Table of Contents


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 30, 201731, 2022

or

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________


Commission file number: 000-18032


latticelogocolorpmsa51.jpg
 

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

93-0835214

Delaware93-0835214

(State of Incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

111 SW Fifth Ave, Ste 700, Portland, OR

5555 NE Moore Court, Hillsboro, Oregon

97204

97124-6421

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (503) 268-8000


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Title of Class)

(Trading Symbol)

(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Common Stock, $.01 par value

NASDAQ

LSCC

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨    No þ


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨    No þ


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ    No ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ    No ¨


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smallerfiler," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company”company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer þ

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company ¨

Emerging growth company ¨


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes ¨    No þ

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 1, 2017$613,585,307
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 2, 2018124,210,928

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 2, 2022

$

4,910,050,770

 

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 13, 2023

137,382,419

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required by Part III of this Report, to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated herein by reference from the registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which definitive proxy statement shall be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this Report relates.



LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page

Page

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

2

PART I

Item 1.

PART I

Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

    

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

9

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

22

Item 2.

Properties

22

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

22

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

22

PART II

   

Item 5.

Item 6.

Item 7.

Item 7A.

Item 8.

Item 9.

Item 9A.

Item 9B.

Other Information

62

Item 9B.9C. 

PART III

    
PART III

Item 10.

Item 11.

Item 12.

Item 13.

Item 14.

PART IV

    
PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits

64

Item 15.

1



Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These involve estimates, assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Any statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, or future events or performance are not historical facts and may be forward-looking. We use words or phrases such as “anticipates,“anticipate,“believes,“believe,” “could,” “estimates,“estimate,“expects,“expect,“intends,“intend,“plans,“plan,“predicts,"possible," “predict,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “future,” “potential”“potential,” and similar words or phrases to identify forward-looking statements.


Examples of forward-looking

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about: our transitionstarget or expected financial performance and our ability to newly adopted accounting standards; the effectachieve those results; future impacts of the implementationongoing COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other pandemics, epidemics, and other public health problems; future impacts of the ongoing military conflict between Ukraine and Russia and the outbreak of new, accounting standardsor expansion of current, military conflicts or terrorism; the impact of any continuing trade or travel restrictions on adjustmentsthe export and our revenueimport of products between the U.S. and China; the impact of any deterioration in future periods;relations between Taiwan and China, and other factors affecting military, political, or economic conditions in Taiwan or elsewhere in Asia; the impact of increased inflation; the effects of climate change and disruptive natural disasters on us, our suppliers, and our consumers, including as a result of actions by governments, businesses, and consumers in response; our business strategy; the impact of tariffs, trade sanctions, license requirements or similar actions on our suppliers and customers; our opportunities to increase our addressable market; our expectations and strategies regarding market trends and opportunities, including market segment drivers such as 5G infrastructure deployments, cloud and enterprise servers, client computing platforms, industrial Internet of Things, factory automation, automotive electronics, smart homes and prosumers; our beliefs about who we may compete with and whether we are differentiated from those competitors, as well as their potential capabilities; our expectations regarding our customer base and the impacts of our customers’ actions on our business; our expectations regarding both new and existing product end market and customer mix onofferings; our gross margin in the future;growth and our strategies to achieve gross margin growth and beliefs regarding the markets we serve or may serve; growth opportunities and growth in markets we may serve;other financial results; our making significant future investments in research and development; our expectations regarding cash provided by or used in operating activities; our expectations regarding total restructuring charges under restructuring plans adopted by our Board; our expectation that we will not pay U.S. federal income taxes until we fully realize our tax net operating lossability to take advantage of the process technology development efforts of semiconductor foundries and credit carryforwards; the sufficiency of our financial resourcesapply those technologies when they become most economically beneficial to meet our working capital needs through at least the next 12 months; our strategiesus and beliefs regarding the markets we serve or may serve; growth opportunities and growth in markets we may serve; the advantages our technology provides to our customers, including advanced features in an increasingly intense global technology market; our future product development and marketing plans; our intention to continually introduce new products and enhancements and reduce manufacturing costs; our expectation of emerging technology trends; the anticipation that we will become increasingly dependent on revenue from newer products; our expectation of production volumes and the associated revenue stream for certain mobile handset providers; acceptance of our devices; our continued participation in consortia that develop and promote the High-Definition Multimedia Interface ("HDMI"), Mobile High-Definition Link ("MHL") and WirelessHD specifications, and our participation in other standard setting initiatives; the effect of termination of our agent functions regarding the HDMI consortium, related reduction in adopter fees, revenue recognition, impairment charges and any other changes in the agreements relating to various intellectual property or standards consortia and their sharing of past or present fees or royalties; our expectation that we will continue to transition to increasingly smaller geometry process technologies and the difficulties in transitioning; our need and ability to maintain or develop successful foundry relationships to produce new products; the adequacy of assembly and test capacity commitments;customers; the impact of changing foundries or OSATs or their failure to manufacture sufficient quantities of our global tax structureproducts at acceptable yields, as well as the impact of problems with other subcontractors or distributors; the impact if we are unable to detect product defects; the impact if our insurance proves to be inadequate to resolve claims against us; whether we will experience seasonality or cyclicality and the resulting effects on our business; our expectations regarding taxesabout our patent portfolio, including the expiration of patents, whether, when and tax adjustments;where we will make future filings, and the value of the patents and associated licensing agreements generally and to our conclusion that we should maintain a valuation allowance against certain tax assets;business, as well as risks arising from the licensing and sale of our belief that we may recognize certain tax benefits during the next twelve months;patents; our ability to forecast uncertain tax positions; the effectattract and retain personnel and their importance to our performance; future financial results or accounting treatments; our judgments involved in accounting matters, including revenue recognition, inventories and cost of tax reform on our financial results; our ability to forecast future salesrevenue, and the relative product mix of those revenues; our mitigation of the concentration of credit risk; our expectation thatincome taxes; actions we may consider acquisition opportunities to further extendtake regarding the design and continued effectiveness of our product or technology portfolios and further expandinternal controls over financial reporting; our product offerings;use of cash; our beliefs regarding the adequacy of our liquidity, capital resources and facilities,facilities; the impact of our debt on our future operating and financial performance, as well as the impact if we breach a loan covenant; whether we will consider and act upon acquisition opportunities to extend our product, technology and product offerings and the impact of such opportunities on our business; our expectations regarding taxes, including unrecognized tax benefits, and tax adjustments and allowances; whether we will pursue future stock repurchases and how any future repurchases will be funded; the future price volatility of our stock and the effects of that volatility; our ability to meet our operatingprevent and capital requirementsrespond to information technology system failures, security breaches and obligations;incidents, cyber-attacks or fraud; the impact of laws and regulations addressing privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity and our ability to implement a company-wide enterprise resource planning system.


Forward-lookingcomply with the same; our ability to comply with other laws and regulations, the costs of such compliance, and costs incurred if we fail to comply with such laws and regulations; and our beliefs regarding legal proceedings.

These forward-looking statements involveare based on estimates and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements expressed in the forward-looking statements. The key factors, among others, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements includedinclude the effects of pandemics or widespread global health problems and the actions by governments, businesses, and individuals in response to the situation; global economic conditions and uncertainty, including as a result of trade-related restrictions or tariffs; the concentration of our sales in the Mobile and Consumer and Communications and Computingcertain end markets, particularly as it relates to the concentration of our sales in the Asia Pacific region,region; market acceptance and demand for our existing and new products,products; market and technology trends; our ability to achieve yield and quality improvements; our ability to protect, license and sell our intellectual property,property; shortages or increased costs in our supply chain; any disruption of our distribution channels,channels; the impact of competitive products and pricing, unexpected charges, delays or results relating to our restructuring plans, unexpected complicationsespecially by companies with our implementation of a company-wide enterprise resource planning system,great resources than us; unanticipated warranty claims; the effect of theany downturn in the economy on capital markets and credit markets,markets; our failure to prevent or adequately respond to information technology system failures, security breaches and incidents, cyber-attacks, or fraud; physical and transition disruptions and costs associated with climate change; unanticipated taxation requirements or positions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing authority; unanticipated effects of tax reform,reform; unfavorable results of legal proceedings; our ability to attract and retain key personnel; the sufficiency of our insurance coverage; the impact of our outstanding indebtedness on our strategic flexibility, liquidity and results of operations; inflationary pressures; the impact of strategic transactions; or unexpected impacts of recent accounting guidance. In addition, actual results are subject to other risks and uncertainties that relate more broadly to our overall business, including those more fully described herein and that are otherwise described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including, but not limited to, the items discussed in “Risk Factors” inPart I, Item 1A, of Part I of“Risk Factors,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


You should not unduly rely on forward-looking statements because our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us. In addition, any forward-looking statement applies only as of the date on which it is made.of this filing. We do not plan to, and undertake no obligation to, update any forward-looking statements to reflect new information or new events, circumstances or circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements are madedevelopments, or to reflect the occurrenceotherwise.

2



Item 1. Business

Overview


Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Lattice,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) develop semiconductor technologies that we monetize through differentiated programmable logic semiconductor products, system solutions, design services, and licenses.


Lattice is the low power programmable leader. We solve customer problems across the network, from the Edge to the Cloud, in the growing Communications, Computing, Industrial, Automotive, and Consumer markets. Our technology, long-standing relationships, and commitment to world-class support enable our customers to quickly and easily developcreate a smart, secure, and connected products. We help their products become more aware, interact more intelligently, and make better and faster connections. In an increasingly intense global technology market, we help our customers get their products to market faster than their competitors.

world.

Our historic focus was on programmable logic devices ("PLDs"). In 2011, we made the strategic decision to competitively differentiate from other established programmable logic companies with ultra-low power and ultra-small sized field programmable gate array ("FPGA") solutions, a type of PLD. As a result, we acquired a leader in this technology, SiliconBlue Technologies, Inc. In 2015, we extendeddevices enable us to provide our capabilities beyond FPGAscustomers with the acquisition of Silicon Image, Inc. ("Silicon Image") and its portfolio of standards-driven video connectivity application specific standard products ("ASSPs"), 60 GHz mmWave devices, and associated intellectual property ("IP"). Together, the control and connect features of our FPGAs and these acquired technologies form a strong, growing base business from which we are able to offer a variety of solutions to multiple establishedcontrol, connect, and emerging markets and customers.


compute technologies. We believe thethere are multiple growth areas that will allow us to increase our addressable market. In particular, we believe there are several emerging trend of computingtrends in servers, infrastructure, and smart devices at the network edge is an opportunitythat are opportunities for Lattice. These devices often act independently and need to make instantaneous, independent decisions. As such, they need their own computing and learning capabilities to perform functions like face detection, image recognition, and video analytics — capabilities that we have today through the acquisition of Silicon Image. Lattice:

With the growth of hyperscale datacenters, our “processor agnostic” solutions are ideal for control and connect functions in enterprise and datacenter server applications.

With the expected continued Communications infrastructure build-out from 5G deployment and beyond, as well as continued datacenter network expansion, Lattice solutions are being adopted to control and connect a variety of functions in critical systems.

With the increase in electrification and the proliferation of sensors in smart factories, smart homes, and automobiles, our low power, small form factor solutions are ideal for everything from battery powered systems and sensor applications to embedded vision.

With the increase in artificial intelligence ("AI") and a multitude of applications at the network edge, Lattice devices support applications like face detection, image recognition, and video analytics.

With the demand for more hardware security in the Communications, Computing, Industrial, Automotive, and Consumer markets, our devices provide enhanced platform security.

To accomplishserve these functions, devicesemerging needs, customer solutions require high levels ofpower efficiency, memory bandwidth, processing power, speed, and memory, the need to operate with low power consumption, and the ability to integrate complex functionality into a highly compact footprint. These requirements align towith the capabilities of our FPGA devices. Our flexible, low power, small form factor, silicon, and the design flexibility of ourperformance optimized FPGAs putsput us in a unique position to meet thethese growing edge-computingmarket needs.


Our traditional FPGA devices provide us with a strong, growing base of ‘control and connect’ technologies. We believe growth in the edge connectivity and edge computing arenas will allow us to increase our market share and capabilities.

Our Markets and Customers


We sell our products globally in three marketsend market groups: Mobile and Consumer, Communications and Computing, and Industrial and Automotive.


Automotive, and Consumer. We also provide Intellectual Property ("IP") licensing and services to these end markets.

In the Mobile and Consumer Market, you can find our solutions making consumer products smarter and thinner, including: smartphones, tablets and e-readers, wearables, accessories such as chargers and docks, smart home devices, Virtual Reality ("VR") headsets, Ultra High-Definition ("UHD") TVs, digital SLR cameras, drones, and other connected devices.


Our Mobile and Consumer customers are driven by the need to deliver richer and more responsive experiences. They typically require:
More intelligence and computing power. Products need to be always-on and always-aware.
Longer battery lives for handheld devices and reduced energy consumption for plugged-in devices.
Real-time transmission of higher resolution video content on larger screen sizes.
Fast design cycles. Products must be quickly and easily differentiated.
Smaller form factors. Products need to lay flatter on the wall or fit more easily in people’s pockets.
Various levels of video processing and analytics.

Lattice solutions help solve these challenges with the following products and services:
FPGAs bring multiple benefits to our customers. An FPGA’s parallel architecture enables faster processing than competing devices, such as processors, allowing for a user experience with shorter pauses and fewer delays. Our FPGAs are among the lowest power in the industry, enabling the application processor and other high power components to remain dormant longer, resulting in longer battery life. Finally, with some of the industry’s smallest packages, we enable thinner end products.

mmWave Devices such as our SiBEAM Snap and WirelessHD products simplify connectivity. SiBEAM Snap is a wireless connection technology that can transfer a high definition movie to a mobile device in seconds while eliminating the connector port. WirelessHD products enable laptops, projectors, accessories, and other consumer products to communicate wirelessly at very high speeds.
A full suite of standards-based HDMI and MHL Video Connectivity ASSPs enable the immersive audio-visual experience that consumers demand.
Intellectual Property Licensing enables customers who wish to develop a proprietary solution to use our proven technology.

Our proprietary solutions help our customers get their products to market faster than typical development cycles. With re-programmability and flexibility, our FPGAs inherently allow our customers to have quicker product development. Our deep engagement with industry standards bodies gives us an intimate knowledge of various video technologies and the ability to get our customers latest and greatest products to market faster. Our mmWave technology is at the forefront of high speed, high bandwidth wireless connectivity innovation. All of Lattice’s solution time-to-market advantages are critical given shorter product life cycles and higher competition in our customers’ end markets.

In the Communications and Computing Market, our solutions play key roles in data centercomputing systems such as servers heterogeneous network ("HetNet") small cell base stations, network backhaul, wired access aggregation,and client devices, 5G wireless infrastructure, switches, routers, and other related applications.

Our Communications and Computing customers need to “connect anything to everything,” at ever-increasing data rates.

As data center servers become smaller and power costs become more dominant, there isaddress a growing requirement for smaller form factors with lower installed and operational costs. Lattice’s low cost per look up table, and high I/O count enable customers to use fewer devices in much smaller spaces.
Additionally, they need simplified control logic, enhanced security, and rigorous power and thermal management.
Networks typically require progressively higher bandwidth and increased reliability as more data is demanded by consumer and other connected devices. Bandwidth demands are also driven by the rapid transition to a cloud-based infrastructure.
As wireless cellsvariety of challenges.

As client compute devices become smaller and smarter, there is a need for small form factor devices with power efficiency to interface with a variety of sensors and add intelligence.

As server architectures become increasingly complex, customers need simplified control logic, enhanced hardware platform security, system status monitoring, and rigorous power and thermal management.

Networks typically require progressively higher bandwidth and increased reliability as more data is demanded by connected devices.

As wireless cellular sites become more compact, without fans, there is a growing requirement for smaller form factors optimized for low power consumption and thermal management.

Lattice FPGAs solve these customer problems. Our FPGAs are optimized for low power consumption.

To be able to connect high speed fiber to homes, campuses or city infrastructures, mmWave products enable the lowest cost, highest throughput solutions.

We help customers solve these problems with the following products:
FPGAs optimized for Input-Output (I/O)input/output ("I/O") expansion, low cost look up tables, hardware acceleration, and hardware management, and affordability.management. Our FPGAs consume power at very low power,rates, which reduces operating costs. Their small form factor enables higher functional density in less space. Finally, our FPGAs are I/O rich, which allows for more connections with system application specific integrated circuits (ASICs)("ASICs") and ASSPs. Our programmable mixed signal devices make power and thermal management easy and reliable.application specific standard products ("ASSPs").

3

mmWave transceivers feature high-integration, low power design, and internal / external antenna options. Our beam-steering technology makes point-to-point links smaller, cheaper, more reliable, lower power and easier to install, enabling backhaul at “wireless fiber” data rates.

Examples of where our products enablingenable intelligent automation in the Industrial and Automotive Market include Industrial Internet of Things ("IoT"), machine vision, robotics, factory automation, industrial handhelds, surveillance cameras and DVRs, digital signage,advanced driver assistance systems ("ADAS"), and automotive infotainment, servers, and data center networks.


infotainment.

Our Industrial and Automotive customers face numerous challenges:

As smart factories develop, sensors are proliferating and machine vision is becoming higher definition, in turn requiring increasing amounts of data to be gathered, connected, and processed.
Cars, trucks, and trains are also becoming smarter and more connected. Drivers and passengers are demanding better in-cabin experiences including entertainment, diagnostics, and enhanced safety — often involving multiple displays, cameras, and sensors.
In addition, as factories and automotive continue their evolution of computerization, lower power, faster time to design in and market, along with lower costs are becoming more of the normal.

As factories automate to improve efficiency and employee safety, sensors, machine vision, and robotics are proliferating, in turn requiring increasing amounts of data to be gathered, connected, and processed.

Automobiles and other forms of transportation are also becoming smarter and more connected. Drivers and passengers are demanding better in-cabin experiences including entertainment, diagnostics, and enhanced safety — often involving multiple displays, cameras, and sensors.

As factories and automotive manufacturers continue their evolution of computerization, power reduction, faster time to design-in and market, lower costs are becoming increasingly normal.

Our product portfolio helps solve these challenges with the following products and services:

challenges. Our small-sized, low-power FPGAs not only provide the I/O expansion, bridging, connectivity, and processing inherent in FPGAs, to the full Industrial Market, but they also form the backbone of several integrated solutions, including motor control, complete HDHigh Definition ("HD") camera and DVR solutions on a single FPGA device, and Human-Machine Interfaces (HMI)("HMI") on a chip.
Performance-tested

In the Consumer Market, you can find our solutions making products smarter and regulatory-approved mmWave modules greatly reduce latency responsesmaller, including smart home devices, prosumer devices, sound bars, high end projectors, Augmented Reality ("AR") / Virtual Reality ("VR"), and wearables.

Our Consumer customers are driven by the complexityneed to deliver richer and more responsive experiences. They typically require:

More intelligence and computing power. Products need to be "always-on" and "always-aware."

Longer battery lives for handheld devices and reduced energy consumption for plugged-in devices.

Real-time transmission of higher resolution video content on larger screen sizes.

Fast design cycles. Products must be quickly and easily differentiated.

Smaller form factors. Products need to lay flatter on the wall or fit more easily into pockets.

Various levels of video processing and analytics.

Lattice FPGAs bring multiple benefits to these customers. An FPGA’s parallel architecture enables faster processing than competing devices, such as microcontrollers, allowing for a user experience with shorter pauses and fewer delays. Our FPGAs are among the most power efficient in the industry, enabling the application processor and other high-power components to remain dormant longer, resulting in longer battery life. Finally, with some of adding high-performance wireless video capabilitiesthe industry’s smallest packages, we enable thinner and more compact end products.

Our proprietary solutions help our customers get their products to displays, withoutmarket faster than typical development cycles of custom ASICs. With re-programmability and flexibility, our FPGAs inherently allow our customers to have quicker product development. The time-to-market advantages of Lattice's solutions are critical given the wires that clutter a factory floor or medical suite.

Automotive qualified MHL / HDMI Video Connectivity ASSPs allow consumers to stream UHD video from their mobile phones to their in-car entertainment system, delivering the ultimate connected car experience.

shorter product life cycles in our customers’ end markets.

Our Products, Services, and Competition


We deliver three types of semiconductor devicesare focused on delivering FPGAs and related solutions to help solve our customers' problems: PLDs, Video Connectivity ASSPs, and mmWave devices.problems. We also serve our customers with IP licensing and various other services.


Field Programmable Gate Arrays (“FPGAs”)


FPGAs are regular arrays of logic that can be custom-configured by the user through software. This programmability allows our customers flexibility and reduced time to market while allowing us to offer the chips to many different customers in many different markets. FiveLattice FPGA product family lines anchor our FPGA offerings:

families include:

The Lattice Avant™, Certus™ and LatticeECP™ device families are our “General Purpose FPGAs” and address a broad range of applications across multiple markets. They offer customers the optimal cost per gate, Digital Signal Processing ("DSP") capability, and Serialize-Deserialize ("SERDES") connectivity. ECP devices are optimized for the Communications and Computing market but also find significant use in the Industrial, Automotive, and Consumer markets. The latest introduction in our general purpose family, Lattice Avant-E™ FPGAs, are designed to solve key customer challenges at the Edge by combining class-leading power efficiency, size and performance with an optimized feature set tailored to the needs of mid-range FPGA Edge applications like data processing and AI.

The Lattice Mach™ device family are our “Control & Security FPGAs” and are designed for platform management and security applications. They are control-oriented and offer optimized cost per I/O and cost per look-up table. Mach™ FPGAs are widely used across our three end market groups: Communications and Computing, Industrial and Automotive, and Consumer. Lattice MachXO5™-NX family, the fifth device built on the award-winning Lattice Nexus™ platform are our latest addition to the Mach™ FPGA family, enabling the latest generation of secure control through increased logic and memory resources, robust 3.3 V I/O support, and a differentiated security feature set.

The ECP families are our “Connectivity & Acceleration FPGAs.” They offer customers the lowest cost per gate, Digital Signal Processing (DSP) capability, and Serialize-Deserialize (SerDes) connectivity. ECP devices are optimized for the Communications and Computing market but also find significant use in the Industrial and Automotive market.
4

The MachXO families are known as “Bridging and Expansion FPGAs.” They are control oriented and offer the lowest cost per I/O, along with the lowest cost per look up table. MachXO families are widely used across our three primary target markets: Communications and Computing, Industrial and Automotive, and Mobile and Consumer.
iCE40 families are known as the “World’s Smallest FPGAs.” Their small size and ultra-low power make them the optimal products for customizing Consumer mobile and Industrial handheld products. The iCE40 UltraLite was named “Digital Semiconductor Product of the Year” by the 2015 Elektra European Electronics Industry Awards. In 2016, we released the latest member of the family, iCE40 UltraPlus, focused on smart phone and IoT edge devices.
CrossLink was introduced in 2016 as the world’s first video “pASSP” (programmable Application Specific Standard Part). CrossLink combines the power and speed benefits of hardened video camera and display bridging cores with the flexibility of FPGA fabric. CrossLink was the 2016 recipient of the “Editor’s Choice Award” by EEPW magazine.
Programmable Mixed Signal devices, such as our Platform Manger 2 and L-ASC10 combine programmable digital logic with analog functionality to help customers manage power, thermal, and control planes in real time.

The Lattice iCE™ device family are our “Ultra Low Power FPGAs.” Their small size and ultra-low power make them the optimal products for each of our core segments where small form factor and customizing is required. The latest member of the family, the iCE40 UltraPlus™ device, is focused on IoT Edge devices with its AI capabilities, low power, and small form factor.

The Lattice CrossLink™ device family are our "Video Connectivity FPGAs" and are optimized for high-speed video and sensor applications. CrossLink combines the power and speed benefits of hardened video camera and display bridging cores with the flexibility of FPGA fabric. Lattice CrossLinkPlus™ devices provide users with instant-on capabilities for video display. Lattice CrossLink-NX™ FPGAs, built on the Lattice Nexus platform, provide the lowest power in the smallest packages in its class, higher performance, and high reliability. These products are designed for Computing, Industrial, Automotive, and Consumer markets, but also find use in Communications.

To enable our customers to get to market faster we support theour FPGAs with intellectual propertyIP cores, reference designs, development kits, and design software.


Competition We are investing in our design software, such as Lattice Radiant™, to deliver best-in-class tools that enable predictable design convergence, and Lattice Propel™ for our FPGAs is fragmented.
Whileunparalleled ease in creating embedded processor-based designs. We have developed integrated system-level solution stacks, such as Lattice ORAN™ for robust control data security, flexible fronthaul synchronization, and low power hardware acceleration for secure, adaptable, Open Radio Access Network (ORAN) deployment, as well as Lattice sensAI™ for Edge AI applications, Lattice mVision™ for low power embedded vision, Lattice Sentry™ for implementing hardware security, and Lattice Automate™ for industrial automation and robotics. We combine all of these elements to solve specific customer problems such as the need to quickly implement low power AI inferencing in Edge applications. Further, we have application software such as Glance by Mirametrix™ that allows users to control the AI and computer vision experience of their end systems.

Depending on the application, we may compete with other FPGA vendors, as well as producers of ASICs, ASSPs, and microcontrollers have historically dominated high-volume market segments through low costmicrocontrollers. We believe that Lattice has developed products and reduced power consumption, our FPGAs have become small enoughsolutions with sufficiently low power consumption that we are now considered by customers in cases where they need the architectural benefits of FPGAs, namely programmability with its accelerated time-to-market and the speed that comes from parallelism. Not only can customers use FPGAs to add new features and support new standards, but if a customer’s design is not working as intended, the customer can quickly change it using the programmability of our FPGAs through software. In contrast, ASICs and ASSPs require time consuming and expensive redesign and fabrication. Against microcontrollers, we differentiate our products with smaller sized packages and higher performance.

Our main FPGA competitors are Xilinx and Intel. Both make FPGAs but are generally focused on the high-density end of the market, making devices that are up to a full order of magnitude larger than ours with the associated increases in power and size. differentiated advantages.

Legacy Semiconductor Products

We differentiate from them with ultra-low power and very small sized packages.


Video Connectivity ASSPs

In the Mobile and Consumer market, consumers need to connect many different types of audio-video devices and expect them to work seamlessly together. We refer to these connections as “Video Connectivity.” Industry standards, such as HDMI, MHL, and USB Type-C, ensure that consumers are able to successfully make those connections. These industry standards support resolutions up to 8K, High Dynamic Range, Deep Color, and HDCP 2.2 content protection. Ouralso sell Video Connectivity ASSPs, implement these standards along with value-added featuresalthough we are not developing new products in this area and allow consumer original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) manufacturers to quickly get feature richtheir support requirements are minimal.

IP Licensing and interoperable products to market.


Our Video Connectivity ASSPs perform many functions, including ensuring interoperability, enhancing picture quality, converting between resolutions, and transmitting / receiving content without the need for additional components. Specific device types include port processors, port controllers, video processors, transmitters, receivers, bridges, and converters. These devices are used in products such as mobile phones, UHD TVs, home theater systems, HDMI cable extenders, automotive infotainment, PCs, accessories, projectors, and monitors.

In general, our Video Connectivity competition includes:
HDMI or MHL functionality offered in either discrete devices or integrated into system-on-a-chip products. These are offered by a small number of companies.
In-house semiconductor solutions designed by large consumer electronics OEMs.
Alternative HD connectivity technologies such as DisplayPort and MiraCast, which are offered by select companies.


While our competition mainly tries to win with price, we believe that we have an advantage because of our deep engagement with industry standards bodies. This involvement enables us to bring our “standards plus” products and IP to market more quickly and gives our customers confidence that we have the expertise needed to successfully execute.

mmWave Devices

Our mmWave devices and modules allow customers to transfer data and UHD video content wirelessly at gigabit speeds. Built using our proprietary 60 GHz SiBEAM technology, our mmWave transceivers, processors, and antenna arrays are divided into three groups, differentiated by their transmission range:
Gigabit Connector devices or wireless USB “eliminate the connectors on your mobile products.” Built with SiBEAM Snap technology, these devices connect consumer products to deliver up to 12 Gb/s of bi-directional bandwidth for ultra-fast data transfers and are effective across centimeter distances.
Our Gigabit Indoor devices and modules utilizing WiGig “cut the wires in home, office, and factory.” Geared around the Consumer and Industrial Markets these devices deliver "Blu-ray" quality video at 1080p and 4k20 resolutions with 5ms average latency and reach distances measured in meters.
Gigabit Outdoor products provide “wireless fiber for network backhaul.” Gigabit-speed 60 GHz modules and devices address the need for high capacity wireless links in wireless broadband networks, urban LTE small cells and metro Wi-Fi hot spots, and other link applications. Achieving a range of 100’s of meters these devices provide the Communications market with ultra-high speed links for point-to-point connectivity.

Our competition includes a small number of established semiconductor companies that work to create an advantage by bundling mmWave technology into their reference designs and processors. We believe that the depth of our 60 GHz experience enables us to get products to market faster and when combined with advanced features, such as our advanced beam-forming technology, gives us an edge over our competition.

Intellectual Property (IP) Licensing

Services

Lattice has a broad set of technological capabilities and many U.S. and international patents. We generate revenue from our technology portfolio via upfront fees and on-going royalty payments with three sets ofthrough the following activities:

1.

Standard IP Licensing - these activities include our participation in two consortia for the licensing of HDMIHigh-Definition Multimedia Interface™ ("HDMI") and MHLMobile High-Definition Link™ ("MHL") standard technologies to customers who adopt the technology into their products and voluntarily report their usage and royalties. The royalties are split between consortiaamong consortium members, including us.

2.

IP Core Licensing - some customers need Lattice’s technology for specific functions or features, but for various reasons are not able to use our silicon solutions. In those cases, we may sell themlicense our IP cores, which they can integrate into their own ASICs. In contrast to the use of consortia, these licensing activities are generally performed internally.

3.

Patent Monetization - we sellconsider sales of certain patents from our portfolio generally for technology that we are no longer actively developing. The revenue from these sales generally consists of upfront payments and potential future royalties.

IP Services - we undergo projects and design services for customers who wish to develop specific solutions that harness our proven technology and expertise.


Simplay Labs

Simplay Labs develops performance standards, testing services, development tools, and technologies for Mobile and Consumer product manufacturers. We sold certain of our assets comprising Simply Labs to Invecas, Inc. on September 30, 2017 while maintaining a contractual relationship that includes hosting the personnel engaged in the provision of testing services and related assets in various geographies for a term. By partnering with Simplay Labs, manufacturers can reduce the time and cost to market, providing products that are distinguished by reliability and ease of operation while delivering the high-performance HD their customers demand. The products that Simplay Labs tests include televisions, A/V receivers, sound bars, set-top boxes, gaming consoles, and media hubs. Simplay Labs has service centers operating in the United States, South Korea, China, and Taiwan. Simplay’s service centers provide compliance, interoperability and performance testing.

Research and Development

We place a substantial emphasis on new product development, where return on investment is the key driver, anddriver. We believe that continued investment in research and development is required to maintain and improve our competitive position. Our productresearch and development activities emphasizeare focused on new proprietary products, advanced packaging, enhancement of existing products and process technologies, improvement ofproduct enhancements, software development tools, development of innovative technology standards,soft IP cores, and enhanced services. Researchapplication focused hardware and software solutions. These research and development activities occur primarily at our sites in Hillsboro, Oregon; San Jose, California; Montreal, Canada; Shanghai, China; and Muntinlupa City, Philippines.


ResearchPhilippines; and development expenses were $103.4 million in 2017, $117.5 million in 2016, and $136.9 million in 2015. The decreases in research and development expense is due mainly to the cost reductions realized from the restructuring actions and integration of operations undertaken since the acquisition of Silicon Image, including headcount reductions, site consolidations, and the sales of assets and business units. Penang, Malaysia.

We believe that a continued commitment to research and development is essential to maintaining product leadership and providing a strong cadence of innovative new product offerings and, therefore, we expect to continue to make significant future investments in research and development.



Operations


We do not manufacture our own silicon products. Weoperate primarily as a fabless semiconductor provider and, therefore, we maintain strategic relationships with large, established semiconductor foundries to source our finished silicon wafers.wafers and manufacture our silicon products. This strategy allows us to focus our internal resources on product and market development and eliminateseliminate the fixed cost of owning and operating semiconductor manufacturing facilities. We are able to take advantage of the ongoing advanced process technology development efforts of semiconductor foundries and to choose to apply those technologies when they become most economically beneficial to us and to our customers.

5


Seiko Epson ("Epson") manufactures our 500nm, 350nm, 250nm and 180nm products. Lattice and Fujitsu Limited ("Fujitsu") have entered into agreements pursuant to which Fujitsu manufactures our next generation products on its 130nm, 90nm and 65nm CMOS process technologies, as well as embedded flash memory in these technical nodes. United Microelectronics Corporation ("UMC") manufactures certain

All of our assembly and volume test operations are performed by outside suppliers.

We rely on third party vendors to provide cost-effective and efficient supply chain services. Among other activities, these outsourced services relate to direct sales logistics, includingwhich include order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing, and the shipment of inventory to third party distributors.


Wafer Fabrication

Lattice partners with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") to develop and manufacture on 16nm technology, which is used in our Avant platform of FPGA products, and to manufacture our 350nm, 130nm, 55nm and 40nm products. We perform certain test operationspartner with Samsung Semiconductor ("Samsung") to develop and manufacture the first low-power FPGA on 28nm fully depleted silicon-on-insulator ("FD-SOI") technology, which is used in our Nexus platform of FPGA products. We partner with United Microelectronics Corporation ("UMC") and its subsidiary United Semiconductor Japan Corporation ("USJC") to manufacture our products on its 130nm, 90nm, 65nm, and 40nm CMOS process technologies, as well as reliabilityembedded flash memory in these process nodes. We partner with Seiko Epson ("Epson") to manufacture our 500nm, 350nm, 250nm and quality assurance processes internally. We have achieved and maintained ISO9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Certification and released a line of products qualified to the AEC-Q100 Reliability Standard.


Wafer Fabrication

180nm products.

We source silicon wafers from our foundry partners, FujitsuTSMC, Samsung, UMC, USJC, and Epson, in Japan, and TSMC and UMC in Taiwan, pursuant to agreements with each company and their respective affiliates. We negotiate wafer volumes, prices, and other terms with our foundry partners and their respective affiliates on a periodic basis.


Assembly


All of our assembly and test operations are performed by industry-leading outsourced assembly and test suppliers ("OSATs") with our primary supplier being Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. ("ASE"). We perform certain test operations as well as reliability and quality assurance processes internally during the development process. We have achieved and maintained ISO9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Certification and released a line of products qualified to the AEC-Q100 Reliability Standard in support of Automotive product offerings in addition to ISO26262 certification on both Automotive products and software.

After wafer fabrication and initial testing, we ship wafers to independent subcontractors for assembly. During assembly, wafers are separated into individual die and encapsulated in plastic packages. We have qualified two major assembly partners, ASE and Amkor Technology ("Amkor") and are second sourced where volume and customer requirements are necessary. All ASE and Amkor manufacturing of our products is in Asia. We negotiate assembly prices, volumes, and other terms with our assembly partners and their respective affiliates on a periodic basis.


We currently offer an extensive list of standard products in lead (Pb) free packaging. Our lead-free products meet the European Parliament Directive entitled "Restrictions on the use of Hazardous Substances" ("ROHS"RoHS"). A select and growing subset of our ROHSRoHS compliant products are also offered with a "Halogen Free" material set.


Testing (Sort and Final Test)


We electrically sort test the die on most wafers prior to shipment for assembly. Wafer sort testing is primarily performed mostly by ASE in Taiwan and Malaysia, Amkor in Japan, and we have aour second source, King Yuan Electronics Co. (“KYEC”) in KYEC Taiwan. Some legacy products are tested at Unisem, Indonesia.


Following assembly, but prior to customer shipment, each product undergoes final testing and quality assurance procedures. Final testing is performed by ASE and Amkor, our assembly partners in Asia.


Amkor.

Sales and Revenue


We generate revenue by monetizing our technology designs and patents using two go-to-market strategies.

Productthrough product and Technology Sales involvetechnology sales. This involves distribution channel and direct and channel sales of silicon based silicon-based hardware and silicon-enabling products, with their associated solutions and services.
Intellectual Property Licensing involves eitheras well as the licenselicensing or sale of intellectual propertyIP that we have developed or acquired, some of which we use in our products.

Seasonality

While we periodically may experience some seasonal trends in the sale of our products, general economic conditions and the cyclical nature of the end markets we serve generally have a greater impact on our business and financial results than seasonal trends.


Backlog

Our backlog consists of orders from distributors and certain OEMsdesign services that require delivery within the next year. Historically, our backlog has not been a predictor of future sales or customer demand for the following reasons:
Purchase orders, consistent with common industry practices, can generally be revised or canceled up to 30 days before the scheduled delivery date without significant penalty.
Our backlog for sell-through distributors is valued at list price, which in most cases is substantially higher than the prices ultimately recognized as revenue.
A sizable portion of our revenue comes from our "turns business," where the product is ordered and delivered within the same quarter.

A portion of our revenue arises from vendor managed inventory arrangements where the timing and volume of customer utilization is difficult to predict.

we may provide.

Sales and Customers


We primarily sell our products to end customers from Lattice Semiconductor Corporation or our wholly-owned subsidiary, Lattice SG Pte. Ltd. WeLtd. Independent distributors are significant customers, and a substantial portion of our sales are made into this channel. Additionally, we sell both directly and through a network of independent manufacturers' representatives. Additionally, we sell indirectly through independent sell-in (primarily Japan) and sell-through distributors. We also employ a direct sales management and field applications engineering organization to support our end customers and indirect sales resources. Our endEnd customers for our products are primarily original equipment manufacturersOriginal Equipment Manufacturers ("OEMs") in the Communications and Computing, Mobile and Consumer, and Industrial and Automotive, and Consumer end markets.


We have agreements with 20 manufacturers' representatives in North America. We have established Our sales channels in over 44 foreign countriesteam attempts to drive multi-generational design wins within these OEMs and maintain a network of 10 international sales representatives. A substantial portion ofleverages our sales are made through distributors.

distribution partners to grow our broad customer base.

We provide global technical support to our end customers with engineering staff based at our headquarters, product development centers, and selected field sales offices. We maintain numerous domestic and international field sales offices in major metropolitan areas.

In fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, sales to distributors accounted for approximately 66%89%, 87%, and 83%, respectively, of our net revenue in fiscal 2017, approximately 61% of our net revenue in fiscal 2016, and approximately 45% of our net revenue in fiscal 2015, and we expect our distributors to generate a significant portion of our revenue in the future.revenue. We depend on our distributors to sell our products to end customers, complete order fulfillment, and maintain sufficient inventory of our products. Our distributors also provide technical support and other value-added services to our end customers. We have twomultiple global sell-through distributors. We also have regional distribution in Asia, Japan, Israel,Europe, and North America,Israel, and we sell through three major on-line distributors.


In fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, our revenue was broadly distributed across end markets and end customers, with no individual end customer accounting for more than 10% of the total revenue.

Revenue from foreign sales as a percentage of total revenue was 87%86%, 88%, and 92%,89% for fiscal 2017, 2016,2022, 2021, and 2015,2020, respectively. We assign revenue to geographies based on customer ship-to address at the point where revenue is recognized. Revenue attributed to China for fiscal 2017 was approximately 50%location of total revenue, compared to 44% and 41% in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively (see "Geographic Information" in Note 22 - Segment and Geographic Information to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8). In the case of sell-in distributors and OEMs, revenue is typically recognized, and geography is assigned, when products are shipped. In the case of sell-through distributors, revenue is recognized when resale to the end customer occurs and geography is assigned based on the end customer location on the resale reports provided by the distributor.customers. Both foreign and domestic sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.

The composition

Backlog

Our backlog consists of orders from distributors and certain OEMs that generally require delivery within the next year. Historically, our revenue by geography, based on ship-to location, is as follows:

 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Asia$277,638
 72% $305,093
 71% $308,534
 76% (9) (1)
Europe44,547
 12
 59,835
 14
 55,596
 14
 (26) 8
Americas63,776
 16
 62,126
 15
 41,836
 10
 3
 48
Total revenue$385,961
 100% $427,054
 100% $405,966
 100% (10) 5


Intellectual Property,backlog has not been a predictor of future sales or customer demand for the following reasons:

Purchase orders, consistent with common industry practices, generally can be revised or canceled up to 60 days before the scheduled delivery date without significant penalty.

A portion of our revenue comes from our "turns business," where the product is ordered and delivered within the same quarter.

Seasonality

We periodically experience variability in our sales volumes and financial results due to seasonal trends in the end markets we serve, the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, and general economic conditions.

IP, Patents, and Licensing


Intellectual Property

We seek to protect our products, technologies, and technologiesIP primarily through patents, trade secrecy measures,secrets, copyrights, mask work protection, trademark registrations, licensing restrictions, confidentiality agreements, and other approaches designed to protect proprietary information. There can be no assurance that others may not independently develop competitive technology not covered by our intellectual property rights or that measures we take to protect our technology will be effective.


Patents

We hold numerous United States and international patents and have patent applications pending in the United States and internationally. In addition to protecting innovations designed into our products, our ownership and maintenance of patents is an important factor in the determination of our share of the royalties from the implementation of the HDMI standard. Our current patents will expire at various times between 2018 and 2036,over the next 20 years, subject to our payment of periodic maintenance fees. There can be no assurance that pending or future patent applications will result in issued patents, or that any issued patents will survive challenges to their validity. Although weWe believe that our patents have value, there can be no assurance that our patents, or any additional patents that may be issuedand we expect to file future patent applications in both the future, will provide meaningful protection from competition. We believe that our success will depend primarily upon the technical expertise, experience,United States and creativity, and the sales and marketing abilities of our personnel.

Patent and other proprietary rights infringement claims are common in our industry. There can be no assurance that, with respect to any claim made against us,abroad on significant inventions, as we would be able to successfully defend against the claim or that we could obtain a license that would allow us to use the proprietary rights on terms or under conditions that would not harm our business.

Licenses

deem appropriate. We have acquired various licenses from third parties to certain technologies that are implemented in IP cores or embedded in our products. ThoseThese licenses support our continuing ability to make and sell these products to our customers. While our various licensesIP rights are important to our success, we believe our business as a whole is not materially dependent on any particular patent or license, or any particular group of patents or licenses.

Our Team

Human Capital Management

We provide a safe and positive work environment that emphasizes respect for individuals, ethical conduct, and learning and development that is facilitated by a direct employee engagement model. The health and safety of our employees is of utmost importance to us. We have aligned to local COVID-19 guidance to return to normal operations while maintaining actions to safeguard the health and well-being of our employees and our business. Recognizing and respecting our global presence, we strive to maintain a diverse and inclusive workforce everywhere we operate. As of December 30, 2017,31, 2022, we had 834 full-time949 employees worldwide.

We believe our employees are the foundation of our success and that our future success will depend,growth depends, in part, on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilledkey executive, technical, sales, and management personnel. NoneDue to our growth and cadence of new product introductions we are particularly focused on highly skilled engineers involved in the design, development, and support of new and existing products and processes. In order for us to attract the best talent, we provide a collaborative, diverse, inclusive, and innovative work environment, competitive compensation, and recognition to give our employees the opportunity to grow. We are focused on developing diverse teams and continuing to build an inclusive culture that inspires leadership, encourages innovative thinking, and supports the development and advancement of all.

Our human capital management objectives include identifying, recruiting, incentivizing, and integrating our existing and future employees. We strive to attract and retain talented employees by offering competitive compensation and benefits that support their health, financial, and emotional well-being. Our compensation philosophy is based on rewarding each employee’s individual and team contributions and striving to achieve equal pay for equal work. We use a combination of fixed and variable pay including base salary, bonuses, performance awards, and stock-based compensation. The principal purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain, and motivate employees through the granting of stock-based compensation awards. We offer employees benefits that vary by country and are represented by a collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced any work stoppagesdesigned to address local laws and consider our employee relationscultures and to be good.competitive in the marketplace.

Corporate Background


Lattice was incorporated in Oregon in 1983Information and reincorporated in Delaware in 1985. Public Information Availability

Our corporate headquarters isare located at 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 700, Portland,5555 NE Moore Court, Hillsboro, Oregon 97204,97124, and our website is www.latticesemi.com.www.latticesemi.com. Information contained or referenced on our website is not incorporated by reference into, and does not form a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol LSCC.


Reporting Calendar

We report based on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. Our fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015 were 52-week years that ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and January 2, 2016, respectively. Our fiscal 2018 will be a 52-week year and will end on December 29, 2018. All references to quarterly or yearly financial results are references to the results for the relevant fiscal period.

