UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018
or
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 1-9743

EOG RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 47-0684736
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1111 Bagby, Sky Lobby 2, Houston, Texas   77002
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  713-651-7000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o  No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"filer," "smaller reporting company," and "smaller reporting"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ý    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting companyo    Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No ý

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.  Common Stock aggregate market value held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2016: $45,8222018: $71,861 million.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  Class: Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, 576,832,077580,053,225 shares outstanding as of February 17, 2017.15, 2019.

Documents incorporated by reference. Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant's 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2016,2018, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 



TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Page
PART I 
   
ITEM 1.Business
 General
 Business Segments
Exploration and Production
 Marketing
 Wellhead Volumes and Prices
 Competition
 Regulation
 Other Matters
 Executive Officers of the Registrant
ITEM 1A.Risk Factors
ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
ITEM 2.Properties
 Oil and Gas Exploration and Production - Properties and Reserves
ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings
ITEM 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
   
PART II 
   
ITEM 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
ITEM 6.Selected Financial Data
ITEM 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ITEM 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures
ITEM 9B.Other Information
   
PART III 
   
ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
ITEM 11.Executive Compensation
ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
ITEM 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
   
PART IV 
   
ITEM 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
ITEM 16.Form 10-K Summary
   
SIGNATURES 

(i)



PART I

ITEM 1.  Business

General

EOG Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation organized in 1985, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, EOG), explores for, develops, produces and markets crude oil and natural gas primarily in major producing basins in the United States of America (United States or U.S.), The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad), the United Kingdom (U.K.), The People's Republic of China (China), Canada and, from time to time, select other international areas.  EOG's principal producing areas are further described in "Exploration and Production" below.  EOG's Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports (including related exhibits and supplemental schedules, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act) are made available, free of charge, through EOG's website, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with, or furnished to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  EOG's website address is www.eogresources.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this report.

At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG's total estimated net proved reserves were 2,1472,928 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBoe), of which 1,1781,532 million barrels (MMBbl) were crude oil and condensate reserves, 416614 MMBbl were natural gas liquids (NGLs) reserves and 3,3184,687 billion cubic feet (Bcf), or 553782 MMBoe, were natural gas reserves (see "Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements").  At such date, approximately 97%98% of EOG's net proved reserves, on a crude oil equivalent basis, were located in the United States, 1% in Trinidad and 3%1% in Trinidad.other international areas.  Crude oil equivalent volumes are determined using a ratio of 1.0 barrel of crude oil and condensate or NGLs to 6.0 thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of natural gas.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, EOG employed approximately 2,6502,800 persons, including foreign national employees.

EOG's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related. For information regarding the risks associated with EOG's domestic and foreign operations, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors.

EOG's business strategy is to maximize the rate of return on investment of capital by controlling operating and capital costs and maximizing reserve recoveries.  Pursuant to this strategy, each prospective drilling location is evaluated by its estimated rate of return. This strategy is intended to enhance the generation of cash flow and earnings from each unit of production on a cost-effective basis, allowing EOG to deliver long-term production growth while maintaining a strong balance sheet.  EOG is focused on cost-effective utilization of advanced technology associated with three-dimensional seismic and microseismic data, the development of reservoir simulation models, the use of improved drill bits,drilling equipment, completion technologies for horizontal drilling and formation evaluation.  These advanced technologies are used, as appropriate, throughout EOG to reduce the risks and costs associated with all aspects of oil and gas exploration, development and exploitation.  EOG implements its strategy primarily by emphasizing the drilling of internally generated prospects in order to find and develop low-cost reserves.  Maintaining the lowest possible operating cost structure that is consistent with prudentefficient, safe and safeenvironmentally responsible operations is also an important goal in the implementation of EOG's strategy.

With respect to information on EOG's working interest in wells or acreage, "net" oil and gas wells or acreage are determined by multiplying "gross" oil and gas wells or acreage by EOG's working interest in the wells or acreage.

Business Segments

EOG's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related. For financial information about our reportable segments (including financial information by segment geographic area), see Note 11 to Consolidated Financial Statements. For information regarding the risks associated with EOG's foreign operations, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors.


Exploration and Production

United States Operations

EOG's operations are focusedlocated in most of the productive basins in the United States with a focus on crude oil and, to a lesser extent, liquids-rich natural gas plays.

At December 31, 2016,2018, on a crude oil equivalent basis, 56%53% of EOG's net proved reserves in the United States were crude oil and condensate, 20%21% were NGLs and 24%26% were natural gas. The majority of these reserves are in long-lived fields with well-established production characteristics. EOG believes that opportunities exist to increase production through continued development in and around many of these fields and through the utilization of applicable technologies. EOG also maintains an active exploration program designed to extend fields and add new trends and resource plays to its already broad portfolio.



The following is a summary of significant developments during 20162018 and certain 20172019 plans for EOG's United States operations.

2018 2019
Area of Operation
Crude Oil & Condensate Volumes
(MBbld) (1)
Natural Gas Liquids Volumes
(MBbld) (1)
Natural Gas Volumes
(MMcfd) (1)
Total Net Acres (2)
 Net Well Completions Expected Net Well Completions
         
Eagle Ford171
31
159
579,000
 304
 300
Austin Chalk20
7
42

(3) 
27
 15
Permian Basin132
46
338
913,000
 265
 275
Rocky Mountain Area62
15
207
1,232,000
 109
 95
Upper Gulf Coast1

4
441,000
 1
 5
Mid-Continent6
2
12
125,000
 31
 35
Fort Worth Basin2
14
78
152,000
 
 
South Texas1
1
24
391,000
 8
 5
Marcellus Shale

59
172,000
 15
 
(1)Thousand barrels per day or million cubic feet per day, as applicable.
(2)Total net acres excludes approximately 0.3 million net acres related to other areas.
(3)The Austin Chalk play encompasses the same net acres as the Eagle Ford.

The Eagle Ford continues to prove itself as a world-class crude oil field having produced in excess of 2.02.9 billion barrels of crude oil and condensate. With approximately 528,000516,000 of its 590,000579,000 total net acres in the prolific oil window, EOG continues to be the largest crude oil producer in the Eagle Ford with cumulative gross production in excess of 365490 MMBbl of crude oil.oil and condensate. In 2016,2018, EOG completed 236304 net Eagle Ford wells and also tested a newcontinued to test the Austin Chalk play concept with the completion of 1427 net Austin Chalk wells. EOG is still evaluating the extent of prospectivity of the Austin Chalk, which overlays the Eagle Ford. Net production from the Eagle Ford averaged approximately 166 thousand barrels per day (MBbld) of crude oil and condensate, 27 MBbld of NGLs and 161 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of natural gas. EOG also expandedcontinued its enhanced oil recovery (EOR) gas injection program within 2018, adding 54 wells to the implementation of a 32-well commercialization pilot which is showing favorable early results. In 2017,program. EOG does not expect to add wells to the EOR program in 2019 while it evaluates additional primary development opportunities. EOG expects to complete approximately 195300 net Eagle Ford wells and 2515 net Austin Chalk wells continuein 2019 while continuing to improve well productivity and reduce drilling and completion costs as well as operating expenses. In addition, based on encouraging results, EOG will continue to expand the implementation of the EOR gas injection program into additional areas.operational efficiencies. The combination of self-sourced sand, dedicated completions crewsexceptional execution and other services along with continuous well optimization programsoperational improvements have made this play a centerpieceone of the foundations of EOG's portfolio.

In the Permian Basin, EOG completed 92265 net wells during 2018, primarily in the Delaware Basin Wolfcamp Shale, Second Bone Spring and Leonard plays during 2016, and significantly increasedplays. EOG continued to consolidate its acreage position in each of these world-class assets. Inassets through small leasing transactions and the exchange of acreage with other nearby operators. EOG has approximately 346,000 net acres in the Delaware Basin Wolfcamp Shale play where it has approximately 346,000completed 219 net acres, EOG followed a development plan with well spacing as close as 660 feetwells in the crude oil portion and 880 feet in the combo portion.2018. The success of the 2016 Delaware Basin2018 Wolfcamp Shale program was due to precision targeting, high-density stimulations and continued cost reductions, and lateral length extensions.reductions. The average lateral lengthprogram shifted toward the development of completedlarger packages of wells in the Delaware Basin Wolfcamp Shale play increased from approximately 4,600 feet in 2015during 2018, which also contributed to approximately 5,200 feet in 2016.cost reductions. The high-return Delaware Basin Wolfcamp Shale play where EOG completed 71 net wells in 2016, will continue to be ana primary area of focus in 2017.2019. In the Second Bone Spring play, where itEOG holds approximately 289,000 net acres EOGand completed 1318 net wells. With over 1,800 estimated remaining net drilling locations, thewells in 2018. The Second Bone Spring play is another integral part of EOG's Permian Basin portfolio. In the Leonard Shale play, EOG has approximately 160,000 net acres and continued development with 17 net wells completed in 2016 with2018. EOG also had strong results in the First Bone Spring where it holds approximately 100,000 net acres and completed eight net wells completed. Net production in the Permian Basin for 2016 averaged approximately 47 MBbld of crude oil and condensate, and 16 MBbld of NGLs, an increase of 47% over 2015. Net natural gas production increased 29%2018. Activity in 2019 will continue to approximately 139 MMcfd. EOG holds approximately 630,000 net acres throughout the Permian Basin. In 2017, activity will be focused primarily in the Delaware Basin Wolfcamp Shale, Second Bone Spring, First Bone Spring and Leonard plays, where EOG expects to complete approximately 140270 net wells.

On October 4, 2016, EOG completed its previously announced merger and related asset purchase transactions with Yates Petroleum Corporation (YPC), Abo Petroleum Corporation (ABO), MYCO Industries, Inc. (MYCO), and certain affiliated entities (collectively with YPC, ABO and MYCO, the "Yates Entities"), thereby gaining a presence in Artesia, New Mexico. The Yates transaction added, among other acreage, highly-prospective core acreage of approximately 180,000 net acres in the Delaware Basin Core and approximately 200,000 net acres in the Powder River Basin that will be exploited by existing EOG operations. In 2017, EOG will be focused on fully integrating the existing Yates Entities personnel, exploring its approximate 130,000 net acres in the Permian Basin Northwest Shelf in New Mexico (acquired from the Yates Entities) and optimizing the legacy Yates net production of approximately 28,600 barrels of oil equivalent per day (Boed). In 2017, EOG plans to drill and complete approximately five net wells in the Permian Basin Northwest Shelf and assess the remaining 1.1 million net acres acquired from the Yates Entities in New Mexico, Wyoming, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, and Utah.





In 2016,Activity in the Rocky Mountain area experienced increased EOG activity, driven in large part by2018 with a focus on the completion of the majority of its drilled uncompleted wells (DUCs). This area also achieved significant reductions in lease operating expensesWyoming Powder River and capital costs while making gains in well productivity.DJ Basins. In the Powder River Basin, EOG successfully expanded development programs in both the Turneroperated a two-rig program, completing 41 net wells, and Parkman formations, completing 20 net wells. EOG increased its net acreage positionidentified future drilling locations, mostly in the Powder River Basin from approximately 376,000 net acres to approximately 572,000 net acres, largely driven by the Yates transaction. Given EOG's sizable acreage footprintMowry and improving well results, the Powder River BasinNiobrara formations. The focus in 2019 will be one focal point of EOG's 2017to add infrastructure and operate a drilling program to further delineate the basin and test additional targets, to better position the company for a more robust development program.program in 2020 and beyond. In 2016, EOGthe Wyoming DJ Basin, drilling, completion, and operating costs continued successful infill drillingto decline and there is a significant high-return development program scheduled for 2019. Drilling activity increased in the Williston Basin Bakken , completing 48in 2018 after pausing for several years while the company reduced its inventory of drilled uncompleted wells (DUCs). The 20 net wells including DUCs. Thecompleted in 2018 targeted the Bakken continues to produce superiorand Three Forks formations and benefited from the application of precision targeting. Activity in 2019 will be similar, as will the seasonal program of completing wells and EOG plans to continue development operations in this area in 2017. In the DJ Basin, EOG completed 30 net wells, including the majority of its DUCs drilled in 2014. Substantial reductions in capital costs, driven by drilling, completion, and facility design changes coupled with improvements in well productivity and formation targeting, have significantly increased the rates of return of future wellsmostly in the DJ Basin.summer while drilling operations are conducted throughout the year. EOG plans to continue development in the DJ Basin in 2017. Net production for the entire Rocky Mountain area for 2016 averaged approximately 48 MBbld of crude oil and condensate, 11 MBbld of NGLs and 154 MMcfd of natural gas. In 2017, EOG plans to complete approximately 80 net wells in the Rocky Mountain area. EOGcurrently holds approximately 1.71.2 million net acres in the Rocky Mountain area, an increase of approximately 880,000 from 2015 largely driven by the Yates transaction.area.

In the Upper Gulf Coast region,Mid-Continent area, EOG focusedcontinued its development of the Woodford Oil Window play with 26 net wells completed during 2018. EOG holds 47,000 net acres in the play and plans to build on portfolio enhancement through an active exploration, evaluation and disposition programits initial success in 2016. the Woodford Oil Window with 30 net well completions in 2019. In 2018, EOG completed 22 gross (four net) wells in the Western Anadarko Basin Marmaton Sand.

Total net production in 20162018 from the Upper Gulf CoastFort Worth Basin Barnett Shale and Marcellus Shale averaged approximately 2 MBbld of crude oil and condensate, 114 MBbld of NGLs and 34137 MMcfd of natural gas. InDevelopment activity in these areas was concentrated in the fourth quarterMarcellus Shale in 2018, where EOG completed 15 net DUCs. Net production in the Marcellus Shale for 2018 averaged 59 MMcfd of 2016, EOG divested all of its Haynesville natural gas, assets which included averagewith a peak net productionrate of 102 MMcfd. EOG currently holds approximately 30 MMcfd on 90,000172,000 net acres. Additional smaller asset sales occurred throughout the year. EOG completed seven net wells in 2016 and plans to complete approximately 10 net wells in 2017 in this region.acres with Marcellus potential. At year-end 2016,2018, EOG held approximately 370,000152,000 net acres in the Fort Worth Basin.

At year-end 2018, EOG held approximately 441,000 net acres in the Upper Gulf Coast region.

Similar to the Upper Gulf Coast region, the Mid-Continent area has been an area of active portfolio management. Total net production in 2016 from the Mid-Continent area averaged approximately 3 MBbld of crude oil EOG remained focused on exploration and condensate, 2 MBbld of NGLs and 21 MMcfd of natural gas. EOG held approximately 300,000 net acres throughout the Mid-Continent area at year-end 2016evaluation efforts last year with minimal activity and expects tothese efforts will continue its exploration program in 2017.

In the Fort Worth Basin, EOG divested all of its Barnett Shale natural gas assets in Johnson County, Texas, in the fourth quarter of 2016. Net production from the divested properties in 2016 was approximately 135 MMcfd of natural gas and 4 MBbld of NGLs, and included 85,000 net acres. EOG still operates a large liquids-rich Barnett Shale acreage position (Barnett Combo) located primarily in Montague and Cooke Counties. Daily average net production in the Barnett Shale was approximately 3 MBbld of crude oil and condensate, 22 MBbld of NGLs and 217 MMcfd of natural gas during 2016. EOG held approximately 234,000 net acres in the Fort Worth Basin as of year-end 2016.2019.

In the South Texas area, totalEOG completed eight net production during 2016 averaged approximately 2 MBbld of crude oil and condensate, 2 MBbld of NGLs and 42 MMcfd of natural gas. EOG drilled three netliquids-rich natural gas wells in 20162018, including three net DUCs from prior years. EOG has deferred completion of five additional net wells, and deferred additional completions until market conditions become more favorable. In 2017, EOG expects to complete approximately 10 netthese liquids-rich natural gas wells in 2019 in the Frio and Vicksburg trends, where it holds approximately 205,000391,000 net acres. ExplorationIn addition, exploration and evaluation efforts will continue in this region primarily focusing on liquids-rich exploration plays.

Net production in the Marcellus Shale for 2016 averaged approximately 17 MMcfd of natural gas. EOG currently holds approximately 210,000 net acres with Marcellus and Utica Shale potential. EOG plans to complete approximately five net wells in 2017.

EOG has agreements with certain crude oil refining companies to deliver an average of 46 MBbld of crude oil in 2017. EOG intends to fulfill these crude oil delivery obligations with its Eagle Ford production.2019.

At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG held approximately 2.22.4 million net undeveloped acres in the United States.

During 2016,2018, EOG continued to operate its gathering and processing activitiesfacilities in the Eagle Ford in South Texas, the Williston Basin Bakken and Three Forks plays in North Dakota, the Fort Worth Basin Barnett Shale and the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico. At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG-owned natural gas processing capacity in the Eagle Ford and the Fort Worth Basin Barnett Shale totaled 325 MMcfd and 180 MMcfd, respectively.

In 2016, EOG continued to own its crude oil facilities near Stanley, North Dakota, St. James, Louisiana, and Stroud, Oklahoma.



EOG operates its own sand mine and sand processing plants in Hood County, Texas, to reduce costs and to help fulfill EOG's sand needs for its well completion operations in Texas. Additionally, EOG owns a second Hood County sand processing plant, which processes sand sourced from the north Texas area, as needed.

In 2016, EOG continued to process sand from its Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, sand plant on an as-needed basis.

EOG operates three sand unloading facilities to support well completions in the Delaware Basin, Eagle Ford and the Williston Basin Bakken.

During 2016, EOG shipped the equivalent of 152 sand unit trains from various sources to support well completions in the Delaware Basin, Eagle Ford and other plays.

Operations Outside the United States

EOG has operations offshore Trinidad, in the U.K. East Irish Sea, in the China Sichuan Basin and in Canada and is evaluating additional exploration, development and exploitation opportunities in these and other select international areas. EOG sold its operations in the United Kingdom (U.K.) East Irish Sea in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Trinidad. EOG, through several of its subsidiaries, including EOG Resources Trinidad Limited,
holds an 80% working interest in the exploration and production license covering the South East Coast Consortium (SECC) Block offshore Trinidad, except in the Deep Ibis area in which EOG's working interest decreased as a result of a third-party farm-out agreement;
holds an 80% working interest in the exploration and production license covering the Pelican Field and its related facilities;
holds a 50% working interest in the exploration and production licenses covering the Sercan Area (formerly known as the EMZ Area) offshore Trinidad;
holds a 100% working interest in a production sharing contract with the Government of Trinidad and Tobago for each of the Modified U(a) Block, Modified U(b) Block and Block 4(a);
holds a 50% working interest in the exploration and production license covering the Banyan Field;
holds a 50% working interest in the exploration and production license covering the Ska, Mento, Reggae Area deep Teak, deep Saaman and deep Poui offshore Trinidad (collectively SMR Area);
owns a 12% equity interest in an anhydrous ammonia plant in Point Lisas, Trinidad, that is owned and operated by Caribbean Nitrogen Company Limited; and


owns a 10% equity interest in an anhydrous ammonia plant in Point Lisas, Trinidad, that is owned and operated by Nitrogen (2000) Unlimited.

Several fields in the SECC Block, Modified U(a) Block, Modified U(b) Block, Block 4(a), the Banyan Field and the Sercan Area have been developed and are producing natural gas and crude oil and condensate. Natural gas from EOG's Trinidad operations currently is sold under various contracts with the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited and its subsidiary (NGC). Crude oil and condensate from EOG's Trinidad operations currently is sold to the Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited (Petrotrin).and its successor, Heritage Petroleum Company Limited.  In 2016,2018, EOG's net production from Trinidad averaged approximately 340266 MMcfd of natural gas and approximately 0.8 MBbld of crude oil and condensate.

In 2016,2018, EOG installed a platform and pipelineconducted an ocean bottom nodal seismic survey in the Sercan AreaSECC Block and the Pelican Field and continues to process and review the initial data.
In 2019, EOG expects to drill five wells of which two of these wells are expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2019 and one well is expected to be completed in preparation for its three net well drilling program. In the fourth quarter of 2016, EOG drilled and completed one net well and began drilling a second well. EOG expects to bring the remaining two net wells of the Sercan program on-line in early 2017 and to drill an additional three net wells in the second half of 2017.

In 2017, it is anticipated that EOG's Trinidad operations will supply approximately 395 MMcfd (295 MMcfd, net) of natural gas from its existing proved reserves.2019. All of the natural gas produced from EOG's Trinidad operations in 20172019 is expected to be supplied to NGC under various contracts with NGC. All crude oil and condensate produced from EOG's Trinidad operations in 20172019 is expected to be supplied to PetrotrinHeritage Petroleum Company Limited under various contracts with Petrotrin.Heritage Petroleum Company Limited.

At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG held approximately 40,000115,000 net undeveloped acres in Trinidad.

United Kingdom. EOG's subsidiary,EOG completed the sale of all of its interest in EOG Resources United Kingdom Limited (EOGUK), owns a 25% non-operating working interest in a portionduring the fourth quarter of Block 49/16a, located2018. EOG no longer has any presence in the Southern Gas Basin of the North Sea. Production ceased at the end of the third quarter of 2015, and decommissioning is planned for the second half of 2017.U.K.



In 2007, EOGUK was awarded a license for two blocks in the East Irish Sea – Blocks 110/7b and 110/12a. In 2009, EOGUK drilled a successful oil exploratory well in the East Irish Sea Block 110/12a. EOG began production from its 100% working interest East Irish Sea Conwy crude oil project in March 2016. Modifications to the nearby third-party-owned Douglas platform, which is used to process Conwy production, were completed in the first quarter of 2016 and acceptance and performance testing is ongoing.

In 2016,2018, production averaged approximately 3.44.2 MBbld of crude oil, net, in the United Kingdom.

At December 31, 2016, EOG held approximately 4,000 net undeveloped acres in the United Kingdom.U.K.

China. In July 2008, EOG acquired rights from ConocoPhillips in a Petroleum Contract covering the Chuan Zhong Block exploration area in the Sichuan Basin, Sichuan Province, China. In October 2008, EOG obtained the rights to shallower zones on the acquired acreage. EOG entered 2018 with two DUCs and completed both wells. In addition, EOG drilled five natural gas wells and completed one of those wells in 2018 as part of the continuing development of the Bajiaochang Field, which natural gas is sold under a long-term contract to PetroChina. EOG plans to drill two additional wells in 2019 and complete fourthe remaining 2018 wells in 2017 in the Sichuan Basin, Sichuan Province, China.progress as pipeline capacity allows.

In 2016,2018, production averaged approximately 1523 MMcfd of natural gas, net, in China.

Canada. EOG sold all of its assets in Manitoba and the majority of its assets in Alberta in two separate transactions that closed on or about December 1, 2014. EOG divested 1.3 million grossmaintains approximately 134,000 net acres (1.1 million net), 97 percent of which were in Alberta. Of the approximate 5,800with 23 net producing wells sold, 5,155 wells were natural gas. in the Horn River area in Northeast British Columbia.

In 2016,2018, net production in Canada averaged approximately 108 MMcfd of natural gas.

Argentina. EOG's investment in Argentina was sold during the third quarter of 2016.

EOG continues to evaluate other select crude oil and natural gas opportunities outside the United States, primarily by pursuing exploitation opportunities in countries where indigenous crude oil and natural gas reserves have been identified.



Marketing

In 2016,2018, EOG's wellhead crude oil and condensate production was sold into local markets or transported either by pipeline or truck to downstream markets or sold into local markets. In each case, the price received was based on market prices at that specific sales point or based on the price index applicable for that location. Major U.S. sales areas included the Midwest,Midwest; the Permian Basin,Basin; Cushing, Oklahoma, Louisiana,Oklahoma; Houston and Corpus Christi, Texas; and Louisiana; and other points along the U.S. Gulf Coast. In 2017,2019, the pricing mechanism for such production is expected to remain the same. At December 31, 2018, EOG is committed to deliver fixed quantities of crude oil of 69.9 MMBbls in 2019, 13.7 MMBbls in 2020 and 1.4 MMBbls in 2021, all of which is expected to be delivered from future production of available reserves.

In 2016,2018, EOG processed certain of its natural gas production, either at EOG-owned facilities or at third-party facilities, extracting NGLs. NGLs were sold at prevailing market prices. In 2017,2019, the pricing mechanism for such production is expected to remain the same.

In 2016,2018, EOG's United States wellhead natural gas production was sold into local markets or transported by pipeline to downstream markets.Katy, Texas; East Texas; the Cheyenne Hub; Southern California; or Chicago, Illinois. Pricing was based on the spot market price at the ultimate sales point. In 2017,2019, the pricing mechanism for such production is expected to remain the same. At December 31, 2018, EOG is committed to deliver fixed quantities of natural gas of 64 Bcf in 2019, 15 Bcf in 2020, 10 Bcf in 2021, 2 Bcf in 2022 and 11 Bcf thereafter, all of which is expected to be delivered from future production of available reserves.
 
In 2016,2018, a large majority of the wellhead natural gas volumes from Trinidad were sold under contracts with prices which were either wholly or partially dependent on Caribbean ammonia index prices and/or methanol prices. The remaining volumes were sold under a contract at prices partially dependent on United States Henry Hub market prices.prices and a fixed price contract. The pricing mechanisms for these contracts in Trinidad are expected to remain the same in 2017.2019.

In December 2014, EOG put in place arrangements to market and sell its U.K. wellhead crude oil production from the Conwy field, which commenced production in March 2016. The crude oil sales are based on a Dated Brent price or other market prices, as applicable.

In 2016,2018, all wellhead natural gas volumes from China were sold at regulated prices based on the purchaser's pipeline sales volumes to various local market segments. The pricing mechanism for production in China is expected to remain the same in 2017.2019.

Through November 2018, EOG marketed and sold its U.K. wellhead crude oil production from the Conwy field. The crude oil sales were based on a Dated Brent price or other market prices, as applicable.

In certain instances, EOG purchases and sells third-party crude oil and natural gas in order to balance firm transportation capacity with production in certain areas and to utilize excess capacity at EOG-owned facilities.



During 2016, three2018, two purchasers each accounted for more than 10% of EOG's total wellhead crude oil and condensate, NGL and natural gas revenues and gathering, processing and marketing revenues. All threeThe two purchasers are in the crude oil refining industry. EOG does not believe that the loss of any single purchaser would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.



Wellhead Volumes and Prices

The following table sets forth certain information regarding EOG's wellhead volumes of, and average prices for, crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas. The table also presents crude oil equivalent volumes which are determined using a ratio of 1.0 barrel of crude oil and condensate or NGLs to 6.0 Mcf of natural gas for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014.2016. See ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations, for wellhead volumes on a per-day basis.
Year Ended December 312016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Crude Oil and Condensate Volumes (MMBbl) (1)
          
United States:          
Eagle Ford60.7
 66.3
 65.0
62.4
 57.4
 60.7
Delaware Basin17.0
 9.8
 5.1
46.3
 31.6
 17.0
Other24.2
 27.3
 32.8
35.4
 33.2
 24.2
United States101.9
 103.4
 102.9
144.1
 122.2
 101.9
Trinidad0.3
 0.3
 0.3
0.3
 0.3
 0.3
Other International (2)
1.2
 0.1
 2.2
1.6
 0.2
 1.2
Total103.4
 103.8
 105.4
146.0
 122.7
 103.4
Natural Gas Liquids Volumes (MMBbl) (1)
 
  
  
   
  
United States: 
  
  
   
  
Eagle Ford10.0
 9.9
 9.0
11.4
 9.4
 10.0
Delaware Basin5.8
 3.1
 2.0
15.8
 8.8
 5.8
Other14.1
 15.1
 18.1
15.3
 14.1
 14.1
United States29.9
 28.1
 29.1
42.5
 32.3
 29.9
Other International (2)

 
 0.2

 
 
Total29.9
 28.1
 29.3
42.5
 32.3
 29.9
Natural Gas Volumes (Bcf) (1)
 
  
   
  
  
United States: 
  
     
  
Eagle Ford59
 65
 60
58
 55
 59
Delaware Basin50
 27
 17
110
 81
 50
Other187
 231
 259
169
 143
 187
United States296
 323
 336
337
 279
 296
Trinidad125
 127
 132
97
 114
 125
Other International (2)
9
 12
 26
11
 9
 9
Total430
 462
 494
445
 402
 430
Crude Oil Equivalent Volumes (MMBoe) (3)
 
  
   
  
  
United States: 
  
   
  
  
Eagle Ford80.6
 87.1
 84.0
83.5
 76.0
 80.6
Delaware Basin31.2
 17.4
 9.9
80.3
 53.9
 31.2
Other69.3
 80.9
 94.1
78.8
 71.2
 69.3
United States181.1
 185.4
 188.0
242.6
 201.1
 181.1
Trinidad21.1
 21.6
 22.4
16.5
 19.4
 21.1
Other International (2)
2.8
 1.9
 6.7
3.4
 1.8
 2.8
Total205.0
 208.9
 217.1
262.5
 222.3
 205.0




Year Ended December 312016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Average Crude Oil and Condensate Prices ($/Bbl) (4)
          
United States$41.84
 $47.55
 $92.73
$65.16
 $50.91
 $41.84
Trinidad33.76
 39.51
 84.63
57.26
 42.30
 33.76
Other International (2)
36.72
 57.32
 86.75
71.45
 57.20
 36.72
Composite41.76
 47.53
 92.58
65.21
 50.91
 41.76
Average Natural Gas Liquids Prices ($/Bbl) (4)
     
     
United States$14.63
 $14.50
 $31.84
$26.60
 $22.61
 $14.63
Other International (2)

 4.61
 40.73

 
 
Composite14.63
 14.49
 31.91
26.60
 22.61
 14.63
Average Natural Gas Prices ($/Mcf) (4)
     
     
United States$1.60
 $1.97
 $3.93
$2.88
 $2.20
 $1.60
Trinidad1.88
 2.89
 3.65
2.94
 2.38
 1.88
Other International (2)
3.64
 5.05
 4.40
4.08
 3.89
 3.64
Composite1.73
 2.30
 3.88
2.92
(5)2.29
 1.73
 
(1)Million barrels or billion cubic feet, as applicable.
(2)Other International includes EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(3)Million barrels of oil equivalent; includes crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas. 
(4)Dollars per barrel or per thousand cubic feet, as applicable.  Excludes the impact of financial commodity derivative instruments (see Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements).
(5)Includes a positive revenue adjustment of $0.44 per Mcf related to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts with Customers" (ASU 2014-09) (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, EOG presents natural gas processing fees related to certain processing and marketing agreements as Gathering and Processing Costs, instead of as a deduction to Natural Gas revenues.

Competition

EOG competes with major integrated oil and gas companies, government-affiliated oil and gas companies and other independent oil and gas companies for the acquisition of licenses and leases, properties and reserves and access to the facilities, equipment, materials, services, and employees and other contract personnel (including geologists, geophysicists, engineers and other specialists) required to explore for, develop, produce, market and transport crude oil and natural gas. In addition, certain of EOG's competitors have financial and other resources substantially greater than those EOG possesses and have established strategic long-term positions andor strong governmental relationships in countries or areas in which EOG may seek new or expanded entry. As a consequence, EOG may be at a competitive disadvantage in certain respects, such as in bidding for drilling rights or in accessing necessary services, facilities, equipment, materials and personnel. In addition, EOG's larger competitors may have a competitive advantage when responding to factors that affect demand for crude oil and natural gas, such as changing worldwide prices and levels of production and the cost and availability of alternative fuels. EOG also faces competition, to a lesser extent, from competing energy sources, such as alternative energy sources.


Regulation

United States Regulation of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production.Crude oil and natural gas production operations are subject to various types of regulation, including regulation in the United States by federal and state agencies.

United States legislation affecting the oil and gas industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion. In addition, numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue, and have issued, rules and regulations applicable to the oil and gas industry. Such rules and regulations, among other things, require permits for the drilling of wells, regulate the spacing of wells, prevent the waste of natural gas through restrictions on flaring, require surety bonds for various exploration and production operations and regulate the calculation and disbursement of royalty payments (for federal and state leases), production taxes and ad valorem taxes.



A portion of EOG's oil and gas leases in New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as in other areas, are granted by the federal government and administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and/or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) or, in the case of offshore leases (which, for EOG, are de minimis), by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), all federal agencies. Operations conducted by EOG on federal oil and gas leases must comply with numerous additional statutory and regulatory restrictions and, in the case of leases relating to tribal lands, certain tribal environmental and permitting requirements and employment rights regulations. In addition, the U.S. Department of the Interior (via various of its agencies, including the BLM, the BIA and the Office of Natural Resources Revenue) has certain authority over our calculation and payment of royalties, bonuses, fines, penalties, assessments and other revenues related to our federal and tribal oil and gas leases.

BLM, BIA and BOEM leases contain relatively standardized terms requiring compliance with detailed regulations and, in the case of offshore leases, orders pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (which are subject to change by the BOEM or BSEE). Under certain circumstances, the BLM, BIA, BOEM or BSEE (as applicable) may require operations on federal leases to be suspended or terminated. Any such suspension or termination could materially and adversely affect EOG's interests.

The transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce are regulated pursuant to the Natural Gas Act of 1938, as amended (NGA), and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. These statutes are administered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Effective January 1993, the Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989 deregulated natural gas prices for all "first sales" of natural gas, which includes all sales by EOG of its own production. All other sales of natural gas by EOG, such as those of natural gas purchased from third parties, remain jurisdictional sales subject to a blanket sales certificate under the NGA, which has flexible terms and conditions. Consequently, all of EOG's sales of natural gas currently may be made at market prices, subject to applicable contract provisions. EOG's jurisdictional sales, however, may be subject in the future to greater federal oversight, including the possibility that the FERC might prospectively impose more restrictive conditions on such sales. Conversely, sales of crude oil and condensate and NGLs by EOG are made at unregulated market prices.

EOG owns certain gathering and/or processing facilities in the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico, the Barnett Shale in North Texas, the Bakken and Three Forks plays in North Dakota, and the Eagle Ford in South Texas. State regulation of gathering and processing facilities generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscrimination requirements with respect to the provision of gathering and processing services, but does not generally entail rate regulation. EOG's gathering and processing operations could be materially and adversely affected should they be subject in the future to the application of state or federal regulation of rates and services.

EOG's gathering and processing operations also may be, or become, subject to safety and operational regulations relating to the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of such facilities. Additional rules and legislation pertaining to these matters are considered and/or adopted from time to time. Although EOG cannot predict what effect, if any, such legislation might have on its operations and financial condition, EOG could be required to incur additional capital expenditures and increased compliance and operating costs depending on the nature and extent of such future legislative and regulatory changes.

EOG also owns crude oil rail loading facilities in North Dakota crude oil rail unloading facilities in Oklahoma and Louisiana, and crude oil truck unloading facilities in certain of its U.S. plays. Regulation of such facilities is conducted at the state and federal levels and generally includes various safety, environmental, permitting and packaging/labeling requirements. Additional regulation pertaining to these matters is considered and/or adopted from time to time. Although EOG cannot predict what effect, if any, any such new regulations might have on its crude-by-rail operationsassets and the transportation of its crude oil production by truck, EOG could be required to incur additional capital expenditures and increased compliance and operating costs depending on the nature and extent of such future regulatory changes. EOG did not transport any crude oil by rail during 2016.2018.

Proposals and proceedings that might affect the oil and gas industry are considered from time to time by Congress, the state legislatures, the FERC and federal, state and local regulatory commissions, agencies, councils and courts. EOG cannot predict when or whether any such proposals or proceedings may become effective. It should also be noted that the oil and gas industry historically has been very heavily regulated; therefore, there is no assurance that the approach currently being followed by such legislative bodies and regulatory commissions, agencies, councils and courts will remain unchanged.



Environmental Regulation - United States.EOG is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations covering the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations affect EOG's operations and costs as a result of their effect on crude oil and natural gas exploration, development and production operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, including the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of investigatory and remedial obligations, the suspension or revocation of necessary permits, licenses and authorizations, the requirement that additional pollution controls be installed and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations or imposing additional compliance requirements.

In addition, EOG has acquired certain oil and gas properties from third parties whose actions with respect to the management and disposal or release of hydrocarbons or other wastes were not under EOG's control. Under environmental laws and regulations, EOG could be required to remove or remediate wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators. EOG also could incur costs related to the clean-up of third-party sites to which it sent regulated substances for disposal or to which it sent equipment for cleaning, and for damages to natural resources or other claims related to releases of regulated substances at such third-party sites. In addition, EOG could be responsible under environmental laws and regulations for oil and gas properties in which EOG previously owned or currently owns an interest, but was or is not the operator. Moreover, EOG is subject to the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) rule requiring annual reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and, as discussed further below, is also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing.

Compliance with environmental laws and regulations increases EOG's overall cost of business, but has not had, to date, a material adverse effect on EOG's operations, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, it is not anticipated, based on current laws and regulations, that EOG will be required in the near future to expend amounts (whether for environmental control facilities or otherwise) that are material in relation to its total exploration and development expenditure program in order to comply with such laws and regulations. However, given that such laws and regulations are subject to change, EOG is unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the ultimate effect on EOG's operations, financial condition and results of operations.

Climate Change - United StatesStates.. Local, state, nationalfederal and international regulatory bodies have been increasingly focused on GHG emissions and climate change issues.issues in recent years. In addition to the U.S. EPA's rule requiring annual reporting of GHG emissions, the U.S. EPA has adopted regulations for certain large sources regulating GHG emissions as pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act. Also,In May 2016, the U.S. EPA issued regulations that require operators to reduce methane emissions and emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from new, modified and reconstructed crude oil and natural gas wells and equipment located at natural gas production gathering and booster stations, gas processing plants and natural gas transmission compressor stations.

At the international level, in December 2015, the U.S. participated in the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France. The Paris Agreement (adopted at the conference) calls for nations to undertake efforts with respect to global temperatures and GHG emissions. The Paris Agreement went into effect on November 4, 2016. It remains unclear whetherHowever, the U.S. has announced its intention to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In response, many state and howlocal officials have stated their intent to intensify efforts to uphold the results ofcommitments set forth in the 2016 U.S. election could impact the regulation of GHG emissions at the federal and state level.international accord.

EOG believes that its strategy to reduce GHG emissions throughout its operations is both in the best interest of the environment and is a generally goodprudent business practice. EOG has developed a system that is utilized in calculating GHG emissions from its operating facilities. This emissions management system calculates emissions based on recognized regulatory methodologies, where applicable, and on commonly accepted engineering practices. EOG reports GHG emissions for facilities covered under the U.S. EPA's Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule published in 2009.2009, as amended.

EOG is unable to predict the timing, scope and effect of any currently proposed or future investigations, laws, regulations or treaties regarding climate change and GHG emissions, but the direct and indirect costs of such investigations, laws, regulations and treaties (if enacted) could materially and adversely affect EOG's operations, financial condition and results of operations.



Hydraulic Fracturing - United StatesStates.. Most onshore crude oil and natural gas wells drilled by EOG are completed and stimulated through the use of hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing technology, which has been used by the oil and gas industry for more than 60 years and is constantly being enhanced, enables EOG to produce crude oil and natural gas from formations that otherwise would not be recovered. Specifically, hydraulic fracturing is a process in which pressurized fluid is pumped into underground formations to create tiny fractures or spaces that allow crude oil and natural gas to flow from the reservoir into the well so that it can be brought to the surface. Hydraulic fracturing generally takes place thousands of feet underground, a considerable distance below any drinking water aquifers, and there are impermeable layers of rock between the area fractured and the water aquifers. The makeup of the fluid used in the hydraulic fracturing process is typically more than 99%includes water and sand, and less than 1% of highly diluted chemical additives; lists of the chemical additives most typically used in fracturing fluids are available to the public via internet websites and in other publications sponsored by industry trade associations and through state agencies in those states that require the reporting of the components of fracturing fluids. While the majority of the sand remains underground to hold open the fractures, a significant percentageamount of the water and chemical additives flow back and are then either reused or safely disposed of at sites that are approved and permitted by the appropriate regulatory authorities. EOG regularlyperiodically conducts auditsregulatory assessments of these disposal facilities to monitor compliance with applicable regulations.


    
The regulation of hydraulic fracturing is primarily conducted at the state and local level through permitting and other compliance requirements. In April 2012, however, the U.S. EPA issued regulations specifically applicable to the oil and gas industry that require operators to significantly reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC)VOC emissions from natural gas wells that are hydraulically fractured through the use of "green completions" to capture natural gas that would otherwise escape into the air. The U.S. EPA also issued regulations that establish standards for VOC emissions from several types of equipment, including storage tanks, compressors, dehydrators, and valves and sweetening units at gas processing plants. In addition, in May 2016, the U.S. EPA issued regulations that require operators to reduce methane and VOC emissions from new, modified and reconstructed crude oil and natural gas wells and equipment located at natural gas production gathering and booster stations, gas processing plants and natural gas transmission compressor stations.

In March 2015, the BLM issued new regulations applicable to hydraulic fracturing activities on federal and Indian lands, including requirements for chemical disclosure, wellbore integrity and handling of flowback and produced water. Those regulations were set aside by a federal district court in June 2016, but are on appeal to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition, in November 2016, the BLM issued a final rule that limits venting, flaring and leaking of natural gas from oil and gas wells and equipment on federal and Indian lands.lands, though, in September 2018, the BLM issued a final rule rescinding certain requirements of that rule. There have been various other proposals to regulate hydraulic fracturing at the federal level. Any new federal regulations that may be imposed on hydraulic fracturing could result in additional permitting and disclosure requirements, additional operating and compliance costs and additional operating restrictions.

In addition to these federal regulations, some state and local governments have imposed or have considered imposing various conditions and restrictions on drilling and completion operations, including requirements regarding casing and cementing of wells; testing of nearby water wells; restrictions on access to, and usage of, water; disclosure of the chemical additives used in hydraulic fracturing operations; and restrictions on the type of chemical additives that may be used in hydraulic fracturing operations.operations; and restrictions on drilling or injection activities on certain lands lying within wilderness wetlands, ecologically or seismically sensitive areas, and other protected areas. Such federal, state and local permitting and disclosure requirements and operating restrictions and conditions could lead to operational delays and increased operating and compliance costs and, moreover, could delay or effectively prevent the development of crude oil and natural gas from formations which would not be economically viable without the use of hydraulic fracturing.

EOG is unable to predict the timing, scope and effect of any currently proposed or future laws or regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing in the United States, but the direct and indirect costs of such laws and regulations (if enacted) could materially and adversely affect EOG's operations, financial condition and results of operations.

Other International Regulation.EOG's exploration and production operations outside the United States are subject to various types of regulations, including environmental regulations, imposed by the respective governments of the countries in which EOG's operations are conducted, and may affect EOG's operations and costs of compliance within those countries. EOG currently has operations in Trinidad, theChina and Canada (as earlier discussed, EOG sold its United Kingdom China and Canada.operations in the fourth quarter of 2018). EOG is unable to predict the timing, scope and effect of any currently proposed or future laws, regulations or treaties, including those regarding climate change and hydraulic fracturing, but the direct and indirect costs of such laws, regulations and treaties (if enacted) could materially and adversely affect EOG's operations, financial condition and results of operations. EOG will continue to review the risks to its business and operations associated with all environmental matters, including climate change and hydraulic fracturing regulation. In addition, EOG will continue to monitor and assess any new policies, legislation, regulations and treaties in the areas where it operates to determine the impact on its operations and take appropriate actions, where necessary.



Other Regulation. EOG has sand mining and processing operations in Texas and Wisconsin, which support EOG's exploration and development operations. EOG's sand mining operations are subject to regulation by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (in respect of safety and health matters) and by state agencies (in respect of air permitting and other environmental matters). The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95 to this report.



