Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Form 10-K

10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
(Mark One)

x

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2019
Or

o

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from ________to _______

For the Transition Period from
to
Commission File No.
 001-34037

Commission Company Name: SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES INC

______________________________________________________________________________________________

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

75-2379388

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston,
TX

77002

Houston, TX

77002

Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713)
654-2200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading symbol

Trading
symbol
Name of each exchange
on which registered

Common Stock, $.001 par value

SPN

SPN
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨
    No  
x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨
    No  
x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x
    No  
¨

Indicate

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x
    No  
¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer¨

Accelerated Filer x

filer

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated
filer
Smaller reporting company¨

Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨
    No  
x

At June 30, 2019, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by
non-affiliates
of the registrant was $205.4$205.4 million. At February 25,June 1, 2020 there were 15,798,42815,798,919 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain


EXPLANATORY NOTE
Superior Energy Services, Inc. (the Company, we, us or our) filed its Annual Report on Form
 10-K
 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the Form
10-K)
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on February 28, 2020. The Company is filing this Amendment No. 1 to the Form
 10-K
(the Form
10-K/A
or this Amendment) solely for the purpose of including the Part III information. This information called for was previously omitted from the original Form
10-K
in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form
10-K,
which permits the information in Part III to be incorporated in the Form
10-K
by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement or an amendment to the
Form10-K
if such statement or amendment is filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the Company’s fiscal
year-end.
The Company is filing this Form
10-K/A
to include Part III information because the Company did not file a definitive proxy statement containing such information within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by the Form
10-K.
This Form
 10-K/A
 hereby amends and restates in their entirety Items 10 11, 12, 13 andthrough 14 of Part III is incorporated by reference fromof the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.

Form


 10-K.

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AnnualThe Company is also relying on the

45-day
extension provided by an order issued on March 4, 2020 by the SEC under Section 36 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), granting exemptions from specified provisions of the Exchange Act and certain rules thereunder, as amended by Release No.
 34-88465
issued on March 25, 2020 (as amended, the Order) to delay the filing of this Form
10-K/A
after April 30, 2020, which is the original filing deadline (the Original Filing Deadline) for filing the Part III information. On April 28, 2020, the Company filed the Current Report on Form
8-K
with the SEC to indicate its intention to rely on the Order for the extension of the filing of this Form
10-K/A.
Consistent with our statements made in the Form
8-K,
the Company was unable to file this Form
10-K/A
until the date hereof because the Company’s operations have experienced disruptions due to the circumstances surrounding the
COVID-19
pandemic including, but not limited to, suggested and mandated social distancing and stay home orders. These mandates and the resulting office closures and staff reductions have severely limited access to the Company’s facilities by the Company’s financial reporting and accounting staff as well as other advisors involved in the preparation of this Form
10-K/A
and impacted the Company’s ability to fulfill required preparation and review processes and procedures with respect to this Form
10-K/A.
In light of the impact of the factors described above, the Company was unable to compile and review certain information necessary to permit the Company to timely file this
10-K/A
by the Original Filing Deadline without unreasonable effort and expense.
Pursuant to Rule
 12b-15
 under the Exchange Act, this Form
 10-K/A
 also contains new certifications by the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Accordingly, Item 15(b) of Part IV is amended and restated to include the currently dated certifications as exhibits to this Form
10-K/A.
Because no financial statements have been amended by or included in this Form
 10-K/A
 and this Form
 10-K/A
 does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation
 S-K,
 paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of the certifications have been omitted.
Except as expressly noted in this Form
 10-K/A,
 this Form
 10-K/A
 does not reflect events occurring after the original filing of the Form
 10-K for

 or modify or update in any way any of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

other disclosures contained in the Form


 including, without limitation, the financial statements. Accordingly, this Form
 10-K/A
 should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form
 10-K
 and the Company’s other filings with the SEC.

2


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K

10-K/A
and other documents filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)SEC contain, and future oral or written statements or press releases by us and our management may contain, forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks” and “estimates,” variations of such words and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
10-K/A
or such other materials regarding our financial position, financial performance, liquidity, strategic alternatives, market outlook, future capital needs, capital allocation plans, business strategies and other plans and objectives of our management for future operations and activities are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by our management in light of its experience and prevailing circumstances on the date such statements are made. Such forward-looking statements, and the assumptions on which they are based, are inherently speculative and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

the conditions in the oil and gas industry;

the effects of public health threats, pandemics and epidemics, like the recent
 COVID-19
 pandemic, and the adverse impact thereof on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, including, but not limited to, our growth, operating costs, supply chain, labor availability, logistical capabilities, customer demand and industry demand generally, margins, utilization, cash position, taxes, the price of our securities, the ability to access capital markets;
the ability of the members of OPEC+ to agree on and to maintain crude oil price and production controls;
our outstanding debt obligations and the potential effect of limiting our ability to fund future growth;

necessary capital financing may not be available at economic rates or at all;

volatility of our common stock;

operating hazards, including the significant possibility of accidents resulting in personal injury or death, or property damage for which we may have limited or no insurance coverage or indemnification rights;

we may not be fully indemnified against losses incurred due to catastrophic events;

claims, litigation or other proceedings that require cash payments or could impair financial condition;

credit risk associated with our customer base;

the effect of regulatory programs and environmental matters on our operations or prospects;

the impact that unfavorable or unusual weather conditions could have on our operations;

the potential inability to retain key employees and skilled workers;

political, legal, economic and other risks and uncertainties associated with our international operations;

laws, regulations or practices in foreign countries could materially restrict our operations or expose us to additional risks;

potential changes in tax laws, adverse positions taken by tax authorities or tax audits impacting our operating results;

changes in competitive and technological factors affecting our operations;

risks associated with the uncertainty of macroeconomic and business conditions worldwide;

potential impacts of cyber-attacks on our operations may be subject to cyber-attacks;

operations;

counterparty risks associated with reliance on key suppliers;

challenges with estimating our potential liabilities related to our oil and natural gas property;

and

risks associated with potential changes of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) security and bonding requirements for offshore platforms;

the consummation of the Combination (as defined herein) and the timing thereof;

expenses incurred in connection with the Combination;

failure to complete the Combination could negatively impact our business and financial results;

business uncertainties and contractual restrictions related to the Superior Energy U.S. Business (as defined herein) until the Combination closes;

the Combination may distract management personnel and other key employees;

future potential litigation against us or Forbes could prevent the completion of the Combination or result in the payment of damages;

the interests of some of our executive officers in the Combination may differ from the interests of our stockholders generally; and

failure to achieve the anticipated return on our investment in Newco (as defined herein);

platforms.

These risks and other uncertainties related to our business are described in detail below in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report onthe Form
10-K.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Investors are cautioned that many of the assumptions on which our forward-looking statements are based are likely to change after such statements are made, including for example the market prices of oil and gas and regulations affecting oil and gas operations, which we cannot control or anticipate. Further, we may make changes to our business strategies and plans (including our capital spending and capital allocation plans) at any time and without notice, based on any changes in the above-listed factors, our assumptions or otherwise, any of which could or will affect our results. 

For all these reasons, actual events and results may differ materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or implied by us in our forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any of our forward-looking statements for any reason, notwithstanding any changes in our

assumptions, changes in our business plans, our actual experience, or other changes. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.



PART I

III

Item 1. Business

General

We provide10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Board of Directors
Our board of directors (the Board or the Board of Directors) is responsible for oversight of our management, providing strategic direction and establishing broad corporate policies. In addition, our Board addresses the Company’s organizational needs, navigates competitive challenges, ensures succession and appropriately manages risks.
Set forth below is biographical information regarding the current members of our board of directors (the Board or the Board of Directors).
           
Name
 
Age
  
Director Since
  
Principal Occupation
David D. Dunlap
  
58
   
2010
  
Chief Executive Officer and President
James M. Funk
  
70
   
2005
  
President of J.M. Funk & Associates
Terence E. Hall
  
74
   
1995
  
Founder and Chairman of the Board
Peter D. Kinnear
  
73
   
2011
  
Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of FMC Technologies, Inc.
Janiece M. Longoria
  
67
   
2015
  
Former Chairman of the Port of Houston Authority
Michael M. McShane
  
66
   
2012
  
Advisor to Advent International
W. Matt Ralls
  
70
   
2012
  
Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Rowan Companies plc
David D. Dunlap
has served as our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since 2010 and President since 2011. From 2007 until he joined the Company in 2010, Mr. Dunlap served as Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer of BJ Services Company (BJ Services), a wide varietyrenowned well services provider. He joined BJ Services in 1984 as a District Engineer. Prior to 1995, he served as Vice President — Sales for the Coastal Division of servicesNorth America and productsU.S. Sales and Marketing Manager for BJ Services. Prior to being promoted to Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Dunlap held the position of Vice President — International Division from 1995 to 2007. Mr. Dunlap currently serves as director and trustee on the boards of numerous
non-profit
organizations.
James M. Funk
is currently the President of J.M. Funk & Associates, an oil and gas business consulting firm, and has more than 40 years of experience in the energy industry. We serve major, nationalDr. Funk served as Senior Vice President of Equitable Resources (now EQT Corporation) and independent oilPresident of Equitable Production Co. from June 2000 to 2003. He worked for 23 years with Shell Oil Company and natural gas explorationits affiliates and production companies aroundis a Certified Petroleum Geologist.
Mr. Funk has served on the worldboard of directors of Range Resources Corporation since 2008.
Terence E. Hall
has served as the Chairman of our Board since 1995. Mr. Hall is the founder of the Company and we offer productsserved as CEO of the Company and servicesits predecessors from 1980 until 2010.
Peter D. Kinnear
held numerous management, operations and marketing roles with respectFMC Technologies, Inc. (FTI) and FMC Corporation from 1971 until his retirement in 2011. Mr. Kinnear served as FTI’s CEO from 2007 to 2011, Chairman of the various phasesBoard from 2008 to 2011, President from 2006 to 2010 and Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007.
Janiece M. Longoria
is the Former Chairman of the Port of Houston Authority. She currently serves as Vice Chairman of the University of Texas System Board of Regents, and on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Houston Branch. Formerly, Ms. Longoria practiced law as a well’s economic life cycle. We report our operating resultssecurities and commercial litigator for 23 years at Ogden Gibson Broocks Longoria & Hall LLP, and previously at Andrews & Kurth LLP.
Michael M. McShane
serves as an Advisor to Advent International, a global private equity fund. Mr. McShane served as a director, President and CEO of Grant Prideco, Inc. from 2002 until the completion of its merger with National Oilwell Varco, Inc. in four business segments: Drilling Products2008, having also served as the chairman of its board from 2003 to 2008.

Prior to joining Grant Prideco, Mr. McShane was Senior Vice President — Finance and Services; Onshore CompletionChief Financial Officer and Workover Services; Production Services;a director of BJ Services from 1990 to 2002 and Technical Solutions. Given our long-term strategyVice President — Finance from 1987 to 1990 when BJ Services was a division of geographic expansion, weBaker Hughes Incorporated.
Mr. McShane has served on the board of directors of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. since 2012, where he has served as chairman of the board of directors since 2017. He has also provide supplemental segment revenue information in three geographic areas: U.S. land; U.S. offshore;served on the board of directors of Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and International.

For information about our operating segmentsOasis Petroleum, Inc. since 2010.

W. Matt Ralls
previously served as Executive Chairman, CEO and financial information by operating segmentPresident of Rowan Companies plc (Rowan) from 2014 to 2016, the CEO from 2009 until 2014, and geographic area, referPresident from 2009 to “Management’s Discussion2013. Mr. Ralls served as Executive Vice President and AnalysisChief Operating Officer of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Developments

The Combination

On December 18, 2019, we entered into a definitive merger agreement (the Merger Agreement) to divest our U.S. service rig, coiled tubing, wireline, pressure control, flowback, fluid management and accommodations service lines (the Superior Energy U.S. Business) and combine them with Forbes Energy Services Ltd.’s (Forbes) complimentary service lines to create a new, publicly traded consolidation platform for U.S. completion, production and water solutions (the Combination).

FollowingGlobalSantaFe Corporation from 2005 until the completion of the Combination,merger of GlobalSantaFe with Transocean, Inc. in 2007, prior to which is expectedhe had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to close in the second quarter of 2020, we will remain a globally diversified oilfield services company built around the following key product and service lines: premium drill pipe, bottom hole assemblies, completion tools and products, hydraulic workover, snubbing and production services and well control services.

Under the terms2005.

Mr. Ralls has served as chairman of the Merger Agreement, the Superior Energy U.S. Business and Forbes will be merged into a newly formed company (Newco). At the closingboard of the Combination, we will receive 49.9%directors of Newco’s issued and outstanding voting Class A common stock (the Class A Stock) and 100% of Newco’s issued and outstanding non-voting Class B common stock (the Class B Stock), which will collectively represent an approximate 65% economic interest in Newco. Our and Forbes’ economic interests in Newco are subject to adjustment within certain parameters based on Forbes’ net debt position calculated at closing pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In addition, certain lenders under Forbes’ existing term loan (the Forbes Term Loan) will exchange their portion of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Forbes Term Loan for approximately $30.0 million in newly issued mandatory convertible preferred shares of Newco (the Preferred Shares), which will be entitled to cash dividends at a rate of 5% per annum, payable semi-annually, and,Pacific Drilling S.A. since 2018. He has also served on the third anniversaryboard of directors of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. since 2017 and Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation since 2011.
Meeting Attendance
Our Board has adopted a policy that recommends all directors personally attend each Annual Meeting. All of our directors attended our 2019 Annual Meeting.
In 2019, our Board held 7 meetings, and the closingcommittees held a total of 12 meetings. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of our Board meetings and the Combination will be subject to mandatory conversion into shares of Newco’s Class A Stock. After giving effect to such conversion, we would own an approximate 52% economic interest in Newco and Forbes’ existing stockholders would own an approximate 48% economic interest in Newco.

The Combination has been unanimously approved by our and Forbes’ Boards of Directors as well as the special committee of the Board of Directors of Forbes. Newco filed a joint proxy statement/prospectus on February 12, 2020, pursuant to which Forbes will solicit proxies of its stockholders to approve the Combination at a special meeting of stockholders. However, certain stockholders of Forbes who will collectively own a majority of Forbes’ common stock on the record date for Forbes’ special meeting have committed to vote the shares they beneficially own in favor of the Combination and have the ability to approve the Combination without the votemeetings of any other stockholdercommittees of Forbes.

Related Financing Transactions

Aswhich the director was a condition of the Combination, SESI, L.L.C. (SESI), our wholly owned subsidiary, consummated an offer to exchange (the Exchange Offer) up to $635.0 million of SESI’s previously outstanding $800.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the Original Notes) for up to $635.0 million aggregate principal amount of SESI’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the New Notes) and conducted a concurrent consent solicitation (the Consent Solicitation) to amend the liens covenantmember in the indenture governing the Original Notes (the Original Notes Indenture) to permit the issuance of the Superior Secured Notes described below (the Proposed Amendment) upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in SESI’s offering memorandum and consent solicitation statement,

2019.

4

Director Independence

dated as of January 6, 2020 (as amended by the press releases dated January 16, 2020, January 22, 2020, January 31, 2020, February 14, 2020, February 18, 2020, February 19, 2020, February 20, 2020 and February 24, 2020 issued by the Company and Supplement No. 1 to the Offering Memorandum and Consent Solicitation, dated as of January 31, 2020 (the Offering Memorandum)). A supplemental indenture by and among SESI, the guarantors party thereto and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Proposed Amendment was executed on February 14, 2020. The Original Notes outstanding after the Exchange Offer are governed by the Original Notes Indenture, as amended by the Proposed Amendment, provided

Our Board has determined that the Proposed Amendment will only become operative immediately prior to the occurrence of the Combination.

The Exchange Offer expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 21, 2020, and $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding Original Notes were validly tendered for exchange and not withdrawn, representing 77.24% of the aggregate principal amount of Original Notes outstanding upon commencement of the Exchange Offer. SESI accepted all validly tendered Original Notes and issued $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes pursuant to an indenture dated February 24, 2020 by and among SESI, the guarantors party thereto and UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee (the New Notes Indenture).

Substantially concurrently with the consummation of the Combination, eligible note holders will receive, in exchange for $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes, on a pro rata basis: (1) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of 9.750% Senior Second Lien Secured Notes due 2025 to be issued by Newco (the Newco Secured Notes), (2) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of 8.750% Senior Second Lien Secured Notes due 2026 to be issued by SESI (the Superior Secured Notes), (3) $131.3 million in cash and (4) $6.35 million in cash constituting the total consent payment (the Combination Exchange). The indentures governing the Newco Secured Notes and the Superior Secured Notes will each contain restrictive covenants customary for issuances of high-yield secured notes of this type. On February 20, 2020, we entered into an amendment to the Merger Agreement (the Amendment). The Amendment amends certain covenants, among other things, to account for the amended terms of the Exchange Offer.

Exit and Discontinuation of the Hydraulic Fracturing Service Line

On December 10, 2019, our indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, Pumpco Energy Services, Inc. (Pumpco), completed its existing hydraulic fracturing field operations, and we determined to discontinue, wind down and exit Pumpco’s hydraulic fracturing operations. We intend to maintain an adequate number of employees to efficiently wind down Pumpco’s business and divest Pumpco’s assets over time. The financial results of Pumpco’s operations have historically been included in our Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment. Pumpco’s business is reflected as discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018Messrs. Funk, Kinnear, McShane and 2017Ralls and its assetsMs. Longoria are in the process of being divested. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of discontinued operations. Discontinuing hydraulic fracturing aligns with our strategic objective to divest assets and service lines that do not compete for investment in the current market environment. Net proceeds from the divestiture of Pumpco’s assets will be used to reduce debt.

Reverse Stock Split

At a special meeting of stockholders held on December 18, 2019, our stockholders voted to approve a proposal authorizing our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock (the Reverse Stock Split) and to proportionately reduce the number of our authorized shares of common stock. Following the special meeting of stockholders, our Board of Directors approved a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split.

As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, each 10 pre-split shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split automatically were converted to one issued and outstanding share of common stock without any action on the part of our stockholders. No fractional shares of common stock were issued“independent directors” as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, any stockholder who would have been entitled to a fractional share received a cash payment in lieu of such fractional shares. The total number of shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue has also been reduceddefined by the same ratio.

Unless otherwise indicated, the number of shares of common stock outstanding and per-share amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of the Reverse Stock Split. The par value of our common stock remains at $0.001 per share.

Resumption of Trading on the New York Stock Exchange

On September 26, 2019, the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) suspended tradinglisting standards.

Executive Officers
Set forth below is certain information regarding our executive officers as of June 1, 2020, including all offices and positions held by each in the past five years.
Name
Age
Offices Held and Term of Office
David D. Dunlap
58
President and Chief Executive Officer, since February 2011
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
48
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, since March 2018
Executive Vice President of International Services, from February 2012 to February 2018
James W. Spexarth
52
Chief Accounting Officer, since March 2018
Vice President and Corporate Controller, from August 2013 to February 2018
A. Patrick Bernard
62
Executive Vice President, since April 2016
Senior Executive Vice President, from July 2006 to March 2016
Brian K. Moore
63
Executive Vice President of Corporate Services, since April 2016
Senior Executive Vice President of North America Services, from February 2012 to March 2016
William B. Masters
63
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, since March 2008
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our common stockdirectors or executive officers.
2

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and commenced delisting proceedings dueexecutive officers to our “abnormally low” stock price. Followingfile with the NYSE’s suspensionSEC reports of tradingownership and changes in ownership of our common stock, we appealed the NYSE staff’s determination. On September 27, 2019,equity securities. Based solely upon our common stock commenced trading on the OTC Markets and, on October 4, 2019, our common stock also commenced trading on the OTCQX Best Market, operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. The NYSE formally withdrew the delisting determination, and, on December 26, 2019, our common stock resumed trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “SPN.”

Products and Services

We offer a wide variety of specialized oilfield services and equipment generally categorized by their typical use during the economic life of a well. A descriptionreview of the productsForms 3 and services offered by each4 filed during 2019 and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that all required reports were timely filed during 2019.

Board Committees
Each of our four segments is as follows:

Drilling Products and Services – Includes downhole drilling tools and surface rentals.

Downhole drilling tools – Includes rentalsBoard’s standing committees has adopted a written charter that has been approved by our Board. Copies of tubulars, such as primary drill pipe strings, landing strings, completion tubulars and associated accessories, and manufacturing and rentals of bottom hole tools, including stabilizers, non-magnetic drill collars and hole openers.

Surface rentals – Includes rentals of temporary onshore and offshore accommodation modules and accessories.

Onshore Completion and Workover Services – Includes fluid management and workover services.

Fluid management – Includes services used to obtain, move, store and dispose of fluids that are involved in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas, including mobile piping systems, specialized trucks, fracturing tanks and other assets that transport, heat, pump and dispose of fluids.

Workover services – Includes a variety of well completion, workover and maintenance services, including installations, completions, sidetracking of wells and support for perforating operations.

Production Services – Includes intervention services.

Intervention services – Includes services to enhance, maintain and extend oil and gas production during the life of the well, including coiled tubing, cased hole and mechanical wireline, hydraulic workover and snubbing, pressure control services, production testing and optimization.

Technical Solutions – Includes products and services that generally address customer-specific needs with their applications, which typically require specialized engineering, manufacturing or project planning expertise. Most operations requiring our technical solutions are generally in offshore environments during the completion, production and decommissioning phase of an oil and gas well. These products and services primarily include completion tools and services, well control services and subsea well intervention.

Completion tools and services – Provides products and services used during the completion phase of an offshore well to control sand and maximize oil and gas production, including sand control systems, well screens and filters, and surface-controlled sub surface safety valves.

Well control services – Resolves well control and pressure control problems through firefighting, engineering and well control training.

The Technical Solutions segment also includes revenues from oil and gas production related to our 51% ownership interest in our sole federal offshore oil and gas property (which we refer to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the oil and gas property) and related assets.

Customers

Our customers are the major and independent oil and gas companies that are active in the geographic areas in which we operate. There were no customers that exceeded 10% of our total revenues in 2019, 2018 or 2017. A reduction in sales to our existing large customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Competition

We provide products and services worldwide in highly competitive markets, with competitors comprised of both small and large companies. Our revenues and earnings can be affected by several factors, including changes in competition, fluctuations in drilling and completion activity, perceptions of future prices of oil and gas, government regulation, disruptions caused by weather and general economic conditions. We believe that the principal competitive factors are price, performance, product and service quality, safety, response time and breadth of products and services.

Potential Liabilities and Insurance

Our operations involve a high degree of operational risk and expose us to significant liabilities. An accident involving our services or equipment, or the failure of a product sold by us, could result in personal injury, loss of life, and damage to property, equipment or the environment. Litigation arising from a catastrophic occurrence, such as fire, explosion, well blowout or vessel loss, may result in substantial claims for damages.

As is customary in our industry, our contracts generally provide that we will indemnify and hold harmless our customers from any claims arising from personal injury or death of our employees, damage to or loss of our equipment, and pollution emanating from our equipment and services. Similarly, our customers generally agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from any claims arising from personal injury or death of their employees, damage to or loss of their equipment or property, and pollution caused from their equipment or the well reservoir (including uncontained oil flow from a reservoir). Nonetheless, our indemnification arrangements may not protect us in every case.

We maintain a liability insurance program that covers against certain operating hazards, including product liability, property damage and personal injury claims,these charters, as well as certain limited environmental pollution claims for damage to a third party or its property arising outcopies of contact with pollution for which weour Corporate Governance Principles, are liable, but well control costs are not covered by this program.  These policies include primary and excess umbrella liability policies with limitsavailable in the Corporate Governance section of $350 million per occurrence, including sudden and accidental pollution incidents. All of the insurance policies we purchase contain specific terms, conditions, limitations and exclusionsour website at www.superiorenergy.com and are subject to either deductibles or self-insured retention amounts for which we are responsible.  There can be no assurance that the nature and amount of insurance we maintain will be sufficient to fully protect us against all liabilities relatedavailable in print upon request to our business.

Government Regulation

Our business is significantly affected by Federal, State and local laws and other regulations. These laws and regulations relate to, among other things:

worker safety standards;

the protection of the environment;

the handling and transportation of hazardous materials; and

the mobilization of our equipment to, and operations conductedSecretary at our work sites.

Numerous permits are required for the conduct of our business and operation of our various facilities and equipment, including our underground injection wells, trucks and other heavy equipment. These permits can be revoked, modified or renewed by issuing authorities based on factors both within and outside our control.

We cannot predict the level of enforcement of existing laws and regulations or how such laws and regulations may be interpreted by enforcement agencies or court rulings in the future. We also cannot predict whether additional laws and regulations will be adopted, including changes in regulatory oversight, increase of federal, state or local taxes, increase of inspection costs, or the effect such changes may have on us, our businesses or our financial condition.

Environmental Matters

Our operations, and those of our customers, are subject to extensive laws, regulations and treaties relating to air and water quality, generation, storage and handling of hazardous materials, and emission and discharge of materials into the environment. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all regulations affecting our business. Historically, our expenditures in furtherance of our compliance with these laws, regulations and treaties have not been material, and we do not expect the cost of compliance to be material in the future.

Raw Materials

We purchase various raw materials and component parts in connection with delivering our products and services. These materials are generally, but not always, available from multiple sources and may be subject to price volatility. While we generally do not experience significant long-term shortages of these materials, we have from time to time experienced temporary shortages of particular raw materials. We are always seeking ways to ensure the availability of resources, as well as manage costs of raw materials.

Seasonality

Seasonal weather and severe weather conditions can temporarily impair our operations and reduce demand for our products and services. Examples of seasonal events that negatively affect our operations include high seas associated with cold fronts during the winter months and hurricanes during the summer months in the Gulf of Mexico, and severe cold during winter months in the U.S. land market area.

Employees

At December 31, 2019, we had approximately 5,200 employees. Approximately 6% of our employees are subject to union contracts, all of which are in international locations. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees.

Facilities

Our principal executive offices are located atSuperior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. We own or lease a large

Our Board has affirmatively determined that each member of our standing committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) has no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria applicable to audit and compensation committees) set forth in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.
The table below shows the committees on which each of our directors sits and the number of facilitiescommittee meetings held by each committee in 2019.
             
Name
 
Audit Committee
  
Compensation Committee
  
Corporate Governance
Committee
 
James M. Funk
     
M
   
M
 
Peter D. Kinnear
  
M*
      
M
 
Janiece M. Longoria
  
M  
      
C
 
Michael M. McShane
  
C*
   
M
    
W. Matt Ralls
     
C
   
M
 
             
Meetings held in 2019
  
6  
   
3
   
3
 
*Audit committee financial expert
(C)Committee chair
(M)Committee member
Audit Committee
Our Board has a standing audit committee (Audit Committee), the various areasmembers of which are Messrs. McShane and Kinnear and Ms. Longoria. The Audit Committee is comprised of three
non-employee
directors, each of whom meet the independence and financial literacy requirements under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, including the heightened NYSE independence requirements for Audit Committee members and two of whom qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Mr. McShane serves as committee chair of the Audit Committee.
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee (Compensation Committee) consists of three members of the Board of Directors, Messrs. Funk, McShane and Ralls, all of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent under the NYSE listing standards. In addition, each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a
“non-employee”
director within the meaning of Rule
16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Mr. Ralls serves as committee chair of the Compensation Committee.
Since May 2007, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer), an independent compensation consultant, to advise the Compensation Committee on matters relating to executive compensation and assist it in which we operate throughoutmaintaining and administering our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee annually requests Pearl Meyer to conduct an executive compensation review to evaluate the world.

Intellectual Property

We seek patent and trademark protections throughout the world for our technology when we deem it prudent, and we aggressively pursue protection of these rights. We believe our patents and trademarks are adequate for the conductcompensation of our business,senior executives relative to an industry peer group selected by the Compensation Committee with input from

3

the compensation consultant and that no single patent or trademark is criticalmanagement and published market survey data. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—How We Make Compensation Decisions—Compensation Consultant’s Role” herein for more information.
Our stock incentive plan permits the Compensation Committee to delegate to appropriate personnel its authority to make awards to employees other than officers and directors subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to our business. In addition, we relyCEO to a great extent onmake or alter awards under our long-term incentive (LTI) plan to participants (other than himself), subject to the technical expertise and know-howfollowing conditions:
the CEO may grant awards relating to no more than 100,000 shares of our personnelcommon stock in any fiscal year and awards relating to maintain our competitive position.

Other Information

We have our principal executive offices at 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. Our telephone number is (713) 654-2200. We also haveno more than 20,000 shares to any one participant;

the CEO may grant no more than 30,000 performance share units (PSUs) in any fiscal year and no more than 5,000 PSUs to any one participant;
the CEO may cancel, modify or waive rights under awards related to no more than 20,000 shares and 5,000 PSUs held by a website at http://www.superiorenergy.com. Copiesparticipant;
the CEO must approve the grant in writing during an open window period, with the grant date being the date of the annual, quarterlywritten approval or a future date; and current reports we file with
the CEO must report the grants, cancellations or furnishalterations to the SEC,Compensation Committee at its next meeting.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2019, none of Messrs. Funk, McShane or Ralls, who comprised the Compensation Committee, were officers or employees of the Company or any amendments to those reports, are availableof our subsidiaries or had any relationships requiring disclosure in this Amendment under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Certain Transactions,” and none of our executive officers served as a member of the Compensation Committee of another entity or as a director of another entity whose executive officers served on our website freeBoard or the Compensation Committee. No member of charge soon after such reports are filedthe Compensation Committee is a former officer of the Company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee (Corporate Governance Committee) consists of four members of the Board, Messrs. Funk, Kinnear, and Ralls and Ms. Longoria, all of whom meet the independence requirement under the NYSE listing standards. Ms. Longoria serves as committee chair of the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee conducts assessments of nominees to our Board and is charged with developing and recommending to our Board any policies, Corporate Governance Principles and the structure, leadership and membership of our Board committees, including those policies and principles related to, affecting or furnished to the SEC. The information posted onconcerning risk oversight of our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Alternatively, you may access these reports at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov/.

