Washington, D.C. 20549
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ☒ | | Accelerated filer | X☐ | |
|
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | |
Smaller reporting company | ☐ | |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | | Emerging growth company | ☐ | |
| If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. q |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
As of June 30, 2017,2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant's common shares (its only class of common equity) held by non-affiliates (24,487,187(27,929,414 shares) was approximately $699.1$961.9 million. The number of common shares of the registrant outstanding as of February 14, 201817, 2021 was 27,869,964.29,109,685.
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | | PAGE NUMBER |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
PART I
Special Note of Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information included in this report or in other materials we have filed or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us) contains or may contain forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding our future financial performance and financial condition. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “envisions,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. TheseForward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements that we make herein and in future reports and statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements as a result of various risk factors. Please seeSee “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding those risk factors.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be consulted. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and all of our forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referenced in this section.
Item 1. BUSINESS
General
M/I Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is one of the nation’s leading builders of single-family homes. The Company was incorporated, through predecessor entities, in 1973 and commenced homebuilding activities in 1976. Since that time, the Company has sold over 105,600127,650 homes. Unless this Form 10-K otherwise indicates or the context otherwise requires, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to M/I Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The Company consists of two distinct operations: homebuilding and financial services. Our homebuilding operations are aggregated for reporting purposes into threetwo reporting segments - the Midwest, Mid-AtlanticNorthern and Southern regions. Our financial services operations support our homebuilding operations by providing mortgage loans and title services to the customers of our homebuilding operations and are reported as an independent segment. Please see Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the financial and operating results for each of our reporting segments. Our homebuilding operations comprise the most significant portion of our business, representing 97% of consolidated revenue in 20172020 and 98% in 2016.2019. We design, market, construct and sell single-family homes and attached townhomes to first-time, move-up, empty-nester, and luxury buyers. In addition to home sales, our homebuilding operations generate revenue from the sale of land and lots. We use the term “home” to refer to a single-family residence, whether it is a single-family home or other type of residential property, and weattached home. We use the term “community” to refer to a single development in which we construct homes.homes, or, at times, “multiple communities” can exist in a single development where we offer multiple product types. We primarily construct homes in planned development communities and mixed-use communities. We are currently offering homes for sale in 188202 communities within 15 markets located in nineten states. Our average sales price of homes delivered during 20172020 was $369,000,$381,000, and the average sales price of our homes in backlog at December 31, 20172020 was $393,000.$419,000. We offer homes ranging from a base sales price of approximately $170,000$200,000 to $1,400,000$1,045,000 and believe that this range of price points allows us to appeal to and attract a wide range of buyers. We further believe that we distinguish ourselves from competitors by offering homes in select areas with a high level of design and construction quality, within a given price range, providing superior customer service and offering mortgage and title services in order to fully serve our customers. In our experience, our product offerings and customer service make the homebuying process more efficient for our customers.
Our financial services operations generate revenue primarily from originating and selling mortgages and collecting fees for title insurance and closing services. We offer mortgage banking services to our homebuyers through our 100%-owned subsidiary, M/I Financial, LLC (“M/I Financial”). We offer title services through subsidiaries that are either 100% or majority owned-owned by the Company. Our financial services operations accounted for 3% of our consolidated revenues in 20172020 and 2% in 2016.2019. See the “Financial Services” section below for additional information regarding our financial services operations.
Our principal executive offices are located at 3 Easton Oval,4131 Worth Avenue, Suite 500, Columbus, Ohio 43219. The telephone number of our corporate headquarters is (614) 418-8000 and our website address is www.mihomes.com. Information on our website is not a part of and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.
Markets
For reporting purposes, our 15 homebuilding divisions are aggregated into the following threetwo segments:
| | | | | | | | |
Region | Market/Division | Year Operations Commenced |
Northern | Columbus, Ohio | 1976 |
Northern | Cincinnati, Ohio | 1988 |
Northern | Indianapolis, Indiana | 1988 |
Northern | Chicago, Illinois | 2007 |
Northern | Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota | 2015 |
Northern | Detroit, Michigan | 2018 |
Southern | Tampa, Florida | 1981 |
Southern | Orlando, Florida | 1984 |
Southern | Sarasota, Florida | 2016 |
Southern | Charlotte, North Carolina | 1985 |
Southern | Raleigh, North Carolina | 1986 |
Southern | Houston, Texas | 2010 |
Southern | San Antonio, Texas | 2011 |
Southern | Austin, Texas | 2012 |
Southern | Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas | 2013 |
| | |
Region | Market/Division | Year Operations Commenced |
Midwest | Columbus, Ohio | 1976 |
Midwest | Cincinnati, Ohio | 1988 |
Midwest | Indianapolis, Indiana | 1988 |
Midwest | Chicago, Illinois | 2007 |
Midwest | Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota | 2015 |
Southern | Tampa, Florida | 1981 |
Southern | Orlando, Florida | 1984 |
Southern | Sarasota, Florida | 2016 |
Southern | Houston, Texas | 2010 |
Southern | San Antonio, Texas | 2011 |
Southern | Austin, Texas | 2012 |
Southern | Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas | 2013 |
Mid-Atlantic | Charlotte, North Carolina | 1985 |
Mid-Atlantic | Raleigh, North Carolina | 1986 |
Mid-Atlantic | Washington, D.C. | 1991 |
We believe we have experienced management teams in each of our divisions with local market expertise. Our business requires in-depth knowledge of local markets to acquire land in desirable locations and on favorable terms, engage subcontractors, plan communities that meet local demand, anticipate consumer tastes in specific markets, and assess local regulatory environments. Although we centralize certain functions (such as accounting, human resources, legal, land purchase approval, and risk management) to benefit from economies of scale, our local management, generally under the direction of an Area President and supervised by a Region President, exercises considerable autonomy in identifying land acquisition opportunities, developing and implementing product and sales strategies, and controlling costs.
Industry Overview and Current Market Conditions
Housing market conditions were generally favorableFollowing a substantial decline in 2017 as demand for new homes improved, reflecting positive underlying demographic and economic trends, including low interest rates and improved consumer confidence, higher employment levels in most of our markets and modest wage growth. Despite increases in short-term interest rates initiated by the Federal Reserve during 2017, and further increases by the Federal Reserve anticipated in 2018, we expect continued modest improvementcontracts in the overall housing market in 2018 driven by the economic factors cited above, as well as accelerating household formation, improving costslatter half of ownership compared with rental costs,March and attractive home affordability relative to income levels. We also expect the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) to have a positive impact on our businessApril as a result of higher net income levelsthe COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced a sharp recovery and an increase in sales activity commencing in May as pandemic-related restrictions began to ease. This trend of increasing sales volume continued through our third and fourth quarters, resulting in the Company achieving a record for some prospective home buyersnew contracts in 2020, along with records in a number of other operating and financial metrics. We believe that the homebuilding industry benefited from record-low interest rates, a continued undersupply of available homes and a generally stimulative effect on job creationdesire of many consumers to move from rental apartments and the U.S. economy.
Accordingdensely populated areas to single family homes in suburban locations. We believe these factors will continue to support demand into 2021, subject to the U.S. Census Bureau, new homeeconomic uncertainties caused by the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. Company-wide, our absorption pace of sales per community in 2020 improved to 3.7 per month compared to 2.6 per month in 2019. Our average sales price in backlog increased in 2017 with 625,0002020 by 6%. Partially as a result of this accelerated sales pace, we sold out of some communities earlier and our number of active communities declined to 202 at the end of 2020 from 225 at the end of 2019. We continued to place additional land under contract for communities that will be brought online in future periods, and controlled approximately 39,500 lots at December 31, 2020. Our ability to timely replace existing communities could further impact our number of active communities. We continue to work to open new homes sold in the United States compared to 563,000 sold in 2016 and 501,000 sold in 2015,communities, and we expect new homeare also actively managing sales pace, in part by selectively increasing prices, to continue to increase in 2018. The numberbetter match our availability of housing permits issued in the United States also increased to an estimated 1,192,000 in 2017 compared to 1,187,000 in 2016lots and 1,178,000 in 2015.production schedule.
Business Strategy
We believe that we are well-positionedremain focused on increasing our profitability by generating additional revenue, continuing to achieve further growthexpand our market share, shifting our product mix to include more affordable designs, and investing in 2018 as a result of our plansattractive land opportunities to increase our
number of average active communities and our competitive position in our markets.communities. Consistent with our focus on improving long-term financial results, we expect to continue to emphasize the following strategic business objectives in 2018:2021:
profitably growing•managing our presence in our existing markets, includingland spend and inventory levels;
•accelerating the opening of new communities;communities wherever possible;
•maintaining a strong balance sheet;sheet and liquidity levels;
•expanding the availability of our more affordable Smart Series homes; and
•emphasizing customer service, product quality and design, and premier locations; andlocations.
reviewing new markets for additional expansion opportunities.
However, we can provide no assurance that the positive trends reflected in our financial and operating metrics in 20162019 and 20172020 will continue in 2018.
2021, especially given the uncertainties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the timing and extent of the associated decline in economic activity and subsequent recovery.
Sales and Marketing
During 2017,2020, we continued to focus our marketing efforts on first-time and move-up homebuyers, including home designs targeted to first-time, millennial and empty-nester homebuyers. We market and sell our homes primarily under the M/I Homes and Showcase Collection (exclusively by M/I Homes) brands. Following our acquisition of a privately-held homebuilder in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market in December 2015, we use the Hans Hagen brand in that market.brand. Our marketing efforts are directed at driving interest in and preference for the M/I Homes brandsbrand over other homebuilders or the resale market.
We provide our homebuyers with the following products, programs and services which we believe differentiate our brand: (1) homes with high quality construction located in attractive areas and desirable communities that are supported by our industry leading 15-year transferable structural warranty, which is a 15-year warranty in all of our markets other than Texas and a 10-year transferable structural warranty in our Texas markets; (2) fully furnished model homes and highly-trained sales consultants to build the buyer’s confidence and enhance the quality of the homebuying experience; (3) our Whole Home Building Standards which are designed to deliver features and benefits that satisfy the buyer’s expectation for a better-built home, including a more eco-friendly and energy efficient home that we believe will generally save our customers up to 30% on their energy costs compared to a home that is built to minimum code requirements; (4)(3) our StyleSmart Design CentersStudios and StyleSmart Design Consultants that assist our homebuyers in selecting product and design options; (4) fully furnished model homes and highly-trained sales consultants to build the buyer’s confidence and enhance the quality of the homebuying experience; (5) our mortgage financing programs that we offer through M/I Financial, including competitive fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans; (6) our Ready Now Homes program which offers homebuyers the opportunity to close on certain new homes in 60 days or less; and (7) our unwavering focus on customer care and customer satisfaction.
We invest in designing and decorating fully-furnished and distinctive model homes intended to create an atmosphere reflecting how people live today and help our customers imagine the possibilities for a “home of their own -- just the way they dreamed it.” We also carefully select the interior decorating and design of our model homes to reflect the lifestyles of our prospective buyers. We believe these models showcase our homes at their maximum livability and potential and provide ideas and inspiration for our customers to incorporate valuable design options into their new home.
Our company-employed sales consultants are trained and prepared to meet the buyer’s expectations and build the buyer’s confidence by fully explaining the features and benefits of our homes, helping each buyer determine which home best suits their needs, explaining the construction process, and assisting the buyer in choosing the best financing option. Significant attention is given to the ongoing training of all sales personnel to assure a high level of professionalism and product knowledge. As of December 31, 2017, we employed 212 home sales consultants.
By offering Whole Home Energy-Efficient Homes to our customers, we enable our homebuyers to save on their energy costs (the second largest cost of home ownership) compared to a home that is built to minimum code requirements. We use independent RESNET-Certified Raters and the HERS (Home Energy Rating System) Index, the national standard for energy efficiency, to measure the performance of our homes, including insulation, ventilation, air tightness, and the heating and cooling system. Our divisions’ average scores are generally lower (and, therefore, better) than the Environmental Protection Agency’s Energy Star target standard of 72-75 or the average score for a resale home (130 or higher).
To further enhance the homebuying process, we operate StyleSmart Design CentersStudios in a majority of our markets. Our design centersDesign Studios allow our homebuyers to select from thousandsa variety of product and design options that are available for purchase as part of the original construction of their homes. Our centers are staffed with StyleSmart Design Consultants who help our homebuyers select the right combination of options to meet their budget, lifestyle and design sensibilities. In most of our markets, we offer our homebuyers the option to consider and make design planning decisions using our Envision online design tool. We believe this tool is helpful for prospective buyers to use during the planning phase and makes their actual visit to our design centersDesign Studios more productive and efficient as our consultants are able to view the buyer’s preliminary design selections and pull samples in advance of the buyer’s visit.
We also invest in designing and decorating fully-furnished and distinctive model homes intended to create an atmosphere reflecting how people live today and help our customers imagine the possibilities for a “home of their own, just the way they dreamed it.” We carefully select the interior decorating and design of our model homes to reflect the lifestyles of our prospective buyers. We believe these models showcase our homes at their maximum livability and potential and provide ideas and inspiration for our customers to incorporate valuable design options into their new home.
Our company-employed sales consultants are trained and prepared to meet the buyer’s expectations and build the buyer’s confidence by fully explaining the features and benefits of our homes, helping each buyer determine which home best suits the buyer’s needs, explaining the construction process, and assisting the buyer in choosing the best financing option. We give significant attention to the ongoing training of all sales personnel to assure a high level of professionalism and product knowledge. As of December 31, 2020, we employed 257 home sales consultants.
We also offer specialized mortgage financing programs through M/I Financial to assist our homebuyers. We offer conventional financing options along with programs offered by the Federal Housing Authority (“FHA”), U.S. Veterans Administration (“VA”), United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and state housing bond agencies. M/I Financial offers our homebuyers “one-stop” shopping by providing mortgage and title services for the purchase of their home, which we believe saves our customers both time and money. By working with many of the major mortgage providers in the country, we aimseek to offer our homebuyers unique programs with below-market financing options that are more competitive than what homebuyers could obtain on their own. With respect to title services, the Company’s title subsidiaries work closely with our homebuilding divisions so that we are able to provide an organized and efficient home delivery process.
We also build inventory homes in most of our communities to offer homebuyers the opportunity to close on certain new homes in 60 days or less. These homes enhance our marketing and sales efforts to prospective homebuyers who require a home delivery within a short time frame and allow us to compete effectively with existing homes available in the market and improve our profits
and returns.market. We determine our inventory homes strategy in each market based on local market factors, such as job growth, the number of job relocations, housing demand and supply, seasonality and our past experience in the market. We maintain a level of inventory homes in each community based on our current and planned sales pace, and we monitor and adjust inventory homes on an ongoing basis as conditions warrant.
We seek to keep our homebuyers actively involved in the construction of their new home, givingproviding them increasedwith continued communication throughout the design and construction process. Our goal is to put the buyer first and enhance the total homebuying experience. We believe prompt and courteous responses to homebuyers’ needs throughout the homebuying process reduce post-delivery repair costs, enhance our reputation for quality and service, and encourage repeat and referral business from homebuyers and the real estate community.
Finally, we believe our ultimate differentiator comes from the principles our company was founded upon -- integrity and delivering superior customer service and a quality product. Our customer satisfaction scores are measured by an independent third-party company at both 30 days and 6 months after delivery to hold us accountable for building a home of the highest quality.
We market our homes using digital and traditional media such as newspapers, direct mail, billboards, radio and television.media. The particular media used differs from market to market based on area demographics and other competitive factors. In recent years, we have also significantly increased the reach ofWe market directly to consumers via newspaper, direct mail, billboards, radio, and television as well as internet marketing using our website, through enhanced search engine optimization, paid search, and search engine marketing.display advertising. We also have increasedleverage our presence on referral sites, such as Zillow.com and NewHomeSource.com, to drive sales leads to our internet sales associates. We also use email and database marketing to maintain communication with existing prospects and customers. We use our social media presence to communicate to potential homebuyers the experiences of customers who have purchased our homes and to provide content about our homes and design features. In the last five years, we have experienced a significant increase in sales from buyers who initially discovered us online.
In late 2017,response to the changing needs of consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic, we made several adjustments to our sales and marketing strategy. First, we encouraged consumers to shop for a new home from the comfort of their existing home by mailing a free VR Headset to them upon request. Each of our home plans was professionally scanned in 3D, creating an immersive Virtual Tour experience. Second, as many consumers expressed discomfort visiting public spaces, we began preparing for the launchoffering Virtual Appointments. This enabled our New Home Sales Consultants to provide a live home tour while engaging in personalized selling conversation. Finally, we launched flexABILITY across many of our “Welcomeexisting home plans which allows our customers to Better” brand refresh campaigntake existing space in January 2018. This campaign allows us to refocus, as a homebuilder, on what we do and how we do it. Inspiration for “Welcome to Better” came from the words of our Founder Irving Schottenstein, “From the very beginning, M/I’s core values were clearly understood … build a better home and care aboutcreate the customer.” Combined with visual changes to our brand, this campaign reflects the values of M/I Homes - Quality, Integrity, Trust and Care. “Welcome to Better” invites the customer to explore how we are meaningfully different and calls attention to the high standards we maintain.room they most need, like a home office, classroom, multigenerational suite, or home gym.
Product Lines, Design and Construction
Our residential communities are generally located in suburban areas that are easily accessible through public and personal transportation. Our communities are designed as neighborhoods that fit existing land characteristics. We strive to achieve diversity among architectural styles within a community by offering a variety of house models and several exterior design options for each model. We also preserve existing trees and foliage whenever practicable. Normally, homes of the same type or color may not be built next to each other. We believe our communities have attractive entrances with distinctive signage and landscaping and that our added attention to community detail avoids a “development” appearance and gives each community a diversified neighborhood appearance.
We offer homes ranging from a base sales price of approximately $170,000$200,000 to $1,400,000$1,045,000 and from approximately 1,3001,100 to 5,500 square feet. In addition to single-family detached homes, we also offer attached townhomes in someseveral of our markets. ByWe believe that offering a wide range of homes we are ableenables us to attract first-time, millennial, move-up, empty-nester and luxury homebuyers. It is our goal to sell more than one home to our buyers, and we believe we have had success in this strategy.
We devote significant resources to the research, design and development of our homes to meet the demands of our buyers and evolving market requirements. For example, in 2020, our customers expressed increased interest in additional bedroom suite opportunities on the main floor, open bright spaces, improved work-from-home spaces and get-away spaces within the home such as lofts or bonus room options. Across all of our divisions, we currently offer over 700600 different floor plans designed to reflect current lifestyles and design trends. Our Showcase Collection is designed for
We continue to change and update our move-upplan portfolio based on trends and luxury homebuyers and offers more design options, larger floor plans, and a higher-end product line of homes in upscale communities.market conditions. In addition, we are developingcontinue to develop new floor plans and communities specifically for the growing empty-nester market. These plans (primarily ranch and main floor master bedroom type plans) focus on move-down buyers, are smaller in size, and feature outdoor living potential, fewer bedrooms, and better community amenities. Our homebuilding divisions often share successful plans with other divisions, when appropriate.
We are actively implementinghave successfully implemented our “Smart Series” plans of smaller square footage to target a more affordable sales price in severalacross all of our markets.divisions, and it represented approximately 34% of our total sales for the year ended December 31, 2020. Our “Smart Series” is intended to offer buyers excellent value, great locations, and pre-selected packages of upgraded finishes and appliances. We targetOur “Smart Series” targets entry-level and move-upmove-down buyers and focusfocuses significant attention on current trends,affordability, livability and offering some design flexibility to our customers. This series has become an important and successful part of our overall product lineup. Within the last year, we introduced several new townhome options into the Smart Series Collections. Our new townhome Smart Series programs are intended to be more affordable and take advantage of higher-density opportunities as stand-alone communities or paired with our conventional Smart Series single-family neighborhoods.
Our “City Collection” floor plans offer a unique and upscale urban lifestyle by utilizing narrow lots, detached rear garages and thoughtfully designed interiors. Our City Collection enables us to participate in new infill development opportunities that extend beyond our traditional suburban markets.
We have value-engineereddesign all of our product lines to reduce production costs and construction cycle times while adhering to our quality standards and using materials and construction techniques that
reflect our commitment to more environmentally conscious homebuilding methods. One of our core values is to offer homes that reflect current design and lifestyle trends. Our homebuilding divisions share successful plans with other divisions, when appropriate.
All of our homes are constructed according to proprietary designs that meet the applicable FHA and VA requirements and all local building codes. We attempt to maintain efficient operations by utilizing standardized materials. Our raw materials consist primarily of lumber, concrete and similar construction materials, and while these materials are generally available from a variety of sources, we have reduced construction and administrative costs by executing national purchasing contracts with select vendors. Our homes are constructed according to standardized prototypes which are designed and engineered to provide innovative product design while attempting to minimize costs of construction and control product consistency and availability. We generally employ subcontractors for the installation of site improvements and the construction of homes. The construction of each home is supervised by a Personal Construction Supervisor who reports to a Production Manager, both of whom are employees of the Company. Our Personal Construction Supervisors manage the scheduling and construction process. Subcontractor work is performed pursuant to written agreements that require our subcontractors to comply with all applicable laws and labor practices, follow local building codes and permits, and meet performance, warranty, and insurance requirements. The agreements generally have three-year terms, and specify a fixed price for labor and materials. The agreementsmaterials and are structured to provide price protection for a majority of the higher-cost phases of construction for homes in our backlog.
We begin construction on a majority of our homes after we have obtained a sales contract and preliminary oral confirmation from the buyer’s lender that financing should be approved. In certain markets, contracts may be accepted contingent upon the sale of an existing home, and construction may be authorized through a certain phase prior to satisfaction of that contingency. The construction of our homes typically takes approximately four to six months from the start of construction to completion of the home, depending on the size and complexity of the particular home being built, weather conditions, and the availability of labor, materials, and supplies. We also construct inventory homes (i.e., homes started in the absence of an executed contract) to facilitate delivery of homes on an immediate-need basis under our Ready Now Homes program and to provide presentation of new products. For some prospective buyers, selling their existing home has become a less predictable process and, as a result, when they sell their home, they often need to find, buy and move into a new home in 60 days or less. Other buyers simply prefer the certainty provided by being able to fully visualize a home before purchasing it. Of the total number of homes closed in 2017both 2020 and 2016, 47% and 48%, respectively,2019, 49% were inventory homes which include both homes started as inventory homes and homes that started under a contract that were later cancelled and became inventory homes as a result.
Backlog
We sell our homes under standard purchase contracts, which generally require a homebuyer deposit at the time of signing the contract. The amount of the deposit varies among markets and communities. We also generally require homebuyers to pay additional deposits when they select options or upgrades for their homes. Most of our home purchase contracts stipulate that if
a homebuyer cancels a contract with us, we have the right to retain the homebuyer’s deposits. However, we generally permit our homebuyers to cancel their obligations and obtain refunds of all or a portion of their deposits (unless home construction has started) in the event mortgage financing cannot be obtained within the period specified in their contract to maintain goodwill with the potential buyer.
Backlog consists of homes that are under contract but have not yet been delivered. Ending backlog represents the number of homes in backlog from the previous period plus the number of net new contracts (new contracts for homes less cancellations) generated during the current period minus the number of homes delivered during the current period. The backlog at any given time will be affected by cancellations. Due to the seasonality of the homebuilding industry, the number of homes delivered has historically increased from the first to the fourth quarter in any year. Additionally, given the disruption in economic activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, our results for the year ended December 31, 2020 may not necessarily be indicative of the results that we may achieve in future periods.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had a total of 2,0144,389 homes in backlog with $791.3 millionan aggregate sales value in backlogof $1.8 billion, in various stages of completion, including homes that are under contract but for which construction had not yet begun. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had a total of 1,8042,671 homes in backlog, with $685.5 millionan aggregate sales value in backlog.of $1.1 billion. Homes included in year-end backlog are typically included in homes delivered in the subsequent year.
Warranty
We provide certain warranties in connection with our homes and also perform inspections with the buyer of each home immediately prior to delivery and as needed after a home is delivered. The Company offers both a transferable limited warranty program (“Home Builder’s Limited Warranty”) and a transferable structural limited warranty. The Home Builder’s Limited Warranty covers construction defects for a statutory period based on geographic market and state law (currently ranging from five to ten years for the states in which the Company operates) and includes a mandatory arbitration clause. The structural warranty is for 10 or 15 years for homes sold after December 1, 2015 and 10 or 30 years for homes sold after April 25, 1998 and on or before December 1, 2015. We also pass along to our homebuyers all warranties provided by the manufacturers or suppliers of components installed in each home.
Although our subcontractors are generally required to repair and replace any product or labor defects during their respective warranty periods, we are ultimately responsible to the homeowner for making such repairs during our applicable warranty period. Accordingly, we have estimated and established reserves for both our Home Builder’s Limited Warranty and potential future structural warranty costs based on the number of home deliveries and historical data trends for our communities. In the case of the structural warranty, we also employ an actuary to assist in the determination of our future costs on an annual basis. Our warranty expense (excluding stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities in 2020 and 2018 (as more fully discussed in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements)) was approximately 0.8%, 0.9% and 1.0%0.7% of total housing revenue in 2017, 2016both 2020 and 2015, respectively.2019, and 0.8% of total housing revenue in 2018. Land Acquisition and Development
We continuously evaluate land acquisition opportunities in the normal course of our homebuilding business, and we focus on both the replenishment ofreplenishing our lot positions and adding to our lot positions in key submarkets to expand our market share. Our goal is to maintain an approximate three to five-year supply of lots, including lots controlled under option contracts and purchase agreements, which we believe provides an appropriate horizon for addressing regulatory matters and land development and the subsequent build-out of the homes in each community, and allows us to manage our business plan for future home deliveries.
We seek to meet our need for lots by obtaining advantageous land positions in desirable locations in a cost effective manner that is responsive to market conditions and maintains our financial strength and liquidity. Before acquiring land, we complete extensive comparative studies and analyses, which assist us in evaluating the economic feasibility of theeach land acquisition. We consider a number of factors, including projected rates of return, estimated gross margins, and projected pace of absorption and sales prices of the homes to be built, all of which are impacted by our evaluation of population and employment growth patterns, demographic trends and competing new home subdivisions and resales in the relevant sub-market.
We attempt to acquire land with a minimum cash investment and negotiate takedown options when available from sellers. We also restrict the use of guarantees or commitments in our land contracts to limit our financial exposure to the amounts invested in the property and pre-development costs during the life of the community we are developing. We believe this approach significantly reduces our risk. In addition, we generally obtain necessary development approvals before we acquire land. We acquire land primarily through contingent purchase agreements, which typically condition our obligation to purchase land upon approval of zoning and utilities, as well as our evaluation of soil and subsurface conditions, environmental and wetland conditions, market analysis, development costs, title matters and other property-related criteria. All land and lot purchase agreements and the funding of land purchases require the approval of our corporate land acquisition committee, which is
comprised of our senior management team and key operating and financial executives. Further details relating to our land option agreements are included in Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2017,2020, we continued to increase our investments in land acquisition, land development and housing inventory to meet increasing housing demand and expand our operations in certain markets. In 20172020 and 2016,2019, we developed over 72%83% and 74%81%, respectively, of our lots internally, primarily due to a lack of availability of developed lots in desirable locations in the market. Raw land that requires development generally remains more available. In order to minimize our investment and risk of large exposure in a single location, we have periodically partnered with other land developers or homebuilders to share in the cost of land investment and development through joint ownership and development agreements, joint ventures, and other similar arrangements. For joint venture arrangements where a special purpose entity is established to own the property, we enter into limited liability company or similar arrangements (“LLCs”) with the other partners. Further details relating to our joint venture arrangements are included in Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. During the development of lots, we are required by some municipalities and other governmental authorities to provide completion bonds or letters of credit for sewer, streets and other improvements. The development agreements under which we are required to provide completion bonds or letters of credit are generally not subject to a required completion date and only require that the improvements are in place in phases as homes are built and sold. In locations where development has progressed, the amount of development work remaining to be completed is typically less than the remaining amount of bonds or letters of credit due to timing delays in obtaining release of the bonds or letters of credit.
Our ability to continue development activities over the long-term will depend upon, among other things, a suitable economic environment and our continued ability to locate suitable parcels of land, enter into options or agreements to purchase such land, obtain governmental approvals for such land, and consummate the acquisition and development of such land.
In the normal course of our homebuilding business, we balance the economic risk of owning lots and land with the necessity of having lots available for construction of our homes. The following table sets forth our land position in lots (including lots held in joint venture arrangements) at December 31, 2017:2020: | | | Lots Owned | | | Lots Owned | |
Region | Developed Lots | Lots Under Development | Undeveloped Lots (a) | Total Lots Owned | Lots Under Contract | Total | Region | Developed Lots | Lots Under Development | Undeveloped Lots (a) | Total Lots Owned | Lots Under Contract | Total |
Midwest | 2,360 |
| 218 |
| 1,878 |
| 4,456 |
| 6,220 |
| 10,676 |
| |
Northern | | Northern | 3,193 | | 370 | | 3,223 | | 6,786 | | 7,801 | | 14,587 | |
Southern | 2,227 |
| 1,381 |
| 1,862 |
| 5,470 |
| 7,668 |
| 13,138 |
| Southern | 2,289 | | 1,878 | | 5,846 | | 10,013 | | 14,909 | | 24,922 | |
Mid-Atlantic | 775 |
| 433 |
| 488 |
| 1,696 |
| 3,021 |
| 4,717 |
| |
Total | 5,362 |
| 2,032 |
| 4,228 |
| 11,622 |
| 16,909 |
| 28,531 |
| Total | 5,482 | | 2,248 | | 9,069 | | 16,799 | | 22,710 | | 39,509 | |
| |
(a) | Includes our interest in raw land held by joint venture arrangements expected to be developed into 598 lots. |
(a)Includes our interest in raw land held by joint venture arrangements expected to be developed into 700 lots.
Financial Services
We sell our homes to customers who generally finance their purchases through mortgages. M/I Financial provides our customers with competitive financing and coordinates and expedites the loan origination transaction through the steps of loan application, loan approval, and closing and title services. M/I Financial provides financing services in all of our housing markets. We believe that our ability to offer financing to customers on competitive terms as a part of the sales process is an important factor in completing sales.
M/I Financial has been approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, FHA, VA and USDA to originate mortgages that are insured and/or guaranteed by these entities. In addition, M/I Financial has been approved by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) as a seller and servicer of mortgages and as a Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) issuer. Our agency approvals, along with a sub-servicing relationship, allow us to sell loans on either a servicing released or servicing retained basis. This option provides flexibility and additional financing options to our customers.
We also provide title and closing services to purchasers of our homes through our 100%-owned subsidiaries, TransOhio Residential Title Agency Ltd., M/I Title Agency Ltd., and M/I Title LLC, and our majority-owned subsidiary, Washington/Metro Residential Title Agency, LLC. Through these entities, we serve as a title insurance agent by providing title insurance policies and examination and closing services to purchasers of our homes in the Columbus, Cincinnati, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Tampa, Orlando, Sarasota, San Antonio, Houston, Dallas/Fort Worth, Austin and Washington, D.C.Indianapolis markets. In addition, TransOhio Residential Title Agency Ltd. provides examination and title insurance services to our housing markets in the Raleigh, Charlotte Chicago, Indianapolis and CincinnatiChicago markets. We assume no underwriting risk associated with the title policies.
Corporate Operations
Our corporate operations and home office are located in Columbus, Ohio, where we perform the following functions at a centralized level:
•establish strategy, goals and operating policies;
•ensure brand integrity and consistency across all local and regional communications;
•monitor and manage the performance of our operations;
•allocate capital resources;
•provide financing and perform all cash management functions for the Company, and maintain our relationship with lenders;
•maintain centralized information and communication systems; and
•maintain centralized financial reporting, internal audit functions, and risk management.
Competition
The homebuilding industry is fragmented and highly competitive. We operate as a top ten builder in the majority of our markets. We compete with numerous national, regional, and local homebuilders in each of the geographic areas in which we operate. Our competition ranges from small local builders to larger regional builders to publicly-owned builders and developers, some of which have greater financial, marketing, land acquisition, and sales resources than us. Previously owned homes and the availability of rental housing provide additional competition. We compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service, and reputation.
Our financial services operations compete with other mortgage lenders to arrange financings for homebuyers. Principal competitive factors include pricing, mortgage loan terms, underwriting criteria, interest rates, customer service and other features of mortgage loan products available to the consumer.
Government Regulation and Environmental Matters
Our homebuilding and financial services operations are subject to compliance with numerous laws and regulations. Our homebuilding operations must comply with various federal,local, state and localfederal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning environmental,the protection of health and the environment, including storm water and surface water management, soil, groundwater and wetlands protection, subsurface conditions and air quality protection and enhancement. Environmental laws and existing conditions may result in delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs and prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas.
Our homebuilding operations are also subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building, design, construction, sales, and similar matters. These regulations increase the cost to produce and market our products, and in some instances, delay our developers’ ability to deliver finished lots to us. Counties and cities in which we build homes have at times declared moratoriums on the issuance of building permits and imposed other restrictions in the areas in which sewage treatment facilities and other public facilities do not reach minimum standards. In addition, our homebuilding operations are regulated in certain areas by restrictive zoning and density requirements that limit the number of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. We may also experience extended timelines for receiving required approvals from municipalities or other government agencies that can delay our anticipated development and construction activities in our communities. During 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced some delays in receiving governmental and municipality approvals and expect that trend to continue.
Our mortgage company and title insurance agencies must comply withare subject to various local, state and federal and state lawsstatutes, ordinances, rules and regulations (including requirements for participation in programs offered by FHA, VA, USDA, Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). These laws and regulations restrict certain activities of our financial services operations as further described in our description of “Risk Factors” below in Item 1A. In addition, our financial services operations are subject to regulation at the state and federal level, including regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, (the “CFPB”), with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices.
Seasonality
Our homebuilding operations experience significant seasonality and quarter-to-quarter variability in homebuilding activity levels. In general, homes delivered increase substantially in the second half of the year. We believe that this seasonality reflects the tendency of homebuyers to shop for a new home in the spring with the goal of closing in the fall or winter, as well as the scheduling of construction to accommodate seasonal weather conditions. Our financial services operations also experience seasonality because their loan originations correspond with the delivery of homes in our homebuilding operations.
Additionally, given the disruption in economic activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, our results for the year ended December 31, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that we may achieve in future periods.
Human Capital
At December 31, 2017,2020, we employed 1,2381,515 people (including part-time employees), of which 985 were employedincluding 1,201 in homebuilding operations, 156 were employed206 in financial services and 97 were employed108 in management and administrative services. NoNone of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
We believe that our employees are our most important resource. To fuel our success, we seek to recruit the best talent in the homebuilding industry, whether they be new or seasoned homebuilding professionals, and advance all of our employees through training, development, mentoring, and career advancement. Our workforce development strategy is rooted in building a workforce in which individuals from a diverse mix of backgrounds, experiences and talents can thrive and contribute. We recognize the value of creating a collaborative, inclusive workplace, and to help foster such an environment, we promote a culture of mutual understanding and respect among employees, customers and building partners.
We believe in developing each employee’s professional skill set and promoting career development. Our operating divisions assign training to our employees based upon their particular roles and responsibilities. In addition, all of our employees must adhere to our code of conduct and participate in mandatory company-wide training sessions to ensure all employees follow the same set of safety and ethical standards. These training sessions cover topics such as workplace safety, cyber security, risk mitigation, harassment and discrimination.
We pay our employees competitively and offer a comprehensive set of benefits to full-time employees, including a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan to help employees plan for retirement, which we believe are competitive with others in our industry.
During 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented numerous safety protocols and procedures to protect our employees, customers and building partners, including complying with social distancing and other health and safety standards required by federal, state and local government agencies and taking into consideration guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health authorities. In addition, we modified the way we conduct many aspects of our business to reduce the number of in-person interactions. We implemented appointment-only customer interactions and sold homes via our digital platform and virtual correspondence. Our mortgage operations were also able to continue to close loans, at times utilizing drive-through closings. Further discussion of the potential impacts on our business from the COVID-19 pandemic is provided in our description of “Risk Factors” below in Item 1A.
Available Information
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC. These filings are available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Our periodic reports and any other information we file with the SEC may be inspected without charge and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.
Our website address is www.mihomes.com. We make available, free of charge, on or through our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our website also includes printable versions of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the charters for each of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference in, or otherwise made a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our future business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and liquiditycash flows and the market price for our securities are subject to numerous risks, many of which are driven by factors that we cannot control. The following cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and assumptions relevant to our business includes factors we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors beyond those listed below, including factors unknown to us and factors known to us which we have not currently determined to be material, could also adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and cash flows.flows and the market price for our securities. Also see “Special Note of Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Although the homebuilding industry generally experienced improved conditions in 2020, a deterioration in industry conditions or in broader economic conditions could have adverse effects on our business and results of operations.
Homebuilding Market and Economic Risks
The homebuilding industry is cyclical and affected by changes in general economic, real estate and other business conditions that could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Certain economic, real estate and other business conditions that have significant effects on the homebuilding industry include:
•employment levels and job and personal income growth;
•availability and pricing of financing for homebuyers;
•short and long-term interest rates;
•overall consumer confidence and the confidence of potential homebuyers in particular;
•demographic trends;
•changes in energy prices;
•housing demand from population growth, household formation and other demographic changes, among other factors;
•U.S. and global financial system and credit market stability;
•private party and governmental residential consumer mortgage loan programs, and federal and state regulation of lending and appraisal practices;
•federal and state personal income tax rates and provisions, including provisions for the deduction of residential consumer mortgage loan interest payments and other expenses;
•the supply of and prices for available new or existing homes (including lender-owned homes acquired through foreclosures and short sales) and other housing alternatives, such as apartments and other residential rental property;
•homebuyer interest in our current or new product designs and community locations, and general consumer interest in purchasing a home compared to choosing other housing alternatives; and
•real estate taxes.
These above conditions, among others, are complex and interrelated. Adverse changes in such business conditions may have a significant negative impact on our business. The negative impact may be national in scope but may also negatively affect some of the regions or markets in which we operate more than others. When such adverse conditions affect any of our larger markets, those conditions could have a proportionately greater impact on us than on some other homebuilding companies. We cannot predict their occurrence or severity, nor can we provide assurance that our strategic responses to their impacts would be successful.
In the event of a downturn in the homebuilding and mortgage lending industries, or if the national economy weakens, we could experience declines in the market value of our inventory and demand for our homes, which could have a significantly negative impact on our gross margins from home sales and financial condition and results of operations. Additional external factors, such as foreclosure rates, mortgage pricing and availability, and unemployment rates, could also negatively impact our results.