Other Matters

Energy Prices. EOG is a crude oil and natural gas producer and is impacted by changes in prices of crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas. Consistent with EOG's 2015 production, crude oil and condensate and NGL production comprised a larger portion of EOG's production mix in 2016 than in historical prior years. Average crude oil and condensate prices received by EOG for production in the United States increased 28% in 2018 and 22% in 2017 and decreased 12% in 2016, 49% in 2015 and 11% in 2014, each as compared to the immediately preceding year. Average NGL prices received by EOG for production in the United States increased 18% in 2018, 55% in 2017, and 1% in 2016, and decreased 54% in 2015 and 2% in 2014, each as compared to the immediately preceding year. During the last three years, average United States wellhead natural gas prices have fluctuated, at times rather dramatically. These fluctuations resulted in a 19% decrease31% increase in the average wellhead natural gas price received by EOG for production in the United States in 2016,2018 (inclusive of a 50%positive revenue adjustment of $0.44 per Mcf related to the adoption of ASU 2014-09), a 38% increase in 2017 and a 19% decrease in 2015 and an 18% increase in 2014,2016, each as compared to the immediately preceding year.

Due to the many uncertainties associated with the world political and economic environment (for example, the actions of other crude oil exporting nations, including the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries), the global supply of, and demand for, crude oil, NGLs and natural gas and the availability of other energy supplies, the relative competitive relationships of the various energy sources in the view of consumers and other factors, EOG is unable to predict what changes may occur in prices of crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas in the future. For additional discussion regarding changes in crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas prices and the risks that such changes may present to EOG, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors.

Including the impact of EOG's 2017 crude oil derivative contracts (exclusive of options) and basedBased on EOG's tax position, EOG's price sensitivity (exclusive of basis swaps) in 20172019 for each $1.00 per barrel increase or decrease in wellhead crude oil and condensate price, combined with the estimated change in NGL price, is approximately $77$133 million for net income and $96$173 million for pretax cash flows from operating activities. Including the impact of EOG's 2017 natural gas derivative contracts (exclusive of options) and basedBased on EOG's tax position and the portion of EOG's anticipated natural gas volumes for 20172019 for which prices have not been determined under long-term marketing contracts, EOG's price sensitivity for each $0.10 per Mcf increase or decrease in wellhead natural gas price is approximately $12$29 million for net income and $15$37 million for pretax cash flows from operating activities. For a summary of EOG's financial commodity derivative contracts through February 20, 2017,19, 2019, see ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Capital Resources and Liquidity - Derivative Transactions. For a summary of EOG's financial commodity derivative contracts for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016,2018, see Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Risk Management. EOG engages in price risk management activities from time to time. These activities are intended to manage EOG's exposure to fluctuations in prices of crude oil and natural gas. EOG utilizes financial commodity derivative instruments, primarily price swap, option, swaption, collar and basis swap contracts, as a means to manage this price risk. See Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements. For a summary of EOG's financial commodity derivative contracts through February 20, 2017,19, 2019, see ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Capital Resources and Liquidity - Derivative Transactions.

All of EOG's crude oil and natural gas activities are subject to the risks normally incident to the exploration for, and development, production and transportation of, crude oil and natural gas, including rig and well explosions, cratering, fires, loss of well control and leaks and spills, each of which could result in damage to life, property and/or the environment. EOG's operations are also subject to certain perils, including hurricanes, flooding and other adverse weather conditions.events. Moreover, EOG's activities are subject to governmental regulations as well as interruption or termination by governmental authorities based on environmental and other considerations. Losses and liabilities arising from such events could reduce revenues and increase costs to EOG to the extent not covered by insurance.



Insurance is maintained by EOG against some, but not all, of these risks in accordance with what EOG believes are customary industry practices and in amounts and at costs that EOG believes to be prudent and commercially practicable. Specifically, EOG maintains commercial general liability and excess liability coverage provided by third-party insurers for bodily injury or death claims resulting from an incident involving EOG's operations (subject to policy terms and conditions). Moreover, in the event an incident involving EOG's operations results in negative environmental effects, EOG maintains operators extra expense coverage provided by third-party insurers for obligations, expenses or claims that EOG may incur from such an incident, including obligations, expenses or claims in respect of seepage and pollution, cleanup and containment, evacuation expenses and control of the well (subject to policy terms and conditions). In the event of a well control incident resulting in negative environmental effects, such operators extra expense coverage would be EOG's primary coverage, with the commercial general liability and excess liability coverage referenced above also providing certain coverage to EOG. All of EOG's drilling activities are conducted on a contractual basis with independent drilling contractors and other third-party service contractors. The indemnification and other risk allocation provisions included in such contracts are negotiated on a contract-by-contract basis and are each based on the particular circumstances of the services being provided and the anticipated operations.



In addition to the above-described risks, EOG's operations outside the United States are subject to certain risks, including the risk of increases in taxes and governmental royalties, changes in laws and policies governing the operations of foreign-based companies, expropriation of assets, unilateral or forced renegotiation or modification of existing contracts with governmental entities, currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations. Please refer to ITEM 1A, Risk Factors, for further discussion of the risks to which EOG is subject with respect to its operations outside the United States.

Texas Severance Tax Rate Reduction. Natural gas production from qualifying Texas natural gas wells spudded or completed after August 31, 1996 is entitled to a reduced severance tax rate for the first 120 consecutive months of production. However, the cumulative value of the tax reduction cannot exceed 50 percent of the drilling and completion costs incurred on a well-by-well basis.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The current executive officers of EOG and their names and ages (as of February 27, 2017)26, 2019) are as follows:
Name Age Position
     
William R. Thomas 6466 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
     
Gary L. ThomasLloyd W. Helms, Jr. 6761 President and Chief Operating Officer
     
LloydKenneth W. Helms, Jr.Boedeker 5956 Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production
     
David W. TriceEzra Y. Yacob 4642 Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production
     
Timothy K. Driggers 5557 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
     
Michael P. Donaldson 5456 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

William R. Thomas was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer effective January 2014. He was elected Senior Vice President and General Manager of EOG's Fort Worth, Texas, office in June 2004, Executive Vice President and General Manager of EOG's Fort Worth, Texas, office in February 2007 and Senior Executive Vice President, Exploitation in February 2011. He subsequently served as Senior Executive Vice President, Exploration from July 2011 to September 2011, as President from September 2011 to July 2013 and as President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2013 to December 2013. Mr. Thomas joined a predecessor of EOG in January 1979. Mr. Thomas is EOG's principal executive officer.

Gary L. ThomasLloyd W. Helms, Jr. was elected Chief Operating Officer in September 2011 and President in March 2015. He was elected Executive Vice President, North America Operations in May 1998, Executive Vice President, Operations in May 2002, andDecember 2017. Prior to that, he served as Senior Executive Vice President, Operations from February 2007 to September 2011. He also previously served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of EOG's Midland, Texas, office. Mr. Thomas joined a predecessor of EOG in July 1978.

Lloyd W. Helms, Jr. was elected Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production infrom August 2013.2013 to December 2017. He was elected Vice President, Engineering and Acquisitions in September 2006, Vice President and General Manager of EOG's Calgary, Alberta, Canada office in March 2008, and served as Executive Vice President, Operations from February 2012 to August 2013. Mr. Helms joined a predecessor of EOG in February 1981.

David

Kenneth W. TriceBoedeker was elected Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production in August 2013.December 2018.  He served as Vice President and General Manager of EOG's Fort Worth,Denver, Colorado, office from October 2016 to December 2018, and as Vice President, Engineering and Acquisitions from July 2015 to October 2016.  Prior to that, Mr. Boedeker held technical and managerial positions of increasing responsibility across multiple offices and functional areas within EOG.  Mr. Boedeker joined EOG in July 1994.

Ezra Y. Yacob was elected Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production in December 2017. He served as Vice President and General Manager of EOG's Midland, Texas, office from May 20102014 to August 2013.December 2017. Prior to that, he served as Manager, Division Exploration in EOG's Fort Worth, Texas, and Midland, Texas, offices from March 2012 to May 2014 as well as in various geologicalgeoscience and management positions at EOG.leadership positions. Mr. TriceYacob joined EOG in November 1999.


August 2005.

Timothy K. Driggers was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2016. Previously, Mr. Driggers served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 2007 to April 2016. He was elected Vice President and Controller of EOG in October 1999, was subsequently named Vice President, Accounting and Land Administration in October 2000 and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in August 2003. Mr. Driggers is EOG's principal financial officer. Mr. Driggers joined a predecessor of EOG in August 1995.

Michael P. Donaldson was elected Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in April 2016. Previously, Mr. Donaldson served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from May 2012 to April 2016. He was elected Corporate Secretary in May 2008, and was appointed Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in July 2010. Mr. Donaldson joined EOG in September 2007.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Our business and operations are subject to many risks. The risks described below may not be the only risks we face, as our business and operations may also be subject to risks that we do not yet know of, or that we currently believe are immaterial. If any of the events or circumstances described below actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common stock could decline. The following risk factors should be read in conjunction with the other information contained herein, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Unless the context requires otherwise, "we," "us," "our" and "EOG" refer to EOG Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices are volatile, and thea substantial and extended decline in commodity prices has had, and may continue tocan have a material and adverse effect on us.

Prices for crude oil and natural gas (including prices for natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate) fluctuate widely. Among the interrelated factors that can or could cause these price fluctuations are:

domestic and worldwide supplies of crude oil, NGLs and natural gas;
domestic and international drilling activity;
the actions of other crude oil producing and exporting nations, including the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries;
domesticconsumer and international drilling activity;
the price and quantity of imported and exportedindustrial/commercial demand for crude oil, NGLsnatural gas and natural gas;
the level of consumer demand;
weather conditions and changes in weather patterns;
the availability, proximity and capacity of appropriate transportation facilities, gathering, processing and compression facilities and refining facilities;NGLs;
worldwide economic conditions, geopolitical factors and political conditions, including, but not limited to, the imposition of tariffs or trade or other economic sanctions, political instability or armed conflict in oil and gas producing regions;
the availability, proximity and capacity of appropriate transportation, gathering, processing, compression, storage and refining facilities;
the price and availability of, and demand for, competing energy sources, including alternative energy sources;
the effect of worldwide energy conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and climate change-related initiatives;
the nature and extent of governmental regulation, including environmental and other climate change-related regulation, regulation of derivatives transactions and hedging activities, tax laws and regulations and laws and regulations with respect to the import and export of crude oil, natural gas and related commodities;
the level and effect of trading in commodity futures markets, including trading by commodity price speculators and others; and
the effect of worldwide energy conservation measuresweather conditions and alternative fuel requirements.changes in weather patterns.

Governmental actions may also affect crude oil, natural gas, and NGL prices. It is uncertain what impact the election of the new administration and the new Congress will have on the exploration for, and production of, crude oil, natural gas and NGLs.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014 and continuing through 2016, crude oil prices substantially declined. In addition, natural gas and NGL prices began to decline substantially in the second quarter of 2014 and such lower prices continued through 2016. While crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices improved significantly during 2016. The2017 and 2018, the above-described factors and the volatility of commodity prices make it difficult to predict future crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2018, there was a substantial decline in the prices for crude oil and NGLs, whereas natural gas prices increased significantly during such period. As a result, we cannot predict how long these lower prices will continue and, while commodity prices increased somewhat during 2016 from 2014 and 2015 levels, there can be no assurance of further and/or sustained price increases or that the prices for crude oil, natural gas and/or NGLs will sustain, or increase from, their current levels and not again decline.

Our cash flows and results of operations depend to a great extent on prevailing commodity prices. Accordingly, substantial and extended declines in commodity prices can materially and adversely affect the amount of cash flows we have available for our capital expenditures and other operating expenses, our ability tothe terms on which we can access the credit and capital markets and our results of operations.


Lower commodity prices can also reduce the amount of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs that we can produce economically. Substantial and extended declines in the prices of these commodities can render uneconomic a significant portion of our exploration, development and exploitation projects, resulting in our having to make significant downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves. As a result, prolonged or substantial declines in commodity prices can materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance our capital expenditures and, in turn, the trading price of our common stock.

In addition, significant prolonged decreases in commodity prices may cause the expected future cash flows from our properties to fall below their respective net book values, which will require us to write down the value of our properties. Such reserve write-downs and asset impairments could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.position and, in turn, the trading price of our common stock.

In fact, the substantial declines in crude oil, natural gas, and NGL prices that began in 2014 and continued in 2015 and intothrough 2016 materially and adversely affected the amount of cash flows we had available for our capital expenditures and other operating expenses and our results of operations during fiscal years 2015 and 2016. Such declines also adversely affected the trading price of our common stock.

If commodity prices decline from current levels for an extended period of time, our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations will be adversely affected and we may be limited in our ability to maintain our current level of dividends on our common stock. In addition, we may be required to incur impairment charges and/or make significant additional downward adjustments to our proved reserve estimates. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations willand the trading price of our common stock may be further adversely affected.

Drilling crude oil and natural gas wells is a high-risk activity and subjects us to a variety of risks that we cannot control.

Drilling crude oil and natural gas wells, including development wells, involves numerous risks, including the risk that we may not encounter commercially productive crude oil and natural gas reserves (including "dry holes"). As a result, we may not recover all or any portion of our investment in new wells.

Specifically, we often are uncertain as to the future cost or timing of drilling, completing and operating wells, and our drilling operations and those of our third-party operators may be curtailed, delayed or canceled, the cost of such operations may increase and/or our results of operations and cash flows from such operations may be impacted, as a result of a variety of factors, including:

unexpected drilling conditions;
title problems;
pressure or irregularities in formations;
equipment failures or accidents;
adverse weather conditions, such as winter storms, flooding, tropical storms and hurricanes, and changes in weather patterns;
compliance with, or changes in, environmental, health and safety laws and regulations relating to air emissions, hydraulic fracturing, access to and use of water, disposal or other discharge (e.g., into injection wells) of produced water, drilling fluids and other wastes, laws and regulations imposing conditions or restrictions on drilling and completion operations and on the transportation of crude oil and natural gas, and other laws and regulations, such as tax laws and regulations;
the availability and timely issuance of required federal, state, tribal and other permits and licenses, which may be affected by (among other things) government shutdowns or other suspensions of, or delays in, government services;
the availability of, costs associated with and terms of contractual arrangements for properties, including mineral licenses and leases, pipelines, rail cars, crude oil hauling trucks and qualified drivers and facilities and equipment to gather, process, compress, store, transport and market crude oil, natural gas and related commodities; and


the costs of, or shortages or delays in the availability of, drilling rigs, hydraulic fracturing services, pressure pumping equipment and supplies, tubular materials, water, sand, disposal facilities, qualified personnel and other necessary facilities, equipment, materials, supplies and services.

Our failure to recover our investment in wells, increases in the costs of our drilling operations or those of our third-party operators, and/or curtailments, delays or cancellations of our drilling operations or those of our third-party operators, in each case, due to any of the above factors or other factors, may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For related discussion of the risks and potential losses and liabilities inherent in our crude oil and natural gas operations generally, see the immediately following risk factor.



Our crude oil and natural gas operations and supporting activities and operations involve many risks and expose us to potential losses and liabilities, and insurance may not fully protect us against these risks and potential losses and liabilities.

Our crude oil and natural gas operations and supporting activities and operations are subject to all of the risks associated with exploring and drilling for, and producing, gathering, processing, compressing, storing and transporting, crude oil and natural gas, including the risks of:

well blowouts and cratering;
loss of well control;
crude oil spills, natural gas leaks, formation water (i.e., produced water) spills and pipeline ruptures;
pipe failures and casing collapses;
uncontrollable flows of crude oil, natural gas, formation water or drilling fluids;
releases of chemicals, wastes or pollutants;
adverse weather conditions,events, such as winter storms, flooding, tropical storms and hurricanes, and other natural disasters;
fires and explosions;
terrorism, vandalism and physical, electronic and cyber securitycybersecurity breaches;
formations with abnormal or unexpected pressures;
leaks or spills in connection with, or associated with, the gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation of crude oil and natural gas; and
malfunctions of, or damage to, gathering, processing, compression and transportation facilities and equipment and other facilities and equipment utilized in support of our crude oil and natural gas operations.

If any of these events occur, we could incur losses, liabilities and other additional costs as a result of:

injury or loss of life;
damage to, or destruction of, property, facilities, equipment and crude oil and natural gas reservoirs;
pollution or other environmental damage;
regulatory investigations and penalties as well as clean-upcleanup and remediation responsibilities and costs;
suspension or interruption of our operations, including due to injunction;
repairs necessary to resume operations; and
compliance with laws and regulations enacted as a result of such events.

We maintain insurance against many, but not all, such losses and liabilities in accordance with what we believe are customary industry practices and in amounts and at costs that we believe to be prudent and commercially practicable. TheHowever, the occurrence of any of these events and any losses or liabilities incurred as a result of such events, if uninsured or in excess of our insurance coverage, would reduce the funds available to us for our operations and could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.



Our ability to sell and deliver our crude oil and natural gas production could be materially and adversely affected if adequate gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation facilities and equipment are unavailable.

The sale of our crude oil and natural gas production depends on a number of factors beyond our control, including the availability, proximity and capacity of, and costs associated with, gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation facilities and equipment owned by third parties. These facilities may be temporarily unavailable to us due to market conditions, regulatory reasons, mechanical reasons or other factors or conditions, and may not be available to us in the future on terms we consider acceptable, if at all. In particular, in certain newer plays, the capacity of gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation facilities and equipment may not be sufficient to accommodate potential production from existing and new wells. In addition, lack of financing, construction and permitting delays, permitting costs and regulatory or other constraints could limit or delay the construction, manufacture or other acquisition of new gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation facilities and equipment by third parties or us, and we may experience delays or increased costs in accessing the pipelines, gathering systems or rail systems necessary to transport our production to points of sale or delivery.

Any significant change in market or other conditions affecting gathering, processing, compression, storage or transportation facilities and equipment or the availability of these facilities, including due to our failure or inability to obtain access to these facilities and equipment on terms acceptable to us or at all, could materially and adversely affect our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.



If we fail to acquire or find sufficient additional reserves over time, our reserves and production will decline from their current levels.

The rate of production from crude oil and natural gas properties generally declines as reserves are produced. Except to the extent that we conduct successful exploration, exploitation and development activities resulting in additional reserves, acquire additional properties containing reserves or, through engineering studies, identify additional behind-pipe zones or secondary recovery reserves, our reserves will decline as they are produced. Maintaining our production of crude oil and natural gas at, or increasing our production from, current levels, is, therefore, highly dependent upon our level of success in acquiring or finding additional reserves. To the extent we are unsuccessful in acquiring or finding additional reserves, our future cash flows and results of operations and, in turn, the trading price of our common stock could be materially and adversely affected.

We incur certain costs to comply with government regulations, particularly regulations relating to environmental protection and safety, and could incur even greater costs in the future.

Our crude oil and natural gas operations and supporting activities are regulated extensively by federal, state, tribal and local governments and regulatory agencies, both domestically and in the foreign countries in which we do business, and are subject to interruption or termination by governmental and regulatory authorities based on environmental, health, safety or other considerations. Moreover, we have incurred and will continue to incur costs in our efforts to comply with the requirements of environmental, health, safety and other regulations. Further, the regulatory environment could change in ways that we cannot predict and that might substantially increase our costs of compliance and, in turn, materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Specifically, as a current or past owner or lessee and operator of crude oil and natural gas properties, we are subject to various federal, state, tribal, local and foreign regulations relating to the discharge of materials into, and the protection of, the environment. These regulations may, among other things, impose liability on us for the cost of pollution cleanup resulting from current or past operations, subject us to liability for pollution damages and require suspension or cessation of operations in affected areas. Changes in, or additions to, these regulations could lead to increased operating and compliance costs and, in turn, materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Local, state, nationalfederal and international regulatory bodies have been increasingly focused on GHGgreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change issues in recent years. For example, we are subject to the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) rule requiring annual reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG)GHG emissions. In addition, in May 2016, the U.S. EPA issued regulations that require operators to reduce methane emissions and emissions of volatile organic compounds from new, modified and reconstructed crude oil and natural gas wells and equipment located at natural gas production gathering and booster stations, gas processing plants and natural gas transmission compressor stations. In



At the international level, in December 2015, the U.S. participated in the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France. The Paris Agreement (adopted at the conference) calls for nations to undertake efforts with respect to global temperatures and GHG emissions. The Paris Agreement went into effect on November 4, 2016. It remains unclear whetherHowever, the U.S. has announced its intention to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In response, many state and howlocal officials have stated their intent to intensify efforts to uphold the results ofcommitments set forth in the 2016 U.S. election could impact the regulation of GHG emissions at the federal and state level.international accord.

It is possible that the Paris Agreement and subsequent domestic and international regulations will have adverse effects on the market for crude oil, natural gas and other fossil fuel products as well as adverse effects on the business and operations of companies engaged in the exploration for, and production of, crude oil, natural gas and other fossil fuel products. EOG is unable to predict the timing, scope and effect of any currently proposed or future investigations, laws, regulations or treaties regarding climate change and GHG emissions, but the direct and indirect costs of such investigations, laws, regulations and treaties (if enacted) could materially and adversely affect EOG's operations, financial condition and results of operations.



The regulation of hydraulic fracturing is primarily conducted at the state and local level through permitting and other compliance requirements. In March 2015,November 2016, however, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issued new regulations applicable to hydraulic fracturing activities on federal and Indian lands, including requirements for chemical disclosure, wellbore integrity, and handling of flow back and produced water. Those regulations were set aside by a federal district court in June 2016, but are on appeal to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. In November 2016, the BLM issued a final rule that limits venting, flaring and leaking of natural gas from oil and gas wells and equipment on federal and Indian lands.lands (in September 2018, the BLM issued a final rule rescinding certain requirements of the rule). In addition, the U.S. EPA has issued regulations relating to hydraulic fracturing and there have been various other proposals to regulate hydraulic fracturing at the federal level. Any new federal regulations that may be imposed on hydraulic fracturing could result in additional permitting and disclosure requirements, additional operating and compliance costs and additional operating restrictions. Moreover, some state and local governments have imposed or have considered imposing various conditions and restrictions on drilling and completion operations. Any such federal or state requirements, restrictions or conditions could lead to operational delays and increased operating and compliance costs and, moreover, could delay or effectively prevent the development of crude oil and natural gas from formations which would not be economically viable without the use of hydraulic fracturing. Accordingly, our production of crude oil and natural gas could be materially and adversely affected. For additional discussion regarding climate change regulation and hydraulic fracturing regulation, see Climate Change - United States and Hydraulic Fracturing - United States under ITEM 1, Business - Regulation.

We will continue to monitor and assess any proposed or new policies, legislation, regulations and treaties in the areas where we operate to determine the impact on our operations and take appropriate actions, where necessary. We are unable to predict the timing, scope and effect of any currently proposed or future laws, regulations or treaties, but the direct and indirect costs of such laws, regulations and treaties (if enacted) could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. For related discussion, see the risk factor below regarding the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act with respect to regulation of derivatives transactions and entities (such as EOG) that participate in such transactions.

Certain U.S. federal income tax deductions currently available with respectTax laws and regulations applicable to crude oil and natural gas exploration and production companies may cease to be available in the future or may be otherwise modified as a resultchange over time, and such changes could materially and adversely affect our cash flows, results of future legislation.operations and financial condition.

Legislation may beFrom time to time, legislation has been proposed in the future that, could, if enacted into law, would make significant changes to U.S. tax laws. Such changes may include, but not be limited to, the elimination of certain U.S. federal income tax incentives currently availablelaws applicable to crude oil and natural gas exploration and production companies, such as with respect to the intangible drilling and development costs deduction and bonus tax depreciation. WeWhile these specific changes were not included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law in December 2017, no accurate prediction can give no assurancebe made as to whether any such legislative changes or similar or other tax law changes will be proposed in the future and, if enacted, how soon any such changes would become effective. The enactmentwhat the specific provisions or the effective date of any such changes inlegislation would be. The elimination of certain U.S. federal income tax lawsdeductions, as well as any other changes to, or the imposition of new, federal, state, local or non-U.S. taxes (including the imposition of, or increases in, production, severance or similar taxes), could materially and adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

A portion of our crude oil and natural gas production may be subject to interruptions that could have a material and adverse effect on us.

A portion of our crude oil and natural gas production may be interrupted, or shut in, from time to time for various reasons, including, but not limited to, as a result of accidents, weather conditions, the unavailability of gathering, processing, compression, storage, transportation or refining facilities or equipment or field labor issues, or intentionally as a result of market conditions such as crude oil or natural gas prices that we deem uneconomic. If a substantial amount of our production is interrupted or shut in, our cash flows and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.



We have limited control over the activities on properties we do not operate.

Some of the properties in which we have an interest are operated by other companies and involve third-party working interest owners. As a result, we have limited ability to influence or control the operation or future development of such properties, including compliance with environmental, safety and other regulations, or the amount of capital expenditures that we will be required to fund with respect to such properties. Moreover, we are dependent on the other working interest owners of such projects to fund their contractual share of the capital expenditures of such projects. In addition, a third-party operator could also decide to shut-in or curtail production from wells, or plug and abandon marginal wells, on properties owned by that operator during periods of lower crude oil or natural gas prices. These limitations and our dependence on the operator and third-party working interest owners for these projects could cause us to incur unexpected future costs, lower production and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.



If we acquire crude oil and natural gas properties, our failure to fully identify existing and potential problems, to accurately estimate reserves, production rates or costs, or to effectively integrate the acquired properties into our operations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we seek to acquire crude oil and natural gas properties - for example, our October 2016 mergers and related asset purchase transactions with Yates Petroleum Corporation and certain of its affiliated entities. Although we perform reviews of properties to be acquired in a manner that we believe is duly diligent and consistent with industry practices, reviews of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems (such as title or environmental issues), nor may they permit us to become sufficiently familiar with the properties in order to assess fully their deficiencies and potential. Even when problems with a property are identified, we often may assume environmental and other risks and liabilities in connection with acquired properties pursuant to the acquisition agreements.

In addition, there are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of crude oil and natural gas reserves (as discussed further below), actual future production rates and associated costs with respect to acquired properties. Actual reserves, production rates and costs may vary substantially from those assumed in our estimates. In addition, an acquisition may have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations, particularly during the periods in which the operations of the acquired properties are being integrated into our ongoing operations or if we are unable to effectively integrate the acquired properties into our ongoing operations.

We have substantial capital requirements, and we may be unable to obtain needed financing on satisfactory terms, if at all.

We make, and will continue to make, substantial capital expenditures for the acquisition, exploration, development, production and transportation of crude oil and natural gas reserves. We intend to finance our capital expenditures primarily through our cash flows from operations, commercial paper borrowings, sales of non-core assets and borrowings under other uncommitted credit facilities and, to a lesser extent and if and as necessary, bank borrowings, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and public and private equity and debt offerings.

Lower crude oil and natural gas prices, however, reduce our cash flows and could also delay or impair our ability to consummate certain planned non-core asset sales and divestitures. Further, if the condition of the credit and capital markets materially declines, we might not be able to obtain financing on terms we consider acceptable, if at all. WeaknessIn addition, weakness and/or volatility in domestic and global financial markets or economic conditions andor a depressed commodity price environment may increase the interest rates that lenders and commercial paper investors require us to pay andor adversely affect our ability to finance our capital expenditures through equity or debt offerings or other borrowings. A

Similarly, a reduction in our cash flows (for example, as a result of lower crude oil and natural gas prices or unanticipated well shut-ins) and the corresponding adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations may also increase the interest rates that lenders and commercial paper investors require us to pay. In addition, aA substantial increase in interest rates would decrease our net cash flows available for reinvestment. Any of these factors could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

OurFurther, our ability to obtain financings, our borrowing costs and the terms of any financings are, in part, dependent on the credit ratings assigned to our debt by independent credit rating agencies. FactorsThe interrelated factors that may impact our credit ratings include our debt levels; planned asset purchases or sales; near-term and long-term production growth opportunities; liquidity; asset quality; cost structure; product mix; and commodity pricing levels (including, but not limited to, the estimates and assumptions of credit rating agencies with respect to future commodity prices). In February 2016, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (each an independent credit rating agency), as a result of their lowered assumptions with respect to future commodity prices, each lowered its credit ratings of several investment grade-rated U.S. oil and gas exploration and production companies, including its rating of our long-term debt. Such ratings downgrades could increase our borrowing costs and may adversely impact our ability to access financings. In addition, weWe cannot provide any assurance that our current credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that our credit ratings will be raised in the future, nor can we provide any assurance that any of our credit ratings will not be further lowered.



The inability of our customers and other contractual counterparties to satisfy their obligations to us may have a material and adverse effect on us.

We have various customers for the crude oil, natural gas and related commodities that we produce as well as various other contractual counterparties, including several financial institutions and affiliates of financial institutions. Domestic and global economic conditions, including the financial condition of financial institutions generally, while weakened in recent years, have improved somewhat. However, there continues to be weakness and volatility in domestic and global financial markets and a depressed commodity price environment, and there is the possibility that lenders may react by tightening credit. These conditions and factors may adversely affect the ability of our customers and other contractual counterparties to pay amounts owed to us from time to time and to otherwise satisfy their contractual obligations to us, as well as their ability to access the credit and capital markets for such purposes.

Moreover, our customers and other contractual counterparties may be unable to satisfy their contractual obligations to us for reasons unrelated to these conditions and factors, such as the unavailability of required facilities or equipment due to mechanical failure or market conditions. Furthermore, if a customer is unable to satisfy its contractual obligation to purchase crude oil, natural gas or related commodities from us, we may be unable to sell such production to another customer on terms we consider acceptable, if at all, due to the geographic location of such production,production; the availability, proximity orand capacity of appropriate gathering, processing, compression, storage, transportation and transportation facilitiesrefining facilities; or market or other factors and conditions.

The inability of our customers and other contractual counterparties to pay amounts owed to us and to otherwise satisfy their contractual obligations to us may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Competition in the oil and gas exploration and production industry is intense, and many of our competitors have greater resources than we have.

We compete with major integrated oil and gas companies, government-affiliated oil and gas companies and other independent oil and gas companies for the acquisition of licenses and leases, properties and reserves and access to the facilities, equipment, materials, services and employees and other contract personnel (including geologists, geophysicists, engineers and other specialists) necessary to explore for, develop, produce, market and transport crude oil and natural gas. In addition, certain of our competitors have financial and other resources substantially greater than those we possess and have established strategic long-term positions andor strong governmental relationships in countries or areas in which we may seek new or expanded entry. As a consequence, we may be at a competitive disadvantage in certain respects, such as in bidding for drilling rights or in accessing necessary services, facilities, equipment, materials and personnel. In addition, our larger competitors may have a competitive advantage when responding to factors that affect demand for crude oil and natural gas, such as changing worldwide prices and levels of production and the cost and availability of alternative fuels. We also face competition, to a lesser extent, from competing energy sources, such as alternative energy sources.

Reserve estimates depend on many interpretations and assumptions that may turn out to be inaccurate. Any significant inaccuracies in these interpretations and assumptions could cause the reported quantities of our reserves to be materially misstated.

Estimating quantities of crude oil, NGL and natural gas reserves and future net cash flows from such reserves is a complex, inexact process. It requires interpretations of available technical data and various assumptions, including assumptions relating to economic factors, made by our management and our independent petroleum consultants. Any significant inaccuracies in these interpretations or assumptions could cause the reported quantities of our reserves and future net cash flows from such reserves to be overstated or understated. Also, the data for a given reservoir may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity, evolving production history, and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions.conditions and improvements and other changes in geological, geophysical and engineering evaluation methods.



To prepare estimates of our economically recoverable crude oil, NGL and natural gas reserves and future net cash flows from our reserves, we analyze many variable factors, such as historical production from the area compared with production rates from other producing areas. We also analyze available geological, geophysical, production and engineering data, and the extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary. The process also involves economic assumptions relating to commodity prices, production costs, gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation costs, severance, ad valorem and other applicable taxes, capital expenditures and workover and remedial costs, many of which factors are or may be beyond our control. Our actual reserves and future net cash flows from such reserves most likely will vary from our estimates. Any significant variance, including any significant revisions or "write-downs" to our existing reserve estimates, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, the trading price of our common stock. For related discussion, see ITEM 2, Properties - Oil and Gas Exploration and Production - Properties and Reserves and Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Weather and climate may have a significant and adverse impact on us.

Demand for crude oil and natural gas is, to a significant degree, dependent on weather and climate, which impacts, among other things, the price we receive for the commodities we produce and, in turn, our cash flows and results of operations. For example, relatively warm temperatures during a winter season generally result in relatively lower demand for natural gas (as less natural gas is used to heat residences and businesses) and, as a result, lower prices for natural gas production.

In addition, there has been public discussion that climate change may be associated with more frequent or more extreme weather events, changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, changes to ground and surface water availability, and other related phenomena, which could affect some, or all, of our operations. Our exploration, exploitation and development activities and equipment cancould be adversely affected by extreme weather conditions,events, such as winter storms, flooding and tropical storms and hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, which may cause a loss of production from temporary cessation of activity or damaged facilities and equipment. Such extreme weather conditionsevents could also impact other areas of our operations, including access to our drilling and production facilities for routine operations, maintenance and repairs, the installation and operation of gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation facilities and the availability of, and our access to, necessary third-party services, such as gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation services. Such extreme weather conditionsevents and changes in weather patterns may materially and adversely affect our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

Our hedging activities may prevent us from benefiting fully from increases in crude oil and natural gas prices and may expose us to other risks, including counterparty risk.

We use derivative instruments (primarily financial basis swap, price swap, option, swaption collar and basis swapcollar contracts) to hedge the impact of fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices on our results of operations and cash flows. To the extent that we engage in hedging activities to protect ourselves against commodity price declines, we may be prevented from fully realizing the benefits of increases in crude oil and natural gas prices above the prices established by our hedging contracts. OurAt February 19, 2019, our forecasted crude oil production (excluding basis swap contracts) for 2017 is currently approximately 5% hedged at approximately $50.04 per barrel,2019 and our forecasted natural gas production for 2017 is currently approximately 30% hedged at approximately $3.07 per million British thermal units.2019 were not hedged. As a result, a portion of our forecasted production for 2017 remains unhedged and2019 is subject to fluctuating market prices. If we are ultimately unable todo not hedge additional production volumes for 20172019 and beyond, we will be impacted by further commodity price declines, which may result in lower net cash provided by operating activities. In addition, our hedging activities may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances in which the counterparties to our hedging contracts fail to perform under the contracts.

Federal legislation and related regulations regarding derivatives transactions could have a material and adverse impact on our hedging activities.

As discussed in the risk factor immediately above, we use derivative instruments to hedge the impact of fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices on our results of operations and cash flows. In 2010, Congress adopted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), which, among other matters, provides for federal oversight of the over-the-counter derivatives market and entities that participate in that market and mandates that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and certain federal agencies that regulate the banking and insurance sectors (the Prudential Regulators) adopt rules or regulations implementing the Dodd-Frank Act and providing definitions of terms used in the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act establishes margin requirements and requires clearing and trade execution practices for certain categories of swaps and may result in certain market participants needing to curtail their derivatives activities. Although some of the rules necessary to implement the Dodd-Frank Act are yet to be adopted, the CFTC, the SEC and the Prudential Regulators have issued numerous rules, including a rule establishing an "end-user" exception to mandatory clearing (End-User Exception), a rule regarding margin for uncleared swaps (Margin Rule) and a proposed rule imposing position limits (Position Limits Rule).



We qualify as a "non-financial entity" for purposes of the End-User Exception and, as such, we are eligible for, and expect to utilize, such exception. As a result, our hedging activities will not be subject to mandatory clearing or the margin requirements imposed in connection with mandatory clearing. We also qualify as a "non-financial end user" for purposes of the Margin Rule; therefore, our uncleared swaps are not subject to regulatory margin requirements. Finally, we believe our hedging activities would constitute bona fide hedging under the Position Limits Rule and would not be subject to limitation under such rule if it is enacted. However, many of our hedge counterparties and many other market participants may not be eligible for the End-User Exception, may be subject to mandatory clearing or the Margin Rule for swaps with some or all of their other swap counterparties, and/or may be subject to the Position Limits Rule. In addition, the European Union and other non-U.S. jurisdictions have enacted laws and regulations related to derivatives (collectively, Foreign Regulations) which may apply to our transactions with counterparties subject to such Foreign Regulations.

The Dodd-Frank Act, the rules adopted thereunder and the Foreign Regulations could increase the cost of derivative contracts, alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against the price risks we encounter, reduce our ability to monetize or restructure our existing derivative contracts, and increase our exposure to less creditworthy counterparties. If our use of derivatives is reduced as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, related regulations or the Foreign Regulations, our results of operations may become more volatile, and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to plan for, and fund, our capital expenditure requirements. Any of these consequences could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business and prospects for future success depend to a significant extent upon the continued service and performance of our management team.

Our business and prospects for future success, including the successful implementation of our strategies and handling of issues integral to our future success, depend to a significant extent upon the continued service and performance of our management team. The loss of any member of our management team, and our inability to attract, motivate and retain substitute management personnel with comparable experience and skills, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in other countries and, as a result, are subject to certain political, economic and other risks.

Our operations in jurisdictions outside the U.S. are subject to various risks inherent in foreign operations. These risks include, among other risks:

increases in taxes and governmental royalties;
changes in laws and policies governing operations of foreign-based companies;
loss of revenue, loss of or damage to equipment, property and other assets and interruption of operations as a result of expropriation, nationalization, acts of terrorism, war, civil unrest and other political risks;
unilateral or forced renegotiation, modification or nullification of existing contracts with governmental entities;
difficulties enforcing our rights against a governmental agency because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity and foreign sovereignty over international operations; and
currency restrictions or exchange rate fluctuations (e.g., as a result of Great Britain's June 2016 vote to leave the European Union ("Brexit")).fluctuations.

Our international operations may also be adversely affected by U.S. laws and policies affecting foreign trade and taxation, including tariffs or trade or other economic sanctions and modifications to, or withdrawal from, international trade treaties. The realization of any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our results of operations.

The reporting currency for our financial statements is the U.S. dollar. However, certain of our subsidiaries are located in countries other than the U.S. and have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of certain of these foreign subsidiaries are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. To prepare our consolidated financial statements, we must translate those assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars at then-applicable exchange rates. Consequently, increases and decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar versus other currencies will affect the amount of these items in our consolidated financial statements, even if the amount has not changed in the original currency. These translations could result in changes to our results of operations from period to period. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, less than 1% of our net operating revenues related to operations of our foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency was not the U.S. dollar.



Our business could be adversely affected by security threats, including cybersecurity threats.

As a producer of crude oil and natural gas, weWe face various security threats, including cybersecurity threats to gain unauthorized access to our sensitive information or to render our information or systems unusable, and threats to the security of our facilities and infrastructure or third-party facilities and infrastructure, such as gathering and processing facilities, refineries, rail facilities and pipelines. The potential for such security threats subjects our operations to increased risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, unauthorized access to our seismic data, reserves information or other proprietary information could lead to data corruption, communication interruptions, or other disruptions to our operations.

Our implementation of various procedures and controls to monitor and mitigate such security threats and to increase security for our information, systems, facilities and infrastructure may result in increased capital and operating costs. Moreover, there can be no assurance that such procedures and controls will be sufficient to prevent security breaches from occurring. If any of these security breaches were to occur, they could lead to losses of, or damage to, sensitive information or facilities, infrastructure and systems essential to our business and operations, as well as data corruption, reputational damage,communication interruptions or other disruptions to our operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

Terrorist activities and military and other actions could materially and adversely affect us.

Terrorist attacks and the threat of terrorist attacks, whether domestic or foreign, as well as military or other actions taken in response to these acts, could cause instability in the global financial and energy markets. The U.S. government has at times issued public warnings that indicate that energy assets might be specific targets of terrorist organizations. Any such actions and the threat of such actions could materially and adversely affect us in unpredictable ways, including the disruption of energy supplies and markets, increased volatility in crude oil and natural gas prices or the possibility that the infrastructure on which we rely could be a direct target or an indirect casualty of an act of terrorism, and, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


ITEM 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  Properties

Oil and Gas Exploration and Production - Properties and Reserves

Reserve Information. For estimates and discussions of EOG's net proved reserves of crude oil and condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and natural gas, the qualifications of the preparers of EOG's reserve estimates, EOG's independent petroleum consultants and EOG's processes and controls with respect to its reserve estimates, see "Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements."

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond the control of the producer. The reserve data set forth in "Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements" represent only estimates. Reserve engineering is a complex subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner.  The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the amount and quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.  As a result, estimates by different engineers normally vary.  In addition, results of drilling, testing and production or fluctuations in commodity prices subsequent to the date of an estimate may justify revision of such estimate (upward or downward).  Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities ultimately recovered.  TheFurther, the meaningfulness of such estimates is highly dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they were based.  For related discussion, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors, and "Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements."



In general, the rate of production from crude oil and natural gas properties declines as reserves are produced.  Except to the extent EOG acquires additional properties containing proved reserves, conducts successful exploration, exploitation and development activities or, through engineering studies, identifies additional behind-pipe zones or secondary recovery reserves, the proved reserves of EOG will decline as reserves are produced.  The volumes to be generated from future activities of EOG are therefore highly dependent upon the level of success in finding or acquiring additional reserves.  For related discussion, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors. EOG's estimates of reserves filed with other federal agencies are consistent with the information set forth in "Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements."



Acreage. The following table summarizes EOG's gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage at December 31, 2016.2018. Excluded is acreage in which EOG's interest is limited to owned royalty, overriding royalty and other similar interests.

Developed Undeveloped TotalDeveloped Undeveloped Total
Gross Net Gross Net Gross NetGross Net Gross Net Gross Net
                      
United States3,162,359
 2,225,092
 3,156,070
 2,236,902
 6,318,429
 4,461,994
2,618,624
 1,884,489
 3,280,867
 2,409,792
 5,899,491
 4,294,281
Trinidad77,485
 66,578
 48,520
 38,816
 126,005
 105,394
79,277
 67,474
 201,435
 115,274
 280,712
 182,748
United Kingdom11,830
 5,603
 12,683
 4,248
 24,513
 9,851
China130,548
 130,548
 
 
 130,548
 130,548
130,548
 130,548
 
 
 130,548
 130,548
Canada40,000
 35,771
 105,560
 98,436
 145,560
 134,207
40,000
 35,771
 105,560
 98,436
 145,560
 134,207
Total3,422,222
 2,463,592
 3,322,833
 2,378,402
 6,745,055
 4,841,994
2,868,449
 2,118,282
 3,587,862
 2,623,502
 6,456,311
 4,741,784

Most of our undeveloped oil and gas leases, particularly in the United States, are subject to lease expiration if initial wells are not drilled within a specified period, generally between three and five years. Approximately 0.3 million net acres will expire in 2017, 0.22019, 0.5 million net acres will expire in 20182020 and 0.20.3 million net acres will expire in 20192021 if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases or obtain concessions. In the ordinary course of business, based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics, we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future. As of December 31, 2016,2018, there were no proved undeveloped reserves associated with such undeveloped acreage.

ProducingProductive Well Summary. EOG operated 11,297 gross and 9,525 net producing crude oil and natural gas wells at December 31, 2016. Gross crude oil and natural gas wells include 813 wells with multiple completions. The following table represents EOG's gross and net productive wells, including 2,107 wells in which EOG ownswe hold a working interest, including non-EOG operated wells.royalty interest.
Crude Oil Natural Gas TotalCrude Oil Natural Gas Total
Gross Net Gross Net Gross NetGross Net Gross Net Gross Net
                      
United States9,852
 5,855
 7,755
 4,493
 17,607
 10,348
9,023
 6,422
 6,360
 3,658
 15,383
 10,080
Trinidad13
 10
 35
 30
 48
 40
2
 2
 33
 27
 35
 29
United Kingdom3
 3
 
 
 3
 3
China
 
 30
 30
 30
 30

 
 36
 36
 36
 36
Canada3
 1
 26
 25
 29
 26

 
 24
 23
 24
 23
Total9,871
 5,869
 7,846
 4,578
 17,717
 10,447
Total (1)
9,025
 6,424
 6,453
 3,744
 15,478
 10,168
(1)EOG operated 11,366 gross and 9,744 net producing crude oil and natural gas wells at December 31, 2018. Gross crude oil and natural gas wells include 316 wells with multiple completions.



