SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORMForm 10-K

   
(Mark One)
  
x
þ
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended April 26, 200225, 2003
ORor
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
  For the transition period from           to           .

Commission File Number 0-27130

NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.Network Appliance, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware
77-0307520
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 77-0307520
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

495 East Java Drive,

Sunnyvale, California 94089
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 822-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None
   
Title of each classEach ClassName of Exchange on which registeredWhich Registered


none
 none

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value
(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes xþ          No o

     Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes þ          No o

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant, as of May 24,October 25, 2002, was $4,564,195,010$2,322,696,600 (based on the closing price for shares of the Registrant’s common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market for the last tradingbusiness day prior to that date). Shares of common stock held by each executive officer, director, and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

     On May 24, 2002, 335,355,98923, 2003, 341,080,594 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     The information called for by Part III of this Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on August 29, 2002,September 2, 2003, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after April 26, 2002.

25, 2003.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1.Business1. Business
Item 2.Properties2. Properties
Item 3.Legal3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Submissions4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5.Market5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6.Selected6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Item 7.Management’s7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7a.Quantitative7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk
Item 8.Financial8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 9.Changes9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10.Directors10. Directors and Executive Officers of The Registrant
Item 11.Executive11. Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13.Certain13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14.Exhibits,14. Controls and Procedures
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEXCERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
EXHIBIT 10.17
EXHIBIT 21.1CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
EXHIBIT 23.1
EXHIBIT 99.1


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

All statements included or incorporated by reference in thisForward-Looking Statements:

This Annual Report on Form 10-K other than statements or characterizations of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Examples ofcontains forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning projected revenueswithin the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and profits; research and development expenses; sales and marketing expenses; general and administrative expenses; interest income and other, net; provision for income taxes; realizationSection 21E of deferred tax assets; liquidity and sufficiencythe Securities Exchange Act of existing cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments for near-term requirements; purchase commitments; and the effect of recent accounting pronouncements on our financial condition and results of operations. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us.1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements can often be identified byusually contain the words such as “anticipates,“estimate,“expects,“intend,“intends,“plan,“plans,“predict,“predicts,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,“seek,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “potential,“anticipate,“continue,“expect,” “believe,” or similar expressions and variations or negatives of these words. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. TheseAll forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, (1) our plan to continue to expand our appliance architecture in future product designs and service offerings; (2) our plan to continue to participate in developing industry standards; (3) our intent to regularly introduce new products and product enhancements and our intent to support current and new products and product enhancements; (4) our expectation that our expenditures on expanding our current product offerings and introducing new products will increase in absolute dollars; (5) the possibility that we may need to increase our materials purchases, contract manufacturing capacity and internal test and quality functions to meet anticipated demand; (6) our intention to continue to establish and maintain business relationships with technology companies; (7) our belief that our existing facilities and those currently being developed in Sunnyvale, California, will be sufficient for our needs for at least the next two years; (8) our expectation that we will continue to add sales capacity; (9) our expectation that we will increase sales and marketing expenses commensurate with future revenue growth; (10) our belief that our general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute terms in fiscal 2004; (11) our belief that our existing liquidity and capital resources are sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months; (12) our expectation that interest income will decline in fiscal 2004; (13) our estimates on excess inventory purchase commitments may change as a result of changes in demand forecasts and possible product and software defects as we transition our products; (14) recent accounting pronouncements on our financial condition and results of operations; (15) our expectation that service revenue will grow; and (16) our belief that our forward currency contracts will not subject us to undue risk; (17) our expectation that amortization expense for existing technology will be $3.0 million in fiscal 2004; (18) our expectation that deferred stock compensation amortization for fiscal 2004 and 2005 will be $1.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively; and (19) the possibility that we may be obligated for additional lease payments of approximately $4.1 million to be payable through November 2010, in the event that our vacated facilities are not subleased, are inherently uncertain as they are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions concerning future events, and they are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Therefore, our actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained herein. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include, but are not limited to: (1) the amount of orders received in future periods; (2) our ability to ship our products in a timely manner; (3) our ability to achieve anticipated pricing, cost and gross margin levels; (4) our ability to successfully introduce new products; (5) our ability to achieve and capitalize on changes in market demand; (6) acceptance of, and demand for, our products; (7) our ability to maintain our supplier and contract manufacturer relationships; (8) the ability of our competitors to introduce new products that compete successfully with our products; (9) the general economic environment and the continued growth of the storage and content delivery markets; (10) our ability to sustain and/or improve our cash and overall financial position; (11) our ability to generate future income to utilize our deferred tax assets; and (12) those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Reporthereof and are based upon the information available to us at this time. Such information is subject to change, and we will not necessarily inform you of such changes. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subjectperformance. We disclaim any obligation to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressedupdate information in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, some of which are listed under the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.statement.

1


PART I

Item 1.BusinessBusiness

Overview

     Network Appliance, Inc., is a worldwide leader in enterprise network storage and data management solutions. NetApp® network storage solutions and service offerings provide data-intensive enterprises with consolidated storage, improved data center operations, economical business continuance, and efficient remote data access across the distributed enterprise.access. Network Appliance’s success to date has been in delivering highly cost-effective network storage solutions that reduce the complexity associated with conventional storage solutions. We believe ourOur products have set the standard for simplicity and ease of operation, with what we believe to be one of the lowest total costs of ownership (TCO) and highest returns on investment (ROI) in the industry. Network ApplianceTM solutions are the data management and storage foundation for leading enterprises, government agencies, and universities worldwide.

     Network Appliance was founded in 1992 with the goal of simplifying data access by creating the world’s first network storage appliance. The first system was shipped in 1993. Today Network Appliance is a multinational corporation with over 2,2002,300 employees and an installed base of products in over 90 countries.

     Network Appliance focuses on simplifying“simplifying the complex. This philosophy drives the entire company,Company, from product design and system operation through support processes. Our drive for simplicity has deliveredThis results in significant customer advantages:advantages, including:

 • Lower total cost of ownership, in part because system administrators can more efficiently manage much greater amounts of information, and also because recovery times are significantly reduced in the event of a disaster or data corruption.
 
 • Business agility, by improving our customers’ ability to react quickly to changes via rapid deployment or reconfiguration of storage assets.

1


 • Improved information availability, because simplicity drivesdue to increased reliability.
 
 • Improved application performance, enabling customers to advance their time-to-market goals.goals and create new revenue-generating opportunities.
• Business continuance via online rapid restore and disaster recovery deployments.

Customer Base

     Our diversified customer base spans a number of large vertical markets. Our storage infrastructure is deployed in the largest enterprises within each of the vertical markets on which we have focused our efforts. Examples include:

• Energy.Customers in the energy market have traditionally deployed our products to support their exploration activities, where the simplicity of the appliance architecture and the ability to support massive amounts of data are critical. Our solutions help enable energy companies to meet their workflow optimization objectives, improve quality, reduce cycle times, and lower costs.
• Federal government.The U.S. federal government is one of the largest IT consumers in the world, and Network Appliance Federal Systems, Inc., provides solutions for many data-intensive activities, including intelligence gathering, analysis, and civilian and military operations.
• Financial services.New data-processing methodologies, shorter time frames for settlement transactions, and new demands for better knowledge management are requiring financial services firms to improve their data storage infrastructures. Network Appliance solutions for enterprise storage enable these financial institutions to effectively manage large amounts of data in a high-speed distributed infrastructure, enabling customers to leverage their existing technology investments and derive maximum value from their time-sensitive information.

2


• High technology.Global high-technology enterprises, including semiconductor, systems, and software companies, are keenly focused on reducing infrastructure cost and improving time-to-market. Network Appliance solutions enable high-technology firms to achieve these goals by reducing total cost of ownership and providing highly reliable systems and rapid access to corporate information assets.
• Internet.Internet-focused businesses place considerable and often unpredictable demands on transaction-intensive, database-driven environments such as electronic mail (e-mail), World Wide Web (WWW), and electronic commerce (e-commerce). In a marketplace where retaining customer loyalty is paramount, Internet-focused businesses must have high performance and readily available data to ensure their customers do not seek alternative providers. Scalable distributed architectures based on Network Appliance’s products improve data availability, scalability, and performance, while reducing the total cost of ownership.
• Life sciences.Pharmaceutical, bioresearch, genomic research, and care providers are focused on developing vital new drugs, improving quality of patient care, and increasing their returns on investment. Network Appliance solutions enable fast access, integration, and sharing of massive amounts of exponentially growing scientific and medical imaging data, reduced time-to-market, and improvements in operational efficiency.
• Major manufacturing.Global manufacturing companies face intense competitive pressure to develop attractive new products, improve time-to-market, and optimize profitability. Network Appliance solutions enable these companies to simplify the management overhead associated with storing and protecting large amounts of ERP, engineering, and manufacturing product data, while ensuring that information can be easily and efficiently distributed to manufacturing and distribution sites around the world.
• Telecommunications.Service providers in the telecommunications industry are faced with deregulation, globalization, increased competition, and often a substantial debt burden. As a result, they must control infrastructure costs while maintaining or improving services to existing customers and at the same time identifying and developing compelling new revenue streams in order to grow their business. Network Appliance’s products and solutions allow these providers to quickly and cost-effectively build the network storage infrastructure and content delivery networks required by the global telecommunications industry.

Customer Challenges

     Network Appliance enterprise network storage solutions directly address the major information technology challenges that enterprises face — consolidating rapidly growing quantities of storage, reducing costs associated with data center operations, ensuring business continuance, and managing data throughout the globally distributed enterprise.

 • Storage consolidation.Managing the explosive growth of data is one of the greatest challenges enterprises face today. Network Appliance gives enterprises the scalable solutions they need to consolidate storage from hundreds or thousands of servers and manage storage efficiently in a mixed server environment.
 
 • Data center operations.More than just applications and hardware, the data center is the nerve center of an organization, controlling the flow of information throughout the enterprise. Many of the costs that drive up the total cost of information technology (IT) ownership are associated with data center operations, and include tasks such as data backup and recovery, hardware and software maintenance, performance management, and resource allocation. Our simplesimplified appliance architecture automates or eliminates many of these administrative tasks, and delivers simple, centrally managed, and flexible data storage that leverages and increases the performance of existing IT infrastructure.infrastructures.
 
 • Business continuance.Many enterprises are increasingly focused on disaster preparedness and recovery and must avoid costly downtime in the event of a major disaster.disaster or localized disruption. Minutes of downtime are costly, and hours of downtime can be catastrophic. Working in tandem with

3


the existing network infrastructure (both Fibre Channel and Ethernet), our storage appliances and data management software enable customers to implement disaster recovery and data mirroring plans quickly and effectively, while minimizing incremental telecommunications and administration costs.
 
 • Distributed enterprise.As enterprises grow, it becomes increasingly difficult to provide timely information to remote locations and branch offices, jeopardizing their productivity. NetApp products accelerate information access and application performance while reducing bandwidth costs, and also reduce the cost and complexity associated with managing the data in these distributed offices. Our solutions enable enterprises to quickly replicate and relay information to and from one or many locations, fully protecting data in remote offices and locations.

A Solution-Based Approach

     To solve these customer challenges, Network Appliance offers a growing number of integrated solutions that address the specific data management hurdles faced by our enterprise customers. These turnkey solutions, which include hardware, software, service, and financing components, enable our customers to simplify their storage management, leverage their existing infrastructure, and increase their return on investment. The solutions that have received the greatest level of interest to date include:

• Storage consolidation:File sharing and messaging applications are critical to successful enterprise operations. Network Appliance offers highly available, scalable, and cost-effective storage consolidation solutions that incorporate the NetApp unified storage platform and the feature-rich functionality of data and resource management software to deliver storage with simplified backup and reduced recovery time as well as the capability to add storage without downtime. By freeing up valuable infrastructure and staff resources, Network Appliance storage consolidation solutions improve enterprise productivity, performance, and profitability.
• Data protection: The Network Appliance data protection solution simplifies the complex backup and recovery process while accelerating time-to-recovery. This is accomplished through reduced operational costs, enabling immediate access to information, and the elimination of backup windows.
• Internet access and security:The Internet access and security solution merges proxy caching and storage technologies to improve the secure access and management of information to eliminate obstacles created by geography, complexity, and resource limitations. In accomplishing this NetApp reduces costs, increases collaboration, and increases productivity.

     No matter the solution, NetApp strives to simplify whenever possible, utilizing open standards and driving industry collaboration, partnering with other industry leaders, and providing world-class global service and support.

 • Simplicity.NetApp’sThe NetApp appliance architecture allows enterprises to reduce management overhead, decrease deployment times, and eliminate downtime typically associated with general-purpose architectures. Network Appliance plans to continue to expand on the appliance architecture in future product designs and service offerings.
 
 • Open standards and industry collaboration.Network Appliance participates in and leads many industry initiatives and organizations, such as the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA), that have defined standards that are widely deployed today. Standards that Network Appliance has helped advance include the Network File System (NFS) protocol for file access in UNIX® and Linux® environments,environments; the Common Internet File System (CIFS) protocol for file access in Windows® environments,environments; the Network Data Management Protocol (NDMP) for simplifying backup of networked storage; the Internet Content Adaptation Protocol (ICAP) for content adaptation in Web environments, the Network Data Management Protocol (NDMP) for simplifying backup of networked storage, andenvironments; the Direct Access File System (DAFS) protocol for high-performance, high-throughput access to data. We plan to continue to participate in driving emerging standards, including

2


NFS version 4, 10 Gigabit Ethernet,data; and the Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) protocol for building block-based storage area networks using widely deployed Ethernet infrastructures. We plan to continue to participate in driving emerging standards, including NFS version 4 and 10 Gigabit Ethernet.

4


 • Business application integration and partnerships.Network Appliance’s goal is to deliver complete network storage solutions to customers. Our partners are vital to our success in this area, and we have strengthened oursignificant partner relationships with database and business application companies including EDS/ PLM Solutions, Dassault Catia, Documentum, EDS/PLM Solutions, several units within IBM including DB2 and Lotus, Interwoven, Landmark Graphics, Microsoft, Openwave, Oracle, Rational, SAP, SAS, Sybase, Vignette, and others. These application partnerships enhance our ability to reduce implementation time, increase application availability, and provide the highest level of solution support to customers. Technology and infrastructure solution partners enable seamless integration into customers’ existing environments, resulting in lower costs and more rapid deployment. Our infrastructure partner list includes ADIC, Atempo, Bakbone, Brocade, Cisco, Commvault, Computer Associates, Egenera, F5 Networks, Fujitsu Prime Software Technology, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM Tivoli, Ingrian Networks, KVS, Legato, QuantumyATL,McData, NuView, Precise Software Solutions, Quantum/ATL, Reliaty, RLX Technologies, Spectra Logic, StorageTek, Symantec, Syncsort, and Veritas.
 
 • Global service and support.Network Appliance’s increasing number of enterprise customers requires a global, integrated service and support model. These requirements have been met by expanding efforts in professional services and support offerings, as well as by continuing to develop strategic partnerships. Our partnerships with service providers such as Accenture, Computer Sciences Corporation, and IBM Global Services and PwC allow us to better serve customers by broadening service offerings, as well as leveraging existing service and support relationships that customers may already have in place.

Target VerticalsClasses of Data

     WeNetApp products and solutions are focusedbased on expanding our presencethe premise that not all data is created equal. Enterprise customers face a significant challenge in highly targeted vertical markets. Examples include:designing networked storage infrastructures that balance the availability requirements of their applications and associated data with the cost of the storage solution. Storing all data on an expensive, monolithic, mainframe-class array is no longer acceptable to customers who must carefully evaluate the value of their information. As a result, data is being classified by availability and performance requirements in relation to cost.

 • Energy.Business-critical data.Customers in Business-critical applications, including trading-floor applications and ERP systems, require the energy markethighest levels of availability and reliability, have traditionally deployed our products to support their exploration activities, wheremore dedicated management resources, and exhibit the simplicityleast amount of cost sensitivity. If this data is unavailable, the appliance architecturebusiness is typically not generating revenue and the ability to support massive amounts of data are critical. Our solutions help enable energy companies to meet their workflow optimization objectives, improve quality, reduce cycle times, and lower costs.may incur other financial penalties.
 
 • Federal government.Business operations data.During fiscal year 2002, we launched a new subsidiary, Network Appliance Federal Systems, Inc. The U.S. federal government This category includes data used by externally visible business operations applications, including e-mail, customer support applications, and external Web sites. If this data is one ofunavailable, it may be apparent to customers and prospects, impacting revenue and reflecting poorly on the largest IT consumers in the world,organization. As such, this data has higher reliability and Network Appliance Federal Systems, Inc., provides solutions for many data-intensive activities, including intelligence gathering, analysis,availability requirements, and civiliantypically requires more significant storage infrastructure and military operations.data management software investments.
 
 • Financial services.Business internal data.New data processing methodologies, shorter time frames for settlement transactions, and new demands for better knowledge management are requiring financial services firms to improve their data storage infrastructures. Network Appliance solutions for enterprise storage enable these financial institutions to effectively manage large amounts This class of data inis accessed by internal employees, and while the availability of the data is not important to customers outside the business, it can have a high-speed distributed infrastructure, enabling customers to leverage their existing technology investmentsbig impact on the users of the data inside the business. Examples of business internal data could include corporate intranets, HR systems, and derive maximum value from their time-sensitive information.data warehouses used for analytical purposes.
 
 • High technology.Departmental and remote office data.Global high-technology enterprises, including semiconductor, systems, Departmental and software companies, are keenly focused on reducing infrastructure costremote-office deployments also require a low-cost solution, but typically need higher levels of availability with low management overhead. Data in this class is typically not used outside the department or remote office, and improving time-to-market. Network Appliance solutions enable high-technology firmsif the data becomes unavailable, the impact to achieve these goals by reducing total cost of ownership and providing highly reliable and rapid access to corporate information assets.the overall business is minimal.
 
 • Internet.Reference data.Internet-focused businesses place considerable Types of reference data include e-mail archives; bank, brokerage, and often unpredictable demands on transaction-intensive, database-driven environments such as electronic mail (e-mail), World Wide Web (WWW),billing statements; medical images and electronic commerce (e-commerce). In a marketplace where retaining customer loyalty is paramount, Internet-focused businesses cannot experience poor performancerecords; MCAD drawings; integrated chip designs; and seismic and satellite data. Customers require fast data access at costs comparable to much slower high-end tape or poor data availability, which can cause their customers to seek alternative providers. Scalable distributed architectures based on NetApp appliances improve data availability, scalability, and performance, while reducing the total cost of ownership.optical libraries, with minimal ongoing management cost.

35


 • Life sciences.Archive data.Pharmaceutical, bioresearch, genomic research,Enterprises require a very low-cost storage solution for archive data and care providersbackups, which have historically been stored on magnetic tape. Many customers are focusednow storing archive data on developing vital new drugs, improving quality of patient care,more flexible disk-based systems, such as the NetApp NearStoreTM, which reduces backup windows and increasing their returns on investment. Network Appliance solutions enable fast access, integration and sharing of massive amounts of exponentially growing scientific and medical imaging data, reducing time-to-market, and improving operational efficiency.
• Major manufacturing.Global manufacturing companies face intense competitive pressure to develop attractive new products, improve time-to-market, and optimize profitability. Network Appliance solutions enable these companies to simplify the management overhead associated with storing and protecting huge amounts of ERP, engineering, and manufacturing product data, while ensuring that information can be easily and efficiently distributed to manufacturing and distribution sites around the world.
• Telecommunications.Service providersenables rapid recovery in the telecommunications industry are faced with deregulation, globalization, increased competition, and oftenevent of a substantial debt burden. As a result, they must control infrastructure costs to serve existing customers and grow by identifying and developing compelling new revenue streams. NetApp products and solutions allow them to quickly and cost-effectively build the network storage infrastructure and content delivery networks required by the global telecommunications industry.disaster.

     Network Appliance solutions meet the needs of archive, reference, departmental/remote office, business internal, business operations, and business critical data with a common product architecture and data management methodology, enabling customers to easily deploy and manage all their networked storage infrastructure in the same way.

System Products

     NetApp products consist of filerfabric-attached storage (FAS) appliances, also known as filers, NearStoreTM appliances, systems, NetCache® content delivery appliances, data management and content delivery software, and professional and support services. Our configured appliances range in price from $4,000 to more than $1,000,000.

     All NetApp systems come packaged in rack-mountable enclosures that can be installed in a customer’s existing server racks or factory-installed and configured in cabinets. Our appliances are based primarily on commodity hardware, including Intel® Pentium® processors, an advanced implementation of the industry-standard PCI bus architecture, standard Ethernet adapters, and either Fibre Channel-Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL), Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA), or Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) disk interconnects.

Filers

     NetApp filers are a scalable, suite of highly available, field-proven, unified networked storage systems for consolidating data storage and simplifying data management. The filer appliances are easy to install, configure, and manage. They are specifically designed for highly scalable, network-centric IT system architectures.architectures, and support both network-attached storage (“NAS”) and storage-attached networks (“SAN”) on a single, unified platform. Our filers are designed for and deliver lower total cost of ownership than alternative competitive systems. Heterogeneous data sharing providesallows our systems to deliver simultaneous file systemdata access to Linux, UNIX, Linux, Windows, and Web-based servers and clients.clients, dramatically lowering the total cost of ownership and management complexity versus homogeneous storage systems. Filers are available in either single-node configurations or fully redundant, active/active cluster configurations that provide high data availability for business-critical environments.

     Current filer products include:

 • NetApp F880 filer.FAS 960c/FAS960 enterprise servers.Introduced during fiscal year 20022003 and built for the most demanding customers, the F880FAS960c is our highest-performance filer. The superior throughputFAS960c continues NetApp’s tradition of providing industry-leading performance in a simple, reliable, flexible, and response times allow NetApp F880 filersmanageable system. The FAS960c is designed to supportaccommodate thousands of independent users withand large, high-bandwidth applications. With the capability of managing up to 9 terabytes (TB)48TB of raw data. The increased processing power ofdata in one system and 8TB in one file system, the NetApp F880 provides maximized scalability and performance for high-end enterprise applications. An integrated CompactFlashTM boot device simplifies management in remote or multifiler environments.
• NetApp F840 filer.The balance of capacity and performance with flexible I/ O configuration enables the NetApp F840 to power a broad range of large-scale applications. The F840 is currently deployed in large service provider networks and data-intensive enterprise environments including database, ERP, and design applications.

4


• NetApp F810 and F820 filers.Introduced during fiscal year 2002, these are entry-level, enterprise-class performance filers. NetApp F810 and F820 filers suit small- to medium-sized enterprise applications. These products enable the consolidation of heterogeneous data for enterprises and service providers.
• NetApp F880c, F840c, F820c, and F810c filers.For maximized data availability in mission-critical environments, NetApp F880c, F840c, F820c, and F810c clustered filersFAS960c can meet the networked storage challenges for large enterprises and applications that require high availability. NetAppdemands of virtually any enterprise. NetApp’s clustered filers scale to support up to 18TB of raw data. Thefiler architecture integrates multiple processors in an active/active Clustered Failoverclustered failover configuration to provide high availability and scalable performance to multiple networks.
 
