UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K


(Mark One)

TANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31 2017, 2021
or
£TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from_________to
_________


Commission file number 0-15327


000-15327

CytRx Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware58-1642740
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)Identification No.)
11726 San Vicente Blvd, Suite 650,
Los Angeles, California90049
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant's

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) (310) 826-5648


________________

Securities registered pursuantRegistered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each className of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareThe NASDAQ Capital Market
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase RightsThe NASDAQ Capital Market

None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareCYTROTC Market
Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Securities Act Rule 405). Yes £NoR


Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes £NoR


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesR No £


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YesR No £


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"” “accelerated filer”, "smaller“smaller reporting company"company” and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer £

Non-accelerated filer

Accelerated filer R

Non-accelerated filer £

Smaller reporting company £

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company £


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. £


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes £NoR


Based on the closing price of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s common stock as reported on The NASDAQ CapitalOTC Market, the aggregate market value of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 20172021 (the last business day of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $94.5$35.4 million. Shares of common stock held by directors and executive officers and any ten percent or greater stockholders and their respective affiliates have been excluded from this calculation, because such stockholders may be deemed to be "affiliates"“affiliates” of the Registrant. This is not necessarily determinative of affiliate status for other purposes. The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s common stock as of March 16, 201823, 2022 was 28,037,501.38,801,422.







CYTRX CORPORATION

2017

2021 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page
NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS23
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS4
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS11 17
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS23 36
Item 2. PROPERTIES23 36
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS24 37
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES25 37
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES26 38
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]27 39
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS29 39
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK38 48
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA38 48
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE38 48
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES38 48

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

40 

48

PART IIIItem 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS48
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE41 49
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION48 51
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS61 56
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE62 57
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES63 58
PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITSEXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES64 59
Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY68 62
 SIGNATURES
                           70
SIGNATURES
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #i#

NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

References throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the "Company," "CytRx," "we," "us,"“Company,” “CytRx,” “we,” “us,” and "our,"“our,” except where the context requires otherwise, refer to CytRx Corporation.

If we are not successful in negotiating an agreement with a strategic partner to advance at least one lead compound from our Freiburg operations, we may reduce our headcountCorporation and discontinue certain development programs and drug discovery activities. For these reasons and others, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods. Furthermore, if we obtain marketing approval and successfully commercialize aldoxorubicin, or another product candidate, we anticipate it will take a minimum of two years, and likely longer, for us to generate significant recurring revenue, and we will be dependent on future financing until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain adequate financing would adversely affect our ability to operate as a going concern. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to stockholders may result and new investors could have rights superior to holders of the shares issued in this offering. In addition, debt financing, if available, may include restrictive covenants. If adequate funds are not available to us, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets or to delay or reduce the scope of or eliminate some portion or all of our development programs or clinical trials. We also may have to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves.
References throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the "Company," "CytRx," "we," "us," and "our," except where the context requires otherwise, refer to CytRx Corporation.
its subsidiary.

Some of the information contained in this Annual Report may include forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to our research and development activities, business strategy, business plan, financial performance and other future events. These statements include forward-looking statements both with respect to us, specifically, and the biotechnology sector, in general. We make these statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that include the words "expect," "intend," "plan," "believe," "project," "estimate," "may," "should," "anticipate," "will"“expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” “will” and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements for purposes of the federal securities laws or otherwise.

All forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to, those factors set forth in the sections entitled "Business," "Risk“Business,” “Risk Factors," "Legal” “Legal Proceedings," "Management's” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Quantitative” “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk"Risk” and "Controls“Controls and Procedures"Procedures” in this Annual Report, all of which you should review carefully. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of those risks as you read this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materializes, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we anticipate. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or individuals acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this Note.

INDUSTRY DATA

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this Annual Report concerning our industry, including our general expectations and market opportunity, is based on information from our own management estimates and research, as well as from industry and general publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Management estimates are derived from publicly available information, our knowledge of our industry and assumptions based on such information and knowledge, which we believe to be reasonable. In addition, assumptions and estimates of our and our industry'sindustry’s future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described below in the "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report. These and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates.

TRADEMARKS

CytRx, is oneLADR and ACDx are some of our trademarks used in this Annual Report. This Annual Report also includes trademarks, trade names and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report sometimes appear without the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights, to these trademarks and trade names.

3
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #ii#

PART I


Item 1. BUSINESS

COMPANY OVERVIEW

We are

CytRx Corporation (“CytRx”) is a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology. OurThe Company’s focus ishas been on the discovery, research and clinical development of novel anti-cancer drug candidates that employ novel linker technologies to enhance the accumulation and release of cytotoxic anti-cancer agents at the tumor. Since 2008, we have worked to develop aldoxorubicin. In JulyDuring 2017, we entered into an exclusive worldwide license under which NantCell, Inc. took over development of aldoxorubicin, invested in our common stock and agreed to make future milestone and royalty payments upon the successful development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin.  We are now actively pursuing new anti-cancer compounds through our drugCytRx’s discovery and research operation at our laboratory, facilitieslocated in Freiburg, Germany, ledsynthesized and tested over 75 rationally designed drug conjugates with highly potent payloads, culminating in the creation of two distinct classes of compounds. Four lead candidates (LADR-7 through LADR-10) were selected based on in vitro and animal studies, in several different cancer models, stability, and manufacturing feasibility. In addition, a novel albumin companion diagnostic, ACDx™, was developed to identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with these drug candidates.

On June 1, 2018, CytRx launched Centurion BioPharma Corporation (“Centurion”), a private subsidiary, and transferred all of its assets, liabilities and personnel associated with the laboratory operations in Freiburg, Germany. In connection with said transfer, the Company and Centurion entered into a Management Services Agreement whereby the Company agreed to render advisory, consulting, financial and administrative services to Centurion, for which Centurion shall reimburse the Company for the cost of such services plus a 5% service charge. The Management Services Agreement may be terminated by Felix Kratz, Ph.D., Vice Presidenteither party at any time. Centurion is focused on the development of Drug Discoverypersonalized medicine for solid tumor treatment. On December 21, 2018, CytRx announced that Centurion had concluded the pre-clinical phase of development for its four LADR™ drug candidates, and inventorfor its albumin companion diagnostic (ACDx™). As a result of aldoxorubicin.

completing this work, operations taking place at the pre-clinical laboratory in Freiburg, Germany would no longer be needed and, accordingly, the lab was closed at the end of January 2019.

We are a Delaware corporation, incorporated in 1985. Our corporate offices are located at 11726 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California 90049, and our telephone number is (310) 826-5648. Our web site is located at http://www.cytrx.com. We do not incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the information on, or accessible through, our website, and you should not consider it as part of this Annual Report.

LADR Drug Discovery Platform

The and Centurion

Centurion’s LADR™ (Linker Activated Drug Release) technology platform is a discovery engine combiningplatform for formulating cytotoxic cancer drugs that offer improved efficacy with reduced side effects. LADR combines our expertise in linker chemistry and albumin biology to create a pipeline of anti-cancer molecules that will avoid unacceptable systemic toxicity while delivering highly potent agents directlydeliver prodrugs to the tumor.  We have created a "toolbox" of linker technologies that have the ability to significantly increase the therapeutic index of ultra-high potency drugs (10-1,000 times more potent than traditional chemotherapies) by controlling the release oftumor environment and then activate the drug payloadsinside the tumor. Such a trojan horse strategy reduces off-target side effects outside the tumor, thus allowing 10-1,000 fold higher dosing to be given.

The first-generation (“gen”) product candidate employing our tumor targeting and improving drug-like properties.


drug release system is aldoxorubicin, described below. Our current effortsnext-gen products are focused oncomposed of two classes of ultra-high potency albumin-binding drug conjugates.conjugates, termed LADR 7 through LADR 10. These drug conjugates combine ourthe proprietary LADR™ linkers with novel derivatives of the auristatin and maytansinoid drug classes. These payloads historically have required a targeting antibody for successful administration to humans. Our drug conjugates eliminate the need for a targeting antibody and provide a small molecule therapeutic option with potential broader applicability.

Our

Centurion’s postulated mechanism of action for the albumin-binding drug conjugates is as follows:

after administration, the linker portion of the drug conjugate forms a rapid and specific covalent bond to the cysteine-34 position of circulating albumin;
circulating albumin preferentially accumulates at the tumors, bypassing concentration in other non-tumor sites, including the heart, liver and gastrointestinal tract due to a mechanism called "Enhanced“Enhanced Permeability and Retention"Retention”;

4

once localized at the tumor, the acid-sensitive linker is cleaved due to the specific conditions within the tumor and in the tumor microenvironment; and
free active drug is then released.released into the tumor.

Our strategy across these programs is

Centurion’s novel companion diagnostic, ACDx™ (albumin companion diagnostic), was developed to generate additional pre-clinical data that will allow themidentify patients with cancer who are most likely to make informed decisions regardingbenefit from treatment with the selection of onefour LADR lead assets.

On March 9, 2022, Centurion was merged into the Company.

Business Strategy for LADR™ Platform

Currently, the Company continues to work on identifying partnership or both programs for moving into human clinical trials either independently or on a partnered basis.


We recently entered into an agreement with Destum Partners, Inc., a leading strategic advisory firm serving companies in the life sciences industry, to assist in our pharma partnering activities. Destum will be our exclusive advisor for the identification of partnershipfinancing opportunities for LADR™ ultra-high potency drug conjugates.
During 2017, our discovery laboratory synthesizedconjugates and tested over 75 rationally designed drug conjugates with highly potent cytotoxic payloads,their albumin companion diagnostic. We have concluded all research and two distinct classes of compounds have been created.  To date, four lead candidates have been selected baseddevelopment on in vitroLADR and animal preclinical studies, stability,its companion diagnostic and manufacturing feasibility.  Additional animal efficacy and toxicology testing of these lead candidates is underway.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #3#


continue to focus on identifying partnership or financing opportunities.

Aldoxorubicin

Until July 2017, we were focusedconcentrating on the research and clinical development of aldoxorubicin, our modified version ofwhich is the widely-used chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin. Aldoxorubicin combines the chemotherapeutic agentcytotoxin doxorubicin, modified with our LADR delivery and concentraction system. Modifying doxorubicin with a novel linker-molecule that binds specifically to albumin in the blood to allowour LADR™ system allows for delivery of higher amounts of doxorubicin (3½ to 4 times) without several of the major dose-limiting toxicities seen with administration of doxorubicin alone.


On July 27, 2017, we entered into an exclusive worldwide license with ImmunityBio, Inc. (formerly known as NantCell, Inc. ("NantCell"(“ImmunityBio”)), granting to NantCellImmunityBio the exclusive rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize aldoxorubicin in all indications, and our companyindications. As a result, the Company is no longer directly working on development of aldoxorubicin.aldoxorubicin (ImmunityBio merged with NantKwest, Inc. in March 2021). As part of the license, NantCellImmunityBio made a strategic investment of $13 million in CytRx common stock at $6.60 per share, (adjusted to reflect our 2017 reverse stock split), a premium of 92% to the market price on that date. We also issued NantCellImmunityBio a warrant to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock at $6.60, over the following 18 months.which expired on January 26, 2019. We are entitled to receive up to an aggregate of $343 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon achievement of certain regulatory approvals and commercial milestones. We are also entitled to receive ascending double-digit royalties for net sales for soft tissue sarcomas and mid to high single digit royalties for other indications.


There can be no assurance that ImmunityBio will achieve such milestones, approvals or sales with respect to aldoxorubicin. ImmunityBio has initiated a Phase 2, randomized, three-cohort, open-label registrational-intent study for first-line and second-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, which includes aldoxorubicin. On October 13, 2021, ImmunityBio announced that the trial’s Cohort C was fully enrolled. In January 2022 at the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, they reported that 27% of third-line or greater patients (17/63) remain on study and that the median overall survival in this highly advanced group of patients (who failed two to six prior lines of treatment) is 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.9, 6.9 months) exceeding the approximately three-month historical median overall survival. Of the 63 patients, 30 (48%) had progressed after two prior lines of therapy. Median overall survival in this group was 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.0, 9.8 months), more than doubling the historical overall survival. (Survival of three months as reported by Manax et al ASCO GI 2019). In Cohort C, four patients (7%) experienced treatment-related SAEs that included peripheral edema, pyrexia, anemia and atrial flutter. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Based on the strength of earlier data and the significant unmet medical need, ImmunityBio submitted an amendment to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) to increase enrollment in Cohort C and plan to meet with the FDA in 2022 to discuss a potential path for the approval of combination therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Aldoxorubicin is a conjugate of the commonly prescribed chemotherapeuticcytotoxin agent doxorubicin that binds to circulating albumin in the bloodstream and is believed to concentrate the drug at the site of the tumor. Aldoxorubicin, our lead clinical candidate, has been tested in over 600 patients with various types of cancer. Specifically, it is comprised of (6-maleimidocaproyl) hydrazine, an acid-sensitive molecule that is conjugated to doxorubicin. The initial indication for aldoxorubicin iswas for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

5

Aldoxorubicin has received Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of STS. ODD provides several benefits, including seven years of market exclusivity after approval, certain R&D related tax credits, and protocol assistance by the FDA. European regulators granted aldoxorubicin Orphan designation for STS, which confers ten years of market exclusivity, among other benefits.


In the first quarter of 2018, we announced that NantCell was expanding aldoxorubicin's use by combining it with immunotherapies and cell-based treatments, specifically

ImmunityBio also lists ongoing clinical studies in metastatic pancreatic cancer and in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or non-small cell lung cancer.


OUR CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
Our current clinical development programs are discussed below.
Aldoxorubicin
Aldoxorubicin is a conjugate of the commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin that binds to circulating albumin in the bloodstream and is believed to concentrate the drug at the site of tumors.  Specifically, it is comprised of (6-maleimidocaproyl) hydrazine, an acid-sensitive molecule that is conjugated to doxorubicin. Aldoxorubicin was out-licensed to NantCell in July 2017.
Aldoxorubicin for the Treatment of Cancer. Anthracyclines are a class of drugs that are among the most commonly used agents in the treatment of cancer. Doxorubicin, the first anthracycline to gain FDA approval, has demonstrated efficacy in a wide variety of cancers, includingtriple-negative breast cancer lung cancer, ovarian cancer, sarcomas, and lymphomas. However, due to the uptake of doxorubicin by various parts of the body, it is associated with side effects such as cumulative cardiotoxicity, myelosuppression (decreased production of blood cells by bone marrow), gastrointestinal disorders, mucositis (inflammation of the mucous membranes lining the mouth and digestive tract), stomatitis (inflammation of soft tissue of the mouth), and necrotizing extravasation (damage due to the leakage of intravenous drugs from the vein into the surrounding tissue).
We believe aldoxorubicin has attributes that may improve on doxorubicin, alone, which we sometimes refer to as native doxorubicin, including the potential to increase the total doxorubicin dose, reduce certain adverse events associated with native doxorubicin, achieve increased drug concentration at tumor sites and improve efficacy.
Pre-clinical data. Insubmitted a variety of preclinical models, aldoxorubicin was superior to doxorubicin at equitoxic doses in its ability to allow an increase in the total doxorubicin dose, its antitumor efficacy and its safety, including a reduction in cardiotoxicity. Animal studies conducted by aldoxorubicin inventor Dr. Felix Kratz demonstrated statistically significant efficacy compared to both placebo and native doxorubicin against breast, ovarian, pancreatic and small cell lung cancer models growing in immunodeficient mice.
Clinical data. In July 2016, we announced the initial analysis of top-line data from our on-going global, randomized Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory soft tissue sarcomas, or STS. The trial enrolled 433 patients.  Aldoxorubicin performed better than investigator's choice for the entire study population, and narrowly missed statistical significance in progression-free survival, or PFS (p=0.12; HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.06), the trial's primary endpoint.  All responses were determined by an independent, blinded central radiology lab assessment of scans.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #4#

On November 29, 2016, we announced updated results from the Phase 3 clinical trial, which demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS between aldoxorubicin and investigator's choice therapy in 246 patients with either leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma, (p=0.007).  The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.88), representing a 38% reduction in the risk of tumor progression for patients receiving aldoxorubicin versus investigator's choice.  Leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma, the two most common types of STS, accounted for 57% of the patients enrolled in the overall trial.  Aldoxorubicin also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS over investigator's choice in 312 patients treated in North America plus Australia (p=0.028; HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.97).
Aldoxorubicin did not cause clinically significant cardiac, renal, or hepatic toxicities.  For the global trial population, the most commonly reported adverse events were neutropenia and anemia consistent with prior clinical trials with aldoxorubicin. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were manageable with supportive care and occurred at a rate of 61% for patients receiving aldoxorubicin and 46% in patients treated with investigator's choice.  Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 4.2% of patients treated with aldoxorubicin, compared to 6.3% for patients receiving investigator's choice.  Serious adverse events, primarily febrile neutropenia that resolved and rarely led to treatment termination occurred more frequently in patients administered aldoxorubicin.  Three treatment-related deaths occurred in aldoxorubicin-treated patients, while there were no treatment-related deaths among patients receiving investigators' choice of drugs.
Based upon the updated results of the Phase 3 trial, we metprotocol with the FDA for glioblastoma; it is currently reviewing its options in the first quarter of 2017. Following the meeting with the FDA, we announced that we planned to pursue a 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for a New Drug Application (NDA) filing.
We completed our global Phase 2b clinical trial to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of aldoxorubicin as a first-line therapy in patients with advanced STS who are ineligible for surgery. The 123-subject Phase 2b clinical trial provided the first direct clinical trial comparison of aldoxorubicin and native doxorubicin as a first-line therapy for STS. The primary endpoint was PFS as determined by a blinded radiology review performed at an independent central radiology laboratory. The results from this trial were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Oncology in September 2015 (JAMA Oncology 2015 Sep 17:1-9.).
In the Phase 2b clinical trial, aldoxorubicin was found to be relatively safe and well-tolerated. Subjects treated with aldoxorubicin had an approximately two-fold increase in severe neutropenia compared with doxorubicin-treated subjects, but there was no difference in the incidence of febrile neutropenia (indicating an infection may be present) between the two groups. All adverse events in subjects treated with aldoxorubicin were consistent with the known side effects of doxorubicin, usually resolved before the administration of the next dose and did not require treatment discontinuation. There were no treatment-related deaths in the aldoxorubicin group.
A Phase 1 study of aldoxorubicin that demonstrated safety and objective clinical responses in several tumor types was completed in 2005 and published in Clinical Cancer Research in August 2007.  Of 35 evaluable patients, 23 had either an objective clinical (partial) response or stable disease.
We completed a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial with aldoxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors who had either relapsed or failed to respond to their prior chemotherapy. Clinical benefit was shown in ten of 13 (76.9%) evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory STS. There were no observed cardiac toxicities and no drug-related patient deaths. The results of this clinical trial were published in February 2015 in the peer-reviewed journal Cancer (Cancer, 2015 Feb 15; 121(4); 570-9).
Our Phase 1b clinical trial evaluating pharmacokinetics demonstrated that aldoxorubicin has a distribution half-life of approximately 20 to 24 hours, with a narrow volume of distribution to healthy tissue and slow clearance from the circulation. Complete details from this trial were published in the journal Investigational New Drugs (Invest New Drugs, 2015 Apr 15; (33(2):341-8).
In September 2016, we completed enrollment in our global Phase 2b clinical trial evaluating aldoxorubicin compared to topotecan in subjects with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have relapsed or were refractory to prior chemotherapy. The open-label Phase 2b clinical trial enroll approximately 135 patients (1:1 randomization).  The primary endpoint is PFS and the secondary endpoints are OS, overall response rates (partial and complete) and the safety of aldoxorubicin compared to topotecan in this population.  This trial was ongoing when aldoxorubicin was out-licensed to NantCell, Inc.
 We completed a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the preliminary efficacy and safety of aldoxorubicin in patients with unresectable glioblastoma whose tumors have progressed following prior treatment with surgery, radiation and with the drug temozolomide. The clinical trial has enrolled its target of 28 patients and demonstrated that an albumin-binding therapy can enter the brain and have anti-tumor activity. At the 2016 American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, the trial results were presented including the median overall survival of 8.6 months.
We completed a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the preliminary efficacy of aldoxorubicin in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. Results presented at the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting showed that aldoxorubicin localized in the tumor lesions and compared to non-tumor tissues.  Eleven of 13 patients (85%) treated with low dose aldoxorubicin achieved a partial response at week four.
We also conducted a Phase 1b/2 trial in combination with ifosfamide in patients with STS, and completed a Phase 1b trial in combination with gemcitabine in subjects with metastatic solid tumors. Since most chemotherapy agents are administered in combination with other chemotherapeutics, these studies will demonstrate the dose of aldoxorubicin that can be administered with two other chemotherapies that are commonly used to treated patients with sarcomas, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer and lung cancer.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #5#

Disposition of

Molecular Chaperone Assets

Until (Orphayzme)

In 2011, we ownedCytRx sold the rights to two drug candidates, arimoclomol and iroxanadine, based on molecular chaperone regulation technology, that were designed to repair or degrade mis-folded proteins associated with disease. On May 13, 2011, we sold all pre-clinical and clinical data, intellectual property rights and other assets relating to those compounds to Orphazyme ApSA/S (formerly Orphazyme ApS) in exchange for a cashone-time, upfront payment of $150,000 and the right to receive various futureup to a total of $120 million in milestone payments that are contingent upon the achievement of specifiedcertain pre-specified regulatory and business milestones, as well as royalty payments based on a specified percentage of any eventual net sales of products derived from arimoclomol. As a result of Orphazyme’s disclosure that the assets. 

pivotal phase 3 clinical trial for arimoclomol in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis did not meet its primary and secondary endpoints, the maximum amount that CytRx has the right to receive is now approximately $100 million. Orphazyme is testing arimoclomol in Niemann-Pick disease Type C (“NPC”) and Gaucher disease. Orphazyme has highlighted positive Phase 2/3 clinical trial data in patients with NPC and previously submitted a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the FDA. On June 18, 2021, Orphazyme announced it had received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA indicating the need for additional data. In late October 2021, Orphazyme announced it held a Type A meeting with the FDA, at which the FDA recommended that Orphazyme submit additional data, information and analyses to address certain topics in the Complete Response Letter and engage in further interactions with the FDA to identify a pathway to resubmission. The FDA concurred with Orphazyme’s proposal to remove the cognition domain from the NPC Clinical Severity Scale (“NPCCSS”) endpoint, with the result that the primary endpoint is permitted to be recalculated using the 4- domain NPCCSS, subject to the submission of additional requested information which Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it intends to provide. To bolster the confirmatory evidence already submitted, the FDA affirmed that it would require additional in vivo or pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Orphazyme is planning to request a Type C Meeting with the FDA in the second quarter of 2022. Subject to discussions with the regulatory body, Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it plans to resubmit the NDA for arimoclomol in the second half of 2022.

Orphazyme had also submitted a Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”) with the European Medicines Agency (the “EMA”). In February 2022, Orphazyme announced that although they had received positive feedback from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) of the EMA, they were notified by the CHMP of a negative trend vote on the MAA for arimoclomol for NPC following an oral explanation. The trend vote indicates that the CHMP’s current orientation is to not approve arimoclomol when it convenes by the end of March 2022. Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it considers it unlikely that this position will change before the formal vote is undertaken in March 2022. Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it will assess its strategic options and provide an update to the market at the applicable time.

Innovive Acquisition Agreement

On September 19, 2008, we completed our merger acquisition of Innovive Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Innovive, and its clinical-stage cancer product candidates, including aldoxorubicin and tamibarotene. Under the merger agreement by which we acquired Innovive, we agreed to pay the former Innovive stockholders up to approximately $18.3 million of future earnout merger consideration, subject to our achievement of specified net sales under the Innovive license agreements. The earnout merger consideration, if any, will be payable in shares of our common stock, subject to specified conditions, or, at our election, in cash or by a combination of shares of our common stock and cash. Our common stock will be valued for purposes of any future earnout merger consideration based upon the trading price of our common stock at the time the earnout merger consideration is paid. The earnout will be accrued if and when earned.

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, no amounts were due under this agreement.

Research and Development

Expenditures for research and development activities related to continuing operations were $19.8 million, $35.9 million$0 for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $43.4$0.8 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively,2020, or approximately 60%, 68%0% and 68%12%, respectively, of our total expenses. For further information regarding our research and development activities, see "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” below.

6

Manufacturing
We do not have the facilities or expertise to manufacture clinical supplies of aldoxorubicin or any of our other product candidates, and we lack the resources and capability to manufacture any of our product candidates on a commercial scale. Accordingly, we are dependent upon third-party manufactures, or potential future strategic alliance partners, to manufacture these supplies. Currently, we are no longer responsible for manufacturing aldoxorubicin, having entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with NantCell, Inc.

Commercialization and Marketing

We currently have no sales, marketing or commercial product distribution capabilities or experience in marketing products.

As additional product

We are searching for a development and commercialization partner or a financing for our LADR drug candidates advance through our pipeline, ourand do not currently plan on commercializing them ourselves. Over the past two years, we have been unable to attract a development and commercial plans may change. In particular, some of our pipeline assets target potentially large solid tumor indications.  Factors such as clinical data, the size of the development programs, the size of the target market, the size ofpartner nor a commercial infrastructure, and manufacturing needs may influence our strategies in the U.S., the European Union, and other territories.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #6#

financing for this endeavor; however, we are continuing to pursue all possibilities.

Patents and Proprietary Technology

We actively seek patent protection for our technologies, processes, uses, and ongoing improvements and consider our patents and other intellectual property to be critical to our business. We regularly evaluate the patentability of new inventions and improvements developed by us or our collaborators, and, whenever appropriate, will endeavor to file U.S. and international patent applications to protect these new inventions and improvements. We cannot be certain that any of the current pending patent applications we have filed or licensed, or any new patent applications we may file or license, will ever be issued in the U.S. or any other country. There also is no assurance that any issued patents will be effective to prevent others from using our products or processes. It is also possible that any patents issued to us, as well as those we have licensed or may license in the future, may be held invalid or unenforceable by a court, or third parties could obtain patents that we would need to either license or to design around, which we may be unable to do. Current and future competitors may have licensed or filed patent applications or received patents and may acquire additional patents and proprietary rights relating to compounds, products or processes that may be competitive with ours.

In addition to patent protection, we attempt to protect our proprietary products, processes and other information by relying on trade secrets and non-disclosure agreements with our employees, consultants and certain other persons who have access to such products, processes and information. Under the agreements, all inventions conceived by employees are our exclusive property, but there is no assurance that these agreements will afford significant protection against misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets and confidential information.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, we have three pending U.S. patent applications and thirteenthirty-eight pending foreign patent applications and twenty-two granted foreign patents covering our LADRTM-related technology including LADR-7, LADR-8, LADR-9 and DK049.LADR-10. The unextendedun-extended patent term of patents that issue covering our LADRTM-related technology is between June 2036 and November 2038. We also have one pending US patent application and fourteen pending foreign patent applications covering our albumin companion diagnostic (ACDxTM). The un-extended patent term of patents that issue covering our ACDxTM is July 2039. The patents and patent applications covering our LADRTM-related technology, and DK049 is June 2038.ACDxTM are assigned to Centurion BioPharma Corporation. In conjunction with our July 27, 2017 NantCellImmunityBio licensing agreement, we granted NantCellImmunityBio an exclusive license to all our aldoxorubicin-related patents, including the rights in fourthree granted U.S. patents, 72eighteen granted foreign patents two pending U.S. patent applications, and fourteeneight pending foreign patent applications covering aldoxorubicin and related technologies. Our intellectual property holdings relating to aldoxorubicin, and related technologies include an exclusive license from Vergell Medical, S.A. or Vergell, to U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications.Vergell. Patents and applications that cover pharmaceutical compositions ofcomprising aldoxorubicin processes for their production, and their use in treatment methods (e.g.,treating cancer (including glioblastoma), viral diseases, autoimmune diseases, and acute or chronic inflammatory diseases) have unextendedun-extended patent terms expiring between June 2020December 2033 and June 2034.


LICENSE AGREEMENTS

Aldoxorubicin

We are the licensee of patent rights held by KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH (“KTB”) for the worldwide development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin under a license agreement dated April 17, 2006. In February 2017, we received notice that KTB had transferred and assigned its rights and obligations under the license to Vergell Medical, S.A., or Vergell. The license is exclusive and applies to all products that may be subject to the licensed intellectual property in all fields of use. We may sublicense the intellectual property in our sole discretion. Pursuant to an amendment to the license agreement entered into in March 2014, we also have a non-exclusive worldwide license to any additional technology that is claimed or disclosed in the licensed patents and patent applications for use in the field of oncology.

7

Under the agreement, we must make payments to Vergell in the aggregate of up to $7.5 million upon meeting clinical and regulatory milestones, and up to and including the product'sproduct’s second final marketing approval. We also agreed to pay:

commercially reasonable royalties based on a percentage of net sales (as defined in the agreement);
a percentage of any non-royalty sub-licensing income (as defined in the agreement); and
milestones of $1 million for each additional final marketing approval that we obtain.

In the event that we must pay a third party in order to exercise our rights to the intellectual property under the agreement, we are entitled to deduct a percentage of those payments from the royalties due Vergell, up to an agreed upon cap.

Under the agreement with Vergell, we must use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct the research and development activities we determine are necessary to obtain regulatory approval to market aldoxorubicin in those countries that we determine are commercially feasible. Under the agreement, Vergell is to use its commercially reasonable efforts to provide us with access to suppliers of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, of aldoxorubicin, on the same terms and conditions as may be provided to Vergell by those suppliers.

The agreement will expire on a product-by-product basis upon the expiration of the subject patent rights. We have the right to terminate the agreement on 30 days'days’ notice, provided we pay a cash penalty to Vergell. Vergell may terminate the agreement if we are in breach and the breach is not cured within a specified cure period, or if we fail to use diligent and commercial efforts to meet specified clinical milestones.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #7#

Molecular Chaperone Assets

The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to arimoclomol provides for our payment up to an aggregate of $3.65 million upon receipt of milestone payments from Orphazyme.

Competition

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. While we believe that our LADR™ technology platform and ultra-high potency albumin-bind drug conjugates provide us with competitive advantages, we face potential competition from many different sources, including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions. Any drug candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future.

Many competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater scientific, research and product development capabilities, as well as greater financial, marketing and human resources than we do. In addition, many specialized biotechnology firms have formed collaborations with large, established companies to support the research, development and commercialization of products that may be competitive with ours.


There are many companies developing antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) for the treatment of cancer and some that use the same classes of cytotoxic payloads as we are currently using. These include Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Seattle Genetics Inc. who market Adcetris®, and F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd./Genentech who market Kadcyla®. According to www.clinicaltrials.gov, theremany other major pharmaceutical companies, including Celgene and GlaxoSmithKline are approximately 75 clinical trials testing an ADC that arein either on-going or currently enrolling.enrolling clinical trials. Other companies have created or have programs to create potent cell‑killingcell-killing agents for attachment to antibodies or other targeting agents. These companies may compete with us for technology out‑licenseout-license arrangements.

In addition to ADCs, we face competition from other nanomedicine platforms developing targeted therapies, including platforms focused on nanoparticles and liposomes. Non‑ADCNon-ADC therapies may be in development for the cancer types we or our partners elect to pursue. Further, these companies may also compete with us for technology out‑licenseout-license arrangements.

Continuing development of conventional and targeted chemotherapeuticscytotoxins by large pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies may result in new compounds that may compete with our product candidates. More recently, immuno-oncology therapies that stimulate the body'sbody’s own defense system to attack cancers are being developed by certain of these companies and some have been approved for use as cancer therapeutics. In the future, immuno-oncology agents including cell therapies, targeted therapies or cytotoxic treatments may compete with our product candidates. Other companies have created or have programs to create potent cell‑killingcell-killing agents for attachment to tumor targeting agents. These companies may compete with us for technology out‑licenseout-license arrangements.

Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we obtain approval for ours. In addition, our ability to compete may be affected in many cases by insurers or other third-party payors seeking to encourage the use of generic products. If our drug candidates achieve marketing approval, we expect that they will be priced at a significant premium over competitive generic products.

8

Many companies, including large pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms with financial resources, research and development staffs, and facilities that may be substantially greater than those of ours or our strategic partners or licensees, are engaged in the research and development of pharmaceutical products that could compete with our potential products. To the extent that we seek to acquire, through license or otherwise, existing or potential new products, we will be competing with numerous other companies, many of which will have substantially greater financial resources, large acquisition and research and development staffs that may give those companies a competitive advantage over us in identifying and evaluating these drug acquisition opportunities. Any products that we acquire will be competing with products marketed by companies that in many cases will have substantially greater marketing resources than we have. The industry is characterized by rapid technological advances and competitors may develop their products more rapidly and such products may be more effective than those currently under development or that may be developed in the future by our strategic partners or licensees. Competitive products for a number of the disease indications that we have targeted are currently being marketed by other parties, and additional competitive products are under development and may also include products currently under development that we are not aware of or products that may be developed in the future.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #8#

Government Regulation

Regulation of Pharmaceuticals in the United States

The U.S. and other developed countries extensively regulate the preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, export, marketing and distribution of drugs and biologic products. TheIn the United States, the FDA, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), the Public Health Service (“PHS”) Act and other federal statutes and regulations, regulates pharmaceutical and biologic products.

products and product candidates, and the parties engaged in the development, testing, manufacture, distribution, storage, marketing, labeling, advertising, and/or commercialization thereof (in addition to any other related activities) are subject to rigorous pre- and post-market requirements.

To obtain FDA approval of our product candidates from the FDA,for a new drug candidate, we must, among other requirements, submit data supporting the candidate’s safety and efficacy for the intended indicationindication(s), as well as detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product candidate. In most cases, this will require extensive laboratory tests and preclinical and clinical trials. The collection of these data, as well as the preparation of applications for review by the FDA involve significant time and expense.expense and are inherently complex and uncertain. The FDA may not act quickly or favorably in reviewing these applications, and we (and/or any current or future partners in development) may encounter significant difficulties or costs in our (and/or their) efforts to obtain FDA approvals that could delay or preclude the U.S. commercialization of one or more of our product candidates.

The process required by the FDA before a new drug may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves some or all of the following key steps:

completion of nonclinical studies, such as laboratory tests, animal studies, and formulation studies, performed in compliance with FDA regulations for good laboratory practices (“GLPs”) and other applicable regulations;
design of a clinical protocol and its submission to the FDA as part of an Investigational New Drug application (“IND”), which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials according to good clinical practices (“GCPs”) to establish the safety and efficacy of the product candidate for its intended use;
submission of an NDA to the FDA along with payment of the application user fee and FDA acceptance of that NDA as a complete submission eligible for substantive review;
satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facilities at which the active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, and finished drug product are produced and tested to assess readiness for commercial manufacturing and conformance to the manufacturing-related elements of the application, to conduct a data integrity audit, and to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”), in order to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug candidate’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
possible inspection of selected clinical study sites to confirm compliance with GCP requirements and data integrity; and
FDA substantive review and approval of the NDA, including satisfactory completion of an FDA advisory committee review of the product candidate, if applicable, which must occur prior to any commercial marketing or sale of the drug product in the United States. Preclinical Studies

9

After a therapeutic candidate is identified for development, it enters the preclinical or nonclinical testing stage. Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy. Preclinical tests intended for submission to the FDA to support the safety of a product candidate must be conducted in compliance with GLP regulations and the United States Department of Agriculture’s Animal Welfare Act, if applicable. A drug sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature, among other things, to the FDA as part of an IND. Some nonclinical testing may continue after the IND is submitted. In addition to including the results of the nonclinical studies, the IND will include one or more clinical protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial and the safety and effectiveness criteria to be evaluated.

An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the clinical trial on a clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result, submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence. A clinical hold may occur at any time during the life of an IND and may affect one or more specific studies or all studies conducted under the IND. Occasionally, clinical holds are imposed due to manufacturing issues that may present safety issues for the clinical study subjects.

Human Clinical Trials in Support of an NDA

The clinical investigation of an investigational new drug is divided into three phases that typically are conducted sequentially but may overlap or be combined. The three phases are as follows:

Phase 1. Phase 1 includes initial clinical trials introducing an investigational new drug into humans and may be conducted in subjects with the target disease or healthy volunteers. These trials are designed to determine the metabolism and pharmacologic actions of the drug in humans, the side effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, to gain early evidence on effectiveness.
Phase 2. Phase 2 includes the controlled clinical trials conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug candidate for a particular indication or indications in subjects with the disease or condition under study and to determine the common short-term side effects and risks associated with the drug. Phase 2 trials are typically well controlled, closely monitored, and conducted in a relatively small number of subjects.
Phase 3. Phase 3 trials are typically large trials performed after preliminary evidence suggesting effectiveness of the drug candidate has been obtained. They are intended to gather additional information about the effectiveness and safety that is needed to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug and to provide an adequate basis for physician labeling and product marketing approval. Phase 3 trials usually are conducted at geographically dispersed clinical study sites.

A clinical trial may combine the elements of more than one phase and the FDA often requires more than one Phase 3 trial to support marketing approval of a product candidate. A company’s designation of a clinical trial as being of a particular phase is not necessarily indicative that the study will be sufficient to satisfy the FDA requirements of that phase because this determination cannot be made until the protocol and data have been submitted to and reviewed by the FDA. Human clinical trials are inherently uncertain and Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 testing may not be successfully completed.

A pivotal trial is a clinical trial that is believed to satisfy FDA requirements for the evaluation of a product candidate’s safety and efficacy such that it can be used, alone or with other pivotal or non-pivotal trials, to support regulatory approval. Generally, pivotal trials are Phase 3 trials, but they may be Phase 2 trials if the design provides a well-controlled and reliable assessment of clinical benefit, particularly in an area of unmet medical need.

10

Clinical trials must be conducted under the supervision of one or more qualified investigators in accordance with the FDA’s GCP requirements. They must be conducted under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, dosing procedures, research subject selection and exclusion criteria and the safety and effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol, and any subsequent material amendment to the protocol, must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND, and progress reports detailing the status of the clinical trials must be submitted to the FDA annually. Sponsors also must report to the FDA serious and unexpected adverse reactions in a timely manner, any clinically important increase in the rate of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigation brochure or any findings from other studies or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the product or therapeutic candidate. The FDA may order the temporary or permanent discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time, via a clinical hold, or impose other sanctions if it believes that the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with FDA requirements or that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. An institutional review board (“IRB”), is responsible for ensuring that human subjects in clinical studies are protected from inappropriate study risks. An IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the protocol before a clinical trial commences at that institution and must also approve the information regarding the trial and the consent form that must be provided to each research subject or the subject’s legal representative, monitor the trial until completed and otherwise comply with IRB regulations. The IRB also may require post-marketinghalt a study, either temporarily or permanently, for failure to comply with GCP or the IRB’s requirements, or if the investigational new drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.

During the development of a new drug product candidate, sponsors are given opportunities to meet with the FDA at certain points; specifically, prior to the submission of an IND, at the end of Phase 2 and before an NDA is submitted. Meetings at other times may be requested. These meetings can provide an opportunity for the sponsor to share information about the data gathered to date and for the FDA to provide advice on the next phase of development. Sponsors typically use the meeting at the end of Phase 2 to discuss their Phase 2 clinical results and present their plans for the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial that they believe will support the approval of the new therapeutic.

Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as “Phase 4” clinical trials, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication. In certain instances, FDA may mandate the performance of “Phase 4” clinical trials.

Concurrent with clinical trials, sponsors usually complete additional animal safety studies, develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product candidate and finalize a process for manufacturing commercial quantities of the product candidate in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other criteria, the sponsor must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, and purity of the finished drug product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to monitordemonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

Marketing Application Submission and FDA Review

Assuming successful completion of all required testing in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements, detailed information on the product candidate is submitted to the FDA in the form of an NDA requesting approval to market the drug for one or more indications. An NDA includes all relevant data available from pertinent nonclinical studies and clinical trials, including negative or ambiguous results as well as positive findings, together with detailed information on the product candidate’s chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, or CMC, and proposed labeling, among other things. To support marketing approval, the data submitted must be sufficient in quality and quantity to establish the safety and efficacy of approved products or place conditions on any approvals that could restrict the therapeutic claims and commercial applications of these products. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals if we fail to comply with regulatory standards or if we encounter problems at any time following initial marketing of our products.

The first stage of the FDA approval process for a new drug involves completion of preclinical studies and the submission of the results of these studies to the FDA. These data, together with proposed clinical protocols, manufacturing information, analytical data and other information submitted to the FDA, in an investigational new drug application, or IND, must become effective before human clinical trials may commence. Preclinical studies generally involve FDA regulated laboratory evaluation of product characteristics and animal studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the product candidate.

After the IND becomes effective, a company may commence human clinical trials. These are typically conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap. Phase 1 trials consist of testing of the product candidate for its intended use to the satisfaction of the FDA.

Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”), each NDA must be accompanied by a significant user fee. The FDA adjusts the PDUFA user fees on an annual basis. PDUFA also imposes an annual program fee for prescription drug products. Fee waivers or reductions are available in certain circumstances, such as where a waiver is necessary to protect the public health, where the fee would present a significant barrier to innovation, or where the applicant is a small number of patients or healthy volunteers, primarilybusiness submitting its first human therapeutic application for safety at one or more doses. Phase 2 trials, in additionreview.

Under the goals and policies agreed to safety, evaluate the efficacy of the product candidate in a patient population somewhat larger than Phase 1 trials. Phase 3 trials typically involve additional testing for safety and clinical efficacy in an expanded population at multiple test sites. A company must submit toby the FDA under PDUFA, the FDA has ten months from receipt in which to complete its initial review of a clinical protocol, accompaniedstandard NDA for a drug that is not a new molecular entity, and six months from the receipt date for an application with priority review. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA goal dates, and the review process is often significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification and a sponsor’s process to respond to such inquiries. As a result, the approval of the Institutional Review Boards at the institutions participating in the trial, prior to commencement of each clinical trial.

ToNDA review process can be very lengthy. Most innovative drug products (other than biological products) obtain FDA marketing authorization, a company must submitapproval pursuant to the FDA the resultsan NDA submitted under Section 505(b)(1) of the preclinical and clinical testing, together with, among other things, detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product candidate, in the form ofFDCA, commonly referred to as a new drug application, ortraditional (or full) NDA.

11
The amount of time taken by the FDA for approval of an NDA will depend upon a number of factors, including whether the product candidate has received priority review, the quality of the submission and studies presented, the potential contribution that the compound will make in improving the treatment of the disease in question, and the workload at the FDA.

The FDA may, in some cases, confer upon an investigational product the status of a fast-track product. A fast-track product is defined as a new drug or biologic intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition that demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition. The FDA can base approval of an NDA for a fast-track product on an effect on a surrogate endpoint, or on another endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. Ifconducts a preliminary review of clinical data suggestsall NDAs it receives to ensure that a fast-trackthey are sufficiently complete for substantive review before it accepts them for filing. The FDA may refuse to file any NDA that it deems incomplete or not properly reviewable at the time of submission, and may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application also is subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. The FDA has 60 days after submission of an NDA to conduct an initial review to determine whether it is sufficient to accept for filing. If the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review of the NDA. The FDA reviews the NDA to determine, among other things, whether the proposed product may beis safe and effective for its intended use, whether it has an acceptable purity profile and whether the product is being manufactured in accordance with cGMPs. During its review of an NDA, the FDA may initiate reviewrefer the application to an advisory committee of entire sections of a marketing applicationindependent experts for a fast-track product beforerecommendation as to whether the application should be approved. An advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it typically follows such recommendations. Data from clinical trials are not always conclusive, and the FDA or its advisory committee may interpret data differently than the NDA sponsor completesinterprets the application.

We anticipate that our products will be manufactured by our strategic partners, licensees or other third parties. same data. The FDA may also re-analyze the clinical trial data, which could result in extensive discussions between the FDA and the applicant during the review process.

Before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect the facilities at which the product is manufactured andmanufactured. The FDA will not approve the product unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the FDA'sproduct within required specifications. Additionally, before approving the NDA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure that the clinical trials were conducted in compliance with IND trial requirements and GCP requirements and to assure the integrity of the clinical data submitted to the FDA. To ensure cGMP and GCP compliance by its employees and third-party contractors, an applicant must incur significant expenditure of time, money and effort in the areas of training, record keeping, production and quality control.

The FDA also may require the submission of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or “REMS,” if it determines that a REMS is necessary to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks and to assure the safe use of the product. A REMS could include medication guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans and/or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries or other risk minimization tools. The FDA determines the requirement for a REMS, as well as the specific REMS provisions, on a case-by-case basis. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor must include a proposed REMS within its NDA submission.

After evaluating the NDA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities where the drug product or its API will be produced and the clinical trial sites, the FDA will either issue an approval letter or, in some cases, a complete response letter (“CRL”) that describes all of the specific deficiencies that the FDA has identified in the NDA. A CRL indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete but that the application will not be approved in its present form. The deficiencies identified may be minor (e.g., requiring labeling changes) or major (e.g., requiring additional clinical trials and/or other time-consuming and expensive measures to generate the requisite safety and/or efficacy data). After receiving a CRL, an applicant may either resubmit the NDA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter or withdraw the application. FDA will issue a letter within 30 days of an NDA resubmission acknowledging receipt and informing the applicant as follows. For resubmissions deemed to be complete responses to all deficiencies identified in the CRL, such letter will contain FDA’s designation of the resubmission as Class 1 or Class 2 (based on the nature of information received therein) and the corresponding due date by which it will take action (2 months for Class 1 resubmissions and 6 months for Class 2. If FDA does not find the resubmission to be a complete response to all CRL deficiencies, the FDA will inform the applicant, and the FDA’s “review clock” will not start until a complete response is received.