Drilling and Acquisition Activities.  During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, EOG expended $6.4 billion, $4.9$4.4 billion and $7.9$6.4 billion, respectively, for exploratory and development drilling, facilities and acquisition of leases and producing properties, including asset retirement obligations of $(20)$70 million, $53$56 million and $196$(20) million, respectively.  Included in the 2016 expenditures was $3.9 millionbillion of acquisitions of producing properties and leases in connection with the 2016 merger and related asset purchase transactions with Yates transaction.Petroleum Corporation and other affiliated entities. The following tables set forth the results of the gross crude oil and natural gas wells completed for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
Gross Development Wells Completed Gross Exploratory Wells CompletedGross Development Wells Completed Gross Exploratory Wells Completed
Crude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole Total Crude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole TotalCrude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole Total Crude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole Total
2018               
United States834
 39
 22
 895
 
 
 1
 1
Trinidad
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
China
 1
 
 1
 
 2
 
 2
Total834
 40
 22
 896
 
 2
 1
 3
2017               
United States568
 22
 13
 603
 
 
 1
 1
Trinidad
 8
 
 8
 
 1
 
 1
China
 3
 
 3
 
 
 1
 1
Total568
 33
 13
 614
 
 1
 2
 3
2016                
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
United States524
 39
 6
 569
 1
 
 
 1
524
 39
 6
 569
 1
 
 
 1
Trinidad
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 

 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Total524
 40
 6
 570
 1
 
 
 1
524
 40
 6
 570
 1
 
 
 1
2015 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
United States494
 16
 9
 519
 2
 
 
 2
Trinidad
 3
 
 3
 
 1
 
 1
China
 
 
 
 
 3
 2
 5
Total494
 19
 9
 522
 2
 4
 2
 8
2014            

  
United States901
 47
 8
 956
 12
 
 5
 17
Trinidad
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
United Kingdom
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
China
 
 
 
 
 2
 
 2
Canada42
 
 
 42
 
 
 
 
Argentina
 
 
 
 
 
 3
 3
Total943
 48
 8
 999
 12
 2
 9
 23

The following tables set forth the results of the net crude oil and natural gas wells completed for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
Net Development Wells Completed Net Exploratory Wells CompletedNet Development Wells Completed Net Exploratory Wells Completed
Crude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole Total Crude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole TotalCrude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole Total Crude Oil Natural Gas Dry Hole Total
2018               
United States704
 37
 18
 759
 
 
 1
 1
Trinidad
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
China
 1
 
 1
 
 2
 
 2
Total704
 38
 18
 760
 
 2
 1
 3
2017               
United States490
 21
 13
 524
 
 
 1
 1
Trinidad
 6
 
 6
 
 1
 
 1
China
 3
 
 3
 
 
 1
 1
Total490
 30
 13
 533
 
 1
 2
 3
2016                
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
United States420
 17
 6
 443
 1
 
 
 1
420
 17
 6
 443
 1
 
 
 1
Trinidad
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 

 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Total420
 18
 6
 444
 1
 
 
 1
420
 18
 6
 444
 1
 
 
 1
2015 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
United States457
 14
 8
 479
 2
 
 
 2
Trinidad
 2
 
 2
 
 1
 
 1
China
 
 
 
 
 3
 2
 5
Total457
 16
 8
 481
 2
 4
 2
 8
2014 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
United States807
 39
 7
 853
 11
 
 5
 16
Trinidad
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
United Kingdom
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
China
 
 
 
 
 2
 
 2
Canada35
 
 
 35
 
 
 
 
Argentina
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
Total842
 40
 7
 889
 11
 2
 7
 20



EOG participated in the drilling of wells that were in the process of being drilled or completed at the end of the period as set out in the table below for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
Wells in Progress at End of PeriodWells in Progress at End of Period
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Gross Net Gross Net Gross NetGross Net Gross Net Gross Net
                      
United States237
 194
 516
 429
 388
 327
297
 238
 247
 208
 237
 194
Trinidad1
 1
 
 
 1
 1

 
 
 
 1
 1
China
 
 
 
 2
 2
4
 4
 1
 1
 
 
Total238
 195
 516
 429
 391
 330
301
 242
 248
 209
 238
 195

Included in the previous table of wells in progress at the end of the period were wells which had been drilled, but were not completed (DUCs). The following table sets forth EOG's DUCs, for which proved undeveloped reserves had been booked, as of the end of each period.
 Drilled Uncompleted Wells at End of Period
 2016 2015 2014
 Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
            
United States173
 137
 406
 333
 306
 269
Total173
 137
 406
 333
 306
 269

In order to effectively manage its capital expenditures and to provide flexibility in managing its drilling rig and well completion schedules, EOG, from time to time, will have an inventory of DUCs. At December 31, 2016,2018, there were approximately 7278 MMBoe of net proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) associated with EOG's inventory of DUCs. Under EOG's current drilling plan, all such DUCs are expected to be completed within five years from the original booking date of such reserves. The following table sets forth EOG's DUCs, for which PUDs had been booked, as of the end of each period.

 Drilled Uncompleted Wells at End of Period
 2018 2017 2016
 Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
            
United States168
 137
 147
 121
 173
 137
China3
 3
 1
 1
 
 
Total171
 140
 148
 122
 173
 137
EOG acquired wells which includesas set forth in the following tables as of the end of each period (excluding the acquisition of additional interests in certain114, 29 and 63 net wells in which EOG previously owned an interest as set out in the tables below for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014:respectively):
Gross Acquired Wells Net Acquired WellsGross Acquired Wells Net Acquired Wells
Crude
Oil
 Natural Gas Total 
Crude
Oil
 Natural Gas Total
Crude
Oil
 Natural Gas Total 
Crude
Oil
 Natural Gas Total
2018           
United States15
 13
 28
 10
 6
 16
Total15
 13
 28
 10
 6
 16
2017           
United States12
 3
 15
 6
 2
 8
Total12
 3
 15
 6
 2
 8
2016            
  
  
  
  
  
United States4,112
 4,144
 8,256
 1,261
 2,327
 3,588
4,112
 4,144
 8,256
 1,228
 2,297
 3,525
Total4,112
 4,144
 8,256
 1,261
 2,327
 3,588
4,112
 4,144
 8,256
 1,228
 2,297
 3,525
2015 
  
  
  
  
  
United States24
 
 24
 23
 
 23
Total24
 
 24
 23
 
 23
2014 
  
  
  
  
  
United States91
 10
 101
 41
 9
 50
Total91
 10
 101
 41
 9
 50
 
All of EOG's drilling and completion activities are conducted on a contractual basis with independent drilling contractors and other third-party service contractors.  EOG's other property, plant and equipment primarily includes gathering, transportation and processing infrastructure assets, buildings, crude-by-rail assets, and sand mine and sand processing assets which support EOG's exploration and production activities. EOG does not own drilling rigs, hydraulic fracturing equipment or rail cars.



ITEM 3.  Legal Proceedings

TheSee the information required by this Item is set forth under the "Contingencies" caption in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, andwhich is incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95 to this report.


PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity  Securities

EOG's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol "EOG." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales price per share for EOG's common stock, as reported by the NYSE, and the amount of the cash dividend declared per share. The quarterly cash dividend on EOG's common stock has historically been declared in the quarter immediately preceding the quarter of payment and paid on January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31 of each year (or, if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day).
 Price Range  
 High Low Dividend Declared
2016     
First Quarter$77.70
 $57.15
 $0.1675
Second Quarter86.87
 69.66
 0.1675
Third Quarter97.20
 78.04
 0.1675
Fourth Quarter109.37
 88.94
 0.1675
2015 
  
  
First Quarter$97.88
 $82.72
 $0.1675
Second Quarter101.36
 86.15
 0.1675
Third Quarter87.85
 68.15
 0.1675
Fourth Quarter89.52
 69.30
 0.1675

As of February 8, 2017,14, 2019, there were approximately 1,9002,100 record holders and approximately 363,000454,000 beneficial owners of EOG's common stock.

EOG currently intends to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends on its outstanding shares of common stock in the future. However, the determination of the amount of future cash dividends, if any, to be declared and paid will depend upon, among other factors, the financial condition, cash flows, level of exploration and development expenditure opportunities and future business prospects of EOG.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, EOG's share repurchase activity:
 
 
 
 
 
Period
 
(a)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
 
(b)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
(c)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
 
(d)
Maximum Number
of Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs (2)
         
October 1, 2016 - October 31, 2016 14,839
 $96.27
  6,386,200
November 1, 2016 - November 30, 2016 30,934
 $99.11
  6,386,200
December 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 210,296
 $104.08
  6,386,200
Total 256,069
 $103.02
    
 
 
 
 
 
Period
 
(a)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
 
(b)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
(c)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
 
(d)
Maximum Number
of Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs (2)
         
October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 29,765
 $128.17
  6,386,200
November 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 2,062
 104.60
  6,386,200
December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 7,415
 98.11
  6,386,200
Total 39,242
 $121.26
    
 
(1)The 256,06939,242 total shares for the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2018, and the 921,458538,892 total shares for the full year 2016,2018, consist solely of shares that were withheld by or returned to EOG (i) in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations that arose upon the exercise of employee stock options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights or the vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock unit performance stock or performance unit grants or (ii) in payment of the exercise price of employee stock options.  These shares do not count against the 10 million aggregate share repurchase authorization of EOG's Board discussed below.
(2)In September 2001, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 shares of EOG's common stock.  During 2016,2018, EOG did not repurchase any shares under the Board-authorized repurchase program.



Comparative Stock Performance

The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that EOG specifically requests that such information be treated as "soliciting material" or specifically incorporates such information by reference into such a filing.

The performance graph shown below compares the cumulative five-year total return to stockholders on EOG's common stock as compared to the cumulative five-year total returns on the Standard and Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) and the Standard and Poor's 500 Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (S&P O&G E&P).  The comparison was prepared based upon the following assumptions:

1.$100 was invested on December 31, 20112013 in each of the following:  common stock of EOG, the S&P 500 and the S&P O&G E&P.
2.Dividends are reinvested.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Returns
EOG, S&P 500 and S&P O&G E&P
(Performance Results Through December 31, 2016)2018)

stockcharta01.jpgstockgrapha08.jpg

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20162013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
EOG$100.00
 $123.42
 $172.17
 $189.90
 $147.12
 $211.91
$100.00
 $110.30
 $85.45
 $123.08
 $132.28
 $107.59
S&P 500$100.00
 $116.00
 $153.57
 $174.60
 $177.05
 $198.22
$100.00
 $113.69
 $115.27
 $129.06
 $157.23
 $150.34
S&P O&G E&P$100.00
 $103.65
 $132.14
 $118.15
 $77.80
 $103.37
$100.00
 $89.41
 $58.88
 $78.21
 $73.28
 $58.99


ITEM 6.  Selected Financial Data
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

The following selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and ITEM 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Year Ended December 31 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
                    
Statement of Income Data:                    
Net Operating Revenues $7,650,632
 $8,757,428
 $18,035,340
 $14,487,118
 $11,682,636
Operating Revenues and Other (1)
 $17,275,399
 $11,208,320
 $7,650,632
 $8,757,428
 $18,035,340
Operating Income (Loss) $(1,225,281) $(6,686,079) $5,241,823
 $3,675,211
 $1,479,797
 $4,469,346
 $926,402
 $(1,225,281) $(6,686,079) $5,241,823
Net Income (Loss) $(1,096,686) $(4,524,515) $2,915,487
 $2,197,109
 $570,279
 $3,419,040
 $2,582,579
 $(1,096,686) $(4,524,515) $2,915,487
Net Income (Loss) Per Share        
  
          
Basic $(1.98) $(8.29) $5.36
 $4.07
 $1.07
 $5.93
 $4.49
 $(1.98) $(8.29) $5.36
Diluted $(1.98) $(8.29) $5.32
 $4.02
 $1.05
 $5.89
 $4.46
 $(1.98) $(8.29) $5.32
Dividends Per Common Share $0.670
 $0.670
 $0.585
 $0.375
 $0.340
 $0.810
 $0.670
 $0.670
 $0.670
 $0.585
Average Number of Common Shares        
  
          
Basic 553,384
 545,697
 543,443
 540,341
 535,155
 576,578
 574,620
 553,384
 545,697
 543,443
Diluted 553,384
 545,697
 548,539
 546,227
 541,524
 580,441
 578,693
 553,384
 545,697
 548,539

At December 31 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
                    
Balance Sheet Data:                    
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net $25,707,078
 $24,210,721
 $29,172,644
 $26,148,836
 $23,337,681
 $28,075,519
 $25,665,037
 $25,707,078
 $24,210,721
 $29,172,644
Total Assets (1)
 29,459,433
 26,970,470
 34,758,599
 30,570,174
 27,331,542
Total Assets (2) (3)
 33,934,474
 29,833,078
 29,299,201
 26,834,908
 34,758,599
Total Debt (1)(3)
 6,986,358
 6,655,490
 5,905,846
 5,909,157
 6,307,145
 6,083,262
 6,387,071
 6,986,358
 6,655,490
 5,905,846
Total Stockholders' Equity 13,981,581
 12,943,035
 17,712,582
 15,418,459
 13,284,764
 19,364,188
 16,283,273
 13,981,581
 12,943,035
 17,712,582
 
(1)IncludesEffective January 1, 2018, EOG adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers" (ASU 2014-09). In connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, EOG presents natural gas processing fees relating to certain processing and marketing agreements within its United States segment as Gathering and Processing Costs instead of as a deduction to Natural Gas Revenues. There was no impact to operating income, net income or cash flows resulting from changes to the presentation of natural gas processing fees. EOG elected to adopt ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective approach with no reclassification of amounts for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (see Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements).
(2)Effective January 1, 2017, EOG adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes" (ASU 2015-17), which simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes in a classified balance sheet by eliminating the requirement to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts. Instead, ASU 2015-17 requires that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be shown as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2015-17, EOG restated its Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 by $160 million and $136 million, respectively, from deferred tax liabilities to deferred tax assets.
(3)Effective January 1, 2016, EOG adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Computation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" (ASU 2015-03). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2015-03, EOG restated its Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 by $4.8 million and $4.1 million, $4.1 million and $5.0 million inrespectively, of unamortized debt issuance costs from "Other Assets"Other Assets to "Long-Term Debt" for years ending December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. (See Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements.)Long-Term Debt.



ITEM 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, EOG), is one of the largest independent (non-integrated) crude oil and natural gas companies in the United States with proved reserves in the United States, Trinidad the United Kingdom and China.  EOG operates under a consistent business and operational strategy that focuses predominantly on maximizing the rate of return on investment of capital by controlling operating and capital costs and maximizing reserve recoveries.  Each prospective drilling location is evaluated by its estimated rate of return. This strategy is intended to enhance the generation of cash flow and earnings from each unit of production on a cost-effective basis, allowing EOG to deliver long-term production growth while maintaining a strong balance sheet.  EOG implements its strategy primarily by emphasizing the drilling of internally generated prospects in order to find and develop low-cost reserves.  Maintaining the lowest possible operating cost structure that is consistent with prudentefficient, safe and safeenvironmentally responsible operations is also an important goal in the implementation of EOG's strategy.

EOG realized a net lossincome of $1,097$3,419 million during 20162018 as compared to a net lossincome of $4,525$2,583 million for 2015.2017. At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG's total estimated net proved reserves were 2,1472,928 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBoe), an increase of 29401 MMBoe from December 31, 2015.2017.  During 2016,2018, net proved crude oil and condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs) reserves increased by 113330 million barrels (MMBbl), and net proved natural gas reserves decreasedincreased by 508424 billion cubic feet or 84 MMBoe.71 MMBoe, in each case from December 31, 2017.

Operations

Several important developments have occurred since January 1, 2016.2018.

United States. EOG's efforts to identify plays with large reserve potential have proven to be successful. EOG continues to drill numerous wells in large acreage plays, which in the aggregate have contributed substantially to, and are expected to continue to contribute substantially to, EOG's crude oil and liquids-rich natural gas production. EOG has placed an emphasis on applying its horizontal drilling and completion expertise to unconventional crude oil and liquids-rich reservoirs.

During 2016,2018, EOG continued to focus on increasing drilling, completion and completionoperating efficiencies using precision lateral targeting and advanced completion methods and reducing operating and capital costs through efficiency improvements and service cost reductions. These efficiency gains along with realized lower service costs resultedgained in lower drilling and completion costs and decreased operating expenses during 2016.prior years. In addition, EOG continues to look for opportunities to add drilling inventory through leasehold acquisitions, farm-ins or tactical acquisitions andcontinued to evaluate certain potential crude oil and liquids-rich natural gas exploration and development prospects.prospects and to look for opportunities to add drilling inventory through leasehold acquisitions, farm-ins, exchanges or tactical acquisitions. On a volumetric basis, as calculated using a ratio of 1.0 barrel of crude oil and condensate or NGLs to 6.0 thousand cubic feet of natural gas, crude oil and condensate and NGL production accounted for approximately 73%77% of United States production during 2016 as compared to 71% for 2015.2018 and 2017. During 2016,2018, drilling and completion activities occurred primarily in the Eagle Ford play, Delaware Basin play and Rocky Mountain area. EOG's major producing areas in the United States are in New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, Utah and Wyoming.

On October 4, 2016, EOG completed its previously announced mergers and related asset purchase transactions with Yates Petroleum Corporation (YPC), Abo Petroleum Corporation (ABO), MYCO Industries, Inc. (MYCO) and certain affiliated entities (collectively with YPC, ABO and MYCO, the Yates Entities). The Yates Entities had recent net production of approximately 28,600 barrels of oil equivalent per day, with 48% crude oil. The assets of the Yates Entities include 1.6 million total net acres, with approximately 180,000 net acres in the Delaware Basin Core, approximately 200,000 net acres in the Powder River Basin and approximately 130,000 net acres in the Permian Basin Northwest Shelf. The financial results of YPC, ABO and MYCO were included in EOG's consolidated financial statements beginning October 4, 2016.

Trinidad. In Trinidad, EOG continued to deliver natural gas under existing supply contracts. Several fields in the South East Coast Consortium (SECC) Block, Modified U(a) Block, Block 4(a) and, Modified U(b) Block, the Banyan Field and the Sercan Area (formerly known as the EMZ Area) have been developed and are producing natural gas which is sold to the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited and its subsidiary and crude oil and condensate which is sold to the Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited and its successor, Heritage Petroleum Company Limited. In the third quarter of 2016,2018, EOG installed a platform and pipelineconducted an ocean bottom nodal seismic survey in the Sercan Area in preparation for its three net well drilling program. InSECC Block and the fourth quarter of 2016, EOG drilledPelican Field and completed one net wellcontinued to process and began drilling a second well. EOG expects to bringreview the remaining two net wells of the Sercan program on-line in early 2017 and to drill three additional net wells in the second half of 2017.initial data.



Other International. In the United Kingdom,Sichuan Basin, Sichuan Province, China, EOG began productionentered 2018 with two drilled uncompleted wells and completed both wells. In addition, EOG drilled five natural gas wells and completed one of those wells in 2018 as part of the continuing development of the Bajiaochang Field, which natural gas is sold under a long-term contract to PetroChina.

In the U.K., EOG produced crude oil from its 100% working interest East Irish Sea Conwy crude oil project in March 2016, selling its first crude oil cargo at the end of the first quarter. Modifications to the nearby third-party-owned Douglas platform, which is used to process Conwy production, were completed in the first quarter of 2016 and acceptance and performance testing is ongoing.

In the Sichuan Basin, Sichuan Province, China,development project. EOG plans to drill and complete four wells in 2017.

During the third quarter of 2016, EOG successfully completed the sale of all of its Argentina assets.interest in EOG Resources United Kingdom Limited during the fourth quarter of 2018. EOG no longer has any presence in the U.K.

EOG continues to evaluate other select crude oil and natural gas opportunities outside the United States, primarily by pursuing exploitation opportunities in countries where indigenous crude oil and natural gas reserves have been identified.



Capital Structure

One of management's key strategies is to maintain a strong balance sheet with a consistently below average debt-to-total capitalization ratio as compared to those in EOG's peer group.  EOG's debt-to-total capitalization ratio was 33%24% at December 31, 20162018 and 34%28% at December 31, 2015.2017.  As used in this calculation, total capitalization represents the sum of total current and long-term debt and total stockholders' equity.

On October 4, 2016, in connection with the mergers and related asset purchase transactions with the Yates Entities, EOG issued an aggregate of approximately 25 million shares of EOG common stock, subject to the terms of the agreements, and paid to certain of the sellers under the asset purchase transactions an aggregate of approximately $16 million in cash for total consideration transferred of approximately $2.4 billion. In addition, under the terms of the agreements, EOG assumed and repaid approximately $164 million of debt owed by the Yates Entities, which was offset by approximately $70 million of cash of the Yates Entities.

At December 31, 2016, the $600 million aggregate principal amount of EOG's 5.875% Senior Notes due 2017 were reclassified as long-term debt based upon its intent and ability to ultimately replace such amount with other long-term debt.

On February 1, 2016,2018, EOG repaid upon maturity the $400$350 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.500%6.875% Senior Notes due 2016 (2016 Notes).

On January 14, 2016, EOG closed its sale of $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.15% Senior Notes due 2026 and $250 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.10% Senior Notes due 2036 (collectively, the Notes). Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2016. Net proceeds from the Notes offering totaled approximately $991 million and were used to repay the 2016 Notes when they matured on February 1, 2016, and for general corporate purposes, including repayment of outstanding commercial paper borrowings and funding of capital expenditures.2018.

During 2016,2018, EOG funded $6.6 billion ($3.9 billion411 million of which was related to the aforementioned Yates transaction)non-cash) in exploration and development and other property, plant and equipment expenditures (excluding asset retirement obligations), repaid $564$350 million aggregate principal amount of long-term debt, paid $373$438 million in dividends to common stockholders repaid $260 million of outstanding commercial paper borrowings and purchased $82$63 million of treasury stock in connection with stock compensation plans, primarily by utilizing net cash provided from its operating activities and net proceeds of $1,119$227 million from the sale of assets, net proceeds from the sale of the Notes and $29 million of excess tax benefits from stock compensation.assets.

Total anticipated 20172019 capital expenditures are estimated to range from approximately $3.7$6.1 billion to $4.1$6.5 billion, excluding acquisitions.acquisitions and non-cash exchanges. The majority of 20172019 expenditures will be focused on United States crude oil drilling activities. EOG has significant flexibility with respect to financing alternatives, including borrowings under its commercial paper program and other uncommitted credit facilities, bank borrowings, borrowings under its $2.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility, joint development agreements and similar agreements and equity and debt offerings.

Management continues to believe EOG has one of the strongest prospect inventories in EOG's history. When it fits EOG's strategy, EOG will make acquisitions that bolster existing drilling programs or offer incremental exploration and/or production opportunities. Management continues to believe EOG has one of the strongest prospect inventories in EOG's history.



Results of Operations

The following review of operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2018, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of EOG and notes thereto beginning on page F-1.

Net Operating Revenues and Other

During 2016, net2018, operating revenues decreased $1,106increased $6,067 million, or 13%54%, to $7,651$17,275 million from $8,757$11,208 million in 2015.2017. Total wellhead revenues, which are revenues generated from sales of EOG's production of crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas, decreased $907increased $4,039 million, or 14%51%, to $5,497$11,946 million in 20162018 from $6,404$7,907 million in 2015.2017. Revenues from the sales of crude oil and condensate and NGLs in 20162018 were approximately 86%89% of total wellhead revenues compared to 83%88% in 2015.2017. During 2016,2018, EOG recognized net losses on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts of $100$166 million compared to net gains of $62$20 million in 2015.2017. Gathering, processing and marketing revenues decreased $287increased $1,932 million during 2016,2018, to $1,966$5,230 million from $2,253$3,298 million in 2015.2017. Net gains on asset dispositions of $206$175 million in 20162018 were primarily as a result of exchanges of producing properties and acreage in Texas and sales of producing properties and acreage in the United Kingdom, Texas Louisiana,and the Rocky Mountain area and Oklahoma compared to net losses on asset dispositions of $9$99 million in 2015.2017.



Wellhead volume and price statistics for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
            
Crude Oil and Condensate Volumes (MBbld) (1)
            
United States 278.3
 283.3
 282.0
 394.8
 335.0
 278.3
Trinidad 0.8
 0.9
 1.0
 0.8
 0.9
 0.8
Other International (2)
 3.4
 0.2
 5.9
 4.3
 0.8
 3.4
Total 282.5
 284.4
 288.9
 399.9
 336.7
 282.5
Average Crude Oil and Condensate Prices ($/Bbl) (3)
    
  
    
  
United States $41.84
 $47.55
 $92.73
 $65.16
 $50.91
 $41.84
Trinidad 33.76
 39.51
 84.63
 57.26
 42.30
 33.76
Other International (2)
 36.72
 57.32
 86.75
 71.45
 57.20
 36.72
Composite 41.76
 47.53
 92.58
 65.21
 50.91
 41.76
Natural Gas Liquids Volumes (MBbld) (1)
            
United States 81.6
 76.9
 79.7
 116.1
 88.4
 81.6
Other International (2)
 
 0.1
 0.6
 
 
 
Total 81.6
 77.0
 80.3
 116.1
 88.4
 81.6
Average Natural Gas Liquids Prices ($/Bbl) (3)
    
  
    
  
United States $14.63
 $14.50
 $31.84
 $26.60
 $22.61
 $14.63
Other International (2)
 
 4.61
 40.73
 
 
 
Composite 14.63
 14.49
 31.91
 26.60
 22.61
 14.63
Natural Gas Volumes (MMcfd) (1)
            
United States 810
 886
 920
 923
 765
 810
Trinidad 340
 349
 363
 266
 313
 340
Other International (2)
 25
 30
 70
 30
 25
 25
Total 1,175
 1,265
 1,353
 1,219
 1,103
 1,175
Average Natural Gas Prices ($/Mcf) (3)
    
  
    
  
United States $1.60
 $1.97
 $3.93
 $2.88
 $2.20
 $1.60
Trinidad 1.88
 2.89
 3.65
 2.94
 2.38
 1.88
Other International (2)
 3.64
 5.05
 4.40
 4.08
 3.89
 3.64
Composite 1.73
 2.30
 3.88
 2.92
(4)2.29
 1.73
Crude Oil Equivalent Volumes (MBoed) (4)(5)
            
United States 494.9
 507.9
 515.0
 664.7
 551.0
 494.9
Trinidad 57.5
 59.1
 61.5
 45.1
 53.0
 57.5
Other International (2)
 7.6
 5.2
 18.2
 9.4
 4.9
 7.6
Total 560.0
 572.2
 594.7
 719.2
 608.9
 560.0
            
Total MMBoe (4)(5)
 205.0
 208.9
 217.1
 262.5
 222.3
 205.0
 
(1)Thousand barrels per day or million cubic feet per day, as applicable.
(2)Other International includes EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(3)Dollars per barrel or per thousand cubic feet, as applicable.  Excludes the impact of financial commodity derivative instruments (see Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements).
(4)Includes a positive revenue adjustment of $0.44 per Mcf related to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts with Customers" (ASU 2014-09) (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, EOG presents natural gas processing fees related to certain processing and marketing agreements as Gathering and Processing Costs, instead of as a deduction to Natural Gas revenues.
(5)Thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day or million barrels of oil equivalent, as applicable; includes crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas.  Crude oil equivalent volumes are determined using a ratio of 1.0 barrel of crude oil and condensate or NGLs to 6.0 thousand cubic feet of natural gas.  MMBoe is calculated by multiplying the MBoed amount by the number of days in the period and then dividing that amount by one thousand.


20162018 compared to 2015.2017. Wellhead crude oil and condensate revenues in 2016 decreased $6182018 increased $3,261 million, or 13%52%, to $4,317$9,517 million from $4,935$6,256 million in 2015,2017, due primarily to a lowerhigher composite average wellhead crude oil and condensate price.price ($2,088 million) and an increase in production ($1,173 million). EOG's composite wellhead crude oil and condensate price for 2016 decreased 12%2018 increased 28% to $41.76$65.21 per barrel compared to $47.53$50.91 per barrel in 2015.2017. Wellhead crude oil and condensate deliveriesproduction in 2016 decreased 1%2018 increased 19% to 283400 MBbld as compared to 284337 MBbld in 2015.2017. The decreasedincreased production was primarily due to lower production in the Eagle Ford and the Rocky Mountain area, largely offset by increased production in the Permian Basin.Basin and the Eagle Ford.

NGL revenues in 20162018 increased $29$398 million, or 7%55%, to $437$1,127 million from $408$729 million in 2015,2017 primarily due to an increase of 5in production ($229 million) and a higher composite average wellhead NGL price ($169 million). EOG's composite average wellhead NGL price increased 18% to $26.60 per barrel in 2018 compared to $22.61 per barrel in 2017. NGL production in 2018 increased 31% to 116 MBbld or 6%,as compared to 88 MBbld in NGL deliveries primarily as a result of2017. The increased production was primarily in the Permian Basin.Basin and the Eagle Ford.

Wellhead natural gas revenues in 2016 decreased $3192018 increased $380 million, or 30%41%, to $742$1,302 million from $1,061$922 million in 2015,2017, primarily due to a lowerhigher composite wellhead natural gas price ($246282 million) and a decreasean increase in wellhead natural gas deliveries ($7398 million). EOG's composite average wellhead natural gas price decreased 25%increased 28% to $1.73$2.92 per Mcf in 20162018 compared to $2.30$2.29 per Mcf in 2015.2017. This increase in composite wellhead natural gas prices includes a positive revenue adjustment of $0.44 per Mcf related to the adoption of ASU 2014-09. Natural gas deliveries in 2016 decreased 7%2018 increased 11% to 1,1751,219 MMcfd as compared to 1,2651,103 MMcfd in 2015.2017. The decreaseincrease in production was primarily due to decreasedincreased production in the United States (76(158 MMcfd), partially offset by decreased production in Trinidad (47 MMcfd). The decreasedincreased production in the United States was due primarily to lower volumes in the Fort Worth Barnett Shale, Upper Gulf Coast and South Texas areas, largely resulting from asset sales in these regions during the year, partially offset by increased production of associated gas in the Permian Basin and Rocky Mountain area and higher volumes in the acquisition of the Yates Entities.Marcellus Shale. The decrease in Trinidad was primarily attributable to higher contractual deliveries in 2017.

During 2016,2018, EOG recognized net losses on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts of $100$166 million, which included net cash paid for settlements of crude oil and natural gas financial derivative contracts of $22$259 million. During 2015,2017, EOG recognized net gains on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts of $62$20 million, which included net cash received from settlements of crude oil and natural gas financial derivative contracts of $730$7 million.

Gathering, processing and marketing revenues are revenues generated from sales of third-party crude oil, NGLs and natural gas, as well as gathering fees associated with gathering third-party natural gas and revenues from sales of EOG-owned sand. Purchases and sales of third-party crude oil and natural gas aremay be utilized in order to balance firm transportation capacity with production in certain areas and to utilize excess capacity at EOG-owned facilities. EOG sells sand in order to balance the timing of firm purchase agreements with completion operations and to utilize excess capacity at EOG-owned facilities. Marketing costs represent the costs of purchasingto purchase third-party crude oil, and natural gas and sand and the associated transportation costs, as well as costs associated with EOG-owned sand sold to third parties.

Gathering, processing and marketing revenues less marketing costs in 20162018 increased $91$59 million compared to 2015,2017, primarily due to higher margins on crude oil and condensate marketing activities and on sand sales.activities.

20152017 compared to 2014.2016. Wellhead crude oil and condensate revenues in 2015 decreased $4,8072017 increased $1,939 million, or 49%45%, to $4,935$6,256 million from $9,742$4,317 million in 2014,2016, due primarily to a lowerhigher composite average wellhead crude oil and condensate price ($4,6771,124 million) and a decrease of 5 MBbld, or 2%,an increase in wellhead crude oil and condensate deliveriesproduction ($131815 million). The decrease in deliveries primarily reflects decreased production in the North Dakota Bakken, the Fort Worth Barnett Shale area and Other International, partially offset by increased production in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford. The decrease in Other International is due to the sale of the Canadian assets. EOG's composite wellhead crude oil and condensate price for 2015 decreased 49%2017 increased 22% to $47.53$50.91 per barrel compared to $92.58$41.76 per barrel in 2014.2016. Wellhead crude oil and condensate deliveries in 2017 increased 19% to 337 MBbld as compared to 283 MBbld in 2016. The increased production was primarily due to higher production in the Permian Basin and Rocky Mountain area.

NGL revenues in 2015 decreased $5262017 increased $292 million, or 56%67%, to $408$729 million from $934$437 million in 2014,2016 primarily due to a lowerhigher composite averagewellhead NGL price ($490257 million) and a decrease of 3 MBbld, or 4%,an increase in NGL deliveriesproduction ($3635 million). EOG's composite average wellhead NGL price in 2015 decreasedincreased 55% to $14.49 per barrel compared to $31.91$22.61 per barrel in 2014.2017 compared to $14.63 per barrel in 2016. The increased production was primarily due to higher production in the Permian Basin and Rocky Mountain area, partially offset by decreased production in the Fort Worth Barnett Shale, largely resulting from 2016 asset sales in this region.



Wellhead natural gas revenues in 2015 decreased $8552017 increased $180 million, or 45%24%, to $1,061$922 million from $1,916$742 million in 2014,2016, primarily due to a lowerhigher composite wellhead natural gas price ($730227 million) and, partially offset by a decrease in wellhead natural gas deliveries ($12547 million). EOG's composite average wellhead natural gas price decreased 41%increased 32% to $2.30$2.29 per Mcf in 20152017 compared to $3.88$1.73 per Mcf in 2014.2016. Natural gas deliveries in 20152017 decreased 7%6% to 1,2651,103 MMcfd as compared to 1,3531,175 MMcfd in 2014.2016. The decrease in production was primarily due to decreased production in Other International (40 MMcfd), the United States (34(45 MMcfd) and Trinidad (14(27 MMcfd). InThe decreased production in the United States decreased production was due primarily to lower productionvolumes in the Upper Gulf Coast, Fort Worth Barnett Shale, Upper Gulf Coast and South Texas areas, largely resulting from 2016 asset sales in these regions, partially offset by increased production of associated gas in the Eagle FordPermian Basin and Permian Basin.Rocky Mountain area and from the 2016 mergers and related asset purchase transactions with Yates Petroleum Corporation and other affiliated entities (collectively, the Yates Entities). The declinedecrease in Other InternationalTrinidad was primarily reflects the sale of the Canadian assets.attributable to higher contractual deliveries in 2016.

During 2015,2017, EOG recognized net gains on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts of $62$20 million, which included net cash received from settlements of crude oil and natural gas financial derivative contracts of $730$7 million. During 2014,2016, EOG recognized net gainslosses on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts of $834$100 million, which included net cash received frompaid for settlements of crude oil and natural gas financial derivative contracts of $34$22 million.


Gathering, processing and marketing revenues less marketing costs in 2015 declined $532017 increased $9 million compared to 2014,2016, primarily due to higher margins on natural gas and NGL marketing activities ($16 million), partially offset by lower margins on crude oil and natural gas marketing activities and losses on sand sales.sales ($9 million).

Operating and Other Expenses

20162018 compared to 20152017.  During 2016,2018, operating expenses of $8,876$12,806 million were $6,568$2,524 million lowerhigher than the $15,444$10,282 million incurred during 2015.2017. Operating expenses for 2015 included impairments of proved properties; other property, plant and equipment; and other assets of $6,326 million primarily due to commodity price declines. The following table presents the costs per barrel of oil equivalent (Boe) for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
2016 20152018 2017
      
Lease and Well$4.53
 $5.66
$4.89
 $4.70
Transportation Costs3.73
 4.07
2.85
 3.33
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A) -      
Oil and Gas Properties16.77
 15.27
12.65
 14.83
Other Property, Plant and Equipment0.57
 0.59
0.44
 0.51
General and Administrative (G&A)1.93
 1.75
1.63
 1.95
Net Interest Expense1.37
 1.14
0.93
 1.23
Total (1)
$28.90
 $28.48
$23.39
 $26.55
 
(1)Total excludes gathering and processing costs, exploration costs, dry hole costs, impairments, marketing costs and taxes other than income.

The primary factors impacting the cost components of per-unit rates of lease and well, transportation costs, DD&A, G&A and net interest expense for 20162018 compared to 20152017 are set forth below.  See "Net Operating Revenues""Operating Revenues and Other" above for a discussion of production volumes.

Lease and well expenses include expenses for EOG-operated properties, as well as expenses billed to EOG from other operators where EOG is not the operator of a property.  Lease and well expenses can be divided into the following categories: costs to operate and maintain crude oil and natural gas wells, the cost of workovers and lease and well administrative expenses.  Operating and maintenance costs include, among other things, pumping services, salt water disposal, equipment repair and maintenance, compression expense, lease upkeep and fuel and power.  Workovers are operations to restore or maintain production from existing wells.

Each of these categories of costs individually fluctuates from time to time as EOG attempts to maintain and increase production while maintaining efficient, safe and environmentally responsible operations.  EOG continues to increase its operating activities by drilling new wells in existing and new areas.  Operating and maintenance costs within these existing and new areas, as well as the costs of services charged to EOG by vendors, fluctuate over time.



Lease and well expenses of $927$1,283 million in 2016 decreased $2552018 increased $238 million from $1,182$1,045 million in 20152017 primarily due to lowerhigher operating and maintenance costs ($218171 million), higher workover expenditures ($44 million) and lowerhigher lease and well administrative expenses ($3541 million), bothall in the United States.States, partially offset by lower operating and maintenance costs in the United Kingdom ($18 million). Lease and well expenses increased in the United States primarily due to increased operating activities resulting in increased production.

Transportation costs represent costs associated with the delivery of hydrocarbon products from the lease to a downstream point of sale.  Transportation costs include transportation fees, costs associated with crude-by-rail operations, the cost of compression (the cost of compressing natural gas to meet pipeline pressure requirements), dehydration (the cost associated with removing water from natural gas to meet pipeline requirements), gathering fees and fuel costs.

Transportation costs of $764$747 million in 2016 decreased $852018 increased $7 million from $849$740 million in 20152017 primarily due to increased transportation costs in the Permian Basin ($116 million), partially offset by decreased transportation costs in the Rocky Mountain area ($55 million), the Barnett Shale ($2152 million), the Eagle Ford ($1931 million) and the Upper Gulf Coast regionRocky Mountain area ($1025 million) primarily due to lower production and service cost reductions in these regions, partially offset by increased transportation costs related to higher production from the Permian Basin ($18 million).



DD&A of the cost of proved oil and gas properties is calculated using the unit-of-production method.  EOG's DD&A rate and expense are the composite of numerous individual DD&A group calculations.  There are several factors that can impact EOG's composite DD&A rate and expense, such as field production profiles, drilling or acquisition of new wells, disposition of existing wells and reserve revisions (upward or downward) primarily related to well performance, economic factors and impairments.  Changes to these factors may cause EOG's composite DD&A rate and expense to fluctuate from period to period.  DD&A of the cost of other property, plant and equipment is generally calculated using the straight-line depreciation method over the useful lives of the assets. 

DD&A expenses in 20162018 increased $239$26 million to $3,553$3,435 million from $3,314$3,409 million in 2015.2017.  DD&A expenses associated with oil and gas properties in 20162018 were $247$24 million higher than in 20152017 primarily due to higheran increase in production in the United States ($647 million) and the United Kingdom ($21 million), partially offset by lower unit rates in the United States ($300625 million) and Chinaa decrease in production in Trinidad ($316 million) and commencement of crude oil production from the Conwy field. Unit rates in the United KingdomStates decreased primarily due to upward reserve revisions and reserves added at lower costs as a result of increased efficiencies.

G&A expenses of $427 million in 2018 decreased $7 million from $434 million in 2017 primarily due to decreased professional, legal and other services ($2224 million); partially offset by increased employee-related expenses resulting from expanded operations ($15 million) and increased information systems costs ($10 million).

Net interest expense of $245 million in 2018 was $29 million lower than 2017 primarily due to repayment of the $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2017 in September 2017 ($25 million) and the $350 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2018 in October 2018 ($6 million), partially offset by a decrease in production in the United States ($68 million) and Trinidad ($4 million) and lower unit rates in Trinidad ($6 million). Unit rates in the United States increased primarily due to downward reserve revisions at December 31, 2015, as a result of lower commodity prices.

G&A expenses of $395 million in 2016 increased $28 million from $367 million in 2015 primarily due to employee-related expenses in connection with certain voluntary retirements and costs related to the Yates transaction.

Net interest expense of $282 million in 2016 was $45 million higher than 2015 primarily due to interest incurred on the Notes issued in January 2016 ($43 million), as well as a decrease in capitalized interest ($10 million). This was partially offset by the reduction of interest expense related to the debt repaid in February 2016 and June 2015 ($163 million).

Gathering and processing costs represent operating and maintenance expenses and administrative expenses associated with operating EOG's gathering and processing assets.assets and beginning January 1, 2018, natural gas processing fees from third parties. EOG pays third parties to process a portion of its natural gas production to extract NGLs. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion related to EOG's adoption of ASU 2014-09.

Gathering and processing costs decreased $23increased $288 million to $123$437 million in 20162018 compared to $146$149 million in 20152017 primarily due to decreased activitiesthe adoption of ASU 2014-09 ($204 million) and increased operating costs in the Permian Basin ($32 million), the United Kingdom ($28 million) and the Eagle Ford ($16 million) and the Barnett Shale ($725 million).

Exploration costs of $125 million in 2016 decreased $24 million from $149 million in 20152018 increased $4 million from $145 million in 2017 primarily due to increased general and administrative expenses in the United States ($7 million), partially offset by decreased geological and geophysical expenditures ($15 million) and lower exploration administrative expenses ($14 million), partially offset by higher delay rentalsin Trinidad ($5 million), all in the United States..



Impairments include amortization of unproved oil and gas property costs as well as impairments of proved oil and gas properties; other property, plant and equipment; and other assets.  Unproved properties with acquisition costs that are not individually significant are aggregated, and the portion of such costs estimated to be nonproductive is amortized over the remaining lease term.  Unproved properties with individually significant acquisition costs are reviewed individually for impairment. When circumstances indicate that a proved property may be impaired, EOG compares expected undiscounted future cash flows at a DD&A group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset.  If the expected undiscounted future cash flows are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, the capitalized cost is reduced to fair value.  Fair value is generally calculated by using the Income Approach described in the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).  In certain instances, EOG utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value.

The following table represents impairments of $620 million and $6,614 million for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 (in millions):

2016 20152018 2017
      
Proved properties$116
 $6,326
$121
 $224
Unproved properties291
 288
173
 211
Other assets49
 28
Other property, plant and equipment14
 

 16
Inventories61
 
4
 
Firm commitment contracts138
 
Total$620
 $6,614
$347
 $479

Impairments of proved properties were primarily due to the write-down to fair value of divested legacy natural gas assets in 20162018 and primarily due to commodity price declines in 2015. Impairments of unproved properties were primarily due to higher amortization rates being applied to undeveloped leasehold costs in response to the significant decrease in commodity prices and an increase in EOG's estimates of undeveloped properties not expected to be developed before lease expiration in 2016 and 2015. EOG recognized additional impairment charges in 2016 of $61 million related to obsolete inventory and $138 million related to firm commitment contracts related to divested Haynesville natural gas assets.2017.

Taxes other than income include severance/production taxes, ad valorem/property taxes, payroll taxes, franchise taxes and other miscellaneous taxes.  Severance/production taxes are generally determined based on wellhead revenues, and ad valorem/property taxes are generally determined based on the valuation of the underlying assets.

Taxes other than income in 2016 decreased $722018 increased $227 million to $350$772 million (6.4%(6.5% of wellhead revenues) from $422$545 million (6.6%(6.9% of wellhead revenues) in 2015.2017. The decreaseincrease in taxes other than income was primarily due to decreasesincreases in severance/production taxes ($190 million) primarily as a result of increased wellhead revenues and an increase in ad valorem/property taxes ($4933 million) and in severance/production taxes ($34 million), primarily as a result of decreased wellhead revenues, both in the United States. These decreases were partially offset by a decrease in credits available to EOG in 2016 for Texas high-cost gas severance tax rate reductions ($12 million).

