FORM 10-K
                         SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                  Washington, D.C.

      (Mark One)

      xX   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934     For the fiscal year ended December 31, 19961997


                                         OR

         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF     1934
           For the transition period from ____________________ to
           ____________________


      Commission file number 0-14714



       ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

               Tennessee                                   62-0873631

      (State or other jurisdiction of                     (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)                  Identification No.)


      P. O. Box 72787, 4101 Jerome Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee    37407

      (Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip Code)


      Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (423) 867-4210


      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

      Title of each class      Name of each exchange on which registered

             NONE                            NONE           


      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                    Common Stock, $.20 par value

                           (Title of class)

      Indicate by check mark whether the  registrant (1) has filed all  reports
      required to be filed  by Section 13 or  15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
      Act of 1934 during  the preceding 12 months  (or for such shorter  period
      that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has  been
      subject  to   such   filing   requirements  for   the   past   90   days.
      Yes    X                   No 



                         (Form 10-K Cover Page - Continued)

      Indicate by check  mark if disclosure  of delinquent  filers pursuant  to
      Item 405  of Regulation  S-K is  not contained  herein, and  will not  be
      contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy  or
      information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
      10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [     ]

      The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates  of
      the registrant  was  $72,401,400$148,371,903 based upon  the  closing  sales  price
      reported by the NASDAQ National Market on March 10, 1997,9, 1998, using beneficial
      ownership of stock rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude  voting stock owned by all directors  and
      executive officers of the registrant, some of whom may not be held to  be
      affiliates upon judicial determination.


                     (APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

      Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
      classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:


                                 As of March 10, 19979, 1998
                   Common Stock, par value $.20 -- 10,044,199- 9,360,580 shares


                         DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

           Portions of the following documents have been incorporated by
      reference into the Parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K indicated:

                Document                                Form 10-K


           Proxy Statement relating to                   Part III
           Annual Meeting of Shareholders
           to be held on April 24, 199723, 1998


                               ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            19961997 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                       Page

      PART I

      Item  1.  BusinessBusiness............................................    1
      Item  2.  PropertiesProperties..........................................    8
      Item  3.  Legal ProceedingsProceedings...................................    9
      Item  4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersHolders.    9
      Executive Officers of the RegistrantRegistrant..........................    9

      PART II

      Item  5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
                     Shareholder MattersMatters............................   10
      Item  6.  Selected Financial DataData.............................   11
      Item  7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
                     Condition and Results of OperationsOperations............   11
      Item  8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary DataData.........   11
      Item  9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
                     Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosure............   11


      PART III

      Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the RegistrantRegistrant..   11
      Item 11.  Executive CompensationCompensation..............................   11
      Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
                     and ManagementManagement.................................   12
      Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsTransactions......   12

      PART IV

      Item 14.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
                     Reports on Form 8-K8-K............................   12
      Appendix A	

SIGNATURESA....................................................  A-1

      SIGNATURES....................................................


                                        -iii-


                                       PART I
      Item 1.  BUSINESS
                                       General

           Astec Industries, Inc.  (the "Company") is  a Tennessee  corporation
      which  was  incorporated  in  1972.    The  Company  designs,  engineers,
      manufactures,  markets,  and  marketsfinances  equipment  and  components   used
      primarily in  road building  and related  construction activities.  The
      Company's products  are  used  in  each  phase  of  road  building, from
      quarrying and crushing the aggregate to application of the road  surface.
      The Company also manufactures certain equipment and components  unrelated
      to road  construction,  including  trenching  and  excavating  equipment,
      environmental  remediation  equipment,   log 
loading and  industrial  heat   transfer
      equipment.  The Company holds 65101  United States and 6357 foreign  patents,
      has 47 patent  applications pending, and  has been  responsible for  many
      technological and engineering innovations in  the industry.  The  Company
      currently manufactures over 140 different products, which it markets both
      domestically and internationally.   In  addition to  plant and  equipment
      sales, the Company manufactures and sells replacement parts for equipment
      in each of its product lines.   The distribution and sale of  replacement
      parts is an integral part of the Company's business.

           The Company's seveneight manufacturing subsidiaries are: (i) Astec, Inc.,
      which manufactures a  line of hot-mix  asphalt plants, soil  purification
      and environmental  remediation  equipment and  related  components;  (ii) Telsmith, Inc., which manufactures aggregate 
processing equipment for the production and classification of sand, 
gravel, and crushed stone for road and other construction 
applications; (iii)
      Heatec, Inc., which manufactures thermal oil heaters, asphalt heaters and
      other heat transfer equipment used in the Company's asphalt mixing plants
      and in other industries; (iii) CEI Enterprises, Inc., which  manufactures
      heat transfer equipment and recycled rubber blending systems for the hot-
      mix asphalt industry; (iv)  Telsmith, Inc., which manufactures  aggregate
      processing equipment  for  the  production and  classification  of  sand,
      gravel, and crushed stone for  road and other construction  applications;
      (v)  Kolberg-Pioneer,  Inc.,  which  manufactures  aggregate   processing
      equipment for the crushed stone, manufactured sand, recycle, top soil and
      remediation markets;  (vi) Production  Engineered Products,  Inc.,  which
      designs, manufactures and  markets high-frequency  vibrating screens  for
      sand and  gravel  and  asphalt operations;  (vii)  Roadtec,  Inc.,  which
      manufactures milling  machines  used  to recycle  asphalt  and  concrete,
      asphalt paving  equipment  and  material transfer  vehicles;  (v)and  (viii)
      Trencor, Inc., which manufactures chain and wheel trenching equipment and
      excavating equipment and log loaders; 
(vi) CEI Enterprises, Inc., which manufactures heat transfer 
equipment and recycled rubber blending systems for the hot-mix 
asphalt industry; and (vii) Production Engineered Products, Inc. 
("PEP"), which designs, manufactures and markets high-frequency 
vibrating screens for sand and gravel customers, as well as 
customers engaged in asphalt production.  In addition, PEP 
incorporates the high-frequency screens in portable crushing and 
screening plants serving the aggregate and industrial markets.equipment.

           Astec Financial Services, Inc. ("AFS"), was formed in June 1996 as  a
      wholly-owned subsidiary  of  the  Company to  provide  a  wide  range  of
      financing products  for leasing  or  acquiring the  Company's  equipment.
      AFS, a captive finance company, is dedicated to working exclusively  with
      all the CompanyCompany's subsidiaries and their customers in arranging financing
      for the Company's equipment.  AFS provides loans, operating leases, floor
      plans for dealers, fleet rental plans, and other financing plans to  meet
      the needs of the industry.
                                         1

           In  1996,  we also began operations atthe  Company  became   a  50%  shareholder  of   Pavement
      Technology, Inc.  ("PTI"), located  in Conyers,  Georgia.   The Company is a 50% 
shareholder of PTI  ,  which
      manufactures an asphalt pavement analyzer,analyzers,  vibratory compactorcompactors and  packagesother
      mix-design laboratory products  that allowsallow  our customercustomers  to purchase  a
      complete design  laboratory  from  one source.    The  pavement  analyzer
      technology  has   captured  the   interest   of  state   departments   of
      transportation and universities as a new standard for measuring  rutting,
      fatigue, and  water  susceptibility in  hot-mix  asphalt.   The  pavement
      technology product line addsadded a completely new dimension to the  services
      and equipment we are able to provide our customers.

           The Company's strategy is to become the high quality, low 
costlow-cost producer in each of
      its product  lines for  any given  product  while continuing  to  develop
      innovative  new  products  and  provide  first  class  service  for   its
      customers.  Management  believes that  the Company  is the  technological
      innovator in the markets in which it operates.  Management believes  that
      the Company is well positioned to  capitalize on the need to rebuild  and
      enhance roadway infrastructure, both in the United States and abroad.

                    Disposition of Foreign Operating Subsidiaries

           As previously disclosed, due to  the disposition of Wibau-Astec  and
      the abandonment of Astec-Europa, the  Company no longer conducts  foreign
      manufacturing operations and  instead has decided  to concentrate all  of
      its manufacturing  activities, whether  or not  related to  international
      sales, with its more efficient domestic operations.

                                      Products

           The Company operates predominantly in a single-business segment.  In
      19961997 it manufactured and marketed products in five principal  categories:
      (i)  hot-mix  asphalt   plants,  soil   purification  and   environmental
      remediation equipment  and  related  components; (ii)  hot  oil  heaters,
      asphalt heaters  and  other  heat transfer  equipment;  (iii)  aggregates
      processing  equipment;  (iv)  mobile  construction  equipment,  including
      asphalt pavers, milling machines and material transfer vehicles and other
      auxiliary 
equipment; (iii) hot oil heaters, asphalt heaters and other heat transfer 
equipment; (iv) aggregates processing equipment; and  (v) chain  and wheel  trenching and  excavating
      equipment.   The  following table  shows  the Company's  sales  for  each

      product category which accounted for 10% or more of consolidated  revenue
      for the periods indicated.
                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                             1997        1996       1995           1994
                                                     (In thousands)
         Asphalt plants and components       $117,849    $93,786    $110,321       $100,514
         Aggregate processing equipment        55,362     52,739      46,586         38,823
         Mobile construction equipment         49,704     37,845      29,706         30,291
         Trenching and excavating equipment    26,803     23,543      21,110         25,867

      Financial information  in  connection with  the  Company's  international
      sales is  included  in  Note  1413  to  "Notes  to  Consolidated  Financial
      Statements - Segment Information," appearing at Page A-11 of this report.

      Hot-mix Asphalt Plants

           Astec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a  complete
      line of portable, stationary and  relocatable hot-mix asphalt plants  and
      related components under the "ASTEC" trademark.  An asphalt mixing  plant
      typically consists of  heating and storage  equipment for liquid  asphalt
      (manufactured by Heatec), cold feed bins  for storing aggregates, a  drum
      mixer for drying, heating and mixing, a baghouse composed of air  filters
      and other  pollution  control devices,  hot  storage bins  or  silos  for
      temporary storage of hot-mix  asphalt and a control  house.  The  Company
      introduced the  concept  of  plant portability  in  1979.    Its  current
      generation of portable asphalt plants is  marketed as the "Six Pack"Six PackTM  and
      consists of six portable components which  can be disassembled and  moved
      to  the  construction  site  to   reduce  relocation  expenses.     Plant
      portability represents an industry innovation developed and  successfully
      marketed by the Company.  In 1996, Astec, Inc. developed an improved version of the "Six Pack"Six  PackTM
      plant was  developed,  making the new "Six Pack"it  considerably  more portable  and  self-
      erecting.  This design  will eliminateeliminated the use of  cranes for disassembly  or
      erection.  The enhanced version of the "Six Pack,"Six PackTM, known as the Turbo 400,Six
      PackTM, is capable of producing 400 tons-per-hour of hot-mix 
asphalt.  Thisa  highly portable plant  which is especially  useful in  less
      populated areas where plants must be moved from job to job.

           The components in the Company'sAstec's asphalt mixing plants are fully  automated
      and use  microprocessor-based control  systems for  efficient  operation.
      The plants are manufactured to meet or exceed federal and state clean air
      standards.

           The  Company  has  also  developed  specialized  asphalt   recycling
      equipment for use with its hot-mix asphalt plants.  Many of theits  existing Astec
      products are  suited for  blending, vaporizing,  drying and  incinerating
      contaminated products.   As  a  result, Astec  Inc. has  developed a  line  of
      thermal  purification  equipment   for  the   remediation  of   petroleum
      contaminated soil.



Mobile Construction Equipment

	Roadtec, Inc., designs, engineers, manufactures and markets 
asphalt pavers, material transfer vehicles, and milling machines.  
Roadtec engineers emphasize simplicity, productivity, versatility and 
accessibility in product design and use.

	Asphalt Pavers.  Asphalt pavers are used in the application of 
hot-mix asphalt to the road surface.  Roadtec pavers have been 
designed to minimize maintenance costs while exceeding road 
surface smoothness requirements.  Roadtec manufactures one paver 
model which must be used with a material transfer vehicle described 
below.

	Material Transfer Vehicles.  The patented "Shuttle Buggy"TM is 
a mobile, self-propelled material transfer vehicle which allows 
continuous paving by separating truck unloading from the paving 
process while remixing the asphalt surface material.  A typical asphalt 
paver must stop paving to permit truck unloading of asphalt mix.  By 
permitting continuous paving, the "Shuttle Buggy" TM allows the asphalt 
paver to produce a smoother road surface.  As a result of the 
pavement smoothness achieved with this machine, certain states are 
now requiring the use of the "Shuttle Buggy" TM on their jobs.

	Milling Machines.  Roadtec milling machines are designed to 
remove old asphalt from the road surface before new asphalt mix is 
applied.  They are manufactured with a simplified control system, wide 
conveyors, direct drives and a wide range of horsepower and cutting 
capabilities to provide versatility in product application.  Additional 
upgrades and options were added in 1996 to enhance the products 
and their capabilities.

      Heat Transfer Equipment

           Heatec, Inc., designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a variety
      of heaters  and heat  transfer processing  equipment under  the  "HEATEC"
      trade name for use in various industries, including the asphalt industry.

           CEI Enterprises, Inc.  (CEI), designs,  engineers, manufactures  and
      markets heating equipment and storage tanks mainly for the asphalt paving
      industry.

           Asphalt Heating Equipment.  Heatec  manufactures a complete line  of
      heating and liquid  storage equipment  for the  asphalt paving  industry.
      Heaters are offered in  both direct-fired and  helical coil models  while
      CEI's heating  equipment is  hot  oil, direct  fired  or electric.    The
      equipment includes portable and stationary tank models with capacities up
      to 35,000 gallons each.

           Industrial Heating  Equipment.   Heatec  builds  a wide  variety  of
      industrial heaters  to  fit  a broad  range  of  applications,  including
      equipment for  emulsion  plants,  roofing  material  plants,  refineries,
      chemical processing, rubber plants and the agribusiness.  Heatec has  the
      technical  staff  to  custom  design  heating  systems  and  has  systems
      operating as large as 40,000,000 BTU's per hour.

      AggregatesAggregate Processing Equipment

           Founded in 1906, Telsmith, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets a
      complete line of aggregate and  mineral processing equipment and  related
      machinery under the "TELSMITH" trademark  for the mining, quarrying,  and
      sand and gravel industries worldwide.   Telsmith's products include  jaw,
      cone, and impact crushers;  several types of  feeders which move  virgin,
      recycled, or crushed material to primary, secondary, or tertiary crushing
      equipment; vibrating  screens  to  separate the  aggregate  into  various
      sizes;  and  washing  and  conveying  equipment.    In  metallic   mining
      operations, Telsmith equipment is used  in primary crushing stages  after
      the material has been blasted from  the deposit.  Secondary and  tertiary
      crushing equipment, as well as vibrating screens, are employed in systems
      to reduce the material down to sizes for grinding mill feed or leech  bed
      processes.

           Equipment furnished  by  Telsmith  can be  purchased  as  individual
      components,  as  portable  plants  for  flexibility,  or  as   completely
      engineered systems for both portable and stationary applications.

           In 1994, Telsmith received ISO 9001 certification, the international
      standard of  quality assurance  in the  design, development,  production,
      installation and  servicing of  Telsmith's  products.   This  designation
      recognizes the  quality of  its products  and services  in the  worldwide
      marketplace.

           Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. ("K-P") designs,  manufactures and supports  a
      complete line of aggregate processing equipment for the sand and  gravel,
      mining, quarry and concrete recycle markets.  The product range  includes
      feeders,  crushers,  classifying  tanks,  material  washers,   conveyors,
      portable screening plants and pugmills.

           Rock Crushers.   Kolberg-Pioneer rock crushers  are used by  mining,
      quarry and  sand and  gravel producers  to crush  oversized aggregate  to
      salable size.  Types of crushers include compression (jaw, cone and roll)
      and impact (vertical shaft and horizontal  shaft).  Models are  available
      for primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary applications.
           Feeders.   Feeders  are used  to  transfer aggregate  into  crushing
      operations.  Crusher efficiency is increased as fines bypass the crusher.
      Styles include vibrating grizzly, apron, pan and belt feeders.
           Sand Classifying Tanks.   These tanks are  used to clean,  segregate

      and re-blend natural or  manufactured sand to  meet the fineness  modulus
      (FM) and  sand equivalent  (SE) specifications  for concrete,  mason  and
      other sand products.

           Washers and Blademills.   These provide aggressive scrubbing  action
      to remove unwanted clays, silts  and foreign materials from  contaminated
      aggregate deposits.

           Conveyors.  Kolberg-Pioneer manufactures conveyors designed to  move
      or store aggregate and other bulk materials, typically in a radial  cone-
      shaped stockpile.  Models offered include road portable, stationary,  and
      overland styles.

           Portable Recycling Plants.   Portable recycling  plants are used  to
      reclaim aggregate from concrete,  construction and demolition debris  and
      asphalt, while separating metal contaminants.

           Portable Screening Plants.  These are used by aggregate and top soil
      producers to separate materials by size.  They adapt easily  to  multiple
      applications by  changing  the  screen cloth.    An  optional  hammermill
      shredder conditions  dry  material for  more  efficient screening.    The
      optional wet deck, when  used with a fine  material washer, replicates  a
      low-cost washing plant.

           Pugmills.  Kolberg-Pioneer pugmills are highly efficient  homogenous
      mixing chambers consisting of twin shafts with timed, overlapping paddles
      used for  soil remediation,  cement-treated  base and  cold-mix  asphalt.
      Pugmills are  typically combined  with either  a  bulk storage  silo  for
      introducing dry additives or a pump for liquids.


           Production Engineered Products, Inc. ("PEP") designs,  manufactures,
      and  markets  high-frequency  vibrating  screens  for  sand  and   gravel
      customers, as  well  as customers  engaged  in asphalt  production.    In
      addition, PEP  incorporates  the  high-frequency  screens  into  portable
      crushing and  screening  plants  serving  the  aggregate  and  industrial
      markets.

      Mobile Construction Equipment

           Roadtec, Inc., designs, engineers, manufactures and markets  asphalt
      pavers, material  transfer  vehicles,  and  milling  machines.    Roadtec
      engineers   emphasize   simplicity,    productivity,   versatility    and
      accessibility in product design and use.
           Asphalt Pavers.  Asphalt pavers are used in the application of  hot-
      mix asphalt to the  road surface.  Roadtec  pavers have been designed  to
      minimize  maintenance  costs  while  exceeding  road  surface  smoothness
      requirements.  Roadtec manufactures  one paver model  which must be  used
      with a material transfer vehicle described below.
           Material Transfer  Vehicles.    The patented  Shuttle  BuggyR  is  a
      mobile, self-propelled material transfer vehicle which allows  continuous
      paving by  separating  truck  unloading from  the  paving  process  while
      remixing the asphalt surface material.  A typical asphalt paver must stop
      paving  to  permit  truck  unloading  of  asphalt  mix.    By  permitting

      continuous paving, the Shuttle BuggyR allows the asphalt paver to produce
      a smoother road surface.  As a result of the pavement smoothness achieved
      with this  machine, certain  states  are now  requiring  the use  of  the
      Shuttle BuggyR on their jobs.   Recent studies using infrared  technology
      have revealed  problems caused  by differential  cooling of  the  hot-mix
      during hauling.   The Shuttle BuggyR  remixes the material  to a  uniform
      temperature, eliminating the problem.

           Milling Machines.  Roadtec milling  machines are designed to  rmove
      old asphalt from  the road  surface beforee  new asphalt  mix is  applied.
      They are manufactured with a  simplified control system, wide  conveyors,
      direct drives and a wide range o horsepower and cutting capabilities  to
      provide versatility  in product  application.   Additional  upgrades  and
      options are available to enhance the products and their capabilities.

      Trenching and Excavating Equipment

           Trencor, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets chain and
      wheel trenching equipment, canal excavators, rock saws and road miners and log-loading equipment.miners.

           Chain Trenchers.  Trencor chain  trenching machines utilize a  heavy
      duty chain (equipped with cutting teeth attached to steel plates) wrapped
      around a long moveable boom.  These machines, with weights up to  400,000
      pounds, are capable of cutting a trench up to eight feet wide and thirtythirty-
      five feet deep  through rock.   Trencor also  makes foundation  trenchers
      used in areas where drilling and blasting are prohibited.

           Wheel Trenchers.    Trencor wheel  trenching  machines are  used  in
      pipeline excavation in soil and soft rock.  The wheel trenchers weigh  up
      to 390,000 pounds and have a trench capacity of up to seven feet in width
      and ten feet in depth.

           Canal Excavator.Excavators.    Trencor  canal  excavators  are  used  to  make
      finished  and  trimmed   trapezoidal  canal   excavations  within   close
      tolerances.  The canals are primarily used for irrigation systems.

           Rock Saws.  Trencor  manufactures a rock saw  which is utilized  for
      laying water and gas  lines and fiber  opticsoptic cable, constructing  highway
      drainage systems and for other applications.

           Roadminers.  Trencor manufactures four "Road Miner"Road MinerTM models  weighing
      up to 400,000 pounds with an attachment which allows it to cut a path  up
      to twelve and a half feet wide and five feet deep on a single pass.   The
      RoadminerRoad MinerTM has applications  in the road  construction industry and  in
      mining and aggregatesaggregate processing operations.

           Log Loaders.Material Processors.  Trencor also manufactures several different 
models of log loaders.  Its products include mobile/truck mounted 
models, as well as track mounted and stationary models, each of 
which is used in harvesting and processing wood products.  The 
equipment is sold under the "Log Hog" name.  In 1996, due to the 
depressed nature of the timber industry as a whole and the resulting 
price competition it created, the Company made a decision to de-
emphasize this product line and reallocate resources to strengthen 
Trencor's core product lines.  

	Material Processor.  During 1996, Trencor developed a machine which  includes
      a crusher that operates independently from  the trencher to process  rock
      and related material (spoil) removed from the trench to make it  suitable
      for use as a filler around pipes, cables or other lines being  installed.
      Patents are pending on this product.

                                    Manufacturing

           The Company manufactures  many of  the component  parts and  related
      equipment for  its  products.    In  many  cases,  the  Company  designs,
      engineers and manufactures custom component  parts and equipment to  meet
      the particular needs of  individual customers.  Manufacturing  operations
       during 19961997  took  place  at eightnine  separate  locations.    The  Company's
      manufacturing  operations   consist   primarily  of   fabricating   steel
      components and the assembly and testing of its products to ensure quality
      control standards have been achieved.

                                      Marketing

           The   Company   markets   its   products   both   domestically   and
      internationally.   The principal  purchasers  of the  Company's  products
      include highway  and heavy  equipment contractors,  utility  contractors,
      pipeline contractors, open mine  operators, quarry operators and  foreign
      and domestic governmental agencies.   Astec, Inc.  sells directly to  its
      customers  with  domestic,  soil  remediation  and  international   sales
      departments.   Telsmith products  are sold  through  twoa leased  branch  locations in San Francisco, California, and
      Walpole, Massachusetts, as well as through a combination of direct sales,
      both domestic and international, and dealer  sales.  Roadtec and  Trencor
      share a warehouse facility in Aurora, Illinois, that supports both  their
      product lines.  Heatec, CEI, Roadtec,  and Trencor products are  marketed
      through a combination of direct sales and dealer sales.  Approximately 18
      manufacturers' representatives sell Heatec  products for applications  in
      industries other than  the asphalt  industry with  such sales  comprising
      approximately 3038 percent of  Heatec's sales volume  during 1996.1997.   Direct
      sales  employees  are  paid  salaries  and  are  generally  entitled   to
      commissions after  obtaining  certain  sales quotas.    See  "Business  -
      Properties."

           The Company's international  sales efforts  are decentralized,  with
      each subsidiary  maintaining  responsibility for  its  own  international
      marketing efforts.