Our results for the year ended January 2, 2016 (fiscal 2015) include the results associated with the acquisition of Silicon Image for the approximately 10-month period from March 11, 2015 through January 2, 2016. Results presented for periods prior to fiscal 2015 are those historically reported for Lattice only.


Available Information

We make available, free of charge through the Investor Relations section of our website at www.latticesemi.com,ir.latticesemi.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to those reports and statements as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. You may also obtain free copies of these materials by contacting our Investor Relations Department at 111 SW Fifth Ave, Ste. 700, Portland,5555 NE Moore Court, Hillsboro, Oregon 97204,97124, telephone (503) 268-8000. Our SEC filings are also available at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Our Investor Relations website also provides notifications of news or announcements regarding our financial performance and theyother items that may be readmaterial or of interest to our investors and copied at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Informationfor complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD, including SEC filings, press releases, earnings releases, and webcasts of our earnings calls. Further, corporate governance information, including our corporate governance policies, director code of ethics, code of conduct, board committee charters, conflict minerals report and conflict minerals policy, is also available on the operationinvestor relations section of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. our website.

The content on any website referred to in this filing is not incorporated by reference into this filing unless expressly noted otherwise.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors


The following risk factors and all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered in their entirety before making an investment decision relating to our common stock. If any of the risks described below occur, our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.affected, and the trading price of our common stock could decline. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may impairmaterially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results. Effects from global health, business, or political events, and the related impacts to economic and operating conditions, may further affect the volatility or degree of known and unknown risks.

Risk Factor Summary

Factors Related to Economic, Legal, Regulatory & Political Business Conditions

Economic, legal, regulatory, political, and business conditions related to our global business.
The impact of tariffs, trade sanctions or similar actions on our business.
The impact of pandemics or widespread global health problems on our business.

Factors Related to Manufacturing our Products

Geopolitical exposure of our subcontractors that we rely on to supply silicon wafers, packaging, and testing to manufacture our semiconductor products.
Our achievement of continued yield and quality improvements to meet our internal cost and customer quality goals, and the potential impact of shortages in, or increased costs of, wafers and other materials.
Potential warranty claims and other costs related to our products.

Factors Related to Intellectual Property and Litigation

Fluctuations in our revenue and margins caused by the intellectual property licensing component of our business strategy.
Material fluctuations in our revenue and gross margins caused by intermittent sales of patents and significant licensing transactions.
The impact of actual and potential litigation and unfavorable results of legal proceedings on our business.
Variability in our share of royalties for the HDMI standard as a result of our evolving participation in the HDMI standard.
Our ability to protect our new and existing intellectual property rights.

Factors Related to Overall Business & Operations

Proper functioning of our information technology systems, including in response to data breaches, cyber-attacks, or cyber-fraud.
The impact of climate change on our business.
Goodwill impairments and other impairments under U.S. GAAP that may impact our business.
Changes to financial accounting standards applicable to us and any related changes to our business practices.
Exposure to unanticipated tax consequences as a result of changes in effective tax rates, tax laws and our global organizational structure and operations.
Weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and business processes.
Our ability to compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of, or inability to attract, such personnel.
Our failure to adequately foresee and insure against risks related to our business.
Limitations to our flexibility caused by our outstanding indebtedness.

Factors Related to Our Markets and Product Development

Cyclical market patterns and potential downturns in our industry or our end markets.
Our ability to develop and introduce new products that achieve customer and market acceptance.
Competition with companies that have significantly greater resources than us and numerous other product solutions.
Our reliance on independent contractors and third parties to provide key services in our product development and operations.

Factors Related to Our Sales and Revenue

Our dependence on our distributors and a concentrated group of end customers.
Fluctuations in and the unpredictability of our business and our sales cycles.
Accounting requirements related to sales through our distribution channel.

General Risk Factors

Our operations are subject to the effects of rising inflation and recessionary concerns.
Disruptions to our worldwide operations and supply chain due to natural or human-induced disasters.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to volatility.
Disruption in and impacts of acquisitions, divestitures, strategic investments and strategic partnerships on our business.

Factors Related to Economic, Legal, Regulatory & Political Business Conditions

Our global business operations expose us to various economic, legal, regulatory, political, and business risks, which could impact our business, operating results and financial results.


condition.

We have significant domestic and international operations. Our international operations include foreign sales offices to support our international customers and distributors, which account for the majority of our revenue, and operational and research and development sites in China, the Philippines, and other Asian locations. In addition, we purchase our wafers from foreign foundries; have our commercial products assembled, packaged, and tested by subcontractors located outside of the United States; and rely on international service providers for inventory management, order fulfillment, and direct sales logistics.

Worldwide political and economic conditions may create uncertainties that could adversely affect our business. For example, the continuing military conflict between Ukraine and Russia, as well as the financial and trade-related restrictions associated with Russia and Belarus and economic sanctions on certain individuals and entities in Russia and Belarus, may further disrupt global supply chains and could result in shortages of key materials that our suppliers and foundry partners require to satisfy our needs. Additionally, the U.S. government announced new controls regarding semiconductor- and supercomputer-related products and new restrictions affecting U.S. persons’ ability to send certain chips and chip-related technology and software to China without an export license. These controls may also impact the global supply chain and could result in shortages of key materials that our suppliers and foundry partners require to satisfy our needs. Any deterioration in the relations between Taiwan and China, and other factors affecting military, political or economic conditions in Taiwan or elsewhere in Asia, could adversely impact our third-party manufacturing partners and suppliers located in the region, which could disrupt our business operations. Countries in Europe and Asia have proposed, or recently adopted, significant increases in their military budgets and the outbreak of new, or expansion of current, military conflicts could adversely affect our business. Furthermore, adverse macroeconomic conditions, such as rising inflation and labor shortages, may affect demand for our products or increase our product or labor costs, negatively impacting our revenues, gross margins, and overall financial results.

Our domestic and international business activities are subject to economic, political and regulatory risks, including: increased inflation; volatility in financial markets; fluctuations in consumer liquidity; changes in interest rates; price increases for materials and components; trade barriers or changes in trade policies; political instability; acts of war or terrorism; natural disasters; economic sanctions; weak economic conditions; environmental regulations; labor regulations; disruptions to labor markets; import and export regulations; tax or freight rates; duties; trade restrictions; interruptions in transportation or infrastructure; anti-corruption laws; domestic and foreign governmental regulations; potential vulnerability of and reduced protection for intellectual property; disruptions or delays in production or shipments; and instability or fluctuations in currency exchange rates, any of which could lead to decreased demand for our products or a limited numberchange in our results of independent suppliers for the manufacture of alloperation. Although our business has not been materially impacted by supply chain constraints, inflation, or labor market disruptions, events outside of our productscontrol could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition in the future. Uncertainty about future political and economic conditions makes forecasting demand and providing guidance difficult. Accordingly, our expectations are subject to change without warning and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on them.

If we fail to comply with the many laws and regulations to which we are subject, both within the United States and internationally, we may be subject to significant fines, penalties or liabilities for noncompliance, which could harm our business and financial results. For example, effective May 2018, the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which established new requirements regarding the handling of personal data and non-compliance monetary penalties of up to the higher of 20 million Euros or 4% of worldwide revenue. Effective January 2020, California adopted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which imposes significant fines and penalties for violations. Additionally, the California Privacy Rights Act, which extends and expands the CCPA, became effective January 2023. Other states in the United States have proposed, and in certain cases enacted, legislation similar to the CCPA. Other countries outside of the European Union, including the United Kingdom, China, and Brazil, also have enacted robust legislation addressing privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity and providing for substantial penalties for noncompliance. We anticipate that our efforts to comply with evolving laws and regulations addressing privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity will be a failurerigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business and may require us to change our policies and practices. Additionally, as a public company, we are subject to the requirements of federal securities laws, requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the rules and regulations of the SEC, and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Noncompliance with these requirements could result in penalties, fines, liabilities, or reputational harm, which could harm our business or financial results.

Any inability or perceived inability to adequately comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in claims, demands, and litigation by private actors or governmental authorities, investigations and other proceedings by governmental authorities, injunctive relief, fines, penalties, and other liabilities, any of which may harm our suppliersreputation and market position and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business could suffer as a result of tariffs and trade sanctions or similar actions.

The imposition by the United States of tariffs, sanctions or other restrictions on goods imported from outside of the United States or countermeasures imposed in response to provide timely, cost-effective, and quality productssuch government actions could adversely affect our operations or our ability to sell our products globally, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial results.


condition. The materials subject to these tariffs may impact the cost of raw materials used by our suppliers or in our customers’ products. The imposition of further tariffs by the United States on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken in response to additional tariffs, could increase costs in our supply chain or reduce demand of our customers’ products, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our customers or suppliers could also become subject to U.S. regulatory scrutiny or export restrictions. For example, in 2019 the U.S. Justice Department filed criminal charges against one of our customers in China and imposed a licensing requirement on this customer with a policy of denial for some items, which has limited our ability to do business with this customer. In 2020, the U.S. imposed additional regulatory restrictions on the sale of U.S. controlled technology to customers in China, including establishing additional licensing requirements for the sale of U.S.-originated technology for certain applications or to companies that participate in the Chinese national security supply chain and limiting the fabrication of devices for certain Chinese companies where U.S. technology is involved in the fabrication process. Furthermore, in August 2020 the U.S. established additional licensing requirements for one of our China customers and its affiliates that limit any sales of products to that customer or for that customer’s products absent a license. The U.S. government may add additional Chinese companies to its restricted entity list or impose additional licensing requirements that we may be unable to meet in a timely manner or at all. Additionally, in October 2022 the U.S. government announced new controls regarding semiconductor- and supercomputer-related products and new restrictions affecting U.S. persons’ ability to send certain chips and chip-related technology and software to China without an export license, which may impact the global supply chain and could negatively affect our business.

Where license requirements are imposed, there can be no assurance that the U.S. government will grant licenses to permit the continuation of business with these customers. Future sanctions similar to those imposed in the past and to those recently imposed could adversely affect our ability to earn revenue from these and similar customers. In addition, the imposition of sanctions or other restrictions on customers in China may cause those customers to seek domestic alternatives to our products and those of other United States semiconductor companies. Further, the Chinese government has developed an unreliable entity list, which limits the ability of companies on the list to engage in business with Chinese customers. We dependcannot predict what impact these and future actions, sanctions or criminal charges could have on independent foundriesour customers or suppliers, and therefore our business. If any of our other customers or suppliers become subject to sanctions or other regulatory scrutiny, if our customers are affected by tariffs or other government trade restrictions, or if we become subject to retaliatory regulatory measures, our business and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Pandemics or other widespread public health problems could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition in a material way.

Pandemics, epidemics or other widespread public health problems, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, could negatively impact our business. Outbreaks have, and could again, result in significant government measures to control the spread of disease, including, among others, restrictions on travel, manufacturing, and the movement of employees. If, for example, pandemics were to occur in ways that significantly disrupt the manufacture, shipment, and buying patterns of our products or the products of our customers, this may materially negatively impact our operating results, including revenue, gross margins, operating margins, cash flows and other operating results, and our overall business. Disruptions to manufacturing and shipping could also constrain our supplies, leading to operational delays, disruptions and inflationary pressures. Our customers may also experience closures of their manufacturing facilities or inability to obtain other components, either of which could negatively impact demand for our solutions.

For example, the spread and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout Asia and other jurisdictions in which we operate continues to fluctuate and its impacts remain uncertain. The majority of our products are manufactured, assembled, and tested by third parties in Asia. In addition, we also have other operations in China, the Philippines, and the United States. We rely on third party vendors for certain logistics and shipping operations throughout the world, including in Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Recently, China relaxed government restrictions related to controlling the spread of COVID-19, which may result in disruptions to our manufacturing, supply chain and operations.

The ultimate impact of a pandemic on our operations and financial performance depends on many factors that are not within our control, including, but not limited, to: governmental, business, and individuals’ responses; general economic uncertainty in key global markets; volatility in financial markets, labor markets, and supply chains; global economic conditions and levels of economic growth; and the pace of recovery when the pandemic subsides. Pandemics may negatively impact the overall economy and, as a result of the foregoing, could negatively impact our operating results and may do so in a material way. In particular, pandemics or other widespread public health problems may increase or change the severity of our other risks reported in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Factors Related to Manufacturing our Products

We rely on subcontractors to supply and fabricate silicon wafers and to perform assembly and test operations for our semiconductor products. If they are unable to do so on a timely and cost-effective basis in sufficient quantities and using competitive technologies, we may incur significant costs or delays.

We rely on foundries in Japan, Korea and Taiwan to supply and fabricate silicon wafers for our products. These foundries include Fujitsu in Japan andsemiconductor products, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Semiconductor, United Microelectronics Corporation, in Taiwan, which supply the majority of our programmable logic wafers, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, which supplies most of our HDMI and MHL integrated circuits. We negotiate wafer volumes, prices, and other terms with our foundry partners and their respective affiliates on a periodic basis typically resulting in short-term agreements which do not ensure long-term supply or allocation commitments.Seiko Epson. We rely on our OSATs in Malaysia, Taiwan and Japan to support the packaging and test of our products, including Advanced Semiconductor Engineering and Amkor Technology.  Our success is dependent upon our ability to successfully partner with our foundry partnersand OSAT suppliers and their ability to produce wafers and finished semiconductor products with competitive prices and performance attributes. attributes, including smaller process geometries, which ability may be impacted by labor market disruptions and rising inflation. Establishing, maintaining and managing multiple foundry and OSAT relationships requires the investment of management resources and costs.

If we fail to maintain our foundry and OSAT relationships, if these partners do not provide facilities and support for our development efforts, if they are insolvent or experience financial difficulty, if their operations are interrupted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, or if we elect or are required to change foundries that supplyor OSATs, we may incur significant costs and delays. If our wafers experience manufacturing problems, including unacceptable yields, delays in the realization of the requisite process technologies,foundry or difficulties due to limitations of new and existing process technologies, our operating results could be adversely affected.


If for any reason the foundriesOSAT partners are unable to, or do not, manufacture sufficient quantities of our products or continue to manufacture a product for the full life of the product,at acceptable yields, we may be required to allocate the affected products among our customers, prematurely limit or discontinue the sales of certain products, or incur significant costs to transfer products to other foundries andor OSATs, which could adversely affect our customer relationships and operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, weak economic conditions may adversely impactresults.

Our margins are dependent on our achieving continued yield and quality improvements, cost reductions, and the financial health and viability of the foundries and cause them to limit or discontinue their business operations, resulting in shortages of supply and an inability to meet their commitments to us, which could adversely affect our financial conditioncost of wafers and operating results.


A disruption of one or more of our foundry partners' operations as a result of a fire, earthquake, act of terrorism, political or labor unrest, governmental uncertainty, war, disease, or other natural disaster or catastrophic event, or any other reason, could disrupt our wafer supply and could adversely affect our operating results.

Establishing, maintaining and managing multiple foundry relationships requires the investment of management resources as well as additional costs. If we fail to maintain our foundry relationships, or elect or are required to change foundries, we will incur significant costs and manufacturing delays. The success of certain of our next generation products is dependent upon our ability to successfully partner with Fujitsu, Taiwan Semiconductor, Seiko Epson, and other foundry partners. If for any reason one or more of our foundry partners does not provide its facilities and support for our development efforts, we may be unable to effectively develop new products in a timely manner.

Should a change in foundry relationships be required, we may be unsuccessful in establishing new foundry relationships for our current or next generation products, or we may incur substantial cost or manufacturing delays until we form and ramp relationships and migrate products, all of which could adversely affect our operating results.

We depend on distributors to generate a significant portion of our revenue and complete order fulfillment and any adverse change in our relationship or our distributors' financial health, reduction of selling efforts, or inaccuracy in resale reports could harm our sales or result in misreporting our results.

We depend on our distributors to sell our products to end customers, complete order fulfillment, and maintain sufficient inventory of our products. Our distributors also provide technical support and other value-added services to our end customers. Resales through sell-through distributors accounted for 66% of our total revenue in fiscal 2017, with two distributors accounting for 51% of our total revenue in fiscal 2017.


We expect our distributors to generate a significant portion of our revenue in the future. Any adverse change to our relationships with our distributors or a failure by one or more of our distributors to perform its obligations to us could have a material impact on our business. In addition, a significant reduction of effort by a distributor to sell our products or a material change in our relationship with one or more distributors may reduce our access to certain end customers and adversely affect our ability to sell our products.

The financial health of our distributors is important to our success. Economic conditions may adversely impact the financial health of one or more of our distributors. This could result in the inability of distributors to finance the purchase of our products or cause the distributors to delay payment of their obligation to us and increase our credit risk. If the financial health of our distributors impairs their performance and we are unable to secure alternate distributors, our financial condition and results of operations may be negatively impacted.

Since we have limited ability to forecast inventory levels of our end customers, it is possible that there may be significant build-up of inventories in the distributor channel, with the OEM or the OEM’s contract manufacturer. Such a buildup could result in a slowdown in orders, requests for returns from customers, or requests to move out planned shipments. This could adversely affect our revenues and profits. Any failure to manage these challenges could disrupt or reduce sales of our products and unfavorably impact our financial results.

Based on our assessment of the implementation of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), we believe the most significant impact of the new standard will be to accelerate the timing of revenue recognition on product shipments to our sell-through distributors. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, the new guidance would require us to recognize revenue and costs relating to such sales upon shipment to the distributor - subject to reductions for estimated reserves for price adjustments and returns - rather than upon the ultimate sale by the distributor to its end customer, as is our current practice. The impact of this change will depend primarily on the level of inventory held by sell-through distributors at the beginning and end of each period. To the extent these inventory levels fluctuate significantly, revenue under the new standard could be materially different than that under the current standard.

We depend on the timeliness and accuracy of resale reports from our distributors. Late or inaccurate resale reports could have a detrimental effect on our ability to properly recognize revenue, especially under the new revenue standard, and on our ability to predict future sales.

We depend on a concentrated group of customers for a significant portion of our revenues. If any of these customers reduce their use of our products, our revenue could decrease significantly.

A significant portion of our revenue depends on sales to a limited number of customers. In fiscal 2017, our largest end customer accounted for approximately 7% of our total revenue, and our top five end customers accounted for approximately 26% of our total revenue. If any of these relationships were to diminish, if these customers were to develop their own solutions or adopt alternative solutions or competitors' solutions, or if our relationship with any future customer which accounts for a significant portion of our revenue were to diminish due to these factors, our results could be adversely affected.

While we strive to maintain strong relationships with our customers, their continued use of our products is frequently reevaluated, as certain of our customers' product life cycles are relatively short and they continually develop new products. The selection process for our products to be included in our customers' new products is highly competitive. There are no guarantees that our products will be included in the next generation of products introduced by these customers. For example, one of our largest customers from the second half of 2016 through the first half of 2017 was a major mobile handset provider. The production volume for this mobile handset peaked in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, and the associated revenue stream has declined in subsequent quarters as the end product completes its lifecycle. At this time, there is no guarantee that our products will be included in this provider's next generation handset, nor in any of its other devices. Any significant loss of, or a significant reduction in purchases by, one or more of these customers or their failure to meet their commitments to us, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If any one or more of our concentrated groups of customers were to experience significantly adverse financial conditions, our financial condition and business could be adversely affected as well.

Our success and future revenue depends on our ability to innovate, develop and introduce new products that achieve customer and market acceptance and to successfully compete in the highly competitive semiconductor industry, and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The semiconductor industry is highly competitive and many of our direct and indirect competitors have substantially greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing, and sales resources. Consolidation in our industry may increasingly mean that our competitors have greater resources, or other synergies, that could put us at a competitive disadvantage. We currently compete directly with companies that have licensed our technology or have developed similar products, as well as numerous semiconductor companies that offer products based on alternative solutions, such as applications processor, application specific standard product, microcontroller, analog, and digital signal processing technologies. Competition from these semiconductor companies may intensify as we offer more products in any of our end markets. These competitors include established, multinational semiconductor companies, as well as emerging companies.

The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid technology and product evolution, generally followed by a relatively longer process of ramping up to volume production on advanced technologies. Our markets are also characterized by evolving industry standards, frequent new product introduction, short product life cycles, and increased demand for higher levels of integration and smaller process geometry. Our competitive position and success depends on our ability to innovate, develop, and introduce new products that compete effectively on the basis of price, density, functionality, power consumption, form factor, and performance addressing the evolving needs of the markets we serve. These new products typically are more technologically complex than their predecessors.

Our future growth and the success of new product introductions depend upon numerous factors, including:

timely completion and introduction of new product designs;
ability to generate new design opportunities and design wins, including those which result in sales of significant volume;
availability of specialized field application engineering resources supporting demand creation and customer adoption of new products;
ability to utilize advanced manufacturing process technologies;
achieving acceptable yields and obtaining adequate production capacity from our wafer foundries and assembly and test subcontractors;
ability to obtain advanced packaging;
availability of supporting software design tools;
utilization of predefined IP logic;
market acceptance of our MHL-enabled and wireless mobile products, and our 60 GHz wireless products;
customer acceptance of advanced features in our new products;
availability of competing alternative technologies; and
market acceptance of our customers' products.

Our product innovation and development efforts may not be successful; our new products, MHL-enabled products, and 60GHz wireless products may not achieve market or customer acceptance; and we may not achieve the necessary volume of production to achieve acceptable cost. Revenue relating to our mature products is expected to decline in the future, which is normal for our product life cycles. As a result, we may be increasingly dependent on revenue derived from our newer products as well as anticipated cost reductions in the manufacture of our current products. materials.

We rely on obtaining yield, quality, productivity, and logistic improvements and corresponding cost reductions in the manufacture of existing products and on introducing new products that incorporate advanced features and other price/performance factors that enable us to increase revenues while maintaining acceptable margins. To the extent that such cost reductions and new product introductions do not occur in a timely manner, because of inflation, increases in personnel costs, employee turnover, or other factors, or that our products do not achieve market acceptance or market acceptance at acceptable pricing, our forecasts of future revenue,margins, operating results, and financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.


Our outstanding indebtedness could reduce

Furthermore, worldwide manufacturing capacity for our strategic flexibility and liquidity and may have other adverse effects on our results of operations.


In connection with our acquisition of Silicon Image, we entered into a secured Credit Agreement providing for a $350 million term loan that matures on March 10, 2021. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our U.S. subsidiaries. Our obligations include a requirement to pay up to 75% of our excess cash flow toward repayment of the facility. The Credit Agreement also contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on liens, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, payment of dividends, and additional indebtedness. The amount and terms of our indebtedness, as well as our credit rating, could have important consequences, including the following:

weproducts may be more vulnerableimpacted by many factors which may impact availability and cost. If the demand for silicon wafers or assembly material exceeds market supply, or if suppliers increase prices to economic downturns, less able to withstand competitive pressures, and less flexiblecover the cost of rising inflation, our supply of silicon wafers or assembly material could quickly become limited or prohibitively expensive. A shortage in responding to changing business and economic conditions;
our cash flow from operations may be allocated to the payment of outstanding indebtedness, and not to research and development, operations or business growth;
we might not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or other sources to enable us to meet our payment obligations under the facility and to fund other liquidity needs;
manufacturing capacity could hinder our ability to make distributions tomeet product demand and therefore reduce our stockholders inrevenue. Silicon wafers constitute a sale or liquidation may be limited until any balance on the facility is repaid in full;material portion of our product cost, and
our ability to incur additional debt, including for working capital, acquisitions, or other needs, is more limited.

If we breach a loan covenant, the lenders could accelerate the repayment of the term loan. We might not have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness upon acceleration. If if we are unable to repay the indebtedness, the lenders could initiate a bankruptcy proceeding against uspurchase wafers at favorable prices, due to supply constraints, inflation, or collection proceedings with respectother factors, our margins, results of operations, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may be subject to warranty claims and other costs related to our assetsproducts.

In general, we warrant our products for varying lengths of time against non-conformance to our specifications and subsidiaries securing the facility, whichcertain other defects. Because our products, including hardware, software, and intellectual property cores, are highly complex and increasingly incorporate advanced technology, our quality assurance programs may not detect all defects, whether these are specific manufacturing defects affecting individual products or these are systemic defects that could materially decrease the valueaffect numerous shipments. Our inability to detect a defect could result in a diversion of our common stock.



engineering resources from product development efforts, increased engineering expenses to remediate the defect, and increased costs due to customer accommodation or inventory impairment charges. On occasion, we have also repaired or replaced certain components, made software fixes, or refunded the purchase price or license fee paid by our customers due to product or software defects. Our insurance may be inadequate to protect against these issues. If there are significant product defects, the costs to remediate such defects, net of reimbursed amounts from our vendors, if any, or to resolve warranty claims may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and may harm our reputation.

Factors Related to Intellectual Property and Litigation

The intellectual property licensing component of our business strategy increases our business risk and fluctuation of our revenue.


revenue and margins.

Our business strategy includes licensing our intellectual property to companies that incorporate it into their respective technologies that address multiple markets, in which we do not directly participate or compete. We also license our intellectual property intoincluding markets where we do participate and compete. Our licensingLicensing and services revenue may be impacted by the introduction of new technologies by customers in place of the technologies based on our intellectual property,we license, changes in the law that may weaken our ability to prevent the use of our patented technology by others, the expiration of our patents, and changes of demand or selling prices for products using licensed patents. We cannot assure that our licensing customers will continue to license our technology on commercially favorable terms or at all, or that these customers will introduce and sell products incorporating our technology, accurately report royalties owed to us, pay agreed upon royalties, honor agreed upon market restrictions, or maintain the confidentiality of our proprietary information, or will not infringe upon or misappropriate our intellectual property. Our intellectual property licensing agreements are complex and may depend upon many factors that require significant judgments, including completion of milestones, allocation of values to delivered items and customer acceptances. Manyacceptance.

Our sale of patents and intermittent significant judgments. Additionally, this is a relatively new end market for us, with which we do not yet have extensive experience.


licensing transactions can cause material fluctuations in our revenue and gross margins.

We have also generated revenue from the sale of certain patents from our portfolio in the past, generally for non-core technology that we are no longer actively developing. While we plan to continue to monetize our patent portfolio through sales of non-core patents, we may not be able to realize adequate interest or prices for those patents. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to generate revenue from these sales. In addition, although we seek to be strategic in our decisions to sell patents, we might incur reputational harm if a purchaser of our patents sues one of our customers for infringement of the purchased patent, and we might later decide to enter a space that requires the use of one or more of the patents we sold. In addition, as we sell groups of patents, we no longer have the opportunity to further sell or to license those patents and receive a continuing royalty stream.


Our licensingLicensing and services revenue fluctuates, sometimes significantly, from period to period because it is heavily dependent on a few key transactions being completed in a given period, the timing of which is difficult to predict and may not match our expectations. Licensing and services revenue may include revenue from the sales of patents, which may be difficult to complete and which may have complex terms for the payment which affects revenue recognition. Because of its high margin, the licensingLicensing and services revenue portion of our overall revenue can have a disproportionate impact on gross profit and profitability. GeneratingIn addition, generating revenue from patent sales and intellectual property licenses is a lengthy and complex process that may last beyond the period in which our efforts begin, and the accounting rules governing the recognition of revenue from patent sales and intellectual property licensing transactions are increasingly complex and subject to interpretation.require significant judgment. As a result, the amount of license revenue recognized in any period may differ significantly from our expectations.


The semiconductor industry routinely experiences cyclical market patterns

Litigation and a significant industry downturn could adversely affect our operating results.


Our revenue and gross margin can fluctuate significantly due to downturns in the semiconductor industry. These downturns can be severe and prolonged and can result in price erosion and weak demand for our products. Weak demand for our products resulting from general economic conditions affecting the end markets we serve or the semiconductor industry specifically and reduced spending by our customers can result, and in the past has resulted, in excess and obsolete inventories and corresponding inventory write-downs. The dynamics of the markets in which we operate make prediction of and timely reaction to such events difficult. Due to these and other factors, our past results are not reliable predictors of our future results.

Our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations of future sales. Many of our expenses, particularly those relating to facilities, capital equipment, and other overhead, are relatively fixed. We might be unable to reduce spending quickly enough to compensate for reductions in sales. Accordingly, shortfalls in sales could adversely affect our operating results.

General economic conditions and deterioration in the global business environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Adverse economic conditions or our customers’ perceptions of the economic environment may negatively affect customer demand for our products and services and result in delayed or decreased spending. Weak global economic conditions in the past have resulted in weak demand for our products in certain geographies and had an adverse impact on ourunfavorable results of operations. If global economic conditions weaken, our business could be harmed due to customers or potential customers reducing or delaying orders. In addition, the inability of customers to obtain credit, the insolvency of one or more customers, or the insolvency of key suppliers could result in sales or production delays. Any of these effects could impact our ability to effectively manage inventory levels and collect receivables, require additional restructuring actions, and decrease our revenue and profitability. Uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments. Any or all of these factorslegal proceedings could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in the future.


We may experience difficulties in transitioningoperating results.

From time to smaller geometry process technologies or in achieving higher levels of design integration, which may result in reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product deliveries, and increased expenses.


To remain competitive,time, we expect to continue to transition our semiconductor products to increasingly smaller geometries. This requires us to change the manufacturing processes for our products and to redesign some products as well as standard cells and other integrated circuit designs we may use in multiple products. We periodically evaluate the benefits, on a product-by-product basis, of migrating to smaller geometry process technologies to reduce our costs. The transition to lower nanometer geometry process technologies will result in significantly higher mask and prototyping costs, as well as additional expenditures for engineering design tools.

We depend on our relationships with our foundry partners to transition to smaller geometry processes successfully. We make no assurance that our foundry partners will be able to effectively manage the transition in a timely manner, or at all. If we or any of our foundry partners experience significant delays in this transition or fail to efficiently implement this transition, we could experience reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product deliveries, and increased expenses, all of which could adversely affect our relationships with our customers and our financial condition and operating results.

Foreign sales, accounting for the majority of our revenue, are subject to various risks associatedlegal proceedings and claims that arise out of the ordinary conduct of our business. Certain claims may not yet be resolved, including but not limited to any that are discussed under Note 15 - Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report, and additional claims may arise in the future. Results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with sellingcertainty. Regardless of merit or outcome, claims or litigation may be both time-consuming and disruptive to our operations and cause significant expense and diversion of management attention and we may enter into material settlements to avoid these risks. Should we fail to prevail in international markets, which could havecertain matters or enter into a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition,settlement, we may be faced with significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us that could materially and results of operations.

We derive the majority of our revenue from sales outside of the United States. Accordingly, if we experience a decline in foreign sales, our operating results could be adversely affected. Our foreign sales are subject to numerous risks, including:

changes in local economic conditions;
currency exchange rate volatility;
governmental stimulus packages, controls, and trade restrictions;
governmental policies that promote development and consumption of domestic products;
export license requirements, foreign trade compliance matters, and restrictions on the use of technology;
political instability, war, terrorism, or pandemic disease;
changes in tax rates, tariffs, or freight rates;
reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
longer receivable collection periods;
natural or man-made disasters in the countries where we sell our products;
interruptions in transportation;
interruptions in the global communication infrastructure; and
labor regulations.

Any of these factors could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results of operations in the future.

We have significant international operations exposing us to various economic, regulatory, political, and business risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have significant international operations, including foreign sales offices to support our international customers and distributors, and operational and research and development sites in China, India, the Philippines, and other Asian locations. In addition, we purchase our wafers from foreign foundries; have our commercial products assembled, packaged, and tested by subcontractors located outside of the United States; and rely on an international service provider for inventory management, order fulfillment, and direct sales logistics.

These and other integral business activities outside of the United States are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with conducting business in foreign economic and regulatory environments including trade barriers; economic sanctions; environmental regulations; import and export regulations; duties and tariffs and other trade restrictions; changes in trade policies; anti-corruption laws; domestic and foreign governmental regulations; potential vulnerability of and reduced protection for intellectual property; disruptions or delays in production or shipments; and instability or fluctuations in currency exchange rates, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. In addition, with the acquisition of Silicon Image, we have increased the operational challenges of conducting our business in and across multiple geographic regions around the world, especially in the face of different business practices, social norms, and legal standards.

Moreover, our financial condition and results of operations could be affected in the event of political instability, including as a result of the United Kingdom referendum on June 23, 2016, in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (commonly referred to as "Brexit"), terrorist activity, U.S. or other military actions, or economic crises in countries where our main wafer suppliers, end customers, contract manufacturers, and logistics providers are located.


The Mobile and Consumer end market is rapidly changing and cyclical, and a downturn in this end market or our failure to accurately predict the frequency, duration, timing, and severity of these cycles could adversely affect our financial condition and results.

With the acquisition of Silicon Image, the Mobile and Consumer end market has increased in importance to us. Revenue from the Mobile and Consumer end market accounted for 28% of our revenue in fiscal 2017. Revenue from the Mobile and Consumer end market consists primarily of revenue from our products designed and used in a broad range of consumer electronics products including smartphones, tablets and e-readers, wearables, accessories such as chargers and docks, Ultra High-Definition (UHD) TVs, Digital SLR cameras, drones, and other connected devices. This market is characterized by rapidly changing requirements and product features and volatility in consumer demand. Our success in this market will depend principally on our ability to:

meet the market windows for consumer products;
predict technology and market trends;
develop IP cores to meet emerging market needs;
develop products on a timely basis;
maintain multiple design wins across different markets and customers to dampen the effects of market volatility;
be designed into our customers' products; and
avoid cancellations or delay of products.

Our inability to accomplish any of the foregoing, or to offset the volatility of this end market through diversification into other markets, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Cyclicality in the Mobile and Consumer end market could periodically result in higher or lower levels of revenue and revenue concentration with a single or small number of customers. In addition, rapid changes in this market may affect demand for our products, and may cause our revenue derived from sales in this market to vary significantly over time, adversely affecting our financial results.

A downturn in the Communications and Computing end market could cause a meaningful reduction in demand for our products and limit our ability to maintain revenue levels and operating results.

Revenue from the Communications and Computing end market accounted for 29% of our revenue in fiscal 2017. Three of our top five programmable logic customers participate primarily in the Communications and Computing end market. In the past, cyclical weakening in demand for programmable logic products from customers in the Communications and Computing end market has adversely affected our revenue and operating results. In addition, telecommunication equipment providers are building network infrastructure for which we compete for product sales. Any deterioration in the Communications and Computing end market, our end customers' reduction in spending, or a reduction in spending by their customers to support this end market or use of our competitors’ products could lead to a reduction in demand for our products which could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations. This type of decline impacted our results in the past and could do so again in the future.

A single large customer may be in a position to demand certain functionality, pricing or timing requirements that may detract from or interfere with our normal business activities. If this happens, delays in our normal development schedules could occur, causing our products to miss market windows, thereby reducing the total number of units sold of a particular product.

The products we develop are complex and require significant planning and resources. In the Mobile and Consumer end market, new products are typically introduced early in the year, often in association with key trade shows. In order to meet these deadlines, our customers must complete their product development by year-end, which usually means we must ship sample parts in early spring. If we cannot ship sample parts in early spring, customers may be forced to remove the feature provided by our product, use a competitor’s product, or use an alternate technology in order to meet their timelines. We plan our product development with these market windows in mind, but if we receive requests from a large customer to deploy resources to meet their requirements or work on a specific solution, our normal development path could be delayed, causing us to miss sample deadlines and therefore future revenues.

We rely on information technology systems, and failure of these systems to function properly may cause business disruptions.

We rely in part on various information technology ("IT") systems to manage our operations, including financial reporting, and we regularly make changes to improve them as necessary by periodically implementing new, or upgrading or enhancing existing, operational and IT systems, procedures, and controls. We have undergone a significant integration and systems implementation following the acquisition of Silicon Image.

We have recently implemented a new enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system to standardize our processes worldwide and adopt best-in-class capabilities. We converted to the new ERP system at the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We have committed significant resources to this new ERP system, which replaces multiple legacy systems, and realizing the full functionality of this conversion is extremely complex, in part, because of the wide range of processes and the multiple legacy systems that must be integrated.

As a result of the conversion process and during our initial use of the new ERP system, we may experience delays or disruptions in the integration of our new or enhanced systems, procedures, or controls. We may also encounter errors in data, an inability to accurately process or record transactions, and security or technical reliability issues. All of these could harm our ability to conduct core operating functions such as processing invoices, shipping and receiving, recording and reporting financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis, and could impact our internal control compliance efforts. If the technical solution or end user training are inadequate, it could limit our ability to manufacture and ship products as planned.

These systems are also subject to power and telecommunication outages or other general system failures. Failure of our IT systems or difficulties or delays in managing and integrating them could impact the company's ability to perform necessary operations, which could materially adversely affect our business.

Acquisitions, strategic investments and strategic partnerships present risks, and we may not realize the goals that were contemplated at the time of a transaction.

On March 10, 2015, we acquired Silicon Image, and we may make further acquisitions and strategic investments in the future. Acquisitions and strategic investments, including our acquisition of Silicon Image, present risks, including:

our ongoing business may be disrupted and our management's attention may be diverted by investment, acquisition, transition, or integration activities;
an acquisition or strategic investment may not perform as well or further our business strategy as we expected, and we may not integrate an acquired company or technology as successfully as we expected;
we may incur unexpected costs, claims, or liabilities that we assume from an acquired company or technology or that are otherwise related to an acquisition;
we may discover adverse conditions post-acquisition that are not covered by representations and warranties;
we may increase some of our risks, such as increasing customer or end product concentration;
we may have difficulty incorporating acquired technologies or products with our existing product lines;
we may have higher than anticipated costs in continuing support and development of acquired products, and in general and administrative functions that support such products;
we may have difficulty integrating and retaining key personnel;
we may have difficulty integrating business systems, processes, and tools, such as accounting software, inventory management systems, or revenue systems which may have an adverse effect on our business;
our liquidity and/or capital structure may be adversely impacted;
our strategic investments may not perform as expected;
we may experience unexpected changes in how we are required to account for our acquisitions and strategic investments pursuant to U.S. GAAP;
we may have difficulty integrating acquired entities into our global tax structure with potentially negative impacts on our effective tax rate;
if the acquisition or strategic investment does not perform as projected, we might take a charge to earnings due to impaired goodwill;
we may divest certain assets of acquired businesses, leading to charges against earnings;
we may experience unexpected negative responses from vendors or customers to the acquisition, which may adversely impact our operations; and
we may have difficulty integrating the processes and control environment.

The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or several concurrent acquisitions or strategic investments. In addition, we may enter into strategic partnerships with third parties with the goal of gaining access to new and innovative products and technologies. Strategic partnerships pose many of the same risks as acquisitions or investments.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to complete any future acquisitions or that we will realize any anticipated benefits from any of our past or future acquisitions, strategic investments, or strategic partnerships. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition opportunities that are available at attractive valuations, if at all. A sustained decline in the price of our common stock may make it more difficult and expensive to initiate or complete additional acquisitions on commercially acceptable terms.

We are required under U.S. GAAP to test goodwill for possible impairment on an annual basis and to test goodwill and long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, for impairment at any other time that circumstances arise indicating the carrying value may not be recoverable.For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, the Company currently operates as one reporting unit: the core Lattice ("Core") business, which includes intellectual property and semiconductor devices. No impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded in either fiscal year 2017 or 2016, and no impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded for the Core segment in fiscal 2015. Impairment charges related to amortizable intangible assets from the Silicon Image acquisition totaled approximately $32.4 million and $7.9 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. There is no assurance that future impairment tests will indicate that goodwill or amortizable intangible assets will be deemed recoverable. As we continue to review our business operations and test for impairment or in connection with possible sales of assets, we may have impairment charges in the future, which may be material.

A number of factors, including our inventory strategy, can impact our gross margins.

A number of factors, including how products are manufactured to support the consumer market segment, yield, wafer pricing, cost of packaging raw materials, product mix, market acceptance of our new products, competitive pricing dynamics, geographic and/or end market mix, and pricing strategies, can cause our gross margins to fluctuate significantly either positively or negatively from period to period. In addition, forecasting our gross margins is difficult because a significant portion of our business is based on turns within the same quarter.

Our customers typically test and evaluate our products prior to deciding to design our product into their own products, and then require additional time to begin volume production of those products. This lengthy sales cycle may cause us to experience significant delays and to incur additional inventory costs until we generate revenue from our products. It is possible that we may never generate any revenue from products after incurring significant expenditures.

While our sales cycles are typically long, our average product life cycles tend to be short as a result of the rapidly changing technology environment in which we operate. In addition, our inventory levels may be higher than historical norms, from time to time, due to inventory build decisions aimed at meeting expected demand from a single large customer, reducing direct material cost or enabling responsiveness to expected demand. In the event the expected demand does not materialize, or if our short sales cycle does not generate sufficient revenue, we may be subject to incremental excess and obsolescence costs. In addition, future product cost reductions could impact our inventory valuation, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We and our connectivity customers depend on the availability of certain functions and capabilities within mobile and personal computing operating systems over which we may have no control. New releases of these operating systems may render certain of our products inoperable or may require significant engineering effort to create new device driver software.

Certain portions of our business operate within a market that is dominated by a few key OEMs. These OEMs could play a role in driving the growth of our business or could prevent our growth through deliberate or non-deliberate action. We do not have a presence in the Windows eco-system or in all iOS or Android devices. Our success and ability to grow depend upon our ability to continue to be successful within the iOS and Android eco-systems or gain significant traction within the Windows eco-system. Failure to maintain and grow our presence in these key eco-systems could adversely affect unit volumes.

Further, many of our products depend on the availability of certain functionality in the device operating system, typically Android, Linux, Windows, or iOS. Certain operating system primitives are needed to support video output. We have no control over these operating systems or the companies that produce them, and it is unlikely that we could influence any internal decision these companies make that may have a negative impact on our integrated circuits and their function. Updates to these operating systems that, for example, change the way video is output or remove the ability to output video could materially affect sales of MHL and HDMI integrated circuits.

Products targeted to personal computing or mobile, laptop, or notebook designs often require device driver software to operate. This software is difficult to produce and may require certifications before being released. Failure to produce this software could have a negative impact on our relation with operating system providers and may damage our reputation with end consumers as a quality supplier of products.

Shortages in, or increased costs of, wafers and materials could adversely impact our gross margins and lead to reduced revenues.

Worldwide manufacturing capacity for silicon wafers is relatively inelastic. If the demand for silicon wafers or assembly material materially exceeds market supply, our supply of silicon wafers or assembly material could quickly become limited. A shortage in manufacturing capacity could hinder our ability to meet product demand and therefore reduce our revenue. In addition, silicon wafers constitute a material portion of our product cost. If we are unable to purchase wafers at favorable prices, our gross margins will be adversely affected.

We depend on independent contractors for most of our assembly and test services, and disruption of their services, or an increased in cost of these services, could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on subcontractors to assemble, test, and ship our products with acceptable quality and yield levels. Our operations and operating results may be adversely affected if we experience problems with our subcontractors that impact the delivery of product to our customers. Those problems may include: prolonged inability to obtain wafers or packaging materials with competitive performance and cost attributes; inability to achieve adequate yields or timely delivery; disruption or defects in assembly, test, or shipping services; or delays in stabilizing manufacturing processes or ramping up volume for new products. Economic conditions may adversely impact the financial health and viability of our subcontractors and result in their inability to meet their commitments to us resulting in product shortages, quality assurance problems, reduced revenue, and/or increased costs which could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.


In the past, we have experienced delays in obtaining assembled and tested products and in securing assembly and test capacity commitments from our suppliers. We currently anticipate that our assembly and test capacity commitments are adequate; however, these existing commitments may not be sufficient for us to satisfy customer demand in future periods. We negotiate assembly and test prices and capacity commitments from our contractors on a periodic basis. If any of our assembly or test contractors reduce their capacity commitment or increase their prices, and we cannot find alternative sources, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We rely on independent software and hardware developers and disruption of their services could negatively affect our operations and financial results.

We rely on independent software and hardware developers for the design, development, supply, and support of intellectual property cores; design and development software; and certain elements of evaluation boards. As a result, failure or significant delay to complete software or deliver hardware in accordance with our plans, specifications, and agreements could disrupt the release of or introduction of new or existing products, which could be detrimental to the capability of our new or existing products to win designs. Any of these delays or inability to complete the design or development could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.

business.

Our participation in the HDMI standard is evolving, and MHL has included our acting as agent for these consortia for which we have been receivingshare of adopter fees. We no longer act as agentfees and royalties for the HDMI standard and there is no guarantee that we will continuesubject to act as agent for the MHL standard. Accordingly, we now receive a reduced share of HDMI adopter fees and we could in the future lose MHL adopter fees.


