis. Adoption of this ASU resulted in a reclassification of the company's net current deferred tax asset to the net non-current deferred tax liability in the company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 2, 2016. No prior periods were retrospectively adjusted.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "LeasesLeases (Topic 842)". The amendments under this pronouncement will change the way all leases with a duration of one year ofor more are treated. Under this guidance, lessees will beare required to capitalize virtually all leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and an associated financing lease liability or capitaloperating lease liability. The company adopted this guidance on December 30, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The company has elected the package of practical expedients to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs. The adoption of this guidance increased total assets and liabilities due to the recognition of right-of-use asset represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the specified lease term. The lease liability represents the lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease, measured on a discounted basis. Based on certain characteristics, leases are classified as financing leases or operating leases. Financingassets and lease liabilities those that contain provisions similaramounting to capitalized leases, are amortized like capital leases are under current accounting, as amortization expenseapproximately $96.8 million. For additional information related to the impact of adopting this guidance, see Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and interest expenseHedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities". The amendments in ASU-12 provide new guidance about income statement classification and eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. The entire change in fair value for qualifying hedge instruments included in the effectiveness is recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) and amounts deferred in OCI are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement of operations. Operating lease liabilities are amortized on a straight-line basis overline item in which the lifeearnings effect of the lease as lease expensehedged item is reported. The adoption of this guidance on December 30, 2018 did not have a material impact on the company's Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information related to the impact of adopting this guidance, see Note of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, "Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting". The amendments in ASU-08 simplify several aspects of the statementaccounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions resulting from expanding the scope of operations.Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The adoption of this guidance on December 30, 2018 did not have an impact on the company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August of 2018, the SEC published Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, "Disclosure Update and Simplification". This updateguidance streamlines disclosure requirements by removing certain redundant topics and is effective for quarterly and annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those reporting periods, beginningreports submitted after December 15,November 5, 2018. The company is currently evaluatingadoption of this guidance on December 30, 2018 resulted in the impact this standard will have on its policiespresentation and procedures pertaining to its existing and future lease arrangements, disclosure requirements and onexpansion of the company's financial position, resultsConsolidated Statements of operations or cash flows.
Changes in Stockholders' Equity to display quarter-to-quarter details.
Accounting Pronouncements - To be adopted
In MarchJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-05, "Derivatives2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships"has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The amendments in ASU 2016-05 clarifynew credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that a change inaffect the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under Topic 815 does not, in and of itself, require dedesignationcollectability of the hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.reported amount. The amendments in this update may be applied on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The company2019. As a result of the company's assessment process on its receivables and contract assets portfolio, which is evaluating the impact the applicationonly financial instrument in scope of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)". The amendments in ASU-09 simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows; howeverstandard, the company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to be material.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments". The amendments in ASU-15 address eight specific cash flow classification issues to reduce current and potential future diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's cash flows.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory". The amendments in ASU-16 prohibit the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer other than inventory until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU will have, if any, on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business". The amendments in ASU-01 clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December15, 2017. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this ASU. The company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". The amendments in ASU-04 simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, by removing the second step of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value. The new guidance does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for testing dates after January 1, 2017. The company is evaluating the application of this ASU on the company's annual impairment test. The company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement". The amendments in ASU-13 remove, modify and add various disclosure requirements around the topic in order to clarify and improve the cost-benefit nature of disclosures. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted. The company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20)". The amendments in ASU-14 remove, modify and add various disclosure requirements around the topic in order to clarify and improve the cost-benefit nature of disclosures. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption permitted. The amendments must be applied on a retrospective basis for all periods presented. The company is currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this ASU will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)". The amendments in ASU-15 align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a service contract hosting arrangement with those of developing or obtaining internal-use software. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted. The company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740) which removes certain exceptions related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. This guidance also clarifies and simplifies other areas of ASC 740. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods with those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption permitted. Certain amendments in this update must be applied on a prospective basis, certain amendments must be applied on a retrospective basis, and certain amendments must be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this ASU will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue is recognized when the control of the promised goods or services are transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and represents the unit of account. A contract's transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The company’s contracts can have multiple performance obligations or just a single performance obligation. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the contracts transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation using the company’s best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract.
Within the Commercial Foodservice Equipment and Residential Foodservice Equipment Groups, the estimated standalone selling price of equipment is based on observable prices. Within the Food Processing Equipment Group, the company estimates the standalone selling price based on expected cost to manufacture the good or complete the service plus an appropriate profit margin.
Control may pass to the customer over time or at a point in time. In general, the Commercial Foodservice Equipment and Residential Foodservice Equipment Groups recognize revenue at the point in time control transfers to their customers based on contractual shipping terms. Revenue from equipment sold under our long-term contracts within the Food Processing Equipment group is recognized over time as the equipment is manufactured and assembled. Installation services provided in connection with the delivery of the equipment are also generally recognized as those services are rendered. Over time transfer of control is measured using an appropriate input measure (e.g., costs incurred or direct labor hours incurred in relation to total estimate). These measures include forecasts based on the best information available and therefore reflect the company's judgment to faithfully depict the transfer of the goods.
Contract Estimates
Accounting for long-term contracts within the Food Processing Equipment group involves the use of various techniques to estimate total contract revenue and costs. For the company’s long-term contracts, estimated profit for the equipment performance obligations is recognized as the equipment is manufactured and assembled. Profit on the equipment performance obligations is estimated as the difference between the total estimated revenue and expected costs to complete a contract. Contract cost estimates are based on labor productivity and availability, the complexity of the work to be performed; the cost and availability of materials and labor, and the performance of subcontractors.
Contracts within the Commercial Foodservice and Residential Foodservice Equipment groups may contain variable consideration in the form of volume rebate programs. The company’s estimate of variable consideration is based on its experience with similarly situated customers using the portfolio approach.
Adoption of ASC 606
On December 31, 2017, we adopted the new accounting standard ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) using the modified retrospective method to contracts that were not completed as of December 30, 2017. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of $4.4 million.
As a result of the adoption of ASC 606, the company has changed its accounting policy for revenue recognition as detailed below.
Equipment
Under the company’s historical accounting policies, revenue under long-term sales contracts within the Food Processing Equipment Group was recognized using the percentage of completion method. Upon adoption, a number of contracts that were not completed as of December 31, 2017 did not meet the requirements for recognition of revenue over time under ASC 606. As such the revenue was deferred and recognized at a point in time.
Installation Services
Under the company’s historical accounting policies, the company used the completed contract method for installation services associated with equipment sold within the Food Processing Equipment Group. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue from installation services over the period the services are rendered.
Product Maintenance
These services are generally recognized on a straight-line basis, because the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit as we perform the services.
Practical Expedients and Policy Elections
The company has taken advantage of the following practical expedients:
The company does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less.
The company generally expenses sales commissions when incurred because the amortization period would have been less than one year. These costs are recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses.
As the company’s standard payment terms are less than one year, the company does not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component.
The company has made the following accounting policy elections:
The company treats shipping and handling activities performed after the customer obtains control of the good as a contract fulfillment activity.
Sales, use and value added taxes assessed by governmental authorities are excluded from the measurement of the transaction price within the company’s contracts with its customers.
Disaggregation of Revenue
We disaggregate our net sales by reportable operating segment and geographical location as we believe it best depicts how the nature, timing and uncertainty of our net sales and cash flows are affected by economic factors. In general, the Commercial Foodservice Equipment and Residential Foodservice Equipment Groups recognize revenue at the point in time control transfers to their customers based on contractual shipping terms. Revenue from equipment sold under our long-term contracts within the Food Processing Equipment group is recognized over time as the equipment is manufactured and assembled. The following table summarizes our net sales by reportable operating segment and geographical location (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial Foodservice | | Food Processing | | Residential Kitchen | | Total |
| Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2019 | |
| | |
| | | | |
|
| United States and Canada | $ | 1,334,776 |
| | $ | 246,572 |
| | $ | 362,753 |
| | $ | 1,944,101 |
|
| Asia | 221,422 |
| | 31,250 |
| | 5,760 |
| | 258,432 |
|
| Europe and Middle East | 349,613 |
| | 98,814 |
| | 198,672 |
| | 647,099 |
|
| Latin America | 78,534 |
| | 24,315 |
| | 6,965 |
| | 109,814 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,984,345 |
| | $ | 400,951 |
| | $ | 574,150 |
| | $ | 2,959,446 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Twelve Months Ended December 29, 2018 | | | | | | | |
| United States and Canada | $ | 1,176,006 |
| | $ | 263,743 |
| | $ | 366,679 |
| | $ | 1,806,428 |
|
| Asia | 180,409 |
| | 36,578 |
| | 7,155 |
| | 224,142 |
|
| Europe and Middle East | 315,935 |
| | 64,666 |
| | 221,126 |
| | 601,727 |
|
| Latin America | 57,464 |
| | 24,607 |
| | 8,563 |
| | 90,634 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,729,814 |
| | $ | 389,594 |
| | $ | 603,523 |
| | $ | 2,722,931 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Twelve Months Ended December 30, 2017 | | | | | | | |
| United States and Canada | $ | 968,483 |
| | $ | 256,739 |
| | $ | 344,204 |
| | $ | 1,569,426 |
|
| Asia | 144,702 |
| | 25,175 |
| | 8,099 |
| | 177,976 |
|
| Europe and Middle East | 226,697 |
| | 42,473 |
| | 240,456 |
| | 509,626 |
|
| Latin America | 42,226 |
| | 28,330 |
| | 7,958 |
| | 78,514 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,382,108 |
| | $ | 352,717 |
| | $ | 600,717 |
| | $ | 2,335,542 |
|
Contract Balances
Contract assets primarily relate to the company's right to consideration for work completed but not billed at the reporting date and are recorded in prepaid expenses and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract assets are transferred to receivables when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Accounts receivable are not considered contract assets under the new revenue standard as contract assets are conditioned upon the company's future satisfaction of a performance obligation. Accounts receivable, in contracts, are unconditional rights to consideration.
Contract liabilities relate to advance consideration received from customers for which revenue has not been recognized. Current contract liabilities are recorded in accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Non-current contract liabilities are recorded in other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract liabilities are reduced when the associated revenue from the contract is recognized.