                          Seminars and Technical Bulletins

           The Company  periodically conducts  technical and  service  seminars
      which are  primarily for  contractors, employees  and owners  of  asphalt
      mixing plants.  In 1996,1997, approximately 238419 representatives of contractors
      and owners  of  hot-mix asphalt  plants  attended seminars  held  by  the
      Company in Chattanooga, Tennessee.  These  seminars, which are taught  by
      Company management and  employees, cover  a range  of subjects  including
      technological innovations in the  hot-mix asphalt, businessaggregate  processing,
      paving, milling, and  other industry 
segmentsrecycle markets in  which the Company  manufactures
      products.

           The Company also sponsors executive  seminars for the management  of
      the customers of Astec,  Inc.  The seminars  are taught primarily by  the
      management of the Company,  but outside speakers are  also utilized.   FiveIn
      1997, approximately 331 participants  attended seminars with up to eighty participants each are 
being held in 1997 inat the  newly constructed,Company's
      state-of-the-art training center at Astec, Inc.center.

           In addition to the seminars, the Company publishes a number of detailed technical
      bulletins coveringdetailing various technological and business issues relating to
      the asphalt industry.

           The Company sponsors Paving Professionals workshops at its  training
      center for customers or  potential customers of Roadtec,  Inc.  In  1997,
      240 attended  these classroom  sessions.   Actual  equipment  application
      experience was  provided  at  the Roadtec  facility.    Service  training
      seminars were also held at the Roadtec facility for 320 customer  service
      representatives.

           In 1997,  Telsmith had  technical seminars  for 85  English-speaking
      customer  representatives  and  another  multi-lingual  seminar  with  40
      attendees.


                               Patents and Trademarks

           The Company seeks to obtain patents to protect the novel features of
      its products.  The  Company and its subsidiaries  hold 65101 United  States
      patents and 6357 foreign patents.   There are eight47 United States and four  foreign
      patent applications pending.

           The Company and  its subsidiaries have  approximately 4037  trademarks
      registered in the  United States,  including logos  for Astec,  Telsmith,
      Roadtec and  Trencor, and  the names  ASTEC, TELSMITH,  HEATEC,  LOG HOG, ROADTEC,
      TRENCOR and TRENCOR.  ManyKOLBERG.   Ten  of these  trademarks are  also registered  in
      foreign countries, including Canada,  Great Britain, Mexico, New  Zealand
      and Australia.Indonesia.  The Company has five trademark applications pending.

           The Company and  its subsidiaries also  license their technology  to
      manufacturers.

                         Engineering and Product Development

           The Company dedicates substantial  resources to its engineering  and
      product  development.    At  December  31,  1996,1997,  the  Company  and  its
      subsidiaries had  103171  full-time  individuals  employed  domestically  in
      engineering and design capacities.


                                    Raw Materials

           Raw materials used by the Company in the manufacture of its products
      include carbon steel and various types of alloy steel, which are normally
      purchased from steel mills and other sources.

                               Seasonality and Backlog

           The Company's business  is somewhat seasonal.   The Company's  sales
      tend to  be  stronger from  January  through  June each  year,  which  is
      attributable  largely  to  orders  placed   in  the  fourth  quarter   in
      anticipation of warmer summer months when most asphalt paving is done.

           As of December 31, 1996,1997, the  Company had a backlog for delivery  of
      products at certain dates in the future of approximately $44,911,000.$61,387,000.  At
      December 31, 1995,1996, the total backlog, updated to include Kolberg-Pioneer,
      Inc., was approximately $34,751,000.$54,298,000.  The Company's backlog is subject to
      some seasonality, as noted above.

           The Company's contracts reflected in the  backlog are not, by  their
      terms, subject to termination.  Management  believes that the Company  is
      in substantial compliance with all manufacturing and delivery  timetables
      relating to its products.

                                     Competition

           The Company faces strong competition  in price, service and  product
      performance in each product category.  While the Company does not compete
      with any one manufacturer in all of its product lines, it competes as  to
      certain products with both  large publicly-held companies with  resources
      significantly greater  than  those of  the  Company and  various  smaller
      manufacturers.     Hot-mix   asphalt  plant   competitors   include   CMI
      Corporation; Cedarapids,  Inc., a  subsidiary  of Raytheon  Company;  and
      Gencor Industries, Inc.  Paving equipment competitors include Caterpillar
      Paving Products  Inc.,  a  subsidiary  of  Caterpillar,  Inc.;  Blaw-Knox
      Construction Equipment Company, a  subsidiary of Clark Equipment Co.; Ingersoll-Rand  Company;
      and Cedarapids, Inc.

           The market  for the  Company's heat  transfer equipment  is  diverse
      because of the  multiple applications  for such  equipment.   Its 
principal competitor isCompetitors
      include Gencor/Hyway Heat  Systems.Systems, Sundance,  American Heating,  Gentec,
      and First Thermal.  The  Company's milling machine equipment  competitors
      include  Ingersoll-Rand  Company;  CMI  Corporation;  Cedarapids,   Inc.;
      Caterpillar;Caterpillar, Inc.;  and  Wirtgen  America,  Inc.    AggregatesAggregate  processing
      equipment  competitors   include   the Pioneer Division of Portec,Nordberg,  Inc.;   Nordberg,Cedarapids,   Inc.;
      Powerscreen; Deister;  Seco/Hewitt  Robins;  Eagle  Iron  Works;  Boliden Allis, a member of the Trelleborg Group; Cedarapids, Inc.;Finley;
      Universal; Svedala;  Greystone  and  other  smaller  manufacturers,  both
      domestic and foreign.  Competition for sales of trenching and  excavating
      equipment includes  Ditch Witch;  J.I. Case;  Tesmec; Vermeer  and  other
      smaller manufacturers in the small utility trencher market.   Astec Financial Services competitors 
areCompetitors
      of  the  captive   finance  company  include   General  Electric   Credit
      Corporation, The CIT Group, and Safeco  Credit Company, Inc., as well  as
      local financial institutions.

           As a whole, imports do not constitute significant competition in the
      United States;  however, in  international sales,  the Company  generally
      competes with foreign manufacturers  which may have  a local presence  in
      the market the Company is attempting to penetrate.

           Asphalt and concrete are  generally considered competitive  products
      as a  surface choice  for new  roads  and highways.    A portion  of  the
      interstate highway system  is paved in  concrete, but a  majority of  all
      surfaced roads in  the United States  are paved with  asphalt.   Although
      concrete is  used  for  some  new road  surfaces,  asphalt  is  used  for
      virtually all resurfacing, even the  resurfacing of most concrete  roads.
      Management does  not  believe that  concrete,  as a  competitive  surface
      choice, materially impacts the Company's business prospects.

                                     RegulationRegulations

           The Company does  not operate  within a  highly regulated  industry.
      However, air pollution equipment manufactured by the Company, principally
      for  hot-mix  asphalt  plants,  must  comply  with  certain   performance
      standards promulgated  by  the federal  Environmental  Protection  Agency
      under the  Clean Air  Act  applicable to  "new  sources" or  new  plants.
      Management  believes  that  the  Company's  products  meet  all  material
      requirements of  such  regulations  and  of  applicable  state  pollution
      standards and environmental protection laws.

           In addition, due to  the size and weight  of certain equipment,  the
      Company  and   its  customers   sometimes  confront   conflicting   state
      regulations on maximum weights transportable on highways and roads.  This
      problem occurs most frequently in the movement of portable asphalt mixing
      plants.  Also, some  states have regulations  governing the operation  of
      asphalt mixing plants and  most states have  regulations relating to  the
      accuracy of weights and measures which affect some of the control systems
      manufactured by the Company.

                                      Employees


           On August 3, 1995, a union  representation election was held at  the
      Trencor plant and a unit of Trencor production and maintenance  employees
      voted to be represented  by the United  States Steelworkers of  American,
      AFL-CIO, CLC.  Trencor has filed a Petition for Review with the United States
      Court of Appeals for  the Fifth Circuit and  requested that the  National
      Labor Relation Board's certification of the election be overturned due to
      alleged improper activity  by the union.   Trencor has requested  that a  new
      representation election  be held.   The proceeding currently is pending beforeRecently,  in response  to  Trencor's
      appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.Circuit returned
      the matter to  the National  Labor Relations  Board and  ordered that  an
      evidentiary  hearing   on  Trencor's   complaints  be   held  before   an
      administrative law judge.  That hearing was held on January 15, 1998 with
      the administrative law judge  rejecting Trencor's claims.   Consequently,
      Trencor has appealed the decision to  the National Labor Relations  Board
      where it is still pending.

           At December 31, 1996,1997 the Company and its subsidiaries employed 1,4571,925
      persons, of which 9161,435 were engaged in manufacturing operations, 138171  in
      engineering, including support staff, and 403319 in selling,  administrative
      and management functions.   Telsmith has  a labor  agreement expiring  on
      October 14, 1998.  Except as set forth above, none of the Company's other
      employees   are   covered   by   a   collective   bargaining   agreement.
      Notwithstanding the current preceding before the United States Court of Appeals for 
the Fifth Circuit,National Labor Relations
      Board, the Company considers its employee relations to be good.


      Item 2.  Properties


           The location,  approximate  square  footage,  acreage  occupied  and
      principal function of the properties owned  or leased by the Company  are
      set forth below:

                               Approximate Approximate
           Location            Square Footage   	AcreageFootageAcreage       Principal Function


      Chattanooga, Tennessee              361,000       59.1     Corporate and
      sub-
                                                        sidiaryTennessee                                        subsidiary offices,
                                                       manufacturing - Astec

      Chattanooga, Tennessee                ---         63.0     Storage yard - Astec
      Tennessee
      Chattanooga,               Tennessee  66,20084,200        5.0     Offices,
      manufact-
                                                        uringTennessee                                        manufacturing -
                                                       Heatec
      Chattanooga,              Tennessee  135,000       15.1     Offices,
      manufact-
                                                        uringTennessee                                        manufacturing -
                                                       Roadtec

      Chattanooga, Tennessee                1,820      ---       Offices leased for
      Tennessee                                        Astec Financial
                                                       Services

      Inc.

North        Aurora, Illinois       16,700        3.5     Roadtec and Trencor
      Illinois                                         (sales and service
                                                       office)

San Francisco, 
     California         550                 1.0         Leased sales and 
                                                        service office - 
                                                        Telsmith

      Mequon, Wisconsin         203,000       30.0     Offices and
                                                       manufact-
                                                        uringmanufacturing -
                                                       Telsmith

      Walnut, Illinois           28,00028,770        3.0     Leased offices and
                                                       manufacturing - PEP

      Rossville, Georgia         40,500        2.6     Manufacturing - Astec

      Grapevine, Texas          175,513       51.67    Offices,
                                                       manufact-
                                                        uringmanufacturing -
                                                       Trencor

      Walpole, 
     Massachusetts                    1,800      ---       Leased sales and
      Massachusetts                                    service office -
                                                       Telsmith

      Odessa, Texas               4,072         0.8.8     Sales office and
                                                       parts warehouse -
                                                       Trencor

      Inman,         South       Carolina           13,600        8.0     Leased until
      Carolina                                         September 30, 2000
                                                       with option to buy
                                                       (office and warehouse
                                                       of former Soil
                                                       Purification of
                                                       Carolina, Inc.)

      Houston, Texas           120               ---          Leased sales office -
                                                        Heatec

Albuquerque, New Mexico          110,700       14.0     Offices and
      manufact-
                                                        uringMexico                                           manufacturing - CEI

      Yankton, South            252,000       50.0     Offices and
      Dakota                                           manufacturing -
                                                       Kolberg-Pioneer

           Management believes that each  of the Company's facilities  provides
      office  or  manufacturing  space  suitable  for  its  current  needs  and
      considers the terms under which it leases facilities to be reasonable.

      Item 3. Legal Proceedings

           Management has reviewed all claims and lawsuits and, upon the advice
      of counsel, has  made provision for  any estimable  losses; however,  the
      Company is  unable to  predict the  ultimate outcome  of the  outstanding
      claims and lawsuits.


      Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


           None.


      Executive Officers of the Registrant


           The name,  title,  ages and  business  experience of  the  executive
      officers of the Company are listed below.

           J. Don Brock, Ph.D., P.E., has been President and a directorDirector of  the
      Company since  its  incorporation  in 1972  and  assumed  the  additional
      position of Chairman of the Board in 1975.   He was the Treasurer of  the
      Company from 1972 until 1994.  From 1969 to 1972, Dr. Brock was President
      of the Asphalt Division of CMI  Corporation.  Dr. Brock earned his  Ph.D.
      degree  in  mechanical   engineering  from  the   Georgia  Institute   of
      Technology.  Dr. Brock and Thomas R. Campbell, President of Roadtec,  are
      first cousins.  Dr. Brock is 58.59.

           Richard W. Bethea, Jr., became Vice President, Corporate Counsel and
      Secretary on February 1, 1997.
      Mr. Bethea  has  been  a  practicing  lawyer  since  1978.    He  has  an
      undergraduate degree  in  accounting  from  the  University  of  Georgia.
      Before joining the  Company, Mr. Bethea  was a  member (stockholder)  and
      partner with  the law  firm Stophel  & Stophel,  P. C.,  in  Chattanooga,
      Tennessee.  He has served as the Company's litigation counsel since 1983.
      He is 44.45.

           F.  McKamy  Hall,  a   Certified  Public  Accountant,  hasbecame   Vice
      President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer in April 1997 and served as
      Controller of the Company since  May 1987.  From  1985 to 1987, Mr.  Hall
      was Vice President-FinancePresident of Finance at Quadel Management Corporation, a company
      engaged in real estate management.  Mr. Hall has an undergraduate  degree
      in accounting and  a Master of  Business Administration  degree from  the
      University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.  He is 54.55.

           W. Norman Smith  has served as  the President of  Astec, Inc.  since
      December 1, 1994.  He formerly  served as President of Heatec, Inc.,  from
      1977 to 1994.  From 1972 to 1977, Mr. Smith was a Regional Sales  Manager
      with the Company.  From 1969 to 1972, Mr. Smith was an engineer with  the
      Asphalt Division of  CMI Corporation.   Mr. Smith  has also  served as  a
      director of the Company since 1972.  He is 57.58.

           Robert G. Stafford has served as  President of Telsmith, Inc.  since
      April 1991.  Between January 1987  and January 1991, Mr. Stafford  served
      as President of Telsmith, Inc., a subsidiary of Barber-
Greene.Barber-Greene.  From 1984
      until the Company's acquisition of Barber-Greene  in December 1986,   Mr.
      Stafford was Vice  President -  Operations of  Barber-Greene and  General
      Manager of Telsmith.  He became a director of the Company in March  1988.
      He is 5859.

           Thomas R. Campbell has  served as President  of Roadtec, Inc.  since
      1988.  From 1981 to 1988 he served as Operations Manager of Roadtec.  Mr.
      Campbell and J. Don Brock, President  of the Company, are first  cousins.
      Mr. Campbell is 47.48.

           Roger Sandberg  has  served  as President  of  Trencor,  Inc.,  since
      October 1, 1996.  Prior to that he served as Vice President of Sales  and
      Marketing at  Roadtec, Inc.  and Director  of Marketing  with Astec  Inc.
      Before  joining  the  Company,  Mr.  Sandberg  held  various   management
      positions with Cedarapids, Inc., and Standard Havens, Inc., since 1971.  He
      is 55.56.

           James G. May has served as President of Heatec, Inc. since  December
      1, 1994.  From 1984 until 1994 he served as Vice President of Engineering
      of Astec, Inc.  He is 52.53.

           Albert E. Guth has been President of Astec Financial Services,  Inc.
      since June 1996.   He served  as Chief Financial  Officer of the  Company
      from 1987  through  June  1996, as  Senior  Vice  President  since  1984,
      Secretary of the Company since 1972, and Treasurer since 1994.  Mr. Guth,
      who has been a director since 1972, was the Vice President of the Company
      from 1972 until 1984.  From 1969 to 1972, Mr. Guth was the Controller  of
      the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation.  He is 57.58.

           Richard A.  Patek  became  President  of  Kolberg-Pioneer,  Inc.  on
      December 2, 1997.  From 1995 to 1997, he served as Director of  Materials
      of Telsmith, Inc.  From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Patek was Director of Materials
      and Manufacturing of the former Milwaukee  plant location.  From 1978  to
      1992, he  held various  manufacturing management  positions at  Telsmith.
      Mr. Patek is a graduate of Milwaukee School of Engineering.  He is 41.


                                       PART II


      Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder
              Matters

           The Company's Common Stock is traded in the National Association  of
      Securities Dealers Automated  Quotation System  (NASDAQ) National  Market
      under the symbol "ASTE."  The Company has never paid any dividends on its
      Common Stock.

           The high  and low  sales prices  of the  Company's Common  Stock  as
      reported on the NASDAQ National Market  for each quarter during the  last
      two fiscal years, are as follows:

                                                   Price Per Share
                 1997                                High     Low
                1st Quarter                         10-1/8     8-1/4
                2nd Quarter                         12-7/8     9-5/8
                3rd Quarter                         17-3/4    12-5/16
                4th Quarter                         18-3/8    15-3/8

                                                      Price Per Share

                 1996                                High     Low

                1st Quarter                         10 5/10-5/8    9 1/9-1/8
                2nd Quarter                         11 1/11-1/8    8 1/8-1/4
                3rd Quarter                          9 1/9-1/8    8 1/8-1/8
                4th Quarter                          9 3/9-3/4    8-3/8 3/8

                                        		Price Per Share
	1995	                               High	              Low
	1st Quarter	                        14 1/4	            11
	2nd Quarter	                        13 1/8	            10 7/8
	3rd Quarter	                        11 3/4	            9 7/8
	4th Quarter	                        12 1/4	            9 3/4

      The number of holders of record of the Company's Common Stock as of March
      10, 19979, 1998 was 696.approximately 600.


      Item 6. Selected Financial Data


           Selected financial data appear on page A-1 of this Report.




      Item 7. Management's Discussion and  Analysis of Financial Condition
      and Results of Operations


           Management's discussion  and  analysis of  financial  condition  and
      results of operations appears on pages A-2 to A-5 of this Report.


      Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


           Financial statements and supplementary financial information  appear
      on pages A-6 to A-23 of this Report.


      Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements  with Accountants on Accounting
      and Financial Disclosure

           None required to be reported in this item.


                                      PART III

      Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

           Information regarding  the Company's  directors included  under  the
      caption "Election of Directors - Certain Information Concerning  Nominees
      and  Directors"  in  the  Company's  definitive  Proxy  Statement  to  be
      delivered to  the shareholders  of the  Company  in connection  with  the
      Annual Meeting  of  Shareholders  to  be  held  on  April  24, 1997,23,  1998,  is
      incorporated herein  by reference.   Required  information regarding  the
      Company's      executive       officers       is       contained       in
      Part I  of this  Report  under the  heading  "Executive Officers  of  the
      Registrant."  Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of  the
      Exchange Act is  included under "Election  of Directors  - Section  16(a)
      Filing Requirements" in the  Company's definitive Proxy Statement,  which
      is incorporated herein by reference.

      Item 11. Executive Compensation

           Information included  under the  caption, "Election  of Directors  -
      Executive Compensation" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be
      delivered to  the shareholders  of the  Company  in connection  with  the
      Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders  to  be  held  on  April  24, 199723,  1998  is
      incorporated herein by reference.

      Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

           Information included  under the  captions "Election  of Directors 
-  -
      Certain Information  Concerning  Nominees and  Directors,"  "Election  of
      Directors -  Common  Stock  Ownership of  Management"  and  "Election  of
      Directors - Common Stock Ownership of  Certain Beneficial Owners" in  the
      Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the  shareholders
      of the Company in connection with  the Annual Meeting of Shareholders  to
      be held on April 24, 199723, 1998 is incorporated herein by reference.

      Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

           On March  18, 1996,  Dr. J.  Don Brock,  Chairman of  the Board  and
      President of the Company loaned $1,178,000  to the Company to  supplement
      its working capital revolving  credit facility.   The Company executed  a
      demand note payable  to Dr. Brock  in connection with  this loan  bearing
      interest at a  rate equal to  that paid to  First Chicago  NBD under  the
      Company's unsecured revolving  line of  credit.   At the  time Dr.  Brock
      loaned these  funds to  the Company,  the Company's  outstanding  balance
      under its  $22,000,000 revolving  credit facility  was $9,605,000.    The
      Company was able to use the proceeds of the loan from Dr. Brock to reduce
      the amount outstanding under the credit facility.  As of December 31, 1996,The loan was repaid to
      Dr. Brock on January 6, 1997, along with interest of $73,135 has been 
accrued with respect to this loan.that date.



                                       PART IV



      Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K


           (a)(1)   The following  financial statements  and other  information
      appear in Appendix "A" to this Report and are filed as a part hereof:

           .    Selected Consolidated Financial Data.

           .    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
                Results of Operations.

           .    Report of Independent Auditors.

           .    Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 19961997 and 1995.1996.

           .    Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended  December
                31, 1997, 1996 1995 and 1994.1995.

           .    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'  Equity for the  Years
                Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 1995 and 1994.1995.

           .    Consolidated Statements  of  Cash  Flows for  the  Years  Ended
                December 31, 1997, 1996 1995 and 1994.1995.

           .    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

           (a)(2)  Other than as described below, Financial Statement Schedules
      are  not  filed  with  this  Report  because  the  Schedules  are  either
      inapplicable or the  required information is  presented in the  Financial
      Statements or Notes thereto.  The following Schedules appear in  Appendix
      "A" to this Report and are filed as a part hereof:

           .    ReportConsent of Independent Auditors.

           .    Schedule VIIIII - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

           (a)(3)  The following Exhibits*  are incorporated by reference  into
      or are filed with this Report:

               3.1        Restated Charter  of  the  Company  (incorporated  by
                          reference to the Company's Registration Statement  on
                          Form S-1, effective June 18, 1986, File No. 33-5348).

               3.2        Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of  the
                          Company,                                    effective
                          September 12, 1988 (incorporated by reference to  the
                          Company's Annual  Report on  Form 10-K  for the  year
                          ended December 31, 1988, File No. 0-14714).

               3.3        Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of  the
                          Company, effective  June  8,  1989  (incorporated  by
                          reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
                          for the year  ended December  31, 1989,  File No.  0-14714)0-
                          14714).

               3.4        Amended and  Restated  Bylaws  of  the  Company,
                          adopted March 14, 1990 (incorporated by reference  to
                          the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
                          ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-14714).

               4.1        Trust Indenture between  City of  Mequon and  Firstar
                          Trust Company, as  Trustee, dated as  of February  1,
                          1994 (incorporated  by  reference  to  the  Company's
                          Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended
                          December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

               4.2        Indenture of  Trust,  dated  April 1,  1994,  by  and
                          between Grapevine Industrial Development  Corporation
                          and Bank One, Texas, NA, as Trustee (incorporated  by
                          reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
                          for the year  ended December  31, 1993,  File No.  0-14714)0-
                          14714).

               4.3        Shareholder  Protection   Rights   Agreement,   dated
                          December 22, 1995 (incorporated  by reference to  the
                          Company's Current Report on  Form 8-K dated  December
                          22, 1995, 
     File No. 0-14714).

	10.29	Lease Agreement, dated as of 
       August 28, 1989, between Telsmith, 
       Inc., and Pine Hill Developers 
       (incorporated by reference to the 
       Company's Annual Report on Form 
       10-K for the year ended December 
       31, 1989, File No. 0-14714).

	10.57	License Agreement, dated July 2, 
       1992, between Telsmith, Inc. and 
       Gerlach Industries (incorporated by 
       reference to the Company's Annual 
       Report on Form 10-K for the year 
       ended December 31, 1992, File No. 0-14714).

