0000874761us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberaes:SouthAmericaSBUMember2019-01-012019-12-31

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
_____________________________________ 
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20172020
-OR-
¨TRANSITION REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-12291
Commission file number 1-12291
aes-20201231_g1.jpg
THE AES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware54 116372554-1163725
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4300 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington,Virginia22203
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(703)522-1315
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per shareAESNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d)15(d) of the Act. Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filer¨
Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
Non-accelerated filer¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o     No  x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2017,2020, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (based on the adjusted closing sale price of $10.75$14.16 of the Registrant's Common Stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date) was approximately $7.10$9.42 billion.
The number of shares outstanding of Registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, on February 21, 201822, 2021 was 660,449,495.665,479,845.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in Parts II and III





THEThe AES CORPORATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 FORMCorporation Fiscal Year 2020 Form 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE




1 | 2020 Annual Report
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Glossary of Terms
The following is a list of frequently used terms and abbreviations that appear in the text of this report and have the definitions indicated below:
Adjusted EPSAdjusted Earnings Per Share, a non-GAAP measure
Adjusted PTCAdjusted Pre-tax Contribution, a non-GAAP measure of operating performance
AESThe Parent Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates
AOCLAES BrasilAES Tietê Energia S.A
AFUDCAllowance for Funds Used During Construction
ANEELBrazilian National Electric Energy Agency
AOCLAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
ASCAROAsset Retirement Obligations
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASEPNational Authority of Public Services in Panama
BACTBest Available Control Technology
BARTBest Available Retrofit Technology
BOTBESSBattery energy storage system
BOTBuild, Operate and Transfer
BTABest Technology Available
CAAUnited States
CAAU.S. Clean Air Act
CAMMESAWholesale Electric Market Administrator in Argentina
CCGTCCEEBrazilian Chamber of Electric Energy Commercialization
CCGTCombined Cycle Gas Turbine
CDPQCCRCoal Combustion Residuals, which includes bottom ash, fly ash and air pollution control wastes generated at coal-fired generation plant sites
CDPQLa Caisse de dépôt et placement du Quebéc
CEOCECLCurrent Expected Credit Loss
CEOChief Executive Officer
CHPCombined Heat and Power
COFINSContribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social
CFEFederal Electricity Commission in Mexico
CFOChief Financial Officer
CO2
Carbon Dioxide
COSOCODCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway CommissionCommercial Operation Date
CPCapacity Performance
CPIUnited States Consumer Price Index
CPPClean Power Plan
CRESCompetitive Retail Electric Service
CSAPR
CSAPRU.S. Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
CWACTNGCompañia Transmisora del Norte Grande
CWAU.S. Clean Water Act
DG CompDirectorate-General for Competition of the European Commission
Dodd-Frank ActDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
DMRDistribution Modernization Rider
DP&L
The Dayton Power & Light CompanyCompany. DP&L is wholly-owned by DPL and also does business as AES Ohio
DPLDPL Inc.
DPLERDPL Energy Resources, Inc.
DPP
DPPDominican Power Partners
EBITDAEarnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization
EPAUnited States
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPCEngineering, Procurement, and Construction
ERCEnergy Regulatory Commission
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas
ESPElectric Security Plan
EU ETSEuropean Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme
EURIBOR
EURIBOREuro Inter Bank Offered Rate
EUSGUElectric Utility Steam Generating Unit
EVNElectricity of Vietnam
EVPExecutive Vice President
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERC
FERCU.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FONINVEMEM
FONINVEMEMFund for the Investment Needed to Increase the Supply of Electricity in the Wholesale Market in Argentina
FPAU.S. Federal Power Act
FXForeign Exchange
GAAP
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
GHGGreenhouse Gas
GRIDCOGHGGrid Corporation of Odisha Ltd.Greenhouse Gas
GWhGILTIGigawatt HoursGlobal Intangible Low Taxed Income
HLBVGSFGeneration Scaling Factor
GWGigawatts
GWhGigawatt Hours
HLBVHypothetical Liquidation Book Value
IBEXIndependent Bulgarian Power Exchange
IDEMIndiana Department of Environmental Management
IPALCOIPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
IPLIndiana, Indianapolis Power & Light Company
IPPIndependent Power Producers
ISOIndependent System Operator
IURCIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission


LIBORIDEMIndiana Department of Environmental Management
IPALCOIPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
IPL
Indianapolis Power & Light Company, which also does business as AES Indiana
IPPIndependent Power Producers


2 | 2020 Annual Report

ISOIndependent System Operator
ITCInvestment Tax Credit
IURCIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission
LIBORLondon Inter Bank Offered Rate
LNGLiquefied Natural Gas
MATSMercury and Air Toxics Standards
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MREMMBtuMillion British Thermal Units
MREEnergy Reallocation Mechanism
MWMegawatts
MWhMWMegawatt HoursMegawatts
NCIMWhNoncontrolling InterestMegawatt Hours
NCRENAAQSNon-Conventional Renewable EnergyU.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NEKNCINoncontrolling Interest
NEKNatsionalna Elektricheska Kompania (state-owned electricity public supplier in Bulgaria)
NEPCONational Electric Power Company
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NMNot Meaningful
NOVNMNot Meaningful
NOVNotice of Violation
NOX
Nitrogen Dioxide
NPDESNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NSPSNew Source Performance Standards
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
O&MOperations and Maintenance
ONS
ONSNational System Operator in Brazil
OPGCOdisha Power Generation Corporation, Ltd.
OTC PolicyStatewide Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling
OVECOhio Valley Electric Corporation, an electric generating company in which DP&L has a 4.9% interest
Parent CompanyThe AES Corporation
Pet CokePetroleum Coke
PISPCUPartially Integrated SystemPerformance Cash Units
PJMPet CokePetroleum Coke
PJMPJM Interconnection, LLC
PMParticulate Matter
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
PREPAPuerto Rico Electric Power Authority
PSD
PSDPrevention of Significant Deterioration
PSUPerformance Stock Unit
PUCOThe Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
PURPAU.S. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
QFQualifying Facility
RGGIRegional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
RMRRRoutine Maintenance, Repair and Replacement
RSU
QIAQatar Investment Authority
RSURestricted Stock Unit
RTORegional Transmission Organization
SADIArgentine Interconnected System
SBU
SBUStrategic Business Unit
SCESouthern California Edison
SECUnited StatesU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEMSingle Electricity Market
SICSEETCentral Interconnected Electricity SystemSignificantly Excessive Earnings Test
SINSENSistema Electrico Nacional in Chile
SINNational Interconnected System in Colombia
SINGNorthern Interconnected Electricity System
SIPState Implementation Plan
SNENational Secretary of Energy
SO2
Sulfur Dioxide
SSOStandard Service Offer
TECONSTerm Convertible Preferred Securities
U.S.SWRCBUnited StatesCalifornia State Water Resources Board
VAT
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TDSICTransmission, Distribution, and Storage System Improvement Charge
U.S.United States
UKUnited Kingdom
USDUnited States Dollar
VATValue Added Tax
VIEVariable Interest Entity
VinacominVietnam National Coal-Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Ltd.
YPFArgentina state-owned gas company




3 | 2020 Annual Report

PART I
In this Annual Report the terms “AES,” “the Company,” “us,” or “we” refer to The AES Corporation and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, collectively. The terms “The AES Corporation” and “Parent Company” refer only to the parent, publicly held holding company, The AES Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries and affiliates.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATIONForward-Looking Information and Risk Factor Summary
In this filing we make statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, we cannot assure you that they will prove to be correct.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and there are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Some of those factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this report and in subsequent securities filings) include:
the economic climate, particularly the state of the economy in the areas in which we operate and the state of the economy in China, which impacts demand for electricity in many of our key markets, including the fact that the global economy faces considerable uncertainty for the foreseeable future, which further increases many of the risks discussed in this Form 10-K;
changes in inflation, demand for power, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, including our ability to hedge our interest rate and foreign currency risk;
changes in the price of electricity at which our generation businesses sell into the wholesale market and our utility businesses purchase to distribute to their customers, and the success of our risk management practices, such as our ability to hedge our exposure to such market price risk;
changes in the prices and availability of coal, gas and other fuels (including our ability to have fuel transported to our facilities) and the success of our risk management practices, such as our ability to hedge our exposure to such market price risk, and our ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;
changes in and access to the financial markets, particularly changes affecting the availability and cost of capital in order to refinance existing debt and finance capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments and other corporate purposes;
our ability to fulfill our obligations, manage liquidity and comply with covenants under our recourse and non-recourse debt, including our ability to manage our significant liquidity needs and to comply with covenants under our senior securedrevolving credit facility and other existing financing obligations;
our ability to receive funds from our subsidiaries by way of dividends, fees, interest, loans or otherwise;
changes in our or any of our subsidiaries' corporate credit ratings or the ratings of our or any of our subsidiaries' debt securities or preferred stock, and changes in the rating agencies' ratings criteria;
our ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
our ability to compete in markets where we do business;
our ability to operate power generation, distribution and transmission facilities, including managing availability, outages and equipment failures;
our ability to manage our operational and maintenance costs and the performance and reliability of our generating plants, including our ability to reduce unscheduled down times;
our ability to locate and acquire attractive "greenfield" or "brownfield" projects and our ability to finance, construct and begin operating our "greenfield" or "brownfield" projects on schedule and within budget;
our ability to enter into long-term contracts, which limit volatility in our results of operations and cash flow, such as PPAs, fuel supply, and other agreements and to manage counterparty credit risks in these agreements;
variations in weather, especially mild winters and cooler summers in the areas in which we operate, the occurrence of difficult hydrological conditions for our hydropower plants, as well as hurricanes and other storms and disasters, wildfires and low levels of wind or sunlight for our wind and solar facilities;
pandemics, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious disease, including the COVID-19 pandemic;
the performance of our contracts by our contract counterparties, including suppliers or customers;


4 | 2020 Annual Report

severe weather and natural disasters;
our ability to meetraise sufficient capital to fund development projects or to successfully execute our expectations in the development construction, operation and performance of our new facilities, whether greenfield, brownfield or investments in the expansion of existing facilities;projects;
the success of our initiatives in other renewable energy projects and energy storage projects;
the availability of government incentives or policies that support the development of renewable energy generation projects;
our ability to keep up with advances in technology;
changes in number of customers or in customer usage;
the potential effects of threatened or actual acts of terrorism and war;
the expropriation or nationalizationoperations of our businesses or assets by foreign governments, with or without adequate compensation;joint ventures and equity method investments that we do not control;
our ability to achieve reasonable rate treatment in our utility businesses;


changes in laws, rules and regulations affecting our international businesses;businesses, particularly in developing countries;
changes in laws, rules and regulations affecting our North America business,utilities businesses, including, but not limited to, regulations which may affect competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs by our utilities;
changes in law resulting from new local, state, federal or international energy legislation and changes in political or regulatory oversight or incentives affecting our wind business and solar projects, our other renewables projects and our initiatives in GHG reductions and energy storage, including government policies or tax incentives;
changes in environmental laws, including requirements for reduced emissions, of sulfur, nitrogen, carbon, mercury, hazardous air pollutants and other substances, GHG legislation, regulation, and/or treaties and coal ash regulation;CCR regulation and remediation;
changes in tax laws, including U.S. tax reform, and the effects ofchallenges to our strategies to reduce tax payments;positions;
the effects of litigation and government and regulatory investigations;
the performance of our acquisitions;
our ability to maintain adequate insurance;
decreases in the value of pension plan assets, increases in pension plan expenses, and our ability to fund defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans at our subsidiaries;
losses on the sale or write-down of assets due to impairment events or changes in management intent with regard to either holding or selling certain assets;
changes in accounting standards, corporate governance and securities law requirements;
our ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;
our ability to attract and retain talented directors, management and other personnel, including, but not limited to, financial personnel in our foreign businesses that have extensive knowledge of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; andpersonnel;
cyber-attacks and information security breaches.breaches; and
data privacy.
These factors, in addition to others described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, including those described under Item 1A.—Risk Factors, and in subsequent securities filings, should not be construed as a comprehensive listing of factors that could cause results to vary from our forward-looking information.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. If one or more forward-looking statements are updated, no inference should be drawn that additional updates will be made with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.



ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1.—Business is an outline of our strategy and our businesses by SBU, including key financial drivers. Additional items that may have an impact on our businesses are discussed in Item 1A.—Risk Factors and Item 3.—Legal Proceedings.



5 | 2020 Annual Report

Executive Summary
Incorporated in 1981, AES is a global energy company accelerating the future of energy. Together with our many stakeholders, we are improving lives by delivering the greener, smarter energy solutions the world needs. Our diverse workforce is committed to continuous innovation and operational excellence, while partnering with our customers on their strategic energy transitions and continuing to meet their energy needs today.
aes-20201231_g2.jpg
Our Strategy
AES is leading the energy transition by investing in sustainable growth and innovative solutions to deliver superior results. We are taking advantage of favorable trends in clean power generation, transmission and utility company, providingdistribution, and LNG infrastructure.
Through our presence in key growth markets, we are well-positioned to benefit from the global transition toward a more sustainable power generation mix. Our robust backlog of projects under construction or under signed PPAs continues to increase, driven by our focus on select markets where we can take advantage of our global scale and synergies with our existing businesses. In 2020, we signed long-term PPAs for 3 GW, representing 10% of our existing capacity, and in line with our expectation of signing 2 to 3 GW of new PPAs annually.
We are enhancing some of our current contracts by extending existing PPAs and adding renewable energy. We call this approach Green Blend and Extend. With this strategy, we leverage our existing platforms, contracts and relationships to grow our business, while meeting our customers' energy needs on a reliable and sustainable basis. We are negotiating new long-term renewable PPAs with existing customers, which preserves the value of thermal contracts and creates incremental value with long-term contracted renewables. Customers receive carbon-free energy at less than the marginal cost of thermal power, enabling them to meet their sustainability goals and affordable sustainableenergy needs. We are executing on this strategy in Chile and Mexico and see significant potential additional opportunities in those markets, as well as in the United States.
We recently merged all of our renewables businesses in the U.S. into one team: AES Clean Energy, representing one of the top renewables growth platforms in the U.S. AES Clean Energy offers its customers an expanded portfolio of innovative solutions based on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to accelerate their energy futures.
We are facilitating access to reliable and affordable cleaner energy through our diverse portfolio of thermal and renewable generation facilities and distribution businesses. Our vision is to be the world's leading sustainable power company that safely provides reliable, affordable energy. We do this by leveraging our unique electricity platforms and the knowledge of our people to provide the energy and infrastructure solutions our customers need. Our people share a passion to help meet the world's current and increasing energy needs, while providing communities and countries the opportunity for economic growth due to the availability of reliable, affordable electric power.
In 2017, we announced the sale or retirement of 4.3 GW of mostly merchant coal-fired generation, representing 30% of our coal-fired capacity.
Future growth across our company will be heavily weighted toward less carbon-intensive wind, solar and gas generation. In 2017, AES and AIMCo completed the joint acquisition of sPower, the leading independent solar developer in the United States. sPower has 1.3 GW of solar and wind projects and an additional 10 GW of renewables in its development pipeline. sPower's robust development pipeline and expertise position AES to significantly grow our renewables portfolio in the coming years.
Growth in renewables not only provides an opportunity for direct investments in solar and wind generation, but also presents significant potential for energy storage. We are a leader in lithium-ion, battery-based energy storage, with approximately 400 MW in operation, under construction or in advanced development across seven countries. We believe that battery-based energy storage will play a critical role in an increasingly renewables-based generation mix. In January 2018, we partnered with Siemens to form Fluence, a new global energy storage technology and services company. Through a sales partnership with Siemens' global sales force, Fluence will be able to sell energy storage solutions and services in 160 countries as this market grows.
AES continues to invest in LNG opportunities to provide cleaner alternatives to countries with oil-fired power generation. Specifically, AES introduced LNG in the Dominican Republic in 2003 and currently has a 380 MW


CCGT and LNG storage and regasification facility under construction in Panama.
In the United States, primarily at IPL, we completed a multi-year rate base investment in environmental upgrades to our coal plants and are in the process of re-powering several units from coal to gas.
As a result of our efforts to decrease our exposure to coal-fired generation and increase our portfolio of renewables, energy storage and natural gas capacity, we are significantly reducing our carbon dioxide emissions per MWh of generation. Under our current strategy, we anticipate a reduction of carbon intensity levels by 25% from 2016 to 2020 and by 50% from 2016 to 2030.
In February 2018, we announced a reorganization as a part of our on-going strategy to simplify our portfolio, optimize our cost structure and reduce our carbon intensity. Reflecting this simplified portfolio, we will manage our global operations separate from our growth and commercial activities.
Strategic Priorities
We have made significant progress towards meeting our strategic goals to maximize value for our shareholders.import terminals, allowing


Leveraging Our Platforms
Focusing our growth in markets where we already operate and have a competitive advantage to realize attractive risk-adjusted returns
In 2017, brought on-line seven projects for a total of 279 MW
4,401 MW currently under construction and expected to come on-line through 2021
Will continue to advance select projects from our development pipeline
Reducing Complexity
Exiting businesses and markets where we do not have a competitive advantage, simplifying our portfolio and reducing risk
Since 2011
Announced or closed $5.4 billion in equity proceeds from sales or sell-downs
Decreased total number of countries where we have operations from 28 to 16
In 2017, announced or closed $1.1 billion in equity proceeds from sales or sell-downs of three businesses
Performance Excellence
Striving to be the low-cost manager of a portfolio of assets and deriving synergies and scale from our businesses
Since 2012, achieved $300 million in cost savings and revenue enhancements, including $50 million in 2017
Includes overhead reductions, procurement efficiencies and operational improvements
Expect to achieve an additional $50 million in 2018 and another $50 million from 2019 to6 | 2020 for a total of $400 million in annual savings in 2020
Expanding Access to Capital
Optimizing risk-adjusted returns in existing businesses and growth projects
Adjust our global exposure to commodity, fuel, country and other macroeconomic risks
Building strategic partnerships at the project and business level with an aim to optimize our risk-adjusted returns in our business and growth projects
Allocating Capital in a Disciplined Manner
Maximizing risk-adjusted returns to our shareholders by investing our free cash flow to strengthen our credit and deliver attractive growth in cash flow and earnings
In 2017, we generated substantial cash by executing on our strategy, which we allocated in line with our capital allocation framework
Used $341 million to prepay and refinance Parent Company debt
Returned $317 million to shareholders through quarterly dividends
Increased our quarterly dividend by 8.3% to $0.13 per share beginning in the first quarter of 2018
Invested $481 million in our subsidiaries
Annual Report



_____________________________
(1)
Investmentsthe displacement of the use of heavy fuel oil and diesel. We have two LNG regasification terminals in subsidiaries excludes $2.2 billion investment in DPL
(2)
Excludes working capital adjustments and growth activity prior to the close of the acquisition.
Segments
We are organized into five market-oriented SBUs: US (United States), Andes (Chile, Colombia, and Argentina), Brazil, MCAC (Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean), and Eurasia (Europe and Asia)— which are led byCaribbean, with a total of 150 TBTU of LNG storage capacity. These terminals were built to supply not only the gas for our SBU Presidents. The Eurasia SBU resulted fromco-located combined cycle plants, but also to meet the merger ofgrowing demand for natural gas in the Europe and Asia SBUs in Q3 2017, inregion. In order to leverage scale. Withinmeet this demand, we are expanding our five SBUs,capacity in the Dominican Republic by adding a second storage tank with 50 TBTU of additional capacity and we recently completed construction of a pipeline that will transport natural gas from our LNG terminal to several power plants in the country.
We are replicating our success with LNG infrastructure in the Dominican Republic and Panama by developing a similar project, on a larger scale, in Vietnam. This project will have 480 TBTU of LNG storage capacity co-located with 2.2 GW of combined cycle plants. The project will have substantial excess LNG capacity to help meet demand for natural gas in Vietnam and the power plants will have 20-year contracts with the Government of Vietnam.
At our utilities, we are accelerating growth through grid modernization and infrastructure investments to replace outdated networks. In 2020, Indianapolis Power & Light's seven-year $1.2 billion TDSIC plan was approved by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. We see similar growth opportunities at Dayton Power & Light in Ohio, including DP&L's pending Smart Grid Plan.
We are developing and deploying innovative solutions such as battery-based energy storage, digital customer interfaces and energy management. These solutions are scalable and capital light, allowing us to work with our customers to deliver results that meet their requirements.
As a result of executing on our strategy, we have two linesreduced our coal-fired generation to 25% of business. The first business line isour total generation wherevolume as of year-end 2020 (based on the portfolio as of year-end, adjusted for any announced asset sales and retirements at that time). We remain on track to further reduce our coal generation to below 10% by year-end 2030.
Strategic Highlights
In 2020, we own and/or operate power plants to generateachieved significant milestones on our strategic objectives, including:
Sustainable Growth
We completed construction of 2,318 MW of new projects, including:
1,299 MW Southland Repowering; and sell power to customers, such as utilities, industrial users,
1,019 MW of solar, wind and other intermediaries. The second business line is utilities, where we own and/or operate utilities to generate or purchase, distribute, transmitenergy storage globally
We signed 3,017 MW of renewables and sell electricity to end-user customersenergy storage under long-term PPAs, including:
1,180 MW of energy storage, solar and solar plus storage and hydro in the residential, commercial, industrialUS and governmental sectors within a defined service area. In certain circumstances,El Salvador;
1,171 MW of wind and solar at AES Gener in Chile and Colombia;
346 MW of wind at AES Brasil;
211 MW of wind and solar in Panama and the Dominican Republic; and
109 MW of wind in Mexico
As of December 31, 2020, our utilities also generatebacklog of 6,909 MW includes:
1,850 MW under construction and sell electricity on the wholesale market.coming on-line through 2022; and
5,059 MW of renewables signed under long-term PPAs
The Company measureshas reduced its coal-fired generation to 25% of total generation volume (proforma for asset sales and retirements announced in 2020) and is on track to further reduce its coal-fired generation to less than 10% by year-end 2030
Innovative Solutions
Our joint venture with Siemens, Fluence, is the operating performanceglobal leader in the fast-growing energy storage market, which is expected to increase by 15 to 20 GW annually
Fluence has been awarded or delivered 2.4 GW of its SBUs using Adjusted PTC and Consolidated Free Cash Flowprojects, including 785 MW awarded in 2020
In December 2020, the Qatar Investment Authority ("Free Cash Flow"QIA"), both non-GAAP measures. The Adjusted PTC and Free Cash Flow agreed to invest $125 million in Fluence through a private placement transaction, valuing Fluence at more than $1 billion


7 | 2020 Annual Report

Superior Results
Following our efforts to strengthen our balance sheet, our Parent Company credit rating was upgraded to investment grade (BBB-) by SBU for the year ended December 31, 2017 are shown below. The percentages for Adjusted PTC and Free Cash Flow are the contribution by each SBU to the gross metric, i.e., the total Adjusted PTC by SBU, before deductions for Corporate. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis of this Form 10-K for reconciliation and definitions of Adjusted PTC and Free Cash Flow.S&P



The following summarizes our businesses within our five SBUs.








Overview
Generation
We currently own and/or operate a generation portfolio of 34,90530,308 MW, including generation from our integrated utility.utility, IPL. Our generation fleet is diversified by fuel type. See discussion below under Fuel Costs.
Performance drivers of our generation businesses include types of electricity sales agreements, plant reliability and flexibility, availability of generation capacity to meet contracted sales, fuel costs, seasonality, weather variations and economic activity, fixed-cost management, and competition.
Contract Sales — Most of our generation businesses sell electricity under medium- or long-term contracts ("contract sales") or under short-term agreements in competitive markets ("short-term sales"). Our medium-term contract sales have terms of 2two to 5five years, while our long-term contracts have terms of more than 5five years.
In contract sales, our generation businessesContracts requiring fuel to generate energy, such as natural gas or coal, are structured to recover variable costs, including fuel and variable O&M costs, either through direct or indexation-based contractual pass-throughs or tolling arrangements. When the contract does not include a fuel pass-through, we typically hedge fuel costs or enter into fuel supply agreements for a similar contract period (see discussion below under Fuel Costs). These contracts are intended to reduce exposure to the volatility of fuel and electricity prices by linking the business's revenues and costs. These contracts also help us to fund a significant portion of the total capital cost of the project through long-term non-recourse project-level financing.
Capacity Payments in Contract Sales — Most of our contract salesCertain contracts include a capacity paymentpayments that coverscover projected fixed costs of the plant, including fixed O&M expenses, debt service, and a return on capital invested. In addition, most of our contracts require that the majority of the capacity paymentpayments be denominated in the currency matching our fixed costs.
Contracts that do not have significant fuel cost or do not contain a capacity payment are structured based on long-term spot prices with some negotiated pass-through costs, allowing us to recover expected fixed and variable costs as well as provide a return on investment.
These contracts are intended to reduce exposure to the volatility of fuel and electricity prices by linking the business's revenues and costs. We generally structure our business to eliminate or reduce foreign exchange risk by matching the currency of revenue and expenses, including fixed costs and debt. Our project debt may consist of both fixed and floating rate debt for which we typically hedge a significant portion of our exposure. Some of our contracted businesses also receive a regulated market-based capacity payment, which is discussed in more detail in the Capacity Payments andShort-Term Sales sections section below.
Thus, these contracts, or other related commercial arrangements, significantly mitigate our exposure to changes in power and, as applicable, fuel prices, currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates. In addition, these contracts generally provide for a recovery of our fixed operating expenses and a return on our investment, as long as we operate the plant to the reliability and efficiency standards required in the contract.
Short-Term Sales — Our other generation businesses sell power and ancillary services under short-term contracts with average terms of less than 2two years, including spot sales, directly in the short-term market or at regulated prices. The short-term markets are typically administered by a system operator to coordinate dispatch. Short-term markets generally operate on merit order dispatch, where the least expensive generation facilities, based upon variable cost or bid price, are dispatched first and the most expensive facilities are dispatched last. The short-term price is typically set at the marginal cost of energy or bid price (the cost of the last plant required to meet system demand). As a result, the cash flows and earnings associated with these businesses are more sensitive to fluctuations in the market price for electricity. In addition, many of these wholesale markets include markets for ancillary services to support the reliable operation of the transmission system. Across our portfolio, we provide a wide array of ancillary services, including voltage support, frequency regulation and spinning reserves.
Capacity Payments Many of the short-term markets in which we operate include regulated capacity markets. These capacity markets are intended to provide additional revenue based upon availability without reliance on the energy margin from the merit order dispatch. Capacity markets are typically priced based on the cost of a new entrant and the system capacity relative to the desired level of reserve margin (generation available in excess of peak demand).


8 | 2020 Annual Report

Our generating facilities selling in the short-term markets typically receive capacity payments based on their availability in the market. Our most significant capacity revenues are earned by our generation capacity in Ohio and Northern Ireland.
Plant Reliability and Flexibility — Our contract and short-term sales provide incentives to our generation plants to optimally manage availability, operating efficiency and flexibility. Capacity payments under contract sales are frequently tied to meeting minimum standards. In short-term sales, our plants must be reliable and flexible to capture peak market prices and to maximize market-based revenues. In addition, our flexibility allows us to capture ancillary service revenue while meeting local market needs.
Fuel Costs — For our thermal generation plants, fuel is a significant component of our total cost of generation. For contract sales, we often enter into fuel supply agreements to match the contract period, or we may financially hedge our


fuel costs. Some of our contracts have periodic adjustmentsinclude indexation for changes in fuel cost indices.fuels. In those cases, we haveseek to match our fuel supply agreements with shorter terms to match those adjustments.the indexation. For certain projects, we have tolling arrangements where the power offtaker is responsible for the supply and cost of fuel to our plants.
In short-term sales, we sell power at market prices that are generally reflective of the market cost of fuel at the time, and thus procure fuel supply on a short-term basis, generally designed to match up with our market sales profile. Since fuel price is often the primary determinant for power prices, the economics of projects with short-term sales are often subject to volatility of relative fuel prices. For further information regarding commodity price risk please see Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in this Form 10-K.
37% of the capacity of our generation plants are fueled by renewables, including hydro, solar, wind, energy storage, biomass and landfill gas, which do not have significant fuel costs.
33% of the capacity of our generation plants are fueled by natural gas. Generally, we use gas from local suppliers in each market. A few exceptions to this are AES Gener in Chile, where we purchase imported gas from third parties, and our plants in the Dominican Republic and Panama, where we import LNG to utilize in the local market.
33%27% of the capacity of our generation fleet is coal-fired. In the U.S., most of our coal-fired plants are supplied from domestic coal. At our non-U.S. generation plants, and at our plantplants in Hawaii and Puerto Rico, we source coal internationally. Across our fleet, we utilize our global sourcing program to maximize the purchasing power of our fuel procurement.
26% of the capacity of our generation plants are fueled by renewables, including hydro, solar, wind, energy storage, biomass and landfill gas, which do not have significant fuel costs.
4%3% of the capacity of our generation fleet utilizes pet coke, diesel or oil for fuel. OilWe source oil and diesel are sourced locally at prices linked to international markets, whilemarkets. We largely source pet coke is largely sourced from Mexico and the U.S.
Seasonality, Weather Variations and Economic Activity — Our generation businesses are affected by seasonal weather patterns and, therefore, operating margin is not generated evenly throughout the year. Additionally, weather variations, including temperature, solar and wind resources, and hydrological conditions, may also have an impact on generation output at our renewable generation facilities. In competitive markets for power, local economic activity can also have an impact on power demand and short-term prices for power.
Fixed-Cost Management In our businesses with long-term contracts, the majority of the fixed O&M costs are recovered through the capacity payment. However, for all generation businesses, managing fixed costs and reducing them over time is a driver of business performance.
Competition — For our businesses with medium- or long-term contracts, there is limited competition during the term of the contract. For short-term sales, plant dispatch and the price of electricity are determined by market competition and local dispatch and reliability rules.
Utilities
AES' six utility businesses distribute power to 2.42.5 million people in two countries. AES' two utilities in the U.S. also include generation capacity totaling 5,3733,973 MW. Our utility businesses consist of IPL (an integrated utility), DPL, includingand DP&L (transmission and distribution) and AES Ohio Generation (generation),in the U.S. and four utilities in El Salvador.
IPL,our fully integrated utility, and DP&L, our transmission and distribution regulated utility, operate as the sole distributors of electricity within their respective jurisdictions. IPL owns and operates all of the facilities necessary to generate, transmit and distribute electricity. DP&L owns and operates all of the facilities necessary to transmit and distribute electricity. At our distribution business in El Salvador, (distribution).we face limited competition due to significant barriers to enter the market. According to El Salvador's regulation, large regulated customers have the option of becoming unregulated users and requesting service directly from generation or commercialization agents.


9 | 2020 Annual Report

In general, our utilities sell electricity directly to end-users, such as homes and businesses, and bill customers directly. Key performance drivers for utilities include the regulated rate of return and tariff, seasonality, weather variations, economic activity and reliability of service and competition.service. Revenue from utilities is classified as regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Regulated Rate of Return and Tariff — In exchange for the right to sell or distribute electricity in a service territory, our utility businesses are subject to government regulation. This regulation sets the framework for the prices ("tariffs") that our utilities are allowed to charge customers for electricity and establishes service standards that we are required to meet.
Our utilities are generally permitted to earn a regulated rate of return on assets, determined by the regulator based on the utility's allowed regulatory asset base, capital structure and cost of capital. The asset base on which the utility is permitted a return is determined by the regulator, within the framework of applicable local laws, and is based on the amount of assets that are considered used and useful in serving customers. Both the allowed return and the asset base are important components of the utility's earning power. The allowed rate of return and operating expenses deemed reasonable by the regulator are recovered through the regulated tariff that the utility charges to its customers.
The tariff may be reviewed and reset by the regulator from time to time depending on local regulations, or the utility may seek a change in its tariffs. The tariff is generally based upon usage level and may include a pass-through of costs that are not controlled by the utility, such as the costs of fuel (in the case of integrated utilities) and/or the costs of purchased energy, to the customer. Components of the tariff that are directly passed through to the


customer are usually adjusted through a summary regulatory process or an existing formula-based mechanism. In some regulatory regimes, customers with demand above an established level are unregulated and can choose to contract directly with the utility or with other retail energy suppliers directly and pay non-bypassable fees, which are fees to the distribution company for use of its distribution system.
The regulated tariff generally recognizes that our utility businesses should recover certain operating and fixed costs, as well as manage uncollectible amounts, quality of service and technical and non-technical losses. Utilities, therefore, need to manage costs to the levels reflected in the tariff, or risk non-recovery of costs or diminished returns.
Seasonality, Weather Variations, and Economic Activity — Our utility businesses are generally affected by seasonal weather patterns and, therefore, operating margin is not generated evenly throughout the year. Additionally, weather variations may also have an impact based on the number of customers, temperature variances from normal conditions, and customers' historic usage levels and patterns. Retail sales, after adjustments for weather variations, are also affected by changes in local economic activity, energy efficiency and distributed generation initiatives, as well as the number of retail customers.
Reliability of Service — Our utility businesses must meet certain reliability standards, such as duration and frequency of outages. Those standards may be explicit, with defined performance incentives or penalties, or implicit, where the utility must operate to meet customer and/or regulator expectations.
Competition — Our integrated utility, IPL, and our regulated utility DP&L, operate as the sole distributors of electricity within their respective jurisdictions. IPL owns and operates all of the businesses and facilities necessary to generate, transmit and distribute electricity. DP&L owns and operates all of the businesses and facilities necessary to transmit and distribute electricity. Competition in the regulated electric business is primarily from the on-site generation for industrial customers. IPL is exposed to the volatility in wholesale prices to the extent our generating capacity exceeds the native load served under the regulated tariff and short-term contracts. See the full discussion under the US SBU.
At our distribution business in El Salvador, we face relatively limited competition due to significant barriers to entry. At many of these businesses, large customers, as defined by the relevant regulator, have the option to both leave and return to regulated service.
Development and Construction
We develop and construct new generation facilities. For our utility business, new plants may be built or existing plants retrofitted in response to customer needs or to comply with regulatory developments. The projects are developed subject to regulatory approval that permits recovery of our capital cost and a return on our investment. For our generation businesses, our priority for development is platform expansion opportunities,in key growth markets, where we can add on toleverage our global scale and synergies with our existing facilities in our key platform markets where we have a competitive advantage.businesses by adding renewable energy. We make the decision to invest in new projects by evaluating the strategic fit, project returns and financial profile against a fair risk-adjusted return for the investment and against alternative uses of capital, including corporate debt repayment and share buybacks.repayment.
In some cases, we enter into long-term contracts for output from new facilities prior to commencing construction. To limit required equity contributions from The AES Corporation, we also seek non-recourse project debt financing and other sources of capital, including partners, wherewhen it is commercially attractive. We typically contract with a third party to manage construction, although our construction management team supervises the construction work and tracks progress against the project's budget and the required safety, efficiency and productivity standards.


10 | 2020 Annual Report

Segments
The segment reporting structure uses the Company's management reporting structure as its foundation to reflect how the Company manages the business internally. It is organized by geographic regions, which provideprovides a socio-political-economic understanding of our business.
We are organized into four market-oriented SBUs: US and Utilities (United States, Puerto Rico and El Salvador); South America (Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Brazil); MCAC (Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean); and Eurasia (Europe and Asia)— which are led by our SBU Presidents. We have two lines of business: generation and utilities. Each of our SBUs participates in our first business line, generation, in which we own and/or operate power plants to generate and sell power to customers, such as utilities, industrial users, and other intermediaries. Our US and Utilities SBU participates in our second business line, utilities, in which we own and/or operate utilities to generate or purchase, distribute, transmit and sell electricity to end-user customers in the residential, commercial, industrial and governmental sectors within a defined service area. In certain circumstances, our utilities also generate and sell electricity on the wholesale market.
We measure the operating performance of our SBUs using Adjusted PTC, a non-GAAP measure. The Adjusted PTC by SBU for the year ended December 31, 2020 is shown below. The percentages for Adjusted PTC are the contribution by each SBU to the gross metric, i.e., the total Adjusted PTC by SBU, before deductions for Corporate. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis of this Form 10-K for reconciliation and definitions of Adjusted PTC.
aes-20201231_g3.jpgaes-20201231_g4.jpg
For financial reporting purposes, the Company's corporate activities and certain other investments are reported within "Corporate and Other" because they do not require separate disclosure. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 15—18—Segment and GeographicInformation included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further discussion of the Company's segment structure.




11 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g5.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.


12 | 2020 Annual Report

US and Utilities SBU
Our US and Utilities SBU has 1837 generation facilities, and two utilities in the United States.States, and four utilities in El Salvador.
Generation — Operating installed capacity of our US and Utilities SBU totals 12,37111,754 MW. IPL's parent, IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.(IPL's parent), DP&L, and DPL Inc. (DP&L's parent) are all SEC registrants, and as such, follow the public filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following table lists our US and Utilities SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
Bosforo (1)
Bosforo (1)
El SalvadorSolar100 50 %2018-20192043-2044CAESS, EEO, CLESA, DEUSEM
AES NejapaAES NejapaEl SalvadorLandfill Gas100 %20112035CAESS
OpicoOpicoEl SalvadorSolar100 %20202040CLESA
MoncaguaMoncaguaEl SalvadorSolar100 %20152035EEO
El Salvador SubtotalEl Salvador Subtotal113 
Southland—Alamitos US-CA Gas 2,075
 100% 1998 2019-2020 Southern California EdisonSouthland—AlamitosUS-CAGas1,200 100 %19982023Various
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo A (1))
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo A (1))
US-VariousSolar1,101 26 %2017-20192028-2046Various
Southland—Redondo Beach US-CA Gas 1,392
 100% 1998 2018 Southern California EdisonSouthland—Redondo BeachUS-CAGas876 100 %19982021Various
sPower (1)(2)
 US-Various Solar 1,245
 50% 2017 2028-2046 Various
Southland Energy—Alamitos (2)
Southland Energy—Alamitos (2)
US-CAGas650 65 %20202040Southern California Edison
Southland Energy—Huntington Beach(2)
Southland Energy—Huntington Beach(2)
US-CAGas649 65 %20202040Southern California Edison
AES Puerto RicoAES Puerto RicoUS-PRCoal524 100 %20022027Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
AES Clean Energy (AES Distributed Energy) (3)
AES Clean Energy (AES Distributed Energy) (3)
US-VariousSolar283 100 %2015-20202029-2042Utility, Municipality, Education, Non-Profit
Energy Storage39 
Southland—Huntington Beach US-CA Gas 474
 100% 1998 2019-2020 Southern California EdisonSouthland—Huntington BeachUS-CAGas236 100 %19982023Various
Shady Point US-OK Coal 360
 100% 1991 2018 Oklahoma Gas & Electric
Buffalo Gap II (3)
 US-TX Wind 233
 100% 2007 
 
Buffalo Gap II (3)
US-TXWind228 100 %2007
Hawaii US-HI Coal 206
 100% 1992 2022 Hawaiian Electric Co.
Hawaii (4)
Hawaii (4)
US-HICoal206 100 %19922022Hawaiian Electric Co.
Warrior Run US-MD Coal 205
 100% 2000 2030 First EnergyWarrior RunUS-MDCoal205 100 %20002030Potomac Edison
Prevailing Winds (AES Clean Energy/sPower)Prevailing Winds (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-SDWind200 50 %20202050Prevailing Winds
Buffalo Gap III (3)
 US-TX Wind 170
 100% 2008 
 
Buffalo Gap III (3)
US-TXWind170 100 %2008
sPower (2)
 US-Various Wind 142
 50% 2017 2036 Various
Distributed PV - Commercial & Utility (3)
 US-Various Solar 126
 100% 2015-2017 2029-2042 Utility, Municipality, Education, Non-Profit
Highlander (AES Clean Energy/sPower)Highlander (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-VASolar165 50 %20202035Apple, Akami, Etsy, Microsoft
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo A (1))
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo A (1))
US-VariousWind140 26 %20172036Various
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo B (1))
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo B (1))
US-VariousSolar126 50 %20192039-2044Various
Buffalo Gap I (3)
 US-TX Wind 119
 100% 2006 2021 Direct Energy
Buffalo Gap I (3)
US-TXWind108 100 %20062021Direct Energy
Southland Energy—Alamitos Energy Center (2)
Southland Energy—Alamitos Energy Center (2)
US-CAEnergy Storage100 65 %20212041Southern California Edison
East Line Solar (AES Clean Energy/sPower)East Line Solar (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-AZSolar100 50 %20202045Salt River Project
Laurel Mountain US-WV Wind 98
 100% 2011 
 
Laurel MountainUS-WVWind98 100 %2011
Mountain View I & II US-CA Wind 65
 100% 2008 2021 Southern California EdisonMountain View I & IIUS-CAWind64 100 %20082021Southern California Edison
Mountain View IV US-CA Wind 49
 100% 2012 2032 Southern California EdisonMountain View IVUS-CAWind49 100 %20122032Southern California Edison
Lawa'i (AES Clean Energy/AES Distributed Energy (3))
Lawa'i (AES Clean Energy/AES Distributed Energy (3))
US-HISolar20 100 %20182043Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative
Energy Storage20 
Kekaha (AES Clean Energy/AES Distributed Energy (3))
Kekaha (AES Clean Energy/AES Distributed Energy (3))
US-HISolar14 100 %20192045Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative
Energy Storage14 
Na Pua MakaniNa Pua MakaniUS-HIWind28 100 %20202040HECO
IluminaIluminaUS-PRSolar24 100 %20122032Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Laurel Mountain ES US-WV Energy Storage 27
 100% 2011 
 
Laurel Mountain ESUS-WVEnergy Storage16 100 %2011
Southland Energy—AES Gilbert (Salt River) (2)
Southland Energy—AES Gilbert (Salt River) (2)
US-AZEnergy Storage10 65 %20192039Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Warrior Run ES US-MD Energy Storage 10
 100% 2016 
 
Warrior Run ESUS-MDEnergy Storage100 %2016
Advancion Applications Center US-PA Energy Storage 2
 100% 2013 
 
United States SubtotalUnited States Subtotal7,668 
 6,998
   7,781 
_____________________________
(1)Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.


(1)
sPower solar MW shown in Direct Current.13 | 2020 Annual Report
(2)
Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.
(3)
AES owns these assets together with third-party tax equity investors with variable ownership interests. The tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. The proceeds from the issuance of tax equity are recorded as noncontrolling interest in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2)AES is entitled to all earnings or losses until March 1, 2021, and any distributions related thereto.
(3)AES owns these assets together with third-party tax equity investors with variable ownership interests. The tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. The proceeds from the issuance of tax equity are recorded as noncontrolling interest in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(4)In November 2020, announced expected retirement in 2022.
Utilities — The following table lists our utilities and their generation facilities.
BusinessLocationApproximate Number of Customers Served as of 12/31/2020GWh Sold in 2020FuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began Operation
CAESSEl Salvador624,000 1,945 75 %2000
CLESAEl Salvador432,000 936 80 %1998
DEUSEMEl Salvador87,000 144 74 %2000
EEOEl Salvador330,000 615 89 %2000
El Salvador Subtotal1,473,000 3,640 
DPL (1)
US-OH531,000 13,468 100 %2011
IPL (2)
US-IN512,000 14,559 Coal/Gas/Oil/Energy Storage3,973 70 %2001
United States Subtotal1,043,000 28,027 3,973 
2,516,000 31,667 
_____________________________
(1)DPL's GWh sold in 2020 represent DP&L's (DPL's subsidiary) total transmission and distribution sales. DPL's wholesale revenues and DP&L's SSO utility revenues, which are sales to utility customers who use DP&L to source their electricity through a competitive bid process, were 4,481 GWh in 2020. DPL's other primary subsidiary, AES Ohio Generation, LLC, owned an interest in Conesville Unit 4. This plant was shutdown in May 2020 and sold in June 2020. DP&L also owns a 4.9% equity ownership in OVEC, an electric generating company. OVEC has two plants in Cheshire, Ohio and Madison, Indiana with a combined generation capacity of approximately 2,109 MW. DP&L’s share of this generation is approximately 103 MW.
(2)CDPQ owns direct and indirect interests in IPALCO which total approximately 30%. AES owns 85% of AES US Investments and AES US Investments owns 82.35% of IPALCO. IPL plants: Georgetown, Harding Street, Petersburg and Eagle Valley. 20 MW of IPL total is considered a transmission asset. In December 2019, IPL announced it would be retiring Petersburg Unit 1 in June 2021 and Petersburg Unit 2 in June 2023, a total of 630 MW. IPL issued an all-source Request for Proposal in December 2019 in order to competitively procure replacement capacity.
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the US and Utilities SBU:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
AES Clean Energy (AES Distributed Energy)US-VariousSolar77 100 %1H 2021
Energy Storage42 
Central Line (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-AZSolar100 50 %2H 2021
Clover Creek (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-UTSolar80 50 %2H 2021
Cuscatlan SolarEl SalvadorSolar10 100 %1H 2021
309 
The majority of projects under construction have executed long-term PPAs or, as applicable, have been assigned tariffs through a regulatory process.

Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
Eagle Valley CCGT US-IN Gas 671
 70% 1H 2018
Distributed PV - Commercial US-Various Solar 27
 100% 1H-2H 2018
Lawai US-HI Solar/Energy Storage 48
 100% 1H 2019
Southland Re-powering US-CA Gas 1,284
 100% 1H 2020
Alamitos Energy Center US-CA Energy Storage 100
 100% 1H 2021
      2,130
    
Utilities — The following table lists our U.S. utilities and their generation facilities:

Business Location Approximate Number of Customers Served as of 12/31/2017 GWh Sold in 2017 Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation
DPL (1)
 US-OH 521,000
 14,771
 Coal/Gas/Diesel/Solar 2,125
 100% 2011
IPL (2)
 US-IN 490,000
 13,484
 Coal/Gas/Oil 3,248
 70% 2001
    1,011,000
 28,255
   5,373
    
_____________________________
(1)
As of December 31, 2017, DPL's subsidiary AES Ohio Generation, LLC owned the following plants (the Peaker Assets): Tait Units 1-7 and diesels, Yankee Street, Yankee Solar, Monument, Montpelier, Hutchings and Sidney. AES Ohio Generation jointly-owned the following plants: Conesville Unit 4, Killen and Stuart. DPL subsidiary DP&L also owned a 4.9% equity ownership in OVEC, an electric generating company. OVEC has two plants in Cheshire, Ohio and Madison, Indiana with a combined generation capacity of approximately 2,109 MW. DP&L’s share of this generation is approximately 103 MW. AES’ share of the AES Ohio Generation jointly-owned plants, Conesville Unit 4, Stuart and Killen, represents 1,152 MW.14 | 2020 Annual Report
(2)
CDPQ owns direct and indirect interests in IPALCO which total approximately 30%. AES owns 85% of AES US Investments and AES US Investments owns 82.35% of IPALCO. IPL plants: Georgetown, Harding Street, Petersburg and Eagle Valley (new CCGT currently under construction). 3.2 MW of IPL total is considered a transmission asset.



The following map illustrates the locationlocations of our U.S.US and Utilities facilities:
U.S.US and Utilities Businesses
U.S. Utilitiesaes-20201231_g6.jpg
IPL
Business Description — IPALCO is a holding company whose principal subsidiary is IPL. IPL, which also does business as AES Indiana, is an integrated utility that is engaged primarily in generating, transmitting, distributing, and selling electric energy to retail customers in the city of Indianapolis and neighboring areas within the state of Indiana and is subject to regulatory authority—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. IPL has an exclusive right to provide electric service to the customers in its service area, covering about 528 square miles with an estimated population of approximately 965,000 people. IPL owns and operates four generating stations, all within the state of Indiana. IPL’s largest generating station, Petersburg, is coal-fired, and IPL has plans to retire approximately 630 MW of coal-fired generation at Petersburg Units 1 and 2 in 2021 and 2023, respectively (see Integrated Resource Plan below). The second largest station, Harding Street, uses natural gas and fuel oil to power combustion turbines. In addition, IPL operates a 20 MW battery-based energy storage unit at Harding Street, which provides frequency response. The third station, Eagle Valley, is a CCGT natural gas plant. IPL took operational control and commenced commercial operations of this CCGT in April 2018. The fourth station, Georgetown, is a small peaking station that uses natural gas to power combustion turbines. In addition, IPL helps meet its customers' energy needs with long-term contracts for the purchase of 96 MW of solar-generated electricity and 300 MW of wind-generated electricity.
Key Financial Drivers IPL's financial results are driven primarily by retail demand, weather, and maintenance costs. IPL's financial results are likely to be driven by many other factors as well, including, but not limited to:
regulatory outcomes and impacts;


15 | 2020 Annual Report

the passage of new legislation, implementation of regulations, or other changes in regulation; and
timely recovery of capital expenditures.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — IPL is subject to comprehensive regulation by the IURC with respect to its services and facilities, retail rates and charges, the issuance of long-term securities, and certain other matters. The regulatory powerauthority of the IURC over IPL's business is typical of regulation generally imposed by state public utility commissions. The IURC sets tariff rates for electric service provided by IPL. The IURC considers all allowable costs for ratemaking purposes, including a fair return on assets used and useful to providing service to customers.
IPL's tariff rates for electric service to retail customers consist of basic rates and approved charges. In addition, IPL's rates include various adjustment mechanisms, including, but not limited to: (i) a rider to reflect changes in fuel and purchased power costs to meet IPL's retail load requirements, referred to as the Fuel Adjustment Charge, (ii) a rider to reflect changes in ongoing RTO costs, and (ii)(iii) a rider for the timely recovery of demand side management energy efficiency program costs, incurredand (iv) riders to comply with environmental lawscollect changes in capacity sales and regulations.wholesale sales margins above and below established annual benchmarks, referred to as the Capacity Adjustment and Off-System Sales Margin Adjustment, respectively. These components function somewhat independently of one another, and arebut the overall structure of IPL's rates is subject to review at the same time asof any review of IPL's basic rates and charges. Additionally, IPL's rider recoveries are reviewed through recurring filings.
On October 31, 2018, the IURC issued an order approving an uncontested settlement agreement to increase IPL's annual revenues by $44 million, or 3% (the "2018 Base Rate Order"). This revenue increase primarily includes recovery through rates of costs associated with the CCGT at Eagle Valley, completed in the first half of 2018, and other construction projects. New base rates and charges became effective on December 5, 2018. The 2018 Base Rate Order also provides customers with approximately $50 million in benefits over a two-year period through a rate adjustment mechanism that began in March 2019.
IPL is one of many transmission system owner members in MISO, an RTO which maintains functional control over the combined transmission systems of its members and manages one of the largest energy and ancillary services markets in the U.S. MISO operates on a meritdispatches generation assets in economic order dispatch, considering transmission constraints and other reliability issues to meet the total demand in the MISO region. IPL offers electricity in the MISO day-ahead and real-time markets.
Business Description — IPL is engaged primarily in generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electric energy to retail customers in the city of Indianapolis and neighboring areas within the state of Indiana. IPL has an exclusive right to provide electric service to those customers. IPL's service area covers about 528 square miles with an estimated population of approximately 941,000. IPL owns and operates four generating stations all within the state of Indiana. IPL’s largest generating station, Petersburg, is coal-fired. The second largest, Harding Street, is natural gas-fired and uses natural gas and fuel oil to power combustion turbines. In addition, IPL operates a 20 MW battery-based energy storage unit at this location. The third, Eagle Valley, retired its coal-fired units in April 2016


and the new CCGT is expected to be completed in the first half of 2018 with installed capacity of 671 MW. The fourth, Georgetown, is a small peaking station that uses natural gas to power combustion turbines.
In December 2017, IPL filed an updated petition with the IURC requesting an increase to its basic rates and charges primarily to recover the cost of the new CCGT at Eagle Valley. The requested increase is proposed to coincide with the completion of the CCGT, which is expected in the first half of 2018. IPL’s proposed increase was $125 million annually, or 9%. In February 2018, IPL filed an update to the petition to reflect the newly enacted U.S. tax law, which reduced the revenue increase IPL is seeking to $97 million, or 7%. An order on this proceeding will likely be issued by the IURC by the first quarter of 2019.
Environmental Regulation — For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
Key Financial Drivers IPL's financial results are driven primarily by retail demand, weather, generating unit availability, outage costs and, to a lesser extent, wholesale prices. In addition, IPL's financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Rate case outcomes
Timely completion of major construction projects and recovery of capital expenditures through base rate growth
Passage of new legislation or implementation of or changes in regulations
Construction and Development Strategy IPL's construction program is composed of capital expenditures necessary for prudent utility operations and compliance with environmental laws and regulations, along with discretionary investments designed to replace aging equipment or improve overall performance.
Senate Enrolled Act 560, the Transmission, Distribution, and Storage System Improvement Charge ("TDSIC") statute, provides for cost recovery outside of a base rate proceeding for new or replacement electric and gas transmission, distribution, and storage projects that a public utility undertakes for the purposes of safety, reliability, system modernization, or economic development. Provisions of the TDSIC statute require that requests for recovery include a seven-year plan of eligible investments. Once a plan is approved by the IURC, eighty percent of eligible costs can be recovered using a periodic rate adjustment mechanism, referred to as a TDSIC mechanism. Recoverable costs include a return on, and of, the investment, including AFUDC, post-in-service carrying charges, operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and property taxes. The remaining twenty percent of recoverable costs are deferred for future recovery in the public utility’s next general rate case. The TDSIC mechanism is capped at an annual increase of two percent of total retail revenues.
On March 4, 2020, the IURC issued an order approving the projects in IPL's seven-year TDSIC Plan for eligible transmission, distribution, and storage system improvements totaling $1.2 billion from 2020 through 2027. On June 18, 2020, IPL filed its first annual TDSIC rate adjustment for a return on, and of, investments through March 31, 2020. On October 14, 2020, the IURC issued an order approving this TDSIC rate adjustment, which was reflected in rates effective November 2020.
Integrated Resource Plan In December 2019, IPL filed its Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP"), which describes IPL's Preferred Resource Portfolio for meeting its generation capacity needs for serving its retail customers over the next several years. IPL's Preferred Resource Portfolio is IPL's reasonable least cost option and provides a cleaner and more diverse generation mix for customers. The IRP includes the retirement of 630 MW of coal-fired generation by 2023. Based on extensive modeling, IPL has determined that the cost of operating Petersburg Units 1 and 2 exceeds the value customers receive compared to alternative resources. Retirement of these units allows the company to cost-effectively diversify the portfolio and transition to lower cost and cleaner resources while maintaining a reliable system.


16 | 2020 Annual Report

IPL issued an all-source Request for Proposal on December 20, 2019, in order to competitively procure replacement capacity by June 1, 2023, which is the first year IPL is expected to have a capacity shortfall. Modeling indicated that a combination of wind, solar, storage, and energy efficiency would be the lowest reasonable cost option for the replacement capacity. Proposals were received through February 28, 2020 and are currently being evaluated. On February 5, 2021, IPL announced an agreement to acquire a 195 MW solar project, subject to approval from the IURC.
DPL
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure Business Description — DPL is an energy holding company whose principal subsidiaries includesubsidiary is DP&L. DP&L, andwhich also does business as AES Ohio, Generation, LLC, bothis a utility company that transmits and distributes electricity to retail customers in a 6,000 square mile area of which operate in Ohio. Electric customers withinWest Central Ohio are permittedand is subject to purchase power under contract from a CRES Provider or from their local utility under SSO rates. The SSO generation supply is provided by third parties through a competitive bid process. Ohio utilities haveregulatory authority—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. DP&L has the exclusive right to provide transmission and distribution services to its customers, and procures retail standard service offer ("SSO") electric service on behalf of residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental customers through a competitive bid auction process. In previous years, AES Ohio Generation was also a primary subsidiary, but DPL has systematically exited this generation business. AES Ohio Generation completed the sale of its peaker assets in their state certified territories.March 2018. In May 2018, AES Ohio Generation retired its Stuart and Killen facilities and completed the transfer of these facilities to a third party in December 2019. AES Ohio Generation's only remaining operating asset, Conesville Unit 4, was shut down in May 2020 and sold in June 2020.
Key Financial Drivers — Following the removal of the Decoupling Rider in December 2019, DPL's financial results are driven primarily by retail demand and weather. DPL's financial results are likely to be driven by other factors as well, including, but not limited to:
regulatory outcomes and impacts;
the passage of new legislation, implementation of regulations, or other changes in regulations; and
timely recovery of transmission and distribution expenditures.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure DP&L is regulated by the PUCO for its distribution services and facilities, retail rates and charges, reliability of service, compliance with renewable energy portfolio requirements, energy efficiency program requirements, and certain other matters. The PUCO maintains jurisdiction over the delivery of electricity, SSO, and other retail electric services.
Electric customers within Ohio are permitted to purchase power under contract from a Competitive Retail Electric Service ("CRES") provider or from their local utility under SSO rates. The SSO generation supply is provided by third parties through a competitive bid process. Ohio utilities have the exclusive right to provide transmission and distribution services in their state-certified territories. While Ohio allows customers to choose retail generation providers, DP&L is required to provide retail generation service at SSO rates to any customer that has not signed a contract with a CRES provider.provider or as a provider of last resort in the event of a CRES provider default. SSO rates are subject to rules and regulations of the PUCO and are established through a competitive bid process for the supply of power to SSO customers.
DP&L's distribution rates are regulated by the PUCO and are established through a traditional cost-based rate-setting process. DP&L is permitted to recover its costs of providing distribution service as well as earn a regulated rate of return on assets, determined by the regulator, based on the utility's allowed regulated asset base, capital structure, and cost of capital. DP&L's retail rates include various adjustment mechanisms including, but not limited to, the timely recovery of costs incurred related to comply with alternativepower purchased through the competitive bid process, participation in the PJM RTO, severe storm damage, and energy renewables, energy efficiency, and economic development costs.efficiency. DP&L's wholesale transmission rates are regulated by the FERC.
DP&L is a member of PJM, an RTO that operates the transmission systems owned by utilities operating in all or parts of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, D.C., Virginia, Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, Indiana and Illinois.a multi-state region, including Ohio. PJM also runsadministers the day-ahead and real-time energy markets, ancillary services market and forward capacity market for its members.
AsIn September 2018, DP&L received an order from the PUCO establishing new base distribution rates, which became effective October 1, 2018. The order approved, without modification, a memberstipulation and recommendation previously filed by DP&L, along with various intervening parties, with the PUCO staff. The order established a revenue requirement of PJM, AES Ohio Generation is subject$248 million for DP&L's electric service base distribution rates, which reflected an increase to chargesdistribution revenues of $30 million per year. In addition, the order authorized DP&L to collect from customers costs related to qualified investments through a Distribution Investment Rider ("DIR"), changed the Decoupling Rider to reduce variability from the impact of weather and demand, partially resolved regulatory issues related to the TCJA, and authorized DP&L to defer certain vegetation management costs associated with PJM operations asfor future collection.


17 | 2020 Annual Report

On November 30, 2020, DP&L filed a new Distribution Rate Case Application proposing a revenue increase of $121 million per year and incorporates DIR investments that were planned and approved in the last rate case but not yet included in distribution rates, other distribution investments since September 2015, investments necessitated by the FERC.tornados that occurred on Memorial Day in 2019, and other proposed increases. The capacity constructoutcome of PJM operates underthis filing is unknown at this time.
In March 2020, DP&L filed an application for a formula-based rate for its transmission service, which was approved and made effective May 3, 2020. In December 2020, a unanimous settlement was reached regarding these rates and filed with the Capacity Performance ("CP") program,FERC, which offers capacity revenues combined with penalties for non-performance or under-performance during certain periods identifiedwould be an approximately $7 million annualized increase from the rates in effect prior to May 3, 2020. The uncontested settlement is expected to receive FERC approval in early 2021.
ESP Proceedings — Ohio law requires utilities to provide their customers a default generation service, known as "capacity performance hours." This linkage between non- or under-performance during specific hours means that a generation unit that is generally performing well on an annual basis, may incur substantial penalties if it happens toSSO, which can be unavailable for service during some capacity performance hours. Similarly, a generation unit that is generally performing poorly on an annual basis may avoid such penalties if its outages happen to occur only during hours that are not capacity performance hours. An annual “stop-loss” provision exists that limits the size of penalties to 150% of the net cost of new entry, which is a value computed by PJM. This level is


likely to be larger than the capacity price established under the CP program, so that there is potential that participation in the CP program could result in capacity penalties that exceed capacity revenues.form of an electric security plan ("ESP") or a market rate offer ("MRO"), submitted for approval to the PUCO. The purpose of the CP program is to enable PJM to obtain sufficient resources to reliably meet the needs of electric customers within the PJM footprint. PJM conductsPUCO previously approved DP&L’s ESP for a six-year period beginning on November 1, 2017 (“ESP 3”). ESP 3 established a Distribution Modernization Rider (“DMR”) with an auction to establish the price by zone.
Business Description — DP&L transmits, distributes and sells electricity to retail customers in a 6,000 square mile area of West Central Ohio. Ohio consumers have the right to choose the electric generation supplier from whom they purchase retail generation service; however, retail transmission and distribution services are still regulated. DP&L has the exclusive right to provide such transmission and distribution services to those customers. Additionally, DP&L procures retail SSO electric service on behalf of residential, commercial, industrial and governmental customers.
In October 2017, the PUCO approved DP&L's most recent ESP. The agreement establishes a six year settlement, an updated framework to provide retail services including rate structures, non-bypassable charges, and other specific rate recovery true-up mechanisms. The settlement also establishes ainitial three-year non-bypassable distribution modernization rider designedterm to collect $105 million in revenue per year which could be extended by PUCO for an additional two years.through October 2020 primarily to pay debt obligations at DPL and DP&L and position DP&L to modernize and/or maintain its transmission and distribution infrastructure.
In October 2017,November 2019, the PUCO issued an order modifying the ESP 3 by removing the DMR. As a result, DP&L transferred its interestrequested and the PUCO approved the request to revert to the ESP 1 rates, including authorizing the collection of a Rate Stability Charge ("RSC") of approximately $79 million per year, effective December 18, 2019. The order also disallowed the Regulatory Compliance Rider, Uncollectible Rider, DIR, and the Decoupling Rider. The PUCO order also required DP&L to conduct both an ESP v. MRO Test to validate that the ESP is more favorable in its coal-firedthe aggregate than what would be experienced under an MRO, and a prospective SEET, both of which were filed with the PUCO on April 1, 2020. DP&L is also subject to an annual retrospective SEET. On October 23, 2020, DP&L entered into a Stipulation and Recommendation with the staff of the PUCO and certain other generating unitsparties with respect to, AES Ohio Generation. AES Ohio Generation, solelyamong other matters, DP&L’s applications pending at the PUCO for (i) approval of DP&L’s plan to modernize its distribution grid (the “Smart Grid Plan”), (ii) findings that DP&L passed the SEET for 2018 and 2019, and (iii) findings that DP&L’s current electric security plan, ESP 1, satisfies the SEET and the more favorable in the aggregate (“MFA”) regulatory test. The settlement is subject to, and conditioned upon, approval by the PUCO. A hearing was conducted January 11 - 15, 2021 for consideration of this settlement. The settlement would provide, among other items, for the following:
Approval of the Smart Grid Plan outlined in the Smart Grid Plan application filed by DP&L with the PUCO, as modified by the terms of the settlement, including, subject to offsetting operational benefits and certain other conditions, a return on and recovery of up to $249 million of Smart Grid Plan Phase 1 capital investments and recovery of operational and maintenance expenses through DP&L’s existing Infrastructure Investment Rider for a term of four years, under an aggregate cap of approximately $268 million on the amount of such investments and expenses that is recoverable, and an acknowledgement that DP&L may file a subsequent application with the PUCO within three years seeking approvals for Phase 2 of the Smart Grid Plan;
A commitment by DP&L to invest in a Customer Information System and supporting technologies during Phase 1 of the Smart Grid Plan, with return on and of prudently incurred capital investments and operational and maintenance expenses, including deferred operational and maintenance expense amounts, in a future rate case;
A determination that ESP 1 satisfies the prospective SEET and the MFA regulatory test;
A recommendation by parties to the settlement that the PUCO also finds that DP&L satisfies the retrospective SEET for 2018 and 2019;
A commitment to file an application with the PUCO no later than October 1, 2023 for a new ESP that does not seek to implement certain non-bypassable charges, including those related to provider of last resort risks, stability, or through jointly-owned facilities, owns coal-firedfinancial integrity;
DP&L shareholder funding, in an aggregate amount of approximately $30 million over four years, for certain economic development discounts, incentives, and peaking generation units representing 2,125 MW locatedgrants to certain commercial and industrial customers, including hospitals and manufacturers, assistance for low-income customers as well as the residents and businesses of the City of Dayton, and promotion of solar and resiliency development within DP&L’s service territory.
Certain parties which intervened in Ohiothe ESP proceedings have filed petitions for rehearing of the recent PUCO ESP order, some of which seek to eliminate DP&L's RSC from its rates and Indiana. AES Ohio Generation sells allothers to re-implement ESP 3 without


18 | 2020 Annual Report

the DMR. The ultimate outcome of these petitions is unknown and could have a material adverse effect on DP&L’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The parties signing the above-referenced settlement have agreed to withdraw their respective petitions if the settlement is approved by the PUCO without material modification.
Separate from the ESP process, on January 23, 2020, DP&L filed with the PUCO requesting approval to defer its energydecoupling costs consistent with the methodology approved in its Distribution Rate Case. If approved, deferral would be effective December 18, 2019 and capacity into the wholesale market.
In January 2017, Stuart Unit 1 failed and was retired. In March 2017 it was decided to retire the Stuart coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units and Killen coal-fired generating unit and combustion turbine on or before June 1, 2018. In December 2017, AES Ohio Generation sold its undivided interests in Zimmer and Miami Fort, and entered into an agreement to sell its 973 MWgoing forward would reduce impacts of peaking capacity.
Environmental Regulation — For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
Key Financial Drivers — DPL's financial results are primarily driven by retail demand, weather, energy efficiency generating unit availability, outage costs,programs, and wholesale prices. In addition, DPL financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:economic changes in customer demand.
PJM capacity prices
Outcome of DP&L's pending distribution rate case
Recovery in the power market, particularly as it relates to an expansion in dark spreads
DPL's ability to reduce its cost structure
Construction and Development Strategy — Planned construction additionsprojects primarily relate to new investments in and upgrades to DPL's power plant equipment andDP&L's transmission and distribution system. Capital projects are subject to continuing review and are revised in light of changes in financial and economic conditions, load forecasts, legislative and regulatory developments, and changing environmental standards, among other factors.
DPL is projecting to spend an estimated $359$767 million on capital projects from 2021 through 2023, which includes expected spending under DP&L's Smart Grid Plan included in the Stipulation and Recommendation entered into on October 23, 2020 (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure above) as well as new transmission projects. The Smart Grid Plan was initially filed with the PUCO in December 2018 proposing to invest $576 million in capital projects forover 10 years and includes leveraging technologies to modernize and improve the period 2018 through 2020 with 94% attributablesustainability of the grid, and enhancing customer experience and security, as well as to Transmissionallow DP&L to leverage and Distribution. DPL's ability to complete capital projectsintegrate distributed energy resources into its grid, including community solar, energy storage, microgrids, and the reliability of future service will be affected by its financial condition, the availability of internal funds and the reasonable cost of external funds. We expectelectric vehicle charging infrastructure. DPL expects to finance thesethis construction additions with a combination of cash on hand, short-term financing, long-term debt, equity capital contributions, and cash flows from operations.
Non-renewable U.S. Generation
Business Description — In the U.S., we own a diversified generation portfolio in terms of geography, technology and fuel source.portfolio. The principal markets and locations where we are engaged in the generation and supply of electricity (energy and capacity) are the Western Electric Coordinating Council,California Independent System Operator ("CAISO"), PJM, Southwest Power Pool Electric Energy NetworkHawaii, and Hawaii.Puerto Rico. AES Southland, operating in the Western Electric Coordinating Council,CAISO, is our most significant generatinggeneration business.
Many of our non-renewable U.S. generation plants provide baseload operations and are required to maintain a guaranteed level of availability. Any change in availability has a direct impact on financial performance. TheSome plants are generally eligible for availability bonuses on an annual basis if they meet certain requirements. In additionCoal and natural gas are used as the primary fuels. Coal prices are set by market factors internationally, while natural gas prices are generally set domestically. Price variations for these fuels can change the composition of generation costs and energy prices in our generation businesses.
Many of these generation businesses have entered into long-term PPAs with utilities or other offtakers. Some businesses with PPAs have mechanisms to recover fuel costs from the offtaker, including an energy payment partially based on the market price of fuel. When market price fluctuations in fuel are borne by the offtaker, revenue may change as fuel prices fluctuate, but the variable margin or profitability should remain consistent. These businesses often have an opportunity to increase or decrease profitability from payments under their PPAs depending on such items as plant efficiency and availability, heat rate, ability to buy coal at lower costs through AES' global sourcing program, and fuel costflexibility.
Warrior Run is a key business driver for someone of our facilities.non-renewable generation businesses in the U.S. that currently operate as a QF, as defined under the PURPA. This business entered into a long-term contract with an electric utility that had a mandatory obligation to purchase power from QFs at the utility's avoided cost (i.e. the likely costs for both energy and capital investment that would have been incurred by the purchasing utility if that utility had to provide its own generating capacity or purchase it from another source). To be a QF, a cogeneration facility must produce electricity and useful thermal energy for an industrial or commercial process or heating or cooling application in certain proportions to the facility's total energy output and meet certain efficiency standards. To be a QF, a small power production facility must generally use a renewable resource as its energy input and meet certain size criteria or be a cogeneration facility that simultaneously generates electricity and processes heat or steam.

Our non-QF generation businesses in the U.S. currently operate as Exempt Wholesale Generators as defined under the EPAct of 1992, amending the Public Utility Holding Company Act (“PUHCA”). These businesses, subject to approval of FERC, have the right to sell power at market-based rates, either directly to the wholesale market or to a third-party offtaker such as a power marketer or utility/industrial customer. Under the FPA and FERC's regulations, approval from FERC to sell wholesale power at market-based rates is generally dependent upon a showing to



19 | 2020 Annual Report

FERC that the seller lacks market power in generation and transmission, that the seller and its affiliates cannot erect other barriers to market entry, and that there is no opportunity for abusive transactions involving regulated affiliates of the seller.
The U.S. wholesale electricity market consists of multiple distinct regional markets that are subject to both federal regulation, as implemented by FERC, and regional regulation as defined by rules designed and implemented by the RTOs, non-profit corporations that operate the regional transmission grid and maintain organized markets for electricity. These rules, for the most part, govern such items as the determination of the market mechanism for setting the system marginal price for energy and the establishment of guidelines and incentives for the addition of new capacity. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors for additional discussion on U.S. regulatory matters.
AES Southland
Business Description In terms of aggregate installed capacity, AES Southland is one of the largest generation operators in California by aggregate installed capacity, with an installed gross capacity of 3,9413,611 MW accounting for approximately 5%at the end of the state's installed capacity and 17% of the peak demand of SCE.2020. The threefive coastal power plants comprising AES Southland are in areas that are critical for local reliability and play an important role in integrating the increasing amounts of renewable generation resources in California. AES Southland is composed of three once-through cooling ("OTC") power plants, two combined cycle gas-fired generation facilities and an interconnected battery-based energy storage facility.
All of AES Southland's capacity isHuntington Beach, LLC, AES Alamitos, LLC, and AES Redondo Beach ("Southland OTC units") are contracted through a long-term agreement (the “Tolling Agreement”Resource Adequacy Purchase Agreements (“RAPAs”), expiring on May 31, 2018. In 2017,. Under the RAPAs, as approved by the California Public Utilities Commission, approved the Resource Adequacy Purchase Agreements (the “RAPAs”) between the SCE and AES Huntington Beach, LLC and AES Alamitos, LLC for the period of June 1, 2018 through 2020, and the SCE and AES Redondo Beach for the period of June 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. Under the RAPAs, thethese generating stations will only provide resource adequacy capacity, and have no obligation to produce or sell any energy to SCE.the RAPA counterparty. However, the generating stations mayare required to bid energy into the California ISO markets.
Under Compensation under these RAPAs is dependent on the current Tolling Agreement, approximately 98%availability of AES Southland's revenue comes from availability. Historically,the AES Southland has generally met or exceeded its contractualunits in the California ISO market. Failure to achieve the minimum availability requirements under the Tolling Agreement and may capture bonuses for exceeding availability requirementstarget would result in peak periods.an assessed penalty.
Under the Tolling Agreement, the offtaker provides gas to the three facilities thus AES Southland is not exposed to significant fuel price risk. If the units operate better than the guaranteed efficiency, AES Southland gets credit for the gas that is not consumed. Conversely, AES Southland is responsible for the cost of fuel in excess of what would have been consumed had the guaranteed efficiency been achieved. The business is also exposed to replacement power costs for a limited period if dispatched by the offtaker and not able to meet the required generation.
Environmental Regulation — For a discussion of environmental regulatory matters affecting U.S. Generation, see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
Re-powering In November 2014, AES Southland was awarded 20-year contracts by SCESouthern California Edison ("SCE") to provide 1,284 MW of combined cycle gas-fired generation and 100 MW of interconnected battery-based energy storage. Understorage ("Southland Energy units"). The agreements for the combined cycle gas-fired generation were amended in 2019 and capacity was increased to 1,299 MW. The contracts are RAPAs with annual energy put options. If AES Southland exercises the annual put option, all capacity, energy and ancillary services will be sold to SCE in exchange for a fixed monthly capacity fee that covers fixed operating cost, debt service, and return on capital. In addition, SCE will reimburse variable costs and provide the natural gas and charging electricity.gas.
In April 2017, the California Energy Commission unanimously approved the licenses for the newSouthland Energy combined cycle projects at AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach. In June 2017, AES closed the financing of $2.0$2 billion, funded with a combination of non-recourse debt and AES equity. Construction of the combined cycle capacity began in 2017.
At the end of 2019, five of the twelve Southland OTC generation units were retired to support the construction efforts of the Southland Energy combined cycle gas-fired generation projects in anticipation of COD, which was reached in early February 2020. On January 23, 2020, the Statewide Advisory Committee on Cooling Water Intake Structures adopted a recommendation to present to the California State Water Resources Board ("SWRCB") to extend OTC compliance dates for the remaining Southland OTC units at AES Huntington Beach and AES Alamitos until December 31, 2023 and AES Redondo Beach until December 31, 2021. On September 1, 2020, in response to a request by the state's energy, utility, and grid operators and regulators, the SWRCB approved amendments to its OTC. The SWRCB OTC Policy previously required the shutdown and permanent retirement of all remaining Southland OTC generating units by December 31, 2020. See United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and RegulationsCooling Water Intake for further discussion of AES Southland’s plans regarding the OTC Policy.
The construction of this new capacity started during 2017the Alamitos Energy Center, an interconnected battery-based energy storage facility, began in June 2019 and commercial operation of the gas-fired capacity is expected in 2020 and the energy storage capacity inwas achieved on January 1, 2021.
Key Financial Drivers — AES Southland's contractual availability is one of the single most important driverdrivers of operations. Itsoperations, along with market demand and prices for gas and electricity.


20 | 2020 Annual Report

AES Hawaii
Business Description — AES Hawaii receives an energy payment from its offtaker under a PPA expiring in 2022, which is based on a fixed rate indexed to the Gross National Product Implicit Price Deflator. Since the energy payment is not directly linked to market prices for fuel, the risk arising from fluctuations in market prices for coal is borne by AES Hawaii. AES Hawaii has entered into fixed-price coal purchase commitments through 2021 and plans to seek additional fuel purchase commitments during 2021 to manage fuel price risk in 2022.
In July 2020, the Hawaii State Legislature passed Senate Bill 2629 which will prohibit AES Hawaii from generating electricity from coal after December 31, 2022. This will restrict the Company from contracting the asset beyond the expiration of its existing PPA, and as a result, AES plans to retire the AES Hawaii facility in 2022.
Key Financial Drivers — AES Hawaii's financial results are driven by fuel costs and outages. The Company has entered into long-term fuel contracts to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuating prices. In addition, major maintenance requiring units to be off-line is performed during periods when power demand is typically lower.
Puerto Rico
Business Description — AES Puerto Rico owns and operates a coal-fired cogeneration plant and a solar plant of 524 MW and 24 MW, respectively, representing approximately 8% of the installed capacity in Puerto Rico. Both plants are generally requiredfully contracted through long-term PPAs with PREPA expiring in 2027 and 2032, respectively. AES Puerto Rico receives a capacity payment based on the plants' twelve month rolling average availability, receiving the full payment when the availability is 90% or higher. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Puerto Rico for further discussion of the long-term PPAs with PREPA.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to, achieve at least 86% availability in each contract year. AES Southland has historically met or exceeded its contractualimproved operational performance and plant availability.
Additional U.S. Generation Businesses
Regulatory Framework and Market StructureForPuerto Rico has a single electric grid managed by PREPA, a state-owned entity that provides virtually all of the non-renewable businesses, coalelectric power consumed in Puerto Rico and generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to 1.5 million customers. The Puerto Rico Energy Bureau is the main regulatory body. The bureau approves wholesale and retail rates, sets efficiency and interconnection standards, and oversees PREPA's compliance with Puerto Rico's renewable portfolio standard.
Puerto Rico's electricity is 97% produced by thermal plants (43% from natural gas, are used as the primary fuels. Coal prices are set by market factors internationally, while natural gas is generally set domestically. Price variations for these fuels can change the composition of generation costs36% from petroleum, and energy prices in our generation businesses.18% from coal).
Many of these generation businesses have entered into long-term PPAs with utilities or other offtakers. Some businesses with PPAs have mechanisms to recover fuel costs from the offtaker, including an energy payment partially based on the market price of fuel. When market price fluctuations in fuel are borne by the offtaker, revenue may change as fuel prices fluctuate, but the variable margin or profitability should remain consistent. These businesses often have an opportunity to increase or decrease profitability from payments under their PPAs depending on such items as plant efficiency and availability, heat rate, ability to buy coal at lower costs through AES' global sourcing program and fuel flexibility.AES Clean Energy
Several of our generation businesses in the U.S. currently operate as QFs, including Hawaii, Shady Point and Warrior Run, as defined under the PURPA. These businesses entered into long-term contracts with electric utilities that had a mandatory obligation to purchase power from QFs at the utility's avoided cost (i.e., the likely costs for


both energy and capital investment that would have been incurred by the purchasing utility if that utility had to provide its own generating capacity or purchase it from another source). To be a QF, a cogeneration facility must produce electricity and useful thermal energy for an industrial or commercial process or heating or cooling applications in certain proportions to the facility's total energy output and meet certain efficiency standards. To be a QF, a small power production facility must generally use a renewable resource as its energy input and meet certain size criteria.
Our non-QF generation businesses in the U.S. currently operate as Exempt Wholesale Generators as defined under EPAct 1992. These businesses, subject to approval of FERC, have the right to sell power at market-based rates, either directly to the wholesale market or to a third-party offtaker such as a power marketer or utility/industrial customer. Under the Federal Power Act and FERC's regulations, approval from FERC to sell wholesale power at market-based rates is generally dependent upon a showing to FERC that the seller lacks market power in generation and transmission, that the seller and its affiliates cannot erect other barriers to market entry and that there is no opportunity for abusive transactions involving regulated affiliates of the seller.
The U.S. wholesale electricity market consists of multiple distinct regional markets that are subject to both federal regulation, as implemented by the FERC, and regional regulation as defined by rules designed and implemented by the RTOs, non-profit corporations that operate the regional transmission grid and maintain organized markets for electricity. These rules, for the most part, govern such items as the determination of the market mechanism for setting the system marginal price for energy and the establishment of guidelines and incentives for the addition of new capacity. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors for additional discussion on U.S. regulatory matters.
Business Description Additional businesses include thermal, wind, and solar generating facilities, of which our U.S. Renewables businesses and AES Hawaii are the most significant.
U.S. Renewables
sPower owns and/or operates more than 150 utility and distributed electrical generation systems across the U.S., actively buying, developing, constructing and operating renewable assets in the United States.
AES Distributed Energy develops, constructs and sells electricity generated by photovoltaic solar energy systems to public sector, utility, and non-profit entities through PPAs.
Excluding sPower wind plants, AES has 734 MW of wind capacity in the U.S., located in California, Texas and West Virginia. Mountain View I & II, Mountain View IV and Buffalo Gap I sell under long-term PPAs through which the energy price on the entire production of these facilities is guaranteed. Laurel Mountain, Buffalo Gap II and Buffalo Gap III are exposed to the volatility of energy prices and their revenue may change materially as energy prices fluctuate in their respective markets of operations.
AES manages the U.S. Renewablesrenewables portfolio, which comprises AES Distributed Energy, sPower and other renewable assets, as part of its broader investments in the U.S., leveraging operational On January 4, 2021, the sPower and commercial resourcesAES Distributed Energy development platforms were merged to supplementform AES Clean Energy Development, which will serve as the experienced subject matter expertsdevelopment vehicle for all future renewable projects in the renewable industry to achieve optimal results. A portion of U.S. Solar projectssPower remains an AES unconsolidated affiliate after this merger. Collectively, AES Distributed Energy, sPower, AES Clean Energy Development, and the other renewable assets in the U.S. are referred to as AES Clean Energy.
Prior to the merger, both AES and sPower were recognized leaders in renewable development in the U.S. Together, AES Clean Energy is one of the top renewables growth platforms and the expanded team aims to solve our customers' energy challenges. AES Clean Energy offers its customers an expanded portfolio of innovative solutions based on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to accelerate their energy futures. Generation capacity of the systems owned and/or operated under AES Clean Energy is 2,983 MW across the U.S. with another 299 MW under construction. This capacity includes 2,066 MW of solar, 1,085 MW of wind, and 131 MW of energy storage.
A majority of windsolar projects under AES Clean Energy have been financed with tax equity structures. Under these tax equity structures, the tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. Based on certain liquidation provisions of the tax equity structures, this could result in variability to earnings attributable to AES compared to the earnings reported at the facilities.
Key Financial Drivers — The financial results of AES HawaiiClean Energy are primarily driven by the efficient construction and operation of renewable energy facilities across the U.S. under long-term PPAs, through which the energy price on the entire production of these facilities is guaranteed. The financial results of renewable assets are


21 | 2020 Annual Report

primarily driven by the amount of wind or solar resource at the facilities, availability of facilities, and growth in projects.
Laurel Mountain, Buffalo Gap II and Buffalo Gap III are exposed to the volatility of energy prices and their revenue may change materially as energy prices fluctuate in their respective markets of operations. Laurel Mountain also operates 16 MW of battery energy storage that is sold into the PJM market as regulation energy. For these projects, PJM and ERCOT power prices impact financial results.
Development Strategy — As states, communities, and organizations of all types make commitments and plan to reduce their carbon footprints, renewables are the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the U.S. AES Clean Energy works with its customers to co-create and deliver the smarter, greener energy solutions that meet their needs, including 24/7 carbon-free energy. The merged renewables platform has brought together sPower's and AES' differentiated capabilities in solar, wind, and energy storage to accelerate customers' energy transitions.
AES Hawaii receivesClean Energy has a fuel payment fromrenewable project backlog that includes 2,206 MW of projects for which long-term PPAs have been signed or, as applicable, tariffs have been assigned through a regulatory process. The budget for construction of the projects currently under construction and the contracted projects is over $3.9 billion. AES Clean Energy is actively developing new products and renewable sites to serve the current and future needs of its offtaker under a PPA expiring in 2022, which is basedcustomers.
U.S. Environmental Regulation
For information on a fixed rate indexed to the Gross National Product — Implicit Price Deflator. Since the fuel payment is not directly linked to market prices for fuel, the risk arising from fluctuations in market prices for coal is borne by AES Hawaii.
To mitigate the risk from such fluctuations, AES Hawaii has entered into fixed-price coal purchase commitments that end in December 2018; the business could be subject to variability in coal pricing beginning in January 2019. To mitigate fuel risk beyond December 2018, AES Hawaii plans to seek additional fuel purchase commitments on favorable terms. However, if market prices rise and AES Hawaii is unable to procure coal supply on favorable terms, the financial performance of AES Hawaii could be materially and adversely affected.
Environmental Regulation — For a discussion ofcompliance with environmental laws and regulations affecting the U.S. business, see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
El Salvador
Business Description — AES El Salvador is the majority owner of four of the five distribution companies operating in El Salvador (CAESS, CLESA, EEO and DEUSEM). AES El Salvador's territory covers 77% of the country and accounted for 3,640 GWh of the wholesale market energy sales during 2020. AES El Salvador is also a 50% owner and operator of Bosforo, a 100 MW solar farm. The energy produced by this solar farm is fully contracted by AES' utilities in El Salvador.
In addition, AES El Salvador offers customers non-regulated services such as energy trading, electromechanical construction, O&M of electrical assets, EPC, pole rental, and tax collection for municipalities.
Key Financial Drivers U.S. thermal generation's financialFinancial results are driven by fuel costs and outages. The Company has entered into long-term fuel contracts to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuating prices. Inmany factors, including, but not limited to:

improved operational performance;

addition, major maintenance requiring units to be off-line is performed during periods when powervariability in energy demand is typically lower. The financial results of U.S. Wind are primarily driven by increased productionweather; and
the impact of fuel oil prices on energy tariff prices, which affect cash flow due to fastera three-month delay in the pass-through of energy costs to the tariffs charged to customers.
Regulatory Framework and less turbulent windMarket Structure — El Salvador's national electric market is composed of generation, distribution, transmission, and reduced turbine outages. In addition, PJMmarketing businesses, a market and ERCOT power prices impact financial resultssystem operator, and regulatory agencies. The operation of the transmission system and the wholesale market is based on production costs with a marginal economic model that rewards efficiency and allows investors to have guaranteed profits, while end users receive affordable rates. The energy sector is governed by the General Electricity Law, which establishes two regulatory entities responsible for monitoring its compliance:
The National Energy Council is the highest authority on energy policy and strategy, and the coordinating body for the wind projectsdifferent energy sectors. One of its main objectives is to promote investment in non-conventional renewable sources to diversify the energy matrix.
The General Superintendence of Electricity and Telecommunications regulates the market and sets consumer prices, and, jointly with the distribution companies in El Salvador, developed the tariff calculation applicable from 2018 until 2022. The next tariff calculation is scheduled for 2022, and will be effective starting in 2023.
El Salvador has a national electric grid that are operating without long-term contractsinterconnects directly with Guatemala and Honduras, allowing transactions with all Central American countries. The sector has approximately 1,799 MW of installed capacity, composed of thermal (40%), hydroelectric (31%), solar (11%), biomass (9%), and geothermal (9%) generation plants.
Development Strategy — In order to explore new business opportunities, AES El Salvador created AES


22 | 2020 Annual Report

Soluciones, an LED public lighting service provider and the main commercial and industrial solar photovoltaic EPC provider in the country. AES Next is also the O&M services provider for all or some of their capacity. The financial results of U.S. Solar are primarily driven by the amount of sunshine hours available at the facilities, cell maintenance and growth in projects. Tax reform enacted December 22, 2017 will change the taxation of U.S. Generation’s operations beginning in 2018. For additional details see Key Trends and Uncertainties in Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Bosforo project.
Construction and Development — Planned capital projects include the AES Southland re-powering described above. In addition to the new construction project, U.S. Generation performs capital projects related to major plant maintenance, repairs and upgrades to be compliant with new environmental laws and regulations.

Andes

23 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g7.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.


24 | 2020 Annual Report

South America SBU
Generation Our AndesSouth America SBU has generation facilities in threefour countries — Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Argentina.Brazil. AES Gener whichis a publicly traded company in Chile and owns all of our assets in Chile, AES Chivor in Colombia and TermoAndes in Argentina, as detailed below, is a publicly listed company in Chile.below. AES has a 66.7% ownership interest in AES Gener and this business is consolidated in our financial statements. AES Brasil (the business formerly branded as AES Tietê) is a publicly traded company in Brazil. AES controls and consolidates AES Brasil through its 44% economic interest.
Operating installed capacity of our AndesSouth America SBU totals 9,32612,304 MW, of which 44%34%, 45%29%, 8%, and 11%29% are located in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Colombia,Brazil, respectively. The following table lists our AndesSouth America SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
Chivor Colombia Hydro 1,000
 67% 2000 Short-term VariousChivorColombiaHydro1,000 67 %20002020-2037Various
CastillaCastillaColombiaSolar21 67 %20192034Ecopetrol
Tunjita Colombia Hydro 20
 67% 2016 TunjitaColombiaHydro20 67 %2016
Colombia Subtotal 1,020
   Colombia Subtotal1,041 
Guacolda (1)
 Chile Coal 760
 33% 2000 2018-2032 Various
Electrica Santiago (2)
 Chile Gas/Diesel 750
 67% 2000 
 
Gener-SIC (3)
 Chile Hydro/Coal/Diesel/Biomass 690
 67% 2000 2020-2037 Various
Gener - Chile (1)
Gener - Chile (1)
ChileCoal/Hydro/Diesel/Solar/Wind/Biomass1,578 67 %20002020-2040Various
Guacolda (2)
Guacolda (2)
ChileCoal764 33 %20002020-2032Various
Electrica Angamos Chile Coal 558
 67% 2011 2026-2037 Minera Escondida, Minera Spence, Quebrada BlancaElectrica AngamosChileCoal558 67 %20112021Minera Escondida, Minera Spence, Quebrada Blanca
Cochrane Chile Coal 550
 40% 2016 2030-2034 SQM, Sierra Gorda, Quebrada BlancaCochraneChileCoal550 40 %20162030-2037SQM, Sierra Gorda, Quebrada Blanca
Gener-SING (4)
 Chile Coal 277
 67% 2000 2018-2037 Minera Escondida, Codelco, SQM, Quebrada Blanca
Electrica Ventanas (5)
 Chile Coal 272
 67% 2010 2025 Gener
Electrica Campiche (6)
 Chile Coal 272
 67% 2013 2020 Gener
Andes Solar Chile Solar 21
 67% 2016 2037 Quebrada Blanca
Cochrane ES Chile Energy Storage 20
 40% 2016 Cochrane ESChileEnergy Storage20 40 %2016
Electrica Angamos ES Chile Energy Storage 20
 67% 2011 
 
Electrica Angamos ESChileEnergy Storage20 67 %2011
Norgener ES (Los Andes) Chile Energy Storage 12
 67% 2009 
 
Norgener ES (Los Andes)ChileEnergy Storage12 67 %2009
Alfalfal Virtual ReservoirAlfalfal Virtual ReservoirChileEnergy Storage10 67 %2020
Chile Subtotal 4,202
   Chile Subtotal3,512 
TermoAndes (7)
 Argentina Gas/Diesel 643
 67% 2000 Short-term Various
TermoAndes (3)
TermoAndes (3)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel643 67 %20002020Various
AES Gener Subtotal 5,865
   AES Gener Subtotal5,196 
Alicura Argentina Hydro 1,050
 100% 2000 2017 VariousAlicuraArgentinaHydro1,050 100 %2000
Paraná-GT Argentina Gas/Diesel 845
 100% 2001 
 
Paraná-GTArgentinaGas/Diesel870 100 %2001
San Nicolás Argentina Coal/Gas/Oil 675
 100% 1993 
 
San NicolásArgentinaCoal/Gas/Oil/Energy Storage691 100 %1993
Guillermo Brown (8)
 Argentina Gas/Diesel 576
 % 2016 
Los Caracoles (8)
 Argentina Hydro 125
 % 2009 2019 Energia Provincial Sociedad del Estado (EPSE)
Guillermo Brown (4)
Guillermo Brown (4)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel576 — %2016
Cabra Corral Argentina Hydro 102
 100% 1995 
 VariousCabra CorralArgentinaHydro102 100 %1995Various
Vientos BonaerensesVientos BonaerensesArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
Vientos NeuquinosVientos NeuquinosArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
Ullum Argentina Hydro 45
 100% 1996 
 VariousUllumArgentinaHydro45 100 %1996Various
Sarmiento Argentina Gas/Diesel 33
 100% 1996 
 
SarmientoArgentinaGas/Diesel33 100 %1996
El Tunal Argentina Hydro 10
 100% 1995 
 VariousEl TunalArgentinaHydro10 100 %1995Various
Argentina Subtotal 3,461
   Argentina Subtotal3,577 
Tietê (5)
Tietê (5)
BrazilHydro2,658 44 %19992029Various
Alto Sertão IIAlto Sertão IIBrazilWind386 44 %20172033-2035Various
VentusVentusBrazilWind187 44 %20202034Regulated Market
GuaimbêGuaimbêBrazilSolar150 44 %20182037CCEE
AGV SolarAGV SolarBrazilSolar75 44 %20192039Various
Boa HoraBoa HoraBrazilSolar69 44 %20192035CCEE
Drogaria AraujoDrogaria AraujoBrazilSolar44 %20192029Drogaria Araujo
Brasil Community SolarBrasil Community SolarBrazilSolar44 %2020
AES Brasil SubtotalAES Brasil Subtotal3,531 
 9,326
   12,304 
_____________________________
(1)Gener - Chile plants: Alfalfal, Andes Solar, Andes Solar 2a, Laguna Verde, Laja, Los Cururos, Maitenes, Norgener 1, Norgener 2, Queltehues, Ventanas 2, Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4 and Volcán. In December 2020, AES Gener requested the retirement of Ventanas 1 and 2. Ventanas 1 initiated strategic reserve mode and Ventanas 2 is waiting for approval.
(2)Guacolda is comprised of five coal-fired units under Guacolda Energia S.A., an unconsolidated entity for which the results of operations are reflected in Net equity in earnings of affiliates. The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 34%.


(1)
Guacolda plants: Guacolda 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are unconsolidated entities for which the results of operations are reflected in Net equity in earnings of affiliates. The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 33%.
25 | 2020 Annual Report
(2)
Electrica Santiago plants: Nueva Renca, Renca, Los Vientos and Santa Lidia. AES Gener announced the sale of this business in December 2017.
(3)
Gener-SIC plants: Alfalfal, Laguna Verde, Laguna Verde Turbogas, Laja, Maitenes, Queltehues, Ventanas 1, Ventanas 2 and Volcán.
(4)
Gener-SING plants: Norgener 1 and Norgener 2.
(5)
Electrica Ventanas plant: Ventanas 3.



(6)
Electrica Campiche plant: Ventanas 4.
(7)
TermoAndes is located in Argentina, but is connected to both the SING in Chile and the SADI in Argentina.
(8)
AES operates these facilities through management or O&M agreements and owns no equity interest in these businesses.
(3)TermoAndes is located in Argentina, but is connected to both the SEN in Chile and the SADI in Argentina.
(4)AES operates this facility through management or O&M agreements and to date owns no equity interest in the business.
(5)Tietê hydro plants: Água Vermelha, Bariri, Barra Bonita, Caconde, Euclides da Cunha, Ibitinga, Limoeiro, Mogi-Guaçu, Nova Avanhandava, Promissão, Sao Joaquim and Sao Jose.
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the AndesSouth America SBU:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial OperationsBusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
Alto Maipo Chile Hydro 531
 62% 
1H 2019 (1)
Tucano Phase 2Tucano Phase 2BrazilWind167 44 %2H 2022
Tucano Phase 1Tucano Phase 1BrazilWind155 44 %2H 2022
McDonaldsMcDonaldsBrazilSolar44 %1H 2021
Farmácias São JoãoFarmácias São JoãoBrazilSolar44 %1H 2021
AES Brasil SubtotalAES Brasil Subtotal330 
Alto Maipo (1)
Alto Maipo (1)
ChileHydro531 62 %2H 2021
Los OlmosLos OlmosChileWind110 67 %1H 2021
Campo LindoCampo LindoChileWind73 67 %1H 2021
MesamávidaMesamávidaChileWind68 67 %2H 2021
Andes Solar 2bAndes Solar 2bChileSolar180 67 %2H 2021
Energy Storage112 
Chile SubtotalChile Subtotal1,074 
San FernandoSan FernandoColombiaSolar59 67 %2H 2021
Colombia SubtotalColombia Subtotal59 
1,463 
_____________________________
(1)     Alto Maipo is the largest project in construction in the Chilean market. When completed, it will include 75 km of tunnels, two power houses and 17 km of transmission lines.

The majority of projects under construction have executed mid- to long-term PPAs.
In June 2018, the Company completed the sale of its entire 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo, a distribution business in Brazil. Prior to its sale, Eletropaulo was accounted for as an equity method investment and its results of operations and financial position were reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
In September 2020, the Company completed the sale of its entire interest in AES Uruguaiana, a gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in Brazil.


(1)
26 | 2020 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our AndesSouth America facilities:
South America Businesses
Andes Businessesaes-20201231_g8.jpg
Chile
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Chile has operated a single power market, managed by CISEN, since November 2017. Previously, Chile had two main power systems, the SIC and SING, largely as a result of its geographic shape and size. The SIC served approximately 92% of the Chilean population, including the densely populated Santiago Metropolitan Region, representing 75% of the country's electricity demand. The SING, which mainly supplied mining companies, served about 6% of the Chilean population, representing 25% of Chile's electricity demand.
CISEN coordinates all generation and transmission companies previously in the SIC and SING. CISEN minimizes the operating costs of the electricity system, while maximizing service quality and reliability requirements. CISEN dispatches plants in merit order based on their variable cost of production, allowing for electricity to be supplied at the lowest available cost. In the SIC, thermoelectric generation is required to fulfill demand not satisfied by hydroelectric output and is critical to guaranteeing reliable and dependable electricity supply under dry hydrological conditions. In the SING, which includes the Atacama Desert, the driest desert in the world, thermoelectric capacity represents the majority of installed capacity as hydroelectric generation is not feasible. The


fuels used for thermoelectric generation, mainly coal, diesel and LNG, are indexed to international prices. In 2017, the generation installed capacity in the Chilean market was composed primarily of the following:
  SIC SING CISEN
Thermoelectric 44% 84% 54%
Hydroelectric 38%  29%
Solar 8% 11% 9%
Wind 7% 3% 6%
Other 3% 2% 2%
In the SIC, where hydroelectric plants represent a large part of the system's installed capacity, hydrological conditions influence reservoir water levels and largely determine the dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants and, therefore, influence spot market prices. Precipitation in Chile occurs principally in the southern cone mostly from June to August, and is scarce during the remainder of the year. During 2017 spot prices were also affected by a 14% increase in installed renewable energy capacity, totaling 564 MW, bringing total installed capacity to 4,719 MW.
The Ministry of Energy has primary responsibility for the Chilean electricity system directly or through the National Energy Commission and the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels. The electricity sector is divided into three segments: generation, transmission and distribution. Generally, generation and transmission growth is subject to market competition, while transmission operation and distribution are subject to price regulation. In July 2016, modifications to the Transmission Law were enacted. This law establishes that the transmission system will be completely paid for by the end-users, gradually allocating the costs on the demand side from 2019 through 2034.
All generators can sell energy through contracts with regulated distribution companies or directly to unregulated customers. Unregulated customers are customers whose connected capacity is higher than 2 MW. Customers with connected capacity between 0.5 MW and 2.0 MW can opt for regulated or unregulated contracts for a minimum period of four years. By law, both regulated and unregulated customers are required to purchase all electricity under contract. Generators may also sell energy to other power generation companies on a short-term basis at negotiated prices outside the spot market. Electricity prices in Chile are denominated in U.S. dollars, although payments are made in Chilean pesos.
Business Description — In Chile, through AES Gener, we are engaged in the generation and supply of electricity (energy and capacity) in the CISEN.SEN—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. AES Gener is the second largest generation operator in Chile within terms of installed capacity of 4,150with 3,450 MW, excluding energy storage, and TermoAndes, andhas a market share of approximately 18%13% as of December 31, 2017.2020.
AES Gener owns a diversified generation portfolio in Chile in terms of geography, technology, customers, and fuel source.energy resources. AES Gener's installed capacity isgeneration plants are located near the principal electricity consumption centers, including Santiago, Valparaiso, and Antofagasta. AES Gener's diverse generation portfolio provides flexibility for the management of contractual obligations with regulated and unregulated customers, provides backup energy to the spot market and facilitates operations under a variety of market and hydrological conditions.
Our commercialAES Gener's Green Blend and Extend strategy in Chile aims to maximize margin while reducing cash flow volatility. To achieve this, we contractreduce carbon intensity and incorporate renewable energy to extend our existing conventional PPAs. This strategy de-links our PPAs from legacy fossil resources, grows our renewable energy portfolio, and delivers a significant portioncompetitive, reliable energy solution. In line with the "green blend and extend" strategy, AES Gener has committed to not build additional coal-based power plants and to advance the development of our coalnew renewable projects, including the implementation of battery energy storage systems ("BESS") and hydroelectric baseload capacity under long-term agreements with a diversified customer base. Power plants not considered within our baseload capacity (higher variable cost units, mainly dieselother technological innovations that will provide greater flexibility and gas fired) sell energy onreliability to the spot market when operating during scarce system supply conditions, such as low hydrology and/or plant outages. In Chile, sales on the spot market are made only to other generation companies who are members of the CISEN at the system marginal cost.system.
AES Gener currently has long-term contracts, with an average remaining term of approximately 119 years, with regulated distribution companies and unregulated customers, such as mining and industrial companies. In general,


27 | 2020 Annual Report

these long-term contracts include both fixed and variable payments which are indexedpass-through mechanisms for fuel costs along with price indexations to the CPI and the international price of coal. In some cases, the contracts include pass-through of fuel and regulatory costs, including changes in law.U.S. Consumer Price Index ("CPI").
In addition to energy payments, AES Gener also receives capacity payments to remain availablecompensate for availability during periods of peak demand. CISENThe grid operator, Coordinador Electrico Nacional ("CEN"), annually determines the capacity requirements for each power plant. The capacity price is fixed semiannually by the National Energy Commission and indexed to the CPI and other relevant indices.
Key Financial Drivers Hedge strategy at AES Gener limits volatility to the underlying financial drivers. In addition, financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
dry hydrology scenarios;
forced outages;
changes in current regulatory rulings altering the ability to pass through or recover certain costs;
fluctuations of the Chilean peso;
tax policy changes;
legislation promoting renewable energy and/or more restrictive regulations on thermal generation assets; and
market price risk when re-contracting.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure The Chilean government allowselectricity industry is divided into three business segments: generation, transmission, and distribution. Private companies operate in all three segments, and generators can enter into PPAs to sell energy to regulated and unregulated customers, as well as to other generators in the exportspot market.
Chile operates in a single power market, referred to as the SEN, which is managed by the grid operator CEN. The SEN has an installed capacity of energy generated from26,056 MW, and represents 99% of the installed generation capacity of the country.
CEN coordinates all generation and transmission companies in the SEN. CEN minimizes the operating costs of the electricity system, while maximizing service quality and reliability requirements. CEN dispatches plants in merit order based on their variable cost of production, allowing for electricity to be supplied at the SINGlowest available cost. In the south-central region of the SEN, thermoelectric generation is required to Argentina utilizing transmission lines ownedfulfill demand not satisfied by AES Gener.hydroelectric, solar, and wind output and is critical to provide reliable and dependable electricity supply under dry hydrological conditions in the highest demand area of the SEN. In the northern region of the SEN, which includes the Atacama Desert, thermoelectric capacity represents the majority of installed capacity. The fuels used for thermoelectric generation, mainly coal, diesel, and LNG, are indexed to international prices. In 2020, the installed generation capacity in the Chilean market was composed of 48% thermoelectric, 27% hydroelectric, 13% solar, 10% wind, and 2% other fuel sources.
Environmental Regulation — During 2016,Hydroelectric plants represent a significant portion of the Environmentalsystem's installed capacity. Precipitation and snow melt impact hydrological conditions in Chile. Rain occurs principally from June to August and snow melt occurs from September to December. These factors affect dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants, thereby influencing spot market prices.
The Ministry updated the Atmospheric


Decontamination Plansof Energy has primary responsibility for the Santiago,Chilean electricity system directly or through the National Energy Commission and the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels.
All generators can sell energy through contracts with regulated distribution companies or directly to unregulated customers. Unregulated customers are customers whose connected capacity is higher than 5 MW. Customers with connected capacity between 0.5 MW and 5.0 MW can opt for regulated or unregulated contracts for a minimum period of four years. By law, both regulated and unregulated customers are required to purchase all electricity under contracts. Generators may also sell energy to other power generation companies on a short-term basis at negotiated prices outside the spot market. Electricity prices in Chile are denominated in USD, although payments are made in Chilean pesos.
The Chilean government’s decarbonization plan includes the complete retirement of the SEN coal fleet by the end of 2040 and carbon neutrality by 2050. During the year, AES Gener announced its commitment to shut down its Ventanas 1 coal-fired plant in 2020 and Huasco regions. Ourits Ventanas 2 coal-fired plant in June 2022 or earlier, pending resolution of current transmission constraints, and to disconnect both plants from the SEN in these regions2025. On December 26, 2020, the


28 | 2020 Annual Report

Ministry of Energy’s Supreme Decree Number 42 went into effect, allowing coal plants to enter into Strategic Reserve Status (“SRS”) and receive 60% of capacity payments for the 5-year period following its shutdown to remain connected as a backup in case of a system emergency. Following the issuance of this regulation and per the disconnection and termination agreement signed with the Chilean government in June 2019, the Ventanas 1 power plant was shut down on December 29, 2020 to enter into SRS.
Environmental RegulationNueva Renca,In March 2019, a new decontamination plan for the Ventanas region was approved. We are currently implementing the requirements defined by the plan which will impact our Ventanas and Guacolda — are evaluating operational improvements and additional investments to comply with the new requirements. As of December 31, 2017, the regulator did not issue the decree that provides the framework and time line for these investments.businesses.
Chilean law requires everyall electricity generatorgenerators to supply a certain portion of itstheir total contractual obligations with NCREs.non-conventional renewable energy ("NCREs"). Generation companies are able to meet this requirement by constructingbuilding NCRE generation capacity (wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and small hydroelectric technology) or purchasing NCREs from qualified generators. Non-compliance with the NCRE requirements will result in fines. AES Gener currently fulfills the NCRE requirements by utilizing AES Gener's solar and biomass power plants and by purchasing NCREs from other generation companies. AES Gener has also sold and contracted certain water rights to companies to construct small hydro projects to ensure longer term NCRE compliance. At present, AES Gener is in the process of negotiating additional NCRE supply contracts to meet the future requirements.
In September 2014 a new emission tax, or "green tax" was enacted, effective January 2017. EmissionsSince 2017, emissions of PM,particulate matter, SO2, NOxX, and CO2 are monitored for plants with an installed capacity over 50 MW; these emissions are taxed. In the case of CO2, the tax will beis equivalent to $5 per ton emitted. Certain PPAs originating from the SING have "change of law" clauses allowing the Company to pass the green tax costs to customers. Distributionunregulated customers, while some distribution PPAs originating from the SIC do not allow for the pass through of these costs; however,costs.
Development Strategy — AES Gener is committed to reducing the costs can be passedcoal intensity of the Chilean power grid and plans to increase the renewable energy capacity in its portfolio. As part of this commitment, and in addition to the 531 MW hydroelectric generation that Alto Maipo will deliver to the system, AES Gener purchased the 110 MW Los Cururos wind farm and its substation in northern Chile, and has finished construction on the 80 MW Andes 2a facility. Also under construction are the 110 MW Los Olmos wind farm, 66 MW Mesamávida wind farm, 73 MW Campo Lindo wind farm, and 180 MW Andes Solar 2b facility, which also includes 112 MW of BESS, to supply agreements with its main mining customers in execution of the new Green Blend and Extend strategy. In total, the pipeline currently has 4.4 GW under development at different stages and diversified geographically.
AES Gener executes its Green Blend and Extend strategy by integrating renewable energy sources into its portfolio, and by providing contracting options that contain a mix of both renewable and nonrenewable solutions.
Colombia
Business Description — We operate in Colombia through AES Chivor, a subsidiary of AES Gener, which owns a hydroelectric plant with an installed capacity of 1,000 MW and Tunjita, a 20 MW run-of-river hydroelectric plant, both located approximately 160 km east of Bogota, as well as Castilla, a 21 MW solar facility. AES Chivor’s installed capacity accounted for approximately 6% of system capacity at the end of 2020. AES Chivor is dependent on hydrological conditions, which influence generation and spot prices of non-contracted generation in Colombia.
AES Chivor's commercial strategy aims to unregulated customers.execute contracts with commercial and industrial customers and bid in public tenders, mainly with distribution companies, in order to reduce margin volatility with proper portfolio risk management. The Companyremaining energy generated by our portfolio is currently discussingsold to the pass-through mechanism with each distribution customer.spot market, including ancillary services. Additionally, AES Chivor receives reliability payments for maintaining the plant's availability and generating firm energy during periods of power scarcity, such as adverse hydrological conditions, in order to prevent power shortages.
Key Financial Drivers Hedge levels at AES Gener limit volatility Hydrological conditions largely influence Chivor's power generation. Maintaining the appropriate contract level, while maximizing revenue through the sale of excess generation, is key to the underlying financial drivers.Chivor's results of operations. In addition to hydrology, financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Dry hydrology scenariosforced outages;
Forced outages
Changes in current regulatory rulings altering the ability to pass through or recover certain costs
Fluctuationsfluctuations of the Chilean peso (our hedging strategy reduces this risk, but some residual risk remains)Colombian peso; and
Tax policy changesspot market prices.
Legislation promoting renewable energy and strengthening regulations on thermal generation assets
Market price risk when re-contracting
Construction and Development — AES Gener continues to advance the construction of the 531 MW Alto Maipo run-of-the-river hydroelectric plant. Alto Maipo is the largest project in construction in the SIC market. When completed, it will include 74 km of tunnel works, two caverns, 17 km of transmission lines as part of the construction, and is 90% underground. Alto Maipo has two main contractors and covers three adjacent valleys in the Chilean Andes. The project currently employs approximately 4,500 people. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Alto Maipo.
Colombia
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Electricity supply in Colombia is concentrated in one main system, the SIN, which encompasses one-third of Colombia's territory, providing electricity to 97% of the country's population. The SIN's installed capacity, primarily hydroelectric (70%(69%) and thermal (29%(31%), totaled 16,78217,473 MW as of


29 | 2020 Annual Report

December 31, 2017.2020. The marked seasonal variations in Colombia's hydrology result in price volatility in the short-term market. In 2017, 87%2020, 72% of total energy demand was supplied by hydroelectric plants.
The electricity sector in Colombia operates under a competitive market framework for the generation and sale of electricity, and a regulated framework for transmission and distribution.distribution of electricity. The distinct activities of the electricity sector are governed by Colombian laws and CREG, the CREG.Colombian regulating entity for energy and gas. Other government entities have a role in the electricity industry, including the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which defines the government's policy for the energy sector; the Public Utility Superintendency of Colombia, which is in charge of overseeing utility companies; and the Mining and EnergeticEnergy Planning Unit, which is in charge of expansion of the generation and transmission network.
The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis with companies selling their generation in the wholesale market at the short-term price or under bilateral contracts with other participants, including distribution companies, generators and traders, and unregulated customers at freely negotiated prices. The National Dispatch Center dispatches generators in merit order based on bid offers in order to ensure that demand will be satisfied by the lowest cost combination of available generating units.