The following table provides information about contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | |
| | December 28, 2019 | | December 29, 2018 |
| Contract assets | $ | 22,675 |
| | $ | 14,048 |
|
| Contract liabilities | $ | 74,511 |
| | $ | 57,913 |
|
| Non-current contract liabilities | $ | 12,870 |
| | $ | 12,170 |
|
During the twelve months period ended December 28, 2019, the company reclassified $9.1 million to accounts receivable which was included in the contract asset balance at the beginning of the period. During the twelve months period ended December 28, 2019, the company recognized revenue of $51.8 million which was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period. Additions to contract liabilities representing amounts billed to clients in excess of revenue recognized to date were $71.4 million during the twelve months period ended December 28, 2019. Substantially all of the company's outstanding performance obligations will be satisfied within 12 to 36 months. There were 0 contract asset impairments during twelve months period ended December 28, 2019.
| |
| (5) | FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS |
The following is a summary of long-term debt at December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016:December 29, 2018 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Senior secured revolving credit line | $ | 1,869,402 |
| | $ | 1,887,764 |
|
| Foreign loans | 3,622 |
| | 4,166 |
|
| Other debt arrangement | 116 |
| | 175 |
|
| Total debt | $ | 1,873,140 |
| | $ | 1,892,105 |
|
| | | | |
| Less current maturities of long-term debt | 2,894 |
| | 3,207 |
|
| | | | |
| Long-term debt | $ | 1,870,246 |
| | $ | 1,888,898 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Senior secured revolving credit line | $ | 725,500 |
| | $ | 733,000 |
|
| Foreign loans | 6,413 |
| | 32,813 |
|
| Other debt arrangement | 213 |
| | 248 |
|
| Total debt | $ | 732,126 |
| | $ | 766,061 |
|
| | | | |
| Less current maturities of long-term debt | 5,883 |
| | 32,059 |
|
| | | | |
| Long-term debt | $ | 726,243 |
| | $ | 734,002 |
|
On July 28, 2016, the company entered into an amended and restated five year $2.5 billion multi-currency senior secured revolving credit agreement (the "Credit Facility"), with. On December 18, 2018, the potential under certain circumstancescompany entered into an amendment to increase the amount of the Credit Facility, increasing the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility by $500.0 million to a total of $3.0 billion. Subsequent to the end of fiscal year December 28, 2019, the company entered into an amended and restated facility ("Amended Facility"). See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for further information. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had $725.5 million$1.9 billion of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, including $701.0 million$1.8 billion of borrowings in U.S. Dollars and $24.5$47.9 million of borrowings denominated in British Pounds.Euro. The company also has $10.2$13.3 million in outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, which reduces the borrowing availability under the Credit Facility. Remaining borrowing availability under this facility was $1.8$1.1 billion at December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, borrowings under the Credit Facility accrued interest at a rate of 1.25%1.625% above LIBOR per annum or 0.25%0.625% above the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and one month LIBOR plus 1.00%. The average interest rate per annum on the debt under the Credit Facility was equal to 2.00% for3.37% at the end of the period. The interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s funded debtless unrestricted cashFunded Debt Less Unrestricted Cash to pro formaPro Forma EBITDA (the "Leverage Ratio") on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment fee based upon the Leverage Ratio is charged on the unused portion of the commitments under the Credit Facility. This variable commitment fee was equal to 0.20%0.25% per annum as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
In addition, the company has other international credit facilities to fund working capital needs outside the United States and the United Kingdom. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, these foreign credit facilities amounted to $6.4$3.6 million in U.S. Dollars with a weighted average per annum interest rate of approximately 10.21%5.18%.
The company’s debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost. The company believes its interest rate margins on its existing debt are consistent with current market conditions and, therefore, the carrying value of debt reflects the fair value. The interest rate margin is based on the company's Leverage Ratio.
The company estimated the fair value of its loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume the company’s obligations. The upfront cash payment is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend to achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the cash outflows under the company’s senior secured revolving credit facility assuming the facility was outstanding in its entirety until maturity. Since the company maintains its borrowings under a revolving credit facility and there is no predetermined borrowing or repayment schedule, for purposes of this calculation the company calculated the fair value of its obligations assuming the current amount of debt at the end of the period was outstanding until the maturity of the company’s Credit Facility in July 2021.January 2025. Although borrowings could be materially greater or less than the current amount of borrowings outstanding at the end of the period, it is not practical to estimate the amounts that may be outstanding during future periods. The carrying value and estimated aggregate fair value, a level 2 measurement, based primarily on market prices, of debt is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 28, 2019 | | December 29, 2018 |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
| Total debt | $ | 1,873,140 |
| | $ | 1,873,140 |
| | $ | 1,892,105 |
| | $ | 1,892,105 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | January 2, 2016 |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
| Total debt | $ | 732,126 |
| | $ | 732,126 |
| | $ | 766,061 |
| | $ | 766,061 |
|
The company uses floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements to hedge variable interest rate risk associated with the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company had outstanding floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps totaling $135.0$51.0 million notional amount carrying an average interest rate of 0.91%1.27% maturing in less than 12 months and $324.0$897.0 million of notional amount carrying an average interest rate of 1.30%2.27% that mature in more than 12 months but less than 8472 months.
The terms of the CreditAmended Facility limit the ability of the company and its subsidiaries to, with certain exceptions: incur indebtedness; grant liens; engage in certain mergers, consolidations, acquisitions and dispositions; make restricted payments; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and requires, among other things, the company to satisfy certain financial covenants: (i) a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the CreditAmended Facility) of 3.00 to 1.00 and (ii) a maximum Leverage Ratio of Funded DebtlessDebt less Unrestricted Cash to Pro Forma EBITDA (each as defined in the CreditAmended Facility) of 3.504.00 to 1.00, which may be adjusted to 4.004.50 to 1.00 for a four consecutive fiscal quarter period in connection with certain qualified acquisitions, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the CreditAmended Facility. The CreditAmended Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of Middleby Marshall, the company and the company's domestic subsidiaries and is unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, the company and certain of the company's direct and indirect material foreign and domestic subsidiaries. The CreditAmended Facility contains certain customary events of default, including, but not limited to, the failure to make required payments; bankruptcy and other insolvency events; the failure to perform certain covenants; the material breach of a representation or warranty; non-payment of certain other indebtedness; the entry of undischarged judgments against the company or any subsidiary for the payment of material uninsured amounts; the invalidity of the company guarantee or any subsidiary guaranty; and a change of control of the company. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing agreements.
The aggregate amount of debt payable during each of the next five years, which includes the amendment and restatement to our multi-currency senior secured credit agreement disclosed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, is as follows:follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2020 | $ | 2,894 |
|
| 2021 | 378 |
|
| 2022 | 302 |
|
| 2023 | 82 |
|
| 2024 and thereafter | 1,869,484 |
|
| | |
|
| | $ | 1,873,140 |
|
|
| | | |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| 2017 | $ | 5,883 |
|
| 2018 | 292 |
|
| 2019 | 113 |
|
| 2020 | 113 |
|
| 2021 and thereafter | 725,725 |
|
| | |
|
| | $ | 732,126 |
|
(5)
(6) COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK
(a) Shares Authorized and Issued
At December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the company had 95,000,000 authorized shares of common stock and 2,000,000 authorized shares of non-voting preferred stock authorized. At December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, there were 57,539,766 and 57,306,082, respectively, shares of common stock outstanding.stock.
(b) Treasury Stock
In July 1998,November 2017, the company's Board of Directors adoptedapproved a stock repurchase program and during 1998 authorizedauthorizing the purchasecompany to repurchase in the aggregate up to 2,500,000 shares of its outstanding common shares in open market purchases. During 2013, the company's Board of Directors authorized the purchase of additional common shares in open market purchases.stock. As of December 28, 2013, the total number of shares authorized for repurchase under the program is 4,570,266. As of December 31, 2016, 2,003,5042019, 126,200 shares had been purchased under the 19982017 stock repurchase program and 2,566,7622,373,800 remain authorized for repurchase.
At December 31, 2016, the company had a total of 4,905,549 shares in treasury amounting to $205.3 million.
(c) Share-Based Awards
The company maintains several stock incentive plans under which the company's Board of Directors issues stock options and makes restricted share grants to key employees. Stock options issued under the plans provided key employees with rights to purchase shares of common stock at specified exercise prices. Options were exercised upon certain vesting requirements being met, but expired to the extent unexercised within a maximum of ten years from the date of grant. Restricted share grants issued to employees are transferable upon certain vesting requirements being met.
2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan"), as amended on May 7, 2009. Effective August 11, 2011 and in accordance with plan parameters, the company is no longer permitted to make grants under the 2007 Plan. Accordingly, zero additional shares are available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.
As of December 31, 2016, a total of 2,683,554 share-based awards have been issued under the 2007 Plan. This includes 2,672,667 restricted share grants, all of which have vested. This also includes 10,887 stock options, of which 2,124 have been exercised, 7,791 have been forfeited and zero remain outstanding.
The 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2011 Plan"), was adopted on April 1, 2011, under which the company's Board of Directors issues stock grants to key employees. On July 11, 2017 the company increased the maximum amount of shares reserved for issuance under the 2011 Plan by 1,000,000. A maximum amount of 1,650,0002,650,000 shares can be issued under the 2011 Plan. Stock grants issued to employees are transferable upon certain vesting requirements.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, a total of 852,6361,652,175 share-based awards have been issued under the 2011 Plan. This includes 852,6361,652,175 restricted share grants, of which 616,125527,085 remain outstanding and unvested. For fiscal year ended December 28, 2019, the approximate fair value of shares vested were $16.5 million.
A summary of the company’s nonvested restricted share grant activity for fiscal years ended December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares |
| | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
| Nonvested shares at December 30, 2017 | 159,203 |
| | $ | 104.44 |
|
| | | | |
| Granted | 132,038 |
| | 100.50 |
|
| Vested | (6,203 | ) | | 126.09 |
|
| Forfeited | (159,196 | ) | | 100.84 |
|
| | | | |
| Nonvested shares at December 29, 2018 | 125,842 |
| | $ | 103.29 |
|
| | | | |
| Granted | 537,059 |
| | 113.26 |
|
| Vested | (135,816 | ) | | 105.81 |
|
| Forfeited | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | |
| Nonvested shares at December 28, 2019 | 527,085 |
| | $ | 112.60 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares |
| | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
| Nonvested shares at January 3, 2015 | 386,607 |
| | $ | 85.25 |
|
| | | | |
| Granted | 100,704 |
| | 107.81 |
|
| Vested | (125,457 | ) | | 83.93 |
|
| Forfeited | (20,950 | ) | | 80.29 |
|
| | | | |
| Nonvested shares at January 2, 2016 | 340,904 |
| | $ | 94.86 |
|
| | | | |
| Granted | 382,125 |
| | 94.19 |
|
| Vested | (100,511 | ) | | 102.57 |
|
| Forfeited | (6,393 | ) | | 107.81 |
|
| | | | |
| Nonvested shares at December 31, 2016 | 616,125 |
| | $ | 91.76 |
|
(7) INCOME TAXES
Earnings before taxes is summarized as follows:follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Domestic | $ | 336,688 |
| | $ | 328,870 |
| | $ | 290,866 |
|
| Foreign | 125,931 |
| | 94,643 |
| | 92,663 |
|
| Total | $ | 462,619 |
| | $ | 423,513 |
| | $ | 383,529 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Domestic | $ | 336,625 |
| | $ | 266,831 |
| | $ | 240,936 |
|
| Foreign | 84,680 |
| | 14,336 |
| | 39,854 |
|
| Total | $ | 421,305 |
| | $ | 281,167 |
| | $ | 280,790 |
|
The provision for income taxes is summarized as follows:follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Federal | $ | 69,074 |
| | $ | 66,359 |
| | $ | 48,688 |
|
| State and local | 16,203 |
| | 16,035 |
| | 9,076 |
|
| Foreign | 25,102 |
| | 23,967 |
| | 27,637 |
|
| Total | $ | 110,379 |
| | $ | 106,361 |
| | $ | 85,401 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Current | $ | 88,167 |
| | $ | 85,872 |
| | $ | 99,893 |
|
| Deferred | 22,212 |
| | 20,489 |
| | (14,492 | ) |
| Total | $ | 110,379 |
| | $ | 106,361 |
| | $ | 85,401 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Federal | $ | 94,621 |
| | $ | 78,617 |
| | $ | 69,536 |
|
| State and local | 13,107 |
| | 9,515 |
| | 9,316 |
|
| Foreign | 29,361 |
| | 1,425 |
| | 8,626 |
|
| Total | $ | 137,089 |
| | $ | 89,557 |
| | $ | 87,478 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Current | $ | 115,726 |
| | $ | 87,638 |
| | $ | 72,137 |
|
| Deferred | 21,363 |
| | 1,919 |
| | 15,341 |
|
| Total | $ | 137,089 |
| | $ | 89,557 |
| | $ | 87,478 |
|
Reconciliation of the differences between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate to the effective rate are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| U.S. federal statutory tax rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
| State taxes, net of federal benefit | 3.2 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 1.5 |
|
| U.S. domestic manufacturers deduction | — |
| | — |
| | (2.1 | ) |
| Permanent differences | 0.6 |
| | 0.2 |
| | (0.7 | ) |
| Foreign income tax rate at rates other than U.S. statutory | 0.2 |
| | 1.3 |
| | (1.6 | ) |
| Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 deferred tax changes | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | (10.0 | ) |
| Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 transition tax | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 2.0 |
|
Change in valuation allowances (1) | 0.1 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
| Tax on unremitted earnings | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 1.5 |
|
| Other | (1.5 | ) | | — |
| | (1.3 | ) |
| Consolidated effective tax | 23.9 | % | | 25.1 | % | | 22.3 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| U.S. federal statutory tax rate | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
| State taxes, net of federal benefit | 2.3 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| U.S. domestic manufacturers deduction | (2.4 | ) | | (2.6 | ) | | (2.3 | ) |
| Permanent book vs. tax differences | (1.6 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
| Foreign tax rate differentials | (1.1 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | (1.9 | ) |
| Reserve adjustments and other | 0.3 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Consolidated effective tax | 32.5 | % | | 31.9 | % | | 31.2 | % |
The company’s effective tax rate for 2019 was 23.9% as compared to 25.1% in 2018. The effective tax rate for 2019 reflects favorable tax adjustments for a refund of foreign taxes, enacted tax rate changes in several foreign jurisdictions and adjustments for the finalization of 2018 tax returns. The effective tax rate is higher than the federal tax rate of 21.0% primarily due to state taxes, non-deductible expenses and foreign tax rate differentials.