Potential customers may be less willing or able to buy our homes if any of these conditions have a negative impact on the homebuilding industry. In the future, our pricing strategies may be limited by market conditions. We may be unable to change the mix of our home offerings, reduce the costs of the homes we build or offer more affordable homes to maintain our gross margins or satisfactorily address changing market conditions in other ways. In addition, cancellations of home sales contracts in backlog may increase as homebuyers chooseincrease.
While the absorption pace of our new contracts per community improved in 2020 compared to not honor their contracts.2019, a decline in sales activity could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our financial services business is closely related to our homebuilding business, as it originates mortgage loans principally on behalf of purchasers of the homes we build. A decrease in the demand for our homes because of the existence of any of the foregoing conditions could also adversely affect the financial results of this segment of our business.
Additionally, we may be subject to increased counterparty risks, including purchasers of mortgages originated by M/I Financial being unwilling or unable to perform their obligations to us. To the extent a third-party is unwilling or unable to perform such obligations, our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows could be negatively impacted.
Increased competition levels in the homebuilding and mortgage lending industries could result in a reduction in our new contracts and homes delivered, along with decreases in the average sales prices of sold and delivered homes and/or decreased mortgage originations, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations.
The homebuilding industry is fragmented and highly competitive. We compete with numerous public and private homebuilders, including some that are substantially larger than us and may have greater financial resources than we do. We also compete with community developers and land development companies, some of which are also homebuilders or affiliates of homebuilders. Homebuilders compete for customers, land, building materials, subcontractor labor and financing. Competition for home orders is primarily is based upon home sales price, location of property, home style, financing available to prospective homebuyers, quality of homes built, customer service and general reputation in the community, and may vary by market, sub-market and even by community. Additionally, competition within the homebuilding industry can be impacted by an excess supply of new and existing homes available for sale resulting from a number of factors including, among other things, increases in unsold started homes available for sale and increases in home foreclosures. Increased competition may cause us to decrease our home sales prices and/or increase home sales incentives in an effort to generate new home sales and maintain homes in backlog until they close. Increased competition can also result in us selling fewer homes or experiencing a higher number of cancellations by homebuyers. These competitive pressures may negatively impact our future financial and operating results.
Through our financial services operations, we also compete with numerous banks and other mortgage bankers and brokers, some of which are larger than us and may have greater financial resources than we do. Competitive factors that affect our consumer
financial services operations include pricing, mortgage loan terms, underwriting criteria and customer service. To the extent that we are unable to adequately compete with other companies that originate mortgage loans, the results of operations from our mortgage operations may be negatively impacted.
A reduction in the availability of mortgage financing or a significant increase in mortgage interest rates or down payment requirements could adversely affect our business.
Any reduction in the availability of the financing provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could adversely affect interest rates, mortgage availability and our sales of new homes and origination of mortgage loans.
FHA and VA mortgage financing support continues to beremains an important factor in marketing our homes. Any increases in down payment requirements, lower maximum loan amounts, or limitations or restrictions on the availability of FHA and VA financing support could adversely affect interest rates, mortgage availability and our sales of new homes and origination of mortgage loans.
Even if potential customers do not need financing, changes in the availability of mortgage products may make it harder for them to sell their current homes to potential buyers who need financing, which may lead to lower demand for new homes.
While mortgageMortgage interest rates increased modestly in 2017, they currently remainremained near historical lows. The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark ratelows for the last several times during 2017 and additional increasesyears. Increases in interest rates are likely, and these (or further) increases could affectincrease the costs of owning a home and could reduce the demand for our homes.
Many of our homebuyers obtain financing for their home purchases from M/I Financial. If, due to the factors discussed above, M/I Financial is limited from making or unable to make loan products available to our homebuyers, our home sales and our homebuilding and financial services results of operations may be adversely affected.
If land is not available at reasonable prices or terms, our homes sales revenue and results of operations could be negatively impacted and/or we could be required to scale back our operations in a given market.
Our operations depend on our ability to obtain land for the development of our communities at reasonable prices and with terms that meet our underwriting criteria. Our ability to obtain land for new communities may be adversely affected by changes in the general availability of land, the willingness of land sellers to sell land at reasonable prices, competition for available land, availability of financing to acquire land, zoning, regulations that limit housing density and other market conditions. If the
supply of land, and especially developed lots, appropriate for development of communities is limited because of these factors, or for any other reason, the number of homes that we build and sell may decline. To the extent that we are unable to timely purchase land or enter into new contracts for the purchase of land at reasonable prices, due to the lag between the time we acquire land and the time we begin selling homes, our revenue and results of operations could be negatively impacted and/or we could be required to scale back our operations in a given market.
During 2020, we experienced increased land prices but were generally able to offset the increase through increased prices and lower construction costs.
Our land investment exposes us to significant risks, including potential impairment charges, that could negatively impact our profits if the market value of our inventory declines.
We must anticipate demand for new homes several years prior to homes being sold to homeowners. There are significant risks inherent in controlling or purchasing land, especially as the demand for new homes fluctuates and land purchases become more competitive, as has recently been the case, which can increase the costs of land. There is often a significant lag time between when we acquire land for development and when we sell homes in neighborhoods we have planned, developed and constructed. The value of undeveloped land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant, and fluctuations in value can reduce profits. Economic conditions could require that we sell homes or land at a loss, or hold land in inventory longer than planned, which could significantly impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock performance. Additionally, if conditions in the homebuilding industry decline in the future, we may be required to evaluate our inventory for potential impairment, which may result in additional valuation adjustments, which could be significant and could negatively impact our financial results and condition. We cannot make any assurances that the measures we employ to manage inventory risks and costs will be successful.
Supply shortages and risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.
The residential construction industry experiences labor and material shortages and risks from time to time, including: work stoppages; labor disputes; shortages in qualified subcontractors and construction personnel; lack of availability of adequate utility infrastructure and services; our need to rely on local subcontractors who may not be adequately capitalized or insured; and delays in availability, or fluctuations in prices, of building materials. These labor and material shortages and risks can be more severe during periods of strong demand for housing or during periods in whichwhen the markets wherein which we operate experience natural disasters
that have a significant impact on existing residential and commercial structures. Any of these circumstances could delay the start or completion of our communities, increase the cost of developing one or more of our communities and increase the construction cost of our homes. To the extent that market conditions prevent the recovery of increased costs, including, among other things, subcontracted labor, developed lots, building materials, and other resources, through higher sales prices, our gross margins from home sales and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Due to the strong housing demand in 2020, we experienced periodic disruptions in our supply chain, including the availability of skilled labor and the timely availability of certain finishing products such as cabinets and appliances, which have lengthened the production cycles in certain markets. In 2020, we were able to manage these disruptions, but we cannot predict whether any widespread supply chain disruptions will occur in 2021 or the extent to which any such disruptions will affect our business in 2021.
Increased costs of lumber, framing, concrete, steel and other building materials could increase our construction costs. WeAlthough the cost of lumber increased during 2020, we were able to minimize the effect of the cost increases by increased prices and implementing other cost saving changes. Any future increased costs would put downward pressures on our gross margin if we are unable to continue to increase prices or manage through other cost saving changes. However, we are generally are unable to pass on increases in construction costs to customers who have already entered into sales contracts, as those sales contracts generally fix the price of the homes at the time the contracts are signed, which may occur before construction begins. Sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our gross margins from home sales, particularly if pricing competition restricts our ability to pass on any additional costs of materials or labor, thereby decreasing our gross margins from home sales.
We depend on the continued availability of and satisfactory performance of subcontracted labor for the construction of our homes and to provide related materials. As the demand for housing has increased,noted above, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, modest skilled labor and material shortages in certain of our markets as the supply chain adjusts to uneven industry growth.demand. The cost of labor may also be adversely affected by shortages of qualified subcontractors and construction personnel, changes in laws and regulations relating to union activity and changes in immigration laws and trends in labor migration. We cannot provide any assurance that there will be a sufficient supply of materials or a sufficient supply of, or satisfactory performance by, these unaffiliated third-party subcontractors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Tax law changes could make home ownership more expensive and/or less attractive.
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Act , which was signed into law in December 2017, significant expenses of owning a home, including residential consumer mortgage loan interest costs and real estate taxes, generally were deductible expenses for the purpose of calculating an individual’s federal, and in some cases state, taxable income, subject to various limitations. The Tax Act establishes new limits onIf the federal tax deductions individual taxpayers may take on mortgage loan interest payments and on state and local taxes, including property taxes. Through the end of 2025, under the Tax Act, the annual deduction for property taxes and state and local income or sales taxes generally is limited to $10,000. Furthermore, through the end of 2025, the deduction for mortgage interest is only available with respect to acquisition indebtedness that does not exceed $750,000. The Tax Act also raises the standard deduction to help fully or partially offset these new limits. These changes could, however, reduce the actual or perceived affordability of homeownership, and therefore the demand for homes, and/or have a moderating impact on home sales prices, especially in areas with relatively high housing prices and/or high state and local income taxes and real estate taxes. In addition, if the federal government further changes, or a state government changes its income tax laws by eliminating or substantially reducing the income tax benefits associated with homeownership, such as personal tax deductions for mortgage loan interest and real estate taxes, the after-tax cost of owning a home could measurably increase. Any such increases, in addition to increases in personal income tax rates, and/or tax deduction limits or restrictions enacted at the federal or state levels, including those enacted under the Tax Act, could adversely impact demand for and/or selling prices of new homes, including our homes, and the effect on our consolidated financial statements could be adverse and material.
We may not be able to offset the impact of inflation through price increases.
Inflation can have a long-term adverse impact on us because if the costs of land, materials and labor increase, we would need to attempt to increase the sale prices of our homes to maintain satisfactory margins. In a highly inflationary environment, we may not be precluded from raisingable to raise home prices enough to keep pace with the rateincreased costs of inflation,land and house construction, which could reduce our profit margins. In addition, significant inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which have a negative impact on demand for our homes. Moreover, with inflation, the costshomes, and would likely also increase our cost of capital will likely increase and the purchasing power of our cash resources can decline. Although the rate of inflation has been low for the last several years, we have recently been experiencing modest increases in the prices of labor and materials that exceed the rate of inflation, and some economists predict that government spending programs and other factors could lead to significant inflation in the future.capital.
Our limited geographic diversification could adversely affect us if the demand for new homes in our markets declines.
We have operations in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida and Texas. Our limited geographic diversification could adversely impact us if the demand for new homes or the level of homebuilding activity in our current markets declines, since there may not be a balancing opportunity in a stronger market in other geographic regions.
Changes in energy prices may have an adverse effect on the economies in certain markets we operate in and our cost of building homes.
The economies of some of the markets in which we operate are impacted by the health of the energy industry. To the extent that energy prices decline, the economies of certain of our markets may be negatively impacted which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, the pricing offered by our suppliers and subcontractors can be adversely affected by increases in various energy costs resulting in a negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Operational RisksWe may write-off intangible assets, such as goodwill.
We may not be successfulrecorded goodwill in integrating acquisitions or implementingconnection with our growth strategies or in achieving the benefits we expect from such acquisitions and strategies.
We may in the future consider growth or expansion of our operations in our current markets or in other areasacquisition of the country,assets and operations of Pinnacle Homes. On an ongoing basis, we will evaluate whether through strategic acquisitionsfacts and circumstances indicate any impairment of homebuilding companies or otherwise. The magnitude, timing and naturethe value of intangible assets. As circumstances change, we cannot provide any future expansionassurance that we will depend onrealize the value of these intangible assets. If we determine that a numbersignificant impairment has occurred, we will be required to write-off the impaired portion of factors, including our ability to identify suitable additional markets and/or acquisition candidates, the negotiation of acceptable terms, our financial capabilities and general economic and business conditions. Our expansion into new or existing markets, whether through acquisition or otherwise,intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and/results of operations in the period in which the write-off occurs.
Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or profitability,compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties.
M/I Financial originates mortgages, primarily for our homebuilding customers. A portion of the mortgage loans originated are sold on a servicing released, non-recourse basis, although M/I Financial remains liable for certain limited representations and anywarranties, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Accordingly, mortgage investors have in the past and could in the future acquisitionsseek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties. There can be no assurance that we will not have significant liabilities in respect of such claims in the future, which could exceed our reserves, or that the impact of such claims on our results of operations will not be material.
Homebuilding is subject to construction defect, product liability and warranty claims that can be significant and costly.
As a homebuilder, we are subject to construction defect, product liability and warranty claims in the ordinary course of business. These claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be significant and costly. We and many of our subcontractors have general liability, property, workers compensation and other business insurance. This insurance is intended to protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured retentions, deductibles and other coverage limits. The availability of insurance for construction defects, and the scope of the coverage, are currently limited and the policies that can be obtained are costly and often include exclusions. There can be no assurance that coverage will not be further restricted or become more costly. Also, at times we have waived certain provisions of our customary subcontractor insurance requirements, which increases our and our insurers’ exposure to claims and increases the possibility that our insurance will not cover all the costs we incur.
We record warranty and other reserves for the homes we sell based on a number of factors, including historical experience in our markets, insurance and actuarial assumptions and our judgment with respect to the qualitative risks associated with the types of homes we build. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these liability reserves, our actual future liability could differ significantly from our reserves. Given the inherent uncertainties, we cannot provide assurance that our insurance coverage, our subcontractor arrangements and our reserves will be adequate to address all of our construction defect, product liability and warranty claims. If the costs to resolve these claims exceed our estimates, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We have received claims related to stucco installation from homeowners in certain of our communities in our Tampa and Orlando, Florida markets and have been named as a defendant in legal proceedings initiated by certain of such homeowners. While we have estimated our overall future stucco repair costs, our review of the stucco-related issues in our Florida communities is ongoing. Our estimate of our overall stucco repair costs is based on our judgment, various assumptions and internal data. Given the inherent uncertainties, we cannot provide assurance that the final costs to resolve these claims will not exceed our accrual and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. See Note 1 and Note 8 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding these stucco claims and our warranty reserves.
Our subcontractors can expose us to warranty and other risks.
We rely on subcontractors to construct our homes, and in many cases, to select and obtain building materials. Despite our detailed specifications and quality control procedures, in some cases, it may be determined that subcontractors used improper construction processes or defective materials in the construction of our homes. Although our subcontractors have principal responsibility for defects in the work they do, we have ultimate responsibility to the homebuyers. When we identify these defects, we repair them in accordance with our warranty obligations. Improper construction processes and defective products widely used in the homebuilding industry can result in the dilutionneed to perform extensive repairs to large numbers of existing shareholdershomes. The cost of complying with our warranty obligations may be significant if we issueare unable to recover the cost of repairs from subcontractors, materials suppliers and insurers.
We also can suffer damage to our common shares as consideration. Acquisitions also involve numerous risks,reputation, and may be exposed to possible liability, if subcontractors fail to comply with applicable laws, including difficulties inlaws involving things that are not within our control. When we learn about potentially improper practices by subcontractors, we try to cause the assimilation of the acquired company’s operations, the incurrence of unanticipated liabilities or expenses, the risk of impairing inventorysubcontractors to discontinue them. However, we may not always be able to cause our subcontractors to discontinue potentially improper practices, and other assets related to the acquisition, the diversion of management’s attention and resources from other business concerns, risks associated with entering markets in whicheven when we have limited or no direct experience and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. In addition,can, we may not be able to improveavoid claims against us for personal injury, property damage or other losses relating to prior actions of our earningssubcontractors.
Risks Related to Indebtedness and Financing
The terms of our indebtedness may restrict our ability to operate and, if our financial performance declines, we may be unable to maintain compliance with the covenants in the documents governing our indebtedness.
Our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility dated July 18, 2013, as a result of acquisitions,amended, with M/I Homes, Inc. as borrower and guaranteed by the Company's wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiaries (the “Credit Facility”), the indenture governing our 4.95% Senior Notes due 2028 (the “2028 Senior Notes”) and the indenture governing our 5.625% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”) impose restrictions on our operations and activities. These restrictions and/or our failure to successfully identify and manage future acquisitionscomply with the terms of our indebtedness could have ana material adverse impacteffect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to operate our business.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants, including financial covenants relating to a minimum consolidated tangible net worth requirement, a minimum interest coverage ratio or liquidity requirement, and a maximum leverage ratio. Failure to comply with these covenants or any of the other restrictions of the Credit Facility, whether because of a decline in our operating results.performance or otherwise, could result in a default under the Credit Facility. If a default occurs, the affected lenders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable, which could cause a default under the documents governing any of our other indebtedness that is then outstanding if we are not able to repay such indebtedness from other sources. If this happens and we are unable to obtain waivers from the required lenders, the lenders could exercise their rights under the documents governing our indebtedness, including forcing us into bankruptcy or liquidation.
The indentures governing the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes also contain covenants that may restrict our ability to operate our business and may prohibit or limit our ability to grow our operations or take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. Failure to comply with these covenants or any of the other restrictions or covenants contained in the indentures governing the 2028 Senior Notes and/or the 2025 Senior Notes could result in a default under the applicable indenture, in which case holders of the 2028 Senior Notes and/or the 2025 Senior Notes may be entitled to cause the sums evidenced by such notes to become due immediately. This acceleration of our obligations under the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes could force us into bankruptcy or liquidation and we may be unable to repay those amounts without selling substantial assets, which might be at prices well below the long-term fair values and carrying values of the assets. Our ability to comply with the foregoing restrictions and covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition, and we and our subsidiaries may incur additional indebtedness, which could increase the risks created by our indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $646.2 million of indebtedness (net of debt issuance costs), excluding issuances of letters of credit, our $125 million secured mortgage warehousing agreement, with M/I Financial as borrower (the “MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement”) and our $90 million mortgage repurchase facility, with M/I Financial as borrower (the “MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility”), and we had $439.0 million of remaining availability for borrowings under the Credit Facility. In addition, under the terms of the Credit Facility, the indentures governing the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes and the documents governing our other indebtedness, we have the ability, subject to applicable debt covenants, to incur additional indebtedness. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could magnify other risks related to us and our business. Our indebtedness and any future indebtedness we may incur could have a significant adverse effect on our future financial condition.
For example:
•a significant portion of our cash flow may be required to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness, which could reduce the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;
•borrowings under the Credit Facility bear, and borrowings under any new facility could bear, interest at floating rates, which could result in higher interest expense in the event of an increase in interest rates;
•the terms of our indebtedness could limit our ability to borrow additional funds or sell assets to raise funds, if needed, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;
•our debt level and the various covenants contained in the Credit Facility, the indentures governing our 2028 Senior Notes and 2025 Senior Notes and the documents governing our other indebtedness could place us at a relative competitive disadvantage compared to some of our competitors; and
•the terms of our indebtedness could prevent us from raising the funds necessary to repurchase all of the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes tendered to us upon the occurrence of a change of control, which, in each case, would constitute a default under the applicable indenture, which in turn could trigger a default under the Credit Facility and the documents governing our other indebtedness.
In the ordinary course of business, we are required to obtain performance bonds from surety companies, the unavailability of which could adversely affect our results of operations and/or cash flows.
As is customary in the homebuilding industry, we are often required to provide surety bonds to secure our performance under construction contracts, development agreements and other arrangements. Our ability to obtain surety bonds primarily depends upon our credit rating, capitalization, working capital, past performance, management expertise and certain external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety market and the underwriting practices of surety bond issuers. The ability to obtain surety bonds also can be impacted by the willingness of insurance companies and sureties to issue performance bonds. If we cannot obtain surety bonds when required, our results of operations and/or cash flows could be adversely impacted.
The M/I Financial warehouse facilities will expire in 2021.
M/I Financial uses two mortgage warehouse facilities to finance eligible residential mortgage loans originated by M/I Financial, the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility. These facilities will expire on May 28, 2021 and October 25, 2021, respectively. If we are unable to renew or replace the warehousing facilities when they mature, the activities of our financial services segment could be impeded and our home sales and our homebuilding and financial services results of operations may be adversely affected.
We have financial needs that we meet through the capital markets, including the debt and secondary mortgage markets, and disruptions in these markets could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position and/or cash flows.
We have financial needs that we meet through the capital markets, including the debt and secondary mortgage markets. Our requirements for additional capital, whether to finance operations or to service or refinance our existing indebtedness, fluctuate as market conditions and our financial performance and operations change. We cannot provide assurances that we will maintain cash reserves and generate sufficient cash flow from operations in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our debt or to fund other liquidity needs.
The availability of additional capital, whether from private capital sources or the public capital markets, fluctuates as our financial condition and general market conditions change. There may be times when the private capital markets and the public debt or equity markets lack sufficient liquidity or when our securities cannot be sold at attractive prices, in which case we would not be able to access capital from these sources. In addition, a weakening of our financial condition or deterioration in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary funds. Even if financing is available, it could be costly or have other adverse consequences.
There are a limited number of third-party purchasers of mortgage loans originated by our financial services operations. The exit of third-party purchasers of mortgage loans from the business, reduced investor demand for mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities in the secondary mortgage markets and increased investor yield requirements for those loans and securities may have an adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position and/or cash flows.
The mortgage warehousing agreement of our financial services segment will expire in June 2018.
M/I Financial is party to a $125 million secured mortgage warehousing agreement, as amended, among M/I Financial, the lenders party thereto and the administrative agent (the “MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement”). M/I Financial uses the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement to finance eligible residential mortgage loans originated by M/I Financial. The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement will expire on June 22, 2018. If we are unable to renew or replace the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement when it matures, the activities of our financial services segment could be seriously impeded and our home sales and our homebuilding and financial services results of operations may be adversely affected.
Reduced numbers of home sales may force us to absorb additional carrying costs.
We incur many costs even before we begin to build homes in a community. These include costs of preparing land and installing roads, sewage and other utilities, as well as taxes and other costs related to ownership of the land on which we plan to build homes. Reducing the rate at which we build homes extends the length of time it takes us to recover these additional costs. Also, we
frequently enter into contracts to purchase land and make deposits that may be forfeited if we do not fulfill our purchase obligation within specified periods.
If our ability to resell mortgages to investors is impaired, we may be required to broker loans.
M/I Financial sells a portion of the loans originated on a servicing released, non-recourse basis, although M/I Financial remains liable for certain limited representations and warranties related to loan sales and for repurchase obligations in certain limited circumstances. If M/I Financial is unable to sell loans to viable purchasers in the marketplace, our ability to originate and sell mortgage loans at competitive prices could be limited which would negatively affect our operations and our profitability. Additionally, if there is a significant decline in the secondary mortgage market declines significantly, our ability to sell mortgages could be adversely impacted and we would be required to make arrangements with banks or other financial institutions to fund our buyers’ closings. If we became unable to sell loans into the secondary mortgage market or directly to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or issue Ginnie Mae securities, we would have to modify our origination model, which, among other things, could significantly reduce our ability to sell homes.
Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties.Regulatory and Legal Risks
M/I Financial originates mortgages, primarily for our homebuilding customers. A portion of the mortgage loans originated are sold on a servicing released, non-recourse basis, although we remain liable for certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Accordingly, mortgage investors have in the past and could in the future seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties. There can be no assurance that we will not have significant liabilities in respect of such claims in the future, which could exceed our reserves, or that the impact of such claims on our results of operations will not be material.
Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected if pending or future legal claims against us are not resolved in our favor.
In addition to the legal proceedings related to stucco discussed below, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in certain other legal proceedings which are incidental to our business. While management currently believes that the ultimate resolution of these other legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows, such legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties. The Company has recorded a liability to provide for the anticipated costs, including legal defense costs, associated with the resolution of these other legal proceedings. However, the possibility exists that the costs to resolve these legal proceedings could differ from the recorded estimates and, therefore, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Similarly, if additional legal proceedings are filed against us in the future, including with respect to stucco installation in our Florida communities, the negative outcome of one or more of such legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The terms of our indebtedness may restrict our ability to operate and, if our financial performance declines, we may be unable to maintain compliance with the covenants in the documents governing our indebtedness.
Our $475 million unsecured revolving credit facility dated July 18, 2013, as amended, with M/I Homes, Inc. as borrower and guaranteed by the Company's wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiaries (the “Credit Facility”), the indenture governing our 5.625% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”) and the indenture governing our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) impose restrictions on our operations and activities. These restrictions and/or our failure to comply with the terms of our indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to operate our business.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants, including financial covenants relating to a minimum consolidated tangible net worth requirement, a minimum interest coverage ratio or liquidity requirement, and a maximum leverage ratio. Failure to comply with these covenants or any of the other restrictions of the Credit Facility, whether because of a decline in our operating performance or otherwise, could result in a default under the Credit Facility. If a default occurs, the affected lenders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable, which in turn could cause a default under the documents governing any of our other indebtedness that is then outstanding if we are not able to repay such indebtedness from other sources. If this happens and we are unable to obtain waivers from the required lenders, the lenders could exercise their rights under such documents, including forcing us into bankruptcy or liquidation.
The indenture governing the 2025 Senior Notes and the indenture governing the 2021 Senior Notes also contain covenants that may restrict our ability to operate our business and may prohibit or limit our ability to enhance our operations or take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. Failure to comply with these covenants or any of the other restrictions or covenants contained in the indenture governing the 2025 Senior Notes and/or the indenture governing the 2021 Senior Notes could result in a default under the applicable indenture, in which case holders of the 2025 Senior Notes and/or the 2021 Senior Notes may be entitled to cause the sums evidenced by such notes to become due immediately. This acceleration of our obligations under the 2025 Senior Notes and the 2021 Senior Notes could force us into bankruptcy or liquidation and we may be unable to repay those amounts without selling substantial assets, which might be at prices well below the long-term fair values and carrying values of the assets. Our ability to comply with the foregoing restrictions and covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions.
In addition, while the indenture governing our $86.3 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes”) does not contain any financial or operating covenants relating to or restrictions on the payment of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness or the repurchase or issuance of securities by us or any of our subsidiaries, the indenture does impose certain other requirements on us, such as the requirement to offer to repurchase the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes upon a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture. Our failure to comply with the requirements contained in the indenture governing the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes could result in a default under such indenture, in which case holders of the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes may be entitled to cause the sums evidenced by such notes to become due immediately. The acceleration of our obligations under the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes could have the same effect as an acceleration of the 2025 Senior Notes or the 2021 Senior Notes described above.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition, and we and our subsidiaries may incur additional indebtedness, which could increase the risks created by our indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $639.5 million of indebtedness (net of debt issuance costs), excluding issuances of letters of credit, the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and our $35 million mortgage repurchase agreement with M/I Financial as borrower, as amended and restated on October 30, 2017 (the “MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility”), and we had $426.0 million of remaining availability for borrowings under the Credit Facility. In addition, under the terms of the Credit Facility, the indentures governing the 2025 Senior Notes, 2021 Senior Notes and the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes and the documents governing our other indebtedness, we have the ability, subject to applicable debt covenants, to incur additional indebtedness. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could magnify other risks related to us and our business. Our indebtedness and any future indebtedness we may incur could have a significant adverse effect on our future financial condition.
For example:
a significant portion of our cash flow may be required to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness, which could reduce the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;
borrowings under the Credit Facility bear, and borrowings under any new facility could bear, interest at floating rates, which could result in higher interest expense in the event of an increase in interest rates;
the terms of our indebtedness could limit our ability to borrow additional funds or sell assets to raise funds, if needed, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;
our debt level and the various covenants contained in the Credit Facility, the respective indentures governing our 2025 Senior Notes and 2021 Senior Notes and the documents governing our other indebtedness could place us at a relative competitive disadvantage as compared to some of our competitors; and
the terms of our indebtedness could prevent us from raising the funds necessary to repurchase all of the 2025 Senior Notes and the 2021 Senior Notes tendered to us upon the occurrence of a change of control or all of the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, which, in each case, would constitute a default under the applicable indenture, which in turn could trigger a default under the Credit Facility and the documents governing our other indebtedness.
In the ordinary course of business, we are required to obtain performance bonds, the unavailability of which could adversely affect our results of operations and/or cash flows.
As is customary in the homebuilding industry, we are often required to provide surety bonds to secure our performance under construction contracts, development agreements and other arrangements. Our ability to obtain surety bonds primarily depends upon our credit rating, capitalization, working capital, past performance, management expertise and certain external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety market and the underwriting practices of surety bond issuers. The ability to obtain surety bonds also can be impacted by the willingness of insurance companies to issue performance bonds. If we were unable to obtain surety bonds when required, our results of operations and/or cash flows could be adversely impacted.
We can be injured by failures of persons who act on our behalf to comply with applicable regulations and guidelines.
There are instances in which subcontractors or others through whom we do business engage in practices that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines. When we learnbecome aware of practices relating to homes we build or financing we provide that do not comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations, we actively move to stop the non-complying practices as soon as possible. However, regardless of the steps we take after we learnbecome aware of practices that do not comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations, we can in some instances be subject to fines or other governmental penalties, and our reputation can be injured, due to the practices having taken place.
We could be adversely affected by efforts to impose joint employer liability on us for labor law violations committed by our subcontractors.
Our homes are constructed by employees of subcontractors and other parties. We have limited ability to control what these parties pay their employees or the rules they impose on their employees. However, various governmental agencies may seek to hold parties like us responsible for violations of wage and hour laws and other labor laws by subcontractors. A ruling by theThe National Labor Relations Board that(“NLRB”) has revised its joint employer standard a company, under some circumstances, could be held responsible for labor violations by its contractors has been recently withdrawn. Although this ruling has been withdrawn, a similar rulingnumber of times over the last few years and may do so again in the future periods. Future rulings by the National Labor Relations BoardNLRB or other courts or governmental agencies could make us responsible for labor violations committed by our subcontractors. Governmental rulings that hold us responsible for labor practices by our subcontractors could create substantial exposures for us under our subcontractor relationships.
We are subject to extensive government regulations, which could restrict our business and cause us to incur significant expense.
The homebuilding industry is subject to numerous local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations concerning building, zoning, sales, consumer protection, the environment, and similar matters. This regulation affects construction activities as well as sales activities, mortgage lending activities, land availability and other dealings with homebuyers. These statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations, and any failure to comply therewith, could give rise to additional liabilities or expenditures and have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.
We must also obtain licenses, permits and approvals from various governmental authorities in connection with our development activities, and these governmental authorities often have broad discretion in exercising their approval authority. Municipalities may also restrict or place moratoriums on the availability of utilities, such as water and sewer taps. In some areas, municipalities may enact growth control initiatives, which restrict the number of building permits available in a given year. In addition, we may be required to apply for additional approvals or modify our existing approvals because of changes in local circumstances or applicable law. If municipalities in which we operate take actions like these, it could have an adverse effect on our business by causing delays, increasing our costs, or limiting our ability to operate in those municipalities.
We incur substantial costs related to compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Any increase in legal and regulatory requirements may cause us to incur substantial additional costs or, in some cases, cause us to determine that certain property is not feasible for development.
Government restrictions, standards, or regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or potential climate change impacts are likely to result in restrictions on land development in certain areas and may increase energy, transportation, or raw material costs, which could reduce our gross margins and adversely affect our business.
Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected if pending or future legal claims against us are not resolved in our favor.
In addition to the legal proceedings related to stucco discussed above, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in certain other legal proceedings which are incidental to our business. While management currently believes that the ultimate resolution of these other legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, such legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties. The Company has recorded a liability to provide for the anticipated costs, including legal defense costs, associated with the resolution of these other legal proceedings. However, the costs to resolve these legal proceedings ultimately may exceed the recorded estimates and, therefore, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Similarly, if additional legal proceedings are filed against us in the future, including with respect to stucco installation in our Florida communities, the negative outcome of one or more of such legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
General Risk Factors
Because of the seasonal nature of our business, our quarterly operating results can fluctuate.
We experiencehave historically experienced noticeable seasonality and quarter-to-quarter variability in homebuilding activity levels. In general, the number of homes delivered and associated home sales revenue have increased during the third and fourth quarters, compared with the first and second quarters. We believe that this type of seasonality reflects the historical tendency of homebuyers to purchase new homes in the spring and summer with deliveries scheduled in the fall or winter, as well as the scheduling of construction to accommodate seasonal weather conditions in certain markets. There can be no assurance that this
seasonality pattern will continue to exist in future reporting periods. In addition, as a result of such variability, our historical performance may not be a meaningful indicator of future results.
Homebuilding is subject to construction defect, product liability and warranty claims that can be significant and costly.
As a homebuilder, we are subject to construction defect, product liability and warranty claims in the ordinary course of business. These claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be significant and costly. We and many of our subcontractors have general liability, property, workers compensation and other business insurance. This insurance is intended to protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured retentions, deductibles and other coverage limits. The availability of insurance for construction defects, and the scope of the coverage, are currently limited and the policies that can be obtained are costly and often include exclusions. There can be no assurance that coverage will not be further restricted or become more costly. Also, at times we have waived certain provisions of our customary subcontractor insurance requirements, which increases our and our insurers’ exposure to claims and increases the possibility that our insurance will not be adequate to protect us for all the costs we incur.
We record warranty and other reserves for the homes we sell based on a number of factors, including historical experience in our markets, insurance and actuarial assumptions and our judgment with respect to the qualitative risks associated with the types of homes we build. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these liability reserves, our actual future liability could differ significantly from our reserves. Given the inherent uncertainties, we cannot provide assurance that our insurance coverage, our subcontractor arrangements and our reserves will be adequate to address all of our construction defect, product liability and warranty claims. If the costs to resolve these claims exceed our estimates, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We have received claims related to stucco installation from homeowners in certain of our communities in our Tampa and Orlando, Florida markets and have been named as a defendant in legal proceedings initiated by certain of such homeowners. While we have estimated our overall future stucco repair costs, our review of the stucco-related issues in our Florida communities is ongoing. Our estimate of our overall stucco repair costs is based on our judgment, various assumptions and internal data. Given the inherent uncertainties, we cannot provide assurance that the final costs to resolve these claims will not exceed our accrual and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Please see Note 1 and Note 8 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding these stucco claims and our warranty reserves.
Our subcontractors can expose us to warranty and other risks.
We rely on subcontractors to construct our homes, and in many cases, to select and obtain building materials. Despite our detailed specifications and quality control procedures, in some cases, it may be determined that subcontractors used improper construction processes or defective materials in the construction of our homes. Although our subcontractors have principal responsibility for defects in the work they do, we have ultimate responsibility to the homebuyers. When we find these issues, we repair them in accordance with our warranty obligations. Improper construction processes and defective products widely used in the homebuilding industry can result in the need to perform extensive repairs to large numbers of homes. The cost of complying with our warranty obligations may be significant if we are unable to recover the cost of repairs from subcontractors, materials suppliers and insurers.
We also can suffer damage to our reputation, and may be exposed to possible liability, if subcontractors fail to comply with applicable laws, including laws involving things that are not within our control. When we learn about possibly improper practices by subcontractors, we try to cause the subcontractors to discontinue them. However, we are not always able to do that, and even when we can, it may not avoid claims against us relating to what the subcontractors already did.
Damage to our corporate reputation or brandsbrand from negative publicity could adversely affect our business, financial results and/or stock price.
Adverse publicity related to our company, industry, personnel, operations or business performance may cause damage to our corporate reputation or brandsbrand and may generate negative sentiment, potentially affecting the performance of our business or our stock price, regardless of its accuracy. Negative publicity can be disseminated rapidly through digital platforms, including social media, websites, blogs and newsletters. Customers and other interested parties value readily available information and often act on such information without further investigation and without regard to its accuracy. The harm may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction, and our success in preserving our brand image depends on our ability to recognize, respond to and effectively manage negative publicity in a rapidly changing environment. Adverse publicity or unfavorable commentary from any source could damage our reputation, reduce the demand for our homes or negatively impact the morale and performance of our employees, which could adversely affect our business.
Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could delay deliveries, increase costs and decrease demand for homes in affected areas.
Several of our markets, specifically our operations in Florida, North Carolina Washington, D.C. and Texas, are situated in geographical areas that are regularly impacted by severe storms, including hurricanes, flooding and tornadoes. For example, in September 2017, Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma caused disruption and delays in our Houston and Florida markets which may continue to impact results in these markets in fiscal 2018. In addition, our operations in the MidwestNorthern Region can be impacted by severe storms, including tornadoes. The occurrence of these or other natural disasters can cause delays in the completion of, or increase the cost of, developing one or more of our communities, and as a result could materially and adversely impact our results of operations.
We are subject to extensive government regulations, which could restrict our business and cause us to incur significant expense.
The homebuilding industry is subject to numerous local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations concerning building, zoning, sales, consumer protection, the environment, and similar matters. This regulation affects construction activities as well as sales activities, mortgage lending activities, land availability and other dealings with home buyers. These statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations, and any failure to comply therewith, could give rise to additional liabilities or expenditures and have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.
We must also obtain licenses, permits and approvals from various governmental authorities in connection with our development activities, and these governmental authorities often have broad discretion in exercising their approval authority. Municipalities may also restrict or place moratoriums on the availability of utilities, such as water and sewer taps. In some areas, municipalities may enact growth control initiatives, which will restrict the number of building permits available in a given year. In addition, we may be required to apply for additional approvals or modify our existing approvals because of changes in local circumstances or applicable law. If municipalities in which we operate take actions like these, it could have an adverse effect on our business by causing delays, increasing our costs, or limiting our ability to operate in those municipalities.
We incur substantial costs related to compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Any increase in legal and regulatory requirements may cause us to incur substantial additional costs or, in some cases, cause us to determine that certain property is not feasible for development.
Information technology failures and data security breaches could harm our business.
We use information technology, digital communications and other computer resources to carry out important operational and marketing activities and to maintain our business records. We have implemented systems and processes intended to address ongoing and evolving cyber security risks, secure our information technology, applications and computer systems, and prevent unauthorized access to or loss of sensitive, confidential and personal data. We also provide regular personnel awareness training regarding potential cyber security threats, including the use of internal tips, reminders and phishing assessments, to help ensure employees remain diligent in identifying potential risks. In addition, we have deployed monitoring capabilities to support early detection, internal and external escalation, and effective responses to potential anomalies. Many of theseour information technology and other computer resources are provided to us and/or maintained on our behalf by third-party service providers pursuant to agreements that specify to varying degrees certain security and service level standards. We also rely upon our third-party service providers to maintain effective cyber security measures to keep our information secure and to carry cyber insurance. Although we and our service providers employ what we believe are adequate security, disaster recovery and other preventative and corrective measures, our security measures, taken as a whole, may not be sufficient for all possible situations and may be vulnerable to, among other things, hacking, employee error, system error and faulty password management.