Even if a drug product receives NDA approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific indications and dosages and/or subject to limitations, specific labeling requirements, and/or other conditions that must be met to lawfully market the product in the United States, any or all of which could restrict the commercial value of the product. For example, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings, and/or precautions be included in the product’s labeling. The FDA may also impose restrictions and conditions on product distribution, prescribing, or dispensing in the form of a REMS, or otherwise limit the scope of any approval. In addition, the FDA may require post marketing clinical trials, sometimes referred to as “Phase 4” clinical trials, designed to further assess a product’s safety and effectiveness, and/or testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized.

12

Post-Approval Requirements for Prescription Drugs

Following approval of a new drug product, the manufacturer and the approved drug are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, monitoring and recordkeeping activities, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, product sampling and distribution restrictions, and promotion and advertising requirements.

Promotional communications must be carefully crafted to ensure compliance with all applicable FDA regulations pertaining to prescription-drug marketing and labeling. In particular, prescription-drug advertisements must generally (1) not be false or misleading, (2) present a “fair balance” of information describing both the risks and benefits associated with the drug, (3) include facts that governare “material” to the manufacture,product’s advertised uses, and (4) include a “brief summary” that mentions every risk described in the product’s labeling. Further, where the intended use of a prescription drug differs from the intended use approved by FDA, as listed in the product’s approved NDA, FDA has asserted that the product is an unapproved “new drug” and taken enforcement action against sponsors for introducing such unapproved new drugs into interstate commerce in violation of the FDCA. This prohibited practice is also called “off-label” promotion. Although physicians may prescribe legally available products for off-label uses, sponsors may not legally market or promote such uses. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.

To market an approved drug product for a new indication (i.e., beyond and/or differing from that set forth in the approved NDA), the sponsor must submit a new NDA (or NDA supplement), which, in many cases, will require the completion of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the product’s safety and efficacy in the new indication. There is no guarantee that FDA will approve an NDA seeking an expansion of an approved drug’s labeling and/or indications for use more quickly than an NDA involving a novel product (i.e., that has never been approved for any indication) or ever. Relatedly, if the sponsor (or a contractor, partner, or other affiliated party) makes any post-market modifications to an approved drug or the production thereof, including changes in labeling or manufacturing processes or facilities, among other things, it may be required to submit and obtain FDA approval of a new NDA or an NDA supplement.

In addition, FDA regulations require that products be manufactured in specific approved facilities and in accordance with cGMPs. The cGMP regulations include requirements relating to organization of personnel, buildings and facilities, equipment, control of components and drug product containers and closures, production and process controls, packaging and labeling controls, holding and distribution, laboratory controls, records and reports and returned or salvaged products. Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and some state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA for compliance with cGMPs and other requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process, specifications or container closure system for an approved drug product are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA regulations also require, among other things, the investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMPs and the imposition of reporting and documentation requirements upon the NDA sponsor and any third-party manufacturers involved in producing the approved drug product. Accordingly, both sponsors and manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort on systems relating to production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance and other aspects of quality control and quality assurance, and to ensure ongoing compliance with other statutory requirements the FDCA. We anticipate that the products we may commercialize in the United States (if any) will be manufactured by our strategic partners (including licensees) or contractors (including any third parties who may be engaged by us or one of our partners to conduct any commercialization activities, as well as downstream subcontractors, as applicable) and we may, thus, be subject to enforcement action for any such third parties’ failures to comply with the applicable postmarket regulations or otherwise be adversely affected by any of our partners’ or contractors’ compliance issues.

The FDA may withdraw its approval for a product. Ourdrug product if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or unexpected problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a drug, including serious and/or unexpected adverse experiences, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies to assess new safety risks; or the imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS.

We and/or our present or future suppliers, contract manufacturers, and/or other affiliates involved in one or more of our current or future U.S. development and/or commercialization activities (if applicable) may not be able to comply with all FDA regulatory requirements. For example, we may believe that all clinical studies are being conducted in accordance with the FDA’s IND regulations and that none of our investigational products are being promoted with claims of safety and/or effectiveness for the intended use(s) for which they are under investigation, but the FDA may determine otherwise, which could subject us to enforcement action and/or delay or prevent the ultimate approval of our applicable product candidate(s). From a postmarket perspective, with regard to any products we may commercialize in the United States in the future, we may believe our manufacturing operations (including that of our partners and/or contractors, as applicable) are fully compliant with cGMPs and that all promotional communications disseminated by or on behalf of us are consistent with FDA’s prescription-drug marketing requirements, but the FDA may disagree and take enforcement action against us. Accordingly, we could be subject to a number of adverse enforcement actions and/or penalties in connection with any failure(s) to comply with the FDCA and/or its implementing regulations at any stage in development and/or commercialization (if applicable), including, but not limited to, the following:

restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of approved products, market withdrawal, recalls;

13

fines, warning letters, untitled letters, public warnings, consumer advisories, “dear doctor” letters, and other similar publications or issuances;
refusal of the FDA to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs;
seizure, detention, import alerts;
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties;
consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, debarment, or exclusion from federal healthcare programs; or
mandated modification of promotional materials and labeling and the issuance of corrective information.

We and our manufacturers and other partners in development and/or (future) commercialization, as applicable, also will be subject to regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Nuclear Energy and Radiation Control Act, the Toxic Substance Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Following approval, the FDA periodically inspects drug and biologic manufacturing facilities to ensure continued compliance with the good manufacturing practices regulations. Our manufacturers will have to continue to comply with those requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements subjects the manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, such as suspension of manufacturing or recall or seizure of product. Adverse patient experiences with the product must be reported to the FDA and could result in the imposition of marketing restrictions through labeling changes or market removal. Product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems concerning safety or efficacy of the product occur following approval.

The labeling, advertising, promotion, marketing and distribution of a drug or biologic product also must be in compliance with FDA and Federal Trade Commission requirements which include, among others, standards and regulations for off-label promotion, industry sponsored scientific and educational activities, promotional activities involving the internet, and direct-to-consumer advertising. We also will be subject to a variety of federal, state and local regulations relating to the use, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials, including chemicals and radioactive and biological materials. In addition, we will be subject to various laws and regulations governing laboratory practices and the experimental use of animals. In each of these areas, as above, the FDA has broad regulatory and enforcement powers, including the ability to levy fines and civil penalties, suspend or delay issuance of product approvals, seize or recall products, and deny or withdraw approvals.

We will also be subject to a variety of regulations governing clinical trials and sales of our products outside the U.S. Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product candidate by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries and regions must be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing the product in those countries. The approval process varies from one regulatory authority to another and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. In the European Union, Canada and Australia, regulatory requirements and approval processes are similar, in principle, to those in the U.SU.S.

Other U.S. Healthcare Laws and Regulations

Healthcare Reform Measures

On March 23, 2010, former President Obama signed the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (P.L. 111-148) (the “ACA”) and on March 30, 2010, he signed the “Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act” (P.L. 111-152), collectively commonly referred to as the “Healthcare Reform Law.” The Healthcare Reform Law included a number of new rules regarding health insurance, the provision of healthcare, conditions to reimbursement for healthcare services provided to Medicare and Medicaid patients, and other healthcare policy reforms. Through the law-making process, substantial changes have been and continue to be made to the current system for paying for healthcare in the U.S., including changes made to extend medical benefits to certain Americans who lacked insurance coverage and to contain or reduce healthcare costs (such as by reducing or conditioning reimbursement amounts for healthcare services and drugs, and imposing additional taxes, fees, and rebate obligations on pharmaceutical and medical device companies). This legislation was one of the most comprehensive and significant reforms ever experienced by the U.S. in the healthcare industry and has significantly changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. This legislation has impacted the scope of healthcare insurance and incentives for consumers and insurance companies, among others. Additionally, the Healthcare Reform Law’s provisions were designed to encourage providers to find cost savings in their clinical operations. Pharmaceuticals represent a significant portion of the cost of providing care. This environment has caused changes in the purchasing habits of consumers and providers and resulted in specific attention to the pricing negotiation, product selection and utilization review surrounding pharmaceuticals. This attention may result in our current commercial products, products we may commercialize or promote in the future, and our therapeutic candidates, being chosen less frequently or the pricing being substantially lowered. At this stage, it is difficult to estimate the full extent of the direct or indirect impact of the Healthcare Reform Law on us.

14

These structural changes could entail further modifications to the existing system of private payors and government programs (such as Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program), creation of government-sponsored healthcare insurance sources, or some combination of both, as well as other changes. Restructuring the coverage of medical care in the U.S. could impact the reimbursement for prescribed drugs and pharmaceuticals, including our current commercial products, those we and our development or commercialization partners are currently developing or those that we may commercialize or promote in the future. If reimbursement for the products we currently commercialize or promote, any product we may commercialize or promote, or approved therapeutic candidates is substantially reduced or otherwise adversely affected in the future, or rebate obligations associated with them are substantially increased, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

Extending medical benefits to those who currently lack coverage will likely result in substantial costs to the U.S. federal government, which may force significant additional changes to the healthcare system in the U.S. Much of the funding for expanded healthcare coverage may be sought through cost savings. While some of these savings may come from realizing greater efficiencies in delivering care, improving the effectiveness of preventive care and enhancing the overall quality of care, much of the cost savings may come from reducing the cost of care and increased enforcement activities. Cost of care could be reduced further by decreasing the level of reimbursement for medical services or products (including our current commercial products, our development or commercialization partners or any product we may commercialize or promote, or those therapeutic candidates currently being developed by us), or by restricting coverage (and, thereby, utilization) of medical services or products. In either case, a reduction in the utilization of, or reimbursement for our current commercial products, any product we may commercialize or promote, or any therapeutic candidate, or for which we receive marketing approval in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

Several states and private entities initially mounted legal challenges to the Healthcare Reform Law, in particular, the ACA, and they continue to litigate various aspects of the legislation. On July 26, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court generally upheld the provisions of the ACA at issue as constitutional. However, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the legislation improperly required the states to expand their Medicaid programs to cover more individuals. As a result, states have a choice as to whether they will expand the number of individuals covered by their respective state Medicaid programs. Some states have not expanded their Medicaid programs and have chosen to develop other cost-saving and coverage measures to provide care to currently uninsured individuals. Many of these efforts to date have included the institution of Medicaid-managed care programs. The manner in which these cost-saving and coverage measures are implemented could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations, particularly once we and/or any of our partners have products on the U.S. market, if ever.

Further, the healthcare regulatory environment has seen significant changes in recent years and is still in flux. Legislative initiatives to modify, limit, replace, or repeal the ACA and judicial challenges have continued. We cannot predict the extent to which our business may be impacted by legal challenges to the ACA or other aspects of the Healthcare Reform Law or other changes to the current laws and regulations. The financial impact of U.S. healthcare reform legislation over the next few years will depend on a number of factors, including the policies reflected in implementing regulations and guidance and changes in sales volumes for therapeutics affected by the legislation. From time to time, legislation is drafted, introduced and passed in the U.S. Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing coverage, reimbursement, and marketing of pharmaceutical products. In addition, third-party payor coverage and reimbursement policies are often revised or interpreted in ways that may significantly affect our business and any products we or our partners may commercialize in the future, as well as the prospects and/or viability of our product candidates.

During his time in office, former President Trump supported the repeal of all or portions of the ACA. President Trump also issued an executive order in which he stated that it is his administration’s policy to seek the prompt repeal of the ACA and in which he directed executive departments and federal agencies to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of the provisions of the ACA to the maximum extent permitted by law. Congress has enacted legislation that repeals certain portions of the ACA, including but not limited to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed in December 2017, which included a provision that eliminates the penalty under the ACA’s individual mandate, effective January 1, 2019, as well as the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, passed in February 2018, which, among other things, repealed the Independent Payment Advisory Board (which was established by the ACA and was intended to reduce the rate of growth in Medicare spending).

Additionally, in December 2018, a district court in Texas held that the individual mandate is unconstitutional and that the rest of the ACA is, therefore, invalid. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the holding on the individual mandate but remanded the case back to the lower court to reassess whether and how such holding affects the validity of the rest of the ACA. The Fifth Circuit’s decision on the individual mandate was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 17, 2021, the Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs (comprised of the state of Texas, as well as numerous other states and certain individuals) did not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the ACA’s individual mandate and, accordingly, vacated the Fifth Circuit’s decision and instructed the district court to dismiss the case. As a result, the ACA will remain in-effect in its current form for the foreseeable future; however, we cannot predict what additional challenges may arise in the future, the outcome thereof, or the impact any such actions may have on our business.

15

The Biden administration also introduced various measures in 2021 focusing on healthcare and drug pricing, in particular. For example, on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace, which began on February 15, 2021, and remained open through August 15, 2021. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. On the legislative front, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was signed into law on March 11, 2021, which, in relevant part, eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source drugs and innovator multiple source drugs, beginning January 1, 2024. And, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order entitled, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a “Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices” that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. And, in November 2021, President Biden announced the “Prescription Drug Pricing Plan” as part of the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376) passed by the House of Representatives on November 19, 2021, which aims to lower prescription drug pricing by, among other things, allowing Medicare to negotiate prices for certain high-cost prescription drugs covered under Medicare Part D and Part B after the drugs have been on the market for a certain number of years and imposing tax penalties on drug manufacturers that refuse to negotiate pricing with Medicare or increase drug prices “faster than inflation.” If enacted, this bill could have a substantial impact on our business. In the coming years, additional legislative and regulatory changes could be made to governmental health programs that could significantly impact pharmaceutical companies and the success of our product candidates. At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

There is uncertainty as to what healthcare programs and regulations may be implemented or changed at the federal and/or state level in the U.S. or the effect of any future legislation or regulation. Furthermore, we cannot predict what actions the Biden administration will implement in connection with the Health Reform Law. However, it is possible that such initiatives could have an adverse effect on our or our partners’ ability to obtain approval for and/or successfully commercialize products in the U.S. in the future.

Fraud and Abuse, Transparency, and Privacy

In the United States, we may be subject to various federal and state laws and regulations regarding fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry, as well as industry standards and guidance, such as the codes issued by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (or “PhRMA Codes”), which some states reference or incorporate in their statutes and regulations. These laws, regulations, standards, and guidance may impact, among other things, our sales and marketing activities and our relationships with healthcare providers and patients. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy regulations by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include but are not limited to:

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order, or recommendation of, an item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the False Claim Act, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from the federal government, including Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors, that are false or fraudulent;

The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which imposes federal criminal and civil liability for executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program and making false statements relating to healthcare matters;

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #9#
16

the federal transparency laws, including the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires applicable manufacturers of covered drugs to disclose payments and other transfers of value provided to physicians and teaching hospitals and physician ownership and investment interests;
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), and its implementing regulations, also imposes certain requirements relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable health information; and
state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers, state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines, state laws that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to report certain pricing or payment information, and state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrow scope of the statutory or regulatory exceptions and safe harbors available, our current or future activities, policies, and/or arrangements could be challenged under one or more of these laws. In addition, the federal government has identified relationships between drug companies (and other medical-product manufacturers) and healthcare providers as particularly susceptible to fraud and abuse and, thus, our relationships may be subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny, particularly once we have one or more products on the U.S. market, if ever. Further, many of the applicable healthcare laws and regulations are subject to varying and/or evolving interpretations, which makes achieving and maintaining consistent compliance more difficult. We may have to devote substantial costs, resources, and time to compliance efforts, particularly once one or more of our product candidates, or any other products to which we may obtain commercialization rights in the future, is marketed in the United States. If any of our past, current, or future operations and/or arrangements are found to be in violation of If our operations are found to be in violation of any healthcare laws or regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal, and/or administrative penalties; damages; fines; personal imprisonment; exclusion from government-funded programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid; additional reporting requirements and oversight under a corporate integrity (or deferred prosecution or other similar) agreement with the applicable federal or state agency or agencies (such as the U.S. Office of Inspector General (“OIG”), the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), or state attorneys general); and/or the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any adverse enforcement action initiated against us based on actual or alleged violations of one or more of the healthcare laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, even if we are ultimately successful in defending against such claims.

Employees

As of March 16, 2018,23, 2022, we had twenty employees, thirteen of whom were engaged in preclinical research at our Freiburg, Germany laboratory, and seven of whom were involved in management and administrative operations.

three full-time employees.

Available Information

We maintain a website at www.cytrx.com and make available there, free of charge, our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, as soon as is reasonably practicable after filing. The public may readAmong other things, we post on our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operationamendments and Code of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.Business Conduct and Ethics. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers such as us that file electronically with the SEC. Among other things, we post on

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

We are subject to various risks that may materially harm our website our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Potential Strategic Alternatives
From time to time, we may consider strategic alternatives available to us to enhance shareholder value. Strategic alternatives could include the acquisition of or strategic partnership with one or more parties or the licensing of some of our proprietary technologies. See "Item 1A – Risk Factors – The impactbusiness, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. An investment in our explorationcommon stock is speculative and involves a high degree of strategic alternatives are uncertainrisk. In evaluating an investment in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information included in this Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and may not be successful."related notes.

17
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties facing our business. The risks described below are not the only ones facing us.risks we face. If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occurs, or if additional risks and uncertainties later materialize, that are not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, then our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment in our shares. The risks discussed below include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Our business is also subject to the risks that affect many other companies, such as employment relations, general economic conditions and geopolitical events. Further, additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may in the future materially and adversely affect our business, operations, liquidity and stock price.

Risk Factor Summary

Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock.

Risks Associated With Our Business:

We have operated at a loss and will likely continue to operate at a loss for the foreseeable future.
Because we have no source of significant recurring revenue, we must depend on capital raising to sustain our operations, and our ability to raise capital may be severely limited.
If Orphazyme fails to successfully develop and commercialize arimoclomol, our business prospects will be materially adversely affected.
If ImmunityBio fails to successfully develop aldoxorubicin or our exclusive licensing arrangement with ImmunityBio is otherwise unsuccessful, our business prospects will be materially adversely affected.

Risks Associated With Drug Discovery and Development:

If the projected development goals for our product candidates are not achieved in the expected time frames, the commercialization of our products may be delayed and our business prospects may suffer. Our financial projections also may prove to be materially inaccurate.
The regulatory approval process is lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if our products or those we have sold or licensed are not successfully developed and approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, we may be forced to reduce or curtail our operations.
Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively.
If our product candidates infringe the rights of others, we could be subject to expensive litigation or be required to obtain licenses from others to develop or market them.
The results of pre-clinical studies or early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and our ultra-high potency albumin-binding drug conjugates may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.
Any products that we develop or are sold or licensed may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations or third-party coverage and reimbursement policies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Healthcare legislative reform measures could hinder or prevent the commercial success of our products and product candidates.
We may also be subject to healthcare laws, regulation and enforcement and our failure to comply with those laws could adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition.
We will be required to pay substantial milestone and other payments relating to the commercialization of our products.
The COVID-19 pandemic could adversely impact our business and prospects, including active and planned clinical trials by ImmunityBio and Orphazyme.
In the event of a dispute regarding our international drug development, it may be necessary for us to resolve the dispute in the foreign country of dispute, where we would be faced with unfamiliar laws and procedures.
Drug discovery is a complex, time-consuming and expensive process, and we may not succeed in creating new product candidates.
We have a limited operating history in drug discovery, which is inherently risky, and we may not succeed in addressing these risks.

18

General Risk Factors:

We are subject to intense competition, and we may not compete successfully.
We are subject to potential liabilities from clinical testing and future product liability claims.
We may be unable to successfully acquire additional technologies or products. If we require additional technologies or products, our product development plans may change and the ownership interests of our shareholders could be diluted.
The impact and results of our exploration of any strategic alternatives are uncertain and may not be successful.
We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively.
Our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.
You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings or other equity issuances.
Our outstanding options and warrants and the availability for resale of the underlying shares may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
We cannot assure investors that our internal controls will prevent future material weaknesses.
We could be subject to legal actions that could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our anti-takeover measures may make it more difficult to change our management, or may discourage others from acquiring us, and thereby adversely affect stockholder value.
Our restated by-laws, as amended, designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees.
We may issue preferred stock in the future, and the terms of the preferred stock may reduce the value of our common stock.
We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock.

Risks Associated With Our Business

We have operated at a loss and will likely continue to operate at a loss for the foreseeable future.

We have operated at a loss due to our ongoing expenditures for research and development of our product candidates and for general and administrative purposes, and lack of significant recurring revenues. We incurred a net loss of $35.0$13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20172021 and $50.8$6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20162020 and had an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 20172021 of $450.9$483.9 million. We are likely to continue to incur losses unless and until we are able to commercialize aldoxorubicin earn milestones and royalties from our existing licensing and sale agreements and/or oneconclude a successful strategic partnership or more offinancing for our other existing or possible future product candidates.LADR™ technology. These losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders'stockholders’ equity and working capital. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with our product development efforts, we are unable to predict when we may become profitable, if at all. If we do not become profitable or are unable to maintain future profitability, the market value of our common stock will be adversely affected.

These factors individually and collectively raise a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in its report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern based on our recurring and continuing losses from operations and our need for additional funding to continue operations. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this going concern uncertainty and have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, we may be forced to liquidate our assets which would have an adverse impact on our business and developmental activities. In such a scenario, the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our financial statements. The reaction of investors to the inclusion of a going concern statement by our independent registered public accounting firm and our potential inability to continue as a going concern may materially adversely affect our stock price and our ability to raise new capital or to enter into strategic alliances.

Because we have no source of significant recurring revenue, we must depend on capital raising to sustain our operations, and our ability to raise capital may be severely limited.

Developing products and conducting clinical trials require substantial amounts of capital. To date,In July 2021, we have relied primarily upon proceeds from saleswere able raise some capital through the sale of our equity securitiescommon stock registered under our "shelf"“shelf” registration statements on Form S-3, filed withas well as through the SECrelated private placement of certain warrants and proceeds from the exercise of optionspreferred investment option. We will likely need to raise additional capital to fund our general and warrantsadministrative expenses and, if we determine to generate funds needed to finance our business and operations. Wedevelop products based on Centurion’s LADR™ technology platform, we will need to raise additional capital to amongfund development of product candidates, prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, enforce and defend patent and other things:

proprietary rights, and develop and implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities. However, we have no available authorized common shares to issue, making capital raising significantly more challenging.

fund development of product candidates based on our LADR™ technology;19
finance our general and administrative expenses
acquire or license new technologies;
prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, enforce and defend our patent and other proprietary rights; and
develop and implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities to successfully commercialize any product for which we obtain marketing approval and choose to market ourselves.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #10#

The depressed market price of our common stock may severely limit our ability to continue to raise capital, because the aggregate or market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates, referred to as our "public float," as of the file date of this Annual Report is less than $75 million.  As a result, under Instruction I.B.6 to Form S-3 the aggregate amount of securities that we can offer and sell under our "shelf" registration statements in any 12-month period cannot exceed one-third of our public float, or approximately $20.5 million as of March 16, 2018.  If our public float increases to $75 million or more, we will no longer be subject to this limitation.

At December 31, 2017,2021, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $37.6 million. Under the terms of the loan agreement, however, we are required to maintain cash equal to a minimum of the greater of three months projected cash burn or $10$6.8 million. Management believes that our current resources will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.through December 31, 2022. This estimate is based, in part, upon our currently projected expenditures for 20182022 and the first three months of 20192023 of approximately $27.8$6.5 million (unaudited), which includes approximately $1.5 million (unaudited) for to fund our clinical programs, approximately $3.1 million (unaudited) for pre-clinical development of new high potency cytotoxic albumin-binding cancer drugs, approximately $0.7 million (unaudited) for general operation of its clinical programs, approximately $10.1 million (unaudited) for other general and administrative expenses and $12.4 million of interest and principal payments on our outstanding term loan.operating activities. These projected expenditures are also based upon numerous other assumptions and subject to many uncertainties, and actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections. While these projections represent our current expected expenditures, we have the ability to reduce the amounts and alter the timing of research and development expenditures as needed to manage its liquidity needs while still advancing its research and development objectives. We will ultimately be required to obtain additional funding in order to execute our long-term business plans, although we do not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide us with long term debt or capital. We cannot assure that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain additional funding when needed, we may not be able to execute our business plans and our business may suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

If we are not successful in negotiating an agreement with a strategic partner to advance at least one lead compound from our Freiburg operations, we may reduce our headcount and discontinue certain development programs and drug discovery activities. For these reasons and others, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods. Furthermore, if we obtain marketing approval and successfully commercialize aldoxorubicin, or another product candidate, we anticipate it will take a minimum of two years, and likely longer, for us to generate significant recurring revenue, and we will be dependent on future financing until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain adequate financing would adversely affect our ability to operate as a going concern.

If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to stockholders may result and new investors could have rights superior to holders of the shares issued in this offering.current equity holders. In addition, debt financing, if available, may include restrictive covenants. If adequate funds are not available to us, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets or to delay or reduce the scope of or eliminate some portion or all of our development programs or clinical trials.programs. We also may have to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves.

On March 15, 2022, CytRx Corporation (the “Company”) held a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), which was originally opened and subsequently adjourned on September 23, 2021, at which meeting the Company’s stockholders, by an affirmative vote of the majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of capital stock, approved the amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to effect an increase in the number of shares of authorized common stock, par value $0.001 per share, from 41,666,666 shares to 62,393,940 shares, and to make a corresponding change to the number of authorized shares of capital stock in order to comply with the Company’s contractual obligations under a securities purchase agreement entered into on July 13, 2021 (the “Authorized Share Increase Amendment”). The number of shares of authorized preferred stock of the Company remains unchanged.

On March 15, 2022, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the”Certificate of Amendment”) with the Secretary of State of Delaware to effect the Authorized Share Increase Amendment.

As of March 23, 2022, we have no additional shares of common stock that are authorized and unissued. We would need approval of our stockholders to increase our authorized shares of our common stock in order to raise additional capital in excess of this amount of shares.

If NantCellOrphazyme fails to successfully develop aldoxorubicin or our exclusive licensing arrangement with NantCell is otherwise unsuccessful,and commercialize arimoclomol, our business prospects will be materially adversely affected.

In July 2017, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with NantCell2011, CytRx sold the rights to completearimoclomol and iroxanadine, based on molecular chaperone regulation technology, to Orphazyme in exchange for a one-time, upfront payment and the right to receive up to a total of $120 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of certain pre-specified regulatory and business milestones, as well as single- and double-digit royalty payments based on a specified percentage of any net sales of products derived from arimoclomol. Orphazyme announced in March and May of 2021 that pivotal phase 3 clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of arimoclomol in treating ALS and IBM, respectively, did not meet their primary or secondary endpoints and that it has ceased development of, and commercializationits pursuit of aldoxorubicin. Under thisregulatory approvals for, arimoclomol for such indications. As a result, the maximum amount that we are eligible to receive in future milestone payments under the agreement NantCell has committed to provide substantial funding,with Orphazyme is now approximately $100 million. There can be no assurance that said amount or any portion thereof will be realized, as such realization is contingent upon certain regulatory approvals of arimoclomol for indications other than the prevention or treatment of ALS or stroke and other contingencies over which we have no control. Orphazyme is testing arimoclomol in NPC and Gaucher disease. On June 18, 2021, Orphazyme announced it received a CRL from the FDA, identifying certain deficiencies in the NDA that precluded its approval. In particular, Orphazyme announced that the CRL was issued based on the need for additional confirmatory evidence, as well as additional qualitative and quantitative evidence to further substantiate the validity of the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (“NPCCSS”), specifically the swallow domain, in the context of a lack of significant capabilitiesfindings when using the FDA’s preferred and recommended statistical approach. In late October 2021, Orphazyme announced it held a Type A meeting with the FDA where the FDA recommended that Orphazyme submit additional data, information and analyses to address certain topics in the CRL and engage in further interactions with the FDA to identify a pathway to resubmission. The FDA concurred with Orphazyme’s proposal to remove the cognition domain from the NPCCSS endpoint, with the result that the primary endpoint is permitted to be recalculated using the 4- domain NPCCSS, subject to the submission of additional requested information which Orphazyme intends to provide. The FDA also affirmed that it would require additional in vivo or pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Orphazyme is planning to request a Type C Meeting with the FDA in the second quarter of 2022 to discuss its progress in redressing the deficiencies identified in the CRL and plans for resubmission. Subject to FDA’s feedback in the Type C meeting and any other pertinent discussions with the regulatory body, Orphazyme plans to resubmit the NDA for arimoclomol in the second half of 2022. However, there are a number of uncertainties inherent in clinical development, regulatory affairs, marketinginvestigation that may hinder Orphazyme’s plans for generating additional data, meeting with FDA, and/or resubmitting the NDA. And, even if Orphazyme properly implements FDA’s feedback and sales.resubmits the NDA with the additional confirmatory evidence and qualitative and quantitative data that FDA requested, there is no guarantee that FDA will approve the resubmitted version of the NDA.

20
If,

Orphazyme has also submitted a MAA with the EMA. In February 2022, Orphazyme announced that they were notified by the CHMP of a negative trend vote on the MAA for any reason, NantCell doesarimoclomol in NPC following an oral explanation. The trend vote indicates that the CHMP’s current orientation is to not devote sufficient timeapprove arimoclomol when it convenes by the end of March 2022. Orphazyme considers it unlikely that this position will change before the formal vote is undertaken in March 2022. They will assess their strategic options and resourcesprovide an update to the development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin, we will not realizemarket at the potential commercial benefits of the arrangement, and our results of operations will be adversely affected. In addition, if NantCell were to breach or terminate its arrangement with us, the development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin could be delayed, curtailed or terminated, and we may not have sufficient financial resources or capabilities to continue development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin on our own.

Under our agreement with NantCell, they may opt out of a project by giving us twelve months' prior written notice. If NantCell were to exercise its right to opt out of a program or to terminate the licensing agreement, the development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin would be adversely affected, our potential for generating revenue from this program would be adversely affected and attracting new partners would be made more difficult.
Much of theapplicable time

The potential revenue from our existing and future arrangement with NantCell will consist ofOrphazyme is based on contingent payments, such as payments for achieving development and commercialization milestones and royalties payable on commercial sales of successfully developed aldoxorubicin.  The milestone, royalty and other revenue that we may receive under this arrangementwhich will depend upon our, and NantCell'sOrphazyme’s ability to achieve regulatory approvals and successfully develop, introduce, market and sell aldoxorubicin.products derived from arimoclomol. Our ability to realize the maximum amount of aggregate milestone payments initially set forth in our agreement with Orphazyme has been reduced by approximately $20 million due to Orphazyme’s unsuccessful pivotal studies of arimoclomol for ALS and IBM and subsequent decision to cease arimoclomol’s development with regard such indications. While Orphazyme has progressed further in connection with its development of arimoclomol for NPC (than for ALS or IBM), its efforts to obtain the FDA and EMA approvals needed to lawfully market arimoclomol for NPC in the United States and the EU, respectively, have been unsuccessful thus far and may never succeed. We will not be directly involved in this process and will depend entirely on NantCell,Orphazyme, which may fail to develop or effectively commercialize aldoxorubicin becauseproducts derived from arimoclomol for many reasons, including if they:

·decide not to devote the necessary resources due to internal constraints, such as limited personnel with the requisite scientific expertise, limited cash resources or specialized equipment limitations, or the belief that other drug development programs may have a higher likelihood of obtaining regulatory approval or may potentially generate a greater return on investment;
do not have sufficient resources necessary to carry arimoclomol through clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization;
cannot obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for arimoclomol; or
decide to pursue a competitive drug candidate.

If Orphazyme does not obtain the regulatory approvals for arimoclomol that are necessary to trigger the corresponding milestone payments to us under our agreement, or if their research and development or commercialization efforts are, otherwise, unsuccessful, we will not realize the anticipated commercial benefits of the arrangement and our business prospects will be materially and adversely affected.

If ImmunityBio fails to successfully develop aldoxorubicin or our exclusive licensing arrangement with ImmunityBio is otherwise unsuccessful, our business prospects will be materially and adversely affected.

In July 2017, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with ImmunityBio to complete the clinical development of and commercialization of aldoxorubicin. Under this agreement, ImmunityBio has committed to provide substantial funding, as well as significant capabilities in clinical development, regulatory affairs, marketing and sales.

If, for any reason, ImmunityBio does not devote sufficient time and resources to the development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin, we will not realize the potential commercial benefits of the arrangement, and our results of operations will be adversely affected. In addition, if ImmunityBio were to breach or terminate its arrangement with us, the development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin could be delayed, curtailed or terminated, and we may not have sufficient financial resources or capabilities to continue development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin on our own.

Under our agreement with ImmunityBio, they may opt out of a project by giving us twelve months’ prior written notice. If ImmunityBio were to exercise its right to opt out of a program or to terminate the licensing agreement, the development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin would be adversely affected, our potential for generating revenue from this program would be adversely affected and attracting new partners would be made more difficult.

21
·

Much of the potential revenue from our existing and future arrangement with ImmunityBio will consist of contingent payments, such as payments for achieving development and commercialization milestones and single- and double-digit royalties payable on commercial sales of successfully developed aldoxorubicin. The milestone, royalty and other revenue that we may receive under this arrangement will depend upon our, and ImmunityBio’s ability to successfully develop, introduce, market, commercialize and sell aldoxorubicin. We will not be directly involved in this process and will depend entirely on ImmunityBio, which may fail to develop or effectively commercialize aldoxorubicin for many reasons including if they:

decide not to devote the necessary resources due to internal constraints, such as limited personnel with the requisite scientific expertise, limited cash resources or specialized equipment limitations, or the belief that other drug development programs may have a higher likelihood of obtaining regulatory approval or may potentially generate a greater return on investment;
do not have sufficient resources necessary to carry aldoxorubicin through clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization;
·
cannot obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for aldoxorubicin; or
·
decide to pursue a competitive drug candidate.

If NantCellImmunityBio fails to develop or effectively commercialize aldoxorubicin or for any of the other reasons described above, we may not be able to develop and commercialize that drug independently or replace NantCellImmunityBio with another suitable partner in a reasonable period of time and on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #11#

Risks Associated With Drug Discovery and Development

If we do not achieve ourthe projected development goals for our product candidates are not achieved in the expected time frames, we estimate, the commercialization of our products may be delayed and our business prospects may suffer. Our financial projections also may prove to be materially inaccurate.

From time to time, we estimate the timing of the accomplishment of various scientific, clinical, regulatory and other product development goals, which we sometimes refer to as milestones. These milestones may include the commencement or completion of scientific studies and clinical trials and the submission of regulatory filings.

We also may disclose projected expenditures or other forecasts for future periods. These and other financial projections are based on management'smanagement’s current expectations and do not contain any margin of error or cushion for any specific uncertainties, or for the uncertainties inherent in all financial forecasting.

The actual timing of milestones and actual expenditures or other financial results can vary dramatically compared to our estimates, in some cases for reasons beyond our control.control or the control of companies that have licensed or purchased our product candidates. If we do not meetthese milestones or financial projections as announced from time to time,are not met, the development and commercialization of our productsproduct candidates may be delayed and our business prospects may suffer. The assumptions management has used to produce these projections may significantly change or prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on any of these financial projections.

The regulatory approval process is lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if our products or those we have sold or licensed are not successfully developed and approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, we may be forced to reduce or curtail our operations.

All of our product candidates in development or those licensed or sold must be approved by the FDA or corresponding foreign governmental agencies before they can be marketed. The process for obtaining FDA and foreign government approvals is both time-consuming and costly, with no certainty of a successful outcome. This process typically includes the conduct of extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing, including post-approval testing, which may take longer or cost more than we or our licensees, if any, anticipate, and may prove unsuccessful due to numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate'scandidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. WeNone of our product candidates in development or licensed or sold to third parties have not obtainedreceived regulatory approval for any product candidate.approval.

22

Numerous factors could affect the timing, cost or outcome of our product development efforts, including the following:

·difficulty in enrolling patients in conformity with required protocols or projected timelines;
·
requirements for clinical trial design imposed by the FDA;
·
unexpected adverse reactions by patients in trials;
·
difficulty in obtaining clinical supplies of the product;
·
changes in or our inability to comply with FDA or foreign governmental product testing, manufacturing or marketing requirements;
·
regulatory inspections of clinical trials or manufacturing facilities, which may, among other things, require us or our manufacturers or licensees to undertake corrective action or suspend or terminate the affected clinical trials if investigators find them not to be in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements;
·
inability to generate statistically significant data confirming the safety and efficacy of the product being tested;
·
modification of the product during testing; and
·
reallocation of our limited financial and other resources to other clinical programs.

It is possible that none of the product candidates we develop or have sold or licensed will obtain the regulatory approvals necessary for us to begin selling them.them or making us eligible to receive milestone or royalty payments. The time required to obtain FDA and foreign governmental approvals is unpredictable, but often can take years following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the complexity of the product candidate. Any analysis we performperformed on data from clinical activities is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, even if we were to obtainregulatory approval was obtained, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request,requested, may not approve the intended price we intend to charge for oursuch products, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for ourthe product candidates.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #12#

candidates that we develop, have sold or licensed.

Furthermore, even if we obtain regulatory approvals are obtained, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, import, export, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs, and good clinical practices, or cGCPs, for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

·restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, withdrawal of the product from the market, or voluntary or mandatory product recalls;
·
fines, warning letters or holds on clinical trials;
·
refusal by the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us or our strategic partners, or suspension or revocation of product license approvals;
·
product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; and
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

23

The FDA'sFDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business. We will also be subject to periodic inspections and the potential for mandatory post- approval clinical trials required by the FDA and other U.S. and foreign regulatory authorities. Any delay or failure in obtaining required approvals or to comply with post-approval regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue from the particular product candidate. The failure to comply with any post-approval regulatory requirements also could result in the rescission of the related regulatory approvals or the suspension of sales of the offending product.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results.

Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. For example, aldoxorubicin has shown encouraging preliminary clinical results in our Phase 2b clinical trial as a treatment for STS; however, theseSTS. These conclusions may not be reproduced in future clinical trial results; forresults. For instance, the Phase 3 pivotal clinical trial testing aldoxorubicin as a treatment for STS narrowly missed statistical significance although it demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS over investigator'sinvestigator’s choice in 312 patients treated in North America plus Australia .and Australia. Accordingly, our development partner may ultimately be unable to provide the FDA and/or other U.S. and foreign regulatory authorities with satisfactory data on clinical safety and efficacy sufficient to obtain approval from the FDA approval of aldoxorubicin for any indication.

Further wedelays may experience delaysoccur in clinical trials of our product candidates. We do not know whether ongoing clinical trials will be completed on schedule or at all, or whether planned clinical trials will begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll patients on time or be completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including delays related to:

·obtaining regulatory approval to commence a trial;
·
reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and clinical trial sites;
·
obtaining institutional review board approval at each clinical trial site;
·
recruiting suitable patients to participate in a trial;
·
having patients complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;
·
clinical trial sites deviating from trial protocol or dropping out of a trial;
·
adding new clinical trial sites; or
·
manufacturing sufficient quantities of product candidate for use in clinical trials.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #13#

Our SPA with the FDA for our pivotal study of aldoxorubicin does not guarantee marketing approval in the U.S.
We have an SPA with the FDA for the pivotal trial of aldoxorubicin for the treatment of STS. The SPA means that the FDA agrees that the design and analyses proposed in a protocol are acceptable to support regulatory approval of the product candidate with respect to effectiveness of the indication studied. However, an SPA agreement does not guarantee approval of a product candidate, and even if the FDA agrees to the design, execution, and analysis proposed in protocols reviewed under the SPA process, the FDA may revoke or alter its agreement in certain circumstances. In particular, an SPA agreement is not binding on the FDA if public health concerns emerge that were unrecognized at the time of the SPA agreement, other new scientific concerns regarding product safety or efficacy arise, the sponsor fails to comply with the agreed upon trial protocols, or the relevant data, assumptions or information provided by the sponsor in a request for the SPA change or are found to be false or omit relevant facts. In addition, even after an SPA agreement is finalized, the SPA agreement may be modified, and such modification will be deemed binding on the FDA review division, except under the circumstances described above, if the FDA and the sponsor agree in writing to modify the protocol and such modification is intended to improve the study. The FDA retains significant latitude and discretion in interpreting the terms of the SPA agreement and the data and results from any study that is the subject of the SPA agreement. Moreover, a final determination that the agreed-upon protocol satisfies a specific objective, such as the demonstration of efficacy and safety (positive benefit-risk ratio), or supports an approval decision, will be based on a complete review of all the data submitted to the FDA.
We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we and our collaborators may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates and our business could be substantially harmed.
We have agreements with third-party CROs to monitor and manage data for our preclinical and clinical programs. We rely heavily on these parties for execution of our preclinical and clinical trials, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our CROs are required to comply with cGCPs, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for products in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these cGCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we or any of these CROs fails to comply with applicable cGCP regulations, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that, upon inspection, such regulatory authorities will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with the cGCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations, and will require a large number of test subjects. Our or our CROs' failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, our CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such CROs, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our financial results and the commercial prospects for aldoxorubicin would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.
Switching or adding additional CROs involves substantial cost and requires extensive management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects

We rely upon third parties for the manufacture of our clinical product supplies, and we intend to rely on third parties to produce commercial supplies of any approved product candidate, and our commercialization of any product candidates could be stopped, delayed or made less profitable if those third parties fail to obtain approval of the FDA, fail to provide us with sufficient quantities of drug product or fail to do so at acceptable quality levels or prices.
We do not have the facilities or expertise to manufacture any of our other product candidates, and we lack the resources and capability to manufacture any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale. Accordingly, we are dependent upon third-party manufacturers, or potential future strategic alliance partners, to manufacture these supplies. Our failure to secure arrangements as needed could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to complete the development of our future products or to commercialize them.
The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections that will be completed after we submit our NDA to the FDA. We do not control the manufacturing process of aldoxorubicin and are completely dependent on our contract manufacturing partners for compliance with the FDA's requirements for manufacture of aldoxorubicin. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the FDA's strict regulatory requirements, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain FDA approval for the manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #14#

We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively.

We will be able to protect our technologies from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that we have rights to valid and enforceable patents or other proprietary rights that cover them. Although we have rights to patents and patent applications directed to our product candidates, these patents and applications may not prevent third parties from developing or commercializing similar or identical technologies. In addition, our patents may be held to be invalid if challenged by third parties, and our patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents.

24

The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents has emerged to date in the United States and in many foreign countries. The application and enforcement of patent laws and regulations in foreign countries is even more uncertain. Accordingly, we may not be able to effectively file, protect or defend our proprietary rights on a consistent basis. Many of the patents and patent applications on which we rely were issued or filed by third parties prior to the time we acquired rights to them. The validity, enforceability and ownership of those patents and patent applications may be challenged, and if a court decides that our patents are not valid, we will not have the right to stop others from using our inventions. There is also the risk that, even if the validity of our patents is upheld, a court may refuse to stop others on the ground that their activities do not infringe our patents.

Any litigation brought by us to protect our intellectual property rights could be costly and have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition, make it more difficult for us to enter into strategic alliances with third parties to develop our products, or discourage our existing licensees from continuing their development work on our potential products. If our patent coverage is insufficient to prevent third parties from developing or commercializing similar or identical technologies, the value of our assets is likely to be materially and adversely affected.

We also rely on certain proprietary trade secrets and know-how, especially where we believe patent protection is not appropriate or obtainable. However, tradeTrade secrets and know-how are difficult to protect. Although we have taken measures to protect our unpatented trade secrets and know-how, including the use of confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and some of our contractors, it is possible that these persons may disclose our trade secrets or know-how or that our competitors may independently develop or otherwise discover our trade secrets and know-how.


If our product candidates infringe the rights of others, we could be subject to expensive litigation or be required to obtain licenses from others to develop or market them.

Our competitors or others may have patent rights that they choose to assert against us or our licensees, suppliers, customers or potential collaborators. Moreover, we may not know about patents or patent applications that our products would infringe. For example, because patent applications do not publish for at least 18 months, if at all, and can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications unknown to us that may later result in issued patents that our product candidates would infringe. In addition, if third parties file patent applications or obtain patents claiming technology also claimed by us or our licensors in issued patents or pending applications, we may have to participate in interference proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention. If third parties file oppositions in foreign countries, we may also have to participate in opposition proceedings in foreign tribunals to defend the patentability of our foreign patent applications.

If a third-party claims that we are infringing on its proprietary rights, any of the following may occur:

·we may become involved in time-consuming and expensive litigation, even if the claim is without merit;
·
we may become liable for substantial damages for past infringement if a court decides that our technology infringes a competitor'scompetitor’s patent;
·
a court may prohibit us from selling or licensing our product without a license from the patent holder, which may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all, or which may require us to pay substantial royalties or grant cross licenses to our patents; and
·
we may have to redesign our product candidates or technology so that it does not infringe patent rights of others, which may not be possible or commercially feasible.

If any of these events occurs, our business and prospects will suffer and the market price of our common stock will likely decline substantially.

25

The results of pre-clinical studies or early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and our ultra-high potency albumin-binding drug conjugates may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.

Success in pre-clinical studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate adequate data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of our ultra-high potency albumin-binding drug conjugates. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including those with greater resources and experience than we have, have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after seeing promising results in earlier clinical trials. Despite the results reported in earlier preclinical trials for our ultra-high potency albumin-binding drug conjugates, weWe do not know whether the clinical trials we may conduct will demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety to result in regulatory approval to market them in any particular jurisdiction. If our clinical trials do not produce favorable results, our ability to achieve regulatory approval for these drug candidates will be adversely impacted and the value of our stock may decline.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #15#

The successful commercialization of our product candidates that are approved for marketing in the United States, if any, and/or any other products that we or our partners may commercialize in the future will likely depend, in-part, on the coverage and reimbursement policies of third-party payors, which, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The commercial success of our product candidates that are approved for marketing in the United States, if any, as well as any other products that we may or our partners may commercialize in the future, may depend, in significant part, on the extent to such products will be covered and reimbursed by third-party payors, including government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurers, and managed care organizations. Patients for whom prescription drugs are prescribed and prescribing practitioners generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Without adequate coverage and reimbursement, patients and providers are unlikely to use or prescribe any products that we or our partners may commercialize or from which we may, otherwise, generate revenue in connection with commercial sales.

