SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122015
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-9804 

PULTEGROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
MICHIGAN 38-2766606
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
100 Bloomfield Hills Parkway,3350 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 300150
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304Atlanta, Georgia 30326
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 647-2750(404) 978-6400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01New York Stock Exchange
PulteGroup, Inc. 7.375% Senior Notes due 2046 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  YES  [X]  NO  [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   YES [ ]  NO  [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  [X]  NO  [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Act.  YES  [X]  NO  [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [X]            Accelerated filer [ ]             Non-accelerated filer [ ]            Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  YES [ ]  NO  [X]
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20122015, based on the closing sale price per share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was $4,069,916,3767,084,534,862.
As of February 1, 20132016, the registrant had 386,598,562349,148,351 shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Applicable portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form.



PULTEGROUP, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Item
No.
 
Page
No.
 
Page
No.
  
  
1
  
1A
  
1B
  
2
  
3
  
4
  
4A
  
  
  
5
  
6
  
7
  
7A
  
8
  
9
  
9A
  
9B
  
  
  
10
  
11
  
12
  
13
  
14
  
  
  
15
  
 


2



PART I

ITEM I.     BUSINESS

PulteGroup, Inc.

PulteGroup, Inc. is a Michigan corporation organized in 1956. We are one of the largest homebuilders in the United States ("U.S."), and our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “PHM”. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "PulteGroup", the "Company", "we", "us", and "our" used herein refer to PulteGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries. While our subsidiaries engage primarily in the homebuilding business, we also have mortgage banking operations, conducted principally through Pulte Mortgage LLC (“Pulte Mortgage”), and title operations.

Homebuilding, our core business, includes the acquisition and development of land primarily for residential purposes within the United StatesU.S. and the construction of housing on such land. Homebuilding offers a broad product line to meet the needs of home buyershomebuyers in our targeted markets. Through our brands, which include Pulte Homes, Del Webb, and Centex, (acquired through our merger with Centex Corporation ("Centex") in August 2009), we offer a wide variety of home designs, including single-family detached, townhouses, condominiums, and duplexes at different prices and with varying levels of options and amenities to our major customer groups: entry-level,first-time, move-up, and active adult. Over our history, we have delivered over 600,000655,000 homes.

As of December 31, 20122015, we conducted our operations in 5850 markets located throughout 2826 states. For reporting purposes, our Homebuilding operations are aggregated into six reportable segments:
 
Northeast:  Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Virginia
Southeast: Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Florida: Florida
Midwest:Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio
Texas: Texas
North:Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Northern California, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
Southwest:West: Arizona, Colorado,California, Nevada, New Mexico, Southern California
Washington

We also have a reportable segment for our financial services operations, which consist principally of mortgage banking and title operations. Our Financial Services segment operates generally in the same geographic markets as our Homebuilding segments.

Financial information for each of our reportable business segments is included in Note 54 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Available information

Our internet website address is www.pultegroupinc.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our code of ethics for principal officers, our code of ethical business conduct, our corporate governance guidelines, and the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Governance, and Finance and Investment committeesCommittees of our Board of Directors are also posted on our website and are available in print, free of charge, upon request.


3



Homebuilding Operations

Years Ended December 31,
($000’s omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
($000’s omitted)
2012 2011 2010 2009 20082015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Home sale revenues$4,552,412
 $3,950,743
 $4,419,812
 $3,869,297
 $5,980,289
$5,792,675
 $5,662,171
 $5,424,309
 $4,552,412
 $3,950,743
Home closings16,505
 15,275
 17,095
 15,013
 21,022
17,127
 17,196
 17,766
 16,505
 15,275

In recent years,Beginning in 2006 and continuing through 2011, the U.S. housing market experienced a significant decline in the demand for new homes as well as a sharp decline in overall residential real estate values. U.S. new home sales in 2011 were the lowest since 1962. As a result of this industry-wide downturn, we suffered net losses in each year between 2007 - 2011 from a combination of reduced operational profitability and significant asset impairments. In response to these market conditions, we restructured our operations, including making significant reductions in employee headcount and overhead costs, and managed our business to generate cash, including curtailing our investments in inventory. We used this positive cash flow to, among other things, increase our cash reserves as well as retire outstanding debt.

In 2012, new home sales in the U.S. increased for the first time since 2005, rising 20% to 367,000 homes. However, this improvement was from a very low base2005. This trend continued in 2015 as U.S.new home sales in 2011 were the lowest since 1962.U.S. rose 15% to approximately 501,000 homes, an approximate 64% increase from 2011. Additionally, mortgage interest rates remain near historic lows and the overall inventory of homes available for sale, especially new homes, remains low. Although current industry volume remains very low compared towith historical levels, the improved environment and our restructuringthe actions we have taken contributed to our return to profitability in 2012.2012 and significant increases in our income before income taxes each year in the period 2013 - 2015. In the long term, we continue to believe that the national publicly-traded builders will have a competitive advantage over local builders through their ability to leverage economies of scale, access to more reliable and lower cost financing through the capital markets, ability to control and entitle large land positions, and greater geographic and product diversification. Among the national publicly-traded peer group, we believe that builders with more significant land positions, broad geographic and product diversity, and sustainable capital positions will benefit as market conditions recover. In the short-term, we expect that overall market conditions will continue to improve but that improvements will occur unevenly across our markets. Our strategy to enhance shareholder value is centered around the following operational objectives:

Improving our inventory turns;
More effectivelyEffectively allocating the capital investedwe invest in our business using a risk-based portfolio approach;
Maximizing our inventory turns while maintaining an adequate supply of house and land inventory;
Enhancing revenues through more strategic pricing, includingby: establishing clear product offerings for each of our brands based on systematic, consumer-driven input, optimizing our pricing through the expanded use of options and lot premiums, and lesseninglimiting our reliance on specspeculative home sales;
Reducing our house costs through common house plan management, value-engineering our house plans, and working with suppliers to reduce costs; and
Maintaining an efficient overhead structure.

Our Homebuilding operations are geographically diverse within the U.S. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had 670620 active communities.communities spanning 50 markets across 26 states. Sales prices of unit closings during 20122015 ranged from less than $100,000$100,000 to greater than $900,000,$1,500,000, with 85% falling within the range of $100,000$150,000 to $400,000.$500,000. The average unit selling price in 20122015 was $276,000,$338,000, compared with $259,000$329,000 in 2011, $259,0002014, $305,000 in 2010, $258,0002013, $276,000 in 2009,2012, and $284,000$259,000 in 2008.2011. The increase in average selling price in recent years resulted from a number of factors, including improved market conditions and a shift in our sales mix toward move-up and active adult homebuyers.

Sales of single-family detached homes, as a percentage of total unit sales, were 86% in 2015, compared with 86% in 2014, 85% in 2013, 81% in 2012, compared withand 79% in 2011, 79% in 2010, 77% in 2009, and 75% in 2008. The increase in the percentage of single-family detached homes can be attributed to a weakened demand for townhouses, condominiums, and other attached housing, as prices forshift in our business toward the move-up buyer, who tends to prefer detached new homes have become more affordable for entry-level and active adult homebuyers.homes.

Ending backlog, which represents orders for homes that have not yet closed, was $2.5 billion (6,731 units) at December 31, 2015 and $1.9 billion (6,4585,850 units) at December 31, 2012 and $1.1 billion (3,924 units) at December 31, 20112014. For each orderorders in backlog, we have received a signed customer contract and customer deposit, which is refundable in certain instances. Of the orders in backlog at December 31, 20122015, substantially all are scheduled to be closed during 20132016, though all orders are subject to potential cancellation by or final negotiations with the customer. In the event of cancellation, the majority of our sales contracts stipulate that we have the right to retain the customer’s deposit, though we may choose to refund the deposit in certain instances.


4



Land acquisition and development

We acquire land primarily for the construction of homes for sale to homebuyers, though we periodically sell select parcels of land to third parties for commercial or other development. Additionally, we may determine that certain land assets no longer fit into our strategic operating plans.homebuyers. We select locations for development of homebuilding communities after completing a feasibility study, which includes, among other things, soil tests, independent environmental studies and other engineering work, an evaluation of necessary zoning and other governmental entitlements, and extensive market research that enables us to match the location with our product offering to targeted consumer groups. We consider factors such as proximity to developed areas, population and job growth patterns, and, if applicable, estimated development costs. We frequently manage a portion of the risk of controlling our land positions through the use of land option contracts, which enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by land sellers until we have determined whether and when to exercise our option. Our use of land option agreements reduces ourthe financial risksrisk associated with long-term land holdings. We typically acquire land with the intent to complete sales of housing units within 24 to 36 months from the date of opening a community, except in the case of certain Del Webb active adult developments and other large master-planned projects for which the completion of community build-out requires a longer time period. While our overall supply of controlled land is in excess of our short-term needs in many of our markets, some of our controlled land consists of long-term positions that will not be converted to home sales in the near term. Accordingly, we remain active in our pursuit of new land investment. We may also periodically sell select parcels of land to third parties for commercial or other development if we determine that they do not fit into our strategic operating plans.

Land is generally purchased after it is properly zoned and developed, or is ready for development.development for our intended use. In the normal course of business, we dispose of owned land not required by our homebuilding operations through sales to appropriate end users.sales. Where we develop land, we engage directly in many phases of the development process, includingincluding: land and site planning, andplanning; obtaining environmental and other regulatory approvals, as well asapprovals; and constructing roads, sewers, water and drainage facilities, and community amenities, such as parks, pools, and clubhouses. We use our staff and the services of independent engineers and consultants for land development activities. Land development work is performed primarily by independent contractors and local government authorities who construct sewer and water systems in some areas. At December 31, 2012,2015, we controlled 119,875138,079 lots, of which 103,06095,919 were owned and 16,81542,160 were under land option agreements.

Sales and marketing

We are dedicated to improving the quality and value of our homes through innovative architectural and community designs. Analyzing various qualitative and quantitative data obtained through extensive market research, we stratify our potential customers into well-defined buyer groups. Such stratification provides a method for understanding the business opportunities and risks across the full spectrum of consumer groups in each market. Once the demands of potential buyers are understood, we link our home design and community development efforts to the specific lifestyle of each targeted consumer group. Through our portfolioevaluation of brands, each serving unique consumer groups, we are able to provide a distinct experience to potential customers:

Pulte HomesCentexDel Webb
Targeted consumer groupMove-up buyersEntry-level buyersActive adults
Portion of 2012 home closings43%31%26%
 First-TimeMove-UpActive Adult
Portion of home closings:   
201532%37%31%
201140%29%31%

The move-upOur homes targeted to first-time buyers in our Pulte Homes communitiestend to be smaller with product offerings geared toward lower average selling prices or higher density. Move-up buyers tend to place more of a premium on location and amenities. These communities typically offer larger homes at higher price points. Our Centex brand is targeted to entry-level buyers, and these homes tend to be smaller with product offerings geared toward lower average selling prices. Through our Del Webb brand, we are better able to address the needs of active adults. Our Del Webb brand offersadults, to whom we offer both destination communities and “in place” communities, for those buyers who prefer to remain in their current geographic area. TheseMany of these communities are highly amenitized, communities offeroffering a variety of features, including golf courses, recreational centers, and educational classes, to the age fifty-five and over buyer to maintain an active lifestyle. In order to make the cost of these highly amenitized communities affordable to the individual homeowner, Del Webb communities tend to be very large, consistinglarger than first-time or move-up buyer communities. As illustrated in some casesthe above table, our sales mix has shifted toward the move-up buyer in recent years. This has occurred primarily due to financial challenges facing the first-time buyer, including a recovering U.S. economy, the overhang of several thousand homes,consumer debt, especially student loans related to higher education, and have longer life cycles, in some cases extending beyond 10 years.a more restrictive mortgage lending environment.

We introducemarket our homes to prospective buyers through media advertising, illustrated brochures, Internetinternet listings and link placements, mobile applications, and other advertising displays. We have made significant enhancements in our tools and business practices to adapt our selling efforts to today's mobile customers. In addition, our websites, www.pulte.com,

5



www.delwebb.com, and www.centex.com, provide tools to help users find a home that meets their needs, investigate financing alternatives, communicate moving plans, maintain a home, learn more about us, and communicate directly with us. There were approximately 8.09.6 million unique visits to our websites during 20122015, compared towith approximately 6.710.4 million in 2011.2014.

5



To meet the demands of our various customers, we have established design expertise for a wide array of product lines. We believe that we are an innovator in consumer-inspired home design, and we view our design capabilities as an integral aspect of our marketing strategy. Our in-house architectural services teams and management, supplemented by outside consultants, createfollow a 12-step product development process to introduce new features and technologies based on customer-validated data. Following this disciplined process results in distinctive design features, both in exterior facades and interior options and features. We typically offer a variety of potential options and upgrades, such as different flooring, countertop, and appliance choices, and design our base house and option packages to meet the needs of our customers as defined through rigorous market research. Energy efficiency represents an important source of value for new homes compared towith existing homes and represents a key area of focus for our home designs, including high efficiency HVAC systems and insulation, low-emissivity windows, solar power in certain geographies, and other energy-efficient features.

Typically, our sales teams, in some cases together with outside sales brokers, are responsible for guiding the customer through the sales process. We are committed to industry-leading customer service through a variety of quality initiatives, including our customer care program, which ensures that homeowners are comfortable at every stage of the building process. Fully furnished and landscaped model homes physically located in our communities are generally used to showcase our homes and their distinctive design features.

Construction

The construction of our homes is conducted under the supervision of our on-site construction field managers. Substantially all of our construction work is performed by independent subcontractors under contracts that, in many instances, cover both labor and materials on a fixed-price basis. Using a selective process, we have teamed up with what we believe are premier subcontractors and suppliers to improvedeliver all aspects of the house construction process.

Continuous improvement in our house construction process is a key area of focus. We seek to maintain efficient construction operations by using standard materials and components from a variety of sources and by utilizing standard construction practices, including lean production principles. Beginning in 2011, we implemented an intensive effort to improvepractices. We are improving our product offerings and production processes through the following programs:

New product development to introduce new features and technologies based on customer validated data;
Common management of house plans in order to focus on building those house designs that customers value the most and that can be built at the highest quality and at an efficient cost;
Value engineering our house plans to optimize house designs in terms of material content and ease of constructabilityconstruction while still providing a clear value to the consumercustomer (value engineering eliminates items that add cost but that have little to no value to the customer);
Improving our usage of Pulte Construction Standards, a proprietary system of internally required construction practices, through development of new or revised standards, training of our field leadership and construction personnel, communication with our suppliers, and auditing our compliance; and
Working with our suppliers to establish the "should cost", a data driven, collaborative effort to reduce construction costs to what the associated construction activities or materials “should cost” in the market.

The availability of labor and materials at reasonable prices is becominghas become an increasingincreased concern for certain trades and building materials in some markets as the supply chain respondsadjusts to uneven industry growth. Additionally, the cost of certain building materials, especially lumber, steel, concrete, copper, and petroleum-based materials, is influenced by changes in global commodity prices. To minimize the effects of changes in construction costs, the contracting and purchasing of building supplies and materials generally is negotiated at or near the time when related sales contracts are signed.signed with customers. In addition, we leverage our size by actively negotiating for certain materials on a national or regional basis to minimize production component cost. We are also working to establish a more integrated system that can effectively link suppliers, contractors, and the production schedule. However, we cannot determine the extent to which necessary building materials and labor will be available at reasonable prices in the future.


6



Competition

The housing industry in the United StatesU.S. is fragmented and highly competitive. While we are one of the largest homebuilders in the U.S., our national market share represented only 5%approximately 3% of U.S. new home sales in 20122015. In each of our local markets, there are numerous national, regional, and local homebuilders with whom we compete. Additionally, new home sales have traditionally representrepresented less than 15% of overall U.S. home sales (new and existing homes). Therefore, we also compete with sales of existing house inventory and any provider of housing units, for sale or to rent,rental housing units, including apartment operators, may be considered a competitor. Conversion of apartments to condominiums further provides an alternative to traditional housing, as does manufactured housing.operators. We compete primarily on the basis of location, price, quality, reputation, design, community amenities, and our customers' overall sales and homeownership experiences.


6



Seasonality

OurAlthough significant changes in market conditions have impacted our seasonal patterns in the past and could do so again, we historically experience variability in our quarterly results from operations due to the seasonal nature of the homebuilding operating cycle historically reflected increasedindustry. We generally experience increases in revenues profitability, and cash flow from operations during the fourth quarter based on the timing of home closings. WhileThis seasonal activity increases our working capital requirements in our third and fourth quarters to support our home production and loan origination volumes. As a result of the challenging market conditions experienced in recent years lessened the seasonal variationsseasonality of our operations, our quarterly results we have experienced a return to a more traditional demand pattern as new orders were higher in the first halfof operations are not necessarily indicative of the year and home closings increased in each quarter throughoutresults that may be expected for the full year. If and when the homebuilding industry more fully recovers from the recent downturn, we believe these traditional seasonal patterns will continue.

Regulation and environmental matters

Our operations are subject to extensive regulations imposed and enforced by various federal, state, and local governing authorities. These regulations are complex and include building codes, land zoning and other entitlement restrictions, health and safety regulations, labor practices, marketing and sales practices, environmental regulations, rules and regulations relating to mortgage financing and title operations, and various other laws, rules, and regulations. Collectively, these regulations have a significant impact on the site selection and development of our communities, our house design and construction techniques, our relationships with customers, employees, and suppliers / subcontractors, and many other aspects of our business. The applicable governing authorities frequently have broad discretion in administering these regulations, including inspections of our homes prior to closing with the customer in the majority of municipalities in which we operate.

Financial Services Operations

We conduct our financial services business, which includes mortgage and title operations, through Pulte Mortgage and other subsidiaries. Pulte Mortgage arranges financing through the origination of mortgage loans primarily for the benefit of our homebuyers. We are a lender approved by the FHA and VA and are a seller/servicer approved by Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae"), Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), and other investors. In our conventional mortgage lending activities, we follow underwriting guidelines established by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and private investors. We believe that our customers’ use of our in-house mortgage and title operations provides us with a competitive advantage by enabling more control over the quality of the overall home buying process for our customers while also helping us align the timing of the house construction process with our customers’ financing needs.

Operating as a captive business model primarily targeted to supporting our Homebuilding operations, the operating resultsbusiness levels of our Financial Services operations are highly correlated to Homebuilding. During 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, we originated mortgage loans for 67%65%, 61%, and 62%64%, respectively, of the homes we sold. Such originations represented substantially all of our total originations in each of those years. Our capture rate, which we define as loan originations from our homebuilding business as a percentage of total loan opportunities from our homebuilding business excluding cash settlements, was 82.9% in 81.9%2015, 80.2% in 20122014, 78.5%80.2% in 20112013, 81.9% in 2012, and 77.5%78.5% in 2010.2011.

In originating mortgage loans, we initially use our own funds, including funds available pursuant to credit agreements with third parties, and subsequently sell such mortgage loans to outside investors.third party investors in the secondary market. Substantially all of the loans we originate are sold in the secondary market within a short period of time after origination, generally within 30 days. We also sell the servicing rights for the loans we originate through fixed price servicing sales contracts to reduce the risks and costs inherent in servicing loans. This strategy results in owning the loans and related servicing rights for only a short period of time.


7



The mortgage industry in the United StatesU.S. is highly competitive. We compete with other mortgage companies and financial institutions to provide attractive mortgage financing to our homebuyers. We utilize a centralized fulfillment center staffed with loan consultants to performfor our mortgage operations that performs underwriting, processing, and closing functions. We believe centralizing both the fulfillment and origination of our loans improves the speed, efficiency, and quality of our mortgage operations, improving our profitability and allowing us to focus on providing attractive mortgage financing opportunities for our customers.

In originating and servicing mortgage loans, we are subject to the rules and regulations of the government-sponsored investors and other investors that purchase the loans we originate, as well as to those of other government agencies that have oversight of the government-sponsored investors or consumer lending rules in the U.S. In addition to being affected by changes in these programs, our mortgage banking business is also affected by many of the same factors that impact our homebuilding business.


7



Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans sold meetmet certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be at fault,faulty, we either repurchase the loansloan from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a "make-whole" payment). Historically, our overall losses related to this risk were not significant. Beginning in 2009, however, we experienced a significant increase in losses as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. Given the volatility in the mortgage industry and the uncertainty regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, it is reasonably possible that future losses may exceed our current estimates.

Our subsidiary title insurance companies serve as title insurance agents and underwriters in select markets by providing title insurance policies and examination and closing services to buyers of homes we sell. Historically, we have not experienced significant claims related to our title operations.

Financial Information About Geographic Areas

Substantially all of our operations are located within the United States. However, weU.S. We have some non-operating foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, which are insignificant to our consolidated financial results.

Organization/Employees

All subsidiaries and operating units operate independently with respect to daily operations. Homebuilding real estate purchases and other significant homebuilding, mortgage banking, financing activities, and similar operating decisions must be approved by the business unit’s management and/or corporate senior management.

At December 31, 20122015, we employed 3,6344,542 people, of which 697749 people were employed in our Financial Services operations. Except for a small group of employees in our St. Louis homebuilding division, our employees are not represented by any union. Contracted work, however, may be performed by union contractors. Our local and corporate management personnel are paid incentive compensation based on a combination of individual performance and the performance of the applicable business unit or the Company. Each business unit is given a level of autonomy regarding employment of personnel, althoughsubject to adherence to our established policies and procedures, and our senior corporate management acts in an advisory capacity in the employment of subsidiary officers. We consider our employee and contractor relations to be satisfactory.


8



ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS

Discussion of our business and operations included in this annual report on Form 10-K should be read together with the risk factors set forth below. They describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are, or may become, subject. These risks and uncertainties, together with other factors described elsewhere in this report, have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies, or prospects in a material and adverse manner.

Downward changes in general economic, real estate construction, or other business conditions could adversely affect our business or our financial results.

The residential homebuilding industry is sensitive to changes in economic conditions and other factors, such as the level of employment, consumer confidence, consumer income, availability of financing, and interest rate levels. Adverse changes in any of these conditions generally, or in the markets where we operate, could decrease demand and pricing for new homes in these areas or result in customer cancellations of pending contracts, which could adversely affect the number of home deliveries we make or reduce the prices we can charge for homes, either of which could result in a decrease in our revenues and earnings and would adversely affect our financial condition.

The homebuilding industry experienced a significant downturn in recent years.from 2006 through 2011. Although industry conditions improved duringbeginning in 2012, the overall U.S. economy, while improving, remains weakchallenged and the timing of a broad, sustainable recoveryconsumer demand in the homebuilding industry remains uncertain.volatile. A deterioration in industry conditions could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In recent years,Beginning in 2006 and continuing through 2011, the U.S. housing market was unfavorably impacted by severe weakness in new home sales attributable to, among other factors, weak consumer confidence, tightened mortgage standards, significant foreclosure activity, a more challenging appraisal environment, higher than normal unemployment levels, and significant uncertainty in the global economy. These conditions contributed to sharply weakened demand for new homes and heightened pricing pressures on new and existing home sales. As a result of these factors, we have experienced significant decreases in our revenues and profitability.profitability during the period 2007 - 2011. We have also incurred substantial impairments of our land inventory and certain other assets. During 2012,assets during this period. Since 2011, overall industry new home sales have increased, and we returned to profitability. However, the overall demand for new homes remains at lowbelow historical levels, and the timing of a broad, sustainable recovery in the homebuilding industry remains uncertain.levels. Accordingly, we can provide no assurances that the adjustments we have made in our operating strategy will be successful.

If the market value of our land and homes drops significantly, our profits could decrease.

The market value of land, building lots, and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions, and the measures we employ to manage inventory risk may not be adequate to insulate our operations from a severe drop in inventory values. We acquire land for expansion into new markets and for replacement of land inventory and expansion within our current markets. If housing demand decreases below what we anticipated when we acquired our inventory, we may not be able to make profits similar to what we have made in the past, we may experience less than anticipated profits, and/or we may not be able to recover our costs when we sell and build homes. When market conditions are such that land values are not appreciating, option arrangements previously entered into may become less desirable, at which time we may elect to forego deposits and pre-acquisition costs and terminate the agreement. In the face of adverse market conditions, we may have substantial inventory carrying costs, we may have to write down our inventory to its fair value, and/or we may have to sell land or homes at a loss.

As a resultSupply shortages and other risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for skilled labor and materials. Labor shortages in certain of our markets have become more acute in recent quarters as the supply chain adjusts to uneven industry growth. Additionally, the cost of certain building materials, especially lumber, steel, concrete, copper, and petroleum-based materials, is influenced by changes in local and global commodity prices. Increased costs or shortages of skilled labor and/or materials could cause increases in construction costs and / or construction delays. We may not be able to pass on increases in construction costs to customers and generally are unable to pass on any such increases to customers who have already entered into sales contracts as those sales contracts generally fix the price of the challenging market conditions inhome at the homebuilding industry, we have incurred significant land-related charges resulting fromtime the write-off of deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to land transactions we elected not to pursue, net realizable valuation adjustments related to land positions sold or held for sale, impairments on land assets related to communities under development or to be developed in the future, impairments of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and impairments of our recorded goodwill. Itcontract is reasonably possible that the estimated cash flows from our projects may change and could result in a future need to record additional valuation adjustments. Additionally, if conditions in the homebuilding industry or our local markets worsen in the future or if our strategy related to certain communities changes, wesigned, which may be requiredwell in advance of the construction of the home. Sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our margins, and pricing competition may restrict our ability to evaluatepass on any such additional costs, thereby decreasing our assets for additional impairments or write-downs, which could result in additional charges that might be significant.margins.


9



Our success depends on our ability to acquire land suitable for residential homebuilding at reasonable prices, in accordance with our land investment criteria.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for suitable land. The availability of finished and partially finished developed lots and undeveloped land for purchase that meet our internal criteria depends on a number of factors outside our control, including land availability in general, competition with other homebuilders and land buyers for desirable property, inflation in land prices, zoning, allowable housing density, and other regulatory requirements. Should suitable lots or land become less available, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell could be reduced, and the cost of land could be increased, perhaps substantially, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

Our long-term ability to build homes depends on our acquiring land suitable for residential building at reasonable prices in locations where we want to build. In the past, we experienced significant competition for suitable land as a result of land constraints in many of our markets. As competition for suitable land increases, and as available land is developed, the cost of acquiring suitable remaining land could rise, and the availability of suitable land at acceptable prices may decline. Any land shortages or any decrease in the supply of suitable land at reasonable prices could limit our ability to develop new communities or result in increased land costs. We may not be able to pass through to our customers any increased land costs, which could adversely impact our revenues, earnings, and margins.

We are subject to claims related to mortgage loans we sold in the secondary mortgage market that may be significant.

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to certain representations and warranties made by us that the loans sold meetmet certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the type of collateral, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan.  To date, the significant majority of these losses relate to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the origination market. We may also be required to indemnify underwriters that purchased and securitized loans originated by a former subsidiary of Centex for losses incurred by investors in those securitized loans based on similar breaches of representations and warranties.

To date, the significant majority of these losses relate to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the origination market. In 2006 and 2007, we originated $39.5 billion of loans, excluding loans originated by Centex's former subprime loan business sold by Centex in 2006.

In addition, we entered into an agreement in conjunction with the wind down of Centex’s mortgage operations, which ceased loan origination activities in December 2009, that provides a guaranty for one major investor of loans originated by Centex.  This guaranty provides that we will honor the potential repurchase obligations of Centex’s mortgage operations related to breaches of similar representations in the origination of a certain pool of loans.

The resolution of claims related to alleged breaches of these representations and warranties and repurchase claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, and could exceed existing estimates and accruals. The repurchase liability we recorded is estimated based on several factors, includingoperations. Given the level of current unresolved repurchase requests, the volume of estimated probable future repurchase requests, our ability to cure the defects identifiedongoing volatility in the repurchase requests, and the severitymortgage industry, changes in values of the estimated loss upon repurchase.  The factors referred to above are subject to change in light of market developments, the economic environment,underlying collateral over time, and other circumstances, someuncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of which are beyondthese claims, actual costs could differ from our control.current estimates. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such reserves will not need to be increased in the future.

10



Future increases in interest rates, reductions in mortgage availability, or other increases in the effective costs of owning a home could prevent potential customers from buying our homes and adversely affect our business and financial results.

A large majority of our customers finance their home purchases through mortgage loans, many through our mortgage bank. Interest rates have been near historical lows for several years, which has made new homes more affordable. Increases in interest rates or decreases in the availability of mortgage financing however, could reduceadversely affect the market for new homes. Potential homebuyers may be less willing or able to pay the increased monthly costs or to obtain mortgage financing that exposes them to interest rate changes.financing. Lenders may increase the qualifications needed for mortgages or adjust their terms to address any increased credit risk. Even if potential customers do not need financing, changes in interest rates and mortgage availability could make it harder for them to sell their current homes to potential buyers who need financing. These factors could adversely affect the sales or pricing of our homes and could also reduce the volume or margins in our financial services business. Our financial services business could also be impacted to the extent we are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate through the various hedging strategies we employ. These developments have had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on the overall demand for new housing and thereby on the results of operations for our homebuilding business.

In addition, the Federal Reserve has purchased a sizeable amount of mortgage-backed securities in part to stabilize mortgage interest rates and to support the market for mortgage-backed securities. As the Federal Reserve reduces its holdings of mortgage-backed securities over time, the availability and affordability of mortgage loans, including the consumer interest rates for such loans, could be adversely affected.

We also believe that the availability of FHA and VA mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing some of our homes. The FHA has and may continue to impose stricter loan qualification standards, raise minimum down payment requirements, impose higher mortgage insurance premiums and other costs, and/or limit the number of mortgages it insures. The liquidity provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the mortgage industry is also critical to the housing market. The impact of the federal government’s conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the short-term and long-term demand for new housing remains unclear. Any limitations or restrictions on the availability of financing by these agencies could adversely affect interest rates, mortgage financing, and our sales of new homes and mortgage loans.

Significant costs of homeownership include mortgageMortgage interest expense and real estate taxes represent significant costs of homeownership, both of which are generally deductible for an individual’s federal and, in some cases, state income taxes. Any changes to income tax laws by the

10



federal government or a state government to eliminate or substantially reduce these income tax deductions, as has been considered from time to time, would increase the after-tax cost of owning a home. Increases in real estate taxes by local governmental authorities also increase the cost of homeownership. Any such increases to the cost of homeownership could adversely impact the demand for and sales prices of new homes.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our access to capital and cost of capital.

The capital and credit markets have experiencedcan experience significant volatility in recent years. In many cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on the availability of liquidity and credit capacity for issuers.volatility. We may need credit-related liquidity for the future growth and development of our business. Without sufficient liquidity, we may not be able to purchase additional land or develop land, which could adversely affect our financial results. At December 31, 2012,2015, we had cash and equivalents of $1.4 billion as well as$754.2 million, restricted cash totaling $72.0$21.3 million,. and $308.7 million available under our revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit. However, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient, and in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Another source of liquidity includes our ability to use letters of credit and surety bonds pursuant to certain performance-related obligations and as security for certain land option agreements and under various insurance programs. The majority of these letters of credit and surety bonds are in support of our land development and construction obligations to various municipalities, other government agencies, and utility companies related to the construction of roads, sewers, and other infrastructure. At December 31, 20122015, we had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds totaling $179.2$191.3 million and $1.0$1.0 billion,, respectively. Of these amounts outstanding, $54.5 million of theThese letters of credit were subject to cash-collateralized agreements while the remaining letters ofare issued via our unsecured revolving credit facility, which contains certain financial covenants and surety bonds were unsecured.other limitations. If we are unable to obtain letters of credit or surety bonds when required, or the conditions imposed by issuers increase significantly, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

11



Competition for homebuyers could reduce our deliveries or decrease our profitability.

The U.S. housing industry in the United States is highly competitive. We compete primarily on the basis of location, price, quality, reputation, design, community amenities, and our customers' overall sales and homeownership experiences. We compete in each of our markets with numerous national, regional, and local homebuilders. This competition with other homebuilders could reduce the number of homes we deliver or cause us to accept reduced margins in order to maintain sales volume.

We also compete with resales of existing or foreclosed homes, housing speculators, and available rental housing. Increased competitive conditions in the residential resale or rental market in the regions where we operate could decrease demand for new homes or unfavorably impact pricing for new homes.

Supply shortages and other risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for skilled labor and materials. Additionally, the cost of certain building materials, especially lumber, steel, concrete, copper, and petroleum-based materials, is influenced by changes in global commodity prices. Increased costs or shortages of skilled labor and/or materials could cause increases in construction costs and construction delays. We may not be able to pass on increases in construction costs to customers and generally are unable to pass on any such increases to customers who have already entered into sales contracts as those sales contracts generally fix the price of the home at the time the contract is signed, which may be well in advance of the construction of the home. Sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our margins, and pricing competition for materials and labor may restrict our ability to pass on any such additional costs, thereby decreasing our margins.

Our income tax provision and tax reserves may be insufficient if a taxing authority is successful in asserting positions that are contrary to our interpretations and related reserves, if any.

Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and our reserves for federal, state, and local taxes. In the ordinary course of business, there may be matters for which the ultimate outcome is uncertain. Our evaluation of our tax matters is based on a number of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of audits, and effective settlement of audit issues. Although we believe our approach to determining the tax treatment for such items is appropriate, no assurance can be given that the final tax authority review will not be materially different than that which is reflected in our income tax provision and related tax reserves. Such differences could have a material adverse effect on our income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made and, consequently, on our financial position, cash flows, or net income for such period.

We are periodically audited by various federal, state, and local authorities regarding tax matters. Our current audits are in various stages of completion; however, no outcome for a particular audit can be determined with certainty prior to the conclusion of the audit, appeal, and, in some cases, litigation process. As each audit is concluded, adjustments, if any, are recorded in our financial statements in the period determined. To provide for potential tax exposures, we maintain tax reserves based on reasonable estimatesconsider a variety of potentialfactors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and effective settlement of audit results.issues. If these reserves are insufficient upon completion of an audit, there could be an adverse impact on our financial position, cash flows, and results of operations.


11



We may not realize our deferred income tax assets.

As of December 31, 2015, we had deferred income tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, of $1.5 billion, against which we provided a valuation allowance of $109.1 million. The ultimate realization of our deferred income tax assets is dependent upon generating future taxable income and executing tax planning strategies. WeWhile we have recorded valuation allowances against certain of our deferred income tax assets. Theassets, the valuation allowance will fluctuateallowances are subject to change as conditionsfacts and circumstances change.

Our ability to utilize net operating losses (“NOLs”), built-in losses (“BILs”), and tax credit carryforwards to offset our future taxable income would be limited if we were to undergo an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”). In general, an “ownership change” occurs whenever the percentage of the stock of a corporation owned by “5-percent shareholders” (within the meaning of Section 382 of the IRC) increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of the stock of such corporation owned by such “5-percent shareholders” at any time over the testing period.

12



An ownership change under Section 382 of the IRC would establish an annual limitation to the amount of NOLs, BILs, and tax credit carryforwards we could utilize to offset our taxable income in any single year. The application of these limitations might prevent full utilization of the deferred tax assets attributable to our NOLs, BILs, and tax credit carryforwards. We have not experienced an ownership change as defined by Section 382. To preserve our ability to utilize NOLs, BILs, and other tax benefits in the future without a Section 382 limitation, we adopted a shareholder rights plan, which is triggered upon certain transfers of our securities, and amended our by-laws to prohibit certain transfers of our securities. Our shareholder rights plan expires June 1, 2016, unless our board of directors and shareholders approve an amendment to extend the term prior thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing measures, there can be no assurance that we will not undergo an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382.

As a result of theour merger with Centex in August 2009, our ability to use certain of Centex’s pre-ownership change NOLs, BILs, and deductions is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The applicable Section 382 limitation is approximately $67.4 million per year for NOLs, losses realized on built-in loss assets that are sold within 60 months of the ownership change (i.e. before August 2014), and certain deductions.IRC. We do not believe that the Section 382 limitation will prevent the Companyus from using Centex's pre-ownership change NOL carryforwards and built-in lossesfederal NOLs, BILs, or deductions.deductions, however, no assurance can be given that any such limitation will not occur, which could be material.

The value of our deferred tax assets is also dependent upon the tax rates expected to be in effect at the time taxable income is expected to be generated. A decrease in enacted corporate tax rates in our major jurisdictions, especially the U.S. federal corporate tax rate, would decrease the value of our deferred tax assets, which could be material.

We have significant intangible assets. If these assets become impaired, then our profits and shareholders’ equity may be reduced.

We have significant intangible assets related to prior business combinations. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets whenever facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of intangible assets is deemed impaired, the carrying value is written down to fair value. This would result in a charge to our operating earnings. If management’s expectations of future results and cash flows decrease significantly, impairments of the remaining intangible assets may occur.

Government regulations could increase the cost and limit the availability of our development and homebuilding projects or affect our related financial services operations and adversely affect our business or financial results.

Our operations are subject to building, environmental, and other regulations imposed and enforced by various federal, state, and local governing authorities. New housing developments may also be subject to various assessments for schools, parks, streets, and other public improvements. These can cause an increase in the effective cost of our homes.