At December 31, 201628, 2019 and January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the company had recorded the following deferred tax assets and liabilities:liabilities (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Deferred tax assets: | |
| | |
|
| Compensation related | $ | 4,744 |
| | $ | 3,776 |
|
| Pension and post-retirement benefits | 48,716 |
| | 41,502 |
|
| Inventory reserves | 15,166 |
| | 14,441 |
|
| Accrued liabilities and reserves | 17,321 |
| | 13,835 |
|
| Warranty reserves | 16,550 |
| | 10,641 |
|
| Operating lease liability | 17,521 |
| | — |
|
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 17,873 |
| | 36,629 |
|
| Other | 22,579 |
| | 10,531 |
|
| Gross deferred tax assets | 160,470 |
| | 131,355 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (7,754 | ) | | (26,023 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets | $ | 152,716 |
| | $ | 105,332 |
|
| | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |
| | |
|
| Intangible assets | $ | (203,721 | ) | | $ | (167,197 | ) |
| Depreciable assets | (18,020 | ) | | (13,617 | ) |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | (17,542 | ) | | — |
|
| Other | (10,001 | ) | | (6,226 | ) |
| | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | $ | (249,284 | ) | | $ | (187,040 | ) |
| | | | |
| Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | $ | (96,568 | ) | | $ | (81,708 | ) |
| | | | |
| Long-term deferred asset | 36,932 |
| | 32,188 |
|
| Long-term deferred liability | (133,500 | ) | | (113,896 | ) |
| Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | $ | (96,568 | ) | | $ | (81,708 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| Deferred tax assets: | |
| | |
|
| Federal net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 16,951 |
| | $ | 13,416 |
|
| Compensation related | 25,650 |
| | 19,160 |
|
| Accrued retirement benefits | 60,986 |
| | 43,930 |
|
| Inventory reserves | 9,275 |
| | 8,183 |
|
| Product liability and workers compensation reserves | 4,550 |
| | 5,811 |
|
| Warranty reserves | 10,141 |
| | 9,252 |
|
| Receivable related reserves | 3,376 |
| | 3,069 |
|
| UNICAP | 5,104 |
| | 3,520 |
|
| State net operating loss carryforwards | 1,923 |
| | 1,483 |
|
| Foreign net operating loss carryforwards | 16,717 |
| | 17,549 |
|
| Other | 37,822 |
| | 32,347 |
|
| Gross deferred tax assets | 192,495 |
| | 157,720 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (29,893 | ) | | (20,395 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets | $ | 162,602 |
| | $ | 137,325 |
|
| | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |
| | |
|
| Intangible assets | $ | (173,673 | ) | | $ | (182,471 | ) |
| Foreign tax earnings repatriation | (1,178 | ) | | (1,363 | ) |
| Depreciation | (2,957 | ) | | (551 | ) |
| Interest rate swap | (3,655 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Other | (7,200 | ) | | (2,783 | ) |
| | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | $ | (188,663 | ) | | $ | (187,174 | ) |
| | | | |
| Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | $ | (26,061 | ) | | $ | (49,849 | ) |
| | | | |
| Current deferred asset | $ | — |
| | $ | 51,723 |
|
| Long-term deferred asset | 51,699 |
| | 11,438 |
|
| Long-term deferred liability | (77,760 | ) | | (113,010 | ) |
| Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | $ | (26,061 | ) | | $ | (49,849 | ) |
The company doeshas recorded tax reserves on undistributed foreign earnings not providepermanently reinvested of $5.6 million and $4.1 million at December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. No further provisions were made for deferredincome taxes and foreign withholding taxes on the remainingthat may result from future remittances of undistributed earnings of certain internationalforeign subsidiaries of approximately $157.4that are determined to be permanently reinvested, which were $369.0 million and $104.5 million as of on December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively, as these earnings are considered permanently invested. Upon repatriation of these earnings to the U.S. in the form of dividends or otherwise, the company may be subject to U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. The actual U.S. tax cost would depend on income tax laws and circumstances at the time of distribution.28, 2019. Determination of the related tax liabilitytotal amount of unrecognized deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings net of foreign subsidiaries is not practicable because of the complexities associated with the hypothetical calculation.practicable.
As of December 31, 2016, theThe company has U.S. federal and foreign incomea deferred tax asset on net operating loss carryforwards totaling $17.9 million as of approximately $48.4 million and $63.3 million, respectively. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates beginning 2024 through 2036. The foreignDecember 28, 2019. These net operating losses are available to reduce future taxable earnings of certain domestic and foreign subsidiaries. United States federal loss carryforwards total $19.5 million of which $13.4 million will expire through 2037 and $6.1 million have no expiration period. Certain ofdate. State loss carryforwards total $104.4 million and expire through 2039 and international loss carryforwards total $38.2 million and expire through 2038; however, some have no expiration date. Of these carryforwards, $5.2 million are subject to limitations on use due to tax rules affecting acquired tax attributes, loss sharing between group members, and business profitability, and thereforefull valuation allowance. During 2019, the company has established tax-effected valuation allowances against these tax benefits.
The valuation allowances that the company has provided against thewrote off $18.4 million of deferred tax assets amount to $29.9 million and primarily relate to the acquisition of AGA in 2015.on foreign loss carryforwards that had full valuation allowances. The company will continue to maintain a valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets until such timewere written off as in management’s judgment, considering all available positive and negative evidence, the company determines that these deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable.entities were dissolved or otherwise disposed of during 2019.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the total amount of liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal, state and foreign taxes was approximately 20.3$31.6 million (of which $20.031.2 million would impact the effective tax rate if recognized) plus approximately $2.75.5 million of accrued interest and $4.97.2 million of penalties. The company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Interest recognized in fiscal years 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $0.30.4 million, $0.30.6 million and $(0.3)0.7 million, respectively. Penalties recognized in fiscal years 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $1.0(0.9) million, $0.80.6 million and $1.11.3 million, respectively.
Although the company believes its tax returns are correct, the final determination of tax examinations may be different than what was reported on the tax returns. In the opinion of management, adequate tax provisions have been made for the years subject to examination.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2015, January 2, 2016December 30, 2017, December 29, 2018 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in28, 2019 (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| Balance at December 30, 2017 | $ | 29,930 |
|
| | |
|
| Increases to current year tax positions | 3,912 |
|
| Increase to prior year tax positions | 2,860 |
|
| Decrease to prior year tax positions | (569 | ) |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | (4,221 | ) |
| | |
|
| Balance at December 29, 2018 | $ | 31,912 |
|
| | |
|
| Increases to current year tax positions | 4,216 |
|
| Increase to prior year tax positions | 254 |
|
| Lapse of statute of limitations | (4,823 | ) |
| | |
| Balance at December 28, 2019 | $ | 31,559 |
|
|
| | | |
| Balance at January 3, 2015 | $ | 12,474 |
|
| | |
|
| Increases to current year tax positions | 3,089 |
|
| Increase to prior year tax positions | 116 |
|
| Decrease to prior year tax positions | (755 | ) |
| Settlements | — |
|
| Lapse of statute of limitations | (505 | ) |
| | |
|
| Balance at January 2, 2016 | $ | 14,419 |
|
| | |
|
| Increases to current year tax positions | 6,367 |
|
| Increase to prior year tax positions | 601 |
|
| Decrease to prior year tax positions | (233 | ) |
| Settlements | — |
|
| Lapse of statute of limitations | (865 | ) |
| | |
| Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 20,289 |
|
The company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions; both within the United States and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities. The company remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations expires for the respective tax jurisdiction. Within specific countries, the company and its operating subsidiaries may be subject to audit by various tax authorities and may be subject to different statute of limitations expiration dates.
It is reasonably possible that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits associated with state, federal and foreign tax positions may decrease over the next twelve months due to expiration of a statute or completion of an audit. The company believes that it is reasonably possible that $2.0$5.3 million of its remaining unrecognized tax benefits may be recognized by the end of 20172020 as a result of settlements with taxing authorities or lapses of statutes of limitations.
A summaryIn the normal course of business, income tax authorities in various income tax jurisdictions both in the United States and internationally conduct routine audits of our income tax returns filed in prior years. These audits are generally designed to determine if individual income tax authorities are in agreement with our interpretations of complex tax regulations regarding the allocation of income to the various income tax jurisdictions. Income tax years that remain subject to examination inare open from 2016 through the company’scurrent year for the United States federal jurisdiction. Income tax years open for our other major tax jurisdictions are:range from 2014 through the current year.
|
| |
United States – federal | 2012 – 2016 |
United States – states | 2007 – 2016 |
Australia | 2012 – 2016 |
Brazil | 2012 – 2016 |
Canada | 2007 – 2016 |
China | 2007 – 2016 |
Czech Republic | 2014 – 2016 |
Denmark | 2013 – 2016 |
France | 2014 – 2016 |
Germany | 2014 – 2016 |
India | 2013 – 2016 |
Ireland | 2010 – 2016 |
Italy | 2012 – 2016 |
Luxembourg | 2012 – 2016 |
Mexico | 2011 – 2016 |
Netherlands | 2005 – 2016 |
Philippines | 2013 – 2016 |
Poland | 2011 – 2016 |
Romania | 2007 – 2016 |
South Korea | 2011 |
Spain | 2012 – 2016 |
Sweden | 2010 – 2016 |
Switzerland | 2008 – 2016 |
Taiwan | 2011 – 2012 |
United Kingdom | 2015 – 2016 |
| |
(7)(8) | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must be adjusted to fair value in earnings. If thea derivative does qualify as a hedge under ASC 815, changes in the fair value will either be offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments or recognized in other accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The
On December 30, 2018, the company adopted the new accounting standard ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" using the modified retrospective method. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-12, the ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair value will be immediatelywas recognized in earnings. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-12, the company no longer recognizes hedge ineffectiveness in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, but instead recognizes the entire change in the fair value of the hedge contract in other accumulated comprehensive income.
The company periodically enters into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The fair value of these forward contracts was aan unrealized gainloss of $0.3$0.9 million at the end of the year.
The company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and all changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2016, theThe fair value of these instruments was a liability of $23.3 million and an asset of $8.7$9.4 million. as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. The change in fair value of these swap agreements in 20162019 was a gainloss of $5.424.1 million, net of taxes.