 • NetApp FAS940c/FAS940 enterprise server.The FAS940c can be deployed on demand in any enterprise. The flexibility and performance capabilities of the FAS940c bring FAS900 series features to a broad range of enterprise applications, including Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”), Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”), Decision Support Solutions (“DSS”), massive home directory consolidation, and Web serving.
• NetApp F880c/F880 and F825c/F825 enterprise servers.The balance of capacity and performance with flexible I/O configuration enables the NetApp F880c and F825c to power a broad range of large-scale applications. Currently deployed in the largest service provider networks and data-intensive

6


environments, including those running database/ERP and other enterprise-level applications, the F880 and F825 are proven high-performance workhorses.
• NetApp F810c/F810.The NetApp F810c server is designed for small to medium-size enterprise applications. By using the same Data ONTAPTM operating system as higher-capacity, higher-performance servers, the F810c is fully compatible with them and serves as a cost-efficient starting point in building a network infrastructure on NetApp systems.
• NetApp FAS250 filer.The NetApp FAS250 is an entry-level enterprise filer supporting capacities up to 1TB in a compact form factor. The FAS250 is completely software compatible with all other NetApp products and uses the same storage shelves and Fibre Channel disks currently available for the F800 and FAS900 series filers. The FAS250 provides customers with an attractive entry-level price and a simple upgrade path to higher-capacity, higher-performance filers.
• NetApp F87 filer.Introduced during fiscal year 2002, theThe NetApp F87 filer is targeted at workgroup and remote branch office environments. The F87 filers leverage high-volume components to bring industry-leading NetApp features and functionality to entry-level applications, supporting access for up to 576 gigabytes (GB) of raw storage for user and application data. We have announced End Of Availability (EOA) of the F87 filer. During fiscal 2003 we continued to ship the F87 filer, but expect that this product will be phased out as new products are introduced in fiscal year 2004.

Gateway Filers

The Network Appliance gFilerTM gateway is an innovative storage consolidation solution that provides file-level access to data stored in Fibre Channel storage arrays. The file data is accessed via client systems and application servers on an IP network. The NetApp gFiler uses the Data ONTAP microkernel, and functions as a NAS file server when connected to a Fibre Channel SAN from other enterprise storage vendors. Proven multiprotocol file services and advanced NetApp data management capabilities are available for consolidating, protecting, and recovering mission-critical data for applications and users.

     Current gateway filer products include:

• NetApp GF960/c gateway.Provides industry-leading performance to thousands of independent users and high-bandwidth applications. Scales to 48TB of managed capacity when configured for simultaneous active/active file access with secure failover across two independent systems.
• NetApp GF940/c gateway.Provides flexibility and industry-leading performance across a broad range of enterprise applications. Scales to 18TB of managed capacity when configured for simultaneous active/active file access with secure failover across two independent systems.
• NetApp GF825/c gateway. Provides flexibility and industry-leading price/performance across a broad range of enterprise applications. Scales to 6TB of managed capacity when configured for simultaneous active/active file access with secure failover across two independent systems.

The gFiler gateway series for Hitachi Freedom Storage is available exclusively through Hitachi Data Systems.

NearStore Systems

     NetApp NearStore products introduced during fiscal year 2002, are designed for improving data backup and recovery architectures, storing reference and regulated data, and archiving infrequently accessed files. NearStore appliancessystems back up and restore data with speed, consistency, and scalability unmatched in tape-based backup/restore solutions. The product complements and significantly improves existing tape backup processes by inserting economical and simple-to-use disk-based storage between application storage and tape libraries, resulting in a highly efficient two-stage backup configuration. Unlike alternative technologies, recovery time is measured in seconds and minutes, not hours and days. Almost any type of primary storage can be backed up to NearStore appliances,systems, including UNIX, Linux, or Windows servers with direct-attached or SAN-attached storage from all other storage vendors, desktop and notebook computers, and NetApp filers. NearStore can also be used as a mirror

7


target within a data center, or for mirroring data from distributed offices or branches to a central location.location in a fully heterogeneous, platform-independent architecture.

     NearStore appliancessystems are also ideal for consolidating nearline data resources, including reference and archive data into a single storage platform. This platform can be located and managed centrally, reducing costs associated with data center operations.

     Existing applications,With the advent of SEC regulation 17a-4 and HIPAA as well as several governmental defense requirements, NearStore, in conjunction with NetApp SnapLockTM software, is part of an open access data-retention solution targeted at regulated data industries, such as document management, have traditionally relied on Hierarchical Storage Management (HSM) solutions for infrequently accessed data. Providers of these applications are now integrating nearline storage into their blueprint solution portfolio to enable faster access to datafinancial services, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and lower their operational costs to customers. Emerging changes in traditional applications, such as data warehousing, are now occurring for the purpose of separating active and inactive database data between primary and secondary storage. The ability for an organization to have an identical management framework for both their primary and secondary storage is a unique NetApp advantage.government.

     TheCurrent NearStore R100 is available in configurations ranging from capacities of 12TB to 96TB, and can be configured and managed to create virtually unlimited capacity.products include:

• The NearStore R150 is available in system modules of 12TB and 24TB. Multiple modules are easily configured and managed to provide hundreds of terabytes of storage with DataFabricTM Manager and Virtual File ManagerTM software.
• The NearStore R100 was the first family of NearStore products and was introduced in fiscal year 2002. The NearStore R100 is available in system modules of 7TB and 12TB.

NetCache Appliances

     The NetCache product line is a scalable suite of appliances, designed to solve complex Web content delivery problems faced by enterprises and service providers. NetCache appliances currently power some of the world’s largest enterprises and telecommunications networks. These appliances are deployed across the entire network, from the primary data center to remote points of presence (POPs) and local offices worldwide. They reduce network latency to enhance the overall Web experience for intranet users, e-commerce customers, and external suppliers and partners. NetCache appliances reliably deliver high-quality audio and video streams, enabling a host of next-generation network services and applications such as online training, executive broadcasts, and large-scale corporate and consumer video-on-demand services. NetCache appli-

5


ancesappliances also enable the delivery of value-added services such as load balancing and virus scanning at the edge of the network.

     Current NetCache products include:

 • NetCache C6100.The high-end NetCache C6100 delivers high levels of performance and reliability for the data center and other high-bandwidth locations. Large content libraries — up to 2TB of storage — can be reliably stored and optimally accessed. Enterprises and service providers use the NetCache C6100 to improve end-user response times, manage quality of service, reduce bandwidth costs, and provide security and content filteringcontent-filtering controls.
 
 • NetCache C3100.C2100.The midrange NetCache C3100C2100 optimizes price/performance by supporting a wide range of capacity and reliability features. Reliability and availability of mission-critical data are ensured with features such as RAID data protection, redundant hardware, and hot-swap drives. These capabilities make the NetCache C3100C2100 an attractive solution for environments experiencing rapid growth.
 
 • NetCache C1100.C1200.Globally distributed enterprises, small/medium-sized businesses, and service provider remote points of presence select the entry-level NetCache C1100C1200 for its attractive price point and space-sensitive design. The affordable, fast access to data and content filteringcontent-filtering capabilities increase productivity and improve overall user satisfaction. The appliance architecture is especially attractive in these environments where there is often limited local technical expertise.

Software Products

     Network Appliance sells filer-based software as well as server-based software that simplifies storage administration as well as increases data availability. All NetApp appliances are configured with the Data

8


ONTAPTM microkernel as part of the base system, which includes the patented Write Anywhere File Layout (WAFL®) file system. We introduced Data ONTAP 6.26.3 and 6.4 during fiscal 20022003, and included support for the new Direct Access File System (DAFS)Fibre Channel SAN protocol and the Ethernet-based iSCSI protocol, as well as several new data management, data replication, and data protection software products, and improvements to every major feature.products. Data ONTAP software offers a unique set of features to ensure mission-critical availability levels, while lowering the total cost of ownership and the complexity typically associated with enterprise storage management. Software featuresSnapshotTM technology, included as part of the base system, enables online backups and productsprovides rapid access to previous versions of data without requiring complete separate copies. Snapshot copies also eliminate the need to recover data from a tape archive in the event of a disaster or user error.

     Network Appliance develops software support for a number of industry-standard protocols. The base filer and NearStore systems include one protocol, and additional protocols may be added at any time for an additional license fee. Protocols available on filer and NearStore systems include:

 • SnapshotCommon Internet File System (CIFS).TM. Snapshots enable online backups, providing rapid access to previous versions of data without requiring complete separate copies. Snapshots eliminate the need to recover data from a tape archive CIFS is an industry-standard network file-sharing protocol used in the event of a disaster or user error.Microsoft® Windows environments.
 
 • SnapRestore® software.Direct Access File System (DAFS).SnapRestore allows rapid restoration of a file system to an earlier point in time, typically in only a few seconds. SnapRestore is based on the Data ONTAP Snapshot technology and enables customers to greatly minimize recovery time in the event of data corruption or loss.
• SnapVaultTM software.SnapVault provides extended and centralized disk-based backup for filers by periodically backing up a Snapshot to another filer or NearStore appliance on the network. Storing multiple Snapshots on the SnapVault server enables enterprises to keep weeks, months, or years of backups online, improving recovery times in the event of a disaster or data corruption. SnapVault was introduced during fiscal year 2002.
• SnapMirror® software.SnapMirror remote mirroring software enables automated file system replication between sites. SnapMirror leverages the Data ONTAP Snapshot technology and enables customers to quickly recover from site disasters, easily replicate critical data, and cost-effectively deploy centralized backup architectures.
• SnapManager®software.SnapManager software for Microsoft® Exchange 5.5 and Microsoft Exchange 2000 allows customers to perform online backup and rapid recovery of Microsoft Exchange data. SnapManager for Microsoft Exchange 2000, introduced during fiscal year 2002, is the first block-services storage product shipped by Network Appliance.
• SnapDriveTMsoftware.SnapDrive, introduced during fiscal year 2002, enables a block-based storage connection for Microsoft® SQL Server and Oracle® database software on Windows 2000 platforms.

6


Customers take full advantage of the simple data management capabilities of the filer appliance in block-based storage environments.
• Clustered Failover software.Clustered Failover software for filers ensures high data availability for business-critical environments by eliminating any single point of failure through a fully redundant, active/ active network storage cluster configuration.
• MultiStoreTM software.Many enterprises have thousands of Windows and UNIX file servers distributed throughout their networks. These servers not only represent an enormous hardware investment, they also create huge, ongoing administration costs. NetApp MultiStore reduces this major expense and complexity by enabling a single physical filer to appear as multiple virtual filers. Introduced during fiscal year 2002, NetApp MultiStore software enables customers to quickly and seamlessly consolidate a large number of servers onto a single filer.
• FilerView®software.FilerView, a Web-based administration tool, allows IT administrators to fully manage filers from remote locations on the network using a Web browser.
• DataFabricTMManager software.DataFabric Manager offers the ability to manage multiple NetApp filer appliances, NearStore appliances, and NetCache appliances from a single administrative console, reducing administrative complexity and total cost of ownership. DataFabric Manager 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 were introduced during fiscal year 2002.
• ApplianceWatchTM software.ApplianceWatch software allows IT professionals to centrally manage and administer NetApp appliances using standard management frameworks, including products from HP OpenView and Tivoli.
• ContentDirectorTMsoftware.ContentDirector software provides secure distribution of Web content from centrally deployed storage appliances across global networks to multiple remotely deployed storage appliances. In addition, it fully automates distribution and synchronization of Internet content, including streaming media, applications, and graphics. ContentDirector 2.0 was introduced during fiscal year 2002.
• NDMP software.Support for the industry-standard Network Data Management Protocol (NDMP) enables customers to maximize their infrastructure investments and reduce the time required to do tape backups. Data ONTAP provides support for Fibre Channel, Ethernet, and SCSI-attached tape libraries, with support for industry-standard networking and backup software and hardware from leading vendors including ADIC, Brocade, BakBone Software, Cisco, CommVault Systems, Computer Associates, Legato, Quadratec, Quantum/ATL, SpectraLogic, StorageTek, Syncsort, and Veritas. These solutions allow customers to easily share tape libraries among multiple filers in a large enterprise deployment.
• DAFS protocol.The Direct Access File System (DAFS) protocol was defined by an industry group of more than 85 companies to solvesolves the I/O and data-sharing problems that exist in high-performance data center applications, including collaborative environments and databases. DAFS takes advantage of standard memory-to-memory interconnects, including virtual interface (VI) and InfiniBand, to dramatically improve the performance, reliability, and scalability of these applications. We believeThe DAFS protocol is an important foundation technology that will enable a new generation of high-performance, highly scalable data center applications. Support for DAFS was shipped during fiscal year 2002.not available on NearStore systems.
 
  Fibre Channel Protocol (FCP). FCP is the standard serial SCSI command protocol used in Fibre Channel SAN networks. FCP is a heterogeneous protocol supported by all standard Linux, UNIX, and Windows operating systems.
• iSCSI protocol. iSCSI, a new protocol defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force, offers the consolidation, scalability, and management advantages of a storage area network (SAN) without the unfamiliarity, complexity, and expense of Fibre Channel. iSCSI is an Ethernet-based protocol.
• Network File System (NFS). NFS is an industry-standard client/server protocol for sharing files and directories over a network in Linux and UNIX environments.

The base NetCache system includes support for caching standard Web protocols, as well as support for proxy caching. NetCache protocols available for an additional license fee include:

• Distributed Network File Services (DNFS).Provides rapid access to shared UNIX files for enhanced collaboration in distributed environments. DNFS appliances deployed in remote offices automatically replicate, store, and serve the files or file portions that are requested by remote users without the need for any replication software or scripts.
• Microsoft Windows MediaTM streaming.Fully supports Windows Media features such as live stream splitting, delivery of video-on-demand, and support for digital rights management, authentication, authorization, and logging.
• QuickTimeTM streaming.Supports Apple® QuickTime streaming servers and the Apple QuickTime player to optimize the delivery of QuickTime content.
• RealNetworks® streaming.Supports RealAudioTM, RealVideoTM, and replicates SureStream functionality between RealSystemTM servers and RealPlayer®.

     Network Appliance also offers a comprehensive set of software products that provide specialized functionality to solve a variety of business problems. These add-on software features and products include:

• ApplianceWatchTM. ApplianceWatch software allows IT professionals to centrally manage and administer NetApp appliances using standard management frameworks, including products from HP OpenView and Tivoli.

9


• Clustered Failover software.Clustered Failover software for filers ensures high data availability for business-critical environments by eliminating any single point of failure through a fully redundant, active/active network storage cluster configuration.
• ContentDirectorTM. ContentDirector software provides secure distribution of Web content from centrally deployed storage appliances across global networks to multiple remotely deployed storage appliances. In addition, it fully automates distribution and synchronization of Internet content, including streaming media, applications, and graphics.
• DAFS Database Accelerator (DDA), also introduced during fiscal year 2002,.The DDA is a high-performance storage solution for Sun®SunTM SolarisTM-based- based servers running Oracle8iTM and Oracle9iTM, IBM DB2, and Sybase® database software. It is the industry’s first DAFS implementation and is an efficient, transparent storage solution for database management systems, delivering the performance of direct-attached disks with the ease of management of filer-based storage.
• DataFabricTMManager software.DataFabric Manager offers the ability to manage multiple NetApp filer appliances, NearStore systems, and NetCache appliances from a single administrative console, reducing administrative complexity and total cost of ownership. DataFabric Manager 2.1 and 2.2 were introduced during fiscal year 2003.
• FilerView®.FilerView a Web-based administration tool, allows IT administrators to fully manage filers from remote locations on the network using a Web browser.
• MetroCluster.MetroCluster, introduced during fiscal 2003, is a highly available business continuance solution ideal for campus and metropolitan area networks. MetroCluster enables customers to quickly and easily resume mission-critical operation at a remote site with no data loss and minimal downtime.
• MultiStoreTM. Many enterprises have thousands of Windows and UNIX file servers distributed throughout their networks. These servers not only represent an enormous hardware investment, they also create huge, ongoing administration costs. NetApp MultiStore reduces this major expense and complexity by enabling a single physical filer to appear as multiple virtual filers. NetApp MultiStore software enables customers to quickly and seamlessly consolidate a large number of servers onto a single filer.
• SnapDriveTM.SnapDrive is a management software package that enables customers to take full advantage of the simple data management capabilities of the filer appliance in block-based storage environments. SnapDrive 2.0 was introduced during fiscal year 2003.
• SnapLockTM.SnapLock, introduced during fiscal year 2003, is designed to meet the requirements of “data permanence” required by various government regulations — most notably SEC Reg 17a-4 for financial services broker-dealers. SnapLock provides WORM (write once, read many) attributes such as nonerasability and nonrewritability that prevent data, once it is stored on NearStore, from ever being altered or deleted.
• SnapManager®.SnapManager software for Microsoft Exchange 5.5 and Microsoft Exchange 2000 allows customers to perform online backup and rapid recovery of Microsoft Exchange data. SnapManager software has been enhanced in fiscal year 2003 to also provide the same benefits of online backup and rapid recovery to SQL Server and Lotus Domino environments as well.
• SnapMirror®.SnapMirror remote mirroring software enables automated asynchronous file system replication between sites. SnapMirror leverages the Data ONTAP Snapshot technology and enables customers to quickly recover from site disasters, easily replicate critical data, and cost-effectively deploy centralized backup architectures.
• SnapRestore®.SnapRestore allows rapid restoration of a file system to an earlier point in time, typically in only a few seconds. SnapRestore is based on the Data ONTAP Snapshot technology and enables customers to greatly minimize recovery time in the event of data corruption or loss.

10


• SnapVaultTM. SnapVault provides extended and centralized disk-based backup for filers, and for heterogeneous servers with their associated storage, by periodically backing up data to, and maintaining snapshots on, another filer or NearStore system on the network. Storing multiple Snapshot copies on the SnapVault server enables enterprises to keep weeks, months, or years of backups online, improving recovery times in the event of a disaster or data corruption.
• SyncMirrorTM.SyncMirror, introduced during fiscal 2003, is a synchronous data replication tool for mission- critical applications in a local data center environment. The replicated data is completely up-to-date and provides a higher level of data availability by protecting data against various physical storage component failures.
• Virtual File ManagerTM (VFM). VFMTM, introduced during fiscal year 2003, is a file virtualization solution for managing distributed storage in Windows and multiprotocol environments. VFM provides a global namespace that dramatically simplifies the administration of large file server environments.

     Customers may purchase an annual software subscription upgrade that provides online access to all software and firmware upgrades and updates.

7


Customer Service and Support

     The Network Appliance customeroffers comprehensive, global, enterprise-wide support solutions. Some enterprise customers require a comprehensive, enterprise-wide support solution, while others operate with complete self-sufficiency. Our flexible service programs help our customers maximize data availability and support organization providesmaintain a rangelow total cost of technical support services, professional consulting services, and training. We believe that providing high levels of customer service and technical support are critical to customer satisfaction and to our success.ownership.

     Network Appliance’s commitment to customer service and satisfaction is reflected in our Global Support Center (GSC) operations available from four locations: Sunnyvale, California; Raleigh, North Carolina; Hoofddorp, Netherlands; and Singapore. Our “follow the sun” strategy provides around-the-clock support regardless of where theour customer is located. All four Global Support Centers have received the Support Center Practices (SCP) certification, which is an internationally recognized standard created by the Service & Support Professionals Association (SSPA) and a consortium of IT companies to create a recognized quality certification for support centers.

     Our proactive service options provide comprehensive enterprise-wide support and ensure optimal system configuration and performance:

• Global Advisor and Global Advisor Plus.Network Appliance will review GSC cases and remotely monitor systems for trends or issues beyond the base AutoSupport level. With Global Advisor Plus, we provide customers with direct access to back-line engineers.
• System Availability Management (SAM) and System Availability Management Plus (SAM+).Network Appliance performs regular site inspections and system availability reviews. With System Availability Management Plus, customers also receive on-site, 7x24 emergency response from our Professional Services engineers.

     Network Appliance Professional Services solutions offer proactive protection. From regularly scheduled audits to performance optimization and technology refresh recommendations, we work to ensure that customers maximize information availability and minimize downtime. Our Professional Services products include services that address:

• Assessment of existing resources, practices, and performance;
• Storage solution design;
• Network architecture evaluation and recommendations;
• Data migration;
• Database consulting;

11


• System moves;
• Installation and configuration;
• System availability management audits;
• Disaster recovery assessment, solution design, and deployment; and
• Data protection solutions.

     Warranty coverage for hardware is product-specific, for a term of either one year or three years, depending upon the product. Software warranty is for 90 days. The 90-day period warrants that media will be free of defects and will perform substantially as described in the end-user documentation. Warranty coverage includesincludes: access to the NetAppNOWTM (NetApp on the Web (NOW)TMWeb) Web site and knowledge system, AutoSupport,AutoSupport; next-business-day exchange of system components,components; 7x24 emergency phone support,support; and 7x24 Web case support for nonemergency situations.

     A customer can also purchase an extended warranty after the initial warranty coverage expires. Purchasing the extended warranty entitles the customer to access the services included in the base warranty for an additional period of time, and is typically renewed on an annual basis.

     Customers can also select from a comprehensive menu of service options to design a service program that complements their existing in-house capabilities. Customers can supplement their warranty or extended warranty packages by choosing from service options including the following service options:following:

 • Two- or four-hour hardware delivery.Software Subscription and Support (SSP). For customers who do not purchase spares kits or cannot wait untilProvides 24x7 software phone support and entitles the next day for a replacement part,customer to all major and minor releases of Network Appliance offers two-hour or four-hour hardware delivery.software and firmware upgrades. Customers who have a current software subscription are able to download new software releases from the NOW Web site.
 
 • Two-On-site service.Network Appliance provides next-business-day, 2-, or four-hour hardware replacement. For4-hour on-site service for select configurations of NetApp equipment. Provides 24x7 phone support and next-business-day, 2-hour, or 4-hour response time to system problems. After case diagnosis, a Network Appliance qualified technician will be dispatched to the customer that has a mission-critical environment or has minimalfacility to perform on-site IT capabilities, system components can be replaced within a two- or four-hour time frame. This is a 7x24 replacement service, which includes deliverydiagnostics and troubleshooting of spare system components and a trained technical service specialist on-site within two or four hours of being dispatched.

     Some enterprise customers prefer greater levels of engagement. Proactive service options provide a closer level of engagement and ensure optimal system configuration and performance.

• Global Advisor and Global Advisor Plus.the Network Appliance will review GSC casesequipment and remotely monitor systems for trends or issues beyondperform the base AutoSupport level. With Global Advisor Plus, we provide customers with direct access to back-line engineers.necessary hardware/software changes.
 