Other expense,income, net, was $51$17 million in 20162018 compared to other income, net, of $2$9 million in 2015.2017. The increase of $53$8 million in 2018 was primarily due to a decrease in deferred compensation expense ($12 million) and an increase in interest income ($4 million); partially offset by an increase in foreign currency transaction losses and increased deferred compensation expense.($15 million).

EOG recognized an income tax benefitprovision of $461$822 million in 20162018 compared to an income tax benefit of $2,397$1,921 million in 2015,2017, primarily due to a decrease in pretax loss resulting from the absence of certain 2015 impairments.2017 tax benefits related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and higher pretax income. The most significant impact of the TCJA on EOG was the reduction in the statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21% which required the existing net United States federal deferred income tax liability to be remeasured resulting in the recognition of an income tax benefit in 2017 of approximately $2.2 billion. The net effective tax rate for 2016 decreased2018 increased to 30%19% from 35%(291%) in the prior year, primarily due to additional Trinidad taxes resulting from athe absence of the TCJA tax settlement reached in the second quarter of 2016 ($43 million).benefits.



20152017 compared to 20142016.  During 2015,2017, operating expenses of $15,444$10,282 million were $2,650$1,406 million higher than the $12,794$8,876 million incurred during 2014.2016. Operating expenses for 2015 included impairments of proved properties, other property, plant and equipment and other assets of $6,326 million primarily due to commodity price declines. The following table presents the costs per barrel of oil equivalent (Boe) for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014:2016:
2015 20142017 2016
      
Lease and Well$5.66
 $6.53
$4.70
 $4.53
Transportation Costs4.07
 4.48
3.33
 3.73
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A) -      
Oil and Gas Properties15.27
 17.90
14.83
 16.77
Other Property, Plant and Equipment0.59
 0.53
0.51
 0.57
General and Administrative (G&A)1.75
 1.85
1.95
 1.93
Net Interest Expense1.14
 0.93
1.23
 1.37
Total (1)
$28.48
 $32.22
$26.55
 $28.90
 
(1)Total excludes gathering and processing costs, exploration costs, dry hole costs, impairments, marketing costs and taxes other than income.

The primary factors impacting the cost components of per-unit rates of lease and well, transportation costs, DD&A, G&A and net interest expense for 20152017 compared to 20142016 are set forth below.  See "Net Operating Revenues""Operating Revenues and Other" above for a discussion of production volumes.

Lease and well expenses of $1,182$1,045 million in 2015 decreased $2342017 increased $118 million from $1,416$927 million in 20142016 primarily due to lowerhigher operating and maintenance costs in the United States ($12571 million), lower lease and well expenses in Other Internationalthe United Kingdom ($9930 million) primarily due to the sale of the Canadian assets and lowerhigher workover expenditures in the United States ($21 million), partially offset by increased lease. Lease and well administrative expenses increased in the United States ($12 million).primarily due to increased operating activities resulting in increased production.

Transportation costs of $849$740 million in 20152017 decreased $123$24 million from $972$764 million in 20142016 primarily due to divestitures in the Barnett Shale and Upper Gulf Coast ($85 million) and decreased transportation costs in the Rocky Mountain areaEagle Ford ($818 million) and the Eagle FordUnited Kingdom ($488 million) primarily due to an increase in the use of pipelines to transport crude oil production,, partially offset by increased transportation costs related to higher production fromin the Permian Basin ($1947 million) and the Rocky Mountain area ($20 million) and from the 2016 transactions with the Yates Entities ($13 million).



DD&A expenses in 20152017 decreased $683$144 million to $3,314$3,409 million from $3,997$3,553 million in 2014.2016.  DD&A expenses associated with oil and gas properties in 20152017 were $691$141 million lower than in 20142016 primarily due to lower unit rates in the United States ($513449 million) and Trinidad ($2819 million), and a decrease in production in the United StatesKingdom ($4416 million) and lower DD&A expenseTrinidad ($11 million), partially offset by an increase in Other Internationalproduction in the United States ($104354 million) primarily due to the sale of the Canadian assets.. Unit rates in the United States decreased primarily due to impairments of proved oil and gas properties (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), upward reserve revisions and reserves added at lower costs as a result of increased efficiencies.

G&A expenses of $367$434 million in 2015 were $352017 increased $39 million lower than 2014from $395 million in 2016 primarily due to lowerincreased employee-related expenses.expenses resulting from expanded operations and from the 2016 transactions with the Yates Entities ($45 million) and increased professional, legal and other services ($30 million), partially offset by 2016 employee related expenses in connection with certain voluntary retirements ($42 million).

Net interest expense of $237$274 million in 20152017 was $36$8 million higherlower than 20142016 primarily due to interest incurred onrepayment of the $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes issueddue 2017 in March 2015September 2017 ($2811 million), as well aspartially offset by a decrease in capitalized interest ($154 million). This was partially offset by

Gathering and processing costs increased $26 million to $149 million in 2017 compared to $123 million in 2016 due to increased activities in the reduction of interest on debt repaid in June 2015Permian Basin ($12 million) and during 2014the Rocky Mountain area ($118 million).

Exploration costs of $149$145 million in 2015 decreased $352017 increased $20 million from $184$125 million in 20142016 primarily due to decreasedincreased geological and geophysical expenditures in Trinidad.



The following table represents impairments for the United States ($19 million)years ended December 31, 2017 and lower exploration administrative expenses in Other International ($10 million)2016 (in millions):
 2017 2016
    
Proved properties$224
 $116
Unproved properties211
 291
Other assets28
 
Other property, plant and equipment16
 14
Inventories
 61
Firm commitment contracts
 138
Total$479
 $620

Impairments of proved properties were primarily due to the salewrite-down to fair value of the Canadian assets.

Impairments of $6,614 million in 2015 increased $5,870 million from $744 million in 2014 primarily due to increased impairments of proved properties and other assets in the United States ($5,959 million), primarily due to commodity price declines; and increased amortization of unproved property costs in the United States ($112 million), which was caused by higher amortization rates being applied to undeveloped leasehold costs in response to the significant decrease in commodity prices and an increase in EOG's estimates of undeveloped properties not expected to be developed before lease expiration; partially offset by decreased impairments of proved properties in the United Kingdom ($156 million) and Argentina ($43 million). Proved property and other asset impairments in the United States were primarily related todivested legacy natural gas assets in 2017 and marginal liquids plays.2016. EOG recorded impairmentsrecognized additional impairment charges in 2016 of proved properties; other property, plant$61 million related to obsolete inventory and equipment; and other assets of $6,326$138 million and $575 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.related to firm commitment contracts related to divested Haynesville natural gas assets.

Taxes other than income in 2015 decreased $3362017 increased $195 million to $422$545 million (6.6%(6.9% of wellhead revenues) from $758$350 million (6.0%(6.4% of wellhead revenues) in 2014.2016. The decreaseincrease in taxes other than income was primarily due to decreasesincreases in severance/production taxes ($307171 million) and in ad valorem/property taxes ($18 million), both primarily as a result of decreasedincreased wellhead revenues and lower ad valorem/property taxes ($17 million), both in the United States.

Other income, net, was $2$9 million in 20152017 compared to other expense, net, of $45$51 million in 2014.2016. The increase of $47$60 million was primarily due to a decreasean increase in net foreign currency transaction lossesgains in 2017 ($49 million) and decreased deferred compensation expense.interest income ($5 million).

EOG recognized an income tax benefit of $2,397$1,921 million in 20152017 compared to an income tax expensebenefit of $2,080$461 million in 20142016, primarily due to impairments recognizedthe enactment of the TCJA in December 2017. The most significant impact of the TCJA on EOG was the reduction in the statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, which required the existing net United States federal deferred income tax liability to be remeasured, resulting in 2015. Thethe recognition of an income tax benefit of approximately $2.2 billion.  Due largely to this tax rate reduction, the net effective tax rate for 20152017 decreased to 35%(291)% from 42%30% in the prior year primarily due to the effects of recording valuation allowances in the United Kingdom and deferred tax in the United States related to undistributed foreign earnings in 2014.year. 

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Cash Flow

The primary sources of cash for EOG during the three-year period ended December 31, 2016,2018, were funds generated from operations net proceeds from issuances of long-term debt,and proceeds from asset sales, excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation and net commercial paper borrowings and borrowings under other uncommitted credit facilities.sales.  The primary uses of cash were funds used in operations; exploration and development expenditures; other property, plant and equipment expenditures; repayments of debt; dividend payments to stockholders; repayments of debt; and purchases of treasury stock in connection with stock compensation plans.

20162018 compared to 2015.2017.  Net cash provided by operating activities of $2,359$7,769 million in 2016 decreased $1,2362018 increased $3,504 million from $3,595$4,265 million in 20152017 primarily reflecting a decreasean increase in wellhead revenues ($9074,039 million), an unfavorable change in the net cash received from the settlement of financial commodity derivative contracts ($752 million), unfavorablefavorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities ($197 million) and an increase in net cash paid for interest expense ($30 million), partially offset by a decrease in cash operating expenses ($442758 million) and a decreasefavorable change in netthe cash paid for income taxes ($80113 million), partially offset by an increase in cash operating expenses ($746 million) and an unfavorable change in the net cash paid for the settlement of financial commodity derivative contracts ($266 million).



Net cash used in investing activities of $1,253$6,170 million in 2016 decreased2018 increased by $4,067$2,183 million from $5,320$3,987 million in 20152017 primarily due to a decreasean increase in additions to oil and gas properties ($2,2351,888 million); an increase in proceeds from asset sales ($926 million); favorableunfavorable changes in working capital associated with investing activities ($656211 million); a decreaseand an increase in additions to other property, plant and equipment ($195 million); and net cash received from the Yates transaction ($5564 million).

Net cash used forin financing activities of $243$839 million in 20162018 included cash dividend payments ($438 million), repayments of long-term debt ($564 million), cash dividend payments ($373 million), net commercial paper repayments ($260350 million) and purchases of treasury stock in connection with stock compensation plans ($8263 million). Cash provided by financing activities in 20162018 included net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes ($991 million), excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation ($29 million) and proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock purchase plan activity ($2321 million). 



20152017 compared to 2014.2016.  Net cash provided by operating activities of $3,595$4,265 million in 2015 decreased $5,0542017 increased $1,906 million from $8,649$2,359 million in 20142016 primarily reflecting a decreasean increase in wellhead revenues ($6,188 million), unfavorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities ($5912,411 million) and an increase in net cash paid for interest expense ($25 million), partially offset by a decrease in cash operating expenses ($741 million), a favorable change in the net cash received from the settlement of financial commodity derivative contracts ($69630 million) and a decrease, partially offset by an increase in cash operating expenses ($362 million), an increase in net cash paid for income taxes ($302228 million), an increase in net cash paid for interest expense ($23 million) and unfavorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities ($10 million).

Net cash used in investing activities of $5,320$3,987 million in 2015 decreased2017 increased by $2,194$2,734 million from $7,514$1,253 million in 20142016 primarily due to a decreasean increase in additions to oil and gas properties ($2,7951,461 million); and a decrease in additions to other property, plant and equipmentproceeds from asset sales ($439892 million); partially offset by unfavorable changes in working capital associated with investing activities ($603246 million); a decreaseand an increase in proceeds from sales of assetsadditions to other property, plant and equipment ($377 million) and the release of restricted cash in 2014 ($6080 million).

Net cash provided by financing activities of $371 million in 2015 included net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes ($990 million), net commercial paper borrowings ($260 million), excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation ($26 million) and proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock purchase plan activity ($23 million). Cash used in financing activities of $1,036 million in 20152017 included repayments of long-term debt ($500600 million), cash dividend payments ($367387 million) and purchases of treasury stock in connection with stock compensation plans ($4963 million). Cash provided by financing activities in 2017 included proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock purchase plan activity ($21 million). 

Total Expenditures

The table below sets out components of total expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Expenditure Category          
Capital          
Exploration and Development Drilling$1,957
 $3,289
 $5,543
$4,935
 $3,132
 $1,957
Facilities375
 765
 1,367
625
 575
 375
Leasehold Acquisitions (1)
3,217
 134
 370
488
 427
 3,217
Property Acquisitions (2)
749
 481
 139
124
 73
 749
Capitalized Interest31
 42
 57
24
 27
 31
Subtotal6,329
 4,711
 7,476
6,196
 4,234
 6,329
Exploration Costs125
 149
 184
149
 145
 125
Dry Hole Costs11
 15
 49
5
 5
 11
Exploration and Development Expenditures6,465
 4,875
 7,709
6,350
 4,384
 6,465
Asset Retirement Costs(20) 53
 196
70
 56
 (20)
Total Exploration and Development Expenditures6,445
 4,928
 7,905
6,420
 4,440
 6,445
Other Property, Plant and Equipment (3)
109
 288
 727
286
 173
 109
Total Expenditures$6,554
 $5,216
 $8,632
$6,706
 $4,613
 $6,554
 
(1)Leasehold acquisitions included $291 million and $256 million related to non-cash property exchanges in 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $3,115 million in 2016 related to the Yates transaction and $5 million in 2014 related to non-cash property exchanges.transaction.
(2)Property acquisitions included $71 million and $26 million related to non-cash property exchanges in 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $735 million in 2016 related to the Yates transaction.
(3)Other property, plant and equipment included $49 million of non-cash additions in 2018 primarily related to a capital lease transaction in the Permian Basin and $17 million in 2016 related to the Yates transaction.



Exploration and development expenditures of $6,465$6,350 million for 20162018 were $1,590$1,966 million higher than the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increased exploration and development drilling expenditures in the United States ($1,932 million) and Other International ($11 million), increased leasehold acquisitions ($3,08361 million), increased property acquisitions ($51 million) and increased property acquisitionsfacility expenditures ($26850 million), partially offset by decreased exploration and development drilling expenditures in the United States ($1,280 million), Trinidad ($46140 million). The 2018 exploration and Other International ($6 million); decreaseddevelopment expenditures of $6,350 million included $5,546 million in development drilling and facilities, $656 million in exploration, $124 million in property acquisitions and $24 million in capitalized interest. The 2017 exploration and development expenditures ($390 million); decreased geologicalof $4,384 million included $3,661 million in development drilling and geophysical expenditures ($15 million);facilities, $623 million in exploration, $73 million in property acquisitions and decreased$27 million in capitalized interest ($11 million).interest. The 2016 exploration and development expenditures of $6,465 million included $3,351 million in exploration, $2,334 million in development drilling and facilities, $749 million in property acquisitions and $31 million in capitalized interest. The 2015 exploration and development expenditures of $4,875 million included $4,007 million in development drilling and facilities, $481 million in property acquisitions, $345 million in exploration and $42 million in capitalized interest. The 2014 exploration and development expenditures of $7,709 million included $6,804 million in development drilling and facilities, $709 million in exploration, $139 million in property acquisitions and $57 million in capitalized interest.



The level of exploration and development expenditures, including acquisitions, will vary in future periods depending on energy market conditions and other related economic factors.  EOG has significant flexibility with respect to financing alternatives and the ability to adjust its exploration and development expenditure budget as circumstances warrant.  While EOG has certain continuing commitments associated with expenditure plans related to its operations, such commitments are not expected to be material when considered in relation to the total financial capacity of EOG.

Derivative Transactions

Commodity Derivative Contracts.  Prices received by EOG for its crude oil production generally vary from U.S. New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) West Texas Intermediate prices due to adjustments for delivery location (basis) and other factors. EOG has entered into crude oil basis swap contracts in order to fix the differential between pricing in Midland, Texas, and Cushing, Oklahoma (Midland Differential). Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's Midland Differential basis swap contracts through February 19, 2019. The weighted average price differential expressed in dollars per barrel ($/Bbl) represents the amount of reduction to Cushing, Oklahoma, prices for the notional volumes expressed in barrels per day (Bbld) covered by the basis swap contracts.
 Midland Differential Basis Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) 
Weighted Average Price Differential
($/Bbl)
 
 
 2018    
 January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (closed) 15,000
 $1.063
      
 2019    
 January 1, 2019 through February 28, 2019 (closed) 20,000
 $1.075
 March 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 20,000
 1.075

EOG has also entered into crude oil basis swap contracts in order to fix the differential between pricing in the U.S. Gulf Coast and Cushing, Oklahoma (Gulf Coast Differential). Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's Gulf Coast Differential basis swap contracts through February 19, 2019. The weighted average price differential expressed in $/Bbl represents the amount of addition to Cushing, Oklahoma, prices for the notional volumes expressed in Bbld covered by the basis swap contracts.
 Gulf Coast Differential Basis Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) 
Weighted Average Price Differential
($/Bbl)
 
 
 2018    
 January 1, 2018 through September 30, 2018 (closed) 37,000
 $3.818
 October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (closed) 52,000
 3.911
      
 2019    
 January 1, 2019 through February 28, 2019 (closed) 13,000
 $5.572
 March 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 13,000
 5.572

Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's crude oil price swap contracts through February 20, 2017, with notional volumes expressed in barrels per day (Bbld) and prices expressed in dollars per barrel ($/Bbl).

 Crude Oil Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) Weighted Average Price ($/Bbl)
 
 
 2016    
 April 12, 2016 through April 30, 2016 (closed) 90,000
 $42.30
 May 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 (closed) 128,000
 42.56
      
 2017    
 January 2017 (closed) 35,000
 $50.04
 February 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 35,000
 50.04

EOG has entered into crude oil collar contracts, which establish ceiling and floor prices for the sale of notional volumes of crude oil as specified in the collar contracts. The collars require that EOG pay the difference between the ceiling price and the average U.S. New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) West Texas Intermediate crude oil price for the contract month (Index Price) in the event the Index Price is above the ceiling price. The collars grant EOG the right to receive the difference between the floor price and the Index Price in the event the Index Price is below the floor price. Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's crude oil collar contracts through February 20, 2017,19, 2019, with notional volumes expressed in Bbld and prices expressed in $/Bbl.

Crude Oil Collar Contracts
   Weighted Average Price ($/Bbl)
 Volume (Bbld) Ceiling Price Floor Price
2016     
September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (closed)70,000
 $54.25
 $45.00
 Crude Oil Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) Weighted Average Price ($/Bbl)
 
 
 2018    
 January 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 (closed) 134,000
 $60.04



On November 20, 2018, EOG entered into crude oil price swap contracts for the period December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, with notional volumes of 134,000 Bbld at an average price of $53.75 per Bbl. These contracts offset the crude oil price swap contracts for the same time period with notional volumes of 134,000 Bbld at an average price of $60.04 per Bbl. The net cash EOG received for settling these contracts was $26.1 million. The offsetting contracts are excluded from the above table.

Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's natural gas price swap contracts through February 20, 2017,19, 2019, with notional volumes expressed in million British thermal units (MMBtu) per day (MMBtud) and prices expressed in dollars per MMBtu ($/MMBtu).

 Natural Gas Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (MMBtud) Weighted Average Price ($/MMBtu)
 
 
 2016    
 March 1, 2016 through August 31, 2016 (closed) 60,000
 $2.49
      
 2017    
 March 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017 30,000
 $3.10
      
 2018    
 March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 35,000
 $3.00
 Natural Gas Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (MMBtud) Weighted Average Price ($/MMBtu)
 
 
 2018    
 March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 (closed) 35,000
 $3.00

EOG has sold call options which establish a ceiling price for the sale of notional volumes of natural gas as specified in the call option contracts. The call options require that EOG pay the difference between the call option strike price and either the average or last business day NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price for the contract month (Henry Hub Index Price) in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is above the call option strike price.

In addition, EOG has purchased put options which establish a floor price for the sale of notional volumes of natural gas as specified in the put option contracts. The put options grant EOG the right to receive the difference between the put option strike price and the Henry Hub Index Price in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is below the put option strike price. Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's natural gas call and put option contracts through February 20, 2017,19, 2019, with notional volumes expressed in MMBtud and prices expressed in $/MMBtu.

Natural Gas Option Contracts
 Call Options Sold Put Options Purchased
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
2016       
September 2016 (closed)56,250
 $3.46
 
 $
October 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016 (closed)106,250
 3.48
 
 
        
2017       
March 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017213,750
 $3.44
 171,000
 $2.92
        
2018       
March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018120,000
 $3.38
 96,000
 $2.94



EOG has also entered into natural gas collar contracts, which establish ceiling and floor prices for the sale of notional volumes of natural gas as specified in the collar contracts. The collars require that EOG pay the difference between the ceiling price and the Henry Hub Index Price in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is above the ceiling price. The collars grant EOG the right to receive the difference between the floor price and the Henry Hub Index Price in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is below the floor price. Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's natural gas collar contracts through February 20, 2017, with notional volumes expressed in MMBtud and prices expressed in $/MMbtu.

Natural Gas Collar Contracts
   Weighted Average Price ($/MMbtu)
 Volume (MMBtud) Ceiling Price Floor Price
2017     
March 1, 2017 through November 30, 201780,000
 $3.69
 $3.20
Natural Gas Option Contracts
 Call Options Sold Put Options Purchased
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
2018       
March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 (closed)120,000
 $3.38
 96,000
 $2.94

Financing

EOG's debt-to-total capitalization ratio was 33%24% at December 31, 2016,2018, compared to 34%28% at December 31, 2015.2017.  As used in this calculation, total capitalization represents the sum of total current and long-term debt and total stockholders' equity.

At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, EOG had outstanding $6,990$6,040 million and $6,390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes which had estimated fair values of $7,190$6,027 million and $6,524$6,602 million, respectively.  The estimated fair value was based upon quoted market prices and, where such prices were not available, other observable inputs regarding interest rates available to EOG at year-end.  EOG's debt is at fixed interest rates.  While changes in interest rates affect the fair value of EOG's senior notes, such changes do not expose EOG to material fluctuations in earnings or cash flow.

During 2016,2018, EOG funded its capital program primarily by utilizing cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from the issuance of the Notes, proceeds from asset sales and cash provided by borrowings from its commercial paper program.  While EOG maintains a $2.0 billion commercial paper program, the maximum outstanding at any time during 20162018 was $604$208 million, and the amount outstanding at year-end was zero.  There were no amounts outstanding under uncommitted credit facilities during 2016.2018. The average borrowings outstanding under the commercial paper program and the uncommitted credit facilities were $130$8 million and zero, respectively, during the year 2016.2018.  EOG considers this excess availability, which is backed by its $2.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility described in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements, to be sufficient to meet its ongoing operating needs.



Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes EOG's contractual obligations at December 31, 2016,2018, (in thousands):
Contractual Obligations (1)
 Total 2017 2018 - 2019 2020 - 2021 2022 & Beyond
Contractual Obligations (1) (2)
 Total 2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 2024 & Beyond
                    
Current and Long-Term Debt $6,990,000
 $600,000
 $1,250,000
 $1,750,000
 $3,390,000
 $6,040,000
 $900,000
 $1,750,000
 $1,250,000
 $2,140,000
Capital Lease 38,904
 6,708
 13,804
 14,619
 3,773
 71,571
 13,384
 27,560
 17,529
 13,098
Non-Cancelable Operating Leases 376,883
 89,617
 109,856
 69,462
 107,948
 555,692
 175,787
 218,995
 90,608
 70,302
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease 1,831,087
 297,257
 474,315
 306,435
 753,080
 1,276,530
 213,776
 308,379
 227,185
 527,190
Transportation and Storage Service Commitments (2)(3)
 3,427,990
 827,050
 1,321,304
 717,338
 562,298
 3,781,178
 898,491
 1,370,060
 880,057
 632,570
Drilling Rig Commitments (3)(4)
 207,200
 137,897
 67,803
 
 1,500
 391,459
 262,404
 126,398
 2,657
 
Seismic Purchase Obligations 8,621
 8,621
 
 
 
 6,898
 6,898
 
 
 
Fracturing Services Obligations 156,345
 82,178
 72,167
 310
 1,690
 1,048,517
 421,873
 460,088
 164,041
 2,515
Other Purchase Obligations 100,608
 55,729
 36,359
 7,669
 851
 1,024,301
 385,525
 237,771
 175,250
 225,755
Total Contractual Obligations $13,137,638
 $2,105,057
 $3,345,608
 $2,865,833
 $4,821,140
 $14,196,146
 $3,278,138
 $4,499,251
 $2,807,327
 $3,611,430
 
(1)This table does not include the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, EOG's pension or postretirement benefit obligations or liability for dismantlement, abandonment and asset retirement obligations (see Notes 6, 7 and 15, respectively, to Consolidated Financial Statements). These amounts are excluded because they are subject to estimates and the timing of settlement is unknown.
(2)This table does not include the liability for commitments to purchase fixed quantities of crude oil and natural gas. The amounts are excluded because they are variable and based on future commodity prices. At December 31, 2018, EOG is committed to purchase 3.6 MMBbls of crude oil and 15 Bcf of natural gas in 2019.
(3)Amounts shown are based on current transportation and storage rates and the foreign currency exchange rates used to convert Canadian dollars and British pounds into United States dollars at December 31, 2016.2018.  Management does not believe that any future changes in these rates before the expiration dates of these commitments will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of EOG.
(3)(4)Amounts shown represent minimum future expenditures for drilling rig services.  EOG's expenditures for drilling rig services will exceed such minimum amounts to the extent EOG utilizes the drilling rigs subject to a particular contractual commitment for a period greater than the period set forth in the governing contract or if EOG utilizes drilling rigs in addition to the drilling rigs subject to the particular contractual commitment (for example, pursuant to the exercise of an option to utilize additional drilling rigs provided for in the governing contract).

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

EOG does not participate in financial transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships.  Such entities or partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities (VIE) or special purpose entities (SPE), are generally established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other limited purposes. EOG was not involved in any unconsolidated VIE or SPE financial transactions or any other "off-balance sheet arrangement" (as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) during any of the periods covered by this report and currently has no intention of participating in any such transaction or arrangement in the foreseeable future.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

During 2016,2018, EOG was exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in its operations in foreign countries, including Trinidad, the United Kingdom, China and Canada and, Argentina.through November 2018, the U.K.  The foreign currency most significant to EOG's operations during 20162018 was the British pound.  EOG continues to monitor the foreign currency exchange rates of countries in which it is currently conducting business and may implement measures to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risk.



Outlook

Pricing.  Crude oil and natural gas prices have been volatile, and this volatility is expected to continue.  As a result of the many uncertainties associated with the world political environment, worldwide supplies of, and demand for, crude oil and condensate, NGL and natural gas, the availabilities of other worldwide energy supplies and the relative competitive relationships of the various energy sources in the view of consumers, EOG is unable to predict what changes may occur in crude oil and condensate, NGLs, natural gas, ammonia and methanol prices in the future.  The market price of crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas in 20172019 will impact the amount of cash generated from EOG's operating activities, which will in turn impact EOG's financial position. As of February 17, 2017,19, 2019, the average 20172019 NYMEX crude oil and natural gas prices were $54.16$57.15 per barrel and $3.19$2.89 per MMBtu, respectively, representing increasesa decrease of 25%12% for crude oil and 31%, respectively,a decrease of 6% for natural gas from the average NYMEX prices in 2016.2018. See ITEM 1A, Risk Factors.

Including the impact of EOG's 2017 crude oil derivative contracts (exclusive of options) and basedBased on EOG's tax position, EOG's price sensitivity (exclusive of basis swaps) in 20172019 for each $1.00 per barrel increase or decrease in wellhead crude oil and condensate price, combined with the estimated change in NGL price, is approximately $77$133 million for net income and $96$173 million for pretax cash flows from operating activities.  Including the impact of EOG's 2017 natural gas derivative contracts (exclusive of options) and basedBased on EOG's tax position and the portion of EOG's anticipated natural gas volumes for 20172019 for which prices have not been determined under long-term marketing contracts, EOG's price sensitivity for each $0.10 per Mcf increase or decrease in wellhead natural gas price is approximately $12$29 million for net income and $15$37 million for pretax cash flows from operating activities.  For information regarding EOG's crude oil and natural gas financial commodity derivative contracts through February 20, 2017,19, 2019, see "Derivative Transactions" above.

Capital. EOG plans to continue to focus a substantial portion of its exploration and development expenditures in its major producing areas in the United States. In particular, EOG will be focused on United States crude oil drilling activity in its Eagle Ford, Delaware Basin and Rocky Mountain area where it generates its highest rates-of-return. To further enhance the economics of these plays, EOG expects to continue to improve well performance and lower drilling and completion costs through efficiency gains and lower service costs.
 
The total anticipated 20172019 capital expenditures of approximately $3.7$6.1 billion to $4.1$6.5 billion, excluding acquisitions and non-cash exchanges, is structured to maintain EOG's strategy of capital discipline by funding its exploration, development and exploitation activities primarily from available internally generated cash flows and cash on hand. EOG has significant flexibility with respect to financing alternatives, including borrowings under its commercial paper program and other uncommitted credit facilities, bank borrowings, borrowings under its $2.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility and equity and debt offerings.
 
Operations. In 2017,2019, both total production and total crude oil production are expected to increase from 20162018 levels. In 2017,2019, EOG expects to continue to focus on reducing operating costs through efficiency improvements.




Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

EOG prepares its financial statements and the accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and the accompanying notes.  EOG identifies certain accounting policies as critical based on, among other things, their impact on the portrayal of EOG's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, and the degree of difficulty, subjectivity and complexity in their application.  Critical accounting policies cover accounting matters that are inherently uncertain because the future resolution of such matters is unknown.  Management routinely discusses the development, selection and disclosure of each of the critical accounting policies.  Following is a discussion of EOG's most critical accounting policies:

Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

EOG's engineers estimate proved oil and gas reserves in accordance with United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations, which directly impact financial accounting estimates, including depreciation, depletion and amortization and impairments of proved properties and related assets.  Proved reserves represent estimated quantities of crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under economic and operating conditions existing at the time the estimates were made.  The process of estimating quantities of proved oil and gas reserves is complex, requiring significant subjective decisions in the evaluation of all available geological, engineering and economic data for each reservoir.  The data for a given reservoir may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity, evolving production history and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions.  Consequently, material revisions (upward or downward) to existing reserve estimates may occur from time to time.  For related discussion, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors, and "Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial Statements."

Oil and Gas Exploration Costs

EOG accounts for its crude oil and natural gas exploration and production activities under the successful efforts method of accounting.  Oil and gas exploration costs, other than the costs of drilling exploratory wells, are charged to expenseexpensed as incurred.  The costs of drilling exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether EOG has discovered proved commercial reserves.  If proved commercial reserves are not discovered, such drilling costs are expensed.  In some circumstances, it may be uncertain whether proved commercial reserves have been discovered when drilling has been completed.  Such exploratory well drilling costs may continue to be capitalized if the reserve quantity is sufficient to justify its completion as a producing well and sufficient progress in assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project is being made.  Costs to develop proved reserves, including the costs of all development wells and related equipment used in the production of crude oil and natural gas, are capitalized.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization for Oil and Gas Properties

The quantities of estimated proved oil and gas reserves are a significant component of EOG's calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, and revisions in such estimates may alter the rate of future expense. Holding all other factors constant, if reserves were revised upward or downward, earnings would increase or decrease, respectively.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of the cost of proved oil and gas properties is calculated using the unit-of-production method.  The reserve base used to calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization for leasehold acquisition costs and the cost to acquire proved properties is the sum of proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves.  With respect to lease and well equipment costs, which include development costs and successful exploration drilling costs, the reserve base includes only proved developed reserves.  Estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are taken into account.

Oil and gas properties are grouped in accordance with the provisions of the Extractive Industries - Oil and Gas Topic of the ASC.  The basis for grouping is a reasonable aggregation of properties with a common geological structural feature or stratigraphic condition, such as a reservoir or field.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization rates are updated quarterly to reflect the addition of capital costs, reserve revisions (upwards or downwards) and additions, property acquisitions and/or property dispositions and impairments.

Depreciation and amortization of other property, plant and equipment is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.


Impairments

Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are capitalized when incurred.  Unproved properties with acquisition costs that are not individually significant are aggregated, and the portion of such costs estimated to be nonproductive is amortized over the remaining lease term.  Unproved properties with individually significant acquisition costs are reviewed individually for impairment. If the unproved properties are determined to be productive, the appropriate related costs are transferred to proved oil and gas properties.  Lease rentals are expensed as incurred.

When circumstances indicate that proved oil and gas properties may be impaired, EOG compares expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation, depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset.  If the expected undiscounted future cash flows, based on EOG's estimates of (and assumptions regarding) future crude oil and natural gas prices, operating costs, development expenditures, anticipated production from proved reserves and other relevant data, are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, the capitalized cost is reduced to fair value.  Fair value is generally calculated using the Income Approach described in the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the ASC.  In certain instances, EOG utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value.  Estimates of undiscounted future cash flows require significant judgment, and the assumptions used in preparing such estimates are inherently uncertain. In addition, such assumptions and estimates are reasonably likely to change in the future. 

Crude oil and natural gas prices have exhibited significant volatility in the past, and EOG expects that volatility to continue in the future.  During the five years ended December 31, 2016,2018, West Texas Intermediate crude oil spot prices have fluctuated from approximately $26.19 per barrel to $110.62$107.95 per barrel, and Henry Hub natural gas spot prices have ranged from approximately $1.49 per MMBtu to $8.15 per MMBtu.  EOG uses the five-year NYMEX futures strip for West Texas Intermediate crude oil and Henry Hub natural gas (in each case as of the applicable balance sheet date) as a basis to estimate future crude oil and natural gas prices. EOG's proved reserves estimates, including the timing of future production, are also subject to significant assumptions and judgment, and are frequently revised (upwards and downwards) as more information becomes available.  Proved reserves are estimated using a trailing 12-month average price, in accordance with SEC rules. In the future, if any combination of crude oil prices, natural gas prices, actual production or operating costs diverge negatively from EOG's current estimates, impairment charges and downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves may be necessary.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability approach.  Under this approach, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.  EOG assesses the realizability of deferred tax assets and recognizes valuation allowances as appropriate.  Significant assumptions used in estimating future taxable income include future oil and gas prices and changes in tax rates.levels of capital reinvestment.  Changes in such assumptions or changes in tax laws and regulations could materially affect the recognized amounts of valuation allowances.

Stock-Based Compensation

In accounting for stock-based compensation, judgments and estimates are made regarding, among other things, the appropriate valuation methodology to follow in valuing stock compensation awards and the related inputs required by those valuation methodologies. Assumptions regarding expected volatility of EOG's common stock, the level of risk-free interest rates, expected dividend yields on EOG's common stock, the expected term of the awards, expected volatility ofin the price of shares of EOG's peer companies and other valuation inputs are subject to change. Any such changes could result in different valuations and thus impact the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income.Income (Loss).



Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, including, among others, statements and projections regarding EOG's future financial position, operations, performance, business strategy, returns, budgets, reserves, levels of production, capital expenditures, costs and asset sales, statements regarding future commodity prices and statements regarding the plans and objectives of EOG's management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. EOG typically uses words such as "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," "strategy," "intend," "plan," "target," “aims,” "goal," "may," "will," "should" and "believe" or the negative of those terms or other variations or comparable terminology to identify its forward-looking statements. In particular, statements, express or implied, concerning EOG's future operating results and returns or EOG's ability to replace or increase reserves, increase production, generate returns, replace or increase drilling locations, reduce or otherwise control operating costs and capital costs,expenditures, generate income or cash flows, pay down or refinance indebtedness or pay and/or increase dividends are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. Although EOG believes the expectations reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable and are based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these assumptions are accurate or that any of these expectations will be achieved (in full or at all) or will prove to have been correct. Moreover, EOG's forward-looking statements may be affected by known, unknown or currently unforeseen risks, events or circumstances that may be outside EOG's control. Important factors that could cause EOG's actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in EOG's forward-looking statements include, among others:

the timing, extent and duration of changes in prices for, supplies of, and demand for, crude oil and condensate, natural gas liquids, natural gas and related commodities;
the extent to which EOG is successful in its efforts to acquire or discover additional reserves;
the extent to which EOG is successful in its efforts to economically develop its acreage in, produce reserves and achieve anticipated production levels from, and maximize reserve recovery from, its existing and future crude oil and natural gas exploration and development projects;
the extent to which EOG is successful in its efforts to market its crude oil and condensate, natural gas liquids, natural gas and related commodity production;
the availability, proximity and capacity of, and costs associated with, appropriate gathering, processing, compression, storage, transportation and refining facilities;
the availability, cost, terms and timing of issuance or execution of, and competition for, mineral licenses and leases and governmental and other permits and rights-of-way, and EOG’s ability to retain mineral licenses and leases;
the impact of, and changes in, government policies, laws and regulations, including tax laws and regulations; climate change and other environmental, health and safety laws and regulations relating to air emissions, disposal of produced water, drilling fluids and other wastes, hydraulic fracturing and access to and use of water; laws and regulations imposing conditions or restrictions on drilling and completion operations and on the transportation of crude oil and natural gas; laws and regulations with respect to derivatives and hedging activities; and laws and regulations with respect to the import and export of crude oil, natural gas and related commodities;
EOG's ability to effectively integrate acquired crude oil and natural gas properties into its operations, fully identify existing and potential problems with respect to such properties and accurately estimate reserves, production and costs with respect to such properties;
the extent to which EOG's third-party-operated crude oil and natural gas properties are operated successfully and economically;
competition in the oil and gas exploration and production industry for the acquisition of licenses, leases and properties, employees and other personnel, facilities, equipment, materials and services;
the availability and cost of employees and other personnel, facilities, equipment, materials (such as water)water and tubulars) and services;
the accuracy of reserve estimates, which by their nature involve the exercise of professional judgment and may therefore be imprecise;
weather, including its impact on crude oil and natural gas demand, and weather-related delays in drilling and in the installation and operation (by EOG or third parties) of production, gathering, processing, refining, compression, storage and transportation facilities;
the ability of EOG's customers and other contractual counterparties to satisfy their obligations to EOG and, related thereto, to access the credit and capital markets to obtain financing needed to satisfy their obligations to EOG;
EOG's ability to access the commercial paper market and other credit and capital markets to obtain financing on terms it deems acceptable, if at all, and to otherwise satisfy its capital expenditure requirements;
the extent to which EOG is successful in its completion of planned asset dispositions;
the extent and effect of any hedging activities engaged in by EOG;


the timing and extent of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rates, global and domestic financial market conditions and global and domestic general economic conditions;


geopolitical factors and political conditions and developments around the world (such as the imposition of tariffs or trade or other economic sanctions, political instability and armed conflict), including in the areas in which EOG operates;
the use of competing energy sources and the development of alternative energy sources;
the extent to which EOG incurs uninsured losses and liabilities or losses and liabilities in excess of its insurance coverage;
acts of war and terrorism and responses to these acts;
physical, electronic and cyber securitycybersecurity breaches; and
the other factors described under ITEM 1A, Risk Factors, on pages 13 through 22 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and any updates to those factors set forth in EOG's subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events anticipated by EOG's forward-looking statements may not occur, and, if any of such events do, we may not have anticipated the timing of their occurrence or the duration andor extent of their impact on our actual results. Accordingly, you should not place any undue reliance on any of EOG's forward-looking statements. EOG's forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and EOG undertakes no obligation, other than as required by applicable law, to update or revise its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, subsequent events, anticipated or unanticipated circumstances or otherwise.


ITEM 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from Item 7 of this report, specifically the information set forth under the captions "Derivative Transactions," "Financing," "Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk" and "Outlook" in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Capital Resources and Liquidity."

ITEM 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The information required by this Item is included in this report as set forth in the "Index to Financial Statements" on page F-1 and is incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

ITEM 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. EOG's management, with the participation of EOG's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of EOG's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)) as of December 31, 2016.2018. EOG's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information that is required to be disclosed in the reports EOG files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to EOG's management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on that evaluation, EOG's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that EOG's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.2018.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. EOG's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act). Even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, circumvention of controls or overriding of controls and, therefore, can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to reliable financial reporting. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a system of internal control over financial reporting in future periods can change as conditions change.



EOG's management assessed the effectiveness of EOG's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2018. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment and such criteria, EOG's management believes that EOG's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2018. See also "Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting" appearing on page F-2 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.



The report of EOG's independent registered public accounting firm relating to the consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page F-3 of this report.

On October 4, 2016, EOG completed its merger with Yates Petroleum Corporation, Abo Petroleum Corporation and MYCO Industries, Inc. (collectively, Yates). EOG's management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Yates. Yates financial statements constitute 0.04% and 14% of net and total assets, respectively, and 1% of revenue of the consolidated financial statements amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. With the exception of Yates, thereThere were no changes in EOG's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, EOG's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.  Other Information

None.
PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from (i) EOG's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than April 30, 20172019 and (ii) Item 1 of this report, specifically the information therein set forth under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant."

Pursuant to Rule 303A.10 of the New York Stock Exchange and Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, EOG has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees (Code of Conduct) that applies to all EOG directors, officers and employees, including EOG's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. EOG has also adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (Code of Ethics) that, along with EOG's Code of Conduct, applies to EOG's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controllers.

You can access the Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics on the "Corporate Governance""Governance" page under "About EOG""Investors" on EOG's website at www.eogresources.com, and any EOG stockholder who so requests may obtain a printed copy of the Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics by submitting a written request to EOG's Corporate Secretary.

EOG intends to disclose any amendments to the Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics, and any waivers with respect to the Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics granted to EOG's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, any of our controllers or any of our other employees performing similar functions, on its website at www.eogresources.com within four business days of the amendment or waiver. In such case, the disclosure regarding the amendment or waiver will remain available on EOG's website for at least 12 months after the initial disclosure. There have been no waivers granted with respect to EOG's Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics.

ITEM 11.  Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from EOG's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than April 30, 2017.2019. The Compensation Committee Report and related information incorporated by reference herein shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that EOG specifically incorporates such information by reference into such a filing.



ITEM 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from EOG's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than April 30, 2017.2019.

OnIn February 24, 2014, EOG's Board of Directors (Board) approved a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock dividend (payable to stockholders of record as of March 17, 2014, and paid on March 31, 2014) and corresponding adjustments to EOG's equity compensation plans. All share amounts set forth below have been restated to reflect the two-for-one stock split and such adjustments.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Stock Plans Approved by EOG Stockholders.  EOG's stockholders approved the EOG Resources, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (2008 Plan) at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2008.  At the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2010 (2010 Annual Meeting), an amendment to the 2008 Plan was approved, pursuant to which the number of shares of common stock available for future grants of stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units and other stock-based awards under the 2008 Plan was increased by an additional 13.8 million shares, to an aggregate maximum of 25.8 million shares plus shares underlying forfeited or canceled grants under the prior stock plans referenced in the 2008 Plan document.  At the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2013, EOG's stockholders approved the Amended and Restated EOG Resources, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated 2008 Plan).  As more fully discussed in the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan document, the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan, among other things, authorizes an additional 31.0 million shares of EOG common stock for grant under the plan and extends the expiration date of the plan to May 2023.  Under the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan, grants may be made to employees and non-employee members of EOG's Board.

AtAlso at the 2010 Annual Meeting, an amendment to the EOG Resources, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) was approved to increase the shares available for grant by 2.0 million shares.  The ESPP was originally approved by EOG's stockholders in 2001, and would have expired on July 1, 2011.  The amendment also extended the term of the ESPP to December 31, 2019, unless terminated earlier by its terms or by EOG.

The 1993 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan has also been At the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders approved by EOG's stockholders.  Upon the effective datean amendment and restatement of the 2008 Plan, noESPP to (among other changes) increase the number of shares available for grant by 2.5 million shares and further grants were made underextend the 1993 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan.  Plans that have not been approvedterm of the ESPP to December 31, 2027, unless terminated earlier by EOG's stockholders are described below.its terms or by EOG.