A summary of the company’s interest rate swaps is as follows:
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Twelve Months Ended |
| | Location | | Dec 28, 2019 |
| | Dec 29, 2018 |
|
| Fair value | Other assets | | $ | 1,830 |
| | $ | 13,487 |
|
| Fair value | Other non-current liabilities | | $ | 25,120 |
| | $ | 4,125 |
|
| Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in other comprehensive income | Other comprehensive income | | $ | (31,396 | ) | | $ | (561 | ) |
| Gain/(loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (effective portion) | Interest expense | | $ | 1,256 |
| | $ | 415 |
|
| Gain/(loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion) | Other expense | | $ | — |
| | $ | 72 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Twelve Months Ended |
| | Location | | Dec 31, 2016 |
| | Jan 2, 2016 |
|
| | | | (dollars in thousands) |
| Fair value | Other assets | | $ | 8,842 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Fair value | Other liabilities | | $ | (100 | ) | | $ | (412 | ) |
| Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in other comprehensive income | Other comprehensive income | | $ | 7,892 |
| | $ | (1,502 | ) |
| Gain/(loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (effective portion) | Interest expense | | $ | (1,230 | ) | | $ | (1,909 | ) |
| Gain/(loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion) | Other expense | | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | 9 |
|
Interest rate swaps are subject to default risk to the extent the counterparty is unable to satisfy its settlement obligations under the interest rate swap agreements. The company reviews the credit profile of the financial institutions that are counterparties to such swap agreements and assesses their creditworthiness prior to entering into the interest rate swap agreements and throughout the term. The interest rate swap agreements typically contain provisions that allow the counterparty to require early settlement in the event that the company becomes insolvent or is unable to maintain compliance with its covenants under its existing debt agreement.
Accounting Policy
On December 30, 2018, the company adopted the new accounting standard ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases"(ASC 842) using the modified retrospective method and elected to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition. The company has elected the package of practical expedients to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs.
The adoption of ASC 842 represents a change in accounting principle that changes the way all leases with a duration of one year or more are treated. Under this guidance, lessees are required to capitalize virtually all leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and an associated financing lease liability or operating lease liability. The company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception of a contract. Additionally, the guidance requires additional disclosure to enable users of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
The most material impact of the new standard is the recognition of new right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for operating leases. Operating lease ROU assets are included in other assets and operating lease liabilities are included accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities. The lease liabilities are measured based upon the present value of minimum future payments and the ROU assets to be recognized will be equal to lease liabilities, adjusted for prepaid and accrued rent balances.
Leases
The company leases warehouse space, office facilities and equipment under operating leases. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. The company's lease terms include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for these leases which expireis recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The company has operating lease costs of $31.0 million, $30.2 million and $27.1 million in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively, including short-term lease expense and thereafter. Futurevariable lease costs, which were immaterial in the year.
Rent expense under the company's operating leases during fiscal 2018 and 2017, prior to the company's adoption of ASC 842, was $30.2 million and $27.1 million, respectively. The company's future minimum paymentlease obligations under these leases are as follows:
|
| | | |
| | Total Operating Lease Commitments |
|
| | |
| 2017 | $ | 24,669 |
|
| 2018 | 20,499 |
|
| 2019 | 17,245 |
|
| 2020 | 13,953 |
|
| 2021 | 12,008 |
|
| 2022 and thereafter | 26,342 |
|
| | |
| | $ | 114,716 |
|
Rental expense pertaining to thenon-cancelable operating leases was $23.5 million, $17.6 million and $14.9 million in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively.as of December 29, 2018 were comparable to those as of December 28, 2019.
|
| | | |
| Leases (in thousands) | December 28, 2019 |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | $ | 96,655 |
|
| | |
| Operating Lease Liability: | |
| Current | 21,827 |
|
| Non-current | 75,018 |
|
| Total Liability | $ | 96,845 |
|
|
| | | |
| Total Lease Commitments (in thousands) | Operating Leases |
| 2020 | $ | 24,563 |
|
| 2021 | 21,424 |
|
| 2022 | 17,875 |
|
| 2023 | 12,742 |
|
| 2024 | 10,134 |
|
| 2025 and thereafter | 25,514 |
|
| Total future lease commitments | 112,252 |
|
| Less imputed interest | 15,407 |
|
| Total | $ | 96,845 |
|
|
| | | |
| Other Lease Information (in thousands, except lease term and discount rate) | Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2019 |
| Supplemental cash flow information | |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |
| Operating cash flows for operating leases | $ | 24,794 |
|
| | |
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | |
| Operating leases | 25,306 |
|
| | |
| | December 28, 2019 |
| | |
| Weighted-average remaining lease terms leases - Operating | 6.3 years |
|
| | |
| Weighted-average discount rate - Operating | 3.4 | % |
(10) SEGMENT INFORMATION
The company operates in three3 reportable operating segments defined by management reporting structure and operating activities.
The Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group manufactures, sells, and distributes foodservice equipment for the restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business segment has manufacturing facilities in Arkansas, California, Illinois, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington, Australia, China, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, the Philippines, Spain, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Principal product lines of this group include conveyor ovens, ranges, steamers,combi-ovens, convection ovens, combi-ovens, broilers andbaking ovens, proofing ovens, deck ovens, speed cooking ovens, hydrovection ovens, ranges, fryers, rethermalizers, steam cooking equipment, induction cooking systems, baking and proofing ovens, charbroilers, catering equipment, fryers, toasters, hot food servers, food warming equipment, catering equipment, heated cabinets, charbroilers, ventless cooking systems, kitchen ventilation, induction cooking equipment, countertop cooking equipment, toasters, griddles, charcoal grills, professional mixers, stainless steel fabrication, custom millwork, professional refrigerators, blast chillers, coldrooms, ice machines, freezers, soft serve ice cream equipment, coffee and beverage dispensing equipment, home and professional refrigerators, coldrooms, ice machines, freezerscraft brewing equipment and kitchen processing and ventilation equipment.IoT solutions. These products are sold and marketed under the brand names: Anets, APW Wyott, Bakers Pride, Beech, BKI, Blodgett, Blodgett Combi, Blodgett Range, Bloomfield, Britannia, CTX, Carter-Hoffmann, Celfrost, Concordia, CookTek, Crown, CTX, Desmon, Doyon, Eswood, EVO, Firex, Follett, Frifri, Giga, Globe, Goldstein, Holman, Houno, IMC, Induc, Jade, JoeTap, Josper, L2F, Lang, Lincat, MagiKitch’n, Market Forge, Marsal, Middleby Marshall, MPC, Nieco, Nu-Vu, PerfectFry, Pitco, Powerhouse Dynamics, QualServ, Southbend, Ss Brewtech, Star, Starline, Sveba Dahlen, Synesso, Taylor, Toastmaster, TurboChef, Ultrafryer, Varimixer, Wells and Wunder-Bar.
The Food Processing Equipment Group manufactures preparation, cooking, packaging food handling and food safety equipment for the food processing industry. This business segment has manufacturing operations in Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Principal product lines of this group include batch ovens, baking ovens, proofing ovens, conveyor belt ovens, continuous processing ovens, frying systems and automated thermal processing systems, grinders, slicers, reduction and emulsion systems, mixers, blenders, battering equipment, breading equipment, seeding equipment, water cutting systems, food presses, food suspension equipment, filling and depositing solutions, forming equipment, automated loading and unloading systems, meat presses, breading, battering, mixing, water cutting systems, forming, grindingfood safety, food handling, freezing, defrosting and slicing equipment, food suspension, reduction and emulsion systems, defrosting equipment, packaging and food safety equipment. These products are sold and marketed under the brand names: Alkar, Armor Inox, Auto-Bake, Baker Thermal Solutions, Burford, Cozzini, CVP Systems, Danfotech, Drake, Emico, Glimek, Hinds-Bock, Maurer-Atmos, MP Equipment, M-TEK, Pacproinc, RapidPak, Scanico, Spooner Vicars, Stewart Systems, Thurne and Thurne.Ve.Ma.C.
The Residential Kitchen Equipment Group manufactures, sells and distributes kitchen equipment for the residential market. This business segment has manufacturing facilities in California, Michigan, Mississippi, Wisconsin, France, Ireland Romania and the United Kingdom. Principal product lines of this group are ranges, cookers, stoves, ovens, refrigerators, dishwashers, microwaves, cooktops, wine coolers, ice machines, ventilation equipment and outdoor equipment. These products are sold and marketed under the brand names: Brigade, Falcon,AGA, AGA Cookshop, Brava, EVO, Fired Earth, Grange, Heartland, La Cornue, Leisure Sinks, Lynx, Marvel, Mercury, Rangemaster, Rayburn, Redfyre, Sedona, Stanley, TurboChef, U-Line and Viking.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The chief operating decision maker evaluates individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes that intersegment sales are made at established arm's length transfer prices.
