UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
| |
ý☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020
|
| |
o☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-11689
Fair Isaac CorporationCorporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Delaware | | 94-1499887 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
| | | |
| 181 Metro Drive, Suite 700 | | |
| San Jose, | California | | 95110-1346 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
408-535-1500408-535-1500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
(Title of Class)each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | (Name of each exchange on which registered)registered |
| Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | FICO | New York Stock Exchange Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesý☒ No o☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o☐Noý☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesý☒ No o☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesý☒ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):Act:
|
| | | | | |
| Large Accelerated Filer | | ý☒ | Accelerated Filer | | o☐ |
| Non-Accelerated Filer | | o☐ | Smaller Reporting Company | | o☐ |
| | | | Emerging Growth Company | | o☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý As of March 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,637,371,198$7,095,692,430 based on the last transaction price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. This calculation does not reflect a determination that certain persons are affiliates of the registrant for any other purposes.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding on October 27, 201730, 2020 was 29,990,22129,098,177 (excluding 58,866,56259,758,606 shares held by the Company as treasury stock).
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for therelating to its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2021 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated. The 2021 Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to be held on February 28, 2018.which this report relates.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
|
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| |
|
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| |
|
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| |
|
| Item 15. | | |
| |
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995 (the “PSLRA”). In addition, certain statements in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by us or with our approval that are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act.PSLRA. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) projections of revenue, income or loss, expenses, earnings or loss per share, the payment or nonpayment of dividends, capital structure and other statements concerning future financial performance; (ii) statements of our plans and objectives by our management or Board of Directors, including those relating to products or services, research and development, and the sufficiency of capital resources; (iii) statements of assumptions underlying such statements, including those related to economic conditions; (iv) statements regarding results of business combinations; (v) statements regarding business relationships with vendors, customers or collaborators, including the proportion of revenues generated from international as opposed to domestic customers; and (v)(vi) statements regarding products, their characteristics, performance, sales potential or effect in the hands of customers. Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” “should,” “potential,” “goals,” “strategy,” “outlook,” “plan,” “estimated,” ”will,” variations of these terms and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those described in Item 1A of Part I, Risk“Risk Factors, below.” below (including the impact of COVID-19 on macroeconomic conditions and our business, operations and personnel). The performance of our business and our securities may be adversely affected by these factors and by other factors common to other businesses and investments, or to the general economy. Forward-looking statements are qualified by some or all of these risk factors. Therefore, you should consider these risk factors with caution and form your own critical and independent conclusions about the likely effect of these risk factors on our future performance. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. Readers should carefully review the disclosures and the risk factors described in this and other documents we file from time to time with the SEC, including our reportsQuarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K to be filed by the Companyus in fiscal 2018.2021.
PART I
Item 1. Business
GENERAL
Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company,” which may also be referred to in this report as “we,” “us,” “our,” and “FICO”) provides products, solutions and services that enable businesses to automate, improve and connect decisions to enhance business performance. Our predictive analytics, which includes the industry-standard FICO® Score, and our decision management systems leverage the use of big data and mathematical algorithms to predict consumer behavior and power hundreds of billions of customer decisions each year.
We were founded in 1956 on the premise that data, used intelligently, can improve business decisions. Today, we help thousands of companies in over 100120 countries use our decision management technology to target and acquire customers more efficiently, increase customer value, reduce fraud and credit losses, lower operating expenses, and enter new markets more profitably. Most leading banks and credit card issuers rely on our solutions, as do insurers, retailers, telecommunications providers, automotive companies, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare organizations, public agencies and organizations in other industries. We also serve consumers through online services that enable people to purchaseaccess and understand their FICO® Scores, the standard measure in the U.S. of consumer credit risk, empowering them to manage their financial health.
More information about us can be found on our principal website, www.fico.com. We make our Annual ReportReports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments to those reports, available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the SEC. References to our website addressesaddress in this report are provided as a convenience and do not constitute an incorporation by reference. Information on our website is not part of this report.
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
We use analytics to help businesses automate, improve and connect decisions across their enterprise, an approach we commonly refer to as decision management. Most of our solutions address customer engagement, including customer acquisition, customer onboarding, customer servicing and management, and customer protection. We also help businesses improve non-customer decisions such as transaction and claims processing. Our solutions enable users to make decisions that are more precise, consistent and agile, and that systematically advance business goals. This helps our clients to reduce the cost of doing business increase revenues and profitability, reduce losses from risks and fraud, while helping increase revenues, profitability, and increase customer loyalty.
Our Segments
We categorize our products and services into the following three operating segments:
| |
| • | Applications. This segment includes pre-configured decision management applications designed for a specific type of business problem or process — such as marketing, account origination, customer management, fraud, financial crimes compliance, collections and insurance claims management — as well as associated professional services. These applications are available to our customers as on-premises software, and many are available as hosted, software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) applications through the FICO® Analytic Cloud.Cloud or Amazon Web Services (“AWS”). |
| |
| • | Scores. This segment includes our business-to-business scoring solutions and services, our business-to-consumer scoring solutions and services including myFICO® solutions for consumers, and associated professional services. Our scoring solutions give our clients access to analytics that can be easily integrated into their transaction streams and decision-making processes. Our scoring solutions are distributed through major credit reporting agencies worldwide, as well as services through which we provide our scores to clients directly. |
| |
| • | Decision Management Software. This segment is composed of analytic and decision management software tools that clients can use to create their own custom decision management applications, our new FICO® Decision Management Suite, as well as associated professional services. Decision management software is currently delivered as part of the FICO® Platform and is increasingly being adopted to connect decisioning solutions or previously disconnected use cases. These tools are available to our customers as on-premises software, or through the FICO® Analytic Cloud.Cloud or AWS. |
Segment revenues, operating income and related financial information for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 are set forth in Note 17 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Our Solutions
Our solutions involve four fundamental disciplines:
Analytics, which include predictive analytics that identify risks and opportunities associated with individual customers, prospects and transactions, in order to detect patterns such as risk, and fraud or profitability, as well as optimization analytics that are used to mathematically improve the design of decision logic or “strategies.”
Data management and transaction profiling that bring extensive consumer information to every decision.
Software such as decision management systems that author and implement business rules, models and decision strategies, often in a real-time environment, as well as software for managing customer engagement. This software is increasingly deployed as a platform solution that enables previously disparate use cases to be connected in a manner that provides a centralized or 360-degree view of a customer’s journey through traditionally siloed client offerings.
Consulting services that help clients make the most of investments in FICO applications, tools and scores in the shortest possible time.
All of our solutions are designed to help businesses make decisions that are faster, more precise, more consistent and more agile, while reducing costs and risks incurred in making decisions. With the new FICO® Analytic Cloud, FICO® Decision Management Platform and FICO® Decision Management Suite,In addition, we now offer our clients an increasinga portfolio of applications, tools and services in the cloud, which they can useallow them to create, customize, deploy and manage powerful analytic services.
Applications
We develop industry-tailored decision management applications, which apply analytics, data management and decision management software to specific business challenges and processes. Our applications primarily serve clients in the banking, insurance, telecommunications, healthcare, retail and public sectors. During fiscal 2017,2020, we continued to expand our product offerings for the FICO® Analytic Cloud and AWS, resulting in increased sales opportunities by accommodating small to mid-size businessescustomers that can benefit from the affordabilitypower, flexibility and simplicitymodularity of cloud-basedthese solutions. Within our Applications segment our fraud solutions accounted for 19%15%, 20%18% and 23%17% of total revenues in each of fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, respectively;2018, respectively, and our customer communication services accounted for 10%, 9% and 8% of total revenues for each of these periods, respectively; and our customer management solutions accounted for 8%, 9% and 9%10% of total revenues in each of these periods, respectively.
MarketingOrigination Applications
The chief offerings for marketing are our FICO® Analytic Offer Manager and FICO® Customer Dialogue Manager. These solutions offer a suite of products, capabilities and services designed to integrate the technology and analytic services needed to perform context-sensitive customer acquisition, cross-selling and retention programs and deliver mathematically optimized offers. Our marketing solutions enable companies that offer multiple products and use multiple channels (companies such as large financial institutions, consumer branded goods companies, pharmaceutical companies, retail merchants and hospitality companies) to execute more efficient and profitable customer interactions. Services offered in our marketing solutions include customer data integration services; services that enable real-time marketing through direct consumer interaction channels; campaign management and optimization services; interactive tools that automate the design, execution and collection of customer response data across multiple channels; and customer data collection, management and profiling services.
Originations Applications
We provide solutions that enable banks, credit unions, finance companies, alternative peer-to-peer and online lenders, auto lenders, and other companies to automate and improve the processing of requests for credit or service. These solutions increase the speed and efficiency with which requests are handled, reduce losses, and increase approval rates through analytics that assess applicant risk and reduce the need for manual review by loan officers.
The latest version of our origination application, FICO® Origination Manager, is an application-to-decision processing solution, is available both on premiseson-premises and in the FICO® Analytic Cloud. Our otherCloud, and we plan to make it available in the AWS cloud in fiscal 2021 with the launch of FICO® Origination Manager 5.0.
Other solutions include the web-based FICO® LiquidCredit® service, which is primarily focused on credit decisions and is offered largely to mid-tier banking institutions. WeFICO® Small Business Scoring Service℠ (SBSS) is recognized as the industry leader in assessing the risk of U.S. small business credit applicants. SBSS is delivered via our LiquidCreditservice infrastructure and it brings the speed of consumer lending to small business lending decisions. With SBSS, clients can typically make decisions in hours rather than days to improve customer satisfaction and help attract more small businesses.
Delivered as a cloud service, FICO® Origination Manager Essentials offers mid-market organizations the ability to inexpensively set up and process small business applications quickly, without a long or difficult implementation process. Origination Manager Essentials will be phased out in August 2021.
To support origination, we also offer custom and consortium-based credit risk and application fraud models.
Customer Management Applications
Our customer strategyportfolio management products and services enable businesses to automate and improve risk-based decisions for their existing customers. These solutions help businesses apply advanced analytics in account and customer decisions to increase portfolio revenue, decrease risk exposure and losses, and reduce customer attrition, while improving operational efficiencies.
We provide customer strategyportfolio management solutions for banking, telecommunications and retail. Our primary account and customer strategy management product is FICO® TRIAD® Customer Manager, a leading credit management system, is available both on premiseson-premises and in the FICO® Analytic Cloud. The solutionFICO® Strategy Director is an adaptive control system, which enablesthe newest, more flexible customer management application available on the FICO Analytic Cloud and AWS. These solutions enable businesses to rapidly adapt to changing business and internal conditions by designing and testing new strategies in a “champion/challenger” environment. The current version enablesversions enable users to manage risk and communications at both the account and customer level from a single platform.
We market and sell FICO® TRIAD® Customer Manager and FICO® Strategy Director software licenses, maintenance, consulting services, and strategy design and evaluation. Additionally, we provide TRIAD and Strategy Director services and similar credit account management services through third-party credit card processors worldwide, including two of the largest processors in the U.S.
Fraud Protection and Security ManagementCompliance Applications
Our fraud managementprotection and compliance products improve our clients’ profitability by predictingproviding protections across the likelihood a given transactioncustomer lifecycle from account origination to digital customer interactions—such as online or customer account is experiencing fraud.mobile logins—to non-monetary transactions—such as address changes or pin changes—to payment transactions. Our fraud productsand financial crimes solutions analyze transactionsactivity in real time and generate recommendations for immediate action, which isaction. These defenses are critical to stopping synthetic identity fraud, first-party fraud, and third-party fraud, as well as first-party fraudidentifying money laundering activity to help our clients stay compliant and deliberate misuse of account privileges.secure while safeguarding the customer experience.
Our fraud solutions are designed to detect and prevent a wide variety of fraudrisk types. By looking across products and risk types across multiple industries, channels—including creditreal-time payments, peer-to-peer transactions, digital payments, card payments (credit, debit, prepaid), and debit payment card fraud; e-payment fraud; deposit account fraud; healthcare fraud; Medicaid and Medicare fraud; and property and casualty insurance claims fraud, including workers' compensation fraud. deposits—FICO fraud solutions protecthelps financial institutions insurance companies and government agencies fromreduce losses and damaged customer relationships caused by fraud and related criminal behavior. FICO fraud solutions also help protect retailers, insurance companies and government agencies.
Our leading fraud detection solution is the FICO® Falcon® Platform, which is recognized as a global leader in global payment card fraud detection. The Falcon® Platform examines transaction, cardholder,transactional, account, customer, device and merchant data to detect a wide range of payment card fraud indicators quickly and accurately by utilizing artificial intelligence technology. It analyzes payment transactions in real time, assesses the risk of fraud in a fraud score, and provides the ability for user-defined variables and rules strategies to be used in conjunction with the fraud score to prevent fraud while expediting legitimate transactions. Adaptive analytics, a form of self-learning models, can also be employed to accelerate our customers’ response to evolving fraud tactics.
FICO® Fraud Predictor with Merchant Profiles is used in conjunction with the FICO® Falcon® Platform to improve fraud detection rates through the inclusion of merchant profiles, which is especially important for online transactions. Merchant profiles are built using fraud and transactional data that include characteristics revealing which merchants have a history of higher fraud volumes, and which purchase types and ticket sizes have most often been fraudulent at a particular merchant, among others.
In additionFICO® Falcon® Compromise Manager is used in conjunction with the FICO® Falcon® Platform to our Falcon products, weidentify point-of-sale and e-commerce card compromises with analytically derived recommended actions—such as card block and reissue, or watch-listing—to optimize loss prevention. Separately, the FICO® Card Alert Service prevents ATM debit fraud by identifying counterfeit or compromised payment cards and reporting them to issuers. The service analyzes daily transactions from participating networks and uses this data to identify common points of compromise and suspect cards most likely to incur fraud.
We offer a wide range of solutions focused on preventing and detecting a varietyidentity fraud. In August 2019, we introduced our identity proofing and user authentication solutions, FICO® Falcon® Identity Proofing and FICO® Falcon® Authentication Suite. Identity proofing is the digital process of onboarding new customers without requiring face-to-face verification. The technology provides an extra layer of security that is easy to use with minimal customer inconvenience, thereby preventing fraud as well as ensuring regulatory compliance standards such as e-KYC are met. User authentication is the real-time corroboration of an identity previously established to enable access to an electronic or digital asset. As an authentication hub, our technology includes multifactor, biometric, and behavioral (user and device-based) capabilities. By bringing digital identity verification into our broader portfolio, we give our clients the ability to strengthen fraud and financial crimes. crimes defenses with more contextual data and decisioning.
FICO® Application Fraud Manager helps businesses prevent both first- and third-party fraud during the application process. By preventing fraud prior to account origination, we help our customers avoid future losses as well as unnecessary collections costs. Separately, the FICO®Card Alert Service prevents ATM debit fraud by identifying counterfeit payment cards Identity Resolution Engine helps organizations detect and reporting them to issuers. The service analyzes daily transactions from participating networks, and uses this datainvestigate organized criminal behavior using graph analytics to identify common points of compromiseentities and suspect cards most likely to incur fraud.their connections across federated data sources.
FICO® Insurance Fraud Manager uses advanced unsupervised predictive modeling techniques to detect health care claims fraud, abuse and errors as soon as unusual behavior patterns emerge. Insurance Fraud Manager is used by both public and private health care payers to detect and prevent fraud in both pre- and post-pay fraud investigation environments.
FICO offersWe also offer a comprehensive modular set of compliance solutions to fight money-laundering, terrorist financing, and to fulfill custom requirements for governance, risk and compliance. These solutionsSolutions include, but are based onnot limited to, Know Your Customer (“KYC”), Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”), and Sanctions Screening.
In September 2019, FICO introduced FICO® Falcon® X, a unified platform for the acquisitiondetection and investigation of TONBELLER Aktiengesellschaft (“TONBELLER”) combined with FICO’s legacyboth fraud analytics, such as those used in theand financial crimes. We also announced FICO® Analytics Workbench™—Falcon® Platform.
FICO’s cybersecurity products utilize predictive analytics Edition, which allows banks’ data science teams to deliver enterprise-level risk assessmentsdevelop machine learning models using open source libraries, as well as prioritizationFICO machine learning libraries, and then deploy the models on Falcon X for operational use.
Prior to October 2020, when we divested this business, the FICO® Cyber Risk Score was part of tactical cyber threat response. Thethe FICO® Enterprise Security Score providesSuite and it provided an empirically derived score that conveysconveyed the security posture of an organization and the likelihood of a material data breach in the next 12following twelve months. The score iswas used by customers to manage the cyber risk of an enterprise, as well as risksassess third-party risk that may be introduced by trusted business partners. Separately, FICO® Falcon® Cybersecurity Analytics utilizes advanced streaming self-learning models to help organizations detectthird- and remediatefourth-party partners and suppliers, and provide an effective tool for cyber attacks by reducing the dwell time between when an attack occurs and when it is recognized. These products can be used independently or together as part of a comprehensive cyber risk management program.insurance underwriting.
Collections & Recovery Applications
FICO® Debt Manager™ solution and, FICO® Debt Manager™ Pro, FICO® Debt Manager™ Pro Plus, FICO® PlacementsPlus® service, FICO® Network and FICO® Placement OptimizerSM solution (collectively, the “FICO Debt Management Solutions”) automate the full cycle of collections and recovery, including early collections, late collections, asset disposal, agency placement and optimization, recovery, litigation, bankruptcy, asset management and residual balance recovery. PlacementsPlus service facilitates control over the distribution and management of accounts to agencies, attorneys, debt buyers and internal recovery departments. FICO Network provides creditors with a single, secure and compliant channel to exchange data with collection agencies, credit bureaus, debt buyers, attorneys, and other vendors. Placement Optimizer maximizes the effectiveness of the placement strategy once accounts are outsourced. FICO Debt Management Solutions also include assessments, models and scores, predictive analytics, advanced customer engagement optimization and speech analytics capabilities.optimization. FICO® Debt Manager™ is available both on premises and in the FICO® Analytic Cloud.
Customer Communication Services
FICO® Customer Communication Services provideis an intelligent omnichannel digital communication manager for executing customer engagement, fraud resolution, and collections solutions in the cloud.lifecycle decisions. It enables leading financial services institutions, utilities, telecommunications firms, insurers, and other businesses to engage in automated two-way communications. It allows businesses to reach customers in real time using short message service (“SMS”), mobile applications, automated voice, emailautomate individualized dialogues with the consistency and other channels; resolve matters such as verificationregulatory compliance of suspicious credit or debit card transactions; request missed payments; and resolve customer service issues. FICO®their human agents. With Customer Communication Services, combined with FICO’s decisionbusinesses can be available 24/7 for one-way or two-way communication through any channel consumers choose. Customers can rapidly launch mobile alerts, messaging, virtual agents, self-service options and other auto-resolution capabilities. It helps make the full customer journey—account origination and onboarding, customer management applications, allow businessesaccount notifications and engagement campaigns, fraud management and debt collection—more digital and raises the level of data-driven intelligence behind lifecycle communications. In addition to its own rules-based communication logic and embedded rules engine, Customer Communication Services can execute complex multi-step strategies shaped by risk-based segmentation, predictive scores, machine learning insights and mathematical optimization.
Marketing Applications
FICO® Marketing Solutions Suite is made up of products, capabilities and services designed to integrate the technology and analytic services needed to perform context-sensitive customer acquisition, cross-selling and retention programs and deliver mathematically optimized offers. The Marketing Solutions Suite enables companies that offer multiple products and use multiple channels (companies such as large financial institutions, consumer branded goods companies, pharmaceutical companies, retail merchants and hospitality companies) to execute more efficient and resolveprofitable customer interactions while improvinginteractions. Services offered in our marketing solutions include customer outcomes.data integration services; services that enable real-time marketing through direct consumer interaction channels; campaign management, messaging and optimization services; interactive tools that automate the design, execution and collection of customer response data across multiple channels; and customer data collection, management and profiling services.
Analytic Services
We perform custom analytics (descriptive, predictive descriptive and prescriptive) as well as decision modeling and related analytic and machine learning projects for clients in multiple industriesindustries. This enables them to addressimprove critical business processes and operationalize analytics across the customer life cycle. This work leverageslifecycle. We do so with our advanced analytic methodologies and domain expertise to solve risk management, fraud, marketing and marketingother challenges for a single business, using that business’s unique data and industry best practicesposition to develop a highly customized solution. Most of this work falls under predictive analytics, decision analysismodeling and optimization, which provide greater insight into customer preferences, andpredict future customer behavior.behavior and operationalize these analytics. Within decision analysis and optimization, we apply data and proprietary algorithms to the design of customer treatment strategies.strategies and improve business outcomes.
Scores
Our FICO® Scores are used in the majority of U.S. credit decisions, by nearly all of the major banks, credit card organizations, mortgage lenders and auto loan originators. These credit scores, developed based on third-party data, provide a consistent and objective measure of an individual’s credit risk. Credit grantors use our FICO® Scores in a variety of ways: to prescreen candidates for marketing programs; to evaluate applicants for new credit; and to manage existing customer accounts. FICO® Score is a three-digit score ranging from 300-850. They are calculated by running data from the three U.S. national credit reporting agencies, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax, through one of several proprietary scoring models developed by FICO. Lenders generally pay the credit reporting agencies scoring fees based on usage, and the credit reporting agencies pay an associated fee to us. FICO® Score 9,10 and FICO® Score 10 T, the most recent versionversions of the FICO® Score, wasare anticipated to be released in early fiscal 2015.at the three U.S. national credit reporting agencies by the end of calendar year 2020.
While the core FICO® Score is the foundation of our scoring portfolio, we offer a number of other broad-based scores, including several specific FICO® Industry Scores. We also develop various custom scores for our financial services clients. The FICO® Score XD expandsAdditionally, we continue to innovate by investing in the development of scores that can help expand the scorable population using alternative credit data. FICO® Score XD looks at public records and property data, and a consumer’s history with mobile, landline phone and cable payments, to generate scores on the same 300-850 scale as standard FICO® Scores. FICO® Score XD is available to lenders from LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Equifax. The UltraFICO™ Score considers consumer permissioned data from accounts such as checking, savings, or money market accounts. Incorporating consumer contributed data is a unique approach to helping empower consumers to establish or improve their creditworthiness by using data that reflects sound financial activity but that is not part of a traditional credit report. This can help consumers qualify for the credit they seek under more competitive terms. This approach is particularly helpful for consumers who may have very sparse or inactive credit files and are seeking a path toward greater financial inclusion in mainstream banking.
Outside the U.S., we offer the FICO® Score Scores, including scores using alternative data, for consumers, and in some cases for small and medium enterprises, through credit reporting agencies in 16 countries worldwide.agencies. We also have installed client-specific versions of the FICO® Score in nineover ten countries. Like FICO® Scores in the U.S., these scores help lenders in multiple countries leverage the FICO® Score’s predictive analysis to assess the risk of marketing prospects and credit applicants. FICO® Scores are in use or being implemented in 2030 different countries across five continents outside the U.S.
We also have scoring systems for insurance underwriters and marketers. TheyOur FICO® Insurance Scores use the same underlying statistical technology as our FICO® Scores, but are designed to predict applicant or policyholderfuture personal auto and homeowner insurance loss ratiolosses for automobile or homeowners’ coverage.new applicants and existing policyholders. Our insurance scores are available into the insurance industry throughout the U.S.
During fiscal 2020, we announced the launch of the FICO® Resilience Index, a new analytic tool designed to complement FICO® Score models by identifying those consumers who are most resilient to economic stress relative to other consumers within the same FICO® Score bands. FICO® Resilience Index would enable industry participants to more precisely assess credit risk and Canada. We licenseextend credit bureau scoring services and related consulting directly to users in banking throughmore consumers throughout the FICO® PreScore® service for prescreening solicitation candidates.economic cycle by managing the risk that emerges during periods of economic stress.
We also provide FICO® Score based products, education and information on FICO® Scores to consumers. They are distributed directly by us through our myFICO® service and through licensed distribution partners, including Experian and certain lenders, for use in customer and noncustomernon-customer programs.
The myFICO® products and subscription offerings are available online at www.myfico.com. Consumers can use the myFICO.com website to purchase their FICO® Scores, including credit reports associated with the scores, explanations of the factors affecting their scores, and customized information on how to manage their scores. We make available the 28 most widely used versions of the FICO® Score from the three major U.S. credit bureaus through our myFICO® service, representing approximately 95% of all FICO® Scores sold and used by lenders. Customers can use products to simulate how taking specific actions wouldcould affect their FICO® Score. Score 8. Consumers can also subscribe to monitoring services, which deliver alerts via email and text when changes to a user’s FICO® Scores or other credit report content are detected. In addition, consumers can purchase identity theft monitoring products that alert consumers of potential risks of identity fraud with comprehensive detection and identity restoration services.
Decision Management Software
We provide analytican analytics and decision management platforms and toolsplatform that businesses use to build their own tailored, analytically poweredanalytically-powered decision management applications on-premises, within theapplications. The FICO® Analytic Cloud or via third-party cloud environments such as Amazon Web Services. In contrast to our packaged applications developed for specific industry solutions, our tools platform Decision Management Platform adds scalable and flexible decision management capabilities to virtually any application or operational system. TheseTogether, these tools are sold as licensed software or as a SaaS offering in the cloud, and can be used standalone, or in conjunction with third-party solutions, to advance a client’s decision management initiatives. We use these tools as common softwarefoundational components for our own decision management solutions, described above in the Applications section. They are also key components“Applications” section, enhancing the cross-compatibility and extensibility of our decision management architecture.all of the software solutions we build and deliver. We also partner with third-party providers within given industry markets and with major software companies to embed our tools and other FICO Decision Management Platform components within their existing applications.
During fiscal 2017,2020, FICO continued to enhance the FICO® Decision Management Suite, a collection of toolsPlatform and related services for building, extending, deploying and scaling decision management applications and solutions. TheThese services are collectively referred to as the FICO® Decision Management Suite, includes the FICO® Decision Management Platform, along withand include capabilities for buildingauthoring, customizing, executing, and customizingmanaging predictive analytic, decisioning, and optimization components and services; developing, orchestrating and publishing analytics-powered applications; and visualizing, analyzing and reporting data trends. The FICO® Decision Management Suite is available in the FICO® Analytic Cloud and on-premises; businesses can choose either or both deployments depending on their specific needs, IT environments and other factors. Recent upgrades and enhancements to the functionality in the suiteComponent capabilities include:
| |
| • | FICO® Decision Management Platform, the fundamental backbone of the Suite, which connects, executes and powers proprietary platform services that dramatically improvesimprove performance, data interchange, model tracking and user collaboration; |
| |
| • | FICO® Decision Management Streaming (formerly known as Data Management Integration Platform),Modeler, the core decision rules modeling tool, which improves scale, performanceenables users to flexibly author and versatility;manage decision rules and strategies; |
| |
| • | FICO® Analytics Workbench™, the consolidated predictive analytics modeling authoring tool, with data wrangling, machine learning and explainable AI; |
| |
| • | FICO® Applications Workbench, an agile application UI builder, which leverages platform services to speed time to application deployment; |
| |
| • | FICO® Strategy Director, which helps organizations proactively manage consumer accounts to increase revenue, decrease risk and improve customer retention; |
| |
| • | FICO® Decision Central™ (formerly known as Model Central), a solution which enables users to monitor, manage, measure and control the deployment and performance of all decision assets including analytic models and rules-based decision strategies; |
| |
| • | FICO® Xpress Optimization, an analyticoptimization modeling suite which includes both the solver technology, Mosel, as well as a general-purpose optimization solver, Xpress Insight; and decision model management tool, which expands its versatility |
| |
| • | FICO® Decision Management Platform Streaming, a real-time and usability across a much broader range of implementationsbatch data ingestion solution that uniquely delivers in-stream analytics for real-time data insights and use cases.complex event processing. |
The FICO® Decision Management Suite combinesenables FICO’s clients to combine big data, predictive analytics and decision execution together in an easy-to-use, integrated development and deployment environment. It enables organizations to rapidly create innovative analytic applications; dramatically increase developer and business user productivity with support for a broad range of analytic and decision tools; and execute decisions in real time. It also empowers business analysts and other domain experts to modify systems in real time without IT involvement, providing organizations with the agility they need to rapidly respond to customer, regulatory and business changes.
The principal products offered areIn addition, FICO offers certain decision management software tools for:for use outside of the context of the FICO Decision Management Platform, including:
| |
• | Rules Management. The FICO® Blaze Advisor® decision rules management system is used to design, develop, execute and maintain rules-based business applications. The Blaze Advisor system enables business users to propose and preview the impact of changes to decisioning logic, to review and approve proposed changes, and commit those changes to production decisioning, all without demanding IT cycles. The Blaze Advisor system is sold as an end-user tool and is also the rules engine within several of our decision management applications. The Blaze Advisor system, available in six languages, is a multi-platform solution that: embeds rules management within existing applications; supports Web Services and service-oriented architecture, Java 2 Enterprise Edition platforms, Microsoft .NET and COBOL for z/OS mainframes; and is the first rules engine to support Java, .NET and COBOL deployment of the same rules. It also incorporates the exclusive Rete III rules execution technology, which improves the efficiency and speed with which the Blaze Advisor® system is able to process and execute complex, high-volume decision rules. FICO’s solution for rules management in the cloud is called FICO® Decision Modeler.
|
| |
• | Predictive Modeling. FICO® Decision Central™ is a comprehensive offering to help banks and other organizations, including insurance, retail and health care companies, maximize the power of their predictive and decision models and meet stricter regulations for model management. It complements FICO® Model Builder, which enables the user to develop and deploy sophisticated predictive models for use in automated decisions. This software is based on the methodology and tools FICO uses to build both client-level and industry-level predictive models and scorecards, which we have developed over more than 40 years, and includes additional algorithms for rapidly discovering variable relationships, predictive interactions and optimal segmentation. The predictive models produced can be embedded in custom production applications or one of our Decision Management applications and can also be executed in the FICO® Blaze Advisor® system. FICO’s solution set for predictive modeling in the cloud is called FICO® Analytic Modeler.
|
| |
• | Optimization. FICO® Xpress Optimization Suite provides operations research professionals with world-class solvers and high-productivity tools to quickly design and deliver custom, mathematically optimal solutions for a wide range of industry problems. Xpress includes a powerful modeling and programming language, with robust scalability, to quickly model and solve even the largest optimization problems. Xpress tools are licensed to end users, consultants and independent software vendors in several industries, and are a core component within FICO® Decision Optimizer. Decision Optimizer is a software tool that enables complex, large-scale optimizations involving dozens of networked action-effect models, and enables exploration and simulation of many optimized scenarios along an efficient frontier of options. The data-driven strategies produced by these tools can be executed by the FICO® Blaze Advisor® system or one of our Decision Management applications. FICO’s solution for executing optimization services in the cloud is called FICO® Optimization Modeler.
|
Rules Management. The FICO® Blaze Advisor® decision rules management system is used to design, develop, execute and maintain rules-based business applications. The Blaze Advisor system enables business users to propose and preview the impact of changes to decisioning logic, to review and approve proposed changes, and to commit those changes to production decisioning, all without demanding IT cycles. The Blaze Advisor system is sold as an end-user tool and is also the rules engine within several of our decision management applications. The Blaze Advisor system, available in six languages, is a multi-platform solution that: embeds rules management within existing applications; supports Web Services and service-oriented architecture, Java 2 Enterprise Edition platforms, and COBOL for z/OS mainframes; and is the first rules engine to support Java and COBOL deployment of the same rules. It also incorporates the exclusive Rete III rules execution technology, which improves the efficiency and speed with which the Blaze Advisor system is able to process and execute complex, high-volume decision rules.
Predictive Modeling. FICO® Decision Central™ is a comprehensive offering to help banks and other organizations-including insurance, retail and health care companies-streamline their predictive and decision model governance and meet stricter regulations for model management. It complements FICO® Analytics Workbench™, which enables the user to develop and deploy sophisticated predictive models for use in automated decisions. This software is based on the methodology and tools FICO uses to build both client-level and industry-level predictive models, which it developed from countless client engagements. The predictive models and strategies produced can be embedded in custom production applications, the FICO® Platform, or one of our decision management applications. FICO® Analytics Workbench is available for on-premises or cloud implementation.
Optimization. FICO® Xpress Optimization provides operations research professionals with world-class solvers and high-productivity tools to quickly design and deliver custom, mathematically optimal solutions for a wide range of industry problems. Xpress includes a powerful modeling and programming language, with robust scalability, to quickly model and solve even the largest optimization problems. Xpress tools are licensed to end users, consultants and independent software vendors in several industries, and are a core component within FICO® Decision Optimizer. Decision Optimizer is a software tool that enables complex, large-scale optimizations involving dozens of networked action-effect models, and enables exploration and simulation of many optimized scenarios along an efficient frontier of options. The data-driven strategies produced by these tools can be executed by the FICO® Blaze Advisor® system or one of our Decision Management applications. FICO’s solution for creating or executing optimization solutions is available on-premises or in the cloud.
COMPETITION
The market for our advanced solutions is intensely competitive and is constantly changing. Our competitors vary in size and in the scope of the products and services they offer. We encounter competition from a number of sources, including:
in-house analytic and systems developers;
scoring model builders;
enterprise resource planning and customer relationship management packaged solutions providers;
business intelligence solutions providers;
business process management and decision rules management providers;
providers of credit reports and credit scores;
providers of automated application processing services;
data vendors;
neural network developers and artificial intelligence system builders;
third-party professional services and consulting organizations;
providers of account/workflow management software;
software companies supplying predictive analytic modeling, rules, or analytic development tools; collections and recovery solutions providers; entity resolution and social network analysis solutions providers; and
providers of cloud-based customer engagement and risk management solutions.
We believe our competitors are presently unable to provide the mix of products, expertise in predictive analytics and their integration with decision management software, and enhanced customer management capabilities that we are able to deliver. However, certain competitors may have larger shares of particular geographic or product markets than we do.
Applications
The competition for our Applications varies by both application and industry.
In the marketing services market, we compete with Acxiom, Epsilon,Pegasystems, Equifax, Experian, Harte-Hanks, InfoUSA, KnowledgeBase, MerkleSAS, Adobe and TargetBase,Salesforce, among others. We also compete with traditional advertising agencies and companies’ internal information technology and analytics departments.
In the customer origination market, we compete with Experian, Equifax, Moody’s, Meridian Link, and CGI, among others.
In the customer strategy management market, we compete with Experian and SAS, among others.
In the fraud managementand financial crimes market for banking, we compete primarily with Nice Actimize, a division of NICEExperian, BAE Systems Experian, Detica, a division of BAE,Applied Intelligence, SAS, ACI Worldwide, IBM, Feedzai and ACI Worldwide. In the fraud solutions market for health care insurance, we compete with Emdeon, OptumInsight, ViPS, MedStat, Detica, a division of BAE, SAS, Verisk Analytics and IBM. Verisk Analytics and SAS also compete in the property and casualty insurance claims fraud market.Featurespace.
In the collections and recovery market, we compete with both outside suppliers and in-house scoring and computer systems departments for software and ASP servicing. Major competitors include CGI, Experian, and various boutique firms, along with the three major U.S. credit reporting agencies and Experian-Scorex for scoring and optimization projects.various boutique firms.
Scores
In this segment, we compete with both outside suppliers and in-house analytics departments for scoring business. Primary competitors among outside suppliers of scoring models are the three major credit reporting agencies in the U.S. and Canada, which are also our partners in offering our scoring solutions, Experian, TransUnion and TransUnion International, Equifax, and VantageScore (a joint venture entity established by the major U.S. credit reporting agencies). Additional competitors include CRIF and other credit reporting agencies outside the U.S., and other data providers like LexisNexis and ChoicePoint, some of which also represent FICOare among our partners.
For our direct-to-consumer“direct-to-consumer” services that deliver credit scores, credit reports and consumer credit education services, we compete with other direct to consumer credit and identity services.
Decision Management Software
Our primary competitors in this segment include IBM, Experian, SAS, Pegasystems and Angoss.Gurobi, along with a number of smaller, specialized vendors providing industry-specific solutions.
Competitive Factors
We believe the principal competitive factors affecting our markets include: technical performance; access to unique proprietary databases; availability in SaaS format; product attributes like adaptability, scalability, interoperability, functionality and ease-of-use; product price; customer service and support; the effectiveness of sales and marketing efforts; existing market penetration; and reputation. Although we believe our products and services compete favorably with respect to these factors, we may not be able to maintain our competitive position against current and future competitors.
MARKETS AND CUSTOMERS
Our products and services serve clients in multiple industries, including primarily banking, insurance, retail, healthcare and public agencies. End users of our products include 9896 of the 100 largest financial institutions in the U.S., and two-thirds of the largest 100 banks in the world. Our clients also include more than 700600 insurers, including nine of the top ten U.S. property and casualty insurers; more than 400300 retailers and general merchandisers, includingmerchandisers; more than one-third of the top 100 U.S. retailers; more than 150200 government or public agencies; and more than 150200 healthcare and pharmaceuticals companies, including sevennine of the world’s top ten pharmaceuticals companies. AllEight of the top ten companies on the 2017 2020 Fortune 500 list use FICO’sone or more of our solutions. In addition, our consumer services are marketed to an estimated 200 million U.S. consumers whose credit relationships are reported to the three major U.S. credit reporting agencies.
In the U.S., we market our products and services primarily through our own direct sales organization that is organized around vertical markets. Sales groups are based in our headquarters and in field offices strategically located both in and outside the U.S. We also market our products through indirect channels, including alliance partners and other resellers.
Our scores are marketed and sold through credit reporting agencies. During fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, revenues generated from our agreements with Experian, TransUnion and Equifax collectively accounted for 20%32%, 19%29% and 16%25% of our total revenues, respectively.
Outside the U.S., we market our products and services primarily through our subsidiary sales organizations. Our subsidiaries license and support our products in their local countries as well as within other foreign countries where we do not operate through a direct sales subsidiary. We also market our products through resellers and independent distributors in international territories not covered by our subsidiaries'subsidiaries’ direct sales organizations.
Our largest market segments outside the U.S. are the United Kingdom and Canada. In addition, we have delivered products to users in more than 100120 countries.
Revenues from international customers, including end users and resellers, amounted to 36%, 36% and 40% of our total revenues in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 17 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a summary of our operating segments and geographic information.
TECHNOLOGY
We specialize in analytics software and decision management technologies that analyze data and drive decision strategies and customer engagement. We maintain active research in a number of fields for the purposes of deriving greater insight and predictive value from data, making various forms of data more usable and valuable to the model-building process, and automating and applying analytics to the various business processes involved in making high-volume decisions in real time.
We are widely recognized as a leader in predictive analytics due to our pioneering work in credit scoring and fraud detection. We believe that our tools and processes are among the very best commercially available, and that we are uniquely able to integrate advanced analytic, software and data technologies into mission-critical business solutions that offer superior returns on investment.
In fiscal 2017,2020, we continued to make progress with our FICO® Analytic Cloud Decision Management Suite and FICO® Decision Management Platform initiatives. Most significantly for the fiscal year, we added new Platform Service functionality to provide cross-application enablement of centralized services (for example, enabling authentication, provisioning, data ingestion, and similar functions). We have madeseen initial success in delivering platform-centric solutions that provide unique value to enterprise clients in tracking and visualizing a buyer’s journey across otherwise siloed offerings.
In addition, we continue to expand the integration of capabilities that make many of our software solutions, which were previously available only as on-premises software installations, into SaaS solutions hosted on our cloud.the FICO® Analytic Cloud and/or in AWS. The FICO® Decision Management Suite enables clients to use FICO tools, along with rapid application development tools and visualization tools, to quickly develop their own decision management applications and services. We continue to add functionality to the platform as well as host additional FICO applications in the cloud. These ongoing initiatives are driven by enhancing our core technical capabilities listed below, and extending them through partnerships with other technology providers as well as through employing open source software.
Principal Areas of Expertise
Predictive Modeling. Predictive modeling identifies and mathematically represents underlying relationships in historical data in order to explain the data and make predictions or classifications about future events. Our models summarize large quantities of data to amplify its value. Predictive models typically analyze current and historical data on individuals to produce easily understood metrics such as scores. These scores rank-order individuals by likely future performance, e.g., their likelihood of making credit payments on time, or of responding to a particular offer for services. We also include in this category models that detect the likelihood of a transaction being fraudulent. Our predictive models are frequently operationalized in mission-critical transactional systems and drive decisions and actions in near real time. A number of analytic methodologies underlie our products in this area. These include proprietary applications of both linear and nonlinear mathematical programming algorithms, in which one objective is optimized within a set of constraints, and advanced neural systems, which learn complex patterns from large data sets to predict the probability that a new individual will exhibit certain behaviors of business interest. We also apply various related statistical techniques for analysis and pattern detection within large datasets, and have enhanced our abilities to derive insights and predictive variables from various forms of so-called big data, including unstructured data, such as text. We have enhanced our predictive analytic capabilities to include the development of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence. FICO has focused on making artificial intelligence explainable to auditors, developers and decision makers so that it can be deployed responsibly.
Decision Analysis and Optimization. Decision analysis refers to the broad quantitative field that deals with modeling, analyzing and optimizing decisions made by individuals, groups and organizations. Whereas predictive models analyze multiple aspects of individual behavior to forecast future behavior, decision analysis analyzes multiple aspects of a given decision to identify the most effective action to take to reach a desired result. We have developed an integrated approach to decision analysis that incorporates the development of a decision model that mathematically maps the entire decision structure; proprietary optimization technology that identifies the most effective strategies, given both the performance objective and constraints; the development of designed testing required for active, continuous learning; and the robust extrapolation of an optimized strategy to a wider set of scenarios than historically encountered. Our optimization capabilities also include a proprietary mathematical modeling and programming language, an easy-to-use development environment, and a state-of-the-art set of optimization algorithms.
Transaction Profiling. Transaction profiling is a patent-protected technique used to extract meaningful information and reduce the complexity of transaction data used in modeling. Many of our products operate using transactional data, such as credit card purchase transactions, or other types of data that change over time. In its raw form, this data is very difficult to use in predictive models for several reasons. First, an isolated transaction contains very little information about the behavior of the individual who generated the transaction. In addition, transaction patterns change rapidly over time. Finally, this type of data can often be highly complex. To overcome these issues, we have developed a set of techniques that transform raw transactional data into a mathematical representation that reveals latent information, and which make the data more usable by predictive models. This profiling technology accumulates data across multiple transactions of many types to create and update profiles of transaction patterns. These profiles enable our neural network models to efficiently and effectively make accurate assessments of, for example, fraud risk and credit risk within real-time transaction streams.
Customer Data Integration. Decisions made on customers or prospects can benefit from data stored in multiple sources, both inside and outside the enterprise. We have focused on developing data integration processes that are able to assemble and integrate those disparate data sources into a unified view of the customer or household, through the application of persistent keying technology. This data can include structured or unstructured data. Recent innovations include a solution that can integrate multiple data sources in real time and make them available for analysis and decisions.
Decision Management Software. In order to make a decision strategy operational, various steps and rules need to be programmed or exported into the business's software infrastructure, where they can communicate with front-end, customer-facing systems and back-end systems such as billing systems. We have developed software systems, sometimes known as decision engines and decision rules management systems, which perform the necessary functions to execute a decision strategy. Our software includes very efficient programs for these functions, facilitating, for example, business user definition of extremely complex decision strategies using graphical user interfaces; simultaneous testing of hundreds of decision strategies in “champion/challenger” (test/control) mode; high-volume processing and analysis of transactions in real time; integration of multiple data sources; and execution of predictive models for improved behavior forecasts and finer segmentation. Decision management software is an integral part of our decision management applications, described earlier.
Customer Engagement. We have advanced technology for customer engagement, which enables the execution of decisions and customer contact through SMS, email, automated voice, mobile applications and other channels. This technology enables FICO to extend decision management beyond the rendering of the decision to the final resolution with a customer, using the most effective method of communication for a given event and customer. Integrating this technology with our decision management systems has proven to decrease costs, improve staff efficiency, increase customer satisfaction and improve the return from marketing, fraud and collections activities.