              10.75       Loan Agreement between City of Mequon, Wisconsin  and
                          Telsmith,  Inc.  dated   as  of   February  1,   1994
                          (incorporated by  reference to  the Company's  Annual
                          Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December  31,
                          1993, File No. 0-14714).

              10.76       Credit Agreement by  and between  Telsmith, Inc.  and
                          M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank,  dated as of February  1,
                          1994 (incorporated  by  reference  to  the  Company's
                          Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended
                          December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

              10.77       Security Agreement by and between Telsmith, Inc.  and
                          M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank,  dated as of February  1,
                          1994 (incorporated  by  reference  to  the  Company's
                          Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended
                          December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

              10.78       Mortgage and Security Agreement and Fixture Financing
                          Statement by  and  between  Telsmith,  Inc.  and  M&I
                          Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1,  1994
                          (incorporated by  reference to  the Company's  Annual
                          Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December  31,
                          1993, File No. 0-14714).

              10.79       Guarantee of Astec Industries,  Inc. in favor of  M&I
                          Ilsley  Bank,   dated   as  of   February   1,   1994
                          (incorporated by  reference to  the Company's  Annual
                          Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December  31,
                          1993, File No. 0-14714).

              10.83       Loan Agreement  dated as  of April  1, 1994,  between
                          Grapevine  Industrial  Development  Corporation   and
                          Trencor,  Inc.  (incorporated  by  reference  to  the
                          Company's Annual  Report on  Form 10-K  for the  year
                          ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

              10.84       Letter of  Credit  Agreement, dated  April  1,  1994,
                          between  First   Chicago   NBD  and   Trencor,   Inc.
                          (incorporated by  reference to  the Company's  Annual
                          Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December  31,
                          1994, File No. 0-14714).

              10.85       Guaranty Agreement,  dated  April  1,  1994,  between
                          Astec Industries, Inc.  and Bank One,  Texas, NA,  as
                          Trustee (incorporated by  reference to the  Company's
                          Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended
                          December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

              10.86       Astec Guaranty,  dated April  29,  1994, of  debt  of
                          Trencor,  Inc.  in   favor  of   First  Chicago   NBD
                          (incorporated by  reference to  the Company's  Annual
                          Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December  31,
                          1994, File No. 0-14714).

              10.87       Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1994,  between
                          the Company and  First Chicago  NBD (incorporated  by
                          reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
                          for the year  ended December  31, 1994,  File No.  0-14714)0-
                          14714).

              10.89       Waiver for December 31, 1994, dated February 24, 1995
                          with respect to  First Chicago  NBD Credit  Agreement
                          dated July 20, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the
                          Company's Annual  Report on  Form 10-K  for the  year
                          ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

              10.90       First Amendment to Guaranty  of Payment, dated  March
                          21, 1995 by and between Heatec, Inc.; Roadtec,  Inc.;
                          Trencor, Inc.; Telsmith, Inc.; Astec  Transportation,
                          Inc.; ACI, Inc.; Astec, Inc.; CEI Enterprises,  Inc.;
                          and First Chicago NBD  (incorporated by reference  to
                          the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
                          ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714).

              10.91       First Amendment to  Credit Agreement,  dated May  22,
                          1995  between  the  Company  and  First  Chicago  NBD
                          (incorporated by  reference to  the Company's  Annual
                          Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December  31,
                          1995, File No. 0-14714).

              10.92       Second Amendment to  Guaranty of  Payment, dated  May
                          22, 1995 by and between Heatec, Inc.; Roadtec,  Inc.;
                          Trencor, Inc.; Telsmith, Inc.; Astec  Transportation,
                          Inc.; ACI, Inc.; Astec, Inc.; CEI Enterprises,  Inc.;
                          and First Chicago NBD  (incorporated by reference  to
                          the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
                          ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714).

              10.93       Guaranty   of   all   obligations   of   Astec-
       EuropaAstec-Europa
                          Strassenbaumaschinen GmbH executed by the Company  in
                          favor of  Bayerische Vereinsbank  Aktiengesellschaft,
                          dated December 6, 1995 (incorporated by reference  to
                          the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
                          ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714).

              10.94       Guaranty of a  DM3,000,000 credit  facility to  Gibat
                          Ohl  Ingenieurgesellschaft  fur  Anlagentechnik   mbH
                          executed by the Company in favor of Deutsche Bank AG,
                          dated December 13, 1995 (incorporated by reference to
                          the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
                          ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714).

              10.95       Waiver for December 31, 1995, dated November 10, 1995
                          with respect to  First Chicago  NBD Credit  Agreement
                          dated July  20,  1994, as  amended  (incorporated  by
                          reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
                          for the year  ended December  31, 1995,  File No.  0-14714)0-
                          14714).

              10.97       Limited Consent  of First  Chicago  NBD dated  as  of
                          March 21, 1995  related to the  acquisition of  Trace
                          Industries, Inc. and the assignment of certain assets
                          to Astec,  Inc.  (incorporated by  reference  to  the
                          Company's      Annual       Report      on       Form
                          10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1995, File  No.
                          0-14714).

              10.98       Supplemental   Executive   Retirement   Plan,   dated
                          February 1, 1996  to be  effective as  of January  1,
                          1995 (incorporated  by  reference  to  the  Company's
                          Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended
                          December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714).

              10.99       Trust  under  Astec  Industries,  Inc.   Supplemental
                          Retirement Plan, dated January 1, 1996  (incorporated
                          by reference to the  Company's Annual Report on  Form
                          10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1995, File  No.
                          0-14714).

              10.100	Demand note dated March 18, 1996 
        between the Company and the 
        Company's Chief Executive Officer, 
        Dr. J. Don Brock.

	10.101      Loan Agreement dated December  5, 1996 between  Astec
                          Financial Services, Inc. and The CIT  Group/Equipment
                          Financing, Inc. ("CIT")(_CIT_) (incorporated by reference to
                          the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
                          ended December 31, 1996, File No. 0-14714).

              10.102      Astec Industries,  Inc.  Guaranty dated  December  5,
                          1996  of  Line  of  Credit  Agreement  between  Astec
                          Financial Services, Inc. and The CIT  Group/Equipment
                          Finance.

	11	    Statement Regarding ComputationFinance (incorporated by  reference to the  Company's
                          Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended
                          December 31, 1996, File No. 0-14714).

              10.103      Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated  November
                          27,  1997  between   the  Company,  Astec   Financial
                          Services, Inc. and First Chicago NBD.

              10.104      Asset  Purchase  Agreement  dated  October  16,  1997
                          between Portec, Inc. and Astec Industries, Inc.

              10.105      Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement dated  December
                          2, 1997  by and  between Astec  Industries, Inc.  and
                          Portec, Inc.

              10.106      Revolving Line of Per Share Earnings.Credit Note dated December 2,  1997
                          between Kolberg-Pioneer,  Inc.  and  Astec  Holdings,
                          Inc.

              10.107      Guaranty  Joinder  Agreement   dated  December   1997
                          between Kolberg-Pioneer,  Inc.  and  Astec  Holdings,
                          Inc. in favor of the First National Bank of Chicago.

              22          Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

              23          Consent of Independent Auditors

           (b)	No reportsA report on Form 8-K werewas filed in the fourth quarter.on December 2, 1997.

           (c)The  Exhibits  to this  Report  are listed  under  Item  14(a)(3)
              above.

           (d)The  Financial  Statement Schedules  to  this Report  are  listed
              under Item 14(a)(2) above.

      *  The*The Exhibits are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
      Inapplicable Exhibits are not included in the list.


                                    APPENDIX "A"
                                         to
                             ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

                      ITEMS 8 and 14(a)(1) and (2), (c) and (d)

                          INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
                            FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


                               ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.


                Contents                                                Page


      Selected Consolidated Financial DataData.............................  A-1

      Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
      of OperationsOperations....................................................  A-2

      Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 19961997 and 19951996........  A-6

      Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1997,
           1996 1995 and 19941995...............................................  A-7

      Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended
           December 31, 1997,
           1996 1995 and 19941995...............................................  A-8

      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
           1997, 1996 1995 and 19941995.........................................  A-9

      Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.......................  A-11

      Report of Independent Auditors		                                       A-24Auditors...................................  A-23

      Schedule VIIIII   - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		                    A-25



ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.   

1996 ANNUAL REPORT

Astec Industries, Inc., through its seven manufacturing 
subsidiaries, designs, engineers, manufactures and markets 
equipment and components used in road building and various 
other construction activities.  The Company's products are used 
in each phase of road building, from quarrying and crushing the 
aggregate to application of the road surface. The Company also 
manufactures certain equipment and components unrelated to 
road construction, including trenching equipment, 
environmental remediation equipment, log handling equipment 
and industrial heat transfer equipment.   

The Company has been responsible for many technological and 
engineering innovations in the road building industry and 
presently holds 65 United States and 63 foreign patents and has 
eight domestic and four foreign patents pending. The Company 
currently manufactures over 140 different products which it 
markets both domestically and internationally.  In addition to 
plant and equipment sales, the Company manufactures and sells 
replacement parts for equipment in each of its product lines, 
which is an integral part of the Company's business.

The Company's eight subsidiaries are: (i) Astec, Inc., which 
manufactures a line of hot mix asphalt plants, soil purification 
and environmental remediation equipment and related 
components; (ii) Telsmith, Inc., which manufactures aggregate 
processing equipment for the production and classification of 
sand, gravel and crushed stone for road and other construction 
applications; (iii) Heatec, Inc., which manufactures thermal oil 
heaters, asphalt heaters and other heat transfer equipment used 
in the Company's asphalt mixing plants and in other industries; 
(iv) CEI Enterprises, Inc., which manufactures heating 
equipment, mixing equipment, agitating tanks and storage tanks 
used primarily in the asphalt paving industry; (v) Roadtec, Inc., 
which manufactures reclaiming equipment used to recycle 
asphalt and concrete, asphalt paving equipment and material 
transfer vehicles; (vi) Trencor, Inc., which manufactures chain 
and wheel trenching equipment, excavating equipment, and 
logging equipment; (vii) Production Engineered Products, Inc., 
which designs, manufactures, and markets high-frequency 
vibrating screens for sand and gravel and asphalt operations; 
and (viii) Astec Financial Services, Inc., which provides a wide 
range of financial services for financing the purchase of Astec 
products for Astec's customers.

The principal purchasers of the Company's products for road 
building and related construction activities include highway and 
heavy equipment contractors, utility contractors, pipeline 
contractors, open mine operators, quarry operators and foreign 
and domestic governmental agencies.  International sales 
represented approximately 17.3% of net sales for 1996 and 
included sales in Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Middle East, 
Asia, Africa, Australia, South America and the West Indies.  


                            TABLE OF CONTENTS

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS	                         

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS	

CORPORATE OVERVIEW	                          

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Selected Consolidated Financial Data	        

Quarterly Financial Highlights	

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
	 and Results of Operations	

Consolidated Balance Sheets	

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'  Equity	

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	

Report of Independent Auditors	

Corporate Information	

Total sales for 1996 were $221,413,000 compared to 
$242,601,000 during 1995.  Income before income taxes for the 
year ended December 31, 1996 was $7,018,000 compared to 
$6,141,000 in 1995.  Net income for the year ended December 
31, 1996 was $4,345,000, or $0.43 per share, compared to 
$4,560,000, or $0.45 per share for 1995.  

We are not satisfied with the level of our profits during 1996, 
which were adversely affected by unusual events at our Trencor, 
Inc. subsidiary and a significant downturn in international sales 
of hot-mix asphalt plants and components at our Astec, Inc. 
subsidiary.

In an effort to diversify Trencor's product line, we acquired the 
Log Hog log loader line in early 1994 and produced a 
significant amount of inventory in anticipation of continued 
high demand in the timber industry.  Unfortunately, a 
significant and unexpected downturn in the paper industry, 
which produced a similar decline in the timber market, 
substantially reduced the demand for the log loaders.  This 
market downturn increased price competition to the point that in 
order to sell units we were experiencing unacceptable losses.  
Consequently, in December we decided it was in the best 
interest of the Company to de-emphasize this product line, 
reduce the investment in inventory, and reallocate these 
resources for further expansion of Trencor's core trencher 
business.  As a result, the appropriate writedowns on inventory 
were taken.  

We also decided to terminate Trencor's research and 
development of a large mining machine for use in rock quarries 
and surface mines.  After two years of experimentation with a 
prototype, we had doubts about the long-range cost 
effectiveness of the machine, so we felt that the project should 
be discontinued.  This decision allowed us to redirect our 
engineering resources to the trencher line to which three new 
models of trenchers were added in 1996.

In 1996, Astec, Inc. experienced an 11.3% increase in domestic 
sales compared to 1995, but these gains were not sufficient to 
offset a decrease of approximately $25 million in the cyclical 
and often unpredictable international market.  Also during 1996, 
Astec continued to be the industry's innovator in plant 
technology as it completed the development of a new Turbo 400 
ton per hour "Six Pack" plant, which we believe is the most 
portable high-production asphalt plant ever built.  

While 1996 was a disappointing year in terms of earnings, it 
was, nevertheless, a year of successes and great progress.  For 
example, the Telsmith operation realized many of the 
efficiencies we had hoped to achieve with our capital 
investments in state-of-the-art machine tools and expanded 
facilities.  In December, we completed the acquisition of 
Production Engineered Products, Inc. ("PEP") in Walnut, 
Illinois.  PEP manufactures and markets patented high-
frequency screening units for sand and gravel and asphalt 
operations.  PEP will be operated in conjunction with Telsmith.  
We believe the high-production capacity of the PEP screens will 
enhance sales of Telsmith's portable crushing plants and that 
Telsmith's experienced sales force will significantly increase 
sales in the PEP product lines. 

Roadtec, Inc. continued to be an innovator in the paver and 
milling machine markets and  introduced a new model of paver 
and a new model of our patented "Shuttle Buggy"TM which is 
a market leader in the material transfer vehicle market.

Heatec, Inc. also had a good year.  Even though sales of Astec, 
Inc., Heatec's largest customer, declined in 1996, Heatec's sales 
increased and it is currently adding to its manufacturing facility.  
We also acquired a new facility for CEI, Inc.  These additions 
should position Heatec and CEI for continuing growth, 
particularly in the western United States.

In a further effort to enhance the strength of our core businesses, 
during 1996 we formed a new subsidiary, Astec Financial 
Services, Inc., which will offer our customers access to capital 
financing through a lender that better understands the equipment 
being purchased and the road construction industry in general.  
Albert E. Guth, former Senior Vice President and Chief 
Financial Officer of Astec Industries, Inc., is President of this 
new subsidiary.

In 1996, we also began operations at Pavement Technology, 
Inc. located in Conyers, Georgia.  Astec Industries, Inc. is a 
50% shareholder of this company, which manufactures an 
asphalt pavement analyzer and a vibratory compactor and 
packages mix-design laboratory products.  These products allow 
our customers to purchase a complete design laboratory from 
one source.  The pavement analyzer technology has captured the 
interest of state departments of transportation and universities as 
a new standard for measuring rutting, fatigue, and water 
susceptibility in hot-mix asphalt.  The pavement technology 
product line adds a completely new dimension to the services 
and equipment we are able to provide our customers.

We never take our shareholders for granted, and we deeply 
appreciate your patience with us over the last two years.  Quite 
candidly, we are not happy with the profits we have earned over 
the past two years, and we have taken a hard look at our 
operations in order to make the changes necessary to maximize 
our profit potential in the future.  We believe we have done that 
and that we are strategically positioned to reap the benefits.  Our 
Company has the largest share of the hot-mix asphalt plant, 
asphalt heater, and large custom trencher markets.  We are 
among the leaders in rock crushers, milling machines, and 
asphalt pavers, and we believe that our technology, much of 
which is patented, is the most innovative and reliable in the 
world today.

Astec Industries, Inc. went public approximately ten years ago 
in June 1986.  While the amount and consistency of our profits 
has not been satisfactory to us, we are proud of the overall 
performance of the Company which we intend to enhance.  For 
example, on September 30, 1986, our net worth was 
$17,803,000.  By December 31, 1996 our net worth had risen to 
$99,393,000.  On a per-share basis, the net worth of the 
Company was $3.04 on September 30, 1986, and had increased 
to $9.84 per share by December 31, 1996, representing a 
compounded growth rate of net worth of approximately 12.1% 
per year.

Our mission in 1997 is the expansion and enhancement of our 
core businesses and improvement of the return on our 
shareholders' investments.  We believe we will fulfill that 
mission and will set a new standard of performance that will 
continue into the future.  We deeply appreciate the trust, 
confidence, and support of our customers, employees, and 
especially our stockholders.

Sincerely,

/s/ J. Don Brock

J. Don Brock, Ph.D., P.E.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(in thousands, except as noted *)
								
                                                              						Percent 
							                                                             Increase
			                                    1996		          1995		       (Decrease)
Operating Results	

Net sales                            		$221,413	       $242,601	    (8.7)%

Patent suit damages and 
     expenses	                         264		           699		        (62.2)%

Loss on abandonment 
of foreign subsidiary			                               7,037

Pre-tax income		                       7,018	         	6,141	      	14.3%

Net income		                           4,345		         4,560		      (4.7)%


Financial Position

Working capital		                      $69,884		       $58,015    		20.5%
Shareholders' equity	                  99,393	        	95,901      	3.6%


Per Common Share

Net income*		                          $0.43		         $0.45		      (4.4)%
Book value per 
     common 	share at 
     year-end*	                        9.84	           9.50		        3.6%


Other Data

Weighted average 
     number of common 
     and common equivalent 
     shares outstanding	               10,047		        10,072	

Common shareholders - 
    	approximate*	                     700	           	750
Employees*		                           1,457         		1,402

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

Astec Industries, Inc. and its operating subsidiaries share a 
commitment of providing  quality equipment for rebuilding 
infrastructure, both domestically and internationally. From rock 
to road, each company provides a critical function in the road 
building process. Using the latest design and manufacturing 
technology, these companies provide the most modern and 
innovative equipment available today.

Hot Mix Asphalt Plants

Astec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a 
complete line of portable, stationary, and relocatable hot mix 
asphalt plants and related components under the "ASTEC" 
trademark. An asphalt mixing plant consists of heating and 
storage equipment  (manufactured by Heatec or CEI) for liquid 
asphalt, cold feed bins for storing aggregates, a drum mixer, a 
baghouse composed of air filters and other pollution control 
devices, hot storage bins or silos for temporary storage of hot 
mix asphalt and a control house. The Company introduced the 
concept of plant portability in 1979. Its current generation of 
portable asphalt plants is marketed as the "Six Pack" and 
consists of six portable components which can be disassembled 
and moved to the construction site to reduce relocation 
expenses. Plant portability represents an industry innovation 
developed and successfully marketed by the Company.

In 1996, Astec, Inc. developed an improved version of the "Six 
Pack" plant, making the new "Six Pack" considerably more 
portable and self-erecting.  This design will eliminate the use of 
cranes for disassembly or re-erection.  The enhanced version of 
the "Six Pack," known as the Turbo 400, is capable of 
producing 400 tons per hour of hot mix asphalt.  This highly 
portable plant is especially useful in less populated areas where 
plants must be moved from job to job.

The components in the company's asphalt mixing plants are 
fully automated and use microprocessor-based control systems 
for efficient operation.  The plants are manufactured to meet or 
exceed federal and state clean air standards.

Many of the existing Astec products are suited for blending, 
vaporizing, drying and incinerating contaminated products. As a 
result, Astec, Inc. has developed a line of thermal purification 
equipment for the remediation of petroleum contaminated soil.

Mobile Construction Equipment

Roadtec designs, engineers, manufactures and markets asphalt 
pavers, material transfer vehicles and milling machines. 
Roadtec engineers emphasize simplicity, productivity, 
versatility and accessibility in product design and use.

Asphalt Pavers. Asphalt pavers are used in the application of 
hot mix asphalt to the road surface. Roadtec pavers have been 
designed to minimize maintenance costs while exceeding  road 
surface smoothness requirements. 

Material Transfer Vehicles.  The "Shuttle Buggy" is a mobile, 
self-propelled material transfer vehicle which allows continuous 
paving by separating truck unloading from the paving process 
while remixing the asphalt surface material. A typical asphalt 
paver must stop paving to permit truck unloading of the asphalt 
mix. By permitting continuous paving, the "Shuttle Buggy"  
allows the asphalt paver to produce a smoother road surface.

Milling Machines. Roadtec milling machines are designed to 
remove old asphalt from the road surface before new hot mix 
asphalt is applied.  They are manufactured with a simplified 
control system, wide conveyors, direct drives and a wide range 
of horsepower and cutting capabilities to provide versatility in 
product application.

Heat Transfer Equipment

Heatec designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a variety 
of heaters and heat transfer processing equipment under the 
"HEATEC" trade name for use in various industries including 
the asphalt industry.  CEI Enterprises ("CEI") designs, 
manufactures and markets heating equipment and storage tanks 
primarily for the asphalt paving industry, and markets 
equipment under the CEI name. 

Asphalt Heating Equipment.  Heatec manufactures direct-fired 
and helical coil heaters for the asphalt industry, while CEI's 
heating equipment is hot oil, direct fired or electric.  CEI and 
Heatec make a wide range of models that are both portable and 
stationary in capacities up to 35,000 gallons.  Heatec and CEI 
both manufacture rubber blending and mixing systems.

Industrial Heating Equipment. Heatec also builds a wide variety 
of industrial heaters to fit a broad range of applications, 
including equipment for emulsion plants, roofing material 
plants, refineries, chemical processing, rubber plants and the 
agribusiness. Heatec has the technical staff to custom design 
heating systems and has systems operating as large as 
40,000,000 BTUs per hour.

Aggregates Processing Equipment

Founded in 1906, Telsmith, Inc. designs, manufactures, and 
markets a complete line of aggregate and mineral processing 
equipment and related machinery under the "TELSMITH" 
trademark for the mining, quarrying, and sand and gravel 
industries worldwide.  Telsmith's products include jaw, cone, 
and impact crushers; several types of feeders which move 
virgin, recycled, or crushed material to primary, secondary, or 
tertiary crushing equipment; vibrating screens to separate the 
aggregate into various sizes; and washing and conveying 
equipment.  In metallic mining operations, Telsmith equipment 
is used in primary crushing stages after the material has been 
blasted from the deposit.  Secondary and tertiary crushing 
equipment, as well as vibrating equipment, are employed in 
Telsmith systems to reduce the material down to sizes for 
grinding mill feed or leech bed processes. 

Equipment furnished by Telsmith can be purchased as 
individual components, as portable plants for flexibility, or as 
completely engineered systems for both portable and stationary 
applications.

In 1994, Telsmith received ISO 9001 certification, the 
international standard of quality assurance in the design, 
development, production, installation, and servicing of our 
products.  This designation is a recognition of the quality of our 
products and services in the worldwide marketplace.

Production Engineered Products, Inc. ("PEP") designs, 
manufactures, and markets high-frequency vibrating screens for 
sand and gravel and asphalt operations.  In addition, PEP 
incorporates the high-frequency screens into portable crushing 
and screening plants serving the aggregate and industrial 
markets.  

Trenching and Excavating Equipment

Trencor designs, manufactures and markets chain and wheel 
trenching equipment, canal excavators, rock saws, roadminers 
and log handling equipment. 
Chain Trenchers. Trencor chain trenching machines utilize a 
heavy duty chain (equipped with cutting teeth attached to steel 
plates) wrapped around a long movable boom. These machines, 
with weights up to 400,000 pounds, are capable of cutting a 
trench up to eight feet wide and thirty feet deep. Trencor also 
makes foundation trenchers used in areas where drilling and 
blasting are prohibited.

Wheel Trenchers. Trencor wheel trenching machines are used in 
pipeline excavation in soil and soft rock. The wheel trenchers 
weigh up to 390,000 pounds and have a trench capacity of up to 
seven feet in width and ten feet in depth.