Development Strategy — AES Colombia is committed to transform into a renewable growth platform by supporting its customers to diversify their energy supply and become more competitive. As part of this commitment, AES Colombia is developing a pipeline of 1.3 GW of solar and wind projects. Five projects (648 MW) of wind energy are located in La Guajira, one of the windiest spots on Earth, and two projects (255 MW) were awarded a 15-year PPA at the last renewable auction. One project (99 MW) of the Wind Cluster has Environmental License and the others are progressing smoothly in their development process. During 2020, AES Colombia was awarded the 61 MW San Fernando Solar project through a 15-year PPA with Ecopetrol and started construction in September. This solar project, along with the 21 MW Castilla project built in 2019 also with a PPA with Ecopetrol, has been fundamental in leading the renewable market in Colombia.

Argentina
The Colombian governmentBusiness Description — AES operates plants in Argentina totaling 4,220 MW, representing 10% of the country's total installed capacity. AES owns a diversified generation portfolio in Argentina in terms of geography, technology, and regulatory entity carried out various studiesfuel source. AES Argentina's plants are placed in strategic locations within the country in order to improve the market. As a result, resolutions were issued in 2017 capping spot prices to reflect the true value of thermal plants; allowing small scale self-generation and distributed generation the option to sell excessprovide energy to the grid;spot market and a proposal to change the methodology for determining capacity payments for existing plants based on a new auction with the objectivecustomers, making use of reducing the reliability charges.
Business Description — We operate in Colombia through AES Chivor, a subsidiary of AES Gener, which owns a hydroelectric plant with an installed capacity of 1,000 MW,wind, hydro, and Tunjita, a 20 MW run-of-river hydroelectric, both located approximately 160 km east of Bogota. AES Chivor’s installed capacity accounted for approximately 6% of system capacity by the end of 2017. AES Chivor is dependent on hydrological conditions, which influence generation and spot prices of non-contracted generation in Colombia.thermal plants.
AES Chivor's commercial strategy aims to reduce margin volatilityprimarily sells its energy in the wholesale electricity market where prices are largely regulated. In 2020, approximately 90% of the energy was sold in the wholesale electricity market and 10% was sold under contract sales made by selling a significant portion of expected generation by bidding in public auctions for one to three year contracts, mainly with distribution companies. The remaining generation is sold on the spot market to other generationTermoAndes, Vientos Neuquinos, and trading companies at the system marginal cost. Additionally, AES Chivor receives reliability payments to maintain plant availability during periods ofVientos Bonaerenses power scarcity, such as adverse hydrological conditions, in order to prevent power shortages.plants.
Key Financial Drivers Hydrological conditions largely influence Chivor's generation abilities. Maintaining the appropriate contract level, while maximizing revenue through the sale of excess generation, is key to Chivor's results of operations. Hedge levels at Chivor limit volatility in the underlying financial drivers. In addition to hydrology, financialFinancial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Forced outagesforced outages;
Fluctuationsexposure to fluctuations of the Colombian pesoArgentine peso;
Exposure to the spot marketchanges in hydrology and wind resources;
Argentina
timely collection of FONINVEMEM installments and outstanding receivables (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below); and
natural gas prices and availability for contracted generation at Termoandes.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Argentina has one main power system, the SADI, which serves 96% of the country. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the installed capacity of the SADI totaled 36,50541,991 MW. The SADI's installed capacity is composed primarily of thermoelectric generation (63%(61%) and hydroelectric generation (32%(27%), as well as wind (6%), nuclear (4%), and solar (2%).
Thermoelectric generation in the SADI is primarily natural gas. However, scarcity of natural gas shortages induring winter periods (June to August), lead due to transport constraints result in the use of alternative fuels, such as oil and coal. The SADI is also highly reliant on hydroelectric plants. Hydrological conditions impact reservoir water levels and largely influence the dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants and, therefore, influence spot market prices.costs. Precipitation in Argentina occurs principally in the southern cone mostly from June to August.
Regulatory Framework The Argentine regulatory framework divides the electricity sector into generation, transmission, and distribution. The wholesale electric market is made upcomprised of generation companies, transmission companies, distribution companies, and large customers who are permitted to trade electricity. Generation companies can sell


30 | 2020 Annual Report

their output in the spot market or under PPAs. CAMMESA manages the electricity market and is responsible for dispatch coordination. The Electricity National Regulatory Agency is in charge of regulating public service activities and the MinistrySecretariat of Energy and Mining, through the Energy Secretariat, regulates system framework and grants concessions or authorizations for sector activities. In Argentina, there is a tolling scheme in which the regulator establishes the prices for electricity and defines fuel and adjusts them periodically for inflation, changes in fuel prices and other factors. In these cases,reference prices. As a result, our businesses are particularly sensitive to changes in regulation.
The Argentine electric market is an "average cost" system, with generators beingsystem. Generators are compensated for fixed costs and non-fuel variable costs, plus a rateunder prices denominated in Argentine pesos. CAMMESA is in charge of return. All fuels, except coal, are to be provided by CAMMESA. Thermoelectricproviding the natural gas plants, such as TermoAndes, are not subject to CAMMESA fuel purchases and are able to purchase gas directly fromliquid fuels required by the producers.generation companies, except for coal.
Argentina’s new administration continues introducing regulatory improvements with the intention to normalize the energy sector. Among others, Resolution 19/2017 was enacted to set higher tariffs, denominated in USD, for energy and capacity prices. The Resolution also ceased non-cash retention of margins. Likewise, long term USD denominated PPAs have been awarded to develop 9.4 GW of new capacity (thermal and renewable) through the execution of competitive auctions. During 2017,2020, the government has continuedmaintained prices to the end user, increasing residentialsubsidies and industrial tariffs in order to reduce the system deficit aiming to have all subsidies removed bydeficit. By December 2020, distribution companies recovered an average 55% of the endtotal cost of 2019.the system.
AES Argentina has contributed certain accounts receivable to fund the construction of new power plants under FONINVEMEM agreements. These receivables accrue interest and arehave been collected in monthly installments over 10


years onceafter commercial operation date of the related plants begin to operate.plant took place. AES Argentina hasparticipated in the construction of three FONINVEMEM funds related to operationalpower plants under which payments are being received.the FONINVEMEM structure, and in addition to the repayment of the accounts receivable contributed, AES Argentina will receive a pro rata ownership interest in each of these plants once the accounts receivables have been fully repaid. FONINVEMEM I and II installments were fully repaid in the first quarter of 2020 and the ownership interests in Termoeléctrica San Martín and Termoeléctrica Manuel Belgrano power plants are subject to agreement between the government and all generators that participated in the funds. FONINVEMEM III installments, related to Termoeléctrica Guillermo Brown which commenced operations in April 2016, are still being collected. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity—Long-Term Receivables and Note 6.7.Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-Kfor further discussion of receivables in Argentina.
In 2019 and 2020, the Argentine peso devalued against the USD by approximately 37% and 29%, respectively, and Argentina’s economy continued to be highly inflationary. Since September 2019, currency controls have been established to govern the devaluation of the Argentine peso and keep Argentine central bank reserves at acceptable levels for the next government of Argentina.
Development Strategy — Currently, 800 MW of renewable greenfield projects are in early and mid stages of development. These projects could be used to participate in future private PPAs or public auctions. In addition, "behind the meter” and off-grid solutions are being developed for the industrial sector (mining), including solar power plants plus BESS.
Brazil
Business Description AES Brasil (the business formerly branded as AES Tietê) has a portfolio of 12 hydroelectric power plants in the state of São Paulo with total installed capacity of 2,658 MW. These hydroelectric plants operate under a 30-year concession expiring in 2029.
Over the past three years, AES Brasil acquired and developed two solar power complexes in the state of São Paulo, which are fully contracted with 20-year PPAs and together account for 294 MW of installed capacity. AES Brasil represents approximately 12% of the total generation capacity in the state of São Paulo.
AES Brasil also owns Alto Sertão II, a wind complex located in the state of Bahia with an installed capacity of 386 MW and subject to 20-year PPAs expiring between 2033 and 2035, and in December 2020, also acquired the Ventus wind complex located in the State of Rio Grande do Norte with an installed capacity of 187 MW and subject to a 20-year PPA expiring in 2032.
In the second half of 2020, AES acquired an additional 19.8% ownership in AES Brasil. As of December 31, 2017,2020, AES Argentina operates 4,104 MW, representing 11% of the country's total installed capacity. The installed capacity in the SADI includes the TermoAndes plant, a subsidiaryowns 44% of AES Gener, whichBrasil and is connected both to the SADIcontrolling shareholder and the Chilean SING markets. AES Argentina has a diversified generation portfolio.
AES Argentina primarily sells its energy in the wholesale electric market where prices are largely regulated. In 2017, approximately 93% of the energy was sold in the wholesale electric marketmanages and 7% was sold under contract, asconsolidates this business. As a result of contract sales made by TermoAndes.
All thermoelectric facilities not subject to fuel procurement from CAMMESA, including the portion of TermoAndes planttransaction, AES has also committed to Energy Plus contracts, are able to use natural gas and receive gas supplied from Argentine sources. In recent years, gas supply restrictions in Argentina, particularly during the winter season, have affected the operation of certain plants, such as the TermoAndes plant.
Since December 2015, foreign currency controls were lifted, allowing the Argentine peso to float under the administration of Argentinian Central Bank. Over the course of 2017, the Argentine peso devalued by approximately 17%.
Tax Regulation — On December 29, 2017, Law 27430 was enacted in Argentina, which introduced a tax reform with several changes in the Argentine tax system, to be effective on January 1, 2018. This tax reform will reduce the statutory corporate tax rate of companies from 35% to 30% in 2018 and 2019, and 25% from 2020 onward. The law also eliminates the Equalization Tax on the distribution of earnings generated after January 1, 2018. The Equalization Tax is to be replaced with a withholding tax on dividends at the rate of 7% for 2018 and 2019, and 13% from 2020 onward.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Forced outages
Exposure to fluctuations of the Argentine peso
Changes in hydrology
Timely collection of FONINVEMEM installment and outstanding receivables (See Note 6.—Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further discussion)
Gas prices for contracted generation (Energy Plus)
Brazil SBU
Our Brazil SBU operates three generation businesses. Tietê is a publicly listed company in Brazil. AES controls and consolidates Tietê through its 24% economic interest.
Generation — Operating installed capacity of our three generation businesses totals 3,684 MW. The following table lists our Brazil SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)
Tietê (1)
 Brazil Hydro 2,658
 24% 1999 2029 Various
Alto Sertão II Brazil Wind 386
 24% 2017 2033-2035  
Tietê Subtotal     3,044
        
Uruguaiana Brazil Gas 640
 46% 2000 
 
      3,684
        
_____________________________
(1)
Tietê plants: Água Vermelha (1,396 MW), Bariri (143 MW), Barra Bonita (141 MW), Caconde (80 MW), Euclides da Cunha (109 MW), Ibitinga (132 MW), Limoeiro (32 MW), Mogi-Guaçu (7 MW), Nova Avanhandava (347 MW), Promissão (264 MW), Sao Joaquim (3 MW) and Sao Jose (4 MW).


The following map illustrates the location of our Brazil facilities:
Brazil Businesses
Brazil Utility
Business Description — Eletropaulo distributes electricity to the greater São Paulo area, Brazil's main economic and financial center. Eletropaulo holds a 30-year concession that expires in 2028. AES owns 17% of the economic interest in Eletropaulo. In November 2017, Eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitionedtransition the listing of thoseAES Brasil's shares intoto the Novo Mercado, which is a listing segment of the Brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance. Upon conversionThe transition to Novo Mercado is expected to occur in the first half of 2021.
In December 2020, AES Brasil entered into an agreement for the acquisition of the preferred shares into ordinary shares, MS Wind and Santos Wind Complexes, located in the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará, respectively. The complexes have been


31 | 2020 Annual Report

operational since 2013 with 159 MW of installed capacity, fully sold in the regulated market for 20 years.
AES no longer controlled EletropauloBrasil aims to contract most of its physical guarantee requirements and accounted for its ownership interestsell the remaining portion in the spot market. The commercial strategy is reassessed periodically according to changes in market conditions, hydrology, and other factors. AES Brasil generally sells available energy through medium-term bilateral contracts.
Key Financial Drivers — The electricity market in Brazil is highly dependent on hydroelectric generation, therefore electricity pricing is driven by hydrology. Plant availability is also a significant financial driver as an equity method investment. In December 2017, allin times of high hydrology, AES is more exposed to the criteria were met for Eletropaulo to be classified as a discontinued operation.spot market. AES Brasil's financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Brazil Generation
hydrology, impacting quantity of energy generated in the MRE (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below for further information);
growth in demand for energy;
market price risk when re-contracting;
asset management;
cost management; and
ability to execute on its growth strategy.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — In Brazil, the Ministry of Mines and Energy determines the maximum amount of energy a generation plant can sell, called a physical guarantee, representing the long-term average expected energy production of the plant. Under current rules, physical guarantee energy can be sold to distribution companies through long-term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies.
The ONSBrazil has installed capacity of 176 GW, composed of hydroelectric (62%), thermoelectric (25%), renewable (12%), and nuclear (1%) sources. Operation is responsible for managing the operation ofcentralized and controlled by the national grid.operator, ONS, and regulated by the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency ("ANEEL"). The ONS dispatches generators based on their marginal cost of production and on the risk of system rationing. Key variables for the dispatch decision are forecasted hydrological conditions, reservoir levels, electricity demand, fuel prices, and thermal generation availability.
In case of unfavorable hydrology, the ONS will reduce hydroelectric dispatch to preserve reservoir levels and increase dispatch of thermal plants to meet demand. The consequences of unfavorable hydrology are (i) higher energy spot prices due to higher energy production costs by thermal plants become more expensive to dispatch in the system,and (ii) the need for hydro plants to purchase energy in the spot market to fulfill their contractual obligations and (iii) high spot prices. Given the importance of hydro generation in the country, the ONS sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to maintain reservoir levels in the system.


obligations.
A mechanism known as the MRE was created under ONS to share hydrological risk across MRE hydro generators.generators by using a generation scaling factor ("GSF") to adjust generators' physical guarantee during periods of hydrological scarcity. If the hydro plants generate less than the total MRE physical guarantee, the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market. When total hydro generation is higher than the total MRE physical guarantee, the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they may sell the excess energy on the spot market.
BrazilIn September 2020, Law 14.052/2020 published by ANEEL was approved by the President, establishing terms for compensation to MRE hydro generators for the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 to 2018, which resulted in higher charges assessed to MRE hydro generators by the regulator. Under the law, potential compensation will be in the form of an offer for a concession extension for each hydro generator in exchange for full payment of billed GSF trade payables, the amount of which will be reduced in conjunction with the payment for a concession extension. See Key Trends and UncertaintiesRegulatory in Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-K.
Development Strategy — AES Brasil's strategy is to grow by adding renewable capacity to its generation platform through acquisition or greenfield projects, to focus on client satisfaction and innovation to offer new products and energy solutions, and to be recognized for excellence in asset management.
In 2020, AES Brasil acquired the Tucano Project, a 582 MW greenfield wind power project in the state of Bahia, for which construction is scheduled to start in 2021 and when completed, will supply long-term PPAs. The first phase (155 MW) will be developed in 2021 through a joint venture with Unipar Carbocloro for a 20-year PPA starting in 2022. The second phase (167 MW) will be 100% developed by AES Brasil in 2021, for a 15-year PPA with Anglo American starting in 2022. AES Brasil is seeking other long-term PPAs to fulfill the remaining 260 MW.


32 | 2020 Annual Report

In March 2020, AES Brasil signed two purchase option agreements for a total installed capacity up to 1,100 MW of Cajuína greenfield wind power project in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, which are being exercised as the company secures long-term PPAs. In August 2020, AES Brasil signed a Shareholder Purchase Agreement ("SPA") for the first phase, Santa Tereza, which has installed capacity of 156,436 MW, which420 MW. Closing is primarily hydroelectric (64%) and thermal (17%).
Business Description — Tietê has a portfolio of 12 hydroelectric power plantsexpected to occur in the statefirst quarter of 2021. A Memorandum of Understanding was signed with Ferbasa for 80 MW energy supply over a period of 20 years, beginning in 2024. The SPA for the second phase, São Paulo with totalRicardo, which has installed capacity of 2,658 MW. Tietê represents approximately 10% of437 MW, was signed in February 2021. AES Brasil is seeking other long-term PPAs to fulfill the total generation capacityremaining 777 MW in the state of São Paulo. Tietê operates under a 30-year concession expiring in 2029. AES owns 24% of Tietêphases 1 and is the controlling shareholder and manages and consolidates this business. Tietê's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee requirements and sell the remaining portion in the spot market. The commercial strategy is reassessed periodically according to changes in market conditions, hydrology and other factors. Tietê generally sells available energy through medium-term bilateral contracts.2.
Under the current terms of the 2018 legal agreement in connection with AES Brasil's concession agreement, Tietêwith the state government, AES Brasil is required to increase its capacity in the state of São Paulo by 15% (or 400 MW). In 2017, Tietê acquired two solar plants and was successful in a bid to develop a third solar project in the state of São Paulo, totaling 75% of the obligation. These assets are not subject to return at the end of the concession. Also in 2017, Tietê acquired Alto Sertão II Wind Complex (“Alto Sertão II”) located in the state of Bahia, with an installed capacity of 386 MW. Alto Sertão II is subject to 20-year PPAs expiring between 2033 and 2035. Through its ownership of Tietê, AES owns a 24% economic interest in Alto Sertão II.additional 81 MW by October 2024.
Uruguaiana is a 640 MW gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of Uruguaiana in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. AES manages and has a 46% economic interest in the plant. The plant's operations have been largely suspended due to the unavailability of gas. The plant operated for short periods of time in 2013, 2014 and 2015 when short-term supply of LNG was sourced for the facility. The plant did not operate in 2016 or 2017. AES has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to Uruguaiana. One of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the Argentinean pipeline, especially during the winter season when gas demand in Argentina is very high. Uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis.

Key Financial Drivers — As the system is highly dependent on hydroelectric generation, electricity pricing is driven by hydrology in Brazil. Plant availability is also a significant financial driver as in times of high hydrology AES is more exposed to the spot market. The availability of gas is also a driver for continued operations at Uruguaiana. Tietê's financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:

33 | 2020 Annual Report
Hydrology, impacting quantity of energy generated in MRE
Demand growthaes-20201231_g9.jpg
Re-contracting price
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.
Asset management and plant availability
Cost management


34 | 2020 Annual Report
Ability to execute on its growth strategy
Construction and Development — As part of the initiative to pursue opportunities in renewable generation, Tietê has invested in three special purpose entities slated to construct photovoltaic power plants with a total projected capacity of 91 MW, subject to 20-year PPAs. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2018.
MCAC SBUPuerto Rico
Our MCAC SBU hasBusiness Description — AES Puerto Rico owns and operates a portfoliocoal-fired cogeneration plant and a solar plant of distribution businesses and generation facilities, including renewable energy, in five countries, with a total capacity of 3,381524 MW and distribution networks serving 1.4 million customers as24 MW, respectively, representing approximately 8% of December 31, 2017.the installed capacity in Puerto Rico. Both plants are fully contracted through long-term PPAs with PREPA expiring in 2027 and 2032, respectively. AES Puerto Rico receives a capacity payment based on the plants' twelve month rolling average availability, receiving the full payment when the availability is 90% or higher. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Puerto Rico for further discussion of the long-term PPAs with PREPA.

Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to, improved operational performance and plant availability.

Generation — The following table lists our MCAC SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)
DPP (Los Mina) Dominican Republic Gas 358
 85% 1996 2022 CDEEE
Andres Dominican Republic Gas 319
 85% 2003 2022 Ede Norte/Ede Este/Ede Sur/Non-Regulated Users
Itabo (1) 
 Dominican Republic Coal 295
 43% 2000 2022 Ede Norte/Ede Este/Ede Sur
Andres ES Dominican Republic Energy Storage 10
 85% 2017    
Los Mina DPP ES Dominican Republic Energy Storage 10
 85% 2017    
Dominican Republic Subtotal     992
        
AES Nejapa El Salvador Landfill Gas 6
 100% 2011 2035 CAESS
Moncagua El Salvador Solar 3
 100% 2015 2035 EEO
El Salvador Subtotal     9
        
Merida III Mexico Gas 505
 75% 2000 2025 Comision Federal de Electricidad
Termoelectrica del Golfo (TEG) Mexico Pet Coke 275
 99% 2007 2027 CEMEX
Termoelectrica del Penoles (TEP) Mexico Pet Coke 275
 99% 2007 2027 Penoles
Mexico Subtotal     1,055
        
Bayano Panama Hydro 260
 49% 1999 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/Other
Changuinola Panama Hydro 223
 90% 2011 2030 AES Panama
Chiriqui-Esti Panama Hydro 120
 49% 2003 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/Other
Estrella de Mar I Panama Heavy Fuel Oil 72
 49% 2015 2020 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/Other
Chiriqui-Los Valles Panama Hydro 54
 49% 1999 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/Other
Chiriqui-La Estrella Panama Hydro 48
 49% 1999 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/Other
Panama Subtotal     777
        
Puerto Rico US-PR Coal 524
 100% 2002 2027 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Ilumina US-PR Solar 24
 100% 2012 2032 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Puerto Rico Subtotal     548
        
      3,381
        
_____________________________
(1)
Itabo plants: Itabo complex (two coal-fired steam turbines and one gas-fired steam turbine).
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the MCAC SBU:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
Bosforo El Salvador Solar 30
 100% 1H-2H 2018
Colón Panama Gas 380
 50% 2H 2018
      410
    
Utilities — Our distribution businesses are located in El Salvador and distribute power to 1.4 million people in the country. These businesses consist of four companies, each of which operates in defined service areas. The following table lists our MCAC utilities:
Business Location Approximate Number of Customers Served as of 12/31/2017 GWh Sold in 2017 AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation
CAESS El Salvador 599,000
 2,213
 75% 2000
CLESA El Salvador 398,000
 898
 80% 1998
DEUSEM El Salvador 80,000
 133
 74% 2000
EEO El Salvador 307,000
 577
 89% 2000
    1,384,000
 3,821
    


The following map illustrates the location of our MCAC facilities:
MCAC Businesses
Dominican Republic
Regulatory Framework and Market StructurePuerto Rico has a single electric grid managed by PREPA, a state-owned entity that provides virtually all of the electric power consumed in Puerto Rico and generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to 1.5 million customers. The Dominican Republic energy marketPuerto Rico Energy Bureau is a decentralized industry consisting of generation, transmissionthe main regulatory body. The bureau approves wholesale and distribution businesses. Generation companies can earn revenue through short-retail rates, sets efficiency and long-term PPAs, ancillary services,interconnection standards, and a competitive wholesale generation market. All generation, transmission and distribution companies are subject to and regulated by the General Electricity Law.
Two main agencies are responsible for monitoringoversees PREPA's compliance with Puerto Rico's renewable portfolio standard.
Puerto Rico's electricity is 97% produced by thermal plants (43% from natural gas, 36% from petroleum, and 18% from coal).
AES Clean Energy
Business Description — AES manages the General Electricity Law:U.S. renewables portfolio, which comprises AES Distributed Energy, sPower and other renewable assets, as part of its broader investments in the U.S. On January 4, 2021, the sPower and AES Distributed Energy development platforms were merged to form AES Clean Energy Development, which will serve as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. sPower remains an AES unconsolidated affiliate after this merger. Collectively, AES Distributed Energy, sPower, AES Clean Energy Development, and the other renewable assets in the U.S. are referred to as AES Clean Energy.
The NationalPrior to the merger, both AES and sPower were recognized leaders in renewable development in the U.S. Together, AES Clean Energy Commission drafts and coordinates the legal framework and regulatory legislation. They propose and adopt policies and procedures to implement best practices, support the proper functioning and developmentis one of the top renewables growth platforms and the expanded team aims to solve our customers' energy sector,challenges. AES Clean Energy offers its customers an expanded portfolio of innovative solutions based on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to accelerate their energy futures. Generation capacity of the systems owned and/or operated under AES Clean Energy is 2,983 MW across the U.S. with another 299 MW under construction. This capacity includes 2,066 MW of solar, 1,085 MW of wind, and promote investment.131 MW of energy storage.
The SuperintendenceA majority of Electricity's main responsibilities include monitoring compliancesolar projects under AES Clean Energy have been financed with legaltax equity structures. Under these tax equity structures, the tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. Based on certain liquidation provisions rules, and technical procedures governing generation, transmission, distribution and commercialization of electricity. In addition, they monitor behaviorthe tax equity structures, this could result in the electric market in ordervariability to avoid monopolistic practices. In additionearnings attributable to AES compared to the two agencies responsible for monitoring compliance withearnings reported at the General Electricity Law, the Industrial and Commerce Ministry supervises commercial and industrial activities in the Dominican Republic as well as the fuels and natural gas commercialization to the end users.facilities.
The Dominican Republic has one main interconnected system with approximately 3,692 MW of installed capacity, composed primarily of thermal (79%), hydroelectric (17%) and wind (4%) generation plants/farms.
Business Description — AES Dominicana consists of three operating subsidiaries, Itabo, Andres and Los Mina. With a total of 992 MW of installed capacity, AES has 26% of the system capacity and supplies approximately 46% of energy demand via these generation facilities. AES has a strategic partnership with the Estrella and Linda Groups ("Estrella-Linda"), a consortium of two leading Dominican industrial groups that manage a diversified business portfolio.
Itabo is 42.5% owned by AES. Itabo owns and operates two thermal power generation units with a total of 295 MW of installed capacity. Itabo's PPAs with government-owned distribution companies expired in July 2016. The


Dominican Corporation of State Electrical Companies sponsored a bidding process, which was awarded in April 2017 for a total of 196 MW of installed capacity and secured supply and competitive pricing for actual and future distribution energy requirements.
Andres and Los Mina are owned 85% by AES. Andres has a combined cycle natural gas turbine, an energy storage solution and generation capacity of 329 MW as well as the only LNG import facility in the country, with 160,000 cubic meters of storage capacity. Los Mina has a combined cycle with two natural gas turbines, an energy storage solution and generation capacity of 368 MW. Both Andres and Los Mina have in aggregate 697 MW of installed capacity, of which 625 MW is mostly contracted until 2022 with government-owned distribution companies and large customers.
AES Dominicana has a long-term LNG purchase contract through 2023 for 33.6 trillion btu/year with a price linked to NYMEX Henry Hub. The LNG contract terms allow delivery to various markets in Latin America. These plants capitalize on the competitively-priced LNG contract by selling power where the market is dominated by fuel oil-based generation. Andres has a long-term contract to sell re-gasified LNG to industrial users within the Dominican Republic using compression technology to transport it within the country thereby capturing demand from industrial and commercial customers.
Key Financial Drivers — The financial results of AES Clean Energy are primarily driven by the efficient construction and operation of renewable energy facilities across the U.S. under long-term PPAs, through which the energy price on the entire production of these facilities is guaranteed. The financial results of renewable assets are


21 | 2020 Annual Report

primarily driven by the amount of wind or solar resource at the facilities, availability of facilities, and growth in projects.
Laurel Mountain, Buffalo Gap II and Buffalo Gap III are exposed to the volatility of energy prices and their revenue may change materially as energy prices fluctuate in their respective markets of operations. Laurel Mountain also operates 16 MW of battery energy storage that is sold into the PJM market as regulation energy. For these projects, PJM and ERCOT power prices impact financial results.
Development Strategy — As states, communities, and organizations of all types make commitments and plan to reduce their carbon footprints, renewables are the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the U.S. AES Clean Energy works with its customers to co-create and deliver the smarter, greener energy solutions that meet their needs, including 24/7 carbon-free energy. The merged renewables platform has brought together sPower's and AES' differentiated capabilities in solar, wind, and energy storage to accelerate customers' energy transitions.
AES Clean Energy has a renewable project backlog that includes 2,206 MW of projects for which long-term PPAs have been signed or, as applicable, tariffs have been assigned through a regulatory process. The budget for construction of the projects currently under construction and the contracted projects is over $3.9 billion. AES Clean Energy is actively developing new products and renewable sites to serve the current and future needs of its customers.
U.S. Environmental Regulation
For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
El Salvador
Business Description — AES El Salvador is the majority owner of four of the five distribution companies operating in El Salvador (CAESS, CLESA, EEO and DEUSEM). AES El Salvador's territory covers 77% of the country and accounted for 3,640 GWh of the wholesale market energy sales during 2020. AES El Salvador is also a 50% owner and operator of Bosforo, a 100 MW solar farm. The energy produced by this solar farm is fully contracted by AES' utilities in El Salvador.
In addition, AES El Salvador offers customers non-regulated services such as energy trading, electromechanical construction, O&M of electrical assets, EPC, pole rental, and tax collection for municipalities.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Changesimproved operational performance;
variability in spotenergy demand driven by weather; and
the impact of fuel oil prices on energy tariff prices, which affect cash flow due to fluctuations in commodity prices, (since fuel is a pass-through cost under the PPAs, any variation in oil prices will impact the spot sales for both Andres and Itabo).
Contracting levels and the extent of capacity awarded.
Supply shortagesthree-month delay in the near term (next twopass-through of energy costs to three years) may provide opportunities for short term upside, but new generation is expectedthe tariffs charged to come online beginning 2018.customers.
Additional sales derived from domestic natural gas demand are expected to continue providing income and growth based on the entry of future projects and the fees from the infrastructure service.
El Salvador
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — El SalvadorSalvador's national electric market is composed of generation, distribution, transmission, and marketing businesses, as well as a market and system operator, and regulatory agencies. The operation of the transmission system and the wholesale market is based on production costs with a marginal economic model that rewards efficiency and allows investors to have guaranteed profits, while end users getreceive affordable rates. The energy sector is governed by the General Electricity Law, which definesestablishes two regulatory entities responsible for monitoring its compliance:
The National Energy Council is the highest authority on energy policy and strategy, and the coordinating body for the different energy sectors. One of its main objectives is to promote investment in non-conventional renewable sources to diversify the energy matrix.
The General Superintendence of Electricity and Telecommunications ("SIGET") regulates the market and sets consumer prices. SIGET,prices, and, jointly with the distribution companies in El Salvador, completed the tariff reset process in December 2017 and developed the tariff calculation applicable from 2018 until 2022. The next tariff calculation is scheduled for 2022, and will be effective starting in 2023.
El Salvador has a national electric grid whichthat interconnects directly with Guatemala and Honduras.Honduras, allowing transactions with all Central American countries. The sector has approximately 1,8821,799 MW of installed capacity, composed primarily of thermal (40%), hydroelectric (29%(31%), geothermalsolar (11%), biomass (13%(9%), solar (5%) and other renewable (2%geothermal (9%) generation plants/farms.plants.
Business Description Development Strategy In order to explore new business opportunities, AES El Salvador created AES


22 | 2020 Annual Report

Soluciones, an LED public lighting service provider and the main commercial and industrial solar photovoltaic EPC provider in the country. AES Next is also the O&M services provider for the Bosforo project.



23 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g7.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.


24 | 2020 Annual Report

South America SBU
Our South America SBU has generation facilities in four countries — Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Brazil. AES Gener is a publicly traded company in Chile and owns all of our assets in Chile, AES Chivor in Colombia and TermoAndes in Argentina, as detailed below. AES has a 66.7% ownership interest in AES Gener and this business is consolidated in our financial statements. AES Brasil (the business formerly branded as AES Tietê) is a publicly traded company in Brazil. AES controls and consolidates AES Brasil through its 44% economic interest.
Operating installed capacity of our South America SBU totals 12,304 MW, of which 34%, 29%, 8%, and 29% are located in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Brazil, respectively. The following table lists our South America SBU generation facilities:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
ChivorColombiaHydro1,000 67 %20002020-2037Various
CastillaColombiaSolar21 67 %20192034Ecopetrol
TunjitaColombiaHydro20 67 %2016
Colombia Subtotal1,041 
Gener - Chile (1)
ChileCoal/Hydro/Diesel/Solar/Wind/Biomass1,578 67 %20002020-2040Various
Guacolda (2)
ChileCoal764 33 %20002020-2032Various
Electrica AngamosChileCoal558 67 %20112021Minera Escondida, Minera Spence, Quebrada Blanca
CochraneChileCoal550 40 %20162030-2037SQM, Sierra Gorda, Quebrada Blanca
Cochrane ESChileEnergy Storage20 40 %2016
Electrica Angamos ESChileEnergy Storage20 67 %2011
Norgener ES (Los Andes)ChileEnergy Storage12 67 %2009
Alfalfal Virtual ReservoirChileEnergy Storage10 67 %2020
Chile Subtotal3,512 
TermoAndes (3)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel643 67 %20002020Various
AES Gener Subtotal5,196 
AlicuraArgentinaHydro1,050 100 %2000
Paraná-GTArgentinaGas/Diesel870 100 %2001
San NicolásArgentinaCoal/Gas/Oil/Energy Storage691 100 %1993
Guillermo Brown (4)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel576 — %2016
Cabra CorralArgentinaHydro102 100 %1995Various
Vientos BonaerensesArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
Vientos NeuquinosArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
UllumArgentinaHydro45 100 %1996Various
SarmientoArgentinaGas/Diesel33 100 %1996
El TunalArgentinaHydro10 100 %1995Various
Argentina Subtotal3,577 
Tietê (5)
BrazilHydro2,658 44 %19992029Various
Alto Sertão IIBrazilWind386 44 %20172033-2035Various
VentusBrazilWind187 44 %20202034Regulated Market
GuaimbêBrazilSolar150 44 %20182037CCEE
AGV SolarBrazilSolar75 44 %20192039Various
Boa HoraBrazilSolar69 44 %20192035CCEE
Drogaria AraujoBrazilSolar44 %20192029Drogaria Araujo
Brasil Community SolarBrazilSolar44 %2020
AES Brasil Subtotal3,531 
12,304 
_____________________________
(1)Gener - Chile plants: Alfalfal, Andes Solar, Andes Solar 2a, Laguna Verde, Laja, Los Cururos, Maitenes, Norgener 1, Norgener 2, Queltehues, Ventanas 2, Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4 and Volcán. In December 2020, AES Gener requested the retirement of Ventanas 1 and 2. Ventanas 1 initiated strategic reserve mode and Ventanas 2 is waiting for approval.
(2)Guacolda is comprised of five coal-fired units under Guacolda Energia S.A., an unconsolidated entity for which the results of operations are reflected in Net equity in earnings of affiliates. The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 34%.


25 | 2020 Annual Report

(3)TermoAndes is located in Argentina, but is connected to both the SEN in Chile and the SADI in Argentina.
(4)AES operates this facility through management or O&M agreements and to date owns no equity interest in the business.
(5)Tietê hydro plants: Água Vermelha, Bariri, Barra Bonita, Caconde, Euclides da Cunha, Ibitinga, Limoeiro, Mogi-Guaçu, Nova Avanhandava, Promissão, Sao Joaquim and Sao Jose.
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the South America SBU:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
Tucano Phase 2BrazilWind167 44 %2H 2022
Tucano Phase 1BrazilWind155 44 %2H 2022
McDonaldsBrazilSolar44 %1H 2021
Farmácias São JoãoBrazilSolar44 %1H 2021
AES Brasil Subtotal330 
Alto Maipo (1)
ChileHydro531 62 %2H 2021
Los OlmosChileWind110 67 %1H 2021
Campo LindoChileWind73 67 %1H 2021
MesamávidaChileWind68 67 %2H 2021
Andes Solar 2bChileSolar180 67 %2H 2021
Energy Storage112 
Chile Subtotal1,074 
San FernandoColombiaSolar59 67 %2H 2021
Colombia Subtotal59 
1,463 
_____________________________
(1)     Alto Maipo is the largest project in construction in the Chilean market. When completed, it will include 75 km of tunnels, two power houses and 17 km of transmission lines.

The majority owner of fourprojects under construction have executed mid- to long-term PPAs.
In June 2018, the Company completed the sale of the fiveits entire 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo, a distribution companies operatingbusiness in El Salvador (CAESS, CLESA, EEO and DEUSEM). AES El Salvador's territory covers 77% of the country andBrazil. Prior to its sale, Eletropaulo was accounted for 4,124 GWhas an equity method investment and its results of operations and financial position were reported as discontinued operations in the wholesale market energy purchases during 2017, or about 65% market share.consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
ConstructionIn September 2020, the Company completed the sale of its entire interest in AES Uruguaiana, a gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in Brazil.


26 | 2020 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our South America facilities:
South America Businesses
aes-20201231_g8.jpg
Chile
Business Description — In Chile, through AES Gener, we are engaged in the generation and Development — As partsupply of electricity (energy and capacity) in the initiative to pursue opportunities in renewable generation, AES El Salvador has entered into a joint venture with Corporacion Multi-Inversiones, a Guatemalan investment group, to develop, construct, and operate Bosforo, a 100 MW solar farm with an estimated cost of $158 million. 10 MW of the project are under construction and expected to become operational during the first half of 2018. The energy produced by this project will be contracted directly by AES' utilities in El Salvador.
Panama
SEN—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. AES Gener is the second largest generation operator in Chile in terms of installed capacity with 3,450 MW, excluding energy storage, and has a market share of approximately 13% as of December 31, 2020.
AES Gener owns a diversified generation portfolio in Chile in terms of geography, technology, customers, and energy resources. AES Gener's generation plants are located near the principal electricity consumption centers, including Santiago, Valparaiso, and Antofagasta. AES Gener's diverse generation portfolio provides flexibility for the management of contractual obligations with regulated and unregulated customers, provides backup energy to the spot market and facilitates operations under a variety of market and hydrological conditions.
AES Gener's Green Blend and Extend strategy aims to reduce carbon intensity and incorporate renewable energy to extend our existing conventional PPAs. This strategy de-links our PPAs from legacy fossil resources, grows our renewable energy portfolio, and delivers a competitive, reliable energy solution. In line with the "green blend and extend" strategy, AES Gener has committed to not build additional coal-based power plants and to advance the development of new renewable projects, including the implementation of battery energy storage systems ("BESS") and other technological innovations that will provide greater flexibility and reliability to the system.
AES Gener currently has long-term contracts, with an average remaining term of approximately 9 years, with regulated distribution companies and unregulated customers, such as mining and industrial companies. In general,


27 | 2020 Annual Report

these long-term contracts include pass-through mechanisms for fuel costs along with price indexations to U.S. Consumer Price Index ("CPI").
In addition to energy payments, AES Gener also receives capacity payments to compensate for availability during periods of peak demand. The grid operator, Coordinador Electrico Nacional ("CEN"), annually determines the capacity requirements for each power plant. The capacity price is fixed semiannually by the National Energy Commission and indexed to the CPI and other relevant indices.
Key Financial Drivers Hedge strategy at AES Gener limits volatility to the underlying financial drivers. In addition, financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
dry hydrology scenarios;
forced outages;
changes in current regulatory rulings altering the ability to pass through or recover certain costs;
fluctuations of the Chilean peso;
tax policy changes;
legislation promoting renewable energy and/or more restrictive regulations on thermal generation assets; and
market price risk when re-contracting.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Panamanian power sectorChilean electricity industry is composed ofdivided into three distinct operating business units:segments: generation, distributiontransmission, and transmission. Generators can enter into long-term PPAs with distributors or unregulated consumers. In addition,distribution. Private companies operate in all three segments, and generators can enter into alternativePPAs to sell energy to regulated and unregulated customers, as well as to other generators in the spot market.
Chile operates in a single power market, referred to as the SEN, which is managed by the grid operator CEN. The SEN has an installed capacity of 26,056 MW, and represents 99% of the installed generation capacity of the country.
CEN coordinates all generation and transmission companies in the SEN. CEN minimizes the operating costs of the electricity system, while maximizing service quality and reliability requirements. CEN dispatches plants in merit order based on their variable cost of production, allowing for electricity to be supplied at the lowest available cost. In the south-central region of the SEN, thermoelectric generation is required to fulfill demand not satisfied by hydroelectric, solar, and wind output and is critical to provide reliable and dependable electricity supply under dry hydrological conditions in the highest demand area of the SEN. In the northern region of the SEN, which includes the Atacama Desert, thermoelectric capacity represents the majority of installed capacity. The fuels used for thermoelectric generation, mainly coal, diesel, and LNG, are indexed to international prices. In 2020, the installed generation capacity in the Chilean market was composed of 48% thermoelectric, 27% hydroelectric, 13% solar, 10% wind, and 2% other fuel sources.
Hydroelectric plants represent a significant portion of the system's installed capacity. Precipitation and snow melt impact hydrological conditions in Chile. Rain occurs principally from June to August and snow melt occurs from September to December. These factors affect dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants, thereby influencing spot market prices.
The Ministry of Energy has primary responsibility for the Chilean electricity system directly or through the National Energy Commission and the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels.
All generators can sell energy through contracts with regulated distribution companies or directly to unregulated customers. Unregulated customers are customers whose connected capacity is higher than 5 MW. Customers with connected capacity between 0.5 MW and 5.0 MW can opt for regulated or unregulated contracts for a minimum period of four years. By law, both regulated and unregulated customers are required to purchase all electricity under contracts. Generators may also sell energy to other power generation companies on a short-term basis at negotiated prices outside the spot market. Electricity prices in Chile are denominated in USD, although payments are made in Chilean pesos.
The Chilean government’s decarbonization plan includes the complete retirement of the SEN coal fleet by the end of 2040 and carbon neutrality by 2050. During the year, AES Gener announced its commitment to shut down its Ventanas 1 coal-fired plant in 2020 and its Ventanas 2 coal-fired plant in June 2022 or earlier, pending resolution of current transmission constraints, and to disconnect both plants from the SEN in 2025. On December 26, 2020, the


28 | 2020 Annual Report

Ministry of Energy’s Supreme Decree Number 42 went into effect, allowing coal plants to enter into Strategic Reserve Status (“SRS”) and receive 60% of capacity payments for the 5-year period following its shutdown to remain connected as a backup in case of a system emergency. Following the issuance of this regulation and per the disconnection and termination agreement signed with the Chilean government in June 2019, the Ventanas 1 power plant was shut down on December 29, 2020 to enter into SRS.
Environmental Regulation — In March 2019, a new decontamination plan for the Ventanas region was approved. We are currently implementing the requirements defined by the plan which will impact our Ventanas and Guacolda businesses.
Chilean law requires all electricity generators to supply a certain portion of their total contractual obligations with non-conventional renewable energy ("NCREs"). Generation companies are able to meet this requirement by building NCRE generation capacity (wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and small hydroelectric technology) or purchasing NCREs from qualified generators. Non-compliance with the NCRE requirements will result in fines. AES Gener currently fulfills the NCRE requirements by utilizing AES Gener's solar and biomass power plants and by purchasing NCREs from other generation companies. At present, AES Gener is in the process of negotiating additional NCRE supply contracts to meet future requirements.
Since 2017, emissions of particulate matter, SO2, NOX, and CO2 are monitored for plants with eachan installed capacity over 50 MW; these emissions are taxed. In the case of CO2, the tax is equivalent to $5 per ton emitted. Certain PPAs have clauses allowing the Company to pass the green tax costs to unregulated customers, while some distribution PPAs do not allow for the pass through of these costs.


other. OutsideDevelopment Strategy — AES Gener is committed to reducing the coal intensity of the PPAChilean power grid and plans to increase the renewable energy capacity in its portfolio. As part of this commitment, and in addition to the 531 MW hydroelectric generation that Alto Maipo will deliver to the system, AES Gener purchased the 110 MW Los Cururos wind farm and its substation in northern Chile, and has finished construction on the 80 MW Andes 2a facility. Also under construction are the 110 MW Los Olmos wind farm, 66 MW Mesamávida wind farm, 73 MW Campo Lindo wind farm, and 180 MW Andes Solar 2b facility, which also includes 112 MW of BESS, to supply agreements with its main mining customers in execution of the new Green Blend and Extend strategy. In total, the pipeline currently has 4.4 GW under development at different stages and diversified geographically.
AES Gener executes its Green Blend and Extend strategy by integrating renewable energy sources into its portfolio, and by providing contracting options that contain a mix of both renewable and nonrenewable solutions.
Colombia
Business Description — We operate in Colombia through AES Chivor, a subsidiary of AES Gener, which owns a hydroelectric plant with an installed capacity of 1,000 MW and Tunjita, a 20 MW run-of-river hydroelectric plant, both located approximately 160 km east of Bogota, as well as Castilla, a 21 MW solar facility. AES Chivor’s installed capacity accounted for approximately 6% of system capacity at the end of 2020. AES Chivor is dependent on hydrological conditions, which influence generation and spot prices of non-contracted generation in Colombia.
AES Chivor's commercial strategy aims to execute contracts with commercial and industrial customers and bid in public tenders, mainly with distribution companies, in order to reduce margin volatility with proper portfolio risk management. The remaining energy generated by our portfolio is sold to the spot market, generators may buyincluding ancillary services. Additionally, AES Chivor receives reliability payments for maintaining the plant's availability and sellgenerating firm energy during periods of power scarcity, such as adverse hydrological conditions, in order to prevent power shortages.
Key Financial Drivers — Hydrological conditions largely influence Chivor's power generation. Maintaining the appropriate contract level, while maximizing revenue through the sale of excess generation, is key to Chivor's results of operations. In addition to hydrology, financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
forced outages;
fluctuations of the Colombian peso; and
spot market prices.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Electricity supply in Colombia is concentrated in one main system, the SIN, which encompasses one-third of Colombia's territory, providing electricity to 97% of the country's population. The SIN's installed capacity, primarily hydroelectric (69%) and thermal (31%), totaled 17,473 MW as of


29 | 2020 Annual Report

December 31, 2020. The marked seasonal variations in Colombia's hydrology result in price volatility in the short-term market. Generators can only contract up to their firm capacity.
Three main agencies are responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law:In 2020, 72% of total energy demand was supplied by hydroelectric plants.
The SNE has the responsibilities of planning, supervising and controlling policies of the energyelectricity sector within Panama. With these responsibilities, the SNE proposes laws and regulations to the executive agencies that regulate the procurement of energy and hydrocarbonsin Colombia operates under a competitive market framework for the country.
The regulatorgeneration and sale of public services, known as the ASEP, is an autonomous agency of the government. ASEP is responsibleelectricity, and a regulated framework for the control and oversight of public services, including electricity, the transmission and distribution of natural gas utilities,electricity. The distinct activities of the electricity sector are governed by Colombian laws and CREG, the Colombian regulating entity for energy and gas. Other government entities have a role in the electricity industry, including the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which defines the government's policy for the energy sector; the Public Utility Superintendency of Colombia, which is in charge of overseeing utility companies; and the Mining and Energy Planning Unit, which is in charge of expansion of the generation and transmission network.
The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis with companies that provide such services.
selling their generation in the wholesale market at the short-term price or under bilateral contracts with other participants, including distribution companies, generators and traders, and unregulated customers at freely negotiated prices. The National Dispatch Center implementsdispatches generators in merit order based on bid offers in order to ensure that demand will be satisfied by the economic dispatchlowest cost combination of electricityavailable generating units.
Development Strategy — AES Colombia is committed to transform into a renewable growth platform by supporting its customers to diversify their energy supply and become more competitive. As part of this commitment, AES Colombia is developing a pipeline of 1.3 GW of solar and wind projects. Five projects (648 MW) of wind energy are located in La Guajira, one of the windiest spots on Earth, and two projects (255 MW) were awarded a 15-year PPA at the last renewable auction. One project (99 MW) of the Wind Cluster has Environmental License and the others are progressing smoothly in their development process. During 2020, AES Colombia was awarded the 61 MW San Fernando Solar project through a 15-year PPA with Ecopetrol and started construction in September. This solar project, along with the 21 MW Castilla project built in 2019 also with a PPA with Ecopetrol, has been fundamental in leading the renewable market in Colombia.
Argentina
Business Description — AES operates plants in Argentina totaling 4,220 MW, representing 10% of the country's total installed capacity. AES owns a diversified generation portfolio in Argentina in terms of geography, technology, and fuel source. AES Argentina's plants are placed in strategic locations within the country in order to provide energy to the spot market and customers, making use of wind, hydro, and thermal plants.
AES primarily sells its energy in the wholesale market. The National Dispatch Center's objectiveselectricity market where prices are to minimize the total cost of generation and maintain the reliability and securitylargely regulated. In 2020, approximately 90% of the electric power system. Short-term power prices are determined on an hourly basis by the last dispatched generating unit. Physical generation of energy is determined by the National Dispatch Center regardless of contractual arrangements.
Panama's current total installed capacity is 2,983 MW, composed primarily of hydroelectric (57%) and thermal (38%) generation.
Business Description — AES owns and operates five hydroelectric plants and one thermoelectric power plant, Estrella del Mar I, representing 705 MW and 72 MW of hydro and thermal capacity, respectively and 26% of the total installed capacity in Panama.
The majority of hydroelectric plants in Panama are based on run-of-river technology, with the exception of the 260 MW Bayano plant. Hydrological conditions have an important influence on profitability. Variations in hydrology can result in excess or a shortfall in energy production relative to our contract obligations. Hydro generation is generally in a shortfall position during low inflows from January through May, AES Panama may purchase energywas sold in the short-termwholesale electricity market to cover contractual obligations. During the remainder of the year, energy generation is generally in excess of contractual commitments, excess generation isand 10% was sold on the short-term market.under contract sales made by TermoAndes, Vientos Neuquinos, and Vientos Bonaerenses power plants.
A portion of the PPAs with distribution companies will expire in December 2018, reducing the total contracted capacity in Panama from 496 MW to 430 MW. Another portion contracted through Estrella del Mar I will expire in June 2020, reducing the total contracted capacity to 350 MW through December 2030.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Changesforced outages;
exposure to fluctuations of the Argentine peso;
changes in hydrology which impacts commodity prices and exposes the business to variability in the costwind resources;
timely collection of replacement power.
Fluctuations in commodity prices, mainly oil, affect the cost of thermal generationFONINVEMEM installments and spot prices.
Constraints imposed by the capacity of the transmission lines connecting the west side of the country with the load, keeping surplus power trapped during the wet season.
Country demand as GDP growth is expected to remain strong over the short and medium term.
Construction and Development — In August 2015, AES executed a partnership agreement with Deeplight Corporation, a minority partner, to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas power generation plant and a liquefied natural gas terminal, in order to purchase and sell energy and capacity as well as commercialize natural gas and other ancillary activities related to natural gas. As of December 31, 2017, amounts capitalized include $666 million recorded in construction-in-progress and the project is scheduled to initiate operations in the second half of 2018.
Mexico
outstanding receivables (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below); and
natural gas prices and availability for contracted generation at Termoandes.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure MexicoArgentina has a single electric grid,one main power system, the National Electricity System, covering allSADI, which serves 96% of Mexico's territory through the Interconnected National Electricity, Baja Californiacountry. As of December 31, 2020, the installed capacity of the SADI totaled 41,991 MW. The SADI's installed capacity is composed primarily of thermoelectric generation (61%) and Southern Baja California Systems.hydroelectric generation (27%), as well as wind (6%), nuclear (4%), and solar (2%).
Thermoelectric generation in the SADI is primarily natural gas. However, scarcity of natural gas during winter periods (June to August) due to transport constraints result in the use of alternative fuels, such as oil and coal. The SADI is also highly reliant on hydroelectric plants. Hydrological conditions impact reservoir water levels and largely influence the dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants and, therefore, influence market comprisescosts. Precipitation in Argentina occurs principally from June to August.
The Argentine regulatory framework divides the electricity sector into generation, transmission, and distribution. The wholesale electric market is comprised of generation companies, transmission companies, distribution companies, and commercialization segments.large customers who are permitted to trade electricity. Generation companies can sell
Three main agencies,


30 | 2020 Annual Report

their output in the spot market or under PPAs. CAMMESA manages the electricity market and is responsible for dispatch coordination. The Electricity National Regulatory Agency is in charge of regulating public service activities and the Secretariat of Energy regulates system framework and grants concessions or authorizations for sector activities. In Argentina, there is a tolling scheme in which the regulator establishes prices for electricity and defines fuel reference prices. As a result, our businesses are particularly sensitive to changes in regulation.
The Argentine electric market is an "average cost" system. Generators are compensated for fixed costs and non-fuel variable costs, under prices denominated in Argentine pesos. CAMMESA is in charge of providing the natural gas and liquid fuels required by the generation companies, except for coal.
During 2020, the government has maintained prices to the end user, increasing subsidies and the system deficit. By December 2020, distribution companies recovered an average 55% of the total cost of the system.
AES Argentina contributed certain accounts receivable to fund the construction of new power plants under FONINVEMEM agreements. These receivables accrue interest and have been collected in monthly installments over 10 years after commercial operation date of the related plant took place. AES Argentina participated in the construction of three power plants under the FONINVEMEM structure, and in addition to the Ministryrepayment of Energy,the accounts receivable contributed, AES Argentina will receive a pro rata ownership interest in each of these plants once the accounts receivables have been fully repaid. FONINVEMEM I and II installments were fully repaid in the first quarter of 2020 and the ownership interests in Termoeléctrica San Martín and Termoeléctrica Manuel Belgrano power plants are responsible subject to agreement between the government and all generators that participated in the funds. FONINVEMEM III installments, related to Termoeléctrica Guillermo Brown which commenced operations in April 2016, are still being collected. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity—Long-Term Receivables and Note 7.Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-Kfor monitoring compliance withfurther discussion of receivables in Argentina.
In 2019 and 2020, the Electric Industry Law:
The Energy Regulatory Commission is responsibleArgentine peso devalued against the USD by approximately 37% and 29%, respectively, and Argentina’s economy continued to be highly inflationary. Since September 2019, currency controls have been established to govern the devaluation of the Argentine peso and keep Argentine central bank reserves at acceptable levels for the establishmentnext government of directives, orders, methodologiesArgentina.
Development Strategy — Currently, 800 MW of renewable greenfield projects are in early and standards orientedmid stages of development. These projects could be used to regulateparticipate in future private PPAs or public auctions. In addition, "behind the electricmeter” and fuel markets.off-grid solutions are being developed for the industrial sector (mining), including solar power plants plus BESS.

Brazil

Business Description — AES Brasil (the business formerly branded as AES Tietê) has a portfolio of 12 hydroelectric power plants in the state of São Paulo with total installed capacity of 2,658 MW. These hydroelectric plants operate under a 30-year concession expiring in 2029.
The National Center for Energy Control, as new ISO, is responsible for managingOver the wholesale electricity market, transmissionpast three years, AES Brasil acquired and distribution infrastructure, planningdeveloped two solar power complexes in the network developments, guaranteeing open access to network infrastructure, executing competitive mechanisms to cover regulated demand, and setting transmission charges.
The Federal Electricity Commission ("CFE") owns the transmission and distribution grids and it is also the country's basic supplier. CFE is the offtaker for IPP generators,state of São Paulo, which are fully contracted with 20-year PPAs and together with its own power units has more than 50%account for 294 MW of installed capacity. AES Brasil represents approximately 12% of the currenttotal generation market share.capacity in the state of São Paulo.
Mexico hasAES Brasil also owns Alto Sertão II, a wind complex located in the state of Bahia with an installed capacity totaling 74 GWof 386 MW and subject to 20-year PPAs expiring between 2033 and 2035, and in December 2020, also acquired the Ventus wind complex located in the State of Rio Grande do Norte with an installed capacity of 187 MW and subject to a generation mix primarily comprising20-year PPA expiring in 2032.
In the second half of thermal (71%)2020, AES acquired an additional 19.8% ownership in AES Brasil. As of December 31, 2020, AES owns 44% of AES Brasil and hydroelectric (17%) plants.
Business Description is the controlling shareholder and manages and consolidates this business. As a result of the transaction, AES has 1,055 MWalso committed to transition the listing of installed capacity in Mexico. The TEG and TEP pet coke-fired plants, located in Tamuin, San Luis Potosi, supply power to their offtakers under long-term PPAs expiring in 2027 with a 90% availability guarantee. TEG and TEP secure their fuel under a long-term contract.
Merida is a CCGT, located in Merida, on Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. Merida sells powerAES Brasil's shares to the CFE underNovo Mercado, a capacity and energy based long-term PPA through 2025. Additionally, the plant purchases natural gas and diesel under a long-term contract with onelisting segment of the CFE’s subsidiaries,Brazilian stock exchange with the costhighest standards of whichcorporate governance. The transition to Novo Mercado is then passed throughexpected to CFE under the terms of the PPA.
AES has partnered in a joint venture with Grupo BAL to co-invest in power and related infrastructure projects in Mexico, focusing on renewable and natural gas generation. The first development, a 306 MW wind project, expects to begin constructionoccur in the first half of 2018.2021.
In December 2020, AES Brasil entered into an agreement for the acquisition of the MS Wind and Santos Wind Complexes, located in the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará, respectively. The complexes have been


31 | 2020 Annual Report

operational since 2013 with 159 MW of installed capacity, fully sold in the regulated market for 20 years.
AES Brasil aims to contract most of its physical guarantee requirements and sell the remaining portion in the spot market. The commercial strategy is reassessed periodically according to changes in market conditions, hydrology, and other factors. AES Brasil generally sells available energy through medium-term bilateral contracts.
Key Financial Drivers FinancialThe electricity market in Brazil is highly dependent on hydroelectric generation, therefore electricity pricing is driven by hydrology. Plant availability is also a significant financial driver as in times of high hydrology, AES is more exposed to the spot market. AES Brasil's financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Ashydrology, impacting quantity of energy generated in the MRE (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below for further information);
growth in demand for energy;
market price risk when re-contracting;
asset management;
cost management; and
ability to execute on its growth strategy.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — In Brazil, the Ministry of Mines and Energy determines the maximum amount of energy a generation plant can sell, called physical guarantee, representing the long-term average expected energy production of the plant. Under current rules, physical guarantee energy can be sold to distribution companies through long-term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies.
Brazil has installed capacity of 176 GW, composed of hydroelectric (62%), thermoelectric (25%), renewable (12%), and nuclear (1%) sources. Operation is centralized and controlled by the national operator, ONS, and regulated by the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency ("ANEEL"). The ONS dispatches generators based on their marginal cost of production and on the risk of system rationing. Key variables for the dispatch decision are fully contracted, improved operational performance provides additional benefits, including performance incentives and/orforecasted hydrological conditions, reservoir levels, electricity demand, fuel prices, and thermal generation availability.
In case of unfavorable hydrology, the ONS will reduce hydroelectric dispatch to preserve reservoir levels and increase dispatch of thermal plants to meet demand. The consequences of unfavorable hydrology are (i) higher energy spot prices due to higher energy production costs by thermal plants and (ii) the need for hydro plants to purchase energy in the spot market to fulfill their contractual obligations.
A mechanism known as the MRE was created under ONS to share hydrological risk across MRE hydro generators by using a generation scaling factor ("GSF") to adjust generators' physical guarantee during periods of hydrological scarcity. If the hydro plants generate less than the total MRE physical guarantee, the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market. When total hydro generation is higher than the total MRE physical guarantee, the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they may sell the excess energy sales.on the spot market.
ChangesIn September 2020, Law 14.052/2020 published by ANEEL was approved by the President, establishing terms for compensation to MRE hydro generators for the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 to 2018, which resulted in higher charges assessed to MRE hydro generators by the regulator. Under the law, potential compensation will be in the Locational Marginal Priceform of an offer for a concession extension for each hydro generator in exchange for full payment of billed GSF trade payables, the amount of which will be reduced in conjunction with the payment for a concession extension. See Key Trends and UncertaintiesRegulatory in Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-K.
Development Strategy — AES Brasil's strategy is to grow by adding renewable capacity to its generation platform through acquisition or greenfield projects, to focus on client satisfaction and innovation to offer new products and energy solutions, and to be recognized for excellence in asset management.
In 2020, AES Brasil acquired the Transmission High Tension Tariff.Tucano Project, a 582 MW greenfield wind power project in the state of Bahia, for which construction is scheduled to start in 2021 and when completed, will supply long-term PPAs. The first phase (155 MW) will be developed in 2021 through a joint venture with Unipar Carbocloro for a 20-year PPA starting in 2022. The second phase (167 MW) will be 100% developed by AES Brasil in 2021, for a 15-year PPA with Anglo American starting in 2022. AES Brasil is seeking other long-term PPAs to fulfill the remaining 260 MW.


32 | 2020 Annual Report

In March 2020, AES Brasil signed two purchase option agreements for a total installed capacity up to 1,100 MW of Cajuína greenfield wind power project in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, which are being exercised as the company secures long-term PPAs. In August 2020, AES Brasil signed a Shareholder Purchase Agreement ("SPA") for the first phase, Santa Tereza, which has installed capacity of 420 MW. Closing is expected to occur in the first quarter of 2021. A Memorandum of Understanding was signed with Ferbasa for 80 MW energy supply over a period of 20 years, beginning in 2024. The SPA for the second phase, São Ricardo, which has installed capacity of 437 MW, was signed in February 2021. AES Brasil is seeking other long-term PPAs to fulfill the remaining 777 MW in phases 1 and 2.
Under the current terms of the 2018 legal agreement in connection with AES Brasil's concession with the state government, AES Brasil is required to increase its capacity in the state of São Paulo by an additional 81 MW by October 2024.


33 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g9.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.



34 | 2020 Annual Report

Puerto Rico
Business Description — AES Puerto Rico owns and operates a coal-fired cogeneration plant and a solar plant of 524 MW and 24 MW, respectively, representing approximately 8% of the installed capacity in Puerto Rico. Both plants are fully contracted through long-term PPAs with PREPA expiring in 2027 and 2032, respectively. AES Puerto Rico receives a capacity payment based on the plants' twelve month rolling average availability, receiving the full payment when the availability is 90% or higher. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Puerto Rico for further discussion of the long-term PPAs with PREPA.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to, improved operational performance and plant availability.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure— Puerto Rico has a single electric grid managed by PREPA, a state-owned entity that suppliesprovides virtually all of the electric power consumed in Puerto Rico and generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to 1.5 million customers. The Puerto Rico Energy Commission ("PREC")Bureau is the main regulatory body. The commissionbureau approves wholesale and retail rates, sets efficiency and interconnection standards, and oversees PREPA's compliance with Puerto Rico's renewable portfolio standard.
Puerto Rico's electricity is 98%97% produced by thermal plants (47% from petroleum, 34%(43% from natural gas, 17%36% from petroleum, and 18% from coal).
AES Clean Energy
Business Description — AES Puerto Rico ownsmanages the U.S. renewables portfolio, which comprises AES Distributed Energy, sPower and operates a coal-fired cogeneration plantother renewable assets, as part of its broader investments in the U.S. On January 4, 2021, the sPower and a solar plant of 524 MWAES Distributed Energy development platforms were merged to form AES Clean Energy Development, which will serve as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. sPower remains an AES unconsolidated affiliate after this merger. Collectively, AES Distributed Energy, sPower, AES Clean Energy Development, and 24 MW, respectively, representing approximately 9%the other renewable assets in the U.S. are referred to as AES Clean Energy.
Prior to the merger, both AES and sPower were recognized leaders in renewable development in the U.S. Together, AES Clean Energy is one of the installedtop renewables growth platforms and the expanded team aims to solve our customers' energy challenges. AES Clean Energy offers its customers an expanded portfolio of innovative solutions based on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to accelerate their energy futures. Generation capacity of the systems owned and/or operated under AES Clean Energy is 2,983 MW across the U.S. with another 299 MW under construction. This capacity includes 2,066 MW of solar, 1,085 MW of wind, and 131 MW of energy storage.
A majority of solar projects under AES Clean Energy have been financed with tax equity structures. Under these tax equity structures, the tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. Based on certain liquidation provisions of the tax equity structures, this could result in Puerto Rico. Both plants havevariability to earnings attributable to AES compared to the earnings reported at the facilities.
Key Financial Drivers — The financial results of AES Clean Energy are primarily driven by the efficient construction and operation of renewable energy facilities across the U.S. under long-term PPAs, expiring in 2027 and 2032, respectively, with PREPA. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysisthrough which the energy price on the entire production of Financial Condition and Resultsthese facilities is guaranteed. The financial results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Puerto Rico for further discussion of the long-term PPA with PREPA.
Eurasia SBU
Generation — Our Eurasia SBU has generation facilities in seven countries. Operating installed capacity totaled 6,143 MW. The following table lists our Eurasia SBU generation facilities:


renewable assets are


Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)
Maritza Bulgaria Coal 690
 100% 2011 2026 Natsionalna Elektricheska
St. Nikola Bulgaria Wind 156
 89% 2010 2025 Natsionalna Elektricheska
Bulgaria Subtotal     846
        
OPGC (1)
 India Coal 420
 49% 1998 2026 GRID Corporation Ltd.
India Subtotal     420
        
Amman East Jordan Gas 381
 37% 2009 2033 National Electric Power Company
IPP4 Jordan Heavy Fuel Oil 250
 36% 2014 2039 National Electric Power Company
Jordan Subtotal     631
        
Elsta (1)(2) 
 Netherlands Gas 630
 50% 1998 2018 Dow Benelux/Delta/Nutsbedrijven/Essent Energy
Netherlands ES Netherlands Energy Storage 10
 100% 2015    
Netherlands Subtotal     640
        
Masinloc (3)
 Philippines Coal 630
 51% 2008 Mid- and long-term Various
Masinloc ES (3)
 Philippines Energy Storage 10
 51% 2016    
Philippines Subtotal     640
        
Ballylumford United Kingdom Gas 1,015
 100% 2010 2023 Power NI/Single Electricity Market (SEM)
Kilroot (4)
 United Kingdom Coal/Oil 701
 99% 1992   Single Electricity Market (SEM)
Kilroot ES United Kingdom Energy Storage 10
 100% 2015    
United Kingdom Subtotal     1,726
        
Mong Duong 2 Vietnam Coal 1,240
 51% 2015 2040 EVN
Vietnam Subtotal     1,240
        
      6,143
        
_____________________________
(1)
Unconsolidated entity, the results of operations of which are reflected in Equity in Earnings of Affiliates.21 | 2020 Annual Report
(2)
Plant will be sold upon expiration of the PPA in September 2018.
(3)
Announced the sale of this business in December 2017.
(4)
Includes Kilroot Open Cycle Gas Turbine.
Under
primarily driven by the amount of wind or solar resource at the facilities, availability of facilities, and growth in projects.
Laurel Mountain, Buffalo Gap II and Buffalo Gap III are exposed to the volatility of energy prices and their revenue may change materially as energy prices fluctuate in their respective markets of operations. Laurel Mountain also operates 16 MW of battery energy storage that is sold into the PJM market as regulation energy. For these projects, PJM and ERCOT power prices impact financial results.
Development Strategy — As states, communities, and organizations of all types make commitments and plan to reduce their carbon footprints, renewables are the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the U.S. AES Clean Energy works with its customers to co-create and deliver the smarter, greener energy solutions that meet their needs, including 24/7 carbon-free energy. The merged renewables platform has brought together sPower's and AES' differentiated capabilities in solar, wind, and energy storage to accelerate customers' energy transitions.
AES Clean Energy has a renewable project backlog that includes 2,206 MW of projects for which long-term PPAs have been signed or, as applicable, tariffs have been assigned through a regulatory process. The budget for construction — The following table lists our plantsof the projects currently under construction and the contracted projects is over $3.9 billion. AES Clean Energy is actively developing new products and renewable sites to serve the current and future needs of its customers.
U.S. Environmental Regulation
For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
El Salvador
Business Description — AES El Salvador is the majority owner of four of the five distribution companies operating in El Salvador (CAESS, CLESA, EEO and DEUSEM). AES El Salvador's territory covers 77% of the Eurasia SBU:country and accounted for 3,640 GWh of the wholesale market energy sales during 2020. AES El Salvador is also a 50% owner and operator of Bosforo, a 100 MW solar farm. The energy produced by this solar farm is fully contracted by AES' utilities in El Salvador.
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
OPGC 2 (1)
 India Coal 1,320
 49% 2H 2018
Delhi ES India Energy Storage 10
 50% 2H 2018
      1,330
(2) 
  
_____________________________
(1)
Unconsolidated entity, accounted forIn addition, AES El Salvador offers customers non-regulated services such as an equity affiliate.
(2)
In December 2017, AES announced the sale of Masinloc. As such, 335 MW under construction at Masinloc 2 has been excluded from this table.


The following map illustrates the location of our Eurasia facilities:
Eurasia Businesses
Bulgaria
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The electricity sector in Bulgaria allows both regulated and competitive segments. NEK, the state-owned electricity public supplier and energy trading, company, acts as a single buyerelectromechanical construction, O&M of electrical assets, EPC, pole rental, and sellertax collection for all regulated transactions on the market. Electricity outside the regulated market trades at bilaterally negotiated prices in an open market or on the day-ahead IBEX market. In March 2017, IBEX introduced an intra-day market platform. In addition, IBEX launched a platform for trading long-term contracts in Q4 2016. Effective January 1, 2018 all electricity outside regulated quotas may only be traded via the IBEX platform. Bulgaria is working with the European Commission and the World Bank on a model that will allow the gradual phase out of regulated energy prices.municipalities.
Bulgaria’s power sector is supported by a diverse generation mix, a stable regulatory environment, universal access to the grid, and numerous cross-border connections in neighboring countries. In addition, it plays an important role in the energy balance on the Balkan region.
Bulgaria has 13 GW of installed capacity enabling the country to meet and exceed domestic demand and export energy. Installed capacity is 39% coal-fired and 16% nuclear.
Business Description — Our Maritza plant is a 690 MW lignite fuel thermal power plant commissioned in June 2011. Maritza's entire power output is contracted with NEK under a 15-year PPA, expiring in May 2026.
AES also owns an 89% economic interest in the St. Nikola wind farm with 156 MW of installed capacity. St. Nikola was commissioned in March 2010. Its entire power output is contracted with NEK under a 15-year PPA expiring in March 2025.
Our plants in Bulgaria operate under long-term PPAs with NEK, which has previously experienced liquidity issues. In April 2016, NEK paid Maritza its overdue receivables in exchange for amending the PPA and reducing the capacity payment to Maritza by 14% through the remaining PPA term. Maritza has experienced timely collection of outstanding receivables from NEK since May 2016. However, NEK's liquidity position remains subject to political conditions and regulatory changes in Bulgaria.
The DG Comp is reviewing NEK’s PPA with Maritza pursuant to the European Commission’s state aid rules.


Maritza believes that its PPA is legal and in compliance with all applicable laws. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Regulatory.
Key Financial Drivers Both businesses, Maritza and St. Nikola, operate under PPA contracts. For the duration of the PPA, financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Regulatory changes to the Bulgaria power market
Results of the DG Comp review
The availability of the operating units
The level of wind resources for St. Nikola
NEK's ability to meet the payment terms of the PPA contract
United Kingdom
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The electricity sector in Northern Ireland is operated by the SEM. It is based on a gross mandatory pool within which all generators with capacity higher than 10 MW must trade the physical delivery of power. Generators are centrally dispatched based on merit order and physical constraints of the system.
In addition, the SEM has a capacity payment mechanism to ensure that sufficient generating capacity is offered to the market. The capacity payment is derived from a regulated Euro-based capacity payment pool, established a year ahead by the regulatory authority. Capacity payments are based on the expected availability of a unit and are subject to volatility due to seasonal influences, demand, and the actual generation available over each trading period. In the second quarter of 2018 regulatory authorities are expected to update the market framework to reflect the integration of the SEM day-ahead and intra-day markets with EU energy markets, introduce a new competitive capacity auction, and revise arrangements for system services to incentivize flexibility. The market will be renamed I-SEM (Integrated Single Electricity Market) to reflect these changes.
Northern Ireland's power sector is supported by a diverse generation mix, a stable regulatory environment, universal access to the grid, and connections between Northern and Southern Ireland and the UK. Installed capacity in the SEM is 49% gas fired and 26% from renewable sources, resulting in sensitivity to gas prices relative to order of merit. SEM has also set a target of 40% renewable generation by 2020.
Business Description — AES has two generation plants in the United Kingdom, both of which are located in Northern Ireland within the Greater Belfast region. Kilroot is a 701 MW coal-fired merchant plant, with an additional 10 MW of energy storage, that bids into the I-SEM. Kilroot's coal fired units failed to clear in the first I-SEM capacity auction process. Consequently, AES announced its intent to shut down the coal units on or before May 31, 2018, pending the results of an assessment by the regulator to determine the long term needs of the Northern Ireland power grid. Ballylumford is a 1,015 MW gas-fired plant, of which 600 MW is contracted under a PPA with Power NI Power Procurement Business expiring in 2023. The 415 MW remaining capacity is bid into the SEM market, with 310 MW subject to a supplemental Local Reserve Services Agreement with the system operator. One of Ballylumford's B-station units failed to clear the aforementioned I-SEM capacity auction; as a result, AES intends to retire that unit at the end of December 2018.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Regulatory changesimproved operational performance;
variability in energy demand driven by weather; and
the impact of fuel oil prices on energy tariff prices, which affect cash flow due to a three-month delay in the pass-through of energy costs to the market structure and payment mechanismstariffs charged to customers.
Investments to maintain compliance with European Union environmental legislation
Availability of the operating units and order of merit
Commodity prices (gas, coal and CO2) and sufficient market liquidity to hedge prices in the short-term
Electricity demand in the SEM (including impact of wind generation)
Kazakhstan
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure El Salvador's national electric market is composed of generation, distribution, transmission, and marketing businesses, a market and system operator, and regulatory agencies. The Kazakhstan government has grouped generators into fifteen groupsoperation of the transmission system and the wholesale market is based on production costs with a numbermarginal economic model that rewards efficiency and allows investors to have guaranteed profits, while end users receive affordable rates. The energy sector is governed by the General Electricity Law, which establishes two regulatory entities responsible for monitoring its compliance:
The National Energy Council is the highest authority on energy policy and strategy, and the coordinating body for the different energy sectors. One of factors, including plant typeits main objectives is to promote investment in non-conventional renewable sources to diversify the energy matrix.
The General Superintendence of Electricity and fuel used. Each groupTelecommunications regulates the market and sets consumer prices, and, jointly with the distribution companies in El Salvador, developed the tariff calculation applicable from 2018 until 2022. The next tariff calculation is scheduled for 2022, and will be effective starting in 2023.
El Salvador has a fixed tariff-cap levelnational electric grid that interconnects directly with Guatemala and Honduras, allowing transactions with all generators must sell electricity at or below their respective tariff-cap levels.Central American countries. The sector has approximately 1,799 MW of installed capacity, composed of thermal (40%), hydroelectric (31%), solar (11%), biomass (9%), and geothermal (9%) generation plants.
Business Description Development Strategy In order to explore new business opportunities, AES operatedEl Salvador created AES


22 | 2020 Annual Report

Soluciones, an LED public lighting service provider and the main commercial and industrial solar photovoltaic EPC provider in the country. AES Next is also the O&M services provider for the Bosforo project.



23 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g7.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.


24 | 2020 Annual Report

South America SBU
Our South America SBU has generation facilities in four plants withcountries — Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Brazil. AES Gener is a totalpublicly traded company in Chile and owns all of our assets in Chile, AES Chivor in Colombia and TermoAndes in Argentina, as detailed below. AES has a 66.7% ownership interest in AES Gener and this business is consolidated in our financial statements. AES Brasil (the business formerly branded as AES Tietê) is a publicly traded company in Brazil. AES controls and consolidates AES Brasil through its 44% economic interest.
Operating installed capacity of 2,776 MW. Our two hydroelectric plants, representing 1,033 MW, were operated under a concession agreement until early October 2017, when the plants were transferred back to the Republic of Kazakhstan. The remaining 1,743 MW coal-fired capacity was sold in the second quarter of 2017.


Jordan
Regulatory framework and market structure — The Jordan electricity transmission market is a single-buyer model with the state owned NEPCO responsible for transmission. NEPCO generally enters into long term power purchase agreements with IPP's to fulfill energy procurement requests from distribution utilities. The sector is prioritizing renewable energy development, with 2,200 MW of renewable energy installed capacity expected by year 2020, 700our South America SBU totals 12,304 MW, of which was already connected to the grid.
Business Description — In Jordan, AES has a 37% controlling interest in Amman East, a 381 MW oil/gas-fired plant fully contracted with the national utility under a 25-year PPA expiring in 2033,34%, 29%, 8%, and a 36% controlling interest in the IPP4 plant, a 250 MW oil/gas-fired peaker plant which commenced operations in July 2014, fully contracted with the national utility until 2039. We consolidate the results in our operations as we have controlling interest in these businesses.
Construction and Development AES, in conjunction with Mitsui & Co of Japan and NEBRAS Power of Qatar, have signed an agreement to construct a 52 MW solar project in Jordan. Construction of the plant has not begun, but is expected to be completed mid-2019 to coincide with the start of a PPA to provide energy to NEPCO through 2038.
India
Regulatory framework and Market Structure — The power sector is largely dominated by state and central government-owned generation and distribution utilities. Electricity is generally sold to state utilities under long-term PPAs. The tariffs29% are fixed on yearly basis by the Electricity Regulatory Commissions of the Centre and the State(s) or determined through competitive bidding process. Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission ("OERC") regulates the electricity purchase and procurement process for the Distribution Licensees, including the price at which the electricity from generating companies shall be procured for supply within the state of Orissa. OERC also facilitates interstate transmission and wheeling of electricity. OERC is guided by the National Electricity Policy, National Electricity Plan and Tariff Policy issued by the Government of India.
The power sector in India is composed of coal, gas, hydroelectric, renewable and nuclear energy. Total installed capacity as of December 31, 2017 was 331 GW, of which 66% is thermal generation. Renewable energy is adding capacity at a rapid pace and currently represents 18% of the total installed capacity.
Business Description — OPGC is a 420 MW coal-fired generation facility located in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Brazil, respectively. The following table lists our South America SBU generation facilities:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
ChivorColombiaHydro1,000 67 %20002020-2037Various
CastillaColombiaSolar21 67 %20192034Ecopetrol
TunjitaColombiaHydro20 67 %2016
Colombia Subtotal1,041 
Gener - Chile (1)
ChileCoal/Hydro/Diesel/Solar/Wind/Biomass1,578 67 %20002020-2040Various
Guacolda (2)
ChileCoal764 33 %20002020-2032Various
Electrica AngamosChileCoal558 67 %20112021Minera Escondida, Minera Spence, Quebrada Blanca
CochraneChileCoal550 40 %20162030-2037SQM, Sierra Gorda, Quebrada Blanca
Cochrane ESChileEnergy Storage20 40 %2016
Electrica Angamos ESChileEnergy Storage20 67 %2011
Norgener ES (Los Andes)ChileEnergy Storage12 67 %2009
Alfalfal Virtual ReservoirChileEnergy Storage10 67 %2020
Chile Subtotal3,512 
TermoAndes (3)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel643 67 %20002020Various
AES Gener Subtotal5,196 
AlicuraArgentinaHydro1,050 100 %2000
Paraná-GTArgentinaGas/Diesel870 100 %2001
San NicolásArgentinaCoal/Gas/Oil/Energy Storage691 100 %1993
Guillermo Brown (4)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel576 — %2016
Cabra CorralArgentinaHydro102 100 %1995Various
Vientos BonaerensesArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
Vientos NeuquinosArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
UllumArgentinaHydro45 100 %1996Various
SarmientoArgentinaGas/Diesel33 100 %1996
El TunalArgentinaHydro10 100 %1995Various
Argentina Subtotal3,577 
Tietê (5)
BrazilHydro2,658 44 %19992029Various
Alto Sertão IIBrazilWind386 44 %20172033-2035Various
VentusBrazilWind187 44 %20202034Regulated Market
GuaimbêBrazilSolar150 44 %20182037CCEE
AGV SolarBrazilSolar75 44 %20192039Various
Boa HoraBrazilSolar69 44 %20192035CCEE
Drogaria AraujoBrazilSolar44 %20192029Drogaria Araujo
Brasil Community SolarBrazilSolar44 %2020
AES Brasil Subtotal3,531 
12,304 
_____________________________
(1)Gener - Chile plants: Alfalfal, Andes Solar, Andes Solar 2a, Laguna Verde, Laja, Los Cururos, Maitenes, Norgener 1, Norgener 2, Queltehues, Ventanas 2, Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4 and Volcán. In December 2020, AES Gener requested the stateretirement of Odisha. OPGC has a 30-year PPA with GRIDCO Limited, a state utility, expiring in 2026. OPGCVentanas 1 and 2. Ventanas 1 initiated strategic reserve mode and Ventanas 2 is waiting for approval.
(2)Guacolda is comprised of five coal-fired units under Guacolda Energia S.A., an unconsolidated entity andfor which the results of operations are reported as reflected in Net equity in earnings of affiliates on. The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 34%.


25 | 2020 Annual Report

(3)TermoAndes is located in Argentina, but is connected to both the SEN in Chile and the SADI in Argentina.
(4)AES operates this facility through management or O&M agreements and to date owns no equity interest in the business.
(5)Tietê hydro plants: Água Vermelha, Bariri, Barra Bonita, Caconde, Euclides da Cunha, Ibitinga, Limoeiro, Mogi-Guaçu, Nova Avanhandava, Promissão, Sao Joaquim and Sao Jose.
Under construction — The following table lists our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Construction and Development — AES has one 1,320 MW coal-fired projectplants under construction in the South America SBU:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
Tucano Phase 2BrazilWind167 44 %2H 2022
Tucano Phase 1BrazilWind155 44 %2H 2022
McDonaldsBrazilSolar44 %1H 2021
Farmácias São JoãoBrazilSolar44 %1H 2021
AES Brasil Subtotal330 
Alto Maipo (1)
ChileHydro531 62 %2H 2021
Los OlmosChileWind110 67 %1H 2021
Campo LindoChileWind73 67 %1H 2021
MesamávidaChileWind68 67 %2H 2021
Andes Solar 2bChileSolar180 67 %2H 2021
Energy Storage112 
Chile Subtotal1,074 
San FernandoColombiaSolar59 67 %2H 2021
Colombia Subtotal59 
1,463 
_____________________________
(1)     Alto Maipo is the largest project in construction in the Chilean market. When completed, it will include 75 km of tunnels, two power houses and expected17 km of transmission lines.

The majority of projects under construction have executed mid- to beginlong-term PPAs.
In June 2018, the Company completed the sale of its entire 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo, a distribution business in Brazil. Prior to its sale, Eletropaulo was accounted for as an equity method investment and its results of operations and financial position were reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
In September 2020, the Company completed the sale of its entire interest in AES Uruguaiana, a gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in Brazil.


26 | 2020 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our South America facilities:
South America Businesses
aes-20201231_g8.jpg
Chile
Business Description — In Chile, through AES Gener, we are engaged in the generation and supply of electricity (energy and capacity) in the SEN—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. AES Gener is the second largest generation operator in Chile in terms of installed capacity with 3,450 MW, excluding energy storage, and has a market share of approximately 13% as of December 31, 2020.
AES Gener owns a diversified generation portfolio in Chile in terms of geography, technology, customers, and energy resources. AES Gener's generation plants are located near the principal electricity consumption centers, including Santiago, Valparaiso, and Antofagasta. AES Gener's diverse generation portfolio provides flexibility for the management of contractual obligations with regulated and unregulated customers, provides backup energy to the spot market and facilitates operations under a variety of market and hydrological conditions.
AES Gener's Green Blend and Extend strategy aims to reduce carbon intensity and incorporate renewable energy to extend our existing conventional PPAs. This strategy de-links our PPAs from legacy fossil resources, grows our renewable energy portfolio, and delivers a competitive, reliable energy solution. In line with the "green blend and extend" strategy, AES Gener has committed to not build additional coal-based power plants and to advance the development of new renewable projects, including the implementation of battery energy storage systems ("BESS") and other technological innovations that will provide greater flexibility and reliability to the system.
AES Gener currently has long-term contracts, with an average remaining term of approximately 9 years, with regulated distribution companies and unregulated customers, such as mining and industrial companies. In general,


27 | 2020 Annual Report

these long-term contracts include pass-through mechanisms for fuel costs along with price indexations to U.S. Consumer Price Index ("CPI").
In addition to energy payments, AES Gener also receives capacity payments to compensate for availability during periods of peak demand. The grid operator, Coordinador Electrico Nacional ("CEN"), annually determines the capacity requirements for each power plant. The capacity price is fixed semiannually by the National Energy Commission and indexed to the CPI and other relevant indices.
Key Financial Drivers Hedge strategy at AES Gener limits volatility to the underlying financial drivers. In addition, financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
dry hydrology scenarios;
forced outages;
changes in current regulatory rulings altering the ability to pass through or recover certain costs;
fluctuations of the Chilean peso;
tax policy changes;
legislation promoting renewable energy and/or more restrictive regulations on thermal generation assets; and
market price risk when re-contracting.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Chilean electricity industry is divided into three business segments: generation, transmission, and distribution. Private companies operate in all three segments, and generators can enter into PPAs to sell energy to regulated and unregulated customers, as well as to other generators in the spot market.
Chile operates in a single power market, referred to as the SEN, which is managed by the grid operator CEN. The SEN has an installed capacity of 26,056 MW, and represents 99% of the installed generation capacity of the country.
CEN coordinates all generation and transmission companies in the SEN. CEN minimizes the operating costs of the electricity system, while maximizing service quality and reliability requirements. CEN dispatches plants in merit order based on their variable cost of production, allowing for electricity to be supplied at the lowest available cost. In the south-central region of the SEN, thermoelectric generation is required to fulfill demand not satisfied by hydroelectric, solar, and wind output and is critical to provide reliable and dependable electricity supply under dry hydrological conditions in the highest demand area of the SEN. In the northern region of the SEN, which includes the Atacama Desert, thermoelectric capacity represents the majority of installed capacity. The fuels used for thermoelectric generation, mainly coal, diesel, and LNG, are indexed to international prices. In 2020, the installed generation capacity in the Chilean market was composed of 48% thermoelectric, 27% hydroelectric, 13% solar, 10% wind, and 2% other fuel sources.
Hydroelectric plants represent a significant portion of the system's installed capacity. Precipitation and snow melt impact hydrological conditions in Chile. Rain occurs principally from June to August and snow melt occurs from September to December. These factors affect dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants, thereby influencing spot market prices.
The Ministry of Energy has primary responsibility for the Chilean electricity system directly or through the National Energy Commission and the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels.
All generators can sell energy through contracts with regulated distribution companies or directly to unregulated customers. Unregulated customers are customers whose connected capacity is higher than 5 MW. Customers with connected capacity between 0.5 MW and 5.0 MW can opt for regulated or unregulated contracts for a minimum period of four years. By law, both regulated and unregulated customers are required to purchase all electricity under contracts. Generators may also sell energy to other power generation companies on a short-term basis at negotiated prices outside the spot market. Electricity prices in Chile are denominated in USD, although payments are made in Chilean pesos.
The Chilean government’s decarbonization plan includes the complete retirement of the SEN coal fleet by the end of 2018.2040 and carbon neutrality by 2050. During the year, AES Gener announced its commitment to shut down its Ventanas 1 coal-fired plant in 2020 and its Ventanas 2 coal-fired plant in June 2022 or earlier, pending resolution of current transmission constraints, and to disconnect both plants from the SEN in 2025. On December 26, 2020, the


28 | 2020 Annual Report

Ministry of Energy’s Supreme Decree Number 42 went into effect, allowing coal plants to enter into Strategic Reserve Status (“SRS”) and receive 60% of capacity payments for the 5-year period following its shutdown to remain connected as a backup in case of a system emergency. Following the issuance of this regulation and per the disconnection and termination agreement signed with the Chilean government in June 2019, the Ventanas 1 power plant was shut down on December 29, 2020 to enter into SRS.
Environmental Regulation — In March 2019, a new decontamination plan for the Ventanas region was approved. We are currently implementing the requirements defined by the plan which will impact our Ventanas and Guacolda businesses.
Chilean law requires all electricity generators to supply a certain portion of their total contractual obligations with non-conventional renewable energy ("NCREs"). Generation companies are able to meet this requirement by building NCRE generation capacity (wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and small hydroelectric technology) or purchasing NCREs from qualified generators. Non-compliance with the NCRE requirements will result in fines. AES Gener currently fulfills the NCRE requirements by utilizing AES Gener's solar and biomass power plants and by purchasing NCREs from other generation companies. At present, AES Gener is in the process of negotiating additional NCRE supply contracts to meet future requirements.
Since 2017, emissions of particulate matter, SO2, NOX, and CO2 are monitored for plants with an installed capacity over 50 MW; these emissions are taxed. In the case of CO2, the tax is equivalent to $5 per ton emitted. Certain PPAs have clauses allowing the Company to pass the green tax costs to unregulated customers, while some distribution PPAs do not allow for the pass through of these costs.
Development Strategy — AES Gener is committed to reducing the coal intensity of the Chilean power grid and plans to increase the renewable energy capacity in its portfolio. As part of this commitment, and in addition to the 531 MW hydroelectric generation that Alto Maipo will deliver to the system, AES Gener purchased the 110 MW Los Cururos wind farm and its substation in northern Chile, and has finished construction on the 80 MW Andes 2a facility. Also under construction are the 110 MW Los Olmos wind farm, 66 MW Mesamávida wind farm, 73 MW Campo Lindo wind farm, and 180 MW Andes Solar 2b facility, which also includes 112 MW of BESS, to supply agreements with its main mining customers in execution of the new Green Blend and Extend strategy. In total, the pipeline currently has 4.4 GW under development at different stages and diversified geographically.
AES Gener executes its Green Blend and Extend strategy by integrating renewable energy sources into its portfolio, and by providing contracting options that contain a mix of both renewable and nonrenewable solutions.
Colombia
Business Description — We operate in Colombia through AES Chivor, a subsidiary of AES Gener, which owns a hydroelectric plant with an installed capacity of 1,000 MW and Tunjita, a 20 MW run-of-river hydroelectric plant, both located approximately 160 km east of Bogota, as well as Castilla, a 21 MW solar facility. AES Chivor’s installed capacity accounted for approximately 6% of system capacity at the end of 2020. AES Chivor is dependent on hydrological conditions, which influence generation and spot prices of non-contracted generation in Colombia.
AES Chivor's commercial strategy aims to execute contracts with commercial and industrial customers and bid in public tenders, mainly with distribution companies, in order to reduce margin volatility with proper portfolio risk management. The remaining energy generated by our portfolio is sold to the spot market, including ancillary services. Additionally, AES Chivor receives reliability payments for maintaining the plant's availability and generating firm energy during periods of power scarcity, such as adverse hydrological conditions, in order to prevent power shortages.
Key Financial Drivers — Hydrological conditions largely influence Chivor's power generation. Maintaining the appropriate contract level, while maximizing revenue through the sale of excess generation, is key to Chivor's results of operations. In addition to hydrology, financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
forced outages;
fluctuations of the Colombian peso; and
spot market prices.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Electricity supply in Colombia is concentrated in one main system, the SIN, which encompasses one-third of Colombia's territory, providing electricity to 97% of the country's population. The SIN's installed capacity, primarily hydroelectric (69%) and thermal (31%), totaled 17,473 MW as of


29 | 2020 Annual Report

December 31, 2017,2020. The marked seasonal variations in Colombia's hydrology result in price volatility in the short-term market. In 2020, 72% of total capitalized costs atenergy demand was supplied by hydroelectric plants.
The electricity sector in Colombia operates under a competitive market framework for the project level were $1.1 billion. Currently, 50%generation and sale of electricity, and a regulated framework for transmission and distribution of electricity. The distinct activities of the expansion capacity, or 660 MW,electricity sector are governed by Colombian laws and CREG, the Colombian regulating entity for energy and gas. Other government entities have a role in the electricity industry, including the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which defines the government's policy for the energy sector; the Public Utility Superintendency of Colombia, which is contracted with GRIDCO for a periodin charge of 25 years. The remaining 50%overseeing utility companies; and the Mining and Energy Planning Unit, which is in charge of expansion of the generation capacityand transmission network.
The generation sector is proposedorganized on a competitive basis with companies selling their generation in the wholesale market at the short-term price or under bilateral contracts with other participants, including distribution companies, generators and traders, and unregulated customers at freely negotiated prices. The National Dispatch Center dispatches generators in merit order based on bid offers in order to be offered to GRIDCO under a new PPA.
Environmental Regulation — The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change in India amended the Environment (Protection) Rules with stricter emission limits for thermal power plants via their notification issued in December 2015. All existing plants installed before December 31, 2003 are required to meet revised emission limits within two years and any new thermal power plantsensure that demand will be operational from January 1, 2017satisfied by the lowest cost combination of available generating units.
Development Strategy — AES Colombia is committed to transform into a renewable growth platform by supporting its customers to diversify their energy supply and become more competitive. As part of this commitment, AES Colombia is developing a pipeline of 1.3 GW of solar and wind projects. Five projects (648 MW) of wind energy are required to operatelocated in La Guajira, one of the windiest spots on Earth, and two projects (255 MW) were awarded a 15-year PPA at the last renewable auction. One project (99 MW) of the Wind Cluster has Environmental License and the others are progressing smoothly in their development process. During 2020, AES Colombia was awarded the 61 MW San Fernando Solar project through a 15-year PPA with Ecopetrol and started construction in September. This solar project, along with the revised emission limits. As21 MW Castilla project built in 2019 also with a resultPPA with Ecopetrol, has been fundamental in leading the renewable market in Colombia.
Argentina
Business Description — AES operates plants in Argentina totaling 4,220 MW, representing 10% of this amendment, FGD systems needthe country's total installed capacity. AES owns a diversified generation portfolio in Argentina in terms of geography, technology, and fuel source. AES Argentina's plants are placed in strategic locations within the country in order to be installedprovide energy to the spot market and customers, making use of wind, hydro, and thermal plants.
AES primarily sells its energy in the existing OPGC units to comply with the new SO2 emissions requirements, and new design options modifications to the schedulewholesale electricity market where prices are largely regulated. In 2020, approximately 90% of the expansion project have been evaluated. As these amendments will require substantial investment to meet the revised environmental guidelines across the public and private power sectors in India, amendments and implementation time lines are still under review by the Ministry of Power, Government of India. We believe the cost of complying with the new environmental regulations for particulate matters, water consumption, Sox and Nox limits will be a pass-throughenergy was sold in the GRIDCO tariff for both the existingwholesale electricity market and expansion units.10% was sold under contract sales made by TermoAndes, Vientos Neuquinos, and Vientos Bonaerenses power plants.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Operating performanceforced outages;
exposure to fluctuations of the facilityArgentine peso;
Regulatorychanges in hydrology and environmental policy changeswind resources;
Tariff determination by the OERC


Philippines
timely collection of FONINVEMEM installments and outstanding receivables (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below); and
natural gas prices and availability for contracted generation at Termoandes.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Argentina has one main power system, the SADI, which serves 96% of the country. As of December 31, 2020, the installed capacity of the SADI totaled 41,991 MW. The SADI's installed capacity is composed primarily of thermoelectric generation (61%) and hydroelectric generation (27%), as well as wind (6%), nuclear (4%), and solar (2%).
Thermoelectric generation in the SADI is primarily natural gas. However, scarcity of natural gas during winter periods (June to August) due to transport constraints result in the use of alternative fuels, such as oil and coal. The SADI is also highly reliant on hydroelectric plants. Hydrological conditions impact reservoir water levels and largely influence the dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants and, therefore, influence market structurecosts. Precipitation in Argentina occurs principally from June to August.
The Philippines' powerArgentine regulatory framework divides the electricity sector is divided into generation, transmission, and distribution. The wholesale electric market is comprised of generation companies, transmission companies, distribution companies, and supply.large customers who are permitted to trade electricity. Generation companies can sell


30 | 2020 Annual Report

their output in the spot market or under PPAs. CAMMESA manages the electricity market and supplyis responsible for dispatch coordination. The Electricity National Regulatory Agency is in charge of regulating public service activities and the Secretariat of Energy regulates system framework and grants concessions or authorizations for sector activities. In Argentina, there is a tolling scheme in which the regulator establishes prices for electricity and defines fuel reference prices. As a result, our businesses are open and competitive sectors, while transmission and distribution are regulated sectors. particularly sensitive to changes in regulation.
The ERCArgentine electric market is an independent regulatory body performing administrative"average cost" system. Generators are compensated for fixed costs and other functionsnon-fuel variable costs, under prices denominated in Argentine pesos. CAMMESA is in charge of providing the natural gas and liquid fuels required by the generation companies, except for coal.
During 2020, the electric industry.
The Philippine power market is divided into three grids representinggovernment has maintained prices to the three major island groups, Luzon, Visayasend user, increasing subsidies and Mindanao. Luzon, which includes Manila, the country's largest island, has limited interconnection with Visayas, and represents 86%system deficit. By December 2020, distribution companies recovered an average 55% of the total demandcost of both regions. Luzonthe system.
AES Argentina contributed certain accounts receivable to fund the construction of new power plants under FONINVEMEM agreements. These receivables accrue interest and Visayashave been collected in monthly installments over 10 years after commercial operation date of the related plant took place. AES Argentina participated in the construction of three power plants under the FONINVEMEM structure, and in addition to the repayment of the accounts receivable contributed, AES Argentina will receive a pro rata ownership interest in each of these plants once the accounts receivables have been fully repaid. FONINVEMEM I and II installments were fully repaid in the first quarter of 2020 and the ownership interests in Termoeléctrica San Martín and Termoeléctrica Manuel Belgrano power plants are subject to agreement between the government and all generators that participated in the funds. FONINVEMEM III installments, related to Termoeléctrica Guillermo Brown which commenced operations in April 2016, are still being collected. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity—Long-Term Receivables and Note 7.Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-Kfor further discussion of receivables in Argentina.
In 2019 and 2020, the Argentine peso devalued against the USD by approximately 37% and 29%, respectively, and Argentina’s economy continued to be highly inflationary. Since September 2019, currency controls have been established to govern the devaluation of the Argentine peso and keep Argentine central bank reserves at acceptable levels for the next government of Argentina.
Development Strategy — Currently, 800 MW of renewable greenfield projects are in early and mid stages of development. These projects could be used to participate in future private PPAs or public auctions. In addition, "behind the meter” and off-grid solutions are being developed for the industrial sector (mining), including solar power plants plus BESS.
Brazil
Business Description — AES Brasil (the business formerly branded as AES Tietê) has a portfolio of 12 hydroelectric power plants in the state of São Paulo with total installed capacity of 2,658 MW. These hydroelectric plants operate under a 30-year concession expiring in 2029.
Over the past three years, AES Brasil acquired and developed two solar power complexes in the state of São Paulo, which are fully contracted with 20-year PPAs and together haveaccount for 294 MW of installed capacity. AES Brasil represents approximately 12% of the total generation capacity in the state of São Paulo.
AES Brasil also owns Alto Sertão II, a wind complex located in the state of Bahia with an installed capacity of approximately 18 GW. For Luzon,386 MW and subject to 20-year PPAs expiring between 2033 and 2035, and in December 2020, also acquired the largestVentus wind complex located in the State of Rio Grande do Norte with an installed capacity of 187 MW and subject to a 20-year PPA expiring in 2032.
In the second half of 2020, AES acquired an additional 19.8% ownership in AES Brasil. As of December 31, 2020, AES owns 44% of AES Brasil and is the controlling shareholder and manages and consolidates this business. As a result of the transaction, AES has also committed to transition the listing of AES Brasil's shares to the Novo Mercado, a listing segment of the Brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance. The transition to Novo Mercado is expected to occur in the first half of 2021.
In December 2020, AES Brasil entered into an agreement for the acquisition of the MS Wind and Santos Wind Complexes, located in the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará, respectively. The complexes have been


31 | 2020 Annual Report

operational since 2013 with 159 MW of installed capacity, fully sold in the regulated market for 20 years.
AES Brasil aims to contract most of its physical guarantee requirements and sell the remaining portion in the spot market. The commercial strategy is reassessed periodically according to changes in market conditions, hydrology, and other factors. AES Brasil generally sells available energy through medium-term bilateral contracts.
Key Financial Drivers — The electricity market in Brazil is highly dependent on hydroelectric generation, sourcestherefore electricity pricing is driven by hydrology. Plant availability is also a significant financial driver as in times of high hydrology, AES is more exposed to the spot market. AES Brasil's financial results are 50% coaldriven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
hydrology, impacting quantity of energy generated in the MRE (see Regulatory Framework and 29% natural gas.Market Structure below for further information);
The salegrowth in demand for energy;
market price risk when re-contracting;
asset management;
cost management; and
ability to execute on its growth strategy.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — In Brazil, the Ministry of power is conducted primarilyMines and Energy determines the maximum amount of energy a generation plant can sell, called physical guarantee, representing the long-term average expected energy production of the plant. Under current rules, physical guarantee energy can be sold to distribution companies through medium-long-term regulated auctions or long-termunder unregulated bilateral contracts betweenwith large consumers or energy trading companies.
Brazil has installed capacity of 176 GW, composed of hydroelectric (62%), thermoelectric (25%), renewable (12%), and nuclear (1%) sources. Operation is centralized and controlled by the national operator, ONS, and regulated by the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency ("ANEEL"). The ONS dispatches generators based on their marginal cost of production and on the risk of system rationing. Key variables for the dispatch decision are forecasted hydrological conditions, reservoir levels, electricity demand, fuel prices, and thermal generation companiesavailability.
In case of unfavorable hydrology, the ONS will reduce hydroelectric dispatch to preserve reservoir levels and distribution utilities whichincrease dispatch of thermal plants to meet demand. The consequences of unfavorable hydrology are (i) higher energy spot prices due to higher energy production costs by thermal plants and (ii) the need for hydro plants to purchase energy in the spot market to fulfill their contractual obligations.
A mechanism known as the MRE was created under ONS to share hydrological risk across MRE hydro generators by using a generation scaling factor ("GSF") to adjust generators' physical guarantee during periods of hydrological scarcity. If the hydro plants generate less than the total MRE physical guarantee, the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market. When total hydro generation is higher than the total MRE physical guarantee, the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they may sell the excess energy on the spot market.
In September 2020, Law 14.052/2020 published by ANEEL was approved by the ERC. Distribution utilities and electric cooperatives are allowedPresident, establishing terms for compensation to pass onMRE hydro generators for the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 to their end-users the bilateral contract rates, including WESM purchases, as approved2018, which resulted in higher charges assessed to MRE hydro generators by the ERC.regulator. Under the law, potential compensation will be in the form of an offer for a concession extension for each hydro generator in exchange for full payment of billed GSF trade payables, the amount of which will be reduced in conjunction with the payment for a concession extension. See Key Trends and UncertaintiesRegulatory in Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-K.
Business Description Development Strategy — AES Brasil's strategy is to grow by adding renewable capacity to its generation platform through acquisition or greenfield projects, to focus on client satisfaction and innovation to offer new products and energy solutions, and to be recognized for excellence in asset management.
In 2020, AES Brasil acquired the Tucano Project, a 582 MW greenfield wind power project in the state of Bahia, for which construction is scheduled to start in 2021 and when completed, will supply long-term PPAs. The first phase (155 MW) will be developed in 2021 through a joint venture with Unipar Carbocloro for a 20-year PPA starting in 2022. The second phase (167 MW) will be 100% developed by AES Brasil in 2021, for a 15-year PPA with Anglo American starting in 2022. AES Brasil is seeking other long-term PPAs to fulfill the remaining 260 MW.


32 | 2020 Annual Report

In March 2020, AES Brasil signed two purchase option agreements for a total installed capacity up to 1,100 MW of Cajuína greenfield wind power project in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, which are being exercised as the company secures long-term PPAs. In August 2020, AES Brasil signed a Shareholder Purchase Agreement ("SPA") for the first phase, Santa Tereza, which has installed capacity of 420 MW. Closing is expected to occur in the first quarter of 2021. A Memorandum of Understanding was signed with Ferbasa for 80 MW energy supply over a period of 20 years, beginning in 2024. The SPA for the second phase, São Ricardo, which has installed capacity of 437 MW, was signed in February 2021. AES Brasil is seeking other long-term PPAs to fulfill the remaining 777 MW in phases 1 and 2.
Under the current terms of the 2018 legal agreement in connection with AES Brasil's concession with the state government, AES Brasil is required to increase its capacity in the state of São Paulo by an additional 81 MW by October 2024.


33 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g9.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.



34 | 2020 Annual Report

MCAC SBU
Our MCAC SBU has a portfolio of generation facilities, including renewable energy, in three countries, with a total capacity of 3,459 MW.
Generation — The Masinloc plant isfollowing table lists our MCAC SBU generation facilities:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
DPP (Los Mina)Dominican RepublicGas358 85 %19962022Andres, CDEEE, Non-Regulated Users
Andres (1)
Dominican RepublicGas319 85 %20032022Ede Norte, Ede Este, Ede Sur, Non-Regulated Users
Itabo (2)
Dominican RepublicCoal260 43 %20002022Ede Norte, Ede Este, Ede Sur, Non-Regulated Users
Andres ESDominican RepublicEnergy Storage10 85 %2017
Los Mina DPP ESDominican RepublicEnergy Storage10 85 %2017
Dominican Republic Subtotal957 
Merida IIIMexicoGas/Diesel505 75 %20002025Comision Federal de Electricidad
Mesa La Paz (3)
MexicoWind306 50 %20192045Fuentes de Energia Peñoles
Termoelectrica del Golfo (TEG)MexicoPet Coke275 99 %20072027CEMEX
Termoelectrica del Penoles (TEP)MexicoPet Coke275 99 %20072027Peñoles
Mexico Subtotal1,361 
Colon (4)
PanamaGas381 50 %20182028ENSA, Edemet, Edechi
BayanoPanamaHydro260 49 %19992030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
ChanguinolaPanamaHydro223 90 %20112030AES Panama
Chiriqui-EstiPanamaHydro120 49 %20032030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Penonome IPanamaWind55 49 %20202023Altenergy
Chiriqui-Los VallesPanamaHydro54 49 %19992030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Chiriqui-La EstrellaPanamaHydro48 49 %19992030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Panama Subtotal1,141 
3,459 
_____________________________
(1)Plant also includes an adjacent regasification facility, as well as a 630 MW gross coal-fired plant located in Zambales, Philippines, is interconnected to the Luzon Grid, and is 51% owned by AES. More than 95% of Masinloc's current peak capacity is contracted through bilateral contracts. 430 MW is contracted with Meralco, the largest distribution company in the Philippines, under a PPA expiring in 2019. Following an ERC Order limiting power supply agreement extensions to one year, a supplemental PPA extending the contract with Meralco an additional three years was submitted for approval with the ERC. Masinloc's remaining contracts on existing units expire between 2018 and 2026. Masinloc has been granted a retail electricity supplier license from the ERC and currently markets power to contestable customers. Unlike Masinloc's contracts with distribution utilities, it's contract with contestable customers do not require ERC approval to be implemented. On December 17, 2017, the Company entered70 TBTU LNG storage tank.
(2)Entered into an agreement to sell its Masinloc business. Closing43% interest in the Itabo facility in June 2020.
(3)Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.
(4)Plant also includes an adjacent regasification facility, as well as an 80 TBTU LNG storage tank.
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the MCAC SBU:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
BayasolDominican RepublicSolar50 85 %1H 2021
Itabo Energy StorageDominican RepublicEnergy Storage43 %2H 2021
Dominican Republic Subtotal (1)
57 
Pese SolarPanamaSolar10 49 %1H 2021
Mayorca SolarPanamaSolar10 49 %1H 2021
5B Costa NortePanamaSolar100 %1H 2021
Panama Subtotal21 
78 
_____________________________
(1)A second 50 TBTU LNG storage tank is under construction and expected duringto come on-line in the first half of 2018 subject to certain regulatory approvals.2023.
Construction and Development


35 | 2020 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our MCAC facilities:
MCAC Businesses
aes-20201231_g10.jpg
Dominican Republic
Business Description — AES Dominicana consists of three operating subsidiaries: Itabo, Andres, and Los Mina. With a total of 957 MW of installed capacity, AES provides 19% of the country's capacity and supplies approximately 29% of the country's energy demand via these generation facilities. 873 MW is constructingpredominantly contracted until 2022 with government-owned distribution companies and large customers.
AES has a 335strategic partnership with the Estrella and Linda Groups ("Estrella-Linda"), a consortium of two leading Dominican industrial groups that manage a diversified business portfolio.
Itabo is 42.5% owned by AES. Itabo owns and operates two thermal power generation units with a total of 260 MW gross unit expansionof installed capacity. On June 29, 2020, AES executed a sale and purchase agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in Itabo. In February 2021, the Masinloc plant. The total capitalized cost assale was approved by the Superintendence of December 31, 2017 is $394 million. The expansion unit is included in the Masinloc facilities to be sold as announced in December. The saleElectricity and is expected to close in the first halfquarter of 2018.2021.
Andres and Los Mina are owned 85% by AES. Andres owns and operates a combined cycle natural gas turbine and an energy storage facility with combined generation capacity of 329 MW, as well as the only LNG import terminal in the country, with 160,000 cubic meters of storage capacity. Los Mina owns and operates a combined cycle with two natural gas turbines and an energy storage facility with combined generation capacity of 368 MW.
AES Dominicana has a long-term LNG purchase contract through 2023 for 33.6 trillion btu/year with a price linked to NYMEX Henry Hub. The LNG contract terms allow delivery to various markets in Latin America. These plants capitalize on the competitively-priced LNG contract by selling power where the market is dominated by fuel oil-based generation. Andres has a long-term contract to sell regasified LNG to industrial users within the Dominican Republic using compression technology to transport it within the country, thereby capturing demand from industrial and commercial customers.