Social Network Analysis. Analytics. We have advanced technology for identity resolution and social network analysis, which enables users to understand the relationships between their organization, customers, events, and third-party actors. Businesses can perform real-time searches across their enterprise data to find, match, and link similar entities and uncover hidden relationshiprelationships between people, places and things. This technology complements FICO’s capabilities in the area of fraud and marketingfinancial crime analytics.
Cybersecurity. We continue to seek projects in the cybersecurityIdentity and security information and event management space that leverage FICO’s streaming analytics, transaction profiling and unsupervised modeling technologies. These technologies include those successfully leveraged by our fraud management systems, including the FICO® Falcon® Platform, and new methods we believe to be unique approaches for detecting certain types of cyber security threats.
Research and Development Activities
Our research and development expenses were $110.9 million, $103.7 million and $98.8 million in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We believe that our future success depends on our ability to continually maintain and improve our core technologies, enhance our existing products, and develop new products and technologies that meet an expanding range of markets and customer requirements. In the development of new products and enhancements to existing products, we use our own development tools extensively.
Authentication.We have traditionally relied primarily onadvanced technology for digital identity verification and authentication. As part of a unified digital identity suite, this technology provides a mobile and seamless method for validating identities during the internal developmentcustomer onboarding process, and enrolling them as trusted entities for multifactor, biometric and behavioral authentication across digital interactions. It also helps organizations take a balanced approach to security and the user experience, providing easy-to-use, integrated security across the customer lifecycle.
PRODUCT PROTECTION AND TRADEMARKS
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and confidentiality agreements and procedures to protect our proprietary rights.
We retain the title to and protect the suite of models and software used to develop scoring models as a trade secret. We also restrict access to our source code and limit access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. We have generally relied upon the laws protecting trade secrets and upon contractual nondisclosure safeguards and restrictions on transferability to protect our software and proprietary interests in our product and service methodology and know-how. Our confidentiality procedures include invention assignment and proprietary information agreements with our employees and independent contractors, and nondisclosure agreements with our distributors, strategic partners and customers. We also claim copyright protection for certain proprietary software and documentation.
We have patents on many of our technologies and have patent applications pending on other technologies. The patents we hold may not be upheld as valid and may not prevent the development of competitive products. In addition, patents may never be issued on our pending patent applications or on any future applications that we may submit. We currently hold 166184 U.S. and 1716 foreign patents with 86102 applications pending.
Despite our precautions, it may be possible for competitors or users to copy or reproduce aspects of our software or to obtain information that we regard as trade secrets. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S. Patents and other protections for our intellectual property are important, but we believe our success and growth will depend principally on such factors as the knowledge, ability, experience and creative skills of our personnel, new products, frequent product enhancements and name recognition.
We have developed technologies for research projects conducted under agreements with various U.S. government agencies or their subcontractors. Although we have acquired commercial rights to these technologies, the U.S. government typically retains ownership of intellectual property rights and licenses in the technologies that we develop under these contracts. In some cases, the U.S. government can terminate our rights to these technologies if we fail to commercialize them on a timely basis. In addition, under U.S. government contracts, the government may make the results of our research public, which could limit our competitive advantage with respect to future products based on funded research.
We have used, registered and/or applied to register certain trademarks and service marks for our technologies, products and services. We currently have 3634 trademarks registered in the U.S. and select foreign countries.
PERSONNEL
As of September 30, 2017,2020, we employed 3,2994,003 persons worldwide. Of these, 169175 full-time employees were located in our San Jose, California office, 366404 full-time employees were located in our San Diego, California office, 187170 full-time employees were located in our Roseville, Minnesota office, 166 full-time employees were located in our San Rafael, California office, 186 full-time employees were located in our Roseville, Minnesota office, 130129 full-time employees were located in our Fairfax, Virginia office, 7861,178 full-time employees were located in our India-based offices and 344379 full-time employees were located in our United Kingdom-based offices. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement other than to the extent mandated by applicable law in certain foreign jurisdictions, and no work stoppages have been experienced.were experienced during fiscal 2020.
Information regarding our executive officers is included in Item 10, Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Business, Market and Strategy Risks Related
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have negatively affected how we and our customers are operating our businesses. The duration of these effects, and the extent to which they will impact our future revenues, results of operations and overall financial performance, remain uncertain.
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected the global economy, leading to reduced consumer spending and lending activities and disruptions and volatility in the global capital markets. COVID-19 has caused shutdowns to businesses and cities worldwide and has disrupted supply chains, business operations, travel, and consumer confidence.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have temporarily closed the majorityof our offices (including our corporate headquarters in the United States) and implemented travel restrictions, both of which have disrupted how we operate our business. Due in part to anticipated post-pandemic workforce patterns, we have permanently closed certain non-core offices, reduced certain other office space and reduced our global workforce. Our Businessoperations may be further negatively affected by a range of external factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic that are not within our control. For example, many cities, counties, states, and countries may continue to impose a wide range of restrictions on our employees’, partners’ and customers’ physical movement to limit the spread of COVID-19. We have postponed, canceled or shifted certain of our customer, employee or industry events to virtual-only experiences and may continue to do so in the future. If the COVID-19 pandemic has a substantial impact on our employees’, partners’ or customers’ productivity or ability to collaborate, our results of operations and overall financial performance may be harmed.
The situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic is constantly evolving and both the short-term and long-term effects remain unknown. Our customers, and therefore our business and revenues, are sensitive to negative changes in general economic conditions and lending activities. The COVID-19 pandemic may affect the rate of spending on our solutions and could adversely affect our customers’ ability or willingness to purchase our products and services, cause prospective customers to change product selections or term commitments, delay or cancel their purchasing decisions, extend sales cycles, and potentially increase payment defaults, all of which could adversely affect our future revenues, results of operations and overall financial performance. We have seen evidence that COVID-19 has adversely affected certain segments and originations volume, which may impact future revenue. We are unable to accurately predict the complete impact that COVID-19 will have on our future results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows due to numerous uncertainties, including the severity and transmission rate of the virus, the duration of the outbreak, the extent and effectiveness of containment actions, the effectiveness of any medical treatment and prevention options, and the impact of these and other factors on us, our employees, customers, partners and vendors, and on worldwide and U.S. economic conditions. If we are not able to respond to and manage these impacts effectively, our business may be harmed to a material extent.
We continue to expand the pursuit of our Decision Management strategy, and we may not be successful, which could cause our growth prospects and results of operations to suffer.
We continue to expand the pursuit of our business objective to become a leader in helping businesses automate and improve decisions across their enterprises, an approach that we commonly refer to as Decision Management, or “DM.” We have increasingly focused our DM strategy on bringing our Decision Management assets together in a flexible, extensible, and cloud-native platform approach (the FICO Decision Management Platform). Our DM strategy is designed to enable us to increase our business by selling multiple connectable and extensible DM products to clients, as well as to enable the development of custom client solutions that may leadand to opportunitiesallow our clients to develop new proprietary scores or other new proprietary products. Our DM strategy is also increasingly focused onmore easily expand their usage and the delivery of our products through cloud-based deployments.use cases they enable over time. The market may be unreceptive to our general DM business approach, including being unreceptive to our cloud-based offerings, unreceptive to purchasing multiple products from us, or unreceptive to our customized solutions, or unreceptive to our cloud-based offerings.solutions. As we continue to pursue our DM strategy, we may experience volatility in our revenues and operating results caused by various factors, including differences in revenue recognition treatment between our cloud-based offerings and on-premise software licenses, the timing of investments and other expenditures necessary to develop and operate our cloud-based offerings, and the adoption of new sales and delivery methods. If our DM strategy is not successful, we may not be able to grow our business, growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate, or our revenues and profits may decline.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from a small number of products and services, and if the market does not continue to accept these products and services, our revenues will decline.
We expect that revenues derived from our scoring solutions, fraud solutions, customer communication services, customer management solutions and decision management software will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable future. Our revenues will decline if the market does not continue to accept these products and services. Factors that might affect the market acceptance of these products and services include the following:
changes in the business analytics industry;
changes in technology;
our inability to obtain or use key data for our products;
saturation or contraction of market demand;
loss of key customers;
industry consolidation;
failure to successfully adopt cloud-based technologies;
our inability to obtain regulatory approvals for our products and services, including credit score models;
the increasing availability of free or relatively inexpensive consumer credit, credit score and other information from public or commercial sources;
failure to execute our selling approach; and
inability to successfully sell our products in new vertical markets.
Our revenues depend, to a great extent, upon conditions in the banking (including consumer credit) industry. If our clients’ industry experiences uncertainty, it will likely harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
During fiscal 2020, 86% of our revenues were derived from sales of products and services to the banking industry. Periods of global economic uncertainty experienced in the past have produced substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption of global credit and other financial markets, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or government assistance to, several major domestic and international financial institutions. The potential for future stress and disruptions, including in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, presents considerable risks to our businesses and operations. These risks include potential bankruptcies or credit deterioration of financial institutions, many of which are our customers. Such disruption would result in a decline in the revenue we receive from financial and other institutions. In addition, if consumer demand for financial services and products and the number of credit applications decrease, the demand for our products and services could also be materially reduced. These types of disruptions could lead to a decline in the volumes of services we provide our customers and could negatively impact our revenue and results of operations.
While the rate of account growth in the U.S. bankcard industry has been slow and many of our large institutional customers have consolidated in recent years, we have generated most of our revenue growth from our bankcard-related scoring and account management businesses by selling and cross-selling our products and services to large banks and other credit issuers. As the banking industry continues to experience contraction in the number of participating institutions, we may have fewer opportunities for revenue growth due to reduced or changing demand for our products and services that support customer acquisition programs of our customers. In addition, industry contraction could affect the base of recurring revenues derived from contracts in which we are paid on a per-transaction basis as formerly separate customers combine their operations under one contract. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent future revenue contraction or effectively promote future revenue growth in our businesses.
While we are attempting to expand our sales of consumer credit and banking products and services into international markets, the risks are greater as these markets are also experiencing substantial disruption and we are less well-known in them.
We rely on relatively few customers, as well as our contracts with the three major credit reporting agencies, for a significant portion of our revenues and profits. Many of our customers are significantly larger than we are and may have greater bargaining power. The businesses of our largest customers depend, in large part, on favorable macroeconomic conditions. If these customers are negatively impacted by weak global economic conditions, global economic volatility or the terms of these relationships otherwise change, our revenues and operating results could decline.
Most of our customers are relatively large enterprises, such as banks, payment card processors, insurance companies, healthcare firms, telecommunications providers, retailers and public agencies. As a result, many of our customers and potential customers are significantly larger than we are and may have sufficient bargaining power to demand reduced prices and favorable nonstandard terms.
In addition, the U.S. and other key international economies are experiencing and have experienced in the past a downturn in which economic activity was impacted by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, poor liquidity, reduced corporate profitability, volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets, bankruptcies and overall uncertainty with respect to the economy. The potential for economic disruption presents considerable risks to our business, including potential bankruptcies or credit deterioration of financial institutions with which we have substantial relationships. Such disruption, whether arising in connection with the current COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, could result in a decline in the volume of transactions that we execute for our customers.
We also derive a substantial portion of our revenues and operating income from our contracts with the three major credit reporting agencies, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax, and other parties that distribute our products to certain markets. The loss of or a significant change in a relationship with one of these credit reporting agencies with respect to their distribution of our products or with respect to our myFICO® offerings, the loss of or a significant change in a relationship with a major customer, the loss of or a significant change in a relationship with a significant third-party distributor (including payment card processors), or the delay of significant revenues from these sources, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.
If we are unable to access new markets or develop new distribution channels, our business and growth prospects could suffer.
We expect that part of the growth that we seek to achieve through our DM strategy will be derived from the sale of DM products and service solutions in industries and markets we do not currently serve. We also expect to grow our business by delivering our DM solutions through additional distribution channels. If we fail to penetrate these industries and markets to the degree we anticipate utilizing our DM strategy, or if we fail to develop additional distribution channels, we may not be able to grow our business, growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate, or our revenues and profits may decline.
If we are unable to develop successful new products or if we experience defects, failures and delays associated with the introduction of new products, our business could suffer serious harm.
Our growth and the success of our DM strategy depend upon our ability to develop and sell new products or suites of products, including the development and sale of our cloud-based product offerings. If we are unable to develop new products, or if we are not successful in introducing new products, we may not be able to grow our business or growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate. In addition, significant undetected errors or delays in new products or new versions of products may affect market acceptance of our products and could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. In the past, we have experienced delays while developing and introducing new products and product enhancements, primarily due to difficulties developing models, acquiring data, and adapting to particular operating environments or certain client or other systems. We have also experienced errors or “bugs” in our software products, despite testing prior to release of the products. Software errors in our products could affect the ability of our products to work with other hardware or software products, could delay the development or release of new products or new versions of products, and could adversely affect market acceptance of our products. Errors or defects in our products that are significant, or are perceived to be significant, could result in rejection of our products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenues, diversion of development resources, an increase in product liability claims, and increases in service and support costs and warranty claims.
Our ability to increase our revenues will depend to some extent upon introducing new products and services. If the marketplace does not accept these new products and services, our revenues may decline.
To increase our revenues, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and new versions of existing products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We believe much of the future growth of our business and the success of our DM strategy will rest on our ability to continue to expand into newer markets for our products and services. Such areas are relatively new to our product development and sales and marketing personnel. Products that we plan to market in the future are in various stages of development. We cannot assure you that the marketplace will accept these products. If our current or potential customers are not willing to switch to or adopt our new products and services, either as a result of the quality of these products and services or due to other factors, such as economic conditions, our revenues will decrease.
If we fail to keep up with rapidly changing technologies, our products could become less competitive or obsolete.
In our markets, technology changes rapidly, and there are continuous improvements in computer hardware, network operating systems, programming tools, programming languages, operating systems, database technologies, cloud-based technologies and the use of the Internet. If we fail to enhance our current products and develop new products in response to changes in technology or industry standards, or if we fail to bring product enhancements or new product developments to market quickly enough, our products could rapidly become less competitive or obsolete. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to:
innovate by internally developing new and competitive technologies;
use leading third-party technologies effectively;
continue to develop our technical expertise;
anticipate and effectively respond to changing customer needs;
initiate new product introductions in a way that minimizes the impact of customers delaying purchases of existing products in anticipation of new product releases; and
influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes.
Our product and pricing strategies may not be successful. If our competitors introduce new products and pricing strategies, it could decrease our product sales and market share, or could pressure us to reduce our product prices in a manner that reduces our margins.
Demand for our products and services may be sensitive to product and pricing changes we implement, and our product and pricing strategies may not be accepted by the market. If our customers fail to accept our product and pricing strategies, our revenues, results of operations and business may suffer. In addition, we may not be able to compete successfully against our competitors, and this inability could impair our capacity to sell our products. The market for business analytics is rapidly evolving and highly competitive, and we expect competition in this market to persist and intensify. Our regional and global competitors vary in size and in the scope of the products and services they offer, and include:
in-house analytic and systems developers;
scoring model builders;
fraud and security management providers;
enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, and customer communication and mobility solution providers;
business intelligence solutions providers;
credit report and credit score providers;
business process management and decision rules management providers;
process modeling tools providers;
automated application processing services providers;
data vendors;
neural network developers and artificial intelligence system builders;
third-party professional services and consulting organizations;
account/workflow management software providers;
software tools companies supplying modeling, rules, or analytic development tools; collections and recovery solutions providers; entity resolution and social network analysis solutions providers; and
cloud-based customer engagement and risk management solutions providers.
We rely on relatively few customers,expect to experience additional competition from other established and emerging companies, as well as our contracts with the three major credit reporting agencies, for a significant portionfrom other technologies. For example, certain of our revenuesfraud solutions products compete against other methods of preventing payment card fraud, such as payment cards that contain the cardholder’s photograph; smart cards; cardholder verification and profits.authentication solutions; biometric measures on devices including fingerprint and face matching; and other card authorization techniques and user verification techniques. Many of our customers are significantly largeranticipated competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing, professional services and other resources than we aredo, and may have greater bargaining power. The businessesindustry consolidation is creating even larger competitors in many of our largest customers depend, in large part, on favorable macroeconomic conditions. If these customers are negatively impacted by weak global economic conditions, global economic volatility or the terms of these relationships otherwise change, our revenues and operating results could decline.
Most of our customers are relatively large enterprises, such as banks, credit card processors, insurance companies, healthcare firms, telecommunications providers, retailers and public agencies.markets. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. They may also be able to devote greater resources than we can to develop, promote and sell their products. Many of these companies have extensive customer relationships, including relationships with many of our customerscurrent and potential customers are significantly larger than we arecustomers. Furthermore, new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and may have sufficient bargaining power to demand reduced prices and favorable nonstandard terms.
In addition, the U.S. and other key international economies have experienced in the past a downturn in which economic activity was impacted by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, poor liquidity, reduced corporate profitability, volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets, bankruptcies and overall uncertainty with respect to the economy. The European Union (“E.U.”) continues to face great economic uncertainty which could impact the overall world economy or various other regional economies. The potential for economic disruption presents considerable risks to our business, including potential bankruptcies or credit deterioration of financial institutions with which we have substantial relationships. Such disruption could result in a decline in the volume of transactions that we execute for our customers.
We also derive a substantial portion of our revenues and operating income from our contracts with the three major credit reporting agencies,rapidly gain significant market share. For example, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax have formed an alliance that has developed a credit scoring product competitive with our products. If we are unable to respond as quickly or effectively to changes in customer requirements as our competition, our ability to expand our business and other parties that distributesell our products will be negatively affected.
Our competitors may be able to certain markets. The losssell products competitive to ours at lower prices individually or as part of or a significant change in a relationshipintegrated suites of several related products. This ability may cause our customers to purchase products that directly compete with one of these credit reporting agencies with respect to their distribution of our products or with respectfrom our competitors. Price reductions by our competitors could negatively impact our margins, and could also harm our ability to our myFICO® offerings, the lossobtain new long-term contracts and renewals of or a significant change in a relationship with a major customer, the loss of or a significant change in a relationship with a significant third-party distributor (including credit card processors), or the delay of significant revenues from these sources, could have a material adverse effectexisting long-term contracts on our revenues and results of operations.favorable terms.
We rely on relationships with third parties for marketing, distribution and certain services.If we experience difficulties in these relationships, including competition from these third parties, our future revenues may be adversely affected.
Most of our products rely on distributors, and we intend to continue to market and distribute our products through existing and future distributor relationships. Our Scores segment relies on, among others, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax. Failure of our existing and future distributors to generate significant revenues or otherwise perform their expected services or functions, demands by such distributors to change the terms on which they offer our products, or our failure to establish additional distribution or sales and marketing alliances, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, certain of our distributors presently compete with us and may compete with us in the future, either by developing competitive products themselves or by distributing competitive offerings. For example, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax have developed a credit scoring product to compete directly with our products and are collectively attempting to sell the product. Competition from distributors or other sales and marketing partners could significantly harm sales of our products and services.
Our acquisition and divestiture activities may disrupt our ongoing business and may involve increased expenses, and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals contemplated at the time of a transaction.
We have acquired and expect to continue to acquire companies, businesses, products, services and technologies. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including:
our ongoing business may be disrupted and our management’s attention may be diverted by acquisition, transition or integration activities;
an acquisition may not further our business strategy as we expected, we may not integrate acquired operations or technology as successfully as we expected or we may overpay for our investments, or otherwise not realize the expected return, which could adversely affect our business or operating results;
we may be unable to retain the key employees, customers and other business partners of the acquired operation;
we may have difficulties entering new markets where we have no or limited direct prior experience or where competitors may have stronger market positions;
our operating results or financial condition may be adversely impacted by known or unknown claims or liabilities we assume fromin an acquired company, business, productacquisition or technology,that are imposed on us as a result of an acquisition, including claims by government agencies or authorities, terminated employees, current or former customers, former stockholders or other third parties; pre-existing contractual relationships of an acquired company we would not have otherwise entered into; unfavorable revenue recognition or other accounting treatment as a result of an acquired company’s practices; and intellectual property claims or disputes;
we may fail to identify or assess the magnitude of certain liabilities or other circumstances prior to acquiring a company, business, product or technology, which could result in unexpected litigation or regulatory exposure, unfavorable accounting treatment, unexpected increases in taxes due, a loss of anticipated tax benefits or other adverse effects on our business, operating results or financial condition;
we may not realize the anticipated increase in our revenues from an acquisition for a number of reasons, including if a larger than predicted number of customers decline to renew their contracts, if we are unable to incorporate the acquired technologies or products with our existing product lines in a uniform manner, if we are unable to sell the acquired products to our customer base or if contract models of an acquired company or changes in accounting treatment do not allow us to recognize revenues on a timely basis;
we may have difficulty incorporating acquired technologies or products with our existing product lines and maintaining uniform standards, architecture, controls, procedures and policies;
our use of cash to pay for acquisitions may limit other potential uses of our cash, including stock repurchases, dividend payments and retirement of outstanding indebtedness; and
to the extent we issue a significant amount of equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease; anddecrease.
we may experience additional or unexpected changes in how we are required to account for our acquisitions pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including arrangements we assume from an acquisition.
We have also divested ourselves of businesses in the past and may do so again in the future. Divestitures involve significant risks and uncertainties, including:
disruption of our ongoing business;
reductions of our revenues or earnings per share;
unanticipated liabilities, legal risks and costs;
the potential loss of key personnel;
distraction of management from our ongoing business; and
impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of migrating a business to new owners.
Because acquisitions and divestitures are inherently risky, our transactions may not be successful and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Acquisitions of businesses having a significant presence outside the U.S. will increase our exposure to the risks of conducting operations in international markets.
Charges to earnings resulting from acquisitions may adversely affectThere can be no assurance that strategic divestitures will provide business benefits.
As part of our operating results.
Under business combination accounting standards,strategy, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in acquired companies generally at their acquisition-date fair values and separately from goodwill. Goodwill is measured as the excess amountcontinuously evaluate our portfolio of consideration transferred, which is also generally measured at fair value, and the net of the amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain. After we complete an acquisition, the following factors could result in material charges and adversely affect our operating resultsbusinesses. We have previously and may adversely affect our cash flows:
impairment of goodwill or intangible assets, or a reduction in the useful lives of intangible assets acquired;
amortization of intangible assets acquired;
identification of, orfuture make other changes to assumed contingent liabilities, both income taxour portfolio as well, which may be material. Divestitures involve risks, including:
disruption of our operations or businesses;
reductions of our revenues or earnings per share;
difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products and non-income tax related, after our final determinationpersonnel;
finding a suitable purchaser;
disposing of the amounts for these contingenciesbusinesses or the conclusion of the measurement period (generally up to one year from the acquisition date), whichever comes first;
costs incurred to combine the operations of companies we acquire, such as transitional employee expenses and employee retention, redeploymentassets at a price or relocation expenses;
charges to our operating results to maintain certain duplicative pre-merger activities for an extended period of time or to maintain these activities for a period of timeon terms that is longerare less favorable than we had anticipated, chargesor with purchase price adjustments or the exclusion of assets or liabilities that must be divested, managed or run off separately;
diversion of management's attention from our other businesses;
the potential loss of key personnel;
adverse effects on relationships with our suppliers or their businesses,
the erosion of employee morale or customer confidence; and
the retention of contingent liabilities related to eliminate certain duplicative pre-merger activities,the divested business.
If we do not successfully manage the risks associated with divestitures, our business, financial condition, and chargesresults of operations could be adversely affected as the potential strategic benefits may not be realized or may take longer to restructure our operations or to reduce our cost structure; andrealize than expected.
charges to our operating results resulting from expenses incurred to effect the acquisition.
Substantially all of these costs will be accounted for as expenses that will decrease our net income and earnings per share for the periods in which those costs are incurred. Charges to our operating results in any given period could differ substantially from other periods based on the timing and size of our future acquisitions and the extent of integration activities. A more detailed discussion of our accounting for business combinations and other items is presented in the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 7).
Our reengineering initiativeefforts may cause our growth prospects and profitability to suffer.
As part of our management approach, we implemented anpursue ongoing reengineering initiativeefforts designed to grow revenues through strategic resource allocation and improve profitability through cost reductions. OurFor example, in September 2020, we implemented a course of action designed to reduce our operating costs in lower value, less strategic areas of our business in order to facilitate incremental investment in higher value, more strategic areas while also reducing our facilities footprint in light of anticipated post-pandemic workforce patterns. These and other reengineering initiativeefforts may not be successful over the long term as a result of our failureshould we fail to reduce expenses at the anticipated level, or a lower,should we fail to increase revenues to anticipated levels or no, positive impact on revenues from strategic resource allocation. at all. If our reengineering initiative isefforts are not successful over the long term, our revenues, results of operations and business may suffer.
The occurrenceWe will continue to rely upon proprietary technology rights, and if we are unable to protect them, our business could be harmed.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology and other intellectual property rights. To date, we have relied primarily on a combination of certain negative events may cause fluctuations incopyright, patent, trade secret, and trademark laws, and nondisclosure and other contractual restrictions on copying and distribution, to protect our stock price.
The market priceproprietary technology. This protection of our common stockproprietary technology is limited, and our proprietary technology could be used by others without our consent. In addition, patents may not be issued with respect to our pending or future patent applications, and our patents may not be upheld as valid or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Any disclosure, loss, invalidity of, or failure to protect our intellectual property could negatively impact our competitive position, and ultimately, our business. There can be no assurance that our protection of our intellectual property rights in the U.S. or abroad will be adequate or that others, including our competitors, will not use our proprietary technology without our consent. Furthermore, litigation may be volatilenecessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Some of our technologies were developed under research projects conducted under agreements with various U.S. government agencies or subcontractors. Although we have commercial rights to these technologies, the U.S. government typically retains ownership of intellectual property rights and licenses in the technologies developed by us under these contracts, and in some cases can terminate our rights in these technologies if we fail to commercialize them on a timely basis. Under these contracts with the U.S. government, the results of research may be subjectmade public by the government, limiting our competitive advantage with respect to wide fluctuations duefuture products based on our research.
Operational Risks
If our cybersecurity measures are compromised or unauthorized access to customer or consumer data is otherwise obtained, our products and services may be perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or cease their use of our products and services, our reputation may be damaged and we could incur significant liabilities.
Because our business requires the storage, transmission and utilization of sensitive consumer and customer information, we will continue to routinely be the target of attempted cybersecurity and other security threats by outside third parties, including technically sophisticated and well-resourced bad actors attempting to access or steal the data we store. Many of our products are provided by us through the Internet. We may be exposed to additional cybersecurity threats as we migrate our data from our legacy systems to cloud-based solutions. We operate in an environment of significant risk of cybersecurity incidents resulting from unintentional events or deliberate attacks by third parties or insiders, which may involve exploiting highly obscure security vulnerabilities or sophisticated attack methods. These threats include phishing attacks on our email systems and other cyber-attacks, including state-sponsored cyber-attacks, industrial espionage, insider threats, denial-of-service attacks, computer viruses, ransomware and other malware, payment fraud or other cyber incidents.
Cybersecurity breaches could expose us to a numberrisk of factors, including variations in our revenues and operating results. We believe that you should not rely on period-to-period comparisonsloss, the unauthorized disclosure of financial results as an indication of future performance. Because many of our operating expenses are fixed and will not be affected by short-term fluctuations in revenues, short-term fluctuations in revenues may significantly impact operating results. Additional factors that may cause our stock price to fluctuate include the following:
variability in demand from our existing customers;
failure to meet the expectations of market analysts;
changes in recommendations by market analysts;
the lengthy and variable sales cycle of many products, combined with the relatively large size of orders for our products, increases the likelihood of short-term fluctuation in revenues;
consumer or customer dissatisfaction with,information, significant litigation, regulatory fines, penalties, loss of customers or problems caused by,reputational damage, indemnity obligations and other liability. If our cybersecurity measures are breached as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and as a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to our systems or to consumer or customer information, sensitive data may be accessed, stolen, disclosed or lost, our reputation may be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Because the performancetechniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, or even for some time after, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques, implement adequate preventative measures or remediate any intrusion on a timely or effective basis. Because a successful breach of our products;computer systems, software, networks or other technology asset could occur and persist for an extended period of time before being detected, we may not be able to immediately address the consequences of a cybersecurity incident.
Malicious third parties may also conduct attacks designed to temporarily deny customers, distributors and vendors access to our systems and services. Cybersecurity breaches experienced by our vendors, by our distributors, by our customers or by us may trigger governmental notice requirements and public disclosures, which may lead to widespread negative publicity. Any such cybersecurity breach, whether actual or perceived, could harm our reputation, erode customer confidence in the timing of new product announcements and introductions in comparison with our competitors;
the leveleffectiveness of our operating expenses;
changes in competitive and other conditions in the consumer credit, banking and insurance industries;
fluctuations in domestic and international economic conditions;
security measures, negatively impact our ability to complete large installations,attract new customers, cause existing customers to curtail or cease their use of our products and services, cause regulatory or industry changes that impact our products and services, or subject us to adoptthird-party lawsuits, regulatory fines or other action or liability, all of which could materially and configure cloud-based deployments, on schedule and within budget;
acquisition-related expenses and charges; and
timing of orders for and deliveries of software systems.
In addition, the financial markets have at various times experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the stock prices of many technology companies and financial services companies, and these fluctuations sometimes have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Broad market fluctuations, as well as industry-specific and general economic conditions, may negativelyadversely affect our business and require usoperating results. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic may cause increased cybersecurity risk, as cybercriminals attempt to record an impairment charge related to goodwill,capitalize from the disruption, including remote working arrangements.
If we experience business interruptions or failure of our information technology and communication systems, the availability of our products and services could be interrupted which could adversely affect our reputation, business and financial condition.
Our ability to provide reliable service in our businesses depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our data centers, information technology and communication systems, and increasingly those of our external service providers. As we continue to grow our SaaS business, our dependency on the continuing operation and availability of these systems increases. Our systems and data centers, and those of our external service providers, could be exposed to damage or interruption. These interruptions can include software or hardware malfunctions, communication failures, outages or other failures of third party environments or service providers, fires, floods, earthquakes, pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic), war, terrorist acts or civil unrest, power losses, equipment failures, computer viruses, denial-of-service or other cybersecurity attacks, employee or insider malfeasance, human error and other events beyond our control. Although we have taken steps to prevent system failures and we have installed back-up systems and procedures to prevent or reduce disruption, such steps may not be sufficient to prevent an interruption of services and our disaster recovery planning may not account for all eventualities.
An operational failure or outage in any of these systems, or damage to or destruction of these systems, which causes disruptions in our services, could result in loss of customers, damage to customer relationships, reduced revenues and profits, refunds of customer charges and damage to our brand and reputation and may require us to incur substantial additional expense to repair or replace damaged equipment and recover data loss caused by the interruption. Any one or more of the foregoing occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, stock price and business.operations.
Our products have long and variable sales cycles. If we do not accurately predict these cycles, we may not forecast our financial results accurately, and our stock price could be adversely affected.
We experience difficulty in forecasting our revenues accurately because the length of our sales cycles makes it difficult for us to predict the quarter in which sales will occur. In addition, our selling approach is complex as we look to sell multiple products and services across our customers’ organizations. This makes forecasting of revenues in any given period more difficult. As a result of our sales approach and lengthening sales cycles, revenues and operating results may vary significantly from period to period. For example, the sales cycle for licensing our products typically ranges from 60 days to 18 months. Customers are often cautious in making decisions to acquire our products because purchasing our products typically involves a significant commitment of capital and may involve shifts by the customer to a new software and/or hardware platform or changes in the customer’s operational procedures. This may cause customers, particularly those experiencing financial stress, to make purchasing decisions more cautiously. Delays in completing sales can arise while customers complete their internal procedures to approve large capital expenditures and test and accept our applications. Consequently, we face difficulty predicting the quarter in which sales to expected customers will occur and experience fluctuations in our revenues and operating results. If we are unable to accurately forecast our revenues, our stock price could be adversely affected.
We typically have revenue-generating transactions concentrated in the final weeks of a quarter, which may prevent accurate forecasting of our financial results and cause our stock price to decline.
Large portions of our customer agreements are consummated in the weeks immediately preceding quarter end. Before these agreements are consummated, we create and rely on forecasted revenues for planning, modeling and earnings guidance. Forecasts, however, are only estimates and actual results may vary for a particular quarter or longer periods of time. Consequently, significant discrepancies between actual and forecasted results could limit our ability to plan, budget or provide accurate guidance, which could adversely affect our stock price. Any publicly-stated revenue or earnings projections are subject to this risk.
The failure to recruit and retain additional qualified personnel could hinder our ability to successfully manage our business.
Our DM strategy and our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain experienced sales, consulting, research and development, marketing, technical support and management personnel. The complexity of our products requires highly trained customer servicepersonnel for research and technical support personneldevelopment and to assist customers with product installation, deployment, maintenance and deployment.support. The labor market for these individuals is very competitive due to the limited number of people available with the necessary technical skills and understanding and may become more competitive with general market and economic improvement. We cannot be certain that our compensation strategies will be perceived as competitive by current or prospective employees. This could impair our ability to recruit and retain personnel. We have experienced difficulty in recruiting qualified personnel, especially technical, sales and consulting personnel, and we may need additional staff to support new customers and/or increased customer needs. We may also recruit skilled technical professionals from other countries to work in the U.S., and from the U.S. and other countries to work abroad. Limitations imposed by immigration laws in the U.S. and abroad and the availability of visas in the countries where we do business could hinder our ability to attract necessary qualified personnel and harm our business and future operating results. There is a risk that even if we invest significant resources in attempting to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, we will not succeed in our efforts, and our business could be harmed. The failure of the value of our stock to appreciate may adversely affect our ability to use equity and equity-based incentive plans to attract and retain personnel, and may require us to use alternative and more expensive forms of compensation for this purpose.
The failure to obtain certain forms of model construction data from our customers or others could harm our business.
Our business requires that we develop or obtain a reliable source of sufficient amounts of current and statistically relevant data to analyze transactions and update our products. In most cases, these data must be periodically updated and refreshed to enable our products to continue to work effectively in a changing environment. We do not own or control much of the data that we require, most of which is collected privately and maintained in proprietary databases. Customers and key business alliancespartners provide us with the data we require to analyze transactions, report results and build new models. Our DM strategy depends in part upon our ability to access new forms of data to develop custom and proprietary analytic tools. If we fail to maintain sufficient data sourcing relationships with our customers and business alliances,partners, or if they decline to provide such data due to privacy, concerns,security, competition or regulatory concerns, prohibitions or a lack of permission from their customers or partners, we could lose access to required data and our products, and the development of new products, might become less effective. We could also become subject to increased legislative, regulatory or judicial restrictions or mandates on the collection, disclosure or use of such data, in particular if such data is not collected by our providers in a way that allows us to legally use the data. Third parties have asserted copyright and other intellectual property interests in these data, and these assertions, if successful, could prevent us from using these data. We may not be successful in maintaining our relationships with these external data source providers or in continuing to obtain data from them on acceptable terms or at all. Any interruption of our supply of data could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Global Operational Risks
Material adverse developments in global economic conditions, or the occurrence of certain other world events, could affect demand for our products and services and harm our business.
Purchases of technology products and services and decisioning solutions are subject to adverse economic conditions. When an economy is struggling, companies in many industries delay or reduce technology purchases, and we experience softened demand for our decisioning solutions and other products and services. Global economic uncertainty in the past, and currently as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, has produced substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption of global credit and other financial markets. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected the global economy, leading to reduced consumer spending and lending activities and disruptions and volatility in the global capital markets. The pandemic has also caused shutdowns to businesses and cities worldwide and has disrupted supply chains, business operations, travel, and consumer confidence.
Economic uncertainty has and could continue to negatively affect the businesses and purchasing decisions of companies in the industries we serve. Such disruptions present considerable risks to our businesses and operations. As global economic conditions experience stress and negative volatility, or if there is an escalation in regional or global conflicts or terrorism, we will likely experience reductions in the number of available customers and in capital expenditures by our remaining customers, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of purchase commitments for our products and increased price competition, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and liquidity.
We willare subject to risks and uncertainties associated with the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the E.U., commonly referred to as “Brexit,” including implications for the free flow of labor and goods in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and the E.U. and other economic, financial, legal, tax and trade implications. Brexit could cause disruptions to and create uncertainty surrounding our business in the U.K., including affecting our relationships with our existing and future customers, suppliers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial results and operations. Brexit has caused, and may continue to rely upon proprietary technology rights,create, volatility in global stock markets and ifregional and global economic uncertainty, which may cause our customers to closely monitor their costs and reduce their spending budget on our products and services.
As a result of these conditions, risks and uncertainties, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur additional costs in order to compete in a changed business environment. Given the volatile nature of the global economic environment and the uncertainties underlying efforts to stabilize it, we may not timely anticipate or manage existing, new or additional risks, as well as contingencies or developments, which may include regulatory developments and trends in new products and services. Our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In operations outside the U.S., we are unablesubject to protect them, our business could be harmed.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology and other intellectual property rights. To date, we have relied primarily on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, and trademark laws, and nondisclosure and other contractual restrictions on copying and distribution, to protect our proprietary technology. This protection of our proprietary technology is limited, and our proprietary technology could be used by others without our consent. In addition, patentsadditional risks that may not be issued with respect to our pending or future patent applications, and our patents may not be upheld as valid or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Any disclosure, loss, invalidity of, or failure to protect our intellectual property could negatively impact our competitive position, and ultimately, our business. There can be no assurance that our protection of our intellectual property rights in the U.S. or abroad will be adequate or that others, including our competitors, will not use our proprietary technology without our consent. Furthermore, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
SomeA growing portion of our technologiesrevenues is derived from international sales. During fiscal 2020, 32% of our revenues were developed under research projects conducted under agreements with various U.S. government agencies or subcontractors. Although we have commercial rights to these technologies,derived from business outside the U.S. government typically retains ownershipAs part of intellectual property rightsour growth strategy, we plan to continue to pursue opportunities outside the U.S., including opportunities in countries with economic systems that are in early stages of development and licenses in the technologies developed by us under these contracts, and in some cases can terminate our rights in these technologies if we fail to commercialize them on a timely basis. Under these contracts with the U.S. government, the results of research may be made public by the government, limiting our competitive advantage with respect to future products based on our research.
If we are subject to infringement claims, it could harm our business.
We expect that products in the industry segments in which we compete, including software products, will increasingly be subject to claims of patent and other intellectual property infringement as the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grow. We may need to defend claims that our products infringe intellectual property rights, and as a result we may:
incur significant defense costs or substantial damages;
be required to cease the use or sale of infringing products;
expend significant resources to develop or license a substitute non-infringing technology;
discontinue the use of some technology; or
be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement, which license may not mature sufficiently to result in growth for our business. Accordingly, our future operating results could be available or might require substantial royalties or license fees that would reducenegatively affected by a variety of factors arising out of international commerce, some of which are beyond our margins.control. These factors include:
Moreover,general economic and political conditions in recent years, individuals and groups that are non-practicing entities, commonly referred to as “patent trolls”, have purchased patents and other intellectual property assets for the purpose of making claims of infringement in order to extract settlements. From time to time,countries where we may receive threatening letters or notices or may be the subject of claims that our solutions and underlying technology infringe or violate the intellectual property rights of others. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can be time consuming, costly to defend in litigation, divert management's attention and resources, damage our reputation and brand, and cause us to incur significant expenses.
If our security measures are compromised or unauthorized access to customer or consumer data is otherwise obtained,sell our products and services mayservices;
difficulty in staffing and efficiently managing our operations in multiple geographic locations and in various countries;
effects of a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including restrictions on access to personal information;
data privacy and consumer protection laws and regulations;
import and export licensing requirements;
longer payment cycles;
difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable;
reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
currency fluctuations;
unfavorable tax rules or changes in tariffs and other trade barriers;
the presence and acceptance of varying level of business corruption in international markets;
terrorism, war, natural disasters and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic; and
difficulties and delays in translating products and related documentation into foreign languages.
There can be perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or cease their useno assurance that we will be able to successfully address each of these challenges in the near term. Additionally, some of our productsbusiness will be conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and services, our reputation may be damaged and we could incur significant liabilities.
Our business requires the storage, transmission and utilization of sensitive consumer and customer information. Many of our productslosses are provided by us through the Internet. Security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss, the unauthorized disclosure of consumer or customer information, litigation, indemnity obligations and other liability. If our security measures are breached as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and as a result, someone obtains unauthorized accessnot currently material to our systemscash flows, financial position or to consumer or customer information, our reputation may be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Malicious third parties may also conduct attacks designed to temporarily deny customers access to our services. Security compromises experienced by our competitors, by our distributors, by our customers or by us may lead to public disclosures, which may lead to widespread negative publicity. Any security compromiseresults of operations. However, an increase in our industry, whether actual or perceived,foreign revenues could harm our reputation, erode customer confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures, negatively impact our ability to attract new customers, cause existing customers to curtail or cease their use of our products and services, cause regulatory or industry changes that impact our products and services, or subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines or other action or liability, allincreased foreign currency transaction risks in the future.
In addition to the risk of which could materiallydepending on international sales, we have risks incurred in having research and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Protection from system interruptions is important to our business. If we experience system interruptions, it could harm our business.
Systems or network interruptions, including interruptions experienceddevelopment personnel located in connection with our cloud-based and other product offerings, could delay and disrupt our ability to develop, deliver or maintain our products and services, causing harm to our business and reputation and resulting in loss of customers or revenue. These interruptions can include software or hardware malfunctions, communication failures, outages or other failures of third party environments or service providers, fires, floods, earthquakes, power losses, equipment failures and other events beyond our control.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Our ability to increase our revenues will depend to some extent upon introducing new products and services. If the marketplace does not accept these new products and services, our revenues may decline.
various international locations. We currently have a significant sharesubstantial portion of the available market in portions of our Scores segment and for certain services in our Applications segment, specifically, the markets for account management services at credit card processors and credit card fraud detection software. To increase our revenues, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and new versions of existing products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We believe much of the future growth of our business and the success of our DM strategy will rest on our ability to continue to expand into newer markets for our products and services. Such areas are relatively new to our product development staff in international locations, some of which have political and sales and marketing personnel. Products that we plan to market in the future are in various stages of development. We cannot assure you that the marketplace will accept these products.developmental risks. If our current or potential customers are not willing to switch to or adopt our new products and services, either as a result of the quality of these products and services or due to other factors, such as economic conditions, our revenues will decrease.
If we fail to keep up with rapidly changing technologies, our products could become less competitive or obsolete.
In our markets, technology changes rapidly, and there are continuous improvements in computer hardware, network operating systems, programming tools, programming languages, operating systems, database technologies, cloud-based technologies and the use of the Internet. If we fail to enhance our current products and develop new products in response to changes in technology or industry standards, or if we fail to bring product enhancements or new product developments to market quickly enough, our products could rapidly become less competitive or obsolete. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to:
innovate by internally developing new and competitive technologies;
use leading third-party technologies effectively;
continue to develop our technical expertise;
anticipate and effectively respond to changing customer needs;
initiate new product introductions in a way that minimizes the impact of customers delaying purchases of existing products in anticipation of new product releases; and
influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes.
If our competitors introduce new products and pricing strategies, it could decrease our product sales and market share, or could pressure us to reduce our product prices in a manner that reduces our margins.