Canal Excavators. Trencor canal excavators are used to make 
finished and trimmed trapezoidal canal excavations within close 
tolerances. The canals are primarily used for irrigation systems.

Material Processors.  During 1996, Trencor developed a 
machine which includes a crusher that operates independent of 
the trencher to process rock and related material (spoil) removed 
from the trench to make it suitable for use as a filler around 
pipes, cables or other lines being installed.  Patents are pending 
on this product.

Rock Saws. Trencor manufactures a rock saw which is utilized 
for laying water and gas lines, fiber optics cable, constructing 
highway drainage systems and for other applications.

Roadminers. The "Roadminer" is a 400,000 pound unit 
manufactured by Trencor with an attachment which allows it to 
cut a path up to twelve and a half feet wide and five feet deep on 
a single pass. The Roadminer has applications in the road 
construction industry and in mining and aggregates processing 
operations.

Log Loaders. Trencor also manufactures several different 
models of log loaders. Its products include mobile/truck 
mounted models, as well as track mounted and stationary 
models, each of which is used in harvesting and processing 
wood products. The equipment is sold under the Log Hog name.

Asphalt, Mix Design, and Quality Control Testing Equipment

In 1996, Pavement Technology, Inc. was formed and is located 
in Conyers, Georgia.  Astec Industries, Inc. is a 50% 
shareholder of this company, which manufactures an asphalt 
pavement analyzer, vibratory compactor and packages mix-
design laboratory products, that allow our customers to 
purchase a complete design laboratory from one source.  The 
pavement analyzer technology has captured the interest of state 
departments of transportation and universities as a new standard 
for measuring rutting, fatigue, and water susceptibility in hot-
mix asphalt.  The pavement technology product line adds a 
completely new dimension to the services and equipment we are 
able to provide our customers.

Captive Finance Business

Astec Financial Services, Inc. was formed in June 1996 as a 
wholly-owned subsidiary of Astec Industries, Inc. to provide a 
wide range of financing products for the Company's equipment.  
AFS, a captive finance company, is dedicated to working 
exclusively with all of the Company's  subsidiaries and their 
customers in arranging financing for the Company's equipment.  
AFS has provided loans, operating leases, floor plans for 
dealers, fleet rental plans and has developed financing plans to 
meet the needs of the industry.Accounts................  A-24


      SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

                           (in thousands, except as noted *)
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 Consolidated Income Statement Data Net sales $221,413$265,365 $ 221,413 $242,601 $213,806 $172,801 $149,133 Selling, general and administrative expenses 36,125 35,082 34,326 31,142 28,624 23,969 Research and development 3,707 5,868 5,128 3,166 2,923 2,580 Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments) 264 699 (14,947) 375 567 Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary 7,037 Income from operations 24,661 8,051 2,566 27,236 9,974 7,058 Interest expense 2,398 1,656 2,125 713 1,788 3,241 Net income 13,809 4,345 4,560 23,436 9,338 6,014 IncomeEarnings per common share*(1)(2) Basic 1.45 .43 .45 2.38 1.07 .82Diluted 1.42 .43 .45 2.35 1.06 Consolidated Balance Sheet Data Working capital $ 69,884 $ 58,015$71,459 $69,884 $58,015 $ 53,000 $40,767 $33,641$ 40,767 Total assets 192,243 167,853 154,356 155,964 102,967 87,885 Total short-term debt 500 2,051 774 8,573 10 3,103 Long-term debt, less current maturities 35,230 30,497 17,150 16,155 22,660 Shareholders' equity 105,612 99,393 95,901 90,373 64,105 27,631 Book value per common share at year-end*(1) 11.25 9.84 9.50 9.04 6.54 3.78
Quarterly Financial Highlights (Unaudited) First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter 1997 Net sales $62,980 $73,159 $65,040 $64,186 Gross profit 15,875 17,765 14,633 16,220 Net income 3,525 4,625 2,821 2,838 Earnings per common share*(2) Basic .35 .48 .30 .30 Diluted .35 .48 .30 .30 1996 Net sales $ 59,570 $ 63,212 $ 47,182 $ 51,449$59,570 $63,212 $47,182 $51,449 Gross profit 13,822 15,305 11,284 8,854 Net income 2,826 2,245 1,021 (1,747) Net income(l,747) Earnings per common share*(2) Basic .28 .22 .10 (.17) 1995 Net sales $ 57,544 $ 70,368 $ 65,015 $ 49,674 Gross profit 13,637 14,011 13,298 8,811 Net income 2,516 4,730 2,768 (5,454) Net income per common share* .25 .47 .27 (.54)Diluted .28 .22 .10 (.17) Common Stock Price* 1997 High 10-1/8 12-7/8 17-3/4 18-3/8 1997 Low 8-1/4 9-5/8 12-5/16 15-3/8 1996 High 10-5/8 11-1/8 9-1/8 9-3/4 1996 Low 9-1/8 8-1/4 8-1/8 8-3/8 1995 High 14-1/4 13-1/8 11-3/4 12-1/4 1995 Low 11 10-7/8 9-7/8 9-3/4 The Company's common stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ) National Market under the symbol ASTE. Prices shown are the high and low bid prices as announced by NASDAQ. The Company has never paid any dividends on its common stock. The number of shareholders of record is approximately 700.600. (1) Restated to retroactively reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a dividend on August 12, 1993. (2) All earnings per share amounts have been restated to comply with Statement of Financial Standards No. 128, Earnings per Share. (3) Positive physical inventory adjustments, offset by certain other fourth quarter charges, increased earnings per share in the fourth quarter of 1997 by approximately $.04 per share. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Results of Operations 1997 vs. 1996 Net income for 1997 was $13,809,000, or $1.45 per share basic or $l.42 per share diluted, compared to net income of $4,345,000, or $.43 per share both basic and diluted in 1996. The effect of the Company's purchase of its common shares in the second quarter was to increase basic net income per share by $.08 and diluted net income per share by $.07. The 1996 results included approximately $3,000,000 of charges related to the discontinuance and writedown of a newly-developed mining machine product line, increases in inventory reserves related to the log loader business and litigation expenses. In 1996 the Company experienced a decline in international sales of asphalt plants of $25,447,000; however, the Company improved international asphalt plant sales in 1997 by $11,690,000. Net sales for 1997 were $265,365,000, an increase of $43,952,000, or approximately 19.9% compared to 1996. The 1997 international sales increased by $20,593,000 (53.8%) to approximately $58,902,000 compared to 1996 international sales of $38,309,000. The 1997 international sales represented a return to within $63,000 of the 1995 international sales volume. The 1997 domestic sales increased from $183,104,000 to $206,463,000, or $23,359,000, for a 12.8% increase from 1996. The increase in domestic sales is principally attributed to increased sales in asphalt plants and mobile equipment. The increase in international sales was attributed to all subsidiaries increasing their sales, with asphalt plants, mobile equipment and rock crushing equipment being the leaders. International sales by domestic subsidiaries in 1997 were 22.2% of total sales compared to 17.3% in 1996. The gross profit margin was 24.3% in 1997 compared to 22.3% in 1996. The improvement was generated primarily from increased volumes in the asphalt plant and mobile equipment operations and efficiences being realized from capital expenditures made over the last few years. In 1997, selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased to 13.6% of net sales from 15.8% of net sales in 1996. The volume increase in net sales, coupled with significant reductions in legal expenses from 1996, are the primary factors responsible for the decreased percentage. Research and development expenses decreased to 1.4% of net sales in 1997 from 2.7% in the prior year. Research and development expenses decreased from 1996 to 1997 primarily because of the product development expenses related to the mining machine in 1996, which were approximately $2,300,000. The reduction in expenses, coupled with the increase in sales volume, impacted the percentage of research and development expenses to net sales. Interest expense for 1997 increased to .9% of sales from .8% of sales for 1996. The increase related primarily to borrowings required for the captive finance company, which completed its first full year of operations in 1997 and funds needed for the purchase of shares under the Company's dutch tender offer completed in May 1997. Income tax expense for 1997 was $9,156,977, or 39.9% of pre-tax income, compared to $2,673,000 for 1996, or 38.1% of pre-tax income. The backlog at December 31, 1997 was $61,387,000 (including $8,022,000 for Kolberg-Pioneer) compared to $54,298,000. This represents a 13.1% increase over 1996. The backlog without Kolberg-Pioneer at December 31, 1996 was $44,911,000. The increase is principally attributed to increased asphalt plant orders. The Company is unable to determine whether this increase in backlog was experienced by the industry as a whole or whether it reflects an increase of market share. While this backlog reflects a positive development, management does not believe this increase represents a trend, but is attributed to periodic fluctuations in sales volume given the nature of the Company's products and customers. Results of Operations 1996 vs. 1995 Net income for 1996 was $4,345,000, or $.43 per share, compared to net income of $4,560,000, or $.45 per share, in 1995. Net income for 1995 included losses of approximately $4,279,000 relative to the Company's former German subsidiaries, Astec-EuropaAstec- Europa and Wibau-Astec, while pre-tax income for 1996 was reduced by approximately $3,000,000 due to various fourth quarter charges. Net income from domestic operations was $4,345,000 in 1996 compared to $8,840,000 in 1995. This decrease was principally attributed to the fourth quarter charges taken in connection with the discontinuance and writedown of a newly-developed mining machine product line, increases in inventory reserves related to the Company's log loader business and additional litigation expenses incurred by the Company. The Company also experienced a $25,447,000 decline in international asphalt plant sales from domestic operations from 1995 to 1996. This decline had a significant adverse impact on net income for 1996. In addition, the Company experienced an increase in income tax expense of approximately $870,000 in 1996 due to an increase in the effective income tax rate applicable to the Company. This also contributed to the decrease in net income from domestic operations for 1996. Net sales for 1996 were $221,413,000, a decrease of $21,188,000, or approximately 8.7% compared to 1995. Excluding sales of $24,748,000 related to German operations which were disposed of in 1995, 1996 sales increased by $3,560,000, or 1.6%, and domestic sales increased by $24,216,000 in 1996 compared to 1995. This increase in domestic sales is principally attributed to strong sales in mobile equipment, rock crushing equipment, a slight improvement in sales of trencher equipment and increased domestic sales of asphalt plants. However, this increase in domestic sales was offset by a $20,656,000 decrease in international sales, primarily as a result of a $25,447,000 decline in international sales of asphalt plants. International sales by domestic subsidiaries were 17.3% of total sales in 1996 compared to 24.3% of total sales in 1995. The gross profit margin for 1996 was 22.3% compared to 20.5% for 1995. This increase reflects the improvement attributable to the disposition of German operations in 1995 where gross profit margin was low. Domestic operations' gross profit margin for 1996 was 22.3% compared to 22.5% for 1995. In 1996, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased to 15.8% of net sales from 14.1% in 1995. In 1995, selling, general, and administrative expenses were 14.0%, excluding the German operations. ConExpo, an equipment show which occurs once every three years, accounted for .4% of the increase. As a percentage, the additional increase is attributed to the reduction in net sales for 1996, increased sales accommodations on the log loader product line, increased selling expenses primarily related to salaries, travel, and entertainment expenses at all subsidiaries, and product demonstration expenses at the Roadtec subsidiary. Research and development expenses increased from 2.1% of net sales in 1995 to 2.6% in 1996. Excluding the German operations, research and development expenses were 1.3% in 1995. This increase in 1996 was principally attributed to the product development expenses related to a prototype mining machine which will be discontinued in 1997.machine. Interest expense for 1996 decreased to .8% of-of sales from .9% of sales in 1995. The decrease resulted from reduced average borrowings and lower average interest rates during 1996. Other income decreased by $5,076,000 from 1995 to 1996. Excluding German operations, the decrease was only $525,000. The 1995 other income, excluding Germany, included gains on the sale of fixed assets, primarily related to the sale of the former manufacturing facility operated by Telsmith, Inc., but no such comparable gains occurred in 1996. Income tax expense for 1996 was $2,673,000, or approximately 38.1% of pre-tax income, compared to $1,580,000, or approximately 25.7%, of pre-tax income in 1995. The variance from the normal corporate tax rate in 1995 was primarily attributed to a lower effective tax rate related to the Company's foreign operations. The Company has previously utilized the majority of its tax credit carryforwards, therefore,the Company's tax rate for 1996 and subsequent years will approximate the normal corporate rate. The backlog at December 31, 1996 was $44,911,000 compared to $34,751,000 at December 31, 1995, representing a 29.2% increase which was principally attributed to increased domestic asphalt plant orders. The Company is unable to determine whether this increase in backlog was experienced by the industry as a whole or whether it reflects an increase of market share. While this backlog reflects a positive development, management does not believe this increase represents a trend, but is attributed to periodic fluctuations in sales volume given the nature of the Company'stheCompany's products and customers. In contrast to the strong domestic market, international asphalt plant orders continue to be slow and unpredictable. In an effort to improve international asphalt plant sales, the Company is reviewinghas reviewed its international sales efforts and developinghas located a plan to add agentssalesman in Singapore Malaysia, and Indonesia, as well as increase its participation in international trade shows in 1997.to develop that regional market. The Company will also holdheld a service school for Spanish- speakingSpanish-speaking customers in 1997. Results of Operations 1995 vs. 1994 Net income for 1995 was $4,560,000 or $.45 per share compared to net income of $23,436,000 or $2.38 per share in 1994. Net income for 1994 included $14,947,000 in non- recurring gains as a result of final judgments entered in connection with the CMI litigation. The decline in 1995 also reflects a $7,037,000 loss resulting from the abandonment of Astec-Europa, as well as continuing losses from foreign operations during 1995. Income before income taxes was $6,141,000 in 1995 compared to $25,737,000 in 1994. This is shown in the following table: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 Income before income taxes $ 6,141,000 $ 25,737,000 Patent suit recoveries - CMI litigation (14,947,000) Gain on sale of Wibau-Astec (2,449,000) Loss on abandonment of Astec-Europa 7,037,000 Loss from foreign subsidiaries 3,598,000 5,366,000 Adjusted pre-tax income from domestic operations 14,327,000 16,156,000 Income taxes for domestic operations (5,487,000) (916,000) Net income from domestic operations $ 8,840,000 $ 15,240,000 The decrease in adjusted pre-tax income for domestic operations of $1,829,000 in 1995 as compared to 1994 was the result of increased gross profit margin due to increased sales of domestic subsidiaries which were more than offset by increased interest and research and development expenses, and a decrease in other income from domestic subsidiaries. Net sales for 1995 were $242,601,000, an increase of $28,795,000 or approximately 13.5% compared to 1994. Of this increase, $14,615,000 is attributable to the acquisition of Gibat Ohl and the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Wibau-Astec. CEI, which was acquired in 1995, accounted for $3,543,000 in sales. Excluding the increase from the German operations and the CEI acquisition, sales increased $10,637,000 or 5.2%. International sales by domestic subsidiaries were 24.3% of total sales in both 1995 and 1994. The net increase in sales reflected a strong sales increase in asphalt plants, heaters and rock crushing equipment, but reduced sales in mobile equipment and trenchers. The gross profit margin for 1995 was 20.5% compared to 22.5% for 1994. This decrease was primarily due to lower gross profit margins from our foreign operations which had gross profit margins of 3.4% in 1995 compared to 11.4% in 1994. Domestic operations gross profit margin for 1995 was 22.5% compared to 23.0% for 1994. In 1995, selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased to 14.1% of net sales from 14.6% in 1994. The Gencor patent litigation accounted for $699,000 of legal fees which were included in 1995 patent damages and expenses. Research and development expenses increased from 1.5% of net sales in 1994 to 2.1% in 1995, primarily due to foreign operations. As noted above, income from operations was significantly impacted by the losses of Astec-Europa in 1995. The total pre- tax loss, including the cost of abandonment, was approximately $9,945,000. Astec-Europa incurred pre-tax operating losses in 1995 of approximately $2,908,000. Due to Astec-Europa's poor operating results and its negative net worth at December 31, 1995, the Company declined to contribute additional capital to Astec-Europa, and elected instead to abandon the subsidiary in accordance with German law. Astec-Europa management filed a request for bankruptcy in Germany on February 9, 1996. Consequently, the Company was not required to fund Astec- Europa's liabilities except for certain liabilities previously guaranteed by the Company. The loss on abandonment of approximately $7,037,000 included the liabilities of Astec- Europa that were guaranteed by the Company and the remainder of the original investment recorded on the books of the Company. Interest expense for 1995 increased to .9% of net sales from .3% in 1994. The increase resulted from increased inventories in anticipation of sales which did not materialize and investment in capital expenditures of $15,160,000. Other income increased by approximately $722,000 or 36.7% in 1995, resulting primarily from Astec-Europa (formerly Gibat Ohl) receiving $1,430,000 to settle various claims related to Astec-Europa's business operations. The gain on sale of foreign subsidiary of $2,449,000 in 1995 was due to the sale of Wibau- Astec as described in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements. Income tax expense for 1995 was $1,580,000, or approximately 25.7% of pre-tax income compared to $2,300,000, or approximately 8.9% of pre-tax income in 1994. The reason for the variance from the normal corporate tax rate in 1994 was the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and establishment of a deferred tax benefit relative to net deductible temporary differences which could be recovered against future taxes or taxes previously paid. The variance in 1995 was primarily attributed to foreign operations. See Note 9 to Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to the utilization of the majority of its credit carryforwards, the Company's tax rate for 1996 and subsequent years will approximate the normal corporate rate. The backlog at December 31, 1995 was $34,751,000 compared to $50,465,000 at December 31, 1994 which represented a 31.1% decrease. The Company's backlog for 1994 was unusually large primarily due to the optimism of many of our major customers about the strength of the economy and increased demand resulting from the renewed emphasis to rebuild infrastructure. Liquidity and Capital Resources Working capital increased to $71,459,000 at December 31, 1997 from $69,884,000 at December 31, 1996 from $58,015,0001996. The Company's debt- to-equity ratio was .34 to 1.00 at December 31, 1995. The Company's debt-to-equity ratio was1997 and .33 to 1.00 at December 31, 1996 and .19 to 1.00 at December 31, 1995.1996. The Company's principal source of liquidity in 19961997 was its borrowings under current and newly-obtained credit facilities. Total short-term borrowings, including current maturities of long-term debt, were $500,000 at December 31, 1997 and $2,051,000 at December 31, 1996 and $774,000 at December 31, 1995.1996. Included in short-term borrowings at December 31, 1996 was a loan from the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Dr. J. Don Brock, dated March 18, 1996, in the amount of $1,078,000. The principal and all accrued interest on the loan, calculated at the Company's current borrowing rate under its revolving credit facility with First Chicago NBD, was repaid to Dr. Brock on January 6, 1997. Long-term debt, less current maturities, was $35,230,000 at December 31, 1997 and $30,497,000 at December 31, 19961996. Major items impacting the borrowing include business combinations of $22,383,000, the purchase of shares in the 1997 dutch tender for $7,782,000 and $17,150,000 at December 31, 1995. The majority of the increase in long-term debt related to increased usage of the Company's revolving line of credit. Contributing to the significant increase was payment of $3,049,000 for liabilities guaranteed by the Company related to the 1995 abandonment of Astec-Europa operations, capital expenditures of $8,708,000, and an increase in finance receivables of $5,226,000 related to the operations of Astec Financial Services, Inc., which began in June 1996.$9,044,000, offset by funds generated from operations. Capital expenditures of $8,708,000$9,044,000, excluding those for equipment leased to others, were made in 1996 as1997 compared to capital expenditures in 19951996 of $15,160,000.$8,708,000. The Company has an unsecured revolving credit loan agreement with First Chicago NBD. The line of credit is $22,000,000.$70,000,000. This credit facility expires June 30, 1999.November 22, 2002. At December 31, 1996, $13,322,0001997, $23,230,000 of the line of credit was utilized. Principal covenants under the First Chicago credit agreement include (i) the maintenance of certain levels of net worth and compliance with certain current,net worth, leverage and interest expense, and fixed chargecoverage ratios, (ii) a limitation on capital expenditures and rental expense, (iii) a prohibition against dividends, and (iv) a prohibition on large acquisitions except upon the consent of the lenders. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants related to the above loan agreement at December 31, 1996. In addition to1997. As part of the Company's $22,000,000$70,000,000 revolving credit facility, Astec Financial Services, Inc. establishedhas a $15,000,000segregated portion of up to a $30,000,000 line of credit with The CIT Group/Equipment Financing.credit. At December 31, 1996,1997, Astec Financial Services Inc. had utilized $2,508,000$680,000 of this line. Advances under this line are limited to "Eligible Receivables" of Astec Financial Services Inc. as defined in the credit agreement. Principal covenants under the CIT Group credit agreement are substantially the same as those of the First Chicago credit facility with the exception of a minimum net worth requirement for Astec Financial Services, Inc. The Company and Astec Financial Services Inc. were in compliance with all financial covenants related to the CIT line of credit at December 31, 1996.1997. In 1996,1997, year-end trade receivables rose to $33,946,000 from $30,040,000 from $27,075,000at 31, 1996. This increase of $3,906,000 reflects the business combination which accounted for $4,913,000 of receivables at December 31, 1995 with slower receivable turnaround being the primary reason for the increase.1997. Inventory levels increased $881,000 during 1996 with$12,631,000 to $69,395,000 at December 31, 1997 from $56,764,000 at December 31, 1996. The increase in inventory primarily reflects the business combination which accounted for $12,198,000 of the increase in ending inventory of asphalt plants and aggregate processing products offset by decreased ending inventory of asphalt paving equipment.at December 31, 1997. For additional information on current and long-term debt, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Contingencies See Note 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on certain pending litigation and contingent liabilities arising from recourse financing arrangements. Environmental Matters Based on information available, from environmental consultants,management believes the Company has no material reserve requirements for potential environmental liabilities. Forward Looking StatmentsGeneral The Company recognizes the need to ensure its operations will not be adversely impacted by Year 2000 software failures. The term "Year 2000" is a general term used to describe the various problems that may result from the improper processing of dates and date-sensitive calculations by computers and other machinery as the year 2000 is approached and reached. These problems generally arise from the fact that most of the world's computer hardware and software have historically used only two digits to identify the year in a date, often meaning that the computer will fail to distinguish dates in the "2000s" from dates in the "1900s." Software failures due to processing errors potentially arising from calculations using the Year 2000 date are a known risk. During the first quarter of 1998,the Company commenced a Year 2000 project to address all necessary code changes, testing and implementation. The Company is utilizing both internal and external resources to identify, correct or reprogram, and test its systems for Year 2000 compliance. Although the total cost of compliance and its effect on the Company's future results of operations is impossible to project at this time, the Company is attempting to determine the total costs and effect on results of operations as part of the project. Total costs associated with the Year 2000 issue have been immaterial to date but may be material in the future. The ultimate cost is subject to a number of uncertainties beyond the Company's control, including the availability of consultants and sufficient personnel to deal with the issue and the ability to locate and correct all relevant computer codes. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The Company may, from time to time, make forward-looking statements, including statements contained in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and its reports to shareholders. Statements made in this annual report on Form 10-K, other than those concerning historical information, should be considered forward-looking and subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such foward-lookingforward-looking statements are made based on management's belief as of the date thereof, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to management, pursuant to "safe habor"harbor_ provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the effects of future economic conditions; the amount of federal, state and local governmental revenues to support road building and related activities,activities; and the effects of competition in the design, engineering and manufacturing of equipment and components used in road building and various other consturctionconstruction activities. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by, or on behalf of, the Company. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Note 1 $2,926,294 $ 3,382,484 $ 3,133,070 Trade receivables less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,342,000 in 1997 and $1,267,000 in 1996 and $1,279,000 in 199533,945,574 30,039,813 27,075,401 Finance receivables Note15Note1 44,074,230 3,371,513 Notes and other receivables 751,235 1,191,223 596,134 Inventories Note 1, 4 69,395,351 56,764,085 55,882,679 Prepaid expenses 1,985,197 1,967,999 894,593 Refundable income taxes 2,071,063 2,341,849 Deferred tax asset Note 9 5,536,666 5,534,950 6,667,052 Other current assets 7,550 4,169 5,214 Total current assets 118,622,097 104,327,299 96,595,992 Property and equipment, net Note 5 61,605,153 54,317,352 51,709,033 Other assets: Goodwill 8,226,831 5,285,051 4,066,152 Finance receivables Note 1514 670,801 1,854,443 Notes receivable 1,261,985 320,000 572,829 Deferred tax asset Note 9 711,987 442,458 Other 1,144,245 1,306,113 1,412,326 Total other assets 12,015,849 9,208,065 6,051,307 Total $ 167,852,716 $ 154,356,332$192,243,099 $167,852,716 Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Current liabilities: Current maturities of long-term debt Note 7 $ 2,051,003500,000 $ 774,2742,051,003 Accounts payable 21,421,882 14,613,782 15,877,964 Customer deposits 6,464,842 2,150,852 4,989,557 Accrued product warranty 3,206,372 2,364,705 2,470,775Accrued payroll and related liabilities 6,049,429 3,503,080 Income taxes payable 809,384 Deferred tax liability Note 9 275,687 173,388 Accrued insurance 2,242,447 2,672,274 2,783,246 Amounts payable in business combination Note 2 2,405,145 Liabilities related to abandoned subsidiary Note 3 360,760 593,886 3,643,077 Other accrued liabilities 7,418,242 8,041,7195,832,716 3,915,162 Total current liabilities 47,163,519 34,443,277 38,580,612 Long-term debt, less current maturities Note 7 35,230,000 30,496,734 17,150,000 Deferred tax liability Note 9 3,216,948 2,838,024 2,351,283 Deferred retirement costs Note 8 320,314 544,911 373,310 Other 700,155 136,842 Total liabilities 86,630,936 68,459,788 58,455,205 Shareholders' equity: Note 1,11 Preferred stock - authorized 2,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value; none issued Common stock - authorized 20,000,000 shares of $.20 par value; issued and outstanding - 10,111,199 in 1997 and 10,101,199 in 1996 and 10,092,199 in 19952,022,240 2,020,240 2,018,440 Additional paid-in-capitalpaid-in capital 52,043,830 51,980,855 51,940,580 Retained earnings 60,096,397 46,286,983 41,942,107 Minimum pension liability adjustment (127,150) 114,162,467 100,160,928 95,901,127 Less common stock in treasury at cost - 790,619 shares in 1997 and 64,000 shares in 1996 (8,550,304) (768,000) Total shareholders' equity 105,612,163 99,392,928 95,901,127 Total $ 167,852,716 $ 154,356,332$192,243,099 $167,852,716 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 Net sales $ 221,412,796 $ 242,601,351 $ 213,806,411$265,365,312 $221,412,796 $242,601,351 Cost of sales 200,872,181 172,147,913 192,844,160 165,709,245 Gross profit 64,493,131 49,264,883 49,757,191 48,097,166 Selling, general and administrativeadministative expenses 36,124,728 35,081,800 34,325,974 31,142,335 Research and development expenses 3,706,909 5,867,909 5,128,495 3,165,795 Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments) Note 10 263,978 699,222 (14,947,498) Restructuring costs Note 12 1,500,469 Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary Note 3 7,037,105 Income from operations 24,661,494 8,051,196 2,566,395 27,236,065 Other income (expense): Interest expense (2,397,902) (1,656,466) (2,125,261) (712,853) Interest income 259,388 386,646 565,724 426,489 Other income - net 347,253 247,434 2,685,161 1,963,633 Gain on sale of foreign subsidiary Note 2 2,448,551 Equity in lossincome (loss) of joint venture Note 21 96,158 (10,652) (3,176,834) Income before income taxes 22,966,391 7,018,158 6,140,570 25,736,500 Income taxes Note 9 9,156,977 2,673,282 1,580,210 2,300,126 Net income $ 13,809,414 $ 4,344,876 $ 4,560,360 $ 23,436,374$4,560,360 Earnings per Common and Common Equivalent Share:Share Net incomeincome: Basic $ 1.45 $ .43 $ .45 $ 2.38Diluted 1.42 .43 .45 Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding Note 11: Basic 9,555,940 10,047,442 10,071,930 9,843,98010,071,931 Diluted 9,726,096 10,158,658 10,195,917 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY For the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994
Foreign Common Stock Additional Currency Pension Common Note 1Common Stock Paid-in Translation Retained Liability Stock in Shares Note 1 Amount Capital Adjustment Earnings Adjustment in Treasury Balance
December 31, 1993 9,795,402 $1,959,080 $48,200,446 $13,945,373 Issuance of common stock 206,429 41,286 2,700,462 Change during year $ 89,975 Net income 23,436,374 Balance December 31, 1994 10,001,831 2,000,366 50,900,908 89,975 37,381,747$2,000,366 $50,900,908 $89,975 $37,381,747 Issuance of common stock 90,368 18,074 1,039,672 Change during year (89,975) Net income 4,560,360 Balance December 31, 1995 10,092,199 2,018,440 51,940,580 41,942,107 Issuance of common stock 9,000 1,800 40,275 Common stock acquired for treasury - 64,000 shares $(768,000)$ (768,000) Minimum pension liability adjustment $(127,150) Net income 4,344,876 Balance December 31, 1996 10,101,199 $2,020,240 $51,980,855 $0 $46,286,983 $(127,150) $(768,000)2,020,240 51,980,855 46,286,983 (127,150) (768,000) Issuance of common stock 10,000 2,000 62,975 Common stock acquired for treasury - 726,619 shares (7,782,304) Minimum pension liability adjustment 127,150 Net income 13,809,414 Balance December 31, 1997 10,111,199 $2,022,240 $52,043,830 $ 0 $60,096,397 $ 0 $(8,550,304)
