Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
   
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ý    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122014
OR
¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                                         to                                         
Commission file number 1-9876
Weingarten Realty Investors
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS74-1464203
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2600 Citadel Plaza Drive 
P.O. Box 924133 
Houston, Texas77292-4133
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(713) 866-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.03 par value New York Stock Exchange
Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, $0.03 par valueNew York Stock Exchange
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, $0.03 par valueNew York Stock Exchange
8.1% Notes due 2019 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   
YES   ý            NO   ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  
YES   ¨            NO   ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.            YES  ý     NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 
YES   ý            NO   ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.            ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  ý
Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer  ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES   ¨            NO   ý
The aggregate market value of the common shares of beneficial interest held by non-affiliates on June 30, 20122014 (based upon the most recent closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange as of such date of $26.3432.84) was $2,928,767,669.$3.7 billion.
As of January 31, 20132015, there were 121,510,267122,505,338 common shares of beneficial interest outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 30, 201328, 2015 have been incorporated by reference to Part III of this Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Item No. 
Page
No.
 
Page
No.
  
  
  
1.
1A.
1B.
2.
3.
4.
  
  
  
5.
6.
7.
7A.
8.
9.
9A.
9B.
  
  
  
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
  
  
  
15.
  


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report on Form 10-K, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, (i) disruptions in financial markets, (ii) general economic and local real estate conditions, (iii) the inability of major tenants to continue paying their rent obligations due to bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in their business, (iv) financing risks, such as the inability to obtain equity, debt, or other sources of financing on favorable terms, (v) changes in governmental laws and regulations, (vi) the level and volatility of interest rates, (vii) the availability of suitable acquisition opportunities, (viii) the ability to dispose properties, (ix) changes in expected development activity, (x) increases in operating costs, (xi) tax matters, including failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust, and (xii) investments through real estate joint ventures and partnerships, which involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole investor. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations will be realized. For further discussion of the factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements and our future results and financial condition, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

PART I

ITEM 1. Business
General Development of Business.    Weingarten Realty Investors is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) organized under the Texas Business Organizations Code. We, and our predecessor entity, began the ownership and development of shopping centers and other commercial real estate in 1948. Our primary business is leasing space to tenants in the shopping centers we own or lease. We also provide property management services for bothwhich we charge fees to either joint ventures in whichwhere we are partners and foror other outside owners for which we charge fees.owners.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, for information on certain recent developments of the Company.
Financial Information about Segments.    We are in the business of owning, managing and developing retail shopping centers. As each of our centers has similar characteristics and amenities, our operations have been aggregated into one reportable segment. See the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding reportable segments.
Narrative Description of Business.    At December 31, 20122014, we owned or operated under long-term leases, either directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, a total of 292234 developed income-producing properties and twothree properties under various stages of construction and development. The total number of centers includes 288 neighborhood and community shopping centers and six other operating propertiesdevelopment, which are located in 21 states spanning the country from coast to coast. The portfolio of properties contains approximately 53.745.3 million square feet of gross leasable area that is either owned by us or others.
We also owned interests in 3834 parcels of land held for development that totaled approximately 27.525.3 million square feet.
At December 31, 20122014, we employed 345315 full-time persons; our principal executive offices are located at 2600 Citadel Plaza Drive, Houston, Texas 77008; and our phone number is (713) 866-6000. We also have 10 regional offices located in various parts of the United States (“U.S.”).

Financial Information about Segments.    We are in the business
1

Table of owning, managing and developing retail shopping centers. To a lesser extent, we own and manage other operating properties. See the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our reportable segments.Contents

Investment and Operating Strategy.    Our goal is to remain a leader in owning and operating top tiertop-tier neighborhood and community shopping centers in certain markets of the U.S. We expect to achieve this goal by strategically focusingby:
strategic focus on core operating fundamentals through continuing our hands-ondecentralized operating platform built on local expertise in leasing and management, property management;
selective redevelopment of the existing portfolio of properties in order to enhance and maintain high quality centers;
disciplined growth from strategic acquisitions and new developments, and developments;
disposition of assets that no longer meet our ownership criteria. We remain committedcriteria, in which proceeds may be recycled by repaying debt, purchasing new assets or reinvesting in currently owned assets or for other corporate purposes; and
commitment to maintaining a conservatively leveraged balance sheet, a well-staggered debt maturity schedule and strong credit agency ratings.

1

Table of Contents

We are continuing with a capital recycling plan that was announced in 2011, which has provided capital for growth opportunities and strengthened our operating fundamentals. During 2012, we successfully disposed of $706.3 million of real estate assets, both directly or through our interests in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, which includes the disposition of our industrial portfolio. This recycling program is ongoing, and we expect to complete dispositions in the range of $200 million to $300 million in 2013. By exiting the industrial real estate market, we have successfully accomplished our goal of positioning ourselves as a REIT dedicated to the retail real estate market. Also upon the completion of this plan, we believe our remaining portfolio of shopping centers will be among the strongest in our sector.
The proceeds generated by these dispositions were used to fund acquisitions and new development expenditures and to reduce outstanding debt, further deleveraging our balance sheet. We will continue to actively seek acquisitions and new development opportunities to grow our operations. Despite the substantial competition for quality acquisition opportunities, we have been able to close on $232.3 million during 2012. We will continue to identify select properties that meet our return hurdles and will actively evaluate other opportunities as they enter the market. For 2013, we expect to invest in acquisitions and new developments in a range similar to our dispositions of $200 million to $300 million.
We may either purchase or lease income-producing properties in the future, and may also participate with other entities in property ownership through partnerships, joint ventures or similar types of co-ownership. Equity investments may be subject to existing mortgage financing and other indebtedness or such financing may be incurred in connection with acquiring such investments.
We may invest in mortgages; however, we have traditionally invested in first mortgages to real estate joint ventures or partnerships in which we own an equity interest or to obtain control over a real estate asset that we desire to own. We may also invest in securities of other issuers for the purpose, among others, of exercising control over such entities, subject to the gross income and asset tests necessary for REIT qualification.
In acquiring and developing properties, we attempt to accumulate enough properties in a geographic area to allow for the establishment of a regional office, which enables us to obtain in-depth knowledge of the market from a leasing perspective and to have easy access to the property and our tenants from a management viewpoint.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, neighborhood and community shopping centers generated 98.3% of our total revenue as we have been exiting from the industrial real estate market. We expect to continue our focus on the future growth of the portfolio in neighborhood and community shopping centers in markets where we currently operate and may expand to other markets throughout the U.S. Our markets of interest reflect high income and job growth, as well as high barriers-to-entry. Our attention is also focused on high quality, supermarket-anchored and necessity-based centers.
Diversification from both a geographic and tenancy perspective is a critical component of our operating strategy. We continue to seek opportunities outside the Texas market, andwhere approximately 28.1%27.8% of the building square footagegross leasable area of our properties is located, in Texas, down from 32.7%28.2% in 2011.2013. With respect to tenant diversification, our two largest tenants, The Kroger Co. and TJX Companies, Inc., accounted for 3.2%3.5% and 2.1%2.3%, respectively, of our total base minimum rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 20122014. No other tenant accounted for more than 1.9%1.8% of our total base minimum rental revenues. Our anchor tenants are supermarkets, value-oriented apparel/discount stores and other retailers or service providers who generally sell basic necessity-type goods and services. Through this challenging economic environment, weWe believe the stability of our anchor tenants, combined with convenient locations, attractive and well-maintained properties, high quality retailers and a strong tenant mix, should ensure the long-term success of our merchants and the viability of our portfolio.
WeStrategically, we strive to finance our growth and working capital needs in a conservative manner.manner, including managing our debt maturities. Our senior debt credit ratings were BBB with a projected stable outlook from Standard & Poors and Baa2 with a projected positive outlook from Moody’s Investor Services as of December 31, 2012 and 20112014. We intend to maintain a conservative approach to managing our balance sheet, which, in turn, givesshould give us many options for raising debt or equity capital when needed. At December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, our ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), not based on funds from operations, was 1.273.09 to 1 and .751.72 to 1, respectively. We have also seen an improvement in ourOur debt to total assets before depreciation ratio which was 42.2%40.0% and 44.7%43.5% at December 31, 20122014 and 2011, respsectively.2013, respectively.
Our policies with respect to the investment and operating strategies discussed above are periodically reviewed by our Board of Trust Managers and may be modified without a vote of our shareholders.

2

Table of Contents

Location of Properties.    Our properties are located in 21 states, primarily throughout the southern half of the country. As of December 31, 20122014, we have 294237 properties which(including three properties under development) that were owned or operated under long-term leases, either directly or through our interestsinterest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships. NetTotal revenues less operating expenses and real estate taxes from continuing operations ("net operating income from continuing operationsoperations") generated by our properties located in Houston and its surrounding areas was 21.1%19.7% of total net operating income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, and an additional 7.7%9.8% of net operating income from continuing operations iswas generated in 2014 from properties that are located in other parts of Texas. WeAs of December 31, 2014, we also havehad 3834 parcels of land held for development, 10eight of which arewere located in Houston and its surrounding areas and 1012 of which arewere located in other parts of Texas. Because of our investments in Houston and its surrounding areas, as well as in other parts of Texas, the Houston and Texas economies affect, to a large degree, our business and operations.
Economic Factors.    While downside risks still exist, most economic indicators suggest that the economic recovery is continuing to strengthen. Consumer confidence continues to rebound from historical low levels, credit availability is improving, and retail sales and the housing market showed growth through 2012. Sales will likely continue to trend upward though at a decreased rate, causing year over year comparisons to be more difficult. Overall, we expect improvement in gross sales to translate into a continued demand for retail space which should lead to slightly lower vacancy rates and more stable rents beyond 2013. With the majority of our shopping centers being supermarket-anchored and located in densely populated major metropolitan areas, our portfolio continues to out perform centers anchored by tenants with more discretionary product lines in the current economy.
Our market analysis has continued to identify stronger interest for top tier shopping centers where easier availability for credit has resulted in higher prices. Second and third tier properties have continued to see pricing constraints. In light of these trends, we have continued to dedicate internal resources to evaluate available assets in our key markets and to identify and purchase the best assets and properties with the strongest upside potential.
Competition.    We compete with numerous other developers and real estate companies (both public and private), financial institutions and other investors engaged in the development, acquisition and operation of shopping centers in our trade areas. This results in competition for the acquisition of both existing income-producing properties and prime development sites. Competition for these acquisitions may also increase as credit availability improves resulting in additional pricing pressure.
We also compete for tenants to occupy the space that is developed, acquired and managed by our competitors or us.competitors. The principal competitive factors in attracting tenants in our market areas are location, price, anchor tenants and maintenance of properties. We believe our key competitive advantages include the favorable locations of our properties, the strong demographics surrounding our centers, knowledge of markets and customer bases, our ability to provide a retailer with multiple locations with quality anchor tenants and the practice of continuous maintenance and renovation of our properties.
Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust.    As of December 31, 2014, we met the qualification requirements of a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. As a result, we will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent we meet certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, with the exception of our taxable REIT subsidiary.
Materials Available on Our Website.    Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as well as Reports on Forms 3, 4, 5 and SC 13G regarding our officers, trust managers or 10% beneficial owners, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website (www.weingarten.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. We have also made available on our website copies of our Audit Committee Charter, Management Development and Executive Compensation Committee Charter, Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, Code of Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethical Conduct for Officers and Senior Financial Associates and Governance Guidelines.Policies. In the event of any changes to these charters, codes or the code or guidelines,policies, changed copies will also be made available on our website. You may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 or the SEC’s Internet site at www.sec.gov. Materials on our website are not part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Financial Information.    Additional financial information concerning us is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements located in Item 8 herein.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The risks described below could materially and adversely affect our shareholders and our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows. In addition to these risks, our operations may also be affected by additional factors not presently known or that we currently consider immaterial to our operations.

3

Table of Contents

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our liquidity and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our common shares of beneficial interest.
The U.S. and global equity and credit markets have experienced and may in the future experience significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which could cause market prices of many stocks to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances could materially impact liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive, and in certain cases result in the unavailability of certain types of financing. Uncertainties in the equity and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms or at all, which may negatively affect our ability to complete dispositions, form joint ventures or refinance our debt. A prolonged downturn in the equity or credit markets could cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for us to sell properties or adversely affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties in obtaining financing. These events in the equity and credit markets may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of our common shares of beneficial interest (“common shares”) or preferred shares. These disruptions in the financial markets also may have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common shares and preferred shares and other adverse effects on us or the economy generally. There can be no assurances that government responses to the disruptions in the financial markets will continue to restore consumer confidence, stabilize themaintain stabilized markets or increase liquidity andcontinue to provide the availability of equity or credit financing.
Among the market conditions that may affect the value of our common shares and preferred shares and access to the capital markets are the following:
The attractiveness of REIT securities as compared to other securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, fixed income equity securities and debt securities;
Changes in revenues or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other REITs;
The degree of interest held by institutional investors;
The market's perception of the quality of our assets and our growth potential;
The ability of our tenants to pay rent to us and meet their other obligations to us under current lease terms;
Our ability to re-lease space as leases expire;
Our ability to refinance our indebtedness as it matures;
Actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
Any changes in our distribution policy;
Any future issuances of equity securities;
Strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
General market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the real estate industry; and
Domestic and international economic and political factors unrelated to our performance.
The volatility in the stock market can create price and volume fluctuations that may not necessarily be comparable to operating performance.
The economic performance and value of our shopping centers depend on many factors, each of which could have an adverse impact on our cash flows and operating results.
The economic performance and value of our properties can be affected by many factors, including the following:
Changes in the national, regional and local economic climate;
Changes in environmental regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, legislation on global warming;
Local conditions such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area;
The attractiveness of the properties to tenants;

4

Table of Contents

Competition from other available space;
Competition for our tenants from Internet sales;
Our ability to provide adequate management services and to maintain our properties;
Increased operating costs, if these costs cannot be passed through to tenants;
The cost of periodically renovating, repairing and releasing spaces;
The consequences of any armed conflict involving, or terrorist attack against, the U.S.;
Our ability to secure adequate insurance;
Fluctuations in interest rates;
Changes in real estate taxes and other expenses; and
Availability of financing on acceptable terms or at all.
Our properties consist primarily of neighborhood and community shopping centers and, therefore, our performance is linked to general economic conditions in the market for retail space. The market for retail space has been and may continue tocould in the future be adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies where our properties are located, the adverse financial condition of some large retail companies, the ongoing consolidation in the retail sector, the excess amount of retail space in a number of markets and increasing consumer purchases through catalogs and the Internet. To the extent that any of these conditions occur,exist, they are likely to affect market rents for retail space. In addition, we may face challenges in the management and maintenance of the properties or encounter increased operating costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, which may make our properties unattractive to tenants. A significant decrease in rental revenue and an inability to replace such revenues may adversely affect our profitability, the ability to meet debt and other financial obligations and make distributions to shareholders.
We have a high concentration of properties in the state of Texas, and adverse economic or other conditions in that area could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are particularly susceptible to adverse economic or other conditions in the state of Texas, including increased unemployment, industry slowdowns, including declining oil prices, business layoffs or downsizing, decreases in consumer confidence, relocations of businesses, changes in demographics, increases in real estate and other taxes, increases in regulations and natural disasters, any of which could have an increased material adverse effect on us than if our portfolio was more geographically diverse.
Our acquisition activities may not produce the cash flows that we expect and may be limited by competitive pressures or other factors.
We intend to acquire existing commercial properties to the extent that suitable acquisitions can be made on advantageous terms. Acquisitions of commercial properties involve risks such as:
We may have difficulty identifying acquisition opportunities that fit our investment strategy;
Our estimates on expected occupancy and rental rates may differ from actual conditions;
Our estimates of the costs of any redevelopment or repositioning of acquired properties may prove to be inaccurate;
We may be unable to operate successfully in new markets where acquired properties are located, due to a lack of market knowledge or understanding of local economies;
We may be unable to successfully integrate new properties into our existing operations; or
We may have difficulty obtaining financing on acceptable terms or paying the operating expenses and debt service associated with acquired properties prior to sufficient occupancy.
In addition, we may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment. Our inability to successfully acquire new properties may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

5

Table of Contents

Turmoil in capital markets could adversely impact acquisition activities and pricing of real estate assets.
Volatility in the capital markets could impact the availability of debt financing due to numerous factors, including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the significant inventory of unsold collateralized mortgage-backed securities in the market.agencies. These factors directly affect a lender’s ability to provide debt financing as well as increase the cost of available debt financing. As a result, we may not be able to obtain favorable debt financing in the futureon favorable terms or at all. This may result in future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns, which may adversely affect our results of operations and distributions to shareholders. Furthermore, any turmoil in the capital markets could adversely impact the overall amount of capital available to invest in real estate, which may result in price or value decreases of real estate assets.

5

Table of Contents

Our real estate assets may be subject to impairment charges.
Periodically, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our real estate assets, including any capitalized costs and any identifiable intangible assets, may be impaired. A property's value is impaired only if the estimate of the aggregate future undiscounted cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges)charges to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. In estimating cash flows, we consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If we are evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows consider the most likely course of action at the balance sheet date based on current plans, intended holding periods and available market information. Determining whether a property is impaired and, if impaired, the amount of write-down to fair value requires a significant amount of judgment by management and is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation. If market conditions deteriorate or management’s plans for certain properties change, additional write-downs could be required in the future, and any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the charge is taken.
Reduction of rental income would adversely affect our profitability, our ability to meet our debt obligations and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
The substantial majority of our income is derived from rental income from real property. As a result, our performance depends on our ability to collect rent from tenants. Our income and funds for distribution would be negatively affected if a significant number of our tenants, or any of our major tenants (as discussed in more detail below):
Delay lease commencements;
Decline to extend or renew leases upon expiration;
Fail to make rental payments when due; or
Close stores or declare bankruptcy.
Any of these actions could result in the termination of the tenants’ lease and the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated leases. In addition, lease terminations by an anchor tenant or a failure by that anchor tenant to occupy the premises could also result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants in the same shopping centerscenter under the terms of some leases. In these events, we cannot be sure that any tenant whose lease expires will renew that lease or that we will be able to re-lease space on economically advantageous terms. Furthermore, certain costs remain fixed even though a property may not be fully occupied. The loss of rental revenues from a number of our tenants and our inability to replace such tenants, particularly in the case of a substantial tenant with leases in multiple locations, may adversely affect our profitability, our ability to meet debt and other financial obligations and our ability to make distributions to the shareholders.
Adverse effects on the success and stability of our anchor tenants, could lead to reductions of rental income.
Our rental income could be adversely affected in the event of a downturn in the business, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of any anchor store or anchor tenant. Anchor tenants generally occupy large amounts of square footage, pay a significant portion of the total rents at a property and contribute to the success of other tenants by drawing significant numbers of customers to a property. The closing of one or more anchor stores at a property could adversely affect that property and result in lease terminations or reductions in rent from other tenants, whose leases may permit termination or rent reduction in those circumstances or whose own operations may suffer as a result. Furthermore, tenant demand for certain of our anchor spaces may decrease, and as a result, we may see an increase in vacancy and/or a decrease in rents for those spaces, which could have a negative impact to our rental income.

6

Table of Contents

We face significant competition in the leasing market, which may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.
We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of retail properties, many of which own properties similar to, and in the same market sectors as, our properties. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates, or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants, or we may be forced to reduce rental rates in order to attract new tenants and retain existing tenants when their leases expire.
Also, if our competitors develop additional retail properties in locations near our properties, there may be increased competition for customer traffic and creditworthinesscreditworthy tenants, which may result in fewer tenants or decreased cash flows from tenants, or both, and may require us to make capital improvements to properties that we would not have otherwise made. Our tenants also face increasing competition from other forms of marketing of goods, such as direct mail and Internet marketing, which may decrease cash flow from such tenants. As a result, our financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected.
We may be unable to collect balances due from tenants in bankruptcy.
A tenant that files for bankruptcy protection may not continue to pay us rent. A bankruptcy filing by or relating to one of our tenants or a lease guarantor would bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from the tenant or the lease guarantor, or their property, unless the bankruptcy court permits us to do so. A tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy could delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases and could ultimately preclude collection of these sums. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim for damages. As a result, it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims it holds, if at all.

6

Table of Contents

Our development and construction activities could adversely affect our operating results.
We intend to continue the selective development and construction of retail properties in accordance with our development and underwriting policies as opportunities arise. Our development and construction activities include risks that:
We may abandon development opportunities after expending resources to determine feasibility;
Construction costs of a project may exceed our original estimates;
Occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable;
Rental rates could be less than projected;
Project completion may be delayed because of a number of factors, including weather, labor disruptions, construction delays or delays in receipt of zoning or other regulatory approvals, adverse economic conditions, acts of terror or other acts of violence, or acts of God (such as fires, earthquakes or floods);
Financing may not be available to us on favorable terms for development of a property; and
We may not complete construction and lease-up on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs; and
We may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations.costs.
Additionally, the time frame required for development, construction and lease-up of these properties means that we may have to wait years for a significant cash return. If any of the above events occur, the development of properties may hinder our growth and have an adverse effect on our results of operations, including additional impairment charges. In addition,Also, new development activities, regardless of whether or not they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management.
There is a lack of operating history with respect to any recent acquisitions and development of properties, and we may not succeed in the integration or management of additional properties.
These properties may have characteristics or deficiencies currently unknown to us that affect their value or revenue potential. It is also possible that the operating performance of these properties may decline under our management. As we acquire additional properties, we will be subject to risks associated with managing new properties, including lease-up and tenant retention. In addition, our ability to manage our growth effectively will require us to successfully integrate any new acquisitions into our existing management structure. We may not succeed with this integration or effectively manage additional properties. Also, newly acquired properties may not perform as expected.

7

Table of Contents

Real estate property investments are illiquid, and therefore, we may not be able to dispose of properties when desirable or on favorable terms.
Real estate property investments generally cannot be disposed of quickly. In addition, the Internal Revenue Code imposes restrictions on the ability of a REIT to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties, and we cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. Therefore, we may not be able to quickly vary our portfolio in response to economic or other conditions promptly or on favorable terms, which could cause us to incur extended losses and reduce our cash flows and adversely affect distributions to shareholders.
We have a high concentrationAs part of our capital recycling program, we intend to sell our non-core assets and may not be able to recover our investments, which may result in losses to us.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to recover the current carrying amount of all of our owned and partially owned non-core properties and investments in the state of Texas, and adverse economic and other developments in that area could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are particularly susceptiblefuture. Our failure to adverse economic and other developmentsdo so would require us to recognize impairment charges in the state of Texas, including increased unemployment, industry slowdowns, business layoffs or downsizing, decrease consumer confidence, relocations of businesses, changesperiod in demographics, increases in real estate and other taxes, increase regulations and natural disasters, any ofwhich we reached that conclusion, which could have a material adverse effect on us.adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

7

Table of Contents

Our cash flows and operating results could be adversely affected by required payments of debt or related interest and other risks of our debt financing.
We are generally subject to risks associated with debt financing. These risks include:
Our cash flow may not satisfy required payments of principal and interest;
We may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness on our properties as necessary or the terms of the refinancing may be less favorable to us than the terms of existing debt;
Required debt payments are not reduced if the economic performance of any property declines;
Debt service obligations could reduce funds available for distribution to our shareholders and funds available for capital investment;
Any default on our indebtedness could result in acceleration of those obligations and possible loss of property to foreclosure; and
The risk that necessary capital expenditures for purposes such as re-leasing space cannot be financed on favorable terms.
If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we cannot make the mortgage payments, we may have to surrender the property to the lender with a consequent loss of any prospective income and equity value from such property. Any of these risks can place strains on our cash flows, reduce our ability to grow and adversely affect our results of operations.
Credit ratings may not reflect all the risks of an investment in our debt or preferred shares and rating changes could adversely effect our revolving credit facility.
Our credit ratings are an assessment by rating agencies of our ability to pay our debts and preferred dividends when due. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our debt and preferred shares. Credit ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency inat its sole discretion. Additionally, our revolving credit facility fees are based on our credit ratings. We do not undertake any obligation to maintain the ratings or to advise holders of our debt or preferred shares of any change in ratings. Each agency's rating should be evaluated independently of any other agency's rating.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings. Adverse changes in our credit ratings could impair our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, and could significantly reduce the market price of our publicly tradedpublicly-traded securities.

8

Table of Contents

Rising interest rates could adversely affect our cash flows and adversely affect the market price of our debt and preferred shares.
We have indebtedness with interest rates that vary depending on market indices. Also, our credit facilities bear interest at variable rates. We may incur variable-rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates on variable-rate debt would increase our interest expense, which would negatively affect net income and cash available for payment of our debt obligations and distributions to shareholders. In addition, an increase in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of our outstanding debt and preferred shares, as well as increase the cost of refinancing and the issuance of new debt or securities.
Our financial condition could be adversely affected by financial covenants.
Our credit facilities and public debt indentures under which our indebtedness is, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, certain coverage ratios, as well as limitations on our ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, restrictions on our ability to sell all or substantially all of our assets and engage in mergers and consolidations and certain acquisitions. These covenants could limit our ability to obtain additional funds needed to address cash shortfalls or pursue growth opportunities or transactions that would provide substantial return to our shareholders. In addition, a breach of these covenants could cause a default under or accelerate some or all of our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

8

Table of Contents

Property ownership through real estate partnerships and joint ventures could limit our control of those investments and reduce our expected return.
Real estate partnership or joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by us, including the possibility that our partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt, that our partner or co-venturer might at any time have different interests or goals than us, and that our partner or co-venturer may take action contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives. Other risks of joint venture investments could include impasse on decisions, such as a sale or refinance, because neither our partner or co-venturer nor we would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. These factors could limit the return that we receive from those investments or cause our cash flows to be lower than our estimates.
Volatility in market and economic conditions may impact our partners’ ability to perform in accordance with our real estate joint venture and partnership agreements resulting in a change in control or the liquidation plans of its underlying properties.
Changes in control of our investments could result if any reconsideration events occur, such as amendments to our real estate joint venture and partnership agreements, changes in debt guarantees or changes in ownership due to required capital contributions, occur.contributions. Any changes in control will result in the revaluation of our investments to fair value, which could lead to an impairment. We are unable to predict whether, or to what extent, a change in control may result or the impact of adverse market and economic conditions may have to our partners.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could have significant tax liability.
We intend to operate in a manner that allows us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, REIT qualification requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual or quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, for which there are a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations. Our status as a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. Accordingly, it is not certain we will be able to qualify and remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Even a technical or inadvertent violation of the REIT requirements could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Furthermore, Congress or the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) might change the tax laws or regulations and the courts might issue new rulings, in each case potentially having retroactive effect that could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:
We would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation, which, among other things, means that we would be unable to deduct distributions to our shareholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;
Any resulting tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to shareholders, and could force us to liquidate assets or take other actions that could have a detrimental effect on our operating results; and

9

Table of Contents

Unless we were entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost our qualification, and our cash available for distribution to our shareholders would, therefore, be reduced for each of the years in which we do not qualify as a REIT.
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow. We may also be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and property either directly or at the level of our subsidiaries. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
Compliance with REIT requirements may negatively affect our operating decisions.
To maintain our status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must meet certain requirements, on an ongoing basis, including requirements regarding our sources of income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our shareholders and the ownership of our common shares. We may also be required to make distributions to our shareholders when we do not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when our funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures.expenditures or debt service obligations.

9

Table of Contents

As a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual net taxable income (excluding net capital gains) to our shareholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes, or our net taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to our shareholders. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds, sell a portion of our securities at unfavorable prices or find other sources of funds in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements.
Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.
Effective January 1, 2013,In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for qualified dividends paid to individual U.S. shareholders is 20%. Unlike dividends received from a corporation that is not a REIT, our distributions to individual shareholders generally are not eligible for the reduced rates and are, consequently, taxed at ordinary income rates.
Our common shares dividend policy may change in the future.
The timing, amount and composition of any future dividends to our common shareholders will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Trust Managers and will depend upon a variety of factors as to which no assurance can be given. Our ability to make dividends to our common shareholders depends, in part, upon our operating results, overall financial condition, the performance of our portfolio (including occupancy levels and rental rates), our capital requirements, access to capital, our ability to qualify for taxation as a REIT and general business and market conditions. Any change in our dividend policy could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.
Our declaration of trust contains certain limitations associated with share ownership.
To maintain our status as a REIT, our declaration of trust prohibits any individual from owning more than 9.8% of our outstanding common shares. This restriction is likely to discourage third parties from acquiring control without the consent of our Board of Trust Managers, even if a change in control were in the best interests of our shareholders.
Also, our declaration of trust requires the approval of the holders of 80% of our outstanding common shares and the approval by not less than 50% of the outstanding common shares not owned by any related person (a person owning more than 50% of our common shares) to consummate a business transaction such as a merger. There are certain exceptions to this requirement; however, the 80% approval requirement could make it difficult for us to consummate a business transaction even if it is in the best interest of our shareholders.

10

Table of Contents

There may be future dilution of our common shares.
Our declaration of trust authorizes our Board of Trust Managers to, among other things, issue additional common or preferred shares or securities convertible or exchangeable into equity securities, without shareholder approval. We may issue such additional equity or convertible securities to raise additional capital. The issuance of any additional common or preferred shares or convertible securities could be substantially dilutive to holders of our common shares. Moreover, to the extent that we issue restricted shares, options, or warrants to purchase our common shares in the future and those options or warrants are exercised or the restricted shares vest, our shareholders may experience further dilution. Holders of our common shares have no preemptive rights that entitle them to purchase a pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or offerings could result in increased dilution to our shareholders.
We may issue debt and equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, any of which may be senior to our common shares as to distributions and in liquidation, which could negatively affect the value of our common shares.
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by entering into unsecured or secured debt or debt-like financings, or by issuing additional debt or equity securities, which could include issuances of medium-term notes, senior notes, subordinated notes, secured debt, guarantees, preferred shares, hybrid securities, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities. In the event of our liquidation, our lenders and holders of our debt and preferred securities would receive distributions of our available assets before distributions to the holders of our common shares. Because any decision to incur debt and issue securities in future offerings may be influenced by market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of our future financings. Further, market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our securities in the future.

10

Table of Contents

Loss of our key personnel could adversely affect the value of our common shares and operations.
We are dependent on the efforts of our key executive personnel. Although we believe qualified replacements could be found for these key executives, the loss of their services could adversely affect the value of our common shares and operations.
Changes in accounting standards may adversely impact our reported financial condition and results of operations.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), in conjunction with the SEC, has several key projects on their agenda that could impact how we currently account for our material transactions, including lease accounting and other convergence projects with the International Accounting Standards Board. We believe that these and other potential proposals could have varying degrees of impact on us ranging from minimal to material. At this time, we are unable to predict with certainty which, if any, proposals may be passed or what level of impact any such proposal could have on us.
We could be subject to litigation that may negatively impact our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we may be a defendant in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings relating to our business. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation or proceedings. We could experience a negative impact to our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations due to an unfavorable outcome.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Actcertain laws and fire, safetygovernmental rules and other regulations may require us to make unintended expenditures that adversely affect our cash flows.
All of our properties are required to comply with certain laws and governmental rules and regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, (“ADA”). The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities,” but generally requires that buildings be made accessible to people with disabilities. Compliance with the ADA requirements could require removal of access barriers, and noncompliance could result in imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages to private litigants, or both. While the tenants to whom we lease properties are obligated by law to comply with the ADA provisions, and typically under tenant leases are obligated to cover costs associated with compliance, if required changes involve greater expenditures than anticipated, or if the changes must be made on a more accelerated basis than anticipated, the ability of these tenants to cover costs could be adversely affected. As a result, we could be required to expend funds to comply with the provisions of the ADA, which could adversely affect the results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to shareholders. In addition, we are required to operate the properties in compliance with fire and safety regulations, building codes and other land use regulations, as they may be in effect or adopted by governmental agencies and bodies and become applicable to theour properties. We may be required to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with those requirements, and these expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet the financial obligations and make distributions to our shareholders.

11

Table of Contents

An uninsured loss or a loss that exceeds the policies on our properties could subject us to lost capital or revenue on those properties.
Under the terms and conditions of the leases currently in force on our properties, tenants generally are required to indemnify and hold us harmless from liabilities resulting from injury to persons, air, water, land or property, on or off the premises, due to activities conducted on the properties, except for claims arising from our negligence or intentional misconduct or that of our agents. Tenants are generally required, at the tenant’s expense, to obtain and keep in full force during the term of the lease, liability and tenant's property damage insurance policies. We have obtained comprehensive liability, casualty, property, flood and rental loss insurance policies on our properties. All of these policies may involve substantial deductibles and certain exclusions. In addition, we cannot assure the shareholders that the tenants will properly maintain their insurance policies or have the ability to pay the deductibles. Should a loss occur that is uninsured or in an amount exceeding the combined aggregate limits for the policies noted above, or in the event of a loss that is subject to a substantial deductible under an insurance policy, we could lose all or part of our capital invested in, and anticipated revenue from, one or more of the properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to make distributions to the shareholders.
We may be subject to liability under environmental laws, ordinances and regulations.
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, we may be considered an owner or operator of real property or have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. As a result, we may become liable for the costs of disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances released on or in our property. We may also be liable for certain other potential costs that could relate to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property). We may incur such liability whether or not we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances.

11

Table of Contents

Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could have an adverse effect on our cash flow and operating results.
Changing weather patterns and climatic conditions, such as global warming, may have added to the unpredictability and frequency of natural disasters in some parts of the world and created additional uncertainty as to future trends and exposures. Our operations are located in many areas that are subject to natural disasters and severe weather conditions such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, droughts, floods and fires. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can delay new development projects, increase investment costs to repair or replace damaged properties, increase future property insurance costs, and negatively impact the tenant demand for lease space. If insurance is unavailable to us or is unavailable on acceptable terms, or if our insurance is not adequate to cover business interruption or losses from these events, our earnings, liquidity or capital resources could be adversely affected.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions.
We face risks relating to cybersecurity attacks, loss of confidential information and other business disruptions.
Our business is at risk from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our confidential data and other electronic security breaches. Such cybersecurity attacks can range from individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems to more sophisticated security threats. While we employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats including a defense in depth strategy of malware detection, password protection, backup servers and periodic penetration testing, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cybersecurity attack. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. Cybersecurity incidents could compromise the confidential information of our tenants, employees and third-party vendors and disrupt and affect the efficiency of our business operations.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.


12

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Properties
At December 31, 2012, our real estate properties consisted of 294 locations in 21 states. A complete listing of these properties, including the name, location, building area and land area, is as follows (in square feet):
Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Retail    
Arizona    
Arrowhead Festival S.C., 75th Ave. at W. Bell Rd., Glendale 194,309
 157,000
Broadway Marketplace, Broadway at Rural, Tempe 87,379
 347,000
Camelback Village Square, Camelback at 7th Avenue, Phoenix 242,715
 543,000
Desert Village, Pinnacle Peak Rd.at Pima Rd., Scottsdale 107,071
 595,901
Entrada de Oro, Magee Road and Oracle Road, Tucson 109,075
 572,000
Fountain Plaza, 77th St. at McDowell, Scottsdale 305,588
 445,000
Laveen Village Market, Baseline Rd. at 51st St., Phoenix 318,805
 372,274
Madera Village, Tanque Verde Rd. and Catalina Hwy., Tucson 106,858
 419,000
Mohave Crossroads, Bullhead Parkway at State Route 95, Bullhead City 395,477
 990,867
Monte Vista Village Center, Baseline Rd. at Ellsworth Rd., Mesa 108,551
 353,000
Oracle Crossings, Oracle Highway and Magee Road, Tucson 261,194
 1,307,000
Oracle Wetmore, Wetmore Road and Oracle Highway, Tucson 343,237
 711,162
Palmilla Center, Dysart Rd. at McDowell Rd., Avondale 178,219
 264,000
Pueblo Anozira, McClintock Dr. at Guadalupe Rd., Tempe 157,607
 769,000
Raintree Ranch, Ray Rd. at Price Rd., Chandler 133,020
 714,813
Rancho Encanto, 35th Avenue at Greenway Rd., Phoenix 72,170
 246,440
Red Mountain Gateway, Power Rd. at McKellips Rd., Mesa 199,012
 353,000
Scottsdale Horizon, Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd. and Thompson Peak Parkway, Scottsdale 148,383
 61,000
Shoppes at Bears Path, Tanque Verde Rd. and Bear Canyon Rd., Tucson 66,131
 362,000
Squaw Peak Plaza, 16th Street at Glendale Ave., Phoenix 60,728
 220,000
The Shoppes at Parkwood Ranch, Southern Avenue and Signal Butte Road, Mesa 106,738
 569,966
Valley Plaza, S. McClintock at E. Southern, Tempe 153,880
 570,000
Arizona, Total 3,856,147
 10,943,423
Arkansas    
Markham Square, W. Markham at John Barrow, Little Rock 125,884
 514,000
Markham West, 11400 W. Markham, Little Rock 178,500
 769,000
Westgate, Cantrell at Bryant, Little Rock 52,626
 206,000
Arkansas, Total 357,010
 1,489,000
California    
580 Market Place, E. Castro Valley at Hwy. I-580, Castro Valley 100,165
 444,000
8000 Sunset Strip Shopping Center, Sunset Blvd. and Crescent Heights Blvd., Los Angeles 171,375
 89,298
Arcade Square, Watt Ave. at Whitney Ave., Sacramento 76,497
 234,000
Buena Vista Marketplace, Huntington Dr. at Buena Vista St., Duarte 115,340
 322,000
Centerwood Plaza, Lakewood Blvd. at Alondra Dr., Bellflower 75,486
 333,000
Chino Hills Marketplace, Chino Hills Pkwy. at Pipeline Ave., Chino Hills 310,991
 1,187,000
Creekside Center, Alamo Dr. at Nut Creek Rd., Vacaville 114,445
 400,000
Discovery Plaza, W. El Camino Ave. at Truxel Rd., Sacramento 93,398
 417,000
El Camino Promenade, El Camino Real at Via Molena, Encinitas 129,676
 451,000
Freedom Centre, Freedom Blvd. at Airport Blvd., Watsonville 150,241
 543,000
Fremont Gateway Plaza, Paseo Padre Pkwy. at Walnut Ave., Fremont 361,701
 650,000
Greenhouse Marketplace, Lewelling Blvd. at Washington Ave., San Leandro 236,832
 578,000
Hallmark Town Center, W. Cleveland Ave. at Stephanie Ln., Madera 98,359
 365,000
Jess Ranch Marketplace, Bear Valley Rd. at Jess Ranch Pkwy., Apple Valley (1)(3)307,937
 920,423
Jess Ranch Phase III, Bear Valley Road at Jess Ranch Parkway, Apple Valley (1)(3)194,362
 700,431

13

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Marshalls Plaza, McHenry at Sylvan Ave., Modesto 85,952
 218,000
Menifee Town Center, Antelope Rd. at Newport Rd., Menifee 248,734
 658,000
Prospectors Plaza, Missouri Flat Rd. at US Hwy. 50, Placerville 236,959
 866,684
Rancho San Marcos Village, San Marcos Blvd. at Rancho Santa Fe Rd., San Marcos 132,689
 541,000
San Marcos Plaza, San Marcos Blvd. at Rancho Santa Fe Rd., San Marcos 81,086
 116,000
Shasta Crossroads (II), Churn Creek Rd. and State Hwy. 44, Redding (1)(3)90,663
 252,783
Shasta Crossroads, Churn Creek Rd. at Dana Dr., Redding 176,866
 520,000
Silver Creek Plaza, E. Capital Expressway at Silver Creek Blvd., San Jose 197,925
 573,000
Southampton Center, IH-780 at Southampton Rd., Benecia 162,764
 596,000
Stoneridge Town Centre, Highway 60 at Nason St., Moreno Valley (1)(3)431,272
 1,104,246
Stony Point Plaza, Stony Point Rd. at Hwy. 12, Santa Rosa 200,571
 619,000
Summerhill Plaza, Antelope Rd. at Lichen Dr., Sacramento 128,835
 704,000
Sunset Center, Sunset Ave. at State Hwy. 12, Suisun City 98,279
 359,000
Tully Corners Shopping Center, Tully Rd. at Quimby Rd., San Jose (1)(3)115,992
 430,891
Valley, Franklin Blvd. and Mack Rd., Sacramento 107,005
 580,000
Westminster Center, Westminster Blvd. at Golden West St., Westminster 425,690
 1,739,000
California, Total 5,458,087
 17,511,756
Colorado    
Aurora City Place, E. Alameda at I225, Aurora (1)(3)542,956
 2,260,000
Cherry Creek, E. Alameda Ave. at S. Colorado Blvd. 272,671
 330,795
CityCenter Englewood, S. Santa Fe at Hampden Ave., Englewood (1)(3)359,213
 452,941
Crossing at Stonegate, Jordon Rd. at Lincoln Ave., Parker (1)(3)109,058
 870,588
Edgewater Marketplace, Sheridan Blvd. at 17th Ave., Edgewater 270,553
 538,576
Green Valley Ranch Towne Center, Tower Rd. at 48th Ave., Denver (1)(3)114,947
 276,000
Lowry Town Center, 2nd Ave. at Lowry Ave., Denver (1)(3)129,398
 246,000
River Point at Sheridan, Highway 85 and Highway 285, Sheridan (1)525,761
 3,477,208
Thorncreek Crossing, Washington St. at 120th St., Thornton (1)(3)386,127
 1,156,863
Westminster Plaza, North Federal Blvd. at 72nd Ave., Westminster (1)111,113
 636,000
Colorado, Total 2,821,797
 10,244,971
Florida    
Alafaya Square, Alafaya Trail, Oviedo (1)(3)176,486
 915,000
Argyle Village, Blanding at Argyle Forest Blvd., Jacksonville 315,497
 1,329,000
Atlantic North, Kernan Blvd. at Atlantic Blvd., Jacksonville (1)(3)67,685
 326,061
Atlantic West, Kernan Blvd. at Atlantic Blvd., Jacksonville (1)(3)163,481
 584,304
Boca Lyons, Glades Rd. at Lyons Rd., Boca Raton 117,515
 545,000
Clermont Landing, U.S. 27 & Steve's Road, Clermont (1)(3)337,713
 2,039,915
Colonial Landing, East Colonial Dr. at Maguire Boulevard, Orlando (1)260,224
 980,000
Colonial Plaza, E. Colonial Dr. at Primrose Dr., Orlando 502,182
 2,009,000
Countryside Centre, US Highway 19 at Countryside Boulevard, Clearwater 248,367
 906,440
East Lake Woodlands, East Lake Road and Tampa Road, Palm Harbor (1)(3)140,543
 730,000
Embassy Lakes, Sheraton St. at Hiatus Rd., Cooper City 179,937
 618,000
Epic Village - St. Augustine, SR 207 at Rolling Hills Dr., St. Augustine (1)64,180
 773,626
Flamingo Pines, Pines Blvd. at Flamingo Rd., Pembroke Pines 266,761
 739,925
Flamingo Pines, Pines Blvd. at Flamingo Rd., Pembroke Pines (1)(3)148,840
 707,075
Hollywood Hills Plaza, Hollywood Blvd. at North Park Rd., Hollywood (1)(3)408,509
 1,429,000
Indian Harbour Place, East Eau Gallie Blvd., Indian Harbour Beach (1)(3)163,521
 636,000
International Drive Value Center, International Dr. and Touchstone Dr., Orlando (1)(3)185,664
 985,000
Kendall Corners, Kendall Drive and SW 127th Avenue, Miami (1)(3)96,472
 365,000
Kernan Village, Kernan Blvd. at Atlantic Blvd., Jacksonville (1)(3)288,780
 615,114
Lake Washington Crossing, Wickham Rd. at Lake Washington Rd., Melbourne (1)(3)118,828
 580,000
Lake Washington Square, Wickham Rd. at Lake Washington Rd., Melbourne 111,835
 688,000

14

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Largo Mall, Ulmerton Rd. at Seminole Ave., Largo 575,134
 1,888,000
Market at Southside, Michigan Ave. at Delaney Ave., Orlando 159,762
 349,000
Marketplace at Seminole Towne Center, Central Florida Greenway and Rinehart Rd., Sanford 484,048
 1,743,000
Northridge, E. Commercial Blvd. at Dixie Hwy., Oakland Park (1)(3)239,097
 901,000
Palm Lakes Plaza, Atlantic Boulevard and Rock Island Road, Maragate (1)(3)113,752
 550,000
Palms of Carrollwood, N. Dale Maybry Dr. at Fletcher Ave., Tampa 167,887
 679,536
Paradise Key at Kelly Plantation, US Highway 98 and Mid Bay Bridge Rd., Destin (1)(3)271,777
 1,247,123
Pembroke Commons, University at Pines Blvd., Pembroke Pines (1)(3)324,829
 1,394,000
Phillips Crossing, Interstate 4 and Sand Lake Road, Orlando 145,644
 697,000
Phillips Landing, Turkey Lake Rd., Orlando 286,038
 311,000
Pineapple Commons, Us Highway 1 and Britt Rd., Stuart (1)(3)270,395
 762,736
Publix at Laguna Isles, Sheridan St. at SW 196th Ave., Pembroke Pines 69,475
 400,000
Quesada Commons, Quesada Ave. and Toledo Blade Blvd., Port Charlotte (1)(3)58,890
 312,000
Shoppes at Paradise Isle, 34940 Emerald Coast Pkwy., Destin (1)(3)171,669
 764,000
Shoppes at Parkland, Hillsboro Blvd. at State Rd. #7, Parkland (1)167,131
 905,000
Shoppes of Port Charlotte, Toledo Blade Blvd. and Tamiami Trail, Port Charlotte (1)(3)41,011
 276,000
Shoppes of Port Charlotte, Toledo Blade Blvd. and Tamiami Trail, Port Charlotte (1)(3)3,921
 176,720
Sunrise West Shopping Center, West Commercial Dr. and NW 91st Ave., Sunrise (1)(3)76,321
 540,000
Sunset 19, US Hwy. 19 at Sunset Pointe Rd., Clearwater 275,910
 1,078,000
Tamiami Trail Shops, S.W. 8th St. at S.W. 137th Ave., Miami (1)(3)132,564
 515,000
The Marketplace at Dr. Phillips, Dr. Phillips Boulevard and Sand Lake Road, Orlando (1)(3)326,088
 1,495,000
The Shoppes at South Semoran, Semoran Blvd. at Pershing Ave., Orlando 101,486
 451,282
TJ Maxx Plaza, 117th Avenue at Sunset Blvd., Kendall 161,429
 540,000
University Palms, Alafaya Trail at McCullough Rd., Oviedo (1)105,127
 522,000
Vizcaya Square, Nob Hill Rd. at Cleary Blvd., Plantation 110,081
 521,000
Westland Terrace Plaza, SR 50 at Apopka Vineland Rd., Orlando 77,521
 361,000
Whole Foods @ Carrollwood, Northdale Blvd. at North Dale Mabry 37,144
 275,735
Winter Park Corners, Aloma Ave. at Lakemont Ave., Winter Park 102,382
 400,000
Florida, Total 9,419,533
 38,556,592
Georgia    
Brookwood Marketplace, Peachtree Pkwy. at Mathis Airport Rd., Suwannee 397,295
 1,459,000
Brookwood Square, East-West Connector at Austell Rd., Austell 234,501
 971,000
Brownsville Commons, Brownsville Rd. and Hiram-Lithia Springs Rd., Powder Springs 81,886
 205,000
Camp Creek Marketplace II, Camp Creek Pkwy. and Carmla Dr., Atlanta 228,003
 724,000
Cherokee Plaza, Peachtree Road and Colonial Drive, Atlanta (1)99,749
 336,000
Dacula Marketplace, Fence Rd. at Dacula Rd., Dacula 116,943
 279,220
Dallas Commons, US Hwy. 278 and Nathan Dean Blvd., Dallas 95,262
 244,000
Grayson Commons, Grayson Hwy. at Rosebud Rd., Grayson 76,611
 507,383
Lakeside Marketplace, Cobb Pkwy. (US Hwy. 41), Acworth 332,044
 736,000
Mansell Crossing, North Point Parkway at Mansell Rd., Alpharetta (1)(3)102,931
 582,833
Perimeter Village, Ashford-Dunwoody Rd., Atlanta 381,125
 1,803,820
Publix at Princeton Lakes, Carmia Dr. and Camp Creek Dr., Atlanta (1)(3)72,207
 336,000
Reynolds Crossing, Steve Reynolds and Old North Cross Rd., Duluth 115,983
 407,000
Roswell Corners, Woodstock Rd. at Hardscrabble Rd., Roswell 314,014
 733,101
Roswell Crossing, King Rd. and W. Crossville Rd., Roswell 201,979
 1,011,093
Sandy Plains Exchange, Sandy Plains at Scufflegrit, Marietta (1)72,784
 452,000
Thompson Bridge Commons, Thompson Bridge Rd. at Mt. Vernon Rd., Gainesville (1)95,587
 540,000
Georgia, Total 3,018,904
 11,327,450
Kentucky    
Festival at Jefferson Court, Outer Loop at Jefferson Blvd., Louisville 218,396
 1,153,000
Millpond Center, Boston at Man O’War, Lexington 151,498
 773,000