There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, there is no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement. Accordingly, third-party payors, including private insurers and governmental payors, such as Medicare and Medicaid, play an important role in determining the extent to which new drugs and biologics will be covered and reimbursed. The Medicare program covers certain individuals aged 65 or older, as well as certain people under 65 with disabilities and individuals suffering from end-stage renal disease. The Medicaid program, which varies from state-to-state, covers eligible individuals and families who have limited financial means. The Medicare and Medicaid programs are increasingly used as models for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies for drugs and biologics. It is difficult to predict at this time what third-party payors will decide with respect to the coverage and reimbursement for our product candidates and any other products we or our partners may commercialize or to which we may have commercialization rights or interests.

Third-party payors may deny coverage or reimbursement if they determine that a medical product was not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods, as determined by the third-party payor, and most, if not all, payors will deny coverage for products used or administered for an unapproved indication. Third-party payors also typically refuse to cover and reimburse for experimental procedures and devices. Furthermore, third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. And, the U.S. government and state legislatures have shown significant interest in implementing healthcare cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement, discount and rebate requirements, and requirements for substitution of generic products. Such measures, and the enactment of any more restrictive updates thereto and/or new measures could further limit our potential profitability and commercial success in connection with any products we or our partners may market in the United States. We cannot predict whether, or the extent to which, government and/or private payors will cover any products we or our partners may commercialize in the future, and there can be no assurances that such coverage and reimbursement levels, as applicable, will be sufficient to allow us to profit from the commercial sale of such product(s) in light of our costs from development and other related activities and any current or future arrangements with our development and/or commercialization partners.

Any products that we develop or are sold or licensed may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations and/or third-party coverage and reimbursement policies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We intend

Our product candidates are intended to sell our products that may be approved for marketingmarketed primarily to hospitals, which generally receive reimbursement for the health care services they provide to their patients from third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid and other domestic and international government programs, private insurance plans and managed care programs.

26
We currently expect that any

Such drugs we develop maywill likely need to be administered under the supervision of a physician. Under currently applicable law, drugs that are not usually self-administered may be eligible for coverage by the Medicare program if:

·they are "incidental"“incidental” to a physician'sphysician’s services;
·
they are "reasonable“reasonable and necessary"necessary” for the diagnosis or treatment of the illness or injury for which they are administered according to accepted standard of medical practice;
·
they are not excluded as immunizations; and
·
they have been approved by the FDA.

There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, third-party payors, including private and governmental payors, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs, play an important role in determining the extent to which new drugs and biologics will be covered and reimbursed. The Medicare program covers certain individuals aged 65 or older, disabled or suffering from end-stage renal disease. The Medicaid program, which varies from state-to-state, covers certain individuals and families who have limited financial means. The Medicare and Medicaid programs increasingly are used as models for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies for drugs and biologics. It is difficult to predict at this time what third-party payors will decide with respect to the coverage and reimbursement for our product candidates.

Most third-party payors may deny coverage or reimbursement if they determine that a medical product was not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods, as determined by the third-party payor, or was used for an unapproved indication. Third-party payors also may refuse to cover and reimburse for experimental procedures and devices. Furthermore, because our programs are in the early stages of development, we are unable at this time to determine their cost-effectiveness and the level or method of reimbursement. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices, and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. If the price we are able to charge for any products we develop is inadequate in light of our development and other costs, our profitability could be adversely affected.

Healthcare legislative reform measures could hinder or prevent the commercial success of our products and product candidates.

In the United States, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future revenues and profitability. Federal and state lawmakers regularly propose and, at times, enact legislation that results in significant changes to the healthcare system, some of which are intended to contain or reduce the costs of medical products and services. For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the Affordable Care Act,“Healthcare Reform Law,” became law in the United StatesStates. It contains a number of provisions regarding health insurance, the provision of healthcare, conditions to reimbursement for healthcare services provided to Medicare and Medicaid patients, and other healthcare policy reforms. Through the law-making process, substantial changes have been and continue to be made to the current system for paying for healthcare in the United States, including changes made to extend medical benefits to certain Americans who lacked insurance coverage and to contain or reduce healthcare costs (such as by reducing or conditioning reimbursement amounts for healthcare services and drugs, and imposing additional taxes, fees, and rebate obligations on pharmaceutical and medical device companies). This legislation was one of the most comprehensive and significant reforms ever experienced by the United States in the healthcare industry and has significantly changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. This legislation has impacted the scope of healthcare insurance and incentives for consumers and insurance companies, among others. Additionally, the Healthcare Reform Law’s provisions were designed to encourage providers to find cost savings in their clinical operations. Pharmaceuticals represent a significant portion of the cost of providing care. This environment has caused changes in the purchasing habits of consumers and providers and resulted in specific attention to the pricing negotiation, product selection and utilization review surrounding pharmaceuticals. This attention may result in any products we may commercialize or promote in the future, and/or our therapeutic candidates, as applicable, being chosen less frequently or subject to substantially lowered pricing.

These structural changes could entail further modifications to the existing system of private payors and government programs (such as Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program), creation of government-sponsored healthcare insurance sources, or some combination of both, as well as other changes. Restructuring the coverage of medical care in the U.S. could impact the reimbursement for prescribed drugs and pharmaceuticals, including our current commercial products, those we and our development or commercialization partners are currently developing or those that we may commercialize or promote in the future. If reimbursement for the products we currently commercialize or promote, any product we may commercialize or promote, or approved therapeutic candidates is substantially reduced or otherwise adversely affected in the future, or rebate obligations associated with them are substantially increased, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

27

Further, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which drug manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which have resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted bills designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to prescription drug pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products. In addition, the United States government, state legislatures, and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing drug cost containment programs, including price-controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs to limit the growth of government paid health care costs. For example, the United States government has passed legislation requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide rebates and discounts to certain entities and governmental payors to participate in federal healthcare programs. Further, Congress and the current administration have each indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs, and the current administration recently released a “Blueprint”, or plan, to reduce the cost of drugs. The current administration’s Blueprint contains certain measures that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is already working to implement. Individual states in the United States have also been increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

We anticipate there will continue to be proposals by legislators at both the federal and state levels, regulators and commercial payers to reduce prescription drug costs while expanding individual healthcare benefits. Additional changes that may affect our business include those governing enrollmentsenrollment in federal healthcare programs, reimbursement changes, and fraud and abuse measures, all of which will impact existing government healthcare programsenforcement, and will result in the developmentexpansion of new programs. programs, such as Medicare payment for performance initiatives. The Affordable Care Act, among other things, (i) increasesultimate implementation of any healthcare reform legislation and any new laws and regulations, and its impact on us, is impossible to predict. Any significant reforms made to the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, extends the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations, and addresses new methodologies by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, and for drugs that are line extension products; (ii) establishes annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs, and (iii) enacts a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer's outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adoptedhealthcare system in the United States, since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. On August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 amongor in other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation's automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers up to 2% per fiscal year, which went intojurisdictions, may have an adverse effect on April 1, 2013. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Actour business, financial condition, results of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centersoperations and cancer treatment centers. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our products once approved or additional pricing pressures.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #16#


prospects.

We may also be subject to federal and state healthcare laws regulation and enforcementregulations relating to our current and/or future operations, and our failure to comply with those laws could adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition.

If we obtain FDA approval for any of our product candidates and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our operations may be directly, or indirectly through our customers, subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, and physician sunshine laws and regulations. These laws may impact, among other things, our proposed sales, marketing, and education programs. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include:

·the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, any person from knowingly and willfully offering, soliciting, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce either the referral of an individual, for an item or service or the purchasing or ordering of a good or service, for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
·
the federal False Claims Act, which prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false claims, or knowingly using false statements, to obtain payment from the federal government, and which may apply to entities that provide coding and billing advice to customers;
·
federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;
·
the federal physician sunshine requirements under the Affordable Care Act, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians, other healthcare providers, and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and other healthcare providers and their immediate family members;

28

·the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which governs the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information; and
·
state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry'sindustry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; and state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts. For instance, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or the CCPA, became effective on January 1, 2020. The CCPA gives California residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used by requiring covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers (as that term is broadly defined) and provide such consumers new ways to opt-out of certain sales of personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. Although there are limited exemptions for clinical trial data and the CCPA’s implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, the CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability. Many similar privacy laws have been proposed at the federal level and in other states.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. In addition, recent health care reform legislationthe federal government has strengthened these laws. For example,identified relationships between drug companies (and other medical-product manufacturers) and healthcare providers as particularly susceptible to fraud and abuse and, thus, our relationships may be subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny, particularly once we have one or more products on the recently enacted Affordable Care Act, among other things, amends the intent requirementU.S. market, if ever. Further, many of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statuteapplicable healthcare laws and criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person regulations are subject to varying and/or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the Affordable Care Act provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act.

evolving interpretations, which makes achieving and maintaining consistent compliance more difficult.

Achieving and sustaining compliance with these laws may prove costly. In addition, any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management'smanagement’s attention from the operation of our business. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, imprisonment, or the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

We will be required to pay substantial milestone and other payments relating to the commercialization of our products.

Aldoxorubicin

The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to aldoxorubicin provides for our payment of up to an aggregate of $7.5 million upon meeting specified clinical and regulatory milestones up to and including the product’s second, final marketing approval. We also will be obliged to pay:

commercially reasonable royalties based on a percentage of net sales (as defined in the agreement);
a percentage of any non-royalty sub-licensing income (as defined in the agreement); and
milestones of $1,000,000 for each additional final marketing approval that we might obtain.

Arimoclomol

The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to arimoclomol provides for our payment of up to an aggregate of $3.65 million upon receipt of milestone payments from Orphayzme A/S.

29

Innovive

Under the merger agreement by which we acquired Innovive, we agreed to pay the former Innovive stockholders a total of up to approximately $18.3 million of future earnout merger consideration, subject to our achievement of specified net sales under the Innovive license agreements. The earnout merger consideration, if any, will be payable in shares of our common stock, subject to specified conditions, or, at our election, in cash or by a combination of shares of our common stock and cash. Our common stock will be valued for purposes of any future earnout merger consideration based upon the trading price of our common stock at the time the earnout merger consideration is paid.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could adversely impact our business and prospects, including active and planned clinical trials by ImmunityBio and Orphazyme.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, was first identified in China and has surfaced in several regions across the world. In March 2020, the disease was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The COVID-19 pandemic has, from time to time, led to government-imposed quarantines, limitations on business activity and shelter-in-place mandates to mitigate or contain the virus, and has contributed to financial market volatility and uncertainty, significant disruptions in general commercial activity and the global economy.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, the companies which we are working to develop and commercialize our products, ImmunityBio and Orphazyme, could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which could cause delays in our potential timing of receipts of milestones and royalties within the disclosed time periods and expected costs. The disruptions to ImmunityBio and Orphazyme could include:

delays or difficulties in recruiting and enrolling new patients in their clinical trials;
delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site staff;
diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as their clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of their clinical trials;
interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others;
limitations in employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of their clinical trials, including because of sickness of employees or their families or the desire of employees to avoid contact with large groups of people;
interruption in global shipping that may affect the transport of clinical trial supplies and materials, such as investigational drug product used in their clinical trials;
delays in receiving approval from the FDA and local regulatory authorities to initiate their planned clinical trials;
changes in FDA and local regulation as part of a response to the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak which may change the ways in which clinical trials are conducted of discontinue clinical trials altogether;
delays in necessary interactions with regulators, ethics committees and other important agencies and contractors due to limitations in employee resources or forced furlough of government employees;
delay in the timing of other interactions with the FDA due to absenteeism by federal employees or by the diversion of their efforts and attention to approval of other therapeutics or other activities related to COVID-19; and
refusal of the FDA to accept data from clinical trials in affected geographies outside the United States.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may impact our business and prospects will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the duration of the pandemic, new variants of the coronavirus, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #17#
30

In the event of a dispute regarding our international drug development, it may be necessary for us to resolve the dispute in the foreign country of dispute, where we would be faced with unfamiliar laws and procedures.

The resolution of disputes in foreign countries can be costly and time consuming, similar to the situation in the United States. In a foreign country, we face the additional burden of understanding unfamiliar laws and procedures. We may not be entitled to a jury trial, as we might be in the United States. Further, to litigate in any foreign country, we would be faced with the necessity of hiring lawyers and other professionals who are familiar with the foreign laws. For these reasons, we may incur unforeseen expenses if we are forced to resolve a dispute in a foreign country.

Drug discovery is a complex, time-consuming and expensive process, and we may not succeed in creating new product candidates.

Conducting drug discovery and pre-clinical development of our albumin-binding technology is a complex and expensive process that will take many years. Accordingly, we cannot be sure whether or when our drug discovery and pre-clinical development activities will succeed in developing any new product candidates. In addition, any product candidates that we develop in pre-clinical testing may not demonstrate success in clinical trials required for marketing approval.

Any deficiency in the design, implementation or oversight of our drug discovery and pre-clinical testing programs could cause us to incur significant additional costs, experience significant delays, prevent us from obtaining marketing approval for any product candidate that may result from these programs or abandon development of certain product candidates. If any of these risks materializes, it could harm our business and cause our stock price to decline.

General Risk Factors

We are subject to intense competition, and we may not compete successfully.

Many companies, including large pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms with financial resources, research and development staffs, and facilities that may be substantially greater than those of ours or our strategic partners or licensees, are engaged in the research and development of pharmaceutical products that could compete with our potential products. To the extent that we seek to acquire, through license or otherwise, existing or potential new products, we will be competing with numerous other companies, many of which will have substantially greater financial resources and large acquisition and research and development staffs that may give those companies a competitive advantage over us in identifying and evaluating these drug acquisition opportunities. Any products that we acquire will be competing with products marketed by companies that in many cases will have substantially greater marketing resources than we have. The industry is characterized by rapid technological advances and competitors may develop their products more rapidly and such products may be more effective than those currently under development or that may be developed in the future by our strategic partners or licensees. Competitive products for a number of the disease indications that we have targeted are currently being marketed by other parties, and additional competitive products are under development and may also include products currently under development that we are not aware of or products that may be developed in the future.

As a result, these competitors may:

·

succeed in developing competitive products sooner than us or our strategic partners or licensees;

● obtain FDA or foreign governmental approvals for their products before we can obtain approval of any of our products;

● obtain patents that block or otherwise inhibit the development and commercialization of our product candidate candidates;

● develop products that are safer or more effective than our products;

● devote greater resources than us to marketing or selling products;

● introduce or adapt more quickly than us to new technologies and other scientific advances;

● introduce products that render our products obsolete;

● withstand price competition more successfully than us or our strategic partners or licensees;

● negotiate third-party strategic alliances or licensing arrangements more effectively than us; and

● take better advantage than us of other opportunities.

31
·obtain FDA or foreign governmental approvals for their products before we can obtain approval of any of our products;
·obtain patents that block or otherwise inhibit the development and commercialization of our product candidate candidates;
·develop products that are safer or more effective than our products;
·devote greater resources than us to marketing or selling products;
·introduce or adapt more quickly than us to new technologies and other scientific advances;
·introduce products that render our products obsolete;
·withstand price competition more successfully than us or our strategic partners or licensees;
·negotiate third-party strategic alliances or licensing arrangements more effectively than us; and
·take better advantage than us of other opportunities.
We will be required to pay substantial milestone and other payments relating to the commercialization of our products.
The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to aldoxorubicin provides for our payment of up to an aggregate of $7.5 million upon meeting specified clinical and regulatory milestones up to and including the product's second, final marketing approval. We also will be obliged to pay:
·commercially reasonable royalties based on a percentage of net sales (as defined in the agreement);
·a percentage of any non-royalty sub-licensing income (as defined in the agreement); and
·milestones of $1,000,000 for each additional final marketing approval that we might obtain.
Under the merger agreement by which we acquired Innovive, we agreed to pay the former Innovive stockholders a total of up to approximately $18.3 million of future earnout merger consideration, subject to our achievement of specified net sales under the Innovive license agreements. The earnout merger consideration, if any, will be payable in shares of our common stock, subject to specified conditions, or, at our election, in cash or by a combination of shares of our common stock and cash. Our common stock will be valued for purposes of any future earnout merger consideration based upon the trading price of our common stock at the time the earnout merger consideration is paid.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #18#

We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively.
We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively. We maintain sensitive data pertaining to our Company on our computer networks, including information about our development activities, our intellectual property and other proprietary business information. Our internal computer systems and those of third parties with which we contract may be vulnerable to damage from cyber-attacks, computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, despite the implementation of security measures. System failures, accidents or security breaches could cause interruptions to our operations, including material disruption of our development activities, result in significant data losses or theft of our intellectual property or proprietary business information, and could require substantial expenditures to remedy. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our development programs could be delayed, any of which would harm our business and operations.

We are subject to potential liabilities from clinical testing and future product liability claims.

If any of our products are alleged to be defective, they may expose us to claims for personal injury by patients in clinical trials of our products or, if we obtain marketing approval and commercialize our products, by patients using our commercially marketed products. Even if one or more of our products is approved by the FDA, users may claim that such products caused unintended adverse effects. We maintain clinical trial insurance for our ongoing clinical trials, and we plan to seek to obtain similar insurance for any other clinical trials that we conduct. We also would seek to obtain product liability insurance covering the commercial marketing of our product candidates. We may not be able to obtain additional insurance, however, and any insurance obtained by us may prove inadequate in the event of a claim against us. Any claims asserted against us also may divert management'smanagement’s attention from our operations, and we may have to incur substantial costs to defend such claims even if they are unsuccessful.

We may be unable to successfully acquire additional technologies or products. If we require additional technologies or products, our product development plans may change and the ownership interests of our shareholders could be diluted.

We may seek to acquire additional technologies by licensing or purchasing such technologies, or through a merger or acquisition of one or more companies that own such technologies. We have no current understanding or agreement to acquire any technologies, however, and we may not be able to identify or successfully acquire any additional technologies. We also may seek to acquire products from third parties that already are being marketed or have been approved for marketing, although we have not currently identified any of these products. We do not have any prior experience in acquiring or marketing products approved for marketing and may need to find third parties to market any products that we might acquire.

We have focused our product development efforts on our oncology and neurodegenerative drug candidates, which we believe have the greatest revenue potential. If we acquire additional technologies or product candidates, we may determine to make further changes to our product development plans and business strategy to capitalize on opportunities presented by the new technologies and product candidates.

We may determine to issue shares of our common stock to acquire additional technologies or products or in connection with a merger or acquisition of another company. To the extent we do so, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be diluted accordingly.

The impact and results of our exploration of any strategic alternatives are uncertain and may not be successful.

From time to time, we may consider strategic alternatives available to us to enhance shareholder value. Strategic alternatives could include acquisition transactions and/or strategic partnerships with one or more parties, the licensing of some of our proprietary technologies, or other possible transactions. Any strategic transaction that is completed ultimately may not deliver the anticipated benefits or enhance shareholder value. Further, we may devote a significant amount of our management resources to such a transaction, which could negatively impact our operations. We may incur significant costs in connection with seeking certain acquisitions or other strategic opportunities regardless of whether the transaction is completed, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources. In the event that we consummate an acquisition or strategic alternative in the future, there is no assurance that we would fully realize the potential benefits of such a transaction. Integration may be difficult and unpredictable, and acquisition-related integration costs, including certain non-recurring charges, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. Moreover, integrating assets and businesses may significantly burden management and internal resources, including the potential loss or unavailability of key personnel. If we fail to successfully integrate any assets and businesses we acquire, we may not fully realize the potential benefits we expect, and our operating results could be adversely affected. If we pay for an acquisition in cash, it would reduce our cash available for operations or cause us to incur additional debt, and if we pay with our stock it could be dilutive to our stockholders.

We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively.

We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively. We maintain sensitive data pertaining to our Company on our computer networks, including information about our development activities, our intellectual property and other proprietary business information. Our internal computer systems and those of third parties with which we contract may be vulnerable to damage from cyber-attacks, computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, despite the implementation of security measures. System failures, accidents or security breaches could cause interruptions to our operations, including material disruption of our development activities, result in significant data losses or theft of our intellectual property or proprietary business information, and could require substantial expenditures to remedy. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our development programs could be delayed, any of which would harm our business and operations.

32
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #19#

In

Our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.

Natural disasters could severely disrupt our operations or the operations of manufacturing facilities and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as manufacturing facilities, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place currently are limited and may not prove adequate in the event of a dispute regardingserious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our international drug development,disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Global, market and economic conditions may negatively impact our business, financial condition and share price.

Concerns over inflation, geopolitical issues, the U.S. financial markets, foreign exchange rates, capital and exchange controls, unstable global credit markets and financial conditions and the COVID-19 pandemic, have led to periods of significant economic instability, declines in consumer confidence and discretionary spending, diminished expectations for the global economy and expectations of slower global economic growth going forward, and increased unemployment rates. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturns, volatile business environments and continued unstable or unpredictable economic and market conditions. If these conditions continue to deteriorate or do not improve, it may bemake any necessary for usdebt or equity financing more difficult to resolve the dispute in the foreign country of dispute, where we would be faced with unfamiliar laws and procedures.

The resolution of disputes in foreign countries can becomplete, more costly, and time consuming, similar to the situation in the United States. However, inmore dilutive. In addition, there is a foreign country, we face the additional burdenrisk that one or more of understanding unfamiliar laws and procedures. We may not be entitled to a jury trial, as we might be in the United States. Further, to litigate in any foreign country, we would be faced with the necessity of hiring lawyersour current or future service providers and other professionals who are familiar with the foreign laws. For these reasons, we may incur unforeseen expenses if we are forcedpartners could be negatively affected by difficult economic times, which could adversely affect our ability to resolve a dispute in a foreign country.
Drug discovery is a complex, time-consumingattain our operating goals on schedule and expensive process, and we may not succeed in creating new product candidates.
Conducting drug discovery and pre-clinical development of our albumin-binding technology is a complex and expensive process that will take many years.  Accordingly, we cannot be sure whetheron budget or when our drug discovery and pre-clinical development activities will succeed in developing any new product candidates.  In addition, any product candidates that we develop in pre-clinical testing may not demonstrate success in clinical trials required for marketing approval.
Any deficiency in the design, implementation or oversight of our drug discovery and pre-clinical testing programs could cause us to incur significant additional costs, experience significant delays, prevent us from obtaining marketing approval for any product candidate that may result from these programs or abandon development of certain product candidates.  If any of these risks materializes, it could harmmeet our business and causefinancial objectives.

In addition, we face several risks associated with international business and are subject to global events beyond our stock price to decline.

Wecontrol, including war, public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics, trade disputes, economic sanctions, trade wars and their collateral impacts and other international events. Any of these changes could have a limited operating history in drug discovery, which is inherently risky, and wematerial adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations. There may not succeed in addressing these risks.
We have operatedbe changes to our drug discovery laboratory and LADR™ development program since October 2014. Accordingly, we have a limited operating history in conducting our own drug discovery programs. Consequently,business if there is limited information for investorsinstability, disruption or destruction in a significant geographic region, regardless of cause, including war, terrorism, riot, civil insurrection or social unrest; and natural or man-made disasters, including famine, flood, fire, earthquake, storm or disease. In February 2022, armed conflict escalated between Russia and Ukraine. The sanctions announced by the United States and other countries, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine against Russia to use as basis for assessingdate include restrictions on selling or importing goods, services or technology in or from affected regions and travel bans and asset freezes impacting connected individuals and political, military, business and financial organizations in Russia. The United States and other countries could impose wider sanctions and take other actions should the viabilityconflict further escalate. It is not possible to predict the broader consequences of our drug discovery efforts.  Investors must consider the risksthis conflict, which could include further sanctions, embargoes, regional instability, geopolitical shifts and difficulties inherent in drug discoveryadverse effects on macroeconomic conditions, currency exchange rates and pre-clinical activities, including the following:
·difficulties, complications, delays and other unanticipated factors in connection with the development of new drugs;
·competition from companies that have substantially greater assets and financial resources than we have;
·our ability to anticipate and adapt to a competitive market and rapid technological developments;
·our need to rely on multiple levels of complex financing agreements with outside funding due to the length of drug development cycles and governmental approved protocols associated with the pharmaceutical industry; and
·our dependence upon key scientific personnel, including Felix Kratz, Ph.D., our Vice President of Drug Discovery.
We cannot be certain that we will successfully address these risks or that our drug discovery efforts will be successful.  In the event that we do not successfully address these risks,financial markets, all of which could impact our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations couldoperations.]

We may not be materiallysuccessful in hiring and adversely affected.  We alsoretaining key employees, which may be required to reduce or discontinue altogetherharm our drug discoverybusiness.

Our business is highly dependent upon the continued services of our senior management and pre-clinical programs.

Ourkey personnel. As such, our future success depends on our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwardsidentify, attract, hire or engage, retain, and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an "ownership change," the corporation's ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwardsmotivate well-qualified personnel. Our operations require qualified personnel with expertise in pharmaceutical development and clinical research We must compete for qualified individuals with numerous companies, universities, and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research institutions. Competition for such individuals is intense, and, development tax credits)when the need arises, we may not be able to offset its post-change income and taxes mayhire the personnel necessary to support our efforts. There can be limited. In general, an "ownership change" occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by "5% shareholders"no assurance that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. As a result of a previous ownership change, our annual utilization of approximately $136.8 million in federal net operating loss carryforwardsthese professionals will be substantially limited.  Ifavailable in the market, or that we experience ownership changeswill be able to retain existing professionals or to meet or to continue to meet their compensation requirements.

An overall tightening and increasingly competitive labor market in the U.S. employment market generally, especially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has been recently observed in the United States. Sustained labor shortage or increased turnover rates within our employee base, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic or as a result of future transactions in our stock, we may be further limited ingeneral macroeconomic factors, could lead to increased costs, such as increased overtime to meet demand and increased wage rates to attract and retain employees, and could negatively affect our ability to useefficiently operate and our net operating loss carryforwardsoverall business. If we are unable to hire and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn. Any such limitations on the ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us on any net income thatretain employees capable of performing at a high-level, or if mitigation measures we may earntake to respond to a decrease in labor availability, such as third-party outsourcing have unintended negative effects, our business could be adversely affected. An overall labor shortage, lack of skilled labor, increased turnover or labor inflation, caused by the future.COVID-19 pandemic or as a result of general macroeconomic factors, could have a material adverse impact on our operations, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.]

33
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #20#

Risks Associated with Our Common Stock

You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings or other equity issuances.

To raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share that you may payhave paid for the sharesany of our common stock offered hereby.such securities that you currently hold. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share that you may payhave paid for thepreviously for shares of our common stock.


We To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities or obtaining borrowings convertible into equity, ownership dilution to existing stockholders may experience volatility in our stock price, whichresult and future investors may adversely affect the trading pricebe granted rights superior to those of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock in 2017 ranged from $1.65 to $6.00 per share, and it may continue to experience significant volatility from time to time. Factors that may affect the market price of our common stock include the following:
·announcements of interim or final results of our clinical trials or our drug discovery activities;
·announcements of regulatory developments or technological innovations by us or our competitors;
·changes in our relationship with our licensors and other strategic partners;
·our quarterly operating results;
·litigation involving or affecting us;
·shortfalls in our actual financial results compared to our guidance or the forecasts of stock market analysts;
·developments in patent or other technology ownership rights;
·acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or our competitors;
·public concern regarding the safety of our products; and
·government regulation of drug pricing.

existing stockholders.

Our outstanding options, and warrants, convertible preferred shares, preferred investment option and the availability for resale of the underlying shares may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had outstanding stock options to purchase 2,865,5122,827,829 shares of our common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $10.62$4.92 per share and outstanding warrants to purchase 3,980,7814,147 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $4.26$33.60 per share. OurIn addition, there are 8,240 preferred shares outstanding that can be converted into 9,336,637 shares of common stock, as well as preferred investment options and warrantsthat can be exercised for up to 11,363,637 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. These outstanding convertible instruments could adversely affect our ability to obtain future financing or engage in certain mergers or other transactions, since the holders of options and warrantsthese outstanding securities can be expected to exercise or convert them (as applicable) at a time when we may be able to obtain additional capital through a new offering of securities on terms more favorable to us than the terms of these outstanding options and warrants.convertible instruments. For the life of the options and warrants,these outstanding convertible instruments, the holders have the opportunity to profit from a rise in the market price of our common stock without assuming the risk of ownership. The issuance of shares upon the exercise or conversion (as applicable) of these outstanding options and warrantsconvertible instruments will also dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders. Many of our outstanding warrants contain anti-dilution provisions pertaining to dividends with respect to our common stock. In the event that these anti-dilution provisions are triggered by us in the future, we would likewise be required to reduce the exercise price or conversion price (as applicable), and increase the number of shares underlying those warrants,convertible instruments, which would have a dilutive effect on our stockholders.

We have registered with the SEC the resale by the holders of all or substantially allsome of the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion (as applicable) of our outstanding options and warrants.convertible instruments. The availability of these shares for public resale, as well as actual resales of these shares, could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #21#

We cannot assure investors that our internal controls will prevent future material weaknesses.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. We are required to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment needs to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting.

There can be no assurance that we will not suffer from material weaknesses in the future. If we fail to remediate these material weaknesses or fail to otherwise maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting in the future, such failure could result in a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and which could cause investors and other users to lose confidence in our consolidated financial statements, limit our ability to raise capital and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. Additionally, failure to remediate the material weaknesses or otherwise failing to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting may also negatively impact our operating results and financial condition, impair our ability to timely file our periodic and other reports with the SEC, subject us to additional litigation and regulatory actions and cause us to incur substantial additional costs in future periods relating to the implementation of remedial measures.

We are subject to legal actions that could adversely affect our financial condition.

From time to time, we aremay be involved in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Securities-related class action and derivative lawsuits have often been brought against companies, including many biotechnology companies, which experience volatility in the market price of their securities. This risk is especially relevant for biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies such as ours, which often experience significant stock price volatility in connection with their product development programs.

34
As described further in Item 3 of Part I of this Annual Report, our directors and certain of our officers are subject to stockholder derivative claims pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery and we and certain of our officers are subject to class-action complaints filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Although we carry director's and officer's and other liability insurance, we

We must pay the first legal fees and other litigation expenses incurred up to the application retention, or deductible, amounts under our insurance policies, including our director’s and officer’s and other liability insurance policies, and the insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of the liabilities that we may incur in connection with the pending or possible future legal actions. As a result, the pending legal proceedings and any future legal actions may adversely affect out financial condition.


Our anti-takeover measures may make it more difficult to change our management, or may discourage others from acquiring us, and thereby adversely affect stockholder value.

We have a stockholder rights plan and provisions in our restated by-laws, as amended, that are intended to protect our stockholders'stockholders’ interests by encouraging anyone seeking control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors. These provisions may discourage or prevent a person or group from acquiring us without the approval of our board of directors, even if the acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders.

We have a classified board of directors, which means that at least two stockholder meetings, instead of one, will be required to effect a change in the majority control of our board of directors. This applies to every election of directors, not just an election occurring after a change in control. The classification of our board increases the amount of time it takes to change majority control of our board of directors and may cause potential acquirers to lose interest in a potential purchase of us, regardless of whether our purchase would be beneficial to us or our stockholders. The additional time and cost to change a majority of the members of our board of directors makes it more difficult and may discourage our existing stockholders from seeking to change our existing management in order to change the strategic direction or operational performance of our company.

Our by-laws provide that directors may only be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our capital stock then entitled to vote at an election of directors. This provision prevents stockholders from removing any incumbent director without cause. Our by-laws also provide that a stockholder must give us at leastnot fewer than 120 days but not more than 150 days’ notice of a proposal or director nomination that such stockholder desires to present at any annual meeting or special meeting of our stockholders. Such provision prevents a stockholder from making a proposal or director nomination at a stockholder meeting without us having advance notice of that proposal or director nomination. This could make a change in control more difficult by providing our directors with more time to prepare an opposition to a proposed change in control. By making it more difficult to remove or install new directors, these bylawby-law provisions may also make our existing management less responsive to the views of our stockholders with respect to our operations and other issues such as management selection and management compensation.

We are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may also prevent or delay a takeover of us that may be beneficial to our stockholders.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #22#

Our restated by-laws, as amended, designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders'stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees.

Our by-laws provide that, unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) any action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to this provision of our by-laws. This choice-of-forum provision may limit our stockholders'stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our amended and restated by-laws inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

35

The Series C Certificate of Designation contains covenants that could limit our financing options and liquidity position, which would limit our ability to grow our business.

Covenants in the certificate of designation (the “Series C Certificate of Designation”) for our Preferred Stock (as defined below) impose operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions prohibit or limit our ability to, among other things:

pay cash dividends to our stockholders, subject to certain limited exceptions;
redeem or repurchase our common stock or other equity; or
issue any classes of stock senior to the Preferred Stock in right of dividends, redemption or distribution of assets upon certain liquidation events.

These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain additional financing, withstand downturns in our business or take advantage of business opportunities.

We may issue additional classes of preferred stock in the future, and the terms of the preferred stock may reduce the value of our common stock.

We are authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series. In the past, we have issued shares of preferred stock, including shares of our Preferred Stock issued in 2021. Our board of directors may determine the terms of future preferred stock offerings without further action by our stockholders. If we issue preferred stock, it could affect your rights or reduce the value of our outstanding common stock. In particular, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock may include voting rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights, sinking fund provisions, and restrictions on our ability to merge with or sell our assets to a third party.


We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock.

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock or other securities, and we currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Because we do not anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future, our stockholders will not realize a return on their investment in our common stock except to the extent of any appreciation in the value of our common stock. Our common stock may not appreciate in value, or it may decline in value.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research and development tax credits) to offset its post-change income and taxes may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5% shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. As a result of a previous ownership change, our annual utilization of approximately $67.6 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards became substantially limited. If we experience ownership changes as a result of future transactions in our stock, we may be further limited in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn. Any such limitations on the ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us on any net income that we may earn in the future.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

We lease our headquarters in Los Angeles, California. The lease covers approximately 5,7392,771 square feet of office and storage space and expires in February 2020.  Our monthly rent is $20,396, which is subject to annual increases.  In addition to the monthly rent, we are responsible for paying our allocable portion of operating expenses.  We have an option2024, with a right to extend the term of the lease for aan additional five-year period, and a right of first offer during the extended lease term to lease any available space on the sixth floor of the premises, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the lease agreement. Our monthly rent is $14,340, subject to an annual increase of 3.5 percent. We also lease additional storage space for approximately 540 square feet. This lease expires in February 2020,2024, and requires us to make monthly payments of $1,257,$1,405, subject to annual increases.

We lease laboratoryincreases of 2.5 percent. In March 2022, we entered into a sub-lease for our office space in Freiburg, Germany, covering approximately 752 square meters (8,094 square feet). Ourthat provides for a monthly rent is €10,070 (approximately $11,143), which isrental income of $8,867, subject to an annual increases. The amended lease expires on September 30, 2018, and we have an option to extend the termincrease of the lease for up to three additional three-year periods.3.5%.

36
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #23#

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are occasionally involved in legal proceedings and other matters arising from the normal course of business. As previously reported in our Quarterly Report filed with the SEC on November 7, 2017, the following actions are currently outstanding:

Shareholder Derivative Actions in Delaware.  There are two competing derivative complaints pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claims related to our alleged retention of DreamTeamGroup and MissionIR.  On December 14, 2015, a shareholder derivative complaint, captioned Niedermeyer et al. v. Kriegsman et al., C.A. No. 11800, was filed against certain of our officers and directors, for which a second amended complaint was filed on October 12, 2016.  On September 6, 2016, one of the plaintiffs in the California litigation (discussed above) effectively refiled his complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with the case captioned Taylor v. Kriegsman, C.A. No. 12720.   Following competing motions for appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, On February 22, 2017, the Court of Chancery appointed Niedermeyer et al.as lead plaintiffs in the complaint. On May 3, 2017, the parties entered into negotiations with a mediator and on June 2, 2017, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") to settle the entire action. On June 15, 2017, the MOU was submitted to the Court and the parties are now seeking Court approval. The Stipulation of Settlement was filed with the Court on January 22, 2018, which was preliminarily approved by the Court.  A final approval hearing is scheduled for April 19, 2018.  Any petition for an attorney fee award to the Plaintiff's counsel will also be considered by the Court at the April 19, 2018 hearing.
Class Action in California.  On July 25 and 29, 2016, nearly identical class action complaints31, 2021, we were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, titled Crihfield v. CytRx Corp., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-05519 and Dorce v. CytRx Corp., Case No. 2:16-cv-05666 alleging that we and certain of our officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by allegedly making materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failing to disclose material adverse facts to the effect that the clinical hold placed on the Phase 3 trial of aldoxorubicin for STS would prevent sufficient follow-up for patientsnot involved in the study, thus requiring further analysis, which could cause the trial's results and/or FDA approval to be materially adversely affected or delayed.  The plaintiffs allege that such wrongful acts and omissions caused significant losses and damages to a class of persons and entities that acquired our securities between November 18, 2014 and July 11, 2016, and seek an award of compensatory damages, costs and expenses, including counsel and expert fees, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On October 26, 2016, the Court entered an Order consolidating the actions titled In re: CytRx Corporation Securities Litigation, Master File No. 16 cv-05519-SJO and appointing a Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. Following the filing of a first amended complaint on January 13, 2017, on March 14, 2017 the Company and the individual defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss.  Plaintiff filed an Opposition thereto on April 28, 2017.  The Company and the individual defendants filed a Reply on May 30, 2017 and the matter was heard by the Court on June 12, 2017. On June 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint and the Individual Defendants filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff filed an Opposition thereto on July 24, 2017. The Company and the Individual Defendants filed a Reply on July 31, 2017. On August 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss. On September 18, 2017, the Court issued an Order setting a schedule for the case.  On January 30, 2018, the parties entered into negotiations with a mediator and on February 1, 2018, the parties entered into a confidential Term Sheet to settle the Class Action. On February 7, 2018, the Court stayed the action for all purposes until May 2, 2018, to provide the parties sufficient time to prepare and submit a stipulation of settlement.
Shareholder Derivative Action in Delaware (Zyontz). On October 17, 2017, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed against certain current and former directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, entitled Zyontz v. Kriegsman et al., Case No. 2017-0738-JRS. The complaint essentially sets forth the allegations pled in the federal securities class action in California, asserts a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, and seeks damages, fees and costs, and other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On December 18, 2017, the Company and individual defendants filed motion to dismiss for failure to make a demand on the Board and for failure to state a claim, and a motion to stay the proceedingsany material pending resolution of the federal securities class action.  On January 30, 2018, the parties participated in a mediation. The parties are currently negotiating a settlement agreement comprised of corporate governance reforms that will be submitted to the Court of Chancery for approval.
Shareholder Derivative Action in Delaware (Patterson). On September 1, 2017, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed against the current directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, entitled Patterson v. Kriegsman et al., C.A. No. 2017-0636-TMR. The complaint sets forth claims for breach of fiduciary duty for allegedly disseminating false and misleading information, unjust enrichment, gross mismanagement, abuse of control and corporate waste based on allegations concerning various business decisions matters. The complaint seeks damages, corporate governance reforms, restitution, fees and costs, and other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On September 26, 2017, the Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, for which the opening brief in support of such motion was filed on November 3, 2017, the plaintiff's opposition was filed on December 11, 2017, and the defendants' reply was filed on January 5, 2018. The hearing on the motion to dismiss was heard by the Vice-Chancellor on March 8, 2018, and she took the matter under advisement. On March 13, 2018, the Vice-Chancellor ruled that defendants' motion to dismiss was granted, with prejudice.
legal proceedings.

We intend to vigorously defend against the foregoing complaints.any complaint. We have directors'directors’ and officers'officers’ liability insurance, which will be utilized in the defense of these matters. The liability insurance may not cover all of the future liabilities we may incur in connection with the foregoing matters. These claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, and management's view of these matters may change in the future.

any matter involving our directors or officers.

We evaluate developments in legal proceedings and other matters on a quarterly basis. If an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable, we could incur charges that could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations for the period in which the outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #24#



Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

37
Not Applicable.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #25#


PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ CapitalOTC Market under the symbol "CYTR."“CYTR.” The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock for the periods indicated as reported by The NASDAQ Capital Market:

  High  Low 
Fiscal Year 2017:      
Fourth Quarter $2.94  $1.65 
Third Quarter $6.00  $2.40 
Second Quarter $5.94  $2.52 
First Quarter $3.06  $2.28 
         
Fiscal Year 2016:        
Fourth Quarter $4.44  $2.16 
Third Quarter $16.02  $3.30 
Second Quarter $21.96  $12.78 
First Quarter $18.48  $9.30 
         
OTC Market. The high and low prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

  High  Low 
Fiscal Year 2021:        
Fourth Quarter $0.83  $0.45 
Third Quarter $1.00  $0.54 
Second Quarter $3.21  $0.89 
First Quarter $0.83  $0.45 
         
Fiscal Year 2020        
Fourth Quarter $1.90  $0.53 
Third Quarter $0.72  $0.45 
Second Quarter $0.81  $0.37 
First Quarter $0.83  $0.36 

Holders

On March 16, 2018,23, 2022, there were approximately 350193 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders does not reflect the number of beneficial owners of our common stock for whom shares are held by brokerage firms and other nominees.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends since our inception and do not contemplate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2017,2021, regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans:

 
 
 
Plan Category
 
(a)
 
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  
(b)
 
Number of Issued Shares of Restricted Stock
  
(c)
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Restricted Stock, Warrants and Rights
  
Number of Securities Remaining Available for issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Columns (a) and (b)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by our security holders:            
      2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan  44,371     $34.56    
      2008 Stock Incentive Plan  2,821,141   775,194   8.82   1,247,662 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by our security holders:
 
                
      Outstanding warrants (1)  3,980,781      4.26    
Total  6,846,293   775,194  $6.44   1,247,662 

 

 

Plan Category

 

(a)

 

Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

  

(b)

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Restricted Stock, Warrants and Rights

  Number of Securities Remaining Available for issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a) 
Equity compensation plans approved by our security holders:            
2008 Stock Incentive Plan  2,277,829  $9.98    
Equity compensation plans not approved by our security holders:            
2019 Stock Incentive Plan  550,000  $0.26    
Outstanding warrants (1)  4,167  $33.60    
Total  2,831,996  $8.13    

______________
 

(1) The warrants shown were issued in discrete transactions from time to time as compensation for services rendered by consultants, advisors or other third parties, and do not include warrants sold in capital-raising transactions. The material terms of such warrants were determined based upon arm's-lengtharm’s-length negotiations with the service providers. The warrant exercise prices approximateprice approximates the market price of our common stock at or about the date of grant, and the warrant terms range from two to ten years from the grant date.warrants expire in March 2024. The warrants contain customary anti-dilution adjustments in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, reclassification or combination of our outstanding common stock and similar events and certain of the warrants contain anti-dilution adjustments triggered by other corporate events, such as dividends.

38
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #26#

Comparison of Cumulative Total Returns
The following line graph presentation compares cumulative total stockholder returns of CytRx with The NASDAQ

For more information on the 2008 Stock Market Index and The NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index (the "Peer Index") for the five-year period from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2017. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested in each of our common stock, The NASDAQ Stock Market IndexIncentive Plan and the Peer Index on December 31, 2012,2019 Stock Incentive Plan, see “Item 11. Executive Compensation2008 Stock Incentive Plan and that all dividends were reinvested. This data was furnished by Zacks Investment Research.




  
December 31,
 
  
2013
  
2014
  
2015
  
2016
  
2017
 
CytRx Corporation  235.20   -56.29   -3.28   -85.97   -24.22 
The NASDAQ Stock Market Index  40.12   14.75   6.96   8.87   29.64 
The NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index  64.86   30.51   5.82   -21.99   19.62 

the 2019 Plan Descriptions”.

Recent Issuances of Unregistered Securities

None.

All sales of unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2021, were previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.