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the company’s business segments(1)1) (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial Foodservice |
| | Food Processing |
| | Residential Kitchen |
| | Corporate and Other(3) |
| | Total |
|
| 2016 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Net sales | $ | 1,266,955 |
| | $ | 342,235 |
| | $ | 658,662 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,267,852 |
|
| Operating income | 350,315 |
| | 87,039 |
| | 89,435 |
| | (80,564 | ) | | 446,225 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 19,548 |
| | 5,696 |
| | 29,897 |
| | 3,093 |
| | 58,234 |
|
| Net capital expenditures | 11,958 |
| | 5,667 |
| | 6,961 |
| | 231 |
| | 24,817 |
|
| Total assets | 1,347,441 |
| | 340,088 |
| | 1,179,640 |
| | 49,967 |
| | 2,917,136 |
|
| Long-lived assets(2) | 84,475 |
| | 21,763 |
| | 175,206 |
| | 35,100 |
| | 316,544 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Net sales | $ | 1,121,046 |
| | $ | 297,712 |
| | $ | 407,840 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,826,598 |
|
| Operating income | 296,061 |
| | 64,650 |
| | 4,653 |
| | (62,761 | ) | | 302,603 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 17,117 |
| | 5,839 |
| | 29,515 |
| | 1,603 |
| | 54,074 |
|
| Net capital expenditures | 12,123 |
| | 2,164 |
| | 7,935 |
| | 140 |
| | 22,362 |
|
| Total assets | 1,115,840 |
| | 308,677 |
| | 1,250,503 |
| | 86,131 |
| | 2,761,151 |
|
| Long-lived assets(2) | 61,835 |
| | 20,307 |
| | 129,751 |
| | 21,327 |
| | 233,220 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Net sales | $ | 1,041,228 |
| | $ | 322,783 |
| | $ | 272,527 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,636,538 |
|
| Operating income | 269,559 |
| | 67,395 |
| | 14,585 |
| | (51,107 | ) | | 300,432 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 19,661 |
| | 6,601 |
| | 13,356 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 41,252 |
|
| Net capital expenditures | 6,752 |
| | 4,487 |
| | 1,811 |
| | 93 |
| | 13,143 |
|
| Total assets | 1,053,921 |
| | 304,241 |
| | 636,680 |
| | 71,289 |
| | 2,066,131 |
|
| Long-lived assets(2) | 50,211 |
| | 19,627 |
| | 71,500 |
| | 10,140 |
| | 151,478 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial Foodservice |
| | Food Processing |
| | Residential Kitchen |
| | Corporate and Other(2) |
| | Total |
|
| 2019 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Net sales | $ | 1,984,345 |
| | $ | 400,951 |
| | $ | 574,150 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,959,446 |
|
Operating income (3,4) | 429,946 |
| | 68,935 |
| | 89,312 |
| | (74,150 | ) | | 514,043 |
|
| Depreciation expense | 21,054 |
| | 4,944 |
| | 11,742 |
| | 112 |
| | 37,852 |
|
Amortization expense (5) | 45,906 |
| | 8,162 |
| | 9,896 |
| | 1,612 |
| | 65,576 |
|
| Net capital expenditures | 29,353 |
| | 6,683 |
| | 9,168 |
| | 1,405 |
| | 46,609 |
|
| Total assets | 3,188,304 |
| | 621,619 |
| | 1,157,211 |
| | 35,009 |
| | 5,002,143 |
|
Long-lived assets (6) | 261,466 |
| | 57,403 |
| | 176,834 |
| | 4,116 |
| | 499,819 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Net sales | $ | 1,729,814 |
| | $ | 389,594 |
| | $ | 603,523 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,722,931 |
|
Operating income (3) | 393,380 |
| | 62,435 |
| | 53,959 |
| | (63,808 | ) | | 445,966 |
|
| Depreciation expense | 17,374 |
| | 5,207 |
| | 12,838 |
| | 363 |
| | 35,782 |
|
Amortization expense (5) | 35,224 |
| | 7,527 |
| | 17,226 |
| | 1,479 |
| | 61,456 |
|
| Net capital expenditures | 17,444 |
| | 7,373 |
| | 11,721 |
| | (498 | ) | | 36,040 |
|
| Total assets | 2,906,373 |
| | 513,189 |
| | 1,089,103 |
| | 41,116 |
| | 4,549,781 |
|
Long-lived assets (6) | 181,636 |
| | 33,127 |
| | 146,897 |
| | 22,328 |
| | 383,988 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2017 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Net sales | $ | 1,382,108 |
| | $ | 352,717 |
| | $ | 600,717 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,335,542 |
|
Operating income (3,7,8) | 357,085 |
| | 88,121 |
| | (377 | ) | | (66,216 | ) | | 378,613 |
|
| Depreciation expense | 12,643 |
| | 3,677 |
| | 12,984 |
| | 406 |
| | 29,710 |
|
Amortization expense (5) | 17,338 |
| | 3,680 |
| | 17,567 |
| | 1,479 |
| | 40,064 |
|
| Net capital expenditures | 41,457 |
| | 5,519 |
| | 7,637 |
| | (120 | ) | | 54,493 |
|
| Total assets | 1,693,820 |
| | 450,932 |
| | 1,140,668 |
| | 54,293 |
| | 3,339,713 |
|
Long-lived assets (6) | 148,565 |
| | 25,346 |
| | 167,486 |
| | 21,191 |
| | 362,588 |
|
| |
| (1) | Non-operating expenses are not allocated to the reportable segments. Non-operating expenses consist of interest expense and deferred financing amortization, foreign exchange gains and losses and other income and expense items outside of income from operations. |
| |
| (2) | Includes corporate and other general company assets and operations. |
| |
| (3) | Restructuring expenses are included in operating income of the segment to which they pertain. See note 13 for further details. |
| |
| (4) | Gain on litigation settlement is included in Residential Kitchen. |
| |
| (5) | Includes amortization of deferred financing costs. |
| |
| (6) | Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment, long-term deferred tax assets and other assets. |
| |
(3)(7) | Includes corporate and other general companyGain on sale of plant is included in Commercial Foodservice. |
| |
| (8) | Impairment of intangible assets and operations.is included in Residential Kitchen. |
Geographic Information
Long-lived assets, not including goodwill and other intangibles (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| United States and Canada | $ | 305,207 |
| | $ | 262,482 |
| | $ | 221,479 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Asia | 22,312 |
| | 12,136 |
| | 14,033 |
|
| Europe and Middle East | 165,781 |
| | 108,001 |
| | 126,264 |
|
| Latin America | 6,519 |
| | 1,369 |
| | 812 |
|
| Total International | 194,612 |
| | 121,506 |
| | 141,109 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 499,819 |
| | $ | 383,988 |
| | $ | 362,588 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| United States and Canada | $ | 181,317 |
| | $ | 149,299 |
| | $ | 127,308 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Asia | 14,729 |
| | 17,336 |
| | 5,714 |
|
| Europe and Middle East | 119,511 |
| | 65,581 |
| | 16,739 |
|
| Latin America | 987 |
| | 1,004 |
| | 1,717 |
|
| Total international | 135,227 |
| | 83,921 |
| | 24,170 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 316,544 |
| | $ | 233,220 |
| | $ | 151,478 |
|
Net sales (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
| United States and Canada | $ | 1,470,566 |
| | $ | 1,274,907 |
| | $ | 1,139,034 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Asia | 190,548 |
| | 165,541 |
| | 171,995 |
|
| Europe and Middle East | 522,819 |
| | 319,387 |
| | 222,974 |
|
| Latin America | 83,919 |
| | 66,763 |
| | 102,535 |
|
| Total international | 797,286 |
| | 551,691 |
| | 497,504 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,267,852 |
| | $ | 1,826,598 |
| | $ | 1,636,538 |
|
(10)(11) EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS
(a)Pension Plans
U.S. Plans:
The company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based upon retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit plan was frozen on April 30, 2002, and no further benefits accrue to the participants beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement age.
The company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its employees at the Smithville, Tennessee facility, which was acquired as part of the Star acquisition. Benefits are determined based upon retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit plan was frozen on April 1, 2008, and no further benefits accrue to the participants beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments for benefits earned on or prior to April 1, 2008 upon reaching retirement age.
The company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its former Chairman ("Chairman Plan"). The retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base salary using a weighted average rate ofwith no increase in future compensation levels of 10.0%.compensation.
Non-U.S. Plans:
The company maintains a defined benefit plan for its employees at the Wrexham, the United Kingdom facility, which was acquired as part of the Lincat acquisition.facility. Benefits are determined based upon retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit plan was frozen on April 30, 2010 prior to Middleby’s acquisition of the company. Noand no further benefits accrue to the participants beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2010 upon reaching retirement age.
The company maintains several pension plans related to AGA and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "AGA Group"), the most significant being the Aga Rangemaster Group Pension Scheme, which covers the majority of employees in the United Kingdom. Membership in the plan on a defined benefit basis of pension provision was closed to new entrants in 2001. The plan became open to new entrants on a defined contribution basis of pension provision in 2002, but was generally closed to new entrants on this basis during 2014.
The other, much smaller, defined benefit pension plans operating within the AGA Group cover employees in France Ireland and the United Kingdom. All pension plan assets are held in separate trust funds although the net defined benefit pension obligations are included in the company's consolidated balance sheet.
A summary of the plans’ net periodic pension cost, benefit obligations, funded status, and net balance sheet position is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2019 | | Fiscal 2018 |
| | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans |
| Net Periodic Pension Cost (Benefit): | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Service cost | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,457 |
| | $ | 365 |
| | $ | 3,754 |
|
| Interest cost | 1,253 |
| | 33,490 |
| | 1,082 |
| | 32,173 |
|
| Expected return on assets | (868 | ) | | (67,542 | ) | | (967 | ) | | (75,017 | ) |
| Amortization of net loss (gain) | 664 |
| | 721 |
| | (129 | ) | | 4,056 |
|
| Amortization of prior service cost | — |
| | 2,560 |
| | — |
| | 437 |
|
| Curtailment loss | — |
| | 865 |
| | — |
| | 906 |
|
| Pension settlement gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (655 | ) |
| | $ | 1,049 |
| | $ | (27,449 | ) | | $ | 351 |
| | $ | (34,346 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Change in Benefit Obligation: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Benefit obligation – beginning of year | $ | 31,559 |
| | $ | 1,377,575 |
| | $ | 31,908 |
| | $ | 1,615,244 |
|
| Service cost | — |
| | 2,457 |
| | 365 |
| | 3,754 |
|
| Prior service cost | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53,586 |
|
| Interest on benefit obligations | 1,253 |
| | 33,490 |
| | 1,082 |
| | 32,173 |
|
| Member contributions | — |
| | 313 |
| | — |
| | 290 |
|
| Actuarial loss (gain) | 4,173 |
| | 102,377 |
| | (850 | ) | | (163,746 | ) |
| Pension settlement gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (873 | ) |
| Net benefit payments | (1,590 | ) | | (62,355 | ) | | (946 | ) | | (72,095 | ) |
| Curtailment loss | — |
| | 865 |
| | — |
| | 906 |
|
| Exchange effect | — |
| | 46,894 |
| | — |
| | (91,664 | ) |
| Benefit obligation – end of year | $ | 35,395 |
| | $ | 1,501,616 |
| | $ | 31,559 |
| | $ | 1,377,575 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Change in Plan Assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Plan assets at fair value – beginning of year | $ | 14,634 |
| | $ | 1,141,381 |
| | $ | 16,102 |
| | $ | 1,296,539 |
|
| Company contributions | 1,191 |
| | 5,934 |
| | 877 |
| | 4,889 |
|
| Investment gain (loss) | 2,509 |
| | 107,368 |
| | (1,399 | ) | | (12,600 | ) |
| Member contributions | — |
| | 313 |
| | — |
| | 290 |
|
| Pension settlement loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (161 | ) |
| Benefit payments and plan expenses | (1,590 | ) | | (62,355 | ) | | (946 | ) | | (72,095 | ) |
| Exchange effect | — |
| | 38,540 |
| | — |
| | (75,481 | ) |
| Plan assets at fair value – end of year | $ | 16,744 |
| | $ | 1,231,181 |
| | $ | 14,634 |
| | $ | 1,141,381 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Funded Status: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Unfunded benefit obligation | $ | (18,651 | ) | | $ | (270,435 | ) | | $ | (16,925 | ) | | $ | (236,194 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Amounts recognized in balance sheet at year end: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Accrued pension benefits | $ | (18,651 | ) | | $ | (270,435 | ) | | $ | (16,925 | ) | | $ | (236,194 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2016 | | Fiscal 2015 |
| | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans |
| Net Periodic Pension Cost (Benefit): | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Service cost | $ | 456 |
| | $ | 3,364 |
| | $ | 505 |
| | $ | 1,216 |
|
| Interest cost | 1,280 |
| | 41,606 |
| | 1,254 |
| | 12,992 |
|
| Expected return on assets | (777 | ) | | (68,845 | ) | | (813 | ) | | (20,547 | ) |
| Amortization of net loss (gain) | 126 |
| | 35 |
| | 694 |
| | — |
|
| Curtailment (gain) loss | — |
| | (632 | ) | | — |
| | 3,202 |
|
| Pension settlement | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | $ | 1,085 |
| | $ | (24,472 | ) | | $ | 1,640 |
| | $ | (3,137 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Change in Benefit Obligation: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Benefit obligation – beginning of year | $ | 31,830 |
| | $ | 1,476,370 |
| | $ | 33,907 |
| | $ | 16,114 |
|
| Benefit obligation – acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,495,089 |
|
| Service cost | 456 |
| | 3,364 |
| | 505 |
| | 1,216 |
|
| Interest on benefit obligations | 1,280 |
| | 41,606 |
| | 1,254 |
| | 12,992 |
|
| Employee contributions | — |
| | 404 |
| | — |
| | 182 |
|
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (722 | ) | | 297,754 |
| | (2,969 | ) | | 8,668 |
|
| Pension settlement | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net benefit payments | (895 | ) | | (64,466 | ) | | (867 | ) | | (24,179 | ) |
| Curtailment (gain) loss | — |
| | (706 | ) | | — |
| | 3,202 |
|
| Exchange effect | — |
| | (275,833 | ) | | — |
| | (36,914 | ) |
| Benefit obligation – end of year | $ | 31,949 |
| | $ | 1,478,493 |
| | $ | 31,830 |
| | $ | 1,476,370 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Change in Plan Assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Plan assets at fair value – beginning of year | $ | 12,987 |
| | $ | 1,287,723 |
| | $ | 13,575 |
| | $ | 15,306 |
|
| Plan assets at fair value – acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,305,506 |
|
| Company contributions | 754 |
| | 17,758 |
| | 823 |
| | 16,950 |
|
| Investment gain (loss) | 743 |
| | 161,405 |