Board and its committees.

Code of Conduct
Our Shared Core Values at Work (Code of Conduct) applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. This Code of Conduct is publicly available on the Corporate Governance page in the About Us section of our website at http://www.superiorenergy.com.www.superiorenergy.com. Any waivers granted to directors or executive officers and any material amendment to our Code of Conduct will be posted promptly on our website and/or disclosed in a current report on Form
8-K.

Investors

Procedures for Stockholder Recommendations of Nominees to the Board of Directors
There were no material changes to the procedures described in the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors.
4

Item 11. Executive
Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) describes our executive compensation philosophy and practices. The Compensation Committee reviews recommendations by our CEO and makes the final determination regarding executive compensation.
Executive Compensation Philosophy
The Compensation Committee is responsible for designing, implementing and administering our executive compensation program. The primary objective of our program is to:
ensure that pay and performance are directly linked so that executive compensation is aligned with the Company’s operating and financial performance, including its stock price performance; and
ensure that we can attract and retain talented executives with the skills, educational background, experience and personal qualities needed to successfully manage our business.
In structuring our executive compensation program, the Committee is guided by the following principles:
Compensation should be awareperformance driven and incentive compensation should comprise the largest part of an executive’s compensation package.
The largest portion of our target executive compensation (88% for our CEO and 80% for the other named executive officers (NEOs)) is comprised of LTI awards and annual incentive plan (AIP) participation levels that while we do, at various times, communicateare
at-risk,
performance-based with securities analysts, itthe ultimate value primarily determined by both our absolute and relative stock price performance.
Base salary, the only fixed element of compensation in our executive compensation program, accounts for approximately 12% of our CEO’s target compensation and approximately 20% of our other NEOs’ target compensation.
Compensation levels should be competitive in order to attract and retain talented executives.
We annually receive extensive input from our independent compensation consultant regarding the competitiveness of our pay strategy relative to the market. We have a well-defined, established process to evaluate the competitiveness of our executive compensation program.
Incentive compensation should balance short-term and long-term performance, including balancing short-term growth with long-term returns.
Our AIP rewards executives for the achievement of annual goals based on our profitability and achievement of quantitative operational metrics.
The value received by our CEO and other NEOs from LTI grants is againstaligned with our policyactual operational and financial performance, including both our absolute and relative stock price performance.
In order to selectively discloseencourage our executives to them any material non-public information or other confidential information. Accordingly, investors should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by an analyst with respectprudently manage our business without sacrificing long-term returns, the performance metrics used for our PSUs are our
3-year
relative total stockholder return (TSR) and return on assets (ROA) as compared to our past or projected performance. Topeers.
We evaluate annually with our independent compensation consultant whether the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.

program is balanced in terms of base pay and incentives, both short-term and long-term.

8

5

Compensation programs should provide an element of retention and motivate executives to stay with the Company long-term.
Executives forfeit their opportunity to earn a payout of their PSUs if they voluntarily leave the Company before the
3-year
performance cycle is complete, except in the case of retirement. Also, the use of time-vested stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) provides a strong incentive for executives to stay with the Company.
The retirement benefits provided under our Supplemental Executive Officers

Retirement Plan (SERP) increase the longer the executive remains with the Company.

Compensation programs should encourage executives to own Company stock in order to align their interests with our stockholders.
Our stock ownership guidelines require our executive officers to own shares of Company stock equivalent to a stated multiple of the executive’s base salary. The following table indicatesmultiple varies depending on the namesexecutive’s job title. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation Policies—Stock Ownership Guidelines and agesHolding Requirement” for more information.
We grant time-vested RSUs as one of our LTI grants, and we may also elect to pay up to 50% of the value of our PSUs in common stock.
Executive Summary of Our Compensation Practices
We maintain compensation practices that are aligned with sustainable corporate governance principles. Below, we highlight key elements of our compensation governance.
We pay for performance.
With the exception of salary and benefits, all of our executive compensation elements are incentive-based or tied to Company stock performance. Performance-based,
at-risk
pay constitutes 88%% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and 80% of our other NEOs target total direct compensation.
We structure each element of compensation with a specific purpose.
Our process for making compensation decisions involves a strategic review of the role and the level of each compensation element, as well as the balance of short-term and long-term incentive compensation
We have “double trigger” change of control provisions.
The change of control program for our executives provides for change of control cash severance payments only if a qualifying termination of employment occurs in connection with the change of control. In addition, double trigger change of control provisions apply to all of our executive LTI awards.
We review our equity plan share usage regularly.
On at least an annual basis, we review and evaluate our share dilution, burn rate and overhang levels of our LTI program and its impact on stockholder dilution.
We consider the views of our stockholders.
We conduct an annual
say-on-pay
advisory vote and take into account the results of that vote. We also have a stockholder engagement program and are interested in stockholder feedback regarding our executive compensation program.
We have strong anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.
We prohibit our executive officers and directors from hedging and pledging Company securities.
We have a broad-based LTI program.
We grant LTI awards broadly to
non-executive
management employees within the Company in an effort to promote stock ownership and alignment with our stockholders’ interests.
6

We have a claw back policy.
Our AIP and LTI awards reflect our claw back policy, which applies to all of our executive officers including all offices and positions held by eachprovide for the forfeiture of these awards or the return of any related gain in the past five years:

event of a financial statement restatement.

Name and Age

Offices Held and Term of Office

David D. Dunlap

(Age 58)

President and Chief Executive Officer, since February 2011

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

(Age 48)

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, since March 2018

Executive Vice President of International Services, from February 2012 to February 2018

James W. Spexarth

(Age 52)

Chief Accounting Officer, since March 2018

Vice President and Corporate Controller, from August 2013 to February 2018

A. Patrick Bernard

(Age 62)

Executive Vice President, since April 2016

Senior Executive Vice President, from July 2006 to March 2016

Brian K. Moore

(Age 63)

Executive Vice President of Corporate Services, since April 2016

Senior Executive Vice President of North America Services, from February 2012 to March 2016

William B. Masters

(Age 62)

Executive Vice President and General Counsel, since March 2008

9

We do not provide any excise tax gross-ups.
We do not provide excise tax
gross-ups
in any executive employment agreement or severance or change of control program.
We have robust stock ownership guidelines.
Our CEO is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 6x his base salary, our CFO is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 3x his base salary and our other executive officers are required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 2x their respective base salary.
We have a minimum holding requirement.
Our executive stock ownership guidelines require executives to maintain ownership of at least 50% of the net
after-tax
shares they acquire pursuant to any LTI awards, unless they have met the required ownership level.
We engage an independent compensation consulting firm.
Our independent compensation consultant provides information and advice regarding compensation philosophy objectives and strategy, including trends and regulatory and governance considerations related to executive compensation. Our consultant does not provide any other advisory or consulting services to the Company.
We annually review tally sheets.
We annually review tally sheets summarizing all of the compensation elements of our executive officers.
Determining Form and Amount of Compensation
Role of Management in Setting Compensation.
Our CEO recommends the compensation of our executive officers, other than himself. Each year, the CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding salary adjustments, AIP payout multiples and LTI grants for our other executive officers. In formulating his recommendations, the CEO considers various factors, including his subjective analysis of each executive’s performance and contributions to the Company, the performance of business units under his or her direct supervision (if applicable to the particular officer), experience level, tenure in position, the average base pay level for similar positions and the Company’s overall performance. Although the Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations with respect to other executive officers, the Committee makes all final determinations regarding executive compensation, including determining our CEO’s compensation.
Compensation Consultant’s Role.
Pearl Meyer advises the Committee on executive compensation matters and assists in developing and implementing our executive compensation program. As required by SEC and NYSE rules, the Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer and concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest during fiscal year 2019. In making this determination, the Committee noted that during 2019:
Pearl Meyer provided advisory services related solely to executive and director compensation;
Fees from the Company represented less than 1% of Pearl Meyer’s total revenue;
Pearl Meyer maintains a conflicts policy to prevent a conflict of interest or any other independence issues;
None of the team assigned to the Company had any business or personal relationship with members of the Committee outside of the engagement;
None of the team assigned to the Company had any business or personal relationship with any Company executive officer outside of the engagement; and
None of the team assigned to the Company maintained any individual position in our common stock.
7

Peer Groups, Annual Benchmarking Process and Survey Data.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s DiscussionCommittee evaluates the Company’s executive compensation practices and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,financial performance by reference to two different peer groups as described below, the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-KPerformance Peer Group (Performance Peer Group) and the matters contained underCompensation Peer Group (Compensation Peer Group). The Performance Peer Group is comprised of oilfield service companies which were chosen due to similarity of services provided, operating footprint, business focus, capital structure and competitive conditions. The Compensation Peer Group is a group of companies which would be considered peers for executive talent purposes. This second group is more similar to the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginningCompany in terms of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following discussion of “risk factors” identifies the most significant risks or uncertainties that could (i) materiallysize and adversely affect our business, financial condition, resultsscope of operations, liquidity or prospects,although, due to the limited number of companies directly similar in size, we include companies that are both somewhat smaller and larger than the Company. Additionally, we have excluded certain Performance Peer Group companies from the Compensation Peer Group because of dissimilarity in pay approach and structures. The Committee annually reviews the companies comprising each peer group and revises each group as it deems appropriate after consultation with Pearl Meyer.

Our 2019 Performance Peer Group and Compensation Peer Group included the following companies:
Performance Peer Group*
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
C&J Energy Services, Ltd.
Halliburton Co.
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Key Energy Services, Inc.
Nabors Industries Ltd.
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
Oil States International, Inc.
Patterson-UTI
Energy, Inc.
RPC, Inc.
Schlumberger Ltd.
Weatherford International plc
*
Reference group for the PSUs granted in 2019
Compensation Peer Group
Baker Hughes, a GE Company
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Ensco plc
Forum Energy Technologies
Halliburton Co.
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Key Energy Services, Inc.
Nabors Industries Ltd.
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
Oceaneering International, Inc.
Oil States International, Inc.
Patterson-UTI
Energy, Inc.
RPC, Inc.
Weatherford International plc 
The Compensation Peer Group set forth above had a trailing twelve-month median revenue of $2.05 billion as of December 31, 2019. We had revenue of $1.4 billion for the same period.
At the Committee’s request, Pearl Meyer conducts an annual executive compensation review to benchmark the Company’s senior executive compensation relative to the Compensation Peer Group with supplemental data from published market surveys. The Committee uses this report to evaluate whether the executive compensation levels, including base salary and actual incentive payouts, are within industry norms and the Company’s stated strategy.
Pearl Meyer supplements data from the Compensation Peer Group with broad-based compensation survey data to develop a comprehensive view of the competitive market data. We believe using survey data is an important element of our compensation evaluation. Compensation survey data includes companies from the broader energy industry that influence the competitive market for executive talent. In addition, the survey data also includes data from companies that are comparable to us in terms of size and scale.
Review of Tally Sheets
. We annually review and evaluate an executive tally sheet that contains a listing and quantification (as appropriate) of each component of our executive compensation program for our executive officers, including special executive benefits and perquisites, as well as the market valueaccumulated values (e.g., stock option holdings) and other contingent compensation such as severance arrangements. We believe that our balance of annual and long-term compensation elements, our mix of long-term incentive vehicles and our stock ownership guidelines result in a
8

compensation program that aligns our executives’ interests with those of our securities, or (ii) causestockholders and does not encourage our actual resultsmanagement to differ materially fromtake unreasonable risks relating to our anticipated results or other expectations. These risksbusiness. The various components of our executive compensation program are notdescribed in detail below.
Components of Executive Compensation
The main components of our executive compensation program are base salary, AIP and LTI grants. Our executives also participate in our SERP. Overall, the only risks that we face. Our business operations could also be affected by additional factors that applyprimary emphasis of our executive compensation program is to all companies operatingprovide a high level of variable
at-risk
performance-based compensation, linking executive pay with our operational and financial performance, including our stock price performance. As an executive’s level of responsibility increases, a greater portion of total compensation is
at-risk,
creating the potential for greater variability in the U.S.individual’s compensation from year to year.
As reflected in the charts set forth above, our CEO’s component mix is very heavily weighted towards long-term performance and globally, as well asreflects our view that his role in setting the Company’s strategic direction gives him greater influence on the ultimate performance levels achieved. We also believe that our emphasis on variable pay and balancing short-term and long-term performance is appropriate for a company competing in a highly competitive and cyclical industry.
Base Salary
The primary role of the base salary element of our executive compensation program is to compensate executives for the experience, education, personal qualities and other risksqualifications that are not presently knownkey for their specific role within the Company. In establishing the base salaries for our executives, we have historically targeted the median salaries of similarly-situated executives in our Company’s Compensation Peer Group and strive to usset base salaries at consistent levels for positions with similar responsibilities.
AIP
The purpose of the AIP is to reward executives for achievement of annual financial and operational objectives. Although the Committee sets annual incentive target levels that result in median payouts when performance objectives are met, our program provides executives with the opportunity to earn higher payments depending on the extent to which these performance objectives are achieved or that we currently considerexceeded.
AIP Parameters for 2019
Under the AIP, our NEOs are eligible to be immaterialearn a payout based on a target percentage of their base salary. We believed it was important, both for morale and competitive reasons, to incentivize performance by maintaining the same 2018 potential AIP payout target opportunity for our operations. These risks include:

Our business depends on conditionsCEO and for our other NEOs. Given the decline in activity in the oil and gas industry, especially oilwe also established what we believed was an aggressive EBITDA target of $300 million. We believed that this challenging performance goal would help achieve the balance we seek between stockholder returns and natural gas pricesexecutive compensation.

Our AIP is designed to focus management’s attention on key financial and capital expenditures by oil and gas companies.

Our business dependsoperational metrics that drive our performance, which are weighted as follows:

75% of the total payout is based on the levelachievement of oilthe foregoing EBITDA target and natural gas exploration, development25% of the total payout is based on the Committee’s assessment of our achievement of key quantitative operational metrics. The overall incentive payout ranges from 0% to 200% of each NEO’s target award opportunity based on these factors, and production activity by oil and gas companies worldwide.  The level of exploration, development and production activity is directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas prices, which historically have been volatile and difficult to predict.  Oil and natural gas prices are subject to large fluctuations in responsebeing reduced by up to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, economic growth trends, market uncertainty and a variety of other factors beyond our control.  Lower oil and natural gas prices generally lead to decreased spending by our customers. While higher oil and natural gas prices generally lead to increased spending by our customers, sustained high energy prices can also be an impediment to economic growth and can therefore negatively impact spending by our customers. Our customers may also take into account the volatility of energy prices and other risk factors by requiring higher returns for individual projects if there is higher perceived risk. Any of these factors could significantly affect the demand for oil and natural gas, which could affect the level of capital spending by our customers and in turn could have a material effect on our results of operations.

The availability of quality drilling prospects, exploration success, relative production costs, expectations about future oil and natural gas demand and prices, the stage of reservoir development, the availability of financing, and political and regulatory environments are also expected to affect levels of exploration, development, and production activity, which would impact the demand for our services.  Any prolonged reduction of oil and natural gas prices, as well as anticipated declines, could also result in lower levels of exploration, development, and production activity.

The demand for our services may be affected by numerous factors, including the following:

the cost of exploring for, producing and delivering oil and natural gas;

demand for energy, which is affected by worldwide economic activity, population growth and market expectations regarding future trends;

the ability of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other key oil-producing countries to set and maintain production levels for oil;

the level of excess production capacity;

the discovery rate of new oil and natural gas reserves;

domestic and global political and economic uncertainty, socio-political unrest and instability, terrorism or hostilities;

weather conditions and changes in weather patterns, including summer and winter temperatures that impact demand;

the availability, proximity and capacity of transportation facilities;

oil refining capacity and shifts in end-customer preferences toward fuel efficiency;

the level and effect of trading in commodity future markets, including trading by commodity price speculators and others;

demand for and availability of alternative, competing sources of energy;

the extent to which taxes, tax credits, environmental regulations, auctions of mineral rights, drilling permits, drilling concessions, drilling moratoriums or other governmental regulations, actions or policies affect the production, cost of production, price or availability of petroleum products and alternative energy sources; and

technological advances affecting energy exploration, production and consumption.

The oil and gas industry has historically experienced periodic downturns, which have been characterized by significantly reduced demand for oilfield services and downward pressure15% based on the prices we charge.  Moreover, weakness in the oil and gas industry may adversely impact the financial positionCommittee’s evaluation of our customers, which in turn could cause themsafety performance.

Financial Metric
The Committee again determined to fail to pay amounts owed to us in a timely manner or at all.  Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

We have outstanding debt obligations that could limit our ability to fund future growth and operations and increase our exposure to risk during adverse economic conditions.

At December 31, 2019, we had $1.3 billion in outstanding debt obligations, $800.0 million of which matures in December 2021. Pursuant to the Exchange Offer, on February 24, 2020, $617.9 million of outstanding $800.0 million of 7.125% Senior Notes due 2021 were exchanged for $617.9 million of newly issued 7.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (referred to hereinuse EBITDA as the New Notes). Many factors, including factors beyond our control, may affect our abilityprimary financial metric for the 2019 AIP. As a financial metric, EBITDA is closely linked to make paymentscash flow and encourages management to focus on our outstanding indebtedness. These factors include those discussed elsewhere in these Risk Factors and those listed in the “Forward-Looking Statements” section included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Ourimproving efficiency from existing debt and associated commitments could have important adverse consequences. For example, these commitments could:

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our contractual obligations;

increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

limit our ability to refinance our debt in the future or borrow additional funds;

limit our ability to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other corporate requirements;

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry; and

place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt or less restrictive covenants in such debt.

Necessary capital financing may not be available at economic rates or at all.

Turmoil in the credit andoperations. The financial markets could adversely affect financial institutions, inhibit lending and limit our access to funding through borrowings under our credit facility or obtaining other financing in the public or private capital markets on terms we believe to be reasonable. Prevailing market conditions could be adversely affected by the ongoing disruptions in domestic or overseas sovereign or corporate debt markets, low commodity prices or other factors impacting our business, contractions or limited growth in the economy or other similar adverse economic developments in the U.S. or abroad. Instability in the global financial markets has from time to time resulted in periodic volatility in the capital markets. This volatility could limit our access to the credit markets, leading to higher borrowing costs or, in some cases, the inability to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Any such failure to obtain additional financing could jeopardize our ability to repay, refinance or reduce our debt obligations, or to meet our other financial commitments.

The price of our common stock has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate substantially.

The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile in the future.  Somemetric portion of the factors that could affect the price of our common stock are quarterly increases or decreases in revenue or earnings, changes in revenue or earnings estimates by the investment communityAIP provides for threshold, target and speculation in the press or investment community about our financial condition or results of operations.  General market conditions and U.S. or international economic factors and political events unrelated to our performance may also affect our stock price.  For these reasons, investors should not rely on recent trends in the price of our common stock to predict the future price of our common stock or our financial results.

There are operating hazards inherent in the oil and gas industry that could expose us to substantial liabilities.

Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the oil and gas industry that may lead to property damage, personal injury, death or the discharge of hazardous materials into the environment. Many of these events are outside of our control. Typically, we provide products and services at a well site where our personnel and equipment are located together with personnel and equipment of our customer and other service providers. From time to time, personnel are injured or equipment or property is damaged or destroyedmaximum payout levels, as a resultpercentage of accidents, failed equipment, faulty products or services, failuresalary, based upon the achievement of safety measures, uncontained formation pressures or other dangers inherent in oil50%, 100% and natural gas exploration, development and production. Any of these events can be the result of human error or purely accidental, and it may be difficult or impossible to definitively determine the ultimate cause200% of the event or whose personnel or equipment contributed thereto. All of these risks expose us to a wide range of significant health, safety and environmental risks and potentially substantial litigation claims for damages. With increasing frequency, our products and services are deployed in more challenging exploration, development and production locations. From time to time, customers and third parties may seek to hold us accountable for damages and costs incurred as a result of an accident, including pollution, even under circumstances where we believe we did not cause or contribute toEBITDA target. Based on the accident. Our insurance policies are subject to exclusions, limitations and other conditions, and may not protect us against liability for some types of events, including events involving a well blowout, or against losses from business interruption.  Moreover, we may not be able to maintain insurance at levels of risk coverage or policy limits that we deem adequate or on terms that we deem commercially reasonable.  Any damages or losses that are not covered by insurance, or are in excess of policy limits or subject to substantial deductibles or retentions, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 

We may not be fully indemnified against losses incurred due to catastrophic events.

As is customary in our industry, our contracts generally provide that we will indemnify and hold harmless our customers from any claims arising from personal injury or death of our employees, damage to or loss of our equipment, and pollution emanating from our equipment and services.  Similarly, our customers generally agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from any claims arising from personal injury or death of their employees, damage to or loss of their equipment or property, and pollution caused from their equipment or the well reservoir (including uncontained oil flow from a reservoir).  Our indemnification arrangements may not protect us in every case. For example, from time to time we may enter into contracts with less favorable indemnities or perform work without a contract that protects us. In addition, our indemnification rights may not fully protect us if we cannot prove that we are entitled to be indemnified or if the customer is bankrupt or insolvent, does not maintain adequate insurance or otherwise does not possess sufficient resources to indemnify us.  In addition, our indemnification rights may be held unenforceable in some jurisdictions.

Our customers’ changing views on risk allocation could cause us to accept greater risk to win new business or could result in us losing business if we are not prepared to take such risks.  To the extent that we accept such additional risk, and insure against it, our insurance premiums could rise.

From time to time, we are subject to various claims, litigation and other proceedings that could ultimately be resolved against us, requiring material future cash payments or charges, which could impair our financial condition or results of operations.

The size, nature and complexity of our business make us susceptible to various claims, both in litigation and binding arbitration proceedings. We may in the future become subject to various claims, which, if not resolved within amounts we have accrued, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Similarly, any claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively impact our reputation among our customers and the public, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future.

The credit risks of our customer base could result in losses.

Many of our customers are oil and gas companies that are facing liquidity constraints in light of the current commodity price environment. These customers impact our overall exposure to credit risk as they are also affected by prolonged changes in economic and industry conditions. If a significant number of our customers experience a prolonged business decline or disruptions, we may incur increased exposure to credit risk and bad debts.

We are subject to environmental and worker health and safety laws and regulations, which could reduce our business opportunities and revenue, and increase our costs and liabilities.

Our business is significantly affected by a wide range of environmental and worker health and safety laws and regulations in the areas in which we operate, including increasingly rigorous environmental laws and regulations governing air emissions, water discharges and waste management.  Generally, these laws and regulations have become more stringent and have sought to impose greater liability on a larger number of potentially responsible parties. The Macondo well explosion in 2010 resulted in additional regulation of our offshore operations, and similar onshore or offshore accidents in the future could result in additional increases in regulation. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including assessment of monetary penalties, imposition of remedial requirements and issuance of injunctions as to future compliance.

Environmental laws and regulations may provide for “strict liability” for remediation costs, damages to natural resources or threats to public health and safety as a result of our conduct that was lawfuloutlook at the time, it occurred or the conductCommittee set the EBITDA target for the 2019 AIP at $300 million, with the maximum being established at an unattainable level of or conditions caused by, prior owners or operators or other third parties. Strict liability can render a party liable for damages without regard$450 million.

9

Operational Metrics
With respect to negligence or fault onoperational metrics, the part of the party. Some environmental laws provide for jointCommittee established four key 2019 objectives: closely manage our general and several strict liability for remediation of spillsadministrative costs (G&A), days sales outstanding (DSO) and releases of hazardous substances.  For example, our well servicedays payable outstanding (DPO) and fluids businesses routinely involve the handling of significant amounts of waste materials, some of which are classified as hazardous substances. We also store, transport and use radioactive and explosive materials in certain of our operations. In addition, many of our current and former facilities are, or have been, used for industrial purposes. Accordingly, we could become subject to material liabilities relating to the containment and disposal of hazardous substances, oilfield waste and other waste materials, the use of radioactive materials, the use of underground injection wells, and to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as the result of exposures to, or releases of, hazardous substances. In addition, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, new domestic or foreign laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new or increased requirements could require us to incur costs or become the basis of new or increased liabilities that could reduce our earnings and ourgenerate free cash available for operations.

In addition, we and our customers may need to apply for or amend facility permits or licenses from time to timeflow. The payout levels with respect to storm water or wastewater discharges, waste handling, or air emissions relating to manufacturing activities or equipment operations, which subjects us and our customers to new or revised permitting conditions that may be onerous or costly to comply with.

Climate change legislation or regulations restricting emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas our customers produce.

Increasing concerns that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) may endanger public health and produce climate changes with significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, droughts and other climatic events, have drawn significant attention from government agencies and environmental advocacy groups. In response, additional costly requirements and restrictions have been imposed on the oil and gas industry to regulate and reduce the emission of GHGs.

Specifically, the EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) which increase operational costs by requiring the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from oil and gas production, processing, transmission and storage facilities in the United States. Although, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs, significant legislation has not yet been adopted to reduce GHG emissions at the federal level. In the absence of such federal climate legislation, a number of state and regional efforts have emerged that are aimed at tracking and/or reducing GHG emissions through the completion of GHG emissions inventories and through cap and trade programs that typically require major sources of GHG emissions to acquire and surrender emission allowances in return for emitting GHGs. Given the long-term trend towards increasing regulation, future federal GHG regulations of the oil and gas industry remain a possibility. Additionally, in December 2015, the United States joined the international community at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France that proposed an agreement requiring member countries to review and “represent a progression” in their intended nationally determined contributions, which set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. This agreement was signed by the United States in April 2016 and entered into force in November 2016. The United States is one of over 120 nations having ratified or otherwise consented to the agreement; however this agreement does not create any binding obligations for nations to limit their GHG emissions, but rather includes pledges to voluntarily limit or reduce future emissions. In June 2017, President Trump announced that the United States intended to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and to seek negotiations either to reenter the Paris Agreement on different terms or a separate agreement. In August 2017, the U.S. Department of State officially informed the United Nations of the intent of the United States to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement provides for a four-year exit process beginning when it took effect in November 2016, which would result in an effective exit date of November 2020. The United States’ adherence to the exit process and/or the terms on which the United States may re-enter the Paris Agreement or a separately negotiated agreement are unclear at this time.

In addition to governmental regulations, our customers are also requiring additional equipment upgrades to address the growing concerns of GHG emission and climate change which result in higher operational costs for service providers such as us. Despite taking additional

measures to reduce GHG emissions, there is the possibility that the demand for fossil fuels may nevertheless decrease due to such concerns.

At this stage, we cannot predict the impact of these or other initiatives on our or our customers operations, nor can we predict whether, or which of, other currently pending greenhouse gas emission proposals will be adopted, or what other actions may be taken by domestic or international regulatory bodies. The potential passage of climate change regulation may curtail production and demand for fossil fuels such as oil and gas in areas of the world where our customers operate and thus adversely affect future demand for our products and services, which may in turn adversely affect future results of operations.

Adverse and unusual weather conditions may affect our operations.

Our operations may be materially affected by severe weather conditions in areas where we operate.  Severe weather, such as hurricanes, high winds and seas, blizzards and extreme temperatures may cause evacuation of personnel, curtailment of services and suspension of operations, inability to deliver materials to jobsites in accordance with contract schedules, loss of or damage to equipment and facilities and reduced productivity.  In addition, variations from normal weather patterns can have a significant impact on demand for oil and natural gas, thereby reducing demand for our services and equipment.

Our inability to retain key employees and skilled workers could adversely affect our operations.

Our performance could be adversely affected if we are unable to retain certain key employees and skilled technical personnel.  Our ability to continue to expand the scope of our services and products depends in part on our ability to increase the size of our skilled labor force.  The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees or the inability to employ or retain skilled technical personnel could adversely affect our operating results.  In the past, the demand for skilled personnel has been high and the supply limited.  We have experienced increases in labor costs in recent years and may continue to do so in the future. 

Our international operations and revenue are affected by political, economic and other uncertainties worldwide.

In 2019, we conducted business in more than 50 countries. Our international operations are subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the foreign jurisdictions in which we provide services. Local laws and regulations, and their interpretation and enforcement, differ significantly among those jurisdictions, and can change significantly over time. Future regulatory, judicial and legislative changes or interpretations may have a material adverse effect on our ability to deliver services within various foreign jurisdictions.

In addition to these international regulatory risks, our international operations are subject to a number of other risks inherent in any business operating in foreign countries, including, but not limited to, the following:

political, social and economic instability;

potential expropriation, seizure or nationalization of assets;

inflation;

deprivation of contract rights;

increased operating costs;

inability to collect receivables and longer receipt of payment cycles;

civil unrest and protests, strikes, acts of terrorism, war or other armed conflict;

import-export quotas or restrictions, including tariffs and the risk of fines or penalties assessed for violations;

confiscatory taxation or other adverse tax policies;

currency exchange controls;

currency exchange rate fluctuations, devaluations and conversion restrictions;

potential submission of disputes to the jurisdiction of a foreign court or arbitration panel;

pandemics or epidemics that disrupt our ability to transport personnel or equipment;

embargoes or other restrictive governmental actions that could limit our ability to operate in foreign countries;

additional U.S. and other regulation of non-domestic operations, including regulation under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the FCPA) as well as other anti-corruption laws;

restrictions on the repatriation of funds;

limitations in the availability, amount or terms of insurance coverage;

the risk that our international customers may have reduced access to credit because of higher interest rates, reduced bank lending or a deterioration in our customers’ or their lenders’ financial condition;

the burden of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws and regulations;

the imposition of unanticipated or increased environmental and safety regulations or other forms of public or governmental regulation that increase our operating expenses;

complications associated with installing, operating and repairing equipment in remote locations;

the geographic, time zone, language and cultural differences among personnel in different areas of the world; and

challenges in staffing and managing international operations.

These and the other risks outlined above could cause us to curtail or terminate operations, result in the loss of personnel or assets, disrupt financial and commercial markets and generate greater political and economic instability in some of the geographic areas in which we operate. International areas where we operate that have significant risk include the Middle East, Indonesia, Nigeria and Angola.