We also are subject to a variety of local, state, and federal laws and regulations concerning protection of health, safety, and the environment. The impact of environmental laws varies depending upon the prior uses of the building site or adjoining properties and may be greater in areas with less supply where undeveloped land or desirable alternatives are less available. These matters may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation and other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas. More stringent requirements could be imposed in the future on homebuilders and developers, thereby increasing the cost of compliance.

Our financial services operations are also subject to numerous federal, state, and local laws and regulations. These include eligibility requirements for participation in federal loan programs and compliance with consumer lending and similar

12



requirements such as disclosure requirements, prohibitions against discrimination, and real estate settlement procedures. They also subject our operations to examination by applicable agencies, pursuant to which those agencies may limit our ability to provide mortgage financing or title services to potential purchasers of our homes. For our homes to qualify for FHA or VA mortgages, we must satisfy valuation standards and site, material, and construction requirements of those agencies.

OnIn January 10, 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") adopted new rules regarding the origination of mortgages, including the criteria for “qualified mortgages”. The new, rules are scheduledfor lender practices regarding assessing borrowers’ ability to gorepay, and limitations on certain fees and incentive arrangements. Such rules went into effect in January 2014. We areThe CFPB also issued the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure ("TRID") rules, which combined the mortgage disclosures consumers receive under the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA") and the process of analyzingReal Estate Settlement and Procedures Act ("RESPA"). Such rules went into effect in October 2015. While we have adjusted our operations to comply with the new rules, and the impact such rules will have on our business.business remains unclear. Additionally, manycertain other rules required by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 have not yet been completed or implemented, which has created uncertainty in the overall U.S. financial services and mortgage industries as to their long-term impact.

13



Homebuilding is subject to warranty and other claims in the ordinary course of business that can be significant.

As a homebuilder, we are subject to home warranty, construction defect, and other claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We record warranty and other reserves for the homes we sell based on historical experience in our markets and our judgment of the qualitative risks associated with the types of homes built. We have, and require our subcontractors to have, general liability, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and available policy limits. In certain instances, we may offer our subcontractors the opportunity to purchase insurance through one of our captive insurance subsidiaries or participate in a project-specific insurance program provided by us. Policies issued by our captive insurance subsidiaries represent self-insurance of these risks by us. We reserve for costs to cover our self-insured and deductible amounts under these policies and for any costs of claims and lawsuits based on an analysis of our historical claims, which includes an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Because of the uncertainties inherent in these matters, we cannot provide assurance that our insurance coverage, our subcontractor arrangements, and our reserves will be adequate to address all our warranty and construction defect claims in the future. Contractual indemnities can be difficult to enforce, we may be responsible for applicable self-insured retentions, and some types of claims may not be covered by insurance or may exceed applicable coverage limits. Additionally, the coverage offered by and the availability of general liability insurance for construction defects are currently costly and limited. We have responded to the recent increases in insurance costs and coverage limitations by increasing our self-insured retentions and claim reserves. There can be no assurance that coverage will not be further restricted andor become more costly. Additionally, we are exposed to counterparty default risk related to our subcontractors, our insurance carriers, and our subcontractors’ insurance carriers.

Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could delay deliveries, increase costs, and decrease demand for new homes in affected areas.

Our homebuilding operations are located in many areas that are subject to natural disasters and severe weather. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can delay new home deliveries, increase costs by damaging inventories, reduce the availability of materials, and negatively impact the demand for new homes in affected areas. Furthermore, if our insurance does not fully cover business interruptions or losses resulting from these events, our earnings, liquidity, or capital resources could be adversely affected.

Inflation may result in increased costs that we may not be able to recoup.

Inflation can have a long-term impact on us because increasing costs of land, materials, and labor may require us to increase the sales prices of homes in order to maintain satisfactory margins. However, we may not be able to raise home prices sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation and our margins could decrease. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which could have a negative impact on housing demand.

Information technology failures or data security breaches could harm our business.
We use information technology and other computer resources to carry out important operational activities and to maintain our business records. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches (through cyber-attackscyberattacks from computer hackers and sophisticated organizations), catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes and hurricanes, and usage

13



errors by our associates. If our computer systems and our back-up systems are damaged, breached, or cease to function properly, we could suffer interruptions in our operations or unintentionally allow misappropriation of proprietary or confidential information (including information about our homebuyers and business partners), which could require us to incur significant costs to remediate or otherwise resolve these issues.

Future terrorist attacks against the United States or increased domestic and international instability could have an adverse effect on our operations.

A future terrorist attack against the U.S. could cause a sharp decrease in the number of new contracts signed for homes and an increase in the cancellation of existing contracts. Accordingly, adverse developments in the war on terrorism, future terrorist attacks against the U.S., or increased domestic and international instability could adversely affect our business.



14



ITEM 1B.     UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES

Our homebuilding and corporate headquarters are located in leased office facilities at 100 Bloomfield Hills Parkway, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304.3350 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 150, Atlanta, GA 30326. Pulte Mortgage leases its primary office facilities in Englewood, Colorado, and weColorado. We also maintain various support functions in leased facilities near Phoenix, Arizona.in Tempe, Arizona and Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. Our homebuilding divisions and financial services branches lease office space in the geographic locations in which they conduct their day-to-day operations.

Because of the nature of our homebuilding operations, significant amounts of property are held as inventory in the ordinary course. Such properties are not included in response to this Item.

ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various legal and governmental proceedings incidental to our continuing business operations, many involving claims related to certain construction defects. The consequences of these matters are not presently determinable but, in our opinion, after consulting with legal counsel and taking into account insurance and reserves, the ultimate liability is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. However, to the extent the liability arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds our estimates reflected in the recorded reserves relating to such matter, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.

ITEM 4.     MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

This Item is not applicable.



1514



ITEM 4A.        EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below is certain information with respect to our executive officers.
Name Age Position 
Year Became
An Executive Officer
 Age Position 
Year Became
An Executive Officer
Richard J. Dugas, Jr. 47 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 2002 50 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 2002
Robert T. O'Shaughnessy 47 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2011 50 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2011
James R. Ellinghausen 57 Executive Vice President, Human Resources 2005
Harmon D. Smith 49 
Executive Vice President - Homebuilding Operations and Area
   President, Texas
 2011 52 Executive Vice President, Field Operations 2011
James R. Ellinghausen 54 Executive Vice President, Human Resources 2005
Deborah W. Meyer 50 Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer 2009
Ryan R. Marshall 41 Executive Vice President, Homebuilding Operations 2012
Steven M. Cook 54 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 2006 57 Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary 2006
Stephen P. Schlageter 42 Area President, Northeast 2012
Ryan R. Marshall 38 Area President, Southeast 2012
Patrick J. Beirne 49 Area President, Central 2011
John J. Chadwick 51 Area President, Southwest 2012
Michael J. Schweninger 44 Vice President and Controller 2009
James L. Ossowski 47 Vice President, Finance and Controller 2013
The following is a brief account of the business experience of each officer during the past five years:
Mr. Dugas was appointed Chairman in August 2009 and President and Chief Executive Officer in July 2003. Previously, he was appointed Chief Operating Officer in May 2002 and Executive Vice President in December 2002. Since joining our company in 1994, he has served in a variety of management positions.
Mr. O'Shaughnessy was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in May 2011. Prior to joining our company, he held a number of financial roles at Penske Automotive Group from 1997 to 2011, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Ellinghausen was appointed Executive Vice President, Human Resources in December 2006.
Mr. Smith was appointed Executive Vice President, -Field Operations in May 2014 and previously held the position of Executive Vice President, Homebuilding Operations and Area President, Texas insince May 2012, and previously held the position of Area President, Gulf Coast since 2008.2012. He has served as an Area President over various geographical markets since 2006.
Mr. EllinghausenMarshall was appointed Executive Vice President, Human ResourcesHomebuilding Operations in DecemberMay 2014. Previously he held the positions of Area President, Southeast since November 2012, Area President, Florida since May 2012, and Division President, South Florida since 2006.
Ms. Meyer was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer in September 2009. Prior to joining our company, Ms. Meyer held various senior marketing positions, most recently serving as Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer for Chrysler, LLC from August 2007 to December 2008.
Mr. Cook was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in September 2015 and previously held the positions of Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary insince December 2008 and previously held the position of Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since February 2006.
Mr. SchlageterOssowski was appointed AreaVice President, NortheastFinance and Controller in November 2012February 2013 and previously held the positionsposition of Vice President, Finance - Strategic PlanningHomebuilding Operations since October 2010 and Division President - Raleigh since November 2003.
August 2010. Since 2002, Mr. Marshall was appointed Area President, Southeast in November 2012 and previouslyOssowski has held thevarious finance positions of Area President, Florida since May 2012 and Division President - South Florida since 2006.
Mr. Beirne was appointed Area President, Central in 2012 and has served as an Area President over various geographical markets since 2006.
Mr. Chadwick was appointed Area President, Southwest in 2012 and previously served as Division President - Arizona. Since 2006, Mr. Chadwick has held the position of Area President or Division President over various geographical markets.
Mr. Schweninger was appointed Vice President and Controller effective March 2009. Since joiningincreasing responsibility with our company in 2005, he also has held the positions of Director – Finance & Accounting Process Improvement and Director of Corporate Audit.company.
There is no family relationship between any of the officers. Each officer serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.


1615



PART II
 
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Symbol: PHM).

Related Stockholder Matters

The table below sets forth, for the quarterly periods indicated, the range of high and low closingintraday sales prices for our common shares.shares and dividend per share information:
 
December 31, 2012December 31, 2011December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
High Low High LowHigh Low Declared
Dividend
 High Low Declared
Dividend
1st Quarter$9.61
 $6.52
 $8.69
 $6.54
$23.24
 $20.56
 $0.08
 $21.65
 $18.21
 $0.05
2nd Quarter10.70
 7.69
 8.44
 6.93
22.78
 18.85
 0.08
 20.47
 18.01
 0.05
3rd Quarter16.98
 10.02
 7.84
 3.61
22.02
 18.72
 0.08
 20.64
 17.47
 0.05
4th Quarter18.61
 15.24
 6.48
 3.54
20.21
 17.18
 0.09
 22.03
 16.56
 0.08

At February 1, 20132016, there were 2,9832,617 shareholders of record. No dividends were declared during 2012 or 2011.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
(a)
Total number
of shares
purchased
(b)
Average
price paid
per share
(c)
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
(d)
Approximate dollar
value of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans or
programs
($000’s omitted)
October 1, 2012 to October 31, 2012


102,342(1)
November 1, 2012 to November 30, 2012


102,342(1)
December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
$

102,342(1)
Total
$

 
(a)
Total number
of shares
purchased
 
(b)
Average
price paid
per share
 
(c)
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
 
(d)
Approximate dollar
value of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans or
programs
($000’s omitted)
 
October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2015
 $
 
 $304,765
(1)
November 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015
 
 
 $304,765
(1)
December 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015
 
 
 $604,765
(1)
Total
 $
 
   
 

(1)
Pursuant to $100 million stock repurchase programs authorized and announced by ourThe Board of Directors approved share repurchase authorizations totaling $750.0 million and $300.0 million in October 20022014 and October 2005 and a $200December 2015, respectively, of which $604.8 million stock repurchase authorized and announced in February 2006 (for a total stock repurchase authorization remained available as of $400 million), the Company has repurchased a total of 9,688,900 shares for a total of $297.7 million.December 31, 2015. There are no expiration dates for thethese programs.
During 2015, we repurchased 21.2 million shares under these programs.

The information required by this item with respect to equity compensation plans is set forth under Item 12 of this annual report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

1716



Performance Graph

The following line graph compares for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20082011, 20092012, 20102013, 20112014, and 20122015 (a) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return (i.e., the change in share price plus the cumulative amount of dividends, assuming dividend reinvestment, divided by the initial share price, expressed as a percentage) on PulteGroup’s common shares, with (b) the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, and with (c) the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. The Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index is a widely-recognized index comprised primarily of large national homebuilders. We believe comparison of our shareholder return to this index represents a meaningful analysis for investors.

COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG PULTEGROUP, INC., S&P 500 INDEX, AND PEER INDEX
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20122015


 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
PULTEGROUP, INC. 100.00
 105.06
 96.12
 72.28
 60.65
 174.56
 100.00
 83.91
 241.49
 272.87
 290.55
 245.74
S&P 500 Index - Total Return 100.00
 63.00
 79.68
 91.68
 93.61
 108.60
 100.00
 102.11
 118.45
 156.82
 178.28
 180.75
Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction
Index
 100.00
 59.79
 61.67
 68.55
 62.72
 112.70
 100.00
 91.50
 164.40
 194.66
 204.68
 215.83

* Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 20072010, and the reinvestment of dividends.

1817



ITEM 6.      SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Set forth below is selected consolidated financial data for each of the past five fiscal years. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Years Ended December 31,
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
2012 2011 2010 
2009 (a)
 20082015 2014 2013 2012 2011
OPERATING DATA:                  
Homebuilding:                  
Revenues$4,659,110
 $4,033,596
 $4,447,627
 $3,966,589
 $6,112,038
$5,841,211
 $5,696,725
 $5,538,644
 $4,659,110
 $4,033,596
Income (loss) before income taxes$157,991
 $(275,830) $(1,240,155) $(1,920,081) $(1,710,644)$757,317
 $635,177
 $479,113
 $157,991
 $(275,830)
Financial Services:                  
Revenues$160,888
 $103,094
 $121,663
 $117,800
 $151,016
$140,753
 $125,638
 $140,951
 $160,888
 $103,094
Income (loss) before income taxes$25,563
 $(34,470) $5,609
 $(55,038) $28,045
$58,706
 $54,581
 $48,709
 $25,563
 $(34,470)
                  
Consolidated results:                  
Revenues$4,819,998
 $4,136,690
 $4,569,290
 $4,084,389
 $6,263,054
$5,981,964
 $5,822,363
 $5,679,595
 $4,819,998
 $4,136,690
                  
Income (loss) before income taxes$183,554
 $(310,300) $(1,234,546) $(1,975,119) $(1,682,599)$816,023
 $689,758
 $527,822
 $183,554
 $(310,300)
Income tax expense (benefit)(22,591) (99,912) (137,817) (792,552) (209,486)321,933
 215,420
 (2,092,294) (22,591) (99,912)
Net income (loss)$206,145
 $(210,388) $(1,096,729) $(1,182,567) $(1,473,113)$494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388)
                  
PER SHARE DATA:                  
Net income (loss) per share:                  
Basic$0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90) $(3.94) $(5.81)$1.38
 $1.27
 $6.79
 $0.54
 $(0.55)
Diluted$0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90) $(3.94) $(5.81)$1.36
 $1.26
 $6.72
 $0.54
 $(0.55)
Number of shares used in calculation:                  
Basic381,562
 379,877
 378,585
 300,179
 253,512
356,576
 370,377
 383,077
 381,562
 379,877
Effect of dilutive securities3,002
 
 
 
 
3,217
 3,725
 3,789
 3,002
 
Diluted384,564
 379,877
 378,585
 300,179
 253,512
359,793
 374,102
 386,866
 384,564
 379,877
Shareholders’ equity$5.66
 $5.07
 $5.59
 $8.39
 $10.98
$13.63
 $13.01
 $12.19
 $5.66
 $5.07
Cash dividends declared$
 $
 $
 $
 $0.16
$0.33
 $0.23
 $0.15
 $
 $

(a)
Includes operations of Centex Corporation since August 18, 2009.


1918



December 31,
($000’s omitted)
December 31,
($000’s omitted)
2012 2011 2010 
2009 (a)
 20082015 2014 2013 2012 2011
BALANCE SHEET DATA:                  
House and land inventory$4,214,046
 $4,636,468
 $4,781,813
 $4,940,358
 $4,201,289
$5,450,058
 $4,392,100
 $3,978,561
 $4,214,046
 $4,636,468
Total assets6,734,409
 6,885,620
 7,699,376
 10,051,222
 7,708,458
8,967,160
 8,569,410
 8,734,143
 6,734,409
 6,885,620
Senior notes2,509,613
 3,088,344
 3,391,668
 4,281,532
 3,166,305
Senior notes and term loan2,084,769
 1,818,561
 2,058,168
 2,509,613
 3,088,344
Shareholders’ equity2,189,616
 1,938,615
 2,135,167
 3,194,440
 2,835,698
4,759,325
 4,804,954
 4,648,952
 2,189,616
 1,938,615
                  
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2010 
2009 (a)
 20082015 2014 2013 2012 2011
OTHER DATA:                  
Markets, at year-end58
 61
 67
 69
 49
50
 49
 48
 58
 61
Active communities, at year-end670
 700
 786
 882
 572
620
 598
 577
 670
 700
Closings (units)16,505
 15,275
 17,095
 15,013
 21,022
17,127
 17,196
 17,766
 16,505
 15,275
Net new orders (units)19,039
 15,215
 15,148
 14,185
 15,306
18,008
 16,652
 17,080
 19,039
 15,215
Backlog (units), at year-end6,458
 3,924
 3,984
 5,931
 2,174
6,731
 5,850
 5,772
 6,458
 3,924
Average selling price (per unit)$276,000
 $259,000
 $259,000
 $258,000
 $284,000
$338,000
 $329,000
 $305,000
 $276,000
 $259,000
Gross margin from home sales (b)(a)
15.8% 12.8% 9.4% (10.5)% (10.1)%23.3% 23.3% 20.5% 15.8% 12.8%

 (a)
Includes operations of Centex Corporation since August 18, 2009.
(b)Homebuilding interest expense, which represents the amortization of capitalized interest, and land and community valuation adjustmentsimpairment charges are included in home sale cost of revenues.


2019



ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

In 2012, new home salesImproved demand conditions in the overall U.S. housing market continued through 2015. While heightened global economic concerns have created greater volatility in financial markets, the positive trends in the U.S. increasedregarding jobs, demographics and household formations, low interest rates, and a generally balanced inventory of homes available for the first time since 2005. Although this volume remains very low comparedsale support our expectations that housing demand continues to move higher at a measured pace for a number of years. These conditions have helped keep monthly mortgage payments affordable relative to historical levels and the improvedrental market. This environment and our restructuring actions contributed to our return to profitabilityexperiencing relatively stable overall demand in 2012 as2015, including 8% growth in net new orders, closings,a 2% increase in home sale revenues to $5.8 billion, and maintaining gross margin,margins at 23.3%, among the highest annual gross margins reported in the Company's history.
The nature of the homebuilding industry results in a lag between when investments made in land acquisition and overhead leverage all improveddevelopment yield new community openings and related home closings. During 2015, we opened approximately 200 new communities across our existing local markets, which represented a sizable increase compared with 2011. Duringrecent years as a result of increased land investment over the year,last few years. These new communities generally replaced older communities that closed out in 2015 as our netoverall active community count increased 4%. While we have experience opening new orders increased 25% over 2011 from 4% fewer active communities. We also generated significant positive operating cash flow, highlighting somecommunities, this volume of new community openings presents a challenge in today's environment where entitlement and land development delays are common. The difficult weather conditions in certain parts of the benefitsU.S. in the first half of 2015 contributed to that challenge. Additionally, labor constraints in the construction industry have led to delays in home closings, which contributed to our effortsclosing volume being flat compared with the prior year. Leveraging our increased land investments, we expect to improveopen an even higher number of new communities in 2016 than we did in 2015, which we expect will help our capital efficiency. By usingvolume to grow in 2016. In addition, we acquired substantially all of the assets of JW Homes, including the brand John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, in January 2016, which will also contribute to growth in 2016.
Our financial position provided flexibility to increase our existing land assets more efficiently, allocating capital more effectively,investments in future communities while also returning funds to shareholders through dividends and controlling unsold ("spec") inventory,expanded share repurchases. Specifically, we continued to enhance our balance sheet and positionaccomplished the Company to deliver higher long-term returns.following in 2015:

WhileIncreased our land investment spending by 30% to support future growth;
Repurchased $433.7 million of shares under our share repurchase plan and authorized an additional $300.0 million for future repurchases;
Raised our quarterly dividend from $0.08 to $0.09 per share;
Maintained one of the timinglowest ratios of a broad, sustainable recoverydebt to total capitalization in the homebuilding industry remains uncertain, we believe thatat 30.5%; and
Ended the year with a cash balance of $754.2 million with no borrowings outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit agreement.
Industry-wide new home sales continue to pace well below historical averages, so we remain optimistic that demand is moving along a path toward recovery. The valuecan continue to increase in new housing resulting from affordable prices,the coming years. We believe the positive factors of an improving economy with rising employment, continued low mortgage rates, escalating rents, and more energy-efficient homes is providing consumers with a compelling reason to buy a new home, especially relative to the ever more expensive rental market and the tightened supply of available existing homes. In the short term, we believe that 2013beneficial long-term demographic trends will be a better year for U.S. housing than 2012 in spite of continued high levels of unemployment and related low levels of consumer confidence, a challenging U.S. macroeconomic environment, and potential regulatory reforms that may impact the housing and mortgage industries. In the long term, we continue to believe that the national publicly-traded builders will havesupport a competitive advantage over local builders through their abilityslow and sustained housing recovery. Within this environment, we remain focused on driving additional gains in construction and asset efficiency to leverage economies of scale at a local level, accessdeliver higher returns on invested capital. Consistent with our positive market view and long-term business strategy, we expect to more reliable and lower cost financing through theuse our capital markets, ability to control and entitle large land positions, and greater geographic and product diversification. Among the national publicly-traded peer group, we believe that builders with more significant land positions, broad geographic and product diversity, and sustainable capital positions will benefit as market conditions recover. We continuesupport future growth while consistently returning funds to focus on our primary operational objectives:shareholders.

Improving our inventory turns;
More effectively allocating the capital invested in our business using a risk-based portfolio approach;
Enhancing revenues through more strategic pricing, including establishing clear business models for each of our brands based on systematic, consumer-driven input, optimizing our pricing through the expanded use of options and lot premiums, and lessening our reliance on spec home sales;
Reducing our house costs through common house plan management, value-engineering our house plans, and working with suppliers to reduce costs; and
Maintaining an efficient overhead structure.

Continued focus on these operational objectives, combined with improvements in industry conditions, have resulted in a return to profitability in our homebuilding operations and an increase in profits in our financial services businesses.

2120



The following is a summary of our operating results by line of business ($000's omitted, except per share data):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Income (loss) before income taxes:     
Income before income taxes:     
Homebuilding$157,991
 $(275,830) $(1,240,155)$757,317
 $635,177
 $479,113
Financial Services25,563
 (34,470) 5,609
58,706
 54,581
 48,709
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes183,554
 (310,300) (1,234,546)
Income before income taxes816,023
 689,758
 527,822
Income tax expense (benefit)(22,591) (99,912) (137,817)321,933
 215,420
 (2,092,294)
Net income (loss)$206,145
 $(210,388) $(1,096,729)
Net income$494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
Per share data - assuming dilution:          
Net income (loss)$0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90)
Net income$1.36
 $1.26
 $6.72

The Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes included charges relatedimproved each year from 2013 to 2015, primarily as the result of higher gross margins and revenues. Homebuilding income before income taxes also reflected the following significant expense (income) items ($000's omitted):
 2012 2011 2010
Land-related charges (see Note 5)
$17,195
 $35,786
 $216,352
Loss on debt retirements (see Note 7)
32,071
 5,638
 38,920
Restructuring costs (see Note 3)
11,787
 19,696
 50,718
Goodwill impairments (see Note 2)

 240,541
 656,298
Insurance-related adjustments (see Note 13)

 
 280,390
 $61,053
 $301,661
 $1,242,678
 2015 2014 2013
Corporate office relocation (see Note 2)
$4,369
 $16,344
 $15,376
Land-related charges (see Note 3)
11,467
 11,168
 9,672
Loss on debt retirements (see Note 6)

 8,584
 26,930
Applecross matter (see Note 12)
20,000
 
 
Settlement of contractual dispute at a closed-out community (see Note 12)

 
 41,170
Insurance reserve adjustments (see Note 12)
(62,183) 69,267
 
 $(26,347) $105,363
 $93,148

For additional information on each of the above, see the applicable Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our Homebuilding operatingThe acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014 (see Note 1) was not material to our results improved significantly from the losses experienced in 2011 and 2010 as the result of the lower charges listed in the above table, as well as higher revenues, increased gross margins, and improved overhead leverage.operations or financial condition.

The increase in Financial Services income in 2012 compared to the loss in 2011 was due to higher origination volumes, improved loan pricing, and lower loss reserves related to loans originated in previous years. Such loss reserves totaled $49.0 million in 2012,2015 compared with $59.3 million in 2011 (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Financial Services loss in 2011 compared to the income in 20102014 and 2013 was primarily due to increasedan increase in mortgage originations. Additionally, we reduced loan loss reserves by $11.4 million in 2011 as such2015 versus a reduction of $18.6 million in 2014. In 2013, loss reserves totaledremained unchanged. See $16.9 million in 2010Note 12.

The income tax benefits
Our effective tax rate was 39.5%, 31.2% and (396.4)% for 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Income tax expense (benefit) reflects provisions and (reversals) of deferred tax asset valuation allowances totaling $3.1 million, $(45.6) million, and $(2.1) billion in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. See Note 9.2012, 2011, and 2010 were attributable primarily to the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters.

2221




Homebuilding Operations

The following is a summary of income (loss) before income taxes for our Homebuilding operations ($000’s omitted):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 2011 FY 2011 vs. FY 2010 20102015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014 FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 2013
Home sale revenues$4,552,412
 15 % $3,950,743
 (11)% $4,419,812
$5,792,675
 2 % $5,662,171
 4 % $5,424,309
Land sale revenues106,698
 29 % 82,853
 198 % 27,815
48,536
 40 % 34,554
 (70)% 114,335
Total Homebuilding revenues4,659,110
 16 % 4,033,596
 (9)% 4,447,627
5,841,211
 3 % 5,696,725
 3 % 5,538,644
Home sale cost of revenues (a)
3,833,451
 11 % 3,444,398
 (14)% 4,006,385
4,440,893
 2 % 4,343,249
 1 % 4,310,528
Land sale cost of revenues (b)
94,880
 60 % 59,279
 11 % 53,555
35,858
 51 % 23,748
 (77)% 104,426
Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") (c)
514,457
 (1)% 519,583
 (42)% 895,102
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities (d)
(3,873) 21 % (3,194) 12 % (2,843)
Other expense (income), net (e)
66,298
 (77)% 293,102
 (61)% 742,385
Interest income, net(4,094) 9 % (3,742) (45)% (6,802)
Income (loss) before income taxes$157,991
 157 % $(275,830) 78 % $(1,240,155)
Selling, general, and administrative expenses ("SG&A") (b)
589,780
 (12)% 667,815
 17 % 568,500
Other expense, net (c)
17,363
 (35)% 26,736
 (65)% 76,077
Income before income taxes$757,317
 19 % $635,177
 33 % $479,113
Supplemental data:             

   

Gross margin from home sales15.8% 300 bps
 12.8% 340 bps
 9.4%23.3% 0 bps
 23.3% 280 bps
 20.5%
SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues11.3% (190) bps
 13.2% (710) bps
 20.3%10.2% 160 bps
 11.8% 130 bps
 10.5%
Closings (units)16,505
 8 % 15,275
 (11)% 17,095
17,127
  % 17,196
 (3)% 17,766
Average selling price$276
 7 % $259
 0 % $259
$338
 3 % $329
 8 % $305
Net new orders:
                  
Units19,039
 25 % 15,215
 0 % 15,148
18,008
 8 % 16,652
 (3)% 17,080
Dollars (f)
$5,424,300
 37 % $3,953,829
 1 % $3,898,950
Dollars (d)
$6,305,380
 13 % $5,558,937
 3 % $5,394,566
Cancellation rate15%   19%   19%14%   15%   15%
Active communities at December 31670
 (4)% 700
 (11)% 786
620
 4 % 598
 4 % 577
Backlog at December 31:                  
Units6,458
 65 % 3,924
 (2)% 3,984
6,731
 15 % 5,850
 1 % 5,772
Dollars$1,931,538
 82 % $1,059,649
 0 % $1,056,563
$2,456,565
 26 % $1,943,861
 2 % $1,901,796

(a)
Includes the amortization of capitalized interest. Home sale cost of revenues also includes land and community valuation adjustments of $13.4 million, $15.9 million, and $169.7 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
(b)
Includes net realizable value adjustments for land held for saleSG&A includes costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters totaling $2.0 million, $7.6 million, and $15.0 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively (see Note 2$1.5 million, $9.8 million), and $39.1adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to a reversal of $62.2 million for 2012, 2011, in 2015 and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 122010, respectively.).
(c)
SG&A for 2010Includes losses related to the redemption of debt totaling $8.6 million and $26.9 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. Also includes lease exit charges of $2.3 million and $8.7 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively, resulting from the adverse impactrelocation of insurance reserve adjustmentsour corporate headquarters (see Note 2), a charge of $20.0 million in 2015 resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12), and charges totaling $41.2 million in 2013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community (see Note 12$280.4 million).
(d)
Includes impairments of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, which totaled $1.9 million in 2010.
(e)
Includes goodwill impairment charges of $240.5 million and $656.3 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Also includes the write-off of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for land option contracts we elected not to pursue of $2.3 million, $10.0 million, and $5.6 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and net losses related to the redemption of debt totaling $32.1 million, $5.6 million, and $38.9 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
(f)Net new order dollars represent a composite of new order dollars combined with other movements of the dollars in backlog related to cancellations and change orders.


2322



Home sale revenues

Home sale revenues for 20122015 were higher than 20112014 by $601.7$130.5 million,, or 15%2%. The increase was attributable to a 7%3% increase in the average selling price combined with an 8% increase in closings.while closings remained relatively flat. The increase in average selling price reflects an ongoing shift in our revenue mix toward move-up buyersbuyers. Closing volume was flat as higher net new orders were offset by production delays in certain communities caused by a number of factors, including tight labor resources and improved marketadverse weather conditions. The increase in closings was realized from 4% fewer active communities and was concentrated primarily in our North and Southwest segments.

Home sale revenues for 20112014 were lowerhigher than 20102013 by $469.1$237.9 million,, or 11%4%. The decreaseincrease was attributable to an 11%8% increase in the average selling price offset by a 3% decrease in closings. The increase in average selling price occurred in substantially all of our local markets and reflected a shift in our revenue mix toward move-up and active adult buyers along with improved market conditions that allowed for increased sale prices, including higher levels of house options and lot premiums. The decrease in closings as average selling prices remained stableresulted from 2010 to 2011. The declinethe lower net new order volume in closings for 20112014 combined with the lower beginning of the year backlog in 2014 compared with 2010 occurred in each of our Homebuilding segments, except for Florida, and resulted primarily from lower industry volumes, in part due to the expirationbeginning of the federal homebuyer tax credit that existed during 2010. This tax credit favorably impacted new orders and closings during the first half of 2010, in part we believe by pulling forward customer demand. The 11% decrease in our active communities also contributed to the lower closings.year 2013.

Home sale gross margins

Home sale gross margins were 15.8%23.3% in 2012,2015, compared with 12.8%23.3% in 20112014 and 9.4%20.5% in 2010.2013. Gross margins during 2012remain strong relative to historical levels and2011 benefited from lower land and community valuation adjustments of $13.4 million and $15.9 million, respectively, compared to $169.7 million in 2010. The increase in gross margins was despite increased capitalized interest amortization, which reduced gross margins by 10 basis points and 70 basis points in 2012 and 2011, respectively, as compared with the comparable prior year periods. The higher capitalized interest amortization was attributable primarily to debt assumed with our 2009 merger with Centex.

Excluding the impact of land and community valuation adjustments and capitalized interest amortization, adjusted home sale gross margins improved to 20.9% in 2012 from 17.9% in 2011 and 16.7% in 2010 (see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section for a reconciliation of adjusted home sale gross margins). These improved gross margins reflect a combination of factors, including shifts in community mix, relatively stable pricing conditions in 2015 following improved pricing conditions in 2014, and lower amortized interest costs (2.4%, 3.4%, and 4.7% of home sale revenues in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively), offset by higher house construction and land costs. The lower amortized interest costs resulted from the product mixreduction in our outstanding debt in recent years. Gross margins during 2015 and 2014 were also affected by higher land impairments of homes closed toward move-up buyers, better alignment of our product offering$7.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively, compared with current market conditions, contributions from our strategic pricing and house cost reduction objectives, and,$2.9 million in 2012, an improved demand and pricing environment.2013.

Land sales

We periodically elect to sell parcels of land to third parties in the event such assets no longer fit into our strategic operating plans or are zoned for commercial or other development. Land sale revenues and their related gains or losses vary between periods, depending on the timing of land sales and our strategic operating decisions. Land sales had margin contributions of $11.8$12.7 million,, $23.6 $10.8 million,, and $(25.7)$9.9 million in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively. These margin contributions included net realizable value adjustments related to land held for sale totaling $1.5 million, $9.8 million, and $39.1 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

SG&A

In order to reduce overhead costs, we have reconfigured our organization in recent years to better align our overhead structure with expected volumes. These actions have included consolidating many local divisions along with reducing corporate and support staffing across a number of functions. As a result, SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues dropped from 13.2% in 2011 to 11.3% in 2012. The gross dollar amount of our SG&A decreased $5.1 million, or 1%, in 2012 compared to 2011 due to this improved overhead leverage, partially offset primarily by higher incentive compensation resulting from our improved operating results.

The gross dollar amount of our SG&A decreased $375.5 million, or 42%, in 2011 compared to 2010 while SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues dropped to 13.2% in 2011 from 20.3% in 2010. SG&A in 2010 included $280.4 million in insurance reserve adjustments, substantially all of which related to general liability construction defect claims (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of insurance reserve adjustments). Excluding these insurance reserve adjustments, SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues was 13.2%10.2%, 11.8%, and 13.9%10.5% in 20112015, 2014, and 20102013, respectively. The gross dollar amount of our SG&A decreased $78.0 million, or 12%, respectively. (Seein 2015 compared with 2014. SG&A included adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to a reversal of $62.2 million in 2015 and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 12). Additionally, we incurred $2.0 million and $7.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively, of employee severance, retention, relocation, and related costs attributable to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section for a reconciliationrelocation of our corporate headquarters. Excluding each of these items, SG&A in both dollars and as a percentage of home sale revenue, excluding insurance reserve adjustments).revenues increased for 2015 compared with 2014. This improvedincrease in gross overhead leverage resulted from a combination of better matching our overall cost structuredollars in 2015 was primarily due to investments in increased headcount and information systems along with higher costs in conjunction with the current business environmentopening of approximately 200 new communities.

The gross dollar amount of our SG&A increased $99.3 million, or 17%, in 2014 compared with 2013. SG&A included charges totaling $69.3 million to increase general liability insurance reserves in 2014. Additionally, we incurred $7.6 million and lower$15.0 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, of employee severance, retention, relocation, and equity compensation expenserelated costs attributable to the relocation of our corporate headquarters. The remainder of the increase in 2011gross overhead dollars in 2014 compared with 2013 were primarily due to 2010.variable costs related to the higher revenue volume.



2423



Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities

Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities was $(3.9) million, $(3.2) million, and $(2.8) million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The majority of our unconsolidated entities represent land development joint ventures. As a result, the timing of income and losses varies between periods depending on the timing of transactions and circumstances specific to each entity.
Other expense, (income), net

Other expense, (income), net includes the following ($000’s omitted):
 2012 2011 2010
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 4)
$2,278
 $10,002
 $5,594
Loss on debt retirements (Note 7)
32,071
 5,638
 38,920
Lease exit and related costs (Note 3)
7,306
 9,900
 28,378
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
13,100
 13,100
 13,100
Goodwill impairments (Note 2)

 240,541
 656,298
Miscellaneous expense (income), net11,543
 13,921
 95
 $66,298
 $293,102
 $742,385
 2015 2014 2013
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 3)
$5,021
 $6,099
 $3,122
Loss on debt retirements (Note 6)

 8,584
 26,930
Lease exit and related costs2,463
 9,609
 2,778
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
12,900
 13,033
 13,100
Interest income(3,107) (4,632) (4,395)
Interest expense788
 849
 712
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities (Note 5)
(7,355) (8,226) (993)
Miscellaneous expense, net6,653
 1,420
 34,823
 $17,363
 $26,736
 $76,077

For additional information on each of the above, see the applicable Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Miscellaneous expense, (income), net includes a charge of $20.0 million resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12$5.1 million) in 20122015 and $17.1charges of $41.2 million in 20112013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to the write-down of notes receivable.a previously completed luxury community.

Interest income, net

The increase in interest income, net for 2012 compared with 2011 resulted primarily from higher invested cash balances. The decrease in interest income, net in 2011 compared with 2010 resulted from lower invested cash balances.