 • System Availability ManagementHardware delivery and System Availability Management Plus.replacement.Provides 24x7 phone support and 2- or 4-hour delivery of parts after a case has been submitted to Network Appliance performs regular site inspections and system availability reviews. With System Availability Management Plus, customersdiagnosed. A customer support representative or automated AutoSupport process will dispatch the parts delivery once the case has been diagnosed as hardware replacement. Customers may also receive on-site, 7x24 emergencypurchase packages that include a response from our Professional Services engineers.
• NetApp Availability AssuranceTM. This service provides customers withby a service agreement for a guaranteed data availability level. The Availability Assurance solution establishes a combination of products and services to help customers accomplish their specific business goals and objectives.Network Appliance qualified technician.

     Education: Network Appliance Professional Services solutions offer proactive protection. From regularly scheduled audits to performance optimization and technology refresh recommendations, we work to ensure that

8


customers minimize downtime and maximize information availability. Our Professional Services products include services that address:

• Assessment of existing resources, practices, and performance
• Storage solution design
• Network architecture evaluation and recommendations
• Data migration
• Database consulting
• System moves
• Installation and configuration
• System availability management audits
• Disaster recovery assessment, solution design, and deployment
• Data protection solutions

     Network Appliance also offers instructor-led, Web-based, computer-based, self-paced, or Web-based technical training,distance-learning classes, as well as custom on-site education programs and technical certification programs. Certified, experienced Network Appliance trainers teach the instructor-led programs around the world. All courses include practical lessons and feature extensive hands-on experience in installing, configuring, and troubleshooting NetApp systems.

Segment and Geographic Information

     See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financials Statements accompanying this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Seasonality

     Although operating results have not been materially and adversely affected by seasonality in the past, because of the significant seasonal effects experienced within the industry, particularly in Europe, our future operating results could be materially adversely affected by seasonality. See “Risk Factors — Factors beyond our control could cause our quarterly results to fluctuate” and “Risks inherent in our international operations

12


could have a material adverse effect on our operating results” accompanying this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Sales and Marketing

     Network Appliance markets and distributes products globally in over 90 countries. In North America, we employcountries employing a multichannel distribution strategy, which focuses on product sales to end users through a direct sales force, as well as selected value-added resellers.resellers, system integrators, and original equipment manufacturers (OEM). In North America, we employ all forms of distribution previously mentioned, with a focus on direct sales to our strategic and named accounts. In Europe, we employ a mix of resellers and direct sales channels to sell to end users. In Asia, our products are primarily sold through resellers, which are supported by channel sales representatives and technical support personnel. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of net sales in fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001, or 2000.

     During fiscal year 2002, we launched Network Appliance Canada Ltd., and Network Appliance Federal Systems, Inc., to increase our sales presence.2001.

Backlog

     Network Appliance manufactures products based on a combination of specific order requirements and forecasts of our customer demands.customers’ demand. Orders are generally placed by customers on an as-needed basis. Products are typically shipped within one to four weeks following receipt of an order. In certain circumstances, customers may cancel or reschedule orders without penalty. For these reasons, “orders” may not constitute a firm backlog and may not be a meaningful indicator of revenues.

Manufacturing

     Manufacturing operations, primarily locatedwith insourced and outsourced locations in Sunnyvale, California, and Glasgow, Scotland, include materials procurement, commodity management, component engineering, test engineering, manufacturing engineering, product assembly, product assurance, quality control, and final test. We rely on many suppliers for materials, as well as several key subcontractors for the production of certain subassemblies and finished systems. Our strategy has been to develop close relationships with our suppliers, exchanging critical information and implementing joint quality-training programs. During fiscal year 2002, we expanded theWe also use of subcontractorscontract manufacturers for the production of major subassemblies primarily to reduce our lead times for shipments to Europe and to improve our manufacturing redundancy. See “Risk Factors — We rely on a limited number of suppliers” and “Risk Factors — The loss of our sole contract manufacturer.manufacturers.” This manufacturing strategy minimizes capital

9


investment and overhead expenditures and creates flexibility for rapid expansion. We were awarded the ISO 9001 certification on May 29, 1997, and continue to be ISO-certified.

Research and Development

     During fiscal year 2002,2003, Network Appliance launched more products than in any other year in the history of the company.unified storage platforms designed to support both SAN and NAS simultaneously. We introduced a number of new systems, including the F87F825 midrange filer, the FAS940 and F810 low-end systems,FAS960 high-end filers, the F880NetCache C1200 and F880c high-end systems,C2100, and the NearStore R100,R150, which definedcontinues to define a new category of storage solution. We enhanced almost every software productcompleted the development of the new FAS250 entry-level enterprise filer, and began delivery to customers in our portfolio andthe first quarter of fiscal year 2004. We also launched new software products that significantly improve data management capabilities, provide new solutions in the areas of data protection and backup and recovery, and enable new business continuance functionality. We introduced new products to better integrate our filers into Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SQL Server, and Oracle database environments.

     See “Risk Factors — If we are unable to develop and introduce new products and respond to technological change, or if our new products do not achieve market acceptance, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.”

Competition

     The storage and content delivery markets are intensely competitive and are characterized by rapidly changing technology.

13


     In the storage market, our filerFAS appliances and data management software compete primarily against storage products and data management software from EMC Corporation, Hitachi Data Systems, Hewlett-Packard Company (including the integrated Compaq Computer Corporation), IBM Corporation, and Sun Microsystems, Inc. We have also historically encountered less-frequent competition from companies including Auspex Systems, Inc., Dell, LSI Logic Corp., MTI Corp., Procom Technology, and Procom Technology.Silicon Graphics, Inc.

     In the content delivery market, our NetCache appliances and content delivery software compete against caching appliance and content delivery software vendors including Akamai Technologies, Inc., BlueCoat Systems (formerly CacheFlow, Inc.), and Cisco Systems, Inc., and Inktomi Corp.

     Additionally a number of new, privately held companies are currently attempting to enter the storage and content delivery markets, some of which may become significant competitors in the future.

     We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the storage and content delivery markets include product benefits such as response time, reliability, data availability, scalability, ease of use, price, multiprotocol capabilities, and customer service and support.

     See “Risk Factors — An increase in competition could materially adversely affect our operating results” and “If we are unable to develop and introduce new products and respond to technological change, or if our new products do not achieve market acceptance.”

Proprietary Rights

     We currently rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions, and patents to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our software, documentation, and other written materials under trade secret, copyright, and patent laws, which afford only limited protection. We have registered our Network Appliance name and logo, FAServer®, FilerView, NetApp, NetCache, SecureShare® SnapManager, SnapMirror, SnapRestore, and WAFL®WAFL as trademarks in the United States.States (“U.S.”). Other United StatesU.S. trademarks and some of the other United StatesU.S. registered trademarks are registered internationally as well. We will continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as appropriate. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, resellers, and customers. We currently have multiple United StatesU.S. and international patent applications pending and multiple United StatesU.S. patents issued. See “Risk Factors — If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may be subject to increased competition that could materially adversely affect our operating results.”

Employees

     As of April 26, 2002,25, 2003, we had 2,2802,345 employees. Of the total, 1,2241,199 were in sales and marketing, 514526 in research and development, 246283 in finance and administration, and 296337 in manufacturing and customer service

10


operations. Our future performance depends in significant part on our key technical and senior management personnel, none of whom is bound by an employment agreement. We have never had a work stoppage and consider relations with our employees to be good.

Additional Information

Our Internet address ishttp://www.netapp.com/. We make available through our Internet Web site our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The public also may read and copy these filings at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20549. Information about this Public Reference Room is available by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

14


Executive Officers

     Our executive officers and their ages as of May 25, 2002,23, 2003, are as follows:

       
NameAgePosition



Daniel J. Warmenhoven  5152  Chief Executive Officer and Director
Thomas F. Mendoza  52President
Steven J. Gomo51  Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Jeffry R. Allen  5051  Executive Vice President, Finance andBusiness Operations Chief Financial Officer
David Hitz  3940  Executive Vice President, Engineering
James K. Lau  4344  Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer

     Daniel J. Warmenhovenjoined the Company in October 1994 as President and Chief Executive Officer, and has been a member of the Board of Directors since October 1994. In May 2000, he resigned the role of President, and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and is a Director of Network Appliance, Inc. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Warmenhoven served in various capacities, including President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc., a telecommunications company, from November 1989 to January 1994. He presently serves on the Board of Directors of Redback Networks, Inc., a communications products company. Mr. Warmenhoven holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Princeton University.

     Thomas F. Mendozawas appointed President in May 2000. Previously he served as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing, from February 1999 and Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales from 1998. Prior to that he served as Vice President, North American Sales. Prior to April 1994, Mr. Mendoza served in various capacities including Vice President, Sales, at Work Group Technology,Technology; Vice President of North American Sales at Auspex Systems, Inc.,; and Vice President of Western Operations at Stratus Computer Corp. Mr. Mendoza holds a B.A. degree from the University of Notre Dame.

     Steven J. Gomojoined Network Appliance as Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer in August 2002. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Graphics, Inc., from February 1998 to August 2000, and most recently, Chief Financial Officer for Gemplus International S.A., headquartered in Luxembourg from November 2000 to April 2002. Prior to February 1998, he worked at Hewlett-Packard Company for 24 years in various positions including financial management, corporate finance, general management, and manufacturing. Mr. Gomo holds a master’s degree in Business Administration from Santa Clara University and a B.S. degree in Business Administration degree from Oregon State University.

Jeffry R. Allenwas appointed Executive Vice President, Business Operations, in August 2002. Previously he served as our Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations, infrom May 2000.2000 to August 2002. Mr. Allen served as our Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Secretary from December 1996 to May 2001.2000. From October 1994 to December 1996, Mr. Allen served in various capacities, including Senior Vice President of Operations and Vice President and Controller of Bay Networks, Inc. Prior to October 1994, Mr. Allen held various positions at SynOptics, Inc., the latest of which was Vice President and Controller. Before joining SynOptics, Inc., he held various positions at Hewlett-Packard Company, the latest of which was Controller of the Information Networks Group. Mr. Allen holds a B.S. degree from San Diego State University.

     David Hitz,co-founder of Network Appliance, was appointed Executive Vice President, Engineering, in May 2000 and has served as our Senior Vice President, Engineering, since February 2000. Mr. Hitz has served as our Vice President since April 1992. Prior to 1992, Mr. Hitz worked as a senior engineer at Auspex Systems, Inc., and held various engineering positions at MIPS Computer. Mr. Hitz holds a B.S. degree in computer science and electrical engineering from Princeton University.

     James K. Lau,co-founder of Network Appliance, was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer in May 2000. Mr. Lau has served as our Vice President, Chief Technical Officer, and Vice President of Engineering since April 1992. Prior to that, he served as Director of Software Development at

15


Auspex Systems, Inc. Prior to Auspex, he served as group manager of PC products at Bridge Communications, now known as 3Com. Mr. Lau holds a B.S. degree in computer science and mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley, and a master’s degree in computer engineering from Stanford University.

Risk Factors

     The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional

11


risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. Please see page [3] of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion of these forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Factors beyond our control could cause our quarterly results to fluctuate.

     We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Many of the factors that could cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly in the future are beyond our control and include, but are not limited to, the following:

 • changes in general economic conditions and specific economic conditions in the computer, storage, and networking industries;
 
 • general decrease in global corporate spending on information technology leading to a decline in demand for our products;
 
 • the effects of terrorist activity and international conflicts, which could lead to business interruptions and difficulty in forecasting;
 
 • the level of competition in our target product markets;
 
 • the size, timing, and cancellation of significant orders;
 
 • product configuration and mix;
 
 • the extent to which our customers renew their service and maintenance contracts with us;
 
 • market acceptance of new products and product enhancements;
 
 • announcements, introductions, and transitions of new products by us or our competitors;
 
 • deferrals of customer orders in anticipation of new products or product enhancements introduced by us or our competitors;
 
 • changes in pricing by us or our competitors;in response to competitive pricing actions;
 
 • our ability to develop, introduce, and market new products and enhancements in a timely manner;
 
 • supply constraints;
 
 • technological changes in our target product markets;
 
 • the levels of expenditure on research and development and sales and marketing programs;
 
 • our ability to achieve targeted cost reductions;
 
 • excess facilities;
• future accounting pronouncements and changes in accounting policies; and
 
 • seasonality.

     In addition, sales for any future quarter may vary and accordingly be inconsistent with our plans. We manufacture products based on a combination of specific order requirements and forecasts of our customer

16


demands. Products are typically shipped within one to four weeks following receipt of an order. In certain circumstances, customers may cancel or reschedule orders without penalty. Product sales are also difficult to forecast because the network storage market is rapidly evolving and our sales cycle varies substantially from customer to customer.

12


     Due to all of the foregoing factors, it is possible that in one or more future quarters our results may fall below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such event, the trading price of our common stock would likely decrease.

Our gross margins may vary based on the configuration of our products.

Our gross margins may vary based on the configuration of our products, and such variation may make it more difficult to forecast our earnings.

     We derive a significant portion of our sales from the resale of disk drives as components of our filers, and the resale market for hard disk drives is highly competitive and subject to intense pricing pressures. Our sales of disk drives generate lower gross margin percentages than those of our filer products. As a result, as we sell more highly configured systems with greater disk drive content, overall gross margin percentages willmay be negatively affected. Conversely, we believe our increased licensing of add-on software products may favorably impact gross margins.

     Our gross margins have been and may continue to be affected by a variety of other factors, including:

 • demand for storage and content delivery products;
 
 • discount levels and price competition;
 
 • direct versus indirect sales;
 
 • the mix ofproduct and add-on software as a percentage of revenue;mix;
 
 • the mix of services as a percentage of revenue;
 
 • the mix and average selling prices of products;
• the mix of disk content;
 
 • new product introductions and enhancements;
 
 • excess inventory purchase commitments as a result of changes in demand forecasts and possible product and software defects as we transition our products; and
 
 • the cost of components, manufacturing labor, and quality.

A significant percentage of our expenses are fixed, which could affect our net income.

     Our expense levels are based in part on our expectations as to future sales and a significant percentage of our expenses are fixed. As a result, if sales levels are below expectations or previously higher levels, net income will be disproportionately affected.

Costaffected in a material and expense control may be critical to maintaining positive cash flow from operations and profitability.adverse manner.

Cost and expense control may be critical to maintaining positive cash flow from operations and profitability.

     In fiscal 2002, we reduced fixed costs through workforce reductions and a consolidation of facilities. We believe strict cost containment is essential to maintaining positive cash flow from operations and remaining profitable in future quarters, especially since the outlook for future quarters is subject to numerous challenges.uncertain. Additional measures to reduce expenses may be undertaken if revenues and market conditions do not improve. A number of factors could preclude us from successfully bringing costs and expenses in line with our revenues, such as our inability to accurately forecast business activities and deterioration of our revenues. If we are not able to effectively control our costs and achieve an expense structure commensurate with our business activities and revenues, our cash flow and net income will be adversely affected.

Our future financial performance depends on growth in the network storage and content delivery markets, and any lack of growth will have a material adverse effect on our operating results.17


Our future financial performance depends on growth in the network storage and content delivery markets; if these markets do not continue to grow at the rates at which we forecast growth, our operating results will be materially and adversely impacted.

     All of our products address the storage and content delivery markets. Accordingly, our future financial performance will depend in large part on continued growth in the storage and content delivery markets and on our ability to adapt to emerging standards in these markets. We cannot assure you that the markets for storage and content delivery will continue to grow or that emerging standards in these markets will not adversely affect the growth of UNIX, Windows, and the World Wide Web server markets upon which we depend. In addition, our business also depends on general economic and business conditions. A reduction in demand for network

13


storage and content delivery caused by weakening economic conditions and decreases in corporate spending have resulted in decreased revenues and lower revenue growth rates. The network storage and content delivery market growth declined significantly beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, causing both our revenues and operating results to decline. If the network storage and content delivery markets grow more slowly than anticipated or if emerging standards other than those adopted by us become increasingly accepted by these markets, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The market price for our common stock has fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in the future.

     The market price for our common stock has experienced substantial volatility in the past, and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include:

 • fluctuations in our operating results;
 
 • fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
 
 • economic developments in the network storage market as a whole;
 
 • international conflicts and acts of terrorism;
 
 • a shortfall in revenues or earnings compared to securities analysts’ expectations;
 
 • changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections;
 
 • announcements of new products, applications or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
 
 • changes in our relationships with our suppliers, customers and strategic partners; and
 
 • general market conditions.

     In addition, the stock market has experienced volatility that has particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of many high-technology companies. Additionally, certain macroeconomic factors such as changes in interest rates, the market climate for the high-technology sector, and levels of corporate spending on information technology could also have an impact on the trading price of our stock. As a result, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future and any broad market decline, as well as our own operating results, may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If we are unable to develop and introduce new products and respond to technological change, or if our new products do not achieve market acceptance, or if we fail to manage the transition between our new and old products, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

If we are unable to develop and introduce new products and respond to technological change, if our new products do not achieve market acceptance, or if we fail to manage the transition between our new and old products, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

     Our future growth depends upon the successful development and introduction of new hardware and software products. Due to the complexity of storage subsystems and Internet caching devices, and the difficulty in gauging the engineering effort required to produce new products, such products are subject to significant technical risks. However, we cannot assure you that any of our new products will achieve market acceptance. Additional product introductions in future periods may also impact the sales of existing products. In addition, our new products must respond to technological changes and evolving industry standards. If we are unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products in a timely manner in

18


response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, or if such products do not achieve market acceptance, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

     In particular, in conjunction with the introduction of our product offerings in the block-datafabric-attached storage market, we have begun introducingintroduced products with new features and functionality that address the storage area network (SAN) market. During fiscal 2003, we introduced iSCSI-enabled unified storage solutions. We also introduced Direct Access File System (DAFS) protocol-capable products and NearStore backup and recovery products during fiscal 2002. We face risks relating to these product introductions, including risks relating to forecasting of demand for such products, as well as possible product and software defects and a potentially different sales and support environment associated with selling these new systems. If any of the foregoing occur, our operating results could be adversely affected.

14


As new or enhanced products are introduced, we must successfully manage the transition from older products in order to minimize disruption in customers’ ordering patterns, avoid excessive levels of older product inventories, and ensure that enough supplies of new products can be delivered to meet customers’ demands.

Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of a natural disaster, terrorist acts, or other catastrophic event.

Our operations, including our suppliers’ and contract manufacturers’ operations, are susceptible to outages due to fire, floods, power loss, power shortages, telecommunications failures, break-ins, and similar events. In addition, our headquarters are located in Northern California, an area susceptible to earthquakes. If any significant disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of war or acts of terrorism.impaired.

     Current global economic and political factors, including terrorism, could harm our business. Weak economic conditions or terrorist actions and the effects of ongoing military actions against terrorists could lead to significant business interruptions. If such disruptions result in cancellations of customer orders, a general decrease in corporate spending on information technology, or direct impacts on our marketing, manufacturing, financial functions, or our suppliers’ logistics function, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We depend on attracting and retaining qualified technical and sales personnel.

We depend on attracting and retaining qualified technical and sales personnel; if we are unable to attract and retain such personnel, our operating results could be materially and adversely impacted.

     Our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to identify, attract, motivate, and retain qualified technical and sales personnel. Because our future success is dependent on our ability to continue to enhance and introduce new products, we are particularly dependent on our ability to identify, attract, motivate, and retain qualified engineers with the requisite education, backgrounds, and industry experience. CompetitionIn spite of the economic downturn, competition for qualified engineers, particularly in Silicon Valley, iscan be intense. The loss of the services of a significant number of our engineers or sales people could be disruptive to our development efforts or business relationships and could materially adversely affect our operating results.

Risks inherent in our international operations could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Risks inherent in our international operations could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

     We conduct business internationally. For fiscal 2002,2003, approximately 42.0%42.1% of our total revenues were from international customers (including United StatesU.S. exports). Accordingly, our future operating results could be materially adversely affected by a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including regulatory, political, or economic conditions in a specific country or region, trade protection measures and other regulatory requirements, government spending patterns, and acts of terrorism and international conflicts.

     Our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and in foreign currencies. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and, therefore, potentially less competitive in foreign markets. For international sales and expenditures denominated in foreign currencies, we are subject to risks associated with currency fluctuations. We hedge risks associated with foreign currency transactions in order to minimize the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on earnings. We utilize forward contracts to hedge trade our currency exposure associated with certain assets

19


and intercompany receivables and payables.liabilities as well as anticipated foreign currency cash flow. All hedge contractsbalance sheet hedges are marked to market through earnings every period.period, while gains and losses on cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income. There can be no assurance that such hedging strategy will be successful and that currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

     Additional risks inherent in our international business activities generally include, among others, longer accounts receivable payment cycles, difficulties in managing international operations, and potentially adverse tax consequences. Such factors could materially adversely affect our future international sales and, consequently, our operating results.

     Although operating results have not been materially adversely affected by seasonality in the past, because of the significant seasonal effects experienced within the industry, particularly in Europe, our future operating results could be materially adversely affected by seasonality.

     We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.

15


An increase in competition could materially adversely affect our operating results.

An increase in competition could materially adversely affect our operating results.

     The storage and content delivery markets are intensely competitive and are characterized by rapidly changing technology.

     In the storage market, our filerFAS appliances and data management software compete primarily against storage products and data management software from EMC Corporation, Hitachi Data Systems, Hewlett-Packard Company (including the integrated Compaq Computer Corporation), IBM Corporation, and Sun Microsystems, Inc. We have also historically encountered less-frequent competition from companies including Auspex Systems, Inc., Dell, LSI Logic Corp., MTI Corp., Procom Technology and Procom Technology.Silicon Graphics, Inc.

     In the content delivery market, our NetCache appliances and content delivery software compete against caching appliance and content delivery software vendors including Akamai Technologies, Inc., BlueCoat Systems (formerly Cacheflow, Inc.) and Cisco Systems, Inc., CacheFlow, Inc., Inktomi Corp., and Akamai Technologies, Inc.

     Additionally a number of new, privately held companies are currently attempting to enter ourthe storage and content delivery markets, some of which may become significant competitors in the future.

     We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting our marketthe storage and content delivery markets include product benefits such as response time, reliability, data availability, scalability, ease of use, price, multiprotocol capabilities, and customer service and support. Although we believe that our products currently compete favorably with respect to these factors, we cannot assure you that we can maintain our competitive position against current and potential competitors, especially those with significantly greater financial, marketing, service, support, technical, and other resources.

     Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, and loss of market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our operating results. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale, and support of their products. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. Competitive pressures we face could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers and any disruption or termination of these supply arrangements could delay shipment of our products and could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers, and any disruption or termination of these supply arrangements could delay shipment of our products and could materially adversely affect our operating results.