| | (544 | ) | | 6,173 |
|
| Employee contributions | — |
| | 404 |
| | — |
| | 182 |
|
| Benefit payments and plan expenses | (895 | ) | | (64,466 | ) | | (867 | ) | | (24,179 | ) |
| Exchange effect | — |
| | (228,959 | ) | | — |
| | (32,215 | ) |
| Plan assets at fair value – end of year | $ | 13,589 |
| | $ | 1,173,865 |
| | $ | 12,987 |
| | $ | 1,287,723 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Funded Status: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Unfunded benefit obligation | $ | (18,360 | ) | | $ | (304,628 | ) | | $ | (18,843 | ) | | $ | (188,647 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Amounts recognized in balance sheet at year end: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Accrued pension benefits | $ | (18,360 | ) | | $ | (304,628 | ) | | $ | (18,843 | ) | | $ | (188,647 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Pre-tax components in accumulated other comprehensive income at period end: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net actuarial loss | $ | 4,908 |
| | $ | 206,490 |
| | $ | 5,725 |
| | $ | 25,141 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Pre-tax components in recognized in other comprehensive income for the period: | | | | | | | |
| Current year actuarial (gain) loss | $ | (691 | ) | | $ | 181,384 |
| | $ | (1,612 | ) | | $ | 25,141 |
|
| Actuarial loss recognized | (126 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (694 | ) | | — |
|
| Total amount recognized | $ | (817 | ) | | $ | 181,349 |
| | $ | (2,306 | ) | | $ | 25,141 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated Benefit Obligation | $ | 31,041 |
| | $ | 1,478,435 |
| | $ | 30,106 |
| | $ | 1,475,631 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Salary growth rate | n/a |
| | 1.6 | % | | n/a |
| | 1.5 | % |
| Assumed discount rate | 3.9 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 4.1 | % | | 3.7 | % |
| Expected return on assets | 6.0 | % | | 6.2 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 6.2 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2019 | | Fiscal 2018 |
| | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans |
| Pre-tax components in accumulated other comprehensive income at period end: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net actuarial loss | $ | 6,853 |
| | $ | 270,116 |
| | $ | 4,985 |
| | $ | 202,672 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Pre-tax components recognized in other comprehensive income for the period: | | | | | | | |
| Current year actuarial (gain) loss | $ | 2,532 |
| | $ | 69,228 |
| | $ | 1,516 |
| | $ | (88,992 | ) |
| Actuarial gain (loss) recognized | (664 | ) | | (798 | ) | | 129 |
| | (4,741 | ) |
| Prior service cost | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53,586 |
|
| Prior service cost recognized | — |
| | (986 | ) | | — |
| | (437 | ) |
| Pension settlement gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (713 | ) |
| Pension settlement gain recognized | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 654 |
|
| Total amount recognized | $ | 1,868 |
| | $ | 67,444 |
| | $ | 1,645 |
| | $ | (40,643 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated Benefit Obligation | $ | 35,395 |
| | $ | 1,501,616 |
| | $ | 31,559 |
| | $ | 1,377,532 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Salary growth rate | n/a |
| | 0.8 | % | | n/a |
| | 0.8 | % |
| Assumed discount rate | 3.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 4.1 | % | | 2.7 | % |
| Expected return on assets | 6.0 | % | | 6.2 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 6.2 | % |
On October 26, 2018, in Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees Limited vs. Lloyds Bank plc and Others, the High Court of Justice in the United Kingdom issued a ruling ("Court Ruling") requiring Lloyds Bank plc to equalize benefits payable to men and women under its U.K. defined benefit pension plan. The Court Ruling noted that the formulas used to determine guaranteed minimum pension (GMP) benefits violated gender-pay equality laws due to differences in the way benefits were calculated for men and women. As a result of this ruling, the U.K. pension plan was required to amend its benefit formulas and account for the higher pension payments resulting from GMP equalization. In accordance with ASC 715, this Court Ruling represents a change to the company's U.K. pension plans resulting in a retroactive increase in benefit levels for plan participants and has been accounted for as a prior service cost deferred in other comprehensive income, to be amortized as a component of net periodic pension benefit in future periods. The U.K. pension plans projected benefit obligation increased $53.6 million as a result of the Court Ruling, subject to potential future adjustments as the calculations by participants are finalized.
The company has engaged non-affiliated third party professional investment advisors to assist the company to develop its investment policy and establish asset allocations. The company's overall investment objective is to provide a return, that along with company contributions, is expected to meet future benefit payments. Investment policy is established in consideration of anticipated future timing of benefit payments under the plans. The anticipated duration of the investment and the potential for investment losses during that period are carefully weighed against the potential for appreciation when making investment decisions. The company routinely monitors the performance of investments made under the plans and reviews investment policy in consideration of changes made to the plans or expected changes in the timing of future benefit payments.
The assets of the plans were invested in the following classes of securities (none of which were securities of the company):
U.S. Plans:
| | | | Target Allocation |
| | Percentage of Plan Assets | | Target Allocation | | Percentage of Plan Assets |
| | | | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Equity | 48 | % | | 51 | % | | 47 | % | 48 | % | | 51 | % | | 42 | % |
| Fixed income | 40 |
| | 39 |
| | 39 |
| 40 |
| | 37 |
| | 49 |
|
| Money market | 4 |
| | 3 |
| | 5 |
| 4 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
|
| Other (real estate investment trusts & commodities contracts) | 8 |
| | 7 |
| | 9 |
| 8 |
| | 10 |
| | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | |
Non-U.S. Plans:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Target Allocation | | Percentage of Plan Assets |
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Equity | 17 | % | | 22 | % | | 23 | % |
| Fixed income | 38 |
| | 39 |
| | 52 |
|
| Alternatives/Other | 32 |
| | 22 |
| | 9 |
|
| Real Estate | 13 |
| | 13 |
| | 14 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | — |
| | 4 |
| | 2 |
|
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Target Allocation |
| | Percentage of Plan Assets | |
| | | | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
|
| Equity | 16 | % | | 20 | % | | 19 | % |
| Fixed income | 45 |
| | 55 |
| | 44 |
|
| Alternatives/Other | 28 |
| | 8 |
| | 20 |
|
| Real Estate | 11 |
| | 12 |
| | 12 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | — |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
In accordance with ASC 820 “FairFair Value Measurements and Disclosures”Disclosures, the company has measured its defined benefit pension plans at fair value. In accordance with ASU 2015-04, "Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer's Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets", the company has elected to measure the pension plan assets and obligations as of the calendar month-end closest to the fiscal year end. The following tables summarize the basis used to measure the pension plans’ assets at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and January 2, 201628, 2019and December 29, 2018 (in thousands):
U.S. Plans:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal 2019 | | Fiscal 2018 |
| Asset Category | | Total |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
| | Net Asset Value |
| | Total |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
| | Net Asset Value |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short Term Investment Fund (a) | | $ | 347 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 175 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 175 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Securities: | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Large Cap | | 3,957 |
| | 3,957 |
| | — |
| | 2,615 |
| | 2,615 |
| | — |
|
| Mid Cap | | 417 |
| | 417 |
| | — |
| | 329 |
| | 329 |
| | — |
|
| Small Cap | | 418 |
| | 418 |
| | — |
| | 326 |
| | 326 |
| | — |
|
| International | | 3,657 |
| | 3,657 |
| | — |
| | 2,937 |
| | 2,937 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Income: | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Government/Corporate | | 4,992 |
| | 4,992 |
| | — |
| | 5,994 |
| | 5,994 |
| | — |
|
| High Yield | | 1,260 |
| | 1,260 |
| | — |
| | 1,102 |
| | 1,102 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alternative: | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Global Real Estate Investment Trust | | 1,358 |
| | 1,358 |
| | — |
| | 591 |
| | 591 |
| | — |
|
| Commodities Contracts | | 338 |
| | 338 |
| | — |
| | 565 |
| | 565 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 16,744 |
| | $ | 16,397 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 14,634 |
| | $ | 14,459 |
| | $ | 175 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal 2016 | | Fiscal 2015 |
| Asset Category | | Total |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
| | Net Asset Value |
| | Total |
| | Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) |
| | Net Asset Value |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short Term Investment Fund (a) | | $ | 368 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 368 |
| | $ | 540 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 540 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Securities: | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Large Cap | | 3,055 |
| | 3,055 |
| | — |
| | 3,149 |
| | 3,149 |
| | — |
|
| Mid Cap | | 512 |
| | 512 |
| | — |
| | 383 |
| | 383 |
| | — |
|
| Small Cap | | 455 |
| | 455 |
| | — |
| | 383 |
| | 383 |
| | — |
|
| International | | 2,917 |
| | 2,917 |
| | — |
| | 2,291 |
| | 2,291 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Income: | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Government/Corporate | | 4,367 |
| | 4,367 |
| | — |
| | 4,311 |
| | 4,311 |
| | — |
|
| High Yield | | 971 |
| | 971 |
| | — |
| | 778 |
| | 778 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alternative: | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Global Real Estate Investment Trust | | 539 |
| | 539 |
| | — |
| | 771 |
| | 771 |
| | — |
|
| Commodities Contracts | | 405 |
| | 405 |
| | — |
| | 381 |
| | 381 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 13,589 |
| | $ | 13,221 |
| | $ | 368 |
| | $ | 12,987 |
| | $ | 12,447 |
| | $ | 540 |
|
| |
| (a) | Represents collective short term investment fund, composed of high-grade money market instruments with short maturities. |
Non-U.S. Plans:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal 2019 |
| Asset Category | | Total |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
| | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
| | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | Net Asset Value |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 44,748 |
| | $ | 18,142 |
| | $ | 2,874 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23,732 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Securities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| UK | | 101,922 |
| | 88,830 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,092 |
|
| International: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Developed | | 165,709 |
| | 13,170 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 152,539 |
|
| Emerging | | 11,653 |
| | 650 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,003 |
|
| Unquoted/Private Equity | | 123 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 123 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government/Corporate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| UK | | 189,513 |
| | 14,245 |
| | 2,867 |
| | — |
| | 172,401 |
|
| International | | 86,208 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 86,208 |
|
| Index Linked | | 189,463 |
| | 2,085 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 187,378 |
|
| Other | | 6,367 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,367 |
|
| Convertible Bonds | | 177 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 177 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct | | 154,494 |
| | — |
| | 154,494 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Indirect | | 8,155 |
| | 137 |
| | 7,603 |
| | — |
| | 415 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hedge Fund Strategy: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Long/Short | | 21,683 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,683 |
|
| Arbitrage & Event | | 29,284 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29,284 |
|
| Directional Trading & Fixed Income | | 9,361 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,361 |
|
| Cash & Other | | 163,058 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 163,058 |
|
| Direct Sourcing | | 2,269 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,269 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leveraged Loans | | 21,635 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,635 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alternative/Other | | 25,359 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25,358 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 1,231,181 |
| | $ | 137,260 |
| | $ | 167,838 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 926,083 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal 2016 |
| Asset Category | | Total |
| | Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) |
| | Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) |
| | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) |
| | Net Asset Value |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 58,131 |
| | $ | 4,730 |
| | $ | 2,886 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 50,515 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Securities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| UK | | 87,828 |
| | 2,098 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 85,730 |
|
| International: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Developed | | 135,186 |
| | 3,547 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 131,639 |
|
| Emerging | | 6,803 |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,724 |
|
| Unquoted/Private Equity | | 3189 |
| | 0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,189 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government/Corporate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| UK | | 317,621 |