Our ability to conduct our business may be impaired if these informational technology and computer resources, including our website, are compromised, degraded or damaged or if they fail, whether due to a virus or other harmful circumstance, intentional penetration or disruption of our information technology resources by a third party, natural disaster, hardware or software corruption or failure or error (including a failure of security controls incorporated into or applied to such hardware or software), telecommunications system failure, service provider error or failure or intentional or unintentional personnel actions (including the failure to follow our security protocols), or lost connectivity to our networked resources. A material breach in the security of our information technology systems or other data security controls could result in third parties obtaining customer, employee or company data. A significant and extended disruption in the functioning of these resources, or breach thereof, including our website, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, sales and revenue,revenue.
In addition, breaches of our information technology systems or data security systems, including cyber attacks, could result in the unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of proprietary, personal identifying and confidential information (including information we collect and retain in connection with our business about our homebuyers, business partners and employees), and require us to incur significant expense (that we may not be able to recover in whole or in part from our service providers or responsible parties, or their or our insurers) to address and remediate or otherwise resolve these kindsresolve. The unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of issues. The release ofproprietary, personal identifying or confidential information may also lead to litigation or other proceedings against us by affected individuals and/or business partners and/or by regulators, and the outcome of such proceedings, which could include losses, penalties, fines, injunctions, expenses and charges recorded against our earnings, could have a material and adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.flows and harm our reputation. In addition, the costs of maintaining adequate protection against such
threats, based on considerations of their evolution, increasing sophistication, pervasiveness and frequency and/or increasingly demanding government-mandated standards or obligations regarding protective efforts,information security and privacy, could be material to our consolidated financial statements in a particular period or over various periods.
We are dependentdepend on the services of certain key employees, and the loss of their services could hurt our business.
Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract, train and retain skilled personnel. If we are unable to retain our key employees or attract, train and retain other skilled personnel in the future, thisour operations could be materially and adversely impactimpacted and we may incur additional expenses to identify and train new personnel.
Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other External Factors
Our business could be materially and adversely disrupted by COVID-19 or another epidemic, pandemic or similar public health issue, or fear of such an event, and the measures that international, federal, state and local public health and governmental authorities implement to address it.
An epidemic, pandemic or similar public health issue, or fear of such an event, and the measures undertaken by governmental authorities to address it, could significantly disrupt or prevent us from operating our business in the ordinary course for an extended period, and thereby, and/or along with any associated economic and/or social instability or distress, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures. On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency, and several states and municipalities have declared public health emergencies. Numerous international, federal, state and local public health and governmental authorities have taken extraordinary and wide-ranging actions to contain and combat the outbreak and spread of COVID-19, including quarantines, “stay-at-home” orders, social distancing guidelines and similar mandates for many individuals to substantially restrict daily activities and for many businesses to curtail or cease normal operations.
In response, we have undertaken a number of actions to help ensure the health and safety of our employees, customers, and building partners and comply with health and safety standards required by governmental authorities. While necessary and appropriate, these actions, together with the unprecedented uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and related factors, impacted our ability to operate our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practices and caused our sales pace to significantly decline, our cancellation rate to significantly increase and our home construction and deliveries in certain of our markets to be delayed commencing in the latter half of March 2020 and continuing through April 2020. Conditions started to improve in May 2020 as state and local governments began to ease public health restrictions and we gradually resumed many of our normal operations and our sales and closings have rebounded significantly since May 2020. However, the potential magnitude and duration of the business and economic impacts from the unprecedented public health effort to contain and combat the spread of COVID-19 are uncertain, and we can provide no assurance that the positive trends we have experienced since May 2020 will continue. In addition, we can provide no assurance that the COVID-19 public health effort will not be intensified to such an extent that we will not be able to conduct any business operations in certain of our markets or at all for an indefinite period, particularly in response to any resurgence in COVID-19 cases, whether due to the spread of variants of the virus or otherwise.
Our business could also be negatively impacted over the medium-to-longer term if the disruptions related to COVID-19 decrease consumer confidence generally or with respect to purchasing a home, cause civil unrest, and/or precipitate a prolonged economic downturn, rise in unemployment and/or tempering of wage growth, any of which could lower demand for our homes and/or impair our ability to sell and build homes in a typical manner or at all, generate revenues and cash flows, and/or access the capital or lending markets (or significantly increase the costs of doing so), as may be necessary to sustain our business; increase the costs or decrease the supply of building materials or the availability of labor and subcontractors; and/or result in us recognizing material charges in future periods for inventory impairments or land option contract abandonments, or both. The unprecedented uncertainty surrounding COVID-19, due, in part, to rapidly changing governmental directives, public health challenges and progress, macroeconomic consequences and market reactions thereto also makes it more challenging for us to estimate the future performance of our business and develop strategies to generate growth and achieve our objectives.
Should the adverse impacts described above (or others that are currently unknown) occur, whether individually or collectively, we could experience, among other things, increases in our cancellation rate and decreases in our new contracts, homes delivered, revenues and profitability, as we experienced in the first several weeks of our second quarter of 2020. Such impacts could be material to our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in 2021 and subsequent reporting periods. We could also be forced to reduce our average selling prices to generate demand or in response to actions taken by our
competitors. In addition, should the COVID-19 public health effort intensify to such an extent that we cannot operate in most or all of our markets, we could generate few or no new contracts and deliver few, if any, homes during the applicable period, which could be prolonged. Also, if there are prolonged government restrictions on our business and customers and/or an extended economic recession, we could be unable to produce revenues and cash flows sufficient to conduct our business, comply with the covenants and other requirements under our Credit Facility, indentures governing our senior notes, mortgage financing arrangements, land contracts due to land sellers and other loans and/or service our outstanding debt. Such a circumstance could, among other things, exhaust our available liquidity and ability to access additional expenses for identifying and training new personnel.liquidity sources and/or trigger an acceleration to pay a significant portion or all of our then-outstanding indebtedness, which we may be unable to do.
| |
Item 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
We own and operate an approximately 85,000 square foot office buildingItem 2.PROPERTIES
On January 30, 2019, we entered into a lease for oura new home office in Columbus, Ohio andOhio. This lease commenced on June 29, 2020. We lease all of our other offices.offices (see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our office leases). Due to the nature of our business, a substantial amount of property is held as inventory in the ordinary course of business. See “Item 1. BUSINESS – Land Acquisition and Development” and “Item 1. BUSINESS – Backlog.”
Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have received claims from homeowners in certain of our Florida communities (and been named as a defendant inCompany’s legal proceedings initiated by certain of such homeowners) related to stucco on their homes. Please refer to are discussed in Note 8 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding these stucco claims.Statements. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in certain other legal proceedings which are incidental to our business. While management currently believes that the ultimate resolution of these other legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows, such legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties. The Company has recorded a liability to provide for the anticipated costs, including legal defense costs, associated with the resolution of these other legal proceedings. However, the possibility exists that the costs to resolve these legal proceedings could differ from the recorded estimates and, therefore, have a material effect on the Company’s net income for the periods in which they are resolved.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II
| |
Item 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for Common Shares and Dividends
The Company’s common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MHO.” As of February 14, 2018,17, 2021, there were approximately 337446 record holders of the Company’s common shares. At that date, there were 29,508,71830,137,141 common shares issued and 27,869,96429,109,685 common shares outstanding.
The table below presents the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common shares during each of the quarters presented:
|
| | | | | | | | |
2017 | | HIGH | | LOW |
| | | | |
First quarter | | $ | 26.63 |
| | $ | 22.55 |
|
Second quarter | | 29.41 |
| | 23.62 |
|
Third quarter | | 28.57 |
| | 24.08 |
|
Fourth quarter | | 36.92 |
| | 26.60 |
|
| | | | |
2016 | | | | |
| | | | |
First quarter | | $ | 21.95 |
| | $ | 15.56 |
|
Second quarter | | 20.54 |
| | 17.00 |
|
Third quarter | | 23.87 |
| | 18.36 |
|
Fourth quarter | | 26.70 |
| | 20.40 |
|
The Company declared and paid a quarterly dividend of $609.375 per share on our 9.75% Series A Preferred Shares (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) for each of the first three quarters of 2017 and for each quarter in 2016 (for aggregate dividend payments of $3.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively). There were no cash dividends declared or paid to common shareholders in 2017 or 2016. On October 16, 2017, the Company redeemed all 2,000 of its outstanding Series A Preferred Shares.
Please see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the restrictions on our ability to pay dividends on, and repurchase, our common shares.
Performance Graph
The following graph illustrates the Company’s performance in the form of cumulative total return to holders of our common shares for the last five calendar years through December 31, 2017,2020, assuming a hypothetical investment of $100 and reinvestment of all dividends paid on such investment, compared to the cumulative total return of the same hypothetical investment in both the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Homebuilding Index.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period Ending |
Index | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 | 12/31/2018 | 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2020 |
M/I Homes, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | | $ | 114.87 | | $ | 156.93 | | $ | 95.89 | | $ | 179.52 | | $ | 202.05 | |
S&P 500 | 100.00 | 111.96 | 136.40 | 130.42 | 171.49 | 203.04 |
S&P 500 Homebuilding Index | 100.00 | 91.21 | 158.11 | 107.11 | 161.53 | 201.08 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period Ending |
Index | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 |
M/I Homes, Inc. | $ | 100.00 |
| $ | 96.04 |
| $ | 86.64 |
| $ | 82.72 |
| $ | 95.02 |
| $ | 129.81 |
|
S&P 500 | 100.00 |
| 132.39 |
| 150.51 |
| 152.59 |
| 170.84 |
| 208.14 |
|
S&P 500 Homebuilding Index | 100.00 |
| 109.40 |
| 121.90 |
| 132.32 |
| 120.69 |
| 209.21 |
|
Share Repurchases
DuringThere were no repurchases made by, or on behalf of, the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of the Company’s common shares during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not repurchase any common shares. Please see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our ability to repurchase our shares.2020.
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company's redemption of its 2,000 Series A Preferred Shares during the three months ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | (d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
October 1, 2017 | 2,000(1) |
| $ | 25,209.896 |
| — |
| — |
|
November 1, 2017 | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
December 1, 2017 | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Total | 2,000 |
| $ | 25,209.896 |
| — |
| — |
|
| |
(1) | On October 16, 2017, the Company redeemed all 2,000 outstanding Series A Preferred Shares (and the 2,000,000 related depository shares), at a redemption price of $25,000 per share plus an amount equal to $209.896 (the amount of the accrued and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not earned or declared) from September 15, 2017 to (but excluding) October 16, 2017), for a total payment of $25,209.896 per share. The Series A Preferred Shares are each represented by 1,000 depositary shares. |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. This table should be read together with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements, including the Notes thereto, contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These historical results may not be indicative of future results.Not applicable.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
Income Statement (Year Ended December 31): | | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 1,961,971 |
| $ | 1,691,327 |
| $ | 1,418,395 |
| $ | 1,215,180 |
| $ | 1,036,782 |
|
Gross margin (a) | $ | 393,268 |
| $ | 329,152 |
| $ | 300,094 |
| $ | 252,732 |
| $ | 206,469 |
|
Income before income taxes (a) (b) | $ | 120,324 |
| $ | 91,785 |
| $ | 86,929 |
| $ | 69,736 |
| $ | 41,335 |
|
Net income (a) (b) (c) (d) | $ | 72,081 |
| $ | 56,609 |
| $ | 51,763 |
| $ | 50,789 |
| $ | 151,423 |
|
Preferred dividends | $ | 3,656 |
| $ | 4,875 |
| $ | 4,875 |
| $ | 4,875 |
| $ | 3,656 |
|
Excess of fair value over book value of preferred shares redeemed | $ | 2,257 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 2,190 |
|
Net income to common shareholders | $ | 66,168 |
| $ | 51,734 |
| $ | 46,888 |
| $ | 45,914 |
| $ | 145,577 |
|
Earnings per share to common shareholders: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Basic: | $ | 2.57 |
| $ | 2.10 |
| $ | 1.91 |
| $ | 1.88 |
| $ | 6.11 |
|
Diluted: | $ | 2.26 |
| $ | 1.84 |
| $ | 1.68 |
| $ | 1.65 |
| $ | 5.24 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Basic | 25,769 |
| 24,666 |
| 24,575 |
| 24,463 |
| 23,822 |
|
Diluted | 30,688 |
| 30,116 |
| 30,047 |
| 29,912 |
| 28,763 |
|
Balance Sheet (December 31): | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Inventory | $ | 1,414,574 |
| $ | 1,215,934 |
| $ | 1,112,042 |
| $ | 918,589 |
| $ | 690,934 |
|
Total assets | $ | 1,864,771 |
| $ | 1,548,511 |
| $ | 1,415,554 |
| $ | 1,205,239 |
| $ | 1,102,104 |
|
Notes payable banks – homebuilding operations | $ | — |
| $ | 40,300 |
| $ | 43,800 |
| $ | 30,000 |
| $ | — |
|
Notes payable banks – financial services operations | $ | 168,195 |
| $ | 152,895 |
| $ | 123,648 |
| $ | 85,379 |
| $ | 80,029 |
|
Notes payable - other | $ | 10,576 |
| $ | 6,415 |
| $ | 8,441 |
| $ | 9,518 |
| $ | 7,790 |
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2017 - net | $ | — |
| $ | 57,093 |
| $ | 56,518 |
| $ | 55,943 |
| $ | 55,369 |
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2018 - net | $ | 86,132 |
| $ | 85,423 |
| $ | 84,714 |
| $ | 84,006 |
| $ | 83,297 |
|
Senior notes - net | $ | 542,831 |
| $ | 295,677 |
| $ | 294,727 |
| $ | 226,099 |
| $ | 225,082 |
|
Shareholders’ equity | $ | 747,298 |
| $ | 654,174 |
| $ | 596,566 |
| $ | 544,295 |
| $ | 492,803 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes pre-tax charges of $8.5 million and $19.4 million for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) taken during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $7.7 million, $4.0 million, $3.6 million, $3.5 million and $5.8 million related to pre-tax impairment charges taken during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
|
| |
(b) | Includes a pre-tax charge of $7.8 million for the loss on early extinguishment of debt taken during the year ended December 31, 2015. |
| |
(c) | Includes $9.3 million ($0.31 per diluted share) and $112.8 million ($3.92 per diluted share) related to the accounting benefit from income taxes associated with the reversal of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
| |
(d) | Includes a non-cash provisional tax expense of approximately $6.5 million ($0.21 per diluted share) related to the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets as a result of the Tax Act enacted in December 2017 for the year ended December 31, 2017. For further information on the impacts of the Tax Act, please see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
M/I Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “we”) is one of the nation’s leading builders of single-family homes, having sold over 105,600127,650 homes since we commencedcommencing homebuilding activities in 1976. The Company’s homes are marketed and sold primarily under the M/I Homes brand (M/I Homes and Showcase Collection (exclusively by M/I)), and the Company also uses the Hans Hagen brand in its Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota market.brand. The Company has homebuilding operations in Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; Indianapolis, Indiana; Chicago, Illinois; Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota; Detroit, Michigan; Tampa, OrlandoSarasota and Sarasota,Orlando, Florida; Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio, Texas; and Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina; and the Virginia and Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C.Carolina.
Included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are the following topics relevant to the Company’s performance and financial condition:
•Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies;
•Results of Operations;
•Discussion of Our Liquidity and Capital Resources;
•Summary of Our Contractual Obligations;
•Discussion of Our Utilization of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements; and
•Impact of Interest Rates and Inflation.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates such estimates and assumptions and makes adjustments as deemed necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates using different estimates and assumptions, or if conditions are significantly different in the future. See “Forward - Looking Statements” above in Part I.
Listed below are those estimates and policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application. Our critical accounting estimates should be read in conjunction with the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue and the related profit from the sale of a home is recognized whenand revenue and the delivery has occurred, title has passed,related profit from the risks and rewardssale of ownership are transferredland to the buyer, and an adequate initial and continuing investment by the homebuyer is received, or when the loan has been sold to a third-party investor. Revenue for homes that close to the buyer having a down payment of 5% or greater, home deliveries financed by third parties and all home deliveries insured under Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), U.S. Veterans Administration (“VA”) and other government-insured programs are recordedrecognized in the financial statements on the date of closing.closing if delivery has occurred, title has passed to the buyer, all performance obligations (as defined below) have been met, and control of the home or land is transferred to the buyer in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for the home or land. If not received immediately upon closing, cash proceeds from home closings are held in escrow for the Company’s benefit, typically for up to three days, and are included in Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
RevenueSales incentives vary by type of incentive and by amount on a community-by-community and home-by-home basis. The costs of any sales incentives in the form of free or discounted products and services provided to homebuyers are reflected in Land and housing costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income because such incentives are identified in our home purchase contracts with homebuyers as an intrinsic part of our single performance obligation to deliver and transfer title to their home for the transaction price stated in the contracts. Sales incentives that we may provide in the form of closing cost allowances are recorded as a reduction of housing revenue at the time the home is delivered.
We record sales commissions within Selling expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income when incurred (i.e., when the home is delivered) as the amortization period is generally one year or less and therefore capitalization is not required as part of the practical expedient for incremental costs of obtaining a contract.
Contract liabilities include customer deposits related to sold but undelivered homes. Substantially all otherof our home deliveries initially funded by our 100%-owned subsidiary, M/I Financial, LLC (“M/I Financial”), issales are scheduled to close and be recorded onto revenue within one year from the date of receiving a customer deposit. Contract liabilities expected to be recognized as revenue, excluding revenue pertaining to contracts that M/I Financial sellshave an original expected duration of one year or less, is not material.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the loancustomer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. All of our home purchase contracts have a third-party investor, becausesingle performance obligation as the receivablepromise to transfer the home is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contract and, therefore, not distinct. Our performance obligation, to deliver the agreed-upon home, is generally satisfied in less than one year from the third-party investororiginal contract date. Deferred revenue resulting from uncompleted performance obligations existing at the time we deliver new homes to our homebuyers is not subjectmaterial.
Although our third party land sale contracts may include multiple performance obligations, the revenue we expect to recognize in any future subordination, andyear related to remaining performance obligations, excluding revenue pertaining to contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less, is not material. We do not disclose the Company has transferred to this investor the usual risks and rewardsvalue of ownership that is in substance aunsatisfied performance obligations for land sale and does not have a substantial continuing involvementcontracts with the home.an original expected duration of one year or less.
We recognize the majority of the revenue associated with our mortgage loan operations when the mortgage loans are sold and/or related servicing rights are sold to third party investors or retained and managed under a third party subservicesub-service arrangement. The revenue recognized is reduced by the fair value of the related guarantee provided to the investor. The fair value of the guarantee is recognized in revenue when the Company is released from its obligation under the guarantee. We recognize financial services revenue associated with our title operations as homes are delivered, closing services are rendered, and title policies are issued, all of which generally occur simultaneously as each home is delivered. All of the underwriting risk associated with title insurance policies is transferred to third-party insurers.
Home Cost of Sales. All associated homebuilding costs are chargedSee Note 1 to cost of sales in the period when theour Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our revenues from home deliveries are recognized. Homebuilding costs include: landdisaggregated by geography and land development costs; home construction costs (including anrevenue source.
estimate of the costs to complete construction); previously capitalized interest; real estate taxes; indirect costs; and estimated warranty costs. All other costs are expensed as incurred. Sales incentives, including pricing discounts and financing costs paid by the Company, are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Sales incentives in the form of options or upgrades are recorded in homebuilding costs.
Inventory. Inventory includes the costs of land acquisition, land development and home construction, capitalized interest, real estate taxes, direct overhead costs incurred during development and home construction, and common costs that benefit the entire community, less impairments, if any. Land acquisition, land development and common costs (both incurred and estimated to be incurred) are typically allocated to individual lots based on the total number of lots expected to be closed in each community or phase, or based on the relative fair value, the relative sales value or the front footage method of each lot. Any changes to the estimated total development costs of a community or phase are allocated proportionately to the homes remaining in the community or phase and homes previously closed. The cost of individual lots is transferred to homes under construction when home construction begins. Home construction costs are accumulated on a specific identification basis. Costs of home deliveries include the specific construction cost of the home and the allocated lot costs. Such costs are charged to cost of sales simultaneously with revenue recognition, as discussed above. When a home is closed, we typically have not yet paid all incurred costs necessary to complete the home. As homes close, we compare the home construction budget to actual recorded costs to date to estimate the additional costs to be incurred from our subcontractors related to the home. We record a liability and a corresponding charge to cost of sales for the amount we estimate will ultimately be paid related to that home. We monitor the accuracy of such estimates by comparing actual costs incurred in subsequent months to the estimate. Although actual costs to complete a home in the future could differ from our estimates, our method has historically produced consistently accurate estimates of actual costs to complete closed homes.
Inventory is recorded at cost, unless events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the land is impaired, at which point the inventory is written down to fair value as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”). The Company assesses inventory for recoverability on a quarterly basis if events or changes in local or national economic conditions indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In conducting our quarterly review for indicators of impairment on a community level, we evaluate, among other things, margins on sales contracts in backlog, the margins on homes that have been delivered, expected changes in margins with regard to future home sales over the life of the community, expected changes in margins with regard to future land sales, the value of the land itself as well as any results from third-party appraisals. From the review of all of these factors, we identify communities whose carrying values may exceed their estimated undiscounted future cash flows and run a test for recoverability. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the estimated undiscounted future cash flows and which are deemed to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the communities exceeds the estimated fair value. Due to the fact that the Company’s cash flow models and estimates of fair values are based upon management estimates and assumptions, unexpected changes in market conditions and/or changes in management’s intentions with respect to the inventory may lead the Company to incur additional impairment charges in the future. Because each inventory asset is unique, there are numerous inputs and assumptions used in our valuation techniques, including estimated average selling price, construction and development costs, absorption pace (reflecting any product mix change strategies implemented or to be implemented), selling strategies, alternative land uses (including disposition of all or a portion of the land owned), or discount rates, which could materially impact future cash flow and fair value estimates.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, our projections generally assume a gradual improvement in market conditions. If communities are not recoverable based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. The fair value of a community is estimated by discounting management’s cash flow projections using an appropriate risk-adjusted interest rate. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we utilized discount rates ranging from 13% to 16% in our valuations. The discount rate used in determining each asset’s estimated fair value reflects the inherent risks associated with the related estimated cash flow stream, as well as current risk-free rates available in the market and estimated market risk premiums.
Our quarterly assessments reflect management’s best estimates. Due to the inherent uncertainties in management’s estimates and uncertainties related to our operations and our industry as a whole as further discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are unable to determine at this time if and to what extent continuing future impairments will occur. Additionally, due to the volume of possible outcomes that can be generated from changes in the various model inputs for each community, we do not believe it is possible to create a sensitivity analysis that can provide meaningful information for the users of our financial statements.
Land Option or Purchase Agreements. In accordance with ASC 810-10, Consolidation (“ASC 810”), we analyze our land option or purchase agreements to determine whether the corresponding land seller is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary (using an analysis similar to that described in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements within the description of our significant accounting policy for VIEs). Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land,
ASC 810 requires a company to consolidate a VIE if the company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. In cases where we are the primary beneficiary, even though we do not have title to such land, we are required to consolidate these purchase/option agreements and reflect such assets and liabilities as Consolidated Inventory Not Owned on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, we have concluded that we were not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs from which we are purchasing under land option or purchase agreements. Please see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements and the “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section below for additional information related to our off-balance-sheet arrangements.Warranty Reserves. We record warranty reserves to cover our exposure to the costs for materials and labor not expected to be covered by our subcontractors to the extent they relate to warranty-type claims. Warranty reserves are established by charging cost of sales and crediting a warranty reserve for each home delivered. The warranty reserves for the Company’s Home Builder’s Limited Warranty (“HBLW”) are established as a percentage of average sales price and adjusted based on historical payment patterns determined, generally, by geographic area and recent trends. Factors that are given consideration in determining the HBLW reserves include: (1) the historical range of amounts paid per average sales price on a home; (2) type and mix of amenity packages added to the home; (3) any warranty expenditures not considered to be normal and recurring; (4) timing of payments; (5) improvements in quality of construction expected to impact future warranty expenditures; and (6) conditions that may affect certain projects and require a different percentage of average sales price for those specific projects. Changes in estimates for warranties occur due to changes in the historical payment experience and differences between the actual payment pattern experienced during the period and the historical payment pattern used in our evaluation of the warranty reserve balance at the end of each quarter. Actual future warranty costs could differ from our current estimated amount.
Our warranty reserves for our 30-year (offered on all homes sold after April 25, 1998 and on or before December 1, 2015 in all of our markets except our Texas markets), 15-year (offered on all homes sold after December 1, 2015 in all of our markets except our Texas markets) orand 10-year (offered on all homes sold in our Texas markets) transferable structural warranty programs are established on a per-unit basis. While the structural warranty reserve is recorded as each house is delivered, the sufficiency of the structural warranty per unit charge and total reserve is reevaluated on an annual basis, with the assistance of an actuary, using our own historical data and trends, as well as industry-wide historical data and trends, and other project specific factors. The reserves are also evaluated quarterly and adjusted if we encounter activity that is not consistentinconsistent with the historical experience used in the annual analysis. These reserves are subject to variability due to uncertainties regarding structural defect claims for products we build, the markets in which we build, claim settlement history, insurance and legal interpretations, among other factors.
Our warranty reserve amounts are based upon historical experience and geographic location. While we believe that our warranty reserves are sufficient to cover our projected costs, there can be no assurances that historical data and trends will accurately predict our actual warranty costs. Our warranty reserves have been adversely affected by stucco-related repairs in certain of our Florida communities in each of 2016 and 2017. Please see See Note 1 and Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our warranty reserves. Self-insurance Reserves. Self-insurance reserves are made for estimated liabilities associated with employee health care, workers’ compensation, and general liability insurance. The reserves related to employee health care and workers’ compensation are based on historical experience and open case reserves. Our workers’ compensation claims and our general liability claims are insured by a third party, except for workers compensation claims made in the State of Ohio where the Company is self-insured. The Company records a reserve for general liability claims falling below the Company’s deductible. The reserve estimate is based on an actuarial evaluation of our past history of general liability claims, other industry specific factors and specific event analysis. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated accrual amounts, actual future costs could differ from our current estimated amounts. Please see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our self-insurance reserves.Stock-Based Compensation. We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grant of equity-based awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which generally requires that companies measure and recognize stock-based compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based awards granted under compensation arrangements over the related vesting period. As discussed further in Notes 1 and 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we have granted share-based awards to certain of our employees and directors in the form of stock options, director stock units and performance share units (“PSU’s”).Determining the fair value of share-based awards requires judgment to identify the appropriate valuation model and develop the assumptions. The grant date fair value for stock option awards and PSU’s with a market condition (as defined in ASC 718) is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulation methodology, respectively. The grant date fair value for the director stock units and PSU’s with a performance condition (as defined in ASC 718) is based upon the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant. We recognize stock-based compensation expense for our stock option awards and PSU’s with a market condition over the requisite service period of the award while stock-based compensation expense for our director stock units, which vest immediately, is fully recognized in the period of the award. For the portion of the PSU’s
awarded subject to the satisfaction of a performance condition, we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period based on the probable outcome of the related performance condition. If satisfaction of the performance condition is not probable, compensation expense recognition is deferred until probability is attained and a cumulative stock-based compensation expense adjustment is recorded and recognized ratably over the remaining service period. The Company reevaluates the probability of the satisfaction of the performance condition on a quarterly basis, and stock-based compensation expense is adjusted based on the portion of the requisite service period that has passed. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be higher and have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Please see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our stock-based compensation.Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets. The Company records income taxes under the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on future tax consequences attributable to (1) temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and (2) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, if applicable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the change is enacted. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Tax Act was passed which resulted in a non-cash provisional tax expense of approximately $6.5 million related to the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets. Please see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.In accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets, including the benefit from net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credit carryforwards, to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that all or any portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required. Please see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our valuation of deferred tax assets. We have no valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets and state NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2016.Segment Reporting. The application of segment reporting requires significant judgment in determining our operating segments. Operating segments are defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the Company’s chief operating decision makers to evaluate performance, make operating decisions and determine how to allocate resources. The Company’s chief operating decision makers evaluate the Company’s performance in various ways, including: (1) the results of our 15 individual homebuilding operating segments and the results of our financial services operations; (2) the results of our three homebuilding reportable segments; and (3) our consolidated financial results.
In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), we have identified each homebuilding division as an operating segment as each homebuilding division engages in business activities from which it earns revenue, primarily from the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached homes, acquisition and development of land, and the occasional sale of lots to third parties. Our financial services operations generate revenue primarily from the origination, sale and servicing of mortgage loans and title services primarily for purchasers of the Company’s homes and are included in our financial services reportable segment. Corporate is a non-operating segment that develops and implements strategic initiatives and supports our operating segments by centralizing key administrative functions such as accounting, finance, treasury, information technology, insurance and risk management, litigation, marketing and human resources.
In accordance with the aggregation criteria defined in ASC 280, we have determined our reportable segments are as follows: Midwest homebuilding, Southern homebuilding, Mid-Atlantic homebuilding and financial services operations. The homebuilding operating segments included in each reportable segment have been aggregated because they share similar aggregation characteristics as prescribed in ASC 280 in the following regards: (1) long-term economic characteristics; (2) historical and expected future long-term gross margin percentages; (3) housing products, production processes and methods of distribution; and (4) geographical proximity. We may, however, be required to reclassify our reportable segments if markets that currently are being aggregated do not continue to share these aggregation characteristics which are evaluated annually.
The homebuilding operating segments that comprise each of our reportable segments are as follows:
|
| | |
Midwest | Southern | Mid-Atlantic |
Chicago, Illinois | Orlando, Florida | Charlotte, North Carolina |
Cincinnati, Ohio | Sarasota, Florida | Raleigh, North Carolina |
Columbus, Ohio | Tampa, Florida | Washington, D.C. |
Indianapolis, Indiana | Austin, Texas | |
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota | Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas | |
| Houston, Texas | |
| San Antonio, Texas | |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we achieved record levels of new contracts, homes delivered, revenue and revenue.income before income taxes. We also achieved record levels of backlog sales value at December 31, 2020. Our improved profitability is attributable primarily to the increase in homes delivered, improved margins and overhead leverage. Additionally, our complementary financial services business also achieved record resultsrevenue and income before income taxes, and originated a record number of loans in 2017. Conditions2020, while benefiting from a higher margin per loan throughout the year.
Following a substantial decline in mostnew contracts in the latter half of March and April as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced a sharp recovery and an increase in sales activity commencing in May as pandemic-related restrictions began to ease. This trend of increasing sales volume continued through our markets remained steady with modest improvementthird and fourth quarters, resulting in demandthe Company achieving a record for new homes comparedcontracts in 2020, along with records in a number of other operating and financial metrics described below. We believe that the same period in 2016, supported by favorable fundamentals, including improved levels of household formation, continued increases in employment, lowhomebuilding industry benefited from record-low interest rates, improved consumer confidencea continued undersupply of available homes and continued mortgage availability, along with a constrained supplydesire of both existingmany consumers to move from rental apartments and new homes. These conditions,densely populated areas to single family homes in suburban locations. We believe these factors will continue to support demand into 2021, subject to the continued execution of our strategic business initiatives and strong performance in our financial services business enabled us to achieveeconomic uncertainties caused by the continuing COVID-19 pandemic as well as higher unemployment levels.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we achieved the following improved Companyrecord results in comparison to the year ended December 31, 2016:2019:
•New contracts increased 11%39% to 5,2999,427 contracts - a record high for our Company
•Homes delivered increased 14%22% to 5,0897,709 homes - a record high for our Company
Average price of homes delivered increased 3% to $369,000
Number of homes in backlog increased 12%, and our total•Total sales value in backlog increased 15%74% to $791 million
Average sales price of homes in backlog increased 3% to $393,000$1.84 billion - a year-end record high for our Company
•Revenue increased 16%22% to $1.96$3.05 billion - a record high for our Company
Number of active communities at December 31, 2017•Income before income taxes increased 6%87% to 188$310.0 million - a record high for our Company
In addition to the record results described above, our number of homes in backlog increased 64%, and we achieved net income of $239.9 million in 2020, an 88% increase from the prior year. Our financial services operations also achieved record income before income taxes in 2020, benefiting from an increase in homes closed, the number of mortgages originated and higher margins, as well as technology enabled efficiencies. Our company-wide absorption pace of sales per community in 2020 improved to 3.7 per month compared to 2.6 per month in 2019. Partially as a result of this accelerated sales pace, we sold out of some communities earlier and our number of active communities declined to 202 at the end of 2020 from 225 at the end of 2019. We continued to place additional land under contract for communities that will be brought online in future periods, and controlled approximately 39,500 lots at December 31, 2020. Our ability to timely replace existing communities could further impact our number of active communities. We continue to work to open new communities, and we are also actively managing sales pace, in part by selectively increasing prices, to better match our availability of lots and production schedule.
Summary of Company Financial Results in 2020
The calculations of adjusted income before income taxes, adjusted net income, and adjusted housing gross margin, each of which is a non-GAAP measure, are described and reconciled to income before income taxes, net income, and housing gross margin, respectively, which represent the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Income before income taxes for the twelve months ended December 31, 20172020 increased 31%87% from $91.8$166.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20162019 to $120.3$310.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Income before income taxes for 20172020 was unfavorably impacted by an $8.5asset impairment charges of $8.4 million charge forand $0.9 million of stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed below and in NoteNote 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) and asset impairment charges of $7.7 million.. Income before income taxes for 20162019 was unfavorably impacted by a $19.4 million charge for stucco-related repair costs and asset impairment charges of $4.0 million.$5.0 million and $0.6 million of acquisition-related charges as a result of our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes in March 2018. Excluding stucco-related and impairmentthese charges in both 20172020 and 2016,2019, adjusted income before income taxes increased 19%86% from $115.2$171.7 million in 20162019 to $136.5$319.3 million in 2017.2020.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed the following with respect to our capital structure:
issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”) for net proceeds of approximately $246 million;
issued approximately 2.4 million common shares upon the conversion of all $57.5 million aggregate principal amount of our then outstanding 3.25% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes”); and
redeemed all 2,000 of our then outstanding 9.75% Series A Preferred Shares (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) (and the 2,000,000 related depositary shares) on October 16, 2017 (for $50.4 million), and recorded a $2.3 million non-cash equity charge in connection therewith.
Each of the above actions is more fully described in the footnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements and below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
The calculations of adjusted income before income taxes, adjusted housing gross margin and adjusted net income to common shareholders (referred to below), which we believe provide a clearer measure of the ongoing performance of our business, are described and reconciled to income before income taxes, housing gross margin and net income to common shareholders, the financial measures that are calculated using our GAAP results, below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Summary of Company Financial Results in 2017
In 2017,2020, we achieved net income to common shareholders of $66.2$239.9 million, or $2.26$8.23 per diluted share, which includes a non-cash provisional tax expensethe after-tax impact of approximately $6.5 million related toboth the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets as a result of the Tax Act, a $2.3 million non-cash equity charge resulting from the excess of fair value over carrying value of our Series A Preferred Shares that were called for redemption in the third quarter of 2017,asset impairment charges and $3.7 million in dividend payments made to holders of our then outstanding Series A Preferred Shares. This comparesstucco-related charges noted above ($0.22 and $0.02 per diluted share, respectively), compared to net income to common shareholders of $51.7$127.6 million, or $1.84$4.48 per diluted share in 2016,2019, which includes $4.9 million in dividend payments made to holders of our Series A Preferred Shares in the period. Excluding the impact of the deferred tax asset re-measurement and the equity adjustment related to the redemption of our Series A Preferred Shares in 2017, as well as after-tax impact of both the asset impairment charges and stucco-relatedthe acquisition-related charges takennoted above ($0.13 and $0.02 per diluted share, respectively). Excluding these charges in both 2017 and 2016 (as discussed above),periods, adjusted net income increased 87% from $131.9 million ($4.63 per diluted share) in 2019 to common shareholders increased 29% from $66.2$246.9 million ($8.47 per diluted share) in 20162020. Our effective tax rate was 22.6% in 2020 compared to $85.3 million23.2% in 2017.2019.
In 2017,2020, we recorded record total revenue of $1.96$3.05 billion, of which $1.88$2.94 billion was from homes delivered, $33.7$19.2 million was from land sales, and $49.7$87.0 million was from our financial services operations. Revenue from homes delivered increased 17%21% from 20162019 driven primarily by the 6071,413 additional homes delivered in 20172020 (a 14%22% increase) and the 3% increase, offset, in part, by a 1% decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered in 2017 ($10,0003,000 per home delivered) compared to 2016., which was primarily the result of the mix of homes delivered. Revenue from land sales decreased $5.1$5.4 million from 20162019 due primarily to fewer land sales in our Southern region in the current year compared to the prior year. Revenue from our financial services segment increased 18%57% to $49.7$87.0 million in 20172020 as a result of increasesan increase in loans closed and sold during the number of loan originations, increasesyear, in the average loan amount, the sale of a portion of the servicing portfolio, aaddition to higher volume ofmargins on loans sold and more favorable market conditions induring the first half ofperiod compared to the prior year.
Total gross margin (total revenue less total land and housing costs) increased $64.1$186.9 million in 20172020 compared to 20162019 as a result of a $56.4$155.2 million improvement in the gross margin of our homebuilding operations (the sum of housing gross margin and land gross margin) and a $7.7$31.7 million improvement in the gross margin of our financial services operations. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our gross margin on homes delivered (housing gross margin) improved $57.7$154.7 million, due to the 14%22% increase in the number of homes delivered, the 3%offset partially by an increase in the average sales price of homes delivered and a decline of $10.9$3.4 million in stucco-related repair charges, partially offset by a $3.7 million increase in asset impairment charges. Our housing gross margin percentage improved 50210 basis points from 17.6%17.9% in the prior year to 18.1%20.0% in 2017.2020. Exclusive of the stucco-related andasset impairment charges and stucco-related repair charges in both years,2020, and the asset impairment charges and acquisition-related charges in 2019, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage remained flat at 19.0%improved from 18.1% in both 2017 and 2016.2019 to 20.3% in 2020 as a result of the mix of homes delivered during the period. Our gross margin on land sales (land gross margin) declined $1.3improved $0.5 million in 20172020 compared to 20162019 as a result of fewer land salesthe mix of lots sold in the current year compared to the prior year. The gross margin of our financial services operations increased $31.7 million in 2020 compared to 2019 as a result of increases in the number of loan originations, in addition to higher margins on loans sold during the period, mainly due to a favorable pricing environment.