We may not be able to compete successfully against our competitors, and this inability could impair our capacity to sell our products. The market for business analytics is new, rapidly evolving and highly competitive, and we expect competition in this market to persist and intensify. Our regional and global competitors vary in size and in the scope of the products and services they offer, and include:
in-house analytic and systems developers;
scoring model builders;
enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, and customer communication and mobility solution providers;
business intelligence solutions providers;
credit report and credit score providers;
business process management and decision rules management providers;
process modeling tools providers;
automated application processing services providers;
data vendors;
neural network developers and artificial intelligence system builders;
third-party professional services and consulting organizations;
account/workflow management software providers;
software tools companies supplying modeling, rules, or analytic development tools; collections and recovery solutions providers; entity resolution and social network analysis solutions providers; and
cloud-based customer engagement and risk management solutions providers.
We expect to experience additional competition from other established and emerging companies, as well as from other technologies. For example, certain of our fraud solutions products compete against other methods of preventing credit card fraud, such as credit cards that contain the cardholder’s photograph; smart cards; cardholder verification and authentication solutions; biometric measures on devices including fingerprint and face matching; and other card authorization techniques and user verification techniques. Many of our anticipated competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing, professional services and other resources than we do, and industry consolidation is creating even larger competitors in many of our markets. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. They may also be able to devote greater resources than we can to develop, promote and sell their products. Many of these companies have extensive customer relationships, including relationships with many of our current and potential customers. Furthermore, new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share. For example, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax have formed an alliance that has developed a credit scoring product competitive with our products. If we are unable to respond as quickly or effectively to changes in customer requirements as our competition, our ability to expandrisks materialize, our business could be damaged.
Legal, Regulatory and sell our products will be negatively affected.Compliance Risks
Our competitors may be able to sell products competitive to ours at lower prices individually or as part of integrated suites of several related products. This ability may cause our customers to purchase products that directly compete with our products from our competitors. Price reductions by our competitors could negatively impact our margins, and could also harm our ability to obtain new long-term contracts and renewals of existing long-term contracts on favorable terms.
Laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad that apply to us or to our customers may expose us to liability, cause us to incur significant expense, affect our ability to compete in certain markets, limit the profitability of or demand for our products, or render our products obsolete. If these laws and regulations require us to change our products and services, it could adversely affect our business and results of operations. New legislation or regulations, or changes to existing laws and regulations, may also negatively impact our business and increase our costs of doing business.
Laws and governmental regulation affect how our business is conducted and, in some cases, subject us to the possibility of government supervision and future lawsuits arising from our products and services. Laws and governmental regulation also influence our current and prospective customers’ activities, as well as their expectations and needs in relation to our products and services. Laws and regulations that may affect our business and our current and prospective customers’ activities include, but are not limited to, those in the following significant regulatory areas:
Use of data by creditors and consumer reporting agencies (e.g., the U.S. Fair Credit Reporting Act);
Laws and regulations that limit the use of credit scoring models (e.g., state “mortgage trigger” or “inquiries” laws, state insurance restrictions on the use of credit-based insurance scores, and the E.U. Consumer Credit Directive);
Fair lending laws (e.g., the U.S. Truth In Lending Act and Regulation Z, theEqual Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, and the Fair Housing Act);
Privacy and security laws and regulations that limit the use and disclosure of personally identifiable information, require security procedures, or otherwise apply to the collection, processing, storage, use and transmissiontransfer of protected data (e.g., the U.S. Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm Leach Bliley Act; the E.U.General Data Protection DirectiveRegulation (the “GDPR”) and country-specific data protection laws enacted to supplement the country-specific regulations that implement that directive;GDPR; the U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act; the Cybersecurity Act of 2015; the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Cybersecurity Framework; the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act; and identity theft, file freezing, security breach notification and similar state privacy laws);
Extension of credit to consumers through the Electronic Fund Transfers Act and Regulation E, as well as non‑governmental VISA and MasterCard electronic payment standards;
RegulationsLaws and guidelinesregulations applicable to secondary market participants (e.g., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) that could have an impact on our products;scoring products and revenues, including 12 CFR Part 1254 (Validation and Approval of Credit Score Models) issued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency in accordance with Section 310 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 115-174), and any regulations, standards or criteria established pursuant to such laws or regulations;
Laws and regulations applicable to our customer communication clients and their use of our products and services (e.g., the Telemarketing Sales Rule, Telephone Consumer Protection Act and regulations promulgated thereunder);
Laws and regulations applicable to our insurance clients and their use of our insurance products and services;
The application or extension of consumer protection laws, including implementing regulations (e.g., the Consumer Financial Protection Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Truth In Lending Act and Regulation Z, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, the Military Lending Act, and the Credit Repair Organizations Act);
Laws and regulations governing the use of the Internet and social media, telemarketing, advertising, endorsements and testimonials;
Anti-bribery and corruption laws and regulations (e.g., the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)Act and the UK Bribery Act 2010);
Financial regulatory standards (e.g., Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements to maintain and verify internal process controls, including controls for material event awareness and notification);
Regulatory requirements for managing third parties (e.g., vendors, contractors, suppliers and distributors);
Anti-money laundering laws and regulations (e.g., the Bank Secrecy Act and the USA PatriotPATRIOT Act);
Financial regulatory reform stemming from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the many regulations mandated by that Act, including regulations issued by, and the supervisory and investigative authority of, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection;Protection Bureau; and
Laws and regulations regarding export controls as they apply to FICO products delivered in non-U.S. countries.countries (e.g., Office of Foreign Asset Control sanctions, and Export Administration Regulations).
In addition, many U.S. and foreign jurisdictions have passed, or are currently contemplating, a variety of consumer protection, privacy, and data security laws and regulations that may relate to our business or affect the demand for our products and services. For example, the GDPR became effective on April 14, 2016,May 25, 2018 and imposes, among other things, strict obligations and restrictions on the ability to collect, analyze and transfer European Union (“E.U.”) personal data, a requirement for prompt notice of data breaches in certain circumstances, and possible substantial fines for any violations (including possible fines for certain violations of up to the greater of 20 million Euros or 4% of total worldwide annual revenue). A decision in July 2020 by the Court of Justice of the European Parliament formally adoptedUnion (i.e., Schrems II), calls into question certain data transfer mechanisms between the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”),E.U. and the U.S. The decision may have an adverse impact on cross-border transfers of personal data, may subject us to additional scrutiny from E.U. regulators or may increase our costs of compliance.
Brazil, India, South Africa, Japan, China, Israel, Canada, and several other countries have introduced and, in some cases, enacted, similar privacy and data security laws. The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, which will supersedewas enacted on June 28, 2018 and became effective on January 1, 2020, gives California residents certain privacy rights in the existing Data Protection Directivecollection and disclosure of 95/46/EC in 2018. The GDPR imposes more stringent operational requirements for entities processingtheir personal information and greater penalties for noncompliance.requires businesses to make certain disclosures and take certain other acts in furtherance of those rights. The costs and other burdens of compliance with privacy and data security laws and regulations could negatively impact the use and adoption of our solutions and reduce overall demand for them. Additionally, concerns regarding data privacy may cause our customers, or their customers and potential customers, to resist providing the data necessary to allow us to deliver our solutions effectively. Even the perception that the privacy of personal information is not satisfactorily protected or does not meet regulatory requirements could inhibit sales of our solutions and any failure to comply with such laws and regulations could lead to significant fines, penalties or other liabilities. Any such decrease in demand or incurred fines, penalties or other liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
In addition to existing laws and regulations, changes in the U.S. or foreign legislative, judicial, regulatory or consumer environments could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. The laws and regulations above, and changes to them or their interpretation by the courts, could affect the demand for or profitability of our products, including scoring and consumer products. New laws and regulations pertaining to our customers could cause them to pursue new strategies, reducing the demand for our products.
If we are subject to infringement claims, it could harm our business.
We expect that products in the industry segments in which we compete, including software products, will increasingly be subject to claims of patent and other intellectual property infringement as the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grow. We may need to defend claims that our products infringe intellectual property rights, and as a result we may:
incur significant defense costs or substantial damages;
be required to cease the use or sale of infringing products;
expend significant resources to develop or license a substitute non-infringing technology;
discontinue the use of some technology; or
be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement, which license may not be available or might require substantial royalties or license fees that would reduce our margins.
Moreover, in recent years, individuals and groups that are non-practicing entities, commonly referred to as “patent trolls,” have purchased patents and other intellectual property assets for the purpose of making claims of infringement in order to extract settlements. From time to time, we may receive threatening letters or notices or may be the subject of claims that our solutions and underlying technology infringe or violate the intellectual property rights of others. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can be time consuming, costly to defend in litigation, divert management's attention and resources, damage our reputation and brand, and cause us to incur significant expenses.
Financial Risks
Our products have long and variable sales cycles. If we do not accurately predict these cycles, we may not forecast our financial results accurately, and our stock price could be adversely affected.
We experience difficulty in forecasting our revenues depend,accurately because the length of our sales cycles makes it difficult for us to predict the quarter in which sales will occur. In addition, our selling approach is complex as we look to sell multiple products and services across our customers’ organizations. This makes forecasting of revenues in any given period more difficult. As a result of our sales approach and lengthening sales cycles, revenues and operating results may vary significantly from period to period. For example, the sales cycle for our products typically ranges from 60 days to 18 months, which may be further extended as a result of COVID-19. Customers are often cautious in making decisions to acquire our products because purchasing our products typically involves a significant commitment of capital and may involve shifts by the customer to a greatnew software and/or hardware platform or changes in the customer’s operational procedures. This may cause customers, particularly those experiencing financial stress, to make purchasing decisions more cautiously. Delays in completing sales can arise while customers complete their internal procedures to approve large capital expenditures and test and accept our applications. Consequently, we face difficulty predicting the quarter in which sales to expected customers will occur and experience fluctuations in our revenues and operating results. If we are unable to accurately forecast our revenues, our stock price could be adversely affected.
We typically have revenue-generating transactions concentrated in the final weeks of a quarter, which may prevent accurate forecasting of our financial results and cause our stock price to decline.
Large portions of our customer agreements are consummated in the weeks immediately preceding quarter end. Before these agreements are consummated, we create and rely on forecasted revenues for planning, modeling and earnings guidance. Forecasts, however, are only estimates and actual results may vary for a particular quarter or longer periods of time. Consequently, significant discrepancies between actual and forecasted results could limit our ability to plan, budget or provide accurate guidance, which could adversely affect our stock price. Any publicly-stated revenue or earnings projections are subject to this risk.
Charges to earnings resulting from acquisitions may adversely affect our operating results.
Under business combination accounting standards, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in acquired companies generally at their acquisition-date fair values and separately from goodwill. Goodwill is measured as the excess amount of consideration transferred, which is also generally measured at fair value, and the net of the amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain.
After we complete an acquisition, the following factors could result in material charges and adversely affect our operating results and may adversely affect our cash flows:
impairment of goodwill or intangible assets, or a reduction in the useful lives of intangible assets acquired;
amortization of intangible assets acquired;
identification of, or changes to, assumed contingent liabilities, both income tax and non-income tax related, after our final determination of the amounts for these contingencies or the conclusion of the measurement period (generally up to one year from the acquisition date), whichever comes first;
costs incurred to combine the operations of companies we acquire, such as transitional employee expenses and employee retention, redeployment or relocation expenses;
charges to our operating results to maintain certain duplicative pre-merger activities for an extended period of time or to maintain these activities for a period of time that is longer than we had anticipated, charges to eliminate certain duplicative pre-merger activities, and charges to restructure our operations or to reduce our cost structure; and
charges to our operating results resulting from expenses incurred to effect the acquisition.
Substantially all of these costs will be accounted for as expenses that will decrease our net income and earnings per share for the periods in which those costs are incurred. Charges to our operating results in any given period could differ substantially from other periods based on the timing and size of our future acquisitions and the extent uponof integration activities. A more detailed discussion of our accounting for business combinations and other items is presented in the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 7).
General Risk Factors
The occurrence of certain negative events may cause fluctuations in our stock price.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations due to a number of factors, including variations in our revenues and operating results. We believe that you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of financial results as an indication of future performance. Because many of our operating expenses are fixed and will not be affected by short-term fluctuations in revenues, short-term fluctuations in revenues may significantly impact operating results. Additional factors that may cause our stock price to fluctuate include the following:
variability in demand from our existing customers;
failure to meet the expectations of market analysts;
changes in recommendations by market analysts;
the lengthy and variable sales cycle of many products, combined with the relatively large size of orders for our products, increases the likelihood of short-term fluctuation in revenues;
consumer or customer dissatisfaction with, or problems caused by, the performance of our products;
the timing of new product announcements and introductions in comparison with our competitors;
the level of our operating expenses;
changes in demand and competitive and other conditions in the banking (including consumer credit) and insurance industries. If our clients’ industries experience uncertainty, it will likely harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
During fiscal 2017, 76% of our revenues were derived from sales of products and services to the banking and insurance industries. Global economic uncertainty experienced in the U.S. and other key international economies in the past produced substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption of global credit and other financial markets, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or government assistance to, several major domestic and international financial institutions. The potential for disruptions presents considerable risks to our businesses and operations. These risks include potential bankruptcies or credit deterioration of financial institutions, many of which are our customers. Such disruption would result in a decline in the revenue we receive from financial and other institutions.
While the rate of account growth in the U.S. bankcard industry has been slow and many of our large institutional customers have consolidated in recent years, we have generated most of our revenue growth from our bankcard-related scoring and account management businesses by selling and cross-selling our products and services to large banks and other credit issuers. As the banking industry continues to experience contraction in the number of participating institutions, we may have fewer opportunities for revenue growth due to reduced or changing demand for our products and services that support customer acquisition programs of our customers. In addition, industry contraction could affect the base of recurring revenues derived from contracts in which we are paid on a per-transaction basis as formerly separate customers combine their operations under one contract. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent future revenue contraction or effectively promote future revenue growth in our businesses.
While we are attempting to expand our sales of consumer credit, banking and insurance productsindustries;
| |
| • | fluctuations in domestic and international economic conditions, such as those which have occurred as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; |
our ability to complete large installations, and to adopt and configure cloud-based deployments, on schedule and within budget;
announcements relating to litigation or regulatory matters;
changes in senior management or key personnel;
acquisition-related expenses and charges; and
timing of orders for and deliveries of software systems.
In addition, the financial markets have at various times experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the stock prices of many technology companies and financial services into international markets,companies, and these fluctuations sometimes have been unrelated to the risks are greateroperating performance of these companies. Broad market fluctuations, as these markets are also experiencing substantial disruptionwell as industry-specific and we are less well-known in them.
Risks Related to External Conditions
Material adverse developments in globalgeneral economic conditions, or the occurrence of certain other world events, could affect demand for our products and services and harm our business.
Purchases of technology products and services and decisioning solutions are subject to adverse economic conditions. When an economy is struggling, companies in many industries delay or reduce technology purchases, and we experience softened demand for our decisioning solutions and other products and services. Global economic uncertainty has produced substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption of global credit and other financial markets in the past. Any economic uncertainty canmay negatively affect the businessesour business and purchasing decisions of companies in the industries we serve. The potential for disruptions presents considerable risksrequire us to our businesses and operations. If global economic conditions experience stress and negative volatility, or if there isrecord an escalation in regional or global conflicts or terrorism, we will likely experience reductions in the number of available customers and in capital expenditures by our remaining customers, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of purchase commitments for our products and increased price competition,impairment charge related to goodwill, which maycould adversely affect our business, results of operations, stock price and liquidity.business.
For example, on June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the E.U., commonly referred to as “Brexit.” As a result of the referendum, on March 29, 2017, the U.K. triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty formally starting negotiations regarding its exit from the E.U. The U.K. has two years to complete these negotiations, and the future relationship between the U.K. and the E.U. remains unknown. Brexit has caused, and may continue to create, volatility in global stock markets and regional and global economic uncertainty, which may cause our customers to closely monitor their costs and reduce their spending budget on our products and services.
Whether or not recent or new legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur additional costs in order to compete in a changed business environment. Given the volatile nature of the global economic environment and the uncertainties underlying efforts to stabilize it, we may not timely anticipate or manage existing, new or additional risks, as well as contingencies or developments, which may include regulatory developments and trends in new products and services. Our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In operations outside the U.S., we are subject to unique risks that may harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
A growing portion of our revenues is derived from international sales. During fiscal 2017, 36% of our revenues were derived from business outside the U.S. As part of our growth strategy, we plan to continue to pursue opportunities outside the U.S., including opportunities in countries with economic systems that are in early stages of development and that may not mature sufficiently to result in growth for our business. Accordingly, our future operating results could be negatively affected by a variety of factors arising out of international commerce, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
general economic and political conditions in countries where we sell our products and services;
difficulty in staffing and efficiently managing our operations in multiple geographic locations and in various countries;
effects of a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including restrictions on access to personal information;
import and export licensing requirements;
longer payment cycles;
reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
currency fluctuations;
changes in tariffs and other trade barriers; and
difficulties and delays in translating products and related documentation into foreign languages.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully address each of these challenges in the near term. Additionally, some of our business will be conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are not currently material to our cash flows, financial position or results of operations. However, an increase in our foreign revenues could subject us to increased foreign currency transaction risks in the future.
In addition to the risk of depending on international sales, we have risks incurred in having research and development personnel located in various international locations. We currently have a substantial portion of our product development staff in international locations, some of which have political and developmental risks. If such risks materialize, our business could be damaged.
Our anti-takeover defenses could make it difficult for another company to acquire control of FICO, thereby limiting the demand for our securities by certain types of purchasers or the price investors are willing to pay for our stock.
Certain provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us difficult, even if such events would be beneficial to the interests of our stockholders. These provisions include giving our board the ability to issue preferred stock and determine the rights and designations of the preferred stock at any time without stockholder approval. The rights of the holders of our common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of our outstanding voting stock. These factors and certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or otherwise delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in our management, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium over the fair market value of our common stock.
If we experience changes in tax laws or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income tax returns, it could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to federal and state income taxes in the U.S. and in certain foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, by our ability to generate taxable income in foreign jurisdictions in order to utilize foreign tax losses, and by the valuation of our deferred tax assets. In addition, we are subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from such examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from such examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2.Properties
Our properties consist primarily of leased office facilities for sales, data processing, research and development, consulting and administrative personnel. Our principal locations include:
approximately 55,000 square feet of office space in San Jose, California in one building under a lease expiring in fiscal 2024; this is used for our corporate headquarters and all of our segments;
approximately 173,000 square feet of office space in Bangalore, India in one building under a lease expiring in fiscal 2022; this is used for our Applications and Decision Management Software segments;
approximately 124,000 square feet of office space in San Rafael, California in one building under a lease expiring in fiscal 2020;2025; this is used for all of our segments;
approximately 96,000 square feet of office and data center in Roseville and Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, in two buildings under leases expiring in fiscal 2018 and 2023, respectively; 16,000 square feet of this space is subleased to a third party; this is used for all of our segments; and
approximately 80,000 square feet of office space in San Diego, California in one building under a lease expiring in fiscal 2020;2027; this is used for our Applications and Decision Management Software segments; and
approximately 45,000 square feet of office space in Roseville, Minnesota in one building under a lease expiring in fiscal 2028; this is used for all of our segments.
In addition, we lease an aggregate of approximately 306,000235,000 square feet of office and data center space in a number of smaller domestic locations and internationally in India, the United Kingdom, China, Singapore, and several other locations. We believe that suitable additional space will be available to accommodate future needs. See Note 1817 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information regarding our obligations under leases.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Not Applicable.On March 13, 2020, we received a letter from the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) informing us that the DOJ had opened a civil investigation into potential exclusionary conduct by the Company. We are cooperating with the DOJ in its investigation.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: FICO. According to records of our transfer agent, at October 27, 2017,30, 2020, we had 366 shareholders278 stockholders of record of our common stock.
The following table shows the high and low sales prices for our stock, as listed on the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter in the last two fiscal years:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | High | | Low |
| Fiscal 2016 |
| |
|
| October 1 — December 31, 2015 | $ | 97.00 |
| | $ | 78.11 |
|
| January 1 — March 31, 2016 | $ | 106.64 |
| | $ | 80.20 |
|
| April 1 — June 30, 2016 | $ | 115.87 |
| | $ | 102.77 |
|
| July 1 — September 30, 2016 | $ | 132.95 |
| | $ | 111.73 |
|
| Fiscal 2017 |
| |
|
| October 1 — December 31, 2016 | $ | 126.00 |
| | $ | 109.77 |
|
| January 1 — March 31, 2017 | $ | 133.14 |
| | $ | 118.95 |
|
| April 1 — June 30, 2017 | $ | 140.64 |
| | $ | 125.71 |
|
| July 1 — September 30, 2017 | $ | 147.02 |
| | $ | 131.52 |
|
Dividends
We paid dividends of $0.02 per share on a quarterly basis during each of fiscal 2015 and 2016, and the first and second quarters of our fiscal 2017. In May 2017, our Board of Directors discontinued cash dividend payments in favor of using our excess cash flow for share repurchases.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
| July 1, 2017 through July 31, 2017 | 145,429 |
| | $ | 141.15 |
| | 140,000 |
| | $ | 89,727,312 |
|
| August 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017 | 110,828 |
| | $ | 139.56 |
| | 110,000 |
| | $ | 74,375,781 |
|
| September 1, 2017 through September 30, 2017 | 270,142 |
| | $ | 139.50 |
| | 270,000 |
| | $ | 36,711,201 |
|
| Total | 526,399 |
| | $ | 139.97 |
| | 520,000 |
| | $ | 36,711,201 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
| July 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020 | 2,298 |
| | $ | 436.71 |
| | — |
| | $ | 250,000,000 |
|
| August 1, 2020 through August 31, 2020 | 27,880 |
| | $ | 426.55 |
| | 24,000 |
| | $ | 239,776,878 |
|
| September 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 | 35,990 |
| | $ | 421.32 |
| | 35,600 |
| | $ | 224,777,076 |
|
| Total | 66,168 |
| | $ | 424.05 |
| | 59,600 |
| | $ | 224,777,076 |
|
| |
| (1) | Includes 6,3996,568 shares delivered in satisfaction of the tax withholding obligations resulting from the vesting of restricted stock units held by employees during the quarter ended September 30, 2017.2020. |
| |
| (2) | In July 2016,2019, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program following the completion of our previous program. This program was open-ended and authorized repurchases of shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million in the open market or in negotiated transactions. In October 2017,July 2020, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program following the completion of the July 20162019 program. The new program is open-ended and authorizes repurchases of shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million in the open market or in negotiated transactions. |
Performance Graph
The following graph shows the total stockholder return of an investment of $100 in cash on September 30, 2012,2015, in (a) the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, (b) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and (c) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Application Software Index, in each case with reinvestment of dividends. We doOur past performance may not believe there are any publicly traded companies that compete with us across the full spectrumbe indicative of our product and service offerings.future performance.
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
We acquired CR Software, LLC. (“CR Software”) in November 2012, Infoglide Software, Inc. (“Infoglide”) in April 2013, InfoCentricity, Inc. (“InfoCentricity”) in April 2014, TONBELLER Aktiengesellschaft in January 2015, and QuadMetrics, Inc. in May 2016.2016, and eZmCom, Inc. in August 2019. Results of operations from the acquisitions are included prospectively from their respective acquisition dates and did not materially impact comparability of the data presented below.
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 (1) | | 2016 | | 2015 (1) | | 2014 (1) | | 2013 (1) | 2020 (1) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 (1) | | 2016 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues | $ | 932,169 |
| | $ | 881,356 |
| | $ | 838,781 |
| | $ | 788,985 |
| | $ | 743,444 |
| $ | 1,294,562 |
| | $ | 1,160,083 |
| | $ | 1,000,146 |
| | $ | 934,983 |
| | $ | 881,356 |
|
| Operating income | 177,200 |
| | 169,592 |
| | 137,505 |
| | 161,868 |
| | 161,593 |
| 295,969 |
| | 253,548 |
| | 175,359 |
| | 182,159 |
| | 169,592 |
|
| Net income | 128,256 |
| | 109,448 |
| | 86,502 |
| | 94,879 |
| | 90,095 |
| 236,411 |
| | 192,124 |
| | 126,482 |
| | 133,414 |
| | 109,448 |
|
| Basic earnings per share | 4.16 |
| | 3.52 |
| | 2.75 |
| | 2.80 |
| | 2.55 |
| 8.13 |
| | 6.63 |
| | 4.26 |
| | 4.32 |
| | 3.52 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share | 3.98 |
| | 3.39 |
| | 2.65 |
| | 2.72 |
| | 2.48 |
| 7.90 |
| | 6.34 |
| | 4.06 |
| | 4.14 |
| | 3.39 |
|
| Dividends declared per share | 0.04 |
| | 0.08 |
| | 0.08 |
| | 0.08 |
| | 0.08 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.04 |
| | 0.08 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Working capital | $ | (15,724 | ) | | $ | 21,561 |
| | $ | 42,727 |
| | $ | (52,877 | ) | | $ | 83,308 |
|
| Total assets | 1,255,620 |
| | 1,220,676 |
| | 1,230,163 |
| | 1,192,298 |
| | 1,161,547 |
|
| Senior notes | 244,000 |
| | 316,000 |
| | 376,000 |
| | 447,000 |
| | 455,000 |
|
| Revolving line of credit | 361,000 |
| | 255,000 |
| | 232,000 |
| | 99,000 |
| | 15,000 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | 426,537 |
| | 446,828 |
| | 436,998 |
| | 454,614 |
| | 530,677 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Working capital | $ | 119,567 |
| | $ | (35,122 | ) | | $ | (77,514 | ) | | $ | 22,842 |
| | $ | 21,561 |
|
| Total assets | 1,606,240 |
| | 1,433,448 |
| | 1,330,467 |
| | 1,348,728 |
| | 1,220,676 |
|
| Senior notes | 750,000 |
| | 485,000 |
| | 513,000 |
| | 244,000 |
| | 316,000 |
|
| Revolving line of credit | 95,000 |
| | 345,000 |
| | 257,000 |
| | 361,000 |
| | 255,000 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | 331,082 |
| | 289,767 |
| | 287,437 |
| | 466,183 |
| | 446,828 |
|
(1) Results of operations for fiscal years 2020 and 2017 2015, 2014 and 2013 includeincluded pre-tax charges of $4.5 million, $18.2 million, $4.3$45.0 million and $3.5$4.5 million, respectively, in restructuring and acquisition-related expenses.impairment charges.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) includes the following: a business overview that provides a high-level summary of our strategies and initiatives, financial results and bookings trends that affect our business; a more detailed analysis of our results of operations; our liquidity and capital resources, which discusses key aspects of our statements of cash flows, changes in our balance sheets and our financial commitments; and a summary of our critical accounting policies and estimates we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results. Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Strategies and Initiatives
During fiscal 2017, our growth initiatives continued to generate significant free cash flow. We utilized our cash to enhance shareholder value through investments in long-term growth initiatives and our share repurchase programs.
While2020, we continued to offer on-premise solutions for many customers who prefer to install and runadvance our software in-house, we continued our expansion into cloud-based solutionscloud-enabled, platform-based strategy in our Applications and Decision Management Software segmentssegments. The application of this strategy has led to providean increase in our cloud bookings over the past several years. Our cloud bookings accounted for 41% of our total bookings in fiscal 2020, compared to 39% during fiscal 2019. We have invested, and intend to continue to invest, in product development to build out and deliver features, functionalities and performance enhancements using a SaaS-based approach on our platform. Our continued product innovation provides growth opportunities with customers that can benefit from the affordabilitypower, flexibility and simplicitymodularity of these solutions. The majority of our software solutions are available through the FICO® Analytic Cloud, and during fiscal 2017, we added Amazon Web Services, Inc. (“AWS”) as our primary cloud infrastructure provider. We have migrated several core applications, including the Decision Management Suite, to AWS and will migrate additional applications over the next three years. Our cloud bookings accounted for 24% and 26% of our total bookings during fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively, directly demonstrating the willingness among our customers to engage our cloud-based solutions.
For our Scores segment, our industry leading business-to-business FICO® Scores expanded further intohave achieved a multi-year expansion in the larger, faster growing U.S. consumerbusiness-to-consumer market. TheWe have launched numerous new FICO® Score Open Access program, which allows Score-based products, and continue to grow our participating clients to provide their customers with a free FICO® Score along with content to help them understand the FICO® Score their lender uses, continued its expansion during the current year. We commenced this program in 2014 and now have more than 250 million consumer accounts with access to their free FICO® Score. Thebusiness-to-consumer partnership agreement we launched in fiscal 2015 with Experian, a leading global information services provider, also continued to accelerate during the current year.provider. This partnership provides consumers the FICO® Score that lenders most commonly use in evaluating credit when determining applicant eligibility for new credit cards, car loans, mortgages or other lines of credit and can be accessed through Experian.com. During fiscal 2017, we announcedThe FICO® Score Open Access program, which allows our participating clients to provide their customers with a free FICO® Score along with content to help them understand the FICO Financial Inclusion Initiative, a global effort to increase® Score their lender uses, has more than 240 million consumer accounts with access to affordable credit for consumers and businesses with limited or no credit history, through the use of alternative data.their free FICO® Scores. We continue to pursue additional partners to distribute FICO® Scores with their product offerings sold directly to consumers. In addition,During fiscal 2020, we are pursuing opportunities to makeannounced the launch of the FICO® Scores available Resilience Index, a new analytic tool designed to third-parties for affinity, white-labeled programscomplement FICO® Score models by identifying those consumers who are most resilient to further penetrateeconomic stress relative to other consumers within the same FICO® Score bands. FICO® Resilience Index would enable industry participants to more precisely assess credit risk and expandextend credit to more consumers throughout the markets where our scores are available.economic cycle by managing the risk that emerges during periods of economic stress.
We also returned significantcontinue to enhance stockholder value by returning cash to shareholdersstockholders through our stock repurchase program. During fiscal 2017,2020, we repurchased approximately 1.50.7 million shares at a total repurchase price of $193.3$235.2 million. As of September 30, 2017,2020, we had $36.7$224.8 million remaining under our then-currentcurrent stock repurchase program.
As a strategic cost initiative in fiscal 2020, we committed to a course of action designed to reduce operating costs in lower value, less strategic areas of our business in order to facilitate incremental investment in higher value, more strategic areas while also reducing our facilities footprint in light of post-pandemic workforce patterns. As a result of this initiative, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we recorded a net charge of $41.9 million consisting of impairment losses of $33.2 million on our operating lease assets, property and equipment related to closing or consolidating office spaces, as well as a restructuring charge of $8.7 million related to our workforce reduction. We expect this course of action to result in an aggregate annual expense savings of approximately $36 million beginning in fiscal 2021.
In addition, during fiscal 2020, we changed our practice of selling term software licenses with separate license and maintenance components to a single software subscription contract with license and maintenance bundled. This transition will be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of our fiscal 2021. This will shift the timing of our revenue recognition on these subscription sales, resulting in less revenue recognized upfront and more revenue recognized over the term of these subscriptions. We expect a decline in revenue recognized from term software licenses in fiscal 2021 as we transition to the new term license subscription model. This change will not negatively impact our cash flows.
Overview of Financial Results
Total revenues for fiscal 20172020 were $932.2 million,$1.29 billion, an increase of 6%12% from $881.4$1.16 billion in fiscal 2019. We continue to drive growth in our Scores segment. Scores revenue increased 25% to $528.5 million in fiscal 2016. Revenue in each of our segments increased, with our Scores segment the primary driver increasing by 10%2020 from $421.2 million in fiscal 2017 compared2019, and Scores operating income increased 26% to $454.3 million in fiscal 2016. Our2020 from $361.4 million in fiscal 2019. For our Applications and Decision Management Software segments, our SaaS business continues to grow as we pursue our cloud-enabled, platform-based strategy. Revenue derived from our cloud-enabled SaaS business, which includes both subscription revenue and associated professional services revenue, increased by 4% and 5% in11% to $300.0 million during fiscal 2017 compared2020, from $270.4 million during fiscal 2019. SaaS subscription revenue increased 11% to $236.0 million during fiscal 2016, respectively. 2020, from $213.1 million during fiscal 2019.
We derive a significant portion of revenues internationally, and 36%32% and 34% of total consolidated revenues were derived from clients outside the U.S. during each of fiscal 20172020 and 2016.2019, respectively. A significant portion of our revenues are derived from the sale of products and services within the banking (including consumer credit) industry, and 74%86% and 72%87% of our revenues were derived from within this industry during fiscal 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. In addition, we derive a significant share of our revenues come from transactional or unit-based software license fees, transactional fees derived under credit scoring, data processing, data management and SaaS subscription services arrangements, and annual software maintenance fees. Arrangements with transactional or unit-based pricing accounted for 70%75% and 69%74% of our revenues during fiscal 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Revenue fluctuations in our business are primarily driven by changes in the transactional volume and license fees.
Operating income for fiscal 20172020 was $177.2$296.0 million, an increase of 4%17% from $169.6$253.5 million in fiscal 2016.2019. Operating margin was 19%23% and 22% for each of fiscal 20172020 and 2016.2019, respectively. Net income increased 17%23% to $128.3$236.4 million in fiscal 20172020 from $109.4$192.1 million in fiscal 2016 and net margin increased2019 primarily due to 14% from 12%. The increases were primarily driven by our adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), effective October 1, 2016, as further describedan increase in Notes 1 and 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.operating income. Diluted earnings per share for fiscal 20172020 was $3.98,$7.90, an increase of 17%25% from $3.39$6.34 in fiscal 2016.2019.
COVID-19 Update
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a global pandemic, which has spread throughout the U.S. and the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to contain the virus, including quarantines, shelter-in-place orders, travel bans and restrictions, and business limitations and shutdowns.
Our focus remains on promoting employee health and safety, serving our customers and ensuring business continuity. Since March 2020, our employees have been instructed to work from home in each country where we operate to support their health and well-being as well as for our customers, partners and communities. We have also substantially reduced employee travel to only essential business needs. We cannot predict when or how we will begin to lift the actions put in place, but as of the date of this filing, we do not believe our work-from-home protocol has had a material adverse impact on our internal controls, financial reporting systems or our operations.
Our operational flexibility and strong balance sheet allowed us to successfully manage through the initial impact of COVID-19 while protecting our cash flow and liquidity. However, certain areas of our business have been adversely impacted as a result of the pandemic’s global economic impact. For example, COVID-19 has been adversely affecting certain purchasing decisions by our customers in our Applications and Decision Management Software segments. For our Scores segment, we have seen a decline in auto and unsecured originations volumes, but an increase in mortgage volume through the 2nd half of fiscal 2020 due to strong refinancing activities boosted by low interest rates. Additionally, we have granted and may continue to grant extended payment terms to a small number of customers as a result of COVID-19. We have not and do not plan to modify our customer agreements in a manner that would materially impact our financial condition or results of operations. Finally, contrary to our original expectations, a decrease in sales-related travel activity has not materially affected our ability to consummate sales.
As a cost management initiative due to COVID-19, we accelerated reviews of our leased office spaces across our real estate portfolio to reshape and optimize our occupancy cost structures over the next several years. As a result, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 we recorded impairment charges of $33.2 million on operating lease assets, property and equipment related to closing or consolidating office spaces to better align with anticipated needs. While we intend to continue to manage our costs by limiting the addition of new employees and third-party contracted services, and substantially reducing employee travel and other discretionary spending, to the extent the business disruption continues for an extended period, additional cost management actions will be considered and may become necessary. Further asset impairment charges, increases in allowance for doubtful accounts, or restructuring charges may be required, depending on the severity and duration of the pandemic.
We have not incurred significant financial disruptions thus far from the COVID-19 outbreak, but due to numerous uncertainties, including the severity and duration of the pandemic, actions that may be taken by governmental authorities, the impact on the business of our clients, and other factors, we are unable to accurately predict the impact COVID-19 will have on our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows. For more information, see Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Bookings
Management regards the volume of bookings achieved as an important indicator of future revenues, but they are not comparable to nor a substitute for an analysis of our revenues. Bookings represent contracts signed in the current reporting period that generate current and future revenue streams. While we disclose estimated revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to unsatisfied performance obligations in Note 16 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we believe bookings amount is still a meaningful measure of our business as it includes estimated revenues omitted from Note 16, such as usage-based royalties derived from our software licenses, among others.
We estimate bookings as of the end of the period in which a contract is signed and initial booking estimates are not updated in future periods for changes between estimated and actual results. Our calculations have varying degrees of certainty depending on the revenue type and individual contract terms. They are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties concerning timing and contingencies affecting product delivery and performance, and estimates consider contract terms, knowledge of the marketplace and experience with our customers, among other factors. Actual revenue and the timing thereof could differ materially from our initial estimates.
Although many of our contracts contain non-cancelable terms, most of our bookings are transactional or service relatedservice-related that depend upon estimates such as volume of transactions, number of active accounts, or number of hours incurred. Since these estimates cannot be considered fixed or firm, we do not believe it is appropriate to characterize bookings as backlog. The following paragraphs discuss the key assumptions used to calculate bookings and the susceptibility of these assumptions to variability for each revenue type.type, as defined in Revenue Recognition in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Transactional and Maintenance Bookings
We calculate transactional bookings as the total estimated volume of transactions or number of accounts under contract, multiplied by the contractual rate. Transactional contracts generally span multiple years and require estimates of future transaction volumes or number of active accounts. We develop estimates from discussions with our customers and examinations of historical data from similar products and customer arrangements. Differences between estimated bookings and actual results occur due to variability in the volume of transactions or number of active accounts estimated. This variability is primarily caused by the economic trends in our customers’ industries; individual performance of our customers relative to their competitors; and regulatory and other factors that affect the business environment in which our customers operate.
We calculate maintenance bookings directly from the terms stated in the contract.
Professional Services Bookings
We calculate professional services bookings as the estimated number of hours to complete a project multiplied by the rate per hour. We estimate the number of hours based on our understanding of the project scope, conversations with customer personnel and our experience in estimating professional services projects. Estimated bookings may differ from actual results primarily due to differences in the actual number of hours incurred.
License Bookings
Licenses that are sold on a perpetual or term basis andwhen bookings generally equal the fixed amount (including guaranteed minimums) stated in the contract.
Bookings Trend Analysis
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Bookings | | Bookings Yield (1) | | Number of Bookings over $1 Million | | Weighted- Average Term (2) |
| | (In millions) | | | | | | (months) |
| Quarter ended September 30, 2017 | $ | 145.9 |
| | 16 | % | | 19 |
| | 29 |
|
| Quarter ended September 30, 2016 | $ | 80.3 |
| | 20 | % | | 13 |
| | 37 |
|
| Year ended September 30, 2017 | $ | 429.0 |
| | 36 | % | | 59 |
| | NM(a) |
|
| Year ended September 30, 2016 | $ | 378.0 |
| | 40 | % | | 57 |
| | NM(a) |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Bookings | | Bookings Yield (1) | | Number of Bookings over $1 Million | | Weighted- Average Term (2) |
| | (In millions) | | | | | | (months) |
| Quarter ended September 30, 2020 | $ | 234.6 |
| | 15 | % | | 31 |
| | 55 |
|
| Quarter ended September 30, 2019 | $ | 160.4 |
| | 15 | % | | 34 |
| | 34 |
|
| Year ended September 30, 2020 | $ | 537.0 |
| | 29 | % | | 87 |
| | NM(a) |
|
| Year ended September 30, 2019 | $ | 481.7 |
| | 31 | % | | 95 |
| | NM(a) |
|
| |
| (1) | Bookings yield represents the percentage of revenue recognized from bookings for the periods indicated. |
| |
| (2) | Weighted-average term of bookings measures the average term over which bookings are expected to be recognized as revenue. |
| |
| (a) | NM - Measure is not meaningful as our estimate of bookings is as of the end of the period in which a contract is signed, and we do not update our initial booking estimates in future periods for changes between estimated and actual results. |
Transactional and maintenance bookings were 41%48% of total bookings for each of the years ended September 30, 2020 and 35%2019. Professional services bookings were 33% and 39% of total bookings for the years ended September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Professional servicesLicense bookings were 43%19% and 45%13% of total bookings for the years ended September 30, 20172020 and 2016, respectively. License bookings were 16% and 20% of total bookings for the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2019, respectively.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We are organized into the following three reportable segments: Applications, Scores and Decision Management Software. Although we sell solutions and services into a large number of end user product and industry markets, our reportable business segments reflect the primary method in which management organizes and evaluates internal financial information to make operating decisions and assess performance. Segment revenues, operating income, and related financial information, including disaggregation of revenue, for the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 are set forth in Note 1715 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Revenues
The following tables set forth certain summary information on a segment basis related to our revenues for fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | Revenues Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change | Revenues Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
| Segment | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | |
| Applications | $ | 553,167 |
| | $ | 532,642 |
| | $ | 526,274 |
| | $ | 20,525 |
| | $ | 6,368 |
| | 4 | % | | 1 | % | $ | 602,046 |
| | $ | 605,034 |
| | $ | 564,375 |
| | $ | (2,988 | ) | | $ | 40,659 |
| | — | % | | 7 | % |
| Scores | 266,354 |
| | 241,059 |
| | 207,007 |
| | 25,295 |
| | 34,052 |
| | 10 | % | | 16 | % | 528,547 |
| | 421,177 |
| | 335,870 |
| | 107,370 |
| | 85,307 |
| | 25 | % | | 25 | % |
| Decision Management Software | 112,648 |
| | 107,655 |
| | 105,500 |
| | 4,993 |
| | 2,155 |
| | 5 | % | | 2 | % | 163,969 |
| | 133,872 |
| | 99,901 |
| | 30,097 |
| | 33,971 |
| | 22 | % | | 34 | % |
| Total | $ | 932,169 |
| | $ | 881,356 |
| | $ | 838,781 |
| | 50,813 |
| | 42,575 |
| | 6 | % | | 5 | % | $ | 1,294,562 |
| | $ | 1,160,083 |
| | $ | 1,000,146 |
| | 134,479 |
| | 159,937 |
| | 12 | % | | 16 | % |
| | | | Percentage of Revenues Year Ended September 30, | Percentage of Revenues Year Ended September 30, |
| Segment | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Applications | 59 | % | | 61 | % | | 63 | % | 46 | % | | 52 | % | | 56 | % |
| Scores | 29 | % | | 27 | % | | 25 | % | 41 | % | | 36 | % | | 34 | % |
| Decision Management Software | 12 | % | | 12 | % | | 12 | % | 13 | % | | 12 | % | | 10 | % |
| Total | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Applications
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 348,861 |
| | $ | 328,472 |
| | $ | 320,596 |
| | $ | 20,389 |
| | $ | 7,876 |
| | 6 | % | | 2 | % | $ | 393,994 |
| | $ | 395,398 |
| | $ | 372,283 |
| | $ | (1,404 | ) | | $ | 23,115 |
| | — | % | | 6 | % |
| Professional services | 141,857 |
| | 138,775 |
| | 124,562 |
| | 3,082 |
| | 14,213 |
| | 2 | % | | 11 | % | 136,677 |
| | 137,258 |
| | 142,736 |
| | (581 | ) | | (5,478 | ) | | — | % | | (4 | )% |
| License | 62,449 |
| | 65,395 |
| | 81,116 |
| | (2,946 | ) | | (15,721 | ) | | (5 | )% | | (19 | )% | 71,375 |
| | 72,378 |
| | 49,356 |
| | (1,003 | ) | | 23,022 |
| | (1 | )% | | 47 | % |
| Total | $ | 553,167 |
| | $ | 532,642 |
| | $ | 526,274 |
| | 20,525 |
| | 6,368 |
| | 4 | % | | 1 | % | $ | 602,046 |
| | $ | 605,034 |
| | $ | 564,375 |
| | (2,988 | ) | | 40,659 |
| | — | % | | 7 | % |
Applications segment revenues increased $20.5decreased $3.0 million in fiscal 20172020 from 20162019 primarily dueattributable to a $10.9$17.9 million increasedecrease in our originations fraud solutions and a $10.5$3.1 million decrease in our customer communications services, partially offset by a $10.8 million increase in our compliance solutions and a $7.7 million increase in our originations solutions. The decrease in fraud solutions was primarily attributable to a decrease in license revenue, driven by a large multi-year license renewal recognized during fiscal 2019. The decrease in customer communication services. services was primarily attributable to a decrease in transactional revenue. The increase in originations compliance solutions was primarily attributable to an increase in professional services and transactional revenues from our SaaS products.license revenues. The increase in originations solutions was primarily due to an increase in SaaS subscription revenue classified as transactional and maintenance revenue and an increase in license revenue.