[FN] See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994 Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income $ 4,344,876 $ 4,560,360 $ 23,436,374 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 5,812,723 5,697,862 3,941,871 Provision for doubtful accounts 157,183 533,136 362,089 Provision for inventory reserves 1,231,828 1,196,876 3,621,218 Provision for warranty 3,018,990 3,194,240 2,616,565 Provision for patent damages (net recoveries and accrual adjustments) (13,250,048) Foreign currency translation adjustment (74,519) 89,975 (Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets 59,118 (263,195) 322,587 (Gain) on sale of finance receivables (67,492) Equity in loss of joint venture 10,652 3,176,834 Gain on sale of foreign subsidiary (2,448,551) Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary 7,037,105 (Increase) decrease in: Receivables (3,855,177) (2,551,526) (7,660,990) Inventories (1,353,245) (5,921,052) (3,537,955) Prepaid expenses (991,145) (2,071,266) (803,177) Patent damage escrow funds 12,309,420 Deferred tax asset 1,349,773 413,524 (4,156,695) Other assets 196,607 (993,322) (1,916,921) Increase (decrease) in: Accounts payable (1,383,256) 6,062,733 2,138,449 Customer deposits (2,838,705) (1,211,925) (1,738,643) Accrued product warranty (3,127,860) (3,433,374) (2,256,128) Income taxes payable 270,786 (1,117,518) 400,355 Other accrued liabilities (3,723,984) (2,373,657) (947,201) Total adjustments (5,233,204) 1,675,571 (7,288,395) Net cash (used) provided by operating activities (888,328) 6,235,931 16,147,979 Cash Flows From Investing Activities Proceeds from sale of property and equipment - net 1,202,335 953,766 307,099 Expenditures for property and equipment (8,707,987) (15,159,921) (21,886,011) Additions to finance receivables (8,333,293) Collections of finance receivables 536,089 Proceeds from sale of finance receivables 2,638,739 Cash received in connection with sale of subsidiary (36,687) Cash balance abandoned with subsidiary (203,643) Additions to notes receivable (60,000) Repayments on notes receivable 901,233 95,256 600,499 Investment in joint venture (100,000) (635,700) Cash payments in connection with business combination, net of cash acquired 164,794 (834,591) 1,447,965 Net cash (used by) investing activities (11,758,090) (15,185,820) (20,166,148) Cash Flows From Financing Activities Proceeds from industrial bonds $ 14,000,000 Purchase of treasury shares $ (768,000) Proceeds from issuance of common stock 42,075 $ 9,750 34,750 Net borrowings under revolving credit loan 11,680,000 1,495,000 2,655,000 Principal repayments of industrial bonds, loans and notes payable (1,027,023) (1,523,213) (5,658,355) Proceeds from debt and notes payable 2,968,780 1,629,978 Net cash provided by financing activities 12,895,832 1,611,515 11,031,395 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 249,414 (7,338,374) 7,013,226 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 3,133,070 10,471,444 3,458,218 Cash and cash equivalents end of period $ 3,382,484 $ 3,133,070 $ 10,471,444 Supplemental Cash Flow Information Cash paid during the year for: Interest $ 1,572,642 $ 1,800,598 $ 595,767 Income taxes $ 3,466,100 $ 5,088,465 $ 282,709 Excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were the following effects of non-cash investing and financing activities: Non-cash business combination: Investment in subsidiary $ 2,405,145 Accrued liability (2,405,145) Non-cash transfer of assets: Trade receivables $ 1,200,000 Notes receivables (1,200 000) Capital stock issued for purchase of subsidiary: Investment in subsidiary $ 1,047,996 $ 2,706,996 Capital stock (17,467) (39,871) Additional paid-in-capitalCash Flows From Operating Activities Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Net income $ 13,809,414 $ 4,344,876 $4,560,360 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 6,944,918 5,812,723 5,697,862 Provision for doubtful accounts 272,578 157,183 533,136 Provision for inventory reserves 418,906 1,231,828 1,196,876 Provision for warranty 2,811,009 3,018,990 3,194,240 Foreign currency translation adjustment (74,519) (Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets 747,112 59,118 (263,195) (Gain) on sale of finance receivables (663,516) (67,492) Equity in (income) loss of joint venture (96,158) 10,652 Gain on sale of foreign subsidiary (2,448,551) Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary 7,037,105 (Increase) decrease in: Receivables 1,005,946 (3,855,177) (2,551,526) Inventories (1,833,029) (1,353,245) (5,921,052) Prepaid expenses (2,010) (991,145) (2,071,266) Deferred tax asset 209,978 1,349,773 413,524 Other assets 261,094 196,607 (993,322) Increase (decrease) in: Accounts payable 3,867,396 (1,383,256) 6,062,733 Customer deposits 4,285,052 (2,838,705) (1,211,925) Accrued product warranty (2,143,242) (3,127,860) (3,433,374) Income taxes payable 2,880,447 270,786 (1,117,518) Other accrued liabilities 1,885,445 (3,723,984) (2,373,657) Total adjustments 20,851,926 (5,233,204) 1,675,571 Net cash (used) provided by operating activities 34,661,340 (888,328) 6,235,931 Cash Flows from Investing Activities Proceeds from sale of property and equipment - net 459,024 1,202,335 953,766 Expenditures for property and equipment, including those for equipment leased to others (25,339,464) (8,707,987) (15,159,921) Additions to finance receivables (13,480,827) (8,333,293) Collections of finance receivables 1,349,934 536,089 Proceeds from sale of finance receivables 28,170,400 2,638,739 Cash received in connection with sale of subsidiary (36,687) Cash balance abandoned w/subsidiary (203,643) Additions to notes receivable (116,536) (60,000) Repayments on notes receivable 758,076 901,233 95,256 Investment in joint venture (100,000) Cash payments in connection with business combination, net of cash acquired (22,383,071) 164,794 (834,591) Net cash (used) by investing activities (30,582,464) (11,758,090) (15,185,820) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Cash Flows From Financing Activities Purchase of treasury shares $(7,782,304) $ (768,000) Proceeds from issuance of common stock 64,975 42,075 $ 9,750 Net borrowings under revolving credit loan 9,908,000 11,680,000 1,495,000 Principal repayments of industrial bonds, loans and notes payable (6,725,737) (1,027,023) (1,523,213) Proceeds from debt and notes payable 2,968,780 1,629,978 Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (4,535,066) 12,895,832 1,611,515 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (456,190) 249,414 (7,338,374) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 3,382,484 3,133,070 10,471,444 Cash and cash equivalents end of period $ 2,926,294 $ 3,382,484 $ 3,133,070 Supplemental Cash Flow Information Cash paid during the year for: Interest $ 2,369,389 $ 1,572,642 $1,800,598 Income taxes $ 8,142,405 $ 3,466,100 $5,088,465 Excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were the following effects of non-cash investing and financing activities: Non-cash business combination: Investment in subsidiary $ 2,405,145 Accrued liability (2,405,145) Non-cash transfer of assets: Trade receivables $ 1,200,000 Notes receivables (1,200,000) Capital stock issued for purchase of subsidiary: Investment in subsidiary $1,047,996 Capital stock (17,467) Additional paid-in capital (1,030,529) (2,667,125) Non-cash purchase of assets: Property, plant and equipment $ 547,587 Accrued liability (547,587) Non-cash assets assumed in connection with recourse customer financing: Notes receivables $ 369,229 Inventory (369,229)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 1995, and 19941995 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Astec Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries at December 31, 1996,1997 are as follows: Astec, Inc. Production Engineered Products, Inc. Astec Financial Services, Inc. Roadtec, Inc. CEI Enterprises, Inc. Telsmith, Inc. Heatec, Inc. Trencor, Inc. Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company's investment in a 50% owned joint venture, Pavement Technology, Inc., is accounted for on an equity basis. As discussed in Notes 2 and 3, in 1995 the Company sold Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH ("Wibau-Astec") and abandoned Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik ("Gibat Ohl"). in 1995. Use of Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash Equivalents - The Company considers allconsidersall highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Inventories - Inventories (excluding used equipment) are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. Used equipment inventories are stated on the specific unit cost method, which in the aggregate is less than market. Property and Equipment - Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: buildings - 40 years(40 years) and equipment - 3(3 to 10 years.years). Both accelerated and straight-line methods are used for tax reporting purposes. Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill amounts are being amortized using the straight-line method over twenty20 years. Additions to goodwill reflect the purchase of assets and liabilities by Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. in 1996 reflect1997 and the purchase of Production Engineered Products, Inc. in 1996. Accumulated amortization balances netted against goodwill were $1,320,000 and $1,040,000 at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Product Warranty - The Company provides product warranties against defects in materials and workmanship for periods ranging from ninety days to one year following the date of sale. Estimated costs of product warranties are charged to cost of sales in the period of the sale. Income Taxes - IncomeThe Company accounts for income taxes have been provided using the liability method in accordance with SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "AccountingAccounting for Income Taxes".Taxes. Revenue Recognition - A portion of the Company's equipment sales represents equipment produced in the Company's plants under short-term contracts for a specific customer project or equipment designed to meet a customer's specific requirements. Equipment revenues are recognized in compliance with the terms and conditions of each contract, which is ordinarily at the time the equipment is shipped. Certain contracts include terms and conditions through which the Company recognizedrecognizes revenues upon completion of equipment production which is subsequently stored at the Company's plant at the customer's request. Revenue is recorded on such contracts upon the customer's assumption of title and all risks of ownership. Advertising Expense - The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $2,054,000, $2,661,000 $2,199,000, and $1,504,000$2,199,000 in advertising costs during 1997, 1996 1995, and 1994,1995, respectively. Foreign Currency Translation - The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. Dollars in accordance with SFAS No. 52, "ForeignForeign Currency Translation." All balance sheet accounts have been translated using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts have been translated using the average exchange rate for the year. TheTranslation gains and losses resulting from the changes in exchange rates from year to year have been reported separately as a component of shareholders' equity. Stock Based Compensation - The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock options granted in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "AccountingAccounting for Stock Issued to Employees"Employees and, accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for the stock option grants. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123, "AccountingAccounting for Stock-based Compensation," in 1996 and is utilizing the disclosure only option permitted by the statement. See Note 11. Earnings Per Share - PrimaryIn 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. SFAS No. 128 replaced the calculation of primary and fully diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of commonwith basic and common equivalent shares outstanding and include the potentiallydiluted earnings per share. Unlike primary earnings per share, basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share is very similar to the exercisepreviously reported fully diluted earnings per share. All earnings per share amounts for all periods have been presented, and where appropriate, restated to conform to the requirements of SFAS No. 128. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Numerator: Net income $13,809,414 $4,344,876 $4,560,360 Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings per share 9,555,940 10,047,442 10,071,931 Effect of dilutive securities: Employee stock options in years where there are earnings. Fully170,156 111,216 123,986 Denominator for diluted earnings per share are not presented for 1996, 1995, or 1994 since the dilution is not material.$ 9,726,096 $10,158,658 $10,195,917 Earnings per common share: Basic $1.45 $.43 $.45 Diluted $1.42 $.43 $.45 Impairment of Assets - In 1995, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121, "AccountingAccounting for the Impairment of Long-LivedLong-lived Assets and for Long-LivedLong-lived Assets to Bebe Disposed of." SFAS No. 121 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations, including goodwill and other intangible assets, when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. SFAS No. 121 also addresses the accounting for long-lived assets that are expected to be disposed of. During 1995, events and circumstances indicated that approximately $4,400,000 of assets of the Company's subsidiary, Astec-Europa might be impaired. As further discussed in Note 3, these assets were written off in connection with the abandonment of Astec-Europa. Reclassifications - Certain amounts for 1995 and 19941996 have been reclassified to conform with the 19961997 presentation. 2. BusinessAccounting Policies Not Yet Adopted - In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income and Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Statement No. 130 establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. Statement No. 131 generally requires that companies report segment information for operating segments which are revenue producing components and for which separate financial information is produced internally. The Company plans to adopt Statement No. 130 and Statement No. 131 in 1998, but has not yet Accounting Policies completed its analysis of the impact, if any, that Statement No. 131 may have on its financial statements. Statement No. 130 is not anticipated to have a material impact when adopted by the Company. 2.Business Combinations On December 2, 1997, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Construction Equipment Division of Portec, Inc. for $19,978,176 in cash. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the operating results of the new company, Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. ("K-P"), have been included in the Company's consolidated statements of income from the effective date of acquisition. That portion of the purchase price in excess of the fair market value of the assets acquired was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. The purchase was initially financed under the Company's revolving credit agreement but was structured in such a way to allow the utilization of industrial revenue bonds in the future. In connection with the acquisition, the Company and K-P entered into an equipment lease with First Chicago NBD under which the Company and K-P lease machinery and equipment. The terms of the equipment leases range from 36 to 84 months, with total monthly lease payments of approximately $69,000. These are included in the lease commitments in Note 6. Effective December 1, 1996, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Production Engineered Products, Inc. ("PEP") in exchange for $2,405,145 in cash. The operations of PEP are included in the consolidated statements of income from the effective date of acquisition. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and the purchase price of $2,405,145 was allocated to the net tangible assets acquired based on the estimated fair market value of the assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of PEP's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. On February 28, 1995, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Trace Industries, Inc., a New Mexico corporation doing business as CEI Enterprises ("CEI"), in exchange for 87,333 shares of the Company's common stock and approximately $852,000 in cash. The operations of CEI areCEI-are included in the consolidated statements of income from the effective date of acquisition. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and the purchase price of approximately $1,900,000 was allocated to the net tangible assets acquired based on the estimated fair market value of the assets acquired. That portion of the purchase price in excess of the fair market value of CEI's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. Effective July 1, 1993,A summary of the Company entered into a joint venture with Putzmeister-Werk Maschinenfabrik GmbH (""Putzmeister") to form a new German limited-liability company, Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH ("Wibau- Astec"). Wibau-Astec designed, engineered, manufacturednet assets acquired is as follows: K-P PEP CEI Current assets $16,530,866 $1,292,161 $1,035,148 Property, plant and marketed asphalt plants, stabilization plants, asphalt and thermal heaters, hot storage systems and soil remediation equipment. Putzmeister andequipment 4,714,500 551,289 243,877 Other assets 1,035,735 Current liabilities (5,032,911) (243,511) (768,647) Other liabilities (492,000) (1,094,453) (39,683) Goodwill 3,221,736 1,734,865 1,411,892 Net assets acquired excluding cash 19,977,926 2,240,351 1,882,587 Cash 250 164,794 17,413 Net assets acquired $19,978,176 $2,405,145 $1,900,000 The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the Company each owned 50% of Wibau-Astec. On November 7, 1994, the Company acquired the remaining shares of Wibau-Astec from Putzmeister for $67,400. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase effective November 7, 1994 and accordingly, theconsolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions discussed above had occurred at the beginning of the period preceding the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and accountsdo not purport to be indicative of Wibau-Astec subsequent to November 7, 1994 are includedthe results that would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at the beginning of the periods presented or of results which may occur in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The purchase price was allocated to the net tangible assets of Wibau-Astec based on the estimated fair market value of the assets acquired. As required by the purchase method of accounting, the excess amount of the purchase price over the fair value of Wibau- Astec's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and was being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. Subsequent to the acquisition of Wibau-Astec, the Company undertook a plan to restructure Wibau-Astec'sfuture. Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Net sales $300,336,000 $257,913,000 $247,256,000 Income from operations (see Note 12 - Restructuring Costs).26,363,000 10,372,000 6,303,000 Net income 14,917,000 5,459,000 4,630,000 Per common share outstanding: Basic $ 1.56 $ .54 $ .46 Diluted $ 1.53 $ .54 $ .46 Effective June 30, 1995, the Company sold Wibau-Astec to Wirtgen Gesellschaft mit beschrankter Haftung for approximately $1,109,000. For the six months ended June 30, 1995, Wibau-Astec had a net loss of approximately $688,000. The Company realized a gain of approximately $2,449,000 on the sale of Wibau-Astec. Effective October 17, 1994, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik ("Gibat Ohl") in exchange for 193,357 shares of the Company's common stock and approximately $2,760,000 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase effective October 17, 1994, and accordingly, the results of operations and accounts of Gibat Ohl subsequent to October 17, 1994 are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The purchase price of approximately $5,460,000 was allocated to the net tangible assets of Gibat Ohl based on the estimated fair market value of the assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of Gibat Ohl's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and was being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. During 1995, Gibat Ohl's name was changed to Astec-Europa and in February 1996, the Company abandoned Astec-Europa. See Note 3. A summary of the net assets acquired is as follows:
PEP CEI Wibau-Astec Gibat Ohl Current assets $1,292,161 $1,035,148 $4,938,766 $ 11,007,164 Property, plant and equipment 551,289 243,877 412,193 300,657 Current liabilities (243,511) (768,647) (8,678,984) (10,029,223) Other liabilities (1,094,453) (39,683) (2,038,165) Goodwill 1,734,865 1,411,892 1,193,259 4,153,364 Net assets acquired excluding cash 2,240,351 1,882,587 (4,172,931) 5,431,962 Cash 164,794 17,413 4,240,331 32,984 Net assets acquired $ 2,405,145 $1,900,000 $ 67,400 $ 5,464,946
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions discussed above had occurred at the beginning of each of the periods presented. Pro forma adjustments have been made to 1994 to reflect the restructuring of Wibau-Astec as described in Note 12. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have incurred had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented or of results which may occur in the future. Year Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994 Net sales $ 224,927,000 $ 247,256,000 $ 227,891,000 Income from operations 8,219,000 6,303,000 28,814,000 Net income 4,400,000 4,630,000 24,863,000 Per common and common equivalent share: Net income $ .44 $ .46 $ 2.53 Prior to its acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Wibau- Astec, the Company's investment in Wibau-Astec was accounted for by the equity method. Accordingly, net income as presented in the Consolidated Statement of Income for 1994 includes the Company's share of Wibau-Astec's losses for the period prior to the acquisition of $3,177,000. 3. Abandonment3.Abandonment of Foreign Subsidiary During 1995, the Company's subsidiary, Astec-Europa, incurred a net loss of approximately Subsidiary $2,354,000 and had a negative net worth at December 31, 1995. The Company determined that it would no longer support Astec-Europa and on February 9, 1996, Astec-Europa management filed a request for bankruptcy in Germany. Due to its decision to abandon Astec- Europa,Astec-Europa, the Company willhas not recoverrecovered any amounts related to Astec-Europa'sAstec- Europa's assets nor willhas it bebeen required to liquidate Astec- Europa's liabilities except to the extent such liabilities were guaranteed by the Company. Accordingly, Astec-Europa's assets and liabilities at December 31, 1995 were adjusted to liquidation basis values. This, along with the write-off of the Company's investment in Astec-Europa and the remaining goodwill associated with Astec-Europa of approximately $3,911,000 resulted in a total write-off related to the abandonment of approximately $7,037,000 before tax and $3,683,000 after tax. Total losses recognized in 1995, including net loss from operations and the loss on abandonment, related to Astec-Europa were approximately $9,945,000 before tax or $6,037,000 after tax. 4. Inventories Inventories consisted of the following: December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Raw materials and parts $ 23,541,508 $23,709,839$27,986,696 $23,541,508 Work-in-process 15,920,137 9,038,158 10,384,847 Finished goods 19,911,602 16,994,736 14,583,127 Used equipment 5,576,916 7,189,683 7,204,866 Total $ 56,764,085 $55,882,679$69,395,351 $56,764,085 5. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consisted of the following: December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Land, land improvements and buildings $ 38,161,554 $ 35,220,996$42,659,308 $38,161,554 Equipment 48,175,111 41,217,853 39,322,961 Less accumulated depreciation (31,339,876) (26,829,232) (22,864,623) Land, buildings and equipment - net 59,494,543 52,550,175 51,679,334 Rental property: Equipment 2,517,574 2,004,118 122,347 Less accumulated depreciation (406,964) (236,941) (92,648) Rental property - net 2,110,610 1,767,177 29,699 Total $ 54,317,352 $ 51,709,033$61,605,153 $54,317,352 6. Leases The Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment which are used in its operations. Total rental expense charged to operations under operating leases was approximately $1,569,000, $1,272,000 $1,213,000, and $615,000$1,213,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 1995 and 19941995, respectively. Minimum rental commitments for all noncancelable operating leases at December 31, 19961997 are as follows: 19971998 $ 766,000 1998 542,0001,742,000 1999 359,0001,456,000 2000 238,0001,202,000 2001 208,000 2002 and beyond 80,00021,000 The Company also leases equipment to customers under short- termshort-term contracts generally ranging from two months to twenty- fourforty-eight months. Rental income under such leases was $1,181,000, $2,073,000 $1,630,000, and $1,394,000$1,630,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, and 1994, respectively. Scheduled minimumMinimum rental payments to be received for equipment leased to others during the yearsat December 31, 1997 throughare as follows: 1998 and in total thereafter are $263,000, $114,000 and $0, respectively. 7. Long-term$ 322,000 1999 208,000 2000 178,000 2001 33,000 7.Long-term Debt Long-term debt consisted of the following: December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Revolving credit loan of $22,000,000$70,000,000 available through November 22, 2002 at interest rates from 6.6% to 8.25% at December 31, 1996 and 1995, available through June 30, 19991997 $23,230,000 Revolving credit loan of $22,000,000 at interest rates from 6.69% to 8.0% at December 31, 1996 and 8.25% at December 31, 1995 $ 13,322,000 $ 4,150,000$13,322,000 Revolving credit loan of $15,000,000 at December 31, 1996 available through June 30, 1999 at an interest rate of prime, which was 8.25% at December 31, 199631,1996 2,508,000 Loans payable maturing at various dates through 2000 at interest rates from 8.0% to 9.25% 2,639,307 274,274 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds payable in annual installments through 2006 at weekly negotiated interest rates 4,500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds due in 2019 at weekly negotiated interest rates 8,000,000 8,000,000 Loan payable to related party at an interest rate of prime less a quarter, which was 8.0% at December 31, 1996 1,078,430 Total long-term debt 35,730,000 32,547,737 17,924,274 Less current maturities 500,000 2,051,003 774,274 Long-term debt less current maturities $ 30,496,734 $ 17,150,000$35,230,000 $30,496,734 The Company has a $22,000,000$70,000,000 revolving line of credit agreement with First Chicago NBD. The agreement contains borrowing sub-limits which allow the Company and its subsidiary, Astec Financial Services, Inc., to borrow up to $50,000,000 and $30,000,000 respectively, not to exceed the total commitment amount. Advances under Astec Financial's sub-limit are limited to eligible receivables as defined in the agreement. Amounts outstanding under the agreement bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate offrom .25% below prime less one quarterto prime plus .50%, or from .75% to 2.00% above the London Interbank Offering Rate plus one.Rate. The interest rate applied to borrowings is based upon a leverage ratio, calculated quarterly, as defined by the credit agreement. The credit agreement contains certain restrictive covenants relative to operating ratios and capital expenditures and also restrictsal the payment of dividends. The Company also has a $15,000,000This agreement replaced two separate revolving credit agreementfacilities with an aggregate availability of $37,000,000. The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc., which is available to Astec Financial Services, Inc. Amounts outstanding under the agreement bearformer agreements also bore interest at a rate ofrates based on prime or LIBOR and are limited to "Eligible Receivables" as defined in the agreement. The credit agreement containscontained certain restrictive covenants relativesimilar to operating ratios and maintenance of net worth and also restrictsthose in the payment of dividends.new agreement. Loan payable to related party at December 31, 1996 was a note payable to the Company's Chief Executive Officer. Interest expense related to this note for 1996 was calculated at the Company's current bank borrowing rate and was approximately $73,000.$1,580 in 1997 and $73,000 in 1996. This loan was paid off in January 1997. The aggregate of all maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years is as follows: 1997 $ 2,051,000 1998 1,974,000$500,000 1999 16,803,000500,000 2000 720,000500,000 2001 500,000 2002 and beyond 11,000,00033,730,000 For 1996,1997, the weighted average interest rate on short termshort-term borrowings, which includes current maturities of Industrial Revenue Bonds, was 7.12%3.90%. 8. Retirement Benefits The Company provides a deferred savings plan ("Savings Plan") under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, under which substantially all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to participate. The Savings Plan provides that the Company match is an amount equal to 50% of employee savings subject to certain limitations.limitations or 30% of employee savings, subject to certain limitations, for employees of Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. The total expense for such matching was approximately $856,000, $799,000 $777,000 and $696,000$777,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, and 1994, respectively. A former subsidiary of the Company, the Barber-Greene Company, had defined benefit pension plans ("Barber-Greene Plans") covering substantially all of its employees. Non-union benefits were frozen as of September 1, 1986, and certain union benefits were frozen as of October 31, 1986. The Company retained responsibility for the Barber-Greene Plans when it sold the Barber-Greene Company in 1991. Telsmith, Inc. also sponsors a defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees hired prior to October 14, 1987 who have chosen not to participate in the Company's 401(k) savings plan. The benefit is based on years of benefit service multiplied by a monthly benefit as specified in the plan. The Company's funding policy for its pension plans is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. During 1994, the Company made the decision to terminate the Barber-Greene Plans and purchased annuities to fund the benefits provided for in the plans. In 1995, the Company received approval from the Internal Revenue Service to terminate the plans. As a result, the settlement loss of approximately $46,000 is included in Other income-net in 1995. A reconciliation of the funded status of the Plans,Plan, which is based on a valuation date of September 30, with amounts reported in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Actuarial present value of benefit obligations: Vested $ 3,039,628 $ 2,991,159$3,179,694 $3,039,628 Nonvested 94,386 88,965 90,781 Accumulated benefit obligation $$3,274,080 3,128,593 $ 3,081,940 Projected benefit obligation $$3,274,080 3,128,593 $ 3,081,940 Plan assets at fair value 2,982,882 2,583,682 2,539,151 Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets 291,198 544,911 542,789 Unrecognized net gain (loss) 138,707 (127,150) 6,046 Prior service cost not yet recognized in net periodic pension cost (109,591) (129,205) (148,819) Additional liability 256,355 Pension liability in the consolidated balance sheets $ 544,911320,314 $ 400,016544,911 Net periodic pension cost for 1997, 1996 1995 and 19941995 included the following components: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 Service cost - benefits earned during the period $ 15,382 $ 20,986 $ 24,585 $ 31,503 Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 222,812 227,815 219,465 2,565,355 Actual return on plan assets (623,731) (122,607) (238,493) 2,148,873 Net amortization and deferral 417,295 (84,816) (6,682) (5,405,871) Net expense (income) $ 31,758 $ 41,378 $(1,125) $ (660,140)(1,125) The weighted average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 7.5% at September 30, 19961997 and 1995.1996. The expected long-term rate of return on assets was 9.0% for the years ending September 30, 19961997 and 1995.1996. Plan assets are primarily comprised of corporate equity and corporate and U.S. Treasury debt securities. In addition to the retirement plans discussed above, the Company has an unfunded post-retirement medical and life insurance plan covering employees of its Telsmith, Inc. subsidiary and retirees of its former Barber-Greene subsidiary. The plan is accounted for under the provision of SFAS No. 106, "EmployeesEmployers' Accounting for Post-retirementPost- retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions." The accumulated post-retirementpost- retirement benefit obligation ("APBO") at adoption was approximately $674,000 and is being amortized over 20 years. The accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation and the amount recognized in the Company's consolidated balance sheets is as follows: December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation: Retirees $ 241,700 $ 246,300$271,235 $241,700 Active employees 499,068 471,000 393,500770,303 712,700 639,800 Unamortized transition obligation (504,500) (538,200) (571,900) Unrecognized net gain 2,875 64,100 118,800 Accrued post-retirement benefit cost $ 238,600 $ 186,700$268,678 $238,600 Net periodic post-retirement benefit cost included the following components: December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Service cost $ 64,70056,468 $ 53,30064,700 Interest cost 55,241 48,300 50,200 Amortization of transition obligation 33,700 33,700 Amortization of net gain (1,900)(1,473) Net expense $ 146,700 $ 135,300$143,936 $146,700 A discount rate of 7.5%7.0% was used in calculating the APBO. The APBO assumes a 13.0%7.5% increase in per capita health care costs decreasing gradually to 5.8%5.5% for years 20122001 and later. A 1% increase in the medical inflation rate would increase the APBO by approximately $36,000$42,000 and the expense by approximately $8,900.$7,700. 9. Income Taxes For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes includes the following components: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 United States $22,738,605 $ 6,655,652 $ 16,497,616 $ 30,726,395$16,497,616 Foreign: License income 227,786 362,506 277,855 404,000 Equity in loss of joint venture (3,176,834) Loss from foreign subsidiaries (3,597,796) (2,217,061) Loss on abandonment (7,037,105) Income before income taxes $ 7,018,158$22,966,391 $7,018,158 $ 6,140,570 $ 25,736,500 The provision for income taxes consisted of the following: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 Current $ 1,416,242 $ 1,166,956 $ 7,029,419$9,264,743 $1,416,242 $1,166,956 Deferred provision (benefit) (107,766) 1,257,040 413,254 (4,729,293) Total provision for income taxes $ 2,673,282 $ 1,580,210 $ 2,300,126$9,156,977 $2,673,282 $1,580,210 A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the statutory rate to those provided is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 Tax at statutory rates $ 2,386,174 $ 2,087,794 $ 9,007,775$8,038,237 $2,386,174 $2,087,794 Effect of utilization of net operating loss carryforwards net of alternative minimum tax (1,344,000) (3,008,000) Effect of utilization of alternative minimum tax credits (382,000) Benefit from foreign sales corporation (360,000) (125,000) (327,000) (265,000) State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 912,000 424,000 522,000 212,000 Income taxes of other countries 38,000 20,000 (553,000) 27,000 Loss from foreign operations (413,000) 2,636,000 Recognition of deferred tax asset 1,827,000 (4,729,000) Reversal of prior temporary differences (1,937,000) Other items 528,740 (31,892) (219,584) 738,351 Income taxes $ 2,673,282 $ 1,580,210 $ 2,300,126$9,156,977 $2,673,282 $1,580,210 At December 31, 1996,1997, the Company had long-term capital loss carryforwards of approximately $709,000$80,000 expiring in 2000. As a result of utilizing the net operating loss carryforwards, net income from continuing operations increased by approximately $.13 and $.31 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.1995. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. At December 31, 1996,1997, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $6,218,000,$6,248,700, and deferred tax liabilities of approximately $3,011,000,$3,492,000, related to temporary differences and tax loss carryforwards. At December 31, 1996, a valuation allowance of approximately $241,000 was recorded. This valuation allowance offsets the deferred tax asset relative to capital loss carryforwards. Due to the uncertainty of the utilization and expected utilization of these carryforwards, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was necessary for this item. The change in valuation allowance in 19961997 is due to the expirationutilization of ITC credit carryforwards ($98,000) and the establishment of a valuation allowance relative to the capital loss carryforwards ($241,000).carryfowards. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 Deferred tax assets: Inventory reserves $ 1,556,000 $ 1,812,000$1,878,300 $1,556,000 Warranty reserves 1,098,400 898,000 939,939,000 Accrued insurance 820,800 864,000 725,000 Bad debt reserves 507,000 479,000 505,000 Other accrued expenses 1,695,700 1,428,000 1,455,000 Alternative minimum tax credit 98,500 560,000 Foreign net operating loss carryforwards 1,384,000 Other credit carryforwards 150,000 433,000 98,000 Total deferred tax assets 6,248,700 6,218,000 6,918,000 Deferred tax liabilities: Property and equipment 3,176,300 2,793,000 2,475,000 Other 316,300 218,000 29,000 Total deferred tax liabilities 3,492,600 3,011,000 2,504,000 Net deferred tax assets 2,756,100 3,207,000 4,414,000 Valuation allowance (241,000) (98,000) Deferred tax asset $ 2,966,000 $ 4,316,000$2,756,100 $2,966,000 10. Contingencies The Company's subsidiary, Telsmith, was a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by Nordberg, Inc., a manufacturer of a competing line of rock crushing equipment, seeking monetary damages and an injunction to cease an alleged infringement of a patent on certain components used in the production of its rock crushing equipment. On March 30, 1995, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin issued a ruling in favor of the Company and entered a declaratory judgment in favor of Telsmith, and against Plaintiff Nordberg, Inc. The Court also entered judgment in favor of Telsmith, Inc. and against Nordberg, Inc., dismissing Nordberg's claim of infringement against Telsmith. During 1993, the Company was also named as a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by Gencor, Inc., a manufacturer of a competing line of asphalt plants. On February 3, 1996, the jury returned a verdict in the Company's favor. In early July 1996, the Company and Gencor entered into a settlement of the case on appeal and two other lawsuits pending between the parties. Under the terms of the settlement, each of the pending cases was dismissed, with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs. No payments were made by either party to the other in connection with the settlement as a result of which all litigation between the Company and Gencor is now ended. During 1994, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear CMI Corporation's petition to overturn the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's reversal of patent damages awarded to CMI Corporation and Robert L. Mendenhall by a lower court. As a result of the Supreme Court's refusal to grant certiorari, the Company received $12,917,000 which was being held in escrow pending the Company's appeal of the two judgments. In addition, on December 31, 1994, the Company received $1,309,000 from CMI in satisfaction of the judgment entered in favor of the Company on its counterclaim against CMI. The receipt of these funds effectively concluded the litigation between the Company and CMI and Robert L. Mendenhall which had been pending for a number of years. As a result, in 1994 the Company reversed its accrued liability for patent damages. The reversal of $13,870,000 in accrued patent damages and the receipt of $1,309,000 in patent damages from CMI total $15,179,000 and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments). Management has reviewed all claims and lawsuits and, upon the advice of counsel, has made provision for any estimable losses; however, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the outstanding claims and lawsuits. Recourse Customer Financing - Certain customers have financed purchases of the Company's products through arrangements in which the Company is contingently liable for customer debt aggregating approximately $4,618,000$1,793,000 and $7,362,000$4,618,000 at December 31, 19961997 and 1995,1996, respectively. These obligations average five years in duration and have minimal risk. Other - The Company is contingently liable for letters of credit of approximately $2,491,000$12,993,000 issued for bid bonds and performance bonds. Astec Financial Services, Inc. has sold both finance and operating leases with limited recourse, subject to elimination of recourse responsibilities through remarketing of equipment. The limited recourse would not exceed 15% of the purchase price. 11. Shareholders' Equity The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "AccountingAccounting for Stock Issued to Employees"Employees (APB 25) and related Interpretationsinterpretations in accounting for its employee stock options because, as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, "AccountingAccounting for Stock-based Compensation," requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 25, becausewhen the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is generally recognized. The Company has reserved 300,000 shares of common stock under the 1986 Stock Option Plan and 500,000 shares of common stock under the 1992 Stock Option Plan for issuance upon exercise of non-qualified options, incentivenon- qualified options and stock appreciation rightsincentive options to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries at prices determined by the Board of Directors. All options granted have ten-year terms and vest and become fully exercisable immediately or within one year of the grant date. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1996,1997, respectively; risk-free interest rates of 5.93%, 6.06%, 6.04% and 6.04%5.78%; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of .275;.275, .275 and .281; and a weighted-average expected life of the option of fiveseven and one half years. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's pro forma information follows. 1997 1996 1995 1994 Pro forma net income $ 3,734,000 $ 4,362,000 $ 23,177,000$13,782,000 $3,734,000 $4,362,000 Pro forma earnings per share: PrimaryBasic $ 1.44 $ .37 $ .43 Diluted $ 2.351.42 $ .37 $ .43 A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 1995, and 19941995 follows: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 Weighted Avg. Weighted Avg. Weighted Avg. Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price Options outstanding, beginning