15

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Regency Shopping Centre, Nicholasville Rd. & West Lowry Ln., Lexington 189,016
 590,000
Tates Creek, Tates Creek at Man O’ War, Lexington 198,235
 586,384
Kentucky, Total 757,145
 3,102,384
Louisiana    
14/Park Plaza, Hwy. 14 at General Doolittle, Lake Charles 172,068
 535,000
Danville Plaza, Louisville at 19th, Monroe 141,218
 539,000
K-Mart Plaza, Ryan St., Lake Charles (1)(3)232,390
 126,000
Manhattan Place, Manhattan Blvd. at Gretna Blvd., Harvey 276,615
 718,339
Southgate, Ryan at Eddy, Lake Charles 158,587
 511,000
Town & Country Plaza, U.S. Hwy. 190 West, Hammond 224,827
 656,021
University Place, 70th St. at Youree Dr., Shreveport 381,253
 1,114,265
Westwood Village, W. Congress at Bertrand, Lafayette 138,034
 942,000
Louisiana, Total 1,724,992
 5,141,625
Maryland    
Pike Center, Rockville Pike and Bou Ave., Rockville 81,336
 292,462
Maryland, Total 81,336
 292,462
Missouri    
Ballwin Plaza, Manchester Rd. at Vlasis Dr., Ballwin 200,915
 653,000
Western Plaza, Hwy 141 at Hwy. 30, Fenton (1)(3)56,734
 654,000
Missouri, Total 257,649
 1,307,000
Nevada    
Best in the West, Rainbow at Lake Mead Rd., Las Vegas 428,067
 1,516,000
Charleston Commons, Charleston and Nellis, Las Vegas 362,514
 1,314,791
College Park S.C., E. Lake Mead Blvd. at Civic Ctr. Dr., North Las Vegas 195,367
 721,000
Eastern Horizon, Eastern Ave. at Horizon Ridge Pkwy., Henderson 209,727
 478,000
Francisco Centre, E. Desert Inn Rd. at S. Eastern Ave., Las Vegas 148,815
 639,000
Mission Center, Flamingo Rd. at Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas 212,169
 570,000
Paradise Marketplace, Flamingo Rd. at Sandhill, Las Vegas 148,092
 323,556
Rainbow Plaza, Phase I, Rainbow Blvd. at Charleston Blvd., Las Vegas 136,369
 514,518
Rainbow Plaza, Rainbow Blvd. at Charleston Blvd., Las Vegas 273,916
 1,033,482
Rancho Towne & Country, Rainbow Blvd. at Charleston Blvd., Las Vegas 139,839
 350,000
Tropicana Beltway, Tropicana Beltway at Fort Apache Rd., Las Vegas 617,821
 1,466,000
Tropicana Marketplace, Tropicana at Jones Blvd., Las Vegas 142,643
 309,912
Westland Fair North, Charleston Blvd. at Decatur Blvd., Las Vegas 602,904
 1,008,451
Nevada, Total 3,618,243
 10,244,710
New Mexico    
Eastdale, Candelaria Rd. at Eubank Blvd., Albuquerque 119,091
 601,000
North Towne Plaza, Academy Rd. at Wyoming Blvd., Albuquerque 142,106
 607,000
Pavillions at San Mateo, I-40 at San Mateo, Albuquerque 208,691
 604,733
Wyoming Mall, Academy Rd. at Northeastern, Albuquerque 270,899
 271,407
New Mexico, Total 740,787
 2,084,140
North Carolina    
Avent Ferry, Avent Ferry Rd. at Gorman St., Raleigh 111,622
 669,000
Bull City Market, Broad St. at West Main St., Durham 40,875
 112,000
Capital Square, Capital Blvd. at Huntleigh Dr., Cary 143,063
 607,000
Chatham Crossing, US 15/501 at Plaza Dr., Chapel Hill (1)(3)96,155
 424,000
Cole Park Plaza, US 15/501 and Plaza Dr., Chapel Hill (1)(3)82,258
 380,000
Falls Pointe, Neuce Rd. at Durant Rd., Raleigh 198,553
 659,000
Galleria, Galleria Boulevard and Sardis Road, Charlotte 328,276
 799,000
Harrison Pointe, Harrison Ave. at Maynard Rd., Cary 130,934
 1,222,382
Heritage Station, Forestville Rd. at Rogers Rd., Wake Forest (1)77,669
 341,035

16

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
High House Crossing, NC Hwy. 55 at Green Level W. Rd., Cary 90,155
 606,000
Hope Valley Commons, Highway 751 and Highway 54, Durham 81,371
 1,247,123
Leesville Town Centre, Leesville Rd. at Leesville Church Rd., Raleigh 114,396
 904,000
Northwoods Market, Maynard Rd. at Harrison Ave., Cary 77,802
 431,000
Parkway Pointe, Cory Parkway at S. R. 1011, Cary 80,061
 461,000
Ravenstone Commons, Hwy. 98 at Sherron Rd., Durham 60,424
 374,000
Six Forks Station, Six Forks Rd. at Strickland Rd., Raleigh 466,585
 1,843,000
Steele Creek Crossing, York Rd. at Steele Creek Rd., Charlotte 77,301
 491,000
Stonehenge Market, Creedmoor Rd. at Bridgeport Dr., Raleigh 188,521
 669,000
Surf City Crossing, Highway 17 and Highway 210, Surf City 63,016
 434,311
Waterford Village, U.S. Hwy. 17 & U.S. Hwy. 74/76, Leland 89,715
 1,426,594
Whitehall Commons, NWC of Hwy. 49 at I-485, Charlotte 444,561
 360,000
North Carolina, Total 3,043,313
 14,460,445
Oklahoma    
Town and Country, Reno Ave. at North Air Depot, Midwest City 128,231
 540,000
Oklahoma, Total 128,231
 540,000
Oregon    
Clackamas Square, SE 82nd Avenue and SE Causey Avenue, Portland (1)(3)136,551
 215,000
Oak Grove Market Center, SE Mcloughlin Blvd. & Oak Grove Ave., Portland 97,177
 292,288
Raleigh Hills Plaza, SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. and SW Scholls Ferry Road, Portland (1)(3)39,520
 165,000
Oregon, Total 273,248
 672,288
South Carolina    
Fresh Market Shoppes, 890 William Hilton Head Pkwy., Hilton Head (1)(3)86,120
 436,000
South Carolina, Total 86,120
 436,000
Tennessee    
Bartlett Towne Center, Bartlett Blvd. at Stage Rd., Bartlett 192,624
 774,000
Commons at Dexter Lake Phase II, Dexter at N. Germantown, Memphis (1)66,838
 272,792
Commons at Dexter Lake, Dexter at N. Germantown, Memphis (1)178,558
 740,208
Highland Square, Summer at Highland, Memphis 14,490
 84,000
Mendenhall Commons, South Mendenahall Rd. and Sanderlin Ave., Memphis (1)88,108
 250,000
Ridgeway Trace, Poplar Avenue and Ridgeway Road, Memphis 307,727
 222,553
Summer Center, Summer Ave. at Waring Rd., Memphis 139,021
 560,000
Tennessee, Total 987,366
 2,903,553
Texas    
10/Federal, I-10 at Federal, Houston (1)132,472
 474,000
Alabama-Shepherd, S. Shepherd at W. Alabama, Houston 56,969
 176,000
Angelina Village, Hwy. 59 at Loop 287, Lufkin 248,199
 1,835,000
Bell Plaza, 45th Ave. at Bell St., Amarillo (1)130,631
 682,000
Bellaire Boulevard, Bellaire at S. Rice, Houston (1)41,273
 137,000
Boswell Towne Center, Highway 287 at Bailey Boswell Rd., Saginaw 88,008
 137,000
Braeswood Square, N. Braeswood at Chimney Rock, Houston 104,686
 422,000
Broadway , Broadway at 59th St., Galveston (1)74,604
 220,000
Broadway, S. Broadway at W. 9th St., Tyler 60,400
 259,000
Centre at Post Oak, Westheimer at Post Oak Blvd., Houston 183,940
 505,000
Champions Village, F.M. 1960 at Champions Forest Dr., Houston (1)384,400
 1,391,000
Crossroads, I-10 at N. Main, Vidor 115,798
 484,000
Cullen Plaza, Cullen at Wilmington, Houston (1)84,517
 318,000
Cypress Pointe, F.M. 1960 at Cypress Station, Houston 283,059
 737,000
Edgebrook, Edgebrook at Gulf Fwy., Houston (1)78,460
 360,000
Fiesta Trails, I-10 at DeZavala Rd., San Antonio 482,370
 1,589,000
Fiesta Village, Quitman at Fulton, Houston (1)30,249
 80,000

17

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Galveston Place, Central City Blvd. at 61st St., Galveston 210,537
 828,000
Gateway Station, I-35W and McAlister Rd., Burleson (1)68,500
 344,286
Glenbrook Square, Telephone Road, Houston (1)77,890
 320,000
Griggs Road, Griggs at Cullen, Houston (1)80,116
 382,000
Harrisburg Plaza, Harrisburg at Wayside, Houston (1)93,438
 334,000
HEB - Dairy Ashford & Memorial, Dairy Ashford and Memorial Drive, Houston 36,874
 118,740
Heights Plaza, 20th St. at Yale, Houston 71,777
 228,000
Horne Street Market, I-30 & Horne Street, Fort Worth 42,267
 223,463
Humblewood Shopping Plaza, Eastex Fwy. at F.M. 1960, Houston 279,226
 784,000
I-45/Telephone Rd. Center, I-45 at Maxwell Street, Houston (1)171,789
 658,586
Killeen Marketplace, 3200 E. Central Texas Expressway, Killeen 251,137
 512,000
Kirby Strip Center, Kirby Dr., Houston 10,005
 37,897
Lake Pointe Market Center, Dalrock Rd. at Lakeview Pkwy., Rowlett 121,689
 218,158
Las Tiendas Plaza, Expressway 83 at McColl Rd., McAllen (1)(3)500,067
 910,000
Lawndale, Lawndale at 75th St., Houston (1)52,127
 177,000
League City Plaza, I-45 at F.M. 518, League City (1)126,990
 680,000
Little York Plaza, Little York at E. Hardy, Houston (1)113,878
 483,000
Lyons Avenue, Lyons at Shotwell, Houston (1)67,629
 178,000
Market at Nolana, Nolana Ave. and 29th St., McAllen (1)(3)243,821
 181,300
Market at Sharyland Place, U.S. Expressway 83 and Shary Rd., Mission (1)(3)301,174
 543,000
Market at Town Center, Town Center Blvd., Sugar Land 388,865
 1,733,000
Market at Westchase, Westheimer at Wilcrest, Houston 84,081
 318,000
Market Street Shopping Center, Market at Baca, Houston (1)49,138
 134,000
Montgomery Plaza, Loop 336 West at I-45, Conroe 322,987
 1,156,784
Moore Plaza, S. Padre Island Dr. at Staples, Corpus Christi 599,622
 1,491,000
North Creek Plaza, Del Mar Blvd. at Hwy. I-35, Laredo 481,764
 1,251,000
North Oaks, F.M. 1960 at Veterans Memorial, Houston (1)405,186
 1,646,000
North Park Plaza, Eastex Fwy. at Dowlen, Beaumont (1)(3)302,606
 636,000
North Towne Plaza, U.S. 77 and 83 at SHFM 802, Brownsville 153,000
 303,715
North Triangle , I-45 at F.M. 1960, Houston 16,060
 113,000
Northbrook Center, Northwest Fwy. at W. 34th, Houston 173,288
 655,000
Northcross, N. 10th St. at Nolana Loop, McAllen (1)(3)75,465
 218,000
Northwest Crossing, N.W. Fwy. at Hollister, Houston (1)(3)300,310
 884,000
Oak Forest, W. 43rd at Oak Forest, Houston 151,324
 541,000
Oak Park Village, Nacogdoches at New Braunfels, San Antonio (1)64,287
 221,000
Old Navy Building, 1815 10th St., McAllen (1)(3)15,000
 62,000
Orchard Green, Gulfton at Renwick, Houston 74,983
 273,000
Overton Park Plaza, SW Loop 820/Interstate 20 at South Hulen St., Ft. Worth 465,259
 1,636,000
Palmer Plaza, F.M. 1764 at 34th St., Texas City 196,506
 367,000
Parliament Square II, W. Ave. at Blanco, San Antonio 54,541
 220,919
Parliament Square, W. Ave. at Blanco, San Antonio 64,950
 263,081
Phelan West, Phelan at 23rd St., Beaumont (1)(3)82,221
 88,509
Plantation Centre, Del Mar Blvd. at McPherson Rd., Laredo 143,015
 596,000
Preston Shepard Place, Preston Rd. at Park Blvd., Plano (1)(3)363,337
 1,359,072
Randall's/Cypress Station, F.M. 1960 at I-45, Houston 140,624
 618,000
Randall's/Kings Crossing, Kingwood Dr. at Lake Houston Pkwy., Houston (1)126,397
 624,000
Richmond Square, Richmond Ave. at W. Loop 610, Houston 93,944
 326,315
River Oaks East, W. Gray at Woodhead, Houston 71,265
 206,000
River Oaks West, W. Gray at S. Shepherd, Houston 248,663
 609,000
Rose-Rich, U.S. Hwy. 90A at Lane Dr., Rosenberg 102,641
 386,000
Sharyland Towne Crossing, Shary Rd. at Hwy. 83, Mission (1)(3)484,949
 2,008,000
Sheldon Forest North , North, I-10 at Sheldon, Houston 22,040
 131,000

18

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Sheldon Forest South , North, I-10 at Sheldon, Houston (1)75,340
 328,000
Shoppes at Memorial Villages, I-10 & Wirt Road, Houston 182,541
 516,768
Shops at Three Corners, S. Main at Old Spanish Trail, Houston (1)272,350
 1,007,143
South 10th St. HEB, S. 10th St. at Houston St., McAllen (1)(3)103,702
 368,000
Southgate, W. Fuqua at Hiram Clark, Houston (1)125,260
 533,000
Spring Plaza, Hammerly at Campbell, Houston (1)59,166
 202,000
Starr Plaza, U.S. Hwy. 83 at Bridge St., Rio Grande City (1)(3)176,693
 742,000
Stella Link, Stella Link at S. Braeswood, Houston 70,087
 423,588
Ten Blalock Square, I-10 at Blalock, Houston 97,277
 321,000
Thousand Oaks, Thousand Oaks Dr. at Jones Maltsberger Rd., San Antonio (1)162,322
 730,000
Tomball Marketplace, FM 2920 and Future 249, Tomball (2)232,071
 1,712,609
Valley View, West Ave. at Blanco Rd., San Antonio 91,544
 341,000
Village Arcade, University at Kirby, Houston 57,203
 276,503
Village Arcade-Phase II, University at Kirby, Houston 28,371
 60,099
Village Arcade-Phase III, University at Kirby, Houston 107,134
 231,156
Village Plaza at Bunker Hill, Bunker Hill Rd. at Interstate 10, Houston (1)(3)495,204
 1,921,649
Westchase Center, Westheimer at Wilcrest, Houston 331,027
 754,000
Westhill Village, Westheimer at Hillcroft, Houston 130,041
 479,000
Westwood Center, Culebra Road and Westwood Loop, San Antonio 77,758
 691,328
Texas, Total 14,694,375
 50,661,668
Utah    
300 West, S. 300 West at Paxton Ave., Salt Lake City (1)(3)182,119
 123,275
Alpine Valley Center, Main St. at State St., American Fork (1)(3)224,654
 447,045
Taylorsville Town Center, West 4700 South at Redwood Rd., Taylorsville 130,214
 399,000
West Jordan Town Center, West 7000 South at S. Redwood Rd., West Jordan 304,899
 814,000
Utah, Total 841,886
 1,783,320
Virginia    
Hilltop Village, Telegraph Rd. at Beulah Rd., Alexandria (1)(2)
 1,437,480
Virginia, Total 
 1,437,480
Washington    
Meridian Town Center, Meridian Avenue East and 132nd Street East, Puyallup (1)(3)143,012
 535,000
Mukilteo Speedway Center, Mukilteo Speedway, Lincoln Way, and Highway 99, Lynnwood (1)(3)90,273
 355,000
Promenade 23, S. Jackson St. at 23rd Ave., Seattle 96,660
 258,746
Rainer Square Plaza, Rainer Avenue South and South Charleston Street, Seattle (1)(3)107,423
 345,000
South Hill Center, 43rd Avenue Southwest and Meridian Street South, Puyallup (1)(3)134,010
 515,000
Washington, Total 571,378
 2,008,746
Other    
Arizona    
Arcadia Biltmore Plaza, Campbell Ave. at North 36th St., Phoenix 21,122
 74,000
Arizona, Total 21,122
 74,000
Tennessee    
Crowfarn Drive Warehouse, Crowfarn Dr. at Getwell Rd., Memphis (1)(3)158,849
 315,000
Outland Business Center, Outland Center Dr., Memphis (1)(3)410,438
 1,215,000
Tennessee, Total 569,287
 1,530,000
Texas    
1919 North Loop West, Hacket Drive at West Loop 610 North, Houston 138,058
 157,000
Citadel Plaza, Citadel Plaza Dr., Houston 121,000
 170,931
Houston Cold Storage Warehouse, 7080 Express Lane, Houston 129,271
 345,189
Texas, Total 388,329
 673,120

19

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Unimproved Land    
Arizona    
Bullhead Parkway at State Route 95, Bullhead City   312,761
Lon Adams Rd.at Tangerine Farms Rd., Marana   422,532
Southern Avenue and Signal Butte Road, Mesa   63,162
Arizona, Total   798,455
California    
Bear Valley Road at Jess Ranch Parkway Phase II, Apple Valley (1)(3)  138,956
Bear Valley Road at Jess Ranch Parkway Phase III, Apple Valley (1)(3)  473,497
California, Total   612,453
Colorado    
Highway 85 and Highway 285, Sheridan (1)  792,792
Colorado, Total   792,792
Florida    
SR 207 at Rolling Hills Dr, St. Augustine (1)  228,254
State Road 100 & Belle Terre Parkway, Palm Coast   292,288
Young Pines and Curry Ford Rd., Orange County   132,422
Florida, Total   652,964
Georgia    
NWC South Fulton Pkwy. @ Hwy. 92, Union City   3,554,496
Georgia, Total   3,554,496
Louisiana    
Ambassador Caffery at W. Congress, Lafayette   34,848
Louisiana, Total   34,848
Nevada    
SWC Highway 215 at Decatur, Las Vegas   707,414
Nevada, Total   707,414
North Carolina    
Creedmoor (Highway 50) and Crabtree Valley Avenue, Raleigh   510,959
Highway 17 and Highway 210, Surf City   2,024,233
U.S. Highway 1 at Caveness Farms Rd., Wake Forest   1,637,420
U.S. Hwy. 17 & U.S. Hwy. 74/76, Leland   549,727
North Carolina, Total   4,722,339
Tennessee    
Poplar Avenue and Ridgeway Road, Memphis   53,579
Tennessee, Total   53,579
Texas    
9th Ave. at 25th St., Port Arthur   243,065
Bissonnet at Wilcrest, Houston   40,946
Citadel Plaza at 610 North Loop, Houston   137,214
East Orem, Houston   121,968
FM 1957 (Potranco Road) and FM 211, San Antonio (1)  8,655,372
FM 2920 and Highway 249, Tomball   459,776
Gattis School Rd. at A.W. Grimes Blvd., Round Rock   100,188
Highway 3 at Highway 1765, Texas City   200,812
Kirkwood at Dashwood Drive, Houston   321,908
Leslie Rd. at Bandera Rd., Helotes   74,052
Mesa Road at Tidwell, Houston   105,501
Nolana Ave. and 29th St., McAllen (1)(3)  163,350
Northwest Freeway at Gessner, Houston   117,612
River Pointe Drive at Interstate 45, Conroe   72,745

20

Table of Contents

Center and Location 
Building
Total
 
Land
Total
Rock Prairie Rd. at Hwy. 6, College Station   394,218
SH 151 and Ingram Rd., San Antonio (1)  252,692
Shary Rd. at North Hwy. 83, Mission (1)(3)  1,560,319
U.S. 77 and 83 at SHFM 802, Brownsville   914,723
US Hwy. 281 at Wilderness Oaks, San Antonio   1,269,774
West Little York at Interstate 45, Houston   161,172
Texas, Total   15,367,407
Utah    
South 300 West & West Paxton Avenue, Salt Lake City (1)(3)  201,683
Utah, Total   201,683

21

Table of Contents


Property Listing Summary
as of December 31, 2012
ALL PROPERTIES BY STATE 
Number of
Properties
 
Building 
Total
 Land Total
Arizona 23
 3,877,269
 11,815,878
Arkansas 3
 357,010
 1,489,000
California 31
 5,458,087
 18,124,209
Colorado 10
 2,821,797
 11,037,763
Florida 48
 9,419,533
 39,209,556
Georgia 17
 3,018,904
 14,881,946
Kentucky 4
 757,145
 3,102,384
Louisiana 8
 1,724,992
 5,176,473
Maryland 1
 81,336
 292,462
Missouri 2
 257,649
 1,307,000
Nevada 12
 3,618,243
 10,952,124
New Mexico 4
 740,787
 2,084,140
North Carolina 21
 3,043,313
 19,182,784
Oklahoma 1
 128,231
 540,000
Oregon 3
 273,248
 672,288
South Carolina 1
 86,120
 436,000
Tennessee 8
 1,556,653
 4,487,132
Texas 87
 15,082,704
 66,702,195
Utah 4
 841,886
 1,985,003
Virginia 1
 
 1,437,480
Washington 5
 571,378
 2,008,746
Grand Total 294
 53,716,285
 216,924,563
Total Retail 288
 52,737,547
 187,149,013
Total Other 6
 978,738
 2,277,120
Total Unimproved Land     27,498,430
_________________
Total square footage includes 545,897 square feet of building area and 12,869,163 square feet of land leased from others.
Footnotes for detail property listing:
(1)Denotes property is held by a real estate joint venture or partnership; however, the building and land square feet figures include our partners’ ownership interest in the property.
(2)Denotes property currently under development.
(3)Denotes properties that are not consolidated under generally accepted accounting principles.
NOTE:Square feet are reflective of area available to be leased. Certain listed properties may have additional square feet that are not owned by us.

22

Table of Contents

General.    In 2012, no single property accounted for more than 3.1% of our total assets or 2.0% of revenues. The five largest properties, in the aggregate, represented approximately 8.6% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012; otherwise, none of the remaining properties accounted for more than 1.4% of our revenues during the same period.
The majority of our properties are owned directly by us (subject in some cases to mortgages), although our interests in some properties are held indirectly through interests in real estate joint ventures or under long-term leases. In our opinion, our properties are well maintained and in good repair, suitable for their intended uses, and adequately covered by insurance.
We participate in 56 real estate joint ventures or partnerships that hold an interest in 123 of our properties. Our ownership interest ranges from 10% to 99%; we are normally the managing or operating partner and receive a fee for acting in this capacity.
We may use a DownREIT operating partnership structure in the acquisition of some real estate properties. In these transactions, a fair value purchase price is agreed upon between us, as general partner of the DownREIT, and the seller where the seller receives operating partnership units in exchange for some or all of its ownership interest in the property. Each operating partnership unit is the equivalent of one of our common shares. These units generally give our partners the right to put their limited partnership units to us on or after the first anniversary of the entity’s formation. We may acquire these limited partnership units for either cash or a fixed number of our common shares at our discretion.
Shopping Centers.    At December 31, 20122014, we owned or operated under long-term leases, either directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, a total of 286234 developed income-producing propertiescenters, primarily neighborhood and 2 propertiescommunity shopping centers and three centers under various stages of construction and development, which are located in 21 states spanning the country from coast to coast.coast with approximately 45.3 million square feet of gross leasable area. Our centers are located principally in the South, West Coast and Southeast Coast of the U.S. with significant concentrations in Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas. We also owned interests in 34 parcels of land that totaled approximately 25.3 million square feet at December 31, 2014. These land parcels include approximately 1.6 million square feet of land adjacent to certain of our existing operating centers, which may be used for expansion of these centers, as well as approximately 23.7 million square feet of land, which may be used for new development.
AsIn 2014, no single center accounted for more than 3.4% of our total assets or 2.0% of base minimum rental revenues. The five largest centers, in the aggregate, represented approximately 9.4% of our base minimum rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 20122014,; otherwise, none of the weighted average occupancy rateremaining centers accounted for more than 1.8% of our shopping centers was 93.7% compared to 93.0% as of December 31, 2011. The average effective annualbase minimum rental per square foot was approximately $15.14 in 2012, $13.79 in 2011, $13.60 in 2010, $13.31 in 2009 and $13.16 in 2008 for shopping centers.
As of December 31, 2012, lease expirations forrevenues during the next 10 years, assuming tenants do not exercise renewal options, are as follows:same period.
        
Annual Net Rent
of Expiring Leases
Year 
Number of
Expiring
Leases
 
Square Feet
of Expiring
Leases
(000’s)
 
Percentage of
Leaseable
Square Feet
 
Total
(000’s)
 
Per Square
Foot
 
Percentage of
Total Annual
Net Rent
2013 760
 2,672
 5.07% $42,682
 $15.97
 10.54%
2014 845
 4,226
 8.01% 57,171
 13.53
 14.12%
2015 861
 4,083
 7.74% 57,789
 14.15
 14.27%
2016 678
 3,643
 6.91% 55,474
 15.23
 13.70%
2017 616
 3,533
 6.70% 56,809
 16.08
 14.03%
2018 271
 2,495
 4.73% 33,382
 13.38
 8.25%
2019 92
 1,098
 2.08% 15,568
 14.18
 3.85%
2020 77
 1,013
 1.92% 14,368
 14.18
 3.55%
2021 113
 1,473
 2.79% 20,056
 13.62
 4.95%
2022 97
 1,251
 2.37% 18,638
 14.90
 4.60%
Our shoppingcenters are designed to attract local area customers and are typically anchored by a supermarket or other national tenants (such as Kroger, Target or T.J. Maxx). The centers are primarily neighborhood and community shopping centers that often include discounters, warehouse clubs, dollar stores and specialty grocers as additional anchors or tenants, and typically range in size from 50,000 to 650,000 square feet of building area, as distinguished from large regional enclosed malls and small strip centers, which generally contain 5,000 to 25,000 square feet. Nonearea. Very few of the centers have climatizedclimate-controlled common areas, but are designed to allow retail customers to park their automobiles in close proximity to any retailer in the center. Our centers are customarily constructed of masonry, steel and glass, and all have lighted, paved parking areas, which are typically landscaped with berms, trees and shrubs. They are generally located at major intersections in close proximity to neighborhoods that have existing populations sufficient to support retail activities of the types conducted in our centers.

23

TableWe actively embrace various initiatives that support the future of Contentsenvironmentally friendly shopping centers. Our primary areas of focus include energy efficiency, waste recycling, water conservation and construction/development best practices. We recognize there are economic, environmental and social implications associated with the full range of our sustainability efforts, and that a commitment to incorporating sustainable practices will add long-term value to our centers
As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average occupancy rate for our centers was 95.5% compared to 94.9% as of December 31, 2013. The average base rent per square foot was approximately $16.24 in 2014, $15.66 in 2013, $15.14 in 2012, $13.79 in 2011 and $13.60 in 2010 for our centers.

We have approximately 6,8005,800 separate leases with 4,6003,800 different tenants. Included among our top revenue-producing tenants are: The Kroger Co., T.J.X.TJX Companies, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., H-E-B, Safeway Inc., Office Depot, Inc., PetSmart, HEB Grocery,Inc., Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc., Home Depot, Inc., Best Buy, Inc., The Sports Authority, Harris Teeter Inc. and Bed, Bath and Beyond.Whole Foods Market, Inc. The diversity of our tenant base is also evidenced by the fact that our largest tenant, The Kroger Co., accounted for only 3.2%3.5% of base minimum rental revenues during 20122014.
Our shopping center leases have lease terms generally ranging from three to five years for tenant space under 5,000 square feet and from 10 to 25 years for tenant space over 10,000 square feet. Leases with primary lease terms in excess of 10 years, generally for anchor and out-parcels, frequently contain renewal options which allow the tenant to extend the term of the lease for one or more additional periods, with each of these periods generally being of a shorter duration than the primary lease term. The rental rates paid during a renewal period are generally based upon the rental rate for the primary term; sometimes adjusted for inflation, market conditions or an amount of the tenant’s sales during the primary term.
Most of our leases provide for the monthly payment in advance of fixed minimum rentals, the tenants’ pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance (including fire and extended coverage, rent insurance and liability insurance) and common area maintenance for the center (based on estimates of the costs for these items). Some of the lease agreements with major or national tenants contain modifications of these basic provisions, such as placing a maximum contribution on their pro rata share of recoverable charges, in view of the financial condition, stability or desirability of those tenants. Certain leases also provide for the payment of additional rentals based on a percentage of the tenants’ sales. Utilities are generally paid directly by tenants except where common metering exists with respect to a center. In this case, we make payments for the utilities, and the tenants reimburse us on a monthly basis. Generally, our leases only permit the tenant to assign or sublease its space with our prior written consent, which we agree not to unreasonably withhold. Where a tenant is granted the right to assign its space, the lease agreement generally provides that the original lessee will remain liable for the payment of the lease obligations under that lease agreement. They also require the tenant to use its space for the purpose designated in its lease agreement and to operate its business on a continuous basis.
In the ordinary course of business, we have tenants who cease making payments under their leases or who file for bankruptcy protection. We are unable to predict or forecast the timing of store closings or unexpected vacancies. While we believe the effect of this will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity due to the significant diversification of our tenant base, the uncertainty in the economy and commercial credit markets could have a negative impact on us.
During 2012, we acquired four shopping centers located in California, Georgia, Maryland and Texas and other property for approximately $232.3 million, which includes the acquisition of a partner's 79.6% interest in an unconsolidated tenancy-in-common arrangement located in Louisiana.
During 2012, we sold 27 shopping centers and other retail property, either directly or through our interests in real estate joint ventures and partnerships. Of these dispositions, 15 were located in Texas, three in North Carolina, two each in Colorado and Louisiana and one each in Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Kansas and Oklahoma. We also sold three unconsolidated real estate joint venture interests and assigned a 75% consolidated joint venture interest to a partner. Aggregate gross sales proceeds including the assumption of debt from these transactions totaled $262.4 million and generated gains of $54.8 million.
We have a real estate limited partnership agreement with a foreign institutional investor to purchase up to $280 million of retail properties in various states. Our ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is 51%. To date, no properties have been purchased.
Other Properties.    At December 31, 2012, we owned, either directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, six other operating properties totaling approximately 1.0 million square feet of building area. Our other properties consist of office, bulk warehouse, business distribution and other service center assets ranging in size from 21,000 to 410,000 square feet. Similar to our shopping centers, these properties are customarily constructed of masonry, steel and glass, and have lighted, concrete parking areas and are well landscaped. These properties are located in Arizona, Tennessee and Texas.
During 2012, we sold 54 industrial properties with gross sales proceeds totaling $393.8 million and generated a gain of $20.4 million. Of these dispositions, 40 were located in Texas, six in Georgia, five in Florida, two in Virginia and one in Tennessee. Also, our interest in 19 industrial properties held in unconsolidated joint ventures, in which we are a partner, were sold through either a direct sale by the joint venture or the sale of our interest. Our share of the gross sales proceeds, including the assumption of debt, from these transactions totaled $45.8 million and generated a gain of $9.2 million. These dispositions marked our exit from the industrial real estate market.

2413


Tenant Lease Expirations
Land Held for Development.    AtAs of December 31, 20122014, we owned, either directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, 38 parcels of unimproved land consisting of approximately 27.5 million square feet of land area located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah. These properties include approximately 2.2 million square feet of land adjacent to certain of our existing developed properties, which may be usedlease expirations for expansion of these developments,the next 10 years, assuming tenants do not exercise renewal options, are as well as approximately 25.3 million square feet of land, which may be used for new development. Almost all of the land held for development is served by roads and utilities and are suitable for development as shopping centers and other retail space, and we intend to emphasize the development of these parcels for such purpose. We have approximately $121.3 million in land held for development. During 2012, we sold five land parcels, which were located in Arizona, California, North Carolina and two in Texas. Gross sales proceeds from these sales totaled $4.3 million and generated gains of $.5 million.follows:
        Annual Rent of Expiring Leases
Year 
Number of
Expiring
Leases
 
Square Feet
of Expiring
Leases
(000’s)
 
Percentage of
Leaseable
Square Feet
 
Total
(000’s)
 
Per Square
Foot
 
Percentage of
Total Annual
Net Rent
2015 607
 2,157
 4.76% $36,355
 $16.85
 9.83%
2016 764
 3,623
 8.00% 58,375
 16.11
 15.78%
2017 655
 3,187
 7.04% 54,469
 17.09
 14.72%
2018 564
 3,357
 7.41% 51,421
 15.32
 13.90%
2019 492
 3,226
 7.12% 47,502
 14.72
 12.84%
2020 193
 2,117
 4.67% 26,830
 12.67
 7.25%
2021 116
 1,374
 3.03% 19,326
 14.07
 5.22%
2022 88
 1,024
 2.26% 16,114
 15.74
 4.36%
2023 82
 706
 1.56% 11,432
 16.19
 3.09%
2024 109
 1,122
 2.48% 17,312
 15.43
 4.68%
New Development Properties.    
At December 31, 20122014, we had two propertiesfour projects in various stages of development, of which we own, partially or wholly, three properties and have a contractual commitment to purchase the retail portion of a mixed-use property. We have funded $58.382.8 million to date on these projects. We estimate our aggregate net investment upon completion to be $97.2156.6 million. These propertiesprojects are projectedforecasted to have an average stabilized return on investment of approximately 7.9%7.7% when completed. These two projects are estimatedUpon completion, the square footage to be completed in 2014 at aadded to the portfolio and the estimated cost per square foot of $225.66these four projects are as follows:
Estimated
Year of
Completion
 
Square Feet
(000’s)
 
Estimated
Cost per
Square Foot
2015 357 $230.31
2016 138 328.32
2017 63 465.35

14


Property Listing
The following table is a list of centers, summarized by state and upon completion will add 430,000includes our share of both consolidated and unconsolidated real estate partnerships and joint ventures as of December 31, 2014:

ALL PROPERTIES BY STATE 
Number of
Properties
 
Gross
Leasable
Area (GLA)
 
% of
Total GLA
Arizona 23
 3,882,837
 8.6%
Arkansas 3
 355,410
 0.8%
California 26
 4,933,349
 10.9%
Colorado 9
 2,746,258
 6.1%
Florida 35
 7,470,927
 16.5%
Georgia 14
 2,673,974
 5.9%
Kentucky 4
 761,919
 1.7%
Louisiana 3
 517,305
 1.1%
Maryland 2
 83,050
 0.2%
Missouri 1
 56,734
 0.1%
Nevada 12
 3,818,471
 8.4%
New Mexico 2
 259,087
 0.6%
North Carolina 16
 2,649,998
 5.9%
Oklahoma 1
 128,231
 0.3%
Oregon 3
 276,924
 0.6%
South Carolina 1
 86,694
 0.2%
Tennessee 5
 848,345
 1.9%
Texas 68
 12,576,407
 27.8%
Utah 3
 471,206
 1.0%
Virginia 1
 130,876
 0.3%
Washington 5
 563,623
 1.2%
Total 237
 45,291,625
 100%
___________________
Total square footage includes 518,056 square feet toof leased from others and 11.4 million square feet not owned or managed by us. Additionally, encumbrances on our portfolio. Also during 2012, we stabilized nine projects with an average development costproperties total $.6 billion. See Schedule III for additional information.
The following table is a detailed list of $258.96 per square foot, including leasing fees.centers, by state and includes our share of both consolidated and unconsolidated real estate partnerships and joint ventures as of December 31, 2014:
Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
Operating Properties          
Arizona            
Mohave Crossroads Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 100.0% 
 395,477
 
 (Target), (Kohl's), PetSmart, Staples, Bed Bath & Beyond, Ross Dress for Less
Arcadia Biltmore Plaza Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 21,122
 
 Weingarten Realty Regional Office, Endurance Rehab
Arrowhead Festival S.C. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 194,309
 
 (Sports Authority), (Toys “R” Us), (Bed Bath & Beyond)
Broadway Marketplace Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 87,379
 
 Office Max, Ace Hardware
Camelback Village Square Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 240,951
 Fry’s Supermarket Office Max
Desert Village Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 107,071
 AJ Fine Foods CVS
Fountain Plaza Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 305,588
 Fry’s Supermarket Dollar Tree, (Lowe's)
Laveen Village Market Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 318,805
 (Fry’s Supermarket) (Home Depot)

15


Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
Monte Vista Village Center Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 108,551
 (Safeway) 
Palmilla Center Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 178,219
 (Fry’s Supermarket) Office Max, PetSmart, Dollar Tree
Pueblo Anozira Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 157,607
 Fry’s Supermarket Petco, Dollar Tree
Raintree Ranch Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 133,020
 Whole Foods 
Rancho Encanto Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 72,170
 
 Smart & Final
Red Mountain Gateway Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 199,013
 
 (Target), Bed Bath & Beyond, Famous Footwear
Scottsdale Horizon Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 155,006
 Safeway CVS
Squaw Peak Plaza Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 60,728
 Sprouts Farmers Market 
The Shoppes at Parkwood Ranch Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 106,738
 
 Hobby Lobby, Dollar Tree
Valley Plaza Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 100.0% 
 154,588
 US Foods Ross Dress for Less
Entrada de Oro Tucson, AZ 100.0% 
 109,075
 Walmart Neighborhood Market 
Madera Village Tucson, AZ 100.0% 
 106,858
 Safeway Walgreens, Dollar Tree
Oracle Crossings Tucson, AZ 100.0% 
 261,194
 Sprouts Farmers Market Kohl's, Home Goods
Oracle Wetmore Tucson, AZ 100.0% 
 343,237
 
 (Home Depot), (Jo Ann Fabric) Cost Plus, PetSmart, Walgreens, Ulta Beauty
Shoppes at Bears Path Tucson, AZ 100.0% 
 66,131
 
 (Osco Drug)
Arizona Total:       3,882,837
    
Arkansas            
Markham Square Little Rock-N. Little Rock, AR 100.0% 
 124,284
 
 Burlington Coat Factory, Ross Dress for Less
Markham West Little Rock-N. Little Rock, AR 100.0% 
 178,500
 
 Academy, Office Depot, Michaels, Dollar Tree
Westgate Little Rock-N. Little Rock, AR 100.0% 
 52,626
 
 Stein Mart
Arkansas Total:       355,410
    
California            
8000 Sunset Strip Shopping Center Los Angeles-Long Beach et al, CA 100.0% 
 171,551
 Trader Joe's Crunch, Sundance Cinemas, CB2
Buena Vista Marketplace Los Angeles-Long Beach et al, CA 100.0% 
 90,805
 Ralph's Dollar Tree
Centerwood Plaza Los Angeles-Long Beach et al, CA 100.0% 
 75,486
 Superior Grocers Dollar Tree
Westminster Center Los Angeles-Long Beach et al, CA 100.0% 
 440,437
 Albertsons Home Depot, Ross Dress for Less, Petco, Rite Aid, Dollar Tree, 24 Hour Fitness
Hallmark Town Center Madera, CA 100.0% 
 98,359
 Food 4 Less Bally Total Fitness
Marshalls Plaza Modesto, CA 100.0% 
 85,952
 
 Marshalls, Dress Barn, Guitar Center
Chino Hills Marketplace Riverside et al, CA 100.0% 
 310,920
 Von’s Dollar Tree, 24 Hour Fitness, Rite Aid
Jess Ranch Marketplace Riverside et al, CA 100.0% 
 307,826
 (Winco Foods) Burlington Coat Factory, PetSmart, Rite Aid, Big 5
Jess Ranch Phase III Riverside et al, CA 100.0% 
 194,342
 (Winco Foods) Best Buy, Cinemark Theatres, Bed Bath & Beyond, 24 Hour Fitness
Menifee Town Center Riverside et al, CA 100.0% 
 258,734
 Ralph's Ross Dress for Less, Dollar Tree
Stoneridge Town Centre Riverside et al, CA 67.0% (1)(3) 434,450
 (Super Target) (Kohl's)
Discovery Plaza Sacramento-Arden et al, CA 100.0% 
 93,398
 Bel Air Market 
Prospectors Plaza Sacramento-Arden et al, CA 100.0% 
 252,521
 SaveMart Kmart, CVS, Ross
Summerhill Plaza Sacramento-Arden et al, CA 100.0% 
 128,835
 Raley’s Dollar Tree
Valley Sacramento-Arden et al, CA 100.0% 
 107,005
 Raley's 
El Camino Promenade San Diego-Carlsbad et al, CA 100.0% 
 129,676
 
 T.J. Maxx, Staples, Dollar Tree
Rancho San Marcos Village San Diego-Carlsbad et al, CA 100.0% 
 134,628
 Von’s 24 Hour Fitness
San Marcos Plaza San Diego-Carlsbad et al, CA 100.0% 
 81,086
 (Albertsons) 
580 Market Place San Francisco-Oakland et al, CA 100.0% 
 100,097
 Safeway 24 Hour Fitness, Petco
Fremont Gateway Plaza San Francisco-Oakland et al, CA 100.0% 
 368,701
 Raley’s 24 Hour Fitness, (Walgreens)
Greenhouse Marketplace San Francisco-Oakland et al, CA 100.0% 
 236,427
 (Safeway) (CVS), Jo-Ann Fabrics, 99 Cents Only, Factory 2 U, Petco
Silver Creek Plaza San Jose-Sunnyvale et al, CA 100.0% 
 202,820
 Safeway Walgreens, (Orchard Supply)
Freedom Centre Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 100.0% 
 150,865
 Safeway Rite Aid, Big Lots
Stony Point Plaza Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 100.0% 
 200,011
 Food Maxx Ross Dress for Less, Fallas Paredes
Creekside Center Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 100.0% 
 115,991
 Raley’s 
Southampton Center Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 100.0% 
 162,426
 Raley’s Ace Hardware, Dollar Tree
California Total:       4,933,349
    
Colorado            
Aurora City Place Denver-Aurora, CO 50.0% (1)(3) 542,956
 (Super Target) Sports Authority, Barnes & Noble, Ross Dress For Less, PetSmart
Cherry Creek Denver-Aurora, CO 100.0% 
 272,658
 (Super Target) Sports Authority, PetSmart
CityCenter Englewood Denver-Aurora, CO 51.0% (1)(3) 359,103
 
 (Walmart), Ross Dress for Less, Petco, Office Depot, Bally Total Fitness
Crossing at Stonegate Denver-Aurora, CO 51.0% (1)(3) 109,082
 King Sooper’s 

16


Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
Edgewater Marketplace Denver-Aurora, CO 100.0% 
 270,548
 King Sooper's Ace Hardware, (Target)
Green Valley Ranch Towne Center Denver-Aurora, CO 50.0% (1)(3) 114,881
 (King Sooper’s) 
Lowry Town Center Denver-Aurora, CO 50.0% (1)(3) 129,398
 (Albertsons) 
River Point at Sheridan Denver-Aurora, CO 100.0% 
 561,505
 
 (Target), (Costco), Regal Cinema, Michaels, Conn's
Thorncreek Crossing Denver-Aurora, CO 51.0% (1)(3) 386,127
 Sprouts, (Super Target) Barnes & Noble, Cost Plus, Michaels, OfficeMax, Dollar Tree
Colorado Total:       2,746,258
    
Florida            
Argyle Village Jacksonville, FL 100.0% 
 315,432
 Publix Bed Bath & Beyond, T.J. Maxx, Babies “R” Us, Jo-Ann’s Fabrics, Michaels
Atlantic West Jacksonville, FL 50.0% (1)(3) 180,578
 
 T.J. Maxx, Dollar Tree, Shoe Carnival, (Kohl's)
Epic Village - St. Augustine Jacksonville, FL 70.0% (1) 64,180
 
 (Epic Theaters)
Kernan Village Jacksonville, FL 50.0% (1)(3) 288,780
 (Walmart Supercenter) Ross Dress for Less, Petco
Boca Lyons Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 100.0% 
 117,423
 4th Generation Market Ross Dress for Less
Embassy Lakes Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 100.0% 
 179,937
 Winn Dixie Tuesday Morning, Dollar Tree
Flamingo Pines Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 100.0% 
 266,761
 (Walmart Supercenter) U.S. Post Office, Florida Technical College
Flamingo Pines Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 148,840
 Publix 
Hollywood Hills Plaza Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 405,145
 Publix Target, CVS
Northridge Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 236,628
 Publix Petco, Ross Dress for Less, Dollar Tree
Pembroke Commons Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 316,262
 Publix Marshalls, Office Depot, LA Fitness, Dollar Tree
Sunrise West Shopping Center Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 25.0% (1)(3) 84,597
 Publix 
Tamiami Trail Shops Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 132,564
 Publix CVS
TJ Maxx Plaza Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 100.0% 
 161,429
 Winn Dixie T.J. Maxx, Dollar Tree
Vizcaya Square Miami-Fort Lauderdale et al, FL 100.0% 
 110,081
 Winn Dixie 
Sea Ranch Centre Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL100.0% 
 98,950
 Publix CVS, Dollar Tree
Alafaya Square Orlando, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 176,341
 Publix 
Clermont Landing Orlando, FL 65.1% (1)(3) 339,294
 
 (J.C. Penney), (Epic Theater), T.J. Maxx, Ross Dress for Less, Michaels
Colonial Plaza Orlando, FL 100.0% 
 498,994
 
 Staples, Ross Dress for Less, Marshalls, Old Navy, Stein Mart, Barnes & Noble, Petco, Big Lots, Hobby Lobby
International Drive Value Center Orlando, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 185,365
 
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
Marketplace at Seminole Towne Center Orlando, FL 100.0% 
 500,607
 (Super Target) Marshalls, Ross Dress for Less, Old Navy, Sports Authority, Petco
Phillips Crossing Orlando, FL 100.0% 
 145,644
 Whole Foods Golf Galaxy, Michaels
The Marketplace at Dr. Phillips Orlando, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 326,090
 Publix Stein Mart, Home Goods, Morton's of Chicago, Office Depot
The Shoppes at South Semoran Orlando, FL 100.0% 
 101,611
 Walmart Neighborhood Market Dollar Tree
Winter Park Corners Orlando, FL 100.0% 
 102,382
 Whole Foods Market  
Indian Harbour Place Palm Bay-Melbourne et al, FL 25.0% (1)(3) 177,471
 Publix Bealls
Pineapple Commons Port St. Lucie-Fort Pierce, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 264,468
 
 Ross Dress for Less, Best Buy, PetSmart, Marshalls, (CVS)
Quesada Commons Punta Gorda, FL 25.0% (1)(3) 58,890
 Publix (Walgreens)
Shoppes of Port Charlotte Punta Gorda, FL 25.0% (1)(3) 63,108
 (Publix) Petco, (Walgreens)
Countryside Centre Tampa-St. Petersburg et al, FL 100.0% 
 248,253
 
 T.J. Maxx, Home Goods, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ross Dress for Less
East Lake Woodlands Tampa-St. Petersburg et al, FL 20.0% (1)(3) 133,306
 Walmart Neighborhood Market Walgreens
Largo Mall Tampa-St. Petersburg et al, FL 100.0% 
 574,588
 (Albertsons) Bealls, Marshalls, PetSmart, Bed Bath & Beyond, Staples, Michaels, (Target)
Palms of Carrollwood Tampa-St. Petersburg et al, FL 100.0% 
 154,118
 The Fresh Market Bed Bath & Beyond
Sunset 19 Tampa-St. Petersburg et al, FL 100.0% 
 275,910
 
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Staples, Comp USA, Barnes & Noble, Sports Authority, Old Navy
Whole Foods @ Carrollwood Tampa-St. Petersburg et al, FL 100.0%  (4) 36,900
 Whole Foods Market 
Florida Total:       7,470,927
    
Georgia            
Brookwood Marketplace Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 397,295
 (Super Target) Home Depot, Bed Bath & Beyond, Office Max
Brookwood Square Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 181,333
 
 Marshalls, LA Fitness
Brownsville Commons Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 81,886
 (Kroger) 
Camp Creek Marketplace II Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 228,003
 
 DSW, LA Fitness, Shopper's World, American Signature
Dallas Commons Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 95,262
 (Kroger) 
Grayson Commons Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 76,611
 Kroger 

17


Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
Lakeside Marketplace Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 332,889
 (Super Target) Ross Dress for Less, Petco
Mansell Crossing Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 20.0% (1)(3) 102,931
 
 buybuy BABY, Ross Dress for Less, Rooms to Go
Perimeter Village Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 373,621
 Walmart Supercenter Cost Plus World Market, DSW, Hobby Lobby
Publix at Princeton Lakes Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 20.0% (1)(3) 72,207
 Publix 
Reynolds Crossing Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 115,983
 (Kroger) 
Roswell Corners Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 318,387
 (Super Target) Staples, T.J. Maxx
Roswell Crossing Atlanta-Sandy Springs et al, GA 100.0% 
 201,979
 Trader Joe's Office Max, PetSmart, Walgreens
Thompson Bridge Commons Gainesville, GA 100.0%  (4) 95,587
 (Kroger) 
Georgia Total:       2,673,974
    
Kentucky            
Millpond Center Lexington-Fayette, KY 100.0% 
 151,498
 Kroger 
Regency Shopping Centre Lexington-Fayette, KY 100.0% 
 188,782
 (Kroger) T.J. Maxx, Michaels
Tates Creek Lexington-Fayette, KY 100.0% 
 203,532
 Kroger Rite Aid
Festival at Jefferson Court Louisville, KY-IN 100.0% 
 218,107
 Kroger (PetSmart), (TJ Maxx), Staples, Party City
Kentucky Total:       761,919
    
Louisiana            
K-Mart Plaza Lake Charles, LA 50.0% (1)(3) 225,148
 Albertsons Kmart, Dollar Tree, Planet Fitness
Southgate Lake Charles, LA 100.0% 
 155,789
 Market Basket Office Depot, Books-A-Million
Danville Plaza Monroe, LA 100.0% 
 136,368
 County Market Citi Trends, Surplus Warehouse
Louisiana Total:       517,305
    
Maryland            
Pike Center Washington, DC-VA-MD-WV 100.0% 
 80,841
 
 T.G.I. Friday's, Ethan Allen, Pier 1
Maryland Total:       80,841
    
Missouri            
Western Plaza St. Louis, MO-IL 50.0% (1)(3) 56,734
 
 Value Village
Missouri Total:       56,734
    
Nevada            
Best in the West Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 428,066
 