Applications segment revenues increased $40.7 million in fiscal 2019 from 2018 primarily due to a $50.6 million increase in our fraud solutions and a $7.3 million increase in our customer communication services, partially offset by an $8.7 million decrease in our customer management solutions and a $7.6 million decrease in our originations solutions. The increase in fraud solutions was primarily attributable to an increase in license and transactional revenues. The increase in customer communication services was primarily attributable to an increase in transactional revenue as a result of our continued growth in the mobile communication market.
Applications segment revenues increased $6.4 million in fiscal 2016 from 2015 primarily due to an $11.3 million increase in our originations solutions, a $10.9 million increase in our customer communication services, and a $5.1 million increase in our compliance solutions, partially offset by a $19.2 million decrease in our fraud solutions. The increase in originations solutions was primarily attributable to an increase in services revenue. The increase in customer communication services was primarily attributable to an increase in transactional revenues as a result of our growth in the mobile communication market. The increase in compliance solutions was primarily attributable to our acquisition of TONBELLER in January 2015. The decrease in fraudcustomer management solutions was primarily attributable to a decrease in software revenues mainly driven by decreased number of large multi-year license deals occurring during our fiscal 2016.and professional services revenues. The decrease in originations solutions was primarily attributable to a decrease in professional services revenues.
Scores
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 259,780 |
| | $ | 233,655 |
| | $ | 200,426 |
| | $ | 26,125 |
| | $ | 33,229 |
| | 11 | % | | 17 | % | $ | 517,024 |
| | $ | 415,288 |
| | $ | 331,662 |
| | $ | 101,736 |
| | $ | 83,626 |
| | 24 | % | | 25 | % |
| Professional services | 2,849 |
| | 4,185 |
| | 2,901 |
| | (1,336 | ) | | 1,284 |
| | (32 | )% | | 44 | % | 1,600 |
| | 2,157 |
| | 1,900 |
| | (557 | ) | | 257 |
| | (26 | )% | | 14 | % |
| License | 3,725 |
| | 3,219 |
| | 3,680 |
| | 506 |
| | (461 | ) | | 16 | % | | (13 | )% | 9,923 |
| | 3,732 |
| | 2,308 |
| | 6,191 |
| | 1,424 |
| | 166 | % | | 62 | % |
| Total | $ | 266,354 |
| | $ | 241,059 |
| | $ | 207,007 |
| | 25,295 |
| | 34,052 |
| | 10 | % | | 16 | % | $ | 528,547 |
| | $ | 421,177 |
| | $ | 335,870 |
| | 107,370 |
| | 85,307 |
| | 25 | % | | 25 | % |
Scores segment revenues increased $25.3$107.4 million in fiscal 20172020 from 20162019 due to a $14.2an increase of $79.8 million increase in our business-to-business scores revenuesrevenue and an $11.1$27.6 million increase in our business-to-consumer services revenue. The increase in business-to-business scores was primarily attributable to an increase in mortgage volumes, a higher unit price in auto and unsecured originations, a large royalty true-up as well as a large annual license deal recognized during fiscal 2020. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in unsecured originations volume. The increase in business-to-consumer services was attributable to an increase in both royalties derived from direct sales generated from the myFICO.com website and scores sold indirectly to consumers through credit reporting agencies.
Scores segment revenues increased $85.3 million in fiscal 2019 from 2018 due to an increase of $77.4 million in our transactionalbusiness-to-business scores driven by new originations, prescreenrevenue and account management.$7.9 million in our business-to-consumer services revenue. The increase in business-to-business scores was primarily attributable to a higher unit price in mortgage and auto activities. The increase in business-to-consumer services was primarily attributable to an increase in royalties derived from scores sold indirectly to consumers through credit reporting agencies.
Scores segment revenues increased $34.1 million in fiscal 2016 from 2015 due to a $17.8 million increase in our business-to-consumer services revenues and a $16.3 million increase in our business-to-business scores revenue. The increase in business-to-consumer services was primarily attributable to revenue generated from the agreement with Experian that launched in December 2014 and made FICO® Scores available to consumers on Experian.com. The increase in business-to-business scores was primarily attributable to an increase in our transactional scores driven by new originations, account management and prescreen.
During fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, revenues generated from our agreements with Experian TransUnion and Equifax, collectively accounted for approximately 20%14%, 19%13% and 16%11%, respectively, of our total revenues, includingand revenues generated from our agreements with Equifax and TransUnion together accounted for 18%, 16% and 14%, respectively, of our total revenues. Revenues from these customers included amounts recorded in our other segments.
Decision Management Software
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 44,019 |
| | $ | 43,792 |
| | $ | 43,210 |
| | $ | 227 |
| | $ | 582 |
| | 1 | % | | 1 | % | $ | 62,915 |
| | $ | 50,262 |
| | $ | 46,658 |
| | $ | 12,653 |
| | $ | 3,604 |
| | 25 | % | | 8 | % |
| Professional services | 34,863 |
| | 26,778 |
| | 24,310 |
| | 8,085 |
| | 2,468 |
| | 30 | % | | 10 | % | 44,763 |
| | 44,680 |
| | 32,274 |
| | 83 |
| | 12,406 |
| | — | % | | 38 | % |
| License | 33,766 |
| | 37,085 |
| | 37,980 |
| | (3,319 | ) | | (895 | ) | | (9 | )% | | (2 | )% | 56,291 |
| | 38,930 |
| | 20,969 |
| | 17,361 |
| | 17,961 |
| | 45 | % | | 86 | % |
| Total | $ | 112,648 |
| | $ | 107,655 |
| | $ | 105,500 |
| | 4,993 |
| | 2,155 |
| | 5 | % | | 2 | % | $ | 163,969 |
| | $ | 133,872 |
| | $ | 99,901 |
| | 30,097 |
| | 33,971 |
| | 22 | % | | 34 | % |
Decision Management Softwaresegment revenues increased $5.0$30.1 million in fiscal 20172020 from 20162019 primarily attributable to an increase in services revenue related to our FICO® Decision Optimizer, partially offset by a decrease in license revenue, related toas well as an increase in our FICO® Blaze Advisor®.SaaS subscription revenue classified as transactional and maintenance revenue.
Decision Management Softwaresegment revenues increased $2.2$34.0 million in fiscal 20162019 from 20152018 primarily attributable to an increase in license revenue, an increase in professional services revenue, largely due toas well as an increase in our FICO® Decision Management Platform product partially offset by a decrease in our FICO® Blaze Advisor product.SaaS subscription revenue classified as transactional and maintenance revenue.
Operating Expenses and Other Income, (Expense), Net
The following tables set forth certain summary information related to our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 |
| | (In thousands, except employees) | | (In thousands, except employees) | | | (In thousands, except employees) | | (In thousands, except employees) | | |
| Revenues | $ | 932,169 |
| | $ | 881,356 |
| | $ | 838,781 |
| | $ | 50,813 |
| | $ | 42,575 |
| | 6 | % | | 5 | % | $ | 1,294,562 |
| | $ | 1,160,083 |
| | $ | 1,000,146 |
| | $ | 134,479 |
| | $ | 159,937 |
| | 12 | % | | 16 | % |
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenues | 287,123 |
| | 265,173 |
| | 270,535 |
| | 21,950 |
| | (5,362 | ) | | 8 | % | | (2 | )% | 361,142 |
| | 336,845 |
| | 312,898 |
| | 24,297 |
| | 23,947 |
| | 7 | % | | 8 | % |
| Research and development | 110,870 |
| | 103,669 |
| | 98,824 |
| | 7,201 |
| | 4,845 |
| | 7 | % | | 5 | % | 166,499 |
| | 149,478 |
| | 128,383 |
| | 17,021 |
| | 21,095 |
| | 11 | % | | 16 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative | 339,796 |
| | 328,940 |
| | 300,002 |
| | 10,856 |
| | 28,938 |
| | 3 | % | | 10 | % | 420,930 |
| | 414,086 |
| | 376,912 |
| | 6,844 |
| | 37,174 |
| | 2 | % | | 10 | % |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 12,709 |
| | 13,982 |
| | 13,673 |
| | (1,273 | ) | | 309 |
| | (9 | )% | | 2 | % | 4,993 |
| | 6,126 |
| | 6,594 |
| | (1,133 | ) | | (468 | ) | | (18 | )% | | (7 | )% |
| Restructuring and acquisition-related | 4,471 |
| | — |
| | 18,242 |
| | 4,471 |
| | (18,242 | ) | | 100 | % | | (100 | )% | |
| Restructuring and impairment charges | | 45,029 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45,029 |
| | — |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| Total operating expenses | 754,969 |
| | 711,764 |
| | 701,276 |
| | 43,205 |
| | 10,488 |
| | 6 | % | | 1 | % | 998,593 |
| | 906,535 |
| | 824,787 |
| | 92,058 |
| | 81,748 |
| | 10 | % | | 10 | % |
| Operating income | 177,200 |
| | 169,592 |
| | 137,505 |
| | 7,608 |
| | 32,087 |
| | 4 | % | | 23 | % | 295,969 |
| | 253,548 |
| | 175,359 |
| | 42,421 |
| | 78,189 |
| | 17 | % | | 45 | % |
| Interest expense, net | (25,790 | ) | | (26,633 | ) | | (29,150 | ) | | 843 |
| | 2,517 |
| | (3 | )% | | (9 | )% | (42,177 | ) | | (39,752 | ) | | (31,311 | ) | | (2,425 | ) | | (8,441 | ) | | 6 | % | | 27 | % |
| Other income (expense), net | (86 | ) | | 1,610 |
| | 883 |
| | (1,696 | ) | | 727 |
| | (105 | )% | | 82 | % | |
| Other income, net | | 3,208 |
| | 2,276 |
| | 12,884 |
| | 932 |
| | (10,608 | ) | | 41 | % | | (82 | )% |
| Income before income taxes | 151,324 |
| | 144,569 |
| | 109,238 |
| | 6,755 |
| | 35,331 |
| | 5 | % | | 32 | % | 257,000 |
| | 216,072 |
| | 156,932 |
| | 40,928 |
| | 59,140 |
| | 19 | % | | 38 | % |
| Provision for income taxes | 23,068 |
| | 35,121 |
| | 22,736 |
| | (12,053 | ) | | 12,385 |
| | (34 | )% | | 54 | % | 20,589 |
| | 23,948 |
| | 30,450 |
| | (3,359 | ) | | (6,502 | ) | | (14 | )% | | (21 | )% |
| Net income | $ | 128,256 |
| | $ | 109,448 |
| | $ | 86,502 |
| | 18,808 |
| | 22,946 |
| | 17 | % | | 27 | % | $ | 236,411 |
| | $ | 192,124 |
| | $ | 126,482 |
| | 44,287 |
| | 65,642 |
| | 23 | % | | 52 | % |
| Number of employees at fiscal year-end | 3,299 |
| | 3,088 |
| | 2,803 |
| | 211 |
| | 285 |
| | 7 | % | | 10 | % | 4,003 |
| | 4,009 |
| | 3,668 |
| | (6 | ) | | 341 |
| | — | % | | 9 | % |
| | | | Percentage of Revenues Year Ended September 30, | Percentage of Revenues Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Revenues | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenues | 31 | % | | 30 | % | | 32 | % | 28 | % | | 29 | % | | 31 | % |
| Research and development | 12 | % | | 12 | % | | 12 | % | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | 13 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative | 36 | % | | 37 | % | | 36 | % | 33 | % | | 35 | % | | 37 | % |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 1 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % | — | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| Restructuring and acquisition-related | 1 | % | | — | % | | 2 | % | |
| Restructuring and impairment charges | | 3 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Total operating expenses | 81 | % | | 81 | % | | 84 | % | 77 | % | | 78 | % | | 82 | % |
| Operating income | 19 | % | | 19 | % | | 16 | % | 23 | % | | 22 | % | | 18 | % |
| Interest expense, net | (3 | )% | | (3 | )% | | (3 | )% | (3 | )% | | (3 | )% | | (3 | )% |
| Other income, net | | — | % | | — | % | | 1 | % |
| Income before income taxes | 16 | % | | 16 | % | | 13 | % | 20 | % | | 19 | % | | 16 | % |
| Provision for income taxes | 2 | % | | 4 | % | | 3 | % | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 3 | % |
| Net income | 14 | % | | 12 | % | | 10 | % | 18 | % | | 17 | % | | 13 | % |
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists primarily of employee salaries and benefits for personnel directly involved in developing, installingdelivering software products, operating SaaS infrastructure, and supporting revenue products; travel costs;providing support, implementation and consulting services; allocated overhead, costs; outside services; internal network hostingfacilities and data center costs; software royalty fees; and credit bureau data and processing services; third-party hosting fees related to our SaaS services; travel costs; and outside services.
CostThe fiscal 2020 over 2019 increase of revenues as a percentage$24.3 million in cost of revenues increased to 31% during fiscal year 2017 from 30% during fiscal 2016. The $22.0 million increase was primarily attributable to an $11.1 million increase in allocated facilities and infrastructure costs, a $14.6$10.3 million increase in personnel and labor costs and a $7.4$7.6 million increase in allocateddirect materials cost, partially offset by a $4.9 million decrease in travel costs. The increase in facilities and infrastructure costs was primarily attributable to increased resource requirements due to expansion in our cloud infrastructure operations. The increase in personnel and labor costs was primarily attributable to an increase in our average headcount. The increase in direct materials cost was primarily attributable to an increase in license and Scores revenues that incur third-party royalties and data costs, as well as an increase in telecommunication cost. The decrease in travel costs was primarily attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues was 28% during fiscal 2020, materially consistent with that incurred during fiscal 2019.
The fiscal 2019 over 2018 increase of $23.9 million in cost of revenues expenses was primarily attributable to a $13.9 million increase in personnel and labor costs and a $6.7 million increase in facilities and infrastructure costs. The increase in personnel and labor costs was primarily attributable to an increase in professional services delivery cost driven by higher services revenue and an increase in salaries and benefit costs as a result of our increased headcount. The increase in allocated facilities and infrastructure costs was primarily attributable to increased resource requirements due to expansion in our expanded investment in product delivery, support andcloud infrastructure operations.
Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues decreased to 30%29% during fiscal year 20162019 from 32%31% during fiscal 2015. The $5.4 million decrease was2018 primarily attributabledue to a $12.9 million decrease in outside services, partially offset by a $4.6 million increase in personnelincreased sales of our high-margin Scores and labor costs and a $2.4 million increase in direct materials cost. The decrease in outside services was primarily attributable to a decrease in our billable consulting projects utilizing temporary resources. The increase in personnel and labor costs was primarily attributable to an increase in incentive cost and share based compensation cost, partially offset by a decrease in professional services delivery cost. The increase in direct materials was primarily attributable to an increase in telecommunications cost associated with the increase in our customer communications services subscription based revenue.
In fiscal 2018, we expect cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues will be consistent with those incurred during fiscal 2017.software products.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include the personnel and related overhead costs incurred in the development of new products and services, including the research of mathematical and statistical models and the development of new versions of ourApplications and Decision Management Software products.
The fiscal year 20172020 over 20162019 increase of $7.2$17.0 million in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in personnel and labor costs and an increase in allocated facilities and infrastructure costs, both driven by increased average headcount and our continued investments in new product development. Research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues was 13% during fiscal 2020, consistent with that incurred during fiscal 2019.
The fiscal 2019 over 2018 increase of $21.1 million in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to a $5.0$15.6 million increase in personnel and labor costs as a result of increased headcount, and a $2.6$3.5 million increase in facilities and infrastructure costs, mainly driven by our continued investment in the areas of cloud computing and SaaS, as well as new products primarily in the Decision Management Software segment.cost. Research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues were 12%was 13% during fiscal 2017,2019, consistent with thosethat incurred during fiscal 2016.2018.
The fiscal year 2016 over 2015 increase of $4.8 million in research development expenses was primarily attributable to a $6.7 million increase in personnel and labor costs, partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in outside services. The increase in personnel and labor costs was primarily driven by an increase in incentive cost and our continued investment in the areas of cloud computing and software-as-a-service (“SaaS”), as well as several new products primarily in the Decision Management Software segment. The decrease in outside services was primarily attributable to fewer internal projects utilizing temporary resources. Research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues were 12% during fiscal 2016, consistent with those incurred during fiscal 2015.
In fiscal 2018, we expect that research and development expenditures as a percentage of revenues will be consistent with or slightly higher than those incurred during fiscal 2017.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist principally of employee salaries, commissions and benefits; travel costs; overhead costs; advertising and other promotional expenses; corporate facilities expenses; legal expenses; business development expensesexpenses; and the cost of operating computer systems.
The $10.9fiscal 2020 over 2019 increase of $6.8 million increase was primarily attributable to a $21.0 million increase in labor and personnel costs, partially offset by a $4.0 million decrease in marketing expenses and a $6.6 million decrease in outside services. The increase in personnel and costs was primarily attributable to an increase in salariespersonnel and benefitslabor costs as a result of our increased average headcount, an increase inhigher share-based compensation and higher non-capitalizable commission cost driven by revenue growth, and an increase in stock-based compensation cost. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in marketing expenses was primarily attributable toand travel costs as a company-wide marketing event during our fiscal 2016. Theresult of a decrease in outside services was primarily attributabletravel activity due to a one-time settlement during fiscal 2017.COVID-19. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 36%decreased to 33% during fiscal 2017, materially consistent with those incurred2020 from 35% during fiscal 2016.2019 primarily due to increased sales of our high-margin Scores and software products.
The fiscal 2019 over 2018 increase of $37.2 million was primarily attributable to an increase in personnel and labor costs as a result of increased headcount, higher share-based compensation and higher non-capitalizable commission cost. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increaseddecreased to 35% during fiscal 2019 from 37% during fiscal 2016 from 36% during fiscal 2015. The $28.9 million increase was2018 primarily attributabledue to a $23.5 million increase in labor and personnel costs and a $1.6 million increase in marketing expenses. The increase in personnel and costs was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits as a resultincreased sales of our increased headcount, an increase in incentive cost,high-margin Scores and an increase in stock-based compensation cost primarily related to the reduction in our estimated forfeiture rate as well as higher stock price. The increase in marketing expenses was primarily attributable to our investment in expanding and refining our distribution capabilities.
In fiscal 2018, we expect that selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues will be consistent with those incurred during fiscal 2017.software products.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists of expense related to intangible assets recorded in connection with our acquisitions. Our finite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of completed technology and customer contracts and relationships, which are being amortized using the straight-line method over periods ranging from fivefour to fifteen years.
The
Amortization expense was $5.0 million, $6.1 million and $6.6 million for fiscal 2017 over 2016 decrease in amortization expense of $1.3 million was primarily attributable to certain assets associated with our Adeptra, HNC2020, 2019 and Entiera acquisitions becoming fully amortized in fiscal 2017 and 2016.
The fiscal 2016 over 2015 increase in amortization expense of $0.3 million was primarily attributable to the addition of intangible assets associated with our TONBELLER acquisition in January 2015, partially offset by certain assets associated with our Entiera acquisition becoming fully amortized in May 2016.
In fiscal 2018, we expect amortization expense will be significantly lower than that incurred in 2017 due to certain assets associated with our Adeptra and HNC acquisitions becoming fully amortized in fiscal 2017.respectively.
Restructuring and Acquisition-RelatedImpairment Charges
During fiscal 2017,2020, we incurred net charges totaling $4.5$45.0 million consisting of $1.7$28.0 million in facilities chargesimpairment loss on operating lease assets, $5.2 million in impairment loss on abandonment of property and equipment and $11.8 million in restructuring charges. The impairment losses were associated with vacating excess leasedclosing certain non-core offices and reducing office space in San Rafael, California and $2.8 millionother locations to better align with anticipated needs in severancelight of post-pandemic workforce patterns. The restructuring charges duerelated to the eliminationemployee separation costs as a result of 79eliminating 209 positions throughout the Company. Cash payments for all the facilities charges will be paid by the end of fiscal 2020. Cash payments for all the employee separation costs will be paid by the end of the second quarter ofour fiscal 2018. There were no acquisition-related expenses incurred during fiscal 2017.2021.
There were no restructuring or acquisition-related expensesand impairment charges incurred during fiscal 2016.
During fiscal 2015, we incurred net charges totaling $17.5 million consisting of $13.6 million in facilities charges associated with vacating excess leased space in Roseville, Minnesota2019 and San Rafael, California, and $3.9 million in severance charges due to the elimination of 97 positions throughout the Company. Cash payments for all the facilities charges will be paid by the end of fiscal 2020. Cash payments for all the severance costs were paid by the end of fiscal 2016. We also incurred $0.7 million in acquisition-related cost primarily associated with our TONBELLER acquisition.
The following table sets forth certain summary information on restructuring expenses for the fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Severance costs | $ | 2,742 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,908 |
|
| Lease exit costs and other adjustments | 1,729 |
| | — |
| | 13,571 |
|
| Total restructuring expense | $ | 4,471 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17,479 |
|
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense includes primarily interest on the senior notes issued in December 2019, May 20082018, and July 2010, as well as interest and credit facility fees on the revolving line of credit. On our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, interest expense is netted with interest income, which is derived primarily from the investment of funds in excess of our immediate operating requirements.
The fiscal 20172020 over 2016 decrease2019 increase in net interest expense of $0.8$2.4 million was primarily attributable to the $72.0 million and $60.0 million principal payments in July 2017 and July 2016, respectively, on the senior notes issued in July 2010, resulting in lower average debt balances for fiscal 2017, partially offset by a higher average outstanding debt balance during fiscal 2020.
The fiscal 2019 over 2018 increase in net interest expense of $8.4 million was primarily attributable to a higher average outstanding debt balance during fiscal 2019, as well as a higher average interest rate on our 2018 Senior Notes compared to that on our revolving line of credit.
The fiscal 2016 over 2015 decrease in net interest expense of $2.5 million was primarily attributable to the $71.0 million principal payment in May 2015 on the senior notes issued in May 2008 and the $60.0 million principal payment in July 2016 on the senior notes issued in July 2010, resulting in lower average debt balances for fiscal 2016 for both senior notes, partially offset by a higher average outstanding balance on our revolving line of credit.
In fiscal 2018, we expect net interest expense will be consistent with what we incurred during fiscal 2017.
Other Income, (Expense), Net
Other income, (expense), net consists primarily of realized investment gains/losses and unrealized gains/losses on certain investments classified as trading securities, exchange rate gains/losses resulting from re-measurement of foreign-currency-denominated receivable and cash balances held by our various reporting entities into their respective functional currencies at period-end market rates, net of the impact of offsetting foreign currency forward contracts, and other non-operating items.
The fiscal 20172020 over 2016 change2019 increase in other income, (expense), net of $1.7$0.9 million was primarily attributable to an increase in foreign currency exchange loss during fiscal 2017.
The fiscal 2016 over 2015 change in other income (expense), net of $0.7 million was primarily attributable tounrealized gains on our supplemental retirement and savings plan, partially offset by an increase in foreign currency exchange losses.
The fiscal 2019 over 2018 decrease in other income, net of $10.6 million was primarily attributable to a non-operating gain related to the divestiture of an investment during fiscal 2016.2018.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rates were 15.2%8.0%, 24.3%11.1% and 20.8%19.4% in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
The decrease in our effectiveincome tax rateprovision in fiscal 20172020 compared to fiscal 20162019 was due primarily to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on October 1, 2016. We no longer record excess tax benefits as an increaserelated to additional paid-in capital, but record such excess tax benefits on a prospective basis as a reduction ofstock-based compensation.
The decrease in our income tax expense.
The increaseprovision in our effectivefiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 was due to the decrease in the overall federal tax rate from the blended 24.5% in fiscal 2016 compared2018 to 2015 was primarily due to a higher percentage of revenue21% in higher taxing jurisdictions during the current year,fiscal 2019 and the favorable settlementrecording of several one-time items in fiscal 2018 related to the enactment of the fiscal 2006-2009 state auditsTax Cuts and the 2010 foreign transfer pricing assessment in fiscal 2015, partially offset by higher foreign tax credits, research credits and domestic production deduction credits in fiscal 2016.
Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”).
As of September 30, 2017,2020, we have not made a provision for U.S. or additional foreign withholding taxes onhad approximately $47.0$111.7 million of the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries. We intend to reinvest theunremitted earnings of non-U.S. subsidiariessubsidiaries. The Company generates substantial cash flow in those operations indefinitely, except where we are ablethe U.S. and does not have a current need for the cash to repatriatebe returned to the U.S. from the foreign entities. In the event these earnings are later remitted to the United States without material incrementalU.S., any estimated withholding tax provision. The determination and estimationon remittance of the futurethose earnings is expected to be immaterial to our income tax consequences in all relevant taxing jurisdictions involves the applicationprovision.
Operating Income
The following tables set forth certain summary information on a segment basis related to our operating income for the fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change | Year Ended September 30, | | Period-to-Period Change | | Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
| Segment | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | | 2017 to 2016 | | 2016 to 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 | | 2020 to 2019 | | 2019 to 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) | | | | |
| Applications | $ | 159,500 |
| | $ | 168,271 |
| | $ | 159,608 |
| | $ | (8,771 | ) | | $ | 8,663 |
| | (5 | )% | | 5 | % | $ | 153,541 |
| | $ | 161,162 |
| | $ | 143,964 |
| | $ | (7,621 | ) | | $ | 17,198 |
| | (5 | )% | | 12 | % |
| Scores | 211,918 |
| | 185,084 |
| | 151,214 |
| | 26,834 |
| | 33,870 |
| | 14 | % | | 22 | % | 454,310 |
| | 361,356 |
| | 272,418 |
| | 92,954 |
| | 88,938 |
| | 26 | % | | 33 | % |
| Decision Management Software | (10,818 | ) | | (3,660 | ) | | (6,350 | ) | | (7,158 | ) | | 2,690 |
| | 196 | % | | (42 | )% | (23,475 | ) | | (35,116 | ) | | (34,360 | ) | | 11,641 |
| | (756 | ) | | (33 | )% | | 2 | % |
| Unallocated corporate expenses | (104,998 | ) | | (110,612 | ) | | (89,744 | ) | | 5,614 |
| | (20,868 | ) | | (5 | )% | | 23 | % | (144,704 | ) | | (144,755 | ) | | (125,255 | ) | | 51 |
| | (19,500 | ) | | — | % | | 16 | % |
| Total segment operating income | 255,602 |
| | 239,083 |
| | 214,728 |
| | 16,519 |
| | 24,355 |
| | 7 | % | | 11 | % | 439,672 |
| | 342,647 |
| | 256,767 |
| | 97,025 |
| | 85,880 |
| | 28 | % | | 33 | % |
| Unallocated share-based compensation | (61,222 | ) | | (55,509 | ) | | (45,308 | ) | | (5,713 | ) | | (10,201 | ) | | 10 | % | | 23 | % | (93,681 | ) | | (82,973 | ) | | (74,814 | ) | | (10,708 | ) | | (8,159 | ) | | 13 | % | | 11 | % |
| Unallocated amortization expense | (12,709 | ) | | (13,982 | ) | | (13,673 | ) | | 1,273 |
| | (309 | ) | | (9 | )% | | 2 | % | (4,993 | ) | | (6,126 | ) | | (6,594 | ) | | 1,133 |
| | 468 |
| | (18 | )% | | (7 | )% |
| Unallocated restructuring and acquisition-related | (4,471 | ) | | — |
| | (18,242 | ) | | (4,471 | ) | | 18,242 |
| | 100 | % | | (100 | )% | |
| Unallocated restructuring and impairment charges | | (45,029 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (45,029 | ) | | — |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| Operating income | $ | 177,200 |
| | $ | 169,592 |
| | $ | 137,505 |
| | 7,608 |
| | 32,087 |
| | 4 | % | | 23 | % | $ | 295,969 |
| | $ | 253,548 |
| | $ | 175,359 |
| | 42,421 |
| | 78,189 |
| | 17 | % | | 45 | % |
Applications
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Percentage of Revenues | Year Ended September 30, | | Percentage of Revenues |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | (In thousands) | | | �� | | | |
| Segment revenues | $ | 553,167 |
| | $ | 532,642 |
| | $ | 526,274 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | $ | 602,046 |
| | $ | 605,034 |
| | $ | 564,375 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Segment operating expenses | (393,667 | ) | | (364,371 | ) | | (366,666 | ) | | (71 | )% | | (68 | )% | | (70 | )% | (448,505 | ) | | (443,872 | ) | | (420,411 | ) | | (74 | )% | | (73 | )% | | (74 | )% |
| Segment operating income | $ | 159,500 |
| | $ | 168,271 |
| | $ | 159,608 |
| | 29 | % | | 32 | % | | 30 | % | $ | 153,541 |
| | $ | 161,162 |
| | $ | 143,964 |
| | 26 | % | | 27 | % | | 26 | % |
Scores
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Percentage of Revenues | Year Ended September 30, | | Percentage of Revenues |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | (In thousands) | | | | | | |
| Segment revenues | $ | 266,354 |
| | $ | 241,059 |
| | $ | 207,007 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | $ | 528,547 |
| | $ | 421,177 |
| | $ | 335,870 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Segment operating expenses | (54,436 | ) | | (55,975 | ) | | (55,793 | ) | | (20 | )% | | (23 | )% | | (27 | )% | (74,237 | ) | | (59,821 | ) | | (63,452 | ) | | (14 | )% | | (14 | )% | | (19 | )% |
| Segment operating income | $ | 211,918 |
| | $ | 185,084 |
| | $ | 151,214 |
| | 80 | % | | 77 | % | | 73 | % | $ | 454,310 |
| | $ | 361,356 |
| | $ | 272,418 |
| | 86 | % | | 86 | % | | 81 | % |
Decision Management Software
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Percentage of Revenues | Year Ended September 30, | | Percentage of Revenues |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | (In thousands) | | | | | | |
| Segment revenues | $ | 112,648 |
| | $ | 107,655 |
| | $ | 105,500 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | $ | 163,969 |
| | $ | 133,872 |
| | $ | 99,901 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Segment operating expenses | (123,466 | ) | | (111,315 | ) | | (111,850 | ) | | (110 | )% | | (103 | )% | | (106 | )% | (187,444 | ) | | (168,988 | ) | | (134,261 | ) | | (114 | )% | | (126 | )% | | (134 | )% |
| Segment operating loss | $ | (10,818 | ) | | $ | (3,660 | ) | | $ | (6,350 | ) | | (10 | )% | | (3 | )% | | (6 | )% | $ | (23,475 | ) | | $ | (35,116 | ) | | $ | (34,360 | ) | | (14 | )% | | (26 | )% | | (34 | )% |
The fiscal 20172020 over 20162019 increase in operating income of $7.6$42.4 million was attributable to a $50.8$134.5 million increase in segment revenues a $5.6 million decrease in unallocated corporate expenses and a $1.3$1.1 million decrease in amortization expense, partially offset by a $39.9$45.0 million increase in restructuring and impairment charges, a $37.5 million increase in segment operating expenses, and a $5.7$10.7 million increase in share-based compensation expense and a $4.5 million increase in restructuring and acquisition-related expenses.expense.
At the segment level, the $16.5$97.0 million increase in segment operating income was the result of a $26.8$93.0 million increase in our Scores segment operating income and an $11.6 million decrease in our Decision Management Software segment operating loss, partially offset by a $7.6 million decrease in our Applications segment operating income.
The $7.6 million decrease in Applications segment operating income was attributable to a $4.6 million increase in segment operating expenses and a $3.0 million decrease in segment revenue. Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenue for Applications was 26%, materially consistent with fiscal 2019.
The $93.0 million increase in Scores segment operating income was attributable to a $107.4 million increase in segment revenue, partially offset by a $14.4 million increase in segment operating expenses. Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenue for Scores was 86%, consistent with fiscal 2019.
The $11.6 million decrease in Decision Management Software segment operating loss was attributable to a $30.1 million increase in segment revenue, partially offset by an $18.5 million increase in segment operating expenses. Segment operating margin for Decision Management Software improved to negative 14% from negative 26%, mainly due to an increase in sales of our higher-margin software products, partially offset by our continued investment in cloud infrastructure operations and new products.
The fiscal 2019 over 2018 increase in operating income of $78.2 million was attributable to a $160.0 million increase in segment revenues and a $0.5 million decrease in amortization expense, partially offset by a $54.6 million increase in segment operating expenses, a $19.5 million increase in unallocated corporate expenses and an $8.2 million increase in share-based compensation expense.
At the segment level, the $85.9 million increase in segment operating income was the result of an $88.9 million increase in our Scores segment operating income and a $5.6$17.2 million decrease in unallocated corporate expenses, partially offset by an $8.8 million decreaseincrease in our Applications segment operating income, partially offset by a $19.5 million increase in unallocated corporate expenses primarily driven by an increase in unallocated incentive cost and a $7.1$0.7 million increase in our Decision Management Software segment operating loss.
The $8.8$17.2 million decreaseincrease in Applications segment operating income was attributable to a $29.3$40.7 million increase in segment revenue, partially offset by a $23.5 million increase in segment operating expenses, partially offset by a $20.5 million increase in segment revenues.expenses. Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenuesrevenue for Applications decreasedincreased to 29%27% from 32% primarily26% mainly due to a decreasean increase in sales of our higher-margin software products and an increase in professional services delivery cost.products.
The $26.8$88.9 million increase in Scores segment operating income was attributable to a $25.3an $85.3 million increase in segment revenues andrevenue as well as a $1.5$3.6 million decrease in segment operating expenses. Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenuesrevenue for Scores increased to 80%86% from 77%81% mainly due to an increase in sales of our higher-margin score products.
The $7.1$0.7 million increase in Decision Management Software segment operating loss was attributable to a $12.1$34.7 million increase in segment operating expenses, partially offset by a $5.0$34.0 million increase in segment revenues.revenue. Segment operating margin for Decision Management Software decreasedimproved to a negative 10%26% from a negative 3% mainly due to a decrease in sales of our higher-margin software products, our continued investment in sales distribution, and expanded investment in cloud infrastructure operations.
The fiscal 2016 over 2015 increase in operating income of $32.1 million was attributable to a $42.7 million increase in segment revenues, an $18.2 million decrease in restructuring and acquisition-related expenses and a $2.6 million decrease in segment operating expenses, partially offset by a $20.9 million increase in unallocated corporate expenses, a $10.2 million increase in share-based compensation expense and a $0.3 million increase in amortization expense. The increase in corporate expenses was primarily driven by a higher incentive cost. The increase in share-based compensation cost was primarily related to the reduction in our estimated forfeiture rate as well as higher stock price.
At the segment level, the $24.4 million increase in segment operating income was the result of an $8.7 million increase in our Applications segment operating income, a $33.9 million increase in our Scores segment operating income and a $2.7 million decrease in our Decision Management Software segment operating loss, partially offset by a $20.9 million increase in unallocated corporate expenses.
The $8.7 million increase in Applications segment operating income was attributable to a $6.4 million increase in segment revenues and a $2.3 million decrease in segment operating expenses. Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenues for Applications increased to 32% from 30% primarily due to improved efficiency in our professional services operations, partially offset by a decrease in sales of our higher-margin software products.
The $33.9 million increase in Scores segment operating income was attributable to a $34.1 million increase in segment revenues, partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in segment operating expenses. Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenues for Scores increased to 77% from 73%34% mainly due to an increase in sales of our higher-margin scoresoftware products, partially offset by our continued investment in cloud infrastructure operations and new products.
The $2.7 million decrease in Decision Management Software segment operating loss was attributable to a $2.2 million increase in segment revenues and a $0.5 million decrease in segment operating expenses. Segment operating margin for Decision Management Software improved to a negative 3% from a negative 6% mainly due to improved efficiency in our professional services operations.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Outlook
As of September 30, 2017,2020, we had $105.6$157.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, which included $92.2$118.0 million held off-shore by our foreign subsidiaries. WeOur cash position could be affected by various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and other risks detailed in Part I, Item 1A titled “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, based on our current business plan and revenue prospects, we believe theseour cash and cash equivalents balances, as well as available borrowings from our $500$400 million revolving line of credit and anticipated cash flows from operating activities, will be sufficient to fund our working and other capital requirements as well as the $131.0 million principal payment due in May 2018 on our senior notes issued in May 2008.requirements. Under our current financing arrangements, we have no other significant debt obligations maturing over the next twelve months. Additionally, even though weOur undistributed earnings outside the U.S. are deemed to be permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. We currently do not anticipate theforesee a need to repatriate any undistributed earnings fromcash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiariessubsidiaries. If these funds are needed for our operations in the foreseeable future,U.S., we may take advantage of opportunities wherebe required to accrue for state income or foreign withholding taxes on the distributed foreign earnings, which we are ableexpect to repatriate these earnings to the United States without material incremental tax provision.be immaterial.
In the normal course of business, we evaluate the merits of acquiring technology or businesses, or establishing strategic relationships with or investing in these businesses. We may elect to use available cash and cash equivalents to fund such activities in the future. In the event additional needs for cash arise, or if we refinance our existing debt, we may raise additional funds from a combination of sources, including the potential issuance of debt or equity securities. Additional financing might not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds were not available or were not available on acceptable terms, our ability to take advantage of unanticipated opportunities or respond to competitive pressures could be limited.
Summary of Cash Flows
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating activities | $ | 225,644 |
| | $ | 210,268 |
| | $ | 146,772 |
| $ | 364,916 |
| | $ | 260,350 |
| | $ | 223,052 |
|
| Investing activities | (20,605 | ) | | (27,615 | ) | | (81,916 | ) | (24,583 | ) | | (42,760 | ) | | (14,119 | ) |
| Financing activities | (180,625 | ) | | (190,015 | ) | | (72,430 | ) | (289,424 | ) | | (200,047 | ) | | (218,627 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 5,278 |
| | (2,832 | ) | | (11,381 | ) | 59 |
| | (1,140 | ) | | (5,901 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 29,692 |
| | $ | (10,194 | ) | | $ | (18,955 | ) | $ | 50,968 |
| | $ | 16,403 |
| | $ | (15,595 | ) |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary method for funding operations and growth has been through cash flows generated from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $225.6$364.9 million in fiscal 20172020 compared to $210.3$260.4 million in fiscal 2016.2019. The $15.3$104.5 million increase was mainly attributable to a $20.0 million decrease in our deferred income tax provision and an $18.8$44.3 million increase in net income, partially offset by a $24.2$46.1 million excess tax benefit related to share-based payments that was recordedincrease in non-cash items, including a $28.0 million increase in impairment loss on operating lease assets as an increase to additional paid-in capital in the prior year but was recordedwell as a reduction$20.0 million increase in operating lease costs, and a $14.2 million increase that resulted from timing of income tax expensereceipts and payments in the current year as a resultour ordinary course of our early adoption of ASU 2016-09 effective October 1, 2016.business.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $210.3$260.4 million in fiscal 20162019 compared to $146.8$223.1 million in fiscal 2015.2018. The $63.5$37.3 million increase was mainly attributable to a $22.9 million$65.6 increase in net income andas well as an $18.7 million increase in non-cash items, partially offset by a $22.9$47.0 million decrease that resulted from timing of receipts and payments in income tax payments.our ordinary course of business.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $20.6$24.6 million in fiscal 20172020 compared to $27.6$42.8 million in fiscal 2016.2019. The $7.0$18.2 million decrease was primarily attributable to a $5.7$15.9 million decrease in net cash used for acquisitions and a $2.1$2.0 million decrease in net cash used for purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $27.6$42.8 million in fiscal 20162019 compared to $81.9$14.1 million in fiscal 2015.2018. The $54.3$28.7 million decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to a $51.3$20.0 million decrease in proceeds from the sale of cost method investment and a $15.9 million increase in net cash used for acquisitions, andpartially offset by a $3.0$7.3 million decrease in net cash used for purchases of property and equipment.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $180.6$289.4 million in fiscal 20172020 compared to $190.0$200.0 million in fiscal 2016.2019. The $9.4 million decrease was primarily due to an $83.0 million increase in proceeds, net of payments from our revolving line of credit, partially offset by a $49.2 million increase in net cash used for repurchases of common stock, a $12.0 million increase in payment on our senior notes, and a $10.3 million increase in taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $190.0 million in fiscal 2016 compared to $72.4 million in fiscal 2015. The $117.6$89.4 million increase was primarily due to a $110.0$338.0 million decreaseincrease in proceeds,payments, net of payments fromproceeds, on our revolving line of credit and a $10.5$49.9 million increase in taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards, partially offset by an $11.0a $293.0 million increase in proceeds, net of payments, from our senior notes.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $200.0 million in fiscal 2019 compared to $218.6 million in fiscal 2018. The $18.6 million decrease was primarily due to a $192.0 million decrease in paymentpayments, net of proceeds, on our revolving line of credit, a $113.7 million decrease in net cash used for repurchases of common stock and an $11.8 million increase in proceeds from issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans, partially offset by a $297.0 million decrease in proceeds, net of payments, from our senior notes.
Repurchases of Common Stock
In July 2016,2019, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program following the completion of the previously authorized program. This program was open-ended and authorized repurchases of shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million in the open market or in negotiated transactions. In July 2020, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program following the completion of the July 2019 program. This program is open-ended and authorizes repurchases of shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million in the open market or in negotiated transactions. As of September 30, 2017,2020, we had $36.7$224.8 million remaining under this authorization. During fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we expended $193.3$235.2 million, $138.4$228.9 million and $130.7$336.9 million, respectively, under thisthese and previously authorized stock repurchase programs.
In October 2017, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program following the completion of the July 2016 program. The new program is open-ended and authorizes repurchases of shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million in the open market or in negotiated transactions.
Dividends
We paid dividends of $0.02 per share on a quarterly basis during each of fiscal 2015 and 2016, and the first two quarters of our fiscal 2017. In May 2017, our Board of Directors discontinued cash dividend payments in favor of using our excess cash flow for share repurchases.
Revolving Line of Credit
In June 2017,On May 8, 2018, we amended our credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, increasing our borrowing capacity underextending the maturity date of the unsecured revolving line of credit from December 30, 2019 to $500May 8, 2023, while reducing our borrowing capacity to $400 million with an option to increase it by another $100 million. The revolving line of credit expires on December 30, 2019. Proceeds from the credit facility can be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and may also be used for the refinancing of existing debt, acquisitions and the repurchase of our common stock. Interest on amounts borrowed under the credit facility is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.500% and (c) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.000%, plus, in each case, an applicable margin, or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate borrowings ranges from 0% to 0.875% and for LIBOR borrowings ranges from 1.000% to 1.875%, and is determined based on our consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, we must pay credit facility fees. The credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants including maintaining a minimum fixed charge ratio of 2.5 and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.0,3.25, subject to a step up to 3.53.75 following certain permitted acquisitions.acquisitions; and a minimum fixed charge ratio of 2.50 through the maturity of our 2010 Senior Notes (as defined below) in July 2020, following which maintaining a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.00 is required. The credit agreement also contains other covenants typical of unsecured facilities. As of September 30, 2017,2020, we had $361.0$95.0 million in borrowings outstanding at a weighted averageweighted-average interest rate of 2.365%1.285% and we were in compliance with all financial covenants under this credit facility.