36 | 2020 Annual Report

Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
Operating performancechanges in spot prices due to fluctuations in commodity prices (since fuel is a pass-through cost under the PPAs, any variation in oil prices will impact spot sales for both Andres and Itabo);
contracting levels and the extent of capacity awarded; and
growth in domestic natural gas demand, supported by new infrastructure such as the facilityEastern Pipeline and second LNG tank.
Demand from contracted customers
Whole sale electricity price in the market
Vietnam
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Dominican Republic energy market is a decentralized industry consisting of generation, transmission, and distribution businesses. Generation companies can earn revenue through short- and long-term PPAs, ancillary services, and a competitive wholesale generation market. All generation, transmission, and distribution companies are subject to and regulated by the General Electricity Law.
Two main agencies are responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law:
The National Energy Commission drafts and coordinates the legal framework and regulatory legislation. They propose and adopt policies and procedures to implement best practices, support the proper functioning and development of the energy sector, and promote investment.
The Superintendence of Electricity's main responsibilities include monitoring compliance with legal provisions, rules, and technical procedures governing generation, transmission, distribution, and commercialization of electricity. They monitor behavior in the electricity market in order to prevent monopolistic practices.
In addition to the two agencies responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law, the Ministry of Industry and Commerce supervises commercial and industrial activities in the Dominican Republic as well as the fuels and natural gas commercialization to end users.
The Dominican Republic has one main interconnected system with 4,921 MW of installed capacity, composed of thermal (75%), hydroelectric (13%), wind (8%), and solar (4%).
Development Strategy — AES will continue to develop the commercialization of natural gas and incorporate partners directly in gas infrastructure projects. AES partnered with Energas in a joint venture which has been operating the 50 km Eastern Pipeline since February 2020. The joint venture is also developing a new LNG facility of 120,000 cubic meters, including additional storage, regasification, and truck loading capacity, for which construction is scheduled to start in 2021. This will allow AES to reach new customers who have converted, or are in the process of converting, to natural gas as a fuel source, and better operational flexibility.
Panama
Business Description — AES owns and operates five hydroelectric plants totaling 705 MW of generation capacity, a natural gas-fired power plant with 381 MW of generation capacity, and a wind farm of 55 MW, which collectively represent 30% of the total installed capacity in Panama. Furthermore, AES operates an LNG regasification facility, a 180,000 cubic meter storage tank, and a truck loading facility which reached commercial operations in December 2020.
The majority of our hydroelectric plants in Panama are based on run-of-the-river technology, with the exception of the 260 MW Bayano plant. Hydrological conditions have an important influence on profitability. Variations in hydrology can result in an excess or a shortfall in energy production relative to our contractual obligations. Hydro generation is generally in a shortfall position during the dry season from January through May, which is offset by thermal generation since its behavior is opposite and complementary to hydro generation.
Our hydro and thermal assets are mainly contracted through medium to long-term PPAs with distribution companies. A small volume of our hydro plants are contracted with unregulated users. Our hydro assets in Panama have PPAs with distribution companies expiring in December 2030 for a total contracted capacity of 383 MW. Our thermal asset in Panama has PPAs with distribution companies for a total contracted capacity of 350 MW expiring in August 2028.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
changes in hydrology, which impacts commodity prices and exposes the business to variability in the cost of replacement power;
fluctuations in commodity prices, mainly oil and natural gas, which affect the cost of thermal generation and spot prices;


37 | 2020 Annual Report

constraints imposed by the capacity of transmission lines connecting the west side of the country with the load, keeping surplus power trapped during the rainy season; and
country demand as GDP growth is expected to remain strong over the short and medium term.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Panamanian power sector is composed of three distinct operating business units: generation, distribution, and transmission. Generators can enter into short-term and long-term PPAs with distributors or unregulated consumers. In addition, generators can enter into alternative supply contracts with each other. Outside of PPAs, generators may buy and sell energy in the short-term market. Generators can only contract up to their firm capacity.
Three main agencies are responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law:
The National Secretary of Energy in Panama (SNE) has the responsibilities of planning, supervising, and controlling policies of the energy sector within Panama. The SNE proposes laws and regulations to the executive agencies that regulate the procurement of energy and hydrocarbons for the country.
The regulator of public services, known as the ASEP, is an autonomous agency of the government. ASEP is responsible for the control and oversight of public services, including electricity, the transmission and distribution of natural gas utilities, and the companies that provide such services.
The National Dispatch Center (CND) implements the economic dispatch of electricity in the wholesale market. The National Dispatch Center's objectives are to minimize the total cost of generation and maintain the reliability and security of the electric power system. Short-term power prices are determined on an hourly basis by the last dispatched generating unit. Physical generation of energy is determined by the National Dispatch Center regardless of contractual arrangements.
Panama's current total installed capacity is 3,854 MW, composed of hydroelectric (47%), thermal (41%), wind (7%), and solar (5%) generation.
Development Strategy — Given our LNG facility’s excess capacity in Panama, the company will develop natural gas supply solutions for third parties such as power generators and industrial and commercial customers. This strategy will support a growing demand for natural gas in the region and will contribute to AES' mission by reducing carbon dioxide emissions as a result of using LNG.
In addition to investing in LNG infrastructure, AES is investing in renewable projects within the region. This will increase complementary non-hydro renewable assets in the system and contribute to the reduction of hydrological risk in Panama.
Mexico
Business Description — AES has 1,361 MW of installed capacity in Mexico. The TEG and TEP pet coke-fired plants, located in Tamuin, San Luis Potosi, supply power to their offtakers under long-term PPAs expiring in 2027 with a 90% availability guarantee. TEG and TEP secure their fuel under a long-term contract.
Merida is a CCGT located on Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. Merida sells power to the CFE under a capacity and energy based long-term PPA through 2025. Additionally, the plant purchases natural gas and diesel fuel under a long-term contract with one of the CFE’s subsidiaries, the cost of which is then passed through to the CFE under the terms of the PPA.
Mesa La Paz, a 306 MW wind project developed under a joint venture with Grupo Bal, achieved commercial operations in December 2019. Starting in April 2020, Mesa La Paz sells power under a long-term PPA expiring in 2045.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
fully contracting the companies, providing additional benefits from improved operational performance, including performance incentives and/or excess energy sales; and
changes in the methodology to calculate spot energy prices or Locational Marginal Prices, which impacts the excess energy sales to the CFE (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below) in (i) TEG and TEP under self-supply scheme, and (ii) Mesa La Paz under the New Market Rules.


38 | 2020 Annual Report

Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Mexico´s main electrical system is called the National Interconnected System (SIN), which geographically covers an area from Puerto Peñasco, Sonora to Cozumel, Quintana Roo. Mexico also has three isolated electrical systems: (1) the Baja California Interconnected System, which is interconnected with the WECC; (2) the Baja California Sur Interconnected System; and (3) the Mulegé Interconnected System, a very small electrical system. All three are isolated from the SIN and from each other. The Mexican power industry comprises the activities of generation, transmission, distribution, and commercialization segments, considering transmission and distribution to be exclusive state services.
In addition to the Ministry of Energy, three main agencies are responsible for regulating the market agents and their activities, monitoring compliance with the Electric Industry Law and the Market Rules, and the surveillance of operational compliance and management of the wholesale electricity market:
The Energy Regulatory Commission is responsible for the establishment of directives, orders, methodologies, and standards to regulate the electric and fuel markets, as well as granting permits.
The National Center for Energy Control, as an ISO, is responsible for managing the wholesale electricity market, transmission and distribution infrastructure, planning network developments, guaranteeing open access to network infrastructure, executing competitive mechanisms to cover regulated demand, and setting transmission charges.
The Electricity Federal Commission (CFE) owns the transmission and distribution grids and is also the country's basic supplier. CFE is the offtaker for IPP generators, and together with its own power units has more than 50% of the current generation market share.
Mexico has an installed capacity totaling 86 GW with a generation mix composed of thermal (65%), hydroelectric (15%), wind (8%), solar (7%), and other fuel sources (5%).
Development Strategy — AES has partnered with Grupo Bal in a joint venture to co-invest in power and related infrastructure projects in Mexico, focusing on renewable and natural gas generation.


39 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g11.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.



40 | 2020 Annual Report

Eurasia SBU
Generation — Our Eurasia SBU has generation facilities in five countries with total operating installed capacity of 2,791 MW. The following table lists our Eurasia SBU generation facilities:
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
MaritzaBulgariaCoal690 100 %20112026NEK
St. NikolaBulgariaWind156 89 %20102025Electricity Security Fund
Bulgaria Subtotal846 
Delhi ESIndiaEnergy Storage10 60 %2019
India Subtotal10 
Amman East (1)
JordanGas381 37 %20092033National Electric Power Company
IPP4 (1)
JordanHeavy Fuel Oil250 36 %20142039National Electric Power Company
AM SolarJordanSolar52 36 %20192039National Electric Power Company
Jordan Subtotal683 
Netherlands ESNetherlandsEnergy Storage10 100 %2015
Netherlands Subtotal10 
Mong Duong 2 (2)
VietnamCoal1,242 51 %20152040EVN
Vietnam Subtotal1,242 
2,791 
_____________________________
(1)Entered into an agreement to sell 26% interest in these businesses in November 2020.
(2)Entered into an agreement to sell our entire interest in the Mong Duong 2 plant in December 2020.

In December 2020, the Company completed the sale of its entire 49% equity interest in the OPGC coal-fired generation facilities in India.


41 | 2020 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our Eurasia facilities:
Eurasia Businesses
aes-20201231_g12.jpg
Vietnam
Business Description — Mong Duong 2 is a 1,242 MW gross coal-fired plant located in the Quang Ninh Province of Vietnam and was constructed under a BOT service concession agreement expiring in 2040. This is the first and largest coal-fired BOT plant using pulverized coal-fired boiler technology in Vietnam. The BOT company has a PPA with EVN and a Coal Supply Agreement with Vinacomin, both expiring in 2040.
On December 31, 2020, AES executed an agreement to sell its entire 51% interest in the Mong Duong 2 plant. The sale is expected to close in late 2021 or early 2022, subject to customary approvals, including from the Government of Vietnam and the minority partners in Mong Duong 2.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to, the operating performance and availability of the facility.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Ministry of Industry and Trade in Vietnam is primarily responsible for formulating a program to restructure the power industry, developing the electricity market, and promulgating electricity market regulations. The fuel supply is owned by the government through Vinacomin, a state ownedstate-owned entity, and Petro Vietnam.PetroVietnam.
The Vietnam power market is divided into three regions (North, Central, and South), with total installed capacity of approximately 4554 GW. The fuel mix in Vietnam is composed primarily of hydropower at 35%37% and coal at 37%36%. EVN, the national utility, owns 57%53% of installed generation capacity.
The government is in the process of realigning EVN-owned companies into three different independent operations in order to create a competitive power market. A competitive electricity market has already been established. A pilot competitive wholesale electricity marketThe first stage of this realignment was the implementation of the Competitive Electricity Market, which has been developed,in operation since 2012. The second stage was the introduction of the Electricity Wholesale Market, which has been in operation since the beginning of 2019. The third and will be implemented overfinal stage impacts the next five years. The retail marketElectricity Retail Market, which will undergo similar reforms after 2022. BOT power


42 | 2020 Annual Report

plants will not directly participate in the power market; alternatively, thea single buyer will bid the tariff on the power pool on their behalf.
Development Strategy — In Vietnam, we continue to advance the development of our Son My LNG terminal project, which has a design capacity of up to 9.6 million metric tonnes per annum, and the Son My 2 CCGT project, which has a capacity of about 2,250 MW. In October 2019, we received formal approval as a government-mandated investor in the Son My LNG terminal project in partnership with PetroVietnam Gas and in October 2020, we signed the term sheet agreement with PetroVietnam Gas for the joint venture agreement. In September 2019, we received formal approval as the government-mandated investor with 100% equity ownership in the Son My 2 CCGT project and executed a statutory memorandum of understanding with Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade in November 2019 to continue developing the Son My 2 CCGT project under Vietnam’s Build-Operate-Transfer legal framework. The Son My 2 CCGT project will utilize the Son My LNG terminal project and be its anchor customer.
Bulgaria
Business DescriptionMong Duong IIOur AES Maritza plant is a 1,240690 MW gross coal-fired plant located in Quang Ninh Province of Vietnamlignite fuel thermal power plant. AES Maritza's entire power output is contracted with NEK, the state-owned public electricity supplier, independent energy producer, and was constructedtrading company. Maritza is contracted under a BOT service concession agreement expiring15-year PPA that expires in 2040. ThisMay 2026. AES Maritza has been collecting receivables from NEK in a timely manner since 2016. However, NEK's liquidity position remains subject to political conditions and regulatory changes in Bulgaria.
The DG Comp is the first and largest coal-fired BOT plant using pulverized coal fired boiler technology in Vietnam. The BOT company has areviewing NEK’s PPA with EVNAES Maritza pursuant to the European Union’s state aid rules. AES Maritza believes that its PPA is legal and a Coal Supply Agreementin compliance with Vinacomin both expiringall applicable laws. For additional details see Key Trends and Uncertainties in 2040.Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-K.
AES also owns an 89% economic interest in the St. Nikola wind farm with 156 MW of installed capacity. The power output of St. Nikola is sold to customers operating on the liberalized electricity market and the plant receives additional revenue per the terms of an October 2018 Contract for Premium with the state-owned Electricity Security Fund.
Key Financial Drivers Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
regulatory changes in the Bulgarian power market;
results of the DG Comp review;
availability and load factor of the operating units;
the level of wind resources for St. Nikola;
spot market price volatility beyond the level of compensation through the Contract for Premium for St. Nikola; and
NEK's ability to meet the payment terms of the PPA contract with Maritza.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The electricity sector in Bulgaria allows both regulated and competitive segments. In its capacity as the public provider of electricity, NEK acts as a single buyer and seller for all regulated transactions on the market. Electricity outside the regulated market trades on one of the platforms of the Independent Bulgarian Electricity Exchange day-ahead market, intra-day market, or bilateral contracts market. Bulgaria is working with the European Commission on the implementation of a model that allows for a gradual phase-out of regulated energy prices.
Bulgaria’s power sector is supported by a diverse generation mix, universal access to the operating performancegrid, and availabilitynumerous cross-border connections with neighboring countries. In addition, it plays an important role in the energy balance in the Balkan region.
Bulgaria has 13 GW of installed capacity enabling the country to meet and exceed domestic demand and export energy. Installed capacity is primarily thermal (45%), hydro (25%), and nuclear (16%).
Environmental Regulation — In 2017, new EU environmental standards were enacted that regulate emissions from the combustion of solid fuels for large combustion plants, known as the Best Available Techniques Reference Document for Large Combustion Plants, which applies to AES Maritza. AES Maritza was granted a derogation with respect to these standards and a formal decision for the preliminary execution of that derogation was made by the Bulgarian environmental authorities in February 2021. A third-party appeal with respect to the derogation has been


43 | 2020 Annual Report

made; however, while such appeal is considered, the preliminary execution of that derogation is in full force and effect.
In December 2019, the EU approved the European Green New Deal, a framework document that sets out how to make Europe climate-neutral by 2050. In response, in October 2020, Bulgaria submitted an updated version of the facility.


Financial Data by Country
See the table with our consolidated operations for eachIntegrated Energy and Climate Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria 2021-2030 ("IECP"), with national targets to contribute to the EU decarbonization targets, which does not include specific commitments to phase out coal plants before 2030. The IECP emphasizes the socio-economic importance of the indigenous coal industry in Bulgaria and the potential for indigenous coal to provide resources for electricity generation in the next 60 years while contributing to Bulgaria's energy and national security. There are currently no EU or Bulgarian regulations that limit the ability of AES Maritza to operate.
Jordan
Business Description — In Jordan, AES has a 37% controlling interest in Amman East, a 381 MW oil/gas-fired plant fully contracted with the national utility under a 25-year PPA expiring in 2033, a 36% controlling interest in the IPP4 plant, a 250 MW oil/gas-fired peaker plant fully contracted with the national utility until 2039, and a 36% controlling interest in a 52 MW solar plant fully contracted with the national utility under a 20-year PPA expiring in 2039. We consolidate the results in our operations as we have a controlling interest in these businesses.
On November 10, 2020, AES executed a sale and purchase agreement to sell approximately 26% effective ownership interest in both the Amman East and IPP4 plants. The sale is expected to close in the first half of 2021 subject to customary approvals, including lender consents.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Jordan electricity transmission market is a single-buyer model with the state-owned National Electric Power Company ("NEPCO") responsible for transmission. NEPCO generally enters into long-term PPAs with IPPs to fulfill energy procurement requests from distribution utilities. The sector is prioritizing renewable energy development, with 2,400 MW of renewable energy installed capacity expected by the end of 2021, 2,129 MW of which is already connected to the grid.
India
Development Strategy India is a high-growth market for renewables and battery energy storage. AES owns and operates a test 10 MW BESS in Delhi city, located inside a substation of Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited ("TPDDL"). The BESS is integrated with the TPDDL distribution system and provides various frequency regulation services. Discussions of the commercial opportunities with TPDDL are ongoing. Leveraging the Delhi BESS experience, we are approaching similar use case opportunities with other customers in India.



44 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g13.jpg
Other Investments
Fluence and Uplight are unconsolidated entities and their results are reported as Net equity in earnings of affiliates on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. 5B is a cost method investment and AES will record income only when it receives dividends from 5B.
Fluence
Business Description — Fluence, AES' joint venture with Siemens, is a global energy storage technology and services company aligned with the AES strategy of becoming less carbon intensive. Fluence represents the combination of two global leaders in utility-scale, battery-based energy storage, bringing together the AES Advancion and Siemens Siestorage platforms, the capabilities and expertise of the two partners, and the global sales presence of Siemens.
In December 2020, Fluence entered into an agreement with the QIA whereby QIA will invest $125 million in Fluence. Following the completion of the transaction, which is expected in the second quarter of 2021, AES and Siemens are expected to each own approximately 44% of Fluence.
Key Financial Drivers — Fluence's financial results are driven by the growth in its product revenue and an efficient cost structure that is expected to benefit from increased scale. Fluence’s pipeline of potential projects is global, with approximately 50% being located outside the U.S.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The grid-connected energy storage sector is expanding rapidly with over 5 GW of projects publicly announced in 2020. By incorporating energy storage across the electric power network, utilities and communities around the world will optimize their infrastructure investments, increase network flexibility and resiliency, and accelerate cost-effective integration of renewable electricity generation. Fluence is positioned to be a leading participant in this growth, accounting for approximately 15% of the storage market across their target markets in 2020.


45 | 2020 Annual Report

Uplight
Business Description — The Company holds an equity interest in Uplight as part of its digitization and growth strategy. Uplight offers a comprehensive digital platform for utility customer engagement. Uplight provides software and services to approximately 80 of the world’s leading electric and gas utilities, principally in the U.S., with the mission of motivating and enabling energy users and providers to transition to a clean energy ecosystem. Uplight's solutions form a unified, end-to-end customer energy experience system that delivers innovative energy efficiency, demand response, and clean energy solutions quickly. Utility and energy company leaders rely on Uplight and its customer-focused digital energy experiences to improve customer satisfaction, reduce service costs, increase revenue, and reduce carbon emissions.
Key Financial Drivers — Uplight's financial results are driven by the rate of growth of new customers and the extension of additional services to existing customers. Revenue growth primarily drives its financial results, given the relative significance of fixed operating costs.
Development Strategy — AES' collaboration with Uplight is designed to create value for Uplight, AES and their respective customers. IPL and DP&L have implemented Uplight's consumer engagement solutions in support of energy efficiency and demand response programs. AES and Uplight are now working together to develop mobile-enabled engagement, e-mobility and advanced consumer and industrial offerings, with plans for future deployment of the Uplight platform in Latin America.
5B
Business Description — The Company made a strategic investment in 5B, a solar technology innovator with the mission to accelerate the transformation of the world to a clean energy future. 5B's technology design enables solar projects to be installed up to three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016times faster, while allowing for up to two times more energy within the same footprint as traditional plants.
Key Financial Drivers — 5B is a cost method investment and 2015,AES will record income only when it receives dividends from 5B. 5B is in the beginning of its growth mode and property, plantis expanding its ecosystem for global reach.
Development Strategy — In addition to a large global market for third party projects, we believe there is an addressable market of nearly 5 GW across our development pipeline. AES expects to utilize this technology in conjunction with ongoing automation and equipment asdigital initiatives to speed up delivery time and lower costs. 5B technology has been deployed at a 2 MW AES project in Panama and is expected to be deployed at a portion of December 31, 2017 and 2016, by country,the 180 MW Andes Solar 2b project to be constructed in Note 15 — Segment and Geographic Information included in Item 8.— Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.Chile.
Environmental and Land-Use Regulations
The Company faces certain risks and uncertainties related to numerous environmental laws and regulations, including existing and potential GHG legislation or regulations, and actual or potential laws and regulations pertaining to water discharges, waste management (including disposal of coal combustion residuals), and certain air emissions, such as SO2, NOX, PM,particulate matter, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants. Such risks and uncertainties could result in increased capital expenditures or other compliance costs which could have a material adverse effect on certain of our U.S. or international subsidiaries, and our consolidated results of operations. For further information about these risks, see Item 1A.—Risk FactorsOur operations are subject to significant government regulation and could be adversely affected by changes in the law or regulatory schemes; Several of our businesses are subject to potentially significant remediation expenses, enforcement initiatives, private party lawsuits and reputational risk associated with CCR; Our businesses are subject to stringent environmental laws, rules and regulations; Our businesses are subject to enforcement initiatives from environmental regulatory agencies; andRegulators, politicians, non-governmental organizations and other private parties have expressed concern Concerns about greenhouse gas, or GHG emissions and the potential risks associated with climate change have led to increased regulation and are takingother actions whichthat could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flowsbusinesses in this Form 10-K. For a discussion of the laws and regulations of individual countries within each SBU where our subsidiaries operate, see discussion within Item 1.—Business of this Form 10-K under the applicable SBUs.
Many of the countries in which the Company does business also have laws and regulations relating to the siting, construction, permitting, ownership, operation, modification, repair and decommissioning of, and power sales from electric power generation or distribution assets. In addition, international projects funded by the International Finance Corporation, the private sector lending arm of the World Bank, or many other international lenders are subject to World Bank environmental standards or similar standards, which tend to be more stringent than local country standards. The Company often has used advanced generation technologies in order to minimize environmental impacts, such as combined fluidized bed boilers and advanced gas turbines, and environmental


46 | 2020 Annual Report

control devices such as flue gas desulphurization for SO2 emissions and selective catalytic reduction for NOx emissions.
Environmental laws and regulations affecting electric power generation and distribution facilities are complex, change frequently, and have become more stringent over time. The Company has incurred and will continue to incur capital costs and other expenditures to comply with these environmental laws and regulations. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Environmental Capital Expenditures in this Form 10-K for more detail. The Company may be required to make significant capital or other expenditures to comply with these regulations. There can be no assurance that the businesses operated by the subsidiaries of the Company will be able to recover any of these compliance costs from their counterparties or customers such that the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows would not be materially affected.
Various licenses, permits, and approvals are required for our operations. Failure to comply with permits or approvals, or with environmental laws, can result in fines, penalties, capital expenditures, interruptions, or changes to our operations. Certain subsidiaries of the Company are subject to litigation or regulatory action relating to environmental permits or approvals. See Item 3.Legal Proceedings in this Form 10-K for more detail with respect to environmental litigation and regulatory action.
United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations
In the U.S.United States, the CAA and various state laws and regulations regulate emissions of air pollutants, including SO2, NOX, PM,particulate matter, GHGs, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants. Certain applicable rules are discussed in further detail below.
CSAPR — CSAPR addresses the "good neighbor" provision of the CAA, which prohibits sources within each state from emitting any air pollutant in an amount which will contribute significantly to any other state’s nonattainment, or interference with maintenance of, any NAAQS. The CSAPR required significant reductions in SO2 and NOX emissions from power plants in many states in which subsidiaries of the Company operate. The Company is required to comply with the CSAPR in several states, including Ohio, Indiana, Oklahoma and Maryland. The CSAPR is implemented, in part, through a market-based program under which compliance may be achievable


through the acquisition and use of emissions allowances created by the EPA. The Company complies with CSAPR through operation of existing controls and purchases of allowances on the open market, as needed.
On October 26, 2016, the EPA published a final rule to update the CSAPR to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS ("CSAPR Update Rule"). The CSAPR Update Rule finds that NOxX ozone season emissions in 22 states (including Indiana, Maryland, Ohio and Oklahoma)Ohio) affect the ability of downwind states to attain and maintain the 2008 ozone NAAQS, and, accordingly, the EPA issued federal implementation plans that both updated existing CSAPR NOxX ozone season emission budgets for electric generating units within these states and implemented these budgets through modifications to the CSAPR NOxX ozone season allowance trading program. Implementation started in the 2017 ozone season (May-September 2017). Affected facilities began to receive fewer ozone season NOxX allowances in 2017, resulting in the need to purchase additional allowances. Additionally, on September 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit remanded a portion of the CSAPR Update Rule to the EPA. On October 30, 2020, the EPA issued a proposed rule addressing 21 states’ (including Maryland and Indiana) outstanding “good neighbor” obligations with respect of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The proposed rule could result in affected facilities receiving fewer ozone season NOX allowances as soon as the 2021 ozone season. While the Company's 2017additional CSAPR compliance costs wereto date have been immaterial, the future availability of and cost to purchase allowances to meet the emission reduction requirements is uncertain at this time, but it could be material if certain facilities will need to purchase additional allowances based on reduced allocations.
New Source Review ("NSR") — The NSR requirements under the CAA impose certain requirements on major emission sources, such as electric generating stations, if changes are made to the sources that result in a significant increase in air emissions. Certain projects, including power plant modifications, are excluded from these NSR requirements, if they meet the RMRRroutine maintenance, repair and replacement ("RMRR") exclusion of the CAA. There is ongoing uncertainty, and significant litigation, regarding which projects fall within the RMRR exclusion. TheOver the past several years, the EPA has pursued a coordinated compliance and enforcement strategy to address NSR compliance issues at the nation's coal-fired power plants. The strategy has included both the filing offiled suits against coal-fired power plant owners and the issuance ofissued NOVs to a number of power plant owners alleging NSR violations. See Item 3.—Legal Proceedings in this Form 10-K for more detail with respect to environmental litigation and regulatory action, including aan NOV issued by the EPA against IPL concerning NSR and prevention of significant deterioration issues under the CAA.
In 2000, Stuart Station received an NOV from the EPA alleging that certain activities undertaken in the past are outside the scope of the RMRR exclusion. Hutchings Station also received such an NOV in 2009. Additionally, generation units partially owned by AES but operated by other utilities have received such NOVs relating to equipment repairs or replacements alleged to be outside the RMRR exclusion. The NOVs issued to AES-operated plants have not been pursued through litigation by the EPA.
If NSR requirements wereare imposed on any of the power plants owned by the Company's subsidiaries, the results could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. In connection with the imposition of any such NSR requirements on IPL, the utility would seek recovery of any operating or capital expenditures related to air pollution control technology to reduce regulated air emissions, but not fines or penalties; however, there can be no assurances that they would be successful in that regard.


47 | 2020 Annual Report

Regional Haze Rule — The EPA's "Regional Haze Rule" is intended to reduce haze and protect visibility in designated federal areas, and sets guidelines for determining BARTthe best available retrofit technology ("BART") at affected plants and how to demonstrate "reasonable progress" toward eliminating man-made haze by 2064. The Regional Haze Rule required states to consider five factors when establishing BART for sources, including the availability of emission controls, the cost of the controls, and the effect of reducing emission on visibility in Class I areas (including wilderness areas, national parks, and similar areas). The statute requireswould require compliance within five years after the EPA approves the relevant SIP or issues a federal implementation plan, although individual states may impose more stringent compliance schedules.
In September 2017, the EPA published a final rule affirming the continued validity of the EPA's previous determination allowing states to rely on the CSAPR to satisfy BART requirements. All of the Company’s facilities that are subject to BART comply by meeting the requirements of CSAPR.
The second phase of the Regional Haze Rule beginsbegan in 2019 and states2019. States must submit regional haze plans for this second implementation period in 2021 to continue to demonstrate reasonable progress towards reducing visibility impairment in Class I areas. States may need to require additional emissions controls for visibility impairing pollutants, including on BART sources, during the second implementation period. We currently cannot predict the impact of this second implementation period, if any, on any of our Company’s U.S. subsidiaries.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS")NAAQSUnder the CAA, the EPA sets NAAQS for six principal pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment, including ozone, particulate matter, NOxX, and SO2, which result from coal combustion. Areas meeting the NAAQS are designated "attainment areas" while those that do not meet the NAAQS are considered "nonattainment areas." Each state must develop a plan to bring nonattainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS, which may include imposing operating limits on individual plants. The EPA is required to review NAAQS at five-year intervals.


Based on the current and potential future ambient air standards, certain of the states in which the Company's subsidiaries operate have determined or will be required to determine whether certain areas within such states meet the NAAQS. Some of these states may be required to modify their State Implementation Plans to detail how the states will attain or maintain their attainment status. As part of this process, it is possible that the applicable state environmental regulatory agency or the EPA may require reductions of emissions from our generating stations to reach attainment status for ozone, fine particulate matter, NOxX, or SO2. The compliance costs of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries could be material.
On September 30, 2015, IDEM published itsBeginning January 1, 2017, IPL Petersburg has been required to meet reduced SO2 limits established in a final rule establishing reduced SO2 limits for IPL facilitiespublished by IDEM in 2015 in accordance with a new one-hour standardSO2 NAAQS of 75 parts per billion, for the areas in which IPL's Harding Street, Petersburg, and Eagle Valley Generating Stations operate. The compliance date for these requirements was January 1, 2017. No impact is expected for Eagle Valley or Harding Street Generating Stations because these facilities ceased coal combustion prior to the compliance date. However, improvementsbillion. Improvements to the existing FGDflue gas desulfurization systems at IPL’s Petersburg station were required to meet the emission limits imposed by the rule. On April 26, 2017, theThe IURC approved IPL’s request for NAAQS SO2 compliance at its Petersburg generation station with 80% of qualifying costs recovered through a rate adjustment mechanism and the remainder recorded as a regulatory asset for recovery in a subsequent rate case. The approved capital cost of the NAAQS SO2 compliance plan is approximately $29 million. On August 17, 2020, the EPA approved the reduced SO2 limits as part of a revised Indiana State Implementation Plan concluding that Indiana has appropriately demonstrated that the plan provides for attainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions — In January 2011, the EPA began regulating GHG emissions from certain stationary sources, pursuant to two CAA programs: the Title V Operating Permit program and the preconstructionincluding a pre-construction permitting program for certain new construction or major modifications, known as the PSD. Obligations relating to Title V permits include record-keeping and monitoring requirements. Sources subject to PSD can be required to implement BACT. If future modifications to our U.S.-based businesses' sources become subject to PSD for other pollutants, it may trigger GHG BACT requirements. The EPA has issued guidance on what BACT entails for the control of GHGrequirements and has now proposed NSPS for modified and reconstructed units (see below) that will serve as a floor (maximum emission rate) for future BACT requirements. Individual states must determine what controls are required for facilities within their jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis. The ultimate impact of the BACT requirements applicable to us on our operations cannot be determined at this time as our U.S.-based businesses will not be required to implement BACT until one of them constructs a new major source or makes a major modification of an existing major source. However, the cost of compliance couldwith such requirements may be material.
On October 23, 2015, the EPA's rule establishing NSPS for new electric generating units became effective. The NSPS establisheffective, establishing CO2 emissions standards of 1400 lbs/MWh for newly constructed coal-fueled electric generating plants, which reflects the partial capture and storage of CO2 emissions from the plants. The NSPS for large, newly constructed natural gas combined cycle facilities is 1,000 lbs/MWh. These standards apply to any electric generating unit with construction commencing after January 8, 2014. The EPA also promulgated NSPS applicable to modified and reconstructed electric generating units, which will serve as a floor for future BACT determinations for such units. The NSPS applicable to modified and reconstructed coal-fired units will be 1,800 lbs CO2/MWh for sources with heat input greater than 2,000 MMBtu per hour. For smaller sources, below 2,000 MMBtu per hour, the standard is 2,000 lbs CO2/MWh. The NSPS could have an impact on the Company's plans to construct and/or modify or reconstruct electric generating units in some locations.
On December 22,20, 2018, the EPA published proposed revisions to the final NSPS for new, modified, and reconstructed coal-fired electric utility steam generating units proposing that the best system of emissions reduction for these units is highly efficient generation that would be equivalent to supercritical steam conditions for larger units and sub-critical steam conditions for smaller units, and not partial carbon capture and sequestration, as was finalized in the 2015 final NSPS. The EPA did not include revisions for natural-gas combined cycle or simple cycle units in the EPA'sDecember 20, 2018 proposal. Challenges to the GHG NSPS


48 | 2020 Annual Report

are being held in abeyance at this time.
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published in the Federal Register proposed Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Utility Generating Units, known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule. On July 8, 2019, the EPA published the final ACE Rule along with associated revisions to implementing regulations. The final ACE Rule established CO2emission rules for existing power plants under Clean Air ActCAA Section 111(d) (calledand replaced the CPP) alsoEPA's 2015 Clean Power Plan Rule (CPP). In accordance with the ACE Rule, the EPA determined that heat rate improvement measures are the best system of emissions reductions for existing coal-fired electric generating units. The final rule requires states, including Indiana and Maryland, develop a State Plan to establish CO2 emission limits for designated facilities, including IPL Petersburg's and AES Warrior Run's coal-fired electric generating units. States have three years to develop their plans under the rule. On February 19, 2020, Indiana published a First Notice for the Indiana ACE Rule indicating that IDEM intends to determine the best system of emissions reductions and CO2 standards for affected units. Impacts remain largely uncertain because Indiana's State Plan has not yet been developed. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded to the EPA the ACE Rule, although the parties have an opportunity to request a rehearing at the D.C. Circuit or seek a review of the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. The impact of this decision remains uncertain.
On November 4, 2020, the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement became effective. However, on January 20, 2021, President Biden signed and submitted an instrument for the U.S. to rejoin the Paris Agreement effective February 19, 2021. As such, there is some uncertainty with respect to the impact of GHG rules on IPL. The CPP provides for interimGHG BACT requirements will not apply at least until we construct a new major source or make a major modification of an existing major source, and the NSPS will not require us to comply with an emissions performance rates that must be achieved beginning in 2022 and final emissions performance rates that must be achieved starting in 2030. Under the CPP, states are required to meet state-wide emission rate standardsstandard until we construct a new electric generating unit. We do not have any planned major modifications of an existing source or equivalent mass-based standards, with the goal being a 32% reduction in total U.S. power sector emissions from 2005 levels by 2030. The CPP requires states to submit, by 2016, implementation plans to meet the standards orconstruct a request for an extensionnew major source at this time which are expected to 2018. If a state failsbe subject to develop and submit an approvable implementation plan,these regulations. Furthermore, the EPA, will finalize a federal plan for that state. The fullstates, and other utilities are still evaluating potential impacts of the GHG regulations in our industry. In light of these uncertainties, we cannot predict the impact of the CPP would dependEPA’s current and future GHG regulations on the following:our consolidated results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition, but it could be material.
whether and how the states in which the Company's U.S. businesses operate respond to the CPP;
whether the states adopt an emissions trading regime and, if so, which trading regime;
how other states respond to the CPP, which will affect the size and robustness of any emissions trading market; and
how other companies may respond in the face of increased carbon costs.
Several states and industry groups challenged the NSPS for CO2 in the D.C. Circuit. Pursuant to a court order issued in August 2017, the litigation is being held in indefinite abeyance pending further court order.


In addition, several states and industry groups filed petitions in the D.C. Circuit challenging the CPP and requested a stay of the rule while the challenge was considered. The D.C. Circuit denied the stay and granted requests to consider the challenges on an expedited basis. On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued orders staying implementation of the CPP pending resolution of challenges to the rule. On March 28, 2017, the EPA filed a motion in the D.C. Circuit to hold the challenges to both the CPP and the GHG NSPS in abeyance in light of an Executive Order signed the same day. On April 28, 2017, the D.C. Circuit issued orders holding the challenges to both rules in abeyance for 60 days, with subsequent extensions granted by the court. The most recent extension of the CPP litigation was set to expire in January 2018 but, on January 10, 2018, the EPA filed a status report requesting that the court continue to hold the case in abeyance pending the conclusion of further rulemaking on the CPP. On October 16, 2017, the EPA published in the Federal Register a proposed rule that would rescind the CPP. On December 28, 2017, the EPA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to solicit comments as EPA considers a potential rule to establish emission guidelines to replace the CPP and limit GHG emissions from existing electric generating units under Section 111(d) of the CAA. Some states and environmental groups have opposed EPA’s most recent request to continue to hold the CPP appeals in abeyance and the D.C. Circuit has not yet acted upon EPA’s request.
By order of the U.S. Supreme Court, the CPP has been stayed pending resolution of the challenges to the rule. Due to the future uncertainty of the CPP,these regulations and associated litigation, we cannot at this time determine the impact on our operations or consolidated financial results, but we believe the cost to comply with the CPP,ACE Rule, should it be upheld and implemented in its current or a substantially similar form, could be material. The GHG NSPS remains in effect at this time, and, absent further action from the EPA that rescinds or substantively revises the NSPS, it could impact any Company plans to construct and/or modify or reconstruct electric generating units in some locations, which may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The Company will likely not know the answers to the above questions regarding the CPP until later in 2018 or potentially 2019. As the first compliance period would not end until 2025, and because we cannot predict whether the CPP will survive the legal challenges or be repealed or replaced through rulemaking, it is too soon to determine the CPP's potential impact on our business, operations or financial condition, but any such impact could be material.
Cooling Water Intake — The Company's facilities are subject to a variety of rules governing water use and discharge. In particular, the Company's U.S. facilities are subject to the CWA Section 316(b) rule issued by the EPA that seeks to protect fish and other aquatic organisms by requiring existing steam electric generating facilities to utilize the BTAbest technology available ("BTA") for cooling water intake structures. On August 15, 2014, the EPA published its final standards to protect fish and other aquatic organisms drawn into cooling water systems at large power plants and other industrial facilities. These standardsbased on CWA Section 316(b) which require certain subject facilities that utilize at least 25% of the withdrawn water exclusively for cooling purposes and have a design intake flow of greater than two million gallons per day to choose among seven BTA options to reduce fish impingement. In addition, certain facilities that withdraw at least 125 million gallons per day for cooling purposes must conduct studies to assist permitting authorities to determine whether and what site-specific controls, if any, would beare required to reduce entrainment of aquatic organisms. This decision-making process would include public input as part of permit renewal or permit modification. It is possible that this decision-making process, which includes permitting and public input, could result in the need to install closed-cycle cooling systems (closed-cycle cooling towers), or other technology. Finally, the standards require that new units added to an existing facility to increase generation capacity are required to reduce both impingement and entrainment that achieves one of two alternatives under national BTA standards for entrainment. It is not yet possible to predict the total impacts of this recent final rule at this time, including any challenges to such final rule and the outcome of any such challenges. However, if additional capital expenditures are necessary, they could be material.
AES Southland's current plan is to comply with the California State Water Resources Board's ("SWRCB") Statewide Water Quality ControlSWRCB OTC Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling ("OTC Policy") by shutting down and permanently retiring all existing generating units at AES Alamitos, AES Huntington Beach, and AES Redondo Beach that utilize OTC by December 31, 2020, the compliance datedates included in the OTC Policy. New air-cooled combined cycle gas turbine generators and battery energy storage systems will be constructed at the AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach generating stations, and there is currently no plan to replace the OTC generating units at the AES Redondo Beach generating station. The execution of the implementation plan for compliance with the SWRCB's OTC Policy is entirely dependent on the Company's ability to execute on long-term power purchase agreementsPPAs to support project financing of the replacement generating units at AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach. The SWRCB is currently reviewingreviews the implementation plan and latest information on OTC generating unit retirement dates and new generation availability to evaluate the impact on electrical system reliability which could result in the extension ofand OTC compliance dates for specific units. 


49 | 2020 Annual Report

The Company’s California subsidiaries have signed 20-year term power purchase agreementsPPAs with Southern California


Edison for the new generating capacity, which have been approved by the California Public Utilities Commission. Construction of new generating capacity began in June 2017 at AES Huntington Beach and July 2017 at AES Alamitos. ConstructionThe new air-cooled combined cycle gas turbine generators were constructed at both sites is on schedulethe AES Alamitos and will require the following existingAES Huntington Beach generating stations. Certain OTC units were required to retire earlier than December 31, 2020be retired in 2019 to provide interconnection capacity and/or emissions credits prior to startup of the new generating units:
Redondo Beach Unit 7 - September 30, 2019
Huntington Beach Unit 1 - December 31, 2019
Alamitos Units 1, 2,units, and 6 - December 31, 2019
Thethe remaining AES OTC generating units in California will be shutdown and permanently retired by the OTC Policy compliance dates for these units. On January 23, 2020, the Statewide Advisory Committee on Cooling Water Intake Structures adopted a recommendation to present to the SWRCB to extend the OTC compliance dates for AES Huntington Beach and AES Alamitos until December 31, 2023 and AES Redondo Beach until December 31, 2021. On September 1, 2020, in response to a request by the state’s energy, utility, and grid operators and regulators, the SWRCB approved amendments to its OTC Policy. The SWRCB OTC Policy previously required the shutdown and permanent retirement of all remaining OTC generating units at AES Alamitos, AES Huntington Beach, and AES Redondo Beach by December 31, 2020. The amendment extends the deadline for shutdown and retirement of AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach’s remaining OTC generating units to December 31, 2023 and extends the deadline for shutdown and retirement of AES Redondo Beach’s remaining OTC generating units to December 31, 2021 (the “AES Redondo Beach Extension”). In October 2020, the cities of Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach filed a state court lawsuit challenging the AES Redondo Beach Extension. The outcome of the lawsuit is unclear. The respective facilities’ NPDES permits have been revised to allow the remaining OTC generating units at AES Alamitos, AES Huntington Beach, and AES Redondo Beach to continue operation beyond December 31, 2020 and in accordance with the amended OTC Policy.
Power plants are required to comply with the more stringent of state or federal requirements. At present, the California state requirements are more stringent and have earlier compliance dates than the federal EPA requirements, and are therefore applicable to the Company's California assets.
Challenges to the federal EPA's rule have beenwere filed and consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, although implementation of the rule haswas not been stayed while the challenges proceed.proceeded. On July 23, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the rule. The Second Circuit later denied a petition by environmental groups for rehearing. The Company anticipates once-through cooling andthat compliance with CWA Section 316(b) compliance regulations and associated costs wouldcould have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Water Discharges — On June 29, 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("the agencies") published a final rule defining federal jurisdiction over waters of the U.S. This rule, which initially became effective on August 28, 2015, maycould expand or otherwise change the number and types of waters or features subject to federal permitting. On October 9,However, the agencies engaged in a two-step process to repeal the 2015 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an order to temporarily stay the "Waters of the U.S." rule nationwide while that court determined whetherand replace it had authority to hearwith a newly promulgated rule called the challenges to the"Navigable Waters Protection" rule. The order was in response to challenges broughtagencies completed the first step on October 22, 2019 by 18 states and followed an Augustpublishing the final rule repealing the 2015 court decision in the U.S. District Court of North Dakota to stay the rule in 13 other states. On January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that challenges to the rule must be reviewed in U.S. district courts and remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. That action would lift the nationwide stay of the rule, leaving the stay in place only for those 13 states addressed in the order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota. On January 31, 2018, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced a rule that will delay the effective date of the "Waters of the U.S." rule by two years from the date the rule is published in the Federal Register. On June 27, 2017, the EPA proposed a rule that would rescind the “Waters of the U.S.” rule and re-codifyrule. In step two, the agencies issued a revised definition of “Waterswaters of the United States” that existed prior toU.S. on December 11, 2018 and released the 2015 rule. We cannot predict the outcomeprepublication version of the judicial challengesfinal "Navigable Waters Protection" rule on April 21, 2020. It is too early to determine whether the newly promulgated "Navigable Waters Protection" rule or the regulatory process to rescind the rule, but if the “Waters of the U.S.” rule is ultimately implemented in its current or substantially similar form and survives the legal challenges, it couldmay have a material impact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Certain of the Company's U.S.-based businesses are subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNPDES permits that regulate specific industrial waste water and storm water discharges to the waters of the U.S. under the CWA. On January 7, 2013, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency issued an NPDES permit for J.M. Stuart Station, which included a compliance schedule for performing a study to justify an alternate thermal limitation or take undefined measures to meet certain temperature limits. On February 1, 2013, DPL appealed various aspects of the final permit. As a result of DPL’s decision to retire Stuart generating station, we do not expect a material impact.
On August 28, 2012, the IDEM issued NPDES permits to the IPL Petersburg, Harding Street and Eagle Valley generating stations, which became effective in October 2012. These permitsthat set new water quality-based effluent discharge limits for the IPL Harding Street and Petersburg facilities as well as monitoring and other requirements designed to protect aquatic life, with full compliance ultimately required by October 2015. The extended compliance deadline was September 29, 2017 for IPL's Harding Street and Petersburg facilities through agreed orders with IDEM.2017. The deadline for Petersburg to commission a portion of the treatment system was subsequently extended to April 11, 2018.
On November 3, 2015, the EPA published its final ELG rule to reduce toxic pollutants discharged into waters of the U.S. by steam-electric power plants.plants through technology applications. These effluent limitations for existing and new sources include dry handling of fly ash, closed-loop or dry handling of bottom ash and more stringent effluent limitations for flue gas de-sulfurizationdesulfurization wastewater. The required compliance time linestimelines for existing sources was to be established between November 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023. On September 18, 2017, the EPA published a final rule delaying certain compliance


dates of the ELG rule for two years while it administratively reconsiders the rule. IPL Petersburg has installed a dry bottom ash handling system in response to the CCR rule described belowand wastewater treatment systems in response to the NPDES permits in advance of the ELG compliance date. As a resultOther U.S. businesses already include dry handling of fly ash and bottom ash and do not generate flue gas desulfurization wastewater. On April 12, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded portions of the


50 | 2020 Annual Report

EPA's 2015 ELG Rule related to legacy wastewaters and combustions residual leachate. On October 13, 2020, the EPA published final revisions to the 2015 ELG Rule related to flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water, but did not address the portions of the ELG rule that were remanded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petitions have been filed for judicial review of the final revisions. It is too early to determine whether the outcome of the decision or current or future revisions to retire Stuart and Killen generating stations, we do not expect the ELG rule tomight have a material impact on these two stations. While weour business, financial condition, and results of operations.
On April 23, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui case related to whether a CWA permit is required when pollutants originate from a point source but are still evaluatingconveyed to navigable waters through a nonpoint source, such as groundwater. The Court held that discharges to groundwater require a permit if the effectsaddition of the rule on our other U.S. businesses, we anticipate thatpollutants through groundwater is the implementationfunctional equivalent of its current requirements coulda direct discharge from the point source into navigable waters. On December 10, 2020, the EPA published a Notice of Availability of draft guidance memorandum addressing how the Supreme Court’s decision applies to NPDES permits. We are reviewing this decision and the EPA's draft guidance and it is too early to determine whether this decision may have a material adverse effectimpact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and a postponement or reconsideration of the rule that leads to less stringent requirements would likely offset some or all of the adverse effects of the rule.operations.
Selenium RuleIn June 2016, the EPA published the final national chronic aquatic life criterion for the pollutant Seleniumselenium in fresh water. NPDES permits may be updated to include Seleniumselenium water quality basedquality-based effluent limits based on a site specificsite-specific evaluation process, which includes determining if there is a reasonable potential to exceed the revised final Seleniumselenium water quality standards for the specific receiving water body utilizing actual and/or project discharge information for the generating facilities. As a result, it is not yet possible to predict the total impacts of this final rule at this time, including any challenges to such final rule and the outcome of any such challenges. However, if additional capital expenditures are necessary, they could be material. IPL would seek recovery of these capital expenditures; however, there is no guarantee it would be successful in this regard.
Waste Management — In the course of operations, the Company's facilities generate solid and liquid waste materials requiring eventual disposal or processing. With the exception of coal combustion residuals ("CCR"), the wastes are not usually physically disposed of on our property, but are shipped off site for final disposal, treatment or recycling. CCR, which consists of bottom ash, fly ash and air pollution control wastes, is disposed of at some of our coal-fired power generation plant sites using engineered, permitted landfills. Waste materials generated at our electric power and distribution facilities may include asbestos, CCR, oil, scrap metal, rubbish, small quantities of industrial hazardous wastes such as spent solvents, tree and land clearing wastes and polychlorinated biphenyl contaminated liquids and solids. The Company endeavors to ensure that all of its solid and liquid wastes are disposed of in accordance with applicable national, regional, state and local regulations. On October 19, 2015, an EPA rule regulating CCR under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act as nonhazardous solid waste became effective. The rule established nationally applicable minimum criteria for the disposal of CCR in new and currently operating landfills and surface impoundments, including location restrictions, design and may impose closure and/oroperating criteria, groundwater monitoring, corrective action and closure requirements, for existing CCR landfills and impoundments under certain specified conditions.post-closure care. The primary enforcement mechanisms under this regulation would be actions commenced by the states and private lawsuits. On December 16, 2016, President Obama signed into law the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act ("WIN Act"), which was signed into law. This includes provisions to implement the CCR rule through a state permitting program, or if the state chooses not to participate, a possible federal permit program. If this rule is finalized before Indiana or Puerto Rico establishes a state-level CCR permit program, AES CCR units in those locations could eventually be required to apply for a federal CCR permit from EPA. The EPA has indicated that it will implement a phased approach to amending the CCR Rule. On September 13, 2017,November 12, 2020, the EPA published its final Part B Rule, and indicated that it would reconsider certain provisionsaddress the issue of beneficial use of CCR for closure of ash ponds that are subject to forced closure in a separate and future rulemaking. This future rulemaking could impact IPL Petersburg plant’s ability to use CCR for closure of ash ponds. On August 28, 2020, the EPA published final amendments to the CCR Rule in responsetitled "A Holistic Approach to two petitions it receivedClosure Part A: Deadline to reconsiderInitiate Closure," which amends certain regulatory provisions that govern CCR.
The CCR rule, current or proposed amendments to the final rule. On November 7, 2017, the EPA requested that legal challenges be held in abeyance and certain provisions of theCCR rule, be remanded without vacatur. It is too early to determine whether the results of the groundwater monitoring data, or the outcome of CCRCCR-related litigation or a potential CCR Remand Rule maycould have a material impact on our business, financial condition, orand results of operations. IPL would seek recovery of any resulting expenditures; however, there is no guarantee we would be successful in this regard.
The existing ash ponds at IPL's Petersburg Station do not meet certain structural stability requirements set forth inOn January 2, 2020, Puerto Rico Senate Bill 1221 was signed by the CCR rule. IDEM has extended IPL's deadline to comply withPuerto Rico Governor into law and became effective as Act 5-2020. Act 5-2020 prohibits the requirements or ceasedisposal and unencapsulated beneficial use of CCR, places restrictions on storage of CCR in Puerto Rico, and requires the ash pondsPuerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources to April 11, 2018.develop implementation regulations. As such, it is not yet possible to determine whether this might have a material impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980This act, also knowknown as "Superfund," may be the source of claims against certain of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries from time to time. There is ongoing litigation at a site known as the South Dayton Landfill where a group of companies already recognized as potentially responsible parties ("PRPs") have sued DP&L and other unrelated entities seeking a contribution toward the costs of assessment and remediation. DP&L is actively opposing such claims. In 2003, DP&L received notice that the EPA considers DP&L to be a potentially responsible partyPRP at the Tremont City landfill Superfund site. The EPA has taken no further action with respect to DP&L since 2003 regarding the Tremont City landfill. On October 16,


51 | 2020 Annual Report

2019, DP&L received a special notice that the EPA considers DP&L, along with other parties, to be a PRP for the clean-up of hazardous substances at a third-party landfill known as the Tremont City Barrel Site, located near Dayton, Ohio. The Company is unable to determine whether there will be any liability, or the size of any liability that may ultimately be assessed against DP&L at these twothree sites, but any such liability could be material to DP&L.
Unit RetirementBiden Administration Actions Affecting Environmental RegulationsOn January 20, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order ("EO") titled “Protecting Public Health and Replacement Generation — In additionthe Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis” directing agencies to, among other tasks, review regulations issued under the prior Administration to determine whether they should be suspended, revoked, or revised. As provided for by the EO, the EPA submitted a letter to the five oil-fired peaking units IPL retiredDOJ seeking to obtain abeyances or stays of proceedings in pending litigation that seeks review of regulations promulgated during the second quarter of 2013, the four coal-fired units at Eagle Valley were retired in April 2016. To replace this generation, IPL received approvalTrump Administration. The Biden Administration also issued a Memorandum titled “Regulatory Freeze Pending Review” directing agencies to refrain from the IURC in May 2014 to build a 644 to 685 MW CCGT at its Eagle Valley Station site in Indiana and refuel its Harding Street Station Units 5 and 6 from coal to natural gas (approximately 100 MW net capacity each) with a total budget of $655 million. The current estimated cost of these projects is $655 million. IPL was granted authority to accrue post in-service allowance for debt and equity funds used during construction, and to defer the recognition of depreciation expense of the CCGT and refueling project. The costs to


build and operate the CCGT and the refueling project, other than fuel costs, will not be recoverable by IPL through ratesproposing or issuing any rules until the conclusionBiden Administration has reviewed and approved those rules. These actions may have an impact on regulations that may affect our business, financial condition, or results of a base rate case proceeding with the IURC after construction is completed. The CCGT is expected to be completed in the first half of 2018, and the refueling project was completed in December 2015.operations.
For a discussion of the retirement of AES Southland's OTC generating units due to U.S. cooling water intake regulations, please see — Cooling Water Intake, above.
International Environmental Regulations
For a discussion of the material environmental regulations applicable to the Company's businesses located outside of the U.S., see Environmental Regulation under the discussion of the various countries in which the Company's subsidiaries operate in Item 1.—Business—Our Organization and SegmentsBusiness, above. under the applicable SBUs.
Customers
We sell to a wide variety of customers. No individual customer accounted for 10% or more of our 20172020 total revenue. In our generation business, we own and/or operate power plants to generate and sell power to wholesale customers such as utilities and other intermediaries. Our utilities sell to end-user customers in the residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental sectors in a defined service area.
Human Capital Management
At AES, our people are instrumental to helping us meet the world’s energy needs. Supporting our people is a foundational value for AES. All of our actions are grounded in the shared values that shape AES’ culture: Safety First, Highest Standards, and All Together. The AES Corporation is led and managed by our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Leadership Team with the guidance and oversight of our Board of Directors.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 8,200 full time/permanent employees. The following chart lists our full time/permanent employees by SBU:
aes-20201231_g14.jpg
_____________________________
* On January 4, 2021, the merger of sPower as part of AES Clean Energy was completed and approximately 200 additional full time/permanent employees joined AES Clean Energy as part of the US and Utilities SBU.
As of December 31, 2020, approximately 45% of our U.S. employees were subject to collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreements between us and these labor unions expire at various dates ranging from 2021 to 2023. In addition, certain employees in non-U.S. locations were subject to collective bargaining


52 | 2020 Annual Report

agreements, representing approximately 65% of the non-U.S. workforce. Management believes that the Company's employee relations are favorable.
Safety
At AES, safety is one of our core values. Conducting safe operations at our facilities around the world, so that each person can return home safely, is the cornerstone of our daily activities and decisions. Safety efforts are led by our Chief Operating Officer and supported by safety committees that operate at the local site level. Hazards in the workplace are actively identified and management tracks incidents so remedial actions can be taken to improve workplace safety.
AES has established a Safety Management System (“SMS”) Global Safety Standard that applies to all AES employees, as well as contractors working in AES facilities and construction projects. The SMS requires continuous safety performance monitoring, risk assessment, and performance of periodic integrated environmental, health, and safety audits. The SMS provides a consistent framework for all AES operational businesses and construction projects to set expectations for risk identification and reduction, measure performance, and drive continuous improvements. The SMS standard is consistent with the OHSAS 18001/ISO 45001 standard, and during 2020 approximately 62% of our locations have elected to formally certify their SMS to the OHSAS 18001/ISO 45001 international standard. AES calculates lost time incident (“LTI”) rates for our employees and contractors based on OSHA standards, based on 200,000 labor hours, which equates to 100 workers who work 40 hours per week and 50 weeks per year. In 2020, there was a 37% decrease in LTI cases. In 2020, AES’ LTI Rate was 0.084 for AES People, 0.046 for operational contractors, and 0.069 for construction contractors. In 2020, the Company had one work-related fatality.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant changes that we determined were in the best interest of our employees, as well as the communities in which we operate. This includes having employees work from home to the extent they were able, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing critical on-site work.
Talent
We believe AES’ success depends on its ability to attract, develop, and retain key personnel. The skills, experience, and industry knowledge of key employees significantly benefit our operations and performance. We have a comprehensive approach to managing our talent and developing our leaders in order to ensure our people have the right skills for today and tomorrow, whether that requires us to build new business models or leverage leading technologies.
We emphasize employee development and training. To empower employees, we provide a range of development programs and opportunities, skills, and resources they need to be successful by focusing on experience and exposure, as well as formal programs including our ACE Academy for Talent Development and our Trainee Program.
At AES, we believe that our individual differences make us stronger. Our Diversity and Inclusion Program is led by our Diversity and Inclusion Officer. Governance and standards are guided by the Chief Human Resources Officer, with input from members of the Executive Leadership Team.
Compensation
AES’ executive compensation philosophy emphasizes pay-for-performance. Our incentive plans are designed to reward strong performance, with greater compensation paid when performance exceeds expectations and less compensation paid when performance falls below expectations. We invest significant time and resources to ensure our compensation programs are competitive and reward the performance of our people. Every year, AES people who are not part of a collective bargaining agreement are eligible for an annual merit-based salary increase. In addition, individuals are eligible for a salary increase if they receive a significant promotion. For non-collectively bargained employees at certain levels in the organization, we offer annual incentives (bonus) and long-term compensation to reinforce the alignment between AES' employees and AES.


53 | 2020 Annual Report

Executive Officers
The following individuals are our executive officers:
Bernerd Da Santos, 54 57 years old, was appointedhas served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President insince December 2017. Previously, Mr. Da Santos held several positions at the Company,AES, including Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President (2014 - 2017),from 2014 to 2017, Chief Financial Officer, Global Finance Operations (2012-2014),from 2012 to 2014, Chief Financial Officer of Global Utilities (2011-2012),from 2011 to 2012, Chief Financial Officer of Latin America and Africa (2009-2011),from 2009 to 2011, Chief Financial Officer of Latin America (2007-2009),from 2007 to 2009, Managing Director of Finance for Latin America (2005-2007)from 2005 to 2007, and VP and Controller of EDCLa Electricidad de Caracas ("EDC") (Venezuela). Prior to joining AES in 2000, Mr. Da Santos held a number of financial leadership positions at EDC. Mr. Da Santos is the chairman of AES Gener in Chile and a member of the Boardboards of Directors ofAES Gener, Companhia Brasiliana de Energia, AES Tietê, Companhia Energia, Compañia de Alumbrado Electrico de San Salvador, ("CAESS"), Empresa Electrica de Oriente, ("EEO"), CompanhiaCompañia de Alumbrado Electrico de Santa Ana, and Indianapolis Power & Light.Light, IPALCO, AES Distributed Energy, and AES Mong Duong Power Company Limited. Mr. Da Santos holds a bachelor's degree with Cum Laude distinction in Business Administration and Public Administration from Universidad José Maria Vargas, a bachelor's degree with Cum Laude distinction in Business Management and Finance, and an MBA with Cum Laude distinction from Universidad José Maria Vargas.
Paul L. Freedman, 4750 years old, has been Seniorserved as Executive Vice President, and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since February 2018.2021. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Freedman served aswas Senior Vice President and General Counsel from February 2018, Corporate Secretary from October 2018, Chief of Staff to the CEOChief Executive Officer from April 2016 to February 2018, Assistant General Counsel from 2014 to 2016, General Counsel, North America Generation, from 2011 to 2014, Senior Corporate Counsel from 2010-20112010 to 2011, and Counsel 2007 to 2010. Mr. Freedman is a member of the boardsBoards of IPALCO, AES U.S. Investments, DP&L, the Business Council for International Understanding, and Fluence. He is also an alternate Director at AES Gener.the Coalition for Integrity. Prior to joining AES, Mr. Freedman was Chief Counsel for credit programs at the U.S. Agency for International Development and he previously worked as an associate at the law firms of White & Case LLP and Freshfields. Mr. Freedman received a B.A. from Columbia University and a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center.
Andrés R. Gluski, 60 63 years old, has been President, CEOChief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors since September 2011 and is Chairmana member of the StrategyInnovation and Investment Committee of the Board.Technology Committee. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Gluski served as EVPExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer ("COO") of the Company since March 2007. Prior to becoming the COOChief Operating Officer of AES, Mr. Gluski was EVPExecutive Vice President and the Regional President of Latin America from 2006 to 2007. Mr. Gluski was Senior Vice President ("SVP") for the Caribbean and Central America from 2003 to 2006, CEOChief Executive Officer of La Electricidad de Caracas ("EDC")EDC from 2002 to 2003 and CEOChief Executive Officer of AES Gener (Chile) in 2001. Prior to joining AES in 2000, Mr. Gluski was EVPExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") of EDC, EVPExecutive Vice President of Banco de Venezuela (Grupo Santander), Vice President ("VP") for Santander Investment, and EVPExecutive Vice President and CFOChief Financial Officer of CANTV (subsidiary of GTE). Mr. Gluski has also worked with the International Monetary Fund in the Treasury and Latin American DepartmentsDepartments and served as Director General of the Ministry of Finance of Venezuela. From 2013-2016,2013 to 2016, Mr. Gluski served on President Obama's Export Council. Mr. Gluski is a member of the Board of Waste Management and AES Gener in Chile.Fluence. Mr. Gluski is also Chairman of the Americas Society/Council of the Americas, and Director of the Edison Electric Institute.Americas. Mr. Gluski is a magna cum laude graduate of Wake Forest University and holds an M.A. and a Ph.D. in Economics from thethe University of Virginia.
Tish MendozaLisa Krueger, 4257 years old, has served as Executive Vice President and President, US and Utilities SBU since February 2021. Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Krueger was Senior Vice President and President of the US and Utilities SBU from September 2018. Prior to joining AES, Ms. Krueger served as an energy consultant from July 2017 to August 2018, Chief Commercial Officer of Cogentrix Energy Power Management, LLC, the portfolio management company of Carlyle Power Partners, from January 2017 to June 2017, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Essential Power, LLC from March 2014 to June 2017. Ms. Krueger also served as Vice President, Sustainable Development of First Solar, one of the world’s largest photovoltaic manufacturers and system integrators, where she led the development and implementation of various domestic and internal strategic plans focused on market and business development and served as the President of First Solar Electric. Prior to First Solar, Ms. Krueger held a variety of executive level positions with Dynegy, Inc., including Vice President, Enterprise Risk Control, Vice President, Northeast Commercial Operations, Vice President, Origination and Retail Operations, and Vice President, Environmental, Health & Safety. Ms. Krueger is the Executive Chair of the Boards of IPALCO, Indianapolis Power & Light and Dayton Power & Light and Chair of the Board of AES Southland Energy, AES Clean Energy and AES U.S. Investments.She also held a variety of leadership roles at Illinois Power, including positions


54 | 2020 Annual Report

in transmission planning and system operations, generation planning and system operations, and environmental, health & safety. Ms. Krueger has a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Missouri University of Science and Technology and an MBA from the Jones Graduate School of Business at Rice University.
Tish Mendoza, 45 years old, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer andsince February 2021. Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Mendoza was Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources and Internal Communications since 2015. Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Mendoza was the


and Chief Human Resources Officer from 2015, Vice President of Human Resources, Global Utilities from 2011 to 2012 and Vice President of Global Compensation, Benefits and HRIS, including Executive Compensation,Compensation, from 2008 to 2011, and acted in the same capacity as the Director of the function from 2006 to 2008. In 2015, Ms. Mendoza was appointedis a member of the Boardsboards of AES Chivor S.A., DP&L, AES Distributed Energy, and DP&L,Uplight and sits on AES' compensation and benefits committees. She is also currently serving as co-chair of Evanta Global HR, and is part of its governing body in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining AES, Ms. Mendoza was Vice President of Human Resources for a product company in the Treasury Services division of JP Morgan Chase and Vice President of Human Resources and CompensationCompensation and Benefits at Vastera, Inc, a former technology and managed services company. Ms. Mendoza earned certificates in Leadership and Human Resource Management, and a bachelor's degree in Business Administration and Human Resources.
Thomas M. O'Flynn, 57Gustavo Pimenta, 42 years old, has served as EVPExecutive Vice President and CFO of the CompanyChief Financial Officer since September 2012. Previously,January 2019. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. O'FlynnPimenta served as Senior AdvisorDeputy Chief Financial Officer from February 2018 to December 2018, Chief Financial Officer for the Private Equity GroupMCAC SBU from December 2014 to February 2018 and as Chief Financial Officer of Blackstone, an investment and advisory group andAES Brazil from 2013 to December 2014. Prior to joining AES in 2009, Mr. Pimenta held this position from 2010 to 2012. During this period, Mr. O'Flynn also served as COO and CFO of Transmission Developers, Inc., a Blackstone-controlled company that develops innovative power transmission projects in an environmentally responsible manner. From 2001 to 2009, he served as the CFO of PSEG, a New Jersey-based merchant power and utility company. He also served asvarious positions at Citigroup, including Vice President of PSEG Energy Holdings from 2007 to 2009. From 1986 to 2001,Strategy and M&A in London and New York City. Mr. O'Flynn was in the Global Power and Utility Group of Morgan Stanley. He served as a Managing Director for his last five years and as head of the North American Power Group from 2000 to 2001. He was responsible for senior client relationships and led a number of large merger, financing, restructuring and advisory transactions. Mr. O'FlynnPimenta is the chairman of IPALCO, AES U.S. Investments and FTP Power, LLC. Mr. O'Flynn previously served as a member of the Boardsboards of DP&LJ.M. Huber Corporation, IPALCO, AES Gener, AES Clean Energy, and its parent company, DPL, Inc. from February 2013 through February 2015 and served on the Board of Silver Ridge Power,AES U.S. Investments. Mr. Pimenta received a joint venture between AES and Riverstone Holdings LLC from September 2012 through July 2014. He is also currently on the Board of Directors of the New Jersey Performing Arts Center and was the inaugural Chairman of the Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern University, of which he is still an active Board member. Mr. O'Flynn has a BABachelor’s degree in Economics from Northwestern UniversityUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais and an MBAa Master’s degree in Economics and Finance from Fundação Getulio Vargas. He also participated in development programs in Finance, from theStrategy and Risk Management at New York University, University of Chicago.Virginia’s Darden School of Business and Georgetown University.
How to Contact AES and Sources of Other Information
Our principal offices are located at 4300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Our telephone number is (703) 522-1315. Our website address is http://www.aes.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") are posted on our website. After the reports are filed with, or furnished to the SEC, they are available from us free of charge. Material contained on our website is not part of and is not incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. You may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet website that contains the reports, proxy and information statements and other information that we file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Our CEO and our CFO have provided certifications to the SEC as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications are included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our CEO provided a certification pursuant to Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual on May 19, 2017.4, 2020.
Our Code of Business Conduct ("Code of Conduct") and Corporate Governance Guidelines have been adopted by our Board of Directors. The Code of Conduct is intended to govern, as a requirement of employment, the actions of everyone who works at AES, including employees of our subsidiaries and affiliates. Our Ethics and Compliance Department provides training, information, and certification programs for AES employees related to the Code of Conduct. The Ethics and Compliance Department also has programs in place to prevent and detect criminal conduct, promote an organizational culture that encourages ethical behavior and a commitment to compliance with the law, and to monitor and enforce AES policies on corruption, bribery, money laundering and associations with terrorists groups. The Code of Conduct and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are located in their entirety on our website. Any person may obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct or the Corporate Governance Guidelines without charge by making a written request to: Corporate Secretary, The AES Corporation, 4300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203. If any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Conduct or the Corporate Governance Guidelines are made, we will disclose such amendments or waivers on our website.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risks, along with the other information contained in or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. Additional risks and uncertainties also may adversely affect our business and



55 | 2020 Annual Report


operations, including those discussedoperations. We routinely encounter and address risks, some of which may cause our future results to be materially different than we presently anticipate. The categories of risk we have identified in Item 7.1A.Risk Factors include risks associated with our operations, governmental regulation and laws, our indebtedness and financial condition. These risk factors should be read in conjunction with Item 7.—Management's Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis of FinancialFinancial Condition and Results of Operationsin this Form 10-K and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. If any of the following events actually occur, our business, financial results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.affected.
We routinely encounter and address risks, some of which may cause our future results to be different, sometimes materially different, than we presently anticipate. The categories of risk we have identified in Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K include the following:
risks related to our high level of indebtedness;
risks associated with our ability to raise needed capital;
external risks associated with revenue and earnings volatility;
risks associated with our operations; and
risks associated with governmental regulation and laws.
These risk factors should be read in conjunction with Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Risks Related to our High Level of Indebtedness
We have a significant amount of debt, a large percentage of which is secured, which could adversely affect our business and the ability to fulfill our obligations.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $20 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis. All outstanding borrowings, if any, under The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility and secured term loan are secured by certain of our assets, including the pledge of capital stock of many of The AES Corporation's directly held subsidiaries. Most of the debt of The AES Corporation's subsidiaries is secured by substantially all of the assets of those subsidiaries. Since we have such a high level of debt, a substantial portion of cash flow from operations must be used to make payments on this debt. Furthermore, since a significant percentage of our assets are used to secure this debt, this reduces the amount of collateral available for future secured debt or credit support and reduces our flexibility in operating these secured assets. This high level of indebtedness and related security could have other important consequences to us and our investors, including:
making it more difficult to satisfy debt service and other obligations at the holding company and/or individual subsidiaries;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse industry and economic conditions, including but not limited to adverse changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity prices;
reducing the availability of cash flow to fund other corporate purposes and grow our business;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged; and
limiting, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants relating to such indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds as needed or take advantage of business opportunities as they arise, pay cash dividends or repurchase common stock.
The agreements governing our indebtedness, including the indebtedness of our subsidiaries, limit, but do not prohibit the incurrence of additional indebtedness. To the extent we become more leveraged, the risks described above would increase. Further, our actual cash requirements in the future may be greater than expected. Accordingly, our cash flows may not be sufficient to repay at maturity all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due and, in that event, we may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, raise equity or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms or at all to refinance our debt as it becomes due. See Note 10.Debt included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for a schedule of our debt maturities.
The AES Corporation is a holding company and its ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness, including its public debt securities, is dependent upon the receipt of funds from its subsidiaries by way of dividends, fees, interest, loans or otherwise.
The AES Corporation is a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries. Almost all of The AES Corporation's cash flow is generated by the operating activities of its subsidiaries. Therefore, The AES Corporation's ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund its other obligations is dependent not only on the ability of its subsidiaries to generate cash, but also on the ability of the subsidiaries to distribute cash to it in the form of dividends, fees, interest, tax sharing payments, loans or otherwise.


However, our subsidiaries face various restrictions in their ability to distribute cash to The AES Corporation. Most of the subsidiaries are obligated, pursuant to loan agreements, indentures or non-recourse financing arrangements, to satisfy certain restricted payment covenants or other conditions before they may make distributions to The AES Corporation, if at all. Business performance and local accounting and tax rules may also limit dividend distributions. Subsidiaries in foreign countries may also be prevented from distributing funds to The AES Corporation as a result of foreign governments restricting the repatriation of funds or the conversion of currencies.
The AES Corporation's subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and, unless they have expressly guaranteed any of The AES Corporation's indebtedness, have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to such debt or to make any funds available whether by dividends, fees, loans or other payments.
Even though The AES Corporation is a holding company, existing and potential future defaults by subsidiaries or affiliates could adversely affect The AES Corporation.
We attempt to finance our domestic and foreign projects primarily under loan agreements and related documents which, except as noted below, require the loans to be repaid solely from the project's revenues and provide that the repayment of the loans (and interest thereon) is secured solely by the capital stock, physical assets, contracts and cash flow of that project subsidiary or affiliate. This type of financing is usually referred to as non-recourse debt or "non-recourse financing." In some non-recourse financings, The AES Corporation has explicitly agreed to undertake certain limited obligations and contingent liabilities, most of which by their terms will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. These obligations and liabilities take the form of guarantees, indemnities, letters of credit, letter of credit reimbursement agreements and agreements to pay, in certain circumstances, the project lenders or other parties.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $20 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis, of which approximately $4.6 billion was recourse debt of The AES Corporation and approximately $15.3 billion was non-recourse debt. In addition, we have outstanding guarantees, indemnities, letters of credit, and other credit support commitments which are further described in this Form 10-K in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCapital Resources and LiquidityParent Company Liquidity.
Some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total debt classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to such defaults was $1 billion as of December 31, 2017. While the lenders under our non-recourse financings generally do not have direct recourse to The AES Corporation (other than to the extent of any credit support given by The AES Corporation), defaults thereunder can still have important consequences for The AES Corporation, including, without limitation:
reducing The AES Corporation's receipt of subsidiary dividends, fees, interest payments, loans and other sources of cash since the project subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to The AES Corporation during the pendency of any default;
under certain circumstances, triggering The AES Corporation's obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit or other credit support which The AES Corporation has provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;
triggering defaults in The AES Corporation's outstanding debt. For example, The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility, secured term loan, and outstanding senior notes include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries. In addition, The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility includes certain events of default relating to accelerations of outstanding material debt of material subsidiaries or any subsidiaries that in the aggregate constitute a material subsidiary; or
foreclosure on the assets that are pledged under the non-recourse loans, resulting in write-downs of assets and eliminating any and all potential future benefits derived from those assets.
None of the projects that are currently in default are owned by subsidiaries that individually or in the aggregate meet the applicable standard of materiality in The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility or other debt agreements in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under such indebtedness. However, as a result of future mix of distributions, write-down of assets, dispositions and other matters that affect our financial position and results of operations, it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries, individually or in the aggregate, could fall within the applicable standard of materiality and thereby upon an acceleration of such


subsidiary's debt, trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility or other indebtedness of The AES Corporation.
Risks Associated with our Ability to Raise Needed Capital
The AES Corporation, or the Parent Company, has significant cash requirements and limited sources of liquidity.
The AES Corporation requires cash primarily to fund:
principal repayments of debt;
interest;
acquisitions;
construction and other project commitments;
other equity commitments, including business development investments;
equity repurchases and/or cash dividends on our common stock;
taxes; and
Parent Company overhead costs.
The AES Corporation's principal sources of liquidity are:
dividends and other distributions from its subsidiaries;
proceeds from debt and equity financings at the Parent Company level; and
proceeds from asset sales.
For a more detailed discussion of The AES Corporation's cash requirements and sources of liquidity, please see Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity in this Form 10-K.
While we believe that these sources will be adequate to meet our obligations at the Parent Company level for the foreseeable future, this belief is based on a number of material assumptions, including, without limitation, assumptions about our ability to access the capital or commercial lending markets, the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, exchange rates, our ability to sell assets, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions. Any number of assumptions could prove to be incorrect, and, therefore there can be no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that our actual cash requirements will not be greater than expected. In addition, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay at maturity the entire principal outstanding under our credit facility, term loan, and our debt securities and we may have to refinance such obligations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such refinancing on terms acceptable to us or at all and any of these events could have a material effect on us.
Our ability to grow our business could be materially adversely affected if we were unable to raise capital on favorable terms.
From time to time, we rely on access to capital markets as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows. Our ability to arrange for financing on either a recourse or non-recourse basis and the costs of such capital are dependent on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
general economic and capital market conditions;
the availability of bank credit;
the financial condition, performance and prospects of The AES Corporation in general and/or that of any subsidiary requiring the financing as well as companies in our industry or similar financial circumstances; and
changes in tax and securities laws which are conducive to raising capital.
Should future access to capital not be available to us, we may have to sell assets or decide not to build new plants, or expand or improve existing facilities, either of which would affect our future growth, results of operations or financial condition.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of The AES Corporation or its subsidiaries could adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets which could increase our interest costs or adversely affect our liquidity and cash flow.


If any of the credit ratings of The AES Corporation or its subsidiaries were to be downgraded, our ability to raise capital on favorable terms could be impaired and our borrowing costs could increase. Furthermore, depending on The AES Corporation's credit ratings and the trading prices of its equity and debt securities, counterparties may no longer be as willing to accept general unsecured commitments by The AES Corporation to provide credit support. Accordingly, with respect to both new and existing commitments, The AES Corporation may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit and/or collateral, to backstop or replace any credit support by The AES Corporation. There can be no assurance that such counterparties will accept such guarantees or that AES could arrange such further assurances in the future. In addition, to the extent The AES Corporation is required and able to provide letters of credit or other collateral to such counterparties, it will limit the amount of credit available to The AES Corporation to meet its other liquidity needs.
We may not be able to raise sufficient capital to fund developing projects in certain less developed economies which could change or in some cases adversely affect our growth strategy.
Part of our strategy is to grow our business by developing businesses in less developed economies where the return on our investment may be greater than projects in more developed economies. Commercial lending institutions sometimes refuse to provide non-recourse project financing in certain less developed economies, and in these situations we have sought and will continue to seek direct or indirect (through credit support or guarantees) project financing from a limited number of multilateral or bilateral international financial institutions or agencies. As a precondition to making such project financing available, the lending institutions may also require governmental guarantees for certain project and sovereign related risks. There can be no assurance, however, that project financing from the international financial agencies or that governmental guarantees will be available when needed, and if they are not, we may have to abandon the project or invest more of our own funds which may not be in line with our investment objectives and would leave less funds for other projects.
External Risks Associated with Revenue and Earnings Volatility
Our businesses may incur substantial costs and liabilities and be exposed to price volatility as a result of risks associated with the wholesale electricity markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
Some of our businesses sell electricity in the spot markets in cases where they operate at levels in excess of their power sales agreements or retail load obligations. Our businesses may also buy electricity in the wholesale spot markets. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of rising and falling prices in those markets. The open market wholesale prices for electricity can be volatile and generally reflect the variable cost of the source generation which could include renewable sources at near zero pricing or thermal sources subject to fluctuating cost of fuels such as coal, natural gas or oil derivative fuels in addition to other factors described below. Consequently, any changes in the generation supply stack and cost of coal, natural gas, or oil derivative fuels may impact the open market wholesale price of electricity.
Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from, among other things:
plant availability in the markets generally;
availability and effectiveness of transmission facilities owned and operated by third parties;
competition;
seasonality;
hydrology and other weather conditions;
illiquid markets;
transmission or transportation constraints or inefficiencies;
renewables source contribution to the supply stack;
increased adoption of distributed generation;
energy efficiency and demand side resources;
available supplies of natural gas, crude oil and refined products, and coal;
generating unit performance;
natural disasters, terrorism, wars, embargoes, and other catastrophic events;
energy, market and environmental regulation, legislation and policies;
general economic conditions in areas where we operate which impact energy consumption; and
bidding behavior and market bidding rules.


Our financial position and results of operations may fluctuate significantly due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates experienced at our foreign operations.
Our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results primarily from the translation exposure associated with the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as from transaction exposure associated with transactions in currencies other than an entity's functional currency. While the Consolidated Financial Statements are reported in U.S. dollars, the financial statements of many of our subsidiaries outside the U.S. are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency and translated into U.S. dollars by applying appropriate exchange rates. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currencies where our subsidiaries outside the U.S. report could cause significant fluctuations in our results. In addition, while our expenses with respect to foreign operations are generally denominated in the same currency as corresponding sales, we have transaction exposure to the extent receipts and expenditures are not denominated in the subsidiary's functional currency. Moreover, the costs of doing business abroad may increase as a result of adverse exchange rate fluctuations. Our financial position and results of operations could be affected by fluctuations in the value of a number of currencies.
Wholesale Power Prices are declining in many markets and this could have a material adverse effect on our operations and opportunities for future growth.
The wholesale prices offered for electricity have declined significantly in recent years in many markets in which the Company has businesses. This price decline is due to a variety of factors, including the increased penetration of renewable generation resources, cheap natural gas and demand side management. The levelized cost of electricity from new solar and wind generation sources has dropped substantially in recent years as solar panel costs have declined and wind turbine costs have declined, while wind capacity factors have increased. These renewable resources have no fuel costs and very low operational costs. In many instances energy from these facilities are bid into the wholesale spot market at a price of zero or close to zero during certain times of the day, driving down the clearing price for all generators selling power in the relevant spot market. Also, in many markets new power purchase agreements have been awarded for renewable generation at prices significantly lower than the prices being awarded just a few years ago.
This trend of declining wholesale prices could continue and could have a material adverse impact on the financial performance of our existing generation assets to the extent they currently sell power into the spot market or will seek to sell power into the spot market once their power purchase agreements expire. The trend of declining prices can also make it more difficult for us to obtain attractive prices under new long-term power purchase agreements for any new generation facilities we may seek to develop. As a result, the trend can have an adverse impact on our opportunities for new investments.
We may not be adequately hedged against our exposure to changes in commodity prices or interest rates.
We routinely enter into contracts to hedge a portion of our purchase and sale commitments for electricity, fuel requirements and other commodities to lower our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed price or indexed forward physical purchase and sales contracts, futures, financial swaps, and option contracts traded in the over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. We also enter into contracts which help us manage our interest rate exposure. However, we may not cover the entire exposure of our assets or positions to market price or interest rate volatility, and the coverage will vary over time. Furthermore, the risk management practices we have in place may not always perform as planned. In particular, if prices of commodities or interest rates significantly deviate from historical prices or interest rates or if the price or interest rate volatility or distribution of these changes deviates from historical norms, our risk management practices may not protect us from significant losses. As a result, fluctuating commodity prices or interest rates may negatively impact our financial results to the extent we have unhedged or inadequately hedged positions. In addition, certain types of economic hedging activities may not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP, resulting in increased volatility in our net income. The Company may also suffer losses associated with "basis risk" which is the difference in performance between the hedge instrument and the targeted underlying exposure. Furthermore, there is a risk that the current counterparties to these arrangements may fail or are unable to perform part or all of their obligations under these arrangements.
For our businesses with PPA pricing that does not perfectly pass through our fuel costs, the businesses attempt to manage the exposure through flexible fuel purchasing and timing of entry and terms of our fuel supply agreements; however, these risk management efforts may not be successful and the resulting commodity exposure could have a material impact on these businesses and/or our results of operations.


Supplier and/or customer concentration may expose the Company to significant financial credit or performance risks.
We often rely on a single contracted supplier or a small number of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel and other services required for the operation of some of our facilities. If these suppliers cannot perform, we would seek to meet our fuel requirements by purchasing fuel at market prices, exposing us to market price volatility and the risk that fuel and transportation may not be available during certain periods at any price, which could adversely impact the profitability of the affected business and our results of operations, and could result in a breach of agreements with other counterparties, including, without limitation, offtakers or lenders.
At times, we rely on a single customer or a few customers to purchase all or a significant portion of a facility's output, in some cases under long-term agreements that account for a substantial percentage of the anticipated revenue from a given facility. Counterparties to these agreements may breach or may be unable to perform their obligations. We may not be able to enter into replacement agreements on terms as favorable as our existing agreements, or at all. If we were unable to enter into replacement PPAs, these businesses may have to sell power at market prices. A breach by a counterparty of a PPA or other agreement could also result in the breach of other agreements, including, without limitation, the debt documents of the affected business.
The failure of any supplier or customer to fulfill its contractual obligations to The AES Corporation or our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Consequently, the financial performance of our facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and continued performance by, suppliers and customers.
The market pricing of our common stock may be volatile in future periods.
The market price for our common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future. Stock price movements on a quarter-by-quarter basis for the past two years are presented in Item 5.—Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity SecuritiesMarket Information of this Form 10-K. Factors that could affect the price of our common stock in the future include general conditions in our industry, in the power markets in which we participate and in the world, including environmental and economic developments, over which we have no control, as well as developments specific to us, including risks that could result in revenue and earnings volatility as well as other risk factors described in Item 1A.—Risk Factors and those matters described in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.
Risks Associated with our Operations
We do a significant amount of business outside the U.S., including in developing countries, which presents significant risks.
A significant amount of our revenue is generated outside the U.S. and a significant portion of our international operations is conducted in developing countries. Part of our growth strategy is to expand our business in certain developing countries in which AES has an existing presence as such countries may have higher growth rates and offer greater opportunities to expand from our platforms, with potentially higher returns than in some more developed countries. International operations, particularly the operation, financing and development of projects in developing countries, entail significant risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation:
economic, social and political instability in any particular country or region;
adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
government restrictions on converting currencies or repatriating funds;
unexpected changes in foreign laws and regulations or in trade, monetary or fiscal policies;
high inflation and monetary fluctuations;
restrictions on imports of coal, oil, gas or other raw materials required by our generation businesses to operate;
threatened or consummated expropriation or nationalization of our assets by foreign governments;
risks relating to the failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, United Kingdom Bribery Act or other anti-bribery laws applicable to our operations;
difficulties in hiring, training and retaining qualified personnel, particularly finance and accounting personnel with GAAP expertise;
unwillingness of governments and their agencies, similar organizations or other counterparties to honor their contracts;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, courts or similar bodies to enforce contracts that are economically advantageous to subsidiaries of the Company and economically unfavorable to


counterparties, against such counterparties, whether such counterparties are governments or private parties;
inability to obtain access to fair and equitable political, regulatory, administrative and legal systems;
adverse changes in government tax policy;
difficulties in enforcing our contractual rights or enforcing judgments or obtaining a favorable result in local jurisdictions; and
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions.
Any of these factors, by itself or in combination with others, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our operations may experience volatility in revenues and operating margin which have caused and are expected to cause significant volatility in our results of operations and cash flows. The volatility is caused by regulatory and economic difficulties, political instability and currency devaluations being experienced in many of these countries. This volatility reduces the predictability and enhances the uncertainty associated with cash flows from these businesses. A number of our businesses are facing challenges associated with regulatory changes. 
The operation of power generation, distribution and transmission facilities involves significant risks that could adversely affect our financial results. We and/or our subsidiaries may not have adequate risk mitigation and/or insurance coverage for liabilities.risks.
We are in the business of generating and distributing electricity, which involves certain risks that can adversely affect financial and operating performance, including:
changes in the availability of our generation facilities or distribution systems due to increases in scheduled and unscheduled plant outages, equipment failure, failure of transmission systems, labor disputes, disruptions in fuel supply, poor hydrologic and wind conditions, inability to comply with regulatory or permit requirements, or catastrophic events such as fires, floods, storms, hurricanes, earthquakes, dam failures, tsunamis, explosions, terrorist acts, cyber attacks or other similar occurrences; and
changes in our operating cost structure, including, but not limited to, increases in costs relating to gas, coal, oil and other fuel; fuel transportation; purchased electricity; operations, maintenance and repair; environmental compliance, including the cost of purchasing emissions offsets and capital expenditures to install environmental emission equipment; transmission access; and insurance.
Our businesses require reliable transportation sources (including related infrastructure such as roads, ports and rail), power sources and water sources to access and conduct operations. The availability and cost of this infrastructure affects capital and operating costs and levels of production and sales. Limitations, or interruptions in this infrastructure or at the facilities of our subsidiaries, including as a result of third parties intentionally or unintentionally disrupting this infrastructure or the facilities of our subsidiaries, could impede their ability to produce electricity. This could have a material adverse effect on our businesses' results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
In addition, a portion of our generation facilities were constructed many years ago. Older generating equipmentago and may require significant capital expenditures for maintenance. The equipment at our plants whether old or new, is also likely to requirerequires periodic upgrading, improvement or repair, and replacement equipment or parts may be difficult to obtain in circumstances where we rely on a single supplier or a small number of suppliers. The inability to obtain replacement equipment or parts may impact the ability of our plants to perform and could, therefore, have a material impact on our business and results of operations.perform. Breakdown or failure of one of our operating facilities may prevent the facility from performing under applicable power sales agreements which, in certain situations, could result in termination of a power purchase or other agreement or incurrence of a liability for liquidated damages and/or other penalties.
As a result of the above risks and other potential hazards associated with the power generation, distribution and transmission industries, we may from time to time become exposed to significant liabilities for which we may not have adequate risk mitigation and/or insurance coverage. Power generation involves hazardous activities, including acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large pieces of rotating equipment and delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks, such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, hurricanes and wind, hazards, such as fire, explosion, collapse and machinery failure, are inherent risks in our operations which may occur as a result of inadequate internal processes, technological flaws, human error or actions of third parties or other external events. The control and management of these risks depend upon adequate development and training of personnel and on the existence of operational procedures, preventative maintenance


plans and specific programs supported by quality control systems, which reduce, but domay not eliminate, the possibility ofprevent the occurrence and impact of these risks.
The hazards described above, along with other safety hazards associated with our operations, can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment, contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. The occurrence of any one of these events may result in our being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for substantial damages, environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and fines and/or penalties.
Furthermore, we and our affiliates are parties to material litigation and regulatory proceedings. See Item 3.— Legal Proceedingsbelow. There can be no assurance that the outcomes of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.


56 | 2020 Annual Report

We do a significant amount of business outside the U.S., including in developing countries.
A significant amount of our revenue is generated in developing countries and we intend to expand our business in certain developing countries in which AES has an existing presence. International operations, particularly in developing countries, entail significant risks and uncertainties, including:
economic, social and political instability in any particular country or region;
adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
government restrictions on converting currencies or repatriating funds;
unexpected changes in foreign laws and regulations or in trade, monetary, fiscal or environmental policies;
high inflation and monetary fluctuations;
restrictions on imports of solar panels, wind turbines, coal, oil, gas or other raw materials;
threatened or consummated expropriation or nationalization of our assets by foreign governments;
unexpected delays in permitting and governmental approvals;
unexpected changes or instability affecting our strategic partners in developing countries;
failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or other applicable anti-bribery regulations;
unwillingness of governments, agencies, similar organizations or other counterparties to honor contracts;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, courts or similar bodies to enforce contracts that are economically advantageous to AES and less beneficial to government or private party counterparties, against those counterparties;
inability to obtain access to fair and equitable political, regulatory, administrative and legal systems;
adverse changes in government tax policy and tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions;
difficulties in enforcing our contractual rights or enforcing judgments or obtaining a favorable result in local jurisdictions; and
inability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
Developing projects in less developed economies also entails greater financing risks and such financing may only be available from multilateral or bilateral international financial institutions or agencies that require governmental guarantees for certain project and sovereign-related risks. There can be no assurance that project financing will be available.
Further, our operations may experience volatility in revenues and operating margin caused by regulatory and economic difficulties, political instability and currency devaluations, which may increase the uncertainty of cash flows from these businesses.
Any of these factors could have a material, adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our businesses may incur substantial costs and liabilities and be exposed to price volatility as a result of risks associated with the wholesale electricity markets.
Some of our businesses sell or buy electricity in the spot markets when they operate at levels that differ from their power sales agreements or retail load obligations or when they do not have any powers sales agreements. Our businesses may also buy electricity in the wholesale spot markets. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of rising and falling prices in those markets. The open market wholesale prices for electricity can be volatile and generally reflect the variable cost of the source generation which could include renewable sources at near zero pricing or thermal sources subject to fluctuating cost of fuels such as coal, natural gas or oil derivative fuels in addition to other factors described below. Consequently, any changes in the generation supply stack and cost of coal, natural gas, or oil derivative fuels may impact the open market wholesale price of electricity.
Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from, among other things:
plant availability in the markets generally;
availability and effectiveness of transmission facilities owned and operated by third parties;
competition and new entrants;
seasonality, hydrology and other weather conditions;


57 | 2020 Annual Report

illiquid markets;
transmission, transportation constraints, inefficiencies and/or availability;
renewables source contribution to the supply stack;
increased adoption of distributed generation;
energy efficiency and demand side resources;
available supplies of coal, natural gas, and crude oil and refined products;
generating unit performance;
natural disasters, terrorism, wars, embargoes, pandemics and other catastrophic events;
energy, market and environmental regulation, legislation and policies;
general economic conditions that impact demand and energy consumption; and
bidding behavior and market bidding rules.
Wholesale power prices are declining in many markets which could impact our operations and opportunities for future growth.
The wholesale prices offered for electricity have declined significantly in recent years in many markets in which we operate due to a variety of factors, including the increased penetration of renewable generation resources, low-priced natural gas and demand side management. The levelized cost of electricity from new solar and wind generation sources has decreased substantially in recent years as solar panel costs and wind turbine costs have declined, while wind and solar capacity factors have increased. These renewable resources have no fuel costs and very low operational costs. In many instances, energy from these facilities are bid into the wholesale spot market at a price of zero or close to zero during certain times of the day, driving down the clearing price for all generators selling power in the relevant spot market. Also, in many markets, new PPAs have been awarded for renewable generation at prices significantly lower than those awarded just a few years ago.
This trend of declining wholesale prices could continue and could have a material adverse impact on the financial performance of our existing generation assets to the extent they currently sell power into the spot market or will seek to sell power into the spot market once their PPAs expire. This trend can also make it more difficult for us to obtain attractive prices under new long-term PPAs for any new generation facilities we may seek to develop and have an adverse impact on our opportunities for new investments.
The COVID-19 pandemic, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could impact our business and operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted global economic activity, including electricity and energy consumption. COVID-19 or another pandemic could have material and adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows due to, among other factors:
further decline in customer demand as a result of general decline in business activity;
further destabilization of the markets and decline in business activity negatively impacting customers’ ability to pay for our services when due or at all, including downstream impacts, whereby the utilities’ customers are unable to pay monthly bills or receiving a moratorium from payment obligations, resulting in inability on the part of utilities to make payments for power supplied by our generation companies;
decline in business activity causing our commercial and industrial customers to experience declining revenues and liquidity difficulties that impede their ability to pay for power that we supply;
government moratoriums or other regulatory or legislative actions that limit changes in pricing, delay or suspend customers’ payment obligations or permit extended payment terms applicable to customers of our utilities or to our offtakers under power purchase agreements, in particular, to the extent that such measures are not mitigated by associated government subsidies or other support to address any shortfall or deficiencies in payments;
claims by our PPA counterparties for delay or relief from payment obligations or other adjustments, including claims based on force majeure or other legal grounds;
further decline in spot electricity prices;
the destabilization of the markets and decline in business activity negatively impacting our customer growth in our service territories at our utilities;


58 | 2020 Annual Report

negative impacts on the health of our essential personnel and on our operations as a result of implementing stay-at-home, quarantine, curfew and other social distancing measures;
delays or inability to access, transport and deliver fuel to our generation facilities due to restrictions on business operations or other factors affecting us and our third-party suppliers;
delays or inability to access equipment or the availability of personnel to perform planned and unplanned maintenance, which can, in turn, lead to disruption in operations;
a deterioration in our ability to ensure business continuity, including increased cybersecurity attacks related to the work-from-home environment;
further delays to our construction projects, including at our renewables projects, and the timing of the completion of renewables projects;
delay or inability to receive the necessary permits for our development projects due to delays or shutdowns of government operations;
delays in achieving our financial goals, strategy and digital transformation;
deterioration of the credit profile of The AES Corporation and/or its subsidiaries and difficulty accessing the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets, or deterioration in credit and financing conditions, which could affect our access to capital necessary to fund business operations or address maturing liabilities on a timely basis;
delays or inability to complete asset sales on anticipated terms or to redeploy capital as set forth in our capital allocation plans;
increased volatility in foreign exchange and commodity markets;
deterioration of economic conditions, demand and other related factors resulting in impairments to goodwill or long-lived assets; and
delay or inability in obtaining regulatory actions and outcomes that could be material to our business, including for recovery of COVID-19 related losses and the review and approval of our rates at our U.S. regulated utilities.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic also depends on factors, including the effectiveness and timing of vaccine development and distribution efforts, the development of more virulent COVID-19 variants as well as third-party actions taken to contain its spread and mitigate its public health effects. The COVID-19 pandemic presents material uncertainty that could adversely affect our generation facilities, transmission and distribution systems, development projects, energy storage sales by Fluence, and results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The COVID-19 pandemic may also heighten many of the other risks described in this section.
Adverse economic developments in China could have a negative impact on demand for electricity in many of our markets.
The Chinese market has been driving global materials demand and pricing for commodities over the past decade. Many of these commodities are produced in our key electricity markets. After experiencing rapid growth for more than a decade, China’s economy has experienced decreasing foreign and domestic demand, weak investment, factory overcapacity and oversupply in the property market, and has experienced a significant slowdown in recent years. U.S. tariffs have also had a negative impact on China's economic growth. Continued slowing in China’s economic growth, demand for commodities and/or material changes in policy could result in lower economic growth and lower demand for electricity in our key markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
We may not have adequate risk mitigation and/or insurance coverage for liabilities.
Power generation, distribution and transmission involves hazardous activities. We may become exposed to significant liabilities for which we may not have adequate risk mitigation and/or insurance coverage. Furthermore, through AGIC, AES’ captive insurance company, we take certain insurance risk on our businesses. We maintain an amount of insurance protection that we believe is customary, but there can be no assurance that our insuranceit will be sufficient or effective underin light of all circumstances, and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject. A claimOur insurance does not cover every potential risk associated with our operations. Adequate coverage at reasonable rates is not always obtainable. In particular, the availability of insurance for which we are not fully insuredcoal-fired generation assets has decreased as certain insurers have opted to discontinue or insured at all could hurt our financial results and materially harm our financial condition. Further, due to the cyclical nature of thelimit offering insurance markets, wefor such assets. Certain insurers have also withdrawn from insuring hydroelectric assets. We cannot provide assurance that insurance coverage will continue to be


59 | 2020 Annual Report

available in the amounts or on terms similar to those presently available to us or at all. Any losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our businesses' insurance does not cover every potential risk associated with its operations. Adequate coverage at reasonable rates is not always obtainable.current policies. In addition, insurance may not fully cover the liability or the consequences of any business interruptions such as natural catastrophes, equipment failure or labor dispute. The occurrence of a significant adverse event not fully or partiallyadequately covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on the Company'sour business, results or operations, financial condition, and prospects.
Any of the above risks could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We may not be able to attract and retain skilled people, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our operating success and ability to carry out growth initiatives depends in part on our ability to retain executives and to attract and retain additional qualified personnel who have experience in our industry and in operating a company of our size and complexity, including people in our foreign businesses. The inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, because of the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacements. For example, we routinely are required to assess the financial impacts of complicated business transactions which occur on a worldwide basis. These assessments are dependent on hiring personnel on a worldwide basis with sufficient expertise in U.S. GAAP to timely and accurately comply with U.S. reporting obligations. An inability to maintain adequate internal accounting and managerial controls and hire and retain qualified personnel could have an adverse effect on our financial and tax reporting.
We have contractual obligations to certain customers to provide full requirements service, which makes it difficult to predict and plan for load requirements and may result in increased operating costs to certain of our businesses.
We have contractual obligations to certain customers to supply power to satisfy all or a portion of their energy requirements. The uncertainty regarding the amount of power that our power generation and distribution facilities must be prepared to supply to customers may increase our operating costs. A significant under- or over-estimation of load requirements could result in our facilities not having enough or having too much power to cover their obligations, in which case we would be required to buy or sell power from or to third parties at prevailing market prices. Those prices may not be favorable and thus could increase our operating costs.
We may not be able to enter into long-term contracts whichthat reduce volatility in our results of operations.results.
Many of our generation plants conduct business under long-term sales and supply contracts, which helps these businesses to manage risks by reducing the volatility associated with power and input costs and providing a stable revenue and cost structure. In these instances, we rely on power sales contracts with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant plant's output and revenues over the term of the power sales contract. The remaining terms of the power sales contracts of our generation plants range from one to 25more than 20 years. In many cases, we also limit our exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices by entering into long-term contracts for fuel with a limited number of suppliers. In these instances, the cash flows and results of operations are dependent on the continued ability of customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under the relevant power sales contract or fuel supply contract, respectively. Some of our long-term power sales agreements are at prices above current spot market prices and some of our long-term fuel supply contracts are at prices below current market prices. The loss of significant power sales contracts or fuel supply contracts, or the failure by any of the parties to such contracts that prevents us from fulfilling our obligations thereunder, could adversely impact our strategy by resulting in costs that exceed revenue, which could have a material adverse impact on our business,


results of operations and financial condition. In addition, depending on market conditions and regulatory regimes, it may be difficult for us to secure long-term contracts, either where our current contracts are expiring or for new development projects. The inability to enter into long-term contracts could require many of our businesses to purchase inputs at market prices and sell electricity into spot markets, which may not be favorable.
We have sought to reduce counterparty credit risk under our long-term contracts in part by entering into power sales contracts with utilities or other customers of strong credit quality and by obtaining guarantees from certain sovereign governments of the customer's obligations. However,obligations; however, many of our customers do not have or have failed to maintain, annot maintained, investment-grade credit rating, and ourratings. Our generation businessbusinesses cannot always obtain government guarantees and if they do, the government doesmay not always have an investment grade credit rating. We have also sought to reduce our credit risk by locatinglocated our plants in different geographic areas in order to mitigate the effects of regional economic downturns. However,downturns; however, there can be no assurance that our efforts to mitigate this risk will be successful.effective.
Competition is increasing and could adversely affect us.
The power production markets in which we operate are characterized by numerous strong and capable competitors, many of whom may have extensive and diversified developmental or operating experience (including both domestic and international) and financial resources similar to, or greater than, ours. Further, in recent years, the power production industry has been characterized by strong and increasing competition with respect to both obtaining power sales agreements and acquiring existing power generation assets. In certain markets, these factors have caused reductions in prices contained in new power sales agreements and, in many cases, have caused higher acquisition prices for existing assets through competitive bidding practices. The evolution of competitive electricity markets and the development of highly efficient gas-fired power plants and renewables such as wind and solar have also caused, or are anticipatedand could continue to cause, price pressure in certain power markets where we sell or intend to sell power. These competitive factorsIn addition, the introduction of low-cost disruptive technologies or the entry of non-traditional competitors into our sector and markets could adversely affect our ability to compete, which could have a material adverse effect on us.our businesses, operating results and financial condition.
SomeSupplier and/or customer concentration may expose us to significant financial credit or performance risks.
We often rely on a single contracted supplier or a small number of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel and other services required for the operation of some of our subsidiaries participate in defined benefit pension plans and their net pension plan obligations may require additional significant contributions.
Certain offacilities. If these suppliers cannot perform, we would seek to meet our subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their respective employees. Of the thirty one such defined benefit plans, five arefuel requirements by purchasing fuel at U.S. subsidiariesmarket prices, exposing us to market price volatility and the remaining plans arerisk that fuel and transportation may not be available during certain periods at foreign subsidiaries. Pension costs are based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including an expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets,any price, which could adversely impact the expected life span of pension plan beneficiaries and the discount rate used to determine the present value of future pension obligations. Any of these assumptions could prove to be wrong, resulting in a shortfall of pension plan assets compared to pension obligations under the pension plan. The Company periodically evaluates the valueprofitability of the pension plan assets to ensure that they will be sufficient to fund the respective pension obligations. The Company's exposure to market volatility is mitigated to some extent due to the fact that the asset allocations inaffected business and our largest plans include a significant weightingresults of investments in fixed income securities that are less volatile than investments in equity securities. Future downturns in the debt and/or equity markets, or the inaccuracy of any of our significant assumptions underlying the estimates of our subsidiaries' pension plan obligations,operations, and could result in an increase in pension expense and future funding requirements,a breach of agreements with other counterparties, including, without limitation, offtakers or lenders. Further, our suppliers may source certain materials from areas impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which may cause delays and/or disruptions to our development projects or operations.