 Best Buy, T. J. Maxx, Babies "R" Us, Bed Bath & Beyond, Petsmart, Office Depot
Charleston Commons Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 367,544
 Walmart Ross Dress for Less, Office Max, 99 Cents Only, PetSmart
College Park S.C. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 195,367
 El Super Factory 2 U, CVS
Decatur 215 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 241,700
 (WinCo Foods) (Target), Hobby Lobby
Eastern Horizon Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 353,538
 Trader Joe's, (Kmart) 
Francisco Centre Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 148,815
 La Bonita Grocery (Ross Dress for Less), Fallas Paredes
Paradise Marketplace Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 152,672
 (Smith’s Food) Dollar Tree
Rainbow Plaza Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 273,916
 Albertsons Ross Dress for Less, JC Penney, Home Depot, 24 Hour Fitness
Rainbow Plaza, Phase I Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 136,339
 Albertsons Ross Dress for Less, JC Penney, Home Depot, 24 Hour Fitness
Rancho Towne & Country Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 161,837
 Smith’s Food 
Tropicana Beltway Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 617,821
 (Walmart Supercenter) (Lowe’s), Ross Dress for Less, PetSmart, Office Depot, Sports Authority
Tropicana Marketplace Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0%   142,643
 (Smith’s Food) Family Dollar
Westland Fair North Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 100.0% 
 598,213
 (Walmart Supercenter) (Lowe’s), PetSmart, Office Depot, Michaels, Anna's Linens
Nevada Total:       3,818,471
    
New Mexico            
Eastdale Albuquerque, NM 100.0% 
 119,091
 Albertsons Family Dollar
North Towne Plaza Albuquerque, NM 100.0% 
 139,996
 Whole Foods Market Home Goods
New Mexico Total:       259,087
    
North Carolina            
Galleria Charlotte-Gastonia et al, NC-SC 100.0% 
 328,276
 (Walmart Supercenter) Off Broadway Shoes
Whitehall Commons Charlotte-Gastonia et al, NC-SC 100.0% 
 444,803
 (Walmart Supercenter), (Publix) (Lowe's)
Bull City Market Durham, NC 100.0% 
 40,875
 Whole Foods Market 
Chatham Crossing Durham, NC 25.0% (1)(3) 96,155
 Lowes Foods CVS
Hope Valley Commons Durham, NC 100.0% 
 81,371
 Harris Teeter 
Avent Ferry Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 119,652
 Food Lion Family Dollar
Capital Square Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 143,063
 Food Lion 
Falls Pointe Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 198,549
 Harris Teeter (Kohl’s)
High House Crossing Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 90,155
 Harris Teeter 

18


Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
Leesville Town Centre Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 127,106
 Harris Teeter Rite Aid
Northwoods Market Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 77,802
 Walmart Neighborhood Market Dollar Tree
Six Forks Station Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 467,660
 Food Lion Kmart, Home Depot, Bed Bath & Beyond, PetSmart
Stonehenge Market Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0% 
 188,437
 Harris Teeter Stein Mart, Rite Aid
Surf City Crossing Wilmington, NC 100.0% 
 63,016
 Harris Teeter 
Waterford Village Wilmington, NC 100.0% 
 89,483
 Harris Teeter 
North Carolina Total:       2,556,403
    
Oklahoma            
Town and Country Oklahoma City, OK 100.0% 
 128,231
 
 Big Lots, Westlake Hardware, Aaron Rents
Oklahoma Total:       128,231
    
Oregon            
Clackamas Square Portland-Vancouver et al, OR-WA 20.0% (1)(3) 140,227
 (Winco Foods) T.J. Maxx
Oak Grove Market Center Portland-Vancouver et al, OR-WA 100.0% 
 97,177
 Safeway 
Raleigh Hills Plaza Portland-Vancouver et al, OR-WA 20.0% (1)(3) 39,520
 New Seasons Market Walgreens
Oregon Total:       276,924
    
South Carolina            
Fresh Market Shoppes Hilton Head Island-Beaufort, SC 25.0% (1)(3) 86,694
 The Fresh Market Dollar Tree
South Carolina Total:       86,694
    
Tennessee            
Bartlett Towne Center Memphis, TN-MS-AR 100.0% 
 192,624
 Kroger Petco, Dollar Tree, Shoe Carnival
Commons at Dexter Lake Memphis, TN-MS-AR 100.0% 
 178,558
 Kroger Stein Mart, Marshalls, HomeGoods
Commons at Dexter Lake Phase II Memphis, TN-MS-AR 100.0% 
 66,838
 Kroger Stein Mart, Marshalls, HomeGoods
Highland Square Memphis, TN-MS-AR 100.0%  (4) 14,490
 
 Walgreens
Mendenhall Commons Memphis, TN-MS-AR 100.0% 
 88,108
 Kroger 
Ridgeway Trace Memphis, TN-MS-AR 100.0% 
 307,727
 
 (Target), Best Buy, Sports Authority, PetSmart
Tennessee Total:       848,345
    
Texas            
Bell Plaza Amarillo, TX 15.0% (1) 130,631
 United Supermarket Dollar Tree
Mueller Regional Retail Center Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX100.0% 
 351,099
 
 Marshalls, PetSmart, Bed Bath & Beyond, Home Depot, Best Buy
North Park Plaza Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 302,460
 
 (Target), (Toys “R” Us), Anna's Linens, Spec's, Kirkland's
North Towne Plaza Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 100.0% 
 153,000
 
 (Lowe's)
Moore Plaza Corpus Christi, TX 100.0% 
 599,622
 (H-E-B) Office Depot, Marshalls, (Target), Old Navy, Hobby Lobby, Stein Mart
Boswell Towne Center Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 100.0% 
 88,008
 (Albertsons) 
Gateway Station Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 70.0% (1) 68,360
 
 Conn's
Lake Pointe Market Center Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 100.0% 
 121,689
 (Tom Thumb) (Walgreens)
Overton Park Plaza Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 100.0% 
 463,431
 Sprouts Farmers Market Sports Authority, PetSmart, T.J. Maxx, (Home Depot), Goody Goody Wines, Anna’s Linens, buybuy BABY
Preston Shepard Place Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 20.0% (1)(3) 361,832
 
 Babies "R" Us, Stein Mart, Nordstrom, Marshalls, Office Depot, Petco
10/Federal Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 132,472
 Sellers Bros. Palais Royal, Harbor Freight Tools
1919 North Loop West Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 138,058
 
 State of Texas
Alabama-Shepherd Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 59,120
 Trader Joe's PetSmart
Bellaire Boulevard Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 41,273
 Randall’s 
Blalock Market at I-10 Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 97,277
 99 Ranch Market 
Braeswood Square Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 104,778
 Belden’s Walgreens
Broadway Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 74,604
 
 Big Lots, Family Dollar
Centre at Post Oak Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 183,940
 
 Marshalls, Old Navy, Grand Lux Café, Nordstrom Rack, Arhaus
Citadel Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 121,000
 
 Weingarten Realty Investors Corporate Office
Cullen Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 84,517
 Fiesta Family Dollar
Cypress Pointe Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 283,381
 Kroger Babies “R” Us
Fiesta Village Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 30,249
 Fiesta 
Galveston Place Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 210,370
 Randall’s Office Depot, Palais Royal, Spec's
Glenbrook Square Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 77,890
 Kroger 
Griggs Road Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 80,116
 
 Family Dollar, Citi Trends
Harrisburg Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 93,438
 
 Fallas Paredes
HEB - Dairy Ashford & Memorial Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0%  (4) 36,874
 H-E-B 

19


Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
Heights Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 71,277
 Kroger 
Humblewood Shopping Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 279,226
 
 Conn’s, Walgreens, (Michaels), (DSW)
I-45/Telephone Rd. Center Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 171,599
 Sellers Bros. Famsa, Dollar Tree, Fallas Paredes
Lawndale Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 52,127
 
 LaMichoacana Meat Market, Family Dollar, 99 Cents Only
League City Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 126,990
 Kroger 
Little York Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 113,878
 Sellers Bros. Fallas Paredes
Lyons Avenue Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 67,629
 Fiesta Fallas Paredes
Market at Town Center Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 388,865
 
 Old Navy, Home Goods, Marshalls, Ross Dress for Less, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue OFF 5TH
Market at Westchase Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 84,084
 Whole Foods Market 
Northbrook Center Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 173,288
 Randall’s Office Depot, Citi Trends, Anna’s Linens, Dollar Tree
Oak Forest Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 151,324
 Kroger Ross Dress for Less, Dollar Tree, Petsmart
Palmer Plaza Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 195,231
 
 Dollar Tree
Randall's/Kings Crossing Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 126,397
 Randall’s CVS
Richmond Square Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 92,356
 
 Best Buy, Cost Plus
River Oaks East Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 71,265
 Kroger 
River Oaks West Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 247,673
 Kroger Barnes & Noble, Talbots, Ann Taylor, Gap, JoS. A. Bank
Shoppes at Memorial Villages Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 184,354
 
 Rexel
Shops at Kirby Drive Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 10,000
 
 Freebirds Burrito
Shops at Three Corners Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 70.0% (1) 277,871
 Fiesta Ross Dress for Less, PetSmart, Office Depot, Big Lots
Southgate Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 15.0% (1) 125,260
 Food-A-Rama CVS, Family Dollar, Palais Royal
Stella Link Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 70,087
 Sellers Bros. Spec’s
Tomball Marketplace Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 298,857
 
 (Academy), (Kohl's), Ross Dress For Less, Marshalls
Village Plaza at Bunker Hill Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 57.8% (1)(3) 490,734
 H-E-B PetSmart, Babies "R" Us, Academy, Nordstrom Rack
Westchase Center Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 360,793
 Whole Foods Market (Target), Ross Dress for Less, Golfsmith, Palais Royal, Petco
Westhill Village Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 100.0% 
 128,791
 
 Ross Dress for Less, Office Depot, 99 Cents Only, Anna’s Linens
Independence Plaza Laredo, TX 100.0% 
 347,302
 H-E-B TJ Maxx, Ross, Hobby Lobby, Petco, Ulta Beauty
North Creek Plaza Laredo, TX 100.0% 
 485,463
 (H-E-B) (Target), Marshalls, Old Navy, Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond
Plantation Centre Laredo, TX 100.0% 
 143,015
 H-E-B 
Las Tiendas Plaza McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 500,067
 
 (Target), Academy, Conn’s, Ross Dress for Less, Marshalls, Office Depot
Market at Nolana McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 243,821
 (Walmart Supercenter) 
Market at Sharyland Place McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 301,174
 (Walmart Supercenter) Kohl's, Dollar Tree
Northcross McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 74,865
 
 Barnes & Noble
Old Navy Building McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3)(4) 15,000
 
 Old Navy
Sharyland Towne Crossing McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 484,949
 H-E-B (Target), T.J. Maxx, Petco, Office Depot, Ross Dress for Less
South 10th St. HEB McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 103,702
 H-E-B 
Starr Plaza Rio Grande City, TX 50.0% (1)(3) 176,693
 H-E-B Bealls
Fiesta Trails San Antonio, TX 100.0% 
 482,370
 (H-E-B) (Target), Act III Theatres, Marshalls, Office Max, Stein Mart, Petco, Anna’s Linens
Parliament Square II San Antonio, TX 100.0% (4) 54,541
 
 Incredible Pizza
Thousand Oaks San Antonio, TX 15.0% (1) 162,009
 H-E-B Bealls, Tuesday Morning
Valley View San Antonio, TX 100.0% 
 91,544
 
 Marshalls, Dollar Tree
Broadway Tyler, TX 100.0% 
 60,447
 
 Stein Mart
Texas Total:       12,576,407
    
Utah            
DDS Office Building Salt Lake City, UT 100.0% 
 27,300
 
 
Taylorsville Town Center Salt Lake City, UT 100.0% 
 139,007
 The Fresh Market Rite Aid
West Jordan Town Center Salt Lake City, UT 100.0% 
 304,899
 
 (Target), Petco
Utah Total:       471,206
    
Washington            
Meridian Town Center Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 20.0% (1)(3) 143,012
 (Safeway) Jo-Ann Fabric & Craft Store, Tuesday Morning
Promenade 23 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 100.0% 
 96,860
 Red Apple Grocers Walgreens
Queen Anne Marketplace Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 51.0% (1)(3) 81,385
 Metropolitan Market Bartell's Drug
Rainer Square Plaza Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 20.0% (1)(3) 108,356
 Safeway Ross Dress for Less

20


Center 
CBSA (5)
 Owned % 
Foot
Notes  
 GLA 
Grocer Anchor
( ) indicates owned
by others
 
Other Anchors
( ) indicates owned by others
South Hill Center Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 20.0% (1)(3) 134,010
 
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Ross Dress for Less, Best Buy
Washington Total:       563,623
    
Total Operating Properties       45,064,945
    
New Development          
Maryland            
Nottingham Commons Baltimore-Towson, MD 100.0%  (2) 2,209
    
Maryland Total:       2,209
    
North Carolina            
Wake Forest Crossing II Raleigh-Cary, NC 100.0%  (2) 93,595
    
North Carolina Total:       93,595
    
Virginia            
Hilltop Village Washington, DC-VA-MD-WV 50.0% (1)(2) 130,876
    
Virginia Total:       130,876
    
Total New Developments     226,680
    
___________________
(1)Denotes property is held by a real estate joint venture or partnership; however, the gross leasable area square feet figures include our partners’ ownership interest in the property and property owned by others.
(2)Denotes property currently under development.
(3)Denotes properties that are not consolidated under generally accepted accounting principles.
(4)Denotes single tenant property.
(5)CBSA represents the Core Based Statistical Area.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various matters of litigation arising in the normal course of business. While we are unable to predict with certainty the amounts involved, our management and legal counsel believe that when such litigation is resolved, our resulting liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

2521


PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WRI.” As of January 31, 20132015, the number of holders of record of our common shares was 2,399.2,012. The closing high and low sale prices per common share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, and dividends per share paid for the fiscal quarters indicated were as follows:
High Low Dividends    High Low Dividends     
2012:     
2014:      
Fourth$28.19
 $25.81
 $.290
$36.96
 $31.79
 $.575
(1) 
Third28.85
 25.88
 .290
34.47
 31.28
 .325
 
Second27.53
 24.36
 .290
32.86
 30.13
 .325
 
First26.45
 21.56
 .290
31.09
 27.75
 .325
 
2011:     
2013:      
Fourth$23.95
 $19.35
 $.275
$32.44
 $27.42
 $.305
 
Third26.73
 19.39
 .275
32.69
 27.54
 .305
 
Second26.80
 23.64
 .275
35.84
 28.79
 .305
 
First25.87
 23.69
 .275
31.55
 27.35
 .305
 
___________________
(1)Comprised of a regular dividend of $.325 per common share and a special dividend of $.25 per common share.
The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which our common shares may be issued as of December 31, 20122014:
Plan category 
Number of 
shares to
be issued 
upon 
exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted 
average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Number of 
shares
remaining available
for future issuance
 
Number of 
shares to
be issued 
upon 
exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted 
average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Number of 
shares
remaining available
for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders 4,085,702 $28.98 1,885,315 2,897,123 $28.76 1,437,633
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders      
Total 4,085,702 $28.98 1,885,315 2,897,123 $28.76 1,437,633

2622

Table of Contents

Performance Graph
The graph and table below provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for us as compared with the S&P 500 Stock Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Shopping Centers Index, weighted by market value at each measurement point. The graph assumes that on December 31, 20072009, $100 was invested in our common shares and that all dividends were reinvested by the shareholder.
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Return
*$100 invested on December 31, 20072009 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright© 2013 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.Source: SNL Financial LC
2008 2009 2010 2011 20122010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Weingarten Realty Investors$71.68
 $75.37
 $95.04
 $91.40
 $117.20
$126.10
 $121.27
 $155.50
 $165.96
 $221.43
S&P 500 Index63.00
 79.67
 91.67
 93.61
 108.59
115.06
 117.49
 136.30
 180.44
 205.14
FTSE NAREIT Equity Shopping Centers Index61.16
 60.14
 78.65
 78.08
 97.62
130.78
 129.83
 162.31
 170.41
 221.47
There can be no assurance that our share performance will continue into the future with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph above. We do not make or endorse any predications as to future share performance.


2723

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data and should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and the financial schedules included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2010 2009 20082014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Operating Data: (1)
                  
Revenues (primarily real estate rentals)$503,538
 $478,357
 $471,284
 $486,557
 $505,683
$514,406
 $489,195
 $451,177
 $428,294
 $418,904
Depreciation and Amortization140,983
 131,350
 125,302
 122,852
 126,523
150,356
 146,763
 127,703
 118,890
 113,161
Impairment Loss9,982
 55,574
 33,317
 34,983
 52,539
1,024
 2,579
 9,585
 49,671
 33,317
Operating Income167,516
 120,436
 143,667
 156,348
 143,722
182,038
 159,868
 144,361
 103,314
 117,922
Interest Expense, net115,812
 139,717
 145,391
 149,265
 151,756
94,725
 96,312
 106,248
 130,298
 135,484
(Loss) Gain on Redemption of Convertible Senior
Unsecured Notes

 
 (135) 25,311
 12,961
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Joint Venture and
Partnership Interests
14,203
 
 
 
 
Gain on Land and Merchant Development Sales
 
 
 17,956
 8,361
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes(79) (146) 82
 (5,980) 10,542
Gain on Sale and Acquisition of Real Estate Joint
Venture and Partnership Interests
1,718
 33,670
 14,203
 
 
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Real Estate Joint
Ventures and Partnerships, net
22,317
 35,112
 (1,558) 7,834
 12,889
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes1,261
 (7,046) 75
 3
 297
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations72,187
 (6,531) 20,935
 61,340
 40,333
116,365
 132,977
 56,880
 (14,088) 5,307
Gain on Sale of Property1,034
 1,679
 2,005
 25,075
 1,998
146,290
 762
 1,004
 1,304
 2,005
Net Income152,421
 16,739
 51,238
 175,276
 154,595
307,579
 265,156
 152,421
 16,739
 51,238
Net Income Adjusted for Noncontrolling Interests146,640
 15,621
 46,206
 171,102
 145,652
288,008
 220,262
 146,640
 15,621
 46,206
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common
Shareholders
$109,210
 $(19,855) $10,730
 $135,626
 $109,091
$277,168
 $184,145
 $109,210
 $(19,855) $10,730
Per Share Data - Basic:                  
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Attributable to Common Shareholders
$0.25
 $(0.34) $(0.14) $0.43
 $(0.04)$1.91
 $0.76
 $0.13
 $(0.40) $(0.27)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common
Shareholders
$0.90
 $(0.17) $0.09
 $1.24
 $1.29
$2.28
 $1.52
 $0.90
 $(0.17) $0.09
Weighted Average Number of Shares120,696
 120,331
 119,935
 109,546
 84,474
121,542
 121,269
 120,696
 120,331
 119,935
Per Share Data - Diluted:                  
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Attributable to Common Shareholders
$0.25
 $(0.34) $(0.14) $0.42
 $(0.04)$1.89
 $0.75
 $0.13
 $(0.40) $(0.27)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common
Shareholders
$0.90
 $(0.17) $0.09
 $1.23
 $1.28
$2.25
 $1.50
 $0.90
 $(0.17) $0.09
Weighted Average Number of Shares121,705
 120,331
 120,780
 110,178
 84,917
Weighted Average Number of Shares - Diluted124,370
 122,460
 121,705
 120,331
 119,935
Balance Sheet Data:                  
Property (at cost)$4,399,850
 $4,688,526
 $4,777,794
 $4,658,396
 $4,915,472
$4,076,094
 $4,289,276
 $4,399,850
 $4,688,526
 $4,777,794
Total Assets4,184,784
 4,588,226
 4,807,855
 4,890,385
 5,114,212
3,814,094
 4,223,929
 4,184,784
 4,588,226
 4,807,855
Debt, net$2,204,030
 $2,531,837
 $2,589,448
 $2,531,847
 $3,148,636
$1,938,188
 $2,299,844
 $2,204,030
 $2,531,837
 $2,589,448
Other Data:                  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities$227,330
 $214,731
 $214,625
 $244,316
 $220,150
$240,769
 $233,992
 $227,330
 $214,731
 $214,625
Cash Flows from Investing Activities370,308
 (3,745) (121,421) 191,872
 (115,391)218,077
 134,654
 370,308
 (3,745) (121,421)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities(591,676) (221,203) (222,929) (341,550) (111,590)(527,233) (296,674) (591,676) (221,203) (222,929)
Cash Dividends per Common Share1.16
 1.10
 1.04
 1.28
 2.10
1.55
 1.22
 1.16
 1.10
 1.04
Funds from Operations - Basic (2)
$222,128
 $173,325
 $187,008
 $204,634
 $194,633
$254,518
 $222,732
 $222,128
 $173,325
 $187,008
___________________
(1)For all periods presented, the operating data related to continuing operations and gain on sale of property do not include the effects of amounts reported in discontinued operations.operations, and certain business combination transactions have occurred. See Note 15 and 23 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information.
(2)See Item 7 for the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts definition of funds from operations.

2824

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the comparative summary of selected financial data appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and trends which might appear should not be taken as indicative of future operations. Our results of operations and financial condition, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, are subject to management’s evaluation and interpretation of business conditions, retailer performance, changing capital market conditions and other factors which could affect the ongoing viability of our tenants.

Executive Overview
Weingarten Realty Investors is a REIT organized under the Texas Business Organizations Code. We, and our predecessor entity, began the ownership and development of shopping centers and other commercial real estate in 1948. Our primary business is leasing space to tenants in the shopping centers we own or lease. We also manage centersprovide property management services for which we charge fees to either joint ventures in whichwhere we are partners or for other outside owners for which we charge fees.owners.
We operate a portfolio of rental properties, primarily neighborhood and community shopping centers, that totalstotaling approximately 53.7 million45.3 million square feet of gross leasable area, that is either owned by us or others. We have a diversified tenant base with our largest tenant comprising only 3.2%3.5% of totalbase minimum rental revenues during 2012.2014.
Our long-term strategy is to focus on improving our core operations and increasing shareholder value. We accomplish this through hands-on leasing and management, selective redevelopment of the existing portfolio of properties, disciplined growth from strategic acquisitions and new developments, as well as dispositions of assets that no longer meet our ownership criteria. We remain committed to maintaining a conservatively leveraged balance sheet, a well-staggered debt maturity schedule and strong credit agency ratings.
Under our current capital recycling plan, we continue to dispose of non-core operating properties, which provides capital for growth opportunities and strengthens our operating fundamentals. During 2012, we have successfully disposed of $323.9 million of real estate assets, both directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships and excluding the industrial portfolio transaction referred to below. This program is ongoing, and we expect to complete dispositions in the range of $200 million to $300 million in 2013. We have approximately $73.5 million of dispositions currently under contracts or letters of intent; however, there are no assurances that these transactions will close. Upon the completion of this plan, we believe our remaining portfolio of shopping centers will be among the strongest in our sector.
In addition to the capital recycling plan described above, in May 2012, we sold a portfolio of wholly-owned industrial properties for a gross selling price of $382.4 million to DRA Fund VII LLC, an affiliate of DRA Advisors LLC. The portfolio consisted of 52 industrial properties, aggregating approximately 9.6 million square feet located in Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. Also, in 2012, our interest in 19 industrial properties, held in unconsolidated joint ventures in which we are a partner, were sold directly by the joint venture or through the sale of our interest. By exiting the industrial real estate market, we have successfully accomplished our goal of positioning ourselves as a REIT dedicated to the retail real estate market.
As we are generally selling lower tier, non-core assets, potential buyers looking to finance such acquisitions may find access to capital an issue. Even with these conditions, we continue to believe we will successfully execute our disposition plan; although further weaknesses in the secured lending markets or a downturn in the economy could impact our ability to execute this plan.
We will continue to actively seek acquisitions and new development opportunities to grow our operations. Despite the substantial competition for quality acquisition opportunities, we have been able to close on $232.3 million during 2012. We will continue to identify select properties that meet our return hurdles and to actively evaluate other opportunities as they enter the market. For 2013, we expect to invest in acquisitions and new developments in a range similar to our dispositions of $200 million to $300 million.

29

Table of Contents

We strive to maintain a strong, conservative capital structure which provides ready access to a variety of attractive long and short-term capital sources. We carefully balance lower cost short-term financing with long-term liabilities associated with acquired or developed long-term assets. The funds from the industrial transaction in May 2012 allowed us to significantly reduce our debt levels. Specifically, we paid off our $200 million term loan, a $115 million 5.3% fixed-rate medium term note and reduced amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility. Additionally, in October 2012, we issued $300 million of 3.38% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2022. This offering allowed us to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and our 3.95% convertible senior unsecured notes totaling $54.1 million. Also during 2012, we redeemed our 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares with a redemption value of $72.5 million. These transactions continue to strengthen our balance sheet and further enhance our access to various sources of capital. While the availability of capital has improved over the past year, there can be no assurance that favorable pricing and availability will not deteriorate in the future.
At December 31, 2012,2014, we owned or operated under long-term leases, either directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, a total of 292234 developed income-producing properties and twothree properties under various stages of construction and development. The total number of centers includes 288 neighborhood and community shopping centers and six other operating propertiesdevelopment, which are located in 21 states spanning the country from coast to coast.
We also owned interests in 3834 parcels of land held for development that totaled approximately 27.525.3 million square feet at December 31, 2012.2014.
We had approximately 6,8005,800 leases with 4,6003,800 different tenants at December 31, 2012.2014. Leases for our properties range from less than a year for smaller spaces to over 25 years for larger tenants. Rental revenues generally include minimum lease payments, which often increase over the lease term, reimbursements of property operating expenses, including real estate taxes, and additional rent payments based on a percentage of the tenants’ sales. Our anchor tenants are supermarkets, value-oriented apparel/discount stores and other retailers or service providers who generally sell basic necessity-type goods and services. Through this challenging economic environment, weWe believe the stability of our anchor tenants, combined with convenient locations, attractive and well-maintained properties, high quality retailers and a strong tenant mix, should ensure the long-term success of our merchants and the viability of our portfolio.
Retail Our goal is to remain a leader in owning and operating top-tier neighborhood and community shopping centers in certain markets of the U.S. We have completed the transformation of our portfolio outlined in 2011 by disposing non-core properties and reinvesting in high-quality centers supported by stronger demographics. Our strategic initiatives have now turned to: (1) raising net asset value and cash flow through quality acquisitions, redevelopments and new developments, (2) maintaining a strong, flexible consolidated balance sheet and a well-managed debt maturity schedule and (3) growing net operating income from our existing portfolio by increasing occupancy and rental rates. We believe these initiatives will keep our portfolio of properties among the strongest in our sector.
Under our capital recycling plan, we disposed of non-core operating properties, which provided capital for growth opportunities and strengthened our operating fundamentals. During 2014, we successfully disposed of real estate assets with our share of aggregate gross sales proceeds totaling $387 million, which were owned by us either directly or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships. Although the transformation process is complete, we will continue to recycle properties that no longer meet our ownership criteria with the magnitude of these dispositions significantly reduced when compared to activity over the past several years. We expect to complete dispositions in the range of $125 million to $175 million in 2015, but we can give no assurances that this will actually occur. We have approximately $63 million of dispositions currently under contracts or letters of intent; however, there are no assurances that these transactions will close. Subsequent to year-end, we sold two properties with gross proceeds totaling $25 million.
As we are generally selling lower-tier, non-core assets, potential buyers requiring financing for such acquisitions may find access to capital an issue, especially if long-term interest rates rise, but conditions are currently very good. We intend to continue to recycle capital according to our business plan, although a number of factors, including weaknesses in the secured lending markets or a downturn in the economy, could adversely impact our ability to execute this plan.

25

Table of Contents

We continue to actively seek acquisitions opportunities to grow our operations. Despite substantial competition for quality opportunities, we will continue to identify select acquisition properties that meet our return hurdles and to actively evaluate other opportunities as they enter the market. In 2014, we acquired a center in Arizona with a gross purchase price of $43.8 million. For 2015, we expect to invest in acquisitions in the range of $200 million to $250 million, but we can give no assurances that this will actually occur. Subsequent to year-end, we acquired one center in Texas with a gross purchase price of $43.1 million.
We continue to focus on identifying new development projects as another source of growth. Although we have only seen a few viable projects, a lack of supply in new retail space, combined with an increase in supermarket sales, has driven an increase in new development activity and retailer interest, which we believe is a positive trend. During 2014, we acquired two new development properties located in North Carolina and Maryland, with our expected investment in these properties to be approximately $62 million. Furthermore, we have a contractual commitment to purchase the retail portion of a mixed-use project in Washington from its developer, and our expected investment in this mixed-use project approximates $29 million. For 2015, we expect to invest in new developments in the range of $50 million to $100 million, but we can give no assurances that this will actually occur.
In addition, we continue to look for internal growth opportunities. Currently, we have 13 redevelopment projects in which we plan to invest approximately $67 million over the next 24 months. Additionally, in 2014 we completed one redevelopment project in a 50% unconsolidated real estate joint venture, which has added approximately 7,200 incremental square feet to to the total portfolio, with our share of the incremental investment totaling $.6 million. Upon completion, the average projected stabilized return on our incremental investment on these redevelopment projects is expected to range between 10% to 15%.
We strive to maintain a strong, conservative capital structure which should provide ready access to a variety of attractive long and short-term capital sources. We carefully balance lower cost short-term financing with long-term liabilities associated with acquired or developed long-term assets. During 2014, we repaid $315 million of medium term notes from the net proceeds of our $250 million issuance in October 2013 of 4.45% senior unsecured notes that had been previously invested in short-term investments of $50 million and cash and cash equivalents. Furthermore, in 2014, we redeemed the total outstanding principal amount of $100 million of our 8.1% senior unsecured notes, which was funded through our revolving credit facility. These transactions have decreased our interest costs by replacing high-cost debt with considerably lower rate debt.
We believe that these transactions should continue to strengthen our consolidated balance sheet and further enhance our access to various sources of capital, while reducing our cost of capital. While the availability of capital has improved over the past few years, there can be no assurance that favorable pricing and availability will not deteriorate in the future. The transformation of our operating portfolio and the continued strengthening of our consolidated balance sheet has been rewarded with a change in outlook to Positive from Stable by Moody’s Investor Services during 2014.
Operational Metrics
In assessing the performance of our shopping centers, management carefully monitors various operating metrics of the portfolio. As a result of our transformation initiative, strong leasing activity, low tenant fallout and lack of quality retail space in the market, the operating metrics of our portfolio strengthened in 2014 as we focused on increasing occupancy and same property net operating income ("SPNOI" and see Non-GAAP Financial Measures for additional information). Our portfolio delivered solid operating results with:
improved occupancy to 95.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014 over the same period of 2013 of 94.8%;
an increase of 3.4% in SPNOI for the year ended December 31, 2014 over the same period of 2013; and
rental rate increases of 13.1% for new leases and 9.3% for renewals during 2014.
Below are performance metrics associated with our signed occupancy, same property net operating income ("SPNOI")SPNOI growth and leasing activity on a pro rata basis.basis:
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Anchor (represents any tenant at least 10,000 square feet)97.1% 96.8%
Non-Anchor88.2% 86.7%
Total Occupancy93.7% 93.0%
 December 31,
 2014 2013
Anchor (space of 10,000 square feet or greater)98.9% 98.5%
Non-Anchor (small shop)89.8% 89.0%
Total Occupancy95.4% 94.8%

26

Table of Contents

 Three Months Ended
December 31, 2012
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2012
SPNOI Growth (1)
5.1% 4.2%
 Three Months Ended 
 December 31, 2014
 Twelve Months Ended 
 December 31, 2014
SPNOI Growth (1)
3.6% 3.4%
__________________________________
(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a definition of the measurement of SPNOI and a reconciliation to operating income within this section of Item 7.

30

Table of Contents

 
Number
of
Leases
 
Square
Feet ('000's)
 
Average
New
Rent per
Square
Foot ($)
 
Average
Prior
Rent per
Square
Foot ($)
 
Average Cost
of Tenant
Improvements
per Square
Foot ($)
 
Change in
Base Rent
on Cash
Basis
Leasing Activity:           
Three Months Ended December 31, 2012      
Retail new leases (1)
61
 122
 $18.04
 $18.04
 $11.87
 %
Retail renewals199
 590
 17.84
 16.33
 0.88
 9.3%
Not comparable spaces87
 255
 
 
 
 %
Total347
 967
 $17.87
 $16.62
 $2.76
 7.6%
            
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2012      
Retail new leases (1)
300
 750
 $17.11
 $16.75
 $16.59
 2.2%
Retail renewals867
 3,000
 15.93
 15.14
 0.21
 5.2%
Not comparable spaces292
 934
 
 
 
 %
Total1,459
 4,684
 $16.16
 $15.46
 $3.48
 4.5%
 
Number
of
Leases
 
Square
Feet
('000's)
 
Average
New
Rent per
Square
Foot ($)
 
Average
Prior
Rent per
Square
Foot ($)
 
Average Cost
of Tenant
Improvements
per Square
Foot ($)
 
Change in
Base Rent
on Cash
Basis
Leasing Activity:           
Three Months Ended December 31, 2014      
New leases (1)
54
 134
 $19.46
 $17.63
 $12.33
 10.4%
Renewals186
 682
 15.07
 13.53
 0.06
 11.4%
Not comparable spaces43
 162
 
 
 
 %
Total283
 978
 $15.79
 $14.20
 $2.07
 11.2%
            
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2014      
New leases (1)
236
 690
 $18.95
 $16.76
 $21.70
 13.1%
Renewals737
 2,737
 15.52
 14.20
 0.03
 9.3%
Not comparable spaces187
 700
 
 
 
 %
Total1,160
 4,127
 $16.21
 $14.72
 $4.39
 10.1%
__________________________________
(1)
Average external lease commissions per square foot for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20122014 were $3.50$4.18 and $3.23,$4.58, respectively.
The operating metrics of our portfolio strengthened in 2012 as the economy continued to stabilize, and we focused on increasing occupancy and SPNOI. Our portfolio delivered exceptional operating results with:
an increase in occupancy of .7% over 2011;
an increase of 1.5% in non-anchor shop (spaces less than 10,000 square feet) occupancy over 2011;
an increase of 4.2% in SPNOI over 2011; and
rental rate increases for 2012 of 4.5%, which includes an increase of 2.2% on new leases.
While we will continue to monitor the economy and the effects on our tenants, over the long-term we believe the significant diversification of our portfolio, both geographically and by tenant base, and the quality of our portfolio will allow us to further increase occupancy levels slightly; however, occupancy may oscillate over the next several quarters as we move through 2013, assuming no bankruptciescontinue to maximize our long-term portfolio value by multiple national or regional tenants.repositioning some of our anchor space. A stabilization in economic conditions and a reduction in quality retail space available contributed to the increase in overall rental rates on a same-space basis as we completed new leases and renewed existing leases. While we have achieved strong growth in both rental rates and SPNOI during 2012, maintaining this level of positive operating performance through 2013 is not assured. Leasing volume is anticipated to decline as we have less vacant space available for leasing and are experiencing reductions in tenant fallout.leasing. Our expectation is that SPNOI will average between 2.5% to 3.5% for 2015.
New Development
At December 31, 2012,2014, we had two properties in various stages of construction andfour projects under development. We have funded $58.3$82.8 million to date on these projects, and we estimate our aggregate net investment upon completion to be $97.2 million.$156.6 million. Overall, the average projected stabilized return on investment for these properties is expected to be approximately 7.9%7.7% upon completion.
We havehad approximately $121.3$103.3 million in land held for development at December 31, 2012.2014. While we are experiencing a greater interest than previous years from retailers and other market participants in our land held for development, opportunities for economically viable developments remain scarce. We intend to continue to pursue additional development and redevelopment opportunities in multiple markets; however, finding the right opportunities remains very challenging.
Acquisitions and Joint Ventures
Acquisitions are a key component of our long-term growth strategy. The availability of quality acquisition opportunities in the market remains sporadic. Competition forsporadic in our targeted markets. Intense competition, along with a decline in the highest qualityvolume of high-quality core properties is intense whichon the market, has in many cases driven pricing to pre-recession highs. We remain disciplined in approaching these opportunities, pursuing only those that provide appropriate risk-adjusted returns.

3127

Table of Contents

Dispositions
Dispositions are also a key component of our ongoing management process where we selectively prune properties from our portfolio that no longer meet our geographic or growth targets. Dispositions provide capital, which may be recycled into properties that haveare high barrier-to-entry locations within high growth metropolitan markets, and thus have higher long-term growth potential. Additionally, proceeds from dispositions may be used to reduce outstanding debt, further deleveraging our consolidated balance sheet. Over time, we expect this will produce a portfolio with higher occupancy rates and stronger revenue growth.
Our disposition program may be impacted by market pricing conditions and debt financing available to prospective purchasers. After specifically identifying potential disposition properties and analyzing current market data, we recognized an impairment charge of $8.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 on properties which we believe are either probable to sell or were sold as part of this initiative.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies require more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
To determine the method of accounting for partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships, management evaluates the characteristics of associated entities and determines whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and, if so, determines which party is the primary beneficiary by analyzing whether we have both the power to direct the entity’s significant economic activities and the obligation to absorb potentially significant losses or receive potentially significant benefits. Significant judgments and assumptions inherent in this analysis include the design of the entity structure, the nature of the entity’s operations, future cash flow projections, the entity’s financing and capital structure, and contractual relationships and terms. We consolidate a VIE when we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary.
Primary risks associated with our VIEs include the potential funding of the entities’ debt obligations or making additional contributions to fund the entities’ operations.
Partially owned, non variable interest real estate joint ventures and partnerships over which we have a controlling financial interest are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements. In determining if we have a controlling financial interest, we consider factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions, kick-out rights and substantive participating rights. Partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships where we do not have a controlling financial interest, but have the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method.
Management continually analyzes and assesses reconsideration events, including changes in the factors mentioned above, to determine if the consolidation treatment remains appropriate. Decisions regarding consolidation of partially owned entities frequently require significant judgment by our management. Errors in the assessment of consolidation could result in material changes to our consolidated financial statements.

32

Table of Contents

Property
Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the acquisition method and, accordingly, the results of operations of an acquired property are included in our results of operations from the date of acquisition. Estimates of fair values are based upon future cash flows and other valuation techniques in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Fair values are used to record the purchase price of acquired property among land, buildings on an “as if vacant” basis, tenant improvements, other identifiable intangibles and any goodwill or gain on purchase. Other identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include the effect of out-of-market leases, the value of having leases in place (“as is” versus “as if vacant” and absorption costs), out-of-market assumed mortgages and tenant relationships. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method, generally over estimated useful lives of 40 years for buildings and over the lease term which includes bargain renewal options for other identifiable intangible assets. The impact of these estimates, including incorrect estimates in connection with acquisition values and estimated useful lives, could result in significant differences related to the purchased assets, liabilities and resulting depreciation or amortization. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
To determine the method of accounting for partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships, management evaluates the characteristics of associated entities and determines whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and, if so, determines which party is the primary beneficiary by analyzing whether we have both the power to direct the entity’s significant economic activities and the obligation to absorb potentially significant losses or receive potentially significant benefits. Significant judgments and assumptions inherent in this analysis include the design of the entity structure, the nature of the entity’s operations, future cash flow projections, the entity’s financing and capital structure, and contractual relationships and terms. We consolidate a VIE when we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary.
Primary risks associated with our VIEs include the potential funding of the entities’ debt obligations or making additional contributions to fund the entities’ operations.
Partially owned, non-variable interest real estate joint ventures and partnerships over which we have a controlling financial interest are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements. In determining whether we have a controlling financial interest, we consider factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions, kick-out rights and substantive participating rights. Partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships where we do not have a controlling financial interest, but have the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method.
Management continually analyzes and assesses reconsideration events, including changes in the factors mentioned above, to determine if the consolidation treatment remains appropriate. Decisions regarding consolidation of partially owned entities frequently require significant judgment by our management. Errors in the assessment of consolidation could result in material changes to our consolidated financial statements.

28

Table of Contents

Impairment
Our property is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property, including any capitalized costs and any identifiable intangible assets, may not be recoverable.
If such an event occurs, a comparison is made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each such property into the foreseeable future, with consideration of applicable holding periods, on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If we determine the carrying amount is not recoverable, our basis in the property is reduced to its estimated fair value to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. Fair values are determined by management utilizing cash flow models, market capitalization and discount rates, or by obtaining third-party broker or appraisal estimates in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy.
We review current economic considerations each reporting period, including the effects of tenant bankruptcies, the suspension of tenant expansion plans for new development projects, declines in real estate values and any changes to plans related to our new development projects including land held for development, to identify properties where we believe market values may be deteriorating. Determining whether a property is impaired and, if impaired, the amount of write-down to fair value requires a significant amount of judgment by management and is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation. The evaluations used in these analyses could result in incorrect estimates when determining carrying values that could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Our investment in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is reviewed for impairment each reporting period. The ultimate realization is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the estimated fair value of an investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary. A considerable amount of judgment by our management is used in this evaluation. Our overall future plans for the investment, our investment partner’s financial outlook and our views on current market and economic conditions may have a significant impact on the resulting factors analyzed for these purposes.
Our investments in tax increment revenue bonds are reviewed for impairment, including the evaluation of changes in events or circumstances that may indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. Realization is dependent on a number of factors, including investment performance, market conditions and payment structure. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the value of the investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary, recovery of its cost basis is uncertain, and/or it is uncertain if the investment will be held to maturity. A considerable amount of judgment by our management is used in this evaluation, which may produce incorrect estimates that could be material to our consolidated financial statements.


33

Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20122014 to the Year Ended December 31, 20112013
The following table is a summary of certain items from our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and Comprehensive Income, which we believe represent items that significantly changed during 20122014 as compared to the same period in 20112013:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 Change % Change
Revenues$503,538
 $478,357
 $25,181
 5.3%
Depreciation and amortization140,983
 131,350
 9,633
 7.3
Operating expenses98,426
 89,998
 8,428
 9.4
Impairment loss9,982
 55,574
 (45,592) (82.0)
Interest expense, net115,812
 139,717
 (23,905) (17.1)
Gain on sale of real estate joint venture and
partnership interests
14,203
 
 14,203
 
Equity in (losses) earnings of real estate joint
ventures and partnerships, net
(1,558) 7,834
 (9,392) (119.9)
Gain on acquisition1,869
 
 1,869
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 Change % Change
Revenues$514,406
 $489,195
 $25,211
 5.2%
Interest expense, net94,725
 96,312
 (1,587) (1.6)
Interest and other income, net3,756
 7,685
 (3,929) (51.1)
Gain on sale and acquisition of real estate joint
venture and partnership interests
1,718
 33,670
 (31,952) (94.9)
Equity in earnings of real estate joint
ventures and partnerships, net
22,317
 35,112
 (12,795) (36.4)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes1,261
 (7,046) 8,307
 117.9
Revenues
The increase in revenues of $25.2 million is primarily attributable to an increase in net rental revenues of $27.1from acquisitions and new development completions, which contributed $18.7 million, associated withas well as increases in occupancy and rental rates, revenuewhich is offset by our dispositions in the third and fourth quarters of 2014.


29

Table of Contents

Interest Expense, net
Net interest expense decreased $1.6 million or 1.6%. The components of net interest expense were as follows (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013
Gross interest expense$98,973
 $108,333
Over-market mortgage adjustment(946) (9,618)
Capitalized interest(3,302) (2,403)
Total$94,725
 $96,312
Gross interest expense totaled $99.0 million in 2014, down $9.4 million or 8.6% from new development completions2013. The decrease in gross interest expense is primarily attributable to a reduction in both the weighted average debt outstanding and interest rates as a result of $4.2the repayment of notes through the revolving credit facility, disposition proceeds and short-term investments from the October 2013 note issuance, all of which totaled $11.6 million. In 2014, the weighted average debt outstanding was $2.08 billion at a weighted average interest rate of 4.65% as compared to $2.14 billion outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 5.06% in 2013. Offsetting this decrease is a $1.2 million write-off of debt costs in 2014 associated with the redemption of the 8.1% senior unsecured notes. The decrease in the over-market mortgage adjustment of $8.7 million is primarily attributable to a $9.7 million write-off in 2013 of an above-market mortgage intangible from the early payoff of the associated mortgage.
Interest and Other Income, net
The decrease of $3.9 million is attributable primarily a $2.0 million decrease in the fair value of assets held in a grantor trust related to our deferred compensation plan and the repayment of various notes receivable.
Gain on Sale and Acquisition of Real Estate Joint Venture and Partnership Interests
The decrease of $32.0 million is attributable to the gains in 2013 associated with the liquidation of an unconsolidated real estate joint venture that owned industrial properties of $11.5 million and the acquisition of four shopping centersan unconsolidated real estate joint venture interest totaling $20.2 million.
Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and other propertyPartnerships, net
The decrease of $12.8 million is primarily attributable to a decrease in 2012, includingthe gain on sales from the 2014 and 2013 dispositions, of which our share totaled $11.0 million and the purchase of a 79.6%50% equity interest in December 2013.
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes
The increase of $8.3 million is primarily attributable to the tax effect of the gain in 2013 associated with the purchase of a 50% unconsolidated joint venture interest and two propertiesby our taxable REIT subsidiary.

30

Table of Contents

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2013 to the Year Ended December 31, 2012
The following table is a summary of certain items from our Consolidated Statements of Operations, which we believe represent items that significantly changed during 2013 as compared to the same period in 2011, which totaled $11.82012:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 Change % Change
Revenues$489,195
 $451,177
 $38,018
 8.4%
Depreciation and amortization146,763
 127,703
 19,060
 14.9
Operating expenses97,099
 88,924
 8,175
 9.2
Real estate taxes, net57,515
 52,066
 5,449
 10.5
Impairment loss2,579
 9,585
 (7,006) (73.1)
General and administrative expenses25,371
 28,538
 (3,167) (11.1)
Interest expense, net96,312
 106,248
 (9,936) (9.4)
Gain on sale and acquisition of real estate joint
venture and partnership interests
33,670
 14,203
 19,467
 137.1
Equity in earnings (losses) of real estate joint
ventures and partnerships, net
35,112
 (1,558) 36,670
 2,353.7
(Provision) benefit for income taxes(7,046) 75
 (7,121) (9,494.7)
Revenues
The increase in revenues of $38.0 million is primarily attributable to an increase in revenue. Offsetting this net rental revenue increase is a decreaserevenues of $37.3 million due primarily to increases in other incomeoccupancy and rental rates, new development completions of $1.9$2.4 million which was attributable to a decline in miscellaneous revenue.and acquisitions of $18.7 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
The increase of $9.6$19.1 million is dueprimarily attributable to acquisitions, new development completions the acquisition of four shopping centers in 2012 and two shopping centers in 2011 and other capital activities.
Operating Expenses
The increase in operating expenses of $8.4$8.2 million is primarily attributable to acquisitions, which totaled $2.7 million, an increase in management fees of $3.2$2.1 million which results primarily fromattributable to a fair value increase in the assets held in a grantor trust related to our deferred compensation plan;plan of $1.1 million and a $1.2 millionslight increase in acquisition costs and another operating expenses at our existing properties.
Real Estate Taxes, net
The increase in overall operating expenses,real estate taxes, net of which$5.4 million is primarily attributable to rate and valuation changes, as well as acquisitions and new development completions totaled $1.5 million and $.5 million, respectively.completions.
Impairment Loss
The decrease in impairment loss of $7.0 million is primarily attributable to the $6.6 million loss in 2012 of $10.0 million is mainly attributable to three properties being marketed for sale during the year,associated with an equity interest in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture that ownsowned industrial propertiesproperties.
General and the saleAdministrative Expenses
The decrease in general and administrative expenses of unimproved land parcels. The impairment loss$3.2 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in 2011 of $55.6 million related primarilypersonnel due to land held for development, properties that were sold or marketed for sale, our equity interestattrition and property dispositions and a decrease in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and the net credit loss on the exchange of tax increment revenue bonds.share-based compensation associated with retirement eligible employees.

3431

Table of Contents

Interest Expense, net
Net interest expense decreased $23.9$9.9 million or 17.1%9.4%. The components of net interest expense were as follows (in thousands): 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 20112013 2012
Gross interest expense$121,594
 $142,605
$108,333
 $111,673
Amortization of convertible bond discount
 1,334
Over-market mortgage adjustment(2,657) (1,893)(9,618) (2,300)
Capitalized interest(3,125) (2,329)(2,403) (3,125)
Total$115,812
 $139,717
$96,312
 $106,248
Gross interest expense totaled $121.6$108.3 million in 2012,2013, down $21.0$3.3 million or 14.7%3.0% from 2011.2012. The decrease in gross interest expense results primarily from a reduction in both interest rates and the weighted average debt outstanding and interest rates as a result of refinancing of notes and mortgages through the revolving credit facility by means ofwith proceeds from the industrial and retail dispositions and the issuance of $300 million of 3.38% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2022.note issuances. In 2012,2013, the weighted average debt outstanding was $2.3$2.14 billion at a weighted average interest rate of 5.1%5.06% as compared to $2.6$2.18 billion outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 5.5%5.12% in 2011.2012. The amortizationincrease in the over-market mortgage adjustment of convertible bond discount ceased$7.3 million is attributable to the write-off of net above-market mortgage intangibles associated with the early payoff of the related mortgage in July 2011.both 2013 and 2012.
Gain on Sale and Acquisition of Real Estate Joint Venture and Partnership Interests
The increase of $14.2 milliongain in 2013 is attributable to the liquidation of an unconsolidated real estate joint venture that owned industrial properties of $11.5 million, the acquisition of an unconsolidated real estate joint venture interest totaling $20.2 million and the sale of an interest in four unconsolidated real estate joint ventures of $1.9 million, while the gain in 2012 was associated with the sale of an interest in six unconsolidated real estate joint ventures during 2012.ventures.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net
The decreaseincrease of $9.4$36.7 million is attributable to the reductiongain on sale from 2013 dispositions, of earnings fromwhich our unconsolidated real estate investments as a resultshare totaled $16.0 million and our share of impairment losses. Inlosses recorded in 2012, impairment losseswhich totaled $19.9 million as compared to $7.0 million in 2011.million.
Gain on Acquisition(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
The increasedecrease of $1.9$7.1 million is primarily attributable to the realization upon consolidationtax effect of our equitythe gain in 2013 associated with the purchase of a 79.6%50% unconsolidated joint venture interest.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2011 to the Year Ended December 31, 2010
The following table is a summary of certain items frominterest by our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, which we believe represent items that significantly changed during 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2011 2010 Change % Change
Revenues$478,357
 $471,284
 $7,073
 1.5%
Depreciation and amortization131,350
 125,302
 6,048
 4.8
Impairment loss55,574
 33,317
 22,257
 66.8
Interest expense, net139,717
 145,391
 (5,674) (3.9)
Interest and other income, net5,062
 9,823
 (4,761) (48.5)
Equity in earnings of real estate joint
ventures and partnerships, net
7,834
 12,889
 (5,055) (39.2)
Revenues
The increase in revenues of $7.1 million is attributable to an increase in net rental revenues of $5.5 million associated primarily with the acquisition of four properties in the latter half of 2010 and two properties in 2011, as well as new development completions.
Depreciation and Amortization
The increase of $6.0 million is primarily attributable to the acquisition of four properties in the latter half of 2010 and two properties in 2011, new development completions and other capital activities.