Senior Notes
In May 2008,On July 14, 2010, we issued $275$245 million of Senior Notessenior notes in a private placement to a group of institutional investors, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of which was paid in full at maturity on July 14, 2020 (the “2008“2010 Senior Notes”). On May 8, 2018, we issued $400 million of senior notes in a private offering to qualified institutional investors (the “2018 Senior Notes”). The 20082018 Senior Notes were issued in four series with maturities ranging from five to ten years. The weighted averagerequire interest payments semi-annually at a rate is 7.2%of 5.25% per annum and the weighted average maturity is 10.0 years for the remaining 2008 Senior Notes. In addition, in July 2010,will mature on May 15, 2026. On December 6, 2019, we issued $245$350 million of Senior Notessenior notes in a private placementoffering to a group ofqualified institutional investors (the “2010“2019 Senior Notes” and,Notes,” along with the 20082010 Senior Notes and 2018 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”). The 20102019 Senior Notes were issued in four series with maturities ranging from six to ten years. require interest payments semi-annually at a rate of 4.00% per annum and will mature on June 15, 2028.
The weighted average interest rate is 5.6%indentures for the 2018 Senior Notes and the weighted average maturity is 9.8 years for the remaining 2010 Senior Notes. The2019 Senior Notes are subject tocontain certain restrictive covenants that are substantially similar to those in the credit agreement for the revolving credit facility, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. The purchase agreements for the Senior Notes also include covenants typical of unsecured facilities.obligations. As of September 30, 2017,2020, the carrying value of the Senior Notes was $244.0$750.0 million and we were in compliance with all financial covenants under these purchase agreements.obligations, and do not believe we are at material risk of not meeting these covenants due to COVID-19.
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations at September 30, 2017:2020:
| | | | Year Ended September 30, |
| Thereafter |
| Total | Year Ending September 30, |
| Thereafter |
| Total |
| | 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
| 2022 |
| 2021 |
| 2022 |
| 2023 |
| 2024 |
| 2025 |
|
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Senior notes (1) | $ | 131,000 |
| | $ | 28,000 |
| | $ | 85,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| $ | 244,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 750,000 |
|
| $ | 750,000 |
|
| Revolving line of credit | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 95,000 |
| | — |
| | 95,000 |
|
| Interest due on debt obligations (2) | 15,675 |
| | 6,269 |
| | 4,752 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 26,696 |
| 35,000 |
| | 35,000 |
| | 35,000 |
| | 35,000 |
| | 35,000 |
| | 63,000 |
|
| 238,000 |
|
| Finance lease obligations | | 2,397 |
| | 2,240 |
| | 784 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,421 |
|
| Operating lease obligations | 23,787 |
| | 22,042 |
| | 13,414 |
| | 9,619 |
| | 9,104 |
| | 22,790 |
|
| 100,756 |
| 26,047 |
| | 21,925 |
| | 17,109 |
| | 14,384 |
| | 9,004 |
| | 17,131 |
|
| 105,600 |
|
| Unrecognized tax benefits (3) | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 6,480 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 7,994 |
|
| Total commitments | $ | 170,462 |
|
| $ | 56,311 |
|
| $ | 103,166 |
|
| $ | 9,619 |
|
| $ | 9,104 |
|
| $ | 22,790 |
|
| $ | 377,932 |
| $ | 63,444 |
|
| $ | 59,165 |
|
| $ | 52,893 |
|
| $ | 49,384 |
|
| $ | 139,004 |
|
| $ | 830,131 |
|
| $ | 1,202,015 |
|
| |
| (1) | Represents the unpaid principal amount of the Senior Notes. |
| |
| (2) | Represents interest payments on the Senior Notes. |
| |
| (3) | Represents unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions. As we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time, the related balances have not been reflected in the section of the table showing payment by fiscal year. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These accounting principles require management to make certain judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We periodically evaluate our estimates including those relating to revenue recognition, goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions, share-based compensation, income taxes and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on the specific circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
Software LicensesContracts with Customers
Software license feeOur revenue is primarily derived from term-based or perpetual licensing of software and scoring products and solutions, and associated maintenance; SaaS subscription services; scoring and credit monitoring services for consumers; and professional services. For contracts with customers that contain various combinations of products and services, we evaluate whether the products or services are distinct—distinct products or services will be accounted for as separate performance obligations, while non-distinct products or services are combined with others to form a single performance obligation. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidencecontrol of an arrangement exists,the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers.
License revenue is derived from contracts in which we grant our direct customers or distributors the right to deploy or resell our software and scoring products and solutions on-premises. Our software offerings often include a perpetual or term-based license and post-contract support or maintenance, both of which generally represent distinct performance obligations and are accounted for separately. The transaction price is either in the form of a fixed consideration with separately stated prices for license and maintenance, a single subscription with license and maintenance bundled, or a usage-based royalty—sometimes subject to a guaranteed minimum—for the license and maintenance bundle. When the amount is in the form of a fixed consideration, including the guaranteed minimum in usage-based royalty, license revenue from distinct on-premises licenses is recognized at the point in time when the software or scoring solution is made available to the customer or distributor. Any royalties not subject to the guaranteed minimum or earned in excess of the minimum amount are recognized as transactional revenue when the subsequent sales or usage occurs. Revenue allocated to maintenance is generally recognized ratably over the contract period as customers simultaneously consume and receive benefits.
In addition to usage-based royalty on our software and scoring products, transactional revenue is also derived from SaaS contracts in which we provide customers with access to and standard support for our software application either in the FICO® Analytic Cloud or AWS, our primary cloud infrastructure provider, on a subscription basis. The transaction price typically includes a fixed consideration in the form of a guaranteed minimum that allows up to a certain level of usage and a variable consideration in the form of usage or transaction-based fees in excess of the minimum threshold; or usage or transaction-based variable amount not subject to a minimum threshold. We determined the nature of our SaaS arrangements is to provide continuous access to our hosted application in the cloud, i.e., a stand-ready obligation that comprises a series of distinct service periods (e.g., a series of distinct daily, monthly or annual periods of service). We estimate the total variable consideration at contract inception—subject to any constraints that may apply—and update the estimates as new information becomes available and recognize the amount ratably over the SaaS service period, unless we determine it is appropriate to allocate the variable amount to each distinct service period and recognize revenue as each distinct service period is performed.
We also derive transactional revenue from credit scoring and monitoring services that provide consumers access to their credit reports and enable them to monitor their credit. These are provided as either a one-time or ongoing subscription service renewed monthly or annually, all with a fixed consideration. We determined the nature of the subscription service is a stand-ready obligation to generate credit reports, provide credit monitoring and other services for our customers, which comprises a series of distinct service periods (e.g., a series of distinct daily, monthly or annual periods of service). Revenue from one-time or monthly subscription services is recognized during the feeperiod when service is performed. Revenue from annual subscription services is recognized ratably over the subscription period.
Professional services include software or SaaS implementation, consulting, model development, training services and premium cloud support. They are sold either standalone, or together with other products or services and generally represent distinct performance obligations. The transaction price can be a fixed amount or determinableon a time and collectionmaterials basis. Revenue on fixed-price services is probable. The determinationrecognized using an input method based on labor hours expended which we believe provides a faithful depiction of the transfer of services. Revenue on services provided on a time and materials basis is recognized applying the “right-to-invoice” practical expedient as the amount to which we have a right to invoice the customer corresponds directly with the value of our performance to the customer. In addition, we sell premium cloud support on a subscription basis for a fixed amount, and revenue is recognized ratably over the contract term.
Significant Judgments
Our contracts with customers often include promises to transfer multiple products and services to a customer. Determining whether feesproducts and services are fixedconsidered distinct and should be accounted for separately may require significant judgment. Specifically, when implementation service is included in the original software or determinable and collectionSaaS offerings, judgment is probable involvesrequired to determine if the use of assumptions. If atimplementation service significantly modifies or customizes the outset of an arrangement we determinesoftware or SaaS service in such a way that the arrangement feerisks of providing it and the customization service are inseparable. In rare instances, contracts may include significant modification or customization of the software of SaaS service and will result in the combination of software or SaaS service and implementation service as one performance obligation.
We determine the SSPs using data from our historical standalone sales, or, in instances where such information is not fixedavailable (such as when we do not sell the product or determinable, revenue is deferred untilservice separately), we consider factors such as the arrangement fee becomes fixed or determinable, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that collectability is not probable, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when collectability becomes probable or the receipt of payment. If there is uncertainty as to the customer’s acceptance ofstated contract prices, our deliverables, revenue is not recognized until the earlier of receipt of customer acceptance, expirationoverall pricing practices and objectives, go-to-market strategy, size and type of the acceptance period,transactions, and effects of the geographic area on pricing, among others. When the selling price of a product or whenservice is highly variable, we can demonstrate we meet the acceptance criteria. We evaluate contract terms and customer information to ensure that these criteria are met prior to our recognition of license fee revenue.
Wemay use the residual methodapproach to recognize revenuedetermine the SSP of that product or service. Significant judgment may be required to determine the SSP for each distinct performance obligation when it involves the consideration of many market conditions and entity-specific factors discussed above.
Significant judgment may be required to determine the timing of satisfaction of a software arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered atperformance obligation in certain professional services contracts with a future date provided the following criteria are met: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value does not exist for one or more of the delivered items but exists for all undelivered elements, (ii) all other applicable revenue recognition criteria are met and (iii) the fair value of all of the undelivered elements is less than the arrangement fee. VSOE of fair value isfixed consideration, in which we measure progress using an input method based on the normal pricing practices for those products and services when sold separately by us and customer renewal rates for post-contract customer support services. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. If evidence of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist, the revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be established. Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for those elements, the fair value of the respective elements, and change to a product’s estimated life cycle could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned revenue.
Revenues from post-contract customer support services, such as software maintenance, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period. The majority of our software maintenance agreements provide technical support as well as unspecified software product upgrades and releases when and if made available by us during the term of the support period.
Transactional-Based Revenues
Transactional-based revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. Revenues from our credit scoring, data processing, data management and SaaS subscription services are recognized as these services are performed. Revenues from transactional or unit-based license fees under software license arrangements, credit scoring, data processing, data management and SaaS subscription services agreements are recognized based on minimum contractual amounts or on system usage that exceeds minimum contractual amounts. Certain of our transactional-based revenues are based on transaction or active account volumes as reported by our clients.labor hours expended. In instances where volumes are reported to us in arrears, we estimate volumes based on preliminary customer transaction information or average actual reported volumes for an immediate trailing period. Differences between our estimates and actual final volumes reported are recorded in the period in which actual volumes are reported. We have not experienced significant variances between our estimates and actual reported volumes in the past and anticipate that we will be able to continue to make reasonable estimates in the future. If for some reason we were unable to reasonably estimate transaction volumes in the future, revenue may be deferred until actual customer data is received, and this could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Consulting Services
We provide consulting, training, model development and software integration services under both hourly-based time and materials and fixed-priced contracts. Revenues from these services are generally recognized as the services are performed. For fixed-price service contracts, we use a proportionate performance model with hours as the input method of attribution to determine progress towards completion, with consideration also given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when applicable. In such instances, management is requiredorder to estimate the total estimated hours of the project.project, we make assumptions about labor utilization, efficiency of processes, the customer’s specification and IT environment, among others. For certain complex projects, due to the risks and uncertainties inherent with the estimation process and factors relating to the assumptions, actual progress may differ due to the change in estimated total hours. Adjustments to estimates are made in the period in which the facts requiring such revisions become known and, accordingly, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Estimated losses, if any, are recorded in the period in which current estimates of total contract revenue and contract costs indicate a loss. If substantive uncertainty related to customer acceptance of services exists, we defer the associated revenue until the contract is completed.
Capitalized Commission Costs
We have not experienced significant variances between our estimates and actual hours in the past and anticipate that we will be able to continue to make reasonable estimates in the future. If for some reason we are unable to accurately estimate the input measures, revenue would be deferred until the contract is complete, and this could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Services that are sold in connection with software license arrangements generally qualify for separate accounting from the license element because they do not involve significant production, modification or customization of our products and are not otherwise considered to be essential to the functionality of our software. In arrangements where the professional services do not qualify for separate accounting from the license element, the combined software license and professional services revenue are recognized based on contract accounting using either the percentage-of-completion or completed-contract method.
Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements including Non-Software
When we enter into a multiple-deliverable arrangement that includes non-software, each deliverable is accounted forcapitalize incremental commission fees paid as a separate unitresult of accounting if the following criteriaobtaining customer contracts. Capitalized commission costs are met: (i) the delivered item or items have value to the customeramortized on a standalonestraight-line basis and (ii) for an arrangement that includesover ten years — determined using a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We consider a deliverable to have standalone value if we sell this item separately or if the item is sold by another vendor or could be resold by the customer; for example, we conclude professional services offered along with our SaaS subscription services typically have standalone value using this criteria. Further, our revenue arrangements generally do not include a general right of return relative to delivered products. Revenue for multiple element arrangements is allocated to the software and non-software deliverables based on a relative selling price. We use VSOE in our allocation of arrangement consideration when it is available. We define VSOE as a median price of recent standalone transactions that are priced within a narrow range, as defined by us. If a product or service is seldom sold separately, it is unlikely that we can determine VSOE. In circumstances when VSOE does not exist, we then assess whether we can obtain third-party evidence (“TPE”) of the selling price. It may be difficult for us to obtain sufficient information on competitor pricing to substantiate TPE and therefore we may not always be able to use TPE. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated selling price (“ESP”) in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact if the product or service were sold by us on a standalone basis. Our determination of ESP involves weighting several factorsportfolio approach — based on the specific factstransfer of goods or services to which the assets relate, taking into consideration both the initial and circumstances of each arrangement. The factors include, but are not limited to, geographies, market conditions, gross margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product lifecycle. Historically, there have been no significant changes in our ESP used in allocation of arrangement consideration. Wefuture contracts as we do not believe there istypically pay a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates.
If a deliverable does not have standalone value because the aforementioned criteria are not met, we combine it with the other applicable undelivered item(s) within the arrangement and account for the multiple deliverables as one combined unit of accounting. For example, for hosting arrangements requiring a highly specialized and unique set of initial implementation and setup services prior to the commencement of hosting services, we typically conclude that these implementation or setup services do not have value to the customercommission on a stand-alone basis; therefore, we combine them with the hosting services as a combined unit of accounting. Revenue is recognized upon commencementcontract renewal. The amortization costs are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses of our hosting services over the expected lifeconsolidated statements of the customer relationship.
Gross vs. Net Revenue Reportingincome and comprehensive income.
We apply accounting guidancea practical expedient to determine whether we report revenue for certain transactions based uponrecognize the gross amount billed to the customer, or the net amount retained by us. In accordance with the guidance we record revenue on a gross basis for sales in which we have acted as the principal and on a net basis for those sales in which we have in substance actedincremental costs of obtaining contracts as an agentexpense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that we otherwise would have recognized is one year or broker in the transaction.less. These costs are recorded within selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Business Combinations
Accounting for our acquisitions requires us to recognize, separately from goodwill, the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition-date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred and the net of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Accounting for business combinations requires our management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including our estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed, pre-acquisition contingencies and contingent consideration, where applicable. If we cannot reasonably determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) by the end of the measurement period, we will recognize an asset or a liability for such pre-acquisition contingency if: (i) it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Subsequent to the measurement period, changes in our estimates of such contingencies will affect earnings and could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include but are not limited to: (i)future expected cash flows from software license sales, support agreements, consulting contracts, other customer contracts and acquired developed technologies and patents; (ii) expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed; and (iii) the acquired company’s brand and competitive position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand will continue to be used in the combined company’s product portfolio. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. Historically, there have been no significant changes in our estimates or assumptions. To the extent a significant acquisition is made during a fiscal year, as appropriate we will expand the discussion to include specific assumptions and inputs used to determine the fair value of our acquired intangible assets.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We reevaluate these items quarterly based upon facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date with any adjustments to our preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill provided that we are within the measurement period. Subsequent to the measurement period or our final determination of the tax allowance’s or contingency’s estimated value, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances will affect our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Historically, there have been no significant changes in our valuation allowances or uncertain tax positions as it relates to business combinations. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates.
Goodwill, Acquisition Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets - Impairment Assessment
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. We assess goodwill for impairment for each of our reporting units on an annual basis during theour fourth fiscal quarter using a July 1 measurement date unless circumstances require a more frequent measurement. We have determined that our reporting units are the same as our reportable segments. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, we may first perform an assessment qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, referred to as a “step zero” approach. If, based on the review of the qualitative factors, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we would bypass the two-step impairment test. Events and circumstances we consider in performing the “step zero” qualitative assessment include macro-economic conditions, market and industry conditions, internal cost factors, share price fluctuations, and the operational stability and the overall financial performance of the reporting units. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount, we would perform the first step (“step one”) of the two-step impairment test and calculate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit by using discounted cash flow valuation models and by comparing our reporting units to guideline publicly-traded companies. These methods require estimates of our future revenues, profits, capital expenditures, working capital, and other relevant factors, as well as selecting appropriate guideline publicly-traded companies for each reporting unit. We estimate these amounts by evaluating historical trends, current budgets, operating plans, industry data, and other relevant factors. Using assumptions that are different from those used in our estimates, but in each case reasonable, could produce significantly different results and materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. For example, if the economic environment impacts our forecasts beyond what we have anticipated, it could cause the fair value of a reporting unit to fall below its respective carrying value.
For fiscal 20162017, we elected to proceed directly to the step one quantitative analysis for all of our reporting units. There was a substantial excess of fair value over carrying value for each of our reporting units and 2015,we determined goodwill was not impaired for any of our reporting units for fiscal 2017. For fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020, we performed a step zero qualitative analysis for our annual assessment of goodwill impairment. After evaluating and weighing all relevant events and circumstances, we concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of any of our reporting units was less their carrying amounts. Consequently, we did not perform a step one quantitative analysis. For fiscal 2017, we elected to proceed directly to the step one quantitative analysis for all of our reporting units, as three years had elapsed since the date of our previous quantitative valuation. There was a substantial excess of fair value over carrying value for each of our reporting units and we determined goodwill was not impaired for any of our reporting units for fiscal 2017.2018, 2019 and 2020.
Our intangible assets that have finite useful lives and other long-lived assets are assessed for potential impairment when there is evidence that events and circumstances related to our financial performance and economic environment indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. When impairment indicators are identified, we test for impairment using undiscounted cash flows. If such tests indicate impairment, then we measure and record the impairment as the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset. Significant management judgment is required in forecasting future operating results used in the preparation of the projected cash flows. Should different conditions prevail, material write downs of our intangible assets or other long-lived assets could occur. We review the estimated remaining useful lives of our acquired intangible assets at each reporting period. A reduction in our estimate of remaining useful lives, if any, could result in increased annual amortization expense in future periods. We did not recognize any impairment charges on intangible assets that have finite useful lives or other long-lived assets in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.
As discussed above, while we believe that the assumptions and estimates utilized were appropriate based on the information available to management, different assumptions, judgments and estimates could materially affect our impairment assessments for our goodwill, acquired intangibles with finite lives and other long-lived assets. Historically, there have been no significant changes in our estimates or assumptions that would have had a material impact for our goodwill or intangible assets impairment assessment. We believe our projected operating results and cash flows would need to be significantly less favorable to have a material impact on our impairment assessment. However, based upon our historical experience with operations, we do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood of a significant change in our projections.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize it as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting or service period, as applicable, of the stock award (generally three to four years). We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of our stock options and a Monte Carlo valuation model to determine the fair value of our market share units. Our valuation models and generally accepted valuation techniques require us to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the volatility of our stock price, expected dividend yield, employee turnover rates and employee stock option exercise behaviors. Historically, there have been no material changes in our estimates or assumptions. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions. See Note 1413 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our share-based employee benefit plans.
Income Taxes
We estimate our income taxes based on the various jurisdictions where we conduct business, which involves significant judgment in determining our income tax provision. We estimate our current tax liability using currently enacted tax rates and laws and assess temporary differences that result from differing treatments of certain items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheetssheet using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will apply to taxable income for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. We then assess the likelihood our deferred tax assets will be realized and to the extent we believe realization is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance. When we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in an accounting period, we record a corresponding income tax expense in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. In assessing the need for the valuation allowance, we consider future taxable income in the jurisdictions we operate; our ability to carry back tax attributes to prior years; an analysis of our deferred tax assets and the periods over which they will be realizable; and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. An increase in the valuation allowance would have an adverse impact, which could be material, on our income tax provision and net income in the period in which we record the increase. We have historically had minimal changes in our valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets, as described in Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We recognize and measure benefits for uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the technical merits of the tax position indicate it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. For tax positions more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions and they are evaluated on a quarterly basis. Our evaluations are based upon a number of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of audits and effective settlement of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in our income tax expense in the period in which we make the change, which could have a material impact on our effective tax rate and operating results. Historically, settlements related to our unrecognized tax benefits have been minimal, as described in Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
A description of our accounting policies associated with tax-related contingencies and valuation allowances assumed as part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are subject to various proceedings, lawsuits and claims relating to products and services, technology, labor, shareholderstockholder and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes and the potential range of probable losses in these matters. If the potential loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. If the potential loss is considered less than probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated, disclosure of the matter is considered. The amount of loss accrual or disclosure, if any, is determined after analysis of each matter, and is subject to adjustment if warranted by new developments or revised strategies. Due to uncertainties related to these matters, accruals or disclosures are based on the best information available at the time. Significant judgment is required in both the assessment of likelihood and in the determination of a range of potential losses. Revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. Historically, there have been no material changes in our estimates or assumptions. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective October 1,In February 2016, we early adopted ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. As a result of the adoption, we recognized $24.7 million of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments in our provision for income taxes during fiscal 2017. These items were historically recorded as additional paid-in capital. We elected to apply the change retrospectively in presentation to our consolidated statements of cash flows and no longer classified the excess tax benefits from employee stock plans as a reduction from operating cash flows, which resulted in increases to both net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities of $25.0 million and $13.8 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our adoption of ASU 2016-09 also impacted the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares under the treasury stock method as we no longer increase or decrease the assumed proceeds from the vesting of, or an employee exercising, a share-based payment award by the amount of excess tax benefits or deficiencies taken to additional paid-in capital. During fiscal 2017, the impact was immaterial. Given our historical practice of including employee withholding taxes paid within financing activities in the statement of cash flows, no prior period reclassifications are required by the clarifications on classification provided by ASU 2016-09. Furthermore, we elected to continue to estimate expected forfeitures of employee equity awards to determine the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in each period.
Effective October 1, 2016, we retrospectively adopted ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability, other than those relating to line-of-credit arrangements, in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. As a result of the adoption, at September 30, 2017, the amount of debt issuance costs reflected as a deduction of long-term debt was $0.2 million. At September 30, 2016, the amount of debt issuance costs reclassified from other assets to a deduction of long-term debt was $0.4 million.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09,2016-02, “Revenue from Contracts with CustomersLeases (Topic 606)842)” (“and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2014-09”2017-13, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and ASU 2019-01 (collectively, “Topic 842”). ASU 2014-09Topic 842 requires an entitythe recognition of operating lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. Under the new standard, disclosures are required to recognizeenable users of financial statements to assess the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. leases.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we adopted Topic 842 using the “Comparatives Under 840 Option” approach to transition. In accordance with the standard, the comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. Topic 842 provided a package of practical expedients that allow an entity to not reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts contain a lease, (2) the lease classification of any expired or existing lease, and (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We elected to apply the package of practical expedients, and did not elect the hindsight practical expedient in determining the lease term for existing leases as of October 1, 2019.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In August 2015,2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14,2018-15, “Deferral ofIntangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Internal-Use Software.” ASU 2018-15 aligns the Effective Date” (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers the effective daterequirements for ASU 2014-09 by one year. For public entities, the guidance in ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (including interim reporting periods within those periods), which means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted to the original effective date of December 15, 2016 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies thecapitalizing implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue recognition standard. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”), which reduces the complexity when applying the guidance for identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of the license implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”), which amends the guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. In December 2016, the FASB further issued ASU 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2016-20”), which makes minor corrections or minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. The amendments are intended to address implementation issues that were raised by stakeholders and provide additional practical expedients to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the new revenue standard. These amendments have the same effective date as the new revenue standard. Preliminarily, we plan to adopt Topic 606 in the first quarter of our fiscal 2019 using the retrospective transition method, and are continuing to evaluate the impact our pending adoption of Topic 606 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
We have established a cross-functional implementation team consisting of representatives across the organization to address the scope of work required to implement the recognition and disclosure requirements under the new standard. This cross-functional implementation team has developed a project plan, including evaluating customer contracts across the organization, developing policies, processes and tools to report financial results, and implementing and evaluating our internal controls over financial reporting that will be necessary under the new standard. We currently plan to adopt Topic 606 in the first quarter of our fiscal 2019 using the retrospective transition method. Our ability to adopt using the full retrospective method is dependent on system readiness, and the completion of our analysis of information necessary to restate prior period financial statements. As we continue to assess the new standard along with industry trends and additional interpretive guidance, we may adjust our implementation plan accordingly.
We are continuing to assess the impact of adopting Top 606 on our consolidated financial statements and believe the new standard will impact the following policies and disclosures:
Timing of revenue recognition of license revenue on term licenses and transactional revenue on guaranteed minimum fees related to our on-premises software products. Under the new standard, we expect to recognize revenue when control of the license is transferred to the customer, rather than at the date payments become due and payable, or ratably over the term of the contract required under the current standard;
Presentation of contract balances. Under the new standard, when we enter into noncancellable contracts that provide unconditional rights to payment from our customers for services that we have not yet completed providing or services we will provide in the near future, we expect to present the unconditional rights as receivables, regardless of whether cash has been received from customers;
Required disclosures including information about remaining transaction price and when we expect to recognize revenue; and
Accounting for commissions under the new standard will result in the deferral of incremental commission costs for obtaining contracts.
We do not currently expect Topic 606 to have a significant effect on the timing of revenue recognition for our maintenance or professional services revenues, or SaaS contracts.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”(“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. ASU 2016-16 should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings at the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued. We do not believe that adoption of ASU 2016-16 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize the expenses on their income statementsincurred in a manner similarcloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to current practice. ASU 2016-02 states that a lessee would recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-to-use asset for the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019, which means that it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2020. We do not believe that adoption of ASU 2018-15 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 (collectively, “Topic 326”). Topic 326 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, which means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2019. Early2020. We do not believe that adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing of our adoption and the impact that the updated standardTopic 326 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We do not expect that any other recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a significant effect on our financial statements.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Disclosures
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate
We maintain an investment portfolio consisting of bank deposits and money market funds. The funds provide daily liquidity and may be subject to interest rate risk and fall in value if market interest rates increase. We do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates. The following table presents the principal amounts and related weighted-average yields for our investments with interest rate risk at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2016 |
| | Cost Basis | | Carrying Amount | | Average Yield | | Cost Basis | | Carrying Amount | | Average Yield |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 105,618 |
| | $ | 105,618 |
| | 0.56 | % | | $ | 75,926 |
| | $ | 75,926 |
| | 0.17 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| | Cost Basis | | Carrying Amount | | Average Yield | | Cost Basis | | Carrying Amount | | Average Yield |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 157,394 |
| | $ | 157,394 |
| | 0.05 | % | | $ | 106,426 |
| | $ | 106,426 |
| | 0.76 | % |
In May 2008,On July 14, 2010, we issued $275$245 million of senior notes in a private placement to a group of institutional investors, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of which was paid in a private placementfull at maturity on July 14, 2020 (the “2008“2010 Senior Notes”). In July 2010On May 8, 2018, we issued an additional $245$400 million of senior notes to a group of institutional investors in a private placementoffering to qualified institutional investors (the “2010“2018 Senior Notes” and,). On December 6, 2019, we issued $350 million of senior notes in a private offering to qualified institutional investors (the “2019 Senior Notes,” along with the 20082010 Senior Notes and 2018 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”). The fair value of the Senior Notes may increase or decrease due to various factors, including fluctuations in market interest rates and fluctuations in general economic conditions. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Capital Resources and Liquidity for additional information on the Senior Notes. The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values for the Senior Notes at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| | Face Value (*) | | Fair Value | | Face Value (*) | | Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) |
| The 2010 Senior Notes | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 85,000 |
| | $ | 86,121 |
|
| The 2018 Senior Notes | 400,000 |
| | 442,000 |
| | 400,000 |
| | 428,000 |
|
| The 2019 Senior Notes | 350,000 |
| | 358,750 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 750,000 |
|
| $ | 800,750 |
|
| $ | 485,000 |
|
| $ | 514,121 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2016 |
| | Carrying Amounts | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amounts | | Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) |
| The 2008 Senior Notes | $ | 131,000 |
| | $ | 134,250 |
| | $ | 131,000 |
| | $ | 139,902 |
|
| The 2010 Senior Notes | 113,000 |
| | 119,106 |
| | 185,000 |
| | 195,715 |
|
| Debt issuance costs | (199 | ) | | $ | (199 | ) | | (376 | ) | | (376 | ) |
| Total | $ | 243,801 |
|
| $ | 253,157 |
|
| $ | 315,624 |
|
| $ | 335,241 |
|
(*) The carrying value of the Senior Notes was reduced by the net debt issuance costs of $10.6 million and $5.2 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
We have interest rate risk with respect to our $500$400 million unsecured revolving line of credit. Interest on amounts borrowed under the credit facility is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.500% and (c) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.000%, plus, in each case, an applicable margin, or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate borrowings ranges from 0% to 0.875% and for LIBOR borrowings ranges from 1.000% to 1.875% and is determined based on our consolidated leverage ratio. A change in interest rates on this variable rate debt impacts the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not impact the fair value of the instrument. We had $361.0$95.0 million in borrowings outstanding at a weighted averageweighted-average interest of 2.365%1.285% under the credit facility as of September 30, 2017.2020.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
We use derivative instruments to manage risks caused by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The primary objective of our derivative instruments is to protect the value of foreign-currency-denominated receivable and cash balances from the effects of volatility in foreign exchange rates that might occur prior to conversion to their functional currencies. We principally utilize foreign currency forward contracts, which enable us to buy and sell foreign currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates and economically offset changes in foreign exchange rates. We routinely enter into contracts to offset exposures denominated in the British pound, Euro and Euro.Singapore dollar.
Foreign-currency-denominated receivable and cash balances are remeasured at foreign exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet date with the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates reported in other income, (expense), net. The forward contracts are not designated as hedges and are marked to market through other income, (expense), net. Fair value changes in the forward contracts help mitigate the changes in the value of the remeasured receivable and cash balances attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The forward contracts are short-term in nature and typically have average maturities at inception of less than three months.
The following tables summarize our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts, by currency, at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
| | | | September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2020 |
| | Contract Amount | | Fair Value | Contract Amount | | Fair Value |
| | Foreign Currency | | US$ | | US$ | Foreign Currency | | USD | | USD |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Sell foreign currency: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Euro (EUR) | EUR | 5,050 |
| | $ | 5,968 |
| | — |
| EUR | 15,000 |
| | $ | 17,656 |
| | — |
|
| Buy foreign currency: | | | | | | | | | | |
| British pound (GBP) | GBP | 9,341 |
| | $ | 12,500 |
| | — |
| GBP | 16,555 |
| | $ | 21,300 |
| | — |
|
| Singapore dollar (SGD) | | SGD | 7,815 |
| | $ | 5,700 |
| | — |
|
| | | | September 30, 2016 | September 30, 2019 |
| | Contract Amount | | Fair Value | Contract Amount | | Fair Value |
| | Foreign Currency | | US$ | | US$ | Foreign Currency | | USD | | USD |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Sell foreign currency: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Euro (EUR) | EUR | 7,850 |
| | $ | 8,743 |
| | — |
| EUR | 10,800 |
| | $ | 11,723 |
| | — |
|
| Buy foreign currency: | | | | | | | | | | |
| British pound (GBP) | GBP | 7,721 |
| | $ | 10,000 |
| | — |
| GBP | 5,200 |
| | $ | 6,400 |
| | — |
|
| Singapore dollar (SGD) | | SGD | 5,798 |
| | $ | 4,200 |
| | — |
|
The foreign currency forward contracts were entered into on September 30 of each fiscal year; therefore, the fair value was $0 on September 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Fair Isaac Corporation
San Jose, California
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Fair Isaac Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidated statements of incomeIncome and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017.2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017,2020, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2020 and 2019, and the results of operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America . Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in fiscal year 2020 due to adoption of the new lease standard (Topic 842). The Company'sCompany adopted the new lease standard using the modified retrospective approach.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Reportreport on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
InCritical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, referredtaken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to above present fairly, in all material respects,which it relates.
Revenues -Refer to Note 1 to the financial positionstatement
Critical Audit Matter Description
The company recognizes revenue when control of the promised goods or services in a contract is transferred to the customer, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Company's revenue is primarily derived from term-based or perpetual licensing of software and scoring products and solutions, and associated maintenance; software-as-a service (SaaS) subscription services; scoring and credit monitoring services for customers; and professional services.
The Company's contracts with customers often includes promises to transfer multiple products and services to a customer. For contracts with customers that contain various combinations of products and services, the Company evaluates weather the product or service are distinct. Distinct product or services will be accounted for as separate performance obligations, while non distinct products or services are combined with others to form a single performance obligation.
For transactional revenue, the transaction price for contracts with customers typically includes a fixed consideration in the form of a guaranteed minimum that allows up to a certain level of usage and subsidiariesa variable consideration in the form of usage or transaction-based fees in excess of the minimum threshold; or usage or transaction-based variable amount not subject to a minimum threshold.
For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis. The Company determines the SSP using data from historical standalone sales, or, in instances where such information is not available, the Company considers factors such as the stated contract prices, their overall pricing practices and objectives, go-to-market strategy, size and type of September 30, 2017the transactions, and 2016,effects of the geographic area on pricing, among others.
Given the complexity of certain of the Company’s contracts, together with the judgment involved in identifying performance obligations, estimating variable consideration, and determining SSP, auditing the related revenue required both extensive audit effort due to the volume and complexity of the contracts and a high degree of auditor judgment when performing audit procedures and evaluating the results of their operationsthose procedures.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to revenue recognition and their cash flowsthe Company’s identification of performance obligations, estimation of variable consideration, and determination of SSP included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of controls over contract revenue, including management’s controls over the identification of performance obligations, estimation of variable consideration, and determination of the SSP.
We selected a sample of contracts and performed the following procedures:
-Obtained and read the contract, including master agreements, renewal agreements, and other source documents that were part of the contract.
-Obtained other contracts with the same customer that were entered into at or near the same time and evaluated management’s conclusion of whether two or more contracts for multiple products and services promised to a customer should be combined and accounted for as a single contract for revenue recognition.
-Confirmed the terms of the contract directly with the customer, including whether there are side agreements and terms not formally included in the contract that may impact the identification of performance obligations and revenue recognition and performed alternative procedures in the event of nonreplies.
-Evaluated internal certification letters provided by the Company’s sales personnel to identify the existence of side agreements that may impact the identification of performance obligations and revenue recognition.
-Tested management’s identification of the performance obligations within the customer contract, including whether material rights that gave rise to a performance obligation were identified.
-Tested management’s estimation of variable consideration in the transaction price by evaluating the reasonableness of the inputs used in management’s estimates.
-Tested the accuracy and completeness of the data and factors used in management’s determination of the SSP for each performance obligation.
-Evaluated the consistency of the three years inmethodologies used to develop the period ended September 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
SSP for each performance obligation.