Net new orders

Net new orders increased 25%8% in 20122015 compared with 2011 while2014. The increase resulted from improved sales per community combined with selling from 4% fewera larger number of active communities, in 2012 (670which increased 4% to 620 at December 31, 2012). The increase in net new orders was broad-based as each of our reportable segments experienced increases during 2012, with the largest increases occurring in our North and Southwest segments.2015. The cancellation rate (canceled orders for the period divided by gross new orders for the period) was 15%decreased slightly in 2012 compared to 19% in 2011.2015 from 2014 at 14% and 15%, respectively. Ending backlog units, which represent orders for homes that have not yet closed, increased 65%15% at December 31, 20122015 compared with December 31, 20112014 as measured in units and increased by 26% over the prior year period as measured in dollars. The higher backlog resulted from the higher net new order volume, especially in the fourth quarter, combined with production delays in certain communities in 2015 caused by a number of factors, including tight labor resources and adverse weather conditions. The higher average sales price also contributed to the higher backlog dollars.

Net new orders decreased 3% in 2014 compared with 2013, primarily as the result of fewer active communities throughout the majority of 2014. The number of active communities increased slightly in 2014 compared with 2013 (up 4% to 598 active communities at December 31, 2014), though this was primarily due to our acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014 (see Note 1,). Excluding such assets, our active community count actually declined in 2014 as our pace of new community openings lagged the number of community close-outs. The cancellation rate was unchanged from 2013 to 2014 at 15%. Ending backlog units increased 1% at December 31, 2014 compared with December 31, 2013 and increased 2% as measured in dollars due to the increase in net new orders.our average selling price.

Net new order levels were essentially flat for 2011 compared with 2010. Net new orders reflected the impact of the federal homebuyer tax credit that expired during 2010, which favorably impacted new orders during the first half of 2010, and the reduced number of active communities in 2011. At December 31, 2011, we had 700 active communities, a decrease of 11% from December 31, 2010. The cancellation rate for 2011 was unchanged from 2010 at 19%. Ending backlog was essentially flat at December 31, 2011 compared with December 31, 2010, consistent with the overall new order levels.


25



Homes in production

The following is a summary of our homes in production at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014:
 2012 2011 2015 2014
Sold 4,162
 2,640
 4,573
 3,761
Unsold        
Under construction 753
 1,381
 1,450
 815
Completed 503
 1,481
 471
 483
 1,256
 2,862
 1,921
 1,298
Models 1,119
 1,278
 1,024
 981
Total 6,537
 6,780
 7,518
 6,040

The slight decrease innumber of homes in production at December 31, 20122015 was 24% higher compared to December 31, 2011 is the result of a significant reduction2014. The increase in homes under production was due to a combination of factors, including a 4% increase in active communities, a 15% increase in ending backlog units, and a conscious decision to moderately increase the number of unsold to customershomes under construction ("spec homes"), largely offset by a large at the end of the year. The increase in the number of sold homes in production. Reducing our reliance on sales of spec homes isreflects our intentions to achieve a componentmore even

24



flow production cycle over the course of 2016 compared with 2015. As part of our strategic pricing and inventory turns objectives, somanagement strategy, we focusedwill continue to maintain reasonable inventory levels relative to demand in 2012each of our markets. We continue to focus on lowering the overallmaintaining a low level of spec home inventory, especially completed specs ("final specs"). The increase in sold homes in production resulted from, though inventory levels tend to fluctuate throughout the significant increase in net new orders and backlog.year.

Controlled lots

The following is a summary of our lots under control at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014:
 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
 Owned Optioned Controlled Owned Optioned Controlled Owned Optioned Controlled Owned Optioned Controlled
Northeast 9,211
 2,655
 11,866
 10,540
 2,121
 12,661
 6,361
 4,114
 10,475
 6,389
 4,185
 10,574
Southeast 13,372
 2,756
 16,128
 15,016
 3,215
 18,231
 11,161
 7,933
 19,094
 11,195
 4,785
 15,980
Florida 23,906
 3,689
 27,595
 26,444
 2,136
 28,580
 21,230
 9,636
 30,866
 20,511
 7,119
 27,630
Midwest 13,093
 6,985
 20,078
 14,571
 5,714
 20,285
Texas 12,218
 3,685
 15,903
 14,759
 4,231
 18,990
 13,308
 7,052
 20,360
 11,847
 7,435
 19,282
North 12,946
 2,603
 15,549
 15,084
 1,676
 16,760
Southwest 31,407
 1,427
 32,834
 35,090
 698
 35,788
West 30,766
 6,440
 37,206
 31,707
 5,335
 37,042
Total 103,060
 16,815
 119,875
 116,933
 14,077
 131,010
 95,919
 42,160
 138,079
 96,220
 34,573
 130,793
                        
Developed (%) 27% 34% 28% 28% 38% 29% 28% 12% 23% 25% 23% 25%

Of our controlled lots, 103,06095,919 and 116,93396,220 were owned and 9,63442,160 and 10,06034,573 were under land option agreements approved for purchase at December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. In addition, there were 7,181 and 4,017 lots under option agreements pending approval at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. While competition for well-positioned land is robust, we continue to purchasepursue strategic land positions where it makes strategic and economic sense to do so, the reduction in lots resulting from closings, land disposition activity, and withdrawals from land option contracts exceeded the number of lots added by new transactions during the year ended December 31, 2012. This trend is consistent with our focusthat drive appropriate returns on improving our inventory turns.

invested capital. The remaining purchase price under our land option agreements totaled $923.4 million$2.0 billion at December 31, 2012.2015. These land option agreements, which generally may be canceled at our discretion and in certain cases extend over several years, are secured by deposits and pre-acquisition costs totaling $70.1$162.1 million,, of which only $2.9$10.5 million is refundable.


26



Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This report contains information about our home sale gross margins and selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) reflecting certain adjustments. These measures are considered non-GAAP financial measures under the SEC's rules and should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, the comparable GAAP financial measures as measures of our operating performance. Management and our local divisions use these measures in evaluating the operating performance of each community and in making strategic decisions regarding sales pricing, construction and development pace, product mix, and other daily operating decisions. We believe they are relevant and useful measures to investors for evaluating our performance through (1) gross profit generated on homes delivered during a given period and (2) the efficiency of our overhead cost structure and for comparing our operating performance to other companies in the homebuilding industry. Although other companies in the homebuilding industry report similar information, the methods used may differ. We urge investors to understand the methods used by other companies in the homebuilding industry to calculate gross margins and SG&A and any adjustments thereto before comparing our measures to that of such other companies.

The following tables set forth reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the GAAP financial measures that management believes to be most directly comparable ($000's omitted):
Home sale gross margin     
 Years Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Home sale revenues$4,552,412
 $3,950,743
 $4,419,812
Home sale cost of revenues3,833,451
 3,444,398
 4,006,385
Home sale gross margin718,961
 506,345
 413,427
Add:     
Land and community valuation adjustments (a)
$6,969
 $10,498
 $141,592
Capitalized interest amortization (a)
224,291
 189,382
 180,918
Adjusted home sale gross margin$950,221
 $706,225
 $735,937
      
Home sale gross margin as a percentage of home sale revenues15.8% 12.8% 9.4%
Adjusted home sale gross margin as a percentage of home sale revenues20.9% 17.9% 16.7%

(a)Write-offs of capitalized interest related to land and community valuation adjustments are reflected in capitalized interest amortization.

SG&A     
 Years Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Home sale revenues$4,552,412
 $3,950,743
 $4,419,812
      
SG&A$514,457
 $519,583
 $895,102
Less: Insurance reserve adjustments (a)

 
 280,390
SG&A excluding insurance reserve adjustments$514,457
 $519,583
 $614,712
      
SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues11.3% 13.2% 20.3%
SG&A excluding insurance reserve adjustments as a percentage of home
   sale revenues
11.3% 13.2% 13.9%

(a)Adjustments to recorded insurance reserves, primarily related to general liability exposures.


27



Homebuilding Segment Operations

Our homebuilding operations represent our core business. Homebuilding offers a broad product line to meet the needs of homebuyers in our targeted markets. As of December 31, 20122015, we conducted our operations in 5850 markets located throughout 2826 states. For reporting purposes, our Homebuilding operations are aggregated into six reportable segments:segments. For 2015, we realigned our organizational structure and reportable segment presentation. Accordingly, the segment information provided in this note has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation for all periods presented.
 
Northeast:  Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Virginia
Southeast:  Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Florida: Florida
Midwest:Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio
Texas: Texas
North:Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Northern California, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
Southwest:West:  Arizona, Colorado,California, Nevada, New Mexico, Southern California
Washington

We also have a reportable segment for our financial services operations, which consist principally of mortgage banking and title operations. The Financial Services segment operates generally in the same markets as the Homebuilding segments.


2825



The following table presents selected financial information for our reportable Homebuilding segments:
 
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 2011 FY 2011 vs. FY 2010 20102015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014 FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 2013
Home sale revenues:                  
Northeast$722,691
 1 % $714,609
 (5)% $754,280
$679,082
 (4)% $708,465
 (10)% $784,087
Southeast689,163
 2 % 675,124
 (10)% 752,509
1,058,055
 11 % 949,134
 13 % 842,856
Florida620,156
 11 % 557,865
 3 % 539,996
1,012,391
 11 % 913,758
 14 % 800,331
Midwest1,012,460
 16 % 869,271
 10 % 786,930
Texas666,759
 8 % 615,319
 (4)% 638,424
840,766
 (2)% 856,613
 6 % 804,806
North989,510
 36 % 727,085
 (16)% 861,559
Southwest864,133
 31 % 660,741
 (24)% 873,044
West1,189,921
 (13)% 1,364,930
 (3)% 1,405,299
$4,552,412
 15 % $3,950,743
 (11)% $4,419,812
$5,792,675
 2 % $5,662,171
 4 % $5,424,309
Income (loss) before income taxes:         
Income before income taxes:         
Northeast$73,345
 150 % $29,320
 (15)% $34,619
$82,616
 (20)% $103,865
 (6)% $110,246
Southeast64,678
 44 % 45,060
 92 % 23,454
172,330
 10 % 156,513
 29 % 121,055
Florida73,472
 63 % 44,946
 186 % (51,995)196,525
 3 % 190,441
 36 % 139,673
Midwest91,745
 16 % 78,863
 (7)% 84,551
Texas60,979
 83 % 33,329
 108 % 16,026
121,329
 (9)% 133,005
 19 % 111,431
North84,597
 (b)
 (12,376) (b)
 571
Southwest79,887
 118 % 36,647
 157 % (64,140)
West169,394
 (33)% 254,724
 (2)% 258,960
Other homebuilding (a)
(278,967) 38 % (452,756) 62 % (1,198,690)(76,622) 73 % (282,234) 19 % (346,803)
$157,991
 157 % $(275,830) 78 % $(1,240,155)$757,317
 19 % $635,177
 33 % $479,113
Closings (units):                  
Northeast1,800
 (4)% 1,880
 (10)% 2,083
1,496
 (5)% 1,568
 (15)% 1,835
Southeast2,757
 (1)% 2,771
 (10)% 3,095
3,276
 4 % 3,160
 5 % 3,022
Florida2,340
 4 % 2,251
 1 % 2,224
2,896
 5 % 2,752
  % 2,747
Midwest2,961
 15 % 2,581
 10 % 2,352
Texas3,487
 5 % 3,327
 (7)% 3,563
3,357
 (10)% 3,750
  % 3,768
North3,103
 20 % 2,579
 (16)% 3,055
Southwest3,018
 22 % 2,467
 (20)% 3,075
West3,141
 (7)% 3,385
 (16)% 4,042
16,505
 8 % $15,275
 (11)% 17,095
17,127
  % $17,196
 (3)% 17,766
Average selling price:                  
Northeast$401
 6 % $380
 5 % $362
$454
  % $452
 6 % $427
Southeast250
 2 % 244
 0 % 243
323
 8 % 300
 8 % 279
Florida265
 7 % 248
 2 % 243
350
 5 % 332
 14 % 291
Midwest342
 2 % 337
 1 % 335
Texas191
 3 % 185
 3 % 179
250
 10 % 228
 7 % 214
North319
 13 % 282
 0 % 282
Southwest286
 7 % 268
 (6)% 284
West379
 (6)% 403
 16 % 348
$276
 7 % $259
 0 % $259
$338
 3 % $329
 8 % $305

(a)
Other homebuilding includes the amortization of intangible assets, goodwill impairment, amortization of capitalized interest, net losses related to the redemption of debt, and other costsitems not allocated to the operating segments.
(b)Percentage not meaningfulsegments, in addition to: losses on debt retirements of $8.6 million and $26.9 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively (see Note 6); adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to a reversal of $62.2 million in 2015 and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 12); costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters totaling $4.4 million, $16.3 million, and $15.4 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively (see Note 2); and charges of $41.2 million in 2013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community (see Note 12).



2926



The following tables present additional selected financial information for our reportable Homebuilding segments:
 
 Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted) Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 2011 FY 2011 vs. FY 2010 2010 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014 FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 2013
Net new orders - units:                    
Northeast 1,997
 14% 1,749
 6 % 1,650
 1,479
 5 % 1,408
 (23)% 1,834
Southeast 3,066
 16% 2,642
 (4)% 2,747
 3,454
 12 % 3,075
 (3)% 3,164
Florida 2,747
 19% 2,314
 13 % 2,046
 3,168
 12 % 2,841
 9 % 2,595
Midwest 2,862
 23 % 2,329
 (1)% 2,361
Texas 4,117
 26% 3,278
 5 % 3,129
 3,429
 (9)% 3,773
 6 % 3,563
North 3,661
 39% 2,635
 (3)% 2,716
Southwest 3,451
 33% 2,597
 (9)% 2,860
West 3,616
 12 % 3,226
 (9)% 3,563
 19,039
 25% 15,215
 0 % 15,148
 18,008
 8 % 16,652
 (3)% 17,080
Net new orders - dollars:                    
Northeast $820,609
 22% $674,134
 9 % $617,899
 $674,637
 4 % $649,202
 (17)% $782,474
Southeast 787,286
 22% 645,993
 (3)% 662,650
 1,160,590
 23 % 944,567
 5 % 895,800
Florida 735,250
 26% 581,778
 18 % 494,587
 1,152,705
 21 % 954,892
 16 % 820,032
Midwest 1,024,784
 26 % 815,968
 5 % 778,485
Texas 807,455
 33% 606,239
 6 % 570,860
 905,003
 3 % 881,843
 11 % 796,377
North 1,228,743
 64% 748,089
 (1)% 757,639
Southwest 1,044,957
 50% 697,596
 (12)% 795,315
West 1,387,661
 6 % 1,312,465
 (1)% 1,321,398
 $5,424,300
 37% $3,953,829
 1 % $3,898,950
 $6,305,380
 13 % $5,558,937
 3 % $5,394,566
Cancellation rates:                    
Northeast 12%   14%   16% 12%   12%   13%
Southeast 13%   16%   16% 10%   12%   12%
Florida 12%   13%   11% 11%   10%   13%
Midwest 13%   13%   10%
Texas 22%   28%   29% 19%   19%   22%
North 13%   17%   17%
Southwest 15%   19%   18%
West 18%   18%   17%
 15%   19%   19% 14%   15%   15%
Unit backlog:                    
Northeast 622
 46% 425
 (24)% 556
 444
 (4)% 461
 (26)% 621
Southeast 911
 51% 602
 (18)% 731
 1,146
 18 % 968
 (8)% 1,053
Florida 1,065
 62% 658
 11 % 595
 1,274
 27 % 1,002
 10 % 913
Midwest 1,089
 (8)% 1,188
 45 % 818
Texas 1,455
 76% 825
 (6)% 874
 1,345
 6 % 1,273
 2 % 1,250
North 1,267
 79% 709
 9 % 653
Southwest 1,138
 61% 705
 23 % 575
West 1,433
 50 % 958
 (14)% 1,117
 6,458
 65% 3,924
 (2)% 3,984
 6,731
 15 % 5,850
 1 % 5,772
Backlog dollars:                    
Northeast $276,851
 55% $178,934
 (18)% $219,409
 $211,532
 (2)% $215,977
 (22)% $275,239
Southeast 252,656
 63% 154,533
 (16)% 183,664
 403,568
 34 % 301,033
 (1)% 305,600
Florida 289,133
 66% 174,039
 16 % 150,126
 490,282
 40 % 349,968
 13 % 308,834
Midwest 382,360
 3 % 370,036
 33 % 278,040
Texas 294,623
 91% 153,927
 (6)% 163,007
 375,660
 21 % 311,424
 9 % 286,195
North 446,741
 115% 207,507
 11 % 186,503
Southwest 371,534
 95% 190,709
 24 % 153,854
West 593,163
 50 % 395,423
 (12)% 447,888
 $1,931,538
 82% $1,059,649
 0 % $1,056,563
 $2,456,565
 26 % $1,943,861
 2 % $1,901,796

3027



The following table presents additional selected financial information for our reportable Homebuilding segments:
 Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted) Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 2011 FY 2011 vs. FY 2010 2010 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014 FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 2013
Land-related charges*:                    
Northeast $1,794
 (64)% $4,958
 17 % $4,235
 $3,301
 17 % $2,824
 407 % $557
Southeast 1,363
 (44)% 2,429
 (83)% 14,141
 3,022
 65 % 1,826
 83 % 998
Florida 214
 (95)% 3,999
 (93)% 56,833
 4,555
 835 % 487
 (55)% 1,076
Midwest 2,319
 (1)% 2,347
 25 % 1,883
Texas 556
 (33)% 828
 (88)% 6,814
 295
 (8)% 321
 68 % 191
North 4,546
 (69)% 14,867
 (47)% 28,076
Southwest 2,254
 (31)% 3,263
 (96)% 78,123
West (2,615) (254)% 1,696
 (16)% 2,023
Other homebuilding 6,468
 19 % 5,442
 (81)% 28,130
 590
 (65)% 1,667
 (43)% 2,944
 $17,195
 (52)% $35,786
 (83)% $216,352
 $11,467
 3 % $11,168
 15 % $9,672

*
Land-related charges include land and community valuation adjustments,impairments, net realizable value adjustments for land held for sale, and write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for land option contracts we elected not to pursue, and impairments of our investments in unconsolidated entities.costs. Other homebuilding consists primarily of write-offs of capitalized interest.interest resulting from land-related charges. See Notes 3and4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of these charges.

Northeast:

For 2012,2015, Northeast home sale revenues increased 1%decreased 4% compared with 20112014 due to a 5% decrease in closings. Average selling price remained flat over 2014. The decrease in closings occurred in Mid-Atlantic and New England and contributed
to the lower income before income taxes. However, the decreased income before income taxes resulted primarily from a charge of $20.0 million resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12). Net new orders increased 5%, primarily due to increased order levels in the Northeast Corridor.

For 2014, Northeast home sale revenues decreased 10% compared with 2013 due to a 15% decrease in closings offset by a 6% increase in the average selling price. The decrease in closings occurred across all divisions. The increase in the average selling price offsetoccurred primarily in New England and the Mid-Atlantic. The decreased income before income taxes resulted from lower revenue and gross margins combined and increased overhead. Net new orders decreased 23%, reflecting lower order levels across all divisions due in part to a lower active community count.

Southeast:

For 2015, Southeast home sale revenues increased 11% compared with 2014 due to an 8% increase in the average selling price combined with a 4% increase in closings. The increase in the average selling price and closings were broad-based, though Tennessee experienced declines. The increased income before income taxes resulted primarily from higher revenues. Net new orders increased 12% in 2015 mainly due to increased order levels in Raleigh and Georgia, partially offset by a 4% decreasedecline in Tennessee.

For 2014, Southeast home sale revenues increased 13% compared with 2013 due to an 8% increase in the average selling price combined with a 5% increase in closings. The increase in the average selling price was due to increases across all divisions. The increase in closing volumes was primarily due to increases in Georgia and the Coastal Carolinas. The increased income before income taxes resulted from higher revenues combined with improved gross margins. Net new orders decreased 3% in 2014 mainly due to lower order levels in Tennessee, Charlotte, and the Coastal Carolinas.

Florida:

For 2015, Florida home sale revenues increased 11% compared with 2014 due to a 5% increase in the average selling price combined with a 5% increase in closings. The increase in average selling price occurred primarily in the Northeast Corridorboth North and Mid-Atlantic, while the decrease in closings was concentrated in the Northeast Corridor and was due to a significant decrease in active communities.South Florida. The significant increase inincreased income before income taxes was due to moderately improved gross margins and $21.9 million of expense in 2011 related to the write-down of a note receivable and unfavorable resolution of certain contingencies.for 2015 resulted primarily from higher revenues. Net new orders increased 14%, led by our operations12% in New England.2015 due primarily to an increase in active communities in North and West Florida.


28



For 2011, Northeast2014, Florida home sale revenues decreased 5%increased 14% compared with 20102013 due to a 10% decrease in closings offset in part by a 5%14% increase in the average selling price. The reduction in closing volumes was primarily due to fewer closings in our Mid-Atlantic division, in part due to a lower active community count. The decreased income before income taxes was primarily due to expense of $21.9 million in 2011 related to the write-down of a note receivable and unfavorable resolution of certain contingencies. Such expense was partially offset by improved gross margin compared to the prior year. Net new orders increased 6% in 2011, led by our operations in the Northeast Corridor and Mid-Atlantic.

Southeast:

For 2012, Southeast home sale revenues increased 2% compared with 2011 due to a 2%increase in the average selling price partiallyoccurred in both North and South Florida. Closings remained flat compared with the prior year as an increase in closings in South Florida was offset by a 1%decrease in closings. The increaseclosings in average selling price was concentrated in Georgia and Tennessee. The decrease in closing volumes was primarily due to a moderate decrease in Raleigh. North Florida. The increased income before income taxes was due to moderatelyfor 2014 resulted from higher revenues combined with improved gross margins. Net new orders increased 16%by 9% in 2012 and reflected increases across all divisions.2014 due to an increase in active communities in South Florida

For 2011, Southeast home sale revenues decreased 10% compared with 2010 due to a 10% decrease in closings as there was no change in the average selling price. The reduction in closing volumes was primarily due to fewer closings in our Georgia division as well as a lower active community count across all divisions. Gross margin improved compared with the prior year period. The increased income before income taxes was also due to lower land-related charges. Net new orders decreased 4% compared with 2010, due in part to decreased activity in our Tennessee division.

31



Florida:Midwest:

For 2012, Florida2015, Midwest home sale revenues increased 11% compared with 2011 due to a 7% increase in the average selling price and a 4% increase in closings. The increase in income before income taxes for 2012 was attributable to significantly improved gross margins and overhead leverage, as well as lower land-related charges. Net new orders increased by 19% in 2012 evenly across North and South Florida.

For 2011, Florida home sale revenues increased 3% compared with 2010 due to a 1% increase in closings combined with a 2% increase in the average selling price. The majority of this improvement was due to increased closing volumes in North Florida. The income before income taxes in 2011 was attributable to improved gross margins and significantly lower land-related charges than in 2010. Net new order units increased by 13% in 2011, in part due to grand openings or grand re-openings at several large communities.

Texas:

For 2012, Texas home sale revenues increased 8%16% compared with the prior year period due to a 5%15% increase in closings combined with a 3% increase in average selling price. The increase in closings was experienced across all markets, but was concentrated in Houston and San Antonio. The increase in average selling price was concentrated in Central Texas and Dallas. The significant increase in income before income taxes for 2012 was attributable to moderately improved gross margins and overhead leverage. Net new orders increased by 26% for 2012 and reflected increases across all divisions.

For 2011, Texas home sale revenues decreased 4% compared with 2010 due to a 7% decrease in closings partially offset by a 3%2% increase in the average selling price. The reductionincrease in closing volumes was mainly due to Central Texas and San Antonio.driven by our acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014. Partially offsetting this were lower closings in Illinois-St Louis. The increased income before income taxes in 2011was attributabledue primarily to improved gross margins and lower land-related charges than in the prior year period.higher revenues. Net new order unitsorders increased by 5% for 2011,23% in part2015 compared with 2014, mainly due to the grand openingacquisition of a large communitycertain real estate assets from Dominion Homes combined with higher orders in Houston.Indianapolis-Cleveland and Minnesota.

North:

For 2012, North2014, Midwest home sale revenues increased 36%10% compared with the prior year period due to a 20%10% increase in closings and a 13%1% increase in the average selling price. The increase in closing volumes was broad-based across all divisions,primarily due to the acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014, combined with the largest increases coming from ourin both Michigan and Indianapolis operations.Indianapolis-Cleveland. The increase in average selling price was due to increases at all divisions except Michigan, with the most significant increases in Minnesota and the Pacific Northwest. The substantial increase indecreased income before income taxes asresulted from higher overhead. Net new orders decreased by 1% in 2014 compared with 2013, mainly due to the loss experienceddecreases in 2011, wasIllinois-St. Louis and Minnesota, partially offset by an increase due to the increased revenues, significantly improved gross margins and overhead leverage, a significant reduction in land-related charges, and gains related to land sale transactions. Net new orders increased by 39% in 2012 compared with 2011, and reflected moderate to significant increases across all divisions, with the largest increases in Michigan and Northern California.acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes.

Texas:

For 2011, North2015, Texas home sale revenues decreased 16% compared with 2010 due to a 16% decrease in closings as there was no change in average selling price. The decrease in closing volumes was due to significantly fewer closings in our Minnesota, St. Louis, and Northern California divisions. Gross margin decreased slightly. The loss before income taxes was primarily due to the reduced revenues, offset in part by reduced land-related charges. Net new order units decreased by 3% in 2011 compared with 2010, primarily in our Minnesota, St. Louis, and Northern California divisions. The sales volumes for our Northern California division reflect the impact of the state homebuyer tax credit that existed in California during 2010. The expiration of this tax credit exacerbated the already challenging local market conditions. These declines were partially offset by improvements in our other North divisions.



32



Southwest:

For 2012, Southwest home sale revenues increased 31%2% compared with the prior year period due to a 22%10% decrease in closings, partially offset by a 10% increase in the average selling price. These trends were broad-based, though Houston's closings were down 16%, in part due to the impact of lower oil prices on the local economy. In other markets, the lower closings resulted primarily from tight labor resources combined with delays in opening new communities, in part due to challenging weather conditions earlier in the year. The lower revenues led to the decreased income before income taxes for 2015. Net new orders decreased by 9% for 2015 led by a 19% decline in Houston.

For 2014, Texas home sale revenues increased 6% compared with the prior year period due to a 7% increase in the average selling price. The increase in the average selling price was led by our operations in Central Texas and San Antonio. Closings were consistent with the prior year as the increases in Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio were offset by a decrease in closings in Central Texas. The increased income before income taxes for 2014 resulted from higher revenues combined with improved gross margins. Net new orders increased by 6% for 2014 while the number of active communities remained consistent with the prior year.

West:

For 2015, West home sale revenues decreased 13% compared with the prior year period due to a 7% decrease in closings combined with a 6% decrease in the average selling price. The decreased closings and decreased average selling price were driven primarily by the Pacific Northwest, Northern California, and Southern California as the result of the timing of our community openings combined with a 7%shift in the mix of closings toward lower priced communities. The decreased income before income taxes resulted from lower revenues, lower gross margins, and higher overhead as we invested in new communities. Net new orders increased by 12% in 2015 compared with 2014 due to higher order levels across all divisions except the Pacific Northwest and Southern California.

For 2014, West home sale revenues decreased 3% compared with the prior year period due to a 16% decrease in closings, offset by a 16% increase in average selling price. TheBoth the decrease in closings and the increase in the average selling price occurred across all divisions. The significant increase indecreased income before income taxes was due to the higher revenues, moderately improved gross margins, and better overhead leverage. In 2011, the Southwest also benefitedresulted from land sale gains totaling $15.5 million.lower revenues. Net new orders increaseddecreased by 33%9% in 20122014 compared with 2011 with significant increases across all divisions, except Colorado.

For 2011, Southwest home sale revenues decreased 24% compared with 2010 due to a 20% decrease in closings and a 6% decrease in average selling price. The decreases were due to weakness in each of our divisions combined with the close-out in late 2010 of our luxury condo community in Hawaii that had average selling prices in excess of $1 million. The increase in income before income taxes was2013 primarily due to improved gross margins and the significant decreasefewer active communities. Demand in land-related charges. The Southwest also benefited from land sale gains totaling $15.5 millionNorthern California in 2011. Net new order units decreased by 9%particular slowed in 20112014 compared with 2010, due to the close-out of our communitystrong demand experienced in Hawaii as well as reduced activity in our Las Vegas and Southern California markets. Sales volumes for Southern California reflect the impact of the state homebuyer tax credit that existed in California during 2010, the expiration of which exacerbated the already challenging local market conditions.2013.




29



Financial Services Operations

We conduct our Financial Services operations, which include mortgage and title operations, through Pulte Mortgage and other subsidiaries. In originating mortgage loans, we initially use our own funds, including funds available pursuant to credit agreements with either third parties or with the Company.parties. Substantially all of the loans we originate are sold in the secondary market within a short period of time after origination, generally within 30 days. We also sell the servicing rights for the loans we originate through fixed price servicing sales contracts to reduce the risks and costs inherent in servicing loans. This strategy results in owning the loans and related servicing rights for only a short period of time. Operating as a captive business model primarily targeted to supporting our Homebuilding operations, the operating resultsbusiness levels of our Financial Services operations are highly correlated to Homebuilding. Our Homebuilding customers continue to account for substantially all loan production, representing 99% of loan originations for both 2012 and 2011 and 98% for 2010.production. We believe that our capture rate, which represents loan originations from our Homebuilding operations as a percentage of total loan opportunities from our Homebuilding operations, excluding cash closings, is an important metric in evaluating the effectiveness of our captive mortgage business model.

The following table presents selected financial information for our Financial Services operations ($000’s omitted):
 
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2012 FY 2011 vs. FY 2010 2011 FY 2011 vs. FY 2010 20102015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014 FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 2013
Mortgage operations revenues$137,443
 65 % $83,260
 (12)% $94,587
$111,810
 14% $97,787
 (14)% $113,552
Title services revenues23,445
 18 % 19,834
 (27)% 27,076
28,943
 4% 27,851
 2 % 27,399
Total Financial Services revenues160,888
 56 % 103,094
 (15)% 121,663
140,753
 12% 125,638
 (11)% 140,951
Expenses(a)135,511
 (2)% 137,666
 19 % 116,122
82,047
 15% 71,057
 (23)% 92,242
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated
entities
(186) 82 % (102) 50 % (68)
Income (loss) before income taxes$25,563
 174 % $(34,470) (715)% $5,609
Income before income taxes$58,706
 8% $54,581
 12 % $48,709
Total originations:                  
Loans11,322
 19 % 9,482
 (12)% 10,770
11,435
 6% 10,805
 (9)% 11,818
Principal$2,509,928
 26 % $1,986,225
 (13)% $2,273,394
$2,929,531
 10% $2,656,683
 (4)% $2,765,509

(a) Includes loan origination reserve releases of $11.4 million and $18.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
Supplemental data:     
Capture rate82.9% 80.2% 80.2%
Average FICO score749
 749
 746
Loan application backlog$1,310,173
 $980,863
 $984,754
Funded origination breakdown:     
FHA11% 10% 16%
VA13% 12% 11%
USDA1% 2% 3%
Other agency69% 70% 67%
Total agency94% 94% 97%
Non-agency6% 6% 3%
Total funded originations100% 100% 100%

3330



 Years Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Supplemental data:     
Capture rate81.9% 78.5% 77.5%
Average FICO score743
 748
 749
Loan application backlog$1,178,321
 $583,472
 $558,821
Funded origination breakdown:     
FHA25% 30% 38%
VA12% 13% 12%
Other agency61% 56% 49%
Total agency98% 99% 99%
Non-agency2% 1% 1%
Total funded originations100% 100% 100%
Revenues

RevenuesTotal Financial Services revenues during 2015 increased 12% compared with 2014. The increase resulted from a higher capture rate and higher revenues per loan, which were attributable to a higher average loan size combined with a modest improvement in loan pricing. The improvement in loan pricing resulted primarily from a spike in mortgage industry refinancing volume in early 2015, which reduced competitive pricing pressures for new originations. Loan pricing came under more pressure in more recent months as industry refinancing volume receded. However, the overall pricing environment for new originations remains favorable.

Total Financial Services revenues during 2012 increased 56% compared to 2011 due to a 19% increase in loan origination volumes, an increase in average loan size, and improved loan pricing. The increase in loan origination volumes was due to a higher capture rate, higher Homebuilding closing volumes, and fewer cash sales. Interest income, which is included in mortgage operations revenues, was moderately higher in 2012 than in 2011 due to the increase in loan originations.

Financial Services revenues during 20112014 decreased 15%11% compared with 20102013, due in large part. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 12% decrease in loanlower origination volumes compared to 2010volume resulting from lower home closings in our Homebuilding volumes. Interest income was moderatelyoperations, combined with lower revenues per loan resulting from increased competitiveness in 2011 thanthe mortgage industry that began in 2010 due to lower interest rates on loans originated.2013.

In recent years,Since 2007, the mortgage industry has experienced a significant overall tightening of lending standards and a shift toward agency production and fixed rate loans versus adjustableproduction. Adjustable rate mortgages (“ARMs”) and unconventional loans. The substantial majorityaccounted for 6% of funded loan production during 2012, 2011,in 2015 compared with 11% and 2010 consisted of5% in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The shifts in ARM volume contributed to the higher revenue per loan in 2015 and lower revenue per loan in 2014 as ARMs generally contain lower margins. Additionally, fixed rate loans, the majority of which are prime, conforming loans. The shift toward agency fixed-rate loans has contributedmortgages tend to profitability as such loans generally result in higher profitability due tohave higher servicing values and structured guidelines that allow for expense efficiencies when processing the loan. Additionally, the historically low interest rates and difficult regulatory environment in recent periods has contributed to profitability by reducing the level of pricing competition in the market.values.

Loan origination liabilities

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties that the loans sold meetmet certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be at fault,faulty, we either repurchase the loans from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a “make-whole” payment).

In recent years,During 2015 and 2014, we experienced a significant increase in losses as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. During 2012, 2011, and 2010, we recorded additional provisions for losses as a change in estimate primarily to reflect projected claim volumes in excess of previous estimates. Losses related toreduced our loan origination liabilities totaled $49.0by $11.4 million and $18.6 million, $59.3 million,respectively, based on probable settlements of various repurchase requests and $16.9 millioncurrent conditions. Non-cash changes in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, andreserve levels are reflected in Financial Services expenses. Given the ongoing volatility in the mortgage industry, changes in values of underlying collateral over time, and the uncertaintyother uncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, it is reasonably possible that future losses may exceedactual costs could differ from our current estimates. See our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Note 1312 toin the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.


34



We entered into an agreement in conjunction with the wind down of Centex's mortgage operations, which ceased loan origination activities in December 2009, that provides a guaranty for one major investor of loans originated by Centex. This guaranty provides that we will honor the potential repurchase obligations of Centex's mortgage operations related to breaches of representations and warranties in the origination of a certain pool of loans. Other than with respect to this pool of loans, our contractual repurchase obligations are limited to our mortgage subsidiaries, which are included in non-guarantor subsidiaries (see Note 14 for a discussion of non-guarantor subsidiaries).

The mortgage subsidiary of Centex also sold loans to a bank for inclusion in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBSs”) issued by the bank. In connection with these sales, Centex's mortgage subsidiary entered into agreements pursuant to which it may be required to indemnify the bank for losses incurred by investors in the RMBSs arising out of material errors or omissions in certain information provided by the mortgage subsidiary relating to the loans and loan origination process. In 2011, the bank notified us that it has been named defendant in two lawsuits alleging various violations of federal and state securities laws asserting that untrue statements of material fact were included in the registration statements used to market the sale of two RMBS transactions which included $162 million of loans originated by Centex's mortgage subsidiary. Neither Centex's mortgage subsidiary nor the Company is named as a defendant in these actions. These actions are in their preliminary stage, and we cannot yet quantify Centex's mortgage subsidiary's potential liability as a result of these indemnification obligations. We do not believe, however, that these matters will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. We are aware of six other RMBS transactions with such indemnity provisions that include an aggregate $116 million of loans, and we are not aware of any current or threatened legal proceedings regarding those transactions.Statements.

Income before income taxes

The increased income before income taxes for 2015 as compared with 2014 is due to higher origination volume and an increase in revenue per loan. The increase in expenses over the prior period is largely a result of an increase in headcount caused by the higher origination volume, combined with the impact of changes in loan loss reserves discussed above.

The increased income before income taxes for 20122014 as compared towith 2013 resulted from the loss before income taxes in the prior year period was due to higher origination volumes, improved loan pricing, and lower loss reserves related to loans originated in previous years. Such loss reserves totaled $49.0 million in 2012, compared with $59.3 million in 2011 (see Loan origination liabilities above).

The loss before income taxes in 2011 was due to increased loss reserves related to contingent loan origination liabilities, which totaled $59.3 million in 2011, compared to $16.9 million in 2010 (see Loan origination liabilities above). Excluding these losses, our Financial Services segment experienced higher profitability during 2011 than in 2010, primarily as the result of improved2014 discussed above, partially offset by less favorable loan pricing.