Stock Plans Not Approved by EOG Stockholders.  In December 2008, the Board approved the amendment and continuation of the 1996 Deferral Plan as the "EOG Resources, Inc. 409A Deferred Compensation Plan" (Deferral Plan).  Under the Deferral Plan (as subsequently amended), payment of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of annual cash bonus, director's fees, vestings of restricted stock units granted to non-employee directors (and dividends credited thereon) under the 2008 Plan and 401(k) refunds (as defined in the Deferral Plan) may be deferred into a phantom stock account. In the phantom stock account, deferrals are treated as if shares of EOG common stock were purchased at the closing stock price on the date of deferral.  Dividends are credited quarterly and treated as if reinvested in EOG common stock.  Payment of the phantom stock account is made in actual shares of EOG common stock in accordance with the Deferral Plan and the individual's deferral election.  A total of 540,000 shares of EOG common stock have been authorized by the Board and registered for issuance under the Deferral Plan.  As of December 31, 2016, 296,2222018, 327,362 phantom shares had been issued. The Deferral Plan is currently EOG's only stock plan that has not been approved by EOG's stockholders.

   


   The following table sets forth data for EOG's equity compensation plans aggregated by the various plans approved by EOG's stockholders and those plans not approved by EOG's stockholders, in each case as of December 31, 2016.2018.
Plan Category
 
(a)
Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 
(b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 
(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
  
(a)
Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 
(b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (1)
 
(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
 
              
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by EOG Stockholders 9,850,096
(1) 
$75.53
 21,813,212
(2) 
 9,759,247
(2) 
$96.90
 16,243,789
(3) 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by EOG Stockholders 266,013
(3) 
N/A
 243,778
(4) 
 273,296
(4) 
N/A
 212,638
(5) 
Total 10,116,109
 $75.53
 22,056,990
  10,032,543
 $96.90
 16,456,427
 
 
(1)DoesThe weighted-average exercise price is calculated based solely on the exercise prices of the outstanding stock option and SAR grants and does not include 1,109,618reflect shares that will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock unitsunit and 545,290performance unit grants, or Deferral Plan phantom shares, all of which have no exercise price.
(2)Amount includes 910,880 outstanding performancerestricted stock units, for which shares of EOG common stock will be issued, on a one-for-one basis, upon the vesting of such grants. Amount also includes 539,029 outstanding performance units and assumes, for purposes of this table, (i) the application of a 100% performance multiple upon the completion of each of the remaining performance periods in respect of such performance unit grants and (ii) accordingly, the issuance, on a one-for-one basis, of an aggregate 539,029 shares of EOG common stock upon the vesting of such grants. As more fully discussed in Note 7 to Consolidated Financial Statements, upon the application of the relevant performance multiple at the completion of each of the remaining performance periods in respect of such grants, (A) a minimum of 143,610 and a maximum of 934,448 performance units could be outstanding and (B) accordingly, a minimum of 143,610 and a maximum of 934,448 shares of EOG common stock could be issued upon the vesting of such grants.
(2)(3)Consists of (i) 21,457,05913,748,078 shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan and (ii) 356,1532,495,711 shares remaining available for purchase under the ESPP.  Pursuant to the fungible share design of the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan, each share issued as a SAR or stock option under the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan counts as 1.0 share against the aggregate plan share limit, and each share issued as a "full value award" (i.e., as restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock or performance units) counts as 2.45 shares against the aggregate plan share limit.  Thus, from the 21,457,05913,748,078 shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan, (i) the maximum number of shares we could issue as SAR and stock option awards is 21,457,05913,748,078 (i.e., if all shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan are issued as SAR and stock option awards) and (ii) the maximum number of shares we could issue as full value awards is 8,757,9835,611,460 (i.e., if all shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan are issued as full value awards).
(3)(4)Consists of shares of EOG common stock to be issued in accordance with the Deferral Plan and participant deferral elections (i.e., in respect of the 266,013273,296 phantom shares issued and outstanding under the Deferral Plan as of December 31, 2016)2018).
(4)(5)Represents phantom shares that remain available for issuance under the Deferral Plan.

ITEM 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from EOG's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than April 30, 2017.2019.

ITEM 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from EOG's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than April 30, 2017.2019.



PART IV

ITEM 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) and (a)(2) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

See "Index to Financial Statements" set forth on page F-1.

(a)(3), (b)      Exhibits

See pages E-1 through E-6 for a listing of the exhibits.

ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.



EOG RESOURCES, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 Page
  
Consolidated Financial Statements: 
  
Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20162018
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 20162018 and 20152017
  
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20162018
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20162018
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
  
Supplemental Information to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-35


MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The following consolidated financial statements of EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, EOG), were prepared by management, which is responsible for the integrity, objectivity and fair presentation of such financial statements.  The statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and, accordingly, include some amounts that are based on the best estimates and judgments of management.

EOG's management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as well as designing and implementing programs and controls to prevent and detect fraud.  The system of internal control of EOG is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.  This system consists of 1) entity level controls, including written policies and guidelines relating to the ethical conduct of business affairs, 2) general computer controls and 3) process controls over initiating, authorizing, recording, processing and reporting transactions.  Even an effective internal control system, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, circumvention of controls or overriding of controls and, therefore, can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to reliable financial reporting.  Furthermore, the effectiveness of a system of internal control over financial reporting in future periods can change as conditions change.

The adequacy of EOG's financial controls and the accounting principles employed by EOG in its financial reporting are under the general oversight of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.  No member of this committee is an officer or employee of EOG.  Moreover, EOG's independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors have full, free, separate and direct access to the Audit Committee and meet with the committee periodically to discuss accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters.

EOG's management assessed the effectiveness of EOG's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.  On October 4, 2016, EOG completed its merger with Yates Petroleum Corporation, Abo Petroleum Corporation and MYCO Industries, Inc. (collectively, Yates). EOG's management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Yates. Yates financial statements constitute 0.04% and 14% of net and total assets, respectively, and 1% of revenue of the consolidated financial statements amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. With the exception of Yates, there were no changes in EOG's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, EOG's internal control over financial reporting.2018.  In making this assessment, EOG used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013).  These criteria cover the control environment, risk assessment process, control activities, information and communication systems, and monitoring activities.  Based on this assessment and those criteria, management believes that EOG maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2018.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, was engaged to audit the consolidated financial statements of EOG and audit EOG's internal control over financial reporting and issue a report thereon.  In the conduct of the audits, Deloitte & Touche LLP was given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data, including all minutes of meetings of stockholders, the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors.  Management believes that all representations made to Deloitte & Touche LLP during the audits were valid and appropriate.  Their audits were made in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Their report appears on page F-3.

WILLIAM R. THOMAS TIMOTHY K. DRIGGERS
Chairman of the Board and Executive Vice President and Chief
Chief Executive Officer Financial Officer
   
Houston, Texas  
February 27, 201726, 2019  



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
EOG Resources, Inc.
Houston, Texas


Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EOG Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016.2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
As described We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessmentaccordance with the internal control over financial reporting at Yates Petroleum Corporation, Abo Petroleum CorporationU.S. federal securities laws and MYCO Industries, Inc., (collectively "Yates"), which was acquired on October 4, 2016. Yates financial statements constitute 0.04%the applicable rules and 14% of net and total assets, respectively, and 1% of revenueregulations of the consolidated financial statements amounts as ofSecurities and forExchange Commission and the year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Yates.PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements.
Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation. statements.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EOG Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
February 27, 201726, 2019

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.



EOG RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)


Year Ended December 312016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Net Operating Revenues     
Operating Revenues and Other     
Crude Oil and Condensate$4,317,341
 $4,934,562
 $9,742,480
$9,517,440
 $6,256,396
 $4,317,341
Natural Gas Liquids437,250
 407,658
 934,051
1,127,510
 729,561
 437,250
Natural Gas742,152
 1,061,038
 1,916,386
1,301,537
 921,934
 742,152
Gains (Losses) on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts(99,608) 61,924
 834,273
(165,640) 19,828
 (99,608)
Gathering, Processing and Marketing1,966,259
 2,253,135
 4,046,316
5,230,355
 3,298,087
 1,966,259
Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions, Net205,835
 (8,798) 507,590
174,562
 (99,096) 205,835
Other, Net81,403
 47,909
 54,244
89,635
 81,610
 81,403
Total7,650,632
 8,757,428
 18,035,340
17,275,399
 11,208,320
 7,650,632
Operating Expenses 
  
  
 
  
  
Lease and Well927,452
 1,182,282
 1,416,413
1,282,678
 1,044,847
 927,452
Transportation Costs764,106
 849,319
 972,176
746,876
 740,352
 764,106
Gathering and Processing Costs122,901
 146,156
 145,800
436,973
 148,775
 122,901
Exploration Costs124,953
 149,494
 184,388
148,999
 145,342
 124,953
Dry Hole Costs10,657
 14,746
 48,490
5,405
 4,609
 10,657
Impairments620,267
 6,613,546
 743,575
347,021
 479,240
 620,267
Marketing Costs2,007,635
 2,385,982
 4,126,060
5,203,243
 3,330,237
 2,007,635
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,553,417
 3,313,644
 3,997,041
3,435,408
 3,409,387
 3,553,417
General and Administrative394,815
 366,594
 402,010
426,969
 434,467
 394,815
Taxes Other Than Income349,710
 421,744
 757,564
772,481
 544,662
 349,710
Total8,875,913
 15,443,507
 12,793,517
12,806,053
 10,281,918
 8,875,913
Operating Income (Loss)(1,225,281) (6,686,079) 5,241,823
4,469,346
 926,402
 (1,225,281)
Other (Expense) Income, Net(50,543) 1,916
 (45,050)
Other Income (Expense), Net16,704
 9,152
 (50,543)
Income (Loss) Before Interest Expense and Income Taxes(1,275,824) (6,684,163) 5,196,773
4,486,050
 935,554
 (1,275,824)
Interest Expense 
  
  
 
  
  
Incurred313,341
 279,234
 258,628
269,549
 301,801
 313,341
Capitalized(31,660) (41,841) (57,170)(24,497) (27,429) (31,660)
Net Interest Expense281,681
 237,393
 201,458
245,052
 274,372
 281,681
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes(1,557,505) (6,921,556) 4,995,315
4,240,998
 661,182
 (1,557,505)
Income Tax (Benefit) Provision(460,819) (2,397,041) 2,079,828
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)821,958
 (1,921,397) (460,819)
Net Income (Loss)$(1,096,686) $(4,524,515) $2,915,487
$3,419,040
 $2,582,579
 $(1,096,686)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share 
  
  
 
  
  
Basic$(1.98) $(8.29) $5.36
$5.93
 $4.49
 $(1.98)
Diluted$(1.98) $(8.29) $5.32
$5.89
 $4.46
 $(1.98)
Dividends Declared per Common Share$0.670
 $0.670
 $0.585
Average Number of Common Shares 
  
  
 
  
  
Basic553,384
 545,697
 543,443
576,578
 574,620
 553,384
Diluted553,384
 545,697
 548,539
580,441
 578,693
 553,384
Comprehensive Income (Loss) 
  
  
 
  
  
Net Income (Loss)$(1,096,686) $(4,524,515) $2,915,487
$3,419,040
 $2,582,579
 $(1,096,686)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 
  
  
 
  
  
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments12,097
 (11,517) (437,728)16,816
 2,799
 12,097
Other, Net of Tax2,231
 1,235
 (1,162)1,123
 (3,086) 2,231
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)14,328
 (10,282) (438,890)17,939
 (287) 14,328
Comprehensive Income (Loss)$(1,082,358) $(4,534,797) $2,476,597
$3,436,979
 $2,582,292
 $(1,082,358)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


EOG RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
At December 312016 20152018 2017
ASSETS
Current Assets      
Cash and Cash Equivalents$1,599,895
 $718,506
$1,555,634
 $834,228
Accounts Receivable, Net1,216,320
 930,610
1,915,215
 1,597,494
Inventories350,017
 598,935
859,359
 483,865
Assets from Price Risk Management Activities23,806
 7,699
Income Taxes Receivable12,305
 40,704
427,909
 113,357
Deferred Income Taxes169,387
 147,812
Other206,679
 155,677
275,467
 242,465
Total3,554,603
 2,592,244
5,057,390
 3,279,108
Property, Plant and Equipment 
  
 
  
Oil and Gas Properties (Successful Efforts Method)49,592,091
 50,613,241
57,330,016
 52,555,741
Other Property, Plant and Equipment4,008,564
 3,986,610
4,220,665
 3,960,759
Total Property, Plant and Equipment53,600,655
 54,599,851
61,550,681
 56,516,500
Less: Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(27,893,577) (30,389,130)(33,475,162) (30,851,463)
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net25,707,078
 24,210,721
28,075,519
 25,665,037
Deferred Income Taxes777
 17,506
Other Assets197,752
 167,505
800,788
 871,427
Total Assets$29,459,433
 $26,970,470
$33,934,474
 $29,833,078
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities 
  
 
  
Accounts Payable$1,511,826
 $1,471,953
$2,239,850
 $1,847,131
Accrued Taxes Payable118,411
 93,618
214,726
 148,874
Dividends Payable96,120
 91,546
126,971
 96,410
Liabilities from Price Risk Management Activities61,817
 

 50,429
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt6,579
 6,579
913,093
 356,235
Other232,538
 155,591
233,724
 226,463
Total2,027,291
 1,819,287
3,728,364
 2,725,542
Long-Term Debt6,979,779
 6,648,911
5,170,169
 6,030,836
Other Liabilities1,282,142
 971,335
1,258,355
 1,275,213
Deferred Income Taxes5,188,640
 4,587,902
4,413,398
 3,518,214
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)

 



 

Stockholders' Equity 
  
 
  
Common Stock, $0.01 Par, 640,000,000 Shares Authorized and 576,950,272 Shares and 550,150,823 Shares Issued at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively205,770
 205,502
Common Stock, $0.01 Par, 1,280,000,000 Shares Authorized and 580,408,117 Shares and 578,827,768 Shares Issued at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively205,804
 205,788
Additional Paid in Capital5,420,385
 2,923,461
5,658,794
 5,536,547
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(19,010) (33,338)(1,358) (19,297)
Retained Earnings8,398,118
 9,870,816
13,543,130
 10,593,533
Common Stock Held in Treasury, 250,155 Shares and 292,179 Shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively(23,682) (23,406)
Common Stock Held in Treasury, 385,042 Shares and 350,961 Shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively(42,182) (33,298)
Total Stockholders' Equity13,981,581
 12,943,035
19,364,188
 16,283,273
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$29,459,433
 $26,970,470
$33,934,474
 $29,833,078

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


EOG RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Common
Stock
Held In
Treasury
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Common
Stock
Held In
Treasury
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013$202,732
 $2,646,879
 $415,834
 $12,168,277
 $(15,263) $15,418,459
Net Income
 
 
 2,915,487
 
 2,915,487
Common Stock Issued Under Stock Plans8
 22,252
 
 
 
 22,260
Common Stock Dividends Declared, $0.59 Per Share
 
 
 (320,666) 
 (320,666)
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 (438,890) 
 
 (438,890)
Change in Treasury Stock - Stock Compensation Plans, Net
 (30,470) 
 
 (96,962) (127,432)
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation
 99,459
 
 
 
 99,459
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, Net18
 (43,109) 
 
 43,091
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses
 144,842
 
 
 
 144,842
Common Stock Issued - Stock Split2,734
 (2,734) 
 
 
 
Treasury Stock Issued as Compensation
 31
 
 
 (968) (937)
Balance at December 31, 2014205,492
 2,837,150
 (23,056) 14,763,098
 (70,102) 17,712,582
Net Loss
 
 
 (4,524,515) 
 (4,524,515)
Common Stock Issued Under Stock Plans5
 15,366
 
 
 
 15,371
Common Stock Dividends Declared, $0.67 Per Share
 
 
 (367,767) 
 (367,767)
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 (10,282) 
 
 (10,282)
Change in Treasury Stock - Stock Compensation Plans, Net
 (41,342) 
 
 (129) (41,471)
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation
 26,058
 
 
 
 26,058
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, Net5
 (44,339) 
 
 44,334
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses
 130,577
 
 
 
 130,577
Treasury Stock Issued as Compensation
 (9) 
 
 2,491
 2,482
Balance at December 31, 2015205,502
 2,923,461
 (33,338) 9,870,816
 (23,406) 12,943,035
$205,502
 $2,923,461
 $(33,338) $9,870,816
 $(23,406) $12,943,035
Net Loss
 
 
 (1,096,686) 
 (1,096,686)
 
 
 (1,096,686) 
 (1,096,686)
Common Stock Issued for the Yates Transaction252
 2,397,635
 
 
 
 2,397,887
252
 2,397,635
 
 
 
 2,397,887
Common Stock Issued Under Stock Plans9
 16,388
 
 
 
 16,397
9
 16,388
 
 
 
 16,397
Common Stock Dividends Declared, $0.67 Per Share
 
 
 (376,012) 
 (376,012)
 
 
 (376,012) 
 (376,012)
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 14,328
 
 
 14,328
Other Comprehensive Income
 
 14,328
 
 
 14,328
Change in Treasury Stock - Stock Compensation Plans, Net
 (27,018) 
 
 (48,208) (75,226)
 (27,018) 
 
 (48,208) (75,226)
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation
 29,357
 
 
 
 29,357

 29,357
 
 
 
 29,357
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, Net7
 (47,509) 
 
 47,502
 
7
 (47,509) 
 
 47,502
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses
 128,090
 
 
 
 128,090

 128,090
 
 
 
 128,090
Treasury Stock Issued as Compensation
 (19) 
 
 430
 411

 (19) 
 
 430
 411
Balance at December 31, 2016$205,770
 $5,420,385
 $(19,010) $8,398,118
 $(23,682) $13,981,581
205,770
 5,420,385
 (19,010) 8,398,118
 (23,682) 13,981,581
Net Income
 
 
 2,582,579
 
 2,582,579
Common Stock Issued Under Stock Plans7
 7,082
 
 
 
 7,089
Common Stock Dividends Declared, $0.67 Per Share
 
 
 (387,164) 
 (387,164)
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 (287) 
 
 (287)
Change in Treasury Stock - Stock Compensation Plans, Net
 (27,348) 
 
 (9,395) (36,743)
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, Net11
 2,552
 
 
 (2,563) 
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses
 133,849
 
 
 
 133,849
Treasury Stock Issued as Compensation
 27
 
 
 2,342
 2,369
Balance at December 31, 2017205,788
 5,536,547
 (19,297) 10,593,533
 (33,298) 16,283,273
Net Income
 
 
 3,419,040
 
 3,419,040
Common Stock Issued Under Stock Plans8
 5,612
 
 
 
 5,620
Common Stock Dividends Declared, $0.81 Per Share
 
 
 (469,443) 
 (469,443)
Other Comprehensive Income
 
 17,939
 
 
 17,939
Change in Treasury Stock - Stock Compensation Plans, Net
 (35,118) 
 
 (13,336) (48,454)
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, Net8
 (3,891) 
 
 3,883
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses
 155,337
 
 
 
 155,337
Treasury Stock Issued as Compensation
 307
 
 
 569
 876
Balance at December 31, 2018$205,804
 $5,658,794
 $(1,358) $13,543,130
 $(42,182) $19,364,188

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


EOG RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 312016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities          
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:          
Net Income (Loss)$(1,096,686) $(4,524,515) $2,915,487
$3,419,040
 $2,582,579
 $(1,096,686)
Items Not Requiring (Providing) Cash 
  
  
 
  
  
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,553,417
 3,313,644
 3,997,041
3,435,408
 3,409,387
 3,553,417
Impairments620,267
 6,613,546
 743,575
347,021
 479,240
 620,267
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses128,090
 130,577
 145,086
155,337
 133,849
 128,090
Deferred Income Taxes(515,206) (2,482,307) 1,704,946
894,156
 (1,473,872) (515,206)
(Gains) Losses on Asset Dispositions, Net(205,835) 8,798
 (507,590)(174,562) 99,096
 (205,835)
Other, Net61,690
 11,896
 48,138
7,066
 6,546
 61,690
Dry Hole Costs10,657
 14,746
 48,490
5,405
 4,609
 10,657
Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts 
  
  
 
  
  
Total Losses (Gains)99,608
 (61,924) (834,273)
Net Cash (Payments) Received from Settlements of Commodity Derivative Contracts(22,219) 730,114
 34,007
Total (Gains) Losses165,640
 (19,828) 99,608
Net Cash Received from (Payments for) Settlements of Commodity Derivative Contracts(258,906) 7,438
 (22,219)
Excess Tax Benefits from Stock-Based Compensation(29,357) (26,058) (99,459)
 
 (29,357)
Other, Net10,971
 12,532
 13,009
3,108
 1,204
 10,971
Changes in Components of Working Capital and Other Assets and Liabilities 
  
  
 
  
  
Accounts Receivable(232,799) 641,412
 84,982
(368,180) (392,131) (232,799)
Inventories170,694
 58,450
 (161,958)(395,408) (174,548) 170,694
Accounts Payable(74,048) (1,409,197) 543,630
439,347
 324,192
 (74,048)
Accrued Taxes Payable92,782
 11,798
 16,486
(92,461) (63,937) 92,782
Other Assets(40,636) 118,143
 (14,448)(125,435) (658,609) (40,636)
Other Liabilities(16,225) (66,257) 75,420
10,949
 (89,871) (16,225)
Changes in Components of Working Capital Associated with Investing and Financing Activities(156,102) 499,767
 (103,414)301,083
 89,992
 (156,102)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities2,359,063
 3,595,165
 8,649,155
7,768,608
 4,265,336
 2,359,063
Investing Cash Flows 
  
  
 
  
  
Additions to Oil and Gas Properties(2,489,756) (4,725,150) (7,519,667)(5,839,294) (3,950,918) (2,489,756)
Additions to Other Property, Plant and Equipment(93,039) (288,013) (727,138)(237,181) (173,324) (93,039)
Proceeds from Sales of Assets1,119,215
 192,807
 569,332
227,446
 226,768
 1,119,215
Changes in Restricted Cash
 
 60,385
Net Cash Received from Yates Transaction54,534
 
 

 
 54,534
Other Investing Activities(19,993) 
 
Changes in Components of Working Capital Associated with Investing Activities156,102
 (499,900) 103,523
(301,140) (89,935) 156,102
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(1,252,944) (5,320,256) (7,513,565)(6,170,162) (3,987,409) (1,252,944)
Financing Cash Flows 
  
  
 
  
  
Net Commercial Paper Borrowings(259,718) 259,718
 
Net Commercial Paper Repayments
 
 (259,718)
Long-Term Debt Borrowings991,097
 990,225
 496,220

 
 991,097
Long-Term Debt Repayments(563,829) (500,000) (500,000)(350,000) (600,000) (563,829)
Settlement of Foreign Currency Swap
 
 (31,573)
Dividends Paid(372,845) (367,005) (279,695)(438,045) (386,531) (372,845)
Excess Tax Benefits from Stock-Based Compensation29,357
 26,058
 99,459

 
 29,357
Treasury Stock Purchased(82,125) (48,791) (127,424)(63,456) (63,408) (82,125)
Proceeds from Stock Options Exercised and Employee Stock Purchase Plan23,296
 22,690
 22,249
20,560
 20,840
 23,296
Debt Issuance Costs(1,602) (5,951) (895)
 
 (1,602)
Repayment of Capital Lease Obligation(6,353) (6,156) (5,966)(8,219) (6,555) (6,353)
Other, Net
 133
 (109)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(242,722) 370,921
 (327,734)
Changes in Components of Working Capital Associated with Financing Activities57
 (57) 
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities(839,103) (1,035,711) (242,722)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash17,992
 (14,537) (38,852)(37,937) (7,883) 17,992
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents881,389
 (1,368,707) 769,004
721,406
 (765,667) 881,389
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year718,506
 2,087,213
 1,318,209
834,228
 1,599,895
 718,506
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$1,599,895
 $718,506
 $2,087,213
$1,555,634
 $834,228
 $1,599,895

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


EOG RESOURCES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) include the accounts of all domestic and foreign subsidiaries.  Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, in which EOG is able to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Financial Instruments.  EOG's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, commodity derivative contracts, accounts receivable, accounts payable and current and long-term debt.  The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, commodity derivative contracts, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value (see Notes 2 and 12).

Cash and Cash Equivalents. EOG records as cash equivalents all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Oil and Gas Operations. EOG accounts for its crude oil and natural gas exploration and production activities under the successful efforts method of accounting.

Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are capitalized when incurred. Unproved properties with acquisition costs that are not individually significant are aggregated, and the portion of such costs estimated to be nonproductive is amortized over the remaining lease term.  Unproved properties with individually significant acquisition costs are reviewed individually for impairment. If the unproved properties are determined to be productive, the appropriate related costs are transferred to proved oil and gas properties.  Lease rentals are expensed as incurred.

Oil and gas exploration costs, other than the costs of drilling exploratory wells, are expensed as incurred.  The costs of drilling exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether EOG has discovered commercial quantities of proved commercial reserves.  If commercial quantities of proved commercial reserves are not discovered, such drilling costs are expensed.  In some circumstances, it may be uncertain whether commercial quantities of proved commercial reserves have been discovered when drilling has been completed.  Such exploratory well drilling costs may continue to be capitalized if the reserve quantity is sufficient to justify its completion as a producing well and sufficient progress in assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project is being made (see Note 16).  Costs to develop proved reserves, including the costs of all development wells and related equipment used in the production of crude oil and natural gas, are capitalized.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of the cost of proved oil and gas properties is calculated using the unit-of-production method.  The reserve base used to calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization for leasehold acquisition costs and the cost to acquire proved properties is the sum of proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves.  With respect to lease and well equipment costs, which include development costs and successful exploration drilling costs, the reserve base includes only proved developed reserves.  Estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are taken into account.

Oil and gas properties are grouped in accordance with the provisions of the Extractive Industries - Oil and Gas Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).  The basis for grouping is a reasonable aggregation of properties with a common geological structural feature or stratigraphic condition, such as a reservoir or field.

Amortization rates are updated quarterly to reflect: 1) the addition of capital costs, 2) reserve revisions (upwards or downwards) and additions, 3) property acquisitions and/or property dispositions and 4) impairments.



When circumstances indicate that proved oil and gas properties may be impaired, EOG compares expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation, depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset.  If the expected undiscounted future cash flows, based on EOG's estimate of (and assumptions regarding) future crude oil and natural gas prices, operating costs, development expenditures, anticipated production from proved reserves and other relevant data, are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, the capitalized cost is reduced to fair value.  Fair value is generally calculated using the Income Approach described in the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the ASC.  If applicable,In certain instances, EOG utilizes accepted bidsoffers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value.

Inventories, consisting primarily of tubular goods, materials for completion operations and well equipment held for use in the exploration for, and development and production of, crude oil and natural gas reserves, are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value with adjustments made, as appropriate, to recognize any reductions in value.

ArrangementsRevenue Recognition. Effective January 1, 2018, EOG adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers" (ASU 2014-09). ASU 2014-09 and other related ASUs require entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for salesthose goods or services. EOG elected to adopt ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective approach, which required EOG to recognize in retained earnings the cumulative effect at the date of adoption for all existing contracts with customers which were not substantially complete as of January 1, 2018. There was no impact to retained earnings upon adoption of ASU 2014-09.

EOG presents disaggregated revenues by type of commodity within its Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and by geographic areas defined as operating segments. See Note 11.

In connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, EOG presents natural gas processing fees relating to certain processing and marketing agreements within its United States segment as Gathering and Processing Costs, instead of as a deduction to Revenues within its Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss). There was no impact to operating income, net income or cash flows resulting from changes to the presentation of natural gas processing fees. The impacts of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 for the year ended December 31, 2018, were as follows (in thousands):

 As Reported Amounts Without Adoption of ASU 2014-09 Effect of Change
      
Operating Revenues and Other     
Crude Oil and Condensate$9,517,440
 $9,517,440
 $
Natural Gas Liquids1,127,510
 1,121,237
 6,273
Natural Gas1,301,537
 1,104,095
 197,442
Gathering, Processing and Marketing5,230,355
 5,211,136
 19,219
Total Operating Revenues and Other17,275,399
 17,052,465
 222,934
Operating Expenses     
Gathering and Processing Costs436,973
 233,258
 203,715
Marketing Costs5,203,243
 5,184,024
 19,219
Total Operating Expenses12,806,053
 12,583,119
 222,934
Operating Income4,469,346
 4,469,346
 

Revenues are recognized for the sale of crude oil and condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and natural gas at the point control of the product is transferred to the customer, typically when production is delivered and title or risk of loss transfers to the customer. Arrangements for such sales are evidenced by signed contracts with determinableprices typically based on stated market prices,indices, with certain adjustments for product quality and revenuesgeographic location. As EOG typically invoices customers shortly after performance obligations have been fulfilled, contract assets and contract liabilities are recordednot recognized. The balances of accounts receivable from contracts with customers on January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018, were $1,343 million and $1,460 million, respectively, and are included in Accounts Receivable, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Losses incurred on receivables from contracts with customers are infrequent and have been immaterial.



Crude Oil and Condensate. EOG sells its crude oil and condensate production at the wellhead or further downstream at a contractually-specified delivery point. Revenue is recognized when control transfers to the customer based on contract terms which reflect prevailing market prices. Any costs incurred prior to the transfer of control, such as gathering and transportation, are recognized as Operating Expenses.

Natural Gas Liquids. EOG delivers certain of its natural gas production to either EOG-owned processing facilities or third-party processing facilities, where extraction of NGLs occurs. For EOG-owned facilities, revenue is delivered.  A significant majorityrecognized after processing upon transfer of these productsNGLs to a customer. For third-party facilities, extracted NGLs are sold to purchasers who have investment-grade credit ratingsthe owner of the processing facility at the tailgate, or EOG takes possession and material credit losses have been rare.  Revenues are recorded onsells the entitlement methodextracted NGLs at the tailgate or exercises its option to sell further downstream to various customers. Under typical arrangements for third-party facilities, revenue is recognized after processing upon the transfer of control of the NGLs, either at the tailgate of the processing plant or further downstream. EOG recognizes revenues based on EOG's percentage ownershipcontract terms which reflect prevailing market prices, with processing fees recognized as Gathering and Processing Costs.

Natural Gas. EOG sells its natural gas production either at the wellhead or further downstream at a contractually-specified delivery point. In connection with the extraction of current production.  Each working interest owner in a well generally hasNGLs, EOG sells residue gas under separate agreements. Typically, EOG takes possession of the rightnatural gas at the tailgate of the processing facility and sells it at the tailgate or further downstream. In each case, EOG recognizes revenues when control transfers to a specific percentage of production, although actual production soldthe customer, based on that owner's behalf may differ from that owner's ownership percentage.  Under entitlement accounting, a receivable is recorded when underproduction occurscontract terms which reflect prevailing market prices.

Gathering, Processing and a payable is recorded when overproduction occurs.Marketing. Gathering, processing and marketing revenues represent sales of third-party crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas, as well as gathering fees associated with gathering and processing third-party natural gas and revenues from sales of EOG-owned sand. EOG evaluates whether it is the principal or agent under these transactions. As control of the underlying commodity is transferred to EOG prior to the gathering, processing and marketing activities, EOG considers itself the principal of these arrangements. Accordingly, EOG recognizes these transactions on a gross basis. Purchases of third-party commodities are recorded as Marketing Costs, with sales of third-party commodities and fees received for gathering and processing recorded as Gathering, Processing and Marketing revenues.

Other Property, Plant and Equipment.  Other property, plant and equipment consists of gathering and processing assets, compressors, buildings and leasehold improvements, crude-by-rail assets, sand mine and sand processing assets, computer hardware and software, vehicles, and furniture and fixtures.  Other property, plant and equipment is generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the property, plant and equipment, which range from 3 years to 45 years.

Capitalized Interest Costs.  Interest costs have been capitalized as a part of the historical cost of unproved oil and gas properties.  The amount capitalized is an allocation of the interest cost incurred during the reporting period.  Capitalized interest is computed only during the exploration and development phases and ceases once production begins.  The interest rate used for capitalization purposes is based on the interest rates on EOG's outstanding borrowings. The capitalization of interest is excluded on significant acquisitions of unproved oil and gas properties financed through non-interest-bearing instruments, such as the issuance of shares of Common Stock, or through non-cash property exchanges.

Accounting for Risk Management Activities.  Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value, and changes in the derivative's fair value are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.  During the three-year period ended December 31, 2016,2018, EOG elected not to designate any of its financial commodity derivative instruments as accounting hedges and, accordingly, changes in the fair value of these outstanding derivative instruments are recognized as gains or losses in the period of change.  The gains or losses are recorded as Gains (Losses) on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income.Income (Loss).  The related cash flow impact of settled contracts is reflected as cash flows from operating activities.  EOG was party to a foreign currency swap transaction and an interest rate swap transaction, both of which were accounted for using the hedge accounting method.  EOG employs net presentation of derivative assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes when such assets and liabilities are with the same counterparty and subject to a master netting arrangement.  See Note 12.

Income Taxes. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability approach.  Under this approach, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.  EOG assesses the realizability of deferred tax assets and recognizes valuation allowances as appropriate (seeappropriate.



In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118" (ASU 2018-05). In December 2017, the United States (U.S.) enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which made significant changes to U.S. federal income tax law. Shortly after enactment of the TCJA, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which provides guidance on accounting for the impact of the TCJA. ASU 2018-05 codified various paragraphs of SAB 118 and was effective upon issuance. Under ASU 2018-05, an entity will use a similar approach as the measurement period provided in the Business Combinations Topic of the ASC. An entity will recognize those matters for which the accounting can be completed. For matters that have not been completed, the entity will either (1) recognize provisional amounts to the extent that they are reasonably able to be estimated and adjust them over time as more information becomes available or (2) for any specific income tax effects of the TCJA for which a reasonable estimate cannot be determined, continue to apply the Income Taxes Topic of the ASC on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the TCJA was signed into law. EOG has prepared its Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 in accordance with ASU 2018-05. As discussed in EOG's 2017 Annual Report, provisional amounts were recorded for tax accruals as of December 31, 2017 for certain aspects of the TCJA. EOG has updated and finalized the 2017 U.S. federal and state provisional amounts. See Note 6).6.

Foreign Currency Translation. The United States dollar is the functional currency for all of EOG's consolidated subsidiaries except for its Canadian subsidiaries, for which the functional currency is the Canadian dollar, and its United Kingdom subsidiary (which was sold in the fourth quarter of 2018), for which the functional currency iswas the British pound.  For subsidiaries whose functional currency is deemed to be other than the United States dollar, asset and liability accounts are translated at year-end exchange rates and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year.  Translation adjustments are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Any gains or losses on transactions or monetary assets or liabilities in currencies other than the functional currency are included in net income in the current period. See Notes 4 and 17.



Net Income (Loss) Per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the assumed issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive securities (seesecurities. See Note 9).9.

Stock-Based Compensation. EOG measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (seeaward. See Note 7).7.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards. In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-01 "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business" (ASU 2017-01), which clarifies the definition of a business to provide guidance in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 provides a screen to determine when a set of assets is not a business, requiring that when substantially all fair value of gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set of assets is not a business. A framework is provided to assist in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present for the set to be a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. No disclosures are required at transition and early adoption is permitted. EOG is evaluating ASU 2017-01 to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (ASU 2016-15).  ASU 2016-15 reduces existing diversity in practice by providing guidance on the classification of eight specific cash receipts and cash payments transactions in the statement of cash flows.  The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted.  EOG does not intend to early adopt ASU 2016-15. EOG does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" (ASU 2016-09), which amends certain aspects of accounting for share-based payment arrangements. ASU 2016-09 revises or provides alternative accounting for the tax impacts of share-based payment arrangements, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax withholdings and prescribes certain disclosures to be made in the period the new standard is adopted. ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early application is permitted. EOG will adopt ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. There will be no impact to retained earnings with respect to excess tax benefits. EOG will begin recognizing all excess benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit as discrete events. The treatment of forfeitures will not change as EOG is electing to continue the current process of estimating the number of forfeitures. As such, this will have no cumulative effect on retained earnings. EOG will elect to present changes to the cash flow statement on a prospective transition method.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" (ASU 2016-02), which significantly changes accounting for leases by requiring that lessees recognize a right-of-use asset and a related lease liability representing the obligation to make lease payments, for virtually allcertain lease transactions. Additional disclosures about an entity's lease transactions will also be required. ASU 2016-02 defines a lease as "a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment (an identified asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration." In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, "Leases (Topic 842) - Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842" (ASU 2018-01), which permits an entity an optional election to not evaluate under ASU 2016-02 isthose existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. Additionally, in July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842) - Targeted Improvements” (ASU 2018-11), which permits an entity (i) to apply the provisions of ASU 2016-02 at the adoption date instead of the earliest period presented in the financial statements, and, as a lessor, (ii) to account for lease and nonlease components as a single component as the nonlease components would otherwise be accounted for under the provisions of ASU 2014-09. ASU 2016-02 and other related ASUs are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2018, and early application is permitted. LesseesBased on the provisions of ASU 2018-11 and other related ASUs, lessees and lessors are required tomay recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements, defined as the effective date, using a modified retrospective approach. approach, or at the adoption date by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.

EOG is reviewingcontinuing to progress towards the adoption of ASU 2016-02 by implementing its project plan, including a lease accounting software solution. EOG has assessed the scope of its current contractual arrangements, reviewed its existing contracts and is continuing to evaluate certain operational and corporate policies and processes in light of these findings. EOG enters into contracts for drilling services, fracturing services, compression, real estate and other contracts which contain equipment and other assets used in its exploration, development and production activities and corporate functions. Certain of these contracts will require recognition of a right-of-use asset and related lease liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, while others will require disclosure within the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



The impact upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 and other related ASUs is not quantifiable due to the pending determination by EOG of certain accounting policies, including the separation of lease and non-lease components for certain classes of underlying assets, among others. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 and other related ASUs will significantly increase assets and liabilities related to operating leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Non-cancelable operating leases, which will be considered for recognition or disclosure upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 and other related ASUs, totaled $2.0 billion on an undiscounted basis at December 31, 2018, and are included within total minimum commitments in Note 8.

EOG will elect the practical expedient under ASU 2018-11 and apply the provisions of ASU 2016-02 to determineon the impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes" (ASU 2015-17), which simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes in a classified balance sheet by eliminating the requirement to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts. Instead, ASU 2015-17 requires that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be shown as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early application is permitted.adoption date, January 1, 2019. Additionally, EOG will adoptelect the package of practical expedients within ASU 2015-172016-02 that allows an entity to not reassess prior to the effective January 1, 2017, on a retrospective basis, resulting in areclassificationdate (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, or (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases, but will not elect the practical expedient of current deferred taxes to noncurrent onhindsight when determining the Consolidated Balance Sheets, which will increase noncurrent deferred tax assets $169 million with no impact on noncurrent deferred tax liabilities.



Effective January 1, 2016,lease term of existing contracts at the effective date. EOG adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Computation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (ASU 2015-03). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2015-03, EOG restated its December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet to reclassify $4.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs from "Other Assets" to "Long-Term Debt." Debt issuance costs related to EOG's senior unsecured revolving credit facility remain classified as "Other Assets."

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers" (ASU 2014-09), which will require entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 will supersede most current guidance related to revenue recognition when it becomes effective. The new standard also will require expanded disclosures regardingelect the nature, amount, timingpractical expedient under ASU 2018-01 and certainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effectivenot evaluate existing or expired land easements not previously accounted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The new standard permits adoption through the use of either the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11 which rescinds certain SEC guidance in the ASC, including guidance relatedas leases prior to the use of the "entitlements" method of revenue recognition. EOG does not intend to early-adopt ASU 2014-09. EOG will be required to change from the entitlements method of accounting to the sales method of accounting and does not anticipate the impact will be material to the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. EOG is continuing to evaluate the remaining provisions of ASU 2014-09 and has not determined the full impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.effective date.

2.  Long-Term Debt

Long-Term Debt at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 consisted of the following (in thousands):
2016 20152018 2017
      
Commercial Paper$
 $259,718
2.500% Senior Notes due 2016
 400,000
5.875% Senior Notes due 2017600,000
 600,000
6.875% Senior Notes due 2018350,000
 350,000
$
 $350,000
5.625% Senior Notes due 2019900,000
 900,000
900,000
 900,000
4.40% Senior Notes due 2020500,000
 500,000
500,000
 500,000
2.45% Senior Notes due 2020500,000
 500,000
500,000
 500,000
4.100% Senior Notes due 2021750,000
 750,000
750,000
 750,000
2.625% Senior Notes due 20231,250,000
 1,250,000
1,250,000
 1,250,000
3.15% Senior Notes due 2025500,000
 500,000
500,000
 500,000
4.15% Senior Notes due 2026750,000
 
750,000
 750,000
6.65% Senior Notes due 2028140,000
 140,000
140,000
 140,000
3.90% Senior Notes due 2035500,000
 500,000
500,000
 500,000
5.10% Senior Notes due 2036250,000
 
250,000
 250,000
Long-Term Debt6,990,000
 6,649,718
6,040,000
 6,390,000
Capital Lease Obligation38,710
 45,064
71,571
 32,155
Less: Current Portion of Long-Term Debt6,579
 6,579
913,093
 356,235
Unamortized Debt Discount36,915
 34,518
24,640
 30,564
Debt Issuance Costs5,437
 4,774
3,669
 4,520
Total Long-Term Debt$6,979,779
 $6,648,911
$5,170,169
 $6,030,836

At December 31, 2016,2018, the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt (excluding capital lease obligations) were $600 million in 2017, $350 million in 2018, $900 million in 2019, $1 billion in 2020, and $750 million in 2021.2021, zero in 2022 and $1.25 billion in 2023.  At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, EOG had zero and $260 million, respectively, ofno outstanding short-term borrowings under theits commercial paper program and no outstanding borrowings under uncommitted credit facilities.



During 20162018 and 2015,2017, EOG utilized commercial paper bearing market interest rates, for various corporate financing purposes. EOG had no outstanding borrowings from commercial paper at December 31, 2016. The average borrowings outstanding under the commercial paper program were $130$8 million and $81$84 million during the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively. The weighted average interest rates for commercial paper borrowings were 0.76%1.97% and 0.51%1.44% for the years 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

At December 31, 2016,On October 1, 2018, EOG repaid upon maturity the $350 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.875% Senior Notes due 2018.

On September 15, 2017, EOG repaid upon maturity the $600 million aggregate principal amount of EOG'sits 5.875% Senior Notes due 2017 were reclassified as long-term debt based upon its intent and ability to ultimately replace such amount with other long-term debt.2017.

On January 14, 2016, EOG closed its sale of $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.15% Senior Notes due 2026 and $250 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.10% Senior Notes due 2036 (collectively, the New Notes). Interest on the New Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2016. Net proceeds from the New Notes offering totaled approximately $991 million and were used to repay its 2.500% Senior Notes due 2016 when they matured on February 1, 2016, and for general corporate purposes, including repayment of outstanding commercial paper borrowings and funding of future capital expenditures.

On July 21, 2015, EOG entered intocurrently has a new $2.0 billion senior unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement (2015 Agreement)(Agreement) with domestic and foreign lenders. The 2015 Agreement replaces EOG's $2.0 billion senior unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2011, which had a scheduled maturity date of October 11, 2016 (2011 Agreement). There were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the 2011 Agreement as of the closing of the 2015 Agreement and the termination of the 2011 Agreement. The 2015 Agreement has a scheduled maturity date of July 21, 2020, and includes an option for EOG to extend, on up to two occasions, the term for successive one-year periods subject to certain terms and conditions. Advances under the 2015 Agreement will accrue interest based, at EOG's option, on either the London InterBank Offered Rate plus an applicable margin (Eurodollar rate) or the base rate (as defined in the 2015 Agreement) plus an applicable margin. Consistent with the terms of the 2011 Agreement, the 2015The Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants and events of default that are customary for investment-grade, senior unsecured commercial bank credit agreements, including a financial covenant for the maintenance of a debt-to-total capitalization ratio of no greater than 65%. At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG was in compliance with this financial covenant. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the 2015 Agreement. The Eurodollar rate and applicable base rate, had there been any amounts borrowed under the 2015 Agreement at December 31, 2018, would have been 1.77%3.50% and 3.75%5.50%, respectively.