Through our wholly owned subsidiary, HDMI Licensing, LLC, we acted as agent of the HDMI consortium until December 31, 2016 and were responsible for promoting and administering the specification. We received all of the adopter fees paid by adopters of the HDMI specification in connection with our role as agent. In September 2016, the founders of the HDMI consortium ("Founders"), of which we are a member, amended the Founders Agreement resulting in changes to our role as agent for the HDMI consortium and to the model for sharing adopter fee revenues. Under the terms of the agreement, our role as the agent was terminated effective January 1, 2017 and a new independent entity was appointed to act as the new HDMI licensing agent with responsibility for licensing and the distribution of royalties among Founders. As a result of the amended model for sharing adopter fee revenue, we will be entitled to a reduced share of adopter fees paid by parties adopting the HDMI standard.

In addition, another member of the HDMI consortium asserts that we owe the other HDMI consortium founders their respective shares of any HDMI adopter fees not used by us in the marketing and other activities in furtherance of the HDMI standard from our time as agent. The consortium member has previously indicated its belief that the HDMI founders enjoy a right to these funds but has never pursued such claim. If a determination is made that there were excess adopter fees or if it is determined that we were obligated to share such fees with other consortium members, it could negatively impact our financial position. At this stage of the proceedings, we do not have an estimate of the likelihood or the amount of any financial consequences to us.

variability.

We share HDMI royalties with the other HDMI foundersFounders based on an allocation formula, which is reviewed generally every three years. The most recent royalty sharing formula coveredIn the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016, andfourth quarter of fiscal 2019, the HDMI Founders adopted a new agreement is yet to be signed. Ourcovering the five-year period beginning January 1, 2018. The HDMI Founders are currently negotiating a new agreement covering the next sharing period beginning January 1, 2023. The amount of our portion of the royalty allocation has declined for the last several years. In 2015, we received between 24% and 25% of the royalty allocation, while for 2016, we received 20% of the royalty allocation. The royalty allocation for 2017 and future years is not yet known but may decline. If the level continues to decline, our financial performance could be adversely affected. In addition, delays in the signing of new royalty sharing agreements impacted our timing of revenue recognition and ability to recognize revenue related todependent on the royalties in fiscal 2017. With our adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) as of the beginning of fiscal 2018, we will recognize revenue related to royalties based on estimates of the amounts we will be entitled to receive, and these estimates could differ materiality from actual royalty sharing amounts.


Through our wholly owned subsidiary, MHL, LLC, we act as agent of the MHL specification and are responsible for promoting and administering the specification. As agent, we are entitled to receive license fees paidgenerated by adopters of the MHL specification sufficient to reimburse us for the costs we incur to promote and administer the specification. Given the limited number of MHL adopters to date, we do not believe the license fees paid by such adopters will be sufficient to reimburse us for these costs and we make no assurance that the license fees paid by MHL adopters will ever be sufficient to reimburse us the costs we incur as agent of the specification.

We currently intend to promote and continue to be involved and actively participate in other standard setting initiatives. For example, through Silicon Image’s acquisition of SiBEAM, Inc. in May 2011, it achieved SiBEAM’s prior position as founder and chair of the WirelessHD Consortium. We may decide to license additional elements of our intellectual property to others for use in implementing, developing, promoting, or adopting standards in our target markets, in certain circumstances at little or no cost. This may make it easier for others to compete with us in such markets. In addition, even if we receive license fees or royalties in connection with the licensing of our intellectual property, we make no assurance that such license fees or royalties will compensate us adequately.


Our failure to control unauthorized access to our IT systems may cause problems with key business partners or liability.

We may be subject to unauthorized access to our IT systems through a security breach or cyber-attack. In the ordinary course of our business, we maintain sensitive data on our networks, including our intellectual property and proprietary or confidential business information relating to our business and that of our customers and business partners. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our business and reputation. We believe that companies have been increasingly subject to a wide variety of security incidents, cyber-attacks, and other attempts to gain unauthorized access. Cyber-attacks have become more prevalent and much harder to detect and defend against. Our network and storage applications may be subject to unauthorized access by hackers or breached due to operator error, malfeasance, or other system disruptions. It is often difficult to anticipate or immediately detect such incidents and to assess the damage caused by them. In the past, third parties have attempted to penetrate and/or infect our network and systems with malicious software in an effort to gain access to our network and systems.

These data breaches and any unauthorized access or disclosure of our information or intellectual property could compromise our intellectual property and expose sensitive business information. Cyber-attacks could also cause us to incur significant remediation costs, result in product development delays, disrupt key business operations, and divert attention of management and key information technology resources. Our reputation, brand, and business could be significantly harmed, and we could be subject to third party claims in the event of such a security breach.

Recent tax law changes and our global organizational structure and operations expose us to unanticipated tax consequences.

Our legal organizational structure could result in unanticipated unfavorable tax or other consequences which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We have a global tax structure to more effectively align our corporate structure with our business operations including responsibility for sales and purchasing activities. We created new and realigned existing legal entities; completed intercompanyadopter sales of rights to intellectual property, inventory, and fixed assets across different tax jurisdictions; and implemented cost-sharing and intellectual property licensing and royalty agreements between our legal entities. We currently operate legal entities in countries where we conduct supply-chain management, design, and sales operations around the world. In some countries, we maintain multiple entities for tax or other purposes. In addition, we are currently conducting further restructuring activities following our acquisition of Silicon Image as we integrate Silicon Image and its subsidiaries,royalty-bearing HDMI technology, which include numerous foreign entities, into our existing global tax and corporate structures. These integration activities, changes in tax laws, regulations, future jurisdictional profitability of the Company and its subsidiaries, and related regulatory interpretations in the countries in which we operate may impact the taxes we pay or tax provision we record, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are subject to taxationvariability in economic trends particularly in the United States, Singapore, and other countries. Future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the composition of earnings in countries with differing tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws. We compute our effective tax rate using actual jurisdictional profits and losses. Changes in the jurisdictional mix of profits and losses may cause fluctuations in the effective tax rate. Adverse changes in tax rates, our tax assets, and tax liabilities could negatively affect our results in the future.

We make no assurance as to what taxes we pay or the ability to estimate our future effective tax rate because of, among other things, uncertainty regarding the tax policies of the jurisdictions where we operate. In particular, we anticipate that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted December 22, 2017, will impact us. While we are able to quantify or estimate the effects of some of the provisions now in the act, we do not know of all of the rules the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") will enact to fully implement the tax law changes, or the IRS’ interpretations of the changes. We also continue to analyze and understand the changes and the impacts on us, including the indirect impacts that result from how our industry or we might modify behaviors in a response to the new tax law structure. We also provide no assurance that estimates we provide to quantify the effect of the changes may be accurate.

Product quality problems could lead to reduced revenue, gross margins, and net income.

In general, we warrant our productsmarket for varying lengths of time against non-conformance to our specifications and certain other defects. Because our products, including hardware, software, and intellectual property cores, are highly complex and increasingly incorporate advanced technology, our quality assurance programs may not detect all defects, whether manufacturing defects in individual products or systematic defects that could affect numerous shipments. Inability to detect a defect could result in a diversion of our engineering resources from product development efforts, increased engineering expenses to remediate the defect, and increased costs due to customer accommodation or inventory impairment charges. On occasion we have also repaired or replaced certain components, made software fixes, or refunded the purchase price or license fee paid by our customers due to product or software defects. If there are significant product defects, the costs to remediate such defects, net of reimbursed amounts from our vendors, if any, or to resolve warranty claims may adversely affect our revenue, gross margins, and net income.


We may have difficulty implementing the new revenue recognition requirements. 

Although we have spent considerable time preparing to implement new Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), we do not have extensive experience with the new requirements in practice. The SEC requires us to publish our financial results in short time frames, which could result in our having difficulty actually implementing the new requirements as intended within the proscribed financial reporting periods. We provide no assurance that our current estimates of the effects of ASU No. 2014-09 contained elsewhere in this Annual Report are accurate.

The nature of our business makes our revenue and gross margin subject to fluctuation and difficult to predict with accuracy, which could have an adverse impact on our business and our ability to provide forward-looking revenue and gross margin guidance.

In addition to the challenging market conditions we may face, we have limited visibility into the demand for our products, particularly new products, because demand for our products depends upon our products being designed into our end customers' products and those products achieving market acceptance. Due to the complexity of our customers' designs, the design to volume production process for many of our customers requires a substantial amount of time, frequently longer than a year. In addition, we are dependent upon "turns," orders received and turned for shipment in the same quarter. These factors make it difficult for us to accurately forecast future sales and project quarterly revenues. The difficulty in forecasting future sales weakens our ability to project our inventory requirements, which could result, and in the past has resulted, in inventory write-downs or failure to meet customer product demands in a timely manner. While we may give guidance, the difficulty in forecasting revenues as well as the relative customer and product mix of those revenues limits our ability to provide accurate forward-looking revenue and gross margin guidance.

Reductions in the average selling prices of our products could have a negative impact on our gross margins.

The average selling prices of our products generally decline as the products mature or may decline as we compete for market share or customer acceptance in competitive markets. We seek to offset the decrease in selling prices through yield improvement, manufacturing cost reductions, and increased unit sales. We also seek to continue to develop higher value products or product features that increase, or slow the decline of, the average selling price of our products. However, we cannot guarantee that our ongoing efforts will be successful or that they will keep pace with the decline in selling prices of our products, which could ultimately lead to a decline in revenues and have a negative effect on our gross margins.

consumer electronics.


If we are unable to adequately protect our new and existing intellectual property rights globally, our financial results and our ability to compete effectively may suffer.


Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology and we rely upon patent, copyright, trade secret, mask work, and trademark laws to protect our intellectual property.property globally. We intend to continue to protect our proprietary technology, however, we may be unsuccessful in asserting our intellectual property rights or such rights may be invalidated, violated, circumvented, or challenged. From time to time, third parties, including our competitors, have asserted against us patent, copyright, and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to us. Third parties may attempt to misappropriate our intellectual property through electronic or other means or assert infringement claims against us in the future. Such assertions by third parties may result in costly litigation, indemnity claims, or other legal actions, and we may not prevail in such matters or be able to license any valid and infringed patents from third parties on commercially reasonable terms. This could result in the loss of our ability to import and sell our products or require us to pay costly royalties to third parties in connection with sales of our products. Any infringement claim, indemnification claim, or impairment or loss of use of our intellectual property could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

13

Factors Related to Overall Business & Operations

Our business depends on the proper functioning of information technology systems. A material changefailure of these systems, data breaches, cyber-attacks, or cyber-fraud may cause business disruptions, compromise our intellectual property or other sensitive information, or result in losses.

We rely on various information technology ("IT") networks and systems to manage our operations, including financial reporting, and we regularly make changes to improve them as necessary by periodically implementing new, or upgrading or enhancing existing, operational and IT systems, procedures, and controls. These systems are supported by subcontractors, and they may also be subject to power and telecommunication outages or other general system failures. The legal, regulatory and contractual environments surrounding information security, data privacy, and data protection are complex and evolving. We continue to commit significant resources to implementing new systems to standardize our processes worldwide and to develop our capabilities in these areas. We are focused on realizing the full analytical functionality of these conversions, which can be extremely complex, in part, because of the wide range of legacy systems and processes that must be integrated.

In the normal course of business, we may implement new or updated IT systems and, as a result, we may experience delays or disruptions in the integration of these systems, or the related procedures or controls. The policies and security measures established with our IT systems may be vulnerable to security breaches and incidents, cyber-attacks, or fraud. We may also encounter errors in corruption or loss of data, an inability to accurately process or record transactions, and security or technical reliability issues. All of these could harm our ability to conduct core operating functions such as processing invoices, shipping and receiving, recording and reporting financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis, and could impact our internal control compliance efforts. If the technical solution or end user training are inadequate, it could limit our ability to manufacture and ship products as planned. Moreover, the proper functioning of the internal processes that the IT systems and networks support relies on qualified employees. Competition for qualified employees has generally increased across the economy in the United States, which, if we experience employee turnover, could lead to disruptions in our processes, inadequate end user training or difficulty updating our IT systems and networks.

We maintain sensitive data on our networks and on the networks of our business partners and third-party providers, including proprietary and confidential information relating to our intellectual property, personnel, and business, and that of our customers and third-party providers. Companies have been increasingly subject to a wide variety of security incidents, cyber-attacks, hacking, phishing, malware, ransomware, and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to systems or data, or to engage in fraudulent behavior. Cyber-attacks have become more prevalent, sophisticated and much harder to detect and defend against and it is often difficult to anticipate or detect such incidents on a timely basis and to assess the damage caused by them. In addition, our agreements governing encryption keyswith third-party providers, including but not limited to the liability limitations and insurance provisions contained in such agreements, may be inadequate to cover the liability, if any, associated with any security breaches. Increasing geopolitical tensions or conflicts have also created, and may continue to create, a heightened risk of cyberattacks. Our policies and security measures cannot guarantee security, and our information technology infrastructure, including our networks and systems, may be vulnerable to security breaches and incidents, cyber-attacks, or fraud. In the past, third parties have attempted to penetrate and/or infect our network and systems with malicious software and phishing attacks in an effort to gain access to our network and systems. In addition, we use could place additional restrictions on us,are subject to the risk of third parties falsifying invoices and similar fraud, frequently by obtaining unauthorized access to our vendors’ and business partners’ networks.

In some circumstances, we may partner with third-party providers and provide them with certain data, including sensitive data, or the ability to access or otherwise process such data. These third parties also face substantial security risks from a variety of sources. There can be no assurance that any security measures that we or our distributorsthird-party service providers have implemented will be effective against current or contract manufacturers,future security threats, and we cannot guarantee that our systems and networks or those of our third-party service providers have not been breached or otherwise compromised, or that they and any software in our or their supply chains do not contain bugs, vulnerabilities, or compromised code that could result in a breach of or disruption to our systems and networks or the systems and networks of third parties that support us and our services. If any of our third-party providers fails to adopt or adhere to adequate data security practices, or suffers a security breach or incident, any data, including sensitive data, that we provide them or that they otherwise may access or process for us may be improperly accessed, used, disclosed, modified, lost, destroyed, or rendered unavailable. Any security breaches or incidents that we or our third-party providers may suffer could compromise our intellectual property, expose sensitive business information and otherwise result in unauthorized access to or disclosure, modification, misuse, loss or destruction of sensitive information. We may need to expend significant financial and development resources to analyze, correct, eliminate, or work around errors or defects or to eliminate or otherwise address security vulnerabilities, and we and our third-party service providers may face difficulties or delays in identifying or otherwise responding to any potential security breach or incident.

Further, the increase in cyber-attacks has resulted in an increased focus on cybersecurity by certain government agencies. Any cyber-attack or other security breach or incident that we or our third-party providers may suffer, or the perception that any such attack, breach, or incident has occurred, could result in a loss of customer confidence in our security measures, damage to our brand, reputation, and market position, result in unauthorized access to or disclosure, modification, misuse, loss, corruption, unavailability, or destruction of our data or other sensitive data that we or our third-party providers process or maintain, disrupt normal business operations, require us to spend material resources to investigate or correct any breach or incident and to prevent future security breaches and incidents, expose us to legal claims and liabilities, including litigation, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, and indemnity obligations, and adversely affect our revenues and operating results. Further, any such actual or perceived breach or incident, and any claims, demands, litigation, or investigations or enforcement actions related to cybersecurity could cause us to incur significant remediation costs, result in product development delays, disrupt key business operations, and divert attention of management and key information technology resources. In addition, we may incur loss as a result of cyber-fraud, such as those experienced by other companies by making unauthorized payments irrespective of robust internal controls.

Failure or disruptions of our IT systems or difficulties or delays in maintaining, managing, and integrating them could adversely affect our controls and procedures and could impact our ability to perform necessary operations, which could restrict product shipmentmaterially adversely affect our business.

We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate for data security liabilities incurred and, will cover any indemnification claims against us relating to any incident, that insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or significantlyat all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our financial condition, operating results, and reputation.


Climate change may have a long-term impact on our business.

Climate-related risks are inherent wherever our business is conducted. Global climate change is causing, and is projected to continue to cause, an increase in the costfrequency and intensity of certain natural disasters and adverse weather, such as drought, wildfires, storms, sea-level rise, flooding, heat waves, and cold waves, occurring more frequently or with greater intensity. Such extreme events are driving changes in market dynamics, stakeholder expectations, and local, national and international climate change policies and regulations, any of which could result in disruptions to trackus, our suppliers, vendors, customers and logistics hubs, and may impact employees’ abilities to commute or to work from home effectively. These disruptions could make it more difficult and costly for us to deliver our products throughoutand services, obtain components or other supplies through our supply chain, maintain, or resume operations or perform other critical corporate functions, and could reduce customer demand for our products and services.

The increasing concern over climate change could also result in transition risks such as shifting customer preferences and increased regulatory requirements. Changing customer preferences may result in increased expectations regarding our solutions, products, and services, including the distribution chain.


Manyuse of thepackaging materials and other components in our products contain encryption keys used in connection with High Definition Content Protection (HDCP). The regulation and distribution of these encryption keys are controlled through license agreements with Digital Content Protection (DCP), a wholly owned subsidiary of Intel Corporation.their environmental impact. These license agreements have been modified by DCP from timeexpectations may cause us to time, and suchincur additional costs or make other changes could impact us,to our distributors, and our customers. An important element of both HDMI and MHL is the abilityoperations to implement link protection for high definition (HD), and more recently, 4K UltraHD, content. We implement various aspects of the HDCP link protection within certain parts we sell. We also, for the benefit of our customers, include the necessary HDCP encryption keys in parts we shiprespond to customers. These encryption keys are provided to us from DCP. We have a specific process for tracking and handling these encryption keys. If DCP changes any of the tracking or handling requirements associated with HDCP encryption keys, we may be required to change our manufacturing and distribution processes,them, which could adversely affect our manufacturing and distribution costs associated with these products.financial results. If we cannot satisfyfail to manage transition risks and customer expectations in an effective manner, customer demand for our solutions, products, and services could diminish, and our profitability could suffer. Concerns over climate change, as well as the adoption of new laws or regulations, may also impact market dynamics and may result in shifts in customer expectations, preferences, or requirements, which may require us to change our practices or incur increased costs or adversely impact customer demand for our products and services.

Additionally, concerns over climate change have resulted in, and are expected to continue to result in, the handlingadoption of legal and trackingregulatory requirements designed to address climate change, as well as legal and regulatory requirements requiring certain climate-related disclosures. Where new laws or regulations are more stringent than current legal or regulatory requirements, we may experience increased compliance burdens and costs to meet such obligations. Climate change also may reduce the availability or increase the cost of encryption keys,insurance for these negative impacts of natural disasters by contributing to an increase in the incidence and severity of such natural disasters. Ultimately, the impacts of climate change, whether involving physical risks (such as disruptions resulting from climate-related events or rising sea levels) or transition risks (such as regulatory changes, changes in market dynamics or increased operating costs, including the cost of insurance) are expected to be widespread and unpredictable and may materially adversely affect our business and financial results.

We regularly test for goodwill and other impairments as required under U.S. GAAP, and we may incur future impairments.

We are required under U.S. GAAP to test goodwill for possible impairment on an annual basis and to test goodwill and long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, for impairment at any other time that circumstances arise indicating the carrying value may not be recoverable.For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, the Company currently operates as one reporting unit: the core Lattice business, which includes intellectual property and semiconductor devices. There were no impairment charges to goodwill or amortizable intangible assets in fiscal years 2022, 2021, or 2020. There is no certainty that future impairment tests will indicate that goodwill or amortizable intangible assets will be deemed recoverable. As we continue to review our business operations and test for impairment or in connection with possible sales of assets, we may have impairment charges in the future, which may be material.

Changes to cease shipping or manufacturing certain products.



Our participation in consortia for the developmentfinancial accounting standards may affect our results of operations and promotion of industry standards in certain of our target markets, including the HDMI, MHL, and WirelessHD standards, requirescould cause us to license some of our intellectual property for free or under specified terms and conditions, which makes it easier for others to compete with us in such markets.

An element ofchange our business strategy includes participatingpractices.

We prepare our consolidated financial statements to conform to generally accepted accounting principles in consortiathe United States. These accounting principles are subject to establish industry standardsinterpretation by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC and various bodies formed to interpret and create accounting rules and regulations. Changes in certain of our target markets; promoting and enhancing specifications; and developing and marketing products based on those specificationsthese rules have occurred in the past and future enhancements. We intendchanges to continue participating in consortia that develop and promote the HDMI, MHL, and WirelessHD specifications. In connection with our participation in these consortia, we make certain commitments regarding our intellectual property, in each case with the effect of making certain of our intellectual property available to others, including our competitors, desiring to implement the specification in question. For example, we must license specific elements of our intellectual property to others for use in implementing the HDMI specification, including enhancements, as long as we remain part of the consortium. Also, we must agree not to assert certain necessary patent claims against other members of the MHL consortium, even if those members may have infringed upon those patents in implementing the MHL specification.


Accordingly, certain companies that implement these specifications in their products may use specific elements of our intellectual property to compete with us. Althoughrules, or in the case of the HDMI and MHL consortia, there are annual fees and royalties associated with the adopters’ use of the technology, we make no assurance that our shares of such annual fees and royalties will adequately compensate us for havingguidance relating to license or refrain from asserting our intellectual property. In September 2016, the Founders of the HDMI consortium, of which we are a member, amended the Founders Agreement resulting in changes to our role as agent for the HDMI consortium and to the model for sharing adopter fee revenues. Under the terms of the agreement, our role as the agent was terminated effective January 1, 2017 and a new independent entity was appointed to act as the new HDMI licensing agent with responsibility for licensing and the distribution of royalties among Founders. As a result of the amended model for sharing adopter fee revenue, we will be entitled to a reduced share of adopter fees paid by parties adopting the HDMI standard.

Our revenue depends, in part, on the continued adoption and widespread implementation of the HDMI and MHL specifications and the new implementationinterpretation and adoption of the WirelessHD specifications.

Our future revenue depends,rules, could have a material effect on our financial results and could affect portions of our business differently. Accounting standards also require us to make estimates and assumptions in part, uponconnection with the continued adoptionpreparation of our financial statements, and widespread implementationany changes to those estimates and assumptions could adversely affect our results of the HDMI, MHL,operations, cash flows and WirelessHD specifications. From timefinancial condition.

Changes in effective tax rates, tax laws and our global organizational structure and operations could expose us to time, competing standards have been established which negatively affect the success of existing standards or jeopardize the creation of new standards. Our failureunanticipated tax consequences.

We are subject to continue to drive innovationtaxation in the MHL specifications couldUnited States and other countries. Certain tax positions may remain open to examination for several years. Challenges by tax authorities to our previous tax positions and intercompany transfer pricing arrangements, and continuing assessments of our tax exposures may have an adverse effect on our provision for income taxes and cash tax liability. We have a global tax structure that aligns our corporate structure with our global business going forward.


MHL has not been widely adopted,operations, and if manufacturers who have included MHLwe currently operate legal entities in their designs decide that MHL is no longer necessary or cost-effective as a product feature, they couldmultiple countries. We may choose to omit the MHL functionality (and our product) from their designs. Such decisions would adversely affect our revenues.

We now have 60GHz wireless technology that we hope will be made widely available and adopted by the marketplace through the efforts of the WirelessHD consortium and incorporated intoconsolidate or integrate certain of these entities, and these integration activities, as well as changes in composition of our future products. Asearnings in jurisdictions with our HDMI and MHL products and intellectual property, our success with this technology will depend on our ability to introduce first-to-market WirelessHD-enabled semiconductor and intellectual property solutions to our customers and to continue to innovate within the WirelessHD standard. WiGig is an example of a competing 60GHz standard that has been created as an alternative high-bandwidth wireless connectivity solution for the personal computing industry. While the WiGig standard has not been in the market as long as the WirelessHD standard, it does represent a viable alternative to WirelessHD for 60GHz connectivity. If WiGig should gain broader adoption before WirelessHD is adopted, it could negativelydifferent tax rates, may impact the adoption of WirelessHD.

As successor-in-interest to Silicon Image,taxes we have granted Intel Corporation certain rights with respect to our intellectual property, which could allow Intel to develop products that compete with ourspay or otherwise reduce the value of our intellectual property.

Silicon Image entered into a patent cross-license agreement with Intel in which each of them granted the other a license to use the patents filed by the grantor prior to a specified date, except for use related to identified types of products. We believe that the scope of this license to Intel excludes our current products and anticipated future products. Intel could, however, exercise its rights under this agreement to use certain of our patents received in the acquisition of Silicon Image to develop and market other products that compete with ours, without payment to us. Additionally, Intel’s rights to these patents could reduce the value of the patents to any third-party who otherwise might be interested in acquiring rights to use these patents in such products. Finally, Intel could endorse competing products, including a competing digital interface, or develop its own proprietary digital interface. Any of these actions could substantially harm our business and results of operations.


Litigation and unfavorable results of legal proceedings could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

From time to timetax provision we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise out of the ordinary conduct of our business. Certain claims are not yet resolved, including those that are discussed under Note 15 contained in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and additional claims may arise in the future. Results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Regardless of merit, litigation may be both time-consuming and disruptive to our operations and cause significant expense and diversion of management attention and we may enter into material settlements to avoid these risks. Should we fail to prevail in certain matters, we may be faced with significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us that could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results and certain portions of our business.

We depend upon a third party to provide inventory management, order fulfillment, and direct sales logistics and disruption of these services could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We rely on a third party vendor to provide cost-effective and efficient supply chain services. Among other activities, these outsourced services relate to direct sales logistics, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing, and distribution of inventory to third party distributors. If our third party supply chain provider were to discontinue services for us or its operations are disrupted as a result of a fire, earthquake, act of terrorism, political unrest, governmental uncertainty, war, disease, or other natural disaster or catastrophic event, or any other reason, our ability to fulfill direct sales orders and distribute inventory timely, cost effectively, or at all, would be hindered,record, which could adversely affect our business.

results of operations. Furthermore, various levels of government are focused on tax reform and other legislative actions to increase tax revenue.

We also may be impacted by changes in the tax laws of the United States and foreign jurisdictions. President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) on August 16, 2022 and the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 on August 9, 2022. These laws implement new tax provisions, including a 1% excise tax on certain stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations after December 31, 2022, and provide for various incentives and tax credits. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents a coalition of member countries, recommended changes to numerous long-standing tax principles, including a 15% global minimum tax. If implemented by taxing authorities, such changes, as well as changes in taxing jurisdictions’ administrative interpretations, decisions, policies, and positions, could have faileda material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and business processes could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We are required to maintain internal controls over financial reporting. We review these controls regularly and deficiencies may be identified from time to time. In the future, we may identify material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely, which could adversely affect our business, financial results, and stock price.

We must also maintain high quality business processes. We rely on our business processes to, among other things, coordinate with our suppliers, manage our supply chain efficiently, manufacture high quality products and comply with various laws and regulations. Any failure to maintain high quality business processes, or to effectively adjust our business processes to changing circumstances and needs, could limit our ability to meet our business’ needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial results, and stock price.

We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of, or inability to attract, such personnel could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively.

We depend on the efforts and abilities of certain key members of management and other technical personnel. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to retain such personnel and attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, particularly product engineers who can respond to market demands and required product innovation. Competition for such personnel is intense and has been increasing generally throughout the economy, and we may not be successful in hiring or retaining new or existing qualified personnel. If we lose existing qualified personnel or are unable to hire new qualified personnel, as needed, we could have difficulty competing in our highly competitive and innovative environment.

Our insurance may not adequately insure againstcover certain risks and, as a result, our financial condition and results may be adversely affected.


We carry insurance customary for companies in our industry, including, but not limited to, liability, property, and casualty; workers' compensation; cyber liability; and business interruption insurance. We also insure our employees for basic medical expenses. In addition, we have insurance contracts that provide director and officer liability coverage for our directors and officers. Other than the specific areas mentioned above, we are self-insured with respect to most other risks and exposures, and the insurance we carry in many cases is subject to a significant policy deductible or other limitation before coverage applies. Based on management's assessment and judgment, we have determined that it is more cost effective to self-insure against certain risks than to incur the insurance premium costs. The risks and exposures for which we self-insure include, but are not limited to, certain natural disasters, certain product defects, certain matters for which we indemnify third parties, political risk, certain theft, patent infringement, and employment practice matters. Should there be a catastrophic loss due to an uninsured event (such as an earthquake) or a loss due to adverse occurrences in any area in which we are self-insured, our financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected.


Our outstanding indebtedness could reduce our strategic flexibility and liquidity and may have other adverse effects on our results of operations.

As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately $130 million outstanding in revolving loans under an amended and restated credit agreement, dated September 1, 2022 (the “2022 Credit Agreement”). Our obligations under the 2022 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries meeting materiality thresholds set forth in the 2022 Credit Agreement, and the revolving loans under the 2022 Credit Agreement may be repaid and reborrowed at our discretion, with any remaining outstanding principal amount due and payable on the maturity date of the revolving loan facility on September 1, 2027. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations depends upon our operating and financial performance, which is subject to general economic and competitive conditions and to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to service our debt, we may need to sell material assets, restructure or refinance our debt, or seek additional equity capital. Prevailing economic conditions and global credit markets could adversely impact our ability to sell material assets, restructure or refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or we may not be able to restructure or refinance our debt without incurring significant additional fees and expenses.

The 2022 Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants limiting the ability of the Company and our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, grant liens, undergo certain fundamental changes, make investments, make certain restricted payments, dispose of assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter into burdensome agreements, in each case, subject to limitations and exceptions set forth in the 2022 Credit Agreement. We competeare also required to maintain compliance with othersa total net leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio, in each case, determined in accordance with the terms of the 2022 Credit Agreement. 

The amount and terms of our indebtedness, as well as our credit rating, could have important consequences, including the following:

we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, less able to withstand competitive pressures, and less flexible in responding to changing business and economic conditions;

our cash flow from operations may be allocated to the payment of outstanding indebtedness, and not to research and development, operations or business growth;

we might not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or other sources to enable us to meet our payment obligations under the facility and to fund other liquidity needs;

our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in a sale or liquidation may be limited until any balance on the facility is repaid in full; and

our ability to incur additional debt, including for working capital, acquisitions, or other needs, is more limited.

If we breach a loan covenant, the lenders could accelerate the repayment of the facility. We might not have sufficient assets to attractrepay our indebtedness upon acceleration. If we are unable to repay or refinance the indebtedness upon acceleration or at maturity, the lenders could initiate a bankruptcy proceeding against us or collection proceedings with respect to our assets and retain key personnel,subsidiaries securing the facility, which could materially decrease the value of our common stock.

Factors Related to Our Markets and Product Development

The semiconductor industry routinely experiences cyclical market patterns and our products are used across different end markets. A significant downturn in the industry or in any loss of these end markets could cause a meaningful reduction in demand for our products and adversely affect our operating results.

Our revenue and gross margin can fluctuate significantly due to downturns in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry. These downturns can be severe and prolonged and can result in price erosion and weak demand for our products. Weak demand for our products resulting from general economic conditions affecting the end markets we serve, or inabilitythe semiconductor industry specifically, and reduced spending by our customers can result, and in the past has resulted, in diminished product demand, high inventory levels, erosion of average selling prices, excess and obsolete inventories and corresponding inventory write-downs. Our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations of future sales. Many of our expenses, particularly those relating to attract, such personnelfacilities, capital equipment, and other overhead, are relatively fixed. We might be unable to reduce spending quickly enough to compensate for reductions in sales. Accordingly, shortfalls in sales could adversely affect our operating results. Furthermore, any significant upturn in the semiconductor industry could result in increased competition for access to raw materials and third-party service providers.

Additionally, our products are used across different end markets, and demand for our products is difficult to predict and may vary within or among our Industrial and Automotive, Communications and Computing, and Consumer end markets. Our target markets may not grow or develop as we currently expect, and demand may increase or change in one or more of our end markets, and changes in demand may reduce our revenue, lower our gross margin and effect our operating results. We have experienced concentrations of revenue at certain customers and within certain end markets, and we regularly compete for design opportunities at these customers and within these markets. Any deterioration in these end markets, reductions in the magnitude of revenue streams, our inability to meet design and pricing requirements, or volatility in demand for our products could lead to a reduction in our revenue and adversely affect our operating results. Our success in our end markets depends on many factors, including the strength or financial performance of the customers in our end markets, our ability to timely meet rapidly changing product requirements, market needs, and our ability to maintain design wins across different markets and customers to dampen the effects of market volatility. The dynamics of the markets in which we operate make prediction of and timely reaction to such events difficult.

Due to these and other factors, our past results may not be reliable predictors of our future results. If we are unable to accomplish any of the foregoing, or to offset the volatility of cyclical changes in the semiconductor industry or our end markets through diversification into other markets, these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Our success and future revenue depend on our ability to develop and introduce new products that achieve customer and market acceptance.

We compete effectively.in a dynamic environment characterized by rapid technology and product evolution, generally followed by a relatively longer process of ramping up to volume production on advanced technologies. Our end customers’ continued use of our products is frequently reevaluated, as certain of our customers' product life cycles are relatively short and they continually develop new products. The selection process for our products to be included in our customers' new products is highly competitive. There are no guarantees that our products will be included in the next generation of products introduced by these customers. Additionally, our markets are also characterized by evolving industry standards and increased demand for higher levels of integration and smaller process geometry. Our competitive position and success depend on our ability to innovate, develop, and introduce new products that compete effectively on the basis of price, density, functionality, power consumption, form factor, and performance, and our addressing the evolving needs of the markets we serve, among other things. With increased introduction of new products, we expect revenue related to mature products to decline over time in a normal product life cycle. As a result, we may be increasingly dependent on revenue derived from our newer products.

Our future growth and the success of new product introductions depend upon numerous factors, including:

timely completion and introduction of new product designs;

ability to generate new design opportunities and design wins, including those which result in sales of significant volume;

achievement of necessary volume of production to achieve acceptable cost;

availability of specialized field application engineering resources supporting demand creation and customer adoption of new products;

ability to utilize advanced manufacturing process technologies;

achieving acceptable yields and obtaining adequate production capacity from our wafer foundries and assembly and test subcontractors;

ability to obtain advanced packaging;

availability of supporting software design tools;

utilization of predefined IP logic;

customer acceptance of advanced features in our new products; and

market acceptance of our customers' products.

The failure of any of these factors, among others, could adversely affect our product innovation, development and introduction efforts and our financial condition and results of operations.

18

We compete against companies that have significantly greater resources than us and numerous other product solutions.

The semiconductor industry is highly competitive and many of our direct and indirect competitors have substantially greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing, and sales resources than us. Consolidation in our industry may increasingly mean that our competitors have greater consolidated resources, or other synergies, including the ability to attract qualified employee or incorporate higher costs into product and service prices, that could put us at a competitive disadvantage. We currently compete directly with companies that have licensed our technology or have developed similar products, as well as numerous semiconductor companies that offer products based on alternative solutions, such as applications processor, application specific standard product, microcontroller, analog, and digital signal processing technologies. Competition from these semiconductor companies may intensify as we offer more products in any of our end markets. These competitors include established, multinational semiconductor companies, as well as emerging companies.

We depend on independent contractors and third parties to provide key services in our product development and operations, and any disruption of their services, or an increase in cost of these services, could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on subcontractors to provide cost effective and efficient services in our product development and supply chain functions, including test and assembly services, software and hardware development, support of intellectual property cores, inventory management, order fulfillment and direct sales logistics.

Our operations and operating results may be adversely affected if we experience problems with our subcontractors that impact the effortsdelivery of product to our customers. These problems may include: schedule delays or defects in software or hardware development deliverables; prolonged inability to obtain wafers or packaging materials with competitive performance and abilitiescost attributes; inability to achieve adequate yields or timely delivery; inability to meet customer timelines or demands; disruption or defects in assembly, test, or shipping services; or delays in stabilizing manufacturing processes or ramping up volume for new products. If our third-party supply chain providers were to reduce or discontinue services for us or their operations are disrupted as a result of a fire, earthquake, act of terrorism, political unrest, governmental uncertainty, war, disease, or other natural disaster or catastrophic event, weak economic conditions, inflation, recession, labor market disruptions, or any other reason, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Factors Related to Our Sales and Revenue

Our revenues depend on our relationships with our distributors and on a concentrated group of end customers. An adverse change in the relationships with, or performance of, our distributors, or any reduction in the use of our products by our end customers, could harm our sales and significantly decrease our revenue.

We depend on a concentrated group of distributors to sell our products to end customers, complete order fulfillment, maintain sufficient inventory of our products and provide services to our end customers. In fiscal 2022, revenue attributable to sales to distributors accounted for 89% of our total revenue, with two distributors accounting for 59% of total revenue. We have significant outstanding receivables with our top distributors, and expect our distributors to generate a significant portion of our revenue in the future. Any adverse change to our relationships or agreements with our distributors, a failure by one or more of our distributors to perform its obligations to us, or consolidation in the distribution industry could have a material impact on our business, including a reduction in our access to certain key members of management and other technical personnel. Our future success depends, in part, uponend customers, or our ability to retainsell our products.

If our relationships with any material customers were to diminish, if these customers were to develop their own solutions or adopt alternative solutions or competitors' solutions, if any one or more of our concentrated groups of customers were to experience significantly adverse financial conditions, including as a result of inflation, economic slowdown or recession, or labor market disruptions, or if as a result of trade disputes or sanctions these customers were restricted from purchasing our products, our results could be adversely affected.

In addition, the inability of customers to obtain credit, the insolvency of one or more customers, or tariffs applicable to our customers’ products, could impact our sales. Any of these effects could impact our ability to effectively manage inventory levels and collect receivables, require additional restructuring actions, and decrease our revenue and profitability.

The nature of our business and length of our sales cycle makes our revenue, gross margin, net income, and inventory subject to fluctuation and difficult to accurately predict.

A number of factors, including how products are manufactured to support end markets, yield, wafer pricing, cost of packaging raw materials, product mix, market acceptance of our new products, competitive pricing dynamics, product quality, geographic and/or end market mix, and pricing strategies, can cause our revenue, gross margins, net income, and inventory to fluctuate significantly either positively or negatively from period to period.

We have limited visibility into the demand for our products, particularly new products, because demand for our products depends upon our products being designed into our end customers' products and those products achieving market acceptance. During our sales cycle, our customers typically test and evaluate our products prior to deciding to include our products into the design of their own products, and then require additional time to begin volume production of their products. This lengthy sales cycle may cause us to incur significant expenses, which could be exacerbated by rising inflation, experience significant production delays and to incur additional inventory costs before we receive a customer order that may be delayed or never get placed. A key strategic customer may demand certain design or production resources to meet their requirements or work on a specific solution, which could cause delays in our normal development schedule and result in significant investment of our resources or missed opportunities with other potential customers. We may incur these expenses without generating revenue from our products to offset the expenses.

While our sales cycles are typically long, our average product life cycles can be short as a result of the rapidly changing technology environment in which we operate. From time to time, our inventory levels may be higher than historical norms due to inventory build decisions aimed at meeting expected demand, ramping for new products, reducing direct material cost, or enabling responsiveness to expected demand. In the event the expected demand does not materialize, or if our short sales cycle does not generate sufficient revenue, we may be subject to incremental excess and obsolescence costs.

These factors make it difficult for us to accurately forecast future sales and project quarterly revenues. The difficulty in forecasting future sales weakens our ability to project our inventory requirements, which could result, and in the past has resulted, in inventory write-downs or failure to meet customer product demands in a timely manner. While we may issue guidance, difficulty in forecasting financial performance, relative customer and product mix, and the unpredictability of unknown variables and their impact on our financial performance may impair the accuracy of our forward-looking financial measures.

Accounting requirements related to sales through our distribution channel could result in our reporting revenue in excess of demand.

Revenue recognition standards require recognition of revenue based on estimates and may require us to record revenue from distributors that is in excess of actual end customer demand. Since we have limited ability to forecast inventory levels of our end customers, we depend on the timeliness and accuracy of resale reports from our distributors. Late or inaccurate resale reports could mask significant build-up of inventories in our distribution channel, have a detrimental effect on our ability to properly recognize revenue, and impact our ability to forecast future sales. An inventory build-up in our distribution channel could result in a slowdown in orders, requests for returns from customers, or requests to move out planned shipments. If our distributors do not ultimately sell the inventory and our estimates change, we could be required to materially correct our recognized revenue in a future period, depending on actual results. Any failure to manage these challenges could disrupt or reduce sales of our products and unfavorably impact our financial results.

General Risk Factors

Our operations are subject to the effects of inflationary pressures and recessionary concerns.

Global economic conditions have recently experienced historically high levels of inflation, and there is increasing concern about the potential for recession. Recent inflation is primarily believed to be the result of the economic impacts from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including the global supply chain disruptions, strong economic recovery and associated widespread demand for goods, and government stimulus packages, among other factors. For instance, global supply chain disruptions have resulted in shortages in materials and services. Such shortages have resulted in inflationary cost increases for labor, materials, and services across the economy, and could continue to cause costs to increase as well as scarcity of certain products. If the inflation rate continues to increase, it will affect our expenses. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects on the market, including the possibility of recession, it may adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.


Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue, cash flows, and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Our worldwide operations and supply chain could be disrupted by natural or human-induced disasters including, but not limited to, earthquakes, tsunamis, or floods; hurricanes, cyclones, or typhoons; fires, or other extreme weather conditions; power or water shortages; telecommunications failures; materials scarcity and price volatility; manufacturing equipment failures; IT system failures; cybersecurity attacks; data breaches; medical epidemics or pandemics (such as COVID-19); terrorist acts, civil unrest, military actions, conflicts, or wars; or other natural or man-made disasters or catastrophic events.

The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could adversely affect our competitive position and result in significant losses, decrease demand for our products, seriously harm our revenue, profitability and financial condition, increase our costs and expenses, make it difficult or impossible to provide services or deliver products to our customers or to receive components from our suppliers, create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain, result in the need to impose employee travel restrictions, and require substantial expenditures and recovery time in order to fully resume operations. The impacts and frequency of any of the above could furthermore be exacerbated by climate change, particularly in countries where we, or our suppliers or customers, operate that have limited infrastructure and disaster recovery resources.

Our operations and those of our significant suppliers and distributors could be adversely affected if manufacturing, logistics, or other operations in key locations, including logistics hubs in Asia, are disrupted for any reason, such personnelas those described above or other economic, business, labor, environmental, public health, regulatory or political reasons. In addition, even if our operations are unaffected or recover quickly, if our customers cannot timely resume their own operations due to a catastrophic event, they may reduce or cancel their orders, or these events could otherwise result in a decrease in demand for our products. Although it is impossible to completely predict the occurrences or consequences of any such events, forecasting disruptive events and attractbuilding additional resiliency into our operations accordingly will become an increasing business imperative.

The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to volatility in response to a variety of factors.

Our common stock has experienced substantial price volatility in the past and may continue to do so in the future. Additionally, the technology industry and the stock market as a whole has experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of particular companies. The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate widely due to various factors, including, but not limited to, actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition and operating results; changes in financial estimates by us or financial or other market estimates and ratings by securities and other analysts; our ability to develop new products, enter new market segments, gain market share, manage cyber-security and litigation risk, diversify our customer base, and successfully secure manufacturing capacity; news regarding our products or products of our competitors; any mergers, acquisitions or divestitures of assets undertaken by us; inflationary conditions, interest rate changes, and recessionary concerns; regulatory changes to international trade policies, economic sanctions, or export controls, such as new licensing requirements for exporting certain chip-related technology to China; terrorist acts or acts of war, including the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia; epidemics and pandemics, such as developments and restrictions with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic; trading activity in our common stock, including stock repurchases, actions by institutional or other large stockholders, or our inclusion in market indices; or general economic, industry, and market conditions worldwide.