We believe the increased sales volume and higher sales prices on homes delivered in 2017 were driven primarily by better pricing leverage in select locations and submarkets and shifts in both product and community mix. In addition, our new contracts benefited from the opening of 67opened 69 new communities during 2017.2020. We sell a variety of home types in various communities and markets, each of which yields a different gross margin. The timing of the openings of new replacement communities as well as underlying lot costs varies from year to year. As a result, our new contracts and housing gross margin may fluctuate up or down from year to year depending on the mix of communities delivering homes. The pricing improvements described above were partially offset by higher average lot and construction costs relatedDue to homebuilding industry conditions and normal supply andthe increase in demand dynamics. In 2017, we were able to pass a portion of the higher construction and lot costs to our homebuyers in the form of higher sales prices. However, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be ablehave experienced since May 2020, we are selling through communities faster; therefore, our ability to continuereplace existing communities timely could impact our ability to raise prices.meet current demand and negatively impact recent growth trends in our number of active communities.
For 2017,2020, selling, general and administrative expense increased $34.2$54.7 million, and remained flat as a percentage of revenue at 13.0%which partially offset the increase in both 2017 and 2016. Selling expense increased $19.5 million from 2016 and increased slightlyour gross margin discussed above, but declined as a percentage of revenue to 6.5%11.7% in 2017 compared2020 from 12.1% in 2019. Selling expense increased $25.1 million from 2019 and improved as a percentage of revenue to 6.4% for 2016.5.9% in 2020 from 6.2% in 2019. Variable selling expense for sales commissions contributed $11.4$24.5 million to the increase due to the higher average sales pricenumber of homes delivered during the period, and higher number of homes delivered. The increase in selling expensethe remainder was also attributable to an $8.1 million increase in non-variable selling expense primarily related to costs associated with our sales offices and models as a result of our increased average community count, a $2.7 million increase in advertising expenses ($1.2 million of which is related to the launch of our “Welcome to Better” re-branding campaign, as described more fully in the “Business” section above), and a $0.7 million increase related to start-up costs associated with our new Sarasota division.expense. General and administrative expense increased $14.7$29.6 million compared to 20162019 but declined as a percentage of revenue from 6.6%5.9% in 20162019 to 6.4%5.8% in 2017. This2020. The dollar increase in general and administrative expense was primarily resulted fromdue to a $7.0$15.2 million increase in compensation expensecompensation-related expenses due to anour increased headcount and strong financial performance which led to higher incentive-based compensation, a $2.6 million increase in employee count as well as higher incentive and share-based compensation due to improved operating results, a $3.6 million increase in land relatedland-related expenses, a $1.4 million increase related to start-up costs associated with our Sarasota division, a $1.2$2.4 million increase in costs associated with new information systems, a $0.5$1.4 million increase in charitable contributions, andcorporate home office rent-related expenses, a $1.4 million increase in professional fees, a $1.2 million increase in COVID-19-related cleaning expenses, a $1.0 million increase in otherrent related to our division offices, a $0.8 million increase in advertising expenses, and a $3.6 million increase in miscellaneous expenses.
Outlook
We believe that housing industry fundamentals are solid and that continued growth in employment, modest wage growth, historically lownew home sales will continue to benefit from record-low interest rates, (despite recenta continued undersupply of available homes and consumer demographics, including a growing number of homebuyers moving from rental apartments and more densely populated areas to single family homes in suburban locations. However, we also expect that overall economic conditions in the United States will continue to be negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The extent to which these matters will impact the U.S. economy and level of employment, capital markets, secondary mortgage markets, consumer confidence and availability of mortgage loans to homebuyers, and therefore our operational and financial performance, is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
In addition, in the latter part of 2020, we experienced cost increases in rates)certain construction materials, particularly lumber, and growing consumer confidenceare actively managing and monitoring those costs. We have been able to raise home prices in many of our communities to offset these cost increases and preserve or increase our margins. During the second half of 2020, our ability to raise prices, together with cost management, enabled us to achieve a total gross margin percentage of 22.2% for 2020, an improvement of 260 basis points compared to 2019. We may experience future shortages in materials and labor as well as price increases for materials and labor and may not be able to maintain our current level of direct construction costs as a percentage of average sales price. We remain sensitive to changes in market conditions, and continue to focus on controlling overhead leverage and carefully managing our investment in land and land development spending.
Also due to strong overall housing demand, we have experienced periodic disruptions in our supply chain, including the availability of skilled labor and the timely availability of certain finishing products such as cabinets and appliances which have lengthened the production cycles in certain markets. In 2020, we were able to manage through these disruptions but we cannot predict whether any widespread supply chain disruptions will leadoccur in 2021 or the extent to improved levels of household formation and modest improvement in demand for new homes in 2018. We also expect the recently enacted Tax Act to have a positive impact onwhich any such disruptions will affect our business as a result of higher net income levels for some prospective home buyersin 2021.
We are also closely monitoring mortgage availability and a generally stimulative effect on job creationlending standards. Interest rates remain low, and the U.S. economy.decline in mortgage availability and tightening of underwriting standards that we experienced in March 2020 have eased. This tightening did not significantly impact our business during 2020, but it did require us to adjust our deliveries of lower credit quality loans. We adjusted our pre-closing documentation timeframes based on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and government agency recommendations.
We remain focused on increasing our profitability by generating additional revenue and improving overhead operating leverage, continuing to expand our market share, and investing in attractive land opportunities.
We expect to continue to emphasize the following strategic business objectives in 2018:2021:
profitably growing•managing our presence in our existing markets, includingland spend and inventory levels;
•accelerating the opening of new communities;communities wherever possible;
reviewing new markets for investment opportunities;
•maintaining a strong balance sheet;sheet and liquidity levels;
•expanding the availability of our more affordable Smart Series homes; and
•emphasizing customer service, product quality and design, and premier locations.
Consistent with these objectives,During 2020, we took a number of steps in 2017 for continued improvement in our financial and operating results in 2018 and beyond, including investing $328.2invested $415.0 million in land acquisitions and $200.7$318.3 million in land development in 2017development. We continue to help growclosely review all of our presence in our existing markets. We currently estimate that we will spend approximately $550 million to $600 million on land purchasesacquisition and land development in 2018. However, land transactions are subject to a number of factors, including our financial conditionspending and market conditions, as well as satisfaction of various conditions related to specific properties. We will continue to monitor market conditions and our ongoing pace of home sales and deliveries, including any potential effects as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we will adjust our land and inventory home investment spend accordingly. As a result of the uncertainty of the magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are not providing land spending accordingly.estimates for 2021 at this time.
Due to the uncertainty of the current environment, and the unknown effects on the specific timing of opening and closing out communities, we are not providing estimated community count information for 2021 at this time. However, as a result of our accelerated pace of home sales, we are selling through communities at a faster pace, which will make it challenging to increase our number of active communities in 2021. We ended 20172020 with more than 28,500approximately 39,500 lots under control, which represents a 5.65.1 year supply of lots based on 20172020 homes delivered, including certain lots that we anticipate selling to third parties. This represents a 24%19% increase from our approximately 23,00033,300 lots under control at the end of 2016.2019. We also opened 6769 communities and closed 5792 communities in 2017,2020, ending the year with a total of 188 communities. In 2018, we estimate that202 communities, compared to 225 at the end of 2019. Of our average community count will increase by 10% fromtotal communities at the end of 2020, 62 offered our average community count of 183 communitiesmore affordable Smart Series designs, which are primarily designed for 2017.first-time homebuyers.
Going forward, weWe believe our abilitiesability to leveragedesign and develop attractive homes in desirable locations at an affordable cost, and to grow our business while also leveraging our fixed costs, obtain land at desired rates of return,has enabled us to maintain and open and grow our active communities provide our best opportunities for continuing to improve our strong financial results. However,We further believe that we can provide no assuranceare well positioned with a strong balance sheet to manage through the current economic environment.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for further information regarding the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Segment Reporting
We have determined our reportable segments are: Northern homebuilding; Southern homebuilding; and financial services operations. The homebuilding operating segments that the positive trends reflected incomprise each of our financial and operating metrics will continue in the future.reportable segments are as follows:
| | | | | | |
Northern | Southern | |
Chicago, Illinois | Orlando, Florida | |
Cincinnati, Ohio | Sarasota, Florida | |
Columbus, Ohio | Tampa, Florida | |
Indianapolis, Indiana | Austin, Texas | |
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota | Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas | |
Detroit, Michigan | Houston, Texas | |
| San Antonio, Texas | |
| Charlotte, North Carolina | |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | |
| | |
The following table shows, by segment: revenue; gross margin; selling, general and administrative expense; operating income (loss); interest expense; and depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended |
(In thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Revenue: | | | | | |
Northern homebuilding | $ | 1,256,405 | | | $ | 1,027,291 | | | $ | 933,119 | |
Southern homebuilding | 1,702,727 | | | 1,417,676 | | | 1,300,967 | |
Financial services (a) | 87,013 | | | 55,323 | | | 52,196 | |
Total revenue | $ | 3,046,145 | | | $ | 2,500,290 | | | $ | 2,286,282 | |
| | | | | |
Gross margin: | | | | | |
Northern homebuilding (b) | $ | 232,915 | | | $ | 182,887 | | | $ | 165,187 | |
Southern homebuilding (c) | 356,415 | | | 251,217 | | | 226,386 | |
Financial services (a) | 87,013 | | | 55,323 | | | 52,196 | |
Total gross margin (b) (c) (d) | $ | 676,343 | | | $ | 489,427 | | | $ | 443,769 | |
| | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense: | | | | | |
Northern homebuilding | $ | 107,327 | | | $ | 86,648 | | | $ | 79,056 | |
Southern homebuilding | 153,854 | | | 136,135 | | | 130,474 | |
Financial services (a) | 33,618 | | | 27,973 | | | 24,714 | |
Corporate | 62,283 | | | 51,582 | | | 46,364 | |
Total selling, general and administrative expense | $ | 357,082 | | | $ | 302,338 | | | $ | 280,608 | |
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss): | | | | | |
Northern homebuilding (b) | $ | 125,588 | | | $ | 96,239 | | | $ | 86,131 | |
Southern homebuilding (c) | 202,561 | | | 115,082 | | | 95,912 | |
Financial services (a) | 53,395 | | | 27,350 | | | 27,482 | |
Less: Corporate selling, general and administrative expense | (62,283) | | | (51,582) | | | (46,364) | |
Total operating income (b) (c) (d) | $ | 319,261 | | | $ | 187,089 | | | $ | 163,161 | |
| | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | |
Northern homebuilding | $ | 2,465 | | | $ | 7,474 | | | $ | 7,142 | |
Southern homebuilding | 4,292 | | | 10,250 | | | 10,073 | |
Financial services (a) | 2,927 | | | 3,651 | | | 3,269 | |
Total interest expense | $ | 9,684 | | | $ | 21,375 | | | $ | 20,484 | |
| | | | | |
Equity in income from joint venture arrangements | $ | (466) | | | $ | (311) | | | $ | (312) | |
Acquisition and integration costs (e) | — | | | — | | | 1,700 | |
| | | | | |
Income before income taxes | $ | 310,043 | | | $ | 166,025 | | | $ | 141,289 | |
| | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization: | | | | | |
Northern homebuilding | $ | 3,342 | | | $ | 2,944 | | | $ | 2,448 | |
Southern homebuilding | 4,468 | | | 4,778 | | | 4,472 | |
Financial services | 3,034 | | | 2,095 | | | 1,281 | |
Corporate | 6,734 | | | 6,133 | | | 6,330 | |
Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 17,578 | | | $ | 15,950 | | | $ | 14,531 | |
(a)Our financial services operational results should be viewed in connection with our homebuilding business as its operations originate loans and provide title services primarily for our homebuyers, with the exception of a small amount of mortgage refinancing.
(b)Includes $0.6 million and $5.1 million of acquisition-related charges taken during 2019 and 2018, respectively, as a result of our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes in Detroit, Michigan on March 1, 2018.
(c)The year ended December 31, 2020 includes a $0.9 million net charge for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed below and in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). (d)For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, total gross margin and total operating income were reduced by $8.4 million, $5.0 million and $5.8 million, respectively, related to asset impairment charges taken during the period.
(e)Represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, and miscellaneous expenses related to our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes. As these costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended |
(In thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Revenue: | | | | | |
Midwest homebuilding | $ | 742,577 |
| | $ | 637,894 |
| | $ | 500,873 |
|
Southern homebuilding | 730,482 |
| | 602,273 |
| | 514,747 |
|
Mid-Atlantic homebuilding | 439,219 |
| | 409,149 |
| | 366,800 |
|
Financial services (a) | 49,693 |
| | 42,011 |
| | 35,975 |
|
Total revenue | $ | 1,961,971 |
| | $ | 1,691,327 |
| | $ | 1,418,395 |
|
| | | | | |
Gross margin: | | | | | |
Midwest homebuilding | $ | 149,080 |
| | $ | 126,675 |
| | $ | 96,527 |
|
Southern homebuilding (b) | 119,719 |
| | 87,815 |
| | 104,168 |
|
Mid-Atlantic homebuilding | 74,776 |
| | 72,651 |
| | 63,424 |
|
Financial services (a) | 49,693 |
| | 42,011 |
| | 35,975 |
|
Total gross margin (b) (c) | $ | 393,268 |
| | $ | 329,152 |
| | $ | 300,094 |
|
| | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense: | | | | | |
Midwest homebuilding | $ | 67,558 |
| | $ | 56,229 |
| | $ | 45,091 |
|
Southern homebuilding | 82,921 |
| | 67,417 |
| | 56,892 |
|
Mid-Atlantic homebuilding | 39,178 |
| | 39,201 |
| | 38,280 |
|
Financial services (a) | 22,405 |
| | 18,749 |
| | 14,943 |
|
Corporate | 42,547 |
| | 38,813 |
| | 33,094 |
|
Total selling, general and administrative expense | $ | 254,609 |
| | $ | 220,409 |
| | $ | 188,300 |
|
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss): | | | | | |
Midwest homebuilding | $ | 81,522 |
| | $ | 70,446 |
| | $ | 51,436 |
|
Southern homebuilding (b) | 36,798 |
| | 20,398 |
| | 47,276 |
|
Mid-Atlantic homebuilding | 35,598 |
| | 33,450 |
| | 25,144 |
|
Financial services (a) | 27,288 |
| | 23,262 |
| | 21,032 |
|
Less: Corporate selling, general and administrative expense | (42,547 | ) | | (38,813 | ) | | (33,094 | ) |
Total operating income (b) (c) | $ | 138,659 |
| | $ | 108,743 |
| | $ | 111,794 |
|
| | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | |
Midwest homebuilding | $ | 5,010 |
| | $ | 3,754 |
| | $ | 4,005 |
|
Southern homebuilding | 8,508 |
| | 8,039 |
| | 7,244 |
|
Mid-Atlantic homebuilding | 2,599 |
| | 3,693 |
| | 4,656 |
|
Financial services (a) | 2,757 |
| | 2,112 |
| | 1,616 |
|
Total interest expense | $ | 18,874 |
| | $ | 17,598 |
| | $ | 17,521 |
|
| | | | | |
Equity in income of joint venture arrangements | $ | (539 | ) | | $ | (640 | ) | | $ | (498 | ) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | — |
| | 7,842 |
|
| | | | | |
Income before income taxes | $ | 120,324 |
| | $ | 91,785 |
| | $ | 86,929 |
|
| | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization: | |
| | |
| | |
|
Midwest homebuilding | $ | 2,069 |
| | $ | 1,752 |
| | $ | 1,614 |
|
Southern homebuilding | 3,014 |
| | 2,525 |
| | 2,069 |
|
Mid-Atlantic homebuilding | 1,565 |
| | 1,645 |
| | 1,464 |
|
Financial services | 1,503 |
| | 1,948 |
| | 1,213 |
|
Corporate | 6,023 |
| | 5,736 |
| | 4,568 |
|
Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 14,174 |
| | $ | 13,606 |
| | $ | 10,928 |
|
| |
(a) | Our financial services operational results should be viewed in connection with our homebuilding business as its operations originate loans and provide title services primarily for our homebuying customers, with the exception of a small amount of mortgage refinancing. |
| |
(b) | The years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include an $8.5 million and a $19.4 million charge, respectively, for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed below and in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| |
(c) | For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, total gross margin and total operating income were reduced by $7.7 million, $4.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to asset impairment charges taken during the period. |
The following tables show total assets by segment at December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, 2020 |
(In thousands) | Northern | | Southern | | Corporate, Financial Services and Unallocated | | Total |
Deposits on real estate under option or contract | $ | 5,031 | | | $ | 40,326 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 45,357 | |
Inventory (a) | 847,524 | | | 1,023,727 | | | — | | | 1,871,251 | |
Investments in joint venture arrangements | 1,378 | | | 33,295 | | | — | | | 34,673 | |
Other assets | 37,465 | | | 57,588 | | (b) | 596,711 | | | 691,764 | |
Total assets | $ | 891,398 | | | $ | 1,154,936 | | | $ | 596,711 | | | $ | 2,643,045 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, 2019 |
(In thousands) | Northern | | Southern | | Corporate, Financial Services and Unallocated | | Total |
Deposits on real estate under option or contract | $ | 3,655 | | | $ | 24,877 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 28,532 | |
Inventory (a) | 783,972 | | | 957,003 | | | — | | | 1,740,975 | |
Investments in joint venture arrangements | 1,672 | | | 36,213 | | | — | | | 37,885 | |
Other assets | 21,564 | | | 52,662 | | (b) | 223,976 | |
| 298,202 | |
Total assets | $ | 810,863 | | | $ | 1,070,755 | | | $ | 223,976 | | | $ | 2,105,594 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, 2018 |
(In thousands) | Northern | | Southern | | Corporate, Financial Services and Unallocated | | Total |
Deposits on real estate under option or contract | $ | 5,725 | | | $ | 27,937 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,662 | |
Inventory (a) | 696,057 | | | 944,741 | | | — | | | 1,640,798 | |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 1,562 | | | 34,308 | | | — | | | 35,870 | |
Other assets | 19,524 | | | 43,086 | | (b) | 248,641 | | | 311,251 | |
Total assets | $ | 722,868 | | | $ | 1,050,072 | | | $ | 248,641 | | | $ | 2,021,581 | |
(a)Inventory includes: single-family lots, land and land development costs; land held for sale; homes under construction; model homes and furnishings; community development district infrastructure; and consolidated inventory not owned.
(b)Includes development reimbursements from local municipalities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, 2017 |
(In thousands) | Midwest | | Southern | | Mid-Atlantic | | Corporate, Financial Services and Unallocated | | Total |
Deposits on real estate under option or contract | $ | 4,933 |
| | $ | 20,719 |
| | $ | 6,904 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 32,556 |
|
Inventory (a) | 500,671 |
| | 636,019 |
| | 245,328 |
| | — |
| | 1,382,018 |
|
Investments in joint venture arrangements | 4,410 |
| | 9,677 |
| | 6,438 |
| | — |
| | 20,525 |
|
Other assets | 13,573 |
| | 38,784 |
| (b) | 13,311 |
| | 364,004 |
| | 429,672 |
|
Total assets | $ | 523,587 |
| | $ | 705,199 |
| | $ | 271,981 |
| | $ | 364,004 |
| | $ | 1,864,771 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, 2016 |
(In thousands) | Midwest | | Southern | | Mid-Atlantic | | Corporate, Financial Services and Unallocated | | Total |
Deposits on real estate under option or contract | $ | 3,989 |
| | $ | 22,607 |
| | $ | 3,260 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 29,856 |
|
Inventory (a) | 399,814 |
| | 484,038 |
| | 302,226 |
| | — |
| | 1,186,078 |
|
Investments in joint venture arrangements | 10,155 |
| | 10,630 |
| | 7,231 |
| | — |
| | 28,016 |
|
Other assets | 25,747 |
| | 35,622 |
| (b) | 13,912 |
| | 229,280 |
| (c) | 304,561 |
|
Total assets | $ | 439,705 |
| | $ | 552,897 |
| | $ | 326,629 |
| | $ | 229,280 |
| | $ | 1,548,511 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, 2015 |
(In thousands) | Midwest | | Southern | | Mid-Atlantic | | Corporate, Financial Services and Unallocated | | Total |
Deposits on real estate under option or contract | $ | 3,379 |
| | $ | 16,128 |
| | $ | 4,203 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23,710 |
|
Inventory (a) | 368,748 |
| | 416,443 |
| | 303,141 |
| | — |
| | 1,088,332 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 5,976 |
| | 30,991 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 36,967 |
|
Other assets | 10,018 |
| | 23,704 |
| (b) | 7,253 |
| | 225,570 |
| | 266,545 |
|
Total assets | $ | 388,121 |
| | $ | 487,266 |
| | $ | 314,597 |
| | $ | 225,570 |
| | $ | 1,415,554 |
|
| |
(a) | Inventory includes: single-family lots, land and land development costs; land held for sale; homes under construction; model homes and furnishings; community development district infrastructure; and consolidated inventory not owned. |
| |
(b) | Includes development reimbursements from local municipalities. |
| |
(c) | During the first quarter of 2016, the Company purchased an airplane for $9.9 million. The asset is included within Property and Equipment - Net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Reportable Segments
The following table presents, by reportable segment, selected operating and financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Northern Region | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 3,071 | | | 2,482 | | | 2,317 | |
New contracts, net | 3,743 | | | 2,695 | | | 2,306 | |
Backlog at end of period | 1,815 | | | 1,143 | | | 930 | |
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 408 | | | $ | 411 | | | $ | 402 | |
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 436 | | | $ | 433 | | | $ | 441 | |
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 792,029 | | | $ | 494,961 | | | $ | 410,434 | |
Housing revenue | $ | 1,252,597 | | | $ | 1,020,362 | | | $ | 932,248 | |
Land sale revenue | $ | 3,808 | | | $ | 6,929 | | | $ | 871 | |
Operating income homes (a) (b) | $ | 125,410 | | | $ | 96,108 | | | $ | 85,747 | |
Operating income land | $ | 178 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 384 | |
Number of average active communities | 93 | | | 91 | | | 84 | |
Number of active communities, end of period | 90 | | | 96 | | | 90 | |
Southern Region | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 4,638 | | | 3,814 | | | 3,461 | |
New contracts, net | 5,684 | | | 4,078 | | | 3,539 | |
Backlog at end of period | 2,574 | | | 1,528 | | | 1,264 | |
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 364 | | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 371 | |
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 406 | | | $ | 368 | | | $ | 385 | |
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 1,044,878 | | | $ | 562,567 | | | $ | 486,280 | |
Housing revenue | $ | 1,687,365 | | | $ | 1,399,986 | | | $ | 1,284,949 | |
Land sale revenue | $ | 15,362 | | | $ | 17,690 | | | $ | 16,018 | |
Operating income homes (a) (c) | $ | 201,750 | | | $ | 114,715 | | | $ | 94,251 | |
Operating income land | $ | 811 | | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 1,661 | |
Number of average active communities | 122 | | | 127 | | | 121 | |
Number of active communities, end of period | 112 | | | 129 | | | 119 | |
Total Homebuilding Regions | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 7,709 | | | 6,296 | | | 5,778 | |
New contracts, net | 9,427 | | | 6,773 | | | 5,845 | |
Backlog at end of period | 4,389 | | | 2,671 | | | 2,194 | |
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 381 | | | $ | 384 | | | $ | 384 | |
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 419 | | | $ | 396 | | | $ | 409 | |
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 1,836,907 | | | $ | 1,057,528 | | | $ | 896,714 | |
Housing revenue | $ | 2,939,962 | | | $ | 2,420,348 | | | $ | 2,217,197 | |
Land sale revenue | $ | 19,170 | | | $ | 24,619 | | | $ | 16,889 | |
Operating income homes (a) (b) (c) (d) | $ | 327,160 | | | $ | 210,823 | | | $ | 179,998 | |
Operating income land | $ | 989 | | | $ | 498 | | | $ | 2,045 | |
Number of average active communities | 215 | | | 218 | | | 205 | |
Number of active communities, end of period | 202 | | | 225 | | | 209 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
(a)Includes the effect of total homebuilding selling, general and administrative expense for the region as disclosed in the first table set forth in this “Outlook” section.
(b)Includes $0.6 million and $5.1 million of acquisition-related charges taken during 2019 and 2018, respectively, as a result of our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes in Detroit, Michigan on March 1, 2018.
(c)Includes a $0.9 million net charge for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed below and in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) taken during 2020. (d)Includes $8.4 million, $5.0 million and $5.8 million of asset impairment charges taken during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Midwest Region | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 1,907 |
| | 1,690 |
| | 1,417 |
|
New contracts, net | 1,978 |
| | 1,775 |
| | 1,485 |
|
Backlog at end of period | 828 |
| | 757 |
| | 672 |
|
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 387 |
| | $ | 374 |
| | $ | 349 |
|
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 415 |
| | $ | 403 |
| | $ | 390 |
|
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 343,660 |
| | $ | 304,826 |
| | $ | 261,792 |
|
Housing revenue | $ | 738,743 |
| | $ | 631,772 |
| | $ | 495,044 |
|
Land sale revenue | $ | 3,834 |
| | $ | 6,122 |
| | $ | 5,829 |
|
Operating income homes (a) | $ | 80,762 |
| | $ | 68,891 |
| | $ | 50,132 |
|
Operating income land | $ | 760 |
| | $ | 1,555 |
| | $ | 1,304 |
|
Number of average active communities | 64 |
| | 66 |
| | 65 |
|
Number of active communities, end of period | 69 |
| | 61 |
| | 73 |
|
Southern Region | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 2,108 |
| | 1,708 |
| | 1,447 |
|
New contracts, net | 2,342 |
| | 1,822 |
| | 1,557 |
|
Backlog at end of period | 908 |
| | 674 |
| | 560 |
|
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 342 |
| | $ | 342 |
| | $ | 340 |
|
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 365 |
| | $ | 355 |
| | $ | 357 |
|
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 331,837 |
| | $ | 239,067 |
| | $ | 200,030 |
|
Housing revenue | $ | 720,704 |
| | $ | 583,817 |
| | $ | 492,227 |
|
Land sale revenue | $ | 9,778 |
| | $ | 18,456 |
| | $ | 22,520 |
|
Operating income homes (a) (b) | $ | 35,198 |
| | $ | 18,086 |
| | $ | 43,127 |
|
Operating income land | $ | 1,600 |
| | $ | 2,312 |
| | $ | 4,149 |
|
Number of average active communities | 85 |
| | 71 |
| | 59 |
|
Number of active communities, end of period | 87 |
| | 79 |
| | 66 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 1,074 |
| | 1,084 |
| | 1,019 |
|
New contracts, net | 979 |
| | 1,158 |
| | 1,051 |
|
Backlog at end of period | 278 |
| | 373 |
| | 299 |
|
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 390 |
| | $ | 364 |
| | $ | 348 |
|
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 416 |
| | $ | 380 |
| | $ | 360 |
|
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 115,756 |
| | $ | 141,564 |
| | $ | 107,602 |
|
Housing revenue | $ | 419,125 |
| | $ | 394,907 |
| | $ | 354,864 |
|
Land sale revenue | $ | 20,094 |
| | $ | 14,242 |
| | $ | 11,936 |
|
Operating income homes (a) | $ | 35,109 |
| | $ | 33,183 |
| | $ | 23,936 |
|
Operating income land | $ | 489 |
| | $ | 267 |
| | $ | 1,208 |
|
Number of average active communities | 34 |
| | 39 |
| | 36 |
|
Number of active communities, end of period | 32 |
| | 38 |
| | 36 |
|
Total Homebuilding Regions | | | | | |
Homes delivered | 5,089 |
| | 4,482 |
| | 3,883 |
|
New contracts, net | 5,299 |
| | 4,755 |
| | 4,093 |
|
Backlog at end of period | 2,014 |
| | 1,804 |
| | 1,531 |
|
Average sales price of homes delivered | $ | 369 |
| | $ | 359 |
| | $ | 346 |
|
Average sales price of homes in backlog | $ | 393 |
| | $ | 380 |
| | $ | 372 |
|
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog | $ | 791,253 |
| | $ | 685,457 |
| | $ | 569,424 |
|
Housing revenue | $ | 1,878,572 |
| | $ | 1,610,496 |
| | $ | 1,342,135 |
|
Land sale revenue | $ | 33,706 |
| | $ | 38,820 |
| | $ | 40,285 |
|
Operating income homes (a) (b) (c) | $ | 151,069 |
| | $ | 120,160 |
| | $ | 117,195 |
|
Operating income land | $ | 2,849 |
| | $ | 4,134 |
| | $ | 6,661 |
|
Number of average active communities | 183 |
| | 176 |
| | 160 |
|
Number of active communities, end of period | 188 |
| | 178 |
| | 175 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes the effect of total homebuilding selling, general and administrative expense for the region as disclosed in the first table set forth in this “Outlook” section. |
| |
(b) | Includes an $8.5 million and a $19.4 million charge for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed below and in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) taken during 2017 and 2016, respectively. |
| |
(c) | Includes $7.7 million, $4.0 million and $3.6 million of asset impairment charges taken during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | (Dollars in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Financial Services | | | | | | Financial Services | |
Number of loans originated | 3,632 |
| | 3,286 |
| | 2,853 |
| Number of loans originated | 5,888 | | | 4,476 | | | 3,964 | |
Value of loans originated | $ | 1,078,520 |
| | $ | 969,690 |
| | $ | 807,985 |
| Value of loans originated | $ | 1,843,576 | | | $ | 1,382,695 | | | $ | 1,200,474 | |
| | | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 49,693 |
| | $ | 42,011 |
| | $ | 35,975 |
| Revenue | $ | 87,013 | | | $ | 55,323 | | | $ | 52,196 | |
Less: Selling, general and administrative expenses | 22,405 |
| | 18,749 |
| | 14,943 |
| Less: Selling, general and administrative expenses | 33,618 | | | 27,973 | | | 24,714 | |
Interest expense | 2,757 |
| | 2,112 |
| | 1,616 |
| |
Less: Interest expense | | Less: Interest expense | 2,927 | | | 3,651 | | | 3,269 | |
Income before income taxes | $ | 24,531 |
| | $ | 21,150 |
| | $ | 19,416 |
| Income before income taxes | $ | 50,468 | | | $ | 23,699 | | | $ | 24,213 | |
| | | | | | |
A home is included in “new contracts” when our standard sales contract is executed. “Homes delivered” represents homes for which the closing of the sale has occurred. “Backlog” represents homes for which the standard sales contract has been executed, but which are not included in homes delivered because deliveriesclosings for these homes have not yet occurred as of the end of the period specified.
The composition of our homes delivered, new contracts, net and backlog is constantly changing and may be based on a dissimilar mix of communities between periods as new communities open and existing communities wind down. Further, home types and individual homes within a community can range significantly in price due to differing square footage, option selections, lot sizes and quality and location of lots. These variations may result in a lack of meaningful comparability between homes delivered, new contracts, net and backlog due to the changing mix between periods.
Cancellation Rates
The following table sets forth the cancellation rates for each of our homebuilding segments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Northern | 9.4 | % | | 10.9 | % | | 13.6 | % |
Southern | 12.4 | % | | 14.3 | % | | 15.2 | % |
Total cancellation rate | 11.2 | % | | 13.0 | % | | 14.6 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Midwest | 12.0 | % | | 13.0 | % | | 15.4 | % |
Southern | 16.5 | % | | 17.7 | % | | 16.9 | % |
Mid-Atlantic | 10.5 | % | | 11.0 | % | | 12.3 | % |
| | | | | |
Total cancellation rate | 13.8 | % | | 14.4 | % | | 15.2 | % |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This report contains information about our adjusted housing gross margin,adjusted income before income taxes, and adjusted net income, to common shareholders, each of which constitutes a non-GAAP financial measure. Because adjusted housing gross margin, adjusted income before income taxes, and adjusted net income to common shareholders are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, these financial measures may not be completely comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other companies in the homebuilding industry and, therefore, should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to operating performance and/or financial measures prescribed by GAAP. Rather, these non-GAAP financial measures should be used to supplement our GAAP results in order to provide a greater understanding of the factors and trends affecting our operations.
Adjusted housing gross margin, adjusted income before income taxes, and adjusted net income to common shareholders are calculated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Housing revenue | | $ | 2,939,962 | | | $ | 2,420,348 | | | $ | 2,217,197 | |
Housing cost of sales | | 2,351,621 | | | 1,986,743 | | | 1,827,669 | |
| | | | | | |
Housing gross margin | | 588,341 | | | 433,605 | | | 389,528 | |
Add: Stucco-related charges (a) | | 860 | | | — | | | — | |
Add: Impairment (b) | | 8,435 | | | 5,002 | | | 5,809 | |
Add: Acquisition-related charges (c) | | — | | | 639 | | | 5,147 | |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | | $ | 597,636 | | | $ | 439,246 | | | $ | 400,484 | |
| | | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | | 20.0 | % | | 17.9 | % | | 17.6 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | | 20.3 | % | | 18.1 | % | | 18.1 | % |
| | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 310,043 | | | $ | 166,025 | | | $ | 141,289 | |
Add: Stucco-related charges (a) | | 860 | | | — | | | — | |
Add: Impairment (b) | | 8,435 | | | 5,002 | | | 5,809 | |
Add: Acquisition-related charges (c) | | — | | | 639 | | | 5,147 | |
Add: Acquisition and integration costs (d) | | — | | | — | | | 1,700 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted income before income taxes | | $ | 319,338 | | | $ | 171,666 | | | $ | 153,945 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 239,874 | | | $ | 127,587 | | | $ | 107,663 | |
Add: Stucco-related charges - net of tax (a) | | 654 | | | — | | | — | |
Add: Impairment - net of tax (b) | | 6,411 | | | 3,802 | | | 4,415 | |
| | | | | | |
Add: Acquisition-related charges - net of tax (c) | | — | | | 486 | | | 3,912 | |
Add: Acquisition and integration costs - net of tax (d) | | — | | | — | | | 1,292 | |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted net income | | $ | 246,939 | | | $ | 131,875 | | | $ | 117,282 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Revenue homes | | $ | 1,878,572 |
| | $ | 1,610,496 |
| | $ | 1,342,135 |
|
Housing cost of sales | | 1,537,846 |
| | 1,327,489 |
| | 1,084,677 |
|
| | | | | | |
Housing gross margin | | 340,726 |
| | 283,007 |
| | 257,458 |
|
Add: Stucco-related charges (a) | | 8,500 |
| | 19,409 |
| | — |
|
Add: Impairment (b) | | 7,681 |
| | 3,992 |
| | 3,638 |
|
| | | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | | $ | 356,907 |
| | $ | 306,408 |
| | $ | 261,096 |
|
| | | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | | 18.1 | % | | 17.6 | % | | 19.2 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | | 19.0 | % | | 19.0 | % | | 19.5 | % |
| | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 120,324 |
| | $ | 91,785 |
| | $ | 86,929 |
|
Add: Stucco-related charges (a) | | 8,500 |
| | 19,409 |
| | — |
|
Add: Impairment (b) | | 7,681 |
| | 3,992 |
| | 3,638 |
|
Add: Loss on early extinguishment of debt (c) | | — |
| | — |
| | 7,842 |
|
| | | | | | |
Adjusted income before income taxes | | $ | 136,505 |
| | $ | 115,186 |
| | $ | 98,409 |
|
| | | | | | |
Net income to common shareholders | | $ | 66,168 |
| | $ | 51,734 |
| | $ | 46,888 |
|
Add: Stucco-related charges - net of tax (a) | | 5,440 |
| | 12,034 |
| | — |
|
Add: Impairment - net of tax (b) | | 4,916 |
| | 2,475 |
| | 2,256 |
|
Add: Loss on early extinguishment of debt - net of tax (c) | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,862 |
|
Add: Excess of fair value over book value of preferred shares redeemed (d) | | 2,257 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Deferred tax asset re-measurement as a result of Tax Act (e) | | 6,520 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | |
Adjusted net income to common shareholders | | $ | 85,301 |
| | $ | 66,243 |
| | $ | 54,006 |
|
| | | | | | |
(a)Represents warranty charges, net of recoveries, for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). | |
(a) | Represents warranty charges for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (as more fully discussed in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).(b)Represents asset impairment charges taken during the respective periods. (c)Represents acquisition-related charges related to our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes in Detroit, Michigan on March 1, 2018 (as more fully discussed in Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). (d)Represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, and miscellaneous expenses related to our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes. As these costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred. |
| |
(b) | Represents asset impairment charges taken during the respective periods. |
| |
(c) | Represents loss on early extinguishment of debt taken during the fourth quarter of 2015. |
| |
(d) | Represents the equity charge related to the excess of fair value over carrying value related to the original issuance costs that were paid in 2007 on our Series A Preferred Shares that were redeemed during the fourth quarter of 2017 (as more fully discussed in Note 11 and 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| |
(e) | Represents the impact of the deferred tax asset re-measurement as a result of the Tax Act passed during the fourth quarter of 2017 (as more fully discussed in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). |
We believe adjusted housing gross margin, adjusted income before income taxes, and adjusted net income to common shareholders are each relevant and useful financial measures to investors in evaluating our operating performance as they measure the gross profit, income before income taxes, and net income to common shareholders we generated specifically on our operations during a given period. These non-GAAP financial measures isolate the impact that the acquisition-related charges, stucco-related charges and impairment charges have on housing gross margins; the impact that the acquisition-related charges, acquisition and integration costs, stucco-related charges impairment charges and early debt extinguishmentimpairment charges have on income before income taxes; and that the acquisition-related charges, acquisition and integration costs, stucco-related charges and impairment charges early debt extinguishment charges, excess of fair value over book value non-cash equity charge, and deferred tax asset re-measurement charge have on net income, to common shareholders, and allow investors to make comparisons with our competitors that adjust housing gross margins, income before income taxes, and net income to common shareholders in a similar manner. We also believe investors will find these adjusted financial measures relevant and useful because they represent a profitability measure that may be compared to a prior period without regard to variability of the charges noted above. These financial measures assist us in making strategic decisions regarding community location and product mix, product pricing and construction pace.