beginning of year 549,000 $9.23 308,000 $ 8.33 244,000 $ 6.92 170,000 $ 2.35 Options granted 10,000 $9.13 250,000 $ 10.17 67,000 $ 13.26 87,000 $ 15.22Options forfeited 23,000 $9.39 Options exercised 10,000 $6.50 9,000 $ 4.68 3,000 $ 3.25 13,000 $ 2.67 Options outstanding and exercisable, end of year 526,000 $ 9.28 549,000 $ 9.23 308,000 $ 8.33 244,000 $ 6.92
The weighted average fair value of options granted whose exercise price was equal to the market price of the stock on the grant date was $4.14, $3.97 $4.65, and $4.66$4.65 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 1995, and 1994.1995. The weighted average fair value of options granted whose exercise price exceeded the market price of the stock on the grant date was $3.14 $4.13, and $4.05$4.13 for the years ended December 31, 1996 1995, and 1994.1995. Exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 1996,1997 range from $1.38 to $16.36.$3.25 (128,000 options) and from $9.13 to $16.36 (398,000 options). The Company has adopted a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement and declared a distribution of one right (the "Right") for each outstanding share of Company common stock, par value $0.20 per share (the "Common Stock"). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share (a "Unit") of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), at a purchase price of $36.00 per Unit, subject to adjustment. The rights currently attach to the certificates representing shares of outstanding Company Common Stock, and no separate Rights certificates will be distributed. The Rights will separate from the Common Stock upon the earlier of ten business days (unless otherwise delayed by the Board) following the (i) public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (the "Acquiring Person") has acquired, obtained the right to acquire, or otherwise obtained beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock, or (ii) commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in an Acquiring Person beneficially owning 15% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Board of Directors may terminate the Rights without any payment to the holders thereof at any time prior to the close of business ten business days following announcement by the Company that a person has become an Acquiring Person. The Rights, which do not have voting power and are not entitled to dividends, expire on December 21, 2005. In the event of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or other transaction in which shares of Common Stock are exchanged, each Unit of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the per share amount paid in respect of each share of Common Stock. 12. Restructuring Costs In the fourth quarter of 1994, the Company developed and implemented a plan to restructure the operations of Wibau- Astec. In connection with the restructuring, the Company accrued costs of $1,500,000 ($1,250,000, net of tax, or $0.12 per share). The plan included, among other things, the cessation of manufacturing operations at Wibau-Astec along with related personnel reductions as well as personnel reductions in engineering and administration. Total personnel reductions were approximately 150. The plan was communicated to employees and severance notices given during the fourth quarter of 1994. As of the end of 1994, the restructuring was substantially complete. Total costs incurred were for the write- down of certain assets to estimated fair market value, severance payments and lease termination expenses. Severance costs and exit costs incurred were approximately $1,137,000 and $363,000, respectively. Costs incurred during 1995 were substantially the same as the amounts accrued as of December 31, 1994. Wibau-Astec sold Astec asphalt plants either manufactured in the United States or subcontracted in Europe. Wibau-Astec also sold Wibau-Astec parts and serviced a large customer base and utilized subcontractors as needed for parts and/or manufacturing components in Europe. As described in Note 2, Wibau-Astec was sold in 1995. 13. Financial Instruments Credit Risk - The Company sells products to a wide variety of customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level which management believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses. As of December 31, 1996,1997, concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited due to the wide variety of customers. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The book value of the Company's financial instruments approximates their fair values. Financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, finance receivables, accounts payable and long- and short-term debt. Substantially all of the company'sCompany's short- and long-term debt is floating rate debt and, accordingly, book value approximates its fair value. 14.13. Operations by Industry Segment and Geographic Area The Company operates predominately in one industry segment. Its products are used for road construction and for the manufacture and processing of construction aggregates. Net sales and net losses of foreign operations were $24,748,000 and $3,044,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 and $10,133,000 and $5,394,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994.1995. See Notes 2 and 3. International sales by domestic subsidiaries by major geographic region were as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 Asia $14,217,777 $12,340,130 $22,294,203 $14,680,301 Europe 3,076,510 8,792,885 11,257,809 3,651,822 South America 10,000,648 6,889,869 3,811,091 4,662,530 Canada 8,618,053 3,852,792 8,105,164 4,007,019 Australia 4,298,554 1,760,828 1,613,920 413,368 Africa 444,313 1,131,318 3,220,047 9,594,267 Central America 7,461,261 1,381,030 5,955,227 13,285,042Middle East 5,224,857 467,146 293,006 West Indies 2,998,406 1,692,600 2,414,219 Other 2,159,746 2,707,225 1,736,6982,561,868 TOTAL $58,902,247 $38,308,598 $58,964,686 $52,031,047 15.14. Finance Receivables Finance receivables are receivables of Astec Financial Services, Inc. Contractual maturities of outstanding receivables at December 31, 19961997 were: Financing Amounts Due In Leases Notes Total 19971998 $ 1,330,422933,951 $ 1,829,8191,789,896 $ 3,160,241 1998 524,585 980,668 1,505,2532,723,847 1999 481,585 301,514 783,09975,600 392,132 467,732 2000 229,745 153,000 382,74537,800 408,629 446,429 2001 422,805 422,805 Thereafter 115,117 115,117 2,681,454 3,265,001 5,946,455906,494 906,494 1,047,351 3,919,956 4,967,307 Less Unearned Income 356,685 363,814 720,499unearned income (50,553) (171,723) (222,276) Total $ 2,324,769996,798 $ 2,901,1873,748,233 $ 5,225,9564,745,031 Receivables may be paid prior to contractual maturity generally by payment of a prepayment penalty. At December 31, 1996,1997, there were no impaired loans or leases. Recognition of income on finance receivables is suspended when management determines that collection of future income is not probable. Accrual is resumed if the receivable becomes contractually current and collection doubts are removed--previouslyare removed -- previously suspended income is recognized at that time. Astec Financial Services, Inc.'s net investment in financing leases at December 31, 1996 consisted of the following components: Total minimum lease payment receivables $ 2,681,454 Less: unearned income 356,685 Net investment in financing leases $ 2,324,769 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Shareholders Astec Industries, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee February 21, 1997 CORPORATE INFORMATION Corporate and Subsidiary Executive Officers
J. Don Brock Chairman of the Board and President Richard W. Bethea, Jr. Vice President, Corporate Counsel, and Secretary F. McKamy Hall Vice President, Corporate Controller, and Treasurer W. Norman Smith President, Astec, Inc. Robert G. Stafford President, Telsmith, Inc. Thomas R. Campbell President, Roadtec, Inc. Roger Sandberg President, Trencor, Inc. James G. May President, Heatec, Inc. Albert E. Guth President, Astec Financial Services, Inc. Board of Directors J. Don Brock +#Chairman of the Board and President George C. Dillon *Former Chairman, Manville Corporation Ronald W. Dunmire *+#Former President of Cedarapids, Inc. Daniel K. Frierson *Chairman and CEO, Dixie Yarns Inc. Albert E. Guth President, Astec Financial Services, Inc. G. W. Jones *Former President of APAC, Inc. William B. Sansom *Chairman and CEO , The H.T. Hackney Co. E.D. Sloan, Jr. *Chairman of the Board, Nolas Trading Co, Inc. W. Norman Smith +#President, Astec, Inc. Robert G. Stafford #President, Telsmith, Inc.
*Member of the Audit and Compensation Committees +Member of the Executive Committee #Member of the Technical Committee Subsidiaries Astec Financial Services, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee Astec, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee CEI Enterprises, Inc. Albuquerque, New Mexico Heatec, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee Production Engineered Products, Inc. Walnut, Illinois Roadtec, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee Telsmith, Inc. Mequon, Wisconsin Trencor, Inc. Grapevine, Texas Transfer Agent Registrar Chase Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. Overpeck Centre 85 Challenger Road Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 Stock Exchange NASDAQ National Market - ASTE Auditors Ernst & Young LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee General Counsel and Litigation Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C. Chattanooga, Tennessee Securities Counsel Alston & Bird Atlanta, Georgia Corporate Office Astec Industries, Inc. 4101 Jerome Avenue P.O. Box 72787 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407 Telephone 423-867-4210 The Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may be obtained at no cost by any shareholder upon written request to Astec Industries, Inc., attention Shareholder Relations. The Annual Meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 24, 1997, in the Training Center at the Corporate office located at 4101 Jerome Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee. REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Shareholders Astec Industries, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996.1997. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 19961997 and 1995,1996, and the consolidated results of itstheir operations and itstheir cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996,1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP ERNST & YOUNG LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee February 21, 1997 A-24 20, 1998 A-23 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE (VIII)(II) VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 AND 1994 ADDITIONS CHARGES TO BEGINNING COSTS & OTHER ENDING
DESCRIPTION BALANCE EXPENSES ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE December 31, 1996: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,278,638 $ 157,183 $ 0 $ 168,882(1) $ 1,266,939 Reserve for inventory $ 5,438,510 $ 1,231,828 $ 0 $ 1,796,416 $ 4,873,922 Other Reserves: Product warranty $ 2,470,775 $ 3,018,990 $ 0 $ 3,125,060(2) $ 2,364,705 December 31, 1995: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,684,242 $ 533,136 $ 20,000(3) $ 958,740 (1) $ 1,278,638 Reserve for inventory $ 4,994,035 $ 1,196,876 $ 0 $ 752,401 $ 5,438,510 Other Reserves: Product warranty $ 3,470,703 $ 3,194,240 $ 0 $ 4,194,168(2) $ 2,470,775 Schedule (VIII) - Page 1 A-25 December 31, 1994: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,191,083 $ 362,089 $ 467,607(3) $ 336,537 (1) $ 1,684,242 Reserve for inventory $ 6,494,533 $ 3,621,218 $ 0 $ 5,121,716 $ 4,994,035 Other Reserves: Product warranty $ 1,781,733 $ 2,616,565 $ 0 $ 927,595 (2) $3,470,703 Reserve for patent damages $ 13,250,048 $ 620,290 $ 0 $ 13,870,338ADDITIONS CHARGES TO BEGINNING COSTS & OTHER ENDING DESCRIPTION BALANCE EXPENSES ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE December 31, 1997: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,266,939 $ 272,578 $ 523,507(3) $ 509,787(1) $1,553,237 accounts Reserve for inventory $4,873,922 $ 418,906 $ 0
$ 964,658 $4,328,170 Other Reserves: Product warranty $2,364,705 $2,811,009 $ 173,900(3) $2,143,242(2) $3,206,372 ADDITIONS CHARGES TO BEGINNING COSTS & OTHER ENDING DESCRIPTION BALANCE EXPENSES ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE December 31, 1996: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,278,638 $ 157,183 $ 0 $ 168,882(1) $1,266,939 Reserve for inventory $5,438,510 $1,231,828 $ 0 $1,796,416 $4,873,922 Other Reserves: Product warranty $2,470,775 $3,018,990 $ 0 $3,125,060(2) $2,364,705 Schedule (II) - Page 1 A-24 ADDITIONS CHARGES TO BEGINNING COSTS & OTHER ENDING DESCRIPTION BALANCE EXPENSES ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE December 31, 1995: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,684,242 $ 533,136 $ 20,000(3)$ 958,740(1) $1,278,638 Reserve for inventory $4,994,035 $1,196,876 $ 0 $ 752,401 $5,438,510 Other Reserves: Product warranty $3,470,703 $3,194,240 $ 0 $4,194,168(2) $2,470,775 (1)Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. (2)Warranty costs charged to the reserve. (3)Represents reserve balances of subsidiaries acquired in the year. Schedule (VIII)(II) - Page 2 A-26A-25 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Astec Industries, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. BY: /s/ J. Don Brock BY: J. Don Brock, Chairman of the Board and President (Principal Executive Officer) BY: /s/ F. McKamy Hall F. McKamy Hall, Vice President, Corporate Controller, and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Date: March 14, 199712, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by a majority of the Board of Directors of the Registrant on the dates indicated: SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /s/ J. Don Brock Chairman of the Board March 14, 199712, 1998 J. Don Brock and President /s/ Albert E. Guth President, Astec Financial March 14, 199712, 1998 Albert E. Guth Services, Inc. and Director /s/ W. Norman Smith President - Astec, Inc. March 14, 199712, 1998 W. Norman Smith and Director /s/ Robert G. Stafford President - Telsmith, Inc. March 14, 199712, 1998 Robert G. Stafford and Director /s/ E. D.E.D. Sloan Jr. Director March 14, 1997 E. D.12, 1998 E.D. Sloan, Jr. /s/ William B. Sansom Director March 14, 199712, 1998 William B. Sansom /s/ Ronald W. Dunmire Director March 14, 199712, 1998 Ronald W. Dunmire /s/ George C. Dillon Director March 14, 199712, 1998 George C. Dillon /s/ G.W. Jones Director March 14, 199712, 1998 G.W. Jones /s/ Daniel K. FrierosnFrierson Director March 14, 199712, 1998 Daniel K. Frierson SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Astec Industries, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC./s/ Robert Dressler Director March 12, 1998 Robert Dressler Commission File No. 0-14714 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 EXHIBITS FILED WITH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 19961997 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. 4101 Jerome Avenue Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. FORM 10-K INDEX TO EXHIBITS Sequentially Exhibit Number Description Numbered Page Exhibit 10.100 Demand Note10.103 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 18, 1996November 27, 1997 between the Company, and the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Dr. J. Don Brock. Exhibit 10.101 Loan Agreement dated December 5, 1996 between Astec Financial Services, Inc. and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing,First Chicago NBD. Exhibit 10.104 Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 16, 1997 between Portec, Inc. ("CIT"). Exhibit 10.102and Astec Industries, Inc. GuarantyExhibit 10.105 Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 5, 1996 of2, 1997 by and between Astec Industries, Inc. and Portec, Inc. Exhibit 10.106 Revolving Line of Credit AgreementNote dated December 2, 1997 between Astec Financial Services,Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing,Astec Holdings, Inc. ("CIT"). Exhibit 11 Statement regarding computation10.107 Guaranty Joinder Agreement dated December, 1997 between Kolberg-Pioneer and Astec Holdings, Inc. in favor of per share earnings.the First National Bank of Chicago. Exhibit 22 Subsidiaries of the registrant. Exhibit 23 Consent of independent auditors. For a list of certain Exhibits not filed with this Report that are incorporated by reference into this Report, see Item 14(a)(3). EXHIBIT 10.100 Demand note dated March 18, 1996 between the Company and the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Dr. J. Don Brock. Exhibit 10.100 DEMAND NOTE Chattanooga, Tennessee $1,175,000 March 18, 1996 On demand the undersigned promises to pay to the order of J. DON BROCK the sum of ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,175,000.00), value received, with interest at a rate equal to 0.25% less than "prime rate" as charged from time to time by The First National Bank of Chicago. Accrued interest on the unpaid balance shall be paid on the first day of each month until this note is paid in full. If this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, by suit or otherwise, the undersigned will pay all costs of collection and litigation, together with a reasonable attorney's fee. The drawer and endorser hereof severally waive demand, protest and notice of nonpayment. It is further agreed that the right of recourse of the holder hereof against the endorser of this note shall not be impaired by any renewal, extension, modification or other indulgence which the holder may grant with respect to the indebtedness above mentioned, or any part thereof, although the same may be done without notice to or consent of such endorser. ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. By: /s/ Albert E. Guth Albert E. Guth Senior Vice President EXHIBIT 10.101 Loan Agreement dated December 5, 1996 between Astec Financial Services, Inc. and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. ("CIT") EXHIBIT 10.101 LOAN AGREEMENT LOAN AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") dated December 5, 1996 between Astec Financial Services, Inc. a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Tennessee (the "Company"), and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. ("CIT"). 1. LOAN ADVANCES CIT agrees subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, from time to time to make loans to the Company on a revolving basis in such amounts as may be mutually agreed upon, the maximum amount of such loans outstanding at any one time not to exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the amounts validly owing on "Eligible Receivables" (as hereinafter defined). 2. LOAN AMOUNT The aggregate loans made under this Agreement shall, in no event, exceed either the limitations set forth under Paragraph 1 hereof or the sum of $15,000,000.00 at any one time outstanding, unless CIT in its sole discretion shall agree to requests of the Company for loans in excess of said amounts. 3. INTEREST Interest shall be payable from the date hereof at the "Governing Rate", payable monthly on the average daily balance. The per annum rate is based on a year of 12 months of 30 days each computed on the basis of the average daily unpaid balance of principal outstanding during the preceding monthly period. As used herein, "monthly period" shall mean the period commencing on the first day of a calendar month and ending on the first day of the following calendar month, except that the first monthly period shall be payable within five days after your receipt of our statement therefore. As used herein the "Prime Rate" shall mean the rate publicly announced by The Chase Manhattan Bank from time to time as its Prime Rate. The Prime Rate of The Chase Manhattan Bank is not intended to be the lowest rate of interest charged by The Chase Manhattan Bank to its borrowers. The "commercial paper rate" means the average rate quoted by the Wall Street Journal, or such other sources as CIT may determine for 30-day dealer commercial paper. The "Wall Street Journal Prime Rate" shall mean the Prime Rate listed by The Wall Street Journal. If more than one Prime Rate is listed in The Wall Street Journal, then the highest rate shall apply. The "Governing Rate" shall mean a rate equal to the highest of: (i) the Prime Rate of The Chase Manhattan Bank or (ii) The Wall Street Journal Prime Rate or (iii) the commercial paper rate. In the event that the Governing Rate on the first day of any monthly period shall be more or less than the Governing Rate in effect on the date of this Agreement, the rate of interest on the loan during such monthly period shall be increased or decreased by a percentage per annum corresponding to the percentage per annum increase or decrease in the Governing Rate, but in no event, however, shall the rate of interest be more than that permitted by law. 4. LOAN ACCOUNTS; MONTHLY STATEMENTS All loans made hereunder shall be disbursed by CIT to Astec Financial Services, Inc., Chattanooga, Tn., and will be repayable at CIT's account at the CIT-Industrial Finance, File # 54224, Los Angeles, CA. 90074-4224, or such other bank of which we may hereafter advise you in writing and the Company promises to repay all such loans and all other "Obligations" (as hereinafter defined) to CIT in the manner set forth in this Agreement, without the necessity on CIT's part of resorting to or having recourse to any collateral. In addition to the monthly payment of interest by the Company to CIT pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 3 hereof, the outstanding principal amount of each loan shall be repaid to CIT upon the earlier of (i) thirteen months after the disbursement of its proceeds or (ii) the Anniversary Date of this Agreement. Loans measured by Eligible Receivables will be charged to one or more open accounts maintained in the Company's name on CIT's books (the "Loan Accounts"). In the event CIT should for any reason honor requests for advances in excess of the limitations set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2, such "overadvances" shall be made solely at CIT's option upon such additional terms as CIT shall determine, and shall be payable on demand. Each month CIT will render to the Company statements of the Loan Accounts, which the Company hereby agrees shall be deemed to be accounts stated and correct and acceptable to and binding on the Company unless CIT shall receive a written statement of exceptions from the Company within thirty (30) days after the monthly statements have been rendered to the Company. The Company will provide to CIT a borrowing base certificate for each loan request stating the amount of the request, current levels of funded accounts and the delinquencies thereunder. In the event CIT should so request, the Company agrees to also execute and deliver to CIT copies of such promissory notes of the Company as CIT shall request in order to evidence the loans, but unless and until CIT should so request, the borrowing base certificate and the Loan Accounts (and the monthly statements thereof rendered by CIT to the Company) shall constitute the primary evidence of the loans made hereunder. 5. DEFINITIONS (a) "Receivables" shall mean accounts, contract rights, chattel paper, notes, drafts, rental receivables, conditional sale contracts, security agreements, installment paper, installment sales, revolving charge accounts, and other obligations for the payment of money, including inter- company accounts and notes receivable, and all documents, contracts, invoices and instruments evidencing or constituting the same and all security instruments and security agreements relating thereto, which are created or acquired by the Company, all property the sale or lease of which gives rise or purports to give rise to Receivables, and all cash and non-cash proceeds thereof, including any merchandise returned or rejected by, or repossessed from, customers. (b) "Eligible Receivables" shall mean Receivables created or acquired by the Company in the regular course of its business as presently conducted. In general, no Receivable shall be deemed eligible unless: such Receivable represents an existing, valid and legally enforceable indebtedness based upon an actual and bona fide sale and delivery or lease of property or rendition of services to the named obligor, which has been finally accepted by the obligor and for which the obligor is unconditionally liable to make payment in the amount stated in each invoice, document or instrument evidencing, constituting or accompanying the Receivable in accordance with the terms thereof, without rights of rejection or return or offset, defense, counterclaim or claim of discount or dedication; all statements made and all unpaid balances appearing in the invoices, documents and instruments representing or constituting the Receivables, are true and correct and are in all respects what they purport to be, and all signatures and endorsements that appear thereon are genuine and all signatories and endorsers, if any, have full capacity to contract, and the obligor owing such Receivable is not affiliated with or employed by the Company; absolute title to each Receivable, free and clear of any liens and encumbrances or claims of others, including liens or encumbrances or claims of ownership on the property the sale or lease of which purports to give rise to such Receivable, is vested absolutely in the Company and no other assignment of or security interest or other interest in the Receivable in favor of others is then in effect; the transactions underlying or giving rise to any Receivable do not violate any applicable state or federal law or regulation and all documents relating to the Receivables are legally sufficient under such laws and regulations and are legally enforceable in accordance with their terms; and any contract under which any Receivable arises does not contain a prohibition against assignment or require the consent of or notice to the obligor with respect to any assignment of monies arising thereunder. (c) "Obligations" shall mean all loans and advances from time to time made by CIT to the Company hereunder and to others at the request of or for the account of or for the benefit of the Company, all other indebtedness and obligations which may be now or hereafter owing by the Company to CIT under this Agreement or any other agreement which may now or hereafter be entered into by CIT with the Company, howsoever arising, whether absolute or contingent, joint or several, matured or unmatured, direct or indirect, primary or secondary, including, but not limited to, CIT's interest or other charges hereunder or under any other agreement between the Company and CIT. The Company hereby agrees to pay on demand all costs and fees CIT may incur in the event of default by the Company hereunder, all costs and expenses (including, all out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees actually paid by CIT) incurred by CIT, its employees or agents in protecting, maintaining, preserving, enforcing or foreclosing CIT's security interest in any collateral, including all efforts made to enforce collection of any Receivable, whether through judicial proceedings or otherwise, or in defending or prosecuting any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to CIT's transactions with the Company, all of which are hereby also included in the definition of "Obligations" and which may be charged at CIT's option to the Loan Accounts in the event the same are not promptly paid after demand. (d) "Anniversary Date" shall mean the date occurring two years from the date hereof and the same date in every year thereafter. 6. GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST; COLLATERAL As security for the prompt payment in full of all present and future Obligations, the Company hereby grants to CIT a security interest in and hereby assigns and pledges to CIT, its successors and assigns, (which grant, assignment and pledge shall continue until payment in full of all Obligations, whether or not this Agreement shall have sooner terminated) all right, title and interest of the Company in and to the following (which, together with any other security at any time pledged, assigned or delivered by the Company to CIT or received by CIT in connection with any Obligations are herein sometimes collectively called "Collateral"): (a) All Receivables of the Company, whether or not the same be Eligible Receivables and whether or not specifically listed on any schedules, assignments or exports furnished to CIT from time to time, whether now existing or arising or created or acquired at any time hereafter, together with all rights to any and all sums due and to become due on Receivables, all proceeds of Receivables in whatever form, including cash, checks, notes, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money, and all right, title and interest in and to any merchandise the sale or lease of which gives rise to, or purports to create any Receivable or which secures any Receivable, all property allocable to unshipped orders and all merchandise returned by or reclaimed or repossessed from customers, all rights of stoppage in transit, replevin, repossession and reclamation and all other rights of any unpaid vendor or lienor. The continuing general assignment and pledge of and security interest in Receivables contained herein shall include all accounts, all documents, instruments, contracts, liens and security instruments, all credit insurance polices and other insurance and all guaranties relating to Receivables, all books and records evidencing, securing or relating to Receivables, all collateral, deposits, dealer reserves, or other security securing the obligations of any person under or relating to Receivables, all credit balances in favor of the Company on CIT's books, and all rights and remedies of whatever kind or nature the Company may hold or acquire for the purpose of securing or enforcing Receivables, and all general intangibles relating to or arising out of Receivables; (b) All general intangibles of the Company, now existing or hereafter arising or acquired, as such term is defined under the Uniform Commercial Code. 7. COLLECTION OF RECEIVABLES Until the Company's authority to do so is terminated by written notice from CIT, which notice CIT may give at any time after there has been a material adverse change in the Company's business or manner of operation or at any time after the occurrence of any "Event of Default" as specified below, the Company may continue to adjust all claims and disputes with obligors on Receivables and promptly collect and otherwise enforce all amounts owing on Receivables. Notwithstanding anything in the previous sentence to the contrary, all cash and non-cash proceeds of such sales or leases and all collections, including prepayments on Receivables, whether cash, other Receivables, checks, notes or other evidence of payment, and all documents and instruments relating thereto, are to be held in trust as CIT's property, and remitted to CIT in such manner and with such frequency as CIT shall determine. The Company shall notify CIT if any Receivable includes any tax due to any governmental taxing authority. If a Receivable includes a charge for any tax payable to any governmental taxing authority, CIT is authorized,in its discretion, to pay the amount thereof for the account of the Company and to charge the appropriate Loan Account therefor. 8. LOAN ACCOUNTS; CASH PROCEEDS, CHECKS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Any remittance received by the Company from customers shall be presumed to relate to the Collateral and shall be held in trust for and immediately delivered to CIT as set forth herein. Cash received with respect to the Collateral shall be credited to the appropriate Loan Account as of the same day such proceeds are received by CIT. Checks, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money shall be credited to the appropriate Loan Account the day following the day CIT's bank has made the proceeds of such instruments available as of right based on the bank's determination that the instrument has been finally paid. The excess of collections over the amount of Obligations owing to CIT hereunder may, at CIT's option, be paid by CIT from time to time to the Company, provided, however, that CIT may at any time in its discretion retain and apply such excess to any Obligations until all such Obligations have been paid in full. CIT shall have the right at all times to receive, receipt for, endorse, assign, deposit and deliver, in CIT's name or in the name of the Company, any and all checks, notes, drafts and other instruments for the payment of money constituting proceeds of or otherwise relating to the Collateral. The Company hereby authorizes CIT to affix, by facsimile signature or otherwise, the general or special endorsement of the Company, in such manner as CIT shall deem advisable, to any such instrument in the event the same has been delivered to CIT without appropriate endorsement, and CIT and any bank in which CIT may deposit any such instrument is hereby authorized to consider such endorsement to be a sufficient, valid and effective endorsement by the Company to the same extent as though it were manually executed by the duly authorized officer of the Company, regardless of by whom or under what circumstances or by what authority such facsimile signature or other endorsement is actually affixed, without duty of inquiry or responsibility as to such matters, and the Company and each guarantor and endorser of the Company's Obligations hereby waives demand, presentment, protest and notice of protest or dishonor and all other notices of every kind and nature with respect to any such instruments. 