On February 1, 2016, EOG repaid upon maturity the $400 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.500% Senior Notes due 2016.

On June 1, 2015, EOG repaid upon maturity the $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.95% Senior Notes due 2015.

On March 17, 2015, EOG closed its sale of $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.15% Senior Notes due 2025 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.90% Senior Notes due 2035 (together, the Notes). Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on October 1, 2015. Net proceeds from the Notes offering of approximately $990 million were used for general corporate purposes.

3.  Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock.  In September 2001, EOG's Board of Directors (Board) authorized the purchase of an aggregate maximum of 10 million shares of Common Stock that superseded all previous authorizations.  At December 31, 2016,2018, 6,386,200 shares remained available for purchase under this authorization.  EOG last purchased shares of its Common Stock under this authorization in March 2003.  In addition, shares of Common Stock are from time to time withheld by, or returned to, EOG in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations arising upon the exercise of employee stock options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), the vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance stock or performance unit grants or in payment of the exercise price of employee stock options.  Such shares withheld or returned do not count against the Board authorization discussed above.  Shares purchased, withheld and returned are held in treasury for, among other purposes, fulfilling any obligations arising under EOG's stock-based compensation plans and any other approved transactions or activities for which such shares of Common Stock may be required.

On August 2, 2018, EOG's Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend on the common stock by 19% from the previous $0.1850 per share to $0.22 per share, effective beginning with the dividend paid on October 31, 2018, to stockholders of record as of October 17, 2018. On February 27, 2018, EOG's Board increased the quarterly cash dividend on the common stock by 10% from the previous $0.1675 per share to $0.1850 per share, effective beginning with the dividend paid on April 30, 2018, to stockholders of record as of April 16, 2018. EOG declared and paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.1675 per share in 2017 and 2016.

On February 15, 2017, the Board approved an amendment to EOG's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of EOG's authorized shares of common stock from 640 million to 1,280 million. EOG's stockholders approved the increase at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 27, 2017, and the amendment was filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 28, 2017.

On October 4, 2016, EOG issued approximately 25 million shares of EOG common stock in connection with the Yates transaction. (SeeSee Note 17.)



On February 24, 2014, EOG's Board approved a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock dividend, which was paid on March 31, 2014, to stockholders of record as of March 17, 2014. 

On August 5, 2014, the Board increased the quarterly cash dividend on the common stock by 34% to $0.1675 per share, effective beginning with the dividend paid on October 31, 2014, to stockholders of record as of October 17, 2014. On February 24, 2014, the Board increased the quarterly cash dividend on the common stock by 33% to $0.125 per share, effective beginning with the dividend paid on April 30, 2014, to stockholders of record as of April 16, 2014.

The following summarizes Common Stock activity for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 20152016, 2017 and 20162018 (in thousands):
Common SharesCommon Shares
Issued Treasury OutstandingIssued Treasury Outstanding
          
Balance at December 31, 2013546,378
 (206) 546,172
Common Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans2,448
 
 2,448
Treasury Stock Purchased (1)

 (1,209) (1,209)
Common Stock Issued Under Employee Stock Purchase Plan202
 
 202
Treasury Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 682
 682
Balance at December 31, 2014549,028
 (733) 548,295
Common Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans1,019
 
 1,019
Treasury Stock Purchased (1)

 (581) (581)
Common Stock Issued Under Employee Stock Purchase Plan104
 121
 225
Treasury Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 901
 901
Balance at December 31, 2015550,151
 (292) 549,859
550,151
 (292) 549,859
Common Stock Issued25,204
 
 25,204
25,204
 
 25,204
Common Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans1,500
 
 1,500
1,500
 
 1,500
Treasury Stock Purchased (1)

 (922) (922)
 (922) (922)
Common Stock Issued Under Employee Stock Purchase Plan95
 117
 212
95
 117
 212
Treasury Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 847
 847

 847
 847
Balance at December 31, 2016576,950
 (250) 576,700
576,950
 (250) 576,700
Common Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans1,878
 
 1,878
Treasury Stock Purchased (1)

 (686) (686)
Common Stock Issued Under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 180
 180
Treasury Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 405
 405
Balance at December 31, 2017578,828
 (351) 578,477
Common Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans1,580
 
 1,580
Treasury Stock Purchased (1)

 (539) (539)
Common Stock Issued Under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 180
 180
Treasury Stock Issued Under Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 325
 325
Balance at December 31, 2018580,408
 (385) 580,023
 
(1)Represents shares that were withheld by or returned to EOG (i) in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations that arose upon the exercise of employee stock options or SARs or the vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance stock or performance unit grants or (ii) in payment of the exercise price of employee stock options.

Preferred Stock.  EOG currently has one authorized series of preferred stock.  As of December 31, 2016,2018, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.



4.  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes certain transactions that have generally been reported in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity. The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 consisted of the following (in thousands):
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment Other TotalForeign Currency Translation Adjustment Other Total
          
December 31, 2014$(20,021) $(3,035) $(23,056)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(11,517) (129) (11,646)
Amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income (loss)
 1,572
(1) 
1,572
December 31, 2016$(19,441) $431
 $(19,010)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications2,799
 (3,728) (929)
Tax effects
 (208) (208)
 642
 642
Other comprehensive income (loss)(11,517) 1,235
 (10,282)2,799
 (3,086) (287)
December 31, 2015(31,538) (1,800) (33,338)
December 31, 2017(16,642) (2,655) (19,297)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications12,097
 2,901
 14,998
2,451
 1,131
 3,582
Amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income (loss) (1)
14,365
 
 14,365
Tax effects
 (670) (670)
 (8) (8)
Other comprehensive income12,097
 2,231
 14,328
16,816
 1,123
 17,939
December 31, 2016$(19,441) $431
 $(19,010)
December 31, 2018$174
 $(1,532) $(1,358)
 
(1)Reclassified to Net Income (Loss) - General and Administrative. Related to certain EOG pension plans.Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions, Net. See Note 7.17.

No significant amount was reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) during the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

5.  Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income, net for 2018 included interest income ($12 million), a downward adjustment to deferred compensation expense ($6 million) and equity income from investments in ammonia plants in Trinidad ($2 million), partially offset by net foreign currency transaction losses ($(7) million). Other income, net for 2017 included net foreign currency transaction gains ($8 million), interest income ($8 million) and equity income from investments in ammonia plants in Trinidad ($3 million), partially offset by an upward adjustment to deferred compensation expense ($(6) million). Other expense, net for 2016 included net foreign currency transaction losses ($(41) million) and an upward adjustment to deferred compensation expense ($(11) million), partially offset by equity income from investments in ammonia plants in Trinidad ($4 million). Other

6.  Income Taxes

As described in Note 1, EOG finalized the accounting impact of the TCJA on its provisional income tax accruals during 2018 in accordance with ASU 2018-05. Following is a description of each provisional tax accrual and the reason it was adjusted.

During the third quarter of 2018, EOG filed its consolidated 2017 U.S. federal income tax return, along with certain tax elections, and finalized its foreign earnings and profits study. The deemed repatriation tax decreased from the provisional amount of $179 million to $40 million mostly as a result of reducing the repatriation taxable income by net operating losses (NOLs). EOG previously expected to pay the repatriation tax in installments over eight years and preserve NOLs for 2015 included equity income from investmentsutilization in ammonia plantsfuture years, as allowed by the TCJA. However, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stated in Trinidad ($9 million),recent guidance that no tax refunds would be issued until the entire repatriation tax liability is satisfied, regardless of the installment election. As a downward adjustmentresult, EOG did not make the installment election and instead utilized NOLs to reduce the repatriation taxable income. EOG has reviewed the tax consequences of the repatriation tax on its outside basis differences in its investment in non-U.S. subsidiaries and no U.S. federal deferred compensation expense ($6 million), interest income ($3 million) and net foreign currency transaction losses ($(17) million).  Other expense, net, for 2014 included net foreign currency transaction losses ($(34) million), losses on dispositions of warehouse stock ($(15) million) and equity income from investments in ammonia plants in Trinidad ($8 million). tax liability is currently required.



EOG recorded a provisional amount in 2017 for its refundable alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits due to the lack of guidance, at that time, on whether any portion of these credits would be sequestered due to a federal budgetary provision. In the first quarter of 2018, the IRS affirmed that any refundable AMT credits resulting from the TCJA would be subject to sequestration. However, in the fourth quarter of 2018, the IRS reversed their decision. Accordingly, EOG eliminated the provisional sequestration accrual and recognized a $42 million tax benefit for the year.

6.  Income TaxesThe remeasurement of U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in a provisional net tax benefit of $2.2 billion in 2017, which was increased by approximately $52 million in the third quarter of 2018 due to the utilization of the aforementioned NOLs at the 2017 U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 35% instead of the future tax rate of 21%. This tax benefit, along with the sequestration benefit and other less significant tax reform adjustments, lowered the 2018 full year effective tax rate approximately three percentage points.

The principal components of EOG's total net deferred income tax liabilities at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 were as follows (in thousands):
2016 20152018 2017
Current Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities)   
Commodity Hedging Contracts$22,206
 $
Deferred Compensation Plans43,984
 38,559
Alternative Minimum Tax Credit Carryforward84,426
 93,316
Foreign Net Operating Loss37,251
 47,786
Foreign Valuation Allowance(28,097) (35,536)
Accrued Expenses and Liabilities13,754
 
Other(4,137) 3,687
Total Net Current Deferred Income Tax Assets$169,387
 $147,812
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities) 
  
Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities) 
  
Foreign Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Costs Deducted for Tax Under Book Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization$(39,852) $(57,569)$4,359
 $(40,851)
Foreign Net Operating Loss314,899
 443,010
55,175
 423,258
Foreign Valuation Allowances(268,499) (380,104)(58,932) (365,379)
Foreign Other438
 1,506
175
 478
Total Net Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets$6,986
 $6,843
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax (Assets) Liabilities 
  
Total Net Deferred Income Tax Assets$777
 $17,506
Deferred Income Tax (Assets) Liabilities 
  
Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Costs Deducted for Tax Over Book Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization$5,899,533
 $5,299,817
$4,819,222
 $3,894,739
Commodity Hedging Contracts4,883
 (12,008)
Deferred Compensation Plans(39,086) (35,832)
Accrued Expenses and Liabilities(19,097) 12,094
Net Operating Loss - Federal
 (69,262)
Non-Producing Leasehold Costs(64,898) (53,026)(88,594) (47,981)
Seismic Costs Capitalized for Tax(161,920) (162,240)(164,932) (109,423)
Equity Awards(139,787) (140,663)(93,977) (92,696)
Capitalized Interest86,504
 98,242
17,821
 51,345
Alternative Minimum Tax Credit Carryforward(673,205) (685,189)
 (77,114)
Undistributed Foreign Earnings280,099
 258,403
22,945
 19,684
Other(37,686) (27,442)(45,787) (15,332)
Total Net Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liabilities$5,188,640
 $4,587,902
Total Net Deferred Income Tax Liabilities$5,012,267
 $4,433,247
$4,413,398
 $3,518,214
Total Net Deferred Income Tax Liabilities$4,412,621
 $3,500,708

The components of Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes for the years indicated below were as follows (in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
United States$(1,520,573) $(6,840,119) $5,161,232
$4,084,156
 $621,610
 $(1,520,573)
Foreign(36,932) (81,437) (165,917)156,842
 39,572
 (36,932)
Total$(1,557,505) $(6,921,556) $4,995,315
$4,240,998
 $661,182
 $(1,557,505)



The principal components of EOG's Income Tax Provision (Benefit) for the years indicated below were as follows (in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Current:          
Federal$11,567
 $21,719
 $269,326
$(303,853) $33,058
 $11,567
State(8,369) 9,404
 22,835
17,048
 (2,502) (8,369)
Foreign51,189
 54,143
 82,721
65,615
 35,323
 51,189
Total54,387
 85,266
 374,882
(221,190) 65,879
 54,387
Deferred: 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal(532,979) (2,362,926) 1,608,706
862,075
 (1,504,288) (532,979)
State4,876
 (127,444) 29,056
43,293
 26,942
 4,876
Foreign12,897
 8,063
 67,184
(11,212) 3,474
 12,897
Total(515,206) (2,482,307) 1,704,946
894,156
 (1,473,872) (515,206)
Other Non-Current:     
Federal148,992
(1)(513,404)(2)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)$(460,819) $(2,397,041) $2,079,828
$821,958
 $(1,921,397) $(460,819)
(1)Includes change in refundable AMT credits and the reversal of the repatriation tax accrued in 2017. See previous discussion regarding the filing of EOG's 2017 U.S. federal income tax return for details.
(2)Includes refundable AMT credits net of the repatriation tax that was expected to be paid post-2017.

The differences between taxes computed at the United StatesU.S. federal statutory tax rate and EOG's effective rate for the years indicated below were as follows:
2016 2015 2014
     2018 2017 2016
Statutory Federal Income Tax Rate35.00 % 35.00 % 35.00 %21.00 % 35.00 % 35.00 %
State Income Tax, Net of Federal Benefit0.15
 1.11
 0.68
1.12
 3.38
 0.15
Income Tax Provision Related to Foreign Operations(1.23) (1.31) (0.12)0.51
 (0.30) (1.23)
Income Tax Provision Related to Trinidad Operations(3.71) 
 

 
 (3.71)
Canadian Divestiture
 
 (3.46)
Undistributed Foreign Earnings
 
 4.94
Foreign Valuation Allowances
 
 6.47
Foreign Oil and Gas Impairments
 
 (1.90)
Income Tax Provision Related to United Kingdom Operations
 1.78
 
Income Tax Provision Related to Canadian Operations
 2.30
 
TCJA(2.60)(1)(328.10)(2)
Share-Based Compensation (3)
(0.47) (4.63) 
Other(0.62) (0.17) 0.03
(0.18) (0.03) (0.62)
Effective Income Tax Rate29.59 % 34.63 % 41.64 %19.38 % (290.60)% 29.59 %

The effective tax rate of 30% in 2016 was lower than the prior year rate of 35% primarily due to the effects of recording additional Trinidad taxes resulting from a tax settlement reached during the year.
(1)Includes impact of utilizing certain tax NOLs ((1.2)%), the IRS's reversal of its sequestration decision ((1.0)%) and other tax reform impacts ((0.4)%).
(2)Includes impact of the federal rate reduction ((327.8)%), federal repatriation tax ((6.6)%), sequestration (6.4%) and other tax reform impacts ((0.1)%).
(3)Effective January 1, 2017, EOG adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" (ASU 2016-09), which provides that share-based compensation tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized in the income tax provision.

Deferred tax assets are recorded for certain tax benefits, including tax net operating losses (NOLs)NOLs and tax credit carryforwards, provided that management assesses the utilization of such assets to be "more likely than not." Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. On the basis of this evaluation, EOG has recorded valuation allowances for the portion of certain foreign and state deferred tax assets that management does not believe are more likely than not to be realized.



The principal components of EOG's rollforward of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets for the years indicated below were as follows (in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Beginning Balance$506,127
 $463,018
 $223,599
$466,421
 $383,221
 $506,127
Increase (1)
37,221
 146,602
 392,729
23,062
 67,333
 37,221
Decrease (2)
(12,667) (4,315) (1,424)(26,219) (13,687) (12,667)
Other (3)
(147,460) (99,178) (151,886)(296,122) 29,554
 (147,460)
Ending Balance$383,221
 $506,127
 $463,018
$167,142
 $466,421
 $383,221
 
(1)Increase in valuation allowance related to the generation of tax net operating lossesNOLs and other deferred tax assets.
(2)Decrease in valuation allowance associated with adjustments to certain deferred tax assets and their related allowance.
(3)Represents dispositions/revisions/dispositions, revisions and/or foreign exchange rate variances and the effect of statutory income tax rate changes. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.

As of December 31, 2018, EOG had state income tax NOLs being carried forward of approximately $1.8 billion, which, if unused, expire between 2019 and 2037. EOG also has Canadian NOLs of $183 million which can be carried forward 20 years. As described above, these NOLs as well as other less significant future tax benefits, have been evaluated for the likelihood of utilization, and valuation allowances have been established for the portion of these deferred income tax assets that do not meet the “more likely than not” threshold.

The balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016,2018, was $36$29 million, resulting from the tax treatment of its research and experimental expenditures related to certain innovations in its horizontal drilling and completion projects, of which $2$12 million may potentially have an earnings impact. EOG records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits to its income tax provision. Currently $2 million of interest has been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income.Income (Loss). EOG does not anticipate that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change materially during the next twelve months. EOG and its subsidiaries file income tax returns and are subject to tax audits in the United StatesU.S. and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. EOG's earliest open tax years in its principal jurisdictions are as follows: United StatesU.S. federal (2011)(2016), Canada (2012), United Kingdom (2015)(2014), Trinidad (2010)(2013) and China (2008).

EOG's foreign subsidiaries' undistributed earnings of approximately $2 billion at December 31, 2016, are no longernot considered to be permanently reinvested outside of the United StatesU.S. Accordingly, EOG may be required to accrue certain U.S. federal, state, and accordingly,foreign deferred income taxes on these undistributed earnings as well as on any other outside basis differences related to its investments in these subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2018, EOG has cumulatively recorded $280$23 million of United Statesdeferred foreign income taxes for withholdings on its undistributed foreign earnings. Additionally, for tax years beginning in 2018 and later, EOG's foreign earnings may be subject to the U.S. federal foreign and state deferred income taxes."global intangible low-taxed income" (GILTI) inclusion. EOG changed its permanent reinvestment assertion in 2014.

In 2016, EOG's alternative minimumrecords any GILTI tax (AMT) credits were reduced by $21 million mostly as a result of carry-back claims and certain elections. Remaining AMT credits of $758 million, resulting from AMT paid in prior years, will be carried forward indefinitely until they are used to offset regular income taxes in future periods. The ability of EOG to utilize these AMT credit carryforwards to reduce federal income taxes may become subject to various limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. Such limitations may arise if certain ownership changes (as defined for income tax purposes) were to occur.

As of December 31, 2016, EOG had state income tax net operating losses (NOLs) being carried forward of approximately $1.6 billion, which, if unused, expire between 2017 and 2035. During 2016, EOG's United Kingdom subsidiary incurred a tax NOL of approximately $38 million which, along with prior years' NOLs of $740 million, will be carried forward indefinitely. As described above, these NOLs have been evaluated for the likelihood of future utilization, and valuation allowances have been established for the portion of these deferred tax assets that do not meet the "more likely than not" threshold.period expense.

7.  Employee Benefit Plans

Stock-Based Compensation

During 2016,2018, EOG maintained various stock-based compensation plans as discussed below.  EOG recognizes compensation expense on grants of stock options, SARs, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance units and performance stock, and grants made under the EOG Resources, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).  Stock-based compensation expense is calculated based upon the grant date estimated fair value of the awards, net of forfeitures, based upon EOG's historical employee turnover rate.  Compensation expense is amortized over the shorter of the vesting period or the period from date of grant until the date the employee becomes eligible to retire without company approval.



Stock-based compensation expense is included on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) based upon the job functions of the employees receiving the grants.  Compensation expense related to EOG's stock-based compensation plans for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 was as follows (in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Lease and Well$38
 $44
 $41
$51
 $41
 $38
Gathering and Processing Costs1
 1
 1
1
 1
 1
Exploration Costs21
 26
 27
25
 23
 21
General and Administrative68
 60
 76
78
 69
 68
Total$128
 $131
 $145
$155
 $134
 $128

The Amended and Restated EOG Resources, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (2008 Plan) provides for grants of stock options, SARs, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance stock and performance units, and other stock-based awards. 

Beginning with the grants made effective September 25, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of EOG (Committee) approved revised vesting schedules for grants of stock options, SARs, restricted stock and restricted stock units, and performance units. These revised vesting schedules will apply to all future grants as well, until revised, amended or otherwise determined by the Committee.
Grant TypePrevious Vesting ScheduleRevised Vesting Schedule
Stock Options/SARsVesting in 25% increments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grantVesting in increments of 33%, 33% and 34% on each of the first three anniversaries, respectively, of the date of grant
Restricted Stock/Restricted Stock Units"Cliff" vesting five years from the date of grant"Cliff" vesting three years from the date of grant
Performance Units"Cliff" vesting five years from the date of grant (except for the December 2016 grant, which will "cliff" vest approximately three years from the date of grant)
"Cliff" vesting approximately 41 months from the date of grant - specifically, on the February 28th immediately following the Committee’s certifications contemplated by the form of award agreement governing grants of performance units

At December 31, 2016,2018, approximately 21.513.7 million common shares remained available for grant under the 2008 Plan.  EOG's policy is to issue shares related to the 2008 Plan from previously authorized unissued shares or treasury shares to the extent treasury shares are available.

During 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, EOG issued shares in connection with stock option/SAR exercises, restricted stock and performance stock grants, restricted stock unit and performance unit releases and ESPP purchases.  Effective January 1, 2017, with the adoption of ASU 2016-09, EOG began recognizing income tax associated with excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as discrete benefits and expenses, respectively, in the income tax provision. Net excess tax benefits recognized within the income tax provision were $20 million and $32 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, EOG recognized, as an adjustment to APIC,Additional Paid in Capital, federal income tax benefits of $29 million $26 million and $99 million for 2016 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to the exercise of stock options/SARs and the release of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock and performance units.



Stock Options and Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights and Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Participants in EOG's stock-based compensation plans (including the 2008 Plan) have been or may be granted options to purchase shares of Common Stock.  In addition, participants in EOG's stock plans (including the 2008 Plan) have been or may be granted SARs, representing the right to receive shares of Common Stock based on the appreciation in the stock price from the date of grant on the number of SARs granted.  Stock options and SARs are granted at a price not less than the market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant.  Stock options and SARs granted vest on a graded vesting schedule up to four years from the date of grant based on the nature of the grants and as defined in individual grant agreements.  Terms for stock options and SARs granted have generally not exceeded a maximum term of seven years.  EOG's ESPP allows eligible employees to semi-annually purchase, through payroll deductions, shares of Common Stock at 85 percent of the fair market value at specified dates.  Contributions to the ESPP are limited to 10 percent of the employee's pay (subject to certain ESPP limits) during each of the two six-month offering periods each year.

The fair value of stock option grants and SAR grants is estimated using the Hull-White II binomial option pricing model.  The fair value of ESPP grants is estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton model.  Stock-based compensation expense related to stock option, SAR and ESPP grants totaled $57$60 million, $56 million and $62$57 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

Weighted average fair values and valuation assumptions used to value stock option, SAR and ESPP grants for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 were as follows:
Stock Options/SARs ESPPStock Options/SARs ESPP
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
                      
Weighted Average Fair Value of Grants$25.78
 $21.88
 $30.75
 $19.21
 $21.21
 $21.65
$33.46
 $23.95
 $25.78
 $25.75
 $22.20
 $19.21
Expected Volatility31.54% 38.03% 35.28% 36.55% 32.08% 25.03%28.23% 28.28% 31.54% 24.59% 27.12% 36.55%
Risk-Free Interest Rate0.78% 0.83% 0.95% 0.44% 0.12% 0.08%2.68% 1.52% 0.78% 1.89% 0.88% 0.44%
Dividend Yield0.76% 0.85% 0.61% 0.82% 0.73% 0.46%0.72% 0.75% 0.76% 0.64% 0.71% 0.82%
Expected Life5.4 years
 5.3 years
 5.2 years
 0.5 years
 0.5 years
 0.5 years
5.0 years
 5.1 years
 5.4 years
 0.5 years
 0.5 years
 0.5 years

Expected volatility is based on an equal weighting of historical volatility and implied volatility from traded options in EOG's Common Stock.  The risk-free interest rate is based upon United States Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant.  The expected life is based upon historical experience and contractual terms of stock option, SAR and ESPP grants.


The following table sets forth the stock option and SAR transactions for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (stock options and SARs in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Number
of Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 Number
of Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 Number
of Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
Number
of Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 Number
of Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 Number
of Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
                      
Outstanding at January 110,744
 $67.98
 10,493
 $64.96
 10,452
 $54.43
9,103
 $83.89
 9,850
 $75.53
 10,744
 $67.98
Granted1,855
 94.82
 2,037
 69.99
 2,146
 101.55
1,906
 126.49
 2,274
 96.27
 1,855
 94.82
Exercised (1)
(2,376) 54.56
 (1,518) 47.64
 (1,718) 45.68
(2,493) 72.21
 (2,574) 61.12
 (2,376) 54.56
Forfeited(373) 87.38
 (268) 80.31
 (387) 68.95
(206) 94.43
 (447) 93.84
 (373) 87.38
Outstanding at December 319,850
 75.53
 10,744
 67.98
 10,493
 64.96
8,310
 96.90
 9,103
 83.89
 9,850
 75.53
Stock Options/SARs Exercisable at December 315,613
 66.48
 5,993
 57.96
 5,287
 49.40
3,969
 85.82
 4,510
 75.76
 5,613
 66.48
 
(1)The total intrinsic value of stock options/SARs exercised during the years 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015 and 2014 was $84$118 million, $60$95 million and $95$84 million, respectively.  The intrinsic value is based upon the difference between the market price of the Common Stock on the date of exercise and the grant price of the stock options/SARs.

At December 31, 2016,2018, there were 9.58.0 million stock options/SARs vested or expected to vest with a weighted average grant price of $75.12$96.43 per share, an intrinsic value of $249$34.6 million and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.84.4 years.



The following table summarizes certain information for the stock options and SARs outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 20162018 (stock options and SARs in thousands):
Stock Options/SARs Outstanding Stock Options/SARs Exercisable
Range of
Grant
Prices
 Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 
 
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value(1)
 Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 
 
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
                 
$ 34.00 to $  55.99 1,906
 1 $43.68
   1,906
 1 $43.68
   
 56.00 to    69.99 2,922
 4 64.12
   1,654
 3 60.09
   
   70.00 to     94.99 1,526
 3 84.62
   1,072
 3 84.49
   
   95.00 to     99.99 1,794
 7 95.10
   23
 3 97.31
   
 100.00 to   116.99 1,702
 4 102.02
   958
 4 102.00
   
  9,850
 4 75.53
 $253,400
 5,613
 3 66.48
 $195,186
Stock Options/SARs Outstanding Stock Options/SARs Exercisable
Range of
Grant
Prices
 Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 
 
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value(1)
 Stock
Options/
SARs
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 
 
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
                 
$ 50.00 to $  82.99 1,528
 3 $65.46
   1,183
 2 $64.27
   
 83.00 to    95.99 2,046
 4 91.48
   1,290
 3 89.50
   
   96.00 to     96.99 1,961
 6 96.29
   618
 5 96.29
   
   97.00 to   125.99 957
 3 102.77
   872
 3 101.91
   
 126.00 to   129.99 1,818
 7 127.01
   6
 1 127.00
   
  8,310
 5 96.90
 $35,083
 3,969
 3 85.82
 $28,993
 
(1)Based upon the difference between the closing market price of the Common Stock on the last trading day of the year and the grant price of in-the-money stock options and SARs.

At December 31, 2016,2018, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock option and SAR grants totaled $95$106 million.  This unrecognized expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 2.81.7 years.

At the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, EOG stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the ESPP to (among other changes) increase the number of shares available for grant. At December 31, 2016,2018, approximately 356,0002.5 million shares of Common Stock remained available for issuancegrant under the ESPP.  The following table summarizes ESPP activitiesactivity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in thousands, except number of participants):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Approximate Number of Participants1,746
 1,963
 1,991
1,934
 1,870
 1,746
Shares Purchased212
 225
 202
180
 180
 212
Aggregate Purchase Price$13,787
 $15,045
 $14,927
$14,887
 $13,997
 $13,787

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Employees may be granted restricted (non-vested) stock and/or restricted stock units without cost to them.  The restricted stock and restricted stock units generally vest five years after the date of grant, except for certain bonus grants, and as defined in individual grant agreements.  Upon vesting of restricted stock, shares of Common Stock are released to the employee.  Upon vesting, restricted stock units are converted into shares of Common Stock and released to the employee.  Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock units totaled $60$81 million, $69$68 million and $74$60 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.



The following table sets forth the restricted stock and restricted stock unit transactions for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (shares and units in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Number of
Shares and
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Number of
Shares and
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Number of
Shares and
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of Shares and Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares and Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares and Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
                      
Outstanding at January 14,908
 $70.35
 5,394
 $64.39
 7,358
 $49.54
3,905
 $88.57
 3,962
 $79.63
 4,908
 $70.35
Granted853
 88.01
 1,044
 77.94
 1,132
 98.72
812
 117.55
 1,095
 97.34
 853
 88.01
Released (1)
(1,465) 53.95
 (1,331) 51.52
 (2,761) 105.24
(740) 78.16
 (929) 61.51
 (1,465) 53.95
Forfeited(334) 77.29
 (199) 74.56
 (335) 62.55
(185) 92.12
 (223) 85.45
 (334) 77.29
Outstanding at December 31 (2)
3,962
 79.63
 4,908
 70.35
 5,394
 64.39
3,792
 96.64
 3,905
 88.57
 3,962
 79.63
 
(1)The total intrinsic value of restricted stock and restricted stock units released during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015 and 2014 was $124$84 million, $109$91 million and $291$124 million, respectively. The intrinsic value is based upon the closing price of EOG's common stock on the date restricted stock and restricted stock units are released.
(2)The total intrinsic value of restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 was approximately $401$331 million, $421 million and $347$401 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2016,2018, unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock units totaled $153$172 million. Such unrecognized expense will be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 2.51.9 years.

Performance Units and Performance Stock. EOG has granted performance units and/or performance stock (Performance Awards) to its executive officers annually since 2012. As more fully discussed in the grant agreements, the performance metric applicable to these performance-based grants is EOG's total shareholder return over a three-year performance period relative to the total shareholder return of a designated group of peer companies (Performance Period). Upon the application of the performance multiple at the completion of the Performance Period, a minimum of 0% and a maximum of 200% of the Performance Awards granted could be outstanding. Subject to the termination provisions set forth in the grant agreements and the applicable performance multiple, the grants of Performance Awards will generally "cliff" vest five years from the date of grant. The fair value of the Performance Awards is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. Stock-based compensation expense related to the Performance AwardsAward grants totaled $11$14 million, $5$10 million and $9$11 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

At December 31, 2015, 405,000 Performance Awards were outstanding. Upon completion of the Performance Period for the Performance Awards granted in 2012, a performance multiple of 200% was applied to the 2012 grants resulting in an additional grant of 142,556 Performance Awards in February 2016. During the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016, a total of 131,750 Performance Awards were granted. A total of 134,016 Performance Awards were released during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, with a total intrinsic value of $9.7 million, based upon the closing price of EOG's common stock on the release date. Upon the application of the performance multiple at the completion of the remaining Performance Periods, a minimum of 151,096 and a maximum of 939,484 Performance Awards could be outstanding. There were 545,290 Performance Awards outstanding as of December 31, 2016. The total intrinsic value of Performance Awards outstanding at December 31, 2016 was $55.1 million.

Upon completion of the performance period for the Performance Awards granted in 2013, a performance multiple of 200% was applied to the 2013 grants resulting in an additional grant of 118,834 Performance Awards in February 2017.



      Weighted average fair values and valuation assumptions used to value performance unit and performance stock grantsPerformance Awards during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 were as follows:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Weighted Average Fair Value of Grants$119.10
 $80.64
 $119.27
$136.74
 $113.81
 $119.10
Expected Volatility32.48% 29.35% 32.18%29.92% 32.19% 32.48%
Risk-Free Interest Rate1.15% 1.07% 1.18%2.85% 1.60% 1.15%

Expected volatility is based on the term-matched historical volatility over the simulated term, which is calculated as the time between the grant date and the end of the performance period.Performance Period. The risk-free interest rate is based on a 3.25 year zero-coupon risk-free interest rate derived from the Treasury Constant Maturities yield curve on the grant date.



The following table sets forth the Performance Award transactions for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (shares and units in thousands):
 2018 2017 2016
 Number of Units and Shares  Weighted Average Price per Grant Date Number of Units and Shares Weighted Average Price per Grant Date Number of Units and Shares Weighted Average Price per Grant Date
             
Outstanding at January 1502
  $90.96
 545
 $80.92
 405
 $74.93
Granted113
  125.73
 78
 96.29
 132
 100.95
Granted for Performance Multiple (1)
72
  101.87
 119
 84.43
 142
 56.21
Released (2)
(148)  84.43
 (240) 66.69
 (134) 56.21
Forfeited
  
 
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31 (3)
539
(4) 101.53
 502
 90.96
 545
 80.92
(1)Upon completion of the Performance Period for the Performance Awards granted in 2014, 2013 and 2012, a performance multiple of 200% was applied to each of the grants resulting in additional grants of Performance Awards in February 2018, 2017 and 2016.
(2)The total intrinsic value of Performance Awards released during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $18 million, $24 million and $10 million, respectively.
(3)The total intrinsic value of Performance Awards outstanding at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $47 million, $54 million and $55 million, respectively.
(4)Upon the application of the relevant performance multiple at the completion of each of the remaining Performance Periods, a minimum of 144 and a maximum of 934 Performance Awards could be outstanding. The intrinsic value is based upon the closing price of EOG's common stock on the date Performance Awards are released.

At December 31, 2016,2018, unrecognized compensation expense related to performance unitsPerformance Awards totaled $10 million. Such unrecognized expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 3.01.7 years.

Upon completion of the Performance Period for the Performance Awards granted in 2015, a performance multiple of 200% was applied to the 2015 grants resulting in an additional grant of 71,805 Performance Awards in February 2019.

Pension Plans.  EOG has a defined contribution pension plan in place for most of its employees in the United States.  EOG's contributions to the pension plan are based on various percentages of compensation and, in some instances, are based upon the amount of the employees' contributions.  EOG's total costs recognized for the plan were $43 million, $37 million and $34 million $36 millionfor 2018, 2017 and $41 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In addition, EOG's Trinidadian subsidiary maintains a contributory defined benefit pension plan and a matched savings plan.  EOG's United Kingdom subsidiary maintainsmaintained a pension plan which includesincluded a non-contributory defined contribution pension plan and a matched defined contribution savings plan.  These pension plans are available to most employees of the Trinidadian subsidiary and were available to most employees of the United Kingdom subsidiaries.subsidiary.  EOG's combined contributions to these plans were $1 million, $1 millionfor each of 2018, 2017 and $5 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018.

For the Trinidadian defined benefit pension plan, the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and accrued benefit cost totaled $8$11 million, $7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016, and $9 million, $7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015. In connection with the divestiture of substantially all of its Canadian assets in the fourth quarter of 2014, EOG has elected to terminate the Canadian non-contributory defined benefit pension plan.2018, and $10 million, $8 million and $0.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017.

Postretirement Health Care. EOG has postretirement medical and dental benefits in place for eligible United States and Trinidad employees and their eligible dependents, the costs of which are not material.



8.  Commitments and Contingencies

Letters of Credit and Guarantees. At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, EOG had standby letters of credit and guarantees outstanding totaling approximately $226$294 million and $272$174 million, primarily representing guarantees of payment or performance obligations on behalf of subsidiaries. As of February 20, 2017, there were19, 2019, EOG had received no demands for payment under these guarantees.



Minimum Commitments.  At December 31, 2016,2018, total minimum commitments from long-term non-cancelable operating leases, drilling rig commitments, seismic purchase obligations, fracturing services obligations, other purchase obligations and transportation and storage service commitments, based on current transportation and storage rates and the foreign currency exchange rates used to convert Canadian dollars and British pounds into United States dollars at December 31, 2016,2018, were as follows (in thousands):
Total Minimum
Commitments
Total Minimum
Commitments
  
2017$1,201,092
2018934,037
2019673,452
$2,150,978
2020460,178
1,416,968
2021334,601
996,344
2022 and beyond674,287
2022803,240
2023509,373
2024 and beyond931,142
$4,277,647
$6,808,045

Included in the table above are leases for buildings, facilities and equipment with varying expiration dates through 2042.  Rental expenses associated with existing leases amounted to $233 million, $200 million, and $204 million $229 millionfor 2018, 2017 and $237 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Contingencies. There are currently various suits and claims pending against EOG that have arisen in the ordinary course of EOG's business, including contract disputes, personal injury and property damage claims and title disputes.  While the ultimate outcome and impact on EOG cannot be predicted, management believes that the resolution of these suits and claims will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on EOG's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.  EOG records reserves for contingencies when information available indicates that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

9.  Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in thousands, except per share data):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Numerator for Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share -          
Net Income (Loss)$(1,096,686) $(4,524,515) $2,915,487
$3,419,040
 $2,582,579
 $(1,096,686)
Denominator for Basic Earnings per Share - 
  
  
 
  
  
Weighted Average Shares553,384
 545,697
 543,443
576,578
 574,620
 553,384
Potential Dilutive Common Shares - 
  
  
 
  
  
Stock Options/SARs
 
 2,526
1,137
 1,466
 
Restricted Stock/Units and Performance Units/Stock
 
 2,570
2,726
 2,607
 
Denominator for Diluted Earnings per Share - 
  
  
 
  
  
Adjusted Diluted Weighted Average Shares553,384
 545,697
 548,539
580,441
 578,693
 553,384
Net Income (Loss) Per Share 
  
  
 
  
  
Basic$(1.98) $(8.29) $5.36
$5.93
 $4.49
 $(1.98)
Diluted$(1.98) $(8.29) $5.32
$5.89
 $4.46
 $(1.98)



The diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options, SARs, restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive.  Shares underlying the excluded stock options and SARs totaled 10.30.6 million, 10.22.6 million and 0.710.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively, 4.5 million and 5.3 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded.

10.  Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Interest, Net of Capitalized Interest$252,030
 $222,088
 $197,383
$243,279
 $275,305
 $252,030
Income Taxes, Net of Refunds Received$(39,293) $41,108
 $342,741
$75,634
 $188,946
 $(39,293)

EOG's accrued capital expenditures at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015were $592 million, $475 million and 2014 were $388 million, $416respectively.

Non-cash investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, included additions of $362 million to EOG's oil and $972gas properties as a result of property exchanges and an addition of $49 million respectively.to EOG's other property, plant and equipment primarily in connection with a capital lease transaction in the Permian Basin.

Non-cash investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017, included non-cash additions of $282 million to EOG's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges.

Non-cash investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016, included $3,834 million in non-cash additions to EOG's oil and gas properties related to the Yates transaction (see Note 17).

Non-cash investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 included non-cash additions of $5 million to EOG's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges.

11.  Business Segment Information

EOG's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related. The Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements.  Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.  EOG's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and other key officers.  This group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of EOG's major producing areas in the United States, Trinidad, China and the United Kingdom and China.(EOG sold its United Kingdom operations in the fourth quarter of 2018).  For segment reporting purposes, the chief operating decision maker considers the major United States producing areas to be one operating segment.



As previously reported, during the fourth quarter of 2014, EOG completed the sale of substantially all of its Canadian operations (see Note 17). As a result, information relating to EOG's remaining Canadian operations has been included in the Other International segment and prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Financial information by reportable segment is presented below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in thousands):

United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
2016       
2018       
Crude Oil and Condensate$4,265,036
 $9,600
 $42,705
 $4,317,341
$9,390,244
 $17,059
 $110,137
 $9,517,440
Natural Gas Liquids437,238
 
 12
 437,250
1,127,510
 
 
 1,127,510
Natural Gas475,715
 234,108
 32,329
 742,152
970,866
 285,053
 45,618
 1,301,537
Gains (Losses) on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts(99,608) 
 
 (99,608)
Losses on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts(165,640) 
 
 (165,640)
Gathering, Processing and Marketing1,967,390
 (1,131) 
 1,966,259
5,227,051
 3,304
 
 5,230,355
Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions, Net196,043
 (145) 9,937
 205,835
Gains on Asset Dispositions, Net154,852
 4,493
 15,217
 174,562
Other, Net81,386
 (8) 25
 81,403
89,708
 (49) (24) 89,635
Net Operating Revenues (2)
7,323,200
 242,424
 85,008
 7,650,632
Operating Revenues and Other (2)
16,794,591
 309,860
 170,948
 17,275,399
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,365,390
 145,591
 42,436
 3,553,417
3,296,499
 91,971
 46,938
 3,435,408
Operating (Loss) Income(1,192,338) 46,473
 (79,416) (1,225,281)
Operating Income (Loss)4,334,364
 147,240
 (12,258) 4,469,346
Interest Income358
 932
 1,329
 2,619
9,326
 1,612
 608
 11,546
Other (Expense) Income(15,703) 2,667
 (40,126) (53,162)
Other Income (Expense)9,580
 2,436
 (6,858) 5,158
Net Interest Expense298,125
 
 (16,444) 281,681
253,352
 
 (8,300) 245,052
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes(1,505,808) 50,072
 (101,769) (1,557,505)4,099,918
 151,288
 (10,208) 4,240,998
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)(516,180) 64,281
 (8,920) (460,819)
Income Tax Provision765,986
 54,272
 1,700
 821,958
Additions to Oil and Gas Properties, Excluding Dry Hole Costs6,223,228
 75,407
 30,734
 6,329,369
6,155,874
 1,618
 37,838
 6,195,330
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net25,221,517
 274,850
 210,711
 25,707,078
27,786,086
 210,183
 79,250
 28,075,519
Total Assets27,907,083
 889,253
 663,097
 29,459,433
33,178,733
 629,633
 126,108
 33,934,474


United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
2015       
2017       
Crude Oil and Condensate$4,917,731
 $13,122
 $3,709
 $4,934,562
$6,225,711
 $13,572
 $17,113
 $6,256,396
Natural Gas Liquids407,570
 
 88
 407,658
729,545
 
 16
 729,561
Natural Gas637,452
 368,639
 54,947
 1,061,038
615,512
 271,101
 35,321
 921,934
Gains on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts61,924
 
 
 61,924
19,828
 
 
 19,828
Gathering, Processing and Marketing2,254,477
 (1,342) 
 2,253,135
3,298,098
 (11) 
 3,298,087
Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions, Net(12,176) 393
 2,985
 (8,798)
Losses on Asset Dispositions, Net(98,233) (8) (855) (99,096)
Other, Net47,464
 (3) 448
 47,909
81,610
 59
 (59) 81,610
Net Operating Revenues (3)
8,314,442
 380,809
 62,177
 8,757,428
Operating Revenues and Other (3)
10,872,071
 284,713
 51,536
 11,208,320
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,139,863
 154,853
 18,928
 3,313,644
3,269,196
 115,321
 24,870
 3,409,387
Operating Income (Loss)(6,566,282) 175,658
 (295,455) (6,686,079)933,571
 101,010
 (108,179) 926,402
Interest Income1,913
 389
 1,167
 3,469
3,223
 2,201
 2,289
 7,713
Other Income (Expense)6,461
 8,780
 (16,794) (1,553)(9,659) 3,337
 7,761
 1,439
Net Interest Expense274,606
 1,400
 (38,613) 237,393
303,941
 
 (29,569) 274,372
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes(6,832,514) 183,427
 (272,469) (6,921,556)623,194
 106,548
 (68,560) 661,182
Income Tax Provision(2,463,213) 63,502
 2,670
 (2,397,041)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)(1,964,343) 38,798
 4,148
 (1,921,397)
Additions to Oil and Gas Properties, Excluding Dry Hole Costs4,495,730
 102,358
 112,316
 4,710,404
4,067,359
 145,937
 14,932
 4,228,228
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net23,593,995
 350,766
 265,960
 24,210,721
25,125,427
 313,357
 226,253
 25,665,037
Total Assets25,347,134
 886,826
 736,510
 26,970,470
28,312,599
 974,477
 546,002
 29,833,078
2014 
  
  
  
2016 
  
  
  
Crude Oil and Condensate$9,526,149
 $29,604
 $186,727
 $9,742,480
$4,265,036
 $9,600
 $42,705
 $4,317,341
Natural Gas Liquids924,454
 
 9,597
 934,051
437,238
 
 12
 437,250
Natural Gas1,321,175
 483,071
 112,140
 1,916,386
475,715
 234,108
 32,329
 742,152
Gains on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts834,273
 
 
 834,273
Losses on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts(99,608) 
 
 (99,608)
Gathering, Processing and Marketing4,040,024
 6,064
 228
 4,046,316
1,967,390
 (1,131) 
 1,966,259
Gains on Asset Dispositions, Net96,339
 
 411,251
 507,590
Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions, Net196,043
 (145) 9,937
 205,835
Other, Net49,950
 37
 4,257
 54,244
81,386
 (8) 25
 81,403
Net Operating Revenues (4)
16,792,364
 518,776
 724,200
 18,035,340
Operating Revenues and Other (4)
7,323,200
 242,424
 85,008
 7,650,632
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,684,943
 188,592
 123,506
 3,997,041
3,365,390
 145,591
 42,436
 3,553,417
Operating Income (Loss)5,074,911
 277,471
 (110,559) 5,241,823
(1,192,338) 46,473
 (79,416) (1,225,281)
Interest Income849
 253
 1,137
 2,239
358
 932
 1,329
 2,619
Other Income (Expense)(14,953) 8,712
 (41,048) (47,289)(15,703) 2,667
 (40,126) (53,162)
Net Interest Expense269,166
 
 (67,708) 201,458
298,125
 
 (16,444) 281,681
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes4,791,641
 286,436
 (82,762) 4,995,315
(1,505,808) 50,072
 (101,769) (1,557,505)
Income Tax Provision1,837,185
 98,559
 144,084
 2,079,828
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)(516,180) 64,281
 (8,920) (460,819)
Additions to Oil and Gas Properties, Excluding Dry Hole Costs7,133,727
 76,138
 261,312
 7,471,177
6,223,228
 75,407
 30,734
 6,329,369
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net28,391,741
 382,719
 398,184
 29,172,644
25,221,517
 274,850
 210,711
 25,707,078
Total Assets(5)32,867,310
 865,674
 1,025,615
 34,758,599
27,746,851
 889,253
 663,097
 29,299,201
 
(1)Other International primarily consists of EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(2)EOG had sales activity with two significant purchasers in 2018, one totaling $2.6 billion and the other totaling $2.3 billion of consolidated Operating Revenues and Other in the United States segment.
(3)EOG had sales activity with two significant purchasers in 2017, one totaling $1.5 billion and the other totaling $1.3 billion of consolidated Operating Revenues and Other in the United States segment.
(4)EOG had sales activity with three significant purchasers in 2016, one totaling $1.2 billion, one totaling $1.1 billion and one totaling $1.0 billion of consolidated Net Operating Revenues and Other in the United States segment.
(3)(5)EOG had sales activity with two significant purchasers in 2015, one totaling $1.7 billion andmade a reclassification of $160 million from deferred tax liabilities to deferred tax assets for the other totaling $1.4 billion of consolidated Net Operating Revenues inyear ended December 31, 2016, for the United States segment.segment and in total.
(4)EOG had sales activity with two significant purchasers in 2014, one totaling $4.0 billion and the other totaling $3.0 billion of consolidated Net Operating Revenues in the United States segment.