Repurchase of Shares

We did not repurchase any of our shares during the year ended December 31, 2017.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #27#

2021.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

General
The following selected financial data are derived from our audited financial statements. Our financial statements for these past five years have been audited by BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. These historical results do not necessarily indicate future results. When you read this data, it is important that you also read our financial statements and related notes, as well as the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Risk Factors" sections of this Annual Report. Financial information provided below has been rounded to the nearest thousand (except for per share data)[RESERVED].
  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Statement of Operations Data:               
Revenue               
Licensing revenue $100,000  $200,000  $100,000  $100,000  $300,000 
Total revenue $100,000  $200,000  $100,000  $100,000  $300,000 
                     
Net loss $(34,986,000) $(50,771,000) $(58,587,000) $(30,118,000) $(47,485,000)
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(1.46) $(3.78) $(5.82) $(3.30) $(8.64)
`                    
Balance Sheet Data:                    
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments $37,643,000  $56,959,000  $57,297,000  $77,840,000  $38,568,000 
Total assets $48,348,000  $62,770,000  $67,024,000  $85,693,000  $41,500,000 
Total stockholders' equity $18,145,000  $24,777,000  $44,079,000  $67,911,000  $10,661,000 
                     
Factors Affecting Comparability
In July 2017, we issued 1,969,697 shares of our common stock as part of an exclusive licensing agreement granted to NantCell, Inc.
In May 2017, we completed a public offering of 5.0 million shares of our common stock. Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, we received proceeds of approximately $14.0 million.
In December 2016, we completed a public offering of 1.9 million shares of our common stock and 550 shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and re-priced outstanding July 2016 warrants to purchase 3.2 million shares of our common stock and extended the term of the warrants to July 2018.  Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, we received proceeds of approximately $7.5 million.
In July 2016, we completed a public offering issuing 4.8 million shares of our common stock and one-year warrants to purchase an equal number of shares of our common stock in a public offering. Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, the Company received proceeds of approximately $18.3 million
    In July 2015, we completed a $28.7 million underwritten public offering, in which we sold and issued approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock at a price of $16.50 per share. Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, the Company received proceeds of approximately $26.8 million.
In February 2014, we completed an $86.0 million underwritten public offering, in which we sold and issued 2.2 million shares of common stock at a price of $39.00 per share. Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, we received proceeds of approximately $80.5 million.
In October 2013, we completed a $25.9 million underwritten public offering, in which we sold and issued 1.9 million shares of common stock at a price of $13.50 per share. Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, we received proceeds of approximately $24.1 million.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #28#

Item 7. MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the discussion under "Selected“Selected Financial Data"Data” and our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, based on current expectations and related to future events and our future financial performance, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many important factors, including those set forth under the caption "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Overview

CytRx Corporation

We are

CytRx Corporation (“CytRx”) is a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology.  Ouroncology and rare diseases. The Company’s focus ishas been on the discovery, research and clinical development of novel anti-cancer drug candidates that employ novel linker technologies to enhance the accumulation and release of cytotoxic anti-cancer agents at the tumor. Since 2008, we have workedDuring 2017, CytRx’s discovery laboratory, located in Freiburg, Germany, synthesized and tested over 75 rationally designed drug conjugates with highly potent payloads, culminating in the creation of two distinct classes of compounds. Four lead candidates (LADR-7 through LADR-10) were selected based on in vitro and animal preclinical studies, stability, and manufacturing feasibility. In 2018, additional animal efficacy and toxicology testing of these lead candidates was conducted. In addition, a novel albumin companion diagnostic, ACDx™, was developed to develop aldoxorubicin,identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with these drug candidates.

39

On June 1, 2018, CytRx launched Centurion BioPharma Corporation (“Centurion”), a private subsidiary, and transferred all of its assets, liabilities and personnel associated with the laboratory operations in Freiburg, Germany. In July 2017 weconnection with said transfer, the Company and Centurion entered into an exclusive worldwide license undera Management Services Agreement whereby the Company agreed to render advisory, consulting, financial and administrative services to Centurion, for which NantCell, Inc. took overCenturion shall reimburse the Company for the cost of such services plus a 5% service charge. The Management Services Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time. Centurion is focused on the development of aldoxorubicin, investedpersonalized medicine for solid tumor treatment. On December 21, 2018, CytRx announced that Centurion had concluded the pre-clinical phase of development for its four LADR™ drug candidates, and for its albumin companion diagnostic (ACDx™). As a result of completing this work, operations taking place at the pre-clinical laboratory in our common stockFreiburg, Germany would no longer be needed and, agreed to make future milestone and royalty payments uponaccordingly, the successful development and commercializationlab was closed at the end of aldoxorubicin. January 2019.

We are now actively pursuing new anti-cancer compoundsa Delaware corporation, incorporated in 1985. Our corporate offices are located at 11726 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California 90049, and our telephone number is (310) 826-5648. Our web site is located at http://www.cytrx.com. We do not incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the information on, or accessible through, our drug discoverywebsite, and research operation at our laboratory facilities in Freiburg, Germany.

you should not consider it as part of this Annual Report.

LADR Drug Discovery Platform

The and Centurion

Centurion’s LADR™ (Linker Activated Drug Release) technology platform is a discovery engine combining our expertise in linker chemistry and albumin biology to create a pipeline of anti-cancer molecules that will avoid unacceptable systemic toxicity while delivering highly potent agents directly to the tumor. WeThey have created a "toolbox"“toolbox” of linker technologies that have the ability to significantly increase the therapeutic index of ultra-high potency drugs (10-1,000 times more potent than traditional chemotherapies)cytotoxins) by controlling the release of the drug payloads and improving drug-like properties. After infusion, these ultra-high potency drug conjugates bind to circulating albumin for transport of the drug to the tumor. Subsequently, due to specific conditions within the tumor, the linkers are cleaved and release the anti-cancer drug payload.


Our current

Centurion’s efforts arewere focused on two classes of ultra-high potency albumin-binding drug conjugates. Our strategy across these programs isThese drug conjugates combine the proprietary LADR™ linkers with novel derivatives of the auristatin and maytansinoid drug classes. These payloads historically have required a targeting antibody for successful administration to generate additional pre-clinical data that will allow them to make informed decisions regardinghumans. These drug conjugates eliminate the selectionneed for a targeting antibody and provide a small molecule therapeutic option with potential broader applicability.

Centurion’s postulated mechanism of one or both programs for moving into human clinical trials either independently or on a partnered basis.


We recently entered into an agreement with Destum Partners, Inc., a leading strategic advisory firm serving companies in the life sciences industry, to assist in our pharma partnering activities.  Destum will be our exclusive advisoraction for the identificationalbumin-binding drug conjugates is as follows:

after administration, the linker portion of the drug conjugate forms a rapid and specific covalent bond to the cysteine-34 position of circulating albumin;
circulating albumin preferentially accumulates at the tumors, bypassing concentration in other non-tumor sites, including the heart, liver and gastrointestinal tract due to a mechanism called “Enhanced Permeability and Retention”;
once localized at the tumor, the acid-sensitive linker is cleaved due to the specific conditions within the tumor and in the tumor microenvironment; and
free active drug is then released into the tumor.

Centurion’s novel companion diagnostic, ACDx™ (albumin companion diagnostic), was developed to identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with the four LADR lead assets.

On March 9, 2022, Centurion was merged into the Company.

Business Strategy for LADR™ Platform

Currently, the Company continues to work on identifying partnership or financing opportunities for LADR™ ultra-high potency drug conjugates.

During 2017, our discovery laboratory synthesizedconjugates and tested over 75 rationally designed drug conjugates with highly potent cytotoxic payloads,their albumin companion diagnostic. We have concluded all research and two distinct classes of compounds have been created.  To date, four lead candidates have been selected baseddevelopment on in vitroLADR and animal preclinical studies, stability,its companion diagnostic and manufacturing feasibility.  Additional animal efficacy and toxicology testing of these lead candidates is underway.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #29#


continue to focus on identifying partnership or financing opportunities.

Aldoxorubicin

Until July 2017, we were focusedconcentrating on the research and clinical development of aldoxorubicin, our modified version of the widely-used chemotherapeuticwidely used cytotoxin agent, doxorubicin. Aldoxorubicin combines the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin with a novel linker-molecule that binds specifically to albumin in the blood to allow for delivery of higher amounts of doxorubicin (3½ to 4 times) without several of the major dose-limiting toxicities seen with administration of doxorubicin alone.

40

On July 27, 2017, we entered into an exclusive worldwide license with ImmunityBio, Inc. (formerly known as NantCell, Inc. ("NantCell"(“ImmunityBio”)), granting to NantCellImmunityBio the exclusive rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize aldoxorubicin in all indications, and our companyindications. As a result, the Company is no longer directly working on development of aldoxorubicin.aldoxorubicin (ImmunityBio merged with NantKwest, Inc. in March 2021). As part of the license, NantCellImmunityBio made a strategic investment of $13 million in CytRx common stock at $6.60 per share, (adjusted to reflect our 2017 reverse stock split), a premium of 92% to the market price on that date. We also issued NantCellImmunityBio a warrant to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock at $6.60, over the following 18 months.which expired on January 26, 2019. We are entitled to receive up to an aggregate of $343 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon achievement of certain regulatory approvals and commercial milestones. We are also entitled to receive ascending double-digit royalties for net sales for soft tissue sarcomas and mid to high single digit royalties for other indications.


There can be no assurance that ImmunityBio will achieve such milestones, approvals or sales with respect to aldoxorubicin. ImmunityBio has initiated a Phase 2, randomized, three-cohort, open-label registrational-intent study for first-line and second-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, which includes aldoxorubicin. On October 13, 2021, ImmunityBio announced that the trial’s Cohort C was fully enrolled. In orderJanuary 2022 at the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, they reported that 27% of third-line or greater patients (17/63) remain on study and that the median overall survival in this highly advanced group of patients (who failed two to fund our business and operations, we have relied primarily upon salessix prior lines of our equity securities, including proceeds fromtreatment) is 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.9, 6.9 months) exceeding the exerciseapproximately three-month historical median overall survival. Of the 63 patients, 30 (48%) had progressed after two prior lines of stock options and common stock purchase warrants and we recently secured long-term financing. We also have received limited funding from our strategic partners and licensees.
At December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $37.6 million. Undertherapy. Median overall survival in this group was 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.0, 9.8 months), more than doubling the terms of the loan agreement, however, we are required to maintain cash equal to a minimum of the greaterhistorical overall survival. (Survival of three months projected cash burn or $10 million. Management believesas reported by Manax et al ASCO GI 2019). In Cohort C, four patients (7%) experienced treatment-related SAEs that its current resources will be sufficientincluded peripheral edema, pyrexia, anemia and atrial flutter. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Based on the strength of earlier data and the significant unmet medical need, ImmunityBio submitted an amendment to fund its operationsthe FDA to increase enrollment in Cohort C and plan to meet with the FDA in 2022 to discuss a potential path for the foreseeable future. This estimateapproval of combination therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Aldoxorubicin is a conjugate of the commonly prescribed cytotoxin agent doxorubicin that binds to circulating albumin in the bloodstream and is believed to concentrate the drug at the site of the tumor. Aldoxorubicin, has been tested in over 600 patients with various types of cancer. Specifically, it is comprised of (6-maleimidocaproyl) hydrazine, an acid-sensitive molecule that is conjugated to doxorubicin. The initial indication for aldoxorubicin was for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Aldoxorubicin has received Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of STS. ODD provides several benefits, including seven years of market exclusivity after approval, certain R&D related tax credits, and protocol assistance by the FDA. European regulators granted aldoxorubicin Orphan designation for STS, which confers ten years of market exclusivity, among other benefits.

ImmunityBio also lists ongoing clinical studies in head and neck and triple-negative breast cancer and has submitted a protocol with the FDA for glioblastoma; it is currently reviewing its options in STS.

41

Molecular Chaperone Assets (Orphayzme)

In 2011, CytRx sold the rights to arimoclomol and iroxanadine, based on molecular chaperone regulation technology, to Orphazyme A/S (formerly Orphazyme ApS) in part, upon our currently projected expendituresexchange for 2018a one-time, upfront payment and the first three monthsright to receive up to a total of 2019$120 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of certain pre-specified regulatory and business milestones, as well as royalty payments based on a specified percentage of any net sales of products derived from arimoclomol. As a result of Orphazyme’s disclosure that the pivotal phase 3 clinical trial for arimoclomol in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis did not meet its primary and secondary endpoints, the maximum amount that CytRx has the right to receive is now approximately $27.8 million (unaudited), $100 million. Orphazyme is testing arimoclomol in Niemann-Pick disease Type C (“NPC”) and Gaucher disease. Orphazyme has highlighted positive Phase 2/3 clinical trial data in patients with NPC and previously submitted a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”). On June 18, 2021, Orphazyme announced it had received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA indicating the need for additional data. In late October 2021, Orphazyme announced it held a Type A meeting with the FDA, at which includes approximately $1.5 million (unaudited) for its clinical programs, approximately $3.1 million (unaudited) for pre-clinical development of new high potency cytotoxic albumin-binding cancer drugs, approximately $0.7 million (unaudited) for general operation of its clinical programs, approximately $10.1 million (unaudited) for other generalthe FDA recommended that Orphazyme submit additional data, information and administrative expensesanalyses to address certain topics in the Complete Response Letter and $12.4 million of interest and principal payments on our outstanding term loan. These projected expenditures are also based upon numerous other assumptions andengage in further interactions with the FDA to identify a pathway to resubmission. The FDA concurred with Orphazyme’s proposal to remove the cognition domain from the NPC Clinical Severity Scale (“NPCCSS”) endpoint, with the result that the primary endpoint is permitted to be recalculated using the 4- domain NPCCSS, subject to many uncertainties,the submission of additional requested information which Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it intends to provide. To bolster the confirmatory evidence already submitted, the FDA affirmed that it would require additional in vivo or pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Based on [ ]. Orphazyme is planning to request a Type C Meeting with the FDA in the second quarter of 2022. Subject to discussions with the regulatory body, Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it plans to resubmit the NDA for arimoclomol in the second half of 2022.

Orphazyme had also submitted a Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”) with the European Medicines Agency (the “EMA”). In February 2022, Orphazyme announced that although they had received positive feedback from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) of the EMA, they were notified by the CHMP of a negative trend vote on the MAA for arimoclomol for NPC following an oral explanation. The trend vote indicates that the CHMP’s current orientation is to not approve arimoclomol when it convenes by the end of March 2022. Orphazyme has publicly indicated that it considers it unlikely that this position will change before the formal vote is undertaken in April 2022. Orphazyme will assess its strategic options and actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections. While these projections represent our current expected expenditures, we haveprovide an update to the ability to reducemarket at the amounts and alter the timing of research and development expenditures as needed to manage our liquidity needs while still advancing our research and development objectives. We will ultimately be required to obtain additional funding in order to execute our long-term business plans, although we do not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide us with long term debt or capital. We cannot assure that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain additional funding when needed, we may not be able to execute our business plans and our business may suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

applicable time.

Research and Development

Expenditures for research and development activities related to continuing operations were $19.8 million, $35.9 million and $43.4 million, respectively, for$0 in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,$0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 or approximately 60%, 68%0% and 68%12%, respectively, of our total expenses.

Research and development expenses are further discussed below under "Critical“Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates"Estimates” and "Results“Results of Operations."


Our

We do not currently projectedproject incurring any material research and development expenditures for 2018 include approximately $1.5 million for our clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, approximately $3.1 million for pre-clinicalin 2022. Should the Company’s subsidiary, Centurion BioPharma, be successful in raising capital to further develop its LADR compounds along with a companion diagnostic, only then would the Company incur research and development of new high potency cytotoxic albumin-binding cancer drugs, and approximately $0.7 million related to supporting our clinical programs. The actual cost of our clinical programs could differ significantly from our current projections due to any additional requirements or delays, or if actual costs are higher than current management estimates for other reasons. In the event that actual costs of our clinical programs, or any of our other ongoing research activities, are significantly higher than our current estimates, we may be required to significantly modify our planned level of operations.

expenditures.

All of our product candidates in development must be approved by the FDA or corresponding foreign governmental agencies before they can be marketed. The process for obtaining FDA and foreign government approvals is both time-consuming and costly, with no certainty of a successful outcome. A discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties associated with our business is set forth in the "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #30#

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. Costs to acquire technologies, including licenses, that are utilized in research and development and that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Technology developed for use in our product candidates is expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established.

CriticalAccounting Policies and Estimates

Management's

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to stock options, impairment of long-lived assets, including accrued liabilities and certain expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report. We believe the following critical accounting policies are affected by our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

42
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of license fees from strategic alliances with pharmaceutical companies, as well as service and grant revenues. Service revenue consists of contract research and laboratory consulting. Grant revenues consist of government and private grants.
Monies received for license fees are deferred and recognized ratably over the performance period in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-element Arrangements ("ASC 605-25"). Milestone payments will be recognized upon achievement of the milestone as long as the milestone is deemed substantive and we have no other performance obligations related to the milestone and collectability is reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt, or recognized upon termination of the agreement and all related obligations. Deferred revenue represents amounts received prior to revenue recognition.
Revenues from contract research, government grants, and consulting fees are recognized over the respective contract periods as the services are performed, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Once all conditions of the grant are met and no contingencies remain outstanding, the revenue is recognized as grant fee revenue and an earned but unbilled revenue receivable is recorded.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. Costs to acquire technologies, including licenses, that are utilized in research and development and that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Technology developed for use in our product candidates is expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established.

Clinical Trial Expenses

Clinical trial expenses, which are included in research and development expenses, include obligations resulting from our contracts with various contract research organizations, or CROs, in connection with conducting clinical trials of our product candidates. We recognize expenses for these activities based on a variety of factors, including actual and estimated labor hours, clinical site initiation activities, patient enrollment rates, estimates of external costs and other activity-based factors. We believe that this method is the best measure of the efforts expended on a clinical trial with the expenses we record. We adjust our rate of clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from our estimates. If our estimates prove to be incorrect, clinical trial expenses recorded in any particular period could vary.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #31#

Stock-based Compensation

Our stock-based employee compensation plans are described in Note 13

The fair value of the Notes to Financial Statements. We follow the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"), which requires the measurementCompany’s stock option and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees.

Forrestricted stock options and stock warrants paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, we recognize compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ("ASC 505-50").
Non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period. At the end of each financial reporting period prior to performance, the value of these options, as calculatedis estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricingBlack-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, is determined, and compensation expense recognized or recovered during the period is adjusted accordingly. Since the fair market value of options grantedwhich uses certain assumptions related to non-employees is subject to change in the future, the amountrisk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the common stock options or warrants are fully vested.
restricted stock, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

of Common Stock

Basic and diluted net loss per share of common share attributable to common shareholdersstock is computed usingbased on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Dilutedof common stock outstanding plus the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common stock had been issued using the treasury stock method. Potential shares of common stock are excluded from the computation when their effect is antidilutive. Common stock equivalents that could potentially dilute net loss per common share is computed usingin the weighted-average number of common sharesfuture, and common share equivalents outstanding. Potentially dilutive stock options and warrants to purchase approximately 7.6 million, 8.3 million and 3.6 million shares at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively,which were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, because the effect would be anti-dilutive.were as follows:

43
Potential Strategic Alternatives
From time to time, we may consider strategic alternatives available to us to enhance shareholder value. Strategic alternatives could include the acquisition of or strategic partnership with one or more parties or the licensing of some of our proprietary technologies. See "Item 1A – Risk Factors – The impact and results of our exploration of strategic alternatives are uncertain and may not be successful."

  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
    
Options to acquire common stock  2,827,829   3,162,700 
Warrants to acquire common stock  4,167   193,196 
Convertible preferred stock  9,363,637    
Preferred Investment option  11,363,637    
   23,559,270   3,355,896 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $13,176,663, utilized cash in operations of $12,308,890, and the Company had an accumulated deficit of $484,075,711 as of December 31, 2021. In addition, the Company has no recurring revenue. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

In order to fund our business and operations, we have relied primarily upon sales of our equity securities, including proceeds from the exercise of stock options and common stock purchase warrants and a long-term loan financing completed in February 2016.financing. We also have received limited funding from our strategic partners and licensees. At December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $37.6 million. Under the terms of the loan agreement, however, we are required to maintain cash equal to a minimum of the greater of three months projected cash burn or $10 million. Management believes that its current resources will be sufficient to fund its operations for the foreseeable future. This estimate is based, in part, upon our currently projected expenditures for 2018 and the first three months of 2019 of approximately $27.8 million (unaudited), which includes approximately $1.5 million (unaudited) for its clinical programs, approximately $3.1 million (unaudited) for pre-clinical development of new high potency cytotoxic albumin-binding cancer drugs, approximately $0.7 million (unaudited) for general operation of its clinical programs, approximately $10.1 million (unaudited) for other general and administrative expenses and $12.4 million of interest and principal payments on our outstanding Term Loans (defined below). These projected expenditures are also based upon numerous other assumptions and subject to many uncertainties, and actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections. While these projections represent our current expected expenditures, we have the ability to reduce the amounts and alter the timing of research and development expenditures as needed to manage our liquidity needs while still advancing our research and development objectives. We will ultimately be required to obtain additional funding in order to execute our long-term business plans, although we do not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide us with long term debt or capital. We cannot assure that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain additional funding when needed, we may not be able to execute our business plans and our business may suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We have approximately $1.3 million of contractual obligations in 2022 and expect to pay these out of the Company’s balance sheet cash. We have no material contractual obligations beyond 2022.

If NantCellImmunityBio obtains marketing approval and successfully commercializes aldoxorubicin, we anticipate it will take two years, and possibly longer, for us to generate significant recurring revenue, and we will be dependent on future financing until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenue. There are also no certainties that Orphazyme will be successful in obtaining FDA and EMA approval for arimoclomol or choose to commercialize arimoclomol. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain adequate financing would adversely affect our ability to operate as a going concern. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to stockholders may result and new investors could have rights superior to holderssome or all of the shares issued in this offering.our existing equity holders. In addition, debt financing, if available, may include restrictive covenants. If adequate funds are not available to us, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets or to delay or reduce the scope of or eliminate some portion or all of our development programs or clinical trials. We also may have to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #32#

Effective November 1, 2017, we completed a 1-for-6 reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common and preferred stock, reduced our authorized shares of both common and preferred stock by one-sixth; no change was made to the per-share par value of the common stock. All share and per share amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split as if it had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

Discussion of Operating, Investing and Financing Activities

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net losscash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20172021 was $35.0$12.3 million, which was primarily the result of a net loss from operations of $13.2 million, offset by $0.9 million in net cash inflows associated with changes in assets and liabilities. The net cash inflows associated with changes in assets and liabilities were primarily due to increases of $0.9 million of accrued expenses and other current liabilities, $0.2 million of amortization of right-of-use asset and $0.1 million of insurance receivable, offset by reductions of $0.2 million of prepaid expenses and other current assets and $0.2 million of decrease in lease liabilities.

Net cash used forin operating activities for that period was $27.2 million. The net loss reflects $3.3 million of stock option and warrant expense, interest expense on the Term Loan of $3.8 million and a non-cash gain of $1.4 million on the fair value adjustment of the warrant liability.

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 20162020 was $50.8$6.1 million, which was primarily the result of a net loss from operations of $6.7 million, offset by $0.2 million of adjustments associated with changes in assets and cash used for operating activities for that period was $49.9 million.liabilities. The net loss reflects $6.7cash inflows associated with changes in assets and liabilities were primarily due to increases of $0.2 million in accounts payable, $0.2 million of amortization of right-of-use asset, offset by reductions of $0.1 million of prepaid expenses and other current assets and $0.1 million of decrease in lease liabilities. We also recognized stock option and warrantbased compensation expense interest expense on the Term Loan of $2.8 million and a non-cash gain$-0.3 million.

44

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

We purchased $7,000 of $3.8 million on the fair value adjustment of the warrant liability.

Net loss forfixed assets in the year ended December 31, 2015 was $58.6 million,2021 and cash used for operating activities for that period was $47.6 million. The net loss reflects $7.4 million$25,000 of stock option and warrant expense, and a non-cash gain of $4.4 million on the fair value adjustment of the warrant liability.
Forfixed assets in the year ended December 31, 2017, no money was provided by investing activities,2020, and $0.1 million was used fordo not expect any significant capital spending during the purchase of equipment and furnishings.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, $34.0 million was provided by investing activities. This included $35.0 million of net proceedsnext 12 months.

Cash Flows from the sale of short-term investments partially offset by the purchase of equipment and furnishings of $1.0 million, primarily for our laboratory in Freiburg, Germany.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, $10.3 million was provided by investing activities. This included $10.6 million net proceeds from the sale of short-term investments and the difference for purchase of equipment and furnishings, primarily for our laboratory in Freiburg, Germany.

CashFinancing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20172021 was $8.0$9.1 million, which included $14.0$9.2 million of net proceeds received from our May 2017 public offering. We also received $6.1 million fromwhich is related to the sale of our common sharesstock, Series C 10% Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to NantCell, Inc. We also received net proceedspreferred investment options described in Note 2 of $3.2our audited financial statements contained in this Annual Report and $0.1 million from the exercise of stock options, and warrants and made principal Term Loan paymentsoffset slightly by $0.2 million paid in respect of $15.0 million.

Cash provided by financing activities forpreferred stock dividend. In the year ended December 31, 2016 was $50.5 million, which included $25.8 million of net proceeds received from our December and July 2016 public offerings.  We also received net proceeds of $24.0 million from our Term Loans in February 2016 and $0.7 million from the exercise of2020, stock options and warrants.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $27.4 million, which included $26.8 millionwere exercised, resulting in a cash infusion of net proceeds received from our July 2015 public offering.
Term Loan Facility
On February 5, 2016, we$39,000.

The registration rights agreement entered into between us and the Investor on July 13, 2021, contains a loan and security agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. ("HTGC"), as administrative agent and lender, and Hercules Technology III, L.P., as lender ("Hercules"), pursuanttriggering event which would require us to which the lenders made term loanspay to us on February 8, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $25 million (the "Term Loans").  The Term Loans bear interest at the daily variable rate per annum equal to 6.0% plus the prime rate, or 10.5%, whichever is greater. We are required to make interest-only payments on the Term Loans through February 28, 2017, and beginning on March 1, 2017 blended equal monthly installments of principal amortization and accrued interest until the maturity dateany holder of the Term Loans on February 1, 2020. Under the terms of the loan, we are required to maintainPreferred Stock an amount in cash, as partial liquidated damages and not as a minimum cash balancepenalty, equal to the greaterproduct of (i) $10 million or (ii) forward three months projected cash burn. As security under our obligations, we issued2.0% multiplied by the aggregate subscription amount paid by such holder for shares of Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to the lenders warrantsPurchase Agreement; provided, however, that such partial liquidated damages shall not exceed 24% of the aggregate subscription amounts paid by such holders pursuant to purchase a total of 105,691 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $12.30. These warrants are classified as equity warrants with a fair value of $633,749. All outstanding principal and accruedthe Purchase Agreement or $1,977,600. If we fail to pay any partial liquidated damages within seven days after the date payable, we will be required to pay interest on any such amounts at a rate equal to the term loans will be due and payable in full onlesser of 18% per annum or the maturity date of February 1, 2020.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #33#


On July 28, 2017, we entered into an Amended Loan Services Agreement withmaximum rate permitted by applicable law. We have been subject to the lenders of the Term Loans whereby we agreed to make an immediate payment of $5 millionsuch partial liquidated damages since September 2021. See “Results of principal and unpaid interest, a further $5 million paymentOperations – Liquidated Damages”.

We continue to evaluate potential future sources of principal and unpaid interest by September 30, 2017, and agreed to an updated schedule of monthly payments and a new maturity date of August 1, 2018.


On July 28, 2017, we entered into a First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement providing for our payment, on July 28, 2017, of $5.0 million in outstanding principal and unpaid interest due under the Loan Agreement, and for our potential repayment, on or prior to September 30, 2017, of an additional $5.0 million outstanding principal under the Loan Agreement. We made the First Repayment on July 28, 2017.  Pursuant to the Amendment, the lenders consented to the License Transaction with NantCell and agreed that the License Transaction is deemed a "Permitted Transfer" under the Loan Agreement, and confirmed that the sale of our common stock to NantCell is not an "Equity Event" under the Loan Agreement.

      In connection with the Loan Agreement, we restructured the existing lender warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to approximately 105,691 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $12.30 per share. Pursuant to the Amendment, a portion of the warrants (representing 80% of the total number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants) was amended to change the exercise price of such portion of the warrants from $12.30 per share to the 30-day volume-weighted average price of our common stock over the 30-day period beginning 15 days before the July 28, 2017 announcement of the License Transaction (the "Warrant Amendments").

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital, expenditures, or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations
We acquire assets still in development and enter into research and development arrangements with third parties that often require milestone and royalty payments to the third-party contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events linked to the success of the asset in development. Milestone payments may be required, contingent upon the successful achievement of an important point in the development life-cycle of the pharmaceutical product (e.g., approval of the product for marketing by a regulatory agency). We also typically have to make royalty payments based upon a percentage of the sales of the pharmaceutical product in the event that regulatory approval for marketing is obtained. Because of the contingent nature of these payments, they are not included in the table of contractual obligations.
These arrangements may be material individually, and in the event that multiple milestones are reached in the same period, the aggregate charge to expense could be material to the results of operations in any one period. In addition, these arrangements often give us the discretion to unilaterally terminate development of the product, which would allow us to avoid making the contingent payments; however, we are unlikely to cease development if the compound successfully achieves clinical testing objectives.
Our current contractual obligations that will require future cash payments are as follows (in thousands):
  Payments due by periods as of December 31, 2017 
Contractual Obligations Total  Year 1  Years 2 and 3  Years 4 and 5  Years 6 and beyond 
Operating lease obligations $710  $373  $337  $  $ 
  Employment obligations  4,848   1,678   2,113   1,057    
  Term loan obligation  12,377   12,377          
  R&D contract obligations  1,000   1,000          
   Total contractual obligations $18,935  $15,428  $2,450  $1,057  $ 
(1)
Operating leases are primarily our facility lease obligations, as well as equipment and software lease obligations with third party vendors.
(2)
Employment agreements include management contracts that provide for minimum salary levels, adjusted periodically at the discretion of our Compensation Committee, as well as minimum bonuses and
employee benefits, in some cases.
(3)Term loan obligation includes principal and interest payments and an end fee payment.
(4)Research and development obligations relate primarily to our Reimbursement Agreement with NantCell, Inc.

 We apply the disclosure provisions of ASC 460, Guarantees ("ASC 460"), to our contractual guarantees and indemnities. We have provided contractual indemnities to other parties against possible losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties in connection with various types of third-party claims, as well as indemnities to our officers and directors against third party claims arising from the services they provide to us. To date, we have not incurred material costs as a result of these indemnities, and we do not expectcurrently have commitments from any third parties to incur material costs in the future; further,provide us with additional capital and we maintain insurancemay not be able to cover certain losses arising from these indemnities. Accordingly, we have not accrued any liabilities related to these indemnities.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #34#

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
At December 31, 2017, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwardsobtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. The results of $373.7 million and $236.3 million, respectively, available to offset against future taxable income, which expire in 2018 through 2037.
As a result of a change in-control that occurred in the CytRx shareholder base in 2013, approximately $136.8 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards became substantially limited in their annual availability. We currently believe that the remaining $236.9 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards,our technology licensing efforts and the $236.3 million in state net operating loss carryforwards,actual proceeds of any fund-raising activities will determine our ongoing ability to operate as a going concern. Our ability to obtain future financings through joint ventures, product licensing arrangements, royalty sales, equity financings, grants or otherwise is subject to market conditions and our ability to identify parties that are unrestricted.
Aswilling and able to enter into such arrangements on terms that are satisfactory to us. Depending upon the outcome of December 31, 2017,our fundraising efforts, the accompanying financial information may not necessarily be indicative of our future financial condition. Failure to obtain adequate financing would adversely affect our ability to operate as a going concern.

There can be no assurance that we also had researchwill be able to generate revenues from our product candidates and development tax credits for federal and state purposes of approximately $16.6 million and $21.9 million, respectively, available for offset against future income taxes, which expire in 2022 through 2037. Based on an assessment of all available evidence including, but not limited to, our limited operating history in its core business and lack of profitability, uncertainties of the commercial viability of its technology, the impact of government regulation and healthcare reform initiatives, and other risks normally associated with biotechnology companies,become profitable. Even if we have concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss carryforwards and credits willbecome profitable, we may not be realized and, as a result, a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.

able to sustain that profitability.

Results of Operations

We incurred a net loss of $35.0 million, $50.8$13.2 million and $58.6$6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

During 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2015,2020, we recognized no service revenue and earned an immaterial amount of license fees and grant revenue. All future licensing fees under our current licensing agreements are dependent upon successful development milestones being achieved by our licensees.  In 2017, we recognized deferred revenue of $6.9 million from the exclusive licensing agreement signed with NantCell, Inc.  We anticipate recognizing that revenue in 2018.

licensees

Due to the nature of research and development, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.

Research and Development

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  (In thousands) 
Research and development expenses $19,279  $34,107  $41,805 
Non-cash research and development expenses  12       
Employee stock and stock option expense  549   1,823   1,591 
Total $19,840  $35,930  $43,396 

from Continuing Operations

Research expenses are expenses incurred by us in the discovery of new information that will assist us in the creation and the development of new drugs or treatments. Development expenses are expenses incurred by us in our efforts to commercialize the findings generated through our research efforts.

Research and development expenses

We incurred during 2017, 2016 and 2015 relate to our various development programs. In 2017, ourno research and development expenses decreased substantially over 2016 since our pivotal, global Phase 3 clinical trial for STS with aldoxorubicin wound down induring the year. These expenses included $11.7 million for our clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, $3.3 million for our drug discovery laboratory,year ended December 31, 2021 and approximately $4.3 million for general operations of our clinical program, including licensing fees. In 2016, our research and development expenses decreased over 2015 primarily due to a reduction in costs for our pivotal, global Phase 3 clinical trial for STS with aldoxorubicin. The costs of our global Phase 2b clinical trial in SCLC remained consistent with$800,000 during the prior year. These expenses included approximately $27.1 million for our clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, approximately $2.3 million at our drug discovery laboratory, and approximately $4.3 million for general operation of our clinical programs. In 2015, research and development expenses totaled approximately $37.0 million for our clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, which included a full year of costs in our pivotal, global Phase trial, approximately $1.7 million at our drug discovery laboratory, and approximately $3.6 million for general operation of our clinical programs.ended December 31, 2020.

45
As compensation to consultants, or in connection with the acquisition of technology, we sometimes issue shares of common stock, stock options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock. For financial statement purposes, we value these shares of common stock, stock options, and warrants at the fair value of the common stock, stock options or warrants granted, or the services received, whichever is more reliably measurable. In 2017, we record $11,600 of non-cash expense, as compared to $0 in both 2016 and 2015.  In 2017, we recorded $0.5 million of employee stock and stock option expense, as compared to $1.8 million in 2016 and $1.6 million in 2015.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #35#


General and Administrative


  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  (In thousands) 
General and administrative expenses $9,718  $11,078  $13,871 
Stock, stock option and warrant expenses to non-employees and consultants  874   236   226 
Employee stock and stock option expense  1,910   4,677   5,568 
Total $12,502  $15,991  $19,665 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
  (In thousands) 
General and administrative expenses $5,966  $5,673 
Employee stock and stock option expense     328 
Total $5,966  $6,001 

General and administrative expenses include all administrative salaries and general corporate expenses, including legal expenses associated with the prosecution of our intellectual property. Our general and administrative expenses, excluding common stock, stock options and warrants issued, were $9.7 million, $11.1$6.0 million and $13.9$5.7 million in 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. In 2017, the general and administrative expenses decreased by 12.3%, primarily due to a decrease in salaries, since 2016 included pre-commercialization activities in the first half of the year. In 2015, these expenses included litigation settlement expenses of $5.5 million (of which a non-cash amount of $4.5 million was settled through the issuance of our common shares).

From time to time, we issue shares of our common stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of our common stock to consultants and other service providers in exchange for services. For financial statement purposes, we value these shares of common stock, stock options, and warrants at the fair value of the common stock, stock options or warrants granted, or the services received whichever we can measure more reliably. In 2017,the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded $0.9 million ofhad no such expenses, as compared to $0.2 million and $0.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.expense. We recorded employee stock option expense of $1.9 million, $4.7 million$0 and $5.6$0.3 million in 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

Settlement with former Chief Executive Officer

On January 3, 2022, in connection with the Separation Agreement, Steven A. Kriegsman, who served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CytRx Corporation, departed from his roles as an officer of the Company and the Chairman of the Company’s board of directors, Mr. Kriegsman’s departure as Chairman of the Board was not in connection with any disagreement between Mr. Kriegsman and the Company, its management, the Board or any committee of the Board on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices, or any other matter.

In connection with the execution of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kriegsman’s existing executive employment agreement, as amended (the “Prior Employment Agreement”), was terminated; provided, however, that certain surviving customary confidentiality provisions and milestone and royalty payments as defined in the Prior Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. Pursuant to the Prior Employment Agreement and the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kriegsman received a lump sum cash payment equal to approximately $6.0 million.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 20152020 were approximately $0.6 million, $0.5 million$14,000 and $0.3 million,$29,000, respectively. The depreciation expense reflects the depreciation of our equipment and furnishings.

Other Income (Expense)
We realized

Liquidated Damages

On July 13, 2021, the Company entered into a small foreign exchange loss in 2017, other incomeSecurities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with a single institutional investor (the “Investor”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $0.2$10 million and net proceeds of approximately $9.2 million. The transaction closed on July 16, 2021. Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold and issued (i) 2 million shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.88 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $1.76 million in 2016a registered direct offering (the “Registered Direct Offering”) and (ii) 8,240 shares of Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1,000 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $8.24 million, in a concurrent private placement (the “Private Placement” and, together with the Registered Direct Offering, the “July 2021 Offerings”). The shares of the Preferred Stock are convertible, upon shareholder approval as described below, into an aggregate of up to 9,363,637 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.88 per share. CytRx also issued to the Investor an unregistered preferred investment option (the “Preferred Investment Option”) that allows for the purchase of up to 11,363,637 shares of common stock for additional gross proceeds of approximately $10 million if the Preferred Investment Option is exercised in full. The Preferred Investment Option has a term equal to five and one-half years commencing upon the Company increasing its authorized common stock following shareholder approval.

46

In connection with the July 2021 Offerings, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of July 13, 2021 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), with the investor named therein, pursuant to which the Company will undertake to file, within five calendar days of the date of the filing of the proxy statement seeking the Stockholder Approval, a resale registration statement to register the shares of common stock issuable upon: (i) the conversion of the Preferred Stock sold in the Private Placement and (ii) the exercise of the Preferred Investment Option (collectively, the “Registrable Securities”); and to cause such registration statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as possible after the filing thereof, but in any event no later than 75 days following the pricing date of this offering, or no later than 105 days following such date in the event of a “full review” by the SEC, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to keep such registration statement continuously effective under the Securities Act until the date that all Registrable Securities covered by such registration statement have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144.

The Registration Rights Agreement provides for liquidated damages to the extent that the Company does not file or maintain a registration statement in accordance with the terms thereof. The Registration Rights Agreement contains a triggering event which would require us to pay to any holder of the Preferred Stock an amount in cash, as partial liquidated damages and not as a penalty, on a monthly basis equal to the product of 2.0% multipled by the aggregate subscription amount paid by such holder for shares of Preferred Stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement; provided, however, that such partial liquidated damages shall not exceed 24% of the aggregate subscription amounts paid by such holders pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, or $1,977,600. If we fail to pay any partial liquidated damages within seven days after the date payable, we will be required to pay interest on any such amounts at a rate equal to the lesser of 18% per annum or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law.

The Company was required to hold a special shareholders meeting to approve an increase in authorized common shares to allow for conversion of preferred shares. At the first such meeting, held on September 23, 2021, the proposal was not approved by shareholders. On March 15, 2022,the Company held a special meeting of stockholders, which was originally opened and subsequently adjourned on September 23, 2021, at which meeting the Company’s stockholders, by an affirmative vote of the majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of capital stock, approved the amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect an increase in the number of shares of authorized common stock, par value $0.001 per share, from 41,666,666 shares to 62,393,940 shares, and to make a VAT refund, andcorresponding change to the number of authorized shares of capital stock in order to comply with the Company’s contractual obligations under a de minimussecurities purchase agreement entered into on July 13, 2021 (the “Authorized Share Increase Amendment”). The number of shares of authorized preferred stock of the Company remains unchanged.

On March 15, 2022, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware to effect the Authorized Share Increase Amendment.

Since the proposal was not approved on September 23, 2021, the Company was liable for liquidated damages in the monthly amount of other income$164,800, up to a maximum of approximately $2 million, or twelve-monthly payments. In 2021, the Company made three monthly payments and has accrued additional payments through March 15, 2022, of $615,000, for a total of approximately $1.1 million On March 15, 2022, the necessary proposal was approved by the shareholders and it is anticipated that there will no longer be any further liquidated damages beyond the end of March 2022. There were no such payments in 2015.

2020.

Interest Income

Interest income was $0.4$17,000 in the year ended December 31, 2021 and $0.1 million in 2017, $0.3 million in 2016 and $0.2 million in 2015.the year ended December 31, 2020. The variancesvariance between years areis attributable primarily to the amount of funds available for investment each year and, to a lesser extent, changes in prevailing market interest rates.

Interest Expense
On February 5, 2016, we entered into a loan

Known Trends, Events and security agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. ("HTGC"), as administrative agent and lender, and Hercules Technology III, L.P., as lender. Uncertainties

The lenders made term loans on February 8, 2016 infuture events that would have the aggregate principal amount of $25 million, and at an interest rate of 9.5%. The interest rate is pegged to the Prime rate and at December 31, 2017, the interest rate stood at 10.5%. Total interest expense in 2017 was $3.8 million, $2.8 million in 2016 and $0 in 2015.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #36#

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." The objective of the ASU is to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have amost material impact on our financial statements.


In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash ReceiptsCompany relate to the Registration Rights Agreement the Company entered into on July 13, 2021, whereby we are required to pay as partial liquidated damages an amount not to exceed $1,977,600 up until the Company has and Cash Payments (a consensusmaintains an effective registration statement in accordance with the terms of the Emerging Issues Task Force)." The objectiveRegistration Rights Agreement. It is anticipated however that there will be no further payments due beyond the end of ASU No. 2016-15 isMarch 2022. In addition, under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement entered into on July 13, 2021, we are required to provide specific guidancepay, on eight cash flow classification issues and how to reduce diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are still in the process of determining the impact that the implementation of ASU 2016-15 will have on our financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 includes several areas of simplification to stock compensation including simplifications to the accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefitsa quarterly basis, a 10% dividend on the Statementoutstanding shares of Cash Flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning afterSeries C Preferred Stock, with an outstanding balance of $8,240,000 as of December 15, 2016. We adopted this Standard on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this Standard did not have a material impact to our financial position or our results of operations.31, 2021.

47

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In FebruaryJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842),"2016-13, Credit Losses - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASC 326”). The standard significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets, including accounts and notes receivables. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model, under which requires companies will recognize allowances based on expected rather than incurred losses. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to recognize all leasesretained earnings as assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. This ASU retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases, and the classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the current accounting literature. The result of retaining a distinction between finance leases and operating leases is that under the lessee accounting model in Topic 842, the effect of leases in a statement of operations and a statement of cash flows is largely unchanged from previous GAAP.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our financial statements. Although we have not finalized our process of evaluating the impact of adoption of the ASU on our financial statements, we expect there will not be a material increase to assets and liabilities on our balance sheet for leases currently classified as operating leases.


 In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." ASU 2016-01 amends various aspectsbeginning of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure for financial instruments. With respect to the Company's financial statements, the most significant impact relates to the accounting for equity investments. It will impact the disclosure and presentation of financial assets and liabilities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annualfirst reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption by public entities is permitted only for certain provisions. We do not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 "Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes". ASU 2015-17 simplifies the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes and requires that all deferred taxes be presented as noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this update did not have a material effect on our financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirementsperiod in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition", and requires entities to recognize revenue when they transfer control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We are currently assessing the method of adoption and the impact this new guidance will have on our financial statements. We expect to adopt these standards using the modified retrospective method.is effective. The timing of revenue recognition for variable consideration under our licensing and collaboration agreements may be different as a result of this new guidance. We are reviewing our licensing agreement for variable consideration, and if any such consideration exists, whether it should be estimated and recognized earlier than under the current revenue guidance.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASU 2015-14") which deferred thestandard is effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date and allows for adoption using a full retrospective method, or a modified retrospective method. We will adopt the new standard in our first quarter 2018 using the modified retrospective method and are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of theDecember 15, 2019. The adoption of this standardASU 2016-13 is not expected to have a material impact on ourthe Company’s financial statements.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #37#


position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Other recent authoritative guidance issued by the FASB (including technical corrections to the ASC), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) did not, or are not expected to, have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Historically, our exposure to market risk is limited primarily to interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly because a significant portion of our investments are in short-term debt securities issued by the U.S. government and institutional money market funds. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal. Due to the short-term nature of our investments, we believe that we are not exposed to any material market risk. We do not have any speculative or hedging derivative financial instruments or foreign currency instruments. If interest rates had varied by 10% in the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, it would not have had a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows for that period.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our consolidated financial statements and supplemental schedule and notes thereto as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, together with the reports thereon of our independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2017,2021, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017,2021, as described further below.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to have a material effect, on our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"(“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Edition) ("the Framework"Framework”). Based upon management'smanagement’s assessment using the criteria contained in COSO, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

 Our2021.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as of(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017 has been audited by BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report below.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #38#


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
CytRx Corporation
Los Angeles, California
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We2021 that have audited CytRx Corporation's (the "Company's")materially affected, or are reasonably likely to have a material affect, our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the "COSO criteria"). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts and our report dated March 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying "Item 9A, Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting." Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ BDO USA, LL
Los Angeles, California
March 16, 2018

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #39#



reporting.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Item 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

48

None.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #40#


PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth information concerning our directors and executive officers:

Name(1) Age 

Class of

Director (1)

(2)

 Position
Steven A. KriegsmanLouis Ignarro, Ph.D. 7680 III Director, Chairman of the Board and (3)(4)
Joel Caldwell66IIILead Director(3)(4)
Jennifer K Simpson, Ph.D.53IIIDirector
Stephen Snowdy, Ph.D.53Chief Executive Officer
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.John Y. Caloz 7670        ILead Director (2) (3) (4) (5)
Joel Caldwell62IIIDirector (2) (4) (5)
Earl Brien. M.D.57IIIDirector (2) (3) (4) (5)
John Y. Caloz66Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice-President

(1)Dr. Ignarro is contractually obligated to step down as a director of the Board prior to the 2022 annual meeting of our stockholders.
Felix Kratz, Ph.D.
(2)55Senior Vice President-Drug Development
____________

(1)Our Class I director serves until the 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders,our stockholders; our Class II directors servedirector serves until the 20202023 annual meeting of our stockholders, and our Class III directors serve until the 20182024 annual meeting of our stockholders.

(2)
(3)Members of our Audit Committee. Mr. Caldwell is Chairman of the Committee.

(3)Members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Dr. Ignarro is Chairman of the Committee.