31



Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is affected by a number of factors,was 39.5%, 31.2% and (396.4)% for 2015, 2014, and 2013 respectively. The 2015 effective tax rate exceeds the most significant of which are thefederal statutory rate, primarily due to state taxes including changes in valuation allowance recorded against ouron state deferred tax assets and revaluation of deferred tax assets due to state law changes in our unrecognized tax benefits. Due to the effects of these factors, ourand business operations. The 2014 effective tax rates for 2010 through 2012 are not correlatedrate is less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to the amountreversal of a portion of our income or loss before income taxes. Our effectivevaluation allowance related to certain state deferred tax rates were (12.3)%, 32.2%, and 11.2% in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The income tax benefits for 2012, 2011, and 2010 were primarily due toassets, along with the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters. The 2013 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance related to our federal and certain state deferred tax assets.

Income tax expense (benefit) reflects provisions and (reversals) related to changes to our deferred tax asset valuation allowances totaling $3.1 million, $(45.6) million, and $(2.1) billion in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The 2015 and 2014 adjustments related primarily to certain of our state deferred tax assets as the result of changes in expected future taxable income in certain jurisdictions.

In 2013, we determined that the valuation allowance against substantially all of our federal deferred tax assets and a significant portion of our state deferred tax assets was no longer required. The principal positive evidence that led to the reversal of the valuation allowance in 2013 included: (1) our emergence from a three-year cumulative loss in 2013; (2) the significant positive income we generated during 2012 and 2013, including seven consecutive quarters of pretax income as of December 31, 2013; (3) continued improvements in 2013 over recent years in other key operating metrics, including revenues, gross margin, and overhead leverage; (4) our forecasted future profitability; (5) improvement in our financial position; and (6) significant evidence that conditions in the U.S. housing industry were more favorable than in recent years and our belief that conditions would continue to be favorable in the future.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance our land acquisition, development, and construction activities and financial services operations by using internally-generated funds supplemented by credit arrangements with third parties and capital market financing. We routinely monitor current and expected operational requirements and financial market conditions to evaluate accessing other available financing sources, including revolving bank credit and securities offerings. Based on our current financial condition and credit relationships, we believe that our operations and borrowing resources are sufficient to provide for our current and foreseeable capital requirements. However, we continue to evaluate the impact of market conditions on our liquidityofferings and may determine that modifications to our financing are appropriate if market conditions deteriorate, if significant growth returns to the homebuilding industry, or if favorable capital market opportunities become available.appropriate.

At December 31, 20122015, we had unrestricted cash and equivalents of $1.4 billion754.2 million and, senior notes of $2.51.6 billion., and borrowings of $500.0 million under a term loan. We also had restricted cash balances of $72.0 million, the substantial majority of which related to cash serving as collateral under certain letter of credit facilities. Other financing sources include various letter of credit facilities and surety bond arrangements.


35



$21.3 million. We follow a diversified investment approach for our cash and equivalents by maintaining such funds with a diversifiedbroad portfolio of banks within our group of relationship banks in high quality, highly liquid, short-term investments, generally money market fundsdeposits and federal government or agency securities.investments. We monitor our investments with each bank and do not believe our cash and equivalents are exposed to any material risk of loss. However, there can be no assurances that losses of principal balance on our cash and equivalents will not occur.

Our ratio of debt to total capitalization, excluding our Financial Services debt, was 53.4%30.5% at December 31, 2012, and 32.1% net of cash and equivalents, including restricted cash. The ratio of debt to total capitalization remains above our desired target. Therefore, we are actively pursuing strategies to reduce our leverage through a combination of cash-generating activities, reducing debt, and returning to consistent profitability. In 2012 this was evidenced by the significant cash flow generated from our operations, primarily through a reduction of inventory, retiring $592.4 million of outstanding debt, and returning our operations to profitability.2015.

Credit agreementsWe retired $238.0 million, $245.7 million, and $461.4 million of senior notes during 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The 2014 and 2013 retirements occurred prior to the stated maturity dates and resulted in losses totaling $8.6 million and $26.9 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively.

We maintain separate cash-collateralized letter ofRevolving credit agreements with a number of financial institutions. Letters of credit totaling $54.5 million were outstanding under these agreements at December 31, 2012. Under these agreements, we are required to maintain deposits with these financial institutions in amounts approximating the letters of credit outstanding. Such deposits are included in restricted cash.facility

We also maintain anIn July 2014, we entered into a senior unsecured letter ofrevolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) maturing in July 2017.  The Revolving Credit Facility provides for maximum borrowings of $500.0 million and contains an uncommitted accordion feature that expires in September 2014. This facility originally permittedcould increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.0 billion, subject to certain conditions and availability of additional bank commitments.  The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for the issuance of up to $200.0 million of letters of credit for general corporate purposesthat reduce available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility and may total no more than the greater of: (i) 50% of the size of the facility or (ii) $300.0 million in support of any wholly-owned subsidiary. We voluntarily reduced the capacity of this facility to $150.0 million effective July 2, 2012.aggregate. The interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility may be based on either the London Interbank Offered Rate or Base Rate plus an applicable margin, as defined. At December 31, 2012, $124.62015, we had no borrowings outstanding and $191.3 million of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility.


32



The Revolving Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum Tangible Net Worth, a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, and a maximum Debt-to-Capitalization Ratio (as each term is defined in the Revolving Credit Facility). As of December 31, 2015, we were outstandingin compliance with all covenants. Outstanding balances under the Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Term loan

On September 30, 2015, we entered into a senior unsecured $500.0 million term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with an initial maturity date of January 3, 2017, which can be extended at our option up to 12 months. The interest rate on the Term Loan may be based on either LIBOR or a base rate plus an applicable margin, as defined. Borrowings are guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and the Term Loan contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for loans of this facility.type, including the same financial covenants as under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants.

Limited recourse notes payable

Certain of our local homebuilding operations maintain limited recourse collateralized notes payable with third parties totaling $35.3 million at December 31, 2015. These notes have maturities ranging up to six years, are collateralized by the applicable land positions to which they relate, have no recourse to any other assets, and are classified within accrued and other liabilities. The stated interest rates on these notes range up to 5.00%.

Pulte Mortgage

Pulte Mortgage provides mortgage financing for the majority of our home closings by utilizing its own funds and funds made available pursuant to credit agreements with third parties or through intercompany borrowings.parties. Pulte Mortgage uses these resources to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold to third party investors,in the secondary market, which generally occurs within 30 days. In September 2012,

Pulte Mortgage entered intomaintains a Master Repurchase Agreementmaster repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) with third party lenders. In September 2015, Pulte Mortgage entered into an amendment to the Repurchase Agreement that extended the effective date to September 2016. The Repurchase Agreement provideswas subsequently amended in December 2015 to increase the borrowing capacity to $310.0 million. The capacity decreased to $175.0 million on January 19, 2016, and increases to $200.0 million on July 29, 2016. The purpose for loan purchasesthe changes in capacity during the term of upthe agreement is to $150.0 million, subject to certain sublimits, and borrowingslower associated fees during seasonally lower volume periods of mortgage origination activity. Borrowings under the Repurchase Agreement are secured by residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. At December 31, 2012,The Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Pulte Mortgage, including quantitative thresholds related to net worth, net income, and liquidity. Pulte Mortgage had $138.8$267.9 million and $140.2 million outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement which expiresat December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively, and was in September 2013. While there can be no assurances that the Repurchase Agreement can be renewed or replaced on commercially reasonable terms uponcompliance with its expiration, we believe we have adequate liquidity to meet Pulte Mortgage's anticipated financing needs.covenants and requirements as of such dates.

Stock repurchase programs

Pursuant to $100 million stock repurchase programs authorized byIn previous years, our Board of Directors in authorized and announced a share repurchase program. In October 2002 and October 2005,2014, our Board of Directors approved an increase of $750.0 million to such authorization, and a $200further increase of $300.0 million stock repurchase authorization in February 2006 (for a total stock repurchase authorization of $400December 2015. We repurchased 21.2 million,), we have repurchased a total of 9,688,900 12.9 million, and 7.2 million shares in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, for a total of $297.7$433.7 million,. There have been no repurchases under these programs since 2006. We $245.8 million, and $118.1 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2015, we had remaining authorization to purchaserepurchase $604.8 million of common stock aggregating $102.3 million at December 31, 2012.shares.

Dividends

We did not declare areinstated our quarterly cash dividend in 2012, 2011, or 2010. FutureJuly 2013 and subsequently raised the quarterly dividend in both 2014 and 2015. Our declared quarterly cash dividends will depend upon a variety of factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors, including our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, market conditions,totaled $117.9 million, $86.4 million, and other factors.$57.5 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.


3633



Cash flows

In 2012, we generated significant positive operating cash flow through a combination of earnings and significant reductions in inventory. However, as growth conditions return to the homebuilding industry, we will need to invest significant capital into our operations to support such growth. Additionally, the supply of finished lots (fully developed land) ready for immediate home construction has declined in many of our markets. As a result, we expect that raw or partially developed land and related development costs will represent an increasing proportion of our future land investments, which may result in increased inventory levels.

Operating activities

Our net cash used in operating activities in 2015 was $348.1 million, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $309.2 million and $881.1 million in 2012 was $760.1 million, compared with $17.3 million2014 and $592.1 million in 2011 and 2010,2013, respectively. Generally, the primary drivers of our cash flow from operations are profitability and changes in inventory levels. Our negative cash flow from operations for 2015 was primarily due to an increase in inventories of $927.8 million as the result of a significant increase in land acquisition and development investment combined with a moderate increase in house inventory due to the higher order backlog and an increase in the number of spec homes consistent with our intentions to achieve a more even flow production cycle over the course of 2016 compared with 2015. The increased inventory was offset by our income before income taxes of $816.0 million. Additionally, residential mortgage loans available-for-sale increased $104.6 million as the result of an increase in home closings in the month of December compared with the prior year.

Our positive cash flow from operations for 20122014 was primarily due to our income before income taxes of $689.8 million. These cash flows were partially offset in 2014 by a net increase in inventories of $346.6 million and an increase in residential mortgage loans available-for-sale of $53.7 million.

Our positive cash flow from operations for 2013 was primarily due to our income before income taxes of $206.1$527.8 million, combined with a net decrease in inventories of $455.2$265.1 million. and a reduction of $28.4 million in residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. The inventory decrease resulted from lower reinvestment in land inventory combined with a significant reduction in spec homes in production partially offset by an increaseand lower land inventory consistent with the decline in sold homes in production.

The net losses for 2011 and 2010 were largely the resultnumber of non-cash asset impairments and insurance reserve adjustments, soactive communities, while the cash flows from operations each period primarily relate to changes in working capital. Our positive cash flow from operations in 2011 was primarily the result of a net decrease in inventories combined with income tax refunds, net of payments, of $62.2 million offset by financing Pulte Mortgage's lending operations, which reduced cash flows from operations by $52.8 million in 2011.

Our positive cash flow from operations for 2010 was primarily the result of income tax refunds, net of payments, of $941.3 million. After adjusting for these tax refunds, operating cash flow was negative for 2010. Cash flows from operations in 2010 were negatively impacted by the voluntary repurchase of certain community development district obligations for $111.2 million (see above) and using $74.5 million to finance Pulte Mortgage's lending operations. During 2010, inventory levels and residential mortgage loans available-for-sale decreased slightly.resulted from a decrease in the home closings in the month of December compared with the prior year.

Investing activities

NetInvesting activities are generally not a significant source or use of cash provided by investing activities totaled $9.7 million in 2012, compared with netfor us. Net cash used in investing activities totaled $30.9 million in 2015, compared with $67.6 million in 2014 and $46.0 million in 2013. The use of $93.6 millioncash from investing activities in 2015 was primarily due to capital expenditures as the result of new community openings.

2011 and $19.5 million in 2010. The positiveuse of cash flow from investing activities in 20122014 was primarily due to the acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes (see Note 1) and $48.8 million of capital expenditures related primarily to new community openings and the relocation of our corporate headquarters. These cash outflows were partially offset by a $55.0 million reduction in the restricted cash related to letters of credit as a result of the Revolving Credit Facility entered into in July 2014.$28.7

The use of cash from investing activities in 2013 was primarily due to $28.9 million decrease of capital expenditures, a $12.3 million increase in residential mortgage loans held for investment, and a $4.2 million increase in the restricted cash we arewere required to maintain under our letter of credit facilities, which resulted from a reduction in letters of credit outstanding, offset by capital expenditures and investments in unconsolidated entities.

The negative cash flow from investing activities for 2011 was due to $83.2 million of restricted cash we were required to maintain related to our letter of credit facilities, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment related to the consolidation of certain facilities.

The net cash used in investing activities in 2010 was primarily the result of investments in unconsolidated entities and capital expenditures, partially offset by distributions from unconsolidated entities and a reduction in residential mortgage loans held for investment.

Financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $448.2159.7 million in 20122015, compared with $324.0529.1 million and $949.7659.6 million in 20112014 and 20102013, respectively. The net cash used in financing activities for 2015 resulted primarily from the repurchase of 21.2 million common shares for $433.7 million under our repurchase authorization, payment of $239.2 million to retire senior notes at their scheduled maturity date, and payment of $116.0 million in cash dividends. These cash outflows were offset by $500.0 million of proceeds from the Term Loan executed in September 2015 and net borrowings of $127.6 million under the Repurchase Agreement to fund the increase in mortgage loans available-for-sale.

During the last three years, we significantly reduced our outstanding senior notes through a variety of transactions, including scheduled maturities, open market repurchases, early redemptions as provided within indenture agreements, and tender offers. Completion of these transactions required the use of $618.8$239.2 million,, $321.1 $250.6 million,, and $935.9$479.8 million of cash in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively. We borrowed an incremental $34.6 million under the Repurchase Agreement during 2014, and repaid $33.1 million in 2013. Cash used in financing activities in 2012for 2014 also reflects $138.8dividend payments of $75.6 million and the repurchase of borrowingscommon shares under our share repurchase authorization for $253.0 million, partially offset by funds provided by the Repurchase Agreement as well as $32.8 million from issuance of common shares in connection with employee stock option exercises. As discussed above, we used internal funds to finance Pulte Mortgage's operations during 2011 and 2010, the effects of which are reflected in cash flows from operating activities.




3734



Inflation

We, and the homebuilding industry in general, may be adversely affected during periods of high inflation because of higher land and construction costs. Inflation may also increase our financing costs. In addition, higher mortgage interest rates affect the affordability of permanent mortgage financingour products to prospective homebuyers. While we attempt to pass on to our customers increases in our costs through increased sales prices, market forces may limit our ability to do so. If we are unable to raise sales prices enough to compensate for higher costs, or if mortgage interest rates increase significantly, our revenues, gross margins, and net income wouldcould be adversely affected.

Seasonality

OurAlthough significant changes in market conditions have impacted our seasonal patterns in the past and could do so again, we historically experience variability in our quarterly results from operations due to the seasonal nature of the homebuilding operating cycle historically reflected increasedindustry. We generally experience increases in revenues profitability, and cash flow from operations during the fourth quarter based on the timing of home closings. WhileThis seasonal activity increases our working capital requirements in our third and fourth quarters to support our home production and loan origination volumes. As a result of the challenging market conditions experienced in recent years lessened the seasonal variationsseasonality of our operations, our quarterly results we have experienced a return to a more traditional demand pattern as new orders were higher in the first halfof operations are not necessarily indicative of the year and home closings increased in each quarter throughoutresults that may be expected for the full year. If and when the homebuilding industry more fully recovers from the recent downturn, we believe these traditional seasonal patterns will continue.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our payments under contractual obligations as of December 31, 20122015:
 
Payments Due by Period
($000’s omitted)
Payments Due by Period
($000’s omitted)
Total 2013 2014-2015 2016-2017 After 2017Total 2016 2017-2018 2019-2020 After 2020
Contractual obligations:                  
Long-term debt (a)
$4,536,577
 $161,093
 $1,047,757
 $731,430
 $2,596,297
$3,317,336
 $564,392
 $767,256
 $134,250
 $1,851,438
Operating lease obligations118,758
 29,526
 47,970
 24,776
 16,486
128,129
 28,561
 39,673
 24,921
 34,974
Other long-term liabilities (b)
2,465
 1,677
 788
 
 
38,261
 23,410
 6,173
 8,678
 
Total contractual obligations (c)
$4,657,800
 $192,296
 $1,096,515
 $756,206
 $2,612,783
$3,483,726
 $616,363
 $813,102
 $167,849
 $1,886,412

(a)Represents principal and interest payments related to our senior notes.notes and term loan.
(b)Represents limited recourse collateralized financing arrangements and related interest payments.
(c)We do not have any payments due in connection with capital lease or long-term purchase obligations.

We are subject to certain obligations associated with entering into contracts (including land option contracts) for the purchase, development, and sale of real estate in the routine conduct of our business. Option contracts for the purchase of land enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise our option, which may serve to reduce our financial risks associated with long-term land holdings. At December 31, 2012,2015, we had $70.1$162.1 million of deposits and pre-acquisition costs, of which $10.5 million is refundable, relating to option agreements to acquire 16,815 homesites42,160 lots with a remaining purchase price of $923.4 million2.0 billion. We expect to acquire approximately halfthe majority of these lotssuch land within the next two years and the remainder thereafter.

At December 31, 2012,2015, we had $170.4$39.0 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits and $31.5$17.2 million of related accrued interest and penalties. We are currently under examination by various taxing jurisdictions and anticipate finalizing the examinations with certain jurisdictions within the next twelve months. However, the final outcome of these examinations is not yet determinable. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years 20032005 - 2012.2015.


3835



The following table summarizes our other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2012:2015:
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
($000’s omitted)
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
($000’s omitted)
Total 2013 2014-2015 2016-2017 After 2017Total 2016 2017-2018 2019-2020 After 2020
Other commercial commitments:                  
Guarantor credit facilities (a)
$204,547
 $54,547
 $150,000
 $
 $
$500,000
 $
 $500,000
 $
 $
Non-guarantor credit facilities (b)
150,000
 150,000
 
 
 
310,000
 310,000
 
 
 
Total commercial commitments (c)
$354,547
 $204,547
 $150,000
 $
 $
$810,000
 $310,000
 $500,000
 $
 $

(a)
The $150.0$500.0 million in 20142016-2017 represents the capacity of our unsecured letter ofrevolving credit facility, ofunder which $124.6no borrowings were outstanding and $191.3 million was outstanding at December 31, 2012, while the $54.5 million in 2013 represents of letters of credit outstanding under our cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements.
were issued at December 31, 2015.
(b)Represents the capacity of the Repurchase Agreement, of which $267.9 million was outstanding at December 31, 2015, and which expires in September 2013.2016. The capacity decreased to $175.0 million on January 19, 2016, and increases to $200.0 million on July 29, 2016.
(c)
The above table excludes an aggregate $1.0$1.0 billion of surety bonds, which typically do not have stated expiration dates.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We use letters of credit and surety bonds to guarantee our performance under various contracts, principally in connection with the development of our homebuilding projects. The expiration dates of the letter of credit contracts coincide with the expected completion date of the related homebuilding projects. If the obligations related to a project are ongoing, annual extensions of the letters of credit are typically granted on a year-to-year basis. At December 31, 20122015, we had outstanding letters of credit of $179.2 million.$191.3 million. Our surety bonds generally do not have stated expiration dates; rather, we are released from the bonds as the contractual performance is completed. These bonds, which approximated $1.0 billion at December 31, 20122015, are typically outstanding over a period of approximately three to five years. Because significant construction and development work has been performed related to the applicable projects but has not yet received final acceptance by the respective counterparties, the aggregate amount of surety bonds outstanding is in excess of the projected cost of the remaining work to be performed.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option agreements in order to procure land for the construction of houses in the future. At December 31, 20122015, these agreements had an aggregate remaining purchase price of $923.4 million2.0 billion. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. In certain instances, we are required to record the land under option as if we own it. At December 31, 2012, we consolidated certain land option agreements and recorded assets of $31.1 million as land, not owned, under option agreements.

At December 31, 20122015, aggregate outstanding debt of unconsolidated joint ventures was $6.916.4 million, of which our proportionate share of such joint venture debt was $1.67.0 million. Of our proportionate share of joint venture debt,this amount, we provided limited recourse guaranties for $0.8$0.2 million at December 31, 20122015. See Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


3936



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with United StatesU.S. generally accepted accounting principles. When more than one accounting principle, or the method of its application, is generally accepted, we select the principle or method that is appropriate in our specific circumstances (see Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Application of these accounting principles requires us to make estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties; as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the consolidated financial statements, giving due regard to materiality.

Revenue recognition

Homebuilding – Homebuilding revenue and related profit are generally recognized at the time of the closing of the sale, when title to and possession of the property are transferred to the buyer. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by Pulte Mortgage, our wholly-owned mortgage subsidiary, and the buyer has not made an adequate initial or continuing investment, the profit on such salessale is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed, unlesscompleted. If there is a loss on the sale in which caseof the property, the loss on such sale is recognized at the time of closing.

Financial Services – Mortgage servicing fees represent fees earned for servicing loans for various investors. Servicing fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal balance, or a contracted set fee in the case of certain sub-servicing arrangements, and are credited to income when related mortgage payments are received or the sub-servicing fees are earned. Loan origination fees, commitment fees, and certain direct loan origination costs are recognized as incurred. Expected gains and losses from the sale of residential mortgage loans and their related servicing rights are included in the measurement of written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through Financial Services revenues at the time of commitment.  Subsequent changes in the fair value of these loans are reflected in Financial Services revenues as they occur. Interest income is accrued from the date a mortgage loan is originated until the loan is sold. Loans are placed on non-accrual status once they become greater than 90 days past due their contractual terms. Subsequent payments received are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan.

Inventory valuationand cost of revenues

Inventory is stated at cost unless the carrying value is determined to not be recoverable, in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes land acquisition, land development, and home construction costs, including interest, real estate taxes, and certain direct and indirect overhead costs related to development and construction. For those communities for which construction and development activities have been idled, applicable interest and real estate taxes are expensed as incurred. Land acquisition and development costs are allocated to individual lots using an average lot cost determined based on the total expected land acquisition and development costs and the total expected home closings for the community. The specific identification method is used to accumulate home construction costs.

We capitalize interest cost into homebuilding inventories. Each layer of capitalized interest is amortized over a period that approximates the average life of communities under development. Interest expense is allocated over the period based on the cyclical timing of home closings.

Cost of revenues includes the construction cost, average lot cost, estimated warranty costs, and commissions and closing costs applicable to the home. The construction cost of the home includes amounts paid through the closing date of the home, plus an appropriate accrual for costs incurred but not yet paid, based on an analysis of budgeted construction costs. This accrual is reviewed for accuracy based on actual payments made after closing compared with the amount accrued, and adjustments are made if needed. Total community land acquisition and development costs are based on an analysis of budgeted costs compared with actual costs incurred to date and estimates to complete. The development cycles for our communities range from under one year to in excess of ten years for certain master planned communities. Adjustments to estimated total land acquisition and development costs for the community affect the amounts costed for the community’s remaining lots.

We record valuation adjustments on land inventory when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and when the cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their carrying amounts. For communities that demonstrate indicators of impairment, we compare the expected undiscounted cash flows for these communities to their carrying value. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, we calculate the fair value of the community. Impairment charges are required to be recorded if the fair value of the community’s inventory is less than its carrying value.

4037




We generally determine the fair value of each community’s inventory using a combination of discounted cash flow models and market comparable transactions, where available. These estimated cash flows are significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices and sale incentives, expected sales paces and cancellation rates, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs. Such estimates must be made for each individual community and may vary significantly between communities. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing, and the long life cycles of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale

In accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”), we use the fair value option for our residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. Election of the fair value option for residential mortgage loans available-for-sale allows a better offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Changes in the fair value of these loans are reflected in revenues as they occur.

Loan origination liabilities

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans sold meetmet certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be at fault,faulty, we either repurchase the loansloan from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a “make-whole” payment).

We sell substantially all ofEstimating the loans we originate to investors in the secondary market within a short period of time after origination. In recent years, we experienced a significant increase inrequired liability for these potential losses as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. In 2006 and 2007, we originated $39.5 billion of loans, excluding loans originated by Centex's former subprime loan business sold by Centex in 2006. Because we generally do not retain the servicing rights to the loans we originate, information regarding the current and historical performance, credit quality, and outstanding balances of such loans is limited. Estimating these loan origination liabilities is further complicated by uncertainties surrounding numerous external factors, such as various macroeconomic factors (including unemployment rates and changes in home prices), actions taken by third parties, including the parties servicing the loans, and the U.S. federal government in its dual capacity as regulator of the U.S. mortgage industry and conservator of the government-sponsored enterprises commonly known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee the majority of mortgage loans in the U.S.

Most requests received to date relate to make-whole payments on loans that have been foreclosed, generally after a portion of the loan principal had been paid down, which reduces our exposure. Requests undergo extensive analysis to confirm the exposure, attempt to cure the identified defect, and, when necessary, determine our liability. We establish liabilities for such anticipated losses based upon, among other things, the level of current unresolved repurchase requests, the volume of estimated probable future repurchase requests, our ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase requests, and the severity of the estimated loss upon repurchase. Determining these estimates and the resulting liability requires a significant level of management judgment. WeDuring 2015 and 2014, we reduced our loan origination liabilities by $11.4 million and $18.6 million, respectively, based on probable settlements of various repurchase requests and current conditions. Reserves provided (released) are generally able to cure or refute over 60% of the requests received from investors such that we do not believe repurchases or make-whole payments will ultimately be required. For those requests that we believe will resultreflected in repurchases or make-whole payments, actual loss severities are expected to approximate 50% of the outstanding principal balance.

During 2012, 2011, and 2010, we recorded additional provisions for losses as a change in estimate primarily to reflect projected claim volumes in excess of previous estimates. Our current estimates assume that such requests will continue through 2014.Financial Services expenses. Given the ongoing volatility in the mortgage industry, our lackchanges in values of visibility into the current status of the review process of loans by investors, the claim volumes we continue to experience,underlying collateral over time, and other uncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, it is reasonably possible that future losses may exceedactual costs could differ from our current estimates. For example, if the total number of loans we are required to repurchase is ultimately 10% lower or higher than our current estimates, the amount of future losses would decrease or increase by approximately $16.0 million.


41



Intangible assets

We have recorded intangible assets related to tradenames acquired with the Centex merger completed in 2009 and the Del Webb merger completed in 2001, which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives. The carrying values and ultimate realization of these assets are dependent upon estimates of future earningscash flows and benefits that we expect to generate from their use. If we determine that the carrying values of intangible assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators of impairment, we use a projected undiscounted cash flow method to determine if impairment exists. If the carrying values of the intangible assets exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, then we measure impairment as the difference between the fair value of the asset and the recorded carrying value. While the industry downturn in recent years has resulted in a decline in the fair value of these intangible assets, this decline has not yet resulted in an impairment of the assets' carrying values.To date, no impairments relating to tradenames have been recorded. However, if our expectations of future results and cash flows decrease significantly, or if our strategy related to the use of the intangible assets changes, the related intangible assets may bebecome impaired.

Allowance for warranties

Home purchasers are provided with a limited warranty against certain building defects, including a one-year comprehensive limited warranty and coverage for certain other aspects of the home’s construction and operating systems for periods of up to ten years. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and the cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liability for each geographic market in which we operate and adjust the amounts as necessary. Actual warranty costs in the future could differ from our estimates.

Self-insured risks

We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance coverage. We also maintain builders' risk, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of the risk of loss from claims. However, we retain a significant portion of the overall risk for such claims either through policies issued by our captive insurance subsidiaries or through our own self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and claims in excess of available insurance policy limits.

Our general liability insurance includes coverage for certain construction defects. While construction defect claims can relate to a variety of circumstances, the majority of our claims relate to alleged problems with siding, plumbing, foundations and other concrete work, windows, roofing, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. The availability of general liability insurance for the homebuilding industry and its subcontractors has become increasingly limited, and the insurance policies available require companies to maintain higher per occurrence and aggregate retention levels. In certain instances, we may offer our subcontractors the opportunity to purchase insurance through one of our captive insurance subsidiaries or to participate in a project-specific insurance program provided by the Company. Policies issued by the captive insurance subsidiaries represent self-insurance of these risks by the Company. This self-insured exposure is limited by reinsurance policies that we purchase. General liability coverage for the homebuilding industry is complex, and our coverage varies from policy year to policy year. Our insurance coverage requires a per occurrence deductible up to an overall aggregate retention level. Beginning with the first dollar, amounts paid on insured claims satisfy our per occurrence and aggregate retention obligations. Any amounts incurred in excess of the occurrence or aggregate retention levels are covered by insurance up to our purchased coverage levels. Our insurance policies, including the captive insurance subsidiaries' reinsurance policies, are maintained with highly-rated underwriters for whom we believe counterparty default risk is not significant.

At any point in time, we are managing over 1,000 individual claims related to general liability, property, errors and omission, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. We reserve for costs associated with such claims (including expected claims management expenses relating to legal fees, expert fees, and claims handling expenses) on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims. The actuarial analyses calculate an estimate of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates for incurred but not reported losses ("IBNR"). IBNR represents losses related to claims incurred but not yet reported plus development on reported claims. These estimates make up a significant portion of our liability and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to a variety of factors, including changes in claims reporting and resolution patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent. State regulations vary, but construction defect claims are reported and resolved over an extended period often exceeding ten years. In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies or from our subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable.

42



The recorded reserves include loss estimates related to both (i) existing claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 74% and 78% of the total general liability reserves, which represent the vast majority of the total recorded reserves, at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determine the IBNR portion of reserves consider a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of the reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses.

Adjustments to estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. Because the majority of our recorded reserves relates to IBNR, adjustments to reserve amounts for individual existing claims generally do not impact the recorded reserves materially. However, changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and the estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves.

We have experienced a high level of insurance-related expenses in recent years, primarily due to the adverse development of general liability claims, the frequency and severity of which have increased significantly over historical levels. During 2010, we experienced a greater than anticipated frequency of newly reported claims and a significant increase in specific case reserves related to certain known claims. The general nature of these claims was not out of the ordinary, but the frequency and severity of the claims were in excess of our historical experience. As a result of these unfavorable trends, we recorded additional reserves totaling $280.4 million ($0.74 per basic and diluted share) within selling, general, and administrative expenses. Substantially all of this additional reserve related to general liability exposures, a large portion of which resulted from revising our actuarial assumptions surrounding the long-term frequency, severity, and development of claims. During the industry downturn over the last several years, and especially in 2010, we experienced adverse claim frequency and severity compared with longer term averages. In 2010, we deemed it appropriate to assume that the long-term future frequency, severity, and development of claims will most closely resemble the claims activity experienced in recent years.

Our recorded reserves for all such claims totaled $721.3 million and $739.0 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, the vast majority of which relate to general liability claims. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs. Based on the actuarial analyses performed, we believe the range of reasonably possible losses related to these claims is $650 million to $800 million. While this range represents our best estimate of our ultimate liability related to these claims, due to a variety of factors, including those factors described above, there can be no assurance that the ultimate costs realized by us will fall within this range.

Income taxes

We follow the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions. Evaluations of our tax positions consider changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and settlements of audit issues.

We calculate our provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in ourthe financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required.

We continue to analyze all available positive and negative evidence in determining the continuing need for a valuation allowance. This evaluation considers, among other factors, historical operating results, forecasts of future profitability, and the duration of statutory carryforward periods. One of the primary pieces of negative evidence we consider is the significant losses we have incurred in recent years, including being in a significant three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position at December 31, 2012. Other negative evidence includes a challenging U.S. macroeconomic environment and uncertainty regarding the timing of a broad, sustainable recovery in the homebuilding industry. However, we earned a profit before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2012 and have seen significant increases in new orders, backlog, and home sale gross margin. If current business trends continue, including continued improvements in the homebuilding industry, and we continue to be profitable, we believe that there could be sufficient positive evidence to support reducing a large portion of the valuation allowance during

4338



2013. Realizationis required.  Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Unrecognized tax benefits represent the difference between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. We follow the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.  Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions.  Our evaluations of tax positions consider a variety of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and effective settlements of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in income tax expense (benefit) in the period in which the change is made. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as a component of income tax expense (benefit).

Self-insured risks

At any point in time, we are managing over 1,000 individual claims related to general liability, property, errors and omission, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. We reserve for costs associated with such claims (including expected claims management expenses) on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and periodically evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims. The actuarial analyses calculate an estimate of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates for incurred but not reported losses ("IBNR"). IBNR represents losses related to claims incurred but not yet reported plus development on reported claims. In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our deferred tax assets for state NOL carryforwardscosts under various insurance policies or from our subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable.

Housing market conditions have been volatile across most of our markets over the past ten years, and other items, however, is more unlikely thanwe believe such conditions can affect the realizationfrequency and cost of federal deferred tax assets. This isconstruction defect claims. Additionally, IBNR estimates comprise the majority of our liability and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to a variety of factors, including changes in claims reporting and resolution patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, the need to generate sufficient taxable incomeregulatory environment, and legal precedent. State regulations vary, but construction defect claims are reported and resolved over an extended period often exceeding ten years. Changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves. Additionally, the amount of insurance coverage available for each policy period also impacts our recorded reserves. Because of the respective jurisdictions priorinherent uncertainty in estimating future losses and the timing of such losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs.

Adjustments to reserves are recorded in the expirationsperiod in which the change in estimate occurs. During 2015, we recorded general liability reserve reversals of $32.6 million resulting from a legal settlement and $29.6 million related to changes in our actuarial estimates resulting from favorable claims experience relative to previous actuarial projections. During 2014, we increased general liability insurance reserves by $69.3 million, which was primarily driven by estimated costs associated with siding repairs in certain previously completed communities that, in turn, impacted actuarial estimates for potential future claims.

Our recorded reserves for all such claims totaled $692.1 million and $710.2 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the vast majority of which relate to general liability claims. The recorded reserves include loss estimates related to both (i) existing claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 65% and 72% of the various state carryforward periods, sometotal general liability reserves at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determine the IBNR portion of reserves consider a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which expire sooner thanare based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of the 20-year federal NOL carryforwards.reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs. Based on the actuarial analyses performed, we believe the range of reasonably possible losses related to these claims is $625 million to $800 million. While this range represents our best estimate of our ultimate liability related to these claims, due to a variety of factors, including those factors described above, there can be no assurance that the ultimate costs realized by us will fall within this range.


New accounting pronouncements
39


See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to market risk on our debt instruments primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates. We utilize both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. For fixed-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt instrument but not our earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not affect the fair value of the debt instrument but could affect our earnings and cash flows. Except in very limited circumstances, we do not have an obligation to prepay fixed-rate debt prior to maturity. As a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair value should not have a significant impact on our rate-sensitive financingsfixed-rate debt until we are required or elect to the extent long-term rates decline. refinance or repurchase such debt.

The following tables set forth as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, our rate-sensitive financing obligations,the principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted-average interest rates, and estimated fair value of our debt obligations as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 ($000’s omitted).
As of December 31, 2012 for the
Years ending December 31,
As of December 31, 2015 for the
Years ending December 31,
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
Rate-sensitive liabilities:                              
Fixed interest rate debt:               
Senior notes$
 $398,852
 $369,222
 $465,245
 $150,000
 $1,150,000
 $2,533,319
 $2,663,451
Fixed rate debt$487,485
 $128,296
 $
 $3,900
 $3,900
 $1,000,000
 $1,623,581
 $1,678,987
Average interest rate6.24% 7.00% % 5.00% 5.00% 6.71% 6.57%  
               
Variable rate debt (a)
$267,877
 $500,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $767,877
 $767,877
Average interest rate% 5.49% 5.24% 6.50% 7.63% 6.80% 6.36%  2.65% 1.42% % % % % 1.85%  
                              
As of December 31, 2011 for the
Years ending December 31,
As of December 31, 2014 for the
Years ending December 31,
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
Rate-sensitive liabilities:                              
Fixed interest rate debt:               
Senior notes$96,393
 $182,221
 $574,590
 $492,491
 $480,000
 $1,300,000
 $3,125,695
 $2,765,151
Fixed rate debt$239,203
 $488,610
 $129,433
 $
 $3,900
 $1,003,900
 $1,865,046
 $1,975,029
Average interest rate5.45% 5.51% 5.50% 5.23% 6.50% 6.89% 6.19%  5.22% 6.24% 7.44% % 5.00% 6.71% 6.44%  
               
Variable rate debt (a)
$140,241
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $140,241
 $140,241
Average interest rate2.70% % % % % % 2.70%  
(a) Includes the Pulte Mortgage Repurchase Agreement and the Term Loan. Does not include our Revolving Credit Facility, under which there were no borrowings outstanding at either December 31, 2015 or 2014.

Derivative instruments and hedging activities

Pulte Mortgage is exposed to market risks from commitments to lend, movements in interest rates, and canceled or modified commitments to lend. A commitment to lend at a specific interest rate (an interest rate lock commitment) is a derivative financial instrument (interest rate is locked to the borrower). The interest rate risk continues through the loan closing and until the loan is sold to an investor. We are generally not exposed to variability in cash flows of derivative instruments for more than approximately 6075 days. In periods of rising interest rates, the length of exposure will generally increase due to customers locking in an interest rate sooner as opposed to letting the interest rate float. In periods of low or decreasing interest rates, the length of exposure will also generally increase as customers desire to lock before the possibility of rising rates.