Laws, regulations or practices in foreign countries could materially restrict our operations or expose us to additional risks.

In many countries around the world where we do business, all or a significant portion of the decision making regarding procuring our servicesAIP is determined based on below target, at target and products is controlledabove target achievements.

Safety Component
As in prior years, the Committee could reduce the ultimate payout to each executive by state-owned oil companies. State-owned oil companies or prevailing laws may (i) require usup to meet local content or hiring requirements or other local standards, (ii) restrict with whom we can contract or (iii) otherwise limit15% based on its assessment of the scopeCompany’s performance relative to various safety metrics and a grading system that makes up the executive team safety scorecard. The 2019 safety scorecard contained three results-oriented metrics that measure the number of operationssafety incidents and five leading indicators that we can legally or practically conduct. Our inability or failurewere designed to meet these requirements, standards or restrictions may adversely impact our operations in those countries. In addition, our ability to work with state-owned oil companies is subject to our ability to negotiate and agree upon acceptable contract terms, and to enforce those terms. In addition, many state-owned oil companies may require integrated contracts or turnkey contracts that could require us to provide services outside our core businesses. Providing services on an integrated or turnkey basis generally requires us to assume additional risks.

Moreover,encourage behavior by the Company’s employees in order to effectively compete in certain foreign jurisdictions, it is frequently necessary or required to establish joint ventures or strategic alliances with local contractors, partners or agents.  In certain instances, these local contractors, partners or agents may have interests that are not always aligned with ours.  Reliance on local contractors, partners or agents could expose us todecrease the risk of being unable to control the scope or quality of our overseas services or products, or being held liable under the FCPA, or other anti-corruption laws for actions taken by our strategic or local contractors, partners or agents even though these contractors, partners or agents may not themselves be subject to the FCPA or other applicable anti-corruption laws.  Any determination that we have violated the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, reputation or prospects.

Changes in tax laws or tax rates, adverse positions taken by taxing authorities and tax audits could impact our operating results.

We are subject to the jurisdiction of a significant number of domestic and foreign taxing authorities. Changes in tax laws or tax rates,safety incidents.

The possible total award payout levels for 2019, stated as a percentage of the resolution of tax assessments or audits by various tax authorities could impact our operating results. In addition, we may periodically restructure our legal entity organization. If taxing authorities were to disagree with our tax positions in connection with any such restructurings, our effective income tax rate could be impacted. The final determination of our income tax liabilities involves the interpretation of local tax laws, tax treaties and related authorities in each taxing jurisdiction, as well as the significant use of estimates and assumptions regarding future operations and results and the timing of income and expenses. We may be audited and receive tax assessments from taxing authorities that may result in assessment of additional taxes thatofficer’s base salary, are ultimately resolved with the authorities or through the courts. We believe these assessments may occasionally be based on erroneous and even arbitrary interpretations of local tax law. Resolution of any tax matter involves uncertainties and there are no assurances that the outcomes will be favorable. If U.S. or

other foreign tax authorities change applicable tax laws, our overall taxes could increase, and our business, financial condition or results of operating may be adversely impacted.

If we are not able to design, develop, and produce commercially competitive products and to implement commercially competitive services in a timely manner in response to changesset forth in the market, customer requirements, competitive pressures, and technology trends, our business and resultstable below.

             
Named Executive Officer
 
Minimum
  
Target
  
Maximum
 
Mr. Dunlap
  
75
%  
150
%  
300
%
Mr. Ballard
  
50
%  
100
%  
200
%
Mr. Moore
  
47.5
%  
95
%  
190
%
Mr. Bernard
  
45
%  
90
%  
180
%
Mr. Masters
  
45
%  
90
%  
180
%
Determination of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

2019 Results

The market for oilfield services in which we operate is highly competitive and includes numerous small companies capable of competing effectively in our markets on a local basis, as well as several large companies that possess substantially greater financial resources than we do. Contracts are traditionally awarded onCompensation Committee reviewed the basis of competitive bids or direct negotiations with customers.

The market for our services and products is characterized by continual technological developments to provide better and more reliable performance and services. If we are not able to design, develop, and produce commercially competitive products and to implement commercially competitive services in a timely manner in response to changes in the market, customer requirements, competitive pressures, and technology trends, our business and consolidated results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Likewise, if our proprietary technologies, equipment, facilities, or work processes become obsolete, we may no longer be competitive, and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.  In addition, we may be disadvantaged competitively and financially by a significant movement of exploration and production operations to areas of the world in which we are not currently active.

We are affected by global economic factors and political events.

OurCompany’s financial results depend on demand for our services2019 and products in the U.S. and the international markets in which we operate. Declining economic conditions, or negative perceptions about economic conditions, could result in a substantial decrease in demand for our services and products. World political events could also result in further U.S. military actions, terrorist attacks and related unrest.  Military action by the U.S. or other nations could escalate and further acts of terrorism may occur in the U.S. or elsewhere. Such acts of terrorism could lead to, among other things, a loss of our investment in the country, impairment of the safety of our employees, extortion or kidnapping, and impairment of our ability to conduct our operations. Such developments have caused instability in the world’s financial and insurance markets in the past, and many experts believe that a confluence of worldwide factors could result in a prolonged period of economic uncertainty and slow growth in the future.  In addition, any of these developments could lead to increased volatility in prices for oil and gas and could affect the markets for our products and services. Insurance premiums could also increase and coverages may be unavailable.

Uncertain economic conditions and instability make it particularly difficult for us to forecast demand trends. The timing and extent of any changes to currently prevailing market conditions is uncertain and may affect demand for many of our services and products. Consequently, we may not be able to accurately predict future economic conditions or the effect of such conditions on demand for our services and products and our results of operations or financial condition.

Our operations may be subject to cyber-attacks that could have an adverse effect on our business operations.

Like most companies, we rely heavily on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, to manage or support a variety of our business operations, and to maintain various records, which may include information regarding our customers, employees or other third parties, and the integrity of these systems are essential for us to conduct our business and operations.  We make significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of information and systems (and maintain contingency plans in the event of security breaches or system disruptions). However, we cannot provide assurance that our securityevaluated management’s efforts and measures will prevent security threats from materializing, unauthorized access to our systems, loss or destruction of data, account takeovers, or other forms of cyber-attacks or similar events, whether caused by mechanical failures, human error, fraud, malice, sabotage or otherwise. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data. The frequency, scope and sophistication of cyber-attacks continue to grow, which increases the possibility that our security measures will be unable to prevent our systems’ improper functioning or the improper disclosure of proprietary information. Any failure of our information or communication systems, whether caused by attacks, mechanical failures, natural disasters or otherwise, could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, or subject us to claims, any of which could materially adversely affect us.

We depend on particular suppliers and are vulnerable to product shortages and price increases.

Some of the materials that we use are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on these suppliers involves several risks, including price increases, inferior quality and a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply in a timely manner. We do not have long-term contracts with most of these sources, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these sources could have a negative impact on our results of operations and could damage our customer relationships. Further, a significant increase in the price of one or more of these materials could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Estimates of our potential liabilities relating to our oil and natural gas property may be incorrect.

Actual abandonment expenses may vary substantially from those estimated by us and any significant variance in these assumptions could materially affect the estimated liability recorded in our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, the risk exists we may underestimate the cost of plugging wells and abandoning production facilities. If costs of abandonment are materially greater than our estimates, this could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Potential changes of Bureau of Ocean Energy Management security and bonding requirements for offshore platforms could impact our operating cash flows and results of operations.

Federal oil and natural gas leases contain standard terms and require compliance with detailed Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and BOEM regulations and orders issued pursuant to various federal laws, including the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. In 2016 BOEM undertook a review of its historical policies and procedures for determining a lessee’s ability to decommission platforms on the Outer Continental Shelf and whether lessees should furnish additional security, and in July 2016, BOEM issued a new Notice to Lessees requiring additional security for decommissioning activities. In January 2017, BOEM extended the implementation timeline for properties with co-lessees by an additional six months, and in June 2017 announced that the Notice to Lessees would be stayed while BOEM continued to review its implementation issues and continued industry engagement to gather additional information on the financial assurance program. We cannot predict whether these laws and regulations may change in the future, particularly in connection with the transition of presidential administrations.

During the second half of 2016, BSEE increased its estimates of many offshore operator’s decommissioning costs, including the decommissioning costs at our sole federal offshore oil and gas property, in which our subsidiary owns a 51% non-operating interest. In October 2016, BOEM sent an initial proposal letter to the operator of the oil and gas property, proposing an increase in the supplemental bonding requirement for the property’s sole fixed platform that was eight to ten times higher than the revised supplemental bonding requirement requested for any other deep-water fixed platform in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Both the operator and our subsidiary submitted formal dispute notices, asserting that the estimates in the October 2016 proposal letter may be based on erroneous or arbitrary estimates of the potential decommissioning costs, and requesting in-person meetings to discuss the estimate. We asked that BSEE and BOEM reduce the estimate to an amount that more closely approximates actual decommissioning costs, consistent with estimates identified by BSEE and BOEM for similar deep-water platforms. BSEE and BOEM have not yet responded to our dispute notice. If BOEM ultimately issues a formal order and we are unable to obtain the additional required bonds or assurances, BOEM may suspend or cancel operations at the oil and gas property or otherwise impose monetary penalties. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating cash flows and liquidity.

Risks Relating to the Combination

There can be no assurances when or if the Combination will be completed.

Although we expect to complete the Combination in the second quarter of 2020, there can be no assurances as to the exact timing of completion of the Combination or that the Combination will be completed at all. The completion of the Combination is subject to customary approvals and conditions, many of which are outside of our control, including, among others, (i) the consummation of the Combination Exchange, (ii) entrance into an asset-based loan facility by Newco, (iii) the absence of a material adverse effect on the Superior Energy U.S. Business or Forbes, (iv) the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the parties to the Merger Agreement in all material respects, (v) material compliance by the parties with their respective covenants and agreements under the Merger Agreement and (vi) amending our existing credit facility.

There can be no assurance that the conditions required to complete the Combination will be satisfied or waived on the anticipated schedule, or at all. If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we may be obligated to pay Forbes a termination fee.

If the Combination does not close, we will not benefit from the expenses incurred in connection therewith.

The Combination may not be completed. If the Combination is not completed, we will have incurred substantial expenses for which no ultimate benefit will have been received. We have incurred out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the Combination for investment

banking, legal and accounting fees and financial printing and other costs and expenses, much of which will be incurred even if the Combination is not completed.

Termination of the Merger Agreement or failure to otherwise complete the Combination could negatively impact our business and financial results.

Termination of the Merger Agreement or any failure to otherwise complete the Combination may result in various consequences, including the following:

our business may have been adversely impacted by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Combination, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the Combination.

our management has and will continue to expend a significant amount of capital and time and resources on the Combination, and a failure to consummate the Combination as currently contemplated could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations;

the market price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the market price prior to the closing of the Combination reflects a market assumption that the Combination will be completed;

we may be required, under certain circumstances, to pay Forbes a termination fee of up to $5.0 million under the Merger Agreement, which could adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity; and

negative reactions from the financial markets may occur if the anticipated return on our investment in Newco is not realized.

If the Combination is not consummated, we cannot assure our stockholders that the risks described above will not negatively impact our business or financial results.

We are subject to business uncertaintiesaccomplishments with respect to the operationkey operational objectives. As for the financial metric, the Company achieved approximately 81.9% of the Superior Energy U.S. Business untilEBITDA target. The key operational objectives focused on growing the Combination closes.

In connection with the pendency of the Combination, it is possible that some customers, suppliersCompany’s cash balance, reducing its capital expenditures and other persons with whom we have a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us, as the case may be, as a result of the Combination, which could negatively affect our revenues, earnings and cash flows, as well as the market price of our common stock, regardless of whether the Combination is completed. Such risks may be exacerbated by delays or other adverse developments with respect to the completion of the Combination.

Furthermore, the historical financial information we have included in this Form 10-K has been derived from our consolidated financial statements and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations and cash flows would have been as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented if the Combination had been consummated.

Uncertainties associated with the Combination may distract management personnel and other key employees and divert their attention away from growing our business, which could adversely affect our future business and operations.

We are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of our officers and other key employees to execute our business plans. In connection with the Combination, it is expected that some of our executive officers will resign from their roles within our business to become executive officers of Newco. Prior to completion of the Combination, as a result of our expected management changes, our current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their roles following the completion of the Combination, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract or retain key management and other key personnel.

Furthermore, in connection with the Combination, we will enter into various agreements, including a separation agreement and transition services agreement with Newco, to effect the separation of the Superior Energy U.S. Business from our other businesses and provide a framework for our relationship with Newco after the Combination. The performance of these agreements following the closing of the Combination will require significant amounts of our management’s time and effort, which may divert management’s attention from operating and growing our remaining business.

Potential litigation against us or Forbes could result in an injunction preventing the completion of the Combination or a judgment resulting in the payment of damages.

divesting
non-core

Stockholders of our company and/or Forbes may file lawsuits against us or Forbes, respectively, and/or the directors and officers of such companies in connection with the Combination. As of the date of this filing, there have been no such lawsuits filed against either Forbes or us. However, if filed in the future, these lawsuits could prevent or delay the completion of the Combination and result in significant costs to us, including any costs associated with the indemnification of directors and officers. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or claim against us that remains unresolved at the time the Combination is completed may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Some of our executive officers have interests in the Combination that are different from the interests of our stockholders generally.

Some of our executive officers have interests in the Combination that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. These interests may include their expected designation as directors and/or executive officers of Newco following the completion of the Combination.

If the Combination is completed, we may not achieve the anticipated return on our investment in Newco.

The success of our investment in Newco as a result of the Combination will depend, in part, on Newco’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the Superior Energy U.S. Business and Forbes’ business. There can be no assurance that the Superior Energy U.S. Business and Forbes will be able to successfully integrate, which may negatively impact our investment in Newco. Difficulties in integrating the Superior Energy U.S. Business and Forbes may result in Newco performing differently than expected, in operational challenges, or in the failure to realize anticipated expense-related efficiencies that may have a negative impact on our investment in Newco.

Furthermore, we may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits expected from the Combination. Following the Combination, our business will be less diversified than our business prior to the Combination and the actions required to separate the Superior Energy U.S. Business from the remaining businesses, including an internal restructuring to effectuate the Combination, could disrupt our operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Information on properties is contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in various legal actions incidental to our business. The outcome of these proceedings is not predictable. However, based on current circumstances, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, after considering available defenses and any insurance coverage or indemnification rights, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SPN.” At February 25, 2020, there were 15,798,428 shares of our common stock outstanding, which were held by 26 record holders.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for the five years ended December 31, 2019 with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the S&P 500 Index) and our Self-Determined Peer Group, as described below, for the same period. The information in the graph is based on the assumption of a $100 investment on January 1, 2015. The comparisons in the graph are required by the SEC and are not intended to be a forecast or indicative of possible future performance of our common stock. The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

Picture 1

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Superior Energy Services, Inc.

$

68

$

86

$

49

$

17

$

3

S&P 500 Index

$

101

$

114

$

138

$

132

$

174

Peer Group

$

68

$

103

$

89

$

42

$

42

NOTES:

The lines represent monthly index levels derived from compounded daily returns that reflect the reinvestment of all dividends.

The indexes are reweighted daily, using the market capitalization on the previous trading day.

If the monthly interval, based on the fiscal year-end, is not a trading day, the preceding trading day is used.

The index level for all securities was set to $100.00 on December 31, 2014.

Our Self-Determined Peer Group consisted of 12 companies whose average stockholder return levels comprised part of the performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors under grants made in 2019 as part of our long-term incentive compensation program: Basic Energy Services, Inc., C&J Energy Services, Ltd., Halliburton Company, Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., Key Energy Services, Inc., Nabors Industries Ltd., Nine Energy Services, Inc., Oil States International, Inc., Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., RPC, Inc., Schlumberger N.V. and Weatherford International plc.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Information required by this item with respect to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is incorporated by reference from Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report Form 10-K, which will be contained in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.

Common Stock Repurchases

The following table provides information about shares of our common stock repurchased during each month for the three months ended December 31, 2019.

Period

(a)
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased

(b)
Average Price Paid per Share

(c)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)

(d)
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs (1)

October 1 - 31, 2019

972,412

$               4.36

972,412

$

10,709,806

November 1 - 30, 2019

-

$                    -

-

$

-

December 1 - 31, 2019

-

$                    -

-

$

-

Total

972,412

$               4.36

972,412

$

10,709,806

(1) On October 1, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $15.0 million of our common stock, which will expire on March 31, 2020.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with both “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to understand factors which may affect the comparability of the Selected Financial Data.

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

(in thousands, except per share data)

Revenues

$

1,425,369

$

1,478,857

$

1,305,529

$

1,200,977

$

2,360,466

Income (loss) from operations

18,417

(369,251)

(207,123)

(836,908)

(1,556,321)

Net loss from continuing operations

(77,753)

(427,403)

(180,315)

(684,834)

(1,430,290)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

(177,968)

(430,712)

(25,606)

(202,065)

(424,428)

Net loss

(255,721)

(858,115)

(205,921)

(886,899)

(1,854,718)

Net loss from continuing operations per share:

Basic and diluted

$

(5.05)

$

(27.69)

$

(11.79)

$

(45.19)

$

(95.06)

Net loss from discontinued operations per share:

Basic and diluted

(11.56)

(27.90)

(1.68)

(13.33)

(28.21)

Net loss per share:

Basic and diluted

(16.61)

(55.59)

(13.47)

(58.52)

(123.27)

Cash dividends declared per share

-

-

-

0.08

0.32

Cash

$

272,624

$

158,050

$

172,000

$

187,591

$

564,017

Working capital

663,882

410,128

385,622

437,017

846,549

Total assets

1,993,230

2,215,962

3,110,225

3,470,255

4,914,244

Long-term debt, net

1,286,629

1,282,921

1,279,771

1,284,600

1,588,263

Decommissioning liabilities, less current portion

132,632

126,558

103,136

101,513

98,890

Stockholders' equity

49,573

290,739

1,132,429

1,303,920

2,210,812

For 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 net loss from continuing operations included $17.2 million, $322.7 million, $10.4 million, $436.0 million and $1,391.5 million, respectively, of reduction in value of assets.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and applicable notes to our consolidated financial statements and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, our actual results may differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Summary

General

We provide a wide variety of services and products to the energy industry. We serve major, national and independent oil and natural gas exploration and production companies around the world and we offer products and services with respect to the various phases of a well’s economic life cycle. We currently report our operating results in four business segments: Drilling Products and Services; Onshore Completion and Workover Services; Production Services; and Technical Solutions. Given our long-term strategy of geographic expansion, we also provide supplemental segment revenue information in three geographic areas: U.S. land; U.S. offshore; and International.

Recent Developments

Combination

On December 18, 2019, we entered into the Merger Agreement to divest the Superior Energy U.S. Business and combine it with Forbes’ complimentary service lines to create a new, publicly traded consolidation platform for U.S. completion, production and water solutions.

Following the completion of the Combination, which is expected to close in the second quarter of 2020, we will remain a globally diversified oilfield services company built around the following key product and service lines: premium drill pipe, bottom hole assemblies, completion tools and products, hydraulic workover, snubbing and production services and well control services.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Superior Energy U.S. Business and Forbes will be merged into Newco. At the closing of the Combination, we will receive 49.9% of the issued and outstanding voting Class A Stock of Newco and 100% of the issued and outstanding non-voting Class B Stock of Newco, which will collectively represent an approximate 65% economic interest in Newco. Our and Forbes’ economic interest in Newco are subject to adjustment within certain parameters based on Forbes’ net debt position calculated at closing pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In addition, certain lenders under the Forbes Term Loan will exchange their portion of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Forbes Term Loan for approximately $30.0 million in Preferred Shares, which will be entitled to cash dividends at a rate of 5% per annum, payable semi-annually, and, on the third anniversary of the closing of the Combination will be subject to mandatory conversion into shares of Newco’s Class A Stock. After giving effect to such conversion, we would own an approximate 52% economic interest and Forbes’ existing stockholders would own an approximate 48% economic interest in Newco.

The Combination has been unanimously approved by our and Forbes’ Boards of Directors as well as the special committee of the Board of Directors of Forbes. Newco filed a proxy statement/prospectus on February 12, 2020, pursuant to which Forbes will solicit proxies of its stockholders to approve the Combination at a special meeting of stockholders. However, certain stockholders of Forbes who will collectively own a majority of Forbes’ common stock on the record date for the Forbes special meeting have committed to vote the shares they beneficially own in favor of the Combination and have the ability to approve the Combination without the vote of any other stockholder of Forbes.

Related Financing Transactions

As a condition of the Combination, SESI, our wholly owned subsidiary, consummated the Exchange Offer of SESI’s previously outstanding $800.0 million aggregate principal amount of Original Notes for up to $635.0 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes and conducted the Consent Solicitation to amend the liens covenant in the Original Notes Indenture to permit the Proposed Amendment upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in SESI’s Offering Memorandum. A supplemental indenture by and among SESI, the guarantors party thereto and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Proposed Amendment was executed on February 14, 2020. The Original Notes outstanding after the Exchange Offer are governed by the Original Notes Indenture, as amended by the Proposed Amendment, provided that the Proposed Amendment will only become operative immediately prior to the occurrence of the Combination.

The Exchange Offer expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 21, 2020, and $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding Original Notes were validly tendered for exchange and not withdrawn, representing 77.24% of the aggregate principal

amount of Original Notes outstanding upon commencement of the Exchange Offer. SESI accepted all validly tendered Original Notes and issued $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes pursuant to the New Notes Indenture.

Substantially concurrently with the consummation of the Combination, eligible note holders will receive, in exchange for $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes, on a pro rata basis: (1) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of Newco Secured Notes, (2) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of the Superior Secured Notes, (3) $131.3 million in cash and (4) $6.35 million in cash constituting the total consent payment. The indentures governing the Newco Secured Notes and the Superior Secured Notes will each contain restrictive covenants customary for issuances of high-yield secured notes of this type. On February 20, 2020, we entered into the Amendment which amends certain covenants, among other things, to account for the amended terms of the Exchange Offer.

Exit and Discontinuation of the Hydraulic Fracturing Service Line

On December 10, 2019, our indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, Pumpco, completed its existing hydraulic fracturing field operations and determined to discontinue, wind down and exit its hydraulic fracturing operations. We intend to maintain an adequate number of employees to efficiently wind down Pumpco’s business and divest assets over time. The financial results of Pumpco’s operations have historically been included in our Onshore Completions and Workover Services segment. Pumpco’s business is reflected as discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and its assets are in the process of being divested. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of discontinued operations. Discontinuing hydraulic fracturing aligns with our strategic objective to divest assets and service lines that do not compete for investment in the current market environment. Net proceeds from the divestiture of Pumpco’s assets will be used to reduce debt.

Reverse Stock Split

At a special meeting of stockholders held on December 18, 2019, our stockholders voted to approve a proposal authorizing our Board of Directors to effect the Reverse Stock Split and to proportionately reduce the number of our authorized shares of common stock. Following the special meeting of stockholders, our Board of Directors approved a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split.

As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, each 10 pre-split shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split automatically were converted to one issued and outstanding share of common stock without any action on the part of our stockholders. No fractional shares of common stock were issued as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, any stockholder who would have been entitled to a fractional share received a cash paymentmanagement’s efforts in lieu of such fractional shares. The total number of shares of common stock that we are authorized to issue has also been reduced by the same ratio.

Resumption of Trading on the NYSE

On September 26, 2019, the NYSE suspended trading of our common stock and commenced delisting proceedings due to our “abnormally low” stock price. Following the NYSE’s suspension of trading of our common stock, we appealed the NYSE staff’s determination. On September 27, 2019, our common stock commenced trading on the OTC Markets and, on October 4, 2019, our common stock also commenced trading on the OTCQX Best Market, operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. Subsequently, the NYSE formally withdrew the delisting determination, and, on December 26, 2019, our common stock resumed trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “SPN.”

Financial Results

During 2019, we continuedwere able to manage challenging market dynamics as a divergence of operating results in the U.S. and international markets remained prevalent. We generated $1,425.4 million of revenue in 2019, which represents a 4% decrease from $1,478.9 million of revenue generated during 2018. The decrease in revenue is largely attributable toreduce capital expenditures by 37%, increase our U.S. land market area, in which revenue decreasedcash balance by 14% during 2019.

In North America, the negative pricing pressures that began during the fourth quarter of 2018 continued to impact the demand for our completion services during 2019. The decrease in revenue generated in the U.S. land market area was primarily due to decreased revenues from our coiled tubing services, fluid management and well servicing rigs. The decrease in revenue is also attributable to the disposition of our land drilling rigs service line during the second quarter of 2019.

Revenue in our international market areas increased 13% during 2019, as72% compared to 2018 outpacing the 11% increase in international rig count. The increase in revenue generated in our international market areas was primarily driven by increased revenue from rentals of premium drill pipe and bottom hole assemblies, increased revenue from hydraulic workover and snubbing services, electric line and pressure control services. We experienced revenue growth primarily in our Asia-Pacific, Middle East and African regions. Revenue generated from the U.S. offshore market increased 4%, primarily due to increased revenues from rentals of premium drill pipe and bottom hole assemblies and increased revenue from hydraulic workover and snubbing and pressure control services.

divest
non-core

Despite the challenging year, we generated $235.4 million in adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), which represents a modest decrease of 2% from $241.3 million of adjusted EBITDA generated during 2018. In addition, during 2019, we generated $5.9 million of free cash flow, as compared to a $56.3 million free cash flow deficit generated during 2018. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below for a further discussion and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net loss from continuing operations and a reconciliation of free cash flow to cash flows from operating activities.

During 2019, we focused on growing our cash balance, reducing capital expenditures and divesting non-core assets. Our capital expenditures decreased by 37% during 2019, while our cash balance increased by 72% as of December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018. During 2019, we divested several non-core assets resulting in cash proceeds of $110.0 million.$110 million in 2019. In January of 2020, we received the remaining payment of $24.0$24 million relating to an asset sale which occurred during the fourth quarter of 2019.

During 2020, Due to the Company’s EBITDA performance compared to the target amount and the level of achievement of the key operational objectives, the Committee determined it was appropriate to approve an overall payout at 72.9% of target. In the Committee’s assessment of these operational objectives and determining the appropriate payout, we expectnoted the following achievements:

Closely Manage G&A: We targeted keeping adjusted G&A expense below $300 million in 2019. Adjusted G&A expense was actually $265.4 million in 2019, exceeding the objective by approximately 11%.
Closely Manage DSO: We targeted to limit capital spending within our operational cash flow levelsend 2019 with a DSO of 69 to generate free cash flow and allocate capital76 days with the low end of the range representing outperformance. We achieved a DSO of 79 days, slightly more than the high end of the targeted range.
Closely Manage DPO: We targeted to businessesend 2019 with higher returns on invested capital. Additionally, we intenda DPO of 50 to carefully manage our liquidity55 days. We achieved a DPO of 58 days, outperforming the high end of the targeted range by continuously monitoring cash flow and capital spending and timingapproximately 5%.
Generate Free Cash Flow: We targeted generating a range of debt retirement. We intendbetween $35 million to reduce long-term indebtedness through generation$50 million of free cash flow successful execution of the Combination outlined herein and further divestiture of non-core assets.

Industry Trends

The oil and gas industry is both cyclical and seasonal. The level of spending by oil and gas companies is highly influenced by current and expected demand as well as future prices of oil and natural gas. Changes in spending result in an increased or decreased demand for our services and products. Rig count is an indicator of the level of spending by oil and gas companies. Our financial performance is significantly affected by the rig count in the U.S. land and offshore market areas as well as oil and natural gas prices and worldwide rig count, which are summarized in the table below.

2019

2018

2019 to 2018 Change

2017

2018 to 2017 Change

Worldwide Rig Count (1)

U.S.:

Land

920

1,013

-9%

856

18%

Offshore

23

19

21%

20

-5%

Total

943

1,032

-9%

876

18%

International (2)

1,098

988

11%

948

4%

Worldwide Total

2,041

2,020

1%

1,824

11%

Commodity Prices (average)

Crude Oil (West Texas Intermediate)

$

56.98

$

65.23

-13%

$

50.80

28%

Natural Gas (Henry Hub)

$

2.57

$

3.15

-18%

$

2.99

5%

(1) Estimate of drilling activity as measured by average active drilling rigs based on Baker Hughes Co. rig count information.

(2) Excludes Canadian rig count.

Overview of our business segments

We attribute revenue to major geographic regions based on the location where services are performed or the destination of the rental or sale of products. The following table compares our revenues generated from major geographic regions (in thousands).

Revenue

2019

%

2018

%

Change

U.S. Land

$

698,305

49%

$

809,196

55%

$

(110,891)

U.S. Offshore

340,565

24%

327,874

22%

12,691

International

386,499

27%

341,787

23%

44,712

Total

$

1,425,369

100%

$

1,478,857

100%

$

(53,488)

The Drilling Products and Services segment is moderately capital intensive with higher operating margins relative to our other segments as a result of relatively low operating expenses. The largest fixed cost is depreciation as there is little labor associated with our drilling products and services businesses. In 2019, 43% of segment revenue was derived from U.S. land market area (down from 46% in 2018), while 30% of segment revenue was from the U.S. offshore market area (up from 26% in 2018) and 26% of segment revenue was from international market areas (down from 28% in 2018). Premium drill pipe accounted for more than 60% of this segment’s revenue in 2019, while bottom hole assemblies accounted for approximately 24% of this segment’s revenue in 2019.

The Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment consists primarily of services used in the completion and workover of oil and gas wells on land. These services include well service rigs and fluid management services. All of this segment’s revenue is derived in the U.S. land market areas. Demand for these services in the U.S. land market can change quickly and is highly dependent on the number of oil and natural gas wells drilled and completed. Given the cyclical nature of these drilling and completion activities in the U.S. land market, coupled with the high labor intensity of these services, operating margins can fluctuate widely depending on supply and demand at a given point in the cycle. Fluid management and well service rigs each accounted for approximately 50% of this segment’s revenue in 2019.