     We rely on a limited number of suppliers of several key components utilized in the assembly of our products. We purchase most of our disk drives through a single supplier. We purchase computer boards and

20


microprocessors from a limited number of suppliers. Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers involves several risks, including:

 • a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components because we do not have long-term supply commitments;
 
 • supplier capacity constraints;
 
 • price increases;
 
 • timely delivery; and
 
 • component quality.

     Component quality is particularly significant with respect to our suppliers of disk drives. In order to meet product performance requirements, we must obtain disk drives of extremely high quality and capacity. In addition, there are periodic supply-and-demand issues for disk drives, microprocessors, and for semiconductor memory components, which could result in component shortages, selective supply allocations, and increased prices of such components. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain our full requirements of such

16


components in the future or that prices of such components will not increase. In addition, problems with respect to yield and quality of such components and timeliness of deliveries could occur. Disruption or termination of the supply of these components could delay shipments of our products and could materially adversely affect our operating results. Such delays could also damage relationships with current and prospective customers.

     In addition, we license certain technology and software from third parties that is incorporated into our products. If we are unable to obtain or license the technology and software on a timely basis, we will not be able to deliver product to our customers in a timely manner.

 
The loss of our soleany contract manufacturermanufacturers or the failure to accurately forecast demand for our products or successfully manage our relationship with our contract manufacturermanufacturers could negatively impact our ability to manufacture and sell our products.

     We currently rely on aseveral contract manufacturermanufacturers to manufacture most of our products. Our reliance on aour third-party contract manufacturermanufacturers reduces our control over the manufacturing process, exposing us to risks including reduced control over quality assurance, production costs, and product supply. If we should fail to effectively manage our relationship with our contract manufacturer,manufacturers, or if our contract manufacturer experiencesmanufacturers experience delays, disruptions, capacity constraints, or quality control problems in itstheir manufacturing operations, our ability to ship products to our customers could be delayedimpaired and our competitive position and reputation could be harmed. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing volume production are expensive and time-consuming. If we are required to change contract manufacturers or assume internal manufacturing operations, we may lose revenue and damage our customer relationships. If we inaccurately forecast demand for our products, we may have excess or inadequate inventory, or incur cancellation charges or penalties, which could adversely impact our operating results.

     We intend to regularly introduce new products and product enhancements, which will require us to rapidly achieve volume production by coordinating with our contract manufacturermanufacturers and suppliers. We may need to increase our material purchases, contract manufacturing capacity, and internal test and quality functions to meet anticipated demand. The inability of our contract manufacturermanufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of high-quality products, or the abilityinability to obtain raw materials, could cause a delay in our ability to fulfill orders.

 
If we are unable to maintain our existing relationships and develop new relationships with major strategic partners, our revenue may be impacted negatively.

     An element of our strategy to enhance revenue is to strategically partner with major third-party software and hardware vendors who integrate our products into their products and also comarket our products. A number of these strategic partners are industry leaders that offer us expanded access to segments of the storage

21


market. There is intense competition for attractive strategic partners, and even if we can establish strategic relationships with these partners, we cannot assure you that these partnerships will generate significant revenue or that the partnerships will continue to be in effect for any specific period of time.

We intend to continue to establish and maintain business relationships with technology companies to accelerate the development and marketing of our storage solutions. To the extent we are unsuccessful in developing new relationships and maintaining our existing relationships, our future revenue and operating results could be impacted negatively. In addition, the loss of a strategic partner could have a material adverse effect on the progress of new products under development with that partner.

We may incur problems with current or future equity investments and acquisitions, and these investments may not achieve our objectives.

     From time to time, we make equity investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. We have already made strategic investments in a number of network storage-related technology companies. Equity investments may result in the loss of investment capital. The market price and valuation of our equity investments in these companies may fluctuate due to market conditions and other circumstances over which we have little or no control, and recent events have adversely affected the public equity market. To the extent that the fair value of these securities is less than our cost over an extended period of time, our results of operations and financial position could be negatively impacted. In fiscal 2003, we recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary write-down of $0.7 million related to the impairment of our investment in a publicly traded company. In the second quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $13.0 million related to impairments of our investments in publicly traded and private companies.

     As part of our strategy, we are continuously evaluating opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that would complement our current products, expand the breadth of our markets, or enhance our technical capabilities. We have acquired two companies since the beginning of fiscal 2001. We may engage in future acquisitions that dilute our stockholders’ investments and cause us to use cash, to incur debt, or to assume contingent liabilities.

     Acquisitions of companies entail numerous risks, and we may not be able to successfully integrate acquired operations and products or to realize anticipated synergies, economies of scale, or other value. In addition, we may experience a diversion of management’s attention, the loss of key employees of acquired

17


operations, or the inability to recover strategic investments in development stage entities. Any such problems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.

In addition, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 142“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. As of May 1, 2002, the fair value for each of our reporting units exceeded the reporting unit’s carrying amount and no impairment was recognized. On an ongoing basis, goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment (or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise). As of April 30, 2003, there had been no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. There can be no assurance that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings. See Note 13 under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 
We do not have exclusive relationships with our resellers and accordingly there is a risk that those resellers may give higher priority to products of other suppliers, which could materially adversely affect our operating results.

     Our reseller partners generally offer products from several different companies, including products of our competitors. Accordingly, there is risk that these resellers may give higher priority to products of other suppliers, which could materially adversely affect our operating results.

22


 
Undetected software, hardware errors, or failures found in new products may result in loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products, which could materially adversely affectincrease our operating results.costs and reduce our revenues.

     Our products may contain undetected software, hardware errors, or failures when first introduced or as new versions are released. Despite testing by us and by current and potential customers, errors may not be found in new products until after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or delay in market acceptance, which could materially adversely affect our operating results.

 
If actual results or events differ materially from those contemplated by us in making estimates and assumptions, our reported financial condition and results of operation for future periods could be materially affected.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosure in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to establish policies that contain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies essential to preparing our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual future results may differ materially from these estimates. We evaluate, on an ongoing basis, our estimates and assumptions. In addition, see our Critical Accounting Policies under Item 7.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may be subject to increased competition that could materially adversely affect our operating results.

     Our success depends significantly upon our proprietary technology. We currently rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions, and patents to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our software, documentation, and other written materials under trade secret, copyright, and patent laws, which afford only limited protection. Some United StatesU.S. trademarks and some United States-registeredU.S.-registered trademarks are registered internationally as well. We will continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as appropriate. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and with our resellers, strategic partners, and customers. We currently have multiple United StatesU.S. and international patent applications pending and multiple United StatesU.S. patents issued. The pending applications may not be approved and if patents are issued, such patents may be challenged. If such challenges are brought, the patents may be invalidated. We cannot assure you that we will develop proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that any issued patent will provide us with any competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties, or that the patents of others will not materially adversely affect our ability to do business.

     Litigation may be necessary to protect our proprietary technology. Any such litigation may be time-consuming and costly. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States.U.S. We cannot assure you that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products, or design around patents issued to us or other intellectual property rights of ours.

     We are subject to intellectual property infringement claims. We may, from time to time, receive claims that we are infringing third parties’ intellectual property rights. Third parties may in the future claim infringement by us with respect to current or future products, patents, trademarks, or other proprietary rights. We expect that companies in the appliance market will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. Any such claims could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays, require us to redesign our products or require us to enter into royalty or

23


licensing agreements, any of which could materially adversely affect our operating results. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

18


Item 2.Properties

Item 2.Properties

     In fiscal 2002, we terminated our operating lease obligations for our Sunnyvale headquarters site by purchasing the land and buildings for $249.8 million.     Our headquarters site for corporate general administration, sales and marketing, research and development, customer services, and manufacturing operations occupies approximately 675,000 square feet of buildings in Sunnyvale, California. In fiscal 2002, we terminated our operating lease obligations for our Sunnyvale headquarters site by purchasing the land and buildings for $249.8 million.

     We lease other sales offices and research and development facilities throughout the United StatesU.S. and internationally. We believe that our existing facilities and those being developed in Sunnyvale are adequate for our requirements over at least the next two years and that additional space will be available as needed.

     As a result of reductions in headcount in fiscal 2002, we are not currently utilizing certain existing space in our California headquarters site. Additionally, we have also exited office space under noncancellable leases in other locations, both in the United StatesU.S. and Europe. If we are unable to successfully sublease our vacated and unoccupied office space, our operating results may be adversely affected. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     See additional discussion regarding properties in “Note 4 under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Item 3.Legal ProceedingsLegal Proceedings

     We are subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We defend ourselves vigorously against any such claims. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 4.Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersSubmissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder MattersMarket for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     Our common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq National Market on November 21, 1995, and is traded under the symbol “NTAP.” As of April 26, 2002,25, 2003, there were 9441,016 holders of record of the common stock. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.

                        
Fiscal 2002Fiscal 2001Fiscal 2003Fiscal 2002




HighLowHighLowHighLowHighLow








First Quarter $28.21 $9.88 $112.56 $57.94  $18.04 $9.25 $28.21 $9.88 
Second Quarter 15.27 6.54 148.63 76.94  10.64 5.63 15.27 6.54 
Third Quarter 26.89 11.78 121.00 49.38  14.35 8.92 26.89 11.78 
Fourth Quarter 21.74 15.32 59.94 11.81  14.88 9.40 21.74 15.32 

     We believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. See “Item 1. Business — Risk Factors.”

     We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently anticipate retaining all available funds, if any, to finance internal growth and product development.development as well as other management initiatives, including stock repurchases and acquisitions. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our

24


earnings and financial condition and such other factors as the directors may consider or deem appropriate at the time.

19


Item 6.Selected Consolidated Financial DataSelected Consolidated Financial Data

Five fiscal years ended April 30, 20022003

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)
                   
20032002200120001999
                    




20022001200019991998





(In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Total Revenues $798,369 $1,006,186 $579,300 $289,420 $166,163  $892,068 $798,369 $1,006,186 $579,300 $289,420 
Income (Loss) from Operations (1,062) 109,657 105,368 55,126 32,658  87,606 (1,062) 109,657 105,368 55,126 
Net Income 3,033 74,886 73,792 35,613 20,965  76,472 3,033 74,886 73,792 35,613 
Net Income per Share, basic 0.01 0.23 0.25 0.13 0.08 
Net Income per Share, diluted 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.07 
Net Income per Share, Basic 0.23 0.01 0.23 0.25 0.13 
Net Income per Share, Diluted 0.22 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.11 
Total Assets 1,108,806 1,036,252 592,233 346,347 115,736  1,319,173 1,108,806 1,036,252 592,233 346,347 
Long-Term Deferred Revenue and Other 34,770 13,031 333 93 163  66,800 34,770 13,031 333 93 
Total Stockholders’ Equity 858,476 804,448 478,746 295,724 86,265  987,357 858,476 804,448 478,746 295,724 

     All Net Income per Share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock splits which were effective November 11, 1997, December 21, 1998, December 20, 1999 and March 22, 2000.

20


 
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and the related notes set forth under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and the Risk Factors set forth in “Item 1. Business.”

     Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

     We maintain a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and will promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. Our code of business practices addresses conflicts of interest; confidentiality; compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider trading laws); and related matters.

Critical Accounting Policies

     Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.disclosure. We evaluate, on an ongoing basis, our estimates and judgments, including those related to sales returns, bad debts, excess inventory and purchase commitments, investments, intangible assets, lease losses and restructuring accruals, income taxes, and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

     We believe the accounting policies described below, among others, are the ones that most frequently require us to make estimates and judgments, and therefore are critical to the understanding of our results of operations:

 • revenue recognition and allowances;
 
 • inventory write-down;
 
 • restructuring accruals and accruals;

25


• loss contingencies;
• impairment losses on investments;
 
 • valuation of intangible assets and goodwill;accounting for stock-based compensation; and
 
 • accounting for income taxes.

Revenue recognition and allowances

     Revenue Recognition and Allowances

     We apply the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”)SOP 97-2, “Software“Software Revenue Recognition” (as amended by SOP 98-4 and SOP 98-9), and related interpretations to all revenue transactions. We recognize revenue when:

Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement Exists.It is our customary practice to have a purchase order prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.

Delivery Has Occurred.Our product is physically delivered to our customers, generally with standard transfer terms as FOB shipping point. Products shipped with acceptance criteria or return rights are not recognized as revenue until all criteria are achieved. If undelivered products or services exist that are essential to the functionality of the delivered product in an arrangement, delivery is not considered to have occurred.

The Fee Is Fixed or Determinable.Arrangements with payment terms extending beyond our standard terms and condition practices are not considered to be fixed or determinable. Revenue from such arrangements is recognized as the fees become due and payable.

Collection Is Probable.Probability of collection is assessed on a customer-by-customer basis. Customers are subjected
• Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement Exists.It is our customary practice to have a purchase order prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.
• Delivery has Occurred.Our product is physically delivered to our customers, generally with standard transfer terms as FOB shipping point. Products shipped with acceptance criteria or return rights are not recognized as revenue until all criteria are achieved. If undelivered products or services exist that are essential to the functionality of the delivered product in an arrangement, delivery is not considered to have occurred.
• The Fee is Fixed or Determinable.Arrangements with payment terms extending beyond our standard terms and condition practices are not considered to be fixed or determinable. Revenue from such arrangements is recognized as the fees become due and payable.
• Collection is Probable.Probability of collection is assessed on a customer-by-customer basis. Customers are subject to a credit review process that evaluates the customers’ financial position and ultimately their ability to pay. If it is determined from the outset of an arrangement that collection is not probable based upon our review process, revenue is recognized upon cash receipt.

     For arrangements with multiple elements, we allocate revenue to each element using the residual method based on vendor specific objective evidence of the undelivered items. We defer the portion of the arrangement fee equal to the fair value of the undelivered elements until they are delivered. Vendor specific objective evidence is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately.

21


     A typical arrangement includes product, software subscription, and maintenance. Some arrangements include training and consulting. Software subscriptions include unspecified productsproduct upgrades and enhancements on a when-and-if-available basis, bug fixes, and patch releases, and are included in product revenues. Service maintenance includes contracts for technical support and hardware maintenance. Revenue from software subscriptions and maintenanceservice is recognized ratably over the contractual term, generally one to three years. Revenue from training and consulting is recognized as the services are performed.

     We record reductions to revenue for estimated sales returns at the time of shipment. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, changes in customer demand, and other factors. If actual future returns and allowances differ from past experience, additional allowances may be required.

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     We also maintain a separate allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting frombased on our assessment of the inabilitycollectibility of our customers to make required payments.specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. We analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer solvency, current economic and geographic trends, and changes in customer payment terms and practices when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Inventory write-down26


     Inventory Write-down

     We write-downwrite down inventory and record purchase commitment liabilities for estimated excess and obsolete inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated fair value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Although we strive to ensure thefor accuracy ofin our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and commitments, and our reported results. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected, additional write-downs and other charges against earnings may be required. If actual market conditions are more favorable, we may realize higher gross margin in the period when the written-down inventory is sold.

     We engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers. We also provide for the estimated cost of known product failures based on known quality issues when they arise. Should actual cost of product failure differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated liability would be required.

Restructuring accruals and impairment losses on investments

     Restructuring Accruals

     In fiscal 2002, as a result of continuing unfavorable economic conditions and a reduction in IT spending rates, we implemented two restructuring plans, which included reductions in workforce and a consolidation of facilities.

     We performed These restructuring accruals were accounted for in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3,Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a comprehensive analysis of our real estate facility requirementsRestructuring), and identified excess facility space, which has subsequently been offered for sublease. Based upon the results of this analysis, during fiscal 2002, we recorded charges related to estimated facilities lease losses, net of expected sublease income. In determining the net facilities charge,included various assumptions were made, includingsuch as the time period over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease terms, and expected sublease rates. The charges recorded were estimates in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and represented the low end of an estimated range that may be adjusted upon the occurrence of future triggering events. Triggering events may include, but are not limited to, changes in estimated time to sublease the facilities, sublease terms, sublease rates, and lease termination. Should operating lease rental rates decline or should it take longer than expected to find a suitable tenant to sublease the facility, adjustments to the facilities lease losses liabilities may be necessary in future periods based upon the then-current actual events and circumstances. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we purchased our Sunnyvale headquarters site and terminated the operating leases. As a result, an adjustment was made to reduce the previously recorded estimated facilities lease losses by $1.5 million.

In fiscal 2002, we also recorded charges for a reduction in workforce in response to a decline in customer demand and macroeconomic conditions. See footnote 12 —Restructuring Charges for further discussion.

22


These estimates are reviewed and revised quarterlyperiodically and may result in a substantial change to restructuring expense should different conditions prevail than were anticipated in original management estimates. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
     Loss Contingencies

     We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of the loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset has been impaired and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.

     Impairment Losses on Investments

     We perform periodic reviews of our investments for impairment. Our investments in publicly held companies are generally considered impaired when a decline in the fair value of an investment as measured by quoted market prices is less than its carrying value, and such a decline is not considered temporary. Our investments in privately held companies are considered impaired when a review of the investees’ operations and other indicators of impairment indicate that the carrying value of the investment is not likely to be recoverable. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of receiving additional financing, and limited prospects for liquidity of the related securities. DuringIn the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary write-down of $0.7 million related to impairments of our investments in a publicly traded company. In the second quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded a noncash,non-cash, other-than-temporary write-down of $13.0 million related to impairments of our investments in publicly traded and private companies. See footnote 2 —Short-Term InvestmentsandInvestments

Accounting for Stock-based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation in Nonpublic Companiesaccordance with the provisions of Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB” No. 25),Accounting for further discussion.Stock Issued to Employees, and comply with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123“Accounting for

27


ValuationStock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosures.Deferred compensation recognized under APB No. 25 is amortized to expense using the graded vesting method. We account for stock options issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of intangible assetsSFAS No. 123 and goodwill

     We periodically evaluate our intangible assets and goodwill for indications of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate thatEITF No. 96-18 under the carrying value may not be recoverable. Intangible assets include goodwill, purchased technology, and workforce. Factors we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business, or significant negative industry or economic trends. If these criteria indicate that the value of the intangible asset may be impaired, an evaluation of the recoverability of the net carrying value of the asset over its remaining useful life is made. If this evaluation indicates that the intangible asset is not recoverable, based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the entity or technology acquired over the remaining amortization period, the net carrying value of the related intangible asset will be reduced to fair value and the remaining amortization period may be adjusted. Any such impairment charge could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our reported financial statements if and when an impairment charge is recorded. If an impairment charge is recognized, the amortization related to goodwill and other intangible assets would decrease during the remainder of the fiscal year. No impairment losses were recorded during fiscal 2002 based on these measurements.

Accounting for income taxesmethod.

     Accounting for Income Taxes

     The determination of our tax provision is subject to judgments and estimates due to operations in several tax jurisdictions outside the United States. Sales toU.S. Earnings derived from our international customersbusiness are generally taxed at rates that are lower than U.S. rates, resulting in a reduction of our effective tax rate. The ability to maintain our current effective tax rate is contingent upon existing tax laws in both the United StatesU.S. and in the respective countries in which our international subsidiaries are located. Future changes in domestic or international tax laws could affect the continued realization of the tax benefits we are currently receiving and expect to receive from international sales.business. In addition, a decrease in the percentage of our total revenueearnings from our international customersbusiness or in the mix of international revenuebusiness among particular tax jurisdictions could increase our overall effective tax rate. Also, our current effective tax rate assumes that U.S. income taxes are not provided for undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. These earnings could become subject to incremental foreign withholding or federal and state income taxes should they be either deemed or actually remitted to the U.S.

     The carrying value of our net deferred tax assets, which is made up primarily of income tax deductions, credits, and net operating loss carryforwards resulting from stock option exercises, assumes that we will be able to generate sufficient future income to fully utilize these tax deductions and credits. If we do not generate sufficient future income, the realization of these deferred tax assets may be impaired resulting in additional income tax expense. We have provided a valuation allowance on certain of our deferred tax assets because of uncertainty regarding their realizability due to expectation of future employee stock option exercises.

23


New Accounting Standards

     On May 1, 2001, we adopted SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

In June 2001,2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,146,“Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under SFAS146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally EITF Issue No. 141, all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 must be accounted for using94-3. The Company adopted the purchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment (or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise). Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired146 for restructuring activities initiated after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, we are required to adoptDecember 31, 2002. SFAS No. 142 effective May 1, 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we will stop146 requires that the amortization of goodwill (including acquired existing workforce)liability for costs associated with a net carrying value of approximately $49.8 million at April 30, 2002, and the annual amortization of $15.2 million that resulted from business combinations initiated prior to the adoption. We will evaluate goodwill under the SFAS No. 142 transitional impairment test. Any transitional impairment loss willan exit or disposal activity be recognized aswhen the liability is incurred. Under EITF Issue No. 94-3, a change in accounting principle onliability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of adoption. We havethe Company’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45,“Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 requires certain guarantees to be recorded at fair value and requires a guarantor to make disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee is remote. For those guarantees and indemnifications that do not determined whetherfall within initial recognition and measurement requirements of FIN 45, the Company must continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the guarantees and indemnifications, as required under existing generally accepted accounting principles, to identify if a loss has been incurred. If the Company determines that it is probable that a loss has been incurred, any such estimable loss would be recognized. The initial recognition and measurement requirements do not apply to the Company’s product warranties or to the provisions contained in the majority of the Company’s software license agreements that indemnify licensees of the Company’s software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that the Company’s software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. The Company has provided disclosures for the year ended April 30, 2003 as required by FIN 45 in Note 14 to its consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 142the liability recognition provisions to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

28


In December 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 00-21,“Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.”This issue addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. In some arrangements, the different revenue-generating activities (deliverables) are sufficiently separable and there exists sufficient evidence of their fair values to separately account for some or all of the deliverables (that is, there are separate units of accounting). In other arrangements, some or all of the deliverables are not independently functional, or there is not sufficient evidence of their fair values to account for them separately. This issue addresses when and, if so, how an arrangement involving multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting. This issue does not change otherwise applicable revenue recognition criteria. The guidance in this issue is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect that the adoption of EITF 00-21 will have an impacta material effect on ourits consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flow.statements.

     In October 2001,December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment to FASB Statement 123.” SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting of stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 effective April 30, 2003.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”),“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 requires an investor with a majority of the variable interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A variable interest entity is an entity in which the equity investors do not have a controlling interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from the other parties. The Company does not expect to identify any variable interest entities that must be consolidated.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Assets to Be Disposed Of.” Adoption149,“Amendment of SFAS No. 144133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. In particular, this Statement clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative. It also clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component that warrants special reporting in the statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is requiredgenerally effective for our fiscal yearcontracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and is not expected to have an impact on the Company upon adoption.