|
|
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
| San Diego, CA |
November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004. |
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | September 30, | September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In thousands, except par value data) | (In thousands, except par value data) |
Assets | | Current assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 105,618 |
| | $ | 75,926 |
| $ | 157,394 |
| | $ | 106,426 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 168,586 |
| | 167,786 |
| 334,180 |
| | 297,427 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 36,727 |
| | 23,926 |
| 42,504 |
| | 51,853 |
|
| Total current assets | 310,931 |
| | 267,638 |
| 534,078 |
| | 455,706 |
|
| Marketable securities available for sale | 13,791 |
| | 11,016 |
| |
| Marketable securities | | 25,513 |
| | 20,222 |
|
| Other investments | 11,724 |
| | 10,920 |
| 1,060 |
| | 1,643 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 40,703 |
| | 45,122 |
| 46,419 |
| | 53,027 |
|
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | | 57,656 |
| | — |
|
| Goodwill | 804,414 |
| | 798,415 |
| 812,364 |
| | 803,542 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 21,185 |
| | 33,619 |
| 9,236 |
| | 14,139 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 47,204 |
| | 47,598 |
| 14,629 |
| | 6,006 |
|
| Other assets | 5,668 |
| | 6,348 |
| 105,285 |
| | 79,163 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 1,255,620 |
| | $ | 1,220,676 |
| $ | 1,606,240 |
| | $ | 1,433,448 |
|
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 19,510 |
| | $ | 22,952 |
| $ | 23,033 |
| | $ | 23,118 |
|
| Accrued compensation and employee benefits | 77,610 |
| | 71,216 |
| 117,952 |
| | 106,240 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 32,104 |
| | 27,780 |
| 63,367 |
| | 32,454 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 55,431 |
| | 47,129 |
| 115,159 |
| | 111,016 |
|
| Current maturities on debt | 142,000 |
| | 77,000 |
| 95,000 |
| | 218,000 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 326,655 |
| | 246,077 |
| 414,511 |
| | 490,828 |
|
| Long-term debt | 462,801 |
| | 493,624 |
| 739,435 |
| | 606,790 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities | | 73,207 |
| | — |
|
| Other liabilities | 39,627 |
| | 34,147 |
| 48,005 |
| | 46,063 |
|
| Total liabilities | 829,083 |
| | 773,848 |
| 1,275,158 |
| | 1,143,681 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies |
| |
|
| |
|
| Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding) | — |
| | — |
| 0 |
| | 0 |
|
| Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized, 88,857 shares issued and 30,243 and 30,935 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively) | 302 |
| | 309 |
| |
| Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized, 88,857 shares issued and 29,096 and 28,944 shares outstanding at September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively) | | 291 |
| | 289 |
|
| Paid-in-capital | 1,195,431 |
| | 1,188,913 |
| 1,218,583 |
| | 1,225,365 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost (58,614 and 57,922 shares at September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively) | (2,301,097 | ) | | (2,136,760 | ) | |
| Treasury stock, at cost (59,761 and 59,913 shares at September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively) | | (2,997,856 | ) | | (2,802,450 | ) |
| Retained earnings | 1,598,395 |
| | 1,471,377 |
| 2,193,059 |
| | 1,956,648 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (66,494 | ) | | (77,011 | ) | (82,995 | ) | | (90,085 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 426,537 |
| | 446,828 |
| 331,082 |
| | 289,767 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,255,620 |
| | $ | 1,220,676 |
| $ | 1,606,240 |
| | $ | 1,433,448 |
|
See accompanying notes.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 652,660 |
| | $ | 605,919 |
| | $ | 564,232 |
| $ | 973,933 |
| | $ | 860,948 |
| | $ | 750,603 |
|
| Professional services | 179,569 |
| | 169,738 |
| | 151,773 |
| 183,040 |
| | 184,095 |
| | 176,910 |
|
| License | 99,940 |
| | 105,699 |
| | 122,776 |
| 137,589 |
| | 115,040 |
| | 72,633 |
|
| Total revenues | 932,169 |
| | 881,356 |
| | 838,781 |
| 1,294,562 |
| | 1,160,083 |
| | 1,000,146 |
|
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues (1) | 287,123 |
| | 265,173 |
| | 270,535 |
| 361,142 |
| | 336,845 |
| | 312,898 |
|
| Research and development | 110,870 |
| | 103,669 |
| | 98,824 |
| 166,499 |
| | 149,478 |
| | 128,383 |
|
Selling, general and administrative (1) | 339,796 |
| | 328,940 |
| | 300,002 |
| 420,930 |
| | 414,086 |
| | 376,912 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets (1) | 12,709 |
| | 13,982 |
| | 13,673 |
| 4,993 |
| | 6,126 |
| | 6,594 |
|
| Restructuring and acquisition-related | 4,471 |
| | — |
| | 18,242 |
| |
| Restructuring and impairment charges | | 45,029 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 754,969 |
| | 711,764 |
| | 701,276 |
| 998,593 |
| | 906,535 |
| | 824,787 |
|
| Operating income | 177,200 |
| | 169,592 |
| | 137,505 |
| 295,969 |
| | 253,548 |
| | 175,359 |
|
| Interest expense, net | (25,790 | ) | | (26,633 | ) | | (29,150 | ) | (42,177 | ) | | (39,752 | ) | | (31,311 | ) |
| Other income (expense), net | (86 | ) | | 1,610 |
| | 883 |
| |
| Other income, net | | 3,208 |
| | 2,276 |
| | 12,884 |
|
| Income before income taxes | 151,324 |
| | 144,569 |
| | 109,238 |
| 257,000 |
| | 216,072 |
| | 156,932 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | 23,068 |
| | 35,121 |
| | 22,736 |
| 20,589 |
| | 23,948 |
| | 30,450 |
|
| Net income | 128,256 |
| | 109,448 |
| | 86,502 |
| 236,411 |
| | 192,124 |
| | 126,482 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | 10,517 |
| | (26,296 | ) | | (27,526 | ) | 7,090 |
| | (13,664 | ) | | (9,926 | ) |
| Comprehensive income | $ | 138,773 |
| | $ | 83,152 |
| | $ | 58,976 |
| $ | 243,501 |
| | $ | 178,460 |
| | $ | 116,556 |
|
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 4.16 |
| | $ | 3.52 |
| | $ | 2.75 |
| $ | 8.13 |
| | $ | 6.63 |
| | $ | 4.26 |
|
| Shares used in computing basic earnings per share | 30,862 |
| | 31,129 |
| | 31,402 |
| 29,067 |
| | 28,980 |
| | 29,711 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 3.98 |
| | $ | 3.39 |
| | $ | 2.65 |
| $ | 7.90 |
| | $ | 6.34 |
| | $ | 4.06 |
|
| Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share | 32,245 |
| | 32,308 |
| | 32,609 |
| 29,932 |
| | 30,294 |
| | 31,180 |
|
| |
(1) | Cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses exclude the amortization of intangible assets. See Note 7. |
See accompanying notes.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018
(In thousands, except per share data)
| | | | Common Stock | | | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | Common Stock | | | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| | Shares | | Par Value | | Paid-in- Capital | | Treasury Stock | | Retained Earnings | | |
| Balance at September 30, 2014 | 32,047 |
| | $ | 320 |
| | $ | 1,133,154 |
| | $ | (1,936,095 | ) | | $ | 1,280,424 |
| | $ | (23,189 | ) | | $ | 454,614 |
| |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 45,308 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45,308 |
| |
| Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | 954 |
| | 10 |
| | (34,366 | ) | | 33,153 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,203 | ) | |
| Tax effect from share-based payment arrangements | — |
| | — |
| | 12,530 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,530 |
| |
| Repurchases of common stock | (1,711 | ) | | (17 | ) | | — |
| | (130,702 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (130,719 | ) | |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,508 | ) | | — |
| | (2,508 | ) | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 86,502 |
| | — |
| | 86,502 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (27,526 | ) | | (27,526 | ) | |
| Balance at September 30, 2015 | 31,290 |
| | 313 |
|
| 1,156,626 |
|
| (2,033,644 | ) |
| 1,364,418 |
|
| (50,715 | ) | | 436,998 |
| |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 55,509 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 55,509 |
| |
| Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | 980 |
| | 10 |
| | (47,406 | ) | | 35,269 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (12,127 | ) | |
| Tax effect from share-based payment arrangements | — |
| | — |
| | 24,184 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 24,184 |
| |
| Repurchases of common stock | (1,335 | ) | | (14 | ) | | — |
| | (138,385 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (138,399 | ) | |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,489 | ) | | — |
| | (2,489 | ) | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 109,448 |
| | — |
| | 109,448 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (26,296 | ) | | (26,296 | ) | |
| Balance at September 30, 2016 | 30,935 |
| | 309 |
|
| 1,188,913 |
|
| (2,136,760 | ) |
| 1,471,377 |
|
| (77,011 | ) | | 446,828 |
| |
| (In thousands) | | Shares | | Par Value | | Paid-in- Capital | | Treasury Stock | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| Balance at September 30, 2017 | | 30,243 |
| | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 1,195,431 |
| | $ | (2,301,097 | ) | | $ | 1,638,042 |
| |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 61,222 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 61,222 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 74,814 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 74,814 |
|
| Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | 774 |
| | 8 |
| | (54,704 | ) | | 28,938 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (25,758 | ) | 633 |
| | 7 |
| | (59,194 | ) | | 26,006 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (33,181 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock | (1,466 | ) | | (15 | ) | | — |
| | (193,275 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (193,290 | ) | (1,861 | ) | | (19 | ) | | — |
| | (336,916 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (336,935 | ) |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,238 | ) | | — |
| | (1,238 | ) | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 128,256 |
| | — |
| | 128,256 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 126,482 |
| | — |
| | 126,482 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,517 |
| | 10,517 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9,926 | ) | | (9,926 | ) |
| Balance at September 30, 2017 | 30,243 |
|
| $ | 302 |
|
| $ | 1,195,431 |
|
| $ | (2,301,097 | ) |
| $ | 1,598,395 |
|
| $ | (66,494 | ) |
| $ | 426,537 |
| |
| Balance at September 30, 2018 | | 29,015 |
| | 290 |
|
| 1,211,051 |
|
| (2,612,007 | ) |
| 1,764,524 |
|
| (76,421 | ) | | 287,437 |
|
| Share-based compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 82,973 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 82,973 |
|
| Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | | 854 |
| | 8 |
| | (68,659 | ) | | 38,442 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (30,209 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock | | (925 | ) | | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (228,885 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (228,894 | ) |
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 192,124 |
| | — |
| | 192,124 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (13,664 | ) | | (13,664 | ) |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | | 28,944 |
| | 289 |
|
| 1,225,365 |
|
| (2,802,450 | ) |
| 1,956,648 |
|
| (90,085 | ) | | 289,767 |
|
| Share-based compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 93,681 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 93,681 |
|
| Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | | 827 |
| | 9 |
| | (100,463 | ) | | 39,810 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (60,644 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock | | (675 | ) | | (7 | ) | | — |
| | (235,216 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (235,223 | ) |
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 236,411 |
| | — |
| | 236,411 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,090 |
| | 7,090 |
|
| Balance at September 30, 2020 | | 29,096 |
|
| $ | 291 |
|
| $ | 1,218,583 |
|
| $ | (2,997,856 | ) |
| $ | 2,193,059 |
|
| $ | (82,995 | ) |
| $ | 331,082 |
|
See accompanying notes.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 236,411 |
| | $ | 192,124 |
| | $ | 126,482 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 30,367 |
| | 31,612 |
| | 30,182 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 93,681 |
| | 82,973 |
| | 74,814 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | (8,639 | ) | | 7,701 |
| | 10,584 |
|
| Non-cash operating lease costs | 20,011 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Impairment loss on operating lease assets | 28,016 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Provision of doubtful accounts | 3,199 |
| | 518 |
| | 623 |
|
| Net gain (loss) on marketable securities | (2,071 | ) | | 761 |
| | (1,449 | ) |
| Gain on sale of equity investments | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | (10,000 | ) |
| Net loss on sales and abandonment of property and equipment | 5,249 |
| | 127 |
| | 231 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (59,889 | ) | | (36,176 | ) | | (8,266 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | (960 | ) | | (55,507 | ) | | (9,790 | ) |
| Accounts payable | 1,059 |
| | 1,885 |
| | 843 |
|
| Accrued compensation and employee benefits | 12,065 |
| | 22,380 |
| | 7,352 |
|
| Other liabilities | 693 |
| | 1,463 |
| | 6,246 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 5,724 |
| | 10,489 |
| | (4,800 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 364,916 |
| | 260,350 |
| | 223,052 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | (21,989 | ) | | (23,981 | ) | | (31,299 | ) |
| Proceeds from sales of marketable securities | 3,470 |
| | 3,480 |
| | 3,230 |
|
| Purchases of marketable securities | (6,119 | ) | | (6,404 | ) | | (6,050 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of equity investments | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 20,000 |
|
| Distribution from equity investments | 55 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
|
| Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | 0 |
| | (15,855 | ) | | 0 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (24,583 | ) | | (42,760 | ) | | (14,119 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Proceeds from revolving line of credit | 263,000 |
| | 229,000 |
| | 427,000 |
|
| Payments on revolving line of credit | (513,000 | ) | | (141,000 | ) | | (531,000 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of senior notes | 350,000 |
| | 0 |
| | 400,000 |
|
| Payments on senior notes | (85,000 | ) | | (28,000 | ) | | (131,000 | ) |
| Payments on debt issuance costs | (6,840 | ) | | 0 |
| | (7,849 | ) |
| Payments on finance leases | (1,716 | ) | | (945 | ) | | 0 |
|
| Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | 42,258 |
| | 22,788 |
| | 11,023 |
|
| Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards | (102,903 | ) | | (52,996 | ) | | (44,205 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock | (235,223 | ) | | (228,894 | ) | | (342,596 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (289,424 | ) | | (200,047 | ) | | (218,627 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 59 |
| | (1,140 | ) | | (5,901 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 50,968 |
| | 16,403 |
| | (15,595 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 106,426 |
| | 90,023 |
| | 105,618 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 157,394 |
| | $ | 106,426 |
| | $ | 90,023 |
|
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds of $1,931, $1,372 and $3,079 during the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively | $ | 10,152 |
| | $ | 18,779 |
| | $ | 13,398 |
|
| Cash paid for interest | $ | 37,735 |
| | $ | 39,924 |
| | $ | 26,106 |
|
| Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | |
| Finance lease obligation incurred | $ | 1,387 |
| | $ | 5,803 |
| | $ | 0 |
|
| Purchase of property and equipment included in accounts payable | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 1,448 |
| | $ | 1,913 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 128,256 |
| | $ | 109,448 |
| | $ | 86,502 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 36,214 |
| | 31,633 |
| | 33,889 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 61,222 |
| | 55,509 |
| | 45,308 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | (6,049 | ) | | (26,007 | ) | | (5,934 | ) |
| Tax effect from share-based payment arrangements | — |
| | 24,184 |
| | 12,530 |
|
| Provision of doubtful accounts | 1,640 |
| | 2,011 |
| | — |
|
| Net loss on sales of property and equipment | 14 |
| | 6 |
| | 2,210 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (1,265 | ) | | (18,225 | ) | | (4,602 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | (7,115 | ) | | 12,848 |
| | (15,462 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (2,027 | ) | | 564 |
| | (3,672 | ) |
| Accrued compensation and employee benefits | 6,464 |
| | 17,079 |
| | (1,506 | ) |
| Other liabilities | (683 | ) | | (4,282 | ) | | 4,113 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 8,973 |
| | 5,500 |
| | (6,604 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 225,644 |
| | 210,268 |
| | 146,772 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | (19,828 | ) | | (21,969 | ) | | (24,999 | ) |
| Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (5,683 | ) | | (56,992 | ) |
| Distribution from (purchase of) cost method investees | (777 | ) | | 37 |
| | 75 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (20,605 | ) | | (27,615 | ) | | (81,916 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Proceeds from revolving line of credit | 190,000 |
| | 122,000 |
| | 249,000 |
|
| Payments on revolving line of credit | (84,000 | ) | | (99,000 | ) | | (116,000 | ) |
| Payments on senior notes | (72,000 | ) | | (60,000 | ) | | (71,000 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans | 14,474 |
| | 17,828 |
| | 18,258 |
|
| Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards | (40,232 | ) | | (29,955 | ) | | (19,461 | ) |
| Dividends paid | (1,238 | ) | | (2,489 | ) | | (2,508 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock | (187,629 | ) | | (138,399 | ) | | (130,719 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (180,625 | ) | | (190,015 | ) | | (72,430 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 5,278 |
| | (2,832 | ) | | (11,381 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 29,692 |
| | (10,194 | ) | | (18,955 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 75,926 |
| | 86,120 |
| | 105,075 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 105,618 |
| | $ | 75,926 |
| | $ | 86,120 |
|
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds of $3,757, $11,363 and $1,592 during the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | $ | 31,315 |
| | $ | 10,855 |
| | $ | 33,752 |
|
| Cash paid for interest | $ | 26,083 |
| | $ | 26,884 |
| | $ | 30,470 |
|
| Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | |
| Unsettled repurchases of common stock | $ | 5,661 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Purchase of property and equipment included in accounts payable | $ | 1,751 |
| | $ | 3,287 |
| | $ | 436 |
|
See accompanying notes.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018
1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Fair Isaac Corporation
Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) is a provider of analytic, software and data management products and services that enable businesses to automate, improve and connect decisions. FICO provides a range of analytical solutions, credit scoring and credit account management products and services to banks, credit reporting agencies, credit card processing agencies, insurers, retailers, healthcare organizations and public agencies.
In these consolidated financial statements, FICO is referred to as “we,” “us,” “our,” or “the Company.”
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Effective October 1, 2019, we adopted ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2017-13, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and ASU 2019-01 (collectively, “Topic 842”) using the modified retrospective approach, under which financial results reported in prior periods were not restated. As a result, the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 is not comparable with that as of September 30, 2019. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 filed with the SEC on November 8, 2019 for lease policies that were in effect in prior periods before adoption of Topic 842.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FICO and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
We make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures made in the accompanying notes. For example, we use estimates in determining the collectibility of accounts receivable; the appropriate levels of various accruals; variable considerations included in the transaction price for our customer contracts; labor hours in connection with fixed-fee service contracts; the amount of our tax provision and the realizability of deferred tax assets. We also use estimates in determining the remaining economic lives and carrying values of acquired intangible assets, property and equipment, and other long-lived assets. In addition, we use assumptions to estimate the fair value of reporting units and share-based compensation. Actual results may differ from our estimates.
As the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty and therefore require increased judgment. These estimates and assumptions may change in future periods and will be recognized in the consolidated financial statements as new events occur and additional information becomes known. To the extent our actual results differ materially from those estimates and assumptions, our future financial statements could be affected. For more information, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less at time of purchase.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation and employee benefits, other accrued liabilities and amounts outstanding under our revolving line of credit, approximate their carrying amounts because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair values of our cash and cash equivalents and marketable security investments are disclosed in Note 4. The fair value of our derivative instruments is disclosed in Note 5. The fair value of our senior notes is disclosed in Note 10.9.
Investments
Management determines the appropriate classification of our investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase, and re-evaluates this designation at each balance sheet date. While it is our intent to hold debt securities to maturity, our investments in U.S. government obligations and marketable equity and debt securities that have readily determinable fair values are classified as available-for-sale, as the sale of such securities may be required prior to maturity to implement management strategies. Therefore, such securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses related to these securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The fair value of marketable securities is based upon inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar assets. Realized gains and losses are included in other income (expense), net on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The cost of investments sold is based on the specific identification method. Losses resulting from other than temporary declines in fair value are charged to operations. Investments with remaining maturities over one year are classified as long-term investments.
Our investments in equity securities of companies over which we do not have significant influence are accounted for under the cost method. The investment is originally recorded at cost and adjusted for additional contributions or distributions. Management periodically reviews cost-method investments for instances where fair value is less than the carrying amount and the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary. If the decline in value is judged to be other than temporary, the carrying amount of the security is written down to fair value and the resulting loss is charged to operations. We currently do not have investments in which we own 20% to 50% and exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, therefore we do not account for any investment under the equity method.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
Investments
We categorize our investments in debt and equity instruments as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity at the time of purchase. Trading securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in income (expense). Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities with unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Dividends and interest income are accrued as earned. Realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis and are included in other income (expense). We review marketable securities for impairment whenever circumstances and situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recovered. We did not classify any securities as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale during each of the three years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Investments with remaining maturities over one year are classified as long-term investments.
We have certain other investments for which there is no readily determinable fair value. These investments are recorded at cost, less impairment (if any) plus or minus adjustments for observable price changes. The carrying value of these investments was $1.1 million and $1.6 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and they are reported in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2020, we reviewed the carrying value of these investments and concluded that they were not impaired and as of that date, we were unable to exercise significant influence over the investees.
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable, which are generally not collateralized. Our policy is to place our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities with high quality financial institutions, commercial corporations and government agencies in order to limit the amount of credit exposure. We have established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities for maintaining safety and liquidity. We generally do not require collateral from our customers, but our credit extension and collection policies include analyzing the financial condition of potential customers, establishing credit limits, monitoring payments, and aggressively pursuing delinquent accounts. We maintain allowances for potential credit losses.
A significant portion of our revenues are derived from the sales of products and services to the consumer credit and banking industries.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized, while repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Assets acquired under capital leases are included in property and equipment with corresponding depreciation included in accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization charges are calculated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
| | | |
| | Estimated Useful Life |
| Data processing equipment and software | 3 years | to | 6 years |
| Office furniture and equipment | 3 years | to | 7 years |
| Leasehold improvements | Shorter of estimated
useful life or lease term
|
| Equipment under capital lease | Shorter of estimated
useful life or lease term |
The cost and accumulated depreciation for property and equipment sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the applicable accounts and resulting gains or losses are recorded in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Depreciation and amortization on property and equipment totaled $23.0$23.5 million, $17.7$24.2 million and $20.2$22.6 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Internal-Use Software
Costs incurred to develop internal-use software during the application development stage are capitalized and reported at cost. Application development stage costs generally include costs associated with internal-use software configuration, coding, installation and testing. Costs of significant upgrades and enhancements that result in additional functionality are also capitalized whereas costs incurred for maintenance and minor upgrades and enhancements are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over two to three years. Software development costs required to be capitalized for internal-use software have not been material to date.
Capitalized Software and Research and Development Costs
Software development costs relating to products to be sold in the normal course of business are expensed as incurred as research and development costs until technological feasibility is established. Technological feasibility for our products occurs approximately concurrently with the general release of our products; accordingly, we have not capitalized any development or production costs. Costs we incur to maintain and support our existing products after the general release of the product are expensed in the period they are incurred and included in research and development costs in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Goodwill, Acquisition Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. We assess goodwill for impairment for each of our reporting units on an annual basis during theour fourth fiscal quarter using a July 1 measurement date unless circumstances require a more frequent measurement. We have determined that our reporting units are the same as our reportable segments. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, we may first perform an assessment qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, referred to as a “step zero” approach. If, based on the review of the qualitative factors, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we would bypass the two-step impairment test. Events and circumstances we consider in performing the “step zero” qualitative assessment include macro-economic conditions, market and industry conditions, internal cost factors, share price fluctuations, and the operational stability and the overall financial performance of the reporting units. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount, we would perform the first step (“step one”) of the two-step impairment test and calculate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit by using discounted cash flow valuation models and by comparing our reporting units to guideline publicly-traded companies. These methods require estimates of our future revenues, profits, capital expenditures, working capital, and other relevant factors, as well as selecting appropriate guideline publicly-traded companies for each reporting unit. We estimate these amounts by evaluating historical trends, current budgets, operating plans, industry data, and other relevant factors. Alternatively, we may bypass the qualitative assessment described above for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing step one of the goodwill impairment test.
For fiscal 20162017, we elected to proceed directly to the step one quantitative analysis for all of our reporting units. There was a substantial excess of fair value over carrying value for each of our reporting units and 2015,we determined goodwill was not impaired for any of our reporting units for fiscal 2017. For fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020, we performed a step zero qualitative analysis for our annual assessment of goodwill impairment. After evaluating and weighing all relevant events and circumstances, we concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of any of our reporting units was less their carrying amounts. Consequently, we did not perform a step one quantitative analysis. For fiscal 2017, we elected to proceed directly to the step one quantitative analysis for all of our reporting units, as three years had elapsed since the date of our previous quantitative valuation. There was a substantial excess of fair value over carrying value for each of our reporting units and we determined goodwill was not impaired for any of our reporting units for fiscal 2017.2018, 2019 and 2020.
We amortize our finite-lived intangible assets which result from our acquisitions over the following estimated useful lives:
|
| | | |
| | Estimated Useful Life |
| Completed technology | 4 years | to | 10 years |
| Customer contracts and relationships | 5 years | to 15 | 10 years |
| Trade names | 1 year | to | 3 years |
| Non-compete agreements | 2 years |
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Our intangible assets that have finite useful lives and other long-lived assets are assessed for potential impairment when there is evidence that events and circumstances related to our financial performance and economic environment indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. When impairment indicators are identified, we test for impairment using undiscounted cash flows. If such tests indicate impairment, then we measure and record the impairment as the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset. We did not recognize any impairment charges on intangible assets that have finite useful lives or other long-lived assets in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.
Revenue Recognition
Software LicensesContracts with Customers
Software license feeOur revenue is primarily derived from term-based or perpetual licensing of software and scoring products and solutions, and associated maintenance; software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) subscription services; scoring and credit monitoring services for consumers; and professional services. For contracts with customers that contain various combinations of products and services, we evaluate whether the products or services are distinct — distinct products or services will be accounted for as separate performance obligations, while non-distinct products or services are combined with others to form a single performance obligation. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative SSP basis. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidencecontrol of an arrangement exists,the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers.
License revenue is derived from contracts in which we grant our direct customers or distributors the right to deploy or resell our software and scoring products and solutions on-premises. Our software offerings often include a perpetual or term-based license and post-contract support or maintenance, both of which generally represent distinct performance obligations and are accounted for separately. The transaction price is either in the form of a fixed consideration with separately stated prices for license and maintenance, a single subscription with license and maintenance bundled, or a usage-based royalty — sometimes subject to a guaranteed minimum — for the license and maintenance bundle. When the amount is in the form of a fixed consideration, including the guaranteed minimum in usage-based royalty, license revenue from distinct on-premises license is recognized at the point in time when the software or scoring solution is made available to the customer or distributor. Any royalties not subject to the guaranteed minimum or earned in excess of the minimum amount are recognized as transactional revenue when the subsequent sales or usage occurs. Revenue allocated to maintenance is generally recognized ratably over the contract period as customers simultaneously consume and receive benefits.
In addition to usage-based royalty on our software and scoring products, transactional revenue is also derived from SaaS contracts in which we provide customers with access to and standard support for our software application either in the FICO® Analytic Cloud or Amazon Web Services (“AWS”), our primary cloud infrastructure provider, on a subscription basis. The transaction price typically includes a fixed consideration in the form of a guaranteed minimum that allows up to a certain level of usage and a variable consideration in the form of usage or transaction-based fees in excess of the minimum threshold; or usage or transaction-based variable amount not subject to a minimum threshold. We determined the nature of our SaaS arrangements is to provide continuous access to our hosted application in the cloud, i.e., a stand-ready obligation that comprises a series of distinct service periods (e.g., a series of distinct daily, monthly or annual periods of service). We estimate the total variable consideration at contract inception — subject to any constraints that may apply — and update the estimates as new information becomes available and recognize the amount ratably over the SaaS service period, unless we determine it is appropriate to allocate the variable amount to each distinct service period and recognize revenue as each distinct service period is performed.
We also derive transactional revenue from credit scoring and monitoring services that provide consumers access to their credit reports and enable them to monitor their credit. These are provided as either a one-time or ongoing subscription service renewed monthly or annually, all with a fixed consideration. We determined the nature of the subscription service is a stand-ready obligation to generate credit reports, provide credit monitoring and other services for our customers, which comprises a series of distinct service periods (e.g., a series of distinct daily, monthly or annual periods of service). Revenue from one-time or monthly subscription services is recognized during the feeperiod when service is fixed or determinable and collectionperformed. Revenue from annual subscription services is probable. The determination of whether fees are fixed or determinable and collection is probable involvesrecognized ratably over the use of judgment. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenue is deferred until the arrangement fee becomes fixed or determinable, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that collectability is not probable, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when collectability becomes probable or the receipt of payment. If there is uncertainty as to the customer’s acceptance of our deliverables, revenue is not recognized until the earlier of receipt of customer acceptance, expiration of the acceptance period, or when we can demonstrate we meet the acceptance criteria. We evaluate contract terms and customer information to ensure that these criteria are met prior to our recognition of license fee revenue.subscription period.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
Professional services include software or SaaS implementation, consulting, model development, training services and premium cloud support. They are sold either standalone, or together with other products or services and generally represent distinct performance obligations. The transaction price can be a fixed amount or on a time and materials basis. Revenue on fixed-price services is recognized using an input method based on labor hours expended which we believe provides a faithful depiction of the transfer of services. Revenue on services provided on a time and materials basis is recognized applying the “right-to-invoice” practical expedient as the amount to which we have a right to invoice the customer corresponds directly with the value of our performance to the customer. In addition, we sell premium cloud support on a subscription basis for a fixed amount, and revenue is recognized ratably over the contract term.
Significant Judgments
Our contracts with customers often include promises to transfer multiple products and services to a customer. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct and should be accounted for separately may require significant judgment. Specifically, when implementation service is included in the original software or SaaS offerings, judgment is required to determine if the implementation service significantly modifies or customizes the software or SaaS service in such a way that the risks of providing it and the customization service are inseparable. In rare instances, contracts may include significant modification or customization of the software of SaaS service and will result in the combination of software or SaaS service and implementation service as one performance obligation.
We determine the SSPs using data from our historical standalone sales, or, in instances where such information is not available (such as when we do not sell the product or service separately), we consider factors such as the stated contract prices, our overall pricing practices and objectives, go-to-market strategy, size and type of the transactions, and effects of the geographic area on pricing, among others. When the selling price of a product or service is highly variable, we may use the residual methodapproach to recognize revenuedetermine the SSP of that product or service. Significant judgment may be required to determine the SSP for each distinct performance obligation when it involves the consideration of many market conditions and entity-specific factors discussed above.
Significant judgment may be required to determine the timing of satisfaction of a software arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered atperformance obligation in certain professional services contracts with a future date provided the following criteria are met: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value does not exist for one or more of the delivered items but exists for all undelivered elements, (ii) all other applicable revenue recognition criteria are met and (iii) the fair value of all of the undelivered elements is less than the arrangement fee. VSOE of fair value isfixed consideration, in which we measure progress using an input method based on the normal pricing practices for those products and services when sold separately by us and customer renewal rates for post-contract customer support services. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. If evidence of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist, the revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be established. Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for those elements, the fair value of the respective elements, and change to a product’s estimated life cycle could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned revenue.
Revenues from post-contract customer support services, such as software maintenance, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period. The majority of our software maintenance agreements provide technical support as well as unspecified software product upgrades and releases when and if made available by us during the term of the support period.
Transactional-Based Revenues
Transactional-based revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. Revenues from our credit scoring, data processing, data management and SaaS subscription services are recognized as these services are performed. Revenues from transactional or unit-based license fees under software license arrangements, credit scoring, data processing, data management and SaaS subscription services agreements are recognized based on minimum contractual amounts or on system usage that exceeds minimum contractual amounts. Certain of our transactional-based revenues are based on transaction or active account volumes as reported by our clients.labor hours expended. In instances where volumes are reported to us in arrears, we estimate volumes based on preliminary customer transaction information or average actual reported volumes for an immediate trailing period. Differences between our estimates and actual final volumes reported are recorded in the period in which actual volumes are reported. We have not experienced material variances between our estimates and actual reported volumes in the past and anticipate that we will be able to continue to make reasonable estimates in the future. If for some reason we were unable to reasonably estimate transaction volumes in the future, revenue may be deferred until actual customer data is received, and this could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Consulting Services
We provide consulting, training, model development and software integration services under both hourly-based time and materials and fixed-priced contracts. Revenues from these services are generally recognized as the services are performed. For fixed-price service contracts, we use a proportionate performance model with hours as the input method of attribution to determine progress towards completion, with consideration also given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when applicable. In such instances, management is requiredorder to estimate the total estimated hours of the project.project, we make assumptions about labor utilization, efficiency of processes, the customer’s specification and IT environment, among others. For certain complex projects, due to the risks and uncertainties inherent with the estimation process and factors relating to the assumptions, actual progress may differ due to the change in estimated total hours. Adjustments to estimates are made in the period in which the facts requiring such revisions become known and, accordingly, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Estimated losses, if any,
Capitalized Commission Costs
We capitalize incremental commission fees paid as a result of obtaining customer contracts. Capitalized commission costs, which are recorded in other assets within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, were $38.6 million and $33.7 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Capitalized commission costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over ten years — determined using a portfolio approach — based on the transfer of goods or services to which the assets relate, taking into consideration both the initial and future contracts as we do not typically pay a commission on a contract renewal. The amortization costs are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses of our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The amount of amortization was $5.7 million, $5.0 million and $4.5 million during the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was 0 impairment loss in relation to the costs capitalized.
We apply a practical expedient to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period in which current estimates of total contract revenue and contract costs indicate a loss. If substantive uncertainty related to customer acceptance of services exists, we defer the associated revenue until the contract is completed. We have not experienced material variances between our estimates and actual hours in the past and anticipateassets that we will be able to continue to make reasonable estimates in the future. Ifotherwise would have recognized is one year or less. These costs are recorded within selling, general, and administrative expenses.
See Note 15 for some reason we are unable to accurately estimate the input measures, revenue would be deferred until theour discussion on disaggregation of revenues, and Note 16 for contract is complete,balances and this could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.performance obligations.
Services that are sold in connection with software license arrangements generally qualify for separate accounting from the license element because they do not involve significant production, modification or customization of our products and are not otherwise considered to be essential to the functionality of our software. In arrangements where the professional services do not qualify for separate accounting from the license element, the combined software license and professional services revenue are recognized based on contract accounting using either the percentage-of-completion or completed-contract method.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements including Non-Software
When we enter into a multiple-deliverable arrangement that includes non-software, each deliverable is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting if the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis and (ii) for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We consider a deliverable to have standalone value if we sell this item separately or if the item is sold by another vendor or could be resold by the customer; for example, we conclude professional services offered along with our SaaS subscription services typically have standalone value using this criteria. Further, our revenue arrangements generally do not include a general right of return relative to delivered products. Revenue for multiple element arrangements is allocated to the software and non-software deliverables based on a relative selling price. We use VSOE in our allocation of arrangement consideration when it is available. We define VSOE as a median price of recent standalone transactions that are priced within a narrow range, as defined by us. If a product or service is seldom sold separately, it is unlikely that we can determine VSOE. In circumstances when VSOE does not exist, we then assess whether we can obtain third-party evidence (“TPE”) of the selling price. It may be difficult for us to obtain sufficient information on competitor pricing to substantiate TPE and therefore we may not always be able to use TPE. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated selling price (“ESP”) in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact if the product or service were sold by us on a standalone basis. Our determination of ESP involves weighting several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. The factors include, but are not limited to, geographies, market conditions, gross margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product lifecycle.
If a deliverable does not have standalone value because the aforementioned criteria are not met, we combine it with the other applicable undelivered item(s) within the arrangement and account for the multiple deliverables as one combined unit of accounting. For example, for hosting arrangements requiring a highly specialized and unique set of initial implementation and setup services prior to the commencement of hosting services, we typically conclude that these implementation or setup services do not have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis; therefore, we combine them with the hosting services as a combined unit of accounting. Revenue is recognized upon commencement of our hosting services over the expected life of the customer relationship.
Gross vs. Net Revenue Reporting
We apply accounting guidance to determine whether we report revenue for certain transactions based upon the gross amount billed to the customer, or the net amount retained by us. In accordance with the guidance we record revenue on a gross basis for sales in which we have acted as the principal and on a net basis for those sales in which we have in substance acted as an agent or broker in the transaction.
Business Combinations
Accounting for our acquisitions requires us to recognize, separately from goodwill, the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition-date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred and the net of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Accounting for business combinations requires our management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including our estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed, pre-acquisition contingencies and contingent consideration, where applicable. If we cannot reasonably determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) by the end of the measurement period, we will recognize an asset or a liability for such pre-acquisition contingency if: (i) it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Subsequent to the measurement period, changes in our estimates of such contingencies will affect earnings and could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include but are not limited to: (i) future expected cash flows from software license sales, support agreements, consulting contracts, other customer contracts and acquired developed technologies and patents; (ii) expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed; and (iii) the acquired company’s brand and competitive position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand will continue to be used in the combined company’s product portfolio. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We reevaluate these items quarterly based upon facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date with any adjustments to our preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill provided that we are within the measurement period. Subsequent to the measurement period or our final determination of the tax allowance’s or contingency’s estimated value, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances will affect our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Income Taxes
We estimate our income taxes based on the various jurisdictions where we conduct business, which involves significant judgment in determining our income tax provision. We estimate our current tax liability using currently enacted tax rates and laws and assess temporary differences that result from differing treatments of certain items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheetsheets using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will apply to taxable income for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. We then assess the likelihood our deferred tax assets will be realized and to the extent we believe realization is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance. When we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in an accounting period, we record a corresponding income tax expense in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. In assessing the need for the valuation allowance, we consider future taxable income in the jurisdictions we operate; our ability to carry back tax attributes to prior years; an analysis of our deferred tax assets and the periods over which they will be realizable; and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. An increase in the valuation allowance would have an adverse impact, which could be material, on our income tax provision and net income in the period in which we record the increase.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
We recognize and measure benefits for uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the technical merits of the tax position indicate it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. For tax positions more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions and they are evaluated on a quarterly basis. Our evaluations are based upon a number of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of audits and effective settlement of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in our income tax expense in the period in which we make the change, which could have a material impact on our effective tax rate and operating results.
A description of our accounting policies associated with tax-related contingencies and valuation allowances assumed as part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period under measurement. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and potential common shares. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options or other potentially dilutive equity instruments, when they are dilutive under the treasury stock method.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is the change in our equity (net assets) during each period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. It includes net income, foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on our investments in marketable securities, net of tax.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Foreign Currency and Derivative Financial Instruments
We have determined that the functional currency of each foreign operation is the local currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in their local foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of consolidated stockholders’ equity.
We utilize derivative instruments to manage market risks associated with fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates as they relate to specific balances of accounts receivable and cash denominated in foreign currencies. We principally utilize foreign currency forward contracts to protect against market risks arising in the normal course of business. Our policies prohibit the use of derivative instruments for the sole purpose of trading for profit on price fluctuations or to enter into contracts that intentionally increase our underlying exposure. All of our foreign currency forward contracts have maturity periods of less than three months.
At the end of the reporting period, foreign-currency-denominated assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currencies of the reporting entities at current market rates. The change in value from this remeasurement is reported as a foreign exchange gain or loss for that period in other income, (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
We recorded transactional foreign exchange gains (losses)losses of $(1.1)$1.0 million, $0.2$0.0 million and $22,000$0.4 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize it as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting or service period, as applicable, of the stock award (generally three to four years). See Note 1413 for further discussion of our share-based employee benefit plans.
Advertising and Promotion Costs
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Advertising and promotion costs totaled $3.1$8.7 million, $3.6 million and $3.7$4.1 million in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective October 1,In February 2016, the FASB issued Topic 842, which requires the recognition of operating lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. Under the new standard, disclosures are required to enable users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we early adopted ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ImprovementsTopic 842 using the “Comparatives Under 840 Option” approach to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects oftransition. In accordance with the standard, the comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences,those periods. Topic 842 provided a package of practical expedients that allow an entity to not reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts contain a lease, (2) the lease classification of awards as either equityany expired or liabilities,existing lease, and classification on the statement of cash flows. As a result of the adoption, we recognized $24.7 million of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments in our provision(3) initial direct costs for income taxes during fiscal 2017. These items were historically recorded as additional paid-in capital.any existing leases. We elected to apply the change retrospectivelypackage of practical expedients, and did not elect the hindsight practical expedient in presentationdetermining the lease term for existing leases as of October 1, 2019.
Adoption of Topic 842 did not result in the recognition of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The most significant impact of adoption was the recognition of operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities of $89.8 million and $98.9 million, respectively, while our accounting for existing capital leases (now referred to as finance leases) remained substantially unchanged. We expect the impact of adoption to be immaterial to our consolidated statements of cash flowsincome and no longer classify the excess tax benefits from employee stock plans as a reduction from operating cash flows, which resulted in increases to both net cash provided by operating activitiescomprehensive income and net cash used in financing activities of $25.0 million and $13.8 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our adoption of ASU 2016-09 also impacted the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares under the treasury stock method as we no longer increase or decrease the assumed proceeds from the vesting of, or an employee exercising, a share-based payment award by the amount of excess tax benefits or deficiencies taken to additional paid-in capital. During fiscal 2017, the impact was immaterial. Given our historical practice of including employee withholding taxes paid within financing activities in the statementconsolidated statements of cash flows no prior period reclassifications are required by the clarifications on classification provided by ASU 2016-09. Furthermore,an ongoing basis. As part of our adoption, we elected to continue to estimate expected forfeituresalso modified our control procedures and processes, none of employee equity awards to determine the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in each period.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016which materially affected our internal control over financial reporting. See Note 17 for additional information regarding our accounting policy for leases and 2015
Effective October 1, 2016, we retrospectively adopted ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability, other than those relating to line-of-credit arrangements, in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. As a result of the adoption, at September 30, 2017, the amount of debt issuance costs reflected as a deduction of long-term debt was $0.2 million. At September 30, 2016, the amount of debt issuance costs reclassified from other assets to a deduction of long-term debt was $0.4 million.additional disclosures.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date” (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers the effective date for ASU 2014-09 by one year. For public entities, the guidance in ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (including interim reporting periods within those periods), which means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted to the original effective date of December 15, 2016 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). In March 2016,2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08,2018-15, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net)Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Internal-Use Software.” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue recognition standard. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”), which reduces the complexity when applying the guidance for identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of the license implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”), which amends the guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. In December 2016, the FASB further issued ASU 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2016-20”), which makes minor corrections or minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. The amendments are intended to address implementation issues that were raised by stakeholders and provide additional practical expedients to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the new revenue standard. These amendments have the same effective date as the new revenue standard.
We have established a cross-functional implementation team consisting of representatives across the organization to address the scope of work required to implement the recognition and disclosure requirements under the new standard. This cross-functional implementation team has developed a project plan, including evaluating customer contracts across the organization, developing policies, processes and tools to report financial results, and implementing and evaluating our internal controls over financial reporting that will be necessary under the new standard. We currently plan to adopt Topic 606 in the first quarter of our fiscal 2019 using the retrospective transition method. Our ability to adopt using the full retrospective method is dependent on system readiness, and the completion of our analysis of information necessary to restate prior period financial statements. As we continue to assess the new standard along with industry trends and additional interpretive guidance, we may adjust our implementation plan accordingly.
We are continuing to assess the impact of adopting Top 606 on our consolidated financial statements and believe the new standard will impact the following policies and disclosures:
Timing of revenue recognition of license revenue on term licenses and transactional revenue on guaranteed minimum fees related to our on-premises software products. Under the new standard, we expect to recognize revenue when control of the license is transferred to the customer, rather than at the date payments become due and payable, or ratably over the term of the contract required under the current standard;
Presentation of contract balances. Under the new standard, when we enter into noncancellable contracts that provide unconditional rights to payment from our customers for services that we have not yet completed providing or services we will provide in the near future, we expect to present the unconditional rights as receivables, regardless of whether cash has been received from customers;
Required disclosures including information about remaining transaction price and when we expect to recognize revenue; and
Accounting for commissions under the new standard will result in the deferral of incremental commission costs for obtaining contracts.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
We do not currently expect Topic 606 to have a significant effect on the timing of revenue recognition for our maintenance or professional services revenues, or SaaS contracts.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”(“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. ASU 2016-16 should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings at the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued. We do not believe that adoption of ASU 2016-16 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize the expenses on their income statementsincurred in a manner similarcloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to current practice. ASU 2016-02 states that a lessee would recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-to-use asset for the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019, which means that it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2020. We do not believe that adoption of ASU 2018-15 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 (collectively, “Topic 326”). Topic 326 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, which means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2019. Early2020. We do not believe that adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing of our adoption and the impact that the updated standardTopic 326 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We do not expect that any other recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a significant effect on our financial statements.
2. Business Combinations
There were no0 acquisitions incurred during fiscal 2017.2020.
In fiscal 2016,2019, we acquired 100% of the equity of QuadMetricseZmCom, Inc. for $5.7$18.6 million in cash. We recorded $2.0$6.0 million of intangible assets which are being amortized using the straight-line method over a weighted averageweighted-average useful life of approximately 4.0 years4.73 years. We allocated $3.9$11.2 million of goodwill to our Applications segment that was notis deductible for tax purposes.
InThere were 0 acquisitions incurred during fiscal 2015, we acquired 100% of the equity of TONBELLER for $59.6 million in cash. We recorded $14.9 million of intangible assets, which are being amortized using the straight-line method over a weighted average useful life of approximately 4.9 years. The goodwill of $46.1 million was allocated to our Applications segment and was not deductible for tax purposes.2018.
3. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale
The following is a summary of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale at September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2016 |
| | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash | $ | 90,323 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 90,323 |
| | $ | 75,486 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 75,486 |
|
| Money market funds | 6,471 |
| | — |
| | 6,471 |
| | 440 |
| | — |
| | 440 |
|
| Bank time deposits | 8,824 |
| | — |
| | 8,824 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 105,618 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 105,618 |
| | $ | 75,926 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 75,926 |
|
| Long-term Marketable Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Marketable equity securities | $ | 10,788 |
| | $ | 3,003 |
| | $ | 13,791 |
| | $ | 9,598 |
| | $ | 1,418 |
| | $ | 11,016 |
|
The long-term marketable equity securities represent securities held under a supplemental retirement and savings plan for senior management employees, which are distributed upon termination or retirement of the employees.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
3. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
The following is a summary of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at September 30, 2020 and 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents: | | | | | | | |
| Cash | $ | 122,119 |
| | $ | 122,119 |
| | $ | 77,525 |
| | $ | 77,525 |
|
| Money market funds | 35,275 |
| | 35,275 |
| | 22,102 |
| | 22,102 |
|
| Bank time deposits | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 6,799 |
| | 6,799 |
|
| Total | $ | 157,394 |
| | $ | 157,394 |
| | $ | 106,426 |
| | $ | 106,426 |
|
| Long-term Marketable Securities: | | | | | | | |
| Marketable securities | $ | 20,195 |
| | $ | 25,513 |
| | $ | 17,193 |
| | $ | 20,222 |
|
The assets included in marketable securities represent long-term marketable equity securities held under a supplemental retirement and savings plan for certain officers and senior management employees, which are distributed upon termination or retirement of the employees. These investments are treated as trading securities and recorded at fair value.
4. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The accounting guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure that is based on the extent and level of judgment used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities.
Level 1 — uses unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 assets are comprised of money market funds and certain equitymarketable securities. We did not have any liabilities that are valued using inputs identified under a Level 1 hierarchy as of September 30, 2020 and 2019.
Level 2 — uses inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable through correlation with market data. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs to valuation models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment because the inputs used in the model, such as interest rates and volatility, can be corroborated by readily observable market data. We dodid not have any assets that are valued using inputs identified under a Level 2 hierarchy as of September 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019. We measure the fair value of the Senior Notes based on Level 2 inputs, which include quoted market prices and interest rate spreads of similar securities.
Level 3 — uses one or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management judgment. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, and significant management judgment or estimation. We dodid not have any assets or liabilities that are valued using inputs identified under a Level 3 hierarchy as of September 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
The following table represents financial assets that we measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
| | | September 30, 2017 | Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2017 | |
| September 30, 2020 | | Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2020 |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash equivalents (1) | $ | 15,295 |
| | $ | 15,295 |
| $ | 35,275 |
| | $ | 35,275 |
|
| Marketable securities (2) | 13,791 |
| | 13,791 |
| 25,513 |
| | 25,513 |
|
| Total | $ | 29,086 |
| | $ | 29,086 |
| $ | 60,788 |
| | $ | 60,788 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2019 | Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Assets: | | | |
| Cash equivalents (1) | $ | 28,901 |
| | $ | 28,901 |
|
| Marketable securities (2) | 20,222 |
| | 20,222 |
|
| Total | $ | 49,123 |
| | $ | 49,123 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2016 | Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Assets: | | | |
| Cash equivalents (1) | $ | 440 |
| | $ | 440 |
|
| Marketable securities (2) | 11,016 |
| | 11,016 |
|
| Total | $ | 11,456 |
| | $ | 11,456 |
|
| |
| (1) | Included in cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheetsheets at September 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019. Not included in this table are cash deposits of $90.3$122.1 million and $75.5$77.5 million at September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. |
| |
| (2) | Represents securities held under a supplemental retirement and savings plan for certain officers and senior management employees, which are distributed upon termination or retirement of the employees. Included in long-term marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheetsheets at September 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019. |
Where applicable, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to determine fair value. This pricing applies to our Level 1 investments. To the extent quoted prices in active markets for assets or liabilities are not available, the valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our financial assets incorporate market inputs, which include reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark yields, issuer spreads, benchmark securities and other inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. This methodology would apply to our Level 2 investments. We have not changed our valuation techniques in measuring the fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the period.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
For the fair value of our derivative instruments and senior notes, see Note 5 and Note 10,9, respectively.
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 or 2018.
5. Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage risks caused by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The primary objective of our derivative instruments is to protect the value of foreign-currency-denominated receivable and cash balances from the effects of volatility in foreign exchange rates that might occur prior to conversion to their functional currencies. We principally utilize foreign currency forward contracts, which enable us to buy and sell foreign currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates and economically offset changes in foreign exchange rates. We routinely enter into contracts to offset exposures denominated in the British pound, Euro and Euro.Singapore dollar.
Foreign-currency-denominated receivable and cash balances are remeasured at foreign exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet date with the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates reported in other income, (expense), net. The forward contracts are not designated as hedges and are marked to market through other income, (expense), net. Fair value changes in the forward contracts help mitigate the changes in the value of the remeasured receivable and cash balances attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The forward contracts are short-term in nature and typically have average maturities at inception of less than three months.