(4)Members of our Compensation Committee. Dr. Ignarro is Chairman of the Committee.

(5)Members of our Strategy Committee. Dr. Brien is Chairman of the Committee.

Steven A. Kriegsman has been CytRx's Chief Executive Officer and a director since July 2002. In October 2014, he was elected Chairman of the Board. Mr. Kriegsman served on the boards of directors of Galena Biopharma, Inc. from 2009 until 2016 and Catasys, Inc. from November 2013 to August 2015. He previously served as Director and Chairman of Global Genomics from June 2000 until 2002. Mr. Kriegsman is an inactive Chairman and the founder of Kriegsman Capital Group LLC, a financial advisory firm specializing in the development of alternative sources of equity capital for emerging growth companies in the healthcare industry. During his career, he has advised such companies as SuperGen Inc., Closure Medical Corporation, Novoste Corporation, Miravant Medical Technologies, and Maxim Pharmaceuticals. In the past, Mr. Kriegsman has also served on the Board of Directors of Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Hythiam, Inc. Mr. Kriegsman has a B.S. degree with honors from New York University in Accounting and completed the Executive Program in Mergers and Acquisitions at New York University, The Management Institute. Mr. Kriegsman is a graduate of the Stanford Law School Directors' College
Mr. Kriegsman was formerly a Certified Public Accountant with KPMG in New York City. In February 2006, Mr. Kriegsman received the Corporate Philanthropist of the Year Award from the Greater Los Angeles Chapter of the ALS Association and in October 2006, he received the Lou Gehrig Memorial Corporate Award from the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Mr. Kriegsman has been a guest speaker and lecturer at various universities including California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Brown University, and New York University. He also was an instructor at York College in Jamaica (Queens), NY, where he taught business to a diverse group of students in York's adult education program. Mr. Kriegsman has been active in various charitable organizations including the Biotechnology Industry Organization, the California Health Institute, the ALS Association, the Los Angeles Venture Association, the Southern California Biomedical Council, the American Association of Dance Companies and the Palisades-Malibu YMCA.
Mr. Kriegsman's extensive history as a member of management is vital to the board of directors' collective knowledge of our day-to-day operations. Mr. Kriegsman also provides great insight as to how CytRx grew as an organization and his institutional knowledge is an invaluable asset to the board of directors in effecting its oversight of CytRx's strategic plans. Mr. Kriegsman's presence on the board of directors also allows for a flow of information and ideas between the board of directors and management.

Louis Ignarro, Ph.D. has been a director since July 2002.2002 and was appointed Chairman of the Board on January 3, 2022. He previously served as a director of Global Genomics from November 2000 until 2002. Dr. Ignarro received the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1998. Dr. Ignarro serves as the Jerome J. Belzer, M.D. Distinguished Professor of Pharmacology in the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology at the UCLA School of Medicine. Retired in 2013, Dr. Ignarro had been at the UCLA School of Medicine since 1985 as a professor, acting chairman and assistant dean. Dr. Ignarro received the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1998.

Dr. Ignarro received a B.S. in pharmacy from Columbia University and his Ph.D. in Pharmacology from the University of Minnesota. Dr. Ignarro is a Nobel Laureate and an esteemed medical researcher whose experience enables him to offer importance scientific guidance to our Board of Directors. In December 2016, Dr. Ignarro was appointed Lead Director.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #41#


has agreed to not stand for re-election at the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Joel Caldwell joined our Board of Directors on July 12, 2017. HeMr. Caldwell brings more than 30 years of experience in tax matters, finance, and internal auditing. HeMr. Caldwell retired from Southern California Edison, one of the nation'snation’s largest public utilities, where he had been employed for 28 years in various executive-level accounting and finance positions covering Internal Audits, Executive Compensation, Long Term Finance, Employee Benefits and, most recently prior to his retirement, Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Controls Compliance. He also worked in public accounting at the firm of Arthur Andersen & Co. In 1980, Mr. Caldwell earned his MBA with a major in finance from the University of California at Berkeley. Prior to that, heMr. Caldwell received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and Finance, also from the University of California at Berkeley. HeMr. Caldwell has been a Certified Public Accountant in California since 1982 and a Certified Internal Auditor since 1986. Mr. Caldwell volunteers his business skills, serving as a financial advisor on the board of trustees of a charitable organization, and continues his involvement with track and field sports by volunteering as a meet official at Pacific Palisades Charter High School. HeMr. Caldwell is a member of both the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public Accountants.

Mr. Caldwell's Caldwell was appointed Lead Director on January 3, 2022.

Mr. Caldwell’s diverse background in accounting, auditing and finance, along with his accreditation as a member of both the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public Accountants will provide the board with a balanced perspective to enhance its stewardship and fulfill his role as the named financial expert on our Audit Committee.

Earl Brien, M.D.

Jennifer Simpson, Ph.D. joined our board of directors in December 2016. He isJuly 2021. Dr. Simpson serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a renowned orthopedicmember of the board of directors of Panbela Therapeutics since July 2020. She most recently served as President and sarcoma surgeon whoChief Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of Delcath Systems, Inc. from 2015 to June 2020. She had previously held various other leadership roles at Delcath since 2012. From 2011 to 2012, Dr. Simpson served as Vice President, Global Marketing, Oncology Brand Lead at ImClone Systems, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), where she was responsible for all product commercialization activities and launch preparation for one of the late-stage assets. From 2009 to 2011, Dr. Simpson served as Vice President, Product Champion and from 2008 to 2009 as the Associate Vice President, Product Champion for ImClone’s product Ramucirumab. From 2006 to 2008, Dr. Simpson served as Product Director, Oncology Therapeutics Marketing at Ortho Biotech (now Janssen Biotech), a Pennsylvania-based biotech company that focuses on innovative solutions in immunology, oncology and nephrology. Earlier in her career, Dr. Simpson spent over a decade as a hematology/oncology nurse practitioner and educator. Dr. Simpson has served on the board of directors and nominating and corporate governance committee of Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since August 2019. has been a director since July 2002 and has served as a Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and as the Surgical DirectorChairman of the Sarcoma Service at Cedars Sinai Medical CenterBoard’s Compensation Committee since December 2016. Dr. Simpson’s experience in Los Angeles, California since February 2008. After completing his matriculation as a Fellow at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centerthe field of clinical development and oncology will be very helpful to the Board and the Hospital for Special SurgeryCompany.

49

Stephen Snowdy, Ph.D. was appointed Chief Executive Officer on January 3, 2022, effective January 10, 2022. Dr. Snowdy is a scientist, serial entrepreneur and medical venture capitalist with two decades of experience in musculoskeletal tumorslife science investing and metabolic bone disease respectively,executive management. Dr. Snowdy joins from Visioneering Technologies, Inc. (ASX: VTI), where he became the Director of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Programwas Chief Executive Officer and Metabolic Bone Disease Center at Orthopedic Hospital.Executive Director. Dr. Brien is the recipient of numerous grants, with an extensive bibliography of peer-reviewed articles spanning more than twenty years to his credit. He has also represented at national and international meetings for the past twenty years. From 1993 until 2004, heSnowdy previously served as Chief Executive Officer at Abby Med LLC, a start-up pharmaceutical company dedicated to the Cancer Commissiondevelopment of a novel class of cancer drugs. Prior to that, Dr. Snowdy was Chairman and Cancer Liaison PhysicianChief Executive Officer of Calosyn Pharma, Inc., a Phase 2 osteoarthritis company, and was a partner for several years at a top-tier medical venture capital firm. Dr. Snowdy simultaneously earned a PhD in Neurobiology and an MBA from the American CollegeUniversity of Surgeons Commission on CancerNorth Carolina. Dr. Snowdy studied Chemical Engineering and Chemistry at Orthopedic Hospital.

the University of Florida, where he also completed two years of postbaccalaureate study in cardiopharmacology. His academic training followed service in the United States Navy Special Forces.

John Y. Caloz joined us in October 2007 as our Chief Accounting Officer. In January of 2009, Mr. Caloz was named Chief Financial Officer. HeOfficer and in August of 2020 was appointed Senior Vice-President. Mr. Caloz has a history of providing senior financial leadership in the life sciences sector, as Chief Financial Officer of Occulogix, Inc, a NASDAQ listed, medical therapy company. Prior to that, Mr. Caloz served as Chief Financial Officer of IRIS International Inc., a Chatsworth, CA based medical device manufacturer. HeMr. Caloz served as Chief Financial Officer of San Francisco-based Synarc, Inc., a medical imaging company, and from 1993 to 1999 he was Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Phoenix International Life Sciences Inc. of Montreal, Canada, which was acquired by MDS Inc. in 1999. Mr. Caloz was a partner at Rooney, Greig, Whitrod, Filion & Associates of Saint Laurent, Quebec, Canada, a firm of Chartered Accountants specializing in research and development and high-tech companies from 1983 to 1993.1993, Mr. Caloz, a Chartered Professional Accountant and Chartered Accountant, holds a degree in Accounting from York University, Toronto, Canada.

Felix Kratz, Ph.D. joined CytRx in 2014 as Vice President, Drug Discovery. He is a medicinal chemist with more than 25 years of pertinent experience in the preclinical development of anticancer drugs, prodrugs

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors and protein conjugation chemistry and profound knowledge of translational research from the laboratory to the clinic. He has successfully transferred aldoxorubicin, CytRx clinical lead compound, from bench to bedside that is based on an innovative drug delivery platform exploiting circulating albumin as a tumor-specific drug carrier. Felix Kratz graduated in Chemistry from the University of Heidelberg with Magna Cum Laude. Prior to joining CytRx Corporation he established the Division of Macromolecular Prodrugs at the Tumor Biology Center Freiburg. He serves on the Editorial Board for Bioconjugate Chemistry, Current Medicinal Chemistry, Current Bioactive Compounds, and Pharmacology & Pharmacy and has authored approximately 260 scientific publications, book articles and proceedings and is the inventor of over 20 patents and patent applications. He heads the CytRx Drug Discovery Branch located in the Innovation Center Freiburg, Germany.

executive officers.

Diversity

Our board of directors acting through the Nomination and Governance Committee, is responsible for assembling for stockholder consideration director-nominees who, taken together, have appropriate experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills to function effectively as a board. The Nomination and Governance CommitteeBoard periodically reviews theits composition of the board of directors in light of our changing requirements, its assessment of the board of directors'its performance, and the input of stockholders and other key constituencies. The Nomination and Governance CommitteeBoard of Directors looks for certain characteristics common to all board members, including integrity, strong professional reputation and record of achievement, constructive and collegial personal attributes, and the ability and commitment to devote sufficient time and energy to board service. In addition, the Nomination and Governance Committee seeksthey seek to include on the board of directors a complementary mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills reflecting the broad set of challenges that the board of directors confronts. These individual qualities can include matters such as experience in our company'scompany’s industry, technical experience (i.e., medical or research expertise), experience gained in situations comparable to the company's,company’s, leadership experience, and relevant geographical diversity.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #42#


Corporate Governance

Board Committees,

Meetings and Attendance

Our business, property and affairs are managed by or under the direction of the board of directors. Members of the board are kept informed of our business through informal discussions with our chief executive and financial officers and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating at meetings of the board and its committees.

Our board of directorsBoard currently has four committees.two committees, the Audit Committee, in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Compensation Committee. The Audit Committee consists of Mr. Caldwell Dr. Ignarro and Dr. Brien.Ignarro. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is Mr. Caldwell. The Compensation Committee consists of Dr. Ignarro Mr. Caldwell and Dr. Brien; the Nomination and Governance Committee consists of Dr. Ignarro and Dr. Brien, and the Strategy Committee consists of Dr. Brien, Dr Ignarro and Mr. Caldwell. Such committeesDr. Ignarro is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee operate under formal charters that govern their duties and conduct. Copies of the charters are available on our website at www.cytrx.com.

50

Our board of directorsBoard has determined that Mr. Caldwell, one of the independent directors serving on our Audit Committee, is an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” as defined by the SEC'sSEC’s rules. Our board of directors has determined that Dr. Ignarro and Mr. Caldwell and Dr. Brien are "independent"“independent” under the current independence standards of both The NASDAQ CapitalOTC Market and the SEC.

In the year ended December 31, 2021, the Board met six times, the Audit Committee met four times and the Compensation Committee met once.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Each of our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding shares of common stock is required under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and to furnish us with copies of those reports. BasedTo our knowledge, based solely on our review of copies of reports we have received and written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that there was one delinquent filer. Dr. Simpson was deemed a director of the Company on July 29, 2021, and the Form 3 was not filed until August 11, 2021. Other than the aforementioned delinquent Section 16(a) report, we believe our directors and executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders for 2014the year ended December 31, 2021 complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, a copy of which is available on our website at www.cytrx.com. We will furnish, without charge, a copy of our Code of Ethics upon request. Such requests should be directed to Attention: Corporate Secretary, 11726 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California, or by telephone at 310-826-5648.

Board Leadership Structure

On October 15, 2014,January 3, 2022, our board of directors appointed Mr. KriegsmanDr. Ignarro as Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the Board presides at all meetings of our board of directorsBoard (but not at its executive sessions) and exercises and performs such other powers and duties as may be assigned to him from time to time by the board or prescribed by our amended and restated bylaws.

Our board of directors has no established policy on whether it should be led by a Chairman who is alsoby-laws. On March 9, 2022, the Chief Executive Officer, but periodically considers whether combining, or separating,Company announced that Dr. Ignarro will not stand for re-election at the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is appropriate. At this time, our board is committed to the combined role given the circumstances of our company, including2022 Annual Meeting.

In January 2022, Mr. Kriegsman's knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry and our company's strategy.  Our board believes that having a Chairman who also serves as the Chief Executive Officer allows timely communication with our board on company strategy and critical business issues, facilitates bringing key strategic and business issues and risks to the board's attention, avoids ambiguity in leadership within the company, provides a unified leadership voice externally and clarifies accountability for company business decisions and initiatives.  In December 2016, Dr. IgnarroCaldwell was appointed as an independent Lead Director to act as a liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors. The boardBoard will continue to assess whether this leadership structure is appropriate and will adjust it as it deems appropriate

appropriate.

Board of Directors Role in Risk Oversight

In connection with its oversight responsibilities, our board of directors, including the Audit Committee, periodically assesses the significant risks that we face. These risks include, but are not limited to, financial, technological, competitive, and operational risks. Our board of directors administers its risk oversight responsibilities through our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer who review and assess the operations of our business, as well as operating management'smanagement’s identification, assessment and mitigation of the material risks affecting our operations.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #43#


Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Executive Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring our executive compensation program philosophy and practices. Generally speaking, the Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers with the approval of our Board of Directors.
The Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that the total compensation paid to our named executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to the named executive officers are similar to those provided to our other officers.
The Compensation Committee operates under a formal charter, a copy of which is available on our website at www.cytrx.com that governs its duties and conduct.
At the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders on a non-binding, advisory basis, approved the compensation of our executive officers as disclosed in our 2017 proxy statement. Based upon the results of this stockholder advisory vote, the Compensation Committee determined to continue its compensation policies and procedures.
Throughout this Annual Report, the individuals included in the

Summary Compensation Table below are referred to as our "named executive officers."

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The components of our executive compensation consist of salary, annual and special cash bonuses awarded based on the Compensation Committee's subjective assessment of the achievement of corporate goals and each individual executive's job performance, stock option grants to provide executives with longer-term incentives, and occasional special compensation awards (either cash, stock or stock options) to reward extraordinary efforts or results.
The Compensation Committee believes that an effective executive compensation program should provide base annual compensation that is reasonable in relation to individual executive's job responsibilities and reward the achievement of strategic goals of our company. We use annual and other periodic cash bonuses to reward an officer's achievement of specific goals, including goals related to the development of our drug candidates and replenishment and management of our working capital. We use employee stock options as a retention tool and as a means to align the executive's long-term interests with those of our stockholders, with the ultimate objective of affording our executives an appropriate incentive to improve stockholder value. The Compensation Committee evaluates both performance and compensation to maintain our company's ability to attract and retain excellent employees in key positions and to assure that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of comparable companies.
Each of the corporate goals established and subsequently reviewed by the Compensation Committee results from a collaboration among our named executive officers, including the leadership of our Chief Executive Officer and the support of our principal legal, financial, clinical, medical, commercial and business development officers. The Compensation Committee's assessment of the relative contribution of each named executive officer is based on periodic reports to our full Board of Directors regarding the progress of these business accomplishments and the individual efforts of our named executive officers, and year-end consultations, which include discussions of performance reviews, with our Chief Executive Officer that are a normal part of the Compensation Committee's compensation determinations. The Compensation Committee employs no objective measure of any individual's contribution.
The bonus amounts awarded to our eligible named executive officers are a function of their office and total compensation relative to the total compensation of our Chief Executive officer, based upon their employee evaluations, and with consideration given to comparable companies for similarly-situated employees. The bonus amounts awarded to each named executive officer is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
Because of the size of our company, the small number of executive officers in our company, and our company's financial priorities, the Compensation Committee has not implemented any pension benefits, deferred compensation plans or other similar plans for our named executive officers.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #44#


Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
The Compensation Committee annually determines the compensation of our named executive officers. Mr. Kriegsman, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, typically attends all meetings of the Compensation Committee, except for executive sessions at which his compensation is discussed. At the request of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Kriegsman provides his assessment of the performance of our named executive officers, other than himself. Mr. Kriegsman also takes an active part in the discussions of the compensation of named executive officers other than himself and assists in the development of a review matrix of each executive's contributions to the goals of the company that forms the basis for some compensation determinations. The Compensation Committee grants due consideration to Mr. Kriegsman's assessments when making determinations regarding the compensation of our named executive officers. All Compensation Committee deliberations and determinations regarding the compensation of Mr. Kriegsman are made outside his presence.
Setting Executive Compensation
Based on the foregoing objectives, the Compensation Committee has structured the company's annual cash and incentive-based cash and non-cash executive compensation to seek to motivate our named executives to achieve our company's business goals, including goals related to the development of our drug candidates and management of working capital, to reward the executives for achieving such goals, and to retain the executives. In doing so, the Compensation Committee historically has not employed outside compensation consultants or legal advisors. During 2017, the Compensation Committee used two industry compensation surveys in its compensation deliberations regarding cash and equity compensation for our executive officers. The surveys used were Radford Global Life Sciences Survey, which is a survey of public and private life sciences companies of all sizes, including those companies with under fifty employees and a survey of public and private companies in Los Angeles provided by salary.com (which the Compensation Committee uses to consider geographic differences in cost of living).
The Compensation Committee utilized this data to set annual salary increases and bonus amounts for our executive officers at levels targeted at or around the third quartile of compensation amounts provided to executives at comparable companies, considering each individual's experience level related to their position with us. The Compensation Committee has no policy regarding the use of benchmarks, and we have no established policy or target for the allocation between cash and non-cash incentive compensation.
The Compensation Committee is authorized to retain its own independent advisors to assist in carrying out its responsibilities, but has not relied upon outside compensation consultants or legal advisors.
Performance-driven Compensation
We emphasize performance in annually reviewing and setting our executive officers' base salaries, bonuses and equity incentive compensation. This emphasis on performance is intended to motivate our executive officers to pursue our corporate goals, reward them for achievement of these goals and align their interests with those of our stockholders.
Each year, we determine goals that we hope to achieve in the coming year, both on a company and individual basis. Our overall corporate performance as compared to these goals, and an individual's performance compared to his or her individual goals, primarily drive the recommendations that the Compensation Committee with respect to each executive officer's base salary, cash bonus and equity incentive compensation. Other factors, such as larger macroeconomic conditions of the industry and market in which we compete, as well as strategic business decisions and issues related to key employee retention, also influence compensation decisions.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #45#


Individual performance goals for each year initially are identified and developed by senior executives through a self-evaluation and goal-setting process, and our CEO refines and documents those goals in conjunction with the Compensation Committee. At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee reviews each performance goal and determines the extent to which we achieved such goals, and our CEO assesses the achievement of specific performance goals relating to our other executive officers.
In establishing performance goals, the Compensation Committee considers whether the goals could possibly result in an incentive for any executives to take unwarranted risks in our company's business and seeks to avoid creating any such incentives.
Company Performance Goals
For 2017, the Compensation Committee and our board of directors approved the following performance goals:
·Analyze the primary endpoint from the Phase 2 SCLC clinical trial;
·Completion of drug substance and drug product registration batches for aldoxorubicin;
·Meet with the FDA re 505(b)(2) NDA submission;
·Submit two ASCO abstracts;
·Identify an in vivo proof of concept for at least one ultra-potent albumin-binding drug candidate, and file provisional patent applications; and
·Raise additional capital.
For 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that, with the exception of the completion of registration batches for aldoxorubicin and the analysis of the Phase 2 SCLC clinical trial, both of which became no longer applicable with the execution of the licensing agreement with NantCell, each of the corporate goals had been achieved, and noted the particular contributions of executive officers to the achievement of those goals.
Individual Performance
The Compensation Committee reviews our executive officers' performance based on overall achievement of the corporate goals and a review of individual goals developed for each executive officer every year. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of our Chief Executive Officer, determines the relative achievement of the performance goals applicable to each executive officer, and assigns a performance rating based on a set of criteria set forth in an evaluation form. No specific formula is used with respect to setting any particular element of compensation based on the individual performance metrics. The score assigned to each officer was based on a subjective assessment by our Compensation Committee members of the officer's performance against the scoring standards of:
5 – Consistently Exceeds Expectations
4 – Sometimes Exceeds Expectations
3 – Meets Expectations
2 – Sometimes Meets Expectations
1 – Needs Improvement
The numerical job scores, with a 5.0 being the best and 1.0 being the worst, are determined based on an initial self-assessment by the officer, which is subject to change based on an evaluation of the self-assessment by the officer's direct supervisor and on the Compensation Committee's own assessment of the officer's job performance.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #46#


For 2017, our Compensation Committee determined that the individual performance scores indicated below were merited by the officer's respective contributions to our key business achievements discussed above, as well as the performance of their day-to-day responsibilities. On an officer-by-officer basis, our Compensation Committee also considered the following:
Mr. Kriegsman's individual performance goals relate primarily to overall corporate objectives, including building stockholder value as reflected in our market capitalization and our working capital, managing and directing the executive management team, and successfully developing our company's operations and personnel for future success. Based on those criteria, and the fact the Company was able to sign an exclusive licensing agreement with NantCell, the Compensation Committee gave a rating of 4.8 to Mr. Kriegsman.
Mr. Caloz's individual performance goals relate primarily to achievement of key financial objectives, such as managing and raising working capital, controlling spending, managing accounting personnel and maintaining regulatory compliance. Based on those criteria, the Compensation Committee noted Mr. Caloz's role in obtaining needed working capital, his efforts to control expenditures, the continued improvement of our accounting department, and our compliance with filing deadlines, and gave a rating of 4.7 to Mr. Caloz.
Dr. Kratz's individual performance goals relate primarily to the execution of the objectives related to our drug discovery unit, including identifying at least one ultra-potent albumin-binding drug candidate, managing the drug discovery laboratory within budget and maintaining a strong scientific team. Based on those criteria, the Compensation Committee gave a rating of 4.0 to Dr. Kratz.
2017 Executive Compensation Components
For 2017, as in recent years, the principal components of compensation for the named executive officers were:
·base salary;
·annual bonuses; and
·equity incentive compensation.
Base Salary
We provide named executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Generally, the base salary element of compensation is used to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of each named executive officer, and reflects our executive officers' overall sustained performance and contributions to our business.
During its review of base salaries for executives, the Compensation Committee primarily considers:
·the negotiated terms of each executive's employment agreement, if any;
·each executive's individual performance;
·an internal review of the executive's compensation, both individually and relative to other named executive officers; and
·to a lesser extent, base salaries paid by comparable companies.
Salary levels are typically considered annually as part of our company's performance review process, as well as upon a change in job responsibility. Merit-based increases to salaries are based on our company's available resources and the Compensation Committee's assessment of the individual's performance. This assessment is based upon written evaluations of such criteria as job knowledge, communication, problem solving, initiative, goal-setting, and expense management. In 2017, the Compensation Committee considered our successful achievement or substantial progress towards our corporate performance goals, and with consideration of the challenging financial environment, awarded no increases in base salary for 2018. Base salaries were also reviewed in light of the Radford and salary.com survey data to validate that they were within acceptable ranges based on market salaries.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #47#



Annual and Special Bonuses
As we do not generate significant revenue and have not commercially released any products, the Compensation Committee bases its discretionary annual bonus awards on the achievement of corporate and individual goals, efforts related to extraordinary transactions, effective fund-raising efforts, effective management of personnel and capital resources, and bonuses paid by comparable companies, among other criteria. Mr. Kriegsman's employment agreement entitles him to an annual cash bonus in an amount to be determined in our discretion, but not less than $150,000. Any cash bonuses to our other named executive officers are entirely in our discretion.
During 2017, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Kriegsman an annual cash bonus of $150,000, and granted the other named executive officers ranging from $75,000 to $100,000, principally based on their efforts in achieving the Company's corporate goals. In December 2017, the Compensation Committee approved an award to Mr. Kriegsman of a $0.7 million restricted stock grant, or 387,597 shares of our common stock based on the closing price of the Company's common stock at December 15th, the award date to vest in three equal annual installments.
Equity Incentive Compensation
We believe that strong long-term corporate performance is achieved with a corporate culture that encourages a long-term focus by our executive officers through the use of equity awards, the value of which depends on our stock performance. We have established equity incentive plans to provide all of our employees, including our executive officers, with incentives to help align those employees' interests with the interests of our stockholders and to enable them to participate in the long-term appreciation of our stockholder value. Additionally, equity awards provide an important retention tool for key employees, as the awards generally are subject to vesting over an extended period of time based on continued service with us.
Historically, equity awards have been granted annually at the end of each year based primarily on corporate performance as a whole during the preceding year. In addition, we may grant equity awards upon the occurrence of certain events during the year, for example, upon an employee's hire or achievement of a significant business objective such as positive results or other progress of our clinical trials or successful capital-raising efforts.
The Compensation Committee has established December 15 as the date for the annual grant of stock options. The December 15 date correlates to the approximate dates of our historical annual stock option grants, but otherwise was not based upon any particular methodology.  All stock option grants, other than initial stock option grants to new employees, are made at a meeting, whether in-person or telephonic, of the Compensation Committee and not by unanimous written consent, and the Compensation Committee determines the grantees, amounts, dates, and prices of all stock options and do not delegate these responsibilities.
No formula is used in setting equity award grants and the determination of whether to grant equity awards, or the size of such equity awards, to our executive officers; rather, it involves subjective assessments by our board of directors, Compensation Committee and, with respect to executive officers other than Mr. Kriegsman. Generally, annual equity awards are intended to encourage retention of experienced employees, and we consider individual performance and contributions during the preceding year to the extent our board of directors and Compensation Committee believe such factors are relevant. As with base salary and cash bonuses, for 2017 our board of directors and Compensation Committee also considered data from two surveys in determining equity award grants to our executive officers.
At a meeting of the Compensation Committee on December 15, 2017, the Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Kriegsman nonqualified stock options to purchase 208,334 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.75 per share, which equaled the closing market prices on December 15, 2017, the specified grant date. The options vest monthly over three years, provided that Mr. Kriegsman remains in our employ throughout such monthly vesting periods, unless Mr. Kriegsman's employment agreement is not renewed by us or by him upon expiration of its term on December 31, 2021, or his employment is terminated by us without "cause," or by reason of his "disability", upon FDA approval of aldoxorubicin, or by Mr. Kriegsman for "good reason," or due to his death. In any one of these events, the options will vest immediately and will remain exercisable for their full term. In addition, in connection with the annual review of our other named executive officers, at its December 15, 2017 meeting, the Compensation Committee granted to our other named executive officers nonqualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of 83,334 shares of our common stock. All of the stock options had an exercise price equal to $1.75, the closing market price on December 15, 2017, the specified grant date, and vest either bi-monthly over two years or monthly over three years, provided that such executives remain in our employ through such vesting periods unless, with respect to Mr. Caloz, his employment is terminated by us without "cause" or by reason of his "disability," or due to his death, in which cases the vested options will remain exercisable for their full term.
Generally speaking, we have not taken into consideration any amounts realized by our named executive officers from prior stock option or stock awards in determining whether to grant new stock options or stock awards. No named executive officers have exercised options since 2003.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #48#


Retirement Plans, Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the same group insurance and employee benefit plans as our other salaried employees. These benefits include medical, dental, vision, and disability benefits and life insurance.
We have adopted a tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan, our 401(k) Plan, for eligible U.S. employees, including our named executive officers. Eligible employees may elect to defer a percentage of their eligible compensation in the 401(k) Plan, subject to the statutorily prescribed annual limit. We may make matching contributions on behalf of all participants in the 401(k) Plan in an amount determined by our board of directors. We made matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan for 2017 of $78,000. Matching contributions immediately vest, as do all employee contributions. We intend the 401(k) Plan, and the accompanying trust, to qualify under Sections 401(k) and 501 of the Internal Revenue Code so that contributions by employees to the 401(k) Plan, and income earned (if any) on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k) Plan, and so that we will be able to deduct our contributions, if any, when made. The trustee under the 401(k) Plan, at the direction of each participant, may invest the assets of the 401(k) Plan in any of a number of investment options.
We generally do not provide any of our named executive officers with any other perquisites or personal benefits, other than benefits to Mr. Kriegsman provided for in his employment agreement. We are required by his employment agreement to carry a life insurance policy for Mr. Kriegsman in the amount of not less than $1.4 million under which Mr. Kriegsman's designee is the beneficiary. We purchased a policy with a face value of $2 million, for which we pay the premium, and Mr. Kriegsman immediately reimburses us for the premium relating to the $0.6 million of additional coverage. We periodically review the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our named executive officers. No changes to these benefits were made during 2017.
Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements
We have entered into written employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. The main purpose of these agreements is to protect the company from business risks such as competition for the executives' service, loss of confidentiality or trade secrets, and solicitation of our other employees, and to define our right to terminate the employment relationship. The employment agreements also protect the executive from termination without "cause" (as defined) and, in Mr. Kriegsman's case, entitle them to resign for "good reason" (as defined). Each employment agreement was individually negotiated, so there are some variations in the terms among executive officers. Generally speaking, however, the employment agreements provide for termination and severance benefits that the Compensation Committee believes are consistent with industry practices for similarly situated executives. The Compensation Committee believes that the termination and severance benefits help the company retain the named executive officers by providing them with a competitive employment arrangement and protection against unknowns such as termination without "cause" that go along with the position.
In the event of termination without "cause," the named executive officers will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to six months' base salary (24 month's base salary and minimum annual bonus under his employment agreement in the case of Mr. Kriegsman). The named executive officers' agreements also provide for our continuation of medical benefits during the severance period (including, for Mr. Kriegsman, payments for life insurance). If a named executive officer's employment is terminated by us without "cause" (or by Mr. Kriegsman for "good reason") within two years following a change of control of the company, the named executive officers will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to 12 months' base salary (36 month' base salary and minimum annual bonus in the case of Mr. Kriegsman), and Mr. Kriegsman also would be entitled under his employment agreement to receive a "gross-up" payment equal to the sum of any excise tax on termination benefits (including any accelerated vesting of his options under our Plans as described below) plus any penalties and interest.
On January 10, 2017, we entered into an amendment with Mr. Kriegsman, under which the term of his employment agreement was extended by three years to December 31, 2021. We agree in Mr. Kriegsman's employment agreement that if there is a change in control and his employment agreement is either not renewed by either us or Mr. Kriegsman or, following the expiration of the employment agreement, we terminate Mr. Kriegsman's employment other than for "cause" or he resigns for "good reason," he will be entitled to the lump-sum severance and continuation of benefits described in the preceding paragraph for a change in control.
We agree in the employment agreements with our named executive officers (other than Mr. Kriegsman) that if we do not offer to renew or extend the officer's employment agreement, and we had not theretofore terminated their employment, we will continue to pay the officer his annual salary thereunder during the period commencing upon expiration of his employment agreement and ending on June 30, 2019, or the date of his re-employment with another employer, whichever is earlier.
In the event we terminate Mr. Kriegsman's employment without "cause," Mr. Kriegsman resigns for "good reason" or his employment terminates due to his "disability" (each as defined in the employment agreement) or death, he will be entitled to full and immediate vesting of his restricted stock and stock options and any other equity awards based on our securities and all such awards will remain exercisable for their full term notwithstanding the termination of his employment (other than a termination by the company for "cause" or their resignation without "good reason").
Change of Control Arrangements
In addition to the severance and benefits payable to our named executive officers in the event of a termination of their employment following a change of control of the company, our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2008 Plan provide generally that, upon a change of control of the company, all unvested stock options and awards under the Plans held by plan participants, including the named executive officers, will become immediately vested and exercisable immediately prior to the effective date of the transaction. The Compensation Committee believes that such "single trigger" change of control policy is consistent with the objective of aligning the interests of the named executive officer's and of the company's stockholders by allowing the executives to participate equally with stockholders in the event of a change of control transaction.
The foregoing severance and change of control arrangements, including the quantification of the payments and benefits provided under these arrangements, are described in more detail elsewhere in this Annual Report under the heading "Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements and Potential Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control."
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #49#


Ownership Guidelines
The Compensation Committee has no requirement that named executive officers maintain a minimum ownership interest in our company.
Our long-term incentive compensation consists solely of periodic grants of stock options to our named executive officers. The stock option program:
·links the creation of stockholder value with executive compensation;
·provides increased equity ownership by executives;
·functions as a retention tool, because of the vesting features included in all options granted by the Compensation Committee; and
·helps us to maintain competitive levels of total compensation.
We normally grant stock options to new executive officers when they join our company based upon their position with us and their relevant prior experience. The options granted by the Compensation Committee generally vest monthly over the first three years of the ten-year option term. Vesting and exercise rights generally cease upon termination of employment (unless such termination is without cause or is a resignation for good reason), except in the case of death (subject to a one-year limitation), disability or retirement. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. In addition to the initial option grants, our Compensation Committee may grant additional options to retain our executives and reward, or provide incentive for, the achievement of corporate goals and strong individual performance.
On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee assesses the appropriate individual and corporate goals for our executives and provides additional option grants based upon the achievement by the new executives of both individual and corporate goals. We expect that we will continue to provide new employees with initial option grants in the future to provide long-term compensation incentives and will continue to rely on performance-based and retention grants to provide additional incentives for current employees. Additionally, in the future, the Compensation Committee may consider awarding additional or alternative forms of equity incentives, such as grants of bonus stock, restricted stock and restricted stock units.
It is our policy to award stock options at an exercise price equal to The Nasdaq Capital Market's closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant. In certain limited circumstances, the Compensation Committee may grant options to an executive at an exercise price in excess of the closing price of the common stock on the grant date. The Compensation Committee will not grant options with an exercise price that is less than the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, nor will it grant options which are priced on a date other than the grant date. For purposes of determining the exercise price of stock options, the grant date is deemed to be the first day of employment for newly hired employees. Among our corporate governance practices, we will grant stock options to directors, officers and employees only on pre-set dates established by the Compensation Committee prior to the fiscal year in which the options are to be granted.  The Compensation Committee has established December 15 as the date for the annual grant of stock options.  The December 15 date correlates to the approximate dates of our historical annual stock option grants, but otherwise was not based upon any particular methodology.  We also publicly disclose the method used to determine the pre-set stock option grant dates and any future changes thereto at least 90 days before they become effective.  All stock option grants, other than initial stock option grants to new employees, will be made at a meeting, whether in-person or telephonic, of the Compensation Committee and not by unanimous written consent, and that the Compensation Committee will determine the grantees, amounts, dates and prices of all stock options and will not delegate these responsibilities.
We have no program, practice or plan to grant stock options to our executive officers, including new executive officers, in coordination with the release of material nonpublic information. We also have not timed the release of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of stock options or other compensation to our executive officers, and we have no plan to do so. We have no policy regarding the adjustment or recovery of stock option awards in connection with the restatement of our financial statements, as our stock option awards have not been tied to the achievement of specific financial goals.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #50#


Tax and Accounting Implications
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
As part of its role, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides that corporations may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to certain individuals. We believe that compensation paid to our executive officers generally is fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
Beginning on January 1, 2006, we began accounting for share-based compensation in accordance with the requirements of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. This accounting treatment has not significantly affected our compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee takes into consideration the tax consequences of compensation to the named executive officers, but tax considerations are not a significant part of the company's compensation policy.
These policies remained in place throughout 2017, and we expect to continue to follow them for the foreseeable future.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
There are no "interlocks," as defined by the SEC, with respect to any member of the Compensation Committee. Louis Ignarro, Ph.D. and Dr. Brien served as members of the Compensation Committee for all of 2017. Anita Chawla, Ph. D. and Eric Selter served as members of the Compensation Committee in 2017 until July 2017. In July 2017, Joel Caldwell was appointed to the Compensation Committee when he joined the Board. 

Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and, based on such review and discussions, has recommended to our board of directors that the foregoing "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" be included in this Annual Report.
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.
Chairman
Earl Brien, M.D.
Joel Caldwell, CPA
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #51#



Summary Compensation Table

The following table presents summary information concerning all compensation paid or accrued by us for services rendered in all capacities during 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2021 and 20152020 by Steven A. Kriegsman and John Y. Caloz, who are the only individuals who served aswere considered our principal“named executive and financial officers duringofficers” for the year ended December 31, 2017; our one other most highly compensated executive officer who was serving as an executive officer as of December 31, 2017 and two former executive officers who would have been our other most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2017 but for the fact that they were not serving as executive officers on that date:

2021.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position Year  Salary ($)  

Bonus

($) (2)

  

Option

Awards

($)

  

All Other

Compensation ($) (3)(4)

  

Total

($)

 
Steven A. Kriegsman(1)                        
Chief Executive Officer  2021   850,000   150,000      6,013,700   7,013,700 
   2020   850,000   150,000      13,700   1,013,700 
                         
John Y. Caloz                        
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice-President  2021   400,000   100,000         500,000 
   2020   400,000   100,000         500,000 

 
Name and Principal Position YearSalary ($)  
Bonus
($) (1)
  
Option
Awards
($) (2)
  
All Other
Compensation ($)(3)
  
Total
($)
 
Steven A. Kriegsman               
Chief Executive Officer 2017 850,000   150,000   953,300   13,700   1,967,000 
  2016 850,000   150,000   1,388,750   13,700   2,402,450 
 2015 825,000   150,000   1,593,000   13,700   2,606,700 
John Y. Caloz                    
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 2017 400,000   100,000   77,000      577,000 
 2016 400,000   135,000   108,850      643,850 
  2015 375,000   135,000   477,900      987,900 
Daniel Levitt, M.D., Ph.D.                    
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Medical Officer (4) 2017 430,600   702,300         1,132,900 
   2016 625,000   512,500   124,400      1,261,900 
  2015 625,000   150,000   796,500      1,571,500 
                     
Scott Wieland, Ph.D.,                    
Senior Vice President – Drug Development (4) 2017 254,100            254,100 
  2016 400,000   50,000   46,650      496,650 
  2015 400,000   75,000   159,300      634,300 
                     
Felix Kratz, Ph.D.,                    
Vice President – Drug Development                    
  2017 222,400   76,000   33,000      331,400 
  2016 194,500   33,000   31,100      258,600 
  2015 182,000   49,000   119,500      350,500 


(1)Mr. Kriegsman’s resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer as of January 3, 2022.
(2)Bonuses to the named executive officers reported above were paid in December of the applicable year, with the exception of Dr. Levitt, whoyear.
(3)Mr. Kriegsman received a signing bonusSettlement payment of $6 million, which was remitted to the payroll service in December, 2021 and paid to Mr. Kriegsman on January 2017.3, 2022.
(4)$13,700 represents life insurance premiums.

51
(2)

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2021 issued under our 2008 Plan and our 2019 Plan:

Name Number of Securities Underlying Options Exercisable  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

  

 

Option Exercise Price ($)

  Option Expiration Date
            
Steven A. Kriegsman  208,334                 1.75  12/14/27
President and Chief Executive Officer  775,194(2)      n/a  n/a
   208,334       2.58  12/14/26
   166,666       14.64  12/14/25
   100,000       12.90  12/09/24
   154,167(1)      27.96  12/09/23
   12,363       14.76  3/07/23
   83,334       10.98  12/10/22
               
John Y. Caloz  350,000       0.26  12/12/29
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice-President  58,333       1.75  12/14/27
  58,333       2.58  12/14/26
   50,000       14.64  12/14/25
   33,334       12.90  12/14/24
   25,000(1)      27.96  12/09/23
   16,667       10.98  12/10/22

(1)
The values shown in this column representoptions were re-priced from $14.34 to $27.96 on June 1, 2015, with no change to the aggregate grantexpiration date fair value of equity-based awards granted during the fiscal year, inclusive of Mr. Kriegsman'soptions.
(2)Represents restricted stock award,fully-vested at December 31, 2021. On December 15, 2017, Mr. Kriegsman was granted 387,597 shares of restricted stock, which vest over three years in accordance with ASC 718, "Share Based-Payment." The fair valueequal annual amounts, and are now fully vested. On December 15, 2016, Mr. Kriegsman was granted 387,597 shares of therestricted stock, options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the assumptions describedwhich vest over three years in Note 13 of the Notes to Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.equal annual amounts, and are now fully vested.
(3)Represents life insurance premiums.

(4)Dr. Levitt and Dr. Wieland resigned in July and June 2017, respectively.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #52#


2017

2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

In 2017, we granted

No stock options andor restricted stock to our named executive officers under our were granted in 2021.

2008 Stock Incentive Plan as follows:

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name 
 Grant Date  
All Other
Option Awards
(# of CytRx
Shares)
  
Exercise Price of
Option Awards
($/Share)
  
Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock and
Option Awards
($)
 
Steven A. Kriegsman 12/15/2017   595,931(1)(2) $1.75  $953,300 
Chief Executive Officer               
                
John Y. Caloz 12/15/2017   58,334(1) $1.75  $77,000 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer               
                
Daniel Levitt, M.D., Ph.D.            
Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer                
                 
Scott Wieland, Ph.D.            
Senior Vice President – Drug Development                
 
Felix Kratz, Ph.D.
  Vice President – Drug Discovery
 12/15/2017   25,000(1) $1.75  $33,000 

___________________________________

(1)Options vest in 36 equal monthly installments, subject to the named executive officer's remaining in our continuous employ through such dates, except in the case of Dr. Kratz, which vest bi-monthly over 24 months, and except that in the case of  Mr. Kriegsman, the unvested options will vest, in full, upon termination of his employment by us without "cause", or by reason of his "disability" or by him for "good reason" or upon his death.
(2)Includes the award of 387,597 restricted shares of our common stock which will vest in three equal annual instalments.

2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2008the 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

The purpose of our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or 2000 Plan, and our 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2008 Plan, and our 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2019 Plan, is to promote our success and enhance our value by linking the personal interests of our employees, officers, consultants and directors to those of our stockholders. The 2000 Plan was originally adopted by our board of directors on August 24, 2000 and by our stockholders on June 7, 2001, with certain amendments to the Plan having been subsequently approved by our board of directors and stockholders. On May 11, 2009, our board of directors approved an amendment to the 2000 Plan to allow for a one-time stock option re-pricing program for our employees. The 2008 Plan was adopted by our board of directors on November 21, 2008 and by our stockholders on July 1, 2009 with certain amendments to that Plan having been subsequently approved by our Board and stockholders. The 2019 Plan was adopted by our board of directors and stockholders.on November 15, 2019.

52
2000 Plan and

2008 Plan Descriptions

The 2000 Plan and the 2019 Plan Descriptions

The 2008 Plan and the 2019 Plan, or the Plans, are administered by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors.Board. The Compensation Committee has the power, authority and discretion to:

·designate participants;
·
determine the types of awards to grant to each participant and the number, terms and conditions of any awardaward;
·
establish, adopt or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan; and
·
make all other decisions and determinations that may be required under, or as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or advisable to administer, the Plan.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #53#


Awards under the 20002008 Plan

The 20002008 Plan expired on August 6, 2010,November 20, 2018, and thus no shares are available for future grant under the 20002008 Plan.

Awards under the 20082019 Plan

The following is a summary description of financial instruments that may be granted to participants in our 20082019 Plan by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. The Compensation Committee to date has only granted stock options to participants in the 2008 Plan.

Board.

Stock Options. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. The terms of any incentive stock option must meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The exercise price of an option may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant, and no option may have a term of more than 10 years from the grant date.

Restricted Stock. The Compensation Committee may make awards of restricted stock, which will be subject to forfeiture to us and other restrictions as the Compensation Committee may impose.

Stock Bonus Awards. The Compensation Committee may make awards of stock bonus awards in consideration for past services actually rendered, which will be subject to repurchase by us and such other terms as the Compensation Committee may impose.

Limitations on Transfer; Beneficiaries. Stock Option awards under the 20082019 Plan may generally not be transferred or assigned by participants other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Awards of Restricted Stock or Stock Bonus awards may be transferred or assigned only upon such terms and conditions as set forth in the award agreement or as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.

Acceleration Upon Certain Events. In the event of a "Corporate Transaction"“Corporate Transaction” as defined in the 20082019 Plan, all outstanding options will become fully vested, subject to the holder'sholder’s consent with respect to incentive stock options, and exercisable and all restrictions on all outstanding awards will lapse. Unless the surviving or acquiring entity assumes the awards in the Corporate Transaction or the stock award agreement provides otherwise, the stock awards will terminate if not exercised at or prior to the Corporate Transaction.

Termination and Amendment

Our board of directorsBoard or the Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, terminate or amend the 2000 Plan or the 20082019 Plan without stockholder approval; provided, however, that our boardBoard or the Compensation Committee may condition any amendment on the approval of our stockholders if such approval is necessary or deemed advisable with respect to tax, securities or other applicable laws, policies or regulations. No termination or amendment of the Plans may adversely affect any award previously granted without the written consent of the participants affected. The Compensation Committee may amend any outstanding award without the approval of the participants affected, except that no such amendment may diminish or impair the value of an award.