In May 2003, the FASB has issued SFAS No. 150,“Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” The Statement improves the accounting for certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity. The new Statement requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of financial position. This statement is effective for interim periods beginning May 1, 2002. We areafter June 15, 2003. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impacteffect of this statement on its consolidated financial statement. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 144150 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Non-Audit Services Provided by Independent Auditors

     During fiscal 2003, our financial positionindependent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, performed the following non-audit services that have been approved by our Audit Committee of the Board of Directors: local statutory audits and results of operations and have not yet determinedcertain taxation matters. See more detailed disclosure in the impact of adopting this statement.Proxy Statement.

2429


Results of Operations

     The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:

                    
Years Ended April 30,Year Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Revenues:Revenues: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Revenues: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Product Revenue 91.4 95.2 96.2 Product revenue 89.9 91.4 95.2 
Service Revenue 8.6 4.8 3.8 Service revenue 10.1 8.6 4.8 
Cost of Revenues: 
Cost of revenues:Cost of revenues: 
Cost of Product Revenue 32.8 34.0 35.8 Cost of product revenue 31.3 33.5 34.2 
Cost of Service Revenue 7.0 5.9 4.9 Cost of service revenue 7.4 7.0 6.0 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Gross ProfitGross Profit 60.2 60.1 59.3 Gross Profit 61.3 59.5 59.8 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Operating Expenses:Operating Expenses: Operating Expenses: 
Sales and Marketing 35.6 28.7 26.6 Sales and marketing 34.2 35.6 28.7 
Research and Development 14.6 12.0 10.6 Research and development 12.7 14.6 12.0 
General and Administrative 5.1 4.0 3.6 General and administrative 4.1 5.1 4.0 
Amortization of Intangible Assets 2.6 1.2  Amortization of goodwill  1.9 0.9 
In-process Research and Development  2.7  In process research and development   2.7 
Stock Compensation 0.9 0.6 0.3 Stock compensation 0.4 0.9 0.6 
Restructuring Charges 1.5   Restructuring charges 0.1 1.5  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total Operating Expenses 60.3 49.2 41.1  Total Operating Expenses 51.5 59.6 48.9 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income (Loss) from Operations (0.1) 10.9 18.2 
Other Income (Expense), Net 0.4 2.3 1.5 
Income (Loss) From OperationsIncome (Loss) From Operations 9.8 (0.1) 10.9 
Other Income (Expense), net:Other Income (Expense), net: 
Interest income 1.4 2.2 2.2 
Other income (expense), net (0.2) (0.2) 0.1 
Net loss on investments (0.1) (1.6)  
Gain on sale of intangible asset 0.1   
 
 
 
 
 Total other income, net 1.2 0.4 2.3 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income Before Income TaxesIncome Before Income Taxes 0.3 13.2 19.7 Income Before Income Taxes 11.0 0.3 13.2 
Provision (Benefit) for Income TaxesProvision (Benefit) for Income Taxes (0.1) 5.8 7.0 Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes 2.4 (0.1) 5.8 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net IncomeNet Income 0.4% 7.4% 12.7%Net Income 8.6% 0.4% 7.4%
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

Product revenues — Product revenues increased by 9.9% to $802.3 million in fiscal 2003, from $729.9 million in fiscal 2002. Product revenues growth was across all geographies. This increase in product revenues was specifically attributable to increased software licenses and software subscriptions and an increase in units shipped, as compared to the prior year.

     Our revenue growth was primarily driven by new product innovation as we continue to enhance and extend our full-line enterprise portfolio, providing customers with a lower overall cost of ownership. We expanded both our customer base and strategic partnerships with enterprise infrastructure providers and gained market acceptance for our new and expanded unified storage, NearStore and NetCache products. We believe our competitive advantage is a result of lower total cost of ownership from a combination of four factors: lower acquisition cost, reduced administrative overhead, minimized service cost, and reduced downtime of critical business applications.

30


     Product revenues were favorably impacted by the following factors:

• increased sales from industry verticals, including energy, telecommunications, financial services, manufacturing, life sciences, and the government;
• a higher average selling price for our newer products: FAS960, FAS940, F825 filer, F87 filer, C2100 and C1200 NetCache products, as well as NearStore R100 and R150 nearline storage systems and software features;
• data management software offering a unique set of features to enable mission-critical availability, while reducing the complexity of enterprise storage management;
• higher sales of software subscription upgrades, representing 8.4% and 6.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively;
• increased revenues from our new product introductions such as: FAS960, FAS940, F825, F810 and F87 filer products; NearStore R100 and R150 systems; and NetCache C2100 and C1200 appliances; and
• increased sales through indirect channels, including sales through our OEM partners, representing 46.5% and 39.1% of total revenues for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     Product revenues were negatively impacted by the following factors:

• continued weakness in demand for our products resulting from unfavorable economic conditions and capital spending environment;
• continued weakness in technology spending from Internet- and technology-related customers;
• decreased cost per megabyte as a result of larger disk capacity; and
• declining average selling price and unit sales of our older filer and caching products.

Service revenues — Service revenues, which include hardware support, professional services, and educational services, increased by 31.2% to $89.8 million in fiscal 2003, from $68.5 million in fiscal 2002. Service revenues are generally deferred and, in most cases, recognized ratably over the service period obligations, which are typically one to three years. The increase in service revenues (representing 10.1% and 8.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively) was due to an increasing number of enterprise customers, who typically purchase more complete service packages. Higher service revenues was also related to a growing installed base resulting in new customer support contracts in addition to support contract renewals by existing customers. While it is an element of our strategy to expand and offer a more comprehensive, global enterprise support and service solution, we cannot assure you that service revenue will grow at the current rate in fiscal 2004.

     International total revenues (including U.S. exports) increased by 11.9% for fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002. International total revenues were $375.2 million, or 42.1% of total revenues for fiscal 2003. The increase in international sales for fiscal 2003 was primarily a result of European and Asia Pacific net revenues growth, driven by larger storage implementations and new products, and positive foreign exchange effects from a weak U.S. dollar, as compared to the prior year.

Product gross margin — Product gross margin increased to 65.1% of product revenues for fiscal 2003 as compared to 63.3% in fiscal 2002. Amortization of existing technology included in cost of product revenue was $5.5 and $5.7 million, respectively, for fiscal 2003 and 2002. For fiscal 2004, estimated future amortization expense is $3.0 million and none thereafter.

     Product gross margin was favorably impacted by:

• favorable product and add-on software mix;
• competitive pricing solutions with our core filer products bundled with software features;
• higher average selling prices for our new products;

31


• growth in software subscription upgrades and software licenses due primarily to a larger installed base and an increasing number of new enterprise customers; and
• manufacturing cost management.

     Product gross margin was negatively impacted by:

• increased sales through indirect channels;
• higher disk content with an expanded storage capacity for the higher-end products;
• sales price reductions due to competitive pricing pressure and selective pricing discounts;
• lower average selling price of certain add-on software options.

Service gross margin — Service gross margin increased to 26.5% for fiscal 2003 compared to 18.2% for fiscal 2002. Investments in customer service increased by 17.8% to $66.0 million in fiscal 2003 from $56.0 million in fiscal 2002. The improvement in service gross margin in fiscal 2003 was primarily due to operational and cost efficiencies in the global customer service organizations, combined with the ramping up of our service infrastructure in fiscal 2002 in anticipation of service revenue growth.

Sales and marketing — Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, advertising and promotional expenses, and certain customer service and support costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased 7.0% to $304.2 million for fiscal 2003, from $284.4 million for fiscal 2002. These expenses were 34.2% and 35.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively. The increase was attributed to the continued worldwide investment in our sales and customer service organizations associated with selling complete solutions at the enterprise level, marketing and various advertising programs, and expenses associated with our growing mix of enterprise customers and associated global account programs. Sales and marketing headcount decreased to 1,199 in fiscal 2003, from 1,224 in fiscal 2002.

     We expect to continue to selectively add sales capacity in an effort to expand domestic and international markets, introduce new products, establish and expand new distribution channels, and increase product and company awareness. We expect to increase our sales and marketing expenses commensurate with future revenue growth.

Research and development — Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, prototype expenses, non-recurring engineering charges, and fees paid to outside consultants. Research and development expenses decreased 3.3% to $112.9 million in fiscal 2003, from $116.7 million in fiscal 2002. These expenses represented 12.7% and 14.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively. Research and development expenses decreased in absolute dollars, primarily as a result of cost control, reduction in discretionary spending efforts, the impact of fiscal 2002 restructuring activities. Research and development headcount increased to 526 in fiscal 2003, from 514 in fiscal 2002. We expect to continuously support current and future product development and enhancement efforts, and incur prototyping expenses and non-recurring engineering charges associated with the development of new products and technologies.

     We believe that our future performance will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and enhance our current product line, develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of customer requirements. We intend to continuously expand our existing product offerings and introduce new products, and expect that expenditures for these purposes will increase in absolute dollars. For both fiscal 2003 and 2002, no software development costs were capitalized.

General and administrative — General and administrative expenses decreased 8.4% to $36.8 million in fiscal 2003, from $40.2 million in fiscal 2002. These expenses represented 4.1% and 5.1% of total revenues for fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively. Decreases in absolute dollars were primarily due to cost control, reduction in discretionary spending efforts, the successful collection of previously accrued customer-specific bad debt allowances, partially offset by expenses associated with initiatives to enhance and implement an enterprise-wide ERP system. General and administrative headcount increased to 283 in fiscal 2003 from 246 in fiscal 2002. We believe that our general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars in fiscal 2004 due to the investment in our enterprise-wide ERP system and expanded regulatory requirements.

32


Amortization of Goodwill — Due to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized in fiscal 2003 as compared to amortization expense of $15.2 million in fiscal 2002.

Stock compensation — We account for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of APB No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for non-employee compensation awards. Accordingly, we recognize the intrinsic value for employees and the fair value for non-employees as stock compensation expense over the vesting terms of the awards. Stock compensation expenses were $3.6 million and $7.2 million in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to $2.2 million of lower deferred stock compensation amortization in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 attributed to forfeitures of unvested options assumed in the WebManage acquisition; a decrease of $2.1 million of stock compensation as 165,310 contingently issuable milestone shares relating to Orca valued at $3.0 million were released in fiscal 2002 as compared to the release of 99,186 shares valued at $0.9 million in fiscal 2003; offset by an increase of $0.7 million relating to the fair value of options granted to a member of the Board of Directors. Estimated future deferred stock compensation amortization relating to assumed WebManage unvested options and deferred salary investment options for fiscal 2004 are expected to be $1.2 million. For fiscal 2005, estimated future stock compensation amortization expenses are $0.2 million and none thereafter.

Restructuring charges — In fiscal 2002, as a result of continuing unfavorable economic conditions and a reduction in IT spending rates, we implemented two restructuring plans, which included reductions in workforce and a consolidation of facilities.

Fiscal 2002 Second Quarter Restructuring Plan

     In August 2001, we implemented the first restructuring plan, which included a reduction in workforce by approximately 200 employees and a consolidation of facilities. The action was required to properly align and manage the business commensurate with our then current revenue levels. All functional areas of the Company were affected by the reduction. We completed our actions during the second quarter of fiscal 2002. As a result of this restructuring, we incurred a charge of $8.0 million. The restructuring charge included $4.8 million of severance-related amounts, $2.7 million of committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and $0.5 million in fixed assets write-offs. The reserve balances of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively, at April 30, 2003 and 2002, were included in other accrued liabilities.

     During fiscal 2002, we purchased our Sunnyvale headquarters site and terminated the operating leases. As a result, an adjustment was made to reduce the previously recorded estimated facilities lease losses by $1.5 million. During fiscal 2003, we recorded a net restructuring adjustment of $0.3 million due to changes in the estimated costs of certain actions and final resolution of certain restructuring activities. In the event that the foreign facilities are not subleased, we will be obligated for additional total lease payments of approximately $0.7 million to be payable through January 2006.

33


The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the restructuring reserve at April 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

                 
Severance-Fixed Assets
Related AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotal




Restructuring charge $4,796  $528  $2,656  $7,980 
Cash payments  (4,508)     (803)  (5,311)
Non-cash portion     (528)  (37)  (565)
Adjustments  (95)     (1,509)  (1,604)
   
   
   
   
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2002 $193  $  $307  $500 
   
   
   
   
 
Cash payments  64      (82)  (18)
Non-cash portion        (9)  (9)
Adjustments  410      (76)  334 
   
   
   
   
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2003 $667  $  $140  $807 
   
   
   
   
 
Fiscal 2002 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Plan

     In April 2002, we announced and substantially completed a restructuring related to the closure of an engineering facility and consolidation of resources to the Sunnyvale headquarters, which included a headcount reduction of 34 employees. As a result of this restructuring, we incurred a charge of $5.9 million. The restructuring charge included $0.8 million of severance-related amounts, $4.6 million of committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and $0.5 million in fixed assets write-off. Of the reserve balance at April 30, 2003, $1.5 million was included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $3.1 million was classified as long-term obligations.

     In January 2003, we updated our assumptions and estimates based on certain triggering events, which resulted in an additional net charge of $0.9 million, primarily relating to our engineering facility lease. Our estimates are reviewed and revised periodically and may result in a substantial charge to restructuring expense should different conditions prevail than were anticipated in original management estimates. Such estimates included various assumptions such as the time period over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease terms, and expected sublease rates. In the event that the engineering facility is not subleased, we will be obligated for additional total lease payments of $3.4 million to be payable through November 2010.

The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the restructuring reserve at April 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

                 
Severance-Fixed Assets
Related AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotal




Restructuring charge $813  $473  $4,564  $5,850 
Cash payments  (629)     (32)  (661)
Non-cash portion     (473)     (473)
Adjustments            
   
   
   
   
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2002  184      4,532   4,716 
   
   
   
   
 
Cash payments  (77)     (991)  (1,068)
Non-cash portion            
Adjustments  (107)     1,030   923 
   
   
   
   
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2003 $  $  $4,571  $4,571 
   
   
   
   
 

     Of the reserve balances at April 30, 2003 and 2002, $1.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively were included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $3.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were classified as long-term obligations.

34


Interest income — During fiscal 2003, interest income was $12.2 million, as compared to $18.5 million in fiscal 2002. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower average interest rates, partially offset by higher investment balances provided by operating activities. We expect interest income to decline further in fiscal 2004, as existing investments mature and proceeds are reinvested in a lower interest-rate environment.

Other income (expense), net — Other income (expense), net, included a net exchange loss from foreign currency transactions of $1.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for fiscal 2003 and 2002.

Net loss on investments — Our investments in publicly held companies are generally considered impaired when a decline in the fair value of an investment as measured by quoted market prices is less than its carrying value, and such a decline is not considered temporary. In fiscal 2003, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $0.7 million related to the impairment of our investment in a publicly traded company. In fiscal 2002, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $13.0 million related to impairments of our investments in publicly traded and private companies. During fiscal 2003, we sold shares of certain privately held investments and realized a net loss of $0.5 million. During fiscal 2002, we sold shares of certain marketable investments and the realized gain was not material.

Gain on sale of intangible assets — We recorded a gain on sale of intangible assets of $0.6 million in fiscal 2003 related to the sale of our ContentReporterTM software. We intend to resell this software through a licensing arrangement.

Provision (benefit), for income taxes — For fiscal 2003, our effective tax rate was 21.8%. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2003 differed from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to credits, and foreign earnings in a lower tax jurisdiction. For fiscal 2002, we applied an annual benefit rate of 19.7% to pretax loss. Our effective tax rate is based on existing tax laws and distributions of income/(loss) among different entities and tax jurisdictions.

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001

     Product Revenuesrevenues — Product revenues decreased by 23.8% to $729.9 million in fiscal 2002, from $957.8 million in fiscal 2001. The decline in product revenues was due to a decrease in product sales to Internet-based companies and reduced capital spending among technology companies across all geographies, but primarily in North America. This decrease in product revenues for fiscal 2002 was specifically attributable to a lower volume of units and software licenses shipped, as compared to fiscal 2001.

     Product revenues were negatively impacted by the following factors:

 • reduced demand for our products resulting from deteriorating macroeconomic conditions;
 
 • continued weakness in technology spending from Internet- and technology-related customers;
 
 • decreased sales through indirect channels, including sales through our OEM partners, representing 26.4%39.1% and 28.2% of total revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively;
 
 • declining average selling price of the F700 filers and older caching products; and
 
 • declining unit sales of our older products.

     Product revenues were favorably impacted by the following factors:

 • increased sales from new industry verticals: energy, telecommunications, financial services, manufacturing, life sciences and the government;
 
 • a higher average selling price of our new products: our high-end F880 and low-end F87 filer products, as well as new NetCache appliances and software features;

25


 • competitive pricing advantage as a result of lower total cost of ownership in four aspects: lower acquisition cost, reduced administrative overhead, minimized service cost and reduced downtime of critical business applications;

35


 • data management and content delivery software offering a unique set of features to ensure mission-critical availability, while reducing the complexity of enterprise storage management;
 
 • higher sales of software subscription upgrades, representing 6.6% and 3.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively;
 
 • increased add-on software revenue from multiprotocol solutions; and
 
 • introduction of NearStore appliancessystems for business continuance and online recovery.

     Service Revenuesrevenues — Service revenues increased by 41.6% to $68.5 million in fiscal 2002, from $48.4 million in fiscal 2001. Service revenue is generally deferred and, in most cases, recognized ratably over the service period obligations, which are typically one to three years. The increase in service revenues (representing 8.6 %8.6% and 4.8% of total revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively) was primarily related to a growing installed base resulting in new customer support contracts in addition to support contract renewals by existing customers.

     International total revenues (including United StatesU.S. exports) decreased by 12.4% for fiscal 2002 as compared to fiscal 2001. International total revenues were $335.2 million, or 42.0% of total revenues for fiscal 2002. The decline in international sales for fiscal 2002 was primarily a result of a slower demand in the Europe and Asia Pacific markets offset by our increased sales and marketing efforts internationally.

     Product Gross Margingross margin — Product gross margin decreased to 64.1%63.3% of product revenues for fiscal 2002 as compared to 64.3%64.0% in fiscal 2001. Amortization of existing technology included in cost of product revenue was $5.7 and $2.6 million, respectively, for fiscal 2002 and 2001.

     Product gross margin was negatively impacted by:

 • the decrease in product sales volume;
 
 • sales price reductions due to competitive pricing pressure and selective pricing discounts;
 
 • lower of cost or market adjustments to inventory;
 
 • decreased licensing of our software due to lower volume of units shipped;
 
 • lower average selling price of certain add-on software options; and
 
 • higher disk content with an expanded storage capacity for the higher-end filers including the F840 and F880 filers.

     Product gross margin was favorably impacted by:

 • lower costs of key components and subsystems;
 
 • favorable product and software mix;
 
 • a faster-than-expected shift to our new high-density storage subsystem due to a favorable average selling price on the enclosures, electronics and power systems sold with the disk systems, and efficient hardware packaging;
 
 • higher average selling prices for our new products;
 
 • manufacturing overhead cost control and reduction efforts, including the restructuring impact;
 
 • December and July partial facility shutdowns; and
 
 • growth in software subscription upgrades due primarily to a larger installed base.

26


     Service Gross Margingross margin — Service gross margin increased to 18.2% for fiscal 2002 as compared to a negative gross margin of 23.8% in fiscal 2001. Investments in customer service decreased by 6.5% to $56.0 million in fiscal 2002, from $59.9 million in fiscal 2001. The improvement in service gross margin in fiscal 2002 was primarily due to operational and cost efficiencies in the global customer service organizations. The negative

36


service gross margin in fiscal 2001 was due to the ramping up and continued investment in our service infrastructure in anticipation of service revenue growth.

     Sales and Marketingmarketing — Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, advertising and promotional expenses, and certain customer service and support costs. Sales and marketing expenses decreased 1.6% to $284.4 million for fiscal 2002, from $289.0 million for fiscal 2001. These expenses were 35.6% and 28.7% of total revenues for fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars was attributed to various cost control and reduction measures, restructuring impact, lower commission expenses and other profit-dependent payroll-related expenses, and disposal of certain capital assets in fiscal 2001, partially offset by the continued worldwide investment in our sales and customer service organizations. Sales and marketing headcount decreased to 1,224 in fiscal 2002, from 1,277 in fiscal 2001 due primarily to the restructuring impact. We expect to continue to selectively add sales capacity in an effort to expand domestic and international markets, introduce new products, establish and expand new distribution channels, and increase product and company awareness. We expect to increase our sales and marketing expenses commensurate with future revenue growth.

     Research and Developmentdevelopment — Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, prototype expenses, non-recurring engineering charges, and fees paid to outside consultants. Research and development expenses decreased 3.5% to $116.7 million in fiscal 2002, from $120.9 million in fiscal 2001. These expenses represented 14.6% and 12.0% of total revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. Research and development expenses decreased in absolute dollars, primarily as a result of cost control, reduction in discretionary spending efforts, restructuring impact, the two holiday facility shutdowns, lower headcount, and lower profit-dependent payroll related expenses, partially offset by the operating impact of the Orca Systems, Inc. (“Orca”) and WebManage Technologies, Inc. (“WebManage”) acquisitions. Research and development headcount decreased to 514 in fiscal 2002, from 566 in fiscal 2001. We expect to continuously support current and future product development and enhancement efforts, and incur prototyping expenses and non-recurring engineering charges associated with the development of new products and technologies.

     We believe that our future performance will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and enhance our current product line, develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of customer requirements. We intend to continuously expand our existing product offerings and introduce new products, and expect that expenditures for these purposes will increase in absolute dollars. For both fiscal 2002 and 2001, no software development costs were capitalized.

     General and Administrativeadministrative — General and administrative expenses decreased 0.1% to $40.2 million in fiscal 2002, from $40.2 million in fiscal 2001. These expenses represented 5.0% and 4.0% of total revenues for fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. Decreases in absolute dollars were primarily due to cost controls, reductions in discretionary spending, the impact of restructuring, the two holiday facility shutdowns, and lower profit-dependent payroll related expenses, partially offset by expenses associated with initiatives to enhance enterprise-wide management information systems, general legal costs, and an increase in the allowance for bad debts. General and administrative headcount decreased to 246 in fiscal 2002, from 253 in fiscal 2001. We believe that our general and administrative expenses will not increase significantly in absolute dollars in fiscal 2003.

     Amortization of Intangible Assets GoodwillAmortizationDue to the adoption of intangible assets represents theSFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized in fiscal 2003 as compared to amortization on acquired intangible assets and amortization on the excessexpense of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired by us. Intangible assets as of April 30, 2002, including goodwill, existing workforce, and technology, were being amortized over estimated useful lives of three to five years. We assess the recoverability of intangible assets by determining whether the amortized asset over its useful life may be recovered through estimated useful cash flows. Amortization of intangible assets charged to operations was $20.9 million and $11.7$15.2 million in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively.$9.1 million in fiscal 2001.