12.  Risk Management Activities

Commodity Price Risks. EOG engages in price risk management activities from time to time.  These activities are intended to manage EOG's exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas.  EOG utilizes financial commodity derivative instruments, primarily price swap, option, swaption, collar and basis swap contracts, as a means to manage this price risk. 

During 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, EOG elected not to designate any of its financial commodity derivative contracts as accounting hedges and, accordingly, accounted for these financial commodity derivative contracts using the mark-to-market accounting method.  Under this accounting method, changes in the fair value of outstanding financial instruments are recognized as gains or losses in the period of change and are recorded as Gains (Losses) on Mark-to-Market Commodity Derivative Contracts on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income.Income (Loss).  The related cash flow impact is reflected in Cash Flows from Operating Activities.  During 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, EOG recognized net gains (losses) on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts of $(100)$(166) million, $62$20 million and $834$(100) million, respectively, which included cash received from (payments for) settlements of crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts of $(22)$(259) million, $730$7 million and $34$(22) million, respectively.

Commodity Derivative Contracts. Prices received by EOG for its crude oil production generally vary from U.S. New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) West Texas Intermediate prices due to adjustments for delivery location (basis) and other factors. EOG has entered into crude oil basis swap contracts in order to fix the differential between pricing in Midland, Texas, and Cushing, Oklahoma (Midland Differential). Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's Midland Differential basis swap contracts for the year ended December 31, 2018. The weighted average price differential expressed in dollars per barrel ($/Bbl) represents the amount of reduction to Cushing, Oklahoma, prices for the notional volumes expressed in barrels per day (Bbld) covered by the basis swap contracts.

 Midland Differential Basis Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) 
Weighted Average Price Differential
($/Bbl)
 
 
 2018    
 January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (closed) 15,000
 $1.063
      
 2019    
 January 2019 (closed) 20,000
 $1.075
 February 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 20,000
 1.075

EOG has also entered into crude oil basis swap contracts in order to fix the differential between pricing in the U.S. Gulf Coast and Cushing, Oklahoma (Gulf Coast Differential). Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's Gulf Coast Differential basis swap contracts for the year ended December 31, 2018. The weighted average price differential expressed in $/Bbl represents the amount of addition to Cushing, Oklahoma, prices for the notional volumes expressed in Bbld covered by the basis swap contracts.

 Gulf Coast Differential Basis Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) 
Weighted Average Price Differential
($/Bbl)
 
 
 2018    
 January 1, 2018 through September 30, 2018 (closed) 37,000
 $3.818
 October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (closed) 52,000
 3.911
      
 2019    
 January 2019 (closed) 13,000
 $5.572
 February 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 13,000
 5.572


Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's crude oil price swap contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016, with notional volumes expressed in barrels per day (Bbld) and prices expressed in dollars per barrel ($/Bbl).

 Crude Oil Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) Weighted Average Price ($/Bbl)
 
 
 2016    
 April 12, 2016 through April 30, 2016 (closed) 90,000
 $42.30
 May 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 (closed) 128,000
 42.56
      
 2017    
 January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 35,000
 $50.04

EOG has entered into crude oil collar contracts, which establish ceiling and floor prices for the sale of notional volumes of crude oil as specified in the collar contracts. The collars require that EOG pay the difference between the ceiling price and the average NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil price for the contract month (Index Price) in the event the Index Price is above the ceiling price. The collars grant EOG the right to receive the difference between the floor price and the Index Price in the event the Index Price is below the floor price. Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's crude oil collar contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, with notional volumes expressed in Bbld and prices expressed in $/Bbl.

Crude Oil Collar Contracts
   Weighted Average Price ($/Bbl)
 Volume (Bbld) Ceiling Price Floor Price
2016     
September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (closed)70,000
 $54.25
 $45.00
 Crude Oil Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (Bbld) Weighted Average Price ($/Bbl)
 
 
 2018    
 January 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 (closed) 134,000
 $60.04


On November 20, 2018, EOG entered into crude oil price swap contracts for the period December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, with notional volumes of 134,000 Bbld at an average price of $53.75 per Bbl. These contracts offset the crude oil price swap contracts for the same time period with notional volumes of 134,000 Bbld at an average price of $60.04 per Bbl. The net cash EOG received for settling these contracts is $26.1 million. The offsetting contracts are excluded from the above table.

Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's natural gas price swap contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, with notional volumes expressed in million British thermal units (MMBtu) per day (MMBtud) and prices expressed in dollars per MMBtu ($/MMBtu).

 Natural Gas Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (MMBtud) Weighted Average Price ($/MMBtu)
 
 
 2016    
 March 1, 2016 through August 31, 2016 (closed) 60,000
 $2.49
      
 2017    
 March 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017 30,000
 $3.10
 Natural Gas Price Swap Contracts
   Volume (MMBtud) Weighted Average Price ($/MMBtu)
 
 
 2018    
 March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 (closed) 35,000
 $3.00

EOG has sold call options which establish a ceiling price for the sale of notional volumes of natural gas as specified in the call option contracts. The call options require that EOG pay the difference between the call option strike price and either the average or last business day NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price for the contract month (Henry Hub Index Price) in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is above the call option strike price.

In addition, EOG has purchased put options which establish a floor price for the sale of notional volumes of natural gas as specified in the put option contracts. The put options grant EOG the right to receive the difference between the put option strike price and the Henry Hub Index Price in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is below the put option strike price. Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's natural gas call and put option contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, with notional volumes expressed in MMBtud and prices expressed in $/MMBtu.

Natural Gas Option Contracts
 Call Options Sold Put Options Purchased
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
2016       
September 2016 (closed)56,250
 $3.46
 
 $
October 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016 (closed)106,250
 3.48
 
 
        
2017       
March 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017213,750
 $3.44
 171,000
 $2.92
        
2018       
March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018120,000
 $3.38
 96,000
 $2.94
Natural Gas Option Contracts
 Call Options Sold Put Options Purchased
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
 Volume (MMBtud) Weighted
Average Price
($/MMBtu)
2018       
March 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 (closed)120,000
 $3.38
 96,000
 $2.94



EOG has also entered into natural gas collar contracts, which establish ceiling and floor prices for the sale of notional volumes of natural gas as specified in the collar contracts. The collars require that EOG pay the difference between the ceiling price and the Henry Hub Index Price in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is above the ceiling price. The collars grant EOG the right to receive the difference between the floor price and the Henry Hub Index Price in the event the Henry Hub Index Price is below the floor price. Presented below is a comprehensive summary of EOG's natural gas collar contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016, with notional volumes expressed in MMBtud and prices expressed in $/MMbtu.

Natural Gas Collar Contracts
   Weighted Average Price ($/MMbtu)
 Volume (MMBtud) Ceiling Price Floor Price
2017     
March 1, 2017 through November 30, 201780,000
 $3.69
 $3.20
The following table sets forth the amounts and classification of EOG's outstanding derivative financial instruments at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.  Certain amounts may be presented on a net basis on the consolidated financial statements when such amounts are with the same counterparty and subject to a master netting arrangement (in millions):
    Fair Value at December 31,    Fair Value at December 31,
Description Location on Balance Sheet 2016 2015 Location on Balance Sheet 2018 2017
Asset Derivatives            
Crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts -            
Current portion Assets from Price Risk Management Activities $24
 $8
Noncurrent portion Other Assets $1
 $
 Other Assets 
 
Liability Derivatives    
  
    
  
Crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts -    
  
    
  
Current portion Liabilities from Price Risk Management Activities $62
 $
 
Liabilities from Price Risk Management Activities (1)
 $
 $50
Noncurrent portion Other Liabilities 
 7
(1)The current portion of Liabilities from Price Risk Management Activities consists of gross liabilities of $55 million, partially offset by gross assets of $5 million, at December 31, 2017.

Credit Risk.  Notional contract amounts are used to express the magnitude of a financial derivative.  The amounts potentially subject to credit risk, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties, are equal to the fair value of such contracts (see Note 13).  EOG evaluates its exposure to significant counterparties on an ongoing basis, including those arising from physical and financial transactions.  In some instances, EOG renegotiates payment terms and/or requires collateral, parent guarantees or letters of credit to minimize credit risk.  At December 31, 2016,2018, EOG's net accounts receivable balance related to United States Canada and United Kingdom hydrocarbon sales included three receivable balances, each of which accounted for more than 10% of the total balance.  The receivables were due from twothree petroleum refinery companies and one multinational oil and gas company.companies.  The related amounts were collected during early 2017.2019.  At December 31, 2015,2017, EOG's net accounts receivable balance related to United States, Canada and United Kingdom hydrocarbon sales included threetwo receivable balances, each of which accounted for more than 10% of the total balance.  The receivables were due from two petroleum refinery companies and one multinational oil and gas company.companies.  The related amounts were collected during early 2016.2018. In 20162018 and 2015,2017, all natural gas from EOG's Trinidad operations was sold to the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited and its subsidiary,subsidiary. In 2018, all crude oil and condensate from EOG's Trinidad operations was sold to the Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited and its successor, Heritage Petroleum Company Limited. In 2017, all crude oil and condensate from EOG's Trinidad operations was sold to the Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited; and in 2018 and 2017, all natural gas from EOG's China operations was sold to Petrochina Company Limited.

All of EOG's derivative instruments are covered by International Swap Dealers Association Master Agreements (ISDAs) with counterparties.  The ISDAs may contain provisions that require EOG, if it is the party in a net liability position, to post collateral when the amount of the net liability exceeds the threshold level specified for EOG's then-current credit ratings.  In addition, the ISDAs may also provide that as a result of certain circumstances, including certain events that cause EOG's credit ratings to become materially weaker than its then-current ratings, the counterparty may require all outstanding derivatives under the ISDA to be settled immediately.  See Note 13 for the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments that were in a net liability position at December 31, 2016.2017.  EOG had no collateral posted and held no collateral at December 31, 20162018 and 2015.


2017.

Substantially all of EOG's accounts receivable at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 resulted from hydrocarbon sales and/or joint interest billings to third-party companies, including foreign state-owned entities in the oil and gas industry.  This concentration of customers and joint interest owners may impact EOG's overall credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that these entities may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions.  In determining whether or not to require collateral or other credit enhancements from a customer or joint interest owner, EOG typically analyzes the entity's net worth, cash flows, earnings and credit ratings.  Receivables are generally not collateralized.  During the three-year period ended December 31, 2016,2018, credit losses incurred on receivables by EOG have been immaterial.



13.  Fair Value Measurements

Certain of EOG's financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are reported at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  An established fair value hierarchy prioritizes the relative reliability of inputs used in fair value measurements.  The hierarchy gives highest priority to Level 1 inputs that represent unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.  Level 2 inputs are directly or indirectly observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs and have the lowest priority in the hierarchy.  EOG gives consideration to the credit risk of its counterparties, as well as its own credit risk, when measuring financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

The following table provides fair value measurement information within the fair value hierarchy for certain of EOG's financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2016. There were no such amounts outstanding at December 31, 2015.2018 and 2017. Amounts shown in millions.
Fair Value Measurements Using:Fair Value Measurements Using:
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
At December 31, 2016 
  
  
  
At December 31, 2018       
Financial Assets: (1)
 
  
  
  
       
Crude Oil Basis Swaps$
 $24
 $
 $24
At December 31, 2017 
  
  
  
Financial Assets: (1)
 
  
  
  
Natural Gas Swaps$
 $2
 $
 $2
Natural Gas Options/Collars$
 $1
 $
 $1

 6
 
 6
Financial Liabilities: (2)
              
Crude Oil Swaps$
 $36
 $
 $36
$
 $38
 $
 $38
Natural Gas Swaps
 4
 
 4
Natural Gas Options/Collars
 22
 
 22
Crude Oil Basis Swaps
 19
 
 19
 
 
(1)At December 31, 2016, $1$24 million and $8 million is included in "Other Assets""Assets from Price Risk Management Activities" at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)At December 31, 2016, $62$50 million is included in "Current Liabilities - Liabilities from Price Risk Management Activities" at December 31, 2017 and $7 million is included in "Other Liabilities" at December 31, 2017, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The estimated fair value of crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts (including options/collars) was based upon forward commodity price curves based on quoted market prices.  Commodity derivative contracts were valued by utilizing an independent third-party derivative valuation provider who uses various types of valuation models, as applicable.

The initial measurement of asset retirement obligations at fair value is calculated using discounted cash flow techniques and based on internal estimates of future retirement costs associated with property, plant and equipment.  Significant Level 3 inputs used in the calculation of asset retirement obligations include plugging costs and reserve lives.  A reconciliation of EOG's asset retirement obligations is presented in Note 15.



During 2016,2018, proved oil and gas properties; other property, plant and equipment; and other assets with a carrying amount of $778$482 million were written down to their fair value of $587$308 million, resulting in pretax impairment charges of $191$174 million. Included in the $191$174 million pretax impairment charges were $61are $104 million of impairments of obsolete inventory.proved oil and gas properties for which EOG utilized an accepted offer from a third-party purchaser as the basis for determining fair value. In addition, EOG recorded pretax impairment charges in 20162018 of $138$49 million for firm commitment contracts related to divested Haynesville natural gasa commodity price-related write-down of other assets. During 2015,2017, proved oil and gas properties; other property, plant and equipment; and other assets with a carrying amount of $9,154$640 million were written down to their fair value of $2,828$372 million, resulting in pretax impairment charges of $6,326 million, $4,141 million net of tax. Impairments in 2015 included domestic legacy natural gas assets and marginal liquids plays and the Conwy crude oil project$268 million. Included in the East Irish Sea.$268 million pretax impairment charges are $217 million of impairments of proved oil and gas properties for which EOG utilized an accepted offer from a third-party purchaser as the basis for determining fair value. In addition, EOG recorded pretax impairment charges in 2017 of $28 million for a commodity price-related write-down of other assets. Significant Level 3 inputs associated with the calculation of discounted cash flows used in the impairment analysis include EOG's estimate of future crude oil and natural gas prices, production costs, development expenditures, anticipated production of proved reserves, appropriate risk-adjusted discount rates and other relevant data. In certain instances,



EOG utilized accepted offersaverage prices per acre from third-party purchaserscomparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value.value of unproved and proved properties, respectively, received in non-cash property exchanges. See Note 10.

Fair Value of Debt. At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, EOG had outstanding $6,990$6,040 million and $6,390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, which had estimated fair values of approximately $7,190$6,027 million and $6,524$6,602 million, respectively.  The estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and, where such prices were not available, other observable (Level 2) inputs regarding interest rates available to EOG at year-end.

14.  Accounting for Certain Long-Lived Assets

EOG reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation, depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset.  The carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the Income Approach described in the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the ASC. In certain instances, EOG utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value.

During 2016,2018, proved oil and gas properties; other property, plant and equipment; and other assetsproperties with a carrying amount of $667$139 million were written down to their fair value of $537$18 million, resulting in pretax impairment charges of $130$121 million. During 2015,2017, proved oil and gas properties and other assets with a carrying amount of $9,154$370 million were written down to their fair value of $2,828$146 million, resulting in pretax impairment charges of $6,326 million, $4,141 million net of tax.$224 million. Impairments in 20162018, 2017 and 20152016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets. In addition, impairments in 2015 included marginal liquids plays and the Conwy crude oil project in the East Irish Sea. Amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs, including amortization of capitalized interest, were $173 million, $211 million and $291 million $288 millionduring 2018, 2017 and $168 million during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

15.  Asset Retirement Obligations

The following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 (in thousands):
2016 20152018 2017
      
Carrying Amount at Beginning of Period$811,554
 $752,718
$946,848
 $912,926
Liabilities Incurred (1)
212,739
 63,844
79,057
 54,764
Liabilities Settled (2)(1)
(94,800) (17,415)(70,829) (61,871)
Accretion32,306
 31,956
36,622
 34,708
Revisions(38,286) (13,356)(38,932) (9,818)
Foreign Currency Translations(10,587) (6,193)1,611
 16,139
Carrying Amount at End of Period$912,926
 $811,554
$954,377
 $946,848
      
Current Portion$18,516
 $7,651
$26,214
 $19,259
Noncurrent Portion$894,410
 $803,903
$928,163
 $927,589
 
(1)Includes $164 million related to Yates transaction (see Note 17).
(2)Includes settlements related to asset sales.



The current and noncurrent portions of EOG's asset retirement obligations are included in Current Liabilities - Other and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.



16.  Exploratory Well Costs

EOG's net changes in capitalized exploratory well costs for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 are presented below (in thousands):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Balance at January 1$8,955
 $17,253
 $9,211
$2,167
 $
 $8,955
Additions Pending the Determination of Proved Reserves6,688
 24,640
 32,080
10,304
 27,487
 6,688
Reclassifications to Proved Properties(5,274) (26,659) (15,946)(7,917) (20,802) (5,274)
Costs Charged to Expense (1)
(10,369) (6,279) (8,092)(433) (4,518) (10,369)
Balance at December 31$
 $8,955
 $17,253
$4,121
 $2,167
 $
 
(1)Includes capitalized exploratory well costs charged to either dry hole costs or impairments.

At December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, all exploratory well costs had been capitalized for periods of less than one year.

17.  Acquisitions and Divestitures

During 2018, EOG recognized a net gain on asset dispositions of $175 million primarily due to non-cash property exchanges in Texas, New Mexico and Wyoming. Additionally, EOG received proceeds in 2018 of approximately $227 million primarily due to the sale of its United Kingdom operations in the fourth quarter of 2018.

During 2017, EOG recognized a net loss on asset dispositions of $(99) million and received proceeds of approximately $227 million primarily from sales of producing properties, other assets and acreage in Texas and Oklahoma. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2017, EOG signed a purchase and sale agreement and an exchange agreement for the sale and exchange, respectively, of primarily producing properties in the Rocky Mountain area. At December 31, 2017, the book value of the assets classified as held for sale and the related asset retirement obligations were $188 million and $41 million, respectively.

During 2017, EOG completed acquisitions of approximately $73 million to acquire producing properties in various areas in the United States.

During 2016, EOG recognized a net gain on asset dispositions of $206 million and received proceeds of approximately $1,119 million primarily from sales of producing properties and acreage in Texas, Louisiana, the Rocky Mountain area and Oklahoma. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2016, EOG completed the sale of all its Argentina assets.

Yates Entities. On October 4, 2016, EOG completed its previously announced mergers and related asset purchase transactions with Yates Petroleum Corporation (YPC), Abo Petroleum Corporation (ABO), MYCO Industries, Inc. (MYCO) and certain affiliated entities (collectively with YPC, ABO and MYCO, the Yates Entities). SubjectPursuant to the terms of the agreements,these transactions, EOG issued to the shareholders of YPC, ABO and MYCO and to certain of the sellers under the related asset purchase transactions an aggregate of approximately 25 million shares of EOG common stock and paid to certain of the sellers under the asset purchase transactions an aggregate of approximately $16 million in cash for total consideration transferred of approximately $2.4 billion. In addition, under the terms of the transactions, EOG assumed and repaid approximately $164 million of debt owed by the Yates Entities, which was offset by approximately $70 million of cash of the Yates Entities.

The assets of the Yates Entities include producing wells in addition to acreage in the Delaware Basin Core, the Powder River Basin, the Permian Basin Northwest Shelf and other Western basins.

Revenues and Operating Income of $71 million and $8 million, respectively, of the Yates Entities were included in EOG's Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income beginning October 4, 2016. In connection with these mergers and related asset purchase transactions, EOG incurred acquisition-related costs in 2016 of approximately $5 million, all of which were expensed and recorded as General and Administrative on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income.Income (Loss).



EOG accounted for the mergers with YPC, ABO and MYCO and the related asset purchase transactions as a business combination under the acquisition method with EOG as the acquirer. Under the acquisition method, the consideration transferred is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, with any excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired recorded as goodwill. EOG did not record goodwill in connection with these transactions.

Certain data necessary to complete the purchase price allocation is preliminary, and includes, but is not limited to, the final valuations of oil and gas properties, the valuation of off-market transportation contracts and the calculation of deferred taxes based upon the underlying tax basis of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. EOG believes the estimates used are reasonable but are subject to change as additional information becomes available.


The following table represents the preliminaryfinal allocation of the total purchase price of the Yates Entities (in thousands).

Current Assets  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$70,411
$70,411
Accounts Receivable, Net83,540
77,073
Inventories10,955
10,955
Other10,640
10,640
Total175,546
169,079
  
Property, Plant and Equipment  
Oil and Gas Properties (Successful Efforts Method)3,850,100
3,815,207
Other Property, Plant and Equipment16,586
21,824
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net3,866,686
3,837,031
Other Assets22,706
22,706
Total Assets$4,064,938
$4,028,816
  
Current Liabilities  
Accounts Payable$126,988
$124,145
Accrued Taxes Payable23,520
22,417
Other743
743
Total151,251
147,305
  
Long-Term Debt163,829
163,829
Asset Retirement Obligations163,144
163,144
Off-Market Transportation Contracts39,720
39,720
Other Liabilities28,645
28,645
Deferred Income Taxes1,104,581
1,072,405
Total Liabilities$1,651,170
$1,615,048
Total Consideration Transferred$2,413,768
$2,413,768

The fair value measurements of Oil and Gas Properties and Asset Retirement Obligations are based on inputs that are not observable in the market and therefore represent Level 3 inputs. The fair values of Proved Oil and Gas Properties were measured using the income approach. Significant inputs to the valuation of Proved Oil and Gas Properties included EOG's estimate of future crude oil and natural gas prices, production costs, development expenditures, anticipated production of proved reserves, appropriate risk-adjusted discount rates and other relevant data. Significant inputs to the valuation of Unproved Oil and Gas Properties included average prices per acre of comparable market transactions.

These inputs required significant judgments, assumptions and estimates by management at the time of the valuation and are the most sensitive and may be subject to change.

Other. During 2016, EOG recognized a net gain on asset dispositions of $206 million and received proceeds of approximately $1,119 million primarily from sales of producing properties and acreage in Texas, Louisiana, the Rocky Mountain area and Oklahoma. Additionally during the third quarter of 2016, EOG completed the sale of all its Argentina assets.

During 2015, EOG completed acquisitions of approximately $481 million primarily to acquire proved crude oil properties and related assets in the Delaware Basin and gathering assets in the North Dakota Bakken.



During 2015, EOG recognized a net loss on asset dispositions of $(9) million and received proceeds of approximately $193 million primarily from sales of gathering and processing assets and other assets. During 2014, EOG recognized a net gain on asset dispositions of $508 million and received proceeds of approximately $569 million primarily from the divestiture of all its assets in Manitoba and the majority of its assets in Alberta (collectively, the Canadian Sales) and from sales of producing properties and acreage in the Upper Gulf Coast region, the Rocky Mountain area and the Mid-Continent area. The Canadian Sales that closed on or about December 1, 2014, occurred in two separate transactions, an asset sale and the sale of the stock of certain of EOG's Canadian subsidiaries. As these two transactions represented a substantially complete liquidation of EOG's Canadian operations, approximately $383 million of cumulative translation adjustments previously recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was reclassified to the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The Canadian Sales also resulted in the release of approximately $150 million of restricted cash related to future abandonment liabilities.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data Unless Otherwise Indicated)
(Unaudited)


Oil and Gas Producing Activities

The following disclosures are made in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-03 "Oil and Gas Reserve Estimates and Disclosures" and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) final rule on "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting." During the fourth quarter of 2014, EOG completed the sale of substantially all of its Canadian operations. As a result, information relating to EOG's remaining Canadian operations has been included in the Other International segment and prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Oil and Gas Reserves. Users of this information should be aware that the process of estimating quantities of "proved," "proved developed" and "proved undeveloped" crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and natural gas reserves is complex, requiring significant subjective decisions in the evaluation of all available geological, engineering and economic data for each reservoir.  The data for a given reservoir may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, additional development activity; evolving production history; crude oil and condensate, NGL and natural gas prices; and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions.  Consequently, material revisions (upward or downward) to existing reserve estimates may occur from time to time.  Although reasonable effort is made to ensure that reserve estimates reported represent the most accurate assessments possible, the significance of the subjective decisions required and variances in available data for various reservoirs make these estimates generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.  SeeFor related discussion, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors.

Proved reserves represent estimated quantities of crude oil, NGLs and natural gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated, with reasonable certainty, to be economically producible from a given date forward from known reservoirs under then-existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations before the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation.

Proved developed reserves are proved reserves expected to be recovered under operating methods being utilized at the time the estimates were made, through wells and equipment in place or if the cost of any required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well.

Proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage are limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances. PUDs can be recorded in respect of a particular undrilled location only if the location is scheduled, under the then-current drilling and development plan, to be drilled within five years from the date that the PUDs are to bewere recorded, unless specific factors (such as those described in interpretative guidance issued by the Staff of the SEC) justify a longer timeframe.  Likewise, absent any such specific factors, PUDs associated with a particular undeveloped drilling location shall be removed from the estimates of proved reserves if the location is scheduled, under the then-current drilling and development plan, to be drilled on a date that is beyond five years from the date that the PUDs were recorded.  EOG has formulated development plans for all drilling locations associated with its PUDs at December 31, 2016.2018.  Under these plans, each PUD location will be drilled within five years from the date it was recorded.  Estimates for PUDs are not attributed to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

In making estimates of PUDs, EOG's technical staff, including engineers and geoscientists, perform detailed technical analysis of each potential drilling location within its inventory of prospects.  In making a determination as to which of these locations would penetrate undrilled portions of the formation that can be judged, with reasonable certainty, to be continuous and contain economically producible crude oil and natural gas, studies are conducted using numerous data elements and analysis techniques.  EOG's technical staff estimates the hydrocarbons in place, by mapping the entirety of the play in question using seismic techniques, typically employing two-dimensional and three-dimensional data.  This analysis is integrated with other static data, including, but not limited to, core analysis, mechanical properties of the formation, thermal maturity indicators, and well logs of existing penetrations.  Highly specialized equipment is utilized to prepare rock samples in assessing microstructures which contribute to porosity and permeability.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Analysis of dynamic data is then incorporated to arrive at the estimated fractional recovery of hydrocarbons in place.  Data analysis techniques employed include, but are not limited to, well testing analysis, static bottom hole pressure analysis, flowing bottom hole pressure analysis, analysis of historical production trends, pressure transient analysis and rate transient analysis.  Application of proprietary rate transient analysis techniques in low permeability rocks allow for quantification of estimates of contribution to production from both fractures and rock matrix.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The impact of optimal completion techniques is a key factor in determining if the PUDs reflected in prospective locations are reasonably certain of being economically producible.  EOG's technical staff estimates the recovery improvement that might be achieved when completing horizontal wells with multi-stage fracture stimulation.  In the early stages of development of a play, EOG determines the optimal length of the horizontal lateral and multi-stage fracture stimulation using the aforementioned analysis techniques along with pilot drilling programs and gathering of microseismic data.

The process of analyzing static and dynamic data, well completion optimization and the results of early development activities provides the appropriate level of certainty as well as support for the economic producibility of the plays in which PUDs are reflected.  EOG has found this approach to be effective based on successful application in analogous reservoirs in low permeability resource plays.

Certain of EOG's Trinidad reserves are held under production sharing contracts where EOG's interest varies with prices and production volumes.  Trinidad reserves, as presented on a net basis, assume prices in existence at the time the estimates were made and EOG's estimate of future production volumes.  Future fluctuations in prices, production rates or changes in political or regulatory environments could cause EOG's share of future production from Trinidadian reserves to be materially different from that presented.

Estimates of proved reserves at December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 were based on studies performed by the engineering staff of EOG.  The Engineering and Acquisitions Department is directly responsible for EOG's reserve evaluation process and consists of 16 professionals, all of whom hold, at a minimum, bachelor's degrees in engineering, and fivefour of whom are Registered Professional Engineers.  The Vice President, Engineering and Acquisitions is the manager of this department and is the primary technical person responsible for this process.  The Vice President, Engineering and Acquisitions holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering, has 3032 years of experience in reserve evaluations and is a Registered Professional Engineer.

EOG's reserves estimation process is a collaborative effort coordinated by the Engineering and Acquisitions Department in compliance with EOG's internal controls for such process.  Reserve information as well as models used to estimate such reserves are stored on secured databases.  Non-technical inputs used in reserve estimation models, including crude oil, NGL and natural gas prices, production costs, transportation costs, future capital expenditures and EOG's net ownership percentages, are obtained from other departments within EOG.  EOG's Internal Audit Department conducts testing with respect to such non-technical inputs.  Additionally, EOG engages DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M), independent petroleum consultants, to perform independent reserves evaluation of select EOG properties comprising not less than 75% of EOG's estimates of proved reserves.  EOG's Board of Directors requires that D&M's and EOG's reserve quantities for the properties evaluated by D&M vary by no more than 5% in the aggregate.  Once completed, EOG's year-end reserves are presented to senior management, including the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; the President and Chief Operating Officer; the Executive Vice Presidents, Exploration and Production; and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, for approval.

Opinions by D&M for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 covered producing areas containing 83%79%, 86%79% and 76%83%, respectively, of proved reserves of EOG on a net-equivalent-barrel-of-oil basis.  D&M's opinions indicate that the estimates of proved reserves prepared by EOG's Engineering and Acquisitions Department for the properties reviewed by D&M, when compared in total on a net-equivalent-barrel-of-oil basis, do not differ materially from the estimates prepared by D&M.  SuchSpecifically, such estimates by D&M in the aggregate varied by not more than 5% from those prepared by the Engineering and Acquisitions Department of EOG.  All reports by D&M were developed utilizing geological and engineering data provided by EOG.  The report of D&M dated January 30, 2017,25, 2019, which contains further discussion of the reserve estimates and evaluations prepared by D&M, as well as the qualifications of D&M's technical person primarily responsible for overseeing such estimates and evaluations, is attached as Exhibit 23.299.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.

No major discovery or other favorable or adverse event subsequent to December 31, 2016,2018, is believed to have caused a material change in the estimates of net proved reserves as of that date.

The following tables set forth EOG's net proved reserves at December 31 for each of the four years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2018, and the changes in the net proved reserves for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2018, as estimated by the Engineering and Acquisitions Department of EOG:
EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NET PROVED RESERVE SUMMARY
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
NET PROVED RESERVES              
              
Crude Oil (MBbl) (2)
              
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2013880,049
 1,590
 18,901
 900,540
Revisions of previous estimates28,301
 99
 (378) 28,022
Purchases in place9,705
 
 
 9,705
Extensions, discoveries and other additions319,540
 
 14
 319,554
Sales in place(4,967) 
 (7,656) (12,623)
Production(102,946) (350) (2,152) (105,448)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20141,129,682
 1,339
 8,729
 1,139,750
Revisions of previous estimates(114,924) (1) 
 (114,925)
Purchases in place35,922
 
 
 35,922
Extensions, discoveries and other additions141,310
 63
 13
 141,386
Sales in place(730) 
 (10) (740)
Production(103,400) (332) (65) (103,797)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20151,087,860
 1,069
 8,667
 1,097,596
1,087,860
 1,069
 8,667
 1,097,596
Revisions of previous estimates42,040
 54
 861
 42,955
42,040
 54
 861
 42,955
Purchases in place25,795
 
 
 25,795
25,795
 
 
 25,795
Extensions, discoveries and other additions123,441
 
 
 123,441
123,441
 
 
 123,441
Sales in place(8,791) 
 
 (8,791)(8,791) 
 
 (8,791)
Production(101,854) (284) (1,273) (103,411)(101,854) (284) (1,273) (103,411)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20161,168,491
 839
 8,255
 1,177,585
1,168,491
 839
 8,255
 1,177,585
       
Natural Gas Liquids (MBbl) (2)
 
  
  
  
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2013376,002
 
 1,204
 377,206
Revisions of previous estimates27,450
 
 (7) 27,443
57,935
 80
 (179) 57,836
Purchases in place1,812
 
 
 1,812
1,111
 
 
 1,111
Extensions, discoveries and other additions91,683
 
 
 91,683
207,137
 301
 119
 207,557
Sales in place(956) 
 (823) (1,779)(8,393) 
 
 (8,393)
Production(29,061) 
 (236) (29,297)(122,210) (322) (191) (122,723)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2014466,930
 
 138
 467,068
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20171,304,071
 898
 8,004
 1,312,973
Revisions of previous estimates(113,290) 
 68
 (113,222)(13,237) (183) 44
 (13,376)
Purchases in place8,251
 
 
 8,251
2,743
 
 
 2,743
Extensions, discoveries and other additions49,147
 
 
 49,147
383,003
 
 15
 383,018
Sales in place(84) 
 (187) (271)(768) 
 (6,310) (7,078)
Production(28,079) 
 (19) (28,098)(144,128) (298) (1,542) (145,968)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20181,531,684
 417
 211
 1,532,312
       
Natural Gas Liquids (MBbl) (2)
 
  
  
  
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2015382,875
 
 
 382,875
382,875
 
 
 382,875
Revisions of previous estimates53,771
 
 
 53,771
53,771
 
 
 53,771
Purchases in place1,284
 
 
 1,284
1,284
 
 
 1,284
Extensions, discoveries and other additions41,862
 
 
 41,862
41,862
 
 
 41,862
Sales in place(33,548) 
 
 (33,548)(33,548) 
 
 (33,548)
Production(29,878) 
 
 (29,878)(29,878) 
 
 (29,878)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2016416,366
 
 
 416,366
416,366
 
 
 416,366
Revisions of previous estimates46,843
 
 
 46,843
Purchases in place421
 
 
 421
Extensions, discoveries and other additions75,003
 
 
 75,003
Sales in place(2,887) 
 
 (2,887)
Production(32,273) 
 
 (32,273)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2017503,473
 
 
 503,473
Revisions of previous estimates23,942
 
 
 23,942
Purchases in place2,006
 
 
 2,006
Extensions, discoveries and other additions127,409
 
 
 127,409
Sales in place(41) 
 
 (41)
Production(42,460) 
 
 (42,460)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2018614,329
 
 
 614,329
EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
Natural Gas (Bcf) (3)
              
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20134,398.7
 520.7
 125.4
 5,044.8
Revisions of previous estimates252.2
 12.9
 5.5
 270.6
Purchases in place17.1
 
 
 17.1
Extensions, discoveries and other additions638.3
 4.5
 4.7
 647.5
Sales in place(52.4) 
 (78.7) (131.1)
Production(348.4) (132.5) (25.4) (506.3)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20144,905.5
 405.6
 31.5
 5,342.6
Revisions of previous estimates(1,453.1) 16.8
 5.6
 (1,430.7)
Purchases in place72.3
 
 
 72.3
Extensions, discoveries and other additions306.3
 21.7
 4.4
 332.4
Sales in place(3.9) 
 (11.1) (15.0)
Production(337.3) (127.5) (10.9) (475.7)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20153,489.8
 316.6
 19.5
 3,825.9
3,489.8
 316.6
 19.5
 3,825.9
Revisions of previous estimates298.4
 29.5
 5.2
 333.1
298.4
 29.5
 5.2
 333.1
Purchases in place91.5
 
 
 91.5
91.5
 
 
 91.5
Extensions, discoveries and other additions202.1
 59.9
 
 262.0
202.1
 59.9
 
 262.0
Sales in place(752.0) 
 
 (752.0)(752.0) 
 
 (752.0)
Production(308.6) (125.1) (8.9) (442.6)(308.6) (125.1) (8.9) (442.6)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20163,021.2
 280.9
 15.8
 3,317.9
3,021.2
 280.9
 15.8
 3,317.9
       
Oil Equivalents (MBoe) (2)
 
  
  
  
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20131,989,166
 88,364
 41,013
 2,118,543
Revisions of previous estimates97,782
 2,245
 541
 100,568
602.8
 (27.4) 8.6
 584.0
Purchases in place14,367
 
 
 14,367
4.8
 
 
 4.8
Extensions, discoveries and other additions517,613
 758
 796
 519,167
619.3
 174.2
 35.9
 829.4
Sales in place(14,661) 
 (21,602) (36,263)(56.4) 
 
 (56.4)
Production(190,065) (22,430) (6,631) (219,126)(293.2) (114.3) (9.1) (416.6)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20142,414,202
 68,937
 14,117
 2,497,256
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20173,898.5
 313.4
 51.2
 4,263.1
Revisions of previous estimates(470,401) 2,802
 995
 (466,604)(127.2) 20.7
 15.0
 (91.5)
Purchases in place56,215
 
 
 56,215
41.3
 
 
 41.3
Extensions, discoveries and other additions241,513
 3,682
 736
 245,931
951.4
 
 4.6
 956.0
Sales in place(1,467) 
 (2,039) (3,506)(22.2) 
 
 (22.2)
Production(187,701) (21,578) (1,896) (211,175)(351.2) (97.1) (11.2) (459.5)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20184,390.6
 237.0
 59.6
 4,687.2
       
Oil Equivalents (MBoe) (2)
 
  
  
  
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20152,052,361
 53,843
 11,913
 2,118,117
2,052,361
 53,843
 11,913
 2,118,117
Revisions of previous estimates145,542
 4,978
 1,722
 152,242
145,542
 4,978
 1,722
 152,242
Purchases in place42,330
 
 
 42,330
42,330
 
 
 42,330
Extensions, discoveries and other additions198,973
 9,990
 
 208,963
198,973
 9,990
 
 208,963
Sales in place(167,669) 
 
 (167,669)(167,669) 
 
 (167,669)
Production(183,145) (21,150) (2,755) (207,050)(183,145) (21,150) (2,755) (207,050)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20162,088,392
 47,661
 10,880
 2,146,933
2,088,392
 47,661
 10,880
 2,146,933
Revisions of previous estimates205,262
 (4,493) 1,249
 202,018
Purchases in place2,332
 
 
 2,332
Extensions, discoveries and other additions385,354
 29,340
 6,104
 420,798
Sales in place(20,687) 
 
 (20,687)
Production(203,351) (19,366) (1,707) (224,424)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20172,457,302
 53,142
 16,526
 2,526,970
Revisions of previous estimates(10,500) 3,272
 2,544
 (4,684)
Purchases in place11,640
 
 
 11,640
Extensions, discoveries and other additions668,972
 
 778
 669,750
Sales in place(4,509) 
 (6,310) (10,819)
Production(245,127) (16,478) (3,406) (265,011)
Net proved reserves at December 31, 20182,877,778
 39,936
 10,132
 2,927,846
 
(1)Other International includes EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(2)Thousand barrels or thousand barrels of oil equivalent, as applicable; oil equivalents include crude oil and condensate, NGLs and natural gas. Oil equivalents are determined using a ratio of 1.0 barrel of crude oil and condensate or NGLs to 6.0 thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
(3)Billion cubic feet.
EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


During 2016,2018, EOG added 209670 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBoe) of proved reserves from drilling activities and technical evaluation of major proved areas, primarily in the Permian Basin, the Eagle Ford, the Rocky Mountain area and the Mid-Continent area.  Approximately 76% of the 2018 reserve additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs, and substantially all were in the United States.  Sales in place of 11 MMBoe were primarily related to the sale of the United Kingdom operations and the sale or exchange of other producing assets. Revisions of previous estimates of negative 5 MMBoe for 2018 included an upward revision of 35 MMBoe primarily due to increases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2018, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate. The primary areas affected were in the Rocky Mountain area, the Eagle Ford and the Permian Basin. Downward revisions other than price of 40 MMBoe resulted primarily from changes in production forecasts and higher production costs. Purchases in place of 12 MMBoe were primarily related to the South Texas Area.

During 2017, EOG added 421 MMBoe of proved reserves from drilling activities and technical evaluation of major proved areas, primarily in the Permian Basin, the Eagle Ford, the Rocky Mountain area and Trinidad.  Approximately 67% of the 2017 reserve additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs, and 92% were in the United States.  Sales in place of 21 MMBoe were primarily related to the sale or exchange of certain producing assets. Revisions of previous estimates of 202 MMBoe for 2017 included an upward revision of 154 MMBoe primarily due to increases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2017, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate. The primary plays affected were in the Rocky Mountain area, the Eagle Ford and the Permian Basin. Positive revisions other than price of 48 MMBoe resulted primarily from improved well performance in the Permian Basin and lower production costs. Purchases in place of 2 MMBoe were primarily related to the Permian Basin.

During 2016, EOG added 209 MMBoe of proved reserves from drilling activities and technical evaluation of major proved areas, primarily in the Permian Basin, the Rocky Mountain area and the Eagle Ford.  Approximately 79% of the 2016 reserve additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs, and 95% were in the United States.  Sales in place of 168 MMBoe were primarily related to the disposition of certain producing natural gas assets in the Barnett Shale and Haynesville plays and marginal liquids plays in the Permian Basin and Rocky Mountain area. Revisions of previous estimates of 152 MMBoe for 2016 included a downward revision of 101 MMBoe primarily due to decreases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2016, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate. The primary plays affected were the Eagle Ford, the Uinta basin in the Rocky Mountain area, the Permian Basin and the Barnett Shale. Positive revisions other than price of 253 MMBoe resulted primarily from lower production costs and improved performance in the Delaware Basin. Purchases in place of 42 MMBoe were primarily related to the Yates transaction.