35

Table of Contents

Impairment Loss
The impairment loss in 2011 of $55.6 million related primarily to land held for development, properties that were sold or marketed for sale, our equity interest in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and the net credit loss on the exchange of tax increment revenue bonds. The 2010 impairment loss of $33.3 million was attributable to losses associated with the revaluation of two unconsolidated real estate joint ventures to fair value and its associated tax increment revenue bonds and a note, land held for development and the disposition of a retail building and an undeveloped land tract.
Interest Expense, net
Net interest expense is down $5.7 million or 3.9% from 2010. The components of net interest expense were as follows (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2011 2010
Gross interest expense$142,605
 $149,118
Amortization of convertible bond discount1,334
 2,191
Over-market mortgage adjustment(1,893) (2,513)
Capitalized interest(2,329) (3,405)
Total$139,717
 $145,391
Gross interest expense totaled $142.6 million in 2011, down $6.5 million or 4.4% from 2010. The decrease in gross interest expense was due primarily to the reduction in interest rates as a result of amending and extending our revolving credit facility and refinancing notes and mortgages through the revolving credit facility. In 2011, the weighted average debt outstanding was $2.6 billion at a weighted average interest rate of 5.5% as compared to $2.5 billion outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 6.0% in 2010. Capitalized interest decreased $1.1 million as a result of new development stabilizations and completions.
Interest and Other Income, net
The decrease of $4.8 million or 48.5% is primarily attributable to the fair value decrease of $1.5 million in the assets held in a grantor trust related to our deferred compensation plan, a decline of $.8 million in interest earned on notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships associated primarily with the consolidation of two unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, and a $1.9 million reduction in interest associated with our investment in subordinated tax increment revenue bonds.
Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net
The decrease of $5.1 million or 39.2% is primarily attributable to an increase in impairment losses in 2011, associated primarily with reduced holding periods at finite life joint ventures, which is offset by earnings from our 57.8% investment in a shopping center acquired in the fourth quarter of 2010.taxable REIT subsidiary.
Effects of Inflation
We have structured our leases in such a way as to remain largely unaffected should significant inflation occur. Most of the leases contain percentage rent provisions whereby we receive increased rentals based on the tenants’ gross sales. Many leases provide for increasing minimum rental rates during the terms of the leases through escalation provisions. In addition, many of our leases are for terms of less than 10 years, allowing us to adjust rental rates to changing market conditions when the leases expire. Most of our leases also require the tenants to pay their proportionate share of operating expenses and real estate taxes. As a result of these lease provisions, increases in operating expenses due to inflation, as well as real estate tax rate increases, generally do not have a significant adverse effect upon our operating results as they are absorbed by our tenants. Under the current economic climate, little to no inflation is occurring.
Economic Conditions
Underlying economic fundamentals continue to show positive, albeit slow, gains as the economic recovery continues to stabilize. Consumer confidence continues to fluctuate, although it is generally positive as oil prices decline and the labor market improves. Furthermore, personal income and housing prices are continuing to increase in our primary markets. We believe there is a direct correlation between housing wealth and consumption, and we expect rebounding home prices will further strengthen retail fundamentals, including rent growth and net operating income. Our focus on supermarket-anchored centers in densely populated major metropolitan areas should position our portfolio to capitalize on the improving retail landscape.

32

Table of Contents

With respect to Houston and other markets that are energy dependent, the reduction in oil prices will likely have a negative impact on the local economy and depending upon the duration of the low oil price environment, could impact the performance of our centers. However, our transformation strategy resulted in the sale of most of our lower quality assets in Houston and other energy dependent markets, which we believe reduces the potential negative impact of the low oil prices to us.
As strengthening retail fundamentals drive demand for investments in top-tier retail real estate, we continue to dedicate internal resources to identify and evaluate available assets in our markets so that we may purchase the best assets and properties with the strongest upside potential. Also, we continue to look for redevelopment opportunities within our existing portfolio by repositioning our anchor tenants and new development opportunities to spur growth.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our primary operating liquidity needs are paying our common and preferred dividends, maintaining and operating our existing properties, paying our debt service costs, excluding debt maturities, and funding capital expenditures. Under our 20132015 business plan, cash flows from operating activities are expected to meet these planned capital needs.

36

Table of Contents

The primary sources of capital for funding any debt maturities, acquisitions and acquisitionsnew development are our excess cash flow generated by our operating properties; credit facilities; proceeds from both secured and unsecured debt issuances; proceeds from common and preferred equity issuances; and cash generated from the sale of property and the formation of joint ventures; and cash flow generated by our operating properties.ventures. Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are retired as needed with proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, common and preferred equity, cash generated from the disposition of properties and cash flow generated by our operating properties.
As of December 31, 2012,2014, we had an available balanceborrowing capacity of $467.6$306.8 million under our revolving credit facility, and our debt maturities for 20132015 total $349.1$225.9 million. In 2012, we issued $300We repaid $315 million of 3.38%medium term notes during 2014 from the net proceeds of our $250 million issuance in October 2013 of 4.45% senior unsecured notes maturingthat previously had been invested in 2022. Proceeds from this offering allowed us to reduce amountsshort-term investments of $50 million and cash and cash equivalents. Additionally in 2014, we redeemed the total outstanding underprincipal amount of $100 million of our 8.1% senior unsecured notes, which was funded through our revolving credit facility and to repay our 3.95% convertible senior unsecured notes totaling $54.1 million. We also redeemed our 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Sharesfacility.
Currently, we are in negotiations associated with a redemption value$200 million unsecured five-year term note and a ten-year extension of $72.5 million.an existing $66 million secured note, which are anticipated to close by the first quarter of 2015. The fundingproceeds of this redemption was under our revolving credit facility.the term note will be used for general corporate purposes, and the interest rate associated with the existing secured note is anticipated to be reduced by 3.9% to 3.5% with approximately $6.1 million of debt extinguishment costs being realized.
We believe proceeds from the transactions above and our dispositioncapital recycling program, combined with our available capacity under the credit facilities, will provide adequate liquidity to fund our capital needs, including acquisitions and new development activities. In the event our dispositioncapital recycling program does not progress as expected, we believe other debt and equity alternatives are available to us. Although external market conditions are not within our control, we do not currently foresee any reasonsreason that would prevent us from entering the capital markets if needed.
During 2012, we have received2014, aggregate gross sales proceeds of $706.3 million related to dispositions. These proceeds were used primarily to repayfrom our $200 million unsecured term loan, matured fixed-rate medium term notes, and to fund $232.3 million in acquisitions.dispositions totaled $387.4 million. Operating cash flows from discontinued operations are included in net cash from operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, while proceeds from discontinued operations are included as investing activities. At December 31, 2012,2014, discontinued operations represent 10.3%.4% of our net cash from operating activities, and we would expect future net cash from operating activities to decrease accordingly when compared to prior periods. This is representative of our centers that were classified as discontinued operations or held for sale prior to April 1, 2014, our adoption date for the new qualification criteria for discontinued operations.

33

Table of Contents

We have non-recourse debt secured by acquired or developed properties held in several of our real estate joint ventures and partnerships. Off balanceOff-balance sheet mortgage debt for our unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and partnerships totaled $468.8$380.8 million,, of which our pro rata ownership percentage is $178.7$156.2 million, at December 31, 2012.2014. Scheduled principal mortgage payments on this debt, excluding non-cash related items totaling $1.3$1.1 million,, at 100% are as follows (in millions): 
2013$35.1
2014108.9
201540.9
$77.6
201697.1
110.9
201756.3
56.8
20186.3
20196.6
Thereafter129.2
121.5
Total$467.5
$379.7
We hedge the future cash flows of certain debt transactions, as well as changes in the fair value of our debt instruments, principally through interest rate contracts with major financial institutions. We generally have the right to sell or otherwise dispose of our assets except in certain cases where we are required to obtain our joint venture partners’ consent or a third party consent for assets held in special purpose entities whichthat are 100% owned by us.
Investing Activities:
Acquisitions
During 20122014, we acquired fourone shoppingcenter in Arizona with a gross purchase price of $43.8 million.
Dispositions
During 2014, we sold 30 centers and other property, for approximately $232.3 million, which includes the acquisition of a partner's 79.6%including real estate assets through our interest in an unconsolidated tenancy-in-common arrangement.
Dispositions
During 2012, we sold 27 shopping centers, 73 industrial properties and other retail property, either directly or through our interests in real estate joint ventures and partnerships. We also sold sixpartnerships, and we partially disposed of an unconsolidated real estate joint venture interests and assigned a 75% consolidated joint venture interest to a partner. Aggregateinterest. Our share of aggregate gross sales proceeds including the assumption of debt from these transactions totaled $706.3$387.4 million and generated our share of the gains of $84.9approximately $174.2 million.

37

TableDuring 2014, we completed the dissolution of Contentsour consolidated real estate joint venture with Hines, in which we owned a 30% interest. This joint venture held a portfolio of 13 centers located in Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida and North Carolina. The transaction was completed through the distribution of five centers to us, resulting in an increase to our equity of $11.0 million, and eight centers to Hines. The centers distributed to Hines were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2013, and we realized a $23.3 million gain in discontinued operations associated with this transaction.

New Development
At December 31, 2012,2014, we had twofour projects under various stages of construction and development with a total square footage of approximately .6.7 million,. Overall, of which we have funded $82.8 million to date on these projects. Upon completion, we expect our aggregate net investment in these properties upon completion to be $97.2 million.$156.6 million.
Our new development projects are financed initiallygenerally under our revolving credit facility, as it is our general practice not to use third party construction financing. Management monitors amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and periodically pays down such balances using cash generated from operations, from debt issuances, from common and preferred share issuances and from dispositionsthe disposition of properties.

34

Table of Contents

Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures for additions to the existing portfolio, acquisitions, tenant improvements, new development and our share of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and partnerships are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended
December 31, 2012
2014 2013
Acquisitions$204,180
$43,587
 $129,719
New Development47,402
 19,264
Tenant Improvements40,594
24,432
 33,259
New Development29,479
Redevelopment3,623
Other26,157
Capital Improvements15,202
 13,312
Other (includes redevelopments)14,681
 10,092
Total$304,033
$145,304
 $205,646
The decrease in capital expenditures is attributable primarily to a decline in acquisition activity offset by the increase in new development activity during 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
For 2013,2015, we anticipate our acquisitions to total between $175$200 million and $225$250 million. We anticipate our 20132015 tenant improvement expenditures to be comparableconsistent with 2012.2014. Our new development investment for 20132015 is estimated to be approximately $25$50 million to $75$100 million. For 2015, capital improvement spending is expected to be consistent with 2014 expenditures. No assurances can be provided that our planned capital activities will occur. Further, we have entered into commitments aggregating $58.3$64.3 million comprised principally of construction contracts which are generally due in 12 to 36 months and anticipated to be funded under our revolving credit facility.
Capital expenditures for additions described above relate to cash flows from investing activities as follows(in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013
Acquisition of real estate and land$43,587
 $105,765
Development and capital improvements100,926
 76,992
Real estate joint ventures and partnerships - Investments791
 22,600
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and
partnerships - Advances for capital expenditures

 289
Total$145,304
 $205,646
Capitalized soft costs, including payroll and other general and administrative costs, interest and real estate taxes, totaled $10.7 million and $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Financing Activities:
Debt
Total debt outstanding was $2.2$1.9 billion at December 31, 20122014 and included $2.0$1.7 billion on which bears interest at fixed rates are fixed and $211.4$286.2 million,, including the effect of $118.1$65.3 million of interest rate contracts, which bears interest at variable rates. Additionally, of our total debt, $933.3$595.0 million was secured by operating properties while the remaining $1.3$1.3 billion was unsecured.
WeAt December 31, 2014, we have a $500$500 million unsecured revolving credit facility which expires in September 2015April 2017 and provides borrowing rates that float at a margin over LIBOR plus a facility fee. TheAt December 31, 2014, the borrowing margin and facility fee, which are priced off a grid that is tied to our senior unsecured credit ratings, are currently 125were 115 and 2520 basis points, respectively. The facility also contains a competitive bid feature that will allowallows us to request bids for up to $250 million.$250 million. Additionally, an accordion feature allows us to increase the facility amount up to $700 million.$700 million. As of February 15, 2013,January 31, 2015, we had $115.0$207.0 million amounts outstanding, and the available balance was $382.6$288.8 million,, net of $2.4$4.2 million in outstanding letters of credit.

35

Table of Contents

We also havehad an agreement with a bank for an unsecured and uncommitted overnight facility totaling $99$99 million that we maintainmaintained for cash management purposes. The facility providesprovided for fixed interest rate loans at a 30 day30-day LIBOR rate plus a borrowing margin based on market liquidity. As of February 15, 2013, we had $19.8 million amounts outstanding underJanuary 2, 2015, this facility.facility was canceled and has not been replaced.
During 2012,For the year ended December 31, 2014, the maximum balance and weighted average balance outstanding under both facilities combined were $303.1$270.0 million and $157.4$151.0 million,, respectively, at a weighted average interest rate of 1.3%.8%.
We used the proceedsDuring 2014, we repaid $315 million of medium term notes from the salenet proceeds of our wholly-owned industrial properties to pay off$250 million issuance in October 2013 of 4.45% senior unsecured notes that had been previously invested in short-term investments of $50 million and cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, in 2014, we redeemed the total outstanding principal amount of $100 million of our $200 million term loan, a $115 million 5.3% fixed-rate medium term note that matured in May 2012, and reduced amounts outstanding under8.1% senior unsecured notes, which was funded through our $500 million revolving credit facility.
In 2012, we issued $300 million of 3.38% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2022. This offering allowed us to reduce amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and were used to repay our 3.95% convertible senior unsecured notes totaling $54.1 million.

38

Table of Contents

Our five most restrictive covenants include debt to assets, secured debt to assets, fixed charge and unencumbered interest coverage and debt yield ratios. We believe we were in full complianceare not aware of any non-compliance with our public debt and revolving credit facility covenants as of December 31, 2012.2014.
Our most restrictive public debt covenant ratios, as defined in our indenture and supplemental indenture agreements, were as follows at December 31, 2012:2014:
Covenant Restriction Actual
Debt to Asset Ratio Less than 60.0% 43.6%41.7%
Secured Debt to Asset Ratio Less than 40.0% 18.5%12.8%
Annual Service Charge Ratio Greater than 1.5 3.13.7
Unencumbered Asset Test Greater than 150% 250.6%253.0%
At December 31, 2012,2014, we had fourtwo interest rate contracts, maturing through October 2017, with an aggregate notional amount of $118.1$65.3 million that were designated as fair value hedges and convert fixed interest payments at rates ranging from 4.2% to of 7.5% to variable interest payments ranging from .3%4.2% to 4.3%.
We also have threeAt December 31, 2014, we had one interest rate contractscontract with an aggregate notional amount of $26.5$5.2 million that werewas designated as a cash flow hedges. These contracts have maturities through September 2017hedge. This contract matures in December 2015 and either fix or capfixes interest rates ranging from 2.3% to 5.0%at 2.4%. We have determined that these contracts arethis contract is highly effective in offsetting future variable interest cash flows.
We could be exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by the counter-parties related to our interest rate contracts; however, management believes such nonperformance is unlikely.
Equity
In February 2013,2015, our Board of Trust Managers approved an increase in our quarterly2015 first quarter dividend rate for our common shares from $.290.325 to $.305$.345 per share commencing with the first quarter 2013 distribution.share. Common and preferred dividends paid totaled $173.2$199.3 million during 20122014. During 2014, we paid a special dividend for our common shares in the amount of $.25 per share, which was due to the significant gains on dispositions of property. Our dividend payout ratio (as calculated as dividends paid on common shares divided by funds from operations (“FFO”) - basic) for the year ended 2012December 31, 2014 was approximately 63.3%, which is inclusiveapproximated 74.5%. FFO - basic for the year ended December 31, 2014 included the following non-cash transactions; the write-off of non-cash transactions including impairment chargesnet debt costs, deferred tax benefit adjustments and other non-cash items.
In November 2012, we redeemed Excluding the special dividend paid, our 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares with a redemption value of $72.5 million. The funding of this redemption was under our revolving credit facility.
Ondividend payout ratio would have been 62.5% for the year ended February 14, 2013, we called our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares with a redemption value of $75.0 million, which will settle on March 18, 2013December 31, 2014.
We have an effective universal shelf registration statement which expires in October 2014.September 2017. We will continue to closely monitor both the debt and equity markets and carefully consider our available financing alternatives, including both public offerings and private placements.

3936

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations
We have debt obligations related to our mortgage loans and unsecured debt, including any draws on our credit facilities. We have shopping centers that are subject to non-cancelable long-term ground leases where a third party owns and has leased the underlying land to us to construct and/or operate a shopping center. In addition, we have non-cancelable operating leases pertaining to office space from which we conduct our business. The table below excludes obligations related to our new development projects because such amounts are not fixed or determinable, and commitments aggregating $58.3$64.3 million comprised principally of construction contracts which are generally due in 12 to 36 months. The following table summarizes our primary contractual obligations as of December 31, 20122014 (in thousands):
                          
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total
Mortgages and Notes
Payable (1)
                          
Unsecured Debt$233,754
 $347,559
 $117,430
 $167,639
 $44,675
 $524,788
 $1,435,845
$145,244
 $115,164
 $60,304
 $232,802
 $33,854
 $1,003,928
 $1,591,296
Secured Debt220,122
 231,756
 208,422
 164,316
 122,372
 156,073
 1,103,061
168,945
 182,840
 131,450
 58,569
 59,973
 87,810
 689,587
Lease Payments3,652
 3,403
 3,187
 3,068
 2,890
 132,052
 148,252
2,973
 2,851
 2,672
 2,636
 2,530
 117,642
 131,304
Other Obligations (2)
60,642
 33,127
 25
 25
 
 
 93,819
56,763
 57,814
 50
 
 
 
 114,627
Total Contractual
Obligations
$518,170
 $615,845
 $329,064
 $335,048
 $169,937
 $812,913
 $2,780,977
$373,925
 $358,669
 $194,476
 $294,007
 $96,357
 $1,209,380
 $2,526,814
 
__________________________________
(1)
Includes principal and interest with interest on variable-rate debt calculated using rates at December 31, 20122014, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps. Also, excludes a $74.172.1 million debt service guaranty liability.
(2)Other obligations include income and real estate tax payments, commitments associated with our secured debt and other employee payments. Included in 2013,2015 is the estimated contribution to our retirement plan, which meets or exceeds the minimum statutory funding requirements. See Note 19 for additional information. Included in 2016 is a purchase obligation of $23.8 million. See Note 21 for additional information.
Related to our investment in a development project in Sheridan, Colorado, we our joint venture partner and the joint venture have each provided a guaranty for the payment of any debt service shortfalls on tax increment revenue bonds issued in connection with the project. In 2011, theThe Sheridan Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”("Agency") reissued $74.1 million ofissued Series A bonds used for an urban renewal project.project, of which $72.1 million remain outstanding at December 31, 2014. The bonds are to be repaid with incremental sales and property taxes and a public improvement fee (“PIF”("PIF") to be assessed on current and future retail sales and, to the extent necessary, any amounts we may have to provide under a guaranty. The incremental taxes and PIF are to remain intact until the earlier of the payment of the bond liability in full or 2040. The debt associated with this guaranty has been recorded in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012.2014.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2012,2014, none of our off balanceoff-balance sheet arrangements had a material effect on our liquidity or availability of, or requirement for, our capital resources. Letters of credit totaling $2.4$4.2 million were outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2012.2014.
We have entered into several unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and partnerships. Under many of these agreements, we and our joint venture partners are required to fund operating capital upon shortfalls in working capital. We have also committed to fund the capital requirements of several new development joint ventures. As operating manager of most of these entities, we have considered these funding requirements in our business plan.
Reconsideration events, including changes in variable interests, could cause us to consolidate these joint ventures and partnerships. We continuously evaluate these events as we become aware of them. Some triggers to be considered are additional contributions required by each partner and each partner’s ability to make those contributions. Under certain of these circumstances, we may purchase our partner’s interest. Our material unconsolidated real estate joint ventures are with entities which appear sufficiently stable; however, if market conditions were to continue to deteriorate and our partners are unable to meet their commitments, there is a possibility we may have to consolidate these entities. If we were to consolidate all of our unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, we would stillcontinue to be in compliance with our debt covenants.

4037

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2012, two2014, one unconsolidated real estate joint ventures wereventure was determined to be VIEsa VIE through the issuance of a secured loans,loan, since the lenders havelender had the ability to make decisions that could have a significant impact on the profitability of the entities.entity. Our maximum risk of loss associated with these VIEsthis VIE was limited to $33.0$11.0 million at December 31, 2012.2014.
As of December 31, 2014, we are working with a developer of a mixed-use project in Washington and have executed an agreement to purchase the retail portion of the project for approximately $23.8 million at closing, which is estimated to be in August 2016.
We have a real estate limited partnership agreement with a foreign institutional investor with a remaining potential obligation to purchase up to $280$240 million of retail properties in various states.through December 31, 2015. Our ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is 51%. To date, no properties haveone property has been purchased.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Certain of our key performance indicators are considered non-GAAP financial measures. Management uses these measures along with our GAAP financial statements in order to evaluate our operating results. We believe these additional measures provide users of our financial information additional comparable indicators of our industry, as well as, our performance.
Funds from Operations
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items and gains or losses from sales of operating real estate assets and interests in real estate equity investments, plus depreciation and amortization of operating properties and impairment of depreciable real estate and in substance real estate equity investments, including our share of unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and partnerships. We calculate FFO in a manner consistent with the NAREIT definition.
We believe FFO is a widely recognized measure of REIT operating performance which provides our shareholders with a relevant basis for comparison among other REITs. Management uses FFO as a supplemental internal measure to conduct and evaluate our business because there are certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as the primary measure of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that uses historical cost accounting is insufficient by itself. There can be no assurance that FFO presented by us is comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs.
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income or other measurements under GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity. FFO does not reflect working capital changes, cash expenditures for capital improvements or principal payments on indebtedness.

4138

Table of Contents

FFO is calculated as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders$109,210
 $(19,855) $10,730
$277,168
 $184,145
 $109,210
Depreciation and amortization143,783
 150,668
 143,393
145,660
 152,075
 143,783
Depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures and partnerships
20,955
 22,887
 20,085
14,793
 17,550
 20,955
Impairment of operating properties and real estate equity
investments
15,033
 28,995
 15,948
895
 457
 15,033
Impairment of operating properties of unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures and partnerships
19,946
 7,025
 115
305
 366
 19,946
Gain on acquisition(1,869) (4,559) 
Gain on acquisition including associated real estate equity
investment

 (20,234) (1,869)
Gain on sale of property and interests in real estate equity
investments
(83,683) (11,846) (3,069)(179,376) (95,675) (83,683)
(Gain) loss on sale of property of unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures and partnerships
(1,247) 10
 (194)
Funds from operations – basic and diluted$222,128
 $173,325
 $187,008
Gain on sale of property of unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures and partnerships
(4,919) (15,951) (1,247)
Other(8) (1) 
Funds from operations – basic254,518
 222,732
 222,128
Income attributable to operating partnership units2,171
 1,780
 1,721
Funds from operations - diluted$256,689
 $224,512
 $223,849
          
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic120,696
 120,331
 119,935
121,542
 121,269
 120,696
Effect of dilutive securities:          
Share options and awards1,009
 
 845
1,331
 1,191
 1,009
Operating partnership units1,497
 1,554
 1,578
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted121,705
 120,331
 120,780
124,370
 124,014
 123,283
          
Funds from operations per share – basic$1.84
 $1.44
 $1.56
$2.09
 $1.84
 $1.84
          
Funds from operations per share – diluted$1.83
 $1.44
 $1.55
$2.06
 $1.81
 $1.82
Same Property Net Operating Income
We consider SPNOI to be a key indicator of our financial performance as it provides a better indication of the recurring cash return on our properties by excluding certain non-cash revenues and expenses, as well as other infrequent or one-time items. We believe a pro rata basis is the most useful measurement as it provides our proportional share of SPNOI from all owned properties, including our share of SPNOI from unconsolidated joint ventures and partnerships, which cannot be readily determined under GAAP measurements and presentation. Although SPNOI is a widely used measure among REITs, there can be no assurance that SPNOI presented by us is comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs.

4239

Table of Contents

Properties are included in the SPNOI calculation if they are owned and operated for the entirety of the most recent two fiscal year periods, except for properties for which significant redevelopment or expansion occurred during either of the periods presented, and properties classified as discontinued operations. While there is judgment surrounding changes in designations, we move new development and redevelopment properties once they have stabilized, which is typically upon attainment of 90% occupancy. A rollforward of the properties included in our same property designation is as follows:
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2012
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2012
Three Months Ended 
 December 31, 2014
 Twelve Months Ended 
 December 31, 2014
Beginning of the period279
 354
234
 252
Properties added:      
Acquisitions
 8

 4
New Developments
 6

 4
Redevelopments
 3

 2
Properties removed:      
Dispositions(18) (100)(15) (39)
Redevelopments
 (10)
Other(1) (5)
End of the period261
 261
218
 218
We calculate SPNOI using operating income as defined by GAAP excluding property management fees, certain non-cash revenues and expenses such as straight-line rental revenue and the related reversal of such amounts upon early lease termination, depreciation, amortization, impairment losses, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs and other one-timenonrecurring items such as lease cancellation revenue,income, environmental abatement costs and demolition expenses. Consistent with the capital treatment of such costs under GAAP, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other direct leasing costs are excluded from SPNOI. A reconciliation of operating income to SPNOI is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
December 31,
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
Three Months Ended 
 December 31,
 Twelve Months Ended 
 December 31,
2012 2011 2012 20112014 2013 2014 2013
Operating Income$46,816
 $40,416
 $167,516
 $120,436
$43,969
 $38,832
 $182,038
 $159,868
Less:              
Revenue adjustments (1)
1,394
 1,278
 4,926
 6,808
2,259
 2,340
 7,213
 10,506
Add:              
Property management fees708
 653
 2,921
 2,850
662
 653
 2,847
 2,980
Depreciation and amortization37,851
 32,844
 140,983
 131,350
36,408
 39,724
 150,356
 146,763
Impairment loss
 3,101
 9,982
 55,574
1,024
 
 1,024
 2,579
General and administrative7,448
 6,579
 28,554
 25,477
7,023
 6,559
 24,902
 25,371
Acquisition costs21
 19
 1,494
 295
185
 128
 254
 498
Other (2)
130
 (652) 702
 (594)98
 190
 570
 316
Net Operating Income91,580
 81,682
 347,226
 328,580
87,110
 83,746
 354,778
 327,869
Less: NOI related to consolidated entities not defined
as same property and noncontrolling interests
(17,796) (11,466) (58,700) (51,357)(10,298) (10,477) (51,843) (38,007)
Add: Pro rata share of unconsolidated entities defined
as same property
9,484
 9,049
 37,643
 35,676
9,068
 9,615
 36,188
 38,169
Same Property Net Operating Income$83,268
 $79,265
 $326,169
 $312,899
$85,880
 $82,884
 $339,123
 $328,031
__________________________________
(1)Revenue adjustments consist primarily of straight-line rentals, and lease cancellation income.income and fee income primarily from real estate joint ventures and partnerships.
(2)Other includes items such as environmental abatement costs and demolition expenses.


4340

Table of Contents

Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011,February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities,” which2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This ASU's core objective is for an entity to recognize revenue based on the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for goods or services. Additionally, this ASU requires entities to provide new disclosures about offsetting and related arrangementsuse a single model in accounting for financial instruments and derivatives.revenues derived from contracts with customers. ASU No. 2014-09 replaces prior guidance regarding the recognition of revenue from sales of real estate except for revenue from sales that are part of a sale-leaseback transaction. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-112014-09 are effective for us on January 1, 2013,2017, and are required to be applied retrospectively.either on a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. We are currently assessing the impact, if any, that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." This ASU's core objective is that management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The provisions of ASU No. 2014-15 are effective for us as of December 31, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a materialany impact onto our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items." This ASU eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP. The provisions of ASU No. 2015-01 are effective for us as of January 1, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We plan to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2015, and we do not expect the adoption of this update to have any impact to our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We use fixed and floating-rate debt to finance our capital requirements. These transactions expose us to market risk related to changes in interest rates. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage a portion of this risk, primarily interest rate contracts with major financial institutions. These agreements expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties. We do not engage in the trading of derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business. At December 31, 20122014, we had fixed-rate debt of $2.01.7 billion and variable-rate debt of $211.4286.2 million, after adjusting for the net effect of $118.165.3 million notional amount of interest rate contracts. In the event interest rates were to increase 100 basis points and holding all other variables constant, annual net income and cash flows for the following year would decrease by approximately $2.1$.2 million associated with our variable-rate debt, including the effect of the interest rate contracts. The effect of the 100 basis points increase would decrease the fair value of our variable-rate and fixed-rate debt by approximately $6.4$5.4 million and $89.0$91.9 million, respectively.

4441

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trust Managers and Shareholders of
Weingarten Realty Investors
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Weingarten Realty Investors and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Weingarten Realty Investors and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Notes 2 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for and disclosure of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposals of Components of an Entity."
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 201319, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Houston, Texas
February 25, 201319, 2015

42

Table of Contents

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Revenues:     
Rentals, net$503,128
 $477,340
 $439,993
Other11,278
 11,855
 11,184
Total514,406
 489,195
 451,177
Expenses:     
Depreciation and amortization150,356
 146,763
 127,703
Operating95,318
 97,099
 88,924
Real estate taxes, net60,768
 57,515
 52,066
Impairment loss1,024
 2,579
 9,585
General and administrative24,902
 25,371
 28,538
Total332,368
 329,327
 306,816
Operating Income182,038
 159,868
 144,361
Interest Expense, net(94,725) (96,312) (106,248)
Interest and Other Income, net3,756
 7,685
 6,047
Gain on Sale and Acquisition of Real Estate Joint Venture and
Partnership Interests
1,718
 33,670
 14,203
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net22,317
 35,112
 (1,558)
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes1,261
 (7,046) 75
Income from Continuing Operations116,365
 132,977
 56,880
Operating Income from Discontinued Operations342
 12,214
 25,918
Gain on Sale of Property from Discontinued Operations44,582
 119,203
 68,619
Income from Discontinued Operations44,924
 131,417
 94,537
Gain on Sale of Property146,290
 762
 1,004
Net Income307,579
 265,156

152,421
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(19,571) (44,894) (5,781)
Net Income Adjusted for Noncontrolling Interests288,008
 220,262
 146,640
Dividends on Preferred Shares(10,840) (18,173) (34,930)
Redemption Costs of Preferred Shares
 (17,944) (2,500)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders$277,168
 $184,145
 $109,210
Earnings Per Common Share - Basic:     
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders$1.91
 $0.76
 $0.13
Income from discontinued operations0.37
 0.76
 0.77
Net income attributable to common shareholders$2.28
 $1.52
 $0.90
Earnings Per Common Share - Diluted:     
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders$1.89
 $0.75
 $0.13
Income from discontinued operations0.36
 0.75
 0.77
Net income attributable to common shareholders$2.25
 $1.50
 $0.90
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

43

Table of Contents

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Net Income$307,579
 $265,156
 $152,421
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:     
Net unrealized gain on investments, net of taxes354
 340
 
Realized gain on investments(38) 
 
Realized gain on derivatives
 5,893
 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives131
 530
 (123)
Amortization of loss on derivatives and designated hedges2,052
 2,299
 2,650
Retirement liability adjustment(10,733) 11,479
 473
Total(8,234) 20,541
 3,000
Comprehensive Income299,345
 285,697
 155,421
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(19,571) (44,894) (5,781)
Comprehensive Income Adjusted for Noncontrolling Interests$279,774
 $240,803
 $149,640
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


44

Table of Contents

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 December 31,
 2014 2013
ASSETS   
Property$4,076,094
 $4,289,276
Accumulated Depreciation(1,028,619) (1,058,040)
Property Held for Sale, net3,670
 122,614
Property, net *3,051,145
 3,353,850
Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net257,156
 266,158
Total3,308,301
 3,620,008
Notes Receivable from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
 13,330
Unamortized Debt and Lease Costs, net141,122
 164,828
Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable (net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $7,680 in 2014 and $9,386 in 2013) *
77,781
 82,351
Cash and Cash Equivalents *23,189
 91,576
Restricted Deposits and Mortgage Escrows79,998
 4,502
Other, net183,703
 247,334
Total Assets$3,814,094
 $4,223,929
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Debt, net *$1,938,188
 $2,299,844
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses112,479
 108,535
Other, net124,484
 127,572
Total Liabilities2,175,151
 2,535,951
Commitments and Contingencies
 
Equity:   
Shareholders' Equity:   
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest - par value, $.03 per share;
shares authorized: 10,000
   
6.5% Series F cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial interest;
140 shares issued; 60 shares outstanding in 2014 and 2013; liquidation
preference $150,000 in 2014 and 2013
2
 2
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest - par value, $.03 per share;
shares authorized: 275,000; shares issued and outstanding:
122,489 in 2014 and 121,949 in 2013
3,700
 3,683
Additional Paid-In Capital1,706,880
 1,679,229
Net Income Less Than Accumulated Dividends(212,960) (300,537)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(12,436) (4,202)
Total Shareholders' Equity1,485,186
 1,378,175
Noncontrolling Interests153,757
 309,803
Total Equity1,638,943
 1,687,978
Total Liabilities and Equity$3,814,094
 $4,223,929
* Consolidated variable interest entities' assets held as collateral and debt included in the above balances (see Note 22):
Property, net$47,085
 $70,734
Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable, net2,576
 2,855
Cash and Cash Equivalents12,189
 6,548
Debt, net97,362
 109,923
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

45

Table of Contents

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Revenues:     
Rentals, net$491,369
 $464,234
 $458,750
Other12,169
 14,123
 12,534
Total503,538
 478,357
 471,284
Expenses:     
Depreciation and amortization140,983
 131,350
 125,302
Operating98,426
 89,998
 90,881
Real estate taxes, net58,077
 55,522
 53,173
Impairment loss9,982
 55,574
 33,317
General and administrative28,554
 25,477
 24,944
Total336,022
 357,921
 327,617
Operating Income167,516
 120,436
 143,667
Interest Expense, net(115,812) (139,717) (145,391)
Interest and Other Income, net6,048
 5,062
 9,823
Loss on Redemption of Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes
 
 (135)
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Joint Venture and Partnership Interests14,203
 
 
Equity in (Losses) Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net(1,558) 7,834
 12,889
Gain on Acquisition1,869
 
 
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes(79) (146) 82
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations72,187
 (6,531) 20,935
Operating Income from Discontinued Operations10,611
 11,318
 27,205
Gain on Sale of Property from Discontinued Operations68,589
 10,273
 1,093
Income from Discontinued Operations79,200
 21,591
 28,298
Gain on Sale of Property1,034
 1,679
 2,005
Net Income152,421
 16,739

51,238
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(5,781) (1,118) (5,032)
Net Income Adjusted for Noncontrolling Interests146,640
 15,621
 46,206
Dividends on Preferred Shares(34,930) (35,476) (35,476)
Redemption Costs of Preferred Shares(2,500) 
 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders$109,210
 $(19,855) $10,730
Earnings Per Common Share - Basic:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders$0.25
 $(0.34) $(0.14)
Income from discontinued operations0.65
 0.17
 0.23
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders$0.90
 $(0.17) $0.09
Earnings Per Common Share - Diluted:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders$0.25
 $(0.34) $(0.14)
Income from discontinued operations0.65
 0.17
 0.23
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders$0.90
 $(0.17) $0.09
Comprehensive Income:     
Net Income$152,421
 $16,739
 $51,238
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):     
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives(123) (854) 123
Amortization of loss on derivatives2,650
 2,551
 2,566
Retirement liability adjustment473
 (7,666) (505)
Total3,000
 (5,969) 2,184
Comprehensive Income155,421
 10,770
 53,422
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(5,781) (1,118) (5,032)
Comprehensive Income Adjusted for Noncontrolling Interests$149,640
 $9,652
 $48,390
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net Income$307,579
 $265,156
 $152,421
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization150,616
 157,665
 148,413
Amortization of debt deferred costs and intangibles, net3,641
 (7,518) (1,162)
Impairment loss1,024
 2,815
 15,436
Equity in (earnings) losses of real estate joint ventures and partnerships, net(22,317) (35,112) 1,558
Gain on acquisition
 
 (1,869)
Gain on sale and acquisition of real estate joint venture and partnership interests(1,718) (33,670) (14,203)
Gain on sale of property(190,872) (119,965) (69,623)
Distributions of income from real estate joint ventures and partnerships, net4,058
 3,498
 3,141
Changes in accrued rent and accounts receivable, net(3,494) (4,606) 82
Changes in unamortized debt and lease costs and other assets, net(16,299) (19,587) (19,008)
Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, net2,890
 18,420
 (878)
Other, net5,661
 6,896
 13,022
Net cash provided by operating activities240,769
 233,992
 227,330
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:     
Acquisition of real estate and land(43,587) (105,765) (198,171)
Development and capital improvements(100,926) (76,992) (95,743)
Proceeds from sale of property and real estate equity investments, net351,224
 282,705
 591,091
Change in restricted deposits and mortgage escrows(75,299) 39,505
 (30,520)
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships and other receivables - Advances
 (289) (6,614)
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships and other receivables - Collections10,336
 19,411
 75,081
Real estate joint ventures and partnerships - Investments(5,223) (26,241) (9,792)
Real estate joint ventures and partnerships - Distributions of capital31,260
 59,932
 44,976
Purchase of investments(3,000) (58,836) 
Proceeds from investments51,788
 
 
Other, net1,504
 1,224
 
Net cash provided by investing activities218,077
 134,654
 370,308
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of debt4,500
 573,542
 300,098
Principal payments of debt(508,997) (449,629) (538,438)
Changes in unsecured credit facilities189,000
 (66,000) (100,500)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares of beneficial interest, net7,987
 5,968
 8,267
Repurchase of preferred shares of beneficial interest
 (275,000) (72,500)
Common and preferred dividends paid(199,343) (165,900) (173,202)
Debt issuance costs paid(463) (6,716) (4,250)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(21,055) (20,151) (12,770)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests980
 106,613
 2,123
Other, net158
 599
 (504)
Net cash used in financing activities(527,233) (296,674) (591,676)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(68,387) 71,972
 5,962
Cash and cash equivalents at January 191,576
 19,604
 13,642
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31$23,189
 $91,576
 $19,604
Interest paid during the period (net of amount capitalized of $3,302, $2,403 and $3,125, respectively)$91,277
 $106,918
 $117,085
Income taxes paid during the period$1,705
 $1,860
 $1,548
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

46

Table of Contents

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

 
Preferred
Shares of
Beneficial
Interest
 
Common
Shares of
Beneficial
Interest
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Net Income
Less Than
Accumulated
Dividends
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 Total
Balance, January 1, 2012$8
 $3,641
 $1,983,978
 $(304,504) $(27,743) $168,202
 $1,823,582
Net income      146,640
   5,781
 152,421
Redemption of preferred shares(1)   (69,999) (2,500)     (72,500)
Shares issued under benefit plans  22
 16,568
       16,590
Dividends paid – common shares      (140,686)     (140,686)
Dividends paid – preferred shares      (32,516)     (32,516)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests          (12,770) (12,770)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests          2,123
 2,123
Other comprehensive income        3,000
   3,000
Other, net    3,636
 (2,414)   (311) 911
Balance, December 31, 20127
 3,663
 1,934,183
 (335,980) (24,743) 163,025
 1,740,155
Net income      220,262
   44,894
 265,156
Redemption of preferred shares(5)   (257,051) (17,944)     (275,000)
Shares issued under benefit plans  20
 13,588
       13,608
Dividends paid – common shares      (148,702)     (148,702)
Dividends paid – preferred shares      (17,198)     (17,198)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests          (20,151) (20,151)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests          106,613
 106,613
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests    (16,177)     16,177
 
Other comprehensive income        20,541
   20,541
Other, net    4,686
 (975)   (755) 2,956
Balance, December 31, 20132
 3,683
 1,679,229
 (300,537) (4,202) 309,803
 1,687,978
Net income      288,008
   19,571
 307,579
Shares issued under benefit plans  17
 15,881
       15,898
Dividends paid – common shares      (189,591)     (189,591)
Dividends paid – preferred shares      (9,752)     (9,752)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests          (21,055) (21,055)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests          980
 980
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests    11,015
     (11,015) 
Disposition of noncontrolling interests          (144,263) (144,263)
Other comprehensive loss        (8,234)   (8,234)
Other, net    755
 (1,088)   (264) (597)
Balance, December 31, 2014$2
 $3,700
 $1,706,880
 $(212,960) $(12,436) $153,757
 $1,638,943
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 December 31, 
 2012 2011 
ASSETS    
Property$4,399,850
 $4,688,526
 
Accumulated Depreciation(1,040,839) (1,059,531) 
Property Held for Sale, net
 73,241
 
Property, net *3,359,011
 3,702,236
 
Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net289,049
 341,608
 
Total3,648,060
 4,043,844
 
Notes Receivable from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships89,776
 149,204
 
Unamortized Debt and Lease Costs, net135,783
 115,191
 
Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
 $12,127 in 2012 and $11,301 in 2011) *
79,540
 86,530
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents *19,604
 13,642
 
Restricted Deposits and Mortgage Escrows44,096
 11,144
 
Other, net167,925
 168,671
 
Total Assets$4,184,784
 $4,588,226
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Debt, net *$2,204,030
 $2,531,837
 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses119,699
 124,888
 
Other, net120,900
 107,919
 
Total Liabilities2,444,629
 2,764,644
 
Commitments and Contingencies
 
 
Equity:    
Shareholders' Equity:    
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest - par value, $.03 per share;
shares authorized: 10,000
    
6.75% Series D cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial interest; 100 shares
 issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011; liquidation preference $75,000
3
 3
 
6.95% Series E cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial interest; 29 shares
issued; no shares outstanding in 2012 and 29 shares outstanding in 2011; liquidation preference $72,500 in 2011

 1
 
6.5% Series F cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial interest; 140 shares
 issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011; liquidation preference $350,000
4
 4
 
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest—par value, $.03 per share; shares authorized:
275,000; shares issued and outstanding: 121,505 in 2012 and 120,844 in 2011
3,663
 3,641
 
Additional Paid-In Capital1,934,183
 1,983,978
 
Net Income Less Than Accumulated Dividends(335,980) (304,504) 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(24,743) (27,743) 
Total Shareholders' Equity1,577,130
 1,655,380
 
Noncontrolling Interests163,025
 168,202
 
Total Equity1,740,155
 1,823,582
 
Total Liabilities and Equity$4,184,784
 $4,588,226
 
* Consolidated Variable Interest Entities' Assets and Liabilities included in the above balances (See Note 22):
Property, net$226,685
 $230,159
 
Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable, net8,095
 8,564
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents11,706
 11,382
 
Debt, net276,420
 279,301
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

47

Table of Contents

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net Income$152,421
 $16,739
 $51,238
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization148,413
 157,290
 151,107
Amortization of deferred financing costs, net(1,162) 5,215
 5,017
Impairment loss15,436
 75,874
 33,317
Equity in losses (earnings) of real estate joint ventures and partnerships, net1,558
 (7,834) (12,889)
Gain on acquisition(1,869) (4,559) 
Gain on sale of real estate joint venture and partnership interests(14,203) 
 
Gain on sale of property(69,623) (11,952) (3,098)
Loss on redemption of convertible senior unsecured notes
 
 135
Distributions of income from real estate joint ventures and partnerships, net3,141
 2,186
 1,733
Changes in accrued rent and accounts receivable, net82
 6,662
 (2,898)
Changes in other assets, net(19,008) (22,482) (16,225)
Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, net(878) (13,525) (3,875)
Other, net13,022
 11,117
 11,063
Net cash provided by operating activities227,330
 214,731
 214,625
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:     
Acquisition of real estate and land(198,171) (49,880) (62,102)
Development and capital improvements(95,743) (94,108) (80,870)
Proceeds from sale of property and real estate equity investments, net591,091
 113,043
 29,064
Change in restricted deposits and mortgage escrows(30,520) (794) 2,175
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships and
 other receivables:
     
Advances(6,614) (2,926) (9,145)
Collections75,081
 15,687
 20,010
Real estate joint ventures and partnerships:     
Investments(9,792) (18,583) (37,738)
Distributions of capital44,976
 17,271
 15,663
Proceeds from tax increment revenue bonds
 16,545
 
Other, net
 
 1,522
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities370,308
 (3,745) (121,421)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of debt300,098
 215,750
 336
Proceeds from issuance of common shares of beneficial interest, net8,267
 3,999
 3,122
Repurchase of preferred shares of beneficial interest(72,500) 
 
Principal payments of debt(538,438) (336,760) (139,722)
Changes in unsecured credit facilities(100,500) 86,500
 80,000
Common and preferred dividends paid(173,202) (165,721) (158,012)
Debt issuance costs paid(4,250) (4,002) (6,622)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(12,770) (23,560) (13,014)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests2,123
 3,717
 2,686
Other, net(504) (1,126) 8,297
Net cash used in financing activities(591,676) (221,203) (222,929)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents5,962
 (10,217) (129,725)
Cash and cash equivalents at January 113,642
 23,859
 153,584
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31$19,604
 $13,642
 $23,859
Interest paid during the period (net of amount capitalized of $3,125, $2,329
 and $3,405, respectively)
$117,085
 $137,758
 $140,335
Income taxes paid during the period$1,548
 $1,578
 $2,116
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

48

Table of Contents
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 
Preferred
Shares of
Beneficial
Interest
 
Common
Shares of
Beneficial
Interest
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Net Income
Less Than
Accumulated
Dividends
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 Total
Balance, January 1, 2010$8
 $3,615
 $1,958,975
 $(37,350) $(23,958) $205,366
 $2,106,656
Net income      46,206
   5,032
 51,238
Shares issued in exchange for noncontrolling interests  1
 745
     (746) 
Shares issued under benefit plans  14
 8,005
       8,019
Dividends declared – common shares (1)
      (125,160)     (125,160)
Dividends declared – preferred shares (2)
      (32,852)     (32,852)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests          (13,014) (13,014)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests          2,686
 2,686
Consolidation of joint ventures          (18,573) (18,573)
Other comprehensive income        2,184
   2,184
Other, net    2,180
 (2,624)   (483) (927)
Balance, December 31, 20108
 3,630
 1,969,905
 (151,780) (21,774) 180,268
 1,980,257
Net income      15,621
   1,118
 16,739
Shares issued under benefit plans  11
 9,898
       9,909
Dividends declared – common shares (1)
      (132,869)     (132,869)
Dividends declared – preferred shares (2)
      (32,852)     (32,852)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests          (23,560) (23,560)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests          13,666
 13,666
Other comprehensive loss        (5,969)   (5,969)
Other, net    4,175
 (2,624)   (3,290) (1,739)
Balance, December 31, 20118
 3,641
 1,983,978
 (304,504) (27,743) 168,202
 1,823,582
Net income      146,640
   5,781
 152,421
Redemption of Series E preferred shares(1)   (69,999) (2,500)     (72,500)
Shares issued under benefit plans  22
 16,568
       16,590
Dividends declared – common shares (1)
      (140,686)     (140,686)
Dividends declared – preferred shares (2)
      (32,516)     (32,516)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests          (12,770) (12,770)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests          2,123
 2,123
Other comprehensive income        3,000
   3,000
Other, net    3,636
 (2,414)   (311) 911
Balance, December 31, 2012$7
 $3,663
 $1,934,183
 $(335,980) $(24,743) $163,025
 $1,740,155
(1)
Common dividend per share was $1.16, $1.10 and $1.04 for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(2)
Series D and F preferred dividend per share was $50.63 and $162.50 for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Series E preferred dividend per share was $162.16 for the year ended December 31, 2012, and $173.75 for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

49

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1.      Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Weingarten Realty Investors is a REIT organized under the Texas Business Organizations Code. We currently operate, and intend to operate in the future, as a REIT.
We, and our predecessor entity, began the ownership and development of shopping centers and other commercial real estate in 1948. Our primary business is leasing space to tenants in the shopping centers we own or lease. We also provide property management services for bothwhich we charge fees to either joint ventures in whichwhere we are partners and foror other outside owners for which we charge fees.owners.
We operate a portfolio of neighborhood and community shopping centers, that totalstotaling approximately 53.745.3 million million square feet of gross leasableleaseable area, that is either owned by us or others. We have a diversified tenant base, with our largest tenant comprising only 3.2%3.5% of totalbase minimum rental revenues during 20122014. Net operating income from continuing operations generated by our properties located in Houston and its surrounding areas was 21.1%19.7% of total net operating income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, and an additional 7.7%9.8% of net operating income from continuing operations iswas generated in 2014 from properties that are located in other parts of Texas.
We currently operate, and intend to operate in the future, as a REIT.
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our subsidiaries, certain partially owned real estate joint ventures or partnerships and VIEs which meet the guidelines for consolidation. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Such statements require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts on our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure in our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Rental revenue is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, which generally begins the date the tenant takes control of the space. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance is subject to our interpretation of lease provisions and is recognized in the period the related expense is recognized. Revenue based on a percentage of tenants’ sales is recognized only after the tenant exceeds their sales breakpoint. In circumstances where we provide a tenant improvement allowance for improvements that are owned by the tenant, we recognize the allowance as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Other revenue is income from contractual agreements with third parties, tenants or partially owned real estate joint ventures or partnerships, which is recognized as the related services are performed under the respective agreements.
Property
Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method, generally over estimated useful lives of 18-40 years for buildings and 10-20 years for parking lot surfacing and equipment. Major replacements where the betterment extends the useful life of the asset are capitalized and the replaced asset and corresponding accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. All other maintenance and repair items are charged to expense as incurred.
Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the acquisition method and, accordingly, the results of operations of an acquired property are included in our results of operations from the date of acquisition. Estimates of fair values are based upon estimated future cash flows and other valuation techniques in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Fair values are used to allocate and record the purchase price of acquired property among land, buildings on an “as if vacant” basis, tenant improvements, other identifiable intangibles and any goodwill or gain on purchase. Other identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include the effect of out-of-market leases, the value of having leases in place (“as is” versus “as if vacant” and absorption costs), out-of-market assumed mortgages and tenant relationships. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method, generally over estimated useful lives of 40 years for buildings and over the lease term which includes bargain renewal options for other identifiable intangible assets. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.