Year Over Year Comparisons
Year Ended December 31, 20172020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162019
The calculation of adjusted housing gross margin (referred to below), which we believe provides a clearer measure of the ongoing performance of our business, is described and reconciled to housing gross margin, the financial measure that is calculated using our GAAP results, below under “Segment Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
MidwestNorthern Region. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2020, homebuilding revenue in our MidwestNorthern region increased $104.7$229.1 million, from $637.9 million$1.0 billion in 20162019 to $742.6 million$1.3 billion in 2017.2020. This 16%22% increase in homebuilding revenue was the result of a 13%24% increase in the number of homes delivered (217(589 units) and, offset, in part, by a 3% increase1% decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered ($13,0003,000 per home delivered). and a $3.1 million decrease in land sale revenue. Operating income in our MidwestNorthern region increased $11.1$29.4 million, from $70.4$96.2 million in 20162019 to $81.5$125.6 million in 2017.2020. The increase in operating income was primarily the result of a $22.4$50.0 million increase in our gross margin, offset, in part, by an $11.4a $20.7 million increase in selling, general, and administrative expense. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our housing gross margin improved $23.2$50.0 million, due to the 13%24% increase in the number of homes delivered and the 3% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered noted above. Our housing gross margin percentage improved 3070 basis points from 19.8%17.9% in 20162019 to 20.1%18.6% in 2017. Housing2020. Our housing gross margin in 2016 was unfavorably impacted in 2020 by a $1.1$8.4 million charge for purchase accounting adjustments from our 2015 Minneapolis/St. Paul acquisition and $0.3 million inof asset impairment charges.charges, and in 2019 by $3.4 million of asset impairment charges and $0.6 million of acquisition-related charges as a result of our acquisition of Pinnacle Homes in March 2018. Exclusive of these prior year charges in both years, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage in 20172020 improved 10 basis points from 2016.18.3% in 2019 to 19.3% in 2020 largely due to a change in product type and market mix of homes delivered compared to prior year and improved demand, offset, in part, by increased lot costs. Our land sale gross margin declined $0.8 millionremained flat in the twelve months ended December 31, 20172020 compared to the same period in 2016 as a result of fewer strategic land sales made in the current year compared to the prior year.2019.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $11.4$20.7 million, from $56.2$86.6 million in 20162019 to $67.6$107.3 million in 2017,2020, and increased as a percentage of revenue to 9.1%8.5% in 20172020 from 8.8%8.4% in 2016.2019. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was attributable, in part, to an $8.5a $13.1 million increase in selling expense, due to (1) a $4.9$10.7 million increase in variable selling expenses resulting from increases in sales commissions produced by the higher average sales price of homes delivered and higher number of homes delivered and (2) a $3.6$2.4 million increase in non-variable selling expenses primarily related to increased headcount and other costs associated with our sales offices and models, including a $1.2 million increase in advertising expense related primarily to new communities and a new marketing campaign.models. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was also attributable to a $2.9$7.6 million increase in general and administrative expense, which was primarily related to a $1.4$3.1 million increase in compensation expense,related expenses, a $0.6$2.1 million increase in land-related expenses, a $0.4$1.1 million increase in professional fees, and a $0.5$1.3 million increase in miscellaneous other miscellaneous expenses.
During 2017,2020, we experienced an 11%a 39% increase in new contracts in our MidwestNorthern region, from 1,7752,695 in 20162019 to 1,9783,743 in 2017,2020, and a 9%59% increase in backlog from 7571,143 homes at December 31, 20162019 to 8281,815 homes at December 31, 2017.2020. The increases in new contracts and backlog were partially dueattributable to contributions from the growth in our Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota division compared to prior year levels, together with improving(1) improved demand in our newer communities.Smart Series communities compared to the prior year and (2) an increase in our average number of communities during the period. Average sales price in backlog increased to $415,000$436,000 at December 31, 20172020 compared to $403,000$433,000 at December 31, 20162019 which was primarily due to product type and market mix.improved demand in our Northern Region in 2020 compared to prior year. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2020, we opened 2729 new communities in our MidwestNorthern region compared to 1328 during 2016.2019. Our monthly absorption rate in our MidwestNorthern region increasedimproved to 2.63.4 per community in 2017,2020, compared to 2.22.5 per community in 2016.2019.
Southern Region.For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2020, homebuilding revenue in our Southern region increased $128.2$285.1 million, from $602.3 million$1.4 billion in 20162019 to $730.5 million$1.7 billion in 2017.2020. This 21%20% increase in homebuilding revenue was primarily the result of a 23%22% increase in the number of homes delivered (400)(824 units), partially offset by an $8.7a $2.3 million decrease in land sale revenue.revenue and a 1% decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered ($3,000 per home delivered). Operating income in our Southern region increased $16.4$87.5 million from $20.4$115.1 million in 20162019 to $36.8$202.6 million in 2017.2020. This increase in operating income was the result of a $31.9$105.2 million improvement in our gross margin, offset, in part, by a $15.5$17.7 million increase in selling, general, and administrative expense. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our housing gross margin improved $32.6$104.8 million, due primarily to the 23%22% increase in the number of homes delivered noted above as well asand the $10.9$1.6 million reduction in stucco-related repair charges, partially offset by a $5.1 million increasedecline in pre-tax impairment charges recorded in 2017 compared to prior year.year, partially offset by $0.9 million of stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities recorded in 2020 (as more fully described in Note 8). Our housing gross margin percentage improved 320 basis points from 14.6%17.9% in prior year's twelve month period2019 to 16.4% for the same period21.1% in 2017.2020. Exclusive of the stucco-related repair charges in 2020 and the impairment charges in both periods,2019, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage improved 20310 basis points from 18.4%18.0% in 20162019 to 18.6%21.1% in the twelve months ended December 31, 20172020 largely due to thea change in product type and mix of communities delivering homes delivered compared to prior year and a more favorable product mix.improved demand in our Southern Region. Our land sale gross margin declined $0.7improved $0.4 million as a result of fewer strategic land salesthe mix of lots sold in the twelve months ended December 31, 2017current year compared to the same period in 2016.prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $15.5$17.8 million from $67.4$136.1 million in 20162019 to $82.9$153.9 million in 2017 and increased2020 but declined as a percentage of revenue to 11.4%9.0% in 20172020 from 11.2%9.6% in 2016.2019. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was attributable, in part, to a $10.6$12.0 million increase in selling expense due to (1) a $6.0$13.9 million increase in variable selling
expenses resulting from increases in sales commissions fromproduced by the higher number of homes delivered, and (2)offset, in part, by a $4.6$1.9 million increasedecrease in non-variable selling expenses primarily related to costs associated with ourthe timing of sales officesoffice and models asmodel openings and a result of our increased community count.reduction in marketing costs. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was also attributable to a $4.9$5.8 million increase in general and administrative expense, which was primarily related to a $3.3$3.7 million increase in land related expensesincentive compensation due to our improved performance, and a $1.4$2.1 million increase related to start-up costs associated with our new Sarasota division, in addition to increases in other miscellaneousland-related expenses.
During 2017,2020, we experienced a 29%39% increase in new contracts in our Southern region, from 1,8224,078 in 20162019 to 2,3425,684 in 2017,2020, and a 35%68% increase in backlog from 6741,528 homes at December 31, 20162019 to 9082,574 homes at December 31, 2017.2020. The increases in new contracts and backlog were primarily due to an increasechanges in our average number of communities during the period,product type and market mix, along with a modest improvement in demand inacross our FloridaSouthern markets as well as continued growth in our Texas operations. Despite these improvements, we believe our new contract volume was negatively impacted by the separate hurricanes that occurred in Florida and Texas during the third quarter of 2017, which we believe resulted in approximately $0.8 million of community and model home repair costs.compared to prior year. Average sales price in backlog increased to $365,000$406,000 at December 31, 20172020 from $355,000$368,000 at December 31, 20162019 primarily due to a change in product type and market mix.mix and improved demand in our Southern Region. During 2017,2020, we opened 3140 communities in our Southern region compared to 2852 in 2016.2019. Our monthly absorption rate in our Southern region improved to 2.33.9 per community in 20172020 from 2.12.7 per community in 2016.2019.
Mid-Atlantic Region. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, homebuilding revenue in our Mid-Atlantic region increased $30.1 million from $409.1 million in 2016 to $439.2 million in 2017. This 7% increase in homebuilding revenue was the result of a 7% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered ($26,000 per home delivered) and a $5.9 million increase in land sale revenue compared to prior year. Operating income in our Mid-Atlantic region increased $2.1 million, from $33.5 million in 2016 to $35.6 million in 2017. This increase in operating income was primarily the result of a $2.1 million increase in our gross margin. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our housing gross margin improved $1.9 million, due to the 7% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered noted above. Our housing gross margin percentage declined by 60 basis points, however, from 18.3% in 2016 to 17.7% in 2017. We had $1.2 million in asset impairment charges in 2016. Exclusive of these prior year charges, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage declined 90 basis points from 18.6% in 2016 to 17.7% in 2017 due primarily to the mix of homes delivered by type and by market. Our land gross margin improved $0.2 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 due to increased strategic land sales in the current year compared to the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expense remained flat at $39.2 million in both 2017 and 2016 but declined as a percentage of revenue to 8.9% compared to 9.6% in 2016. Selling expense increased $0.2 million due to an increase in variable selling expenses resulting from increases in sales commissions produced by higher average sales price of homes delivered. General and administrative expense decreased $0.3 million primarily related to a decrease in land related expenses.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, we experienced a 15% decrease in new contracts in our Mid-Atlantic region, from 1,158 in 2016 to 979 in 2017, and a 25% decrease in the number of homes in backlog from 373 homes at December 31, 2016 to 278 homes at December 31, 2017. The decreases in new contracts and backlog were primarily due to a decrease in the average number of active communities during the period compared to the prior year, and partly as a result of delays in planned new community openings in the period compared to the prior year. Average sales price of homes in backlog increased, however, from $380,000 at December 31, 2016 to $416,000 at December 31, 2017. We opened nine communities in our Mid-Atlantic region during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 compared to 11 during the same period in 2016. Our monthly absorption rate in our Mid-Atlantic region declined slightly to 2.4 per community in 2017 from 2.5 per community in 2016.
Financial Services. Revenue from our mortgage and title operations increased $7.7$31.7 million, (18%)or 57%, from $42.0$55.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162019 to a record $49.7$87.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 20172020 as a result of an 11%a 32% increase in the number of loan originations, from 3,2864,476 in 20162019 to 3,6325,888 in 2017,2020, and a slightan increase in the average loan amount from $295,000$309,000 in 20162019 to $297,000$313,000 in 2017. In addition, we2020. We also experienced an increase in the volume of loans sold, a gain from the sale of a portion of our servicing portfolio during the first quarter of 2017, and higher margins on loans sold during the period compared to 2019. Revenue was reduced by a $0.2 million impairment charge on our mortgage servicing rights caused by the disruption in the first halfmortgage industry as a result of the year than we experienced in the prior year.COVID-19 pandemic. See Note 3 to our financial statements for further information. Our financial service operations ended 20172020 with a $4.0$26.0 million increase in operating income compared to the same period in 2016,2019, which was primarily due to the increase in our revenue discussed above partially offset in part, by a $3.7$5.6 million increase in selling, general and administrative expense compared to 2016, which2019. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was primarily attributable to a $2.1 millionan increase in compensation expense a $0.6 million increase in computer costs related to our investmentincrease in new information systemsemployee headcount and increasesan increase in other miscellaneous expenses.
incentive compensation due to improved results.
At December 31, 2017,2020, M/I Financial provided financing services in all of our markets. Approximately 81%85% of our homes delivered during 20172020 were financed through M/I Financial, compared to 84%82% during 2016.2019. Capture rate is influenced by financing availability and can fluctuate from quarter to quarter.
Corporate Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Corporate selling, general and administrative expense increased $3.7$10.7 million, from $38.8$51.6 million in 20162019 to $42.5$62.3 million in 2017.2020. The increase was primarily due to a $2.3$4.7 million increase in compensation expense due to improved results during the period, a $0.5$1.4 million increase in charitable contributions,corporate home office rent-related expense, a $0.4$1.3 million increase related to costs associated with new information systems, a $0.9 million increase in charitable contributions, and a $0.5$2.4 million increase in other miscellaneous expenses.
Interest Expense - Net. Interest expense for the Company increased by $1.3 million,Equity in income from $17.6 millionjoint venture arrangements. Equity in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 to $18.9 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in our weighted average borrowings from $612.5 million in 2016 to $678.2 million in 2017. The increase in our weighted average borrowings primarily related to the issuance of $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2025 Senior Notes during the third quarter of 2017, partially offset by the conversion of all of the then outstanding $57.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes into common shares in September 2017 and by a decrease in borrowings under our Credit Facility (as defined below) during 2017 compared to 2016. Our weighted average borrowing rate also increased from 5.77% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 to 5.99% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, which was primarily due to our newly issued 2025 Senior Notes.
Earnings from Joint Venture Arrangements. Earningsincome from joint venture arrangements represents our portion of pre-tax earnings from our joint ownership and development agreements, joint ventures andventure arrangements where a special purpose entity is established (“LLCs”) with the other similar arrangements. In 2017 and 2016, thepartners. The Company earned $0.5 million and $0.6$0.3 million respectively,of equity in equity income from joint venture arrangements.its LLCs during 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Interest Expense - Net. Interest expense for the Company decreased $11.7 million from $21.4 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 to $9.7 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in average borrowings under our Credit Facility during 2020 compared to prior year, the redemption of our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) at the beginning of the first quarter of 2020, and the issuance of our 2028 Senior Notes, which were not outstanding during 2019 and have a lower interest rate than the 2021 Senior Notes. Our weighted average borrowings decreased from $842.4 million in 2019 to $767.5 million in 2020, and our weighted average borrowing interest rate declined from 6.17% in 2019 to 5.53% in the 2020.
Income Taxes. Our overall effective tax rate was 40.1%22.6% for the year ended December 31, 20172020 and 38.3%23.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. The increasedecrease in the effective rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 20172020 was primarily attributable to the impact of the non-cash provisionala $7.2 million tax expense of approximately $6.5 millionbenefit related to the re-measurement of our deferredenergy tax assets as a result of the decrease in the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% under the Tax Act enacted during the fourth quarter of 2017 (please see credits (see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
Segment Non-GAAP Financial Measures.This report contains information about our adjusted housing gross margin, which constitutes a non-GAAP financial measure. Because adjusted housing gross margin is not calculated in accordance with GAAP, this financial measure may not be completely comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other companies in the homebuilding industry and, therefore, should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to operating performance and/or financial measures prescribed by GAAP. Rather, this non-GAAP financial measure should be used to supplement our GAAP results in order to provide a greater understanding of the factors and trends affecting our operations.
Adjusted housing gross margin for each of our reportable segments is calculated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | |
Northern region: | | | | | |
Housing revenue | $ | 1,252,597 | | | $ | 1,020,362 | | | $ | 932,248 | |
Housing cost of sales | 1,019,860 | | | 837,606 | | | 767,445 | |
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin | 232,737 | | | 182,756 | | | 164,803 | |
Add: Impairment (a) | 8,435 | | | 3,395 | | | 273 | |
Add: Acquisition-related charges (b) | — | | | 639 | | | 5,147 | |
| | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | $ | 241,172 | | | $ | 186,790 | | | $ | 170,223 | |
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | 18.6 | % | | 17.9 | % | | 17.7 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | 19.3 | % | | 18.3 | % | | 18.3 | % |
| | | | | |
Southern region: | | | | | |
Housing revenue | $ | 1,687,365 | | | $ | 1,399,986 | | | $ | 1,284,949 | |
Housing cost of sales | 1,331,761 | | | 1,149,137 | | | 1,060,224 | |
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin | 355,604 | | | 250,849 | | | 224,725 | |
Add: Impairment (a) | — | | | 1,607 | | | 5,536 | |
Add: Stucco-related charges (c) | 860 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | $ | 356,464 | | | $ | 252,456 | | | $ | 230,261 | |
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | 21.1 | % | | 17.9 | % | | 17.5 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | 21.1 | % | | 18.0 | % | | 17.9 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | | | |
Midwest region: | | | | | |
Housing revenue | $ | 738,743 |
| | $ | 631,772 |
| | $ | 495,044 |
|
Housing cost of sales | 590,423 |
| | 506,652 |
| | 399,821 |
|
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin | 148,320 |
| | 125,120 |
| | 95,223 |
|
Add: Impairment (a) | — |
| | 253 |
| | — |
|
Add: Purchase accounting adjustments (b) | — |
| | 1,081 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | $ | 148,320 |
| | $ | 126,454 |
| | $ | 95,223 |
|
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | 20.1 | % | | 19.8 | % | | 19.2 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | 20.1 | % | | 20.0 | % | | 19.2 | % |
| | | | | |
Southern region: | | | | | |
Housing revenue | $ | 720,704 |
| | $ | 583,817 |
| | $ | 492,227 |
|
Housing cost of sales | 602,585 |
| | 498,314 |
| | 392,208 |
|
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin | 118,119 |
| | 85,503 |
| | 100,019 |
|
Add: Impairment (a) | 7,681 |
| | 2,578 |
| | — |
|
Add: Stucco-related charges (c) | 8,500 |
| | 19,409 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | $ | 134,300 |
| | $ | 107,490 |
| | $ | 100,019 |
|
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | 16.4 | % | | 14.6 | % | | 20.3 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | 18.6 | % | | 18.4 | % | | 20.3 | % |
| | | | | |
Mid-Atlantic region: | | | | | |
Housing revenue | $ | 419,125 |
| | $ | 394,907 |
| | $ | 354,864 |
|
Housing cost of sales | 344,838 |
| | 322,523 |
| | 292,648 |
|
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin | 74,287 |
| | 72,384 |
| | 62,216 |
|
Add: Impairment (a) | — |
| | 1,161 |
| | 3,638 |
|
| | | | | |
Adjusted housing gross margin | $ | 74,287 |
| | $ | 73,545 |
| | $ | 65,854 |
|
| | | | | |
Housing gross margin percentage | 17.7 | % | | 18.3 | % | | 17.5 | % |
Adjusted housing gross margin percentage | 17.7 | % | | 18.6 | % | | 18.6 | % |
| |
(a) | Represents asset impairment charges taken during the respective periods. |
| |
(b) | Represents purchase accounting adjustments from our 2015 Minneapolis/St. Paul acquisition. |
| |
(c) | Represents warranty charges for stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities taken during 2017 and 2016. With respect to this matter, during 2017, we identified 509 additional homes in need of repair and completed repairs on 594 homes, and at December 31, 2017, we have 212 homes in various stages of repair. Please see Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. |
(a)Represents asset impairment charges taken during the respective periods. Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015
Midwest Region. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, homebuilding revenue in our Midwest region increased $137.0 million, from $500.9 million in 2015 to $637.9 million in 2016. This 27% increase in homebuilding revenue was the result of a 7% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered ($25,000 per home delivered) and a 19% increase in the number of homes delivered (273 units). Operating income in our Midwest region increased $19.0 million, from $51.4 million in 2015 to $70.4 million in 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily the result of a $30.1 million increase in our gross margin, offset, in part, by an $11.1 million increase in selling, general, and administrative expense. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our housing gross margin improved $29.9 million, due to the 19% increase in the number of homes delivered and the 7% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered noted above. Our housing gross margin percentage improved 60 basis points from 19.2% in 2015 to 19.8% in 2016, but was unfavorably impacted during 2016 by a $1.1 million charge for purchase accounting
adjustments(b)Represents acquisition-related charges from our 2015 Minneapolis/St. Paul acquisition and $0.3 millionof Pinnacle Homes in asset impairment charges. ExclusiveDetroit, Michigan on March 1, 2018.
(c)Represents warranty charges, net of these charges, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage improved 80 basis points to 20.0% in 2016 compared to 19.2% in 2015. Our land gross margin improved $0.3 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of increased profits on land sales made in the current year compared to the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $11.1 million, from $45.1 million in 2015 to $56.2 million in 2016, but declined as a percentage of revenue to 8.8% in 2016 from 9.0% in 2015. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was attributable, in part, to a $6.6 million increase in selling expense, due to (1) a $4.7 million increase in variable selling expenses resulting from increases in sales commissions produced by the higher average sales price of homes delivered and higher number of homes delivered, $1.4 million of which was associated with our new Minneapolis/St. Paul division, and (2) a $1.9 million increase in non-variable selling expenses associated with our sales offices and models, $1.2 million of which related to our new Minneapolis/St. Paul division. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was also attributable to a $4.5 million increase in general and administrative expense, which was primarily related to a $3.8 million increase in compensation expense, $1.0 million of which related to our new Minneapolis/St. Paul division, a $0.4 million increase in land-related expenses, and a $0.3 million increase in other miscellaneous expenses.
During 2016, we experienced a 20% increase in new contracts in our Midwest region, from 1,485 in 2015 to 1,775 in 2016, and a 13% increase in backlog from 672 homes at December 31, 2015 to 757 homes at December 31, 2016. The increases in new contracts and backlog were partially due to the addition of 91 homes in backlog from our Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota division together with improving sub-market conditions within the region. Average sales price in backlog increased to $403,000 at December 31, 2016 compared to $390,000 at December 31, 2015 which was primarily due to higher-end product offerings. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, we opened 13 new communities in our Midwest region compared to 24 during 2015. Our monthly absorption rate in our Midwest region increased to 2.2 per community in 2016, compared to 1.9 in 2015.
Southern Region.For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, homebuilding revenue in our Southern region increased $87.6 million, from $514.7 million in 2015 to $602.3 million in 2016. This 17% increase in homebuilding revenue was primarily the result of an 18% increase in the number of homes delivered (261), partially offset by a $4.1 million decrease in land sale revenue. Operating income in our Southern region decreased $26.9 million from $47.3 million in 2015 to $20.4 million in 2016. This decrease in operating income was the result of a $16.4 million decline in our gross margin in addition to a $10.5 million increase in selling, general, and administrative expense. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our housing gross margin declined $14.5 million, due to a $19.4 million chargerecoveries, for known and estimated future stucco-related repair costs in certain of our Florida communities (during 2016,taken during 2020. With respect to this matter, during 2020, we identified 496156 additional homes in need of repair and completed repairs on 337176 homes, with 297and at December 31, 2020, we have 116 homes in various stages of repair at December 31, 2016 - please see repair. See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) and $2.6 million in asset impairment charges in certainfurther information.Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
For a comparison of our older Texas communities duringresults of operations for the twelve monthsfiscal years ended December 31, 2016, partially offset by the 18% increase in the number2019 and December 31, 2018, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of homes delivered noted above. Our housing gross margin percentage declined from 20.3% in prior year's twelve month period to 14.6%Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the same period in 2016. Exclusive of the stucco-related and impairment charges, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage declined 190 basis points to 18.4% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 largely due to the mix of communities delivering homes and higher construction and lot costs. Our land gross margin declined $1.8 million as a result of fewer strategic land sales in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $10.5 million from $56.9 million in 2015 to $67.4 million in 2016 and increased slightly as a percentage of revenue to 11.2% in 2016 from 11.1% in 2015. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was attributable, in part, to a $6.3 million increase in selling expense due to (1) a $4.1 million increase in variable selling expenses resulting from increases in sales commissions from the higher average sales price of homes delivered and higher number of homes delivered, and (2) a $2.2 million increase in non-variable selling expenses primarily related to costs associated with our sales offices and models as a result of our increased community count. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was also attributable to a $4.2 million increase in general and administrative expense, which was primarily related to a $1.3 million increase in compensation related expense, a $0.6 million increase related to start-up costs associated with our new Sarasota division, a $1.1 million increase in land related expenses, a $0.3 million increase in professional fees, and a $0.9 million increase in other miscellaneous expenses.
During 2016, we experienced a 17% increase in new contracts in our Southern region, from 1,557 in 2015 to 1,822 in 2016, and a 20% increase in backlog from 560 homes at December 31, 2015 to 674 homes at December 31, 2016. The increases in new contracts and backlog were primarily due to improved demand in our Florida markets as well as continued growth in many of our Texas markets. Average sales price in backlog decreased, however, to $355,000 at December 31, 2016 from $357,000 at December 31, 2015 due to a change in product type and market mix. During 2016, we opened 28 communities in our Southern region compared to 23 in 2015. Our monthly absorption rate in our Southern region declined slightly to 2.1 per community in 2016 from 2.2 per community in 2015.
Mid-Atlantic Region. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, homebuilding revenue in our Mid-Atlantic region increased $42.3 million from $366.8 million in 2015 to $409.1 million in 2016. This 12% increase in homebuilding revenue was the result of a 5% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered ($16,000 per home delivered), a 6% increase in the number of homes delivered (65 units), and a $2.3 million increase in land sale revenue compared to prior year. Operating income in our Mid-Atlantic region increased $8.4 million, from $25.1 million in 2015 to $33.5 million in 2016. This increase in operating income was primarily the result of a $9.3 million increase in our gross margin, partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in selling, general and administrative expense. With respect to our homebuilding gross margin, our housing gross margin improved $10.2 million, due to the 5% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered and the 6% increase in the number of homes delivered noted above. Our housing gross margin percentage improved by 80 basis points from 17.5% in 2015 to 18.3% in 2016. We had $1.2 million in asset impairment charges in 2016 and $3.6 million of asset impairment charges in 2015. Exclusive of these charges in both years, our adjusted housing gross margin percentage improved 6 basis points to 18.62% in 2016 compared to 18.56% in 2015. Our land gross margin declined $0.9 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to lower profits on land sales in the current year compared to the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $0.9 million from $38.3 million in 2015 to $39.2 million in 2016 but declined as a percentage of revenue to 9.6% compared to 10.4% in 2015. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was attributable, in part, to a $0.5 million increase in selling expense primarily due to an increase in variable selling expenses resulting from increases in sales commissions produced by the higher average sales price of homes delivered and higher number of homes delivered. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was also attributable to a $0.4 million increase in general and administrative expense, which was primarily related to an increase in incentive compensation related expenses.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, we experienced a 10% increase in new contracts in our Mid-Atlantic region, from 1,051 in 2015 to 1,158 in 2016, and a 25% increase in the number of homes in backlog from 299 homes at December 31, 2015 to 373 homes at December 31, 2016. Average sales price of homes in backlog increased from $360,000 at December 31, 2015 to $380,000 at December 31, 2016. We opened 11 communities in our Mid-Atlantic region during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 compared to 15 during the same period in 2015. Our monthly absorption rate in our Mid-Atlantic region was 2.5 per community in 2016, the same as in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.
Financial Services. Revenue from our mortgage and title operations increased $6.0 million (17%) from $36.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 to $42.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 as a result of a 15% increase in the number of loan originations, from 2,853 in 2015 to 3,286 in 2016, and a 4.2% increase in the average loan amount from $283,000 in 2015 to $295,000 in 2016. In addition, we experienced higher margins on our loans sold than we experienced in 2015 due to more favorable market conditions during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2016.
Our financial service operations ended 2016 with a $2.2 million increase in operating income compared to the same period in 2015, which was primarily due to the increase in our revenue discussed above, offset, in part, by a $3.8 million increase in selling, general and administrative expense compared to 2015, which was primarily attributable to a $2.1 million increase in compensation expense, a $0.8 million increase in expenses related to mortgage loans sold, a $0.6 million increase in computer costs related to our investment in new information systems, and a $0.3 million increase in other miscellaneous expenses.
At December 31, 2016, M/I Financial provided financing services in all of our markets. Approximately 84% of our homes delivered during 2016 were financed through M/I Financial, compared to 81% during 2015. Capture rate is influenced by financing availability and can fluctuate from quarter to quarter.
Corporate Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Corporate selling, general and administrative expense increased $5.7 million, from $33.1 million in 2015 to $38.8 million in 2016. The increase was primarily due to a $3.0 million increase in compensation expense, a $1.1 million increase in depreciation expense, a $0.3 million increase related to costs associated with new information systems, a $0.2 million increase in professional fees, and a $1.1 million increase in other miscellaneous expenses.
Interest Expense - Net. Interest expense for the Company increased slightly by $0.1 million, from $17.5 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 to $17.6 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in our weighted average borrowings from $573.2 million in 2015 to $612.5 million in 2016. The increase in our weighted average borrowings primarily related to an increase in average borrowings under the Credit Facility during 2016 compared to 2015, combined with an increase in the principal amount of senior notes outstanding at December 31, 2016 ($300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2021 Senior Notes outstanding at December 31, 2016 compared to $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2018 Senior Notes outstanding during 2015). Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in our weighted average borrowing rate from 6.21% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 to 5.77% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, which was primarily due to the lower interest rate payable on the 2021 Senior Notes compared with the interest rate payable on the 2018 Senior Notes that were outstanding during 2015.
Earnings from Joint Venture Arrangements. Earnings from joint venture arrangements represents our portion of pre-tax earnings from our joint ownership and development agreements, joint ventures and other similar arrangements. In 2016 and 2015, the Company earned $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in equity income from joint venture arrangements.
Income Taxes. Our overall effective tax rate was 38.3% for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and 40.5% for2019, filed with the year ended December 31, 2015. The lower effective rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was primarily attributable to the impact of annual tax benefits expected for the domestic production activities deduction and energy tax credits that were realized during 2016 (please see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).SEC on February 21, 2020.LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview of Capital Resources and Liquidity
At December 31, 2017,2020, we had $151.7$260.8 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, with $150.7$260.7 million of this amount comprised of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, which represents a $117.4$254.8 million increase in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents from December 31, 2016.2019. Our principal uses of cash during 20172020 were investment in land and land development, construction of homes, mortgage loan originations, investment in joint ventures, operating expenses, and short-term working capital, and debt service requirements,including the redemption of our 2021 Senior Notes and the repayment of amounts outstanding under our credit facilities.facilities, and the repurchase of $1.9 million of our outstanding common shares under our 2018 Share Repurchase Program (as defined below) during the first quarter of 2020. In order to fund these uses of cash, we used proceeds from home deliveries, the sale of mortgage loans and the sale of mortgage servicing rights, as well as excess cash balances, proceeds from the issuance of our 2028 Senior Notes (as described below), borrowings under our credit facilities, and other sources of liquidity.
The Company is a party to three primary credit agreements: (1) the third quarter of 2017,Credit Facility, our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility, with M/I Homes, Inc. as borrower and guaranteed by the Company’s wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiaries; (2) the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement, our $125 million secured mortgage warehousing agreement (which increased to $160 million from September 25, 2020 to October 15, 2020 and to $185 million from November 15, 2020 to February 4, 2021), with M/I Financial as borrower; and (3) the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility, our $90 million mortgage repurchase agreement, with M/I Financial as borrower.
In January 2020, we issued $250$400 million in aggregate principal amount of 2025our 2028 Senior Notes resulting in $245.9 millionat par, for net proceeds of cash proceeds, net of issuance costs.approximately $393.9 million. We used $138.0$300.4 million of the net proceeds from the issuanceto redeem all $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2025our 2021 Senior Notes, at par, and we used the remaining net proceeds to repay alla portion of our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility. Also duringAs of December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding and $61.0 million of letters of credit outstanding under the third quarterCredit Facility, leaving $439.0 million in available borrowings.
We expect to continue managing our balance sheet and liquidity carefully in 2021 by managing our spending on land acquisition and development and construction of 2017, the holdersinventory homes, as well as overhead expenditures, relative to our ongoing volume of all of our then outstanding 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes elected to convert their Notes into our common shares,home deliveries, and we issued approximately 2.4 million common sharesexpect to meet our current and anticipated capital requirements in connection therewith. 2021 from cash receipts and availability under our Credit Facility, as well as excess cash balances.
During the fourth quarter of 2017,year ended December 31, 2020, we redeemed all 2,000 of our outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for $50.4delivered 7,709 homes, started 8,611 homes, and spent $415.0 million in cash.
on land purchases and $318.3 million on land development.
We are activelyselectively acquiring and developing lots in our markets to replenish and growincrease our lot supply and active community count. We expect to continue to expand our business based on the anticipated level of demand for new homes in our markets. Accordingly, we expect our cash outlays for land purchases, land development, home construction and operating expenses will continue to exceed our cash generated by operations during some monthly and quarterly periods in 2018, and we expect to utilize our revolving credit facility in 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we delivered 5,089 homes, started 5,407 homes, and spent $328.2 million on land purchases and $200.7 million on land development. Based on our business activity levels,monitor market conditions and opportunities forour pace of home sales and deliveries and adjust our land in our markets, we currently estimate that we will spend approximately $550 million to $600 million on land purchases and land development during 2018.
We also continue to enter into land option agreements, taking into consideration current and projected market conditions, to secure land for the construction of homes in the future.spending accordingly. Pursuant to such land option agreements, as of December 31, 2017,2020, we had a total of 16,90922,710 lots under contract, with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $715.7$799.7 million, to be acquired during the period from 20182021 through 2028.2029.
Land transactions are subject to a number of factors, including our financial condition and market conditions, as well as satisfaction of various conditions related to specific properties. We will continue to monitor market conditions and our ongoing pace of home deliveries and adjust our land spending accordingly. The planned increase in our land spending in 2018 compared to 2017 is driven primarily by the growth of our business.
Operating Cash Flow Activities. During 2017,2020, we used $52.5generated $168.3 million of cash from operating activities, compared to generating $65.6 million of cash in operating activities compared to $34.2 million ofin 2019. The cash provided bygenerated from operating activities in 2016. The cash used in operating activities in 2017 was primarily a result of a $168.6 million increase in inventory , offset partially by net income and the non-cash impact of changes in deferred tax expense totaling $84.5 million and an increase in accounts payable, accrued compensation, other liabilities and customer deposits totaling $27.0 million. The $34.2 million of cash provided by operating activities in 20162020 was primarily a result of net income and the non-cash impact of changes in deferred tax expense totaling $87.9$239.9 million and ana $128.7 million increase in accounts payable, accrued compensation,customer deposits and other liabilities, and customer deposits totaling $54.0 million, offset partially by an $83.8payments for mortgage loan originations which exceeded the proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans by $78.7 million and a $134.9 million increase in inventoryinventory. The cash provided by operating activities in 2019 was primarily a result of net income of $127.6 million and fundings of mortgage loan originations net$12.1 million of proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans net of $30.6 million.mortgage loan originations, offset partially by an $88.4 million increase in inventory and a $17.5 million decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities.
Investing Cash Flow Activities. During 2017,2020, we used $9.8$33.9 million of cash in investing activities, compared to $31.6using $27.6 million of cash used in investing activities during 2016.2019. This $21.8$6.3 million decreaseincrease in cash usage was primarily due to a decrease$7.2 million increase in spending
onpurchases of property and equipment primarily resulting from our purchase of an airplane during 2016, $7.6the period compared to prior year, offset partially by $3.9 million ofin proceeds received from the sale of a portion of our mortgage servicing rights in 2017, and a $9.7 million decrease in our investment in joint venture arrangements in 2017 compared to prior year.during the fourth quarter of 2020.
Financing Cash Flow Activities. During 2017,2020, we generated $179.6$120.3 million of cash from our financing activities, compared to generating $18.8using $53.5 million of cash from our financing activities during 2016.2019. The $160.8 million increase in cash generated from financing activities in 2020 was primarily due to the issuance of our $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 20252028 Senior Notes, net of debt issuance costs, for $391.5 million and increased borrowings under our two M/I Financial credit facilities of $88.7 million, offset in part,partially by the redemption of all 2,000$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for $50.4 million, as well as increased2021 Senior Notes, and repayments of $66.0 million (net of proceeds from borrowings) under our Credit Facility during 2020.
On August 14, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the “2018 Share Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to $50 million of its outstanding common shares (see Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). During 2020, the Company repurchased 0.1 million common shares with an aggregate purchase price of $1.9 million which was funded with cash on hand and borrowings under our Credit Facility (as defined below) and our M/I Financial credit facilities duringFacility. As of December 31, 2020, the period.Company is authorized to repurchase an additional $17.2 million of outstanding common shares under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program.
At December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016,2019, our ratio of homebuilding debt to capital was 46%34% and 43%38%, respectively, calculated as the carrying value of our outstanding homebuilding debt (which consists of borrowings under our Credit Facility, our 2028 Senior Notes, our 2025 Senior Notes, and Notes Payable-Other) divided by the sum of the carrying value of our outstanding homebuilding debt plus shareholders' equity. The increase compared to December 31, 2016 was due to higher debt levels compared to December 31, 2016 offset partially by an increase in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2017. We believe that this ratio provides useful information for understanding our financial position and the leverage employed in our operations, and for comparing us with other homebuilders.
We fund our operations with cash flows from operating activities, including proceeds from home deliveries, land sales and the sale of mortgage loans. We believe that these sources of cash, along with our balance of unrestricted cash and borrowings available under our credit facilities, will be sufficient to fund our currently anticipated working capital needs, investment in land and land development, construction of homes, operating expenses, planned capital spending, and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months. In addition, we routinely monitor current and anticipated operational and debt service requirements, financial market conditions, and credit relationships and we may choose to seek additional capital by issuing new debt and/or equity securities or engaging in other financial transactions to strengthen our liquidity or our long-term capital structure. For example, in August 2017, we issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2025 Senior Notes, as discussed above. The financing needs of our homebuilding and financial services operations depend on anticipated sales volume in the current year as well as future years, inventory levels and related turnover, forecasted land and lot purchases, debt maturity dates, and other factors. If we seek such additional capital or engage in such other financial transactions, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain such additional capital or consummate such other financial transactions on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and such additional equity or debt financing or other financial transactions could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders, add operational limitations and/or increase our interest costs.
The Company is a party to three primary credit agreements: (1) a $475 million unsecured revolving credit facility dated July 18, 2013, as amended, with M/I Homes, Inc. as borrower and guaranteed by the Company's wholly owned homebuilding subsidiaries (the “Credit Facility”); (2) a $125 million secured mortgage warehousing agreement, (which increases to $150 million during certain periods), dated June 24, 2016, as amended, with M/I Financial as borrower (the “MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement”); and (3) a $35 million mortgage repurchase agreement (which increases to $50 million during certain periods), as amended and restated on October 30, 2017, with M/I Financial as borrower (the “MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility”).