During 2015, EOG added 246 MMBoe of proved reserves from drilling activities and technical evaluation of major proved areas, primarily in the Permian Basin, the Rocky Mountain area and the Eagle Ford.  Approximately 77% of the 2015 reserve additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs, and 98% were in the United States.  Sales in place of 4 MMBoe were primarily related to the disposition of certain producing natural gas assets in Canada, the Permian Basin and the Upper Gulf Coast. Negative revisions of previous estimates of 467 MMBoe for 2015 included a negative revision of 574 MMBoe primarily due to decreases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2015, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate. The primary plays affected were the Uinta and Green River basins in the Rocky Mountain area, the Permian Basin and the Barnett Shale. Revisions other than price resulted primarily from improved recovery in the Eagle Ford.

During 2014, EOG added 519 MMBoe of proved reserves from drilling activities and technical evaluation of major proved areas, primarily in the Eagle Ford, Permian Basin and the Rocky Mountain area.  Approximately 79% of the 2014 reserve additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs, and nearly 100% were in the United States.  Sales in place of 36 MMBoe were primarily related to the disposition of certain producing natural gas assets in Canada, the Upper Gulf Coast and other producing basins in the United States. Positive revisions of previous estimates of 101 MMBoe for 2014 included a positive revision of 52 MMBoe primarily due to an increase in the average natural gas price used in the December 31, 2014 reserves estimation as compared to the price used in the prior year estimate. The primary plays affected were the Barnett Shale, the Uinta and Green River basins in the Rocky Mountain area and the Haynesville Shale play. Revisions other than price resulted primarily from improved recovery in the Eagle Ford and improved recoveries and reduced operating costs in the Permian Basin.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
NET PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES              
Crude Oil (MBbl)              
December 31, 2013382,517
 1,505
 7,034
 391,056
December 31, 2014493,694
 1,339
 115
 495,148
December 31, 2015444,070
 1,069
 63
 445,202
444,070
 1,069
 63
 445,202
December 31, 2016507,531
 839
 8,255
 516,625
507,531
 839
 8,255
 516,625
December 31, 2017605,405
 898
 7,933
 614,236
December 31, 2018712,218
 417
 150
 712,785
Natural Gas Liquids (MBbl) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 2013199,964
 
 896
 200,860
December 31, 2014264,611
 
 138
 264,749
December 31, 2015205,898
 
 
 205,898
205,898
 
 
 205,898
December 31, 2016230,219
 
 
 230,219
230,219
 
 
 230,219
December 31, 2017286,872
 
 
 286,872
December 31, 2018341,386
 
 
 341,386
Natural Gas (Bcf) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 20132,597.3
 494.6
 121.5
 3,213.4
December 31, 20143,102.8
 396.9
 28.6
 3,528.3
December 31, 20152,211.2
 297.6
 19.5
 2,528.3
2,211.2
 297.6
 19.5
 2,528.3
December 31, 20161,804.4
 262.2
 15.8
 2,082.4
1,804.4
 262.2
 15.8
 2,082.4
December 31, 20172,450.8
 299.2
 29.3
 2,779.3
December 31, 20182,699.0
 223.9
 40.9
 2,963.8
Oil Equivalents (MBoe) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 20131,015,359
 83,933
 28,184
 1,127,476
December 31, 20141,275,447
 67,484
 5,016
 1,347,947
December 31, 20151,018,491
 50,677
 3,309
 1,072,477
1,018,491
 50,677
 3,309
 1,072,477
December 31, 20161,038,483
 44,543
 10,880
 1,093,906
1,038,483
 44,543
 10,880
 1,093,906
December 31, 20171,300,758
 50,779
 12,798
 1,364,335
December 31, 20181,503,441
 37,746
 6,950
 1,548,137
NET PROVED UNDEVELOPED RESERVES 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Crude Oil (MBbl) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 2013497,532
 85
 11,867
 509,484
December 31, 2014635,988
 
 8,614
 644,602
December 31, 2015643,790
 
 8,604
 652,394
643,790
 
 8,604
 652,394
December 31, 2016660,960
 
 
 660,960
660,690
 
 
 660,690
December 31, 2017698,666
 
 71
 698,737
December 31, 2018819,466
 
 61
 819,527
Natural Gas Liquids (MBbl) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 2013176,038
 
 308
 176,346
December 31, 2014202,319
 
 
 202,319
December 31, 2015176,977
 
 
 176,977
176,977
 
 
 176,977
December 31, 2016186,147
 
 
 186,147
186,147
 
 
 186,147
December 31, 2017216,601
 
 
 216,601
December 31, 2018272,943
 
 
 272,943
Natural Gas (Bcf) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 20131,801.4
 26.1
 3.9
 1,831.4
December 31, 20141,802.7
 8.7
 2.9
 1,814.3
December 31, 20151,278.6
 19.0
 
 1,297.6
1,278.6
 19.0
 
 1,297.6
December 31, 20161,216.8
 18.7
 
 1,235.5
1,216.8
 18.7
 
 1,235.5
December 31, 20171,447.7
 14.2
 21.9
 1,483.8
December 31, 20181,691.6
 13.1
 18.7
 1,723.4
Oil Equivalents (MBoe) 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
December 31, 2013973,807
 4,431
 12,829
 991,067
December 31, 20141,138,755
 1,453
 9,101
 1,149,309
December 31, 20151,033,870
 3,166
 8,604
 1,045,640
1,033,870
 3,166
 8,604
 1,045,640
December 31, 20161,049,909
 3,118
 
 1,053,027
1,049,909
 3,118
 
 1,053,027
December 31, 20171,156,544
 2,363
 3,728
 1,162,635
December 31, 20181,374,337
 2,190
 3,182
 1,379,709
 
(1)Other International includes EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Net Proved Undeveloped Reserves. The following table presents the changes in EOG's total proved undeveloped reserves during 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in MBoe):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
          
Balance at January 11,045,640
 1,149,309
 991,067
1,162,635
 1,053,027
 1,045,640
Extensions and Discoveries138,101
 205,152
 403,713
490,725
 237,378
 138,101
Revisions64,413
 (241,973) (79,630)(8,244) 33,127
 64,413
Acquisition of Reserves
 54,458
 4,239
311
 
 
Sale of Reserves(45,917) 
 (10,176)
 (8,253) (45,917)
Conversion to Proved Developed Reserves(149,210) (121,306) (159,904)(265,718) (152,644) (149,210)
Balance at December 311,053,027
 1,045,640
 1,149,309
1,379,709
 1,162,635
 1,053,027

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018, total PUDs increased by 217 MMBoe to 1,380 MMBoe.  EOG added approximately 31 MMBoe of PUDs through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion.  Based on the technology employed by EOG to identify and record PUDs (see discussion of technology employed on pages F-36 and F-37 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), EOG added 460 MMBoe.  The PUD additions were primarily in the Permian Basin, Anadarko Basin, the Eagle Ford and, to a lesser extent, the Rocky Mountain area, and 80% of the additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs.  During 2018, EOG drilled and transferred 266 MMBoe of PUDs to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $2,745 million.  All PUDs, including drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs), are scheduled for completion within five years of the original reserve booking.

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2017, total PUDs increased by 110 MMBoe to 1,163 MMBoe.  EOG added approximately 38 MMBoe of PUDs through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion.  Based on the technology employed by EOG to identify and record PUDs, EOG added 199 MMBoe.  The PUD additions were primarily in the Permian Basin and, to a lesser extent, the Eagle Ford and the Rocky Mountain area, and 74% of the additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs.  During 2017, EOG drilled and transferred 153 MMBoe of PUDs to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $1,440 million.  Revisions of PUDs totaled positive 33 MMBoe, primarily due to updated type curves resulting from improved performance of offsetting wells in the Permian Basin, the impact of increases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2017, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate, and lower costs.  During 2017, EOG sold or exchanged 8 MMBoe of PUDs primarily in the Permian Basin.

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016, total PUDs increased by 7 MMBoe to 1,053 MMBoe.  EOG added approximately 21 MMBoe of PUDs through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion.  Based on the technology employed by EOG to identify and record PUDs, (see discussion of technology employed on pages F-35 and F-36 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), EOG added 117 MMBoe.  The PUD additions were primarily in the Permian Basin and, to a lesser extent, the Rocky Mountain area, and 82% of the additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs.  During 2016, EOG drilled and transferred 149 MMBoe of PUDs to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $1,230 million.  Revisions of PUDs totaled positive 64 MMBoe, primarily due to improved well performance, primarily in the Delaware Basin, and lower production costs, partially offset by the impact of decreases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2016, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate.  During 2016, EOG sold 46 MMBoe of PUDs primarily in the Haynesville play. All PUDs for drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs) are scheduled for completion within five years of the original reserve booking.

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015, total PUDs decreased by 104 MMBoe to 1,046 MMBoe. 
EOG added approximately 52 MMBoe of PUDs through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion.  Based on the technology employed by EOG to identify and record PUDs, EOG added 153 MMBoe.  The PUD additions were primarily in the Permian Basin and, to a lesser extent, the Eagle Ford and the Rocky Mountain area, and 80% of the additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs.  During 2015, EOG drilled and transferred 121 MMBoe of PUDs to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $2,349 million.  Revisions of PUDs totaled negative 242 MMBoe, primarily due to decreases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the December 31, 2015, reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate.  During 2015, EOG did not sell any PUDs and acquired 54 MMBoe of PUDs.RESOURCES, INC.

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014, total PUDs increased by 158 MMBoe to 1,149 MMBoe.  EOG added approximately 50 MMBoe of PUDs through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion.  Based on the technology employed by EOG to identify and record PUDs, EOG added 354 MMBoe.  The PUD additions were primarily in the Eagle Ford and Permian Basin, and 80% of the additions were crude oil and condensate and NGLs.  During 2014, EOG drilled and transferred 160 MMBoe of PUDs to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $2,655 million.  Revisions of PUDs totaled negative 80 MMBoe, primarily due to removal of certain natural gas PUDs.  During 2014, EOG sold 10 MMBoe and acquired 4 MMBoe of PUDs.SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities.  The following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to EOG's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
 2016 2015
    
Proved properties$45,751,965
 $49,623,518
Unproved properties3,840,126
 989,723
Total49,592,091
 50,613,241
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization(26,247,062) (28,877,593)
Net capitalized costs$23,345,029
 $21,735,648

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 2018 2017
    
Proved properties$53,624,809
 $48,845,672
Unproved properties3,705,207
 3,710,069
Total57,330,016
 52,555,741
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization(31,674,085) (29,191,247)
Net capitalized costs$25,655,931
 $23,364,494

Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development Activities.  The acquisition, exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the Extractive Industries - Oil and Gas Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).

Acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire property.

Exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells, including those in progress, and exploration expenses.

Development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells, including those in progress.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table sets forth costs incurred related to EOG's oil and gas activities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
2016       
2018       
Acquisition Costs of Properties              
Unproved (2)
$3,216,598
 $
 $36
 $3,216,634
$486,081
 $1,258
 $
 $487,339
Proved (3)
749,023
 
 
 749,023
123,684
 
 
 123,684
Subtotal3,965,621
 
 36
 3,965,657
609,765
 1,258
 
 611,023
Exploration Costs156,295
 2,695
 6,761
 165,751
157,222
 22,511
 13,895
 193,628
Development Costs (4)
2,252,713
 72,147
 (10,984) 2,313,876
5,605,264
 (12,863) 22,628
 5,615,029
Total$6,374,629
 $74,842
 $(4,187) $6,445,284
$6,372,251
 $10,906
 $36,523
 $6,419,680
2015 
  
  
  
2017 
  
  
  
Acquisition Costs of Properties 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Unproved$133,801
 $
 $56
 $133,857
Proved480,617
 
 
 480,617
Unproved (5)
$424,118
 $2,422
 $
 $426,540
Proved (6)
72,584
 
 
 72,584
Subtotal614,418
 
 56
 614,474
496,702
 2,422
 
 499,124
Exploration Costs206,814
 22,837
 23,041
 252,692
144,499
 62,547
 16,553
 223,599
Development Costs (5)(7)
3,847,813
 102,715
 110,589
 4,061,117
3,590,899
 109,491
 16,297
 3,716,687
Total$4,669,045
 $125,552
 $133,686
 $4,928,283
$4,232,100
 $174,460
 $32,850
 $4,439,410
2014 
  
  
  
2016 
  
  
  
Acquisition Costs of Properties 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Unproved$365,915
 $
 $4,499
 $370,414
Proved138,772
 
 329
 139,101
Unproved (8)
$3,216,598
 $
 $36
 $3,216,634
Proved (9)
749,023
 
 
 749,023
Subtotal504,687
 
 4,828
 509,515
3,965,621
 
 36
 3,965,657
Exploration Costs332,703
 2,794
 60,476
 395,973
156,295
 2,695
 6,761
 165,751
Development Costs (6)
6,638,192
 89,555
 271,534
 6,999,281
Development Costs (10)
2,252,713
 72,147
 (10,984) 2,313,876
Total$7,475,582
 $92,349
 $336,838
 $7,904,769
$6,374,629
 $74,842
 $(4,187) $6,445,284
 
(1)Other International primarily consists of EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(2)Includes non-cash unproved leasehold acquisition costs of $3,102$291 million related to the Yates transaction.property exchanges.
(3)Includes non-cash proved property acquisition costs of $732$71 million related to the Yates transaction.property exchanges.
(4)Includes Asset Retirement Costs of $25$90 million, $(3)$(12) million and $(42)$(8) million for the United States, Trinidad and Other International, respectively. Excludes other property, plant and equipment.
(5)Includes non-cash unproved leasehold acquisition costs of $256 million related to property exchanges.
(6)Includes non-cash proved property acquisition costs of $26 million related to property exchanges.
(7)Includes Asset Retirement Costs of $32$50 million, $15$2 million and $6$4 million for the United States, Trinidad and Other International, respectively. Excludes other property, plant and equipment.
(6)(8)Includes non-cash unproved leasehold acquisition costs of $3,102 million related to the Yates transaction.
(9)Includes non-cash proved property acquisition costs of $732 million related to the Yates transaction.
(10)Includes Asset Retirement Costs of $149$25 million, $14$(3) million and $33$(42) million for the United States, Trinidad and Other International, respectively.  Excludes other property, plant and equipment.



EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (1). The following table sets forth results of operations for oil and gas producing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (2)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (2)
 Total
2018       
Crude Oil and Condensate, Natural Gas Liquids and Natural Gas Revenues$11,488,620
 $302,112
 $155,755
 $11,946,487
Other89,708
 (49) (24) 89,635
Total11,578,328
 302,063
 155,731
 12,036,122
Exploration Costs121,572
 21,402
 6,025
 148,999
Dry Hole Costs4,983
 
 422
 5,405
Transportation Costs742,792
 3,236
 848
 746,876
Gathering and Processing Costs (3)
404,471
 
 32,502
 436,973
Production Costs1,924,504
 33,506
 70,073
 2,028,083
Impairments344,595
 
 2,426
 347,021
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,181,801
 91,788
 46,687
 3,320,276
Income Before Income Taxes4,853,610
 152,131
 (3,252) 5,002,489
Income Tax Provision1,086,077
 12,170
 1,898
 1,100,145
Results of Operations$3,767,533
 $139,961
 $(5,150) $3,902,344
2017 
  
  
  
Crude Oil and Condensate, Natural Gas Liquids and Natural Gas Revenues$7,570,768
 $284,673
 $52,450
 $7,907,891
Other81,610
 59
 (59) 81,610
Total7,652,378
 284,732
 52,391
 7,989,501
Exploration Costs113,334
 26,245
 5,763
 145,342
Dry Hole Costs91
 
 4,518
 4,609
Transportation Costs737,403
 1,885
 1,064
 740,352
Production Costs1,446,333
 27,839
 88,038
 1,562,210
Impairments477,223
 
 2,017
 479,240
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,157,056
 115,174
 24,536
 3,296,766
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes1,720,938
 113,589
 (73,545) 1,760,982
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)625,562
 24,882
 (1,342) 649,102
Results of Operations$1,095,376
 $88,707
 $(72,203) $1,111,880
2016        
  
  
  
Crude Oil and Condensate, Natural Gas Liquids and Natural Gas Revenues$5,177,989
 $243,708
 $75,046
 $5,496,743
$5,177,989
 $243,708
 $75,046
 $5,496,743
Other81,386
 (8) 25
 81,403
81,386
 (8) 25
 81,403
Total5,259,375
 243,700
 75,071
 5,578,146
5,259,375
 243,700
 75,071
 5,578,146
Exploration Costs115,990
 2,647
 6,316
 124,953
115,990
 2,647
 6,316
 124,953
Dry Hole Costs10,529
 
 128
 10,657
10,529
 
 128
 10,657
Transportation Costs753,791
 1,181
 9,134
 764,106
753,791
 1,181
 9,134
 764,106
Production Costs1,163,827
 27,113
 63,073
 1,254,013
1,163,827
 27,113
 63,073
 1,254,013
Impairments611,297
 7,773
 1,197
 620,267
611,297
 7,773
 1,197
 620,267
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,249,792
 145,440
 42,052
 3,437,284
3,249,792
 145,440
 42,052
 3,437,284
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes(645,851) 59,546
 (46,829) (633,134)(645,851) 59,546
 (46,829) (633,134)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)(230,377) 5,526
 (1,562) (226,413)(230,377) 5,526
 (1,562) (226,413)
Results of Operations$(415,474) $54,020
 $(45,267) $(406,721)$(415,474) $54,020
 $(45,267) $(406,721)
2015 
  
  
  
Crude Oil and Condensate, Natural Gas Liquids and Natural Gas Revenues$5,962,753
 $381,761
 $58,744
 $6,403,258
Other47,464
 (3) 448
 47,909
Total6,010,217
 381,758
 59,192
 6,451,167
Exploration Costs139,753
 2,071
 7,670
 149,494
Dry Hole Costs956
 5,635
 8,155
 14,746
Transportation Costs838,428
 1,290
 9,601
 849,319
Production Costs1,486,189
 28,862
 66,080
 1,581,131
Impairments6,402,908
 
 210,638
 6,613,546
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,017,386
 154,588
 18,469
 3,190,443
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes(5,875,403) 189,312
 (261,421) (5,947,512)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)(2,128,183) 43,739
 (2,111) (2,086,555)
Results of Operations$(3,747,220) $145,573
 $(259,310) $(3,860,957)
2014 
  
  
  
Crude Oil and Condensate, Natural Gas Liquids and Natural Gas Revenues$11,771,777
 $512,675
 $308,465
 $12,592,917
Other49,950
 37
 4,257
 54,244
Total11,821,727
 512,712
 312,722
 12,647,161
Exploration Costs162,434
 2,185
 19,769
 184,388
Dry Hole Costs25,408
 
 23,082
 48,490
Transportation Costs957,522
 617
 14,037
 972,176
Production Costs1,940,074
 38,301
 171,652
 2,150,027
Impairments331,792
 
 411,783
 743,575
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization3,571,313
 188,250
 122,157
 3,881,720
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes4,833,184
 283,359
 (449,758) 4,666,785
Income Tax Provision1,722,914
 74,588
 23,602
 1,821,104
Results of Operations$3,110,270
 $208,771
 $(473,360) $2,845,681
 
(1)Excludes gains or losses on the mark-to-market of financial commodity derivative contracts, gains or losses on sales of reserves and related assets, interest charges and general corporate expenses for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016.2018.
(2)Other International primarily consists of EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(3)Effective January 1, 2018, EOG adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers" (ASU 2014-09). In connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, EOG presents natural gas processing fees relating to certain processing and marketing agreements within its United States segment as Gathering and Processing Costs instead of as a deduction to Natural Gas Revenues. There was no impact to operating income or net income resulting from changes to the presentation of natural gas processing fees (see Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table sets forth production costs per barrel of oil equivalent, excluding severance/production and ad valorem taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
 
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Composite
        
Year Ended December 31, 2016$4.58
 $1.23
 $22.43
 $4.48
Year Ended December 31, 2015$5.81
 $1.29
 $33.78
 $5.85
Year Ended December 31, 2014$6.44
 $1.34
 $24.60
 $6.46
 
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Composite
        
Year Ended December 31, 2018$4.84
 $1.67
 $20.19
 $4.84
Year Ended December 31, 2017$4.58
 $1.39
 $50.86
 $4.66
Year Ended December 31, 2016$4.58
 $1.23
 $22.43
 $4.48
 
(1)Other International primarily consists of EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves.  The following information has been developed utilizing procedures prescribed by the Extractive Industries - Oil and Gas Topic of the ASC and based on crude oil, NGL and natural gas reserves and production volumes estimated by the Engineering and Acquisitions Department of EOG.  The estimates were based on a 12-month average for commodity prices for the years 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014.2016.  The following information may be useful for certain comparative purposes, but should not be solely relied upon in evaluating EOG or its performance. Further, information contained in the following table should not be considered as representative of realistic assessments of future cash flows, nor should the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows be viewed as representative of the current value of EOG.

The future cash flows presented below are based on sales prices, cost rates and statutory income tax rates in existence as of the date of the projections.  It is expected that material revisions to some estimates of crude oil, NGL and natural gas reserves may occur in the future, development and production of the reserves may occur in periods other than those assumed, and actual prices realized and costs incurred may vary significantly from those used.

Management does not rely upon the following information in making investment and operating decisions.  Such decisions are based upon a wide range of factors, including estimates of probable and possible reserves as well as proved reserves, and varying price and cost assumptions considered more representative of a range of possible economic conditions that may be anticipated.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table sets forth the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from projected production of EOG's oil and gas reserves for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
2016       
2018       
Future cash inflows (2)
$57,913,314
 $524,523
 $402,587
 $58,840,424
$133,066,375
 $749,695
 $303,620
 $134,119,690
Future production costs(27,625,833) (165,757) (227,293) (28,018,883)(42,351,174) (204,444) (99,024) (42,654,642)
Future development costs(12,602,699) (103,631) (35,602) (12,741,932)(16,577,794) (78,199) (11,900) (16,667,893)
Future income taxes(3,151,319) (60,001) 
 (3,211,320)(14,756,011) (174,382) (31,748) (14,962,141)
Future net cash flows14,533,463
 195,134
 139,692
 14,868,289
59,381,396
 292,670
 160,948
 59,835,014
Discount to present value at 10% annual rate(6,039,736) (9,384) (7,012) (6,056,132)(27,348,744) (26,832) (33,483) (27,409,059)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves$8,493,727
 $185,750
 $132,680
 $8,812,157
$32,032,652
 $265,838
 $127,465
 $32,425,955
2015 
  
  
  
2017 
  
  
  
Future cash inflows (3)
$67,242,928
 $954,779
 $522,941
 $68,720,648
$83,652,363
 $904,141
 $664,560
 $85,221,064
Future production costs(31,707,743) (183,607) (169,505) (32,060,855)(32,018,812) (239,213) (311,383) (32,569,408)
Future development costs(15,579,923) (140,541) (65,347) (15,785,811)(13,395,873) (84,379) (58,543) (13,538,795)
Future income taxes(4,400,542) (215,659) 
 (4,616,201)(5,948,453) (195,855) (16,233) (6,160,541)
Future net cash flows15,554,720
 414,972
 288,089
 16,257,781
32,289,225
 384,694
 278,401
 32,952,320
Discount to present value at 10% annual rate(6,589,253) (33,848) (13,284) (6,636,385)(14,532,290) (52,267) (40,103) (14,624,660)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves$8,965,467
 $381,124
 $274,805
 $9,621,396
$17,756,935
 $332,427
 $238,298
 $18,327,660
2014 
  
  
  
2016 
  
  
  
Future cash inflows (4)
$144,355,692
 $1,615,280
 $979,249
 $146,950,221
$57,913,314
 $524,523
 $402,587
 $58,840,424
Future production costs(51,112,604) (277,844) (242,845) (51,633,293)(27,625,833) (165,757) (227,293) (28,018,883)
Future development costs(20,270,439) (84,576) (139,750) (20,494,765)(12,602,699) (103,631) (35,602) (12,741,932)
Future income taxes(22,725,618) (460,096) 
 (23,185,714)(3,151,319) (60,001) 
 (3,211,320)
Future net cash flows50,247,031
 792,764
 596,654
 51,636,449
14,533,463
 195,134
 139,692
 14,868,289
Discount to present value at 10% annual rate(23,542,990) (110,228) (59,813) (23,713,031)(6,039,736) (9,384) (7,012) (6,056,132)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves$26,704,041
 $682,536
 $536,841
 $27,923,418
$8,493,727
 $185,750
 $132,680
 $8,812,157
 
(1)Other International includes EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
(2)Estimated crude oil prices used to calculate 2018 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $68.54, $55.66 and $61.66, respectively. Estimated NGL price used to calculate 2018 future cash inflows for the United States was $27.83. Estimated natural gas prices used to calculate 2018 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $2.50, $3.06 and $4.88, respectively.
(3)Estimated crude oil prices used to calculate 2017 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $49.21, $41.87 and $50.06, respectively. Estimated NGL price used to calculate 2017 future cash inflows for the United States was $23.51. Estimated natural gas prices used to calculate 2017 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $1.96, $2.76 and $5.16, respectively.
(4)Estimated crude oil prices used to calculate 2016 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $40.70, $34.79 and $39.55, respectively. Estimated NGL price used to calculate 2016 future cash inflows for the United States was $14.69. Estimated natural gas prices used to calculate 2016 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $1.40, $1.76 and $4.84, respectively.
(3)Estimated crude oil prices used to calculate 2015 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $49.58, $38.83 and $47.76, respectively. Estimated NGL price used to calculate 2015 future cash inflows for the United States was $15.17. Estimated natural gas prices used to calculate 2015 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $2.15, $2.88 and $5.60, respectively.
(4)Estimated crude oil prices used to calculate 2014 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $97.51, $80.60 and $94.09, respectively. Estimated NGL prices used to calculate 2014 future cash inflows for the United States and Other International were $34.29 and $27.03, respectively. Estimated natural gas prices used to calculate 2014 future cash inflows for the United States, Trinidad and Other International were $3.71, $3.71 and $5.14, respectively.



EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows.  The following table sets forth the changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at December 31, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016:2018:
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
United
States
 Trinidad 
Other
International (1)
 Total
              
December 31, 2013$19,576,901
 $876,640
 $879,891
 $21,333,432
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs(8,874,180) (473,757) (122,777) (9,470,714)
Net changes in prices and production costs1,481,668
 (12,079) (206,412) 1,263,177
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery, net of related costs8,074,550
 3,113
 6,189
 8,083,852
Development costs incurred2,818,800
 12,800
 3,500
 2,835,100
Revisions of estimated development cost1,696,916
 9,981
 95,838
 1,802,735
Revisions of previous quantity estimates1,741,918
 35,001
 35,613
 1,812,532
Accretion of discount2,612,286
 133,019
 88,045
 2,833,350
Net change in income taxes(3,743,300) 91,438
 562
 (3,651,300)
Purchases of reserves in place317,785
 
 
 317,785
Sales of reserves in place(189,808) 
 (289,071) (478,879)
Changes in timing and other1,190,505
 6,380
 45,463
 1,242,348
December 31, 201426,704,041
 682,536
 536,841
 27,923,418
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs(3,685,600) (351,606) 16,489
 (4,020,717)
Net changes in prices and production costs(29,993,699) (370,503) (305,148) (30,669,350)
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery, net of related costs1,028,410
 47,613
 19,875
 1,095,898
Development costs incurred2,135,800
 500
 1,400
 2,137,700
Revisions of estimated development cost4,087,093
 (34,647) 26,935
 4,079,381
Revisions of previous quantity estimates(4,084,572) 33,285
 (587) (4,051,874)
Accretion of discount3,699,330
 104,464
 53,685
 3,857,479
Net change in income taxes9,550,847
 177,576
 
 9,728,423
Purchases of reserves in place123,542
 
 
 123,542
Sales of reserves in place(23,424) 
 (13,664) (37,088)
Changes in timing and other(576,301) 91,906
 (61,021) (545,416)
December 31, 20158,965,467
 381,124
 274,805
 9,621,396
$8,965,467
 $381,124
 $274,805
 $9,621,396
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs(3,260,372) (215,414) (2,839) (3,478,625)(3,260,372) (215,414) (2,839) (3,478,625)
Net changes in prices and production costs(3,352,802) (182,876) (143,924) (3,679,602)(3,352,802) (182,876) (143,924) (3,679,602)
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery, net of related costs865,066
 42,201
 
 907,267
865,066
 42,201
 
 907,267
Development costs incurred1,207,000
 3,900
 19,100
 1,230,000
1,207,000
 3,900
 19,100
 1,230,000
Revisions of estimated development cost2,092,769
 22,596
 6,343
 2,121,708
2,092,769
 22,596
 6,343
 2,121,708
Revisions of previous quantity estimates1,013,753
 36,648
 2,619
 1,053,020
1,013,753
 36,648
 2,619
 1,053,020
Accretion of discount970,388
 56,566
 27,481
 1,054,435
970,388
 56,566
 27,481
 1,054,435
Net change in income taxes738,416
 129,622
 
 868,038
738,416
 129,622
 
 868,038
Purchases of reserves in place377,872
 
 
 377,872
377,872
 
 
 377,872
Sales of reserves in place(375,793) 
 
 (375,793)(375,793) 
 
 (375,793)
Changes in timing and other(748,037) (88,617) (50,905) (887,559)(748,037) (88,617) (50,905) (887,559)
December 31, 2016$8,493,727
 $185,750
 $132,680
 $8,812,157
8,493,727
 185,750
 132,680
 8,812,157
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs(5,387,031) (254,948) 36,649
 (5,605,330)
Net changes in prices and production costs6,606,908
 436,969
 77,668
 7,121,545
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery, net of related costs3,644,041
 270,255
 43,952
 3,958,248
Development costs incurred1,435,600
 4,700
 
 1,440,300
Revisions of estimated development cost(114,464) 9,683
 (20,096) (124,877)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates2,460,498
 (58,373) 36,146
 2,438,271
Accretion of discount849,373
 24,066
 13,268
 886,707
Net change in income taxes(1,918,989)��(114,575) (10,099) (2,043,663)
Purchases of reserves in place30,362
 
 
 30,362
Sales of reserves in place(76,527) 
 
 (76,527)
Changes in timing and other1,733,437
 (171,100) (71,870) 1,490,467
December 31, 201717,756,935
 332,427
 238,298
 18,327,660
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs(8,416,853) (265,370) (52,399) (8,734,622)
Net changes in prices and production costs12,750,466
 84,353
 21,610
 12,856,429
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery, net of related costs8,418,666
 
 12,287
 8,430,953
Development costs incurred2,732,560
 
 12,600
 2,745,160
Revisions of estimated development cost(410,741) 4,030
 (3,814) (410,525)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates(173,084) 39,608
 31,750
 (101,726)
Accretion of discount1,967,592
 50,191
 24,839
 2,042,622
Net change in income taxes(4,965,373) 3,844
 (11,529) (4,973,058)
Purchases of reserves in place116,887
 
 
 116,887
Sales of reserves in place(35,874) 
 (82,058) (117,932)
Changes in timing and other2,291,471
 16,755
 (64,119) 2,244,107
December 31, 2018$32,032,652
 $265,838
 $127,465
 $32,425,955
 
(1)Other International includes EOG's United Kingdom, China, Canada and Argentina operations. The United Kingdom operations were sold in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Argentina operations were sold in the third quarter of 2016.
EOG RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Concluded)

Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Quarter EndedMar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31
2016       
Net Operating Revenues$1,354,349
 $1,775,740
 $2,118,504
 $2,402,039
Operating Loss$(638,141) $(288,173) $(193,480) $(105,487)
Loss Before Income Taxes$(710,968) $(380,277) $(272,250) $(194,010)
Income Tax Benefit(239,192) (87,719) (82,250) (51,658)
Net Loss$(471,776) $(292,558) $(190,000) $(142,352)
Net Loss Per Share (1)
 
  
  
  
Basic$(0.86) $(0.53) $(0.35) $(0.25)
Diluted$(0.86) $(0.53) $(0.35) $(0.25)
Average Number of Common Shares 
  
  
  
Basic546,715
 547,335
 547,838
 567,337
Diluted546,715
 547,335
 547,838
 567,337
2015 
  
  
  
Net Operating Revenues$2,318,538
 $2,469,701
 $2,172,428
 $1,796,761
Operating Income (Loss)$(172,995) $39,626
 $(6,222,957) $(329,753)
Loss Before Income Taxes$(236,331) $(11,478) $(6,274,921) $(398,826)
Income Tax Benefit(66,583) (16,746) (2,199,182) (114,530)
Net Income (Loss)$(169,748) $5,268
 $(4,075,739) $(284,296)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share (1)
 
  
  
  
Basic$(0.31) $0.01
 $(7.47) $(0.52)
Diluted$(0.31) $0.01
 $(7.47) $(0.52)
Average Number of Common Shares 
  
  
  
Basic544,998
 545,504
 545,920
 546,432
Diluted544,998
 549,683
 545,920
 546,432
Quarter EndedMar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31
2018       
Operating Revenues and Other$3,681,162
 $4,238,077
 $4,781,624
 $4,574,536
Operating Income$874,588
 $964,931
 $1,506,687
 $1,123,140
Income Before Income Taxes$813,359
 $892,936
 $1,446,363
 $1,088,340
Income Tax Provision174,770
 196,205
 255,411
 195,572
Net Income$638,589
 $696,731
 $1,190,952
 $892,768
Net Income Per Share (1)
 
  
  
  
Basic$1.11
 $1.21
 $2.06
 $1.55
Diluted$1.10
 $1.20
 $2.05
 $1.54
Average Number of Common Shares 
  
  
  
Basic575,775
 576,135
 577,254
 577,035
Diluted579,726
 580,375
 581,559
 580,288
2017 
  
  
  
Operating Revenues and Other$2,610,565
 $2,612,472
 $2,644,844
 $3,340,439
Operating Income$107,746
 $127,908
 $214,836
 $475,912
Income Before Income Taxes$39,382
 $62,467
 $145,980
 $413,353
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) (2)
10,865
 39,414
 45,439
 (2,017,115)
Net Income$28,517
 $23,053
 $100,541
 $2,430,468
Net Income Per Share (1)
 
  
  
  
Basic$0.05
 $0.04
 $0.17
 $4.22
Diluted$0.05
 $0.04
 $0.17
 $4.20
Average Number of Common Shares 
  
  
  
Basic573,935
 574,439
 574,783
 575,394
Diluted578,593
 578,483
 578,736
 579,203
 
(1)The sum of quarterly net income (loss) per share may not agree with total year net income (loss) per share as each quarterly computation is based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding.

(2)Includes an income tax benefit of approximately $2.2 billion for the quarter ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


EXHIBITS

Exhibits not incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing are designated by (i) an asterisk (*) and are filed herewith; or (ii) a pound sign (#) and are not filed herewith, and, pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of such exhibit to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) upon request.
Exhibit
Number
 
 
Description
   
***2.1-
   
    3.1(a)-
   
    3.1(b)-
   
    3.1(c)-
   
    3.1(d)-
   
    3.1(e)-
   
    3.1(f)-
   
    3.1(g)-
   
    3.1(h)-
   
    3.1(i)-
   
    3.1(j)-
   
    3.1(k)-
   
    3.1(l)-
   
    3.1(m)-
    3.1(n)-
   
    3.2-
   
    4.1-
   
    4.2-Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1991, between Enron Oil & Gas Company (predecessor to EOG) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly, Texas Commerce Bank National Association)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(a) to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 33-42640, filed in paper format on September 6, 1991).
   
      4.3(a)-Officers' Certificate Establishing 6.125% Senior Notes due 2013 and 6.875% Senior Notes due 2018 of EOG, dated September 30, 2008 (Exhibit 4.2 to EOG's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 30, 2008) (SEC File No. 001-09743).


Exhibit
Number
 Description
   
  4.3(b)-Form of Global Note with respect to the 6.875% Senior Notes due 2018 of EOG (Exhibit 4.4 to EOG's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 30, 2008) (SEC File No. 001-09743).
  4.4(a)-Officers' Certificate Establishing 5.875% Senior Notes due 2017 of EOG, dated September 10, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2 to EOG's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 10, 2007) (SEC File No. 001-09743).
  4.4(b)-Form of Global Note with respect to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2017 of EOG (Exhibit 4.3 to EOG's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 10, 2007) (SEC File No. 001-09743).
#4.5(a)#4.3(a)-Certificate, dated April 3, 1998, of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Enron Oil & Gas Company (predecessor to EOG) establishing the terms of the 6.65% Notes due April 1, 2028 of Enron Oil & Gas Company.
   
#4.5(b)#4.3(b)-Global Note with respect to the 6.65% Notes due April 1, 2028 of Enron Oil & Gas Company (predecessor to EOG).
   
  4.64.4-
   
  4.7(a)4.5(a)-
   
  4.7(b)4.5(b)-
   
  4.8(a)4.6(a)-
   
  4.8(b)4.6(b)-
   
  4.9(a)4.7(a)-
   
  4.9(b)4.7(b)-
   
  4.10(a)4.8(a)-
   
  4.10(b)4.8(b)-
   
  4.11(a)4.9(a)-
   
  4.11(b)4.9(b)-
   
  4.12(a)4.10(a)-
   
  4.12(b)4.10(b)-
   
  4.12(c)4.10(c)-
   
  4.13(a)4.11(a)-
   
  4.13(b)4.11(b)-


Exhibit Number
Description
   
  4.13(c)4.11(c)-
  4.14-Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2016, among EOG and the stockholders of Yates Petroleum Corporation set forth therein (Exhibit 4.1 to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-214894, filed December 2, 2016).
  4.15-Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2016, among EOG and the stockholders of Abo Petroleum Corporation set forth therein (Exhibit 4.2 to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-214894, filed December 2, 2016).
  4.16-Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2016, among EOG and the stockholders of MYCO Industries, Inc. set forth therein (Exhibit 4.3 to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-214894, filed December 2, 2016).
  4.17-Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2016, by and between EOG and Trust Q u/w/o Peggy A. Yates (deceased) dated November 20, 1989 (Exhibit 4.4 to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-214894, filed December 2, 2016).
  4.18-Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2016, by and between EOG and Los Chicos (Exhibit 4.5 to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-214894, filed December 2, 2016).
  4.19-Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2016, by and between EOG and Yates Industries, LLC (Exhibit 4.6 to EOG's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-214894, filed December 2, 2016).
   
10.1(a)+-
   
10.1(b)+-


Exhibit
Number
Description
   
10.1(c)+-
   
10.1(d)+-
   
10.1(e)+-
   
10.1(f)+-
   
10.1(g)+-
   
10.1(h)+-
   
10.1(i)-
   
10.1(j)+-
   
10.1(k)+-


Exhibit Number
Description
   
10.1(l)-
   
10.1(m)-
   
10.1(n)+-
10.1(o)+-Form of Performance Stock Award Agreement for EOG Resources, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10.5 to EOG's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2012) (SEC File No. 001-09743).
   
10.2(a)+-
   
10.2(b)+-
   
10.2(c)+-
10.2(d)+-
10.2(e)+-


Exhibit
Number
Description
   
10.2(d)10.2(f)+-
10.2(g)+-
10.2(h)+-
   
10.2(e)10.2(i)+-
10.2(j)+-
   
10.2(f)10.2(k)+-
   
10.2(g)10.2(l)+-
   
10.2(h)10.2(m)+-
10.2(n)+-
10.2(o)+-
   
10.2(i)10.2(p)+-
   
10.2(j)10.2(q)-
   
10.2(k)10.2(r)-
   
10.3(a)+-
   
   


Exhibit
Number
 Description
   
10.3(b)+-
   
10.3(c)+-
   
*10.3(d)+-
  10.3(e)+-
   
10.3(e)
  10.3(f)+-
   
10.4(a)-EOG Resources, Inc. 1993 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated effective May 7, 2002 (Exhibit A to EOG's Proxy Statement, filed March 28, 2002, with respect to EOG's 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders) (SEC File No. 001-09743).
10.4(b)-First Amendment to EOG Resources, Inc. 1993 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan, dated effective as of December 30, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2(b) to EOG's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005) (SEC File No. 001-09743).
10.5(a)+-
   
10.5(b)  10.4(b)+-
   
10.5(c)  10.4(c)+-
   
10.6(a)  10.5(a)+-
   
10.6(b)  10.5(b)+-
   
10.6(c)  10.5(c)+-
   
10.6(d)  10.5(d)+-
   
10.7(a)  10.6(a)+-
   
10.7(b)  10.6(b)+-
   
10.7(c)  10.6(c)+-
   
10.8(a)  10.7(a)+-


Exhibit Number
Description
   
  10.8(b)10.7(b)+-
   
  10.9(a)10.8(a)+-


Exhibit
Number
Description
   
          10.9(b)10.8(b)+-
   
          10.10+10.9(a)+-
*        10.9(b)+-
   
          10.11(a)10.10+-
*        10.11+-
          10.12(a)+-
   
          10.11(b)10.12(b)+-
   
          10.12+10.13+-
   
          10.13(a)10.14(a)+-
          10.14(b)+-
   
          10.13(b)10.14(c)+-
   
          10.1410.15-
*        12-Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
   
*        21-
   
*        23.1-
   
*        23.2-Opinion of DeGolyer and MacNaughton dated January 30, 2017.
*        23.3-
   
*        24-
   
*        31.1-
   
*        31.2-
   
*        32.1-
   
*        32.2-
   
*        95-
*        99.1-


Exhibit
Number
Description
   
*  ***101.INS-XBRL Instance Document.
   
*  ***101.SCH-XBRL Schema Document.
   
*  ***101.CAL-XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
   
*  ***101.LAB-XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
   
*  ***101.PRE-XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
   
*  ***101.DEF-XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.



*Exhibits filed herewith

**Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2016, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2016, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2016 and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

***Annexes, exhibit and disclosure schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A list of the annexes and exhibit is included after the table of contents in the Agreement and Plan of Merger. The disclosure schedules set forth various matters in respect of the representations, warranties, covenants and other provisions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger. The registrant agrees to furnish a supplemental copy of any such omitted annexes, exhibit or disclosure schedules to the SEC upon request.

***Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2018, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2018 and 2017, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2018, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2018 and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
   EOG RESOURCES, INC.
   (Registrant)
    
    
    
Date:February 27, 201726, 2019By:
/s/ TIMOTHY K. DRIGGERS                                                                        
Timothy K. Driggers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities with EOG Resources, Inc. indicated and on the 2726th day of February, 2017.2019.
 SignatureTitle
   
 /s/ WILLIAM R. THOMASChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and
 (William R. Thomas)Director (Principal Executive Officer)
   
 /s/ TIMOTHY K. DRIGGERSExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (Timothy K. Driggers)(Principal Financial Officer)
   
 /s/ ANN D. JANSSENSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
 (Ann D. Janssen)(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
 *Director
 (Janet F. Clark) 
   
 *Director
 (Charles R. Crisp) 
   
 *Director
 (Robert P. Daniels)
*Director
(James C. Day) 
   
 *Director
 (H. Leighton Steward)C. Christopher Gaut)
*Director
(Julie J. Robertson) 
   
 *Director
 (Donald F. Textor) 
   
 *Director
 (Frank G. Wisner) 
   
   
*By:/s/ MICHAEL P. DONALDSON 
 (Michael P. Donaldson) 
 (Attorney-in-fact for persons indicated) 




EOG RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
INDEX OF EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number
Description
*      12-Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
*      21-Subsidiaries of EOG, as of December 31, 2016.
*      23.1-Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.
*      23.2-Opinion of DeGolyer and MacNaughton dated January 30, 2017.
*      23.3-Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
*      24-Powers of Attorney.
*      31.1-Section 302 Certification of Annual Report of Principal Executive Officer.
*      31.2-Section 302 Certification of Annual Report of Principal Financial Officer.
*      32.1-Section 906 Certification of Annual Report of Principal Executive Officer.
*      32.2-Section 906 Certification of Annual Report of Principal Financial Officer.
*      95-Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit.
*  **101.INS-XBRL Instance Document.
*  **101.SCH-XBRL Schema Document.
*  **101.CAL-XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
*  **101.LAB-XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
*  **101.PRE-XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
*  **101.DEF-XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.


*Exhibits filed herewith

**Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2016, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2016, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2016 and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.