The Production Services segment consists of intervention services primarily used to maintain and extend oil and gas production during the life of a producing well. These services are labor intensive and margins fluctuate based on how much capital our customers allocate towards enhancing existing oil and gas production from mature wells. In 2019, 34% of segment revenue was derived from the U.S. land market area (down from 47% in 2018), while 18% of segment revenue was from the U.S. offshore market area (up from 16% in 2018) and 48% of this segment’s revenue was from international market areas (up from 37% in 2018). Coiled tubing services represented approximately 17% of this segment’s revenue in 2019. Hydraulic workover and snubbing and pressure control services each represented approximately 25% of this segment’s revenue in 2019 and electric wireline accounted for approximately 13% of this segment’s revenue in 2019.

The Technical Solutions segment consists of products and services that address customer-specific needs and include offerings such as completion tools and services, well control services, subsea well intervention and the production and sale of oil and gas. Given the project-specific nature associated with several of the service offerings in this segment and the seasonality associated with Gulf of Mexico activity, revenue and operating margins in this segment can have significant variations from quarter to quarter. In 2019, revenue derived from the U.S. land market area was 15% of segment revenue (up from 12% in 2018), while 53% of segment revenue was from the U.S. offshore market area (down from 59% in 2018) and 32% of segment revenue was from international market areas (up from 29% in 2018). Completion tools and products accounted for approximately 40% of this segment’s revenue in 2019, while well control services represented more than 30% of this segment’s revenue in 2019.

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

For 2019, our revenue was $1,425.4 million, a decrease of $53.5 million or 4%, as compared to 2018. Net loss from continuing operations was $77.8 million, or a $5.05 loss per share. Net loss was $255.7 million, or a $16.61 loss per share. Included in the results for 2019 was a pre-tax charge of $17.2 million related to a reduction in value of assets. For 2018, our revenue was $1,478.9 million, resulting in a loss from continuing operations of $427.4 million, or a $27.69 loss per share. Net loss was $858.1 million, or a $55.59 loss per share. Included in the results for 2018 was a pre-tax charge of $322.7 million related to a reduction in value of assets.

The following table compares our operating results for 2019 and 2018 (in thousands). Cost of revenues excludes depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion for each of our business segments.

Revenue

Cost of Services and Rentals

2019

2018

Change

%

2019

%

2018

%

Change

Drilling Products and

Services

$

411,573 

$

383,719 

$

27,854 

7%

$

154,503 

38%

$

148,019 

39%

$

6,484 

Onshore Completion and

Workover Services

341,297 

406,248 

(64,951)

-16%

274,162 

80%

315,291 

78%

(41,129)

Production Services

405,830 

418,525 

(12,695)

-3%

328,527 

81%

342,420 

82%

(13,893)

Technical Solutions

266,669

270,365 

(3,696)

-1%

167,890 

63%

164,758 

61%

3,132 

Total

$

1,425,369

$

1,478,857 

$

(53,488)

-4%

$

925,082 

65%

$

970,488 

66%

$

(45,406)

Operating Segments:

Drilling Products and Services Segment

Revenue for our Drilling Products and Services segment increased 7% to $411.6 million for 2019, as compared to $383.7 million for 2018. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue decreased to 38% of segment revenue in 2019, as compared to 39% in 2018. Revenue from the U.S. offshore market area increased 24% as a result of increased revenue from rentals of premium drill pipe, bottom hole assemblies and accommodation units, as demand for these rental products increased along with the increase in offshore rig count. Revenue from the U.S. land market area and international market areas remained flat.

Onshore Completion and Workover Services Segment

Revenue for our Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment decreased 16% to $341.3 million for 2019, as compared to $406.2 million in 2018. All of this segment’s revenue is derived from the U.S. land market area, in which rig count was down 9%. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue increased to 80% of segment revenue in 2019, as compared to 78% in 2018. During 2019, we recorded a $8.2 million in reduction in value of assets as compared to $227.8 million in reduction in value of assets for goodwill and long-lived assets impairments recorded during 2018.

Production Services Segment

Revenue for our Production Services segment decreased 3% to $405.8 million for 2019, as compared to $418.5 million in 2018. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues decreased to 81% of segment revenue in 2019, as compared to 82% in 2018. Revenue from the U.S. land market area decreased 29%, primarily due to decreased activity in coiled tubing services. Revenue from international market areas increased 24% primarily due to increased activity from hydraulic workover and snubbing services, electric line and pressure control services. Revenue derived from the U.S. offshore market area increased 11%, primarily due to an increase in hydraulic workover and snubbing activities and electric line services. During 2018, we recorded $92.3 million in reduction in value of assets for goodwill and long-lived assets impairments.

Technical Solutions Segment

Revenue for our Technical Solutions segment decreased 1% to $266.7 million for 2019, as compared to $270.4 million in 2018. Cost of revenues as percentage of revenue increased to 63% in 2019, as compared to 61% in 2018. Revenue derived from the U.S. offshore market area decreased 12%, primarily due to decline in revenue from subsea intervention services. Revenue from the U.S. land market area increased 30% primarily due to an increase in demand for completion tools and products. Revenue from international market areas

increased 7%, primarily due to an increase in subsea intervention services. During 2019, we recorded $7.0 million in reduction in value of assets.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortizationand Accretion

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion decreased to $196.5 million during 2019 from $278.4 million in 2018. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for our Drilling Products and Services segment by $28.1 million, or 25%; for our Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment by $34.5 million, or 50%; for our Production Services segment by $15.6 million, or 23%; and for our Technical Solutions segment by $3.0 million, or 12%. The decrease in depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion is primarily due to assets becoming fully depreciated and impairments of long-lived assets recorded during 2019 and 2018.

Other Operating Items:

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased to $268.2 million during 2019 from $276.5 million in 2018. Total general and administrative expenses decreased 3% due to our continued focus on reducing our cost structure and an increase in gains on sales of assets.

Reduction in Value of Assets

The reduction in value of assets recorded in 2019 was $17.2 million as compared to $322.7 million in 2018. In 2019, the reduction in value of assets primarily related to impairment of our long-lived assets, primarily in our Technical Solutions and Production Services segments. In 2018, the reduction in value of assets was comprised of $251.8 million related to impairment of the remaining goodwill at our Onshore Completion and Workover Services and Production Services segments and $70.8 million impairment related to reduction in value of long-lived assets, primarily in our Onshore Completion and Workover Services and Production Services segments. See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the reduction in value of assets.

Non-operating Items:

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate for 2019 was a 6% tax benefit compared to a 9% tax benefit for 2018. The change in the effective income tax rate was primarily impacted by a deferred tax assets valuation allowance recorded during 2019.

Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $177.9 million for 2019 and represented Pumpco’s operating results. Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $430.7 million for 2018 and included operating results for both Pumpco and our subsea construction business which was wound down during 2018. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the discontinued operations.

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

For 2018, our revenue was $1,478.9 million, an increase of $173.3 million or 13%, as compared to 2017. The increase is largely attributable to an increase in land-based activity, particularly in the U.S. land market, where the average rig count increased 18% as compared to 2017. Net loss from continuing operations was $427.4 million, or $27.69 loss per share. Net loss was $858.1 million, or $55.59 loss per share. Included in the results for 2018 were pre-tax charges of $322.7 million related to the reduction in value of assets. For 2017, our revenue was $1,305.5 million, resulting in a loss from continuing operations of $180.3 million, or $11.79 loss per share. Net loss was $205.9 million, or $13.47 loss per share. Included in the results for 2017 were pre-tax charges of $10.4 million related to the reduction in value of assets.

The following table compares our operating results for 2018 and 2017 (in thousands). Cost of revenues excludes depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion for each of our business segments.

Revenue

Cost of Services and Rentals

2018

2017

Change

%

2018

%

2017

%

Change

Drilling Products and

Services

$

383,719 

$

293,690 

$

90,029 

31%

$

148,019 

39%

$

128,381 

44%

$

19,638 

Onshore Completion and

Workover Services

406,248 

366,636 

39,612 

11%

315,291 

78%

282,695 

77%

32,596 

Production Services

418,525 

372,781 

45,744 

12%

342,420 

82%

303,256 

81%

39,164 

Technical Solutions

270,365 

272,422 

(2,057)

-1%

164,758 

61%

175,477 

64%

(10,719)

Total

$

1,478,857 

$

1,305,529 

$

173,328 

13%

$

970,488 

66%

$

889,809 

68%

$

80,679 

Operating Segments:

Drilling Products and Services Segment

Revenue for our Drilling Products and Services segment increased 31% to $383.7 million for 2018, as compared to $293.7 million for 2017. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue decreased to 39% of segment revenue in 2018, as compared to 44% in 2017. Revenue from the U.S. land market area increased 50% as a result of increased revenue from rentals of premium drill pipe, bottom hole assemblies and accommodation units, as demand for these rental products increased along with the increase in U.S. land rig count. Revenue from the U.S. offshore market area and from the international market areas increased 10% and 26%, respectively, primarily due to an increase in revenue from rentals of premium drill pipe.

Onshore Completion and Workover Services Segment

Revenue for our Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment increased 11% to $406.2 million for 2018, as compared to $366.6 million in 2017. All of this segment’s revenue is derived from the U.S. land market area, in which rig count increased 18%. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue increased to 78% of segment revenue in 2018, as compared to 77% in 2017. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to an increase in activity in our fluid management and drilling rigs businesses. During 2018, we recorded $227.8 million in reduction in value of assets for goodwill and long-lived assets impairments.

Production Services Segment

Revenue for our Production Services segment increased 12% to $418.5 million for 2018, as compared to $372.8 million in 2017. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue increased to 82% of segment revenue in 2018, as compared to 81% in 2017. Revenue from the U.S. land market area increased 29%, primarily due to increased activity in coiled tubing and hydraulic workover and snubbing services. Revenue from international market areas increased 7% primarily due to increased activity from coiled tubing and hydraulic workover and snubbing services. Revenue derived from the U.S. offshore market area decreased 10%, primarily due to a decrease in hydraulic workover and snubbing activities. During 2018, we recorded $92.3 million in reduction in value of assets for goodwill and long-lived assets impairments.

Technical Solutions Segment

Revenue for our Technical Solutions segment remained flat at $270.4 million for 2018. Cost of revenues as percentage of revenue decreased to 61% in 2018, as compared to 64% in 2017. Revenue derived from the U.S. offshore market area remained unchanged from

2017. Revenue from the U.S. land market area decreased 9% and revenue from international market areas increased 3% primarily due to an increase in demand for completion tools and products. During 2017, we recorded $8.1 million in reduction in value of assets.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortizationand Accretion

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion decreased to $278.4 million during 2018 from $326.9 million in 2017. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for our Drilling Products and Services segment by $19.3 million, or 15%; for our Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment by $13.1 million, or 16%; for our Production Services segment by $12.0 million, or 15%, and for our Technical Solutions segment by $3.8 million, or 13%. The decrease in depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion is primarily due to assets becoming fully depreciated.

Other Operating Items:

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased to $276.5 million during 2018 from $285.6 million in 2017. Total general and administrative expenses decreased 3% due to our continued focus on reducing our cost structure and an increase in gains on sales of assets.

Reduction in Value of Assets

The reduction in value of assets recorded in 2018 was $322.7 million as compared to $10.4 million in 2017. In 2018, the reduction in value of assets was comprised of $251.8 million related to impairment of the remaining goodwill at our Onshore Completion and Workover Services and Production Services segments and $70.8 million impairment related to reduction in value of long-lived assets, primarily in our Onshore Completion and Workover Services and Production Services segments. In 2017, the reduction in value of assets was comprised of $8.1 million related to property, plant and equipment in the Technical Solutions segment and $2.3 million related to property, plant and equipment primarily in the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment. See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the reduction in value of assets.

Non-operating Items:

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate for 2018 was a 9% tax benefit compared to a 42% tax benefit for 2017. The change in the effective income tax rate was primarily impacted by the reduction in value of goodwill recorded during the fourth quarter of 2018, which is non-deductible for income tax purposes. Our 2017 effective income tax rate was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (U.S. Tax Reform). See note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.

Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $430.7 million for 2018 as compared to $25.6 million for 2017. Loss from discontinued operations included results for both Pumpco and subsea construction business which was sold during 2018. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the discontinued operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash flows depend, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and gas companies for exploration, development and production activities. Certain sources and uses of cash, such as our level of discretionary capital expenditures, divestitures of non-core assets, issuances and repurchases of debt and of our common stock are within our control and are adjusted as necessary based on market conditions.

Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, availability under our revolving credit facility, cash generated from operations and proceeds from divestiture of non-core assets. As of December 31, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $272.6

million and $117.5 million of availability remaining under our revolving credit facility. During 2019, we generated net cash from operating activities of $146.4 million and received $110.0 million in cash proceeds from the sale of assets.

Uses of Liquidity

Our primary uses of liquidity are to provide support for our operating activities, debt service obligations and capital expenditures. We spent $140.5 million of cash on capital expenditures during 2019. Capital expenditures of $63.3 million primarily related to the expansion and maintenance of our equipment inventory at our Drilling Products and Services segment; $42.6 million (which includes $36.7 million spent by Pumpco) primarily related to maintenance of equipment inventory at our Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment and the remaining $34.6 million of capital expenditures primarily related to the maintenance of our equipment for our Production Services and Technical Solutions segments.

During 2020, we expect to limit capital spending within our operational cash flow levels to generate free cash flow and allocate capital to businesses with higher returns on invested capital. Furthermore, in connection with the Combination, we will pay down $131.3 million of our 7.125 % senior unsecured notes due December 2021. In addition, we will pay the $6.35 million consent fee and related transaction costs using available cash on hand.

Debt Instruments

We have an asset-based revolving credit facility which matures in October 2022. The borrowing base under the credit facility is calculated based on a formula referencing the borrower’s and the subsidiary guarantors’ eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible premium rental drill pipe less reserves. Availability under the credit facility is the lesser of (i) the commitments, (ii) the borrowing base and (iii) the highest principal amount permitted to be secured under the indenture governing the 7.125% senior unsecured notes due 2021. The credit agreement contains various covenants, including, but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, permitted investments, liens on assets, making distributions, transactions with affiliates, merger, consolidations, dispositions of assets and other provisions customary in similar types of agreements. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

We have outstanding $500 million of 7.75% senior unsecured notes due September 2024. The indenture governing the 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2024 requires semi-annual interest payments on March 15 and September 15 of each year through the maturity date of September 15, 2024. The indenture contains customary events of default and requires that we satisfy various covenants. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

At December 31, 2019, we had outstanding $800 million of 7.125% senior unsecured notes due December 2021 (referred to herein as the Original Notes). In connection with the Exchange Offer, $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding Original Notes were validly tendered for exchange and not withdrawn, representing 77.24% of the aggregate principal amount of Original Notes outstanding upon commencement of the Exchange Offer. SESI accepted all validly tendered Original Notes and issued $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes pursuant to the New Notes Indenture. As a result of the Exchange Offer, as of February 24, 2020, we have outstanding $182.1 million of Original Notes and $617.9 million of New Notes. The Original Notes Indenture requires semi-annual interest payments on June 15 and December 15of each year through the maturity date of December 15, 2021.  The New Notes Indenture and the Original Notes Indenture each contain customary events of default and require that we satisfy various covenants. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants in the Original Notes Indenture.

Combination

Substantially concurrently with the consummation of the Combination, eligible note holders will receive, in exchange for $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes, on a pro rata basis: (1) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of Newco Secured Notes, (2) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of Superior Secured Notes, (3) $131.3 million in cash and (4) $6.35 million in cash constituting the total consent payment. As a result, upon consummation of the Combination, we will retire $374.6 million of the New Notes, comprised of the $131.3 cash payment and $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of the Newco Secured Notes. Subsequent to the completion of the Combination, we expect to have $0.9 billion of outstanding debt obligations, of which $182.1 million will mature in December 2021. Additionally, in connection with the Combination, we will amend our current credit facility, to among other things, reduce the total commitments thereunder from $300.0 million to $200.0 million.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments at December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

Contractual Obligations

Total

< 1 Year

1 - 3 Years

3 - 5 Years

More Than 5 Years

Long-term debt, including estimated interest
    payments

$

1,607,750

$

95,750

$

934,500

$

577,500

$

-

Decommissioning liabilities, undiscounted

198,234

3,649

3,210

7,419

183,956

Operating leases

126,101

29,796

34,981

16,943

44,381

Other long-term liabilities

135,679

1,827

52,340

12,493

69,019

Total

$

2,067,764

$

131,022

$

1,025,031

$

614,355

$

297,356

The table above reflects only contractual obligations at December 31, 2019 and excludes, among other things, (i) commitments made thereafter, (ii) options to purchase assets, (iii) contingent liabilities, (iv) capital expenditures that we plan, but are not committed, to make and (v) open purchase orders.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We define adjusted EBITDA(calculated as net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax expense (benefit) and depreciation, amortization and depletion, adjusted for reduction in value of assets and other charges, which management does not consider representative of our ongoing operations. We define free cash flow (deficit) as cash flows provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. These non-GAAP measures are not calculatedexpenditures) in accordance2019. We generated $5.9 million of free cash flow which was below the target range.

10

                 
Goal
 
% of Award
  
Target Achieved
  
Resulting Payout %
  
Target Payout %
 
EBITDA Target
  
75%
   
81.9%
   
47.9%
   
72.9%
 
Key Operational Objectives
  
25%
   
Target
   
25%
 
LTI Awards
The purpose of our LTI awards is to focus executives on the Company’s long-term performance and alignment of their compensation with or a substitute for, measures provided in accordanceboth our absolute and relative stock price performance. The 2019 LTI awards were granted by the Committee with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. These financial measures are provided to enhance investors’ overall understanding65.7% of the LTI grant value to our NEOs in the form of PSUs, 21.8% in RSUs and 12.5% in stock options. LTI grant amounts are determined by dividing the LTI grant value by the target payout of $100 per unit for PSUs, the grant date fair market value of our stock for RSUs and the ASC 718 grant date fair value for stock options.
Consistent with the Company’s currentcompensation philosophy, the Committee believes stock-based incentive awards are one of the best ways to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. In addition, the terms of the PSUs reflect the Committee’s belief that executive compensation should be tied directly to the Company’s financial and operational performance, including its stock price performance.

The PSUs provide our executives the opportunity to earn additional compensation based on the Company’s relative financial and operational performance, including its relative stock price performance.

2019 LTI Program
At-A-Glance
Component of LTI Program
Terms
How the Award Furthers our Compensation
Principles
RSUs
(21.8% of grant value)
Pays out in equivalent number of shares of our common stock
Vests in equal annual installments over a
3-year
period, subject to continued service
Widely used in the energy industry to strengthen the link between stockholder and employee interests, while motivating executives to remain with the Company
Provides a bridge between the short-term and long-term interests of stockholders, and reduces the impact of share price volatility over industry cycles
Stock Options
(12.5% of grant value)
Exercise price at fair market value on grant date
Vests in equal annual installments over
3-year
period, subject to continued service
10-year
term
Motivates executives to continue to grow the value of the Company’s stock over the long-term as the value of the stock option depends entirely on the long-term appreciation of the Company’s stock price
PSUs
(65.7% of grant value)
3-year
performance period
Vests at the end of the
3-year
performance period, subject to continued service
Target payout of $100 per unit with an actual payout range of $0 to $200 per unit based on performance compared to our Performance Peer Group
Performance criteria link the Company’s long-term performance directly to compensation received by executive officers and other key employees and encourage them to make significant contributions towards increasing ROA and, ultimately, stockholder returns
11

Performance measures:
50% Relative ROA
50% Relative TSR
Payout in cash, although up to 50% of value may be paid in shares of stock in the Committee’s discretion
Use of TSR to better align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders
2019 LTI Program Awards
The award mix for NEOs during 2019 was 65.7% in PSUs, 21.8% in RSUs and 12.5% stock options. The following table reconciles net loss from continuing operations, which isshows the directly comparable financial measure determined2019 LTI award value (denominated as a percentage of annual salary) and the approximate total value of the 2019 LTI grants (amounts reflected in accordance with GAAP,Summary Compensation Table for RSUs and stock options reflect actual grant date fair values). The amounts reflected below reflect the LTI grant values and not the actual value received by any of the NEOs.
                     
NEO
 
2019 LTI
% of
Salary
  
Total Value Granted as
PSUs
  
Total Value Granted as
RSUs
  
Total Value Granted as
Options
  
Total Value of 2019
LTI Awards
 
Mr. Dunlap
  
600
% $
3,350,700
  $
1,111,800
  $
637,500
  $
5,100,000
 
Mr. Ballard
  
360
% $
1,123,943
  $
372,937
  $
213,840
  $
1,710,720
 
Mr. Moore
  
300
% $
989,294
  $
328,259
  $
188,222
  $
1,505,775
 
Mr. Bernard
  
300
% $
701,134
  $
232,644
  $
133,397
  $
1,067,175
 
Mr. Masters
  
300
% $
855,260
  $
283,785
  $
162,721
  $
1,301,766
 
Mr. Spexarth
  
300
% $
645,700
  $
214,250
  $
122,850
  $
982,800
 
Structure of PSUs
For the PSUs granted for the 2019-2021 cycle, under both performance criteria, the maximum, target and threshold levels are met when our ROA and TSR are in the 75
th
percentile, 50
th
percentile and 25
th
percentile, respectively, as compared to adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

the ROA and TSR of the Performance Peer Group, as described in the following table:
             
Performance Level Relative to Performance Peer Group
 
Percent of
 Date-of-Grant

Value of PSU Received for
Relative ROA Level
  
Percent of
 Date-of-Grant

Value of PSU Received for
Relative TSR Level
  
Total Percent of
 Date-of-

Grant Value of PSU
Received
 
(Below 25th Percentile)
  
0
%  
0
%  
0
%
Threshold (25th Percentile)
  
25
%  
25
%  
50
%
Target (50th Percentile)
  
50
%  
50
%  
100
%
Maximum (75th Percentile or above)
  
100
%  
100
%  
200
%

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

Reported net loss from continuing operations

$

(77,753)

$

(427,403)

Reduction in value of assets

17,185

322,713

Restructuring and other related costs

6,035

9,374

Gain on legal settlement

(5,776)

-

Merger-related costs

3,095

-

Interest expense, net

98,312

99,477

Other expense

2,484

1,678

Income taxes

(4,626)

(43,003)

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

196,459

278,439

Adjusted EBITDA

$

235,415

$

241,275

The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities, which isPSUs have a three year performance period, commencing January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2021, and will time-vest on December 31, 2021, subject to continued employment through the directly comparable financial measure determined in accordance with GAAP, to free cash flow (deficit) (in thousands):

vesting date. Actual PSU performance results that fall

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

146,428

$

165,057

Less: capital expenditures

(140,465)

(221,370)

Free cash flow (deficit)

$

5,963

$

(56,313)

in-between

the “maximum,” “target” and

32

12

Critical Accounting Policies

“threshold” levels will be calculated based on a sliding scale. For purpose of determining the Company’s ROA rank in the Performance Peer Group, we generate the results using income from operations data and Estimates

The accounting policies described below are considered critical in obtaining an understanding of our consolidatednet operating asset data derived from financial statements becauseas reported by each peer company in their application requires significant estimates

year-end
annual report on Form
10-K,
uniformly adjusted for any
non-operational
charges as determined by established, independent third-party financial data providers. All calculations are validated by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
Payout of 2017-2019 PSUs
The PSUs granted for the 2017-2019 performance period were paid out in cash to the PSU recipients in April 2020. The Company ranked in the 17th percentile of relative TSR and judgmentsin the 44th percentile of relative ROA, both as compared to its performance peers, resulting in a payout to the NEOs of $50 per PSU.
The PSU payout received by management in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Management’s estimates and judgments are inherently uncertain and may differ significantly from actual results achieved. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if the following conditions apply:

the estimate requires significant assumptions; and

changes in estimate could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition; or

if different estimates that could have been selected had been used, there could be a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Iteach NEO is management’s view that the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, actual results can differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The sectionsthe table below contain information about our most critical accounting estimates.

Long-Lived Assets. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when the fair value of those assets is less than their respective carrying amount. Fair value is measured, in part, by the estimated cash flows to be generated by those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon, among other things, historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market rates, utilization levels and operating performance. Our estimates of cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in economic conditions or changes in an asset’s operating performance. Assets are generally grouped by subsidiary or division for the impairment testing, which represent the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Our estimate of fair value represents our best estimate based on industry trends and reference to market transactions and is subject to variability. The oil and gas industry is cyclical and our estimates of the period over which future cash flows will be generated, as well as the predictability of these cash flows, can have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and in periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment charges. During 2019, we recorded $17.2 million in expensethe “2019 Summary Compensation Table” under the column

“Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation.”
         
Named Executive Officer
 
Number of Units
  
Value of PSU Payout
 
Mr. Dunlap
  
25,500
  $
1,275,000
 
Mr. Ballard
  
6,000
  $
300,000
 
Mr. Moore
  
7,529
  $
376,450
 
Mr. Bernard
  
5,336
  $
266,800
 
Mr. Masters
  
6,140
  $
307,000
 
Mr. Spexarth
  
1,541
  $
77,050
 
Perquisites
We seek to maintain a cost conscious culture, and specifically in connection with the reductionbenefits and modest perquisites provided to executives. The Company provides each of our executive officers an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, and also reimburses them for business travel, as well as for all deductibles,
co-pays,
and other out of pocket expenses associated with our health insurance program through a program called ArmadaCare, and provides them with other limited perquisites. These perquisites are intended to ensure our executive officers are able to devote their full business time to the affairs of the Company. The attributed costs of the personal benefits described above for the NEOs for 2019 are included in valuethe “2019 Summary Compensation Table.” We believe the provision of long-lived assetsthese benefits was modest and appropriate in our Onshore Completion and Workover Services, Production Services and Technical Solutions segments. See note 112019.
Post–Employment Compensation
The Company also provides post-employment benefits to our consolidated financial statementsexecutive officers through our SERP, including a
non-qualified
deferred compensation plan and certain severance and change of control benefits pursuant to employment agreements that we have with our executive officers. For more information on these plans, see the sections entitled “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Retirement Benefit Programs” and “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.” For more information on the contributions, earnings and aggregate account balances for further information abouteach NEO, see the table entitled “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contribution for 2019.”
As described in more detail under “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control,” we entered into employment agreements with all of our executive officers whereby the executives are entitled to severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment under certain conditions. We have determined that it is appropriate to provide our executives with severance benefits under these impairments.

Goodwill.circumstances in light of their positions with the Company and as part of their overall compensation package. The severance benefits are generally designed to approximate the benefits each would have received had he remained employed by the Company through the remainder of the term covered by his employment agreement.

13

We performbelieve that the goodwill impairment test onoccurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change of control transaction creates uncertainty regarding the continued employment of our executive officers and distracts them from effectively performing their duties. This uncertainty results from the fact that many change of control transactions result in significant organizational changes, particularly at the senior executive level. In order to encourage our executive officers to remain employed with the Company during an annual basisimportant time when their prospects for continued employment following a transaction are often uncertain, we provide our executive officers with enhanced severance benefits under our Change of Control Severance Plan if their employment is terminated by the Company without cause or, in certain cases, by the executive for good reason in connection with a change of control (a double-trigger benefit). Because we believe that a termination by the executive for good reason may be conceptually the same as a termination by the Company without cause, and because we believe that in the context of a change of control, potential acquirers would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive’s employment to avoid paying severance, we believe it is appropriate to provide severance benefits in these circumstances. The change of control-related severance payments are made from a transaction sharing pool that is calculated as of October 1 or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level, which is consistent with our reporting segments. We assess whether any indicatorsdate of impairment exist, which requires a significant amountthe change of judgment. Such indicators may include a sustained decrease in our stock pricecontrol and market capitalization; a decline in our expected future cash flows; overall weakness in our industry; and slower growth rates.

Goodwill impairment exists whenbased on the estimated fairtransaction value of the reporting unit is belowCompany at the carrying value. In estimating the fair valuetime of the reporting units, we usechange of control (with the transaction pool increasing or decreasing as the transaction value increases or decreases, respectively). The impact of a combinationchange of an income approach andcontrol on our long-term incentive awards is governed by the applicable award agreement, which currently provide for accelerated vesting upon a market-based approach.

Income approach – We discountchange of control. The terms of the expected cash flows of each reporting unit. The discount rate used represents the estimated weighted average cost of capital, which reflects the overall level of inherent risk involved in our operations and cash flowsemployment agreements and the rateChange of return an outside investor would expect to earn.

Market-based approach – We use the guideline public company method, which focuses on comparing our risk profile and growth prospects to select reasonably similar publicly traded companies.

We weigh the income approach 80%Control Severance Plan and the market-based approach 20% duebenefits they provide are discussed more fully in the section entitled “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Executive Compensation Policies
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirement
We believe it is important that the interests of our executives and directors are aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We have adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to differences between our reporting units andexecutive officers. Under the peer companies’ size, profitability and diversityguidelines, required ownership levels are as follows:
Position
Stock Value as a Multiple
of Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer
6x
Chief Financial Officer
3x
Executive Vice President
2x
Additionally, we included a requirement that our executives maintain ownership of operations. In order to validate the reasonablenessat least 50% of the estimated fair values obtainednet
after-tax
shares of common stock acquired from the Company pursuant to any equity-based awards received from the Company, unless the executive has met his individual ownership requirement. The required share amount is determined as of the date the officer becomes subject to the guidelines, and is calculated by dividing such officer’s applicable base salary multiple by the
365-day
average closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE, and then rounding to the nearest 100 shares. The target ownership level does not change with changes in base salary or common stock price, but will change in the event the officer’s position level changes. Our executive officers are required to achieve their required ownership levels within five years from the date they become subject to the guidelines. The Committee will administer the guidelines and will periodically review each participant’s compliance (or progress towards compliance) and may impose additional requirements the Committee determines are necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this program. See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Management and Director Stock Ownership” for the reporting units, a reconciliationnumber of fair value to market capitalization is performed for each unit on a standalone basis. A control premium, derived from market transaction data, is used in this reconciliation to ensure that fair values are reasonably stated in conjunction withshares of our common stock beneficially owned by our NEOs.
Tax Implications
In structuring our executive compensation program, the Company’s capitalization. A significant amount of judgment is involved in performing these evaluations given that the results are based on estimated future events.

Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This methodCommittee takes into account the differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions. Deferredour compensation arrangements, including compensation over $1 million paid to our NEOs who are “covered employees” as

non-tax
deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)). As in prior years, in 2019 the Committee considered the tax assets and liabilities are recognized forimplications (including the future tax consequences attributablelack of deductibility) when making compensation decisions, but continued to differences betweenreserve the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expectedright to apply to taxable incomemake compensation decisions based on other factors if it determined that it was in the yearsbest interests of the Company and its stockholders to do so.
14

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We have followed FASB ASC Topic 718 in which those temporary differences are expectedaccounting for stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to be recovered or settled. Our deferred tax calculationcalculate the grant date “fair value” of their stock-based awards using a variety of assumptions. FASB ASC Topic 718 also requires uscompanies to make certain estimates about our future operations. Changesrecognize the compensation cost of their stock-based awards in state, federal and foreign tax laws, as well as changes in our financial condition or the carrying value of existing assets and liabilities, could affect these estimates. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized astheir income or expense instatements over the period that the ratean employee is enacted.

Revenue Recognition. Revenues are recognized when performance obligations are satisfied in accordance with contractual terms, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expectsrequired to be entitled torender service in exchange for services rendered, rentals provided or products sold. A performance obligation arises under contractsthe award. We expect that we will regularly consider the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with customersdecisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and isprograms. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

15

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed this CD&A with management, and based on such review and discussions, the unit of account under Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company accounts for services rendered and rentals provided separately if they are distinct and the service or rental is separately identifiable from other items provided to a customer and if a customer can benefit from the services rendered or rentals provided on its own or with other resources that are readily availableCompensation Committee recommended to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. A contract’s standalone selling prices are determined based on the pricesBoard that the Company charges for its services rendered, rentals provided and products sold. The majoritythis CD&A be included in this Amendment.
Compensation Committee of the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied over time, which is generally represented by a period of 30 days or less. The Company’s payment terms vary by the type of products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when the payment is due is typically 30 days.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Hedging Activities

At December 31, 2019, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements and no hedging contracts.

Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance

See Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – New Accounting Pronouncements.”

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates. A discussion of our market risk exposure in financial instruments follows.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Because we operate in a number of countries throughout the world, we conduct a portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The functional currency for our international operations, other than certain operations in the United Kingdom and Europe, is the U.S. dollar, but a portion of the revenues from our international operations is paid in foreign currencies. The effects of foreign currency fluctuations are partly mitigated because local expenses of such international operations are also generally denominated in the same currency. We continually monitor the currency exchange risks associated with all contracts not denominated in the U.S. dollar.

Assets and liabilities of certain subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Europe are translated at end of period exchange rates, while income and expenses are translated at average rates for the period. Translation gains and losses are reported as the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity.

We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes or use derivatives with complex features. When we believe prudent, we enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. We do not enter into forward foreign exchange contracts for trading purposes. At December 31, 2019, we had no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

At December 31, 2019, we had no variable rate debt outstanding.

Commodity Price Risk

Our revenues, profitability and future rate of growth significantly depend upon the market prices of oil and natural gas. Lower prices may also reduce the amount of oil and gas that can economically be produced. For additional information on the impact of changes in commodities prices on our business and prospects, see Item 1A to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of  

Directors and Stockholders
Superior Energy Services, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Superior Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each

The Report of the yearsCompensation Committee is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule II (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionany filing of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations ofunder the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditsirrespective of any general incorporation language in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Superior Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, the related notes and financial statement schedules as listed in the accompanying index (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1996.

Houston, Texas

February 28, 2020

any such filing.

e

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

December 31,

2019

2018

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

272,624

$

158,050

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $12,156 and

$12,080 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively

332,047

447,353

Income taxes receivable

740

-

Prepaid expenses

49,132

45,802

Inventory and other current assets

117,629

121,700

Assets held for sale

216,197

-

Total current assets

988,369

772,905

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and depletion

664,949

1,109,126

Operating lease right-of-use assets

80,906

-

Goodwill

137,695

136,788

Notes receivable

68,092

63,993

Restricted cash

2,764

5,698

Intangible and other long-term assets, net of accumulated amortization

50,455

127,452

Total assets

$

1,993,230

$

2,215,962

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

92,966

$

139,325

Accrued expenses

182,934

219,180

Income taxes payable

-

734

Current portion of decommissioning liabilities

3,649

3,538

Liabilities held for sale

44,938

-

Total current liabilities

324,487

362,777

Long-term debt, net

1,286,629

1,282,921

Decommissioning liabilities

132,632

126,558

Operating lease liabilities

62,354

-

Deferred income taxes

3,247

-

Other long-term liabilities

134,308

152,967

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock of $0.01 par value. Authorized - 5,000,000 shares; NaN issued

-

-

Common stock of $0.001 par value

Authorized - 25,000,000, Issued - 15,689,463, Outstanding - 14,717,051 at December 31, 2019

16

155

Authorized - 25,000,000, Issued and Outstanding - 15,488,542 as of December 31, 2018

Additional paid in capital

2,752,859

2,735,125

Treasury stock at cost, 972,412 and 0 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively

(4,290)

-

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net

(71,927)

(73,177)

Retained deficit

(2,627,085)

(2,371,364)

Total stockholders’ equity

49,573

290,739

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

1,993,230

$

2,215,962

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share data)

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Revenues:

Services

$

885,252

$

933,029

$

868,211

Rentals

376,247

380,296

279,936

Product sales

163,870

165,532

157,382

Total revenues

1,425,369

1,478,857

1,305,529

Costs and expenses:

Cost of services

698,150

699,322

675,896

Cost of rentals

128,695

136,135

114,128

Cost of sales

98,237

135,031

99,785

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion)

925,082

970,488

889,809

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion - services

121,805

175,417

218,994

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion - rentals

59,189

71,661

65,929

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion - sales

15,465

31,361

41,933

General and administrative expenses

268,226

276,468

285,597

Reduction in value of assets

17,185

322,713

10,390

Income (loss) from operations

18,417

(369,251)

(207,123)

Other expense:

Interest expense, net

(98,312)

(99,477)

(101,455)

Other expense

(2,484)

(1,678)

(3,299)

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

(82,379)

(470,406)

(311,877)

Income taxes

(4,626)

(43,003)

(131,562)

Net loss from continuing operations

(77,753)

(427,403)

(180,315)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax

(177,968)

(430,712)

(25,606)

Net loss

$

(255,721)

$

(858,115)

$

(205,921)

Basic and diluted loss per share:

Net loss from continuing operations

$

(5.05)

$

(27.69)

$

(11.79)

Loss from discontinued operations

(11.56)

(27.90)

(1.68)

Net loss

$

(16.61)

$

(55.59)

$

(13.47)

Weighted average shares outstanding

15,393

15,437

15,293

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2019 Executive Compensation

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Net loss

(255,721)

(858,115)

(205,921)

Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax

1,250

(5,750)

12,821

Comprehensive loss

$

(254,471)

$

(863,865)

$

(193,100)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

37

2019 Summary Compensation Table

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands, except share data)

Accumulated

Common

Additional

other

stock

Common

paid-in

Treasury

comprehensive

Retained

shares

stock

capital

stock

loss, net

deficit

Total

Balances, December 31, 2016

151,861,661 

$

152 

$

2,691,553 

$

-

$

(80,248)

$

(1,307,537)

$

1,303,920 

Net loss

-

-

-

-

-

(205,921)

(205,921)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

-

-

-

-

12,821 

-

12,821 

Stock-based compensation expense,

net of forfeitures

-

-

26,221 

-

-

-

26,221 

Exercise of stock options

5,998 

99 

-

-

-

99 

Transactions under stock plans

1,034,973 

(8,327)

-

-

-

(8,326)

Shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

360,465 

-

3,615 

-

-

3,615 

Balances, December 31, 2017

153,263,097 

$

153 

$

2,713,161 

$

-

$

(67,427)

$

(1,513,458)

$

1,132,429 

Net loss

-

-

-

-

-

(858,115)

(858,115)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

-

-

-

-

(5,750)

-

(5,750)

Forfeited dividends

-

-

-

-

-

209 

209 

Stock-based compensation expense,

net of forfeitures

-

-

24,076 

-

-

-

24,076 

Transactions under stock plans

1,071,371 

(5,200)

-

-

-

(5,198)

Shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

550,950 

-

3,088 

-

-

-

3,088 

Balances, December 31, 2018

154,885,418 

$

155 

$

2,735,125 

$

-

$

(73,177)

$

(2,371,364)

$

290,739 

Net loss

-

-

-

-

-

(255,721)

(255,721)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

-

-

-

-

1,250 

-

1,250 

Purchases of treasury stock

-

-

-

(4,290)

-

-

(4,290)

Stock-based compensation expense,

net of forfeitures

-

-

18,459 

-

-

-

18,459 

Transactions under stock plans

1,187,961 

(1,677)

-

-

-

(1,675)

Shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

532,292 

-

811 

-

-

-

811 

1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split

(140,916,208)

(141)

141 

-

-

-

-

Balances, December 31, 2019

15,689,463 

$

16 

$

2,752,859 

$

(4,290)

$

(71,927)

$

(2,627,085)

$

49,573

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

38


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss

$

(255,721)

$

(858,115)

$

(205,921)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
  activities:

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

271,410

400,848

438,716

Deferred income taxes

3,247

(61,058)

(182,553)

Reduction in value of assets

93,763

739,725

14,155

Right-of-use assets amortization

20,613

-

-

Stock based compensation expense

19,814

31,451

36,503

Other reconciling items, net

(16,023)

(9,545)

2,505

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

104,538

(50,116)

(93,309)

Prepaid expenses

(4,956)

(2,373)

(5,441)

Inventory and other current assets

(6,137)

(7,559)

(2,455)

Accounts payable

(12,278)

8,912

23,648

Accrued expenses

(37,482)

(21,113)

(8,458)

Income taxes

(1,258)

2,320

99,089

Other, net

(33,102)

(8,320)

(20,053)

Net cash provided by operating activities

146,428

165,057

96,426

Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments for capital expenditures

(140,465)

(221,370)

(164,933)

Proceeds from sales of assets

110,008

33,299

28,269

Net cash used in investing activities

(30,457)

(188,071)

(136,664)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

-

-

500,000

Principal payments on long-term debt

-

-

(500,000)

Payment of debt issuance costs

-

-

(11,967)

Purchases of treasury stock

(4,290)

-

-

Tax withholdings for vested restricted stock units

(1,677)

(5,199)

(8,326)

Other

675

2,613

3,268

Net cash used in financing activities

(5,292)

(2,586)

(17,025)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

961

(3,135)

3,654

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

111,640

(28,735)

(53,609)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

163,748

192,483

246,092

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

$

275,388

$

163,748

$

192,483

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

Cash Payments:

Interest paid

$

99,585

$

101,056

$

88,125

Income taxes paid (net of income tax refunds received)

5,354

3,137

(117,376)

Non-cash investing activity:

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses

10,567

26,259

11,522

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NotesThe following table summarizes the compensation awarded to, Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Superior Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassifiedearned by, or paid to conform to the 2019 presentation.

Business

The Company provides a wide variety of services and products to the energy industry. The Company serves major, national and independent oil and natural gas companies around the world and offers products and services with respect to the various phases of a well’s economic life cycle. The Company reports its operating results in 4 business segments: Drilling Products and Services; Onshore Completion and Workover Services; Production Services; and Technical Solutions. Given the Company’s long-term strategy of expanding geographically, the Company also provides supplemental segment revenue information in 3 geographic areas: U.S. land; U.S. offshore; and International.

Recent Developments

Combination

On December 18, 2019, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement (the Merger Agreement) to divest its U.S. service rig, coiled tubing, wireline, pressure control, flowback, fluid management and accommodations service lines (the Superior Energy U.S. Business) and combine them with Forbes Energy Services Ltd.’s (Forbes) complimentary service lines to create a new, publicly traded consolidation platformeach NEO for U.S. completion, production and water solutions (the Combination).

Following the completion of the Combination, which is expected to close in the second quarter of 2020, the Company will remain a globally diversified oilfield services company built around the following key product and service lines: premium drill pipe, bottom hole assemblies, completion tools and products, hydraulic workover, snubbing and production services and well control services.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Superior Energy U.S. Business and Forbes will be merged into a newly formed company (Newco). At the closing of the Combination, the Company will receive 49.9% of Newco’s issued and outstanding voting Class A Stock (the Class A Stock) and 100% of the issued and outstanding non-voting Class B Stock of Newco (the Class B stock), which will collectively represent an approximate 65% economic interest in Newco. The Company’s and Forbes’ economic interests in Newco are subject to adjustment within certain parameters based on Forbes’ net debt position calculated at closing pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In addition, certain lenders under Forbes’ existing term loan (the Forbes Term Loan) will exchange their portion of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Forbes Term Loan for approximately $30.0 million in newly issued mandatory convertible preferred shares of Newco (the Preferred Shares), which will be entitled to cash dividends at a rate of 5% per annum, payable semi-annually, and, on the third anniversary of the closing of the Combination will be subject to mandatory conversion into shares of Newco’s Class A Stock. After giving effect to such conversion, the Company would own an approximate 52% economic interest and Forbes ’existing stockholders would own an approximate 48% economic interest in Newco.

The Combination has been unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of each of the Company and Forbes and the special committee of the Board of Directors of Forbes. Newco filed a proxy statement/prospectus on February 12, 2020, pursuant to which Forbes will solicit proxies of its stockholders to approve the Combination at a special meeting of Forbes’ stockholders. However, certain stockholders of Forbes who will collectively own a majority of Forbes’ common stock on the record date for the Forbes special meeting have committed to vote the shares they beneficially own in favor of the Combination and have the ability to approve the Combination without the vote of any other stockholder of Forbes.

Related Financing Transactions

As a condition of the Combination, SESI, L.L.C. (SESI), the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, consummated an offer to exchange (the Exchange Offer) up to $635.0 million of SESI’s previously outstanding $800.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the Original Notes) for up to $635.0 million aggregate principal amount of SESI’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the New Notes) and conducted a concurrent consent solicitation (the Consent Solicitation) to amend the liens covenant in the indenture governing the Original Notes (the Original Notes Indenture) to permit the issuance of the Superior Secured Notes described below (the Proposed Amendment) upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in SESI’s offering memorandum and consent

solicitation statement, dated as of January 6, 2020 (as amended by the press releases dated January 16, 2020, January 22, 2020, January 31, 2020, February 18, 2020, February 19, 2020, February 20, 2020 and February 24, 2020 issued by the Company and Supplement No. 1 to the Offering Memorandum and Consent Solicitation, dated as of January 31, 2020 (the Offering Memorandum)). A supplemental indenture by and among SESI, the guarantors party thereto and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Proposed Amendment was executed on February 14, 2020. The Original Notes outstanding after the Exchange Offer are governed by the Original Notes Indenture, as amended by the Proposed Amendment, provided that the Proposed Amendment will only become operative immediately prior to the consummation of the Combination.

The Exchange Offer expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 21, 2020, and $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding Original Notes were validly tendered for exchange and not withdrawn, representing 77.24% of the aggregate principal amount of Original Notes outstanding upon commencement of the Exchange Offer. SESI accepted all validly tendered Original Notes and issued $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes pursuant to an indenture dated February 24, 2020 by and among SESI, the guarantors party thereto and UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee (the New Notes Indenture).

Substantially concurrently with the consummation of the Combination, eligible note holders will receive, in exchange for $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes, on a pro rata basis: (1) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of 9.750% Senior Second Lien Secured Notes due 2025 to be issued by Newco (the Newco Secured Notes), (2) $243.3 million aggregate principal amount of 8.750% Senior Second Lien Secured Notes due 2026 to be issued by SESI (the Superior Secured Notes), (3) $131.3 million in cash and (4) $6.35 million in cash constituting the total consent payment (the Combination Exchange). The indentures governing the Newco Secured Notes and the Superior Secured Notes will each contain restrictive covenants customary for issuances of high-yield secured notes of this type. On February 20, 2020, the Company entered into an amendment to the Merger Agreement (the Amendment). The Amendment amends certain covenants, among other things, to account for the amended terms of the Exchange Offer.

Exit and Discontinuation of the Hydraulic Fracturing Service Line

On December 10, 2019, the Company’s indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, Pumpco Energy Services, Inc. (Pumpco), completed its existing hydraulic fracturing field operations and determined to discontinue, wind down and exit its hydraulic fracturing operations. The Company intends to maintain an adequate number of employees to efficiently wind down Pumpco’s business and dispose of its assets over time. The financial results of Pumpco’s operations have historically been included in the Company’s Onshore Completions and Workover Services segment. Pumpco’s business is reflected as discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and its assets are in the process of being divested. See note 12 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for further discussion of discontinued operations. Discontinuing hydraulic fracturing aligns with the Company’s strategic objective to divest assets and service lines that do not compete for investment in the current market environment. Net proceeds from the divestiture of Pumpco’s assets will be used to reduce debt.

Reverse Stock Split

At a special meeting of stockholders held on December 18, 2019, the Company’s stockholders voted to approve a proposal authorizing the Board of Directors of the Company to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock (the Reverse Stock Split) and to proportionately reduce the number of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock. Following the special meeting of stockholders, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split.

As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, each 10 pre-split shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split automatically were converted to one issued and outstanding share of common stock without any action on the part of the stockholder. No fractional shares of common stock were issued as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, any stockholder who would have been entitled to a fractional share received a cash payment in lieu of such fractional shares. The total number of shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue has also been reduced by the same ratio.

Resumption of Trading on the NYSE

On September 26, 2019, the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) suspended trading of the Company’s common stock and commenced delisting proceedings due to the Company’s “abnormally low” stock price. Following the NYSE’s suspension of trading of our common stock, the Company appealed the NYSE staff’s determination. On September 27, 2019, the Company’s common stock commenced trading on the OTC Markets and, on October 4, 2019, the Company’s common stock also commenced trading on the OTCQX Best Market, operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. The NYSE formally withdrew the delisting determination, and, on December 26, 2019, the Company’s common stock resumed trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “SPN.”

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and

2017.
                                 
Name and Principal Position
 
Year
  
Salary
($)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
  
Option
Awards
(2)
  
Non-equity

Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(3)
  
All Other
Compensation
($)
(4)
  
Total ($)
 
David D. Dunlap
  
2019
   
850,000
   
0
   
1,111,800
   
637,484
   
2,204,756
   
226,460
   
5,030,500
 
President & Chief
  
2018
   
850,000
   
0
   
1,274,999
   
1,274,998
   
3,092,224
   
195,366
   
6,687,587
 
Executive Officer
  
2017
   
850,000
   
0
   
1,274,991
   
1,275,000
   
3,340,603
   
131,209
   
6,871,803
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
  
2019
   
475,200
   
0
   
372,911
   
213,823
   
646,525
   
97,322
   
1,805,781
 
Executive Vice President,
  
2018
   
433,333
   
0
   
395,998
   
396,003
   
703,462
   
96,281
   
2,025,077
 
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
  
2017
   
400,000
   
0
   
300,001
   
299,999
   
731,939
   
59,263
   
1,791,202
 
Brian K. Moore
  
2019
   
501,925
   
0
   
328,221
   
188,215
   
724,163
   
204,298
   
1,946,822
 
Executive
  
2018
   
501,925
   
0
   
376,442
   
376,446
   
988,774
   
206,997
   
2,450,584
 
Vice President
  
2017
   
501,925
   
0
   
376,448
   
376,442
   
1,057,995
   
156,218
   
2,469,028
 
A. Patrick Bernard
  
2019
   
355,725
   
0
   
232,606
   
133,381
   
500,262
   
166,132
   
1,388,106
 
Executive
  
2018
   
355,725
   
0
   
266,792
   
266,795
   
687,353
   
176,990
   
1,753,655
 
Vice President
  
2017
   
355,725
   
0
   
266,790
   
266,793
   
774,725
   
132,336
   
1,796.369
 
William B. Masters
  
2019
   
433,922
   
0
   
283,749
   
162,704
   
591,782
   
108,818
   
1,580,975
 
Executive Vice
  
2018
   
409,360
   
0
   
230,260
   
307,021
   
705,464
   
112,157
   
1,764,262
 
President and General Counsel
  
2017
   
409,360
   
0
   
307,015
   
307,021
   
796,374
   
102,944
   
1,922,714
 
James W. Spexarth
  
2019
   
327,600
   
0
   
214,250
   
122,828
   
292,053
   
78,280
   
1,035,011
 
Chief Accounting Officer
  
2018
   
307,208
   
0
   
320,079
   
152,421
   
342,676
   
72,845
   
1,195,229
 
  
2017
   
257,375
   
0
   
154,066
   
0
   
293,379
   
23,666
   
728,486
 

41

(1)The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the RSUs that we granted to the NEOs. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2019 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Please see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2019” for more information regarding the stock awards we granted in 2019 and “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Long-Term Incentives” sets forth additional information related to RSUs.
(2)The Black-Scholes option model is used to determine the grant date fair value of the options that we grant to the NEOs. For additional information, refer to “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives” and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2019.” For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2019 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2019” for more information regarding the option awards we granted in 2019.
(3)Amounts disclosed for 2019 reflect the AIP payout received by our NEOs and the aggregate cash payout of PSUs with a performance period ending on the last day of 2019. Please see the “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives” for more information regarding the AIP and PSUs.
         
Name
 
AIP Payout
  
Value of PSU Payout
 
Mr. Dunlap
 $
929,756
  $
1,275,000
 
Mr. Ballard
 $
346,525
  $
300,000
 
Mr. Moore
 $
347,713
  $
376,450
 
Mr. Bernard
 $
233,462
  $
266,800
 
Mr. Masters
 $
284,782
  $
307,000
 
Mr. Spexarth
 $
215,003
  $
77,050
 
16

(4)For 2019, the amount includes (i) annual contributions to the NEOs’ retirement account under our SERP and matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, (ii) life insurance premiums paid by the Company and (iii) the value of perquisites, consisting of premium payments made under the ArmadaCare program, the provision of an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, commuting expenses and accrued dividend equivalents for outstanding time-based stock awards that were granted, but had not vested until 2019 at which time dividends were paid, as set forth below:
                         
Name
 
SERP
Contributions
  
401(k)
Contributions
  
Life
Insurance
Premiums
  
ArmadaCare
  
Automobile
and
Commuting
  
Dividends
 
David D. Dunlap
 $
181,222
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
18,000
  $
0
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
 $
60,484
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
9,600
  $
0
 
Brian K. Moore
 $
172,356
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
9,864
  $
9,600
  $
0
 
A. Patrick Bernard
 $
119,468
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
19,426
  $
0
 
William B. Masters
 $
71,140
  $
11,200
  $
1,278
  $
14,760
  $
10,440
  $
0
 
James W. Spexarth
 $
40,595
  $
11,200
  $
1,258
  $
15,132
  $
9,600
  $
495
 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 2019

disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Major Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

The majority of the Company’s business is conducted with major and independent oil and gas companies. The Company evaluates the financial strength of its customers and provides allowances for probable credit losses when deemed necessary.

The market for the Company’s services and products is the oil and gas industry in the U.S. land and Gulf of Mexico areas and select international market areas. Oil and gas companies make capital expenditures on exploration, development and production operations. The level of these expenditures historically has been characterized by significant volatility.

The Company derives a large amount of revenue from a small number of major and independent oil and gas companies. There were no customers that exceeded 10% of the Company’s total revenues in 2019, 2018 or 2017.

The Company’s assets that are potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade receivables. The financial institutions in which the Company transacts business are large, investment grade financial institutions which are “well capitalized” under applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, thereby minimizing its exposure to credit risks for deposits in excess of federally insured amounts.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all short-term investments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount or the earned amount but not yet invoiced and do not bear interest. The Company maintains allowances for estimated uncollectible receivables, including bad debts and other items. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company’s best estimate of probable uncollectible amounts in existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and specific identification.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company applies net realizable value and obsolescence to the gross value of the inventory. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out or weighted-average cost methods for finished goods and work-in-process. Supplies and consumables consist principally of products used in the Company’s services provided to its customers.  The components of inventory balances are as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Finished goods

$

45,127

$

54,144

Raw materials

16,130

16,795

Work-in-process

9,360

5,544

Supplies and consumables

33,322

30,822

Total

$

103,939

$

107,305

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, except for assets for which reduction in value is recorded during the period and assets acquired using purchase accounting, which are recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition. Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Buildings and improvements

5

to

40

years

Machinery and equipment

2

to

25

years

Automobiles, trucks, tractors and trailers

3

to

10

years

Furniture and fixtures

2

to

10

years

Reduction in Value of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is assessed by a comparison of the carrying amount of such assets to their fair value calculated, in part, by the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. Cash flow estimates are based upon, among other things, historical results adjusted to reflect the best estimate of future market rates, utilization levels, and operating performance. Estimates of cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in economic conditions or changes in an asset’s operating performance. The Company’s assets are grouped by subsidiary or division for the impairment testing, which represent the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. If the asset grouping’s fair value is less than the carrying amount of those items, impairment losses are recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of such assets exceeds the fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. The net carrying value of assets not fully recoverable is reduced to fair value. The estimate of fair value represents the Company’s best estimate based on industry trends and reference to market transactions and is subject to variability. The oil and gas industry is cyclical and estimates of the period over which future cash flows will be generated, as well as the predictability of these cash flows, can have a significant impact on the carrying values of these assets and, in periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment charges. See note 11 for a discussion of the reduction in value of long-lived assets recorded during 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Goodwill

The following table summarizes the Company’s goodwill (in thousands):

Onshore

Drilling

Completion

Products

and Workover

Production

and Services

Services

Services

Total

Balance, December 31, 2017

$

138,493

$

583,550

$

85,817

$

807,860

Foreign currency translation adjustment

(1,705)

-

(529)

(2,234)

Reduction in value of assets

-

(583,550)

(1)

(85,288)

(668,838)

Balance, December 31, 2018

136,788

-

-

136,788

Foreign currency translation adjustment

907

-

-

907

Balance, December 31, 2019

$

137,695

$

-

$

-

$

137,695

(1)$417.0 million of reduction in value of assets was allocatedpresents additional information regarding PSU, RSU, stock option awards granted to Pumpco and is reported in the loss from discontinued operations forour NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2018.

The Company performs the goodwill impairment test on an annual basis as of October 1 or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level, which is consistent with the reporting segments. The Company assesses whether any indicators of impairment exist, which requires a significant amount of judgment. Such indicators may include a sustained decrease in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; a decline in the expected future cash flows; overall weakness in the industry; and slower growth rates.

Goodwill impairment exists when the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below the carrying value. In estimating the fair value of the reporting units, the Company uses a combination of an income approach and a market-based approach.

Income approach – The Company discounts the expected cash flows of each reporting unit. The discount rate used represents the estimated weighted average cost of capital, which reflects the overall level of inherent risk involved in the Company’s operations and cash flows and the rate of return an outside investor would expect to earn.

Market-based approach – The Company uses the guideline public company method, which focuses on comparing the Company’s risk profile and growth prospects to select reasonably similar publicly traded companies.

The Company weighs the income approach 80% and the market-based approach 20% due to differences between the Company’s reporting units and the peer companies’ size, profitability and diversity of operations. In order to validate the reasonableness of the estimated fair values obtained for the reporting units, a reconciliation of fair value to market capitalization is performed for each unit on a standalone basis. A control premium, derived from market transaction data, is used in this reconciliation to ensure that fair values are reasonably stated in conjunction with the Company’s capitalization. The Company uses all available information to estimate fair value of the reporting units, including discounted cash flows. A significant amount of judgment was involved in performing these evaluations given that the results are based on estimated future events.

2019.
                                     
 
Grant
Date
(2)
  
No. of Units
Granted
Under
Non-Equity

Incentive
Plan
Awards
(3)
  
Estimate Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
  
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
  
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(4)
  
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
  
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards
 
Name
Threshold
  
Target
  
Maximum
 
David D. Dunlap
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
637,500
  $
1,275,000
  $
2,550,000
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
33,507
  $
1,675,350
  $
3,350,700
  $
6,701,400
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
25,500
        $
1,111,800
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
25,914
  $
43.60
  $
637,484
 
                                     
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
237,600
  $
475,200
  $
950,400
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
11,239
  $
561,950
  $
1,123,900
  $
2,247,800
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
8,553
        $
372,911
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
8,692
  $
43.60
  $
213,823
 
                                     
Brian K. Moore
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
238,414
  $
476,829
  $
953,658
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
9,893
  $
494,650
  $
989,300
  $
1,978,600
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
7,528
        $
328,221
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
7,651
  $
43.60
  $
188,215
 
                                     
A. Patrick Bernard
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
160,076
  $
320,153
  $
640,305
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
7,011
  $
350,550
  $
701,100
  $
1,402,200
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
5,335
        $
232,606
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
5,422
  $
43.60
  $
133,381
 
                                     
William B. Masters
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
195,265
  $
390,530
  $
781,060
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
8,553
  $
427,650
  $
855,300
  $
1,710,600
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
6,508
        $
283,749
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
6,614
  $
43.60
  $
162,704
 
                                     
James W. Spexarth
                           
AIP
(1)
       $
147,420
  $
294,840
  $
589,680
             
PSUs
  
2/5/2019
   
6,457
  $
322,850
  $
645,700
  $
1,291,400
             
RSUs
  
2/5/2019
               
4,914
        $
214,250
 
Stock Options
  
2/5/2019
                  
4,993
  $
43.60
  $
122,828
 

43

17

(1)The amounts shown reflect possible payments under our 2019 AIP under which the NEOs were eligible to receive a cash bonus based on achievement of certain
pre-established
performance measures. Please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding our 2019 AIP.
(2)On February 5, 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the PSU, RSU and stock option awards for each of our NEOs.
(3)The amounts shown reflect PSU grants under our 2019 LTI plan. The PSUs have a
3-year
performance period during which the PSUs granted on February 5, 2019 have a performance period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. In addition, the PSUs vest on December 31, 2021, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. Please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the PSUs and the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.
(4)The stock options were granted as part of the 2019 LTI plan and vest
one-third
annually over a
3-year
period, commencing January 15, 2020. Please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019
Year-End

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the industry climate deteriorated rapidly due to the dramatic decline in crude oil prices and the related large sell-off in the equity markets for issuers in the energy industry. As a result of the adverse changes in the business environment that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2018 and the strategic review of the Company’s expected near-term cash flows from operations, the Company reviewed the goodwill for impairment. It was concluded that at December 31, 2018, the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment’s goodwill of $583.6 million and the Production Services segment’s goodwill of $85.3 million were fully impaired. The fair value of the Drilling Products and Services segment was substantially in excess of its carrying value. See note 11 for a discussion of the reduction in value of goodwill recorded during 2018. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s accumulated reduction in value of goodwill was $2,417.1 million.