The volatility of our stock may cause the value of a stockholder’s investment to change rapidly. Investors in our common stock may not realize any return on their investment in us and may lose some or all of their investment. Additionally, if our stock price declines, it may be more difficult for us to raise capital and may have other adverse effects on our business. Stock price fluctuations could impact the value of our equity compensation, which could affect our ability to recruit and retain other highly qualified personnel, particularly product engineers whoemployees. Volatility in the trading price of our common stock could also result in the filing of securities class action litigation matters, which could result in substantial costs and the diversion of management time and resources. For these reasons, investors should not rely on recent or historical trends to predict future trading prices of our common stock, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Acquisitions, divestitures, strategic investments and strategic partnerships could disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We may pursue growth opportunities by acquiring complementary businesses, solutions or technologies through strategic transactions, investments or partnerships. The identification of suitable acquisition, strategic investment or strategic partnership candidates can respondbe costly and time consuming and can distract our management team from our current operations. If such strategic transactions require us to market demands and required product innovation. Competition for such personnel is intense andseek additional debt or equity financing, we may not be successfulable to obtain such financing on terms favorable to us or at all, and such transaction may adversely affect our liquidity and capital structure. We may also choose to divest certain non-core assets, which divestitures could lead to charges against earnings and may expose us to additional liabilities and risks. Any strategic transaction might not strengthen our competitive position, may increase some of our risks, and may be viewed negatively by our customers, partners or investors. Even if we successfully complete a strategic transaction, we may not be able to effectively integrate the acquired business, technology, systems, control environment, solutions, personnel or operations into our business or global tax structure. We may experience unexpected changes in hiringhow we are required to account for strategic transactions pursuant to U.S. GAAP and may not achieve the anticipated benefits of any strategic transaction. We may incur unexpected costs, claims or retaining newliabilities that we incur during the strategic transaction or existing qualified personnel. From time to timethat we assume from the acquired company, or we may discover adverse conditions post acquisition for which we have effected restructurings which have eliminated a numberlimited or no recourse.

21


None.


Item 2. Properties


Our corporate headquarters and executive office are in a 23,680 square foot of space leased in Portland, Oregon through March 2025.

We also leasedlease a 47,800 square foot of space in Hillsboro, Oregon as our corporate headquarters and a research and development facility through November 2022. We also currently lease aOctober 2028.

In San Jose, California, we have 98,874 square footfeet under lease through September 2026, of which we use 49,579 square feet as a research and development facilityfacility. We vacated 49,295 square feet during the fourth quarter of 2018. During 2019, we vacated a 23,680 square foot office space in San Jose, CaliforniaPortland, Oregon, which we have subleased through September 2026.the end of the lease in March 2025.


In Muntinlupa City, Philippines, we lease a total of 48,56550,503 square feet through May 2025 and 1,938 square feet through June 2025 for research and development and operations facilities. In this location, we also lease another 2,856 square feet through April 2018.


The March 2015 acquisition of Silicon Image added 128,154, 66,385 and 22,507 square feet of leased spaces in Sunnyvale, California, Shanghai, China and Hyderabad, India through June 2018, May 2018 and December 2017, respectively. We terminated the Sunnyvale lease in February 2017 and the Hyderabad lease in September 2017.

In Shanghai, China, we leased space for 3,212 square feet, prior to the acquisition of Silicon Image, which we terminated in November 2015. We also owned an 18,869 square foot research and development facility in Shanghai, China, which we sold in August 2017. In this location, we also lease another 66,36168,027 square feet through May 2018.

2024 for research and development operations. We also lease office facilities in multiple other metropolitan locations for our domestic and international sales staff. We believe that our existing facilities are suitable and adequate for our current and foreseeable future needs.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time

The information contained under the heading "Legal Matters" in Note 15 - Contingencies to time, we are exposed to certain assertedour Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3. Also, see “Litigation and unasserted potential claims. Periodically, we review the statusunfavorable results of each significant matterlegal proceedings could adversely affect our financial condition and assess its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and a rangeoperating results” in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of possible losses can be estimated, we then accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. BecausePart I of such uncertainties, accruals are based onlythis Annual Report on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to pending claims and litigation and may revise estimates.


Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.



Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "LSCC". The following table sets forth the low and high intraday sale prices for our common stock for the last two fiscal years, as reported by NASDAQ.

 Low High
2017:   
First Quarter$6.76
 $7.55
Second Quarter6.51
 7.10
Third Quarter5.05
 7.03
Fourth Quarter5.14
 6.60
2016:   
First Quarter$4.02
 $6.67
Second Quarter4.89
 6.47
Third Quarter5.21
 6.69
Fourth Quarter5.91
 7.99

Holders


As of March 2, 2018,February 13, 2023, we had approximately 240177 stockholders of record.


Dividends


The payment of dividends on our common stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We intend to retain earnings to finance our business. We have never paid cash dividends.


Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


None.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On August 8, 2022, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which up to $150 million of outstanding common stock could be repurchased from time to time (the "2023 Repurchase Program"). The duration of the 2023 Repurchase Program is through the end of December 2023. Under the 2023 Repurchase Program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, we repurchased 288,652 shares for $20.0 million, or an average price paid per share of $69.27. All repurchases were open market transactions funded from available working capital. All shares repurchased pursuant to the 2023 Repurchase Programs were retired by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022. We have repurchased a total of 1,951,934 shares for $110.1 million, or an average price paid per share of $56.42, during fiscal year 2022.

The following table contains information regarding our repurchases of our common stock that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022:

Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

  

Average Price Paid per Share

  

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (a)

  

Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ($M) (b)

 

October 2, 2022 through October 29, 2022

    $     $149.7 

October 30, 2022 through November 26, 2022

    $     $149.7 

November 27, 2022 through December 31, 2022

  288,652  $69.27   288,652  $129.7 

Total

  288,652  $69.27   288,652  $129.7 

(a)All repurchases during the quarter were open-market transactions funded from available working capital made under the authorization from our Board of Directors to purchase up to $150.0 million of our common stock announced August 8, 2022
(b)As of December 31, 2022 this amount consisted of the remaining portion of the $150.0 million program authorized through the end of December 2023 that was announced August 8, 2022.

23


None.

Comparison of Total Cumulative Stockholder Return


The following graph shows the five-year comparison of cumulative stockholder return on our common stock, the Standard and Poor's (“S&P”) 500 Index and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (“PHLX”) from December 20122017 through December 2017.2022. Cumulative stockholder return assumes $100 invested at the beginning of the period in our common stock, the S&P and PHLX. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.


Lattice Cumulative Stockholder Return

totalreturngraph2022b.jpg


Item 6. SelectedReserved

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Data

 Year Ended *
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 
January 2,
2016 **
 January 3,
2015
 December 28,
2013
(In thousands, except per share data)    
Revenue:         
Product$356,502
 $390,704
 $369,200
 $366,127
 $332,525
Licensing and services29,459
 36,350
 36,766
 
 
Total Revenue385,961
 427,054
 405,966
 366,127
 332,525
Costs and expenses:         
Cost of product revenue164,657
 179,983
 184,914
 159,940
 154,281
Cost of licensing and services revenue4,725
 637
 1,143
 
 
Research and development103,357
 117,518
 136,868
 88,079
 80,966
Selling, general, and administrative90,718
 98,602
 97,349
 73,527
 67,144
Amortization of acquired intangible assets31,340
 33,575
 29,580
 2,948
 2,960
Restructuring charges7,196
 9,267
 19,239
 17
 388
Acquisition related charges3,781
 6,305
 22,450
 
 
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets32,431
 7,866
 21,655
 
 
Gain on sale of building(4,624) 
 
 
 
Total costs and expenses433,581
 453,753
 513,198
 324,511
 305,739
(Loss) Income from operations(47,620) (26,699) (107,232) 41,616
 26,786
Interest expense(18,807) (20,327) (18,389) (172) (152)
Other (expense) income, net ***(3,286) 2,844
 (1,072) 1,497
 (148)
(Loss) income before income taxes(69,713) (44,182) (126,693) 42,941
 26,486
Income tax expense (benefit)849
 9,917
 32,540
 (5,639) 4,165
Net (loss) income$(70,562) $(54,099) $(159,233) $48,580
 $22,321
          
Net (loss) income per share:         
Basic$(0.58) $(0.45) $(1.36) $0.41
 $0.19
Diluted$(0.58) $(0.45) $(1.36) $0.40
 $0.19
          
Shares used in per share calculations:         
Basic122,677
 119,994
 117,387
 117,708
 115,701
Diluted122,677
 119,994
 117,387
 120,245
 117,081
          
  
BALANCE SHEET:December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
 January 3,
2015
 December 28,
2013
(In thousands)    
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities$111,797
 $116,860
 $102,574
 $254,844
 $215,815
Total assets$635,961
 $766,883
 $785,920
 $510,530
 $447,876
Long term liabilities$334,621
 $338,903
 $369,223
 $8,809
 $3,588
Total liabilities$418,268
 $496,453
 $480,400
 $69,555
 $62,196
Total stockholders' equity$217,693
 $270,430
 $305,520
 $440,975
 $385,680
          
* The year ended January 3, 2015 was a 53-week year as compared to the other years presented, which were based on our standard 52-week year.
** Our results for the year ended January 2, 2016 include the results associated with the acquisition of Silicon Image for the approximately 10-month period from
     March 11, 2015 through January 2, 2016. Results presented for periods prior to fiscal 2015 are those historically reported for Lattice only.
*** Equity in net loss of an unconsolidated affiliate previously presented separately is now included in Other (expense) income, net for all periods presented.
     (see "Reclassifications" in Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8).

ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Condition and Results of Operations

Overview


Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Lattice,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) develops semiconductordevelop technologies that we monetize through differentiated programmable logic semiconductor products, silicon-enabling products, system solutions, design services, and licenses. Lattice is the low power programmable leader. We engagesolve customer problems across the network, from the Edge to the Cloud, in smart connectivity solutions, providing intellectual property ("IP")the growing communications, computing, industrial, automotive, and low-power, small form-factor devices that enable globalconsumer markets. Our technology, long-standing relationships, and commitment to world-class support lets our customers to quickly and easily develop innovative,unleash their innovation to create a smart, secure, and connected products.world.

Lattice has focused its strategy on delivering programmable logic products and related solutions based on low power, small size, and ease of use. We help their products become more aware, interact more intelligently, and make better and faster connections. In an increasingly intense global technology market, we helpalso serve our customers get theirwith IP licensing and various other services. Our product development activities include new proprietary products, advanced packaging, existing product enhancements, software development tools, soft IP, and system solutions for high-growth applications such as Edge AI, 5G infrastructure, platform security, and factory automation.

This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report. Discussions of results for prior periods (fiscal 2021 compared to fiscal 2020) are incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2022.

Impact of COVID-19 and Global Economic Environment on our Business


The COVID-19 pandemic, increased financial
market faster than their competitors. Our broad end-market exposure extends from mobile devicesvolatility, inflationary pressure, rising interest rates, recessionary concerns, and consumer electronicsgeopolitical tension continue to industrialimpact business globally and automotive equipment, communicationsmay impact our operations by causing disruption to our labor markets and computing infrastructure, and licensing.


Lattice was founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Portland, Oregon. We acquired Silicon Image, Inc. ("Silicon Image") in March 2015. Silicon Image was engaged in setting industry standardssupply chains. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including the HDMI®, DVI®, MHL®periodic resurgence of cases relating to the spread of new variants, has and WirelessHD® standards.

Plan of Mergercontinues to impact worldwide economic activity and Reorganization Terminated

On November 3, 2016, we entered into an Agreementposes the risk that our employees, contractors, suppliers and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Canyon Bridge Acquisition Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”),other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic, increased financial market volatility, inflationary pressures and Canyon Bridge Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporationrelated uncertainty will impact our business activities will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.

The closing of the Merger was subject to certain closing conditions. These closing conditions included clearance by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended. On September 13, 2017, the President of the United States issued an order (the “Order”) prohibiting the Merger. As a result of the issuance of the Order, clearance by CFIUS was not obtained, the Merger cannot be consummated,predicted at this time. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report for further information about related risks and we have terminated the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. Neither the Company nor Parent will incur any termination fees in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement.

uncertainties.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates


Critical accounting policies are those that are both most important to the portrayal of a company's financial condition and results of operations, and that require management's most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments affecting the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, knowledge of current conditions, and our beliefs of what could occur in the future considering available information. While we believe that our estimates, assumptions, and judgments are reasonable, they are based on information available when made, and because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis.

We believe the following accounting policies and the related estimates are critical in the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require management's most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments. See "NoteNote 1 - Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies" underPolicies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further information on the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.


Revenue Recognitionfrom Contracts with Customers

We recognize revenue upon satisfaction of performance obligations when control of promised goods or services has been transferred to our customers. We measure revenue based on the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for products or services. For revenue recognized on both sales to distributors and related to HDMI and other royalties, the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to receive is based on estimates that require assumptions and judgments relating to trends in recent and historical activity. See Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further information on our recognition of revenue. Sales to most distributors are made under terms allowing certain price adjustments upon sale to their end customers and limited rights of return of our products held in their inventory. The revenue recognized based on estimated price adjustments and stock rotation reserves may be materially different from the actual consideration received if the actual distributor price adjustments and stock rotation returns differ significantly from the historical trends used in the estimates.

Inventories and Cost of Revenue

Inventories are stated at the lower of actual cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. We review and set standard costs quarterly to approximate current actual manufacturing costs. Our manufacturing overhead standards for product costs are calculated assuming full absorption of actual spending over actual costs. The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate excess or obsolete inventory. Material assumptions we use to estimate necessary inventory carrying value adjustments can be unique to each product and are based on specific facts and circumstances. In determining provisions for excess or obsolete products, we consider assumptions such as changes in business and economic conditions, projected customer demand for our products, and changes in technology or customer requirements. The creation of such provisions results in a write-down of inventory to net realizable value and a charge to Cost of revenue. If in any period we anticipate a change in assumptions such as future market or economic conditions to be less favorable than our previous estimates, additional inventory write-downs may be required and would be reflected in Cost of revenue, resulting in a negative impact to our gross margin in that period. If in any period we are able to sell inventories that had been written down to a level below the ultimate realized selling price in a previous period, related revenue would be recorded with a lower or no offsetting charge to Cost of revenue resulting in a net benefit to our gross margin in that period.

Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, under which we allocate the purchase price paid for a company to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is measured as the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to make assumptions, estimates, and judgments that are based on all available information, including comparable market data and information obtained from our management and the management of the acquired companies. These judgments affect the amount of consideration paid that is allocable to identified tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination. The estimation of the fair values of the intangible assets requires significant judgment and the use of valuation techniques including primarily the income approach. Consideration is given to all relevant factors that might affect the fair value such as estimates of future revenues and costs, present value factors, and the estimated useful lives of intangible assets.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We are required to estimate our provision for income taxes and amounts ultimately payable or recoverable in numerous tax jurisdictions around the world. These estimates involve significant judgment and interpretations of regulations and are inherently complex. Resolution of income tax treatments in individual jurisdictions may not be known for many years after completion of the applicable year. Deferred Incometax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the difference is expected to reverse.

Valuation allowances are provided to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that in management’s judgment is more-likely-than-not to be recoverable against future taxable income. The determination of a valuation allowance and when it should be released requires complex judgment. In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, we regularly evaluate both positive and negative evidence that may exist and consider whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

As part of our regular financial review process, we also assess the likelihood that our tax reporting positions will ultimately be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. To the extent it is determined it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that some portion or all of a tax reporting position will ultimately not be recognized and sustained, a provision for unrecognized tax benefit is provided by either reducing the applicable deferred tax asset or accruing an income tax liability. Our judgment regarding the sustainability of our tax reporting positions may change in the future due to changes in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to the related deferred tax assets or accrued income tax liabilities and an accompanying reduction or increase in income tax expense which may result in a corresponding increase or decrease in net income in the period when such determinations are made. We recognize the tax impact of including certain foreign earnings in U.S. taxable income as a period cost.

26

Results of Operations

Key elements of our Consolidated Statements of Operations, including as a percentage of revenue, are presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended *

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenue

 $660,356   100.0% $515,327   100.0% $408,120   100.0%
                         

Gross margin

  452,050   68.5   321,675   62.4   245,306   60.1 
                         

Research and development

  135,767   20.6   110,518   21.4   89,223   21.9 

Selling, general and, administrative

  122,076   18.5   105,617   20.5   95,331   23.4 

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

  3,778   0.6   2,613   0.5   4,449   1.1 

Restructuring charges

  2,551   0.4   940   0.2   3,937   1.0 

Acquisition related charges

  511   0.1   1,171   0.2       

Income from operations

 $187,367   28.4% $100,816   19.6% $52,366   12.8%

* The year ended January 2, 2021 was a 53-week year as compared to the other years presented, which were based on our standard 52-week year.

Revenue


  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenue

 $660,356  $515,327  $408,120   28.1%  26.3%

Revenue increased $145.0 million, or 28.1%, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021, primarily from our products used in data center servers, client computing solutions, 5G wireless infrastructure, industrial automation, and robotics applications.

Revenue by End Market

We sell our products though several channels:globally to a broad base of customers in three primary end markets groups: Communications and Computing, Industrial and Automotive, and Consumer. We also provide IP licensing and services to these end markets.

Within these end markets, there are multiple segment drivers, including:

Communications and Computing: datacenter servers and networking equipment, client computing platforms, and 5G communications infrastructure deployments,

Industrial and Automotive: factory automation, robotics, automotive electronics, and industrial IoT,

Consumer: smart home, prosumer, and other applications.

We also generate revenue from the licensing of our IP, the collection of certain royalties, patent sales, the revenue related to our participation in consortia and standard-setting activities, and services. While these activities may be associated with multiple markets, Licensing and services revenue is reported as a separate end market as it has characteristics that differ from other categories, most notably a higher gross margin.

The end market data below is derived from data provided to us by our customers. With a diverse base of customers who may manufacture end products spanning multiple end markets, the assignment of revenue to a specific end market requires the use of judgment. We also recognize certain revenue for which end customers and end markets are not yet known. We assign this revenue first to a specific end market using historical and anticipated usage of the specific products, if possible, and allocate the remainder to the end markets based on either historical usage for each product family or industry application data for certain product types.

The following are examples of end market applications for the fiscal years presented:

Communications and Computing

Industrial and Automotive

Consumer

Licensing and Services

Wireless

Security and Surveillance

Cameras

IP Royalties

Wireline

Machine Vision

Displays

Adopter Fees

Data Backhaul

Industrial Automation

Wearables

IP Licenses

Server Computing

Robotics

Televisions

Patent Sales

Client Computing

Automotive

Home Theater

Data Storage

Drones

The composition of our revenue by end market is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Communications and Computing

 $274,754   41.6% $217,960   42.3% $174,656   42.8%  26.1%  24.8%

Industrial and Automotive

  319,399   48.4   226,240   43.9   168,323   41.2   41.2   34.4 

Consumer

  49,064   7.4   50,652   9.8   45,523   11.2   (3.1)  11.3 

Licensing and Services

  17,139   2.6   20,475   4.0   19,618   4.8   (16.3)  4.4 

Total revenue

 $660,356   100.0% $515,327   100.0% $408,120   100.0%  28.1%  26.3%

Revenue from the Communications and Computing end market increased by 26% in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 primarily due to content expansion in datacenter servers, new greenfield client computing opportunities, 5G infrastructure, and datacenter networking.

Revenue from the Industrial and Automotive end market increased by 41% in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021, primarily due to strong customer adoption in a broad range of applications, including industrial automation and robotics. Growth in Automotive was driven by the adoption of new designs in ADAS and infotainment applications.

Revenue from the Consumer end market decreased by 3% in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 primarily due to macroeconomic weakness in Consumer in the current year.

Revenue from the Licensing and Services end market decreased by 16% in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 primarily due to decreased licensing and IP royalties.

Revenue by Geography

We assign revenue to geographies based on ship-to location of the customer.

The composition of our revenue by geography is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Asia

 $464,904   70.5% $384,568   74.6% $305,183   74.8%  20.9%  26.0%

Americas

  100,260   15.2   80,870   15.7   62,137   15.2   24.0   30.1 

Europe

  95,192   14.3   49,889   9.7   40,800   10.0   90.8   22.3 

Total revenue

 $660,356   100.0% $515,327   100.0% $408,120   100.0%  28.1%  26.3%

Revenue from Customers

We sell our products to independent distributors and directly to customers. Distributors have historically accounted for a significant portion of our total revenue, and the two distributor groups noted below individually accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue in the periods covered by this report.

The composition of our revenue by customer is presented in the following table:

  

% of Total Revenue

 
  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 
  

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Weikeng Group

  30.3%  37.2%  34.8%

Arrow Electronics Inc.

  28.5   27.1   25.1 

Other distributors

  30.7   23.0   23.2 

All distributors

  89.5   87.3   83.1%

Direct customers

  7.9   8.7   12.1 

Licensing and services revenue

  2.6   4.0   4.8 

Total revenue

  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%

Gross margin

The composition of our gross margin, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Gross margin

 $452,050  $321,675  $245,306 

Gross margin percentage

  68.5%  62.4%  60.1%

Product gross margin %

  67.6%  60.9%  58.1%

Licensing and services gross margin %

  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%

Gross margin percentage increased 610 basis points from fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2022. Improved margins were driven by benefits from our gross margin expansion strategy.

Because of its higher margin, the licensing and services portion of our overall revenue can have a disproportionate impact on Gross margin.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expense

The composition of our Research and development expense, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Research and development

 $135,767  $110,518  $89,223   22.8%  23.9%

Percentage of revenue

  20.6%  21.4%  21.9%        

Research and development expense includes costs for compensation and benefits, stock compensation, engineering wafers, depreciation, licenses, and outside engineering services. These expenditures are for the design of new products, IP cores, processes, packaging, and software solutions.

The increase in Research and development expense for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 was due primarily to increased headcount-related costs as we continue to invest in our long-term product roadmap.

We believe that investing in research and development is important to delivering innovative products to our customers and, therefore, we expect to continue to increase our investment in research and development.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense

The composition of our Selling, general, and administrative expense, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 $122,076  $105,617  $95,331   15.6%  10.8%

Percentage of revenue

  18.5%  20.5%  23.4%        

Selling, general, and administrative expense includes costs for compensation and benefits related to selling, general, and administrative employees, commissions, depreciation, professional and outside services, trade show, and travel expenses.

The increase in Selling, general, and administrative expense for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 was due primarily to increased headcount-related costs to support the growth of our business, and to increased legal expenses primarily related to the defense of claims outside the ordinary course of business.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets

The composition of our Amortization of acquired intangible assets, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

 $3,778  $2,613  $4,449   44.6%  (41.3)%

Percentage of revenue

  0.6%  0.5%  1.1%        

The increase in Amortization of acquired intangible assets for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 was due to the amortization expense for new intangible assets added in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021 through the acquisition of Mirametrix, Inc., partially offset by end customers, throughof the amortization period during the first quarter of fiscal 2022 for acquired intangible assets from previous acquisitions.

Restructuring Charges

The composition of our Restructuring charges, including as a networkpercentage of independent manufacturers' representatives,revenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Restructuring charges

 $2,551  $940  $3,937   171.4%  (76.1)%

Percentage of revenue

  0.4%  0.2%  1.0%        

Restructuring charges are comprised of expenses resulting from reductions in our worldwide workforce, consolidation of our facilities, removal of fixed assets from service, and indirectly throughcancellation of software contracts and engineering tools. Details of our restructuring plans and expenses incurred under them are discussed in Note 9 - Restructuring to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Restructuring charges increased in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 due to additional lease right-of-use asset impairment charges for our partially vacated facility in San Jose, California and contract termination fees in the current year under the internal restructuring plan that our management approved and executed in April 2019, as compared to minimal activity in the prior year.

Acquisition Related Charges

The composition of our Acquisition related charges, including as a networkpercentage of independent sell-inrevenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Acquisition related charges

 $511  $1,171  $   (56.4)%  100+% 

Percentage of revenue

  0.1%  0.2%  %        

Acquisition related charges include legal and sell-through distributors. Distributors provide periodic data regarding the product, price, quantity,professional fees directly related to acquisitions. For fiscal 2022 and end customer when products are resold,2021, Acquisition related charges were entirely attributable to our acquisition of Mirametrix in November 2021 and were comprised primarily of professional services including legal and accounting fees, as well as closing costs.

Interest Expense

The composition of our Interest expense, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the quantitiesfollowing table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Interest expense

 $(4,146) $(2,738) $(3,702)  51.4%  (26.0)%

Percentage of revenue

  (0.6)%  (0.5)%  (0.9)%        

Interest expense is primarily related to our long-term debt. This interest expense is comprised of contractual interest and amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs based on the effective interest method.

The increase in Interest expense for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 was driven by the increase in the applicable base rate for our long-term debt, the adjusted Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") from September 1, 2022, and the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") prior to that date.

Other (Expense) Income, net

The composition of our Other (expense) income, net, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Other (expense) income, net

 $(1,109) $(452) $(208)  145.4%  117.3%

Percentage of revenue

  (0.2)%  (0.1)%  (0.1)%        

For fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021, the increase in Other (expense) income, net was primarily due to the $0.7 million loss on refinancing of our long-term debt during the current year.

Income Taxes

The composition of our Income tax expense is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

         
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

  

% Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 $3,230  $1,704  $1,064   89.6%  60.2%

Our Income tax expense (benefit) is composed primarily of foreign income and withholding taxes, partially offset by benefits resulting from the release of uncertain tax positions ("UTP") due to statute of limitation expirations that occurred in the respective periods. The increase in expense in fiscal 2022 as compared to fiscal 2021 is primarily due to increased worldwide income and changes in uncertain tax positions.

We updated our evaluation of the valuation allowance position in the United States through December 31, 2022 and concluded that we should continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against the net federal and state deferred tax assets. In making this evaluation, we considered the uncertain stability of the current economic and operating environment and estimates about our ability to generate taxable income in future periods within the United States. We continue to evaluate future projected financial performance to determine whether such performance is sufficient evidence to support a reduction in or reversal of the valuation allowance. We will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence in future periods to determine if we will realize the deferred tax assets. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted if sufficient positive evidence exists. Details of our deferred tax assets and valuation allowance are discussed in Note 13 - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following sections discuss material changes in our financial condition from the end of fiscal 2021, including the effects of changes in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the effects of our credit arrangements and contractual obligations on our liquidity and capital resources. There continues to be uncertainty around the extent and duration of the disruption to our business, including from the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, market volatility, and inflationary pressures, which may impact our liquidity and working capital needs in future periods.

We have historically financed our operating and capital resource requirements through cash flows from operations, and from the issuance of long-term debt to fund acquisitions. Cash provided by or used in operating activities will fluctuate from period to period due to fluctuations in operating results, the timing and collection of accounts receivable, and required inventory levels, among other things. We believe that our financial resources, including current cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operating activities, and our credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and working capital needs through at least the next 12 months. On September 1, 2022, we entered into our 2022 Credit Agreement, as described in Note 8 - Long-Term Debt to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. As of December 31, 2022, we did not have significant long-term commitments for capital expenditures. For further information on our cash commitments for operating lease liabilities, see Note 10 - Leases to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

In the future, we may continue to consider acquisition opportunities to further extend our product or technology portfolios and further expand our product offerings. In connection with funding capital expenditures, acquisitions, securing additional wafer supply, increasing our working capital, or other operations, we may seek to obtain equity or additional debt financing. We may also seek to obtain equity or additional debt financing if we experience downturns or cyclical fluctuations in our business that are more severe or longer than we anticipated when determining our current working capital needs.

Liquidity

Cash and cash equivalents

(In thousands)

 December 31, 2022  January 1, 2022  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $145,722  $131,570  $14,152   10.8%

As of December 31, 2022, we had Cash and cash equivalents of $145.7 million, of which approximately $30.9 million in Cash and cash equivalents was held by our foreign subsidiaries. We manage our global cash requirements considering, among other things, (i) available funds among our subsidiaries through which we conduct business, (ii) the geographic location of our liquidity needs, and (iii) the cost to access international cash balances. The repatriation of non-US earnings may require us to withhold and pay foreign income tax on dividends. This should not result in our recording significant additional tax expense as we have accrued expense based on current withholding rates. As of December 31, 2022, we could access all cash held by our foreign subsidiaries without incurring significant additional expense.

The net increase in Cash and cash equivalents of $14.2 million between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 was primarily driven by cash flows from the following activities:

Operating activities — Cash provided by operating activities results from net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operating activities was $238.8 million in fiscal 2022 compared to $167.7 million in fiscal 2021. This increase of $71.1 million was primarily driven by an increase of $98.9 million provided by improved operating performance, partially offset by $27.8 million of changes in working capital, primarily from cash used by inventories.

Investing activities — Investing cash flows consist primarily of transactions related to capital expenditures and payments for software and intellectual property licenses, and a business acquisition in fiscal 2021. Net cash used by investing activities in fiscal 2022 was $34.9 million compared to $89.8 million in fiscal 2021. This $54.9 million decrease was primarily a result of the acquisition of Mirametrix in the prior year, which used cash, net of cash acquired, of $68.1 million. Total cash used for capital expenditures and payments for software and intellectual property licenses increased $13.2 million to $34.9 million in fiscal 2022 from $21.7 million in fiscal 2021.

Financing activities — Financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock, tax payments related to the net share settlement of restricted stock units, proceeds from the exercise of options to acquire common stock, and activity on our long-term debt. Net cash used by financing activities in fiscal 2022 was $188.1 million compared to $128.6 million in fiscal 2021. This $59.5 million increase was due to the following mix of activities. During fiscal 2022, we repurchased approximately 2.0 million shares of common stock for $110.1 million compared to repurchases in fiscal 2021 of approximately 1.3 million shares of common stock for $70.1 million. Payments for tax withholdings on vesting of RSUs partially offset by employee exercises of stock options used net cash flows of $47.8 million in fiscal 2022, an increase of approximately $2.4 million from the net $45.4 million used in fiscal 2021. In September 2022, we entered into our 2022 Credit Agreement and drew down an initial $150.0 million revolving loan at closing, which we used to pay off the $150.0 million outstanding balance on our previous term and revolving loans. In connection with the 2022 Credit Agreement, we paid $1.4 million in debt issuance costs. During fiscal 2022, we made a discretionary payment of $20.0 million on our current revolving loans, and we paid required quarterly installments on our previous long-term debt totaling $8.8 million. During fiscal 2021, we paid required quarterly installments on our long-term debt totaling $13.1 million.

Accounts receivable, net

(In thousands)

 December 31, 2022  January 1, 2022  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Accounts receivable, net

 $94,018  $79,859  $14,159   17.7%

Days sales outstanding - Overall

  49   51   (2)    

Accounts receivable, net as of December 31, 2022 increased by approximately $14.2 million, or approximately 18%, compared to January 1, 2022. This resulted primarily from higher revenue shipments in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021. We calculate Days sales outstanding on the basis of a 365-day year as Accounts receivable, net at the end of the quarter divided by sales during the quarter annualized and then multiplied by 365.

Inventories

(In thousands)

 December 31, 2022  January 1, 2022  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Inventories

 $110,375  $67,594  $42,781   63.3%

Days of inventory on hand

  187   122   65     

Inventories as of December 31, 2022 increased $42.8 million, or approximately 63%, compared to January 1, 2022 primarily to meet the increased demands of our customers and for new product ramps.

The Days of inventory on hand ratio compares the inventory balance at the end of a quarter to the cost of sales in that quarter. We calculate Days of inventory on hand on the basis of a 365-day year as Inventories at the end of the quarter divided by Cost of sales during the quarter annualized and then multiplied by 365.

Credit Arrangements

On September 1, 2022, we entered into our 2022 Credit Agreement. The details of this arrangement are described in Note 8 - Long-Term Debt to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. As of December 31, 2022, we had no used or unused credit arrangements beyond the secured revolving loan facility described in the 2022 Credit Agreement.

Share Repurchase Program

See "Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" under Part II, Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about the share repurchase program.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The information contained under the heading "New Accounting Pronouncements" in Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 7.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We assess these risks on a regular basis and have established policies that are designed to protect against the adverse effects of these and other potential exposures.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

While our revenues and the majority of our expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, our financial position and results of operations are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk as a result of having various international subsidiary and branch operations. Historically, exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk has not had a material impact on our results from operations. At times in the past, we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in relation to certain activities, which mitigated the foreign currency exchange rate exposure from an economic perspective, but these were not designated as "effective" hedges under U.S. GAAP.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk related to our indebtedness. At December 31, 2022, we had $130.0 million outstanding under our 2022 Credit Agreement. A hypothetical increase in the one-month SOFR by 1% (100 basis points) would increase our future interest expense by approximately $0.3 million per quarter.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenue

 $660,356  $515,327  $408,120 

Cost of revenue

  208,306   193,652   162,814 

Gross margin

  452,050   321,675   245,306 

Operating expenses:

            

Research and development

  135,767   110,518   89,223 

Selling, general, and administrative

  122,076   105,617   95,331 

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

  3,778   2,613   4,449 

Restructuring charges

  2,551   940   3,937 

Acquisition related charges

  511   1,171    

Total operating expenses

  264,683   220,859   192,940 

Income from operations

  187,367   100,816   52,366 

Interest expense

  (4,146)  (2,738)  (3,702)

Other (expense) income, net

  (1,109)  (452)  (208)

Income before income taxes

  182,112   97,626   48,456 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  3,230   1,704   1,064 

Net income

 $178,882  $95,922  $47,392 
             

Net income per share:

            

Basic

 $1.30  $0.70  $0.35 

Diluted

 $1.27  $0.67  $0.34 
             

Shares used in per share calculations:

            

Basic

  137,321   136,619   135,220 

Diluted

  140,667   142,143   141,276 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Net income

 $178,882  $95,922  $47,392 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Translation adjustment

  (1,554)  (75)  1,533 

Change in actuarial valuation of defined benefit pension, net of tax

  591   372   (678)

Comprehensive income

 $177,919  $96,219  $48,247 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


  

December 31,

  

January 1,

 

(In thousands, except share and par value data)

 

2022

  

2022

 

ASSETS

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $145,722  $131,570 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses

  94,018   79,859 

Inventories, net

  110,375   67,594 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  29,052   22,328 

Total current assets

  379,167   301,351 

Property and equipment, net

  47,614   38,094 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  17,590   23,818 

Intangible assets, net

  25,070   29,782 

Goodwill

  315,358   315,358 

Other long-term assets

  13,914   18,091 

Total assets

 $798,713  $726,494 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

        

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

 $42,036  $34,597 

Accrued liabilities

  48,467   26,444 

Accrued payroll obligations

  36,870   27,967 

Current portion of long-term debt

     17,173 

Total current liabilities

  127,373   106,181 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

  128,752   140,760 

Long-term operating lease liabilities, net of current portion

  13,618   19,248 

Other long-term liabilities

  41,807   48,672 

Total liabilities

  311,550   314,861 

Contingencies (Note 15)

          

Stockholders' equity:

        

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

      

Common stock, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 137,099,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and 137,239,000 shares issued and outstanding as of January 1, 2022

  1,371   1,372 

Additional paid-in capital

  599,300   701,688 

Accumulated deficit

  (111,094)  (289,976)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (2,414)  (1,451)

Total stockholders' equity

  487,163   411,633 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $798,713  $726,494 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

            

Net income

 $178,882  $95,922  $47,392 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

            

Depreciation and amortization

  29,323   24,429   25,140 

Stock-based compensation expense

  55,530   46,475   40,372 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

  6,512   6,587   5,960 

Impairment of operating lease right-of-use asset

  1,149       

Other non-cash adjustments

  642   (239)  144 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

            

Accounts receivable, net

  (14,159)  (12,013)  336 

Inventories, net

  (42,781)  (2,995)  (9,619)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  (6,276)  1,918   (6,441)

Accounts payable

  7,439   7,046   (16,820)

Accrued liabilities

  20,101   (2,855)  6,314 

Accrued payroll obligations

  8,903   9,692   4,624 

Operating lease liabilities, current and long-term portions

  (6,459)  (6,245)  (5,715)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  238,806   167,722   91,687 

Cash flows from investing activities:

            

Cash paid for business acquisition, net of cash acquired

     (68,099)   

Capital expenditures

  (23,338)  (9,835)  (12,121)

Cash paid for software and intellectual property licenses

  (11,594)  (11,862)  (8,747)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  (34,932)  (89,796)  (20,868)

Cash flows from financing activities:

            

Restricted stock unit tax withholdings

  (54,946)  (54,191)  (26,965)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  7,159   8,827   10,103 

Repurchase of common stock

  (110,132)  (70,124)  (14,989)

Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance costs

  148,597      50,000 

Repayment of long-term debt

  (178,750)  (13,125)  (26,250)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (188,072)  (128,613)  (8,101)

Effect of exchange rate change on cash

  (1,650)  (75)  1,533 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  14,152   (50,762)  64,251 

Beginning cash and cash equivalents

  131,570   182,332   118,081 

Ending cash and cash equivalents

 $145,722  $131,570  $182,332 
             

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information and non-cash investing and financing activities:

            

Interest paid

 $3,973  $2,313  $3,700 

Operating lease payments

 $7,419  $7,639  $7,713 

Income taxes paid, net of refunds

 $4,621  $3,304  $1,868 

Accrued purchases of plant and equipment

 $1,357  $1,360  $975 

Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations

 $2,134  $8,134  $2,645 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY


                  

Accumulated

     
  

Common Stock

  

Additional

      

Other

     
  

($.01 par value)

  

Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Comprehensive

     

(In thousands, except par value data)

 

Shares

  

Amount

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Income (Loss)

  

Total

 

Balances, December 28, 2019

  133,883  $1,339  $762,213  $(433,290) $(2,603) $327,659 

Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:

                        

Net income

           47,392      47,392 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

              855   855 

Total comprehensive income

                  48,247 

Common stock issued in connection with employee equity incentive plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes

  2,738   27   (16,889)        (16,862)

Stock-based compensation expense

        40,372         40,372 

Repurchase of common stock

  (385)  (4)  (14,985)        (14,989)

Balances, January 2, 2021

  136,236  $1,362  $770,711  $(385,898) $(1,748) $384,427 

Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:

                        

Net income

           95,922      95,922 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

              297   297 

Total comprehensive income

                  96,219 

Common stock issued in connection with employee equity incentive plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes

  2,270   23   (45,387)        (45,364)

Stock-based compensation expense

        46,475         46,475 

Repurchase of common stock

  (1,267)  (13)  (70,111)        (70,124)

Balances, January 1, 2022

  137,239  $1,372  $701,688  $(289,976) $(1,451) $411,633 

Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:

                        

Net income

           178,882      178,882 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

              (963)  (963)

Total comprehensive income

                  177,919 

Common stock issued in connection with employee equity incentive plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes

  1,812   18   (47,806)        (47,788)

Stock-based compensation expense

        55,530         55,530 

Repurchase of common stock

  (1,952)  (19)  (110,112)        (110,131)

Balances, December 31, 2022

  137,099  $1,371  $599,300  $(111,094) $(2,414) $487,163 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP") and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). They include the accounts of Lattice and its subsidiaries after the elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments affecting the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, knowledge of current conditions, and our beliefs of what could occur in the future considering available information. While we believe that our estimates, assumptions, and judgments are reasonable, they are based on information available when made, and because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, the actual results that we experience may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis.

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Fiscal Reporting Periods

We report based on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. Our fiscal 2022 was a 52-week year that ended on December 31, 2022. Our fiscal 2021 was a 52-week year that ended on January 1, 2022, and our fiscal 2020 was a 53-week year that ended on January 2, 2021. All references to quarterly or annual financial results are references to the results for the relevant fiscal period.

Concentrations of Risk

Potential exposure to concentrations of risk may impact revenue, accounts receivable, and supply of wafers for our new products.

Distributors have historically accounted for a significant portion of our total revenue. Our two largest distributor groups, the Weikeng Group ("Weikeng") and Arrow Electronics, Inc. ("Arrow"), each account for more than 10% of our total revenue and our net accounts receivable. Revenue attributable to distributors as a percentage of total revenue is presented in the following table:

  

Year Ended

 
  December 31,  January 1,  January 2, 
  2022  2022  2021 

Weikeng Group

  30%  37%  35%

Arrow Electronics Inc.

  28   27   25 

Other distributors

  31   23   23 

Revenue attributable to distributors

  89%  87%  83%

At December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022, Weikeng accounted for approximately 47% and 59%, respectively, and Arrow accounted for approximately 27% and 28%, respectively, of net accounts receivable.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is mitigated by our credit and collection process including active management of collections, credit limits, routine credit evaluations for essentially all customers, and secure transactions with letters of credit or advance payments where appropriate. We regularly review our allowance for doubtful accounts and the aging of our accounts receivable.

We rely on a limited number of foundries for our wafer purchases. We seek to mitigate the concentration of supply risk by establishing, maintaining and managing multiple foundry relationships; however, certain of our products they stillare sourced from a single foundry and changing from one foundry to another can have a significant cost, or create delays in stock.production or shipments, among other factors.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all investments that are readily convertible into cash and that have original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of highly liquid investments in time deposits or money market accounts and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Deposits with financial institutions at times exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.

40


Foreign Exchange and Translation of Foreign Currencies

While our revenues and the majority of our expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, we also have international subsidiaries and branch operations that conduct some transactions in currencies that differ from the functional currency of that entity. Gains or losses from foreign exchange rate fluctuations on balances denominated in currencies that differ from the functional currencies are reflected in Other expense, net.

We translate accounts denominated in foreign currencies in accordance with ASC 830,Foreign Currency Matters,” using the current rate method under which asset and liability accounts are translated at the current rate, while stockholders' equity accounts are translated at the appropriate historical rates, and revenue and expense accounts are translated at average monthly exchange rates. Translation adjustments related to the consolidation of foreign subsidiary financial statements are reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in Stockholders' equity (See our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity).

Revenue Recognition

Under the terms of ASC 606,"Revenue from Contracts with Customers", we recognize revenue when we satisfy performance obligations as evidenced by the transfer of control of our products or services to customers. For sales to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs")distributors, we have concluded that our contracts are with the distributor, rather than with the distributor’s end customer, as we hold a contract bearing enforceable rights and sell-in distributorsobligations only with the distributor. Our revenue is generally recognized upon shipment. Reserves for sell-in stock rotations, where applicable, are estimated basedderived primarily on historical experience and provided for at the time of shipment. Revenue from sales of silicon-based products, with additional revenue from sales of silicon-enabling products. We consider customer purchase orders, which in some cases are governed by master sales agreements, to be the contracts with a customer. For each contract, we consider our sell-through distributorspromise to transfer each distinct product to be the identified performance obligations. Revenue for product sales is recognized at the time of reported resale. Under both types of revenue recognition, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title has transferred, collection of resulting receivables is reasonably assured, and there are no remaining customer acceptance requirements and no remaining significant performance obligations.



Orders from our sell-through distributors are initially recorded at published list prices; however, for a majority of our sales, the final selling price isproduct shipment, as determined at the time of resale and in accordance with a distributor price agreement. For this reason, we do not recognize revenue until products are resold by sell-through distributors to an end customer. In certain circumstances, we allow sell-through distributors to return unsold products. At times, we protect our sell-through distributors against reductions in published list prices.

At the time of shipment to sell-through distributors, we (a) record accounts receivable at published list price since there is a legally enforceable obligation from the distributor to pay us currently for product delivered, (b) relieve inventory for the carrying value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributor, and (c) record deferred revenue and deferred cost of sales in Deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors in the liability section of our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Revenue and cost of sales to sell-through distributors are deferred until either the product is resold by the distributor or, in certain cases, return privileges terminate, at which time Revenue and Cost of product revenue are reflected in Net loss in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and Accounts receivable, net is adjusted to reflect the final selling price.

Licensing and Services Revenue

agreed upon contract shipping terms.

Our licensingLicensing and services revenue is comprised of revenue from our intellectual property ("IP")IP core licensing activity, patent monetization activities, design services, and royalty and adopter fee revenue from our standards activities. These activities are complementary to our product sales and help us to monetize our IP and accelerate market adoption curves associated with our technology and standards.


From time We consider licensing arrangements with our customers and agreements with the standards consortia of which we are a member to timebe the contract. For each contract, we enter into patent sale and licensing agreementsconsider the promise to monetize anddeliver a license a broad portfolio of our patented inventions. Such licensing agreements may include upfront license fees and ongoing royalties. The contractual terms ofthat grants the agreements generally provide for payments of upfront license fees and/or royalties over an extended period of time. Revenue from such license fees is recognized when payments become due and payable as long as all other revenue recognition criteria are met, while revenue from royalties is recognized when reported to us by customers.

We enter into IP licensing agreements that generally provide licenseescustomer the right to incorporate ouruse the IP, components intoas well as any professional services provided under the contract, as distinct performance obligations. We recognize license revenue at the point in time that control of the license transfers to the customer, which is generally upon delivery, or as usage occurs.

We measure revenue based on the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for products or services. Variable consideration is estimated and reflected as an adjustment to the transaction price. We determine variable consideration, which consists primarily of various sales price concessions, by estimating the most likely amount of consideration we expect to receive from the customer based on an analysis of historical rebate claims over a period of time considered adequate to account for current pricing and business trends. Sales rebates earned by customers are offset against their products pursuant to terms and conditions that varyreceivable balances. Rebates earned by licensee. Revenue earned under these agreements is classified ascustomers when they do not have outstanding receivable balances are recorded within Accrued liabilities. Licensing and services revenue. Our IP licensing agreements generally include multiple elements,revenue, which may include one or more off-the-shelf or customizedincludes HDMI and MHL standards revenue, as well as certain IP licenses, bundled with support services covering a fixed periodincludes variable consideration in the form of time,usage-based royalties.