60 | 2020 Annual Report

The financial performance of our facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and continued performance by, suppliers and customers. At times, we rely on a single customer or a few customers to purchase all or a significant portion of a facility's output, in some cases under long-term agreements that account for a substantial percentage of the anticipated revenue from a given facility. Counterparties to these agreements may breach or may be material. Our subsidiaries who participateunable to perform their obligations, due to bankruptcy, insolvency, financial distress or other factors. Furthermore, in these plans are responsible for satisfying the funding requirements required by law in their respective jurisdiction for any shortfallevent of pension plan assets compareda bankruptcy or similar insolvency-type proceeding, our counterparty can seek to pension obligationsreject our existing PPA under the pension plan. ThisU.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar bankruptcy laws, including those in Puerto Rico. We may necessitate additional cash contributionsnot be able to enter into replacement agreements on terms as favorable as our existing agreements, and may have to sell power at market prices. A counterparty's breach by of a PPA or other agreement could also result in the pension plansbreach of other agreements, including the affected businesses debt agreements. Any failure of a supplier or customer to fulfill its contractual obligations could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We may incur significant expenditures to adapt to our businesses to technological changes.
Emerging technologies may be superior to, or may not be compatible with, some of our existing technologies, investments and infrastructure, and may require us to make significant expenditures to remain competitive, or may result in the obsolescence of certain of our operating assets. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and successfully adapt to technological changes, to offer services and products that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards. Technological changes that could impact our businesses include:
technologies that change the utilization of electric generation, transmission and distribution assets, including the expanded cost-effective utilization of distributed generation (e.g., rooftop solar and community solar projects), and energy storage technology;
advances in distributed and local power generation and energy storage that reduce demand for large-scale renewable electricity generation or impact our customers’ performance of long-term agreements; and
more cost-effective batteries for energy storage, advances in solar or wind technology, and advances in alternative fuels and other alternative energy sources.
Emerging technologies may also allow new competitors to more effectively compete in our markets or disintermediate the services we provide our customers, including traditional utility and centralized generation services. If we incur significant expenditures in adapting to technological changes, fail to adapt to significant technological changes, fail to obtain access to important new technologies, fail to recover a significant portion of any remaining investment in obsolete assets, or if implemented technology fails to operate as intended, our businesses, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affect the Parent Companyaffected.
Cyber-attacks and data security breaches could harm our subsidiaries' liquidity.
For additional information regarding the funding position of the Company's pension plans, see Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Pension and Other Postretirement Plans and Note 13.—Benefit Plans included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included in this Form 10-K.business.
Our business is subjectrelies on electronic systems and network technologies to substantial development uncertainties.
Certain ofoperate our subsidiariesgeneration, transmission and affiliates are indistribution infrastructure. We also use various stages of developingfinancial, accounting and constructing power plants, some but not all of which have signed long-term contractsother infrastructure systems. Our infrastructure may be targeted by nation states, hacktivists, criminals, insiders or made similar arrangements for the sale of electricity. Successful completion depends upon overcoming substantial risks, including, but not limited to, risks relating to siting, financing, engineering and construction, permitting, governmental approvals, commissioning delays, or the potential for termination of the power sales contract as a result of a failure to meet certain milestones. For additional information regarding our projects under construction see Item 1.—Business—Our Organization and Segments included in this Form 10-K.
In certain cases, our subsidiaries may enter into obligations in the development process even though the subsidiaries have not yet secured financing, power purchase arrangements,terrorist groups. Such an attack, by hacking, malware or other aspectsmeans, may interrupt our operations, cause property damage, affect our ability to control our infrastructure assets, cause the release of the developmentsensitive customer information or limit communications with third parties. Any loss or corruption of confidential or proprietary data through a breach may:

impact our operations, revenue, strategic objectives, customer and vendor relationships;

expose us to legal claims and/or regulatory investigations and proceedings;
process. For example, in certain cases, our subsidiaries may instruct contractors to begin the construction process or seek to procure equipment even where they do not have financing or a power purchase agreement in place (or conversely, to enter into a power purchase, procurement or other agreement without financing in place). If the project does not proceed, our subsidiaries may remain obligated for certain liabilities even though the project will not proceed. Development is inherently uncertainrequire extensive repair and we may forgo certain development opportunities and we may undertake significant development costs before determining that we will not proceed with a particular project. We believe that capitalizedrestoration costs for projects under development are recoverable; however, there can be no assurance that any individual project will be completedadditional security measures to avert future attacks; and reach commercial operation. If these development efforts are not successful, we may abandon a project under development
impair our reputation and write off the costs incurred in connection with such project. At the time of abandonment, we would expense all capitalized development costs incurred in connection therewithlimit our competitiveness for future opportunities.
impact our financial and could incur additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities.
In some ofaccounting systems and, subsequently, our joint venture projectsability to correctly record, process and businesses, we have granted protective rights to minority shareholders or we own less than a majority of the equity in the project or business and do not manage or otherwise control the project or business, which entails certain risks.report financial information.
We have invested in some joint ventures whereimplemented measures to help prevent unauthorized access to our subsidiaries share operational, management, investment and/or other control rightssystems and facilities, including certain measures to comply with our joint venture partners. In many cases, we may exert influence over the joint venture pursuant tomandatory regulatory reliability standards. To date, cyber-attacks have not had a management contract, by holding positions on the board of the joint venture company or on management committees and/or through certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions. However, we do not always have this type of influence over the project or business in every instance and we may be dependentmaterial impact on our joint venture partnersoperations or the management teamfinancial results. We continue to assess potential threats and vulnerabilities and make investments to address them, including global monitoring of the joint venture to operate, manage, invest or otherwise control such projects or businesses. Our joint venture partners or the management team ofnetworks and systems, identifying and implementing new technology, improving user awareness through employee security training, and updating our joint ventures may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources, management and other attributes necessary to operate these projects or businesses optimally, and they may not share our business priorities. In some joint venture agreements where we do have majority control of the voting securities, we have entered into shareholder agreements granting protective minority rights to the other shareholders.
The approval of joint venture partners also may be requiredsecurity policies as well as those for us to receive distributions of funds from jointly owned entities or to transfer our interest in projects or businesses. The control or influence exerted by our joint venture partners may result in operational management and/or investment decisions which are different from the decisions our subsidiaries would make if they operated independently and could impact the profitability and value of these joint ventures. In addition, in the event that a joint venture partner becomes insolvent or bankrupt or is otherwise unable to meet its obligations to the joint venture or its share of liabilities at the joint venture, we may be subject to joint and several liability for these joint ventures, if and to the extent provided for in our governing documents or applicable law.
Our renewable energy projects and other initiatives face considerable uncertainties, including development, operational, and regulatory challenges.
Wind, solar, and energy storage projects are subject to substantial risks. Projects of this nature have been developed through advancement in technologies which may not be proven or whose commercial application is limited, and which are unrelated to our core business. Some of these business lines are dependent upon favorable regulatory incentives to support continued investment, and there is significant uncertainty aboutthird-party providers. We cannot guarantee the extent to which such favorable regulatory incentivesour security measures will prevent future cyber-attacks and security breaches or that our insurance coverage will adequately


61 | 2020 Annual Report

cover any losses we may experience. Further, we do not control certain of joint ventures or our equity method investments and cannot guarantee that their efforts will be available in the future.
Furthermore, production levels for our wind and solar projects may be dependent upon adequate wind or sunlight resulting in volatility in production levels and profitability. For example, for our wind projects, wind resource estimates are based on historical experience when available and on wind resource studies conducted by an independent engineer, and are not expected to reflect actual wind energy production in any given year.
As a result, these types of renewable energy projects face considerable risk relative to our core business, including the risk that favorable regulatory regimes expire or are adversely modified. In addition, because certain of these projects depend on technology outside of our expertise in generation and utility businesses, there are risks associated with our ability to develop and manage such projects profitably. Furthermore, at the development or acquisition stage, because of the nascent nature of these industries or the limited experience with the relevant technologies, our ability to predict actual performance results may be hindered and the projects may not perform as predicted. There are also risks associated with the fact that some of these projects exist in markets where long-term fixed price contracts for the major cost and revenue components may be unavailable, which in turn may result in these projects having relatively high levels of volatility. Even where available, many of our renewable projects sell power under a Feed-in-Tariff, which may be eliminated or reduced, which can impact the profitability of these projects, or make money through the sale of Emission Reductions products, such as Certified Emissions


Reductions, Renewable Energy Certificates or Renewable Obligation Certificates, and the price of these products may be volatile. These projects can be capital-intensive and generally are designed with a view to obtaining third party financing, which may be difficult to obtain. As a result, these capital constraints may reduce our ability to develop these projects or obtain third party financing for these projects.
Impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets would negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and net worth.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $1.1 billion of goodwill, which represented approximately 3.2% of the total assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. We may be required to evaluate the potential impairment of goodwill outside of the required annual evaluation process if we experience situations, including but not limited to: deterioration in general economic conditions, or our operating or regulatory environment; increased competitive environment; increase in fuel costs, particularly when we are unable to pass through the impact to customers; negative or declining cash flows; loss of a key contract or customer, particularly when we are unable to replace it on equally favorable terms; divestiture of a significant component of our business; or adverse actions or assessments by a regulator. These types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment, which could substantially affect our results of operations for those periods. Additionally, goodwill may be impaired if our acquisitions do not perform as expected. See the risk factor Our acquisitions may not perform as expected for further discussion.
Long-lived assets are initially recorded at fair value and are amortized or depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment only when impairment indicators, similar to those described above for goodwill, are present, whereas goodwill is also evaluated for impairment on an annual basis.effective.
Certain of our businesses are sensitive to variations in weather.weather and hydrology.
Our businesses are affected by variations in general weather patterns and unusually severe weather. Our businesses forecast electric sales based on the basis of normalbest available information and expectations for weather, which represents a long-term historical average. While we also consider possible variations in normal weather patterns and potential impacts on our facilities and our businesses, there can be no assurance that such planning can prevent these impacts, which can adversely affect our business. Generally, demand for electricity peaks in winter and summer. Typically, when winters are warmer than expected and summers are cooler than expected, demand for energy is lower, resulting in less demand for electricity than forecasted. Significant variations from normal weather where our businesses are located could have a material impact on our results of operations.
Changes in weather can also affect the production of electricity at power generation facilities, including, but not limited to, our wind and solar facilities. For example, the level of wind resource affects the revenue produced by wind generation facilities. Because the levels of wind and solar resources are variable and difficult to predict, our results of operations for individual wind and solar facilities specifically, and our results of operations generally, may vary significantly from period to period, depending on the level of available resources. To the extent that resources are not available at planned levels, the financial results from these facilities may be less than expected. In addition, we are dependent upon hydrological conditions prevailing from time to time in the broad geographic regions in which our hydroelectric generation facilities are located. IfChanges in temperature, precipitation and snow pack conditions also could affect the amount and timing of hydroelectric generation.
To the extent that hydrological conditions result in droughts or other conditions that negatively affect our hydroelectric generation business, such as has happened in Panama in 2019, our results of operations couldcan be materially adversely affected. Additionally, our contracts in certain markets where hydroelectric facilities are prevalent may require us to purchase power in the spot markets when our facilities are unable to operate at anticipated levels and the price of such spot power may increase substantially in times of low hydrology.
Cyber-attacksSevere weather and data security breaches could adversely harmnatural disasters may present significant risks to our business.
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and natural gas and other fuels and affect the price of energy and energy-related commodities. In addition, severe weather and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, icing events, earthquakes, dam failures and tsunamis can be destructive and could prevent us from operating our business in the normal course by causing power outages and property damage, reducing revenue, affecting the availability of fuel and water, causing injuries and loss of life, and requiring us to incur additional costs, for example, to restore service and repair damaged facilities, to obtain replacement power and to access available financing sources. Our power plants could be placed at greater risk of damage should changes in the global climate produce unusual variations in temperature and weather patterns, resulting in more intense, frequent and extreme weather events, including heatwaves, fewer cold temperature extremes, abnormal levels of precipitation resulting in river and coastal urban floods in North America or reduced water availability and increased flooding across Central and South America, and changes in coast lines due to sea level change.
Depending on the nature and location of the facilities and infrastructure affected, any such incident also could cause catastrophic fires; releases of natural gas, natural gas odorant, or other greenhouse gases; explosions, spills or other significant damage to natural resources or property belonging to third parties; personal injuries, health impacts or fatalities; or present a nuisance to impacted communities. Such incidents may also impact our business partners, supply chains and transportation, which could negatively impact construction projects and our ability to provide electricity and natural gas to our customers.
A disruption or failure of electric generation, transmission or distribution systems or natural gas production, transmission, storage or distribution systems in the event of a hurricane, tornado or other severe weather event, or otherwise, could prevent us from operating our business in the normal course and could result in any of the adverse consequences described above. At our businesses where cost recovery is available, recovery of costs to restore service and repair damaged facilities is or may be subject to regulatory approval, and any determination by the regulator not to permit timely and full recovery of the costs incurred. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects.


62 | 2020 Annual Report

Our development projects are subject to substantial uncertainties.
We are in various stages of developing and constructing power plants. Certain of these power plant projects have signed long-term contracts or made similar arrangements for the sale of electricity. Successful completion of the development of these projects depends upon overcoming substantial risks, including risks relating to siting, financing, engineering and construction, permitting, governmental approvals, commissioning delays, or the potential for termination of the power sales contract as a result of a failure to meet certain milestones. In certain cases, our subsidiaries may enter into obligations in the development process even though they have not yet secured financing, PPAs, or other important elements for a successful project. For example, our subsidiaries may instruct contractors to begin the construction process or seek to procure equipment without having financing, a PPA or critical permits in place (or enter into a PPA, procurement agreement or other agreement without agreed financing). If the project does not proceed, our subsidiaries may retain certain liabilities. Furthermore, we may undertake significant development costs and subsequently not proceed with a particular project. We believe that capitalized costs for projects under development are recoverable; however, there can be no assurance that any individual project reach commercial operation. If development efforts are not successful, we may abandon certain projects, resulting in, writing off the costs incurred, expensing related capitalized development costs incurred and incurring additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities.
We do not control certain aspects of our joint ventures or our equity method investments.
We have invested in some joint ventures in which our subsidiaries share operational, management, investment and/or other control rights with our joint venture partners. In many cases, we may exert influence over the joint venture pursuant to a management contract, by holding positions on the board of the joint venture company or on management committees and/or through certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions. However, we do not always have this type of influence over the project or business is heavily reliantand we may be dependent on electronic systems and network technologiesour joint venture partners or the management team of the joint venture to operate, manage, invest or otherwise control such projects or businesses. Our joint venture partners or the management team of our generation and transmission infrastructure. We also use various financial, accountingjoint ventures may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources, management and other infrastructure systems. Our infrastructureattributes necessary to operate these projects or businesses optimally, and they may not share our business priorities. In some joint venture agreements in which we do have majority control of the voting securities, we have entered into shareholder agreements granting minority rights to the other shareholders.
The approval of joint venture partners also may be targetedrequired for us to receive distributions of funds from jointly owned entities or to transfer our interest in projects or businesses. The control or influence exerted by nation states, hacktivists, criminals, insiders or terrorist groups. Such an attackour joint venture partners may result in interruptionoperational management and/or investment decisions that are different from the decisions we would make and could impact the profitability and value of these joint ventures. In addition, if a joint venture partner becomes insolvent or bankrupt or is otherwise unable to meet its obligations to or share of liabilities for the joint venture, we may be responsible for meeting certain obligations of the joint ventures to the extent provided for in our governing documents or applicable law.
In addition, we are generally dependent on the management team of our equity method investments to operate and control such projects or businesses. While we may exert influence pursuant to having positions on the boards of such investments and/or through certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions, we do not always have this type of influence and the scope and impact of such influence may be limited. The management teams of our equity method investments may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources, management and other attributes necessary to operate these projects or businesses optimally, and they may not share our business priorities, which could have a material adverse effect on value of such investments as well as our growth, business, financial condition, results of operations property damage,and prospects.
Our renewable energy projects and other initiatives face considerable uncertainties.
Wind, solar, and energy storage projects are subject to substantial risks. Some of these business lines are dependent upon favorable regulatory incentives to support continued investment, and there is significant uncertainty about the extent to which such favorable regulatory incentives will be available in the future. In particular, in the U.S., AES’ renewable energy generation growth strategy depends in part on federal, state and local government policies and incentives that support the development, financing, ownership and operation of renewable energy generation projects, including investment tax credits, production tax credits, accelerated depreciation, renewable portfolio standards, feed-in-tariffs and similar programs, renewable energy credit mechanisms, and tax exemptions. If these policies and incentives are changed or eliminated, or AES is unable to use them, there could be a material adverse impact on AES’ U.S. renewable growth opportunities, including fewer future PPAs or lower prices in future


63 | 2020 Annual Report

PPAs, decreased revenues, reduced economic returns on certain project company investments, increased financing costs, and/or difficulty obtaining financing.
Furthermore, production levels for our wind and solar projects may be dependent upon adequate wind or sunlight resulting in volatility in production levels and profitability. For our wind projects, wind resource estimates are based on historical experience when available and on wind resource studies conducted by an independent engineer. These wind resource estimates are not expected to reflect actual wind energy production in any given year, but long-term averages of a resource.
As a result, these types of projects face considerable risk, including that favorable regulatory regimes expire or are adversely modified. At the development or acquisition stage, our ability to control our infrastructure assets, releasepredict actual performance results may be hindered and the projects may not perform as predicted. There are also risks associated with the fact that some of sensitive customer informationthese projects exist in markets where long-term fixed-price contracts for the major cost and limited communications with third parties. Any loss or corruption of confidential or proprietary data through such breach may:
impair our reputation;
impact our operations and strategic objectives;
expose us to legal claims;
revenue components may be unavailable, which in turn may result in substantial revenue loss;these projects having relatively high levels of volatility. These projects can be capital-intensive and
require extensive repair and restoration costs for additional security measures generally are designed with a view to avert future cyber-attacks.
In addition,obtaining third-party financing, which may be difficult to obtain. As a breach of our financial and accounting systems could impactresult, these capital constraints may reduce our ability to correctly record, processdevelop or obtain third-party financing for these projects.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may impact our financial results and position.
Our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results primarily from the translation exposure associated with the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as from transaction exposure associated with transactions in currencies other than an entity's functional currency. While the Consolidated Financial Statements are reported in U.S. dollars, the financial statements of several of our subsidiaries outside the U.S. are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency and translated into U.S. dollars by applying appropriate exchange rates. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currencies where our foreign subsidiaries report financial information.could cause significant fluctuations in our results. In addition, while our foreign operations expenses are generally denominated in the same currency as corresponding sales, we have transaction exposure to the extent receipts and expenditures are not denominated in the subsidiary's functional currency. Moreover, the costs of doing business abroad may increase as a result of adverse exchange rate fluctuations.
We may not be adequately hedged against our exposure to changes in commodity prices or interest rates.
We routinely enter into contracts to hedge a portion of our purchase and sale commitments for electricity, fuel requirements and other commodities to lower our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed price or indexed forward physical purchase and sales contracts, futures, financial swaps, and option contracts traded in the over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. We also enter into contracts which help us manage our interest rate exposure. However, we may not cover the entire exposure of our assets or positions to market price or interest rate volatility, and the coverage will vary over time. Furthermore, the risk management practices we have implemented measures to help prevent unauthorized access to our systems and facilities, including some measures to comply with mandatory regulatory reliability standards, and we also maintain insurance coverage to mitigate somein place may not always perform as planned. In particular, if prices of commodities or interest rates significantly deviate from historical prices or interest rates or if the price or interest rate volatility or distribution of these risks. To date,changes deviates from historical norms, our risk management practices may not protect us from significant losses. As a result, fluctuating commodity prices or interest rates may negatively impact our financial results to the extent we have unhedged or inadequately hedged positions. In addition, certain types of economic hedging activities may not seenqualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP, resulting in increased volatility in our net income. The Company may also suffer losses associated with "basis risk," which is the difference in performance between the hedge instrument and the underlying exposure (usually the pricing node of the generation facility). Furthermore, there is a risk that the current counterparties to these arrangements may fail or are unable to perform part or all of their obligations under these arrangements, while we seek to protect against that by utilizing strong credit requirements and exchange trades, these protections may not fully cover the exposure in the event of a counterparty default. For our businesses with PPA pricing that does not completely pass through our fuel costs, the businesses attempt to manage the exposure through flexible fuel purchasing and timing of entry and terms of our fuel supply agreements; however, these risk management efforts may not be successful and the resulting commodity exposure could have a material impact on these businesses and/or our results of operations.
Our utilities businesses may experience slower growth in customers or in customer usage.
Customer growth and customer usage in our utilities businesses are affected by external factors, including mandated energy efficiency measures, demand side management requirements, and economic and demographic


64 | 2020 Annual Report

conditions, such as population changes, job and income growth, housing starts, new business formation and the overall level of economic activity. A lack of growth, or a decline, in the number of customers or in customer demand for electricity may cause us to not realize the anticipated benefits from significant investments and expenditures and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Some of our subsidiaries participate in defined benefit pension plans and their net pension plan obligations may require additional significant contributions.
We have 28 defined benefit plans, five at U.S. subsidiaries and the remaining plans at foreign subsidiaries, which cover substantially all of the employees at these subsidiaries. Pension costs are based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including an expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the expected life span of pension plan beneficiaries and the discount rate used to determine the present value of future pension obligations. Any of these assumptions could prove to be incorrect, resulting in a shortfall of pension plan assets compared to pension obligations under the pension plan. We periodically evaluate the value of the pension plan assets to ensure that they will be sufficient to fund the respective pension obligations. Downturns in the debt and/or equity markets, or the inaccuracy of any of our significant assumptions underlying the estimates of our subsidiaries' pension plan obligations, could result in a material increase in pension expense and future funding requirements. Our subsidiaries that participate in these plans are responsible for satisfying the funding requirements required by law in their respective jurisdictions for any shortfall of pension plan assets as compared to pension obligations under the pension plan, which may necessitate additional cash contributions to the pension plans that could adversely affect our and our subsidiaries' liquidity. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Pension and Other Postretirement Plans and Note 15—Benefit Plans included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets would negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and net worth.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had approximately $1.1 billion of goodwill, which represented approximately 3% of our total assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. We may be required to evaluate the potential impairment of goodwill outside of the required annual evaluation process if we experience situations, such as: deterioration in general economic conditions or our operating or regulatory environment; increased competitive environment; lower forecasted revenue; increase in fuel costs, particularly costs that we are unable to pass through to customers; increase in environmental compliance costs; negative or declining cash flows; loss of a key contract or customer, particularly when we are unable to replace it on equally favorable terms; developments in our strategy; divestiture of a significant component of our business; or adverse actions or assessments by a regulator. For example, Gener's $868 million goodwill balance was considered to be "at risk" for impairment in 2020, largely due to the Chilean Government's announcement to phase out coal generation by 2040, and a cyber-attack; however we cannot guarantee that our security measures will prevent future cyber-attacks


decline in long-term energy prices. As a result of the long-lived asset impairments at Gener during the third quarter of 2020, the Company determined there was a triggering event requiring a reassessment of goodwill impairment at September 1, 2020. The Company determined the fair value of its Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 13%, and security breaches.is not currently considered "at risk". We continue to assessmonitor the Gener reporting unit for potential threatsinterim goodwill impairment triggering events. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and vulnerabilitiesAnalysisKey Trends and make investmentsUncertainties—Impairments. These types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment. Additionally, goodwill may be impaired if our acquisitions do not perform as expected. Long-lived assets are initially recorded at fair value, are amortized or depreciated over their estimated useful lives, and are evaluated for impairment only when impairment indicators, similar to address them, including global monitoringthose described above for goodwill, are present. Any impairment of networksgoodwill or long-lived assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and systems, identifying and implementing new technology, improving user awareness through employee security training, and updating security policies for the Company and its third-party providers.prospects.
Our acquisitions may not perform as expected.
Historically, acquisitions have been a significant part of our growth strategy. Westrategy and we may continue to grow our business throughmake acquisitions. Although acquired businesses may have significant operating histories, we will have a limited or no history of owning and operating many of these businesses and possibly limited or no experience operating in the country or region where these businesses are located. Some of these businesses may have been government owned and some may be operated as part of a larger integrated utility prior to their acquisition. If we were to acquire any of these types of businesses, there can be no assurance that:
that we will be successful in transitioning them to private ownership;
such businesses will perform as expected;
integrationownership or other one-time costs will not be greater than expected;
that we will not incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities;liabilities. Further, we may incur integration or
such


65 | 2020 Annual Report

other one-time costs that are greater than expected. Such businesses willmay not generate sufficient cash flow to support the indebtedness incurred to acquire them or the capital expenditures needed to develop them; or
and the rate of return from such businesses willmay not justify our decision to investinvestment of capital to acquire them.
Risks associated with Governmental Regulation and Laws
Our operations are subject to significant government regulation and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in the law or regulatory schemes.
Our ability to predict, influence or respond appropriately to changes in law or regulatory schemes, including any ability to obtainobtaining expected or contracted increases in electricity tariff or contract rates or tariff adjustments for increased expenses, could adversely impact our results of operations or our ability to meet publicly announced projections or analysts' expectations.operations. Furthermore, changes in laws or regulations or changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory provisions in jurisdictions where we operate, particularly at our utilities where electricity tariffs are subject to regulatory review or approval, could adversely affect our business, including, but not limited to:including:
changes in the determination, definition or classification of costs to be included as reimbursable or pass-through costs to be included in the rates we charge our customers, including but not limited to costs incurred to upgrade our power plants to comply with more stringent environmental regulations;
changes in the determination of what is an appropriate rate of return on invested capital or a determination that a utility's operating income or the rates it charges customers are too high, resulting in a rate reduction of rates or consumer rebates;
changes in the definition or determination of controllable or non-controllable costs;
adverse changes in tax law;
changes in law or regulation whichthat limit or otherwise affect the ability of our counterparties (including sovereign or private parties) to fulfill their obligations (including payment obligations) to us or our subsidiaries;us;
changes in environmental law whichthat impose additional costs or limit the dispatch of our generating facilities within our subsidiaries;facilities;
changes in the definition of events which may or may notthat qualify as changes in economic equilibrium;
changes in the timing of tariff increases;
other changes in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions;
other changes related to licensing or permitting which affect our ability to conduct business; or
other changes that impact the short- or long-term price-setting mechanism in the markets where we operate.our markets.
Any of the above events may resultFurthermore, in lower margins for the affected businesses, which can adversely affect our business.
In many countries where we conduct business, the regulatory environment is constantly changing and it may be difficult to predict the impact of the regulations on our businesses. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed


the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act substantially expands the regulation regarding the trading, clearing and reporting of derivative transactions, and the Dodd-Frank Act provides for commercial end-user exemptions which may apply to our derivative transactions. However, even with the exemption, the Dodd-Frank Act could still have a material adverse impact on the Company, as the regulation of derivatives (which includes capital and margin requirements for non-exempt companies), could limit the availability of derivative transactions that we use to reduce interest rate, commodity and currency risks, which would increase our exposure to these risks. The impacts described above could also result from our (or our subsidiaries') efforts to comply with European Market Infrastructure Regulation, which includes regulations related to the trading, reporting and clearing of derivatives. It is also possible that additionalderivatives and similar regulations may be passed in other jurisdictions where we conduct business. Any of these outcomesthe above events may result in lower operating margins and financial results for the affected businesses.
Several of our businesses are subject to potentially significant remediation expenses, enforcement initiatives, private party lawsuits and reputational risk associated with CCR.
CCR generated at our current and former coal-fired generation plant sites, is currently handled and/or has been handled by: placement in onsite CCR ponds; disposal and beneficial use in onsite and offsite permitted, engineered landfills; use in various beneficial use applications, including encapsulated uses and structural fill; and used in permitted offsite mine reclamation. CCR currently remains onsite at several of our facilities, including in CCR ponds. The EPA's final CCR rule provides that enforcement actions can be commenced by the EPA, states, or territories, and private lawsuits. Compliance with the U.S. federal CCR rule; amendments to the federal CCR rule; or federal, state, territory, or foreign rules or programs addressing CCR may require us to incur substantial costs. In addition, the Company and our businesses may face CCR-related lawsuits in the United States and/or internationally that may expose us to unexpected potential liabilities. Furthermore, CCR-related litigation may also expose us to unexpected costs. In addition, CCR, and its production at several of our facilities, have been the subject of significant interest from environmental non-governmental organizations and have received national and local media attention. The direct and indirect effects of such media attention, and the demands of responding to and addressing it, may divert management time and attention. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company.our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects.
Our business in the United States is


66 | 2020 Annual Report

Some of our U.S. businesses are subject to the provisions of various laws and regulations administered in whole or in part by the FERC and NERC, including PURPA, the Federal Power Act, and the EPAct 2005. Actions by the FERC, NERC and by state utility commissions that can have a material effect on our operations.
SeveralThe AES Corporation is a registered electric holding company under the PUHCA 2005 as enacted as part of our generation businessesthe EPAct 2005. PUHCA 2005 eliminated many of the restrictions that had been in place under the U.S. Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, while continuing to provide FERC and state utility commissions with enhanced access to the books and records of certain utility holding companies. PUHCA 2005 also creates additional potential challenges and opportunities. By removing some barriers to mergers and other potential combinations, the creation of large, geographically dispersed utility holding companies is more likely. These entities may have enhanced financial strength and therefore an increased ability to compete with us in the U.S. currently operate QFs as defined under PURPA. These businesses entered into long-term contracts with electric utilities that had a mandatory obligation under PURPA to purchase power from QFs atU.S..
Other parts of the utility's avoided cost (i.e., the costs for both energy and capital investment that would have been incurred by the purchasing utility if that utility had to provide its own generating capacity or purchase it from another source). EPAct 2005 authorizes theallow FERC to eliminateremove the obligation of electricPURPA purchase/sale obligations from utilities under Section 210 of PURPAif there are adequate opportunities to entersell into new contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity from or to QFs if certain market conditions are met. Pursuant to this authority, thecompetitive markets. FERC has institutedexercised this power with a rebuttable presumption that utilities located within the control areas of MISO, PJM, , ISO New England, Inc., the New York Independent System Operator, Inc., and ERCOT are not required to purchase or sell power from or to QFs above a certain size. In addition,Additionally, FERC has the FERC is authorized under EPAct 2005power to remove the purchase/sale obligations of individual utilities on a case-by-case basis. While this law doesthese changes do not affect existing contracts, as a resultcertain of the changes to PURPA, our QFs may facethat have had sales contracts expire are now facing a more difficult market environment when their current long-termand that is likely to continue for other AES QFs with existing contracts expire.that will expire over time.
EPAct 2005 repealed PUHCA 1935 and enacted PUHCA 2005 in its place. PUHCA 1935 had the effect of requiring utility holding companies to operate in geographically proximate regions and therefore limited the range of potential combinations and mergers among utilities. By comparison, PUHCA 2005 has no such restrictions and simply provides the FERC and state utility commissions with enhanced access to the books and records of certain utility holding companies. The repeal of PUHCA 1935 removed barriers to mergers and other potential combinations which could result in the creation of large, geographically dispersed utility holding companies. These entities may have enhanced financial strength and therefore an increased ability to compete with us in the U.S. generation market.
In accordance with Congressional mandates in the EPAct 1992 and now in EPAct 2005, the FERC has strongly encouragedencourages competition in wholesale electric markets. Increased competition may have the effect of lowering our operating margins. Among other steps, the FERC has encouraged RTOs and ISOs to develop demand response bidding programs as a mechanism for responding to peak electric demand. These programs may reduce the value of our peaking assets which rely on very high prices during a relatively small number of hours to recover their costs.generation assets. Similarly, the FERC is encouraging the construction of new transmission infrastructure in accordance with provisions of EPAct 2005. Although new transmission lines may increase market opportunities, they may also increase the competition in our existing markets.
While the FERC continues to promote competition, some state utility commissions have reversed course and begun to encourage the construction of generation facilities by traditional utilities to be paid for on a cost-of-service basis by retail ratepayers. Such actions have the effect of reducing sale opportunities in the competitive wholesale generating markets in which we operate.
FERC has civil penalty authority over violations of any provision of Part II of the FPA, which concerns wholesale generation or transmission, as well as any rule or order issued thereunder. The FPA also provides for the assessment of criminal fines and imprisonment for violations under the FPA. This penalty authority was enhanced in EPAct 2005. As a result, FERC is authorized to assess a maximum penalty authority established by statute and such penalty authority has been and will continue to be adjusted periodically to account for inflation. With this expanded enforcement authority, violations of the FPA and FERC's regulations could potentially have more serious consequences than in the past.
Pursuant to EPAct 2005, the NERC has been certified by FERC as the Electric Reliability Organization ("ERO")ERO to develop mandatory and enforceable electric system reliability standards applicable throughout the U.S. to improve the overall reliability of the electric grid. These standards are subject to FERC review and approval.


Once approved, the reliability standards may be enforced by FERC independently, or, alternatively, by the ERO and regional reliability organizations with responsibility for auditing, investigating and otherwise ensuring compliance with reliability standards, subject to FERC oversight. Violations of NERC reliability standards are subject to FERC's penalty authority under the FPA and EPAct 2005.
Our U.S. utility businesses in the U.S. face significant regulation by their respective state utility commissions. The regulatory discretion is reasonably broad in both Indiana and Ohio and includes regulation as to services and facilities, the valuation of property, the construction, purchase, or lease of electric generating facilities, the classification of accounts, rates of depreciation, the increase or decrease in retail rates and charges, the issuance of certain securities, the acquisition and sale of some public utility properties or securities and certain other matters. These businesses face the risk of unexpected or adverse regulatory action which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. See Item 1.Business—US SBU—U.S. Businesses—U.S.and Utilities SBU for further information on the regulation faced by our U.S. utilities..
Our businesses are subject to stringent environmental laws, rules and regulations.
Our businesses are subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations by many federal, regional, state and local authorities, international treaties and foreign governmental authorities. These laws and regulations generally concern emissions into the air, effluents into the water, use of water, wetlands preservation, remediation of contamination, waste disposal, endangered species and noise regulation, among others.regulation. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations or to obtain or comply with any necessaryassociated environmental permits pursuant to such laws and regulations could result in fines or other sanctions. Environmental laws


67 | 2020 Annual Report

For example, in recent years, the EPA has issued NOVs to a number of coal-fired generating plants alleging wide-spread violations of the new source review and regulations affectingprevention of significant deterioration provisions of the CAA. The EPA has brought suit against and obtained settlements with many companies for allegedly making major modifications to a coal-fired generating units without proper permit approvals and without installing best available control technology. The primary focus of these NOVs has been emissions of SO2 and NOx and the EPA has imposed fines and required companies to install improved pollution control technologies to reduce such emissions. In addition, state regulatory agencies and non-governmental environmental organizations have pursued civil lawsuits against power generation and distribution are complex andplants in situations that have tended to become more stringent over time.resulted in judgments and/or settlements requiring the installation of expensive pollution controls or the accelerated retirement of certain electric generating units.
Furthermore, Congress and other domestic and foreign governmental authorities have either considered or implemented various laws and regulations to restrict or tax certain emissions, particularly those involving air emissions and water discharges. See the various descriptions of these laws and regulations contained in Item 1.—Business of this Form 10-K. These laws and regulations have imposed, and proposed laws and regulations could impose in the future, additional costs on the operation of our power plants. See Item 1.—Business—Environmental and Land-Use Regulations.
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant capital and other expenditures to comply with these and other environmental laws and regulations. Changes in, or new development of, environmental restrictions may force the Companyus to incur significant expenses or expenses that may exceed our estimates. There can be no assurance that we would be able to recover all or any increased environmental costs from our customers or that our business, financial condition, including recorded asset values or results of operations, would not be materially and adversely affected by such expenditures or any changes in domestic or foreign environmental laws and regulations.affected.
Our businesses are subject to enforcement initiatives from environmental regulatory agencies.
The EPA has pursued an enforcement initiative against coal-fired generating plants alleging wide-spread violations of the new source review and prevention of significant deterioration provisions of the CAA. The EPA has brought suit against a number of companies and has obtained settlements with many of these companies over such allegations. The allegations typically involve claims that a company made major modifications to a coal-fired generating unit without proper permit approval and without installing best available control technology. The principal, but not exclusive, focus of this EPA enforcement initiative is emissions of SO2 and NOx. In connection with this enforcement initiative, the EPA has imposed fines and required companies to install improved pollution control technologies to reduce emissions of SO2 and NOx. In addition to EPA enforcement, state regulatory agencies and non-governmental environmental organizations have pursued civil lawsuits against power plants in situations where the EPA has not taken such action. These civil suits have resulted in judgments and/or settlements that require the installation of expensive pollution controls or the accelerated retirement of certain electric generating units. There can be no assurance that foreign environmental regulatory agencies or environmental organizations in countries in which our subsidiaries operate will not pursue similar enforcement initiatives under relevant laws and regulations.
Regulators, politicians, non-governmental organizations and other private parties have expressed concernConcerns about greenhouse gas, or GHG emissions and the potential risks associated with climate change have led to increased regulation and are takingother actions whichthat could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.businesses.
As discussed in Item 1.—Business, at the international,International, federal and various regional and state levels, rules are in effect and policies are under development toauthorities regulate GHG emissions thereby effectively imposing a cost on such emissions in order to createand have created financial incentives to reduce them. In 2017,2020, the Company's subsidiaries operated businesses whichthat had total CO2 emissions of approximately 62.8847 million metric tonnes, approximately 28.716 million of which were emitted by our U.S. businesses located in the U.S. (both figures are ownership adjusted). The Company uses CO2 emission estimation methodologies supported by "The Greenhouse Gas Protocol" reporting standard on GHG


emissions. For existing power generation plants, CO2emissions data are either obtained directly from plant continuous emission monitoring systems or calculated from actual fuel heat inputs and fuel type CO2 emission factors. The estimated annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric power generation facilities of the Company's subsidiaries that are in construction or development and have received the necessary air permits for commercial operations are approximately 10.34 million metric tonnes (ownership adjusted). This overall estimate is based on a number of projections and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, such as the forecasted dispatch, anticipated plant efficiency, fuel type, CO2 emissions rates and our subsidiaries' achieving completion of such construction and development projects. However, it is certain thatWhile actual emissions may vary substantially; the projects under construction or development when completed will increase emissions of our portfolio and therefore could increase the risks associated with regulation of GHG emissions. Because there
There currently is significant uncertainty regarding these estimates, actualno U.S. federal legislation imposing mandatory GHG emission reductions (including for CO2) that affects our electric power generation facilities; however, in 2015, the EPA promulgated a rule establishing New Source Performance Standards for CO2 emissions for newly constructed and modified/reconstructed fossil-fueled electric utility steam generating units larger than 25 MW and in 2018 proposed revisions to the rule. In 2019, the EPA promulgated the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule which establishes heat rate improvement measures as the best system of emissions reductions for existing coal-fired electric generating units. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded to EPA the ACE Rule although the parties have the opportunity to request a rehearing at the D.C. Circuit or seek a review of the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. The impact of this decision and potential new or revised rules from these projects underthe current Administration remains uncertain. In 2010, the EPA adopted regulations pertaining to GHG emissions that require new and existing sources of GHG emissions to potentially obtain new source review permits from the EPA prior to construction or development may vary substantially from these estimates.
The non-utility, generation subsidiariesmodification. In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that such permitting would only be required if such sources also must obtain a new source review permit for increases in other regulated pollutants. For further discussion of the Company often seek to pass on any costs arising from CO2 emissions to contract counterparties, but there can be no assurance that such subsidiaries of the Company will effectively pass such costs onto the contract counterparties or that the cost and burden associated with any dispute over which party bears such costs would not be burdensome and costly to the relevant subsidiaries of the Company. The utility subsidiaries of the Company may seek to pass on any costs arising from CO2 emissions to customers, but there can be no assurance that such subsidiaries of the Company will effectively pass such costs to the customers, or that they will be able to fully or timely recover such costs.
Foreign, federal, state or regional regulation of GHG emissions, could havesee Item 1.Business—Environmental and Land-Use Regulations—U.S.Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations—Greenhouse Gas Emissions above. The Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change's Paris Agreement established a material adverselong-term goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. We anticipate that the Paris Agreement will continue the trend toward efforts to decarbonize the global economy and to further limit GHG emissions. The impact of GHG regulation on the Company's financial performance. The actual impact on the Company's financial performance and the financial performance of the Company's subsidiariesour operations will depend on a number of factors, including among others, the degree and timing of GHG emissions


68 | 2020 Annual Report

reductions required under any such legislation or regulation, the cost of emissions reduction equipment and the price and availability of offsets, the extent to which market based compliance options are available, the extent to which our subsidiaries would be entitled to receive GHG emissions allowances without having to purchase them in an auction or on the open market and the impact of such legislation or regulation on the ability of our subsidiaries to recover costs incurred through rate increases or otherwise. As a result of these factors, our costThe costs of compliance could be substantial and could have a material adverse impactsubstantial.
Our non-utility, generation subsidiaries seek to pass on any costs arising from CO2 emissions to contract counterparties. Likewise, our results of operations.
In January 2005, basedutility subsidiaries seek to pass on European Community "Directive 2003/87/EC on Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading,"any costs arising from CO2 emissions to customers. However, there can be no assurance that we will effectively pass such costs onto the EU ETS commenced operation as the largest multi-country GHG emission trading scheme in the world. On February 16, 2005, the Kyoto Protocol became effective. The Kyoto Protocol requires all developed countries that have ratified it to substantially reduce their GHG emissions, including CO2. However, the United States never ratified the Kyoto Protocol and, to date, compliance with the Kyoto Protocol and the EU ETS has not had a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In December 2015, the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ("UNFCCC") convened for the 21st Conference of the Parties in Paris, France. The result was the so-called Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement has a long-term goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. In furtherance of this goal, participating countries submitted comprehensive national climate action plans and have agreed to meet every five years to set more ambitious targets as required by science, to report to each other and the public on how well they are doing to implement their targets and to track progress towards the long-term goal through a robust transparency and accountability system. We anticipatecontract counterparties or customers, respectively, or that the Paris Agreement will continue the trend toward efforts to de-carbonize the global economycost and to further limit GHG emissions, including in those countries where the Company does business. It is difficult to predict the nature, timing and scope of such regulation but it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance.
In the U.S., there currently is no federal legislation imposing mandatory GHG emission reductions (including for CO2) affecting the electric power generation facilities of the Company's subsidiaries. However, in 2011, the EPA adopted regulations pertaining to GHG emissions that require new and existing sources of GHG emissions to potentially obtain new source review permits from the EPA prior to construction or modification, but only if they also must obtain a new source review permit for increases in other regulated pollutants. Additionally, in 2015, the EPA promulgated a rule establishing New Source Performance Standards for CO2 emissions for newly constructed and modified/reconstructed fossil-fueled EUSGUs larger than 25 MW. Also in 2015, the EPA promulgated the CPP,burden associated with any dispute over which is applicable to preexisting EUSGUs, and requires interim reductions beginning in 2022, with full compliance achieved by 2030. Under the CPP, states are required to develop and submit plans that establish performance standards or, through emissions trading programs, otherwise meet a state-wide emissions rate average or mass-based goal. These actions have been challenged in Court and the current Administration has announced plans to significantly amend or rescind the rules. For further discussion of the regulation of GHG emissions, including the


U.S. Supreme Court's issued order staying implementation of the CPP, and the EPA's proposal to rescind the CPP, see Item 1.Business—Environmental and Land-Use Regulations—United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations—Greenhouse Gas Emissions above.
Such regulations, and in particular regulations applying to modified or existing EUSGUs, could increase our costs directly and indirectly and have a material adverse effect on our business and/or results of operations. See Item 1.—Business of this Form 10-K for further discussion about these environmental agreements, laws and regulations.
At the state level, the RGGI, a cap-and-trade program covering CO2 emissions from electric power generation facilities in the Northeast, became effective in January 2009, and California has adopted comprehensive legislation and regulation that requires GHG reductions from multiple industrial sectors, including the electric power generation industry. At this time, other than with regard to RGGI (further described below) and proposed Hawaii regulations relating to the collection of fees on GHG emissions, the impact of both of which we do not expect to be material, the Company cannot estimate the costs of compliance with U.S. federal, regional or state GHG emissions reduction legislation or initiatives, due to the fact that most of these proposals are not being actively pursued or are in the early stages of development and any final regulations or laws, if adopted, could vary drastically from current proposals; in the case of California, we anticipate no material impact due to the fact that we expectparty bears such costs willwould not be passed through to our offtakers under the terms of existing tolling agreements.burdensome and costly.
The auctions of RGGI allowances needed by power generators to comply with state programs implementing RGGI occur approximately every quarter. Our subsidiary in Maryland is our only subsidiary that was subject to RGGI in 2017. Of the approximately 28.7 million metric tonnes of CO2 emitted in the United States by our subsidiaries in 2017 (ownership adjusted), approximately 1.2 million metric tonnes were emitted by our subsidiary in Maryland. The Company estimates that the RGGI compliance costs could be approximately $3.5 million for 2018. There is a risk that our actual compliance costs under RGGI will differ from our estimates by a material amount and that our model could underestimate our costs of compliance.
In addition to government regulators, othermany groups, such asincluding politicians, environmentalists, the investor community and other private parties have expressed increasing concern about GHG emissions. For example, certain financial institutions have expressed concern about providing financing forNew regulation, such as the initiatives in Chile, Hawaii, and the Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act, may adversely affect our operations. See Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Decarbonization Initiatives. Responding to these decarbonization initiatives, including developments in our strategy in line with these initiatives may present challenges to our business. We may be unable to develop our renewables platform as quickly as anticipated. Further, we may be unable to dispose of coal-fired generation assets at anticipated prices, the estimated useful lives of these assets may decrease, and the value of such assets may be impaired. These initiatives could also result in the early retirement of coal-fired generation facilities, which would emit GHGs, which can affectcould result in stranded costs if regulators disallow full recovery of investments.
Negative public perception of our GHG emissions could have an adverse effect on our relationships with third parties, our ability to obtain capital, or if we can obtain capital,attract additional customers, our business development opportunities, and our ability to receive it on commercially viable terms. Further, rating agencies may decide to downgradeaccess finance and insurance for our credit ratings based on the emissions of the businesses operated by our subsidiaries or increased compliance costs which could make financing unattractive. coal-fired generation assets.
In addition, plaintiffs havepreviously brought tort lawsuits that were dismissed against the Company because of its subsidiaries' GHG emissions. While the litigation mentioned has been dismissed, it is impossible to predict whetherFuture similar future lawsuits are likely tomay prevail or result in damages awards or other relief. Consequently, it is impossibleWe may also be subject to determine whether such lawsuitsrisks associated with the impact on weather conditions. See Certain of our businesses are likelysensitive to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operationsvariations in weather and financial condition.
Furthermore, accordinghydrology and Severe weather and natural disasters may present significant risks to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, physical risks from climate change could include, but are not limited to, increased runoff and earlier spring peak discharge in many glacier and snow-fed rivers, warming of lakes and rivers, an increase in sea level, changes and variability in precipitation and in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events. Physical impacts may have the potential to significantly affect the Company'sour business and operations, and any such potential impact may render it more difficult for our businesses to obtain financing. For example, extreme weather events could result in increased downtime and operation and maintenance costs at the electric power generation facilities and support facilities of the Company's subsidiaries. Variations in weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity also would be expected to affect the energy needs of customers. A decrease in energy consumption could decrease the revenues of the Company's subsidiaries. In addition, while revenues would be expected to increase if the energy consumption of customers increased, such increase could prompt the need for additional investment in generation capacity. Changes in the temperature of lakes and rivers and changes in precipitation that result in drought could adversely affect the operations of the fossil fuel-fired electric power generation facilities of the Company's subsidiaries. Changes in temperature, precipitation and snow pack conditions also could affect the amount and timing of hydroelectric generation.
In addition to potential physical risks noted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, there could be damage to the reputation of the Company due to public perception of GHG emissions by the Company's subsidiaries, and any such negative public perception or concerns could ultimately result in a decreased demandour financial results within this section for electric power generation or distribution from our subsidiaries. The level of GHGs emitted by subsidiaries of the Company is not a factor in the compensation of executives of the Company.


more information. If any of the foregoing risks materialize, costs may increase or revenues may decrease and there could be a material adverse effect on the electric power generation businesses of the Company's subsidiaries and on the Company's consolidatedour results of operations, financial condition,cash flows and cash flows.reputation.
Concerns about data privacy have led to increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses.
In the ordinary course of business, we collect and retain sensitive information, including personal identification information about customers and employees, customer energy usage and other information. The theft, damage or improper disclosure of sensitive electronic data collected by us can subject us to penalties for violation of applicable privacy laws, subject us to claims from third parties, require compliance with notification and monitoring regulations, and harm our reputation. Any actual or perceived failure to comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the California Privacy Rights Act, the California Consumer Privacy Act, the General Data Privacy Law in Brazil or other data privacy laws or regulations, or related contractual or other obligations, or any perceived privacy rights violation, could lead to investigations, claims, and proceedings by governmental entities and private parties, damages for contract breach, and other significant costs, penalties, and other liabilities, as well as harm to our reputation and market position. In addition, any actual or perceived failure on the part of one of our equity affiliates could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and prospects.
Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.us
Our subsidiaries have operationsWe operate in the U.S. and various non-U.S. jurisdictions. As such, wejurisdictions and are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the U.S. federal, state and local governments and of many non-U.S. jurisdictions. From time to time, legislative measures may be enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax positions regarding income or other taxes. There can be no assurance thattaxes, our effective tax rate or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these legislative measures.
payments. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Act") enacted December 22, 2017TCJA introduced significant changes to current U.S. federal tax law, including but not limited to lowering the corporate income tax rate, introducing new limits on interest expense deductibility, and changing the way in which foreign earnings are taxed.law. These changes are complex, and are subject to additional guidance to be issued by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, the reaction to the federal tax changes by the individual states is still evolving. Our interpretations and assumptions around U.S. tax reform may evolve in future periods, as further administrative guidance and regulations are issued, which may materially affect our effective tax rate or tax payments. For further details, please seeAdditionally, President Biden proposed in his campaign platform changes to the corporate and U.S. individual tax system, including a possible increase in the corporate tax rate and the rate of


69 | 2020 Annual Report

tax non-U.S. earnings are subject to, that may introduce additional complexity or materially affect our effective tax rate or tax payments. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties in this Form 10-K..
Additionally, longstanding international tax norms that determine how and where cross-border international trade is subjected to tax are evolving. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD"),OECD, in coordination with the G8 and G20, through its initial Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project (“BEPS") introduced a series of recommendations that many tax jurisdictions have adopted, or may adopt in the future, as law. In 2019, the OECD announced an expansion of these efforts in the form of a two-pillar approach that would create new nexus rules without reference to physical presence (Pillar One) and introduce a global minimum tax (Pillar Two). Blueprints for Pillar One and Pillar Two were released in the fourth quarter of 2020, with a stated goal of bringing the project to a conclusion by mid-2021.As these and other tax laws, related regulations and double-tax conventions change, our financial results could be materially impacted. Given the unpredictability of these possible changes and their potential interdependency, it is very difficult to assess whether the overall effect of such potential tax changes would be cumulatively positive or negative for our earnings and cash flow, but suchflow. Such changes could adverselyhave a material adverse impact our results of operations.
U.S. federal, stateRisks Related to our Indebtedness and Financial Condition
We have a significant amount of debt.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $20 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis. All outstanding borrowings under The AES Corporation's revolving credit facility are unsecured. Most of the debt of The AES Corporation's subsidiaries, however, is secured by substantially all of the assets of those subsidiaries. A substantial portion of cash flow from operations must be used to make payments on our debt. Furthermore, since a significant percentage of our assets are used to secure this debt, this reduces the amount of collateral available for future secured debt or credit support and reduces our flexibility in operating these secured assets. This level of indebtedness and related security could have other consequences, including:
making it more difficult to satisfy debt service and other obligations;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse industry and economic conditions, including adverse changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices;
reducing available cash flow to fund other corporate purposes and grow our business;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged; and
limiting, along with financial and other restrictive covenants relating to such indebtedness, our ability to borrow additional funds, pay cash dividends or repurchase common stock.
The agreements governing our indebtedness, including the indebtedness of our subsidiaries, limit, but do not prohibit the incurrence of additional indebtedness. If we were to become more leveraged, the risks described above would increase. Further, our actual cash requirements may be greater than expected and our cash flows may not be sufficient to repay all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due. In that event, we may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, raise equity or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms to refinance our debt as it becomes due. In addition, our ability to refinance existing or future indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at that time. Any refinancing of our debt could result in higher interest rates or more onerous covenants that restrict our business operations. See Note 11Debt included in Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for a schedule of our debt maturities.
The AES Corporation's ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness is dependent upon the receipt of funds from our subsidiaries.
The AES Corporation is a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries. Almost all of The AES Corporation's cash flow is generated by the operating activities of its subsidiaries. Therefore, The AES Corporation's ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund its other obligations is dependent not only on the ability of its subsidiaries to generate cash, but also on the ability of the subsidiaries to distribute cash to it in the form of dividends, fees, interest, tax sharing payments, loans or otherwise.Our subsidiaries face various restrictions in their ability to distribute cash. Most of the subsidiaries are obligated, pursuant to loan agreements, indentures or non-recourse financing arrangements, to satisfy certain restricted payment covenants or other conditions before they may make distributions. Business performance and local accounting and tax rules may also limit dividend distributions. Subsidiaries in foreign countries may also be prevented from distributing funds as wella result of foreign governments restricting the repatriation of funds or the conversion of currencies. Our subsidiaries


70 | 2020 Annual Report

are separate and distinct legal entities and, unless they have expressly guaranteed The AES Corporation's indebtedness, have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to such debt or to make any funds available whether by dividends, fees, loans or other payments.
Existing and potential future defaults by subsidiaries or affiliates could adversely affect us.
We attempt to finance our domestic and foreign projects through non-recourse debt or "non-recourse financing" that requires the loans to be repaid solely from the project's revenues and provide that the repayment of the loans (and interest thereon) is secured solely by the capital stock, physical assets, contracts and cash flow of that project subsidiary or affiliate. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $20 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis, of which approximately $3.4 billion was recourse debt of the Parent Company and approximately $16.4 billion was non-recourse debt. In some non-recourse financings, the Parent Company has explicitly agreed, in the form of guarantees, indemnities, letters of credit, letter of credit reimbursement agreements and agreements to pay, to undertake certain limited obligations and contingent liabilities, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events.
Certain of our subsidiaries are in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total debt classified as non-U.S., tax lawscurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to such defaults was $276 million as of December 31, 2020. While the lenders under our non-recourse financings generally do not have direct recourse to the Parent Company, such defaults under non-recourse financings can:
reduce the Parent Company's receipt of subsidiary dividends, fees, interest payments, loans and regulationsother sources of cash because a subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to the Parent Company during the pendency of any default;
trigger The AES Corporation's obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit or other credit support provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;
trigger defaults in the Parent Company's outstanding debt. For example, The AES Corporation's revolving credit facility and outstanding senior notes include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries and relating to accelerations of outstanding material debt of material subsidiaries or any subsidiaries that in the aggregate constitute a material subsidiary; or
result in foreclosure on the assets that are extremely complexpledged under the non-recourse financings, resulting in write-downs of assets and subjecteliminating any and all potential future benefits derived from those assets.
None of the projects that are in default are owned by subsidiaries that, individually or in the aggregate, meet the applicable standard of materiality in The AES Corporation's revolving credit facility or other debt agreements to varying interpretations.trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under such indebtedness. However, as a result of future mix of distributions, write-down of assets, dispositions and other changes to our financial position and results of operations, one or more of these subsidiaries, individually or in the aggregate, could fall within the applicable standard of materiality and thereby upon an acceleration of such subsidiary's debt, trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of Parent Company indebtedness.
The AES Corporation has significant cash requirements and limited sources of liquidity.
The AES Corporation requires cash primarily to fund: principal repayments of debt, interest, dividends on our common stock, acquisitions, construction and other project commitments, other equity commitments (including business development investments); equity repurchases; taxes and Parent Company overhead costs. Our principal sources of liquidity are: dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries, proceeds from financings at the Parent Company, and proceeds from asset sales. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis —Capital Resources and Liquidity. We believe that these sources will be adequate to meet our obligations for the foreseeable future, based on a number of material assumptions about access the capital or commercial lending markets, the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, exchange rates, our ability to sell assets, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions; however, there can be no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that our actual cash requirements will not be greater than expected. In addition, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay our debt obligations at maturity and we may have to refinance such obligations. There can be no assurance that our tax positionswe will be sustained if challengedsuccessful in obtaining such refinancing on acceptable terms.
Our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to raise capital on favorable terms.
We rely on the capital markets as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by relevantoperating cash


71 | 2020 Annual Report

flows. Our ability to arrange for financing on either a recourse or non-recourse basis and the costs of such capital are dependent on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, including: general economic and capital market conditions; the availability of bank credit; the availability of tax authoritiesequity partners; the financial condition, performance and ifprospects of AES as well as our competitors; and changes in tax and securities laws. Should access to capital not sustained, therebe available to us, we may have to sell assets or cease further investments, including the expansion or improvement of existing facilities, any of which would affect our future growth.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of The AES Corporation or its subsidiaries could adversely affect our access to the capital markets, interest expense, liquidity or cash flow.
If any of the credit ratings of the The AES Corporation and its subsidiaries were to be downgraded, our ability to raise capital on favorable terms could be a material impact on our results of operations.
Weimpaired and our affiliates are subjectborrowing costs could increase. Furthermore, counterparties may no longer be willing to material litigation and regulatory proceedings.
We andaccept general unsecured commitments by The AES Corporation to provide credit support. Accordingly, we may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit and/or collateral, to backstop or replace any credit support by The AES Corporation, which reduces our affiliates are parties to material litigation and regulatory proceedings. See Item 3.—Legal Proceedings below.available credit. There can be no assurancesassurance that the outcomecounterparties will accept such guarantees or other assurances.
The market price of suchour common stock may be volatile.
The market price and trading volumes of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to factors including general economic conditions, conditions in our industry and our markets, environmental and economic developments, and general credit and capital markets conditions, as well as developments specific to us, including risks described in this section, failing to meet our publicly announced guidance or key trends and other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.described in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We maintain offices in many places around the world, generally pursuant to the provisions of long- and short-term leases, none of which we believe are material. With a few exceptions, our facilities, which are described in Item 1Business of this Form 10-K, are subject to mortgages or other liens or encumbrances as part of the project's related finance facility. In addition, the majority of our facilities are located on land that is leased. However, in a few instances, no accompanying project financing exists for the facility, and in a few of these cases, the land interest may not be subject to any encumbrance and is owned outright by the subsidiary or affiliate.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in certain claims, suits and legal proceedings in the normal course of business. The Company has accrued for litigation and claims wherewhen it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes, based upon information it currently possesses and taking into account established reserves for estimated liabilities and its insurance coverage, that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings and actions is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. It is reasonably possible, however, that some matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company and could require the Company to pay damages or make expenditures in amounts that could be material, but cannot be estimated as of December 31, 2017.


2020.
In December 2001, Grid Corporation of Odisha (“GRIDCO”) served a notice to arbitrate pursuant to the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on the Company, AES Orissa Distribution Private Limited (“AES ODPL”), and Jyoti Structures (“Jyoti”) pursuant to the terms of the shareholders agreement between GRIDCO, the Company, AES ODPL, Jyoti and the Central Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Ltd. (“CESCO”), an affiliate of the Company. In the arbitration, GRIDCO asserted that a comfort letter issued by the Company in connection with the Company's indirect investment in CESCO obligates the Company to provide additional financial support to cover all of CESCO's financial obligations to GRIDCO. GRIDCO appeared to be seeking approximately $189 million in damages, plus undisclosed penalties and interest, but a detailed alleged damage analysis was not filed by GRIDCO. The Company counterclaimed against GRIDCO for damages. In June 2007, a 2-to-1 majority of the arbitral tribunal rendered its award rejecting GRIDCO's claims and holding that none of the respondents, the Company, AES ODPL, or Jyoti, had any liability to GRIDCO. The respondents' counterclaims were also rejected. A majority of the tribunal later awarded the respondents, including the Company, some of their costs relating to the arbitration. GRIDCO filed challenges of the tribunal's awards with the local Indian court. GRIDCO's challenge of the costs award has been dismissed by the


72 | 2020 Annual Report

court, but its challenge of the liability award remains pending. A hearing on the liability award is scheduled for March 15, 2018.has not taken place to date. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it and will defend itself vigorously in these proceedings; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In January 2012, the Brazil Federal Tax Authority issued an assessment allegingPursuant to their environmental audit, AES Sul and AES Florestal discovered 200 barrels of solid creosote waste and other contaminants at a pole factory that AES TietêFlorestal had paid PISbeen operating. The conclusion of the audit was that a prior operator of the pole factory, Companhia Estadual de Energia (“CEEE”), had been using those contaminants to treat the poles that were manufactured at the factory. On their initiative, AES Sul and COFINS taxes from 2007AES Florestal communicated with Brazilian authorities and CEEE about the adoption of containment and remediation measures. In March 2008, the State Attorney of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil filed a public civil action against AES Sul, AES Florestal and CEEE seeking an order requiring the companies to 2010 at a lower rate thanmitigate the tax authority believed was applicable. AES Tietê challenged the assessmentcontaminated area located on the grounds thatof the tax rate was set inpole factory and an indemnity payment of approximately R$6 million ($1 million). In October 2011, the applicable legislation. In April 2013,State Attorney filed a request for an injunction ordering the FIACdefendant companies to contain and remove the contamination immediately. The court granted injunctive relief on October 18, 2011, but determined that AES Tietê should have calculatedonly CEEE was required to perform the taxes atremoval work. In May 2012, CEEE began the higher rateremoval work in compliance with the injunction. The case is now awaiting judgment. The removal and that AES Tietê was liable for unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties totalingremediation costs are estimated to be approximately R$1.17 billion10 million to R$41 million ($3532 million to $8 million), and there could be additional costs which cannot be estimated at this time. In June 2016, the Company sold AES Sul to CPFL Energia S.A. and as estimated by AES Tietê. AES Tietê appealed to the SIAC. In January 2015, the SIAC issued a decision in AES Tietê's favor, finding that AES Tietê was not liable for unpaid taxes. The public prosecutor subsequently filed an appeal, which was denied as untimely. The Tax Authority thereafter filed a motion for clarificationpart of the SIAC's decision, which was denied in September 2016.sale, AES Guaiba, a holding company of AES Sul, retained the potential liability relating to this matter. The Tax Authority later filed a special appeal (“Special Appeal”), which was rejected as untimely in October 2016. The Tax Authority thereafter filed an interlocutory appeal with the Superior Administrative Court (“SAC”). In March 2017, the President of the SAC determinedCompany believes that the SAC would analyze the Special Appeal on timeliness and, if required, the merits. AES Tietê has challenged the Special Appeal. AES Tietê believes it hasthere are meritorious defenses to the claimclaims asserted against it and will defend itself vigorously in these proceedings; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In January 2015,February 2017, the EPA issued a NOV for DPL received NOVs from the EPAStuart Station, alleging violations of opacity atin 2016. On May 31, 2018, Stuart Station was retired, and Killen Stations, and inon December 20, 2019, it was transferred to an unaffiliated third-party purchaser, along with the associated environmental liabilities.
In October 2015, IPL received a similar NOV alleging violations at Petersburg Station. In February 2017, the EPA issued a second NOV for DPL Stuart Station, alleging violations of opacity in 2016. Moreover,addition, in February 2016, IPL received an NOV from the EPA alleging violations of NSR and other CAA regulations, the Indiana SIP, and the Title V operating permit at Petersburg Station. ItOn August 31, 2020, IPL reached a settlement with the EPA, the DOJ and IDEM, resolving these purported violations of the CAA at Petersburg Station. The settlement agreement, in the form of a proposed judicial consent decree, includes, among other items, the following requirements: annual caps on NOx and SO2 emissions and more stringent emissions limits than IPL's current Title V air permit; payment of civil penalties totaling $1.5 million; a $5 million environmental mitigation project consisting of the construction and operation of a new, non-emitting source of generation at the site; expenditure of $0.3 million on a state-only environmentally beneficial project to preserve local, ecologically-significant lands; and retirement of Units 1 and 2 prior to July 1, 2023. If IPL does not meet the retirement obligation, it must install a Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction System on Unit 4. The proposed Consent Decree is too earlysubject to determine whetherfinal review and approval by the NOVs could haveU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, following a material impact30-day public comment period, which began upon publication in the Federal Register. On January 14, 2021, the United States and Indiana, on our business, financial condition or resultsbehalf of our operations. IPL would seek recovery of any operating or capital expenditures, but not fines or penalties, relatedEPA and IDEM, respectively, filed a motion asking the court to air pollution control technologyenter the proposed Consent Decree, along with the United States’ response to reduce regulated air emissions; however, there can be no assurances that we would be successful in this regard.the adverse public comments on the proposed settlements.
In September 2015, AES Southland Development, LLC and AES Redondo Beach, LLC filed a lawsuit against the California Coastal Commission (the “CCC”) over the CCC's determination that the site of AES Redondo Beach included approximately 5.93 acres of CCC-jurisdictional wetlands. The CCC has asserted that AES Redondo Beach has improperly installed and operated water pumps affecting the alleged wetlands in violation of the California Coastal Act and Redondo Beach Local Coastal Program and has ordered AES Redondo Beach to restore the site. Additional potentialProgram. Potential outcomes of the CCC determination could include an order requiring AES Redondo Beach to fundperform a wetland mitigation projectrestoration and/or pay fines or penalties. AES Redondo Beach believes that it has meritorious arguments and intends to vigorously prosecute such lawsuit,concerning the underlying CCC determination, but there can be no assurances that it will be successful.
In October 2015, Ganadera Guerra, S.A. On March 27, 2020, AES Redondo Beach, LLC sold the site to an unaffiliated third-party purchaser that assumed the obligations contained within these proceedings. On May 26, 2020, CCC staff sent AES a Notice of Violation (NOV) directing AES to submit a Coastal Development Permit (“GG”CDP”) and Constructora Tymsa, S.A. (“CT”) filed separate lawsuits against AES Panama inapplication for the local courts of Panama. The claimants allege that AES Panama profited from a hydropower facility (La Estrella) being partially located on land owned initially by GG and currently by CT, and that AES Panama must pay compensation for its useremoval of the land.water pumps within the alleged wetlands. AES has submitted the CDP to the permitting authority, the City of Redondo Beach (“the City”), with respect to AES’s plans to disable or remove the pumps. The damages sought fromNOV also directed AES Panama are approximately $685 million (GG)to submit technical analysis regarding additional water pumps located within onsite electrical vaults and $100 million (CT). Ina CDP application for their continued operation. AES has responded to the CCC, providing the requested analysis and seeking further discussion with the agency regarding the CDP. On October 2016,14, 2020, the court dismissed GG's claim because of GG's failureCity deemed the CDP application to comply withbe complete and indicated a court order requiring GG to disclose certain information. GG has refiled its lawsuit. Also, there are ongoing administrative proceedings concerning whether AES Panama is entitled to acquire an easement over the land and whether AES Panama can continue to occupy the land. AES Panama believes it has


meritorious defenses and claims and will assert them vigorously; however, there can be no assurances that itpublic hearing will be successful in its efforts.required, at which


73 | 2020 Annual Report

time AES must present additional information and analysis on the pumps within the alleged wetlands and the onsite electrical vaults.
In January 2017, the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (“SMA”) issued a Formulation of Charges asserting that Alto Maipo is in violation of certain conditions of the Environmental Approval Resolution (“RCA”) governing the construction of Alto Maipo’s hydropower project, for, among other things, operating vehicles at unauthorized times and failing to mitigate the impact of water intrusioninfiltration during tunnel construction.construction (“Infiltration Water”). In February 2017, Alto Maipo submitted a compliance plan (“Compliance Plan”) to the SMA which, if approved by the agency, would resolve the matter without materially impacting construction of the project. In June 2017, the SMA issued a resolution detailing its comments on the compliance plan. Alto Maipo responded to the SMA’s comments in July 2017. In JanuaryApril 2018, the SMA requested additional information from Alto Maipo relating toapproved the compliance plan and Formulation of Charges. In FebruaryCompliance Plan (“April 2018 Alto Maipo submitted certain information toApproval”). Among other things, the SMA, which is under consideration by the agency. The outcome of this matter is uncertain, but an adverse decisionCompliance Plan as approved by the SMA couldrequires Alto Maipo to obtain from the Environmental Evaluation Service (“SEA”) a definitive interpretation of the RCA’s provisions concerning the authorized times to operate certain vehicles. In addition, Alto Maipo must obtain the SEA’s final approval concerning the control, discharge, and treatment of Infiltration Water. Alto Maipo continues to seek the relevant final approvals from the SEA. A number of lawsuits have a negative impact onbeen filed in relation to the April 2018 Approval, some of which are still pending. To date, none of the lawsuits have negatively impacted the April 2018 Approval or the construction of the project. If Alto Maipo complies with the requirements of the Compliance Plan, and if the above-referenced lawsuits are dismissed, the Formulation of Charges will be discharged without penalty. Otherwise, Alto Maipo could be subject to penalties, and the construction of the project could be negatively impacted. Alto Maipo will pursue its interests vigorously in this matter;these matters; however, there can be no assuranceassurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In June 2017, Alto Maipo terminated one of its contractors, Constructora Nuevo Maipo S.A. (“CNM”), given CNM’s stoppage of tunneling works, its failure to produce a completion plan, and its other breaches of contract. Also, Alto Maipo also initiateddrew $73 million under letters of credit (“LC Funds”) in connection with its termination of CNM. Alto Maipo is pursuing arbitration against CNM to recover excess completion costs and other damages totaling at least $236 million (net of the LC Funds) relating to these breaches.CNM’s breaches (“First Arbitration”). CNM subsequently initiated a separate arbitration, seekingdenies liability and seeks a declaration that its termination was wrongful, damages that it alleges result from that termination, and other relief. CNM has not supported its alleged damages, but it has assertedalleges that it is entitled to recover over $20damages ranging from $70 million in damages, legalto $170 million (which include the LC Funds) plus interest and costs, and approximately $73 million that was drawn bybased on various scenarios. Alto Maipo under letters of credit.has contested these submissions. The arbitrations haveevidentiary hearing in the First Arbitration took place May 20-31, 2019, and closing arguments were heard June 9-10, 2020. The parties are now awaiting the Tribunal’s decision in the First Arbitration. Also, in August 2018, CNM purported to initiate a separate arbitration against AES Gener and the Company (“Second Arbitration”). In the Second Arbitration, CNM seeks to pierce Alto Maipo’s corporate veil and appears to seek an award holding AES Gener and the Company jointly and severally liable to pay any alleged net amounts that are found to be due to CNM in the First Arbitration or otherwise. The Second Arbitration has been consolidated into a single action.the First Arbitration. The evidentiaryarbitral tribunal has bifurcated the Second Arbitration to determine in the first instance the jurisdictional objections raised by AES Gener and the Company to CNM’s piercing claims. The hearing ison the jurisdictional objections, which was previously scheduled for May 20-31, 2019. In the interim, CNM requested that the arbitral Tribunal issue an order requiringOctober 2020, has been postponed to a date to be determined. Each of Alto Maipo, to immediately return or escrowAES Gener, and the letter of credit funds. In February 2018, the Tribunal denied CNM’s request for interim relief. However, the ultimate merits of CNM’s arbitration claims will be decided after the May 2018 hearing, including in relation to the letters of credit. In addition, CNM is attempting to seek relief in the Chilean court of appeals concerning the draws on the letters of credit. That action is pending. Alto MaipoCompany believes it has meritorious claims andand/or defenses and will assert them vigorously in these proceedings;pursue its interests vigorously; however, there can be no assurances that each will be successful in its efforts.
In October 2017, the Maritime Prosecution Office from Valparaíso issued a ruling alleging responsibility by AES Gener for the presence of coal waste on Ventanas beach, and proposed a fine before the Maritime Governor, of approximately $380,000. AES Gener submitted its statement of defense, denying the allegations. An evidentiary stage was concluded and then re-opened by order of the Maritime Governor on February 5, 2019 to allow AES Gener an opportunity to present reports and other evidence to challenge the grounds of the ruling. AES Gener has completed its presentation of evidence and awaits the Maritime Prosecution Office’s decision of the case. AES Gener believes that it has meritorious defenses to the allegations; however, there are no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.defending this action.
In October 2017, the Ministry of Justice (“MOJ”) of the Republic of Kazakhstan (“ROK”) filedDecember 2018, a lawsuit was filed in the Specialized Economic Court of Eastern-Kazakhstan Region (“Economic Court”)Dominican Republic civil court against Tau Power BV (an AES affiliate), Altai Power LLP (an AES affiliate), the Company, AES Puerto Rico, and two hydropower plants (“HPPs”) previously under concessionthree other AES affiliates. The lawsuit purports to Tau Power. In its lawsuit, the MOJ references a 2013 treaty arbitration award (“2013 Award”) against the ROK concerning the ROK’s energy laws. While its lawsuit is unclear, the MOJbe brought on behalf of over 100 Dominican claimants, living and deceased, and appears to seek relief relating to CCRs that were delivered to the net income distributed byDominican Republic in 2004. The lawsuit generally alleges that the HPPs during certain yearsCCRs caused personal injuries and deaths and demands $476 million in alleged damages. The lawsuit does not identify, or provide any supporting information concerning, the alleged injuries of the concession period. In November 2017,claimants individually. Nor does the Economic Court issued a decisionlawsuit provide any information supporting the demand for damages or explaining how the quantum was derived. The relevant AES companies believe that purports to allow the MOJ to enforce the 2013 Award in Kazakhstan. The decision was affirmed on intermediate appeal. The AES defendantsthey have appealedmeritorious defenses to the Kazakhstan Supreme Court. The AES defendants believe that the lawsuit is without meritclaims asserted against them and they will assert their defenses vigorously;defend themselves vigorously in this proceeding; however, there can be no assurances that they will be successful in their efforts.


74 | 2020 Annual Report

In February 2019, a separate lawsuit was filed in Dominican Republic civil court against the Company, AES Puerto Rico, two other AES affiliates, and an unaffiliated company and its principal. The lawsuit purports to be brought on behalf of over 200 Dominican claimants, living and deceased, and appears to seek relief relating to CCRs that were delivered to the Dominican Republic in 2003 and 2004. The lawsuit generally alleges that the CCRs caused personal injuries and deaths and demands $900 million in alleged damages. The lawsuit does not identify, or provide any supporting information concerning, the alleged injuries of the claimants individually. Nor does the lawsuit provide any information supporting the demand for damages or explaining how the quantum was derived. In August 2020, at the request of the relevant AES companies, the case was transferred to a different civil court. The relevant AES companies believe that they have meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against them and will defend themselves vigorously in this proceeding; however, there can be no assurances that they will be successful in their efforts.
In October 2019, the Superintendency of the Environment (the "SMA") notified AES Gener of certain alleged breaches associated with the environmental permit of the Ventanas Complex, initiating a sanctioning process through Exempt Resolution N° 1 / ROL D-129-2019. The alleged charges include exceeding generation limits, failing to reduce emissions during episodes of poor air quality, exceeding limits on discharges to the sea, and exceeding noise limits. As the charges are currently classified, the maximum fine is approximately $6.5 million. On October 14, 2019, the SMA notified AES Gener of other alleged breaches at the Guacolda Complex under Exempt Resolution N° 1 / ROL D-146-2019. These allegations include failure to comply with all measures to mitigate atmospheric emissions, failure to comply with mitigation measures to avoid solid fuel discharges to the sea, failure to perform temperature monitoring in intake and water discharge at Unit 3, and a one-day exceedance of the seawater discharge limits. As the Guacolda charges are currently classified, the maximum fine is approximately $4 million. For each complex, additional fines are possible if the SMA determines that non-compliance resulted in an economic benefit. AES Gener has submitted proposed "Compliance Programs" to the SMA for the Ventanas Complex and the Guacolda Complex, respectively. In August 2020, the Compliance Program for Guacolda Complex was approved by the SMA. Upon successful execution of the Compliance Program, the process is expected to conclude without sanctions and to not generate further actions. If the Ventanas Complex submission is approved by the SMA and satisfactorily fulfilled by AES Gener, the process is also expected to conclude without sanctions and to not generate further action.
In March 2020, Mexico’s Comisión Federal de Electricidad (“CFE”) served an arbitration demand upon AES Mérida III. CFE makes allegations that AES Mérida III is in breach of its obligations under a power and capacity purchase agreement ("Contract") between the two parties, which allegations relate to CFE’s own failure to provide fuel within the specifications of the Contract. CFE seeks to recover approximately $190 million in payments made to AES Merida under the Contract as well as approximately $431 million in alleged damages for having to acquire power from alternative sources in the Yucatan Peninsula. AES Mérida has filed an answer denying liability to CFE and asserting a counterclaim for damages due to CFE’s breach of its obligations. The parties submitted their respective initial briefs and supporting evidence in December 2020. After additional briefing, the evidentiary hearing will take place in November 2021. AES Mérida believes that it has meritorious defenses and claims and will assert them vigorously in the arbitration; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.




75 | 2020 Annual Report

PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Stock Repurchase Program — The Board authorization permits the Parent Company to repurchase stock through a variety of methods, including open market repurchases and/or privately negotiated transactions. There can be no assurances as to the amount, timing or prices of repurchases, which may vary based on market conditions and other factors. The Stock Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date and can be modified or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time. The cumulative repurchaserepurchases from the commencement of the Stock Repurchase Program in July 2010 through December 31, 2017 is2020 totaled 154.3 million shares atfor a total cost of $1.9 billion, at an average price per share of $12.12 (including a nominal amount of commissions). As of December 31, 2017, $2462020, $264 million remained available for repurchase under the Stock Repurchase Program. No repurchases were made by The AES Corporation of its common stock during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Parent Company repurchased 8,686,983in 2020, 2019, and 39,684,131 shares of its common stock in 2016 and 2015, respectively.2018.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NYSENew York Stock Exchange under the symbol "AES." The closing price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE on February 21, 2018, was $10.23 per share. The following tables present the high and low intraday sale prices of our common stock and cash dividends declared for the indicated periods.
 2017 2016
 Sales Price Cash Dividends Sales Price Cash Dividends
 High Low Declared High Low Declared
First Quarter$12.06
 $10.93
 $0.12
 $11.80
 $8.22
 $0.11
Second Quarter12.05
 10.95
 
 12.48
 10.49
 
Third Quarter11.66
 10.60
 0.12
 13.32
 11.85
 0.11
Fourth Quarter11.34
 10.00
 0.25
 12.75
 10.98
 0.23
Dividends
The Parent Company commenced a quarterly cash dividend in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Parent Company has increased this dividend annually and the quarterly per-share cash dividenddividends for the last three years are displayed below.
Commencing the fourth quarter of202020192018
Cash dividend$0.1505$0.1433$0.1365
Commencing the fourth quarter of 2017 2016 2015
Cash dividend $0.13 $0.12 $0.11
The fourth quarter 20172020 cash dividend is to be paid in the first quarter of 20182021. There can be no assurance that the AES Board will declare a dividend in the future or, if declared, the amount of any dividend. Our ability to pay dividends will also depend on receipt of dividends from our various subsidiaries across our portfolio.
Under the terms of our senior securedrevolving credit facility, which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate, we have limitations on our ability to pay cash dividends and/or repurchase stock. Our subsidiaries' ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is also subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans, governmental provisions and other agreements to which our subsidiaries are subject. See the information contained under Item 12.—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans of this Form 10-K.
Holders
As of February 21, 2018,22, 2021, there were approximately 4,1203,771 record holders of our common stock.



76 | 2020 Annual Report


Performance Graph
THE AES CORPORATION
PEER GROUP INDEX/STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE


aes-20201231_g15.jpg
Source: Bloomberg
We have selected the Standard and Poor's ("S&P") 500 Utilities Index as our peer group index. The S&P 500 Utilities Index is a published sector index comprising the 28 electric and gas utilities included in the S&P 500.
The five year total return chart assumes $100 invested on December 31, 20122015 in AES Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Utilities Index. The information included under the heading Performance Graph shall not be considered "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our selected financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. This data should be read together with Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K. The selected financial data for each of the years in the five year period ended December 31, 20172020 have been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior period amounts have been restated to reflect discontinued operations in all periods presented. Prior to July 1, 2014, a discontinued operation was a component of the Company that either had been disposed of or was classified as held-for-sale and where the Company did not expect to have significant cash flows or significant continuing involvement with the component as of one year after its disposal or sale. Effective July 1, 2014, the Company adopted new accounting guidance under which the Company reports a business as discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results when the business is sold or classified as held-for-sale. Please refer to Note 1 in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further explanation. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.
Acquisitions, disposals, reclassifications, and changes in accounting principles affect the comparability of information included in the tables below. Please refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further explanation of the effect of such activities. Please also refer to Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K and Note 25—28—Risks and Uncertainties to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and


Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for certain risks and uncertainties that may cause the data reflected herein not to be indicative of our future financial condition or results of operations.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Statement of Operations Data for the Years Ended December 31:(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue$10,530
 $10,281
 $11,260
 $12,604
 $12,051
Income (loss) from continuing operations (1)
(148) 191
 682
 941
 751
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax(507) (20) 318
 678
 264
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax(654) (1,110) (12) 91
 (150)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(1,161) $(1,130) $306
 $769
 $114
Per Common Share Data         
Basic earnings (loss) per share:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax$(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
 $0.94
 $0.36
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax(0.99) (1.68) (0.01) 0.13
 (0.21)
Basic earnings (loss) per share$(1.76) $(1.72) $0.45
 $1.07
 $0.15
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax$(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
 $0.94
 $0.35
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax(0.99) (1.68) (0.02) 0.12
 (0.20)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$(1.76) $(1.72) $0.44
 $1.06
 $0.15
Dividends Declared Per Common Share$0.49
 $0.45
 $0.41
 $0.25
 $0.17
Cash Flow Data for the Years Ended December 31:         
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,489
 $2,884
 $2,134
 $1,791
 $2,715
Net cash used in investing activities(2,749) (2,108) (2,366) (656) (1,774)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities43
 (747) 28
 (1,262) (1,136)
Total (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(295) 26
 (231) (119) (253)
Cash and cash equivalents, ending949
 1,244
 1,218
 1,517
 1,636
Balance Sheet Data at December 31: 
Total assets$33,112
 $36,124
 $36,545
 $38,676
 $40,100
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)13,176
 13,731
 12,184
 12,077
 11,486
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)—Discontinued operations
 758
 772
 1,226
 1,629
Recourse debt (noncurrent)4,625
 4,671
 4,966
 5,047
 5,485
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries837
 782
 538
 78
 78
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)(2,276) (1,146) 143
 512
 (150)
The AES Corporation stockholders' equity2,465
 2,794
 3,149
 4,272
 4,330
_____________________________
(1)
Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $537 million, $1.1 billion, $602 million, $383 million, and $596 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Note 8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
77 | 2020 Annual Report



Selected Financial Data
20202019201820172016
Statement of Operations Data for the Years Ended December 31:(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue$9,660 $10,189 $10,736 $10,530 $10,281 
Income (loss) from continuing operations (1)
149 477 1,349 (148)191 
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax43 302 985 (507)(20)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax (2)
218 (654)(1,110)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$46 $303 $1,203 $(1,161)$(1,130)
Per Common Share Data     
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.06 $0.46 $1.49 $(0.77)$(0.04)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 — 0.33 (0.99)(1.68)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.07 $0.46 $1.82 $(1.76)$(1.72)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.06 $0.45 $1.48 $(0.77)$(0.04)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 — 0.33 (0.99)(1.68)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.07 $0.45 $1.81 $(1.76)$(1.72)
Dividends Declared Per Common Share$0.58 $0.55 $0.53 $0.49 $0.45 
Cash Flow Data for the Years Ended December 31:
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,755 $2,466 $2,343 $2,504 $2,897 
Net cash used in investing activities(2,295)(2,721)(505)(2,599)(2,136)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(78)(86)(1,643)43 (747)
Total increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash255 (431)215 (172)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, ending1,827 1,572 2,003 1,788 1,960 
Balance Sheet Data at December 31:
Total assets$34,603 $33,648 $32,521 $33,112 $36,124 
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)15,005 14,914 13,986 13,176 13,731 
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)—Discontinued operations— — — — 758 
Recourse debt (noncurrent)3,446 3,391 3,650 4,625 4,671 
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries872 888 879 837 782 
Accumulated deficit(680)(692)(1,005)(2,276)(1,146)
The AES Corporation stockholders' equity2,634 2,996 3,208 2,465 2,794 
_____________________________
(1)Includes pre-tax gains on sales of business interests of $28 million, $984 million, and $29 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2016, respectively, and pre-tax losses of $95 million and $52 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2017, respectively; pre-tax impairment expense of $864 million, $185 million, $208 million, $537 million, and $1.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively; other-than-temporary impairment of equity method investments of $202 million, $92 million. and $147 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively; income tax expense of $194 million and $675 million related to the one-time transition tax on foreign earnings, and income tax benefit of $77 million and expense of $39 million related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively; and net equity in losses of affiliates, primarily at Guacolda, of $123 million and $172 million, for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 25—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions, Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense, Note 8—Investments in and Advances to AffiliatesandNote 23—Income Taxesincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
(2)Includes gain on sale of $199 million and loss on deconsolidation of $611 million related to Eletropaulo for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and impairment expense of $382 million and loss on sale of $737 million related to Sul for the year ended December 31, 2016. See Note 24—Discontinued Operationsincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.


78 | 2020 Annual Report

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Summary
Diluted lossIn 2020, AES delivered on or exceeded all strategic and financial objectives. We completed construction of 2.3 GW of new projects and signed long-term PPAs for 3 GW of renewable capacity. Fluence, our joint venture with Siemens, maintained its leading global market share with 1 GW of projects delivered or awarded in 2020. Finally, following our efforts to reduce recourse debt, our Parent Company's credit rating was upgraded to investment grade by S&P. See Overview of our Strategy included in Item 1.—Business of this Form 10-K for further information.
Compared with last year, diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.77, an increase of $0.73 compareddecreased $0.39, from $0.45 to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to a one-time transition tax$0.06. This decrease reflects higher impairments and losses on foreign earnings following the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Actsales in the fourth quarter of 2017. This impact was partially offsetcurrent period, lower contributions from DP&L primarily driven by lower impairment expense, primarily at DPL in the US SBU. Adjusted EPS, a non-GAAP financial measure, for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $0.14 to $1.08, reflecting higher margins, primarily at the MCAC SBU, and contributions from new businesses in the U.S. and MCAC. 
Strategic Priorities
As a result of our efforts to decrease our exposure to coal-fired generation and increase our portfolio of renewables, energy storage, and natural gas capacity, we are significantly reducing our carbon intensity. In 2017, AES and AIMCo completed the joint acquisition of sPower, the largest independent solar developer in the United States. In addition, we announced the sale or retirement of 4.5 GW of mostly merchant coal-fired generation, representing 31% of our coal-fired capacity.
In February 2018, we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio, optimize our cost structure, and reduce our carbon intensity. Reflecting this simplified portfolio, we will manage our global operations separate from our growth and commercial activities.
Overview of 2017 Results and Strategic Performance
Earnings Per Share and Free Cash Flow Results in 2017 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Years Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations$(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
Adjusted EPS (a non-GAAP measure) (1)
1.08
 0.94
 1.24
Net cash provided by operating activities2,489
 2,884
 2,134
Free Cash Flow (a non-GAAP measure) (1)
1,921
 2,244
 1,628
_____________________________
(1)
See reconciliation and definition under SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures.
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations increased to a loss per share of $0.77 primarily due to a higher effective tax rateregulated rates as a result of the U.S. Tax Reform Law enacted on December 22, 2017,changes in the ESP, lower demand at IPL and DP&L due to milder weather, lower contributions from Colombia due to drier hydrology and lower generation due to a life extension project at Chivor, and prior year net insurance recoveries; partially offset by prior year impairmentslower income tax expense, and higher contributions from Chile due to net gains from early contract terminations at DPL.Angamos and a positive impact due to incremental capitalized interest, from Brazil due to a favorable revision to the GSF liability, from Panama due to higher availability and improved hydrology, and in the U.S. due to commencement of operations of the Southland Energy CCGTs and a gain on sale of land.
Adjusted EPS, a non-GAAP measure, increased $0.08, from $1.36 to $1.44, mainly due to higher availability and improved hydrology in Panama, commencement of operations of the Southland Energy CCGTs and a gain on sale of land in the U.S., a favorable revision to the GSF liability in Brazil, a lower adjusted tax rate, and a positive impact in Chile due to incremental capitalized interest; partially offset by 15% to $1.08lower contributions from our utilities in the U.S. primarily driven by higher margins at our MCAC SBU,lower regulated rates as a result of the changes in DP&L's ESP and lower demand due to milder weather, lower contributions from new solar projects in the US,Colombia due to drier hydrology and lower generation due to a one-time allowance on a non-trade receivable recognized in 2016,life extension project at Chivor, and the favorable impact of the YPF legal settlement at AES Uruguaiana, which was partially offset by higher adjusted effective tax rate.prior year net insurance recoveries.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by 14% to $2.5 billion primarily driven the collection of $360 million of overdue receivables at Maritza in 2016 and additional investments in working capital at Eletropaulo of $189 million. These decreases were partially offset by the $98 million increase in operating margin, excluding non cash drivers, at the Andes SBU.

Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP measure, decreased by 14% to $1.9 billion primarily driven by a $395 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities.


79 | 2020 Annual Report


Review of Consolidated Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31,202020192018% Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2019 vs. 2018
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
US and Utilities SBU$3,918 $4,058 $4,230 -3 %-4 %
South America SBU3,159 3,208 3,533 -2 %-9 %
MCAC SBU1,766 1,882 1,728 -6 %%
Eurasia SBU828 1,047 1,255 -21 %-17 %
Corporate and Other231 46 41 NM12 %
Eliminations(242)(52)(51)NM%
Total Revenue9,660 10,189 10,736 -5 %-5 %
Operating Margin:
US and Utilities SBU638 754 733 -15 %%
South America SBU1,243 873 1,017 42 %-14 %
MCAC SBU559 487 534 15 %-9 %
Eurasia SBU186 188 227 -1 %-17 %
Corporate and Other120 39 58 NM-33 %
Eliminations(53)NM100 %
Total Operating Margin2,693 2,349 2,573 15 %-9 %
General and administrative expenses(165)(196)(192)-16 %%
Interest expense(1,038)(1,050)(1,056)-1 %-1 %
Interest income268 318 310 -16 %%
Loss on extinguishment of debt(186)(169)(188)10 %-10 %
Other expense(53)(80)(58)-34 %38 %
Other income75 145 72 -48 %NM
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests(95)28 984 NM-97 %
Asset impairment expense(864)(185)(208)NM-11 %
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)55 (67)(72)NM-7 %
Other non-operating expense(202)(92)(147)NM-37 %
Income tax expense(216)(352)(708)-39 %-50 %
Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates(123)(172)39 -28 %NM
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS149 477 1,349 -69 %-65 %
Loss from operations of discontinued businesses, net of income tax expense of $0, $0, and $2, respectively— — (9)— %-100 %
Gain from disposal of discontinued businesses, net of income tax expense of $0, $0, and $44, respectively225 NM-100 %
NET INCOME152 478 1,565 -68 %-69 %
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(106)(175)(364)-39 %-52 %
Less: Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — %-100 %
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$46 $303 $1,203 -85 %-75 %
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
Income from continuing operations, net of tax$43 $302 $985 -86 %-69 %
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax218 NM-100 %
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$46 $303 $1,203 -85 %-75 %
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,755 $2,466 $2,343 12 %%
Years Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 % Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2016 vs. 2015
(in millions, except per share amounts)     
Revenue:   
US SBU$3,229
 $3,429
 $3,593
 -6 % -5 %
Andes SBU2,710
 2,506
 2,489
 8 % 1 %
Brazil SBU542
 450
 962
 20 % -53 %
MCAC SBU2,448
 2,172
 2,353
 13 % -8 %
Eurasia SBU1,590
 1,670
 1,875
 -5 % -11 %
Corporate and Other35
 77
 31
 -55 % NM
Intersegment eliminations(24) (23) (43) -4 % 47 %
Total Revenue10,530
 10,281
 11,260
 2 % -9 %
Operating Margin:         
US SBU567
 582
 621
 -3 % -6 %
Andes SBU658
 634
 618
 4 % 3 %
Brazil SBU203
 186
 397
 9 % -53 %
MCAC SBU589
 523
 543
 13 % -4 %
Eurasia SBU423
 429
 452
 -1 % -5 %
Corporate and Other23
 15
 33
 53 % -55 %
Intersegment eliminations1
 11
 (1) 91 % NM
Total Operating Margin2,464
 2,380
 2,663
 4 % -11 %
General and administrative expenses(215) (194) (196) 11 % -1 %
Interest expense(1,170) (1,134) (1,145) 3 % -1 %
Interest income244
 245
 256
  % -4 %
Loss on extinguishment of debt(68) (13) (182) NM
 -93 %
Other expense(57) (79) (24) -28 % NM
Other income120
 64
 84
 88 % -24 %
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses(52) 29
 29
 NM
  %
Goodwill impairment expense
 
 (317)  % -100 %
Asset impairment expense(537) (1,096) (285) -51 % NM
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)42
 (15) 106
 NM
 NM
Income tax expense(990) (32) (412) NM
 -92 %
Net equity in earnings of affiliates71
 36
 105
 97 % -66 %
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(148) 191
 682
 NM
 -72 %
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses(18) 151
 80
 NM
 89 %
Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued operations(611) (1,119) 
 -45 % NM
NET INCOME (LOSS)(777) (777) 762
  % NM
Noncontrolling interests:         
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(359) (211) (364) 70 % -42 %
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests(25) (142) (92) -82 % 54 %
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(1,161) $(1,130) $306
 3 % NM
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:      
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax$(507) $(20) $318
 NM
 NM
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(654) (1,110) (12) -41 % NM
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(1,161) $(1,130) $306
 3 % NM
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,489
 $2,884
 $2,134
 -14 % 35 %
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE$0.49
 $0.45
 $0.41
 9 % 10 %

Components of Revenue, Cost of Sales and Operating Margin — Revenue includes revenue earned from the sale of energy from our utilities and the production and sale of energy from our generation plants, which are classified as regulated and non-regulated, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revenue also includes the gains or losses on derivatives associated with the sale of electricity.
Cost of sales includes costs incurred directly by the businesses in the ordinary course of business. Examples include electricity and fuel purchases, operations and maintenance costs, depreciation and amortization expense,expenses, bad debt expense and recoveries, and general administrative and support costs (including employee-related costs


directly associated with the operations of the business). Cost of sales also includes the gains or losses on derivatives (including embedded derivatives other than foreign currency embedded derivatives) associated with the purchase of electricity or fuel.
Operating margin is defined as revenue less cost of sales.


80 | 2020 Annual Report

Consolidated Revenue and Operating Margin
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 20172020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenue
(in millions)

aes-20201231_g16.jpg
Consolidated RevenueRevenue increased $249decreased $529 million, or 2%5%, in 20172020 compared to 20162019. Excluding the unfavorable FX impact of $182 million, primarily in South America, this decrease was driven by:
$276229 million in MCACEurasia driven by the sale of the Northern Ireland businesses in June 2019 and lower generation in Vietnam;
$140 million in US and Utilities mainly driven by a decrease in energy pass-through rates and lower demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic in El Salvador, lower regulated rates as a result of the changes in DP&L's ESP, lower retail sales demand at IPL and DPL primarily due to milder weather and COVID-19 pandemic impacts, and decreased capacity sales, at Southland due to unit retirements, and at DPL due to the sale and closure of generation facilities. These decreases were partially offset by increased capacity sales at Southland Energy due to the commencement of the PPAs; and
$88 million in MCAC mainly driven by lower generation and volume pass-through fuel revenue in Mexico, the disconnection of the Estrella del Mar I power barge from the grid in Panama, and lower market prices, spot sales and demand in both the Dominican Republic and at the Colon combined cycle operations at Los Minafacility in June 2017 as well asPanama. These decreases were partially offset by higher ratesLNG sales in the Dominican Republic, and higher pass through costsdriven by the Eastern Pipeline COD in El Salvador,2020.
These unfavorable impacts were partially offset by hurricane impacts at Puerto Rico; and
$204an increase of $115 million in AndesSouth America driven by revenue recognized at Angamos for the early termination of contracts with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence and recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile, partially offset by drier hydrology and lower generation in Colombia due to a life extension project being performed at the Chivor hydro plant, lower pass-through coal prices, spot prices, and lower generation in Chile, and lower energy and capacity prices (Resolution 31/2020) in Argentina.


81 | 2020 Annual Report

Operating Margin
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g17.jpg
Consolidated Operating MarginOperating margin increased $344 million, or 15%, in 2020 compared to 2019. Excluding the unfavorable impact of FX of $50 million, primarily in South America, this increase was driven by:
$423 million in South America primarily due to the start of commercial operations at Cochranedrivers discussed above, as well as a $184 million favorable revision to the GSF liability at Tietê related to the passage of a regulation providing concession extensions to hydro plants as compensation for prior period non-hydrological risk charges incorrectly assessed by the regulator; and
$72 million in MCAC mostly due to higher availability at Argentina,Changuinola due to the tunnel lining upgrade in 2019, improved hydrology in Panama, and higher LNG sales in the Dominican Republic, partially offset by lower spot salesprior year insurance recoveries associated with the lightning incident at Chivor.the Andres facility in 2018, current year outage due to Andres steam turbine failure, and the disconnection of the Estrella del Mar I power barge from the grid in Panama.
These positivefavorable impacts were partially offset by a decrease of $200$116 million in the U.S. mainlyUS and Utilities mostly due to lower regulated rates as a result of the changes in DP&L's ESP, lower retail tariffs as well assales demand at DPL and IPL primarily due to milder weather and COVID-19 pandemic impacts, lower wholesale volumecapacity sales due to the retirement of units at Southland, a favorable revision to the ARO at DPL, and pricecost recoveries from DPL's joint owners of Stuart and Killen in 2019, partially offset by increased capacity sales at DPL.
Consolidated Operating MarginOperating margin increased $84 million, or 4%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by:
The favorable impact of FX of $39 million, primarily in Brazil, Argentina, and Colombia.
Excluding the FX impact mentioned above:
$65 million in MCACSouthland Energy due to the commencement of the Los Mina combined cycle operations in June 2017 in the Dominican Republic as well as higher availability due to forced outages in 2016 at Mexico.
These positive impacts were partially offset by a decrease of $15 million in the U.S. driven by lower retail margin, lower volumes,PPAs, and lower commercial availabilitydepreciation expense at DPL as well as a negative impact at IPL mainly due to one-off accrualsSouthland due to the implementationextension of new base rates in Q2 2016.the water board permits.
Year Ended December 31, 20162019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenue
(in millions)

aes-20201231_g18.jpg
Consolidated RevenueRevenue decreased $979$547 million, or 9%5%, in 20162019 compared to 2015 primarily driven by:
The2018. Excluding the unfavorable FX impactsimpact of $326$133 million, primarily in Argentina of $94 million, Kazakhstan of $63 million and Colombia of $54 million.South America, this decrease was driven by:
Excluding the FX impact mentioned above:
$483229 million in Brazil due toSouth America primarily driven by lower rates for energy sold under new contracts at Tietê as well as operationsgeneration and prices in 2015 but notArgentina and lower contract sales and generation in 2016 at Uruguaiana;Chile;
$164 million in the U.S. primarily due to the sale of DPLER in January 2016 as well as lower rates at DPL, partially offset by higher retail rates at IPL;


82 | 2020 Annual Report
$141 million in MCAC primarily due to lower pass-through costs at El Salvador; and


$95173 million in Eurasia primarily due to the sales of the Masinloc power plant in March 2018 and the Northern Ireland businesses in June 2019; and
$172 million in US and Utilities primarily driven by the closure of generation facilities at DPL in the first half of 2018 and Shady Point in May 2019, and lower pass-through costsenergy prices and sales due to higher temperatures and other favorable market conditions present in 2018 as compared to 2019 at IPP4 in Jordan,Southland, partially offset by price increases due to the full operations2018 rate orders at Mong DuongIPL and DPL and an increase in 2016 compared to Unit 1energy pass-through costs in March 2015 with principal operations commencing in April 2015.El Salvador.
These decreasesunfavorable impacts were partially offset by an increase of $165$156 million in Andes mainly due toMCAC driven by the commencement of operations at Cochranethe Colon combined cycle facility in Chile with Unit1 operationalPanama in July 2016 and principal operations September 2018.
Operating Margin
(in October.millions)
aes-20201231_g19.jpg
Consolidated Operating MarginOperating margin decreased $283$224 million, or 11%9%, in 20162019 compared to 2015 primarily driven by:
The2018. Excluding the unfavorable impact of FX impacts of $88$46 million, primarily in Kazakhstan, Argentina, and Colombia.South America, this decrease was driven by:
Excluding the FX impact mentioned above:
$198107 million in Brazil drivenSouth America primarily due to the drivers discussed above;
$46 million in MCAC due to the outage at Changuinola as a result of upgrading the tunnel lining and lower hydrology in Panama as compared to the prior year, partially offset by the revenue drivers above;business interruption insurance recoveries at the Andres facility in Dominican Republic, higher contract sales at Panama, and the commencement of operations at the Colon combined cycle facility in Panama; and
$3931 million in Eurasia primarily due to the U.S. drivendrivers discussed above, partially offset by lower depreciation at the revenue drivers above.Jordan plants due to their classification as held-for-sale.
These decreasesunfavorable impacts were partially offset by ana $21 million increase of $52 million in AndesUS and Utilities mostly driven by the revenue drivers above as well as lower spot prices2018 rate orders at Gener Chile.IPL and DPL, partially offset by the lost margin from the sale and closure of generation facilities at Shady Point and DPL, and increased rock ash disposal at Puerto Rico.
See Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis of this Form 10-K for additional discussion and analysis of operating results for each SBU.
Consolidated Results of Operations — Other
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses include expenses related to corporate staff functions and initiatives, executive management, finance, legal, human resources, and information systems, as well as global development costs.
General and administrative expenses increased $21decreased $31 million, or 11%16%, in 2017 from 2016to $165 million for 2020 compared to $196 million for 2019, primarily due to severancea higher reallocation of information technology costs related to workforce reductions associated with a major restructuring program, increasedthe SBUs and lower professional fees, and increased businesspartially offset by higher development activity.costs.
General and administrative expenses decreased $2increased $4 million, or 1%2%, in 2016 from 2015to $196 million for 2019 compared to $192 million for 2018, with no material drivers.


83 | 2020 Annual Report

Interest expense
Interest expense increased $36decreased $12 million, or 3%1%, in 2017 from 2016to $1,038 million for 2020, compared to $1,050 million for 2019 primarily due to a $30 million increaseincremental capitalized interest in Chile and lower interest rates due to refinancing at Andes SBU, driventhe Parent Company, partially offset by lower capitalized interest in 2017 due to Cochrane plant starting commercialthe commencement of operations at the Alamitos and Huntington Beach facilities in the second half of 2016.February 2020.
Interest expense decreased $11$6 million, or 1% in 2016 from 2015, to $1,050 million for 2019, compared to $1,056 million for 2018 primarily due to a decrease inthe debt balancerefinancing at the Parent Company and US SBU,DPL, and favorable foreign currency translation at AES Brasil, partially offset by higherlower capitalized interest expense due to Mong Duong assets being placedthe commencement of operations at Colon in service,September 2018, a decrease in AFUDC for the Eagle Valley CCGT project at IPL, and the loss of hedge accounting at Alto Maipo in 2018, which ended theresulted in favorable unrealized mark-to-market adjustments recognized within interest capitalization period at the Eurasia SBU.expense.
Interest income
Interest income decreased $1$50 million, or 16%, to $268 million for 2020, compared to $318 million for 2019 primarily to the decrease of the LIBOR rate on receivables in 2017 from 2016 with no material drivers.Argentina, a lower loan receivable balance at Mong Duong, and a lower average interest rate at AES Brasil.
Interest income decreased $11increased $8 million, or 4%3%, to $318 million for 2019, compared to $310 million for 2018 primarily in 2016 from 2015 primarily due to prior year recognition of accumulatedSouth America driven by a higher average interest rate on VAT balances at the Andes SBU and lower short term investment balances at the Brazil SBU in 2016, partially offset by higher interest income recognized on the financing element of the service concession arrangement at Mong Duong in the Eurasia SBU, which became fully operational in April 2015.CAMMESA receivables.
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $68increased $17 million, or 10%, to $186 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, compared to $169 million for 2019. This increase was primarily relateddue to losses of $92 million, $20$145 million and $9$34 million on debt extinguishments at the Parent Company AESand DPL, respectively, resulting from the redemption of senior notes and a $16 million loss resulting from the Panama refinancing in 2020. These increases were partially offset by losses of $45 million at DPL, $31 million at Mong Duong, $29 million at Gener, $28 million at Colon, and IPALCO, respectively. The loss$24 million at Cochrane in 2019 resulting from the redemption or refinancing of senior notes.
Loss on extinguishment of debt decreased $19 million, or 10% to $169 million for 2019, compared to $188 million for 2018. This decrease was primarily due to losses of $171 million at the Parent Company resulting from the redemption of senior notes in 2018 compared to the 2019 losses discussed above.
See Note 11—Debt included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Other income
Other income decreased $70 million, or 48%, to $75 million for 2020, compared to $145 million for 2019 primarily due to the prior year gains on insurance recoveries associated with property damage at the Andres facility and upgrading the tunnel lining at Changuinola, partially offset by the current year gain on sale of Redondo Beach land at Southland.
Other income increased $73 million to $145 million for 2019, compared to $72 million for 2018 primarily due to gains on insurance recoveries associated with property damage at the Andres facility and upgrading the tunnel lining at Changuinola. These increases were partially offset by a gain on early retirementremeasurement of debt at Alicura of $65 million.
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $13 millioncontingent liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2016. This loss was primarily related to losses of $14 million recognized on debt extinguishment at the Parent Company.
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $182 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This loss was primarily related to losses of $105 million, $22 million, and $19 million recognized on debt extinguishments at the Parent Company, IPL, and the Dominican Republic, respectively.


projects in Hawaii in 2018.
Other income and expense
Other income increased $56 million, or 88%, in 2017 from 2016 primarily due to the favorable impact at Brazil SBU as a result of the settlement of legal proceeding at AES Uruguaiana related to YPF's breach of the parties’ gas supply agreement in 2017.
Other income decreased $20 million, or 24%, in 2016 from 2015 primarily due to gains on early contract termination in 2015.
Other expense decreased $22$27 million, or 28%34%, in 2017 from 2016to $53 million for 2020, compared to $80 million for 2019 primarily due to prior year losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at Distributed Energy, the 2016 recognition of a full allowance on a non-trade receivable in the MCAC SBU as a result of payment delays. This decrease was partially offset by the 2017prior year loss on disposal of assets at DPL asChanguinola associated with upgrading the tunnel lining, and lower defined benefit plan costs at IPL in 2020, partially offset by a resultloss on sale of theStabilization Fund receivables in Chile and compliance with an arbitration decision to close the coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units at Stuart and Killen on or before June 1, 2018 and the write-off of water rights in the Andes SBU for projects that are no longer being pursued.2020.
Other expense increased $55$22 million, in 2016 from 2015or 38% to $80 million for 2019, compared to $58 million for 2018 primarily due to losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at Distributed Energy and the 2016 recognitionloss on disposal of assets at Changuinola associated with upgrading the tunnel lining in 2019. This was partially offset by


84 | 2020 Annual Report

the loss on disposal of assets resulting from damage associated with a full allowance on a non-trade receivablelightning incident at the Andres facility in the MCAC SBU as a result of payment delays.Dominican Republic in 2018.
See Note 18—21—Other Income and Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businessesbusiness interests
Loss on disposal and sale of businessesbusiness interests was $52$95 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, primarily due to the $49 million and $33 million loss on sale of Uruguaiana and the loss on the settlement of the arbitration related to the sale of Kazakhstan CHPs and hydroelectric plants, respectively,HPPs, partially offset by the recognitiongain on sale of OPGC; as compared to a gain of $28 million for 2019 primarily due to the gain on sale of a $23 millionportion of our interest in sPower's operating assets, the gain relatedon the merger of Simple Energy to form Uplight, and the expirationgain on transfer of a contingency at Masinloc.Stuart and Killen, partially offset by the loss on sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford.
Gain on disposal and sale of businesses was $29business interests decreased to $28 million for the year ended December 31, 20162019 as compared to $984 million for 2018, primarily due to the $49 million gain2018 gains on sale of DPLER, partially offset by the $20Masinloc of $772 million, loss on the deconsolidationCTNG of U.K. Wind.$126 million, and Electrica Santiago of $70 million.
Gain on disposal and sale of businesses was $29 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to the $22 million gain on sale of Armenia Mountain.
Goodwill impairment expense
There were no goodwill impairments for the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Goodwill impairment expense was $317 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 due to a goodwill impairment at DP&L.
See Note 8—25—GoodwillHeld-For-Sale and Other Intangible AssetsDispositions and Note 8Investments in and Advances to Affiliates included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Asset impairment expense
Asset impairment expense increased $679 million to $864 million for 2020, compared to $185 million for 2019. This increase was primarily driven by a $781 million impairment related to certain coal-fired plants at AES Gener and a $30 million impairment of the Estrella del Mar I power barge in Panama, compared to a $115 million prior year impairment at Kilroot and Ballylumford upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in 2019.
Asset impairment expense decreased $559$23 million, or 51%11%, in 2017 from 2016 mainlyto $185 million for 2019, compared to $208 million for 2018. This decrease was primarily driven by the prior year US SBU impairment of $859$115 million at DPL, partially offset by a $121 million impairment in the current year at Laurel Mountain as a result of a declinean impairment analysis performed at Kilroot and Ballylumford upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in forward pricing.
Asset impairment expense increased $8112019 and $60 million in 2016 from 2015 primarilyat Hawaii due to asset impairments recognized during 2016 at DPLa decrease in the US SBU, resulting from lower forecasted revenues fromeconomic useful life of the PJM capacity auctioncoal-fired asset, compared to 2018 impairments of $157 million at Shady Point due to an unfavorable economic outlook creating uncertainty around future cash flows and higher anticipated environmental compliance costs.$37 million at Nejapa due to the landfill owner's failure to perform improvements necessary to continue extracting gas.
See Note 19—22—Asset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.


Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) in millions were as follows:
Years Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Mexico$17
 $(8) $(6)
Philippines15
 12
 8
Bulgaria14
 (8) 3
Chile8
 (9) (18)
AES Corporation3
 (50) (31)
Argentina1
 37
 124
United Kingdom(3) 13
 11
Colombia(23) (8) 29
Other10
 6
 (14)
Total (1)
$42
 $(15) $106
Years Ended December 31,202020192018
Argentina (1)
$29 $(73)$(71)
Corporate21 (1)11 
Other(12)
Total (2)
$55 $(67)$(72)
_____________________________
(1)
(1)    Primarily associated with the peso-denominated energy receivable indexed to the USD through the FONINVEMEM agreement which is considered a foreign currency derivative. See Note 7—Financing Receivables included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
(2)    Includes gains of $57 million, losses of $31 million, and gains of$23 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Includes gains of $21 million, $17 million and $247 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction gains of $42$55 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, primarily driven by transactions associated with VAT activity in Mexico, the amortization of frozen embedded derivatives in the Philippines,realized and appreciation of the Euro in Bulgaria. Theseunrealized gains were partially offset by unfavorableon foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Colombia.Argentina and unrealized gains at the Parent Company resulting from the appreciation of intercompany receivables denominated in Euro.
The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction losses of $15$67 million for the year ended December 31, 20162019, primarily due to remeasurementdriven by unrealized losses on intercompany notes, and losses on swaps and options at The AES Corporation. This loss was partially offset in Argentina, mainly due to the favorable impact of foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables.
The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction gains of $106 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Argentina and depreciationunrealized losses associated with the devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in the Argentine peso.


85 | 2020 Annual Report

The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction losses of $72 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in Argentine pesos, partially offset by gains at the Parent Company related to foreign currency derivatives.
Other non-operating expense
Other non-operating expense was $202 million and $92 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively, due to the other-than-temporary impairment of the Colombian peso in Colombia. These gains were partially offsetOPGC equity method investment. In December 2019, an other-than-temporary impairment of $92 million was identified at OPGC primarily due to decreasesthe estimated market value of the Company's investment and other negative developments impacting future expected cash flows at the investee. In March 2020, the Company recognized an additional $43 million other-than-temporary impairment due to the economic slowdown. In June 2020, the Company agreed to sell its entire stake in the valuationOPGC investment, resulting in an other-than-temporary impairment of intercompany notes at The AES Corporation and unfavorable devaluation$158 million.
Other non-operating expense was $147 million in 2018 primarily due to the $144 million other-than-temporary impairment of the Chilean pesoGuacolda equity method investment as a result of increased renewable generation in Chile.Chile lowering energy prices and impacting the ability of Guacolda to re-contract its existing PPAs after they expire.
See Note 8—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense increased $958decreased $136 million to $990$216 million in 20172020 as compared to 2016.$352 million for 2019. The Company's effective tax rates were 128%44% and 17%35% for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.2019.
The net increase in the 20172020 effective tax rate was due primarily to expense relateddue to the U.S. tax reform one-time transition tax2020 impacts of the other-than-temporary impairment of the OPGC equity method investment and remeasurementthe loss on sale of deferred tax assets.the Company’s entire interest in AES Uruguaiana, partially offset by the recognition of a federal ITC for the Na Pua Makani wind facility in Hawaii. Further, the 20162019 rate was impacted by the items described below. See Note 25—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for details of the sales.
Income tax expense decreased $380$356 million to $32$352 million in 20162019 as compared to 2015.$708 million for 2018. The Company's effective tax rates were 17% and 42%rate was 35% for theboth years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.2018.
The net decrease in the 20162019 effective tax rate was due, in part, toimpacted by the 2016 asset impairmentsnondeductible losses on the sale of the Company's entire 100% interest in the U.S.,Kilroot coal and oil-fired plant and energy storage facility and the Ballylumford gas-fired plant in the United Kingdom and associated asset impairments. Further impacting the 2019 effective tax rate were the effects of the Argentine peso devaluation to tax expense, as well as to pretax income for nondeductible unrealized losses on foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Argentina. The 2018 effective tax rate was impacted by the devaluationincrease in the Staff Accounting Bulletin No.118 ("SAB 118") adjustment with respect to the estimate of the peso in certain of our Mexican subsidiariesone-time transition tax and deferred tax remeasurement under the release of valuation allowance at certain of our Brazilian subsidiaries. These favorable items wereTCJA. This impact was partially offset by the unfavorable impact of Chilean income tax law reform enacted during the first quartersale of 2016. Further, the 2015 rate was due,Company’s entire 51% equity interest in part, to the nondeductible 2015 impairment of goodwill at DP&L and Chilean withholding taxes offset by the release of valuation allowance at certain of our businesses in Brazil, Vietnam and the U.S.Masinloc. See Note 19—25—Asset Impairment ExpenseHeld-for-Sale and Dispositions included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional information regardingdetails of the 2016 U.S. asset impairments. See Note 20—Income Taxes included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the 2016 Chilean income tax law reform.sales.
Our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the U.S., which are generally taxed at rates different than the U.S. statutory rate. Foreign earnings may be taxed at rates higher than the new U.S. corporate rate of 21% and a greater portion of our foreign earnings may beare also subject to current U.S. taxation under the new tax rules.GILTI rules introduced by the TCJA. A future proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate. The Company also benefits from reduced tax rates in certain countries as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment. See Note 20—23—IncomeTaxes included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additionaladdition information regarding these reduced rates.


Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates
Net equity in earningslosses of affiliates increased $35decreased $49 million, or 97%28%, to $123 million in 2017 from 20162020, compared to $172 million in 2019. This was primarily driven by a $31 million increase in earnings due to earnings at the sPower equity method investment purchased in 2017, partially offset by fixedlower long-lived asset impairments in 2017 at the Distributed Energy entities, accounted forGuacolda, Gener's 50%-owned equity affiliate, during 2020 as equity affiliates. The $42 million equity earnings recorded for the investment in sPower includes the allocation of $53 million of project incomecompared to AES through the application of the HLBV model. This income includes the impact of day one gain described in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allocation of Earnings included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K. The net project income at sPower in the period after the acquisition was $20 million.2019.
Net equity in earnings of affiliates decreased $69$211 million or 66%,to losses of $172 million in 2016 from 2015 as2019, compared to earnings of $39 million in 2018. This was primarily driven by a result$158 million decrease in earnings due to a long-lived


86 | 2020 Annual Report

asset impairment at Guacolda, a $19 million decrease in earnings at OPGC due to a contract termination charge, and a $20 million decrease in earnings at sPower due to the impairment of the restructuring of Guacolda in September 2015, which resulted in a $66 million benefit. No comparable transaction occurred in 2016.certain development projects.
See Note 7—8—Investments In and Advances to Affiliates included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
Net lossincome from discontinued operations was $629$3 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, with no material drivers.
Net income from discontinued operations was $216 million for the year ended December 31, 20172018 primarily due to the after-tax lossgain on deconsolidationsale of Eletropaulo of $611 million recognized in the fourth quarter of 2017. The remaining loss was due to a loss contingency recognized by our equity affiliate, partially offset by the income from operations of Eletropaulo prior to the date of deconsolidation.
Net loss from discontinued operations was $968 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the sale of Sul, partially offset by the income from operations of Eletropaulo. The loss includes an after-tax loss on the impairment of Sul of $382$199 million recognized in the second quarter of 20162018 and an additional after-tax loss on the salerecognition of Sula $26 million deferred gain upon liquidation of $737 million recognized upon disposalBorsod in October 2016. There was no significant loss from operations related to the Sul discontinued business.2018.
Net income from discontinued operations was $80 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to the income from operations of Eletropaulo. There was no significant loss from operations related to the Sul discontinued business.
See Note 21—24—Discontinued Operations included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries increased $148decreased $69 million, or 70%39%, to $106 million in 2017 from 20162020, compared to $175 million in 2019. This decrease was primarily due to:
Asset impairmentLower earnings in Chile due to long-lived asset impairments at Buffalo Gap IGener, partially offset by net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos and IIlower interest expense due to incremental capitalized interest;
Lower earnings in 2016.Colombia due to drier hydrology and a life extension project at the Chivor hydroelectric plant;
Prior year insurance recoveries net of outages at Andres; and
HLBV allocation of losses to noncontrolling interests at Distributed Energy.
These increases were partially offset by:
Higher earnings in Brazil due to the favorable revision of the GSF liability; and
Prior year losses on extinguishment of debt at Mong Duong and Colon.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries decreased $153$187 million, or 42%52%, to $175 million in 2016 from 20152019, compared to $362 million in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to:
Gains on sales of Electrica Santiago and CTNG in Chile in 2018;
Lower earnings in Chile in 2019 primarily due to long-lived asset impairment at Tietê,Guacolda, losses on extinguishment of debt, and lower contracted energy sales and prices;
Asset impairmentsHLBV allocation of losses to noncontrolling interests at Buffalo Gap IDistributed Energy as a result of renewable projects reaching COD in 2019; and II.
Lower earnings in Panama in 2019 primarily due to lower hydrology and the outage at Changuinola as a result of upgrading the tunnel lining.
These decreases were partially offset by:
Lower assetOther-than-temporary impairment at Buffalo Gap IIIof Guacolda in 2015.2018.
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation
Net loss attributable to The AES Corporation increased $31 million, or 3%, in 2017 compared to 2016 as a result of:
Impact due to U.S. Tax Reform Law enacted on December 22, 2017;
Current year losses on sale of Kazakhstan CHPs and hydroelectric plants;
Current year loss on deconsolidation of Eletropaulo;
Current year impairments at Laurel Mountain, Kazakhstan CHPs and hydroelectric plants and Kilroot; and
Higher loss on extinguishment of debt.
These increases were partially offset by:


Prior year impairments at DPL;
Prior year loss from discontinued operations as a result of the sale of Sul;
Higher margin at our MCAC SBU;
The favorable impact of the YPF legal settlement at AES Uruguaiana; and
Higher gains on foreign currency transactions.
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation decreased $1.4 billion,$257 million, or 85%, to a loss of $1.1 billion$46 million in 20162020, compared to income of $306$303 million in 2015 as result of:2019. This decrease was primarily due to:
ImpairmentsLong-lived asset impairments at Gener and lossPanama;
Net impact of current and prior year other-than-temporary impairments of OPGC;
Higher losses on saleextinguishment of debt in the current year, primarily due to major refinancings at discontinued businesses;the Parent Company;
Higher impairment expense on long lived assets;
Lower operating margins at our US Brazil and Eurasia SBUs;Utilities SBU;
Lower equity in earnings


87 | 2020 Annual Report

Losses on sale of affiliates due toUruguaiana and the 2015 restructuringKazakhstan HPPs as a result of the final arbitration decision; and
Prior year net insurance recoveries at Guacolda; and
Lower gains on foreign currency derivatives.Andres.
These decreases were partially offset by:
Prior year long-lived asset impairments at Kilroot and Ballylumford;
Net impact of current and prior year long-lived asset impairments at Guacolda;
Prior year unrealized losses on foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Argentina;
Higher margins at our South America and MCAC SBUs;
Lower effectiveincome tax rate;expense;
Lower interest expense due to incremental capitalized interest in Chile; and
Gain on sale of land held by AES Redondo Beach at Southland.
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation decreased $900 million, or 75% to $303 million in 2019, compared to $1,203 million in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to:
Gains on the sales of Masinloc, Eletropaulo (reflected within discontinued operations), CTNG and Electrica Santiago in 2018, net of tax;
Long-lived asset impairments at Guacolda, Hawaii, Kilroot and Ballylumford, and other-than-temporary impairment at OPGC in 2019;
Loss on sale at Kilroot and Ballylumford in 2019;
Losses on extinguishment of debt at DPL, AES Gener, Mong Duong, and Colon in 2019;
Losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at Distributed Energy in 2019;
The impact of sold businesses in our Eurasia SBU;
Lower margins at Argentina and Chile in 2019, primarily due to lower generation; and
Lower margins at Changuinola in 2019, driven by the outage as a result of upgrading the tunnel lining and lower hydrology in Panama.
These decreases were partially offset by:
Income tax expense in 2018 to finalize the initial impact of U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017;
Loss on extinguishment expense;of debt at the Parent Company in 2018;
Long-lived asset impairments at Shady Point and Nejapa, and other-than-temporary impairment at Guacolda in 2018;
AbsenceGains on insurance proceeds in 2019, associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018 and the Changuinola tunnel leak;
Gain on sale of goodwill impairment expense.a portion of our interest in sPower’s operating assets and gain on disposal of Stuart and Killen at DPL in 2019; and
Higher earnings at our US and Utilities SBU in 2019, primarily as a result of renewable projects that came online.
SBU Performance Analysis
Segments
We are organized into five4 market-oriented SBUs: US and Utilities (United States), AndesStates, Puerto Rico and El Salvador); South America (Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Argentina), Brazil, Brazil); MCAC (Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean),; and Eurasia (Europe and Asia). In February 2018, we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio, optimize our cost structure, and reduce our carbon intensity. The evaluation of the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure is still ongoing.
Non-GAAP Measures
Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC and Adjusted EPS and Free Cash Flow are non-GAAP supplemental measures that are used by management and external users of our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements such as investors, industry analysts and lenders.


88 | 2020 Annual Report

For the year endingended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company changed the definitiondefinitions of Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC and Adjusted EPS to exclude (a) associated benefits and costs due to acquisitions, dispositions, and early plant closures; includingnet gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the tax impact of decisions made at the time of sale to repatriate sales proceeds; (b) costs directlySouth America SBU, associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations,the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and office consolidation; and (c) tax benefit or expense related to the enactment effects of 2017 U.S. tax law reform.
Minera Spence. We have excluded from our adjusted financial results costs associated with non-recurring restructuring initiatives to simplify the organization and improve efficiency. These restructuring initiatives would result in significant incremental costs above normal operations andbelieve the inclusion of such coststhe effects of this non-recurring transaction would result in a lack of comparability in our results of operations and could be misleadingwould distort the metrics that our investors use to investors.measure us.
TheFor the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company amended itschanged the definitions of Adjusted PTC and Adjusted EPS definition to exclude gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases. We believe these transactions are economically similar to sales of business interests and excluding these gains or losses better reflects the specific enactment effectsunderlying business performance of the transformational U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017. Such effects include a one-time transition tax on foreign earnings and the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate. As permitted by the SEC in SAB 118, the Company recorded provisional amounts for these effects in its 2017 income from continuing operations. Changes in our estimates of these enactment effects may occur in future periods.
We believe excluding these benefits and costs better reflect the business performance by removing the variability caused by strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests or close plants early, as well as the costs directly associated with a major restructuring program and the impact of the 2017 U.S. tax law reform, which affect results in a given period or periods. The Company has also reflected these changes in the comparative periods ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.


Company.
Adjusted Operating Margin
We define Adjusted Operating Margin as Operating Margin, adjusted for the impact of NCI, excluding (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions; (b) gains, losses and associated benefits and costs due toassociated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures; and (c) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations, and office consolidation.consolidation; and (d) net gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence. The allocation of HLBV earnings to noncontrolling interests is not adjusted out of Adjusted Operating Margin. See Review of Consolidated Results of Operations for definitions of Operating Margin and cost of sales.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Adjusted Operating Margin is Operating Margin.Margin. We believe that Adjusted Operating Margin better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company. Factors in this determination include the impact of NCI, where AES consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly owned by the Company, as well as the variability due to unrealized derivatives gains or losses related to derivative transactions and strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests. Adjusted Operating Margin should not be construed as an alternative to Operating Margin, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.
Reconciliation of Adjusted Operating Margin (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Operating Margin$2,693 $2,349 $2,573 
Noncontrolling interests adjustment (1)
(831)(670)(686)
Unrealized derivative losses24 11 19 
Disposition/acquisition losses24 15 21 
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(182)— — 
Restructuring costs (2)
— — 
Total Adjusted Operating Margin$1,728 $1,705 $1,928 
_____________________________
(1)The allocation of HLBV earnings to noncontrolling interests is not adjusted out of Adjusted Operating Margin.
(2)In February 2018, the Company announced a reorganization as a part of its ongoing strategy to simplify its portfolio, optimize its cost structure and reduce its carbon intensity.
aes-20201231_g20.jpg


Reconciliation of Adjusted Operating Margin (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating Margin$2,464
 $2,380
 $2,663
Noncontrolling interests adjustment(690) (644) (705)
Unrealized derivative losses (gains)(5) 9
 19
Disposition/acquisition losses22
 
 
Restructuring costs22
 
 
Total Adjusted Operating Margin$1,813
 $1,745
 $1,977
89 | 2020 Annual Report

Adjusted PTC
We define Adjusted PTC as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions;transactions and equity securities; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, losses, and associated benefits and costs due toassociated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures;closures, and gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; and (f) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations, and office consolidation.consolidation; and (g) net gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence. Adjusted PTC also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities.
Adjusted PTC reflects the impact of NCI and excludes the items specified in the definition above. In addition to the revenue and cost of sales reflected in Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC includes the other components of our income statement,Consolidated Statement of Operations, such as general and administrative expenses in the corporateCorporate segment, as well as business development costs, interest expense and interest income,other expense and other income,realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses, and net equity in earnings of affiliates.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Adjusted PTC is income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation. We believe that Adjusted PTC better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company and is the most relevant measure considered in the Company's internal evaluation of the financial performance.performance of its segments. Factors in this determination include the variability due to unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions or equity securities remeasurement, unrealized


foreign currency gains or losses, losses due to impairments, and strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests, retire debt or implement restructuring initiatives, and the non-recurring nature of the impact of the early contract terminations at Angamos, which affect results in a given period or periods. In addition, earnings before taxAdjusted PTC represents the business performance of the Company before the application of statutory income tax rates and tax adjustments, including the effects of tax planning, corresponding to the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Given its large number of businesses and complexity, the Company concluded that Adjusted PTC is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the Company's results.
Adjusted PTC should not be construed as an alternative to income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.
Reconciliation of Adjusted PTC (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to The AES Corporation$43 $302 $985 
Income tax expense attributable to The AES Corporation130 250 563 
Pre-tax contribution173 552 1,548 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses113 33 
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)(10)36 51 
Disposition/acquisition losses (gains)112 12 (934)
Impairment losses928 406 307 
Loss on extinguishment of debt223 121 180 
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(182)— — 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,247 $1,240 $1,185 


Reconciliation of Adjusted PTC (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to The AES Corporation$(507) $(20) $318
Income tax (benefit) expense attributable to The AES Corporation828
 (111) 263
Pre-tax contribution321
 (131) 581
Unrealized derivative gains(3) (9) (166)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(59) 22
 95
Disposition/acquisition (gains) losses123
 6
 (42)
Impairment losses542
 933
 504
Loss on extinguishment of debt62
 29
 179
Restructuring costs (1)
31
 
 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,017
 $850
 $1,151
_____________________________
(1)
In February 2018, the Company announced a reorganization as a part of its on-going strategy to simplify its portfolio, optimize its cost structure and reduce its carbon intensity.90 | 2020 Annual Report

aes-20201231_g21.jpg
Adjusted EPS
We define Adjusted EPS as diluted earnings per share from continuing operations excluding gains or losses of both consolidated entities and entities accounted for under the equity method due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions;transactions and equity securities; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, or losses, and associated benefits and costs due toassociated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures, and the tax impact from the repatriation of sales proceeds;proceeds, and gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; (f) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations and office consolidation; (g) net gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and (g)Minera Spence; and (h) tax benefit or expense related to the enactment effects of 2017 U.S. tax law reform.reform and related regulations and any subsequent period adjustments related to enactment effects.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Adjusted EPS is diluted earnings per share from continuing operations. We believe that Adjusted EPS better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company and is considered in the Company's internal evaluation of financial performance. Factors in this determination include the variability due to unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions or equity securities remeasurement, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, losses due to impairments, and strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests, retire debt or implement restructuring initiatives, the one-time impact of the 2017 U.S. tax law reform and subsequent period adjustments related to enactment effects, and the non-recurring nature of the impact of the early contract terminations at Angamos, which affect results in a given period or periods. Adjusted EPS should not be construed as an alternative to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.



91 | 2020 Annual Report


The Company reported a loss from continuing operations
Reconciliation of Adjusted EPSYears Ended December 31,
202020192018
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations$0.06 $0.45 $1.48 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses0.01 0.17 (1)0.05 
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)(0.01)0.05 (2)0.09 (3)
Disposition/acquisition losses (gains)0.17 (4)0.02 (5)(1.41)(6)
Impairment losses1.39 (7)0.61 (8)0.46 (9)
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.33 (10)0.18 (11)0.27 (12)
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(0.27)(13)— — 
U.S. Tax Law Reform Impact0.02 (14)(0.01)0.18 (15)
Less: Net income tax expense (benefit)(0.26)(16)(0.11)(17)0.12 (18)
Adjusted EPS$1.44 $1.36 $1.24 
_____________________________
(1)Amount primarily relates to unrealized derivative losses in Argentina of $0.77 and$89 million, or $0.13 per share, mainly associated with foreign currency derivatives on government receivables.
(2)Amount primarily relates to unrealized FX losses in Argentina of $25 million, or $0.04 per share, formainly associated with the years ended December 31, 2017devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in Argentine pesos, and 2016. For purposesunrealized FX losses at the Parent Company of measuring diluted loss$12 million, or $0.02 per share, under GAAP, common stock equivalents were excluded from weighted average shares as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. However, for purposesmainly associated with intercompany receivables denominated in Euro.
(3)Amount primarily relates to unrealized FX losses of computing Adjusted EPS, the Company has included the impact of dilutive common stock equivalents. The table below reconciles the weighted average shares used in GAAP diluted loss$22 million, or $0.03 per share, associated with the devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in Argentine pesos, and unrealized FX losses of $14 million, or $0.02 per share, on intercompany receivables denominated in Euro and British pounds at the Parent Company.
(4)Amount primarily relates to loss on sale of Uruguaiana of $85 million, or $0.13 per share, loss on sale of the Kazakhstan HPPs of $30 million, or $0.05 per share, as a result of the final arbitration decision, and advisor fees associated with the successful acquisition of additional ownership interest in AES Brasil of $9 million, or $0.01 per share; partially offset by gain on sale of OPGC of $23 million, or $0.03 per share.
(5)Amount primarily relates to losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at Distributed Energy of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, and loss on sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford of $31 million, or $0.05 per share; partially offset by gain on sale of a portion of our interest in sPower’s operating assets of $28 million, or $0.04 per share, gain on disposal of Stuart and Killen at DPL of $20 million, or $0.03 per share, and gain on sale of ownership interest in Simple Energy as part of the Uplight merger of $12 million, or $0.02 per share.
(6)Amount primarily relates to gain on sale of Masinloc of $772 million, or $1.16 per share, gain on sale of CTNG of $86 million, or $0.13 per share, gain on sale of Electrica Santiago of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration at AES Oahu of $32 million, or $0.05 per share, gain on sale related to the weighted average shares used in calculatingCompany's contribution of AES Advancion energy storage to the non-GAAP measureFluence joint venture of Adjusted EPS.$23 million, or $0.03 per share, and realized derivative gains associated with the sale of Eletropaulo of $21 million, or $0.03 per share; partially offset by loss on disposal of the Beckjord facility and additional shutdown costs related to Stuart and Killen at DPL of $21 million, or $0.03 per share.
(7)Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at Gener of $527 million, or $0.79 per share, other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $201 million, or $0.30 per share, impairments at our Guacolda and sPower equity affiliates, impacting equity earnings by $85 million, or $0.13 per share, and $57 million, or $0.09 per share, respectively; impairment at Hawaii of $38 million, or $0.06 per share, and impairment at Panama of $15 million, or $0.02 per share.
(8)Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at Kilroot and Ballylumford of $115 million, or $0.17 per share, and Hawaii of $60 million, or $0.09 per share; impairments at our Guacolda and sPower equity affiliates, impacting equity earnings by $105 million, or $0.16 per share, and $21 million, or $0.03 per share, respectively; and other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $92 million, or $0.14 per share.
(9)Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at Shady Point of $157 million, or $0.24 per share, and Nejapa of $37 million, or $0.06 per share, and other-than-temporary impairment of Guacolda of $96 million, or $0.14 per share.
(10)Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $146 million, or $0.22 per share, DPL of $32 million, or $0.05 per share, Angamos of $17 million, or $0.02 per share, and Panama of $11 million, or $0.02 per share.
(11)Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at DPL of $45 million, or $0.07 per share, AES Gener of $35 million, or $0.05 per share, Mong Duong of $17 million, or $0.03 per share, and Colon of $14 million, or $0.02 per share.
(12)Amount primarily relates to loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $171 million, or $0.26 per share.
(13)Amount relates to net gains at Angamos associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence of $182 million, or $0.27 per share.
(14)Amount represents adjustment to tax law reform remeasurement due to incremental deferred taxes related to DPL of $16 million, or $0.02 per share.
(15)Amount relates to a SAB 118 charge to finalize the provisional estimate of one-time transition tax on foreign earnings of $194 million, or $0.29 per share, partially offset by a SAB 118 income tax benefit to finalize the provisional estimate of remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate of $77 million, or $0.11 per share.
(16)Amount primarily relates to income tax benefits associated with the impairments at Gener and Guacolda of $164 million, or $0.25 per share, and income tax benefits associated with losses on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $31 million, or $0.05 per share; partially offset by income tax expense related to net gains at Angamos associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence of $49 million, or $0.07 per share.
(17)Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefits associated with the impairments at OPGC of $23 million, or $0.03 per share, Guacolda of $13 million, or $0.02 per share, Hawaii of $13 million, or $0.02 per share, and Kilroot and Ballylumford of $11 million, or $0.02 per share, and income tax benefits associated with losses on early retirement of debt of $24 million, or $0.04 per share; partially offset by an adjustment to income tax expense related to 2018 gains on sales of business interests, primarily Masinloc, of $25 million, or $0.04 per share.
(18)Amount primarily relates to the income tax expense under the GILTI provision associated with the gains on sales of business interests, primarily Masinloc, of $97 million, or $0.15 per share, and income tax expense associated with gains on sale of CTNG of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, and Electrica Santiago of $13 million, or $0.02 per share; partially offset by income tax benefits associated with the loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, and income tax benefits associated with the impairment at Shady Point of $33 million, or $0.05 per share.

Reconciliation of Denominator Used For Adjusted Earnings Per Share Years Ended December 31, 2017 Years Ended December 31, 2016
(in millions, except per share data) Loss Shares $ per share Loss Shares $ per share
GAAP DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE            
Loss from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders $(507) 660
 $(0.77) $(25) 660
 $(0.04)
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES            
Restricted stock units 
 2
 0.01
 
 2
 
NON-GAAP DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE $(507) 662
 $(0.76) $(25) 662
 $(0.04)

Reconciliation of Adjusted EPSYears Ended December 31, 
 2017 2016 2015 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations$(0.76) $(0.04) $0.46
 
Unrealized derivative gains
 (0.01) (0.24) 
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(0.10) 0.03
 0.15
 
Disposition/acquisition (gains) losses0.19
(1) 
0.01
(2) 
(0.06)
(3) 
Impairment losses0.82
(4) 
1.41
(5) 
0.73
(6) 
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.09
(7) 
0.05
(8) 
0.26
(9) 
Restructuring costs0.05
 
 
 
U.S. Tax Law Reform Impact1.08
(10) 

 
 
Less: Net income tax benefit on adjustments(0.29)
(11) 
(0.51)
(12) 
(0.06)
(13) 
Adjusted EPS$1.08
 $0.94
 $1.24
 
_____________________________
(1)
Amount primarily relates to loss on sale of Kazakhstan CHPs of $49 million, or $0.07 per share, realized derivative losses associated with the sale of Sul of $38 million, or $0.06 per share, loss on sale of Kazakhstan Hydroelectric plants of $33 million, or $0.05 per share, costs associated with early plant closure of DPL of $24 million, or $0.04 per share; partially offset by gain on Masinloc contingent consideration of $23 million or $0.03 per share and gain on sale of Zimmer and Miami Fort of $13 million, or $0.02 per share.92 | 2020 Annual Report
(2)
Amount primarily relates to the loss on deconsolidation of UK Wind of $20 million, or $0.03 per share, and losses associated with the sale of Sul of $10 million, or $0.02; partially offset by the gain on sale of DPLER of $22 million, or $0.03 per share.
(3)
Amount primarily relates to the gains on the sale of Armenia Mountain of $22 million, or $0.03 per share and from the sale of Solar Spain and Solar Italy of $7 million, or $0.01 per share.
(4)
Amount primarily relates to asset impairment at Kazakhstan CHPs of $94 million, or $0.14 per share, at Kazakhstan hydroelectric plants of $92 million, or $0.14 per share, at Laurel Mountain wind farm of $121 million, or $0.18 per share, at DPL of $175 million, or $0.27 per share and at Kilroot of $37 million, or $0.05 per share.
(5)
Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at DPL of $859 million, or $1.30 per share; $159 million at Buffalo Gap II ($49 million, or $0.07 per share, net of NCI); and $77 million at Buffalo Gap I ($23 million, or $0.03 per share, net of NCI).
(6)
Amount primarily relates to the goodwill impairment at DPL of $317 million, or $0.46 per share, and asset impairments at Kilroot of $121 million ($119 million, or $0.17 per share, net of NCI), at Buffalo Gap III of $116 million ($27 million, or $0.04 per share, net of NCI), and at U.K. Wind (Development Projects) of $38 million ($30 million, or $0.04 per share, net of NCI).
(7)
Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $92 million, or $0.14 per share, at AES Gener of $20 million, or $0.02 per share, at IPALCO of $9 million or $0.01 per share; partially offset by a gain on early retirement of debt at Alicura of $65 million, or $0.10 per share.
(8)
Amount primarily relates to the loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $19 million, or $0.03 per share.
(9)
Amount primarily relates to the loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $116 million, or $0.17 per share and at IPL of $22 million ($17 million, or $0.02 per share, net of NCI).
(10)
Amount relates to a one-time transition tax on foreign earnings of $675 million, or $1.02 per share and the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate of $39 million, or $0.06 per share.
(11)
Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefit associated with asset impairment losses of $148 million, or $0.22 per share in the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.
(12)
Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefit associated with asset impairment of $332 million, or $0.50 per share in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.
(13)
Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefit associated with losses on extinguishment of debt of $55 million, or $0.08 per share in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.


Free Cash Flow
We define Free Cash Flow as net cash from operating activities (adjusted for service concession asset capital expenditures) less maintenance capital expenditures (including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures), net of reinsurance proceeds from third parties. Upon the Company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective January 1, 2015, capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are now classified as operating activities. See Note 1General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information on the adoption of this guidance.
We also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory, contractual or other mechanisms. An example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is IPL's investment in MATS-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker. See Item 1.Business—US SBU—IPL—Environmental Matters for details of these investments.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Free Cash Flow is net cash provided by operating activities. We believe that Free Cash Flow is a useful measure for evaluating our financial condition because it represents the amount of cash generated by the business after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures that may be available for investing in growth opportunities or for repaying debt.
The presentation of Free Cash Flow has material limitations. Free Cash Flow should not be construed as an alternative to net cash from operating activities, which is determined in accordance with GAAP. Free Cash Flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed, such as debt service requirements and dividend payments. Our definition of Free Cash Flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies.

Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net Cash provided by operating activities$2,489
 $2,884
 $2,134
Add: capital expenditures related to service concession assets (1)
6
 29
 165
Less: maintenance capital expenditures, net of reinsurance proceeds(551) (624) (611)
Less: non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures (2)
(23) (45) (60)
Free Cash Flow$1,921
 $2,244
 $1,628
_____________________________
(1)
Service concession asset expenditures are included in net cash provided by operating activities, but are excluded from the Free Cash Flow non-GAAP metric.
(2)
Excludes IPL's recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $54 million, $186 million and $262 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


US and Utilities SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC and Free Cash Flow (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016 $ Change 2016 vs. 2015 % Change 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Margin $567
 $582
 $621
 $(15) -3 % $(39) -6 %
Adjusted Operating Margin 509
 513
 598
 (4) -1 % (85) -14 %
Adjusted PTC 361
 347
 360
 14
 4 % (13) -4 %
Operating Cash Flow 776
 912
 845
 (136) -15 % 67
 8 %
Free Cash Flow 597
 671
 616
 (74) -11 % 55
 9 %
Free Cash Flow Attributable to NCI 41
 57
 25
 (16) -28 % 32
 NM
For the Years Ended December 31,202020192018$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019$ Change 2019 vs. 2018% Change 2019 vs. 2018
Operating Margin$638 $754 $733 $(116)-15 %$21 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
577 659 678 (82)-12 %(19)-3 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
505 569 511 (64)-11 %58 11 %
_____________________________
(1)
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
See Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses. In addition, AES owns 70% of IPL as of March 2016 compared to 75% beginning April 2015, 85% beginning in February 2015 and 100% prior to February 2015.
Fiscal year 20172020 versus 20162019
Operating Margin decreased $15$116 million, or 3%15%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
IPL 
Decrease due to implementation of new base rates in Q2 2016 which resulted in a favorable change in accrual$(18)
Total IPL Decrease(18)
DPL 
Lower retail margin due to lower regulated rates(22)
Lower volumes primarily due to the shutdown of Stuart Unit 1 and lower commercial availability

(21)
Lower depreciation expense driven by lower PP&E carrying values from impairments in 2016 and 201726
Other7
Total DPL Decrease(10)
Other Business Drivers13
Total US SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(15)
Decrease at DPL due to lower regulated retail margin primarily due to changes to DP&L’s ESP and lower volumes mainly from milder weather$(63)
Decrease due to the sale and closure of generation facilities at DPL, including a credit to depreciation expense in 2019 as a result of a reduction to an ARO liability and cost recoveries from DPL's joint owners of Stuart and Killen in the prior year(50)
Decrease at Southland driven by higher losses from commodity derivatives and lower capacity sales due to unit retirements, partially offset by lower depreciation expense(47)
Decrease at IPL primarily due to lower retail margin driven by lower volumes from milder weather and lower demand from the impact of COVID-19, partially offset by lower maintenance expense from scheduled plant outages(36)
Decrease at Hawaii primarily driven by lower availability due to increasing forced outages and higher expenses related to the shortened useful life of the coal plant(20)
Increase at Southland Energy due to the CCGT units beginning commercial operations during Q1 2020113 
Other(13)
Total US and Utilities SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(116)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $4$82 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives, one-time restructuring charges and costs associated with early plant closures.
Adjusted PTC increased $14 million driven by earnings from equity affiliates due to the 2017 acquisition of sPower, the Company's share of earnings at Distributed Energy due to new project growth, and an increase in insurance recoveries at DPL. The increase in Adjusted PTC was partially offset by the decrease of $4 million in Adjusted Operating Margin described above and a 2016 gain on contract termination at DP&L.
Free Cash Flow decreased $74 million, of which $16 million was attributable to NCI. The decrease was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
A decrease of $49 million in Operating Margin (net of $34 million of decreased depreciation);
Increases in working capital of $144 million primarily related to an increase of $66 million in inventory balances as mild weather in 2015 drove inventory optimization efforts in 2016 and higher payments for purchased power and general accounts payable of $57 million at DPL and IPL; and
Decreases in working capital of $86 million primarily driven by higher collections at IPL of $27 million due to the monetization of higher receivable balances from December 2016 generated by favorable weather and rates and additional regulatory asset payments of $31 million primarily driven by higher MISO cost collection.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by a net increase of $33 million in other drivers, primarily related to a $51 million reduction in maintenance and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures due to declining investment in our remaining coal generation capacity and $12 million in insurance proceeds at DPL.


Fiscal year 2016 versus 2015
Operating Margin decreased by $39 million, or 6%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
US Generation 
Southland related to an increase in depreciation expense as a result of a change in estimated useful lives of the plants$(17)
Impact from sale of Armenia Mountain in July 2015(10)
Warrior Run due to lower availability and higher maintenance cost primarily due to major outages in 2016(8)
Laurel Mountain due to lower regulation dispatch as well as lower energy and regulation pricing(8)
Other(4)
Total US Generation Decrease(47)
DPL
Impact of lower wholesale prices and completion of DP&L’s transition to a competitive-bid market(42)
Decrease in RTO capacity and other revenues primarily due to lower capacity cleared in the auction(21)
Lower depreciation expense due to June 2016 fixed asset impairment and decrease in generating facility maintenance and other expenses17
Other2
Total DPL Decrease(44)
IPL 
Higher retail margin driven by environmental revenues and higher rates due to a new rate order36
Change in accrual resulting from the implementation of new rates18
Other(2)
Total IPL Increase52
Total US SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(39)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $85 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.
Adjusted PTC decreased $13 million driven by the decrease of $85 million in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, partially offset by a gain on contract termination at DP&L, lower interest expense at DPL and IPL in part due to the sell-down impacts and the impact of HLBV at our Distributed Energy business as a result of new projects achieving COD in 2016.
Free Cash Flow increased $55 million, of which $32 million was attributable to NCI. The increase was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
A decrease of $21 million in Operating Margin (net of $28 million in increased depreciation and $10 million in other non-cash impacts);
Decrease in working capital of $169 million primarily driven by a$142 million reduction in inventory holdings as we focused on inventory optimization efforts and reductions in working capital needs of $17 million resulting from the sale of MC2 and DPLER; and
Increases in working capital of $97 million primarily related to an increase in receivables of $80 million resulting from higher rates at IPL and favorable weather in Q4 2016.
Free Cash was also impacted by a $12 million increase in maintenance capital expenditures due to higher expenditures at IPL. Free Cash Flow was also impacted by lower interest payments of $16 million due to debt repayments at DPL and lower interest rates.     
ANDES SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC, and Free Cash Flow (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016 $ Change 2016 vs. 2015 % Change 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Margin $658
 $634
 $618
 $24
 4 % $16
 3 %
Adjusted Operating Margin 450
 442
 466
 8
 2 % (24) -5 %
Adjusted PTC 386
 390
 482
 (4) -1 % (92) -19 %
Operating Cash Flow 714
 475
 462
 239
 50 % 13
 3 %
Free Cash Flow 620
 383
 343
 237
 62 % 40
 12 %
Free Cash Flow Attributable to NCI 204
 119
 119
 85
 71 % 
  %
_____________________________
(1)
See Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses. In addition, AES owned 71% of Gener and Chivor prior to sell down effective December 2015 which resulted in ownership of 67%. The Alto Maipo (under construction) and Cochrane plants are owned 62% and 40% respectively.


Fiscal year 2017 versus 2016
Including the favorable impact of foreign currency translation and remeasurement of $19 million, Operating Margin increased $24 million, or 4%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Gener 
Negative impact of new regulation on Emissions (Green Taxes)$(41)
Lower availability of efficient generation resulting in higher replacement energy and fixed costs mainly associated with major maintenance at Ventanas Complex(29)
Lower margin at the SING market primarily associated with lower contract sales and increase in coal prices at Norgener partially offset by higher spot sales(21)
Start of operations at Cochrane Units I and II in July and October 2016, respectively72
Other1
Total Gener Decrease(18)
Argentina 
Higher capacity payments primarily associated to changes in regulation in 201764
Lower generation at CTSN mainly associated with lower demand(26)
Higher fixed costs mainly associated with higher people costs driven by inflation(11)
Favorable FX impact9
Total Argentina Increase36
Chivor 
Higher contract sales primarily associated to an increase in contracted capacity at higher prices35
Lower spot sales mainly associated to lower generation and lower spot prices(37)
Other8
Total Chivor Increase6
Total Andes SBU Operating Margin Increase$24
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $8 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding restructuring charges.
Adjusted PTC decreased $4 million, driven by higher interest expense, mainly due to the issuance of debt at Argentina and lower interest capitalization in Cochrane and Chivor, and the write-off of water rights at Gener resulting from a business development project that is no longer pursued. These negative impacts were partially offset by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin, foreign currency gains in Argentina associated with the collection of financing receivables, prepayment of financial debt denominated in U.S. dollars in 2017, and lower foreign currency losses associated with the sale of Argentina’s sovereign bonds at Termoandes.
Free Cash Flow increased $237 million, of which $85 million was attributable to NCI. The increase was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
$98 million increase in Operating Margin (net of higher depreciation of $33 million and $41 million of environmental tax accruals in Chile impacting margin, but not free cash flow);
Decreases in working capital of $130 million primarily driven by higher VAT Refunds of $60 million at Alto Maipo and other Construction Projects and $38 million in collections of financing receivables related to the commencement of operations of Guillermo Brown and Cochrane; and
Increases in working capital of $55 million primarily related to $40 million in lower collections of receivables at Chivor.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by a net increase of $64 million in other drivers, primarily related to a $58 million decrease in taxes and $34 million in dividends received from Guacolda, partially offset by a $27 million increase in interest payments.


Fiscal year 2016 versus 2015
Including the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation and remeasurement of $36 million, Operating Margin increased $16 million, or 3%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Gener 
Lower spot prices on energy and fuel purchases$82
Start of operations of Cochrane Plant36
Other(3)
Total Gener Increase115
Argentina 
Higher rates driven by annual price review granted by Resolution 22/201661
Lower availability mainly associated with planned major maintenance(20)
Higher fixed costs primarily driven by higher inflation and by higher maintenance cost(44)
Unfavorable FX remeasurement impacts(21)
Total Argentina Decrease(24)
Chivor 
Higher volume of energy sales to Spot Market14
Unfavorable FX remeasurement impacts(15)
Lower spot sales prices(72)
Other(2)
Total Chivor Decrease(75)
Total Andes SBU Operating Margin Increase$16
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $24 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC decreased $92 million driven by the decrease in Equity Earnings of $54 million mainly related to Guacolda’s reorganization in September 2015, the decrease of $24 million in Adjusted Operating Margin and the increase of $12 million in interest expense primarily associated with lower interest capitalization after the beginning of commercial operations at Cochrane.
Free Cash Flow increased $40 million, none of which was attributable to NCI. The increase was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
An increase of $58 million in Operating Margin (net of $42 million in increased depreciation and other non-cash impacts);
Decrease in working capital of $178 million, primarily driven by $83 million in higher collections at Chivor related to Q4 2015 sales, a $38 million positive impact related to a one-time interest rate swap termination payment at Ventanas in July 2015, and $57 million in collections of financing receivables and maintenance remuneration from CAMMESSA in Argentina; and
Increases in working capital of $137 million primarily related to an increase in VAT accruals of $107 million related to our Cochrane and Alto Maipo construction projects.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by a $57 million increase in taxes at Chile and Chivor, a $29 million increase in interest payments at Gener due to new unsecured notes issued in July 2015 as part of the Ventanas refinancing, and a $27 million reduction in maintenance and non-recoverable capital expenditures due to lower expenditures on emissions and control equipment at Chile.
BRAZIL SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC, and Free Cash Flow (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016 $ Change 2016 vs. 2015 % Change 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Margin $203
 $186
 $397
 $17
 9 % $(211) -53 %
Adjusted Operating Margin 48
 41
 97
 7
 17 % (56) -58 %
Adjusted PTC 60
 38
 92
 22
 58 % (54) -59 %
Operating Cash Flow 469
 716
 136
 (247) (34)% 580
 NM
Free Cash Flow 279
 532
 (24) (253) (48)% 556
 NM
Free Cash Flow Attributable to NCI 204
 422
 5
 (218) (52)% 417
 NM
_____________________________
(1)
See Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.


Fiscal year 2017 versus 2016
Including the favorable impact of foreign currency translation of $19 million, Operating Margin increased $17 million, or 9%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Tietê 
Net impact of volume and prices of bilateral contracts due to higher energy purchased$(100)
Net impact of volume and prices of lower energy purchased in spot market71
Higher volume due to acquisition of new wind entities - Alto Sertão II23
Favorable FX impacts21
Other4
Total Tietê Increase19
Other Business Drivers(2)
Total Brazil SBU Operating Margin Increase$17
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $7 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests.
Adjusted PTC increased $22 million, driven by a $28 million increase from the settlement of a legal dispute with YPF at Uruguaiana as well as the $7 million of increase in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, partially offset by $5 million of higher interest expense over Alto Sertão II debt.
Free Cash Flow decreased $253 million, of which $218 million was attributable to NCI. The decrease was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
$35 million increase in Operating Margin (net of increased depreciation of $18 million);
$58 million decrease due to the sale of Sul in October 2016;
Increases in working capital of $913 million, primarily related to $600 million of higher costs deferred in net regulatory assets at Eletropaulo resulting from unfavorable hydrology in prior periods and $198 million of lower collections of energy sales at Eletropaulo due to higher tariff flags in 2016; and
Decreases in working capital of $445 million, primarily due to $411 million related to timing of payments for energy purchases due to lower energy costs and lower regulatory charges at Eletropaulo and Tietê.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by an increase of $240 million in other drivers, primarily related to $93 million of lower tax payments at Tietê and Eletropaulo, $71 million in lower interest paid at Tietê and Eletropaulo, and $60 million collected from a legal dispute settlement with YPF at Uruguaiana.
Fiscal year 2016 versus 2015
Including the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of $14 million, Operating Margin decreased $211 million, or 53%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Tietê 
Lower rates for energy sold under new contracts$(239)
Unfavorable FX impacts(14)
Higher fixed costs due to higher legal settlements(13)
Lower rates for energy purchases mainly due to decrease in spot market prices78
Other(2)
Total Tietê Decrease(190)
Uruguaiana 
Operations in 2015 compared to not operating in 2016(20)
Total Uruguaiana Decrease(20)
Other Business Drivers(1)
Total Brazil SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(211)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $56 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.
Adjusted PTC decreased $54 million, driven by the decrease of $56 million in Adjusted Operating Margin described above.
Free Cash Flow increased $556 million, of which $417 million was attributable to NCI. The increase was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
$308 million decrease in Operating Margin (net of $45 million in non-cash impacts, primarily due to the reversal of a contingent regulatory liability at Eletropaulo in 2015);


Decreases in working capital of $1.5 billion, primarily due to $974 million in higher collections of costs deferred in net regulatory assets at Eletropaulo and Sul resulting from unfavorable hydrology in 2015 and $416 million of higher collections on energy sales in 2016; and
Increases in working capital of $623 million primarily due to $581 million related to regulatory charges and timing of payments for energy purchases at Eletropaulo and Sul in 2016.
MCAC SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC, and Free Cash Flow (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016 $ Change 2016 vs. 2015 % Change 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Margin $589
 $523
 $543
 $66
 13% $(20) -4 %
Adjusted Operating Margin 470
 413
 438
 57
 14% (25) -6 %
Adjusted PTC 340
 267
 327
 73
 27% (60) -18 %
Operating Cash Flow 427
 312
 705
 115
 37% (393) -56 %
Free Cash Flow 345
 219
 625
 126
 58% (406) -65 %
Free Cash Flow Attributable to NCI 61
 51
 127
 10
 20% (76) -60 %
_____________________________
(1)
See Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses. AES owned 92% of Andres and Los Mina and 46% of Itabo in the Dominican Republic until December 2015 when the ownership changed to 90% at Andres and Los Mina and 45% at Itabo until October 2017.
Fiscal year 2017 versus 2016
Operating Margin increased $66 million, or 13%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Dominican Republic 
Higher contracted energy sales net of LNG fuel consumption mainly driven by Los Mina combined cycle commencement of operations in June 2017$34
Other6
Total Dominican Republic Increase40
Mexico
Higher availability as a result of a plant forced maintenance in 201613
Other7
Total Mexico Increase20
Other Business Drivers6
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Increase$66
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $57 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives and one-time restructuring charges.costs associated with dispositions of business interests.
Adjusted PTC increased $73decreased $64 million, primarily driven by the increasedecrease in Adjusted Operating Margin of $57 million as described above.
Free Cash Flowabove and increased $126 million, of which $10 million was attributable to NCI. The increase was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
$73 million increase in Operating Margin (net of higher depreciation of $7 million);
Decreases in working capital in Dominican Republic of $61 millioninterest expense primarily at Southland Energy due to the collection of past overdue amounts as partlower capitalized interest following completion of the sale of receivables executed with the distribution companiesCCGT units and CDEEE in 2017; and
Increases in working capital in Puerto Rico of $10 million primarily related to lower payments and collections caused by Hurricane Maria.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by lower tax payments of $17 million in El Salvador and a $10 million decrease in maintenance and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures,new debt issuances, partially offset by higher interest paymentsa gain on sale of land held by AES Redondo Beach at Southland, lower pension expense at IPL, and an increase in Dominican Republicallocation of $25 million due to the issuance of new Senior Notesearnings from equity affiliates driven by renewable projects that came online in Los Mina.2020 at sPower.


Fiscal year 20162019 versus 20152018
Operating Margin decreased $20increased $21 million, or 4%3%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Mexico 
Lower availability and related costs$(11)
Other(6)
Total Mexico Decrease(17)
El Salvador 
Higher fixed costs and lower energy sales margin(10)
Total El Salvador Decrease(10)
Panama 
Expenses related to the ongoing construction of a natural gas generation plant and a liquefied natural gas terminal(19)
Commencement of power barge operations at the end of March 201513
Other(3)
Total Panama Decrease(9)
Dominican Republic 
Higher contracted and spot energy sales24
Total Dominican Republic Increase24
Other Business Drivers(8)
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(20)
Increase at IPL primarily driven by higher retail rates following the 2018 rate order, partially offset by lower volumes due to unfavorable weather and higher maintenance expense related to distribution line clearance$59 
Increase at DPL due to the 2018 distribution rate order, including the decoupling rider which is designed to eliminate the impacts of weather and demand, partially offset by changes to DPL's ESP22 
Decrease due to the sale and closure of generation facilities at Shady Point and DPL, including cost recoveries from DPL's joint owners of Stuart and Killen(47)
Decrease in Puerto Rico mainly driven by an increase of rock ash disposal(23)
Other10 
Total US and Utilities SBU Operating Margin Increase$21
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $25$19 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.derivatives and costs and benefits associated with early plant closures.
Adjusted PTC decreased $60increased $58 million, primarily driven by an increase in earnings attributable to AES as a result of contributions from new renewable projects and lower interest expense at DPL, partially offset by the decrease in Adjusted Operating Margin of $25 million described above as well as a 2015 compensation agreement regarding early termination of the original Barge PPA of $10 million and a $26 million allowance recognizeddecrease in 2016 at Puerto Rico.
Free Cash Flow decreased $406 million, of which $76 million was attributable to NCI. The decrease was driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
A decrease of $10 million in Operating Margin (net of $10 million in depreciation); and
Increases in working capital of $338 million, primarily related to higher accounts receivable balancesAFUDC for the Dominican Republic of $243 million due to collections of overdue receivables in September 2015 and for Puerto Rico of $47 million primarily due to lower sales in Q4 2015.Eagle Valley CCGT project at IPL.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by a $13 million increase in maintenance and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures.


93 | 2020 Annual Report
EURASIA
South America SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC and Free Cash Flow (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016 $ Change 2016 vs. 2015 % Change 2016 vs. 2015
Operating Margin $423
 $429
 $452
 $(6) -1 % $(23) -5 %
Adjusted Operating Margin 308
 305
 346
 3
 1 % (41) -12 %
Adjusted PTC 290
 283
 331
 7
 2 % (48) -15 %
Operating Cash Flow 610
 892
 354
 (282) -32 % 538
 NM
Free Cash Flow 586
 865
 437
 (279) -32 % 428
 98 %
Free Cash Flow Attributable to NCI 173
 177
 112
 (4) -2 % 65
 58 %
For the Years Ended December 31,202020192018$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019$ Change 2019 vs. 2018% Change 2019 vs. 2018
Operating Margin$1,243 $873 $1,017 $370 42 %$(144)-14 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
550 499 612 51 10 %(113)-18 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
534 504 519 30 %(15)-3 %
_____________________________
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses. In addition, AES owned 24.35% of AES Brasil until August 2020 when ownership increased to 42.85%, and increased again to 44.13% in December 2020 due to acquisition of additional shares in the company.
(1)
See Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
Fiscal year 20172020 versus 20162019
Operating Margin decreased $6increased $370 million, or 1%, and Adjusted Operating Margin increased $3 million, or 1%, with no material drivers.
Adjusted PTC increased $7 million, primarily driven by the increase of in Adjusted Operating Margin, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.
Free Cash Flow decreased $279 million, of which $4 million was attributable to NCI. The decrease was primarily driven by changes in net cash provided by operating activities, specifically:
A decrease of $28 million in Operating Margin (net of $22 million in decreased depreciation);


A reduction in cash receipts of $362 million, primarily attributable to a $360 million payment made in April 2016 from NEK, net of payments to the fuel supplier, for Maritza related to overdue receivables; and
Decreases in working capital of $64 million primarily related to lower working capital requirements of $50 million at Masinloc and Mong Duong due to the timing of payments for coal purchases.
Free Cash Flow was also impacted by a $25 million reduction in maintenance and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures and a $20 million decrease in interest payments.
Fiscal year 2016 versus 2015
Including the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of $36 million, Operating Margin decreased $23 million, or 5%42%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Kazakhstan 
Unfavorable FX impact due to KZT depreciation against USD$(29)
Other(1)
Total Kazakhstan Decrease(30)
Maritza 
Lower contracted capacity prices due to PPA amendment(18)
Other(2)
Total Maritza Decrease(20)
Ballylumford 
Higher contracted revenues27
Lower plant capacity resulting from the retirement of one generation facility(21)
Total Ballylumford Increase6
Mong Duong 
Impact of full year operations for 2016 compared to commencement of principal operations in April 201516
Total Mong Duong Increase16
Other Business Drivers5
Total Eurasia SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(23)
Increase in Chile primarily related to early contract terminations at Angamos$302 
Increase in Brazil mainly due to a reduction in cost of sales as a result of a revision to the GSF liability, partially offset by depreciation of the Brazilian real against the USD140 
Recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile57 
Lower reservoir levels as a result of the life extension project at Chivor during Q1 2020 and drier hydrology in Colombia(108)
Lower capacity prices (Resolution 31/2020) in Argentina partially offset by the impact of new wind projects beginning commercial operations in 2020(21)
Total South America SBU Operating Margin Increase$370
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $41increased $51 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealizedthe net gains and losses on derivatives.early contract terminations at Angamos.
Adjusted PTC decreased $48increased $30 million, mainly driven by the decrease of $41 millionincrease in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, as well as lower equity earnings at OPGC in Indiainterest expense due to incremental capitalized interest at Alto Maipo. These positive impacts were partially offset by realized FX losses and lower tariffsinterest income primarily driven by lower interest rates on CAMMESA receivables in Argentina, and the net impact of higher interest expense and higher interest income at Mong Duong.
Free Cash Flow increased $428 million, of which $65 million was attributable to NCI. The increase was driven by a $26 million reduction in maintenance and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures and changes in net cash provided by operating activities comprising:
A decrease of $43 million in Operating Margin (net of $20 million in decreased depreciation and other non-cash impacts);
Increases in working capital of $472 million from increased collections of $360 million at Maritza from NEK, net of payments to the fuel supplier, and a reduction in working capital requirements of $58 million at Mong DuongBrazil due to higher working capital needsinflation rates.
Fiscal year 2019 versus 2018
Operating Margin decreased $144 million, or 14%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Decrease in Argentina primarily driven by lower generation and lower energy and capacity prices as defined by resolution 1/2019, which modified generators' remuneration schemes$(59)
Decrease due to the depreciation of the Colombian peso and Brazilian real against the USD, offset by savings in fixed costs as a result of the depreciation of the Argentine peso(38)
Decrease in Chile primarily due to lower contracted energy sales and lower efficient plant availability, partially offset by lower spot prices on energy purchases(30)
Decrease due to the sale of Electrica Santiago and the transmission lines in 2018(21)
Decrease in Chile primarily due to higher fixed costs associated with IT initiatives and realized FX losses related to forward instruments, partially offset by savings on employee expenses(11)
Decrease in Brazil primarily driven by lower spot sales and prices, partially offset by higher contracted energy sales(10)
Increase in Colombia due to higher spot prices primarily driven by drier system hydrology30 
Increase in Brazil due to new solar plants in operation10 
Other(15)
Total South America SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(144)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $113 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC decreased $15 million, mainly driven by the decrease in 2015Adjusted Operating Margin described above, partially offset by realized FX gains in preparationArgentina and Chile in 2019 as compared to losses in 2018, and higher equity earnings in 2019 related to better operating results at Guacolda.


94 | 2020 Annual Report

MCAC SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC (in millions) for commencementthe periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31,202020192018$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019$ Change 2019 vs. 2018% Change 2019 vs. 2018
Operating Margin$559 $487 $534 $72 15 %$(47)-9 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
394 352 391 42 12 %(39)-10 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
287 367 300 (80)-22 %67 22 %
_____________________________
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of plant operations;NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
Fiscal year 2020 versus 2019
Operating Margin increased $72 million, or 15%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Higher availability in Panama mainly due to the outage of Changuinola in 2019 for the tunnel lining upgrade$63 
Increase in Panama driven by improved hydrology resulting in higher net spot market sales43 
Increase in Dominican Republic due to higher LNG sales margin driven by the Eastern Pipeline COD in 202027 
Increase in Panama mainly driven by higher availability and capacity tank revenue and lower fixed costs, partially offset by lower energy sales margin at the Colon combined cycle plant
Decrease in Dominican Republic related to Andres facility due to steam turbine failure in 2020 and business interruption insurance recovered in 2019(49)
Decrease in Panama driven by lower margin at the Estrella de Mar I power barge mainly due to disconnection from the grid in August 2020(26)
Other
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Increase$72
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $42 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC decreased $80 million, mainly driven by insurance recoveries associated with property damage at Andres and Changuinola in 2019, partially offset by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin described above.
Fiscal year 2019 versus 2018
Operating Margin decreased $47 million, or 9%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Lower availability due to the outage of Changuinola for the tunnel lining upgrade$(123)
Lower availability driven by lower hydrology in Panama(40)
Decrease in Dominican Republic due to lower energy prices(18)
Lower energy costs and business interruption insurance recovered due to the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 201845 
Higher contract sales at Panama mainly driven by contract renewals at higher prices41 
Higher sales at Panama driven by the commencement of operations at the Colon combined cycle facility in September 201840 
Increase in Mexico due to pension plan pass-through adjustment12 
Other(4)
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(47)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $39 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $67 million, mainly driven by the insurance recoveries associated with property damage at Andres and Changuinola, partially offset by a decrease in Adjusted Operating Margin described above.


95 | 2020 Annual Report

Eurasia SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31,202020192018$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019$ Change 2019 vs. 2018% Change 2019 vs. 2018
Operating Margin$186 $188 $227 $(2)-1 %$(39)-17 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
142 148 194 (6)-4 %(46)-24 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
177 159 222 18 11 %(63)-28 %
_____________________________
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
Fiscal year 2020 versus 2019
Operating Margin decreased $2 million, or 1%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Impact of the sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford businesses in June 2019(6)
Other
Total Eurasia SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(2)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $6 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $18 million, mainly driven by lower interest expense due to regular debt repayments in Bulgaria and a positive variance in OPGC equity earnings, partially offset by the decrease in Adjusted Operating Margin described above.
Fiscal year 2019 versus 2018
Operating Margin decreased $39 million, or 17%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Impact of the sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford businesses in June 2019$(46)
Impact of the sale of the Masinloc power plant in March 2018(24)
Lower depreciation at the Jordan plants due to their classification as held-for-sale20 
Decreases in working capital of $47 million attributable to a $24 million decrease in CO2 allowances due to a price decrease at Maritza and a higher interest expense of $34 million as capitalization of interest ceased upon COD of Mong Duong in 2015.
Other11 
Total Eurasia SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(39)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $46 million, primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC decreased $63 million, primarily driven by the decrease in Adjusted Operating Margin discussed above, as well as a decrease in earnings at OPGC and the sale of Elsta, our equity affiliate in the Netherlands.
Key Trends and Uncertainties
During 20182021 and beyond, we expect to face the following challenges at certain of our businesses. Management expects that improved operating performance at certain businesses, growth from new businesses, and global cost reduction initiatives may lessen or offset their impact. If these favorable effects do not occur, or if the challenges described below and elsewhere in this section impact us more significantly than we currently anticipate, or if volatile foreign currencies and commodities move more unfavorably, then these adverse factors (or other adverse factors unknown to us) may have a material impact on our operating margin, net income attributable to The AES Corporation and cash flows. We continue to monitor our operations and address challenges as they arise. For the risk factors related to our business, see Item 1.—Business and Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted global economic activity, including electricity and energy consumption, and caused significant volatility in financial markets. The following discussion highlights our assessment of the impacts of the pandemic on our current financial and operating status, and our financial and operational outlook based on information known as of this filing. Also see Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic we have conducted our essential operations without significant disruption. We derive approximately 85% of our total revenues from our regulated utilities and long-term sales and


96 | 2020 Annual Report

supply contracts or PPAs at our generation businesses, which contributes to a relatively stable revenue and cost structure at most of our businesses. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the energy market materialized in our operational locations in the second quarter and was generally better than our revised expectations for the second half of 2020. Across our global portfolio, our utilities businesses experienced a low single digit percentage decline in the fourth quarter. Our business model outside of utilities is primarily based on take-or-pay contracts or tolling agreements, with limited exposure to demand. Any uncontracted portion of our generation business is exposed to increased price risk resulting from lower demand associated with the pandemic. We are also experiencing a decline in electricity spot prices in some of our markets due to lower system demand. While we cannot predict the length and magnitude of the pandemic or how it could impact global economic conditions, a delayed recovery with respect to demand may adversely impact our financial results for 2021.
We continue to monitor and manage our credit exposures in a prudent manner. Our credit exposures have continued in-line with historical levels and within the customary 45-60 day grace period. These impacts are expected to be partially offset by recoveries through U.S. regulatory rate-making mechanisms and a combination of the securitization of customer payment moratorium receivables and agreements with the generating companies in El Salvador. We have not experienced material credit-related impacts from our PPA offtakers due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our supply chain management has remained robust during this challenging time and we continue to closely manage and monitor developments. We continue to experience certain minor delays in some of our development projects, primarily in permitting processes and the implementation of interconnections, due to governments and other authorities having limited capacity to perform their functions.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law on March 27, 2020. While we currently expect a limited impact from this legislation on our business, certain elements such as changes in the deductibility of interest may provide some cash benefits in the near term.
Additionally, the Company continues to monitor the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our financial results and operations, which may result in the need to record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in the jurisdictions where we operate.
Macroeconomic and Political
The macroeconomic and political environments in some countries where our subsidiaries conduct business have changed during


2017. 2020. This could result in significant impacts to tax laws and environmental and energy policies. Additionally, we operate in multiple countries and as such are subject to volatility in exchange rates at the subsidiary level. See Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for further information.
Argentina— In the run up to the 2019 Presidential elections, the Argentine peso devalued significantly and the government of Argentina imposed capital controls and announced a restructuring of Argentina’s debt payments. Restrictions on the flow of capital have limited the availability of international credit, and economic conditions in Argentina have further deteriorated, triggering additional devaluation of the Argentine peso and a deterioration of the country’s risk profile. Following the election of Alberto Fernández in October 2019, the administration has been evaluating solutions to the Argentine economic crisis. On February 27, 2020, the Secretariat of Energy passed Resolution No. 31/2020 that includes the denomination of tariffs in local currency indexed by local inflation (currently delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic), and reductions in capacity payments received by generators. These regulatory changes have negatively impacted our financial results. In addition, Argentina restructured its public debt in 2020 through an agreement with its international creditors. Although the situation in Argentina remains challenging, it has not had a material impact on our current exposures to date, and payments on the long-term receivables for the FONINVEMEM Agreements are current. For further information, see Note 7—Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.
Chile — In October 2019, Chile saw significant protests associated with economic conditions resulting in the declaration of a state of emergency in several major cities. In response to the social unrest, the Chilean government held a referendum in October 2020, which determined that a new constitution will be drafted by a constitutional convention. A second vote will be held alongside municipal and gubernatorial elections in April 2021 to elect the members of the constitutional convention. A third vote, which is expected to occur in 2022, would accept or reject the new constitution after it is drafted. Other initiatives to address the concerns of the protesters are under consideration by Congress and could result in regulatory or policy changes that may affect our results of operations in Chile.


97 | 2020 Annual Report

In November 2019, the Chilean government enacted Law 21,185 that establishes a Stabilization Fund for regulated energy prices. Historically, the government updated the prices for regulated energy contracts every six months to reflect the indexation the contracts have to exchange rates and commodities prices. The new law freezes regulated prices and does not allow the pass-through of these contractual indexation updates to customers beyond the pricing in effect at July 1, 2019, until new lower-cost renewable contracts are incorporated into pricing in 2023. Consequently, costs incurred in excess of the July 1, 2019 price will be accumulated and borne by generators. The receivables will be paid by distribution companies and the face value will be recognized by a Tariff Decree issued by the regulator every six months. On December 31, 2020, AES Gener executed an agreement for the sale of $105 million of receivables generated pursuant the Tariff Stabilization Law at a discount of $20 million. Of the $85 million of net receivables outstanding pursuant the Tariff Stabilization Law, $23 million were collected by AES Gener in February 2021.
Puerto Rico— Our subsidiaries in Puerto Rico have long-term PPAs with state-owned PREPA, which has been facing economic challenges that could result in a material adverse effect on our business in Puerto Rico.
The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) was enacted to create a structure for exercising federal oversight over the fiscal affairs of U.S. territories and created procedures for adjusting debt accumulated by the Puerto Rico government and, potentially, other territories (“Title III”). PROMESA also expedites the approval of key energy projects and other critical projects in Puerto Rico.
PROMESA allowed for the establishment of an Oversight Board with broad powers of budgetary and financial control over Puerto Rico. The Oversight Board filed for bankruptcy on behalf of PREPA under Title III in July 2017. As a result of the bankruptcy filing, AES Puerto Rico and AES Ilumina’s non-recourse debt of $238 million and $31 million, respectively, continue to be in technical default and are classified as current as of December 31, 2020. The Company is in compliance with its debt payment obligations as of December 31, 2020.
The Company's receivable balances in Puerto Rico as of December 31, 2020 totaled $55 million, of which $1 million was overdue. Despite the Title III protection, PREPA has been making substantially all of its payments to the generators in line with historical payment patterns.
On January 2, 2020, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed a bill that prohibits the disposal and unencapsulated beneficial use of coal combustion residuals in Puerto Rico. Prior to this bill's approval, the Company had put in place arrangements to dispose or beneficially use its coal ash and combustion residual outside of Puerto Rico.
Considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our long-lived assets in Puerto Rico of $534 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2020.
Reference Rate Reform — In July 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. In the U.S., the Alternative Reference Rate Committee at the Federal Reserve identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR; alternative reference rates in other key markets are under development. On November 30, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Association ("IBA") announced it had begun consultation on its intention to cease publication of two specific LIBOR rates by December 31, 2021, while extending the timeline for the overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month, and 12-month USD LIBOR rates through June 30, 2023. The IBA expects to make separate announcements in this regard following the outcome of the consultation. AES holds a substantial amount of debt and derivative contracts referencing LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark. Although the full impact of the reform remains unknown, we have begun to engage with AES counterparties to discuss specific action items to be undertaken in order to prepare for amendments when they become due.
United States Tax Law Reform
OnFederal Taxes — In December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Act”).TCJA. The legislation significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other things, lowering the corporate income tax rate, introducing new limitations on interest expense deductions, subjecting foreign earnings in excess of an allowable return to current U.S. taxation, and adopting a semi-territorial corporate tax system. These changes willimpacted our 2018 and 2019 effective tax rates and may materially impact our effective tax rate in future periods. Furthermore, we anticipate that growth in our U.S. businesses and higher U.S. tax expense may fully utilize our remaining net operating loss carryforwards in the near term, which could lead to material cash tax payments in the United States. Specific provisions of the 2017 Act and their potential impacts on the Company are noted below. Our interpretation of the 2017 ActTCJA may change asin the event the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service issue additional guidance. Such changes may be material.
Lower Tax RateThe corporateCompany's effective tax rate decreasedin 2020 reflects the application of the GILTI high-tax exclusion under the final regulations published on July 23, 2020. This election reduced our provision for GILTI income from, 35 percent


98 | 2020 Annual Report

among others, certain subsidiaries in Chile and the Dominican Republic. Should these subsidiaries fail to 21 percent beginning in 2018. In addition to deferred tax remeasurement impacts,qualify for the lower tax rate will result inexclusion under the recognition, at December 31, 2017, of a regulatory liability at IPL and DPL. The regulatory liability will reflect deferred taxes that will flow back to ratepayers over time.
Limitation on Interest Expense Deductions— The 2017 Act introduced a new limitation on the deductibility of net interest expense beginning January 1, 2018. The deduction will be limited to interest income, plus 30 percent of tax basis EBITDA through 2021 (30 percent of EBIT beginning January 1, 2022). This determination is made at the consolidated group level, although it applies separately to partnerships. The limitation does not apply to interest expense attributable to regulated utility property. The U.S. Treasury and Internal Revenue Service are expected to provide guidance to clarify how the exception will apply to regulated utility holding companies. Given typical project financing and current U.S. holding company debt levels, we anticipate that this limitation will materially, negatively impact our effective tax rate.
Cost Recovery — The 2017 Act amended depreciation rules to provide full expensing (100% bonus depreciation) for assets that commence construction and are placed in service before January 1, 2023. This provision is phased down by 20 percent ratably through 2027. The immediate full expensing provision is elective, but it does not apply to regulated utility property. This change is not expected to impactregulations, the Company’s effective tax rate; however, if elected, it could impactU.S. taxable income and cash taxes inconsolidated income tax expense for 2020 may be materially impacted. These regulations may materially impact our future periods.
Transition to a Participation Exemption System — A transition tax will be imposed on previously untaxed, deferred foreign earnings at a rate of either 8 percent or 15.5 percent, depending on the liquidity of the underlying foreign earnings. Prospectively, a 100 percent dividends received deduction will apply to foreign source dividends upon repatriation.
Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”) —A new provision in the U.S. tax law subjects the foreign earnings of foreign subsidiaries to current U.S. taxation to the extent that those earnings exceed an allowable economic return on investment. The allowable return is 10 percent of the adjusted tax basis in the foreign subsidiaries’ tangible property, reduced by interest expense. The foreign earnings subject to current taxation under the GILTI provision are not limited to those derived from intangible property and may include gains derived from some future asset sales. Although the new GILTI rules provide for a reduced 10.5 percentyear effective tax rate on captured income (increasing to 13.125% January 1, 2026), by way of a 50 percent deduction, companies with a net operating loss or otherwise insufficient taxable income will not benefit from the lower effectiverates and future cash tax rate and may not be able to utilize foreign tax credits.obligations.
We expect that the GILTI provision may capture a very significant portion of our foreign earnings and subject those foreign earnings to current U.S. taxation. As a result, we expect the GILTI provision to materially, negatively impact our effective tax rate. Prospectively, the consequences of the new GILTI provision may be mitigated by foreign tax credits. However, additional guidance from the U.S. Treasury and Internal Revenue Service will be required to determine the extent to which the Company will be able to claim such foreign tax credits and mitigate the negative consequences of the GILTI provision.
State TaxesThe reactions of the individual states to federal tax reform are still evolving. Most states will assess whether and how the federal changes will be incorporated into their state tax legislation. As we expect higher taxable income in the future due toat the federal changes,level, this may also lead to higher state taxable income. Our current state tax provisions predominantly have full valuation allowances against state net operating losses. These positions will be re-assessed in the future as state tax law evolves and may result in


material changes in position.
U.S. Renewable Tax Equity StructuresCreditsOur U.S.The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("CAA, 2021") became law on December 27, 2020. Included in the CAA, 2021 is the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020 ("TCDTRA"), which extends the sunset or phase-down periods of federal tax credits related to the development and operation of certain renewable energy portfolio operates primarily throughelectric generating facilities, and provides new tax equity partnerships. We cannotcredit extension rules specifically applying to offshore wind power electric generating facilities. Specifically, the TCDTRA extends the 26% Investment Tax Credit for qualified solar projects beginning construction in 2021 and 2022 that are placed in service before January 1, 2026 and permits a 22% Investment Tax Credit for qualified projects beginning construction in 2023 that are placed in service before January 1, 2026. It also extends the 60% Production Tax Credit for onshore wind by one year, allowing qualified wind projects beginning construction in 2021 to be certaineligible.
In addition to the tax credit extenders, the TCDTRA provides for a five-year extension of the impactscontrolled foreign corporation look-through rule through 2025. Under this rule, dividends and interest paid by one controlled foreign subsidiary to another are exempt from U.S. tax reformtax. AES currently relies on the controlled foreign corporation look-through rule to exempt dividends and interest paid between foreign subsidiaries from current U.S. tax.
Decarbonization Initiatives
Several initiatives have been announced by regulators and offtakers in recent years, with the intention of reducing GHG emissions generated by the energy industry. Our strategy of shifting towards clean energy platforms, including renewable energy, energy storage, LNG, and modernized grids is designed to position us for continued growth while reducing our carbon intensity. The shift to renewables has caused certain customers to migrate to other low-carbon energy solutions and this trend may have on availabilitycontinue. Certain of our contracts contain clauses designed to compensate for early contract terminations, but we cannot guarantee full recovery. Although the Company cannot currently estimate the financial impact of these decarbonization initiatives, new legislative or pricing of tax equity for future growth opportunities. Impacts of provisions such as the lower tax rate and immediate expensing may impact the amount and timing of returns allocable to our partnersregulatory programs further restricting carbon emissions could require material capital expenditures, result in our existing tax equity structures.
SAB 118— As further explained in Note 20—Income Taxes included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K we have included certain reasonable estimatesa reduction of the impactestimated useful life of U.S. tax law reform subjectcertain coal facilities, or have other material adverse effects on our financial results. For further discussion of our strategy of shifting towards clean energy platforms see Item 1—Executive Summary.
Chilean Decarbonization PlanThe Chilean government has announced an initiative to potential adjustments in future periods.
Puerto Rico — Our subsidiaries in Puerto Rico have long-term PPAsphase out coal power plants by 2040 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. On June 4, 2019, AES Gener signed an agreement with state-owned PREPA, which has been facing economic challenges that could impact the Company.
In orderChilean government to address these challenges, on June 30, 2016,cease the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) was signed into law. PROMESA createdoperation of two coal units for a structure for exercising federal oversight over the fiscal affairstotal of U.S. territories and allowed for the establishment of an Oversight Board with broad powers of budgetary and financial control over Puerto Rico. PROMESA also created procedures for adjusting debts accumulated by the Puerto Rico government and, potentially, other territories (“Title III”). Finally, PROMESA expedites the approval of key energy projects and other critical projects in Puerto Rico.
PREPA entered into preliminary Restructuring Support Agreements (“RSAs”) with their lenders. Under PROMESA, PREPA submitted the RSA to the Oversight Board for approval on April 28, 2017, which the board denied on June 28, 2017. As a consequence, on July 2, 2017, the Oversight Board filed for bankruptcy on behalf of PREPA under Title III.
As a result322 MW as part of the bankruptcy filing,phase-out. Under the agreement, Ventanas 1 (114 MW) will cease operation in November 2022 and Ventanas 2 (208 MW) in May 2024; however AES Puerto Rico and AES Ilumina’s non-recourse debt of $365 million and $36 million, respectively, are in default and have been classified as current as of December 31, 2017.
Additionally, on July 18, 2017, Moody's downgraded AES Puerto Rico to Caa1 from B3 due to the heightened default risk for AES Puerto Rico as a result of PREPA's bankruptcy protection. This protection gives PREPA the ability to renegotiate contracts, which could impact the value of our assets in Puerto Rico or otherwise have a material impact on the Company. In this regard, PREPA had requested the Company to renegotiate its 24 MW AES Ilumina’s PPA. After the event of the Hurricanes Maria and Irma, these negotiations were put on hold.
In September 2017, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands were severely impacted by Hurricanes Irma and Maria, disrupting the operations of AES Puerto Rico, AES Ilumina, and certain Distributed Energy assets. The Company sustained modest damage to its 24 MW AES Ilumina solar plant, resulting in a $2 million loss, and minor damage to its 524 MW AES Puerto Rico thermal plants, both located in Puerto Rico.
As a result of the hurricanes, PREPAGener has declared an event of Force Majeure. However, both units of AES Puerto Rico and approximately 75% of AES Ilumina have been available to generate electricity since mid-October which, in accordance with the PPAs, will allow AES Puerto Rico to invoice capacity, even under Force Majeure. Puerto Rico’s infrastructure was severely damaged, including electric infrastructure and transmission lines. The extensive structural damage caused by hurricane winds and flooding is expected to take significant time and cost to repair.
Due to the extensive damage from the hurricanes, energy demand in Puerto Rico has decreased and is expected to remain low until economic activity has recovered. Despite the decrease in demand, AES Puerto Rico has resumed generation and continues to be the lowest cost and EPA compliant energy provider in Puerto Rico. Therefore, we expect AES Puerto Rico to continue to be a critical supplier to PREPA.
On October 24, 2017, the U.S. Congress approved a $37 billion emergency disaster relief bill which will allow the U.S. Government to help victims from the hurricanes and assist with the infrastructure rebuild in the affected areas through the Federal Emergency Management Agency. This supplemental appropriation includes an allocation of $5 billion for the Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program to assist local governments, like Puerto Rico, in providing essential services, such as reestablishing electricity.
In November 2017, AES Puerto Rico signed a Forbearance and Standstill Agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events. This agreement will expire on March 22, 2018.
The Company's receivable balances in Puerto Rico as of December 31, 2017 totaled $86 million, of which $53 million was overdue. Despite the disruption caused by the hurricanes and the Title III protection, PREPA has


restarted the payments to the generators. AES Puerto Rico has been able to collect $28 million of overdue amounts as of December 31, 2017.
In January 2018, Puerto Rico announced its intention to privatize PREPA. The plan will needaccelerate the disconnection of these units. On December 26, 2020, the Chilean government issued Supreme Decree Number 42, which allows coal plants to be approved byremain connected to the Oversight Board,grid in “strategic reserve status” for five years after ceasing operations, receive a reduced capacity payment, and dispatch, if approved, could take 18 monthsnecessary, to complete. Itensure the electric system’s reliability. On December 29, 2020, Ventanas 1 ceased operation and entered "strategic reserve status." Ventanas 2 is difficultalso expected to predict the outcome of the proposed privatization, but the impact on our businessesenter "strategic reserve status" in Puerto Rico and AES could be material.
August 2021. See Item 1—BusinessSouth America SBUChilefor further discussion. Considering the information available as of the filing date, Managementmanagement believes the carrying amount of our coal-fired long-lived assets in Chile of $1.9 billion is recoverable as of December 31, 2020.
Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act On April 11, 2019, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed the Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act (“the Act”) establishing guidelines for grid efficiency and eliminating coal as a source for electricity generation by January 1, 2028. The Act supports the accelerated deployment of renewables through the Renewable Portfolio Standard and the conversion of coal generating facilities to other fuel sources, with compliance targets of 40% by 2025, 60% by 2040, and 100% by 2050. AES Puerto Rico’s long-term PPA with PREPA expires November 30, 2027. PREPA and AES Puerto Rico have discussed different strategic alternatives, but have yet to reach any agreement. Any agreement that may be reached would be subject to lender and


99 | 2020 Annual Report

regulatory approval, including that of the Oversight Board that filed for bankruptcy on behalf of PREPA. The Company is evaluating certain developments occurring during the first quarter of 2021 to determine if a reassessment of the recoverability and useful life of the plant is necessary. Considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our long-lived assets in Puerto Rico of $627$534 million is recoverable and no reserve on the receivables is necessary as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Brazil Hawaii Brazilian President Michael Temer continues to seek economic reformsIn July 2020, the Hawaii State Legislature passed a bill that would improvewill prohibit AES Hawaii from generating electricity from coal after December 31, 2022. As this will restrict the Company from contracting the asset beyond the expiration of its existing PPA, management reassessed the economic outlook in Brazil, which may benefit our businessesuseful life of the generation facility. A decrease in the country. Corruption investigationsuseful life was identified as an impairment indicator. The Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amount of the asset group was not recoverable. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $38 million. AES Hawaii is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
For further information about the risks associated with decarbonization initiatives, see Item 1A.—Risk FactorsConcerns about GHG emissions and the 2018 presidential campaignpotential risks associated with climate change have limited Mr. Temer's abilityled to implement these reforms. Despite these limitations, the Brazilian economy is showing moderate signs of improvement.increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses included in this Form 10-K.
United Kingdom — In June 2016, the United Kingdom ("U.K.") held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (“E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit.” In December 2017, the U.K. and E.U. agreed terms to conclude Phase 1 negotiations and have moved into Phase 2 of negotiations with respect to long-term trading relationship and a potential transitional period. The U.K. is expected to exit the E.U. on March 29, 2019. While the full impact of the Brexit remains uncertain, these changes may adversely affect our operations and financial results.
Regulatory
International Trade Commission — In September 2017, the U.S. International Trade Commission ("ITC") determined that serious injury has been caused by foreign solar photovoltaic panels to U.S. manufacturers. The ITC proposed recommendations for remedies that include tariffs at various levels, a quota system and licensing fees. In January 2018, the U.S. President approved tariffs of 30% in the first year, which will gradually decrease to 15% over four years. AES is evaluating the impact of these tariffs, but they will likely increase the cost of solar photovoltaic panels in the short term. The Company has taken mitigating action to limit our exposure to these increased costs, such as acquiring solar panels for committed projects in 2017 in anticipation of the new tariff, however these tariffs may impact the economics of future solar development projects in the U.S., including those of our solar businesses.
Maritza PPA Review The DG Comp continues tois conducting a preliminary review of whether AES Maritza’s PPA with NEK is compliant with the European Commission’s state aidUnion's State Aid rules. Although no formal investigation has been launched by DG Comp to date, AES Maritza has engaged in discussions with the DG Comp case team and representatives of Bulgaria to discuss the agency’s review. In the near term, Maritza expects that it willto engage in discussions with Bulgaria (with the involvement of DG Comp) to attempt to reach a negotiated resolution concerning DG Comp’s review. Separately, Bulgaria recently submitted its proposed plan for the reform of its electricity market to the European Commission (the “Market Reform Plan”). The proposed Market Reform Plan is part of Bulgaria’s plan to introduce a market-wide capacity remuneration mechanism, which would require approval by DG Comp. The Market Reform Plan proposes a deadline of June 30, 2021 for the termination of AES Maritza’s PPA, and anticipates discussions with AES Maritza about that issue. We do not believe termination of the PPA is justified, nor do we believe that the unilaterally proposed deadline for the termination of the PPA is realistic, given that the discussions with Bulgaria have not yet begun. We expect that the anticipated discussions with Bulgaria could involve a range of potential outcomes, including but not limited to the termination of the PPA and payment of some level of compensation to AES Maritza. Any negotiated resolution would be subject to mutually acceptable terms, lender consent, and DG Comp approval. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of the anticipated discussions between AES Maritza and Bulgaria, nor can we predict how DG Comp might resolve its review if the discussions fail to result in an agreement concerning the review. AES Maritza believes that its PPA is legal and in compliance with all applicable laws, and it will take all actions necessary to protect its interests, whether through negotiated agreement or otherwise. However, there can be no assurances that this matter will be resolved favorably; if it is not, there could be a material adverse impacteffect on Maritza’s and the Company’s respective financial statements.condition, results of operation, and cash flows.
Alto Maipo
Alto Maipo has experienced construction difficulties which have resulted in increased projected costs overConsidering the original $2 billion budget. These overages led to a series of negotiations with the intention of restructuring the project’s existing financial structure and obtaining additional funding. On March 17, 2017, AES Gener completed a legal and financial restructuring of Alto Maipo. As a part of this restructuring, AES Gener simultaneously acquired a 40% ownership interest from Minera Los Pelambres (“MLP”), a noncontrolling shareholder, for nominal consideration, and sold a 6.7% ownership interest to Strabag, oneinformation available as of the construction contractors. Through its 67% ownership interest in AES Gener, the Company now has an effective 62% indirect economic interest in Alto Maipo. Additionally, certain construction milestones were amended and if Alto Maipo is unable to meet these milestones, there could be a material impact to the financing and value of the project. For additional information on risks regarding construction and development, refer to Item 1A.—Risk FactorsOur Business is Subject to Substantial Development Uncertainties of this Form 10-K.
Following the restructuring, the project continued to face construction difficulties, including greater than expected costs and slower than anticipated productivity by construction contractors towards agreed-upon


milestones. As a result of the failure to perform by one of its construction contractors, Constructora Nuevo Maipo S.A. (“CNM”), Alto Maipo terminated CNM’s contract during the second quarter of 2017. As a result of the termination of CNM, Alto Maipo’s construction debt of $618 million and derivative liabilities of $132 million are in technical default and presented as current on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
Alto Maipo is currently a party to arbitration concerning the termination of CNM and other related matters. These include Alto Maipo’s draws on letters of credit securing CNM’s performance under the parties’ construction contract totaling $73 million (the “LC Funds”). The LC Funds were collected by Alto Maipo and are available to be utilized for on-going construction costs. In February 2018, CNM was denied their request for interim relief to recover the LC Funds. However, the overall arbitration concerning the termination of CNM, including a final ruling on CNM’s claim to recover the LC Funds, is still pending. Alto Maipo cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the arbitration or any related proceedings. For more information on the legal proceedings concerning CNM, see Item 3.—Legal Proceedingsof this Form 10-K.
Construction at the project is continuing, and the project is over 61% complete. In February 2018, Alto Maipo signed an amended EPC contract with Strabag, the permanent replacement contractor selected to complete CNM’s work, subject to approval by the project's senior lenders as part of the second refinancing. Alto Maipo is working to resolve the challenges described above, however, there can be no assurance that Alto Maipo will succeed in these efforts and if there are further delays or cost overruns, or if Alto Maipo is unable to reach an agreement with the non-recourse lenders, there is a risk these lenders may seek to exercise remedies available as a result of the default noted above, or Alto Maipo may not be able to meet its contractual or other obligations and may be unable to continue with the project. If any of the above occur, there could be a material impairment for the Company.
The carrying value of long-lived assets and deferred tax assets of Alto Maipo as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.4 billion and $60 million, respectively. Through its 67% ownership interest in AES Gener, the Parent Company has invested approximately $375 million in Alto Maipo and has an additional equity funding commitment of $39 million required as part of the March 2017 restructuring described above. AES Gener may provide material additional funding commitments as part of ongoing negotiations and future project restructurings. Even though certain construction difficulties have not been formally resolved, construction costs continue to be capitalized asfiling date, management believes the project is probable of completion. Management believes the carrying value of theour long-lived asset group is recoverable and was not impaired asassets at Maritza of December 31, 2017. In addition, management believes it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized; however, they could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are decreased.
Changuinola Tunnel Leak
Increased water levels were noted in a creek near the Changuinola power plant, a 223 MW hydroelectric power facility in Panama. After the completion of an assessment, the Company has confirmed loss of water in specific sections of the tunnel. The plant is in operation and can generate up to its maximum capacity. Repairs will be needed to ensure the long term performance of the facility, during which time the affected units of the plant will be out of service. Subject to final inspection, the repairs may take up to 10 months to complete and are expected to commence during the first quarter of 2019. The Company has notified its insurers of a potential claim and has asserted claims against its construction contractor. However, there can be no assurance of collection. The Company continues to monitor the situation to identify any potential changes to the tunnel. The Company has not identified any indicators of impairment and believes the carrying value of the long-lived asset groupapproximately $1.1 billion is recoverable as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Tietê GSF Settlement — In September 2020, Law 14.052/2020 published by ANEEL was approved by the President of Brazil, establishing terms for compensation to MRE hydro generators for the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 to 2018, which resulted in higher charges assessed to MRE hydro generators by the regulator. Under this law, compensation will be in the form of an offer for a concession extension for each hydro generator, in exchange for full payment of billed GSF trade payables. In December 2020, ANEEL published a regulation establishing the terms and conditions for potential compensation to Tietê in the form of a concession extension period of approximately 2.6 years. As a result, the previously recognized contingent liabilities related to GSF payments were updated to reflect the Company's best estimate for the fair value of compensation to be received from the concession extension offered in conjunction with the regulation. This compensation was estimated to have a fair value of $184 million, and was recorded as a reversal of Non-Regulated Cost of Sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The concession extension also met the criteria for recognition as a definite-lived intangible asset that will be amortized from the date of the agreement, which is expected in the first quarter of 2021, until the end of the new concession period. The value of the concession extension is based on a preliminary time-value equivalent calculation made by the CCEE and subsequent adjustments requested by Tietê. Both the concession extension period and its equivalent asset value are subject to agreement between ANEEL and AES.


100 | 2020 Annual Report

Management does not expect the agreement to result in a materially different concession extension period or equivalent asset value, however the final compensation value and extension period could differ from the original estimates as of December 31, 2020, which could require adjustments.
Foreign Exchange Rates
We operate in multiple countries and as such are subject to volatility in exchange rates at varying degrees at the subsidiary level and between our functional currency, the USD, and currencies of the countries in which we operate. In 2018 and 2019 there was a significant devaluation in the Argentine peso against the USD, which had an impact on our 2018 and 2019 results. Continued material devaluation of the Argentine peso against the USD could have an impact on our future results. The Argentine economy continues to be considered highly inflationary under U.S. GAAP; as such, all of our Argentine businesses are reported using the USD as the functional currency. For additional information, refer to Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Impairments
Long-lived Assets and Equity Affiliates During In August 2020, AES Gener reached an agreement with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence to early terminate two PPAs of the year ended December 31, 2017,Angamos coal-fired plant in Chile. AES Gener also announced its intention to accelerate the retirement of the Ventanas 1 and Ventanas 2 coal-fired plants. Management will no longer be pursuing a contracting strategy for these assets and the plants will primarily be utilized as peaker plants and for grid stability. Due to these developments, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amounts of these asset groups were not recoverable. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $186 million at$781 million.
During the Kazakhstan CHPyear ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized asset and Hydroelectric plants, $175 million at DPL, $121 million at Laurel Mountain, $37 million at Kilroot, and $18 million at other businesses inother-than-temporary impairment expenses of $1.1 billion, inclusive of the PJM market.asset impairment noted above. See Note 19—8—Investments In and Advances To Affiliates and Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for further information. After recognizing these asset impairment expenses, the carrying value of theour investments in equity affiliates and long-lived asset groups, including thoseassets that were assessed and not impaired, excluding Alto Maipo,for impairment in 2020 totaled $1$2.1 billion at December 31, 2017.2020.
Events or changes in circumstances that may necessitate further recoverability tests and potential impairmentimpairments of long-lived assets may include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, unfavorable changes in power prices or fuel costs, increased competition due to additional capacity in the grid, technological advancements, declining trends in demand, evolving industry expectations to transition away from fossil fuel sources for generation, or an expectation that it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life.


Goodwill The Company currently has no reporting units considered to be "at risk."Aconsiders a reporting unit is considered "at risk"at risk of impairment when its fair value isdoes not higher thanexceed its carrying amount by 10%. In 2019, during the annual goodwill impairment test performed as of October 1, the Company determined that the fair value of its Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 3%. Therefore, Gener's $868 million goodwill balance was considered to be "at risk" largely due to the Chilean government's announcement to phase out coal generation by 2040, and a decline in long-term energy prices.
As a result of the long-lived asset impairments at Gener during the third quarter of 2020, the Company determined there was a triggering event requiring a reassessment of goodwill impairment at September 1, 2020. The Company determined the fair value of its Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 13%. Although the fair value exceeds its carrying value by more than 10%, the Company continues to monitor the Gener reporting unit for potential interim goodwill impairment triggering events.
Through 2028, Gener’s plants remain largely contracted, with PPAs expiring between 2029 and 2042. The Company utilized the income approach in deriving the fair value of the Gener reporting unit, which included estimated cash flows based on the estimated useful lives of the underlying generating asset class. These cash flows were discounted using a weighted average cost of capital of 7%, which was determined based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model. See Item 7.—Critical Accounting Policies and EstimatesFair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities and Note 9—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for further information.
While the duration and severity of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unknown, further disruptions in the global market could result in changes to assumptions utilized in the goodwill assessment. Impairments would


101 | 2020 Annual Report

negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and net worth. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K for further information.
The Company monitors its reporting units at risk of Step 1 failure on an ongoing basis. It is possibleimpairment for interim impairment indicators, and believes that the Company may incurestimates and assumptions used in the calculations are reasonable as of December 31, 2020. Should the fair value of any of the Company’s reporting units fall below its carrying amount because of reduced operating performance, market declines, changes in the discount rate, regulatory changes, or other adverse conditions, goodwill impairment charges at any reporting units containing goodwillmay be necessary in future periods if adverse changes in their business or operating environments occur. See Note 8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.periods.
Functional Currency
Argentina — In February 2017, the Argentina Ministry of Energy issued Resolution 19/2017, which established changes to the energy price framework. As a result of this resolution, tariffs are now priced in USD rather than Argentine pesos, and the retention of unpaid amounts and accumulation of receivables with CAMMESA was eliminated. Concurrent with the establishment of the new price framework, AES Argentina issued $300 million of bonds denominated in USD. Given these significant changes in economic facts and circumstances, the Company changed the functional currency of the Argentina businesses from the Argentine peso to the USD effective February 2017. Changes to the energy framework could have a material impact on the Company.
Chivor — In May 2017, the Company repaid its outstanding USD denominated debt held at Chivor. In addition, the Company updated Chivor’s future financing strategy to align with Colombian peso denominated operational cash flows of the business. Given these changes, the Colombian peso is now regarded as the currency of the economic environment in which Chivor primarily operates. Therefore, the Company changed the functional currency of the Chivor business from USD to the Colombian peso effective May 2017.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Overview
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $949 million,$1.1 billion, of which $11$71 million was held at the Parent Company and qualified holding companies. The Company also had $424$335 million in short termshort-term investments, held primarily at subsidiaries. In addition, we hadsubsidiaries, and restricted cash and debt service reserves of $839$738 million. The Company also had non-recourse and recourse aggregate principal amounts of debt outstanding of $15.3$16.4 billion and $4.6$3.4 billion, respectively. Of the approximately $2.2$1.4 billion of our current non-recourse debt, $1.1$1.2 billion was presented as such because it is due in the next twelve months and $1 billion$276 million relates to debt considered in default due to covenant violations. Defaults at AES Puerto Rico are covenant and payment defaults, for which Forbearance and Standstill Agreements have been signed. All otherNone of the defaults are not payment defaults but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants and/or other conditions such as (but not limited to) failure to meet information covenants, complete construction or other milestones in an allocated time, meet certain minimum or maximum financial ratios, or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents, of which $269 million is due to the Company.bankruptcy of the offtaker.
We expect such current maturities willof non-recourse debt to be repaid from net cash provided by operating activities of the subsidiary to which the debt relates, or through opportunistic refinancing activity, or some combination thereof. We have $5$1 million of recourse debt which matures within the next twelve months. From time to time, we may elect to repurchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise when management believes that such securities are attractively priced. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, and other factors. The amounts involved in any such repurchases may be material.
We rely mainly on long-term debt obligations to fund our construction activities. We have, to the extent available at acceptable terms, utilized non-recourse debt to fund a significant portion of the capital expenditures and investments required to construct and acquire our electric power plants, distribution companies, and related assets. Our non-recourse financing is designed to limit cross defaultcross-default risk to the Parent Company or other subsidiaries and affiliates. Our non-recourse long-term debt is a combination of fixed and variable interest rate instruments. Generally, a portion or all of the variable rate debt is fixed through the use of interest rate swaps. In addition, the debtDebt is typically denominated in the currency that matches the currency of the revenue expected to be generated from the benefiting project, thereby reducing currency risk. In certain cases, the currency is matched through the use of derivative instruments. The majority of our non-recourse debt is funded by international commercial banks, with debt capacity supplemented by multilaterals and local regional banks.
Given our long-term debt obligations, the Company is subject to interest rate risk on debt balances that accrue interest at variable rates. When possible, the Company will borrow funds at fixed interest rates or hedge its variable rate debt to fix its interest costs on such obligations. In addition, the Company has historically tried to maintain at least 70% of its consolidated long-term obligations at fixed interest rates, including fixing the interest rate through the use of interest rate swaps. These efforts apply to the notional amount of the swaps compared to the amount of


related underlying debt. Presently, the Parent Company's only material unhedged exposure to variable interest rate debt relates to indebtedness under its $521 million outstanding secured term loan due 2022 and drawings of $207$70 million under its securedrevolving credit facility. On a consolidated basis, of the Company's $20$20.2 billion of total gross debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017,2020, approximately $3.2$2.7 billion bore interest at variable rates that were not subject to a derivative instrument which fixed the interest rate. Brazil holds $1 billion$800 million of our floating rate non-recourse exposure as we have no ability to fix local debt interest rates efficiently.
In addition to utilizing non-recourse debt at a subsidiary level when available, the Parent Company provides a portion, or in certain instances all, of the remaining long-term financing or credit required to fund development, construction or acquisition of a particular project. These investments have generally taken the form of equity investments or intercompany loans, which are subordinated to the project's non-recourse loans. We generally obtain the funds for these investments from our cash flows from operations, proceeds from the sales of assets and/or the proceeds from our issuances of debt, common stock and other securities. Similarly, in certain of our businesses, the Parent Company may provide financial guarantees or other credit support for the benefit of counterparties who have entered into contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity, equipment, or other services with our subsidiaries or


102 | 2020 Annual Report

lenders. In such circumstances, if a business defaults on its payment or supply obligation, the Parent Company will be responsible for the business' obligations up to the amount provided for in the relevant guarantee or other credit support. AtAs of December 31, 2017,2020, the Parent Company had provided outstanding financial and performance-related guarantees or other credit support commitments to or for the benefit of our businesses, which were limited by the terms of the agreements, of approximately $842 million$1.4 billion in aggregate (excluding those collateralized by letters of credit and other obligations discussed below).
As a result of the Parent Company's below investment gradesplit rating, some counterparties may be unwilling to accept our general unsecured commitments to provide credit support. Accordingly, with respect to both new and existing commitments, the Parent Company may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit, to backstop or replace our credit support. The Parent Company may not be able to provide adequate assurances to such counterparties. To the extent we are required and able to provide letters of credit or other collateral to such counterparties, this will reduce the amount of credit available to us to meet our other liquidity needs. AtAs of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $36 million in letters of credit outstanding, provided under our senior secured credit facility, $52$110 million in letters of credit outstanding provided under our unsecured seniorcredit facilities, and $77 million in letters of credit outstanding provided under our revolving credit facility. These letters of credit operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and business operations. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 0.25%1% to 2.25%3% per annum on the outstanding amounts.
We expect to continue to seek, where possible, non-recourse debt financing in connection with the assets or businesses that we or our affiliates may develop, construct or acquire. However, depending on local and global market conditions and the unique characteristics of individual businesses, non-recourse debt may not be available on economically attractive terms or at all. If we decide not to provide any additional funding or credit support to a subsidiary project that is under construction or has near-term debt payment obligations and that subsidiary is unable to obtain additional non-recourse debt, such subsidiary may become insolvent, and we may lose our investment in that subsidiary. Additionally, if any of our subsidiaries lose a significant customer, the subsidiary may need to withdraw from a project or restructure the non-recourse debt financing. If we or the subsidiary choose not to proceed with a project or are unable to successfully complete a restructuring of the non-recourse debt, we may lose our investment in that subsidiary.
Many of our subsidiaries depend on timely and continued access to capital markets to manage their liquidity needs. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms, to refinance existing indebtedness or to fund operations and other commitments during times of political or economic uncertainty may have material adverse effects on the financial condition and results of operations of those subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the timing of tariff increases or delays in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions could affect the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses.
Long-Term Receivables
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had approximately $194$110 million of gross accounts receivable classified as Noncurrent assets—other primarily related to certain of its generation businesses in Argentina. TheOther noncurrent assets. These noncurrent receivables mostly consist of accounts receivable in Argentina and Chile that, pursuant to amended agreements or government resolutions, have collection periods that extend beyond December 31, 2018,2021, or one year from the latest balance sheet date. The majority of ArgentinianArgentine receivables have been converted into long-term financing for the construction of power plants. Noncurrent receivables in Chile pertain primarily to revenues recognized on regulated energy contracts that were impacted by the Stabilization Fund created by the Chilean government. A portion relates to the extension of existing PPAs with the addition of renewable energy. See Note 6—7—Financing Receivables included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 1.—Business—South America SBU—Argentina—Regulatory Framework and Market Structure, and Item 1.7.Business—Regulatory Matters—ArgentinaManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Chile of this Form 10-K for further information.


As of December 31, 2020, the Company had approximately $1.3 billion of loans receivable primarily related to a facility constructed under a BOT contract in Vietnam. This loan receivable represents contract consideration related to the construction of the facility, which was substantially completed in 2015, and will be collected over the 25-year term of the plant's PPA. As of December 31, 2020, Mong Duong met the held-for-sale criteria and the loan receivable balance of $1.3 billion, net of CECL reserve of $32 million, was reclassified to held-for-sale assets. Of the loan receivable balance, $80 million was classified as Current held-for-sale assets and $1.2 billion was classified as Noncurrent held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 20—Revenueincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for further information.


103 | 2020 Annual Report

Cash Sources and Uses
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 2020 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, sales of short-term investments, and sales to noncontrolling interests. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 2020 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, and purchases of short-term investments.
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 2019 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, and sales of short-term investments. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 2019 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, and purchases of short-term investments.
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 2018 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from the sales of business interests, and sales of short-term investments. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 2018 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, and purchases of short-term investments.
A summary of cash-based activities are as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
Cash Sources:202020192018
Issuance of non-recourse debt$4,680 $5,828 $1,928 
Issuance of recourse debt3,419 — 1,000 
Net cash provided by operating activities2,755 2,466 2,343 
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities2,420 2,026 1,865 
Sale of short-term investments627 666 1,302 
Sales to noncontrolling interests553 128 95 
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold169 178 2,020 
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries112 — — 
Insurance proceeds150 17 
Other— 123 
Total Cash Sources$14,744 $11,451 $10,693 
Cash Uses:
Repayments of non-recourse debt$(4,136)$(4,831)$(1,411)
Repayments of recourse debt(3,366)(450)(1,933)
Repayments under the revolving credit facilities(2,479)(1,735)(2,238)
Capital expenditures(1,900)(2,405)(2,121)
Purchase of short-term investments(653)(770)(1,411)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(422)(427)(340)
Dividends paid on AES common stock(381)(362)(344)
Contributions and loans to equity affiliates(332)(324)(145)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests(259)— — 
Acquisitions of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash acquired(136)(192)(66)
Payments for financing fees(107)(126)(39)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(60)(146)(275)
Other(258)(114)(155)
Total Cash Uses$(14,489)$(11,882)$(10,478)
Net increase (decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash$255 $(431)$215 
Consolidated Cash Flows
The following table reflects the changes in operating, investing, and financing cash flows for the comparative twelve month periods (in millions):
December 31,$ Change
Cash flows provided by (used in):2020201920182020 vs. 20192019 vs. 2018
Operating activities$2,755 $2,466 $2,343 $289 $123 
Investing activities(2,295)(2,721)(505)426 (2,216)
Financing activities(78)(86)(1,643)1,557 

  December 31, $ Change
Cash flows provided by (used in): 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Operating activities $2,489
 $2,884
 $2,134
 $(395) $750
Investing activities (2,749) (2,108) (2,366) (641) 258
Financing activities 43
 (747) 28
 790
 (775)

104 | 2020 Annual Report

Operating Activities
The following table summarizes the key components of our consolidated operating cash flows (in millions):
  December 31, $ Change
  2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Net income (loss) $(777) $(777) $762
 $
 $(1,539)
Depreciation and amortization 1,169
 1,176
 1,144
 (7) 32
Impairment expenses 537
 1,098
 602
 (561) 496
Loss on the extinguishment of debt 68
 20
 186
 48
 (166)
Deferred income taxes 672
 (793) (50) 1,465
 (743)
Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses 611
 1,383
 
 (772) 1,383
Other adjustments to net income 275
 225
 (73) 50
 298
Non-cash adjustments to net income (loss) 3,332
 3,109
 1,809
 223
 1,300
Net income, adjusted for non-cash items $2,555
 $2,332
 $2,571
 $223
 $(239)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities (1)
 (66) 552
 (437) (618) 989
Net cash provided by operating activities (2)
 $2,489
 $2,884
 $2,134
 $(395) $750
_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the table below for explanations of the variance in operating assets and liabilities.
(2)
Amounts included in the table above include the results of discontinued operations, where applicable.
Fiscal Year 20172020 versus 20162019
Net change incash provided by operating assets and liabilities decreased by $618activities increased $289 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, which was primarily driven by (in2019.
Operating Cash Flows (1)
(in millions):
aes-20201231_g22.jpg
Increases in: 
Accounts receivable, primarily at Maritza and Eletropaulo$(414)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, primarily short-term regulatory assets at Eletropaulo and Sul(763)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities, primarily at Eletropaulo, Tietê, Gener and Maritza, partially offset by Corporate783
Income taxes payable, net, and other taxes payable, primarily at Gener, Tietê and Eletropaulo252
Decreases in: 
Other liabilities, primarily due to higher deferrals into regulatory liabilities related to energy costs in 2016 compared to 2017 at Eletropaulo(362)
Other(114)
Total decrease in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities$(618)
(1)Amounts included in the chart above include the results of discontinued operations, where applicable.
Fiscal Year 2016 versus 2015(2)The change in adjusted net income is defined as the variance in net income, net of the total adjustments to net income as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
Net(3)The change in working capital is defined as the variance in total changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
Adjusted net income decreased $40 million, primarily due to lower margins at our US and Utilities SBU and prior year gains on insurance proceeds associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018 and the Changuinola tunnel leak, partially offset by higher margins at our South America and MCAC SBUs.
Working capital requirements decreased $329 million, primarily due to an increase in deferred income at Angamos as a result of the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence.
Fiscal Year 2019 versus 2018
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $989$123 million for the year ended December 31, 20162019, compared to December 31, 2018.
Operating Cash Flows (1)
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g23.jpg
(1)Amounts included in the chart above include the results of discontinued operations, where applicable.
(2)The change in adjusted net income is defined as the variance in net income, net of the total adjustments to net income as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
(3)The change in working capital is defined as the variance in total changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.


105 | 2020 Annual Report

Adjusted net income decreased $24 million, primarily due to lower margins at our South America and MCAC SBUs. These impacts were partially offset by the gains on insurance recoveries in 2019 associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018 and the Changuinola tunnel leak, and higher margins at our US and Utilities SBU.
Working capital requirements decreased $147 million, primarily due to higher collections of overdue receivables from distribution companies in the Dominican Republic, higher collections of insurance receivables at Andres, and lower supplier payments and VAT recoveries at Gener. These impacts were partially offset by a decrease in income tax liabilities at Argentina as a result of lower operating margin and income tax rates, and higher supplier payments and collections at Puerto Rico in 2018.
Investing Activities
Fiscal Year 2020 versus 2019
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $426 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was2020 compared to December 31, 2019.
Investing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g24.jpg
Cash from short-term investing activities increased $78 million, primarily at Tietê as a result of lower net short-term investment purchases in 2020.
Insurance proceeds decreased $141 million, largely due to prior year insurance proceeds associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018 and the Changuinola tunnel leak.
Capital expenditures decreased $505 million, discussed further below.


106 | 2020 Annual Report

Capital Expenditures
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g25.jpg
Growth expenditures decreased $356 million, primarily driven by (in millions):the timing of payments for the Southland repowering project, renewable energy projects in Argentina, and a pipeline project at Andres, as well as the completion of solar projects at AES Brasil, a wind project in Hawaii, and the Colon LNG facility in Panama. This impact was partially offset by higher investments at IPALCO and in renewable projects at Gener.
Maintenance expenditures decreased $143 million, primarily due to prior year expenditures at Andres as a result of the steam turbine lightning damage and in Panama as a result of the Changuinola tunnel lining upgrade, as well as due to the timing of payments in the prior year at IPALCO.
Decreases in: 
Other assets, primarily long-term regulatory assets at Eletropaulo and service concession assets at Vietnam$1,054
Accounts receivable, primarily at Maritza and Eletropaulo615
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, primarily regulatory assets at Eletropaulo and Sul215
Accounts payable and other current liabilities, primarily at Eletropaulo and Sul(651)
Income taxes payable, net and other taxes payable, primarily at Tietê, Chivor and Gener(252)
Increases in: 
Other8
Total increase in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities$989


Investing ActivitiesEnvironmental expenditures decreased $6 million, primarily due to the timing of payments in the prior year related to projects at Gener.
Fiscal Year 20172019 versus 20162018
Net cash used in investing activities increased $641 million$2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to December 31, 2016, which was2018.
Investing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g26.jpg
Proceeds from dispositions decreased $1.8 billion, primarily drivendue to sales of Masinloc, Electrica Santiago, CTNG, Eletropaulo, and the DPL peaker assets in 2018; partially offset by (in millions):the sale of a portion of our interest in a portfolio of sPower’s operating assets and the sale of the Kilroot and Ballylumford plants in the United Kingdom in 2019.
Contributions and loans to equity affiliates increased by $179 million, primarily due to project funding requirements at sPower.
Capital expenditures increased $284 million, discussed further below.


Increases in: 
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, and equity method investees (related to the acquisitions of sPower and Alto Sertão II in 2017, partially offset by the lower acquisition of Distributed Energy projects in 2016)$(570)
Contributions to equity investments at OPGC and sPower(83)
Restricted cash, debt service and other assets(74)
Decreases in: 
Proceeds from the sale of business, net of cash sold, related to the sale of Sul in 2016, partially offset by the sale of Zimmer and Miami Fort(523)
Short-term investments477
Capital expenditures (1)
168
Other investing activities(36)
Total increase in net cash used in investing activities$(641)
_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the tables below for a breakout of capital expenditure by type and by primary business driver.107 | 2020 Annual Report
The following table summarizes the Company's capital
Capital Expenditures
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g27.jpg
Growth expenditures for growthincreased $130 million, primarily due to higher investments maintenancein solar projects at Distributed Energy and environmental reportedrenewable energy projects in investing cash activitiesArgentina, partially offset by a decrease in payments for the periods indicated (in millions):Southland repowering projects.
Maintenance expenditures increased $173 million, primarily at Andres as a result of the steam turbine lightning damage, at DPL from storm damages, and at Changuinola due to the upgrade of the tunnel lining.
  December 31, $ Change
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Growth Investments $(1,549) $(1,510) $(39)
Maintenance (552) (617) 65
Environmental (1)
 (76) (218) 142
Total capital expenditures $(2,177) $(2,345) $168
_____________________________
(1)
Includes both recoverable and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures. See SBU Performance Analysis for more information.
Cash used for capitalEnvironmental expenditures decreased by $168$19 million, primarily at IPALCO due to lower spending for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, which was primarily driven by (in millions):NAAQS, NPDES, and CCR rule compliance.
Decreases in: 
Growth expenditures at the Andes SBU, primarily due to the completion of the Cochrane project and slower than anticipated productivity by construction contractors at Alto Maipo$114
Growth expenditure at the Eurasia SBU, primarily due to timing of payments resulting in more financed capex73
Maintenance and environmental expenditures at the US SBU, primarily due to lower spending at IPALCO on the NPDES and MATS compliance and Harding Street refueling projects, decreased spending on CCR compliance and also, decreased spending at DPL on Stuart and Killen facilities due to planned plant closures180
Increases in:

Growth expenditures at the US SBU, primarily due to increased spending at Southland re-powering and various Distributed Energy projects, offset by lower spending related to Eagle Valley at IPALCO(233)
Other capital expenditures34
Total decrease in net cash used for capital expenditures$168
Fiscal Year 2016 versus 2015
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $258 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015, which was primarily driven by (in millions):
Increases in: 
Capital expenditures (1)
$(37)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (primarily Distributed Energy)(38)
Proceeds from the sales of businesses, net of cash sold (primarily related to sales of DPLER and Sul)493
Net purchases of short-term investments(297)
Decreases in: 
Restricted cash, debt service and other assets98
Other investing activities39
Total decrease in net cash used in investing activities$258
_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the tables below for a breakout of capital expenditures by type and by primary business driver.


The following table summarizes the Company's capital expenditures for growth investments, maintenance and environmental for the periods indicated (in millions):
  December 31, $ Change
  2016 2015 2016 vs. 2015
Growth Investments $(1,510) $(1,401) $(109)
Maintenance (617) (606) (11)
Environmental (1)
 (218) (301) 83
Total capital expenditures $(2,345) $(2,308) $(37)
_____________________________
(1)
Includes both recoverable and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures.
Cash used for capital expenditures increased by $37 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015, which was primarily driven by (in millions):
Increases in: 
Growth expenditures at the Eurasia SBU for the construction of the Masinloc expansion and retrofit related costs to the existing plant to increasing capacity$(124)
Growth expenditures at the MCAC SBU for the construction of Colon and Los Mina(266)
Decreases In: 
Growth expenditures at the Andes SBU, primarily due to lower spending at Cochrane and the Andes Solar plant; partially offset by higher investments in Alto Maipo280
Growth expenditures at the US SBU, primarily due to lower spending related to Eagle Valley and Transmission & Distribution projects at IPALCO20
Maintenance and environmental expenditures at the US SBU, primarily due to lower spending related to MATS compliance and the conversion of Harding Street Stations 5, 6 and 7 to natural gas upon being placed into service in late 2015 and early 2016; partially offset by higher spending on CCR compliance63
Other capital expenditures(10)
Total increase in net cash used for capital expenditures$(37)
Financing Activities
Fiscal Year 2020 versus 2019
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $790$8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020 compared to December 31, 2016, which was2019.
Financing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g28.jpg
See Notes 11—Debtand 17—Equityin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant debt and equity transactions, respectively.
The $503 million impact from recourse debt transactions is primarily driven by (in millions):due to higher net borrowings at the Parent Company.
The $425 million impact from sales to noncontrolling interests is primarily due to the proceeds received from the sale of a 35% ownership interest in Southland Energy.
The $112 million impact from issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries is due to proceeds from the issuance of preferred shares to minority interests of Cochrane.