| | 11,203 |
| | 14,009 |
| | — |
| | 292,409 |
|
| International | | 107,882 |
| | — |
| | 103 |
| | — |
| | 107,779 |
|
| Index Linked | | 212,327 |
| | 4,205 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 208,122 |
|
| Other | | 3,812 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,812 |
|
| Convertible Bonds | | 160 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 160 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct | | 121,612 |
| | — |
| | 121,612 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Indirect | | 10,693 |
| | 138 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,555 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hedge Fund Strategy: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Long/Short | | 61,612 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 61,612 |
|
| Arbitrage & Event | | 64,961 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 64,961 |
|
| Directional Trading & Fixed Income | | 30,430 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30,430 |
|
| Cash & Other | | 38,099 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 38,099 |
|
| Direct Sourcing | | 1,379 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,379 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leveraged Loans | | 11,025 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,025 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alternative/Other | | (98,885 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 95 |
| | (98,980 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 1,173,865 |
| | $ | 26,000 |
| | $ | 138,610 |
| | $ | 95 |
| | $ | 1,009,160 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal 2018 |
| Asset Category | | Total |
| | Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) |
| | Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) |
| | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) |
| | Net Asset Value |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 28,434 |
| | $ | 4,325 |
| | $ | 2,656 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21,453 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Securities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| UK | | 155,687 |
| | 78,938 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 76,749 |
|
| International: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Developed | | 99,872 |
| | 14,497 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 85,375 |
|
| Emerging | | 7,488 |
| | 591 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,897 |
|
| Unquoted/Private Equity | | 1,752 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,752 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government/Corporate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| UK | | 468,608 |
| | 11,860 |
| | 6,779 |
| | — |
| | 449,969 |
|
| International | | 75,980 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 75,980 |
|
| Index Linked | | 47,873 |
| | 3,614 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 44,259 |
|
| Other | | 650 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 650 |
|
| Convertible Bonds | | 188 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 188 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct | | 148,551 |
| | — |
| | 148,551 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Indirect | | 10,812 |
| | 188 |
| | 9,298 |
| | — |
| | 1,326 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hedge Fund Strategy: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Long/Short | | 73,783 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 73,783 |
|
| Arbitrage & Event | | 73,261 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 73,261 |
|
| Directional Trading & Fixed Income | | 44,091 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 44,091 |
|
| Cash & Other | | 21,719 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,719 |
|
| Direct Sourcing | | 2,289 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,289 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leveraged Loans | | 18,295 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,295 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alternative/Other | | (137,952 | ) | | 5 |
| | — |
| | 86 |
| | (138,043 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 1,141,381 |
| | $ | 114,018 |
| | $ | 167,284 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 859,993 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal 2015 |
| Asset Category | | Total |
| | Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) |
| | Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) |
| | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) |
| | Net Asset Value |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 73,006 |
| | $ | 3,937 |
| | $ | 3,288 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 65,781 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Securities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| UK | | 91,269 |
| | 2,565 |
| | 194 |
| | — |
| | 88,510 |
|
| International: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Developed | | 147,277 |
| | 3,294 |
| | 2,414 |
| | — |
| | 141,569 |
|
| Emerging | | 6,375 |
| | 77 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,298 |
|
| Unquoted/Private Equity | | 759 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 759 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government/Corporate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| UK | | 168,706 |
| | 10,816 |
| | 19,952 |
| | — |
| | 137,938 |
|
| International | | 126,735 |
| | — |
| | 1,046 |
| | — |
| | 125,689 |
|
| Index Linked | | 258,502 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 258,502 |
|
| Other | | 3,518 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,518 |
|
| Convertible Bonds | | 1,471 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,471 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct | | 140,765 |
| | — |
| | 140,765 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Indirect | | 13,617 |
| | 177 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,440 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hedge Fund Strategy: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Long/Short | | 80,230 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,230 |
|
| Arbitrage & Event | | 92,635 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 92,635 |
|
| Directional Trading & Fixed Income | | 55,424 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 55,424 |
|
| Cash & Other | | 2,557 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,557 |
|
| Direct Sourcing | | 1,655 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,655 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leveraged Loans | | 10,824 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,824 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alternative/Other | | 12,398 |
| | 288 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,110 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 1,287,723 |
| | $ | 21,154 |
| | $ | 167,659 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,098,910 |
|
The fair value of the Level 1 assets is based on observable, quoted market prices of the identical underlying security in an active market. The fair value of the Level 2 assets is primarily based on market observable inputs to quoted market prices, benchmark yields and broker/dealer quotes. Level 3 inputs, as applicable, represent unobservable inputs that reflect assumptions developed by management to measure assets at fair value.
The expected return on assets is developed in consideration of the anticipated duration of investment period for assets held by the plan, the allocation of assets in the plan, and the historical returns for plan assets.
Estimated future benefit payments under the plans are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans |
| 2020 | $ | 1,738 |
| | $ | 63,856 |
|
| 2021 | 1,763 |
| | 65,110 |
|
| 2022 | 1,776 |
| | 66,177 |
|
| 2023 | 1,784 |
| | 66,332 |
|
| 2024 through 2029 | 11,267 |
| | 405,088 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans |
| 2017 | $ | 977 |
| | $ | 54,702 |
|
| 2018 | 1,648 |
| | 56,430 |
|
| 2019 | 1,653 |
| | 57,493 |
|
| 2020 | 1,674 |
| | 59,525 |
|
| 2021 through 2026 | 10,634 |
| | 368,206 |
|
Expected contributions to the U.S. Plans and Non-U.S. Plans to be made in 20172020 are $1.2$1.3 million and $3.5$5.8 million, respectively.
| |
| (b) | Defined Contribution Plans |
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the company maintained two2 separate defined contribution 401K401(k) savings plans covering all employees in the United States. These two2 plans separately cover the union employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility and all other remaining union and non-union employees in the United States. The company also maintained defined contribution plans for its UK based employees.
(11)(12) QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
| | | | | 1st | | 2nd | | 3rd | | 4th | | Total Year | | 1st | | 2nd | | 3rd | | 4th | | Total Year |
| | | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | | | | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | | |
| 2016 | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| 2019 | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Net sales | | $ | 516,355 |
| | $ | 580,456 |
| | $ | 574,224 |
| | $ | 596,817 |
| | $ | 2,267,852 |
| | $ | 686,802 |
| | $ | 761,004 |
| | $ | 724,014 |
| | $ | 787,626 |
| | $ | 2,959,446 |
|
| Gross profit | | 196,773 |
| | 233,502 |
| | 231,728 |
| | 239,177 |
| | 901,180 |
| | 257,312 |
| | 286,479 |
| | 270,028 |
| | 289,678 |
| | 1,103,497 |
|
| Income from operations | | 86,375 |
| | 111,913 |
| | 121,439 |
| | 126,498 |
| | 446,225 |
| | 101,061 |
| | 139,607 |
| | 121,345 |
| | 152,030 |
| | 514,043 |
|
| Net earnings | | $ | 54,538 |
| | $ | 72,891 |
| | $ | 75,851 |
| | $ | 80,936 |
| | $ | 284,216 |
| | $ | 69,013 |
| | $ | 92,210 |
| | $ | 82,020 |
| | $ | 108,997 |
| | $ | 352,240 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share (1) | | $ | 0.96 |
| | $ | 1.28 |
| | $ | 1.33 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 1.24 |
| | $ | 1.66 |
| | $ | 1.47 |
| | $ | 1.96 |
| | $ | 6.33 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share (1) | | $ | 0.96 |
| | $ | 1.28 |
| | $ | 1.33 |
| | $ | 1.41 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 1.24 |
| | $ | 1.66 |
| | $ | 1.47 |
| | $ | 1.96 |
| | $ | 6.33 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| 2018 | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Net sales | | $ | 406,596 |
| | $ | 436,291 |
| | $ | 449,004 |
| | $ | 534,707 |
| | $ | 1,826,598 |
| | $ | 584,800 |
| | $ | 668,128 |
| | $ | 713,331 |
| | $ | 756,672 |
| | $ | 2,722,931 |
|
| Gross profit | | 157,562 |
| | 172,889 |
| | 177,182 |
| | 198,872 |
| | 706,505 |
| | 211,633 |
| | 250,759 |
| | 261,160 |
| | 280,588 |
| | 1,004,140 |
|
| Income from operations | | 66,580 |
| | 83,360 |
| | 80,030 |
| | 72,633 |
| | 302,603 |
| | 86,992 |
| | 111,310 |
| | 107,677 |
| | 139,987 |
| | 445,966 |
|
| Net earnings | | $ | 38,231 |
| | $ | 54,267 |
| | $ | 48,825 |
| | $ | 50,287 |
| | $ | 191,610 |
| | $ | 65,420 |
| | $ | 83,988 |
| | $ | 72,905 |
| | $ | 94,839 |
| | $ | 317,152 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share (1) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.95 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
| | $ | 0.88 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.51 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 5.71 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share (1) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.95 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
| | $ | 0.88 |
| | $ | 3.36 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.51 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 1.70 |
| | $ | 5.70 |
|
| |
| (1) | Sum of quarters may not equal the total for the year due to changes in the number of shares outstanding during the year. |
(12)(13) RESTRUCTURING AND ACQUISITION INTEGRATION INITIATIVES
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group:
During the fiscal years 2019 and 2018, the company undertook cost reduction initiatives related to the entire Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group. These actions resulted in a charge of $6.4 million and $3.5 million in the twelve months ended December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively, primarily for severance related to headcount reductions and facility consolidations. These expenses are reflected in restructuring expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The company estimates that these restructuring initiatives will result in future cost savings of approximately $10.0 million to $15.0 million annually, beginning in fiscal 2020. At December 28, 2019, the restructuring obligations accrued for these initiatives are immaterial and will be substantially complete by first quarter of fiscal year 2016,2020.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group:
Since the 2015 acquisition of the AGA Group, the company undertook various acquisition integration initiatives including
organizational restructuring, headcount reductions and consolidation and disposition of certain facilities and business
operations, including the impairment of equipment and facilities. Most recently during 2018, the company undertook
additional restructuring efforts related to Grange, a non-core business within the AGA Group, and elected to cease its
operations. This process was largely completed in the fourth quarter of 2018. During fiscal 2019, the initiatives within the AGA Group were primarily related to headcount reductions. The company recorded expense of $2.3 million, $15.1 million and $11.9 million, respectively in the years ended December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively.
Additionally within the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group, the company incurred restructuring charges relativecosts, primarily for severance related to eachheadcount reductions and facility consolidations. The company recorded expense of its business segments. $1.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively in the years ended December 28, 2019 and December 30, 2017, respectively.
These expenses are reflected in restructuring expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The cumulative expenses incurred to date for these initiatives is approximately $59.7 million. The primary realization of the cost savings began in 2017 and 2018 related to compensation and facility costs of approximately $20.0 million annually. The company estimates the 2019 restructuring initiatives will result in future cost savings of approximately $3.0 million annually. The restructuring obligations accrued for these initiatives are immaterial and will be paid by the end of fiscal of 2020.