We generally one year. If the different elements of a multiple-element arrangement qualify as separate units of accounting, we allocate the total arrangement consideration to each element based on relative selling price.


Amounts allocated to off-the-shelf IP licenses are recognized at the time of sale provided the other conditions for revenue recognition have been met. Amounts allocatedprovide an assurance warranty that our products will substantially conform to the support services are deferred and recognized onpublished specifications for twelve months from the date of shipment. In some cases, the warranty period may be longer than twelve months. We do not separately price or sell the assurance warranty. Our liability is limited to either a straight-line basis overcredit equal to the support period, generally one year. Certain licensing agreements provide for royalty payments based on agreed-upon royalty rates, which may be fixedpurchase price or variable depending on the termsreplacement of the agreement. The amountdefective part. Under the practical expedient provided by ASC 340, we generally expense sales commissions when incurred because the amortization period would be less than one year. We record these costs within Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Substantially all of revenue we recognize is based on a specified time period or on the agreed-upon royalty rate multiplied by the reported number of units shipped by the customer.

From time to time, we enter into IP licensing agreements that involve significant modification, customization or engineering services. Revenues derived from these contractsour performance obligations are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method or completed contract method. The completed contract method is used for contracts where there is a risk associated with final acceptance by the customer or for short-term contracts.

satisfied within twelve months.

Inventories and Cost of Product Revenue

Inventories are recordedstated at the lower of averageactual cost determined(determined using the first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. We review and set standard costs quarterly to approximate current actual manufacturing costs. Our manufacturing overhead standards for product costs are calculated assuming full absorption of actual spending over actual costs. The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate excess or obsolete inventory. Material assumptions we use to estimate necessary inventory carrying value adjustments can be unique to each product and are based on a first-in-first-out basis or market. We establishspecific facts and circumstances. In determining provisions for inventory if it isexcess or obsolete orproducts, we hold quantities which areconsider assumptions such as changes in excess ofbusiness and economic conditions, projected customer demand.demand for our products, and changes in technology or customer requirements. The creation of such provisions results in a write-down of inventory to net realizable value and a charge to Cost of product revenue.


Restructuring Charges

Expenses associated with exit Lower of cost or disposal activities are recognized when incurred under ASC 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,” for everything but severance. Because the Company has a historynet realizable value is based on assumptions such as recent historical sales activity and selling prices, as well as estimates of paying severance benefits, the cost of severance benefits associated with a restructuring plan is recorded when suchfuture sales activity and selling prices. Shipping and handling costs are probableincluded in Cost of revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

41

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the amount can be reasonablystraight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to five years for equipment and software, and one to three years for tooling. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the non-cancelable lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets. We capitalize costs for the fabrication of masks used by our foundry partners to manufacture our products. The capitalized mask costs begin depreciating to Cost of revenue once the products go into production, and depreciation is straight-lined over a three-year period, which is the expected useful life of the mask. Upon disposal of property and equipment, the accounts are relieved of the costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization, and resulting gains or losses are reflected in accordance with ASC 712, “Compensation - Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” When leased facilitiesthe Consolidated Statements of Operations for recognized gains and losses. Repair and maintenance costs are vacated, an amount equalexpensed as incurred.

Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, under which we allocate the purchase price paid for a company to the total future lease obligations fromidentifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of vacatingacquisition. Goodwill is measured as the premises throughexcess of purchase price over the expirationfair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Determining the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to make assumptions, estimates, and judgments that are based on all available information, including comparable market data and information obtained from our management and the management of the lease, netacquired companies. The estimation of anythe fair values of the intangible assets requires significant judgment and the use of valuation techniques including primarily the income approach. Consideration is given to all relevant factors that might affect the fair value such as estimates of future sublease income, is recorded as a partrevenues and costs, present value factors, and the estimated useful lives of restructuring charges.



intangible assets. We expense acquisition-related costs in the period incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


Long-lived assets, includingwhich consist primarily of property and equipment, amortizable intangible assets, and right-of-use assets, are carried on our financial statements based on their cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization. We monitor the carrying value of our long-lived assets for potential impairment and test the recoverability of such assets annually during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. These events or changes in circumstances, including management decisions pertaining to such assets, are referred to as impairment indicators. If an impairment indicator occurs, we perform a test of recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset group to its undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the carrying values are in excess of undiscounted expected future cash flows, we measure any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset group to its carrying value. Fair value is generally determined by considering (i) internally developed discounted projected cash flow analysis of the asset group; (ii) actual third-partythird-party valuations; and/or (iii) information available regarding the current market for similar asset groups. If the fair value of the asset group is determined to be less than the carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment in the amount of the difference is recorded in the period that the impairment indicator occurs and is included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and projections may vary from the cash flows eventually realized, which could impact our ability to accurately assess whether an asset has been impaired.


Valuation of Goodwill


Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. We review goodwillGoodwill is not amortized, but is instead tested for impairment annually during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, we make a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the reporting unit's fair value is less than the carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication ofthen goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and we must measure the impairment loss.unit. The impairment loss, if any, is recognized for any excess ofthe amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill over the implied fair value of the goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocatingexceeds the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis.value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, no further impairment analysis is neededneeded. For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, we currently operate as a single reporting unit.

Leases

We account for leases under the terms of ASC 842, "Leases," which requires lessees to record assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Upon adoption, we elected the "package of practical expedients" that would allow us to carryforward our historical lease classifications, not reassess historical contracts to determine if they contain leases, and not reassess the initial direct costs for any existing leases. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components, which we applied to all asset classes. Concurrent with our adoption of Topic 842, we early adopted ASU 2019-01,Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements, which granted disclosure relief for interim periods during the year in which a company adopted Topic 842.

42


Right-of-use ("ROU") assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized on the commencement date of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we determine the present value of lease payments using an incremental borrowing rate based on information from our commercial bank for an equivalent borrowing and term in the respective region as of the lease commencement date. At inception, we determine if an arrangement is a lease, if it includes options to extend or terminate the lease, and if it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the options. Lease cost, representing lease payments over the term of the lease and any capitalizable direct costs less any incentives received, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as lease expense. We have operating leases for corporate offices, sales offices, research and development facilities, storage facilities, and a data center.

The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. When deemed reasonably certain of exercise, the renewal options are included in the determination of the lease term and lease payment obligation, respectively. For our leases that contain variable lease payments, residual value guarantees, or restrictive covenants, we have concluded that these inputs are not significant to the determination of the ROU asset and lease liability.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses include costs for compensation and benefits, engineering wafers, depreciation, licenses, and outside engineering services. These expenditures are for the design of new products, intellectual property cores, processes, packaging, and software solutions. Research and development costs are generally expensed as incurred, with certain licensed technology agreements capitalized as intangible assets and amortized to Research and development expense over their estimated useful lives.

Restructuring Charges

Expenses associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized when incurred under ASC 420,Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,” for everything except severance expenses and vacated leased facilities. Because we have a history of paying severance benefits, the cost of severance benefits associated with a restructuring plan is recorded when such costs are probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated in accordance with ASC 712,Compensation - Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” When leased facilities are vacated, the amount of any ROU asset impairment is calculated in accordance with ASC 360, "Property, Plant, and Equipment" and recorded as a part of restructuring charges. Expenses from other exit or disposal activities, including the cancellation of software contracts and engineering tools or the abandonment of long-lived assets, is recorded as a part of Restructuring charges.

Accounting for Income Taxes


Our

We are required to estimate our provision for income taxes and amounts ultimately payable or recoverable in numerous tax is comprisedjurisdictions around the world. These estimates involve significant judgment and interpretations of our currentregulations and are inherently complex. Resolution of income tax liability and changestreatments in deferred tax assets and liabilities.individual jurisdictions may not be known for many years after completion of the applicable year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the difference is expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that in management’s judgment is more-likely-than-notmore-likely-than-not to be recoverable against future taxable income. U.S.The determination of a valuation allowance and when it should be released requires complex judgment.

In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax reform required a deemed repatriationassets, we evaluate both positive and negative evidence that may exist and consider whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of foreign earnings as of December 30, 2017 and no future U.S. taxesthe deferred tax assets will be due on these earnings becauserealized. The ultimate realization of enactmentdeferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of a 100% dividends received deduction. Foreign earnings may be subjectfuture taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Any adjustment to withholding taxes if they are distributed and repatriated to Latticethe net deferred tax asset valuation allowance is recorded in the United States.


Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period that the adjustment is determined to be required.

Our income tax calculations are based on application of the respective U.S. federal, state or foreign tax law. law. Our tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the relevant tax authorities. Accordingly, we recognize tax liabilities based upon our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due when such estimates are more-likely-than-notmore-likely-than-not to be sustained. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different than the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases as well as any interest or penalties are recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


In assessing We recognize the abilitytax impact of including certain foreign earnings in U.S. taxable income as a period cost.

43

Stock-Based Compensation

We estimate the fair value of share-based awards consistent with the provisions of ASC 718,Compensation - Stock Compensation.” We value RSUs using the closing market price on the date of grant, and we value stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We have also granted RSUs with a market condition or a performance condition to realize deferredcertain executives. The terms of these grants, including achievement criteria and vesting schedules, are detailed under the heading "Market-Based and Performance-Based Awards — Grants" in "Note 11 - Stock-Based Compensation Plans." Our current practice is to issue new shares to satisfy option exercises. For RSUs, we issue new shares when awards vest and withhold a portion of these shares on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax assets, withholding requirements.

Segment Information

As of December 31, 2022, we evaluate both positivehad one operating segment: the core Lattice business, which includes silicon-based and negative evidence that may existsilicon-enabling products, evaluation boards, development hardware, and consider whether itrelated intellectual property licensing, services, and sales. Our chief operating decision maker is more-likely-than-not that some portion or allthe Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results and financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions, allocating resources, and evaluating financial performance.

Note 2 - Net Income Per Share

Our calculation of the deferred tax assets willdiluted share count includes the number of shares from our equity awards with market conditions or performance conditions that would be realized. The ultimate realizationissuable under the terms of deferred tax assetssuch awards at the end of the reporting period. For equity awards with a market condition, the number of shares included in the diluted share count as of the end of each period presented is dependent upondetermined by measuring the generationachievement of future taxable income during the periodsmarket condition as of the end of the respective reporting periods. For equity awards with a performance condition, the number of shares that qualified for vesting as of the end of each period presented are included in which those temporary differences become deductible.



Resultsthe diluted share count when the condition for their issuance was satisfied by the end of Operations

Key elementsthe respective reporting periods. See "Note 11 - Stock-Based Compensation Plans" for further discussion of our Consolidated Statementsequity awards with market or performance conditions.

A summary of Operations are presented in the following table:

 Year Ended
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
January 2, 2016 *
Revenue$385,961
 100.0 % $427,054
 100.0 % $405,966
 100.0 %
            
Gross margin216,579
 56.1
 246,434
 57.7
 219,909
 54.2
Research and development103,357
 26.8
 117,518
 27.5
 136,868
 33.7
Selling, general, and administrative90,718
 23.5
 98,602
 23.1
 97,349
 24.0
Amortization of acquired intangible assets31,340
 8.1
 33,575
 7.9
 29,580
 7.3
Restructuring charges7,196
 1.9
 9,267
 2.2
 19,239
 4.7
Acquisition related charges3,781
 1.0
 6,305
 1.5
 22,450
 5.5
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets32,431
 8.4
 7,866
 1.8
 21,655
 5.3
Gain on sale of building(4,624) (1.2) 
 
 
 
Loss from operations$(47,620) (12.3)% $(26,699) (6.3)% $(107,232) (26.4)%
* Lattice acquired Silicon Image on March 10, 2015. Results of Operations for the year ended January 2, 2016 (fiscal 2015) include the financial results of the Silicon Image business for the approximately 10-month period from March 11, 2015 through January 2, 2016.

Revenue
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Revenue$385,961
 $427,054
 $405,966
 (10) 5

Revenue decreased $41.1 million, or 10%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, primarily driven by lower revenue from consumer mobile handsetsbasic and reductions from Digital Television ("DTV") and Home Theater related devices. This was coupled with a decline from the line item reduction caused by the obsoleting of tin leaded assembly material in one of the complex programmable logic devices ("CPLD") in the industrial and communications markets, for which shipments predominately occurred in fiscal 2016 but did not recur in fiscal 2017. These decreases were partially offset by a broad market increase in programmable logic device revenue in the Industrial and Automotive end market, and the production ramp of a server reference design being widely adopted in the computing market. Additionally, we saw growth in our XO2/XO3 and EC5 product families, revenue from a patent sale transaction, and modest growth in the 60GHz wireless silicon products.

Revenue increased $21.1 million, or 5%, in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, primarily driven by approximately $40.6 million of growth in the Industrial and Automotive end market for programmable logic devices, along with a significant increase in new programmable production volume for a major mobile handset provider, and the inclusion of additional revenue in connection with our acquisition of Silicon Image for the full year of fiscal 2016 relative to only an approximately 10-month period in fiscal 2015, partially offset by approximately $20.4 million of decline in the Communications and Computing end market for programmable logic devices.


Revenue by End Market

The end market data below is derived from data provided to us by our distributors and end customers. With a diverse base of customers who may manufacture end products spanning multiple end markets, the assignment of revenue to a specific end market requires the use of estimates and judgment. Therefore, actual results may differ from those reported. Our Licensing and services end market includes revenue from the licensing of our IP, the collection of certain royalties, patent sales, the revenue related to our participation in consortia and standard-setting activities, and services. While Licensing products are primarily sold into the Mobile and Consumer market, Licensing and services revenue is reported separately as it has characteristics that differ from other categories, most notably its higher gross margin.

The following are examples of end market applications:
Communications and ComputingMobile and ConsumerIndustrial and AutomotiveLicensing and Services
WirelessSmartphonesSecurity and SurveillanceIP Royalties
WirelineCamerasMachine VisionAdopter Fees
Data BackhaulDisplaysIndustrial AutomationIP Licenses
ComputingTabletsHuman Computer InteractionPatent Sales
ServersWearablesAutomotiveTesting Services
Data StorageTelevisions and Home TheaterDrones

The composition of our revenue by end marketdiluted Net income per share is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended *  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Communications and Computing$113,019
 29% $123,021
 29% $143,424
 35% (8) (14)
Mobile and Consumer108,844
 28
 127,405
 30
 126,130
 31
 (15) 1
Industrial and Automotive134,639
 35
 140,278
 33
 99,646
 25
 (4) 41
Licensing and Services29,459
 8
 36,350
 8
 36,766
 9
 (19) (1)
Total revenue$385,961
 100% $427,054
 100% $405,966
 100% (10) 5
* During

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Net income

 $178,882  $95,922  $47,392 
             

Shares used in basic Net income per share

  137,321   136,619   135,220 

Dilutive effect of stock options, RSUs, ESPP shares, and equity awards with a market condition or performance condition

  3,346   5,524   6,056 

Shares used in diluted Net income per share

  140,667   142,143   141,276 
             

Basic Net income per share

 $1.30  $0.70  $0.35 

Diluted Net income per share

 $1.27  $0.67  $0.34 

The computation of diluted Net income per share excludes the first quartereffects of fiscal 2016, we realigned our endstock options, RSUs, ESPP shares, and equity awards with a market categoriescondition or performance condition that are antidilutive, aggregating to group Computing with Communications rather than with

Industrial, as had beenapproximately the previous grouping. Prior periods have been reclassified to match current period presentation.

Our revenue in the Communications and Computing end market is largely dependent on a smallfollowing number of large telecommunications equipment providers. For fiscal 2017, Communications and Computing end market revenue declined 8% primarily in the communications market, which saw a significant decrease in revenue from a major telecommunications customer whose business was affected by Commerce department actions, and by conversionshares:

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Stock options, RSUs, ESPP shares, and equity awards with a market condition or performance condition excluded as they are antidilutive

  472   638   646 

44


Mobile and Consumer end market revenue decreased 15% in fiscal 2017, after increasing 1% in fiscal 2016. Mobile and Consumer end market revenue decreased in fiscal 2017 primarily due to a significant decrease in volume for a major mobile handset provider. The production volume for this mobile handset peaked in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, and the associated revenue stream has declined in subsequent quarters as the end product completes its lifecycle. These decreases were coupled with declines in revenue from HDMI devices used in DTV and Home Theater related products and from MHL devices used in mobile handsets. Mobile and Consumer end market revenue increased in fiscal 2016 primarily due to a significant increase in new programmable production volume for a major mobile handset provider offset by a nearly equal decline in ASSP shipments related to high-definition television ("HDTV") and mobile handsets.

For fiscal 2017, Industrial and Automotive end market revenue decreased 4% when compared to fiscal 2016. This is primarily due to a decline from the line item reduction caused by the obsoleting of tin leaded assembly material in one of the CPLD devices for which shipments predominately occurred in fiscal 2016 but did not recur in fiscal 2017. This decrease was substantially offset by broad market growth in this end market, especially from our XO2/XO3 FPGA product families. For fiscal 2016, Industrial and Automotive end market revenue increased 41% when compared to fiscal 2015. This is primarily due to strength in programmable products revenue resulting from line item reduction caused by the obsoleting of tin leaded assembly material in one of the CPLD devices affecting both the Americas and Europe.


Licensing and Services revenue decreased by 19% in fiscal 2017 primarily due to lower revenue from HDMI licensing and adopter fees as a new royalty sharing agreement had not been finalized, and by the termination of our role as agent for the HDMI consortium. As a result of the amended model for sharing revenue and the appointment of a new independent agent for the HDMI consortium, we will be entitled to a reduced share of adopter fees paid by parties adopting the HDMI standard in 2017 and future years. The termination of our role as agent for the HDMI consortium resulted in a decrease of approximately $11 million for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. While a new royalty sharing agreement is being negotiated, the HDMI agent is collecting royalties but is unable to distribute a majority of the royalties to the Founders. Given that a new royalty sharing agreement was not fully executed under current revenue guidance, the fixed and determinable revenue recognition criteria was not met, and we were unable to recognize all of the HDMI royalty revenue in fiscal 2017. Revenue attributable to HDMI royalties is down approximately $9 million for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 mainly as a result of the royalty sharing formula not being finalized. The decrease related to HDMI was partially offset by a patent sale transaction of $18 million in fiscal 2017.

Licensing and Services revenue decreased by 1% in fiscal 2016 primarily due to slightly reduced license and adopter fees at licensed end customers. Licensing and Services revenue was first recognized in fiscal 2015 following the acquisition of Silicon Image in March 2015. Previously, we did not have Licensing and Services revenue. Revenue from this end market is expected to fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period as a result of the timing of completion of IP license arrangements, IP sales, patent sales, and settlement of royalty audits.

Based on our assessment of the implementation of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09,

Note 3 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), we anticipate that, until an HDMI royalty sharing agreement is reached, the new standard will allow us to recognize certain licensing revenues which are not recognizable under current GAAP due to the fixed

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following tables provide information about revenue from contracts with customers disaggregated by channel and determinable revenue recognition criteria not being met. Once an HDMI royalty sharing agreement is reached, we will not be able to recognize HDMI royalty revenues related to prior periods under the new standard that we would have been able to recognize under current GAAP. We estimate that the effect on 2018 licensing revenues under the new standard will be an increase of $5 million to $10 million if a royalty sharing agreement is not reached in 2018, and a decrease of $5 million to $10 million if a royalty sharing agreement is reached in 2018.


Revenue by Geography

We assign revenue to geographies based on customer ship-to address at the point where revenue is recognized. In the case of sell-in distributors and OEM customers, revenue is typically recognized, and geography is assigned, when products are shipped to our distributor or OEM customer. In the case of sell-through distributors, revenue is recognized when resale to the end customer occurs and geography is assigned based on the end customer location on the resale reports provided by the distributor. Both foreign and domestic sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.

The composition of our revenue by geography,geographical market, based on ship-to location is presented inof the following table: 
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Asia$277,638
 72% $305,093
 71% $308,534
 76% (9) (1)
Europe44,547
 12
 59,835
 14
 55,596
 14
 (26) 8
Americas63,776
 16
 62,126
 15
 41,836
 10
 3
 48
Total revenue$385,961
 100% $427,054
 100% $405,966
 100% (10) 5

Revenue in Asia decreased 9% in fiscal 2017customer:

  

Year Ended

 

Revenue by Channel

 

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Product revenue - Distributors

 $591,229   89% $449,650   87% $339,100   83%

Product revenue - Direct

  51,988   8%  45,202   9%  49,402   12%

Licensing and services

  17,139   3%  20,475   4%  19,618   5%

Total revenue

 $660,356   100% $515,327   100% $408,120   100%
                         

Revenue by Geographical Market

                        

(In thousands)

                        

United States

 $94,972   14% $60,176   12% $43,945   11%

Other Americas

  5,288   1%  20,694   4%  18,192   4%

Americas

  100,260   15%  80,870   16%  62,137   15%

China

  296,917   45%  281,237   55%  213,714   52%

Japan

  90,902   14%  47,915   9%  25,435   6%

Other Asia

  77,085   12%  55,416   10%  66,034   17%

Asia

  464,904   71%  384,568   74%  305,183   75%

Europe

  95,192   14%  49,889   10%  40,800   10%

Total revenue

 $660,356   100% $515,327   100% $408,120   100%

Contract Balances

Our contract assets relate to our rights to consideration for licenses and decreased 1% in fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2017, revenue decreased in Asia primarilyroyalties due to a significant decrease in Communications and Computing end market revenue from a major telecommunications customer whose business was affected by government regulations, and by conversion of materials from 200mm to 300mm wafers. Additionally, the Mobile and Consumer end market saw a significant decrease in volume for a major North American mobile handset provider. The production volume for this mobile handset peaked in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, and the associated revenue stream has declined in subsequent quarters as the end product completes its lifecycle. This was coupled with decreased revenue from DTV and Home Theater related devices. In fiscal 2016, revenue decreased in Asia primarily due to declines in HDTV and ASSP revenue, although these were substantially offset by increases in revenue from field programmable gate array logic products in the Mobile and Consumer end market. We believe the Asia Pacific region will remain the primary source of our revenue due to relatively more favorable business conditions in Asia and a continuing trend towards the migration of manufacturing by North American and European customers to the Asia Pacific region.


Revenue in Europe decreased 26% in fiscal 2017 primarily due to a decline in the line item reduction caused by the obsoleting of tin leaded assembly material in one of the CPLD devices, for which shipments predominately occurred in fiscal 2016 but did not recur in fiscal 2017. Revenue in Europe increased 8% in fiscal 2016 primarily due to line item reduction and CPLD conversions.


Revenue from the Americas increased 3% in fiscal 2017 primarily due to a patent sale transaction for $18.0 million recognized in fiscal 2017, substantially offset by a decline in the line item reduction and CPLD conversion program, for which shipments predominately occurred in fiscal 2016 but did not recur in fiscal 2017. Revenue from the Americas increased 48% in fiscal 2016 primarily due to line item reduction and CPLD conversions.

Revenue from foreign salesus as a percentage of total revenue was 87%, 88%, and 92% for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Revenue from End Customers

Our top five end customers constituted approximately 26% in fiscal 2017, compared to approximately 27% and 32% in fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively, primarily due to a more diverse customer base.

During fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, no end customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenue. Our largest end customer in fiscal 2017 accounted for approximately 7.3% of total revenue. Our largest end customer in fiscal 2016 accounted for approximately 9.9% of total revenue, while our largest end customer in fiscal 2015 accounted for approximately 9.3% of total revenue.

Revenue from Sell-Through Distributors

Sales through distributors have historically accounted for a significant portion of our total revenue. Revenue attributable to resale of products by sell-through distributors as a percentage of total revenue is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended
 December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
Arrow Electronics Inc.24% 24% 20%
Weikeng Group27
 22
 12
All others15
 15
 13
All sell-through distributors66% 61% 45%

Revenue attributable to revenue streams other than sell-through distributors decreased in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, resulting in increases in sell-through distribution revenue as a percentage of total revenue. Revenue from sell-through distributors as a percent of total revenue increased in fiscal 2016 primarily due to an increase in new programmable production volume in consumer mobile devices shipped through a sell-through distributor in 2016, as well as declines in channels other than sell-through distributors from 2015 levels, mainly due to declines in DTV and Home Theater related devices and handset content revenues.

Based on our assessment of the implementation of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), we believe the most significant impact of the new standard will be to accelerate the timing of revenue recognition on product shipments to our sell-through distributors. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, the new guidance would require us to recognize revenue and costs relating to such sales upon shipment to the distributor - subject to reductions for estimated reserves for price adjustments and returns - rather than upon the ultimate sale by the distributor to its end customer, as is our current practice. The impact of this change will depend primarily on the level of inventory held by sell-through distributors at the beginning and end of each period. To the extent these inventory levels fluctuate significantly, revenue under the new standard could be materially different than that under the current standard. We anticipate the adoption of the new standard to increase revenue from sell-through distributors for fiscal 2018 in the $5 million to $10 million range.

Gross margin

The composition of our gross margin, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended
(In thousands)December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
Gross margin$216,579
 $246,434
 $219,909
Percentage of revenue56.1% 57.7% 54.2%
Product gross margin %53.8% 53.9% 49.9%
Licensing and services gross margin %84.0% 98.2% 96.9%

Gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, decreased 1.6 percentage points from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 primarily due to the decrease in licensing and services gross margin, which decreased 14.2 percentage points from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017. This was primarily due to the $18.0 million patent sale in fiscal 2017. The costs associated with the patent sale of $3.6 million, primarily the net book value of the patents acquired in our acquisition of Silicon Image, were greater than usual for this category and had a substantial impact on licensing and services gross margin.

Gross margin and Product gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, increased 3.5 and 4.0 percentage points, respectively, from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016. Of this increase, approximately 2.5 percentage points was due to product cost reductions from lower overhead burden rates, reduced wafer and packaging costs, and improved yields. Approximately another 1.5 percentage points of the increase was due to the reduced amortization in the current year of purchase price accounting adjustments (now completed) associated with the sell-through of acquired inventory and deferred revenue. These increases were partially offset by a less favorable product and customer mix.

Because of its higher margin, the licensing and services portion of our overall revenue can have a disproportionate impact on gross margin and profitability. For programmable and standard products, we expect that product, end market, and customer mix will subject our gross margin to fluctuation, while we expect downward pressure on average selling price to adversely affect our gross margin in the future. If we are unable to realize additional or sufficient product cost reductions in the future to balance changes in product and customer mix, we may experience degradation in our product gross margin.

Operating Expenses

Research and development expense

The composition of our research and development expenses, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Research and development$103,357
 $117,518
 $136,868
 (12.1)% (14.1)%
Percentage of revenue26.8% 27.5% 33.7%    
Mask costs included in Research and development$931
 $3,328
 $5,770
 (72.0)% (42.3)%

Research and development expense includes costs for compensation and benefits, stock compensation, development masks, engineering wafers, depreciation, licenses, and outside engineering services. These expenditures are for the design of new products, IP cores, processes, packaging, and software to support new products.

We believe that a continued commitment to research and development is essential to maintaining product leadership and providing innovative new product offerings and, therefore, we expect to continue to make significant future investments in research and development.

The decrease in research and development expense for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 is due mainly to the cost reductions realized from the restructuring actions and integration of operations undertaken since the acquisition of Silicon Image, including the sales of assets and business units. These savings were predominantly from headcount reductions and site consolidations. Additionally, we saw reduced mask, wafer, and assembly costs, and depreciation expense, partially offset by higher bonus and IP insourcing expenses

The decrease in research and development expense for fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 is due mainly to significantly reduced headcount expenses and, to a lesser extent, reduced mask and wafer costs, lab supplies, time-based licenses, and outside services.


Selling, general, and administrative expense

The composition of our selling, general and administrative expenses, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Selling, general, and administrative$90,718
 $98,602
 $97,349
 (8.0)% 1.3%
Percentage of revenue23.5% 23.1% 24.0%    

Selling, general, and administrative expense includes costs for compensation and benefits related to selling, general, and administrative employees, commissions, depreciation, professional and outside services, trade show, and travel expenses.

The decrease in selling, general, and administrative expense for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 was due mainly to lower bad debt expense in 2017. We also saw lower legal and accounting fees that were partially offset by increased bonus, travel, and depreciation expenses.

The increase in selling, general, and administrative expense for fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 was due mainly to an increase in bad debt expense related to the bankruptcy of one of our distributor groups, substantially offset by the decrease in expenses due to restructuring and integration of operations undertaken since the acquisition of Silicon Image, predominantly headcount reductions and site consolidations.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets

The composition of our amortization of acquired intangible assets, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Amortization of acquired intangible assets$31,340
 $33,575
 $29,580
 (6.7)% 13.5%
Percentage of revenue8.1% 7.9% 7.3%    

For fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, amortization of acquired intangible assets decreased due to the reduction of certain intangibles as a result of impairment charges, patent sales, and sale of the Qterics business unit, partially offset by additional amortization due to the completion of certain in-process research and development projects acquired from Silicon Image.

For fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, amortization of acquired intangible assets increased due to the inclusion of additional amortization expense from new intangible assets acquired in connection with our acquisition of Silicon Image for the full year of fiscal 2016 relative to only an approximately 10-month period in fiscal 2015, partially offset by the reduction of certain intangibles as a result of impairment charges in late 2015, and the sale of Qterics in April 2016.

Restructuring charges

The composition of our restructuring charges, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Restructuring charges$7,196
 $9,267
 $19,239
 (22.3)% (51.8)%
Percentage of revenue1.9% 2.2% 4.7%    

Restructuring charges include expenses resulting from reductions in our worldwide workforce, consolidation of our facilities, and cancellation of software contracts and engineering tools.


In March 2015, our Board of Directors approved an internal restructuring plan (the "March 2015 Plan"), in connection with our acquisition of Silicon Image. The March 2015 Plan was designed to realize synergies from the acquisition by eliminating redundancies created as a result of combining the two companies. The March 2015 Plan is substantially complete, subject to certain remaining expected costs that we do not expect to be material and any changes in sublease assumptions should they occur, which will be expensed as incurred. Approximately $20.5 million of total expense has been incurred through December 30, 2017 under the Mach 2015 Plan, and we believe this amount approximates the total costs expected.

In September 2015, we implemented a further reduction of our worldwide workforce (the "September 2015 Reduction") separate from the March 2015 Plan. The September 2015 Reduction was designed to resize the company in line with the market environment and to better balance our workforce with the long-term strategic needs of our business. The September 2015 Reduction is substantially complete, subject to certain remaining expected costs that we do not expect to be material, which will be expensed as incurred. Approximately $7.2 million of total expense has been incurred through December 30, 2017 under the September 2015 Reduction, and we believe this amount approximates the total costs expected.

In June 2017, our Board of Directors approved an additional internal restructuring plan (the "June 2017 Plan"), which included the sale of 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiary and certain assets related to our Simplay Labs testing and certification business, a worldwide workforce reduction, and an initiative to reduce our infrastructure costs. These actions are part of an overall plan to achieve financial targets and to enhance our financial and competitive position by better aligning our revenue and operating expenses. Approximately $8.0 million of total expense has been incurred through December 30, 2017 under the June 2017 Plan, and we expect the total cost to be approximately $8.0 million to $19.0 million.

The $2.1 million decrease in restructuring expense from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 is primarily the result of significant lease restructuring charges in the prior year related to the March 2015 Plan versus a significantly smaller charge in the current year under the June 2017 Plan. Increased systems restructuring charges in fiscal year 2017 were substantially offset by reduced severance and other restructuring charges.

The $10.0 million decrease in restructuring expense from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 is primarily the result of decreased headcount related restructuring charges in the current year slightly offset by an incremental net charge in the fourth quarter of 2016 to terminate the lease for our Sunnyvale site.

Acquisition related charges

The composition of our acquisition related charges, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Acquisition related charges$3,781
 $6,305
 $22,450
 (40.0)% (71.9)%
Percentage of revenue1.0% 1.5% 5.5%    

Acquisition related charges includes severance and professional fees directly related to acquisitions.

For fiscal 2017 and 2016, Acquisition related charges were entirely attributable to legal fees and outside services in connection with our proposed acquisition by Canyon Bridge Acquisition Company, Inc.

For fiscal 2015, acquisition related charges were entirely attributable to our acquisition of Silicon Image in March 2015 and were comprised of professional services including legal, accounting, licenses and fees, and severance and stock compensation costs related to change of control payments to departing executives. Charges related to the acquisition of Silicon Image were substantially completed as of January 2, 2016.

Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets

The composition of our Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets$32,431
 $7,866
 $21,655
 +100% (63.7)%
Percentage of revenue8.4% 1.8% 5.3%    


In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we updated our annual strategic long-range plan, which resulted in revised forecasts. We also sold 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiary and certain assets related to our Simplay Labs testing and certification business to an unrelated third party. We determined that these activities constituted impairment indicators related to the developed technology intangible assets acquired in our acquisition of Silicon Image. Our assessment of the fair value of these intangible assets concluded that they had been impaired as of September 30, 2017, and we recorded a preliminary $36.2 million impairment charge in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed our detailed analysis and evaluation of the information and assumptions used in the determination of the impairment charge, which included reviewing information, inputs, assumptions, and valuation methodologies used to estimate the fair value of these intangible assets, and finalization of review by an independent valuation expert. As a result, we recorded a $3.8 million reduction to the preliminary impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, for a net impairment charge of $32.4 million in fiscal 2017. No impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded in fiscal 2017 as no indicators of impairment were present.

In September 2016, the foundersmember of the HDMI consortium, ("Founders"),with collection dependent on events other than the passage of which we are a member, updated the Founders Agreementtime, such as partcollection of a regular amendment process resulting in changes to our role as agent forlicenses and royalties from customers by the HDMI consortium and tolicensing agent. The balance results primarily from the model for sharing adopter fee revenues. Under the termsamount of the amendment agreement, our role as the agent was terminated effective January 1, 2017 and a new independent entity was appointed to act as the new HDMI licensing agent with responsibility for licensing and the distribution of royalties among Founders. As a result of the amended model for sharingestimated revenue we will be entitled to a reduced share of adopter fees paid by parties adopting the HDMI standard. We determined that this modification constituted an impairment indicator related to HDMI that we have recognized to date, but which has not yet been collected by the intangibleagent. Contract assets acquired in the Silicon Image acquisition associated with future HDMI adopter fees. Our assessment of the fair value of these intangible assets concluded that they had been impaired as of October 1, 2016, and we recorded a $7.9 million impairment charge in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No impairment charges related to goodwill wereare recorded in fiscal 2016 as no indicators of impairment were present.

For fiscal 2015, the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets was related to Qterics, Inc., which was acquired in the March 2015 acquisition of Silicon Image. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we determined that we experienced an impairment indicator related to the long-lived assets of the Qterics operating segment. For purposes of testing for impairment in fiscal 2015, the Company operated as two reporting units: the continuing core Lattice ("Core") business, which includes intellectual property and semiconductor devices, and Qterics, which was a discrete software-as-a-service business unit in the Lattice legal entity structure until it was sold in April 2016. Although these two operating segments constituted two reportable segments in fiscal 2015, we combined Qterics with our Core business and reported them together as one reportable segment due to the immaterial nature of the Qterics segment. Following this assessment, we concluded that goodwill and intangible assets had been impaired in the Qterics segment as of January 2, 2016. As a result, we recorded impairment charges amounting to $21.7 million, or approximately 92% of the previous value of goodwill and intangible assets, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended January 2, 2016, comprising $12.7 million pertaining to goodwill, $3.9 million pertaining to developed technology, and $5.1 million pertaining to customer relationships. The valuation was based on the market approach and was our best estimate of fair value as of the end of fiscal 2015. No impairment charges were recorded for the Core segment in fiscal 2015.

Gain on sale of building

In August 2017, we sold building space which we owned in Shanghai, China. The building space was vacated in fiscal 2015, upon consolidation of facilities to a single, alternate site in Shanghai following our acquisition of Silicon Image, and was sold for gross proceeds of approximately $7.9 million. As of the sale date, the asset had a historical cost of $3.6 million, accumulated depreciation of $1.4 million and we incurred $1.1 million of direct selling costs, resulting in a net gain on sale of $4.6 million, which is presented as Gain on sale of building in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Interest Expense

The composition of our Interest expense, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Interest expense$(18,807) $(20,327) $(18,389) (7.5)% 10.5%
Percentage of revenue(4.9)% (4.8)% (4.5)%    

The decrease in Interest expense for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 was largely driven by the reduction in the principal balance of our long-term debt as a result of the additional principal payments made in the first six months of fiscal 2017.

The increase in interest expense for fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 was primarily driven by the interest expense related to our debt acquired to partially fund the Silicon Image acquisition, which is further discussed in the Credit Arrangements section under Liquidity and Capital Resources. This interest expense is comprised of contractual interest and amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs based on the effective interest method and was recognized for the full year of fiscal 2016 versus only an approximately 10-month period in fiscal 2015. The latter shorter period was the result of the Silicon Image acquisition date late in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

Other (expense) income, net

The composition of our Other (expense) income, net, including as a percentage of revenue, is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended  % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Other (expense) income, net$(3,286) $2,844
 $(1,072) (100+)% 100+%
Percentage of revenue(0.9)% 0.7% (0.3)%    

As of December 30, 2017, we held a 22.7% preferred stock and convertible debt ownership interest in a privately-held company that designs human-computer interaction technology (see "Reclassifications" in Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8). We assessed this investment for impairment as of December 30, 2017 by applying a fair value analysis using a revenue multiple approach. This yielded a fair value for our ownership stake of $2.3 million, which was less than its carrying value at the date of assessment. We determined that this impairment was other-than-temporary and adjusted the carrying value to the fair value. The total impairment adjustments against this cost-investment that we recognized in fiscal 2017 were $1.8 million.

Additionally for fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, Other (expense) income, net is comprised of a $1.8 million loss on the sale of 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiary and certain assets related to our Simplay Labs testing and certification business to an unrelated third party, partially offset by a $0.3 million gain related to the sale of Qterics on an escrow payment received in fiscal 2017.

For fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, the increase in Other (expense) income, net is driven by the $2.6 million gain on the sale of Qterics to an unrelated third party, escrow proceeds received from the sale of assets by Silicon Image prior to our acquisition in 2015, proceeds received from the bankruptcy settlement distribution of a prior customer, all in fiscal 2016, and the loss on sale of assets in the prior year, not recurring in the current year. This was offset by a $1.0 million increase in impairment of a cost-method investment.

Income taxes

The composition of our income tax expense is presented in the following table:
 Year Ended % Change in
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016 2017 2016
Income tax expense$849
 $9,917
 $32,540
 (91.4)% (69.5)%

The decrease in income tax expense in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 is primarily due to the decrease in foreign withholding taxes as a result of the termination of our role as the HDMI agent.

Our overall tax expense for fiscal 2016, compared to fiscal 2015 decreased primarily due to the recording of a valuation allowance in 2015 resulting in an increase to the tax provision of $21 million, not recurring in the current year. In the first quarter of 2015, we completed the acquisition of Silicon Image, Inc. At the time of the acquisition, we evaluated the combined entity's net deferred income taxes, which included an assessment of the cumulative income or loss over the prior three-year period and future periods, to determine if a valuation allowance is required. After considering the impact of the acquisition including interest expensePrepaid expenses and other restructuring expenses, we recorded a valuation allowance on all of our net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets.

We are not currently paying U.S. federal income taxes and do not expect to pay such taxes until we fully utilize our tax net operating loss and credit carryforwards. We expect to pay a nominal amount of state income tax. We are paying foreign income taxes, which are primarily related to withholding taxes on income from foreign royalties, and related to foreign sales and to the cost of operating offshore research and development, marketing, and sales subsidiaries. We accrue interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The inherent uncertainties related to the geographical distribution and relative level of profitability among various high and low tax jurisdictions make it difficult to estimate the impact of the global tax structure on our future effective tax rate.


The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted December 22, 2017, contains provisions that affect Lattice.  Our new U.S. federal tax rate decreased from 35% to 21%. The new limitation on net interest expense will limit current deductibility of some of the interest on our debt although this deduction may be carried forward for utilization in future years. The Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) may result in a minimum tax on our non-U.S. sourced income. To the extent we are required to pay additional taxes under these provisions, we have approximately $350 million in net operating loss carry forwards as of December 31, 2017 available for offset. Adoption of the territorial system concept will facilitate our ability to repatriate future foreign earnings without incurring additional U.S. tax. The new Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (“BEAT”), which effectively requires U.S. companies with related non-U.S. persons to pay a minimum amount of U.S. tax, does not apply to us currently as we are below the $500 million revenue threshold.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following sections discuss the effects of changesassets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the effects of our credit arrangements and contractual obligations on our liquidity and capital resources, our share repurchase program, as well as our non-GAAP measures.

We classify our marketable securities as short-term based on their nature and availability for use in current operations. Our cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities consist primarily of high quality, investment-grade securities.

We have historically financed our operating and capital resource requirements through cash flows from operations. Cash provided by or used in operating activities will fluctuate from period to period due to fluctuations in operating results, the timing and collection of accounts receivable, and required inventory levels, among other things.

We believe that our financial resources will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs through at least the next 12 months. As of December 30, 2017, we did not have significant long-term commitments for capital expenditures. In the future, and to the extent our Credit Agreement permits, we may continue to consider acquisition opportunities to further extend our product or technology portfolios and further expand our product offerings. In connection with funding capital expenditures, completing other acquisitions, securing additional wafer supply, or increasing our working capital, we may seek to obtain equity or additional debt financing, or advance purchase payments or similar arrangements with wafer manufacturers. We may also need to obtain equity or additional debt financing if we experience downturns or cyclical fluctuations in our business that are more severe or longer than we anticipated when determining our current working capital needs, which financing may now be more difficult to obtain in light of our indebtedness related to the Credit Agreement.

Liquidity

Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term marketable securities
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ Change
Cash and cash equivalents$106,815
 $106,552
 $263
Short-term marketable securities4,982
 10,308
 (5,326)
Total Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term marketable securities$111,797
 $116,860
 $(5,063)

As of December 30, 2017, we had total Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term marketable securities of $111.8 million, of which approximately $89.9 million in Cash and cash equivalents was held by our foreign subsidiaries. We manage our global cash requirements considering (i) available funds among the subsidiaries through which we conduct business, (ii) the geographic location of our liquidity needs, and (iii) the cost to access international cash balances. As of December 30, 2017, we could access all cash held by our foreign subsidiaries without incurring significant additional expense.

The net decrease in Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term marketable securities of $5.1 million between December 31, 2016 and December 30, 2017, was primarily driven by $35.4 million cash used in the repayment of debt and $21.4 million of cash used in capital expenditures and payment for software licenses, offset by $7.9 million of proceeds from the sale of a building, and by $38.5 million in cash provided by operations, which includes a total $18.0 million received from a patent sale transaction.


Accounts receivable, net
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 $Change %Change
Accounts receivable, net$55,104
 $99,637
 $(44,533) (44.7)%
Days sales outstanding - Overall53
 77
 (24)  
Days sales outstanding - Product53
 75
 (22)  
Days sales outstanding - Licensing and services29
 106
 (77)  

Accounts receivable, net as of December 30, 2017 decreased by $44.5 million, or 44.7%, compared to December 31, 2016. A majority of the decrease in receivables was due to a decrease in product billings, net of credits, during the fourth quarter of 2017 mainly to our sell-through customers. There was an inventory buildup at our sell-through distributors during 2017 followed by a return to more normal inventory levels at the end of 2017. This resulted in a decrease in sell-through customer billings and accounts receivable of approximately $25 million at the end of 2017. There was also a reduction of receivables related to licensing and services. The termination of our role as agent for the HDMI consortium accounted for $6.3 million of the decrease, and collections of other licensing and services receivables outstanding at December 31, 2016 contributed another $1.1 million to the reduction in receivables during the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017. Timing of collections and lower 2017 revenues as compared to 2016 contributed to the remaining decrease in receivables.

Overall days sales outstanding at December 30, 2017 was 53 days, a decrease of 24 days from 77 days at December 31, 2016. Days sales outstanding at December 30, 2017 related to Product revenue was 53 days, a decrease of 22 days from 75 days at December 31, 2016, as a result of the decrease in sell-through distributor billings described above. Days sales outstanding at December 30, 2017 related to Licensing and services revenue was 29 days, a decrease of 77 days from 106 days at December 31, 2016, as a result of a decrease in HDMI related receivables during the year ended December 30, 2017 due to the termination of our role as agent for the HDMI consortium.