Included in the table below is a summary of our available sources of cash from the Credit Facility, the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility as of December 31, 2017:2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | Expiration Date | Outstanding Balance | Available Amount |
Notes payable – homebuilding (a) | (a) | $ | — | | $ | 439,015 | |
Notes payable – financial services (b) | (b) | $ | 225,634 | | $ | 1,670 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | Expiration Date | Outstanding Balance | Available Amount |
Notes payable – homebuilding (a) | 7/18/2021 | $ | — |
| $ | 425,951 |
|
Notes payable – financial services (b) | (b) | $ | 168,195 |
| $ | 1,241 |
|
| |
(a) | The available amount under the Credit Facility is computed in accordance with the borrowing base calculation under the Credit Facility, which applies various advance rates for different categories of inventory and totaled $512.9 million of availability for additional senior debt at December 31, 2017. As a result, the full $475 million commitment amount of the facility was available, less any borrowings and letters of credit outstanding. There were no borrowings outstanding and $49.0 million of letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2017, leaving $426.0 million available. The Credit Facility has an expiration date of July 18, 2021. |
| |
(b) | The available amount is computed in accordance with the borrowing base calculations under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility, each of which may be increased by pledging additional mortgage collateral. The maximum aggregate commitment amount of M/I Financial's warehousing agreements as of December 31, 2017 was $200 million, which included temporary increases for each facility (as further described below) which were applicable through February 1, 2018 at which time the maximum aggregate commitment amount under the two agreements reverted to $160 million. The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement has an expiration date of June 22, 2018 and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility has an expiration date of October 29, 2018.
|
(a)The available amount under the Credit Facility is computed in accordance with the borrowing base calculation under the Credit Facility, which applies various advance rates for different categories of inventory and totaled $926.9 million of availability for additional senior debt at December 31, 2020. As a result, the full $500 million commitment amount of the facility was available, less any borrowings and letters of credit outstanding. There were no borrowings outstanding and $61.0 million of letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2020, leaving $439.0 million available. The Credit Facility has an expiration date of July 18, 2023 for $475.0 million of commitments and July 18, 2021 for $25.0 million of commitments.
(b)The available amount is computed in accordance with the borrowing base calculations under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility, each of which may be increased by pledging additional mortgage collateral. The maximum aggregate commitment amount of M/I Financial's warehousing agreements as of December 31, 2020 was $275 million, which included a temporary increase for the MIF Mortgage Warehouse Agreement applicable through February 4, 2021 (as described below) at which time the maximum aggregate commitment amount under the two agreements reverted to $215 million. The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement has an expiration date of May 28, 2021 and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility has an expiration date of October 25, 2021.
Notes Payable - Homebuilding.
Homebuilding Credit Facility. The Credit Facility provides for an aggregate commitment amount of $475$500 million, including a $125 million sub-facility for letters of credit. In addition, the Credit Facility hasand also includes an accordion feature underpursuant to which the Companymaximum borrowing availability may increase thebe increased to an aggregate commitment amount up to $500of $600 million, subject to certain conditions, including obtaining additional commitments from existing or new lenders. The Credit Facility matures on July 18, 2021.2023 for $475.0 million of commitments and July 18, 2021 for $25.0 million of commitments. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility is payable at a rate which is adjusted daily and is equal to the sum of the one monthone-month LIBOR rate(subject to a floor of 0.75%) plus a margin of 250 basis points. The margin is subjectpoints (subject to adjustment in subsequent quarterly periods based on the Company’s leverage ratio.ratio).
Borrowings under the Credit Facility constitute senior, unsecured indebtedness and availability is subject to, among other things, a borrowing base calculated using various advance rates for different categories of inventory. The Credit Facility also provides for a $125 million sub-facility for letters of credit. The Credit Facility contains various representations, warranties and covenants which require, among other things, that the Company maintain (1) a minimum level of Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of $487.2$813.4 million at December 31, 2020 (subject to increase over time based on earnings and proceeds from equity offerings), (2) a leverage ratio not in excess of 60%, and (3) either a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 or a minimum amount of available liquidity. In addition, the Credit Facility contains covenants that limit the Company’s number of unsold housing units and model homes, as well as the amount of Investments in Unrestricted Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures.Ventures (each as defined in the Credit Facility).
The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s subsidiaries, with the exception of subsidiaries that are primarily engaged in the business of mortgage financing, title insurance or similar financial businesses relating to the homebuilding and home sales business, certain subsidiaries that are not 100%-owned by the Company or another subsidiary, and other subsidiaries designated by the Company as Unrestricted Subsidiaries,
(as defined in Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements), subject to limitations on the aggregate amount invested in such Unrestricted Subsidiaries. The guarantors for the Credit Facility are the same subsidiaries that guarantee our 2028 Senior Notes and our 2025 Senior Notes, our $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) and our $86.3 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes”).Notes.As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Credit Facility, including financial covenants. The following table summarizes the most significant restrictive covenant thresholds under the Credit Facility and our compliance with such covenants as of December 31, 2017:2020:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Financial Covenant | | Covenant Requirement | | Actual |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth | ≥ | $ | 487.2 |
| | $ | 701.6 |
|
Leverage Ratio | ≤ | 0.60 |
| | 0.43 |
|
Interest Coverage Ratio | ≥ | 1.5 to 1.0 |
| | 5.1 to 1.0 |
|
Investments in Unrestricted Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures | ≤ | $ | 210.5 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
|
Unsold Housing Units and Model Homes | ≤ | 1,988 |
| | 1,034 |
|
Homebuilding Letter of Credit Facilities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company was a party to a secured credit agreement for the issuance of letters of credit outside of the Credit Facility (the “Letter of Credit Facility”). During 2017, the Company extended the maturity date on the Letter of Credit Facility to September 30, 2018 and reduced the amount of the facility from $2.0 million to $1.0 million.
As of December 31, 2017, there was a total of $0.6 million of letters of credit issued under the Letter of Credit Facility, which was collateralized with $0.6 million of restricted cash. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Covenant | | Covenant Requirement | | Actual |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth | ≥ | $ | 813.4 | | | $ | 1,181.8 | |
Leverage Ratio | ≤ | 0.60 | | 0.27 |
Interest Coverage Ratio | ≥ | 1.5 to 1.0 | | 9.8 to 1.0 |
Investments in Unrestricted Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures | ≤ | $ | 354.6 | | | $ | 1.3 | |
Unsold Housing Units and Model Homes | ≤ | 3,065 | | | 814 | |
Notes Payable - Financial Services.
MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement.The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement is used to finance eligible residential mortgage loans originated by M/I Financial. The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement provides a maximum borrowing availability of $125 million, which increased to $150$160 million during certainfrom September 25, 2020 to October 15, 2020 and increased to $185 million from November 15, 2020 to February 4, 2021, which were periods of increasedexpected increases in the volume of mortgage originations, specifically from September 25, 2017 to October 16, 2017 and from December 15, 2017 to February 2, 2018.originations. The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement expires on June 22, 2018.May 28, 2021. Interest on amounts borrowed under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement is payable at a per annum rate equal to the greaterone-month LIBOR rate (subject to a floor of (1) the floating LIBOR rate1.0%) plus a spread of 237.5200 basis points and (2) 2.75%.points.
As is typical for similar credit facilities in the mortgage origination industry, at closing, the expiration of the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement was set at approximately one year and is under consideration for extension annually by the participating lenders. We expect to extend the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement on or prior to the current expiration date of June 22, 2018,May 28, 2021, but we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to obtain such an extension.
The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement is secured by certain mortgage loans originated by M/I Financial that are being “warehoused” prior to their sale to investors. The MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement provides for limits with respect to certain loan types that can secure outstanding borrowings. There are currently no guarantors of the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement, although M/I Financial may, at its election, designate from time to time any one or more of M/I Financial’s subsidiaries as guarantors.Agreement.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was $128.1$168.1 million outstanding under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and M/I Financial was in compliance with all covenants thereunder. The financial covenants, as more fully described and defined in the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement, are summarized in the following table, which also sets forth M/I Financial’s compliance with such covenants as of December 31, 2017:2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Covenant | | Covenant Requirement | | Actual |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Leverage Ratio | ≤ | 10.0 to 1.0 | | 6.9 to 1.0 |
Liquidity | ≥ | $ | 6.3 | | | $ | 34.6 | |
Adjusted Net Income | > | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 31.6 | |
Tangible Net Worth | ≥ | $ | 12.5 | | | $ | 37.2 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Financial Covenant | | Covenant Requirement | | Actual |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Leverage Ratio | ≤ | 10.0 to 1.0 |
| | 8.5 to 1.0 |
|
Liquidity | ≥ | $ | 6.3 |
| | $ | 16.6 |
|
Adjusted Net Income | > | $ | 0.0 |
| | $ | 12.2 |
|
Tangible Net Worth | ≥ | $ | 12.5 |
| | $ | 21.1 |
|
MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility. The MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility is used to finance eligible residential mortgage loans originated by M/I Financial and is structured as a mortgage repurchase facility. The AgreementMIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility provides for a maximum borrowing availability of $35 million which increased to $50 million from November 15, 2017 through February 1, 2018.$90 million. The MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility expires on October 29, 2018. 25, 2021. As is typical for similar credit facilities in the mortgage origination industry, at closing, the expiration of the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility was set at approximately one year, and is under consideration for extension annually by the participating lender.
M/I Financial pays interest on each advance under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility at a per annum rate equal to the floatingone-month LIBOR rate (subject to a floor of 1.0%) plus 250175 or 275200 basis points depending on the loan type. The covenants in the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility are substantially similar to the covenants in the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement. The MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility provides for limits with respect to certain loan types that can secure outstanding borrowings, which are substantially similar to the restrictions in the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement. There are currently no guarantors of the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was $40.1$57.5 million outstanding under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility. M/I Financial was in compliance with all financial covenants under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Senior Notes.
4.95% Senior Notes. On January 22, 2020, the Company issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2028 Senior Notes. The 2028 Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.95% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year, and mature on February 1, 2028. The 2028 Senior Notes contain covenants substantially similar to the covenants described below for the 2025 Senior Notes, and Convertibleas more fully described and defined in the indenture governing the 2028 Senior Subordinated Notes. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2028 Senior Notes to redeem all of its outstanding 2021 Senior Notes at 100.000% of the principal amount outstanding on January 22, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the Company was in compliance with all terms, conditions, and covenants under the indenture. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the 2028 Senior Notes.
5.625% Senior Notes. In August 2017, the Company issued $250$250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.625%2025 Senior Notes due 2025.Notes. The 2025 Senior Notes contain certain covenants, as more fully described and defined in the indenture governing the 2025 Senior Notes, which limit the ability of the Company and the restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness; make certain payments, including dividends, or repurchase any shares, in an aggregate amount exceeding our “restricted payments basket”; make certain investments; and create or incur certain liens, consolidate or merge with or into other companies, or liquidate or sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets. These covenants are subject to a number of exceptions and qualifications as described in the indenture governing the 2025 Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company was in compliance with all terms, conditions, and covenants under the indenture. Please see See Note 711 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the 2025 Senior Notes.
Supplemental Financial Information.
6.75% Senior Notes. In
As of December
2015, the Company issued $30031, 2020, M/I Homes, Inc. had $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of
6.75%its 2028 Senior Notes
due 2021. The 2021 Senior Notes contain certain covenants, as more fully described and
defined in the indenture governing the 2021 Senior Notes, which limit the ability of the Company and the restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness; make certain payments, including dividends, or repurchase any shares, in an aggregate amount exceeding our “restricted payments basket”; make certain investments; and create or incur certain liens, consolidate or merge with or into other companies, or liquidate or sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets. These covenants are subject to a number of exceptions and qualifications as described in the indenture governing the 2021 Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all terms, conditions, and covenants under the indenture. Please see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the 2021 Senior Notes. 3.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes. In March 2013, the Company issued $86.3$250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% Convertibleits 2025 Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018. outstanding.
The conversion rate initially equals 30.9478 shares per $1,0002028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of their principal amount. This correspondsM/I Homes, Inc.’s subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) with the exception of subsidiaries that are primarily engaged in the business of mortgage financing, title insurance or similar financial businesses relating to an initial conversion price of approximately $32.31 per common share, which equates to approximately 2.7 million common shares. The 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes mature on March 1, 2018. To the extenthomebuilding and home sales business, certain subsidiaries that any of the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes remain outstanding at maturity and are not converted into our common shares, we expect100%-owned by M/I Homes, Inc. or another subsidiary, and other subsidiaries designated as Unrestricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the indentures governing the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes), subject to pay the principal amount of such outstanding notes (plus any accrued and unpaid interest that is due and payable)limitations on the maturity dateaggregate amount invested in such Unrestricted Subsidiaries in accordance with the terms of the indenture from cash on hand and/or amounts available under
our Credit Facility. Please see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes.3.25% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes. On September 11, 2012, the Company issued $57.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017. The 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes were scheduled to mature on September 15, 2017Facility and the deadlineindentures governing the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The Subsidiary Guarantors of the 2028 Senior Notes, the 2025 Senior Notes and the Credit Facility are the same and are listed on Exhibit 22 to this Form 10-K.
Each Subsidiary Guarantor is a direct or indirect 100%-owned subsidiary of M/I Homes, Inc. The guarantees are senior unsecured obligations of each Subsidiary Guarantor and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness of such Subsidiary Guarantor. The guarantees are effectively subordinated to any existing and future secured indebtedness of such Subsidiary Guarantor with respect to any assets comprising security or collateral for holderssuch indebtedness.
The guarantees are “full and unconditional,” as those terms are used in Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10(b)(3), except that the indentures governing the 2028 Senior Notes and the 2025 Senior Notes provide that a Subsidiary Guarantor’s guarantee will be released if: (1) all of the assets of such Subsidiary Guarantor have been sold or otherwise disposed of in a transaction in compliance with the terms of the applicable indenture; (2) all of the Equity Interests (as defined in the applicable indenture) held by M/I Homes, Inc. and the Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the applicable Indenture) of such Subsidiary Guarantor have been sold or otherwise disposed of to convertany person other than M/I Homes, Inc. or a Restricted Subsidiary in a transaction in compliance with the 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes was September 13, 2017. Asterms of the applicable indenture; (3) the Subsidiary Guarantor is designated an Unrestricted Subsidiary (or otherwise ceases to be a resultRestricted Subsidiary (including by way of conversion elections made byliquidation or merger)) in compliance with the terms of the
applicable indenture; (4) M/I Homes, Inc. exercises its legal defeasance option or covenant defeasance option under the applicable indenture; or (5) all obligations under the applicable indenture are discharged in accordance with the terms of the applicable indenture.
The enforceability of the obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantors under their guarantees may be subject to review under applicable federal or state laws relating to fraudulent conveyance or transfer, voidable preference and similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally. In certain circumstances, a court could void the guarantees, subordinate amounts owing under the guarantees or order other relief detrimental to the holders of the 2017 Convertible2028 Senior Subordinated Notes all $57.5 millionand the 2025 Senior Notes.
The following tables present summarized financial information on a combined basis for M/I Homes, Inc. and the Subsidiary Guarantors. Transactions between M/I Homes, Inc. and the Subsidiary Guarantors have been eliminated and the summarized financial information does not reflect M/I Homes, Inc.’s or the Subsidiary Guarantors’ investment in, aggregate principal amountand equity in earnings from, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.
Summarized Balance Sheet Data
| | | | | |
(In thousands) | December 31, 2020 |
Assets: | |
Cash | $ | 223,284 | |
Investment in joint venture arrangements | $ | 33,764 | |
Amounts due from Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | $ | 2,073 | |
Total assets | $ | 2,343,936 | |
| |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | |
| |
Total liabilities | $ | 1,133,884 | |
Shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,210,052 | |
Summarized Statement of
the 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes were converted and settled through the issuance of our common shares. In total we issued approximately 2.4 million common shares (at a conversion price per common share of $23.80). In accordance with the indenture governing the 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes, the Company paid interest on such Notes to but excluding September 15, 2017. Please see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the 2017 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes.Income Data | | | | | |
| Year Ended |
(In thousands) | December 31, 2020 |
Revenues | $ | 2,959,132 | |
Land and housing costs | $ | 2,369,802 | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | $ | 322,072 | |
Income before income taxes | $ | 260,501 | |
Net income | $ | 200,660 | |
Weighted Average Borrowings. In 20172020 and 2016,2019, our weighted average borrowings outstanding were $678.2$767.5 million and $612.5$842.4 million, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.99%5.53% and 5.77%6.17%, respectively. The increasedecrease in our weighted average borrowings primarilyand our weighted average interest rate related to the issuance of our $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2025 in 2017, partially offset by a decrease indecreased borrowings under our Credit Facility in 20172020 compared to 2016 and2019, as well as the conversion of allissuance of our outstanding $57.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 2017 Convertible2028 Senior Subordinated Notes into common shares in September 2017. The increase in our weighted averageon January 22, 2020, which have a lower interest rate was primarily due tothan our newly issued 20252021 Senior Notes noted above.which were redeemed on January 22, 2020.
At December 31, 2017,2020, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.Facility, a decrease from $66.0 million of outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2019. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2020, the company used the Credit Facility for investment in land and land development, construction of homes, operating expenses, working capital requirements and share repurchases under our 2018 Share Repurchase Program. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, the average daily amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $76.0$17.3 million and the maximum amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $187.7$111.3 million. Based on our currentcurrently anticipated spending on home construction, overhead expenses, and land acquisition and development in 2018,2021, offset by expected cash receipts from home deliveries and other sources, we expect to continue tomay borrow under the Credit Facility during 2018, with an estimated2021, but do not expect the peak amount outstanding not expected to exceed $100 million (excluding any borrowings under the Credit Facility used to repay the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes at maturity).million. The actual amount borrowed in 20182021 (and the estimated peak amount outstanding) and the related timing arewill be subject to numerous factors, includingwhich are subject to significant variation as a result of the timing and amount of land and house construction expenditures, payroll and other general and administrative expenses, and cash receipts from home deliveries,deliveries. The amount borrowed will also be impacted by other cash receipts and payments, any capital markets transactions or other additional financings by the Company, any repayments or redemptions of outstanding debt, (including any repayments at maturity ofadditional share repurchases under the 2018 Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes)Share Repurchase Program and any other extraordinary events or transactions.transactions, including the uncertain effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company may also experience significant variation in cash and Credit Facility balances from week to week due to the timing of such receipts and payments.
There were $49.0$61.0 million of letters of credit issued and outstanding under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2017.2020. During 2017,2020, the average daily amount of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility was $40.7$66.9 million and the maximum amount of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility was $50.2$69.9 million.
At December 31, 2017,2020, M/I Financial had $128.1$168.1 million outstanding under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement. During 2017,2020, the average daily amount outstanding under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement was $50.7$37.4 million and the maximum amount outstanding was $128.1$168.1 million, which occurred during December, while the temporary increase provision was in effect and the maximum borrowing availability was $150.0$185.0 million.
At December 31, 2017,2020, M/I Financial had $40.1$57.5 million outstanding under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility. During 2017,2020, the average daily amount outstanding under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility was $16.9$39.2 million and the maximum amount outstanding was $40.1$69.8 million, which occurred during December, while the temporary increase provision was in effect and the maximum borrowing availability was $50.0 million.December.
Preferred Shares. On October 16, 2017, we redeemed all 2,000 outstanding Series A Preferred Shares (and the 2,000,000 related depositary shares) for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $50.4 million. Prior to redemption, dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares were non-cumulative, if declared by us, were paid at an annual rate of 9.75% and were payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15. Pursuant to the terms of the Series A Preferred Shares, Series A Preferred Shares that have been redeemed have the status of authorized and unissued preferred shares of the Company undesignated as to series and may be redesignated and reissued as part of any series of preferred shares.
We declared and paid a quarterly dividend of $609.375 per share on our Series A Preferred Shares for the first three quarters in 2017 and for each quarter in 2016 for aggregate dividend payments of $3.7 million and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Universal Shelf Registration. In October 2016,June 2019, the Company filed a $400 million universal shelf registration statement with the SEC, which registration statement became effective on November 9, 2016upon filing and will expire in November 2019.June 2022. Pursuant to the registration statement, the Company may, from time to time, offer debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, depositary shares, warrants to purchase debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, depositary shares or units of two or more of those securities, rights to purchase debt securities, common shares, preferred shares or depositary shares, stock purchase contracts and units. The timing and amount of offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Included in the table below is a summary, as of December 31, 2017,2020, of future cash requirements under the Company’s contractual obligations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments due by period |
| | Less Than | 1 - 3 | 3 - 5 | More than |
(In thousands) | Total | 1 year | Years | Years | 5 years |
Notes payable bank – homebuilding operations (a) | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Notes payable bank – financial services (b) | 225,789 | | 225,789 | | — | | — | | — | |
Notes payable – other (including interest) | 4,279 | | 2,847 | | 1,353 | | 79 | | — | |
Senior notes (including interest) | 868,318 | | 33,863 | | 67,725 | | 317,725 | | 449,005 | |
| | | | | |
Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned (c) | 9,914 | | 9,914 | | — | | — | | — | |
Operating leases | 40,245 | | 8,629 | | 13,797 | | 7,933 | | 9,886 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total | $ | 1,148,545 | | $ | 281,042 | | $ | 82,875 | | $ | 325,737 | | $ | 458,891 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments due by period |
| | Less Than | 1 - 3 | 3 - 5 | More than |
(In thousands) | Total | 1 year | Years | Years | 5 years |
Notes payable bank – homebuilding operations (a) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Notes payable bank – financial services (b) | 168,474 |
| 168,474 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Notes payable – other (including interest) | 11,566 |
| 5,940 |
| 3,318 |
| 2,308 |
| — |
|
Senior notes (including interest) | 730,766 |
| 34,234 |
| 68,625 |
| 335,719 |
| 292,188 |
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes (including interest) | 87,544 |
| 87,544 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned (c) | 21,545 |
| 21,545 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Operating leases | 24,951 |
| 5,760 |
| 8,205 |
| 7,144 |
| 3,842 |
|
Total | $ | 1,044,846 |
| $ | 323,497 |
| $ | 80,148 |
| $ | 345,171 |
| $ | 296,030 |
|
(a)At December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility is payable at a rate which is adjusted daily and is equal to the sum of the one month LIBOR rate (subject to a floor of 0.75%) plus a margin of 250 basis points. The margin is subject to adjustment in subsequent quarterly periods based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Interest payments by period will be based upon the outstanding borrowings and the applicable interest rate(s) in effect. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.(b)Borrowings under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement are at the one-month LIBOR rate (subject to a floor of 1.0%) plus a spread of 200 basis points. Borrowings under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility are at the one-month LIBOR rate (subject to a floor of 1.0%) plus 175 or 200 basis points, depending on the loan type. Total borrowings outstanding under both agreements at December 31, 2020 had a weighted average interest rate of 3.0%. Interest payments by period will be based upon the outstanding borrowings and the applicable interest rate(s) in effect.
| |
(a) | At December 31, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. |
| |
(b) | Borrowings under the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement are at the greater of (1) the floating LIBOR rate plus a spread of 237.5 basis points and (2) 2.75%. Borrowings under the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility are at the floating LIBOR rate plus 250 or 275 basis points, depending on the loan type. Total borrowings outstanding under both agreements at December 31, 2017 had a weighted average interest rate of 3.9%. Interest payments by period will be based upon the outstanding borrowings and the applicable interest rate(s) in effect. |
| |
(c) | The Company is party to seven land purchase agreements in which the Company has specific performance requirements. The future amounts payable related to these seven land purchase agreements is the number of lots the Company is obligated to purchase at the lot price set forth in the agreement. The time period in which these payments will be made is the Company’s best estimate of when these lots will be purchased. |
(c)The Company is party to certain land purchase agreements in which the Company has specific performance requirements. The future amounts payable related to these land purchase agreements is the number of lots the Company is obligated to purchase at the lot price set forth in the agreement. In addition, the amount of deposits and prepaid acquisition and development costs on certain land purchase agreements have exceeded thresholds relative to the remaining purchase price of the lots for those agreements, such that the remaining purchase price of the lots is recorded as an Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In each case, the time period in which these payments will be made is the Company’s best estimate of when these lots will be purchased.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Reference is made to Notes 1, 6, 7, and 8 in the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These Notes discuss our off-balance sheet arrangements with respect to land acquisition contracts and option agreements, and land development joint ventures, including the nature and amounts of financial obligations relating to these items. In addition, these Notes discuss the nature and amounts of certain types of commitments that arise in the ordinary course of our land development and homebuilding operations, including commitments of land development joint ventures for which we might be obligated. Our off-balance sheet arrangements relating to our homebuilding operations include joint venture arrangements, land option agreements, guarantees and indemnifications associated with acquiring and developing land, and the issuance of letters of credit
and completion bonds. Our use of these arrangements is for the purpose of securing the most desirable lots on which to build homes for our homebuyers in a manner that we believe reduces the overall risk to the Company. Additionally, in the ordinary course of its business, M/I Financial issues guarantees and indemnities relating to the sale of loans to third parties.
INTEREST RATES AND INFLATION
Our business is significantly affected by general economic conditions within the United States and, particularly, by the impact of interest rates and inflation. Inflation can have a long-term impact on us because increasing costs of land, materials and labor can result in a need to increase the sales prices of homes. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which can have a negative impact on housing demand and the costs of financing land development activities and housing construction. Higher interest rates also may decrease our potential market by making it more difficult for homebuyers to qualify for mortgages or to obtain mortgages at interest rates that are acceptable to them. The impact of increased rates can be offset, in part, by offering variable rate loans with lower interest rates. In conjunction with our mortgage financing services, hedging methods are used to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations between the commitment date of the loan and the time the loan closes. Rising interest rates, as well as increased materials and labor costs, may reduce gross margins. An increase in material and labor costs is particularly a problem during a period of declining home prices. Conversely, deflation can impact the value of real estate and
make it difficult for us to recover our land costs. Therefore, either inflation or deflation could adversely impact our future results of operations.
Seasonality and Variability in Quarterly Results
Typically, our homebuilding operations experience significant seasonality and quarter-to-quarter variability in homebuilding activity levels. In general, homes delivered increase substantially in the second half of the year compared to the first half of the year. We believe that this seasonality reflects the tendency of homebuyers to shop for a new home in the spring with the goal of closing in the fall or winter, as well as the scheduling of construction to accommodate seasonal weather conditions. Our financial services operations also experience seasonality because loan originations correspond with the delivery of homes in our homebuilding operations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| December 31, 2017 | September 30, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2017 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
Revenue | $ | 621,702 |
| $ | 476,423 |
| $ | 456,866 |
| $ | 406,980 |
|
Unit data: | |
| |
| |
| |
|
New contracts | 1,220 |
| 1,225 |
| 1,400 |
| 1,454 |
|
Homes delivered | 1,584 |
| 1,256 |
| 1,211 |
| 1,038 |
|
Backlog at end of period | 2,014 |
| 2,378 |
| 2,409 |
| 2,220 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| December 31, 2016 | September 30, 2016 | June 30, 2016 | March 31, 2016 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
Revenue | $ | 523,246 |
| $ | 442,464 |
| $ | 401,247 |
| $ | 324,370 |
|
Unit data: | |
| |
| |
| |
|
New contracts | 999 |
| 1,088 |
| 1,354 |
| 1,314 |
|
Homes delivered | 1,416 |
| 1,148 |
| 1,042 |
| 876 |
|
Backlog at end of period | 1,804 |
| 2,221 |
| 2,281 |
| 1,969 |
|
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary market risk results from fluctuations in interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk through borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, consisting of the Credit Facility, the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement, and the MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility which permitpermitted borrowings of up to $675$775 million at December 31, 2017,2020, subject to availability constraints. Additionally, M/I Financial is exposed to interest rate risk associated with its mortgage loan origination services.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments: Interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) are extended to certain homebuying customers who have applied for a mortgage loan and meet certain defined credit and underwriting criteria. Typically, the IRLCs will have a duration of less than six months; however, in certain markets, the duration could extend to twelvenine months.
Some IRLCs are committed to a specific third party investor through the use of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments matching the exact terms of the IRLC loan. Uncommitted IRLCs are considered derivative instruments and are fair value adjusted, with the resulting gain or loss recorded in current earnings.
Forward Sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities: Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (“FMBSs”) are used to protect uncommitted IRLC loans against the risk of changes in interest rates between the lock date and the funding date. FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs are classified and accounted for as non-designated derivative instruments and are recorded at fair value, with gains and losses recorded in current earnings.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of single-family residential loans collateralized by the underlying property. During the period between when a loan is closed and when it is sold to an investor, the interest rate risk is covered through the use of a best-effortswhole loan contract or by FMBSs. The FMBSs are classified and accounted for as non-designated derivative instruments, with gains and losses recorded in current earnings.
The table below shows the notional amounts of our financial instruments at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Whole loan contracts and related committed IRLCs | $ | 2,354 | | | $ | 1,445 | |
Uncommitted IRLCs | 208,500 | | | 87,340 | |
FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs | 183,000 | | | 88,000 | |
Whole loan contracts and related mortgage loans held for sale | 78,142 | | | 6,125 | |
FMBSs related to mortgage loans held for sale | 131,000 | | | 144,000 | |
Mortgage loans held for sale covered by FMBSs | 148,331 | | | 144,411 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
Best-effort contracts and related committed IRLCs | $ | 2,182 |
| | $ | 6,607 |
|
Uncommitted IRLCs | 50,746 |
| | 66,875 |
|
FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs | 53,000 |
| | 66,000 |
|
Best-effort contracts and related mortgage loans held for sale | 80,956 |
| | 125,348 |
|
FMBSs related to mortgage loans held for sale | 91,000 |
| | 33,000 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale covered by FMBSs | 90,781 |
| | 32,870 |
|
The table below shows the measurement of assets and liabilities at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 234,293 | | | $ | 155,244 | |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | (1,640) | | | (336) | |
Interest rate lock commitments | 1,664 | | | 654 | |
Whole loan contracts | (422) | | | (16) | |
Total | $ | 233,895 | | | $ | 155,546 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 171,580 |
| | $ | 154,020 |
|
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | 177 |
| | 230 |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | 271 |
| | 250 |
|
Best-efforts contracts | 12 |
| | (90 | ) |
Total | $ | 172,040 |
| | $ | 154,410 |
|
The following table sets forth the amount of gain (loss) recognized on assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
Description (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 318 | | | $ | (2,261) | | | $ | 3,763 | |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | (1,304) | | | 2,969 | | | (3,482) | |
Interest rate lock commitments | 964 | | | (370) | | | 783 | |
Whole loan contracts | (360) | | | 173 | | | (231) | |
Total (loss) gain recognized | $ | (382) | | | $ | 511 | | | $ | 833 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
Description (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 3,675 |
| | $ | (3,591 | ) | | $ | (590 | ) |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | (53 | ) | | 323 |
| | 89 |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | 21 |
| | (71 | ) | | 32 |
|
Best-efforts contracts | 102 |
| | 116 |
| | (258 | ) |
Total gain (loss) recognized | $ | 3,745 |
| | $ | (3,223 | ) | | $ | (727 | ) |
The following table provides the expected future cash flows and current fair values of borrowings under our credit facilities and mortgage loan origination services that are subject to market risk as interest rates fluctuate, as of December 31, 2017.2020. Because the MIF Mortgage Warehousing Agreement and MIF Mortgage Repurchase Facility are effectively secured by certain mortgage loans held for sale which are typically sold within 30 to 45 days, their outstanding balances are included in the most current period presented. The interest rates for our variable rate debt represent the weighted average interest rates in effect at December 31, 2017.2020. For fixed-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value of the debt instrument, but not our earnings or cash flow. Conversely, for variable-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not affect the fair market value of the debt instrument, but do affect our earnings and cash flow. We do not have the obligation to prepay fixed-rate debt prior to maturity, and, as a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on our fixed-rate debt until we are required or elect to refinance it.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Expected Cash Flows by Period | | Fair Value |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | Thereafter | | Total | | 12/31/2020 |
ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loans held for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate | $241,139 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $241,139 | | $233,705 |
Weighted average interest rate | 2.74% | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2.74% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt — fixed rate | $956 | | $953 | | $304 | | $77 | | $250,000 | | $400,000 | | $652,290 | | $682,337 |
Weighted average interest rate | 5.63% | | 5.63% | | 5.63% | | 5.63% | | 5.63% | | 4.95% | | 5.21% | | |
Short-term debt — variable rate | $225,634 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $225,634 | | $225,634 |
Weighted average interest rate | 3.00% | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3.00% | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Expected Cash Flows by Period | | Fair Value |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter | | Total | | 12/31/2017 |
ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loans held for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate | $172,050 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $172,050 | | $167,125 |
Weighted average interest rate | 3.96% | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3.96% | | |
Variable rate | $4,544 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $4,544 | | $4,455 |
Weighted average interest rate | 3.48% | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3.48% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt — fixed rate | $88,766 | | $1,213 | | $1,693 | | $301,319 | | $866 | | $250,000 | | $643,857 | | $663,561 |
Weighted average interest rate | 3.20% | | 5.42% | | 5.42% | | 6.71% | | 5.75% | | 5.63% | | 5.80% | | |
Short-term debt — variable rate | $168,195 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $168,195 | | $168,195 |
Weighted average interest rate | 3.87% | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3.87% | | |
| |
Item 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of M/I Homes, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of M/I Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"“financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 16, 2018,19, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidatedCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Inventory - Refer to Notes 1, 3 and 4 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
Inventory includes the costs of land acquisition, land development and home construction, capitalized interest, real estate taxes, direct overhead costs incurred during development and home construction, and common costs that benefit the entire community, less impairments, if any. Inventory is recorded at cost, unless events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the inventory is impaired, at which point the inventory is written down to fair value. Management assesses inventory for recoverability on a quarterly basis to determine if events or changes in local or national economic conditions indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The inventory balance was $1.92 billion and $1.77 billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
In conducting the review for impairment indicators, management evaluates certain qualitative and quantitative factors at the community level. This includes, among other things, margins on sales contracts in backlog; the margins on homes that have
been delivered; expected changes in margins with regard to future home sales over the life of the community and with regard to future land sales; the value of the land itself as well as any results from third-party appraisals; selling strategies; or alternative land uses (including disposition of all or a portion of the land owned).
Given the subjectivity in determining whether qualitative or quantitative impairment indicators are present for a community, management exercises significant judgment in the identification of whether impairment indicators are present. Accordingly, auditing management’s assessment of impairment indicators requires a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the Company’s identification of impairment indicators for inventory included the following, among others:
•We tested the operating effectiveness of controls over management’s evaluation of impairment indicators.
•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s assessment of impairment indicators by:
◦Evaluating management's process for identifying qualitative impairment indicators by community and whether management appropriately considered such indicators.
◦Evaluating management's process for identifying quantitative impairment indicators by community and whether management appropriately considered such indicators.
◦Conducting a completeness assessment to determine whether additional impairment indicators were present during the period that were not identified by management.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 16, 201819, 2021
We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 1976.