5048


Property also includes costs incurred in the development and redevelopment of new operating properties. These properties are carried at cost, and no depreciation is recorded on these assets until rent commences or no later than one year from the completion of major construction. These costs include preacquisition costs directly identifiable with the specific project, development and construction costs, interest and real estate taxes. Indirect development costs, including salaries and benefits, travel and other related costs that are directly attributable to the development of the property, are also capitalized. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for occupancy.
Property also includes costs for tenant improvements paid by us, including reimbursements to tenants for improvements that are owned by us and will remain our property after the lease expires.
Property identified for sale is reviewed to determine if it qualifies as held for sale based on the following criteria: management has approved and is committed to the disposal plan, the assets are available for immediate sale, an active plan is in place to locate a buyer, the sale is probable and expected to qualify as a completed sale within a year, the sales price is reasonable in relation to the current fair value, and it is unlikely that significant changes will be made to the sales plan or that the sales plan will be withdrawn. Upon qualification, these properties are segregated and classified as held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell and itssell. Prior to April 1, 2014, the disposed property's related operating results arewere reclassified into discontinued operations. Upon the adoption of new guidance as of April 1, 2014, our individual property disposals no longer qualified for discontinued operations presentation; thus, the results of these disposals remain in income from continuing operations and any associated gains are included in gain on sale of property.
Some of our properties are held in single purpose entities. A single purpose entity is a legal entity typically established at the request of a lender solely for the purpose of owning a property or group of properties subject to a mortgage. There may be restrictions limiting the entity’s ability to engage in an activity other than owning or operating the property, assuming or guaranteeing the debt of any other entity, or dissolving itself or declaring bankruptcy before the debt has been repaid. Most of our single purpose entities are 100% owned by us and are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
To determine the method of accounting for partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships, management determines whether an entity is a VIE and, if so, determines which party is the primary beneficiary by analyzing whether we have both the power to direct the entity’s significant economic activities and the obligation to absorb potentially significant losses or receive potentially significant benefits. Significant judgments and assumptions inherent in this analysis include the design of the entity structure, the nature of the entity’s operations, future cash flow projections, the entity’s financing and capital structure, and contractual relationships and terms. We consolidate a VIE when we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary.
Primary risks associated with our involvement with our VIEs include the potential funding of the entities’ debt obligations or making additional contributions to fund the entities’ operations.
Partially owned, non variablenon-variable interest real estate joint ventures and partnerships over which we have a controlling financial interest are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements. In determining if we have a controlling financial interest, we consider factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions, kick-out rights and substantive participating rights. Partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships where we do not have a controlling financial interest, but have the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method.
Management continually analyzes and assesses reconsideration events, including changes in the factors mentioned above, to determine if the consolidation or equity method treatment remains appropriate.
Notes Receivable from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships in which we havehad an ownership interest, primarily representrepresented mortgage construction notes. We considerconsidered applying a reserve to a note receivable when it becomesbecame apparent that conditions existexisted that may lead to our inability to fully collect on outstanding amounts due. Such conditions includeincluded delinquent or late payments on notes, deterioration in the ongoing relationship with the borrower and other relevant factors. When such conditions leading to expected losses exist,existed, we would estimate a reserve by reviewing the borrower’s ability to meet scheduled debt service, our partner’s ability to make contributions and the fair value of the collateral.

5149


Deferred Charges
Debt financing costs are amortized primarily on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the debt. Lease costs represent the initial direct costs incurred in origination, negotiation and processing of a lease agreement. Such costs include outside broker commissions and other independent third party costs, as well as salaries and benefits, travel and other internal costs directly related to completing a lease and are amortized over the life of the lease on a straight-line basis. Costs related to supervision, administration, unsuccessful origination efforts and other activities not directly related to completed lease agreements are charged to expense as incurred.
Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable, net
Receivables include base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributable to the straight-lining of rental commitments. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable is determined based upon an analysis of balances outstanding, historical bad debt levels, tenant creditworthiness and current economic trends. Additionally, estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims with respect to tenants in bankruptcy are considered in assessing the collectibility of the related receivables. Management’s estimate of the collectibility of accrued rents and accounts receivable is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held at major financial institutions in the U.S. We had cash and cash equivalents in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents amongst several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. We believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk and regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions.
Restricted Deposits and Mortgage Escrows
Restricted deposits and mortgage escrows consist of escrow deposits held by lenders primarily for property taxes, insurance and replacement reserves and restricted cash that is held for a specific use or in a qualified escrow account for the purposes of completing like-kind exchange transactions.
Our restricted deposits and mortgage escrows consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Restricted cash (1)
$36,944
 $3,169
$77,739
 $869
Mortgage escrows7,152
 7,975
2,259
 3,633
Total$44,096
 $11,144
$79,998
 $4,502
___________________
(1)
The increase between the periods presented is primarily attributable to $30.777.4 million placed in a qualified escrow account for the purpose of completing like-kind exchange transactions.
Other Assets, net
Other assets include an asset related to the debt service guaranty (see Note 7 for further information), tax increment revenue bonds, investments, investments held in a grantor trusts,trust, deferred tax assets, prepaid expenses, interest rate derivatives, the value of above-market leases and the related accumulated amortization and other miscellaneous receivables. Investments held in a grantor truststrust and investments in mutual funds are adjusted to fair value at each period end with changes included in our Consolidated Statements of OperationsOperations. The value of our investments in mutual funds approximates the cost basis. Investments held to maturity are carried at amortized cost and Comprehensive Income.are adjusted using the interest method for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Our tax increment revenue bonds have been classified as held to maturity and are recorded at amortized cost offset by a recognized credit loss (see Note 24 for further information). Above-market leases are amortized as adjustments to rental revenues over terms of the acquired leases. Other miscellaneous receivables have a reserve applied to the carrying amount when it becomes apparent that conditions exist that may lead to our inability to fully collect on outstanding amounts due. Such conditions include delinquent or late payments on receivables, deterioration in the ongoing relationship with the borrower and other relevant factors. We would establish a reserve when expected loss conditions exist by reviewing the borrower’s ability to generate revenues to meet debt service requirements and assessing the fair value of any collateral.

50


Derivatives and Hedging
We manage interest cost using a combination of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. To manage our interest rate risk, we occasionally hedge the future cash flows of our existing floating-rate debt transactions,or anticipated fixed-rate debt issuances, as well as changes in the fair value of our existing fixed-rate debt instruments, principally through interest rate contracts with major financial institutions. Interest rate contracts that meet specific criteria are accounted for as either a cash flow or fair value hedge.

52


Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk:
Our objective in using interest rate contracts is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swap and/or cap contracts as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate contracts designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount or capping floating rate interest payments.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. For hedges of fixed-rate debt issuances, the interest rate contracts are cash settled upon the pricing of the debt, with amounts deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss and amortized as an increase/decrease to interest expense over the originally hedged period.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings.
Fair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk:
We are exposed to changes in the fair value of certain of our fixed-rate obligations due to changes in benchmark interest rates, such as LIBOR. We use interest rate contracts to manage our exposure to changes in fair value on these instruments attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate. Interest rate contracts designated as fair value hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Changes in the fair value of interest rate contracts designated as fair value hedges, as well as changes in the fair value of the related debt being hedged, are recorded in earnings each reporting period.
Sales of Real Estate
Sales of real estate include the sale of tracts of land within a shopping center development, property adjacent to shopping centers, operating properties, newly developed properties, investments in real estate joint ventures and partnerships and partial sales to real estate joint ventures and partnerships in which we participate.
Profits on sales of real estate are not recognized until (a) a sale is consummated; (b) the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay; (c) the seller’s receivable is not subject to future subordination; and (d) we have transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership in the transaction, and we do not have a substantial continuing involvement with the property.
We recognize gains on the sale of real estate to joint ventures and partnerships in which we participate to the extent we receive cash from the joint venture or partnership, if it meets the sales criteria in accordance with GAAP, and we do not have a commitment to support the operations of the real estate joint venture or partnership to an extent greater than our proportionate interest in the real estate joint venture or partnership.
Impairment
Our property is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property, including any capitalized costs and any identifiable intangible assets, may not be recoverable.
If such an event occurs, a comparison is made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each such property into the foreseeable future, with consideration of applicable holding periods, on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If we determine the carrying amount is not recoverable, our basis in the property is reduced to its estimated fair value to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. Fair values are determined by management utilizing cash flow models, market capitalization rates and market discount rates, or by obtaining third-party broker or appraisal estimates in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy.

51


We review economic considerations at each reporting period, including the effects of tenant bankruptcies, the suspension of tenant expansion plans for new development projects, declines in real estate values, and any changes to plans related to our new development properties including land held for development, to identify properties where we believe market values may be deteriorating. Determining whether a property is impaired and, if impaired, the amount of write-down to fair value requires a significant amount of judgment by management and is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation. If market conditions deteriorate or management’s plans for certain properties change, additional write-downs could be required in the future.
Our investment in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is reviewed for impairment each reporting period. The ultimate realization is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the estimated fair value of an investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary. There is no certainty that impairments will not occur in the future if market conditions decline or if management’s plans for these investments change.

53


Our investments in tax increment revenue bonds are reviewed for impairment, including the evaluation of changes in events or circumstances that may indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. Realization is dependent on a number of factors, including investment performance, market conditions and payment structure. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the value of the investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary, recovery of its cost basis is uncertain, and/or it is uncertain if the investment will be held to maturity. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, our tax increment revenue bonds have been classified as held to maturity.
Interest Capitalization
Interest is capitalized on land under development and buildings under construction based on rates applicable to borrowings outstanding during the period and the weighted average balance of qualified assets under development/construction during the period.
Interest Expense in Discontinued Operations
Interest expense that is specifically identifiable to property, both held for sale and sold and qualifies as discontinued operations, is included in operating income from discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements. We do not allocate other consolidated interest to operating income from discontinued operations because the interest savings to be realized from the proceeds of the sale of these operations is not material.
Income Taxes
We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income we distribute to our shareholders. To be taxed as a REIT, we must meet a number of requirements including defined percentage tests concerning the amount of our assets and revenues that come from, or are attributable to, real estate operations. As long as we distribute at least 90% of the taxable income of the REIT (without regard to capital gains or the dividends paid deduction) to our shareholders as dividends, we will not be taxed on the portion of our income we distribute as dividends unless we have ineligible transactions.
The Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999 gave REITs the ability to conduct activities which a REIT was previously precluded from doing as long as such activities are performed in entities which have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries under the IRS code. These activities include buying or developing properties with the express purpose of selling them. We conduct certain of these activities in a taxable REIT subsidiary that we have created. We calculate and record income taxes in our consolidated financial statements based on the activities in this entity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between our carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. These are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is established for those assets we do not consider the realization of such assets to be more likely than not.
Additionally, GAAP prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. A tax position may only be recognized in the consolidated financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination. We believe it is more likely than not that our tax positions will be sustained in any tax examinations.
In addition, we are subject to the State of Texas business tax (“Texas Franchise Tax”), which is determined by applying a tax rate to a base that considers both revenues and expenses. Therefore, the Texas Franchise Tax is considered an income tax and is accounted for accordingly.

52


Share-Based Compensation
We have share option and restricted share award plans. In November 2011, we announced changes to the long-term incentive program under our Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2011 Program Changes"). Future grants of awards will incorporate both service-based and market-based measures for restricted share awards to promote share ownership among the participants and to emphasize the importance of total shareholder return. The terms of each grant vary depending upon the participant's responsibilities and position within the Company. All awards are valuedrecorded at the fair market value on the date of grant and earn dividends throughout the vesting period. Compensation expense is measured at the grant date and recognized over the vesting period. All share awards are awarded subject to the participant’s continued employment with us.
The share awards are subject to a three-year cliff vesting basis. Service-based and market-based share awards are subject to the achievement of select performance goals as follows:
Service-based awards and accumulated dividends typically vest three years from the grant date. These grants are subject only to continued employment and not dependent on future performance measures. Accordingly, if such vesting criteria are not met, compensation cost previously recognized would be reversed.

54


Market-based awards vest based upon the performance metrics at the end of a three-year period. These awards are based 50% on our three-year relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) as compared to the FTSE NAREIT U.S. Shopping Center Index. The other 50% is tied to our three-year absolute TSR. At the end of a three-year period, the performance measures are analyzed; the actual number of shares earned is determined and the earned shares and the accumulated dividends vest. The probability of meeting the market criteria is considered when calculating the estimated fair value on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation. These awards are accounted for as awards with market criteria, with compensation cost recognized over the service period, regardless of whether the market criteria are achieved and the awards are ultimately earned and vest.
Share options granted to non-officers prior to the 2011 Program Changes vest ratably over a three-year period beginning after the grant date, and share options and restricted shares for officers vest ratably over a five-year period after the grant date. Restricted shares granted to trust managers and share options or awards granted to retirement eligible employees are expensed immediately. Restricted shares have the same rights of a common shareholder, including the right to vote and receive dividends, except as otherwise provided by our Management Development and Executive Compensation Committee.
The grant price for our options is calculated as an average of the high and low of the quoted fair value of our common shares on the date of grant. Issued options generally expire upon the earlier of termination of employment or 10 years from the date of grant, and restricted shares for officers and trust managers are granted at no purchase price. Our policy is to recognize compensation expense for equity awards ratably over the vesting period, except for retirement eligible amounts.
The fair value of share options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method based on certain expected weighted average assumptions; including the dividend yield, the expected volatility, the expected life and the risk free interest rate. The dividend yield was an average of the historical yields at each record date over the estimated expected life. We estimated volatility using our historical volatility data for a period of 10 years, and the expected life was based on historical data from an option valuation model of employee exercises and terminations. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve.
Retirement Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plans:
We sponsor a noncontributory cash balance retirement plan (“Retirement Plan”) under which an account is maintained for each participant. Annual additions to each participant’s account include a service credit ranging from 3%-5% of compensation, depending on years of service, and an interest credit of 4.5% effective January 1, 2011. The interest credit for prior years was based on the 10 year U.S. Treasury Bill rate not to be less than 2.05%. Vesting generally occurs after three years of service. In addition to the plan described above, prior to January 1, 2012, we had established two separate and independent nonqualified supplemental retirement plans (“SRP”) for certain employees. These unfunded plans provided benefits in excess

53


Investments of Plan Assets
Our investment policy for our plan assets has been to determine the objectives for structuring a retirement savings program suitable to the long-term needs and risk tolerances of participants, to select appropriate investments to be offered by the plan and to establish procedures for monitoring and evaluating the performance of the investments of the plan. Our overall plan objectives for selecting and monitoring investment options are to promote and optimize retirement wealth accumulation; to provide a full range of asset classes and investment options that are intended to help diversify the portfolio to maximize return within reasonable and prudent levels of risk; to control costs of administering the plan; and to manage the investments held by the plan.

55


The selection of investment options is determined using criteria based on the following characteristics: fund history, relative performance, investment style, portfolio structure, manager tenure, minimum assets, expenses and operation considerations. Investment options selected for use in the plan are reviewed at least on a semi-annual basis to evaluate material changes from the selection criteria. Asset allocation is used to determine how the investment portfolio should be split between stocks, bonds and cash. The asset allocation decision is influenced by investment time horizon; risk tolerance; and investment return objectives. The primary factor in establishing asset allocation is demographics of the plan, including attained age and future service. A broad market diversification model is used in considering all these factors and the percentage allocation to each investment category may also vary depending upon market conditions. Re-balancing of the allocation of plan assets occurs semi-annually.
Defined Contribution Plans:
Effective January 1, 2012, we amended our SRPtwo separate and independent nonqualified supplemental retirement plans (“SRP”) for certain employees to be defined contribution plans from defined benefit plans. These unfunded plans continue to provide benefits in excess of the statutory limits of our noncontributory cash balance retirement plan. For active participants as of January 1, 2012, annual additions to each participant’s account include an actuarially-determined service credit ranging from 3% to 5% and an interest credit of 4.5%. Vesting generally occurs between five and 10 years of service. We have elected to use the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to which the participant was entitled if the participant separated immediately from the SRP, as permitted by GAAP.
The SRP participants' account balances, under the defined benefit plan,prior to January 1, 2012, were converted to a cash balance retirement plan which no longer receives service credits but would continuecontinues to receive a 7.5% interest credit for active participants and a December 31 90-day LIBOR rate plus .50% for inactive participants.
We have a Savings and Investment Plan pursuant to which eligible employees may elect to contribute from 1% of their salaries to the maximum amount established annually by the IRS. Employee contributions are matched by us at the rate of $.50 per $1.0050% for the first 6% of the employee's salary. The employees vest in the employer contributions ratably over a five year-year period.
Deferred Compensation Plan
We have a deferred compensation plan for eligible employees allowing them to defer portions of their current cash salary or share-based compensation. Deferred amounts are deposited in a grantor trust, which are included in net other net assets, and are reported as compensation expense in the year service is rendered. Cash deferrals are invested based on the employee’s investment selections from a mix of assets selected using a broad market diversification model. Deferred share-based compensation cannot be diversified, and distributions from this plan are made in the same form as the original deferral.
Fair Value Measurements
Certain financial instruments, estimates and transactions are required to be calculated, reported and/or recorded at fair value. The estimated fair values of such financial items, including debt instruments, impaired assets, acquisitions, investment securities and derivatives, have been determined using a market-based measurement. This measurement is determined based on the assumptions that management believes market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability; including, market capitalization rates, discount rates, current operating income, local economics and other factors. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

54


Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The fair value of such financial instruments, estimates and transactions was determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies as prescribed by GAAP.

56


Internally developed and third party fair value measurements, including the unobservable inputs, are evaluated by management with sufficient experience for reasonableness based on current market knowledge, trends and transactional experience in the real estate and capital markets. Our valuation policies and procedures are determined by our Accounting Group, which reports to the Chief Financial Officer and the results of significant impairment transactions are discussed with the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis.
Fair value estimates are based on limited available market information for similar transactions, including our notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships, tax increment revenue bonds and debt, and there can be no assurance that the disclosed value of any financial instrument could be realized by immediate settlement of the instrument. The following provides information about the methods used to estimate the fair value of the our financial instruments, including their estimated fair values:
Investments Held in Grantor Trusts and Deferred Compensation Plan Obligations
These assetsInvestments in mutual funds held in a grantor trust and mutual funds are valued based on publicly quotedpublicly-quoted market prices for identical assets, whichassets. The time deposit is a short-term investment tradeable in the secondary market and reflects current rates for a deposit with similar maturity and credit quality. The deferred compensation plan obligations corresponds to the value of our investments held in a grantor trust. Investments held to maturity are carried at amortized cost and are adjusted using the deferred compensation plan obligations.interest method for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Derivative Instruments
We use interest rate contracts with major financial institutions to manage our interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined based on assumptions that management believes market participants would use in pricing, using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of our interest rate contracts have been determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counter-party’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral, thresholds and guarantees. An accounting policy election was made to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by ourselves and our counter-parties. However, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that the derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

55


Notes Receivable from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
We estimate the fair value of our notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships using quoted market prices for publicly-traded notes and discounting estimated future cash receipts. The discount rates used approximate current lending rates for a note or groups of notes with similar maturities and credit quality, assumes the note is outstanding through maturity and considers the note’s collateral (if applicable). We utilize market information as available or present value techniques to estimate the amounts required to be disclosed.
Tax Increment Revenue Bonds
The fair value estimates of our held to maturity tax increment revenue bonds, which were issued by the Agency in connection with our investment in a development project in Sheridan, Colorado, are based on assumptions that management believes market participants would use in pricing, using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis based on the expected future sales tax revenues of the development project. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the bonds, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, such as market discount rates and unobservable market-based inputs, such as future growth and inflation rates.

57


Debt
The fair value of our debt ismay be based primarily on quoted market prices for publicly-traded debt, on a third-party established benchmark for inactively traded debt and on the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made for othernon-traded debt. For inactively traded debt, our third-party provider establishes a benchmark for all REIT securities based on the largest, most liquid and most frequent investment grade securities in the REIT bond market. This benchmark is then adjusted to consider how a market participant would be compensated for risk premiums such as, longevity of maturity dates, lack of liquidity and credit quality of the issuer. The discount rates used approximate current lending rates for loans or groups of loans with similar maturities and credit quality, assumes the debt is outstanding through maturity and considers the debt’s collateral (if applicable). We have utilized market information as available or present value techniques to estimate the amounts required to be disclosed.
Reportable Segments
Our primary focus is to lease space to tenants in shopping centers that we own, lease or manage. Historically, we reviewed operating and financial information for each property by commercial use and on an individual basis. Each commercial use or each property represents an individual operating segment.
We evaluate the performance of the reportable segments based on net operating income, defined as total revenues less operating expenses and real estate taxes. Management does not consider the effect of gains or losses from the sale of property or interests in real estate joint ventures and partnerships in evaluating segment operating performance.
With the sale of our industrial portfolio in May 2012, we no longer analyze our properties by commercial use. Further, no individual property constitutes more than 10% of our revenues, net operating income or assets, and we have no operations outside of the United States of America. Therefore, our properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment since such properties and the tenants thereof each share similar economic and operating characteristics.

56


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
OurChanges in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component consists of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Derivatives$7,489
 $10,016
Retirement liability17,254
 17,727
Total$24,743
 $27,743
 
Gain
on
Investments
 
Gain
on
Cash Flow
Hedges
 
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plan
 Total
Balance, December 31, 2013$(340) $(1,233) $5,775
 $4,202
Change excluding amounts reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(354) (131) 11,118
 10,633
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive loss
38
(1) 
(2,052)
(2) 
(385)
(3) 
(2,399)
Net other comprehensive (income) loss(316) (2,183) 10,733
 8,234
Balance, December 31, 2014$(656) $(3,416) $16,508
 $12,436
        
 
Gain
on
Investments
 
(Gain) Loss
on
Cash Flow
Hedges
 
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plan
 Total
Balance, December 31, 2012$
 $7,489
 $17,254
 $24,743
Change excluding amounts reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(340) (6,423) (10,200) (16,963)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive loss

 (2,299)
(2) 
(1,279)
(3) 
(3,578)
Net other comprehensive income(340) (8,722) (11,479) (20,541)
Balance, December 31, 2013$(340) $(1,233) $5,775
 $4,202
___________________
(1)This reclassification component is included in interest and other income.
(2)This reclassification component is included in interest expense (see Note 8 for additional information).
(3)This reclassification component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (see Note 19 for additional information).
Reclassifications
The reclassification of prior years’ operating results for certain properties classified as discontinued operations was made to conform to the current year presentation (see Note 15 and 17 for additional information). Also, we have disaggregated certain line items in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to conform to the current year presentation. Prior years’ acquisition of real estate and land was segregated from development and capital improvements (which was previously titled investment in property). These items had no impact on previously reported net income, earnings per share, the consolidated balance sheet or cash flows.

Note 2.      Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011,February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments2013-04, "Obligations Resulting From Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date." This ASU requires an entity to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurementmeasure obligations resulting from joint and Disclosure Requirementsseveral liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of (1) the amount the reporting entity has agreed to pay in U.S. GAAPaccordance to the arrangement and IFRSs,” which amends previous guidance resulting in common fair value measurement(2) any additional amounts the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. Additional disclosures on the nature and disclosure requirements between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments both clarifyamounts of the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and changes certain principles or requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements.obligation will also be required. The provisions of this updateASU No. 2013-04 were effective for us aton January 1, 2012.2014, and were required to be applied retrospectively. The ASU did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." This ASU amends current GAAP to require entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for net operating loss or other tax credit carryforwards when settlement is available under the tax law. The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 were effective for us on January 1, 2014, and were required to be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits in existence. The adoption of this updateASU did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

5857


In June 2011,April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Comprehensive Income,” whichDisposals of Components of an Entity." This ASU amends previous guidance by requiring all nonowner changesthe criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in equitythis area. The provisions of ASU No. 2014-08 are effective for us prospectively on January 1, 2015; however, early adoption is permitted. We adopted this update effective April 1, 2014. The adoption resulted in individual property disposals no longer qualifying for discontinued operations presentation; thus, the results of these disposals will remain in income from continuing operations, and any associated gains are included in gain on sale of property. Properties sold or classified as held for sale prior to April 1, 2014, are not subject to ASU No. 2014-08 and therefore, continue to be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. classified as discontinued operations using the previous definition.
In addition, an entity will be required to present on the face of the financial statements, reclassification adjustments for items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income. In December 2011,May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Deferral of Effective Date2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This ASU's core objective is for Amendmentsan entity to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,” which primarily defers ASU No. 2011-05's provision of requiring the presentation of other comprehensive income reclassification adjustmentsrecognize revenue based on the face of the financial statements. All other provisions ofconsideration it expects to receive in exchange for goods or services. Additionally, this ASU No. 2011-05 were effective for us at December 31, 2011 upon our early adoption, and this update did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities,” which requires entities to provide new disclosures about offsetting and related arrangementsuse a single model in accounting for financial instruments and derivatives.revenues derived from contracts with customers. ASU No. 2014-09 replaces prior guidance regarding the recognition of revenue from sales of real estate except for revenue from sales that are part of a sale-leaseback transaction. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-112014-09 are effective for us on January 1, 2013,2017, and are required to be applied retrospectively.either on a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. We are currently assessing the impact, if any, that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." This ASU's core objective is that management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issuedor are available to be issued. The provisions of ASU No. 2014-15 are effective for us as of December 31, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a materialany impact onto our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items." This ASU eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP. The provisions of ASU No. 2015-01 are effective for us as of January 1, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We plan to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2015, and we do not expect the adoption of this update to have any impact to our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3.      Property
Our property consisted of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Land$881,156
 $918,627
Land held for development121,294
 124,528
Land under development6,155
 20,281
Buildings and improvements3,325,793
 3,557,173
Construction in-progress65,452
 67,917
Total$4,399,850
 $4,688,526
The following carrying charges were capitalized (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Interest$3,125
 $2,329
 $3,405
Real estate taxes370
 399
 344
Total$3,495
 $2,728
 $3,749
 December 31,
 2014 2013
Land$821,614
 $854,409
Land held for development103,349
 116,935
Land under development24,297
 4,262
Buildings and improvements3,061,616
 3,238,817
Construction in-progress65,218
 74,853
Total$4,076,094
 $4,289,276
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we acquired four shopping centers and other property for approximately $232.3 million, which includes the acquisition of a partner's 79.6% interest in an unconsolidated tenancy-in-common arrangement, and invested $29.5 million for new development projects.
During the year ended December 31, 20122014, we sold 2726 shopping centers54 industrial properties and other retail property. We also assigned a 75% consolidated joint venture interest to our partner. Aggregate gross sales proceeds including the assumption of debt by the buyer, from these transactions totaledapproximated $620.7362.4 million and generated gains of approximately $69.5167.6 million. Included in these transactions is the exercise of a purchase option by a holder of our ground leases in Texas that resulted in the disposition of three properties. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2014, we acquired one center with a gross purchase price of approximately $43.8 million and invested $47.4 million in new development projects.
Also, seven propertiesAt December 31, 2014, we classified one property as held for sale totaling $94.8$9.4 million before accumulated depreciation werethat did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, the property classified as held for sale was sold. We classified eight properties as held for sale as of December 31, 2011, with no properties classified as of December 31, 2012. Additionally, two shopping centers classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011 were reclassified to operations2013, totaling $18.1$155.0 million before accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2012. See(see Note 15 for additional information.

information).

5958


Note 4.      Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
We own interests in real estate joint ventures or limited partnerships and have tenancy-in-common interests in which we exercise significant influence, but do not have financial and operating control. We account for these investments using the equity method, and our interests range from 10%20% to 75% during 2012 and 7.8% to 75% during 2011.for the periods presented. Combined condensed financial information of these ventures (at 100%) is summarized as follows (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Combined Condensed Balance Sheets      
      
ASSETS      
Property$1,631,694
 $2,108,745
$1,331,445
 $1,401,982
Accumulated depreciation(273,591) (296,496)(279,067) (261,454)
Property, net1,358,103
 1,812,249
1,052,378
 1,140,528
Other assets, net161,344
 173,130
126,890
 142,638
Total$1,519,447
 $1,985,379
Total Assets$1,179,268
 $1,283,166
      
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Debt, net (primarily mortgages payable)$468,841
 $556,920
$380,816
 $453,390
Amounts payable to Weingarten Realty Investors and Affiliates109,931
 170,007
13,749
 30,214
Other liabilities, net34,157
 41,907
26,226
 29,711
Total612,929
 768,834
Accumulated equity906,518
 1,216,545
Total$1,519,447
 $1,985,379
Total Liabilities420,791
 513,315
Equity758,477
 769,851
Total Liabilities and Equity$1,179,268
 $1,283,166
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Combined Condensed Statements of Operations          
Revenues, net$195,109
 $205,596
 $193,649
$153,301
 $165,365
 $195,109
Expenses:          
Depreciation and amortization59,330
 67,459
 61,726
40,235
 45,701
 59,330
Interest, net35,491
 37,612
 36,270
22,657
 28,787
 35,491
Operating34,989
 36,253
 34,026
27,365
 28,929
 34,989
Real estate taxes, net23,899
 24,333
 24,288
18,159
 18,929
 23,899
General and administrative1,106
 2,969
 3,927
916
 934
 1,106
Provision for income taxes316
 343
 237
417
 278
 316
Impairment loss96,781
 28,776
 231
1,526
 1,887
 96,781
Total251,912
 197,745
 160,705
111,275
 125,445
 251,912
Operating (loss) income$(56,803) $7,851
 $32,944
Operating income (loss)$42,026
 $39,920
 $(56,803)
Our investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships, as reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, differs from our proportionate share of the entities’ underlying net assets due to basis differences, which arose upon the transfer of assets to the joint ventures. The net positive (negative) basis differences, which totaled $1.65.2 million and $(7.5)6.1 million at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, respectively, are generally amortized over the useful lives of the related assets.

6059


Our real estate joint ventures and partnerships have determined from time to time that the carrying amount of certain properties was not recoverable and that the properties should be written down to fair value. For the year ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, our unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and partnerships recorded an impairment charge of $96.81.5 million, $28.81.9 million and $.296.8 million, respectively, associated primarily with various properties that are being either marketed for sale, have been sold or with shorter holding periods of finite life joint ventures where the joint ventures’ ability to recover the carrying cost of the property may be limited by the term of the venture life.
Fees earned by us for the management of these real estate joint ventures and partnerships totaled $4.6 million in 2014, $5.0 million in 2013 and $6.1 million in 2012.
During 2014, we had a partial disposition of a 50% interest at an unconsolidated real estate joint venture for approximately $5.1 million, resulting in a gain on our investment of $1.7 million. Also, we sold four centers and other property held in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, for approximately $19.9 million, of which our share of the gain totaled $4.9 million.
During 2013, the final two industrial properties in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture were sold. This joint venture was liquidated resulting in an $6.011.5 million ingain on our investment. Also, 2011three shopping centers were sold, and our gross sales proceeds from the disposition of these five properties totaled $5.835.5 million in, of which our share of the gain totaled $16.0 million. Furthermore, we sold our 2010.
In August 2012, we acquired our partner's 79.6%10% interest in antwo unconsolidated tenancy-in-common arrangement for approximately $29.6 millionarrangements and two unconsolidated real estate joint ventures that we had previously accounted for under the equity method, and includes the assumptionfor approximately $15.7 million, resulting in a gain of debt$1.9 million.
During 2013, a 51% owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture acquired real estate assets of approximately $24.541.2 million. This transaction resulted in the consolidation of the property inWe also acquired our consolidated financial statements.
During 2012, our interest in 19 industrial properties held in unconsolidated joint ventures, in which we are a partner, were sold through either a direct sale by the joint venture or the sale of our interest. Gross sales proceeds, including the assumption of debt, from these transactions totaled $210.4 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, the final two properties in an unconsolidated joint venture were sold, and the joint venture will be liquidated.
In February 2012, we sold a 47.8% unconsolidated joint venture interest in a Colorado development project to our partner with gross sales proceeds totaling $29.1 million, which includes the assumption of our share of debt.
In April 2011, we acquired a partner’s 50%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture interest in three retail properties for approximately $11.6 million. We also acquired our partner’s 50% unconsolidated joint venture interest in a Florida developmentCalifornia property that we had previously accounted for under the equity method. This transaction resulted in the consolidation of the property in our consolidated financial statements.statements (see Note 23 for additional information).

Note 5.      Notes Receivable from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
We have ownership interests in a number of real estate joint ventures and partnerships. NotesAt December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships. At December 31, 2013, various notes receivable from these entities bearbore interest ranging from approximately 2.9% to 16.0%5.7% at December 31, 2012per year and 2.8% to 10.0% at December 31, 2011. These notes are duematured at various dates through 2014 and are generally2017. Generally, these notes receivable were secured by underlying real estate assets.
We believe theseThe outstanding notes arewere fully collectible,paid during 2014, and no allowance has been recorded. write-offs occurred. Interest income recognized on these notes was $3.0.1 million, $3.42.2 million and $4.33.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, respectively.
In November 2012,December 2013, we acquired our partner’s 50% unconsolidated joint venture interest in a $16.1California property, which includes the settlement of $54.8 million note matured and is under negotiations for repayment. We believe no loss will be incurred associated with this settlement.
In February 2012, we received $59.2 million in payment of our notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships, in conjunction with the sale of our interest in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture. See Note 20 for additional information.
In April 2011, we eliminated $21.9 million of our notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships upon the purchase of our partner’s 50% unconsolidated joint venture interest in a Florida development property.

partnerships.

6160


Note 6.      Identified Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Identified intangible assets and liabilities associated with our property acquisitions are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Identified Intangible Assets:      
Above-market leases (included in Other Assets, net)$16,142
 $17,342
$38,121
 $38,577
Above-market leases - Accumulated Amortization(8,413) (11,587)(11,331) (8,767)
Below-market assumed mortgages (included in Debt, net)5,722
 5,722
4,713
 4,713
Below-market assumed mortgages - Accumulated Amortization(2,367) (1,762)(2,352) (1,900)
Valuation of in place leases (included in Unamortized Debt and Lease Costs, net)104,353
 74,361
132,554
 140,457
Valuation of in place leases - Accumulated Amortization(39,665) (38,842)(56,571) (48,961)
$75,772
 $45,234
$105,134
 $124,119
Identified Intangible Liabilities:      
Below-market leases (included in Other Liabilities, net)$36,517
 $39,399
$42,830
 $44,086
Below-market leases - Accumulated Amortization(17,533) (26,013)(19,612) (19,185)
Above-market assumed mortgages (included in Debt, net)42,708
 45,670
34,113
 40,465
Above-market assumed mortgages - Accumulated Amortization(29,176) (31,597)(27,411) (31,114)
$32,516
 $27,459
$29,920
 $34,252
These identified intangible assets and liabilities are amortized over the applicable lease terms or the remaining lives of the assumed mortgages, as applicable.
The net amortization of above-market and below-market leases (decreased) increased rental revenues by $.8(1.7) million, $1.5.6 million and $1.7.8 million in 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, respectively. The significant year over year change in rental revenues from 2014 to 2013 is primarily due to the acquisition of a partner’s 50% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture in December 2013 (see Note 23 for additional information). The estimated net amortization of these intangible assets and liabilities will increasedecrease rental revenues for each of the next five years as follows (in thousands):
2013$482
2014311
2015301
$1,681
2016340
1,574
2017672
1,473
20181,309
2019815
The amortization of the in place lease intangible assets recorded in depreciation and amortization, was $7.812.0 million, $6.211.6 million and $5.97.8 million in 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, respectively. The estimated amortization of this intangible asset will increase depreciation and amortization for each of the next five years as follows (in thousands):
2013$10,751
201410,458
20158,496
$10,756
20165,936
8,161
20175,325
7,635
20187,287
20196,208

6261


The net amortization of above-market and below-market assumed mortgages decreased net interest expense by $2.71.0 million, $2.210.4 million and $3.12.7 million in 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, respectively. The significant year over year change in expense from 2013 to 2014 is primarily due to a $9.7 million write-off in 2013 of an above-market assumed mortgage intangible due to the early payoff of the related mortgage. The estimated net amortization of these intangible assets and liabilities will decrease net interest expense for each of the next five years as follows (in thousands):
2013$1,283
20141,318
2015927
$783
2016509
750
2017630
871
2018978
2019978
Note 7.      Debt
Our debt consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Debt payable to 2038 at 2.6% to 8.8% in 2012 and 1.5% to 8.8% in 2011$2,041,709
 $2,268,668
Debt payable to 2038 at 3.4% to 8.6% in 2014 and 2.6% to 8.6% in 2013, net$1,656,083
 $2,205,104
Unsecured notes payable under credit facilities66,000
 166,500
189,000
 
Debt service guaranty liability74,075
 74,075
72,105
 73,740
Obligations under capital leases21,000
 21,000
21,000
 21,000
Industrial revenue bonds payable to 2015 at 2.4%1,246
 1,594
Total$2,204,030
 $2,531,837
$1,938,188
 $2,299,844
The grouping of total debt between fixed and variable-rate as well as between secured and unsecured is summarized below (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
As to interest rate (including the effects of interest rate contracts):      
Fixed-rate debt$1,992,599
 $2,014,834
$1,651,959
 $2,136,265
Variable-rate debt211,431
 517,003
286,229
 163,579
Total$2,204,030
 $2,531,837
$1,938,188
 $2,299,844
As to collateralization:      
Unsecured debt$1,270,742
 $1,510,932
$1,343,217
 $1,572,057
Secured debt933,288
 1,020,905
594,971
 727,787
Total$2,204,030
 $2,531,837
$1,938,188
 $2,299,844
Effective September 2011, we entered into an amended and restatedWe maintain a $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility.facility, which was last amended and extended on TheApril 18, 2013. This facility expires in September 2015 and April 2017, provides for a one-year extensiontwo consecutive six-month extensions upon our request and borrowing rates that float at a margin over LIBOR plus a facility fee. At TheDecember 31, 2014, the borrowing margin and facility fee, which are priced off a grid that is tied to our senior unsecured credit ratings, which are currently 125115 and 2520 basis points, respectively. The facility also contains a competitive bid feature that will allowallows us to request bids for up to $250 million. Additionally, an accordion feature allows us to increase the facility amount up to $700 million.
Effective May 2010, we entered into an agreement with a bank for an unsecured and uncommitted overnight facility totaling $99 million that we intend to maintainmaintained for cash management purposes. The facility providesprovided for fixed interest rate loans at a 30 day LIBOR rate plus a borrowing margin based on market liquidity.liquidity until expiration. As of January 2, 2015, this facility was canceled and has not been replaced.

6362


The following table discloses certain information regarding our unsecured notes payable under our credit facilities (in thousands, except percentages):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Unsecured revolving credit facility:      
Balance outstanding$30,000
 $145,000
$189,000
 $
Available balance$467,571
 $351,571
306,777
 497,821
Letter of credit outstanding under facility$2,429
 $3,429
4,223
 2,179
Variable interest rate (excluding facility fee)1.1% 1.3%0.8% %
Unsecured and uncommitted overnight facility:      
Balance outstanding$36,000
 $21,500
$
 $
Variable interest rate1.5% 1.5%% %
Both facilities:      
Maximum balance outstanding during the year$303,100
 $330,700
$270,000
 $265,500
Weighted average balance$157,447
 $151,814
151,036
 61,642
Year-to-date weighted average interest rate (excluding facility fee)1.3% 1.5%0.8% 1.0%
Related to a development project in Sheridan, Colorado, we have provided a guaranty for the payment of any debt service shortfalls until a coverage rate of 1.4 is met on tax increment revenue bonds issued in connection with the project. The bonds are to be repaid with incremental sales and property taxes and a PIF to be assessed on current and future retail sales and, to the extent necessary, any amounts we may have to provide under a guaranty. The incremental taxes and PIF are to remain intact until the earlier of the date the bond liability has been paid in full or 2040, as extended by the Agency in April 2011.. Therefore, a debt service guaranty liability equal to the fair value of the amounts funded under the bonds was recorded. For both periods ended atAs of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, we had $74.172.1 million and $73.7 million, respectively, outstanding for the debt service guaranty liability.
In November 2012, we redeemedDuring 2014, $315 million of fixed-rate medium term notes matured and were repaid at a weighted average interest rate of 5.2%, and $100 million of our $54.1 million8.1% of 3.95% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2026, which were outstanding at December 31, 2011. Interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year.
These notes were originally recorded at a discount, which was amortized through July 2011, resulting in an effective interest rate as of December 31, 20112019 were redeemed by us at our option. The majority of 5.34%.
Net interest expense on our 3.95% convertiblethe 8.1% senior unsecured notes is as follows (in thousands):was redeemed at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the redemption date. In conjunction with the redemption in 2014, we wrote off $1.2 million of debt costs. During 2013,
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Interest expense$1,828
 $4,218
 $5,782
Amortization of discount
 1,334
 2,191
Net interest expense$1,828
 $5,552
 $7,973
$173.6 million of fixed-rate medium term notes matured and were repaid at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4%, and a $100 million 6% secured fixed-rate note payable was repaid prior to maturity.
In October 2012,2013, we issued $300250 million of 3.38%4.45% senior unsecured notes maturing in 20222024. The notes were issued at 99.62%99.58% of the principal amount with a yield to maturity of 3.42%4.50%. The net proceeds received of $296.9247.3 million were used to reduce all amounts outstanding under our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility, andnet excess proceeds were invested in short-term instruments and were used to pay down future debt maturities or for general business purposes.
In March 2013, we issued $300 million of 3.5% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2023. The notes were issued at 99.53% of the principal amount with a yield to maturity of 3.56%. The net proceeds received of $296.6 million were used to reduce amounts outstanding under our $500$500 million unsecured revolving credit facility, andwhich included borrowings used to repay ourredeem $54.175 million of our 3.95%6.75% convertible senior unsecured notes.
In August 2011, we entered into a $200 million unsecured term loan; the proceeds of which were used to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility. The initial term of the loan was one year, which we repaid at par after nine months on May 31, 2012 at our option. In addition, $180.6 million fixed-rate medium term notes matured during 2012 at a weighted average interest rate of 5.5%.Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares.
Various leases and properties, and current and future rentals from those leaseleases and properties, collateralize certain debt. At December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, the carrying value of such property aggregated $1.5$1.0 billion and $1.71.2 billion, respectively.

6463


Scheduled principal payments on our debt (excluding $66.0$189.0 million due unsecured notes payable under our credit facilities, $21.0 million of certain capital leases, $9.93.9 million fair value of interest rate contracts, $.9(3.1) million net premium/(discount) on debt, $10.24.3 million of non-cash debt-related items, and $74.172.1 million debt service guaranty liability) are due during the following years (in thousands):
2013$349,108
2014473,103
2015274,707
$225,946
2016223,198
233,152
2017140,830
139,660
201863,057
59,945
2019 (1)
152,211
201953,556
20202,099
34,990
2021957
1,883
2022303,410
304,397
2023301,494
2024251,588
Thereafter39,312
44,309
Total$2,021,992
$1,650,920
(1)
Includes $100.0 million of our 8.1% senior unsecured notes due 2019 which may be redeemed by us at any time on or after September 2014 at our option.
Our various debt agreements contain restrictive covenants, including minimum interest and fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratios, minimum net worth requirements and maximum total debt levels. We believe we were in complianceare not aware of any non-compliance with our public debt and revolving credit facility covenants as of December 31, 20122014.

Note 8.      Derivatives and Hedging
The fair value of all our interest rate contracts was reported as follows (in thousands):
 Assets Liabilities
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Amount 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Amount
Designated Hedges:       
December 31, 2012Other Assets, net $9,926
 Other Liabilities, net $768
December 31, 2011Other Assets, net 10,816
 Other Liabilities, net 674
 Assets Liabilities
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Amount 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Amount
Designated Hedges:       
December 31, 2014Other Assets, net $3,891
 Other Liabilities, net $109
December 31, 2013Other Assets, net 5,282
 Other Liabilities, net 476
The gross presentation, the effects of offsetting for derivatives with a right to offset under master netting agreements and the net presentation of our interest rate contracts is as follows (in thousands):
       
Gross Amounts Not
Offset in Balance
Sheet
  
 
Gross
Amounts
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in
Balance
Sheet
 
Net
Amounts
Presented
in Balance
Sheet
 
Financial
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Amount
December 31, 2014           
Assets$3,891
 $
 $3,891
 $
 $
 $3,891
Liabilities109
 
 109
 
 
 109
            
December 31, 2013           
Assets5,282
 
 5,282
 
 
 5,282
Liabilities476
 
 476
 
 
 476

64


Cash Flow Hedges:
As of December 31, 2012 and 20112014, we had threeone active interest rate contracts designated as cash flow hedgescontract, maturing in December 2015, with an aggregate notional amount of $26.55.2 million that was designated as a cash flow hedge and fixed the interest rate at 2.4%. As of December 31, 2013, we had three interest rate contracts, maturing through September 2017, with an aggregate notional amount of $27.125.8 million, respectively. These contracts have maturities through September 2017 that were designated as cash flow hedges and either fixfixed or capcapped interest rates ranging from 2.3% to 5.0%. We have determined that these contracts are highly effective in offsetting future variable interest cash flows.
During 2013, we settled three forward-starting contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $150.0 million hedging future fixed-rate debt issuances. These contracts fixed the 10-year swap rates at 2.4%. In connection with the October 2013 issuance of unsecured senior notes, we received $6.1 million associated with the settlement of these contracts resulting in a $5.9 million gain in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
As of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, the net gain balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss relating to cash flow interest rate contracts was $7.53.4 million and $10.01.2 million, respectively, and will be reclassified to net interest expense as interest payments are made on our fixed-rate debt. Within the next 12 months, a loss of approximately $2.9.8 million of the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be amortized to net interest expense related to settled interest rate contracts.

65


Summary of cash flow interest rate contract hedging activity is as follows (in thousands):
Derivatives Hedging
Relationships
 
Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized
in Other
Comprehensive
Income on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss) 
Reclassified
from Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss into Income
 
Amount of Gain
(Loss) 
Reclassified
from Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount 
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount 
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of (Gain)
Loss
Recognized
in Other
Comprehensive
Income on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss) 
Reclassified
from Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss into Income
 
Amount of Gain
(Loss) 
Reclassified
from Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount 
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount 
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
Year Ended December 31, 2014 $(131) 
Interest expense,
net
 $(1,682) 
Interest expense,
net
 $(370)
Year Ended December 31, 2013 $(6,423) 
Interest expense,
net
 $(2,537) 
Interest expense,
net
 $238
Year Ended December 31, 2012 $123
 
Interest expense,
net
 $(2,650) 
Interest expense,
net
 $
 $123
 
Interest expense,
net
 $(2,650) 
Interest expense,
net
 $
Year Ended December 31, 2011 $866
 
Interest expense,
net
 $(2,551) 
Interest expense,
net
 $(12)
Year Ended December 31, 2010 $(96) 
Interest expense,
net
 $(2,566) 
Interest expense,
net
 $(27)
Fair Value Hedges:
As of December 31, 2012 and 20112014, we had fourtwo interest rate contracts, maturing through October 2017,, with an aggregate notional amount of $118.1$65.3 million that were designated as fair value hedges and convert fixed interest payments at rates of 7.5% to variable interest payments ranging from 4.2% to 4.3%. As of December 31, 2013, we had four$119.3interest rate contracts, maturing through October 2017, with an aggregate notional amount of $116.7 million, respectively, that were designated as fair value hedges and convert fixed interest payments at rates from 4.2% to 7.5% to variable interest payments ranging from .3%.2% to 4.3% and .5% to 4.4%, respectively.. We have determined that our fair value hedges are highly effective in limiting our risk of changes in the fair value of fixed-rate notes attributable to changes in interest rates.
A summary of the changes in fair value ofimpact on net income for our interest rate contracts is as follows (in thousands):
Gain (Loss)
on
Contracts
 
Gain (Loss)
on
Borrowings
 
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
 in Income
Gain (Loss) 
on
Contracts
 
Gain (Loss) 
on
Borrowings
 
Net Settlements
and Accruals
on Contracts (1)
 
Amount of Gain 
(Loss)
Recognized in
Income (2)
Year Ended December 31, 2014       
Interest expense, net$(1,386) $1,386
 $2,179
 $2,179
Year Ended December 31, 2013       
Interest expense, net(4,643) 4,643
 4,082
 4,082
Year Ended December 31, 2012            
Interest expense, net$(860) $860
 $
(860) 860
 6,749
 6,749
Year Ended December 31, 2011     
Interest expense, net$3,676
 $(3,676) $
Year Ended December 31, 2010     
Interest expense, net$17,511
 $(16,547) $964
A summary of our fair value interest rate contract hedges impact on net income is as follows (in thousands):
Derivatives Hedging Relationships 
Location of Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 
Amount of 
Gain 
(Loss)
Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
Location of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount 
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount 
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
Year Ended December 31, 2012 Interest expense, net $3,152
   $
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Interest expense, net $7,748
   $
Year Ended December 31, 2010 (1)
 Interest expense, net $24,483
 Interest expense, net $964
___________________
(1)
ForAmounts in this caption include gain (loss) recognized in income on derivatives and net cash settlements.
(2)No ineffectiveness was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized a net reduction in interest expense of $6.7 million related to fair value hedges that were terminated during 2010, which includes net settlements and any amortization adjustment of the basis of the hedged item.respective periods.