Inventories
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 $Change %Change
Inventories$79,903
 $79,168
 $735
 0.9%
Months of inventory on hand5.4
 4.3
 1.1
  

Inventories as of December 30, 2017 increased $0.7 million, or 0.9%, compared to December 31, 2016, primarily to support forecasted sales for various product lines and new product demand. This increase was substantially offset by an inventory decline related to the ramp down of a major consumer product's sales program.

The months of inventory on hand ratio compares the inventory balance at the end of a period to the cost of sales in that period. Our months of inventory on hand increased to 5.4 months at December 30, 2017 from 4.3 months at December 31, 2016, as the cost of sales decreased between these periods, while inventory levels remained relatively unchanged due to the reasons mentioned above.

Credit Arrangements

On March 10, 2015, we entered into a secured credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Jefferies Finance, LLC and certain other lenders for purposes of funding, in part, our acquisition of Silicon Image. The Credit Agreement provided for a $350 million term loan (the "Term Loan") maturing on March 10, 2021 (the "Term Loan Maturity Date"). We received $346.5 million, net of an original issue discount of $3.5 million and we paid debt issuance costs of $8.3 million. The Term Loan bears variable interest equal to the one-month LIBOR, subject to a 1.00% floor, plus a spread of 4.25%. The current effective interest rate on the Term Loan is 6.29%.

The Term Loan is payable through a combination of (i) quarterly installments of approximately $0.9 million, (ii) annual excess cash flow payments as defined in the Credit Agreement, which are due 95 days after the last day of our fiscal year, and (iii) any payments due upon certain issuances of additional indebtedness and certain asset dispositions, with any remaining outstanding principal amount due and payable on the Term Loan Maturity Date. The percentage of excess cash flow we are required to pay ranges from 0% to 75%, depending on our leverage and other factors as defined in the Credit Agreement. Currently, the Credit Agreement would require a 75% excess cash flow payment.


In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we made a required additional principal payment of $1.7 million due to the sale of Qterics. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we made a required additional principal payment of $9.9 million due to a sale of patents. In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we made another required additional principal payment of $8.3 million due to a sale of patents, and a required annual excess cash flow payment of $13.7 million. There were no other required principal payments outside of our quarterly installment payments. Over the next twelve months, our principal payments will be comprised mainly of regular quarterly installments. We have determined that the annual excess cash flow payment required in fiscal 2018, as calculated according to the Credit Agreement, is not material to our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 30, 2017.

While the Credit Agreement does not contain financial covenants, it does contain informational covenants and certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on liens, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, payment of dividends, and indebtedness. We were in compliance with all such covenants at December 30, 2017.

As of December 30, 2017, we had no significant long-term purchase commitments for capital expenditures or existing used or unused credit arrangements.

Share Repurchase Program

We did not repurchase any shares in either fiscal year 2017 or 2016. We most recently repurchased shares in fiscal year 2015 under a stock repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors on March 3, 2014. This 2014 program authorized the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of outstanding common stock from time to time over a period of twelve months. The 2014 program completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2015, during which approximately 1.1 million shares were repurchased for approximately $7.0 million. All shares repurchased in fiscal 2015 under the 2014 program were retired during fiscal 2015 (see our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity). All repurchases were open market transactions funded from available working capital.

Contractual Cash Obligations

Sheets.

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations at December 30, 2017:

(In thousands)   
Fiscal year Operating leases (1)Long-term Debt (2)
2018 $6,310
$20,027
2019 4,784
41,366
2020 4,860
71,849
2021 4,654
219,966
2022 4,694

Thereafter 14,259

  $39,561
$353,208

(1) Certain of our facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases, which expire at various times through 2026.

(2) Cash payments due for long-term debt include estimated interest payments, which are based on outstanding principal amounts, currently effective interest rates as of December 30, 2017, timing of scheduled payments andactivity during the debt term. See Liquidity section of Item 7 for further discussion pertaining to our Credit Arrangements.

Our significant operating leases are for our facilities in Portland and Hillsboro, Oregon; San Jose, California; Muntinlupa City, Philippines; and Shanghai, China. We also had a significant lease for a facility in Sunnyvale, California which was terminated in February 2017.

In November 2014, we entered into a lease for a new corporate headquarters facility in Portland, Oregon which expires in March 2025. Annual rental costs are estimated at $0.7 million with average annual increases of approximately 5%. We commenced operations at the new headquarters location in March 2015. In November 2014, we sold the property where our headquarters was formerly located in Hillsboro, Oregon for net proceeds of $14.6 million. We leased back the majority of this facility from November 2014 until March 2015, after which we leased a smaller portion of the facility until November 2022. Annual rental costs are estimated at $0.5 million with 3% annual increases.

Our lease in San Jose, California expires September 2026 with total annual rental costs estimated to be $2.3 million and annual increases of approximately 3%. Two of our leases in Muntinlupa City, Philippines expire in May 2025 and June 2025, with total annual rental costs estimated to be $0.7 million and annual increases of approximately 5%. Our lease in Shanghai expires in May 2018, with remaining rental costs estimated to be $1.1 million. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the non-cancelable lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets.


New Accounting Pronouncements

The information contained under the heading "New Accounting Pronouncements" in Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 7.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 30, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement our consolidated financial results presented in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), we also present non-GAAP financial measures which are adjusted from the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP measures set forth below exclude charges and adjustments primarily related to stock-based compensation, restructuring charges, acquisition-related charges, amortization of acquired intangible assets, impairment of intangible assets, purchase accounting adjustments, gain on sale of building, gain or loss on sale of business unit, and the estimated tax effect of these items. These charges and adjustments may be nonrecurring in nature but are a result of periodic or non-core operating activities of the company.

Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide an additional and useful way of viewing aspects of our performance that, when viewed in conjunction with our U.S. GAAP results, provide a more comprehensive understanding of the various factors and trends affecting our ongoing financial performance and operating results than GAAP measures alone. In particular, investors may find the non-GAAP measures useful in reviewing our operating performance without the significant accounting charges resulting from the Silicon Image acquisition, alongside the comparably adjusted prior year results. Management also uses these non-GAAP measures for strategic and business decision-making, internal budgeting, forecasting, and resource allocation processes and believes that investors should have access to similar data when making their investment decisions. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate management’s internal comparisons to our historical operating results and comparisons to competitors’ operating results.

These non-GAAP measuresperiods presented:

(In thousands)

    

Contract assets as of January 2, 2021

 $5,611 

Revenues recorded during the period

  15,587 

Transferred to Accounts receivable or collected

  (15,526)

Contract assets as of January 1, 2022

 $5,672 

Revenues recorded during the period

  15,848 

Transferred to Accounts receivable or collected

  (14,173)

Contract assets as of December 31, 2022

 $7,347 

Contract liabilities are included solely for informational and comparative purposes and are not meant as a substitute for GAAP and should be considered together with the consolidated financial information located in this report. Pursuant to the requirements of Regulation S-K and to make clear to our investors the adjustments we make to U.S. GAAP measures, we have provided the following reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures.



Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures

(In thousands, except per share amounts)Year Ended
(unaudited)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
      
Revenue Reconciliation     
GAAP Revenue$385,961
 $427,054
 $405,966
Acquisition related deferred revenue effect (1)
 
 5,187
Non-GAAP Revenue$385,961
 $427,054
 $411,153
      
Gross Margin Reconciliation     
GAAP Gross margin$216,579
 $246,434
 $219,909
Acquisition related net deferred revenue effect (1) (2)
 
 3,691
Acquisition related inventory fair value effect (3)
 523
 6,078
Stock-based compensation expense - gross margin788
 888
 1,416
Non-GAAP Gross margin$217,367
 $247,845
 $231,094
      
Gross Margin % Reconciliation     
GAAP Gross margin %56.1 % 57.7 % 54.2 %
Cumulative effect of non-GAAP Gross Margin adjustments0.2 % 0.3 % 2.0 %
Non-GAAP Gross margin %56.3 % 58.0 % 56.2 %
      
Operating Expenses Reconciliation     
GAAP Operating expenses$264,199
 $273,133
 $327,141
Amortization of acquired intangible assets(31,340) (33,575) (29,580)
Restructuring charges(7,196) (9,267) (19,239)
Acquisition related charges (4)(3,781) (6,305) (22,450)
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets(32,431) (7,866) (21,655)
Stock-based compensation expense - operations(11,755) (15,325) (15,934)
Gain on sale of building4,624
 
 
Non-GAAP Operating expenses$182,320
 $200,795
 $218,283
      
(Loss) Income from Operations Reconciliation     
GAAP Loss from operations$(47,620) $(26,699) $(107,232)
Acquisition related net deferred revenue effect (1) (2)
 
 3,691
Acquisition related inventory fair value effect (3)
 523
 6,078
Stock-based compensation expense - gross margin788
 888
 1,416
Amortization of acquired intangible assets31,340
 33,575
 29,580
Restructuring charges7,196
 9,267
 19,239
Acquisition related charges (4)3,781
 6,305
 22,450
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets32,431
 7,866
 21,655
Stock-based compensation expense - operations11,755
 15,325
 15,934
Gain on sale of building(4,624) 
 
Non-GAAP Income from operations$35,047
 $47,050
 $12,811
      
(1) Fair value adjustment to deferred revenue from purchase accounting
(2) Fair value adjustment to deferred cost of sales from purchase accounting
(3) Fair value adjustment for inventory step-up from purchase accounting
(4) Includes legal fees and outside services that were related to our proposed acquisition by Canyon Bridge Acquisition Company, Inc.
     and stock-based compensation and severance costs related to change in control.

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Year Ended
(unaudited)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
      
(Loss) Income from Operations % Reconciliation     
GAAP Loss from operations %(12.3)% (6.3)% (26.4)%
Cumulative effect of non-GAAP Gross Margin and Operating adjustments21.4 % 17.3 % 29.5 %
Non-GAAP Income from operations %9.1 % 11.0 % 3.1 %
      
Other (Expense) Income, Net Reconciliation     
 GAAP Other (expense) income, net$(3,286) $2,844
 $(1,072)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets and business units1,496
 (2,646) 
 Non-GAAP Other income (expense), net$(1,790) $198
 $(1,072)
      
Income Tax Expense Reconciliation     
GAAP Income tax expense$849
 $9,917
 $32,540
Estimated tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (5)
 
 (21,030)
Non-GAAP Income tax expense$849
 $9,917
 $11,510
      
Net (Loss) Income Reconciliation     
GAAP Net loss$(70,562) $(54,099) $(159,233)
Acquisition related net deferred revenue effect (1) (2)
 
 3,691
Acquisition related inventory fair value effect (3)
 523
 6,078
Stock-based compensation expense - gross margin788
 888
 1,416
Amortization of acquired intangible assets31,340
 33,575
 29,580
Restructuring charges7,196
 9,267
 19,239
Acquisition related charges (4)3,781
 6,305
 22,450
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets32,431
 7,866
 21,655
Stock-based compensation expense - operating expense11,755
 15,325
 15,934
Gain on sale of building(4,624) 
 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets and business units1,496
 (2,646) 
Estimated tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (5)
 
 21,030
Non-GAAP Net income (loss)$13,601
 $17,004
 $(18,160)
      
(1) Fair value adjustment to deferred revenue from purchase accounting
(2) Fair value adjustment to deferred cost of sales from purchase accounting
(3) Fair value adjustment for inventory step-up from purchase accounting
(4) Includes legal fees and outside services that were related to our proposed acquisition by Canyon Bridge Acquisition Company, Inc.
and stock-based compensation and severance costs related to change in control.
(5) We calculate non-GAAP tax expense by applying our tax provision model to year-to-date and projected
income after adjusting for non-GAAP items. The difference between calculated values for GAAP and
non-GAAP tax expense has been included as the “Estimated tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments.”

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Year Ended
(unaudited)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
      
Net (Loss) Income Per Share Reconciliation     
GAAP Net loss per share - basic and diluted$(0.58) $(0.45) $(1.36)
Cumulative effect of Non-GAAP adjustments0.69
 0.59
 1.21
Non-GAAP Net income (loss) per share - basic and diluted$0.11
 $0.14
 $(0.15)
      
Shares used in per share calculations:     
Basic122,677
 119,994
 117,387
Diluted - GAAP (6)122,677
 119,994
 117,387
Diluted - non-GAAP (6)124,499
 121,957
 117,387
      
(6) Diluted shares are calculated using the GAAP treasury stock method. In a loss position, diluted shares equal basic shares.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We collect an annual Japanese consumption tax refund in yen, and as a result of having various international subsidiary and branch operations, our financial position and results of operations are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

We mitigate the resulting foreign currency exchange rate exposure by entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts, details of which are presented in the following table:
  December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Total cost of contracts for Japanese yen (thousands) $2,204
 $2,323
Number of contracts 2
 2
Settlement month June 2018
 June 2017

Although these hedges mitigate our foreign currency exchange rate exposure from an economic perspective, they were not designated as "effective" hedges under U.S. GAAP and as such are adjusted to fair value through Other (expense) income, net. We do not engage in speculative trading in any financial or capital market.

The net fair value of these contracts was favorable by approximately $0.1 million at December 30, 2017 and favorable by approximately $0.2 million at December 31, 2016. A hypothetical 10% unfavorable exchange rate change in the yen against the U.S. dollar would have resulted in an unfavorable change in net fair value of approximately $0.2 million at both December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Changes in fair value resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations would be substantially offset by the change in value of the underlying hedged transactions.

Interest Rate Risk

At December 30, 2017, we had $306.8 million outstanding on the $350 million gross term loan outstanding under our Credit Agreement, with a variable contractual interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR as of December 30, 2017, subject to a 1.00% floor, plus a spread of 4.25%. A hypothetical increase in the one-month LIBOR by 1% (100 basis points) during fiscal 2017 would have increased our Interest expense by approximately $3.2 million for the twelve month period ended December 30, 2017.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements



LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(In thousands, except share and par value data)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$106,815
 $106,552
Short-term marketable securities4,982
 10,308
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts55,104
 99,637
Inventories79,903
 79,168
Prepaid expenses and other current assets16,567
 19,035
Total current assets263,371
 314,700
Property and equipment, net40,423
 49,481
Intangible assets, net51,308
 118,863
Goodwill267,514
 269,758
Deferred income taxes198
 372
Other long-term assets13,147
 13,709
Total assets$635,961
 $766,883
    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (includes restructuring)$54,405
 $80,933
Accrued payroll obligations10,416
 9,865
Current portion of long-term debt1,508
 33,767
Deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors17,250
 32,257
Deferred licensing and services revenue68
 728
Total current liabilities83,647
 157,550
Long-term debt299,667
 300,855
Other long-term liabilities34,954
 38,048
Total liabilities418,268
 496,453
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 20)
 
Stockholders' equity:   
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 123,895,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 30, 2017 and 121,645,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 20161,239
 1,216
Additional paid-in capital695,768
 680,315
Accumulated deficit(477,862) (406,945)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,452) (4,156)
Total stockholders' equity217,693
 270,430
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$635,961
 $766,883


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS




Year Ended
(In thousands, except per share data)
December 30, 2017 December 31,
2016
 January 2, 2016
Revenue:      
Product $356,502
 $390,704
 $369,200
Licensing and services 29,459
 36,350
 36,766
Total revenue 385,961
 427,054
 405,966
Costs and expenses:      
Cost of product revenue 164,657
 179,983
 184,914
Cost of licensing and services revenue 4,725
 637
 1,143
Research and development 103,357
 117,518
 136,868
Selling, general, and administrative 90,718
 98,602
 97,349
Amortization of acquired intangible assets 31,340
 33,575
 29,580
Restructuring charges 7,196
 9,267
 19,239
Acquisition related charges 3,781
 6,305
 22,450
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets 32,431
 7,866
 21,655
Gain on sale of building (4,624) 
 
Total costs and expenses 433,581
 453,753
 513,198
Loss from operations (47,620) (26,699) (107,232)
Interest expense (18,807) (20,327) (18,389)
Other (expense) income, net (3,286) 2,844
 (1,072)
Loss before income taxes (69,713) (44,182) (126,693)
Income tax expense 849
 9,917
 32,540
Net loss $(70,562) $(54,099) $(159,233)
       
       
Net loss per share, basic and diluted $(0.58) $(0.45) $(1.36)
       
Shares used in per share calculations, basic and diluted 122,677
 119,994
 117,387


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS


  Year Ended
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Net loss $(70,562) $(54,099) $(159,233)
Other comprehensive loss:      
Unrealized loss related to marketable securities, net of tax (73) (172) (69)
Reclassification adjustment for losses related to marketable securities included in other (expense) income 252
 79
 442
Translation adjustment loss, net of tax 2,620
 (1,303) (1,243)
Change in actuarial valuation of defined benefit pension (95) 150
 (156)
Comprehensive loss $(67,858) $(55,345) $(160,259)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 Common Stock
($.01 par value)
 Paid-in
capital
 Treasury
stock
 Accumulated
deficit
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss  
(In thousands, except par value data)Shares Amount     Total
Balances, January 3, 2015117,288
 $1,173
 $635,299
 $
 $(193,613) $(1,884) $440,975
Net loss for 2015
 
 
 
 (159,233) 
 (159,233)
Unrealized loss related to marketable securities, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (69) (69)
Recognized loss on redemption of marketable securities, previously unrealized
 
 
 
 
 442
 442
Translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (1,243) (1,243)
Common stock issued in connection with the exercise of stock options, ESPP and vested RSUs, net of tax2,415
 25
 2,161
 
 
 
 2,186
Stock repurchase
 
 
 (6,970) 
 
 (6,970)
Retirement of treasury stock(1,052) (11) (6,959) 6,970
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation expense related to options, ESPP and RSUs
 
 18,396
 
 
 
 18,396
Fair value of partially vested stock options and RSUs assumed in acquisition
 
 5,139
 
 
 
 5,139
Defined benefit pension, net of actuarial losses
 
 
 
 
 (156) (156)
Redemption of noncontrolling interest, net of previous accretion to redemption value.
 
 6,053
 
 
 
 6,053
Balances, January 2, 2016118,651
 $1,187
 $660,089
 $
 $(352,846) $(2,910) $305,520
Net loss for 2016
 
 
 
 (54,099) 
 (54,099)
Unrealized loss related to marketable securities, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (172) (172)
Recognized loss on redemption of marketable securities, previously unrealized
 
 
 
 
 79
 79
Translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (1,303) (1,303)
Common stock issued in connection with the exercise of stock options, ESPP and vested RSUs, net of tax2,994
 29
 4,013
 
 
 
 4,042
Stock-based compensation expense related to options, ESPP and RSUs
 
 16,213
 
 
 
 16,213
Defined benefit pension, net of actuarial losses
 
 
 
 
 150
 150
Balances, December 31, 2016121,645
 $1,216
 $680,315
 $
 $(406,945) $(4,156) $270,430
Net loss for 2017
 
 
 
 (70,562) 
 (70,562)
Unrealized loss related to marketable securities, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (73) (73)
Recognized loss on redemption of marketable securities, previously unrealized
 
 
 
 
 252
 252
Translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 2,620
 2,620
Common stock issued in connection with the exercise of stock options, ESPP and vested RSUs, net of tax2,250
 23
 2,795
 
 
 
 2,818
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP and RSUs (1)
 
 12,658
 
 
 
 12,658
Defined benefit pension, net of actuarial losses
 
 
 
 
 (95) (95)
Accounting method transition adjustment (2)
 
 
 
 (355) 
 (355)
Balances, December 30, 2017123,895
 $1,239
 $695,768
 $
 $(477,862) $(1,452) $217,693
(1)    In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, in relation to the sale of 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiary and certain assets related to our Simplay
Labs testing and certification business, certain stock compensation was accelerated due to a change of control agreement. As a result of this acceleration,
the equity effect of stock compensation shown above includes approximately $0.1 million that was charged to restructuring expense as part of the June
2017 Plan (see Note 15).
(2)    During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we early adopted ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.
This guidance is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning
of the fiscal year of adoption. As a result of this adoption, we recorded a nominal amount to accumulated deficit, as detailed in the table above.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 Year Ended
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net loss$(70,562) $(54,099) $(159,233)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization57,861
 61,806
 60,808
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets32,431
 7,866
 21,655
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount1,982
 1,350
 2,835
Change in deferred income tax provision(154) 90
 21,367
Loss on sale or maturity of marketable securities252
 79
 333
Gain on forward contracts(77) (184) 
Stock-based compensation expense12,543
 16,213
 18,396
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets(75) 597
 
Gain on sale of building(4,624) 
 
Loss (Gain) on sale of assets and business units1,496
 (2,646) 
Impairment of cost-method investment1,761
 1,459
 492
Changes in assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable, net44,613
 (11,419) 4,578
Inventories(902) (3,272) 9,868
Prepaid expenses and other assets889
 (2,270) (6,710)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (includes restructuring)(23,588) 8,338
 6,301
Accrued payroll obligations726
 402
 (10,202)
Income taxes payable(556) 3,216
 1,749
Deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors(15,007) 14,391
 2,920
Deferred licensing and services revenue(495) (183) 1,958
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities38,514
 41,734
 (22,885)
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Proceeds from sales of and maturities of short-term marketable securities12,689
 14,897
 142,956
Purchase of marketable securities(7,420) (7,490) (15,982)
Cash paid for business acquisition, net of cash acquired
 
 (431,068)
Proceeds from sale of building7,895
 
 
Cash paid for costs of sale of building(1,004) 
 
Capital expenditures(12,855) (16,717) (18,209)
Proceeds from sale of assets and business units, net of cash sold967
 1,972
 
Repayment received on short-term loan to cost-method investee2,000
 
 
Short-term loan to cost-method investee(2,000) 
 
Cash paid for a cost-method investment
 (1,000) (5,000)
Cash paid for software licenses(8,532) (9,035) (9,515)
Net cash used in investing activities$(8,260) $(17,373) $(336,818)
      
      
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
 
      
 Year Ended
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Restricted stock unit withholdings$(3,267) $(3,565) $(3,493)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock6,085
 7,607
 5,679
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 
 346,500
Cash paid for debt issuance costs
 
 (8,283)
Repayment of debt(35,429) (5,154) (2,625)
Purchase of treasury stock
 
 (6,970)
Cash paid to redeem noncontrolling interest
 
 (867)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities$(32,611) $(1,112) $329,941
Effect of exchange rate change on cash$2,620
 $(1,303) $(1,243)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents263
 21,946
 (31,005)
Beginning cash and cash equivalents106,552
 84,606
 115,611
Ending cash and cash equivalents$106,815
 $106,552
 $84,606
      
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Change in unrealized loss related to marketable securities, net of tax, included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss$73
 $172
 $69
Income taxes paid, net of refunds$2,387
 $9,359
 $8,339
Interest paid$20,649
 $18,159
 $11,071
Accrued purchases of property and equipment$588
 $1,028
 $1,277
Note receivable resulting from sale of assets and business units$3,050
 $
 $
Transfer of residual temporary equity to additional paid-in capital on redemption of noncontrolling interest$
 $
 $6,773



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Lattice Semiconductor (“Lattice,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a Delaware company that develops semiconductor technologies that we monetize through products, solutions, and licenses. We engage in smart connectivity solutions, providing intellectual property ("IP") and low-power, small form-factor devices that enable global customers to quickly and easily develop innovative, smart, and connected products. Our broad end-market exposure extends from mobile devices and consumer electronics to industrial and automotive equipment, communications and computing infrastructure, and licensing.

We do not manufacture our own silicon wafers. We maintain strategic relationships with large, established semiconductor foundries located in Asia to source our finished silicon wafers. In addition, all of our assembly operations and most of our test and logistics operations are performed by outside suppliers located in Asia. We perform certain test operations and reliability and quality assurance processes internally.

We place substantial emphasis on new product development and believe that continued investment in this area is required to maintain and improve our competitive position. Our product development activities emphasize new proprietary products, advanced packaging, enhancement of existing products and process technologies, and improvement of software development tools. Research and development activities occur primarily in: Hillsboro, Oregon; San Jose, California; Shanghai, China; and Muntinlupa City, Philippines.

Fiscal Reporting Period

We report based on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. Our fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015 were 52-week years that ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and January 2, 2016 respectively. Our fiscal 2018 will be a 52-week year and will end on December 29, 2018. All references to quarterly or yearly financial results are references to the results for the relevant fiscal period.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Lattice and its subsidiaries after the elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in prior fiscal years in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in the current fiscal year. These reclassifications had no material effect on the results of operations or financial position for any period presented. We had previously treated an investment as an equity-method investment and reported equity in net loss of an unconsolidated affiliate separately, amounting to approximately $1.5 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively. We have reclassified the prior year losses to Other (expense) income, net on our Consolidated Statements of Income to be consistent with the current year treatment of the investment as a cost-method investment.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and classification of assets, such as marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, goodwill (including the assessment of reporting unit), intangible assets, current and deferred income taxes, accruedAccrued liabilities (including restructuring charges and bonus arrangements), deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, amounts used in acquisition valuations and purchase accounting, impairment assessments, and the reported amounts of product revenue, licensing and services revenue, and expenses during the fiscal periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

We consider all investments that are readily convertible into cash and that have original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of highly liquid investments in time deposits or money market accounts and are carried at cost. We account for marketable securities as available-for-sale investments, as defined by U.S. GAAP, and record unrealized gains or losses to Accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, unless losses are considered other than temporary, in which case, those are recorded directly to the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss. Deposits with financial institutions at times exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We invest in various financial instruments, which may include corporate and government bonds, notes, and commercial paper. We value these instruments at their fair value and monitor our portfolio for impairment on a periodic basis. In the event that the carrying value of an investment exceeds its fair value and the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, we would record an impairment charge and establish a new carrying value. We assess other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements.” The framework under the provisions of ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Each level of input has different levels of subjectivity and difficulty involved in determining fair value.

Level 1instruments generally represent quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Therefore, determining fair value for Level 1 instruments generally does not require significant management judgment, and the estimation is not difficult. Our Level 1 instruments consist of U.S. Government agency obligations, corporate notes and bonds, and commercial paper that are traded in active markets and are classified as Short-term marketable securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Level 2instruments include inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical instruments in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Our Level 2 instruments consist of certificates of deposit and foreign currency exchange contracts, entered into to hedge against fluctuation in the Japanese yen.

Level 3 instruments include unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market The following table summarizes activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. As a result, the determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires significant management judgment and subjectivity. We did not have any Level 3 instruments during the periods presented.presented:

(In thousands)

    

Contract liabilities as of January 2, 2021

 $3,068 

Accruals for estimated future stock rotation and scrap returns

  4,613 

Less: Release of accruals for recognized stock rotation and scrap returns

  (2,913)

Contract liabilities as of January 1, 2022

 $4,768 

Prepaid customer deposit

  12,811 

Accruals for estimated future stock rotation and scrap returns

  6,142 

Less: Release of accruals for recognized stock rotation and scrap returns

  (6,055)

Contract liabilities as of December 31, 2022

 $17,666 

45


  December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Total cost of contracts for Japanese yen (in thousands)
 $2,204
 $2,323
Number of contracts 2
 2
Settlement month June 2018
 June 2017


Although these hedges mitigate our foreign currency exchange rate exposure from an economic perspective, they were not designated as "effective" hedges under U.S. GAAP and as such are adjusted to fair value through Other (expense) income, net, with gains of approximately $0.1 million and approximately $0.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Concentration Risk

Potential exposure to concentration risk may impact revenue, trade receivables, marketable securities, and supply of wafers for our new products.

Customer concentration risk may impact revenue. The percentage of total revenue attributable to our top five end customers and largest end customer is presented in the following table:
  Year Ended
  December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
Revenue attributable to top five end customers 26% 27% 32%
Revenue attributable to largest end customer 7.3% 9.9% 9.3%

No end customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenue during these periods.

Sales through distributors have historically accounted for a significant portion of our total revenue. Revenue attributable to resale of products by sell-through distributors as a percentage of total revenue is presented in the following table:
  Year Ended
  December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
Revenue attributable to sell-through distributors 66% 61% 45%

Our largest distributor groups also account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables. At December 30, 2017, one distributor group accounted for 54% of gross trade receivables. At December 31, 2016, two distributor groups accounted for 38% and 24%, respectively, of gross trade receivables. No other distributor group or end customer accounted for more than 10% of gross trade receivables at these dates.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is mitigated by our credit and collection process including active management of collections, credit limits, routine credit evaluations for essentially all customers, and secure transactions with letters of credit or advance payments where appropriate. We regularly review our allowance for doubtful accounts and the aging of our accounts receivable.

Note 4 - Balance Sheet Components

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable do not bear interest and are shown net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $9.4 million and $9.3 million at December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Thean allowance for doubtful accountsexpected lifetime credit losses, which reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. We determine thethis allowance based onthrough an assessment of known troubled accounts, analysis of the aging of our accounts receivable aging, historical experience, expectations for future economic conditions, management judgment, and other currently available evidence.

  

December 31,

  

January 1,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

 

Accounts receivable

 $94,018  $79,859 

Less: Allowance for credit losses

      

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses

 $94,018  $79,859 

We write off accounts receivable against the allowance when we determine a balance is uncollectible and had no longer actively pursue collection of the receivable. The amounts of accounts receivable written off were insignificant for all periods presented. Bad debt expense was negligible for fiscal 2017. During fiscal 2016, we recorded a full allowance on our accounts receivable, net of deferred revenue, from a bankrupt distributor group resulting in an increase in allowance for doubtful accounts of $9.0 million and material bad debt expense of $7.5 million in that year.


We place our investments primarily through one financial institution and mitigate the concentration of credit risk by limiting the maximum portion of the investment portfolio which may be investedfiscal 2022,2021, or 2020.

Inventories

  

December 31,

  

January 1,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

 

Work in progress

 $58,269  $43,546 

Finished goods

  52,106   24,048 

Total inventories, net

 $110,375  $67,594 

Accrued Liabilities

Included in any one instrument. Our investment policy defines approved credit ratings for investment securities. Investments on-hand in marketable securities consisted primarily of money market instruments, “AA” or better corporate notes and bonds and commercial paper, and U.S. government agency obligations. See Note 3 for a discussion of the liquidity attributes of our marketable securities.


We rely on a limited number of foundries for our wafer purchases including Fujitsu Limited, Seiko Epson Corporation, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd, and United Microelectronics Corporation. We seek to mitigate the concentration of supply risk by establishing, maintaining and managing multiple foundry relationships; however, certain of our products are sourced from a single foundry and changing from one foundry to another can have a significant cost.


Revenue Recognition and Deferred Income

The following describes our revenue recognition policy during fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2018, we will adopt ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). See "New Accounting Pronouncements" later in this Note 1 for a discussion of the impact of adoption on our revenue recognition.

Product Revenue

We sell our products though several channels: directly to end customers, through a network of independent manufacturers' representatives, and indirectly through a network of independent sell-in and sell-through distributors. Distributors provide periodic data regarding the product, price, quantity, and end customer when products are resold, as well as the quantities of our products they still have in stock.

Revenue from sales to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") and sell-in distributors is generally recognized upon shipment. Reserves for sell-in stock rotations, where applicable, are estimated based primarily on historical experience and provided for at the time of shipment. Revenue from sales by our sell-through distributors is recognized at the time of reported resale. Under both types of revenue recognition, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title has transferred, collection of resulting receivables is reasonably assured, and there are no remaining customer acceptance requirements and no remaining significant performance obligations.

Orders from our sell-through distributors are initially recorded at published list prices; however, for a majority of our sales, the final selling price is determined at the time of resale and in accordance with a distributor price agreement. For this reason, we do not recognize revenue until products are resold by sell-through distributors to an end customer. In certain circumstances, we allow sell-through distributors to return unsold products. At times, we protect our sell-through distributors against reductions in published list prices.

At the time of shipment to sell-through distributors, we (a) record accounts receivable at published list price since there is a legally enforceable obligation from the distributor to pay us currently for product delivered, (b) relieve inventory for the carrying value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributor, and (c) record deferred revenue and deferred cost of sales in Deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors in the liability section of our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Revenue and cost of sales to sell-through distributors are deferred until either the product is resold by the distributor or, in certain cases, return privileges terminate, at which time Revenue and Cost of product revenue are reflected in Net loss in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and Accounts receivable, net is adjusted to reflect the final selling price.

The components of Deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors are presented in the following table:
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Inventory valued at published list price and held by sell-through distributors with right of return $74,788
 $86,218
Allowance for distributor advances (44,990) (37,090)
Deferred cost of sales related to inventory held by sell-through distributors (12,548) (16,871)
Total Deferred income and allowances on sales to sell-through distributors $17,250
 $32,257

Licensing and Services Revenue

Our licensing and services revenue is comprised of revenue from our intellectual property ("IP") core licensing activity, patent monetization activities, and royalty and adopter fee revenue from our standards activities. These activities are complementary to our product sales and help us monetize our IP and accelerate market adoption curves associated with our technology and standards.

From time to time we enter into patent sale and licensing agreements to monetize and license a broad portfolio of our patented inventions. Such licensing agreements may include upfront license fees and ongoing royalties. The contractual terms of the agreements generally provide for payments of upfront license fees and/or royalties over an extended period of time. Revenue from such license fees is recognized when payments become due and payable as long as all other revenue recognition criteria are met, while revenue from royalties is recognized when reported to us by customers.

We enter into IP licensing agreements that generally provide licensees the right to incorporate our IP components into their products pursuant to terms and conditions that vary by licensee. Revenue earned under these agreements is classified as Licensing and services revenue. Our IP licensing agreements generally include multiple elements, which may include one or more off-the-shelf or customized IP licenses bundled with support services covering a fixed period of time, generally one year. If the different elements of a multiple-element arrangement qualify as separate units of accounting, we allocate the total arrangement consideration to each element based on relative selling price.


Amounts allocated to off-the-shelf IP licenses are recognized at the time of sale provided the other conditions for revenue recognition have been met. Amounts allocated to the support services are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the support period, generally one year. Certain licensing agreements provide for royalty payments based on agreed-upon royalty rates, which may be fixed or variable depending on the terms of the agreement. The amount of revenue we recognize is based on a specified time period or on the agreed-upon royalty rate multiplied by the reported number of units shipped by the customer.

From time to time, we enter into IP licensing agreements that involve significant modification, customization or engineering services. Revenues derived from these contracts are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method or completed contract method. The completed contract method is used for contracts where there is a risk associated with final acceptance by the customer or for short-term contracts.

HDMI royalty revenue is determined by a contractual allocation formula agreed to by the Founders of the HDMI consortium. The contractual allocation formula is subject to periodic adjustment, generally every three years. The most recent agreement expired on December 31, 2016 and a new agreement has not yet been entered into covering the period beginning January 1, 2017. As a result, the HDMI agent is unable to distribute the majority of the royalties collected to the Founders and, given that the fixed and determinable revenue recognition criteria has not been met, we are unable to recognize all of the HDMI royalty revenue for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017. Our estimate of unbilled receivables from the HDMI agent that are not reflected in our financial statements at December 30, 2017 are in the $5 million to $10 million range.

We acted as the agent of the HDMI consortium until December 31, 2016. From time to time, as the agent, we performed audits on royalty reporting customers to ensure compliance. As a result of those compliance efforts, we entered into settlement agreements for the payment of unreported royalties. The contractual terms of those agreements provided for upfront payment of unreported royalties or payment over a period of time, generally not to exceed one year. Revenue from those arrangements was recognized when the agreement was executed by both parties, as long as price was fixed and determinable and collection was reasonably assured.

Inventories and Cost of Product Revenue
Inventories are recorded at the lower of average cost determined on a first-in-first-out basis or market. We establish provisions for inventory if it is obsolete or we hold quantities which are in excess of projected customer demand. The creation of such provisions results in a write-down of inventory to net realizable value and a charge to Cost of product revenue. Shipping and handling costs are included in Cost of product revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to five years for equipment and software, one to three years for tooling, and thirty years for buildings and building space. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the non-cancelable lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets. Upon disposal of property and equipment, the accounts are relieved of the costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization, and resulting gains or losses are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for recognized gains and losses, orAccrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for deferred gains and losses. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Variable Interest Entities and Equity Investments in Privately Held Companies

We have an interest in an entity that is a Variable Interest Entity ("VIE"). If we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we are required to consolidate it. To determine if we are the primary beneficiary, we evaluate whether we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our evaluation includes identification of significant activities and an assessment of our ability to direct those activities based on governance provisions and arrangements to provide or receive product and process technology, product supply, operations services, equity funding, financing, and other applicable agreements and circumstances. Our assessments of whether we are the primary beneficiary of our VIE requires significant assumptions and judgments. We have concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary of this VIE as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance.

Equity investments in privately held companies that we are not required to consolidate are accounted for under the cost method, as assessed under ASC 325-20, "Cost Method Investments." These investments are reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if their values have been impaired and adjustments are recorded as necessary. We assess the potential impairment of these investments by applying a fair value analysis using a revenue multiple approach. Declines in value that are judged to be other-than-temporary are reported in Other (expense) income, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations with a commensurate decrease in the carrying value of the investment (see Note 10). Upon disposition of these investments, the specific identification method is used to determine the cost basis in computing realized gains or losses.


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, are carried on our financial statements based on their cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization. We monitor the carrying value of our long-lived assets for potential impairment and test the recoverability of such assets annually during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. These events or changes in circumstances, including management decisions pertaining to such assets, are referred to as impairment indicators. If an impairment indicator occurs, we perform a test of recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset group to its undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the carrying values are in excess of undiscounted expected future cash flows, we measure any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset group to its carrying value. Fair value is generally determined by considering (i) internally developed discounted projected cash flow analysis of the asset group; (ii) actual third-party valuations; and/or (iii) information available regarding the current market for similar asset groups. If the fair value of the asset group is determined to be less than the carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment in the amount of the difference is recorded in the period that the impairment indicator occurs and is included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and projections may vary from the cash flows eventually realized, which could impact our ability to accurately assess whether an asset has been impaired. The results of our assessments are detailed in Note 9.

Valuation of Goodwill

Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. We review goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, we make a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the reporting unit's fair value is less than the carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and we must measure the impairment loss. The impairment loss, if any, is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill over the implied fair value of the goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, no further impairment analysis is needed. For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, we currently operate as a single reporting unit: the core Lattice ("Core") business, which includes intellectual property and semiconductor devices. In fiscal 2015 only, we separately tested goodwill for impairment in Qterics, a discrete software-as-a-service business unit that was an immaterial operating segment in the Lattice legal entity structure prior to its sale to an unrelated third party in April 2016. Although these two operating units constituted two reportable segments in fiscal 2015, we combined Qterics with our Core business and reported them together as one reportable segment due to the immaterial nature of the Qterics unit. The results of our assessments are detailed in Note 9.

Leases

We lease office space and classify our leases as either operating or capital lease arrangements in accordance with the criteria of ASC 840, “Leases.” Certain of our office space operating leases contain provisions under which monthly rent escalates over time and certain leases may also contain provisions for reimbursement of a specified amount of leasehold improvements. When lease agreements contain escalating rent clauses, we recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. When lease agreements provide allowances for leasehold improvements, we capitalize the leasehold improvement assets and amortize them on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset, and reduce rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease by the amount of the asset capitalized.

Restructuring Charges

Expenses associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized when incurred under ASC 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,” for everything but severance. Because the Company has a history of paying severance benefits, the cost of severance benefits associated with a restructuring plan is recorded when such costs are probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated in accordance with ASC 712, “Compensation - Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” When leased facilities are vacated, an amount equal to the total future lease obligations from the date of vacating the premises through the expiration of the lease, net of any future sublease income, is recorded as a part of restructuring charges.


Research and Development

Research and development expenses include costs for compensation and benefits, development masks, engineering wafers, depreciation, licenses, and outside engineering services. These expenditures are for the design of new products, intellectual property cores, processes, packaging, and software to support new products. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Our provision for income tax is comprised of our current tax liability and changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the difference is expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that in management’s judgment is more-likely-than-not to be recoverable against future taxable income. U.S. tax reform required a deemed repatriation of foreign earnings as of December 30, 2017 and no future U.S. taxes will be due on these earnings because of enactment of a 100% dividends received deduction. Foreign earnings may be subject to withholding taxes if they are distributed and repatriated to Lattice in the United States.

Our income tax calculations are based on application of the respective U.S. federal, state or foreign tax law. Our tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the relevant tax authorities. Accordingly, we recognize tax liabilities based upon our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due when such estimates are more-likely-than-not to be sustained. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different than the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases as well as any interest or penalties are recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, we evaluate both positive and negative evidence that may exist and consider whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

Any adjustment to the net deferred tax asset valuation allowance is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period that the adjustment is determined to be required.

Stock-Based Compensation

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of substantially all share-based awards consistent with the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation.” Option pricing models, including the Black-Scholes model, require the use of input assumptions, including expected volatility, expected term, expected dividend rate, and expected risk-free rate of return. The assumptions for expected volatility and expected term most significantly affect the grant date fair value.

We have also used a lattice-based option-pricing model to determine and fix the fair value of stock options with a market condition granted to certain executives. This valuation model incorporates a Monte-Carlo simulation, and considered the likelihood that we would achieve the market condition. The options have a two year vesting and vest between 0% and 200% of the target amount, based on the Company's relative Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") when compared to the TSR of a component of companies of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index over a two year period. TSR is a measure of stock price appreciation plus dividends paid, if any, in the performance period.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. following balances:

  

December 31,

  

January 1,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

 

Contract liability under ASC 606

 $17,666  $4,768 

Liability for non-cancelable contracts

  10,498   9,930 

Current portion of operating lease liabilities

  6,454   5,696 

Liability for production materials

  6,002    

Other accrued liabilities

  7,847   6,050 

Total accrued liabilities

 $48,467  $26,444 

Cloud Based Computing Implementation Costs

Under this ASU, inventory will be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. The ASU defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” ASU 2015-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. Our adoption of this accounting standard update in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation, Improvements to Employee Share-Based payment Accounting (Topic 718). This update is intended to provide simplification of the accounting for share based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. Our adoption of this accounting standard update in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This update is intended to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory when they occur by removing the exception to postpone recognition until the asset has been sold to an outside party. For public business entities, this guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, and it is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We early adopted this accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and recorded a nominal amount to accumulated deficit based on the guidance as detailed inour Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 deferring the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to periods beginning on or after December 2018-15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within that year. The new standard allows for two transition methodsIntangibles - (i) a full retrospective method applied to each prior reporting period presented, or (ii) a modified retrospective method applied with the cumulative effect of adoption recognized on December 31, 2017, the first day of our fiscal 2018. We will adopt this guidance on December 31, 2017 using the modified retrospective transition method, which will result in an adjustment to accumulated deficit for the cumulative effect of applying this guidance to contracts in process as of the adoption date. Under this approach, we will not restate the prior financial statements presented. This guidance requires us to provide additional disclosures of the amount by which each financial statement line item is affected in the current reporting period during 2018 as compared to the guidance that was in effect before the change, and an explanation of the reasons for significant changes.