Decreases in: 
Proceeds from the sale of redeemable stock of subsidiaries at IPALCO$(134)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests and redeemable security holders at MCAC and US SBUs(117)
Repayment of non-recourse debt, primarily at the Brazil, US, Eurasia and MCAC SBUs (1)
550
Increases in: 
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities, primarily at the Parent Company and net decrease in repayments at the US SBU382
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interests primarily related to the sell down of Dominican Republic business in 201794
Other financing activities15
Total decrease in net cash used in financing activities$790
_____________________________
(1)
See Note 10—Debtin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant recourse debt transactions.
108 | 2020 Annual Report

The $453 million impact from non-recourse debt transactions is primarily due to lower net borrowings at Southland and Gener, partially offset by a decrease in net repayments at AES Brasil and DPL and higher net borrowings at Distributed Energy, Panama, and Vietnam.
The $290 million impact from Parent Company revolver transactions is primarily due to higher net repayments in the current year.
The $259 million impact from acquisitions of noncontrolling interests is primarily due to the acquisition of an additional 19.8% ownership interest in AES Brasil.
Fiscal Year 2019 versus 2018
Net cash provided byused in financing activities increased $775 milliondecreased $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, which was2018.
Financing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20201231_g29.jpg
See Note 11—Debtin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant debt transactions.
The $483 million impact from recourse debt activity is primarily driven by (in millions):
Increases in: 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, primarily at the Brazil SBU$(150)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests, primarily at the MCAC SBU64
Decreases in: 
Net issuance of non-recourse debt, primarily at the Andes and Brazil SBUs(624)
Proceeds from the sale of redeemable stock of subsidiaries at IPALCO(327)
Proceeds from sales to noncontrolling interests, net of transaction costs(154)
Purchases of treasury stock by the Parent Company403
Net repayments of recourse debt at the Parent Company (1)
32
Other financing activities(19)
Total increase in net cash provided by financing activities$(775)
_____________________________
(1)
See Note 10—Debt in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant recourse debt transactions.
Parent Company Liquidity
The following discussiondue to higher net repayments of Parent Company debt in 2018.
The $480 million impact from non-recourse debt transactions is primarily due to net issuances at Gener, Alto Maipo and DPL, which were partially offset by net repayments at AES Brasil, and lower net issuances in 2018 at IPALCO.
The $387 million impact from Parent Company revolver transactions is primarily from higher repayments in 2018, and higher borrowings in 2019 for general corporate cash management activities.
The $278 million impact from non-recourse revolver transactions is primarily due to higher net borrowings at DPL and net repayments at IPALCO in 2018.
Parent Company Liquidity
The following discussion is included as a useful measure of the liquidity available to The AES Corporation, or the Parent Company, given the non-recourse nature of most of our indebtedness. Parent Company Liquidity as outlined below is a non-GAAP measure and should not be construed as an alternative


to cashCash and cash equivalents, which is determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents is disclosed on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.GAAP. Parent Company Liquidity may differ from similarly titled measures used by other companies. The principal sources of liquidity at the Parent Company level are dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries, including refinancing proceeds, proceeds from debt and equity financings at the Parent Company level, including availability under our revolving credit facility, and proceeds from asset sales. Cash requirements at the Parent Company level are primarily to fund interest;interest and principal repayments of debt;debt, construction commitments;commitments, other equity commitments;commitments, common stock repurchases; acquisitions; taxes;repurchases, acquisitions, taxes, Parent Company overhead and development costs;costs, and dividends on common stock.


109 | 2020 Annual Report

The Company defines Parent Company Liquidity as cash available to the Parent Company, including cash at qualified holding companies, plus available borrowings under our existing credit facility. The cash held at qualified holding companies represents cash sent to subsidiaries of the Company domiciled outside of the U.S. Such subsidiaries have no contractual restrictions on their ability to send cash to the Parent Company. Parent Company Liquidity is reconciled to its most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, Cash and cash equivalents, at December 31, 2017 and 2016the periods indicated as follows:follows (in millions):
Parent Company Liquidity (in millions)
 2017 2016
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents $949
 $1,244
Less: Cash and cash equivalents at subsidiaries 938
 1,144
Parent and qualified holding companies' cash and cash equivalents 11
 100
Commitments under Parent Company credit facilities 1,100
 800
Less: Letters of credit under the credit facilities (35) (6)
Less: Borrowings under the credit facilities (207) 
Borrowings available under Parent Company credit facilities 858
 794
Total Parent Company Liquidity $869
 $894
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents$1,089 $1,029 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents at subsidiaries(1,018)(1,016)
Parent Company and qualified holding companies' cash and cash equivalents71 13 
Commitments under the Parent Company credit facility1,000 1,000 
Less: Letters of credit under the credit facility(77)(19)
Less: Borrowings under the credit facility(70)(180)
Borrowings available under the Parent Company credit facility853 801 
Total Parent Company Liquidity$924 $814 
The Parent Company paid dividends of $0.48$0.57 per outstanding share to its common stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. While we intend to continue payment of dividends and believe we will have sufficient liquidity to do so, we can provide no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends, or if continued, the amount of such dividends.
Recourse Debt
Our total recourse debt was $4.6 billion and $4.7$3.4 billion at December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.2019. See Note 10—11—Debt in Item 8.—FinancialFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional detail.
While weWe believe that our sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future, thisfuture. This belief is based on a number of material assumptions, including, without limitation, assumptions about our ability to access the capital markets, (see Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political), the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, currency exchange rates, power market pool prices, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends. In addition, our subsidiaries' ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us (at the Parent Company level) is subject to certain limitations contained in loans, governmental provisions and other agreements. We can provide no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that the actual cash requirements will not be greater than anticipated. We have met our interim needs for shorter-term and working capital financing at the Parent Company level with our revolving credit facility. See Item 1A.—Risk FactorsThe AES Corporation is a holding company and itsCorporation's ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness including its public debt securities, is dependent upon the receipt of funds from itsour subsidiaries, by way of dividends, fees, interest, loans or otherwise, of this Form 10-K.
Various debt instruments at the Parent Company level, including our senior securedrevolving credit facility, contain certain restrictive covenants. The covenants provide for, among other items, limitations on other indebtedness; liens, investments and guarantees; limitations on dividends, stock repurchases and other equity transactions; restrictions and limitations on mergers and acquisitions, sales of assets, leases, transactions with affiliates and off-balance sheet and derivative arrangements; maintenance of certain financial ratios; and financial and other reporting requirements. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we were in compliance with these covenants at the Parent Company level.
Non-Recourse Debt
While the lenders under our non-recourse debt financings generally do not have direct recourse to the Parent Company, defaults thereunder can still have important consequences for our results of operations and liquidity, including, without limitation:
reducing our cash flows as the subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to the Parent Company during the time period of any default;


triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;
causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets; and
triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the Parent Company.
For example, our senior securedrevolving credit facility and outstanding debt securities at the Parent Company include events of default for certain bankruptcy relatedbankruptcy-related events involving material subsidiaries. In addition, our revolving credit agreement at the Parent Company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries.


110 | 2020 Annual Report

Some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts to $2.2$1.4 billion. The portion of current debt related to such defaults was $1 billion$276 million at December 31, 2017,2020, all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries — Alto Maipo, AES Puerto Rico, AES Ilumina, and AES Ilumina.Jordan Solar. None of the defaults are payment defaults, but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants or other conditions contained in the non-recourse debt documents, of which $269 million is due to the bankruptcy of the offtaker. See Note 10—11—Debt in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional detail.
None of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under AES' corporatethe Parent Company's debt agreements as of December 31, 20172020, in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under AES'the Parent Company's indebtedness. However, as a result of additional dispositions of assets, other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary, it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a "material subsidiary" and thereby upon an acceleration trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the Parent Company's outstanding debt securities. A material subsidiary is defined in the Parent Company's senior secured revolving credit facility as any business that contributed 20% or more of the Parent Company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2017,2020, none of the defaults listed above, individually or in the aggregate, results in or is at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Parent Company.
Contractual Obligations and Parent Company Contingent Contractual Obligations
A summary of our contractual obligations, commitments and other liabilities as of December 31, 20172020 is presented below (in millions):
Contractual ObligationsTotalLess than 1 year1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than 5 yearsOther
Footnote Reference(5)
Debt obligations (1) (2)
$20,163 $1,440 $1,539 $3,280 $13,904 $— 11 
Interest payments on long-term debt (3)
6,422 721 1,340 1,065 3,296 — n/a
Finance lease obligations (2)
157 10 134 — 14 
Operating lease obligations (2)
645 29 57 52 507 — 14 
Electricity obligations7,552 700 947 868 5,037 — 12 
Fuel obligations5,191 1,370 1,424 952 1,445 — 12 
Other purchase obligations6,057 1,904 1,241 1,096 1,816 — 12 
Other long-term liabilities reflected on AES' consolidated balance sheet under GAAP (2) (4)
595 — 332 11 243 n/a
Total$46,782 $6,169 $6,890 $7,332 $26,382 $
_____________________________
(1)Includes recourse and excludesnon-recourse debt presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These amounts exclude finance lease liabilities which are included in the finance lease category.
(2)Excludes any businesses classified as discontinued operationsheld-for-sale. See Note 25—Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for additional information related to held-for-sale businesses.
(3)Interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at December 31, 2020 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing, early redemptions or held-for-sale (in millions):new debt issuances. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2020.
(4)These amounts do not include current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations. Noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "Other" column of the table above as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments. In addition, these amounts do not include: (1) regulatory liabilities (See Note 10—Regulatory Assets and Liabilities), (2) contingencies (See Note 13—Contingencies), (3) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities (see Note 15—Benefit Plans), (4) derivatives and incentive compensation (See Note 6—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) or (5) any taxes (See Note 23—Income Taxes) except for uncertain tax obligations, as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments. See the indicated notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the items excluded.
(5)For further information see the note referenced below in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.


Contractual ObligationsTotal Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years Other 
Footnote Reference(4)
Debt Obligations (1)
$20,404
 $2,250
 $2,431
 $5,003
 $10,720
 $
 10
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt (2)
9,103
 1,172
 2,166
 1,719
 4,046
 
 n/a
Capital Lease Obligations18
 2
 2
 2
 12
 
 11
Operating Lease Obligations935
 58
 116
 117
 644
 
 11
Electricity Obligations4,501
 581
 948
 907
 2,065
 
 11
Fuel Obligations5,859
 1,759
 1,642
 992
 1,466
 
 11
Other Purchase Obligations4,984
 1,488
 1,401
 781
 1,314
 
 11
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on AES' Consolidated Balance Sheet under GAAP (3)
701
 
 284
 118
 277
 22
 n/a
Total$46,505
 $7,310
 $8,990
 $9,639
 $20,544
 $22
  
_____________________________
(1)
Includes recourse and non-recourse debt presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These amounts exclude capital lease obligations which are included in the capital lease category.111 | 2020 Annual Report
(2)
Interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at December 31, 2017 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing, early redemptions or new debt issuances. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2017.
(3)
These amounts do not include current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations. Noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "Other" column of the table above as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments. In addition, these amounts do not include: (1) regulatory liabilities (See Note 9—Regulatory Assets and Liabilities), (2) contingencies (See Note 12—Contingencies), (3) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities (see Note 13—Benefit Plans), (4) derivatives and incentive compensation (See Note 5—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) or (5) any taxes (See Note 20—Income Taxes) except for uncertain tax obligations, as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments. See the indicated notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the items excluded.
(4)
For further information see the note referenced below in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.



The following table presents our Parent Company's contingent contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017:2020:
Contingent contractual obligations Amount (in millions) Number of Agreements Maximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)Contingent contractual obligationsAmount (in millions)Number of AgreementsMaximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)
Guarantees and commitments $815
 21 $1 — 272Guarantees and commitments$1,358 69$0 — 157
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facility 52
 4 $2 — 26
Asset sale related indemnities (1)
 27
 1 27
Letters of credit under the senior secured credit facility 36
 21 <$1 — 13
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facilitiesLetters of credit under the unsecured credit facilities110 25$0 — 56
Letters of credit under the revolving credit facilityLetters of credit under the revolving credit facility77 17$0 — 62
Surety bondSurety bond1$1
Total $930
 47 Total$1,546 112
_____________________________
(1)
(1)     Excludes normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
Excludes normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
We have a diverse portfolio of performance-related contingent contractual obligations. These obligations are designed to cover potential risks and only require payment if certain targets are not met or certain contingencies occur. The risks associated with these obligations include change of control, construction cost overruns, subsidiary default, political risk, tax indemnities, spot market power prices, sponsor support and liquidated damages under power sales agreements for projects in development, in operation and under construction. In addition, we have an asset sale program through which we may have customary indemnity obligations under certain assets sale agreements. While we do not expect that we will be required to fund any material amounts under these contingent contractual obligations beyond 2017,2020, many of the events which would give rise to such obligations are beyond our control. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to fund our obligations under these contingent contractual obligations if we are required to make substantial payments thereunder.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Consolidated Financial Statements of AES are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. AES' significant accounting policies are described in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
An accounting estimate is considered critical if the estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the estimate was made, different estimates reasonably could have been used, or the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
Management believes that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results could materially differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods. Management has discussed these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee, as appropriate. Listed below are the Company's most significant critical accounting estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes— We are subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our worldwide income tax provision requires significant judgment and is based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. Certain of the Company's subsidiaries are under examination by relevant taxing authorities for various tax years. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each tax jurisdiction when determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. Accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a more likely than not recognition threshold. Tax reserves have been established, which the Company believes to be adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. Once established, reserves are adjusted only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change to the reserves. While the Company believes that the amounts of the tax estimates are reasonable, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may be materially different than the reserve amounts.
Because we have a wide range of statutory tax rates in the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate, any changes in our geographical earnings mix could materially impact our effective tax rate. Furthermore, our tax position could be adversely impacted by changes in tax laws, tax treaties or tax regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof and such changes may be more likely or become more likely in view of recent economic trends in certain of the jurisdictions in which we operate. As an example, new tax laws were enacted inDecember 2017 in the U.S. which decreased the statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, required a one-time transition tax, and introduced numerous other changes. As further outlined in Key Trends and Uncertainties, the Company anticipates that the new GILTI provisions of U.S. tax reform could materially impact the effective tax rate in future periods.



112 | 2020 Annual Report


Accordingly, in 2017 our net U.S. deferred tax liabilities were remeasured to the new rates. The potential future impacts of the changes in tax law may be material to continuing operations. See Note 20—Income Taxesto the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
The Company's provision for income taxes could be adversely impacted by changes to the U.S. taxation of earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company has made reasonable estimates of the impacts of U.S. tax reform on its 2017 financial results, subjectand recorded adjustments to potential adjustmentsthose estimates in 2018 as weanalysis was completed. As of December 31, 2018, our analysis of the one-time impacts of the TCJA was complete our analysis. Our expected effectiveunder SAB 118. However, in the first quarter of 2019, the U.S. Treasury Department issued final regulations on the one-time transition tax rate could increase by amounts that may be material towhich included changes from the Company.proposed regulations issued in 2018.
In addition, no taxes have been recorded on undistributed earnings for certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the extent such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Should the earnings be remitted as dividends, the Company may be subject to additional foreign withholding and state income taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of the existing assets and liabilities, and their respective income tax bases. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Sales of Noncontrolling Interests The accounting for a sale of noncontrolling interest under the accounting standards depends on whether the sale is consideredCompany has elected to be a sale of in-substance real estate, where the gain (loss) on sale would be recognized in earnings rather than within stockholders' equity. If management's estimation process determines that there is no significant value beyond the in-substance real estate, the gain (loss) on the sale of the noncontrolling interest is recognized in earnings. However, if it is determined that significant value likely exists beyond the in-substance real estate, the gain (loss) on the sale of the noncontrolling interest would be recognized within stockholders' equity.
In-substance real estate is composed of land plus improvements and integral equipment. The determination of whether property, plant and equipment is integral equipment is based on the significance of the costs to remove the equipment from its existing location (including the cost of repairing damage resulting from the removal), combined with the decreasetreat GILTI as an expense in the fair value of the equipment as a result of those removal activities. When the combined total of removal costs and the decrease in fair value of the equipment exceeds 10% of the fair value of the equipment, the equipment is considered integral equipment. The accounting standards specifically identify power plants as an example of in-substance real estate. Where the consolidated entityperiod in which noncontrolling interests have been sold contains in-substance real estate, management estimates the extenttax is accrued. Accordingly, no deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded related to which the total fair value of the assets of the entity is represented by the in-substance real estate and whether significant value exists beyond the in-substance real estate. This estimation considers all qualitative and quantitative factors relevant for each sale and, where appropriate, includes making quantitative estimates about the fair value of the entity and its identifiable assets and liabilities (including any favorable or unfavorable contracts) by analogy to the accounting standards on business combinations. As such, these estimates may require significant judgment and assumptions, similar to the critical accounting estimates discussed below for impairments and fair value.GILTI.
Impairments— Our accounting policies on goodwill and long-lived assets are described in detail in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company makes considerable judgments in its impairment evaluations of goodwill and long-lived assets, starting with determining if an impairment indicator exists. Events that may result in an impairment analysis being performed include, but are not limited to: adverse changes in the regulatory environment, unfavorable changes in power prices or fuel costs, increased competition due to additional capacity in the grid, technological advancements, declining trends in demand, evolving industry expectations to transition away from fossil fuel sources for generation, or an expectation it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company exercises judgment in determining if these events represent an impairment indicator requiring the computation of the fair value of goodwill and/or the recoverability of long-lived assets. The fair value determination is typically the most judgmental part in an impairment evaluation. Please see Fair Value below for further detail.
As part of the impairment evaluation process, management analyzes the sensitivity of fair value to various underlying assumptions. The level of scrutiny increases as the gap between fair value and carrying amount decreases. Changes in any of these assumptions could result in management reaching a different conclusion regarding the potential impairment, which could be material. Our impairment evaluations inherently involve uncertainties from uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.
Further discussion of the impairment charges recognized by the Company can be found within Note 8—9—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assetsand Note 19—22—Asset Impairment Expense to the Consolidated Financial


Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Fair ValueDepreciation— Depreciation, after consideration of salvage value and asset retirement obligations, is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are determined on a composite or component basis. The Company considers many factors in its estimate of useful lives, including expected usage, physical deterioration, technological changes, existence and length of off-taker agreements, and laws and regulations, among others. In certain circumstances, these estimates involve significant judgment and require management to forecast the impact of relevant factors over an extended time horizon.
Useful life estimates are continually evaluated for appropriateness as changes in the relevant factors arise, including when a long-lived asset group is tested for recoverability. Depreciation studies are performed periodically for assets subject to composite depreciation. Any change to useful lives is considered a change in accounting estimate and is made on a prospective basis.
Fair Value — For information regarding the fair value hierarchy, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments— A significant number of the Company's financial instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings or other comprehensive income each period. Investments are generally fair valued based on quoted market prices or other observable market data such as interest rate indices. The Company's investments are primarily certificates of deposit government debt securities and money marketmutual funds. Derivatives


113 | 2020 Annual Report

are valued using observable data as inputs into internal valuation models. The Company's derivatives primarily consist of interest rate swaps, foreign currency instruments, and commodity and embedded derivatives. Additional discussion regarding the nature of these financial instruments and valuation techniques can be found in Note 4—5—Fair Value included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities— Significant estimates are made in determining the fair value of long-lived tangible and intangible assets (i.e., property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill) during the impairment evaluation process. In addition, the majority of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination and asset acquisitions by VIEs are required to be recognized at fair value under the relevant accounting guidance.
The Company may engage an independent valuation firm to assist management with the valuation. The Company generally utilizes the income approach to value nonfinancial assets and liabilities, specifically a Discounted Cash Flow ("DCF") model to estimate fair value by discounting our internal budgets and cash flow forecasts, adjusted to reflect market participant assumptions, to the extent necessary, at an appropriate discount rate.
Management applies considerable judgment in selecting several input assumptions during the development of our internal budgets and cash flow forecasts. Examples of the input assumptions that our budgets and forecasts are sensitive to include macroeconomic factors such as growth rates, industry demand, inflation, exchange rates, power prices, and commodity prices. Whenever appropriate, management obtains these input assumptions from observable market data sources (e.g., Economic Intelligence Unit) and extrapolates the market information if an input assumption is not observable for the entire forecast period. Many of these input assumptions are dependent on other economic assumptions, which are often derived from statistical economic models with inherent limitations such as estimation differences. Further, several input assumptions are based on historical trends which often do not recur. It is not uncommon that different market data sources have different views of the macroeconomic factor expectations and related assumptions. As a result, macroeconomic factors and related assumptions are often available in a narrow range; however, in some situations these ranges become wide and the use of a different set of input assumptions could produce significantly different budgets and cash flow forecasts.
A considerable amount of judgment is also applied in the estimation of the discount rate used in the DCF model. To the extent practical, inputs to the discount rate are obtained from market data sources (e.g., Bloomberg). The Company selects and uses a set of publicly traded companies from the relevant industry to estimate the discount rate inputs. Management applies judgment in the selection of such companies based on its view of the most likely market participants. It is reasonably possible that the selection of a different set of likely market participants could produce different input assumptions and result in the use of a different discount rate.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities— We enter into various derivative transactions in order to hedge our exposure to certain market risks. We primarily use derivative instruments to manage our interest rate, commodity, and foreign currency exposures. We do not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes. See Note 5—6—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information on the classification.
The fair value measurement standard requires the Company to consider and reflect the assumptions of market participants in the fair value calculation. These factors include nonperformance risk (the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled) and credit risk, both of the reporting entity (for liabilities) and of the counterparty (for assets). Due to the nature of the Company's interest rate swaps, which are typically associated with non-recourse debt, creditCredit risk for AES is evaluated at the subsidiary level rather than atof the Parent Company level.entity that is party to the contract. Nonperformance risk on the Company's derivative instruments is an adjustment to the initial asset/liability fair value position that is derived from internally developed valuation models that utilize observable market inputs.inputs that may or may not be observable.
As a result of uncertainty, complexity, and judgment, accounting estimates related to derivative accounting could result in material changes to our financial statements under different conditions or utilizing different


assumptions. As a part of accounting for these derivatives, we make estimates concerning nonperformance, volatilities, market liquidity, future commodity prices, interest rates, credit ratings, (both ours and our counterparty's), and future foreign exchange rates. Refer to Note 4—5—Fair Value included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional details.
The fair value of our derivative portfolio is generally determined using internal and third party valuation models, most of which are based on observable market inputs, including interest rate curves and forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. The Company derives most of its financial instrument market assumptions from market efficient data sources (e.g., Bloomberg, Reuters and Platt's). In some cases, where market data is not readily available, management uses comparable market sources and empirical evidence to derive market


114 | 2020 Annual Report

assumptions to determine a financial instrument's fair value. In certain instances, the published curvepricing may not extend through the remaining term of the contract and management must make assumptions to extrapolate the curve. Specifically, where there is limited forward curve data with respect to foreign exchange contracts beyond the traded points, the Company utilizes the interest rate differential approach to construct the remaining portion of the forward curve. Additionally, in the absence of quoted prices, we may rely on "indicative pricing" quotes from financial institutions to input into our valuation model for certain of our foreign currency swaps. These indicative pricing quotes do not constitute either a bid or ask price and therefore are not considered observable market data. For individual contracts, the use of different valuation models or assumptions could have a material effect on the calculated fair value.
Regulatory Assets— Management continually assesses whether the regulatory assets are probable of future recovery by considering factors such as applicable regulatory changes, recent rate orders applicable to other regulated entities, and the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation. If future recovery of costs ceases to be probable, any asset write-offs would be required to be recognized in operating income.
Consolidation— The Company enters into transactions impacting the Company's equity interests in its affiliates. In connection with each transaction, the Company must determine whether the transaction impacts the Company's consolidation conclusion by first determining whether the transaction should be evaluated under the variable interest model or the voting model. In determining which consolidation model applies to the transaction, the Company is required to make judgments about how the entity operates, the most significant of which are whether (i) the entity has sufficient equity to finance its activities, (ii) the equity holders, as a group, have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, and (iii) whether the entity has non-substantive voting rights.
If the entity is determined to be a variable interest entity, the most significant judgment in determining whether the Company must consolidate the entity is whether the Company, including its related parties and de facto agents, collectively have power and benefits. If AES is determined to have power and benefits, the entity will be consolidated by AES.
Alternatively, if the entity is determined to be a voting model entity, the most significant judgments involve determining whether the non-AES shareholders have substantive participating rights. The assessment of shareholder rights and whether they are substantive participating rights requires significant judgment since the rights provided under shareholders' agreements may include selecting, terminating, and setting the compensation of management responsible for implementing the subsidiary's policies and procedures, and establishing operating and capital decisions of the entity, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business. On the other hand, if shareholder rights are only protective in nature (referred to as protective rights), then such rights would not overcome the presumption that the owner of a majority voting interest shall consolidate its investee. Significant judgment is required to determine whether minority rights represent substantive participating rights or protective rights that do not affect the evaluation of control. While both represent an approval or veto right, a distinguishing factor is the underlying activity or action to which the right relates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans— The Company recognizes a net asset or liability reflecting the funded status of pension and other postretirement plans with current-year changes in actuarial gains or losses recognized in AOCL, except for those plans at certain of the Company's regulated utilities that can recover portions of their pension and postretirement obligations through future rates. The valuation of the Company's benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and net periodic benefit costs requires various estimates and assumptions, the most significant of which include the discount rate and expected return on plan assets. These assumptions are reviewed by the Company on an annual basis. Refer to Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
New Accounting Pronouncements Revenue RecognitionSeeThe Company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of energy, capacity, and other services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled. In applying the revenue model, we determine whether the sale of energy, capacity, and other services represent a single performance obligation based on the individual market and terms of the contract. Generally, the promise to transfer energy and capacity represent a performance obligation that is satisfied over time and meets the criteria to be accounted for as a series of distinct goods or services. Progress toward satisfaction of a performance obligation is measured using output methods, such as MWhs delivered or MWs made available, and when we are entitled to consideration in an amount that corresponds directly to the value of our performance completed to date, we recognize revenue in the amount to which we have the right to invoice. For further information regarding the nature of our revenue streams and our critical accounting policies affecting revenue recognition, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesincluded in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Leases— The Company recognizes operating and finance right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the


115 | 2020 Annual Report

Consolidated Balance Sheets for most leases with an initial term of greater than 12 months. Lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. Our subsidiaries’ incremental borrowing rates are used in determining the present value of lease payments when the implicit rate is not readily determinable. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as prepayments, lease incentives, or initial direct costs. For further information regarding the nature of our leases and our critical accounting policies affecting leases, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Credit Losses — The Company uses a forward-looking "expected loss" model to recognize allowances for credit losses on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, the Company continues to measure credit losses as it was done under previous GAAP, except that unrealized losses due to credit-related factors are now recognized as an allowance on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with a corresponding adjustment to earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For further information regarding credit losses, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
New Accounting Pronouncements
    See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for further information about new accounting pronouncements adopted during 20172020 and accounting pronouncements issued, but not yet effective.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Overview Regarding Market Risks
Our businesses are exposed to and proactively manage market risk. Our primary market risk exposure is to the price of commodities, particularly electricity, oil, natural gas, coal, and environmental credits. In addition, our businesses are also exposed to lower electricity prices due to increased competition, including from renewable sources such as wind and solar, as a result of lower costs of entry and lower variable costs. We operate in multiple countries and as such are subject to volatility in exchange rates at varying degrees at the subsidiary level and between our functional currency, the U.S. dollar,USD, and currencies of the countries in which we operate. We are also exposed to interest rate fluctuations due to our issuance of debt and related financial instruments.
The disclosures presented in this Item 7A are based upon a number of assumptions; actual effects may differ. The safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall apply to the disclosures contained in this Item 7A. For further information regarding market risk, see Item 1A.—Risk Factors, Our financial position and results of operations may fluctuate significantly due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates experienced at our foreign operations, Our businesses may incur substantial costs; Wholesale power prices are declining in many markets and liabilities and be exposed to price volatility as a result of risks associated with the electricity markets, whichthis could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance,operations and opportunities for future growth;We may not be adequately hedged against our exposure to changes in commodity prices or interest ratesrates; and Certain of our businesses are sensitive to variations in weather and hydrology of this 20172020 Form 10-K.
Commodity Price Risk
Although we prefer to hedge our exposure to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity, fuels, and environmental credits, some of our generation businesses operate under short-term sales or under contract sales that leave an unhedged exposure on some of our capacity or through imperfect fuel pass-throughs. In our utility businesses, we may be exposed to commodity price movements depending on our excess or shortfall of generation relative to load obligations and sharing or pass-through mechanisms. These businesses subject our operational results to the volatility of prices for electricity, fuels, and environmental credits in competitive markets. We employ risk management strategies to hedge our financial performance against the effects of fluctuations in energy commodity prices. The implementation of these strategies can involve the use of physical and financial commodity contracts, futures, swaps, and options.
The portion of our sales and purchases that are not subject to such agreements or contracted businesses where indexation is not perfectly matched to business drivers will be exposed to commodity price risk. When hedging the output of our generation assets, we utilize contract sales that lock in the spread per MWh between variable costs and the price at which the electricity can be sold.
AES businesses will see changes in variable margin performance as global commodity prices shift. For 2018,2021, we project pre-tax earnings exposure on a 10% move in commodity prices would be approximately $10 million for U.S. power (DPL), less than $5 million for power,


116 | 2020 Annual Report

less than $(5) million for natural gas, $(5) million for coal, and less than $5 million for oil and $5 million for coal.oil.Our estimates exclude correlation of oil with coal or natural gas. For example, a decline in oil or natural gas prices can be accompanied by a decline in coal price if commodity prices are correlated. In aggregate, the Company's downside exposure occurs with lower power, lower oil, lowerhigher natural gas, and higher coal prices. Exposures at individual businesses will change as new contracts or financial hedges are executed, and our sensitivity to changes in commodity prices generally increases in later years with reduced hedge levels at some of our businesses.
Commodity prices affect our businesses differently depending on the local market characteristics and risk management strategies. Spot power prices, contract indexation provisions, and generation costs can be directly or indirectly affected by movements in the price of natural gas, oil, and coal. We have some natural offsets across our businesses such that low commodity prices may benefit certain businesses and be a cost to others. Exposures are not perfectly linear or symmetric. The sensitivities are affected by a number of local or indirect market factors. Examples of these factors include hydrology, local energy market supply/demand balances, regional fuel supply issues, regional competition, bidding strategies, and regulatory interventions such as price caps. Operational flexibility changes the shape of our sensitivities. For instance, certain power plants may limit downside exposure by reducing dispatch in low market environments. Volume variation also affects our commodity exposure. The volume sold under contracts or retail concessions can vary based on weather and economic conditions, resulting in a higher or lower volume of sales in spot markets. Thermal unit availability and hydrology can affect the generation output available for sale and can affect the marginal unit setting power prices.
In the US and Utilities SBU, the generation businesses are largely contracted but may have residual risk to the extent contracts are not perfectly indexed to the business drivers. IPL primarily generatesAt Southland, our existing once-through cooling generation units (“Legacy Assets”) have been requested to continue operating beyond their current retirement date and have been approved for an extended permit for between one and three years. These assets have contracts in capacity and have seen incremental value in energy to meet its retail customer demand; however, it opportunistically sells surplus economic energy into wholesale markets at market prices. Additionally, at DPL, competitive retail markets permit our customers to select alternative energy suppliers or elect to remain in aggregated customer pools for which energy is supplied by third party suppliers through a


competitive auction process. DPL participates in these auctions held by other utilities and sells the remainder of its economic energy into the wholesale market. Given that natural gas-fired generators generally get energy prices for many markets, higher natural gas prices tend to expand our coal fixed margins. Our non-contracted generation margins are impacted by many factors, including the growth in natural gas-fired generation plants, new energy supply from renewable sources, and increasing energy efficiency.revenues.
In the AndesSouth America SBU, our business in Chile owns assets in the central and northern regions of the country and has a portfolio of contract sales in both. In the central region, the contract sales generally cover the efficient generation fromThe significant portion of our coal-fired and hydroelectric assets. Any residual spot price risk will primarily be driven by the amountPPAs include mechanisms of hydrological inflows. In the case of low hydroelectric generation, spot price exposure is capped by the ability to dispatch our natural gas/diesel assets,indexation that adjust the price of which dependsenergy based on fuel pricing atfluctuations in the time required. There is a small amountprice of coal, generationwith the specific indices and timing varying by contract, in order to mitigate changes in the northern region that isprice of fuel. For the portion of our contracts not covered byindexed to the portfolioprice of contract sales and therefore subjectcoal, we have implemented a hedging strategy based on international coal financial instruments for up to spot price risk. In both regions, generators with oil or oil-linked fuel generally set power prices.3 years. In Colombia, we operate under a short-termshorter-term sales strategy and have commoditywith spot market exposure to unhedgedfor uncontracted volumes. Because we own hydroelectric assets there, contracts are not indexed to fuel.
In the Additionally, in Brazil, SBU, the hydroelectric generating facility is covered by contract sales. Under normal hydrological volatility, spot price risk is mitigated through a regulated sharing mechanism across all hydroelectric generators in the country. Under drier conditions, the sharing mechanism may not be sufficient to cover the business' contract position, and therefore it may have to purchase power at spot prices driven by the cost of thermal generation.
In the MCAC SBU, our businesses have commodity exposure on unhedged volumes. Panama is highly contracted under a portfolio of fixed volume contract sales.financial and load-following PPA type structures, exposing the business to hydrology-based variance. To the extent hydrological inflows are greater than or less than the contract sales volume,volumes, the business will be sensitive to changes in spot power prices which may be driven by oil and natural gas prices in some time periods. In the Dominican Republic, we own natural gas-firedgas- and coal-fired assets contracted under a portfolio of contract sales, and a coal-fired asset contracted with a single contract, and both contract and spot prices may move with commodity prices. Additionally, the contract levels do not always match our generation availability and our assets may be sellers of spot prices in excess of contract levels or a net buyer in the spot market to satisfy contract obligations.
In the Eurasia SBU, our Kilroot facility operates on a short-term sales strategy. To the extent that sales are unhedged, the commodity risk at our Kilroot business is to the clean dark spread, which is the difference between electricity priceassets operating in Vietnam and our coal-based variable dispatch cost, including emissions. Natural gas-fired generators set power prices for many periods, so higher natural gas prices generally expand margins and higher coal or emissions prices reduce them. Similarly, increased wind generators displace higher cost generation, reducing Kilroot's margins, and vice versa. Two coal-fired generating units at Kilroot and one steam gas generating unit at Ballylumford are expected to close by the end of May 2018 as a result of unfavorable capacity market conditions in Northern Ireland. The remaining steam gas generating unit at Ballylumford and the OCGTs at both Ballylumford and Kilroot will continue to operate as peaking units at times of high demand. Our Masinloc business is a coal-fired generation facility which hedges its output under a portfolio of contract sales that are indexed to fuel prices, with generation in excess of contract volume or shortfalls of generation relative to contract volumes settled in the spot market. Low oil prices may be a driver of margin compression since oil affects spot power sale prices sold in the spot market. Our Mong Duong business hasBulgaria have minimal exposure to commodity price risk as it has no or minor merchant exposure and fuel is subject to a pass-through mechanism.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency risk and other foreign operations risks that arise from investments in foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. A key component of these risks stems from the fact that some of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates utilize currencies other than our consolidated reporting currency, the U.S. dollar ("USD").USD. Additionally, certain of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates have entered into monetary obligations in USD or currencies other than their own functional currencies. Certain of our foreign subsidiaries calculate and pay taxes in currencies other than their own functional currency. We have varying degrees of exposure to changes in the exchange rate between the USD and the following currencies: Argentine peso, British pound, Brazilian real, Chilean peso, Colombian peso, Dominican peso, Euro, Indian rupee, and Mexican peso. These subsidiaries and affiliates have attempted to


117 | 2020 Annual Report

limit potential foreign exchange exposure by entering into revenue contracts that adjust to changes in foreign exchange rates. We also use foreign currency forwards, swaps, and options where possible to manage our risk related to certain foreign currency fluctuations.
AES enters into cash flowforeign currency hedges to protect economic value of the business and minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations to AES' portfolio. While protecting cash flows, the hedging strategy is also designed to reduce forward-looking earnings foreign exchange volatility. Due to variation of timing and amount between cash distributiondistributions and earnings exposure, the hedge impact may not fully cover the earnings exposure on a realized basis, which could result in greater volatility in earnings. The largest foreign exchange risks over a 12-month forward-


lookingforward-looking period stem from the following currencies: Brazilian real, Euro,Colombian peso, and British pound.Euro. As of December 31, 2017,2020, assuming a 10% USD appreciation, cash distributions attributable to foreign subsidiaries exposed to movement in the exchange rate of the Brazilian real, Euro, and British pound each isare projected to be reducedimpacted by less than $5 million.$(5) million each for Brazilian real, Colombia peso, and Euro. These numbers have been produced by applying a one-time 10% USD appreciation to forecasted exposed cash distributions for 20182021 coming from the respective subsidiaries exposed to the currencies listed above, net of the impact of outstanding hedges and holding all other variables constant. The numbers presented above are net of any transactional gains/losses. These sensitivities may change in the future as new hedges are executed or existing hedges are unwound. Additionally, updates to the forecasted cash distributions exposed to foreign exchange risk may result in further modification. The sensitivities presented do not capture the impacts of any administrative market restrictions or currency inconvertibility.
Interest Rate Risks
We are exposed to risk resulting from changes in interest rates as a result of our issuance of variablevariable-rate and fixed-rate debt, as well as interest rate swap, cap, floor, and option agreements.
Decisions on the fixed-floating debt mix are made to be consistent with the risk factors faced by individual businesses or plants. Depending on whether a plant's capacity payments or revenue stream is fixed or varies with inflation, we partially hedge against interest rate fluctuations by arranging fixed-ratefixed- or variable-rate financing. In certain cases, particularly for non-recourse financing, we execute interest rate swap, cap, and floor agreements to effectively fix or limit the interest rate exposure on the underlying financing. Most of our interest rate risk is related to non-recourse financings at our businesses.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the portfolio's pre-tax earnings exposure for 20182021 to a one-time 100-basis-point increase in interest rates for our Argentine peso, Brazilian real, Chilean peso, Colombian peso, Euro, and USD denominated debt would be approximately $25$20 million on interest expense for the debt denominated in these currencies. These amounts do not take into account the historical correlation between these interest rates.




118 | 2020 Annual Report


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of The AES Corporation:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The AES Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, and2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 26, 2018,24, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures includeincluded examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.








119 | 2020 Annual Report

Goodwill Impairment Evaluation of the Gener Reporting Unit
Description of the Matter
The Company’s goodwill balance was $1,061 million at December 31, 2020, of which $868 million relates to the Gener reporting unit. As disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. The goodwill impairment test at the Gener reporting unit involves the use of significant unobservable inputs to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. This estimate of fair value is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit to determine whether goodwill is impaired.
Auditing the Company's measurement of the fair value of the Gener reporting unit involved a high degree of subjectivity given the lack of observable inputs to estimate the reporting unit’s fair value. Key inputs that had a significant impact on the valuation included the prospective financial information (including the estimated growth in renewable projects, forward electricity prices and developments in the Chilean capacity market) and the discount rate, which are forward-looking and based upon expectations about future economic and market conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s goodwill impairment review process at the Gener reporting unit. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the valuation model, the significant assumptions used to develop the estimates, and the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the valuations.

To test the estimated fair value of the Company’s Gener reporting unit, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used to develop the estimate of fair value, testing the significant assumptions discussed above, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends as well as historical results. We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the reporting unit that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also involved valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the overall methodologies and the discount rate used in the fair value estimate.
Evaluation of Impairment Indicators and Re-evaluation of Useful Lives
Description of the Matter
At December 31, 2020, the Company's property, plant and equipment had an aggregate net carrying value of approximately $22,826 million. As disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of long-lived assets in a held-for-use asset group may not be recoverable, the Company evaluates the assets for potential impairment, and re-evaluates the remaining useful life. These circumstances may include, but are not limited to, changes in the regulatory environment, demand, power prices or fuel costs, technological advancements, physical deterioration, or an expectation it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its useful life.

Auditing the Company's identification and evaluation of impairment indicators involved significant auditor judgment considering the many geographic, regulatory and economic environments in which the Company operates. Similarly, auditing the Company’s re-evaluation of useful lives required a high degree of subjectivity, particularly as it relates to the Company’s coal generation assets given the Company’s decarbonization initiatives and the potential risks associated with climate change that have led to increased regulation and other actions. These audit procedures required an evaluation of a wide variety of circumstances for potential changes in useful lives or impairment indicators.


120 | 2020 Annual Report

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s identification of impairment indicators and estimation of useful lives (including any changes if necessary). This included management’s monitoring controls over businesses that have had been affected or are expected to be affected by the circumstances above.

Our audit procedures included, among others, making inquiries of management (including personnel in operations) to understand changes in the businesses, reading industry journals and publications to independently identify changes in the regulatory environments or the geographic areas and evaluating whether management has considered identified changes, if any. We considered businesses for which current power prices are significantly less than contractual prices within Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) that are also near expiration. We also considered the Company’s ability to re-contract certain of its coal generation assets upon the expiration of a PPA, given the most recent legislative or regulatory changes. We evaluated the Company’s analysis of the useful lives of its coal generation assets, considering the existing PPAs and the Company’s ability to use the assets subsequent to the expiration of a PPA, based on any regulatory or market changes. For projects that were still under construction, we compared the Company's actual progress to their budgets, inspected engineering reports when considered appropriate, and considered project overruns. We reviewed disaggregated financial results for deterioration in earnings performance compared to prior periods, negative cash flows from operations, and working capital deficiencies and assessed whether these would represent impairment indicators, when applicable. We also considered and assessed conditions and trends in the industry and the underlying economies and evaluated sale or disposition activities.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Evaluation of AES Gener
Description of the Matter
As disclosed in Footnote 22 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense at AES Gener in Chile as a result of the early termination of two PPAs at the Angamos coal-fired plant and the Company’s intention to accelerate the retirement of the Ventanas 1 and Ventanas 2 coal-fired plants. Based on the impairment analyses, the Company determined that the carrying amounts of these asset groups were not recoverable and recognized a $781 million asset impairment expense, which represented the amount by which the carrying value exceeded the estimated fair value of $306 million.

Auditing the Company’s long-lived asset impairment analyses involved significant judgment related to the assessment of the asset groups and estimation of the related fair value. The assessment of the asset groups required considerable judgment as varying facts and circumstances could justify different grouping of assets for impairment review. Auditing the Company’s estimates of the fair value of asset groups in AES Gener involved a high degree of subjectivity given the lack of observable inputs to estimate the fair value. Key inputs that had a significant impact on the valuation included the prospective financial information (including the retirement dates of the plants) and the discount rate, which are forward-looking and based upon expectations about future economic and market conditions.



121 | 2020 Annual Report

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s long-lived asset impairment process. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the valuation model, the significant assumptions used to develop the estimates, and the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the valuations.

Our audit procedures included, among others, obtaining an understanding of how the plants are managed at AES Gener given the regulatory changes, evaluating management’s assessment of the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, assessing the appropriateness of methodologies, testing the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, latest regulations as well as historical results. We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the asset groups that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also involved valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the overall methodology and the discount rate used in the fair value estimate.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2008.

Tysons, Virginia
February 26, 2018



THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
 2017 2016
 (in millions, except share and per share data)
ASSETS   
CURRENT ASSETS   
Cash and cash equivalents$949
 $1,244
Restricted cash274
 277
Short-term investments424
 530
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $10 and $17, respectively1,463
 1,421
Inventory562
 622
Prepaid expenses62
 72
Other current assets630
 657
Current assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses2,034
 1,593
Total current assets6,398
 6,416
NONCURRENT ASSETS   
Property, Plant and Equipment:   
Land502
 518
Electric generation, distribution assets and other24,119
 24,911
Accumulated depreciation(7,942) (7,919)
Construction in progress3,617
 2,905
Property, plant and equipment, net20,296
 20,415
Other Assets:   
Investments in and advances to affiliates1,197
 621
Debt service reserves and other deposits565
 438
Goodwill1,059
 1,157
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $441 and $399, respectively366
 287
Deferred income taxes130
 227
Service concession assets, net of accumulated amortization of $206 and $114, respectively1,360
 1,445
Other noncurrent assets1,741
 1,775
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses
 3,343
Total other assets6,418
 9,293
TOTAL ASSETS$33,112
 $36,124
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
CURRENT LIABILITIES   
Accounts payable$1,371
 $1,238
Accrued interest228
 216
Accrued and other liabilities1,232
 1,117
Non-recourse debt, including $1,012 and $273, respectively, related to variable interest entities2,164
 1,052
Current liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses1,033
 1,654
Total current liabilities6,028
 5,277
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES   
Recourse debt4,625
 4,671
Non-recourse debt, including $1,358 and $1,502 respectively, related to variable interest entities13,176
 13,731
Deferred income taxes1,006
 804
Pension and other postretirement liabilities230
 237
Other noncurrent liabilities2,365
 2,327
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses
 2,595
Total noncurrent liabilities21,402
 24,365
Commitments and Contingencies (see Notes 11 and 12)
 
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries837
 782
EQUITY   
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized; 816,312,913 issued and 660,388,128 outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 816,061,123 issued and 659,182,232 outstanding at December 31, 2016)8
 8
Additional paid-in capital8,501
 8,592
Accumulated deficit(2,276) (1,146)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,876) (2,756)
Treasury stock, at cost (155,924,785 and 156,878,891 shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)(1,892) (1,904)
Total AES Corporation stockholders’ equity2,465
 2,794
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS2,380
 2,906
Total equity4,845
 5,700
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$33,112
 $36,124
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 201524, 2021

 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue:     
Regulated$3,109
 $3,310
 $3,240
Non-Regulated7,421
 6,971
 8,020
Total revenue10,530
 10,281
 11,260
Cost of Sales:     
Regulated(2,656) (2,844) (3,074)
Non-Regulated(5,410) (5,057) (5,523)
Total cost of sales(8,066) (7,901) (8,597)
Operating margin2,464
 2,380
 2,663
General and administrative expenses(215) (194) (196)
Interest expense(1,170) (1,134) (1,145)
Interest income244
 245
 256
Loss on extinguishment of debt(68) (13) (182)
Other expense(57) (79) (24)
Other income120
 64
 84
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses(52) 29
 29
Goodwill impairment expense
 
 (317)
Asset impairment expense(537) (1,096) (285)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)42
 (15) 106
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES771
 187
 989
Income tax expense(990) (32) (412)
Net equity in earnings of affiliates71
 36
 105
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(148) 191
 682
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(21), $229, and $(53), respectively(18) 151
 80
Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses, net of income tax benefit of $0, $266, and $0, respectively(611) (1,119) 
NET INCOME (LOSS)(777) (777) 762
Noncontrolling interests:     
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(359) (211) (364)
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests(25) (142) (92)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(1,161) $(1,130) $306
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax$(507) $(20) $318
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(654) (1,110) (12)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(1,161) $(1,130) $306
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax(0.99) (1.68) (0.01)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$(1.76) $(1.72) $0.45
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax(0.99) (1.68) (0.02)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$(1.76) $(1.72) $0.44
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE$0.49
 $0.45
 $0.41

122    


Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2020 and 2019
20202019
(in millions, except share and per share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents$1,089 $1,029 
Restricted cash297 336 
Short-term investments335 400 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $13 and $20, respectively1,300 1,479 
Inventory461 487 
Prepaid expenses102 80 
Other current assets, net of allowance of $0726 802 
Current held-for-sale assets1,104 618 
Total current assets5,414 5,231 
NONCURRENT ASSETS
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land417 447 
Electric generation, distribution assets and other26,707 25,383 
Accumulated depreciation(8,472)(8,505)
Construction in progress4,174 5,249 
Property, plant and equipment, net22,826 22,574 
Other Assets:
Investments in and advances to affiliates835 966 
Debt service reserves and other deposits441 207 
Goodwill1,061 1,059 
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $330 and $307, respectively827 469 
Deferred income taxes288 156 
Loan receivable, net of allowance of $01,351 
Other noncurrent assets, net of allowance of $21 and $0, respectively1,660 1,635 
Noncurrent held-for-sale assets1,251 
Total other assets6,363 5,843 
TOTAL ASSETS$34,603 $33,648 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable$1,156 $1,311 
Accrued interest191 201 
Accrued non-income taxes257 253 
Deferred income438 34 
Accrued and other liabilities1,223 987 
Non-recourse debt, including $336 and $337, respectively, related to variable interest entities1,430 1,868 
Current held-for-sale liabilities667 442 
Total current liabilities5,362 5,096 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Recourse debt3,446 3,391 
Non-recourse debt, including $3,918 and $3,872, respectively, related to variable interest entities15,005 14,914 
Deferred income taxes1,100 1,213 
Other noncurrent liabilities3,241 2,917 
Noncurrent held-for-sale liabilities857 
Total noncurrent liabilities23,649 22,435 
Commitments and Contingencies (see Notes 12 and 13)00
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries872 888 
EQUITY
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized; 818,398,654 issued and 665,370,128 outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 817,843,916 issued and 663,952,656 outstanding at December 31, 2019)
Additional paid-in capital7,561 7,776 
Accumulated deficit(680)(692)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,397)(2,229)
Treasury stock, at cost (153,028,526 and 153,891,260 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively)(1,858)(1,867)
Total AES Corporation stockholders’ equity2,634 2,996 
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS2,086 2,233 
Total equity4,720 5,229 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$34,603 $33,648 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015


 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$(777) $(777) $762
Foreign currency translation activity:     
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $17, $1, and $1, respectively(9) 189
 (1,019)
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods643
 992
 
Total foreign currency translation adjustments634
 1,181
 (1,019)
Derivative activity:     
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $10, $(7) and $16, respectively(12) 5
 (57)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $1, $8 and $11, respectively50
 37
 66
Total change in fair value of derivatives38
 42
 9
Pension activity:     
Change in pension adjustments due to prior service cost, net of income tax expense of $1, $6, and $0 respectively2
 11
 1
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $6, $106, and $(29), respectively(21) (208) 60
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $135, $3, and $9, respectively266
 10
 16
Total pension adjustments247
 (187) 77
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)919
 1,036
 (933)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)142
 259
 (171)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(390) (262) (133)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(248) $(3) $(304)

123    



Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
202020192018
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Regulated$2,661 $3,028 $2,939 
Non-Regulated6,999 7,161 7,797 
Total revenue9,660 10,189 10,736 
Cost of Sales:
Regulated(2,235)(2,484)(2,473)
Non-Regulated(4,732)(5,356)(5,690)
Total cost of sales(6,967)(7,840)(8,163)
Operating margin2,693 2,349 2,573 
General and administrative expenses(165)(196)(192)
Interest expense(1,038)(1,050)(1,056)
Interest income268 318 310 
Loss on extinguishment of debt(186)(169)(188)
Other expense(53)(80)(58)
Other income75 145 72 
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests(95)28 984 
Asset impairment expense(864)(185)(208)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)55 (67)(72)
Other non-operating expense(202)(92)(147)
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES488 1,001 2,018 
Income tax expense(216)(352)(708)
Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates(123)(172)39 
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS149 477 1,349 
Loss from operations of discontinued businesses, net of income tax expense of $0, $0, and $2, respectively(9)
Gain from disposal of discontinued businesses, net of income tax expense of $0, $0, and $44, respectively225 
NET INCOME152 478 1,565 
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(106)(175)(364)
Less: Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$46 $303 $1,203 
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
Income from continuing operations, net of tax$43 $302 $985 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax218 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$46 $303 $1,203 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.06 $0.46 $1.49 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 0.33 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$0.07 $0.46 $1.82 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.06 $0.45 $1.48 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 0.33 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$0.07 $0.45 $1.81 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015
 THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS  
 Common Stock Treasury Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
(in millions)Shares Amount Shares Amount 
Balance at December 31, 2014814.5
 $8
 110.7
 $(1,371) $8,409
 $512
 $(3,286) $3,053
Net income
 
 
 
 
 306
 
 456
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 (674) (345)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 43
 (34)
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 21
 56
Total other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 (610) (323)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
 
 
 
 
 (18) 13
 
Acquisition of a business (1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 15
Disposition of businesses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (41)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 (27) 
 
 (383)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 126
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (280) 
 
Purchase of treasury stock
 
 39.7
 (482) 
 
 
 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax1.3
 
 (1.4) 16
 13
 
 
 
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 323
 (377) 
 119
Balance at December 31, 2015815.8
 $8
 149.0
 $(1,837) $8,718
 $143
 $(3,883) $3,022
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (1,130) 
 353
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 1,109
 72
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 30
 12
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 (12) (175)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 1,127
 (91)
Fair value adjustment (2)

 
 
 
 17
 (4) 
 (17)
Disposition of businesses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 (10) 
 
 (430)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 60
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 
 
 (226) (71) 
 
Purchase of treasury stock
 
 8.7
 (79) 
 
 
 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.3
 
 (0.8) 12
 11
 
 
 
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 84
 (84) 
 17
Acquisition and reclassification of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 (2) 
 
 (17)
Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries (3)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 11
Balance at December 31, 2016816.1
 $8
 156.9
 $(1,904) $8,592
 $(1,146) $(2,756) $2,906
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (1,161) 
 384
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 661
 (27)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 23
 15
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 229
 18
Total other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 913
 6
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
 
 
 
 
 31
 
 
Fair value adjustment (2)

 
 
 
 (25) 
 
 
Disposition of businesses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (666)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (426)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 11
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 
 
 (324) 
 
 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.2
 
 (1.0) 12
 5
 
 
 
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 13
 
 7
 83
Acquisition of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 240
 
 (40) 68
Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries (3)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 14
Balance at December 31, 2017816.3
 $8
 155.9
 $(1,892) $8,501
 $(2,276) $(1,876) $2,380

124    
(1) Fair value
Consolidated Statements of a tax equity partner's right to preferential returns recognized as a result of the acquisition of Solar Power PR, LLC, which was previously accounted for as an equity method investment.Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(2) Adjustment to the carrying amount of noncontrolling interest and redeemable stock of subsidiaries to fair value.
(3) Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $398 million and net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries of $14 million for the yearYears ended December 31, 2017. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $364 million2020, 2019, and net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries of $11 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018

202020192018
(in millions)
NET INCOME$152 $478 $1,565 
Foreign currency translation activity:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(8), $1, and $2, respectively(52)(33)(161)
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods192 23 (21)
Total foreign currency translation adjustments140 (10)(182)
Derivative activity:
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit of $110, $74, and $27, respectively(368)(265)(67)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $17, $12, and $24, respectively74 42 93 
Total change in fair value of derivatives(294)(223)26 
Pension activity:
Change in pension adjustments due to prior service cost, net of income tax benefit of $0, $0, and $1, respectively(2)
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax benefit of $4, $10, and $1, respectively(14)(23)(1)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $0, $13, and $2, respectively28 
Total pension adjustments(13)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(167)(227)(151)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)(15)251 1,414 
Less: Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(102)(425)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(11)$149 $989 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015Statements.
 2017 2016 2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(in millions)
Net income (loss)$(777) $(777) $762
Adjustments to net income (loss):     
Depreciation and amortization1,169
 1,176
 1,144
Loss (gain) on sales and disposals of businesses52
 (29) (29)
Impairment expenses537
 1,098
 602
Deferred income taxes672
 (793) (50)
Provisions for (reversals of) contingencies34
 48
 (72)
Loss on extinguishment of debt68
 20
 186
Loss on sale and disposal of assets43
 38
 20
Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses611
 1,383
 
Other146
 168
 8
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable(177) 237
 (378)
(Increase) decrease in inventory(28) 42
 (26)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets107
 870
 655
(Increase) decrease in other assets(295) (251) (1,305)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities163
 (620) 31
Increase (decrease) in income tax payables, net and other tax payables53
 (199) 53
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities111
 473
 533
Net cash provided by operating activities2,489
 2,884
 2,134
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:     
Capital expenditures(2,177) (2,345) (2,308)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, and equity method investments(625) (55) (17)
Proceeds from the sale of businesses, net of cash sold, and equity method investments108
 631
 138
Sale of short-term investments3,540
 4,904
 4,851
Purchase of short-term investments(3,310) (5,151) (4,801)
Increase in restricted cash, debt service reserves, and other assets(135) (61) (159)
Contributions to equity investments(89) (6) (3)
Other investing(61) (25) (67)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,749) (2,108) (2,366)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:     
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities2,156
 1,465
 959
Repayments under the revolving credit facilities(1,742) (1,433) (937)
Issuance of recourse debt1,025
 500
 575
Repayments of recourse debt(1,353) (808) (915)
Issuance of non-recourse debt3,222
 2,978
 4,248
Repayments of non-recourse debt(2,360) (2,666) (3,312)
Payments for financing fees(100) (105) (90)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(424) (476) (326)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests and redeemable security holders73
 190
 126
Proceeds from the sale of redeemable stock of subsidiaries
 134
 461
Dividends paid on AES common stock(317) (290) (276)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(179) (113) (150)
Purchase of treasury stock
 (79) (482)
Proceeds from sales to noncontrolling interests, net of transaction costs94
 
 154
Other financing(52) (44) (7)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities43
 (747) 28
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash3
 9
 (52)
Decrease (increase) in cash of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses(81) (12) 25
Total increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(295) 26
 (231)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning1,244
 1,218
 1,449
Cash and cash equivalents, ending$949
 $1,244
 $1,218
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:     
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$1,196
 $1,273
 $1,265
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds$377
 $487
 $388
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:     
Assets acquired through capital lease and other liabilities$
 $5
 $18
Dividends declared but not yet paid$86
 $174
 $135
Conversion of Alto Maipo loans and accounts payable into equity (see Note 14—Equity)
$279
 $
 $
Return Share Transfer Payment due (see Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions)
$75
 $
 $


125    

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS
Common StockTreasury Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Noncontrolling
Interests
(in millions)SharesAmountSharesAmount
Balance at December 31, 2017816.3 $155.9 $(1,892)$8,501 $(2,276)$(1,876)$2,380 
Net income1,203 360 
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax(235)53 
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax14 10 
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax(2)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)— — — — — — (214)61 
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (1)
68 19 81 
Fair value adjustment (2)
(4)
Disposition of business interests (3)
(250)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(343)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
Dividends declared on AES common stock ($0.53/share)(348)
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.9 (1.0)14 
Sales to noncontrolling interests(3)98 
Balance at December 31, 2018817.2 $154.9 $(1,878)$8,154 $(1,005)$(2,071)$2,396 
Net income303 182 
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax(10)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax(166)(57)
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax12 (6)
Total other comprehensive loss— — — — — — (154)(73)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (1)
10 (4)
Fair value adjustment (2)
(6)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(415)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
Dividends declared on AES common stock ($0.5528/share)(367)
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.6 (1.0)11 
Sales to noncontrolling interests(5)136 
Balance at December 31, 2019817.8 $153.9 $(1,867)$7,776 $(692)$(2,229)$2,233 
Net income46 98 
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax192 (52)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax(237)(29)
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax(12)(1)
Total other comprehensive loss— — — — — — (57)(82)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (1)
(34)(16)
Fair value adjustment (2)
(4)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(419)
Dividends declared on AES common stock ($0.5804/share)(386)
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.6 (0.9)
Sales to noncontrolling interests260 210 
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests(89)(121)(49)
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries111 
Balance at December 31, 2020818.4 $153.0 $(1,858)$7,561 $(680)$(2,397)$2,086 
(1) See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.
(2) Adjustment to record the redeemable stock of Colon at fair value.
(3) See Note 25Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.


See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015


126    

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
202020192018
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(in millions)
Net income$152 $478 $1,565 
Adjustments to net income:
Depreciation and amortization1,068 1,045 1,003 
Loss (gain) on disposal and sale of business interests95 (28)(984)
Impairment expense1,066 277 355 
Deferred income taxes(233)(8)313 
Provisions for (reversals of) contingencies(186)14 
Loss on extinguishment of debt186 169 188 
Loss (gain) on sale and disposal of assets(19)54 27 
Net gain from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses(269)
Loss of affiliates, net of dividends128 194 48 
Other208 321 269 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable48 73 (206)
(Increase) decrease in inventory(20)28 (36)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets13 42 (22)
(Increase) decrease in other assets(134)(20)(32)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities(186)(6)62 
Increase (decrease) in income tax payables, net and other tax payables59 (83)(7)
Increase (decrease) in deferred income431 28 (12)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities79 (101)67 
Net cash provided by operating activities2,755 2,466 2,343 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures(1,900)(2,405)(2,121)
Acquisitions of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash acquired(136)(192)(66)
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold169 178 2,020 
Sale of short-term investments627 666 1,302 
Purchase of short-term investments(653)(770)(1,411)
Contributions and loans to equity affiliates(332)(324)(145)
Insurance proceeds150 17 
Other investing(79)(24)(101)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,295)(2,721)(505)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities2,420 2,026 1,865 
Repayments under the revolving credit facilities(2,479)(1,735)(2,238)
Issuance of recourse debt3,419 1,000 
Repayments of recourse debt(3,366)(450)(1,933)
Issuance of non-recourse debt4,680 5,828 1,928 
Repayments of non-recourse debt(4,136)(4,831)(1,411)
Payments for financing fees(107)(126)(39)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(422)(427)(340)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests(259)
Sales to noncontrolling interests553 128 95 
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries112 
Dividends paid on AES common stock(381)(362)(344)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(60)(146)(275)
Other financing(52)49 
Net cash used in financing activities(78)(86)(1,643)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(24)(18)(54)
(Increase) decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of held-for-sale businesses(103)(72)74 
Total increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash255 (431)215 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning1,572 2,003 1,788 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, ending$1,827 $1,572 $2,003 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$908 $946 $1,003 
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds333 363 370 
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends declared but not yet paid100 95 90 
Notes payable issued for the acquisition of the Ventus Wind Complex (see Note 26)47 
Refinancing of non-recourse debt at Mong Duong (see Note 11)1,081 
Contributions to equity affiliates (see Note 8)61 20 
Partial reinvestment of consideration from the sPower transaction (see Note 8)58 
Exchange of debentures for the acquisition of the Guaimbê Solar Complex (see Note 26)119 
Acquisition of the remaining interest in a Distributed Energy equity affiliate (see Note 26)23 
Acquisition of intangible assets16 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


127 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The AES Corporation is a holding company (the "Parent Company") that, through its subsidiaries and affiliates, (collectively, "AES" or "the Company") operates a geographically diversified portfolio of electricity generation and distribution businesses. Generally, the liabilities of individual operating entities are non-recourse to the Parent Company and are isolated to the operating entities. Most of our operating entities are structured as limited liability entities, which limit the liability of shareholders. The structure is generally the same regardless of whether a subsidiary is consolidated under a voting or variable interest model. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("USU.S. GAAP").
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION — The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of The AES Corporation and its controlled subsidiaries. Furthermore, VIEs in which the Company has an ownership interest and is the primary beneficiary, thus controlling the VIE, have been consolidated. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Investments in entities where the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS — Noncontrolling interests are classified as a separate component of equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. Additionally, net income and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests are reflected separately from consolidated net income and comprehensive income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. Any change in ownership of a subsidiary while the controlling financial interest is retained is accounted for as an equity transaction between the controlling and noncontrolling interests (unless the transaction qualifies as a sale of in-substance real estate).interests. Losses continue to be attributed to the noncontrolling interests, even when the noncontrolling interests' basis has been reduced to zero.
Equity securities with redemption features that are not solely within the control of the issuer are classified outside of permanent equity. Generally, initial measurement will be at fair value. Subsequent measurement and classification vary depending on whether the instrument is probable of becoming redeemable. WhereWhen the equity instrument is not probable of becoming redeemable, subsequent allocation of income and dividends is classified in permanent equity. For those securities where it is probable that the instrument will become redeemable or that are currently redeemable, AES recognizes changes in the fair value at each accounting period against retained earnings or additional paid-in-capital in the absence of retained earnings, subject to the floor of the initial fair value. Further, the allocation of income and dividends, as well as the adjustment to fair value, is classified outside permanent equity. AmountsInstruments that are mandatorymandatorily redeemable are classified as a liability.
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS — Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and reported in Investments in and advances to affiliates on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of these companies is included in our results Net equity in earnings (losses) of operations.affiliates on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company utilizes the cumulative earning approach to determine whether distributions received from equity method investees are returns on investment or returns of investment. The Company discontinues the application of the equity method when an investment is reduced to zero and the Company is not otherwise committed to provide further financial support to the investee. The Company resumes the application of the equity method accounting to the extent that net income is greater than the share of net losses not previously recorded.
Upon acquiring the investment, we determine the fair value of the identifiable assets and assumed liabilities and the basis difference between each fair value and the carrying amount of the corresponding asset or liability in the financial statements of the investee. The AES share of the amortization of the basis difference is recognized in our net Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates in the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the life of the asset or liability.
The Company periodically assesses if impairment indicators exist at our equity method investments. When an impairment is observed, any excess of the carrying amount over its estimated fair value is recognized as impairment


128 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

expense when the loss in value is deemed other-than-temporary and included in Other non-operating expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
BUSINESS INTERESTS — Acquisitions and disposals of business interests are generally transactions pertaining to operational legal entities, which may be accounted for as a consolidated business, an asset, or an equity method investment. Losses on expected sales of business interests are limited to the impairment of long-lived assets as of the date of execution of the sales agreement, which are recognized in Asset impairment expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Any additional gains/(losses) on sales, which are primarily due to reclassification of cumulative translation adjustments, are recognized in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests in the Consolidated Statements of Operations upon completion of the sale.
ALLOCATION OF EARNINGS — Certain of the Company's businesses are subject to profit-sharing arrangements where the allocation of cash distributions and the sharing of tax benefits are not based on fixed

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

ownership percentages. These arrangements exist for certain U.S. renewable generation partnerships to designate different allocations of value among investors, where the allocations change in form or percentage over the life of the partnership. For these businesses, the Company uses the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method when it is a reasonable approximation of the profit-sharing arrangement. The HLBV method calculates the proceeds that would be attributable to each partner based on the liquidation provisions of the respective operating partnership agreement if the partnership was to be liquidated at book value at the balance sheet date. Each partner’s share of income in the period is equal to the change in the amount of net equity they are legally able to claim based on a hypothetical liquidation of the entity at the end of a reporting period compared to the beginning of that period, adjusted for any capital transactions.
The HLBV method is used both to allocate the equity earnings attributable to AES when the Company accounts for the renewable business as an equity method investment and to calculate the earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest when the business is consolidated by AES. Where, prior toIn the commencementearly months of operating activities foroperations of a respective renewable energygeneration facility where HLBV results in an immediatea significant decrease in the hypothetical liquidation proceeds attributable to the tax equity investor due to the recognition of ITCsinvestment tax credits ("ITCs") or other adjustments as required by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Company records the impact (sometimes referred to as the ‘Day one gain’) to income in the same period.
USE OF ESTIMATES USU.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the asset and liability balances reported as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Items subject to such estimates and assumptions include: the carrying amount and estimated useful lives of long-lived assets; asset retirement obligations; impairment of goodwill, long-lived assets and equity method investments; valuation allowances for receivables and deferred tax assets; the recoverability of regulatory assets; regulatory liabilities; the fair value of financial instruments; the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in aas business combination;combinations or as asset acquisitions by variable interest entities; contingent consideration arising from business combinations or asset acquisitions by variable interest entities; the measurement of equity method investments or noncontrolling interest using the HLBV method for certain renewable generation partnerships; pension liabilities; the incremental borrowing rates used in the determination of whether a sale of noncontrolling interests is considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate (as opposed to an equity transaction); pension liabilities; environmentallease liabilities; the impactdetermination of U.S. tax reform;lease and non-lease components in certain generation contracts; environmental liabilities; and potential litigation claims and settlements.
HELD-FOR-SALE BUSINESSES DISPOSAL GROUPS— A businessdisposal group classified as held-for-sale is reflected on the balance sheet at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. A loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the businessdisposal group exceeds its estimated fair value less cost to sell. This loss is limited to the carrying value of long livedlong-lived assets until the completion of the sale, at which point, any additional loss is recognized. If the fair value of the businessdisposal group subsequently exceeds the carrying amount while the businessdisposal group is still held-for-sale, any impairment expense previously recognized will be reversed up to the lowerlesser of the previously recognized expense or the subsequent excess.
Assets and liabilities related to a businessdisposal group classified as held-for-sale are segregated in the current balance sheet in the period in which the businessdisposal group is classified as held-for-sale. Assets and liabilities of held-for-sale businessesdisposal groups are classified as current when they are expected to be disposed of within twelve months. Transactions between the business held-for-sale disposal group and businesses that are expected to continue to exist after the disposal are not eliminated to appropriately reflect the continuing operations and balances held-for-sale. See Note 22—25—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.


129 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS — Discontinued operations reporting occurs only when the disposal of a business or a group of businesses represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. The Company reports financial results for discontinued operations separately from continuing operations to distinguish the financial impact of disposal transactions from ongoing operations. Prior period amounts in the statementConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheets are retrospectively revised to reflect the businesses determined to be discontinued operations. The cash flows of businesses that are determined to be discontinued operations are included within the relevant categories within operating, investing and financing activities on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. 
Transactions between the businesses determined to be discontinued operations and businesses that are expected to continue to exist after the disposal are not eliminated to appropriately reflect the continuing operations and balances held for sale.held-for-sale. The results of discontinued operations include any gain or loss recognized on closing or adjustment of the carrying amount to fair value less cost to sell, including gains or losses associated with

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

noncontrolling interests upon completion of the disposal transaction. Adjustments related to components previously reported as discontinued operations under prior accounting guidance are presented as discontinued operations in the current period even if the disposed-of component to which the adjustments are related would not meet the criteria for presentation as a discontinued operation under current guidance. See Note 21—24—Discontinued Operations for further information.
RECLASSIFICATIONS — To comply with newly adopted accounting standards, certain prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The recognition of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments resulted in a reclassification from Deferred income taxes to Retained earnings in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the year ended December 31, 2016. See further detail in the new accounting pronouncements discussion.
FAIR VALUE — Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly, hypothetical transaction between market participants at the measurement date, or exit price. The Company applies the fair value measurement accounting guidance to financial assets and liabilities in determining the fair value of investments in marketable debt and equity securities, included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet line items Short-term investments and Other noncurrent assets (noncurrent); derivative assets, included in Other current assets and Other noncurrent assets (noncurrent); and, derivative liabilities, included in Accrued and other liabilities (current) and Other long-termnoncurrent liabilities. The Company applies the fair value measurement guidance to nonfinancial assets and liabilities upon the acquisition of a business or an asset acquisition by a variable interest entity, or in conjunction with the measurement of an asset retirement obligation or a potential impairment loss on an asset group, equity method investments, or goodwill.
When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be reflected at their fair values, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance. The Company is prohibited from including transaction costs and any adjustments for blockage factors in determining fair value.
In determining fair value measurements, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Assets and liabilities are categorized within a fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilitiesliabilities;
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilitiesliabilities.
Any transfers between all levels within the fair value hierarchy levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — The Company considers unrestricted cash on hand, cash balances not restricted as to withdrawal or usage, deposits in banks, certificates of deposit and short-term marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
RESTRICTED CASH AND DEBT SERVICE RESERVES — Cash balances restricted as to withdrawal or usage, primarily via contract, are considered restricted cash.


130 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets that reconcile to the total of such amounts as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in millions):
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents$1,089 $1,029 
Restricted cash297 336 
Debt service reserves and other deposits441 207 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$1,827 $1,572 
INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES — The Company's marketable investments are primarily unsecured debentures, certificates of deposit, government debt securities and money market funds.
Short-term investments consist of marketable equity securities and debt securities with original maturities in excess of three months with remaining maturities of less than one year. Marketable debt securities where the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost.cost, net of any allowance for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326. Remaining marketable debt securities are classified as available-for-sale or trading and are carried at fair value.
Available-for-sale and trading investment's unrealizedUnrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities that are not credit-related are reflected in AOCL, a separate component of equity, and the Consolidated Statements of Operations, respectively ..respectively. Any credit-related impairments are recognized as an allowance with a corresponding impact recognized as a credit loss in Other Expense. Unrealized gains or losses on equity investments are reported in Other income. Interest and dividends on investments are reported in interestInterest income and otherOther income, respectively. Gains and losses on sales of investments are determined using the specific identification method.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS — Accounts and notes receivable are carried at amortized cost. The Company periodically assesses the collectability of accounts receivable, considering factors such as historical collection experience, the age of accounts receivable and other currently available evidence supporting collectability, and records an allowance for doubtful accounts in accordance with ASC 326 for the estimated uncollectible amount as appropriate. Credit losses on accounts and notes receivable are generally recognized in Cost of Sales. Certain of our businesses charge interest on accounts receivable. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. When collection of such interest is not reasonably assured, interest income is recognized as cash is received. Individual accounts and notes receivable are written off when they are no longer deemed collectible.
INVENTORY — Inventory primarily consists of fuel and other raw materials used to generate power, and operational spare parts and supplies used to maintain power generation and distribution facilities. Inventory is carried at lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is the sum of the purchase price and expenditures incurred to bring the inventory to its existing location. Inventory is primarily valued using the average cost method. Generally, if it is expected fuel inventory will not be recovered through revenue earned from power generation, an impairment is recognized to reflect the fuel at marketnet realizable value. The carrying amount of spare parts and supplies is typically reduced only in instances where the items are considered obsolete.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS — Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, assets under capitalfinance leases and intangible assets subject to amortization (i.e., finite-lived intangible assets).
Property, plant and equipment — Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The cost of renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment are capitalized.
Construction progress payments, engineering costs, insurance costs, salaries, interest and other costs directly relating to construction in progress are capitalized during the construction period, provided the completion of the construction project is deemed probable, or expensed at the time construction completion is determined to no longer be probable. The continued capitalization of such costs is subject to risks related to successful completion, including those related to government approvals, site identification, financing, construction permitting and contract compliance. Construction-in-progress balances are transferred to electric generation and distribution assets when an asset group is ready for its intended use. Government subsidies, liquidated damages recovered for construction delays, and income tax credits are recorded as a reduction to property, plant and equipment and reflected in cash flows from investing activities. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.


131 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Depreciation, after consideration of salvage value and asset retirement obligations, is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are determined on a composite or component basis. Capital spare parts, including rotable spare parts, are included in electric generation and distribution assets. If the spare part is considered a component, it is depreciated over its useful life after the part is placed in service. If the spare part is deemed part of a composite asset, the part is depreciated over the composite useful life even when being held as a spare part.
TheCertain of the Company's Brazilian subsidiaries operate under concession contracts. Certain estimates are utilized to determine depreciation expense for the Brazilian subsidiaries, including the useful lives of the property, plant and equipment and the amounts to be recovered at the end of the concession contract. The amounts to be recovered under these concession contracts are based on estimates that are inherently uncertain and actual amounts recovered may differ from those estimates. These concession contracts are not within the scope of ASC 853—Service Concession Arrangements.
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization — Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives which range from 31 – 50 years. years and are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet line item Other intangible assets. The Company accounts for purchased emission allowances as intangible assets and records an expense when they are utilized or sold. Granted emission allowances are valued at zero.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Impairment of Long-lived Assets — When circumstances indicate the carrying amount of long-lived assets in a held-for-use asset group may not be recoverable, the Company evaluates the assets for potential impairment using internal projections of undiscounted cash flows resulting from the use and eventual disposal of the assets. Events or changes in circumstances that may necessitate a recoverability evaluation include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, unfavorable changes in power prices or fuel costs, increased competition due to additional capacity in the grid, technological advancements, declining trends in demand, or an expectation it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment expense is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value (subject to the carrying amount not being reduced below fair value for any individual long-lived asset that is determinable without undue cost and effort). An impairment expense for certain assets may be reduced by the establishment of a regulatory asset if recovery through approved rates is probable.
SERVICE CONCESSION ASSETS — Service concession assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization, in accordance with ASC 853. Service concession assets represent the cost of all infrastructure to be transferred to the public-sector entity grantors at the end of the concession. These costs primarily represent construction progress payments, engineering costs, insurance costs, salaries, interest and other costs directly relating to construction of the service concession infrastructure. Government subsidies, liquidated damages recovered for construction delays and income tax credits are recorded as a reduction to Service Concession Assets. Service concession assets are amortized and recognized in earnings as a cost of goods sold as infrastructure construction revenue is recognized. Services provided under concession arrangements are recognized on a straight line basis.
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS — Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are deferred and presented as a direct reduction from the face amount of that debt and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit or revolving credit facility are deferred and presented as an asset and amortized over the related financing period. Make-whole payments in connection with early debt retirements are classified as cash flows used in financing activities.
GOODWILL AND INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS — The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances necessitate an evaluation for impairment. The Company's annual impairment testing date is October first.1st.
Goodwill — Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of the business acquisition over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill resulting from an acquisition is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. Generally, each AES business with a goodwill balance constitutes a reporting unit as they are not similar to other businesses in a segment nor are they reported to segment management together with other businesses.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment either under the qualitative assessment option or the two-step quantitative test.test option to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. If goodwill is determined to be impaired, an impairment loss measured at the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, of individual assets and liabilities is determinednot to compute the implied fair value of goodwill. Ifexceed the carrying amount of goodwill, exceeds its implied fair value, the excess is recognized as an impairment loss up to the carrying amount of the goodwill.recorded.
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets — The Company's indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily include land-use rights and water rights. Indefinite-lived Intangible Assetsintangible assets are evaluated for impairment either under the qualitative assessment option or the two-step quantitative test. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset being tested for impairment exceeds its fair value, the excess is recognized as impairment expense.


132 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES — Accounts payable consists of amounts due to trade creditors related to the Company's core business operations. These payables include amounts owed to vendors and suppliers for items such as energy purchased for resale, fuel, maintenance, inventory and other raw materials. Other accrued liabilities include items such as income taxes, regulatory liabilities, legal contingencies and employee-related costs, including payroll, benefits and related taxes.benefits.
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — The Company recognizes assets and liabilities that result from regulated ratemaking processes. Regulatory assets generally represent incurred costs which have been deferred due to the probable future recovery via customer rates. Generally, returns earned on regulatory assets are reflected in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations within Interest Income. Regulatory liabilities generally represent

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

obligations to refund customers. Management continually assesses whether regulatory assets are probable of future recovery and regulatory liabilities are probable of future payment by considering factors such as applicable regulatory changes, recent rate orders applicable to other regulated entities, and the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation. If future recovery of costs previously deferred ceases to be probable, the related regulatory assets are written off and recognized in income from continuing operations.
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT PLANS — The Company recognizes in its Consolidated Balance Sheets an asset or liability reflecting the funded status of pension and other postretirement plans with current-year changes in actuarial gains or losses recognized in AOCL, except for those plans at certain of the Company's regulated utilities that can recover portions of their pension and postretirement obligations through future rates. All plan assets are recorded at fair value. AES follows the measurement date provisions of the accounting guidance, which require a year-end measurement date of plan assets and obligations for all defined benefit plans.
INCOME TAXES — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of the existing assets and liabilities, and their respective income tax bases.basis. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company's tax positions are evaluated under a more likely than not recognition threshold and measurement analysis before they are recognized for financial statement reporting.
Uncertain tax positions have been classified as noncurrent income tax liabilities unless expected to be paid within one year. The Company's policy for interest and penalties related to income tax exposures is to recognize interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has not yet determinedelected to treat GILTI as an expense in the period in which the tax is accrued. Accordingly, no deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded related to GILTI.
The Company applies the flow-through method to account for its accounting policy election, as outlined by SAB 118, with respect to the new GILTI provisions of U.S.investment tax reform, applicable from January 1, 2018. See Note 20—Income Taxesfor additional discussion regarding the U.S. tax reform.credits.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS — The Company records the fair value of a liability for a legal obligation to retire an asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. When a new liability is recognized, the Company capitalizes the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the obligation, the Company eliminates the liability and, based on the actual cost to retire, may incur a gain or loss.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION — A business's functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the business operates and is generally the currency in which the business generates and expends cash. Subsidiaries and affiliates whose functional currency is a currency other than the U.S. dollar translate their assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rates in effect at the end of the fiscal period. Adjustments arising from the translation of the balance sheet of such subsidiaries are included in AOCL. The revenue and expense accounts of such subsidiaries and affiliates are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates for the period. Gains and losses on intercompany foreign currency transactions that are long-term in nature and which the Company does not intend to settle in the foreseeable future, are also recognized in AOCL. Gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in determining net income. Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified from AOCL to net income only when realized upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment in a foreign entity. The accumulated adjustments are included in


133 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

carrying amounts in impairment assessments where the Company has committed to a plan that will cause the accumulated adjustments to be reclassified to earnings.
REVENUE RECOGNITION — Revenue is earned from the sale of electricity from our utilities and the production and sale of electricity and capacity from our generation facilities. Revenue is recognized upon the transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue is recorded net of any taxes assessed on and collected from customers, which are remitted to the governmental authorities.
UtilitiesOur utilities sell electricity directly to end-users, such as homes and businesses, and bill customers directly. The majority of our utility contracts have a single performance obligation, as the promises to transfer energy, capacity, and other distribution and/or transmission services are not distinct. Additionally, as the performance obligation is satisfied over time as energy is delivered, and the same method is used to measure progress, the performance obligation meets the criteria to be considered a series. Utility revenue is classified as regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In exchange for the right to sell or distribute electricity in a service territory, our utility businesses are subject to government regulation. This regulation sets the framework for the prices (“tariffs”) that our utilities are allowed to charge customers for electricity. Since tariffs are determined by the regulator, the price that our utilities have the right to bill corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the utility's performance completed in each period. The Company also has some month-to-month contracts. Revenue under these contracts is recognized using an output method measured by the MWh delivered each month, which best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer, at the approved tariff.
The Company has businesses where it sells and purchases power to and from ISOs and RTOs. Our utility businesses generally purchase power to satisfy the demand of customers that is not contracted through separate PPAs. In these instances, the Company accounts for these transactions on a net hourly basis because the transactions are settled on a net hourly basis. In limited situations, a utility customer may choose to receive generation services from a third-party provider, in which case the Company may serve as a billing agent for the provider and recognize revenue on a net basis.
Generation — Most of our generation fleet sells electricity under contracts to customers such as utilities, industrial users, and other intermediaries. Our generation contracts, based on specific facts and circumstances, can have one or more performance obligations as the promise to transfer energy, capacity, and other services may or may not be distinct depending on the nature of the market and terms of the contract. As the performance obligations are generally satisfied over time and use the same method to measure progress, the performance obligations meet the criteria to be considered a series. In measuring progress toward satisfaction of a performance obligation, the Company applies the "right to invoice" practical expedient when available, and recognizes revenue in the amount to which the Company has a right to consideration from a customer that corresponds directly with the value of the performance completed to date. Revenue from generation businesses is classified as non-regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For contracts determined to have multiple performance obligations, we allocate revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price using a market or expected cost plus margin approach. Additionally, the Company allocates variable consideration to one or more, but not all, distinct goods or services that form part of a single performance obligation when (1) the variable consideration relates specifically to the efforts to transfer the distinct good or service and (2) the variable consideration depicts the amount to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised good or service to the customer.
Revenue from generation contracts is recognized using an output method, as energy and capacity delivered best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer. Performance obligations including energy or ancillary services (such as operations and maintenance and dispatch services) are generally measured by the MWh delivered. Capacity, which is a stand-ready obligation to deliver energy when required by the customer, is measured using MWs. In certain contracts, if plant availability exceeds a contractual target, the Company may receive a performance bonus payment, or if the plant availability falls below a guaranteed minimum target, we may incur a non-availability penalty. Such bonuses or penalties represent a form of variable consideration and are estimated and recognized when it is probable that there will not be a significant reversal.
In assessing whether variable quantities are considered variable consideration or an option to acquire additional goods and services, the Company evaluates the nature of the promise and the legally enforceable rights


134 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

in the contract. In some contracts, such as requirement contracts, the legally enforceable rights merely give the customer a right to purchase additional goods and services which are distinct. In these contracts, the customer's action results in a new obligation, and the variable quantities are considered an option.
When energy or capacity is sold or purchased in the spot market or to ISOs, the Company assesses the facts and circumstances to determine gross versus net presentation of spot revenues and purchases. Generally, the nature of the performance obligation is to sell surplus energy or capacity above contractual commitments, or to purchase energy or capacity to satisfy deficits. Generally, on an hourly basis, a generator is either a net seller or a net buyer in terms of the amount of energy or capacity transacted with the ISO. In these situations, the Company recognizes revenue for the hours where the generator is a net seller and cost of sales for the hours where the generator is a net buyer.
Certain generation contracts contain operating leases where capacity payments are generally considered lease elements. In such cases, the allocation between the lease and non-lease elements is made at the inception of the lease following the guidance in ASC 842.
The transaction price allocated to a construction performance obligation is recognized as revenue over time as construction activity occurs, with revenue being fully recognized upon completion of construction. These contracts may include a difference in timing between revenue recognition and the collection of cash receipts, which may be collected over the term of the entire arrangement. The timing difference could result in a significant financing component for the construction performance obligation if determined to be a material component of the transaction price. The Company accounts for a significant financing component under the effective interest rate method, recognizing a long-term receivable for the expected future payments related to the construction performance obligation in the Loan Receivable line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As payments are collected from the customer over the term of the contract, consideration related to the construction performance obligation is bifurcated between the principal repayment of the long-term receivable and the related interest income, recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revenue
Contract Balances — The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in accounts receivable and contract liabilities. Accounts receivable represent unconditional rights to consideration and consist of both billed amounts and unbilled amounts typically resulting from sales under long-term contracts when revenue recognized exceeds the sale of energy is recognized inamount billed to the period during which the sale occurs.customer. We bill both generation and utilities customers on a contractually agreed-upon schedule, typically at periodic intervals (e.g., monthly). The calculation of revenue earned but not yet billed is based on the number of days not billed in the month, the estimated amount of energy delivered during those days and the estimated average price per customer class for that month. Differences between actual
Our contract liabilities consist of deferred revenue which is classified as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue. The current portion of our contract liabilities is reported in Accrued and estimated unbilled revenue are usually immaterial.other liabilities and the noncurrent portion is reported in Other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Remaining Performance Obligations — The transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations represents future consideration for unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations at the end of the reporting period. The Company has businesses where it sellselected to apply the optional disclosure exemptions under ASC 606. Therefore, the amount disclosed in Note 20—Revenueexcludes contracts with an original length of one year or less, contracts for which we recognize revenue based on the amount we have the right to invoice for services performed, and purchases powervariable consideration allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation when the consideration relates specifically to our efforts to satisfy the performance obligation and depicts the amount to which we expect to be entitled. As such, consideration for energy is excluded from ISOsthe amount disclosed as the variable consideration relates to the amount of energy delivered and RTOs. In those instances,reflects the value the Company accountsexpects to receive for these transactionsthe energy transferred. Estimates of revenue expected to be recognized in future periods also exclude unexercised customer options to purchase additional goods or services that do not represent material rights to the customer.
LEASES — The Company has operating and finance leases for energy production facilities, land, office space, transmission lines, vehicles and other operating equipment in which the Company is the lessee. Operating leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, but are expensed on a net hourlystraight-line basis becauseover the transactionslease term. The Company’s leases do not contain any material residual value guarantees, restrictive covenants or subleases.


135 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term while lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are settledrecognized on a net hourly basis.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Revenue from generation businesses is classified as non-regulatedcommencement of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Generally, the rate implicit in the Consolidated Statementslease is not readily determinable; as such, we use the subsidiaries’ incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of Operations. Revenuelease payments. The Company determines discount rates based on its existing credit rates of its unsecured borrowings, which are then adjusted for the appropriate lease term and currency. The right-of-use asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives that are paid or payable to the lessee at commencement. The lease term includes the option to extend or terminate the lease if it is recognized based uponreasonably certain that the option will be exercised.
The Company has operating leases for certain generation contracts that contain provisions to provide capacity to a customer, which is a stand-ready obligation to deliver energy when required by the customer in which the Company is the lessor. Capacity payments are generally considered lease elements as they cover the majority of available output deliveredfrom a facility. The allocation of contract payments between the lease and capacity provided,non-lease elements is made at rates as specified under contract terms or prevailing market rates. Certainthe inception of the Company's PPAs meet the definition of an operating lease or contain similar arrangements. Typically, minimumlease. Fixed lease payments from such PPAscontracts are recognized as lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term, whereas contingent rentalsvariable lease payments are recognized when earned. Revenue
The Company has sales-type leases for BESS in which the Company is recordedthe lessor. These arrangements allow customers the ability to determine when to charge and discharge the BESS, representing the transfer of control and constitutes the arrangement as a sales-type lease. Upon commencement of the lease, the book value of the leased asset is removed from the balance sheet and a net investment in sales-type lease is recognized based on the present value of any taxes assessed onfixed payments under the contract and collected from customers, which are remitted to the governmental authorities.residual value of the underlying asset.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION — The Company grants share-based compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and performance cash units. The expense is based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instrument issued and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to its employees.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES — General and administrative expenses include corporate and other expenses related to corporate staff functions and initiatives, primarily executive management, finance, legal, human resources and information systems, which are not directly allocable to our business segments. Additionally, all costs associated with corporate business development efforts are classified as general and administrative expenses.
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES — Under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, the Company recognizes all contracts that meet the definition of a derivative, except those designated as normal purchase or normal sale at inception, as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. See the Company's fair value policy and Note 4—5—Fair Value and Fair value in this section for additional discussion regarding the determination of fair value.
PPAs and fuel supply agreements are evaluated to assess if they contain either a derivative or an embedded derivative requiring separate valuation and accounting. Generally, these agreements do not meet the definition of a derivative, often due to the inability to be net settled. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the markets for commodities to be delivered under these agreements to determine if facts and circumstances have changed such that the agreements could be net settled and meet the definition of a derivative.
The Company typically designates its derivative instruments as cash flow hedges if they meet the criteria specified in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge the variability of expected future cash interest payments. Foreign currency contracts are used to reduce risks arising from the change in fair value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. The objective of these practices is to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on operating results. The Company also enters into commodity contracts to economically hedge price variability inherent in electricity sales arrangements. The objectives of the commodity contracts are to minimize the impact of variability in spot electricity prices and stabilize estimated revenue streams. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
For our hedges, changes in fair value that are considered highly effective are deferred in AOCL and are recognized into earnings as the hedged transactions affect earnings. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings immediately. If a derivative is no longer highly effective, hedge accounting will be discontinued prospectively. For cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions, AES estimates the future cash flows of the forecasted transactions and evaluates the probability of the occurrence and timing of such transactions.


136 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings. Regardless of when gains or losses on derivatives are recognized in earnings, they are generally classified as interest expense for interest rate and cross-currency derivatives, foreign currency transaction gains or losses for foreign currency derivatives, and non-regulated revenue or non-regulated cost of sales for commodity and other derivatives. Cash flows arising from derivatives are included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as an operating activity given the nature of the underlying risk being economically hedged and the lack of significant financing elements, except that cash flows on designated and qualifying hedges of variable-rate interest during construction are classified as an investing activity. The Company has elected not to offset net derivative positions in the financial statements.
CREDIT LOSSES In accordance with ASC 326, the Company records an allowance for current expected credit losses (“CECL”) for accounts and notes receivable, financing receivables, contract assets, net investments in leases recognized as a lessor, held-to-maturity debt securities, financial guarantees related to the non-payment of a financial obligation, and off-balance sheet credit exposures not accounted for as insurance. The CECL allowance is based on the asset's amortized cost and reflects management's expected risk of credit losses over the remaining contractual life of the asset. CECL allowances are estimated using relevant information about the collectibility of cash flows and consider information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions. See New Accounting Pronouncements below for further information regarding the impact on the Company's financial statements upon adoption of ASC 326.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that had and/or could have a materialan impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

or are expected todid not have noa material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Standards Adopted
ASU Number and NameDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on the financial statements upon adoption
2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment AccountingThe standard simplifies the following aspects of accounting for share-based payments awards: accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification of employee taxes paid on statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes.
Transition method: The recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies arising from vesting or settlement were applied retrospectively. The elimination of the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before they are recognized was adopted on a modified retrospective basis.
January 1, 2017The recognition of excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the period when the awards vest or are settled, rather than in paid-in-capital in the period when the excess tax benefits are realized, resulted in a decrease of $31 million to deferred tax liabilities, offset by an increase to retained earnings. 
New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective
ASU Number and NameDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on the financial statements upon adoption
2018-02, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from AOCIThis amendment allows a reclassification of the stranded tax effects resulting from the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from AOCI to retained earnings. Because this amendment only relates to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected.January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
The standard updates the hedge accounting model to expand the ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components, reduce complexity, and ease certain documentation and assessment requirements. When facts and circumstances are the same as at the previous quantitative test, a subsequent quantitative effectiveness test is not required. The standard also eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. For cash flow hedges, this means that the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument will be recorded in other comprehensive income and amounts deferred will be reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item.
Transition method: modified retrospective with the cumulative effect adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date. Prospective for presentation and disclosures.
January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling InterestsPart 1 of this standard changes the classification of certain equity-linked financial instruments when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock.
Transition method: retrospective.
January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2017-08, Receivables — Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt SecuritiesThis standard shortens the period of amortization for the premium on certain callable debt securities to the earliest call date.
Transition method: modified retrospective.
January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2017-05, Other Income — Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610-20)This standard clarifies the scope and application of ASC 610-20 on the sale, transfer, and derecognition of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to non-customers, including partial sales. It also clarifies that the derecognition of businesses is under scope of ASC 810. The standard must be adopted concurrently with ASC 606, however an entity will not have to apply the same transition method as ASC 606.
Transition method: full or modified retrospective.

Under a modified retrospective approach, the guidance shall be applied to all contracts that are not completed as of the initial application date (January 1, 2018). The Company has identified contracts executed during Q4 2017 that would not be completed as of this date and is in the process of assessing those under the new standard. However, no adjustment is expected as of the initial application date.
January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted only as of January 1, 2017.The Company does not expect any impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption of the standard, will adopt the standard on January 1, 2018, and plans to use the modified retrospective approach.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill ImpairmentThis standard simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by removing the requirement to calculate the implied fair value. Instead, it requires that an entity records an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value.
Transition method: prospective.
January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted as of January 1, 2017.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
The standard requires an entity to first evaluate whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, and if that threshold is met, the set is not a business. As a second step, to be considered a business at least one substantive process should exist. The revised definition of a business will reduce the number of transactions that are accounted for as business combinations.
Transition Method: prospective.
January 1, 2018.
Early adoption is permitted.
This revised definition will reduce the number of transactions that are accounted for as a business, therefore, acquisitions and disposition would fall under a different accounting model.
2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)This standard requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
Transition method: retrospective.
January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted.The Company has performed a preliminary evaluation and expects an increase in cash provided by operating activities of approximately $5 million for 2017 and 2016 and a decrease of $5 million in 2015. Net cash used in investing activities are expected to decrease by approximately $150 million and $230 million for 2017 and 2015, respectively, with an increase of $10 million expected for 2016.
2016-13, 2018-19, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2020-02, 2020-03, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
The standard updates the impairment model for financial assets measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses as it is done today, except that the losses will be recognized as an allowance rather than a reduction in the amortized cost of the securities.
Transition method: various.
January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted only as of January 1, 2019.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2016-02, 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842)See discussion of the ASU below.

January 1, 2019. Early2020See impact upon adoption is permitted.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements and intends to adopt the standard as of January 1, 2019.below.
2014-09, 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12, 2016-20, 2017-10, 2017-13, Revenue from Contracts with Customers2016-02, 2018-01, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-20, 2019-01, Leases (Topic 606)842)See discussion of the ASU below.January 1, 2018. Early2019See impact upon adoption is permitted only as of January 1, 2017.The Company will adopt the standard below.
2016-02, 2018-01, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-20, 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842)ASC 842 was adopted by sPower on January 1, 2018; see below for2020. sPower was not required to adopt ASC 842 using the evaluationpublic adoption date, as sPower is an equity method investee that meets the definition of a public business entity only by virtue of the impactinclusion of its summarized financial information in the Company’s SEC filings.January 1, 2020The adoption onof this standard resulted in a $4 million decrease to accumulated deficit attributable to the consolidated financial statements.AES Corporation stockholders’ equity.
ASU 2014-09ASC 326 Financial Instruments Credit Losses
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASC 326 Financial Instruments — Credit Losses and its subsequent corresponding updates provides(“ASC 326”). The new standard updates the principlesimpairment model for financial assets measured at amortized cost, known as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments, entities are required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model that generally results in the earlier recognition of an entity must applyallowance for credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities measure credit losses as it was done under previous GAAP, except that unrealized losses due to measure and recognize revenue. The core principle is thatcredit-related factors are now recognized as an entity shall recognize revenueallowance on the balance sheet with a corresponding adjustment to depictearnings in the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Amendments to the standard were issued that provide further clarification of the principle and to provide certain transition expedients. The standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP.income statement.
The standard requires retrospective application and allows either a full retrospective adoption in which all ofCompany applied the periods are presented under the new standard or a modified retrospective approach in whichmethod of adoption for ASC 326. Under this transition method, the cumulative effect of initially applyingCompany applied the guidance is recognizedtransition provisions starting at the date of initial application.adoption. The cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 326 on our January 1, 2020 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows (in millions):
In 2016,


137 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
Balance at
December 31, 2019
Adjustments Due to ASC 326
Balance at
January 1, 2020
Assets
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $20$1,479 $$1,479 
Other current assets (1)
802 (2)800 
Deferred income taxes156 165 
Loan receivable, net of allowance of $32 (2)
1,351 (32)1,319 
Other noncurrent assets (3)
1,635 (30)1,605 
Liabilities and Equity
Accumulated deficit$(692)$(39)$(731)
Noncontrolling interests2,233 (16)2,217 
_________________________
(1)Other current assets include the Company established a cross-functional implementation team andshort-term portion of the Mong Duong loan receivable, which was reclassified to Current held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020.
(2)Loan receivable at Mong Duong was reclassified to Noncurrent held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020.
(3)Other noncurrent assets include Argentina financing receivables.
Mong Duong — The Mong Duong II power plant in Vietnam is the primary driver of changes in the process of evaluating changes to our business processes, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosurecredit reserves under the new standard. AtThis plant is operated under a build, operate, and transfer (“BOT”) contract and will be transferred to the Vietnamese government after the completion of a 25-year PPA. A loan receivable was recognized in 2018 upon the adoption of ASC 606 in order to account for the future expected payments for the construction performance obligation portion of the BOT contract. As the payments for the construction performance obligation occur over a 25-year term, a significant financing element was determined to exist which is accounted for under the effective interest rate method. Historically, the Company has not incurred any losses on this time, we do not expect any significant impactarrangement, of which no directly comparable assets exist in the market. In order to determine expected credit losses under ASC 326 arising from this $1.4 billion loan receivable as of January 1, 2020, the Company considered average historical default and recovery rates on our financial systems orsimilarly rated sovereign bonds, which formed an initial basis for developing a material changeprobability of default, net of expected recoveries, to controlsbe applied as a key credit quality indicator for this arrangement. A resulting estimated loss rate of 2.4% was applied to the weighted-average remaining life of the loan receivable, after adjustments for certain asset-specific characteristics, including the Company’s status as a large foreign direct investor in Vietnam, Mong Duong’s status as critical energy infrastructure in Vietnam, and cash flows from the operations of the plant, which are under the Company’s control until the end of the BOT contract. As a result of this analysis, the implementationCompany recognized an opening CECL reserve of $34 million as an adjustment to Accumulated deficit and Noncontrolling interests as of January 1, 2020.
Argentina — Exposure toCAMMESA, the administrator of the new revenue recognition standard.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Givenwholesale energy market in Argentina, is the complexity and diversitydriver of our non-regulated arrangements, the Company is assessing the standard on a contract by contract basis applying the interpretations reached during 2017 on key issues. These include the application of the practical expedient for measuring progress toward satisfaction of a performance obligation, when variable quantities would be considered variable consideration versus an option to acquire additional goods and services, how to allocate variable consideration to one or more, but not all, distinct goods or services promisedcredit reserves in a series of distinct goods or services that forms part of a single performance obligation. Additionally,Argentina. As discussed in Note 7Financing Receivables, the Company has been workingcredit exposures through the FONINVEMEM Agreements, other agreements related to resolutions passed by the Argentine government in which AES Argentina will receive compensation for investments in new generation plants and technologies, as well as regular accounts receivable balances. The timing of collections depends on the applicationcorresponding agreements and collectability of these receivables are assessed on an ongoing basis.
Collection of the standardprincipal and interest on these receivables is subject to contractsvarious business risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the continued operation of power plants which generate cash for payments of these receivables, regulatory changes that could impact the timing and amount of collections, and economic conditions in Argentina. The Company monitors these risks, including the credit ratings of the Argentine government, on a quarterly basis to assess the collectability of these receivables. Historically, the Company has not incurred any credit-related losses on these receivables. In order to determine expected credit losses under ASC 326, the Company considered historical default probabilities utilizing similarly rated sovereign bonds and historic recovery rates for Argentine government bond defaults. This information formed an initial basis for developing a probability of default, net of expected recoveries, to be applied as a key credit quality indicator across the underlying financing receivables. A resulting estimated weighted average loss rate of 41.2% was applied to the remaining balance of these receivables, after adjustments for certain asset-specific characteristics, including AES Argentina’s role in providing critical energy infrastructure to Argentina, our history of collections on these receivables, and the average term that the receivables are expected to be outstanding. As a result of this analysis, the Company recognized an opening CECL reserve of $29 million as an adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2020.
Other financial assetsApplication of ASC 326 to the Company’s $1.5 billion of trade accounts receivable and $326 million of available-for-sale debt securities at January 1, 2020 did not result in any material adjustments, primarily due to the short-term duration and high turnover of these financial assets. Additionally, a large portion of


138 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

our trade accounts receivables and amounts reserved for doubtful accounts under legacy GAAP arise from arrangements accounted for as an operating lease under ASC 842, which are excluded from the scope of Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853) and assessingASC 326.
As discussed in Note 7Financing Receivables, AES Gener recorded $33 million of noncurrent receivables at December 31, 2019 pertaining to revenues recognized on regulated energy contracts that were impacted by the gross versus net presentation for spot energy sales and purchases. Through this assessment,Stabilization Fund created by the Company to date has identified limited situations where revenue recognized under ASC 606 could differ from that recognized under ASC 605 and where the presentation of sales to and purchases from the energy spot markets will change.
Chilean government in October 2019. The cumulative effect of applying the new standard that the Company expects to recognize atcollect these noncurrent receivables through the dateexecution of initial application is mainly relatedsale agreements with third parties. However, given the investment grade rating of Chile and the history of zero credit losses for regulated customers, management determined that no incremental CECL reserves were required to a contractbe recognized as of January 1, 2020.
The following table represents the rollforward of the allowance for credit losses from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 (in millions):
Rollforward of CECL Reserves by Portfolio SegmentReserve at January 1, 2020Current Period ProvisionWrite-offs charged against allowanceRecoveries CollectedForeign ExchangeReserve at December 31, 2020
Accounts Receivable (1)
$$11 $(9)$$$
Mong Duong Loan Receivable (2)
34 (2)32 
Argentina Receivables29 (1)(9)20 
Other
Total CECL Reserves$68 $12 $(9)$$(9)$62 
_____________________________
(1)Excludes operating lease receivable allowances and contractual dispute allowances of $16 million and $4 million as of January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Those reserves are not in scope under ASC 326.
(2)Mong Duong Loan Receivable credit losses allowance was reclassified toheld-for-sale assetson the scopeConsolidated Balance Sheet as of Topic 853. For this contract,December 31, 2020.
ASC 842 Leases
On January 1, 2019, the Company has concluded that revenue recognized since the inception of the agreement would be higher through January 1, 2018 underadopted ASC 606. This will result in a decrease to the opening balance of Accumulated deficit of approximately $60 million and Accumulated other comprehensive loss of approximately $20 million, and an increase to the opening balance of Noncontrolling interest of approximately $80 million. Additionally, the application of ASC 606 will result in a reclassification from Service concession assets to Other noncurrent assets of $1,360 million. Given the limited impact, the Company expects to use the modified retrospective approach.
We are continuing to work with various non-authoritative industry groups, and monitoring the FASB and Transition Resource Group activity.
ASU 2016-02842 Leases and its subsequent corresponding updates require(“ASC 842”). Under this standard, lessees are required to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases buton the balance sheet, and recognize expenses in a manner similar to today’s accounting.the prior accounting method. For Lessors,lessors, the guidance modifies the lease classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. The guidance also eliminates today’sprevious real estate-specific provisions.
The standard must be adopted usingUnder ASC 842, fewer of our contracts contain a modified retrospective approach atlease. However, due to the beginningelimination of the earliest comparative period presentedreal estate-specific guidance and changes to certain lessor classification criteria, more leases qualify as sales-type leases and direct financing leases. Under these two models, a lessor derecognizes the asset and recognizes a lease receivable. According to ASC 842, the net investment in the financial statements (January 1, 2017). The FASB proposed amendinglease includes the standard to give another option for transition. The proposed transition method would allow entities to not apply the new lease standardfair value of residual interest in the comparative periods presented in their financial statementsasset after the contract period as well as the present value of the fixed lease payments, but does not include any variable payments under the lease. Therefore, the net investment in the yearlease could be significantly different than the carrying amount of adoption. Under the proposed transition method,underlying asset at lease commencement. In such circumstances, the entity would applydifference between the transition provisions on January 1, 2019 (i.e.,initially recognized net investment in the effective date). At transition, lesseslease and lessors are permitted to make an election to applythe carrying amount of the underlying asset is recognized as a gain/loss at lease commencement.
During the course of adopting ASC 842, the Company applied various practical expedients including:
The package of practical expedients (applied to all leases) that allow themallowed lessees and lessors not to reassess: (1)
a.whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2)
b.lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3)
c.whether initial direct costs for any expired or existing leases qualify for capitalization under ASC 842. These three
The transition practical expedients must be elected as a packageexpedient related to land easements, allowing us to carry forward our accounting treatment for land easements on existing agreements, and must be consistently
The transition practical expedient for lessees that allowed businesses to not separate lease and non-lease components. The Company applied the practical expedient to all leases. Furthermore, entities are also permitted to make an election to use hindsightclasses of underlying assets when determiningvaluing right-of-use assets and lease term and lessees can elect to use hindsight when assessing the impairment of right-of-use assets.
The Company has established a task force focused on the identification of contracts that would be under the scope of the new standard and on the assessment and measurement of the right-of-use asset and related liability. Additionally, the implementation team has been working on the identification and selection of a lease accounting system that would support the implementation and the subsequent accounting. The implementation team is in the process of evaluating changes to our business processes, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosure under the new standard.
As the Company has preliminarily concluded that at transition it would be using the package of practical expedients, the main impact expected as of the effective date is the recognition of the right to use asset and the related liability in the financial statements for all those contracts that contain a lease and for whichliabilities. Contracts where the Company is the lessee. However, income statement presentationlessor were separated between the lease and non-lease components.


139 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The Company applied the expense recognition pattern will not change.
modified retrospective method of adoption and elected to continue to apply the guidance in ASC 840 Leases to the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption. Under this transition method, the Company applied the transition provisions starting at the date of adoption. The cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 842 it is expected that fewer contracts will contain a lease. However,on our January 1, 2019 Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows (in millions):
Consolidated Balance SheetBalance at December 31, 2018Adjustments Due to ASC 842Balance at January 1, 2019
Assets
Other noncurrent assets$1,514 $253 $1,767 
Liabilities
Accrued and other liabilities962 27 989 
Other noncurrent liabilities2,723 226 2,949 
The primary impact of adoption was due to the eliminationrecognition of today's real estate-specific guidancea right-of-use-asset and changes to certain lessor classification criteria, more leases will qualify as sales-type leaseslease liability for an operating land lease in Panama associated with the Colon LNG power plant and direct financing leases. Under these two models,regasification terminal.
New Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective The following table provides a lessor will derecognize the asset and will recognizebrief description of recent accounting pronouncements that could have a lease receivable. According to ASC 842, the lease receivable does not include variable payments that dependmaterial impact on the use of the asset (e.g. Mwh produced by a facility). Therefore, the lease receivable couldCompany’s consolidated financial statements once adopted. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to be lower than the carrying amount of the underlying asset at lease commencement, In such circumstances, the difference

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

between the initially recognized lease receivable and the carrying amount of the underlying asset is recognized as a selling loss at lease commencement. The Company is assessing how this guidance will applyeither not applicable or are expected to new renewable contracts executed or modified after the effective date where all the payments are contingenthave no material impact on the level of production and is also evaluating the related impact to HLBV accounting.Company’s consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective
ASU Number and NameDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on the financial statements upon adoption
2020-06, Debt - Debt with conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Equity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Equity’s Own EquityThe amendments in this update affect entities that issue convertible instruments and/or contracts indexed to and potentially settled in an entity’s own equity. The new ASU eliminates the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models for convertible instruments. It also amends the accounting for certain contracts in an entity’s own equity that are currently accounted for as derivatives because of specific settlement provisions. In addition, the new guidance modifies how particular convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted EPS computation.For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2020-04 and 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial ReportingThe amendments in these updates provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference to LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued by reference rate reform, and clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. These amendments are effective for a limited period of time (March 12, 2020 - December 31, 2022).Effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2. INVENTORY
Inventory is valued primarily using the average-cost method. The following table summarizes the Company's inventory balances as of the dates indicated (in millions):
December 31,20202019
Fuel and other raw materials$223 $230 
Spare parts and supplies238 257 
Total$461 $487 
December 31, 2017 2016
Fuel and other raw materials $284
 $302
Spare parts and supplies 278
 320
Total $562
 $622
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following table summarizes the components of the electric generation and distribution assets and other property, plant and equipment (in millions) with their estimated useful lives (in years). The amounts are stated net of all prior asset impairment losses recognized.