In order to reduce these risks, we use other derivative financial instruments, principally cash forward placement contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments, to economically hedge the interest rate lock commitment. We generally enter into one of the aforementioned derivative financial instruments upon accepting interest rate lock commitments. Changes in the fair value of interest rate lock commitments and the other derivative financial instruments are recognized in Financial Services revenues. We do not use any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, residential mortgage loans available-for-sale had an aggregate fair value of $442.7 million and $339.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had aggregate interest rate lock commitments of $208.2 million and $146.1 million, respectively, which were originated at interest rates prevailing at the date of commitment. Unexpired forward contracts totaled $525.0 million and $371.0 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and

40



whole loan investor commitments totaled $77.6 million and $63.5 million, respectively, at such dates. Hypothetical changes in the fair values of our financial instruments arising from immediate parallel shifts in long-term mortgage rates of 50, 100, and 150 basis points would not be material to our financial results.results due to the offsetting nature in the movements in fair value of our financial instruments.


44



SPECIAL NOTES CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

As a cautionary note, except for the historical information contained herein, certain matters discussed in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 7a, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities, as well as those of the markets we serve or intend to serve, to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate to matters of a strictly factual or historical nature and generally discuss or relate to forecasts, estimates or other expectations regarding future events. Generally, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “may,” “can,” “could,” “might,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, including statements related to expected operating and performing results, planned transactions, planned objectives of management, future developments or conditions in the industries in which we participate and other trends, developments and uncertainties that may affect our business in the future.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among other things: interest rate changes and the availability of mortgage financing; continued volatility in the debt and equity markets; competition within the industries in which PulteGroup operates;we operate; the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by PulteGroupus in itsour homebuilding operations; the impact of any changes to our strategy in responding to continuing adverse conditions inthe cyclical nature of the industry, including any changes regarding our land positions; the availability and cost of insurance covering risks associated with PulteGroup'sour businesses; shortages and the cost of labor; weather related slowdowns; slow growth initiatives and/or local building moratoria; governmental regulation directed at or affecting the housing market, the homebuilding industry or construction activities; uncertainty in the mortgage lending industry, including revisions to underwriting standards and repurchase requirements associated with the sale of mortgage loans; the interpretation of or changes to tax, labor and environmental laws; economic changes nationally or in PulteGroup'sour local markets, including inflation, deflation, changes in consumer confidence and preferences and the state of the market for homes in general; legal or regulatory proceedings or claims; our ability to generate sufficient cash flow in order to successfully implement our capital allocation priorities; required accounting changes; terrorist acts and other acts of war; and other factors of national, regional and global scale, including those of a political, economic, business and competitive nature. See Item 1A – Risk Factors for a further discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties applicable to PulteGroup’s business. PulteGroup undertakesour businesses. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or changes in PulteGroup'sour expectations.



4541



ITEM 8.      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 20122015 and 20112014
($000’s omitted, except per share data)
 
2012 20112015 2014
ASSETS      
Cash and equivalents$1,404,760
 $1,083,071
$754,161
 $1,292,862
Restricted cash71,950
 101,860
21,274
 16,358
House and land inventory4,214,046
 4,636,468
5,450,058
 4,392,100
Land held for sale91,104
 135,307
81,492
 101,190
Land, not owned, under option agreements31,066
 24,905
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale318,931
 258,075
442,715
 339,531
Investments in unconsolidated entities45,629
 35,988
41,267
 40,368
Other assets407,675
 447,598
671,099
 543,218
Intangible assets149,248
 162,348
110,215
 123,115
Deferred tax assets, net1,394,879
 1,720,668
$6,734,409
 $6,885,620
$8,967,160
 $8,569,410
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Liabilities:      
Accounts payable, including book overdrafts of $42,053 and $48,380 in 2012 and 2011,
respectively
$178,274
 $196,447
Accounts payable, including book overdrafts of $60,547 and $32,586 in 2015 and 2014, respectively$327,725
 $270,516
Customer deposits101,183
 46,960
186,141
 142,642
Accrued and other liabilities1,418,063
 1,411,941
1,284,273
 1,343,774
Income tax liabilities198,865
 203,313
57,050
 48,722
Financial Services debt138,795
 
267,877
 140,241
Term loan500,000
 
Senior notes2,509,613
 3,088,344
1,584,769
 1,818,561
Total liabilities4,544,793
 4,947,005
4,207,835
 3,764,456
Shareholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued$
 $
$
 $
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized, 386,608,436 and
382,607,543 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011,
respectively
3,866
 3,826
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 349,148,351 and 369,458,530 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively3,491
 3,695
Additional paid-in capital3,030,889
 2,986,240
3,093,802
 3,072,996
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(992) (1,306)(609) (690)
Accumulated deficit(844,147) (1,050,145)
Retained earnings1,662,641
 1,728,953
Total shareholders’ equity2,189,616
 1,938,615
4,759,325
 4,804,954
$6,734,409
 $6,885,620
$8,967,160
 $8,569,410
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


4642



PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
 
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Revenues:          
Homebuilding          
Home sale revenues$4,552,412
 $3,950,743
 $4,419,812
$5,792,675
 $5,662,171
 $5,424,309
Land sale revenues106,698
 82,853
 27,815
48,536
 34,554
 114,335
4,659,110
 4,033,596
 4,447,627
5,841,211
 5,696,725
 5,538,644
Financial Services160,888
 103,094
 121,663
140,753
 125,638
 140,951
Total revenues4,819,998
 4,136,690
 4,569,290
5,981,964
 5,822,363
 5,679,595
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:          
Home sale cost of revenues3,833,451
 3,444,398
 4,006,385
4,440,893
 4,343,249
 4,310,528
Land sale cost of revenues94,880
 59,279
 53,555
35,858
 23,748
 104,426
3,928,331
 3,503,677
 4,059,940
4,476,751
 4,366,997
 4,414,954
Financial Services expenses135,511
 137,666
 116,122
82,047
 71,057
 92,242
Selling, general and administrative expenses514,457
 519,583
 895,102
Other expense (income), net66,298
 293,102
 742,385
Interest income(4,913) (5,055) (9,531)
Interest expense819
 1,313
 2,729
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities(4,059) (3,296) (2,911)
Income (loss) before income taxes183,554
 (310,300) (1,234,546)
Selling, general, and administrative expenses589,780
 667,815
 568,500
Other expense, net17,363
 26,736
 76,077
Income before income taxes816,023
 689,758
 527,822
Income tax expense (benefit)(22,591) (99,912) (137,817)321,933
 215,420
 (2,092,294)
Net income (loss)$206,145
 $(210,388) $(1,096,729)
Net income$494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
     
 
 
Net income (loss) per share:     
Net income per share:     
Basic$0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90)$1.38
 $1.27
 $6.79
Diluted$0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90)$1.36
 $1.26
 $6.72
Cash dividends declared$0.33
 $0.23
 $0.15
          
Number of shares used in calculation:          
Basic381,562
 379,877
 378,585
356,576
 370,377
 383,077
Effect of dilutive securities3,002
 
 
3,217
 3,725
 3,789
Diluted384,564
 379,877
 378,585
359,793
 374,102
 386,866









See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4743



PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the years ended December 31, 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013
(000’s omitted, except per share data)omitted)
 

 2012 2011 2010
Net income (loss)$206,145
 $(210,388) $(1,096,729)
      
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:     
Change in fair value of derivatives314
 213
 724
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 6
Other comprehensive income314
 213
 730
      
Comprehensive income (loss)$206,459
 $(210,175) $(1,095,999)
 2015 2014 2013
Net income$494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
      
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:     
Change in value of derivatives81
 105
 197
Other comprehensive income81
 105
 197
      
Comprehensive income$494,171
 $474,443
 $2,620,313




See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




4844



PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013
(000’s omitted, except per share data)

 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 Total
Shares $ 
Shareholders' Equity, January 1, 2010380,690
 $3,807
 $2,935,737
 $(2,249) $257,145
 $3,194,440
Stock option exercises902
 9
 8,659
 
 
 8,668
Stock awards, net of cancellations884
 9
 (9) 
 
 
Stock repurchases(448) (5) (3,549) 
 (469) (4,023)
Stock-based compensation
 
 32,081
 
 
 32,081
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 (1,096,729) (1,096,729)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 730
 
 730
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2010382,028
 $3,820
 $2,972,919
 $(1,519) $(840,053) $2,135,167
Stock awards, net of cancellations944
 10
 (10) 
 
 
Stock repurchases(364) (4) (3,128) 
 296
 (2,836)
Stock-based compensation
 
 16,459
 
 
 16,459
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 (210,388) (210,388)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 213
 
 213
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2011382,608
 $3,826
 $2,986,240
 $(1,306) $(1,050,145) $1,938,615
Stock option exercises2,877
 29
 32,780
 
 
 32,809
Stock awards, net of cancellations1,228
 12
 (12) 
 
 
Stock repurchases(105) (1) (813) 
 (147) (961)
Stock-based compensation
 
 12,694
 
 
 12,694
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 206,145
 206,145
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 314
 
 314
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2012386,608
 $3,866
 $3,030,889
 $(992) $(844,147) $2,189,616
 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 Total
Shares $ 
Shareholders' Equity, January 1, 2013386,608
 $3,866
 $3,030,889
 $(992) $(844,147) $2,189,616
Stock option exercises1,432
 14
 19,397
 
 
 19,411
Share issuances, net of cancellations1,002
 10
 (10) 
 
 
Dividends declared
 
 
 
 (57,530) (57,530)
Share repurchases(7,742) (77) (3,063) 
 (124,521) (127,661)
Share-based compensation
 
 14,474
 
 
 14,474
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from share-based compensation
 
 (9,671) 
 
 (9,671)
Net income
 
 
 
 2,620,116
 2,620,116
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 197
 
 197
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2013381,300
 $3,813
 $3,052,016
 $(795) $1,593,918
 $4,648,952
Stock option exercises1,422
 14
 15,613
 
 
 15,627
Share issuances, net of cancellations(43) 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared
 
 72
 
 (86,442) (86,370)
Share repurchases(13,220) (132) 
 
 (252,887) (253,019)
Share-based compensation
 
 13,786
 
 26
 13,812
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from share-based compensation
 
 (8,491) 
 
 (8,491)
Net income
 
 
 
 474,338
 474,338
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 105
 
 105
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2014369,459
 $3,695
 $3,072,996
 $(690) $1,728,953
 $4,804,954
Stock option exercises904
 9
 10,525
 
 
 10,534
Share issuances, net of cancellations428
 4
 7,420
 
 

 7,424
Dividends declared
 
 8
 
 (117,881) (117,873)
Share repurchases(21,642) (217) 
 
 (442,521) (442,738)
Share-based compensation
 
 16,888
 
 
 16,888
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from share-based compensation
 
 (14,035) 
 
 (14,035)
Net income
 
 
 
 494,090
 494,090
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 81
 
 81
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2015349,149
 $3,491
 $3,093,802
 $(609) $1,662,641
 $4,759,325
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4945



PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013
($000’s omitted)
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income (loss)$206,145
 $(210,388) $(1,096,729)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities:
     
Net income$494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:     
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)311,699
 223,769
 (2,096,425)
Write-down of land and deposits and pre-acquisition costs17,195
 35,786
 214,444
11,467
 11,168
 9,672
Goodwill impairments
 240,541
 656,298
Depreciation and amortization30,027
 32,098
 45,660
46,222
 39,864
 31,587
Stock-based compensation expense22,897
 16,970
 32,081
Share-based compensation expense24,752
 29,292
 30,480
Loss on debt retirements32,071
 5,638
 38,920

 8,584
 26,930
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities(4,059) (3,296) (2,911)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities7,488
 7,083
 5,512
Other non-cash, net10,356
 12,188
 11,539
Other, net5,605
 6,091
 10,294
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:          
Restricted cash1,257
 5,940
 7,775
(8,626) 1,368
 3,387
Inventories455,223
 54,891
 (28,754)(927,768) (346,596) 265,064
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale(60,828) (82,113) (7,991)(104,609) (53,734) 28,448
Other assets26,014
 182,471
 970,305
(177,063) (46,249) (38,190)
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities20,802
 (189,435) (187,512)(23,898) (38,646) (10,227)
Income tax liabilities(4,448) (91,095) (66,513)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities760,140
 17,279
 592,124
(348,129) 309,249
 881,136
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Distributions from unconsolidated entities3,029
 4,531
 4,231
Investments in unconsolidated entities(16,456) (4,603) (22,890)
Net change in loans held for investment836
 325
 12,603
8,664
 335
 (12,265)
Change in restricted cash related to letters of credit28,653
 (83,199) 
3,710
 54,989
 (4,152)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment7,586
 10,555
 1,780
Capital expenditures(13,942) (21,238) (15,179)(45,440) (48,790) (28,899)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities9,706
 (93,629) (19,455)
Cash used for business acquisition
 (82,419) 
Other investing activities, net2,212
 8,261
 (661)
Net cash used in investing activities(30,854) (67,624) (45,977)
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from debt issuance500,000
 
 
Repayments of debt
(239,193) (250,631) (479,827)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility125,000
 
 
Repayments under revolving credit facility(125,000) 
 
Financial Services borrowings (repayments)138,795
 
 (18,394)127,636
 34,577
 (33,131)
Other borrowings (repayments)(618,800) (321,133) (935,917)
Stock option exercises32,809
 
 8,668
10,535
 15,627
 19,411
Stock repurchases(961) (2,836) (4,023)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(448,157) (323,969) (949,666)
Share repurchases(442,738) (253,019) (127,661)
Dividends paid(115,958) (75,646) (38,382)
Net cash used in financing activities(159,718) (529,092) (659,590)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents321,689
 (400,319) (376,997)(538,701) (287,467) 175,569
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period1,083,071
 1,483,390
 1,860,387
1,292,862
 1,580,329
 1,404,760
Cash and equivalents at end of period$1,404,760
 $1,083,071
 $1,483,390
$754,161
 $1,292,862
 $1,580,329
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:          
Interest paid (capitalized), net$(1,470) $(9,623) $18,367
$(4,193) $(4,561) $(171)
Income taxes paid (refunded), net$(13,322) $(62,167) $(941,283)$(5,654) $1,030
 $373
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5046



PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

1. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

PulteGroup, Inc. is one of the largest homebuilders in the United States,U.S., and our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “PHM”. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "PulteGroup", the "Company", "we", "us", and "our" used herein refer to PulteGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries. While our subsidiaries engage primarily in the homebuilding business, we also have mortgage banking operations, conducted principally through Pulte Mortgage LLC (“Pulte Mortgage”), and title operations.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of PulteGroup, Inc. and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and variable interest entities in which PulteGroup, Inc. is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany accounts, transactions, and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business acquisitions

We acquired certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014 for $82.4 million in cash and the assumption of certain payables related to such assets. The net assets acquired were located primarily in Columbus, Ohio, and Louisville, Kentucky, and included approximately 8,200 lots, including approximately 400 homes in inventory and control of approximately 900 lots through land option contracts. We also assumed a sales order backlog of 622 homes. The acquired net assets were recorded at their estimated fair values. The acquisition of these assets was not material to our results of operations or financial condition.

We acquired substantially all of the assets of JW Homes, including the brand John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, in a series of transactions in January 2016 for approximately $430.0 million in cash (of which approximately $13.0 million is expected to be paid subsequent to January 2016) and the assumption of certain payables related to such assets. The net assets acquired were located primarily in Atlanta, Charleston, Charlotte, Nashville, and Raleigh and included approximately 7,000 lots, including approximately 400 homes in inventory and control of approximately 1,300 lots through land option contracts. We also assumed a sales order backlog of approximately 300 homes. The acquired net assets will be recorded at their estimated fair values. The acquisition of these assets is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

ReclassificationReclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Subsequent events

We evaluated subsequent events up until the time the financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

Cash and equivalents

Cash and equivalents include institutional money market investments and time deposits with a maturity of three months or less when acquired. Cash and equivalents at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 also included $8.1$27.5 million and $13.05.1 million, respectively, of cash from home closings held in escrow for our benefit, typically for less than five days, which are considered deposits in-transit.


47


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Restricted cash

We maintain certain cash balances that are restricted as to their use. Restricted cash consists primarily of deposits maintained with financial institutions under certain cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements (see Note 7). The remaining balances relate to certain other accounts with restrictions,use, including customer deposits on home sales that are temporarily restricted by regulatory requirements until title transfers to the homebuyer.

Investments in unconsolidated entities

We have investments in a number of unconsolidated entities, including joint ventures, with independent third parties. Some of these unconsolidated entities purchase, develop, and/or sell land and homes in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. The equity method of accounting is used for unconsolidated entities over which we have significant influence; generally this represents ownership interests of at least 20% and not more than 50%. Under the equity method of accounting, we recognize our proportionate share of the profitsearnings and losses of these entities. Certain of these entities sell land to us. In these situations, weWe defer the recognition of profits from such activities until the time we ultimately sell the related homes are sold. The cost method of accounting is used for investments in which we have less than a 20% ownership interest and do not have the ability to exercise significant influence.land.


51


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for recoverability in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 323, “Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures” (“ASC 323”). If we determine that a loss in the value of the investment is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its estimated fair value. Any such losses are recorded to equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, each unconsolidated entity evaluates its long-lived assets, such as inventory, for recoverability in accordance with ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment – Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“ASC 360-10”). Our proportionate share of any such impairments is also recorded to equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Evaluations of recoverability under both ASC 323 and ASC 360-10 are primarily based on projected cash flows.entities. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and the significant volatility in demand for new housing, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. See Note 65.

Notes receivable

In certain instances, we may accept consideration for land sales or other transactions in the form of a note receivable. We consider the creditworthiness of the counterparty when evaluating the relative risk and return involved in pursuing the applicable transaction. Due to the unique facts and circumstances surrounding each receivable, we assess the need for an allowance for each receivable on an individual basis. Factors considered as part of this assessment include the counterparty's payment history, the value of any underlying collateral, communications with the counterparty, knowledge of the counterparty's financial condition and plans, and the current and expected economic environment. Allowances are generally recorded in other expense (income), net when it becomes likely that some amount will not be collectible. Such receivables are reported net of allowance for credit losses within other assets. Notes receivable are written off when it is determined that collection efforts will no longer be pursued. Interest income is recognized as earned.

The following represents our notes receivable and related allowance for credit losses ($000’s omitted):
 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
Notes receivable, gross$57,841
 $78,834
Allowance for credit losses(26,865) (41,647)
Notes receivable, net$30,976
 $37,187

The decrease in the allowance for credit losses during 2012 relates primarily to settlement of a note receivable, for which an allowance had been recorded in previous periods, for an amount that approximated the note receivable's net book value. We also record other receivables from various parties in the normal course of business, including amounts due from municipalities, insurance companies, and vendors. Such receivables are generally non-interest bearing and non-collateralized, payable either on demand or upon the occurrence of a specified event, and are generally reported in other assets. See Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale in Note 1 for a discussion of our receivables related to mortgage operations.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets consist of trademarks and tradenames acquired in connection with the 2009 acquisition of Centex Corporation ("Centex") and the 2001 acquisition of Del Webb Corporation ("Del Webb"). These intangible assets were valued at the acquisition date and are being amortized over 20-year lives. The acquired cost and accumulated amortization of our intangible assets were $259.0$259.0 million and $109.8$148.8 million,, respectively, at December 31, 2012,2015, and $259.0$259.0 million and $96.7$135.9 million,, respectively, at December 31, 2011.2014. Amortization expense totaled $13.1$12.9 million, $13.0 million and $13.1 million in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 20102013, respectively, and is expected to be $13.1$12.9 million in each of the next five years.

The ultimate realization of these assets is dependent upon estimates of future earningscash flows and benefits that we expect to generate from their use. If we determine that the carrying values of intangible assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators of impairment, we use a projected undiscounted cash flow method to determine if impairment exists. If the carrying values of the intangible assets exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, then we measure impairment as the difference between the fair value of the asset and the recorded carrying value. There were no impairments of intangible assetstradenames during 20122015, 20112014, or 20102013.


52


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Goodwill

Goodwill represents the cost of acquired companies in excess of the fair value of the net assets of such companies at the acquisition date. Recorded goodwill is allocated to our reporting units based on the relative fair value of each acquired reporting unit. We assess the goodwill balance of each reporting unit for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount might not be recoverable. All goodwill was written-off as of December 31, 2011. See Note 2.

Property and equipment, net, and depreciation

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives as follows: vehicles, three to seven years, model andhome furniture - two years; office furniture two to three years, and equipment - three to ten years. years; and leasehold improvements - life of the lease. Property and equipment are included in other assets and totaled $44.2$86.3 million net of accumulated depreciation of $190.1$185.8 million at December 31, 20122015 and $53.2$75.2 million net of accumulated depreciation of $203.4$192.2 million at December 31, 2011.2014. Depreciation expense totaled $16.9$33.3 million,, $19.0 $26.8 million,, and $32.5$18.5 million in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively.

Advertising costs

Advertising costs are expensed to selling, general, and administrative expense as incurred and totaled $45.8$45.3 million,, $55.1 $41.8 million,, and $54.9$42.4 million,, in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively.

Employee benefits

We maintain defined contribution retirement plans that cover substantially all of our employees. Company contributions to these plans were suspended during 2010 and 2011, but were reinstated in 2012. Company contributions pursuant to the plans totaled $12.6 million, $12.1 million, and $11.0 million in 2015, 2014, and $9.4 million2013 in 2012., respectively.

48


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Other expense, (income), net

Other expense, (income), net consists of the following ($000’s omitted): 
 2012 2011 2010
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 4)
$2,278
 $10,002
 $5,594
Loss on debt retirements (Note 7)
32,071
 5,638
 38,920
Lease exit and related costs (Note 3) (a)
7,306
 9,900
 28,378
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
13,100
 13,100
 13,100
Goodwill impairments (Note 2)

 240,541
 656,298
Miscellaneous expense (income), net11,543
 13,921
 95
 $66,298
 $293,102
 $742,385

 2015 2014 2013
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 3)
$5,021
 $6,099
 $3,122
Loss on debt retirements (Note 6)

 8,584
 26,930
Lease exit and related costs2,463
 9,609
 2,778
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
12,900
 13,033
 13,100
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities (Note 5)
(7,355) (8,226) (993)
Interest income(3,107) (4,632) (4,395)
Interest expense788
 849
 712
Miscellaneous, net (a)
6,653
 1,420
 34,823
 $17,363
 $26,736
 $76,077
(a)
Excludes lease exit costs classified within Financial Services expensesMiscellaneous, net includes a charge of $20.0 million in 2015 resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12$0.5 million, $0.1 million,) and $2.9charges totaling $41.2 million in 2013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community (seeNote 122012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.).

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders (the “numerator”“Numerator”) by the weighted-average number of common shares, adjusted for non-vestedunvested shares, of restricted stock (the “denominator”“Denominator”) for the period. Computing diluted earnings per share is similar to computing basic earnings per share, except that the denominatorDenominator is increased to include the dilutive effects of stock options, non-vestedunvested restricted stock,shares and restricted share units, and other potentially dilutive instruments. Any stock options that have an exercise price greater than the average market price of our common shares are considered to be anti-dilutive and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. EarningsOur earnings per share excludes 16.6excluded 3.9 million, out-of-the-money stock options 6.6 million, and other9.6 million potentially dilutive instruments, in 2012. Allincluding stock options, non-vestedunvested restricted shares, and unvested restricted share units, in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

In accordance with ASC 260 "Earnings Per Share" ("ASC 260"), the two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and other potentially dilutive instruments were excluded fromparticipating securities according to an earnings allocation formula that adjusts the calculation during 2011Numerator for dividends or dividend equivalents and 2010 due to the net loss recorded during the periods.


53


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and, therefore, are included in computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. Although ourOur outstanding restricted stockshare awards, restricted share units, and restricted stock unitsdeferred shares are considered participating securities, there were nosecurities.

49


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The following table presents the earnings attributable to restricted shareholders during 2012, 2011, or 2010.per common share (000's omitted, except per share data):

 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Numerator:     
Net income$494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
Less: earnings distributed to participating securities(755) (583) (407)
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities(2,448) (2,668) (19,201)
Numerator for basic earnings per share$490,887
 $471,087
 $2,600,508
Add back: undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities2,448
 2,668
 19,201
Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to participating securities(2,429) (2,643) (18,845)
Numerator for diluted earnings per share$490,906
 $471,112
 $2,600,864
      
Denominator:     
Basic shares outstanding356,576
 370,377
 383,077
Effect of dilutive securities3,217
 3,725
 3,789
Diluted shares outstanding359,793
 374,102
 386,866
      
Earnings per share:     
Basic$1.38
 $1.27
 $6.79
Diluted$1.36
 $1.26
 $6.72

 Stock-basedShare-based compensation

We measure compensation cost for stock optionsrestricted shares and restricted share units at fair value on the grant date and recognize compensation expense on the graded vesting method over the vesting period. The graded vesting method provides for vesting of portions of the overall awards at interim dates and results in greater expense in earlier years than the straight-line method. The fairdate. Fair value of our stock options is determined using primarily the Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock is determined based on the quoted price of our common stockshares on the grant date. We recognize compensation expense for restricted stock grants,shares and restricted share units, the majority of which cliff vest at the end of three years, ratably over the vesting period. For share-based awards containing performance conditions, we recognize compensation expense ratably over the vesting period when it is probable that the stated performance targets will be achieved and record cumulative adjustments in the period in which estimates change. Compensation expense related to our share-based awards is included in selling, general, and administrative expense, except for a small portion recognized in Financial Services expenses. See Note 98.

Income taxes

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.  In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income.  In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required.  Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

50


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Unrecognized tax benefits represent the difference between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. We follow the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.  Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions.  Our evaluations of tax positions consider a variety of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and effective settlements of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in income tax expense (benefit) in the period in which the change is made. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as a component of income tax expense (benefit).

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.  In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required.  Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations or financial position. See Note 109.

Homebuilding revenue recognition

Homebuilding revenue and related profit are generally recognized at the closing of the sale, when title to and possession of the property are transferred to the buyer. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by Pulte Mortgage and the buyer has not made an adequate initial or continuing investment, the profit on such sale is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed, unlesscompleted. If there is a loss on the sale in which caseof the property, the loss on such sale is recognized at the time of closing. Such amountsThe amount of such deferred profits were not material at either December 31, 20122015 or December 31, 20112014.

Sales incentives

When sales incentives involve a discount on the selling price of the home, we record the discount as a reduction of revenue at the time of house closing. If the sales incentive requires us to provide a free product or service to the customer, the cost of the free product or service is recorded as cost of revenues at the time of house closing. This includes the cost related to optional upgrades and seller-paid financing costs, closing costs, homeowners’ association fees, or merchandise.

54


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Inventory and cost of revenues

Inventory is stated at cost unless the carrying value is determined to not be recoverable, in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes land acquisition, land development, and home construction costs, including interest, real estate taxes, and certain direct and indirect overhead costs related to development and construction. For those communities for which construction and development activities have been idled, applicable interest and real estate taxes are expensed as incurred. Land acquisition and development costs are allocated to individual lots using an average lot cost determined based on the total expected land acquisition and development costs and the total expected home closings for the community. The specific identification method is used to accumulate home construction costs.

We capitalize interest cost into homebuilding inventories. Each layer of capitalized interest is amortized over a period that approximates the average life of communities under development. Interest expense is allocated over the period based on the timing of home closings.

Cost of revenues includes the construction cost, average lot cost, estimated warranty costs, and commissions and closing costs applicable to the home. The construction cost of the home includes amounts paid through the closing date of the home, plus an appropriate accrual for costs incurred but not yet paid, based on an analysis of budgeted construction costs. This accrual is reviewed for accuracy based on actual payments made after closing compared with the amount accrued, and adjustments are made if needed.paid. Total community land acquisition and development costs are based on an analysis of budgeted costs compared with actual costs incurred to date and estimates to complete. The development cycles for our communities range from under one year to in excess of ten years for certain master planned communities. Adjustments to estimated total land acquisition and development costs for the community affect the amounts costed for the community’s remaining lots.

We record valuation adjustments on land inventory when events and circumstances indicate that the related community may be impaired and when the cash flows estimated to be generated by the community are less than its carrying amount. Such indicators include gross margins or sales paces significantly below expectations, construction costs or land development costs significantly in excess of budgeted amounts, significant delays or changes in the planned development for the community, and other known qualitative factors. Communities that demonstrate potential impairment indicators are tested for impairment by comparing the expected undiscounted cash flows for the community to its carrying value. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, we estimate the fair value of the community. Impairment charges are recorded if the fair value of the community's inventory is less than its carrying value. We determine the fair value of a community's inventory using a combination of market comparable land

51


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


transactions, where available, and discounted cash flow models. These estimated cash flows are significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices, expected sales paces, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models are specific to each community. Our evaluations for impairments are based on our best estimates of the future cash flows for our communities. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing, the long life cycles of many communities, and potential changes in our strategy related to certain communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. See Note 43.

Land held for sale

We periodically elect to sell parcels of land to third parties in the event such assets no longer fit into our strategic operating plans or are zoned for commercial or other development. Land held for sale is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. In determining the value of land held for sale, we consider recent offers received, prices for land in recent comparable sales transactions, and other factors. We record net realizable value adjustments for land held for sale within Homebuilding land sale cost of revenues. See Note 3.

Land option agreements

In the ordinary course of business, weWe enter into land option agreements in order to procure land for the construction of homes in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we generally provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such contracts enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties or unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether and when to exercise our option, which reduces our financial risks associated with long-term land holdings. Option deposits and pre-acquisition costs (such as environmental testing, surveys, engineering, and entitlement costs) are capitalized if the costs are directly identifiable with the land under option, the costs would be capitalized if we owned the land, and acquisition of the property is probable. Such costs are reflected in other assets and are reclassified to inventory upon taking title to the land. We write off deposits and pre-acquisition costs when it becomes probable that we will not go forward with the project or recover the capitalized costs. Such decisions take into consideration changes in local market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns,purchases, the availability and best use of necessary incremental capital, and other factors. We record theseany such write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs within other expense, (income), net.  See Note 43.

If thean entity holding the land under option is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), our deposit represents a variable interest in that entity. IfNo VIEs required consolidation at either December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014 because we are determined to bethat we were not the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we are required to consolidate the VIE. Certain of our land option agreements are with entities considered VIEs. In evaluating whether we are required to consolidate a VIE, we take into consideration that the VIE is generally protected from the first dollar of loss under our land option agreement due to our deposit. Likewise, the VIE's gains are generally capped based on the purchase price within the land option agreement. However, we generally have little control or influence over the operations of these VIEs due to our lack of an equity interest in them. Additionally, creditors of the VIE have no recourse against us, and we do not provide financial or other support to these VIEs other than as stipulated in the land option agreements.beneficiary. Our maximum exposure to loss related to these VIEs is generally limited to our deposits and pre-acquisition costs under the applicable land option agreements. Historically, we have canceled

The following provides a considerable numbersummary of our interests in land option agreements which has resulted in write-offs of the related deposits and pre-acquisition costs but did not expose us to the overall risks or losses of the applicable VIEs. ($000’s omitted):No VIEs required consolidation at either December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
 Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
 Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
Land options with VIEs$77,641
 $1,064,506
 $56,039
 $891,506
Other land options84,478
 981,687
 71,241
 999,079
 $162,119
 $2,046,193
 $127,280
 $1,890,585

Separately, certain land option agreements represent financing arrangements even though we generally have no obligationStart-up costs

Costs and expenses associated with opening new communities are expensed to pay these future amounts. As a result, we recorded $31.1 millionselling, general, and $24.9 million at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, to land, not owned, under option agreements with a corresponding increase to accrued and other liabilities. Such amounts represent the remaining purchase price under the land option agreements, some of which are with VIEs, in the event we exercise the purchase rights under the agreements.administrative expenses as incurred.


5552


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The following provides a summary of our interests in land option agreements as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 ($000’s omitted):
 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
 Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
 Land, Not
Owned,
Under
Option
Agreements
 Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
 Land, Not
Owned,
Under
Option
Agreements
Consolidated VIEs$5,216
 $8,590
 $8,590
 $2,781
 $5,957
 $3,837
Unconsolidated VIEs24,078
 360,495
 
 21,180
 240,958
 
Other land option
       agreements
40,822
 554,307
 22,476
 33,086
 451,079
 21,068
 $70,116
 $923,392
 $31,066
  $57,047
 $697,994
 $24,905

Land held for sale

We periodically elect to sell parcels of land to third parties in the event such assets no longer fit into our strategic operating plans or are zoned for commercial or other development. Land held for sale is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. See Note 4.

Start-up costs

Costs and expenses associated with opening new communities in existing markets are expensed when incurred.

Allowance for warranties

Home purchasers are provided with a limited warranty against certain building defects.defects, including a one-year comprehensive limited warranty and coverage for certain other aspects of the home's construction and operating systems for periods of up to 10 years. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the product revenue is recognized.recognized for each home closing.

Self-insured risks

We maintain, and require the majority of our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance coverage, including coverage for certain construction defects. We also maintain builders' risk, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of the risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and available policy limits. However, we retain a significant portion of the overall risk for such claims. We reserve for these costs on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims, which include estimates of claims incurred but not yet reported. Adjustments to estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies or from itsour subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable. See Note 1312.

Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale

Substantially all of the loans originated by us and their related servicing rights are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time after origination.origination, generally within 30 days. In accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”), we use the fair value option forto record residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. Election of the fair value option for these loans allows a better offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. We do not designate any derivative instruments as hedges or apply the hedge accounting provisions of ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” See Note 1312 for discussion of the risks retained related to mortgage loan originations. 


56


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Expected gains and losses from the sale of residential mortgage loans and their related servicing rights are included in the measurement of written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through Financial Services revenues at the time of commitment.  Subsequent changes in the fair value of these loans are reflected in Financial Services revenues as they occur. At December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, residential mortgage loans available-for-sale had an aggregate fair value of $318.9$442.7 million and $258.1$339.5 million,, respectively, and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $305.3$429.6 million and $248.2$327.4 million,, respectively. The net gain (loss) resulting from changes in fair value of these loans totaled $(0.2)$(0.3) million and $(0.4)$1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. These changes in fair value were substantially offset by changes in fair value of the corresponding hedging instruments. Net gains from the sale of mortgages during 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 20102013 were $109.2$80.8 million,, $59.1 $67.2 million,, and $66.0$80.3 million,, respectively, and have been included in Financial Services revenues.

Mortgage servicing rights

We sell the servicing rights for the loans we originate through fixed price servicing sales contracts to reduce the risks and costs inherent in servicing loans. This strategy results in owning the servicing rights for only a short period of time. We recognize the fair value of our rights to service a mortgage loan as revenue at the time of entering into an interest rate lock commitment with a borrower. Due to the short period of time the servicing rights are held, we do not amortize the servicing asset. The servicing sales contracts provide for the reimbursement of payments made by the purchaser if loans prepay within specified periods of time, generally within 90 to 120 days after sale. We establish reserves for this liability at the time the sale is recorded. Such reserves were immaterial at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 and are included in accrued and other liabilities.

Loans held for investment

We originate interim financing mortgage loans for certain customers and also havemaintain a portfolio of loans that either have been repurchased from investors or were not saleable upon closing. We have the intent and ability to hold these loans for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. These loans are carried at cost and are

53


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


reviewed annually for impairment, or when recoverability becomes doubtful. Loans held for investment are included in other assets and totaled $1.3$7.6 million and $2.412.5 million (net of reserves of $1.4 million and $1.9 million) at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, respectively.

Interest income on mortgage loans

Interest income on mortgage loans is recorded in Financial Services revenues, accrued from the date a mortgage loan is originated until the loan is sold, and totaled $6.06.9 million, $5.07.2 million, and $5.87.5 million in 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013, respectively. Loans are placed on non-accrual status once they become greater than 90 days past due their contractual terms. Subsequent payments received are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan. Mortgage discounts are not amortized as interest income due to the short period the loans are held until sale to third party investors.

Mortgage servicing, origination, and commitment fees

Mortgage servicing fees represent fees earned for servicing loans for various investors. Servicing fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal balance, or a contracted set fee in the case of certain sub-servicing arrangements, and are credited to income when related mortgage payments are received or the sub-servicing fees are earned. Loan origination costs related to residential mortgage loans available-for-sale are recognized as incurred in Financial Services expenses while the associated mortgage origination fees are recognized in Financial Services revenues as earned, generally upon loan closing.

 Title services

Revenues associated with our title operations are recognized within Financial Services revenues as closing services are rendered and title insurance policies are issued, both of which generally occur as each home is closed.


57


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Derivative instruments and hedging activities

We are exposed to market risks from commitments to lend, movements in interest rates, and canceled or modified commitments to lend. A commitment to lend at a specific interest rate (an interest rate lock commitment) is a derivative financial instrument (interest rate is locked to the borrower). In order to reduce these risks,At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we use other derivative financial instruments, principally cash forward placement contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments, to economically hedge the interest rate lock commitment. We enter into these derivative financial instruments based upon our portfolio ofhad aggregate interest rate lock commitments and closed loans. We do not use any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

At December 31, 2012of $208.2 million and 2011, we had interest rate lock commitments in the total amount of $161.6 million and $97.6146.1 million, respectively, which were originated at interest rates prevailing at the date of commitment. Since we can terminate a loan commitment if the borrower does not comply with the terms of the contract, and some loan commitments may expire without being drawn upon, these commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate the creditworthiness of these transactions through our normal credit policies.