Based on our current assessment of the impacts of the standard to revenue, we believe the most significant impact of the new standard will be to accelerate the timing of revenue recognition on product shipments to our sell-through distributors. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, the new guidance would require us to recognize revenue and costs relating to such sales upon shipment to the distributor - subject to reductions for estimated reserves for price adjustments and returns - rather than upon the ultimate sale by the distributor to its end customer, as is our current practice. The impact of this change will depend primarily on the level of inventory held by sell-through distributors at the beginning and end of each period. To the extent these inventory levels fluctuate significantly, revenue under the new standard could be materially different than that under the current standard. Revenue to our sell-through distributors accounted for approximately 66% and 61% of our total revenue, respectively, during the years ended December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. We also anticipate that the new standard will require us to recognize certain licensing revenues which are not recognizable under current GAAP due to the fixed and determinable revenue recognition criteria not being met. We anticipate that the cumulative adjustment resulting from this recognition will be a reduction to 2018 opening accumulated deficit in the $20 million to $30 million range, and we don’t anticipate a material change relating to capitalization of commission expenses.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, to mainly change the accounting for investments in equity securities and financial liabilities carried at fair value as well as to modify the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is retrospective with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings or accumulated deficit as of the adoption date. We do not expect that the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires the recognition of assets and liabilities arising from lease transactions on the balance sheet and will also require significant additional disclosures about the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. Substantially all leases, including current operating leases, will be recognized by lessees on their balance sheet as a lease asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. The new guidance requires a modified prospective transition approach to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented. For public business entities, the standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all entities. We have commenced our implementation efforts, which have focused on considerations for external consultation and development of a project plan. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, including the increase in the assets and liabilities on our balance sheet, and the impact on our current lease portfolio from both a lessor and lessee perspective. To facilitate this, we are utilizing a comprehensive approach to review our lease portfolio, as well as assessing system requirements and control implications. We believe that we have sufficient time and resources to complete our implementation efforts no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2019. See Note 13 - Lease Obligations for our future minimum lease commitments under operating leases.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, this guidance will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. This update requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The standard also narrows the definition of outputs. The definition of a business affects areas of accounting such as acquisitions, disposals and goodwill. Under the new guidance, fewer acquired sets are expected to be considered businesses. For public business entities, this guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The impact of ASU 2017-01 will depend upon the nature of future acquisitions or dispositions that we may make.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying- Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), we are capitalizing the Testimplementation costs for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize an impairment chargecloud computing arrangements, mainly for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. This standard is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment testsour integrated distributor accounting management systems. These cloud-based computing implementation costs are recorded in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017Prepaid expenses and requires a prospective transition method. We will early adopt this accounting standard effective fiscal 2018 on a prospective basis. We do not expect the standard to have an impactother current assets and Other long-term assets on our consolidated financial statements. We expect the adoption of this update to simplify our annual goodwill impairment testing process, by eliminating the need to estimate the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill, if its respective carrying value exceeds fair value.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides clarity on which changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards require entities to apply the modification accounting provisions required in Topic 718. This standard is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We do not expect that the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and simplifies the application of the hedge accounting guidance. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2017-12 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Note 2 - Net Loss Per Share

We compute basic net loss per share by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. To determine diluted share count, we apply the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect of outstanding stock option shares, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), and Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") shares. Our application of the treasury stock method includes, as assumed proceeds, the average unamortized stock-based compensation expense for the period. When we are in a net loss position, we do not include dilutive securities as their inclusion would reduce the net loss per share.


A summary of basic and diluted net loss per share is presented below:
  Year Ended
(in thousands, except per share data) December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
Net loss $(70,562) $(54,099) $(159,233)
       
Shares used in basic and diluted net loss per share 122,677
 119,994
 117,387
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.58) $(0.45) $(1.36)

The computation of diluted net loss per share excludes the effects of stock options, RSUs, and ESPP shares that are antidilutive, aggregating approximately the following number of shares:
  Year Ended
(in thousands) December 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 January 2,
2016
Stock options, RSUs, and ESPP shares excluded as they are antidilutive 6,622
 8,978
 9,243

Stock options, RSUs, and ESPP shares are considered antidilutive when the aggregate of exercise price and unrecognized stock-based compensation expense are greater than the average market price for our common stock during the period. Stock options, RSUs, and ESPP shares that are antidilutive at December 30, 2017 could become dilutive in the future.

Note 3 - Marketable Securities

We classify our marketable securities as short-term based on their nature and availability for use in current operations. Our Short-term marketable securities have contractual maturities of up to two years, with less than one year remaining term as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the composition of our Short-term marketable securities at fair value: 
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Short-term marketable securities:   
Corporate and government bonds and notes$4,982
 $10,230
Certificates of deposit
 78
Total marketable securities$4,982
 $10,308

Note 4 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 Fair value measurements as of Fair value measurements as of
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
(In thousands)Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Short-term marketable securities$4,982
 $4,982
 $
 $
 $10,308
 $10,230
 $78
 $
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts, net77
 
 77
 
 184
 
 184
 
Total fair value of financial instruments$5,059
 $4,982
 $77
 $
 $10,492
 $10,230
 $262
 $

We invest in various financial instruments that may include corporate and government bonds and notes, commercial paper, and certificates of deposit. In addition, we enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to mitigate our foreign currency exchange rate exposure. We carry these instruments at their fair value in accordance with ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements." The framework under the provisions of ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Each level of input has different levels of subjectivity and difficulty involved in determining fair value, as summarized in Note 1. There were no transfers between any of the levels during fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015.


In accordance with ASC 320, “Investments-Debt and Equity Securities,” we recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $0.1 millionactivity during the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017, and an unrealized lossperiods presented:

(In thousands)

    

Cloud based computing implementation costs as of January 2, 2021

 $2,831 

Costs capitalized

  324 

Amortization

  (775)

Cloud based computing implementation costs as of January 1, 2022

 $2,380 

Costs capitalized

  63 

Amortization

  (841)

Cloud based computing implementation costs as of December 31, 2022

 $1,602 

46

Note 5 - Inventories

(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Work in progress$49,642
 $50,688
Finished goods30,261
 28,480
Total inventories$79,903
 $79,168

Note 6 - Property and Equipment
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Buildings$
 $3,554
Computer and test equipment155,492
 162,388
Office furniture and equipment2,914
 3,460
Leasehold and building improvements13,277
 14,865
 171,683
 184,267
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(131,260) (134,786)
 $40,423
 $49,481

Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment was $16.3 million and $18.4 million for

  December 31,  January 1, 

(In thousands)

 2022  2022 

Production equipment and software

 $149,787  $133,039 

Leasehold improvements

  12,416   12,960 

Office furniture and equipment

  1,760   2,000 
   163,963   147,999 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (116,349)  (109,905)
  $47,614  $38,094 

For fiscal years 20172022, 2021, and 2016, respectively. For fiscal year 2015,2020 depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment was $18.1$13.8 million, including $1.5 million of restructuring expense.


In August 2017, we sold building space which we owned in Shanghai, China. The building space was vacated in fiscal 2015, upon consolidation of facilities to a single, alternate site in Shanghai following our acquisition of Silicon Image, and was sold for gross proceeds of approximately $7.9 million. As of the sale date, the asset had a historical cost of $3.6 million, accumulated depreciation of $1.4$12.0 million, and we incurred $1.1$11.8 million, respectively.

Property and Equipment – Geographic Information

Our Property and equipment, net by country at the end of direct selling costs, resulting in a net gain on sale of $4.6 million, which is presentedeach period was as Gain on sale of building in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.follows:

  December 31,  January 1, 

(In thousands)

 2022  2022 

United States

 $29,118  $26,509 
         

Taiwan

  10,732   6,555 

Philippines

  3,596   2,498 

China

  2,229   1,643 

Other

  1,939   889 

Total foreign property and equipment, net

  18,496   11,585 

Total property and equipment, net

 $47,614  $38,094 


In November 2014, we sold land and buildings, comprising the former location of our corporate headquarters and executive office in Hillsboro, Oregon, for net proceeds of approximately $14.6 million. This property had a historical cost of $30.9 million and accumulated depreciation of $17.9 million, resulting in a net gain on sale of $1.6 million. We leased back a portion of the facilities for a lease term of eight years, resulting in deferral of the gain, which is being amortized over the life of the lease.

Note 76 - Sales of Assets and Business Units, Business Combinations,Combination and Goodwill

Sales of Assets and Business Units

On September 30, 2017, in conjunction with our June 2017 restructuring plan (see Note 15), we sold 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiary and certain assets related to our Simplay Labs testing and certification business to Invecas, Inc. The fair value of purchase price consideration was $5.3 million, which was comprised of $2.3 million of cash and a $3.0 million note receivable. We recorded a $1.8 million loss on the sale, including a $2.2 million disposal of a relative fair value share of our goodwill, which is included in Other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


In April 2016, we sold Qterics to an unrelated third party for net proceeds of $2.0 million, net of cash sold, resulting in a gain of $2.6 million. The gain was included in Other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period of sale. In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we received a final escrow payment of $0.3 million related to the sale of Qterics, which was included as a gain in Other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period of receipt.

Business Combinations

On March 10, 2015, November 12, 2021, we acquired 100% of the outstanding equityshares of Silicon Image,Mirametrix, Inc. ("Silicon Image"Mirametrix"), a provider of video, audio,an innovator in advanced AI software and data connectivity solutions forcomputer vision ("CV") applications. This acquisition combines Mirametrix technology and expertise with Lattice’s innovative hardware and software solution stacks to create an end-to-end AI and computer vision solution that spans from the mobile, consumer electronics, and personal computer markets for total fair value purchasehardware to the application layer. Total consideration of $588.5to acquire Mirametrix was $68.5 million, paid 100% in cash and assumed partially vested stock options and RSUs.

to Mirametrix shareholders. There is no contingent consideration included in the determination of the purchase consideration.

Purchase consideration was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed on the basis of the respective estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The estimation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of Mirametrix, by major class, were recognized as follows:

(In thousands)

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

Assets acquired:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $437 

Accounts receivable

  3,265 

Other current assets

  262 

Property and equipment

  156 

Intangible assets

  24,800 

Goodwill

  47,844 

Total assets acquired

  76,764 

Liabilities assumed

    

Accounts payable

  21 

Accrued liabilities

  5 

Accrued payroll obligations

  247 

Long-term liabilities

  7,955 

Total liabilities assumed

  8,228 

Fair value of net assets acquired

 $68,536 

47

The following table presents details of the identified intangible assets requiredacquired through the useacquisition of valuation techniques includingMirametrix, as of November 12, 2021:

  

Useful Life

  

Fair Value

 
  

(In years)

  

(In thousands)

 

Existing technology

  7  $13,500 

Customer relationships

  7   9,800 

Trade name / trademarks

  10   1,500 

Total identified intangible assets subject to amortization

     $24,800 

We do not believe there is any significant residual value associated with these intangible assets. We are amortizing the income approach andintangible assets using the cost approach, and entailed consideration of all the relevant factors that might affect the fair value such as present value factors, and estimates of future revenues and costs.


straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.

Goodwill


Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. The goodwill recognized in the acquisition of Mirametrix was derived from expected benefits from cost synergies and the knowledgeable and experienced workforce who joined the Company after the acquisition. Goodwill resulting from the acquisition is not amortized, but is instead tested for impairment annually or more frequently if certain indicators of impairment are present. We do not expect goodwill impairment to be tax deductible for Canada income tax purposes.

The goodwill balance of approximately $315.4 million at December 31, 2022 is comprised of approximately $267.5 million from prior acquisitions combined with the approximately $47.8 million from the acquisition of Mirametrix. No impairment charges relating to goodwill were recorded for either fiscal 20172022, 2021, or fiscal 2016 as no indicators of impairment were present. A $12.7 million charge to fully impair the Qterics goodwill was recorded for fiscal 2015 (Note 9).2020.


In the first quarter of 2016, we finalized our valuation and allocation of purchase price consideration related to the acquisition of Silicon Image, Inc. ("Silicon Image") resulting in $2.1 million of additional long-term liabilities related to an uncertain tax position and $0.1 million of other tax-related adjustments with an equivalent revision to Goodwill, which is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period ended December 31, 2016.

As part of our accounting for the asset sale to Invecas, Inc. in September 2017, we recorded a $2.2 million disposal of a relative fair value share of our Goodwill.

Changes to the Goodwill balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are summarized in the following table:

(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Beginning balance $269,758
 $267,549
Additions 
 2,209
Disposals (2,244) 
Ending balance $267,514
 $269,758

Note 87 - Intangible Assets

In connection with our acquisitions of Mirametrix, Inc. in November 2021, Silicon Image, Inc. in March 2015,and SiliconBlue Technologies, Inc. in December 2011, we recorded identifiable intangible assets related to developed technology, customer relationships, licensed technology, patents, and in-process research and development based on guidance for determining fair value under the provisions of ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements." Additionally, during fiscal 2015 and 2017, we licensed additional third-party technology. We do not believe there is any significant residual value associated with these intangible assets. We are amortizing the intangible assets using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.


During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, Additionally, we sold a portfolio of patents that had beenhave entered into license agreements for third-party technology and recorded them as intangible assets. These licenses are being amortized to Research and development expense over their estimated useful lives. No impairment charges relating to acquired in our acquisition of Silicon Image for $18.0 million. This amount was received in two installments over the first and second quarters of fiscal 2017, and was recognized as licensing and services revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Operations during the respective periods in which the installment payments were received. As a result of this transaction, Intangible assets, net was reduced by approximately $3.5 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We monitor the carrying value of our intangible assets were recorded for potential impairment and test the recoverability of such assets annually during the fourth quarter and whenever eventsfiscal 2022, 2021, or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The results of our assessments are summarized below and more fully detailed in Note 9.


During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we finalized our impairment assessment procedures related to certain of the developed technology intangible assets acquired in our acquisition of Silicon Image, resulting in a $3.8 million reduction to the preliminary impairment charge of $36.2 million recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, for a net impairment charge of $32.4 million in fiscal 2017. During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we recorded a $7.9 million impairment charge to the intangible assets associated with future HDMI adopter fees. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we recorded a $9.0 million impairment charge to the intangible assets of the then Qterics operating segment comprising developed technology of $3.9 million, and customer relationships of $5.1 million. With the sale of Qterics in April 2016, its balances for intangible assets, accumulated amortization, and impairment have been removed from the balance for Intangible assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016.

2020.

The following tables summarize the details of our Intangible assets, net as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

2022 and January 1, 2022:

  

December 31, 2022

 

(In thousands)

 

Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)

  

Gross

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Intangible assets, net

 

Existing technology

 5.1  $124,487  $(113,157) $11,330 

Customer relationships

 6.1   32,734   (24,509)  8,225 

Trade name / trademarks

 10.0   1,500   (169)  1,331 

Licensed technology

 6.3   6,671   (2,487)  4,184 

Total identified intangible assets

    $165,392  $(140,322) $25,070 

  

January 1, 2022

 

(In thousands)

 

Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)

  

Gross

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Intangible assets, net

 

Existing technology

 5.1  $124,487  $(111,090) $13,397 

Customer relationships

 6.1   32,734   (22,947)  9,787 

Trade name / trademarks

 10.0   1,500   (19)  1,481 

Licensed technology

 6.3   6,551   (1,434)  5,117 

Total identified intangible assets

    $165,272  $(135,490) $29,782 

48
  December 30, 2017
(In thousands) Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) Gross Impairment Accumulated Amortization Intangible assets, net
Developed technology 4.7 $158,700
 $(32,431) $(81,847) $44,422
Customer relationships 5.7 22,934
 
 (16,696) 6,238
Licensed technology 3.5 2,392
 
 (1,744) 648
Total identified intangible assets   $184,026
 $(32,431) $(100,287) $51,308


  December 31, 2016
(In thousands) Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) Gross Impairment Accumulated Amortization Intangible assets, net
Developed technology 4.7 $141,359
 $
 $(55,493) $85,866
Customer relationships 6.1 30,800
 (7,866) (13,694) 9,240
Licensed technology 3.3 2,127
 
 (1,201) 926
Patents 5 769
 
 (279) 490
Total identified finite-lived intangible assets   175,055
 (7,866) (70,667) 96,522
In-process research and development indefinite 22,341
 
 
 22,341
Total identified intangible assets   $197,396
 $(7,866) $(70,667) $118,863

We recorded amortization expense related to intangible assets on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as presented in the following table:

 Year Ended
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Research and development$569
 $745
 $731
Amortization of acquired intangible assets31,340
 33,575
 29,580
 $31,909
 $34,320
 $30,311


  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Research and development

 $1,054  $901  $124 

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

  3,778   2,613   4,449 
  $4,832  $3,514  $4,573 

The annual expected amortization expense of acquired intangible assets with finite lives is as follows:

Fiscal year

 

(In thousands)

 

2023

 $4,522 

2024

  4,310 

2025

  4,263 

2026

  4,261 

2027

  4,197 

Thereafter

  3,517 

Total

 $25,070 

(In thousands)Amount
2018$19,419
201916,619
20207,504
20215,148
20222,352
Thereafter266
Total$51,308

Note 98 - ImpairmentLong-Term Debt

On September 1, 2022, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “2022 Credit Agreement”), which provides for a five-year secured revolving loan facility with an aggregate principal amount of Goodwillup to $350 million, along with other components and Acquired Intangible Assets


Inoptions, such as a letter of credit, swingline loan, and expansion of revolving and/or term loan commitments, currently not in use.

We drew down an initial $150 million revolving loan at closing, which we used along with $1.9 million of cash to (i) repay the $150.5 million term loan, revolving loan, and accrued interest obligations outstanding under our previous credit agreement (the “2019 Credit Agreement”), and (ii) pay fees and expenses totaling $1.4 million incurred in connection with our acquisitions of Silicon Image in March 2015 and SiliconBlue in December 2011 we recorded goodwill and identifiable intangible assets relatedthe 2022 Credit Agreement. We intend to developed technology, customer relationships, licensed technology, patents, and in-process research. We monitor the carrying value of our goodwill and acquired intangible assets for potential impairment and test the recoverability of such assets annually during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. When we are required to determine the fair value of intangible assets other than goodwill, we use the income approach. We start withrevolving loan facility for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At our option, the revolving loans accrue interest at a forecastper annum rate based on ranges determined by our consolidated total leverage ratio of all expected net cash flows associated witheither (i) the asset and then apply a discountbase rate to arrive at fair value.


In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we updated our annual strategic long-range plan, which resulted in revised forecasts. We also sold 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiary and certain assets related to our Simplay Labs testing and certification business to an unrelated third party. We determined that these activities constituted impairment indicators related to the developed technology intangible assets acquired in our acquisition of Silicon Image. Our assessment of the fair value of these intangible assets concluded that they had been impaired as of September 30, 2017, and we recorded a preliminary impairment charge of $36.2 million(as defined in the Consolidated Statements2022 Credit Agreement) plus a margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%, or (ii) the adjusted Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") for interest periods of Operations. During1,3 or 6 months plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%. Interest is due and payable in arrears quarterly for loans bearing interest at the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed our detailed analysisbase rate and evaluation of the information and assumptions used in the determination of the impairment charge, which included reviewing information, inputs, assumptions, and valuation methodologies used to estimate the fair value of these intangible assets, and finalization of review by an independent valuation expert. As a result, we recorded a $3.8 million reduction to the preliminary impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, for a net impairment charge of $32.4 million in fiscal 2017. No impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded in fiscal 2017 as no indicators of impairment were present.

In September 2016, the Founders of the HDMI consortium, of which we are a member, amended the existing Founders Agreement as part of a regular amendment process resulting in changes to our role as agent for the HDMI consortium and to the model for sharing adopter fee revenues. Under the terms of the amendment agreement, our role as the agent was terminated effective January 1, 2017 and a new independent entity was appointed to act as the new HDMI licensing agent with responsibility for licensing and the distribution of royalties among Founders. As a result of the amended model for sharing revenue, we will be entitled to a reduced share of adopter fees paid by parties adopting the HDMI standard. We determined that this modification constituted an impairment indicator related to the intangible assets acquired in the Silicon Image acquisition associated with future HDMI adopter fees. Our assessment of the fair value of these intangible assets concluded that they had been impaired as ofat the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2016, and we recorded a $7.9 million impairment chargean interest period (or at each three-month interval in the Consolidated Statementscase of Operations. No impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded in fiscal 2016 as no indicators of impairment were present.

For fiscal 2015, the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets was related to Qterics, Inc., which was acquiredloans with interest periods greater than three months) in the March 2015 acquisitioncase of Silicon Image. Duringloans bearing interest at the fourth quarteradjusted Term SOFR. In addition, we pay a quarterly commitment fee of fiscal 2016, we determined that we experienced an impairment indicator related0.20% on the unused portion of the revolving facility.

With the amendment of our 2019 Credit Agreement pursuant to the long-lived assets2022 Credit Agreement, we capitalized $0.9 million of the Qterics operating segment. For purposesnew debt costs, and expensed $0.7 million of testing for impairmentdebt costs and existing original issue discount ("OID") as a loss on refinancing in fiscal 2015, the Company operated as two reporting units: the continuing core Lattice ("Core") business, which includes intellectual property and semiconductor devices, and Qterics, which was a discrete software-as-a-service business unit in the Lattice legal entity structure until it was sold in April 2016. Although these two operating segments constituted two reportable segments in fiscal 2015, we combined Qterics withOther (expense) income, net on our Core business and reported them together as one reportable segment due to the immaterial nature of the Qterics segment. Following this assessment, we concluded that goodwill and intangible assets had been impaired in the Qterics segment as of December 31, 2016. As a result we recorded an impairment charge amounting to $21.7 million, or approximately 92% of the previous value of goodwill and intangible assets, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal 2022. We determine the year ended December 31, 2016, comprising $12.7 million pertaining to goodwill, $3.9 million pertaining to developed technology, and $5.1 million pertaining to customer relationships. The valuation was based onCurrent portion of long-term debt, if any, as the market approach and was our best estimate of fair value assum of the end of fiscal 2015. No impairment charges were recorded forrequired debt payments to be made over the Core segment in fiscal 2015.



Note 10 - Cost Method Investmentnext twelve months, reduced by the OID and Collaborative Arrangement

During fiscal 2015, we purchased a series of preferred stock ownership interests in a privately-held company that designs human-computer interaction technology for total consideration of $5.0 million. This gross investment constituted a 22.7% ownership interest. In the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we made an additional investment of $1.0 million via a convertible debt instrument, bringingissuance costs to be amortized over the next twelve months.

The revolving loans under the 2022 Credit Agreement may be repaid and reborrowed at our gross investment in the investee to $6.0 million.


In each of the second and third quarters of fiscal 2017, we advanced the investee $1.0 million through a short-term instrument, bringing our total short-term advances to the investee to $2.0 million. As these advances werediscretion, with any remaining outstanding principal amount due and payable inon the fourth quartermaturity date of the revolving loans on September 1, 2027. During fiscal 2017, they were included in Prepaid expenses2022, we made principal payments totaling $28.8 million, including a discretionary payment of $20 million on the revolving loans outstanding under the 2022 Credit Agreement and other current assetsrequired quarterly installments totaling $8.8 million on the term loans outstanding under the 2019 Credit Agreement.

The fair value of our long-term debt approximates the carrying value, which is reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets while outstanding. The investee repaid the total advances in October 2017.as follows:

  

December 31,

  

January 1,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

 

Principal amount

 $130,000  $158,750 

Unamortized original issuance discount and debt costs

  (1,248)  (817)

Less: Current portion of long-term debt

     (17,173)

Long-term debt, net of current portion and unamortized debt issue costs

 $128,752  $140,760 

49


In 2017, we signed new development and licensing contracts with the investee, and the investee obtaining preferred

Interest expense related to our long-term debt that effectively subordinates our ownership position between their debt and common shareholders. After evaluating these events and our investment position, we concluded that we have a variable interest in the privately-held company. However, since we are not the primary beneficiary of the investee, are not holding in-substance common stock, and do not have a significant amount of influence to direct the activities that most significantly impact the investee’s economic performance, accordingly we account for our investment in this company under the cost method.


We assessed this investment for impairment as of December 30, 2017 by applying a fair value analysis using a revenue multiple approach. This yielded a fair value for our ownership stake of $2.3 million, which was less than its carrying value at the date of assessment. We determined that this impairment was other-than-temporary and adjusted the carrying value to the fair value.

The total impairment adjustments against this investment that we have recognized through Other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations are presented in the following table:
  Year Ended
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Impairment of cost-basis investment $(1,761) $(1,459) $(492)

Through December 30, 2017, we have reduced the value of our investment by approximately $3.7 million. The net balance of our investmentis included in Other long-term assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets is detailed in the following table:

(In thousands) Total
Balance at January 2, 2016 $4,508
Investment made during fiscal year 1,000
Impairment of cost-basis investment (1,459)
Balance at December 31, 2016 4,049
Impairment of cost-basis investment (1,761)
Balance at December 30, 2017 $2,288

At December 30, 2017, our maximum exposure to loss as a result of involvement with this VIE totals $2.9 million, which is comprised of the $2.3 million fair value of our investment plus $0.6 million of prepaid royalties further described in the section below on the related collaborative arrangement.


Collaborative Arrangement

Concurrent with the initiation of the investment discussed above, we entered into a collaborative arrangement with the investee. Under this arrangement, the parties undertook the development of certain fast, multi-touch sensing devices for touch screen controller applications. The new development and licensing agreements we entered into in 2017 specified the transfer of certain Intellectual Property ("IP") from the investee to us, payment of royalties from us to the investee and from investee to us for future sales of co-developed products, as well as an agreement to perform certain services for each other at no charge. We will also make periodic payments to the investee. These will be automatically credited against any future revenue share amount owed to investee and will be accounted for as prepaid royalties under ASC 340-10-05-05. The schedule of periodic payments for prepaid royalties is as follows:
    Amount of each
Fiscal Year Frequency 
payment (In thousands)
2017 In the fourth calendar quarter $625
2018 At the end of each calendar quarter $875
2019 At the end of each calendar quarter $1,250

At December 30, 2017, royalties prepaid to the investee total $0.6 million and are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. There is no liability related to these payments as they are contractually associated with specific future periods.

Note 11 - Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are the following balances:
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Trade accounts payable$35,350
 $37,800
Liability for non-cancelable contracts4,531
 5,744
Payable to members of the MHL and HDMI consortia*87
 9,698
Other accrued expenses14,437
 27,691
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses$54,405
 $80,933

* As an agent of the MHL consortium, we administer royalty reporting and distributions to the members of this consortium.
This excludes amounts payable to us, and is payable quarterly based on collections from MHL customers. Our role as the
agent of the HDMI consortium terminated on January 1, 2017 and, therefore, the balance as of December 30, 2017 is due to
MHL consortium members only.

Note 12 - Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

With the acquisition of Silicon Image on March 10, 2015, we also assumed a redeemable noncontrolling interest which comprised a 7% investment in Qterics amounting to $7.0 million invested by the noncontrolling interest holder initially entered into on December 4, 2014. The investment was redeemable at fair market value at the third-party holder's option on the third, fourth, or fifth year anniversaries. If the fair market value at the redemption date, as negotiated and agreed to by the parties, did not exceed $21 million, the redemption price would be 130% of the fair market value.

As of the acquisition date, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was determined to be $7.2 million, recorded as temporary equity and reported as Redeemable noncontrolling interest in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We elected to accrete the carrying value to the estimated redemption value over the three-year redemption period and reported the accretion charge as a reduction to Additional-paid-in-capital. During fiscal 2015, we recorded cumulative accretion charges amounting to $0.4 million bringing the value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest to $7.6 million.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we entered into an agreement with the holder pursuant to which the entire interest was redeemed for a cash payment of approximately $0.9 million. The difference between the carrying value and the redemption amount of approximately $6.7 million was partially offset by accretion charges and net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest recorded prior to redemption totaling approximately $0.6 million. The net amount of approximately $6.1 million was recorded as Additional paid-in-capital during the year ended January 2, 2016 (See our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity).


Note 13 - Lease Obligations

Certain of our facilities are leased under operating leases, which expire at various times through 2026. Rental expense under operating leases was $8.9 million, $9.5 million and $7.4 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future minimum lease commitments at December 30, 2017 were as follows:
Fiscal year Amount
(In thousands) 
2018 $6,310
2019 4,784
2020 4,860
2021 4,654
2022 4,694
Thereafter 14,259
  $39,561

Note 14 - Income Taxes

The domestic and foreign components of loss before income taxes were as follows:

  Year Ended
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Domestic $(17,341) $(33,962) $(93,229)
Foreign (52,372) (10,220) (33,464)
Loss before taxes $(69,713) $(44,182) $(126,693)

The components of the income tax expense are as follows:

  Year Ended
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Current:      
Federal $508
 $1,896
 $968
State 30
 13
 80
Foreign 304
 7,918
 10,634
  842
 9,827
 11,682
Deferred:      
Federal 
 
 18,713
State 
 
 2,318
Foreign 7
 90
 (173)
  7
 90
 20,858
Income tax expense $849
 $9,917
 $32,540



Income tax expense differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to pretax income as a result of the following differences:

  Year Ended
  December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
  % % %
Statutory federal rate (35) (35) (35)
Adjustments for tax effects of:      
State taxes, net (7) 7 (6)
Research and development credits (1) (2) (2)
Stock compensation 3 3 1
Foreign rate differential 28 15 12
Foreign dividends 1  5
Foreign withholding taxes  9 3
Other permanent  3 4
Goodwill impairment   4
Valuation allowance (73) 17 46
Change in uncertain tax benefit accrual 1 5 (8)
Stock compensation adoption (8)  
Tax rate change 93  3
Other (1) 1 (1)
Effective income tax rate 1 23 26

ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of these assets is more-likely-than-not. We evaluate both positive and negative evidence to determine if some or all of our deferred tax assets should be recognized on a quarterly basis.

In fiscal 2015, we completed the acquisition of Silicon Image, Inc. At the time of the acquisition, we evaluated the combined entity's net deferred income taxes, which included an assessment of the cumulative income or loss over the prior three-year period, to determine if a valuation allowance is required. After considering the significant loss for fiscal 2015, the company recorded a valuation allowance on its net federal and state deferred tax assets. We concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that we would not be able to realize the benefit of our remaining U.S. deferred tax assets, resulting in an increase to the valuation allowance and an increase to the tax provision of $21.0 million in fiscal 2015. We exercised significant judgment and considered estimates about our ability to generate revenue and gross profits sufficient enough to offset expenditures in future periods within the United States.

Through December 30, 2017, we continued to evaluate the valuation allowance position in the United States and concluded we should maintain a valuation allowance against the net federal and state deferred tax assets.

We will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence in future periods to determine if more deferred tax assets should be recognized. We don't have a valuation allowance in any foreign jurisdictions as it has been concluded it is more likely than not that we will realize the net deferred tax assets in future periods. The net decrease in the total valuation allowance affecting the effective tax rate for the year ended December 30, 2017 was approximately $51.0 million, mainly attributable to the tax impact of the recent tax law change that reduced the value of our income tax deferred tax assets and reduced the related valuation allowance.


The components of our net deferred tax assets are as follows:

(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Deferred tax assets:    
Accrued expenses and reserves $3,096
 $5,143
Inventory 2
 290
Deferred Revenue 228
 426
Stock-based and deferred compensation 4,018
 7,269
Intangible assets 19,576
 20,063
Fixed assets 216
 678
Net operating loss carry forwards 86,410
 137,521
Tax credit carry forwards 90,530
 89,174
Capital loss carry forwards 3,926
 962
Other 2,323
 2,973
  210,325
 264,499
Less: valuation allowance (209,691) (260,687)
Net deferred tax assets 634
 3,812
Deferred tax liabilities:    
Fixed Assets 559
 
Other 16
 3,746
Total deferred tax liabilities 575
 3,746
Net deferred tax assets $59
 $66

At December 30, 2017, we had U.S. federal net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards (pretax) of approximately $351.4 million that expire at various dates between 2018 and 2036. We had state NOL carryforwards (pretax) of approximately $162.9 million that expire at various dates from 2018 through 2036. We also had federal and state credit carryforwards of $50.2 million and $59.2 million, respectively. Of the $59.3 million state credit carryforwards, $57.9 million do not expire. The federal and remaining state credits expire at various dates from 2018 through 2037.

Future utilization of federal and state net operating losses and tax credit carry forwards may be limited if cumulative changes to ownership exceed 50% within any three-year period. This has not occurred through fiscal 2017. If there is a significant change in ownership, future tax attribute utilization may be restricted (§382 limitation) and NOL carryforwards and/or R&D credits will be reduced to reflect the limitation.

U.S. tax reform required a deemed repatriation of deferred foreign earnings as of December 30, 2017 and no future U.S. taxes will be due on these earnings because of enactment of a 100% dividends received deduction. At December 30, 2017, we had no impact from this transition tax due to negative post-1986 earnings and profits.

At December 30, 2017, our unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions were $44.8 million, of which $42.9 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, subject to valuation allowance. As of December 30, 2017, interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits were $8.1 million.

Our liability for uncertain tax positions (including penalties and interest) was $26.9 million and $29.6 million at December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and is recorded as a component of Other long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remainder of our uncertain tax position exposure of $24.6 million is netted against deferred tax assets.



The following table summarizes the changes to unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015:

(In thousands) Amount
Balance at January 3, 2015 $18,673
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 4,381
Additions based on tax positions of prior years 
Additions due to acquisition 41,083
Reduction for tax positions of prior years (14,958)
Settlements 
Reduction as a result of lapse of applicable statute of limitations (972)
Balance at January 2, 2016 48,207
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 2,573
Additions based on tax positions of prior years 530
Additions due to acquisition 
Reduction for tax positions of prior years (1,824)
Settlements 
Reduction as a result of lapse of applicable statute of limitations (1,863)
Balance at December 31, 2016 47,623
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 471
Additions based on tax positions of prior years 11
Additions due to acquisition 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (1,226)
Settlements 
Reduction as a result of lapse of applicable statute of limitations (2,047)
Balance at December 30, 2017 $44,832

At December 30, 2017, it is reasonably possible that $1.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits and $0.1 million of associated interest and penalties could be recognized during the next twelve months.

We are subject to federal and state income tax as well as income tax in the various foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. Additionally, the years that remain subject to examination are 2014 for federal income taxes, 2013 for state income taxes, and 2011 for foreign income taxes, including years ending thereafter. However, to the extent allowed by law, the tax authorities may have the right to examine prior periods where net operating losses or tax credits were generated and carried forward, and make adjustments up to the amount of the net operating losses or credit carryforward amount.

Our income tax return for China is currently under examination for 2014 through 2016. We are not under examination in any other jurisdiction.

On December 18, 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the "2015 Tax Act") was enacted. The 2015 Tax Act included several business tax provisions including the permanent extension of the credit for qualified research and development. The tax benefit in each year resulting from these reinstatements of the federal research and development tax credit was offset by a valuation allowance and therefore did not impact our annual effective tax rate.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act"), enacted December 22, 2017, contains provisions that affect us, but the impact will be absorbed by utilizing NOL carry forwards. Reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% reduced the value of our domestic deferred tax assets and reduced our associated full valuation allowance on those assets, resulting in no net impact on our Consolidated Statements of Operation.Operations as follows:

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Contractual interest

 $4,500  $2,304  $3,319 

Amortization of original issuance discount and debt costs

  310   362   400 

Total interest expense related to long-term debt

 $4,810  $2,666  $3,719 


The SEC issued SAB 118 on December 22, 2017 which addresses situations where the registrant does not have all the necessary information available or analyzed to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects

Note 9 - Restructuring

In September 2022, our management approved and implemented additional contract cancellations and headcount reductions under the 2017 Tax Act. Due to the lack of authoritative guidance issued, complexity,Q22019 Sales Plan, an internal restructuring plan that our management approved and enactment timingexecuted in April 2019. The Q22019 Sales Plan focused on a restructuring of the global sales organization through cancellation of certain contracts and a workforce reduction. With these actions, we incurred approximately $1.0 million of incremental restructuring costs in fiscal 2022. Under this plan, no restructuring expense was incurred during fiscal 2021, and we incurred restructuring expense of approximately $0.1 million during fiscal 2020. Under this plan, approximately $3.1 million of total expense has been incurred through December 31, 2022. All actions planned under the Q22019 Sales Plan have been implemented.

In March 2020, our management approved and executed an internal restructuring plan (the “Q12020 Plan”), which included a workforce reduction in order to reduce our operating cost structure by leveraging our low-cost regions as well as enhancing efficiency. Under this plan, we recorded a credit of approximately $0.1 million during fiscal 2022, and we incurred restructuring expense of approximately $0.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, during fiscal 2021 and 2020. Approximately $2.1 million of total expense has been incurred through December 31, 2022 under the Q12020 Plan. All actions planned under the Q12020 Plan have been implemented.

In June 2017, Tax Act, we have made a reasonable estimate of the income tax effect of the deemed repatriation of deferred foreign earnings. We may refine this as additional guidance, clarification, and analysis is available. Any changes to our estimate will be reflected in continuing operations in the period the amounts are determined and within the “measurement period” allowed under SAB 118.



We are not currently paying U.S. federal income taxes and do not expect to pay such taxes until we fully utilize our tax NOL and credit carryforwards. We expect to pay a nominal amount of state income tax. We are paying foreign income and withholding taxes, which are reflected in income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and are primarily related to the cost of operating offshore activities and subsidiaries. We accrue interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

Note 15 - Restructuring

In March 2015, our Board of Directors approved an internal restructuring plan (the "March 2015 "June 2017 Plan"), which included actions, among others, to reconfigure our use of certain leased properties. Under the June 2017 Plan, we incurred approximately $1.1 million of incremental restructuring costs in connection withfiscal 2022 related to an impairment of the operating lease right-of-use asset for our acquisitionpartially vacated facility in San Jose, California. Including these charges, we incurred restructuring expense of Silicon Image. The March 2015 Plan was designed to realize synergies from the acquisition by eliminating redundancies created as a resultapproximately $1.6 million during fiscal 2022, and we incurred restructuring expense of combining the two companies. This included reductions in our worldwide workforce, consolidation of facilities,approximately $0.7 million and cancellation of software contracts$1.9 million, respectively, during fiscal 2021 and engineering tools. The March 2015 Plan is substantially complete subject to certain remaining expected costs that we do not expect to be material and any changes in sublease assumptions should they occur, which will be expensed as incurred. 2020.Under this plan, we have incurred approximately $0.1 million of credit, and $7.3 million and $13.3 million of expense was incurred during the years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and January 2, 2016, respectively. Approximately $20.5$23.3 million of total expense has been incurred through December 30, 201731, 2022. All actions planned under the March 2015 Plan, and we believe this amount approximates the total costs expected.

In September 2015, we implemented a further reduction of our worldwide workforce (the "September 2015 Reduction") separate from the March 2015 Plan. The September 2015 Reduction was designed to resize the company in line with the market environment and to better balance our workforce with the long-term strategic needs of our business. The September 2015 Reduction is substantially complete subject to certain remaining expected costs, which we do not expect to be material but which will be expensed as incurred. Under this reduction, approximately $0.7 million of credit, and $2.0 million and $5.9 million of expense was incurred during the years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and January 2, 2016, respectively. Approximately $7.2 million of total expense has been incurred through December 30, 2017 under the September 2015 Reduction, and we believe this amount approximates the total costs expected.

In June 2017 our Board of Directors approved an additional internal restructuring plan (the "June 2017 Plan"), which included the sale of 100% of the equity of our Hyderabad, India subsidiaryPlan have been implemented.

These expenses and certain assets related to our Simplay Labs testing and certification business, a worldwide workforce reduction, and an initiative to reduce our infrastructure costs. These actions are part of an overall plan to achieve financial targets and to enhance our financial and competitive position by better aligning our revenue and operating expenses. Approximately $8.0 million of total expense has been incurred through December 30, 2017 under the June 2017 Plan, and we expect the total cost to be approximately $8.0 million to $19.0 million.


For fiscal 2017, the approximately $8.0 million of expense related to the June 2017 Plan has been offset by credits from the March 2015 Plan and the September 2015 Reduction discussed above totaling approximately $0.8 million, resulting in the net charge of approximately $7.2 millionwere recorded to restructuringRestructuring charges on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The restructuring accrual balance is presented in Accounts payableAccrued liabilities and accrued expenses (includes restructuring)Other long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.


The following table displays the activity related to the restructuring plans described above:

(In thousands)

 

Severance & Related (1)

  

Lease Termination & Fixed Assets

  

Other (2)

  

Total

 

Accrued Restructuring at December 28, 2019

 $160  $6,585  $865  $7,610 

Restructuring charges

  1,669   1,896   372   3,937 

Costs paid or otherwise settled

  (1,583)  (248)  (573)  (2,404)

Accrued Restructuring at January 2, 2021

 $246  $8,233  $664  $9,143 

Restructuring charges

  250   690      940 

Costs paid or otherwise settled

  (245)  (1,793)  (664)  (2,702)

Accrued Restructuring at January 1, 2022

 $251  $7,130  $  $7,381 

Restructuring charges

  303   1,608   640   2,551 

Costs paid or otherwise settled

  (154)  (2,846)     (3,000)

Accrued Restructuring at December 31, 2022

 $400  $5,892  $640  $6,932 

(1)

Includes employee relocation costs and outplacement costs

(2)

Includes termination fees on the cancellation of certain contracts

50

(In thousands)Severance & related * Lease termination Software Contracts & Engineering Tools** Other Total
Balance at January 3, 2015$
 $43
 $
 $139
 $182
Restructuring charges12,861
 2,667
 3,040
 671
 19,239
Costs paid or otherwise settled(9,165) (1,705) (2,663) (810) (14,343)
Balance at January 2, 2016$3,696
 $1,005
 $377
 $
 $5,078
Restructuring charges2,883
 2,993
 1,903
 1,488
 9,267
Costs paid or otherwise settled(5,778) (2,962) (2,255) (1,476) (12,471)
Balance at December 31, 2016$801
 $1,036
 $25
 $12
 $1,874
Restructuring charges2,484
 811
 3,066
 835
 7,196
Costs paid or otherwise settled(2,093) (977) (2,731) (822) (6,623)
Balance at December 30, 2017$1,192
 $870
 $360
 $25
 $2,447
* Includes employee relocation costs

Note 10 - Leases

We have operating leases for corporate offices, sales offices, research and accelerated stock compensation

**Includes cancellationdevelopment facilities, storage facilities, and a data center, all of contracts, asset impairments,which are leased under operating leases that expire at various times through 2028.Our leases have remaining lease terms of 1 to 6 years, some of which include options to extend for up to 5 years, and accelerated depreciation on certain enterprise resource planningsome of which include options to terminate within 1 year. The weighted-average remaining lease term was 3.5 years and customer
relationship management systems


Note 16 - Long-Term Debt

On March 10, 2015, we entered into a secured credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Jefferies Finance, LLC and certain other lenders for purposesthe weighted-average discount rate was 5.4% as of funding, in part, our acquisitionDecember 31, 2022. We recorded fixed operating lease expense of Silicon Image. The Credit Agreement provided for a $350$7.6 million, term loan (the "Term Loan") maturing on March 10, 2021 (the "Term Loan Maturity Date"). We received $346.5 million net of an original issue discount of $3.5$7.9 million, and we paid debt issuance costs of $8.3 million. $7.6 million, respectively, for fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020.

The Term Loan bears variable interest equalfollowing table presents the lease balance classifications within the Consolidated Balance Sheets and summarizes their activity during fiscal 2022:

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance as of January 1, 2022

 $23,818 

Right-of-use assets obtained for new lease contracts during the period

  2,134 

Amortization of right-of-use assets during the period

  (6,512)

Impairment of right-of use asset during the period (recorded in Restructuring charges)

  (1,149)

Adjustments for present value and foreign currency effects

  (701)

Balance as of December 31, 2022

 $17,590 

Operating lease liabilities

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance as of January 1, 2022

 $24,944 

Lease liabilities incurred for new lease contracts during the period

  2,134 

Accretion of lease liabilities

  1,087 

Operating cash used by payments on lease liabilities

  (7,419)

Adjustments for present value and foreign currency effects

  (674)

Balance as of December 31, 2022

  20,072 

Less: Current portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Accrued liabilities)

  (6,454)

Long-term operating lease liabilities, net of current portion

 $13,618 

Lease obligations for facilities restructured prior to the one-month LIBOR, subjectadoption of Topic 842 totaled approximately $5.9 million at December 31, 2022 and continued to a 1.00% floor, plus a spread of 4.25%. The current effective interest rate on the Term Loan is 6.29%.


The Term Loan is payable through a combination of (i) quarterly installments of approximately $0.9 million, (ii) annual excess cash flow payments as definedbe recorded in the Credit Agreement, which are due 95 days after the last day of our fiscal year, and (iii) any payments due upon certain issuances of additional indebtedness and certain asset dispositions, with any remaining outstanding principal amount due and payable on the Term Loan Maturity Date. The percentage of excess cash flow we are required to pay ranges from 0% to 75%, depending on our leverage and other factors as defined in the Credit Agreement. Currently, the Credit Agreement would require a75%excess cash flow payment.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we made a required additional principal payment of $1.7 million due to the sale of Qterics. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we made a required additional principal payment of $9.9 million due to a sale of patents. In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we made another required additional principal payment of $8.3 million due to a sale of patents, and a required annual excess cash flow payment of $13.7 million. There were no other required principal payments outside of our quarterly installment payments. Over the next twelve months, our principal payments will be comprised mainly of regular quarterly installments. We have determined that the annual excess cash flow payment required in fiscal 2018, as calculated according to the Credit Agreement, is not material to our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 30, 2017.

While the Credit Agreement does not contain financial covenants, it does contain informational covenants and certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on liens, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, payment of dividends, and indebtedness. We were in compliance with all such covenants at December 30, 2017.

The original issue discount and the debt issuance costs have been accounted for as a reduction to the carrying value of the Term LoanOther long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized to Interest expense in our Consolidated StatementsSheets.