The following tables summarize our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts, by currency, at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
| | | | September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2020 |
| | Contract Amount | | Fair Value | Contract Amount | | Fair Value |
| | Foreign Currency | | US$ | | US$ | Foreign Currency | | USD | | USD |
| | | (In thousands) | | (In thousands) |
| Sell foreign currency: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Euro (EUR) | EUR | 5,050 |
| | $ | 5,968 |
| | — |
| EUR | 15,000 |
| | $ | 17,656 |
| | 0 |
|
| Buy foreign currency: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| British pound (GBP) | GBP | 9,341 |
| | $ | 12,500 |
| | — |
| GBP | 16,555 |
| | $ | 21,300 |
| | 0 |
|
| Singapore dollar (SGD) | | SGD | 7,815 |
| | $ | 5,700 |
| | 0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2019 |
| | Contract Amount | | Fair Value |
| | Foreign Currency | | USD | | USD |
| | | (In thousands) |
| Sell foreign currency: | | | | | | |
| Euro (EUR) | EUR | 10,800 |
| | $ | 11,723 |
| | 0 |
|
| Buy foreign currency: | | | | | | |
| British pound (GBP) | GBP | 5,200 |
| | $ | 6,400 |
| | 0 |
|
| Singapore dollar (SGD) | SGD | 5,798 |
| | $ | 4,200 |
| | 0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2016 |
| | Contract Amount | | Fair Value |
| | Foreign Currency | | US$ | | US$ |
| | | (In thousands) |
| Sell foreign currency: | | | | | | |
| Euro (EUR) | EUR | 7,850 |
| | $ | 8,743 |
| | — |
|
| Buy foreign currency: | | | | | | |
| British pound (GBP) | GBP | 7,721 |
| | $ | 10,000 |
| | — |
|
The foreign currency forward contracts were entered into on September 30 of each fiscal year; therefore, their fair value was $0 at September 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
Gains (losses)Losses on derivative financial instruments are recorded in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income as a component of other income, (expense), net. These amounts are shown below for the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Loss on foreign currency forward contracts | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 896 |
| | $ | 476 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts | $ | 210 |
| | $ | (2,911 | ) | | $ | (62 | ) |
6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Intangible assets that are subject to amortization consisted of the following at September 30, 2020 and 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Average Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Average Life |
| | (In thousands, except average life) |
| Completed technology | $ | 83,764 |
| | $ | (80,136 | ) | | $ | 3,628 |
| | 5 | | $ | 82,724 |
| | $ | (77,331 | ) | | $ | 5,393 |
| | 5 |
| Customer contracts and relationships | 19,332 |
| | (13,870 | ) | | 5,462 |
| | 9 | | 30,583 |
| | (22,283 | ) | | 8,300 |
| | 8 |
| Trade names | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 | | 150 |
| | (25 | ) | | 125 |
| | 1 |
| Non-compete agreements | 350 |
| | (204 | ) | | 146 |
| | 2 | | 350 |
| | (29 | ) | | 321 |
| | 2 |
| | $ | 103,446 |
| | $ | (94,210 | ) | | $ | 9,236 |
| | | | $ | 113,807 |
| | $ | (99,668 | ) | | $ | 14,139 |
| | |
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
6. Receivables
Receivables at September 30, 2017 and 2016 consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Billed | $ | 126,887 |
| | $ | 124,731 |
|
| Unbilled (1) | 44,640 |
| | 45,247 |
|
| | 171,527 |
| | 169,978 |
|
| Less: allowance for doubtful accounts | (2,941 | ) | | (2,192 | ) |
| Receivables, net | $ | 168,586 |
| | $ | 167,786 |
|
| |
(1) | Represents revenue recorded in excess of amounts billable pursuant to contract provisions and generally become billable at contractually specified dates or upon the attainment of milestones. Unbilled amounts are expected to be realized within one year. |
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 2,192 |
| | $ | 2,126 |
|
| Add: expense | 1,640 |
| | 2,011 |
|
| Less: write-offs (net of recoveries) | (891 | ) | | (1,945 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 2,941 |
| | $ | 2,192 |
|
7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Intangible assets that are subject to amortization consisted of the following at September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2016 |
| | (In thousands, except average life) |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Average Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Average Life |
| Completed technology | $ | 84,955 |
| | $ | (77,682 | ) | | $ | 7,273 |
| | 5 | | $ | 84,184 |
| | $ | (70,368 | ) | | $ | 13,816 |
| | 5 |
| Customer contracts and relationships | 28,947 |
| | (15,091 | ) | | 13,856 |
| | 8 | | 64,592 |
| | (45,034 | ) | | 19,558 |
| | 12 |
| Trade names | 603 |
| | (547 | ) | | 56 |
| | 3 | | 575 |
| | (330 | ) | | 245 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 114,505 |
| | $ | (93,320 | ) | | $ | 21,185 |
| | 6 | | $ | 149,351 |
| | $ | (115,732 | ) | | $ | 33,619 |
| | 8 |
Amortization expense associated with our intangible assets which has beenis reflected as a separate operating expense captioncaption—amortization of intangible assets—and is excluded from cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses within the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,income. Amortization expense consisted of the following during fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015:following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Completed technology | $ | 1,766 |
| | $ | 1,974 |
| | $ | 2,380 |
|
| Customer contracts and relationships | 2,927 |
| | 4,098 |
| | 4,214 |
|
| Trade names | 125 |
| | 25 |
| | 0 |
|
| Non-compete agreements | 175 |
| | 29 |
| | 0 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,993 |
| | $ | 6,126 |
| | $ | 6,594 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cost of revenues | $ | 6,511 |
| | $ | 7,300 |
| | $ | 7,594 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 6,198 |
| | 6,682 |
| | 6,079 |
|
| Total | $ | 12,709 |
| | $ | 13,982 |
| | $ | 13,673 |
|
In the table above, cost of revenues reflects our amortization of completed technology, and selling, general and administrative expenses reflect our amortization of other intangible assets.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Estimated future intangible asset amortization expense associated with intangible assets existing at September 30, 2017,2020, was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| Year Ending September 30, | |
| 2021 | $ | 3,646 |
|
| 2022 | 3,356 |
|
| 2023 | 1,317 |
|
| 2024 | 917 |
|
| 2025 | 0 |
|
| Thereafter | 0 |
|
| Total | $ | 9,236 |
|
|
| | | |
| Year Ended September 30, | |
| 2018 | $ | 6,555 |
|
| 2019 | 6,037 |
|
| 2020 | 3,670 |
|
| 2021 | 2,426 |
|
| 2022 | 2,280 |
|
| Thereafter | 217 |
|
| Total | $ | 21,185 |
|
The following table summarizes changes to goodwill during fiscal 20172020 and 2016,2019, both in total and as allocated to our operating segments. We have not recognized any goodwill impairment losses to date.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance at September 30, 2018 | $ | 585,161 |
| | $ | 146,648 |
| | $ | 69,081 |
| | $ | 800,890 |
|
| Addition from acquisitions | 11,233 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 11,233 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (7,780 | ) | | 0 |
| | (801 | ) | | (8,581 | ) |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | 588,614 |
| | 146,648 |
| | 68,280 |
| | 803,542 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 8,190 |
| | 0 |
| | 632 |
| | 8,822 |
|
| Balance at September 30, 2020 | $ | 596,804 |
| | $ | 146,648 |
| | $ | 68,912 |
| | $ | 812,364 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance at September 30, 2015 | $ | 596,765 |
| | $ | 146,648 |
| | $ | 71,337 |
| | $ | 814,750 |
|
| Addition from acquisitions | 3,857 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,857 |
|
| Adjustment related to prior acquisitions | 283 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 283 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (18,185 | ) | | — |
| | (2,290 | ) | | (20,475 | ) |
| Balance at September 30, 2016 | 582,720 |
| | 146,648 |
| | 69,047 |
| | 798,415 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 5,568 |
| | — |
| | 431 |
| | 5,999 |
|
| Balance at September 30, 2017 | $ | 588,288 |
| | $ | 146,648 |
| | $ | 69,478 |
| | $ | 804,414 |
|
8. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
The following table presents the composition of property and equipment at September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Property and equipment: | | | |
| Data processing equipment and software | $ | 88,830 |
| | $ | 84,761 |
|
| Office furniture and equipment | 20,763 |
| | 16,847 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 25,767 |
| | 25,152 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (94,657 | ) | | (81,638 | ) |
| Total | $ | 40,703 |
| | $ | 45,122 |
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
9.
7. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
The following table presents the composition of property and equipment, net and other assets at September 30, 2020 and 2019:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Property and equipment: | | | |
| Data processing equipment and software | $ | 108,913 |
| | $ | 110,874 |
|
| Office furniture and equipment | 20,478 |
| | 21,443 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 25,239 |
| | 33,360 |
|
| Equipment under capital lease | 6,489 |
| | 6,398 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (114,700 | ) | | (119,048 | ) |
| Total | $ | 46,419 |
| | $ | 53,027 |
|
| | | | |
| Other assets: | | | |
| Long-term receivables | $ | 54,074 |
| | $ | 34,370 |
|
| Prepaid commissions | 38,579 |
| | 33,700 |
|
| Others | 12,632 |
| | 11,093 |
|
| Total | $ | 105,285 |
| | $ | 79,163 |
|
As a strategic cost initiative in fiscal 2020 we committed to a course of action to adjust our facilities footprint in light of post-pandemic workforce patterns. As a result of this initiative, we recorded a net impairment loss of $5.2 million on abandonment of property and equipment. See Note 11 for additional information regarding our restructuring and impairment charges.
8. Revolving Line of Credit
In June 2017,On May 8, 2018, we amended our credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, increasing our borrowing capacity underextending the maturity date of the unsecured revolving line of credit from December 30, 2019 to $500May 8, 2023, while reducing our borrowing capacity to $400 million with an option to increase it by another $100 million. The revolving line of credit expires on December 30, 2019. Proceeds from the credit facility can be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and may also be used for the refinancing of existing debt, acquisitions, and the repurchase of our common stock. Interest on amounts borrowed under the credit facility is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.500% and (c) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.000%, plus, in each case, an applicable margin, or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate borrowings ranges from 0% to 0.875% and for LIBOR borrowings ranges from 1.000% to 1.875% and is determined based on our consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, we must pay credit facility fees. The credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants including maintaining a minimum fixed charge ratio of 2.5 and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.0,3.25, subject to a step up to 3.53.75 following certain permitted acquisitions.acquisitions; and a minimum fixed charge ratio of 2.50 through the maturity of our 2010 Senior Notes in July 2020, following which maintaining a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.00 is required. The credit agreement also contains other covenants typical of unsecured facilities. As of September 30, 2017,2020, we had $361.0$95.0 million in borrowings outstanding at a weighted averageweighted-average interest rate of 2.365%, of which $350.0 million was classified as a long-term liability1.285% and recorded in long-term debt within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Wewe were in compliance with all financial covenants under this credit facility as of September 30, 2017.facility.
10.9. Senior Notes
On May 7, 2008, we issued $275 million of senior notes in a private placement to a group of institutional investors (the “2008 Senior Notes”). The 2008 Senior Notes were issued in four series as follows: |
| | | | | | |
| Series | Amount | Interest Rate | Maturity Date |
| | (In millions) | | |
| A | $ | 41.0 |
| 6.37 | % | May 7, 2013 |
| B | $ | 40.0 |
| 6.37 | % | May 7, 2015 |
| C | $ | 63.0 |
| 6.71 | % | May 7, 2015 |
| D | $ | 131.0 |
| 7.18 | % | May 7, 2018 |
On July 14, 2010, we issued $245 million of senior notes in a private placement to a group of institutional investors (the “2010 Senior Notes” and, with the 2008 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”). The 2010 Senior Notes were issued in four4 series as follows:
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
|
| | | | | | |
| Series | Amount | Interest Rate | Maturity Date |
| | (In millions) | | |
| E | $ | 60.0 |
| 4.72 | % | July 14, 2016 |
| F | $ | 72.0 |
| 5.04 | % | July 14, 2017 |
| G | $ | 28.0 |
| 5.42 | % | July 14, 2019 |
| H | $ | 85.0 |
| 5.59 | % | July 14, 2020 |
We |
| | | | | | |
| Series | Amount | Interest Rate | Maturity Date |
| | (In millions) | | |
| E | $ | 60.0 |
| 4.72 | % | July 14, 2016 |
| F | $ | 72.0 |
| 5.04 | % | July 14, 2017 |
| G | $ | 28.0 |
| 5.42 | % | July 14, 2019 |
| H | $ | 85.0 |
| 5.59 | % | July 14, 2020 |
On July 14, 2020, the aggregate principal amount of Series H of 2010 Senior Notes was repaid at maturity. At September 30, 2020, the 2010 Senior Notes were and are requiredno longer outstanding.
On May 8, 2018, we issued $400 million of senior notes in a private offering to pay the entire unpaid principal balances of each note series on its maturity date except for Series B notes, which required annual principal payments of $8.0 million starting on May 7, 2011 and ending on May 7, 2015.qualified institutional investors (the “2018 Senior Notes”). The 2018 Senior Notes require interest payments semi-annually at a rate of 5.25% per annum and contain certain restrictive covenants, includingwill mature on May 15, 2026.
On December 6, 2019, we issued $350 million of senior notes in a private offering to qualified institutional investors (the “2019 Senior Notes,” along with the maintenance2010 Senior Notes and 2018 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”). We used the net proceeds to repay a large portion of consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA ratiothe outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility. The 2019 Senior Notes require interest payments semi-annually at a rate of 4.00% per annum and a fixed charge coverage ratio. will mature on June 15, 2028.
The purchase agreementsindentures for the 2018 Senior Notes alsoand the 2019 Senior Notes contain certain covenants typical of unsecured facilities. As of September 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.obligations.
The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values for the Senior Notes at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:
2019:
67 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2020 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| | Face Value (*) |
| Fair Value |
| Face Value (*) |
| Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) |
| The 2010 Senior Notes | $ | 0 |
|
| $ | 0 |
|
| $ | 85,000 |
|
| $ | 86,121 |
|
| The 2018 Senior Notes | 400,000 |
| | 442,000 |
| | 400,000 |
| | 428,000 |
|
| The 2019 Senior Notes | 350,000 |
| | 358,750 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
|
| Total | $ | 750,000 |
| | $ | 800,750 |
| | $ | 485,000 |
| | $ | 514,121 |
|
(*) The carrying value of the Senior Notes was reduced by the net debt issuance costs of $10.6 million and $5.2 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Future principal payments for the Senior Notes are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| Year Ending September 30, | |
| 2021 | $ | 0 |
|
| 2022 | 0 |
|
| 2023 | 0 |
|
| 2024 | 0 |
|
| 2025 | 0 |
|
| Thereafter | 750,000 |
|
| Total | $ | 750,000 |
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 |
| September 30, 2016 |
| | Carrying
Amounts |
| Fair Value |
| Carrying
Amounts (1) |
| Fair Value (1) |
| | (In thousands) |
| The 2008 Senior Notes | $ | 131,000 |
|
| $ | 134,250 |
|
| $ | 131,000 |
|
| $ | 139,902 |
|
| The 2010 Senior Notes | 113,000 |
|
| 119,106 |
|
| 185,000 |
|
| 195,715 |
|
| Debt issuance costs | (199 | ) | | (199 | ) | | (376 | ) | | (376 | ) |
| Total | $ | 243,801 |
| | $ | 253,157 |
| | $ | 315,624 |
| | $ | 335,241 |
|
(1) Balances as of September 30, 2016 have been recast as a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to present debt issuance costs of $0.4 million as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the Senior Notes.
We measure the fair value of the Senior Notes based on Level 2 inputs, which include quoted market prices and interest rate spreads of similar securities.
Future principal payments for the Senior Notes are as follows (in thousands): |
| | | |
| Year Ended September 30, | |
| 2018 | $ | 131,000 |
|
| 2019 | 28,000 |
|
| 2020 | 85,000 |
|
| Total | $ | 244,000 |
|
11.10. Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Plans
We sponsor the Fair Isaac Corporation 401(k) plan for eligible employees in the U.S. Under this plan, eligible employees may contribute up to 25% of compensation, not to exceed statutory limits. We also provide a company matching contribution. Investment in FICO common stock is not an option under this plan. Our contributions into all 401(k) plans, including former acquired company sponsoredformer-acquired-company-sponsored plans that have since merged into the Fair Isaac Corporation 401(k) plan or have been frozen, totaled $8.4$10.1 million, $7.3$10.3 million and $7.1$8.8 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Employee Incentive Plans
We maintain various employee incentive plans for the benefit of eligible employees, including officers. The awards generally are based on the achievement of certain financial and performance objectives subject to the discretion of management. Total expenses under our employee incentive plans were $41.6$60.6 million, $40.0$57.5 million and $20.3$48.4 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
12.11. Restructuring Expensesand Impairment Charges
During fiscal 2017,2020, we incurred net charges totaling $4.5$45.0 million consisting of $1.7of$28.0 million in facilities chargesimpairment loss on operating lease assets, $5.2 million in impairment loss on disposals of property and equipment and $11.8 million in restructuring charges. The impairment losses were associated with vacating excess leasedclosing certain non-core offices and reducing office space in San Rafael, California and $2.8 millionother locations to better align with anticipated needs in severancelight of post-pandemic workforce patterns. The restructuring charges duerelated to the eliminationemployee separation costs as a result of 79eliminating 209 positions throughout the Company. Cash payments for all the facilities charges will be paid by the end of fiscal 2020. Cash payments for all the employee separation costs will be paid by the end of the second quarter ofour fiscal 2018.2021.
There was nowere 0 restructuring expenseand impairment charges incurred during fiscal 2016.
During fiscal 2015, we incurred net charges totaling $17.5 million consisting of $13.6 million in facilities charges associated with vacating excess leased space in Roseville, Minnesota2019 and San Rafael, California, and $3.9 million in severance charges due to the elimination of 97 positions throughout the Company. Cash payments for all the facilities charges will be paid by the end of fiscal 2020. Cash payments for all the severance costs were paid by the end of fiscal 2016.2018.
The following tables summarize our restructuring accruals associated with the aboveemployee separation actions. The current portion and non-current portion waswere recorded in other accrued liabilities and other liabilities, respectively, within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Accrual at September 30, 2018 | | Expense Additions | | Cash Payments | | Accrual Adjustments | | Accrual at September 30, 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Facilities charges | $ | 5,228 |
| | $ | 0 |
| | $ | (3,850 | ) | | $ | 0 |
| | $ | 1,378 |
|
| Less: current portion | (3,850 | ) | | | | | | | | (1,378 | ) |
| Non-current | $ | 1,378 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 0 |
|
68 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Accrual at September 30, 2019 | | Expense Additions | | Cash Payments | | Accrual Adjustments (*) | | Accrual at September 30, 2020 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Facilities charges | $ | 1,378 |
| | $ | 0 |
| | $ | 0 |
| | $ | (1,378 | ) | | $ | 0 |
|
| Employee separation | 0 |
| | 11,768 |
| | (3,577 | ) | | 0 |
| | 8,191 |
|
| | 1,378 |
| | $ | 11,768 |
| | $ | (3,577 | ) | | $ | (1,378 | ) | | 8,191 |
|
| Less: current portion | (1,378 | ) | | | | | | | | (8,191 | ) |
| Non-current | $ | 0 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 0 |
|
(*) Upon adoption of Topic 842, accrued lease exit obligations of $1.4 million, which were associated with vacating excess leased space in fiscal 2017, were reclassified to operating lease liabilities.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Accrual at September 30, 2015 | | Expense Additions | | Cash Payments | | Accrual at September 30, 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Facilities charges | $ | 12,995 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,762 | ) | | $ | 9,233 |
|
| Employee separation | 2,405 |
| | — |
| | (2,405 | ) | | — |
|
| | 15,400 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (6,167 | ) | | 9,233 |
|
| Less: current portion | (5,570 | ) | | | | | | (4,266 | ) |
| Non-current | $ | 9,830 |
| | | | | | $ | 4,967 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Accrual at September 30, 2016 | | Expense Additions | | Cash Payments | | Accrual at September 30, 2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Facilities charges | $ | 9,233 |
| | $ | 1,729 |
| | $ | (2,842 | ) | | $ | 8,120 |
|
| Employee separation | — |
| | 2,742 |
| | (2,557 | ) | | 185 |
|
| | 9,233 |
| | $ | 4,471 |
| | $ | (5,399 | ) | | 8,305 |
|
| Less: current portion | (4,266 | ) | | | | | | (3,077 | ) |
| Non-current | $ | 4,967 |
| | | | | | $ | 5,228 |
|
13.12. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was as follows during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Current: | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 14,566 |
| | $ | 1,299 |
| | $ | 8,071 |
|
| State | 2,180 |
| | (423 | ) | | 2,236 |
|
| Foreign | 12,482 |
| | 15,371 |
| | 9,559 |
|
| | 29,228 |
| | 16,247 |
| | 19,866 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | |
| Federal | (8,575 | ) | | 7,003 |
| | 13,987 |
|
| State | (957 | ) | | 947 |
| | 132 |
|
| Foreign | 893 |
| | (249 | ) | | (3,535 | ) |
| | (8,639 | ) | | 7,701 |
| | 10,584 |
|
| Total provision | $ | 20,589 |
| | $ | 23,948 |
| | $ | 30,450 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Current: | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 19,576 |
| | $ | 50,631 |
| | $ | 23,646 |
|
| State | 1,055 |
| | 2,900 |
| | (5,381 | ) |
| Foreign | 8,486 |
| | 7,597 |
| | 10,405 |
|
| | 29,117 |
| | 61,128 |
| | 28,670 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | |
| Federal | (5,027 | ) | | (23,592 | ) | | (5,004 | ) |
| State | (296 | ) | | (225 | ) | | 1,422 |
|
| Foreign | (726 | ) | | (2,190 | ) | | (2,352 | ) |
| | (6,049 | ) | | (26,007 | ) | | (5,934 | ) |
| Total provision | $ | 23,068 |
| | $ | 35,121 |
| | $ | 22,736 |
|
The foreign provision was based on foreign pre-tax earnings of $27.8$42.2 million, $33.0$36.0 million and $45.2$10.8 million in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Current foreign tax expense related to foreign tax withholdings was $4.6$6.4 million, $6.5 million and $5.3$6.0 million in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Foreign withholding tax and related foreign tax credits are included in current tax expense above.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 20172020 and 20162019 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | |
| Loss and credit carryforwards | $ | 31,015 |
| | $ | 26,702 |
|
| Compensation benefits | 29,640 |
| | 23,931 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities | 21,827 |
| | 0 |
|
| Other assets | 9,000 |
| | 9,393 |
|
| | 91,482 |
| | 60,026 |
|
| Less: valuation allowance | (24,563 | ) | | (19,231 | ) |
| Total deferred tax assets | 66,919 |
| | 40,795 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
| Intangible assets | (14,715 | ) | | (15,114 | ) |
| Deferred commission | (9,027 | ) | | (7,920 | ) |
| Property and equipment | (3,135 | ) | | (3,511 | ) |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | (13,719 | ) | | 0 |
|
| Other liabilities | (11,694 | ) | | (8,244 | ) |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | (52,290 | ) | | (34,789 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets, net | $ | 14,629 |
| | $ | 6,006 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | |
| Net operating loss carryforward | $ | 16,765 |
| | $ | 16,122 |
|
| Foreign tax credit carryforward | 10,286 |
| | 14,590 |
|
| Research credit carryforward | 7,333 |
| | 6,132 |
|
| Accrued bonus | 14,468 |
| | 13,807 |
|
| Investments | 582 |
| | 619 |
|
| Accrued compensation | 1,585 |
| | 1,328 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 29,770 |
| | 27,203 |
|
| Deferred revenue | — |
| | 1,467 |
|
| Accrued lease costs | 3,026 |
| | 3,406 |
|
| Property and equipment | 3,476 |
| | 3,348 |
|
| Other | 8,630 |
| | 7,728 |
|
| | 95,921 |
| | 95,750 |
|
| Less valuation allowance | (17,657 | ) | | (15,145 | ) |
| Total deferred tax assets | 78,264 |
| | 80,605 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
| Intangible assets | (25,346 | ) | | (28,056 | ) |
| Prepaid expense | (4,681 | ) | | (3,959 | ) |
| Deferred revenue | (41 | ) | | — |
|
| Other | (992 | ) | | (992 | ) |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | (31,060 | ) | | (33,007 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets, net | $ | 47,204 |
| | $ | 47,598 |
|
Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods that the deferred tax assets will reverse, management believes it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets, net of the existing valuation allowance at September 30, 2017.2020.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
As of September 30, 2017,2020, we had available U.S. federal, state and foreign net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $17.1$7.6 million, $0.3$0.1 million, and $38.8$31.3 million, respectively. The U.S. federal NOLs were acquired in connection with our acquisitions of Braun in fiscal 2005, Adeptra in fiscal 2012 and Infoglide in fiscal 2013 and Quadmetrics in 2016.2013. The U.S. federal NOL carryforward will expire at various dates beginning in fiscal 2020,2024, if not utilized. The state NOL carryforward will begin to expire at various dates beginning in fiscal 2021, if not utilized. The $38.8$31.3 million of foreign NOL includes $24.2$5.5 million related to China.China and $19.5 million related to Germany. Due to a limited ability to utilize the China and Germany NOLs, a full valuation allowance has been recorded on the China and Germany NOLs, resulting in no tax benefit. Utilization of the U.S. federal and state NOLNOLs are subject to an annual limitation due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. In fiscal 2016 and 20172020 we generated approximately $4.7 million of excess foreignfederal research credits which are expected to be utilized fully in future tax credits associated with dividends received from two of our foreign subsidiaries. The associated deferred tax asset of $9.6 million can be carried forward for up to 10 years. Management believes it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of this deferred tax asset and therefore no valuation allowance has been recorded to offset the future benefit of these credits. We also have available excess California state research credit of approximately $7.3$16.6 million. The California state research credit does not have an expiration date; however, based on enacted law and expected future cash taxes, we have recorded a valuation allowance of $7.3$16.6 million.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes, with the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate (35%(21% in each of fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, and 24.5% in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015)2018) to income before provision for income taxes for fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 is shown below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Income tax provision at U.S. federal statutory rate | $ | 53,970 |
| | $ | 45,375 |
| | $ | 38,495 |
|
| State income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit | 4,619 |
| | 4,194 |
| | 2,755 |
|
| Foreign tax rate differential | 493 |
| | 839 |
| | (649 | ) |
| Research credits | (5,868 | ) | | (5,761 | ) | | (3,486 | ) |
| Domestic production deduction | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | (2,421 | ) |
| Amended returns/audit settlements/statute expirations | (1,085 | ) | | (2,268 | ) | | (2,349 | ) |
| Foreign | 7,513 |
| | 11,177 |
| | 4,040 |
|
| Valuation allowance | 5,332 |
| | (333 | ) | | 1,907 |
|
| Foreign tax credit and foreign withholding tax | 2,086 |
| | (464 | ) | | 1,320 |
|
| Excess tax benefits relating to stock-based compensation | (45,086 | ) | | (24,891 | ) | | (22,253 | ) |
| Tax effect of the Tax Act | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 16,719 |
|
| GILTI, FDII and BEAT | 5,050 |
| | 1,931 |
| | 0 |
|
| Other | (6,435 | ) | | (5,851 | ) | | (3,628 | ) |
| Recorded income tax provision | $ | 20,589 |
| | $ | 23,948 |
| | $ | 30,450 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Income tax provision at U.S. federal statutory rate | $ | 52,963 |
| | $ | 50,599 |
| | $ | 38,233 |
|
| State income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit | 2,193 |
| | 2,244 |
| | 1,719 |
|
| Foreign tax rate differential | (1,761 | ) | | (4,661 | ) | | (5,279 | ) |
| Intercompany interest | (477 | ) | | (1,223 | ) | | (1,260 | ) |
| Research credits | (2,572 | ) | | (4,398 | ) | | (2,104 | ) |
| Domestic production deduction | (3,075 | ) | | (3,726 | ) | | (1,607 | ) |
| Amended Returns/Audit Settlements/Statute Expirations | (1,296 | ) | | (248 | ) | | (5,806 | ) |
| Foreign | 744 |
| | (1,702 | ) | | (3,109 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | 2,512 |
| | 1,262 |
| | 1,805 |
|
| Foreign tax credit | (1,342 | ) | | (3,286 | ) | | (1,296 | ) |
| Excess tax benefits relating to stock-based compensation | (24,746 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | (75 | ) | | 260 |
| | 1,440 |
|
| Recorded income tax provision | $ | 23,068 |
| | $ | 35,121 |
| | $ | 22,736 |
|
The decrease in our income tax provision in fiscal 20172020 compared to fiscal 20162019 was due primarily to an increase in the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on October 1, 2016. We no longer record excess tax benefits as an increaserelated to additional paid-in capital, but record such excess tax benefits on a prospective basis as a reduction of income tax expense.stock-based compensation in fiscal 2020.
The increasedecrease in our income tax provision in fiscal 20162019 compared to fiscal 20152018 was due primarily to the favorable settlementdecrease in the overall federal tax rate from the blended 24.5% in fiscal 2018 to 21% in fiscal 2019 and the recording of several one-time items in fiscal 2018 related to the enactment of the fiscal 2006-2009 state audits and the favorable settlement of the 2010 foreign transfer pricing assessment in fiscal 2015, partially offset by an increase in the foreign tax credit associated with the repatriation of income from the United Kingdom and Brazil and the Domestic Production Activities Deduction in fiscal 2016.Tax Act.
As of September 30, 2017,2020, we have not made a provision for U.S. or additional foreign withholding taxes onhad approximately $47.0$111.7 million of the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries. We intend to reinvest theunremitted earnings of non-U.S. subsidiariessubsidiaries. The Company generates substantial cash flow in those operations indefinitely, except where we are ablethe U.S. and does not have a current need for the cash to repatriatebe returned to the U.S. from the foreign entities. In the event these earnings are later remitted to the United States without material incrementalU.S., any estimated withholding tax provision. The determination and estimation of the futurestate income tax consequences in all relevant taxing jurisdictions involvesdue upon remittance of those earnings is expected to be immaterial to the application of highly complexincome tax laws in the countries involved, particularly in the United States, and is based on our tax profile in the year of earnings repatriation. Accordingly, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax liability related to investments in these foreign subsidiaries.provision.
Unrecognized Tax Benefit for Uncertain Tax Positions
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities. With a few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, local, or foreign income tax examinations for fiscal years prior to 2014. We are currently under audit by New York City for fiscal 2011, 2012 and 2013. We do not anticipate any adjustments related to those audits that will result in a material change to our consolidated financial statements.2015.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year | $ | 5,834 |
| | $ | 6,113 |
| | $ | 6,480 |
|
| Gross increases for tax positions in prior years | 883 |
| | 509 |
| | 404 |
|
| Gross decreases for tax positions in prior years | (65 | ) | | (611 | ) | | 0 |
|
| Gross increases based on tax positions related to the current year | 2,260 |
| | 1,439 |
| | 1,625 |
|
| Decreases for settlements and payments | 0 |
| | (637 | ) | | 0 |
|
| Decreases due to statute expiration | (918 | ) | | (979 | ) | | (2,396 | ) |
| Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year | $ | 7,994 |
| | $ | 5,834 |
| | $ | 6,113 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year | $ | 6,799 |
| | $ | 4,634 |
| | $ | 4,554 |
|
| Gross increases for tax positions in prior years | 57 |
| | 1,004 |
| | 1,725 |
|
| Gross decreases for tax positions in prior years | (19 | ) | | (117 | ) | | (3 | ) |
| Gross increases based on tax positions related to the current year | 1,291 |
| | 1,310 |
| | 582 |
|
| Decreases for settlements and payments | (151 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (2,224 | ) |
| Decreases due to statue expiration | (1,497 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year | $ | 6,480 |
| | $ | 6,799 |
| | $ | 4,634 |
|
We had $6.5$8.0 million of total unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2017,2020, including $5.8$7.8 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. Although the timing and outcome of audit settlements are uncertain, it is unlikely there will be a significant reduction of the uncertain tax benefits in the next 12twelve months.
We recognize interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties as part of the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. We recognize interest earned related to income tax matters as interest income in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. As of September 30, 2017,2020, we havehad accrued interest of $0.4 million related to the unrecognized tax benefits.
14.13. Stock-Based Employee Benefit Plans
Description of Stock Option and Share Plans
We maintain the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) under which we are authorized to issue equity awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, stock unit awards and other stock-based awards. All employees, consultants and advisors of FICO or any subsidiary, as well as all non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the 2012 Plan. We also have one other long-term incentive plan under which awards are currently outstanding: the 1992 Long-term Incentive Plan, which was adopted in February 1992 and expired in February 2012. Stock option awards have a maximum term of seven years. StockIn general, stock option awards and restricted stock unit awards not subject to market or performance conditions vest ratablyannually over three or four years. Restricted stock unit awards subject to market or performance conditions generally vest annually over a period of three years based on the achievement of specified criteria. At September 30, 2017,2020, there were 4,018,3294,998,722 shares available for issuance under the 2012 Plan.
Description of Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under ourWe maintain the 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase“2019 Purchase Plan”), under which we are authorized to issue up to 5,062,5001,000,000 shares of common stock to eligible employees. Employees may have up to 10%15% of their base salaryeligible pay withheld through payroll deductions to purchase FICO common stock during semi-annual offering periods. The purchase price of the stock is 85% of the fair market valueclosing sales price on the exercise date (the last trading day of each offering period).period. Offering period means approximately six-month periods commencing (a) on the first trading day on or after JanuarySeptember 1 and terminating on the last trading day in the following June,February, and (b) on the first trading day on or after JulyMarch 1 and terminating on the last trading day in the following December. The Purchase Plan was suspended effective January 1, 2009 and employees cannot contribute to the Purchase Plan until the suspension is repealed.August. At September 30, 2017,2020, there were 2,707,966949,702 shares available for issuance.issuance under the 2019 Purchase Plan.
We satisfy stock option exercises, vesting of restricted stock units and the 2019 Purchase Plan issuances from treasury shares.
Share-Based Compensation Expense and Related Income Tax Benefits
We recorded share-based compensation expense of $61.2$93.7 million, $55.5$83.0 million and $45.3$74.8 million in fiscal years 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The total tax benefit related to this share-based compensation expense was $20.4$13.2 million, $18.7$12.5 million and $16.1$15.7 million in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. As of September 30, 2017,2020, there was $87.6$127.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under all equity compensation plans. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted averageweighted-average period of 2.342.33 years.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
In fiscal 20172020 we received $14.5$25.4 million in cash from stock option exercises, with the tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from these exercises of $9.4$30.2 million.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Stock-Based Activity
Stock Options
We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and we amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. We used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of our stock options during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Stock Options: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average expected term (years) | | | 4.46 |
| | | | 4.26 |
| |
|
| | 4.78 |
|
| Expected volatility (range) | 30.0 | - | 35.9 | % | | 31.1 | - | 32.4 | % | | 33.6 | % | - | 35.1 | % |
| Weighted-average volatility | | | 30.6 | % | | | | 32.2 | % | |
|
| | 34.6 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate (range) | 0.36 | - | 1.68 | % | | 2.50 | - | 2.68 | % | | 2.03 | % | - | 2.65 | % |
| Weighted-average expected dividend yield | | | 0 | % | | | | 0 | % | |
|
| | 0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, | |
| | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| Stock Options: | | | | | | | | |
| Average expected term (years) | 5.00 | | | 4.83 | | | 4.18 | |
| Expected volatility (range) | 35.3 | % | | 35.3 - 36.4 | % | | 34.5 - 35.3 | % |
| Weighted average volatility | 35.3 | % | | 36.0 | % | | 34.6 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate (range) | 2.02 | % | | 1.21 - 1.49 | % | | 1.33 - 1.48 | % |
| Average expected dividend yield | 0.07 | % | | 0.09 | % | | 0.14 | % |
| Expected dividend yield (range) | 0.07 | % | | 0.09 - 0.10 | % | | 0.11 - 0.14 | % |
Expected Volatility. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of grant based on a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common stock and our historical volatility rate.
Expected Term. The expected term represents the period that our stock options are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the expected term based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior.
Dividends. The We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock since May 2017, and we do not presently plan to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield assumption is based on historical dividend payouts.of zero in the years presented.
Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee options.
Forfeitures. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.
The following table summarizes option activity during fiscal 2017:2020:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- average Exercise Price | | Weighted- average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | (In thousands) | | | | (In years) | | (In thousands) |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 616 |
| | $ | 89.36 |
| | | | |
| Granted | 32 |
| | 364.23 |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (401 | ) | | 63.47 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited | (1 | ) | | 185.05 |
| | | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 246 |
| | $ | 166.80 |
| | 3.84 | | $ | 63,605 |
|
| Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | 168 |
| | $ | 130.87 |
| | 3.06 | | $ | 49,435 |
|
| Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2020 | 243 |
| | $ | 165.32 |
| | 3.82 | | $ | 63,125 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- average Exercise Price | | Weighted- average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | (In thousands) | | | | (In years) | | (In thousands) |
| Outstanding at October 1, 2016 | 1,521 |
| | $ | 52.37 |
| | | | |
| Granted | 34 |
| | 128.80 |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (325 | ) | | 44.52 |
| | | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 1,230 |
| | $ | 56.54 |
| | 3.12 | | $ | 103,275 |
|
| Exercisable at September 30, 2017 | 946 |
| | $ | 50.29 |
| | 2.74 | | $ | 85,354 |
|
| Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2017 | 1,223 |
| | $ | 56.43 |
| | 3.11 | | $ | 102,843 |
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
The weighted averageweighted-average fair value of options granted were $43.80, $31.06$99.30, $59.63 and $21.66$56.61 during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at September 30, 20172020 was calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the market price of our common stock for the 1.20.2 million outstanding shares,options, which had exercise prices lower than the $140.50$425.38 market price of our common stock at September 30, 2017.2020. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $27.0$132.6 million, $41.3$99.1 million and $24.3$41.4 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, determined as of the date of exercise.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Restricted Stock Units
The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted is the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the expected dividend yield, if applicable. We amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The following table summarizes the RSUs activity during fiscal 2017:2020:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted-average Grant-date Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 998 |
| | $ | 159.99 |
|
| Granted | 218 |
| | 356.66 |
|
| Released | (434 | ) | | 138.04 |
|
| Forfeited | (61 | ) | | 200.38 |
|
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 721 |
| | $ | 229.10 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted-average Grant-date Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Outstanding at October 1, 2016 | 1,211 |
| | $ | 76.93 |
|
| Granted | 460 |
| | 122.47 |
|
| Released | (475 | ) | | 68.54 |
|
| Forfeited | (52 | ) | | 93.80 |
|
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 1,144 |
| | $ | 97.95 |
|
The weighted averageweighted-average fair value of the RSUs granted were $122.47, $94.77$356.66, $206.29 and $73.93$161.85 during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the RSUs that vested was $58.7$159.0 million, $49.8$91.2 million and $38.5$70.7 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, determined as of the date of vesting.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units (“PSUs”) are granted to our senior officers and earned based on pre-established performance goals approved by the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors for any given performance period. The range of payout is zero0 to 200% of the number of grantedtarget PSUs, based on the outcome of the performance conditions. We estimate the fair value of the PSUs using the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the expected dividend yield if applicable, based on the performance condition that is probable of achievement. We amortize the fair values over the requisite service period for each vesting tranche of the award. We reassess the probability at each reporting period and recognize the cumulative effect of the change in estimate in the period of change.
The following table summarizes the PSUs activity during fiscal 2017:2020:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- average Grant-date Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 195 |
| | $ | 163.38 |
|
| Granted | 53 |
| | 354.18 |
|
| Released | (101 | ) | | 152.45 |
|
| Forfeited | (20 | ) | | 175.50 |
|
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 127 |
| | $ | 248.97 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- average Grant-date Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Outstanding at October 1, 2016 | 230 |
| | $ | 73.99 |
|
| Granted | 110 |
| | 121.30 |
|
| Released | (136 | ) | | 65.24 |
|
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 204 |
| | $ | 105.37 |
|
The weighted averageweighted-average fair value of the PSUs granted were $121.30, $91.74$354.18, $185.05 and $71.86$157.17 during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the PSUs that vested was $16.6$36.5 million, $14.0$19.3 million and $9.7$15.1 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, determined as of the date of vesting.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
Market Share Units
Market share units (“MSUs”) are granted to our senior officers and earned based on our total shareholderstockholder return relative to the Russell 3000 Index over performance periods of one, two and three years. We estimate the fair value of MSUs granted using the Monte Carlo valuation model and amortize the fair values over the requisite service period for each vesting tranche of the award. In addition, we do not reverse the compensation cost solely because the market condition is not satisfied, and the award is therefore not earned by the employee, provided the requisite service is rendered. We used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of our MSUs during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | 2018 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Expected volatility in FICO’s stock price | 25.2 | % | | 24.6 | % | | 24.6 | % |
| Expected volatility in Russell 3000 Index | 12.9 | % | | 12.8 | % | | 12.7 | % |
| Correlation between FICO and the Russell 3000 Index | 64.0 | % | | 66.6 | % | | 63.1 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.67 | % | | 2.73 | % | | 1.92 | % |
| Average expected dividend yield | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Expected volatility in FICO’s stock price | 27.4 | % | | 24.1 | % | | 26.6 | % |
| Expected volatility in Russell 3000 Index | 13.6 | % | | 12.8 | % | | 12.2 | % |
| Correlation between FICO and the Russell 3000 Index | 59.8 | % | | 60.2 | % | | 55.9 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.40 | % | | 1.25 | % | | 1.10 | % |
| Average expected dividend yield | 0.07 | % | | 0.09 | % | | 0.14 | % |
The expected volatility was determined based on daily historical movements in our stock price and the Russell 3000 Index for the three years preceding the grant date. The correlation between FICO and the Russell 3000 Index was determined based on historical daily stock price movements for the three years preceding the grant date. TheBecause we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock since May 2017, and we do not presently plan to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, we used an expected dividend yield was determined using the historical dividend payout and a trailing twelve month closing stock price on the grant date.of zero. The risk-free rate was determined based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yields over the three-year performance period.
The following table summarizes the MSUs activity during fiscal 2017:2020: | | | | Shares | | Weighted- average Grant-date Fair Value | Shares | | Weighted- average Grant-date Fair Value |
| | (In thousands) | | | (In thousands) | | |
| Outstanding at October 1, 2016 | 142 |
| | $ | 100.40 |
| |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | | 100 |
| | $ | 188.63 |
|
| Granted | 155 |
| | 108.09 |
| 96 |
| | 249.13 |
|
| Released | (166 | ) | | 89.09 |
| (123 | ) | | 171.42 |
|
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 131 |
| | $ | 123.82 |
| |
| Forfeited | | (10 | ) | | 202.48 |
|
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | | 63 |
| | $ | 311.91 |
|
The weighted averageweighted-average fair value of the MSUs granted were $108.09, $100.63$249.13, $169.46 and $101.85$151.78 during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the MSUs that vested was $20.2$44.6 million, $9.2$21.6 million and $1.7$18.7 million during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, determined as of the date of vesting.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The compensation expense on the employee stock purchase plan arises from the 15% discount offered to participants. During fiscal 2020, a total of 50,298 shares of our common stock with a weighted-average purchase price of $334.21 per share was issued under the 2019 Purchase Plan. As our first semi-annual offering period started on September 1, 2019, there were 0 shares purchased during fiscal 2019.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
15.14. Earnings per Share
The following table presents reconciliations for the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share — net income | $ | 236,411 |
| | $ | 192,124 |
| | $ | 126,482 |
|
| Denominator — share: | | | | | |
| Basic weighted-average shares | 29,067 |
| | 28,980 |
| | 29,711 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities | 865 |
| | 1,314 |
| | 1,469 |
|
| Diluted weighted-average shares | 29,932 |
| | 30,294 |
| | 31,180 |
|
| Earnings per share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 8.13 |
| | $ | 6.63 |
| | $ | 4.26 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 7.90 |
| | $ | 6.34 |
| | $ | 4.06 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share — net income | $ | 128,256 |
| | $ | 109,448 |
| | $ | 86,502 |
|
| Denominator — share: | | | | | |
| Basic weighted-average shares | 30,862 |
| | 31,129 |
| | 31,402 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities | 1,383 |
| | 1,179 |
| | 1,207 |
|
| Diluted weighted-average shares | 32,245 |
| | 32,308 |
| | 32,609 |
|
| Earnings per share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 4.16 |
| | $ | 3.52 |
| | $ | 2.75 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 3.98 |
| | $ | 3.39 |
| | $ | 2.65 |
|
The computationAnti-dilutive stock-based awards excluded from the calculations of diluted EPS excludes options to purchase approximately 8,000, 9,000, and 138,000 shares of common stock for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, becausewere immaterial during the exercise prices of the options exceeded the average market price of our common stock in these fiscal years and their inclusion would be antidilutive.periods presented.
16. Related Party Transactions
We have a $10 million investment in convertible preferred stock of a private company. The company is developing a range of products focused on revenue cycle activities for hospitals and healthcare providers. Related party revenue was immaterial for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The accounts receivable balance from this company was not significant as of September 30, 2017 and 2016.