27


     In-process Researchresearch and Development development— We incurred in-process research and development charges of approximately $26.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2001 related to the acquisition of Orca. The purchase price of the transaction was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. Approximately $26.7 million was allocated to in-process research and development and charged to operations, because the acquired technology had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses. The value was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired in-process technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flows from such projects, and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. The discount rate included a factor that took into account the uncertainty surrounding the successful development of the acquired in-process technology. These estimates are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the development process, and no assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur. Research and development costs to bring the products from Orca to technological feasibility are not expected to have a material impact on our future results of operations or financial condition.

     The Orca acquisition has been successfully utilized for the design and development of the DAFS protocol. By eliminating much of the traditional operating system overhead, DAFS allows for improved I/O performance while using fewer CPU cycles. The protocol leverages next generation networking technologies that provide remote memory transfer capabilities, including Remote Direct Memory Access (“RDMA”) implemented in Virtual Interface (“VI”) and Infiniband. The DAFS protocol has good industry support and is now under consideration as an industry standard. We introduced DAFS capable products in April 2002.

     Stock Compensation compensation— We account for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”)APB No. 25, “Accounting“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and comply with the

37


provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for non-employee compensation awards. Accordingly, we recognize the intrinsic value for employees and the fair value for non-employees as stock compensation expense over the vesting terms of the awards. Stock compensation expenses were $7.2 million and $6.2 million in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. This increase was primarily attributable to the recognition of stock compensation on options assumed in the WebManage acquisition and the release of 165,310 contingently issuable milestone shares relating to Orca valued at $3.0 million. We expect an additional stock compensation relating to 99,187 contingently issuable Orca common share, to be measured on the date the performance criteria are met.

     Restructuring Charges charges— In August 2001, we implemented a restructuring plan, which included a reduction in workforce by approximately 200 employees and a consolidation of facilities. The action was required to properly align and manage the business commensurate with our then-current revenue levels. All functional areas of the Company were affected by the reduction. We completed our actions during the second quarter of fiscal 2002. As a result of this restructuring, we incurred a charge of $8.0 million. The restructuring charge included $4.8 million of severance-related amounts, $2.7 million of committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and $0.5 million in fixed assets write-offs.

     During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we purchased our Sunnyvale headquarters site and terminated the operating leases. As a result, an adjustment was made to reduce the previously recorded estimated facilities lease losses by $1.5 million.

     As of April 30, 2002, we had paid substantially all of the severance liability. Of the balance at April 30, 2002, $0.5 million was included in other accrued liabilities.

28


     The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the second quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring at April 30, 2002 (in thousands):

                 
Severance-Fixed Assets
Related AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotal




Restructuring charge $4,796  $528  $2,656  $7,980 
Cash payments  (4,508)     (803)  (5,311)
Non-cash portion     (528)  (37)  (565)
Adjustments  (95)     (1,509)  (1,604)
   
   
   
   
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2002 $193  $  $307  $500 
   
   
   
   
 

     In April 2002, we announced and substantially completed a restructuring related to the closure of an engineering facility and consolidation of resources to the Sunnyvale headquarters, which included a headcount reduction of 34 employees. As a result of this restructuring, we incurred a charge of $5.9 million. The restructuring charge included $0.8 million of severance-related amounts, $4.6 million of committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and $0.5 million in fixed assets write-offs. Of the reserve balance at April 30, 2002, $1.1 million was included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $3.6 million was classified as long-term obligations.

     The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring at April 30, 2002 (in thousands):

                 
Severance-Fixed Assets
Related AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotal




Restructuring charge $813  $473  $4,564  $5,850 
Cash payments  (629)     (32)  (661)
Non-cash portion     (473)     (473)
   
   
   
   
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2002 $184  $  $4,532  $4,716 
   
   
   
   
 

     We expect annual cost savings of approximately $29.8 million as a result of the restructuring and reduction in force actions taken in the second and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002.

Interest Incomeincome and Other, Net other, net— During fiscal 2002, interest income and other, net was $16.6 million, as compared to $23.4 million in fiscal 2001. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower average interest rates, partially offset by higher average investment balances from cash, short-term investments and

38


restricted cash generated from operations. We expect interest income to decline further in fiscal 2003, as existing investments mature and proceeds are reinvested in a lower interest-rate environment. Interest income and other, net also included gains and losses from foreign currency transactions.

     Impairment LossNet loss on Investments investments— We perform periodic reviews of our investments for impairment. Our investments in publicly held companies are generally considered impaired when a decline in the fair value of an investment as measured by quoted market prices is less than its carrying value, and such a decline is not considered temporary. Our investments in privately held companies are considered impaired when a review of the investees’ operations and other indicators of impairment indicate that the carrying value of the investment is not likely to be recoverable. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of receiving additional financing, and limited prospects for liquidity of the related securities. In the second quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $13.0 million related to impairments of our investments in publicly traded and private companies. During fiscal 2002 and 2001, we sold shares of certain marketable equity securities and the realized gains for those periods were not material.

     Provision (Benefit)(benefit), for Income Taxes income taxes— For fiscal 2002, we applied an annual benefit rate of 19.7% to pretax loss. For fiscal 2001, our effective tax rate was 34.5%, which excluded the effect of non-deductible amortization of goodwill and the write-off of acquired in-process research and development. Our estimateeffective tax rate is based on existing tax laws and our current projections of income/(loss) and distributions of income/(loss) among different entities and tax jurisdictions, and is subject to change, based primarily on varying levels of profitability.jurisdictions.

29


Fiscal 2001 Compared to Fiscal 2000

Business Combinations — During the first quarter of fiscal 2001, we acquired Orca for a purchase price of $50.0 million in common stock, assumed options and cash, with an obligation to provide 264,497 shares of common stock, which will result in additional stock compensation charges if certain performance criteria are achieved. We also paid certain transaction costs and assumed certain operating assets and liabilities. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The purchase price of the transaction was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. Amounts allocated to existing workforce and goodwill are being amortized on a straight-line basis over three-and five-year periods, respectively. Approximately $26.7 million was allocated to in-process research and development and charged to operations because the acquired technology had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses.

     During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we acquired WebManage for $59.4 million in common stock, assumed options and cash, with an obligation to provide shares of common stock to be valued at $3.0 million, if certain performance criteria are achieved. The performance criteria were met in March 2001 and the contingent consideration has been recorded as stock compensation in the fourth quarter of 2001. We also paid certain transaction costs and assumed certain operating assets and liabilities. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The purchase price of the transaction was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. Amounts allocated to existing technology and workforce are being amortized on a straight-line basis over three years and amounts allocated to goodwill are being amortized over five years.

Product Revenues — Product revenues increased by 71.9% to $957.8 million in fiscal 2001, from $557.4 million in fiscal 2000. Product revenues growth was across all geographies, products and markets. This increase in product revenues for fiscal 2001 was primarily attributable to a higher volume of units shipped, as compared to fiscal 2000. This growth in volume declined in the second half of fiscal 2001. Factors impacting unit growth include:

• demand for our F700 filers utilizing primarily fibre-channel disks;
• introduction of our new higher capacity F840, mid-range F820 and F85 entry-level filer products;
• increased worldwide demand for our NetCache appliances and content delivery network solutions;
• increased worldwide shipment of NetApp Cluster Failover solutions, which require another filer to take over in the event of a hardware failure;
• increased demand for the SnapMirror software option, which requires multiple filers to provide remote mirroring of data for quick disaster recovery and backup at remote sites;
• expansion of our sales organization to 976 in fiscal 2001 from 582 in fiscal 2000; and
• increased sales through indirect channels, including sales through our OEM partners, representing 28.2% and 26.8% of total total revenues for fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively.

     Product revenues growth was also positively impacted by:

• a higher average selling price of our add-on software options;
• SnapMirror, SnapRestore and SnapManager for Microsoft Exchange, and Cluster Failover, supporting mission-critical applications;
• a higher average selling price of our new high-end F840 filers;
• a higher average selling price due to the introduction of NetCache software features, including ContentReporterTM and ContentDirector;
• the increase in storage capacity;
• increased add-on software revenue from multiprotocol solutions; and

30


• higher software subscription (representing 3.6 % and 2.9% of total revenues for fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively).

     Overall product revenues growth was partially offset by:

• declining demand for our products in the second half of fiscal 2001;
• declining average selling price of the F700 filers and caching products due to competitive pricing; and
• declining unit sales of our older products.

Service Revenues — Service revenues increased by 120.3% to $48.4 million in fiscal 2001, from $21.9 million in fiscal 2000. The increase in service revenues (representing 4.8 % and 3.8% of total revenues for fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively) was primarily related to a growing installed base needing maintenance and technical support.

     International total revenues (including United States exports) grew by 115.0% for fiscal 2001 as compared to fiscal 2000. International total revenues were $382.5 million, or 38.0% of total revenues for fiscal 2001. The increase in international revenues for fiscal 2001, was primarily a result of European and Asia Pacific total revenues growth, due to increased headcount in the direct sales force, increased indirect channel sales, increased shipments of filers, Cluster Failover solutions and NetCache appliances and increased sales of add-on software licenses, as compared to the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year.

Product Gross Margin — Product gross margin increased to 64.3% of product revenues for fiscal 2001, from 62.8% for fiscal 2000.

     Product gross margin was favorably impacted by:

• increased licensing of add-on software options such as Multi-Protocol, Cluster Failover, SnapMirror, SnapRestore, SnapManager and new software introductions including ContentReporter and ContentDirector;
• growth in software subscriptions due primarily to a larger installed base;
• lower costs of key components;
• the increase in product volume;
• increased manufacturing efficiencies; and
• a mix shift to high-end F840 systems sold as diskless upgrades, carrying higher margin than configured systems.

     Gross margin was negatively impacted by:

• sales price reductions on storage products due to competitive pricing pressure;
• higher disk content with an expanded storage capacity for the F840 filer;
• lower sales volume in the second half of fiscal 2001; and
• lower of cost or market adjustments to inventory.

Service Gross Margin — Service gross margin was negative 23.8% for fiscal 2001 as compared to negative gross margin of 29.3% in fiscal 2000. Investments in customer service increased by 111.1% to $59.9 million in fiscal 2001, from $28.4 million in fiscal 2000. The negative service gross margin in both fiscal 2001 and 2000 was due to the ramping up and continued investment in our service infrastructure in anticipation of service revenues growth.

Sales and Marketing — Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, advertising and promotional expenses, and certain customer service and support costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased 87.8% to $289.0 million for fiscal 2001 from $153.9 million for fiscal 2000. These expenses were 28.7% and 26.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively. The increase in absolute dollars

31


was primarily related to the continued worldwide expansion of our sales and customer service organizations, expansion of various marketing and industry initiatives, increased commission expenses in the first three quarters and disposal of certain capital assets in the fourth quarter. Sales and marketing headcount increased to 1,277 in fiscal 2001 from 775 in fiscal 2000.

Research and Development — Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, prototype expenses, non-recurring engineering charges, and fees paid to outside consultants. Research and development expenses increased 96.4% to $120.9 million in fiscal 2001 from $61.6 million in fiscal 2000. These expenses represented 12.0% and 10.6% of total revenues, for fiscal year 2001 and 2000, respectively. Research and development expenses increased in absolute dollars, primarily as a result of increased headcount, operating impact of Orca and WebManage acquisitions, ongoing support of current and future product development and enhancement efforts, prototyping expenses and non-recurring engineering charges associated with the development of new products and technologies, including the NetApp F85, F800 series filers and the new generation of our NetCache appliances coupled with our content distribution and reporting software. Research and development headcount increased to 566 in fiscal 2001 from 327 in fiscal 2000. We believe that our future performance will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and enhance our current product line, develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness and meet an expanding range of customer requirements. For both fiscal 2001 and 2000, no software development costs were capitalized.

General and Administrative — General and administrative expenses increased 90.7% to $40.2 million in fiscal 2001, from $21.1 million in fiscal 2000. These expenses represented 4.0% and 3.6% of total revenues, for fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively. Increases in absolute dollars were primarily due to increased headcount, expenses associated with initiatives to enhance enterprise-wide management information systems and increased professional service fees. General and administrative headcount increased to 253 in fiscal 2001 from 162 in fiscal 2000.

Amortization of Intangible Assets — Amortization of intangible assets represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired by us. Intangible assets as of April 30, 2001, including goodwill, existing workforce and technology, are being amortized over the estimated useful life of three to five-year periods. We assess the recoverability of intangible assets by determining whether the amortized asset over its useful life may be recovered through estimated useful cash flows. Amortization of intangible assets charged to operations was $11.7 million and $0.2 million in fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively.

In-process Research and Development — We incurred in-process research and development charges of approximately $26.7 million in fiscal 2001 related to the acquisition of Orca. The purchase price of the transaction was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. Approximately $26.7 million was allocated to in-process research and development and charged to operations, because the acquired technology had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses. The value was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired in-process technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flows from such projects, and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. The discount rate included a factor that took into account the uncertainty surrounding the successful development of the acquired in-process technology. These estimates are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the development process, and no assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur. Research and development costs to bring the products from Orca to technological feasibility are not expected to have a material impact on our future results of operations or financial condition.

     We believe we can utilize the Orca acquisition to develop the first virtual interface-based (VI) next generation of network storage systems. We are leveraging VI architecture to develop the DAFS protocol. DAFS enables data transfers straight from the file server, allowing clusters of application servers in heterogeneous environments to share data from the memory of one system to the memory of another without involving general-purpose operating systems, thereby improving CPU utilization and speeding up data access. We expect to continue the development of products using this protocol and believe that there is a reasonable

32


chance of successfully delivering initial products in calendar year 2001. However, there is risk associated with the completion of the in-process project and there can be no assurance that such project will meet with either technological or commercial success. Failure to successfully develop and commercialize this in-process project would result in the loss of the expected economic return inherent in the fair value allocation. Additionally, the value of other intangible assets acquired may become impaired. The risks associated with the research and development are still considered high and no assurance can be made that upcoming products will meet market expectations or gain market acceptance.

Stock Compensation — We account for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with provisions of APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” for employee compensation awards and comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for non-employee compensation awards. Accordingly, we recognize the intrinsic value for employees and the fair value for non-employees as stock compensation expense over the vesting terms of the awards. Stock compensation expenses were $6.2 million and $1.3 million in fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively. This increase was primarily attributable to the recognition of stock compensation of unvested options assumed in the WebManage acquisition, issuance of contingently issuable milestone shares, increased participation in the salaried stock option grant program by certain highly compensated employees and non-employee stock options awards.

Total Other Income, net — Total other income, net, was $23.4 million and $9.0 million in fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively. The increase in interest income was primarily due to increased cash and short-term investments generated from operations and net proceeds from stock option exercises.

Provision for Income Taxes — Our effective tax was 34.5%, excluding the effect of non-deductible amortization of goodwill and acquired in-process research and development of $35.5 million for fiscal 2001. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2000 was 35.5%. The effective tax rates differed from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to state taxes, credits, tax exempt interest, goodwill amortization and acquired in-process research and development.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     As of April 30, 2003, as compared to the April 30, 2002 balances, our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments increased by $164.7 million to $618.8 million. We derive our liquidity and capital resources primarily from our cash flow from operations and from working capital. Working capital which increased by $46.8$124.9 million to $463.6 million. As$588.5 million as of April 30, 2002, as2003, compared to the$463.6 million as of April 30, 2001 balances, our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments increased by $90.1 million to $454.1 million.2002. We generated cash from operating activities totaling $143.9$195.3 million and $218.4$143.9 million in fiscal 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 20022003 was principally related to net income of $3.0$76.5 million, decreases in accounts receivable, and increases in other accrued liabilities, accrued compensation and related benefits, income taxes payable, deferred revenue, coupled with depreciation, impairmentnet loss on investments, amortization of intangiblesintangible assets and stock compensation, partially offset by decreases indecreased accounts payable, accrued compensation and related benefits and increases in inventories.

     In addition to lower netaccounts receivable, inventories, deferred income in fiscal 2002, the primary factors that impacted the period-to-period change in cash flows relating to operating activities included the following:

• lower accounts receivable balances due to lower sales and more collections in fiscal 2002;
• noncash acquisition-related charges, stock compensation, impairment loss on investments, provision for doubtful accounts, and depreciation included in net income;
• increased accrued liabilities relating to the restructuring; and
• increase in deferred revenue related to service and software subscription upgrades.

33


     The above factors were partially offset by the effects of:

• decreased balances for accounts payable due to lower levels of business activity in fiscal 2002;
• decreased accrued compensation and related benefits due to payouts of profit dependent personnel expenses accrued in fiscal 2001 and paid in fiscal 2002, vacation taken during the July and December 2001 holidays’ facility shutdowns, and lower commission accrual as a result of lower levels of sales;
• increased inventory levels due to preparation for ramping our new NearStore product; and
• decreased income taxes payable, primarily reflecting lower profitability in fiscal 2002.
taxes and prepaid expenses and other assets.

     We used $284.2$61.3 million and $83.7$284.2 million of cash in fiscal 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively, for capital expenditures. The fiscal 2002 increase in property and equipment includesexpenditure included the purchase of the land and buildings at our Sunnyvale headquarters site for $249.8 million. Since we have curtailedExcluding the Sunnyvale headquarters land and buildings acquisition, the increase in capital expenditures, purchases of fixed assets were only $34.4 million in fiscal 2002, compared to $83.7 million the same period a year ago. The decreaseover year was primarily attributed to the slowdown in hiringupgrades of our ERP infrastructure, computer-related purchases, and various cost control and cutting measures.building improvements. We have used $149.9net proceeds of $90.0 million and $14.3$149.9 million in fiscal 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively, for net purchases of short-term investments. In the first quarter of fiscal 2001, we acquired Orca for a purchase price of approximately $50.0 million, including common stock, contingently issuable common stock, assumed options, cash payments of $2.0 million and related transaction costs. In the third quarter of 2001, we acquired WebManage for a purchase price of approximately $59.4 million, including common stock, assumed options, cash payments of $5.0 million and related transaction costs. Investing activities in fiscal 20022003 and 20012002 also included new equity investments in privately-held companies of $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively. During fiscal 2003, we sold certain privately held investments and $7.0 million, respectively.received proceeds of $0.8 million.

     We received $29.2 million and $230.2 million in fiscal 2003 and 2002, and used $113.2 million in fiscal 2001respectively, from financing activities. The increasechange in cash flow from financing in fiscal 2002 was primarily fromincluded the effects of a decrease in restricted cash (see “ Commitmentsrequirements of $193.7 million. This requirement was eliminated in April 2002 in conjunction with the purchase of our Sunnyvale headquarters and Contingencies” Note 4 to Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) partially offset by decreased proceedstermination of our operating leases, and thus had no effect on cash flows from the sale of common stock.financing activities in fiscal 2003. The decrease in cash provided by salesflow from financing activities was also a result of common stock for fiscal 2002, compared to the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year, was primarily due to lower proceeds from stock option exercise proceedsexercises as a result of the decline in our stock price.

     Our capital and liquidity requirements depend on numerous factors, including risks relating to fluctuating operating results, continued growth in the network storage and content delivery markets, customer and market acceptance of our products, dependence on new products, rapid technological change, dependence on qualified technical and sales personnel, risk inherent in our international operations, competition, reliance on a limited number of suppliers and contract manufacturers, relationships with strategic partners, dependence on

39


proprietary technology, intellectual property rights, the value of our investments in equity securities and real estate, and other factors. We believe that our existing liquidity and capital resources are sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.

Contractual Obligations

     The following summarizes our contractual obligations at April 30, 2002,2003, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods, (in thousands):

                                                 
20032004200520062007ThereafterTotal20042005200620072008ThereafterTotal














Operating lease payments $9,194 $7,786 $7,624 $4,559 $2,817 $122,444 $154,424  $10,096 $8,702 $6,190 $3,739 $2,918 $9,662 $41,307 
Venture capital funding commitments 1,144 1,144 1,144 1,143   4,575  1,308 1,308 1,309    3,925 
Purchase commitments 3,966      3,966  28,891 8,400 10,000 10,000   57,291 
Maintenance services and other 4,716 4,694 2,214    11,624 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 $14,304 $8,930 $8,768 $5,702 $2,817 $122,444 $162,965  $45,011 $23,104 $19,713 $13,739 $2,918 $9,662 $114,147 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

34


Item 7a.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk

     We are exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in interest rates, market prices and foreign currency exchange rates. We use certain derivative financial instruments to manage these risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. All financial instruments are used in accordance with board-approvedmanagement-approved policies.

Market Interest and Interest Income Risk

     Interest and Investment Income — As of April 30, 2002,2003, we had short-term investments of $243.4$334.7 million. Our investment portfolio primarily consists of highly liquid investments with original maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months, which are classified as available-for-sale, and investment in marketable equity securities in certainprimarily technology companies. These highly liquid investments, consisting primarily of government and corporate debt securities, are subject to interest rate and interest income risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. A hypothetical 10 percent10% increase in market interest rates from levels at April 30, 2002,2003, would cause the fair value of these short-term investments to decline by approximately $0.5$0.7 million. Because we have the ability to hold these investments until maturity we would not expect any significant decline in value of our investments caused by market interest rate changes. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.

Market Price Risk

     Equity Securities — — We are also exposed to market price risk on our equity securitysecurities included in our short-term investments. Such investment isinvestments, which are primarily in a publicly traded companycompanies in the volatile high-technology industry sector. In fiscal 2003, we recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary write-down of $0.7 million related to the impairment of our investment in a publicly traded company. In fiscal 2002, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $13.0 million related to impairments in publicly traded and private companies.

     We do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on this securitythese securities and, as a result, the amount of income and cash flow that we ultimately realize from thisour investment in future periods may vary materially from the current unrealized amount.fair value. A 50% adverse change in the equity price would result in an approximate $0.3$0.1 million decrease in the fair value of our equity security as of April 30, 2002.2003.

     The hypothetical changes and assumptions discussed above will be different from what actually occurs in the future. Furthermore, such computations do not anticipate actions that may be taken by management,

40


should the hypothetical market changes actually occur over time. As a result, the effect on actual earnings in the future will differ from those described above.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk and Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts

     We hedge risks associated with foreign currency transactions in order to minimize the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on earnings. We utilize forward contracts to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. All hedge instrumentsbalance sheet hedges are marked to market through earnings every period. We believe that thesealso use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain sales and operating expenses. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. For cash flow hedges, the gains or losses were included in other comprehensive income and were not material at April 30, 2003.

     We do not subject us to undue risk due toenter into foreign exchange movements because gains and losses on these contracts are offsetfor speculative or trading purposes. In entering into forward foreign exchange contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. We attempt to limit our exposure to credit risk by losses and gains on the underlying assets and liabilities.

executing foreign contracts with credit worthy multinational commercial banks. All contracts have a maturity of less than one year and we do not defer any gains and losses, as they are all accounted for through earnings every period.year.