In order to reduce risks associated with our loan origination activities, we use other derivative financial instruments, principally cash forward placement contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments, to economically hedge the interest rate lock commitment. We enter into these derivative financial instruments based upon our portfolio of interest rate lock commitments and closed loans. We do not enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities are commitments to either purchase or sell a specified financial instrument at a specified future date for a specified price andthat may be settled in cash, by offsetting the position, or through the delivery of the financial instrument. Forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities are the predominant derivative financial instruments we use to minimize market risk during the period from the time we extend an interest rate lock to a loan applicant until the time the loan is sold to an investor. We also use whole loan investor commitments, which are obligations of the investor to buy loans from us at a specified price within a specified time period. At December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, we had unexpired forward contracts of $428.0$525.0 million and $311.5$371.0 million,, respectively, and whole loan investor commitments of $4.7$77.6 million and $1.6$63.5 million,, respectively. Changes in the fair value of interest rate lock commitments and other derivative financial instruments are recognized in Financial Services revenues, and the fair values are reflected in other assets or other liabilities, as applicable.

There are no credit-risk-related contingent features within our derivative agreements, and counterparty risk is considered minimal. Gains and losses on interest rate lock commitments are substantially offset by corresponding gains or losses on forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments. We are generally not exposed to variability in cash flows of derivative instruments for more than approximately 6075 days.

The fair values of derivative instruments and their locations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are summarized below ($000’s omitted):
 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
 Other Assets Other Liabilities Other Assets Other Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments$6,045
 $24
 $3,552
 $1
Forward contracts245
 891
 44
 3,514
Whole loan commitments30
 85
 52
 41
 $6,320
 $1,000
 $3,648
 $3,556

New accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement” (“ASU 2011-04”), which amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 to clarify existing guidance and minimize differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). ASU 2011-04 requires entities to provide information about valuation techniques and unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements and provide additional disclosures for classes of assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value. We adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012, which did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, “Statement of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which requires entities to present net income and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 was effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The standard did not impact our reported results of operations but did impact our financial statement presentation. We now present items of other

5854


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


comprehensive incomeThe fair values of derivative instruments and their location in the Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income rather than in the Statement of Shareholders' Equity.Balance Sheets are summarized below ($000’s omitted):
 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
 Other Assets Other Liabilities Other Assets Other Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments$5,854
 $280
 $4,313
 $65
Forward contracts1,178
 840
 79
 3,653
Whole loan commitments358
 345
 31
 619
 $7,390
 $1,465
 $4,423
 $4,337

New accounting pronouncements

In December 2011,May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASU 2014-09"). The standard is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date", which delayed the effective date by one year. As a result, the standard is effective for us for annual and Liabilities" ("interim periods beginning January 1, 2018 and allows for full retrospective or modified retrospective methods of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on our financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2011-11"2014-15”), which requires entitiesmanagement to disclose informationevaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about offsettingthe entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and provide related arrangements of financial instruments and derivative instruments. The guidancedisclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for our fiscal yearannual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 20132017 and is to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In July 2012,April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,”2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” ("ASU 2015-03"), which providesrequires debt issuance costs to be presented in the option to performbalance sheet as a qualitative, rather than quantitative, assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. Ifdirect deduction from the asset is considered impaired, an entity is required to performcarrying value of the quantitative assessment underassociated debt, consistent with the existing guidance.presentation of a debt discount. The guidance is effective for our fiscal yearus beginning January 1, 2013. The2016. We currently present deferred financing costs within Other assets. Accordingly, the adoption of thisthe new guidance will result in the reclassification of debt issuance costs as an offset to the related debt on the balance sheet, which is intendedwe do not expect to simplify the impairment testing, is not expectedbe material to have a material impact on our financial statements.

2. GoodwillCorporate office relocation
Goodwill was recorded in connection with various acquisitions but was written-off as of December 31, 2011. We evaluated the recoverability of goodwill by comparing the carrying value of our reporting units to their fair value. Fair value was determined using discounted cash flows supplemented by market-based assessments of fair value, and impairment was measured as the difference between the resulting implied fair value of goodwill and its recorded carrying value. The determination of fair value was significantly impacted by estimates related to current market valuations, current and future economic conditions in each of our geographical markets, and our strategic plans within each of our markets.
In May 2013, we announced our plan to relocate our corporate offices to Atlanta, Georgia, from the third quartersprevious location in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. The relocation of both 2011operations is occurring in phases over time and 2010, we performed event-driven assessmentsis expected to be substantially complete in 2016. We recorded employee severance, retention, relocation, and related expenses of the recoverability of goodwill.  These assessments were necessary primarily due to sustained declines$2.0 million, $7.6 million, and $15.0 million in our market capitalization. In performing the goodwill impairment analyses, we followed similar approaches using management's estimates of the future cash flows for each reporting unit, which were required to consider the decrease in our market capitalization. The results of these analyses determined that goodwill impairment charges of $240.5 million2015, 2014, and $654.9 million in the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, were required. In the second quarter of 2010, we2013, respectively. We also recorded a goodwilllease exit and asset impairment charge of $1.4expenses totaling $2.3 million, $8.7 million, and $0.4 million in conjunction with the completion of business combination accounting for the Centex merger2015, 2014, and disposed of $1.6 million of goodwill in connection with the sale of the retail title operations acquired with the Centex merger.
Activity in our goodwill balances by reporting segment consisted of the following ($000's omitted):
 Reporting Segment  
 Northeast Southeast Florida Texas North Southwest Financial Services Total Goodwill
December 31, 2009
 327,033
 5,465
 347,969
 160,095
 53,763
 1,593
 895,918
Additions494
 610
 79
 600
 468
 263
 
 2,514
Impairments(494) (267,149) (5,544) (256,474) (95,207) (31,430) 
 (656,298)
Disposals
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,593) (1,593)
December 31, 2010
 60,494
 
 92,095
 65,356
 22,596
 
 240,541
Impairments
 (60,494) 
 (92,095) (65,356) (22,596) 
 (240,541)
December 31, 2011$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Our accumulated goodwill2013, respectively. Severance, retention, relocation, and related expenses are recorded within selling, general, and administrative expense, while lease exit and asset impairment losses totaled $1.8 billion at December 31, 2012. This includes goodwill and impairments associated with the Centex merger as well as goodwill and impairments associated with previous acquisitions. The goodwill associated with such previous acquisitions was fully impaired as of December 31, 2009. Goodwill impairment chargesexpenses are reflectedincluded in other expense, (income), net. We expect the remaining expenses to total less than $10.0 million.



5955


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


3. Restructuring

We periodically take actions to reduce ongoing operating costs and improve operating efficiencies. As a result of these actions, we incurred total restructuring charges as summarized below ($000’s omitted):
 Total Restructuring Actions
 2012 2011 2010
Employee severance benefits$4,481
 $10,841
 $24,850
Lease exit costs5,702
 5,923
 27,356
Other2,057
 4,089
 3,929
 $12,240
 $20,853
 $56,135

Of the total restructuring costs reflected in the above table, $0.5 million in 2012, $1.2 million in 2011, and $5.4 million in 2010 are classified within Financial Services expenses. All other employee severance benefits are included within selling, general and administrative expense while lease exit and other costs are included in other expense (income), net. The remaining liability for employee severance benefits and exited leases totaled $1.0 million and $23.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012 and $2.6 million and $29.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011. Substantially all of the remaining liability for employee severance benefits will be paid within the next year, while cash expenditures related to the remaining liability for lease exit costs will be incurred over the remaining terms of the applicable office leases, which generally extend several years. The restructuring costs relate to various reportable segments and did not materially impact the comparability of any one segment.

4. Inventory and land held for sale

Major components of inventory at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 were ($000’s omitted):
2012 20112015 2014
Homes under construction$1,116,184
 $1,210,717
$1,408,260
 $1,084,137
Land under development2,435,378
 2,610,501
3,259,066
 2,545,049
Raw land662,484
 815,250
782,732
 762,914
$4,214,046
 $4,636,468
$5,450,058
 $4,392,100

We capitalize interest cost into inventory during the active development and construction of our communities. Each layer of capitalized interest is amortized over a period that approximates the average life of communities under development. Interest expense is recorded based on the cyclical timing of home closings. During 2012 and 2011,In all periods presented, we capitalized all Homebuilding interest costs into inventory because the level of our active inventory exceeded our debt levels. During 2010, we capitalized all Homebuilding interest costs into inventory except $1.5 million that was expensed directly to interest expense due to our debt levels exceeding our active inventory levels for a portion of the year.

InformationActivity related to interest capitalized into inventory is as follows ($000’s omitted):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Interest in inventory, beginning of period$355,068
 $323,379
 $239,365
$167,638
 $230,922
 $331,880
Interest capitalized201,103
 221,071
 264,932
120,001
 131,444
 154,107
Interest expensed (a)
(224,291) (189,382) (180,918)(138,141) (194,728) (255,065)
Interest in inventory, end of period$331,880
 $355,068
 $323,379
$149,498
 $167,638
 $230,922
Interest incurred (b)
$201,103
 $221,071
 $266,474

(a)
Interest expensed to Homebuilding cost of revenues for 2012, 2011, and 2010 included $6.5 million, $5.4 million, and $27.6 million, respectively, of capitalized interest related to inventory impairments.
(b)Homebuilding interest incurred includes interest on senior debt and certain other financing arrangements.
Land-related charges

We recorded the following land-related charges ($000's omitted):
 2015 2014 2013
Land impairments$7,347
 $3,911
 $2,944
Net realizable value adjustments ("NRV") - land held for sale(901) 1,158
 3,606
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs5,021
 6,099
 3,122
Total land-related charges$11,467
 $11,168
 $9,672

Land held for sale

Land held for sale at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2015 2014
Land held for sale, gross$86,913
 $108,725
Net realizable value reserves(5,421) (7,535)
Land held for sale, net$81,492
 $101,190


6056


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Land valuation adjustments and write-offs

Impairment of inventory

We record valuation adjustments on land inventory and related communities under development when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and when the cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their carrying amounts. Such indicators include gross margin or sales paces significantly below expectations, construction costs or land development costs significantly in excess of budgeted amounts, significant delays or changes in the planned development for the community, and other known qualitative factors. For communities that are not yet active, an additional consideration includes an evaluation of the probability, timing, and cost of obtaining necessary approvals from local municipalities and any potential concessions that may be necessary in order to obtain such approvals. We also consider potential changes to the product offerings in a community and any alternative strategies for the land, such as the sale of the land either in whole or in parcels. Communities that demonstrate potential impairment indicators are tested for impairment. We compare the expected undiscounted cash flows for these communities to their carrying value. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, we estimate the fair value of the community. Impairment charges are required to be recorded if the fair value of the community's inventory is less than its carrying value.

We determine the fair value of a community's inventory using a combination of market comparable land transactions, where available, and discounted cash flow models. These estimated cash flows are significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices, expected sales paces, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models are specific to each community tested for impairment. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing, and the long life cycles of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. Our determination of fair value also requires discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the inherent risks associated with each of the assets and related estimated cash flow streams. The discount rate used in determining each community's fair value depends on the stage of development of the community and other specific factors that increase or decrease the inherent risks associated with the community's cash flow streams. For example, communities that are entitled and near completion will generally be assigned a lower discount rate than communities that are not entitled and consist of multiple phases spanning several years of development and construction activity.

In 2012, we reviewed each of our land positions for potential impairment indicators and performed detailed impairment calculations for 35 communities. As discussed above, determining the fair value of a community's inventory involves a number of variables, many of which are interrelated. The table below summarizes certain quantitative unobservable inputs utilized in determining the fair value of impaired communities during 2012:
Unobservable inputRange
Average selling price ($000s)$139-$626
Sales pace per quarter (units)1-9
Discount rate12%-16%


61


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The table below provides, as of the date indicated, the number of communities for which we recognized impairment charges, the fair value of those communities at such date (net of impairment charges), and the amount of impairment charges recognized ($000’s omitted):
 2012 2011
Quarter Ended
Number of
Communities
Impaired
 
Fair Value of
Communities
Impaired, Net
of Impairment
Charges
 
Impairment
Charges
 
Number of
Communities
Impaired
 
Fair Value of
Communities
Impaired, Net
of Impairment
Charges
 
Impairment
Charges
March 314
 $7,468
 $4,514
 1
 $483
 $103
June 304
 16,311
 2,796
 6
 6,665
 3,300
September 304
 6,172
 2,263
 3
 6,416
 1,494
December 315
 11,243
 3,864
 25
 23,766
 11,043
     $13,437
     $15,940

We recorded these valuation adjustments within Homebuilding home sale cost of revenues.

Our evaluations for impairments were based on our best estimates of the future cash flows for our communities. However, if conditions in the homebuilding industry or our local markets worsen in the future or if our strategy related to certain communities changes, we may be required to evaluate our assets for future impairments or write-downs, which could result in future charges that might be significant.

Net realizable value adjustments – land held for sale

Land held for sale is valued at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. In determining the fair value of land held for sale, we consider recent offers received, prices for land in recent comparable sales transactions, and other factors. During 2012, 2011, and 2010, we recognized net realizable value adjustments related to land held for sale of $1.5 million, $9.8 million, and $39.1 million, respectively. We record these net realizable value adjustments within Homebuilding land sale cost of revenues. Land held for sale at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2012 2011
Land held for sale, gross$135,201
 $190,099
Net realizable value reserves(44,097) (54,792)
Land held for sale, net$91,104
 $135,307

Write-off of deposits and pre-acquisition costs

We wrote off (net of recoveries) deposits and pre-acquisition costs in the amount of $2.3 million, $10.0 million, and $5.6 million, during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. We record these write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs within other expense (income), net.


62


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


5.4. Segment information

Our Homebuilding operations are engaged in the acquisition and development of land primarily for residential purposes within the U.S. and the construction of housing on such land. Home sale revenues for detached and attached homes were $5.0 billion and $841.5 million in 2015, $3.64.8 billion and $925.4885.8 million in 20122014, and $3.14.5 billion and $841.3939.0 million in 2011, and $3.5 billion and $936.6 million in 20102013, respectively. For reporting purposes, our Homebuilding operations are aggregated into six reportable segments:segments. For 2015, we realigned our organizational structure and reportable segment presentation. Accordingly, the segment information provided in this note has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation for all periods presented.
Northeast:  Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Virginia
Southeast: Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Florida: Florida
Midwest:Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio
Texas: Texas
North:Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Northern California, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
Southwest:West: Arizona, Colorado,California, Nevada, New Mexico, Southern California
Washington

We also have a reportable segment for our Financial Services operations, which consist principally of mortgage banking and title operations. The Financial Services segment operates generally in the same markets as the Homebuilding segments.

Evaluation of segment performance is generally based on income before income taxes. Each reportable segment generally follows the same accounting policies described in Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements..
 

6357


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Operating Data by Segment ($000’s omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
Operating Data by Segment ($000’s omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Revenues:          
Northeast$755,148
 $717,839
 $760,403
$682,112
 $710,859
 $819,709
Southeast691,113
 675,904
 752,702
1,058,089
 949,635
 842,921
Florida628,997
 571,102
 547,647
1,019,733
 917,956
 802,665
Midwest1,020,691
 872,241
 791,537
Texas682,929
 631,419
 643,365
845,772
 859,165
 835,473
North1,022,633
 740,372
 863,512
Southwest878,290
 696,960
 879,998
West1,214,814
 1,386,869
 1,446,339
4,659,110
 4,033,596
 4,447,627
5,841,211
 5,696,725
 5,538,644
Financial Services160,888
 103,094
 121,663
140,753
 125,638
 140,951
Consolidated revenues$4,819,998
 $4,136,690
 $4,569,290
$5,981,964
 $5,822,363
 $5,679,595
          
Income (loss) before income taxes:     
Income before income taxes:     
Northeast(a)$73,345
 $29,320
 $34,619
$82,616
 $103,865
 $110,246
Southeast64,678
 45,060
 23,454
172,330
 156,513
 121,055
Florida73,472
 44,946
 (51,995)196,525
 190,441
 139,673
Midwest91,745
 78,863
 84,551
Texas60,979
 33,329
 16,026
121,329
 133,005
 111,431
North84,597
 (12,376) 571
Southwest79,887
 36,647
 (64,140)
West169,394
 254,724
 258,960
Other homebuilding (a)(b)
(278,967) (452,756) (1,198,690)(76,622) (282,234) (346,803)
157,991
 (275,830) (1,240,155)757,317
 635,177
 479,113
Financial Services (b)(c)
25,563
 (34,470) 5,609
58,706
 54,581
 48,709
Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes$183,554
 $(310,300) $(1,234,546)
Consolidated income before income taxes$816,023
 $689,758
 $527,822

(a)Other homebuilding
Northeast includes a charge of $20.0 million in 2015 resulting from the amortization of intangible assets, goodwill impairment, amortization of capitalized interest, loss on debt retirements and other costs not allocated to the operating segments.Applecross matter (see Note 12).
(b)
Financial Services income (loss) before income taxesOther homebuilding includes the amortization of intangible assets, amortization of capitalized interest, expenseand other items not allocated to the operating segments, in addition to: losses on debt retirements of $8.6 million and $26.9 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively (see Note 6$0.5); adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to a reversal of $62.2 million in 2015 and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 12); costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters totaling $4.4 million, $0.016.3 million, and $1.615.4 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively (see Note 2); and charges of $41.2 million in 2013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community (see Note 12).
(c)
Financial Services included reductions in loan origination liabilities totaling $11.8 million and $18.6 million for 2012, 2011,in 2015 and 2010, respectively, and interest income of $6.0 million, $5.0 million, and $5.8 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010,2014, respectively.


 












58



PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
Land-related charges*:     
Northeast$3,301
 $2,824
 $557
Southeast3,022
 1,826
 998
Florida4,555
 487
 1,076
Midwest2,319
 2,347
 1,883
Texas295
 321
 191
West(2,615) 1,696
 2,023
Other homebuilding590
 1,667
 2,944
 $11,467
 $11,168
 $9,672

*
Land-related charges include land impairments, net realizable value adjustments for land held for sale, and write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for land option contracts we elected not to pursue. Other homebuilding consists primarily of write-offs of capitalized interest related to such land-related charges. See Note 1 for additional discussion of these charges.
 
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
Depreciation and amortization:     
Northeast$1,682
 $1,852
 $1,987
Southeast3,492
 2,666
 1,647
Florida3,536
 2,150
 1,334
Midwest5,019
 3,153
 1,644
Texas2,928
 1,698
 1,784
West5,995
 5,263
 3,590
Other homebuilding (a)
20,254
 19,548
 16,248
 42,906
 36,330
 28,234
Financial Services3,316
 3,534
 3,353
 $46,222
 $39,864
 $31,587
(a)Other homebuilding includes amortization of intangible assets.
 
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities:     
Northeast$2
 $(4,733) $(58)
Southeast
 
 
Florida2
 (7) (4)
Midwest(337) (481) 151
Texas
 
 
West(5,107) (2,422) (1,437)
Other homebuilding(1,915) (583) 355
 (7,355) (8,226) (993)
Financial Services
 (182) (137)
 $(7,355) $(8,408) $(1,130)



6459


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 Operating Data by Segment
 ($000's omitted)
 December 31, 2015
 Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$163,173
 $292,631
 $121,522
 $577,326
 $688,610
Southeast196,456
 367,577
 139,246
 703,279
 765,933
Florida227,910
 574,092
 97,185
 899,187
 1,013,543
Midwest197,738
 414,386
 68,918
 681,042
 734,834
Texas191,424
 317,702
 107,737
 616,863
 691,342
West413,208
 1,094,112
 222,920
 1,730,240
 1,924,958
Other homebuilding (a)
18,351
 198,566
 25,204
 242,121
 2,638,951
 1,408,260
 3,259,066
 782,732
 5,450,058
 8,458,171
Financial Services
 
 
 
 508,989
 $1,408,260
 $3,259,066
 $782,732
 $5,450,058
 $8,967,160
          
 December 31, 2014
 Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$184,974
 $266,229
 $106,077
 $557,280
 $659,224
Southeast147,506
 304,762
 117,981
 570,249
 605,067
Florida150,743
 350,016
 112,225
 612,984
 717,531
Midwest176,966
 326,549
 70,266
 573,781
 624,815
Texas134,873
 250,102
 91,765
 476,740
 528,392
West270,060
 850,629
 230,199
 1,350,888
 1,485,685
Other homebuilding (a)
19,015
 196,762
 34,401
 250,178
 3,527,731
 1,084,137
 2,545,049
 762,914
 4,392,100
 8,148,445
Financial Services
 
 
 
 420,965
 $1,084,137
 $2,545,049
 $762,914
 $4,392,100
 $8,569,410
          
 December 31, 2013
 Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$212,611
 $325,241
 $106,681
 $644,533
 $731,259
Southeast139,484
 274,981
 146,617
 561,082
 599,271
Florida140,366
 295,631
 104,766
 540,763
 618,449
Midwest109,251
 184,172
 23,092
 316,515
 346,851
Texas130,398
 223,979
 57,480
 411,857
 466,198
West277,636
 678,231
 257,512
 1,213,379
 1,309,850
Other homebuilding (a)
32,401
 207,152
 50,879
 290,432
 4,334,591
 1,042,147
 2,189,387
 747,027
 3,978,561
 8,406,469
Financial Services
 
 
 
 327,674
 $1,042,147
 $2,189,387
 $747,027
 $3,978,561
 $8,734,143
(a)Other homebuilding primarily includes cash and equivalents, capitalized interest, intangibles, deferred tax assets, and other corporate items that are not allocated to the operating segments.

60


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 
Land-Related Charges by Segment
($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Land and community valuation adjustments:     
Northeast$798
 $534
 $4,907
Southeast389
 902
 11,122
Florida
 
 56,445
Texas
 260
 4,589
North3,972
 8,802
 27,732
Southwest1,810
 
 36,797
Other homebuilding (a)
6,468
 5,442
 28,130
 $13,437
 $15,940
 $169,722
Net realizable value adjustments (NRV) - land held for sale:     
Northeast$
 $720
 $
Southeast350
 446
 
Florida49
 3,692
 366
Texas423
 153
 1,484
North311
 3,552
 197
Southwest347
 1,281
 37,081
 $1,480
 $9,844
 $39,128
Write-off of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (b):
     
Northeast$996
 $3,704
 $(672)
Southeast624
 1,081
 3,019
Florida165
 307
 22
Texas133
 415
 741
North263
 2,513
 147
Southwest97
 1,982
 2,337
 $2,278
 $10,002
 $5,594
Impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures:     
Southwest
 
 1,908
 $
 $
 $1,908
Total land-related charges$17,195
 $35,786
 $216,352

(a)Primarily write-offs of capitalized interest related to land and community valuation adjustments.
(b)Includes settlements related to costs previously in dispute and considered non-recoverable.













65


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Depreciation and amortization:     
Northeast$1,790
 $1,820
 $1,954
Southeast1,028
 1,414
 2,904
Florida1,640
 2,045
 2,031
Texas1,619
 2,002
 2,027
North1,709
 1,614
 1,883
Southwest3,143
 3,076
 5,075
Other homebuilding (a)
16,168
 17,329
 25,817
 27,097
 29,300
 41,691
Financial Services2,930
 2,798
 3,969
 $30,027
 $32,098
 $45,660

(a)Other homebuilding includes amortization of intangible assets.

 
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities (a):
     
Northeast$(4) $15
 $(209)
Southeast
 
 
Florida
 
 (1,326)
Texas
 
 
North(1,497) (121) (1,580)
Southwest(1,137) (2,561) 197
Other homebuilding(1,235) (527) 75
 (3,873) (3,194) (2,843)
Financial Services(186) (102) (68)
 $(4,059) $(3,296) $(2,911)

(a)Includes impairments related to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.





















66


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 Operating Data by Segment
 ($000's omitted)
 December 31, 2012
 Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$198,549
 $445,436
 $109,136
 $753,121
 $866,024
Southeast147,227
 286,210
 120,193
 553,630
 590,650
Florida130,276
 310,625
 100,633
 541,534
 620,220
Texas145,594
 256,704
 54,556
 456,854
 523,843
North219,172
 369,144
 46,414
 634,730
 680,447
Southwest226,204
 496,488
 167,295
 889,987
 963,540
Other homebuilding (a)
49,162
 270,771
 64,257
 384,190
 2,140,739
 1,116,184
 2,435,378
 662,484
 4,214,046
 6,385,463
Financial Services
 
 
 
 348,946
 $1,116,184
 $2,435,378
 $662,484
 $4,214,046
 $6,734,409
          
 December 31, 2011
 Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$237,722
 $457,010
 $119,549
 $814,281
 $957,844
Southeast166,302
 315,208
 123,209
 604,719
 626,506
Florida137,900
 321,841
 110,040
 569,781
 637,418
Texas136,325
 294,814
 77,125
 508,264
 568,974
North268,011
 360,202
 91,260
 719,473
 803,174
Southwest216,067
 577,656
 216,554
 1,010,277
 1,099,058
Other homebuilding (a)
48,390
 283,770
 77,513
 409,673
 1,904,847
 1,210,717
 2,610,501
 815,250
 4,636,468
 6,597,821
Financial Services
 
 
 
 287,799
 $1,210,717
 $2,610,501
 $815,250
 $4,636,468
 $6,885,620
          
 December 31, 2010
 Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$236,298
 $460,789
 $129,733
 $826,820
 $993,918
Southeast219,339
 301,989
 132,920
 654,248
 688,524
Florida161,461
 256,238
 153,814
 571,513
 701,910
Texas152,274
 299,146
 86,137
 537,557
 592,827
North271,501
 333,958
 112,629
 718,088
 780,367
Southwest246,926
 629,302
 216,478
 1,092,706
 1,186,618
Other homebuilding (a)
43,819
 260,407
 76,655
 380,881
 2,532,223
 1,331,618
 2,541,829
 908,366
 4,781,813
 7,476,387
Financial Services
 
 
 
 222,989
 $1,331,618
 $2,541,829
 $908,366
 $4,781,813
 $7,699,376
(a)Other homebuilding primarily includes capitalized interest, cash and equivalents, goodwill, income taxes receivable, intangibles, and other corporate items that are not allocated to the operating segments.

67


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


6.5. Investments in unconsolidated entities

We participate in a number of joint ventures with independent third parties. Many of theseThese joint ventures generally purchase, develop, and/orand sell land, and homesincluding selling land to us for use in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.our homebuilding operations. A summary of our joint ventures is presented below ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112015 2014
Investments in joint ventures with debt non-recourse to PulteGroup11,155
 11,453
$23,236
 $26,488
Investments in other active joint ventures34,474
 24,535
18,031
 13,880
Total investments in unconsolidated entities$45,629
 $35,988
$41,267
 $40,368
      
Total joint venture debt$6,915
 $11,107
$16,369
 $25,849
      
PulteGroup proportionate share of joint venture debt:      
Joint venture debt with limited recourse guaranties$769
 $1,202
$226
 $283
Joint venture debt non-recourse to PulteGroup826
 2,009
6,744
 11,341
PulteGroup's total proportionate share of joint venture debt$1,595
 $3,211
$6,970
 $11,624

In 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013, we recognized (income) expenseincome from unconsolidated joint ventures of $(4.1)$7.4 million,, $(3.3) $8.4 million,, and $(2.9)$1.1 million,, respectively. The income recognized during 2010 includes impairments totaling $1.9 respectively (of which $0.2 million and $0.1 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to Financial Services). During 2012, 2011,We received distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures of $6.0 million, $13.1 million, and 2010, we$3.1 million, in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, and made no significant capital contributions of $16.5 million, $4.6 million, and $22.9 million, respectively, and received capital and earnings distributions of $10.5 million, $11.6 million, and $9.7 million, respectively.during such periods.

The timing of cash obligations under theflows related to a joint venture and any related financing agreements varies by agreement. If additional capital contributions are required and approved by the joint venture, we would need to contribute our pro rata portion of those capital needs in order to not dilute our ownership in the joint ventures. While future capital contributions may be required, we believe the total amount of such contributions will be limited. Our maximum financial loss exposure related to joint ventures is unlikely to exceed the combined investment and limited recourse guaranty totals.


68


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


7.6. Debt

Our senior notes are summarized as follows ($000’s omitted):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112015 2014
5.45% unsecured senior notes due August 2012 (a)

 96,795
6.25% unsecured senior notes due February 2013 (a)

 62,677
5.125% unsecured senior notes due October 2013 (a)

 117,197
5.25% unsecured senior notes due January 2014 (a)
187,970
 255,882
5.70% unsecured senior notes due May 2014 (a)
208,274
 311,900
5.20% unsecured senior notes due February 2015 (a)
95,615
 207,906
5.25% unsecured senior notes due June 2015 (a)
264,058
 270,551
$
 $236,452
6.50% unsecured senior notes due May 2016 (a)
457,154
 469,147
464,436
 462,009
7.625% unsecured senior notes due October 2017 (b)
149,481
 149,373
122,841
 122,752
7.875% unsecured senior notes due June 2032 (a)
299,152
 299,108
299,283
 299,239
6.375% unsecured senior notes due May 2033 (a)
398,492
 398,418
398,714
 398,640
6.00% unsecured senior notes due February 2035 (a)
299,417
 299,390
299,495
 299,469
7.375% unsecured senior notes due June 2046 (a)
150,000
 150,000
Total senior notes – carrying value (c)
$2,509,613
 $3,088,344
$1,584,769
 $1,818,561
Estimated fair value$2,663,451
 $2,765,151
$1,643,651
 $1,952,774

(a)Redeemable prior to maturity; guaranteed on a senior basis by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries.
(b)Not redeemable prior to maturity; guaranteed on a senior basis by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries.
(c)The recorded carrying value reflects the impact of various discounts and premiums that are amortized to interest cost over the respective terms of the senior notes.


Refer to Note 14 for supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company.
61


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The indentures governing the senior notes impose certain restrictions on the incurrence of additional debt along with other limitations. At December 31, 20122015, we were in compliance with all of the covenants and requirements under the senior notes.

Total Our senior note principal maturities of $2.5 billion during the five years after 2012are as follows:2013 - $0.0 million; 2014 - $398.9 million; 2015 - $369.2 million; 2016 - $465.2 million; 2017 - $150.0123.0 million; 2018 through 2020 - $0.0 million; and thereafter - $1.21.0 billion. Refer to Note 13 for supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company.

Debt retirement

During the last three years, we significantly reduced ourWe retired outstanding senior notes through a variety of transactions, including scheduled maturities, open market repurchases, early redemptions as provided within indenture agreements,totaling $238.0 million, $245.7 million, and tender offers. As a result of these transactions, we reduced our outstanding senior notes by $592.4$461.4 million, $323.9 million, during 2015, 2014, and $898.5 million during 2012, 2011,2013, respectively. The 2014 and 2010, respectively,2013 retirements occurred prior to the stated maturity dates and recordedresulted in losses totaling $32.1$8.6 million, $5.6 and $26.9 million, in 2014 and $38.9 million in 2012, 2011 and 20102013, respectively. Losses on thesedebt repurchase transactions include the write-off of unamortized discounts, premiums, and transaction fees related to the repurchased debt and are reflected in other expense (income), net.

Revolving credit facility

In July 2014, we entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) maturing in July 2017.  The Revolving Credit Facility provides for maximum borrowings of $500.0 million and contains an uncommitted accordion feature that could increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.0 billion, subject to certain conditions and availability of additional bank commitments.  The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for the issuance of letters of credit that reduce available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility and may total no more than the greater of: (i) 50% of the size of the facility or (ii) $300.0 million in the aggregate. The interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility may be based on either the London Interbank Offered Rate or Base Rate plus an applicable margin, as defined. At December 31, 2015, we had no borrowings outstanding and $191.3 million of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum Tangible Net Worth, a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, and a maximum Debt-to-Capitalization Ratio (as each term is defined in the Revolving Credit Facility). As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants. Outstanding balances under the Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our available and unused borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit, amounted to $308.7 million and $291.6 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Term loan
On September 30, 2015, we entered into a senior unsecured $500.0 million term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with an initial maturity date of January 3, 2017, which can be extended at our option up to 12 months. The interest rate on the Term Loan may be based on either LIBOR or a base rate plus an applicable margin, as defined, and was 1.5% at December 31, 2015. Borrowings are interest only with the principal being due at the maturity date and are guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Term Loan contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for loans of this type, including the same financial covenants as under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants.

Limited recourse notes payable

Certain of our local homebuilding operations maintain limited recourse collateralized notes payable with third parties that totaled $35.3 million and $22.3 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These notes have maturities ranging up to six years, are collateralized by the applicable land positions to which they relate, have no recourse to any other assets, and are classified within accrued and other liabilities. The stated interest rates on these notes range up to 5.00%.


6962


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 Letter of credit facilities

We maintain separate cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements with a number of financial institutions. Letters of credit totaling $54.5 million and $83.2 million were outstanding under these agreements at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Under these agreements, we are required to maintain deposits with the respective financial institutions in amounts approximating the letters of credit outstanding. Such deposits are included in restricted cash.

We also maintain an unsecured letter of credit facility with a bank that expires in September 2014. This facility originally permitted the issuance of up to $200.0 million of letters of credit for general corporate purposes in support of any wholly-owned subsidiary. We voluntarily reduced the capacity of this facility to $150.0 million effective July 2, 2012. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, $124.6 million and $152.7 million, respectively, of letters of credit were outstanding under this facility.

Financial ServicesPulte Mortgage

Pulte Mortgage provides mortgage financing for the majority of our home closings utilizing its own funds and funds made available pursuant to credit agreements with third party lenders or through intercompany borrowings. Pulte Mortgage uses these resources to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold to third party investors, generally within 30 days.

In September 2012, Pulte Mortgage entered intomaintains a Master Repurchase Agreementmaster repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) with third party lenders. In September 2015, Pulte Mortgage entered into an amendment to the Repurchase Agreement that extended the effective date to September 2016. The Repurchase Agreement provideswas subsequently amended in December 2015 to increase the borrowing capacity to $310.0 million. The capacity decreased to $175.0 million on January 19, 2016, and increases to $200.0 million on July 29, 2016. The purpose for borrowings upthe changes in capacity during the term of the agreement is to $150.0 million, subject to certain sublimits, and expires in September 2013.lower associated fees during seasonally lower volume periods of mortgage origination activity. Borrowings under the Repurchase Agreement are secured by residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. The Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Pulte Mortgage, including quantitative thresholds related to net worth, net income, and liquidity. AtPulte Mortgage had $267.9 million and $140.2 million outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement at December 31, 20122015, Pulte Mortgage hadand $138.8 million2014 outstanding, respectively, and was in compliance with all of theits covenants and requirements under the Repurchase Agreement. During 2010 and 2011, Pulte Mortgage funded its operations using internal Company resources after allowing the majorityas of its third party credit arrangements to expire during 2010.such dates.

The following is aggregate borrowing information for our mortgage operations as of each year-end ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31,December 31,  
2012 2011 20102015 2014
Available credit lines$150,000
 $2,500
 $2,500
$310,000
 $150,000
Unused credit lines$11,205
 $2,500
 $2,500
$42,123
 $9,759
Weighted-average interest rate3.00% 4.50% 4.50%2.65% 2.70%
8.
7. Shareholders’ equity

Pursuant to $100.0We reinstated our quarterly cash dividend in July 2013 and subsequently raised the quarterly dividend in both 2014 and 2015. Our declared quarterly cash dividends totaled $117.9 million, stock $86.4 million, and $57.5 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Under the share repurchase programsprogram authorized by theour Board of Directors, inwe repurchased October 2002 and October 200521.2 million, 12.9 million, and a $200.0$7.2 million stock repurchase authorization shares in February 2006 (for a total stock repurchase authorization of $400.0 million), we have repurchased a total of 9,688,900 shares2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, for a total of $297.7433.7 million, though there were no repurchases under these programs during 2012, 2011, or 2010.$245.8 million, and $118.1 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2012,2015, we had remaining authorization to purchase $102.3repurchase $604.8 million of common stock.shares.

Under our stock-based compensation plans, we accept shares as payment under certain conditions related to stock option exercises and vesting of restricted stock, generally related to the payment of minimum tax obligations. During 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013, we repurchased $1.0employees surrendered shares valued at $9.0 million,, $2.8 $7.2 million,, and $4.0$9.6 million,, respectively, of shares from employees under these plans. Such repurchasesshare transactions are excluded from the $400.0 million stockabove noted share repurchase authorization.