Holdings of Previously Awarded Equity
Equity awards held as of December 31, 2017 by each of our named executive officers were issued under our 2000 Plan and 2008 Plan. The following table sets forth outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017:
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #54#


2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

  Option Awards 
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
       
Name 
 Exercisable     Unexercisable  
Option Exercise Price ($)
  
Option Expiration Date
 
 Steven A. Kriegsman     (1)  208,334   1.75  12/14/27 
       President and Chief Executive Officer  129,199   (4)     n/a   n/a 
           69,445   (1)  138,889   2.58  12/14/26 
   111,111   (1)  55,555   14.64  12/14/25 
   100,000   (1)     12.90  12/09/24 
   154,167   (3)     27.96  12/09/23 
   12,363          14.76  3/07/23 
   83,334          10.98  12/10/22 
   23,810          13.02  12/11/21 
   17,858          42.42  12/14/20 
   17,858          44.10  12/10/19 
   7,143          15.54  11/21/18 
   10,715          48.30  4/07/18 
                     
John Y. Caloz     (1)  58,334   1.75  12/14/27 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  19,444   (1)  38,889   2.58  12/14/26 
   33,334   (1)  16,666   14.64  12/14/25 
   33,334          12.90  12/14/24 
   25,000   (3)     27.96  12/09/23 
   16,667          10.98  12/10/22 
   4,762          13.02  12/11/21 
   1,191          42.42  12/14/20 
   2,976          44.10  12/10/19 
   1,191          12.60  01/02/19 
   1,191          15.54  11/21/18 
   595          48.30  04/07/18 
                     
Felix Kratz, Ph.D.                    
Vice-President – Drug Discovery     (2)  25,000   1.75  12/14/27 
   8,333   (2)  8,334   2.58  12/14/26 
   12,500   (2)     14.64  12/09/25 
   10,000          12.90  12/10/24 
   16,667          24.90  3/14/24 

____________
(1)
These options vest in 36 equal monthly installments, subject to the named executive officer's remaining in our continuous employ through such dates. All stock options held by Mr. Kriegsman and Dr.
Levitt provide for (a) vesting, in full, of the stock options in the event of, and upon, FDA approval to market aldoxorubicin and in the event of the termination of his employment by us without "cause" or due
to his "disability," his resignation for "good reason" or his death and (b) the extended exercisability for their full term of all vested options in the event of the termination of his employment other than
a termination by us with "cause" or his resignation without "good reason."
(2)These options vest in equal bi-monthly installments, subject to the named executive officer's remaining in our continuous employ through such dates.
(3)The options were re-priced from $14.34 to $27.96 on June 1, 2015, with no change to the expiration date of the options.
(4)Represents restricted stock fully-vested at December 31, 2017. On December 15, 2016, Mr. Kriegsman was granted 387,597 shares of restricted stock, which vest over three years in equal annual amounts.


CytRx 2017 10-K Page #55#



Employment Agreements and Potential Payment upon Termination or Change in Control

Employment Agreement with Steven A. Kriegsman

On December 13, 2019, CytRx entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Mr. Kriegsman is employedpursuant to his continued employment as our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to a fourth amendment dated as of January 10, 2017 to his fourth amended and restatedOfficer. The employment agreement, as amended. The employment agreementamended, will expire on December 31, 2021,2024 but will automatically renew following the expiration date for successive additional one-year periods, unless either Mr. Kriegsman or we elect not to renew it.

53

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Kriegsman is currently entitled to receive a base salary of $850,000. Our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) reviews the base salary annually and may increase (but not decrease) it in its sole discretion. In addition to his annual salary, Mr. Kriegsman is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion, but not to be less than $150,000.

$150,000, and Mr. Kriegsman received a grant of fully-vested stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock in connection with the First Amendment (Mr. Kriegsman exercised these options in 2020). In addition, Mr. Kriegsman, during his lifetime, and thereafter to his heirs, is entitled to receive payments equal to ten percent (10%) of the gross milestone and royalty payments received by the Company from Orphazyme A/S (or its successor or assigns) in respect of Arimoclomol and certain covered diseases following the sale of certain assets relating to the Company’s molecular chaperone regulation technology to Orphazyme pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 13, 2011, less any applicable tax withholdings.

Mr. Kriegsman is eligible to receive additional grants of options to purchase shares of our common stock. The number and terms of those options, including the vesting schedule, will be determined by our board of directors (or its Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion. In his employment agreement, however, we have agreed that all stock options held by Mr. Kriegsman will provide for (a) vesting, in full, of the stock options in the event of, and upon, FDA approval to market aldoxorubicin and in the event of the termination of Mr. Kriegsman's employment by us without "cause" or due to his "disability," his resignation for "good reason" or his death and (b) ) the extended exercisability for their full term of all vested options in the event of the termination of his employment by us without "cause,"“cause,” his resignation for "good“good reason," due to his disability or his death.

In Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s employment agreement, we have agreed that, if he is made a party, or threatened to be made a party, to a suit or proceeding by reason of his service to us, we will indemnify and hold him harmless from all costs and expenses to the fullest extent permitted or authorized by our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or any resolution of our board of directors, to the extent not inconsistent with Delaware law. We also have agreed to advance to Mr. Kriegsman such costs and expenses upon his request if he undertakes to repay such advances if it ultimately is determined that he is not entitled to indemnification with respect to the same. These employment agreement provisions are not exclusive of any other rights to indemnification to which Mr. Kriegsman may be entitled and are in addition to any rights he may have under any policy of insurance maintained by us.

If his employment agreement is not renewed by us or by Mr. Kriegsman, or in the event we terminate Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s employment without "cause"“cause” (as defined), or if Mr. Kriegsman terminates his employment with "good reason"“good reason” (as defined), in either case whether during or following the term of his employment agreement (i) we have agreed to pay Mr. Kriegsman a lump-sum equal to his salary and prorated minimum annual bonus through to his date of termination, plus his salary and minimum annual bonus for a period of twothree years (three years if such termination occurs within two years following a change of control of the company) after his termination date, or until the expiration of the employment agreement, whichever is later, (ii) he will be entitled to immediate vesting of all stock options or other awards based on our equity securities, and (iii) he will also be entitled to continuation of his life insurance premium payments and continued participation in any of our health plans through to the later of the expiration of the amended and restated employment agreement or twothree years (three years if such termination occurs within two years following a change of control) following his termination date. Mr. Kriegsman will have no obligation in such events to seek new employment or offset the severance payments to him by any compensation received from any subsequent reemployment by another employer.

Under Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s employment agreement, he and his affiliated company, The Kriegsman Group LLC, are to provide us during the term of his employment with the first opportunity to conduct or take action with respect to any acquisition opportunity or any other potential transaction identified by them within the biotech, pharmaceutical or health care industries and that is within the scope of the business plan adopted by our board of directors. Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s employment agreement also contains confidentiality provisions relating to our trade secrets and any other proprietary or confidential information, which provisions shall remain in effect for five years after the expiration of the employment agreement with respect to proprietary or confidential information and for so long as our trade secrets remain trade secrets.

On January 3, 2022 Mr. Kriegsman tendered his resignation as Chief Executive Officer. Upon his resignation, Mr. Kriegsman’s employment agreement was terminated.

54
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #56#


Potential Payment upon Termination or Change in Control for Steven A. Kriegsman

Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s employment agreement contains no provision for payment to him upon the event of a change in control of the company. If, however, a change in control (as defined in our 2000 Plan or our 2008 Plan)his employment agreement) occurs and within two years after the date on which the change in control occurs, Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s employment is terminated by us without "cause"“cause” or by him for "good reason"“good reason” (each as defined in his employment agreement), in either case, whether during or following the term of his employment agreement, then, in addition to the severance benefits described above, Mr. Kriegsman would be entitled to continued participation, for a period of thirty-six months that commences on the date of termination, of himself and his dependents in health plan benefits and with COBRA benefits commencing thereafter. To the extent that any payment or distribution of any type by us to or for the benefit of Mr. Kriegsman resulting from the termination of his employment is or will be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we have agreed to pay Mr. Kriegsman, prior to the time the excise tax is payable with respect to any such payment (through withholding or otherwise), an additional amount that, after the imposition of all income, employment, excise and other taxes, penalties and interest thereon, is equal to the sum of (i) the excise tax on such payments plus (ii) any penalty and interest assessments associated with such excise tax.

Employment Agreement with John Y. Caloz

John Y. Caloz is employed as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and TreasurerSenior Vice-President pursuant to an employment agreement dated as of February 26, 2018December 16, 2021 that is to expire on December 31, 2018.2022. Mr. Caloz is paid an annual base salary of $400,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or our Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion.discretion, but not to be less than $100,000. In the event we terminate Mr. Caloz'sCaloz’s employment without cause (as defined), we have agreed to pay him a lump-sum equal to his accrued but unpaid salary and vacation, plus an amount equal to six months'months’ salary under his employment agreement.

We agree in Mr. Caloz'sCaloz’s employment agreement that if we do not offer to renew or extend his employment agreement, and that his employment had not theretofore been terminated, we will continue to pay him his annual salary thereunder during the period commencing upon expiration of his employment agreement and ending on June 30, 2019.

Employment Agreement with Felix Kratz, Ph.D.
Felix Kratz is employed as our Vice President — Drug Discovery pursuant to an employment agreement dated as of March 16, 2017 that is to expire on March 15, 2018. Dr. Kratz is paid an annual base salary of 185,000 Euros ($222,400) and is eligible to receive an annual bonus as determined by our board of directors (or our Compensation Committee) in its sole discretion. In the event we terminate Dr. Kratz's employment without "cause" (as defined), we have agreed to pay him a lump-sum equal to his accrued but unpaid salary and vacation, plus an amount equal to six months' base salary.
We agree in Dr. Kratz's employment agreement that if we do not offer to renew or extend his employment agreement, and that his employment had not theretofore been terminated, we will continue to pay him his annual salary thereunder during the period commencing upon expiration of his employment agreement and ending on September 15, 2019.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #57#



2023.

Quantification of Termination Payments and Benefits

The table below reflects

In January 2022, in connection with the amountexecution of compensation to each of our nameda General Release and Separation Agreement, Mr. Kriegsman’s existing executive officersemployment agreement, as amended (the “Prior Employment Agreement”), was terminated; provided, however, that certain surviving customary confidentiality provisions and milestone and royalty payments as defined in the eventPrior Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. Pursuant to the Prior Employment Agreement and the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kriegsman received a lump sum cash payment equal to approximately $6.0 million. This amount was accrued in the Company’s financial results for 2021; however the payment was made in January 2022. In addition, Mr. Kriegsman will be entitled to receive continuing health benefits and life insurance premiums over the next six years at an approximate cost of termination of such executive's employment$43,000 per year. These future payments were also accrued in 2021.

Dr. Snowdy, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, is entitled to receive $250,000 should he be terminated without "cause"cause, or his resignation for "good reason," termination followingEmployment Agreement not be renewed and $500,000 should he be terminated upon a change in control and termination uponcontrol.

Mr. Caloz, the executive's death of permanent disability. The named executive officers are notCompany’s Chief Financial Officer, is entitled to any payments other than accrued compensationreceive $250,000 should he be terminated without cause, or his Employment Agreement not be renewed and benefits$500,000 should he be terminated upon a change in the event of their voluntary resignation. The amounts shown in the table below assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2017, and thus includes amounts earned through such time, and are estimates only of the amounts that would be payable to the executives. The actual amounts to be paid will be determined upon the occurrence of the events indicated.


Termination Payments and Benefits

  Termination w/o Cause or, for Mr. Kriegsman, for Good Reason          
Name 
 Benefit
Before Change in
Control ($)
  
After Change
in
Control ($)
  Death ($)  Disability ($)  
Change in
Control ($)
 
Steven A. Kriegsman Severance Payment (4) 4,250,000   4,250,000   1,700,000   1,700,000    
Chief Executive Officer Stock Options (1)              
  Health Insurance (2) 89,500   134,200   89,500   89,500    
  Life Insurance (2) 27,400   41,100      27,400    
  Bonus 750,000   750,000   300,000   300,000    
  Tax Gross Up (3)              
                     
John Y. Caloz Severance Payment (4) 200,000   400,000          
Chief Financial Officer Stock Options (1)              
  Health Insurance       21,500   21,500    
                     
Felix Kratz, Ph.D. Severance Payment (4) 111,000   222,000          
Vice President, Drug Discovery Stock Options (1)                   
____________
 (1)Represents the aggregate value of stock options that vest and become exercisable immediately upon each of the triggering events listed as if such events took place on December 31, 2017, determined by the aggregate difference between the stock price as of December 31, 2017 and the exercise prices of the underlying options.
(2)Represents the cost as of December 31, 2017 for benefits provided to Mr. Kriegsman for a period of two years, or in the event of a change in control, a period of three years.
(3)Mr. Kriegsman's employment agreement provides that if a change in control (as defined in our 2000 Plan or our 2008 Plan) occurs during the term of the employment agreement, and if, during the term and within two years after the date on which the change in control occurs, Mr. Kriegsman's employment is terminated by us without "cause" or by him for "good reason" (each as defined in their respective employment agreement), then, to the extent that any payment or distribution of any type by us to or for the benefit of Mr. Kriegsman resulting from the termination of his respective employment is or will be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we will pay Mr. Kriegsman prior to the time the excise tax is payable with respect to any such payment (through withholding or otherwise), an additional amount that, after the imposition of all income, employment, excise and other taxes, penalties and interest thereon, is equal to the sum of (i) the excise tax on such payments plus (ii) any penalty and interest assessments associated with such excise tax. Based on Mr. Kriegsman's past compensation and the estimated payment that would result from a termination of employment following a change in control, we have estimated that a gross-up payment would not be required. "Good reason" as defined in Mr. Kriegsman's employment agreement includes any change in Mr. Kriegsman's duties or title, as applicable, that are inconsistent with his respective positions. Mr. Kriegsman's employment agreement provides that, if the employment agreement is not renewed by us or by Mr. Kriegsman upon the expiration of its term on December 31, 2021, Mr. Kriegsman will be entitled to the termination payments and benefits described above.
(4)Severance payments are prescribed by our employment agreements with the named executive officers and represent a factor of their annual base compensation ranging from six months to two years, except for Mr. Kriegsman, which is the later of December 2021, the expiry of his agreement, or three years.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #58#


Pay Ratio
  
   
Annual total compensation of the median employee for 2017 $81,000 
Annual total compensation of the CEO for 2017 $1,967,000 
Ratio of annual total compensation of the median employee to the annual total compensation of CEO for 20171:24.3 

The Company chose December 31, 2017 as the date for establishing the employee population used in identifying the median employee and used fiscal 2017 as the measurement period. The Company identified the median employee using a consistently applied compensation measure which includes annual base salary or wages, target annual performance-based cash bonuses, and long-term equity awards based on their grant date fair values. All U.S. and non-U.S. employees employed as of December 31, 2017 were captured. No cost-of-living adjustments were made. The annual total compensation of the median employee and the annual total compensation of the CEO were calculated in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K.

control.

Compensation of Directors

We use a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our board of directors. Directors who also are employees of our company currently receive no compensation for their service as directors or as members of board committees. In setting director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that directors dedicate to the fulfillment of their director responsibilities, as well as the competency and skills required of members of our board. The directors'directors’ current compensation schedule has been in place since December 2013. The directors'directors’ annual compensation year begins with the annual election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders. The annual retainer year period has been in place for directors since 2003. Periodically, our board of directors reviews our director compensation policies and, from time to time, makes changes to such policies based on various criteria the board deems relevant.

Our non-employee directors receive a quarterly retainer of $6,000 (plus an additional $5,000 for the Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation and Strategy Committees, and $1,500 for the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee), a fee of $3,000$4,000 for each board meeting attended ($750 for board actions taken by unanimous written consent), $2,000 and $3,000 for each meeting of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee attended, and $1,000 for each meeting of the Nomination and Governance Committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors who serve as the chairman of a board committee receive an additional $2,000 for each meeting of the Nomination and Governance Committee attended and an additional $2,500 for each meeting of the Audit Compensation or StrategyCompensation Committees attended. During 2017, we granted ten-year stock options to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock to our newly appointed non-employee director, Mr. Joel Caldwell at an exercise price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant. In December 2017, we also granted ten-year stock options to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock to each non-employee director at an exercise price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant. In addition, Dr. Earl Brien was appointed Chairman of the Strategy Committee, for which he was awarded an additional grant of 40,000 shares. The options vested, in full, upon grant.

55
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #59#


The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our directors other than our Chief Executive Officer for 2017:

2021:

Director Compensation Table

Name (1)

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (2)

Total ($)

Louis Ignarro, Ph.D., Chairman of the Board  123,250   123,250 
Earl Brien, M.D., Director  28,000   28,000 
Joel Caldwell, Lead Director  106,750   106,750 
Jennifer Simpson, Ph.D., Director  14,750   14,750 


Name (1) 
 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (2)
  
Option Awards ($) (3)
  
   Total
($)
 
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D., Lead Director  135,250   45,600   180,850 
Earl Brien, M.D., Director  97,450   106,400   203,850 
Joel Caldwell, Director  67,300   150,000   217,300 
Eric Selter, Director  42,250      42,250 
Anita Chawla, Ph.D., Director  24,250      24,250 
____________

(1)Steven A. Kriegsman doesdid not receive additional compensation for his role aswhen he was Chairman of the Board.Board in 2021. On January 3, 2022, Mr. Kriegsman stepped down as Chairman and Dr. Ignarro was appointed Chairman. Mr. Caldwell became Lead Director on the same date. Dr. Brien stepped down from the Board in May 2021. For information relating to Mr. Kriegsman'sKriegsman’s compensation as Chief Executive Officer, see the Summary Compensation Table above. Mr. Kriegsman resigned from his position as director on March 9, 2022.

(2)
(2)The amounts in this column represent cash payments made to Non-Employee Directors for annual retainer fees, committee and/or chairmanship fees and meeting fees during the year.
(3)          In July 2017, we granted stock options to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock to newly-appointed non-employee director, Joel Caldwell at an exercise price equal to the current market value of
               our common stock on the date of grant, which had an aggregate grant date fair value respectively of $104,400, and in December 2017, we granted newly-appointed Chairman of the Strategy Committee,
               Dr. Earl Brien stock options to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock on the date of grant, which had an aggregate grant date fair value respectively of $60,800, both calculated in accordance with
               FASB ASC Topic 718.
        The amount recognized for these awards was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, and reglect grants from our 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. In December 2017, we granted stock options to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock to each non-employee director at an exercise price equal to the current market value of our common stock on the date of grant, which had an aggregate grant date fair value of $45,600. The amount recognized for these awards was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, and reflect grants from our 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, which is described in Note 13 of the Notes to Financial Statements. Eric Selter and Anita Chawla both departed from the Board in July 2017, prior to the annual granting of stock options.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #60#




Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Based solely upon information made available to us, the following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 16, 2018[22], 2022 by (1) each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock; (2) each of our directors; (3) the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table under Item 11 who were serving as named Executive Officers as of March 16, 2018;[22], 2022; and (4) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the SEC rules. Shares of common stock subject to any warrants or options that are presently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2018[22], 2022 (which are indicated by footnote) are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the warrants or options, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The percentage ownership reflected in the table is based on 28,037,50138,801,442 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 16, 2018.[22], 2022. Except as otherwise indicated, the holders listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown, subject to applicable community property laws. An asterisk represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (7) Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (Common Stock)  

Percent of

Class

(Common Stock)

 
Named Executive Officers and Directors        
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.  598,404   1.5%(1)
Steven A. Kriegsman  3,643,731   9.2%(2)
Joel Caldwell  335,373   *(3)
Jennifer Simpson, Ph.D.  25,000   *(4)
Stephen Snowdy, Ph.D.     * 
John Y. Caloz  592,424   1.5%(5)
All executive officers and directors as a group (five persons)  5,194,932   12.8%(6)
         
5% Beneficial Owners        
ImmunityBio, Inc.  1,969,697   5.1%

  
Shares of
Common Stock
    
Name of Beneficial Owner 
 Number  Percent    
                      Named Executive Officers and Directors         
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.  174,212   *   (1)
Steven A. Kriegsman  1,552,819   5.5%  (2)
Joel Caldwell  60,000   *   (3)
Felix Kratz, Ph.D.  54,445   *   (4)
Earl Brien, M.D.  140,247   *   (5)
John Y. Caloz  163,588   *   (6)
All executive officers and directors as a group (six persons)  2,145,312   7.7%  (7)
             
                      5% Beneficial Owners            
NantCell, Inc.  2,469,697   8.8%  (8)
             
             
_______

1)(1)Includes 172,024167,857 shares subject to options or warrants.options.

(2)Includes 678,107933,198 shares subject to options or warrants.options.
(3)
(3)Includes 60,000 shares subject to options or warrants.options.
(4)
(4)Includes 54,44525,000 restricted shares.
(5)Includes 591,667 shares subject to options.
(6)Includes 1,777,723 shares subject to options or warrants.and restricted shares.
(7)The address of each of the below listed named executive officers and directors is the Company’s business address located at 11726 San Vicente Blvd, Ste 650, Los Angeles, CA 90049.
(5)Includes 130,000 shares subject to options or warrants.
(6)Includes 162,831 shares subject to options or warrants.
(7)Includes 1,257,406 shares subject to options or warrants.
(8)Includes 500,000 shares subject to warrants.

Equity Compensation Plans

The information required is incorporated herein by reference to Item 5 of this Annual Report relating to our Equity Compensation Plans as set forth on page 26.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #61#


38.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

Our board of directors

Although the Company is no longer listed on NASDAQ, our Board has determined that Messrs.Dr. Ignarro, BrienMr. Caldwell and CaldwellDr. Simpson are "independent"“independent” under the current independence standards of both The NASDAQ Capital Market and the SEC, and have no material relationships with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of any entity) that are inconsistent with a finding of their independence as members of our board of directors. Our board has determined that Messrs.Dr. Ignarro Brien and Mr. Caldwell also are "independent"“independent” for purposes of service as the members of our Audit Committee. In making these determinations, our board of directors has broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, recognizing that material relationships can include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, and familial relationships, among others.

Transactions with Related Persons

General

Our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, as appropriate, all transactions with related persons, in accordance with its Charter and NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

Charter.

Transactions between us and one or more related persons may present risks or conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest. Our Code of Ethics requires all employees, officers and directors to avoid activities or relationships that conflict, or may be perceived to conflict, with our interests or adversely affect our reputation. It is understood, however, that certain relationships or transactions may arise that would be deemed acceptable and appropriate so long as there is full disclosure of the interest of the related parties in the transaction and review and approval by disinterested directors to ensure there is a legitimate business reason for the transaction and that the transaction is fair to us and our stockholders.

As a result, the procedures followed by the Audit Committee to evaluate transactions with related persons require:

·that all related person transactions, all material terms of the transactions, and all the material facts as to the related person'sperson’s direct or indirect interest in, or relationship to, the related person transaction must be communicated to the Audit Committee; and
·
that all related person transactions, and any material amendment or modification to any related person transaction, be reviewed and approved or ratified by the Audit Committee, as required by NASDAQ MarketplaceOTC Market Rules.

57

Our Audit Committee will evaluate related person transactions based on:

·information provided by members of our board of directors in connection with the required annual evaluation of director independence;
·
pertinent responses to the Directors'Directors’ and Officers'Officers’ Questionnaires submitted periodically by our officers and directors and provided to the Audit Committee by our management; and
·background information on nominees for director provided by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors; and
·any other relevant information provided by any of our directors or officers.
·
In connection with its review and approval or ratification, if appropriate, of any related person transaction, our Audit Committee is to consider whether the transaction will compromise standards included in our Code of Ethics. In the case of any related person transaction involving an outside director or nominee for director, the Audit Committee also is to consider whether the transaction will compromise the director'sdirector’s status as an independent director as prescribed in the NASDAQ MarketplaceOTC Market Rules.
There were no related person transactions

In connection with Mr. Kriegsman’s departure, the Company and Mr. Kriegsman entered into a General Release and Separation Agreement, dated January 3, 2022 (see Item 7). The transaction was approved by the Board in 2017.

Applicable Definitions
For purposes of our Audit Committee's review:
·"related person" has the meaning given to such term in Item 404(a) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K ("Item 404(a)"); and
·"related person transaction" means any transaction for which disclosure is required under the terms of Item 404(a) involving us and any related persons.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #62#


December 2021.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

BDO USA, LLP,

Audit Fees

Weinberg & Company, or BDO, servesWeinberg, served as our independent registered public accounting firm and audited our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016.

Audit Fees
2020.

The fees for 2017 and 2016the year ended December 31, 2021 from BDOWeinberg for professional services rendered in connection with the auditsaudit of our annual consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and reviews of our unaudited quarterlyconsolidated financial statements and Form S-3 registration statements were $425,210approximately $130,000. The fees from Weinberg for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and $436,609, respectively.


reviews of our unaudited consolidated financial statements were approximately $117,000. The fees for Form S-3 registration statements were $12,000.

Audit-Related Fees

None.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed by BDOWeinberg for professional services for tax compliance tax advice and tax planning were $17,511 and $45,550approximately $30,000 for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

2021.

All Other Fees

No other services were rendered by BDOWeinberg in either 2017year ended December 31, 2021 or 2016.

2020.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

It is the policy of our Audit Committee that all services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, must be pre-approved by our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee pre-approved all services, audit and non-audit, provided to us by BDOWeinberg for 2017the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2016.2020.

58
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #63#


PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this 10-K:

(1)

(1) Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements and the related report of the independent registered public accounting firm thereon are set forth on pages F-1 to F-22F-24 of this Annual Report. These consolidated financial statements are as follows:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016

2020

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015

2020

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015

2020

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015

2020

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(2)

(2) Financial Statement Schedule

The following financial statement schedule is set forth on page F-24 of this Annual Report.
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Schedules

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the information is provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(b)

(3) Exhibits

See Exhibit Index to this Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

59
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #64#


CytRx Corporation

Form 10-K Exhibit Index

  Incorporated By Reference to 
Exhibit
Number
Description
 
Form
 
Exhibit
Filing Date
Filed / Furnished
Herewith
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 6, 2008, among CytRx Corporation, CytRx Merger Subsidiary, Inc., Innovive Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Steven Kelly8-K2.16/9/2008 
3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CytRx Corporation, as amended10-K3.13/13/2012 
3.2Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation8-K3.15/15/2012 
3.3Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Pursuant to Section 151 of the Delaware General Corporation Law8-K3.112/14/2016 
3.4Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation8-K3.111/1/2017 
3.5Restated By-Laws of CytRx Corporation, as amended8-K3.27/16/2013 
4.1Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement dated April 16, 1997 between CytRx Corporation and American Stock Transfer &Trust Company, as Rights Agent8-K99.14/17/1997 
4.1.1Amendment No. 1 to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated February 11, 200210-K4.24/1/2002 
4.1.2Amendment No. 2 to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated March 30, 200710-K4.34/2/2007 
4.1.3Amendment No. 3 to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated July 12, 201610-Q4.111/9/2016 
      
4.2Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by CytRx Corporation to Alexander Capital, L.P.10-K4.53/11/2016 
4.3Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by CytRx Corporation, dated July 20, 201610-K4.63/15/2017 
4.4Contingent Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement dated as of December 5, 2016 issued by CytRx Corporation to Bristol Capital Advisors, LLC on February 10, 201710-K4.73/15/2017 
4.5Warrant Agreement dated as of February 5, 2016 issued by CytRx Corporation to Hercules Technology Growth Capital, LLC8-K10.22/9/2016 
4.5.1First Amendment to Warrant Agreement, dated July 28, 2017, issued by CytRx Corporation to Hercules Capital, Inc. 8-K10.58/1/2017 
4.6Warrant Agreement dated as of February 5, 2016 issued by CytRx Corporation to Hercules Technology III, L.P.8-K10.32/9/2016 
4.6.1First Amendment to Warrant Agreement, dated July 28, 2017, issued by CytRx Corporation to Hercules Technology III, L.P. 8-K10.68/1/2017 
4.7Warrant, dated as of July 27, 2017, issued by CytRx Corporation to NantCell, Inc. 8-K10.38/1/2017 
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #65#


  Incorporated By Reference to 
Exhibit
Number
Description
 
Form
 
Exhibit
Filing Date
Filed / Furnished
Herewith
10.1.1*Amendment No. 2 to CytRx Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan14A (proxy)Annex C6/11/2002 
10.1.2*Amendment No. 3 to CytRx Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan10-K10.145/14/2004 
10.1.3*Amendment No. 4 to CytRx Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan10-K10.155/14/2004 
10.2*CytRx Corporation Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan10-K10.63/13/2012 
10.2.1*Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated CytRx Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
14A
(proxy)
Annex B5/5/2015 
10.2.2*Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated CytRx Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
14A
(proxy)
Annex A5/20/2016 
10.2.3*Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated CytRx Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
14A
(proxy)
Annex B5/20/2016 
10.2.4*Form of Non-qualified Stock Option for grants to non-employee directors under Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.10-K10.113/11/2016 
10.2.5*Form of Non-qualified Stock Option for grants to executive officers under Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.10-K10.123/11/2016 
10.3*Form of Non-qualified Stock Option for grants to Steven A. Kriegsman and Daniel J. Levitt, M.D., Ph.D., under Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.10-K10.133/11/2016 
10.3.1*Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreements of Daniel J. Levitt, M.D., Ph.D., dated December 31, 2015.10-K10.143/11/2016 
10.3.2*Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreements (2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan) of Steven A. Kriegsman, dated March 8, 2016.10-K10.153/11/2016 
10.3.3*Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreements (2008 Stock Incentive Plan) of Steven A. Kriegsman, dated March 8, 201610-K10.163/11/2016 
10.4†License Agreement, dated December 7, 2001, by and between CytRx Corporation and Vical Incorporated8-K9912/21/2001 
10.5Office Lease between The Kriegsman Capital Group, LLC and Douglas Emmett Joint Venture, dated April 13, 200010-K10.635/14/2004 
10.5.1Assignment, Assumption and Consent, effective July 1, 2003, by and among CytRx Corporation, The Kriegsman Capital Group, LLC and Douglas Emmett Joint Venture, concerning Office Lease dated April 13, 200010-K10.645/14/2004 
10.5.2First Amendment to Office Lease dated October 14, 2005, by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC8-K10.110/20/2005 
 10.5.3Second Amendment to Office Lease dated June 30, 2008, by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC 10-K 10.29 3/13/2009 
 10.5.4Third Amendment to Office Lease dated December 1, 2009, by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC10-Q  10.1 12/4/2009 
 10.5.5Fourth Amendment to Office Lease dated February 10 2014, by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC8-K  10.1 2/13/2014 

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #66#


     Incorporated By Reference to 
 
Exhibit
Number
 Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Filed/Furnished Herewith
10.6†License Agreement dated April 17, 2006 between Innovive Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH10-Q10.1511/14/2006 
10.6.1Amendment dated March 14, 2014 to License Agreement between CytRx Corporation and KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH8-K1.13/17/2014 
10.7*Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2017, between CytRx Corporation and Daniel J. Levitt, M.D., Ph.D.10-K10.263/15/2017 
10.8*Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2017, between CytRx Corporation and Scott Wieland10-K10.293/15/2017 
10.9*Employment Agreement dated January 10, 2017, between CytRx Corporation and John Y. Caloz10-K10.303/15/2017 
10.10*Employment Agreement dated February 26, 2018, between CytRx Corporation and John Y. Caloz   **
10.11*Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 10, 2012, by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman8-K10.110/19/2012 
10.11.1*First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman, dated March 4, 201410-K10.323/5/2014 
10.11.2*Second Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman, dated January 1, 201510-K10.313/10/2015 
10.11.3*Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman, dated March 8, 201610-K10.363/11/2016 
10.11.4*Fourth Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman dated January 10, 201710-K10.383/15/2017 
10.12*Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman, dated January 11, 201710-K10.393/15/2017 
10.13*Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman, dated January 30, 2018   **
10.14Loan and Security Agreement dated February 5, 2016 among CytRx Corporation, the Lender referred to therein, and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc., as Agent8-K10.12/9/2016 
10.14.1First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 28, 2017, among CytRx Corporation, the lenders parties thereto, and Hercules Capital, Inc., as collateral agent for itself and the lenders 8-K10.48/1/2017 
10.15†Exclusive License Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2017, by and between CytRx Corporation and NantCell, Inc. 8-K10.18/1/2017 
10.16Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2017, by and between CytRx Corporation and NantCell, Inc. 8-K10.28/1/2017 
23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP   **
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   **
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   **
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   ***
32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   ***
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #67#


    Incorporated By Reference to  

Exhibit

Number

 Description 

 

Form

 

 

Exhibit

 Filing Date 

Filed / Furnished

Herewith

2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 6, 2008, among CytRx Corporation, CytRx Merger Subsidiary, Inc., Innovive Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Steven Kelly 8-K 2.1 6/9/2008  
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CytRx Corporation, as amended 10-K 3.1 3/13/2012  
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation 8-K 3.1 5/15/2012  
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation 8-K 3.1 11/1/2017  
3.4 Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation 8-K 3.1 3/16/2022  
3.5 Certificate of Elimination of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock 8-K 3.2 12/19/2019  
3.6 Certificate of Elimination of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 3.3 12/19/2019  
3.7 Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 3.1 11/17/2020  
3.8 Amended and Restated By-Laws of CytRx Corporation, effective November 12, 2020 8-K 3.2 11/17/2020  
3.9 Certificate of the Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series C 10.00% Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 3.1 7/15/2021  
4.1 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2020, by and between CytRx Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as rights agent 8-K 4.1 11/17/2020  
4.2 Warrant, dated as of July 27, 2017, issued by CytRx Corporation to NantCell, Inc. 8-K 10.3 8/1/2017  
4.3 Form of Preferred Investment Option 8-K 4.1 7/15/2021  
4.4 Description of Securities       **
10.1* CytRx Corporation Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan 10-K 10.6 3/13/2012  
10.1.2* Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated CytRx Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan 

14A

(proxy)

 Annex B 5/20/2016  
10.1.3* Form of Non-qualified Stock Option for grants to non-employee directors under Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. 10-K 10.11 3/11/2016  
10.1.4* Form of Non-qualified Stock Option for grants to executive officers under Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. 10-K 10.12 3/11/2016  
10.1.5* Form of Non-qualified Stock Option for grants to Steven A. Kriegsman and Daniel J. Levitt, M.D., Ph.D., under Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. 10-K 10.13 3/11/2016  
10.1.6* Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreements of Daniel J. Levitt, M.D., Ph.D., dated December 31, 2015. 10-K 10.14 3/11/2016  
10.1.7* Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreements (2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan) of Steven A. Kriegsman, dated March 8, 2016. 10-K 10.15 3/11/2016  

    

Incorporated By Reference to

  

Exhibit

Number

 Description Form Exhibit Filing Date 

Filed / Furnished

Herewith

10.1.8* Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreements (2008 Stock Incentive Plan) of Steven A. Kriegsman, dated March 8, 2016 10-K 10.16 3/11/2016  
10.2† License Agreement, dated December 7, 2001, by and between CytRx Corporation and Vical Incorporated 8-K 99 12/21/2001  
10.3 Office Lease between The Kriegsman Capital Group, LLC and Douglas Emmett Joint Venture, dated April 13, 2000 10-K 10.63 5/14/2004  
10.3.1 Assignment, Assumption and Consent, effective July 1, 2003, by and among CytRx Corporation, The Kriegsman Capital Group, LLC and Douglas Emmett Joint Venture, concerning Office Lease dated April 13, 2000 10-K 10.64 5/14/2004  
10.3.2 Fifth Amendment to Office Lease dated January 13, 2020 by and between CytRx Corporation and Douglas Emmett 1993, LLC 10-K 10.3.2 3/24/2021  
10.4† License Agreement dated April 17, 2006 between Innovive Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH 10-Q 10.15 11/14/2006  
10.4.1 Amendment dated March 14, 2014 to License Agreement between CytRx Corporation and KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH 8-K 1.1 3/17/2014  
10.5 Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 13, 2011 between CytRx Corporation and Orphazyme ApS 10-Q 10.1 5/17/2011  
10.6 Exclusive License Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2017, by and between CytRx Corporation and NantCell, Inc. 8-K 10.1 8/1/2017  
10.7 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 26, 2019, by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman 10-K 10.18 3/29/2019  
10.7.1 First Amendment, dated December 19, 2019, to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 26, 2019, by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman 8-K 10.1 12/19/2019  
10.8* Employment Agreement, dated December 16, 2021, by and between CytRx Corporation and John Y. Caloz       **
10.9 CytRx Corporation 2019 Stock Incentive Plan 8-K 10.1 11/15/2019  
10.10 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2021, by and between the Company and the purchaser thereto 8-K 10.1 7/15/2021  
10.11 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2021, by and between the Company and the purchaser thereto 8-K 10.2 7/15/2021  
10.12 Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperation Agreement, dated September 2, 2021, by and between CytRx Corporation and Jerald A. Hammann 8-K 10.1 9/9/2021  
10.13* Employment Agreement, January 3, 2022, by and between CytRx Corporation and Dr. Stephen Snowdy 8-K 10.1 1/4/2022  
10.14* General Release and Separation Agreement, dated January 3, 2022, by and between CytRx Corporation and Steven A. Kriegsman. 8-K 10.2 1/4/2022  
21.1 Subsidiary List of CytRx Corporation       **
23.1 Consent of Weinberg & Company       **

    Incorporated By Reference to
 Exhibit
Number
Description  FormExhibit Filing Date  Filed/Furnished Herewith
101.INS++XBRL Instance Document.   **

Incorporated By Reference to  

101.SCH++

Exhibit

Number

DescriptionFormExhibit

Filing Date

Filed / Furnished

Herewith

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***
32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document.**
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.**
101.CAL++101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.**
101.DEF++101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.**
101.LAB++101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.**
101.PRE++101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.**
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL)

 
______________

*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**Filed herewith.
***Furnished herewith.
Confidential treatment has been requested or granted for certain portions which have been blanked out in the copy of the exhibit filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omitted information has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

62
++Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Registrant is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Registrant has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fails to comply with the submission requirements. These interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.

Item 16. SUMMARY

None
CytRx 2017 10-K Page #68#


SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Company NameCYTRX CORPORATION
Date: March 16, 201823, 2022By:/s/ STEVEN A. KRIEGSMANSTEPHEN SNOWDY
Steven A. Kriegsman
Chairman and

Dr. Stephen Snowdy

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:/s/ JOHN Y. CALOZ
John Y. Caloz
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ STEVEN A. KRIEGSMAN
Title
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2018
 Steven A. Kriegsman
 (Principal Executive Officer)Date
  
/s/ JOHN Y. CALOZ
Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2018
John Y. Caloz(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ LOUIS IGNARRO
Director
March 16, 2018
Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.
/s/ EARL BRIEN
DirectorMarch 16, 2018
EARL Brien, M.D.

/s/ JOEL CALDWELL
DirectorMarch 16, 2018
Joel Caldwell

CytRx 2017 10-K Page #69#


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


CytRx Corporation   
Report

/s/ STEPHEN SNOWDY

Chief Executive OfficerMarch 23, 2022
Stephen Snowdy, Ph.D.(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ JOHN Y. CALOZChief Financial OfficerMarch 23, 2022
John Y. Caloz(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ LOUIS IGNARRO

Chairman

March 23, 2022

Louis Ignarro, Ph.D.
/s/ JENNIFER SIMPSONDirectorMarch 23, 2022
Jennifer Simpson, Ph.D.
/s/ JOEL CALDWELLDirectorMarch 23, 2022
Joel Caldwell

63

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CytRx Corporation
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 572)F-1F- 2
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-2F- 4
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-3F- 5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ EquityF-4F- 6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-5F- 7
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-6
Financial Statement Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying AccountsF-22F- 8


F-1
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-iii#



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors and Stockholders

CytRx Corporation

Los Angeles, California

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CytRx Corporation (the "Company"“Company”) and subsidiary as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the periodthen ended, December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company atand its subsidiary as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the periodthen ended, December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have audited,been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in accordance withNote 1 to the standardsconsolidated financial statements, the Company has no recurring source of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as ofrevenue, has incurred recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows since inception and has an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2017, based on criteria established2021. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued byregard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the Committeeconsolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and our report dated March 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

F-2



/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Financing under security purchase agreements

As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $10 million and net proceeds of approximately $9.2 million related to the issuance of (i) 2 million shares of its common stock (ii) 8,240 shares of Series C 10.00% Convertible Preferred Stock; and (iii) an investment option that allows for the purchase of up to 11,363,637 shares of common stock for additional gross proceeds of approximately $10 million if fully exercised. The Company allocated the proceeds to the respective instruments on a relative fair value basis. In determining the fair value of the investment option, the Company used a Black Scholes Option Pricing Model, which uses certain assumptions related to expected life of the warrants, expected volatility, risk-free interest rates, and future dividends, to determine the fair value of the preferred investment option.

We identified the accounting and allocation of proceeds for the financing under the security purchase agreement as a critical audit matter because of the significance of the account balances, high estimation uncertainty due to significant judgements with respect to the selection of the valuation methodologies applied to determine the relative fair value of the investment option, and due to the complexity involved in assessing the classification and presentation of the common stock, the preferred stock and Preferred Investment Option. The auditing for these transactions required a high degree of audit judgement including evaluating the reasonableness of the significant judgements made by Management in determining the appropriate accounting.

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following, among others:

We inspected the security purchase agreements, and other relevant documentation.

We evaluated the Company’s conclusions regarding the application of relevant accounting guidance to the accounting for the security purchase agreement, including the classification and presentation of each respective instrument.

We evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s methodology for allocation of proceeds including the Company’s consideration of relevant accounting standards and reperformed the allocation.

We evaluated the reasonableness and appropriateness of the Company’s valuation models including testing the accuracy and completeness of such calculations which included an assessment of the data and assumption used by Management, such as expected life, expected volatility, the risk-free interest rate, and the dividend rate, and tested the mathematical accuracy of those calculations.

We developed independent estimates for the fair value of the conversion feature and preferred investment option issued based on the assumptions and data used by Management.

We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2004.

2019.