The costs and corresponding reserve balances (by segment)for the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Severance/Benefits | | Facilities/Operations | | Other | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | $ | 5,145 |
| | $ | 2,032 |
| | $ | 69 |
| | $ | 7,246 |
|
| Expenses | | 8,662 |
| | 3,872 |
| | 601 |
| | 13,135 |
|
| Exchange Effect | | 533 |
| | 358 |
| | 11 |
| | 902 |
|
| Payments | | (10,642 | ) | | (4,795 | ) | | (524 | ) | | (15,961 | ) |
| Balance as of December 30, 2017 | | $ | 3,698 |
| | $ | 1,467 |
| | $ | 157 |
| | $ | 5,322 |
|
| Expenses | | 6,367 |
| | 3,771 |
| | 5,001 |
| | 15,139 |
|
| Exchange Effect | | (49 | ) | | (11 | ) | | 23 |
| | (37 | ) |
| Payments/Utilization | | (9,150 | ) | | (5,171 | ) | | (4,394 | ) | | (18,715 | ) |
| Balance as of December 29, 2018 | | $ | 866 |
| | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 787 |
| | $ | 1,709 |
|
| Expenses | | 3,766 |
| | 684 |
| | (476 | ) | | 3,974 |
|
| Exchange Effect | | 24 |
| | (7 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (38 | ) |
| Payments/Utilization | | (3,990 | ) | | (632 | ) | | (256 | ) | | (4,878 | ) |
| Balance as of December 28, 2019 | | $ | 666 |
| | $ | 101 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 767 |
|
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group:
During the third quarter of 2015,
(14) SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 31, 2020, the company closed one manufacturingentered into an amended and restated five-year, $3.5 billion multi-currency senior secured credit agreement. This facility withinreplaces the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Groupcompany's pre-existing $3.0 billion Credit Facility, which had an original maturity of July 2021. The Amended Facility consists of (i) a $750.0 million term loan facility and transferred production(ii) a $2.75 billion multi-currency revolving credit facility, with the potential under certain circumstances, to another existing manufacturing facility within the company. This action, which was not material to the company’s operations, resulting in a charge of $0.9 million for severance and lease costs in restructuring expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended, January 2, 2016. The company estimated that these restructuring initiatives would result in future cost savings of approximately $1.0 million annually, beginning in fiscal year 2016 and no significant future costs related to this action are expected.
Food Processing Equipment Group:
During the third quarter of 2015, the company closed one manufacturing facility within the Food Processing Equipment Group and transferred production to another existing manufacturing facility within the company. This action, which was not material to the company’s operations, resulting in a charge of $2.4 million for severance and lease costs in restructuring expenses and $0.2 million in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended, January 2, 2016. The company estimated that these restructuring initiatives would result in future cost savings of approximately $3.5 million annually, beginning in fiscal year 2017 and no significant future costs related to this action are expected.
Residential Kitchen Equipment Group:
During the fiscal years 2015 and 2014, the company took actions to improve the operations of Viking within the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. Additionally, during the fiscal years 2016 and 2015, the company undertook acquisition integration initiatives related to AGA within the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group. These initiatives included organizational restructuring and headcount reductions, consolidation and disposition of certain facilities and business operations. The company recorded expense inincrease the amount of $11.0 million, $25.5 millionthe credit facility to up to a total of $4.0 billion (plus additional amounts, subject to compliance with a senior secured net leverage ratio). The Amended Facility matures on January 31, 2025. At inception, the Amended Facility bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.625%, which is adjusted quarterly based upon the company's leverage ratio. The term loan facility will amortize in equal quarterly installments due on the last day of each fiscal quarter, commencing with the first full fiscal quarter after January 31, 2020, in an aggregate annual amount equal to 2.50% of the original aggregate principal amount of the term loan facility, with the balance, plus any accrued interest, due and $7.2 million, respectively inpayable on January 31, 2025. The Amended Facility provides for availability to provide working capital, capital expenditures, to support the years ended December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016issuance of letters of credit and January 3, 2015, respectively. This expense is reflected in restructuring expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings for such periods. The company estimated that these restructuring initiatives would result in future cost savings of approximately $24.1 million annually, beginning in fiscal year 2016, primarily related to compensation and facility costs. The company anticipates that all severance obligations for the Residential Kitchen Equipment Group will be satisfied by the end of fiscal of 2017. The lease obligations extend through November 2018.other general corporate purposes.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Severance/Benefits | | Facilities/Operations | | Other | | Total |
| Balance as of December 28, 2013 | | $ | 1,619 |
| | $ | 77 |
| | $ | 108 |
| | $ | 1,804 |
|
| Expenses | | 3,776 |
| �� | 3,457 |
| | (4 | ) | | 7,229 |
|
| Payments | | (5,248 | ) | | (3,534 | ) | | (67 | ) | | (8,849 | ) |
| Balance as of January 3, 2015 | | $ | 147 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 184 |
|
| Expenses | | 18,142 |
| | 7,248 |
| | 108 |
| | 25,498 |
|
| Payments | | (2,628 | ) | | (2,606 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (5,259 | ) |
| Balance as of January 2, 2016 | | $ | 15,661 |
| | $ | 4,642 |
| | $ | 120 |
| | $ | 20,423 |
|
| Expenses | | 9,816 |
| | 1,160 |
| | 10 |
| | 10,986 |
|
| Exchange Effect | | (749 | ) | | (73 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (854 | ) |
| Payments | | (19,583 | ) | | (3,697 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (23,309 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | $ | 5,145 |
| | $ | 2,032 |
| | $ | 69 |
| | $ | 7,246 |
|
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, JANUARY 2, 201628, 2019, DECEMBER 29, 2018
AND JANUARY 3, 2015DECEMBER 30, 2017
(amounts in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance Beginning Of Period |
| | Additions/ (Recoveries) Charged to Expense |
| | Other Adjustments (1) |
| | Write-Offs During the the Period |
| | Balance At End Of Period |
|
| Allowance for doubtful accounts; deducted from accounts receivable on the balance sheets- | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2016 | $ | 8,838,500 |
| | $ | 45,900 |
| | $ | 4,886,500 |
| | $ | (1,170,700 | ) | | $ | 12,600,200 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | $ | 9,091,000 |
| | $ | 121,800 |
| | $ | 1,103,400 |
| | $ | (1,477,700 | ) | | $ | 8,838,500 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | $ | 6,987,000 |
| | $ | 3,075,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (971,000 | ) | | $ | 9,091,000 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance Beginning Of Period |
| | Additions/ (Recoveries) Charged to Expense |
| | Other Adjustments (1) |
| | Write-Offs During the Period |
| | Balance At End Of Period |
|
| Allowance for doubtful accounts; deducted from accounts receivable on the balance sheets- | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | $ | 13,608 |
| | $ | 1,941 |
| | $ | 2,009 |
| | $ | (2,672 | ) | | $ | 14,886 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | $ | 13,182 |
| | $ | 3,160 |
| | $ | 1,121 |
| | $ | (3,855 | ) | | $ | 13,608 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2017 | $ | 12,600 |
| | $ | 2,084 |
| | $ | 478 |
| | $ | (1,979 | ) | | $ | 13,182 |
|
(1) Amounts consist primarily of valuation allowances assumed from acquired companies.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance
Beginning
Of Period |
| | Additions/
(Recoveries)
Charged
to Expense |
| | Write-Offs
During the
Period |
| | Balance
At End
Of Period |
|
| Valuation allowance - Deferred tax assets | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | $ | 26,023 |
| | $ | 129 |
| | $ | (18,398 | ) | | $ | 7,754 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | $ | 23,190 |
| | $ | 2,833 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 26,023 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2017 | $ | 29,893 |
| | $ | (6,703 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 23,190 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance
Beginning
Of Period |
| | Additions/
(Recoveries)
Charged
to Expense(1) |
| | Write-Offs
During the
the Period |
| | Balance
At End
Of Period |
|
| Valuation allowance - Deferred tax assets | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2016 | $ | 20,395,200 |
| | $ | 9,497,800 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 29,893,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,395,200 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,395,200 |
|
(1) Reserve related to the acquisition of AGA.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the company's management, including the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019. Based on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this period.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there have been no changes in the company's internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| |
| (i) | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
| |
| (ii) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| |
| (iii) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (COSO). Our assessment of the internal control structure excluded FollettEVO (acquired MayDecember 31, 2016)2018), Cooking Solutions Group (acquired April 1, 2019), Powerhouse (acquired April 1, 2019), Ss Brewtech (acquired June 15, 2019), Pacproinc (acquired July 16, 2019), Brava (acquired November 19, 2019), and Synesso (acquired November 27, 2019).
This acquisition constitutes 16.4%These acquisitions constitute (0.3)% and 7.7%6.4% of net and total assets, respectively, 4.5%3.6% of net sales and 3.7%(1.7)% of net income of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. This acquisition is28, 2019. These acquisitions are included in the consolidated financial statements of the company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.28, 2019. Under guidelines established by the Securities Exchange Commission, companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company.companies.
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, who audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of the company included in this report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
The Middleby Corporation
March 1, 2017February 26, 2020
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Pursuant to General Instruction G (3), of Form 10-K, the information called for by Part III (ItemItem 10 (Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance), Item 11 (Executive Compensation), Item 12 (Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters), Item 13 (Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence) and Item 14 (Principal Accountant Fees and Services), is incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
| |
| (a) | 1. Financial Statements |
The financial statements listed on Page 48 are filed as part of this Form 10-K.
| |
| 4.1 | Certificate of Designations dated October 30, 1987, and specimen stock certificate relating to the company Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference from the company’s Form 10-K, Exhibit (4), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988, filed on March 15, 1989. |
| |
| 10.1 | SixthSeventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2016,January 31, 2020, among Middleby Marshall Inc,Inc., The Middleby Corporation, the Initial Subsidiary Borrowers named therein, the lenders named therein and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders, incorporated by reference to Middleby's Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on AugustFebruary 3, 2016.2020. |
| |
10.2*10.2 | First Amendment and Tranche Increase Amendment to Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2018, among Middleby Marshall Inc., the lenders named therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders, incorporated by reference to Middleby's Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on December 20, 2018. |
| |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline Extensive Business Reporting Language (iXBRL) and contained in Exhibit 101). |
| |
| * | Designates management contract or compensation plan. |
| |
| (c) | See the financial statement schedule included under Item 8. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 1st26th day of March 2017.February 2020.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
|
| | |
| | BY: | /s/ Timothy J. FitzGeraldBryan E. Mittelman |
| | | Timothy J. FitzGerald |
| | Vice President,Bryan E. Mittelman |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 1, 2017.February 26, 2020.
|
| | |
| Signatures | | Title |
| | | |
| PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER | | |
| | | |
/s/ Selim A. Bassoul | | Chairman of the Board, President, |
Selim A. BassoulTimothy J. FitzGerald | | Chief Executive Officer and Director |
| Timothy J. FitzGerald | | |
| | | |
| PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND | | |
| ACCOUNTING OFFICER | | |
| | | |
/s/ Timothy J. FitzGeraldBryan E. Mittelman | | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
Timothy J. FitzGeraldBryan E. Mittelman | | Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal |
| | | Principal Accounting Officer |
| DIRECTORS | | |
| | | |
/s/ Robert LambGordon O'Brien | | Chairman of the Board, Director |
| Gordon O'Brien | | |
| | |
| /s/ Sarah Palisi Chapin | | Director |
Robert LambSarah Palisi Chapin | | |
| | |
| /s/ Cathy L. McCarthy | | Director |
| Cathy L. McCarthy | | |
| | | |
| /s/ John R. Miller, III | | Director |
| John R. Miller, III | | |
| | | |
/s/ Gordon O'BrienRobert Nerbonne | | Director |
Gordon O'BrienRobert Nerbonne | | |
| | | |
/s/ Philip G. PutnamNassem Ziyad | | Director |
Philip G. Putnam | | |
| | |
/s/ Cathy L. McCarthy | | Director |
Cathy L. McCarthy | | |
| | |
/s/ Sarah Palisi Chapin | | Director |
Sarah Palisi ChapinNassem Ziyad | | |