7063


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


9.8. Stock compensation plans

We maintain a stock award plan for both employees and for non-employee directors. Information related to the active plan as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:
Plan NameShares
Authorized
 
Shares Available
for Grant
PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan22,000,000
 6,725,123

The plan provides for the grant of a variety of equity awards, including options (generally non-qualified options), restricted stock,shares, performance shares, and restricted stockshare units ("RSUs") to key employees (as determined by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors) for periods not exceedingto exceed ten years. Non-employee directors are entitled to an annual distribution of stock options, common shares, or RSUs. All options granted to non-employee directors vest immediately and are exercisable for ten years.years from the grant date. Options granted to employees generally vest incrementally over four years and are generally exercisable for ten years from the vest date. Restricted shares and RSUs generally cliff vest after three years. Restricted stock generally cliff vests after three years.share holders have voting rights during the vesting period and both restricted share and RSU holders receive cash dividends during the vesting period. Performance shares vest upon attainment of the stated performance targets and minimum service requirements and are converted into shares of common stockshares upon distribution. RSUs represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of common stockshares and are converted into shares of common stockshares upon distribution.

Non-employee directors are entitled to an annual distribution As of stock options, common stock, or restricted stock units. All options and RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest immediately and are exercisable onDecember 31, 2015, there were 25.1 million shares that remained available for grant under the grant date for ten years.plan.

Our stock compensation expense for the three years ended December 31, 20122015, is presented below ($000's omitted):
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Stock options$2,617
 $5,228
 $15,030
$37
 $121
 $1,056
Restricted stock8,919
 11,231
 17,051
Performance shares and RSUs1,158
 
 
Restricted shares (including RSUs and performance shares)16,852
 13,690
 13,418
Long-term incentive plans10,203
 511
 
7,863
 15,481
 16,006
$22,897
 16,970
 32,081
$24,752
 $29,292
 $30,480

Stock options

A summary of stock option activity for the three years ended December 31, 20122015, is presented below (000’s omitted except per share data):
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year21,641
 $21
 24,004
 $21
 26,193
 $21
9,370
 $23
 12,887
 $23
 17,148
 $22
Granted
 $
 441
 $8
 1,128
 $11

 
 
 
 
 
Exercised(2,877) $11
 
 $
 (902) $10
(904) 12
 (1,422) 11
 (1,432) 14
Forfeited(1,616) $27
 (2,804) $15
 (2,415) $21
(2,426) 37
 (2,095) 29
 (2,829) 25
Outstanding, end of year17,148
 $22
 21,641
 $21
 24,004
 $21
6,040
 $19
 9,370
 $23
 12,887
 $23
Options exercisable at year end15,719
 $23
 18,845
 $23
 19,400
 $23
6,040
 $19
 9,265
 $23
 12,402
 $23
Weighted-average per share fair value of
options granted during the year
$
   $4.46
   $6.43
  $
   $
   $
  


7164


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The following table summarizes information about the weighted-average remaining contractual lives of stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 20122015: 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 
Number
Outstanding
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contract Life
(in years)
 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 
Number
Exercisable
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average Per
Share
Exercise Price
$0.01 to $11.002,504
 5.5 $10
 2,063
 $11
$11.01 to $18.004,989
 6.4 $12
 4,001
 $12
$18.01 to $25.003,271
 1.1 $22
 3,271
 $22
$25.01 to $35.003,894
 3.0 $31
 3,894
 $31
$35.01 to $60.002,490
 2.5 $42
 2,490
 $42
 17,148
 3.9 $22
 15,719
 $23

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using primarily the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
Weighted-Average Assumptions
Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Expected life of options in yearsN/A 6.2
 6.0
Expected stock price volatilityN/A 58% 58%
Expected dividend yieldN/A 0.0% 0.0%
Risk-free interest rateN/A 2.7% 2.7%

We estimate the expected life of stock options using employees’ historical exercise behavior and the contractual terms of the instruments. Volatility is estimated using historical volatility with consideration for implied volatility.
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 
Number
Outstanding
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contract Life
(in years)
 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 
Number
Exercisable
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average Per
Share
Exercise Price
$0.01 to $10.00326
 4.8 $8
 326
 $8
$10.01 to $20.003,697
 3.5 12
 3,697
 12
$20.01 to $30.00152
 1.0 28
 152
 28
$30.01 to $40.001,865
 1.0 34
 1,865
 34
 6,040
 2.7 $19
 6,040
 $19

TotalWe did not issue any stock options during 2015, 2014, or 2013. As a result, there is no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards not yet recognized was $1.4 million at December 31, 20122015. These costs will be expensed over a weighted-average vesting period of approximately one year. The stock option participant agreements provide continued vesting for certain eligible employees who have achieved a predetermined level of service based on their combined age and years of service. We record the related compensation cost for these awards over the period through the date the employee first achieves the minimum level of service that would no longer require them to provide services to earn the award, which is reflected in the weighted-average vesting period.

The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options that were exercised during 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013 was $8.69.4 million, $0.014.1 million, and $1.810.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 20122015, options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $50.425.3 million, of which $39.625.3 million related to options exercisable.


72


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Restricted stockshares (including RSUs and performance shares)

A summary of restricted stockshare activity, including RSUs and performance shares, for the three years ended December 31, 20122015, is presented below (000’s omitted, except per share data):
 
 2012 2011 2010
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
Non-vested at beginning of
       year
2,322
 $10
 2,775
 $12
 3,539
 $16
Granted1,154
 $9
 1,032
 $8
 1,552
 $11
Vested(333) $11
 (1,242) $13
 (1,541) $21
Forfeited(137) $10
 (243) $11
 (775) $12
Non-vested at end of year3,006
 $9
 2,322
 $10
 2,775
 $12
 2015 2014 2013
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding, beginning of
       year
2,890
 $15
 3,211
 $11
 3,822
 $9
Granted932
 $22
 974
 $19
 806
 $21
Distributed(1,090) $10
 (1,019) $10
 (1,391) $11
Forfeited(156) $19
 (276) $15
 (26) $15
Outstanding, end of year2,576
 $18
 2,890
 $15
 3,211
 $11
Vested, end of year89
 $14
 75
 $13
 60
 $12

During 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013, the total fair value of shares vested during the year was $3.7$10.2 million,, $15.9 $8.1 million,, and $32.2$12.7 million,, respectively. Unamortized compensation cost related to restricted stockshare awards was $8.7$16.0 million at December 31, 2012.2015. These costs will be expensed over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years.

Performance shares and RSUs

A summary of performance share activity for the three years ended December 31, 2012 is presented below (000’s omitted, except per share data):
 2012 2011 2010
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding, beginning of
       year
720
 $7
 140
 $12
 123
 $12
Granted308
 $13
 772
 $7
 133
 $12
Forfeited
 $
 
 $
 
 $
Distributed(211) $10
 (192) $9
 (116) $12
Outstanding, end of year817
 $8
 720
 $7
 140
 $12
Vested, end of year51
 $10
 120
 $11
 140
 $12

During 2012 and 2011, we granted performance shares to certain individuals. We recognized expense in 2012 when it became probable that certain of the stated performance targets would be achieved. The fair value of each performance share was calculated using the stock price on the grant date. Unamortized compensation cost related to performance shares considered probable was $1.6 million at December 31, 2012 and will be expensed over a weighted-average period of approximately one year. Additionally, there were 51,45388,727 RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2015, that had vested but had not yet been paid out because the payout date had been deferred by the holder.

Long-term incentive plans

In lieu of restricted stock grants, weWe maintain a long-term incentive plan for certain of our field employees that provides awards based on the achievement of stated performance targets over a three-year period.  Awards are earned each year in the form of share units that are paid out in cash at the end of the performance period based upon the number of share units earned times the Company's stockshare price at the end of the performance period.  Accordingly, the liability associated with the awards is adjusted each reporting period based on movements in the Company's stockshare price and totaled $5.9$2.7 million and $0.5$9.5 million at December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

7365


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)



During 2012, we implementedWe also maintain a long-term performance award plan for senior management that provides awards based on the achievement of stated performance targets over a three-yearthree-year period.  Awards are earned based on our cumulative performance over the performance period and are stated in dollars but settled in common shares based on the Company's stock price at the end of the performance period.  If the Company's stockshare price falls below a floor of $5.00$5.00 per share at the end of the performance period or the Company doeswe do not have a sufficient number of shares available under itsour stock incentive plans at the time of settlement, then a portion of each award will be paid in cash.  We recognize expense for these awards based on the probability of achievement of the stated performance targets. The liability for these awards totaled $4.8$20.5 million and $26.2 million at December 31, 20122015. and

2014, respectively.
10.
9. Income taxes

Components of current and deferred income tax expense (benefit) are as follows ($000’s omitted):
 
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Current provision (benefit)     
Current expense (benefit)     
Federal$(8,523) $(71,796) $(114,617)$8,760
 $5,619
 $5,725
State and other(14,068) (28,116) (23,200)1,474
 (13,968) (1,596)
$(22,591) $(99,912) $(137,817)$10,234
 $(8,349) $4,129
Deferred provision (benefit)     
Deferred expense (benefit)     
Federal$
 $
 $
$277,895
 $232,969
 $(1,833,580)
State and other
 
 
33,804
 (9,200) (262,843)
$
 $
 $
$311,699
 $223,769
 $(2,096,423)
Income tax expense (benefit)$(22,591) $(99,912) $(137,817)$321,933
 $215,420
 $(2,092,294)

The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate:
 
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Income taxes at federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %35.0% 35.0 % 35.0 %
Effect of state and local income taxes, net of federal tax3.0
 3.0
 3.0
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax2.8
 3.0
 4.0
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance(37.7) (7.0) (12.4)0.4
 (6.6) (438.0)
Tax contingencies(10.6) 28.4
 5.0
0.1
 (1.4) 0.3
Goodwill impairment
 (28.7) (19.7)
Other(2.0) 1.5
 0.3
1.2
 1.2
 2.3
Effective rate(12.3)% 32.2 % 11.2 %39.5% 31.2 % (396.4)%

Our effective tax rate was 39.5%, 31.2% and (396.4)% for 2015, 2014, and 2013 respectively. The 2015 effective tax rate exceeds the federal statutory rate, primarily due to state taxes including changes in valuation allowance on state deferred tax assets and revaluation of deferred tax assets due to state law changes and business operations. The 2014 effective tax rate is less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to reversal of a portion of our valuation allowance related to certain state deferred tax assets, along with the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters. The 2013 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance related to our federal and certain state deferred tax assets.


7466


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


TheDeferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. Components of our net deferred tax asset (liability) isare as follows ($000’s omitted):
 
At December 31,At December 31,
2012 20112015 2014
Deferred tax assets:      
Accrued insurance$237,836
 $254,031
Non-deductible reserves and other$486,990
 $446,605
155,488
 191,097
Inventory valuation reserves953,266
 1,197,271
476,673
 599,763
Net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards:      
Federal785,302
 663,733
367,302
 515,568
State320,831
 299,292
274,686
 257,738
Alternative minimum tax credits25,338
 25,193
Energy credit and charitable contribution carryforward38,895
 38,586
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards44,161
 34,812
Energy and other credit carryforwards28,669
 27,858
2,610,622
 2,670,680
1,584,815
 1,880,867
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Capitalized items, including real estate basis differences,
deducted for tax, net
(84,637) (91,399)(39,220) (31,584)
Trademarks and tradenames(56,714) (61,692)(41,664) (46,362)
(141,351) (153,091)(80,884) (77,946)
Valuation allowance(2,469,271) (2,517,589)(109,052) (82,253)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)$
 $
Net deferred tax asset$1,394,879
 $1,720,668
 
DueOur gross federal NOL carryforward is approximately $1.0 billion and expires between 2028 and 2032. We also have significant state NOLs in various jurisdictions which may generally be carried forward from 5 to 20 years, depending on the effectsjurisdiction. The state NOL carryforwards expire at various dates as follows: of the deferredtotal state DTA, $32.2 million from 2016 to 2020, $46.1 million from 2021 to 2025, and $196.4 million from 2026 to 2035. In addition, we have federal energy credit carryforwards expiring in 2026 to 2034 and alternative minimum tax valuation allowance and changes in unrecognized tax benefits, our effective tax rates in 2012, 2011, and 2010 are not correlated to the amount of our income or loss before income taxes. The income tax benefits for 2012, 2011, and 2010 resulted primarily from the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters.credits that can be carried forward indefinitely.

We had income taxes receivable of $31.9 million and $27.2 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The income taxes receivable at December 31, 2012 related primarily to federal and state carryback claims and amended income tax returns.

We evaluate our deferred tax assets each period to determine if a valuation allowance is required. We had netrequired based on whether it is "more likely than not" that some portion of the deferred tax assets of $2.5 billion at December 31, 2012 and 2011.would not be realized. The ultimate realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient taxable income during future periods.  Changes in existing tax laws could also affect actual tax results and the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.  Based onWe conduct our evaluation we fully reserved the net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realizing such deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon an estimate of future results.  Differences between the estimated and actual results could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

We continue to analyzeby considering all available positive and negative evidence in determining the continuing need for a valuation allowance.evidence. This evaluation considers, among other factors, historical operating results, forecasts of future profitability, and the duration of statutory carryforward periods. One ofperiods, and the primary pieces of negative evidence we consider is the significant losses we have incurred in recent years, including being in a significant three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position at December 31, 2012. Other negative evidence includes a challenging U.S. macroeconomic environment and uncertainty regarding the timing of a broad, sustainable recovery in the homebuilding industry. However, we earned a profit before income taxesoutlooks for the year ended December 31, 2012 and have seen significant increases in new orders, backlog, and home sale gross margin. If current business trends continue, including continued improvements in the homebuildingU.S. housing industry and we continue to be profitable, we believe that there could be sufficient positive evidence to support reducing a large portion of the valuation allowance during 2013. Realization of a portion of our deferred tax assets for state NOL carryforwards and other items, however, is more unlikely than the realization of federal deferred tax assets. This is due to the need to generate sufficient taxable income in each of the respective jurisdictions prior to the expirations of the various state carryforward periods, some of which expire sooner than the 20-year federal NOL carryforwards.broader economy.


75


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


As a result of ourthe merger with Centex in August 2009, our ability to use certain of Centex’s pre-ownership change NOL carryforwards and built-in losses or deductions is limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Our Section 382 limitation is approximately $67.4 million per year for NOLs, losses realized on built-in loss assets that are sold within 60 months of the ownership change (i.e. before August 2014), and certain deductions. We do not believe that the Section 382 limitation will prevent the Company from using Centex’s pre-ownership change federal NOL carryforwards and built-in losses. We do believe that certain of our state NOL carryforwards will be limited due to Section 382.
The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results.  Differences between estimated and actual results could result in changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets that could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws could also affect actual tax results and the realization of deferred tax assets over time. In 2014, we recorded an income tax benefit of $45.6 million as the result of a reversal of valuation allowance related primarily to certain of our state deferred tax assets as the result of an increase in expected future taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
In 2013, we recorded an income tax benefit of $2.1 billion as the result of a reversal of valuation allowance. Based on previous evaluations, we had fully reserved our net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of their realization. One of the primary pieces of negative evidence we considered was the significant losses or deductions.we had incurred in the recent years prior to 2013, including being in a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position, which we exited in 2013. During 2013, we

67


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Our grossdetermined that the valuation allowance against substantially all of our federal NOL carryforward is approximately $2.2 billion,deferred tax assets and a significant portion of which is subjectour state deferred tax assets was no longer required. Accordingly, we reversed $2.1 billion of valuation allowance.
We conduct our evaluations by considering all available positive and negative evidence. The principal positive evidence that led to the provisionsreversal of Internal Revenue Code Section 382. We also havethe valuation allowance in 2013 included: (1) our emergence from a three-year cumulative loss in 2013; (2) the significant gross state NOLs in various tax jurisdictions. These NOLs may be carried forward from 5 to 20 years, depending on the tax jurisdiction, with NOLs expiring between 2013positive income we generated during 2012 and 2032.

At 2013, including seven consecutive quarters of pretax income as of December 31, 20122013; (3) continued improvements in 2013 over recent years in other key operating metrics, including revenues, gross margin, and overhead leverage; (4) our forecasted future profitability; (5) improvement in our financial position; and (6) significant evidence that conditions in the U.S. housing industry were more favorable than in recent years and our belief that conditions would continue to be favorable over the long-term. Even if industry conditions weaken from current levels, we believe we will be able to adjust our operations to sustain long-term profitability.
As a result of certain realization requirements of ASC 718, the table of deferred tax assets and liabilities does not include certain deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, that arose directly from tax deductions related to equity compensation greater than compensation recognized for financial reporting. Equity will be increased by $19.4 million if and when such deferred tax assets are ultimately realized. We use the with-and-without approach when determining when excess tax benefits have been realized.
Unrecognized tax benefits represent the difference between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. We had $170.4$39.0 million and $32.9 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits of which $166.3at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Of these amounts, $39.0 million and $32.9 million, respectively, would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. At December 31, 2011, we had $171.9 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $170.6 million would impact the effective rate if recognized. Additionally, we had accrued interest and penalties of $31.5$17.2 million and $36.9$17.3 million at December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. In 2012 and 2011, our income tax expense (benefit) included tax related interest and penalties. Such amounts totaled a benefit of $5.4 million in 2012 and $11.4 million in 2011.

It is reasonably possible within the next twelve months that our gross unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by up to $35.0 million, excluding interest and penalties, primarily due to potential settlements. A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2015 2014 2013
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period$32,911
 $173,310
 $170,425
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period5,763
 
 12,877
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
 (133,883) (7,502)
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
       period
318
 237
 381
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities
 (6,753) (1,434)
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
       limitations

 
 (1,437)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period$38,992
 $32,911
 $173,310

We continue to participate in the Compliance Assurance Process (“CAP”) with the IRS as an alternative to the traditional IRS examination process. As a result of our participation in CAP, federal tax years 2013 and prior are closed. Tax year 2014 is expected to close by the second quarter of 2016, and tax year 2015 is expected to close by the second quarter of 2017. We are currently under examination by the IRS and various state taxing jurisdictions and anticipate finalizing certain of the examinations within the next twelve months. The final outcome of these examinations is not yet determinable. It is reasonably possible, within the next twelve months, that unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by up to $24.9 million, excluding interest and penalties, primarily due to expirations of certain statutes of limitations and potential settlements. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years 20032005 to 2012.

A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2012 2011 2010
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period$171,863
 $258,016
 $326,088
Decreases related to tax positions taken during the current
       period

 
 
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period8,782
 2,699
 55,385
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period(9,373) (79,719) (14,025)
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
       period
11,797
 1,620
 1,441
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities
 
 (94,779)
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
       limitations
(12,644) (10,753) (16,094)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period$170,425
 $171,863
 $258,016

2015.


7668


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


11.10. Fair value disclosures

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” provides a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy can be summarized as follows: 
Level 1 Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
  
Level 2  Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, generally either quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices in markets that are not active.
  
Level 3  Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar techniques

Our assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value are summarized below ($000’s omitted): 
Financial Instrument Fair Value
Hierarchy
 Fair Value Fair Value
Hierarchy
 Fair Value
December 31,
2012
 December 31,
2011
December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
            
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:        
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale Level 2 $318,931
 $258,075
 Level 2 $442,715
 $339,531
Interest rate lock commitments Level 2 6,021
 3,551
 Level 2 5,574
 4,248
Forward contracts Level 2 (646) (3,470) Level 2 338
 (3,574)
Whole loan commitments Level 2 (55) 11
 Level 2 13
 (588)
        
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:        
House and land inventory Level 3 $11,243
 $23,766
 Level 3 $11,052
 $13,925
        
Disclosed at fair value:        
Cash and equivalents (including restricted cash) Level 1 $1,476,710
 $1,184,931
 Level 1 $775,435
 $1,309,220
Financial Services debt Level 2 138,795
 
 Level 2 267,877
 140,241
Term loan Level 2 500,000
 
Senior notes Level 2 2,663,451
 2,765,151
 Level 2 1,643,651
 1,952,774

Fair values for agency residential mortgage loans available-for-sale are determined based on quoted market prices for comparable instruments. Fair values for non-agency residential mortgage loans available-for-sale are determined based on purchase commitments from whole loan investors and other relevant market information available to management. Fair values for interest rate lock commitments, including the value of servicing rights, are based on market prices for similar instruments. Forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities are valued based on market prices for similar instruments. Fair values for whole loan investor commitments are based on market prices for similar instruments from the specific whole loan investor.

Certain assets are required to be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The non-recurring fair valuesvalue included in the above table above represent only those assets whose carrying values were adjusted to fair value inas of the current quarter. House and land inventory measured at fair value represents those communities for which we have recorded impairments during the current period.respective balance sheet dates. See Note 41 for a more detailed discussion of the valuation methods used for inventory.

The carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, and Financial Services debt, the Term Loan, and the Revolving Credit Facility approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.nature and floating interest rate terms. The fair values of senior notes are based on quoted market prices, when available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of similar issues. The carrying value of senior notes was $2.5$1.6 billion and $3.1$1.8 billion,, at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, respectively.


7769


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


12.11. Other assets and accrued and other liabilities

Other assets are presented below ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112015 2014
Accounts and notes receivable (Note 1)
$123,268
 $144,924
Accounts and notes receivable:   
Insurance receivables (Note 12)
$130,170
 $60,598
Notes receivable28,288
 30,699
Other receivables83,177
 63,867
241,635
 155,164
Prepaid expenses74,737
 90,786
109,113
 72,585
Deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 1)
70,116
 57,047
162,119
 127,280
Property and equipment, net (Note 1)
44,183
 53,182
86,312
 75,219
Income taxes receivable (Note 10)
31,924
 27,154
Income taxes receivable (Note 9)
25,080
 21,330
Other63,447
 74,505
46,840
 91,640
$407,675
 $447,598
$671,099
 $543,218

We record receivables from various parties in the normal course of business, including amounts due from insurance companies (see Note 12), municipalities, and vendors. In certain instances, we may accept consideration for land sales or other transactions in the form of a note receivable.

Accrued and other liabilities are presented below ($000’s omitted):
 
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Self-insurance liabilities (Note 13)
$721,284
 $739,029
Loan origination liabilities (Note 13)
164,280
 128,330
Compensation-related119,206
 87,583
Warranty (Note 13)
64,098
 68,025
Community development district obligations (Note 13)
33,119
 38,440
Liability for land, not owned, under option agreements (Note 1)
31,066
 24,905
Accrued interest28,713
 37,943
Lease exit liabilities (Note 3)
22,991
 29,745
Other233,306
 257,941
 $1,418,063
 $1,411,941
 December 31,
 2015 2014
Self-insurance liabilities (Note 12)
$692,053
 $710,245
Loan origination liabilities (Note 12)
46,381
 58,222
Compensation-related124,798
 142,586
Warranty (Note 12)
61,179
 65,389
Community development district obligations (Note 12)
11,964
 17,122
Accrued interest20,541
 20,446
Limited recourse notes payable35,336
 22,255
Dividends payable31,568
 29,682
Other260,453
 277,827
 $1,284,273
 $1,343,774
 

13.

70


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


12. Commitments and Contingenciescontingencies

Leases

We lease certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. The future minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 20122015, are as follows ($000’s omitted): 
Years Ending December 31,  
2013$29,526
201425,510
201522,460
201615,485
$28,561
20179,291
21,353
201818,320
201915,981
20208,940
Thereafter16,486
34,974
Total minimum lease payments (a)
$118,758
$128,129

(a)
Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $15.12.5 million due in the future under non-cancelable subleases.


78


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Net rental expense for 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013 was $24.227.7 million, $26.725.3 million, and $37.223.0 million, respectively, excluding lease exit costs presented in Note 3.respectively. Certain leases contain renewal or purchase options and generally provide that we pay for insurance, taxes, and maintenance.

Loan origination liabilities

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans sold meetmet certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be at fault,faulty, we either repurchase the loans from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a “make-whole” payment).

We sell substantially all ofEstimating the loans we originate to investors in the secondary market within a short period of time after origination. In recent years, we experienced a significant increase inrequired liability for these potential losses as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. In 2006 and 2007, we originated $39.5 billion of loans, excluding loans originated by Centex's former subprime loan business sold by Centex in 2006. Because we generally do not retain the servicing rights to the loans we originate, information regarding the current and historical performance, credit quality, and outstanding balances of such loans is limited. Estimating these loan origination liabilities is further complicated by uncertainties surrounding numerous external factors, such as various macroeconomic factors (including unemployment rates and changes in home prices), actions taken by third parties, including the parties servicing the loans, and the U.S. federal government in its dual capacity as regulator of the U.S. mortgage industry and conservator of the government-sponsored enterprises commonly known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee the majority of mortgage loans in the U.S.

Most requests received to date relate to make-whole payments on loans that have been foreclosed, generally after a portion of the loan principal had been paid down, which reduces our exposure. Requests undergo extensive analysis to confirm the exposure, attempt to cure the identified defect, and, when necessary, determine our liability. We establish liabilities for such anticipated losses based upon, among other things, the level of current unresolved repurchase requests, the volume of estimated probable future repurchase requests, our ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase requests, and the severity of the estimated loss upon repurchase. Determining these estimates and the resulting liability requires a significant level of management judgment. We are generally able to cure or refute over 60%During 2015 and 2014, we reduced our loan origination liabilities by net reserve releases of the$11.4 million and $18.6 million, respectively, based on probable settlements of various repurchase requests received from investors such that we do not believe repurchases or make-whole payments will ultimately be required. For those requests that we believe will result in repurchases or make-whole payments, actual loss severities are expected to approximate 50% of the outstanding principal balance.

During 2012, 2011, and 2010, we recorded additional provisions for losses as a change in estimate primarily to reflect projected claim volumes in excess of previous estimates. Such provisions for lossescurrent conditions. Reserves provided (released) are reflected in Financial Services expenses. Our current estimates assume that such requests will continue through 2014. Given the ongoing volatility in the mortgage industry, our lackchanges in values of visibility into the current status of the review process of loans by investors, the claim volumes we continue to experience,underlying collateral over time, and other uncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, it is reasonably possible that future losses may exceedactual costs could differ from our current estimates.

Changes in these liabilities were as follows ($000's omitted):
 
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Liabilities, beginning of period$128,330
 $93,057
 $105,914
$58,222
 $124,956
 $164,280
Reserves provided49,025
 59,349
 16,856
Reserves provided (released), net(11,433) (18,604) 
Payments(13,075) (24,076) (29,713)(408) (48,130) (39,324)
Liabilities, end of period$164,280
 $128,330
 $93,057
$46,381
 $58,222
 $124,956


7971


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


We entered into an agreement in conjunction with the wind down of Centex's mortgage operations, which ceased loan origination activities in December 2009, that provides a guaranty for one major investor of loans originated by Centex. This guaranty provides that we will honor the potential repurchase obligations of Centex's mortgage operations related to breaches of representations and warranties in the origination of a certain pool of loans. Other than with respect to this pool of loans, our contractual repurchase obligations are limited to our mortgage subsidiaries, which are included in non-guarantor subsidiaries (see Note 14 for a discussion of non-guarantor subsidiaries).

The mortgage subsidiary of Centex also sold loans to a bank for inclusion in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBSs”) issued by the bank. In connection with these sales, Centex's mortgage subsidiary entered into agreements pursuant to which it may be required to indemnify the bank for losses incurred by investors in the RMBSs arising out of material errors or omissions in certain information provided by the mortgage subsidiary relating to the loans and loan origination process. In 2011, the bank notified us that it has been named defendant in two lawsuits alleging various violations of federal and state securities laws asserting that untrue statements of material fact were included in the registration statements used to market the sale of two RMBS transactions which included $162 million of loans originated by Centex's mortgage subsidiary. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory and/or rescissory damages on behalf of persons who purchased the securities. Neither Centex's mortgage subsidiary nor the Company is named as a defendant in these actions. These actions are in their preliminary stage, and we cannot yet quantify Centex's mortgage subsidiary's potential liability as a result of these indemnification obligations. We do not believe, however, that these matters will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. We are aware of six other RMBS transactions with such indemnity provisions that include an aggregate $116 million of loans, and we are not aware of any current or threatened legal proceedings regarding those transactions.

Community development and other special district obligations

A community development district or similar development authority (“CDD”) is a unit of local government created under various state statutes that utilizes the proceeds from the sale of bonds to finance the construction or acquisition of infrastructure assets of a development. A portion of the liability associated with the bonds, including principal and interest, is assigned to each parcel of land within the development. This debt is typically paid by subsequent special assessments levied by the CDD on the landowners. Generally, we are only responsible for paying the special assessments for the period induring which we are the landowner of the applicable parcels. However, in certain limited instances we record a liability for future assessments that are fixed or determinable for a fixed or determinable period.assessments. At December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, we had recorded $33.112.0 million and $38.417.1 million, respectively, in accrued liabilities for outstanding CDD obligations. During 2011 and 2010, we repurchased at a discount prior to their maturity CDD obligations with aggregate principal balances of $26.6 million and $124.1 million, respectively, in order to improve the future financial performance of the related communities. The discounts of $5.2 million in 2011 and $12.9 million in 2010 are recognized as a reduction of cost of revenues over the lives of the applicable communities, which will extend for several years. There were no repurchases during 2012.

Letters of credit and surety bonds

In the normal course of business, we post letters of credit and surety bonds pursuant to certain performance-related obligations, as security for certain land option agreements, and under various insurance programs. The majority of these letters of credit and surety bonds are in support of our land development and construction obligations to various municipalities, other government agencies, and utility companies related to the construction of roads, sewers, and other infrastructure. We had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds totaling $179.2$191.3 million and $1.0$1.0 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2012,2015, and $212.1 million and $1.0 billion, respectively, and $235.9 million and $1.2 billionat December 31, 2011, respectively.2014. In the event any such letter of credit or surety bonds are called,is drawn, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit or surety bond. We do not believe that a material amount, if any, of the letters of credit or surety bonds will be called.drawn. Our surety bonds generally do not have stated expiration dates; rather we are released from the surety bonds as the underlying contractual performance is completed. Because significant construction and development work has been performed related to the applicable projects but has not yet received final acceptance by the respective counterparties, the aggregate amount of surety bonds outstanding is in excess of the projected cost of the remaining work to be performed.


80


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Litigation and regulatory matters

We are involved in various litigation and legal claims in the normal course of our business operations, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to a variety of local, state, and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, mortgage lending operations, employment practices, and protection of the environment. As a result, we are subject to periodic examination or inquiry by various governmental agencies that administer these laws and regulations.

We establish liabilities for legal claims and regulatory matters when such matters are both probable of occurring and any potential loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue for such matters based on the facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revise these estimates as the matters evolve. In such cases, there may exist an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts currently accrued. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of these legal and regulatory matters, we generally cannot predict the ultimate resolution of the pending matters, the related timing, or the eventual loss. While the outcome of such contingencies cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the resolution of such matters will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. However, to the extent the liability arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds the estimates reflected in the recorded reserves relating to such matter, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.

In September 2012, Applecross Club Operations ("Applecross") filed a complaint for breach of contract and promissory estoppel in Applecross v. Pulte Homes of PA, et al. The complaint alleged that we induced Applecross to purchase a golf course from us in 2010 by promising to build over 1,000 residential units in a planned community located outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In September 2015, the jury in the case found in favor of Applecross and awarded damages in the amount of $20.0 million. We believe we have meritorious defenses and have filed post-trial motions seeking to, among other things, overturn the jury verdict. If unsuccessful, we plan to appeal the award. However, in light of the jury’s verdict, we recorded a reserve of $20.0 million in 2015, which is reflected in other expense, net

During 2013, we settled a number of claims related to a previously completed luxury community in a market we have since exited. The claims related to a contractual dispute with certain homeowners. As a result of these settlements, we recorded charges of $41.2 million during 2013, which are reflected in other expense, net.


72


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Allowance for warranties

Home purchasers are provided with a limited warranty against certain building defects, including a one-year comprehensive limited warranty and coverage for certain other aspects of the home’s construction and operating systems for periods of up to ten10 years. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record liabilities in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liabilities include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and the cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of the warranty liabilities for each geographic market in which we operate and adjust the amounts as necessary. Actual warranty costs in the future could differ from the current estimates.

Changes to warranty liabilities were as follows ($000’s omitted):
 
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Warranty liabilities, beginning of period$68,025
 $80,195
 $96,110
$65,389
 $63,992
 $64,098
Reserves provided45,705
 43,875
 54,164
52,684
 51,348
 49,399
Payments(45,365) (54,766) (69,789)(60,968) (47,968) (44,925)
Other adjustments(4,267) (1,279) (290)4,074
 (1,983) (4,580)
Warranty liabilities, end of period$64,098
 $68,025
 $80,195
$61,179
 $65,389
 $63,992

Self-insured risks

We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance coverage. We also maintain builders' risk, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of the risk of loss from claims. However, we retain a significant portion of the overall risk for such claims either through policies issued by our captive insurance subsidiaries or through our own self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and claims in excess of available insurance policy limits.

Our general liability insurance includes coverage for certain construction defects. While construction defect claims can relate to a variety of circumstances, the majority of our claims relate to alleged problems with siding, plumbing, foundations and other concrete work, windows, roofing, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. The availability of general liability insurance for the homebuilding industry and its subcontractors has become increasingly limited, and the insurance policies available require companies to maintain highersignificant per occurrence and aggregate retention levels. In certain instances, we may offer our subcontractors the opportunity to purchase insurance through one of our captive insurance subsidiaries or to participate in a project-specific insurance program provided by the Company.us. Policies issued by the captive insurance subsidiaries represent self-insurance of these risks by the Company.us. This self-insured exposure is limited by reinsurance policies that we purchase. General liability coverage for the homebuilding industry is complex, and our coverage varies from policy year to policy year. Our insurance coverage requires a per occurrence deductible up to an overall aggregate retention level. Beginning with the first dollar, amounts paid onto satisfy insured claims

81


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


satisfy apply to our per occurrence and aggregate retention obligations. Any amounts incurred in excess of the occurrence or aggregate retention levels are covered by insurance up to our purchased coverage levels. Our insurance policies, including the captive insurance subsidiaries' reinsurance policies, are maintained with highly-rated underwriters for whom we believe counterparty default risk is not significant.

At any point in time, we are managing over 1,000 individual claims related to general liability, property, errors and omission, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. We reserve for costs associated with such claims (including expected claims management expenses relating to legal fees, expert fees, and claims handling expenses) on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims. The actuarial analyses calculate an estimateestimates of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates for incurred but not reported losses ("IBNR"). IBNR represents losses related to claims incurred but not yet reported plus development on reported claims. These

Our recorded reserves for all such claims totaled $692.1 million and $710.2 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the vast majority of which relates to general liability claims. The recorded reserves include loss estimates make uprelated to both (i) existing claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 65% and 72% of the total general liability reserves at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determine the IBNR portion of reserves consider a significant portionvariety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience

73


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of the reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses.

Housing market conditions have been volatile across most of our markets over the past ten years, and we believe such conditions can affect the frequency and cost of construction defect claims. Additionally, IBNR estimates comprise the majority of our liability and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to a variety of factors, including changes in claims reporting and resolution patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent. State regulations vary, but construction defect claims are reported and resolved over an extended period often exceeding ten years. Changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves. Additionally, the amount of insurance coverage available for each policy period also impacts our recorded reserves. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related and the timing of such losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs.

Adjustments to reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. During 2015, we recorded general liability reserve reversals of $32.6 million resulting from a legal settlement and $29.6 million related to changes in our actuarial estimates resulting from favorable claims experience relative to previous actuarial projections. During 2014, we increased general liability insurance reserves by $69.3 million, which was primarily driven by estimated costs associated with siding repairs in certain previously completed communities that, in turn, impacted actuarial estimates for potential future claims. Such adjustments are reflected in "Reserves provided, net" in the below table.

Costs associated with our insurance programs are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses. Changes in these liabilities were as follows ($000's omitted):
 2015 2014 2013
Balance, beginning of period$710,245
 $668,100
 $721,284
Reserves provided, net16,085
 141,790
 64,737
Payments(34,277) (99,645) (117,921)
Balance, end of period$692,053
 $710,245
 $668,100

In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies or from subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable. As reflected in

Note 11Our recorded reserves for all such claims, our receivables from insurance carriers totaled $721.3$130.2 million and $739.0$60.6 million at December 31, 20122015 and 2011, respectively,2014, respectively. The increase in insurance receivables resulted from the vast majoritycontinued progression of which relate to general liabilityinsured construction defect claims. The recorded reserves include loss estimates related to both (i) existingGiven the complexity inherent with resolving construction defect claims in the homebuilding industry as described above, there generally exists a significant lag between our payment of claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 74% and 78% ofour reimbursements from applicable insurance carriers. Additionally, we are the total general liability reserves at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determine the IBNR portion of reserves consider a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of the reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses.

Adjustments to estimated reserves are recordedplaintiff in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. Because the majoritylitigation with certain of our recorded reserves relatesinsurance carriers relating to IBNR, adjustments to reserve amounts for individual existing claims generally do not impact the recorded reserves materially. However, changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and the estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs.