6665


Note 9.      Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest
We issued $150 million and $200 million of depositary shares on June 6, 2008 and January 30, 2007, respectively. Each depositary share represents one-hundredth of a Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share. The depositary shares are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, for cash at a redemption price of $25 per depositary share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. The depositary shares are not convertible or exchangeable for any of our other property or securities. The Series F Preferred Shares pay a 6.5% annual dividend and have a liquidation value of $2,500 per share. The Series F Preferred Shares issued in June 2008 were issued at a discount, resulting in an effective rate of 8.25%.
In July 2004, we issuedWe exercised our option to redeem a portion of the Series F depositary shares totaling $72.5200 million of depositary shares with each share representing one-hundredth of a Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share. The depositary shares were redeemed on November 21, 2012June 5, 2013, at our option, for cash at a redemption price of $25 per depositary share or $72.5 million, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.. Upon the redemption of these shares, a portion of the related original issuance costs oftotaling $2.515.7 million werewas reported as a deduction in arriving at net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders. The Series E Preferred Shares paid aoutstanding 6.95% annual dividend, had a liquidation value of $2,500 per share and were not convertible or exchangeable for any of our property or securities.
In April 2003, we issued $75150 million of depositary shares with each share representing one-thirtieth of a Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share. The depositary shares are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, for cash at a redemption price of $25 per depositary share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. The depositary shares are not convertible or exchangeable for any of our property or securities. The Series DF Preferred Shares pay a 6.75%6.5% annual dividend and have a liquidation value of $7502,500 per share. Of these outstanding shares, $64.3 million were issued at a discount and have an effective rate of 8.25%.
On February 14,In 2013, and 2012, we calledredeemed all of our 6.75%outstanding Series D and Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, with a redemption value of $75.0 million, which will settle on March 18, 2013.respectively.
The following table discloses the cumulative redeemable preferred dividends declared per share:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2014 2013 2012
Series of Preferred Shares:      
Series D $
 $13.08
 $50.63
Series E 
 
 162.16
Series F 162.50
 160.24
 162.50
As part of our evaluation of our capital plan, we may consider redeeming the remaining Series F Preferred Shares.

Note 10.      Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
Common dividends declared per share were $1.55, $1.22 and $1.16 for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The regular dividend rate per share for our common shares for each quarter of 20122014 and 20112013 was $.290$.325 and $.275.305, respectively. Also in December 2014, we paid a special dividend for our common shares in the amount of $.25 per share, which was due to the significant gains on dispositions of property. Subsequent to December 31, 2012,2014, our Board of Trust Managers approved an increase to our quarterly2015 first quarter dividend rate to $.305$.345 per share.

Note 11.      Noncontrolling Interests
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in our ownership interest in subsidiaries on the equity attributable to us as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Net income adjusted for noncontrolling interests$146,640
 $15,621
 $46,206
$288,008
 $220,262
 $146,640
Transfers from the noncontrolling interests:          
Increase in equity for operating partnership units
 
 746
Net increase (decrease) in equity for the acquisition of
noncontrolling interests
394
 1,668
 (879)11,015
 (16,177) 394
Change from net income adjusted for noncontrolling interests
and transfers from the noncontrolling interests
$147,034
 $17,289
 $46,073
$299,023
 $204,085
 $147,034
Note 12.      Leasing Operations
The terms of our leases range from less than one year for smaller tenant spaces to over 25 years for larger tenant spaces. In addition to minimum lease payments, most of the leases provide for contingent rentals (payments for real estate taxes, maintenance and insurance by lessees and an amount based on a percentage of the tenants’ sales).

6766


Future minimum rental income from non-cancelable tenant leases, which does not includeexcluding leases associated with property held for sale and estimated contingent rentals, at December 31, 20122014 is as follows (in thousands):
2013$383,026
2014332,261
2015276,734
$360,860
2016220,273
311,436
2017163,197
254,274
2018202,296
2019153,214
Thereafter588,498
553,061
Total$1,963,989
$1,835,141
Contingent rentals for the year ended December 31, are as follows (in thousands):
2012$112,431
2011112,414
2010115,488

2014$109,714
2013112,551
2012112,431
Note 13.      Impairment
The following impairment charges were recorded on the following assets based on the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and the estimated fair value (see Note 24 for additional fair value information) (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Continuing operations:          
Land held for development and undeveloped land (1)
$
 $23,646
 $2,827
$
 $2,358
 $
Property marketed for sale or sold (2)
3,374
 11,439
 2,350
808
 56
 2,977
Investments in real estate joint ventures and partnerships (3)
6,608
 1,752
 15,825

 
 6,608
Tax increment revenue bonds and notes (4)

 18,737
 12,315
Other216
 165
 
Total reported in continuing operations9,982
 55,574
 33,317
1,024
 2,579
 9,585
Discontinued operations:          
Property held for sale or sold(4)5,454
 20,300
 

 236
 5,851
Total impairment charges15,436
 75,874
 33,317
1,024
 2,815
 15,436
Other financial statement captions impacted by impairment:          
Equity in loss of real estate joint ventures and partnerships, net19,946
 7,022
 115
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 (4,459) 
Equity in earnings (losses) of real estate joint ventures and partnerships, net305
 395
 19,946
Net impact of impairment charges$35,382
 $78,437
 $33,432
$1,329
 $3,210
 $35,382
___________________
(1)Impairment was prompted by changes in management's plans for these properties, recent comparable market transactions and/or a change in market conditions.
(2)These chargesThe charge for 2014 was based primarily on third party offers. Charges for 2013 and 2012 resulted from changes in management’s plans for these properties, primarily the marketing of these properties for sale. Also, included in this caption are impairments associated with dispositions that did not qualify to be reported in discontinued operations.
(3)
Amounts reported in 2012 were based on third party offers to buy our interests in industrial real estate joint ventures. Amounts reported in 2011 relate to market conditions. The amount reported in 2010 represents an impairment loss recognized in connection with the revaluation of our 50% equity interest in a development project in Sheridan, Colorado, as a result of our assumption of control of the project as of April 1, 2010.
(4)
During 2011, the tax increment revenue bondsAmounts reported were remarketed by the Agency. All of the outstanding bonds were recalled, and new bonds were issued. We recorded an $18.7 million net credit lossbased on the exchange of bonds associated with our investment in the subordinated tax increment revenue bonds. In 2010, we wrote down the value of our subordinated tax increment revenue bonds and notes due to change in holding status of the bonds.
third party offers.


68


Note 14.      Federal      Income Tax Considerations
We qualify as a REIT under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and therefore, no tax is imposed on our taxable income distributed to shareholders. To maintain our REIT status, we must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders and meet certain income source and investment restriction requirements. Our shareholders must report their share of income distributed in the form of dividends.

67


Taxable income differs from net income for financial reporting purposes principally because of differences in the timing of recognition of depreciation, rental revenue, interest expense, compensation expense, impairment losses and gain from sales of property. As a result of these differences, the tax basisbook value of our net fixed assets exceedsis in excess of (less than) the book valuetax basis by $7.032.0 million and $37.0(88.0) million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively.
The following table reconciles net income adjusted for noncontrolling interests to REIT taxable income (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Net income adjusted for noncontrolling interests$146,640
 $15,621
 $46,206
$288,008
 $220,262
 $146,640
Net loss of taxable REIT subsidiary included above11,457
 32,043
 22,450
Net (income) loss of taxable REIT subsidiary included above(4,092) (4,684) 11,457
Net income from REIT operations158,097
 47,664
 68,656
283,916
 215,578
 158,097
Book depreciation and amortization including discontinued
operations
148,413
 157,290
 151,108
150,616
 157,665
 148,413
Tax depreciation and amortization(92,797) (100,633) (95,848)(90,328) (90,047) (92,797)
Book/tax difference on gains/losses from capital transactions(55,242) (13,398) 1,233
(87,387) (33,969) (55,242)
Deferred/prepaid/above and below market rents, net(4,264) (13,088) (5,076)
Deferred/prepaid/above and below-market rents, net(3,617) (6,429) (4,264)
Impairment loss from REIT operations including discontinued
operations
11,396
 58,353
 28,376
942
 474
 11,396
Other book/tax differences, net1,430
 (3,652) (22,785)(6,399) (9,695) 1,430
REIT taxable income167,033
 132,536
 125,664
247,743
 233,577
 167,033
Dividends paid deduction(1)(173,202) (165,721) (125,664)(247,743) (233,577) (173,202)
Dividends paid in excess of taxable income$(6,169) $(33,185) $
$
 $
 $(6,169)
The dividends paid deduction in 2010 includes designated dividends of $3.8 million from 2011.___________________
(1)For 2014 and 2013, the dividends paid deduction includes designated dividends of $114.0 million and $67.7 million from 2015 and 2014, respectively.
For federal income tax purposes, the cash dividends distributed to common shareholders are characterized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Ordinary income92.8% 100.0% 79.1%54.0% 50.5% 92.8%
Capital gain distributions7.2% % 20.9%46.0% 49.5% 7.2%
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

6968


Our deferred tax assets and liabilities, including a valuation allowance, consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Deferred tax assets:      
Impairment loss (1)
$16,951
 $20,450
$13,900
 $17,692
Allowance on other assets1,519
 1,528
91
 1,168
Interest expense11,417
 8,318
12,701
 12,842
Net operating loss carryforward8,642
 4,870
Net operating loss carryforwards (2)
11,024
 8,814
Book-tax basis differential1,148
 1,132
1,693
 886
Other173
 182
412
 241
Total deferred tax assets39,850
 36,480
39,821
 41,643
Valuation allowance (2)(3)
(28,376) (24,595)(27,539) (30,541)
Total deferred tax assets, net of allowance$11,474
 $11,885
$12,282
 $11,102
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Straight-line rentals$977
 $1,612
$48
 $696
Book-tax basis differential2,339
 3,553
7,402
 8,252
Other2
 1
387
 167
Total deferred tax liabilities$3,318
 $5,166
$7,837
 $9,115
___________________
(1)Impairment losses will not be recognized until the related properties are sold and realization is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in the year the property is sold.
(2)
We have net operating loss carryforwards of $31.5 million that expire between the years of 2029 and 2034.
(3)Management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets, which primarily consists of impairment losses, interest expense and net operating losses, will not be realized and established a valuation allowance. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.
We are subject to federal, state and local income taxes and have recorded an income tax (benefit) provision as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Federal income tax benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary (1)
$(1,437) $(916) $(1,181)
Net income (loss) before taxes of taxable REIT subsidiary$1,446
 $10,688
 $(12,894)
Federal provision (benefit) at statutory rate of 35%$506
 $3,741
 $(4,513)
Valuation allowance (decrease) increase(3,003) 2,165
 3,781
Other(149) 98
 (705)
Federal income tax (benefit) provision of taxable REIT subsidiary (1)
(2,646) 6,004
 (1,437)
Texas franchise tax (2)
1,784
 1,373
 1,422
1,403
 1,370
 1,784
Total$347
 $457
 $241
$(1,243) $7,374
 $347
___________________
(1)All periods presented are open for examination by the IRS.
(2)For all periods presented, amounts include the effects that are reported in discontinued operations. See Note 15 for additional information.
Also, a current tax obligation of $1.91.5 million and $1.51.6 million has been recorded at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, respectively, in association with these taxes.


69


Note 15.      Discontinued Operations
During 20122014, we sold 27 shopping12 centers, 54 industrial properties,three in each of Georgia and we assigned a 75% consolidated joint venture interest to our partner. Of these dispositions, 55 were locatedTexas and two in Texas, sixeach inof Florida, and Georgia, three in North Carolina, two each in Colorado, Louisiana and Virginia and one each in Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Oklahoma and Tennessee. As part of these 2012North Carolina. These dispositions we sold, in May 2012, a portfolio of 52 wholly-owned industrial properties in order to exitrepresent the industrial real estate market and further align and strengthen our position solelycenters that were classified as a retail REIT.

70


As of December 31, 2012, we reclassified two previously identifieddiscontinued operations or held for sale shopping centersprior to operations. Several letters of intent on these properties did not come to fruition over the past year and current market conditions for these properties changed since they were first classified as held for sale in 2011. The net book value of $10.0 million associated with these properties was reclassified to operating assets as of December 31, 2012. In addition, operating (loss) income of $(.1) million and $.8 millionApril 1, 2014, our adoption date for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was reclassified fromnew qualification criteria for discontinued operations to continuing operations.(see Note 2 for further information). Since adoption, no other dispositions have qualified as discontinued operations under the new guidance.
During No2013 properties were classified as held for sale as, we sold 20 centers, nine in Texas, three in each of Florida and North Carolina, two in New Mexico and one in each of California, Nevada and Tennessee. As of December 31, 2012 as the potential disposition of assets currently being marketed was not deemed probable.
During 20112013, we sold three industrial properties, of which two were located in Georgia and one in Texas, and eight shopping centers, of which five were located in Texas and one each in Florida, Kansas and North Carolina. As of December 31, 2011, we classified as held for sale seven shoppingeight centers that consisted of property and accumulated depreciation totaling $155.0 million and $32.4 million, respectively, with a net book value of $73.2 million, of which three were located in Georgia, two in each of Florida and Texas and one each in Arizona, Florida, Illinois and North Carolina.
Included in theExcluding property held for sale at December 31, 2013, our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011 were $673.82013 included $68.6 million of property and $156.2$13.2 million of accumulated depreciation related to retail and industrial propertiesthe four centers that were sold and classified as discontinued operations during 2012.2014.
The operating results of these propertiescenters have been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as follows (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Revenues, net$39,832
 $82,083
 $83,414
Depreciation and amortization(7,430) (25,941) (25,805)
Operating expenses(7,588) (15,010) (14,874)
Real estate taxes, net(5,632) (11,683) (11,750)
Impairment loss(5,454) (20,300) 
General and administrative(2,198) (60) (56)
Interest, net(651) (2,019) (3,403)
Interest and other income, net
 
 2
Gain on acquisition (see Note 23)
 4,559
 
Provision for income taxes(268) (311) (323)
Operating income from discontinued operations10,611
 11,318
 27,205
Gain on sale of property from discontinued operations68,589
 10,273
 1,093
Income from discontinued operations$79,200
 $21,591
 $28,298
We do not allocate other consolidated interest to discontinued operations because the interest savings to be realized from the proceeds of the sale of these operations is not material.

 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Revenues, net$1,062
 $43,452
 $92,193
Depreciation and amortization(260) (10,902) (20,710)
Operating expenses(285) (7,457) (17,090)
Real estate taxes, net(136) (4,766) (11,643)
Impairment loss
 (236) (5,851)
General and administrative(2) (24) (2,214)
Interest, net(19) (7,527) (10,215)
Interest and other income, net
 2
 1
Gain on acquisition
 
 1,869
Provision for income taxes(18) (328) (422)
Operating income from discontinued operations342
 12,214
 25,918
Gain on sale of property from discontinued operations44,582
 119,203
 68,619
Income from discontinued operations$44,924
 $131,417
 $94,537

7170


Note 16.      Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Non-cash investing and financing activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Exchange of interests in real estate joint ventures and partnerships
for common shares
$
 $
 $746
Accrued property construction costs5,811
 7,535
 6,878
$6,265
 $5,175
 $5,811
Increase (decrease) in equity for the acquisition of noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate joint ventures
394
 1,668
 (879)11,015
 (16,177) 394
Reduction of debt service guaranty liability (see Note 7)
 (22,925) 
Decrease in notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and
partnerships in association with our contribution in an
unconsolidated real estate joint venture
(6,431) 
 
Reduction of debt service guaranty liability(1,635) (335) 
Property acquisitions and investments in unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures:
          
Increase in property, net16,665
 4,749
 18,376
(Decrease) increase in real estate joint ventures and
partnerships - investments
(3,825) 490
 
(Decrease) increase in property, net
 43,122
 16,665
Decrease in notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and
partnerships

 (8,750) 
Increase (decrease) in real estate joint ventures and
partnerships - investments

 1,746
 (3,825)
Increase in restricted deposits and mortgage escrows395
 
 498

 
 395
Increase in debt, net40,644
 
 27,302

 60,515
 40,644
Increase in security deposits1,332
 87
 302

 187
 1,332
Increase in noncontrolling interests968
 9,949
 

 16,177
 968
Sale of property and property interest:          
Decrease in property, net(2,855) 
 (37,969)(127,837) 
 (2,855)
(Decrease) increase in real estate joint ventures and
partnerships - investments
(95) 
 9,840
Decrease in real estate joint ventures and partnerships
- investments
(17) 
 (95)
Decrease in restricted deposits and mortgage escrows(204) 
 

 
 (204)
Decrease in other, net(34) 
 
Decrease in debt, net due to debt assumption(3,366) 
 (28,129)(11,069) 
 (3,366)
Decrease in security deposits(11) 
 
(459) 
 (11)
Decrease in noncontrolling interests(95) 
 
(155,278) 
 (95)
Consolidation of joint ventures (see Note 23):          
Increase in property, net
 32,307
 32,940

 60,992
 
Decrease in notes receivable from real estate joint ventures
and partnerships

 (21,872) (123,912)
 (54,838) 
Increase in other assets
 
 148,255
Decrease in real estate joint ventures and
partnerships - investments

 (10,092) 

 (11,518) 
Increase in debt, net
 
 101,741
Decrease in other liabilities, net
 
 (21,858)
Decrease in noncontrolling interests
 
 (18,573)
Increase in security deposits
 164
 

7271


Note 17.      Earnings Per Share
Earnings per common share – basic is computed using net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic. Earnings per common share – diluted includeincludes the effect of potentially dilutive securities. Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders includes gain on sale of property in accordance with SECSecurities and Exchange Commission guidelines. The components of earnings per common share – basic and diluted for the prior periods have been recast to conform with discontinued operations. Earnings per common share – basic and diluted components for the periods indicated are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Numerator:          
Continuing Operations:
 



 


Income (loss) from continuing operations$72,187
 $(6,531) $20,935
Income from continuing operations$116,365
 $132,977
 $56,880
Gain on sale of property1,034
 1,679
 2,005
146,290
 762
 1,004
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(5,781) (1,118) (5,032)(19,623) (5,545) (4,527)
Dividends on preferred shares(34,930) (35,476) (35,476)(10,840) (18,173) (34,930)
Redemption costs of preferred shares(2,500) 
 

 (17,944) (2,500)
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders – basic and diluted
$30,010
 $(41,446) $(17,568)
Income from continuing operations attributable to
common shareholders – basic
232,192
 92,077
 15,927
Income attributable to operating partnership units2,171
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to
common shareholders – diluted
$234,363
 $92,077
 $15,927
Discontinued Operations:          
Income from discontinued operations$44,924
 $131,417
 $94,537
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests52
 (39,349) (1,254)
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders – basic and diluted
$79,200
 $21,591
 $28,298
$44,976
 $92,068
 $93,283
Net Income:     
Net income attributable to common shareholders – basic$277,168
 $184,145
 $109,210
Net income attributable to common shareholders – diluted$279,339
 $184,145
 $109,210
Denominator:          
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic120,696
 120,331
 119,935
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic121,542
 121,269
 120,696
Effect of dilutive securities:          
Share options and awards1,009
 
 845
1,331
 1,191
 1,009
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted121,705
 120,331
 120,780
Operating partnership units1,497
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted124,370
 122,460
 121,705
Anti-dilutive securities of our common shares, which are excluded from the calculation of earnings per common share – diluted, are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Share options (1)
2,354
 3,158
 3,537
908
 1,929
 2,354
Operating partnership units1,578
 1,617
 1,662

 1,554
 1,578
Share options and awards
 894
 
Total anti-dilutive securities3,932
 5,669
 5,199
908
 3,483
 3,932
___________________
(1)Exclusion results as exercise prices were greater than the average market price for each respective period.


72


Note 18.      Share Options and Awards
In April 2011, our Long-Term Incentive Plan for the issuance of options and share awards expired, and issued options of 3.42.3 million remain outstanding as of December 31, 20122014.
In May 2010, our shareholders approved the adoption of the Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan, under which 3.0 million of our common shares were reserved for issuance, and options and share awards of 1.91.4 million are available for future grant at December 31, 20122014. This plan expires in May 2020.

73


Compensation expense, net of forfeitures, associated with share options and restricted shares totaled $7.9 million in 2014, $8.8 million in 2013 and $9.7 million in 2012, of which $6.42.3 million in 20112014 and, $4.92.4 million in 20102013, of which and $2.0 million in 2012, $1.5 million in 2011 and $1.2 million in 2010 was capitalized. The significant year over year change in expense is primarily due to an increased number of employees who became retirement eligible, requiring the related expense to be recognized immediately.
Options
The fair value of share options issued prior to 2012 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method based on the expected weighted average assumptions in the following table. The fair value and weighted average assumptions were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2011 2010
Fair value per share option$5.68
 $5.42
Dividend yield5.3% 5.3%
Expected volatility39.6% 38.8%
Expected life (in years)6.2
 6.2
Risk-free interest rate2.4% 2.9%
assumptions.
Following is a summary of the option activity for the three years ended December 31, 20122014:
Shares
Under
Option
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Under
Option
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding, January 1, 20104,436,143
 $27.44
Granted504,781
 22.68
Forfeited or expired(22,973) 21.29
Exercised(303,679) 17.32
Outstanding, December 31, 20104,614,272
 27.62
Granted483,459
 24.87
Forfeited or expired(230,232) 22.81
Exercised(259,796) 18.34
Outstanding, December 31, 20114,607,703
 28.09
Outstanding, January 1, 20124,607,703
 $28.09
Forfeited or expired(40,390) 27.12
(40,390) 27.12
Exercised(481,611) 20.70
(481,611) 20.70
Outstanding, December 31, 20124,085,702
 $28.98
4,085,702
 28.98
Forfeited or expired(79,108) 32.61
Exercised(462,848) 26.95
Outstanding, December 31, 20133,543,746
 29.16
Forfeited or expired(307,413) 39.73
Exercised(339,210) 22.98
Outstanding, December 31, 20142,897,123
 $28.76
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $4.2 million in 2014, $3.2 million in 2013 and $3.0 million in 2012, $1.9 million in 2011 and $1.8 million in 2010. As of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, there was approximately $2.2$0.5 million and $3.8$1.1 million,, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share options, which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average of 1.60.8 years and 2.41.1 years, respectively.

74


The following table summarizes information about share options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 20122014:
Range of
Exercise Prices
 Outstanding Exercisable Outstanding Exercisable
Number 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
 Number 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
Number 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
 Number 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
$11.85 - $17.78  809,936
 6.2 years $11.85
   528,039
 $11.85
 6.2 years   618,556
 4.2 years $11.85
   618,556
 $11.85
 4.2 years  
$17.79 - $26.69  921,177
 7.8 years $23.76
   307,792
 $23.40
 7.7 years   801,760
 5.8 years $23.78
   584,698
 $23.64
 5.7 years  
$26.70 - $40.05  1,883,893
 3.2 years $34.27
   1,755,080
 $34.42
 3.1 years   1,015,468
 2.2 years $34.51
   1,015,468
 $34.51
 2.2 years  
$40.06 - $49.62  470,696
 3.9 years $47.46
   470,696
 $47.46
 3.9 years   461,339
 1.9 years $47.46
   461,339
 $47.46
 1.9 years  
Total 4,085,702
 4.9 years $28.98
 $
 3,061,607
 $31.42
 4.2 years $
 2,897,123
 3.6 years $28.76
 $17,846
 2,680,061
 $29.14
 3.4 years $15,491

73


Restricted Shares
The fair value of the market-based share awards was estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo valuation model based on the following assumptions:
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2014
Minimum MaximumMinimum Maximum
Dividend yield0.0% 4.4%0.0% 4.1%
Expected volatility27.7% 51.6%14.8% 25.3%
Expected life (in years)NA
 3
N/A
 3
Risk-free interest rate0.1% 0.4%0.1% 0.8%
A summary of the status of unvested restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 20122014 is as follows:
Unvested
Restricted
Share
Awards
 
Weighted
Average 
Grant
Date Fair 
Value
Unvested
Restricted
Share
Awards
 
Weighted
Average 
Grant
Date Fair 
Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2012407,328
 $20.43
Outstanding, January 1, 2014575,167
 $26.54
Granted:      
Service-based awards132,923
 24.95
112,329
 30.24
Market-based awards relative to FTSE NAREIT U.S. Shopping Center
Index
57,650
 26.45
49,065
 33.88
Market-based awards relative to three-year absolute TSR57,650
 27.65
49,065
 27.63
Trust manager awards28,263
 27.19
29,043
 31.00
Vested(173,237) 21.62
(119,858) 21.67
Forfeited(14,006) 22.22
(1,006) 28.11
Outstanding, December 31, 2012496,571
 $23.10
Outstanding, December 31, 2014693,805
 $28.76
As of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, there was approximately $4.72.7 million and $5.03.9 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted shares, which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average of 1.90.9 years and 2.31.4 years, respectively.


7574


Note 19.      Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plans:
Effective April 1, 2002, we converted a noncontributory pension plan to a noncontributory cash balance retirement plan under which each participant received an actuarially determined opening balance. Certain participants were grandfathered under the prior pension plan formula. In addition to this plan, effective September 1, 2002, we established two separate and independent nonqualified SRP for certain employees. Effective January 1, 2012, the SRP were amended and designated as defined contribution plans.
The estimated net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $1.5 million.
The following tables summarize changes in the benefit obligation, the plan assets and the funded status of our pension plans as well as the components of net periodic benefit costs, including key assumptions (in thousands). The measurement dates for plan assets and obligations were December 31, 20122014 and 20112013.
 December 31,
 2014 2013
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$38,072
 $42,530
Service cost1,008
 1,281
Interest cost1,800
 1,544
Actuarial loss (gain) (1)
11,020
 (5,807)
Benefit payments(1,682) (1,476)
Benefit obligation at end of year$50,218
 $38,072
Change in Plan Assets:   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$39,327
 $32,161
Actual return on plan assets2,861
 6,842
Employer contributions2,100
 1,800
Benefit payments(1,682) (1,476)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$42,606
 $39,327
(Unfunded) funded status at end of year (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in 2014 and other assets in 2013)$(7,612) $1,255
Accumulated benefit obligation$50,104
 $37,885
Net loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss$16,508
 $5,775
___________________
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$68,390
 $57,875
Service cost1,314
 3,335
Interest cost1,578
 3,454
Actuarial loss2,005
 5,576
Plan amendment (see Note 1)(29,494) 
Benefit payments(1,263) (1,850)
Benefit obligation at end of year$42,530
 $68,390
Change in Plan Assets:   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$27,649
 $27,026
Actual return on plan assets3,275
 (429)
Employer contributions2,500
 2,902
Benefit payments(1,263) (1,850)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$32,161
 $27,649
Unfunded Status at End of Year:   
Retirement Plan (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses)$10,369
 $11,247
SRP (included in other net liabilities and see Note 1)
 29,494
Total unfunded$10,369
 $40,741
Accumulated benefit obligation$42,178
 $68,075
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:   
Net loss$17,254
 $17,844
Prior service credit
 (117)
Total amount recognized$17,254
 $17,727

76


(1)The year over year change in actuarial loss is due primarily to the application of a new mortality rate table, a decrease in the discount rate and demographic changes.
The following is the required information for other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive incomeloss (income) (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Net loss$979
 $8,234
 $1,132
Amortization of net loss(1,569) (685) (744)
Amortization of prior service cost117
 117
 117
Total recognized in other comprehensive income$(473) $7,666
 $505
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and other
comprehensive income
$1,622
 $12,794
 $5,704
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Net loss (gain)$11,118
 $(10,200) $979
Amortization of net loss (1)
(385) (1,279) (1,569)
Amortization of prior service cost
 
 117
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)$10,733
 $(11,479) $(473)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and other
comprehensive loss (income)
$10,967
 $(9,824) $1,622
___________________
(1)The estimated net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $1.3 million.

75


The following is the required information for plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Projected benefit obligation$42,530
 $68,390
$50,218
 N/A
Accumulated benefit obligation42,178
 68,075
50,104
 N/A
Fair value of plan assets32,161
 27,649
42,606
 N/A
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Service cost$1,314
 $3,335
 $3,325
$1,008
 $1,281
 $1,314
Interest cost1,578
 3,454
 3,212
1,800
 1,544
 1,578
Expected return on plan assets(2,249) (2,229) (1,965)(2,959) (2,449) (2,249)
Prior service cost(117) (117) (117)
 
 (117)
Recognized loss1,569
 685
 744
385
 1,279
 1,569
Total$2,095
 $5,128
 $5,199
$234
 $1,655
 $2,095
The assumptions used to develop periodic expense for the plans are shown below:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Discount rate – Retirement Plan4.19% 5.30% 5.82%
Salary scale increases – Retirement Plan3.50% 4.00% 4.00%
Salary scale increases – SRP (see Note 1)% 5.00% 5.00%
Long-term rate of return on assets – Retirement Plan8.00% 8.00% 8.00%
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Discount rate4.70% 3.87% 4.19%
Salary scale increases3.50% 3.50% 3.50%
Long-term rate of return on assets7.50% 7.50% 8.00%
The selection of the discount rate is made annually after comparison to yields based on high quality fixed-income investments. The salary scale is the composite rate which reflects anticipated inflation, merit increases, and promotions for the group of covered participants. The long-term rate of return is a composite rate for the trust. It is derived as the sum of the percentages invested in each principal asset class included in the portfolio multiplied by their respective expected rates of return. We considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. This analysis resulted in the selection of 8.0%7.50% as the long-term rate of return assumption for 20122014.

77


The assumptions used to develop the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations for the plans are shown below:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012 2011 2010
Discount rate – Retirement Plan3.87% 4.19% 5.30%
Salary scale increases – Retirement Plan3.50% 3.50% 4.00%
Salary scale increases – SRP (see Note 1)% 5.00% 5.00%
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Discount rate3.83% 4.70% 3.87%
Salary scale increases3.50% 3.50% 3.50%

76


The expected contribution to be paid for the Retirement Plan by us during 20132015 is approximately $2.0 million.$2.0 million. The expected benefit payments for the next 10 years for the Retirement Plan is as follows (in thousands):
2013$1,631
20142,452
20152,431
$2,250
20161,814
2,193
20171,954
2,140
2018-202210,691
20181,998
20192,404
2020-202412,513
The participant data used in determining the liabilities and costs for the Retirement Plan was collected as of January 1, 20122014, and no significant changes have occurred through December 31, 20122014.
At December 31, 20122014, our investment asset allocation compared to our benchmarking allocation model for our plan assets was as follows:
Portfolio BenchmarkPortfolio Benchmark
Cash and Short-Term Investments8% 6%6% 6%
U.S. Stocks44% 52%60% 61%
Non - U.S. Stocks16% 10%
Bonds31% 32%
Other1% 
International Stocks13% 11%
U.S. Bonds18% 19%
International Bonds3% 3%
Total100% 100%100% 100%
The fair value of plan assets was determined based on publicly quoted market prices for identical assets, which are classified as Level 1 observable inputs. The allocation of the fair value of plan assets was as follows:
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Cash and short-term investments3% 3%
Large company funds20% 21%
Mid company funds8% 7%
Small company funds6% 4%
International funds14% 15%
Fixed income funds35% 36%
Growth funds14% 14%
Total100% 100%
 December 31,
 2014 2013
Cash and Short-Term Investments18% 3%
Large Company Funds35% 31%
Mid Company Funds6% 8%
Small Company Funds6% 8%
International Funds10% 11%
Fixed Income Funds17% 21%
Growth Funds8% 18%
Total100% 100%
Concentrations of risk within our equity portfolio are investments classified within the following sectors: technology, industrial, financial services, consumer cyclical goods, healthcare and healthcare,industrial, which represents approximately 19%17%, 12%16%, 14%15%, 13%15% and 13%12% of total equity investments, respectively.

78


Defined Contribution Plans:
Compensation expense related to our defined contribution plans was $3.33.2 million in 2012 and2014, $.93.1 million in both 20112013 and 2010.$3.3 million in 2012.

Note 20.      Related Parties
Through our management activities and transactions with our real estate joint ventures and partnerships, we had net accounts receivable of $1.81.5 million and $2.21.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, respectively. We also had accounts payable and accrued expenses of $6.3$6.0 million and $8.2$5.6 million outstanding as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, we recorded joint venture fee income of $4.6 million, $5.0 million and $6.1 million, respectively.

77


In 2014, we completed the dissolution of our consolidated real estate joint venture with Hines Retail REIT (“Hines”), in which we owned a 30% interest. At $6.1 millionDecember 31, 2013, this joint venture held a portfolio of $6.013 properties located in Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida and North Carolina with $172.9 million in total assets and $11.1 million of debt, net, which was assumed by Hines. This transaction was completed through the distribution of five properties to us, resulting in an increase to our equity of $11.0 million, and $5.8 millioneight properties to Hines. The eight properties distributed to Hines were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2013, respectively.and we realized a $23.3 million gain in discontinued operations associated with this transaction.
In February 2012,2013, we sold our 47.8%10% interest in two unconsolidated tenancy-in-common arrangements to our partner for approximately $8.9 million. Also, we received cash, real property and our partner’s interest in two consolidated joint ventures in exchange for our interest in two unconsolidated joint ventures and the payment of a note receivable (see Note 21 for additional information under Litigation). Furthermore, we acquired our partner’s 50% unconsolidated joint venture interest in a Colorado development project to our partner with gross sales proceeds totaling California property.$29.1 million, which includes the assumption of our share of debt, generating a gain of $3.5 million.
In November 2012, we sold three unconsolidated joint venture interests, ranging from 20% to 50%, in nine industrial properties to our partner with gross sales proceeds totaling $20.9 million, which includes the assumption of our share of debt, generating a gain of $8.6 million.

Note 21.      Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
We are engaged in the operation of shopping centers, which are either owned or, with respect to certain shopping centers, operated under long-term ground leases. These ground leases expire at various dates through 2069, with renewal options. Space in our shopping centers is leased to tenants pursuant to agreements that provide for terms ranging generally from one year to 25 years and, in some cases, for annual rentals subject to upward adjustments based on operating expense levels, sales volume, or contractual increases as defined in the lease agreements.
Scheduled minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable operating leases in which we are the lessee, principally for shopping center ground leases, for the subsequent five years and thereafter ending December 31, are as follows (in thousands):
2013$3,652
20143,403
20153,187
$2,973
20163,068
2,851
20172,890
2,672
20182,636
20192,530
Thereafter132,052
117,642
Total$148,252
$131,304
Rental expense for operating leases was, in millions: $5.3 in 2014; $5.6 in 2013 and $5.7 in 2012; $5.4 in 2011 and $5.3 in 2010.
The scheduled future minimum revenues under subleases, applicable to the ground lease rentals, above, under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant leases, assuming no new or renegotiated leases or option extensions for the subsequent five years and thereafter ending December 31, are as follows (in thousands):
2013$41,562
201435,831
201529,230
$27,605
201625,165
25,537
201720,090
22,646
201819,732
201914,052
Thereafter81,261
58,085
Total$233,139
$167,657

79


Property under capital leases that is included in buildings and improvements consisted of two shopping centers totaling $16.8 million at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013. Amortization of property under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense, and the balance of accumulated depreciation associated with these capital leases at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 was $11.413.0 million and $10.612.2 million, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under these capital leases total $32.037.8 million of which $11.016.8 million represents interest. Accordingly, the present value of the net minimum lease payments was $21.0 million at December 31, 20122014.

78


The annual future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 20122014 are as follows (in thousands):
2013$1,816
20141,825
20151,834
$1,834
20161,843
1,843
20171,852
1,852
20181,862
20191,871
Thereafter22,862
28,578
Total$32,032
$37,840
Commitments and Contingencies
As of December 31, 20122014, and 2013, we participate in fourthree real estate ventures structured as DownREIT partnerships that have properties in Arkansas, California, North Carolina Texas and Utah.Texas. As a general partner, we have operating and financial control over these ventures and consolidate them in our consolidated financial statements. These ventures allow the outside limited partners to put their interest in the partnership to us in exchange for our common shares or an equivalent amount in cash. We may acquire any limited partnership interests that are put to the partnership, and we have the option to redeem the interest in cash or a fixed number of our common shares, at our discretion. We also participate in a real estate venture that has a property in Texas that allows its outside partner to put operating partnership units to us. We have the option to redeem these units in cash or a fixed number of our common shares, at our discretion. No common shares were issued in exchange for any of these interests induring the year ended 2012December 31, 2014 and 20112013. The aggregate redemption value of these interests was approximately $4252 million and $3541 million as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011December 31, 2013, respectively.
As of December 31, 2014, we have entered into commitments aggregating $64.3 million comprised principally of construction contracts which are generally due in 12 to 36 months.
As of December 31, 2014, we have executed an agreement to purchase the retail portion of a mixed-use project for approximately $23.8 million at delivery by the developer, which is estimated to occur in 2016. Including this payment, our expected total investment in the retail portion of the project is approximately $29.1 million.
We issue letters of intent signifying a willingness to negotiate for acquisitions, dispositions or joint ventures, as well as other types of potential transactions, during the ordinary course of our business. Such letters of intent and other arrangements are non-binding to all parties unless and until a definitive contract is entered into by the parties. Even if definitive contracts relating to the acquisition or disposition of property are entered into, these contracts generally provide the purchaser a time period to evaluate the property and conduct due diligence. The purchaser, during this time, will have the ability to terminate a contract without penalty or forfeiture of any deposit or earnest money. No assurance can be provided that any definitive contracts will be entered into with respect to any matter covered by letters of intent, or that we will consummate any transaction contemplated by a definitive contract. Additionally, due diligence periods for property transactions are frequently extended as needed. An acquisition or disposition of property becomes probable at the time the due diligence period expires and the definitive contract has not been terminated. Our risk is then generally extended only to any earnest money deposits associated with property acquisition contracts, and our obligation to sell under a property sales contract.
We are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations in the areas where we own or operate properties. We are not aware of any contamination which may have been caused by us or any of our tenants that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
As part of our risk management activities, we have applied and been accepted into state sponsored environmental programs which will limit our expenses if contaminants need to be remediated. We also have an environmental insurance policy that covers us against third party liabilities and remediation costs.
While we believe that we do not have any material exposure to environmental remediation costs, we cannot give absolute assurance that changes in the law or new discoveries of contamination will not result in additional liabilities to us.

79


Litigation
During 2011,2013, we settled a lawsuit we filed a lawsuitin 2011 against our joint venture partner in connection with a development project in Sheridan, Colorado for an alleged failure of our joint venture partner to perform on the joint venture’s past duerepay to us an intercompany note payablepayable. Pursuant to us, which has been eliminated withinthe settlement agreement, our consolidated financial statements. We are also involved in one$16.1 million note receivable was paid in exchange for cash and real property totaling $19.1 million, receipt of our partner’s interest in two consolidated joint ventures resulting in an increase of approximately $16.2 million in noncontrolling interests and distribution of our interest in two unconsolidated joint ventures with this partner. We are unable to determine the outcometotal assets of the lawsuit or its potential effects on our other joint ventures with this partner.
We have entered into commitments aggregating $58.323.2 million comprised principally of construction contracts which are generally due in 12 to 36 months..
We are also involved in various matters of litigation arising in the normal course of business. While we are unable to predict with certainty the amounts involved, our management and counsel are of the opinion that, when such litigation is resolved, any additional liability, if any, will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.


80


Note 22.      Variable Interest Entities
Consolidated VIEs:
TwoAt December 31, 2014, one of our real estate joint ventures, whose activities principally consistprimarily consisted of owning and operating 3015 neighborhood/community shopping centers located in Texas, was determined to be VIE. During 2014, we completed the dissolution of a real estate joint venture that was previously determined to be a VIE. At December 31, 2013, two of our real estate joint ventures, whose activities primarily consisted of owning and operating 28 neighborhood/community shopping centers located in Florida,Georgia, North Carolina,Tennessee and Texas, were determined to be VIEs. Based on a financing agreementagreements that isare guaranteed solely by us, for tax planning purposes at one entity and an agreement providing for guaranteed distributions until certain transactions have settled at the other entity, we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary in botheach of the foregoing instances and have consolidated these joint ventures.
A summary of our consolidated VIEs is as follows (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2012 2011
Maximum Risk of Loss (1)
$111,305
 $138,176
Assets held by VIEs257,374
 309,387
Assets held as collateral for debt246,486
 250,105
 December 31,
 2014 2013
Maximum Risk of Loss (1)
$37,178
 $40,471
Assets Held by VIEs63,984
 233,734
Assets Held as Collateral for Debt61,850
 80,137
___________________
(1)The maximum risk of loss has been determined to be limited to our debt exposure for each real estate joint venture.
Restrictions on the use of these assets are significant because they serve as collateral for the VIEs’ debt, and we would generally be required to obtain our partners’ approval in accordance with the joint venture agreements for any major transactions. Transactions with these joint ventures on our consolidated financial statements have been limited to changes in noncontrolling interests and reductions in debt from our partners’ contributions. We and our partners are subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreements which include provisions for when additional contributions may be required including operating cash shortfalls and unplanned capital expenditures. We have not provided any additional support to the VIEs as of December 31, 2012.
Unconsolidated VIEs:
At December 31, 20122014 and 2011December 31, 2013, twoone unconsolidated real estate joint ventures wereventure was determinedto be VIEs,a VIE through the issuance of a secured loans, of which $20.9 million of debt associated with a tenancy-in-common arrangement is recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet,loan, since the lenders havelender had the ability to make decisions that could have a significant impact on the success of the entities. At December 31, 2011, we had one unconsolidated real estate joint venture with an interest in an entity, which was deemed to be a VIE since the unconsolidated joint venture provided a guaranty for the entity’s debt; however, in February 2012, our unconsolidated joint venture interest associated with these entities was sold.entity. A summary of our unconsolidated VIEsVIE is as follows (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2012 20112014 2013
Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net (1)
$29,628
 $30,377
$11,464
 $11,536
Maximum Risk of Loss (2)
32,990
 75,274
10,992
 11,542
___________________
(1)The carrying amount of the investmentsinvestment represents our contributions to the real estate joint venturesventure, net of any distributions made and our portion of the equity in earnings of the joint ventures.venture.
(2)The maximum risk of loss has been determined to be limited to our debt exposure for eachthe real estate joint venture.
We and our partners are subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreements that specify conditions, including operating shortfalls and unplanned capital expenditures, under which additional contributions may be required.


8180


Note 23.      Business Combinations
Except as identified below, our aggregate acquisitions for 2014 and 2013 were not materially significant for disclosure purposes.
Effective April 13, 2011,December 23, 2013, we acquired a partner’s 50% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture related to a development property in Florida,California, which resulted in the consolidation of this property. Management has determined that this transaction qualified as a business combination to be accounted for under the acquisition method. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of this transaction were recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at its estimated fair value as of the effective date. Fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and equity interests waswere estimated using market-based measurements, including cash flow and other valuation techniques. The fair value measurement is based on both significant inputs for similar assets and liabilities in comparable markets and significant inputs that are not observable in the markets in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Key assumptions include third-party broker valuation estimates; a discount rate of 8%7.75%; a terminal capitalization rate for similar properties; and factors that we believe market participants would consider in estimating fair value. The result of this transaction is included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income beginning April 13, 2011.December 23, 2013.
The following table summarizes the transaction related to the business combination, including the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as indicated (in thousands):
April 13, 2011 December 23, 2013 
Fair value of our equity interest before business combination$7,578
 $90,935
 
Fair value of consideration transferred$11,462
(1) 
$3,342
(1) 
Amounts recognized for assets and liabilities assumed:    
Assets:    
Property$32,807
 $64,211
 
Unamortized debt and lease costs2,421
 9,213
 
Accrued rent and accounts receivable211
 2,868
 
Cash and cash equivalents1,402
 754
 
Other, net694
 15,840
 
Liabilities:    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(137) (166) 
Other, net(318) (1,452) 
Total net assets$37,080
 $91,268
(2) 
  
Gain recognized on equity interest remeasured to fair value$20,234
(3) 
___________________
(1)
Consideration included $.5$2.8 million of cash and $11.0 million in debt reimbursement.
As a result of this business combination, we recognized a gain of $4.6 million which was attributable to the realization upon consolidation of our preferred return on equity. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the gain on this business combination is included in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as the property was sold during December 2011.

82


During 2012, we have acquired four shopping centers located in California, Georgia, Maryland and Texas, as well as, we consolidated a partner's 79.6% interest in an unconsolidated tenancy-in-common arrangement related to a property in Louisiana. The following table summarizes the transactions related to these acquisitions, including the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as indicated (in thousands):
 December 31, 2012 
Fair value of our equity interest before acquisition$3,825
 
Fair value of consideration transferred$218,481
(1) 
Amounts recognized for assets and liabilities assumed:  
Assets:  
Property$195,377
 
Unamortized debt and lease costs36,787
 
Restricted deposits and mortgage escrows395
 
Other, net3,742
 
Liabilities:  
Debt, net(46,923)
(2) 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(2,250) 
Other, net(5,899) 
Total net assets$181,229
 
   
Acquisition costs (included in operating expenses)$1,391
 
Gain on acquisition$1,869
 
_______________
(1)
Includes assumptiona future obligation of debt totaling $37.8 million.
$.5 million.
(2)
RepresentsExcludes the fair valueeffect of $54.8 million in intercompany debt which includes $6.3 millionthat was previously recorded.
is eliminated upon consolidation.
(3)Amount is included in Gain on Sale and Acquisition of Real Estate Joint Venture and Partnership Interests in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The following table summarizes the impact to revenues and net income attributable to common shareholders from our business combination and acquisitions as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011
Year Ended
December 31, 2013
Increase in revenues$9,370
 $2,164
$197
Increase (decrease) in net income attributable to common shareholders442
 (510)
Increase in net income attributable to common shareholders

81


The following unaudited supplemental pro forma data is presented for the year ended December 31, 2013, as if the business combination occurring in 2013 was completed on January 1, 2011. The gain related to this business combination was adjusted to the assumed acquisition date. The unaudited supplemental pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of our operations would have been assuming the transaction had been completed as set forth above, nor do they purport to represent our results of operations for future periods. The following table summarizes the supplemental pro forma impact of these transactions as if they had been consolidated or acquired on January 1, 2010, the earliest year presented,data, as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Pro Forma
2012(1)
 
Pro Forma
2011(1)
 
Pro Forma
2010(1)
Pro Forma
2013(1)
 
Pro Forma
2012(1)
Revenues$513,186
 $498,059
 $492,594
$498,331
 $468,656
Net income152,020
 17,434
 50,680
244,918
 152,016
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders108,809
 (19,160) 10,172
Net income attributable to common shareholders163,907
 108,805
Earnings per share – basic0.90
 (0.16) 0.08
1.35
 0.90
Earnings per share – diluted0.89
 (0.16) 0.08
1.34
 0.89
___________________
(1)There are no non-recurring pro forma adjustments included within or excluded from the amounts in the preceding table.


83


Note 24.      Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Fair Value Measurements:
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
    
Assets:       
Investments in grantor trusts$16,030
     $16,030
Derivative instruments:       
Interest rate contracts  $9,926
   9,926
Total$16,030
 $9,926
 $
 $25,956
Liabilities:       
Derivative instruments:       
Interest rate contracts  $768
   $768
Deferred compensation plan obligations$16,030
     16,030
Total$16,030
 $768
 $
 $16,798
  
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2014
 
 Assets:       
 Investments, mutual funds held in a grantor trust$19,864
     $19,864
 Investments, mutual funds7,446
     7,446
 Derivative instruments:       
 Interest rate contracts  $3,891
   3,891
 Total$27,310
 $3,891
 $
 $31,201
 Liabilities:       
 Derivative instruments:       
 Interest rate contracts  $109
   $109
 Deferred compensation plan obligations$19,864
     19,864
 Total$19,864
 $109
 $
 $19,973
 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2011
    
Assets:       
Investments in grantor trusts$14,693
     $14,693
Derivative instruments:       
Interest rate contracts  10,816
   10,816
Total$14,693
 $10,816
 $
 $25,509
Liabilities:       
Derivative instruments:       
Interest rate contracts  $674
   $674
Deferred compensation plan obligations$14,693
     14,693
Total$14,693
 $674
 $
 $15,367
A reconciliation of the outstanding balance of the subordinate tax increment revenue bonds using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
 
Fair Value 
Measurements 
Using
Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs
(Level 3)
Outstanding, January 1, 2011$10,700
Settlement of recalled bonds (1)
(10,700)
Outstanding, December 31, 2011$
(1)Settlement of recalled bonds represents the recall of previously issued subordinated tax increment revenue bonds that were available for sale and were replaced with held to maturity subordinated tax increment revenue bonds associated with the exchange transaction in April 2011.