140 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

  December 31,Estimated Useful LifeDecember 31,
Estimated Useful Life2017 2016(in years)20202019
Electric generation and distribution facilities8 - 40 $21,529
 $22,337
Electric generation and distribution facilities5-40$24,239 $22,869 
Other buildings5 - 71 1,971
 1,906
Other buildings5-511,507 1,612 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment2 - 32 284
 303
Furniture, fixtures and equipment3-30333 319 
Other5 - 44 335
 365
Other5-39628 583 
Total electric generation and distribution assets and other 24,119
 24,911
Total electric generation and distribution assets and other26,707 25,383 
Accumulated depreciation (7,942) (7,919)Accumulated depreciation(8,472)(8,505)
Net electric generation and distribution assets and other $16,177
 $16,992
Net electric generation and distribution assets and other$18,235 $16,878 
The following table summarizes depreciation expense (including the amortization of assets recorded under finance leases in 2020 and 2019 or capital leases in 2018, and the amortization of asset retirement obligations) and interest capitalized during development and construction on qualifying assets for the periods indicated (in millions):
Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015Years Ended December 31,202020192018
Depreciation expense $1,005
 $1,002
 $958
Depreciation expense$1,004 $977 $960 
Interest capitalized during development and construction 139
 118
 84
Interest capitalized during development and construction307 238 199 
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, of $10 billion was mortgaged, pledged or subject to liens as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, including assets classified as held-for-sale.
The following table summarizes regulated and non-regulated generation and distribution property, plant and equipment and accumulated depreciation as of the dates indicated (in millions):
December 31,20202019
Regulated generation and distribution assets and other, gross$8,858 $8,570 
Regulated accumulated depreciation(3,329)(3,029)
Regulated generation and distribution assets and other, net5,529 5,541 
Non-regulated generation and distribution assets and other, gross17,849 16,813 
Non-regulated accumulated depreciation(5,143)(5,476)
Non-regulated generation and distribution assets and other, net12,706 11,337 
Net electric generation and distribution assets and other$18,235 $16,878 
December 31, 2017 2016
Regulated generation, distribution assets and other, gross $8,093
 $7,815
Regulated accumulated depreciation (3,357) (3,299)
Regulated generation, distribution assets and other, net 4,736
 4,516
Non-regulated generation, distribution assets and other, gross 16,026
 17,096
Non-regulated accumulated depreciation (4,585) (4,620)
Non-regulated generation, distribution assets and other, net 11,441
 12,476
Net electric generation, distribution assets and other $16,177
 $16,992
4. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following table presents amounts recognized related to asset retirement obligations for the periods indicated (in millions):
  2017 2016
Balance at January 1 $357
 $247
Additional liabilities incurred 1
 12
Liabilities settled (21) (4)
Accretion expense 16
 15
Change in estimated cash flows 25
 86
Other (10) 1
Balance at December 31 $368
 $357

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

20202019
Balance at January 1$428 $415 
Additional liabilities incurred42 19 
Liabilities settled(20)(12)
Accretion expense22 21 
Change in estimated cash flows58 
Sale of plants(13)(71)
Other(2)
Balance at December 31$462 $428 
The Company's asset retirement obligations primarily include active ash landfills, water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plants and equipment. The $25 million increase inCompany uses the cost approach to determine the initial value of ARO liabilities, which is estimated by discounting expected cash flows for 2017 is primarily relatedoutflows to their present value using market-based rates at the initial recording of the liabilities. Cash outflows are based on the approximate future disposal costs as determined by market information, historical information or other management estimates. Subsequent downward revisions of ARO liabilities are discounted using the market-based rates that existed when the liability was initially recognized. These inputs to the legal obligations for the demolitionfair value of the Huntington Beach UnitsARO liabilities are considered Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company increased the asset retirement obligations and corresponding assets at Chile and Hawaii, by $17 million and $12 million, respectively, and decreased the asset retirement obligation at DPL by $13 million. The increase at Chile is mostly due to the initial recognition of the ARO at Planta Solar II. The increase at Hawaii reflects the shortened useful life of the coal plant resulting from the passage of Senate Bill 2629, which prohibits issuing or renewing permits for coal power plants after December 31,


141 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

2022 and calls for ceasing all coal burning for electricity generation by that date. The decrease at DPL is attributable to the sale of the Hutchings facility in connection withDecember 2020.
During the Southland re-powering project.year ended December 31, 2019, the Company increased the asset retirement obligation and corresponding asset at IPL by $75 million and decreased the asset retirement obligation at DPL by $87 million. The increase at IPL reflects an increase to estimated ash pond closure costs, including groundwater remediation as required by the EPA under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The decrease at DPL was attributable to a revision of the estimated liabilities resulting from the retirement of the Stuart and Killen facilities, and their subsequent transfer in December 2019.
4.5. FAIR VALUE
The fair value of current financial assets and liabilities, debt service reserves, and other deposits approximate their reported carrying amounts. The estimated fair values of the Company's assets and liabilities have been determined using available market information. By virtue ofBecause these amounts beingare estimates and based on hypothetical transactions to sell assets or transfer liabilities, the use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Valuation Techniques The fair value measurement accounting guidance describes three main approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: (1) market approach, (2) income approach, and (3) cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount. The measurement is based on current market expectations of the return on those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace an asset. The Company measures its investments and derivatives at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, in connection with annual or event-driven impairment evaluations, certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include long-lived tangible assets (i.e., property, plant and equipment), goodwill, and intangible assets (e.g., sales concessions, land use rights and water rights, etc.). In general, the Company determines the fair value of investments and derivatives using the market approach and the income approach, respectively. In the nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities, all three approaches are considered; however, the value estimated under the income approach is often the most representative of fair value.
Investments — The Company's investments measured at fair value generally consist of marketable debt and equity securities. Equity securities are either measured at fair value using quoted market prices or based on comparisons to market data obtained for similar assets. Debt securities primarily consist of unsecured debentures and certificates of deposit held by our Brazilian subsidiaries. Returns and pricing on these instruments are generally indexed to the market interest rates in Brazil. Debt securities are measured at fair value based on comparisons to market data obtained for similar assets.
Derivatives — Derivatives are measured at fair value using quoted market prices or the income approach utilizing volatilities, spot and forward benchmark interest rates (such as LIBOR and EURIBOR), foreign exchange rates, credit data, and commodity prices, as applicable. When significant inputs are not observable, the Company uses relevant techniques to determine the inputs, such as regression analysis or prices for similarly traded instruments available in the market.
The Company's methodology to fair value its derivatives is to start with any observable inputs; however, in certain instances the published forward rates or prices may not extend through the remaining term of the contract, and management must make assumptions to extrapolate the curve, which necessitates the use of unobservable inputs, such as proxy commodity prices or historical settlements to forecast forward prices. Specifically, where there is limited forward curve data with respect to foreign exchange contracts beyond the traded points, the Company utilizes the interest rate differential approach to construct the remaining portion of the forward curve. Similarly, in certain instances, the spread that reflects the credit or nonperformance risk is unobservable, requiring the use of proxy yield curves of similar credit quality.
To determine the fair value of a derivative, cash flows are discounted using the relevant spot benchmark interest rate. The Company then makes a credit valuation adjustment ("CVA"), as applicable, by further discounting the cash flows for nonperformance or credit risk based on the observable or estimated debt spread of the Company's subsidiary or its counterparty and the tenor of the respective derivative instrument. The CVA for potential


142 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

future scenarios in which the derivative is in an asset position is based on the counterparty's credit ratings, credit default swap spreads, and debt spreads, as available. The CVA for potential future scenarios in which the derivative is in a liability position is based on the Parent Company's or the subsidiary's current debt spread. In the absence of readily obtainable credit information, the Parent Company's or the subsidiary's estimated credit rating (based on applying a standard industry model to historical financial information and then considering other relevant

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

information) and spreads of comparably rated entities or the respective country's debt spreads are used as a proxy. All derivative instruments are analyzed individually and are subject to unique risk exposures.
The fair value hierarchy of an asset or a liability is based on the level of significance of the input assumptions. An input assumption is considered significant if it affects the fair value by at least 10%. Assets and liabilities are classified as Level 3 when the use of unobservable inputs is significant. When the use of unobservable inputs is insignificant, assets and liabilities are classified as Level 2. Transfers between Level 3 and Level 2 are determined as of the end of the reporting period and result from changes in significance of unobservable inputs used to calculate the CVA.
Debt — Recourse and non-recourse debt are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of recourse debt is estimated based on quoted market prices. The fair value of non-recourse debt is estimated based upon interest rates and other features of the loan. In general, the carrying amount of variable rate debt is a close approximation of its fair value. For fixed rate loans, the fair value is estimated using quoted market prices or discounted cash flow ("DCF") analyses. The fair value of recourse and non-recourse debt excludes accrued interest at the valuation date. The fair value was determined using available market information as of December 31, 2017.2020. The Company is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts subsequent to December 31, 2017.2020.
Nonrecurring measurements For nonrecurring measurements derived using the income approach, fair value is generally determined using valuation models based on the principles of DCF. The income approach is most often used in the impairment evaluation of long-lived tangible assets, equity method investments, goodwill, and intangible assets. Where the use of market observable data is limited or not available for certain input assumptions, the Company develops its own estimates using a variety of techniques such as regression analysis and extrapolations. Depending on the complexity of a valuation, an independent valuation firm may be engaged to assist management in the valuation process.
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the market approach, recent market transactions involving the sale of identical or similar assets are considered. The use of this approach is limited because it is often difficult to identify sale transactions of identical or similar assets. This approach is used in impairment evaluations of certain intangible assets. Otherwise, it is used to corroborate the fair value determined under the income approach.
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the cost approach, fair value is typically based upon a replacement cost approach. This approach involves a considerable amount of judgment, which is why its use is limited to the measurement of long-lived tangible assets. Like the market approach, this approach is also used to corroborate the fair value determined under the income approach.
Fair Value Considerations — In determining fair value, the Company considers the source of observable market data inputs, liquidity of the instrument, the credit risk of the counterparty, and the risk of the Company's or its counterparty's nonperformance. The conditions and criteria used to assess these factors are:
Sources of market assumptions — The Company derives most of its market assumptions from market efficient data sources (e.g., Bloomberg and Reuters). To determine fair value where market data is not readily available, management uses comparable market sources and empirical evidence to develop its own estimates of market assumptions.
Market liquidity — The Company evaluates market liquidity based on whether the financial or physical instrument, or the underlying asset, is traded in an active or inactive market. An active market exists if the prices are fully transparent to market participants, can be measured by market bid and ask quotes, the market has a relatively large proportion of trading volume as compared to the Company's current trading volume, and the market has a significant number of market participants that will allow the market to rapidly absorb the quantity of assets traded without significantly affecting the market price. Another factor the Company considers when determining whether a market is active or inactive is the presence of government or regulatory controls over pricing that could make it difficult to establish a market-based price when entering into a transaction.
Nonperformance risk — Nonperformance risk refers to the risk that an obligation will not be fulfilled and affects the value at which a liability is transferred or an asset is sold. Nonperformance risk includes, but may not be limited


143 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

to, the CompanyCompany's or its counterparty's credit and settlement risk. Nonperformance risk adjustments are dependent on credit spreads, letters of credit, collateral, other arrangements available, and the nature of master netting arrangements. The Company is party to various interest rate swaps and options;options, foreign currency options and forwards;forwards, and derivatives and embedded derivatives, which subject the Company to nonperformance risk. The financial and physical instruments held at the subsidiary level are generally non-recourse to the Parent Company.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Nonperformance risk on the investments held by the Company is incorporated in the fair value derived from quoted market data to mark the investments to fair value.
Recurring Measurements — The following table presents, by level within the fair value hierarchy as described in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated (in millions). For the Company's investments in marketable debt and equity securities, the security classes presented arewere determined based on the nature and risk of the security and are consistent with how the Company manages, monitors, and measures its marketable securities:
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Level 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets
DEBT SECURITIES:
Available-for-sale:
Unsecured debentures$$21 $$21 $$$$
Certificates of deposit238 238 326 326 
Total debt securities259 259 326 326 
EQUITY SECURITIES:
Mutual funds28 51 79 22 61 83 
Total equity securities28 51 79 22 61 83 
DERIVATIVES:
Interest rate derivatives13 13 31 31 
Cross-currency derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives15 146 161 17 93 110 
Commodity derivatives10 28 30 
Total derivatives — assets41 148 189 76 95 171 
TOTAL ASSETS$28 $351 $148 $527 $22 $463 $95 $580 
Liabilities
DERIVATIVES:
Interest rate derivatives$$374 $236 $610 $$144 $184 $328 
Cross-currency derivatives10 11 21 
Foreign currency derivatives43 43 44 44 
Commodity derivatives22 22 29 31 
Total derivatives — liabilities441 238 679 227 197 424 
TOTAL LIABILITIES$$441 $238 $679 $$227 $197 $424 
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets                
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:                
Debt securities:                
Unsecured debentures $
 $207
 $
 $207
 $
 $205
 $
 $205
Certificates of deposit 
 153
 
 153
 
 260
 
 260
Government debt securities 
 
 
 
 
 9
 
 9
Subtotal 
 360
 
 360
 
 474
 
 474
Equity securities:                
Mutual funds 
 52
 
 52
 
 48
 
 48
Subtotal 
 52
 
 52
 
 48
 
 48
Total available for sale 
 412
 
 412
 
 522
 
 522
TRADING:                
Equity securities:                
Mutual funds 20
 
 
 20
 16
 
 
 16
Total trading 20
 
 
 20
 16
 
 
 16
DERIVATIVES:                
Interest rate derivatives 
 15
 
 15
 
 18
 
 18
Cross-currency derivatives 
 29
 
 29
 
 4
 
 4
Foreign currency derivatives 
 29
 240
 269
 
 54
 255
 309
Commodity derivatives 
 30
 5
 35
 
 38
 7
 45
Total derivatives — assets 
 103
 245
 348
 
 114
 262
 376
TOTAL ASSETS $20
 $515
 $245
 $780
 $16
 $636
 $262
 $914
Liabilities                
DERIVATIVES:                
Interest rate derivatives $
 $111
 $151
 $262
 $
 $121
 $179
 $300
Cross-currency derivatives 
 3
 
 3
 
 18
 
 18
Foreign currency derivatives 
 30
 
 30
 
 64
 
 64
Commodity derivatives 
 19
 1
 20
 
 40
 2
 42
Total derivatives — liabilities 
 163
 152
 315
 
 243
 181
 424
TOTAL LIABILITIES $
 $163
 $152
 $315
 $
 $243
 $181
 $424
As of December 31, 2017,2020, all AFS debt securities had stated maturities within one year. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, and 2015,2018, no other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities were recognized in earnings or Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).(Loss) and as of January 1, 2020, credit-related impairments are recognized in earnings under ASC 326. See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information. Gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined using the specific-identification method. The following table presents gross proceeds from sale of AFS securities for the periods indicated (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015
Gross proceeds from sales of AFS securities $1,398
 $1,726
 $1,226
Any Level 1 derivative instruments are exchange-traded commodity futures for which the pricing is observable in active markets, and as such, these are not expected to transfer to other levels. There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.
Year Ended December 31,202020192018
Gross proceeds from sale of AFS securities$582 $663 $1,403 
The following tables present a reconciliation of net derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (presented net by type of derivative in millions). Transfers between Level 3 and Level 2 are determined as of the end of the reporting period and principally result from changes in the significance of unobservable inputs used to calculate the credit valuation adjustment.



144 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Year Ended December 31, 2020Interest RateCross CurrencyForeign CurrencyCommodityTotal
Balance at January 1$(184)$(11)$94 $(1)$(102)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings(2)67 70 
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(84)(10)23 (71)
Settlements34 21 (39)17 
Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3(6)(6)
Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 3
Balance at December 31$(236)$(2)$146 $$(90)
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$$(2)$35 $$35 
Year Ended December 31, 2017Interest Rate Foreign Currency Commodity Total
Balance at January 1$(179) $255
 $5
 $81
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):       
Included in earnings(1) 21
 1
 21
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(23) 
 
 (23)
Included in regulatory liabilities
 
 10
 10
Settlements36
 (36) (12) (12)
Transfers of liabilities into Level 3(4) 
 
 (4)
Transfers of liabilities out of Level 320
 
 
 20
Balance at December 31$(151) $240
 $4
 $93
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$7
 $(15) $1
 $(7)
Year Ended December 31, 2016Interest Rate Foreign Currency Commodity Total
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2019Interest RateCross CurrencyForeign CurrencyCommodityTotal
Balance at January 1$(304) $277
 $3
 $(24)Balance at January 1$(140)$$199 $$63 
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):       Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings
 31
 2
 33
Included in earnings(1)(65)(2)(68)
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(36) 6
 
 (30)Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(97)(17)(114)
Included in other comprehensive income — foreign currency translation activity3
 (52) 
 (49)
Included in regulatory liabilities
 
 11
 11
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilitiesIncluded in regulatory (assets) liabilities(5)(5)
Settlements72
 (22) (11) 39
Settlements(23)(13)
Transfers of liabilities into Level 3(32) 
 
 (32)
Transfers of assets out of Level 3118
 15
 
 133
Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3(2)(11)(13)
Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 3Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 348 48 
Balance at December 31$(179) $255
 $5
 $81
Balance at December 31$(184)$(11)$94 $(1)$(102)
Total gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$6
 $16
 $2
 $24
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the periodTotal gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$$$(67)$(2)$(69)
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used for the Level 3 derivative assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 20172020 (in millions, except range amounts):
Type of Derivative Fair Value Unobservable Input 
Amount or Range
(Weighted Average)
Interest rate $(151) Subsidiaries’ credit spreads 1.9% - 5.1% (4.9%)
Foreign currency:      
Argentine peso 240
 
Argentine peso to U.S. dollar currency exchange rate after one year  (1)
 22.8 - 52.3 (36.6)
Commodity:      
Other 4
    
Total $93
    
____________________________
Type of DerivativeFair ValueUnobservable Input
(1)Amount or Range
(Weighted Average)
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company began utilizing the interestInterest rate differential approach$(236)Subsidiaries’ credit spreads0.6% - 3.6% (3.5%)
Cross-currency(2)Subsidiaries’ credit spreads3.6% - 3.6% (3.6%)
Foreign currency:
Argentine peso146 Argentine peso to construct the remaining portion of the forward curveUSD currency exchange rate after one year (beyond the traded points). In previous periods, the Company used the purchasing price parity approach to construct the forward curve.86 - 1,027 (405)
Commodity:
Other
Total$(90)
For interest rate derivatives and foreign currency derivatives, increases (decreases) in the estimates of the Company's own credit spreads would decrease (increase) the value of the derivatives in a liability position. For foreign currency derivatives, increases (decreases) in the estimate of the above exchange rate would increase (decrease) the value of the derivative.
Nonrecurring Measurements
When evaluating impairment of long-lived assets and equity method investments, theThe Company measures fair value using the applicable fair value measurement guidance. Impairment expense is measured by comparing the fair value at the evaluation date to theirthe then-latest available carrying amount. The following table summarizes our major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period and their level within the fair value hierarchy (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Measurement Date 
Carrying Amount (1)
 Fair Value 
Pre-tax
Loss
Assets  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Long-lived assets held and used: (2)
            
Laurel Mountain 12/31/2017 $154
 $
 $
 $33
 $121
Kilroot 12/31/2017 69
 
 
 20
 37
DPL 02/28/2017 77
 
 
 11
 66
Other Various 18
 
 
 
 18
Dispositions and held-for-sale businesses: (3)
            
DPL Peaker Assets 12/31/2017 346
 
 237
 
 109
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric (4)
 06/30/2017 190
 
 92
 
 92
Kazakhstan CHPs 03/31/2017 171
 
 29
 
 94
Year Ended December 31, 2020Measurement Date
Carrying Amount (1)
Fair Value
Pre-tax
Loss
AssetsLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Long-lived assets held and used:
AES Gener (2)
8/1/2020$1,087 $$$306 $781 
Hawaii (2)
8/31/2020114 76 38 
Estrella del Mar I (2)
9/30/202044 14 30 
Equity method investments:
OPGC (3)
03/31/2020195 152 43 
OPGC (3)
06/30/2020272 104 158 

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015


Year Ended December 31, 2016 Measurement Date 
Carrying Amount (1)
 Fair Value 
Pre-tax
Loss
Assets  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Long-lived assets held and used: (2)
            
DPL 12/31/2016 $787
 $
 $60
 $103
 $624
Buffalo Gap I 08/31/2016 113
 
 
 36
 77
DPL 06/30/2016 324
 
 
 89
 235
Buffalo Gap II 03/31/2016 251
 
 
 92
 159
Discontinued operations: (3)
            
Sul 06/30/2016 1,581
 
 470
 
 783
_____________________________
(1)
Represents the carrying values at the dates of measurement, before fair value adjustment.145 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
(2)

Year Ended December 31, 2019Measurement Date
Carrying Amount (1)
Fair Value
Pre-tax
Loss
AssetsLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Dispositions and held-for-sale businesses: (4)
Kilroot and Ballylumford04/12/2019$232 $$118 $$115 
Long-lived assets held and used:
Hawaii (2)
12/31/2019163 103 60 
Equity method investments:
OPGC (3)
12/31/2019304 212 92 
_____________________________
(1)Represents the carrying values at the dates of initial measurement, before fair value adjustment.
(2)See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
(3)See Note 8—Investments In and Advances to Affiliatesfor further information.
(4)Per the Company's policy, pre-tax loss is limited to the impairment of long-lived assets. Any additional loss will be recognized on completion of the sale. See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense and Note 25—Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
See Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
(3)
Per the Company's policy, pre-tax loss is limited to the impairment of long-lived assets. Any additional loss will be recognized on completion of the sale. Upon disposal of Sul, we incurred an additional pre-tax loss on sale of $602 million. See Note 21—Discontinued Operationsand Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
(4)
Per the Company's policy, pre-tax loss is limited to the impairment of long-lived assets. Any additional loss will be recognized on completion of the sale. Upon disposal of Kazakhstan HPPs, we incurred an additional pre-tax loss on disposal of $33 million. See Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense and Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 measurement of long-lived assets held and used measured on a nonrecurring basis during the year ended December 31, 20172020 (in millions, except range amounts):
December 31, 2020Fair ValueValuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRange (Weighted Average)
Long-lived assets held and used:
AES Gener$306 Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(90)% to 10% (-2%)
Variable margin(94)% to 24% (-3%)
Weighted-average cost of capital7% to 10%
Hawaii76 Discounted cash flowMonthly revenue growth(12)% to 13% (0%)
Pre-tax operating margin24% to 35% (29%)
Weighted-average cost of capital10% to 13%
Estrella del Mar I14 Comparable market transactionsSale price per kilowatt (USD)$160 to $520 ($315)
Age of unit when sold (years)15 to 25 (18)
Equity method investments:
OPGC (1)
152 Expected present valueAnnual dividend growth(25)% to 40% (2%)
Weighted-average cost of equity12 %
Total$548 
December 31, 2017 Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input Range (Weighted Average)
Long-lived assets held and used:        
Laurel Mountain $33
 Discounted cash flow Annual revenue growth -30% to 2% (0%)
      Pre-tax operating margin (through remaining life) 61% to 73% (64%)
      Weighted-average cost of capital 9%
Kilroot 20
 Discounted cash flow Annual revenue growth -85% to 17% (-16%)
      Annual pre-tax operating margin -32% to 28% (6%)
      Weighted-average cost of capital 8%
DPL 11
 Discounted cash flow Pre-tax operating margin (through remaining life) 10% to 22% (15%)
      Weighted-average cost of capital 7%
Total $64
      
_____________________________
(1)Fair value measurement performed as of March 31, 2020, which included the Level 3 inputs shown above. The fair value measurement performed at June 30, 2020 included only Level 2 inputs; therefore, it is not included in this table.
Financial Instruments not Measured at Fair Value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following table presents (in millions) the carrying amount, fair value, and fair value hierarchy of the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the periods indicated, but for which fair value is disclosed.disclosed:
December 31, 2020
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
$97 $197 $$$197 
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt16,354 18,403 15,301 3,097 
Recourse debt3,446 3,677 3,677 
   December 31, 2017
   
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
   Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
 $163
 $217
 $
 $6
 $211
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt 15,340
 15,890
 
 13,350
 2,540
 Recourse debt 4,630
 4,920
 
 4,920
 
 December 31, 2016December 31, 2019
 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
 $232
 $342
 $
 $20
 $322
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
$98 $145 $$$145 
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt 14,783
 15,185
 
 14,140
 1,045
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt16,712 16,579 15,804 775 
Recourse debt 4,671
 4,899
 
 4,899
 
Recourse debt3,396 3,529 3,529 
_____________________________
(1)These amounts primarily relate to amounts due from CAMMESA, the administrator of the wholesale electricity market in Argentina, and amounts related to green blend and extend agreements in Chile and are included in Other noncurrent assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value and carrying amount of the Argentina receivables exclude VAT of $4 million and $11 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 7—Financing Receivables for further information.


(1)
These amounts primarily relate146 | Notes to amounts due from CAMMESA, the administrator of the wholesale electricity market in Argentina, and are included in Other noncurrent assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value and carrying amount of these receivables exclude VAT of $31 million and $24 million as ofFinancial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016, respectively.
2018

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

5.6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Volume of Activity — The following table presents the Company's maximum notional (in millions) over the remaining contractual period by type of derivative as of December 31, 2017,2020, regardless of whether they are in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, and the dates through which the maturities for each type of derivative range:
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency DerivativesMaximum Notional Translated to USDLatest Maturity
Interest Rate (LIBOR and EURIBOR)$4,772 2047
Cross-currency swaps (Chilean Unidad de Fomento and Brazilian Reais)246 2028
Foreign Currency:
Argentine peso56 2026
Chilean peso318 2022
Colombian peso190 2023
Euro149 2023
Others, primarily with weighted average remaining maturities of a year or less31 2022
Derivatives Maximum Notional Translated to USD Latest Maturity
Interest Rate (LIBOR and EURIBOR) $4,481
 2036
Cross-Currency Swaps (Chilean Unidad de Fomento and Chilean Peso) 410
 2029
Foreign Currency:    
Argentine Peso 187
 2026
Chilean Peso 410
 2020
Colombian Peso 305
 2019
Others, primarily with weighted average remaining maturities of a year or less 303
 2020
Commodity DerivativesMaximum NotionalLatest Maturity
Natural Gas (in MMBtu)23 2021
Power (in MWhs)2024
Coal (in Tons or Metric Tonnes)2027
Accounting and ReportingAssets and Liabilities — The following tables present the fair value of assets and liabilities related to the Company's derivative instruments as of the periods indicated (in millions):
Fair ValueDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
AssetsDesignatedNot DesignatedTotalDesignatedNot DesignatedTotal
Interest rate derivatives$13 $$13 $31 $$31 
Cross-currency derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives40 121 161 31 79 110 
Commodity derivatives10 30 30 
Total assets$60 $129 $189 $62 $109 $171 
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives$506 $104 $610 $323 $$328 
Cross-currency derivatives21 21 
Foreign currency derivatives35 43 22 22 44 
Commodity derivatives22 22 29 31 
Total liabilities$518 $161 $679 $368 $56 $424 
Fair Value December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Assets Designated Not Designated Total Designated Not Designated Total
Interest rate derivatives $15
 $
 $15
 $18
 $
 $18
Cross-currency derivatives 29
 
 29
 4
 
 4
Foreign currency derivatives 8
 261
 269
 9
 300
 309
Commodity derivatives 5
 30
 35
 20
 25
 45
Total assets $57
 $291
 $348
 $51
 $325
 $376
Liabilities            
Interest rate derivatives $125
 $137
 $262
 $295
 $5
 $300
Cross-currency derivatives 3
 
 3
 18
 
 18
Foreign currency derivatives 1
 29
 30
 19
 45
 64
Commodity derivatives 9
 11
 20
 26
 16
 42
Total liabilities $138
 $177
 $315
 $358
 $66
 $424

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Fair ValueAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
Current$51 $236 $72 $126 
Noncurrent138 443 99 298 
Total$189 $679 $171 $424 
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Fair Value Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current $84
 $211
 $99
 $155
Noncurrent 264
 104
 277
 269
Total $348
 $315
 $376
 $424
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features (1)
     December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Present value of liabilities subject to collateralization     $15
 $41
Cash collateral held by third parties or in escrow     9
 18

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features (1)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Present value of liabilities subject to collateralization$$
Cash collateral held by third parties or in escrow
_____________________________
(1)     Based on the credit rating of certain subsidiaries


(1)
Based on the credit rating of certain subsidiaries147 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

As of December 31, 2019, all derivative instruments subject to credit risk-related contingent features were in an asset position.
Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) — The following table presents (in millions) the pre-tax gains (losses) recognized in AOCL and earnings related to all derivative instruments for the periods indicated:indicated (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
 Years Ended December 31,202020192018
2017 2016 2015
Effective portion of cash flow hedges      
Cash flow hedgesCash flow hedges
Gains (losses) recognized in AOCL      Gains (losses) recognized in AOCL
Interest rate derivatives $(66) $(35) $(103)Interest rate derivatives$(511)$(290)$(16)
Cross-currency derivatives 31
 21
 (20)Cross-currency derivatives(26)(26)
Foreign currency derivatives (5) (4) 10
Foreign currency derivatives25 (23)(52)
Commodity derivatives 18
 30
 40
Commodity derivatives
Total $(22) $12
 $(73)Total$(478)$(339)$(94)
Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCL to earnings      Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCL to earnings
Interest rate derivatives $(82) $(101) $(116)Interest rate derivatives$(75)$(28)$(52)
Cross-currency derivatives 34
 8
 (24)Cross-currency derivatives(5)(12)(43)
Foreign currency derivatives (20) (8) 32
Foreign currency derivatives(9)(13)(16)
Commodity derivatives 17
 56
 31
Commodity derivatives(2)(1)(6)
Total $(51) $(45) $(77)Total$(91)$(54)$(117)
Loss reclassified from AOCL to earnings due to discontinuance of hedge accounting (1)
 $(13) $
 $
Loss reclassified from AOCL to earnings due to discontinuance of hedge accounting (1)
$$(2)$
Gain (losses) recognized in earnings related to      Gain (losses) recognized in earnings related to
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges $3
 $(1) $(6)Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges$$$(7)
Not designated as hedging instruments:      Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate derivativesInterest rate derivatives(1)
Foreign currency derivatives $1
 $19
 $211
Foreign currency derivatives68 (46)148 
Commodity derivatives and other 14
 (16) (29)Commodity derivatives and other(68)(6)25 
Total $15
 $3
 $182
Total$(1)$(52)$173 
_____________________________
(1)
Cash flow hedge was discontinued because it was probable the forecasted transaction will not occur.
The (1)     Cash flow hedge was discontinued on a cross-currency swap in 2019 because the underlying debt was prepaid.
AOCL is expected to decrease pre-tax income from continuing operations primarily due to interest rate derivatives, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 is $58 million.2021 by $98 million, primarily due to interest rate derivatives.
6.7. FINANCING RECEIVABLES
Receivables with contractual maturities of greater than one year are considered financing receivables, primarily related to amended agreements or government resolutions due from CAMMESA.receivables. The following table presents financing receivables by country as of the dates indicated (in millions):. As the Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption for ASC 326 effective January 1, 2020, CECL reserves are included in the receivable balance as of December 31, 2020. See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
December 31,Gross ReceivableAllowanceNet ReceivableReceivable
Argentina$48 $$39 $64 
Chile31 31 33 
Other31 31 12 
Total$110 $$101 $109 
December 31, 2017 2016
Argentina $177
 $236
Other 17
 20
Total $194
 $256
Argentina
Collection of the principal and interest on these receivables is subject to various business risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the continued operation of power plants which generate cash for payments of these receivables, regulatory changes that could impact the timing and amount of collections, and economic conditions in Argentina. The Company monitors these risks, including the credit ratings of the Argentine government, on a quarterly basis to assess the collectability of these receivables. The Company accrues interest on these receivables if collectability is reasonably assured.once the recognition criteria have been met. The Company's collection estimates are based on assumptions that it believes to be reasonable, but are inherently uncertain. Actual future cash flows could differ from these estimates. The decrease in Argentina financing receivables was primarily due to planned collections and unfavorable FX impacts.
FONINVEMEM Agreements —As a result of energy market reforms in 2004 and 2010, AES Argentina entered into three3 agreements with the Argentine government, referred to as the FONINVEMEM Agreements, to contribute a


148 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

portion of their accounts receivable into a fund for financing the construction of combined cycle and gas-fired plants. These receivables accrue interest and are collected in monthly installments over 10 years once the related plant begins operations. In addition, AES Argentina receives an ownership interest in these newly built plants once the receivables have been fully repaid.
The FONINVEMEM receivables are denominated in Argentine pesos, but indexed to U.S. dollars,USD, which represents a foreign currency derivative. Due to differences between spot rates, used to remeasure the receivables, and discounted forward rates, used to value the foreign currency derivative, these two items will not perfectly offset over the life of the receivable. Once settled, the foreign currency derivative will offset the accumulated unrealized foreign currency losses resulting from the devaluation of the FONINVEMEM receivable. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the amount of the foreign currency-

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

relatedcurrency-related derivative assets associated with the FONINVEMEM financing receivables that were excluded from the table above had a fair value of $240$146 million and $255$94 million, respectively.
The receivables under the FONINVEMEM Agreements have been actively collected since the related plants commenced operations in 2010 and 2016. In assessing the collectability of the receivables under these agreements, the Company also considers historic collection evidence in accordance with the agreements.
Other AgreementsOther agreements primarily consist of resolutions passed by the Argentine government in which AES Argentina will receive compensation for investments in new generation plants and technologies. The timing of collections depend on corresponding agreements and collectability of these receivables are assessed on an ongoing basis.
Chile
7.AES Gener has recorded receivables pertaining to revenues recognized on regulated energy contracts that were impacted by the Stabilization Fund created by the Chilean government in October 2019, in conjunction with the Tariff Stabilization Law. Historically, the government updated the prices for these contracts every six months to reflect the indexation the contracts have to exchange rates and commodities prices. The Stabilization Fund does not allow the pass-through of these contractual indexation updates to customers beyond the pricing in effect at July 1, 2019, until new lower-cost renewable contracts are incorporated into pricing in 2023. Consequently, costs incurred in excess of the July 1, 2019 price will be accumulated and borne by generators.
On December 31, 2020, AES Gener executed an agreement for the sale of $105 million of receivables generated pursuant the Tariff Stabilization Law at a discount of $20 million. As a result of the agreement, as of December 31, 2020, $77 million of current receivables and $8 million of noncurrent receivables were recorded in Accounts receivable and Other noncurrent assets, respectively, pertaining to the Stabilization Fund. Additionally, $23 million of payment deferrals granted to mining customers as part of our green blend and extend agreements were recorded as financing receivables included in Other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2020.
8. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES
The following table summarizes the relevant effective equity ownership interest and carrying values for the Company's investments accounted for under the equity method as of the periods indicated:
December 31,  2017 2016 2017 2016
AffiliateCountry Carrying Value (in millions) Ownership Interest %
sPowerUnited States $508
 $
 50% %
Guacolda (1)
Chile 357
 362
 33% 33%
OPGC (2)
India 269
 195
 49% 49%
Elsta (3)
Netherlands 38
 41
 50% 50%
Equity method investments of Distributed Energy (3)
United States 15
 22
 95% 95%
Barry (3)
United Kingdom 
 
 100% 100%
Other affiliatesVarious 10
 1
    
Total  $1,197
 $621
    
December 31,2020201920202019
AffiliateCountryCarrying Value (in millions)Ownership Interest %
sPower (1)
United States$551 $442 50 %50 %
UplightUnited States85 91 32 %32 %
Mesa La PazMexico60 66 50 %50 %
Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom (2)
Dominican Republic49 48 43 %43 %
OPGCIndia212 49 %49 %
Guacolda (3)
Chile74 34 %33 %
Barry (4)
United Kingdom100 %100 %
Other affiliates (5)
Various90 33 
Total$835 $966 
_____________________________
(1)In January 2021, the sPower and AES Distributed Energy development platforms were merged to form AES Clean Energy Development. See Note 31—Subsequent Events for further information.
(2)The Company's ownership in Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom is held through AES Andres, an 85%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Andres owns 50% of Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom, resulting in an AES effective ownership of 43%.
(3)The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership of 34%.
(4)Represents a VIE in which the Company holds a variable interest, but is not the primary beneficiary.
(5)Includes Bosforo, Fluence, and Tucano equity method investments, and others, as well as a $67 million loan facility granted from Colon to an equity method affiliate in 2020.


(1)
The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 33%.149 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
(2)
OPGC has one coal-fired project under development which is an expansion of our existing OPGC business. The project started construction in April 2014 and is expected to begin operations in 2019.
(3)
Represent VIEs in which the Company holds a variable interest, but is not the primary beneficiary.
sPower
OPGCIn February 2017,December 2019, an other-than-temporary impairment was identified at OPGC primarily due to the estimated market value of the Company's investment and other negative developments impacting future expected cash flows at the investee. A calculation of the fair value of the Company’s investment in OPGC was required to evaluate whether there was a loss in the carrying value of the investment. Based on management’s estimate of fair value of $212 million, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment of $92 million in Other non-operating expense in December 2019. In March 2020, management’s updated estimate of fair value was $152 million and Alberta Investment Management Corporation (“AIMCo”)the Company recognized an additional other-than-temporary impairment of $43 million due to the economic slowdown.
In June 2020, the Company agreed to sell its entire 49% stake in OPGC resulting in an additional other-than-temporary impairment of $158 million. Total other-than-temporary impairment for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $201 million, recognized in Other non-operating expense. In December 2020, the Company completed the sale for $135 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $23 million, primarily due to the write-off of cumulative translation adjustments. Prior to its sale, the OPGC equity method investment was reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Fluence — In December 2020, Fluence entered into an agreement with the QIA whereby QIA will invest $125 million in Fluence. Following the completion of the transaction, which is expected in the second quarter of 2021, AES and Siemens are expected to acquire FTP Power LLC (“sPower”).each own approximately 44% of Fluence. The Fluence equity method investment is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
Guacolda — In July 2017, AES closed onOctober 2019, Guacolda management reviewed the acquisitionrecoverability of the Guacolda asset group and determined the undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the carrying amount. Guacolda recognized a long-lived asset impairment at the investee level, which negatively impacted the Company's Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates by $158 million.
In September 2020, Guacolda management identified additional impairment indicators primarily as a result of inability to re-contract Guacolda’s generation after expiration of its 48% ownershipexisting PPAs driven by lower energy prices in Chile and reduced forecasted cash flows resulting from decarbonization initiatives of the Chilean Government. Guacolda recognized a long-lived asset impairment at the investee level, which negatively impacted the Company's Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates by $127 million. As a result, the Company’s basis in its investment in Guacolda was reduced to zero and the equity method of accounting was suspended. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has not recognized $99 million of equity method losses which were in excess of the Company’s carrying amount. The Guacolda equity method investment is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Energía Natural Dominicana EnadomIn September 2019, AES Andres established a joint venture with Energas Group for the purpose of selling natural gas and related terminal services, storage, regasification, and transportation to customers in the Dominican Republic. Gas Natural del Este (subsequently renamed Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the joint venture, acquired the Eastern Pipeline development project from AES Andres for total consideration of $55 million, resulting in a gain of $2 million. The transaction was considered a contribution of a nonfinancial asset in exchange for a noncontrolling interest in sPower for $461 million. In November 2017, AES acquired an additional 2% ownership interest in sPower for $19 million.the joint venture. As the Company does not control sPower,the joint venture, it is accounted for as an equity method investment. The sPower portfolio includes solarinvestment and wind projects in operation, under construction, and in development locatedis reported in the United States.MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Uplight — In July 2019, Simple Energy merged with Tendril, a previously unrelated party, to form Uplight, a new company that offers a comprehensive platform for utility customer engagement. As part of this merger, the Company contributed its ownership interest in Simple Energy and $53 million of cash in exchange for an ownership interest in the merged company. This transaction resulted in a gain on sale of $12 million and a total investment in Uplight of $98 million. As the Company does not control Uplight, it is accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
sPower — In April 2019, the Company closed on the sale of approximately 48% of its interest in a portfolio of sPower’s operating assets for $173 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments, of which $58 million was used to pay down debt at sPower. This sale resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of business interests of $28 million. After the sale, the Company’s ownership interest in this portfolio of sPower’s operating assets decreased from 50% to approximately 26%. The sPower equity method investment is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Guacolda — In September 2015, AES Gener and Global Infrastructure Partners ("GIP") executed a restructuring of Guacolda that increased Guacolda's tax basis in certain long-term assets and AES Gener's equity investment. As a result, AES Gener recorded $66 million in net equity in earnings of affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $46 million is attributable to The AES Corporation.
AES Barry Ltd. — The Company holds a 100% ownership interest in AES Barry Ltd. ("Barry"), a dormant entity in the U.K. that disposed of its generation and other operating assets. Due to a debt agreement, no material financial or


150 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

operating decisions can be made without the banks' consent, and the Company does not control Barry. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, other long-term liabilities included $45$46 million and $41$44 million related to this debt agreement.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Summarized Financial Information— The following tables summarize financial information of the Company's 50%-or-less-owned affiliates and majority-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries that are accounted for using the equity method (in millions):
50%-or-less Owned Affiliates Majority-Owned Unconsolidated Subsidiaries 50%-or-less Owned AffiliatesMajority-Owned Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015Years ended December 31,202020192018202020192018
Revenue$762
 $586
 $641
 $16
 $23
 $24
Revenue$1,880 $1,122 $962 $$49 $40 
Operating margin165
 145
 152
 5
 9
 11
Operating margin (loss)Operating margin (loss)213 124 135 (3)(5)
Net income (loss)72
 64
 210
 (15) (2) 6
Net income (loss)(538)(724)14 (4)(7)(3)
           
December 31,2017 2016   2017 2016  December 31,20202019 20202019 
Current assets$418
 $308
   $70
 $16
  Current assets$1,017 $831 $159 $166 
Noncurrent assets5,372
 2,577
   102
 181
  Noncurrent assets6,230 7,220 886 982 
Current liabilities633
 626
   10
 10
  Current liabilities1,294 1,271 121 141 
Noncurrent liabilities2,629
 1,209
   147
 122
  Noncurrent liabilities3,671 3,966 981 1,052 
Stockholders' equity2,527
 1,048
   15
 65
  Stockholders' equity2,282 2,814 (57)(45)
At December 31, 2017,2020, retained earnings included $254$120 million related to the undistributed earningslosses of the Company's 50%-or-less owned affiliates. Distributions received from these affiliates were $69$14 million, $24$23 million, and $18$83 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the underlying equity in the net assets of our equity affiliates exceeded the aggregate carrying amount of our investments in equity affiliates exceeded the underlying equity in their net assets by $46$150 million.
8.9. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill — The following table summarizes the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in millions):
US and UtilitiesSouth AmericaMCACEurasiaTotal
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Goodwill$2,786 $868 $16 $$3,670 
Accumulated impairment losses(2,611)(2,611)
Net balance175 868 16 1,059 
Balance as of December 31, 2020
Goodwill2,788 868 16 3,672 
Accumulated impairment losses(2,611)(2,611)
Net balance$177 $868 $16 $$1,061 
 US Andes MCAC Eurasia Total
Balance as of December 31, 2016         
Goodwill$2,674
 $899
 $149
 $190
 $3,912
Accumulated impairment losses(2,633) 
 
 (122) (2,755)
Net balance41
 899
 149
 68
 1,157
Transfer to assets held-for-sale  (1)

 (30) 
 (68) (98)
Balance as of December 31, 2017         
Goodwill2,674
 869
 149
 122
 3,814
Accumulated impairment losses(2,633) 
 
 (122) (2,755)
Net balance$41
 $869
 $149
 $
 $1,059
_____________________________
(1)
See Note 22---Held-For-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
DP&L — During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company performed the annual goodwill impairment test at its DP&L reporting unit and recognized a goodwill impairment expense of $317 million. The reporting unit failed Step 1 as its fair value was less than its carrying amount, which was primarily due to a decrease in forecasted dark spreads that were driven by decreases in projected forward power prices, and lower than expected revenues from a new CP product. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined under the income approach using a discounted cash flow valuation model. The significant assumptions included within the discounted cash flow valuation model were forward commodity price curves, the amount of non-bypassable charges from the pending ESP, expected revenues from the new CP product, and planned environmental expenditures. In Step 2, goodwill was determined to have an implied negative fair value after the hypothetical purchase price allocation under the accounting guidance for business combinations; therefore, a full impairment of the remaining goodwill balance of $317 million was recognized. DP&L is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Other Intangible Assets — The following table summarizes the balances comprising Other intangible assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions) as of the periods indicated:
December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Gross Balance Accumulated Amortization Net Balance Gross Balance Accumulated Amortization Net BalanceGross BalanceAccumulated AmortizationNet BalanceGross BalanceAccumulated AmortizationNet Balance
Subject to Amortization    

      Subject to Amortization
Internal-use software$416
 $(330) $86
 $396
 $(304) $92
Internal-use software$386 $(255)$131 $367 $(228)$139 
Contracts92
 (21) 71
 53
 (15) 38
Contracts157 (38)119 134 (29)105 
Contractual payment rights (1)
65
 (47) 18
 56
 (42) 14
Project development rights57
 (1) 56
 4
 (1) 3
Other (2)
98
 (42) 56
 103
 (37) 66
Project development rights (1)
Project development rights (1)
203 (5)198 100 (1)99 
Emissions allowances (2)
Emissions allowances (2)
64 64 24 24 
Concession rightsConcession rights201 (18)183 39 (35)
Other (3)
Other (3)
59 (14)45 43 (14)29 
Subtotal728
 (441) 287
 612
 (399) 213
Subtotal1,070 (330)740 707 (307)400 
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets           Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Land use rights45
 
 45
 47
 
 47
Land use rights39 39 21 21 
Water rights20
 
 20
 17
 
 17
Water rights20 20 20 20 
Transmission rightsTransmission rights22 22 23 23 
Other14
 
 14
 10
 
 10
Other
Subtotal79
 
 79
 74
 
 74
Subtotal87 87 69 69 
Total$807
 $(441) $366
 $686
 $(399) $287
Total$1,157 $(330)$827 $776 $(307)$469 
_____________________________
(1)Includes emission offset fee to the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) in order to transfer emission offsets from retired legacy Southland units to the new CCGT.


(1)
Represent legal rights151 | Notes to receive system reliability payments from the regulator.Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
(2)

(2)Acquired or purchased emissions allowances are finite-lived intangible assets that are expensed when utilized and included in net income for the year.
(3)Includes management rights, renewable energy credits and incentives, and other individually insignificant intangible assets.
Includes management rights, sales concessions, gas extraction rights, and other individually insignificant intangible assets.
The following tables summarize other intangible assets acquired during the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2020AmountSubject to Amortization/Indefinite-LivedWeighted Average Amortization Period (in years)Amortization Method
Internal-use software$35 Subject to Amortization4Straight-line
Contracts28 Subject to Amortization20Straight-line
Project development rights109 Subject to Amortization30Straight-line
Emissions allowances56 Subject to AmortizationVariousAs utilized
Transmission rights20 Indefinite-LivedN/AN/A
Concession rights (1)
184 Subject to Amortization12Straight-line
Other22 VariousN/AN/A
Total$454 
December 31, 2017Amount Subject to Amortization/Indefinite-Lived Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) Amortization Method
Project Development Rights$53
 Subject to Amortization 30 Straight-line
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019AmountSubject to Amortization/Indefinite-LivedWeighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
Amortization
Method
Internal-use softwareInternal-use software$61 Subject to Amortization5Straight-line
Contracts34
 Subject to Amortization 25 Straight-lineContractsSubject to Amortization35Straight-line
Internal-use software17
 Subject to Amortization 7 Straight-line
Project development rightsProject development rightsSubject to Amortization29Straight-line
Emissions allowancesEmissions allowances22 Subject to AmortizationVariousAs utilized
Transmission rightsTransmission rights23 Indefinite-LivedN/AN/A
Other8
 Various N/A N/AOtherVariousN/AN/A
Total$112
 Total$121 
_____________________________
December 31, 2016Amount Subject to Amortization/Indefinite-Lived Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 
Amortization
Method
Internal-use software$41
 Subject to Amortization 4 Straight-line
Contracts24
 Subject to Amortization 26 Straight-line
Other5
 Subject to Amortization 13 Straight-line
Total$70
      
(1)Represents the fair value assigned to the extension of the Tietê hydroelectric plants' concession agreement with ANEEL, expected to be finalized in the first quarter of 2021. See Note 13—Contingencies for further information.
The following table summarizes the estimated amortization expense by intangible asset category for 20182021 through 2022:2025:
(in millions)2018 2019 2020 2021 2022(in millions)20212022202320242025
Internal-use software$17
 $14
 $12
 $10
 $9
Internal-use software$36 $30 $25 $23 $21 
Contracts5
 5
 5
 5
 5
Contracts
Concession rightsConcession rights16 16 17 16 16 
Other11
 12
 10
 8
 9
Other
Total$33
 $31
 $27
 $23
 $23
Total$70 $64 $59 $53 $50 
Intangible asset amortization expense was $34$54 million, $37$45 million and $47 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015


152 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
9.
10. REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Company has recorded regulatory assets and liabilities (in millions) that it expects to pass through to its customers in accordance with, and subject to, regulatory provisions as follows:
December 31,2017 2016 Recovery/Refund PeriodDecember 31,20202019Recovery/Refund Period
REGULATORY ASSETS  
Regulatory assetsRegulatory assets
Current regulatory assets:    Current regulatory assets:
El Salvador tariff recoveries$59
 $54
 Quarterly as part of the tariff adjustment
El Salvador energy pass through costs recoveryEl Salvador energy pass through costs recovery$40 $56 Quarterly
Other60
 34
 VariousOther73 57 1 year
Total current regulatory assets119
 88
 Total current regulatory assets113 113 
Noncurrent regulatory assets:    Noncurrent regulatory assets:
IPL and DPL defined benefit pension obligations (1)
298
 316
 Various
IPL and DPL defined benefit pension obligations (1)
244 262 Various
IPL and DPL income taxes recoverable from customers (1)

 87
 Various
IPL environmental costsIPL environmental costs81 85 Various
IPL Petersburg Unit 1 retirement costsIPL Petersburg Unit 1 retirement costs75 Over life of assets
IPL deferred Midwest ISO costs102
 114
 9 yearsIPL deferred Midwest ISO costs61 75 6 years
IPL environmental costs48
 41
 Various
Other94
 97
 VariousOther126 108 Various
Total noncurrent regulatory assets542
 655
 Total noncurrent regulatory assets587 530 
TOTAL REGULATORY ASSETS$661
 $743
 
REGULATORY LIABILITIES    
Total regulatory assetsTotal regulatory assets$700 $643 
Regulatory liabilitiesRegulatory liabilities
Current regulatory liabilities:    Current regulatory liabilities:
DPL efficiency program costs$10
 $14
 Annually as part of the tariff adjustment
Overcollection of costs to be passed back to customersOvercollection of costs to be passed back to customers$47 $80 1 year
Other7
 27
 VariousOtherVarious
Total current regulatory liabilities17
 41
 Total current regulatory liabilities48 81 
Noncurrent regulatory liabilities:    Noncurrent regulatory liabilities:
IPL and DPL asset retirement obligations830
 795
 Over life of assets
IPL and DPL deferred income taxes243
 2
 Various
IPL and DPL accrued costs of removal and AROsIPL and DPL accrued costs of removal and AROs863 863 Over life of assets
IPL and DPL income taxes payable to customers through ratesIPL and DPL income taxes payable to customers through rates174 209 Various
Other6
 5
 VariousOther21 18 Various
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities1,079
 802
 Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities1,058 1,090 
TOTAL REGULATORY LIABILITIES$1,096
 $843
 
Total regulatory liabilitiesTotal regulatory liabilities$1,106 $1,171 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Past expenditures on which the Company earns a rate of return.
Past expenditures on which the Company earns a rate of return.
Our regulatory assets and current regulatory liabilities primarily consist of under or overcollection of costs that are generally non-controllable, such as purchased electricity, energy transmission, the difference between actual fuel costs, and the fuel costs recovered in the tariffs, and other sector costs. These costs are recoverable or refundable as defined by the laws and regulations in our various markets. Our regulatory assets also include defined pension and postretirement benefit obligations equal to the previously unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and prior servicesservice costs that are expected to be recovered through future rates. Additionally, our regulatory assets include the expected carrying value of IPL's Petersburg Unit 1 at its anticipated retirement date, which will be amortized over the life of the asset beginning on the date of retirement. Other current and noncurrent regulatory assets primarily consist of:
Demand chargesUndercollections on rate riders such as wholesale margin sharing and MISO costs at IPL and energy efficiency and storm costs at DPL;
Unamortized premiums reacquired or redeemed on long termlong-term debt at IPL and DPL, which are amortized over the lives of the original issuances; and
Unrecovered fuel and purchased powerOVEC costs at IPL and DPL.
Our noncurrent regulatory liabilities primarily consist of obligations for removal costs which do not have an associated legal retirement obligation. Our noncurrent regulatory liabilities also include deferred income taxes associated with the reduction of the U.S. federalrelated to differences in income recognition between tax ratelaws and accounting methods, which will be passed through to our regulated customers via a decrease in future retail rates, see Note 20—Income Taxes for further information.rates.
In the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, the current regulatory assets and liabilities are reflected in Other current assets and Accrued and other liabilities, respectively, and the noncurrent regulatory assets and liabilities are reflected in Other noncurrent assets and Other noncurrent liabilities, respectively. The following table summarizesAll of the regulatory assets and liabilities by reportable segment in millions as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are related to the periods indicated:US and Utilities SBU.

 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Regulatory Assets Regulatory Liabilities Regulatory Assets Regulatory Liabilities
US SBU$602
 $1,095
 $689
 $842
MCAC SBU59
 
 54
 
Brazil SBU
 1
 
 1
Total$661
 $1,096
 $743
 $843


153 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

10.11. DEBT
NON-RECOURSE DEBT — The following table summarizes the carrying amount and terms of non-recourse debt at our subsidiaries as of the periods indicated (in millions):
NON-RECOURSE DEBTWeighted Average Interest Rate Maturity December 31,NON-RECOURSE DEBTWeighted Average Interest RateMaturityDecember 31,
2017 201620202019
Variable Rate: (1)
    
Variable Rate:Variable Rate:
Bank loans4.52% 2018 – 2050 $2,488
 $2,601
Bank loans3.93%2021 – 2050$3,494 $3,389 
Notes and bonds8.06% 2020 – 2026 900
 471
Notes and bonds3.11%2023 – 2030800 1,056 
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (2)
3.28% 2023 – 2034 3,668
 3,189
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
1.67%2023 – 2033457 460 
Fixed Rate:    Fixed Rate:
Bank loans4.54% 2018 – 2040 993
 767
Bank loans4.72%2021 – 20402,965 2,900 
Notes and bonds5.68% 2019 – 2073 7,388
 7,822
Notes and bonds5.20%2021 – 20798,907 8,098 
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (2)
5.35% 2023 – 2034 271
 328
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
3.41%2021 – 202334 1,110 
Other5.81% 2018 – 2061 26
 30
Other4.20%206118 17 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net (394) (425)Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(321)(318)
Subtotal $15,340
 $14,783
Subtotal$16,354 $16,712 
Less: Current maturities(2) (2,164) (1,052)(1,426)(1,865)
Noncurrent maturities(2) $13,176
 $13,731
$14,928 $14,847 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)    Multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals, multilaterals, development banks and other similar institutions.
(2)    Excludes $4 million and $3 million (current) and $77 million and $67 million (noncurrent) finance lease liabilities included in the respective non-recourse debt line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 14—Leases for further information.
The interest rate on variable rate debt represents the total of a variable component that is based on changes in an interest rate index and of a fixed component. The Company has interest rate swaps and option agreements that economically fix the variable component of the interest rates on the portion of the variable rate debt being hedged in an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $2 billion on non-recourse debt outstanding at December 31, 2020.
The interest rate on variable rate debt represents the total of a variable component that is based on changes in an interest rate index and of a fixed component. The Company has interest rate swaps and option agreements in an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $3.6 billion on non-recourse debt outstanding at December 31, 2017. These agreements economically fix the variable component of the interest rates on the portion of the variable-rate debt being hedged so that the total interest rate on that debt has been fixed at rates ranging from approximately 2.49% to 8.00%. The debt agreements expire at various dates from 2018 through 2073.
(2)
Multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals, multilaterals, development banks and other similar institutions.
Non-recourse debt as of December 31, 20172020 is scheduled to reach maturity as shown below (in millions):
December 31,Annual MaturitiesDecember 31,Annual Maturities
2018$2,245
2019796
20201,396
20211,833
2021$1,439 
20221,768
2022516 
202320231,017 
202420241,307 
20252025996 
Thereafter7,696
Thereafter11,400 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(394)Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(321)
Total$15,340
Total$16,354 
As of December 31, 2017,2020, AES subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $1.8 billion$215 million of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs. Excluding these facilities under construction, AES subsidiaries had approximately $1.7 billion$868 million in a number of available butvarious unused committed credit lines to support their working capital, debt service reserves and other business needs. These credit lines can be used for borrowings, letters of credit, or a combination of these uses.


154 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Significant transactions — During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company's subsidiaries had the following significant debt transactions:
SubsidiaryTransaction PeriodIssuancesRepaymentsGain (Loss) on Extinguishment of Debt
Southland (1)
Q1, Q2, Q4$283 $(125)$(1)
AES BrasilQ2, Q3, Q4375 (1)
GenerQ1, Q290 (8)
DPL (2)
Q2, Q3555 (520)(34)
IPALCOQ2475 (470)(2)
Mong DuongQ2150 
Panama (3)
Q31,485 (1,228)(16)
CochraneQ3485 (445)(1)
AngamosQ3(309)(5)
Subsidiary Issuances Repayments Gain (Loss) on Extinguishment of Debt
IPALCO $608
  
$(528) $(9)
Tietê 585
 (293) (5)
Southland 557
 
 
Gener 335
  
(426) (20)
AES Argentina 310
 (181) 65
Los Mina 303
 (275) (4)
Colon 262
 
 
Masinloc 160
  
(51) 
DPL 103
  
(249) (3)
Other 285
 (547) (1)
Total $3,508
 $(2,550) $23
_____________________________
Southland — In(1)Issuances relate to the June 2017 AES Southland Energy LLC closed on $2 billion of aggregate principal long-term non-recourse debt financing to fund the Southland re-poweringrepowering construction projects (“the Southland financing”). The Southland financing consistsprojects.
(2)Includes transactions at DPL and its subsidiary, DP&L.
(3)Repayments relate to existing obligations at AES Panama, Changuinola, and Colon.
Panama — In August 2020, AES Panama issued $1.4 billion aggregate principal of $1.5 billion4.375% senior secured notes amortizing through 2040, and $492a $105 million senior secured term loan amortizing through 2027. The long-term debt financing has a combined weighted average

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

cost of approximately 4.5%. As of December 31, 2017, $557 million of the senior secured notes were outstanding under the Southland financing.
AES Argentina — In February 2017, AES Argentina issued $300 million aggregate principal of unsecured and unsubordinated notes due in 2024.2030 and 2023, respectively. The net proceeds from thisthe issuance were used for the prepayment of $75to prepay $447 million, $171 million, and $610 million of non-recourse debt related tooutstanding indebtedness at AES Panama, Changuinola, and Colon, respectively. As a result of these transactions, the construction of the San Nicolas Plant resulting inCompany recognized a gainloss on extinguishment of debt of approximately$16 million.
Cochrane — In November 2019, Cochrane issued $430 million aggregate principal of 5.50% senior unsecured notes due in 2027 and entered into a $445 million 6.25% senior secured facility agreement due in 2034. The net proceeds from the issuance and draw down were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $833 million under its variable rate notes due in 2030. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $24 million.
In July 2020, Cochrane issued $485 million aggregate principal of 6.25% senior secured notes due in 2034. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $445 million plus accrued interest on its senior secured facility agreement executed in 2019.
DPL — In April 2019, DPL issued $400 million aggregate principal of 4.35% senior unsecured notes due in 2029. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to redeem $400 million of the $780 million aggregate principal outstanding of its 7.25% senior unsecured notes due in 2021. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $43 million.
In June 2020, DPL issued $415 million aggregate principal of 4.125% senior secured notes due in 2025. In July 2020, the net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $380 million of its 7.25% senior unsecured notes due in 2021. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $34 million.
IPALCO — In April 2020, IPALCO issued $475 million aggregate principal of 4.25% senior secured notes due in 2030. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $405 million of its 3.45% senior unsecured notes and a $65 million term loan both due in July 2020. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2 million.
Gener — In March 2019, Gener issued $550 million aggregate principal of 7.125% senior unsecured notes due in 2079. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to purchase via tender offer the outstanding principal of $450 million of its 8.375% senior unsecured notes due in 2073.
In October 2019, Gener issued $450 million aggregate principal of 6.35% senior unsecured notes due in 2079. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to fund the acquisition of Los Cururos, purchase via tender offer $73 million and $55 million aggregate principal of its senior unsecured notes due in 2021 and 2025, respectively, and prepay the remaining outstanding principal of $119 million of its senior unsecured notes due in 2021. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $29 million.
Mong Duong — In August 2019, Mong Duong refinanced $1.1 billion aggregate principal of its existing senior secured notes due in 2029 with variable interest rates ranging from LIBOR + 2.25% to LIBOR + 4.15% in exchange for a fixed rate loan with a newly formed SPV, accounted for as an equity affiliate, due in 2029 with interest rates


155 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

that vary from 4.41% to 7.18%. This refinancing was a non-cash transaction as the SPV acquired all of the outstanding rights and obligations of the original Mong Duong lenders. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $31 million. As of December 31, 2020, Mong Duong met the held-for-sale criteria and the outstanding debt balances were reclassified to held-for-sale liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
DP&L — In June 2019, DP&L issued $425 million aggregate principal of 3.95% First Mortgage Bonds due in 2049. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $435 million under its variable rate $445 million credit agreement due in 2022.
Non-Recourse Debt Covenants, Restrictions and Defaults — The terms of the Company's non-recourse debt include certain financial and nonfinancial covenants. These covenants are limited to subsidiary activity and vary among the subsidiaries. These covenants may include, but are not limited to, maintenance of certain reserves and financial ratios, minimum levels of working capital and limitations on incurring additional indebtedness.
As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, approximately $642$587 million and $535$372 million, respectively, of restricted cash was maintained in accordance with certain covenants of the non-recourse debt agreements, and these amounts were included within Restricted cash and Debt service reserves and other deposits in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Various lender and governmental provisions restrict the ability of certain of the Company's subsidiaries to transfer their net assets to the Parent Company. Such restricted net assets of subsidiaries amounted to approximately $2.8$1.7 billion at December 31, 2017.2020.
The following table summarizes the Company's subsidiary non-recourse debt in default (in millions) as of December 31, 2017.2020. Due to the defaults, these amounts are included in the current portion of non-recourse debt:
Primary Nature
of Default
 December 31, 2017Primary Nature
of Default
December 31, 2020
SubsidiaryDefault Net AssetsSubsidiaryDebt in DefaultNet Assets
Alto Maipo (Chile)Covenant $618
 $352
AES Puerto RicoCovenant/Payment 365
 692
AES Puerto RicoCovenant$238 $171 
AES IluminaCovenant 36
 54
AES Ilumina (Puerto Rico)AES Ilumina (Puerto Rico)Covenant31 19 
AES Jordan SolarAES Jordan SolarCovenant
Total $1,019
  Total$276 
The amounts in default related to Puerto Rico are covenant and payment defaults. In November 2017, AES Puerto Rico signed Forbearance and Standstill Agreements with their lenders to prevent the lenders from taking action against the Company due to these default events. These agreements will expire on March 22, 2018.
All otherabove defaults listed are not payment defaults. All ofIn Puerto Rico, the subsidiary non-recourse debt defaults were triggered by failure to comply with covenants and/or conditions such as (but not limited to) failure to meet information covenants, complete construction or other milestones in an allocated time, meet certain minimum or maximum financial ratios, or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents due to the bankruptcy of the applicable subsidiary.offtaker.
The AES Corporation's recourse debt agreements include cross-default clauses that will trigger if a subsidiary or group of subsidiaries for which the non-recourse debt is in default provides 20% or more of the Parent Company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company hashad no defaults which resultresulted in or arewere at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Parent Company. In the event the Parent Company is not in compliance with the financial covenants of its senior secured revolving credit facility, restricted payments will be limited to regular quarterly shareholder dividends at the then-prevailing rate. Payment defaults and bankruptcy defaults would preclude the making of any restricted payments.



156 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

RECOURSE DEBT — The following table summarizes the carrying amount and terms of recourse debt of the Company as of the periods indicated (in millions):
Interest RateFinal MaturityDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Senior Unsecured Note4.00%2021500 
Senior Secured Term LoanLIBOR + 1.75%202218 
Senior Unsecured Note4.875%2023613 
Senior Unsecured Note4.50%2023500 
Drawings on revolving credit facilityLIBOR + 1.75%202470 180 
Senior Unsecured Note5.50%202463 
Senior Unsecured Note5.50%2025544 
Senior Unsecured Note3.30%2025900 
Senior Unsecured Note6.00%2026500 
Senior Unsecured Note1.375%2026800 
Senior Unsecured Note5.125%2027500 
Senior Unsecured Note3.95%2030700 
Senior Unsecured Note2.45%20311,000 
Other (1)
CDI + 7.00%202618 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(41)(22)
Subtotal$3,447 $3,396 
Less: Current maturities(1)(5)
Noncurrent maturities$3,446 $3,391 
 Interest Rate Final Maturity December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Senior Unsecured NoteLIBOR + 3.00% 2019 $
 $240
Senior Unsecured Note8.00% 2020 228
 469
Senior Unsecured Note7.38% 2021 690
 966
Drawings on secured credit facilityLIBOR + 2.00% 2021 207
 
Senior Secured Term LoanLIBOR + 2.00% 2022 521
 
Senior Unsecured Note4.88% 2023 713
 713
Senior Unsecured Note5.50% 2024 738
 738
Senior Unsecured Note5.50% 2025 573
 573
Senior Unsecured Note6.00% 2026 500
 500
Senior Unsecured Note5.13% 2027 500
 
Term Convertible Trust Securities6.75% 2029 
 517
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net    (40) (45)
Subtotal    $4,630
 $4,671
Less: Current maturities    (5) 
Noncurrent maturities    $4,625
 $4,671
_____________________________
(1)Represents project-level limited recourse debt at AES Holdings Brasil Ltda.
The following table summarizes the principal amounts due under our recourse debt for the next five years and thereafter (in millions):
December 31,Net Principal Amounts Due
2021$
2022
2023
202474 
2025903 
Thereafter2,504 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(41)
Total recourse debt$3,447 
December 31,Net Principal Amounts Due
2018$5
20195
2020234
2021902
2022500
Thereafter3,024
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(40)
Total recourse debt$4,630
During the first quarter of 2020, the Company drew $840 million on revolving lines of credit at the Parent Company, of which approximately $250 million was used to enhance our liquidity position due to the uncertain economic conditions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, and the remaining $590 million was used for other general corporate purposes. During the remainder of 2020, the Parent Company drew an additional $755 million and repaid $1.5 billion on these revolving lines of credit. The entire $250 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic was repaid during the second quarter of 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $70 million of outstanding indebtedness on the Parent Company credit facility at a weighted average interest rate of 1.86%.
In August 2017,May 2020, the Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.125% senior notes due in 2027. The Company used these proceeds to redeem at par $240$900 million aggregate principal of its existing LIBOR + 3.00%3.30% senior unsecured notes due in 20192025 and repurchased $217$700 million of its existing 8.00%3.95% senior unsecured notes due in 2020. As2030. The Company used the net proceeds from these issuances to purchase via tender offer a resultportion of the latter transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $36 million.
In May 2017, the Company closed on $525 million aggregate principal LIBOR + 2.00% secured term loan4.00%, 4.50%, and 4.875% senior notes due in 2022. In June 2017,2021, 2023, and 2023, respectively. Subsequent to the Company used these proceeds to redeem at par all $517 million aggregate principal of its existing Term Convertible Securities. As a result of the latter transaction, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $6 million.
In March 2017,tender offers, the Company redeemed via tender offers $276 million aggregate principalthe remaining balance of its existing 7.375%4.00% and 4.875% senior unsecured notes due in 2021 and $242023, respectively, and $7 million of its existing 8.00%the remaining 4.50% senior unsecured notes due in 2020.2023. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $47$37 million.
In July 2016,December 2020, the Company redeemed in full the $181issued $800 million balanceaggregate principal of its 8.00% outstanding1.375% senior unsecured notes due 2017 usingin 2026 and $1 billion aggregate principal of 2.45% senior unsecured notes due in 2031. The Company used the net proceeds from these issuances to purchase via tender offer the remaining balance of its 5.50%, 6.00%, and 5.125% senior secured credit facility.notes due 2025, 2026, and 2027, respectively. Subsequent to the tender offers, the Company redeemed the remaining balance of its 4.50% and 5.50% notes due 2023 and 2024, respectively. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $16$108 million.
In May 2016,September 2019, the Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% senior notes due 2026. The Company used these proceeds to redeem, at par, $495prepaid $343 million aggregate principal of its existing LIBOR + 3.00%1.75% existing senior secured term loan due in 2022 and $100 million of its 4.875% senior unsecured notes due 2019.in 2023. As a result of the latter transaction,these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $4$5 million.
In January 2016, the Company redeemed $125 million of its senior unsecured notes outstanding. The repayment included a portion of the 7.375% senior notes due in 2021, the 4.875% senior notes due in 2023, the 5.5% senior notes due in 2024, the 5.5% senior notes due in 2025 and the floating rate senior notes due in 2019. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $7 million.


157 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Recourse Debt Covenants and Guarantees — The Company's obligations under the senior securedrevolving credit facility and indentures governing the senior secured term loannotes due 2025 and 2030 are currently unsecured following the achievement of two investment grade ratings and the release of security in accordance with the terms of the facility and the notes. If the Company’s credit rating falls below "Investment Grade" from at least two of Fitch Investors Service Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., as determined in accordance with the terms of the revolving credit facility and indenture dated May 15, 2020 (BBB-, or in the case of Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. Baa3), then the obligations under the revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the senior notes due 2025 and 2030 become, subject to certain exceptions, secured by (i) all of the capital stock of

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

domestic subsidiaries owned directly by the Company or certain subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain foreign subsidiaries owned directly or indirectly by the Company; Company and certain subsidiaries,and (ii) certain intercompany receivables, certain intercompany notes and certain intercompany tax sharing agreements.
The senior securedrevolving credit facility and senior secured term loan is subject to mandatory prepayment under certain circumstances, including the sale of certain assets. In such a situation, a portion of the net cash proceeds from the sale must be applied pro rata to repay loans outstanding under the term loan,revolving credit facility and certain other indebtedness, if any, using 60% of net cash proceeds, reducedsubject to 50% when and if the parent's recourse debt to cash flow ratio is less than 5:1. The lenders have the option to waive their pro rata redemption.customary reinvestment rights.
The senior securedrevolving credit facility contains customary covenants and restrictions on the Company's ability to engage in certain activities, including, but not limited to, limitations on other indebtedness, liens, investments and guarantees; limitations on restricted payments such as shareholder dividends and equity repurchases; restrictions on mergers and acquisitions, sales of assets, leases, transactions with affiliates and off-balance sheet or derivative arrangements; and other financial reporting requirements.
The senior securedrevolving credit facility also contains financial covenants, evaluated quarterly, requiring the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of adjusted operating cash flow to interest charges on recourse debt of 1.32.5 times and a maximum ratio of recourse debt to adjusted operating cash flow of 7.55.75 times.
The terms of the Company's senior unsecured notes and senior secured term loan contain certain customary covenants, including without limitation, limitationlimitations on the Company's ability to incur liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions.
TERM CONVERTIBLE TRUST SECURITIES — In 1999, AES Trust III, a wholly-owned special purpose business trust and a VIE, issued approximately 10.35 million of $50 par value TECONS with a quarterly coupon payment of $0.844 for total proceeds of $517 million and concurrently purchased $517 million of 6.75% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures due 2029 (the "6.75% Debentures") issued by AES. AES, at its option, may redeem the 6.75% Debentures which would result in the required redemption of the TECONS issued by AES Trust III for $50 per TECON. As of December 31, 2016, the sole assets of AES Trust III were the 6.75% Debentures. In June 2017, the Company redeemed the 6.75% Debentures and redeemed at par all remaining aggregate principal of its existing TECONs.
11.12. COMMITMENTS
LEASES — The Company enters into long-term non-cancelable lease arrangements which, for accounting purposes, are classified as either operating or capital leases. Operating leases primarily include certain transmission lines, office rental and site leases. Operating lease rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $61 million, $61 million and $45 million, respectively. Capital leases primarily include transmission lines, vehicles, offices, and other operating equipment. Capital leases are recognized in Property, Plant and Equipment within Electric generation, distribution assets and other. The gross value of the capital lease assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $27 million and $22 million, respectively. The following table shows the future minimum lease payments under operating and capital leases for continuing operations together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 2017 for 2018 through 2022 and thereafter (in millions):
 Future Commitments for
December 31,Capital Leases Operating Leases
2018$2
 $58
20191
 58
20201
 58
20211
 59
20221
 58
Thereafter12
 644
Total$18
 $935
Less: Imputed interest(10)  
Present value of total minimum lease payments$8
  
CONTRACTS The Company enters into long-term contracts for construction projects, maintenance and service, transmission of electricity, operations services and purchasepurchases of electricity and fuel. In general, these contracts are subject to variable quantities or prices and are terminable only in limited circumstances. The following table shows the future minimum commitments for continuing operations under these contracts as of December 31,

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

2017 2020 for 20182021 through 20222025 and thereafter as well as actual purchases under these contracts for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018 (in millions):
Actual purchases during the year ended December 31,Electricity Purchase ContractsFuel Purchase ContractsOther Purchase Contracts
2018$827 $1,838 $1,671 
20191,597 1,824 1,684 
2020756 1,573 1,506 
Future commitments for the year ending December 31,
2021$700 $1,370 $1,904 
2022500 815 636 
2023447 609 605 
2024434 495 570 
2025434 457 526 
Thereafter5,037 1,445 1,816 
Total$7,552 $5,191 $6,057 
Actual purchases during the year ended December 31,Electricity Purchase Contracts Fuel Purchase Contracts Other Purchase Contracts
2015$545
 $1,262
 $1,833
2016420
 1,790
 817
2017747
 1,619
 1,945
Future commitments for the year ending December 31,     
2018$581
 $1,759
 $1,488
2019508
 1,051
 931
2020440
 591
 470
2021469
 538
 234
2022438
 454
 547
Thereafter2,065
 1,466
 1,314
Total$4,501
 $5,859
 $4,984
12.13. CONTINGENCIES
Guarantees and Letters of Credit In connection with certain project financings, acquisitions and dispositions, power purchases, and other agreements, the Parent Company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. In the normal course of business, the Parent Company has entered into various agreements, mainly guarantees and letters of credit, to provide financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of AES businesses. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise achieved by a business on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the availability of sufficient credit to accomplish


158 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

their intended business purposes. Most of the contingent obligations relate to future performance commitments which the Company expectsor its businesses expect to fulfill within the normal course of business. The expiration dates of these guarantees vary from less than one year to no more than 1715 years.
The following table summarizes the Parent Company's contingent contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017.2020. Amounts presented in the following table represent the Parent Company's current undiscounted exposure to guarantees and the range of maximum undiscounted potential exposure. The maximum exposure is not reduced by the amounts, if any, that could be recovered under the recourse or collateralization provisions in the guarantees. There were no5 obligations made by the Parent Company for the direct benefit of the lenders associated with the non-recourse debt of its businesses.
Contingent Contractual ObligationsAmount (in millions)Number of AgreementsMaximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)
Guarantees and commitments$1,358 69$0 — 157
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facilities110 25$0 — 56
Letters of credit under the revolving credit facility77 17$0 — 62
Surety bond1$1
Total$1,546 112
Contingent Contractual Obligations Amount (in millions) Number of Agreements Maximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)
Guarantees and commitments $815
 21 $1 — 272
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facility 52
 4 $2 — 26
Asset sale related indemnities (1)
 27
 1 27
Letters of credit under the senior secured credit facility 36
 21 <$1 — 13
Total $930
 47  
_____________________________
(1)
Excludes normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 0.25%1% to 2.25%3% per annum on the outstanding amounts of letters of credit.
Environmental — The Company periodically reviews its obligations as they relate to compliance with environmental laws, including site restoration and remediation. As ofFor the periods ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019, the Company had recognized liabilities of $5 million and $9$4 million respectively, for projected environmental remediation costs.costs, respectively. Due to the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future costs of compliance or remediation could be higher or lower than the amount currently accrued. Moreover, where no liability has been recognized, it is reasonably possible that the Company may be required to incur remediation costs or make expenditures in amounts that could be material but could not be estimated as of December 31, 2017.2020. In aggregate, the Company estimates that the range of potential losses related to environmental matters, where estimable, to be up to $18$12 million. The amounts considered reasonably possible do not include amounts accrued as discussed above.
Litigation The Company is involved in certain claims, suits and legal proceedings in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for litigation and claims when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has recognized aggregate liabilities for all claims of approximately $50$28 million and $59$55 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. These amounts are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accrued and other liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities. A significant portion of these accrued liabilities relate to regulatory matters and commercial disputes in international jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that these accrued liabilities will be adequate to cover all existing and future claims or that we will have the liquidity to pay such claims as they arise.
Where no accrued liability has been recognized, it is reasonably possible that some matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company and could require the Company to pay damages or make expenditures in amounts that could be material but could not be estimated as of December 31, 2017.2020. The material contingencies where a loss is reasonably possible primarily include claims under financing agreements; disputes with offtakers, suppliers and EPC contractors; alleged breaches of contract; alleged violation of monopoly laws and regulations; income tax and non-income tax matters with tax authorities; and regulatory matters. In aggregate, the Company estimates that the range of potential losses, where estimable, related to these reasonably possible material contingencies to be between $140$245 million and $173$933 million. The amounts considered reasonably possible do not include the amounts accrued, as discussed above. These material contingencies do not include income tax-related contingencies which are considered part of our uncertain tax positions.
Tietê GSF Settlement— In December 2020, ANEEL published a regulation establishing the terms and conditions for compensation to Tietê for the non-hydrological risk charged to hydro generators through the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 until 2018. In accordance with the regulation, this compensation will be in the form of a concession extension period of approximately 2.6 years. As a result, the previously recognized contingent liabilities related to GSF payments were updated to reflect the Company's best estimate for the fair value of compensation to be received from the concession extension offered in conjunction with the regulation. This compensation was estimated to have a fair value of $184 million, and was recorded as a reversal of Non-RegulatedCost of Sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The concession extension also met the criteria for
13.


159 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

recognition as a definite-lived intangible asset, which will be amortized from the date of the agreement until the end of the new concession period. The value of the concession extension is based on a preliminary time-value equivalent calculation made by the CCEE and subsequent adjustments requested by Tietê, which has been determined to be fair value. Both the concession extension period and its equivalent asset value are subject to a final agreement between ANEEL and AES.
14. LEASES
LESSEE — Right-of-use assets are long-term by nature. The following table summarizes the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to lease asset and liability balances as of the periods indicated (in millions):
Consolidated Balance Sheet ClassificationDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets
Right-of-use assets — finance leasesElectric generation, distribution assets and other$74 $67 
Right-of-use assets — operating leasesOther noncurrent assets275 248 
Total right-of-use assets$349 $315 
Liabilities
Finance lease liabilities (current)Non-recourse debt (current liabilities)$$
Finance lease liabilities (noncurrent)Non-recourse debt (noncurrent liabilities)77 67 
Total finance lease liabilities81 70 
Operating lease liabilities (current)Accrued and other liabilities17 16 
Operating lease liabilities (noncurrent)Other noncurrent liabilities293 261 
Total operating lease liabilities310 277 
Total lease liabilities$391 $347 
The following table summarizes supplemental balance sheet information related to leases as of the periods indicated:
Lease Term and Discount RateDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Weighted-average remaining lease term — finance leases31 years32 years
Weighted-average remaining lease term — operating leases23 years23 years
Weighted-average discount rate — finance leases4.11 %4.99 %
Weighted-average discount rate — operating leases6.81 %6.99 %
The following table summarizes the components of lease expense recognized in Cost of Sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Components of Lease Cost20202019
Operating lease cost$36 $46 
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets
Interest on lease liabilities
Short-term lease costs13 38 
Variable lease cost
Total lease cost$56 $89 
Operating cash outflows from operating leases included in the measurement of lease liabilities were $41 million and $48 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and operating cash outflows from finance leases were $2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities were $37 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.


160 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The following table shows the future lease payments under operating and finance leases for continuing operations together with the present value of the net lease payments as of December 31, 2020 for 2021 through 2025 and thereafter (in millions):
Maturity of Lease Liabilities
Finance LeasesOperating Leases
2021$$29 
202229 
202328 
202427 
202525 
Thereafter134 507 
Total157 645 
Less: Imputed interest(76)(335)
Present value of lease payments$81 $310 
LESSOR — The Company has operating leases for certain generation contracts that contain provisions to provide capacity to a customer, which is a stand-ready obligation to deliver energy when required by the customer. Capacity payments are generally considered lease elements as they cover the majority of available output from a facility. The allocation of contract payments between the lease and non-lease elements is made at the inception of the lease. Lease payments from such contracts are recognized as lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term, whereas variable lease payments are recognized when earned.
The following table presents lease revenue from operating leases in which the Company is the lessor for the periods indicated (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Lease Income20202019
Total Lease Revenue$580 $600 
Less: Variable Lease Payments66 70 
Total Non-Variable Lease Revenue$514 $530 
The following table presents the underlying gross assets and accumulated depreciation of operating leases included in Property, Plant and Equipment for the periods indicated (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Lease Income20202019
Gross Assets$3,103 $2,909 
Accumulated Depreciation1,011 707 
Net Assets$2,092 $2,202 
The option to extend or terminate a lease is based on customary early termination provisions in the contract, such as payment defaults, bankruptcy, and lack of performance on energy delivery. The Company has not recognized any early terminations as of December 31, 2020. Certain leases may provide for variable lease payments based on usage or index-based (e.g., the U.S. Consumer Price Index) adjustments to lease payments.
The following table shows the future lease receipts as of December 31, 2020 for 2021 through 2025 and thereafter (in millions):
Future Cash Receipts for
Sales-Type LeasesOperating Leases
2021$$489 
2022475 
2023411 
2024412 
2025412 
Thereafter39 1,034 
Total52 $3,233 
Less: Imputed interest(24)
Present value of total lease receipts$28 
Battery Storage Lease Arrangements — The Company is constructing and operating projects that pair BESS with solar energy systems, which allows the project more flexibility on when to provide energy to the grid. The Company will enter into PPAs for the full output of the facility that allow customers the ability to determine when to charge and discharge the BESS. These arrangements include both lease and non-lease elements under ASC 842, with the BESS component constituting a sales-type lease. Upon commencement of the lease, the book value of the


161 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

leased asset is removed from the balance sheet and a net investment in sales-type lease is recognized based on the present value of fixed payments under the contract and the residual value of the underlying asset. Due to the variable nature of lease payments under these contracts, the Company recorded losses at commencement of sales-type leases of $36 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. These amounts are recognized in Other expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 21—Other Income and Expense for further information. The Company recognized lease income on sales-type leases through variable payments of $5 million and interest income of $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
15. BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plan The Company sponsors four4 defined contribution plans ("the DC Plans"). Two plans cover U.S. non-union employees; one1 for Parent Company and certain US and Utilities SBU business employees, and one1 for DPL employees. The remaining two plans include union and non-union employees at IPL and union employees at DPL. The DC Plans are qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. Most U.S. employees of the Company are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan except for those employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, unless such agreement specifically provides that the employee is considered an eligible employee under a plan. Within the DC Plans, the Company provides matching contributions in addition to other non-matching contributions. Participants are fully vested in their own contributions. The Company's contributions vest over various time periods ranging from immediate up to five years. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, costs for defined contribution plans were approximately $23$21 million, $15$19 million and $18$21 million, respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans — Certain of the Company's subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their respective employees ("the DB Plans"). Pension benefits are based on years of credited service, age of the participant, and average earnings. Of the 3128 active DB Plans as of December 31, 2017, five2020, 5 are at U.S. subsidiaries and the remaining plans are at foreign subsidiaries.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

The following table reconciles the Company's funded status, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated (in millions):
20202019
U.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
CHANGE IN PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
Benefit obligation as of January 1$1,242 $224 $1,118 $417 
Service cost12 11 
Interest cost35 14 44 19 
Employee contributions
Plan amendments
Plan curtailments(6)
Plan settlements
Benefits paid(81)(9)(65)(9)
Plan combinations
Divestitures(244)
Actuarial (gain) loss122 19 134 37 
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes(30)(4)
Benefit obligation as of December 31$1,331 $218 $1,242 $224 
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1$1,154 $129 $1,026 $410 
Actual return on plan assets168 13 185 19 
Employer contributions
Employee contributions
Plan settlements
Benefits paid(81)(9)(65)(9)
Divestitures(296)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes(26)
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31$1,249 $112 $1,154 $129 
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDED STATUS
Funded status as of December 31$(82)$(106)$(88)$(95)


  2017 2016
  U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
CHANGE IN PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Benefit obligation as of January 1 $1,188
 $411
 $1,172
 $374
Service cost 13
 10
 13
 9
Interest cost 41
 22
 42
 21
Employee contributions 
 1
 
 1
Plan amendments 1
 (1) 
 (4)
Plan curtailments 3
 
 2
 
Plan settlements 
 (2) 
 
Benefits paid (71) (22) (60) (19)
Actuarial loss 82
 29
 19
 58
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes 
 22
 
 (29)
Benefit obligation as of December 31 $1,257
 $470
 $1,188
 $411
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:        
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1 $1,044
 $402
 $1,021
 $379
Actual return on plan assets 141
 31
 61
 59
Employer contributions 13
 18
 22
 18
Employee contributions 
 1
 
 1
Plan settlements 
 (2) 
 
Benefits paid (71) (22) (60) (19)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes 
 27
 
 (36)
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31 $1,127
 $455
 $1,044
 $402
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDED STATUS        
Funded status as of December 31 $(130) $(15) $(144) $(9)
162 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The following table summarizes the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the funded status of the DB Plans, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2017 2016December 31,20202019
Amounts Recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets U.S. Foreign U.S. ForeignAmounts Recognized on the Consolidated Balance SheetsU.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Noncurrent assets $
 $69
 $
 $60
Noncurrent assets$$$$
Accrued benefit liability—current 
 (6) 
 (5)Accrued benefit liability—current(8)(7)
Accrued benefit liability—noncurrent (130) (78) (144) (64)Accrued benefit liability—noncurrent(91)(98)(88)(88)
Net amount recognized at end of year $(130) $(15) $(144) $(9)Net amount recognized at end of year$(82)$(106)$(88)$(95)
The following table summarizes the Company's U.S. and foreign accumulated benefit obligation as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,20202019
U.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$1,306 $199 $1,224 $188 
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation$494 $218 $1,242 $197 
Accumulated benefit obligation481 199 1,224 178 
Fair value of plan assets403 112 1,154 114 
Information for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation$494 $218 $1,242 $224 
Fair value of plan assets403 112 1,154 129 
December 31,2017 2016
 U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$1,236
 $433
 $1,167
 $384
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:       
Projected benefit obligation$1,257
 $109
 $1,188
 $90
Accumulated benefit obligation1,236
 97
 1,167
 80
Fair value of plan assets1,127
 33
 1,044
 25
Information for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:       
Projected benefit obligation$1,257
 $238
 $1,188
 $212
Fair value of plan assets1,127
 154
 1,044
 142
The following table summarizes the significant weighted average assumptions used in the calculation of benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated:
December 31, 2017 2016 December 31,20202019
 U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign U.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Benefit Obligation:Discount rate3.67% 5.23% 4.28% 5.83% Benefit Obligation:Discount rate2.45 %7.53 %3.32 %7.58 %
Rate of compensation increase3.34% 4.65% 3.34% 4.86% Rate of compensation increase2.75 %5.69 %3.33 %6.11 %
Periodic Benefit Cost:Discount rate4.28% 5.83%
(1) 
4.44% 6.10%
(1) 
Periodic Benefit Cost:Discount rate3.32 %7.58 %(1)4.35 %5.62 %(1)
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.67% 5.30% 6.67% 5.09% Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets5.24 %7.18 %5.08 %4.10 %
Rate of compensation increase3.34% 4.86% 3.34% 4.45% Rate of compensation increase2.86 %6.13 %3.34 %4.78 %
_____________________________
(1)
Includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost, but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

(1)Includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost, but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation.
The Company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors, which include the targeted asset allocation percentages, historic returns, and expected future returns.
The measurement of pension obligations, costs, and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions. These assumptions include estimates of the present value of projected future pension payments to all plan participants, taking into consideration the likelihood of potential future events such as salary increases and demographic experience. These assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions.
The assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors: discount rates;rates, salary growth;growth, retirement rates; inflation;rates, inflation, expected return on plan assets;assets, and mortality rates. The effects of actual results differing from the Company's assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect the Company's recognized expense in such future periods. Unrecognized gains or losses are amortized using the “corridor approach,” under which the net gain or loss in excess of 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of the assets, if applicable, is amortized.
Sensitivity of the Company's pension funded status to the indicated increase or decrease in the discount rate and long-term rate of return on plan assets assumptions is shown below. Note that these sensitivities may be asymmetric and are specific to the base conditions at year-end 2017.2020. They also may not be additive, so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown. The funded status as of December 31, 20172020 is affected by the assumptions as of that date. Pension expense for 20172020 is affected by the December 31, 20162019 assumptions. The impact on pension expense from a one percentage point change in these assumptions is shown in the following table (in millions):
Increase of 1% in the discount rate$(9)
Decrease of 1% in the discount rate
Increase of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets(12)
Decrease of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets12 


Increase of 1% in the discount rate $(13)
Decrease of 1% in the discount rate 12
Increase of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets (15)
Decrease of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets 15
163 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic benefit cost, both domestic and foreign, for the years indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2017 2016 2015December 31,202020192018
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost: U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign U.S. ForeignComponents of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:U.S.ForeignU.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Service cost $13
 $10
 $13
 $9
 $16
 $10
Service cost$12 $$11 $$15 $12 
Interest cost 41
 23
 42
 21
 48
 23
Interest cost35 14 44 19 40 22 
Expected return on plan assets (69) (21) (68) (19) (70) (20)Expected return on plan assets(58)(7)(52)(14)(64)(17)
Amortization of prior service cost 6
 
 7
 (1) 7
 
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net loss 18
 2
 18
 2
 20
 2
Amortization of net loss14 15 18 
Curtailment loss recognized 4
 
 4
 
 
 
Curtailment loss recognized
Settlement loss recognizedSettlement loss recognized
Total pension cost $13
 $14
 $16
 $12
 $21
 $15
Total pension cost$$15 $23 $14 $15 $24 
The following table summarizes in millions the amounts reflected in AOCL, including AOCL attributable to noncontrolling interests, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017,2020, that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost and amounts expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next fiscal year (in millions):
December 31, 2017Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Amounts expected to be reclassified to earnings in next fiscal year
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
U.S. Foreign U.S. ForeignU.S.Foreign
Prior service cost$(1) $1
 $
 $
Prior service cost$(3)$
Unrecognized net actuarial loss(22) (81) (2) (3)Unrecognized net actuarial loss(34)(69)
Total$(23) $(80) $(2) $(3)Total$(37)$(68)
The following table summarizes the Company's target allocation for 20172020 and pension plan asset allocation, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated:
     Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 Target Allocations 2017 2016
Asset CategoryU.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
Equity securities33% 4% 31.90% 4.61% 50.96% 18.66%
Debt securities65% 93% 64.53% 93.10% 45.88% 78.35%
Real estate2% —% 3.20% 0.44% 3.16% 0.75%
Other—% 3% 0.37% 1.85% % 2.24%
Total pension assets    100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,
Target Allocations20202019
Asset CategoryU.S.ForeignU.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Equity securities41%13%43.79 %14.85 %32.22 %15.37 %
Debt securities57%82%55.87 %82.30 %67.17 %81.67 %
Real estate2%2%%1.12 %0.22 %1.16 %
Other0%3%0.34 %1.73 %0.39 %1.80 %
Total pension assets100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %
The U.S. DB Plans seek to achieve the following long-term investment objectives:
maintenance of sufficient income and liquidity to pay retirement benefits and other lump sum payments;
long-term rate of return in excess of the annualized inflation rate;
long-term rate of return, net of relevant fees, that meets or exceeds the assumed actuarial rate; and
long-term competitive rate of return on investments, net of expenses, that equals or exceeds various benchmark rates.
The asset allocation is reviewed periodically to determine a suitable asset allocation which seeks to manage risk through portfolio diversification and takes into account the above-stated objectives, in conjunction with current funding levels, cash flow conditions, and economic and industry trends. The following table summarizes the Company's U.S. DB Plan assets by category of investment and level within the fair value hierarchy as of the periods indicated (in millions):
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
U.S. Plans Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalU.S. PlansLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equity securities:Mutual funds$359
 $
 $
 $359
 $532
 $
 $
 $532
Debt securities:Government debt securities135
 
 
 135
 86
 
 
 86
Equity securities: (2)
Equity securities: (2)
Mutual funds$$547 $$547 $$372 $$372 
Mutual funds (1)
593
 
 
 593
 393
 
 
 393
Debt securities: (2)
Debt securities: (2)
Mutual funds (1)
698 698 775 775 
Real estate:(2)Real estate
 36
 
 36
 
 33
 
 33
Real estate
Other:Cash and cash equivalents4
 
 
 4
 
 
 
 
Other:Cash and cash equivalents
Total plan assets$1,091
 $36
 $
 $1,127
 $1,011
 $33
 $
 $1,044
Total plan assets$$1,245 $$1,249 $$1,150 $$1,154 
_____________________________
(1)Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
(2)In 2019, the U.S. plans moved all investments except cash and cash equivalents into collective trusts; therefore, the balances under the equity securities, debt securities, and real estate categories shown above represent investments through collective trusts. The plans have chosen collective trusts for which the underlying investments are mutual funds, mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment, or real estate in alignment with the target asset allocation.


(1)
Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.164 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The investment strategy of the foreign DB Plans seeks to maximize return on investment while minimizing risk. The assumed asset allocation has less exposure to equities in order to closely match market conditions and near term forecasts. The following table summarizes the Company's foreign DB plan assets by category of investment and level within the fair value hierarchy as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Foreign PlansForeign PlansLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equity securities:Equity securities:Mutual funds$16 $$$16 $19 $$$19 
Private equity
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Foreign Plans Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Equity securities:Mutual funds$20
 $
 $
 $20
 $71
 $
 $
 $71
Debt securities:Debt securities:Government debt securities
Private equity
 
 1
 1
 
 
 4
 4
Debt securities:Government debt securities11
 
 
 11
 10
 
 
 10
Mutual funds (1)
18 74 92 17 88 105 
Mutual funds (1)
323
 90
 
 413
 215
 90
 
 305
Real estate:Real estate
 
 2
 2
 
 
 3
 3
Real estate:Real estate
Other:
Participant loans (2)

 
 
 
 
 
 2
 2
Other:Cash and cash equivalents
Other assets1
 
 7
 8
 4
 
 3
 7
Total plan assets$355
 $90
 $10
 $455
 $300
 $90
 $12
 $402
Other assets
Total plan assets$35 $74 $$112 $37 $88 $$129 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
(2)
Loans to participants are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
The following table summarizes the estimated cash flows for U.S. and foreign expected employer contributions and expected future benefit payments, both domestic and foreign (in millions):
U.S.Foreign
Expected employer contribution in 2021$$15 
Expected benefit payments for fiscal year ending:
202170 15 
202271 13 
202371 14 
202471 16 
202572 17 
2026 - 2030354 105 
16. REDEEMABLE STOCK OF SUBSIDIARIES
The following table is a reconciliation of changes in redeemable stock of subsidiaries (in millions):
December 31,20202019
Balance at the beginning of the period$888 $879 
Contributions from holders of redeemable stock of subsidiaries10 
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries(7)
Fair value adjustment
Other comprehensive loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries(28)
Balance at the end of the period$872 $888 
The following table summarizes the Company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,20202019
IPALCO common stock$618 $618 
Colon quotas (1)
194 210 
IPL preferred stock60 60 
Total redeemable stock of subsidiaries$872 $888 
 _____________________________
(1)Characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock.
Colon — Our partner in Colon made capital contributions of $10 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. NaN contributions were made in 2020. Any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner, or measure the investment at fair value, will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable.
IPL — IPL had $60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, which represents 5 series of preferred stock. The total annual dividend requirements were approximately $3 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $100 and $118 per share. Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of IPL's board of directors if IPL has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for 4 consecutive quarters. Based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of IPL's board of directors in this circumstance, the


165 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

  U.S. Foreign
Expected employer contribution in 2018 $39
 $15
Expected benefit payments for fiscal year ending:    
2018 71
 23
2019 73
 23
2020 74
 25
2021 75
 26
2022 76
 27
2023 - 2027 380
 170
redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity.
14.17. EQUITY
Equity Transactions with Noncontrolling Interests
Alto Maipo SouthlandEnergy— In March 2017, AES GenerNovember 2020, the Company completed the legal and financial restructuringsale of Alto Maipo. As part35% of this restructuring, AES indirectly acquired the 40%its ownership interest of the noncontrolling shareholder, for a de minimis payment, and sold a 6.7% interest in the projectSouthland Energy assets for $424 million, which decreased the Company's economic interest to 65%. However, under the construction contractor.terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company is entitled to all earnings or losses until March 1, 2021, and any distributions related thereto. This transaction resulted in a $196$275 million increase to thein Parent Company’s Stockholders’Company Stockholder's Equity due to an increase in additional paid-in-capital of $266 million, net of tax and transaction costs, and the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from AOCL to NCI of $9 million. As the Company maintained control after the sale, Southland Energy continues to be consolidated by the Company within the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.