M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 3,046,145 | | | $ | 2,500,290 | | | $ | 2,286,282 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Land and housing | 2,361,367 | | | 2,005,861 | | | 1,836,704 | |
Impairment of inventory and investment in joint venture arrangements | 8,435 | | | 5,002 | | | 5,809 | |
General and administrative | 177,547 | | | 147,954 | | | 137,779 | |
Selling | 179,535 | | | 154,384 | | | 142,829 | |
Acquisition and integration costs | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,700 | |
Equity in income from joint venture arrangements | (466) | | | (311) | | | (312) | |
Interest | 9,684 | | | 21,375 | | | 20,484 | |
| | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | $ | 2,736,102 | | | $ | 2,334,265 | | | $ | 2,144,993 | |
| | | | | |
Income before income taxes | 310,043 | | | 166,025 | | | 141,289 | |
| | | | | |
Provision for income taxes | 70,169 | | | 38,438 | | | 33,626 | |
| | | | | |
Net income | $ | 239,874 | | | $ | 127,587 | | | $ | 107,663 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Earnings per common share: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 8.38 | | | $ | 4.58 | | | $ | 3.81 | |
Diluted | $ | 8.23 | | | $ | 4.48 | | | $ | 3.70 | |
| | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | |
Basic | 28,610 | | | 27,846 | | | 28,234 | |
Diluted | 29,152 | | | 28,475 | | | 29,178 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 1,961,971 |
| | $ | 1,691,327 |
| | $ | 1,418,395 |
|
Costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Land and housing | 1,561,022 |
| | 1,358,183 |
| | 1,114,663 |
|
Impairment of inventory and investment in joint venture arrangements | 7,681 |
| | 3,992 |
| | 3,638 |
|
General and administrative | 126,282 |
| | 111,600 |
| | 93,208 |
|
Selling | 128,327 |
| | 108,809 |
| | 95,092 |
|
Equity in income of joint venture arrangements | (539 | ) | | (640 | ) | | (498 | ) |
Interest | 18,874 |
| | 17,598 |
| | 17,521 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | — |
| | 7,842 |
|
Total costs and expenses | $ | 1,841,647 |
| | $ | 1,599,542 |
| | $ | 1,331,466 |
|
| | | | | |
Income before income taxes | 120,324 |
| | 91,785 |
| | 86,929 |
|
| | | | | |
Provision from income taxes | 48,243 |
| | 35,176 |
| | 35,166 |
|
| | | | | |
Net income | $ | 72,081 |
| | $ | 56,609 |
| | $ | 51,763 |
|
| | | | | |
Preferred dividends | 3,656 |
| | 4,875 |
| | 4,875 |
|
Excess of fair value over book value of preferred shares redeemed | 2,257 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | |
Net income to common shareholders | $ | 66,168 |
| | $ | 51,734 |
| | $ | 46,888 |
|
| | | | | |
Earnings per common share: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 2.57 |
| | $ | 2.10 |
| | $ | 1.91 |
|
Diluted | $ | 2.26 |
| | $ | 1.84 |
| | $ | 1.68 |
|
| | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | |
Basic | 25,769 |
| | 24,666 |
| | 24,575 |
|
Diluted | 30,688 |
| | 30,116 |
| | 30,047 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands, except par values) | | 2017 | | 2016 | (Dollars in thousands, except par values) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | |
ASSETS: | | | | | ASSETS: | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | $ | 151,703 |
| | $ | 34,441 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | $ | 260,810 | | | $ | 6,083 | |
Mortgage loans held for sale | | 171,580 |
| | 154,020 |
| Mortgage loans held for sale | | 234,293 | | | 155,244 | |
Inventory | | 1,414,574 |
| | 1,215,934 |
| Inventory | | 1,916,608 | | | 1,769,507 | |
Property and equipment - net | | 26,816 |
| | 22,299 |
| Property and equipment - net | | 26,612 | | | 22,118 | |
Investment in joint venture arrangements | | 20,525 |
| | 28,016 |
| Investment in joint venture arrangements | | 34,673 | | | 37,885 | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets | | Operating lease right-of-use assets | | 52,291 | | | 18,415 | |
Deferred income tax asset | | 18,438 |
| | 30,875 |
| Deferred income tax asset | | 6,183 | | | 9,631 | |
Goodwill | | Goodwill | | 16,400 | | | 16,400 | |
Other assets | | 61,135 |
| | 62,926 |
| Other assets | | 95,175 | | | 70,311 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 1,864,771 |
| | $ | 1,548,511 |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 2,643,045 | | | $ | 2,105,594 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | LIABILITIES: | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 117,233 |
| | $ | 103,212 |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 185,669 | | | $ | 125,026 | |
Customer deposits | | 26,378 |
| | 22,156 |
| Customer deposits | | 72,635 | | | 34,462 | |
Operating lease liabilities | | Operating lease liabilities | | 52,474 | | | 18,415 | |
Other liabilities | | 131,534 |
| | 123,162 |
| Other liabilities | | 183,583 | | | 147,937 | |
Community development district obligations | | 13,049 |
| | 476 |
| Community development district obligations | | 8,196 | | | 13,531 | |
Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned | | 21,545 |
| | 7,528 |
| Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned | | 9,914 | | | 7,934 | |
Notes payable bank - homebuilding operations | | — |
| | 40,300 |
| Notes payable bank - homebuilding operations | | 0 | | | 66,000 | |
Notes payable bank - financial services operations | | 168,195 |
| | 152,895 |
| Notes payable bank - financial services operations | | 225,634 | | | 136,904 | |
Notes payable - other | | 10,576 |
| | 6,415 |
| Notes payable - other | | 4,072 | | | 5,828 | |
Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2017 - net | | — |
| | 57,093 |
| |
Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2018 - net | | 86,132 |
| | 85,423 |
| |
Senior notes due 2021 - net | | 296,780 |
| | 295,677 |
| Senior notes due 2021 - net | | 0 | | | 298,988 | |
Senior notes due 2025 - net | | 246,051 |
| | — |
| Senior notes due 2025 - net | | 247,613 | | | 247,092 | |
Senior notes due 2028 - net | | Senior notes due 2028 - net | | 394,557 | | | 0 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 1,117,473 |
| | $ | 894,337 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 1,384,347 | | | $ | 1,102,117 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | | — |
| | — |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | | | | | SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |
Preferred shares - $.01 par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; 2,000 shares both issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 48,163 |
| |
Common shares - $.01 par value; authorized 58,000,000 shares at both December 31, 2017 and 2016; issued 29,508,626 and 27,092,723 shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016 | | 295 |
| | 271 |
| |
| Common shares - $0.01 par value; authorized 58,000,000 shares at both December 31, 2020 and 2019; issued 30,137,141 shares at both December 31, 2020 and 2019 | | Common shares - $0.01 par value; authorized 58,000,000 shares at both December 31, 2020 and 2019; issued 30,137,141 shares at both December 31, 2020 and 2019 | | $ | 301 | | | $ | 301 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 306,483 |
| | 246,549 |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 339,001 | | | 332,861 | |
Retained earnings | | 473,329 |
| | 407,161 |
| Retained earnings | | 948,453 | | | 708,579 | |
Treasury shares - at cost - 1,651,874 and 2,415,290 shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively | | (32,809 | ) | | (47,970 | ) | |
Treasury shares - at cost - 1,323,292 and 1,750,685 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | Treasury shares - at cost - 1,323,292 and 1,750,685 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | (29,057) | | | (38,264) | |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 747,298 |
| | $ | 654,174 |
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 1,258,698 | | | $ | 1,003,477 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 1,864,771 |
| | $ | 1,548,511 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 2,643,045 | | | $ | 2,105,594 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common Shares | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Shares Outstanding | | | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Treasury Shares | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | Amount | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2017 | | | | | 27,856,752 | | | $ | 295 | | | $ | 306,483 | | | $ | 473,329 | | | $ | (32,809) | | | $ | 747,298 | |
Net income | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 107,663 | | | — | | | 107,663 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common share issuance for conversion of convertible notes | | | | | 628,515 | | | 6 | | | 20,303 | | | — | | | — | | | 20,309 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase of common shares | | | | | (1,069,043) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (25,709) | | | (25,709) | |
Stock options exercised | | | | | 38,628 | | | — | | | (254) | | | — | | | 792 | | | 538 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | | | — | | | — | | | 5,974 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,974 | |
Deferral of executive and director compensation | | | | | — | | | — | | | 185 | | | — | | | — | | | 185 | |
Executive and director deferred compensation distributions | | | | | 61,366 | | | — | | | (2,174) | | | — | | | 1,219 | | | (955) | |
Balance at December 31, 2018 | | | | | 27,516,218 | | | $ | 301 | | | $ | 330,517 | | | $ | 580,992 | | | $ | (56,507) | | | $ | 855,303 | |
Net income | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 127,587 | | | — | | | 127,587 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase of common shares | | | | | (201,088) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5,150) | | | (5,150) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options exercised | | | | | 954,370 | | | — | | | (1,204) | | | — | | | 20,848 | | | 19,644 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | | | — | | | — | | | 5,846 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,846 | |
Deferral of executive and director compensation | | | | | — | | | — | | | 247 | | | — | | | — | | | 247 | |
Executive and director deferred compensation distributions | | | | | 116,956 | | | — | | | (2,545) | | | — | | | 2,545 | | | 0 | |
Balance at December 31, 2019 | | | | | 28,386,456 | | | $ | 301 | | | $ | 332,861 | | | $ | 708,579 | | | $ | (38,264) | | | $ | 1,003,477 | |
Net income | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 239,874 | | | — | | | 239,874 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase of common shares | | | | | (80,000) | | | | | — | | | — | | | (1,912) | | | (1,912) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options exercised | | | | | 422,820 | | | — | | | 636 | | | — | | | 9,270 | | | 9,906 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | | | — | | | — | | | 7,138 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,138 | |
Deferral of executive and director compensation | | | | | — | | | — | | | 215 | | | — | | | — | | | 215 | |
Executive and director deferred compensation distributions | | | | | 84,573 | | | — | | | (1,849) | | | — | | | 1,849 | | | 0 | |
Balance at December 31, 2020 | | | | | 28,813,849 | | | $ | 301 | | | $ | 339,001 | | | $ | 948,453 | | | $ | (29,057) | | | $ | 1,258,698 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred Shares | | Common Shares | | | | | | | | |
| Shares Outstanding | | | | Shares Outstanding | | | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Treasury Shares | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | Amount | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | 2,000 |
| | $ | 48,163 |
| | 24,512,910 |
| | $ | 271 |
| | $ | 238,560 |
| | $ | 308,539 |
| | $ | (51,238 | ) | | $ | 544,295 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 51,763 |
| | — |
| | 51,763 |
|
Dividends declared to preferred shareholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,875 | ) | | — |
| | (4,875 | ) |
Stock options exercised | — |
| | — |
| | 72,640 |
| | — |
| | (408 | ) | | — |
| | 1,443 |
| | 1,035 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,942 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,942 |
|
Deferral of executive and director compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 406 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 406 |
|
Executive and director deferred compensation distributions | — |
| | — |
| | 63,494 |
| | — |
| | (1,261 | ) | | — |
| | 1,261 |
| | — |
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 | 2,000 |
| | $ | 48,163 |
| | 24,649,044 |
| | $ | 271 |
| | $ | 241,239 |
| | $ | 355,427 |
| | $ | (48,534 | ) | | $ | 596,566 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 56,609 |
| | — |
| | 56,609 |
|
Dividends declared to preferred shareholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,875 | ) | | — |
| | (4,875 | ) |
Stock options exercised | — |
| | — |
| | 14,600 |
| | — |
| | (108 | ) | | — |
| | 290 |
| | 182 |
|
Reversal of deferred tax asset related to stock options and executive deferred compensation distributions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 269 |
| | | | — |
| | 269 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,315 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,315 |
|
Deferral of executive and director compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 108 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 108 |
|
Executive and director deferred compensation distributions | — |
| | — |
| | 13,789 |
| | — |
| | (274 | ) | | — |
| | 274 |
| | — |
|
Balance at December 31, 2016 | 2,000 |
| | $ | 48,163 |
| | 24,677,433 |
| | $ | 271 |
| | $ | 246,549 |
| | $ | 407,161 |
| | $ | (47,970 | ) | | $ | 654,174 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 72,081 |
| | — |
| | 72,081 |
|
Fair value over carrying value of preferred shares redeemed | — |
| | 2,257 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,257 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Dividends declared to preferred shareholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,656 | ) | | — |
| | (3,656 | ) |
Common share issuance for conversion of convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | 2,415,903 |
| | 24 |
| | 57,476 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 57,500 |
|
Preferred shares redeemed | (2,000 | ) | | (50,420 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (50,420 | ) |
Stock options exercised | — |
| | — |
| | 678,781 |
| | — |
| | (2,255 | ) | | — |
| | 13,480 |
| | 11,225 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,044 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,044 |
|
Deferral of executive and director compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 350 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 350 |
|
Executive and director deferred compensation distributions | — |
| | — |
| | 84,635 |
| | — |
| | (1,681 | ) | | — |
| | 1,681 |
| | — |
|
Balance at December 31, 2017 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 27,856,752 |
| | $ | 295 |
| | $ | 306,483 |
| | $ | 473,329 |
| | $ | (32,809 | ) | | $ | 747,298 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | (Dollars in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
Net income | $ | 72,081 |
| | $ | 56,609 |
| | $ | 51,763 |
| Net income | $ | 239,874 | | | $ | 127,587 | | | $ | 107,663 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation adjustments and abandoned land transaction write-offs | 7,681 |
| | 3,992 |
| | 3,638 |
| |
Equity in income of joint venture arrangements | (539 | ) | | (640 | ) | | (498 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | |
Impairment of inventory and investment in joint venture arrangements | | Impairment of inventory and investment in joint venture arrangements | 8,435 | | | 5,002 | | | 5,809 | |
| Equity in income from joint venture arrangements | | Equity in income from joint venture arrangements | (466) | | | (311) | | | (312) | |
| Mortgage loan originations | (1,078,520 | ) | | (969,690 | ) | | (807,986 | ) | Mortgage loan originations | (1,843,576) | | | (1,382,695) | | | (1,200,474) | |
Net gain from property disposals | | Net gain from property disposals | 0 | | | (448) | | | 0 | |
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans | 1,064,635 |
| | 939,080 |
| | 773,189 |
| Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans | 1,764,845 | | | 1,394,841 | | | 1,206,167 | |
Fair value adjustment of mortgage loans held for sale | (3,675 | ) | | 3,591 |
| | 590 |
| Fair value adjustment of mortgage loans held for sale | (318) | | | 2,261 | | | (3,764) | |
Capitalization of originated mortgage servicing rights | (5,005 | ) | | (5,569 | ) | | (4,726 | ) | Capitalization of originated mortgage servicing rights | (6,048) | | | (4,684) | | | (4,550) | |
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights | 1,069 |
| | 1,652 |
| | 1,010 |
| Amortization of mortgage servicing rights | 2,427 | | | 1,547 | | | 784 | |
Gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights | | Gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights | (33) | | | 0 | | | (1,224) | |
Depreciation | 9,630 |
| | 8,552 |
| | 6,612 |
| Depreciation | 12,636 | | | 11,691 | | | 10,956 | |
Amortization of debt discount and debt issue costs | 3,475 |
| | 3,402 |
| | 3,306 |
| Amortization of debt discount and debt issue costs | 2,515 | | | 2,712 | | | 2,791 | |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, including transaction costs | — |
| | — |
| | 2,883 |
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt, including transaction costs | 950 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Payment of original issue discount on redemption of senior notes | — |
| | — |
| | (3,126 | ) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 6,044 |
| | 5,315 |
| | 3,942 |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 7,138 | | | 5,846 | | | 5,974 | |
Deferred income tax expense | 12,437 |
| | 31,311 |
| | 32,526 |
| Deferred income tax expense | 3,448 | | | 3,851 | | | 4,957 | |
| Change in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | Change in assets and liabilities: | |
Inventory | (168,622 | ) | | (83,775 | ) | | (159,011 | ) | Inventory | (134,941) | | | (88,358) | | | (157,573) | |
Other assets | (186 | ) | | (13,643 | ) | | (6,296 | ) | Other assets | (17,253) | | | (2,072) | | | 2,044 | |
Accounts payable | 14,021 |
| | 16,334 |
| | 9,827 |
| Accounts payable | 60,643 | | | (6,485) | | | 3,750 | |
Customer deposits | 4,222 |
| | 2,589 |
| | 3,458 |
| Customer deposits | 38,173 | | | 2,407 | | | 1,521 | |
Accrued compensation | 2,338 |
| | 4,853 |
| | 1,861 |
| Accrued compensation | 9,420 | | | 3,944 | | | 3,486 | |
Other liabilities | 6,384 |
| | 30,234 |
| | 4,673 |
| Other liabilities | 20,465 | | | (11,005) | | | 9,403 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (52,530 | ) | | 34,197 |
| | (82,365 | ) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 168,334 | | | 65,631 | | | (2,592) | |
| | | | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |
Purchase of property and equipment | (8,799 | ) | | (13,106 | ) | | (3,659 | ) | Purchase of property and equipment | (11,677) | | | (4,526) | | | (8,141) | |
Acquisition, net of cash acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (23,950 | ) | |
Acquisition | | Acquisition | 0 | | | 0 | | | (100,960) | |
Return of capital from joint venture arrangements | 3,518 |
| | 3,207 |
| | 1,226 |
| Return of capital from joint venture arrangements | 2,477 | | | 812 | | | 676 | |
Investment in joint venture arrangements | (12,088 | ) | | (21,746 | ) | | (18,162 | ) | |
Net proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights | 7,558 |
| | — |
| | 3,065 |
| |
Investment in and advances to joint venture arrangements | | Investment in and advances to joint venture arrangements | (28,539) | | | (30,188) | | | (31,867) | |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights | | Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights | 3,869 | | | 0 | | | 6,335 | |
| Proceeds from sale of property | | Proceeds from sale of property | 0 | | | 6,308 | | | 0 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,811 | ) | | (31,645 | ) | | (41,480 | ) | Net cash used in investing activities | (33,870) | | | (27,594) | | | (133,957) | |
| | | | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |
Repayment of senior notes, net of original issue discount | — |
| | — |
| | (226,874 | ) | |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes | 250,000 |
| | — |
| | 300,000 |
| |
Repayment of senior notes due 2021 | | Repayment of senior notes due 2021 | (300,000) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Net proceeds from issuance of senior notes due 2028 | | Net proceeds from issuance of senior notes due 2028 | 400,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Repayment of convertible senior subordinated notes | | Repayment of convertible senior subordinated notes | 0 | | | 0 | | | (65,941) | |
| Proceeds from bank borrowings - homebuilding operations | 398,300 |
| | 351,500 |
| | 417,300 |
| Proceeds from bank borrowings - homebuilding operations | 306,800 | | | 696,500 | | | 666,600 | |
Repayment of bank borrowings - homebuilding operations | (438,600 | ) | | (355,000 | ) | | (403,500 | ) | |
Net proceeds from bank borrowings - financial services operations | 15,300 |
| | 29,247 |
| | 38,269 |
| |
Proceeds from (principal repayment of) notes payable-other and community development district bond obligations | 4,161 |
| | (2,026 | ) | | (1,077 | ) | |
Redemption of preferred shares | (50,420 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| |
Dividends paid on preferred shares | (3,656 | ) | | (4,875 | ) | | (4,875 | ) | |
Repayments of bank borrowings - homebuilding operations | | Repayments of bank borrowings - homebuilding operations | (372,800) | | | (747,900) | | | (549,200) | |
Net proceeds from (net repayments of) bank borrowings - financial services operations | | Net proceeds from (net repayments of) bank borrowings - financial services operations | 88,730 | | | (16,264) | | | (15,027) | |
Principal repayments of notes payable-other and community development district bond obligations | | Principal repayments of notes payable-other and community development district bond obligations | (1,756) | | | (110) | | | (4,638) | |
Repurchase of common shares | | Repurchase of common shares | (1,912) | | | (5,150) | | | (25,709) | |
Debt issue costs | (6,707 | ) | | (240 | ) | | (5,818 | ) | Debt issue costs | (8,705) | | | (203) | | | (248) | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 11,225 |
| | 182 |
| | 1,035 |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 9,906 | | | 19,644 | | | 538 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 179,603 |
| | 18,788 |
| | 114,460 |
| |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 120,263 | | | (53,483) | | | 6,375 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | 117,262 |
| | 21,340 |
| | (9,385 | ) | Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | 254,727 | | | (15,446) | | | (130,174) | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance at beginning of period | 34,441 |
| | 13,101 |
| | 22,486 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance at beginning of period | 6,083 | | | 21,529 | | | 151,703 | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance at end of period | $ | 151,703 |
| | $ | 34,441 |
| | $ | 13,101 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance at end of period | $ | 260,810 | | | $ | 6,083 | | | $ | 21,529 | |
| | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | |
Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | | Cash paid during the year for: | |
Interest — net of amount capitalized | $ | 10,168 |
| | $ | 6,597 |
| | $ | 15,173 |
| Interest — net of amount capitalized | $ | 7,811 | | | $ | 18,962 | | | $ | 17,793 | |
Income taxes | $ | 36,802 |
| | $ | 2,271 |
| | $ | 2,308 |
| Income taxes | $ | 63,666 | | | $ | 36,993 | | | $ | 25,279 | |
| | | | | | |
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS DURING THE PERIOD: | | | | | | NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS DURING THE PERIOD: | |
Community development district infrastructure | $ | 12,573 |
| | $ | (542 | ) | | $ | (1,553 | ) | Community development district infrastructure | $ | (5,335) | | | $ | 1,139 | | | $ | (657) | |
Consolidated inventory not owned | $ | 14,017 |
| | $ | 1,521 |
| | $ | 5,399 |
| Consolidated inventory not owned | $ | 1,980 | | | $ | (11,374) | | | $ | (2,237) | |
Distribution of single-family lots from joint venture arrangements | $ | 16,600 |
| | $ | 28,130 |
| | $ | 8,236 |
| Distribution of single-family lots from joint venture arrangements | $ | 29,740 | | | $ | 27,672 | | | $ | 16,158 | |
Common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes | $ | 57,500 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 20,309 | |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business. M/I Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “we”) is engaged primarily in the construction and sale of single-family residential homes in Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; Indianapolis, Indiana; Chicago, Illinois; Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota; Detroit, Michigan; Tampa, Orlando and Sarasota, Florida; Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio, Texas; and Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina; and the Virginia and Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C.Carolina. The Company designs, sells and builds single-family homes on developed lots, which it develops or purchases ready for home construction. The Company also purchases undeveloped land to develop into developed lots for future construction of single-family homes and, on a limited basis, for sale to others. Our homebuilding operations operate across threetwo geographic regions in the United States. Within these regions, our operations have similar economic characteristics; therefore, they have been aggregated into threetwo reportable homebuilding segments: Midwest homebuilding, Southern homebuilding and Mid-AtlanticNorthern homebuilding.
The Company conducts mortgage financing activities through its 100%-owned subsidiary, M/I Financial, LLC (“M/I Financial”), which originates mortgage loans primarily for purchasers of the Company’s homes. The loans and the servicing rights are generally sold to outside mortgage lenders. The Company and M/I Financial also operate 100% and majority-owned-owned subsidiaries that provide title services to purchasers of the Company’s homes. Our mortgage banking and title service activities have similar economic characteristics; therefore, they have been aggregated into one reportable segment, the financial services segment.
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of M/I Homes, Inc. and those of our consolidated subsidiaries, partnerships and other entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, and of variable interest entities in which we are deemed the primary beneficiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosuredisclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.these estimates and have a significant impact on the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash.Cash and cash equivalents are liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. Amounts in transit from title companies for homes delivered are included in this balance at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Restricted cash consists of amounts held in restricted accounts as collateral for letters of credit as well as cash held in escrow. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash includes restricted cash balances of $1.0$0.1 million and $1.1$0.2 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans held for sale consists primarily of single-family residential loans collateralized by the underlying property. Generally, all of the mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold to third-party investors shortly after origination. Refer to the Revenue Recognition policy described below for additional discussion.
Inventory. Inventory includes the costs of land acquisition, land development and home construction, capitalized interest, real estate taxes, direct overhead costs incurred during development and home construction, and common costs that benefit the entire community, less impairments, if any. Land acquisition, land development and common costs (both incurred and estimated to be incurred) are typically allocated to individual lots based on the total number of lots expected to be closed in each community or phase, or based on the relative fair value, the relative sales value or the front footage method of each lot. Any changes to the estimated total development costs of a community or phase are allocated proportionately to homes remaining in the community or phase and homes previously closed. The cost of individual lots is transferred to homes under construction when home construction begins. Home construction costs are accumulated on a specific identification basis. Costs of home deliveries include the specific construction cost of the home and the allocated lot costs. Such costs are charged to cost of sales simultaneously with revenue recognition, as discussed above. When a home is closed, we typically have not yet paid all incurred costs necessary to complete the home. As homes close, we compare the home construction budget to actual recorded costs to date to estimate the additional costs to be incurred from our subcontractors related to the home. We record a liability and a corresponding charge to cost of sales for the amount we estimate will ultimately be paid related to that home. We monitor the accuracy of such estimates by comparing actual costs incurred in subsequent months to the estimate, although actual costs to complete a home in the future could differ from our estimates.
Inventory is recorded at cost, unless events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the landinventory is impaired, at which point the inventory is written down to fair value as required by the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10,
Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”). The Company assesses
inventory for recoverability on a quarterly basis to determine if events or changes in local or national economic conditions indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In conducting our quarterly review for indicators of impairment on a community level, we evaluate, among other things, the margins on sales contracts in backlog, the margins on homes that have been delivered, expected changes in margins with regard to future home sales over the life of the community, expected changes in margins with regard to future land sales, the value of the land itself as well as any results from third party appraisals. We pay particular attention to communities in which inventory is moving at a slower than anticipated absorption pace, and communities whose average sales price and/or margins are trending downward and are anticipated to continue to trend downward. We also evaluate communities where management intends to lower the sales price or offer incentives in order to improve absorptions even if the community’s historical results do not indicate a potential for impairment. From the review of all of these factors, we identify communities whose carrying values may exceed their estimated undiscounted future cash flows and run a test for recoverability. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the estimated undiscounted future cash flows and which are deemed to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the communities exceeds the estimated fair value. Due to the fact that the Company’s cash flow models and estimates of fair values are based upon management estimates and assumptions, unexpected changes in market conditions and/or changes in management’s intentions with respect to the inventory may lead the Company to incur additional impairment charges in the future.
Our determination of fair value is based on projections and estimates, which are Level 3 measurement inputs. Because each inventory asset is unique, there are numerous inputs and assumptions used in our valuation techniques, including estimated average selling price, construction and development costs, absorption pace (reflecting any product mix change strategies implemented or to be implemented), selling strategies, alternative land uses (including disposition of all or a portion of the land owned), or discount rates, which could materially impact future cash flow and fair value estimates.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, our projections generally assume a gradual improvement in market conditions over time. If communities are not recoverable based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. The fair value of a community is estimated by discounting management’s cash flow projections using an appropriate risk-adjusted interest rate. As of both December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016,2019, we utilized discount rates ranging from 13% to 16% in our valuations. The discount rate used in determining each asset’s estimated fair value reflects the inherent risks associated with the related estimated cash flow stream, as well as current risk-free rates available in the market and estimated market risk premiums. For example, construction in progress inventory, which is closer to completion, will generally require a lower discount rate than land under development in communities consisting of multiple phases spanning several years of development.
Our quarterly assessments reflect management’s best estimates. Due to the inherent uncertainties in management’s estimates and uncertainties related to our operations and our industry as a whole, we are unable to determine at this time if and to what extent continuing future impairments will occur. Additionally, due to the volume of possible outcomes that can be generated from changes in the various model inputs for each community, we do not believe it is possible to create a sensitivity analysis that can provide meaningful information for the users of our consolidated financial statements. Further details relating to our assessment of inventory for recoverability are included in Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Capitalized Interest. The Company capitalizes interest during land development and home construction. Capitalized interest is charged to cost of sales as the related inventory is delivered to a third party. The summary of capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Capitalized interest, beginning of period | $ | 16,012 |
| | $ | 16,740 |
| | $ | 15,296 |
|
Interest capitalized to inventory | 21,484 |
| | 17,685 |
| | 18,410 |
|
Capitalized interest charged to cost of sales | (20,327 | ) | | (18,413 | ) | | (16,966 | ) |
Capitalized interest, end of year | $ | 17,169 |
| | $ | 16,012 |
| | $ | 16,740 |
|
| | | | | |
Interest incurred | $ | 40,358 |
| | $ | 35,283 |
| | $ | 35,931 |
|
Investment in Joint Venture Arrangements. In order to minimize our investment and risk of land exposure in a single location, we have periodically partnered with other land developers or homebuilders to share in the land investment and development of a property through joint ownership and development agreements, joint ventures, and other similar arrangements. During 2017, we decreased our total investment in such joint venture arrangements by $7.5 million from $28.0 million at December 31, 2016 to $20.5 million at December 31, 2017, which was driven primarily by our increased lot distributions from joint venture arrangements during 2017 of $16.6 million, offset, in part, by our cash contributions to our joint venture arrangements during 2017 of $12.1 million.
We believe that the Company’s maximum exposure related to its investment in these joint venture arrangements as of December 31, 2017 is the amount invested of $20.5 million, which is reported as Investment in Joint Venture Arrangements on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, although we expect to invest further amounts in these joint venture arrangements as development of the properties progresses. Further details relating to our joint venture arrangements are included in Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.We use the equity method of accounting for investments in joint venture arrangements over which we exercise significant influence but do not have a controlling interest. Under the equity method, our share of the joint venture arrangements’ earnings or loss, if any, is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company assesses its investments in joint venture arrangements for recoverability on a quarterly basis in accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (“ASC 323”)as described below.
If the fair value of the investment is less than the investment’s carrying value, and the Company has determined that the decline in value is other than temporary, the Company would write down the value of the investment to its estimated fair value. The determination of whether an investment’s fair value is less than the carrying value requires management to make certain assumptions regarding the amount and timing of future contributions to the joint venture arrangements, the timing of distribution of lots to the Company from the joint venture arrangements, the projected fair value of the lots at the time of distribution to the Company, and the estimated proceeds from, and timing of, the sale of land or lots to third parties. In determining the fair value of investments in joint venture arrangements, the Company evaluates the projected cash flows associated with each joint venture arrangement.
As of both December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a discount rate of 16% in determining the fair value of investments in joint venture arrangements. In addition to the assumptions management must make to determine if the investment’s fair value is less than the carrying value, management must also use judgment in determining whether the impairment is other than temporary. The factors management considers are: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost; (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the joint venture arrangement; and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the joint venture arrangements for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and the significant volatility in demand for new housing, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
For joint venture arrangements where a special purpose entity is established to own the property, we generally enter into limited liability company or similar arrangements (“LLCs”) with the other partners. The Company’s ownership in these LLCs as of December 31, 2017 ranged from 25% to 97% and as of December 31, 2016 ranged from 25% to 74%. These entities typically engage in land development activities for the purpose of distributing or selling developed lots to the Company and its partners in the LLC.
Variable Interest Entities. With respect to our investments in LLCs, we are required, under ASC 810-10, Consolidation (“ASC 810”), to evaluate whether or not such entities should be consolidated into our consolidated financial statements. We initially perform these evaluations when each new entity is created and upon any events that require reconsideration of the entity. In order to determine if we should consolidate an LLC, we determine (1) if the LLC is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and (2) if we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. To determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of an entity, we consider whether we have the ability to control the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance. This analysis considers, among other things, whether we have: the ability to determine the budget and scope of land development work, if any; the ability to control financing decisions for the VIE; the ability to acquire additional land into the VIE or dispose of land in the VIE not under contract with M/I Homes; and the ability to change or amend the existing option contract with the VIE. If we determine that we are not able to control such activities, we are not considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we have determined that no LLC in which we have an interest met the requirements of a VIE.
Land Option Agreements. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land option or purchase agreements for which we generally pay non-refundable deposits. Pursuant to these land option agreements, the Company provides a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. In accordance with ASC 810, we analyze our land option or purchase agreements to determine whether the corresponding land sellers are VIEs and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary, using an analysis similar to that described above. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, ASC 810 requires a company to consolidate a VIE if the company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. In cases where we are the primary beneficiary, even though we do not have title to such land, we are required to consolidate these purchase/option agreements and reflect such assets and liabilities as Consolidated Inventory not Owned in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, we have concluded that we were not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs from which we are purchasing land under option or purchase agreements. Other than as described below in “Consolidated Inventory Not Owned,” the Company currently believes that its maximum exposure as of December 31, 2017 related to our land option agreements is equal to the amount of the Company’s outstanding deposits and prepaid acquisition costs, which
totaled $50.4 million, including cash deposits of $32.6 million, prepaid acquisition costs of $5.6 million, letters of credit of $7.2 million and $5.0 million of other non-cash deposits.
Consolidated Inventory Not Owned and Related Obligation. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Consolidated Inventory Not Owned was $21.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the corresponding liability of $21.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively, has been classified as Obligation for Consolidated Inventory Not Owned on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The increase in this balance from December 31, 2016 is related primarily to an increase in the number of land purchase agreements that had deposits and prepaid acquisition and development costs that exceeded certain thresholds resulting in the remaining purchase price of the lots to be recorded in inventory not owned.
Property and Equipment-net. The Company records property and equipment at cost and subsequently depreciates the assets using both straight-line and accelerated methods. Following are the major classes of depreciable assets and their estimated useful lives:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
Land, building and improvements | $ | 11,823 |
| | $ | 11,823 |
|
Office furnishings, leasehold improvements, computer equipment and computer software | 30,409 |
| | 25,895 |
|
Transportation and construction equipment | 10,067 |
| | 10,075 |
|
Property and equipment | 52,299 |
| | 47,793 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | (25,483 | ) | | (25,494 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 26,816 |
| | $ | 22,299 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | |
Office furnishings, leasehold improvements, computer equipment and computer software | $ | 37,567 | | | $ | 28,207 | |
Transportation and construction equipment | 10,045 | | | 10,061 | |
| | | |
Property and equipment | 47,612 | | | 38,268 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (21,000) | | | (16,150) | |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 26,612 | | | $ | 22,118 | |
| | | | | |
| Estimated Useful Lives |
| |
| Estimated Useful Lives |
Building and improvements | 35 years |
Office furnishings, leasehold improvements, computer equipment and computer software | 3-7 years |
Transportation and construction equipment | 5-25 years |
Depreciation expense was $4.1$6.8 million, $3.6$5.9 million and $2.3$5.6 million in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. As a result of the Company’s acquisition of the homebuilding assets and operations of Pinnacle Homes in Detroit, Michigan on March 1, 2018, the Company recorded goodwill of $16.4 million, which is included as Goodwill in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. This amount was based on the estimated fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the date of the acquisition in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles, Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of 2020, and no impairment was recorded at December 31, 2020. See Note 12 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. Other Assets. Other assets at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Development reimbursement receivable from local municipalities | $ | 22,237 | | | $ | 16,083 | |
Mortgage servicing rights | 9,237 | | | 9,614 | |
Prepaid expenses | 15,918 | | | 13,841 | |
Prepaid acquisition costs | 10,092 | | | 5,688 | |
Other | 37,691 | | | 25,085 | |
Total other assets | $ | 95,175 | | | $ | 70,311 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
Development reimbursement receivable from local municipalities | $ | 14,981 |
| | $ | 15,698 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights | 7,821 |
| | 11,443 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 9,022 |
| | 11,227 |
|
Prepaid acquisition costs | 5,634 |
| | 4,740 |
|
Other | 23,677 |
| | 19,818 |
|
Total other assets | $ | 61,135 |
| | $ | 62,926 |
|
Warranty Reserves. We use subcontractors for nearly all aspects of home construction. Although our subcontractors are generally required to repair and replace any product or labor defects, we are, during applicable warranty periods, ultimately responsible to the homeowner for making such repairs. As such, we record warranty reserves to cover our exposure to the costs for materials and labor not expected to be covered by our subcontractors to the extent they relate to warranty-type claims. Warranty reserves are established by charging cost of sales and crediting a warranty reserve for each home delivered. The amounts charged are estimated by management to be adequate to cover expected warranty-related costs described above under the Company’s warranty programs. Warranty reserves are recorded for warranties under our Home Builder’s Limited Warranty (“HBLW”), and our 30-year (offered on all homes sold after April 25, 1998 and on or before December 1, 2015 in all of our markets except our Texas markets), 15-year (offered on all homes sold after December 1, 2015 in all of our markets except our Texas markets) and 10-year (offered on all homes sold in our Texas markets) transferable structural warranty.warranty (see additional information in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The warranty reserves for the HBLW are established as a percentage of average sales price and adjusted based on historical payment patterns determined, generally, by geographic area and recent trends. Factors that are given consideration in determining the HBLW reserves include: (1) the historical range of amounts paid per average sales price on a home; (2) type and mix of amenity packages added to the home; (3) any warranty expenditures not considered to be normal and recurring; (4) timing of payments; (5) improvements in quality of construction expected to impact future warranty expenditures; and (6) conditions that may affect certain projects and require a different percentage of average sales price for those specific projects. Changes in estimates for warranties occur due to changes in the historical payment experience and differences between the actual payment pattern experienced during the period and the historical payment pattern used in our evaluation of the warranty reserve balance at the end of each quarter. Actual future warranty costs could differ from our current estimated amount.
Our warranty reserves for our transferable structural warranty programs are established on a per-unit basis. While the structural warranty reserve is recorded as each homehouse is delivered, the sufficiency of the structural warranty per unit charge and total reserve is re-evaluated on an annual basis, with the assistance of an actuary, using our own historical data and trends, industry-wide historical data and trends, and other project specific factors. The reserves are also evaluated quarterly and adjusted if we encounter activity that is inconsistent with the historical experience used in the annual analysis. These reserves are subject to variability due to uncertainties regarding structural defect claims for products we build, the markets in which we build, claim settlement history, insurance and legal interpretations, among other factors.
Our warranty reserve amounts are based upon historical experience and geographic location. While we believe that our warranty reserves are sufficient to cover our projected costs, there can be no assurances that historical data and trends will accurately predict our actual warranty costs. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, warranty reserves of $26.1$29.0 million and $27.7$26.4 million, respectively, are included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Please see See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our warranty reserves, including reserves related to stucco-related repairs in certain of our Florida communities. Self-insurance Reserves. Self-insurance reserves are made for estimated liabilities associated with employee health care, workers’ compensation, and general liability insurance. For 2017, our self-insurance limit for employee health care was $250,000 per covered person per contract period, with stop loss insurance covering amounts in excess of $250,000. Our workers’ compensation claims are insured by a third party and carry a deductible of $250,000 per claim, except for workers compensation claims made in the State of Ohio where the Company is self-insured. Our self-insurance limit for Ohio workers’ compensation is $500,000 per claim, with stop loss insurance covering all amounts in excess of this limit.party. The reserves related to employee health care and workers’ compensation are based on historical experience and open case reserves. Our general liability claims are insured by a third party, subject to a deductible. Effective for home closings occurring on or after July 1, 2017, the Company renewed its general liability insurance coverage which, among other things, changed the structure of our completed operations/construction defect deductible to $10.0 million for the entire company (for closings prior to July 1, 2017, our completed operations/construction defect deductible was $7.5 million for each of our regions) and decreased our third party bodily injury and property damage claims deductible to $250,000 (a decrease from $500,000 for closings prior to July 1, 2017)self-insured retention (“SIR”). The Company records a reserve for general liability claims falling below the Company’s deductible.SIR. The reserve estimate is based on an actuarial evaluation of our past history of general liability claims, other industry specific factors and specific event analysis. At December 31, 2017 2020
and 2016,2019, self-insurance reserves of $2.4$2.8 million and $1.8$2.7 million, respectively, are included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recorded expenses totaling $8.9$10.1 million, $6.5$9.5 million and $6.1$9.2 million for all self-insured and general liability claims during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Guarantees and Indemnities. Guarantee and indemnity liabilities are established by charging the applicable income statement or balance sheet line, depending on the nature of the guarantee or indemnity, and crediting a liability. M/I Financial provides a limited-life guarantee on loans sold to certain third parties and estimates its actual liability related to the guarantee and any indemnities subsequently provided to the purchaser of the loans in lieu of loan repurchase based on historical loss experience. Actual future costs associated with loans guaranteed or indemnified could differ materially from our current estimated amounts. The Company has also provided certain other guarantees and indemnities in connection with the purchase and development of land, including environmental indemnities, and guarantees of the completion of land development. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the estimated cost of insurance coverage or estimated cost of acquiring a bond in the amount of the exposure. Actual future costs associated with these guarantees and indemnities could differ materially from our current estimated amounts. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, guarantees and indemnities of $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, are included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Other Liabilities. Other liabilities at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Accruals related to land development | $ | 64,580 | | | $ | 48,694 | |
Warranty | 29,012 | | | 26,420 | |
Payroll and other benefits | 44,330 | | | 35,125 | |
Other | 45,661 | | | 37,698 | |
Total other liabilities | $ | 183,583 | | | $ | 147,937 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
Accruals related to land development | $ | 37,180 |
| | $ | 35,417 |
|
Warranty | 26,133 |
| | 27,732 |
|
Payroll and other benefits | 28,128 |
| | 26,140 |
|
Other | 40,093 |
| | 33,873 |
|
Total other liabilities | $ | 131,534 |
| | $ | 123,162 |
|
Segment Reporting. The application of segment reporting requires significant judgment in determining our operating segments. Operating segments are defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the Company’s chief operating decision makers to evaluate performance, make operating decisions and determine how to allocate resources. The Company’s chief operating decision makers evaluate the Company’s performance in various ways,
including: (1) the results of our 15 individual homebuilding operating segmentsRevenue Recognition. Revenue and the results of our financial services operations; (2) the results of our three homebuilding regions; and (3) our consolidated financial results.
In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), we have identified each homebuilding division as an operating segment as each homebuilding division engages in business activities from which it earns revenue, primarily from the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached homes, acquisition and development of land, and the occasional sale of lots to third parties. Our financial services operations generate revenue primarily from the origination, sale and servicing of mortgage loans and title services primarily for purchasers of the Company’s homes and are included in our financial services reportable segment. Corporate is a non-operating segment that develops and implements strategic initiatives and supports our operating segments by centralizing key administrative functions such as accounting, finance, treasury, information technology, insurance and risk management, litigation, marketing and human resources.
In accordance with the aggregation criteria defined in ASC 280, we have determined our reportable segments as follows: Midwest homebuilding, Southern homebuilding, Mid-Atlantic homebuilding and financial services operations. The homebuilding operating segments included in each reportable segment have been aggregated because they share similar aggregation characteristics as prescribed in ASC 280 in the following regards: (1) long-term economic characteristics; (2) historical and expected future long-term gross margin percentages; (3) housing products, production processes and methods of distribution; and (4) geographical proximity. We may, however, be required to reclassify our reportable segments if markets that currently are being aggregated do not continue to share these aggregation characteristics.