8482


  
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2013
 
 Assets:       
 Investments, mutual funds held in a grantor trust$18,583
     $18,583
 Investments, mutual funds and time deposit8,408
 50,034
   58,442
 Derivative instruments:       
 Interest rate contracts  5,282
   5,282
 Total$26,991
 $55,316
 $
 $82,307
 Liabilities:       
 Derivative instruments:       
 Interest rate contracts  $476
   $476
 Deferred compensation plan obligations$18,583
     18,583
 Total$18,583
 $476
 $
 $19,059
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements:
Property and Property Held for Sale Impairments
Property is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property, including any identifiable intangible assets, site costs and capitalized interest, may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison is made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each such property into the foreseeable future on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If we conclude that an impairment may have occurred, estimated fair values are determined by management utilizing cash flow models, market capitalization rates and market discount rates, or by obtaining third-party broker valuation estimates, appraisals, bona fide purchase offers or the expected sales price of an executed sales agreement in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Market capitalization rates and market discount rates are determined by reviewing current sales of similar properties and transactions, and utilizing management’s knowledge and expertise in property marketing.
Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships Impairments
TheNo assets were measured at fair value of our investment in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is estimated by management based on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment, the life and other terms of the investment, holding periods, market conditions, cash flow models, market capitalization rates and market discount rates, or by obtaining third-party broker valuation estimates, appraisals and bona fide purchase offers in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Market capitalization rates and market discount rates are determined by reviewing current sales of similar properties and transactions, and utilizing management’s knowledge and expertise in property marketing. We recognize an impairment loss if we determine the fair value of an investment is less than its carrying amount and that loss in value is other than temporary.
Subordinate Tax Increment Revenue Bonds Impairment
Investments in tax increment revenue bonds are reviewed for impairment if changes in circumstances or forecasts indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable and if it is uncertain if the investment will be held to maturity. In such an event, a comparison is made of the projected recoverability of cash flows from the tax increment revenue bonds to the carrying amount of each investment. If we conclude that an impairment may have occurred, fair values are determined by management utilizing third-party sales revenue projections until the maturity of the bonds and discounted cash flow models.
nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2014.Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 20122013, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical 
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair Value 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical 
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair Value 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Property (2)
  $5,773
 $13,906
 $19,679
 $(2,971)  $3,300
 $8,576
 $11,876
 $(2,358)
Investment in real estate joint ventures
and partnerships (3)
  24,231
   24,231
 (6,608)
Total$
 $30,004
 $13,906
 $43,910
 $(9,579)$
 $3,300
 $8,576
 $11,876
 $(2,358)

___________________
(1)Total gains (losses) exclude impairments on disposed assets because they are no longer held by us.
(2)
In accordance with our policy of evaluating and recording impairments on the disposal of long-lived assets, property with a carrying amount of $22.414.3 million was written down to a fair value of $19.7 million less costs to sell of $.311.9 million, resulting in a loss of $3.02.4 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using bona fide purchase offeroffers for the Level 2 inputs. See the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements table below.
(3)
Our net investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships with a carrying amount of $30.8 million was written down to a fair value of $24.2 million, resulting in a loss of $6.6 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of this investment was determined using the weighted average of the bona fide purchase offers received for the Level 2 inputs.

85


Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical 
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair Value 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Property (2)
  $389
 $98,207
 $98,596
 $(36,907)
Property held for sale (3)
  43,657
 1,500
 45,157
 (13,799)
Investment in real estate joint ventures
and partnerships (4)
    6,311
 6,311
 (1,752)
Subordinate tax increment revenue bonds (5)
    26,723
 26,723
 (18,737)
Total$
 $44,046
 $132,741
 $176,787
 $(71,195)
(1)Total gains (losses) are reflected throughout 2011 and exclude impairments on disposed assets because they are no longer held by us.
(2)
In accordance with our policy of evaluating and recording impairments on the disposal of long-lived assets, property with a carrying amount of $135.5 million was written down to a fair value of $98.6 million, resulting in a loss of $36.9 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using the expected sales price of an executed agreement for the Level 2 input and using third party broker valuations, bona fide purchase offers, cash flow models and discount rates ranging from 8% to 13% for the Level 3 inputs.
(3)
Property held for sale with a carrying amount of $57.0 million was written down to a fair value of $45.2 million less costs to sell of $2.0 million, resulting in a loss of $13.8 million, which was included in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using the expected sales price of executed agreements for the Level 2 inputs and a cash flow model using a discount rate of 10% for the Level 3 input.
(4)
Our net investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships with a carrying amount of $8.1 million was written down to a fair value of $6.3 million, resulting in a loss of $1.8 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these investments was determined using the life and other terms of the investment, our partner’s financial condition, cash flow models and market capitalization rates ranging from 7% to 9% for the Level 3 inputs.
(5)
A net credit loss on the exchange of bonds of $18.7 million was recognized upon the recall and replacement of our investment in tax increment revenue bonds by the Agency in April 2011. The exchange transaction resulted in us receiving approximately $16.5 million in cash proceeds and $57.7 million in new subordinated bonds replacing the face value of our $51.3 million of senior bonds and $22.4 million of subordinate bonds, which had been previously written down to a fair value of $10.7 million. The carrying value of the $57.7 million subordinated bonds received in the exchange were written down to their fair value of $26.7 million, of which a loss of $11.7 million was previously recognized in December 2010. The net credit loss resulted as management did not expect to recover the par value of the bonds based upon changes in terms of the bonds and future sales tax revenue projections of the development project through their maturity. Management’s estimates of the fair value of these investments were determined using third-party sales revenue projections, future growth rates ranging from 1% to 4% and inflation rates ranging from 1% to 2% for the Level 3 inputs.
Fair Value Disclosures:
Unless otherwise listed below, short-term financial instruments and receivables are carried at amounts which approximate their fair values based on their highly-liquid nature, short-term maturities and/or expected interest rates for similar instruments.

83


Schedule of our fair value disclosures is as follows (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2012 2011
 Carrying Value 
Fair Value
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Carrying Value 
Fair Value
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures
and partnerships
$89,776
 $93,572
 $149,204
 $153,532
Tax increment revenue bonds26,505
 26,505
 26,505
 26,505
Debt:       
Fixed-rate debt1,992,599
 2,094,122
 2,014,834
 2,054,670
Variable-rate debt211,431
 223,759
 517,003
 531,353

86


A reconciliation of the credit loss recognized on our subordinated tax increment revenue bonds at December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 Carrying Value 
Fair Value
Using
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Fair Value
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Carrying Value 
Fair Value
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Notes receivable from real estate joint
ventures and partnerships
$
   $
 $13,330
 $13,549
Tax increment revenue bonds (1)
25,392
   25,392
 25,850
 25,850
Investments, held to maturity (2)
2,750
 $2,742
      
Debt:         
Fixed-rate debt1,651,959
   1,719,775
 2,136,265
 2,150,891
Variable-rate debt286,229
   292,972
 163,579
 172,349
___________________
 Credit Loss Recognized
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011$11,717
Additions19,305
Ending balance, December 31, 2011$31,022
Additions
Ending balance, December 31, 2012$31,022
(1)
At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the credit loss balance on our tax increment revenue bonds was $31.0 million.
(2)
Investments held to maturity are recorded at cost and have a gross unrealized loss of $8 thousand as of December 31, 2014.
The quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 20122014 and 2013 reported in the above tables, is as follows:
Description 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
 Valuation Technique Unobservable Inputs Range
    Minimum Maximum
Property $13,906
 Broker valuation estimate 
Indicative bid (1)
    
    Bona fide purchase offers 
Contract price (1)
    
    Discounted cash flows Discount rate   10.0%
      Capitalization rate 9.3% 9.5%
      Holding period (years)   1
      
Expected future inflation rate (2)
   3.0%
      
Market rent growth rate (2)
   3.0%
      
Expense growth rate (2)
   3.0%
      
Vacancy rate (2)
   5.0%
      
Renewal rate (2)
   75.0%
      
Average market rent rate (2)
   $10.52
      
Average leasing cost per
square foot (2)
   $16.50
Notes receivable from real
estate joint ventures and
partnerships
 93,572
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate   3.0%
Tax increment revenue bonds 26,505
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate   7.5%
      Expected future growth rate 1.0% 4.0%
      Expected future inflation rate 1.0% 2.0%
Fixed-rate debt 2,094,122
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate 1.1% 6.5%
Variable-rate debt 223,759
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate 1.4% 5.0%
_______________
(1)These fair values were developed by third parties, subject to our corroboration for reasonableness.
(2)Only applies to one property valuation.

 Description 
Fair Value at
December 31,
 
Unobservable
Inputs
 Range
 
  2014 2013    Minimum Maximum
  (in thousands) Valuation Technique  20142013 20142013
 Property $
 $8,576
 
Broker valuation
estimate
 Indicative bid      
 
Notes receivable
from real
estate joint
ventures and
partnerships
 
 13,549
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate    

2.7%
 
Tax increment
revenue bonds
 25,392
 25,850
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate    7.5%7.5%
         
Expected future
growth rate
 1.0%1.0% 2.0%2.0%
         
Expected future
inflation rate
 1.0%1.0% 2.0%2.0%
 Fixed-rate debt 1,719,775
 2,150,891
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate 1.3%1.3% 5.1%7.4%
 
Variable-rate
debt
 292,972
 172,349
 Discounted cash flows Discount rate 1.2%.8% 2.9%5.0%

8784


Note 25.      Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial data is as follows (in thousands):
First Second Third Fourth First Second Third Fourth 
2012        
2014        
Revenues (1)
$119,023
 $123,163
 $129,434
 $131,918
 $127,592
 $130,191
 $130,521
 $126,102
 
Net income22,638
(2) 
32,761
(2)(3)(4) 
42,047
(3)(4) 
54,975
(3)(4) 
64,781
(2)(3) 
36,984
(2)(4) 
102,199
(2)(5) 
103,615
(2)(6) 
Net income attributable to
common shareholders
12,328
(2) 
22,550
(2)(3)(4) 
31,404
(3)(4) 
42,928
(3)(4) 
60,593
(2)(3) 
32,686
(2)(4) 
97,619
(2)(5) 
86,270
(2)(6)(7) 
Earnings per common
share – basic
0.10
(2) 
0.19
(2)(3)(4) 
0.26
(3)(4) 
0.36
(3)(4) 
0.50
(2)(3) 
0.27
(2)(4) 
0.80
(2)(5) 
0.71
(2)(6)(7) 
Earnings per common
share – diluted
0.10
(2) 
0.19
(2)(3)(4) 
0.26
(3)(4) 
0.35
(3)(4) 
0.49
(2)(3) 
0.27
(2)(4) 
0.79
(2)(5) 
0.70
(2)(6)(7) 
2011        
2013        
Revenues (1)
$114,813
 $120,964
 $122,851
 $119,729
 $117,827
 $121,995
 $123,302
 $126,071
 
Net income (loss)17,188
 2,939
(2) 
(35,958)
(2) 
32,570
 
Net income (loss) attributable to
common shareholders
7,227
 (7,166)
(2) 
(42,089)
(2) 
22,173
 
Net income44,817
(2)(8) 
104,178
(2) 
62,389
(2) 
53,772
(2) 
Net income attributable to
common shareholders
33,668
(2)(8) 
45,421
(2)(9) 
57,832
(2) 
47,224
(2) 
Earnings per common
share – basic
0.06
 (0.06)
(2) 
(0.35)
(2) 
0.18
 0.28
(2)(8) 
0.37
(2)(9) 
0.48
(2) 
0.39
(2) 
Earnings per common
share – diluted
0.06
 (0.06)
(2) 
(0.35)
(2) 
0.18
 0.28
(2)(8) 
0.37
(2)(9) 
0.47
(2) 
0.38
(2) 
___________________
(1)Revenues from the sale of operating properties classified as discontinued operations have been reclassified and reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
(2)
The quarter results include significant impairment charges. Impairment amounts are: $10.0 million and $24.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively, and $21.3 million and $52.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011, respectively.
(3)
The quarter results include significant gains on the sale of properties and real estate joint venture and partnership interests and on acquisitions. Gain amounts are: $31.341.4 million, $17.06.8 million, $69.5 million and $27.774.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 20122014, September 30, 20122014 and December 31, 20122014, respectively, and $11.7 million, $78.4 million, $38.4 million and $25.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, June 30, 2013, September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
(3)
The quarter results include accelerated depreciation of $3.6 million related to a redevelopment project and a $1.5 million recovery of a receivable.
(4)During
The quarter results include the secondrealization of a $2.1 million tax benefit associated with the sale of unimproved land in our taxable REIT subsidiary.
(5)
The quarter results include gains on the sale of 2012, we disposedproperties in our equity method investments of $2.9 million and a $1.2 million write-off of debt costs associated with the redemption of our wholly-owned Industrial portfolio.8.1% senior unsecured notes.
(6)The quarter results include gains on the sale of properties in our equity method investments of $1.9 million and a $1.0 million impairment loss associated primarily with the disposition of a land parcel and a shopping center.
(7)The quarter results include net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $14.6 million associated with applicable gains discussed in (2) above.
(8)The quarter results include a write-off of an above-market assumed mortgage intangible due to the early payoff of the related mortgage of $9.7 million.
(9)The quarter results include net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $37.7 million associated with applicable gains discussed in (2) above and a $15.7 million deduction associated with the redemption of Series F preferred shares (see Note 9 for additional information).
Note 26. Subsequent Events
Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we acquired one center in Texas with a gross purchase price of $43.1 million and sold two centers with gross proceeds totaling $25.1 million. No impairment was realized associated with our property dispositions, and we have not completed the accounting for this recent acquisition, but anticipate that the purchase price will primarily be allocated to building, land and other identifiable intangible assets and liabilities.
Also, we are in negotiations associated with a $200 million unsecured five-year term note and a ten-year extension of an existing $66 million secured note, which are anticipated to close by the first quarter of 2015. The proceeds of the term note will be used for general corporate purposes, and the interest rate associated with the existing secured note is anticipated to be reduced by 3.9% to 3.5% with approximately $6.1 million of debt extinguishment costs being realized.
* * * * *

8885


ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 20122014. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 20122014.
There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20122014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Weingarten Realty Investors and its subsidiaries (“WRI”) maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act, which is a process designed under the supervision of WRI’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by WRI’s Board of Trust Managers, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
WRI’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of WRI’s assets;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of WRI are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trust managers of WRI; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of WRI’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
WRI’s management has responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for WRI. Management, with the participation of WRI’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of WRI’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122014 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on their evaluation of WRI’s internal control over financial reporting, WRI’s management along with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that WRI’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 20122014.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, WRI’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of WRI’s internal control over financial reporting.
February 25, 2013
19, 2015

8986


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trust Managers and Shareholders of
Weingarten Realty Investors
Houston, Texas
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Weingarten Realty Investors and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20122014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of trust managers, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trust managers of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 20122014, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 201319, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.schedules and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of ASU 2014-08.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2013

19, 2015

9087


ITEM 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III

ITEM 10. Trust Managers, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information with respect to our trust managers and executive officers is incorporated herein by reference to the “Proposal One - Election“Election of Trust Managers - Nominees,” “Executive Officers”Proposal One," “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Overview” and “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Management” sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 201328, 2015.
Code of Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of business and ethics for trust managers, officers and employees, known as the Code of Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.weingarten.com. Shareholders may request a free copy of the Code of Conduct and Ethics from:
Weingarten Realty Investors
Attention: Investor Relations
2600 Citadel Plaza Drive, Suite 125
Houston, Texas 77008
(713) 866-6000
www.weingarten.com
We have also adopted a Code of Conduct for Officers and Senior Financial Associates setting forth a code of ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, chief accounting officer and financial associates, which is available on our website at www.weingarten.com. Shareholders may request a free copy of the Code of Conduct for Officers and Senior Financial Associates from the address and phone number set forth above.
Governance Guidelines
We have adopted Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at www.weingarten.com. Shareholders may request a free copy of the Governance Guidelines from the address and phone number set forth above under “Code of Conduct and Ethics.”
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
Information with respect to executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the “Executive“Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Trust Manager Compensation,” “Proposal One - Election of Trust Managers,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Summary Compensation Table” and “Trust Manager Compensation Table” sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 201328, 2015.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
The “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” section of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 201328, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which our common shares of beneficial interest may be issued as of December 31, 20122014:
Plan category 
Number of 
shares to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted 
average
exercise price of outstanding  options,
warrants and 
rights
 
Number of 
shares
remaining 
available
for future 
issuance
 
Number of 
shares to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted 
average
exercise price of outstanding  options,
warrants and 
rights
 
Number of 
shares
remaining 
available
for future 
issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders 4,085,702 $28.98 1,885,315 2,897,123 $28.76 1,437,633
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders      
Total 4,085,702 $28.98 1,885,315 2,897,123 $28.76 1,437,633

9188


ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trust Manager Independence
The “Governance, of Our Company,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Transactions” sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 201328, 2015 are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The “Independent Registered Public Accounting“Accounting Firm Fees” section within “Proposal Two – Ratification“Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”Firm - Proposal Two” of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 201328, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference.

92


PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Report:Page  
     
 (A)
 (B)Financial Statements: 
  (i)
  (ii)
  (iii)
(iv)
  (iv)(v)
  (v)(vi)
 (C)Financial Statement Schedules: 
  II
  III
  IV
All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

89


(b)
 
Exhibits:
3.1Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3Second Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4Third Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5Fourth Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust dated April 28, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6Fifth Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust dated April 20, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.7Amended and Restated Bylaws of WRI (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated February 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.8Sixth Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust dated May 6, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.9Amendment of Bylaws-Direct Registration System, Section 7.2(a) dated May 3, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.8 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.10Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Weingarten Realty Investors (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Form 8-K on February 26, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1Form of Indenture between Weingarten Realty Investors and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, formerly and Texas Commerce Bank National Association) (filed as Exhibit 4(a) to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-57659) dated February 10, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference).

93


4.2Form of Indenture between Weingarten Realty Investors and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, formerly and Texas Commerce Bank National Association) (filed as Exhibit 4(b) to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-57659) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3Form of Fixed Rate Senior Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.19 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4Form of Floating Rate Senior Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5Form of Fixed Rate Subordinated Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.21 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6Form of Floating Rate Subordinated Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.22 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7Statement of Designation of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated April 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.8Statement of Designation of 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated July 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.9Statement of Designation of 6.50% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 29, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.106.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated April 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.116.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated July 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.124.86.50% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 29, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13Form of Receipt for Depositary Shares, each representing 1/30 of a share of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, par value $.03 per share (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated April 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.14Form of Receipt for Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, par value $.03 per share (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated July 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.154.9Form of Receipt for Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of 6.50% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, par value $.03 per share (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to WRI’s Form 8-A dated January 29, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.16Form of 7% Notes due 2011 (filed as Exhibit 4.17 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.17Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Form 8-K on August 2, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.18Form of 8.10% Note due 2019 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to WRI’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.194.10Second Supplemental Indenture, dated October 9, 2012, between Weingarten Realty Investors and The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association (successor to J.P. Morgan Chase Company, National Association) (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to WRI'sWRI’s Form 8-K on October 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.204.11Form of 3.375% Senior Note due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to WRI'sWRI’s Form 8-K on October 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.12Form of 3.50% Senior Note due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to WRI’s Form 8-K on March 22, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13Form of 4.450% Senior Note due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to WRI’s Form 8-K on October 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

90


10.1†2001 Long Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2†Restatement of the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated August 4, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3†Restatement of the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated August 4, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.36 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4†Restatement of the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated August 4, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

94


10.5†Amendment No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated December 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6†Amendment No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated December 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7†Amendment No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated December 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.40 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8†Amendment No. 2 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated November 9, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.43 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9†Amendment No. 2 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated November 9, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10†Amendment No. 2 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated November 9, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11†Amendment No. 3 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated November 17, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on December 4, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12†Amendment No. 3 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated November 17, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on December 4, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13†Amendment No. 3 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated November 17, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on December 4, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14†Amendment No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors 2001 Long Term Incentive Plan dated November 17, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on December 4, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15†Severance and Change to Control Agreement for Johnny Hendrix dated November 11, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.54 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16†Severance and Change to Control Agreement for Stephen C. Richter dated November 11, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.55 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17†Amendment No. 1 to Severance and Change to Control Agreement for Johnny Hendrix dated December 20, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.56 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18†Amendment No. 1 to Severance and Change to Control Agreement for Stephen Richter dated December 31, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.57 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19Promissory Note with Reliance Trust Company, Trustee of the Trust under the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated March 12, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.57 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20†First Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan, amended and restated, dated December 2, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.51 onto WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

91


10.21†First Amendment to the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust Agreement dated March 12, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.53 onto WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.22†Second Amendment to the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust Agreement dated August 4, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.54 onto WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.23†Non-Qualified Plan Trust Agreement for Recordkept Plans dated September 1, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.55 onto WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.24†Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to WRI’s Form 8-K dated April 26, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

95


10.25†10.25��Amendment No. 4 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated February 26, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.57 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.26†Amendment No. 4 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated May 6, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.58 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.27First Amendment to Promissory Note with Reliance Trust Company, Trustee of the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust under Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated March 11, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.59 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.28†2002 WRI Employee Share Purchase Plan dated May 6, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.60 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.29†Amended and Restated 2002 WRI Employee Share Purchase Plan dated May 10, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.61 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.30Fixed Rate Promissory Note with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association dated May 11, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.62 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.31†Weingarten Realty Investors Executive Medical Reimbursement Plan and Summary Plan Description (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K dated December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.32Second Amendment to Promissory Note with Reliance Trust Company, Trustee of the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust under the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated March 11, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.58 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.33†Second Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan dated March 14, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.59 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.34†Third Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan dated May 4, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.60 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.35†Third Amendment to the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust Agreement dated April 26, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.36Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated September 30, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on October 4, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.37Credit Agreement dated August 29, 2011 among Weingarten Realty Investors, the Lenders Party Hereto and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.38Credit Agreement Note dated August 29, 2011 with The Bank of Nova Scotia (filed as Exhibit 10.2 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.39Credit Agreement Note dated August 29, 2011 with Compass Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.3 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.40Credit Agreement Note dated August 29, 2011 with PNC Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.4 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.41Credit Agreement Note dated August 29, 2011 with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.5 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

92


10.42Credit Agreement Note dated August 29, 2011 U.S. Bank National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.6 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.43Guaranty associated with Credit Agreement among Weingarten Realty Investors, the Lenders Party Hereto and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, dated August 29, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 onto WRI’s Form 8-K on August 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.44Amendment Agreement dated September 30, 2011 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated September 30, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.70 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

96


10.45Amendment Agreement dated November 14, 2011 to the Credit Agreement dated August 29, 2011 among Weingarten Realty Investors, the Lenders Party Hereto and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.71 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.46Guaranty dated November 14, 2011 associated with Credit Agreement among Weingarten Realty Investors, the Lenders Party Hereto and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, dated August 29, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.72 to WRI’s Annual Report on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.47Third Amendment to Promissory Note with Reliance Trust Company, Trustee of the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust under the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated February 15, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.48†Fourth Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan dated March 2, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 onto WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.49Purchase and Sale Agreement dated April 10, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI's Form 8-K on April 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.50†Amendment No. 4 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated August 10, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 onto WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.51†Amendment No. 5 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated August 10, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 onto WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.52Assignment and Assumption dated September 6, 2012 of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated September 30, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 onto WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.53†*Master Nonqualified Plan Trust Agreement dated August 23, 2006.2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.53 to WRI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.54†*Restatement of the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan dated November 17, 2008.2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.54 to WRI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.55Amendment Agreement dated April 18, 2013 of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated September 30, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.56Fourth Amendment to Promissory Note with Reliance Trust Company, Trustee of the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust under the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated March 11, 2013(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.57†Restatement of the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Plan dated December 23, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.57 to WRI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.58Fifth Amendment to Promissory Note with Reliance Trust Company, Trustee of the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust under the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated March 11, 2014(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to WRI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.59†*First Amendment to Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Plan dated December 16, 2014.
12.1*Computation of Ratios.
21.1*Listing of Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

93


23.1*Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
31.1*Certification pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).
31.2*Certification pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).
32.1**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).
32.2**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
  
*Filed with this report.
**Furnished with this report.
Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

9794


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
   
 By:/s/  Andrew M. Alexander
  Andrew M. Alexander
  Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 25, 2013
19, 2015
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of Weingarten Realty Investors, a real estate investment trust organized under the Texas Business Organizations Code, and the undersigned trust managers and officers of Weingarten Realty Investors hereby constitute and appoint Andrew M. Alexander, Stanford Alexander, Stephen C. Richter and Joe D. Shafer or any one of them, its or his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for it or him and in its or his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, with full power to act alone, to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file each such amendment to the report, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as it or he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

9895


Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 SignatureTitleDate
    
By:/s/ Stanford Alexander
Chairman
and Trust Manager
February 25, 2013
Stanford Alexander
By:/s/ Andrew M. Alexander
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Trust Manager
February 25, 201319, 2015
 Andrew M. Alexander
By:/s/ Stanford Alexander
Chairman
and Trust Manager
February 19, 2015
Stanford Alexander
    
By:/s/ Shelaghmichael BrownTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Shelaghmichael Brown
    
By:/s/ James W. CrownoverTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 James W. Crownover
    
By:/s/ Robert J. CruikshankTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Robert J. Cruikshank
    
By:/s/ Melvin DowTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Melvin Dow
    
By:/s/ Stephen A. LasherTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Stephen A. Lasher
    
By:/s/ Stephen C. Richter
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
February 25, 201319, 2015
 Stephen C. Richter
    
By:/s/ Thomas L. RyanTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Thomas L. Ryan
    
By:/s/ Douglas W. SchnitzerTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Douglas W. Schnitzer
    
By:/s/ Joe D. Shafer
Senior Vice President/Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 25, 201319, 2015
 Joe D. Shafer
    
By:/s/ C. Park ShaperTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 C. Park Shaper
    
By:/s/ Marc J. ShapiroTrust ManagerFebruary 25, 201319, 2015
 Marc J. Shapiro

9996


Schedule II
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 20122014, 20112013, and 20102012
(Amounts in thousands)
Description 
Balance at
beginning
of period
 
Charged
to costs
and
expenses
 
Deductions
(1)
 
Balance
at end of
period
 
Balance at
beginning
of period
 
Charged
to costs
and
expenses
 
Deductions(1)
 
Balance
at end of
period
2014        
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $9,386
 $1,914
 $3,620
 $7,680
Tax Valuation Allowance 30,541
 2,239
 5,241
 27,539
2013        
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $12,127
 $1,420
 $4,161
 $9,386
Tax Valuation Allowance 28,376
 2,243
 78
 30,541
2012                
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $11,301
 $7,157
 $6,331
 $12,127
 $11,301
 $7,157
 $6,331
 $12,127
Tax Valuation Allowance 24,595
 3,781
 
 28,376
 24,595
 3,781
 
 28,376
2011        
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $10,137
 $7,563
 $6,399
 $11,301
Tax Valuation Allowance 15,818
 10,823
 2,046
 24,595
2010        
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $10,380
 $6,105
 $6,348
 $10,137
Tax Valuation Allowance 9,605
 8,570
 2,357
 15,818
___________________
(1)Write-offs of amounts previously reserved.

10097


Schedule III

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 20122014
(Amounts in thousands)
 Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period       
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Shopping Center:                   
Centers:                   
10-Federal Shopping Center $1,791
 $7,470
 $706
 $1,791
 $8,176
 $9,967
 $(6,641) $3,326
 $(7,953) 03/20/2008 $1,791
 $7,470
 $1,090
 $1,791
 $8,560
 $10,351
 $(7,155) $3,196
 $(7,233) 03/20/2008
1919 North Loop West 1,334
 8,451
 11,592
 1,337
 20,040
 21,377
 (8,925) 12,452
 
 12/05/2006
580 Market Place 3,892
 15,570
 2,482
 3,889
 18,055
 21,944
 (5,234) 16,710
 (16,497) 04/02/2001 3,892
 15,570
 3,534
 3,889
 19,107
 22,996
 (6,463) 16,533
 (16,048) 04/02/2001
8000 Sunset Strip Shopping Center 18,320
 73,431
 283
 18,320
 73,714
 92,034
 (1,112) 90,922
 
 06/27/2012 18,320
 73,431
 2,334
 18,320
 75,765
 94,085
 (5,469) 88,616
 
 06/27/2012
Alabama Shepherd Shopping Center 637
 2,026
 7,738
 1,062
 9,339
 10,401
 (3,650) 6,751
 
 04/30/2004 637
 2,026
 7,882
 1,062
 9,483
 10,545
 (4,390) 6,155
 
 04/30/2004
Angelina Village 200
 1,777
 10,163
 1,127
 11,013
 12,140
 (6,372) 5,768
 
 04/30/1991
Arcade Square 1,497
 5,986
 1,399
 1,495
 7,387
 8,882
 (2,452) 6,430
 
 04/02/2001
Argyle Village Shopping Center 4,524
 18,103
 2,569
 4,526
 20,670
 25,196
 (6,338) 18,858
 
 11/30/2001 4,524
 18,103
 3,807
 4,526
 21,908
 26,434
 (7,922) 18,512
 
 11/30/2001
Arrowhead Festival Shopping Center 1,294
 154
 3,522
 2,024
 2,946
 4,970
 (1,207) 3,763
 
 12/31/2000 1,294
 154
 3,917
 1,903
 3,462
 5,365
 (1,445) 3,920
 
 12/31/2000
Avent Ferry Shopping Center 1,952
 7,814
 1,166
 1,952
 8,980
 10,932
 (3,049) 7,883
 (253) 04/04/2002 1,952
 7,814
 1,191
 1,952
 9,005
 10,957
 (3,576) 7,381
 
 04/04/2002
Ballwin Plaza 2,988
 12,039
 446
 2,517
 12,956
 15,473
 (5,408) 10,065
 
 10/01/1999
Bartlett Towne Center 3,479
 14,210
 965
 3,443
 15,211
 18,654
 (5,187) 13,467
 (3,196) 05/15/2001 3,479
 14,210
 1,208
 3,443
 15,454
 18,897
 (6,095) 12,802
 (784) 05/15/2001
Bell Plaza 1,322
 7,151
 513
 1,322
 7,664
 8,986
 (3,366) 5,620
 (7,319) 03/20/2008 1,322
 7,151
 637
 1,322
 7,788
 9,110
 (3,852) 5,258
 (6,656) 03/20/2008
Bellaire Blvd Shopping Center 124
 37
 
 124
 37
 161
 (37) 124
 (1,984) 11/13/2008
Bellaire Blvd. Shopping Center 124
 37
 3
 125
 39
 164
 (37) 127
 
 11/13/2008
Best in the West 13,191
 77,159
 3,869
 13,194
 81,025
 94,219
 (16,671) 77,548
 (33,436) 04/28/2005 13,191
 77,159
 7,249
 13,194
 84,405
 97,599
 (21,502) 76,097
 
 04/28/2005
Blalock Market at I-10 
 4,730
 2,033
 
 6,763
 6,763
 (4,491) 2,272
 
 12/31/1990
Boca Lyons Plaza 3,676
 14,706
 2,088
 3,651
 16,819
 20,470
 (4,482) 15,988
 
 08/17/2001 3,676
 14,706
 2,855
 3,651
 17,586
 21,237
 (5,645) 15,592
 
 08/17/2001
Boswell Towne Center 1,488
 
 1,768
 615
 2,641
 3,256
 (1,406) 1,850
 
 12/31/2003 1,488
 
 1,723
 615
 2,596
 3,211
 (1,395) 1,816
 
 12/31/2003
Braeswood Square Shopping Center 
 1,421
 1,191
 
 2,612
 2,612
 (2,284) 328
 
 05/28/1969 
 1,421
 1,197
 
 2,618
 2,618
 (2,397) 221
 
 05/28/1969
Broadway Marketplace 898
 3,637
 963
 906
 4,592
 5,498
 (2,424) 3,074
 
 12/16/1993 898
 3,637
 1,010
 906
 4,639
 5,545
 (2,713) 2,832
 
 12/16/1993
Broadway Shopping Center 234
 3,166
 583
 235
 3,748
 3,983
 (2,511) 1,472
 (2,870) 03/20/2008 234
 3,166
 799
 235
 3,964
 4,199
 (2,621) 1,578
 (2,610) 03/20/2008
Brookwood Marketplace 7,050
 15,134
 7,135
 7,511
 21,808
 29,319
 (3,461) 25,858
 (18,611) 08/22/2006 7,050
 15,134
 7,239
 7,511
 21,912
 29,423
 (4,686) 24,737
 (17,924) 08/22/2006
Brookwood Square Shopping Center 4,008
 19,753
 1,166
 4,008
 20,919
 24,927
 (5,031) 19,896
 
 12/16/2003 4,008
 19,753
 (3,131) 4,008
 16,622
 20,630
 (3,610) 17,020
 
 12/16/2003
Brownsville Commons 1,333
 5,536
 39
 1,333
 5,575
 6,908
 (950) 5,958
 
 05/22/2006 1,333
 5,536
 315
 1,333
 5,851
 7,184
 (1,298) 5,886
 
 05/22/2006
Buena Vista Marketplace 1,958
 7,832
 998
 1,956
 8,832
 10,788
 (2,762) 8,026
 
 04/02/2001 1,958
 7,832
 1,189
 1,956
 9,023
 10,979
 (3,277) 7,702
 
 04/02/2001
Bull City Market 930
 6,651
 298
 930
 6,949
 7,879
 (1,294) 6,585
 (3,672) 06/10/2005 930
 6,651
 654
 930
 7,305
 8,235
 (1,715) 6,520
 (3,572) 06/10/2005
Camelback Village Square 
 8,720
 1,008
 
 9,728
 9,728
 (4,424) 5,304
 
 09/30/1994 
 8,720
 1,267
 
 9,987
 9,987
 (5,010) 4,977
 
 09/30/1994
Camp Creek Marketplace II 6,169
 32,036
 1,276
 4,697
 34,784
 39,481
 (5,754) 33,727
 (20,964) 08/22/2006 6,169
 32,036
 1,460
 4,697
 34,968
 39,665
 (7,587) 32,078
 (19,833) 08/22/2006
Capital Square 1,852
 7,406
 1,410
 1,852
 8,816
 10,668
 (2,848) 7,820
 
 04/04/2002 1,852
 7,406
 1,410
 1,852
 8,816
 10,668
 (3,551) 7,117
 
 04/04/2002
Centerwood Plaza 915
 3,659
 2,139
 914
 5,799
 6,713
 (1,605) 5,108
 
 04/02/2001 915
 3,659
 2,379
 914
 6,039
 6,953
 (2,049) 4,904
 
 04/02/2001
Charleston Commons Shopping Center 23,230
 36,877
 2,186
 23,210
 39,083
 62,293
 (8,366) 53,927
 
 12/20/2006
Cherry Creek Retail Center 5,416
 14,624
 
 5,416
 14,624
 20,040
 (2,309) 17,731
 
 06/16/2011

98


Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Chino Hills Marketplace $7,218
 $28,872
 $11,424
 $7,234
 $40,280
 $47,514
 $(16,385) $31,129
 $
 08/20/2002
Citadel Building 3,236
 6,168
 7,980
 534
 16,850
 17,384
 (14,180) 3,204
 
 12/30/1975
College Park Shopping Center 2,201
 8,845
 7,137
 2,641
 15,542
 18,183
 (9,670) 8,513
 (11,004) 11/16/1998
Colonial Plaza 10,806
 43,234
 13,365
 10,813
 56,592
 67,405
 (22,277) 45,128
 
 02/21/2001
Countryside Centre 15,523
 29,818
 8,868
 15,559
 38,650
 54,209
 (7,992) 46,217
 
 07/06/2007
Creekside Center 1,732
 6,929
 1,991
 1,730
 8,922
 10,652
 (3,569) 7,083
 (7,728) 04/02/2001
Cullen Plaza Shopping Center 106
 2,841
 452
 106
 3,293
 3,399
 (2,639) 760
 (5,987) 03/20/2008
Cypress Pointe 3,468
 8,700
 1,381
 3,793
 9,756
 13,549
 (5,809) 7,740
 
 04/04/2002
Dallas Commons Shopping Center 1,582
 4,969
 94
 1,582
 5,063
 6,645
 (1,092) 5,553
 
 09/14/2006
Danville Plaza Shopping Center 
 3,360
 2,322
 
 5,682
 5,682
 (5,006) 676
 
 09/30/1960
DDS Office Building 959
 3,141
 
 959
 3,141
 4,100
 (181) 3,919
 
 10/07/2013
Desert Village Shopping Center 3,362
 14,969
 1,167
 3,362
 16,136
 19,498
 (1,839) 17,659
 
 10/28/2010
Discovery Plaza 2,193
 8,772
 1,091
 2,191
 9,865
 12,056
 (3,444) 8,612
 
 04/02/2001
Eastdale Shopping Center 1,423
 5,809
 1,958
 1,417
 7,773
 9,190
 (3,985) 5,205
 
 12/31/1997
Eastern Horizon 10,282
 16
 (279) 1,569
 8,450
 10,019
 (4,669) 5,350
 
 12/31/2002
Edgewater Marketplace 4,821
 11,225
 395
 4,821
 11,620
 16,441
 (1,403) 15,038
 (17,600) 11/19/2010
El Camino Promenade 4,431
 20,557
 4,217
 4,429
 24,776
 29,205
 (7,648) 21,557
 
 05/21/2004
Embassy Lakes Shopping Center 2,803
 11,268
 845
 2,803
 12,113
 14,916
 (3,755) 11,161
 
 12/18/2002
Entrada de Oro Plaza Shopping Center 6,041
 10,511
 1,693
 6,115
 12,130
 18,245
 (3,170) 15,075
 
 01/22/2007
Epic Village St. Augustine 283
 1,171
 4,065
 320
 5,199
 5,519
 (2,260) 3,259
 
 09/30/2009
Falls Pointe Shopping Center 3,535
 14,289
 407
 3,522
 14,709
 18,231
 (4,628) 13,603
 
 12/17/2002
Festival on Jefferson Court 5,041
 13,983
 2,791
 5,022
 16,793
 21,815
 (5,191) 16,624
 
 12/22/2004
Fiesta Market Place 137
 429
 8
 137
 437
 574
 (431) 143
 (1,524) 03/20/2008
Fiesta Trails 8,825
 32,790
 2,909
 8,825
 35,699
 44,524
 (11,598) 32,926
 
 09/30/2003
Flamingo Pines Plaza 10,403
 35,014
 (14,214) 5,335
 25,868
 31,203
 (6,099) 25,104
 
 01/28/2005
Fountain Plaza 1,319
 5,276
 1,424
 1,095
 6,924
 8,019
 (3,651) 4,368
 
 03/10/1994
Francisco Center 1,999
 7,997
 4,525
 2,403
 12,118
 14,521
 (7,957) 6,564
 (9,996) 11/16/1998
Freedom Centre 2,929
 15,302
 5,568
 6,944
 16,855
 23,799
 (4,632) 19,167
 (717) 06/23/2006
Galleria Shopping Center 10,795
 10,339
 8,487
 10,805
 18,816
 29,621
 (3,925) 25,696
 (18,200) 12/11/2006
Galveston Place 2,713
 5,522
 5,994
 3,279
 10,950
 14,229
 (8,418) 5,811
 
 11/30/1983
Gateway Plaza 4,812
 19,249
 4,056
 4,808
 23,309
 28,117
 (8,099) 20,018
 (21,787) 04/02/2001
Gateway Station 1,622
 3
 9,401
 1,921
 9,105
 11,026
 (3,082) 7,944
 
 09/30/2009
Glenbrook Square Shopping Center 632
 3,576
 709
 632
 4,285
 4,917
 (2,221) 2,696
 (5,056) 03/20/2008
Grayson Commons 3,180
 9,023
 217
 3,163
 9,257
 12,420
 (2,426) 9,994
 (5,565) 11/09/2004
Greenhouse Marketplace 4,607
 22,771
 3,435
 4,750
 26,063
 30,813
 (7,656) 23,157
 
 01/28/2004

99


Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Griggs Road Shopping Center $257
 $2,303
 $(252) $257
 $2,051
 $2,308
 $(1,881) $427
 $(3,884) 03/20/2008
Hallmark Town Center 1,368
 5,472
 1,101
 1,367
 6,574
 7,941
 (2,607) 5,334
 
 04/02/2001
Harrisburg Plaza 1,278
 3,924
 933
 1,278
 4,857
 6,135
 (4,055) 2,080
 (10,418) 03/20/2008
HEB - Dairy Ashford & Memorial 1,717
 4,234
 
 1,717
 4,234
 5,951
 (533) 5,418
 
 03/06/2012
Heights Plaza Shopping Center 58
 699
 2,494
 928
 2,323
 3,251
 (1,394) 1,857
 
 06/30/1995
High House Crossing 2,576
 10,305
 467
 2,576
 10,772
 13,348
 (3,680) 9,668
 
 04/04/2002
Highland Square 
 
 1,887
 
 1,887
 1,887
 (472) 1,415
 
 10/06/1959
Hope Valley Commons 2,439
 8,487
 349
 2,439
 8,836
 11,275
 (1,070) 10,205
 
 08/31/2010
Humblewood Shopping Center 2,215
 4,724
 3,174
 1,166
 8,947
 10,113
 (8,207) 1,906
 (12,705) 03/09/1977
I45/Telephone Rd. 678
 11,182
 596
 678
 11,778
 12,456
 (5,769) 6,687
 (12,758) 03/20/2008
Independence Plaza I 12,795
 23,063
 191
 12,795
 23,254
 36,049
 (1,651) 34,398
 (18,112) 06/11/2013
Independence Plaza II 6,555
 8,564
 1,275
 6,555
 9,839
 16,394
 (638) 15,756
 
 06/11/2013
Jess Ranch Marketplace 8,750
 25,560
 296
 8,750
 25,856
 34,606
 (1,174) 33,432
 
 12/23/2013
Jess Ranch Marketplace Phase III 8,431
 21,470
 91
 8,431
 21,561
 29,992
 (991) 29,001
 
 12/23/2013
Lake Pointe Market 1,404
 
 4,454
 1,960
 3,898
 5,858
 (2,167) 3,691
 
 12/31/2004
Lakeside Marketplace 6,064
 22,989
 3,348
 6,150
 26,251
 32,401
 (6,700) 25,701
 (16,394) 08/22/2006
Largo Mall 10,817
 40,906
 3,847
 10,810
 44,760
 55,570
 (12,926) 42,644
 
 03/01/2004
Laveen Village Marketplace 1,190
 
 5,204
 1,006
 5,388
 6,394
 (3,011) 3,383
 
 08/15/2003
Lawndale Shopping Center 82
 927
 727
 82
 1,654
 1,736
 (1,091) 645
 (3,635) 03/20/2008
League City Plaza 1,918
 7,592
 874
 1,918
 8,466
 10,384
 (4,665) 5,719
 (10,085) 03/20/2008
Leesville Towne Centre 7,183
 17,162
 1,346
 7,223
 18,468
 25,691
 (5,238) 20,453
 
 01/30/2004
Little York Plaza Shopping Center 342
 5,170
 1,753
 342
 6,923
 7,265
 (5,677) 1,588
 (4,396) 03/20/2008
Lyons Avenue Shopping Center 249
 1,183
 54
 249
 1,237
 1,486
 (1,042) 444
 (2,644) 03/20/2008
Madera Village Shopping Center 3,788
 13,507
 1,239
 3,816
 14,718
 18,534
 (3,446) 15,088
 
 03/13/2007
Market at Town Center - Sugarland 8,600
 26,627
 23,907
 8,600
 50,534
 59,134
 (22,702) 36,432
 
 12/23/1996
Market at Westchase Shopping Center 1,199
 5,821
 2,632
 1,415
 8,237
 9,652
 (5,683) 3,969
 
 02/15/1991
Marketplace at Seminole Outparcel 1,000
 
 1,499
 1,046
 1,453
 2,499
 (28) 2,471
 
 08/21/2006
Marketplace at Seminole Towne 15,067
 53,743
 6,144
 21,665
 53,289
 74,954
 (11,767) 63,187
 (38,305) 08/21/2006
Markham West Shopping Center 2,694
 10,777
 4,080
 2,696
 14,855
 17,551
 (7,541) 10,010
 
 09/18/1998
Marshall's Plaza 1,802
 12,315
 661
 1,804
 12,974
 14,778
 (3,391) 11,387
 
 06/01/2005
Mendenhall Commons 2,655
 9,165
 653
 2,677
 9,796
 12,473
 (2,379) 10,094
 
 11/13/2008
Menifee Town Center 1,827
 7,307
 4,985
 1,824
 12,295
 14,119
 (4,302) 9,817
 
 04/02/2001
Millpond Center 3,155
 9,706
 1,564
 3,161
 11,264
 14,425
 (3,378) 11,047
 
 07/28/2005
Mohave Crossroads 3,953
 63
 35,919
 3,128
 36,807
 39,935
 (16,016) 23,919
 
 12/31/2009
Monte Vista Village Center 1,485
 58
 5,528
 755
 6,316
 7,071
 (3,960) 3,111
 
 12/31/2004

100


Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Moore Plaza $6,445
 $26,140
 $11,033
 $6,487
 $37,131
 $43,618
 $(17,502) $26,116
 $
 03/20/1998
Mueller Regional Retail Center 10,382
 56,303
 165
 10,382
 56,468
 66,850
 (3,159) 63,691
 (34,300) 10/03/2013
North Creek Plaza 6,915
 25,625
 4,200
 6,954
 29,786
 36,740
 (8,848) 27,892
 
 08/19/2004
North Towne Plaza 960
 3,928
 7,405
 879
 11,414
 12,293
 (7,708) 4,585
 (9,676) 02/15/1990
North Towne Plaza 6,646
 99
 1,526
 1,005
 7,266
 8,271
 (1,680) 6,591
 
 04/01/2010
Northbrook Shopping Center 1,629
 4,489
 3,037
 1,713
 7,442
 9,155
 (6,788) 2,367
 (9,082) 11/06/1967
Northwoods Shopping Center 1,768
 7,071
 421
 1,772
 7,488
 9,260
 (2,496) 6,764
 
 04/04/2002
Oak Forest Shopping Center 760
 2,726
 4,929
 748
 7,667
 8,415
 (5,744) 2,671
 (7,904) 12/30/1976
Oak Grove Market Center 5,758
 10,508
 940
 5,861
 11,345
 17,206
 (2,334) 14,872
 (7,358) 06/15/2007
Oracle Crossings 4,614
 18,274
 28,966
 10,582
 41,272
 51,854
 (8,440) 43,414
 
 01/22/2007
Oracle Wetmore Shopping Center 24,686
 26,878
 6,975
 13,813
 44,726
 58,539
 (9,114) 49,425
 
 01/22/2007
Overton Park Plaza 9,266
 37,789
 11,729
 9,264
 49,520
 58,784
 (14,192) 44,592
 
 10/24/2003
Palmer Plaza 765
 3,081
 2,558
 827
 5,577
 6,404
 (3,808) 2,596
 
 07/31/1980
Palmilla Center 1,258
 
 13,013
 2,882
 11,389
 14,271
 (6,534) 7,737
 
 12/31/2002
Palms of Carrollwood 3,995
 16,390
 710
 3,995
 17,100
 21,095
 (1,769) 19,326
 
 12/23/2010
Paradise Marketplace 2,153
 8,612
 (2,091) 1,197
 7,477
 8,674
 (3,921) 4,753
 
 07/20/1995
Parliament Square II 2
 10
 1,183
 3
 1,192
 1,195
 (706) 489
 
 06/24/2005
Perimeter Village 29,701
 42,337
 3,551
 34,404
 41,185
 75,589
 (8,803) 66,786
 (26,058) 07/03/2007
Phillips Crossing 
 1
 28,208
 872
 27,337
 28,209
 (9,368) 18,841
 
 09/30/2009
Phoenix Office Building 1,696
 3,255
 1,164
 1,773
 4,342
 6,115
 (1,276) 4,839
 
 01/31/2007
Pike Center 
 40,537
 2,035
 
 42,572
 42,572
 (4,320) 38,252
 
 08/14/2012
Plantation Centre 3,463
 14,821
 1,849
 3,471
 16,662
 20,133
 (4,546) 15,587
 
 08/19/2004
Promenade 23 16,028
 2,271
 39
 16,028
 2,310
 18,338
 (381) 17,957
 
 03/25/2011
Prospector's Plaza 3,746
 14,985
 5,743
 3,716
 20,758
 24,474
 (5,928) 18,546
 
 04/02/2001
Pueblo Anozira Shopping Center 2,750
 11,000
 5,123
 2,768
 16,105
 18,873
 (8,661) 10,212
 (11,028) 06/16/1994
Rainbow Plaza 6,059
 24,234
 2,742
 6,081
 26,954
 33,035
 (11,786) 21,249
 
 10/22/1997
Rainbow Plaza I 3,883
 15,540
 571
 3,896
 16,098
 19,994
 (5,782) 14,212
 
 12/28/2000
Raintree Ranch Center 11,442
 595
 17,553
 10,983
 18,607
 29,590
 (8,533) 21,057
 
 03/31/2008
Rancho Encanto 957
 3,829
 3,814
 839
 7,761
 8,600
 (4,783) 3,817
 
 04/28/1997
Rancho San Marcos Village 3,533
 14,138
 5,066
 3,887
 18,850
 22,737
 (6,000) 16,737
 
 02/26/2003
Rancho Towne & Country 1,161
 4,647
 728
 1,166
 5,370
 6,536
 (2,693) 3,843
 
 10/16/1995
Randalls Center/Kings Crossing 3,570
 8,147
 551
 3,585
 8,683
 12,268
 (5,202) 7,066
 
 11/13/2008
Red Mountain Gateway 2,166
 89
 9,457
 2,737
 8,975
 11,712
 (4,498) 7,214
 
 12/31/2003
Regency Centre 5,616
 18,516
 1,613
 3,581
 22,164
 25,745
 (5,288) 20,457
 
 07/28/2006
Reynolds Crossing 4,276
 9,186
 145
 4,276
 9,331
 13,607
 (2,018) 11,589
 