Maturities of Operations over the contractual term, using the effective interest method.


The fair valueoperating lease liabilities as of the Term Loan approximates the carrying value, which is reflected in our Consolidated Balance SheetsDecember 31, 2022 are as follows:
(in thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Principal amount$306,791
 $342,221
Unamortized original issue discount and debt issuance costs(5,616) (7,599)
Less: Current portion of long-term debt(1,508) (33,767)
Long-term debt$299,667
 $300,855

Interest expense related to the Term Loan was included in Interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:
   Year Ended  
(in thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Contractual interest$16,503
 $18,518
 $15,225
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount1,982
 1,350
 2,835
Total Interest expense related to the Term Loan$18,485
 $19,868
 $18,060

As of December 30, 2017, expected future principal payments on the Term Loan were as follows:
Fiscal year 
(in thousands)

   
2018 $3,500
2019 26,235
2020 59,187
2021 217,869
  $306,791


Note 17 - Common Stock Repurchase Program

Fiscal year

 

(In thousands)

 

2023

  7,536 

2024

  6,042 

2025

  4,140 

2026

  2,522 

2027

  1,110 

Thereafter

  934 

Total lease payments

  22,284 

Less: amount representing interest

  (2,212)

Total lease liabilities

 $20,072 

 
We did not repurchase any shares in either fiscal year 2017 or 2016. We most recently repurchased shares in fiscal year 2015 under a stock repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors on March 3, 2014. This 2014 program authorized the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of outstanding common stock from time to time over a period of twelve months. The 2014 program completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2015, during which approximately 1.1 million shares were repurchased for approximately $7.0 million. All shares repurchased in fiscal 2015 under the 2014 program were retired during fiscal 2015 (see our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity). All repurchases were open market transactions funded from available working capital.

Note 1811 - Stockholders' Equity

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

Employee and Director Stock Options, Restricted Stock, and ESPP


Plans

We have fourtwo active equity incentive plans, (the "1996 Stock Incentive Plan," the "2001 Stock Plan," the "20132013 Incentive Plan" and the "2011"2011 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan"). Awards granted, under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2001 Stock Plan remain outstanding, but nowhich shares are available for future awards under these plans. Shares remain available for grants to employees and non-employee directors, only underrespectively. In addition, we have made grants of inducement awards to certain executives and employees that are granted outside of, but governed by, the 2013 Incentive Plan and the 2011 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan, respectively.Plan. "Incentive stock options" under Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and restricted stock unit ("RSU") grants are part of our equity compensation practices for employees who receive equity grants. Options and RSUs generally vest quarterly over a four-yearfour-year period beginning on the grant date. The contractual terms of options granted do not exceed ten years.

51


In May 2012, the Company's stockholders approved the 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("("2012 ESPP"), which authorizes the issuance of 3.0 million shares of common stock to eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock through payroll deductions, which cannot exceed 10% of an employee's compensation. The purchase price of the shares is the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the stock at the beginning of each six-monthsix-month offering period or 85% of the fair market value at the end of such period. During fiscal 2017 only, the ESPP was suspended. We have treated the 2012 ESPP as a compensatory plan. We recorded no related compensation expense in fiscal 2017, and related compensation expense of $0.6 million and $0.4 million for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively.


At December 30, 2017,31, 2022, a total of 3.61.0 million shares of our common stock were available for future purchases under the 2012 ESPP.

At December 31, 2022, a total of 5.0 million shares of our common stock were available for future grants under the 2013 Incentive Plan and the 2011 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan. Following our 2018 Shareholder meeting, a share ratio of 2.2:1 was applied to the 2013 Incentive Plan. This ratio takes two and two-tenths shares out of the 2013 Plan for every one full value share granted. During fiscal 2022, a total of 2.5 million shares were adjusted out of the 2013 Plan. Shares subject to stock option grants that expire or are canceled, without delivery of such shares, generally become available for re-issuance under equity incentive plans. At December 30, 2017, a total of 1.9 million shares of our common stock were available for future purchases under the 2012 ESPP. On March 10, 2015, in conjunction with the acquisition of Silicon Image, we assumed certain outstanding stock option and RSU grants of the Silicon Image Equity Incentive Plans. We assumed all stock option grants that were unvested or vested and out-of-the-money and all outstanding unvested RSU grants. The exchange ratio for the conversion was 1.09816 for all grants. The conversion ratio was determined by the weighted average closing price of Lattice common stock for the ten days prior to the acquisition date divided by the offer price of $7.30. The converted outstanding option grants totaled 2,087,605 shares and converted RSU grants totaled 2,025,255 shares as of March 10, 2015. As of December 30, 2017, 275,991 options and 30,679 RSU shares arising from this conversion remained outstanding.


Stock-Based Compensation


Expense

Total stock-based compensation expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented in the following table:

  Year Ended
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Cost of products sold $795
 $888
 $1,416
Research and development 5,245
 7,928
 9,141
Selling, general, and administrative 6,503
 7,397
 6,793
Acquisition related charges 
 
 4,293
Total stock-based compensation $12,543
 $16,213
 $21,643

Of the $21.6 million total stock-based compensation for the twelve months ended January 2, 2016, $3.9 million was paid in cash during the period as a result of the acquisition of Silicon Image on March 10, 2015.


ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”),” requires that we recognize compensation expense for only the portion of employee

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

January 1,

  

January 2,

 

(In thousands)

 

2022

  

2022

  

2021

 

Cost of revenue

 $3,674  $3,049  $3,179 

Research and development

  19,645   14,563   10,124 

Selling, general, and administrative

  32,211   28,863   27,069 

Total stock-based compensation

 $55,530  $46,475  $40,372 

ESPP and director options and ESPP rights that are expected to vest.


Stock Options

The fair values of each option award on the date of grant and of the shares expected to be issued under the employee stock purchase plan areand of each option award on the date of grant were estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the assumptions noted in the following table.No new stock options were granted during fiscal 2022,2021, or 2020. The expected volatility of both ESPP shares and stock options is based on the daily historical volatility of our stock price, measured over the ESPP purchase period or the expected term of the option. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining term closest to the expected term of the option. The expected term is based on historical vested option exercises and includes an estimate of the expected term for options that are fully vested and outstanding. The expected volatility of both stock options and ESPP shares is based on the daily historical volatility of our stock price, measured over the expected term of the option or the ESPP purchase period. The risk-free interest rate is based on the impliedDividend yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining term closest to the expected term of the option. The dividend yield reflects thathas no valuation impact, as we have not paid any cash dividends since inception and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.


The following table summarizes the assumptions used in the valuation of stockESPP compensation for the periods presented:

  

Year Ended

  

December 31,

 

January 1,

 

January 2,

  

2022

 

2022

 

2021

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

      

Weighted average expected volatility

 

60.3%

 

39.9%

 

48.2%

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

 

3.74%

 

0.07%

 

0.89%

Expected term (in months)

 

6

 

6

 

6

The weighted average fair values for the ESPP, calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the noted assumptions for the ESPP, were $15.25, $13.04, and ESPP compensation:

 Year Ended
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Employee and Director Stock Options     
Expected volatility40.96% to 48.01% 44.2% to 50.8% 43.6% to 47.3%
Risk-free interest rate1.99% to 2.09% .94% to 2.06% 1.4% to 1.7%
Expected term (years)4.08 to 4.25 4.06 to 4.78 4.08 to 4.75
Dividend yield—% —% —%
Employee Stock Purchase Plan *     
Weighted average expected volatility—% 57.9% 33.6%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate—% 0.43% 0.12%
Expected termN/A 6 months 6 months
Dividend yield—% —% —%
      
* ESPP suspended during fiscal 2017 only

$6.62 for fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.

At December 30, 2017, 31, 2022, there was $12.4 million of totalno unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested employee and director stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.8 years. Our current practice is to issue new shares to satisfy option exercises.options. Compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards is recognized using the straight-line method. We recorded stock compensation expense related to the ESPP of approximately $1.5 million, $1.2 million, and $1.0 million in fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Related to stock options, we recorded no expense in fiscal 2022, and approximately $1.0 million and $2.0 million, in fiscal 2021 and 2020, respectively.

52


The following table summarizes our stock option activity and related information for the year ended December 30, 2017:

(Shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands)Shares Weighted
average
exercise price
 Weighted average
remaining
contractual term (years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Balance, December 31, 201612,566
 $5.70
    
Granted3,732
 5.73
    
Exercised(1,803) 5.07
    
Forfeited or expired(1,556) 6.00
    
Balance, December 30, 201712,939
 $5.77
    
Vested and expected to vest at December 30, 201712,939
 $5.77
 4.47 $3,333
Exercisable, December 30, 20176,601
 $5.81
 2.87 $2,485

31, 2022:

(Shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands)

 

Shares

  

Weighted average exercise price

  

Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)

  

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

 

Balance, January 1, 2022

  1,367  $6.62         

Granted

              

Exercised

  (448)  6.48         

Forfeited or expired

  (1)  5.01         

Balance, December 31, 2022

  918  $6.70         

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2022

  918  $6.70   1.93  $53,433 

Exercisable, December 31, 2022

  918  $6.70   1.93  $53,433 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company's closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal year and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on that day. This amount changes based on the fair market value of the Company's stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised for fiscal 2017, 20162022, 2021, and 2015, and2020 was $2.2$24.3 million, $3.3$44.7 million, and $2.5$21.5 million, respectively. The total fair value of options and RSUs vested and expensed in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 and was $12.5 million, $15.6 million and $18.0 million, respectively.



The resultant grant date weighted-average fair values for stock options granted, calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the noted assumptions for stock options, were $2.02, $2.14 and $2.35 for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The weighted average fair values for the ESPP, calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the noted assumptions for the ESPP, were $0.00, $1.82 and $1.51 for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards

The following table summarizes the activity for our RSU activitytime-based RSUs for the year ended December 30, 2017:

(Shares in thousands)Shares Weighted average grant date fair value
Balance, December 31, 20163,247
 $5.90
Granted1,530
 5.83
Exercised(1,478) 5.95
Forfeited or expired(533) 5.84
Balance, December 30, 20172,766
 $5.85

31, 2022:

(Shares in thousands)

 

Shares

  

Weighted average grant date fair value

 

Balance, January 1, 2022

  2,188  $31.85 

Granted

  843   62.23 

Vested

  (1,132)  24.34 

Forfeited or expired

  (78)  41.21 

Balance, December 31, 2022

  1,821  $50.18 

At December 30, 2017 31, 2022, there was $14.4$81.6 million of total unrecognized compensation costexpense related to unvested time-based RSUs. Our current practice is to issue new shares when RSUs vest. Compensation expense for RSUs is recognized using the straight-line method over the related vesting period.


In fiscal years 20152022, 2021, and 2020, we recorded stock compensation expense related to time-based RSUs of approximately $30.1 million, $21.7 million, and $16.6 million, respectively.

Market-Based and Performance-Based Awards

In 2020 through 2017,2022, we granted stock optionsawards of RSUs with either a market condition or a performance condition to certain executives.

Market-Based and Performance-Based Awards — Grants

In the first quarters of fiscal 2022,2021 and 2020,we granted awards of RSUs with a market condition to certain executives. The options haveUnder the terms of these grants, the RSUs with a two year vesting andmarket condition vest between 0% and 200% of the target amount,over a three-year period based on the Company's Company’s total shareholder return ("TSR") relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) whento the Russell 2000 index, which condition is measured for the 2022 and 2021grants on the third anniversary of the grant date, and measured for one-half of the 2020 grants on the second and third anniversary of the grant date. The awards may vest at 250% or 200%, depending upon the executive, if the 75th percentile of the market condition is achieved, with 100% of the units vesting at the 55th percentile, zero vesting if relative TSR is below the 25th percentile, and vesting scaling for achievement between the 25th and 75th percentile.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2021, we also granted awards of RSUs with a performance condition to certain executives, to specifically drive additional executive attention and focus on the Company’s revenue growth priorities. Under the terms of these grants, the RSUs with a performance condition will vest based on the Company generating specified levels of year-over-year revenue growth, which will be measured annually for one-fourth of the grants after each fiscal year-end through the end of fiscal 2024. Vesting of these awards scales for achievement of year-over-year revenue growth compared to certain targets, with maximum vesting up to 200%. Vesting of each tranche of these awards occurs 13 months after the performance conditions is met, and the entire award cannot be fully earned until five years from grant. For the first and second tranches of these awards, the Company had met the year-over-year revenue growth performance criteria at the 200% level of achievement as of January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, respectively.

53

Market-Based and Performance-Based Awards — Vesting

During fiscal 2022, the market condition for awards granted to certain executives in previous years exceeded the 75th percentile of their TSR condition, and applicable tranches of these awards vested at 250% or 200% for the respective executives. Also during fiscal 2022, the fifth and sixth tranches of 40% and 70%, respectively, of the base number of the awards with an EBITDA performance condition vested, as the Company had met the adjusted EBITDA performance criteria on a trailing four-quarter basis for two consecutive trailing four-quarter periods as of the end of the respective measurement periods.
During fiscal 2021, the market condition for awards granted to certain executives in previous years exceeded the 75th percentile of their TSR condition, and applicable tranches of these awards vested at 250% or 200% for the respective executives. Also during fiscal 2021, the second and third tranches, each 33.3% of the base number of the awards with an EBITDA performance condition vested and released, as the Company had met the adjusted EBITDA performance criteria on a trailing four-quarter basis for two consecutive trailing four-quarter periods as of the end of the respective measurement periods. Additionally, as of January 1, 2022, the Company had met the next adjusted EBITDA performance criteria on a trailing four-quarter basis for two consecutive trailing four-quarter periods, and the fourth tranche of the awards with an EBITDA performance condition qualified for vesting at 40% of the base number.
During fiscal 2020, the market condition for awards granted to certain executives in previous years exceeded the 75th percentile of their TSR condition, and annual tranches of these awards vested at 250% or 200%, and applicable tranches of these awards vested at 250% or 200% for the respective executives. Also during fiscal 2020, the first tranche of 33.3% of the base number of the awards with an EBITDA performance condition vested, as the Company had met the adjusted EBITDA performance criteria on a trailing four-quarter basis for two consecutive trailing four-quarter periods as of the end of the measurement period.
Market-Based and Performance-Based Awards — Compensation Expense
During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Board of Directors approved a modification to the market condition measurement periods associated with the unvested portions of certain of the Company’s awards with a market condition that were granted prior to fiscal 2020. The modification extended the duration of the measurement period by adjusting the beginning date of each measurement period to the original grant date, resulting in approximately $1.8 million additional stock compensation expense during the first quarter of fiscal 2020.

For our awards with a market condition or a performance condition, we incurred stock compensation expense, including the effect of the modification in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, of approximately $24.0 million, $22.1 million, and $20.8 million in fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, which is recorded as a component of companiestotal stock-based compensation. At December 31, 2022, there was $21.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs with a market condition or a performance condition. Awards with a TSR market condition were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model.

The following table summarizes the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index over a two year period. TSR is a measure of stock price appreciation plus dividends paid, if any,assumptions used at the grant date in the valuation of RSUs with a market or performance period. The fair values of the options and RSUs were determined and fixed on the date of grant using a lattice-based option-pricing valuation model incorporating a Monte-Carlo simulation and a consideration of the likelihood that we would achieve the market condition.


condition:

  

Year Ended

  

December 31,

 

January 1,

 

January 2,

  

2022

 

2022

 

2021

Executive RSUs with a market condition or performance condition

      

Weighted average expected volatility

 

51.44%

 

50.37% to 52.11%

 

42.38%

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

 

1.67%

 

0.22% to 0.77%

 

1.40%

Expected term (years)

 

3.00

 

3.00 to 5.00

 

3.00

The following table summarizes the activity for our stock options with a market condition:

(Shares in thousands) Unvested Vested Total
Balance, December 31, 2016 597
 
 597
Granted 475
 
 475
Vested (92) 92
 
Exercised 
 (9) (9)
Canceled (273) 
 (273)
Balance, December 30, 2017 707
 83
 790

Additionally, we granted 70 thousand RSUsawards with a market condition or performance condition:

(Shares in thousands)

 

Shares

  

Weighted average grant date fair value

 

Balance, January 1, 2022

  1,246  $41.23 

Granted

  183   96.63 

Effect of vesting multiplier

  642    

Vested

  (1,086)  20.38 

Balance, December 31, 2022

  985  $60.15 

54

Note 12 - Common Stock Repurchase Program

On August 8, 2022, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which up to $150 million of outstanding common stock could be repurchased from time to time (the "2023 Repurchase Program"). The duration of the 2023 Repurchase Program is through the end of December 2023. Under the 2023 Repurchase Program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, we repurchased 288,652 shares for $20.0 million, or an average price paid per share of $69.27. All repurchases were open market transactions funded from available working capital. All shares repurchased pursuant to the 2023 Repurchase Program were retired by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the remaining portion of the amount authorized for the 2023 Repurchase Program is approximately $129.7 million. We repurchased a certain executivetotal of 1,951,934 shares for $110.1 million, or an average price paid per share of $56.42, during fiscal year 2022.

Note 13 - Income Taxes

We are subject to federal and state income tax as well as income tax in fiscal 2015. These RSUs had the same market conditionvarious foreign jurisdictions in which we operate.

The domestic and foreign components of Income before income taxes were as follows:

  

Year Ended

 
  December 31,  January 1,  January 2, 

(In thousands)

 2022  2022  2021 

Domestic

 $30,362  $24,003  $11,772 

Foreign

  151,750   73,623   36,684 

Income before taxes

 $182,112  $97,626  $48,456 

The components of Income tax expense are as follows:

  

Year Ended

 
  December 31,  January 1,  January 2, 

(In thousands)

 2022  2022  2021 

Current:

            

Federal

 $748  $445  $54 

State

  265   45   68 

Foreign

  3,637   1,538   1,025 
   4,650   2,028   1,147 

Deferred:

            

Federal

         

State

         

Foreign

  (1,420)  (324)  (83)
   (1,420)  (324)  (83)

Income tax expense

 $3,230  $1,704  $1,064 

55

Income tax expense differs from the stock options above amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to pretax income as a result of the following differences:

  

Year Ended

 
  December 31,  January 1,  January 2, 
  2022  2022  2021 
  

%

  

%

  

%

 

Statutory federal rate

 

21

  

21

  

21

 

Adjustments for tax effects of:

         

State taxes, net

 

(2)

  

(4)

  

(4)

 

Federal tax credits

 

(1)

  

(3)

  

(3)

 

Excess tax benefit from stock compensation

 

  

(8)

  

(10)

 

Foreign rate differential

 

(16)

  

(14)

  

(12)

 

U.S. tax on foreign operations

 

33

  

3

  

15

 

Foreign withholding taxes

 

1

  

1

  

3

 

Capital loss expiration

 

1

  

3

  

 

Other deferred tax asset adjustment

 

  

  

3

 

Valuation allowance

 

(33)

  

8

  

(13)

 

Change in uncertain tax benefit accrual

 

(2)

  

(5)

  2 

Effective income tax rate

 

2

  

2

  

2

 

We updated our evaluation of the valuation allowance position in the United States through December 31, 2022 and were canceledconcluded that we should continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against the net federal and state deferred tax assets. In making this evaluation, we considered the uncertain stability of the current economic and operating environment and estimates about our ability to generate taxable income in fiscal 2016 duefuture periods within the United States. We will continue to termination.


evaluate both positive and negative evidence in future periods to determine if we will realize the net deferred tax assets. We incurred stock compensation expensedon't have a valuation allowance in any foreign jurisdictions as we have concluded it is more likely than not that we will realize the net deferred tax assets in future periods.

The components of our net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

(In thousands)

 December 31, 2022  January 1, 2022 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Intangible assets

 $6,264  $8,236 

Net operating loss carry forwards

  15,362   88,254 

Tax credit carry forwards

  103,092   93,095 

Accrued liabilities and reserves

  12,932   6,590 

Stock-based and deferred compensation

  3,769   4,477 

Other

  5,031   6,615 

Total deferred tax assets

  146,450   207,267 

Less: valuation allowance

  (140,533)  (200,438)

Net deferred tax assets

  5,917   6,829 

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Fixed assets

  2,058   2,379 

Unremitted earnings

  2,498   2,128 

Other

  8,134   9,969 

Total deferred tax liabilities

  12,690   14,476 

Net deferred taxes

 $(6,773) $(7,647)
         

Reported as:

        

Deferred tax assets (included in Other long-term assets)

 $1,022  $953 

Deferred tax liabilities (included in Other long-term liabilities)

  (7,795)  (8,600)

Net deferred taxes

 $(6,773) $(7,647)

56

The following table displays the activity related to these stock option and RSU market condition awardschanges in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets:

Fiscal Years Ended

 

Balance at beginning

  

Charged (Credit) to costs and

  

Charged (credit) to other

  

Balance at end of

 

(In thousands)

 of period  expenses  accounts  period 

December 31, 2022

 $200,438  $(59,905) $  $140,533 

January 1, 2022

 $192,478  $7,960  $  $200,438 

January 2, 2021

 $198,499  $(6,021) $  $192,478 

At December 31, 2022, we had U.S. federal net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards (pretax) of approximately $0.5$16.3 million $0.8which do not expire. We had state NOL carryforwards (pretax) of approximately $142.0 million that substantially all expire at various dates from 2023 through 2041. We also had federal credit carryforwards of $59.1 million that expire at various dates from 2023 through 2042, and $75.0 million state credit carryforwards, of which substantially all do not expire.

Future utilization of federal and state net operating losses and tax credit carry forwards may be limited if cumulative changes to ownership exceed 50% within any three-year period. However, if there is a significant change in ownership, future tax attribute utilization may be limited and NOL carryforwards and/or R&D credits will be reduced to reflect the limitation.

Foreign earnings may be subject to withholding taxes in local jurisdictions if they are distributed. At December 31, 2022, U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes were not provided for on a cumulative total of approximately $3.0 million of the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. We intend to reinvest these earnings indefinitely.

At December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022, our unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions were $58.9 million and $0.6$56.2 million, respectively, of which $56.3 million and $54.0 million, respectively, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, subject to valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022, interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits were $10.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, which are not reflected in the table below. We accrue interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in Income tax expense.

The following table summarizes the changes to unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years 2017, 2016,presented:

  

(In thousands)

 

Balance at December 28, 2019

 $56,962 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

  548 

Additions based on tax positions of prior years

  628 

Reduction for tax positions of prior years

   

Reduction as a result of lapse of applicable statute of limitations

  (2,401)

Balance at January 2, 2021

  55,737 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

  1,156 

Additions based on tax positions of prior years

  1,130 

Additions due to acquisition

  977 

Settlements

  (51)

Reduction as a result of lapse of applicable statute of limitations

  (2,718)

Balance at January 1, 2022

  56,231 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

  1,594 

Additions based on tax positions of prior years

  2,798 

Settlements

  (148)

Reduction as a result of lapse of applicable statute of limitations

  (1,586)

Balance at December 31, 2022

 $58,889 

Our liability for uncertain tax positions (including penalties and 2015, respectively, whichinterest) was $21.6 million at both December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022 and is recorded as a component of total optionsOther long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remainder of our uncertain tax position exposure of $47.9 million and RSU expense.$44.2 million at December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022, respectively, is netted against deferred tax assets.

At December 31, 2022, it is reasonably possible that $1.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits and $0.2 million of associated interest and penalties could be recognized during the next twelve months.

57


The following table summarizesyears that remain subject to examination are 2017 for federal and state income taxes, and 2016 for foreign income taxes, including years ending thereafter. However, to the assumptions used inextent allowed by law, the valuationtax authorities may have the right to examine prior periods where net operating losses or tax credits were generated and carried forward, and make adjustments up to the amount of stock options and RSUs with a market condition:the net operating losses or credit carryforward amount. Our Singapore 2020 income tax return is currently under examination.

 Year Ended
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Executive stock options with a market condition     
Expected volatility41% 46% 44% to 46%
Risk-free interest rate1.9% 1.1% 1.4%
Expected term (years)4.5 4.5 4.5
Dividend yield—% —% —%
Executive RSUs with a market condition     
Expected volatilityn/a n/a 36.9%
Risk-free interest raten/a n/a 0.6%
Expected term (years)n/a n/a 2.0
Dividend yieldn/a n/a —%


Note 1914 - Employee Benefit Plans


Qualified Investment Plan


In 1990, we adopted a 401(k)401(k) tax-deferred savings plan, which provides participantsall employees in the United States who meet certain eligibility requirements with an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. Participants may contribute up to the amount allowable as a deduction for federal income tax purposes. The plan does not allow investments in the Company's common stock. The plan allows for the Company to make discretionary matching contributions in cash. We recorded matching contributions of approximately $0.8$2.8 million, $2.6 million, and $2.4 million in fiscal 2017,years 2022, 2021, and of approximately $0.9 million in each of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015.


2017 2020, respectively.

Cash Incentive Plan


On December 20, 2016,Plans

For 2022, 2021, and 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the 2017 Cash Incentive Plan (the “2017 Cash Plan”“Cash Plans”). for the respective fiscal year. The chief executive officer, other executive officers, and other members of senior management, including vice presidents and director-level employees, together with all other employees of the Company not on the Company's sales incentive plan are eligible to participate in the 2017 Cash Plan.Plans. Under the 2017 Cash Plan,Plans, individual cash incentive payments for the eligible employees will be based both on Company financial performance, as measured by achievement of operating income (before incentive plan accruals) and revenue goals within specified ranges established by the Compensation Committee, and Company performance, as measured by the achievement of personal management objectives. The Compensation Committee determines the performance of the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and other participants based on the achievement of the management objectives established by the Compensation Committee during the first fiscal quarter of 2017. There was $7.2the respective fiscal year. We recorded approximately $25.2 million, $18.0 million, and $7.9 million of expense recorded under this planthe Cash Plans in fiscal 2017.2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.


2016 Cash Incentive Plan

Note 15 - Contingencies

Legal Matters

On or about December 21, 2015, upon19, 2018, Steven A.W. De Jaray, Perienne De Jaray and Darrell R. Oswald (collectively, the recommendation“Plaintiffs”) commenced an action against the Company and several unnamed defendants in the Multnomah County Circuit Court of the Compensation Committee,State of Oregon, in connection with the Boardsale of Directorscertain products by the Company to the Plaintiffs in or around 2008. The Plaintiffs allege that we violated The Lanham Act, engaged in negligence and fraud by failing to disclose to the Plaintiffs the export-controlled status of the Company approved the 2016 Cash Incentive Plan (the “2016 Cash Plan”).subject parts. The chief executive officer, other executive officers,Plaintiffs seek damages of $155 million to $268 million, treble damages, and other membersremedies. In January 2019, we removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of senior management, including vice presidents and director-level employees, together with all other employeesOregon. At this stage of the Company proceedings, we do not on the Company's sales incentive plan are eligible to participate in the 2016 Cash Plan. Under the 2016 Cash Plan, individual cash incentive payments for the eligible employees will be based both on Company financial performance, as measured by achievement of operating income (before incentive plan accruals) and revenue goals within specified ranges established by the Compensation Committee, and Company performance, as measured by the achievement of personal management objectives. The Compensation Committee determines the performance have an estimate of the chief executive officer,likelihood or the chief financial officeramount of any potential exposure to the Company; however, we believe that these claims are without merit and other participants based onintend to vigorously defend the achievement of the management objectives established by the Compensation Committee during the first fiscal quarter of 2016. There was $4.7 million of expense recorded under this plan in fiscal 2016.


2015 Cash Incentive Plan

On December 4, 2014, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the 2015 Cash Incentive Plan (the “2015 Cash Plan”). The chief executive officer, other executive officers, and other members of senior management, including vice presidents and director-level employees, together with all other employees of the Company not on the Company's sales incentive plan were eligible to participate in the 2015 Cash Plan. Under the 2015 Cash Plan, individual cash incentive payments for the eligible employees were based both on Company financial performance, as measured by achievement of operating income (before incentive plan accruals) and revenue goals within specified ranges established by the Compensation Committee, and Company performance, as measured by the achievement of personal management objectives. The Compensation Committee determined the performance of the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and other participants based on the achievement of the management objectives established by the Compensation Committee during the first fiscal quarter of 2015. There was $1.0 million of expense recorded under this plan in fiscal 2015.


Note 20 - Contingencies

Legal Matters

action.

From time to time, we are exposed to certain additional asserted and unasserted potential claims. Periodically, weWe review the status of each significant matter and assess its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and a range of possible losses can be estimated, we then accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to pending claims and litigation and may revise estimates.

58


Other Matters

Note 21 - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

The following table displays the activity related to changes in our valuation and qualifying accounts:
(In thousands)Balance at
beginning of
period
 Balance received through acquisition Charged (Credit) to
costs and
expenses
 Charged (credit) to
other accounts
 Settlements & write-offs
net of
recoveries
 Balance at end
of period
Fiscal year ended December 30, 2017           
Allowance for deferred taxes260,687
 
 (50,960) (36) 
 209,691
Allowance for doubtful accounts9,299
 
 3
 38
 31
 9,371
Allowance for warranty expense352
 
 100
 
 (197) 255
 $270,338
 $
 $(50,857) $2
 $(166) $219,317
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016           
Allowance for deferred taxes$252,578
 $
 $7,450
 $659
 $
 $260,687
Allowance for doubtful accounts621
 
 7,362
 2,284
 (968) 9,299
Allowance for warranty expense370
 
 216
 
 (234) 352
 $253,569
 $
 $15,028
 $2,943
 $(1,202) $270,338
Fiscal year ended January 2, 2016           
Allowance for deferred taxes$141,215
 $52,481
 $58,658
 $224
 $
 $252,578
Allowance for doubtful accounts875
 
 (438) 189
 (5) 621
Allowance for warranty expense81
 136
 153
 
 
 370
 $142,171
 $52,617
 $58,373
 $413
 $(5) $253,569


Note 22 - Segment and Geographic Information

Segment Information

As of December 30, 2017, we had one operating segment: the core Lattice business, which includes IP and semiconductor devices. Qterics, a discrete software-as-a-service business unit, was previously an immaterial operating segment in the Lattice legal entity structure prior to the sale of Qterics in April 2016.

Geographic Information

Our revenue by major geographic area, based on ship-to location, is presented in the following table:
  Year Ended
(In thousands) December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
United States: $48,315
 13% $51,752
 12% $33,677
 8%
             
China* 193,590
 50 186,865
 44 165,582
 41
Europe 44,547
 12 59,835
 14 55,596
 14
Japan 42,286
 11 49,080
 12 44,067
 11
Taiwan 14,846
 4 31,322
 7 31,181
 8
Other Asia* 26,916
 7 37,826
 9 67,704
 17
Other Americas 15,461
 4 10,374
 3 8,159
 2
Total foreign revenue 337,646
 87 375,302
 88 372,289
 92
Total revenue $385,961
 100% $427,054
 100% $405,966
 100%
* During 2017, we realigned our geographic categories to group Hong Kong with China rather than with Other Asia. Prior periods have been
reclassified to match current period presentation.

We assign revenue to geographies based on the customer ship-to address at the point where revenue is recognized. In the case of sell-in distributors and OEM customers, revenue is typically recognized, and geography is assigned, when products are shipped to our distributor or customer. In the case of sell-through distributors, revenue is recognized when resale occurs and geography is assigned based on the customer location on the resale reports provided by the distributor.

Our Property and equipment, net by country at the end of each period was as follows:
(In thousands)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
United States$30,338
 $30,532
 $25,615
      
China4,632
 10,617
 14,998
Philippines3,883
 4,928
 3,948
Taiwan958
 2,310
 3,677
India
 215
 1,470
Japan313
 637
 1,211
Other299
 242
 933
Total foreign property and equipment, net10,085
 18,949
 26,237
Total property and equipment, net$40,423
 $49,481
 $51,852


Revenue by Distributors

Our largest customers are often distributors and sales through distributors have historically made up a significant portion of our total revenue. Revenue attributable to resale of products by our primary distributors as a percentage of total revenue is presented in the following table:
 % of Total Revenue in Year Ended
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 January 2, 2016
Arrow Electronics Inc.24% 24% 20%
Weikeng Group27
 22
 12
All others15
 15
 13
All sell-through distributors66% 61% 45%

Orders from our sell-through distributors are initially recorded at published list prices; however, for a majority of our sales, the final selling price is determined at the time of resale and in accordance with a distributor price agreement. For this reason, we do not recognize revenue until products are resold by sell-through distributors to an end customer. In certain circumstances, we allow sell-through distributors to return unsold products. At times, we protect our sell-through distributors against reductions in published list prices.

Note 23 - Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

A summary of the Company's consolidated quarterly results of operations is as follows:
  2017 2016
(In thousands, except per share data) Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Revenue $95,266
 $91,971
 $94,137
 $104,587
 $118,108
 $113,225
 $99,209
 $96,512
Gross margin 51,216
 53,322
 51,209
 60,832
 63,480
 67,424
 58,426
 57,104
Restructuring charges 2,483
 3,071
 1,576
 66
 951
 317
 2,568
 5,431
Net loss $(7,213) $(43,052) $(13,022) $(7,275) $(8,164) $(12,414) $(13,810) $(19,711)
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $(0.06) $(0.35) $(0.11) $(0.06) $(0.07) $(0.10) $(0.12) $(0.17)



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation:

Corporation

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 30, 201731, 2022 and December 31, 2016,January 1, 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the three‑year period ended December 30, 2017,31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated“consolidated financial statements)statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 30, 2017 andat December 31, 2016,2022 and January 1, 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the three‑year periodperiods ended December 30, 2017,31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 13, 2018February 17, 2023 expressed an adverseunqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


thereon.

Basis for Opinion


These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidatedthe Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Inventory Valuation
Description of the Matter

The Company's net inventory totaled $110.4 million as of December 31, 2022. As explained in “Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” within the consolidated financial statements, the Company records inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value, and writes down inventories to net realizable value if it is obsolete or if quantities are in excess of projected customer demand.

Auditing management’s estimates of excess and obsolete inventory was challenging because the estimate is judgmental and considers a number of factors that are affected by market and economic conditions that are outside of the Company’s control. In particular, excess and obsolete inventory calculations are sensitive to significant assumptions that relate to projected customer demand for the Company’s products.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We evaluated and tested the design and operating effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over the calculation of excess and obsolete inventory, including the determination of projected customer demand and related application against on-hand inventory.

Our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the significant assumptions stated above and the underlying data used in management's excess and obsolete inventory assessment. We evaluated inventory levels compared to projected customer demand, historical sales, and specific product considerations. We also assessed the historical accuracy of management's estimates and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the changes in inventory valuation that would result from changes in significant assumptions.

/s/ KPMGErnst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.2020.

San Jose, California

February 17, 2023


Portland, Oregon
March 13, 2018


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation:

Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


We have audited Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and subsidiaries’(the Company)Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, because of the effect of theLattice Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material weakness, described below, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintainedrespects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheetssheet of the Company as of December 30, 201731, 2022 and December 31, 2016,January 1, 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2017,31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated March 13, 2018February 17, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management concluded there is a material weakness due to ineffective risk assessment over significant unusual transactions and the design and implementation of control activities over the accounting for those significant unusual transactions. The material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2017 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those consolidated financial statements.

thereon.

Basis for Opinion


The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also includedrisk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



/s/ KPMGErnst & Young LLP

San Jose, California

February 17, 2023

60


Portland, Oregon
March 13, 2018

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure


None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


In connection with the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 30, 2017. We seek to design our31, 2022. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assuranceensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act contain the required informationis recorded, processed, summarized and that we submit these reportsreported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. We also seek to design theseOur disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that we accumulate and communicate correct information to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Based on thethis evaluation, of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 30, 2017, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls were notare effective based on the material weakness discussed in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting described below. Notwithstanding such material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, our management concluded that the consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

December 31, 2022.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.


Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:


(i)

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

(ii)

(ii)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

(iii)

(iii)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


A material weakness is a deficiency,

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or a combination of deficiencies, inour internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and may not prevent or detect misstatements.


Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the company'sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017.31, 2022. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management identified the control deficiencies described below.


We did not conduct an effective risk assessment over significant unusual transactions and as a result, did not design and implement control activities over the accounting for those significant unusual transactions. These deficiencies could impact any of the amounts reported in our financial statements.



The control deficiencies resulted in certain immaterial misstatements, which were corrected in the consolidated financial statementsconcluded that, as of and forDecember 31, 2022, the year ended December 30, 2017 prior to issuance as well as other immaterial misstatements that were not corrected. Because the control deficiencies create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, they represent a material weakness and accordingly, management concluded itsCompany's internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 30, 2017.

KPMGeffective.

Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting and because of the material weakness described above, has issued an adverseits opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page 8460 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

61

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Other than the material weakness described in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and as described above, there

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Remediation Steps We do not believe there has been any material impact to Address Material Weakness

Management, and the Company’s Board of Directors, is focused on improving the Company’s processes and internal controls. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, has directed management to proceed with a remediation plan. The following actions and plans have been or are currently being implemented:

Establish regular technical accounting reviews involving the Corporate Controller, CFO, and other staff as appropriate to ensure an effective risk assessment is performed to identify and assess changes within the business and external environment that may impact financial reporting.
As changes are identified we will design and implement control activities on a timely basis.
The Disclosure Committee, a senior management committee, will meet routinely before and during the quarterly and annual close cycles to identify and assess unique or non-recurring transactions or events, the accounting for these matters, and associated relevant risk assessments.
The Disclosure Committee membership will be expanded to ensure comprehensive representation from throughout the Company’s operations.
Continued risk assessment of the accounting implications as warranted with the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has directed management to develop a detailed plan and timetable for the implementation of remedial measures and will monitor their implementation. In addition, under the direction of the Audit Committee, management will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of the Company's internal control environment as well as policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Management believes the measures described above and others that will be implemented will remediate the control deficiency identified and will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. Management is committed to continuous improvement of the Company's internal control processes and will continue to diligently review our financial reporting controls and procedures. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve internal control over financial reporting we may take additional measuresnotwithstanding that most of our employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to monitor and assess the COVID-19 situation on our internal controls to address control deficiencies or determine to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described above.

any potential impact on their design and operating effectiveness.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

62


None.

PART III



Certain information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we will file not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. With the exception of the information expressly incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement, the Proxy Statement is not to be deemed filed as a part of this report.


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information regarding our directors that is required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained under the captions “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance and Other Matters--Board Meetings and Committees” in the Proxy Statement. Information regarding our executive officers that is required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained under the caption "Proposal 2: Executive"Executive Compensation--The Executive Officers of the Company” in the Proxy Statement.


Information regarding Section 16(a) reporting compliance that is required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement.


We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of our directors, employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions.functions, consultants, contractors, and agents. The Code of Conduct is posted on our website at www.latticesemi.com. There were no changeswww.latticesemi.com. In fiscal 2022, we rescinded our Director Code of Ethics and  expanded our Code of Conduct to cover directors, consultants, and agents. In addition, we revised our codeCode of Conduct to provide general guidance on how to handle ethical business decisions, and to expand and/or clarify provisions in the Code of Conduct related to antitrust, conflicts of interest, improper conduct during fiscal 2017.and activities, and public disclosures. We also revised our Corporate Governance Policies to incorporate any items previously addressed in the Director Code of Conduct that the revised Code of Conduct did not address. Amendments to the Code of Conduct or any grant of a waiver from a provision of the codeCode of ethicsConduct requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules, if any, will be disclosed on our website at www.latticesemi.com.


www.latticesemi.com.

Information about our “Director Code of Ethics”Corporate Governance Policies and written committee charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee are available free of charge on the Company's website at www.latticesemi.com and are available in print to any shareholder upon request.


On February 3, 2018, our Board of Directors determined to extend to March 2, 2018, the deadline under the Company’s bylaws for stockholders to nominate directors and propose other business for consideration at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as announced in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 8, 2018. Other than this extension of the nomination period, there have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors were described in detail in the information concerning our Nominating and Governance Committee under the caption “Board Meetings and Committees” in our Proxy Statement filed April 28, 2017.

Information regarding our Audit Committee that is required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the information concerning our Audit Committee contained under the caption “Corporate Governance and Other Matters--Board Meetings and Committees” in the Proxy Statement.


Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information contained under the captions “Executive Compensation,” "Director Compensation," “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information contained under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


Mr. Brian Beattie was appointed to our Board effective July 3, 2016. He served as the Executive Vice President, Business Operations, and Chief Administrative Officer of Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") through May 1, 2017, and then served as an advisor until his official retirement from Synopsys on December 22, 2017. During the years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and January 2, 2016, we paid approximately $2.1 million, $2.5 million, and $2.4 million, respectively, to Synopsys for new and renewed license arrangements. Subsequent to July 3, 2016, we have paid Synopsys $3.5 million. We had no accounts payable to Synopsys at December 30, 2017. Mr. Beattie received no direct compensation from the transactions. In addition, the

The information contained under the captions entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Other Matters--Director Independence” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information contained under the caption entitled “Audit“Proposal 5: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm--Audit and Related Fees” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

63



Item 15. Exhibits.

Exhibits

(a) List of Documents Filed as Part of this Report


(1) All financial statements.


statements

The following financial statements are filed as part of this report under Item 8.


All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto, or is not applicable or required.


(2) Exhibits.


Exhibits

Exhibit Number

Description

Exhibit Number

3.1

Description
2.1
3.1

3.2

10.1*

4.1

10.2*

10.1*

10.3*

10.4*

10.2*

10.5*

10.3* 

Exhibit NumberDescription
10.6*
10.7*
10.8*
10.4*Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 2011 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed June 25, 2019).
10.5*Form of 2011 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan Outside Director Option Agreement.
10.6*Form of 2011 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.
10.7*Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 2013 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Annex A of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2020).
10.8*Form of 2013 Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement.

*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(b) thereof.

Exhibit NumberDescription
   
10.9* 
   
10.10* 
   
10.1110.11* 
10.12*Form of 2013 Incentive Plan Notice of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award and Global Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Revenue Growth Performance Basis).
10.13Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2022, by and among Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, as borrower, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2022).

10.14*

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 2020 Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2021).

10.15*

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 2021 Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2022).

10.16*Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 2022 Cash Incentive Plan.

10.17*

Amended Employment Agreement, by and between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and James R. Anderson, effective February 21, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2020).
10.18*Form of Amended Employment Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2020).

10.19*

Employment Agreement, by and between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Stephen Douglass, effective September 4, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 29, 2018).

10.20*

Employment Agreement, by and between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Sherri Luther, effective January 2, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 2, 2019).

10.21*

Employment Agreement, by and between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Esam Elashmawi, dated September 24, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2019.).

10.22Credit Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2019, by and among Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, as borrower, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2019).

10.23Office Lease, effective as of October 21, 2014, between 555 SW Oak, LLC and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2014).
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
   
21.1 
   
23.1 
   
31.124.1 

*
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(b) thereof.

Exhibit NumberDescription

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File - formatted in Inline XBRL and included in Exhibit 101

66

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(Registrant)

By:

/s/ Max DowningSherri Luther

Max Downing

Sherri Luther

Chief Financial Officer

(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date:

March 13, 2018

February 17, 2023

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Darin G. BillerbeckJames Anderson and Max Downing,Sherri Luther, or either of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for such person in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated:


Signature

Title

SignatureTitle

Date

   

Principal Executive

Officer

/s/ James Anderson

February 17, 2023

James Anderson

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer

/s/ Sherri Luther

February 17, 2023

Sherri Luther

Chief Financial Officer

Directors

/s/ Robin Abrams

February 17, 2023

Robin Abrams

Director

  
/s/ Darin G. BillerbeckDoug Bettinger March 13, 2018February 17, 2023
Darin G. BillerbeckDoug BettingerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  
/s/ Max DowningMarch 13, 2018
Max DowningChief Financial Officer
Directors  

/s/ Robin AbramsMark Jensen

February 17, 2023

Mark Jensen

Director

 March 13, 2018
Robin AbramsDirector 
/s/ Brian Beattie March 13, 2018
Brian BeattieDirector 

/s/ John BourgoinAnjali Joshi

February 17, 2023

Anjali Joshi

Director

 March 13, 2018
John BourgoinDirector 
/s/ Robert Herb March 13, 2018
Robert HerbDirector 

/s/ Mark JensenJames Lederer


March 13, 2018February 17, 2023
Mark Jensen

James Lederer

Director

 
/s/ Jeff Richardson March 13, 2018
Jeff RichardsonDirector 

/s/ Fred WeberJeff Richardson

February 17, 2023

Jeff Richardson

Director

 March 13, 2018
Fred WeberDirector 

/s/ Raejeanne Skillern

February 17, 2023

Raejeanne Skillern

Director


91
67