Revenue Recognition. Revenuerelated profit from the sale of a home isand revenue and the related profit from the sale of land to third parties are recognized whenin the financial statements on the date of closing if delivery has occurred, title has passed to the risksbuyer, all performance obligations (as defined below) have been met, and rewardscontrol of ownership arethe home or land is transferred to the buyer in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for the home or land. If not received immediately upon closing, cash proceeds from home closings are held in escrow for the Company’s benefit, typically for up to three days, and are included in Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Sales incentives vary by type of incentive and by amount on a community-by-community and home-by-home basis. The costs of any sales incentives in the form of free or discounted products and services provided to homebuyers are reflected in Land and housing costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income because such incentives are identified in our home purchase contracts with homebuyers as an adequate initialintrinsic part of our single performance obligation to deliver and continuing investment bytransfer title to their home for the homebuyertransaction price stated in the contracts. Sales incentives that we may provide in the form of closing cost allowances are recorded as a reduction of housing revenue at the time the home is received, ordelivered.
We record sales commissions within Selling expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income when incurred (i.e., when the loan has beenhome is delivered) as the amortization period is generally one year or less and therefore capitalization is not required as part of the practical expedient for incremental costs of obtaining a contract.
Contract liabilities include customer deposits related to sold but undelivered homes. Substantially all of our home sales are scheduled to a third-party investor. Revenue for homes that close and be recorded to the buyer having a down payment of 5% or greater, home deliveries financed by third parties, and all home deliveries insured under Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), U.S. Veterans Administration (“VA”) and other government-insured programs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements onrevenue within one year from the date of closing.receiving a customer deposit. Contract liabilities expected to be recognized as revenue, excluding revenue pertaining to contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less, is not material.
Revenue
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. All of our home purchase contracts have a single performance obligation as the promise to transfer the home is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contract and, therefore, not distinct. Our performance obligation, to deliver the agreed-upon home, is generally satisfied in less than one year from the original contract date. Deferred revenue resulting from uncompleted performance obligations existing at the time we deliver new homes to our homebuyers is not material.
Although our third party land sale contracts may include multiple performance obligations, the revenue we expect to recognize in any future year related to all other home deliveries initially funded by M/I Financial, our 100%-owned subsidiary, is recorded on the dateremaining performance obligations, excluding revenue pertaining to contracts that M/I Financial sells the loan to a third-party investor, because the receivable from the third-party investorhave an original expected duration of one year or less, is not subject to future subordination, andmaterial. We do not disclose the Company has transferred to this investor the usual risks and rewardsvalue of ownership that is in substance aunsatisfied performance obligations for land sale and does not have a substantial continuing involvementcontracts with the home.an original expected duration of one year or less.
We recognize the majority of the revenue associated with our mortgage loan operations when the mortgage loans are sold and/or related servicing rights are sold to third party investors or set up with the subservicer.retained and managed under a third party sub-service arrangement. The revenue recognized is reduced by the fair value of the related guarantee provided to the investor. The fair value of the guarantee is recognized in revenue when the Company is released from its obligation under the guarantee. Generally, allguarantee (note that guarantees are excluded from the scope of the financial services mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold to third party investors within two to three weeks of origination; however, M/I Financial began retaining a portion of mortgage loan servicing rights during 2012.ASC 606). As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we retained mortgage servicing rights of 3,0945,489 and 4,4453,613 loans, respectively, for a total value of $7.8$9.2 million and $11.4$9.6 million, respectively. We recognize financial services revenue associated with our title operations as homes are closed,delivered, closing services are rendered, and title policies are issued, all of which generally occur simultaneously as each home is closed.delivered. All of the underwriting risk associated with title insurance policies is transferred to third-party insurers.
The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue source:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | |
Housing | $ | 2,939,962 | | | $ | 2,420,348 | | | $ | 2,217,197 | |
Land sales | 19,170 | | | 24,619 | | | 16,889 | |
Financial services (a) | 87,013 | | | 55,323 | | | 52,196 | |
Total revenue | $ | 3,046,145 | | | $ | 2,500,290 | | | $ | 2,286,282 | |
(a)Revenues include hedging losses of $19.0 million and $12.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and hedging gains of $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Hedging gains (losses) do not represent revenues recognized from contracts with customers.
Refer to Note 15 for presentation of our revenues disaggregated by geography. As our homebuilding operations accounted for over 97% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, with most of those revenues generated from home purchase contracts with customers, we believe the disaggregation of revenues as disclosed above and in Note 15 fairly depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows are affected by economic factors.
Land and Housing Cost of Sales. All associated homebuilding costs are charged to cost of sales in the period when the revenues from home deliveries are recognized. Homebuilding costs include: land and land development costs; home construction costs (including an estimate of the costs to complete construction); previously capitalized interest; real estate taxes; indirect costs; and estimated warranty costs. All other costs are expensed as incurred. Sales incentives, including pricing discounts and financing costs paid by the Company, are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Sales incentives in the form of options or upgrades are recorded in homebuilding costs.
Income Taxes. The Company records income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on future tax consequences attributable to (1) temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and (2) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the change is enacted. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was enacted which, among other things, reduces the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 and recognized a
non-cash provisional tax expense of approximately $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Please see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.In accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets, including the benefit from net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credit carryforwards, if any, to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that all or any portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required. This assessment gives appropriate consideration to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets and considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the length of statutory carryforward periods, our experience with operating losses and our experience of utilizing tax credit carryforwards and tax planning alternatives. Please see See Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our deferred tax assets. Earnings Per Share. The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, (“ASC 260”). Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to the potential dilution that could occur if securities or contracts to issue our common shares that are dilutive were exercised or converted into common shares or resulted in the issuance of common shares that then shared our earnings. In periods of net losses, no dilution is computed. Please see See Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our earnings per share calculation. Stock-Based Compensation. We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grant of equity-based awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which generally requires that companies measure and recognize stock-based compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based awards granted under compensation arrangements over the related vesting period. We have granted share-based awards to certain of our employees and directors in the form of stock options, director stock units and performance share units (“PSU’s”). Each PSU represents a contingent right to receive one common share of the Company if vesting is satisfied at the end of the performance period based on the related performance conditions and markets conditions.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards requires judgment to identify the appropriate valuation model and develop the assumptions. The grant date fair value for stock option awards and PSU’s with a market condition (as defined in ASC 718) is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulation methodology, respectively. The grant date fair value for the director stock units and PSU’s with a performance condition (as defined in ASC 718) is based upon the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant. We recognize stock-based compensation expense for our stock option awards and PSU’s with a market condition over the requisite service period of the award while stock-based compensation expense for our director stock units, which vest immediately, is fully recognized in the period of the award. For the portion of the PSU’s awarded subject to the satisfaction of a performance condition, we recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period based on the probable outcome of the related performance condition. If satisfaction of the performance condition is not probable, stock-based compensation expense recognition is deferred until probability is attained and a cumulative compensation expense adjustment is recorded and recognized ratably over the remaining service period. The Company reevaluates the probability of the satisfaction of the performance condition on a quarterly basis, and stock-based compensation expense is adjusted based on the portion of the requisite service period that has passed. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be higher and have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Please see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our stock-based compensation.Letters of Credit and Completion Bonds. The Company provides standby letters of credit and completion bonds for development work in progress, deposits on land and lot purchase agreements and miscellaneous deposits. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding $179.6 million of completion bonds and standby letters of credit, some of which were issued to various local governmental entities, that expire at various times through September 2024. Included in this total are: (1) $122.3 million of performance and maintenance bonds and $41.6 million of performance letters of credit that serve as completion bonds for land development work in progress; (2) $8.1 million of financial letters of credit; and (3) $7.6 million of financial bonds. The development agreements under which we are required to provide completion bonds or letters of credit are generally not subject to a required completion date and only require that the improvements are in place in phases as houses are built and sold. In locations where development has progressed, the amount of development work remaining to be completed is typically less than the remaining amount of bonds or letters of credit due to timing delays in obtaining release of the bonds or letters of credit.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards.Standards and SEC Guidance. In MarchJune 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU
2016-09”2016-13”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects2016-13 replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequencesa broader range of reasonable and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public entities,supportable information to estimate credit losses. ASU 2016-092016-13 is effective for our fiscal yearsyear beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the new standard in the first quarter of 2017. Excess tax benefits or deficiencies for stock-based compensation are now reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a component of income tax expense, whereas previously they were recognized in equity. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Impact of New Accounting Standards.In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, “Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts.” ASU 2014-09’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under today’s guidance, including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which delayed the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09, as amended, is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
January 1, 2020. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU 2014-09,2016-13, the FASB has issued several ASUs, such as ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)No. 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (“ASU 2018-19”) in November 2018, ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments (“ASU 2019-04”), ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,in April 2019, and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.No. 2019-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) Targeted Transition Relief (“ASU 2019-05”) in May 2019. These ASUs do not change the core principle of the guidance stated in ASU 2014-09.2016-13. Instead these amendments are intended to clarify and improve the operability of certain topics addressed by ASU 2014-09, as amended. See below for additional explanation of each of these additional ASUs. The Company does not believeincluded within the adoption of these additional
credit losses standard. These ASUs will have a material impactthe same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2016-13. Our adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.
Due to the nature of our operations, we expect to identify similar performance obligations in our contracts under ASU 2014-09 compared with the deliverables and separate units of account we have identified under existing accounting standards, and therefore, we anticipate this standard willJanuary 1, 2020 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. As a result, we expect the amountstatements and timing of our housing revenue to remain substantially unchanged. Due to the complexity of certain of our land contracts, however, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the standard for land sales will depend on contract-specific terms. We do not expect significant changes to the amount and timing of our financial services revenue, or significant changes to our business processes, systems, or internal controls as a result of adopting the standard.disclosures.
We adopted the standard on January 1,
In August 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method, which includes a cumulative catch-up in retained earnings on the initial date of adoption for existing contracts (those that are not completed) as of, and new contracts after, January 1, 2018.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2016-02”2018-13”). ASU 2016-02 will require organizations that lease assets - referred2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and removes the requirement to as “lessees” - to recognize ondisclose (1) the balance sheetamount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the assetsfair value hierarchy, (2) the policy for timing of transfers between levels, and liabilities(3) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 requires disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the rightsperiod included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and obligations created by those leases. Under ASU 2016-02, a lessee will be requiredthe range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Lessor accounting remains substantially similar to current GAAP. In addition, disclosures of leasing activities will be expanded to include qualitative and specific quantitative information.develop Level 3 fair value measurements. For publicall entities, ASU 2016-022018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Our adoption of ASU 2016-02 mandates2018-13 on January 1, 2020 did not have a modified retrospectivematerial impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). ASU 2020-04 is intended to provide temporary optional expedients and exceptions to the US GAAP guidance on contract modifications and hedge accounting to ease the financial reporting burdens related to the expected market transition method.from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. This guidance was effective beginning March 12, 2020 and can be applied prospectively through December 31, 2022. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In March 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10762, Financial Disclosures About Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities and Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize a Registrant’s Securities (“SEC Release No. 33-10762”), which amends the financial disclosure requirements applicable to registered debt offerings that include credit enhancements, such as subsidiary guarantees, in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. The amended rule focuses on providing material, relevant and decision-useful information regarding guarantees and other credit enhancements, while eliminating certain prescriptive requirements. In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-09, Debt (Topic 470) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-10762 (“ASU 2020-09”), to reflect the SEC’s new disclosure rules on guaranteed debt securities offerings adopted by the Company. The new SEC and FASB guidance is effective January 4, 2021 with earlier adoption permitted. The Company continuesearly adopted these amendments on December 31, 2020. Accordingly, summarized financial information has been presented only for the issuers and guarantors of the Company's registered securities for the most recent fiscal year and as permitted, this information is included in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
In May 2020, the SEC issued Final Rule Release No.33-10786, Amendments to evaluateFinancial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses (“SEC Release No. 33-10786”). The rule was effective on January 1, 2021. Our adoption of this rule did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2020, the potentialSEC issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10825, Modernization of Regulation S-K Items 101, 103, and 105 (“SEC Release No. 33-10825”). The rule was effective on November 9, 2020. Our adoption of this rule did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The updated disclosures required by this rule are included in “Item 1. Business”, “Item 2. Risk Factors” and “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”
In November 2020, the SEC issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10890, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data, and Supplementary Financial Information (“SEC Release No. 33-10890”). The rule was effective on February 10, 2021. We elected to early adopt Items 301 and 302 of this rule which eliminated the disclosure of certain selected financial data and supplementary financial data, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures. We did not adopt the amendments related to Item 303. The Company is required to adopt those amendments in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Impact of New Accounting Standards.In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes ("ASU 2019-12"), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. ASU 2019-12 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-022019-12 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures; however. because a large majority of our leases are for office space, whichdisclosures, but we have determined will be treated as operating leases under ASU 2016-02, we anticipate recording a right-of-use asset and related lease liability for these leases, but do not expect that adoption will have a material impact on our expense recognition pattern to change.Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
In March 2016,2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)2020-03, Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-08”2020-03”). TheASU 2020-03 improves and clarifies various financial instruments topics, including the current expected credit losses (CECL) standard issued in 2016 (described above). ASU 2020-03 includes seven different issues that describe the areas of improvement and the related amendments in this ASUto GAAP that are intended to improvemake the operabilitystandards easier to understand and understandabilityapply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications. The amendments have different effective dates. We are currently evaluating the effect of the implementationadopting this new accounting guidance, stated in ASU 2014-09but we do not expect that adoption will have a material impact on principal versus agent considerationsour Consolidated Financial Statements and whether an entity reports revenue on a gross or net basis.disclosures.
In April 2016,August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts2020-06, Debt-Debt with Customers: Identifying Performance ObligationsConversion and LicensingOther Options (“ASU 2016-10”2020-06”)., to address the complexity associated with applying GAAP to certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. The ASU 2016-10 providesincludes amendments to the guidance on identifying performance obligationsconvertible instruments and licensing. This
update clarifies the guidancederivative scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity and simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments which include beneficial conversion features or cash conversion features by removing certain separation models in Subtopic 470-20. Additionally, the ASU 2014-09 relatingwill require entities to identifying performance obligations and licensing. The new standard will be effectiveuse the “if-converted” method when calculating diluted earnings per share for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
In May 2016, the FASB issuedconvertible instruments. ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”). ASU 2016-12 provides for amendments to ASU 2014-09 regarding transition, collectability, noncash consideration, and presentation of sales tax and other similar taxes. Specifically, ASU 2016-12 clarifies that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all or substantially all of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. In addition, ASU 2016-12 clarifies how an entity should evaluate the collectability threshold and when an entity can recognize nonrefundable consideration received as revenue if an arrangement does not meet the standard’s contract criteria.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. For public entities, ASU 2016-152020-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”), which provides a more robust framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or dispositions) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company isWe are currently evaluating the potential impact theeffect of adopting this new accounting guidance, but we do not expect that adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test in order to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not believe the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”), which provides clarification on when modification accounting should be used for changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. This ASU does not change the accounting for modifications but clarifies that modification accounting guidance should only be applied if there is a change to the value, vesting conditions, or award classification and would not be required if the changes are considered non-substantive. For all entities, ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
NOTE 2. Stock-Based and Deferred Compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grant of equity-based awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which generally requires that companies measure and recognize stock-based compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based awards granted under compensation arrangements over the related vesting period. We have granted share-based awards to certain of our employees and directors in the form of stock options, director stock units and performance share units (“PSU’s”). Determining the fair value of share-based awards requires judgment to identify the appropriate valuation model and develop the assumptions.
Stock Incentive Plans
The Company has an equity compensation plan,maintains the M/I Homes, Inc. 20092018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009“2018 LTIP”) which has been amended from time to time. The 2009 LTIP was approved by our shareholders and is, an equity compensation plan administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Under the 20092018 LTIP, the Company is permitted to grant (1) nonqualified stock options to purchase common shares, (2) incentive stock options to purchase common shares, (3) stock appreciation rights, (4) restricted common shares, (5) other stock-based awards – awards(awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, the fair market value of theour common shares,shares), and (6) cash-based awards to its officers, employees, non-employee directors and other eligible participants. Subject to certain adjustments, the plan2018 LTIP authorizes awards to officers, employees, non-employee directors and other eligible participants for up to 3,900,0002,250,000 common shares, of which 1,504,4871,150,810 remain available for grant at December 31, 2017.2020.
The 20092018 LTIP replaced the M/I Homes, Inc. 1993 Stock2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan as Amended (the “1993 Plan”“2009 LTIP”), which expired by its terms on April 22, 2009.was terminated immediately following our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Awards outstanding under the 1993 Plan2009 LTIP remain in effect in accordance with their respective terms.
Stock Options
Stock options are granted at the market price of the Company’s common shares at the close of business on the date of grant. The grant date fair value for stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Options awarded generally vest 20% annually over five years and expire after ten years. We recognize stock-based compensation expense for our stock option awards over the requisite service period of the award. Under the 2018 LTIP and the 2009 LTIP, in the case of termination due to death, disability or retirement, all options will become immediately exercisable. Shares issued upon option exercise may
consist of treasury shares, authorized but unissued common shares or common shares purchased by or on behalf of the Company in the open market.
Following is a summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, relating to the stock options awarded under the 20092018 LTIP and the 1993 Plan:2009 LTIP:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(a) (In thousands) |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 1,623,720 | | | $ | 25.30 | | | 7.22 | | $ | 22,836 | |
Granted | 424,500 | | | 42.23 | | | | | |
Exercised | (422,820) | | | 23.43 | | | | | |
Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2020 | 1,625,400 | | | $ | 30.21 | | | 7.28 | | $ | 22,882 | |
Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2020 | 1,580,805 | | | $ | 30.11 | | | 7.26 | | $ | 22,408 | |
Options exercisable at December 31, 2020 | 666,100 | | | $ | 23.91 | | | 5.84 | | $ | 13,577 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(a) (In thousands) |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 2,309,128 |
| | $ | 19.96 |
| | 5.93 | | $ | 13,773 |
|
Granted | 408,000 |
| | 23.34 |
| | | | |
Exercised | (678,781 | ) | | 16.54 |
| | | | |
Forfeited | (215,529 | ) | | 32.74 |
| | | | |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2017 | 1,822,818 |
| | $ | 20.48 |
| | 6.88 | | $ | 25,376 |
|
Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2017 | 1,762,478 |
| | $ | 20.46 |
| | 6.83 | | $ | 24,572 |
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2017 | 1,054,418 |
| | $ | 20.05 |
| | 5.93 | | $ | 15,127 |
|
(a)Intrinsic value is defined as the amount by which the fair value of the underlying common shares exceeds the exercise price of the option.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was $9.3$8.4 million, $0.1$14.5 million and $0.7$0.6 million, respectively.
The fair value of our five-year service-based stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was established at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model, with the weighted average assumptions as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.96 | % | | 1.34 | % | | 1.72 | % | Risk-free interest rate | 1.42 | % | | 2.51 | % | | 2.72% |
Expected volatility | 39.49 | % | | 47.20 | % | | 56.37 | % | Expected volatility | 29.15 | % | | 28.81 | % | | 32.01% |
Expected term (in years) | 5.9 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 5.6 |
| Expected term (in years) | 5.6 | | 5.9 | | 5.7 |
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the period | $ | 9.45 |
| | $ | 7.57 |
| | $ | 11.07 |
| Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the period | $ | 12.65 | | $ | 9.06 | | $ | 11.31 |
The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury constant maturity rate at the date of the grant. Expected volatility is based on an average of (1) historical volatility of the Company’s stock and (2) implied volatility from traded options on the Company’s stock. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award is based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the stock option award is granted, with a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option award granted. The Company uses historical data to estimate stock option exercises and forfeitures within its valuation model. The expected life of stock option awards granted is derived from historical exercise experience under the Company’s share-based payment plans, and represents the period of time that stock option awards granted are expected to be outstanding.
Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock option awards that has been charged against income relating to the 2009 LTIP and the 1993 Plan was $3.7$3.9 million, $3.3$3.6 million and $3.2$3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, respectively.2018, respectively, relating to the 2018 LTIP and the 2009 LTIP. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was a total of $6.9$9.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards that will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 2.02.1 years for the service awards.
Director Stock Units
Under the 2009 LTIP, theThe Company awarded its non-employee directors a total of 18,00024,000 stock units duringunder the year ended December 31, 2017, and 15,000 stock units2018 LTIP during each of the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015.2019, and a total of 21,000 stock units under the 2018 LTIP during the year ended December 31, 2018. Each stock unit is the equivalent of one common share, vests immediately and will be converted into a common share upon termination of service as a director. The grant date fair value for the director stock units is based upon the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense for our director stock units, which vest immediately, is fully recognized in the period of the award. The Company recognized the full stock-based compensation expense related to the awards of $0.5$0.7 million in 2017,each of 2020, 2019 and $0.3 million in both 2016 and 2015 due to the immediate vesting provisions of the award.2018.
On May 5, 2009, the Company’s board of directors terminated the M/I Homes, Inc. 2006 Director Equity Incentive Plan (the “Director Equity Plan”). Awards outstanding under the Director Equity Plan remain in effect in accordance with their respective terms. At December 31, 2017,2020, there were 8,059 stock units outstanding under the Director Equity Plan with a value of $0.2 million.
Performance Share Unit Awards
On February 8, 2017,18, 2020, February 16, 201619, 2019 and February 17, 2015,15, 2018, the Company awarded its executive officers (in the aggregate) a target number of performance share units (“PSU’s”)PSU’s under the 2018 LTIP (in the case of the 2020 and 2019 awards) and the 2009 LTIP (in the case of the 2018 awards) equal to 57,110, 79,10845,771, 53,692 and 56,38946,444 PSU’s, respectively. Each PSU represents a contingent right to receive one common share of the Company if vesting is satisfied at the end of a three-year performance period (the “Performance Period”). based on the related performance conditions and markets conditions. The ultimate number of PSU’s that will vest and be earned, if any, after the completion of the Performance Period, is based on (1) (a) the Company’s cumulative annual pre-tax income from operations, excluding extraordinary items as defined in the underlying award agreements with the executive officers, over the Performance Period (weighted 80%) (the “Performance Condition”), and (b) the Company’s relative total shareholder return over the Performance Period compared to the total shareholder return of a peer group of other publicly-traded homebuilders (weighted 20%) (the “Market Condition”) and (2) the participant’s continued employment through the end of the Performance Period, except in the case of termination due to death, disability or retirement or involuntary termination without cause by the Company. The number of PSU’s that vest may increase by up to 50% from the target number based on levels of achievement of the above criteria as set forth in the applicable award agreements and decrease to zero if the Company fails to meet the minimum performance levels for both of the above criteria. If the Company achieves the minimum performance levels for both of the above criteria, 50% of the target number of PSU’s will vest and be earned. Any portion of PSU’s that does not vest at the end of the Performance Period will be forfeited. Additionally, the PSU’s have no dividend or voting rights during the Performance Period.
The grant date fair value for PSU’s with a market condition (as defined in ASC 718) is estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation methodology, and the grant date fair value for PSU’s with a performance condition (as defined in ASC 718) is based upon the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant. The grant date fair value of the portion of the PSU’s subject to the Performance Condition and the Market Condition component was $23.34$42.23 and $19.69,$37.51, respectively, for the 20172020 PSU’s, $16.85$27.62 and $15.75,$32.52, respectively, for the 20162019 PSU’s, and $21.28$31.93 and $18.92,$33.57, respectively, for the 20152018 PSU’s. In accordance with ASC 718, for the portion of the PSU’s subject to a Market Condition, stock-based compensation expense is derived using the Monte Carlo simulation methodology and is recognized ratably over the service period regardless of whether or not the attainment of the Market Condition is probable. Therefore, the Company recognized $0.3$0.4 million in stock-based compensation expense during 20172020 related to the Market Condition portion of the 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 PSU awards. There was a total of $0.2 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the Market Condition portion of the 20172020 and 20162019 PSU awards as of December 31, 2017.2020. At December 31, 2017,2020, the Market Condition for the 20152018 PSU awards was met, and the companyCompany recorded $0.2$0.3 million of stock-based compensation expense. Based on these results and board approval, 11,50311,703 PSU’s vested during the first quarter of 20182021 with respect to the portion of the 20152018 PSU’s subject to the Market Condition.
For the portion of the PSU’s subject to a Performance Condition, we recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the Performance Period based on the probable outcome of the related Performance Condition. Otherwise,If satisfaction of the performance condition is not probable, stock-based compensation expense recognition is deferred until probability is attained and a cumulative stock-based compensation expense adjustment is recorded and recognized ratably over the remaining service period. The Company reassesses the probability of the satisfaction of the Performance Condition on a quarterly basis, and stock-based compensation expense is adjusted based on the portion of the requisite service period that has passed. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be higher and have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had not recognized any stock-based compensation expense related to the Performance Condition portion of the 20172020 PSU awards. If the Company achieves the minimum performance levels for the Performance Condition to be met for the 20172020 PSU awards, the Company would record unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.5$0.8 million as of December 31, 2017,2020, for which $0.2$0.3 million would be immediately recognized hadas if attainment been probable at December 31, 2017.2020. The Company recognized $0.4$0.8 million of stock-based compensation expense related to the Performance Condition portion of the 20162019 PSU awards during 20172020 based on the probability of attaining the performance condition.Performance Condition. The Company has $0.2$0.4 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense forrelated to the 2016Performance Condition portion of the 2019 PSU awards at December 31, 2017.2020. The Company recognized $1.1$1.4 million of stock-based compensation expense forrelated to the 2015Performance Condition portion of the 2018 PSU awards as of December 31, 2017 which met2020 based on the achievement of the maximum performance level at December 31, 2017.level. Based on these results and board approval, 67,66855,733 PSU’s vested during the first quarter of 20182021 with respect to the portion of the 2015 PSU’s2018 PSU awards subject to the Performance Condition.
Deferred Compensation Plans
The purpose of the Company’s Amended and Restated Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Executive Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, is to provide an opportunity for certain eligible employees of the Company to defer a
portion of their compensation and to invest in the Company’s common shares. The purpose of the Company’s Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”) is to provide its directors with an opportunity to defer their director compensation and to invest in the Company’s common shares.
Compensation expense deferred into the Executive Plan and the Director Plan (together the “Plans”) totaled $0.4$0.2 million $0.1 million and $0.3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018. The portion of cash compensation deferred by employees and directors under the Plans is invested in fully-vested equity units in the Plans. One equity unit is the equivalent of one common share. Equity units and the related dividends (if any) will be converted and generally distributed to the employee or director in the
form of common shares at the earlier of his or her elected distribution date or termination of service as an employee or director of the Company. Distributions from the Plans totaled $0.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and less than $0.1$0.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.2020, and $0.2 million in both the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there were a total of 51,78750,579 equity units with a value of $1.2$1.3 million outstanding under the Plans. The aggregate fair market value of these units at December 31, 2017,2020, based on the closing price of the underlying common shares, was approximately $2.4$2.2 million, and the associated deferred tax benefit the Company would recognize if the outstanding units were distributed was $1.3$1.2 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. Common shares are issued from treasury shares upon distribution of equity units from the Plans.
Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan
The Company has a profit-sharing and retirement plan that covers substantially all Company employees and permits participants to make contributions to the plan on a pre-tax basis in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Company contributions to the plan are also made at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors based on the Company’s profitability and resulted in a $1.8$3.9 million, $1.4$2.9 million and $1.2$2.3 million expense (net of plan expenses) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
NOTE 3. Fair Value Measurements
There are three measurement input levels for determining fair value: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
To meet financing needs of our home-buying customers, M/I Financial is party to interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”), which are extended to customers who have applied for a mortgage loan and meet certain defined credit and underwriting criteria. These IRLCs are considered derivative financial instruments. M/I Financial manages interest rate risk related to its IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale through the use of forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (“FMBSs”), the use of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments, and the occasional purchase of options on FMBSs in accordance with Company policy. These FMBSs, options on FMBSs, and IRLCs covered by FMBSs are considered non-designated derivatives. These amounts are either recorded in Other Assets or Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (depending on the respective balance for that year ended December 31).
The Company measures both mortgage loans held for sale and IRLCs at fair value. Fair value measurement results in a better presentation of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them.
In the normal course of business, our financial services segment enters into contractual commitments to extend credit to buyers of single-family homes with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers “lock-in” a specified interest rate within established time frames. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the “lock-in” of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to an investor. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, the Company enters into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale contracts to sell whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The forward sale contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments. The Company does not engage in speculative trading or trading derivative activities. Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to broker/dealers or investors are undesignated derivatives, and accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings. Changes in fair value measurements are included in earnings in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is estimated based primarily on published prices for mortgage-backed securities with similar characteristics. To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, the Company utilizes applicable published mortgage-backed security prices, and multiplies the price movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount. The Company sells loans on a servicing released or servicing retained basis, and receives servicing compensation. Thus, the value of the servicing rights included in the fair value measurement is based upon contractual terms with investors and depends on the loan type. The Company applies a fallout rate to IRLCs when measuring the fair value of rate lock commitments. Fallout is defined as locked loan commitments for which the Company does not close a mortgage loan and is based on management’s judgment and company experience.
The Company sells loans on a servicing released or servicing retained basis, and receives servicing compensation. Thus, the value of the servicing rights included in the fair value measurement is based upon contractual terms with investors and depends on the loan type. Mortgage servicing rights (Level 3 financial instruments as they are measured using significant unobservable inputs such as mortgage prepayment rates, discount rates and delinquency rates) are periodically evaluated for impairment. The amount of impairment is the amount by which the mortgage servicing rights, net of accumulated amortization, exceed their fair value, which is calculated using third-party valuations. Impairment, if any, is recognized through a valuation allowance and a reduction of revenue. The carrying value and fair value of mortgage servicing rights was $9.4 million and $9.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2020. This $0.2 million decrease in the value of our mortgage servicing rights was caused by the disruption in the mortgage industry as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and was recorded as a decrease in revenue to bring the carrying value down to the fair value, for a net valuation allowance and impairment of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2019, the carrying value and fair value of our mortgage servicing rights were both $9.6 million.
The fair value of the Company’s forward sales contracts to broker/dealers solely considers the market price movement of the same type of security between the trade date and the balance sheet date. The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward sales contracts to measure the fair value.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments. IRLCs are extended to certain home-buyinghomebuying customers who have applied for a mortgage loan and meet certain defined credit and underwriting criteria. Typically, the IRLCs will have a term of less than six months; however, in certain markets, the term could extend to nine months.
Some IRLCs are committed to a specific third party investor through the use of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments matching the exact terms of the IRLC loan. Uncommitted IRLCs are considered derivative instruments and are fair value adjusted, with the resulting gain or loss recorded in current earnings.
Forward Sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities. Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (“FMBSs”)FMBSs are used to protect uncommitted IRLC loans against the risk of changes in interest rates between the lock date and the funding date. FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs and FMBSs related to mortgage loans held for sale are classified and accounted for as non-designated derivative instruments and are recorded at fair value, with gains and losses recorded in current earnings.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale.Mortgage loans held for sale consistconsists primarily of single-family residential loans collateralized by the underlying property. Generally, all of the mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold to third-party investors shortly after origination. During the period between when a loan is closed and when it is sold to an investor, the interest rate risk is covered through the use of a best-effortswhole loan contract or by FMBSs.
The table below shows the notional amounts of our financial instruments at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Whole loan contracts and related committed IRLCs | $ | 2,354 | | | $ | 1,445 | |
Uncommitted IRLCs | 208,500 | | | 87,340 | |
FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs | 183,000 | | | 88,000 | |
Whole loan contracts and related mortgage loans held for sale | 78,142 | | | 6,125 | |
FMBSs related to mortgage loans held for sale | 131,000 | | | 144,000 | |
Mortgage loans held for sale covered by FMBSs | 148,331 | | | 144,411 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
Best efforts contracts and related committed IRLCs | $ | 2,182 |
| | $ | 6,607 |
|
Uncommitted IRLCs | 50,746 |
| | 66,875 |
|
FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs | 53,000 |
| | 66,000 |
|
Best efforts contracts and related mortgage loans held for sale | 80,956 |
| | 125,348 |
|
FMBSs related to mortgage loans held for sale | 91,000 |
| | 33,000 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale covered by FMBSs | 90,781 |
| | 32,870 |
|
The table below shows the level and measurement of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2017 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 171,580 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 171,580 |
| | $ | — |
|
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | 177 |
| | — |
| | 177 |
| | — |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | 271 |
| | — |
| | 271 |
| | — |
|
Best-efforts contracts | 12 |
| | — |
| | 12 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 172,040 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 172,040 |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description of Financial Instrument (in thousands) | Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2016 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 154,020 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 154,020 |
| | $ | — |
|
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | 230 |
| | — |
| | 230 |
| | — |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | 250 |
| | — |
| | 250 |
| | — |
|
Best-efforts contracts | (90 | ) | | — |
| | (90 | ) | | — |
|
Total | $ | 154,410 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 154,410 |
| | $ | — |
|
The following table sets forth the amount of gain (loss) recognized, within our revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income, on assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
Description (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | Description (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 3,675 |
| | $ | (3,591 | ) | | $ | (590 | ) | Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | 318 | | | $ | (2,261) | | | $ | 3,763 | |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | (53 | ) | | 323 |
| | 89 |
| Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | (1,304) | | | 2,969 | | | (3,482) | |
Interest rate lock commitments | 21 |
| | (71 | ) | | 32 |
| Interest rate lock commitments | 964 | | | (370) | | | 783 | |
Best-efforts contracts | 102 |
| | 116 |
| | (258 | ) | |
Total gain (loss) recognized | $ | 3,745 |
| | $ | (3,223 | ) | | $ | (727 | ) | |
Whole loan contracts | | Whole loan contracts | (360) | | | 173 | | | (231) | |
Total (loss) gain recognized | | Total (loss) gain recognized | $ | (382) | | | $ | 511 | | | $ | 833 | |
The following tables set forth the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments and their location within the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the periods indicated (except for mortgage loans held for sale which isare disclosed as a separate line item):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives |
| | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2020 |
Description of Derivatives | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | | Other assets | | $ | 0 | | | Other liabilities | | $ | 1,640 | |
Interest rate lock commitments | | Other assets | | 1,664 | | | Other liabilities | | 0 | |
Whole loan contracts | | Other assets | | 0 | | | Other liabilities | | 422 | |
Total fair value measurements | | | | $ | 1,664 | | | | | $ | 2,062 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2017 |
Description of Derivatives | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | | Other assets | | $ | 177 |
| | Other liabilities | | $ | — |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | | Other assets | | 271 |
| | Other liabilities | | — |
|
Best-efforts contracts | | Other assets | | 12 |
| | Other liabilities | | — |
|
Total fair value measurements | | | | $ | 460 |
| | | | $ | — |
|
| | | | Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives | | Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2019 |
Description of Derivatives | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) | Description of Derivatives | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value (in thousands) |
Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | | Other assets | | $ | 230 |
| | Other liabilities | | $ | — |
| Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities | | Other assets | | $ | 0 | | | Other liabilities | | $ | 336 | |
Interest rate lock commitments | | Other assets | | 250 |
| | Other liabilities | | — |
| Interest rate lock commitments | | Other assets | | 654 | | | Other liabilities | | 0 | |
Best-efforts contracts | | Other assets | | — |
| | Other liabilities | | 90 |
| |
Whole loan contracts | | Whole loan contracts | | Other assets | | 0 | | | Other liabilities | | 16 | |
Total fair value measurements | | $ | 480 |
| | $ | 90 |
| Total fair value measurements | | $ | 654 | | | $ | 352 | |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures of financial instruments at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
NOTE 4. Inventory and Capitalized Interest
Single-family lots, land and land development costs include raw land that the Company has purchased to develop into lots, costs incurred to develop the raw land into lots, and lots for which development has been completed, but which have not yet been used to start construction of a home.
Homes under construction include homes that are in various stages of construction. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had 1,1341,131 homes (with a carrying value of $242.7$186.9 million) and 9961,459 homes (with a carrying value of $199.4$304.0 million), respectively, included in homes under construction that were not subject to a sales contract.
Model homes and furnishings include homes that are under construction or have been completed and are being used as sales models. The amount also includes the net book value of furnishings included in our model homes. Depreciation on model home furnishings is recorded using an accelerated method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is typically three years.
Land purchase deposits include both refundable and non-refundable amounts paid to third party sellers relating to the purchase of land. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates the land option agreements relating to the land purchase deposits. InThe Company expenses any deposits and accumulated pre-acquisition costs relating to such agreements in the period during whichwhen the Company makes the decision not to proceed with the purchase of land under an agreement,agreement.
NOTE 5. Transactions with Related Parties
NOTE 6. Investment in Joint Venture Arrangements
NOTE 7. Guarantees and Indemnifications
NOTE 8. Commitments and Contingencies
We have received claims related to stucco installation from homeowners in certain of our communities in our Tampa and Orlando, Florida markets and have been named as a defendant in legal proceedings initiated by certain of such homeowners. These claims primarily relate to homes built prior to 2014 which have second story elevations with frame construction.
Our review of the stucco-related issues in our Florida communities is ongoing. Our estimate of future costs of stucco-related repairs is based on our judgment, various assumptions and internal data. Due to the degree of judgment and the potential for variability in our underlying assumptions and data, as we obtain additional information, we may revise our estimate, including to reflect additional estimated future stuccostucco-related repairs costs, which revision could be material.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local examinations by tax authorities for years before 2012.2015. The Company is audited from time to time, and if any adjustments are made, they would be either immaterial or reserved.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. At December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we had no0 unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of the statute of limitations and completion of audits in prior years. We believe that our current income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change.
NOTE 15. Business Segments
The homebuilding operating segments that comprise each of our reportable segments are as follows:
NOTE 16. Supplemental Guarantor InformationShare Repurchase Program
None.
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) was performed by the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172020 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its attestation report included on page 9385 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
None.
To the shareholders and Board of Directors of M/I Homes, Inc.:
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, of the Company and our report dated February 16, 2018,19, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors and all employees of the Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website, www.mihomes.com. We intend to satisfy the requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding disclosure of amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be provided free of charge upon written request directed to Investor Relations, M/I Homes, Inc., 3 Easton Oval,4131 Worth Avenue, Suite 500, Columbus, OH 43219.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 16th19th day of February 2018.2021.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 16th19th day of February 2018.