/s/ Weinberg & Company

Los Angeles, California

March 23, 2022

F-3
March 16, 2018

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-1#




CYTRX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $37,643,404  $56,959,485 
Receivables  7,529,032   183,703 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,914,077   3,434,238 
Total current assets  47,086,513   60,577,426 
Equipment and furnishings, net  1,042,892   1,959,667 
Goodwill  183,780   183,780 
Other assets  34,334   48,911 
 Total assets $48,347,519  $62,769,784 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $4,122,017  $6,406,445 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  8,029,274   3,830,498 
Deferred revenue  6,924,353    
Term loan, net - current  10,599,795   5,481,656 
Warrant liabilities  527,025   3,789,391 
Total current liabilities  30,202,464   19,507,990 
         
Long term loan, net     18,484,510 
Total liabilities  30,202,464   37,992,500 
Commitment and contingencies
 
        
Stockholders' equity (2016 restated to reflect a 1-6 reverse stock split, see Note 1):        
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 833,334 shares authorized, including 4,167 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock; no shares issued and outstanding      
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, stated value $1,000, 650 shares authorized of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares at $2.52 per share, 550 issued, 0 outstanding at December 31, 2017, 518 outstanding at December 31, 2016.     518,000 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 41,666,667 shares authorized; 28,037,501 and 18,553,817 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively  28,037   18,553 
Additional paid-in capital  468,969,445   440,106,726 
Accumulated deficit  (450,852,427)  (415,865,995)
Total stockholders' equity  18,145,055   24,777,284 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $48,347,519  $62,769,784 

         
  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
       
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $6,769,603  $10,003,375 
Insurance claim receivable  200,000   325,105 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,310,382   1,094,675 
Total current assets  8,279,985   11,423,155 
Equipment and furnishings, net  32,784   39,758 
Other assets  16,836   16,836 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  397,172   580,478 
Total assets $8,726,777  $12,060,227 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $1,470,652  $1,402,054 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,064,506   1,190,910 
Current portion of operating lease obligations  198,819   181,103 
Total current liabilities  3,733,977   2,774,067 
         
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion  216,381   415,200 
         
Total liabilities  3,950,358   3,189,267 
         
Preferred Stock, Series C 10% Convertible, $1,000 par value, 8,240 shares issued and outstanding  4,022,700    
         
Commitments and contingencies
  -     
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 833,333 shares authorized, including 50,000 shares of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock; 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively      
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 62,393,940 shares authorized; 38,780,038 and 36,480,038 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  38,780   36,480 
Additional paid-in capital  484,790,650   479,561,860 
Accumulated deficit  (484,075,711)  (470,727,380)
Total stockholders’ equity  753,719   8,870,960 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $8,726,777  $12,060,227 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-2#



CYTRX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Revenue:         
Licensing revenue $100,000  $200,000  $100,000 
             
Expenses:            
Research and development  19,840,106   35,930,212   43,395,574 
General and administrative  12,502,042   15,990,789   19,664,904 
Depreciation and amortization  629,312   536,631   317,649 
   32,971,460   52,457,632   63,378,127 
Loss before other income (expense)  (32,871,460)  (52,257,632)  (63,278,127)
Other income (expense):            
Interest income  365,584   255,123   233,958 
Interest expense  (3,831,211)  (2,754,677)   
Other income (expense), net  (16,322)  159,148   20,151 
Gain on warrant liabilities  1,367,777   3,827,617   4,437,628 
             
Loss before provision for income taxes  (34,985,632)  (50,770,421)  (58,586,390)
Provision for income taxes  (800)  (800)  (800)
Net loss $(34,986,432) $(50,771,221) $(58,587,190)
 
Basic and diluted loss per share
 $(1.46) $(3.78) $(5.82)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding  24,042,293   13,510,629   10,080,526 

  2021  2020 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Revenue:        
Licensing revenue $  $ 
         
Expenses:        
Research and development     799,577 
General and administrative  5,966,415   6,000,537 
Settlement with former Chief Executive Officer  6,096,597    
Depreciation and amortization  13,978   29,037 
Total operation expenses  12,076,990   6,829,151 
Loss from operations  (12,076,990)  (6,829,151)
Other income (expense):        
Liquidated damages expense  (1,109,653)   
Interest income  16,822   119,274 
Other income (expense), net  (6,842)  10,071 
         
Loss before provision for income taxes  (13,176,663)  (6,699,806)
Provision for income taxes     (800)
Net Loss  (13,176,663)  (6,700,606)
         
Dividends paid on preferred shares  (171,668)   
         
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(13,348,331)  (6,700,606)
Basic and diluted loss per share $(0.35) $(0.19)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding  37,584,695   

34,651,334

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-3#



CYTRX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


  Series B Preferred Shares Issued  Common Shares Issued  Preferred Stock Amount  Common Stock Amount  
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated Deficit  Treasury Stock  Total 
Balance at January 1, 2015     9,320,331  $  $9,321  $377,022,587  $(306,507,584) $(2,612,861) $67,911,463 
Issuance of stock options/warrants for compensation and services  
      
      7,384,656         7,384,656 
Common stock issued in connection with a public offering  
   1,744,167   
   1,744   26,778,324         26,780,068 
Options and warrants exercised  
   48,726   
   48   589,953         590,001 
Retirement of treasury stock  
   (33,213)  
   (33)  (2,612,828)     2,612,861    
Net loss  
      
         (58,587,190)     (58,587,190)
Balance at December 31, 2015  
   11,080,011       11,080   409,162,692   (365,094,774)     44,078,998 
Issuance of stock options/warrants for compensation and services  
      
      6,735,576         6,735,576 
Stock issued in connection with a public offering  
550
   6,685,362   
550,000
   6,685   25,220,572         25,777,257 
Warrants issued in connection with a public offering  
      
      (6,923,551)        (6,923,551)
Preferred stock conversion  (32)  76,191   (32,000)  76   31,924          
Issuance of restricted stock grant  
   387,597   
   388   1,937         2,325 
Warrants issued in connection with term loan  
      
      633,749         633,749 
Beneficial conversion feature – Series B preferred stock  
      (314,286)     314,286          
Series B preferred stock deemed dividend  
      
314,286
      (314,286)         
Options and warrants exercised  
   64,393   
   64   744,087         744,151 
Class action settlement share issuance  
   260,263   
   260   4,499,740          4,500,000 
Net loss                 (50,771,221)     (50,771,221)
Balance at December 31, 2016  
518
   18,553,817   518,000   18,553   440,106,726   (415,865,995)     24,777,284 
Options and warrants exercised  
   880,788   
   881   3,012,779         3,013,660 
Stock issued in connection with a public offering  
   5,000,000   
   5,000   13,946,218         13,951,218 
Preferred stock conversion  (518)  1,233,334   (518,000)  1,233   516,767          
Issuance of restricted stock grant  
   387,597   
   388            388 
Warrants repriced to term loan lender  
      
      76,549         76,549 
Shares issued in connection with licensing sale  
   1,969,697   
   1,970   6,073,677         6,075,647 
1 – 6 reverse stock split fractional shares  
   12,268   
   12   (12)         
Issuance of stock options/warrants for compensation and services  
      
      3,344,520         3,344,520 
Warrant liability exercises  
      
      1,894,589         1,894,589 
Banking fee on warrant exercises  
      
      (2,368)        (2,368)
Net loss                 (34,986,432)     (34,986,432)
Balance at December 31, 2017  
   28,037,501  $  $28,037  $468,969,445  $(450,852,427) $  $18,145,055 

                      
  Series B Preferred Shares Issued  Shares of Common Stock Issued  Preferred Stock Amount  Common Stock Amount  

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

  Accumulated Deficit  Total 
Balance at January 1, 2020     33,637,501     $33,637   479,197,849  $(464,026,774) $15,204,712 
Issuance of stock options/restricted stock for compensation and services              327,854      327,854 
Exercise of stock options     2,842,537      2,843   36,157      39,000 
Net loss                  (6,700,606)  (6,700,606)
Balance at December 31, 2020     36,480,038     $36,480  $479,561,860  $(470,727,380) $8,870,960 
                             
Issuance of common stock and preferred investment option     2,000,000       2,000   5,151,090      5,153,090 
Exercise of stock options     300,000      300   77,700      78,000 
Preferred dividend                 (171,668)  (171,668)
Net loss                 (13,176,663)  (13,176,663)
Balance at December 31, 2021     38,780,038      $38,780  $484,790,650  $(484,075,711) $753,719 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-4#



CYTRX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:         
Net loss $(34,986,432) $(50,771,221) $(58,587,190)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  629,312   536,631   317,649 
Loss on retirement of equipment and furnishings  424,049   12,276   2,614 
Gain on warrant liabilities  (1,367,777)  (3,827,617)  (4,437,628)
Amortization of loan cost and discount  1,923,816   587,837    
Stock-based compensation expense  3,344,520   6,735,576   7,384,656 
Non-cash litigation settlement due in common stock        4,500,000 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Receivable  (7,344,941)  4,412,097   (2,574,182)
Interest receivable     28,130   76,497 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,534,738   (28,569)  1,118,931 
Accounts payable  (2,286,416)  (1,672,631)  916,919 
Deferred revenue  6,924,353       
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  4,007,210   (5,862,861)  3,699,287 
Net cash used in operating activities  (27,197,568)  (49,850,352)  (47,582,447)
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Proceeds from matured short-term investments     35,035,420   76,544,319 
 Purchase of short-term investments        (65,958,146)
Purchases of equipment and furnishings  (134,598)  (1,020,441)  (331,328)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (134,598)  34,014,979   10,254,845 
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Proceeds from common stock issued in public offering, net of fees  13,951,218   25,777,257   26,780,068 
Proceeds from term loan, net     24,012,078    
Proceeds from sale of common shares and warrants related to NantCell  6,075,647       
Loan amendment fee payment  (200,000)      
Term loan principal repayment  (15,013,638)      
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants  3,202,858   744,151   590,001 
Net cash provided by financing activities  8,016,085   50,533,486   27,370,069 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (19,316,081)  34,698,113   (9,957,533)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  56,959,485   22,261,372   32,218,905 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $37,643,404  $56,959,485  $22,261,372 
             
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash financing/investing activities:            
Warrant liability exercises $1,894,589  $  $3 
Warrants repriced in connection with the sale of licenses $76,549  $  $ 
Receivable from issuance of restricted stock $388  $2,325  $ 
Equipment and furnishings purchased but not paid $1,988  $20,452  $485,743 
Retirement of treasury stock    $  $2,612,861 
Warrants issued in connection with the term loan $  $633,749  $ 
1 – 6 reverse stock split $12  $4,500,000  $ 
Series B Preferred stock beneficial conversion feature and deemed dividend $  $314,286  $ 
Warrants issued/amended in connection with the public offering $  $6,923,551  $ 
Series B Preferred stock conversion $1,233  $457  $ 
             
Supplemental disclosure of Cash Flow Information:            
Cash paid during the year for income taxes $800  $800  $800 
Cash paid during the year for interest $2,025,468  $1,959,375  $ 
             

         
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss from operations $(13,176,663) $(6,700,606)
         
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  13,978   29,037 
Loss on retirement of equipment and furnishings      
Stock-based compensation expense     327,854 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Insurance receivable  125,105   7,628 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (215,707)  (94,449)
Reduction of right of-use assets  183,306   201,103 
Accounts payable  68,598   189,114 
Other assets     (9,246)
Decrease in lease liabilities  (181,103)  (119,007)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  873,596   28,439 
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,308,890)  (6,140,133)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of equipment and furnishings  (7,004)  (25,902)
Net cash used in investing activities  (7,004)  (25,902)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        

Net proceeds from Security Purchase Agreement

  

9,175,790

    
Preferred stock dividend  (171,668)   
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options  78,000   39,000 
Net cash provided by financing activities  9,082,122   39,000 
         
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (3,233,772)  (6,127,035)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  10,003,375   16,130,410 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $6,769,603  $10,003,375 
         
Supplemental disclosures of Cash Flow Information:        
Recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets and obligations under ASC Topic 842 $  $715,310 
         
Reclassification of right-of-use assets, from prepaid expenses $  $66,271 
Insurance claims to offset accounts payable $200,000  $325,105 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-5#



CYTRX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Nature of Business

CytRx Corporation ("CytRx" or "the Company"(“CytRx”) is a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology. OurThe Company’s focus ishas been on the discovery, research and clinical development of novel anti-cancer drug candidates that employ novel linker technologies to enhance the accumulation and release of cytotoxic anti-cancer agents at the tumor. CytRx has an active drugDuring 2017, CytRx’s discovery and research operation at its laboratory, facilitieslocated in Freiburg, Germany, synthesized and tested over 75 rationally designed drug conjugates with highly potent payloads, culminating in the creation of two distinct classes of compounds. Four lead candidates (LADR-7 through LADR-10) were selected based on in vitro and animal studies, in several different cancer models, stability, and manufacturing feasibility. In addition, a novel albumin companion diagnostic, ACDx™, was developed to identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with these drug candidates.

On June 1, 2018, CytRx launched Centurion BioPharma Corporation (“Centurion”), a private subsidiary, and transferred all of its assets, liabilities and personnel associated with the laboratory operations in Freiburg, Germany.

In connection with said transfer, the Company and Centurion entered into a Management Services Agreement whereby the Company agreed to render advisory, consulting, financial and administrative services to Centurion, for which Centurion shall reimburse the Company for the cost of such services plus a 5% service charge. The Management Services Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time. Centurion is focused on the development of personalized medicine for solid tumor treatment. On December 21, 2018, CytRx announced that Centurion had concluded the pre-clinical phase of development for its four LADR™ drug candidates, and for its albumin companion diagnostic (ACDx™). As a result of completing this work, operations taking place at the pre-clinical laboratory in Freiburg, Germany would no longer be needed and, accordingly, the lab was closed at the end of January 2019.

We are a Delaware corporation, incorporated in 1985. Our corporate offices are located at 11726 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California 90049, and our telephone number is (310) 826-5648. Our web site is located at http://www.cytrx.com. We do not incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the information on, or accessible through, our website, and you should not consider it as part of this Annual Report.

LADR Drug Discovery Platform and Centurion

Centurion’s LADR™ (Linker Activated Drug Release) technology platform is a discovery engine combining CytRx'splatform for formulating cytotoxic cancer drugs that offer improved efficacy with reduced side effects. LADR combines our expertise in linker chemistry and albumin biology to create a pipeline of anti-cancer molecules that will avoid unacceptable systemic toxicity while delivering highly potent agents directlydeliver prodrugs to the tumor.  The Company has created a "toolbox" of linker technologies that have the ability to significantly increase the therapeutic index of ultra-high potency drugs (10-1,000 times more potent than traditional chemotherapies) by controlling the release oftumor environment and then activate the drug payloads and improving drug-like properties. After infusion, these ultra-high potency drug conjugates bind to circulating albumin for transport of the drug toinside the tumor. Subsequently, due to specific conditions withinSuch a trojan horse strategy reduces off-target side effects outside the tumor, the linkersthus allowing 10-1,000 fold higher dosing to be given.

The first-generation (“gen”) product candidate employing our tumor targeting and drug release system is aldoxorubicin, described below. Our next-gen products are cleaved and release the anti-cancer drug payload.


CytRx's current efforts are focused oncomposed of two classes of ultra-high potency drug conjugates.  The Company's strategy across these programs is to generate additional pre-clinical data that will allow them to make informed decisions regarding the selection of one or both programs for moving into human clinical trials either independently or on a partnered basis.

During 2017, CytRx's discovery laboratory synthesized and tested over 75 rationally designedalbumin-binding drug conjugates, termed LADR 7 through LADR 10. These drug conjugates combine the proprietary LADR™ linkers with highly potent cytotoxicnovel derivatives of the auristatin and maytansinoid drug classes. These payloads historically have required a targeting antibody for successful administration to humans. Our drug conjugates eliminate the need for a targeting antibody and two distinct classesprovide a small molecule therapeutic option with potential broader applicability.

Centurion’s postulated mechanism of compoundsaction for the albumin-binding drug conjugates is as follows:

after administration, the linker portion of the drug conjugate forms a rapid and specific covalent bond to the cysteine-34 position of circulating albumin;

F-8

circulating albumin preferentially accumulates at the tumors, bypassing concentration in other non-tumor sites, including the heart, liver and gastrointestinal tract due to a mechanism called “Enhanced Permeability and Retention”;
once localized at the tumor, the acid-sensitive linker is cleaved due to the specific conditions within the tumor and in the tumor microenvironment; and
free active drug is then released into the tumor.

Centurion’s novel companion diagnostic, ACDx™ (albumin companion diagnostic), was developed to identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with the four LADR lead assets.

On March 9, 2022, Centurion was merged into the Company.

Business Strategy for LADR™ Platform

Currently, the Company continues to work on identifying partnership or financing opportunities for LADR™ ultra-high potency drug conjugates and their albumin companion diagnostic. We have been created.  To date, four lead candidates have been selected basedconcluded all research and development on in vitroLADR and animal preclinical studies, stability,its companion diagnostic and manufacturing feasibility.  Additional animal efficacycontinue to focus on identifying partnership or financing opportunities.

Aldoxorubicin

Until July 2017, we were concentrating on the research and toxicology testingclinical development of these lead candidatesaldoxorubicin, which is underway.

the widely-used cytotoxin doxorubicin, modified with our LADR delivery and concentration system. Modifying doxorubicin with our LADR™ system allows for delivery of higher amounts of doxorubicin (3½ to 4 times) without several of the major dose-limiting toxicities seen with administration of doxorubicin alone.

On July 27, 2017, CytRxthe Company entered into an exclusive worldwide license with ImmunityBio, Inc. (formerly known as NantCell, Inc. ("NantCell"(“ImmunityBio”)), granting to NantCellImmunityBio the exclusive rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize aldoxorubicin in all indications, and itindications. As a result, our company is no longer directly working on development of aldoxorubicin.aldoxorubicin (ImmunityBio has recently merged with NantKwest, Inc.). As part of the license, NantCellImmunityBio made a strategic investment of $13$13 million in CytRx common stock at $6.60$6.60 per share (adjusted to reflect itsour 2017 reverse stock split), a premium of 92%92% to the market price on that date. CytRxThe Company also issued NantCellImmunityBio a warrant to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock at $6.60 over the following 18 months.$6.60, which expired on January 26, 2019. The Company is entitled to receive up to an aggregate of $343$343 million in potential milestone payments, contingent upon achievement of certain regulatory approvals and commercial milestones. CytRxThe Company is also entitled to receive ascending double-digit royalties for net sales for soft tissue sarcomas and mid to high single digit royalties for other indications. There can be no assurance that ImmunityBio will achieve such milestones, approvals or sales with respect to aldoxorubicin. ImmunityBio has initiated a Phase 2, randomized, two-cohort, open-label registrational-intent study for first-line and second-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, which includes aldoxorubicin.

F-9

Aldoxorubicin

Molecular Chaperone Assets (Orphazyme)

In 2011, CytRx sold the rights to arimoclomol and iroxanadine, based on molecular chaperone regulation technology, to Orphazyme A/S (formerly Orphazyme ApS) in exchange for a one-time, upfront payment and the right to receive up to a total of $120 million (USD) in milestone payments upon the achievement of certain pre-specified regulatory and business milestones, as well as single- and double-digit royalty payments based on a specified percentage of any net sales of products derived from arimoclomol. Orphazyme A/S is testing arimoclomol in three additional indications beyond ALS, including Niemann-Pick disease Type C (NPC), Gaucher disease and Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM). CytRx received a conjugatemilestone payment of the commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin that binds to circulating albumin$250,000 in September 2018. Orphazyme has announced it expects read-outs for its registrational trials in IBM and ALS in the bloodstream and is believed to concentrate the drug at the sitefirst half of the tumor. Aldoxorubicin, the Company's lead2021. Orphazyme has highlighted positive Phase 2/3 clinical candidate, has been testedtrial data in over 600 patients with various types of cancer. Specifically, itNPC and have submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is comprised of (6-maleimidocaproyl) hydrazine, an acid-sensitive molecule that is conjugated to doxorubicin.  The initial indication for aldoxorubicin is for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Aldoxorubicin has received Orphan Drug Designation (ODD)currently under Priority Review by the U.S. FDA forFood and Drug Administration (“FDA”) with a target action date of June 17, 2021. They also submitted a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) with the treatment of STS. ODD provides several benefits including seven years of market exclusivity after approval, certain R&D related tax credits, and protocol assistance by the FDA.  European regulators granted aldoxorubicin Orphan designation for STS which confers ten years of market exclusivity among other benefits.

In the first quarter of 2018, CytRx announced that NantCell was expanding aldoxorubicin' s use by combining it with immunotherapies and cell based treatments, specifically in metastatic pancreatic cancer and in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or non-small cell lung cancer.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-6#



Currently, the Company's only research and development activities are at its laboratory facilities in Freiburg, Germany. For this reason and others, its operating expenses are expected to be significantly lowerMedicines Agency (EMA). Orphazyme has established an Early Access Program in the near future. Therefore, periodU.S. as well as other select European countries. They also have established an Early Access Program in the U.S. as well as other select European countries. Orphazyme has also received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for arimoclomol for NPC. They recently announced arimoclomol will be marketed globally under the tradename MIPLYFFA™. CytRx will be entitled to period comparisons shoulda milestone payment of $6 million upon FDA approval and $4 million upon EMA approval, along with royalties and potential additional milestones.

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $13,176,663, utilized cash in operations of $12,308,890, and had an accumulated deficit of $484,075,711 as of December 31, 2021. In addition, the Company has no recurring revenue. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not be relied upon as predictiveinclude any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the results in future periods.


this uncertainty.

At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalentson hand in the amount of approximately $37.6$6.8 million. Under the termsThe continuation of the loan agreement, however,Company as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain necessary debt or equity financing to continue operations until it begins generating positive cash flow. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is requiredable to maintain cash equal to a minimum of the greater of three months projected cash burn or $10 million. Management believes that its current resources will be sufficient to fund its operations for the foreseeable future. This estimate is based, in part, upon the Company's currently projected expenditures for 2018 and the first three months of 2019 of approximately $27.8 million (unaudited), which includes approximately $1.5 million (unaudited) for its clinical programs, approximately $3.1 million (unaudited) for pre-clinical development of new high potency cytotoxic albumin-binding cancer drugs, approximately $0.7 million (unaudited) for general operation of its clinical programs, approximately $10.1 million (unaudited) for other general and administrative expenses and $12.4 million of interest and principal paymentsobtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our outstanding term loan. These projected expenditures are also based upon numerous other assumptions and subject to many uncertainties, and actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections. While these projections representoperations, in the Company's current expected expenditures,case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stockholders, in case or equity financing.

Current Business Strategy

Currently, the Company has the ability to reduce the amountsis working on identifying partnership or financing opportunities for LADR™ ultra-high potency drug conjugates and alter the timing oftheir albumin companion diagnostic. We have concluded all research and development expenditures as needed to manage its liquidity needs while still advancing its research and development objectives. The Company will ultimately be required to obtain additional funding in order to execute its long-term business plans, although it does not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide it with long term debt or capital. The Company cannot assure that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If the Company fails to obtain additional funding when needed, it may not be able to execute its business plansLADR and its business may suffer, which would have a material adverse effectcompanion diagnostic and continue to focus on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Effective November 1, 2017, the Company completed a 1-for-6 reverse stock split of the Company's outstanding shares of common and preferred stock, reduced its authorized shares of both common and preferred stock by one-sixth; no change was made to the per-share par value of the common stock. All share and per share amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split as if it had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.
identifying these partnership or financing opportunities.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"(“GAAP”).

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of CytRx Corporation and its subsidiary. All intercompany accounts are eliminated.

Revenue Recognition— Revenue consists of license fees from strategic alliances with pharmaceutical companies.

Since 2011, During the Company has followed the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codifications ("ASC") ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements ("ASC 605-25" to determine the recognition ofyears ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, no revenue underwas earned from license and collaboration agreements. The ASC provides guidance relating to the separation of deliverables including an arrangement into different units of accounting and the allocation of consideration to the units of accounting. The allocated consideration for each unit of accounting is recognized over the related obligation period in accordance with the applicable revenue recognition criteria. Revenue is considered realizable and earned when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection of the amounts due are reasonably assured. Amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in the Company's balance sheets. Amounts expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as current liabilities.
Other Income (Expense) — The Company realized a small foreign exchange loss in 2017, other income of $0.2 million in 2016 from a VAT refund, and a de minimus amount of other income in 2015.
fees.

Cash Equivalents— The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of amounts invested in certificates of deposit and money market accounts.

Equipment and Furnishings— Equipment and furnishings are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives (generally three to five years for equipment and furniture) of the related assets. Whenever there is a triggering event that might suggest impairment, management evaluates the realizability of recorded long-lived assets to determine whether their carrying values have been impaired. The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the non-discounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. Any impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. There are no impairment losses recognized

F-10

Insurance recoveries — The Company has several policies with insurance underwriters that provide for the recovery of certain costs incurred by the Company. The Company’s policy is to record any liability as incurred, and then to record the estimated recovery from the insurance company for that cost as a receivable in eachaccordance with terms of 2017, 2016 and 2015.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-7#


its existing policies. As of December 31, 2021, management has estimated that $200,000 is recoverable from its insurance carriers under the terms of its policies.

Fair Value Measurements— Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure the fair value. Level inputs are as follows:


Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2 – other significant observable inputs for the assets or liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.


Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs that reflect management'smanagement’s best estimate of what market participants would use to price the assets or liabilities at the measurement date.


The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2017 for assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis:

(In thousands) Level I  Level II  Level III  Total 
Cash equivalents $35,834  $  $  $35,834 
Warrant liabilities        (527)  (527)

The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2016 for assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis:

(In thousands) Level I  Level II  Level III  Total 
Cash equivalents $56,276  $  $  $56,276 
Warrant liabilities        (3,789)  (3,789)

There were no transfers between Levels I, II and III during 2017 or 2016.
The changes in carrying amounts of the warrant liability for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
(In thousands) 2017  2016 
Beginning balance $3,789  $693 
Issued     6,933 
Exercised  (1,895)  (9)
Net changes in valuation  (1,367)  (3,828)
Ending balance $527  $3,789
 
Liabilities measured at fair market value on a recurring basis include warrant liabilities resulting from recent debt and equity financing. In accordance with ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity ("ASC 815-40"), the warrant liabilities are being marked to fair value each quarter-end until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method, using assumptions consistent with the Company's application of ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ("ASC 505-50"). See Warrant Liabilities below.

The Company considers carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and term loan, net to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

Patents and Patent Application Costs— Although the Company believes that its patents and underlying technology have continuing value, the amount of future benefits to be derived from the patents is uncertain. Patent costs are therefore expensed as incurred.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-8#


Net Income (Loss) Per Share of Common Share Stock— Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutedby dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net income applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued using the weighted-average numbertreasury stock method. Potential shares of common stock are excluded from the computation when their effect is antidilutive. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted net income per share andif the exercise prices were lower than the average fair market value of common share equivalents outstanding. stock during the reporting period.

 Schedule of Shares Excluded from Computation of Diluted Loss Per Share

       
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
    
Options to acquire common stock  2,827,820   3,166,270 
Warrants to acquire common stock  4,167   193,196 
Convertible preferred stock  9,363,637    
Preferred investment option  11,363,637    
Shares excluded from computation of diluted loss per share  23,559,261   3,359,466 

Potentially dilutive stock options, warrants and warrants to purchase approximately 7.6 million, 8.3 million and 3.6 million shares at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively,securities from the table above were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share, because the effect would be anti-dilutive.

F-11
Warrant Liabilities

Stock-based CompensationLiabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include warrant liabilities resulting from the Company's July 2016 equity financings. In The Company accounts for share-based awards to employees and nonemployees directors and consultants in accordance with ASC 815-40, the warrant liabilities are being marked to fair value each quarter-end until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method, using assumptions consistent with CytRx's application of ASC 505-50. The gain or loss resulting from the fair value calculation is shown on the Statements of Operations as gain (loss) on warrant liabilities. See "Note 10 – Warrant Liabilities" for additional information related to the determination of fair value of warrants.

Stock-based Compensation — The Company's stock-based employee compensation plans are described in Note 13. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 718, which requiresCompensation—Stock Compensation., and under the recently issued guidance following FASB’s pronouncement, ASU 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASC 718, and applicable updates adopted, share-based awards are valued at fair value measurementon the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees.
For stock options and stock warrants paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505-50, Equity ("ASC 505"), as amended. Non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expensefair value is recognized over the requisite service, or vesting, period. At the end of each financial reporting period prior to performance, the value of these options, as calculatedThe Company values its equity awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricingoption pricing model, is determined, and compensation expense recognized or recovered during the period is adjusted accordingly. Since the fair market value of options granted to non-employees is subject to change in the future, the amount of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the common stock options or warrants are fully vested.
accounts for forfeitures when they occur.

Research and Development Expenses— Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. Costs to acquire technologies, including licenses and drugs, that are utilized in research and development and that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Technology developed for use in its products is expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established.

Clinical Trial Expenses — Clinical trial expenses, which are included in research and development expenses, include obligations resulting from the Company's contracts with various clinical research organizations in connection with conducting clinical trials for its product candidates. The Company recognizes expenses for these activities based on a variety of factors, including actual and estimated labor hours, clinical site initiation activities, patient enrollment rates, estimates of external costs and other activity-based factors. The Company believes that this method best approximates the efforts expended on a clinical trial with the expenses it records. The Company adjusts its rate of clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from its estimates. If its estimates are incorrect, clinical trial expenses recorded in any particular period could vary. Non-refundable advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development activities are expensed when the activity has been performed or when the goods have been received rather than when the payment is made.

Income Taxes— The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, ("(“ASC 740"740”) which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards using enacted tax rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit or expense is recognized as a result of changes in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all of any deferred tax assets will not be realized.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the 2017 Tax Act) was enacted reducing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% which is effective on January 1, 2018. The carrying value of the Company's deferred tax assets is also determined by the enacted U.S. corporate income tax rate. Consequently, any changes in the U.S. corporate income tax rate have impacted the carrying value of the Company's deferred tax assets. Under the new corporate income tax rate of 21%, deferred income taxes decreased but there is a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance. Therefore, the 2017 Tax Act is expected to have no impact on the Company's 2017 earnings. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, as of December 31, 2017, the Company has not completed its accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act; however, the Company has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-9#


The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The Company'sCompany’s policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expenses.

Concentrations of Risks— Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents in large well-capitalized financial institutions and the Company'sCompany’s investment policy disallows investment in any debt securities rated less than "investment-grade"“investment-grade” by national ratings services. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash or cash equivalents or its short-term investments. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances.

Use of EstimatesThe preparationPreparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformityconformance with accounting principles generally accepted inU.S. GAAP requires the United States of America requiresCompany’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affectimpact the reported amounts reportedof assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. SignificantThe significant estimates includein the accrual for research and development expenses,Company’s consolidated financial statements relate to the valuation onof equity awards, recoverability of deferred tax assets, contingent liabilitiesinsurance claims and estimated useful lives of fixed assets. The Company bases estimates and assumptions on historical experience, when available, and on various factors that it believes to be reasonable under the estimate of expense arising from the common stock optionscircumstances. The Company evaluates its estimates and warrants granted to employeesassumptions on an ongoing basis, and non-employees. Actualits actual results could materiallymay differ from those estimates.

Recentestimates made under different assumptions or conditions.

New Accounting Pronouncements— In January 2017,June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Credit Losses - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASC 326”). The standard significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets, including accounts and notes receivables. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model, under which companies will recognize allowances based on expected rather than incurred losses. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of ASU entitled "Intangibles - Goodwill2016-13 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

F-12

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt — Debt with Conversion and Other (Topic 350)Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): SimplifyingAccounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the Testaccounting for Goodwill Impairment." The objectiveconvertible debt by eliminating the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models. Upon adoption of ASU 2020-06, convertible debt proceeds, unless issued with a substantial premium or an embedded conversion feature that is not clearly and closely related to the host contract, will no longer be allocated between debt and equity components. This modification will reduce the issue discount and result in less non-cash interest expense in financial statements. ASU is2020-06 also updates the earnings per share calculation and requires entities to simplify howassume share settlement when the convertible debt can be settled in cash or shares. For contracts in an entityentity’s own equity, the type of contracts primarily affected by ASU 2020-06 are freestanding and embedded features that are accounted for as derivatives under the current guidance due to a failure to meet the settlement assessment by removing the requirements to (i) consider whether the contract would be settled in registered shares, (ii) consider whether collateral is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Thisbe posted, and (iii) assess shareholder rights. ASU 2020-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.2023. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.


In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)." The objective of ASU No. 2016-15 is to provide specific guidance on eight cash flow classification issues and how to reduce diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities forpermitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 20172020, and interim periods within thoseonly if adopted as of the beginning of such fiscal years. The Company is still in the process of determining the impact that the implementation of ASU 2016-15 will have on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 includes several areas of simplification to stock compensation including simplifications to the accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefits on the Statement of Cash Flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.year. The Company adopted this Standard onASU 2020-06 effective January 1, 2017.2021. The adoption of this StandardASU 2020-06 did not have a materialany impact toon the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial positionstatement presentation or its results of operations.
disclosures.

In February 2016,May 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 842)260)," which requires companies Debt — Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options (“ASU 2021-04”). ASU 2021-04 provides guidance as to recognize all leaseshow an issuer should account for a modification of the terms or conditions or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option (i.e., a warrant) that remains classified after modification or exchange as assets and liabilities onan exchange of the consolidated balance sheet. This ASU retainsoriginal instrument for a distinction between finance leases and operating leases, and the classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the current accounting literature. The result of retaining a distinction between finance leases and operating leases is that under the lessee accounting model in Topic 842,new instrument. An issuer should measure the effect of leases in a statement of operations and a statement of cash flows is largely unchanged from previous GAAP.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier adoption is permitted. Althoughmodification or exchange as the Company has not finalized its process of evaluatingdifference between the impact of adoptionfair value of the modified or exchanged warrant and the fair value of that warrant immediately before modification or exchange and then apply a recognition model that comprises four categories of transactions and the corresponding accounting treatment for each category (equity issuance, debt origination, debt modification, and modifications unrelated to equity issuance and debt origination or modification). ASU on its financial statements, the Company expects there will not be a material increase to assets and liabilities on the Company's balance sheet for leases currently classified as operating leases.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." ASU 2016-01 amends various aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure for financial instruments. With respect to the Company's financial statements, the most significant impact relates to the accounting for equity investments. It will impact the disclosure and presentation of financial assets and liabilities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption by public entities is permitted only for certain provisions. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this guidancewill have a material impact on its financial statements.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-10#


In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 "Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes." ASU 2015-17 simplifies the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes and requires that all deferred taxes be presented as noncurrent. ASU 2015-172021-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 with2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity should apply the guidance provided in ASU 2021-04 prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity elects to early adoption permitted.adopt ASU 2021-04 in an interim period, the guidance should be applied as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The adoption of this updateASU 2021-04 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Other recent authoritative guidance issued by the FASB (including technical corrections to the ASC), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) did not, or are not expected to, have a material effectimpact on the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition",statements and requires entities to recognize revenue when they transfer control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Company is currently assessing the method of adoption and the impact this new guidance will have on its financial statements. The Company expects to adopt these standards using the modified retrospective method. The timing of revenue recognition for variable consideration under our licensing and collaboration agreements may be different as a result of this new guidance. The Company is reviewing its licensing agreement for variable consideration, and if any such consideration exists, whether it should be estimated and recognized earlier than under the current revenue guidance.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASU 2015-14") which deferred the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date and allows for adoption using a full retrospective method, or a modified retrospective method. The Company will adopt the new standard in its first quarter 2018 using the modified retrospective method and is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its financial statements.
related disclosures.

3. Foreign Currency Remeasurement

The U.S. dollar has been determined to be the functional currency for the net assets of the Company's laboratory in Freiburg, Germany.Company’s German operations. The transactions are recorded in the local currencies and are remeasured at each reporting date using the historical rates for nonmonetary assets and liabilities and current exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities are recognized in other income (loss). The Company recognized a lossgain (loss) of approximately $23,000, $18,000$(22,440) and $6,000$26,800 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

4. Receivables
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a receivable of $7.5 million as compared to $0.2 million at December 31, 2016, primarily related to amounts recoverable from its insurance carrier, associated with ongoing legal proceedings. Of this amount, approximately $1.7 million and $0.2 million relate to recoverable legal costs and approximately $5.8 million and $0 relate to recoverable legal settlements accrued by the Company as

As of December 31, 20172021 and 2016, respectively (See Note 11). Due to2020, the likelihoodCompany’s cash balances consisted of the collectabilityfollowing:

Schedule of the accounts receivable, no allowance was recorded.

5. Prepaid and Other Assets
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $1.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of prepaid and other current assets, which consist primarily of deposits on contracts for research and development, prepaid insurance and leases for its facility.
6.Company’s Cash Balance

  2021  2020 
U.S. Dollars $6,671,404  $9,892,046 
Euros – in US $  98,199   111,329 
Cash Balance  $6,769,603  $10,003,375 

4. Equipment and Furnishings

Equipment and furnishings at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 consist of the following (in thousands):

  2017  2016 
Equipment and furnishings $2,212  $2,811 
Less — accumulated depreciation  (1,169)  (851)
Equipment and furnishings, net $1,043  $1,960 
         
following:

 Schedule of Equipment and Furnishings

  2021  2020 
Equipment and furnishings $59,728  $137,924 
Less — accumulated depreciation  (26,944)  (98,166)
Equipment and furnishings, net $32,784  $39,758 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 20152020 were $629,312, $536,631$13,978 and $317,649,$29,037, respectively.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-11#


7. During the year ended December 31, 2021, fully depreciated Equipment and furnishings of approximately $85,000 were written off.

5. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 are summarized below (in thousands)below.

Schedule of Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities 

  2021  2020 
Professional fees $

208,345

  $234,700 
Liquidated damages– see Note 7  615,253    
Research and development costs     9,296 
Payable to former CEO  256,115

    
Wages, bonuses and employee benefits  

261,375

   215,191 
Royalties and milestones  716,155   716,155 
Other  7,263   15,568 
Total $

2,064,506

  $1,190,910 

F-13

  2017  2016 
Professional fees $209  $193 
Research and development costs  223   2,208 
Litigation settlement  6,450   700 
Wages, bonuses and employee benefits  396   487 
Royalties  626    
Other  125   242 
Total $8,029  $3,830 

8. Deferred Revenues

6. Leases

We lease office space and office copiers related primarily generate revenue through licensing arrangements of our intellectual property.to the Company’s administrative activities. The Company recognizes revenue when amounts are realized or realizableaccounts for leases under ASC 842, Leases, which requires an entity to recognize a right-of-use asset and earned. Revenuea lease liability for virtually all leases.

In January 2020, the Company signed a new four-year office lease which covers approximately 2,771 square feet of office and storage space. This lease is considered realizableeffective March 1, 2020 and earned whenextends through February 29, 2024, with a right to extend the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence ofterm for an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3)additional five-year period, subject to the price is fixed or determinable;terms and (4) collection of the amounts due are reasonably assured. Amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenueconditions set forth in the Company's balance sheets. Amounts expectedlease agreement. The monthly rent is $14,340, subject to be recognized as revenue withinannual increases of 3.5 percent. In February 2020, the 12 months followingCompany renewed its additional storage space lease, which requires us to make monthly payments of $1,405, subject to a 2.5 percent annual increase. The Company recorded a right of use asset and lease liability obligation of $715,310 upon inception of these leases. The Company also reclassified a previously existing right-of-use asset of $66,271 from other assets to right-of-use asset.

As of December 31, 2021, the balance sheet dateof right-of-use assets was approximately $397,200, and the balance of total lease liabilities was approximately $415,200.

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases under ASC 842 as of December 31, 2021 are classified as current liabilities.follows:

Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Payments

  

Operating

Lease Payments

 
    
Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 $197,152 
Jan 2023 – Dec 2023  200,927 
Jan 2024 – Dec 2024  33,672 
Total future minimum lease payments  431,751 
     
Less: present value adjustment  (16,551)
Operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2021  415,200 
Less: current portion of operating lease liabilities  (198,819)
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion $216,381 

The components of rent expense and supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the period are as follows:

Schedule of Rent Expense and Supplemental Cash Flow Information Related to Leases

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2021

 
Lease Cost    
     
Operating lease cost (included in General and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations) $199,276 
     
Other information    
     
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2021 $188,683 
     
Weighted average remaining lease term – operating leases (in years)  2.2 
     
Average discount rate  3.6%

F-14
Deferred revenue represents amounts received prior to revenue recognition.

7. Financing Under Security Purchase Agreement

On October 3, 2017, CytRx entered into a Reimbursement Agreement with NantCell, Inc. whereby the Company agreed to reimburse them for payment obligations under certain of the contracts under the NantCell licensing agreement up to a maximum of $4.2 million plus one half of any amounts in excess thereof. Once all conditions of the agreement are met and no contingencies remain outstanding, the revenue will be recognized as licensing fee revenue. CytRx recognized $6.9 million of deferred revenue from the NantCell licensing agreement and anticipates recording this as revenues in 2018, once the Company's cost reimbursement obligations are met.

9. Term Loan
On February 5, 2016,July 13, 2021, the Company entered into a loanSecurities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with a single institutional investor (the “Investor”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $10 million and securitynet proceeds of approximately $9.2 million. The transaction closed on July 16, 2021. Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold and issued (i) 2 million shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.88 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $1.76 million in a registered direct offering (the “Registered Direct Offering”) and (ii) 8,240 shares of Series C 10.00% Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) at a purchase price of $1,000 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $8.24 million, in a concurrent private placement (the “Private Placement” and, together with the Registered Direct Offering, the “July 2021 Offerings”). The shares of the Preferred Stock are convertible, upon shareholder approval as described below, into an aggregate of up to 9,363,637 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.88 per share. Holders of the Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, and the Company shall pay, cumulative dividends at the rate per share (as a percentage of the stated value per share) of 10.00% per annum, payable quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning on the first such date after the date of issuance. The terms of the Preferred Stock include beneficial ownership limitations that preclude conversion that would result in the Investor owning in excess of 9.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. CytRx also issued to the Investor an unregistered preferred investment option (the “Preferred Investment Option”) that allows for the purchase of up to 11,363,637 shares of common stock for additional gross proceeds of approximately $10 million if the Preferred Investment Option is exercised in full. The exercise price for the Preferred Investment Option is $0.88 per share. The Preferred Investment Option has a term equal to five and one-half years commencing upon the Company increasing its authorized common stock following shareholder approval. The Company held a special meeting of stockholders on September 23, 2021 at which time the shareholders did not approve the proposal to increase the Company’s authorized common stock. On March 15, 2022, the Company received stockholders’ approval to increase its authorized shares (see below). On October 1, 2021, the Company paid a quarterly 10% dividend to the Investor in the amount of $171,668.

The Company accounted for these transactions as a single transaction for accounting purposes and allocated total proceeds to the respective instruments based upon the relative fair value of each instrument. The Company determined that the relative fair value of (i) the 2,000,000 shares of the common stock issued was $859,218, (ii) the relative fair value of the 8,240 shares of Preferred Stock was $4,022,700, and (iii) the relative fair value of the Preferred Investment Option was $4,293,872 based upon a Black Scholes valuation model. As such, the Company recorded as Additional Paid in Capital the fair value of the common stock and Preferred Investment Option of $5,153,090, and the fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock was $4,022,700 which has been reflected as mezzanine (temporary equity) due to certain clauses of the Securities Purchase Agreement.

Terms of Series C Preferred Stock

Under the Certificate of the Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series C 10.00% Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”), each share of Series C Preferred Stock will be convertible, subject to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation (as defined below), at either the holder’s option or at the Company’s option (a “Company Initiated Conversion”) at any time following stockholder approval having been obtained to amend our restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock above 41,666,666 (the “Stockholder Approval”), into common stock at a conversion rate equal to the quotient of (i) the Series C Stated Value of $1,000 (the “Series C Stated Value”) plus, in the case of a Company Initiated Conversion, all accrued and accumulated and unpaid dividends on such share of Series C Preferred Stock, divided by (ii) the initial conversion price of $0.88, subject to specified adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, reclassifications or other similar events as set forth in the Certificate of Designations.

F-15

The Certificate of Designations contains limitations that prevent the holder thereof from acquiring shares of common stock upon conversion that would result in the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by such holder and its affiliates exceeding 9.99% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the conversion (the “Beneficial Ownership Limitation”), except that upon notice from the holder to the Company, the holder may increase or decrease the amount of ownership of outstanding shares of common stock after converting the holder’s shares of Series C Preferred Stock, provided that the Beneficial Ownership Limitation in no event exceeds 9.99% of the number of outstanding shares of the common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon conversion of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock held by the holder and provided that any increase in the Beneficial Ownership Limitation shall not be effective until 61 days following notice to the Company

Each holder of shares of Preferred Stock is entitled to receive dividends, commencing from the date of issuance of the Preferred Stock. Such dividends may be paid only when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), out of assets legally available therefore, quarterly in arrears on the first day of January, April, July and October in each year, commencing on the date of issuance, at the dividend rate of 10.00% per year. Such dividends are cumulative and continue to accrue on a daily basis whether or not declared and whether or not we have assets legally available therefore.

Under the Certificate of Designations, each share of Series C Preferred Stock carries a liquidation preference equal to the Series C Stated Value plus accrued and unpaid and accumulated dividends thereon. Such liquidation preference is payable upon certain change in control transactions and accordingly, this instrument is classified as mezzanine (temporary equity).

The holders of the Series C Preferred Stock may vote their shares of Preferred Stock on an as-converted basis, subject to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation (which Beneficial Ownership Limitation shall be calculated on a basis which includes the number of shares of common stock which are issuable upon conversion of the unconverted Series C Stated Value beneficially owned by a holder or any of its affiliates or attribution parties on all matters submitted to the holders of common stock for approval). The Company may not take the following actions without the prior consent of the holders of at least a majority of the Preferred Stock then outstanding: (a) alter or change adversely the powers, preferences or rights given to the Preferred Stock or alter or amend the Certificate of Designations, (b) authorize or create any class of stock ranking as to dividends, redemption or distribution of assets upon a Liquidation (as defined in the Certificate of Designations) senior to, or otherwise pari passu with, the Preferred Stock, (c) amend its Certificate of Incorporation or other charter documents in any manner that adversely affects any rights of the holders of the Preferred Stock, (d) increase the number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock, or (e) enter into any agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. ("HTGC"respect to any of the foregoing.

Terms of Preferred Investment Option

The Preferred Investment Option to purchase up to 11,363,637 shares of common stock is exercisable at a price of $0.88 per share. The Preferred Investment Option have a term of five and one-half years from the Authorized Share Increase Date. The holders of the Preferred Investment Option may exercise the Preferred Investment Option on a cashless basis, solely to the extent there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus in such registration statement is not available for the resale of the shares of common stock issuable at the time of exercise. The Company is prohibited from effecting an exercise of any Preferred Investment Option to the extent that such exercise would result in the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by such holder and its affiliates exceeding 9.99% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise of the Preferred Investment Options by the holder (the “PIO Beneficial Ownership Limitation), except that upon notice from the holder to the Company, the holder may increase or decrease the amount of ownership of outstanding shares of Common Stock after exercising the holder’s Preferred Investment Option, provided that the PIO Beneficial Ownership Limitation in no event exceeds 9.99% of the number of outstanding shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon exercise of the Preferred Investment Option held by the holder and provided that any increase in the PIO Beneficial Ownership Limitation shall not be effective until 61 days following notice to the Company. The Preferred Investment Option provides for a Black-Scholes payout upon certain fundamental change transactions relating to the Company, as administrative agent and lender, and Hercules Technology III, L.P.specified therein. If the fundamental change transaction is within the control of the Company, the payout will be in cash. Otherwise, the payout will be in the same form of consideration received by the common stockholders as a result of this transaction.

Until the Authorized Share Increase Date, the Company may not issue any shares of common stock upon exercise of the Preferred Investment Option.

F-16

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the July 2021 Offerings, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of July 13, 2021 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), as lender,with the investor named therein, pursuant to which the lenders made long-term loansCompany will undertake to the Company on February 8, 2016 in the aggregate principal amountfile, within five calendar days of $25 million.

The Term Loans bear interest at the daily variable rate per annum equal to 6.0% plus the prime rate, or 10.5%, whichever is greater.  CytRx was required to make interest-only payments on the Term Loans through February 28, 2017, and beginning on March 1, 2017 blended equal monthly installments of principal amortization and accrued interest until the maturity date of the Term Loansfiling of the proxy statement seeking the Stockholder Approval, a resale registration statement to register the shares of common stock issuable upon: (i) the conversion of the Preferred Stock sold in the Private Placement and (ii) the exercise of the Preferred Investment Option (the “Registrable Securities”); and to cause such registration statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as possible after the filing thereof, but in any event no later than 75 days following the pricing date of this offering, or no later than 105 days following such date in the event of a “full review” by the SEC, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to keep such registration statement continuously effective under the Securities Act until the date that all Registrable Securities covered by such registration statement have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144. The Registration Rights Agreement provided for liquidated damages to the extent that the Company does not file or maintain a registration statement in accordance with the terms thereof. The registration rights agreement entered into between us and the Investor on February 1,July 13, 2021, contains a triggering event which would require us to pay to any holder of the Preferred Stock an amount in cash, as partial liquidated damages and not as a penalty, on a monthly basis equal to the product of 2.0% multiplied by the aggregate subscription amount paid by such holder for shares of Preferred Stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement; provided, however, that such partial liquidated damages shall not exceed 24% of the aggregate subscription amounts paid by such holders pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, or $1,977,600. If we fail to pay any partial liquidated damages within seven days after the date payable, we will be required to pay interest on any such amounts at a rate equal to the lesser of 18% per annum or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company did not have enough authorized shares to issue the issuable shares under the Preferred Stock and Preferred Investment Option. The Company attempted, but was unsuccessful, to obtain stockholders’ approval for the increase in authorized shares, and accordingly, the Company was unable to meet its registration rights obligation as of December 31, 2021.