We have experienced a high level of insurance-related expenses in recent years, primarily due to the adverse development of general liability claims, the frequency and severity of which have increased significantly over historical levels. During 2010, we experienced a greater than anticipated frequency of newly reported claims and a significant increase in specific case reserves related to certain known claims. The general nature of these claims was not out of the ordinary, but the frequency and severity of the claims were in excess of our historical experience. As a result of these unfavorable trends, we recorded additional reserves totaling $280.4 million ($0.74 per basic and diluted share) within selling, general, and administrative expenses. Substantially all of this additional reserve related to general liability exposures, a large portion of which resulted from revisingthe insurance receivables balance. We believe collection of these insurance receivables is probable based on the legal merits of our actuarial assumptions surroundingpositions, favorable legal rulings received to date, and our long history of collecting significant amounts of insurance reimbursements under similar insurance policies related to similar claims. While the long-term frequency, severity, and developmentoutcome of claims. During the industry downturn over the last several years, and especially in 2010,these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we experienced adverse claim frequency and severity compared with longer term averages. In 2010, we deemed it appropriate to assumedo not believe that the long-term future frequency, severity, and developmentresolution of claimssuch matters will most closely resemble the claims activity experienced in recent years.have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.


82


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Changes in these liabilities were as follows ($000's omitted):
 2012 2011 2010
Balance, beginning of period$739,029
 $787,918
 $551,020
Reserves provided54,262
 48,359
 313,606
Liabilities assumed with Centex merger
 
 2,514
Payments(72,007) (97,248) (79,222)
Balance, end of period$721,284
 $739,029
 $787,918

As reflected in the above table, insurance-related liabilities increased $2.5 million upon completion of a final valuation of the Centex merger in 2010. The reserves provided reflected in the above table are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses.

14.13. Supplemental Guarantor information

All of our senior notes are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior basis by eachcertain of the Company'sour wholly-owned Homebuilding subsidiaries and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”). Such guaranties are full and unconditional. SupplementalOur subsidiaries comprising the Financial Services segment along with certain other subsidiaries (collectively, the "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries") do not guarantee the senior notes. In accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company, including such information for the Guarantors, is presented below. Investments in subsidiaries are presented using the equity method of accounting. Separate financial statements of the Guarantors are not provided as the consolidating financial information contained herein provides a more meaningful disclosure to allow investors to determine the nature of the assets held by, and the operations of, the combined groups.    



8374


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 20122015
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
ASSETS                  
Cash and equivalents$146,168
 $1,063,943
 $194,649
 $
 $1,404,760
$
 $638,602
 $115,559
 $
 $754,161
Restricted cash54,546
 3,365
 14,039
 
 71,950

 20,274
 1,000
 
 21,274
House and land inventory
 4,210,201
 3,845
 
 4,214,046

 5,450,058
 
 
 5,450,058
Land held for sale
 91,104
 
 
 91,104

 80,458
 1,034
 
 81,492
Land, not owned, under option
agreements

 31,066
 
 
 31,066
Residential mortgage loans available-
for-sale

 
 318,931
 
 318,931

 
 442,715
 
 442,715
Investments in unconsolidated entities1,528
 40,973
 3,128
 
 45,629
93
 36,499
 4,675
 
 41,267
Other assets28,951
 324,109
 54,615
 
 407,675
49,255
 531,120
 90,724
 

 671,099
Intangible assets
 149,248
 
 
 149,248

 110,215
 
 
 110,215
Deferred tax assets, net1,392,251
 11
 2,617
 
 1,394,879
Investments in subsidiaries and
intercompany accounts, net
4,723,466
 7,198,710
 6,296,915
 (18,219,091) 
5,529,606
 465,644
 6,293,018
 (12,288,268) 
$4,954,659
 $13,112,719
 $6,886,122
 $(18,219,091) $6,734,409
$6,971,205
 $7,332,881
 $6,951,342
 $(12,288,268) $8,967,160
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                  
Liabilities:                  
Accounts payable, customer deposits,
accrued and other liabilities
$56,565
 $1,343,653
 $297,302
 $
 $1,697,520
$70,061
 $1,558,885
 $169,193
 $
 $1,798,139
Income tax liabilities198,865
 
 
 
 198,865
57,050
 
 
 
 57,050
Financial Services debt
 
 138,795
 
 138,795

 
 267,877
 
 267,877
Term loan500,000
 
 
 
 500,000
Senior notes2,509,613
 
 
 
 2,509,613
1,584,769
 
 
 
 1,584,769
Total liabilities2,765,043
 1,343,653
 436,097
 
 4,544,793
2,211,880
 1,558,885
 437,070
 
 4,207,835
Total shareholders’ equity2,189,616
 11,769,066
 6,450,025
 (18,219,091) 2,189,616
4,759,325
 5,773,996
 6,514,272
 (12,288,268) 4,759,325
$4,954,659
 $13,112,719
 $6,886,122
 $(18,219,091) $6,734,409
$6,971,205
 $7,332,881
 $6,951,342
 $(12,288,268) $8,967,160

8475


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 20112014
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
ASSETS  
 
      
 
    
Cash and equivalents$119,287
 $875,561
 $88,223
 $
 $1,083,071
$7,454
 $1,157,307
 $128,101
 $
 $1,292,862
Restricted cash83,199
 3,255
 15,406
 
 101,860
3,710
 1,513
 11,135
 
 16,358
House and land inventory
 4,632,337
 4,131
 
 4,636,468

 4,391,445
 655
 
 4,392,100
Land held for sale
 135,307
 
 
 135,307

 100,156
 1,034
 
 101,190
Land, not owned, under option
agreements

 24,905
 
 
 24,905
Residential mortgage loans available-
for-sale

 
 258,075
 
 258,075

 
 339,531
 
 339,531
Securities purchased under agreements
to resell
127,327
 
 (127,327) 
 
22,000
 
 (22,000) 
 
Investments in unconsolidated entities1,527
 31,836
 2,625
 
 35,988
74
 36,126
 4,168
 
 40,368
Other assets32,620
 364,770
 50,208
 
 447,598
34,214
 451,331
 57,673
 
 543,218
Intangible assets
 162,348
 
 
 162,348

 123,115
 
 
 123,115
Deferred tax assets, net1,712,853
 15
 7,800
 
 1,720,668
Investments in subsidiaries and
intercompany accounts, net
4,937,002
 6,533,838
 6,366,758
 (17,837,598) 
4,963,831
 967,032
 6,359,441
 (12,290,304) 
$5,300,962
 $12,764,157
 $6,658,099
 $(17,837,598) $6,885,620
$6,744,136
 $7,228,040
 $6,887,538
 $(12,290,304) $8,569,410
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                  
Liabilities:                  
Accounts payable, customer deposits,
accrued and other liabilities
$70,690
 $1,310,972
 $273,686
 $
 $1,655,348
$71,874
 $1,514,954
 $170,104
 $
 $1,756,932
Income tax liabilities203,313
 
 
 
 203,313
48,747
 (25) 
 
 48,722
Financial Services debt
 
 140,241
 
 140,241
Senior notes3,088,344
 
 
 
 3,088,344
1,818,561
 
 
 
 1,818,561
Total liabilities3,362,347
 1,310,972
 273,686
 
 4,947,005
1,939,182
 1,514,929
 310,345
 
 3,764,456
Total shareholders’ equity1,938,615
 11,453,185
 6,384,413
 (17,837,598) 1,938,615
4,804,954
 5,713,111
 6,577,193
 (12,290,304) 4,804,954
$5,300,962
 $12,764,157
 $6,658,099
 $(17,837,598) $6,885,620
$6,744,136
 $7,228,040
 $6,887,538
 $(12,290,304) $8,569,410


8576


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the year ended December 31, 20122015
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Revenues:                  
Homebuilding                  
Home sale revenues$
 $4,552,412
 $
 $
 $4,552,412
$
 $5,792,675
 $
 $
 $5,792,675
Land sale revenues
 106,698
 
 
 106,698

 48,536
 
 
 48,536

 4,659,110
 
 
 4,659,110

 5,841,211
 
 
 5,841,211
Financial Services
 2,082
 158,806
 
 160,888

 1
 140,752
 
 140,753

 4,661,192
 158,806
 
 4,819,998

 5,841,212
 140,752
 
 5,981,964
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:                  
Home sale cost of revenues
 3,833,451
 
 
 3,833,451

 4,440,893
 
 
 4,440,893
Land sale cost of revenues
 94,880
 
 
 94,880

 35,858
 
 
 35,858

 3,928,331
 
 
 3,928,331

 4,476,751
 
 
 4,476,751
Financial Services expenses379
 567
 134,565
 
 135,511
313
 (276) 82,010
 
 82,047
Selling, general and administrative
expenses

 515,283
 (826) 
 514,457
Other expense (income), net32,027
 33,506
 765
 
 66,298
Interest income(229) (4,597) (87) 
 (4,913)
Interest expense819
 
 
 
 819
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
3
 585,870
 3,907
 
 589,780
Other expense, net760
 17,424
 (821) 
 17,363
Intercompany interest587,281
 (573,852) (13,429) 
 
2,110
 7,922
 (10,032) 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated entities
(1) (3,555) (503) 
 (4,059)
Income (loss) before income taxes and
equity in income (loss) of
subsidiaries
(620,276) 765,509
 38,321
 
 183,554
(3,186) 753,521
 65,688
 
 816,023
Income tax expense (benefit)426
 (22,299) (718) 
 (22,591)(1,210) 297,485
 25,658
 
 321,933
Income (loss) before equity in income
(loss) of subsidiaries
(620,702) 787,808
 39,039
 
 206,145
(1,976) 456,036
 40,030
 
 494,090
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries826,847
 34,596
 476,806
 (1,338,249) 
496,066
 40,484
 411,699
 (948,249) 
Net income (loss)206,145
 822,404
 515,845
 (1,338,249) 206,145
494,090
 496,520
 451,729
 (948,249) 494,090
Other comprehensive income (loss)314
 
 
 
 314
81
 
 
 
 81
Comprehensive income (loss)$206,459
 $822,404
 $515,845
 $(1,338,249) $206,459
$494,171
 $496,520
 $451,729
 $(948,249) $494,171


8677


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the year ended December 31, 20112014
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Revenues:                  
Homebuilding                  
Home sale revenues$
 $3,950,743
 $
 $
 $3,950,743
$
 $5,662,171
 $
 $
 $5,662,171
Land sale revenues
 82,853
 
 
 82,853

 34,554
 
 
 34,554

 4,033,596
 
 
 4,033,596

 5,696,725
 
 
 5,696,725
Financial Services
 1,367
 101,727
 
 103,094

 889
 124,749
 
 125,638

 4,034,963
 101,727
 
 4,136,690

 5,697,614
 124,749
 
 5,822,363
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:                  
Home sale cost of revenues
 3,444,398
 
 
 3,444,398

 4,343,249
 
 
 4,343,249
Land sale cost of revenues
 59,279
 
 
 59,279

 23,748
 
 
 23,748

 3,503,677
 
 
 3,503,677

 4,366,997
 
 
 4,366,997
Financial Services expenses343
 448
 136,875
 
 137,666
784
 (130) 70,403
 
 71,057
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
33,144
 488,746
 (2,307) 
 519,583
Other expense (income), net5,581
 288,298
 (777) 
 293,102
Interest income(253) (4,443) (359) 
 (5,055)
Interest expense1,313
 
 
 
 1,313
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses

 661,308
 6,507
 
 667,815
Other expense, net9,026
 16,847
 863
 
 26,736
Intercompany interest39,060
 (27,572) (11,488) 
 
9,800
 (90) (9,710) 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated entities
(5) (3,196) (95) 
 (3,296)
Income (loss) before income taxes and
equity in income (loss) of
subsidiaries
(79,183) (210,995) (20,122) 
 (310,300)(19,610) 652,682
 56,686
 
 689,758
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,623) (99,635) 2,346
 
 (99,912)(7,473) 201,332
 21,561
 
 215,420
Income (loss) before equity in income
(loss) of subsidiaries
(76,560) (111,360) (22,468) 
 (210,388)(12,137) 451,350
 35,125
 
 474,338
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries(133,828) (25,427) (88,998) 248,253
 
486,475
 38,534
 403,505
 (928,514) 
Net income (loss)(210,388) (136,787) (111,466) 248,253
 (210,388)474,338
 489,884
 438,630
 (928,514) 474,338
Other comprehensive income (loss)213
 
 
 
 213
105
 
 
 
 105
Comprehensive income (loss)$(210,175) $(136,787) $(111,466) $248,253
 $(210,175)$474,443
 $489,884
 $438,630
 $(928,514) $474,443

8778


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the year ended December 31, 20102013
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Revenues:                  
Homebuilding                  
Home sale revenues$
 $4,419,812
 $
 $
 $4,419,812
$
 $5,424,309
 $
 $
 $5,424,309
Land sale revenues
 27,815
 
 
 27,815

 114,335
 
 
 114,335

 4,447,627
 
 
 4,447,627

 5,538,644
 
 
 5,538,644
Financial Services
 3,119
 118,544
 
 121,663

 2,353
 138,598
 
 140,951

 4,450,746
 118,544
 
 4,569,290

 5,540,997
 138,598
 
 5,679,595
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:                  
Home sale cost of revenues
 4,006,385
 
 
 4,006,385

 4,310,528
 
 
 4,310,528
Land sale cost of revenues
 53,555
 
 
 53,555

 104,426
 
 
 104,426

 4,059,940
 
 
 4,059,940

 4,414,954
 
 
 4,414,954
Financial Services expenses338
 (1,462) 117,246
 
 116,122
832
 970
 90,440
 
 92,242
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
64,197
 629,099
 201,806
 
 895,102
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses

 573,904
 (5,404) 
 568,500
Other expense (income), net38,899
 707,647
 (4,161) 
 742,385
28,694
 43,944
 3,439
 
 76,077
Interest income
 (9,060) (471) 
 (9,531)
Interest expense2,802
 
 (73) 
 2,729
Intercompany interest169,158
 (169,010) (148) 
 
17,518
 (8,260) (9,258) 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated entities
(11) (3,867) 967
 
 (2,911)
Income (loss) before income taxes and
equity in income (loss) of
subsidiaries
(275,383) (762,541) (196,622) 
 (1,234,546)(47,044) 515,485
 59,381
 
 527,822
Income tax expense (benefit)58,318
 (136,741) (59,394) 
 (137,817)(2,113,827) (799) 22,332
 
 (2,092,294)
Income (loss) before equity in income
(loss) of subsidiaries
(333,701) (625,800) (137,228) 
 (1,096,729)2,066,783
 516,284
 37,049
 
 2,620,116
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries(763,028) (5,009) (172,241) 940,278
 
553,333
 35,086
 485,400
 (1,073,819) 
Net income (loss)(1,096,729) (630,809) (309,469) 940,278
 (1,096,729)2,620,116
 551,370
 522,449
 (1,073,819) 2,620,116
Other comprehensive income (loss)730
 
 
 
 730
197
 
 
 
 197
Comprehensive income (loss)$(1,095,999) $(630,809) $(309,469) $940,278
 $(1,095,999)$2,620,313
 $551,370
 $522,449
 $(1,073,819) $2,620,313

8879


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, 20122015
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
$(582,762) $1,332,342
 $10,560
 $
 $760,140
$184,033
 $(449,701) $(82,461) $
 $(348,129)
Cash flows from investing activities:                  
Distributions from unconsolidated
entities

 3,029
 
 
 3,029
Investments in unconsolidated entities
 (16,456) 
 
 (16,456)
Net change in loans held for investment
 
 836
 
 836

 
 8,664
 
 8,664
Change in restricted cash related to
letters of credit
28,653
 
 
 
 28,653
3,710
 
 
 
 3,710
Proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment

 7,586
 
 
 7,586
Capital expenditures
 (10,831) (3,111) 
 (13,942)
 (41,857) (3,583) 
 (45,440)
Other investing activities, net
 1,937
 275
 
 2,212
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
28,653
 (16,672) (2,275) 
 9,706
3,710
 (39,920) 5,356
 
 (30,854)
Cash flows from financing activities:                  
Financial Services borrowings
(repayments)

 
 138,795
 
 138,795

 
 127,636
 
 127,636
Other borrowings (repayments)
(620,700) 1,900
 
 
 (618,800)
Proceeds from debt issuance500,000
 
 
   500,000
Repayments of debt(237,995) (1,198) 
 
 (239,193)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility125,000
 
 
 
 125,000
Repayments under revolving credit facility(125,000) 
 
 
 (125,000)
Stock option exercises32,809
 
 
 
 32,809
10,535
 
 
 
 10,535
Stock repurchases(961) 
 
 
 (961)
Share repurchases(442,738) 
 
 
 (442,738)
Dividends paid(115,958) 
 
 
 (115,958)
Intercompany activities, net1,169,842
 (1,129,188) (40,654) 
 
90,959
 (27,886) (63,073) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
580,990
 (1,127,288) 98,141
 
 (448,157)(195,197) (29,084) 64,563
 
 (159,718)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
equivalents
26,881
 188,382
 106,426
 
 321,689
(7,454) (518,705) (12,542) 
 (538,701)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year119,287
 875,561
 88,223
 
 1,083,071
7,454
 1,157,307
 128,101
 
 1,292,862
Cash and equivalents at end of year$146,168
 $1,063,943
 $194,649
 $
 $1,404,760
$
 $638,602
 $115,559
 $
 $754,161


8980


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, 20112014
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
$(86,000) $520,024
 $(416,745) $
 $17,279
$206,485
 $175,415
 $(72,651) $
 $309,249
Cash flows from investing activities:                  
Distributions from unconsolidated
entities

 4,531
 
 
 4,531
Investments in unconsolidated entities
 (4,603) 
 
 (4,603)
Net change in loans held for investment
 
 325
 
 325

 
 335
 
 335
Change in restricted cash related to
letters of credit
(83,199) 
 
 
 (83,199)54,989
 
 
 
 54,989
Proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment

 10,555
 
 
 10,555
Capital expenditures
 (18,331) (2,907) 
 (21,238)
 (44,956) (3,834) 
 (48,790)
Cash used for business acquisitions
 (82,419) 
 
 (82,419)
Other investing activities, net
 8,274
 (13) 
 8,261
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
(83,199) (7,848) (2,582) 
 (93,629)54,989
 (119,101) (3,512) 
 (67,624)
Cash flows from financing activities:                  
Other borrowings (repayments)(320,973) (160) 
 
 (321,133)
Stock repurchases(2,836) 
 
 
 (2,836)
Financial Services borrowings
(repayments)

 
 34,577
 
 34,577
Repayments of debt(249,765) (866) 
 
 (250,631)
Stock option exercises15,627
 
 
 
 15,627
Share repurchases(253,019) 
 
 
 (253,019)
Dividends paid(75,646) 
 
 
 (75,646)
Intercompany activities, net602,295
 (743,078) 140,783
 
 
46,419
 (87,140) 40,721
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
278,486
 (743,238) 140,783
 
 (323,969)(516,384) (88,006) 75,298
 
 (529,092)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
equivalents
109,287
 (231,062) (278,544) 
 (400,319)(254,910) (31,692) (865) 
 (287,467)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year10,000
 1,106,623
 366,767
 
 1,483,390
262,364
 1,188,999
 128,966
 
 1,580,329
Cash and equivalents at end of year$119,287
 $875,561
 $88,223
 $
 $1,083,071
$7,454
 $1,157,307
 $128,101
 $
 $1,292,862

9081


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, 20102013
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
$552,697
 $34,853
 $4,574
 $
 $592,124
$(41) $865,267
 $15,910
 $
 $881,136
Cash flows from investing activities:                  
Distributions from unconsolidated
entities

 4,231
 
 
 4,231
Investments in unconsolidated entities
 (21,623) (1,267) 
 (22,890)
Net change in loans held for
investment

 
 12,603
 
 12,603

 
 (12,265) 
 (12,265)
Proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment

 1,762
 18
 
 1,780
Change in restricted cash related to
letters of credit
(4,152) 
 
 
 (4,152)
Capital expenditures
 (13,168) (2,011) 
 (15,179)
 (26,472) (2,427) 
 (28,899)
Other investing activities, net
 (661) 
 
 (661)
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities

 (28,798) 9,343
 
 (19,455)(4,152) (27,133) (14,692) 
 (45,977)
Cash flows from financing activities:                  
Financial Services borrowings (repayments)
 
 (18,394) 
 (18,394)
 
 (33,131) 
 (33,131)
Other borrowings (repayments)(934,473) (1,444) 
 
 (935,917)
Repayments of debt(485,048) 5,221
 

 
 (479,827)
Stock option exercises8,668
 
 
 
 8,668
19,411
 
 
 
 19,411
Stock repurchases(4,023) 
 
 
 (4,023)
Share repurchases(127,661) 
 
 
 (127,661)
Dividends paid(38,382) 
 
 
 (38,382)
Intercompany activities, net387,131
 (404,757) 17,626
 
 
752,069
 (718,299) (33,770) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
(542,697) (406,201) (768) 
 (949,666)120,389
 (713,078) (66,901) 
 (659,590)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
equivalents
10,000
 (400,146) 13,149
 
 (376,997)116,196
 125,056
 (65,683) 
 175,569
Cash and equivalents at beginning of
year

 1,506,769
 353,618
 
 1,860,387
146,168
 1,063,943
 194,649
 
 1,404,760
Cash and equivalents at end of year$10,000
 $1,106,623
 $366,767
 $
 $1,483,390
$262,364
 $1,188,999
 $128,966
 $
 $1,580,329


9182


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


15.14. Quarterly Results (Unaudited)results (unaudited)
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (c)
1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (a)
2012         
2015         
Homebuilding:                  
Revenues$852,184
 $1,033,154
 $1,255,327
 $1,518,445
 $4,659,110
$1,105,700
 $1,249,537
 $1,467,780
 $2,018,194
 $5,841,211
Cost of revenues745,563
 876,990
 1,044,765
 1,261,012
 3,928,331
854,523
 958,592
 1,122,175
 1,541,461
 4,476,751
Income (loss) before income taxes (a)
(20,352) 23,939
 79,179
 75,225
 157,991
Income before income taxes (b)
90,748
 157,640
 164,911
 344,019
 757,317
Financial Services:                  
Revenues$28,852
 $36,251
 $47,264
 $48,521
 $160,888
$27,598
 $30,754
 $38,967
 $43,434
 $140,753
Income (loss) before income taxes (b)
6,861
 15,987
 26,727
 (24,012) 25,563
Income before income taxes (c)
5,057
 9,987
 14,365
 29,297
 58,706
Consolidated results:                  
Revenues$881,036
 $1,069,405
 $1,302,591
 $1,566,966
 $4,819,998
$1,133,298
 $1,280,291
 $1,506,747
 $2,061,628
 $5,981,964
Income (loss) before income taxes(13,491) 39,926
 105,906
 51,213
 183,554
Income tax benefit(1,825) (2,510) (10,727) (7,529) (22,591)
Net income (loss)$(11,666) $42,436
 $116,633
 $58,742
 $206,145
Net income (loss) per share:         
Income before income taxes95,805
 167,627
 179,276
 373,315
 816,023
Income tax expense40,834
 64,303
 71,507
 145,288
 321,933
Net income$54,971
 $103,324
 $107,769
 $228,027
 $494,090
Net income per share:         
Basic$(0.03) $0.11
 $0.31
 $0.15
 $0.54
$0.15
 $0.28
 $0.31
 $0.65
 $1.38
Diluted$(0.03) $0.11
 $0.30
 $0.15
 $0.54
$0.15
 $0.28
 $0.30
 $0.64
 $1.36
Number of shares used in calculation:                  
Basic380,502
 380,655
 381,355
 383,404
 381,562
366,748
 361,009
 350,147
 348,699
 356,576
Effect of dilutive securities
 1,548
 3,215
 5,900
 3,002
3,362
 3,232
 3,225
 3,047
 3,217
Diluted380,502
 382,203
 384,570
 389,304
 384,564
370,110
 364,241
 353,372
 351,746
 359,793

(a)
Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes includes losses on debt retirements totaling $32.1 million in the 4th Quarter.
(b)
Financial Services income (loss) before income taxes includes additional loan origination reserves of $49.0 million in the 4th Quarter.
(c)Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. Additionally, quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.

92


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
 1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (c)
2011         
Homebuilding:         
Revenues$783,767
 $904,831
 $1,114,027
 $1,230,971
 $4,033,596
Cost of revenues685,960
 793,465
 944,882
 1,079,370
 3,503,677
Income (loss) before income taxes (a)
(46,365) (36,690) (211,126) 18,351
 (275,830)
Financial Services:         
Revenues$21,435
 $22,381
 $27,904
 $31,374
 $103,094
Income (loss) before income taxes (b)
973
 (16,643) 8,626
 (27,426) (34,470)
Consolidated results:         
Revenues$805,202
 $927,212
 $1,141,931
 $1,262,345
 $4,136,690
Income (loss) before income taxes(45,392) (53,333) (202,500) (9,075) (310,300)
Income tax expense (benefit)(5,866) 2,052
 (73,202) (22,896) (99,912)
Net income (loss)$(39,526) $(55,385) $(129,298) $13,821
 $(210,388)
Net income (loss) per share:         
Basic$(0.10) $(0.15) $(0.34) $0.04
 $(0.55)
Diluted$(0.10) $(0.15) $(0.34) $0.04
 $(0.55)
Number of shares used in calculation:         
Basic379,544
 379,781
 380,025
 380,149
 379,877
Effect of dilutive securities
 
 
 1,112
 
Diluted379,544
 379,781
 380,025
 381,261
 379,877
(a)
Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes includes land-related charges of $0.7 million, $6.8 million, $3.9 million, and $24.4 million in the 1st Quarter, 2nd Quarter, 3rd Quarter, and 4th Quarter, respectively; goodwill impairment charges totaling $240.5 million in the 3rd Quarter; and losses on debt retirements of $3.5 million and $2.1 million in the 2nd Quarter and 4th Quarter, respectively.
(b)
Financial Services income (loss) before income taxes includes additional loan origination reserves of $19.3 million and $40.0 million in the 2nd Quarter and 4th Quarter, respectively.
(c)Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. Additionally, quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.

(b)
Homebuilding income before income taxes includes reserve reversals resulting from a legal settlement (see Note 12)of $26.9 million and $5.7 million in the 2nd and 3rd Quarters, respectively; a charge of $20.0 million in the 3rd Quarter related to the Applecross matter (see Note 12); and $29.6 million relating to decreased general liability insurance reserves in the 4th Quarter.

(c)Financial Services expenses in the 4th Quarter includes a reduction in loan origination liabilities totaling $11.8 million..

83


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
 1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (a)
2014         
Homebuilding:         
Revenues$1,093,999
 $1,254,989
 $1,561,273
 $1,786,464
 $5,696,725
Cost of revenues833,614
 959,524
 1,198,908
 1,374,951
 4,366,997
Income before income taxes (b)
108,435
 58,573
 214,051
 254,118
 635,177
Financial Services:         
Revenues$24,895
 $31,198
 $33,452
 $36,093
 $125,638
Income before income taxes (c)
21,594
 9,108
 10,877
 13,002
 54,581
Consolidated results:         
Revenues$1,118,894
 $1,286,187
 $1,594,725
 $1,822,557
 $5,822,363
Income before income taxes130,029
 67,681
 224,928
 267,120
 689,758
Income tax expense (benefit) (d)
55,210
 25,801
 84,383
 50,025
 215,420
Net income$74,819
 $41,880
 $140,545
 $217,095
 $474,338
Net income per share:         
Basic$0.19
 $0.11
 $0.37
 $0.58
 $1.27
Diluted$0.19
 $0.11
 $0.37
 $0.58
 $1.26
Number of shares used in calculation:         
Basic383,991
 376,072
 373,531
 369,533
 370,377
Effect of dilutive securities3,815
 3,592
 3,761
 3,734
 3,725
Diluted387,806
 379,664
 377,292
 373,267
 374,102
(a)Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. Additionally, quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.

(a)
Homebuilding income before income taxes includes losses on debt retirement of $8.6 millionin the 1st Quarter; charges of $84.5 million to increase general liability insurance reserves in the 2nd Quarter; and costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters of $8.7 million, offset by favorable adjustments of $15.2 million to decrease general liability insurance reserves in the 4th Quarter.

(b)Financial Services expenses in the 1st Quarter includes a reduction in loan origination liabilities totaling $18.6 million.

(c)Income tax expense in the 4th Quarter includes a benefit of $49.6 million related to the resolution of certain tax matters and the reversal of valuation allowance related to certain state deferred tax assets.



9384



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of PulteGroup, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PulteGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PulteGroup, Inc. at December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), PulteGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated February 6, 20138, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, MichiganAtlanta, Georgia
February 6, 20138, 2016


9485



ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTDISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURESDISCLOSURE

This Item is not applicable.

ITEM 9A.      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20122015. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 20122015.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

(a)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with United StatesU.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgments and estimates concerning events and transactions that are accounted for or disclosed.

Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control and effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Additionally, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.

In order to ensure that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, management regularly assesses such controls and did so most recently for its financial reporting as of December 31, 20122015. Management’s assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management asserts that the Company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122015.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, has issued its report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122015.

9586



(b)Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of PulteGroup, Inc.

We have audited PulteGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). PulteGroup, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, PulteGroup, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of PulteGroup, Inc. as of December 31, 20122015 and 20112014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122015 and our report dated February 6, 20138, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Detroit, Michigan/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 6, 20138, 2016


(c)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20122015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.      OTHER INFORMATION

This Item is not applicable.


9687



PART III

ITEM 10.      DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this Item with respect to our executive officers is set forth in Item 4A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information required by this Item with respect to members of our Board of Directors and with respect to our audit committee will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“20132016 Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Committees of the Board of Directors - Audit Committee” and in the chart disclosing Audit Committee membership and is incorporated herein by this reference. Information required by this Item with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be contained in the 20132016 Proxy Statement under the caption “Beneficial Security Ownership - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and is incorporated herein by this reference. Information required by this Item with respect to our code of ethics will be contained in the 20132016 Proxy Statement under the caption “Corporate Governance - Governance Guidelines; Code of Ethical Business Conduct; Code of Ethics” and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Our code of ethics for principal officers, our code of ethical business conduct, our corporate governance guidelines, and the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Governance, and Finance and Investment committees of our Board of Directors are also posted on our website and are available in print, free of charge, upon request.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20132016 Proxy Statement under the captions “20122015 Executive Compensation” and “20122015 Director Compensation” and is incorporated herein by this reference, provided that the Compensation and Management Development Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “filed” with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLER MATTERS

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20132016 Proxy Statement under the captions “Beneficial Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20132016 Proxy Statement under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Election of Directors - Independence” and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20132016 Proxy Statement under the captions “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” and “Audit Committee Preapproval Policies” and is incorporated herein by reference.

9788



PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 (a)
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1)    Financial Statements
 
(2)Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted because the required information is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibit Number and Description
(2)(a)Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2015, by and among JW Homes, LLC, JW Land
Investment, LLC and PulteGroup, Inc (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2015)
(3) (a) Restated Articles of Incorporation, of PulteGroup, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 18, 2009)
     
  (b) Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated March 18, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
     
  (c) Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated May 21, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010)
     
  (d) By-laws, as amended, of PulteGroup, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 8, 2009)
     
  (e) Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares, dated August 6, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed with the SEC on August 18, 2009)
     
(4) (a) Any instrument with respect to long-term debt, where the securities authorized thereunder do not exceed 10% of the total assets of PulteGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries, has not been filed. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the SEC upon request.
     
  (b) Amended and Restated Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2010, between PulteGroup, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent, which includes the Form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of PulteGroup, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the SEC on March 23, 2010)
     
(10) (a)(c) 1995 Stock Incentive Plan for Key EmployeesFirst Amendment to Amended and Restated Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2013, between PulteGroup, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement dated March 31, 1995, and as Exhibit 4.14-1 of our Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-8, Registration No. 33-99218)8-K, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2013)
     
(10) (b)(a) PulteGroup, Inc. 401(k) Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-115570)
(c)Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated October 1, 2003, among Asset Seven Corp., Pulte Realty Corporation, certain subsidiaries of PulteGroup, Inc., Bank One, NA, as Administrative Agent, and Bank One Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003)

9889



     
  (d)Facility Agreement dated as of June 23, 2009 among PulteGroup, Inc., Various Financial Institutions, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 26, 2009)
(e)PulteGroup, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-66284)
(f)PulteGroup, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-66284)
(g)(b) PulteGroup, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement dated April 3, 2002 and as Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-123223)
     
  (h)(c) PulteGroup, Inc. 2008 Senior Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement dated April 7, 2008)
     
  (i)(d)PulteGroup, Inc. 2013 Senior Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2013)
(e) PulteGroup, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (j)(f) Form of PulteGroup, Inc. Long Term Incentive Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (k)(g) Form of PulteGroup, Inc. 2008-2010 Grant Acceptance Agreement - Company Performance Measures (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (l)(h) Form of PulteGroup, Inc. 2008-2010 Grant Acceptance Agreement - Individual Performance Measures (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (m)(i)PulteGroup, Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2013)
(j) PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of July 9, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009)
     
  (n)(k)Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014)
(l) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
     
  (o)(m)Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(p) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013)
(n) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees ( Incorporated(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
     
  (p)(o) Form of Stock Option Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2002 and 2004 Stock Incentive Plans (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)
     
  (q)(p) Form of Stock Option Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2002 and 2004 Stock Incentive Plans (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(t) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)
     
  (r)(q) Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 )
     
  (s)Centex Corporation Amended and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009)
(t)Amended and Restated Centex Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009)
(u)Form of stock option agreement for the Amended and Restated Centex Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2008)
(v)Centex Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009)

99



(w)Form of stock option agreement for the Centex Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2008)
(x)(r)  PulteGroup, Inc. Long Term Compensation Deferral Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006)
     
  (y)(s)  PulteGroup, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (as Amended and Restated Effective December 8, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(al) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009)
     
  (z)(t)  Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of August 18, 2009 between PulteGroup, Inc. and Centex Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 20, 2009)
     

90



  (aa)(u)  Form of Performance Award Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2008 Senior Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)
     
  (ab)(v) Clarification of Offer Letter to Deborah Meyer dated as of April 26, 2011PulteGroup, Inc. Executive Severance Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)10.1 of our QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for8-K, filed with the quarter ended March 31, 2011)SEC on February 12, 2013)
     
  (ac)(w)  Offer Letter dated as of May 9, 2011, between PulteGroup, Inc. and Robert T. O'ShaughnessyAmended Retirement Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K filed with10-Q for the SEC on May 9, 2011)quarter ended June 30, 2015)
     
  (ad)(x) Credit Agreement dated as of July 23, 2014 among PulteGroup, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America,
N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and an L/C Issuer, and the Other Lenders Party
Hereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2014)
(y)Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2015, among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders listed therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 5, 2015)
(z)Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of September 28, 20124, 2015, among Comerica Bank, as Agent, Lead Arranger and a Buyer, the other Buyers party hereto and Pulte Mortgage LLC, as Seller (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 2, 2012)September 8, 2015
     
  (ae)(aa) SeparationFirst Amendment to Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of November 30, 2012, between PulteGroup, Inc.December 10, 2015 among Comerica Bank, as Agent and John B. Bertero IIIa Buyer, the other Buyers party thereto and Pulte Mortgage LLC, as Seller (Incorporated by referencedreference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2012)
14, 2015)
     
(12)   Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges at December 31, 20122015 (Filed herewith)
     
(21)   Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Filed herewith)
     
(23)   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith)
(24)Power of Attorney (filed herewith)
     
(31) (a) Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Richard J. Dugas, Jr., Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer (Filed herewith)
     
  (b) Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Robert T. O'Shaughnessy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Filed herewith)
     
(32)   Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Filed herewith)
     
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document
     
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
     
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
     
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
     
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
     
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

10091



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PULTEGROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
 
February 6, 20138, 2016By:  /s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
   Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
   Executive Vice President
   and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capabilitiescapacities and on the datesdate indicated:
 
SignatureFebruary 8, 2016 Title Date
    
/s/ Richard J. Dugas, Jr./s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy/s/ James L. Ossowski
Richard J. Dugas, Jr.Robert T. O'ShaughnessyJames L. Ossowski
 
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 February 6, 2013Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Vice President, Finance and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Richard J. Dugas, Jr.
   
    
/s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Brian P. Anderson February 6, 2013
Robert T. O'ShaughnessyMember of Board of Directors}  
    
/s/ Michael J. Schweninger 
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Bryce Blair February 6, 2013
Michael J. SchweningerMember of Board of Directors}  
    
/s/ Brian P. AndersonRichard W. Dreiling Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
Brian P. Anderson}  
    
/s/ Bryce BlairThomas J. Folliard Member of Board of Directors}February 6, 2013/s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
Bryce Blair 
Cheryl W. GriséMember of Board of Directors}Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
James GrosfeldMember of Board of Directors}Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
André J. HawauxMember of Board of Directors}  
    
/s/ ThomasDebra J. FolliardKelly-Ennis Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
Thomas J. Folliard}  
    
/s/ Cheryl W. GriséPatrick J. O’Leary Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
Cheryl W. Grisé}  
    
/s/ DebraJames J. Kelly-EnnisPostl Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
Debra J. Kelly-Ennis}  
    
/s/ David N. McCammon Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
David N. McCammon
/s/ Patrick J. O’LearyMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
Patrick J. O’Leary
/s/ James J. PostlMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
James J. Postl
/s/ Bernard W. ReznicekMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 6, 2013
Bernard W. Reznicek   


10192