17.15. Segment Information
We are organized into the following three3 operating segments, each of which is a reportable segment, to align with internal management of our worldwide business operations based on product offerings.
| |
| • | Applications.This segment includes pre-configured decision management applications designed for a specific type of business problem or process — such as marketing, account origination, customer management, fraud, financial crimes compliance, collections and insurance claims management — as well as associated professional services. These applications are available to our customers as on-premises software, and many are available as hosted, software-as-a-service (“SaaS”)SaaS applications through the FICO® Analytic Cloud.Cloud or AWS. |
Scores. This segment includes our business-to-business scoring solutions, our myFICO® solutions for consumers and associated professional services. Our scoring solutions give our clients access to analytics that can be easily integrated into their transaction streams and decision-making processes. Our scoring solutions are distributed through major credit reporting agencies, as well as services through which we provide our scores to clients directly.
| |
| • | Scores. This segment includes our business-to-business scoring solutions and services, our business-to-consumer scoring solutions and services including myFICO® solutions for consumers, and associated professional services. Our scoring solutions give our clients access to analytics that can be easily integrated into their transaction streams and decision-making processes. Our scoring solutions are distributed through major credit reporting agencies worldwide, as well as services through which we provide our scores to clients directly. |
| |
| • | Decision Management Software. This segment is composed of analytic and decision management software tools that clients can use to create their own custom decision management applications, our new FICO® Decision Management Suite, as well as associated professional services. Decision management software is currently delivered as part of the FICO® Decision Management Platform and is increasingly being adopted to connect decisioning solutions or previously disconnected use cases. These tools are available to our customers as on-premises software, or through the FICO® Analytic Cloud.Cloud or AWS. |
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates segment financial performance based on segment revenues and segment operating income. Segment operating expenses consist of direct and indirect costs principally related to personnel, facilities, consulting, travel and depreciation. Indirect costs are allocated to the segments generally based on relative segment revenues, fixed rates established by management based upon estimated expense contribution levels and other assumptions that management considers reasonable. We do not allocate broad-based incentive expense, share-based compensation expense, restructuring and acquisition-related expense, amortization expense, various corporate charges and certain other income and expense measures to our segments. These income and expense items are not allocated because they are not considered in evaluating the segment’s operating performance. Our Chief Executive Officer does not evaluate the financial performance of each segment based on its respective assets or capital expenditures; rather, depreciation amounts are allocated to the segments from their internal cost centers as described above.
The following tables summarize segment information for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2017 |
| | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Unallocated Corporate Expenses | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Segment revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 348,861 |
| | $ | 259,780 |
| | $ | 44,019 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 652,660 |
|
| Professional services | 141,857 |
| | 2,849 |
| | 34,863 |
| | — |
| | 179,569 |
|
| License | 62,449 |
| | 3,725 |
| | 33,766 |
| | — |
| | 99,940 |
|
| Total segment revenues | 553,167 |
| | 266,354 |
| | 112,648 |
| | — |
| | 932,169 |
|
| Segment operating expense | (393,667 | ) | | (54,436 | ) | | (123,466 | ) | | (104,998 | ) | | (676,567 | ) |
| Segment operating income (loss) | $ | 159,500 |
| | $ | 211,918 |
| | $ | (10,818 | ) | | $ | (104,998 | ) | | $ | 255,602 |
|
| Unallocated share-based compensation expense | | | | | | | | | (61,222 | ) |
| Unallocated amortization expense | | | | | | | | | (12,709 | ) |
| Unallocated restructuring and acquisition-related expenses | | | | | | | | | (4,471 | ) |
| Operating income | | | | | | | | | 177,200 |
|
| Unallocated interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | (25,790 | ) |
| Unallocated other expense, net | | | | | | | | | (86 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | | $ | 151,324 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 15,857 |
| | $ | 991 |
| | $ | 4,783 |
| | $ | 1,349 |
| | $ | 22,980 |
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
The following tables summarize segment information for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018:
| | | | Year Ended September 30, 2016 | Year Ended September 30, 2020 |
| | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Unallocated Corporate Expenses | | Total | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Unallocated Corporate Expenses | | Total |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Segment revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 328,472 |
| | $ | 233,655 |
| | $ | 43,792 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 605,919 |
| $ | 393,994 |
| | $ | 517,024 |
| | $ | 62,915 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 973,933 |
|
| Professional services | 138,775 |
| | 4,185 |
| | 26,778 |
| | — |
| | 169,738 |
| 136,677 |
| | 1,600 |
| | 44,763 |
| | — |
| | 183,040 |
|
| License | 65,395 |
| | 3,219 |
| | 37,085 |
| | — |
| | 105,699 |
| 71,375 |
| | 9,923 |
| | 56,291 |
| | — |
| | 137,589 |
|
| Total segment revenues | 532,642 |
| | 241,059 |
| | 107,655 |
| | — |
| | 881,356 |
| 602,046 |
| | 528,547 |
| | 163,969 |
| | — |
| | 1,294,562 |
|
| Segment operating expense | (364,371 | ) | | (55,975 | ) | | (111,315 | ) | | (110,612 | ) | | (642,273 | ) | (448,505 | ) | | (74,237 | ) | | (187,444 | ) | | (144,704 | ) | | (854,890 | ) |
| Segment operating income (loss) | $ | 168,271 |
| | $ | 185,084 |
| | $ | (3,660 | ) | | $ | (110,612 | ) | | 239,083 |
| $ | 153,541 |
| | $ | 454,310 |
| | $ | (23,475 | ) | | $ | (144,704 | ) | | $ | 439,672 |
|
| Unallocated share-based compensation expense | | | | | | | | | (55,509 | ) | | | | | | | | | (93,681 | ) |
| Unallocated amortization expense | | | | | | | | | (13,982 | ) | | | | | | | | | (4,993 | ) |
| Unallocated restructuring and impairment charges | | | | | | | | | | (45,029 | ) |
| Operating income | | | | | | | | | 169,592 |
| | | | | | | | | 295,969 |
|
| Unallocated interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | (26,633 | ) | | | | | | | | | (42,177 | ) |
| Unallocated other income, net | | | | | | | | | 1,610 |
| | | | | | | | | 3,208 |
|
| Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | | $ | 144,569 |
| | | | | | | | | $ | 257,000 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 11,852 |
| | $ | 814 |
| | $ | 3,657 |
| | $ | 1,328 |
| | $ | 17,651 |
| $ | 18,021 |
| | $ | 617 |
| | $ | 4,397 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | 23,453 |
|
| | | | Year Ended September 30, 2015 | Year Ended September 30, 2019 |
| | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Unallocated Corporate Expenses | | Total | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Unallocated Corporate Expenses | | Total |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Segment revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 320,596 |
| | $ | 200,426 |
| | $ | 43,210 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 564,232 |
| $ | 395,398 |
| | $ | 415,288 |
| | $ | 50,262 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 860,948 |
|
| Professional services | 124,562 |
| | 2,901 |
| | 24,310 |
| | — |
| | 151,773 |
| 137,258 |
| | 2,157 |
| | 44,680 |
| | — |
| | 184,095 |
|
| License | 81,116 |
| | 3,680 |
| | 37,980 |
| | — |
| | 122,776 |
| 72,378 |
| | 3,732 |
| | 38,930 |
| | — |
| | 115,040 |
|
| Total segment revenues | 526,274 |
| | 207,007 |
| | 105,500 |
| | — |
| | 838,781 |
| 605,034 |
| | 421,177 |
| | 133,872 |
| | — |
| | 1,160,083 |
|
| Segment operating expense | (366,666 | ) | | (55,793 | ) | | (111,850 | ) | | (89,744 | ) | | (624,053 | ) | (443,872 | ) | | (59,821 | ) | | (168,988 | ) | | (144,755 | ) | | (817,436 | ) |
| Segment operating income (loss) | $ | 159,608 |
| | $ | 151,214 |
| | $ | (6,350 | ) | | $ | (89,744 | ) | | 214,728 |
| $ | 161,162 |
| | $ | 361,356 |
| | $ | (35,116 | ) | | $ | (144,755 | ) | | 342,647 |
|
| Unallocated share-based compensation expense | | | | | | | | | (45,308 | ) | | | | | | | | | (82,973 | ) |
| Unallocated amortization expense | | | | | | | | | (13,673 | ) | | | | | | | | | (6,126 | ) |
| Unallocated restructuring and acquisition-related expenses | | | | | | | | | (18,242 | ) | |
| Operating income | | | | | | | | | 137,505 |
| | | | | | | | | 253,548 |
|
| Unallocated interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | (29,150 | ) | | | | | | | | | (39,752 | ) |
| Unallocated other income, net | | | | | | | | | 883 |
| | | | | | | | | 2,276 |
|
| Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | | $ | 109,238 |
| | | | | | | | | $ | 216,072 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 13,861 |
| | $ | 921 |
| | $ | 3,087 |
| | $ | 2,347 |
| | $ | 20,216 |
| $ | 18,766 |
| | $ | 498 |
| | $ | 4,036 |
| | $ | 904 |
| | $ | 24,204 |
|
Our revenues and percentage of revenues by reportable market segments were as follows for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, the majority of which were derived from the sale of products and services within the banking (including consumer credit) industry:
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2018 |
| | Applications | | Scores | | Decision Management Software | | Unallocated Corporate Expenses | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Segment revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
| Transactional and maintenance | $ | 372,283 |
| | $ | 331,662 |
| | $ | 46,658 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 750,603 |
|
| Professional services | 142,736 |
| | 1,900 |
| | 32,274 |
| | — |
| | 176,910 |
|
| License | 49,356 |
| | 2,308 |
| | 20,969 |
| | — |
| | 72,633 |
|
| Total segment revenues | 564,375 |
| | 335,870 |
| | 99,901 |
| | — |
| | 1,000,146 |
|
| Segment operating expense | (420,411 | ) | | (63,452 | ) | | (134,261 | ) | | (125,255 | ) | | (743,379 | ) |
| Segment operating income (loss) | $ | 143,964 |
| | $ | 272,418 |
| | $ | (34,360 | ) | | $ | (125,255 | ) | | 256,767 |
|
| Unallocated share-based compensation expense | | | | | | | | | (74,814 | ) |
| Unallocated amortization expense | | | | | | | | | (6,594 | ) |
| Operating income | | | | | | | | | 175,359 |
|
| Unallocated interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | (31,311 | ) |
| Unallocated other income, net | | | | | | | | | 12,884 |
|
| Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | | $ | 156,932 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 15,651 |
| | $ | 555 |
| | $ | 5,471 |
| | $ | 956 |
| | $ | 22,633 |
|
Information about disaggregated revenue by product deployment methods was as follows:
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | Year Ended September 30, 2020 |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| Reportable Segments | | On-Premises | | SaaS | | Scores | | Total | | Percentage |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Applications | $ | 553,167 |
| | 59 | % | | $ | 532,642 |
| | 61 | % | | $ | 526,274 |
| | 63 | % | $ | 340,702 |
| | $ | 261,344 |
| | $ | 0 |
| | $ | 602,046 |
| | 46 | % |
| Scores | 266,354 |
| | 29 | % | | 241,059 |
| | 27 | % | | 207,007 |
| | 25 | % | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 528,547 |
| | 528,547 |
| | 41 | % |
| Decision Management Software | 112,648 |
| | 12 | % | | 107,655 |
| | 12 | % | | 105,500 |
| | 12 | % | 125,269 |
| | 38,700 |
| | 0 |
| | 163,969 |
| | 13 | % |
| Total | $ | 932,169 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 881,356 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 838,781 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 465,971 |
| | $ | 300,044 |
| | $ | 528,547 |
| | $ | 1,294,562 |
| | 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2019 |
| Reportable Segments | On-Premises | | SaaS | | Scores | | Total | | Percentage |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Applications | $ | 360,105 |
| | $ | 244,929 |
| | $ | 0 |
| | $ | 605,034 |
| | 52 | % |
| Scores | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 421,177 |
| | 421,177 |
| | 36 | % |
| Decision Management Software | 108,447 |
| | 25,425 |
| | 0 |
| | 133,872 |
| | 12 | % |
| Total | $ | 468,552 |
| | $ | 270,354 |
| | $ | 421,177 |
| | $ | 1,160,083 |
| | 100 | % |
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2018 |
| Reportable Segments | On-Premises | | SaaS | | Scores | | Total | | Percentage |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Applications | $ | 337,162 |
| | $ | 227,213 |
| | $ | 0 |
| | $ | 564,375 |
| | 56 | % |
| Scores | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 335,870 |
| | 335,870 |
| | 34 | % |
| Decision Management Software | 86,172 |
| | 13,729 |
| | 0 |
| | 99,901 |
| | 10 | % |
| Total | $ | 423,334 |
| | $ | 240,942 |
| | $ | 335,870 |
| | $ | 1,000,146 |
| | 100 | % |
We derive a significant portion of revenues internationally, and 32%, 34%, and 35% of total consolidated revenues were derived from clients outside the U.S. during fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Information about disaggregated revenue by primary geographical markets was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2020 |
| Reportable Segments | North America | | Latin America | | Europe, Middle East and Africa | | Asia Pacific | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Applications | $ | 331,290 |
| | $ | 40,047 |
| | $ | 157,793 |
| | $ | 72,916 |
| | $ | 602,046 |
|
| Scores | 511,333 |
| | 3,576 |
| | 6,385 |
| | 7,253 |
| | 528,547 |
|
| Decision Management Software | 87,305 |
| | 18,674 |
| | 39,406 |
| | 18,584 |
| | 163,969 |
|
| Total | $ | 929,928 |
| | $ | 62,297 |
| | $ | 203,584 |
| | $ | 98,753 |
| | $ | 1,294,562 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2019 |
| Reportable Segments | North America | | Latin America | | Europe, Middle East and Africa | | Asia Pacific | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Applications | $ | 338,990 |
| | $ | 42,656 |
| | $ | 155,539 |
| | $ | 67,849 |
| | $ | 605,034 |
|
| Scores | 404,778 |
| | 4,591 |
| | 6,359 |
| | 5,449 |
| | 421,177 |
|
| Decision Management Software | 63,397 |
| | 18,040 |
| | 33,288 |
| | 19,147 |
| | 133,872 |
|
| Total | $ | 807,165 |
| | $ | 65,287 |
| | $ | 195,186 |
| | $ | 92,445 |
| | $ | 1,160,083 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, 2018 |
| Reportable Segments | North America | | Latin America | | Europe, Middle East and Africa | | Asia Pacific | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Applications | $ | 318,836 |
| | $ | 39,136 |
| | $ | 141,358 |
| | $ | 65,045 |
| | $ | 564,375 |
|
| Scores | 328,990 |
| | 1,366 |
| | 3,989 |
| | 1,525 |
| | 335,870 |
|
| Decision Management Software | 53,184 |
| | 5,035 |
| | 24,245 |
| | 17,437 |
| | 99,901 |
|
| Total | $ | 701,010 |
| | $ | 45,537 |
| | $ | 169,592 |
| | $ | 84,007 |
| | $ | 1,000,146 |
|
Within our Applications segment our fraud solutions accounted for 19%15%, 20%18% and 23%17% of total revenues in each of fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, and our customer communication services accounted for 10%, 9% and 8% of total revenues in each of these periods, respectively; and our customer management solutions accounted for 8%, 9% and 9%10% of total revenues in each of these periods, respectively.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and percentage2018
Revenue generated from a single customer or a group of revenues on a geographical basiscustomers which represented 10% or greater of total revenue are summarized below for fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Experian | $ | 181,036 |
| | 14 | % | | $ | 148,037 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 109,097 |
| | 11 | % |
| TransUnion and Equifax | 239,166 |
| | 18 | % | | 183,523 |
| | 16 | % | | 142,179 |
| | 14 | % |
| Other customers | 874,360 |
| | 68 | % | | 828,523 |
| | 71 | % | | 748,870 |
| | 75 | % |
| Total | $ | 1,294,562 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 1,160,083 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 1,000,146 |
| | 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| United States | $ | 598,765 |
| | 64 | % | | $ | 567,443 |
| | 64 | % | | $ | 505,109 |
| | 60 | % |
| United Kingdom | 71,989 |
| | 8 | % | | 86,485 |
| | 10 | % | | 93,855 |
| | 11 | % |
| Other countries | 261,415 |
| | 28 | % | | 227,428 |
| | 26 | % | | 239,817 |
| | 29 | % |
| Total | $ | 932,169 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 881,356 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 838,781 |
| | 100 | % |
During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues; however, we derive a substantial portion of revenues from our contracts with the three major credit reporting agencies, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax. Revenues collectively generated by agreements with these customers accounted for 20%, 19% and 16% of our total revenues in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At September 30, 20172020 and 2016, no2019, 0 individual customer accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated receivables.
Our property and equipment, net, on a geographical basis are summarized below at September 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| United States | $ | 29,375 |
| | 63 | % | | $ | 38,058 |
| | 72 | % |
| United Kingdom | 8,776 |
| | 19 | % | | 7,801 |
| | 15 | % |
| Other countries | 8,268 |
| | 18 | % | | 7,168 |
| | 13 | % |
| Total | $ | 46,419 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 53,027 |
| | 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| United States | $ | 30,773 |
| | 76 | % | | $ | 36,083 |
| | 80 | % |
| United Kingdom | 4,893 |
| | 12 | % | | 3,769 |
| | 8 | % |
| Other countries | 5,037 |
| | 12 | % | | 5,270 |
| | 12 | % |
| Total | $ | 40,703 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 45,122 |
| | 100 | % |
16. Contract Balances and Performance Obligations
Contract Balances
We record a receivable when we satisfy a performance obligation prior to invoicing if only the passage of time is required before payment is due or if we have an unconditional right to consideration before we satisfy a performance obligation. We record a contract asset when we satisfy a performance obligation prior to invoicing but our right to consideration is conditional. We record deferred revenue when the payment is made or due before we satisfy a performance obligation.
Receivables at September 30, 2020 and 2019 consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Billed | $ | 211,776 |
| | $ | 206,714 |
|
| Unbilled | 181,550 |
| | 127,651 |
|
| | 393,326 |
| | 334,365 |
|
| Less: allowance for doubtful accounts | (5,072 | ) | | (2,568 | ) |
| Net receivables | 388,254 |
| | 331,797 |
|
| Less: long-term receivables * | (54,074 | ) | | (34,370 | ) |
| Short-term receivables * | 334,180 |
| | 297,427 |
|
(*) Short-term receivables and long-term receivables were recorded in accounts receivable, net and other assets, respectively, within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
18. CommitmentsActivity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
Minimum future commitments under non-cancelable operating leases and other obligations were as follows |
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts, beginning balance | $ | 2,568 |
| | $ | 3,439 |
|
| Add: expense | 3,199 |
| | 518 |
|
| Less: write-offs (net of recoveries) | (695 | ) | | (1,389 | ) |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts, ending balance | $ | 5,072 |
| | $ | 2,568 |
|
Contract assets balance at September 30, 2017: 2020 and 2019 was immaterial.
Deferred revenue primarily relates to our maintenance and SaaS contracts billed annually in advance and generally recognized ratably over the term of the service period. Significant changes in the deferred revenues balances are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Deferred revenues, beginning balance | $ | 116,320 |
| | $ | 108,118 |
|
| Revenue recognized that was included in the deferred revenues balance at the beginning of the period | (101,640 | ) | | (93,265 | ) |
| Increases due to billings, excluding amounts recognized as revenue during the period | 107,461 |
| | 101,467 |
|
| Deferred revenues, ending balance (*) | $ | 122,141 |
| | $ | 116,320 |
|
|
| | | |
| Year Ended September 30, | Future Minimum Lease Commitments |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | $ | 23,787 |
|
| 2019 | 22,042 |
|
| 2020 | 13,414 |
|
| 2021 | 9,619 |
|
| 2022 | 9,104 |
|
| Thereafter | 22,790 |
|
| Total | $ | 100,756 |
|
(*) Ending balance at September 30, 2020 included current portion of $115.1 million and long-term portion of $7.0 million that were recorded in deferred revenue and other liabilities, respectively, within the consolidated balance sheets. Ending balance at September 30, 2019 included current portion of $111.0 million and long-term portion of $5.3 million that were recorded in deferred revenue and other liabilities, respectively, within the consolidated balance sheets.
Lease CommitmentsPayment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within 30 to 60 days. In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, we have determined our contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. The primary purpose of our invoicing terms is to provide customers with simplified and predictable ways of purchasing our products and services, not to provide customers with financing or to receive financing from our customers. Examples include multi-year on-premises licenses that are invoiced annually with revenue recognized upfront, and invoicing at the beginning of a subscription term with revenue recognized ratably over the contract period.
The abovePerformance Obligations
Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations represents contracted revenue that will be recognized in future periods, which is comprised of deferred revenue and amounts have contractual sublease commitments totaling $0.3that will be invoiced and recognized as revenue in future periods. This does not include:
Revenue that will be recognized in future periods from usage-based royalty from license sales;
SaaS transactional revenue from variable considerations that will be recognized in the distinct service period during which it is earned; and
| |
| • | Revenue from variable considerations that will be recognized in accordance with the “right-to-invoice” practical expedient, such as fees from our professional services billed basedon a time and materials basis. |
Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations was $298.0 million for fiscalas of September 30, 2020, of which we expect to recognize approximately 50% over the next 18 months and the remainder thereafter. Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations was $238.4 million as of September 30, 2019.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
17. Leases
We lease office space and fiscal 2019. We occupydata centers under operating lease arrangements, which constitute the majority of our facilities under non-cancelable operating leaseslease obligations. We also enter into finance lease agreements from time to time for certain computer equipment. For any lease with a lease termsterm in excess of one year. Such facility12 months, the related lease assets and liabilities are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as either operating or finance leases generally provideat the commencement of an agreement where it is determined that a lease exists. We have lease agreements that contain both lease and non-lease components, and we have elected to combine these components together and account for annual increasesthem as a single lease component for all classes of assets. Leases with a lease term of 12 months or less are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. Furthermore, we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Operating lease assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. These assets and liabilities are recognized based uponon the Consumer Price Index or fixed increments. Rent expense underpresent value of future payments over the lease term at the commencement date. We use a collateralized incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date, including the lease term, in determining the present value of future payments. In calculating the incremental borrowing rates, we consider recent ratings from credit agencies and current lease demographic information. Our operating leases also typically require payment of real estate taxes, common area maintenance, insurance and other operating costs as well as payments that are adjusted based on a consumer price index. These components comprise the majority of our variable lease cost and are excluded from the present value of our lease obligations. In instances where they are fixed, they are included due to our election to combine lease and non-lease components. Operating lease assets also include prepaid lease payments and initial direct costs, and are reduced by lease incentives. Our lease terms generally do not include options to extend or terminate the lease unless it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Fixed payments may contain predetermined fixed rent escalations. We recognize the related rent expense on a straight-line basis from the commencement date to the end of the lease term.
As a strategic cost initiative in fiscal 2020 we committed to a course of action to adjust our facilities footprint in light of post-pandemic workforce patterns, including month-to-monthclosing certain non-core offices and reducing office space in other locations to better align with anticipated needs. As a result of this initiative, we recorded a net impairment of $28.0 million on operating lease right-of-use assets. Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, these adjustments were described as restructuring expenses - facilities charges. See Note 11 for additional information regarding our restructuring and impairment charges.
The following table presents the lease balances within the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2020:
|
| | | | | |
| | Balance Sheet Location | | September 30, 2020 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Assets | | | |
| Operating leases | Operating lease right-of-use assets | | $ | 57,656 |
|
| Finance leases (*) | Property and equipment, net | | 5,021 |
|
| Total lease assets | | | $ | 62,677 |
|
| Liabilities | | | |
| Current: | | | |
| Operating leases | Other accrued liabilities | | $ | 22,787 |
|
| Finance leases | Other accrued liabilities | | 2,186 |
|
| Non-current: | | | |
| Operating leases | Operating lease liabilities | | 73,207 |
|
| Finance leases | Other liabilities | | 3,076 |
|
| Total lease liabilities | | | $ | 101,256 |
|
(*) Finance leases totaled $18.6 million, $17.6 millionare recorded net of accumulated depreciation of $1.5 million.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and $20.7 million during2018
The components of our operating and finance lease expenses were as follows:
|
| | | |
| | Year Ended
September 30, 2020 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Operating lease cost | $ | 23,624 |
|
| Finance lease cost: | |
| Depreciation of lease assets | 2,078 |
|
| Interest on lease liabilities | 186 |
|
| Short-term lease cost | 1,171 |
|
| Variable lease cost | 3,264 |
|
| Total lease cost | $ | 30,323 |
|
The following table presents weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average discount rates related to our operating and finance leases:
|
| | | | | |
| | September 30, 2020 |
| | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (in months) | 63 |
| | 29 |
|
| Weighted-average discount rate | 3.86 | % | | 2.56 | % |
Supplemental cash flow information related to our operating and finance leases was as follows: |
| | | |
| | Year Ended
September 30, 2020 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |
| Operating cash outflow for operating leases | $ | 18,801 |
|
| Operating cash outflow for finance leases | 186 |
|
| Financing cash outflow for finance leases | 1,716 |
|
| Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities: | |
| Operating leases | 11,457 |
|
| Finance leases | 1,387 |
|
Future lease payments under our non-cancellable leases as of September 30, 2020 were as follows: |
| | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases |
| Fiscal 2021 | $ | 26,047 |
| | $ | 2,397 |
|
| Fiscal 2022 | 21,925 |
| | 2,240 |
|
| Fiscal 2023 | 17,109 |
| | 784 |
|
| Fiscal 2024 | 14,384 |
| | 0 |
|
| Fiscal 2025 | 9,004 |
| | 0 |
|
| Thereafter | 17,131 |
| | 0 |
|
| Total future undiscounted lease payments | 105,600 |
| | 5,421 |
|
| Less imputed interest | (9,606 | ) | | (159 | ) |
| Total reported lease liability | $ | 95,994 |
| | $ | 5,262 |
|
In accordance with the prior guidance—ASC 840, Leases—our leases were previously designated as either capital or operating. Previously designated capital leases are now considered finance leases under the new guidance, Topic 842. The
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
designation of operating leases remains substantially unchanged under the new guidance. The future minimum lease payments by fiscal 2017, 2016year as determined prior to the adoption of Topic 842 under our previously designated capital and 2015, respectively.operating leases as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019, were as follows:
Other |
| | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Operating Leases | | Capital Leases |
| Fiscal 2020 | $ | 19,842 |
| | $ | 1,935 |
|
| Fiscal 2021 | 19,969 |
| | 1,934 |
|
| Fiscal 2022 | 17,677 |
| | 1,934 |
|
| Fiscal 2023 | 16,940 |
| | 0 |
|
| Fiscal 2024 | 14,887 |
| | 0 |
|
| Thereafter | 24,431 |
| | 0 |
|
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 113,746 |
| | 5,803 |
|
| Less amount representing interest | | | (379 | ) |
| Present value of minimum lease payments | | | $ | 5,424 |
|
18. Commitments
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual purchase obligations and other agreements that are legally binding and specify certain minimum payment terms.
We are also a party to a management agreement with 23 of our executives providing for certain payments and other benefits in the event of a qualified change in control of FICO, coupled with a termination of the officer during the following year.
19. Contingencies
We are in disputes with certain customers regarding amounts owed in connection with the sale of certain of our products and services. We also have had claims asserted by former employees relating to compensation and other employment matters. We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We record litigation accruals for legal matters which are both probable and estimable. For legal proceedings for which there is a reasonable possibility of loss (meaning those losses for which the likelihood is more than remote but less than probable), we have determined we do not have material exposure on an aggregate basis.
20. Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, we are not subject to potential obligations under guarantees, except for standard indemnification and warranty provisions that are contained within many of our customer license and service agreements and certain supplier agreements, including underwriter agreements, as well as standard indemnification agreements that we have executed with certain of our officers and directors, and give rise only to the disclosure in the consolidated financial statements. In addition, we continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the guarantees and indemnifications to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred, and would recognize any such losses under the guarantees and indemnifications when those losses are estimable.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Indemnification and warranty provisions contained within our customer license and service agreements and certain supplier agreements are generally consistent with those prevalent in our industry. The duration of our product warranties generally does not exceed 90 days following delivery of our products. We have not incurred significant obligations under customer indemnification or warranty provisions historically and do not expect to incur significant obligations in the future. Accordingly, we do not maintain accruals for potential customer indemnification or warranty-related obligations. The indemnification agreements that we have executed with certain of our officers and directors would require us to indemnify such officers and directors in certain instances. We have not incurred obligations under these indemnification agreements historically and do not expect to incur significant obligations in the future. Accordingly, we do not maintain accruals for potential officer or director indemnification obligations. The maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make under the indemnification provisions in our customer license and service agreements, and officer and director agreements is unlimited.
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018
21. Supplementary Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents selected unaudited consolidated financial results for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period ended September 30, 2017.2020. In the opinion of management, this unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited information and includes all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, except as noted below) necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated financial information for the period presented.
| | | | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended |
| | September 30,
2017 | | June 30,
2017 | | March 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | September 30,
2020 | | June 30,
2020 | | March 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues | $ | 253,205 |
| | $ | 230,986 |
| | $ | 228,378 |
| | $ | 219,600 |
| $ | 374,356 |
| | $ | 313,731 |
| | $ | 307,971 |
| | $ | 298,504 |
|
| Cost of revenues (1) | 75,202 |
| | 69,793 |
| | 72,131 |
| | 69,997 |
| 93,676 |
| | 88,569 |
| | 88,139 |
| | 90,758 |
|
| Gross profit | 178,003 |
| | 161,193 |
| | 156,247 |
| | 149,603 |
| 280,680 |
| | 225,162 |
| | 219,832 |
| | 207,746 |
|
| Net income | $ | 40,044 |
| | $ | 25,227 |
| | $ | 25,084 |
| | $ | 37,901 |
| $ | 59,126 |
| | $ | 64,076 |
| | $ | 58,288 |
| | $ | 54,921 |
|
| Earnings per share (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
| | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| $ | 2.04 |
| | $ | 2.21 |
| | $ | 2.00 |
| | $ | 1.89 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 1.25 |
| | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 1.16 |
| $ | 1.98 |
| | $ | 2.15 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
|
| Shares used in computing earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 30,534 |
| | 30,914 |
| | 31,017 |
| | 30,989 |
| 29,045 |
| | 29,005 |
| | 29,194 |
| | 29,025 |
|
| Diluted | 31,963 |
| | 32,224 |
| | 32,260 |
| | 32,536 |
| 29,833 |
| | 29,744 |
| | 29,985 |
| | 30,169 |
|
| | | | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended |
| | September 30,
2016 | | June 30,
2016 | | March 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | September 30,
2019 | | June 30,
2019 | | March 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues | $ | 235,824 |
| | $ | 238,778 |
| | $ | 206,678 |
| | $ | 200,076 |
| $ | 305,344 |
| | $ | 314,249 |
| | $ | 278,234 |
| | $ | 262,256 |
|
| Cost of revenues (1) | 74,298 |
| | 66,384 |
| | 62,298 |
| | 62,193 |
| 87,996 |
| | 87,215 |
| | 85,568 |
| | 76,066 |
|
| Gross profit | 161,526 |
| | 172,394 |
| | 144,380 |
| | 137,883 |
| 217,348 |
| | 227,034 |
| | 192,666 |
| | 186,190 |
|
| Net income | $ | 32,104 |
| | $ | 34,987 |
| | $ | 23,116 |
| | $ | 19,241 |
| $ | 54,584 |
| | $ | 64,152 |
| | $ | 33,381 |
| | $ | 40,007 |
|
| Earnings per share (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 1.12 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
| | $ | 0.62 |
| $ | 1.89 |
| | $ | 2.21 |
| | $ | 1.15 |
| | $ | 1.38 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| $ | 1.80 |
| | $ | 2.12 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
|
| Shares used in computing earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 30,916 |
| | 31,149 |
| | 31,268 |
| | 31,185 |
| 28,918 |
| | 28,967 |
| | 29,074 |
| | 28,961 |
|
| Diluted | 32,221 |
| | 32,313 |
| | 32,262 |
| | 32,436 |
| 30,290 |
| | 30,292 |
| | 30,259 |
| | 30,336 |
|
| |
| (1) | Cost of revenues excludes amortization expense of $1.4$0.3 million, $1.7$0.4 million, $1.7$0.5 million, $1.7$0.6 million, $1.7$0.5 million, $1.8$0.5 million, $1.8$0.5 million and $1.9$0.5 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2017,2020, June 30, 2017,2020, March 31, 2017,2020, December 31, 2016,2019, September 30, 2016,2019, June 30, 2016,2019, March 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, respectively. |
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015
| |
| (2) | Earnings per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal the totals for the respective years. |
22. Subsequent Events
In October 2017, our Board2020, we entered into a purchase agreement with Rackspace US, Inc. (“Rackspace”) pursuant to which Rackspace will provide to us primary cloud infrastructure services as a reseller of Directors approvedAWS. The initial term is a new stock repurchase program followingfive-year period for which we have a minimum purchase obligation of $120 million over the completion of a similar program that was approved in July 2016. The new program is open-ended and authorizes repurchases of shares of our common stockfirst 3 years with the ability to roll up to an aggregate cost$12 million into a fourth year if we spend less than the minimum commitment. The purpose of $250.0 million in the open market or in negotiated transactions.this agreement is to replace services that were previously provided directly through AWS.
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of FICO’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of FICO’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that FICO’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by FICO in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in FICO’s internal control over financial reporting was identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the year ended September 30, 2017,2020, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, FICO’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20172020 based on the guidelines established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2017.2020.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017,2020, as stated in their attestation report included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9B.Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The required information regarding our Directors is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Director“Our Director Nominees” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
Our current executive officers are as follows:
|
| | |
| Name | Positions Held | Age |
| William J. Lansing | January 2012-present, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of the Company. February 2009-November 2010, Chief Executive Offer and President, Infospace, Inc. 2004-2007, Chief Executive Officer and President, ValueVision Media, Inc. 2001-2003, General Partner, General Atlantic LLC. 2000-2001, Chief Executive Officer, NBC Internet, Inc. 1998-2000, President/Chief Executive Officer, Fingerhut Companies, Inc. 1996-1998, Vice President, Corporate Business Development, General Electric Company. 1996, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Office, Prodigy, Inc. 1986-1995, various positions, McKinsey & Company, Inc. | 5962 |
| | | |
Michael J. PungI. McLaughlin | November 2010-present,August 2019-present, Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. August 2004-November 2010,May 2007-August 2019, Managing Director, Head of Technology Corporate Finance of Morgan Stanley. January 2004-May 2007, Managing Director, Head of Enterprise Systems and Supply Chain Coverage of BofA Securities. January 2001-January 2004, Executive Director, Head of Enterprise Hardware and Supply Chain of UBS Investment Bank. 1997-2001, founder and co-Chief Executive Officer of Stampede Ventures, LLC. 1993-1997, Vice President Financeof Montgomery Securities. 1990-1993, Associate of The First Boston Corporation. 1986-1988, Analyst of The First Boston Corporation. | 56 |
| | |
| Thomas A. Bowers | August 2020-present, Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy of the Company. 2000-2004,September 2019-August 2020, Vice President, Business Consulting of the Company. April 2018-September 2019, Founder and Controller, Hubbard Media Group,Managing Partner, M Cubed Development, LLC. 1999-2000, Controller, Capella Education,August 2012-March 2018, Executive Vice President, American Savings Bank. 1987-2012, Senior partner and various positions, McKinsey & Company, Inc. 1998-1999, Controller, U.S. Satellite Broadcasting, | 65 |
| | |
| Stephanie Covert | October 2020-present, Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing of the Company. June 2016-October 2020, Vice President, Global Sales Operations of the Company. December 2015-May 2016, Vice President, Solution Success of the Company. June 2015-December 2015, Senior Director, Solution Success, Americas & EMEA of the Company. May 2014-June 2015, Senior Director, Solution Success, Americas of the Company. March 2013-May 2014, Senior Director, Sales Operations, Apttus. March 2012-March 2013, Sales Operations Director, Oracle Corporation. June 2007-March 2012, various positions, RightNow Technologies, Inc. 1992-1998, various financial management positions with Deluxe Corporation. 1985-1992, various audit positions, including audit manager, at Deloitte & Touche LLP. | 5441 |
| | | |
| Richard S. Deal | November 2015-present, Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company. August 2007-November 2015, Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company. January 2001-August 2007, Vice President, Human Resources of the Company. 1998-2001, Vice President, Human Resources, Arcadia Financial, Ltd. 1993-1998, managed broad range of human resources corporate and line consulting functions with U.S. Bancorp. | 50 |
| | |
Wayne Huyard
| November 2014-present, Executive Vice President of Sales, Services, and Marketing of the Company. January 2014-November 2014, Consultant to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. September 2012-November 2014, Chief Executive Officer and President, TEXbase, Inc. March 2012-May 2012, General Manager of RightNow Technologies, Oracle Corporation. July 2010-February 2012, President and Chief Operating Officer, RightNow Technologies, Inc. May 2006-May 2010, Operations and Advisory Group Executive Leadership Team Member, Cerberus Capital Management L.P. | 5853 |
| | | |
| Michael S. Leonard | November 2011-present, Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company. November 2007-November 2011, Senior Director, Finance of the Company. July 2000-November 2007, Director, Finance of the Company. 1998-2000, Controller of Natural Alternatives International, Inc. 1994-1998, various audit staff positions at KPMG LLP. | 5256 |
| | |
| Claus Moldt | August 2019-present, Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer of the Company. March 2016-August 2019, Chief Information Officer of the Company. June 2013-March 2016, Chief Executive Officer of mPath. October 2006-June 2013, Global Chief Information Officer and Senior Vice President of Technical Operations of Salesforce.com. November 2002-September 2006, Senior Director Operations Infrastructure and Project Delivery of eBay. May 2001-May 2002, Manager Database and System Administration, LoudCloud/Opsware. | 57 |
| | | |
| Mark R. Scadina | February 2009-present, Executive Vice President and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company. June 2007-February 2009, Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company. 2003-2007, various senior positions including Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Liberate Technologies, Inc. 1999-2003, various leadership positions including Vice President and General Counsel, Intertrust Technologies Corporation. 1994-1999, Associate, Pennie and Edmonds LLP. | 4851 |
| | | |
| James M. Wehmann | April 2012-present, Executive Vice President, Scores of the Company. November 2003-March 2012, Vice President/Senior Vice President, Global Marketing, Digital River, Inc. March 2002-June 2003, Vice President, Marketing, Brylane, Inc. September 2000-March 2002, Senior Vice President, Marketing, New Customer Acquisition, Bank One. 1993-2000, various roles, including Senior Vice President, Marketing, Fingerhut Companies, Inc. | 52 |
| | |
Stuart C. Wells | April 2012-present, Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer of the Company. June 2010- April 2012, Head of Global Professional Services and Support of the Company (Consultant). February 2009-June 2010, CEO, and Chairman of the Board, ScaleMP. January 2007-January 2009, Senior Vice President and President, Avaya, Inc. April 2005-December 2006, Executive Vice President, Utility Computing, Sun Microsystems. | 6155 |
The required information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
FICO has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management that applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other employees performing similar functions who have been identified by the Chief Executive Officer. We have posted the Code of Ethics on our website located at www.fico.com. FICO intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, this Code of Ethics by posting such information on its website. FICO also has a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics applicable to all directors, officers and employees, which is also available at the web sitewebsite cited above.
The required information regarding the Company’s audit committee is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Board Meetings, Committees and Attendance”Committees” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
Item 11.Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the information under the captions “Director Compensation for 2017,”Fiscal 2020” and “Executive Compensation,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”Compensation” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Security Ownership Ofof Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 Proxy Statement to be held on February 28, 2018.filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2020.
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
1. Consolidated Financial Statements:
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules are omitted as the required information is not applicable or as the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and related notes.
3. Exhibits:
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description |
| | |
| 3.1 | |
| | |
| 3.2 | |
| |
| 4.1 | |
| | |
| 10.1 | |
| | |
| 10.2 | |
| | |
| 10.3 | |
| |
| 10.4 | |
| |
| 10.5 | |
| | |
10.410.6 | |
| | |
10.510.7 | |
| | |
10.610.8 | |
| | |
10.710.9 | |
| | |
10.810.10 | |
| | |
10.910.11 | |
| | |
10.1010.12 | |
| | |
10.1110.13 | |
| | |
10.1210.14 | |
| | |
10.13 |
| |
| 10.15 | |
| | |
10.1410.16 | |
| | |
10.1510.17 | Letter Agreement dated February 6, 2012 by and between the Company and Michael Pung. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2012.) (1) |
| |
10.16 | |
| | |
|
| |
10.1710.18 | |
| |
10.18 | |
| | |
| 10.19 | |
| | |
| 10.20 | |
| | |
| 10.21 | |
| | |
| 10.22 | |
| | |
| 10.23 | |
| | |
| 10.24 | |
| | |
| 10.25 | |
| | |
| 10.26 | |
| | |
| 10.27 | |
| | |
| 10.28 | |
| | |
| 10.29 | |
| |
| 10.30 | |
| | |
10.3010.31 | |
| |
| 10.32 | |
| | |
10.3110.33 | |
| | |
10.32 |
| |
| 10.34 | |
| | |
10.3310.35 | |
| | |
10.3410.36 | |
| | |
|
| |
10.3510.37 | |
| | |
10.3610.38 | |
| | |
10.3710.39 | |
| |
10.38 | |
| |
10.39 | |
| | |
| 10.40 | |
| |
10.41 | |
| |
10.42 | |
| | |
10.4310.41 | |
| | |
10.4410.42 | |
| | |
10.4510.43 | |
| | |
10.4610.44 | |
| |
| 10.45 | |
| | |
10.4710.46 | |
| |
| 10.47 | |
| | |
| 10.48 | |
| |
| 10.49 | |
| | |
10.4910.50 | |
| | |
10.5010.51 | |
| |
|
| |
| 10.52 | |
| | |
12.1*10.53 | |
| |
| 10.54 | |
| |
| 10.55 | |
| |
| 10.56 | |
| |
| 10.57 | |
| |
| 10.58* | |
| |
| 10.59* | |
| | |
| 21.1* | |
| | |
| 23.1* | |
| | |
|
| |
| 31.1* | |
| | |
| 31.2* | |
| | |
| 32.1* | |
| | |
| 32.2* | |
| | |
101.INS101.INS* | Inline XBRL Instance Document.Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
| | |
101.SCH101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| | |
101.CAL101.CAL* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.DEF101.DEF* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.LAB101.LAB* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.PRE101.PRE* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
| |
| 104* | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). |
| |
| (1) | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| | FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION |
| | | |
| | By | /s/ MICHAEL J. PUNGI. MCLAUGHLIN |
| | | Michael J. PungI. McLaughlin |
| | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
DATE: November 9, 201710, 2020
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | |
| /s/ WILLIAM J. LANSING | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
| November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| William J. Lansing |
| | | |
/s/ MICHAEL J. PUNGI. MCLAUGHLIN | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
Michael J. PungI. McLaughlin |
| | | |
| /s/ MICHAEL S. LEONARD | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| Michael S. Leonard |
| | | |
| /s/ A. GEORGE BATTLE | Director | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| A. George Battle |
| | |
/s/ MARK W. BEGOR | Director | November 9, 2017 |
Mark W. Begor |
| | | |
| /s/ BRADEN R. KELLY | Director | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| Braden R. Kelly |
| | | |
| /s/ JAMES D. KIRSNER | Director | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| James D. Kirsner |
| | |
| /s/ EVA MANOLIS | Director | November 10, 2020 |
| Eva Manolis |
| | | |
| /s/ MARC F. MCMORRIS | Director | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| Marc F. McMorris |
| | | |
| /s/ JOANNA REES | Director | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| Joanna Rees |
| | | |
| /s/ DAVID A. REY | Director | November 9, 201710, 2020 |
| David A. Rey |
| | |
| /s/ FABIOLA R. ARREDONDO | Director | November 10, 2020 |
| Fabiola R. Arredondo |