Cochrane — In September 2020, AES Gener completed the sale of a portion of its stake in Cochrane. The transaction included the issuance of preferred shares and the sale of 5% of its stake in the subsidiary for $113 million, which decreased the Company’s economic interest in Cochrane to 38%. The preferred shareholders have the preferential right to receive an annual amount equal to $12 million, from any dividends or distributions of capital, until reaching the original investment of $113 million plus a specified rate of return. In November 2020, Cochrane distributed $12 million to the preferred shareholders. As the Company maintained control after the sale, Cochrane continues to be consolidated by the Company within the South America SBU reportable segment.
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

BrasilIn August 2020, AES Holdings Brasil Ltda. ("AHB") completed the acquisition of $229an additional 18.5% ownership in AES Brasil for $240 million. During the fourth quarter of 2020, through multiple transactions, AHB acquired another 1.3% ownership in AES Brasil for $16 million. In aggregate, these transactions increased the Company’s economic interest in AES Brasil to 44.1% and resulted in a $214 million offset bydecrease in Parent Company Stockholders’ Equity due to a decrease in additional paid-in-capital of $94 million and the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from NCI to AOCL of $120 million. AES Brasil is reported in the Parent Company Stockholders’ Equity of $33 million. No gain or loss was recognized in net income as the sale was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate. After completion of the sale, the Company has an effective 62% economic interest in Alto Maipo. As the Company maintained control of the partnership after the sale, Alto Maipo continues to be consolidated by the Company within the AndesSouth America SBU reportable segment.
Dominican Republic Distributed Energy As part of a purchase agreement executed in 2014, EstrellaIn 2020, 2019 and Linda Groups, an investor-based group in the Dominican Republic, had options to acquire additional2018, Distributed Energy, through multiple transactions, sold noncontrolling interests in our businesses in the Dominican Republic. In December 2015, Estrella and Linda Groups exercised their first call optionmultiple project companies to acquire an additional 2% of our businesses in the Dominican Republic for $18 million, resulting in a net increase of $7 million to additional paid-in-capital. No gain or loss was recognized in net income as the sale was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate. After exercising this option, Estrella and Linda Groups held a 10% interest in our businesses in the Dominican Republic. Estrella and Linda Groups had a final option to acquire an additional 10% of our businesses in the Dominican Republic for $125 million which expired in December 2017.
In September 2017, Linda Group acquired 5% of our Dominican Republic business for $60 million, pre-tax. This transactiontax equity partners. These transactions resulted in a net$144 million, $133 million, and $98 million increase of $25 million to the Company’s additional paid-in-capital and noncontrolling interest in 2020, 2019, and 2018 respectively. No gain or loss was recognized in net income as the sale was not considered a sale of in-substance real estate. As the Company maintained control after the sale, our businessesDistributed Energy is reported in the Dominican Republic continue to be consolidated by the Company within the MCACUS and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Jordan — In February 2016, the Company completed the sale of 40% of its interest in a wholly-owned subsidiary in Jordan that owns a controlling interest in the Jordan IPP4 gas-fired plant for $21 million. The transaction was accounted for as a sale of in-substance real estate and a pre-tax gain of $4 million, net of transaction costs, was recognized in net income. The cash proceeds from the sale are reflected in Proceeds from the sale of businesses, net of cash sold on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended December 31, 2016. After completion of the sale, the Company has a 36% economic interest in Jordan IPP4 and continues to manage and operate the plant, with 40% owned by Mitsui Ltd. and 24% owned by Nebras Power Q.S.C. As the Company maintained control after the sale, Jordan IPP4 continues to be consolidated by the Company within the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Brazil Reorganization — In 2015, the Company completed a restructuring of Tietê. This transaction resulted in no change of ownership or control. The $27 million impact of this equity transaction was recognized in additional paid-in-capital.
Gener — In November 2015, the Company sold a 4% stake in AES Gener S.A. ("Gener") through its 99.9% owned subsidiary Inversiones Cachagua S.p.A ("Cachagua") for $145 million, net of transaction costs. The sale was of previously issued common shares of Gener to certain institutional investors and is not a sale of in-substance real estate. While the sale decreased Parent ownership interest from 70.7% to 66.7%, the Parent continues to retain its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. The difference of $24 million between the fair value of the consideration received, net of taxes and transaction costs, and the amount by which the NCI is adjusted was recognized in additional paid-in-capital. No pre-tax gain or loss was recognized in net income as a result of this transaction.
The following table summarizes the net income attributable to The AES Corporation and all transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,
202020192018
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation$46 $303 $1,203 
Transfers from noncontrolling interest:
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in capital for sale of subsidiary shares260 (5)(3)
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in-capital for purchase of subsidiary shares(89)
Net transfers (to) from noncontrolling interest171 (5)(3)
Change from net income attributable to The AES Corporation and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests$217 $298 $1,200 


  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $(1,161) $(1,130) $306
Transfers from noncontrolling interest:      
Net increase in The AES Corporation's paid-in capital for sale of subsidiary shares 13
 84
 323
Additional paid-in-capital, IPALCO shares, transferred to redeemable stock of subsidiaries (1)
 
 (84) (377)
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in-capital for purchase of subsidiary shares 240
 (2) 
Net transfers (to) from noncontrolling interest 253
 (2) (54)
Change from net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests $(908) $(1,132) $252
_____________________________
(1)
See Note17—Redeemable stock of subsidiariesfor further information on increase in paid-in-capital transferred166 | Notes to redeemable stock of subsidiaries.
Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Deconsolidations
UK Wind — During 2016, the Company determined it no longer had control of its wind development projects in the United Kingdom (“UK Wind”) as the Company no longer held seats on the board of directors. In accordance with accounting guidance, UK Wind was deconsolidated and a loss on deconsolidation of $20 million was recorded to Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations to write off the Company’s noncontrolling interest in the project. The UK Wind projects were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — The changes in AOCL by component, net of tax and noncontrolling interests, for the periods indicated were as follows (in millions):
 Foreign currency translation adjustment, net Unrealized derivative losses, net Unfunded pension obligations, net Total
Balance at December 31,2015$(3,256) $(353) $(274) $(3,883)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications117
 2
 (13) 106
Amount reclassified to earnings992
 28
 1
 1,021
Other comprehensive income (loss)$1,109
 $30
 $(12) $1,127
Balance at December 31, 2016$(2,147) $(323) $(286) $(2,756)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications$18
 $(14) $(19) $(15)
Amount reclassified to earnings643
 37
 248
 928
Other comprehensive income$661
 $23
 $229
 $913
Reclassification from NCI due to Alto Maipo Restructuring
 (33) 
 (33)
Balance at December 31, 2017$(1,486) $(333) $(57) $(1,876)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, netDerivative gains (losses), netUnfunded pension obligations, netTotal
Balance at December 31, 2018$(1,721)$(300)$(50)$(2,071)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(23)(202)(15)(240)
Amount reclassified to earnings23 36 27 86 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(166)12 (154)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle(4)(4)
Balance at December 31, 2019$(1,721)$(470)$(38)$(2,229)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(309)(12)(321)
Amount reclassified to earnings192 72 264 
Other comprehensive income (loss)192 (237)(12)(57)
Reclassification from NCI due to share sales and repurchases(115)(4)(111)
Balance at December 31, 2020$(1,644)$(699)$(54)$(2,397)
Reclassifications out of AOCL are presented in the following table. Amounts for the periods indicated are in millions and those in parenthesis indicate debits to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Details AboutDecember 31,
AOCL ComponentsAffected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations202020192018
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests$(192)$(23)$19 
Net gain from disposal of discontinued operations
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(192)$(23)$21 
Derivative gains (losses), net
Non-regulated revenue$(1)$(1)$(6)
Non-regulated cost of sales(3)(12)(3)
Interest expense(60)(26)(49)
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests
Asset impairment expense(10)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)(7)(12)(59)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates(81)(50)(117)
Income tax benefit (expense)17 13 24 
Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates(10)(5)
Income (loss) from continuing operations(74)(42)(93)
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries15 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(72)$(36)$(78)
Amortization of defined benefit pension actuarial losses, net
Regulated cost of sales$(1)$$
Non-regulated cost of sales
Other expense(2)(6)
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests(26)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates(28)(6)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Income (loss) from continuing operations(28)(4)
Net gain (loss) from disposal of discontinued operations(2)
Net income (loss)(28)(6)
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(1)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$$(27)$(7)
Total reclassifications for the period, net of income tax and noncontrolling interests$(264)$(86)$(64)
Details About   December 31,
AOCL Components Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations 2017 2016 2015
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net    
  Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses $(188) $
 $
  Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued operations (455) (992) 
  Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $(643) $(992) $
Unrealized derivative gains (losses), net    
  Non-regulated revenue $25
 $111
 $43
  Non-regulated cost of sales (12) (57) (14)
  Interest expense (79) (107) (112)
  Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses 
 
 (4)
  Foreign currency transaction gains 15
 8
 12
  Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates (51) (45) (75)
  Income tax expense 1
 8
 11
  Net equity in earnings of affiliates 
 
 (2)
  Income (loss) from continuing operations (50) (37) (66)
  Less: (Income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 13
 9
 18
  Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $(37) $(28) $(48)
Amortization of defined benefit pension actuarial losses, net    
  Non-regulated cost of sales 1
 
 2
  General and administrative expenses (1) (1) (2)
  Other expense 
 (1) 
  Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates 
 (2) 
  Income tax expense 
 3
 9
  Income from continuing operations 
 1
 9
  Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued operations (266) (11) (25)
  Net income (loss) (266) (10) (16)
  Less: (Income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 
 9
 14
  Add: Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 18
 
 
  Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $(248) $(1) $(2)
Total reclassifications for the period, net of income tax and noncontrolling interests $(928) $(1,021) $(50)
Common Stock Dividends — The Parent Company paid dividends of $0.12$0.1433 per outstanding share to its common stockholders during the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 20172020 for dividends declared in December 2016,2019, February 2020, July 2020, and October 2017,2020, respectively.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

On December 8, 2017,4, 2020, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.13$0.1505 per share payable on February 15, 201812, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2018.January 29, 2021.
Stock Repurchase Program — No shares were repurchased in 2017.2020. The cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the Stock Repurchase Program in July 2010 through December 31, 20172020 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $1.9 billion, at an average price per share of $12.12 (including a nominal amount of


167 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

commissions). As of December 31, 2017, $2462020, $264 million remained available for repurchase under the Stock Repurchase Program.
The common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method. A total of 155,924,785153,028,526 and 156,878,891153,891,260 shares were held as treasury stock at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,December 31, 2019, respectively. Restricted stock units under the Company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock. The Company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the Stock Repurchase Program in July 2010.
15.18. SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The segment reporting structure uses the Company's organizationalmanagement reporting structure as its foundation to reflect how the Company manages the businesses internally and is mainly organized by geographic regions which provides a socio-political-economic understanding of our business. During the third quarter of 2017, the Europe and Asia SBUs were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the Eurasia SBU. The management reporting structure is organized by five4 SBUs led by our President and Chief Executive Officer: US Andes, Brazil,and Utilities, South America, MCAC, and Eurasia SBUs. TheUsing the accounting guidance on segment reporting, the Company determined that it has fiveits 4 operating and fivesegments are aligned with its 4 reportable segments corresponding to its SBUs. All prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure. In February 2018, we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio, optimize our cost structure, and reduce our carbon intensity. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure.
Corporate and OtherCorporateIncluded in "Corporate and Other" are the results of the AES self-insurance company and certain equity affiliates, corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five4 reportable segments, are included in "Corporate and Other." Also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation.
The Company uses Adjusted PTC as its primary segment performance measure. Adjusted PTC, a non-GAAP measure, is defined by the Company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions;transactions and equity securities; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, losses, and associated benefits and costs due toassociated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures;closures, and gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; and (f) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations, and office consolidation.consolidation; and (g) net gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence. Adjusted PTC also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities. The Company has concluded Adjusted PTC better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company and is the most relevant measure considered in the Company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments. Additionally, given its large number of businesses and complexity, the Company concluded that Adjusted PTC is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the Company's results.    
Revenue and Adjusted PTC are presented before inter-segment eliminations, which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest, charges for certain management fees, and the write-off of intercompany balances, as applicable. All intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment. Inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results.
The following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated (in millions):
Total RevenueTotal Revenue
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015Year Ended December 31,202020192018
US SBU$3,229
 $3,429
 $3,593
Andes SBU2,710
 2,506
 2,489
Brazil SBU542
 450
 962
US and Utilities SBUUS and Utilities SBU$3,918 $4,058 $4,230 
South America SBUSouth America SBU3,159 3,208 3,533 
MCAC SBU2,448
 2,172
 2,353
MCAC SBU1,766 1,882 1,728 
Eurasia SBU1,590
 1,670
 1,875
Eurasia SBU828 1,047 1,255 
Corporate and Other35
 77
 31
Corporate and Other231 46 41 
Eliminations(24) (23) (43)Eliminations(242)(52)(51)
Total Revenue$10,530
 $10,281
 $11,260
Total Revenue$9,660 $10,189 $10,736 

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015


Reconciliation from Income from Continuing Operations before Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Affiliates:Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates$771
 $187
 $989
Add: Net equity earnings in affiliates71
 36
 105
Less: Income from continuing operations before taxes, attributable to noncontrolling interests(521) (354) (513)
Pre-tax contribution321
 (131) 581
Unrealized derivative gains(3) (9) (166)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(59) 22
 95
Disposition/acquisition (gains) losses123
 6
 (42)
Impairment losses542
 933
 504
Loss on extinguishment of debt62
 29
 179
Restructuring costs (1)
31
 
 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,017
 $850
 $1,151
_____________________________
(1)
One-time restructuring charges consisting of severance costs related168 | Notes to workforce reductions.Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

 Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
US SBU$361
 $347
 $360
Andes SBU386
 390
 482
Brazil SBU60
 38
 92
MCAC SBU340
 267
 327
Eurasia SBU290
 283
 331
Corporate and Other(420) (475) (441)
Total Adjusted PTC$1,017
 $850
 $1,151
Reconciliation from Income from Continuing Operations before Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Affiliates:Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,202020192018
Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates$488 $1,001 $2,018 
Add: Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates(123)(172)39 
Less: Income from continuing operations before taxes, attributable to noncontrolling interests(192)(277)(509)
Pre-tax contribution173 552 1,548 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses (gains)113 33 
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)(10)36 51 
Disposition/acquisition losses (gains)112 12 (934)
Impairment losses928 406 307 
Loss on extinguishment of debt223 121 180 
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(182)
Total Adjusted PTC$1,247 $1,240 $1,185 
Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,202020192018
US and Utilities SBU$505 $569 $511 
South America SBU534 504 519 
MCAC SBU287 367 300 
Eurasia SBU177 159 222 
Corporate and Other(256)(347)(346)
Eliminations(12)(21)
Total Adjusted PTC$1,247 $1,240 $1,185 
Total AssetsDepreciation and AmortizationCapital Expenditures
Year Ended December 31,202020192018202020192018202020192018
US and Utilities SBU$14,464 $13,334 $12,286 $534 $465 $449 $1,099 $1,484 $1,373 
South America SBU11,329 11,314 10,941 294 315 300 650 692 662 
MCAC SBU4,847 4,770 4,462 164 183 141 183 344 302 
Eurasia SBU3,621 3,990 4,538 63 67 99 30 51 
Corporate and Other342 240 294 13 15 14 19 
Total$34,603 $33,648 $32,521 $1,068 $1,045 $1,003 $1,960 $2,551 $2,396 
Interest IncomeInterest Expense
Year Ended December 31,202020192018202020192018
US and Utilities SBU$17 $18 $10 $371 $301 $287 
South America SBU64 95 92 237 285 283 
MCAC SBU14 22 20 157 142 124 
Eurasia SBU171 180 186 113 127 145 
Corporate and Other160 195 217 
Total$268 $318 $310 $1,038 $1,050 $1,056 
Investments in and Advances to AffiliatesNet Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates
Year Ended December 31,202020192018202020192018
US and Utilities SBU$568 $465 $538 $(8)$11 $35 
South America SBU13 77 213 (80)(129)15 
MCAC SBU168 107 (11)(13)(7)
Eurasia SBU215 293 (9)14 
Corporate and Other85 102 65 (28)(32)(18)
Total$835 $966 $1,114 $(123)$(172)$39 


 Total Assets Depreciation and Amortization Capital Expenditures
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
US SBU$9,852
 $9,333
 $9,800
 $437
 $471
 $443
 $858
 $809
 $861
Andes SBU8,840
 8,971
 8,594
 250
 218
 175
 443
 538
 949
Brazil SBU2,034
 1,516
 1,179
 51
 33
 39
 34
 31
 47
MCAC SBU5,532
 5,162
 4,820
 172
 165
 155
 482
 480
 201
Eurasia SBU4,557
 5,777
 6,200
 127
 149
 166
 211
 279
 131
Assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses2,034
 4,936
 5,411
 123
 128
 146
 315
 303
 252
Corporate and Other263
 429
 541
 9
 12
 20
 13
 18
 17
Total$33,112
 $36,124
 $36,545
 $1,169
 $1,176
 $1,144
 $2,356
 $2,458
 $2,458
169 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

 Interest Income Interest Expense
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
US SBU$
 $
 $
 $258
 $236
 $262
Andes SBU50
 57
 77
 205
 178
 154
Brazil SBU45
 38
 31
 92
 69
 58
MCAC SBU18
 11
 30
 168
 163
 179
Eurasia SBU130
 139
 116
 167
 179
 158
Corporate and Other1
 
 2
 280
 309
 334
Total$244
 $245
 $256
 $1,170
 $1,134
 $1,145
 Investments in and Advances to Affiliates Net Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
US SBU$527
 $23
 $1
 $41
 $9
 $
Andes SBU358
 363
 345
 28
 15
 83
MCAC SBU3
 (1) 
 (4) (2) 
Eurasia SBU307
 236
 248
 9
 13
 18
Corporate and Other2
 
 16
 (3) 1
 4
Total$1,197
 $621
 $610
 $71
 $36
 $105

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

The following table presents information, by country, about the Company's consolidated operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, and as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in millions). Revenue is recorded in the country in which it is earned and assets are recorded in the country in which they are located.
Total Revenue Property, Plant & Equipment, netTotal Revenue
Long-Lived Assets (1)
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2017 2016Year Ended December 31,20202019201820202019
United States$3,240
 $3,489
 $3,597
 $7,403
 $7,397
United States (2)
United States (2)
$3,243 $3,230 $3,462 $10,360 $9,762 
Non-U.S.:         Non-U.S.:
Chile1,944
 1,707
 1,523
 5,066
 4,995
Chile2,092 1,839 2,087 5,831 5,982 
Dominican Republic826
 614
 632
 935
 914
Dominican Republic896 877 884 843 1,006 
El Salvador686
 601
 736
 340
 327
El Salvador666 824 768 361 351 
PanamaPanama519 601 438 1,939 1,945 
BulgariaBulgaria444 459 426 1,149 1,106 
Brazil541
 450
 962
 1,286
 789
Brazil401 525 527 1,091 1,266 
Philippines449
 401
 406
 
 866
ColombiaColombia358 472 428 355 340 
MexicoMexico349 402 399 623 649 
Argentina435
 359
 399
 223
 195
Argentina308 373 487 484 393 
Bulgaria367
 334
 382
 1,290
 1,174
Mexico352
 342
 383
 687
 699
Panama338
 312
 297
 1,615
 1,233
Colombia332
 437
 557
 332
 451
Vietnam (3)
Vietnam (3)
285 343 245 
Jordan (4)
Jordan (4)
96 95 95 44 
United Kingdom(5)328
 337
 396
 108
 151
147 390 
Vietnam (1)
278
 340
 233
 2
 1
Puerto Rico247
 301
 302
 565
 583
Jordan95
 136
 248
 431
 452
Kazakhstan67
 103
 155
 
 178
Philippines (6)
Philippines (6)
93 
Other Non-U.S.5
 18
 52
 13
 10
Other Non-U.S.23 20 
Total Non-U.S.7,290
 6,792
 7,663
 12,893
 13,018
Total Non-U.S.6,417 6,959 7,274 12,743 13,060 
Total$10,530
 $10,281
 $11,260
 $20,296
 $20,415
Total$9,660 $10,189 $10,736 $23,103 $22,822 
_____________________________
(1)
The Mong Duong II power project is accounted for as a service concession arrangement. Costs of construction of the plant have been deferred in Service concession assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(1)     For purposes of this disclosure, long-lived assets implies hard assets that cannot be readily removed, and thus excludes intangibles. Long-lived assets disclosed above include amounts recorded in Property, plant and equipment, net and right-of-use assets for operating leases recorded in Other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
16.(2)     Includes Puerto Rico revenues of $298 million, $294 million, and $257 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, and long-lived assets of $533 million and $538 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(3)     The Mong Duong 2 power project is operated under a BOT contract. Future expected payments for the construction performance obligation are recognized in Loan receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019. Mong Duong assets were classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2020. See Notes 20—Revenue and 25—Held-For-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
(4)     The long-lived assets in Jordan were classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2020, Jordan solar assets were reclassified back to held-and-used. See Note 25—Held-For-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
(5)     The Kilroot and Ballylumford long-lived assets were deconsolidated upon completion of the sale in June 2019. See Note 25—Held-For-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
(6)     The Masinloc long-lived assets were deconsolidated upon completion of the sale in March 2018. See Note 25—Held-For-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
19. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
RESTRICTED STOCK
Restricted Stock Units — The Company issues restricted stock units ("RSUs")RSUs under its long-term compensation plan. The RSUs are generally granted based upon a percentage of the participant's base salary. The units have a three-year vesting schedule and vest in one-third increments over the three-year period. In all circumstances, RSUs granted by AES do not entitle the holder the right, or obligate AES, to settle the RSU in cash or other assets of AES.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, RSUs issued had a grant date fair value equal to the closing price of the Company's stock on the grant date. The Company does not discount the grant date fair values to reflect any post-vesting restrictions. RSUs granted to employees during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018 had grant date fair values per RSU of $11.93, $9.42$20.75, $17.53, and $12.03,$10.55, respectively.
The following table summarizes the components of the Company's stock-based compensation related to its employee RSUs recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements (in millions):
December 31, 2017 2016 2015December 31,202020192018
RSU expense before income tax $17
 $14
 $13
RSU expense before income tax$10 $10 $11 
Tax benefit (4) (4) (3)Tax benefit(2)(1)(2)
RSU expense, net of tax $13
 $10
 $10
RSU expense, net of tax$$$
Total value of RSUs converted (1)
 $10
 $7
 $16
Total value of RSUs converted (1)
$11 $12 $10 
Total fair value of RSUs vested $15
 $13
 $12
Total fair value of RSUs vested$10 $10 $16 
_____________________________
(1)Amount represents fair market value on the date of conversion.


(1)
Amount represents fair market value on the date of conversion.170 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Cash was not used to settle RSUs or compensation cost capitalized as part of the cost of an asset for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015.2018. As of December 31, 2017,2020, total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs of $17$12 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.8 years. There were no modifications to RSU awards during the year ended December 31, 2017.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

2020.
A summary of the activity of RSUs for the year ended December 31, 20172020 follows (RSUs in thousands):
RSUsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair ValuesWeighted Average Remaining Vesting Term
 RSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Values Weighted Average Remaining Vesting Term
Non-vested at December 31, 2016 3,037
 $10.70
 
Nonvested at December 31, 2019Nonvested at December 31, 20191,484 $13.73 
Vested (1,337) 11.37
 Vested(806)12.95 
Forfeited and expired (280) 10.94
 Forfeited and expired(47)15.71 
Granted 1,546
 11.93
  Granted579 20.75 
Non-vested at December 31, 2017 2,966
 $11.02
 1.4
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017 2,711
 $11.01
 
Nonvested at December 31, 2020Nonvested at December 31, 20201,210 $17.53 1.4
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2020Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 20201,104 $17.35 
The Company initially recognizes compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. In 2017,2020, AES has estimated a weighted average forfeiture rate of 10.35%7.23% for RSUs granted in 2017.2020. This estimate will be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments forfeited is likely to differ from previous estimates. Based on the estimated forfeiture rate, the Company expects to expense $17$11 million on a straight-line basis over a three-year period.
The following table summarizes the RSUs that vested and were converted during the periods indicated (RSUs in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015Year Ended December 31,202020192018
RSUs vested during the year 1,337
 1,063
 954
RSUs vested during the year806 996 1,428 
RSUs converted during the year, net of shares withheld for taxes 865
 705
 1,238
RSUs converted during the year, net of shares withheld for taxes547 666 950 
Shares withheld for taxes 472
 358
 549
Shares withheld for taxes259 329 478 
OTHER SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has three other share-based award programs. The Company has recorded expenses of $8$21 million, $10$22 million, and $8$20 million for 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively, related to these programs.
Stock options — AES grants options to purchase shares of common stock under stock option plans to employees and non-employee directors. Under the terms of the plans, the Company may issue options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to 100% of the market price at the date the option is granted. Stock options issued in 20152018, 2019, and 2020 have a three-year vesting schedule and vest in one-third increments over the three-year period. The stock options have a contractual term of ten10 years. In all circumstances, stock options granted by AES do not entitle the holder the right, or obligate AES, to settle the stock option in cash or other assets of AES.
Performance Stock Units — In 2015, 20162018, 2019, and 2017,2020, the Company issued performance stock units ("PSUs")PSUs to officers under its long-term compensation plan. PSUs are restricted stock units; certain units awarded include a market condition and the remaining awardswhich include performance conditions. Performance conditions are based on the Company's Adjusted EBITDA targets for 2015 andProportional Free Cash Flow targets for 20162018 and 2017.2019. For 2020, performance conditions are based on the units subject to market conditions, the total stockholder return on AES common stock must exceed the total stockholder return of the Standard and Poor's 500 Utilities Sector Index over a three-year measurement period.Company’s Parent Free Cash Flow target. The market and performance conditions determine the vesting and final share equivalent per PSU and can result in earning an award payout range of 0% to 200%, depending on the achievement. The Company believes that it is probable that the performance condition will be met and will continue to be evaluated throughout the performance period. In all circumstances, PSUs granted by AES do not entitle the holder the right, or obligate AES, to settle the RSUstock units in cash or other assets of AES.
Performance Cash Units — In 20162018, 2019, and 2017,2020, the Company issued Performance Cash Units ("PCUs")PCUs to its officers under its long-term compensation plan. The value of thesethe 2018 and 2019 units dependsis dependent on the market condition of total stockholder return on AES common stock as compared to the total stockholder return of the Standard and Poor's 500 Utilities Sector Index, Standard and Poor's 500 Index, and MSCI Emerging Market Index over a three-year measurement period. The value for the 2020 units is dependent on the market condition of total stockholder return on AES common stock as compared to the total stockholder return of the Standard and Poor's 500 Utilities Sector Index, Standard and Poor's 500 Index, and MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index over a three-year measurement period. Since PCUs are settled in cash, they qualify for liability accounting and periodic measurement is required.


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015


171 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
17. REDEEMABLE STOCK OF SUBSIDIARIES
20. REVENUE
The following table is a reconciliation of changes in redeemable stock of subsidiaries (in millions):
December 31,2017 2016
Balance at the beginning of the period$782
 $538
Sale of redeemable stock of subsidiaries
 134
Contributions from holders of redeemable stock of subsidiaries50
 130
Net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries(14) (11)
Fair value adjustment (1)
25
 4
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries(2) 6
Acquisition and reclassification of stock of subsidiaries(4) (19)
Balance at the end of the period$837
 $782
 _____________________________
(1)
$5 million increase in fair value of DP&L preferred shares offset by $1 million decrease in fair value of Colon common stock in 2016.
The following table summarizes the Company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as ofpresents our revenue from contracts with customers and other revenue for the periods indicated (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2020
US and Utilities SBUSouth America SBUMCAC SBUEurasia SBUCorporate, Other and EliminationsTotal
Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,626 $$$$$2,626 
Other regulated revenue35 35 
Total regulated revenue2,661 2,661 
Non-Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers1,015 3,151 1,668 594 (10)6,418 
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
242 98 234 (1)581 
Total non-regulated revenue1,257 3,159 $1,766 828 (11)6,999 
Total revenue$3,918 $3,159 $1,766 $828 $(11)$9,660 
December 31,2017 2016
IPALCO common stock$618
 $618
Colon quotas (1)
159
 100
IPL preferred stock60
 60
Other common stock
 4
Total redeemable stock of subsidiaries$837
 $782
Year Ended December 31, 2019
US and Utilities SBUSouth America SBUMCAC SBUEurasia SBUCorporate, Other and EliminationsTotal
Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,979 $$$$$2,979 
Other regulated revenue49 49 
Total regulated revenue3,028 $$3,028 
Non-Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers767 3,205 1,788 $799 (4)$6,555 
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
263 94 248 (2)606 
Total non-regulated revenue1,030 $3,208 1,882 $1,047 (6)$7,161 
Total revenue$4,058 $3,208 $1,882 $1,047 $(6)$10,189 
Year Ended December 31, 2018
US and Utilities SBUSouth America SBUMCAC SBUEurasia SBUCorporate, Other and EliminationsTotal
Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,885 $$$$$2,885 
Other regulated revenue54 54 
Total regulated revenue2,939 $$2,939 
Non-Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers972 3,529 1,642 $943 (11)$7,075 
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
319 86 312 722 
Total non-regulated revenue1,291 $3,533 1,728 $1,255 (10)$7,797 
Total revenue$4,230 $3,533 $1,728 $1,255 $(10)$10,736 
_____________________________
(1)
Characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock.
Colon(1)Other non-regulated revenue primarily includes lease and derivative revenue not accounted for under ASC 606.
Contract BalancesOur partnerThe timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in Colon made capital contributions of $50accounts receivable and contract liabilities. The contract liabilities from contracts with customers were $531 million and $106$117 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner, or measure the investment at fair value, will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable.
IPL — IPL had $60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, which represent five series of preferred stock. The total annual dividend requirements were approximately $3 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $100 and $118 per share. Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of IPL's board of directors if IPL has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters. Based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of IPL's board of directors in this circumstance, the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity.
DPL — DPL had $18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2015, for which redemption became probable2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized revenue of $14 million and $13 million, respectively, that was included in September 2016. As such, the Company recorded an adjustment of $5 million to retained earnings to adjustcorresponding contract liability balance at the preferred shares to their redemption value of $23 million. In October 2016, DPL redeemed all of its preferred shares. Upon redemption, the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rightsbeginning of the shareholdersperiods.
In August 2020, AES Gener reached an agreement with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence to early terminate two PPAs of DPL ceased to exist.
IPALCO — In February 2015, CDPQ purchased 15% ofthe Angamos coal-fired plant in Chile, further accelerating AES US Investment, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPALCO, for $247 million, with an option to invest an additional $349 million in IPALCO through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% equity stake. In April 2015, CDPQ invested an additional $214 million in IPALCO, which resulted in CDPQ's combined direct and indirect interest in IPALCO of 24.90%.Gener's decarbonization strategy. As a result of these transactions, $84the termination payment, Angamos recognized a contract liability of $655 million, of which $55 million will be derecognized each month through the end of the remaining performance obligation in taxesAugust 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the remaining contract liability is $383 million.
A significant financing arrangement exists for our Mong Duong plant in Vietnam. The plant was constructed under a BOT contract and will be transferred to the Vietnamese government after the completion of a 25 year PPA. The performance obligation to construct the facility was substantially completed in 2015. Approximately $1.4 billion of contract consideration related to the construction, but not yet collected through the 25 year PPA, was reflected as


172 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

a loan receivable as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, Mong Duong met the held-for-sale criteria and the loan receivable balance of $1.3 billion, net of CECL reserve of $32 million, was reclassified to held-for-sale assets. Of the loan receivable balance, $80 million was classified as Current held-for-sale assets and $1.2 billion was classified as Noncurrent held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Remaining Performance Obligations — The transaction costs were recognized as a net decreaseprice allocated to equity. The Company also recognized an increaseremaining performance obligations represents future consideration for unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations at the end of the reporting period. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to additional paid-in-capital and a reduction to retained earningsremaining performance obligations was $11 million, primarily consisting of $377 millionfixed consideration for the excesssale of renewable energy credits in long-term contracts in the U.S. We expect to recognize revenue on approximately one-fifth of the fair value ofremaining performance obligations in 2021 and 2022, with the shares over their book value. No gain or loss wasremainder recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate.thereafter.
In March 2016, CDPQ exercised its remaining option by investing $134 million in IPALCO, which resulted in CDPQ's combined direct and indirect interest in IPALCO of 30%. The Company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in-capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value. In June 2016, CDPQ contributed an additional $24 million to IPALCO, with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment. Any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

CDPQ will be classified as NCI within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable.
18.21. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE
Other Income Other income generally includes gains on insurance recoveries in excess of property damage, gains on asset sales and liability extinguishments, favorable judgments on contingencies, gains on contract terminations, allowance for funds used during construction, and other income from miscellaneous transactions. The components are summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Legal settlements (1)
$60
 $
 $
Allowance for funds used during construction (US Utilities)26
 29
 17
Gain on sale of assets1
 4
 17
Contract termination
 
 20
Other33
 31
 30
Total other income$120
 $64
 $84
_____________________________
(1)
In December 2016, the Company and YPF entered into a settlement in which all parties agreed to give up any and all legal action related to gas supply contracts that were terminated in 2008 and have been in dispute since 2009. In January 2017, the YPF board approved the agreement and paid the Company $60 million, thereby resolving all uncertainties around the dispute.
Other Expense Other expense generally includes losses on asset sales and dispositions, losses on legal contingencies, defined benefit plan non-service costs, and losses from other miscellaneous transactions. The components are summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202020192018
Other Income
Gain on sale of assets (1)
$46 $$
Gain on insurance proceeds (2)
118 
Gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration (3)
32 
AFUDC (US Utilities)
Other24 24 32 
Total other income$75 $145 $72 
Other Expense
Loss on sale of receivables (4)
$20 $$
Legal contingencies and settlements15 
Loss on sale and disposal of assets (5)
22 30 
Non-service pension and other postretirement costs17 10 
Loss on commencement of sales-type leases (6)
36 
Allowance for other receivables
Other
Total other expense$53 $80 $58 
_____________________________
(1)Primarily associated with the gain on sale of Redondo Beach land at Southland. See Note 25Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
(2)Associated with recoveries for property damage at the Andres facility in the Dominican Republic from a lightning incident in September 2018 and the upgrade of the tunnel lining at Changuinola.
(3)Related to the amendment of the Oahu purchase agreement. See Note 26—Acquisitionsfor further information.
(4)Associated with a loss on sale of Stabilization Fund receivables at Gener. See Note 7—Financing Receivables for further information.
(5)Associated with a loss due to the upgrade of the tunnel lining at Changuinola in 2019 and a loss due to damage from a lightning incident at the Andres facility in the Dominican Republic in September 2018.
(6)Related to losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at Distributed Energy. See Note 14—Leasesfor further information.
22. ASSET IMPAIRMENT EXPENSE
Year ended December 31, (in millions)202020192018
AES Gener$781 $$
Hawaii38 60 
Estrella del Mar I30 
Kilroot and Ballylumford115 
Shady Point157 
Nejapa37 
Other15 10 14 
Total$864 $185 $208 
AES GenerIn August 2020, AES Gener reached an agreement with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence to early terminate two PPAs of the Angamos coal-fired plant in Chile, further accelerating AES Gener’s decarbonization strategy. AES Gener also announced its intention to accelerate the retirement of the Ventanas 1 and Ventanas 2 coal-fired plants. Management will no longer be pursuing a contracting strategy for these assets and the plants will primarily be utilized as peaker plants and for grid stability. Due to these developments, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amounts of these asset groups were


Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Allowance for other receivables (1)
$
 $52
 $
Loss on sale and disposal of assets28
 12
 
Water rights write-off19
 6
 10
Other10
 9
 14
Total other expense$57
 $79
 $24
 _____________________________
(1)
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we recognized a full allowance on a non-trade receivable in the MCAC SBU as a result of payment delays173 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and discussions with the counterparty. The allowance relates to certain reimbursements the Company was expecting in connection with a legal matter. Management believes the counterparty is obligated to pay and plans to continue to attempt to fully collect the non-trade receivable.2018
19. ASSET IMPAIRMENT EXPENSE

Year ended December 31, (in millions) 2017 2016 2015
DPL $175
 $859
 $
Laurel Mountain 121
 
 
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric 92
 
 
Kazakhstan CHPs 94
 
 
Kilroot 37
 
 121
Buffalo Gap II 
 159
 
Buffalo Gap I 
 77
 
Buffalo Gap III 
 
 116
U.K. Wind 
 
 37
Other 18
 1
 11
Total $537
 $1,096
 $285
not recoverable. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $781 million. AES Gener is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Laurel Mountain Hawaii During the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Laurel Mountain, a wind farmcoal-fired asset in Hawaii. Uncertainty around the ability to contract the asset upon expiration of its existing PPA resulted in management's decision to reassess the economic useful life of the generation facility. A decrease in the U.S. Impairment indicators wereuseful life was identified based on a decline in forward pricing. Theas an impairment indicator and the Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The Laurel Mountain asset group, consisting of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, was determined to have a fair value of $33 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense of $121 million. Laurel Mountain is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.
Kilroot — During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Kilroot, a coal and oil-fired plant in Northern Ireland, as Kilroot was not successful in bidding its coal units into the December 2017 capacity auction for the newly implemented I-SEM market. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset group was not recoverable. The Kilroot asset group was determined to have a fair value of $20 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense of $37 million, which was limited to the carrying value of the coal units. Kilroot is reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

During 2015, the Company tested the recoverability of long-lived assets at Kilroot when the regulator established lower capacity prices for the I-SEM. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset group was not recoverable. The Kilroot asset group was determined to have a fair value of $70$103 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $121 million. Kilroot is reported$60 million as of December 31, 2019.
In July 2020, the Hawaii State Legislature passed Senate Bill 2629 which will prohibit AES Hawaii from generating electricity from coal after December 31, 2022. Therefore, management further reassessed the economic useful life of the generation facility and a decrease in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric — In April 2017, the Republic of Kazakhstan stated the concession agreements would not be extended for Shulbinsk HPP and Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP, two hydroelectric plants in Kazakhstan, and initiated the process to transfer these plants back to the government. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in the second quarter of 2017, the Company performeduseful life was identified as an impairment analysis and determined the carrying value of the asset group of $190 million, which included cumulative translation losses of $100 million, was greater than its fair value less costs to sell of $92 million. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $92 million limited to the carrying value of the long-lived assets. The Company completed the transfer of the plants in October 2017. Prior to their transfer, the Kazakhstan hydroelectric plants were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
Kazakhstan CHPs — In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of Ust-Kamenogorsk CHP and Sogrinsk CHP, its combined heating and power coal plants in Kazakhstan. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in the first quarter of 2017, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying value of the asset group of $171 million, which included cumulative translation losses of $92 million, was greater than its fair value less costs to sell of $29 million. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $94 million limited to the carrying value of the long-lived assets. The Company completed the sale of its interest in the Kazakhstan CHP plants in April 2017. Prior to their sale, the plants were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
DPL — In March 2017, the Board of Directors of DPL approved the retirement of the DPL operated and co-owned Stuart coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units, and the Killen coal-fired generating unit and combustion turbine on or before June 1, 2018.indicator. The Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amountsamount of the facilities wereasset group was not recoverable. The Stuart and Killen asset groups were determined to have fair values of $3 million and $8 million, respectively, using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized totaladditional asset impairment expense of $66 million. DPL$38 million during the third quarter of 2020. Hawaii is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Estrella del Mar I — In August 2020, the Estrella del Mar I power barge was disconnected from the Panama grid and AES Panama is currently evaluating its options for the asset. Upon disconnection, the Company concluded that the barge was no longer part of the AES Panama asset group and performed an impairment analysis. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset was not recoverable and recognized asset impairment expense of $30 million. The asset met the held-for-sale criteria as of December 2017, DPL31, 2020. See Note 25Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information. Estrella del Mar I is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Kilroot and Ballylumford — In April 2019, the Company entered into an agreement forto sell its entire 100% interest in the sale of six of its combustion turbineKilroot coal and diesel-fired generation facilitiesoil-fired plant and related assets ("DPL peaker assets").energy storage facility and the Ballylumford gas-fired plant in the United Kingdom. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying value of the asset group of $346$232 million was greater than its fair value less costs to sell of $237$114 million. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $109$115 million. The DPL peaker assets areCompany completed the sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford in June 2019. See Note 25Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information. Prior to their sale, Kilroot and Ballylumford were reported in the USEurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
During the second quarter of 2016,Shady Point — In December 2018, the Company testedentered into an agreement to sell Shady Point, a coal-fired generation facility in the recoverability of its long-lived generation assets at DPL. Uncertainty created byU.S. Due first to the Supreme Court of Ohio’s June 20, 2016 opinion regarding ESP 2, lower expectations ofuncertainty around future revenue resulting fromcash flows, and then upon meeting the most recent PJM capacity auction and higher anticipated environmental compliance costs resulting from third party studies were collectively determined to be an impairment indicator for these assets. Theheld-for-sale criteria, the Company performed an impairment analysis of the Shady Point asset group in the second, third and determined thatfourth quarters of 2018, resulting in the carrying amountrecognition of Killen, a coal-fired generation facility, and certain DPL peaking generation facilities were not recoverable. The Killen and DPL peaking generationtotal asset groups wereimpairment expense of $157 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Using the market approach, the asset group was determined to have a fair value of $84$30 million as of December 31, 2018. The sale was completed in May 2019. See Note 25—Held-for-Sale and $5 million, respectively, usingDispositions for further information. Prior to the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized total asset impairment expense of $235 million. DPL issale, Shady Point was reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
NejapaDuring the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived coal-fired generation assets and one gas-fired peaking plant at DPL. Uncertainty around the useful life of Stuart and Killen related to the Company’s ESP proceedings and lower forward dark spreads and capacity prices were collectively determined to be an impairment indicator for these assets. Market information indicating a significant decrease in the fair value of Zimmer and Miami Fort was determined to be an indicator of impairment for these assets. The lower forward dark spreads and capacity prices, along with the indicators at the other coal-fired facilities, collectively, resulted in an indicator of impairment for the Conesville asset group. For the gas-fired peaking plant, significant incremental capital expenditures relative to its fair value, and an impairment charge taken at this facility in the second quarter of 2016, were collectively determined to be impairment indicators for this asset. The Company performed an impairment analysis for each of these asset groups and determined that their carrying amounts were not

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

recoverable. The Stuart, Killen, Miami Fort, Zimmer, Conesville and the gas-fired peaking plant asset groups were determined to have fair values of $57 million, $43 million, $36 million, $24 million, $1 million and $2 million, respectively, using the market approach for Miami Fort and Zimmer and the income approach for the remaining asset groups. As a result, the Company recognized total asset impairment expense of $624 million. DPL is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.
Buffalo Gap I — During 2016,2018, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Buffalo Gap I. Low windNejapa, a landfill gas plant in El Salvador. Decreased production during 2016 resulted in management lowering future expectationsas a result of production and therefore future forecasted revenues. As such thisthe landfill owner's failure to perform improvements necessary to continue extracting gas from the landfill was determined to beidentified as an impairment indicator. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset group was not recoverable. The Buffalo Gap I asset group, consisting of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets, was determined to have a fair value of $36$5 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $77$37 million ($23 million attributable to AES). Buffalo Gap Ias of December 31, 2018. Nejapa is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Buffalo Gap II — During 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Buffalo Gap II. Impairment indicators were identified based on a decline in forward power curves. The Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The Buffalo Gap II asset group was determined to have a fair value of $92 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $159 million ($49 million attributable to AES). Buffalo Gap II is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.

Buffalo Gap III — During 2015, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Buffalo Gap III, a wind farm in Texas. Impairment indicators were identified based on a decline in forward power curves coupled with the near term expiration of favorable contracted cash flows. The Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The Buffalo Gap III asset group was determined to have a fair value of $118 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $116 million. Buffalo Gap III is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.

174 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
U.K. Wind — During 2015, the Company decided to no longer pursue two wind projects in the U.K. based on regulatory clarifications specific to these projects, resulting in a full impairment. Impairment indicators were also identified at four other wind projects based on their current development status and a reassessment of the likelihood that each project would be pursued given aviation concerns, regulatory changes, economic considerations and other factors. The Company determined that the carrying amounts of each of these asset groups, which totaled $38 million, were not recoverable. In aggregate, the asset groups were determined to have a fair value of $1 million using the market approach and, as a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $37 million. The U.K. Wind Projects are reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositions for further information.
20.23. INCOME TAXES
U.S. Tax Reform — On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Act”). The 2017 Act significantly changes U.S. corporate income tax law. Among other changes effective in 2017, the 2017 Act requires companies to pay a one-time tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
The Company recognized the income tax effects of the 2017 Act in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) which provides SEC guidance on the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes, in the reporting period in which the 2017 Act was signed into law. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements reflect provisional amounts for those impacts for which the accounting under ASC 740 is incomplete, but a reasonable estimate could be determined.
The Company has calculated its best estimate of the impact of the 2017 Act in its income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 in accordance with its understanding of the 2017 Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing, and as a result recognized $714 million of tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2017.
This total includes a provisional tax expense of $39 million related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% to 21%. The most material deferred taxes to be remeasured related to net operating losses (after reduction for the one-time transition tax) and property, plant and equipment. Additional time is required to finalize remeasurement effects. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities related to regulated utilities was recorded as a regulatory liability.
The fourth quarter impact also includes provisional tax expense of $675 million related to the one-time

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

transition tax on the deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. The calculation of the one-time tax is quite complex, requiring determinations of liquid asset balances over three years, determination of foreign earnings and profits (“E&P," a U.S. tax measure) at multiple dates, and multiple other computations. Our estimated tax expense was impacted by cash and restricted cash balances at foreign subsidiaries, unbilled receivables, and other liquid assets taxable at a 15.5% rate and the balance of non-cash E&P taxable at 8%. We anticipate further guidance on the determination of fair value for federal tax purposes of the shares we hold in our publicly traded subsidiaries, which are considered components of our foreign subsidiaries' "cash position" and taxed at the 15.5% rate, and may materially impact our provisional estimate. The one-time transition tax had a significant impact on our 2017 effective tax rate and utilized approximately $1.9 billion or 51% of our U.S. net operating losses. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions the Company may take as a result of the 2017 Act. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.
Argentine Tax Reform — In December 2017, the Argentine government enacted reforms to its income tax laws that resulted in a decrease to statutory income tax rates for our Argentine businesses from 35% to 30% in 2018-2019 and to 25% for 2020 and future years. The impact of remeasuring deferred taxes to account for the enacted change in future applicable income tax rates was recognized as income tax benefit in the fourth quarter of 2017, resulting in a decrease of $21 million to consolidated income tax expense.
Chilean Tax Reform — In February 2016, the Chilean government enacted further reforms to its income tax laws that resulted in an increase to statutory income tax rates for most of our Chilean businesses from 25% to 25.5% in 2017 and to 27% for 2018 and future years. The impact of remeasuring deferred taxes to account for the enacted change in future applicable income tax rates was recognized as a discrete income tax expense in the first quarter of 2016, resulting in an increase of $26 million to consolidated income tax expense.
Income Tax Provision — The following table summarizes the expense for income taxes on continuing operations for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,202020192018
Federal:Current$(8)$(7)$
Deferred(17)(4)186 
State:Current(1)
Deferred
Foreign:Current458 368 378 
Deferred(219)(4)130 
Total$216 $352 $708 
December 31, 2017 2016 2015
Federal:Current$
 $2
 $9
 Deferred545
 (361) (63)
State:Current
 1
 1
 Deferred1
 (4) (5)
Foreign:Current335
 318
 470
 Deferred109
 76
 
Total $990
 $32
 $412
Effective and Statutory Rate Reconciliation — The following table summarizes a reconciliation of the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate as a percentage of income from continuing operations before taxes for the periods indicated:
December 31,202020192018
Statutory Federal tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit(6)%%%
Taxes on foreign earnings15 %12 %%
Valuation allowance16 %(2)%(2)%
Change in tax law%(1)%%
US Investment Tax Credit(8)%%%
Other—net%(1)%(1)%
Effective tax rate44 %35 %35 %
December 31, 2017 2016 2015
Statutory Federal tax rate 35 % 35 % 35 %
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit (7)% (18)% (6)%
Taxes on foreign earnings  % (46)% 5 %
Valuation allowance 10 % 10 % (5)%
Uncertain tax positions  % 4 % (1)%
Noncontrolling Interest on Buffalo Gap impairments  % 31 % 3 %
Change in tax law 90 % 12 %  %
Goodwill impairment  %  % 11 %
Other—net  % (11)%  %
Effective tax rate 128 % 17 % 42 %
For 2020, the 15% taxes on foreign earnings item includes $20 million of tax benefit associated with the Company's equity investment in Guacolda. Included in the 2020 (8)% U.S. investment tax credit is $35 million of benefit associated with the Na Pua Makani wind facility. Not included in the 2020 effective tax rate is $75 million of income tax expense recorded to additional paid-in-capital related to the Company's sale of 35% of its ownership interest in the Southland Energy assets. See Note 17—Equity for details of the sale.
For 2017,2019, the 90%12% taxes on foreign earnings item includes $19 million of tax benefit associated with the Company's equity investment in Guacolda. Included in the 2019 change in tax law amount of (1)% are the downward adjustments to the U.S. one-time transition tax expense and deferred tax remeasurement benefit resulting from the issuance of the final regulations in 2019, offset by the impact of deferred tax remeasurement expense related to the December 2019 Argentina tax law change.
For 2018, the 6% change in tax law item relates primarily to the impact of U.S. and Argentina tax reform enactedchanges in the current period. The impactestimate under SAB 118 of the U.Simpacts of adoption of the TCJA. The Company recognized tax expense of $194 million related to revised estimates of the one-time transition tax and remeasurementin accordance with proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury in 2018. The adjustment was due in large part to the approach the proposed regulations adopted to determine the fair value of our interests in publicly traded subsidiaries. The Company also recognized tax benefit of $77 million related to revised estimates of deferred tax remeasurement. Included in the 9% taxes represents 88% and 5%, respectively, whichon foreign earnings item is partially offset by$124 million of U.S. GILTI tax expense related to foreign subsidiaries, including the tax benefit resulting from Argentina tax reform representing 3%.sale of our interest in Masinloc.
For 2016, the 31% Buffalo Gap impairments item relates to the amounts of impairment allocated to noncontrolling interest which is nondeductible.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Income Tax Receivables and Payables — The current income taxes receivable and payable are included in Other Current Assets and Accrued and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The noncurrent income taxes receivable and payable are included in Other Noncurrent Assets and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the income taxes receivable and payable as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,20202019
Income taxes receivable—current$138 $131 
Income taxes receivable—noncurrent10 
Total income taxes receivable$147 $141 
Income taxes payable—current$284 $172 
Income taxes payable—noncurrent
Total income taxes payable$284 $172 
December 31, 2017 2016
Income taxes receivable—current $147
 $136
Total income taxes receivable $147
 $136
Income taxes payable—current $129
 $149
Income taxes payable—noncurrent 17
 22
Total income taxes payable $146
 $171
Deferred Income Taxes — Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for


175 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

income tax purposes and (b) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. These items are stated at the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards for tax return purposes of approximately $1.9$2.1 billion, expiringof which approximately $950 million expire in years 20272033 to 2036.2036 and $1.2 billion carry forward indefinitely. The Company also had federal general business tax credit carryforwards of approximately $21$66 million, expiring primarily fromof which $16 million expire in years 2021 to 2037,2031 and federal alternative minimum tax credits of approximately $5$50 million that may be fully recovered by 2021 underexpire in years 2032 to 2040. Additionally, the 2017 Act. The Company had state net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20172020 of approximately $9.3$7.3 billion expiring primarily in years 20182021 to 2037.2040. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2.8$2.0 billion that expire at various times beginning in 20182021 and some of which carry forward without expiration, and tax credits available in foreign jurisdictions of approximately $28$14 million, $18$13 million of which expire in 2021, $1 million of which expire in years 2023 to 2028, and $9 million of which carry forward without expiration.2021.
Valuation allowances increased $112decreased $190 million during 20172020 to $988$634 million at December 31, 2017.2020. This net increasedecrease was primarily the result of valuation allowance activity due to the liquidation of certain holding companies with net operating losses with full valuation allowances.
Valuation allowances decreased $44 million during 2019 to $824 million at December 31, 2019. This net decrease was primarily the result of valuation allowance activity at certain of our Brazil subsidiaries.
Valuation allowances decreased $18 million during 2016 to $876 million at December 31, 2016. This net decrease was primarily the result of valuation allowance releasessubsidiaries and foreign exchange gains at certain of our Brazil subsidiaries.U.S. states.
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets as shown below will be realized when future taxable income is generated through the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and income that is expected to be generated by businesses that have long-term contracts or a history of generating taxable income.
The following table summarizes deferred tax assets and liabilities, as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2017 2016December 31,20202019
Differences between book and tax basis of property $(1,424) $(1,926)Differences between book and tax basis of property$(1,308)$(1,426)
Investment in U.S. tax partnershipsInvestment in U.S. tax partnerships(332)(44)
Other taxable temporary differences (143) (335)Other taxable temporary differences(403)(287)
Total deferred tax liability (1,567) (2,261)Total deferred tax liability(2,043)(1,757)
Operating loss carryforwards 1,439
 2,088
Operating loss carryforwards1,156 1,060 
Capital loss carryforwards 63
 59
Capital loss carryforwards73 57 
Bad debt and other book provisions 66
 96
Bad debt and other book provisions87 74 
Tax credit carryforwards 51
 54
Tax credit carryforwards78 33 
Other deductible temporary differences 60
 263
Other deductible temporary differences471 300 
Total gross deferred tax asset 1,679
 2,560
Total gross deferred tax asset1,865 1,524 
Less: valuation allowance (988) (876)
Less: Valuation allowanceLess: Valuation allowance(634)(824)
Total net deferred tax asset 691
 1,684
Total net deferred tax asset1,231 700 
Net deferred tax (liability) $(876) $(577)
Net deferred tax liabilityNet deferred tax liability$(812)$(1,057)
The Company considers undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. Except for the one-time transition tax in the U.S., no0 taxes have been recorded with respect to our indefinitely reinvested earnings in accordance with the relevant accounting guidance for income taxes. Should the earnings be remitted as dividends, the Company may be subject to additional foreign withholding and state income taxes. Under the 2017 Act, generallyTCJA, future distributions from foreign subsidiaries will generally be subject to a federal dividends received deduction in the U.S. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the cumulative amount of U.S. GAAP foreign

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

un-remitted earnings upon which additional income taxes have not been provided is approximately $4 billion. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of any additional taxes which may be payable on the undistributed earnings.
Income from operations in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment. The Company's income tax benefits related to the tax status of these operations are estimated to be $33 million, $26 million $20 million and $21$35 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The per share effect of these benefits after noncontrolling interests was $0.03, $0.02 and $0.02$0.04 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Included in the Company's income tax benefits is the benefit related to our operations in Vietnam, which is estimated to be $16 million, $13 million $15 million and $8$19 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The per share effect of these benefits related to our operations in Vietnam after noncontrolling interest was $0.01, $0.01 and $0.01 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


176 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The following table shows the income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes, net equity in earnings of affiliates and noncontrolling interests, for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,202020192018
U.S.$(135)$(57)$(218)
Non-U.S.623 1,058 2,236 
Total$488 $1,001 $2,018 
December 31, 2017 2016 2015
U.S. $(511) $(1,305) $(612)
Non-U.S. 1,282
 1,492
 1,601
Total $771
 $187
 $989
Uncertain Tax Positions — Uncertain tax positions have been classified as noncurrent income tax liabilities unless they are expected to be paid inwithin one year. The Company's policy for interest and penalties related to income tax exposures is to recognize interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table shows the total amount of gross accrued income taxes related to interest and penalties included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2017 2016December 31,20202019
Interest related $7
 $6
Interest related$$
Penalties related 
 
Penalties related
The following table shows the expense/(benefit) related to interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2017 2016 2015December 31,202020192018
Total expense (benefit) for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits $1
 $2
 $(2)
Total benefit for interest related to unrecognized tax benefitsTotal benefit for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits$$(2)$(3)
Total expense for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits 
 
 
Total expense for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
We are potentially subject to income tax audits in numerous jurisdictions in the U.S. and internationally until the applicable statute of limitations expires. Tax audits by their nature are often complex and can require several years to complete. The following is a summary of tax years potentially subject to examination in the significant tax and business jurisdictions in which we operate:
JurisdictionTax Years Subject to Examination
Argentina2011-20172014-2020
Brazil2012-20172015-2020
Chile2014-20172017-2020
Colombia2015-20172016-2020
Dominican Republic2015-20172015-2020
El Salvador2014-20172017-2020
Netherlands2014-20172014-2020
PhilippinesPanama2013-20172017-2020
United Kingdom2012-20172017-2020
United States (Federal)2014-20172017-2020
As of December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $348$458 million, $352$465 million and $364$463 million, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would benefit the effective tax rate as of December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 is $332$439 million, $332$448 million and $343$446 million, respectively, of which $29$33 million $24 million and $24 million, respectively,for each year would be in the form of tax attributes that would warrant a full valuation allowance.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Further, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that would benefit the effective tax rate as of 2020 would be reduced by approximately $161 million of tax expense related to remeasurement from 35% to 21%.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits anticipated to result in a net decrease to unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of December 31, 20172020 is estimated to be between $5$0 million and $15$10 million, primarily relating to statute of limitation lapses and tax exam settlements.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated (in millions):
202020192018
Balance at January 1$465 $463 $348 
Additions for current year tax positions
Additions for tax positions of prior years146 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(6)(5)(26)
Lapse of statute of limitations(4)(3)(7)
Balance at December 31$458 $465 $463 


December 31, 2017 2016 2015
Balance at January 1 $352
 $364
 $384
Additions for current year tax positions 
 2
 2
Additions for tax positions of prior years 2
 1
 12
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (5) (1) (7)
Effects of foreign currency translation 
 
 (3)
Settlements 
 (13) (17)
Lapse of statute of limitations (1) (1) (7)
Balance at December 31 $348
 $352
 $364
177 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits. However, audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty. It is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material, but cannot be estimated as of December 31, 2017.2020. Our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted.
21.24. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Eletropaulo — Due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016, management decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in Brazil, Sul and Eletropaulo, to reduce the Company's exposure to the Brazilian distribution market.
Eletropaulo — In November 2017, Eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitioned the listing of those shares into the Novo Mercado, which is a listing segment of the Brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance. Upon conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares, AES no longer controlled Eletropaulo, but maintained significant influence over the business. As a result, the Company deconsolidated Eletropaulo. After deconsolidation, the Company's 17% ownership interest is reflected as an equity method investment. The Company recorded an after-tax loss on deconsolidation of $611 million, which primarily consisted of $455 million related to cumulative translation losses and $243 million related to pension losses reclassified from AOCL.
In December 2017, all the remaining criteria were met for Eletropaulo to qualify as a discontinued operation. Therefore, its results of operations and financial position were reported as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Eletropaulo's
In June 2018, the Company completed the sale of its entire 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo through a bidding process hosted by the Brazilian securities regulator, CVM. Gross proceeds of $340 million were received at our subsidiary in Brazil, subject to the payment of taxes. Upon disposal of Eletropaulo, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss attributable to AES, including the lossgain on deconsolidation, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $633sale of $243 million and $192 million, respectively. Eletropaulo's pre-tax income attributable to AES for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $73 million.(after-tax $199 million). Prior to its classification as discontinued operations, Eletropaulo was reported in the BrazilSouth America SBU reportable segment.
SulBorsod The Company executed an agreement In 2011, Borsod, which held two coal and biomass-fired generation plants in Hungary, filed for the sale of Sul, a wholly-owned subsidiary,liquidation and was deconsolidated with its historical operating results reflected in June 2016. The results of operations and financial position of Sul are reported as discontinued operations inunder prior accounting guidance.
In October 2018, the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria,liquidation was completed and the Company recognized an after-tax lossa deferred gain of $382$26 million, primarily comprised of a pre-tax impairment charge of $783$20 million offset by a tax benefit of $266 million related to the impairment of the Sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in Sul. Prior to the impairment charge, the carrying value of the Sul asset group of $1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell. However, the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the Sul disposal group.
On October 31, 2016, the Company completed the sale of Sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $484 million, excluding contingent consideration. Upon disposal of Sul, the Company incurred an additional after-tax

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

loss on sale of $737 million. The cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $1.1 billion. This includes the reclassification of approximately $1 billionwrite-off of cumulative translation losses resulting in a net reduction to the Company’s stockholders’ equity of $92 million.
Sul’s pre-tax loss attributable to AES for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1.4 billion and $32 million, respectively.balances. Prior to its classification as discontinued operations, SulBorsod was reported in the BrazilEurasia SBU reportable segment.
The following table summarizesExcluding the carrying amountsgain on sale of Eletropaulo and the major classesdeferred gain on liquidation of assetsBorsod, income from discontinued operations and liabilitiescash flows from operating and investing activities of discontinued operations atwere immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:2018.
(in millions)December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses:   
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $61
Short-term investments
 268
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 and $94, respectively
 745
Other current assets
 499
Property, plant and equipment and intangibles, net
 2,504
Investments in and advances to affiliates (1)
86
 
Deferred income taxes
 554
Other classes of assets that are not major
 305
Total assets of discontinued operations$86
 $4,936
Other assets of businesses classified as held-for-sale (2)
1,948
 
Total assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses (3)
$2,034
 $4,936
Liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses:   
Accounts payable$
 $418
Accrued and other liabilities
 954
Non-recourse debt
 1,009
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
 1,159
Other noncurrent liabilities
 678
Other classes of liabilities that are not major
 31
Total liabilities of discontinued operations$
 $4,249
Other liabilities of businesses classified as held-for-sale (2)
1,033
 
Total liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses (3)
$1,033
 $4,249
_____________________________
(1)
Represents the Company's 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo.
(2)
Masinloc, Eletrica Santiago, and the DPL peaker assets were classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2017. See Note 22—Held-for-Sale Businesses and Dispositionsfor further information.
(3)
Amounts at December 31, 2016 are classified as both current and long-term on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The following table summarizes the major line items constituting losses from discontinued operations for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,2017 2016 2015
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax:     
Revenue  regulated
$3,320
 $4,036
 $4,430
Cost of sales(3,151) (3,954) (4,227)
Other income and expense items that are not major (1)
(166) (160) (70)
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses3
 (78) 133
Loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses(611) (1,385) 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations(608) (1,463) 133
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(25) (142) (92)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation(633) (1,605) 41
Income tax benefit (expense)(21) 495
 (53)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax$(654) $(1,110) $(12)
_____________________________
(1)
Includes a loss contingency recognized by our equity method investment in discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes the operating and investing cash flows from discontinued operations for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,2017 2016 2015
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations$164
 $529
 $(125)
Cash flows used in investing activities of discontinued operations(288) (368) (65)

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

22.25. HELD-FOR-SALE BUSINESSES AND DISPOSITIONS
Held-for-Sale Businesses
MasinlocMong Duong In December 2017,2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its entire 51% ownership interest in Mong Duong, a coal-fired plant in Vietnam, and 51% equity interest in MasinlocMong Duong Finance Holdings B.V, an SPV accounted for approximately $1 billion,as an equity affiliate. The sale is subject to customary purchase price adjustments. Masinloc consists of a coal-fired generation plant in operation, a coal-fired generation plant currently under construction,regulatory approval and an energy storage facility all located in the Philippines. Closing of the sale is expected during the first half of 2018, subject to certain regulatory approvals.close in early 2022. As of December 31, 2017, Masinloc2020, the Mong Duong plant and SPV were classified as held-for-sale, but did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. On a consolidated basis, the carrying value of the plant and SPV held-for-sale as of December 31, 2020 was $472 million. Mong Duong is reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Estrella del Mar I — The Estrella del Mar I power barge met the held-for-sale criteria as of December 31, 2020, but did not meet criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. On a consolidated basis, the carrying value of the power barge held-for-sale as of December 31, 2020 was $16 million. Estrella del Mar I is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Itabo — In June 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its 43% ownership interest in Itabo, a coal-fired plant and gas turbine in Dominican Republic, for $101 million. In the fourth quarter of 2020, the expected sales price was reduced to $92 million, reflecting dividends distributed by Itabo. In February 2021, the sale was approved by the Superintendence of Electricity and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, Itabo was classified as held-for-sale, but did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. On a consolidated basis, the net carrying value of Masinloc atthe Itabo facility held-for-sale as of December 31, 20172020 was $475$189 million. MasinlocItabo is reported in the EurasiaMCAC SBU reportable segment.


178 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Jordan — In 2014,February 2019, the Company completed the sale of 45% of its ownership interest in Masinloc for $436 million, including $23 million of consideration that was contingent upon the achievement of certain tax restructuring efficiencies. The transaction was accounted for as a sale of in-substance real estate. In December 2017, the related contingency expired and the $23 million of contingent consideration was recognized as a gain in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Electrica Santiago — In December 2017, AES Gener entered into an agreement to sell Electrica Santiago, comprised of four gas and diesel-firedits 36% ownership interest in two generation plants, IPP1 and IPP4, and a solar plant in Chile,Jordan. In December 2019, the original sales agreement expired, and in April 2020, one of the potential buyers withdrew from the transaction due to the uncertain economic conditions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. As of June 30, 2020, the solar plant no longer met the held-for-sale criteria, while the Company continued with an active process to complete the sale of its controlling interest in IPP1 and IPP4 and believed the sale remained probable. As such, the solar plant was reclassified as held and used as of June 30, 2020.
In November 2020, the Company signed an agreement to sell 26% ownership interest in IPP1 and IPP4 for $300 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments.$58 million. The sale is expected to close during the first half of 2018, subject to conditions precedent in the agreement.second quarter of 2021. After completion of the sale, the Company will retain a 10% ownership interest in IPP1 and IPP4, which will be accounted for as an equity method investment. As of December 31, 2017, Electrica Santiago was classified as held-for-sale, but did not meet2020, the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Electrica Santiago's carrying value at December 31, 2017 was $186 million. Electrica Santiago is reported in the Andes SBU reportable segment.
DPL Peaker Assets — In December 2017, DPL entered into an agreement to sell six of its combustion turbine and diesel-fired generation facilities and related assets ("DPL peaker assets") for $241 million, subject to purchase price adjustments. The sale is subject to regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the first half of 2018. As of December 31, 2017, the DPL peaker assetsplants were classified as held-for-sale, but did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. After impairment,On a consolidated basis, the net carrying value of the DPL peaker assets atplants held-for-sale as of December 31, 20172020 was $237$154 million. The DPL peaker assets areJordan is reported in the USEurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
Excluding any impairment charges, or gain/loss on sale, pre-tax income attributable to AES of businesses held-for-sale as of December 31, 20172020 was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Masinloc$103
 $103
 $99
Electrica Santiago9
 11
 10
DPL Peaker Assets17
 20
 24
Total$129
 $134
 $133
Year Ended December 31,202020192018
Mong Duong$55 $34 $48 
Estrella del Mar I12 17 
Itabo41 30 33 
Jordan20 18 11 
Total$121 $94 $109 
Dispositions
Zimmer and Miami FortUruguaianaIn December 2017, DPL and AES Ohio GenerationSeptember 2020, the Company completed the sale of Zimmer and Miami Fort, two coal-fired generating plants, for net proceeds of $70 million,its entire interest in AES Uruguaiana, resulting in a gainpre-tax loss on sale of $13$90 million, primarily due to the write-off of cumulative translation adjustments. As part of the sale agreement, the Company has guaranteed payment of certain contingent liabilities and provided indemnifications to the buyer which were estimated to have a fair value of $22 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to theirits sale, Zimmer and Miami Fort wereUruguaiana was reported in the USSouth America SBU reportable segment.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Kazakhstan HydroelectricAffiliates of the Company (the “Affiliates”) previously operated Shulbinsk HPP and Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP (the “HPPs”), two hydroelectric plants in Kazakhstan, under a concession agreement with the Republic of Kazakhstan (“RoK”ROK”). In April 2017, the RoKROK initiated the process to transfer these plants back to the RoK.ROK. The RoKROK indicated that arbitration would be necessary to determine the correct Return Share Transfer Payment ("RST") and, rather than paying the Affiliates, deposited the RST into an escrow account. In exchange, the Affiliates transferred 100% of the shares in the HPPs to the RoK,ROK, under protest and with a full reservation of rights. The Company recorded a loss on disposal of $33 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. In February 2018, the Affiliates initiated the arbitration process in international court to recover at least $75 million of the RST placed in escrow, based on the September 30, 2017 RST calculation. Additional losses may be incurred if some or all
In May 2020, the arbitrator issued a final decision in favor of the disputed consideration is not paid byAffiliates, awarding the RoK viaAffiliates a mutually acceptable settlement, or upon any unfavorable decision rendered bynet amount of damages of approximately $45 million, which has been collected. AES recorded the arbiter. The transfer did not meetremaining $30 million as a loss on sale during the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations.quarter ended June 30, 2020. Prior to their transfer, the Kazakhstan HPPs were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
Kazakhstan CHPsRedondo Beach Land In April 2017,March 2020, the Company completed the sale of Ust-Kamenogorsk CHPland held by AES Redondo Beach, a gas-fired generating facility in California. The land’s carrying value was $24 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $41 million, reported in Other income on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. AES Redondo Beach will lease back the land from the purchaser for the remainder of the generation facility’s useful life. Redondo Beach is reported in the US and Sogrinsk CHP,Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Stuart and Killen — In December 2019, DPL completed the transfer of the co-owned Stuart coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units and the Killen coal-fired generating unit and combustion turbine retired in May 2018, including the associated environmental liabilities. The transfer resulted in cash expenditures of $51 million and a gain on disposal of $20 million. Prior to their transfer, Stuart and Killen were reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 22Asset Impairment Expensefor further information.


179 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

Kilroot and Ballylumford — In June 2019, the Company completed the sale of its combined heatingentire interest in the Kilroot coal and power coal plantsoil-fired plant and energy storage facility and the Ballylumford gas-fired plant in Kazakhstan,the United Kingdom for net proceeds of $24 million. The Company recognized$118 million, resulting in a pre-tax loss on sale of $49$33 million primarily relateddue to the write-off of cumulative translation losses.adjustments and accumulated other comprehensive income balances. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to the sale, Kilroot and Ballylumford were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 22Asset Impairment Expensefor further information.
Shady Point — In May 2019, the Company completed the sale of Shady Point, a U.S. coal-fired generating facility, for $29 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, Shady Point was reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 22Asset Impairment Expensefor further information.
CTNG — In December 2018, AES Gener completed the sale of CTNG, an entity that holds transmission lines in Chile, for $225 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $126 million after post-closing adjustments. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, CTNG was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Electrica Santiago — In May 2018, AES Gener completed the sale of Electrica Santiago for total consideration of $287 million, resulting in a final pre-tax gain on sale of $70 million after post-closing adjustments. Electrica Santiago consisted of four gas and diesel-fired generation plants in Chile. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, Electrica Santiago was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Masinloc — In March 2018, the Company completed the sale of its entire 51% equity interest in Masinloc for cash proceeds of $1.05 billion, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $772 million after post-closing adjustments, subject to U.S. income tax. Masinloc consisted of a coal-fired generation plant in operation, a coal-fired generation plant under construction and an energy storage facility all located in the Philippines. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, Masinloc was reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
DPL peaker assets — In March 2018, DPL completed the sale of six of its combustion turbine and diesel-fired generation facilities and related assets ("DPL peaker assets") for total proceeds of $239 million, resulting in a loss on sale of $2 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to their sale, the Kazakhstan CHP plantsDPL peaker assets were reported in the EurasiaUS and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
U.K. WindBeckjord facility DuringIn February 2018, DPL transferred its interest in Beckjord, a coal-fired generation facility retired in 2014, including its obligations to remediate the second quarterfacility and its site. The transfer resulted in cash expenditures of 2016, the Company deconsolidated UK Wind$15 million, inclusive of disposal charges, and recorded a loss on deconsolidationdisposal of $20 million to Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of businesses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.$12 million. Prior to deconsolidation, UK Windthe transfer, Beckjord was reported in the EurasiaUS and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 14—Equity and Note 19—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
DPLERAdvancion Energy Storage In January 2016,2018, the Company completeddeconsolidated the sale of DPLER, a competitive retail marketer selling electricityAES Advancion energy storage development business and contributed it to customersthe Fluence joint venture, resulting in Ohio, and recognized a gain on sale of $49$23 million. Proceeds of $76 million were receivedSee Note 8Investments in December 2015. DPLER did not meetand Advances to Affiliatesfor further discussion. Prior to the criteria to betransfer, the AES Advancion energy storage development business was reported as a discontinued operation. DPLER's results were therefore reflected within continuing operations in the Consolidated Statementspart of Operations. Prior to its sale, DPLER was reported in the US SBU reportable segment.
KelanitissaIn January 2016, the Company completed the sale of its interest in Kelanitissa, a diesel-fired generation plant in Sri Lanka, for $18 million, resulting in a loss on sale of $5 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Kelanitissa's results were therefore reflected within continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to its sale, Kelanitissa was reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Armenia Mountain — Under the terms of the sale agreement for certain U.S. Wind Projects, the buyer was provided an option to purchase the Company's 100% interest in Armenia Mountain, a wind project in Pennsylvania, for $75 million. The buyer exercised this optionCorporate and AES completed the sale of Armenia Mountain in July 2015. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Upon completion, net proceeds of $64 million were received and a pre-tax gain on sale of $22 million was recognized. Prior to its sale, Armenia Mountain was reported in the US SBU reportable segment.Other.
Excluding any impairment charge or gain/loss on sale, pre-tax income (loss) attributable to AES of disposed businesses was as followsimmaterial for the year ended December 31, 2020. The following table summarizes, excluding any impairment charge or gain/loss on sale, the pre-tax income (loss) attributable to AES of disposed businesses for the periods indicated (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,20192018
Kilroot and Ballylumford$(1)$35 
Stuart and Killen (1)
52 77 
Shady Point(5)19 
Masinloc
Other(2)14 
Total$44 $154 
_____________________________
(1)After the retirement of Stuart and Killen in 2018, the Company entered into contracts to buy back all open capacity years for the plants at prices lower than the PJM capacity revenue prices. As such, the Company continued to earn capacity margin until the plants were transferred in December 2019. Reductions in the asset retirement obligations for ash ponds and landfills at Stuart and Killen in 2018 resulted in a $32 million reduction to cost of sales. See Note 4—Asset Retirement Obligations for further information.

Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Zimmer and Miami Fort$26
 $(14) $6
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric33
 34
 52
Kazakhstan CHPs13
 12
 16
DPLER
 
 11
Armenia Mountain
 
 6
Total$72
 $32
 $91

180 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

23.26. ACQUISITIONS
Alto Sertão IIVentus Wind Complex On August 3, 2017, the Company In December 2020, AES Brasil completed the acquisition of 100% of the Alto Sertão IIVentus Wind Complex (“Alto Sertão II”("Ventus") from Renova Energia S.A. for $181$91 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments, plus the assumption of $348including $4 million of non-recourse debt, and up to $30 million of contingent

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

consideration.expected working capital adjustments. At closing, the Company made an initial cash payment of $44 million. The remainder was recorded as a note payable, which will be substantially satisfied via a second installment payment expected to occur in the second quarter of 2021. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition; therefore, the total amount of consideration, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the individual assets and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. Ventus is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Penonome IIn May 2020, AES Panama completed the acquisition of the Penonome I wind farm from Goldwind International for $80 million. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the consideration transferred, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the individual assets and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. Penonome I is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Los Cururos — In November 2019, AES Gener completed the acquisition of the Los Cururos wind farm and transmission lines in Chile from EPM Chile S.A. for total consideration of $143 million, which excludes holdbacks related to indemnifications and purchase price adjustments. As of December 31, 2017, the purchase price allocation for Alto Sertão II is preliminary. The Company isincluding $5 million in working capital adjustments paid in the processfirst quarter of assessing2020. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the consideration transferred, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Los Cururos is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Distributed Energy — In December 2018, Distributed Energy acquired the outstanding noncontrolling interest in a partnership holding various solar projects from its tax equity partner for $23 million of consideration in a non-cash transaction through the assumption of debt, increasing the Company's ownership to 100%. The partnership was previously classified as an equity method investment. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the Company remeasured the equity investment at fair value and recognized a loss of $5 million in Other expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of the investment, along with the consideration transferred, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Distributed Energy is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Oahu In November 2018, AES Oahu amended a 2017 agreement to acquire 100% of Na Pua Makani Power Partners, a partnership designed to develop and hold a wind project in Hawaii. The fair value of the initial consideration was $53 million, of which $48 million was contingent on meeting predefined development milestones. The transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of a variable interest entity that did not meet the definition of a business, therefore the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values, which equaled the fair value of the consideration. As a result of the amendment, the Company paid $11 million in 2018 and the contingent consideration was reduced to $5 million, resulting in a $32 million gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration recorded in Other incomein the acquisition, and expects to complete the purchase price allocation within the one year measurement period. Alto Sertão IIConsolidated Statement of Operations. AES Oahu is a wind farm reported in the BrazilUS and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
BauruGuaimbê Solar Complex — On In September 25, 2017,2018, AES Tietê executed an investment agreement withBrasil completed the acquisition of the Guaimbê Solar Complex (“Guaimbê”) from Cobra do Brasil to provide approximately $140for $152 million, comprised of the exchange of $119 million of non-convertible debentures in project financing and additional cash consideration of $33 million. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the construction of photovoltaic solar plants in Brazil. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $45 million of non-convertible debentures have been executed and distributedconsideration transferred, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the project. Upon completion of the project, expectedindividual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Guaimbê is reported in the first half of 2018 and subject to the solar plants’ compliance with certain technical specifications defined in the agreement, Tietê expects to acquire the solar complex in exchange for the non-convertible debentures and an additional investment of approximately $55 million.South America SBU reportable segment.
Distributed Energy — On February 18, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the common stock of Main Street Power Company, Inc. for approximately $25 million. The purchase consideration was composed of $20 million cash. After the date of acquisition, Main Street Power Company, Inc. was renamed Distributed Energy, Inc.
In September 2016, Distributed Energy acquired the equity interest of various projects held by multiple partnerships for approximately $43 million. These partnerships were previously classified as equity method investments. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, the Company has recorded the opening balance sheets of the acquired businesses based on the purchase price allocation as of the acquisition date.
24.27. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and potential common stock outstanding during the period. Potential common stock, for purposes of determining diluted earnings per share, includes the effects of dilutive restrictedRSUs and stock units, stock options and convertible securities.options. The effect of such potential common stock is computed using the treasury stock method or the if-converted method, as applicable.method.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation for income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, 2018,


181 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

where income represents the numerator and weighted-average shares represent the denominator. Values are in millions except per share data:
Year Ended December 31,202020192018
(in millions, except per share data)IncomeShares$ per ShareIncomeShares$ per ShareIncomeShares$ per Share
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$43 665 $0.06 $302 664 $0.46 $985 662 $1.49 
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Stock options
Restricted stock units(0.01)(0.01)
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE$43 668 $0.06 $302 667 $0.45 $985 665 $1.48 
Year Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
 Loss Shares $ per Share Loss Shares $ per Share Income Shares $ per Share
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders (1)
$(507) 660
 $(0.77) $(25) 660
 $(0.04) $318
 687
 $0.46
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES    
            
Restricted stock units
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2
 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE$(507) 660
 $(0.77) $(25) 660
 $(0.04) $318
 689
 $0.46
_____________________________
(1)
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax, of $20 million less the $5 million adjustment to retained earnings to record the DP&L redeemable preferred stock at its redemption value as of December 31, 2016.
The calculation of diluted earnings per share excluded 72 million 8 million and 8 millionoutstanding stock awards outstanding for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, that2018, which would be anti-dilutive. These stock awards could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future. Additionally, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, all 15 million convertible debentures were omitted from the earnings per share calculation. The Company redeemed all of its existing TECONs in June 2017. The stock awards and convertible debentures were excluded from the calculation because they were anti-dilutive.
25.28. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
AES is a diversified power generation and utility company organized into five4 market-oriented SBUs. See additional discussion of the Company's principal markets in Note 15—18—SegmentSegments and Geographic Information. Within our five4 SBUs, we have two2 primary lines of business: Generationgeneration and Utilities.utilities. The Generationgeneration line of business

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

uses a wide range of fuels and technologies to generate electricity such as coal, gas, hydro, wind, solar, and biomass. Our Utilitiesutilities business comprises businesses that transmit, distribute, and in certain circumstances, generate power. In addition, the Company has operations in the renewables area. These efforts include projects primarily in wind, solar, and solar.energy storage.
Operating and Economic Risks — The Company operates in several developing economies where macroeconomic conditions are usuallytypically more volatile than developed economies. Deteriorating market conditions oftenand evolving industry expectations to transition away from fossil fuel sources for generation expose the Company to the risk of decreased earnings and cash flows due to, among other factors, adverse fluctuations in the commodities and foreign currency spot markets.markets, and potential changes in the estimated useful lives of our thermal plants. Additionally, credit markets around the globe continue to tighten their standards, which could impact our ability to finance growth projects through access to capital markets. Currently, the Company has an investment grade rating from both Standard & Poor's and Fitch of BBB-, and a below-investment grade rating from Standard & Poor'sMoody's of BB-. ThisBa1. A downgrade in our current investment grade ratings could affect the Company's ability to finance new and/or existing development projects at competitive interest rates. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had $949 million$1 billion of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents.
During 2017, 69%2020, 66% of our revenue was generated outside the U.S. and a significant portion of our international operations is conducted in developing countries. We continue to invest in several developing countries to expand our existing platform and operations. International operations, particularly the operation, financing, and development of projects in developing countries, entail significant risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation:
economic, social, and political instability in any particular country or region;
inability to economically hedge energy prices;
volatility in commodity prices;
adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
government restrictions on converting currencies or repatriating funds;
unexpected changes in foreign laws, regulatory framework, or in trade, monetary or fiscal policies;
high inflation and monetary fluctuations;
restrictions on imports of solar panels, wind turbines, coal, oil, gas, or other raw materials required by our generation businesses to operate;
threatened or consummated expropriation or nationalization of our assets by foreign governments;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, similar organizations, or other counterparties to honor their commitments;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, courts, or similar bodies to enforce contracts that are economically advantageous to subsidiaries of the Company and economically unfavorable to


182 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

counterparties, against such counterparties, whether such counterparties are governments or private parties;
inability to obtain access to fair and equitable political, regulatory, administrative, and legal systems;
adverse changes in government tax policy;
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions;
difficulties in enforcing our contractual rights, enforcing judgments, or obtaining a just result in local jurisdictions; and
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions.inability to obtain financing on expected terms.
Any of these factors, individually or in combination with others, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, our Latin American operations experience volatility in revenue and earnings which have caused and are expected to cause significant volatility in our results of operations and cash flows. The volatility is caused by regulatory and economic difficulties, political instability, indexation of certain PPAs to fuel prices, and currency fluctuations being experienced in many of these countries. This volatility reduces the predictability and enhances the uncertainty associated with cash flows from these businesses.
Our inability to predict, influence or respond appropriately to changes in law or regulatory schemes, including any inability to obtain reasonable increases in tariffs or tariff adjustments for increased expenses, could adversely impact our results of operations or our ability to meet publicly announced projections or analysts' expectations. Furthermore, changes in laws or regulations or changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory provisions in jurisdictions where we operate, particularly our Utilityutility businesses where electricity tariffs are subject to regulatory review or approval, could adversely affect our business, including, but not limited to:

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

changes in the determination, definition, or classification of costs to be included as reimbursable or pass-through costs;
changes in the definition or determination of controllable or noncontrollable costs;
adverse changes in tax law;
changes in the definition of events which may or may not qualify as changes in economic equilibrium;
changes in the timing of tariff increases;
other changes in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions; or
changes in environmental regulations, including regulations relating to GHG emissions in any of our businesses.
Any of the above events may result in lower margins for the affected businesses, which can adversely affect our results of operations.
Alto MaipoCOVID-19 Pandemic The Company's subsidiary, AES Gener, is currently constructing Alto Maipo, a hydroelectric facility near Santiago Chile. Increased project costs, or delaysCOVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted global economic activity, including electricity and energy consumption, and caused significant volatility in construction, at Alto Maipo could havefinancial markets. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an adverse impact on the Company. Alto Maipo has experienced construction difficulties, which have resulted in an increase in projected costs over the original $2 billion budget. These overages led to a series of negotiations with the intention of restructuring the project’s existing financial structuredemand for electricity and, obtaining additional funding. On March 17, 2017, AES Gener completed the legal and financial restructuring of Alto Maipo, and through the Company’s 67% ownership interest in AES Gener, AES now has an effective 62% indirect economic interest in Alto Maipo. See Note 14—Equityfor additional information regarding the restructuring.
Following the restructuring described above, the project continued to face construction difficulties, including greater than expected costs and slower than anticipated productivity by construction contractors toward agreed-upon milestones. Furthermore, during the second quarter of 2017, as a result, on the financial results and operations of the failure to performCompany. The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown at this time and may have material and adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in future periods.
Goodwill The Company considers a reporting unit at risk of impairment when its fair value does not exceed its carrying amount by onemore than 10%. In 2019, during the annual goodwill impairment test performed as of October 1, the Company determined that the fair value of its construction contractors, Constructora Nuevo Maipo S.A. (“CNM”)Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 3%. Therefore, Gener's $868 million goodwill balance was considered to be "at risk", Alto Maipo terminated CNM’s contract. largely due to the Chilean Government's announcement to phase out coal generation by 2040, and a decline in long-term energy prices.
As a result of the terminationlong-lived asset impairments at Gener during the third quarter of CNM, Alto Maipo’s construction debt2020, the Company determined there was a triggering event requiring a reassessment of $618 milliongoodwill impairment at September 1, 2020. The Company determined the fair value of its Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 13%. Although the fair value exceeds its carrying value by more than 10%, the Company continues to monitor the Gener reporting unit for potential interim goodwill impairment triggering events.


183 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

The Company monitors its reporting units at risk of impairment for interim impairment indicators, and derivative liabilities of $132 million are in technical defaultbelieves that the estimates and presented as currentassumptions used in the balance sheetcalculations are reasonable as of December 31, 2017.
Construction at2020. Should the project is continuing and the project is over 61% complete. In February 2018, Alto Maipo signed an amended EPC contract with Strabag, the permanent replacement contractor selected to complete CNM’s work, subject to approval by the project's senior lenders as partfair value of the second refinancing. Alto Maipo is working to resolve the challenges described above, however, there can be no assurance that Alto Maipo will succeed in these efforts and if there are further delays or cost overruns, or if Alto Maipo is unable to reach an agreement with the non-recourse lenders, there is a risk these lenders may seek to exercise remedies available as a result of the default noted above, or Alto Maipo may not be able to meet its contractual or other obligations and may be unable to continue with the project. If any of the above occur, there could be a material impairment for the Company.
The carrying value of the long-lived assets and deferred tax assets of Alto Maipo as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.4 billion and $60 million, respectively. Even though certain of the construction difficulties have not been formally resolved, construction costs continue to be capitalized as management believes the project is probable of completion. Management believes the carrying value of the long-lived asset group is recoverable and was not impaired as of December 31, 2017. In addition, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, they could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are decreased.
Puerto Rico — In September 2017, Puerto Rico was severely impacted by Hurricanes Irma and Maria, disrupting the operations of AES Puerto Rico and AES Ilumina. Puerto Rico’s infrastructure was severely damaged, including electric infrastructure and transmission lines. The extensive structural damage caused by hurricane winds and flooding is expected to take considerable time to repair. The Company sustained modest damage toCompany’s reporting units fall below its AES Ilumina solar plant, resulting in a $2 million loss, and minor damage to its AES Puerto Rico thermal plants.
Our subsidiaries in Puerto Rico have long-term PPAs with state-owned PREPA. As a result of the hurricanes, PREPA has declared an event of Force Majeure. However, both units of AES Puerto Rico and approximately 75% of AES Ilumina are available to generate electricity which, in accordance with the PPAs, will allow AES Puerto Rico to invoice capacity, even under Force Majeure.
Due to the extensive damage from the hurricanes, energy demand in Puerto Rico has decreased and is expected to remain low until economic activity has recovered. Despite the decrease in demand, AES Puerto Rico

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

was dispatched starting in February 2018. AES Puerto Rico continues to be the lowest cost and EPA compliant energy provider in Puerto Rico. Therefore, we expect AES Puerto Rico to continue to be a critical supplier to PREPA.
Starting prior to the hurricanes, PREPA has been facing economic challenges that could impact the Company, and on July 2, 2017, filed for bankruptcy under Title III. As a result of the bankruptcy filing, AES Puerto Rico and AES Ilumina’s non-recourse debt of $365 million and $36 million, respectively, is in default and has been classified as current as of December 31, 2017. In November 2017, AES Puerto Rico signed a Forbearance and Standstill Agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events. This agreement will expire on March 22, 2018.
The Company's receivable balances in Puerto Rico as of December 31, 2017 totaled $86 million, of which $53 million was overdue. After the filing of Title III protection, and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes, AES in Puerto Rico was collecting the overdue amounts from PREPA in line with historic payment patterns.
Considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount because of our assetsreduced operating performance, market declines, changes in Puerto Rico of $627 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required.discount rate, regulatory changes, or other adverse conditions, goodwill impairment charges may be necessary in future periods.
Foreign Currency Risks — AES operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Fluctuations in currency exchange rate between U.S. dollarthe USD and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows: the Argentine peso, the Brazilian real, the Chilean peso, the Colombian peso, the Dominican Republic peso, the Euro, the Chilean peso,Indian rupee, and the ColombianMexican peso.
Argentina — In September 2019, currency controls were established by the Argentine government in order to control the devaluation of the Argentine peso and keep Argentine central bank reserves at acceptable levels. Restrictions on the Philippine peso.flow of capital have limited the availability of international credit, and economic conditions in Argentina have further deteriorated, triggering additional devaluation of the Argentine peso and a deterioration of the country’s risk profile.
Concentrations — Due to the geographical diversity of its operations, the Company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply. Several of the Company's generation businesses rely on PPAs with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant businesses' output over the term of the PPAs. However, no0 single customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue in 2017, 20162020, 2019 or 2015.2018.
The cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under PPAs and fuel supply agreements. If a substantial portion of the Company's long-term PPAs and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated, the Company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms.
26.29. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain of our businesses in Panama and the Dominican Republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions. In the ordinary course of business, these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions, and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments. At two of our generation businesses in Mexico, the offtakers exercise significant influence, but not control, through representation on these businesses' Boards of Directors. These offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses. In Chile, we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Additionally, the Company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements.
The Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
Revenue—Non-Regulated$1,297
 $1,100
 $1,099
Cost of Sales—Non-Regulated220
 210
 330
Interest income8
 4
 25
Interest expense36
 39
 33

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

Years Ended December 31,202020192018
Revenue—Non-Regulated$1,506 $1,544 $1,533 
Cost of Sales—Non-Regulated504 531 342 
Interest income20 21 14 
Interest expense131 74 54 
The following table summarizes the balances receivable from and payable to related parties included in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,20202019
Receivables from related parties$252 $370 
Accounts and notes payable to related parties (1)
1,765 1,976 
December 31,2017 2016
Receivables from related parties$250
 $218
Accounts and notes payable to related parties727
 892
_____________________________
The Company entered into(1)Includes $1 billion of debt to Mong Duong Finance Holdings B.V., an SPV accounted for as an equity transaction withaffiliate as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (see Note 11—Debt). As of December 31, 2020, the debt balance at the SPV was reclassified to held-for-sale liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Also includes $181 million and $415 million of debt to Banco General S.A., a bank in Panama where our related party, Linda Group, see Note 14—Equity for further information.minority partner in Colon is part of its board of directors as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively; and $379 million and $287 million of debt to Strabag, our EPC contractor and minority partner in Alto Maipo as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

27.

184 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

30. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly Financial Data — The following tables summarize the unaudited quarterly Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Company for 20172020 and 20162019 (amounts in millions, except per share data). Amounts have been restated to reflect discontinued operations in all periods presented and reflect all adjustments necessary in the opinion of management for a fair statement of the results for interim periods.
Quarter Ended 2020Mar 31Jun 30Sep 30Dec 31
Revenue$2,338 $2,217 $2,545 $2,560 
Operating margin507 524 756 906 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (1)
229 (481)401 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
Net income (loss)$229 $$(481)$401 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$144 $(83)$(333)$318 
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.22 $(0.13)$(0.50)$0.48 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.22 $(0.12)$(0.50)$0.48 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.22 $(0.13)$(0.50)$0.47 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.22 $(0.12)$(0.50)$0.47 
Dividends declared per common share$0.14 $$0.14 $0.29 
Quarter Ended 2017Mar 31 June 30 Sept 30 Dec 31
Revenue$2,581
 $2,613
 $2,693
 $2,643
Operating margin554
 625
 642
 643
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (1)
97
 141
 236
 (622)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax1
 9
 25
 (664)
Net income (loss)$98
 $150
 $261
 $(1,286)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(24) $53
 $152
 $(1,342)
Basic income (loss) per share:       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.04
 $0.08
 $0.22
 $(1.03)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
 
 0.01
 (1.00)
Basic income (loss) per share attributable to The AES Corporation$0.04
 $0.08
 $0.23
 $(2.03)
Diluted income (loss) per share:       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.04
 $0.08
 $0.22
 $(1.03)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
 
 0.01
 (1.00)
Diluted income (loss) per share attributable to The AES Corporation$0.04
 $0.08
 $0.23
 $(2.03)
Dividends declared per common share$0.12
 $
 $0.12
 $0.25
Quarter Ended 2016Mar 31 June 30 Sept 30 Dec 31
Quarter Ended 2019Quarter Ended 2019Mar 31Jun 30Sep 30Dec 31
Revenue$2,530
 $2,452
 $2,639
 $2,660
Revenue$2,650 $2,483 $2,625 $2,431 
Operating margin501
 556
 691
 632
Operating margin586 502 701 560 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (2)
87
 2
 238
 (136)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (2)
233 66 298 (120)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(13) (389) (9) (557)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxIncome from discontinued operations, net of tax
Net income (loss)$74
 $(387) $229
 $(693)Net income (loss)$233 $67 $298 $(120)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$126
 $(482) $175
 $(949)Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$154 $17 $210 $(78)
Basic income (loss) per share:       
Basic earnings (loss) per share:Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.21
 $(0.15) $0.26
 $(0.35)Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.23 $0.02 $0.32 $(0.12)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax(0.02) (0.58) 
 (1.09)
Basic income (loss) per share attributable to The AES Corporation$0.19
 $(0.73) $0.26
 $(1.44)
Diluted income (loss) per share:       
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of taxIncome from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholdersNet income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.23 $0.02 $0.32 $(0.12)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.20
 $(0.15) $0.26
 $(0.35)Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.23 $0.02 $0.32 $(0.12)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax(0.01) (0.58) 
 (1.09)
Diluted income (loss) per share attributable to The AES Corporation$0.19
 $(0.73) $0.26
 $(1.44)
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of taxIncome from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholdersNet income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.23 $0.02 $0.32 $(0.12)
Dividends declared per common share$0.11
 $
 $0.11
 $0.23
Dividends declared per common share$0.14 $$0.14 $0.28 
_____________________________
(1)Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $849 million in the third quarter of 2020 (See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense), other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $43 million and $158 million in the first and second quarters of 2020, respectively, and net equity in losses of affiliates, primarily at Guacolda, of $112 million in the third quarter of 2020 (See Note 8—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates).
(2)Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $116 million and $69 million in the second and fourth quarters of 2019, respectively (See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense), other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $92 million, and net equity in losses of affiliates, primarily at Guacolda, of $175 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 (See Note 8—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates).


(1)
Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $168 million, $90 million, $2 million185 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2020, 2019 and $277 million, for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively. See Note 19—Asset Impairment Expensefor further discussion.
2018

31. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Guacolda — In February 2021, AES Gener entered into an agreement to sell its 50% ownership interest in Guacolda, a coal-fired plant in Chile, for $34 million. The sale is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to close in the first half of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the carrying value of the investment was zero. Pre-tax loss attributable to AES was $54 million and $88 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Pre-tax income attributable to AES was $11 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Guacolda is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
AES Clean Energy — On January 4, 2021, the sPower and AES Distributed Energy development platforms were merged to form AES Clean Energy Development, which will serve as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. Pro forma information has not been presented as the impact of this transaction, individually and in the aggregate, was not material to our consolidated financial results.
Gener — On December 29, 2020, AES Gener commenced a preemptive rights offering for its existing shareholders to subscribe for up to 1,980,000,000 of newly issued shares to fund its renewable growth program. The period ended on February 5, 2021 and Inversiones Cachagua SpA, an AES subsidiary, subscribed for 1,347,200,571 shares at a cost of $205 million, increasing AES' indirect beneficial interest in AES Gener from 67.0% to 67.2%.


(2)
Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $159 million, $235 million, $79 million and $623 million, for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2016, respectively. SeeNote 19—Asset Impairment Expensefor further discussion.
186 | 2020 Annual Report
28. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Fluence — In July 2017, the Company entered into a joint venture with Siemens AG to form a global energy storage technology and services company under the name Fluence. On January 1, 2018, Siemens and AES closed

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

on the creation of the joint venture with each party holding a 50% ownership interest. Since AES does not have the ability to control Fluence, the joint venture will be accounted for as an equity affiliate.


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
The Company carried out the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that as of December 31, 2017,2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
On August 3, 2017, AES completed the acquisition of the Wind Farm Alto Sertão II and as a result, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition have been included in AES’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. Alto Sertão II’s total assets and total liabilities represented 1.5% and 1.4% of AES’s consolidated total assets and total liabilities, respectively, as of December 31, 2017. Alto Sertão II’s net income of $2.9 million for the period August 3, 2017 through December 31, 2017 was included in AES’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. As permitted by the SEC guidance, Alto Sertão II’s internal controls over financial reporting have been excluded from management’s formal evaluation of the effectiveness of AES’s disclosure controls and procedures due to the timing of acquisition.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements are prevented or detected timely.
Management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. In addition, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls is subject to risks that those internal controls may become inadequate in future periods because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures deteriorates.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in 2013. Based on this assessment, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020.
The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:


There were no changes that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20172020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.





187 | 2020 Annual Report


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of The AES Corporation:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited The AES Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The AES Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on the COSO criteria.
As indicated in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Alto Sertão II, which is included in the 2017 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 1.5% and 1.9% of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2017. Alto Sertão II's net income of $2.9 million for the period August 3, 2017 through December 31, 2017 was included in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Alto Sertão II.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, and2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, of the Company,2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”), and our report dated February 26, 2018,24, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tysons, Virginia
February 26, 201824, 2021



188 | 2020 Annual Report
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.





189 | 2020 Annual Report
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following information is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Registrant's 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which the Registrant expects will be filed on or around March 9, 20183, 2021 (the "2018"2021 Proxy Statement"):
information regarding the directors required by this item found under the heading Board of Directors - Biographies;
information regarding AES' Code of Ethics found under the heading Corporate Governance at AES - Additional Governance Matters - AES Code of Business Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines;
information regarding compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act required by this item found under the heading Additional Governance Matters - Other Governance Information - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance; and
information regarding AES' Financial Audit Committee found under the heading Board and Committee Governance Matters- Board Committees - Financial Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”).
Certain information regarding executive officers required by this Item is presented as a supplementary item in Part I hereof (pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K). The other information required by this Item, to the extent not included above, will be contained in our 20182021 Proxy Statement and is herein incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K iswill be contained in the 20182021 Proxy Statement under "Director Compensation" and "Executive Compensation" (excluding the information under the caption “Report of the Compensation Committee”) and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K iswill be contained under the caption “Report of the Compensation Committee Report” of the Proxy Statement. Such information shall not be deemed to be “filed.”
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(a)
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
(a)Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
See the information contained under the heading Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors, and Executive Officers of the 20182021 Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
(b)
(b)Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.
The following table provides information about shares of AES common stock that may be issued under AES' equity compensation plans, as of December 31, 2017:2020:
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (As of December 31, 2017)2020)
(a) (b) (c)(a)(b)(c)
Plan categoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))Plan categoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
11,490,439
(2) 
$12.75
 15,290,314
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
7,303,922 (2)$12.56 12,652,436 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— — — 
Total11,490,439
 $12.75
 15,290,314
Total7,303,922 $12.56 12,652,436 
_____________________________
(1)
The following equity compensation plans have been approved by The AES Corporation's Stockholders:
(A)
The AES Corporation 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan was adopted in 2003 and provided for 17,000,000 shares authorized for issuance thereunder. In 2008, an amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 12,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 29,000,000. In 2010, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 9,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 38,000,000. In 2015, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 7,750,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 45,750,000. The weighted average exercise price of Options outstanding under this plan included in Column (b) is $12.75 (excluding performance stock units, restricted stock units and director stock units), with 15,290,314 shares available for future issuance).
(B)
The AES Corporation 2001 Plan for outside directors adopted in 2001 provided for 2,750,000 shares authorized for issuance. There are no Options outstanding under this plan. In conjunction with the 2010 amendment to the 2003 Long Term Compensation plan, ongoing award issuance from this plan was discontinued in 2010. Any remaining shares under this plan, which are not reserved for

(1)The following equity compensation plans have been approved by The AES Corporation's Stockholders:

(a)The AES Corporation 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan was adopted in 2003 and provided for 17,000,000 shares authorized for issuance thereunder. In 2008, an amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 12,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 29,000,000. In 2010, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 9,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 38,000,000. In 2015, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 7,750,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 45,750,000. The weighted average exercise price of Options outstanding under this plan included in Column (b) is $12.56 (excluding performance stock units, restricted stock units and director stock units), with 12,652,436 shares available for future issuance.
(b)The AES Corporation Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for directors provided for 2,000,000 shares authorized for issuance. Column (b) excludes the Director stock units granted thereunder. In conjunction with the 2010 amendment to the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan, ongoing award issuance from this plan was discontinued in 2010 as Director stock units will be issued from the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan. Any remaining shares under this plan, which are not reserved for



190 | 2020 Annual Report
issuance under outstanding awards, are not available for future issuance and thus the amount of 2,088,633161,688 shares is not included in Column (c) above.
(2)Includes 3,039,035 (of which 839,278 are vested and 2,199,757 are unvested) shares underlying PSU and RSU awards (assuming 2018 and 2020 PSUs median performance and 2019 PSU maximum performance), 1,599,308 shares underlying Director stock unit awards, and 2,665,579 shares issuable upon the exercise of Stock Option grants, for an aggregate number of 7,303,922 shares.
(C)
The AES Corporation Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for directors provided for 2,000,000 shares authorized for issuance. Column (b) excludes the Director stock units granted thereunder. In conjunction with the 2010 amendment to the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan, ongoing award issuance from this plan was discontinued in 2010 as Director stock units will be issued from the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan. Any remaining shares under this plan, which are not reserved for issuance under outstanding awards, are not available for future issuance and thus the amount of 105,341 shares is not included in Column (c) above.
(2)
Includes 4,678,447 (of which 575,721 are vested and 4,102,726 are unvested) shares underlying PSU and RSU awards (assuming performance at a median level), 1,642,551 shares underlying Director stock unit awards, and 5,169,441 shares issuable upon the exercise of Stock Option grants, for an aggregate number of 11,490,439 shares.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information regarding related party transactions required by this item iswill be included in the 20182021 Proxy Statement found under the headingsTransactions with Related Persons Person Policies and Procedures and Board and Committee Governance Matters and are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 iswill be included in the 20182021 Proxy Statement under the headings Information Regarding The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees, and Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures and is incorporated herein by reference.





191 | 2020 Annual Report
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESSCHEDULE
(a)Financial Statements.
(a)
Financial Statements.
(b)Exhibits.
(b)
Exhibits.
3.1
3.2
4There are numerous instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term indebtedness of the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries, none of which exceeds ten percent of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of such agreements to the Commission upon request. Since these documents are not required filings under Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Company has elected to file certain of these documents as Exhibits 4.(a)—4.(n)(j).
4.(a)
4.(b)
4.(c)
4.(d)(b)
4.(e)(c)
4.(f)
4.(g)
4.(h)
4.(i)
4.(j)
4.(k)
4.(l)
4.(m)(d)
4.(n)(e)
10.14.(f)
4.(g)
4.(h)
4.(i)
4.(j)
4.(k)
10.1The AES Corporation Profit Sharing and Stock Ownership Plan are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(c)(1) of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-49262) filed on July 2, 1992. (P)
10.2The AES Corporation Incentive Stock Option Plan of 1991, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 (SEC File No. 00019281). (P)
10.3Applied Energy Services, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan of 1982 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-40483). (P)
10.4Deferred Compensation Plan for Executive Officers, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-40483). (P)
10.5
10.6



192 | 2020 Annual Report
10.7The AES Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.63 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (SEC File No. 00019281). (P)
10.7A


10.8
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.10A
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.18A
10.19
10.19A
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.2610.25
10.2710.26
10.27A10.26A
SixthSeventh Amended and Restated Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of July 26, 2013December 20, 2019 among The AES Corporation, a Delaware corporation, the Banks listed on the signature pages thereof, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Runner, Banc of America Securities LLC, as Lead Arranger and Book Runner and Co-Syndication Agent, Barclays Capital, as Lead Arranger and Book Runner and Co-Syndication Agent, RBS Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Runner and Co-Syndication Agent and Union Bank,Citibank, N.A., Mizuho Bank Ltd. and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as Joint Lead ArrangerArrangers and Joint Book Runner and Co-Syndication AgentRunners is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1.A of the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2013.December 23, 2019.
10.27B10.27
10.27C
10.27D
10.27E
10.28
10.2910.28



193 | 2020 Annual Report


10.3121.1
10.32
10.33
12
21.1
23.1
24
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INSXBRL Instance Document (filed herewith).
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed herewith).
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
(c)
Schedules
101The AES Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in Inline XBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Cover Page, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (vi) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
(c)Schedule
Schedule I—Financial Information of Registrant





194 | 2020 Annual Report
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE AES CORPORATION
(Company)
Date:February 26, 201824, 2021By:
/s/   ANDRÉS GLUSKI        
Name:Andrés Gluski
President, Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameTitleDate
Name*TitleDate
*President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
Andrés GluskiFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
*Director
Charles L. HarringtonJanet G. DavidsonFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
*Director
Kristina M. Johnson*DirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Tarun KhannaFebruary 24, 2021
*Director
Tarun Khanna*DirectorFebruary 26, 2018
*Director
Holly K. KoeppelFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
*Director
Julia M. LaulisFebruary 24, 2021
*Director
James H. MillerFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
*Director
Alain MoniéFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
*Director
John B. MorseFebruary 26, 2018
*Director
Moises NaimFebruary 26, 2018
*
Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director

Charles O. RossottiJohn B. MorseFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
*Director
Moises NaimFebruary 24, 2021
*Director
Teresa M. SebastianFebruary 24, 2021
*Director
Jeffrey W. UbbenFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
/s/ THOMAS M. O'FLYNNGUSTAVO PIMENTAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Thomas M. O'FlynnGustavo PimentaFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
/s/ SARAH R. BLAKESHERRY L. KOHANVice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
Sarah R. BlakeSherry L. KohanFebruary 26, 201824, 2021

*By:/s/ PAUL L. FREEDMANFebruary 26, 201824, 2021
Attorney-in-fact





S-1 | 2020 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Schedules other than that listed above are omitted as the information is either not applicable, not required, or has been furnished in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto included in Item 8 hereof.


















































See Notes to Schedule I








S-2 | 2020 Annual Report

THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019
 December 31,December 31,
 2017 201620202019
 (in millions)(in millions)
ASSETS    ASSETS
Current Assets:    Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $10
 $109
Cash and cash equivalents$70 $11 
Restricted cash 
 3
Accounts and notes receivable from subsidiaries 143
 155
Accounts and notes receivable from subsidiaries188 238 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 27
 39
Prepaid expenses and other current assets55 35 
Total current assets 180
 306
Total current assets313 284 
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries and affiliates 8,239
 7,561
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries and affiliates6,426 6,782 
Office Equipment:    Office Equipment:
Cost 27
 26
Cost29 27 
Accumulated depreciation (18) (16)Accumulated depreciation(22)(20)
Office equipment, net 9
 10
Office equipment, net
Other Assets:    Other Assets:
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization 3
 5
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2 and $1, respectively 5
 5
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $6 and $5, respectivelyDeferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $6 and $5, respectively
Deferred income taxes 289
 1,041
Deferred income taxes25 14 
Other assets 2
 13
Other assets20 16 
Total other assets 299
 1,064
Total other assets49 36 
Total assets $8,727
 $8,941
Total assets$6,795 $7,109 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:    Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $18
 $18
Accounts payable$15 $20 
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries 381
 304
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries184 339 
Accrued and other liabilities 246
 250
Accrued and other liabilities344 221 
Senior notes payable—current portion 5
 
Senior notes payable—current portion
Total current liabilities 650
 572
Total current liabilities543 585 
Long-term Liabilities:    Long-term Liabilities:
Senior notes payable 4,625
 4,154
Senior notes payable3,430 3,391 
Junior subordinated notes and debentures payable 
 517
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries 967
 883
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries28 28 
Other long-term liabilities 20
 21
Other long-term liabilities160 109 
Total long-term liabilities 5,612
 5,575
Total long-term liabilities3,618 3,528 
Stockholders' equity:    Stockholders' equity:
Common stock 8
 8
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital 8,501
 8,592
Additional paid-in capital7,561 7,776 
Accumulated deficit (2,276) (1,146)Accumulated deficit(680)(692)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,876) (2,756)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,397)(2,229)
Treasury stock (1,892) (1,904)Treasury stock(1,858)(1,867)
Total stockholders' equity 2,465
 2,794
Total stockholders' equity2,634 2,996 
Total liabilities and equity $8,727
 $8,941
Total liabilities and equity$6,795 $7,109 


See Notes to Schedule I.







S-3 | 2020 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019, AND 2018
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015For the Years Ended December 31,202020192018
 (in millions)(in millions)
Revenue from subsidiaries and affiliates $28
 $14
 $24
Revenue from subsidiaries and affiliates$29 $30 $36 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries and affiliates 630
 (615) 859
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries and affiliates383 674 1,909 
Interest income 49
 19
 24
Interest income31 53 39 
General and administrative expenses (158) (144) (154)General and administrative expenses(125)(148)(142)
Other income 5
 7
 24
Other income26 25 
Other expense (554) (65) (6)Other expense(6)(103)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (92) (14) (105)Loss on extinguishment of debt(146)(5)(171)
Interest expense (317) (344) (364)Interest expense(163)(197)(220)
Income (loss) before income taxes (409) (1,142) 302
Income (loss) before income taxes29 305 1,476 
Income tax benefit (expense) (752) 12
 4
Income tax benefit (expense)17 (2)(273)
Net income (loss) $(1,161) $(1,130) $306
Net income (loss)$46 $303 $1,203 
See Notes to Schedule I.





S-4 | 2020 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSSINCOME (LOSS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, AND 20152018
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$(1,161) $(1,130) $306
Foreign currency translation activity:     
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $11, $1 and $1, respectively18
 117
 (674)
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods643
 992
 
Total foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax661
 1,109
 (674)
Derivative activity:     
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $13, $(5) and $4, respectively(14) 2
 (5)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $1, $1 and $(12), respectively37
 28
 48
Total change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax23
 30
 43
Pension activity:     
Prior service cost for the period, net of income tax expense of $1, $5 and $0, respectively1
 9
 1
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $6, $10 and $(7), respectively(20) (22) 18
Reclassification of earnings due to amortization of net actuarial loss, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(126), $2 and $(2), respectively248
 1
 2
Total change in unfunded pension obligation229
 (12) 21
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)913
 1,127
 (610)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS$(248) $(3) $(304)
202020192018
(in millions)
NET INCOME$46 $303 $1,203 
Foreign currency translation activity:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(8), $1 and $2, respectively(23)(214)
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods192 23 (21)
Total foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax192 (235)
Derivative activity:
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit of $90, $53 and $16, respectively(309)(202)(64)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $19, $4 and $13, respectively72 36 78 
Total change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax(237)(166)14 
Pension activity:
Prior service cost for the period, net of income tax expense of $1, $0 and $1, respectively(2)
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $4, $6 and $(1), respectively(12)(16)
Reclassification of earnings, net of income tax expense of $0, $13 and $2, respectively27 
Total change in unfunded pension obligation(12)12 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(57)(154)(214)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)$(11)$149 $989 
See Notes to Schedule I.





S-5 | 2020 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019, AND 2018
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015For the Years Ended December 31,202020192018
 (in millions)(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities $148
 $818
 $475
Net cash provided by operating activities$434 $583 $409 
Investing Activities:      Investing Activities:
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of expensesProceeds from the sale of business interests, net of expenses412 196 1,222 
Investment in and net advances to subsidiaries (339) (650) (221)Investment in and net advances to subsidiaries(652)(596)(216)
Return of capital 243
 247
 501
Return of capital346 411 242 
Decrease in restricted cash 3
 29
 49
Additions to property, plant and equipment (13) (12) (11)Additions to property, plant and equipment(8)(8)(13)
Purchase of short term investments, netPurchase of short term investments, net(1)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (106) (386) 318
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities97 1,235 
Financing Activities:      Financing Activities:
Borrowings under the revolver, net 207
 
 
(Repayments) Borrowings under the revolver, net(Repayments) Borrowings under the revolver, net(110)180 (207)
Borrowings of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities 1,025
 500
 575
Borrowings of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities3,397 1,000 
Repayments of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities (1,353) (808) (915)Repayments of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities(3,366)(450)(1,933)
Loans from subsidiaries 309
 183
 
Purchase of treasury stock 
 (79) (482)
Loans from (Repayments to) subsidiariesLoans from (Repayments to) subsidiaries25 40 (143)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 1
 1
 4
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Common stock dividends paid (317) (290) (276)Common stock dividends paid(381)(362)(344)
Payments for deferred financing costs (12) (12) (6)Payments for deferred financing costs(38)(3)(11)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 
 (2) 
Other financing (7) (3) (18)Other financing(3)(4)(5)
Net cash used in financing activities (147) (510) (1,118)Net cash used in financing activities(472)(593)(1,636)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 6
 1
 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(1)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (99) (77) (325)
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalentsIncrease (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents59 (8)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning 109
 186
 511
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning11 19 10 
Cash and cash equivalents, ending $10
 $109
 $186
Cash and cash equivalents, ending$70 $11 $19 
Supplemental Disclosures:      Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized $282
 $296
 $314
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$156 $192 $232 
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds $2
 $6
 $
Cash payments (refunds) for income taxesCash payments (refunds) for income taxes$(8)$(5)$10 
See Notes to Schedule I.





S-6 | 2020 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I
NOTES TO SCHEDULE I
1. Application of Significant Accounting Principles
The Schedule I Condensed Financial Information of the Parent includes the accounts of The AES Corporation (the “Parent Company”) and certain holding companies.
ACCOUNTING FOR SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES — The Parent Company has accounted for the earnings of its subsidiaries on the equity method in the financial information.
INCOME TAXES — Positions taken on the Parent Company's income tax return which satisfy a more-likely-than-not threshold will be recognized in the financial statements. The income tax expense or benefit computed for the Parent Company reflects the tax assets and liabilities on a stand-alone basis and the effect of filing a consolidated U.S. income tax return with certain other affiliated companies as well as effects of U.S. tax law reform enacted in 2017.
ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM SUBSIDIARIES — Amounts have been shown in current or long-term assets based on terms in agreements with subsidiaries, but payment is dependent upon meeting conditions precedent in the subsidiary loan agreements.
2. Debt
Senior and SecuredUnsecured Notes and Loans Payable ($ in millions)
December 31,
Interest RateMaturity20202019
Senior Unsecured Note4.00%2021500 
Senior Secured Term LoanLIBOR + 1.75%202218 
Senior Unsecured Note4.875%2023613 
Senior Unsecured Note4.50%2023500 
Drawings on revolving credit facilityLIBOR + 1.75%202470 180 
Senior Unsecured Note5.50%202463 
Senior Unsecured Note5.50%2025544 
Senior Unsecured Note3.30%2025900 
Senior Unsecured Note6.00%2026500 
Senior Unsecured Note1.375%2026800 
Senior Unsecured Note5.125%2027500 
Senior Unsecured Note3.95%2030700 
Senior Unsecured Note2.45%20311,000 
Unamortized (discounts)/premiums & debt issuance (costs)(40)(22)
Subtotal$3,430 $3,396 
Less: Current maturities(5)
Total$3,430 $3,391 
      December 31,
  Interest Rate Maturity 2017 2016
Senior Unsecured Note LIBOR + 3.00% 2019 $
 $240
Senior Unsecured Note 8.00% 2020 228
 469
Senior Unsecured Note 7.38% 2021 690
 966
Drawings on secured credit facility LIBOR + 2.00% 2021 207
 
Senior Secured Term Loan LIBOR + 2.00% 2022 521
 
Senior Unsecured Note 4.88% 2023 713
 713
Senior Unsecured Note 5.50% 2024 738
 738
Senior Unsecured Note 5.50% 2025 573
 573
Senior Unsecured Note 6.00% 2026 500
 500
Senior Unsecured Note 5.13% 2027 500
 
Unamortized (discounts)/premiums & debt issuance (costs)     (40) (45)
Subtotal     $4,630
 $4,154
Less: Current maturities     (5) 
Total     $4,625
 $4,154

Junior Subordinated Notes Payable ($ in millions)
      December 31,
  Interest Rate Maturity 2017 2016
Term Convertible Trust Securities 6.75% 2029 $
 $517
FUTURE MATURITIES OF RECOURSE DEBT — As of December 31, 20172020 scheduled maturities are presented in the following table (in millions):
December 31,Annual Maturities
2021$
2022
2023
202470 
2025900 
Thereafter2,500 
Unamortized (discount)/premium & debt issuance (costs)(40)
Total debt$3,430 
December 31,Annual Maturities
2018$5
20195
2020234
2021902
2022500
Thereafter3,024
Unamortized (discount)/premium & debt issuance (costs)(40)
Total debt$4,630
3. Dividends from Subsidiaries and Affiliates
Cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries were $1.2$1.0 billion, $1$1.0 billion and $748 million$1.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, $302 million and $200 million, respectively, of the dividends paid to the Parent Company are derived from the sale of business interests and are classified as an investing activity for cash flow purposes. All other dividends are



S-7 | 2020 Annual Report
classified as operating activities. There were no cash dividends received from affiliates accounted for by the equity method for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015.

2018.

4. Guarantees and Letters of Credit
GUARANTEES — In connection with certain of its project financing, acquisition,acquisitions and dispositions, power purchasepurchases and other agreements, the Parent Company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. These obligations and commitments, excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below, were limited as of December 31, 2017,2020 by the terms of the agreements, to an aggregate of approximately $842 million$1.4 billion, representing 2269 agreements with individual exposures ranging from $1 millionup to $272$157 million. These amounts exclude normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
LETTERS OF CREDIT — At December 31, 2017,2020, the Parent Company had $36 million in letters of credit outstanding under the senior secured credit facility, representing 21 agreements with individual exposures up to $13 million, and $52$77 million in letters of credit outstanding under the senior unsecuredrevolving credit facility, representing 417 agreements with individual exposures up to $62 million, and $110 million in letters of credit outstanding under the unsecured credit facilities, representing 25 agreements with individual exposures ranging from $2 millionup to $26$56 million. During 2017,the year ended December 31, 2020, the Parent Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 0.25%1% to 2.25%3% per annum on the outstanding amounts.

S-7