9. COMPANY BOOKS AND RECORDS CIT shall have the right at any time and from time to time to request from obligors indebted on Receivables, in the name of the Company or in the name of CIT's accountants, information concerning the Receivables and the amounts owing thereon. The Company agrees to maintain books and records pertaining to the Collateral in such detail, form and scope as CIT shall require, and to promptly notify CIT of any changes of name or address of the Company or of the legal entity of the Company or of the corporate structure of the Company and its subsidiaries or of the location of the Collateral. All records, computer tapes, discs and other data storage devices, ledger sheets, correspondence, invoices, delivery receipts, documents and instruments relating to the Collateral shall, unless and until delivered to CIT, be kept by the Company, without cost to CIT, in appropriate containers and in safe places, and if CIT should so request, shall bear suitable legends identifying them as being under CIT's dominion and control. CIT shall at all reasonable times have full access to and the right to audit any and all of the Company's books, computer tapes, discs and other data storage devices and records, including, but not limited to, books and records pertaining to the Collateral and including all files and correspondence with creditors and customers, and to confirm and verify the amounts owing on Receivables and the value and collectibility of other Collateral and to do whatever else CIT reasonably may deem necessary to protect its interest. 10. REPORTS; ASSIGNMENTS OF RECEIVABLES In furtherance of the continuing assignment and security interest herein contained, the Company will execute and make available to CIT from time to time in such form and manner and with such frequency as may be required by CIT, solely for CIT's convenience in maintaining a record of the Collateral, such confirmatory assignments of Receivables, designating, identifying or describing the Collateral and copies of invoices to customers, agreements of any kind with its customers, copies of suppliers' invoices, evidence of shipment and delivery and such further documentation and information relating to the Collateral as CIT may require, provided,however, that if the Company should fail to execute and deliver such reports or assignments, such failure shall not affect, diminish, modify or otherwise limit CIT's security interest in all present and future Inventory and Receivables of the Company and the proceeds thereof. The Company agrees to advise CIT promptly of any substantial change relating to the type, quantity or quality of Collateral or of any event which would have a material effect on the value of the Collateral or on the security interested granted to CIT therein. 1l. INSURANCE AND RISK OF LOSS All risk of loss, damage to or destruction of the Collateral shall at all times be on the Company. The Company agrees to maintain in full force and effect at the Company's expense, policies of insurance covering all the Collateral with such insurance companies, in such amounts and covering such risks as are at all times satisfactory to CIT. Copies of certificates are to be made available to CIT on or prior to the date of disbursement of loans. 12. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company agrees to furnish to CIT such information regarding the business affairs and financial condition of the Company, its parent, and its subsidiaries, if any, as CIT shall from time to time reasonably request, including, but not limited to, financial statements of the Company, its parent and such subsidiaries in such scope and detail and furnished with such frequency as CIT shall determine and certified by such independent certified public accountants as shall be satisfactory to CIT, including, but not by way of limitation, the financial statements referred to in Paragraph 25 hereof. 13. TAXES; USE The Company agrees that it will, and will cause each of the Company's subsidiaries, if any, to pay and discharge all taxes, assessments, licensing obligations and governmental charges or levies imposed on the income, profits, sale, business or properties of the Company or its subsidiaries prior to the date upon which penalties attach for non-payment thereof, and promptly discharge any liens, encumbrances or other claims which may be levied or claimed against any of the Collateral, provided that any such tax, assessment, charge or levy need not be paid if the payment thereof is being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate book reserves, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, shall be set aside, and if any such tax, assessment, charge or levy lawfully imposed shall remain unpaid after the date upon which a lien on any collateral arises or may be imposed as a result of such non- payment, or if any lien is claimed for any other reason against any of the Collateral, which if foreclosed would in CIT's opinion adversely affect the value of CIT's security interest in any of the Collateral, CIT may pay and discharge such taxes, assessments, charges, levies and liens, and the amount so paid by CIT shall be payable on demand and if not paid promptly, will be charged to the appropriate Loan Account and shall be secured by the Collateral. The Company agrees to comply and to cause its subsidiaries to comply with all laws and all acts, rules, regulations and orders of any legislative, administrative or judicial body or official, applicable to the Collateral or to the operation of the business of the Company or its subsidiaries. 14. TITLE TO COLLATERAL; INSPECTION The Company represents, warrants and agrees to take all steps and observe such formalities as CIT may request from time to time in order to create, perfect and maintain in CIT's favor a valid first lien upon and security interest in the Collateral, including the filing or recording of any financing statements or similar instruments which CIT deems necessary or appropriate, and to defend at its expense, Receivables and other Collateral from all liens, security interests, encumbrances, claims and demands of all other persons. The Company hereby further agrees that CIT may enter upon the Company's premises at any time and from time to time to inspect the Collateral. 15. DEFAULT The following shall constitute an "Event of Default" under this Agreement: (a) the Company or any of its subsidiaries fails to pay any Obligation as defined herein within fifteen (15) days of the due date thereof, by acceleration or otherwise; (b) there is a breach in the performance of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, as at any time amended, or of any of the terms or provisions of any other agreement between CIT and the Company or any of its subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, and any guaranty agreement under which any Obligation is guaranteed to CIT, or under any agreement between CIT and any other party with respect to CIT's transactions with the Company or with respect to any Obligations or the Collateral therefor, whether such agreements are now existing or are hereafter entered into, provided that such breach by the Company of any of the terms, provisions, warranties, representations or covenants referred to in this paragraph shall not be deemed an Event of Default unless and until such breach shall remain unremedied to CIT's satisfaction for a period of fifteen (15) days from the date at such breach, (c) any representation, covenant or warranty made by the Company in connection with this Agreement is breached; (d) any statement or data furnished by or for the Company relating to the Collateral or to the operations, financial condition or business affairs of the Company, or its subsidiaries, and any guarantor proves to be false in any material respect; (e) the Company fails to maintain any of the loans-to-collateral ratios specified in this Agreement or in any amendment or modification hereof; (f) the Company, any of its subsidiaries, or any guarantor becomes insolvent or unable to meet its debts as they mature, suspends operations as presently conducted, discontinues business as a going concern, or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; (g) a meeting of creditors is called by or for the Company, any of its subsidiaries, or any guarantor; (h) there is filed by or against the Company, any of its subsidiaries or any guarantor a petition under any of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, as at any time amended, or any proceedings are commenced by or against the Company, any of its subsidiaries, or any guarantor under any insolvency law, or a receiver or trustee is appointed to administer the assets or affairs of the Company, or any guarantor of its subsidiaries; (i) a judgment is entered or an attachment is levied against the assets of the Company, any of its subsidiaries or any guarantor which, in the judgment of CIT, will adversely affect the Company's ability to perform this Agreement or impair the enforceability of CIT's security interest in the Collateral; (j) CIT, in the good faith belief that the prospect for payment or performance by the Company is impaired, or deems itself or any of the Collateral to be insecure; or (k) any indebtedness to others owing by the Company, any of its subsidiaries or any guarantor is accelerated because of a default under any note or agreement relating thereto. 16. REMEDIES Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, all Obligations shall, at CIT's option, immediately become due and payable, anything in any note evidencing any such Obligation or in this Agreement or in any other agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, without notice to the Company, and CIT shall have in any jurisdiction where enforcement hereof is sought, in addition to all other rights and remedies which CIT may have under law and at equity, the following rights and remedies, all of which may be exercised with or without further notice to the Company: (a) to notify any and all obligors on Receivables that the same have been assigned to CIT and that all payments thereon are to be made directly to CIT; (b) to settle, compromise, or release, on terms acceptable to CIT, in whole or in part, any amounts owing on Receivables; (c) to enforce payment and prosecute any action or proceeding with respect to any and all Receivables, to extend the time of payment, make allowances and adjustments and to issue credits in CIT's name or in the name of the Company; (d) to foreclose the liens and security interests created under this Agreement or under any other agreement relating to the Collateral by any available judicial procedure or without judicial process, to enter any premises where any of the Collateral may be located for the purpose of taking possession or removing the same; and (e) to sell, assign, lease or otherwise dispose of the Collateral or any part thereof, either at public or private sale or at any broker's board, in lots or in bulk, for cash, on credit or otherwise, with or without representations or warranties, and upon such terms as shall be acceptable to CIT, all at CIT's sole option and as CIT in its sole discretion may deem advisable, and CIT may bid or become a purchaser at any such sale if public, free from any right of redemption which is hereby expressly waived by the Company, and CIT shall have the right at its option to apply or be credited with the amount of all or any part of the Obligations owing to CIT against the purchase price bid by CIT at any such sale. The net cash proceeds resulting from the collection, liquidation, sale, lease or other disposition of the Collateral shall be applied first, to the expenses (including all attorneys' fees) of retaking, holding, storing, processing and preparing for sale, selling, collecting, liquidating and the like, and then to the satisfaction of all Obligations, application as to particular Obligations or against principal or interest to be in CIT's absolute discretion. The Company shall be liable to CIT and shall pay to CIT on demand any deficiency which may remain after such sale, disposition, collection or liquidation of the Collateral, and CIT in turn agrees to remit to the Company any surplus remaining after all Obligations have been paid in full. If any of the Collateral shall require repairing, maintenance, preparation, or the like, or is in process or other unfinished state, CIT shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to do such repairing, maintenance, preparation, processing or completion of manufacturing for the purpose of putting the same in such saleable form as CIT shall deem appropriate, but CIT shall have the right to sell or dispose of such Collateral without such processing. The Company will, at CIT's request, assemble the Collateral and make it available to CIT at places which CIT may select, whether at the premises of the Company or elsewhere, and will make available to CIT all premises and facilities of the Company for the purpose of CIT's taking possession of the Collateral or of removing or putting the Collateral in saleable form. In the event any goods called for in any sales order, contract, invoice or other instrument or agreement evidencing or purporting to give rise to any Receivable included in any assignment submitted to CIT for collateral purposes shall not have been delivered or shall be claimed to be defective by any customer, CIT shall have the right in its discretion to use and deliver to such customer any goods of the Company to fulfill such order, contract or the like so as to make good any such Receivable. The enumeration of CIT's rights and remedies set forth in this Agreement is not intended to be exhaustive and the exercise by CIT of any right or remedy shall not preclude the exercise of any other rights or remedies, all of which shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to any other rights or remedy given hereunder or under any other agreement between the parties or which may now or hereafter exist in law or at equity or by suit or otherwise. To facilitate the exercise by CIT of the rights and remedies set forth in this Paragraph, the Company hereby constitutes CIT or its agents, or any other person whom CIT may designate, as attorney-in-fact for the Company, at the Company's own cost and expense, to exercise all or any of the following powers, which being coupled with an interest, shall be irrevocable, shall continue until all Obligations have been paid in full and shall be in addition to any other rights and remedies that CIT may have: (i) to remove from any premises where the same may be located, any and all documents, instruments, files and records, and any receptacles and cabinets containing the same, relating to the Collateral, and CIT may at the Company's cost and expense, use such of the personnel, supplies and space of the Company at its places of business as may be necessary to properly administer and control the Collateral or the handling of collections and realizations thereon; (ii) to receive, open and dispose of all mail addressed to the Company and to notify postal authorities to change the address for delivery thereof to such address as CIT may designate; and (iii) to take or bring, in CIT's name or in the name of the Company, all steps, actions, suits or proceedings deemed by CIT necessary or desirable to effect the collection of or to realize upon the Collateral. CIT shall not, under any circumstances or in any event whatsoever, have any liability for any error or omission or delay of any kind occurring in the liquidation of the Collateral including the settlement, collection or payment of any Receivable or any instrument received in payment thereof, or for any damage resulting therefrom. 17. CROSS SECURITY It is understood and agreed that all of the collateral which CIT may at any time acquire from the Company or from any other source in connection with the Obligations of the Company to CIT, shall constitute collateral for each and every Obligation, without apportionment or designation as to particular Obligations, and that all Obligations, howsoever and whensoever incurred, shall be secured by all collateral howsoever and whensoever acquired, and that CIT shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to determine the order in which CIT's rights in or remedies against any collateral are to be exercised and which type of collateral or which portions of collateral are to be proceeded against and the order of application of proceeds of collateral as against particular Obligations. Notwithstanding anything which may be contained in any of the Receivables assigned to CIT hereunder, upon execution of this Agreement the Company agrees not to make any claims, or take any action against the property covered by the Receivables or to attempt to accelerate any of the Obligations due thereunder. 18. EFFECT OF WAIVER No delay on the part of CIT in exercising any right, power or privilege shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege preclude other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege or shall be construed to be a waiver of any event of default. No course of dealing between the Company and CIT or its agents or employees shall be effective to change, modify or discharge any provision of this Agreement or to constitute a waiver of any default. 19. SEVERABILITY Any provision of this Agreement which is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. 20. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT CIT's obligation to make any loan hereunder at any time is subject to compliance in full by the Company with all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, as at any time amended, and to the further condition that at the time of the proposed making of any such loan there shall have been no material adverse change in the financial condition or business of the Company, its subsidiaries, and any guarantor and that no event of default, as defined herein and no event which with the lapse of time or the notice and lapse of time specified for the purpose of constituting such an event of default has occurred and is continuing at the time of such proposed loan. 21. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY The Company represents, covenants and warrants to CIT that the Company is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of incorporation mentioned in the introductory Paragraph of this Agreement, and that the Company and its subsidiaries are duly qualified as foreign corporations to do business in every other state where the nature of the business of the Company or its subsidiaries requires such qualification, and that the Company and its subsidiaries are duly licensed to transact business under all applicable laws; that the Company and its subsidiaries have good and marketable title to all properties and assets, whether real or personal, shown on the latest balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries furnished to CIT before the execution of this Agreement, subject to no mortgage, pledge, lien or encumbrance except as are shown on said balance sheets and except for current taxes not now in default, and since the date of the latest of such balance sheets there has been no material adverse change in the condition, financial or otherwise, of the Company or its subsidiaries from that shown on said balance sheets; that the Company and its subsidiaries have no liabilities or obligations of any nature, whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise, due or to become due, except for taxes not now in default and except for operating expenses in the ordinary course of business, other than as reflected or reserved against in said balance sheets, and the Company and its subsidiaries have no liability for federal income or excess profits taxes or other than as shown on said balance sheets and except for taxes relating to operations since the date of said balance sheets and no federal tax deficiency assessment has been made or threatened against the Company or any of its subsidiaries and there is no pending claim of deficiency or recommendation of the assessment of any deficiency against the Company or any of its subsidiaries; that the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the full performance thereof by the Company and the granting of security to CIT as contemplated hereunder do not and will not violate any provisions of any of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, Charter or By-Laws or any indenture or mortgage or other agreement to which the Company is a party or is bound; and that all collateral subject to the security interest in favor of CIT pursuant to this Agreement at the time of execution hereof is owned by the Company free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and claims in favor of others. 22. EFFECTIVENESS OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall become effective only upon the written acceptance hereof by CIT. 23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; SUCCESSORS When so accepted, this Agreement shall supersede all previous verbal or written agreements, commitments or understandings relating to CIT's loans to the Company and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the Company and of CIT. 24. RECORDING FEES CIT shall issue a statement to the Company indicating the cost of recording taxes and the Company shall pay the statement within 20 days therein. 25. ASSIGNMENT The Company may not assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of CIT. 26. ADDITIONAL AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY As long as any Obligations remain outstanding hereunder, the Company, in addition to the covenants made elsewhere in this Agreement, hereby covenants that, unless CIT shall otherwise consent in writing, (i) it shall maintain at each fiscal year end a tangible net worth of at least $3,500,000.00 for the first year of this Agreement, and (ii) Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Guarantor") shall: (a) Net Worth: Maintain at each fiscal year end a tangible net worth of at least $50,000,000.00 (b) Current Ratio: Maintain at each fiscal year end a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of at least 1.5 to 1. (c) Additional Reporting Requirements: Furnish CIT: (i) Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the end of each fiscal year of the Guarantor a balance sheet and statements of income and surplus, together with supporting schedules, all certified by independent certified public accountants of recognized standing selected by the Guarantor and acceptable to CIT showing the financial condition of the Guarantor at the close of such year and the results of operations of the Guarantor during such year, and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices consistently applied; (ii) Within forty-five (45) days after the end of each quarter, similar financial statements similar to those referred to in subparagraph (i) above, each set of respective statements, all unaudited, but certified by the principal financial officer of the Company, such balance sheets to be as of the end of such month and such statements of income and surplus to be for the period from the beginning of the fiscal year to the end of such month, in each case subject to audit and year-end adjustments, and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices consistently applied; (iii) Promptly, from time to time, such other information regarding the operations, business affairs and financial condition of the Company as CIT may reasonably request including, but not limited to, all business plans prepared by, or at the request of, the Company, annually during the term of this Agreement. (d) Dividends: The Company will not declare or pay any dividend (other than a dividend payable in stock of the Company) or authorize or make any other distribution on any stock of the Company, whether now or hereafter outstanding or make any payment on account of the purchase, acquisition, redemption or other retirement of any shares of such stock which would exceed in any fiscal year fifty percent (50%) of the after tax net profit of the Company for such fiscal year. (e) Debt to Worth Ratio: The ratio of the Company's total liabilities to tangible net worth at each fiscal year end shall not exceed .9 to 1. (f) Changes in Company: The Company will not, without CIT's prior written substantial portion of its assets; or (c) change its name or the form of organization of its business; or (d) sell, cause to have sold or permit or suffer the sale of any shares of consent, (a) liquidate or dissolve; or (b) sell or otherwise dispose of all or any voting stock of the Company to any person or entity than the Guarantor. (g) Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio: The Company's fiscal year end ratio of pre-tax income excluding non-recurring gains and losses divided by the sum of: (i) interest expense, plus, (ii) amortization of debt discount and related expenses, plus (iii) payments of principal and indebtedness shall be at least 2.5 to 1. 27. NOTICES Any notice or request required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be sufficient if in writing and sent by hand or by Certified Mail, in either case return receipt requested, to the parties at the following addresses: The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. Astec Financial Services, Inc. 1620 West Fountainhead Parkway 6400 Lee Highway Suite 620 Suite 107 Tempe, AZ 85282 Chattanooga, TN. 37421 28. TERMINATION Except as otherwise permitted herein, the Company or CIT may terminate this Agreement only as of the date two years from the date hereof or any subsequent Anniversary Date and then only by giving the other at least sixty (60) days prior written notice of termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing CIT may terminate this Agreement immediately upon the occurrence of an Event of Default. This Agreement, unless terminated as herein provided, shall automatically continue from Anniversary Date to Anniversary Date. All Obligations shall become due and payable as of any termination hereunder and, pending a final accounting, may withhold any balances in the Company's account (unless supplied with an indemnity satisfactory to CIT) to cover all of the Company's Obligations, whether absolute or contingent. All of CIT's rights, liens and security interests shall continue after any termination until all Obligations have been paid and satisfied in full. 29. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws applicable to contracts made or performed in the State of Tennessee, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and CIT have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers duly authorized thereto. THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. FINANCING, INC. By: CIT Group Name: CIT Group ASTEC FINANCIAL By: /S/ Albert E. Guth Name: Albert E. Guth Title: President, Astec Financial Services, Inc. EXHIBIT 10.102 Astec Industries, Inc. Guaranty dated December 5, 1996 of Line-of-Credit Agreement between Astec Financial Services, Inc. and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. Exhibit 10.102 Guaranty To: The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. P.O. Box 27248 Tempe, AZ 85285-7248 Each of us severally requests you to extend credit to or purchase security agreements, leases, notes, accounts and/or other obligations (herein generally termed "paper") of or from or otherwise to do business with Astec Financial Services, Inc., Chattanooga, TN hereinafter called the "Company", and to induce you so to do and in considerations thereof and of benefits to accrue to each of us therefrom, each of us, as a primary obligor, jointly and severally and unconditionally guarantees to you that the Company will fully and promptly pay and perform all its present and future obligations to you, whether direct or indirect, joint or several, absolute or contingent, secured or unsecured, matured or unmatured and whether originally contracted with you or otherwise acquired by you, irrespective of any invalidity or unenforceability of any such obligation or the insufficiency, invalidity or unenforceability of any security therefor; and agrees without your first having to proceed against the Company or to liquidate paper or any security therefor, to pay on demand all sums due and to become due to you from the Company and all losses, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which may be suffered by you by reason of the Company's default or default of any of the undersigned hereunder; and agrees to be bound by and on demand to pay any deficiency established by a sale of paper and/or security held, with or without notice to us. This guaranty is an unconditional guarantee of payment and performance. No guarantor shall be released or discharged, either in whole or in part, by your failure or delay to perfect or continue the perfection of any security interest in any property which secures the obligations of the Company or any of us to you, or to protect the property covered by such security interest. No termination hereof shall be effected by the death of any or all of us. No termination shall be effective except b notice sent to you by certified mail return receipt requested naming a termination date effective not less and 90 days after the receipt of such notice by you; or effective as to any of us who has not given such notice; or affect any transaction effected prior to the effective date of termination. Each of us waives: notice of acceptance hereof; presentment, demand, protest and notice of nonpayment of protest as to any note or obligation signed, accepted, endorsed or assigned to you by the Company; any and all rights of sub rogation, reimbursement, indemnity, exoneration, contribution or any other claim which any of us may now or hereafter have against the Company or any other person directly or contingently liable for the obligations guaranteed hereunder, or against or with respect to the Company's property (including, without limitation, property collateralizing its obligations to you), arising from the existence or performance of these guaranty; all exemptions and homestead laws and any other demands and notices required by law; all rights and defenses arising out of ( i ) an election of remedies by you even though that election of remedies may have destroyed rights of subrogation and reimbursement against the Company by operation of law or otherwise, ( ii ) protections afforded to the Company pursuant to antideficiency or similar laws limiting or discharging the Company's obligations to you, ( iii ) the invalidity or unenforceability of this guaranty, (iv) the failure to notify any of us of the disposition of any property securing the obligations of the Company, (v) the commercial reasonableness of such disposition or the impairment, however caused, of the value of such property, and (vi) any duty on your part (should such duty exist) of the Company or its affiliates or property, whether now or hereafter known by you. You may at any time and from time to time, without our consent, without notice to us and without affecting or impairing the obligation of any of us hereunder, do any of the following: (a) renew, extend (including extensions beyond the original term of the respective item of paper), modify (including changes in interest rates), release or discharge any obligations of the Company, of its customers, of co-guarantors (whether hereunder or under a separate instrument) or of any other party at any time directly or contingently liable for the payment of any of said obligations; (b) accept partial payments of said obligations; (c) accept new or additional documents, instruments or agreements relating to or in substitution of said obligations; (d) settle, release ( by operation of law or otherwise), compound, compromise, collect or liquidate any of said obligations and the security therefor in any manner; (e) consent to the transfer or return of the security, take and hold additional security or guaranties for said obligations; (f) amend, exchange, release or waive any security or guaranty ; or (g) bid and purchase at any sale of paper or security and apply any proceeds or security, and direct the order and manner or sale. If a claim is made upon you at any time for repayment or recovery of any amount(s) or other value received by you, form any source, in payment of or on account of any of the obligations of the Company guaranteed hereunder and you repay or otherwise become liable for all or any part of such claim by reason of; (a) any judgment, decree or order of any court or administrative body having competent jurisdiction; or (b) any settlement or compromise of any such claim, we shall remain jointly and severally liable to you hereunder for the amount so repaid r for which you are otherwise liable to the same extent as if such amount(s) had never been received by you, notwithstanding any termination hereof or the cancellation of any note or other agreement evidencing any of the obligations of the Company. This guaranty shall bind our respective heirs, administrators, representatives, successors, and assigns, and shall incur to your successors and assigns, including, but no limited to, any party to whom you may assign any item or items of paper, we hereby waiving notice of any such assignment. All of your rights are cumulative and not alternative. By execution of this guaranty each guarantor hereunder agrees to waive all rights to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, or counterclaim or any matter whatsoever arising out of, in connection with, or related to this guaranty. Executed December 5, 1996. Guarantors Astec Industries, Inc. Chattanooga TN 37407 By: J. Don Brock, President Corporate Seal Attest: Sam M. Sprouse EXHIBIT 11 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. EXHIBIT (11) - COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (In Thousands) 12-31-96 12-31-95 12-31-94 Shares for Earnings Per Share Computations Primary: Weighted average outstanding during year 10,047 10,072 9,844 Common Stock equivalent for stock options & warrants 111 124 141 TOTAL 10,158 10,196 9,985 Fully Diluted: Weighted average outstanding during year 10,047 10,072 9,844 Common Stock equivalent for stock options & warrants 112 125 146 TOTAL 10,159 10,197 9,990 Earnings Applicable to Common Stock: Income from continuing operations $ 4,345 $4,560 $23,426 Net Income $ 4,345 $4,560 $23,436 Earnings Per Common Share (Based on Weighted Average Number of Common and Uncommon Equivalent Shares Outstanding): Income from continuing operations $ .43 $ .45 $ 2.38 Net Income $ .43 $ .45 $ 2.38 Additional Computations of EPS: Fully Diluted: Income from continuing operations $ .43 $ .45 $ 2.38 Net Income $ .43 $ .45 $ 2.38 EXHIBIT 22 Subsidiaries of the Registrant LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES Jurisdiction of Name Owned Incorporation Astec, Inc. 100 Tennessee Astec Financial Services, Inc. 100 Tennessee Astec Holdings, Inc. 100 Tennessee Astec Transportation, Inc. 100 Tennessee CEI Enterprises, Inc. 100 Tennessee Heatec, Inc. 100 Tennessee Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. 100 Tennessee Roadtec, Inc. 100 Tennessee Telsmith, Inc. 100 Delaware Trencor, Inc. 100 Texas Production Engineered Products, Inc. 100 Nevada Pavement Technology, Inc. 50 Georgia EXHIBIT 23 Consent of Independent Auditors CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-14738 and 0-14714) pertaining to the Astec Industries, Inc. 1986 and 1992 Stock Option Plans of our report dated February 21, 1997,20, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Astec Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996. /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP1997. ERNST & YOUNG LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee March 14, 199719, 1998