Notes Receivable

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Wild Well Control, Inc., has decommissioning obligations related to its ownership of the oil and gas property and related assets. Notes receivable consist of a commitment from the seller of the property’s sole platform towards its eventual abandonment. Pursuant to an agreement with the seller, the Company will invoice the seller an agreed upon amount at the completion of certain decommissioning activities. The gross amount of this obligation totaled $115.0 million and is recorded at present value using an effective interest rate of 6.58%. The related discount is amortized to interest income based on the expected timing of the platform’s removal. The Company recorded interest income related to notes receivable of $4.2 million, $3.9 million and $3.6 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents cash held in escrow to secure the future decommissioning obligations related to the oil and gas property.

Intangible and Other Long-Term Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Estimated

Gross

Accumulated

Net

Gross

Accumulated

Net

Useful Lives

Amount

Amortization

Balance

Amount

Amortization

Balance

Customer relationships

17 years

$

19,902

$

(14,680)

$

5,222

$

133,374

$

(59,711)

$

73,663

Tradenames

10 years

8,907

(5,413)

3,494

20,717

(13,334)

7,383

Non-compete agreements

3 years

3,464

(3,106)

358

4,474

(3,313)

1,161

Total

$

32,273

$

(23,199)

$

9,074

$

158,565

$

(76,358)

$

82,207

Amortization expense was $2.1 million during 2019 and $5.6 million in each of 2018 and 2017. Based on the carrying values of intangible assets at December 31, 2019, amortization expense for the next five years (2020 through 2024) is estimated to be $1.2 million per year.

The Company recorded $57.7 million of expense related to the reduction in carrying values of intangibles at Pumpco, which is included in the loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, during 2019, the Company recorded $7.6 million of expense related to the reduction in carrying values of intangibles in the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment (see note 11).

Decommissioning Liabilities

The Company’s decommissioning liabilities associated with the oil and gas property and its related assets consist of costs related to the plugging of wells, the removal of the related platform and equipment, and site restoration. The Company reviews the adequacy of its decommissioning liabilities whenever indicators suggest that the estimated cash flows and/or relating timing needed to satisfy the liability have changed materially.

The following table summarizessets forth the activity for the Company’s decommissioning liabilities (in thousands): 

outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2019.
                                 
 
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1)
  
Option
Exercise
Price
  
Option
Expiration
Date
  
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(2)
  
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(3)
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
 
David D. Dunlap
              
35,373
  $
177,219
       
  
14,437
   
—  
  $
254.90
   
04/28/2020
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
6,021
   
—  
  $
346.00
   
12/10/2020
             
  
6,671
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
             
  
3,696
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
16,035
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
21,582
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
24,000
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
83,102
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
10,166
   
5,085
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
7,404
   
14,808
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
—  
   
25,914
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
              
11,623
  $
58,231
       
  
843
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
331
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
1,806
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
2,801
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
4,185
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
14,491
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
2,392
   
1,196
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
1,742
   
3,484
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
720
   
1,442
  $
85.60
   
03/01/2028
             
  
0
   
8,692
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
Brian K. Moore
              
10,442
  $
52,314
       
  
4,427
   
—  
  $
232.90
   
01/31/2021
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
4,007
   
—  
  $
280.09
   
01/31/2022
             
  
4,697
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
6,372
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
7,086
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
24,536
     $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
3,002
   
1,500
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
2,186
   
4,372
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
0
   
7,651
   
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
A. Patrick Bernard
              
7,400
  $
37,074
       
  
4,072
   
—  
  $
219.30
   
04/01/2020
             
  
1,498
   
—  
  $
346.00
   
12/10/2020
             
  
1,662
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
             
  
566
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
3,329
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
4,516
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
5,022
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
17,389
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
2,126
   
1,065
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
1,549
   
3,099
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
  
0
   
5,442
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             

December 31,

2019

2018

Balance at beginning of period

$

130,096

$

130,397

Accretion

6,332

4,906

Liabilities settled

(147)

(5,207)

Balance at end of period

$

136,281

$

130,096

Income Taxes

18

                                 
 
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1)
  
Option
Exercise
Price
  
Option
Expiration
Date
  
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(2)
  
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
  
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
 
William B. Masters
              
8,886
  $
44,519
       
  
3,200
   
—  
  $
219.30
   
04/01/2020
         
—  
   
—  
 
  
1,117
   
—  
  $
346.00
   
12/10/2020
             
  
1,239
   
—  
  $
285.90
   
12/08/2021
             
  
746
   
—  
  $
285.70
   
02/10/2022
             
  
3,047
   
—  
  $
230.30
   
01/15/2023
             
  
4,330
   
—  
  $
260.20
   
01/15/2024
             
  
4,816
   
—  
  $
172.70
   
01/15/2025
             
  
16,675
   
—  
  $
97.60
   
01/15/2026
             
  
2,448
   
1,224
  $
180.30
   
01/15/2027
             
  
1,783
   
3,565
  $
113.10
   
01/15/2028
             
     
6,614
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
                                 
James W. Spexarth
                        
  
1,144
   
2,288
  $
85.60
   
01/15/2028
   
7,374
  $
36,944
   
—  
   
—  
 
  
0
   
4,993
  $
43.60
   
02/05/2029
             
(1)Options vest ratably over a
3-year
period from the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the vesting date.
(2)The RSUs held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2019 vest as follows, subject to continued service through the vesting date:
Name
Total Unvested RSUs
Vesting Schedule
David D. Dunlap
35,373
14,614 shares vesting on 1/15/20
12,259 shares vesting on 1/15/21
8,500 shares vesting on 1/15/22
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
11,623
4,662 shares vesting on 1/15/20
4,110 shares vesting on 1/15/21
2,851 shares vesting on 1/15/22
Brian K. Moore
10,442
4,313 shares vesting on 1/15/20
3,619 shares vesting on 1/15/21
2,510 shares vesting on 1/15/22
A. Patrick Bernard
7,400
3,057 shares vesting on 1/15/20
2,564 shares vesting on 1/15/21
1,779 shares vesting on 1/15/22
William B. Masters
8,886
3,642 shares vesting on 1/15/20
3,074 shares vesting on 1/15/21
2,170 shares vesting on 1/15/22
James W. Spexarth
7,374
3,010 shares vesting on 1/15/20
2,726 shares vesting on 1/15/21
1,638 shares vesting on 1/15/22
(3)Based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2019 of $5.01, as reported on the NYSE.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2019
The Company accounts for income taxes and the related accounts under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws and rates that are in effect when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on the deferred income taxes is recognized in income in the period in which the change occurs. A valuation allowance is recorded when management believes it is more likely than not that at least some portion of any deferred tax asset will not be realized. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and applicable penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner as basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that could have been outstanding assumingfollowing table sets forth certain information regarding the exercise of stock options and conversionthe vesting of restricted stock units.

During 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred losses from continuing operations; as such, the impact of any incremental shares would be anti-dilutive.

Foreign Currency

Results of operations for foreign subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated using average exchange ratesRSUs during the period. Assets and liabilities of these foreign subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and the resulting translation adjustments are reported as accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Company’s stockholders’ equity.

For international subsidiaries where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar, financial statements are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the historical exchange rate for most of the long-term assets and liabilities and the balance sheet date exchange rate for most of the current assets and liabilities. An average exchange rate is used for each period for revenues and expenses. These transaction gains and losses, as well as any other transactions in a currency other than the functional currency, are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the currency exchange rates change. During 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded foreign currency losses of $0.8 million, $1.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions and includes such costs in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award).

Self-Insurance Reserves

The Company is self-insured, through deductibles and retentions, up to certain levels for losses under its insurance programs. The Company accrues for these liabilities based on estimates of the ultimate cost of claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. The Company regularly reviews the estimates of asserted and unasserted claims and provides for losses through reserves. The Company obtains actuarial reviews to evaluate the reasonableness of internal estimates for losses related to workers’ compensation, auto liability and group medical on an annual basis.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Loses on Financial Instruments. This update improves financial reporting by requiring earlier recognition of credit losses on financing receivables and other financial assets in scope by using the Current Expected Credit Losses model (CECL). The CECL model utilizes a lifetime expected credit loss measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses on financial instruments at the time the asset is originated or acquired. This update will apply to receivables arising from revenue transactions. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2023. The Company is evaluating the effect ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract. This update aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract will be expensed over the term of the hosting arrangement. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2020 on a prospective basis with respect to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2021. The Company is evaluating the effect ASU 2019-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent Events

In accordance with authoritative guidance, the Company has evaluated and disclosed all material subsequent events that occurred after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements were issued.

(2) Revenue

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when performance obligations are satisfied in accordance with contractual terms, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for services rendered, rentals provided and products sold. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities and revenues are reported on a net basis in the Company’s financial statements.

Performance Obligations

A performance obligation arises under contracts with customers and is the unit of account under Topic 606. The Company accounts for services rendered and rentals provided separately if they are distinct and the service or rental is separately identifiable from other items provided to a customer and if a customer can benefit from the services rendered or rentals provided on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. A contract’s standalone selling prices are determined based on the prices that the Company charges for its services rendered, rentals provided and products sold. The majority of the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied over time, which is generally represented by a period of 30 days or less. The Company’s payment terms vary by the type of products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when the payment is due is typically 30 days.

Services revenue: primarily represents amounts charged to customers for the completion of services rendered, including labor, products and supplies necessary to perform the service. Rates for these services vary depending on the type of services provided and can be based on a per job, per hour or per day basis.

Rentals revenue: primarily priced on a per day, per man hour or similar basis and consists of fees charged to customers for use of the Company’s rental equipment over the term of the rental period, which is generally less than twelve months.

Product sales: products are generally sold based upon purchase orders or contracts within the Company’s customers that include fixed or determinable prices but do not include right of return provisions or other significant post-delivery obligations. The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when title passes to the customer, the customer assumes risks and rewards of ownership, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery occurs as directed by the customer.

The Company expenses sales commissions when incurred because the amortization period would have been onefiscal year or less.

Disaggregation of revenue

The following table presents the Company’s revenues by segment disaggregated by geography (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

U.S. land

Drilling Products and Services

$

178,345

$

176,448

$

117,856

Onshore Completion and Workover Services

341,297

406,248

366,636

Production Services

138,300

195,363

151,632

Technical Solutions

40,363

31,137

34,283

Total U.S. land

$

698,305

$

809,196

$

670,407

U.S. offshore

Drilling Products and Services

$

125,104

$

100,855

$

91,507

Onshore Completion and Workover Services

-

-

-

Production Services

73,610

66,512

74,033

Technical Solutions

141,851

160,507

161,766

Total U.S. offshore

$

340,565

$

327,874

$

327,306

International

Drilling Products and Services

$

108,124

$

106,416

$

84,327

Onshore Completion and Workover Services

-

-

-

Production Services

193,920

156,650

147,116

Technical Solutions

84,455

78,721

76,373

Total International

$

386,499

$

341,787

$

307,816

Total Revenues

$

1,425,369

$

1,478,857

$

1,305,529

The following table presents the Company’s revenues by segment disaggregated by type (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

Services

Drilling Products and Services

$

69,958

$

54,997

Onshore Completion and Workover Services

303,542

364,500

Production Services

348,168

352,590

Technical Solutions

163,584

160,942

Total services

$

885,252

$

933,029

Rentals

Drilling Products and Services

$

291,975

$

281,750

Onshore Completion and Workover Services

37,755

41,748

Production Services

32,402

36,568

Technical Solutions

14,115

20,230

Total rentals

$

376,247

$

380,296

Product Sales

Drilling Products and Services

$

49,640

$

46,972

Onshore Completion and Workover Services

-

-

Production Services

25,260

29,367

Technical Solutions

88,970

89,193

Total product sales

$

163,870

$

165,532

Total Revenues

$

1,425,369

$

1,478,857

(3) Leases

Adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases

The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as the date of initial application. Therefore, prior period financial information has not been adjusted and continues to be reflected in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting policy. The standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months.

The standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients,” which, among other things, allows the Company to carry forward its historical lease classification.

The adoption of this standard resulted in the recording of operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities of approximately $100.0 million as of January 1, 2019, with 0 related impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of equity or condensed consolidated statement of operations. Short-term leases have not been recorded on the balance sheet.

Accounting Policy for Leases

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. All of the Company’s leases are operating leases and are included in ROU assets, accounts payable and operating lease liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligations to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the respective lease term. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease.

Overview

The Company’s operating leases are primarily for real estate, machinery and equipment, and vehicles. The terms and conditions for these leases vary by the type of underlying asset. Total operating lease expense was as follows (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

Long-term fixed lease expense

$

33,577

$

33,642

Long-term variable lease expense

406

749

Short-term lease expense

17,670

14,367

Total operating lease expense

$

51,653

$

48,758

Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

Operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 2019

Operating lease ROU assets

$

80,906

Accrued expenses

$

21,072

Operating lease liabilities

62,354

Total operating lease liabilities

$

83,426

Cash paid for operating leases

$

34,207

ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations

$

20,200

Weighted average remaining lease term

9 years

Weighted average discount rate

6.75%

Maturities of operating lease liabilities atended December 31, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):

for each of our NEOs.

2020

$       29,796

2021

21,653

2022

13,328

2023

9,632

2024

7,311

Thereafter

44,381

Total lease payments

126,101

Less imputed interest

(42,675)

Total

$       83,426

49

19

                 
 
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
  
Value Realized
on Exercise
  
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(1)
  
Value Realized
on Vesting
(2)
 
David D. Dunlap
  
—  
   
—  
   
6,114
  $
234,778
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,812
  $
69,581
 
Brian K. Moore
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,805
  $
69,312
 
A. Patrick Bernard
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,279
  $
49,114
 
William B. Masters
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,103
  $
42,355
 
James W. Spexarth
  
—  
   
—  
   
1,991
  $
76,454
 
(1)Mr. Masters’ value excludes 367 deferred RSUs to be distributed upon retirement in 5 equal annual installments.
(2)Value realized is calculated based on the closing sale price on the vesting date of the award.
2019 Pension Benefits Table

(4) Property, Plant and Equipment

A summary

None of property, plant and equipment is as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Machinery and equipment

$

2,425,526

$

3,229,793

Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements

255,719

278,339

Automobiles, trucks, tractors and trailers

22,727

26,522

Furniture and fixtures

40,694

52,045

Construction-in-progress

16,661

38,119

Land

48,534

58,047

Oil and gas producing assets

69,204

66,605

Total

2,879,065

3,749,470

Accumulated depreciation and depletion

(2,214,116)

(2,640,344)

Property, plant and equipment, net

$

664,949

$

1,109,126

The Company had $68.4 million and $74.9 million of leasehold improvements at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the life of the asset or the term of the lease using the straight line method. As of December 31, 2019, $179.1 million of property, plant and equipment relating to Pumpco was classified as assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet. Depreciation expense (excluding depletion, amortization and accretion) was $180.2 million, $258.6 million and $312.4 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(5) Debt 

The Company’s outstanding debt was as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Stated Interest Rate (%)

Long-term

Senior unsecured notes due September 2024

7.750

$

500,000

$

500,000

Senior unsecured notes due December 2021

7.125

800,000

800,000

Total debt, gross

1,300,000

1,300,000

Unamortized debt issuance costs

(13,371)

(17,079)

Total debt, net

$

1,286,629

$

1,282,921

Debt maturities presented as of December 31, 2019 were as follows (in thousands):

2020

$

-

2021

800,000

2022

-

2023

-

2024

500,000

Thereafter

-

Total

$

1,300,000

Credit Facility

The Company has an asset-based revolving credit facility which maturesour NEOs participated in October 2022. The borrowing base under the credit facility is calculated based on a formula referencing the borrower’s and the subsidiary guarantors’ eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible premium rental drill pipe less reserves. Availability under the credit facility is the lesser of (i) the commitments, (ii) the borrowing base and (iii) the highest principal amount permitted to be secured under the indenture governing the 7.125% senior unsecured notes due 2021. On September 20, 2019, the Company amended its credit facility to increase the letter of credit capacity from $100.0 million to $150.0 million. At December 31, 2019, the borrowing base was $220.0 million and the Company had $102.5 million of letters of credit outstanding that reduced its borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility. The credit agreement contains various covenants, including, but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, permitted investments, liens on assets, making distributions, transactions with affiliates, merger, consolidations, dispositions of assets and other provisions customaryany defined benefit pension plans in similar types of agreements.

2019.

50

Retirement Benefit Programs

Senior Unsecured Notes

The Company has outstanding $500 million of senior unsecured notes due September 2024. The indenture governing the 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2024 requires semi-annual interest payments on March 15 and September 15 of each year through the maturity date of September 15, 2024.

At December 31, 2019, the Company had outstanding $800 million of 7.125% senior unsecured notes due December 2021 (referred to herein as the Original Notes). In connection with the Exchange Offer, $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding Original Notes were validly tendered for exchange and not withdrawn, representing 77.24% of the aggregate principal amount of Original Notes outstanding upon commencement of the Exchange Offer. SESI accepted all validly tendered Original Notes and issued $617.9 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes pursuant to the New Notes Indenture. As a result of the Exchange Offer, as of February 24, 2020, the Company has outstanding $182.1 million of Original Notes. The Original Notes Indenture requires semi-annual interest payments on June 15 and December 15of each year through the maturity date of December 15, 2021.  The New Notes Indenture and the Original Notes Indenture each contain customary events of default and require that we satisfy various covenants.

(6) Stock-Based and Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Company is authorized to grant restricted stock units (RSUs), stock options, cash restricted stock units (CRSUs), performance share units (PSUs) and other cash and stock awards as part of the Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP). The Compensation Committee determines the recipients of the equity awards, the type of awards made, the required performance measures, and the timing and duration of each grant. At December 31, 2019, 328,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were available for future grants under the plan.

Total stock-based compensation expense and the associated tax benefits are as follows (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Stock options

$

2,743

$

4,247

$

4,289

Restricted stock units

15,716

19,828

21,899

Cash restricted stock units

298

-

-

Performance share units

935

6,912

9,740

Total compensation expense

19,692

30,987

35,928

Related income taxes

4,569

7,189

8,335

Total compensation expense, net of income taxes

$

15,123

$

23,798

$

27,593

Total stock-based compensation expense is reflected in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

Equity-Classified Awards

Stock Options

Stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. The stock options generally vest in equal installments over three years and expire in ten years from the grant date. Non-vested stock options are generally forfeited upon termination of employment.

The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock option grants based on the fair value at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The Company uses historical data, among other factors, to estimate the expected volatility and the expected life of the stock options. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected life of the stock option.

The share and per-share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of the 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split.

The weighted average fair values of stock options granted and the assumptions used in estimating those fair values are as follows:

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Weighted average fair value of stock options granted

$

24.60

$

56.12

$

83.60

Black-Scholes-Merton Assumptions:

Risk free interest rate

2.57

%

2.43

%

1.96

%

Expected life (years)

6

6

6

Volatility

56.62

%

51.21

%

48.22

%

The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2019:

Number of Options

Weighted Average Option Price

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)

Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)

Outstanding at beginning of period

643,545

$

182.69

5.0

$

-

Granted

59,286

$

43.6

Exercised

-

$

-

Expired

(33,471)

$

207.88

Outstanding at end of period

669,360

$

169.11

4.7

$

-

Exercisable at end of period

566,946

$

185.48

4.0

$

-

Options expected to vest at end of period

102,414

$

78.47

8.6

$

-

The Company received $0, $0 and $0.1 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, from employee stock option exercises. The Company has reported tax benefits of $0, $0 and $0.1 million from the exercise of stock options for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The following table summarizes non-vested stock option activity for 2019:

Number of Options

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Non-vested at beginning of period

141,286

$

80.00

Granted

59,286

$

43.60

Vested

(98,158)

$

112.09

Non-vested at end of period

102,414

$

78.47

At December 31, 2019, the unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was $2.0 million. The Company expects to recognize $1.4 million and $0.6 million of compensation expense associated with these options during 2020 and 2021, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs vest in equal annual installments over three years. On the vesting date, each RSU is converted to one share of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate value determined by the Company’s closing stock price on the vesting date. Holders of RSUs are not entitled to any rights of a stockholder, such as the right to vote shares.

The share and per-share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of the 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split.

The following table summarizes RSU activity for 2019:

Number of RSUs

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Non-vested at beginning of period

342,243

$

132.15

Granted

269,032

$

40.57

Vested

(162,404)

$

127.64

Forfeited

(34,905)

$

85.47

Non-vested at end of period

413,966

$

78.32

At December 31, 2019, there was $13.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs. The Company expects to recognize $9.4 million, $3.4 million, and $0.3 million associated with unvested RSUs for 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively.

Liability-Classified Awards

Cash Restricted Stock Units (CRSUs)

During 2019, the Company granted CRSUs to its employees as part of the Company’s LTIP. CRSUs vest in equal annual installments over three years. The ultimate amount earned is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on each of the vesting dates. The grant date fair value of the CRSUs was determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The CRSUs liability is adjusted, based on the price changes in the Company’s common stock, through the end of each vesting period. At December 31, 2019, there were 174,424 CRSUs outstanding.

Performance Share Units (PSUs)

The Company has issued PSUs to its employees as part of the Company’s LTIP. There is a three year performance period associated with each PSU grant. The two performance metrics are the Company’s return on assets and total stockholder return relative to those of the Company’s pre-defined “peer group.” The PSUs will settle in cash or a combination of cash and up to 50% of equivalent value in the Company’s common stock, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

At December 31, 2019, there were 315,213 PSUs outstanding (94,091, 100,052 and 121,070 related to performance periods ending December 31, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively). The Company has recorded both current and long-term liabilities for this compensation award.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)

Eligible employees were allowed to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount during six-month offering periods beginning on January 1st and July 1st of each year the ESPP was in effect and ending on June 30 and December 31 of each year the ESPP was in effect, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the ESPP was terminated in accordance with its terms.

The following table summarizes ESPP activity (in thousands except shares):

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Cash received for shares issued

$

689

$

2,625

$

3,074

Compensation expense

$

122

$

463

$

542

Shares issued

532,292

550,950

360,465

401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan

The Company maintains a defined contribution profit sharing plan for employees who have satisfied minimum service requirements. Employees may contribute up to 75% of their eligible earnings to the plan subject to the contribution limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company provides a nondiscretionary match of 100% of an employee’s contributions to the plan, up to 4% of the employee’s salary. The Company made contributions of $10.5 million, $10.0 million and $8.4 million 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan which allows senior management to defer up to 75% of their base salary, up to 100% of their bonus, up to 100% of the cash portion of their PSU compensation and up to 100% of the vested RSUs to the plan. The Company also maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its non-employee directors which allows each director to defer up to 100% of their cash compensation paid by the Company and up to 100% of their vested RSUs to the plan. Payments are made to participants based on their annual enrollment elections and plan balances.

The following table summarizes deferred compensation balances (in thousands):

December 31,

Balance sheet location

2019

2018

Deferred compensation assets

Intangible and other long-term assets, net

$

15,499

$

13,306

Deferred compensation liabilities, short-term

Accounts payable

$

1,372

$

1,138

Deferred compensation liabilities, long-term

Other long-term liabilities

$

23,466

$

19,766

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

The Company has a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP).

The SERP provides retirement benefits to the Company’s executive officers and certain other designated key employees. The SERP is an unfunded,
non-qualified
defined contribution retirement plan and all contributions under the planSERP are unfundedin the form of credits to a notional account maintained for each participant. The Company may elect to set aside funds in a rabbi trust to cover the benefits under the SERP, though the funds remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.
Contributions: Under the SERP, the Company madegenerally makes annual contributions to a retirement account based on age and years of service. The participants in the plan received contributions ranging from 5%2.5% to 35%25% of salary and annual cash bonus based on the participant’s age and years of service. Executives whose combined age and years of service was at least 55 as of December 31, 2008, receive higher annual contributions, ranging from 10% to 35% of base salary and annual cash bonus. The highest annual contribution made for an NEO during 2019 was 20%. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may also make discretionary contributions to a participant’s SERP account.
Vesting: A participant vests in his SERP account upon the earliest to occur of: (i) attaining six years of service (including service prior to the adoption of the SERP), upon which totaled $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $0.9 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During 2019, 2018 and 2017,amounts in the SERP account vest in 20% annual increments provided the participant remains employed; (ii) attaining age 65; (iii) a change of control; (iv) becoming disabled; or (v) termination of the participant’s employment without cause by the Company. Regardless of their vested status, participants will forfeit all benefits under the SERP if they are terminated for cause or, if within 36 months after a termination without cause, engage in any activity in competition with any activity of the Company paid $2.3 million, $0 and $0, respectively,or inimical, contrary or harmful to eligible participants in the SERP. The participation and fundinginterests of the Company.
Earnings: Following the end of each plan year, SERP was suspended incredits are adjusted to reflect earnings on the first quarter of 2020.

(7) Income Taxes

The components of loss from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Domestic

$

(81,443)

$

(448,575)

$

(270,221)

Foreign

(936)

(21,831)

(41,656)

$

(82,379)

$

(470,406)

$

(311,877)

The components of income tax benefit are as follows (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Current:

Federal

$

-

$

-

$

-

State

1,573

2,118

(750)

Foreign

(3,359)

14,856

9,137

(1,786)

16,974

8,387

Deferred:

Federal

1,792

(66,039)

(142,590)

State

1,622

(4,161)

6,109

Foreign

(6,254)

10,223

(3,468)

(2,840)

(59,977)

(139,949)

$

(4,626)

$

(43,003)

$

(131,562)

A reconciliationaverage daily balance of the U.S. statutory federal taxnotional accounts during the year, at a rate of interest equal to the consolidated effective taxCompany’s

after-tax
long-term borrowing rate isfor the year.
Payout: Upon separation from service, participants are paid their vested SERP accounts in a lump sum or installments, as follows (in thousands):

elected by the participant, commencing seven months after separation from service.

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Computed expected tax benefit

$

(17,513)

$

(98,785)

$

(109,157)

Increase (decrease) resulting from

State and foreign income taxes

4,019

10,437

16,437

Reduction in value of assets

(233)

27,680

-

U.S. Tax Reform

-

-

(39,603)

Other

9,101

17,665

761

Income tax benefit

$

(4,626)

$

(43,003)

$

(131,562)

During 2018,

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (NQDC Plan)
The NQDC Plan provides an income deferral opportunity for executive officers and certain senior managers of the Company recorded a $668.9 million reduction in value of goodwill relating to its Onshore Completion and Workover Services and Production Services segments. For tax purposes, the goodwill impairment generated a reduction to the permanent book-tax basis difference of $548.8 million and a reduction to the book-tax temporary basis difference of $102.0 million net of current year amortization expense of $18.0 million. The 2018 effective tax rate was significantly impacted by the permanent adjustment related to the reduction in value of assets caused by the goodwill impairment.

On December 22, 2017, U.S. Tax Reform was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effectivewho qualify for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a modified territorial system. As a result, the Company recorded a provisional income tax benefit of $39.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2017. During 2018, the Company finalized its assessment of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform and no material adjustments were recorded.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Deferred tax assets:

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$

1,291

$

856

Operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

136,647

146,926

Compensation and employee benefits

35,532

38,006

Decommissioning liabilities

29,405

27,979

Operating leases

1,002

-

Other

24,903

25,331

228,780

239,098

Valuation allowance

(84,741)

(25,571)

Net deferred tax assets

144,039

213,527

Deferred tax liabilities:

Property, plant and equipment

114,024

146,971

Notes receivable

12,977

12,977

Goodwill and other intangible assets

20,285

38,955

Other

-

14,624

Deferred tax liabilities

147,286

213,527

Net deferred tax liability

$

3,247

$

-

At December 31, 2019, the Company had $210.0 million in U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, which are available to reduce future taxable income. The expiration date for utilization of the U.S. loss carryforwards is 2037 for losses generated before 2018. Losses generated in 2018 and later cannot be carried back and have an indefinite carryforward that is limited to 80% of taxable income each year. At December 31, 2019, the Companyparticipation. Participants may also had various state net operating loss carryforwards with expiration dates from 2020 to 2038. A net deferred tax asset of $19.6 million reflects the expected future tax benefit for the state loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2019, the Company also had a U.S. foreign tax credit carryforward of $54.5 million with expiration dates from 2025 to 2027.

Management evaluates whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax assets. The Company has incurred a cumulative loss over the three-year period ended December 31, 2019. Such evidence limits the ability to consider other projections of future growth. After consideringdefer all available evidence at December 31, 2019, the Company determined thator a portion of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. Accordingly,common stock due upon vesting of RSU awards. The NQDC Plan is unfunded, but the Company increased deferred income tax expense by an additional $61.9 millionmay elect to set aside funds in a rabbi trust to cover the benefits under the plan, though the funds remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.