 09/14/2006

101


Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Champions Village $7,205
 $36,579
 $2,245
 $7,205
 $38,824
 $46,029
 $(15,030) $30,999
 $(33,391) 11/13/2008
Charleston Commons Shopping Center 23,230
 36,877
 1,497
 23,210
 38,394
 61,604
 (6,169) 55,435
 (29,033) 12/20/2006
Cherokee Plaza 22,219
 9,718
 44
 22,219
 9,762
 31,981
 (1,704) 30,277
 (15,071) 11/13/2008
Cherry Creek Retail Center 5,416
 14,624
 
 5,416
 14,624
 20,040
 (989) 19,051
 
 06/16/2011
Chino Hills Marketplace 7,218
 28,872
 10,347
 7,234
 39,203
 46,437
 (13,271) 33,166
 
 08/20/2002
College Park Shopping Center 2,201
 8,845
 5,854
 2,641
 14,259
 16,900
 (8,132) 8,768
 (11,004) 11/16/1998
Colonial Landing 
 16,390
 13,145
 
 29,535
 29,535
 (8,290) 21,245
 (16,210) 09/30/2008
Colonial Plaza 10,806
 43,234
 11,071
 10,813
 54,298
 65,111
 (17,632) 47,479
 
 02/21/2001
Commons at Dexter Lake I 2,923
 12,007
 1,277
 2,923
 13,284
 16,207
 (3,715) 12,492
 (9,743) 11/13/2008
Commons at Dexter Lake II 2,023
 6,940
 92
 2,023
 7,032
 9,055
 (1,314) 7,741
 (3,591) 11/13/2008
Contryside Centre - Pad 1,616
 3,432
 4,243
 1,616
 7,675
 9,291
 (622) 8,669
 
 07/06/2007
Countryside Centre 13,908
 26,387
 4,136
 13,943
 30,488
 44,431
 (3,931) 40,500
 
 07/06/2007
Creekside Center 1,732
 6,929
 1,918
 1,730
 8,849
 10,579
 (2,822) 7,757
 (7,933) 04/02/2001
Crossroads Shopping Center 
 2,083
 1,486
 
 3,569
 3,569
 (3,395) 174
 
 05/11/1972
Cullen Plaza Shopping Center 106
 2,841
 588
 106
 3,429
 3,535
 (2,652) 883
 (6,583) 03/20/2008
Cypress Pointe 3,468
 8,700
 956
 3,468
 9,656
 13,124
 (5,134) 7,990
 
 04/04/2002
Cypress Station Square 3,736
 8,374
 1,153
 2,389
 10,874
 13,263
 (8,921) 4,342
 
 12/06/1972
Dacula Market 1,353
 104
 2,299
 1,393
 2,363
 3,756
 (56) 3,700
 
 05/12/2011
Dallas Commons Shopping Center 1,582
 4,969
 55
 1,582
 5,024
 6,606
 (820) 5,786
 
 09/14/2006
Danville Plaza Shopping Center 
 3,360
 1,885
 
 5,245
 5,245
 (5,007) 238
 
 09/30/1960
Desert Village Shopping Center 3,362
 14,969
 421
 3,362
 15,390
 18,752
 (883) 17,869
 
 10/28/2010
Discovery Plaza 2,193
 8,772
 560
 2,191
 9,334
 11,525
 (2,835) 8,690
 
 04/02/2001
Eastdale Shopping Center 1,423
 5,809
 1,894
 1,417
 7,709
 9,126
 (3,489) 5,637
 
 12/31/1997
Eastern Horizon 10,282
 16
 (407) 1,569
 8,322
 9,891
 (4,422) 5,469
 
 12/31/2002
Edgebrook Shopping Center 183
 1,914
 432
 183
 2,346
 2,529
 (1,761) 768
 (6,411) 03/20/2008
Edgewater Marketplace 4,821
 11,225
 864
 4,821
 12,089
 16,910
 (644) 16,266
 (17,600) 11/19/2010
El Camino Shopping Center 4,431
 20,557
 4,085
 4,429
 24,644
 29,073
 (5,807) 23,266
 
 05/21/2004
Embassy Lakes Shopping Center 2,803
 11,268
 581
 2,803
 11,849
 14,652
 (3,030) 11,622
 
 12/18/2002
Entrada de Oro Plaza Shopping Center 6,041
 10,511
 1,563
 6,115
 12,000
 18,115
 (2,166) 15,949
 
 01/22/2007
Epic Village St. Augustine 283
 1,171
 4,065
 320
 5,199
 5,519
 (1,331) 4,188
 
 09/30/2009
Falls Pointe Shopping Center 3,535
 14,289
 373
 3,542
 14,655
 18,197
 (3,810) 14,387
 
 12/17/2002
Festival on Jefferson Court 5,041
 13,983
 2,674
 5,022
 16,676
 21,698
 (3,952) 17,746
 
 12/22/2004
Fiesta Center 
 4,730
 1,930
 
 6,660
 6,660
 (3,923) 2,737
 
 12/31/1990
Fiesta Market Place 137
 429
 8
 137
 437
 574
 (430) 144
 (1,676) 03/20/2008
Fiesta Trails 8,825
 32,790
 2,752
 8,825
 35,542
 44,367
 (9,343) 35,024
 
 09/30/2003
  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Richmond Square $1,993
 $953
 $13,571
 $14,512
 $2,005
 $16,517
 $(1,255) $15,262
 $
 12/31/1996
Ridgeway Trace 26,629
 544
 20,369
 15,573
 31,969
 47,542
 (8,065) 39,477
 
 11/09/2006
River Oaks Shopping Center 1,354
 1,946
 403
 1,363
 2,340
 3,703
 (2,013) 1,690
 
 12/04/1992
River Oaks Shopping Center 3,534
 17,741
 35,453
 4,207
 52,521
 56,728
 (22,754) 33,974
 
 12/04/1992
River Point at Sheridan 28,898
 4,042
 4,226
 9,360
 27,806
 37,166
 (4,911) 32,255
 (6,720) 04/01/2010
Roswell Corners 6,136
 21,447
 163
 5,835
 21,911
 27,746
 (6,392) 21,354
 (6,621) 06/24/2004
Roswell Crossing Shopping Center 7,625
 18,573
 394
 7,625
 18,967
 26,592
 (2,123) 24,469
 (12,153) 07/18/2012
San Marcos Plaza 1,360
 5,439
 528
 1,358
 5,969
 7,327
 (2,129) 5,198
 
 04/02/2001
Scottsdale Horizon 
 3,241
 37,616
 12,914
 27,943
 40,857
 (800) 40,057
 
 01/22/2007
Sea Ranch Centre 11,977
 4,219
 969
 11,977
 5,188
 17,165
 (433) 16,732
 
 03/06/2013
Shoppes at Bears Path 3,252
 5,503
 1,260
 3,290
 6,725
 10,015
 (1,769) 8,246
 
 03/13/2007
Shoppes at Memorial Villages 1,417
 4,786
 7,723
 3,332
 10,594
 13,926
 (6,989) 6,937
 
 01/11/2012
Shoppes of South Semoran 4,283
 9,785
 (1,570) 4,745
 7,753
 12,498
 (1,757) 10,741
 (8,842) 08/31/2007
Shops at Kirby Drive 1,201
 945
 276
 1,202
 1,220
 2,422
 (387) 2,035
 
 05/27/2008
Shops at Three Corners 6,215
 9,303
 5,490
 6,224
 14,784
 21,008
 (9,677) 11,331
 
 12/31/1989
Silver Creek Plaza 3,231
 12,924
 3,214
 3,228
 16,141
 19,369
 (6,059) 13,310
 (15,065) 04/02/2001
Six Forks Shopping Center 6,678
 26,759
 5,607
 6,728
 32,316
 39,044
 (11,157) 27,887
 
 04/04/2002
South Fulton Crossing 14,373
 154
 (11,434) 2,669
 424
 3,093
 (2) 3,091
 
 01/10/2007
South Semoran - Pad 1,056
 
 (129) 927
 
 927
 
 927
 
 09/06/2007
Southampton Center 4,337
 17,349
 2,829
 4,333
 20,182
 24,515
 (7,389) 17,126
 (19,555) 04/02/2001
Southgate Shopping Center 571
 3,402
 5,559
 1,152
 8,380
 9,532
 (7,001) 2,531
 
 03/26/1958
Southgate Shopping Center 232
 8,389
 723
 232
 9,112
 9,344
 (5,666) 3,678
 (6,803) 03/20/2008
Squaw Peak Plaza 816
 3,266
 3,225
 818
 6,489
 7,307
 (2,803) 4,504
 
 12/20/1994
Stella Link Shopping Center 227
 423
 1,429
 294
 1,785
 2,079
 (1,572) 507
 
 07/10/1970
Stella Link Shopping Center 2,602
 1,418
 (1,307) 2,602
 111
 2,713
 (19) 2,694
 
 08/21/2007
Stonehenge Market 4,740
 19,001
 2,212
 4,740
 21,213
 25,953
 (7,430) 18,523
 
 04/04/2002
Stony Point Plaza 3,489
 13,957
 11,341
 3,453
 25,334
 28,787
 (7,537) 21,250
 (11,402) 04/02/2001
Summerhill Plaza 1,945
 7,781
 2,572
 1,943
 10,355
 12,298
 (4,394) 7,904
 
 04/02/2001
Sunset 19 Shopping Center 5,519
 22,076
 1,430
 5,547
 23,478
 29,025
 (8,025) 21,000
 
 10/29/2001
Surf City Crossing 3,220
 52
 5,028
 2,655
 5,645
 8,300
 (1,499) 6,801
 
 12/06/2006
Tates Creek Centre 4,802
 25,366
 1,543
 5,766
 25,945
 31,711
 (7,289) 24,422
 
 03/01/2004
Taylorsville Town Center 2,179
 9,718
 945
 2,180
 10,662
 12,842
 (3,242) 9,600
 
 12/19/2003
The Centre at Post Oak 13,731
 115
 23,705
 17,874
 19,677
 37,551
 (11,113) 26,438
 
 12/31/1996
The Commons at Dexter Lake 2,923
 12,007
 2,297
 2,949
 14,278
 17,227
 (4,639) 12,588
 
 11/13/2008
The Commons at Dexter Lake II 2,023
 6,940
 307
 2,039
 7,231
 9,270
 (1,702) 7,568
 
 11/13/2008

102

Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Flamingo Pines Plaza $10,403
 $35,014
 $(15,521) $5,335
 $24,561
 $29,896
 $(4,485) $25,411
 $
 01/28/2005
Fountain Plaza 1,319
 5,276
 1,091
 1,095
 6,591
 7,686
 (3,205) 4,481
 
 03/10/1994
Francisco Center 1,999
 7,997
 4,067
 2,403
 11,660
 14,063
 (7,039) 7,024
 (9,996) 11/16/1998
Freedom Centre 2,929
 15,302
 4,774
 6,944
 16,061
 23,005
 (3,346) 19,659
 (1,294) 06/23/2006
Galleria Shopping Center 10,795
 10,339
 8,487
 10,805
 18,816
 29,621
 (2,871) 26,750
 (19,053) 12/11/2006
Galveston Place 2,713
 5,522
 6,018
 3,279
 10,974
 14,253
 (7,871) 6,382
 (1,246) 11/30/1983
Gateway Plaza 4,812
 19,249
 2,304
 4,808
 21,557
 26,365
 (6,674) 19,691
 (22,714) 04/02/2001
Gateway Station 1,622
 3
 9,209
 1,921
 8,913
 10,834
 (1,919) 8,915
 
 09/30/2009
Glenbrook Square Shopping Center 632
 3,576
 597
 632
 4,173
 4,805
 (1,931) 2,874
 (5,559) 03/20/2008
Grayson Commons 3,180
 9,023
 153
 3,163
 9,193
 12,356
 (1,903) 10,453
 (6,098) 11/09/2004
Greenhouse Marketplace 4,607
 22,771
 3,318
 4,750
 25,946
 30,696
 (5,877) 24,819
 
 01/28/2004
Griggs Road Shopping Center 257
 2,303
 140
 257
 2,443
 2,700
 (2,223) 477
 (4,271) 03/20/2008
Hallmark Town Center 1,368
 5,472
 1,032
 1,367
 6,505
 7,872
 (2,210) 5,662
 
 04/02/2001
Harrisburg Plaza 1,278
 3,924
 774
 1,278
 4,698
 5,976
 (3,919) 2,057
 (11,454) 03/20/2008
Harrison Pointe Center 8,230
 13,493
 393
 7,193
 14,923
 22,116
 (3,776) 18,340
 
 01/30/2004
HEB - Dairy Ashford & Memorial 1,717
 4,234
 
 1,717
 4,234
 5,951
 (157) 5,794
 
 03/06/2012
Heights Plaza Shopping Center 58
 699
 2,418
 928
 2,247
 3,175
 (1,216) 1,959
 
 06/30/1995
Heritage Station 6,253
 3,989
 (914) 5,746
 3,582
 9,328
 (1,015) 8,313
 (5,641) 12/15/2006
High House Crossing 2,576
 10,305
 450
 2,576
 10,755
 13,331
 (3,067) 10,264
 
 04/04/2002
Highland Square 
 
 1,887
 
 1,887
 1,887
 (380) 1,507
 
 10/06/1959
Hope Valley Commons 2,439
 8,487
 204
 2,439
 8,691
 11,130
 (542) 10,588
 
 08/31/2010
Horne Street Market 4,239
 37
 7,350
 4,446
 7,180
 11,626
 (1,448) 10,178
 
 06/30/2009
Humblewood Shopping Center 2,215
 4,724
 3,117
 1,166
 8,890
 10,056
 (8,082) 1,974
 (13,042) 03/09/1977
I45/Telephone Rd. 678
 11,182
 648
 678
 11,830
 12,508
 (5,194) 7,314
 (14,028) 03/20/2008
Killeen Marketplace 2,262
 9,048
 500
 2,275
 9,535
 11,810
 (2,983) 8,827
 
 12/21/2000
Lake Pointe Market 1,404
 
 4,244
 1,960
 3,688
 5,648
 (2,170) 3,478
 
 12/31/2004
Lake Washington Square 1,232
 4,928
 981
 1,235
 5,906
 7,141
 (1,699) 5,442
 
 06/28/2002
Lakeside Marketplace 6,064
 22,989
 3,132
 6,150
 26,035
 32,185
 (4,780) 27,405
 (17,325) 08/22/2006
Largo Mall 10,817
 40,906
 2,455
 10,810
 43,368
 54,178
 (10,074) 44,104
 
 03/01/2004
Laveen Village Marketplace 1,190
 
 4,822
 1,006
 5,006
 6,012
 (2,392) 3,620
 
 08/15/2003
Lawndale Shopping Center 82
 927
 774
 82
 1,701
 1,783
 (1,134) 649
 (3,997) 03/20/2008
League City Plaza 1,918
 7,592
 888
 1,918
 8,480
 10,398
 (4,134) 6,264
 (11,088) 03/20/2008
Leesville Towne Centre 7,183
 17,162
 1,158
 7,223
 18,280
 25,503
 (4,173) 21,330
 
 01/30/2004
Little York Plaza Shopping Center 342
 5,170
 1,834
 342
 7,004
 7,346
 (5,130) 2,216
 (4,834) 03/20/2008
Lyons Avenue Shopping Center 249
 1,183
 82
 249
 1,265
 1,514
 (1,040) 474
 (2,908) 03/20/2008

103

Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Madera Village Shopping Center $3,788
 $13,507
 $1,151
 $3,816
 $14,630
 $18,446
 $(2,457) $15,989
 $(9,114) 03/13/2007
Manhattan Plaza 4,645
 
 18,347
 4,009
 18,983
 22,992
 (8,783) 14,209
 
 12/31/2004
Market at Southside 953
 3,813
 1,290
 958
 5,098
 6,056
 (1,782) 4,274
 
 08/28/2000
Market at Town Center - Sugarland 8,600
 26,627
 23,491
 8,600
 50,118
 58,718
 (18,640) 40,078
 
 12/23/1996
Market at Westchase Shopping Center 1,199
 5,821
 2,507
 1,415
 8,112
 9,527
 (5,028) 4,499
 
 02/15/1991
Market Street Shopping Center 424
 1,271
 1,696
 424
 2,967
 3,391
 (1,750) 1,641
 
 04/26/1978
Marketplace at Seminole Outparcel 1,000
 
 46
 1,046
 
 1,046
 
 1,046
 
 08/21/2006
Marketplace at Seminole Towne 15,067
 53,743
 6,173
 21,734
 53,249
 74,983
 (8,345) 66,638
 (40,905) 08/21/2006
Markham Square Shopping Center 1,236
 3,075
 4,765
 1,139
 7,937
 9,076
 (4,887) 4,189
 
 06/18/1974
Markham West Shopping Center 2,694
 10,777
 3,957
 2,696
 14,732
 17,428
 (6,414) 11,014
 
 09/18/1998
Marshall's Plaza 1,802
 12,315
 571
 1,804
 12,884
 14,688
 (2,633) 12,055
 
 06/01/2005
Mendenhall Commons 2,655
 9,165
 427
 2,655
 9,592
 12,247
 (1,759) 10,488
 (5,797) 11/13/2008
Menifee Town Center 1,827
 7,307
 4,789
 1,824
 12,099
 13,923
 (3,474) 10,449
 
 04/02/2001
Millpond Center 3,155
 9,706
 1,516
 3,161
 11,216
 14,377
 (2,561) 11,816
 
 07/28/2005
Mission Center 1,237
 4,949
 6,236
 2,120
 10,302
 12,422
 (4,847) 7,575
 
 12/18/1995
Mohave Crossroads 3,953
 63
 35,877
 3,128
 36,765
 39,893
 (10,526) 29,367
 
 12/31/2009
Monte Vista Village Center 1,485
 58
 5,466
 755
 6,254
 7,009
 (3,301) 3,708
 
 12/31/2004
Montgomery Plaza Shopping Center 2,500
 9,961
 10,423
 2,830
 20,054
 22,884
 (10,454) 12,430
 
 06/09/1993
Moore Plaza 6,445
 26,140
 10,390
 6,487
 36,488
 42,975
 (14,805) 28,170
 
 03/20/1998
North Creek Plaza 6,915
 25,625
 3,971
 6,954
 29,557
 36,511
 (6,353) 30,158
 
 08/19/2004
North Oaks Shopping Center 3,644
 22,040
 3,962
 3,644
 26,002
 29,646
 (18,717) 10,929
 (34,019) 03/20/2008
North Towne Plaza 960
 3,928
 7,114
 879
 11,123
 12,002
 (6,931) 5,071
 (10,087) 02/15/1990
North Towne Plaza 6,646
 99
 1,528
 1,007
 7,266
 8,273
 (729) 7,544
 
 12/27/2006
North Triangle Shops 
 431
 1,236
 990
 677
 1,667
 (482) 1,185
 
 01/15/1977
Northbrook Shopping Center 1,629
 4,489
 3,048
 1,713
 7,453
 9,166
 (6,788) 2,378
 (9,323) 11/06/1967
Northwoods Shopping Center 1,768
 7,071
 278
 1,772
 7,345
 9,117
 (2,064) 7,053
 
 04/04/2002
Oak Forest Shopping Center 760
 2,726
 4,838
 748
 7,576
 8,324
 (5,167) 3,157
 (8,125) 12/30/1976
Oak Grove Market Center 5,758
 10,508
 324
 5,861
 10,729
 16,590
 (1,621) 14,969
 (7,358) 06/15/2007
Oak Park Village 678
 3,332
 51
 678
 3,383
 4,061
 (1,663) 2,398
 (4,544) 11/13/2008
Oracle Crossings 4,614
 18,274
 28,568
 10,582
 40,874
 51,456
 (5,680) 45,776
 
 01/22/2007
Oracle Wetmore Shopping Center 24,686
 26,878
 6,184
 13,813
 43,935
 57,748
 (6,117) 51,631
 
 01/22/2007
Orchard Green Shopping Center 777
 1,477
 1,994
 786
 3,462
 4,248
 (2,325) 1,923
 
 10/11/1973
Overton Park Plaza 9,266
 37,789
 8,359
 9,264
 46,150
 55,414
 (10,299) 45,115
 
 10/24/2003
Palmer Plaza 765
 3,081
 2,432
 827
 5,451
 6,278
 (3,596) 2,682
 
 07/31/1980
Palmilla Center 1,258
 
 12,970
 3,322
 10,906
 14,228
 (6,125) 8,103
 
 12/31/2002

104

Table of Contents
  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
The Shoppes at Parkwood Ranch $4,369
 $52
 $10,200
 $2,347
 $12,274
 $14,621
 $(4,917) $9,704
 $
 12/31/2009
Thompson Bridge Commons 604
 
 625
 513
 716
 1,229
 (76) 1,153
 
 04/26/2005
Thousand Oaks Shopping Center 2,973
 13,142
 372
 2,973
 13,514
 16,487
 (4,300) 12,187
 (13,670) 03/20/2008
TJ Maxx Plaza 3,400
 19,283
 1,716
 3,430
 20,969
 24,399
 (6,217) 18,182
 
 03/01/2004
Tomball Marketplace 9,616
 262
 22,837
 8,132
 24,583
 32,715
 (6,364) 26,351
 
 04/12/2006
Town & Country Shopping Center 
 3,891
 5,237
 
 9,128
 9,128
 (6,004) 3,124
 
 01/31/1989
Tropicana Beltway Center 13,947
 42,186
 632
 13,949
 42,816
 56,765
 (12,524) 44,241
 
 11/20/2007
Tropicana Marketplace 2,118
 8,477
 (2,133) 1,206
 7,256
 8,462
 (3,756) 4,706
 
 07/24/1995
Tyler Shopping Center 5
 21
 3,996
 300
 3,722
 4,022
 (2,441) 1,581
 
 12/31/2002
Valley Plaza 1,414
 5,818
 6,478
 1,422
 12,288
 13,710
 (5,464) 8,246
 
 12/31/1997
Valley Shopping Center 4,293
 13,736
 835
 8,170
 10,694
 18,864
 (2,601) 16,263
 
 04/07/2006
Valley View Shopping Center 1,006
 3,980
 2,362
 1,006
 6,342
 7,348
 (3,374) 3,974
 
 11/20/1996
Vizcaya Square Shopping Center 3,044
 12,226
 1,343
 3,044
 13,569
 16,613
 (4,093) 12,520
 
 12/18/2002
Waterford Village 5,830
 
 8,103
 2,893
 11,040
 13,933
 (4,386) 9,547
 
 06/11/2004
West Jordan Town Center 4,306
 17,776
 1,760
 4,308
 19,534
 23,842
 (5,662) 18,180
 
 12/19/2003
Westchase Shopping Center 3,085
 7,920
 7,006
 3,189
 14,822
 18,011
 (12,124) 5,887
 (936) 08/29/1978
Westgate Shopping Center 245
 1,425
 463
 239
 1,894
 2,133
 (1,606) 527
 
 07/02/1965
Westhill Village Shopping Center 408
 3,002
 4,574
 437
 7,547
 7,984
 (5,149) 2,835
 
 05/01/1958
Westland Fair 27,562
 10,506
 (9,160) 12,220
 16,688
 28,908
 (8,118) 20,790
 
 12/29/2000
Westminster Center 11,215
 44,871
 7,692
 11,204
 52,574
 63,778
 (19,286) 44,492
 (42,237) 04/02/2001
Whitehall Commons 2,529
 6,901
 449
 2,522
 7,357
 9,879
 (1,915) 7,964
 
 10/06/2005
Whole Foods @ Carrollwood 2,772
 126
 4,634
 2,854
 4,678
 7,532
 (440) 7,092
 
 09/30/2011
Winter Park Corners 2,159
 8,636
 1,317
 2,159
 9,953
 12,112
 (3,504) 8,608
 
 09/06/2001
  861,144
 2,219,059
 753,888
 822,571
 3,011,520
 3,834,091
 (1,000,692) 2,833,399
 (562,570)  
New Development:                    
Hilltop Village Center 3,196
 7,234
 40,890
 4,113
 47,207
 51,320
 (568) 50,752
 
 11/17/2011
Nottingham Commons 19,523
 2,398
 345
 19,771
 2,495
 22,266
 (3) 22,263
 
 09/24/2014
Wake Forest Crossing II 3,155
 2,617
 1,149
 3,276
 3,645
 6,921
 
 6,921
 
 06/04/2014
  25,874
 12,249
 42,384
 27,160
 53,347
 80,507
 (571) 79,936
 
  
Miscellaneous (not to exceed 5% of total) 141,767
 9,263
 10,466
 99,529
 61,967
 161,496
 (27,356) 134,140
 
  
Total of Portfolio $1,028,785
 $2,240,571
 $806,738
 $949,260
 $3,126,834
 $4,076,094
 $(1,028,619) $3,047,475
 $(562,570)  
Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Palms of Carrollwood $3,995
 $16,390
 $315
 $3,995
 $16,705
 $20,700
 $(859) $19,841
 $
 12/23/2010
Paradise Marketplace 2,153
 8,612
 (2,120) 1,197
 7,448
 8,645
 (3,538) 5,107
 
 07/20/1995
Park Plaza Shopping Center 257
 7,815
 1,071
 314
 8,829
 9,143
 (8,303) 840
 
 01/24/1975
Parkway Pointe 1,252
 5,010
 699
 1,260
 5,701
 6,961
 (1,905) 5,056
 (263) 06/29/2001
Parliament Square II 2
 10
 1,175
 3
 1,184
 1,187
 (526) 661
 
 06/24/2005
Parliament Square Shopping Center 443
 1,959
 1,391
 443
 3,350
 3,793
 (2,125) 1,668
 
 03/18/1992
Pavillions at San Mateo 3,272
 26,215
 (1,505) 4,154
 23,828
 27,982
 (7,588) 20,394
 
 04/30/2004
Perimeter Village 29,701
 42,337
 727
 34,404
 38,361
 72,765
 (5,729) 67,036
 (26,749) 07/03/2007
Phillips Crossing 
 1
 27,712
 872
 26,841
 27,713
 (6,160) 21,553
 
 09/30/2009
Phillips Landing 1,521
 1,625
 11,030
 1,819
 12,357
 14,176
 (3,254) 10,922
 
 09/30/2009
Pike Center 
 40,537
 
 
 40,537
 40,537
 (738) 39,799
 
 08/14/2012
Plantation Centre 3,463
 14,821
 1,457
 3,471
 16,270
 19,741
 (3,376) 16,365
 (1,352) 08/19/2004
Promenade 23 16,028
 2,271
 8
 16,028
 2,279
 18,307
 (181) 18,126
 
 03/25/2011
Prospector's Plaza 3,746
 14,985
 1,524
 3,716
 16,539
 20,255
 (4,999) 15,256
 
 04/02/2001
Publix at Laguna Isles 2,913
 9,554
 158
 2,914
 9,711
 12,625
 (2,304) 10,321
 
 10/31/2003
Pueblo Anozira Shopping Center 2,750
 11,000
 4,800
 2,768
 15,782
 18,550
 (7,561) 10,989
 (11,321) 06/16/1994
Rainbow Plaza 6,059
 24,234
 1,508
 6,081
 25,720
 31,801
 (10,390) 21,411
 
 10/22/1997
Rainbow Plaza I 3,883
 15,540
 641
 3,896
 16,168
 20,064
 (5,059) 15,005
 
 12/28/2000
Raintree Ranch Center 11,442
 595
 17,298
 10,983
 18,352
 29,335
 (6,085) 23,250
 
 03/31/2008
Rancho Encanto 957
 3,829
 3,777
 839
 7,724
 8,563
 (3,038) 5,525
 
 04/28/1997
Rancho San Marcos Village 3,533
 14,138
 4,158
 3,887
 17,942
 21,829
 (4,923) 16,906
 
 02/26/2003
Rancho Towne & Country 1,161
 4,647
 638
 1,166
 5,280
 6,446
 (2,357) 4,089
 
 10/16/1995
Randalls Center/Kings Crossing 3,570
 8,147
 212
 3,570
 8,359
 11,929
 (4,763) 7,166
 (12,058) 11/13/2008
Ravenstone Commons 2,616
 7,986
 (174) 2,580
 7,848
 10,428
 (1,557) 8,871
 (5,594) 03/22/2005
Red Mountain Gateway 2,166
 89
 9,553
 2,737
 9,071
 11,808
 (4,206) 7,602
 
 12/31/2003
Regency Centre 3,791
 15,390
 1,127
 2,180
 18,128
 20,308
 (3,349) 16,959
 
 07/28/2006
Regency Panera Tract 1,825
 3,126
 65
 1,400
 3,616
 5,016
 (580) 4,436
 
 07/28/2006
Reynolds Crossing 4,276
 9,186
 95
 4,276
 9,281
 13,557
 (1,535) 12,022
 
 09/14/2006
Richmond Square 1,993
 953
 13,571
 14,512
 2,005
 16,517
 (1,140) 15,377
 
 12/31/1996
Ridgeway Trace 26,629
 544
 20,181
 15,573
 31,781
 47,354
 (4,067) 43,287
 
 11/09/2006
River Oaks Shopping Center 1,354
 1,946
 405
 1,363
 2,342
 3,705
 (1,982) 1,723
 
 12/04/1992
River Oaks Shopping Center 3,534
 17,741
 35,481
 4,207
 52,549
 56,756
 (19,454) 37,302
 
 12/04/1992
River Point at Sheridan 28,898
 4,042
 (4,955) 8,586
 19,399
 27,985
 (2,480) 25,505
 (6,720) 04/01/2010
Rose-Rich Shopping Center 502
 2,738
 3,013
 486
 5,767
 6,253
 (5,311) 942
 
 03/01/1982
Roswell Corners 6,136
 21,447
 669
 5,981
 22,271
 28,252
 (5,223) 23,029
 (8,192) 06/24/2004

105

Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Roswell Crossing Shopping Center $7,625
 $18,573
 $68
 $7,625
 $18,641
 $26,266
 $(356) $25,910
 $(13,105) 07/18/2012
San Marcos Plaza 1,360
 5,439
 350
 1,358
 5,791
 7,149
 (1,780) 5,369
 
 04/02/2001
Sandy Plains Exchange 2,468
 7,549
 273
 2,469
 7,821
 10,290
 (1,945) 8,345
 (5,705) 10/17/2003
Scottsdale Horizon 
 3,241
 268
 1
 3,508
 3,509
 (554) 2,955
 
 01/22/2007
Shasta Crossroads 2,844
 11,377
 918
 2,842
 12,297
 15,139
 (3,710) 11,429
 
 04/02/2001
Sheldon Forest Shopping Center 374
 635
 329
 354
 984
 1,338
 (827) 511
 
 05/14/1970
Sheldon Forest Shopping Center 629
 1,955
 851
 629
 2,806
 3,435
 (2,685) 750
 
 05/14/1970
Shoppes at Bears Path 3,252
 5,503
 1,126
 3,290
 6,591
 9,881
 (1,180) 8,701
 (3,140) 03/13/2007
Shoppes at Memorial Villages 1,417
 4,786
 6,011
 3,332
 8,882
 12,214
 (6,197) 6,017
 
 01/11/2012
Shoppes of Parkland 5,413
 16,726
 1,066
 9,506
 13,699
 23,205
 (2,501) 20,704
 (14,552) 05/31/2006
Shoppes of South Semoran 4,283
 9,785
 (1,774) 4,745
 7,549
 12,294
 (1,270) 11,024
 (9,224) 08/31/2007
Shops at Kirby Drive 1,201
 945
 276
 1,202
 1,220
 2,422
 (229) 2,193
 
 05/27/2008
Shops at Three Corners 6,215
 9,303
 5,531
 6,224
 14,825
 21,049
 (8,852) 12,197
 
 12/31/1989
Silver Creek Plaza 3,231
 12,924
 3,176
 3,228
 16,103
 19,331
 (5,328) 14,003
 (15,486) 04/02/2001
Six Forks Shopping Center 6,678
 26,759
 3,520
 6,728
 30,229
 36,957
 (9,299) 27,658
 
 04/04/2002
South Fulton Crossing 14,373
 154
 (11,193) 2,877
 457
 3,334
 (1) 3,333
 
 01/10/2007
South Semoran - Pad 1,056
 
 (129) 927
 
 927
 
 927
 
 09/06/2007
Southampton Center 4,337
 17,349
 2,343
 4,333
 19,696
 24,029
 (6,113) 17,916
 (20,386) 04/02/2001
Southgate Shopping Center 571
 3,402
 5,535
 852
 8,656
 9,508
 (7,033) 2,475
 
 03/26/1958
Southgate Shopping Center 232
 8,389
 458
 232
 8,847
 9,079
 (5,450) 3,629
 (7,480) 03/20/2008
Spring Plaza Shopping Center 863
 2,288
 568
 863
 2,856
 3,719
 (2,320) 1,399
 (3,037) 03/20/2008
Squaw Peak Plaza 816
 3,266
 2,491
 818
 5,755
 6,573
 (2,086) 4,487
 
 12/20/1994
Steele Creek Crossing 310
 11,774
 3,245
 3,281
 12,048
 15,329
 (2,492) 12,837
 
 06/10/2005
Stella Link Shopping Center 227
 423
 1,529
 294
 1,885
 2,179
 (1,619) 560
 
 07/10/1970
Stella Link Shopping Center 2,602
 1,418
 (1,307) 2,602
 111
 2,713
 (13) 2,700
 
 08/21/2007
Stonehenge Market 4,740
 19,001
 1,373
 4,740
 20,374
 25,114
 (6,120) 18,994
 (5,470) 04/04/2002
Stony Point Plaza 3,489
 13,957
 10,013
 3,453
 24,006
 27,459
 (5,133) 22,326
 (11,721) 04/02/2001
Summer Center 2,379
 8,343
 4,074
 2,396
 12,400
 14,796
 (4,662) 10,134
 
 05/15/2001
Summerhill Plaza 1,945
 7,781
 2,080
 1,943
 9,863
 11,806
 (3,659) 8,147
 
 04/02/2001
Sunset 19 Shopping Center 5,519
 22,076
 1,290
 5,547
 23,338
 28,885
 (6,620) 22,265
 
 10/29/2001
Sunset Shopping Center 1,121
 4,484
 3,288
 1,120
 7,773
 8,893
 (2,178) 6,715
 
 04/02/2001
Surf City Crossing 3,220
 52
 4,902
 2,655
 5,519
 8,174
 (647) 7,527
 
 12/06/2006
Tates Creek Centre 4,802
 25,366
 738
 5,766
 25,140
 30,906
 (5,790) 25,116
 
 03/01/2004
Taylorsville Town Center 2,179
 9,718
 708
 2,180
 10,425
 12,605
 (2,657) 9,948
 
 12/19/2003
The Centre at Post Oak 13,731
 115
 22,534
 17,874
 18,506
 36,380
 (9,997) 26,383
 
 12/31/1996

106

Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
The Shoppes at Parkwood Ranch $4,369
 $52
 $9,933
 $2,347
 $12,007
 $14,354
 $(3,183) $11,171
 $
 12/31/2009
The Village Arcade 
 6,657
 791
 
 7,448
 7,448
 (4,813) 2,635
 
 12/31/1992
Thompson Bridge Commons 3,650
 9,264
 4,259
 3,541
 13,632
 17,173
 (2,700) 14,473
 (5,711) 04/26/2005
Thousand Oaks Shopping Center 2,973
 13,142
 247
 2,973
 13,389
 16,362
 (3,538) 12,824
 (15,031) 03/20/2008
TJ Maxx Plaza 3,400
 19,283
 1,602
 3,430
 20,855
 24,285
 (4,918) 19,367
 
 03/01/2004
Town & Country Shopping Center 
 3,891
 4,913
 
 8,804
 8,804
 (5,289) 3,515
 
 01/31/1989
Town and Country - Hammond, LA 1,030
 7,404
 1,663
 1,104
 8,993
 10,097
 (4,786) 5,311
 
 12/30/1997
Tropicana Beltway Center 13,947
 42,186
 347
 13,959
 42,521
 56,480
 (10,050) 46,430
 (32,774) 11/20/2007
Tropicana Marketplace 2,118
 8,477
 (2,002) 1,266
 7,327
 8,593
 (3,494) 5,099
 
 07/24/1995
Tyler Shopping Center 5
 21
 4,022
 300
 3,748
 4,048
 (2,154) 1,894
 
 12/31/2002
University Palms Shopping Center 2,765
 10,181
 640
 2,765
 10,821
 13,586
 (2,555) 11,031
 (8,116) 11/13/2008
University Place 10,733
 20,791
 641
 10,733
 21,432
 32,165
 (653) 31,512
 (30,780) 08/07/2012
Valley Plaza 1,414
 5,818
 4,289
 1,422
 10,099
 11,521
 (4,181) 7,340
 
 12/31/1997
Valley Shopping Center 4,293
 13,736
 757
 8,170
 10,616
 18,786
 (1,963) 16,823
 
 04/07/2006
Valley View Shopping Center 1,006
 3,980
 2,399
 1,006
 6,379
 7,385
 (3,072) 4,313
 
 11/20/1996
Village Arcade II Phase III 
 16
 15,858
 
 15,874
 15,874
 (8,658) 7,216
 
 12/31/1996
Village Arcade - Phase II 
 787
 280
 
 1,067
 1,067
 (702) 365
 
 12/31/1992
Vizcaya Square Shopping Center 3,044
 12,226
 584
 3,044
 12,810
 15,854
 (3,276) 12,578
 
 12/18/2002
West Jordan Town Center 4,306
 17,776
 1,726
 4,308
 19,500
 23,808
 (4,569) 19,239
 
 12/19/2003
Westchase Shopping Center 3,085
 7,920
 6,380
 3,189
 14,196
 17,385
 (11,831) 5,554
 (6,046) 08/29/1978
Westgate Shopping Center 245
 1,425
 595
 245
 2,020
 2,265
 (1,687) 578
 
 07/02/1965
Westhill Village Shopping Center 408
 3,002
 4,601
 437
 7,574
 8,011
 (5,134) 2,877
 
 05/01/1958
Westland Fair 27,562
 10,506
 (9,790) 12,220
 16,058
 28,278
 (7,066) 21,212
 
 12/29/2000
Westland Terrace Plaza 1,649
 6,768
 (4,411) 1,933
 2,073
 4,006
 (123) 3,883
 
 10/22/2003
Westminster Center 11,215
 44,871
 6,961
 11,204
 51,843
 63,047
 (16,038) 47,009
 (44,033) 04/02/2001
Westminster Plaza 1,759
 7,036
 473
 1,759
 7,509
 9,268
 (2,070) 7,198
 (6,330) 06/21/2002
Westwood Center 10,497
 36
 7,807
 6,018
 12,322
 18,340
 (2,148) 16,192
 
 01/26/2007
Westwood Village Shopping Center 
 6,968
 3,204
 
 10,172
 10,172
 (7,869) 2,303
 
 08/25/1978
Whitehall Commons 2,529
 6,901
 433
 2,522
 7,341
 9,863
 (1,426) 8,437
 (4,141) 10/06/2005
Whole Foods @ Carrollwood 2,772
 126
 4,594
 2,852
 4,640
 7,492
 (33) 7,459
 
 09/30/2011
Winter Park Corners 2,159
 8,636
 1,056
 2,159
 9,692
 11,851
 (2,797) 9,054
 
 09/06/2001
Waterford Village 5,830
 
 7,818
 2,893
 10,755
 13,648
 (2,847) 10,801
 
 06/11/2004
Wyoming Mall 1,919
 7,678
 2,521
 598
 11,520
 12,118
 (2,998) 9,120
 
 03/31/1995
  925,680
 2,447,031
 750,235
 880,002
 3,242,944
 4,122,946
 (989,123) 3,133,823
 (893,338)  

107

Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
Other:                    
1919 North Loop West $1,334
 $8,451
 $11,385
 $1,337
 $19,833
 $21,170
 $(6,624) $14,546
 $
 12/05/2006
Citadel Building 3,236
 6,168
 7,975
 534
 16,845
 17,379
 (13,793) 3,586
 
 12/30/1975
Houston Cold Storage Warehouse 1,087
 4,347
 2,705
 1,072
 7,067
 8,139
 (2,808) 5,331
 
 06/12/1998
Phoenix Office Building 1,696
 3,255
 967
 1,773
 4,145
 5,918
 (897) 5,021
 
 01/31/2007
  7,353
 22,221
 23,032
 4,716
 47,890
 52,606
 (24,122) 28,484
 
  
Land Held/Under Development:                    
Ambassador Parcel D - Land 98
 
 
 98
 
 98
 
 98
 
 10/26/2007
Citadel Drive at Loop 610 3,747
 
 (239) 3,508
 
 3,508
 
 3,508
 
 12/30/1975
Crabtree Commons - Land 18,810
 54
 (8,354) 10,501
 9
 10,510
 
 10,510
 
 01/13/2007
Cullen Blvd. at East Orem - Land 172
 
 (122) 50
 
 50
 
 50
 
 02/24/1975
Curry Ford Road - Land 1,878
 7
 (14) 1,870
 1
 1,871
 
 1,871
 
 10/05/2007
Decatur 215 32,525
 8,200
 (27,994) 11,586
 1,145
 12,731
 
 12,731
 
 12/26/2007
East Houston & Dyersdale 
 
 41
 41
 
 41
 
 41
 
 12/31/1970
Epic - Land 1,980
 
 799
 2,649
 130
 2,779
 
 2,779
 
 04/09/2008
Festival Plaza - Land 751
 6
 157
 913
 1
 914
 
 914
 
 12/08/2006
Gladden Farms 1,619
 4
 (155) 1,385
 83
 1,468
 
 1,468
 
 08/21/2007
Hilltop Village Center 3,196
 7,234
 16,380
 3,643
 23,167
 26,810
 
 26,810
 
 11/17/2011
Mainland Mall - 1 & 2 - Land 321
 
 (86) 235
 
 235
 
 235
 
 11/29/1967
Mohave Crossroads 1,080
 
 571
 1,516
 135
 1,651
 
 1,651
 
 06/12/2007
North Towne - Land 
 
 6,243
 6,191
 52
 6,243
 
 6,243
 
 12/27/2006
NW Freeway at Gessner - Land 5,052
 
 (4,218) 834
 
 834
 
 834
 
 11/16/1972
Palm Coast Center - Land 2,101
 18
 (1,334) 779
 6
 785
 
 785
 
 04/13/2011
Ridgeway Trace 
 
 902
 825
 77
 902
 
 902
 
 11/09/2006
River Pointe Venture 2,874
 
 (2,247) 582
 45
 627
 (2) 625
 
 08/04/2004
Rock Prairie - Land 2,364
 
 (976) 1,388
 
 1,388
 
 1,388
 
 05/15/2006
Round Rock Towne Center - Land 
 
 456
 456
 
 456
 
 456
 
 12/31/2004
Sheridan - Land 
 
 6,632
 6,632
 
 6,632
 
 6,632
 
 04/01/2010
Shoppes at Caveness Farms - Land 7,235
 135
 (873) 3,891
 2,606
 6,497
 
 6,497
 
 01/17/2006
South Fulton Crossing - Land 
 
 224
 222
 2
 224
 
 224
 
 01/10/2007
Stanford Court 693
 
 (303) 390
 
 390
 
 390
 
 04/20/1981
Stevens Ranch - Land 36,939
 46
 (5,866) 31,115
 4
 31,119
 
 31,119
 
 05/16/2007
Surf City Crossing 
 
 2,802
 2,793
 9
 2,802
 
 2,802
 
 12/06/2006

108

Schedule III

  Initial Cost to Company   Gross Amounts Carried at Close of Period        
Description Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent 
to
Acquisition
 Land 
Building and
Improvements
 
Total
(1)
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total Costs,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Encumbrances
(2)
 
Date of
Acquisition /
Construction
The Shoppes at Parkwood Ranch $1,236
 $
 $(474) $772
 $(10) $762
 $
 $762
 $
 01/02/2007
Tomball Marketplace 9,616
 262
 22,330
 8,696
 23,512
 32,208
 (3,064) 29,144
 
 04/12/2006
Village Shopping Center 64
 714
 (689) 89
 
 89
 
 89
 
 12/31/2002
Waterford Village 
 
 2,714
 2,654
 60
 2,714
 
 2,714
 
 06/11/2004
Westover Square - Land 4,435
 20
 (1,936) 2,519
 
 2,519
 
 2,519
 
 08/01/2006
Wilcrest/Bissonnet - Land 7,228
 
 (7,019) 209
 
 209
 
 209
 
 11/10/1980
Wilderness Oaks - Land 11,081
 50
 1,757
 12,882
 6
 12,888
 
 12,888
 
 06/19/2008
York Plaza 162
 
 (45) 117
 
 117
 
 117
 
 08/28/1972
  157,257
 16,750
 (936) 122,031
 51,040
 173,071
 (3,066) 170,005
 
  
Balance of Portfolio (not to exceed 5% of total) 316
 12
 50,899
 1,856
 49,371
 51,227
 (24,528) 26,699
 
  
Total of Portfolio $1,090,606
 $2,486,014
 $823,230
 $1,008,605
 $3,391,245
 $4,399,850
 $(1,040,839) $3,359,011
 $(893,338)  
___________________
(1)
The tax basisbook value of our net fixed asset exceeds the book valuetax basis by approximately $7.0$32.0 million at December 31, 20122014.
(2)
Encumbrances do not include $29.828.1 million outstanding under fixed-rate mortgage debt associated with three properties each held in a tenancy-in-common arrangement and $10.24.3 million of non-cash debt related items.

103


Schedule III

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method, generally over estimated useful lives of 18-40 years for buildings and 10-20 years for parking lot surfacing and equipment. Tenant and leasehold improvements are depreciated over the remaining life of the lease or the useful life whichever is shorter.
The changes in total cost of the properties were as follows (in thousands):
��Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Balance at beginning of year$4,688,526
 $4,777,794
 $4,658,396
$4,289,276
 $4,399,850
 $4,688,526
Additions at cost310,454
 180,956
 195,499
144,474
 279,624
 310,454
Retirements or sales(608,466) (123,252) (70,924)(348,221) (232,823) (608,466)
Property held for sale
 (94,761) 
(9,435) (155,017) 
Property transferred from held for sale (see Note 15)18,090
 
 
Property transferred from held for sale
 
 18,090
Impairment loss(8,754) (52,211) (5,177)
 (2,358) (8,754)
Balance at end of year$4,399,850
 $4,688,526
 $4,777,794
$4,076,094
 $4,289,276
 $4,399,850

109

Schedule III

The changes in accumulated depreciation were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Balance at beginning of year$1,059,531
 $971,249
 $856,281
$1,058,040
 $1,040,839
 $1,059,531
Additions at cost130,965
 133,220
 127,238
125,226
 130,698
 130,965
Retirements or sales(157,723) (23,418) (12,270)(148,882) (81,094) (157,723)
Property held for sale
 (21,520) 
(5,765) (32,403) 
Property transferred from held for sale (see Note 15)8,066
 
 
Property transferred from held for sale
 
 8,066
Balance at end of year$1,040,839
 $1,059,531
 $971,249
$1,028,619
 $1,058,040
 $1,040,839

110104



Schedule IV
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
DECEMBER 31, 20122014
(Amounts in thousands)
 State 
Interest
Rate
 
Final
Maturity
Date
 
Periodic
Payment
Terms
 
Face
Amount of
Mortgages
 
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages
(1)
 
Principal
Amount of
Loans
Subject to
Delinquent
Principal
or Interest
(2)
Shopping Centers:             
First Mortgages:             
363-410 Burma, LLCTN 6.50% 03/01/2013 $213 Annual P&I $2,291
 $2,291
  
College Park Realty
Company
NV 7.00% 10/31/2053 At Maturity 3,410
 3,410
  
American National
Insurance Company
TX 5.95% 01/01/2014 $136 Annual P&I 1,405
 1,405
  
Construction Loans:             
WRI Alliance Riley
Venture-Tranche A
CA 5.34% 01/01/2014 $4,175 Annual P&I 55,434
 55,434
  
WRI Alliance Riley
Venture-Tranche B
CA 10.00% 01/01/2014 $157 Annual P&I 740
 740
  
Weingarten I-4 Clermont
Landing, LLC
FL 2.92% 06/30/2014 $779 Annual P&I 12,254
 12,254
  
Weingarten Miller
Equiwest Salt Lake, LLC
UT 7.22% 11/19/2012 At Maturity 16,128
 16,128
 $16,128
Total Mortgage Loans on
Real Estate
        $91,662
 $91,662
 $16,128
 State 
Interest
Rate
 
Final
Maturity
Date
 
Periodic
Payment
Terms
 
Face
Amount of
Mortgages
 
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages
(1)
Shopping Centers:           
First Mortgages:           
College Park Realty CompanyNV 7.00% 10/31/2053 At Maturity $3,410
 $3,410
Total Mortgage Loans on
Real Estate
        $3,410
 $3,410
___________________
(1)
The aggregate cost at December 31, 20122014 for federal income tax purposes is $91.73.4 million, and there are no prior liens to be disclosed.
(2)The repayment of this note is being negotiated, and we do not expect to incur a loss associated with this transaction.
Changes in mortgage loans are summarized below (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 20102014 2013 2012
Balance, Beginning of Year$159,916
 $192,092
 $267,222
$15,438
 $91,662
 $159,916
New Loans
 
 4,912
Additions to Existing Loans (1)
734
 4,161
 11,961

 699
 734
Collections/Reductions of Principal(68,988) (14,464) (20,124)(12,028) (22,085) (68,988)
Reduction of Principal due to Business Combination (2)

 (21,873) (71,879)
Reduction of Principal due to Business Combinations (2)

 (54,838) 
Balance, End of Year$91,662
 $159,916
 $192,092
$3,410
 $15,438
 $91,662
___________________
(1)The caption above, “Additions to Existing Loans” also includes accrued interest.
(2)
Effective April 13, 2011, weThis caption relates to acquired our partner’s 50% interest in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture related to a development property in Palm Coast, Florida. Effective April 1, 2010, we assumed control of two50%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint ventures related to a development project in Sheridan, Colorado, which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. The notes associated with these transactions are reported as a reduction in the preceding table forinterest during the respective years. For 2011, see Note 23 for additional information.
period.

111105