As such, the Company recognized an aggregate of approximately $1.1 million in liquidated damages during the year ended December 31, 2021, of which includes a provision of $615,123 as an accrual for estimated damages until stockholders’ approval is achieved and the Registration Statement is filed. On March 15, 2022, the Company received stockholders’ approval to increase its authorized shares and Company expects to file a Registration Statement on or about March 23, 2022 and has provided for liquidated damages through that date.

8. Departure of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

In connection with a Separation Agreement (as defined below), Steven A. Kriegsman, who served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CytRx Corporation (the “Company”), departed from his roles as an officer of the Company and the Chairman of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), Mr. Kriegsman’s departure as Chairman of the Board was not in connection with any disagreement between Mr. Kriegsman and the Company, its management, the Board or any committee of the Board on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices, or any other matter.

In connection with the execution of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kriegsman’s existing executive employment agreement, as amended (the “Prior Employment Agreement”), was terminated; provided, however, that certain surviving customary confidentiality provisions and milestone and royalty payments as defined in the Prior Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. Pursuant to the Prior Employment Agreement and the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kriegsman received a lump sum cash payment equal to approximately $6.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. In addition, the Company has accrued $256,115 of health benefits payable to him as of December 31, 2021.

9. Stock Compensation

Stock Options

The Company has a 2008 Stock Incentive Plan under which 5 million shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. As of December 31, 2021, there were approximately 2.3 million shares subject to outstanding stock options and approximately 0.8 million shares outstanding related to restricted stock grants issued from the 2008 Plan. This plan expired on November 20, 2018 and thus no further shares are available for future grant under this plan.

In November 2019, the Company adopted a 2019 Stock Incentive Plan under which 5.4 million shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. As of December 31, 2021, there were 550,000 shares subject to outstanding stock options and 25,000 shares outstanding related to restricted stock grants from the 2019 Plan. This Plan expires on November 14, 2029.

There were no stock options issued to employees and directors in 2021 and 2020.  Under

F-17

During the year ended December 31, 2021, options to acquire 300,000 shares of common stock were exercised resulting in net proceeds of $78,000. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of approximately 2.8 million shares of its common stock upon the exercise of 4.55 million options. Of the 4.55 million option shares, holders of 4.4 million options exercised their shares on a cashless basis into approximately 2.69 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company received $39,000 for the exercise of the remaining 150,000 options shares in exchange for 150,000 shares of its common stock.

The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options and restricted stock included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Schedule of Stock-based Compensation Expense

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
General and administrative – employee $  $327,854 
Total employee stock-based compensation $  $327,854 

There were no options granted to employees and directors during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Presented below is the Company’s stock option activity for employees and directors:

Schedule of Stock Options Activity

  Stock Options  

Weighted Average

Exercise Price

 
  2021  2020  2021  2020 
Outstanding — beginning of year  2,801,270   7,126,340  $7.68  $11.55 
Granted            
Exercised  (300,000)  (4,300,000)  0.26   0.26 
Forfeited        9.49    
Expired  (38,450)  (25,070)  14.62   41.03 
Outstanding — end of year  2,462,820   2,801,270   7.68   7.68 
Exercisable at end of year  2,462,820   2,801,270  $7.68  $7.68 
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year: $  $         

No options were issued to consultants in 2021 or 2020.

At December 31, 2021, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested non-employee stock options. Presented below is the Company’s non-employee stock option activity:

Schedule of Stock Options Activity

  Stock Options  

Weighted Average

Exercise Price

 
  2021  2020  2021  2020 
Outstanding — beginning of year  365,000   615,000  $5.49  $3.36 
Granted            
Exercised     (250,000)     0.26
Expired/Forfeited            
Outstanding — end of year  365,000   365,000   5.49   5.49 
Exercisable at end of year  365,000   365,000  $5.49  $5.49 
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year: $  $         

F-18

The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding stock options under the two plans at December 31, 2021:

Schedule of Ranges of Stock Options

Range of
Exercise
Prices
  Number of Options  Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)  Weighted-Average Exercise Price  Number of Options Exercisable  Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)  Weighted-Average Exercise Price 
$0.26 - $1.00   550,000          7.95  $              0.26   550,000          7.95  $               0.26 
$1.01 - $3.00   1,050,673   5.60  $2.04   1,050,673   5.60  $2.04 
$3.01 - $15.00   817,482   3.10  $12.54   817,482   3.10  $12.54 
$15.01 - $42.42  409,674   2.12  $25.24   409,674   2.12  $25.24 
     2,827,829   4.83  $8.09   2,827,829   4.83  $8.09 

The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding options and options vested as of December 31, 2021 was $143,000.

Restricted Stock

In December 2021, the Company granted to Jennifer Simpson, who serves on our Board of Directors, 25,000 shares of restricted common stock, pursuant to the 2019 Plan. This restricted stock vests on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the market price of the Company’s shares on the grant date less the par value received as consideration. The fair value of the restricted stock on the grant date was $11,200. No restricted stock was granted in 2020. As of December 31, 2021, there is $11,200 of unamortized stock compensation that will be amortized through December 2022,

In December 2017, the Company granted to Steven Kriegsman, Chief Executive Officer, 387,597 shares of restricted common stock, pursuant to the 2008 Plan. This restricted stock vests in equal annual instalments over three years. The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the market price of the Company’s shares on the grant date less the par value received as consideration. The fair value of the restricted stock on the grant date was $679,000 and was amortized over the three-year term through 2020. The Company recorded an employee stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock of approximately $216,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Equity-Classified Warrants

A summary of the Company’s warrant activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are shown below.

Schedule of Warrants Activity and Related Information

  Warrants  

Weighted Average

Exercise Price

 
  2021  2020  2021  2020 
Outstanding — beginning of year  193,916   193,916  $8.60  $8.60 
Granted            
Exercised            
Forfeited            
Expired  (189,749)     8.04    
Outstanding — end of year  4,167   193,916   33.60   8.60 
Exercisable at end of year  4,167   193,916  $33.60  $8.60 
Weighted average fair value of warrants granted during the year: $  $         

The outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2021 had 0 intrinsic value.

F-19

9. Stockholder Protection Rights Plan

On December 13, 2019, the Board of Directors of the Company, authorized and declared a dividend of one right (a “Right”) for each of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The dividend was paid to the stockholders of record at the close of business on December 23, 2019. Each Right entitled the registered holder, subject to the terms of the loan, CytRxOriginal Rights Agreement (as defined below), to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of the Company’s Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), at a price of $5.00 (the “Purchase Price”), subject to certain adjustments. The description and terms of the Rights were set forth in the Rights Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2019 (the “Original Rights Agreement”), by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).

On November 12, 2020, the Board approved an amendment and restatement of the Original Rights Agreement (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Rights Agreement”) to effect certain changes to the Original Rights Agreement, including (i) reducing the duration to a term of three years, subject to certain earlier expiration as described in more detail below, and (ii) lowering the beneficial ownership threshold at which a person or group of persons becomes an Acquiring Person (as defined below) to 4.95% or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock, subject to certain exceptions. The Amended and Restated Rights Agreement is requireddesigned to maintaindiscourage (i) any person or group of persons from acquiring beneficial ownership of more than 4.95% of the Company’s shares of Common Stock and (ii) any existing stockholder currently beneficially holding 4.95% or more of the Company’s shares of Common Stock from acquiring additional shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

The purpose of the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement is to protect value by preserving the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating losses and certain other tax attributes (collectively, the “Tax Benefits”) to offset potential future income tax obligations. The Company’s ability to use its Tax Benefits would be substantially limited if it experiences an “ownership change,” as such term is defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”). A corporation generally will experience an ownership change if the percentage of the corporation’s stock owned by its “5-percent shareholders,” as defined in Section 382 of the Tax Code, increases by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a minimum cash balancerolling three-year period. The Amended and Restated Rights Agreement is intended to reduce the likelihood the Company would experience an ownership change under Section 382 of the Tax Code.

The Rights will not be exercisable until the earlier to occur of (i) the close of business on the tenth business day after a public announcement or filing that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons has become an “Acquiring Person,” which is defined as a person or group of affiliated or associated persons that, at any time after the date of the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 4.95% or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock, subject to certain exceptions or (ii) the close of business on the tenth business day after the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to commence, a tender offer or exchange offer the consummation of which would result in any person becoming an Acquiring Person (the earlier of such dates being called the “Distribution Date”) (provided, however, that if such tender or exchange offer is terminated prior to the occurrence of the Distribution Date, then no Distribution Date shall occur as a result of such tender or exchange offer).

The Rights, which are not exercisable until the Distribution Date, will expire at or prior to the earliest of (i) the close of business on November 16, 2023; (ii) the time at which the Rights are redeemed pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement; (iii) the time at which the Rights are exchanged pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement; (iv) the time at which the Rights are terminated upon the occurrence of certain mergers or other transactions approved in advance by the Board; and (v) the close of business on the date set by the Board following a determination by the Board that (x) the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement is no longer necessary or desirable for the preservation of the Tax Benefits or (y) no Tax Benefits are available to be carried forward or are otherwise available (the earliest of (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) is referred to as the “Expiration Date”).

Each share of Preferred Stock will be entitled, when, as and if declared, to a preferential per share quarterly dividend payment equal to the greater of (i) $10 million$1.00 per share or (ii) forward three months projected cash burn. As security under their obligations,an amount equal to 1,000 times the Company issueddividend declared per share of Common Stock. Each share of Preferred Stock will entitle the holder thereof to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the lenders warrants to purchase a totalstockholders of 105,691the Company. In the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of its common stock at an exercise priceCommon Stock are converted or exchanged, each share of $12.30. These warrants are classified as equity warrants with a fair value of $633,749.  All outstanding principal and accrued interest on the term loansPreferred Stock will be dueentitled to receive 1,000 times the amount received per one share of Common Stock.

F-20

The Purchase Price payable, and payable in full on the maturity date of February 1, 2020.

On July 28, 2017, CytRx entered into a First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules to amend its existing long-term loan facility (the "Loan Agreement"). The amendment provided for payment, on July 28, 2017, of $5.0 million in outstanding principal and unpaid interest due under the Loan Agreement, plus a $100,000 prepayment charge, and for repayment, on or prior to September 30, 2017, of an additional $5.0 million outstanding principal and unpaid interest due under the Loan Agreement, plus a second $100,000 prepayment charge. CytRx also agreed to an updated schedule of monthly payments and a new maturity date of August 1, 2018. Pursuant to the amendment, a portion of the warrants (representing 80% of the total number of shares of Preferred Stock or other securities or property issuable, upon exercise of the warrants) was amendedRights are each subject to changeadjustment from time to time to prevent dilution (i) in the event of a stock dividend on, or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of the Preferred Stock, (ii) upon the grant to holders of the Preferred Stock of certain rights or warrants to subscribe for or purchase Preferred Stock or convertible securities at less than the then-current market price of the Preferred Stock or (iii) upon the distribution to holders of the Preferred Stock of evidences of indebtedness or assets (excluding regular periodic cash dividends or dividends payable in Preferred Stock) or of subscription rights or warrants (other than those referred to above). The number of outstanding Rights and the number of one one-thousandths of a share of Preferred Stock issuable upon exercise of each Right are also subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividends and other similar transactions involving the Common Stock.

In the event that any person or group of affiliated or associated persons becomes an Acquiring Person, each holder of a Right, other than the Rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person, affiliates and associates of the Acquiring Person and certain transferees thereof (which will thereupon become null and void), will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a Right that number of shares of Common Stock having a market value of two times the Purchase Price.

In the event that, after a person or a group of affiliated or associated persons has become an Acquiring Person, the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction, or 50% or more of the Company’s assets or earning power are sold, proper provision will be made so that each holder of a Right will thereafter have the right to receive, upon the exercise thereof at the then-current purchase price of the Right, that portionnumber of shares of common stock of the warrantsacquiring company having a market value at the time of that transaction equal to two times the Purchase Price.

With certain exceptions, no adjustment in the Purchase Price will be required unless such adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least one percent (1%) in the Purchase Price. No fractional shares of Preferred Stock will be issued (other than fractions which are integral multiples of one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock, which may, at the election of the Company, be evidenced by depositary receipts) and, in lieu thereof, an adjustment in cash will be made based on the market price of the Preferred Stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date of exercise.

At any time after any person or group of affiliated or associated persons becomes an Acquiring Person and prior to the acquisition of beneficial ownership by such Acquiring Person of 50% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, the Board, at its option, may exchange each Right (other than Rights owned by such person or group of affiliated or associated persons which will have become void), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share of Common Stock per outstanding Right (subject to adjustment).

In connection with any exercise or exchange of the Rights, no holder of a Right will be entitled to receive shares of Common Stock if receipt of such shares would result in such holder, together with such holder’s affiliates and associates, beneficially owning more than 4.95% of the then-outstanding Common Stock (such shares, the “Excess Shares”) and the Board determines that such holder’s receipt of Excess Shares would jeopardize or endanger the value or availability of the Tax Benefits or the Board otherwise determines that such holder’s receipt of Excess Shares is not in the best interests of the Company. In lieu of such Excess Shares, such holder will only be entitled to receive cash or a note or other evidence of indebtedness with a principal amount equal to the then-current market price of the Common Stock multiplied by the number of Excess Shares that would otherwise have been issuable.

At any time before the Distribution Date, the Board may redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.001 per Right (subject to certain adjustments) (the “Redemption Price”). The redemption of the Rights may be made effective at such time, on such basis and with such conditions as the Board in its sole discretion may establish.

Immediately upon the action of the Board electing to redeem or exchange the Rights, the Company shall make a public announcement thereof, and upon such election, the right to exercise the Rights will terminate and the only right of the holders of Rights will be to receive the Redemption Price.

Until a Right is exercised or exchanged, the holder thereof, as such, will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company, including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive dividends.

F-21

The Board may amend or supplement the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement without the approval of any holders of Rights, including, without limitation, in order to (a) cure any ambiguity, (b) correct inconsistent provisions, (c) alter time period provisions, including the Expiration Date, or (d) make additional changes to the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement that the Board deems necessary or desirable. However, from $12.30 per shareand after the date any person or group of affiliated or associated persons becomes an Acquiring Person, the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement may not be supplemented or amended in any manner that would adversely affect the interests of the holders of Rights.

10. Income Taxes

At December 31, 2021, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of $335.0 million and $259.9 million, respectively, available to $4.62 per share,offset against future taxable income. Of this amount, $310.3 million of federal NOLs expire in 2024 through 2037. The federal operating losses after 2018 totaling $24.4 million carry forward indefinitely but are only able to offset 80% of taxable income in future years. The California NOLs expire in 2029 through 2040.

As a result of a change in-control that occurred in the CytRx shareholder base, approximately $67.6 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards became substantially limited in their annual availability. Management currently believes that the remaining $267.4 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards, and the $259.9 million in state net operating loss carryforwards, are unrestricted.

As of December 31, 2021, CytRx also had research and development tax credits for federal and state purposes of approximately $16.0 million and $22.0 million, respectively, available for offset against future income taxes, which expire in 2022 through 2036. The credits are subject to change-in-control limitations, which may affect their utilization in future years. Based on an assessment of all available evidence including, but not limited to, the Company’s limited operating history in its core business and lack of profitability, uncertainties of the commercial viability of its technology, the impact of government regulation and healthcare reform initiatives, and other risks normally associated with biotechnology companies, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss carryforwards and credits will not be realized and, as a result, a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and income tax carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, all of which are long-term, are as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

  2021  2020 
  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards $74,167  $72,509 
Tax credit carryforwards  37,866   37,901 
Equipment, furnishings and other  4,174   4,174 
Total deferred tax assets  116,207   114,584 
Deferred tax liabilities      
Net deferred tax assets  116,207   114,584 
Valuation allowance  (116,207)  (114,584)
Deferred tax assets $  $ 

For all years presented, the Company did not recognize any deferred tax assets or liabilities. The net change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was calculated$1.6 million and $9.5 million, respectively.

F-22

The provision for income taxes differs from the provision computed by applying the Federal statutory rate to net loss before income taxes as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation

  2021  2020 
  Years ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Federal benefit at statutory rate $(2,745) $(1,407)
State income taxes, net of Federal taxes  (913)  (592)
State credits      
Warrant liabilities      
Other permanent differences  1,685   7 
Provision related to change in valuation allowance  1,947   1,996 
Federal rate adjustment      
NQ Options      
Current year tax credit      
NOL Adjustments      
Termination/Cancellation of Equity Compensation Awards      
Return to provision  26   (4)
Other, net      
Provision for income taxes $  $ 

There have been no changes to the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the year ended December 31, 2021.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. As of the year ended December 31, 2021, the tax returns for 2018 through 2021 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and for 2017 to 2021 for various state tax authorities.

The Company’s policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of the date of adoption of ASC 740 and the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had accrued no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Aldoxorubicin

The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to aldoxorubicin provides for our payment of up to an aggregate of $7.5 million upon meeting specified clinical and regulatory milestones up to and including the product’s second, final marketing approval. We also will be obliged to pay:

commercially reasonable royalties based on a percentage of net sales (as defined in the agreement);
a percentage of any non-royalty sub-licensing income (as defined in the agreement); and
milestones of $1,000,000 for each additional final marketing approval that we might obtain.

Arimoclomol

The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to arimoclomol provides for our payment of up to an aggregate of $3.65 million upon receipt of milestone payments from Orphayzme A/S.

Innovive

Under the merger agreement by which we acquired Innovive, we agreed to pay the former Innovive stockholders a total of up to approximately $18.3 million of future earnout merger consideration, subject to our achievement of specified net sales under the Innovive license agreements. The earnout merger consideration, if any, will be payable in shares of our common stock, subject to specified conditions, or, at our election, in cash or by a combination of shares of our common stock and cash. Our common stock will be valued for purposes of any future earnout merger consideration based upon the 30-day volume-weighted averagetrading price of our common stock over the 30-day period beginning 15 days before the July 28, 2017 announcement of the NantCell license transaction. CytRx evaluated the amended debt agreement under ASC 470 and determined it to be a modification and that in accordance with accounting guidance for debt modifications, the incremental fair value of the repriced warrants of $77,000 and the $200,000 fee paid to the lender was recorded as additional loan discount to be recognized using the interest method over the remaining life of the loan.  The payment schedule was changed, and the loan will mature in 2018.

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-12#



As security for the Company's obligations under the loan and securities agreement, the Company granted HTGC, as administrative agent, a security interest in substantially all of its existing and after-acquired assets except for its intellectual property and certain other excluded assets.
  
December 31,
2017
  
December 31,
2016
 
Term Loan Principal – Current $9,986,362  $6,214,057 
End Fee Payable  1,771,250    
Issuance Cost/Loan Discount – Current  (1,157,817)  (732,401)
Term Loan, Net – Current $10,599,795  $5,481,656 
         
Long Term Loan Principal $  $18,785,943 
End Fee Payable     1,771,250 
Long Term Loan Discount/Issuance Cost     (2,072,683)
Long Term Loan, Net $  $18,484,510 

10. Warrant Liabilities
Warrants issued in connection with the Company's July 2016 equity public offering and modified in the Company's December 2016 equity public offering are classified as liabilities as opposed to equity due to their settlement terms. These warrants are non-cash liabilities and the Company is not required to expend any cash to settle these liabilities. The fair value of these warrants were recorded on the balance sheet at issuance and the warrants were marked to fair value at each financial reporting period, with changes in the fair value recorded as a gain or loss in the statement of operations. The fair value of the warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of significant judgment and estimates for the inputs used in the model. The warrants issued in connection with the Company's August 2011 equity public offering expired in August 2016. The following reflects the weighted-average assumptions for each of the periods indicated:
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
          
Risk-free interest rate  1.53%  0.90%  0.57%
Expected dividend yield  0%  0%  0%
Expected lives  0.55   1.23   0.59 
  Expected volatility  96.7%  119.1%  61.7%
Number of warrants classified as liabilities  2,834,246   4,752,512   1,061,976 
Gain on warrant liabilities $1,367,777  $3,827,617  $4,437,628 

The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact the Company has never paid cash dividends and presently has no intention of paying cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time the earnout merger consideration is paid.

F-23

As of December 31, 2021, no amounts are due under the grant for instruments with a similar expected life. The expected lives are based on the remaining contractual lives of the related warrants at the valuation date. The Company's computation of expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of its publicly traded stock.

In 2017, 1.2 million warrants expired, and 0.9 million warrants were exercised resulting in the issuance of 0.9 million shares of the Company's common stock. In 2016, 4.8 million warrants in connection with the July 2016 equity offering were issued.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The Company acquires assets still in development and enters into research and development arrangements with third parties that often require milestone and royalty payments to the third-party contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events linked to the success of the asset in development. Milestone payments may be required, up to an aggregate of $7.5 million, contingent upon the successful achievement of an important point in the development life-cycle of the pharmaceutical product (e.g., approval of the product for marketing by a regulatory agency). If required, CytRx may also have to make royalty payments, based upon a percentage of the sales of the pharmaceutical product. In respect of aldoxorubicin, it agreed to pay up to a maximum amount of approximately $18.3 million, payable in shares of its common stock, in the event that regulatory approval for marketing is obtained.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-13#


   These arrangements may be material individually, and in the unlikely event that milestones for multiple products covered by these arrangements were reached in the same period, the aggregate charge to expense could be material to the results of operations in any one period. In addition, these arrangements often give CytRx the discretion to unilaterally terminate development of the product, which would allow CytRx to avoid making the contingent payments; however, CytRx is unlikely to cease development if the compound successfully achieves clinical testing objectives.
CytRx'sabove agreements.

Contractual obligations

CytRx’s current contractual obligations that will require future cash payments arefor the following Employment Agreements as follows (in thousands):

  
Operating
Leases (1)
  
Employment Agreements (2)
  
Research and Development (3)
  Total 
2018 $373  $1,678  $1,000  $3,051 
2019  278   1,057      1,335 
  2020  59   1,057      1,116 
  2021     1,057      1,057 
2022            
  Thereafter            
Total $710  $4,849  $1,000  $6,559 
____________


Schedule of Current Contractual Obligations

  Employment Agreements (1) 
2022  1,085 
2023   
2024   
2025   
Thereafter   
Total $1,085 

(1)Operating leases are primarily facility lease related obligations, as well as equipment lease obligations with third party vendors. The Company recognized rent expenses of $420,106, $358,247, and $351,075 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(2)Employment agreements include management contracts which have been revised from time to time. The employment agreement for the Company'sCompany’s executive officers provide for minimum salaries, which are adjusted annually at the discretion of the Company'sCompany’s Compensation Committee, and in some cases provide for minimum annual bonuses and employee benefits, as well. New employment agreements for the Company'sCompany’s other executive officers are usually entered into annually or biennially.annually.

(3)Research and development obligations relate primarily to the Reimbursement Agreement with NantCell. All of these purchase obligations are cancelable.

Contingencies

The Company applies the disclosure provisions of ASC 460, Guarantees ("ASC 460"460”) to its agreements that contain guarantees or indemnities by the Company. The Company provides (i) indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain investors and other parties for certain losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with various types of third-party claims; and (ii) indemnifications of varying scope and size to officers and directors against third party claims arising from the services they provide to the Company.


Shareholder Derivative Actions in Delaware.  There are two competing derivative complaints pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claims related to the Company's alleged retention of DreamTeamGroup and MissionIR.  On December 14, 2015, a shareholder derivative complaint, captioned Niedermeyer et al. v. Kriegsman et al., C.A. No. 11800, was filed against certain of the Company's officers and directors, for which a second amended complaint was filed on October 12, 2016.  On September 6, 2016, one of the plaintiffs in the California litigation (discussed above) effectively refiled his complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with the case captioned Taylor v. Kriegsman, C.A. No. 12720.   Following competing motions for appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, on February 22, 2017, the Court of Chancery appointed Niedermeyer et al.as lead plaintiffs in the complaint. On May 3, 2017, the parties entered into negotiations with a mediator and on June 2, 2017, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") to settle the entire action. On June 15, 2017, the MOU was submitted to the Court and the parties are now seeking Court approval. The Stipulation of Settlement was filed with the Court on January 22, 2018, which was preliminarily approved by the Court.  A final approval hearing is scheduled for April 19, 2018.  Any petition for an attorney fee award to the Plaintiff's counsel will also be considered by the Court at the April 19, 2018 hearing.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-14#


Class Action in California.  On July 25 and 29, 2016, nearly identical class action complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, titled Crihfield v. CytRx Corp., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-05519 and Dorce v. CytRx Corp., Case No. 2:16-cv-05666 alleging that the Company and certain of its officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by allegedly making materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failing to disclose material adverse facts to the effect that the clinical hold placed on the Phase 3 trial of aldoxorubicin for STS would prevent sufficient follow-up for patients involved in the study, thus requiring further analysis, which could cause the trial's results and/or FDA approval to be materially adversely affected or delayed.  The plaintiffs allege that such wrongful acts and omissions caused significant losses and damages to a class of persons and entities that acquired the Company's securities between November 18, 2014 and July 11, 2016, and seek an award of compensatory damages, costs and expenses, including counsel and expert fees, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On October 26, 2016, the Court entered an Order consolidating the actions titled In re: CytRx Corporation Securities Litigation, Master File No. 16-cv-05519-SJO and appointing a Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. Following the filing of a first amended complaint on January 13, 2017, on March 14, 2017 the Company and the individual defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss.  Plaintiff filed an Opposition thereto on April 28, 2017.  The Company and the individual defendants filed a Reply on May 30, 2017 and the matter was heard by the Court on June 12, 2017. On June 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint and the Individual Defendants filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff filed an Opposition thereto on July 24, 2017. The Company and the Individual Defendants filed a Reply on July 31, 2017. On August 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss. On September 18, 2017, the Court issued an Order setting a schedule for the case.  On January 30, 2018, the parties entered into negotiations with a mediator and on February 1, 2018, the parties entered into a confidential Term Sheet to settle the Class Action. On February 7, 2018, the Court stayed the action for all purposes until May 2, 2018, to provide the parties sufficient time to prepare and submit a stipulation of settlement.
Shareholder Derivative Action in Delaware (Zyontz). On October 17, 2017, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed against certain current and former directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, entitled Zyontz v. Kriegsman et al., Case No. 2017-0738-JRS. The complaint essentially sets forth the allegations pled in the federal securities class action in California, asserts a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, and seeks damages, fees and costs, and other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On December 18, 2017, the Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to make a demand on the Board and for failure to state a claim, and a motion to stay the proceedings pending resolution of the federal securities class action.  On January 30, 2018, the parties participated in a mediation.  The parties are currently negotiating a settlement agreement comprised of corporate governance reforms that will be submitted to the Court of Chancery for approval.
Shareholder Derivative Action in Delaware (Patterson). On September 1, 2017, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed against the current directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, entitled Patterson v. Kriegsman et al., C.A. No. 2017-0636-TMR. The complaint sets forth claims for breach of fiduciary duty for allegedly disseminating false and misleading information, unjust enrichment, gross mismanagement, abuse of control and corporate waste based on allegations concerning various business decisions matters. The complaint seeks damages, corporate governance reforms, restitution, fees and costs, and other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On September 26, 2017, the Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, for which the opening brief in support of such motion was filed on November 3, 2017, the plaintiff's opposition was filed on December 11, 2017, and the defendants' reply was filed on January 5, 2018.  The hearing on the motion to dismiss was heard by the Vice-Chancellor on March 8, 2018, and she took the matter under advisement. On March 13, 2018, the Vice-Chancellor ruled that defendants' motion to dismiss was granted, with prejudice.  
The Company intends to vigorously defend against the foregoing complaints. CytRx has directors' and officers' liability insurance, which will be utilized in the defense of these matters. The liability insurance may not cover all of the future liabilities the Company may incur in connection with the foregoing matters. These claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, and management's view of these matters may change in the future.

The Company evaluates developments in legal proceedings and other matters on a quarterly basis. The Company records accruals for loss contingencies to the extent that the Company concludes that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the related loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, was first identified in China and has accrued $6.5 millionsurfaced in several regions across the world. In March 2020, the disease was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. As the situation with Covid-19 continues to evolve, the companies which are working to further develop and commercialize our products, ImmunityBio and Orphazyme, could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of litigation settlementsthe risks, related to legal actions.

12. Equity Transactions
Asthis pandemic. Among other things, the active and planned clinical trials by ImmunityBio and Orphazyme and their regulatory approvals, if any, may be delayed or interrupted, which could delay or adversely affect the Company’s potential receipt of December 31, 2017,milestone and royalty payments within the Company has reserved approximately 1.2 million of its authorized but unissued shares of common stock for future issuance pursuant to its employee stock option plans issued to employeesdisclosed time periods and consultants.
In December 2017, the Company issued an additional 12,268 fractional shares of its common stock as a result of is 1 to 6 reverse stock split and issued 387,597 shares in restricted common stock (see Note 13).
In the second and third quarters of 2017, a total of 880,788 shares of the Company's common stock were issued from the exercise of warrants and options.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-15#


   On July 27, 2017, the Company issued 1,969,697 shares of its common stock and 500,000 warrants to purchase common stock as part of an exclusive licensing agreement granted to NantCell, Inc.
On May 2, 2017, the Company issued 5 million of its common stock in a public offering.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Company converted 518 shares of its Series B preferred stock in exchange for 1,233,334 shares of its common stock.
In 2016, the Company issued 55,000 shares of its common stock resulting from the exercise of employee stock options and issued 387,597 shares in restricted common stock.
On December 16, 2016, the Company issued 1,923,457 shares of its common stock and 550 convertible preferred shares at a stated value of $1,000, and repriced 3,232,981 warrants from the July 2016 financing, from $4.20 to $3.06 per common stock, along with extending their term through July 2018, all in respect of a public offering. As a result of the Series B conversion price of $2.52 being less than the common stock price at the closing date, a beneficial conversion feature was recognized in the amount of $0.3 million. Since the preferred stock was immediately convertible, the entire beneficial conversion feature was recognized as a deemed dividend on December 16, 2016. In December 2016, 32 preferred shares were converted at their conversion rate of $2.52 in exchange for 76,191 common shares.
On July 20, 2016, the Company issued 4,761,905 shares of its common stock and one-year warrants to purchase an equal number of shares of its common stock in a public offering.
On October 26, 2015, the Company retired 33,213 shares of its treasury stock at cost ($2.6 million).
On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 1,744,167 shares of common stock in a public offering.
13. Stock Options and Equity-Classified Warrants
Stock Options
The Company has a 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan under which 233,334 shares of common stock were originally reserved for issuance. As of December 31, 2017, there were 44,371shares subject to outstanding stock options. This plan expired on August 6, 2010, and thus no further shares are available for future grant under this plan.
The Company also has a 2008 Stock Incentive Plan under which 5 million shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. As of December 31, 2017, there were 2.8 million shares subject to outstanding stock options and 0.8 million shares outstanding related to restricted stock grants issued from the 2008 Plan and 1.2 million shares available for future grant under this plan.
The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees.
The fair value of the stock options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:
  2017  2016  2015 
Risk-free interest rate  2.04% - 2.35%  1.20% - 2.26%  1.74% - 2.12%
Expected volatility  86% - 92%  74% - 88%  74% - 85%
Expected lives (years)  6 - 10   6 - 10   6 - 10 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%

The Company's computation ofincrease expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of its publicly traded stock. For option grants issued during years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company used a calculated volatility for each grant. The Company lacks adequate information about the exercise behavior at this time and has determined the expected term assumption under the simplified method provided for under ASC 718, which averages the contractual term of the Company's options of ten years with the average vesting term of three years for an average of six years. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact the Company has never paid cash dividends and presently has no intention of paying cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of the grant for instruments with a similar expected life. Based on historical experience, for each of the two years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of 10% for options granted to its employees, 2% for options granted to senior management and 0% for options granted to directors. Compensation costs will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. The Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture rates are higher than estimated. On January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 and made a policy election to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact to the Company's financial condition or results of operations. No amounts relating to stock-based compensation have been capitalized. No amounts relating to employee stock-based compensation have been capitalized.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-16#


At December 31, 2017, there remained approximately $1.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options granted to current employees and directors, to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 1.15 years. Presented below is the Company's stock option activity for employees and directors:
  Stock Options  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
  2017  2016  2015  2017  2016  2015 
Outstanding — beginning of year  2,813,280   2,263,977   1,559,765  $14.14  $18.66  $16.98 
Granted  591,369   809,500   765,000   1.87   3.54   15.66 
Exercised  (19,213)  (55,000)  (47,857)  2.58   12.84   12.30 
Forfeited  (874,210)  (196,054)     13.11   20.94    
Expired  (19,047)  (9,143)  (12,931)  56.88   48.18   33.48 
Outstanding — end of year  2,492,179   2,813,280   2,263,977   11.35   14.14   18.66 
Exercisable at end of year  1,701,445   1,811,320   1,336,694  $14.85  $17.70  $20.70 
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year: $1.47  $2.58  $11.28             


For stock options paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505-50.
Non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period. At the end of each financial reporting period prior to performance, the value of these options, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, is determined, and compensation expense recognized or recovered during the period is adjusted accordingly. Since the fair market value of options granted to non-employees is subject to change in the future, the amount of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the common stock options are fully vested.
The Company recorded approximately $422,000, $0 and $0 of non-cash charges related to the issuance of stock options to certain consultants in exchange for services during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
At December 31, 2017, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested non-employee stock options. Presented below is the Company's non-employee stock option activity:
  
Stock Options
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
  2017  2016  2015  2017  2016  2015 
Outstanding — beginning of year  100,000   105,952   115,357  $16.41  $18.12  $20.82 
Granted  273,333         1.78       
Exercised                  
Expired/Forfeited     (5,952)  (9,405)     46.62   51.24 
Outstanding — end of year  373,333   100,000   105,952   5.70   16.41   18.12 
Exercisable at end of year  373,333   100,000   105,952  $5.70  $16.41  $18.12 
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year: $1.54  $  $             

The fair value of the stock options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:
  2017  2016  2015 
Risk-free interest rate  2.30% - 2.35%      
Expected volatility  92.00%      
Expected lives (years)  10       
Expected dividend yield         

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-17#


 The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding stock options under the two plans at December 31, 2017:
Range of
Exercise Prices
  
Number of Options
  
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Life
(years)
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  
Number of
Options
Exercisable
  
Weighted Average
Contractual Life
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
$1.50 — 1.75   829,702   9.96  $1.75   400,000   9.96  $1.75 
$1.76 —11.00   720,970   7.98   4.76   469,910   7.47   5.92 
$11.01 — 15.00   776,290   7.20   13.92   667,290   7.07   13.80 
$15.01 — 195.30   538,550   5.44   27.36   537,578   5.43   27.36 
                           
     2,865,512   7.86  $10.62   2,074,778   7.29  $13.21 

There was no aggregate intrinsic value to the outstanding options, options vested, and options exercised during 2017.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options included in the Company's Statements of Operations:
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Research and development - employee $549,315  $1,822,508  $1,590,267 
General and administrative - employee  1,909,729   4,661,795   5,568,537 
       Total employee stock-based compensation $2,459,044  $6,484,303  $7,158,804 
             
Research and development – non-employee $11,600  $  $ 
General and administrative – non-employee  410,400   235,764   225,852 
      Total non-employee stock-based compensation $422,000  $235,764  $225,852 

Restricted Stock
In December 2017, the Company granted to Steven Kriegsman, Chief Executive Officer, 387,597 shares of restricted common stock, pursuant to the 2008 Plan. This restricted stock vests in equal annual instalments over three years.  The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the market price of the Company's shares on the grant date less the par value received as consideration.  The fair value of the restricted stock on the grant date was $679,000. In December 2016, the Company granted to Steven Kriegsman, Chief Executive Officer, 387,597 shares of restricted common stock, pursuant to the 2008 Plan. This restricted stock vests in equal annual instalments over three years.  The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the market price of the Company's shares on the grant date less the par value received as consideration.  The fair value of the restricted stock on the grant date was $1,000,000.  The Company did not issue any restricted stock for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company recorded an employee stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock of approximately $344,000, $15,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-18#


Equity-Classified Warrants
In July 2017, pursuant to a Loan amendment (see Note 9), a portion of the warrants (representing 80% of the total number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants) was amended to change the exercise price of 84,554 warrants to $12.30 per share from $4.62 per share.
In July 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to purchase common stock as part of an exclusive licensing agreement granted to NantCell, Inc.
In December 2016, the Company issued to a consultant an eighteen-month contingent warrant to purchase 333,334 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.20. No expense was recorded due to the performance contingent nature of the warrants.
In February 2016, in connection with a loan and security agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. and Hercules Technology III, L.P. ("lenders") (see Note 9), the Company issued to the lenders warrants to purchase a total of 105,691 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $12.30. These warrants had a fair value of $633,749 on the date of issuance and were recorded as a loan discount.
In February 2016, the Company also issued a warrant to a consultant to purchase 83,334 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $10.44. These warrants will be fully vested by February 2018. The warrant expense in 2017 and 2016, recognized as non-employee stock-based compensation expenses, was $41,865 and $157,797, respectively.
A summary of the Company's warrant activity and related information for the years ended December 31 are shown below.
  Warrants  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
  2017  2016  2015  2017  2016  2015 
Outstanding — beginning of year  5,417,155   1,204,245   1,224,960  $4.08  $25.68  $25.62 
Granted  584,554   5,284,263      6.31   3.72    
Exercised  (861,581)  (9,393)  (1,667)  3.66   4.20   15.00 
Forfeited                  
Expired  (1,159,347)  (1,061,960)  (19,048)  4.92   26.88   22.92 
Outstanding — end of year  3,980,781   5,417,155   1,204,245   4.26   4.08   25.68 
Exercisable at end of year  3,626,613   5,031,715   1,204,245  $4.23  $4.02  $25.68 
Weighted average fair value of warrants granted during the year: $1.65  $1.56  $             

The following table summarizes additional information concerning warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017:

         
Warrants Outstanding
          
Range of
Exercise Prices
  
Number of Shares
  
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Life
(years)
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  
Number of
Warrants
Exercisable
  
Weighted Average
Contractual Life
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
$3.00 — 6.00   3,252,137   0.60  $3.19   2,918,803   0.62  $3.08 
$6.01 — 9.00   500,000   1.07   6.60   500,000   1.07   6.60 
$9.01 — 12.00   83,335   3.11   10.44   62,501   3.11   10.44 
$12.01 — 33.60   145,309   1.19   16.65   145,309   1.19   16.65 
                           
     3,980,781   0.74  $4.26   3,626,613   0.75  $4.23 

CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-19#


14. Stockholder Protection Rights Plan
Effective April 16, 1997, the Company's board of directors declared a distribution of one right ("Rights") for each outstanding share of the Company's common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 1997 and for each share of common stock issued by the Company thereafter and prior to a Flip-in Date (as defined below). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one-ten thousandth (1/10,000th) of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $30. The Rights are generally not exercisable until 10 business days after an announcement by the Company that a person or group of affiliated persons (an "Acquiring Person") has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company's then outstanding shares of common stock (a "Flip-in Date").
In the event the Rights become exercisable as a result of the acquisition of shares, each Right will enable the owner, other than the Acquiring Person, to purchase at the Right's then-current exercise price a number of shares of common stock with a market value equal to twice the exercise price. In addition, unless the Acquiring Person owns more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock, the Board of Directors may elect to exchange all outstanding Rights (other than those owned by such Acquiring Person) at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock per Right. All Rights that are owned by any person on or after the date such person becomes an Acquiring Person will be null and void.
The Rights have been distributed to protect the Company's stockholders from coercive or abusive takeover tactics and to give the Board of Directors more negotiating leverage in dealing with prospective acquirers. In July 2016, the Company extended the stockholder rights plan through April 2022.
15. Income Taxes
At December 31, 2017, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $373.7 million and $236.3 million, respectively, available to offset against future taxable income, which expire in 2018 through 2037.
As a result of a change in-control that occurred in the CytRx shareholder base in 2013, approximately $136.8 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards became substantially limited in their annual availability. Management currently believes that the remaining $236.9 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards, and the $236.3 million in state net operating loss carryforwards, are unrestricted.
As of December 31, 2017, CytRx also had research and development tax credits for federal and state purposes of approximately $16.6 million and $21.9 million, respectively, available for offset against future income taxes, which expire in 2022 through 2037. Based on an assessment of all available evidence including, but not limited to, the Company's limited operating history in its core business and lack of profitability, uncertainties of the commercial viability of its technology, the impact of government regulation and healthcare reform initiatives, and other risks normally associated with biotechnology companies, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss carryforwards and credits will not be realized and, as a result, a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the 2017 Tax Act) was enacted reducing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% which is effective on January 1, 2018. The carrying value of the Company's deferred tax assets is also determined by the enacted U.S. corporate income tax rate. Consequently, any changes in the U.S. corporate income tax rate have impacted the carrying value of the Company's deferred tax assets. Under the new corporate income tax rate of 21%, deferred income taxes decreased but there is a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance. Therefore, the 2017 Tax Act is expected to have no impact on the Company's 2017 earnings. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued to address the application of US GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company has determined that the $27.3 million of deferred tax expense recorded in connection with the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Company implemented ASU 2016-09 during the first quarter of 2017 as stipulated in the FASB guidance for publicly-traded entities. To account for the implementation of ASU 2016-09, the Company accounted for previously unrecognized excess tax benefits by recognizing those benefits. Due to the Company's full valuation allowance, this recognition has no effect on the net accrual after the valuation allowance.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and income tax carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. The components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities, all of which are long-term, are as follows (in thousands):
  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating loss carryforwards $66,251  $126,244 
Tax credit carryforwards  33,899   29,970 
Equipment, furnishings and other  4,909   9,297 
Total deferred tax assets  105,059   165,511 
Deferred tax liabilities     (301)
Net deferred tax assets  105,059   165,210 
Valuation allowance  (105,059)  (165,210)
  $  $ 
For all years presented, the Company did not recognize any deferred tax assets or liabilities. The net change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $60.2 million and $21.4 million, respectively.
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-20#


The provision for income taxes differs from the provision computed by applying the Federal statutory rate to net loss before income taxes as follows (in thousands):
  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Federal benefit at statutory rate $(11,895) $(17,262) $(19,919)
State income taxes, net of Federal taxes  (2,073)  (3,086)  (3,556)
State credits  (506)  (1,031)  (1,324)
Warrant liabilities  (465)  (1,301)  (1,509)
Other permanent differences  11   40   16 
Provision related to change in valuation allowance  (60,358)  21,601   20,142 
Federal rate adjustment  27,314       
NQ Options  47       
Current year tax credit  (665)  (1,119)  (2,050)
NOL Adjustments  45,521       
Termination/Cancellation of Equity Compensation Awards  2,983   2,274   5,960 
Return to provision  84   (118)  2,238 
Other, net  3   3   3 
  $1  $1  $1 

There have been no changes to the Company's liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. As of the year ended December 31, 2017, the tax returns for 2013 through 2017 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and various state tax authorities.
The Company's policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.costs. As of the date of adoption of ASC 740this filing, senior management and the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016administrative staff are working primarily remotely and 2015,will return to their offices at a yet to be determined date.

12. Subsequent Events

On March 15, 2022, the Company had accrued no interest or penalties relatedheld a special meeting of stockholders, which was originally opened and subsequently adjourned on September 23, 2021, at which meeting the Company’s stockholders, by an affirmative vote of the majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of capital stock, approved the amendment to uncertain tax positions.


16. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial data for 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands, exceptthe Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect an increase in the number of shares of authorized common stock, par value $0.001 per share, data):
  Quarters Ended 
  March 31  June 30  September 30  December 31 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
2017            
Total revenues $  $  $  $100 
Net loss $(11,044) $(14,358) $(5,124) $(4,460)
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(0.60) $(0.60) $(1.14) $(0.16)
                 
2016                
Total revenues $  $100  $  $100 
Net loss $(12,643) $(18,280) $(12,175) $(7,672)
Basic and diluted loss per share applicable to common stock $(1.14) $(1.62) $(0.78) $(0.48)

Quarterlyfrom 41,666,666 shares to 62,393,940 shares, and year-to-date loss per share amounts are computed independentlyto make a corresponding change to the number of each other. Therefore,authorized shares of capital stock in order to comply with the sumCompany’s contractual obligations under a securities purchase agreement entered into on July 13, 2021. The number of shares of authorized preferred stock of the per share amounts forCompany remains unchanged.

On March 15, 2022, the quarters may not agreeCompany filed a Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware to effect the Authorized Share Increase Amendment.

On January 1, 2022, the Company paid a quarterly 10% dividend to the per share amounts forInvestor in the year.amount of $206,000.

F-24
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-21#




CYTRX CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

     
                 Additions
       
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
Beginning of Year
  
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  
Charged to Other
Accounts
  
Deductions
  
Balance at
End of Year
 
Reserve Deducted in the Balance Sheet from the Asset to Which it Applies:               
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets               
Year ended December 31, 2017 $165,210,000  $  $(60,151,000) $  $105,059,000 
Year ended December 31, 2016 $143,609,000  $  $21,601,000  $  $165,210,000 
Year ended December 31, 2015 $123,466,000  $  $20,143,000  $  $143,609,000 
CytRx 2017 10-K Page # F-22#