20

Contributions: Participants in the valuation allowance.

base salary, 100% of their annual bonus and 50% of the cash payout value of any PSUs. The Company has not provided income tax expense on earningsCompensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide a match of its foreign subsidiaries, sinceup to 100% of the deferrals; however, the Company has reinvested never elected to grant a match.

Vesting: Participants are immediately 100% vested in their benefits under the NQDC Plan.
Earnings: Participants may choose from a variety of investment options to invest their deferrals over the deferral period. Participants earn a rate of return on their NQDC Plan account that approximates the rate of return that would be provided by certain specified mutual funds that participants may designate from a list of available funds selected by the NQDC Plan administrative committee.
Payout: Benefits are paid in either a
lump-sum
or expectsin equal annual installments over a
2-
to
15-year
period, as elected by the participant. Generally, benefits that are due as a result of a termination of service are paid or commence in the seventh month after termination. However, only participants who are at least age 55 with at least five years of service at termination are eligible to reinvest undistributed earnings outsidereceive or continue receiving installment distributions following termination.
See “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information on these retirement programs.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contribution for 2019
                     
Name
 
Executive
Contributions in
2019
(1)
  
Registrant
Contributions
in 2019
(2)
  
Aggregate
Earnings
in 2019
  
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
  
Aggregate
Balance at
12/31/19
 
David D. Dunlap
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
  $
101,581
(3)  
—  
  $
459,682
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
181,222
   
67,087
(4)  
—  
  $
1,398,156
 
                     
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
60,484
  $
12,872
(4)  
—  
  $
294,060
 
                     
Brian K. Moore
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
   
—  
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
172,356
  $
55,211
(4)  
—  
  $
1,174,037
 
                     
A. Patrick Bernard
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
  $
1,538,130
(3)  
—  
  $
8,889,553
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
119,468
  $
77,174
(4)  
—  
  $
1,519,295
 
                     
William B. Masters
               
NQDC Plan
 $
217,191
   
—  
  $
22,313
(3)  
—  
  $
1,488,049
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
71,140
  $
39,299
(4)  
—  
  $
783,999
 
                     
James W. Spexarth
               
NQDC Plan
  
—  
   
—  
  $
89,964
(3)  
—  
  $
445,313
 
SERP
  
—  
  $
40,595
  $
1,999
(4)  
—  
  $
76,941
 
(1)Of the contributions reflected in this column, the following contribution is part of the total compensation for 2019 and is included under the Salary column in the “Summary Compensation Table” herein: Mr. Masters — $43,336. The remainder of the contributions reported in this column for Mr. Masters is part of the total compensation reported for 2016 and 2018, but paid in 2019 (2016 PSU grant and 2018 Bonus paid in 2019).
(2)The amounts reflected are part of each executive’s total compensation for 2019 and are included under the All Other Compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(3)With regard to the NQDC Plan, participant contributions are treated as if invested in one or more investment vehicles selected by the participant. The annual rate of return for these funds for fiscal year 2019 was as follows:
21

Fund
One Year Total Return
NVIT Government Money Market V
1.83
%
JPMorgan IT Insurance Tr Core Bond 1
8.18
%
Vanguard VIF Total Bond Market Index
8.67
%
MFS VIT Value Svc
29.51
%
Fidelity VIP Index 500 Initial
31.35
%
American Funds IS Growth 2
30.77
%
JPMorgan Insurance Tr Mid Cap Value 1
26.76
%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Svc
35.16
%
DFA VA U.S. Targeted Value
22.56
%
Vanguard VIF Small Co Gr
28.05
%
MFS VIT II International Intrs Val Svc
25.64
%
Invesco VI II International Growth I
28.57
%
Vanguard VIF Real Estate Index
28.81
%
Templeton Global Bond VIP I
2.26
%
Vanguard VIF Mid Cap Index
30.87
%
DWS Small Cap Index VIP A
25.22
%
NVIT International Index I
21.77
%
(4)Pursuant to the terms of the SERP, aggregate earnings for 2019 were calculated at a rate of interest equal to 5.82%, which was our
after-tax
long-term borrowing rate.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
In addition to the U.S. indefinitely. Atpost-employment benefits under the Company’s 401(k) plan, the SERP and the NQDC Plan, each of our NEOs are entitled to severance benefits upon termination of employment, including in connection with a change of control of the Company under their employment agreements. See also “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information.
Below is a description of the employment agreements and Change of Control Severance Plan in place with each of our NEOs. As required by the SEC’s disclosure rules, we have included disclosure quantifying the potential payments to our NEOs under various termination and change of control scenarios based on the agreements in place as of December 31, 2019,2019.
Executive Employment Agreements and Severance Program
All of our NEOs are party to the Company’s foreign subsidiaries hadsame form of employment agreement. The initial term of each employment agreement is three years and the term automatically extends for an overall accumulated deficitadditional year on the second anniversary and each subsequent anniversary, unless prior written notice not to extend the term is provided by the Company or the NEO. The employment agreements entitles our NEOs to:
a base salary;
eligibility for annual incentive bonuses and LTI awards as approved by the Compensation Committee;
participation in earnings.the retirement and welfare benefit plans of the Company; and
participation in our Change of Control Severance Plan
Termination due to Incapacity, No Cause, Good Reason without a Change of Control
.    If (1) the Company terminates an NEO’s employment (a) due to incapacity or (b) without cause or (2) the NEO terminates his employment for good reason as defined in the employment agreement and the termination under (1)(b) or (2) is not due to a change of control, then the Company will pay or provide the NEO:
the NEO’s base salary through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid cash incentive compensation for the preceding calendar year, any rights under the terms of equity awards and any medical or other welfare benefits required by law (the Accrued Amounts);
22

a lump sum payment equal to:
two times the sum of the NEO’s annual salary plus target annual bonus; and
the NEO’s
pro-rated
target annual bonus for the year of termination; and
Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for up to 24 months for the NEO and the NEO’s spouse and/or family (the Welfare Continuation Benefit).
The payments and benefits described above (other than the Accrued Amounts) are subject to the NEO’s timely execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company.
Termination for No Cause or Good Reason with Change of Control
.
    If the NEO is terminated by the Company without cause or if the NEO terminates his employment for good reason and the termination occurs within 6 months before or 24 months after a change of control, then the Company will be required to pay or provide:
the Accrued Amounts;
a cash severance payment pursuant to the terms of our Change of Control Severance Plan described below;
a lump sum amount equal to the NEO’s
pro-rated
target annual bonus for the year of termination;
outplacement services for one year after termination at a cost of up to $10,000; and
the Welfare Continuation Benefit.
The payments and benefits described above (other than the Accrued Amounts) are subject to the NEO’s timely execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company. The Company does not intendprovide excise tax
gross-ups
under the employment agreements or Change of Control Severance Plan discussed below.
Termination for Cause, Death or Without Good Reason
. If the NEO is terminated by the Company for cause, due to repatriate the earningsNEO’s death or by the NEO without good reason, then the Company will only be required to pay to the NEO or the NEO’s estate the Accrued Amounts.
Each employment agreement contains an indefinite confidentiality and protection of its profitable foreign subsidiaries. Theinformation covenant and a mutual
non-disparagement
covenant for one year after termination of employment. If the NEO is terminated by the Company has not provided U.S. income taxes for such earnings. These earnings could become subject to U.S. income taxcause or if repatriated. It is not practicable to estimate the amountNEO terminates the NEO’s employment without good reason, the NEO will also be bound by a
non-compete
and
non-solicitation
covenant for one year after the date of taxes that might be payable on such undistributed earnings.

The Company files income tax returnsthe NEO’s termination.

Change of Control Severance Plan.
Each NEO participates in the U.S., including federalCompany’s Change of Control Severance Plan and various state filings, andis eligible to receive certain foreign jurisdictions.cash severance payments upon a termination of employment without cause or for good reason that occurs within 6 months before or 24 months after a change of control. The number of years that are openpotential severance payments due under the statute of limitations and subject to audit varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The Company remains subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for years after 2017.

The Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $13.2 million, $30.6 million and $30.7 millionplan are determined as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, allthe date of which would impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. 

The activity in unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period

$

30,558

$

30,656

$

29,956

Additions based on tax positions related to prior years

2,500

1,899

5,576

Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years

-

(1,864)

(4,671)

Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

-

(133)

(205)

Reductions relating to settlements with taxing authorities

(19,852)

-

-

Unrecognized tax benefits at end of period

$

13,206

$

30,558

$

30,656

The amounts above include accrued interest and penaltieschange of $5.0 million, $9.7 million and $9.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $19.9 million relating to settlements of income tax audits in foreign countries. Interest and penalties associated with the unrecognized tax benefits are classified as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

(8) Segment Information

Business Segments

The Drilling Products and Services segment rents and sells bottom hole assemblies, premium drill pipe, tubulars and specialized equipment for use with onshore and offshore oil and gas well drilling, completion, production and workover activities. It also provides on-site accommodations and machining services. The Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment provides fluid handling services and workover and maintenance services. The Production Services segment provides intervention services such as coiled tubing, cased hole and mechanical wireline, hydraulic workover and snubbing, production testing and optimization, and remedial pumping services. The Technical Solutions segment provides services typically requiring specialized engineering, manufacturing or project planning, including well containment systems, stimulation and sand control, services, and the production and sale of oil and gas.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, operating results of Pumpco are reported in discontinued operations (see note 12). Previously those operating results were reported within the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment.

The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on income or loss from operations excluding allocated corporate expenses. The segment measurea sharing pool that is calculated as follows: segment revenues less segment operating expenses, depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense and reduction ina percentage of the transaction value of assets.(with the sharing pool increasing or decreasing as the transaction value increases or decreases, respectively). The Company uses this segment measuredoes not provide excise tax

gross-ups
under our severance plan.
Calculation of change of control severance benefits
. The severance benefit is equal to evaluate its reportable segments because iteach participant’s portion of the total cash available in the sharing pool. Each participant’s severance benefit will be determined based on the date of the change of control and will ensure: (1) each participant receives the same percentage of the total net
after-tax
benefit that would be received by all participants under the plan as the participant’s percentage interest; and (2) the total net
after-tax
benefit received by all participants is the measure that is most consistent with how the Company organizes and manages its business operations. Corporate and other costs primarily include expenses related to support functions, salaries and benefits for corporate employees and stock-based compensation expense.

maximized.

56

23

Summarized financial information for the Company’s segments is as follows (in thousands):

2019

Onshore

Drilling

Completion

Products and

and Workover

Production

Technical

Corporate and

Consolidated

Services

Services

Services

Solutions

Other

Total

Revenues

$

411,573 

$

341,297 

$

405,830 

$

266,669

$

-

$

1,425,369

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

154,503 

274,162 

328,527 

167,890 

-

925,082 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization

and accretion

83,999 

33,699 

51,370 

22,665 

4,726 

196,459 

General and administrative expenses

60,094 

25,621 

29,622 

59,587 

93,302 

268,226 

Reduction in value of assets

-

8,122 

2,055 

7,008 

-

17,185 

Income (loss) from operations

112,977 

(307)

(5,744)

9,519

(98,028)

18,417

Interest income (expense), net

-

-

-

4,172 

(102,484)

(98,312)

Other income

-

-

-

-

(2,484)

(2,484)

Income (loss) from continuing operations 

before income taxes

$

112,977 

$

(307)

$

(5,744)

$

13,691

$

(202,996)

$

(82,379)

2018

Onshore

Drilling

Completion

Products and

and Workover

Production

Technical

Corporate and

Consolidated

Services

Services

Services

Solutions

Other

Total

Revenues

$

383,719 

$

406,248 

$

418,525 

$

270,365 

$

-

$

1,478,857 

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

148,019 

315,291 

342,420 

164,758 

-

970,488 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization

and accretion

112,111 

68,183 

66,993 

25,653 

5,499 

278,439 

General and administrative expenses

53,688 

24,386 

41,499 

57,600 

99,295 

276,468 

Reduction in value of assets

-

227,801 

92,252 

2,660 

322,713 

Income (loss) from operations

69,901 

(229,413)

(124,639)

22,354 

(107,454)

(369,251)

Interest income (expense), net

-

-

-

3,915 

(103,392)

(99,477)

Other expense

-

-

-

-

(1,678)

(1,678)

Income (loss) from continuing operations 

before income taxes

$

69,901 

$

(229,413)

$

(124,639)

$

26,269 

$

(212,524)

$

(470,406)

2017

Onshore

Drilling

Completion

Products and

and Workover

Production

Technical

Corporate and

Consolidated

Services

Services

Services

Solutions

Other

Total

Revenues

$

293,690 

$

366,636 

$

372,781 

$

272,422 

$

-

$

1,305,529 

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

128,381 

282,695 

303,256 

175,477 

-

889,809 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization

and accretion

131,394 

81,238 

78,999 

29,506 

5,719 

326,856 

General and administrative expenses

51,265 

34,856 

48,655 

51,679 

99,142 

285,597 

Reduction in value of assets

1,356 

919 

-

8,115 

-

10,390 

Income (loss) from operations

(18,706)

(33,072)

(58,129)

7,645 

(104,861)

(207,123)

Interest income (expense), net

-

-

-

3,567 

(105,022)

(101,455)

Other expense

-

-

-

-

(3,299)

(3,299)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

before income taxes

$

(18,706)

$

(33,072)

$

(58,129)

$

11,212 

$

(213,182)

$

(311,877)

57


Identifiable Assets

Onshore

Drilling

Completion

Products and

and Workover

Production

Technical

Corporate and

Consolidated

Services

Services

Services

Solutions

Other

Total

December 31, 2019

$

659,621 

$

467,697 

$

421,848 

$

377,627

$

66,437 

$

1,993,230

December 31, 2018

$

587,264 

$

808,037 

$

434,430 

$

340,161 

$

46,070 

$

2,215,962 

December 31, 2017

$

662,968 

$

1,501,214 

$

512,256 

$

377,549 

$

56,238 

$

3,110,225 

At December 31, 2019,The total severance benefits payable under the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment included $216.2 million of identifiable assets relating to Pumpco that were classified as assets held for saleplan may not exceed the “sharing pool.” The sharing pool is determined based on the consolidated balance sheet, see note 12.

During 2019, the Company sold its drilling rig service line, which was previously includedtransaction value as defined in the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment. This service line included 12 active U.S. land based drilling rigs and associated equipment withplan at the time of the change of control as follows:

         
Transaction Value
(in Billions)
 
Sharing Pool
(6 Executives)
  
Sharing Pool as a
Percentage of
Transaction Value
(Approximate)
 
$1.0
 $
14,200,000
   
1.42
%
$2.0
 $
17,125,601
   
0.86
%
$2.5
 $
17,726,908
   
0.71
%
$3.0
 $
18,345,266
   
0.61
%
$3.5
 $
18,981,202
   
0.54
%
If the actual transaction value at the time of a carryingchange of control falls between the transaction values shown above, the sharing pool will be interpolated. If the transaction value of $66.2 million.is greater than the transaction values identified above, the sharing pool value will increase linearly. The Company received $78.0 million in cash proceeds and recognized a $0.2 million loss on sale of assets.Compensation Committee will determine the sharing pool should the applicable transaction value fall outside the values above. In addition, the Company recorded a $7.5 million impairmentsharing pool values will be adjusted if new participants are added to or removed from the plan between the effective date of the intangibles associatedplan and the date of the change of control. Specifically, the sharing pool will be decreased or increased, as applicable, by the amount that is equal to the applicable transaction value multiplied by 0.07% or 0.04% if the individual is in the top half or bottom half, respectively, of participants ranked by their “combined compensation” (as defined in the plan), as determined by the Compensation Committee. Under the plan, a participant’s “combined compensation” is the sum of the participant’s base salary, target bonus and unvested LTI, as those terms are defined in the plan.
Calculation of participant’s percentage interest in the sharing pool
. Each participant’s interest or “participation alignment” in the sharing pool is initially determined by dividing the participant’s “combined compensation” by the sum of the combined compensation for all participants, thus resulting in a percentage amount for each participant which, add up to 100%. The difference between the participation alignment of the participant with the disposed assets.

Capital Expenditures

Onshore

Drilling

Completion

Products and

and Workover

Production

Technical

Corporate and

Consolidated

Services

Services

(1)

Services

Solutions

Other

Total

December 31, 2019

$

63,252 

$

5,830 

$

17,009 

$

11,377 

$

6,254 

$

103,722 

December 31, 2018

$

46,649 

$

39,699 

$

8,651 

$

16,221 

$

2,056 

$

113,276 

December 31, 2017

$

27,219 

$

15,871 

$

7,860 

$

13,296 

$

1,143 

$

65,389 

(1)Excludes capital expenditures related to Pumpco of $36.7 million, $108.1 millionhighest combined compensation and $99.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Geographic Segments

The Company attributes revenue to various countries based on the location where services are performed or the destinationparticipation alignment of the drilling products or equipment sold or rented. Long-lived assets consist primarilyparticipant with the second highest combined compensation of property, plant and equipment and are attributed to various countries based onall the physical locationparticipants as of the assetdate of the change of control may not exceed the percentage that is equal to (1/n)% +12%, where n is the number of participants as of the date of the change of control. If necessary, the participation alignment of the participant with the highest combined compensation as of the date of the change of control will be decreased and the participation alignments of each of the other participants increased on a pro rata basis so that (1) the rule contained in the preceding sentence is respected and (2) the sum of the participation alignments of all participants is equal to 100% (effectively capping the highest paid NEO’s benefit).

Equity Awards
Upon the termination of an NEO’s employment due to retirement, death or disability or a termination without cause by the Company, accelerated vesting of NEO equity awards will only occur upon (1) the retirement, death or disability of the NEO prior to the end of the applicable performance period; or (2) termination of the NEO’s employment (i) by the Company without cause or (ii) by the NEO for good cause as defined in the employment agreement, if termination under (i) or (ii) occurs after a change of control.
Except as otherwise noted, the following table quantifies the potential payments to our NEOs under their employment arrangements and our Change of Control Severance Plan discussed above, for various scenarios involving a change of control or termination of employment of each of our NEOs in such position at the end of the year, assuming a period.December 31, 2019 termination date and where applicable, using the closing price of our common stock of $5.01 (as reported on the NYSE as of December 31, 2019). Excluded are benefits provided to all employees, such as accrued vacation and benefits provided by third parties under our life and other insurance policies. Also excluded are benefits our NEOs would receive upon termination of employment under the SERP and the NQDC Plan, as described above, as well as benefits under our 401(k) plan. The Company’s revenue attributedtable also assumes the following:
the number of participants in the Change of Control Severance Plan is six;
the transaction value on December 31, 2019 is $1.2 billion (estimated value assumes equity based on our December 29, 2019 closing stock price plus all outstanding debt reflected on the December 31, 2019 balance sheet); and
the corresponding sharing pool is $14,791,149.
24

                             
Name
 
Lump Sum
Severance
Payment
  
Outstanding
Unvested
Options
  
Outstanding
RSUs
  
Outstanding
PSUs
  
Health
Benefits
  
Tax
Gross-Up
  
Total
 
                             
David D. Dunlap
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
177,219
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
177,219
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
5,525,000
   
n/a
  $
177,219
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
5,769,171
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
5,525,000
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
5,591,952
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
5,525,000
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
5,591,952
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
3,515,922
   
n/a
  $
177,219
  $
11,801,400
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
15,561,493
 
                             
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
58,231
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
58,231
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
4,465,809
   
n/a
  $
58,231
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,501,183
 
Termination – No Cause
  
4,465,809
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,442,952
 
Termination – Good Reason
  
4,465,809
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,442,952
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
4,465,809
   
n/a
  $
58,231
  $
3,831,800
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
8,422,792
 
                             
Brian K. Moore
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
    
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
52,314
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
52,314
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
2,434,336
   
n/a
  $
52,314
   
(2
) $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
2,532,074
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
2,434,336
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
2,479,760
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
2,434,336
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
2,479,760
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
2,216,829
   
n/a
  $
52,314
  $
3,484,400
  $
45,424
   
n/a
  $
5,798,967
 
                             
A. Patrick Bernard
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
37,074
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
37,074
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
1,671,908
   
n/a
  $
37,074
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
1,775,934
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
1,671,908
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
1,738,860
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
1,671,908
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
1,738,860
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
1,247,846
   
n/a
  $
37,074
  $
2,469,400
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
3,821,272
 
                             
William B. Masters
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
44,519
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
44,519
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
2,039,433
   
n/a
  $
44,519
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,150,904
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
2,039,433
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,106,385
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
2,039,433
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
2,106,385
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
3,620,362
   
n/a
  $
44,519
  $
2,938,600
  $
66,952
   
n/a
  $
6,670,433
 
                             
James W. Spexarth
                     
Retirement
  
n/a
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
   
—  
 
Death
  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
36,944
   
(2
)  
n/a
   
n/a
  $
36,944
 
Disability/Incapacity
 $
1,539,720
   
n/a
  $
36,944
   
(2
) $
67,655
   
n/a
  $
1,644,319
 
Termination – No Cause
 $
1,539,720
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
67,655
   
n/a
  $
1,607,375
 
Termination – Good Reason
 $
1,539,720
   
n/a
   
n/a
   
(2
) $
67.655
   
n/a
  $
1,607,375
 
Termination in connection with Change of Control
(1)
 $
2,956,932
   
n/a
  $
36,944
  $
2,236,400
  $
67,655
   
n/a
  $
5,297,931
 
(1)Certain of the benefits described in the table would be achieved in the event of a change of control alone and would not require a termination of the NEO’s employment. In particular, pursuant to the terms of our incentive award plans and the individual award agreements, upon a change of control as defined in the plans, (i) all outstanding stock options would immediately vest, (ii) all restrictions on outstanding RSUs would lapse and (iii) all outstanding PSUs would be paid out as if the maximum level of performance had been achieved. In addition to the amounts set forth in the table above, upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change of control, each NEO is also entitled to outplacement assistance of up to $10,000.
The total cash severance due to a change of control for our CEO, Mr. Dunlap, is less than 2x the U.S.sum of his base salary identified in the Summary Compensation Table and his target bonus in 2019. The lump sum severance payment due to other countrieseach NEO would consist of the following:
25

                 
Name
 
Change of
Control
Severance Plan
Payment
  
Target Bonus
Payment
  
Total Cash
Severance
Payment
  
Total Cash
Severance
Multiple of Base
Salary + Target
Bonus
 
David D. Dunlap
 $
2,240,922
  $
1,275,000
  $
3,515,922
   
1.7x
 
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
 $
3,990,609
  $
475,200
  $
4,465,809
   
4.7x
 
Brian K. Moore
 $
1,740,000
  $
476,829
  $
2,216,829
   
2.3x
 
A. Patrick Bernard
 $
927,693
  $
320,153
  $
1,247,846
   
1.8x
 
William B. Masters
 $
3,229,832
  $
390,530
  $
3,620,362
   
4.4x
 
James W. Spexarth
 $
2,662,091
  $
294,840
  $
2,956,931
   
4.8
 
(2)Pursuant to the terms of the PSU award agreements, if an NEO’s employment terminates prior to the end of the applicable performance period as a result of retirement, death, disability, or termination for any reason other than the voluntary termination by the NEO or termination by the Company for cause, then the NEO retains a
pro-rata
portion of the NEO’s then-outstanding PSUs based on the NEO’s employment during the performance period and the remaining units will be forfeited. The retained units will be valued and paid out to the NEO in accordance with their original payment schedule based on the Company’s achievement of the applicable performance criteria. Upon a voluntary termination by the NEO or a termination by the Company for cause, all outstanding units are forfeited.
CEO Pay Ratio
The following is a reasonable estimate of the pay ratio of our median compensated employee compared to our CEO based on the “2019 Summary Compensation Table” data and real pay data which includes salary, payouts from the AIP, PSUs and the value of its long-lived assets by those locations is as follows (in thousands): 

Revenues

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

United States

$

1,038,870

$

1,137,070

$

997,713

Other countries

386,499

341,787

307,816

Total

$

1,425,369

$

1,478,857

$

1,305,529

Long-Lived Assets

December 31,

2019

2018

United States

$

489,189

$

903,520

Other countries

175,760

205,606

Total

$

664,949

$

1,109,126

(9) Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined asvested RSUs (valuing the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs used in determining fair value are characterized according to a hierarchy that prioritizes those inputsshares based on the degreeclosing price at

year-end)
and the gain on the exercise of any stock options:
CEO Pay Ratio
Compensation Table Pay
Real Pay
Pay Ratio
50:1
31:1
In 2019, there were no meaningful changes to which they are observable. The three input levels ofour employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would have significantly impacted the fair value hierarchy areCEO pay ratio disclosure. As a result, our median compensated employee remained the same as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted pricesidentified in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;

58


Table of Contents

2019 as allowed by the SEC rules.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets or model-derived valuations or other inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions aboutTo summarize the inputsmethodology we used in pricingidentifying the asset or liability.

The following tables provide a summarymedian compensated employee in 2018, we consistently applied the compensation measure of the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): 

Fair Value at December 31, 2019

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Intangible and other long-term assets, net:

Non-qualified deferred compensation assets

$

-

$

15,499

$

-

$

15,499

Accounts payable:

Non-qualified deferred compensation liabilities

$

-

$

1,372

$

-

$

1,372

Other long-term liabilities:

Non-qualified deferred compensation liabilities

$

-

$

23,466

$

-

$

23,466

Total debt

$

1,021,300

$

-

$

-

$

1,021,300

Fair Value at December 31, 2018

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Intangible and other long-term assets, net:

Non-qualified deferred compensation assets

$

376

$

12,930

$

-

$

13,306

Accounts payable:

Non-qualified deferred compensation liabilities

$

-

$

1,138

$

-

$

1,138

Other long-term liabilities:

Non-qualified deferred compensation liabilities

$

-

$

19,766

$

-

$

19,766

Total debt

$

1,084,711

$

-

$

-

$

1,084,711

The Company’s non-qualified deferredtotal taxable compensation plans allow officers, certain highly compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation and contribute such amounts to one or more hypothetical investment funds (see note 6). The Company entered into separate trust agreements, subject to general creditors, to segregate assets of each plan and reports the accounts of the trusts in its consolidated financial statements. These investments are reported at fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identifiable assets and observable inputs for similar assets and liabilities, which represent Levels 1 and 2, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying amount of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, as reflected in the consolidated balance sheets, approximates fair value due to the short maturities. The fair value of the debt instruments is determined by reference to the market value of the instrument as quoted in an over-the-counter market.

The following table reflects the fair value measurements used in testing the impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

Impairment

Fair Value

Impairment

Fair Value

Goodwill

$

-

$

-

$

251,826

$

-

Intangible assets

$

7,556

$

-

$

21,689

$

-

Property, plant and equipment, net

$

9,629

$

25,000

$

49,198

$

65,441

Fair value is measured as of the impairment date using Level 3 inputs. See note 11 for discussion of reduction in value of assets recorded during 2019 and 2018.

(10) Contingencies

Due to the nature of the Company’s business, the Company is involved, from time to time, in routine litigation or subject to disputes or claims regarding its business activities. Legal costs related to these matters are expensed as incurred. However, based on current circumstances, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, after considering available defensesincluded base salary, overtime, bonuses, long-term incentives and any insurance coverage or indemnification rights, will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, resultsother type of operations or cash flows. 

A subsidiary of the Company is involved in legal proceedings with 2 employees regarding the payment of royalties for a patentable product developed by them. On April 2, 2018, the employees filed a lawsuit in the Harris County District Court alleging that the royalty payments they had received since 2010 should have been higher. In May 2019, the jury issued a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. On October 25, 2019, the court issued a final judgment against the Company. The Company strongly disagrees with the verdict and believes the district court committed several legal errors that should result in a reversal or remand of the case by the Court of Appeals. The ultimate resolution of this matter could result in a loss of up to $7.4 million in excess of amounts accrued.

(11) Reduction in Value of Assets

During 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $17.2 million, $322.7 million and $10.4 million in expense related to reduction in value of assets, respectively. The components of the reductions in value of assets are as follows (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Reduction in value of goodwill

$

-

$

251,826

$

-

Reduction in value of long-lived assets

17,185

70,887

10,390

Total reduction in value of assets

$

17,185

$

322,713

$

10,390

Reduction in Value of Long-Lived Assets

During 2019, the Company recorded $17.2 million in connection with the reduction in value of its long-lived assets. The reduction in value of assets was primarily related to reduction in value of certain intangibles in the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment and long-lived assets in the Technical Solutions segment.

During 2018, the Company recorded $70.9 million in connection with the reduction in value of its long-lived assets. The reduction in value of assets was comprised of $41.4 million and $19.8 million related to property, plant and equipment and intangibles, respectively, in the well servicing rigs business in the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment and $5.1 million related to property, plant and equipment and $1.9 million related to intangibles in the Production Services segment. The reduction in value of assets recorded during 2018 was primarily driven by the decline in demand for these services and the forecast did not indicate a timely recovery sufficient to support the carrying values of these assets. In addition, the Company recorded a $2.6 million reduction in carrying value of its former corporate facility and its related assets.

During 2017, the Company recorded $10.4 million in connection with the reduction in value of its long-lived assets. The reduction in value of assets was comprised of $8.1 million related to property, plant and equipment in the Technical Solutions segment and $2.3 million related to property, plant and equipment primarily in the Drilling Products and Services segment.

Reduction in Value of Goodwill

During 2018, the Company recorded a $251.8 million reduction in value of goodwill relating to its Onshore Completion and Workover Services and Production Services segments. The Company determined that the fair value of its goodwill for the Onshore Completion and Workover Services segment was less than its carrying value and fully wrote-off the related goodwill balances.

(12) Discontinued Operations

On December 10, 2019, the Company’s indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, Pumpco, completed its existing hydraulic fracturing field operations and determined to discontinue, wind down and exit its hydraulic fracturing operations. The Company intends to maintain an adequate number of employees to efficiently wind down Pumpco’s business. The financial results of Pumpco’s operations have historically been included in the Company’s Onshore Completions and Workover Services segment. The Company intends to sell Pumpco’s fixed assets over time during the next twelve months.

The following table summarizes the components of loss from discontinued operations, net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Revenues

$

281,452

$

651,408

$

568,547

Cost of services

272,248

531,616

508,886

Loss from discontinued operations before tax

(169,582)

(433,142)

(84,813)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax

(177,968)

(430,712)

(25,606)

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, loss from discontinued operations included $0.7 million and $18.9 million, respectively, related to the Company’s former subsea construction business, which was wound down in 2018.

The following summarizes the assets and liabilities related to the business reported as discontinued operations (in thousands):

December 31,

2019

2018

Current assets:

Accounts receivable, net

$

25,106

$

98,003

Other current assets

6,215

21,474

Total current assets

$

31,321

$

119,477

Property, plant and equipment, net

179,144

248,874

Operating lease ROU assets

5,732

-

Intangible and other assets

-

67,421

Total assets

$

216,197

$

435,772

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

14,370

$

60,576

Accrued expenses

24,751

12,073

Total current liabilities

39,121

72,649

Operating lease liabilities

5,415

-

Other long-term liabilities

402

848

Total liabilities

$

44,938

$

73,497

Significant operating non-cash items of Pumpco and cash flows from investing activities were as follows (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

$

75,077

$

122,409

$

111,860

Reduction in value of assets

76,577

417,011

3,765

Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:

Payments for capital expenditures

$

(36,743)

$

(108,094)

$

(99,544)

Proceeds from sales of assets

1,669

-

5,262

(13) Supplemental Guarantor Information

SESI, L.L.C. (the Issuer), a 100% owned subsidiary of Superior Energy Services, Inc. (Parent), has $500 million of 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2024. The Parent, along with certain of its 100% owned domestic subsidiaries, fully and unconditionally guaranteed the senior unsecured notes, and such guarantees are joint and several.

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

-

$

210,691 

$

612 

$

61,321 

$

-

$

272,624 

Accounts receivable, net

-

750 

245,941

85,356 

-

332,047

Income taxes receivable

-

(1,080)

-

1,820 

-

740 

Other current assets

-

9,594 

106,857 

50,310 

-

166,761 

Assets held for sale

-

-

216,197 

-

-

216,197 

Total current assets

-

219,955 

569,607

198,807 

-

988,369

Property, plant and equipment, net

-

11,129 

497,395 

156,425 

-

664,949 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

-

22,052 

44,048 

14,806 

-

80,906 

Goodwill

-

-

80,544 

57,151 

-

137,695 

Notes receivable

-

-

68,092 

-

-

68,092 

Long-term intercompany accounts receivable

2,260,980 

1,281,183 

3,020,808 

202,331 

(6,765,302)

-

Intercompany notes receivable

-

-

-

9,400 

(9,400)

-

Equity investments of consolidated subsidiaries

(2,207,117)

3,498,602

10,449 

-

(1,301,934)

-

Restricted cash

-

-

2,719 

45 

-

2,764 

Intangible and other long-term assets, net

-

19,466 

24,313 

6,676 

-

50,455 

Total assets

$

53,863

$

5,052,387

$

4,317,975

$

645,641 

$

(8,076,636)

$

1,993,230

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

-

$

10,701 

$

49,159 

$

33,106 

$

-

$

92,966 

Accrued expenses

-

76,249 

80,696 

25,989 

-

182,934 

Income taxes payable

-

-

-

-

-

-

Current portion of decommissioning liabilities

-

-

-

3,649 

-

3,649 

Liabilities held for sale

-

-

44,938 

-

-

44,938 

Total current liabilities

-

86,950 

174,793 

62,744 

-

324,487 

Long-term debt, net

-

1,286,629 

-

-

-

1,286,629 

Deferred income taxes

-

3,247 

-

-

-

3,247 

Decommissioning liabilities

-

-

132,632 

-

-

132,632 

Operating lease liabilities

-

22,738 

29,206 

10,410 

-

62,354 

Long-term intercompany accounts payable

4,290 

5,805,516 

832,407 

123,089 

(6,765,302)

-

Intercompany notes payable

-

9,400 

-

-

(9,400)

-

Other long-term liabilities

-

45,024 

75,976 

13,308 

-

134,308 

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)

49,573

(2,207,117)

3,072,961

436,090 

(1,301,934)

49,573

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$

53,863

$

5,052,387

$

4,317,975

$

645,641 

$

(8,076,636)

$

1,993,230

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

-

$

102,224 

$

707 

$

55,119 

$

-

$

158,050 

Accounts receivable, net

-

160 

367,497 

79,696 

-

447,353 

Intercompany accounts receivable

-

12,279 

74,906 

3,489 

(90,674)

-

Other current assets

-

12,805 

111,560 

43,137 

-

167,502 

Total current assets

-

127,468 

554,670 

181,441 

(90,674)

772,905 

Property, plant and equipment, net

-

10,129 

920,978 

178,019 

-

1,109,126 

Goodwill

-

-

80,544 

56,244 

-

136,788 

Notes receivable

-

-

63,993 

-

-

63,993 

Long-term intercompany accounts receivable

2,243,431 

-

1,991,912 

182,284 

(4,417,627)

-

Equity investments of consolidated subsidiaries

(1,952,647)

3,754,887 

5,992 

-

(1,808,232)

-

Restricted cash

-

-

5,653 

45 

-

5,698 

Intangible and other long-term assets, net

-

19,255 

100,847 

7,350 

-

127,452 

Total assets

$

290,784 

$

3,911,739 

$

3,724,589 

$

605,383 

$

(6,316,533)

$

2,215,962 

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

-

$

8,807 

$

109,903 

$

20,615 

$

-

$

139,325 

Accrued expenses

45 

102,845 

86,926 

29,364 

-

219,180 

Income taxes payable

-

1,237 

-

(503)

-

734 

Intercompany accounts payable

-

724 

6,869 

83,081 

(90,674)

-

Current portion of decommissioning liabilities

-

-

-

3,538 

-

3,538 

Total current liabilities

45 

113,613 

203,698 

136,095 

(90,674)

362,777 

Long-term debt, net

-

1,282,921 

-

-

-

1,282,921 

Decommissioning liabilities

-

-

126,558 

-

-

126,558 

Long-term intercompany accounts payable

-

4,417,627 

-

-

(4,417,627)

-

Other long-term liabilities

-

50,225 

76,543 

26,199 

-

152,967 

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)

290,739 

(1,952,647)

3,317,790 

443,089 

(1,808,232)

290,739 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$

290,784 

$

3,911,739 

$

3,724,589 

$

605,383 

$

(6,316,533)

$

2,215,962 


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Revenues

$

-

$

-

$

1,126,456

324,200 

(25,287)

$

1,425,369

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation,

depletion, amortization and accretion)

-

(7,023)

730,473 

226,919 

(25,287)

925,082 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and

accretion

-

3,682 

154,424 

38,353 

-

196,459 

General and administrative expenses

-

87,727 

134,123 

46,376 

-

268,226 

Reduction in value of assets

-

-

14,900 

2,285 

-

17,185 

Income (loss) from operations

-

(84,386)

92,536

10,267 

-

18,417

Other income (expense):

Interest income (expense), net

-

(103,397)

5,115 

(30)

-

(98,312)

Intercompany interest income (expense)

-

(107)

-

107 

-

-

Other income (expense)

-

(1,732)

(759)

-

(2,484)

Equity in losses of consolidated subsidiaries

(255,721)

(107,768)

3,333 

-

360,156

-

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

(255,721)

(297,390)

100,225

10,351 

360,156

(82,379)

Income taxes

-

(41,669)

47,771 

(10,728)

-

(4,626)

Net loss from continuing operations

(255,721)

(255,721)

52,454

21,079 

360,156

(77,753)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

-

-

(177,968)

-

-

(177,968)

Net income (loss)

$

(255,721)

$

(255,721)

$

(125,514)

$

21,079 

$

360,156

$

(255,721)

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Year Ended December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Net income (loss)

$

(255,721)

$

(255,721)

$

(125,514)

$

21,079 

$

360,156

$

(255,721)

Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax

1,250 

1,250 

-

1,250 

(2,500)

1,250 

Comprehensive loss

$

(254,471)

$

(254,471)

$

(125,514)

$

22,329 

$

357,656

$

(254,471)


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Revenues

$

-

$

-

$

1,238,343 

$

271,769 

$

(31,255)

$

1,478,857 

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation,

depletion, amortization and accretion)

-

(13,265)

823,908 

191,100 

(31,255)

970,488 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and

accretion

-

3,945 

229,565 

44,929 

-

278,439 

General and administrative expenses

-

95,725 

129,667 

51,076 

-

276,468 

Reduction in value of assets

-

-

230,429 

92,284 

-

322,713 

Loss from operations

-

(86,405)

(175,226)

(107,620)

-

(369,251)

Other income (expense):

Interest expense, net

-

(103,594)

3,950 

167 

-

(99,477)

Other income (expense)

-

71 

1,014 

(2,763)

-

(1,678)

Equity in losses of consolidated subsidiaries

(858,115)

(707,348)

(597)

-

1,566,060 

-

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

(858,115)

(897,276)

(170,859)

(110,216)

1,566,060 

(470,406)

Income taxes

-

(39,161)

(4,124)

282 

-

(43,003)

Net loss from continuing operations

(858,115)

(858,115)

(166,735)

(110,498)

1,566,060 

(427,403)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

-

-

(429,983)

(729)

-

(430,712)

Net loss

$

(858,115)

$

(858,115)

$

(596,718)

$

(111,227)

$

1,566,060 

$

(858,115)

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Year Ended December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Net income (loss)

$

(858,115)

$

(858,115)

$

(596,718)

$

(111,227)

$

1,566,060 

$

(858,115)

Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax

(5,750)

(5,750)

-

(5,750)

11,500 

(5,750)

Comprehensive income (loss)

$

(863,865)

$

(863,865)

$

(596,718)

$

(116,977)

$

1,577,560 

$

(863,865)

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2017

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Revenues

$

-

$

-

$

1,086,567 

$

234,663 

$

(15,701)

$

1,305,529 

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation,

depletion, amortization and accretion)

-

(4,123)

733,600 

176,033 

(15,701)

889,809 

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and

accretion

-

4,149 

271,853 

50,854 

-

326,856 

General and administrative expenses

-

86,840 

142,166 

56,591 

-

285,597 

Reduction in value of assets

-

-

2,273 

8,117 

-

10,390 

Income (loss) from operations

-

(86,866)

(63,325)

(56,932)

-

(207,123)

Other income (expense):

Interest income (expense), net

-

(105,585)

4,451 

(321)

-

(101,455)

Other income (expense)

-

(1,350)

202 

(2,151)

-

(3,299)

Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries

(205,921)

(76,394)

(964)

-

283,279 

-

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

(205,921)

(270,195)

(59,636)

(59,404)

283,279 

(311,877)

Income taxes

-

(64,274)

(59,169)

(8,119)

-

(131,562)

Net loss from continuing operations

(205,921)

(205,921)

(467)

(51,285)

283,279 

(180,315)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax

-

-

(6,696)

(18,910)

-

(25,606)

Net income (loss)

$

(205,921)

$

(205,921)

$

(7,163)

$

(70,195)

$

283,279 

$

(205,921)

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Year Ended December 31, 2017

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Net income (loss)

$

(205,921)

$

(205,921)

$

(7,163)

$

(70,195)

$

283,279 

$

(205,921)

Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax

12,821 

12,821 

-

12,821 

(25,642)

12,821 

Comprehensive income (loss)

$

(193,100)

$

(193,100)

$

(7,163)

$

(57,374)

$

257,637 

$

(193,100)


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$

18,408 

$

(12,879)

$

128,409 

$

12,490 

$

146,428 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments for capital expenditures

-

(6,173)

(112,994)

(21,298)

(140,465)

Proceeds from sales of assets

-

-

110,008 

-

110,008 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

-

(6,173)

(2,986)

(21,298)

(30,457)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Purchases of treasury stock

(4,290)

-

-

-

(4,290)

Changes in notes with affiliated companies, net

(13,259)

127,661 

(128,452)

14,050 

-

Other

(859)

(143)

-

-

(1,002)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(18,408)

127,518 

(128,452)

14,050 

(5,292)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

-

-

-

961 

961 

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

-

108,466 

(3,029)

6,203 

111,640 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

-

102,224 

6,360 

55,164 

163,748 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

$

-

$

210,690 

$

3,331 

$

61,367 

$

275,388 


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$

23,866 

$

(2,013)

$

150,510 

$

(4,023)

$

(3,283)

$

165,057 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments for capital expenditures

-

(2,055)

(207,640)

(11,675)

-

(221,370)

Proceeds from sales of assets

-

-

20,003 

13,296 

-

33,299 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

-

(2,055)

(187,637)

1,621 

-

(188,071)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Intercompany dividends

-

-

-

(3,283)

3,283 

-

Changes in notes with affiliated companies, net

(21,734)

(19,787)

22,564 

18,957 

-

-

Other

(2,132)

(454)

-

-

-

(2,586)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(23,866)

(20,241)

22,564 

15,674 

3,283 

(2,586)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

-

-

-

(3,135)

-

(3,135)

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

-

(24,309)

(14,563)

10,137 

-

(28,735)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

-

126,533 

20,923 

45,027 

-

192,483 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

$

-

$

102,224 

$

6,360 

$

55,164 

$

-

$

163,748 


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2017

(in thousands)

Parent

Issuer

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$

26,221 

$

3,369 

$

89,739 

$

(22,903)

$

96,426 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments for capital expenditures

-

(1,041)

(148,738)

(15,154)

(164,933)

Other

-

-

23,485 

4,784 

28,269 

Net cash used in investing activities

-

(1,041)

(125,253)

(10,370)

(136,664)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

-

500,000 

-

-

500,000 

Principal payments on long-term debt

-

(500,000)

-

-

(500,000)

Payment of debt issuance costs

-

(11,967)

-

-

(11,967)

Changes in notes with affiliated companies, net

(21,163)

8,727 

4,648 

7,788 

-

Other

(5,058)

-

-

-

(5,058)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(26,221)

(3,240)

4,648 

7,788 

(17,025)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

-

-

-

3,654 

3,654 

Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

-

(912)

(30,866)

(21,831)

(53,609)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

-

127,445 

51,789 

66,858 

246,092 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

$

-

$

126,533 

$

20,923 

$

45,027 

$

192,483 

(14) Interim Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of consolidated interim financial information (in thousands):

2019

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

Revenues

$

365,274

$

367,438

$

356,585

$

336,072

Less:

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation,

depletion, amortization and accretion)

240,053

229,532

231,927

223,570

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

56,343

51,271

45,104

43,741

Gross profit

68,878

86,635

79,554

68,761

Reduction in value of assets

-

7,557

9,628

-

Loss from continuing operations

(32,644)

(18,441)

(20,506)

(6,162)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

(15,061)

(52,609)

(17,936)

(92,362)

Net loss

$

(47,705)

$

(71,050)

$

(38,442)

$

(98,524)

Loss per share from continuing operations:

Basic and diluted

$

(2.10)

$

(1.18)

$

(1.31)

$

(0.42)

Loss per share from discontinued operations:

Basic and diluted

$

(0.97)

$

(3.37)

$

(1.15)

$

(6.26)

2018

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

Revenues

$

354,109

$

356,901

$

378,400

$

389,447

Less:

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation,

depletion, amortization and accretion)

240,583

235,679

245,832

248,394

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

75,761

67,862

69,338

65,478

Gross profit

37,765

53,360

63,230

75,575

Reduction in value of assets

-

-

-

322,713

Loss from continuing operations

(53,136)

(33,817)

(23,436)

(317,014)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

(6,588)

7,427

1,620

(433,171)

Net loss

$

(59,724)

$

(26,390)

$

(21,816)

$

(750,185)

Loss per share from continuing operations:

Basic and diluted

$

(3.45)

$

(2.19)

$

(1.52)

$

(20.51)

Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations:

Basic and diluted

$

(0.43)

$

0.48

$

0.10

$

(28.03)

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Our management has established and maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed, accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures. Management’s report and the independent registered public accounting firm’s attestation report are included herein under the captions “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” and are incorporated herein by reference.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over our financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.  Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 

Our system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.  Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of internal control.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based upon criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Based on this assessment, our management determined that as of December 31, 2019, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by KPMG, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Superior Energy Services, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.taxable compensation. In our opinion, the Company maintained, inanalysis, we included all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issuedpart-time and full-time U.S. and

non-U.S.
employees who were employed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20192018. The 5% de minimis exception was applied, allowing the exclusion of

non-U.S.
employees if they account for 5% or less of our total employees.
Non-U.S.
employees were excluded under the 5% de minimis exception from Indonesia, Trinidad and 2018,Tobago, India and Colombia. The exclusion of
non-U.S.
employees represented less than 5% of our total number of employees. Given that we have global operations and employees located in many locations, pay and reporting systems and pay practices vary depending on the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity,region. As a result, assumptions, adjustments and cash flows for eachestimates were consistently applied to identify the annual total taxable compensation of the yearsmedian compensated employee. In addition, anomalies related to compensation were excluded as allowed by the SEC. We selected December 31, 2018 as the date to identify our median compensated employee. Based on the methodology described above, our median compensated employee is an hourly field training employee who has worked for our Company for eight years.
In 2019, our median compensated employee earned an annual total compensation of $99,759. Our CEO’s compensation reflected in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, andSummary Compensation was $5,030,500. As a result, the related notes and financial statement schedule II (collectively, the consolidated financial statements),pay ratio between our CEO’s total annual compensation and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

median compensated employee’s total annual compensation was 50:1 in 2019. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reportingpay ratio between our CEO’s real pay and for its assessmentour median compensated employee’s real pay was 31:1 in 2019.

26

2019 Director Compensation
In 2019, directors maintained the 15% reduction of the effectivenessannual retainer paid to
non-management
directors that was implemented in 2016 to show alignment with management. During 2019, our
non-management
directors received:
an annual retainer of internal control over financial reporting,$175,000;
an additional annual fee of $20,000 for the chair of the Audit Committee;
an additional annual fee of $15,000 for the chair of the Compensation Committee;
an additional annual fee of $10,000 for the chair of the Corporate Governance Committee;
an additional annual fee of $25,000 for the Lead Director; and
an additional annual fee of $125,000 for the
non-executive
chairman of the Board.
In 2019,
non-management
directors’ compensation included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinionRSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately $82,000. The RSUs are granted on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registeredday following each Annual Meeting, with the PCAOBnumber of RSUs granted determined by dividing $82,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the day of the Annual Meeting and are required to be independent with respectrounding up to the Company in accordance withnext whole RSU. In addition, if the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulationsdirector’s initial election or appointment does not occur at an Annual Meeting, then he or she will receive a pro rata number of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal controlRSUs based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary innumber of full calendar months between the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitationsdate of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingelection or appointment and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositionsfirst anniversary of the assetsprevious Annual Meeting.

The RSUs vest and pay out in shares of our common stock on the date of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods arenext year’s Annual Meeting, subject to the riskapplicable director’s continued service through the date and further subject to each director’s ability to elect to defer receipt of the shares of our common stock under the NQDC Plan.

Under our NQDC Plan,
non-management
directors may elect to defer compensation received from the Company for service on our Board. Deferred cash compensation will earn a rate of return based on hypothetical investments in certain mutual funds from which the director may select, or may be converted to deferred RSUs. Any deferred RSUs will be paid out in shares of our common stock and will be credited with dividend equivalents for any dividends paid on our common stock. Director participants may elect the timing of the distributions of their deferred compensation, which may be made in a lump sum payment or installments, provided that controls may become inadequate becauseall payments are made no later than 10 years following the director’s termination of changesservice on our Board.
The table below summarizes the compensation of our
non-management
directors for 2019. As CEO and President, Mr. Dunlap does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. His compensation as an executive is reflected in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

February 28, 2020

“Item 11. Executive Compensation—2019 Executive Compensation—2019 Summary Compensation Table.” All
non-management
directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
                 
Name
 
Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash
(1)
  
Stock Awards
(2)
  
All Other
Compensation
  
Total
 
James M. Funk
 $
162,500
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
244,500
 
Terence E. Hall
 $
262,500
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
344,500
 
Peter D. Kinnear
 $
141,667
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
223,667
 
Janiece M. Longoria
 $
143,333
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
225,333
 
Michael M. McShane
 $
149,167
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
231,167
 
W. Matt Ralls
 $
152,500
  $
82,000
  $
0
  $
234,500
 

72

(1)Amounts shown reflect fees earned by the directors as retainers or fees for their service on our Board during 2019.
(2)Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 at the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. On June 7, 2019, each
non-employee
director received an award of 50,000 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $1.64 per unit.
27

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information relating to our executive officers is included in “Executive Officers of Registrant” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference. Information relating to Our Shared Core Values at Work (Code of Conduct) that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our senior financial officers, is included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference. Other information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and ManagementManagement and Related Stockholder Matters

Information required

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
All of our equity compensation plans have been previously approved by this item will be containedour stockholders. There are no securities issued under equity compensation plans that have not been previously approved by our stockholders.
Principal Stockholders
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by holders as of June 1, 2020, known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. The information in the table is based on our definitive proxy statementreview of filings with the SEC.
         
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  
Percent of Class(1)
 
LJH, Ltd.
377 Neva Lane
Denison, Texas 750200019
  
2,382,000
(2)   
15.07
%
         
Warlander Asset Management, LP
250 West 55
th
Street, 33
rd
Floor
New York, New York 10019
  
1,099,999
(3)   
6.96
%
         
Monarch Alternative Capital LP
535 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022
  
1,136,498
(4)   
7.19
%
         
Aristeia Capital, L.L.C.
One Greenwich Plaza, 3
rd
Floor
Greenwich, CT 06830
  
951,914
(5)   
6.02
%
         
Madison Avenue Partners, LP
150 East 58
th
Street, 14
th
Floor
New York, New York, 10155
  
793,858
(6)   
5.02
%
(1)Based on 15,798,919 shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 1, 2020.
(2)In the Schedule 13D/A filed on October 18, 2019, LJH, Ltd. reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
(3)In the Schedule 13G filed on January 10, 2020, Warlander Asset Management, LP reported that it has the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the shared power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
(4)In the Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 2020, The Monarch Alternative Capital LP reported that it has the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the shared power to vote or direct the vote of all shares reported.
(5)In the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2020, Aristeia Capital, L.L.C. reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
(6)In the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2020, Madison Avenue Partners, LP reported that it has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of all the shares reported.
28

Management and Director Stock Ownership
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of June 1, 2020, by our current (i)
 non-management
directors, (ii) NEOs, and (iii) directors and executive officers as a group. The information in the table is based on our review of filings with the SEC. Each person listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.

the shares beneficially owned unless otherwise stated.

         
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
(1)
  
Percent of
Class
(2)
 
NON-MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS
      
James M. Funk
  
28,734
   
*
 
Terence E. Hall
  
106,560
   
*
 
Peter D. Kinnear
  
67,746
   
*
 
Janiece M. Longoria
  
1,018
   
*
 
Michael M. McShane
  
115,763
   
*
 
W. Matt Ralls
  
7,286
   
*
 
         
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
      
David D. Dunlap
  
336,858
   
2.13
%
Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.
  
129,256
   
*
 
Brian K. Moore
  
203,759
   
1.29
%
A. Patrick Bernard
  
54,277
   
*
 
William B. Masters
  
63,533
   
*
 
James W. Spexarth
  
19,880
   
*
 
         
ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (12 Persons)
(3)
  
1,134670
   
7.18
%
*Less than 1%.
(1)Includes the number of shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Dunlap (199,808); Mr. Ballard (35,846); Mr. Moore (62,550); Mr. Bernard (42,082); Mr. Masters (41,415) and Mr. Spexarth (3,952). The total number of shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days for all directors and executive officers as a group is 385,653.
(2)Based on 15,798,919 shares of our common stock outstanding as of June1, 2020.
(3)Includes stock beneficially owned by all directors and executive officers.
Item 13. Certain RelationshipsRelationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information

Certain Transactions
Our practice has been that any transaction which would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation
S-K
of the rules and regulations of the SEC, with respect to a director or executive officer, must be reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and investigates any matters pertaining to the integrity of our executive officers and directors, including conflicts of interest, or adherence to standards of business conduct required by our policies. We are currently not a party to any transactions requiring a disclosure.
Director Independence
The Board has also affirmatively determined that each member of our standing committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee) has no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria applicable to the Audit and Compensation Committees) set forth in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.
29

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered to KPMG LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for 2019, 2018 and 2017, and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG LLP:
             
 
Fiscal Year Ended December 31
 
 
2019
  
2018
  
2017
 
Audit Fees(1)
 $
3,973,630
  $
3,254,470
  $
3,201,583
 
Audit-Related Fees(2)
 $
200,000
  $
0
  $
160,000
 
Tax Fees(3)
 $
25,827
  $
122,161
  $
170,735
 
All Other Fees
 $
0
  $
0
  $
0
 
(1)Audit fees were for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements, for the audit of internal controls over financial reporting and for services normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Audit fees for professional services related to SEC filings for debt offering.
(3)Reflects fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning, statutory reporting and other international, federal and state projects.
Pre-Approval
Process
The Audit Committee must
pre-approve
all audit and permissible
non-audit
services provided by the independent auditor and follows established approval procedures to ensure that the independent auditor’s independence will not be impaired. If services require specific
pre-approval,
the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) submits requests along with a joint statement from the independent auditor as to whether, in the CAO’s view, the request for services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee delegated
pre-approval
authority for audit, audit-related, tax services and other services that may be performed by the independent auditor in the
pre-approval
policy to its chair and any
pre-approval
decisions are presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate to management its responsibility to
pre-approve
services to be performed by the Company’s independent auditor.
All audit and tax fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee before services were rendered.
30

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this item will be containedreport.
1.
Financial Statements.
The financial statements and report of the independent registered public accounting firm have been included in Part II, Item 8 of our definitive proxyAnnual Report on Form
10-K
filed on February 28, 2020.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules.
All financial statement schedules have been included in Part IV, Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K
filed on February 28, 2020 or they are either inapplicable or not required, or the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits.
See Item 15(b) below. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

has been identified.
(b) Exhibits.

(1)

Exhibit No.

Financial Statements

Description

The following financial statements are included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Audit of Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

2.1

(2)

Financial Statement Schedule

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)

Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 18, 2019, by and among Superior Energy Services, Inc., New NAM, Inc., Forbes Energy Services Ltd. Spieth Newco, Inc., Spieth Merger Sub, Inc. and Fowler Merger Sub, Inc.

(incorporated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2019 (File No. 001-34037))..

2.2

2.2

3.1

3.1

3.2

3.2

4.1

4.1

4.2

4.2
Indenture, dated December 6, 2011, among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2011 (File No. 001-34037)),, as amended by Supplemental Indenture, dated February 29, 2012, by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 1, 2012 (File No. 001-34037)),, as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated May 7, 2012, by and among SESI, L.L.C. the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012 (File No. 001-34037)),, as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated August 29, 2014, by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto
31

and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2014 (File No. 001-34037)),, as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated August 3, 2015, by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-34037))as further amended by Supplemental Indenture dated August 17, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)),, as further amended by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)) as further supplemented by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2020 by and among SESI, L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2020 (File No. 001-34037)).

4.3

4.3
Indenture, dated August 17, 2017, among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)),), as further amended by Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2017, by and among SESI L.L.C., the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2017 (File No. 001-34037))..

74


4.4

4.4

4.5*

4.5

10.1

10.1

10.2

10.2

10.3

10.3

10.4

10.4
32

10.5^

10.5
^

10.6^

10.6
^

10.7^

10.7
^

10.8^

10.8
^

10.9^

10.9
^

10.10^

10.10
^

10.11^

10.11
^

10.12^

10.12
^

10.13^

10.13
^

10.14^

10.14
^

75



10.17^

10.17
^

10.18^

10.18
^

10.19^

10.19
^

10.20^

10.20
^

10.21^

10.21
^

10.22^

10.22
^

10.23^

10.23
^

10.24^

10.24
^

10.25^

10.25
^

10.26^

10.26
^

10.27^

10.27
^

10.28

10.28
Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 20, 2017, among SESI, L.L.C., Superior Energy Services, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the lenders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2017 (File No. 001-34037)), as amended by First Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 25, 2018, among SESI, L.L.C., Superior Energy Services, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. as administrative agent and the lenders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Superior Energy Services, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed October 23, 2018 (File No.
34

76


10.29

10.30^

10.30
^

10.31^

10.31
^

14.1

14.1

21.1*

21.1

23.1*

23.1

31.1*

31.1
31.2
31.3*

31.2*

31.4*

32.1*

Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code.

32.2*

32.1

101.INS*

32.2
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

35

101.CAL*

101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

*

Filed herein

^

104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
*Filed herewith.
Incorporated by reference into this Form
10-K/A
as indicated.
^Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.


77

36

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

Date: June 11, 2020

Date: February 28, 2020

By:

By:

/s/ David. D. Dunlap

David D. Dunlap

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title
Date

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ David D. Dunlap

President and Chief Executive Officer

February 28,

June 11, 2020

David D. Dunlap

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

February 28,

June 11, 2020

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ James W. Spexarth

Chief Accounting Officer

February 28,

June 11, 2020

James W. Spexarth

(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Terence E. Hall

Chairman of the Board

February 28,

June 11, 2020

Terence E. Hall

/s/ James M. Funk

Director

February 28,

Director
June 11, 2020

James M. Funk

/s/ Peter D. Kinnear

Director

February 28,

Director
June 11, 2020

Peter D. Kinnear

/s/ Janiece M. Longoria

Director

February 28,

Director
June 11, 2020

Janiece M. Longoria

/s/ Michael M. McShane

Director

February 28,

Director
June 11, 2020

Michael M. McShane

/s/ W. Matt Ralls

Director

February 28,

Director
June 11, 2020

W. Matt Ralls


SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands)

Balance at the

Charged to

beginning of

costs and

Balance at the

Description

the year

expenses

Deductions

end of the year

2019

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$

12,080

$

3,006

$

2,930

$

12,156

2018

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$

29,037

$

3,569

$

20,526

$

12,080

2017

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$

29,740

$

4,254

$

4,957

$

29,037

79