The following table provides information about our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding on April 30, 2003 (in thousands):

                   
Foreign CurrencyContract ValueFair Value
CurrencyBuy/SellAmountUSDin USD





 AUD   Sell   10,332  $6,326  $6,325 
 CHF   Sell   2,676  $1,962  $1,962 
 GBP   Sell   17,822  $28,282  $28,258 
 EUR   Sell   63,494  $70,031  $70,091 
 CAD   Sell   3,409  $2,347  $2,347 
 EUR   Buy   5,890  $6,485  $6,501 
 GBP   Buy   1,282  $2,035  $2,032 

     The following table provides information about our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding on April 30, 2002 (in thousands):

                 
ForeignContract
CurrencyValueFair Value
CurrencyBuy/SellAmountUSDin USD





AUD  Sell   8,296  $4,472  $4,484 
CHF  Sell   3,155  $1,945  $1,945 
GBP  Sell   13,270  $19,309  $19,347 
EUR  Sell   72,311  $64,733  $64,827 
                   
Foreign CurrencyContract ValueFair Value
CurrencyBuy/SellAmountUSDin USD





 AUD   Sell   8,296  $4,472  $4,484 
 CHF   Sell   3,155  $1,945  $1,945 
 GBP   Sell   13,270  $19,309  $19,347 
 EUR   Sell   72,311  $64,733  $64,827 

35


The following table provides information about our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding on April 30, 2001, (in thousands):

                 
ForeignContract
CurrencyValueFair Value
CurrencyBuy/SellAmountUSDin USD





AUD  Sell   17,312  $8,693  $8,733 
CHF  Sell   5,300  $3,082  $3,048 
GBP  Sell   18,085  $25,845  $25,878 
EUR  Sell   50,728  $44,324  $44,726 

3641


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Stockholders of

Network Appliance, Inc.:

     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Network Appliance, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of April 30, 20022003 and 2001,2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 2002.2003. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2). These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Network Appliance, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of April 30, 20022003 and 2001,2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 20022003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2), when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 13, effective May 1, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California

May 10, 20029, 2003
(May 13, 2003 as to Note 15)

3742


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                    
April 30,April 30,


2002200120032002




ASSETS
ASSETS
 ASSETS
Current Assets:
Current Assets:
 
Current Assets:
 
Cash and cash equivalents $210,756 $271,931 Cash and cash equivalents $284,161 $210,756 
Short-term investments 243,371 92,094 Short-term investments 334,677 243,371 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $8,416 in 2002 and $4,030 in 2001 146,511 186,956 Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,355 in 2003 and $8,416 in 2002 151,637 146,511 
Inventories 23,849 22,504 Inventories 31,559 23,849 
Prepaid expenses and other 22,112 25,745 Prepaid expenses and other 24,014 22,112 
Deferred income taxes 32,529 36,287 Deferred income taxes 27,444 32,529 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current assets 679,128 635,517  Total current assets 853,492 679,128 
Restricted Cash
  193,747 
Property and Equipment, net
Property and Equipment, net
 345,195 103,238 
Property and Equipment, net
 362,862 345,195 
Intangible Assets
 58,615 79,510 
Goodwill
Goodwill
 48,212 49,422 
Intangible Assets, net
Intangible Assets, net
 2,954 8,828 
Other Assets
Other Assets
 25,868 24,240 
Other Assets
 51,653 26,233 
 
 
   
 
 
 $1,108,806 $1,036,252   $1,319,173 $1,108,806 
 
 
   
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current Liabilities:
 
Current Liabilities:
 
Accounts payable $40,243 $53,493 Accounts payable $39,600 $40,243 
Income taxes payable 17,073 21,844 Income taxes payable 30,256 17,073 
Accrued compensation and related benefits 36,912 50,523 Accrued compensation and related benefits 40,647 39,434 
Other accrued liabilities 45,193 34,597 Other accrued liabilities 43,841 42,671 
Deferred revenue 76,139 58,316 Deferred revenue 110,672 76,139 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current liabilities 215,560 218,773  Total current liabilities 265,016 215,560 
Long-Term Deferred Revenue
Long-Term Deferred Revenue
 31,036 12,882 
Long-Term Deferred Revenue
 63,698 31,036 
Long-Term Obligations
Long-Term Obligations
 3,734 149 
Long-Term Obligations
 3,102 3,734 
 
 
   
 
 
 250,330 231,804   331,816 250,330 
 
 
   
 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)
 
Stockholders’ Equity:
Stockholders’ Equity:
 
Stockholders’ Equity:
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; shares outstanding: none in 2002 and 2001   Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; shares outstanding: none in 2003 and 2002   
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 880,000 shares authorized: shares outstanding: 335,135 in 2002 and 328,746 in 2001 335 329 Common stock, $0.001 par value; 880,000 shares authorized: shares outstanding: 340,668 in 2003 and 335,135 in 2002 341 335 
Additional paid-in capital 656,619 616,266 Additional paid-in capital 704,338 656,619 
Deferred stock compensation (3,777) (12,044)Deferred stock compensation (1,363) (3,777)
Retained earnings 207,665 204,632 Retained earnings 284,137 207,665 
Cumulative other comprehensive loss (2,366) (4,735)Accumulated other comprehensive loss (96) (2,366)
 
 
   
 
 
 Total stockholders’ equity 858,476 804,448  Total stockholders’ equity 987,357 858,476 
 
 
   
 
 
 $1,108,806 $1,036,252   $1,319,173 $1,108,806 
 
 
   
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3843


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                          
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Revenues
Revenues
 
Revenues
 
Product revenue $729,916 $957,830 $557,352 Product revenue $802,281 $729,916 $957,830 
Service revenue 68,453 48,356 21,948 Service revenue 89,787 68,453 48,356 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total revenues 798,369 1,006,186 579,300  Total revenues 892,068 798,369 1,006,186 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Cost of Revenues
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of product revenue 261,857 341,821 207,477 Cost of product revenue 279,689 267,583 344,446 
Cost of service revenue 55,989 59,886 28,369 Cost of service revenue 65,953 55,989 59,886 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total cost of revenues 317,846 401,707 235,846  Total cost of revenues 345,642 323,572 404,332 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Gross margin 480,523 604,479 343,454 Gross margin 546,426 474,797 601,854 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Operating Expenses:
Operating Expenses:
 
Operating Expenses:
 
Sales and marketing 284,355 289,003 153,877 Sales and marketing 304,236 284,355 289,003 
Research and development 116,725 120,938 61,566 Research and development 112,863 116,725 120,938 
General and administrative 40,182 40,238 21,098 General and administrative 36,822 40,182 40,238 
Amortization of intangible assets 20,895 11,732 200 Amortization of goodwill  15,169 9,107 
In-process research and development  26,688  In-process research and development   26,688 
Stock compensation(1) 7,202 6,223 1,345 Stock compensation(1) 3,642 7,202 6,223 
Restructuring charges 12,226   Restructuring charges 1,257 12,226  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total operating expenses 481,585 494,822 238,086  Total operating expenses 458,820 475,859 492,197 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income (Loss) from Operations
Income (Loss) from Operations
 (1,062) 109,657 105,368 
Income (Loss) from Operations
 87,606 (1,062) 109,657 
Other Income (Expense), net:
Other Income (Expense), net:
 
Other Income (Expense), net:
 
Interest income and other, net 16,603 23,352 9,038 Interest income 12,215 18,507 22,205 
Impairment loss on investments (13,008)   Other income (expense), net (1,381) (1,904) 1,147 
 
 
 
 Net loss on investments (1,229) (13,008)  
 Total other income, net 3,595 23,352 9,038 Gain on sale of intangible asset 604   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total other income, net 10,209 3,595 23,352 
 
 
 
 
Income Before Income Taxes
Income Before Income Taxes
 2,533 133,009 114,406 
Income Before Income Taxes
 97,815 2,533 133,009 
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
 (500) 58,123 40,614 
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
 21,343 (500) 58,123 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net Income
Net Income
 $3,033 $74,886 $73,792 
Net Income
 $76,472 $3,033 $74,886 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net Income per Share:
Net Income per Share:
 
Net Income per Share:
 
Basic $0.01 $0.23 $0.25 Basic $0.23 $0.01 $0.23 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Diluted $0.01 $0.21 $0.21 Diluted $0.22 $0.01 $0.21 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Shares Used in per Share Calculations:
Shares Used in per Share Calculations:
 
Shares Used in per Share Calculations:
 
Basic 331,645 320,435 299,370 Basic 337,647 331,645 320,435 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Diluted 350,498 359,824 345,171 Diluted 350,122 350,498 359,824 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

 
(1) Stock compensation includes: 
 Sales and marketing $1,023 $1,054 $619 
 Research and development 5,694 2,738 499 
 General and administrative 485 2,431 227 
 
 
 
 
 $7,202 $6,223 $1,345 
 
 
 
 


              
(1) Stock compensation includes:            
  Sales and marketing  $1,572   $1,023   $1,054 
  Research and development  1,764   5,694   2,738 
  General and administrative  306   485   2,431 
   
   
   
 
   $3,642   $7,202   $6,223 
   
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3944


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)
                                               
Cumulative
Common StockDeferredOtherCommon Stock

StockRetainedComprehensive
Accumulated
SharesAmountCompensationEarningsLossTotalAdditionalDeferredOther






Paid-inStockRetainedComprehensive
Balances, April 30, 1999
 291,324 $240,807 $(714) $55,954 $(323) $295,724 
Components of comprehensive income: 
Net income    73,792  73,792 SharesAmountCapitalCompensationEarningsLossTotal
Currency translation adjustment (2,204) (2,204)
Unrealized gain on investments     8 8 
 
 
 Total comprehensive income 71,596 
Issuance of common stock 20,479 53,833    53,833 
Deferred stock compensation  1,845 (1,845)    
Amortization of deferred stock compensation   1,345   1,345 
Reversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminations  (40) 40    
Income tax benefit from employee stock transactions  56,248    56,248 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






Balances, April 30, 2000
Balances, April 30, 2000
 311,803 $352,693 $(1,174) $129,746 $(2,519) $478,746 
Balances, April 30, 2000
 311,803 $312 $352,381 $(1,174) $129,746 $(2,519) $478,746 
Components of comprehensive income:Components of comprehensive income: Components of comprehensive income: 
Net income    74,886  74,886 Net income     74,886  74,886 
Currency translation adjustment     (790) (790)Currency translation adjustment      (790) (790)
Unrealized loss on investments     (1,426) (1,426)Unrealized loss on investments      (1,426) (1,426)
 
   
 
 Total comprehensive income 72,670  Total comprehensive income 72,670 
Issuance of common stockIssuance of common stock 15,924 80,510    80,510 Issuance of common stock 15,924 16 80,494    80,510 
Common shares issued and options assumed pursuant to business acquisitionsCommon shares issued and options assumed pursuant to business acquisitions 918 101,237    101,237 Common shares issued and options assumed pursuant to business acquisitions 918 1 101,236    101,237 
Issuance of milestone sharesIssuance of milestone shares 101 3,000    3,000 Issuance of milestone shares 101  3,000    3,000 
Deferred stock compensationDeferred stock compensation  14,127 (14,127)    Deferred stock compensation   14,127 (14,127)    
Amortization of deferred stock compensationAmortization of deferred stock compensation   3,223   3,223 Amortization of deferred stock compensation    3,223   3,223 
Reversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminationsReversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminations  (34) 34    Reversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminations   (34) 34    
Income tax benefit from employee stock transactionsIncome tax benefit from employee stock transactions  65,062    65,062 Income tax benefit from employee stock transactions   65,062    65,062 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances, April 30, 2001
Balances, April 30, 2001
 328,746 $616,595 $(12,044) $204,632 $(4,735) $804,448 
Balances, April 30, 2001
 328,746 $329 $616,266 $(12,044) $204,632 $(4,735) $804,448 
Components of comprehensive income:Components of comprehensive income: Components of comprehensive income: 
Net income    3,033  3,033 Net income     3,033  3,033 
Currency translation adjustment     1,115 1,115 Currency translation adjustment      1,115 1,115 
Unrealized gain on investments     1,254 1,254 Unrealized gain on investments      1,254 1,254 
 
   
 
 Total comprehensive income 5,402  Total comprehensive income 5,402 
Issuance of common stockIssuance of common stock 6,389 36,472    36,472 Issuance of common stock 6,389 6 36,466    36,472 
Issuance of milestone sharesIssuance of milestone shares  3,015    3,015 Issuance of milestone shares   3,015    3,015 
Deferred stock compensationDeferred stock compensation  1,301 (1,301)    Deferred stock compensation   1,301 (1,301)    
Amortization of deferred stock compensationAmortization of deferred stock compensation   4,187   4,187 Amortization of deferred stock compensation    4,187   4,187 
Reversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminationsReversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminations  (5,381) 5,381    Reversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminations   (5,381) 5,381    
Income tax benefit from employee stock transactionsIncome tax benefit from employee stock transactions  4,952    4,952 Income tax benefit from employee stock transactions   4,952    4,952 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances, April 30, 2002
Balances, April 30, 2002
 335,135 $656,954 $(3,777) $207,665 $(2,366) $858,476 
Balances, April 30, 2002
 335,135 $335 $656,619 $(3,777) $207,665 $(2,366) $858,476 
Components of comprehensive income:Components of comprehensive income: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income     76,472  76,472 
Currency translation adjustment      964 964 
Unrealized loss on derivatives     (29) (29)
Unrealized gain on investments      1,335 1,335 
 
 
 Total comprehensive income 78,742 
Issuance of common stockIssuance of common stock 5,544 6 29,243    29,249 
Issuance of milestone sharesIssuance of milestone shares   921    921 
Deferred stock compensationDeferred stock compensation   1,171 (1,171)    
Amortization of deferred stock compensationAmortization of deferred stock compensation    1,973   1,973 
Reversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminationsReversal of deferred stock compensation due to employee terminations   (1,612) 1,612    
Stock compensation expense — nonemployeeStock compensation expense — nonemployee   748    748 
Release of escrow sharesRelease of escrow shares (11)  (1,210)    (1,210)
Income tax benefit from employee stock transactionsIncome tax benefit from employee stock transactions   18,458    18,458 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances, April 30, 2003
Balances, April 30, 2003
 340,668 $341 $704,338 $(1,363) $284,137 $(96) $987,357 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4045


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFLOW

(In thousands)
                            
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
Net income $76,472 $3,033 $74,886 
Net income $3,033 $74,886 $73,792 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  Depreciation and amortization 51,933 44,395 30,528 
 Depreciation and amortization 44,395 30,528 14,163  In-process research and development   26,688 
 In-process research and development  26,688   Amortization of intangible assets 5,478 20,895 11,732 
 Amortization of intangibles 20,895 11,732 200  Stock compensation expense 3,642 7,202 6,223 
 Stock compensation expense 7,202 6,223 1,345  Net loss on investments 1,229 13,008  
 Impairment loss on investments 13,008    Gain on sale of intangible assets (604)   
 Loss on disposal of equipment 3,029 9,356 1,904  Loss on disposal of equipment 1,009 3,029 9,356 
 Provision for doubtful accounts 7,549 2,443 1,275  Provision (reversal) for doubtful accounts (1,696) 7,549 2,443 
 Deferred income taxes (4,592) (35,467) (11,614) Deferred income taxes (18,344) (4,592) (35,467)
 Deferred rent (71) 95 (39) Deferred rent (62) (71) 95 
 Changes in assets and liabilities:  Changes in assets and liabilities: 
 Accounts receivable 33,045 (80,483) (53,352) Accounts receivable (3,264) 33,045 (80,483)
 Inventories (6,156) (13,683) (12,425) Inventories (16,253) (6,156) (13,683)
 Prepaid expenses and other assets (993) 47 (16,320) Prepaid expenses and other assets (4,296) (993) 47 
 Accounts payable (13,250) 30,771 18,935  Accounts payable (643) (13,250) 21,731 
 Income taxes payable 181 93,166 55,647  Income taxes payable 31,642 181 93,166 
 Accrued compensation and related benefits (13,611) 15,472 19,713  Accrued compensation and related benefits 1,213 (11,090) 14,911 
 Other accrued liabilities 14,252 (1,279) 13,148  Other accrued liabilities 599 11,731 8,322 
 Deferred revenue 35,977 47,858 11,708  Deferred revenue 67,195 35,977 47,858 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by operating activities 143,893 218,353 118,080  Net cash provided by operating activities 195,250 143,893 218,353 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
 
Purchases of short-term investments (361,791) (165,897) (99,514)Purchases of short-term investments (361,085) (361,791) (165,897)
Redemptions of short-term investments 211,862 151,595 30,650 Redemptions of short-term investments 271,113 211,862 151,595 
Purchases of property and equipment (284,238) (83,685) (40,819)Purchases of property and equipment (61,269) (284,238) (83,685)
Purchases of equity securities (1,120) (7,041) (7,000)Purchases of equity securities (650) (1,120) (7,041)
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired  (7,171)  Proceeds from sales of investments 797   
Payment of deposits, net   2,500 Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired   (7,171)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash used in investing activities (435,287) (112,199) (114,183) Net cash used in investing activities (151,094) (435,287) (112,199)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
 
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net 36,472 80,510 53,833 Proceeds from sale of common stock, net 29,249 36,472 80,510 
Decrease/(Increase) in restricted cash 193,747 (193,747)  Decrease (increase) in restricted cash  193,747 (193,747)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 230,219 (113,237) 53,833  Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 29,249 230,219 (113,237)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 (61,175) (7,083) 57,730 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 73,405 (61,175) (7,083)
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
 
Beginning of year 271,931 279,014 221,284 Beginning of year 210,756 271,931 279,014 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
End of year $210,756 $271,931 $279,014 End of year $284,161 $210,756 $271,931 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4146


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

1.1.     The Company

     Based in Sunnyvale, California, Network Appliance was incorporated in California in April 1992, and reincorporated in Delaware in November 2001. Network Appliance Inc. is a worldwideworld leader in enterprise networkunified storage and data management solutions.solutions for the data-intensive enterprise. NetApp network storage solutions and service offerings provide data-intensive enterprises with consolidated storage, improved data center operations, economical business continuance, and efficient remote data access across the distributed enterprise. Network Appliance’s success to date has been in delivering highly cost-effective network storage solutions that reduce the complexity associated with conventional storage solutions. Network Appliance solutions are the data management and storage foundation for leading enterprises, government agencies, and universities worldwide.

Since its inception in 1992, Network Appliance has pioneered technology, product, and partner firsts that continue to drive the evolution of storage.

2.2.     Significant Accounting Policies

     Fiscal Year — We operate on a 52-week or 53-week year ending on the last Friday in April. For presentation purposes we have indicated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements that our fiscal year end is April 30. Fiscal 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 were 52-week fiscal years.

��    Basis of Presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the companyCompany and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation. These reclassifications did not change previously reported total assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity or net income.

     Cash and Cash Equivalents — We consider all highly liquid debt investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

     Short-Term Investments — Our short-termAvailable-for-sale investments consist primarily of securities with original maturities ranging betweenof greater than three and twelve months.months are classified as short-term investments, as these investments generally consist of highly marketable securities that are intended to be available to meet current cash requirements. All of our investments are classified as available-for-sale, which are carried at fair market value, and unrealized gains or losses recorded in cumulativeaccumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of taxes. Any gains or losses on sales of investments are computed based upon specific identification. For all periods presented, realized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments were not material. Management determines the appropriate classification of debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates the classification at each reporting date. Available-for-sale investments are reviewed for evidence of reductions in market value that are other than temporary. We perform periodic reviews of our investments for impairment. Our investments in publicly held companies are generally considered impaired when a decline in the fair value of an investment as measured by quoted market prices is less than its carrying value and such a decline is not considered temporary. During fiscal 2003 and 2002, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $726 and $3,641, respectively, related to an impairment of our investmentinvestments in a publicly traded company.companies. These write-downs are included in net loss on investments on the income statement. No write-downs were recorded during fiscal 2001 and 2000.2001.

     Approximately $193,747 of our investment portfolio at April 30, 2001 was invested in a certificate of deposit and was restricted to collateralize our operating leases and classified as noncurrent restricted cash. During fiscal 2002, we discontinued our operating leases by purchasing the land and buildings at our Sunnyvale headquarters site, converting restricted investments to property and equipment on the balance sheet.

     Investments in Nonpublic Companies — We have certain investments in nonpublicly traded companies in which we have less than 20% of the voting rights and in which we do not exercise significant influence. As of April 30, 2003 and 2002, $909 and 2001, $1,724 and $10,084 of these investments are included in other long-term assets on the balance sheet and are carried at cost. We perform periodic reviews of our investments for impairment. Our investments in privately held companies are considered impaired when a review of the investees’ operations and other indicators of impairment indicate that the carrying value of the investment is not likely to be recoverable. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of

4247


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

recoverable. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of receiving additional financing, and limited prospects for liquidity of the related securities. During fiscal 2002, we recorded a noncash, other-than-temporary write-down of $9,367 related to impairments of our investments in private companies. No write-downs were recorded during fiscal 20012003 and 2000.2001. During fiscal 2003, we sold shares of certain privately held investments and realized a net loss of $503.

     Inventories — Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market.

     Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from three to five years. The land at the Sunnyvale headquarters site acquired in April 2002 is not being depreciated. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining term of the lease. Building improvements are amortized over the estimated lives of the assets, which generally range from ten to forty years. Construction in progress will be amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets when they are ready for their intended use.

     We review the carrying values of long-lived assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the net book value of an asset may not be recovered through expected future cash flows from its use and eventual disposition. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured as the difference between the net book value and the estimated fair value of the asset.

     Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets — Goodwill and purchased intangible assets include goodwill and other intangible assets such as existing workforce and existing technology, which are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. For business combinations consummated before July 1, 2001, goodwill and existing workforce were amortized through April 30, 2002 using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of three to five years. Amortization of other purchased intangibles is computed using the straight-line method over the expected useful life of three to five years. We evaluate the impairment of goodwill and purchased intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. See Note 213 —Recently Issued Accounting StandardsGoodwill and Purchased Intangible Assetsof Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements..

     Revenue Recognition and Allowance — We apply the provisions of SOP 97-2, “Software“Software Revenue Recognition” (as amended by SOP 98-4 and SOP 98-9) Recognition,”and related interpretations to all revenue transactions. We recognize revenue when:

Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement Exists.It is our customary practice to have a purchase order prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.

Delivery Has Occurred.Our product is physically delivered to our customers, generally with standard transfer terms as FOB shipping point. Products shipped with acceptance criteria or return rights are not recognized as revenue until all criteria are achieved. If undelivered products or services exist that are essential to the functionality of the delivered product in an arrangement, delivery is not considered to have occurred.

The Fee is Fixed or Determinable.Arrangements with payment terms extending beyond our standard terms and condition practices are not considered to be fixed or determinable. Revenue from such arrangements is recognized as the fees become due and payable.

• Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement Exists.It is our customary practice to have a purchase order prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.
• Delivery has Occurred.Our product is physically delivered to our customers, generally with standard transfer terms as FOB shipping point. Products shipped with acceptance criteria or return rights are not recognized as revenue until all criteria are achieved. If undelivered products or services exist that are essential to the functionality of the delivered product in an arrangement, delivery is not considered to have occurred.
• The Fee is Fixed or Determinable.Arrangements with payment terms extending beyond our standard terms and condition practices are not considered to be fixed or determinable. Revenue from such arrangements is recognized as the fees become due and payable.
• Collection is Probable.Probability of collection is assessed on a customer-by-customer basis. Customers are subjected to a credit review process that evaluates the customers’ financial position and ultimately their ability to pay. If it is determined from the outset of an arrangement that collection is not probable based upon our review process, revenue is recognized upon cash receipt.

     For arrangements with multiple elements, we allocate revenue to each element using the residual method based on vendor specific objective evidence of the undelivered items. We defer the portion of the arrangement

43


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

fee equal to the fair value of the undelivered elements until they are delivered. Vendor specific objective evidence is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately.

48


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     A typical arrangement includes product, software subscription, and maintenance. Some arrangements include training and consulting. Software subscriptions include unspecified productsproduct upgrades and enhancements on a when-and-if-available basis, bug fixes, and patch releases, and are included in product revenues. Service maintenance includes contracts for technical support and hardware maintenance. Revenue from software subscriptions and maintenanceservice is recognized ratably over the contractual term, generally one to three years. Revenue from training and consulting is recognized as the services are performed.

     The following table presents the components of revenues, stated as a percentage of total revenues:

                    
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Revenues:Revenues: Revenues: 
Products 84.8% 91.6% 93.3%Products 81.5% 84.8% 91.6%
Software subscriptions 6.6% 3.6% 2.9%Software subscriptions 8.4% 6.6% 3.6%
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 System products and software subscriptions 91.4% 95.2% 96.2% Product revenue 89.9% 91.4% 95.2%
Services 8.6% 4.8% 3.8%Service revenue 10.1% 8.6% 4.8%
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total revenuesTotal revenues 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Total revenues 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

     We record reductions to revenue for estimated sales returns at the time of shipment. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, changes in customer demand, and other factors. If actual future returns and allowances differ from past experience, additional allowances may be required.

     We also maintain a separate allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer solvency, current economic and geographic trends, and changes in customer payment terms and practices when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

     Advertising Costs — Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred. Advertising expenses for fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 were approximately $2,543, $5,258 and $2,594, respectively.

Software Development Costs — The costs for the development of new software products and substantial enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at which time any additional costs would be capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 86,, “Accounting“Accounting for the Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased, or otherwiseOtherwise Marketed.”Because we believe our current process for developing software is essentially completed concurrently with the establishment of technological feasibility, which occurs upon the completion of a working model, no costs have been capitalized for any of the periods presented. In accordance with SOP 98-1,, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use,the cost of internally-developed software is capitalized and included in property and equipment at the point at which the conceptual formulation, design and testing of possible software project alternatives have been completed and management authorizes and commits to funding the project. Pilot projects and projects where expected future economic benefits are less than probable are not capitalized. Internally-developed software costs include the cost of software tools and licenses used in the development of our systems, as well as consulting costs. Completed projects are transferred to property and equipment at cost and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, generally three years.

44


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

     Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Exchange Contracts — For subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency, gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded within stockholders’ equity as part of cumulativeaccumulated other comprehensive loss. For subsidiaries where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar, gains and losses resulting from the process of remeasuring foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in other income.

49


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     In fiscal 2002, we determined that the functional currency of one of our subsidiaries had changed from the Euro to the U.S. Dollar. Accordingly, all monetary assets and liabilities were translated at the current exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date, nonmonetary assets and liabilities were translated at historical rates, and total revenues and expenses were translated at average exchange rates in effect during the period. Transaction gains and losses are included in other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

     We utilize forward exchange contracts to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The gains or losses on these contracts are included in income as the exchange rates change. Management believes that these forward contracts do not subject us to undue risk due to foreign exchange movements because gains and losses on these contracts are offset by losses and gains on the underlying assets and transactions being hedged.

Derivative Instruments — On May 1, 2001, weWe adopted SFAS 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges are adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the exposure being hedged, changes in fair value will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset or liability through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the hedge is recognized in earnings immediately. The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

     As a result of our significant international operations, we are subject to risks associated with fluctuating exchange rates. We use foreignderivative financial instruments, principally currency forward contracts, to attempt to minimize the impact of exchange rate movements on our balance sheet relating to certain foreign currency assets and liabilities and operating results. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Currently, we do not enter into any foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposures related to firm commitments or equity investments. Our major foreign currency exchange exposures and related hedging programs are described below:

     Balance Sheet. We utilize currency forward contracts to hedge currency exchange rate fluctuations related to certain foreign currency assets and liabilities. Gains and losses on these undesignated derivatives offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged and the net amount is included in earnings. In fiscal 2003, net gains generated by hedged assets and liabilities totaled $9,910, which were offset by losses on the related derivative instruments of $10,932. In fiscal 2002, net gains generated by hedged assets and liabilities totaled $1,684, which were offset by losses on the related derivative instruments of $3,485. In fiscal 2001, net losses generated by hedged assets and liabilities totaled $2,250, which were offset by gains on the related derivative instruments of $3,898. In fiscal 2000, net losses generated by hedged assets and liabilities totaled $2,745, which were offset by gains on the related derivative instruments of $1,102.

     Forecasted transactions. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Currently, we do not enter into any foreign exchangeuse currency forward contracts to hedge exposures related to forecasted sales and operating expenses denominated in Euros and British Pounds. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges when the transactions firm commitmentsare forecasted and in general closely match the underlying forecasted transactions in duration. The contracts are carried on the balance sheet at fair value and the effective portion of the contracts’ gains and losses is recorded as other comprehensive income until the forecasted transaction occurs.

     If the underlying forecasted transactions do not occur, or equity investments.it becomes probable that they will not occur, the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge is recognized immediately in other income. During fiscal 2003, we did not record any gains or losses related to forecasted transactions that did not occur or became improbable.

     We measure the effectiveness of hedges of forecasted transactions on at least a quarterly basis by comparing the fair values of the designated currency forward contracts with the fair values of the forecasted transactions. No ineffectiveness was recognized in earnings during fiscal 2003.

     Use of Estimates — The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to establish accounting policies which contain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

50


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Concentration of Credit Risk — Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, and accounts receivable. Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments consist primarily of U.S. government agencies, corporate bonds, U.S. commercial paper,and municipal securities,bonds, cash accounts held at various banks, and money market funds held at several financial institutions. We sell our products primarily to large organizations in different industries and geographies. Credit risk is mitigated by our credit evaluation process and limited payment terms. We do not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. In addition, we maintain an allowance for potential credit losses. In entering into forward foreign exchange contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The

45


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

counterparties to these contracts are major multinational commercial banks, and we do not expect any losses as a result of counterparty defaults.

     Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income for the years ending April 30, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 20002001 has been disclosed within the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at April 30, were as follows:

             
200320022001



Accumulated translation adjustments, net  (1,238)  (2,202)  (3,317)
Accumulated unrealized loss on derivatives  (29)      
Accumulated unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net  1,171   (164)  (1,418)
   
   
   
 
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss  (96)  (2,366)  (4,735)
   
   
   
 

     Net Income per Share — Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for that period. Diluted net income per share is computed giving effect to all dilutive potential shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental common shares subject to repurchase and common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.

51


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share computations for the periods presented:

                        
Years Ended April 30Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Net Income (Numerator):
Net Income (Numerator):
 
Net Income (Numerator):
 
Net Income $3,033 $74,886 $73,792 Net Income $76,472 $3,033 $74,886 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Shares (Denominator):
Shares (Denominator):
 
Shares (Denominator):
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding 331,798 320,692 299,554 Weighted average common shares outstanding 337,709 331,798 320,692 
Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase (153) (257) (184)Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase (62) (153) (257)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Shares used in basic computation 331,645 320,435 299,370 Shares used in basic computation 337,647 331,645 320,435 
Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase 153 257 184 Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase 62 153 257 
Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options 18,700 39,132 45,617 Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options 12,413 18,700 39,132 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Shares used in diluted computation 350,498 359,824 345,171 Shares used in diluted computation 350,122 350,498 359,824 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net Income per Share:
Net Income per Share:
 
Net Income per Share:
 
Basic $0.01 $0.23 $0.25 Basic $0.23 $0.01 $0.23 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Diluted $0.01 $0.21 $0.21 Diluted $0.22 $0.01 $0.21 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

     At April 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001, 44,582, 30,991, and 2000, 30,991, 18,005 and 537 shares of common stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $30.98, $40.17, $59.45, and $95.00$59.45 respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income per share computation, as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the periods.

     Stock-Based Compensation — We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and comply with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosures. Deferred compensation recognized under APB No. 25 is amortized to expense using the graded vesting method. We account for stock options issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and EITF No. 96-18 under the fair value based method.

     We adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123, and accordingly, no expense has been recognized for options granted to employees under the various Plans. We amortize deferred stock-based compensation on the graded vesting method over the vesting periods of the applicable stock purchase rights and stock options, generally four years. The graded vesting method provides for vesting of portions of the overall awards at interim dates and results in greater vesting in earlier years than the straight-line method. Had compensation expense been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards, consistent with

52


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company’s pro forma net loss and net loss per share would be as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

               
Years Ended April 30,

200320022001



Net income as reported $76,472  $3,033  $74,886 
 Add: stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income under APB 25, net of related tax effects  1,184   2,512   1,934 
 Deduct: total stock based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects  173,734   264,902   225,310 
   
   
   
 
  Pro forma net loss $(96,078) $(259,357) $(148,490)
   
   
   
 
Basic net income per share, as reported $0.23  $0.01  $0.23 
   
   
   
 
Diluted net income per share, as reported $0.22  $0.01  $0.21 
   
   
   
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share, pro forma $(0.28) $(0.78) $(0.46)
   
   
   
 

     During the preparation of the Company’s fiscal 2003 consolidated financial statements, management determined that the pro forma net loss and the pro forma net loss per share for fiscal 2002 and 2001 (for purposes of recording compensation for stock-based awards to employees under SFAS 123 for disclosure purposes) did not include the add-back of the APB 25 stock compensation expense and accordingly such amounts have been reflected. These changes did not impact the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of income, consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and consolidated statements of cash flow for any of the periods presented.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is not subject to revaluation as a result of subsequent stock price fluctuations. The following weighted-average assumptions are used:

                         
EmployeeEmployee
Stock Option PlansStock Purchase Plan
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200320022001200320022001






Expected Life (in years)  3.39   3.33   3.21   0.50   0.50   0.50 
Risk-free interest rate  2%-4%  5%  6%  1%  3%  6%
Volatility  76%- 79%  92%  80%  76%- 79%  92%  80%
Expected dividend                  

     The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. We use projected volatility rates, which are based upon historical volatility rates since our initial public offering, trended into future years. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our options.

53


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Statements of Cash Flows —Supplemental cash flow and noncash investing and financing activities are as follows:

                      
Years Ended April 30Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
 
Income taxes paid $8,460 $6,688 $4,517 Income taxes paid $7,952 $8,460 $6,688 
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
 
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
 
Deferred stock compensation, net of reversals (4,080) 14,093 1,805 Deferred stock compensation, net of reversals (441) (4,080) 14,093 
Income tax benefit from employee stock transactions 4,952 65,062 56,248 Income tax benefit from employee stock transactions 18,458 4,952 65,062 
Conversion of evaluation inventory to fixed assets 5,777 10,892 3,723 Conversion of evaluation inventory to fixed assets 9,340 5,777 10,892 
Common stock issued and options assumed for acquired businesses  101,237  Common stock issued and options assumed for acquired businesses   101,237 
Conversion of equity securities to short-term investments  6,000  Conversion of equity securities to short-term investments   6,000 
Milestone shares issued 3,015 3,000  Milestone shares issued 921 3,015 3,000 
Release of escrow shares 1,210   

46Recently Issued Accounting Standards —In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146,“Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,”which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally EITF Issue No. 94-3. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF Issue No. 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of the Company’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45,“Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 requires certain guarantees to be recorded at fair value and requires a guarantor to make disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee is remote. For those guarantees and indemnifications that do not fall within initial recognition and measurement requirements of FIN 45, the Company must continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the guarantees and indemnifications, as required under existing generally accepted accounting principles, to identify if a loss has been incurred. If the Company determines that it is probable that a loss has been incurred, any such estimable loss would be recognized. The initial recognition and measurement requirements do not apply to the Company’s product warranties or to the provisions contained in the majority of the Company’s software license agreements that indemnify licensees of the Company’s software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that the Company’s software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. The Company has provided disclosures for the year ended April 30, 2003 as required by FIN 45 in Note 14 to its consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect adoption of the liability recognition provisions to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In December 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 00-21,“Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” This issue addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. In some arrangements, the different revenue-generating activities (deliverables) are sufficiently separable and there exists sufficient evidence of their fair values to separately account for some or all of the deliverables (that is, there are separate units of accounting). In other arrangements, some or all of the deliverables are not independently functional, or there is not sufficient evidence of their fair values to account for them separately. This issue addresses when and, if

54


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

so, how an arrangement involving multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting. This issue does not change otherwise applicable revenue recognition criteria. The guidance in this issue is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect that the adoption of EITF 00-21 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

(DollarIn December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and share amountsDisclosure, an amendment to FASB Statement 123.” SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting of stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to require prominent disclosures in thousands, except per-share data)

Stock-Based Compensation — We record stockboth annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with provisionsand the effect of APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and all of its interpretations for employee awards, and in accordance with the method used on reported results. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 effective April 30, 2003.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,46,“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. for non-employee awards. Accordingly, we recognize the intrinsic value for employees and the fair value for non-employees as stock compensation expense over the vesting terms FIN 46 requires an investor with a majority of the awards.variable interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A variable interest entity is an entity in which the equity investors do not have a controlling interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from the other parties. The Company does not expect to identify any variable interest entities that must be consolidated.

     Recently Issued Accounting Standards —In June 2001,April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and149,“Amendment of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill133 on Derivative Instruments and Other Intangible Assets.Hedging Activities. Under SFAS No. 141, all business combinations initiated149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. In particular, this Statement clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative. It also clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component that warrants special reporting in the statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2001 must be accounted for using the purchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill2003 and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment (or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise). Separable intangible assets that areis not deemedexpected to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, we are required to adopt SFAS No. 142 effective May 1, 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we will stop the amortization of goodwill (including acquired existing workforce) with a net carrying value of approximately $49,779 at April 30, 2002 and the annual amortization of $15,177 that resulted from business combinations initiated prior to the adoption. We will evaluate goodwill under the SFAS No. 142 transitional impairment test. Any transitional impairment loss will be recognized as a change in accounting principle on the date of adoption. We have not determined whether adoption of SFAS No. 142 will have an impact on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flow.the Company upon adoption.

     In October 2001,May 2003, the FASB has issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting150,“Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” The Statement improves the Impairment or Disposalaccounting for certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity. The new Statement requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of Long-Lived Assets,” which addresses financial accounting and reportingposition. This statement is effective for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Assets to Be Disposed Of.” Adoption of SFAS No. 144interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company is required for our fiscal year beginning May 1, 2002. We are currently evaluating the potential impacteffect of this statement on its consolidated financial statement. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 144150 will have a material effect on ourits consolidated financial position and results of operations and have not yet determined the impact of adopting this statement.statements.

4755


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

3.     Balance Sheet Components

Short-term investments

     The following is a summary of investments at April 30, 2002:2003:

                         
UnrealizedGross Unrealized
Amortized
EstimatedAmortized
Estimated
CostGainsLossesFair ValueCostGainsLossesFair Value








Municipal bonds $7,999 $ $ $7,999  $8,031 $1 $ $8,032 
Corporate securities 1,000  417 583  311  55 256 
Corporate bonds 73,971 179 57 74,093  165,903 1,392 12 167,283 
U.S. government agencies 160,681 279 264 160,696  154,449 469 56 154,862 
Certificate of deposit 2,053 12  2,065 
U.S. commercial paper 2,180  1 2,179 
Money market funds 168,003   168,003  242,221   242,221 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Total debt and equity securities 411,654 458 738 411,374  575,148 1,874 124 576,898 
Less cash equivalents 168,003   168,003  242,221   242,221 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments $243,651 $458 $738 $243,371  $332,927 $1,874 $124 $334,677 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 

     The following is a summary of investments at April 30, 2001:2002:

             
             
Gross
UnrealizedUnrealized
Amortized
EstimatedAmortized
Estimated
CostGainsLossesFair ValueCostGainsLossesFair Value








Municipal bonds $27,581 $41 $ $27,622  $7,999 $ $ $7,999 
Municipal securities 186,650   186,650 
Corporate securities 5,827 267 2,722 3,372  1,000  417 583 
Corporate bonds 2,598 3  2,601  73,971 179 57 74,093 
U.S. Commercial Paper 112,998   112,998 
U.S. government agencies 160,681 279 264 160,696 
Money market funds 168,003   168,003 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Total debt and equity securities 335,654 311 2,722 333,243  411,654 458 738 411,374 
Less cash equivalents 241,149   241,149  168,003   168,003 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments $94,505 $311 $2,722 $92,094  $243,651 $458 $738 $243,371 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 

Inventories net

                
April 30,April 30,


2002200120032002




Purchased components $11,870 $11,106  $16,277 $11,870 
Work in process 1,431 560  537 1,431 
Finished goods 10,548 10,838  14,745 10,548 
 
 
  
 
 
 $23,849 $22,504  $31,559 $23,849 
 
 
  
 
 

4856


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

Property and Equipment

                
April 30,April 30,
April 30,20032002



20022001


Land and buildings $262,876 $ 
Land $158,316 $158,200 
Buildings and building improvements 109,959 84,621 
Leasehold improvements 12,304 18,943  14,129 12,304 
Computers, related equipment, and purchased software 123,164 101,329 
Computers, related equipment and purchased software 156,934 123,164 
Furnitures 18,327 15,841  19,814 18,327 
Construction in progress 4,978 7,909  26,530 25,033 
 
 
  
 
 
 421,649 144,022  485,682 421,649 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (76,454) (40,784) (122,820) (76,454)
 
 
  
 
 
 $345,195 $103,238  $362,862 $345,195 
 
 
  
 
 

4.     Commitments and Contingencies

     In fiscal 2002, we terminated our operating lease obligations for our Sunnyvale headquarters site by purchasing the land and buildings for $249.8 million.$249,840. As a result of headcount reductions in fiscal 2002, we are not currently utilizing certain existing spaces at our California headquarters site. Additionally, we have also exited office spaces under non-cancellable leases in other locations both in the United StatesU.S. and Europe. If we are unable to successfully sublease our vacated and unoccupied office spacesspace under operating leases, our operating results may be adversely affected. See Note 12“Note 12: Restructuring Charges.

     We lease other sales offices and research and development facilities throughout the United StatesU.S. and internationally. These sales offices are also leased under operating leases which expire through fiscal 2019. We are responsible for certain maintenance costs, taxes, and insurance under these leases. The aggregate annual minimum rent commitment under our operating leases is included in the minimum annual lease payments schedule below.

     Future minimum annual lease payments as of April 30, 2002,2003, are as follows:

         
Years Ending April 30Years Ending April 30


2003 $9,194 
20042004 7,786  $10,096 
20052005 7,624  8,702 
20062006 4,559  6,190 
20072007 2,817  3,739 
2008 2,918 
ThereafterThereafter 122,444  9,662 
 
  
 
Total lease payments $41,307 
Total lease payments $154,424  
 
 
 

     Rent expense was $12,609, $18,150, $18,090, and $7,779$18,090 for the years ended April 30, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000,2001, respectively. Rent expense under certain of our facility leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The difference between the amounts paid and the amounts expensed is classified as long-term obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

     We haveIn the past, we entered into agreements and established Network Appliance accounts with Deutsche Banc Alex.BrownAlex. Brown whereby we havehad the option to guarantee any defaults of certain margin loans made to two corporate officers by the financial institution on their Network Appliance stock. We haveIn the past, we also entered into an agreement and established a Network Appliance account with Goldman, Sachs and Co. whereby we have the option to guarantee any default of certain margin loan made to a third corporate officer by the financial

4957


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

had the option to guarantee any default of a certain margin loan made to a third corporate officer by the financial institution on his Network Appliance stock. The amount of the guarantee iswas limited to the excess, if any, of the amount of such loans over the fair market value of the Network Appliance stock securing the loans. As of April 30,August 26, 2002, there was no such amount.these accounts with Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown and Goldman, Sachs and Co. were closed.

     In May 2000, we entered into a split dollar insurance arrangement with our CEO. Under the arrangement, we will pay the annual premiums on several insurance policies on the life of the survivor of our CEO and his wife, and our CEO will reimburse us each year for a portion of those premiums equal to the economic value of the term insurance coverage provided him under the policies. For each of the 2001, 2002 and 20022003 fiscal years, we paid an aggregate net annual premium on these split dollar polices in the amount of $2,050. Under the arrangement, we will be reimbursed for all premium payments made on those policies, and it itsis intended that we will be reimbursed not later than May 2005. Upon the death of both our CEO and his wife or any earlier cash-out of the policies, we will be entitled to a refund of all cumulative premiums paid on these policies by us, and the balance will be paid to our CEO or his designated beneficiaries. The arrangement is terminable by us upon thirty (30)-days prior notice, and such termination will trigger a refund of the net cumulative premiums paid by us on the policies.

     From time to time, we have committed to purchase various key components used in the manufacture of our products. Our loss accrual for such commitments to these key component vendors areis based on our current forecasts of inventory usage. We establish accruals for estimated losses on purchased components for which we believe it is probable that they will not be utilized in future operations. To the extent that such forecasts are not achieved, our commitments and associated accruals may change.

     We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which may arise in the normal course of business. We do not believe that any current litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition.

5.     Line of Credit

     In July 1998, we negotiated a $5,000 unsecured revolving credit facility with a domestic commercial bank. Under terms of the credit facility, which expires in October 2002,December 2003, we must maintain various financial covenants. Any borrowings under this agreement bear interest at either LIBOR plus 1% or at the lender’s “prime” lending rate, such rate determined at our discretion. There were noAs of April 30, 2003, the amounts outstanding under this line of credit at April 30, 2002 or 2001.amounted to $1,194 relating to workers’ compensation and a foreign lease.

     We also have foreign exchange facilities used for hedging arrangements with several banks that allow us to enter into foreign exchange contracts of up to $135,000,$125,000, of which $44,397$7,484 was available at April 30, 2002.2003.

6.     Stockholders’ Equity

     Stock Splits — On December 20, 1999 and March 22, 2000, we effected two-for-one stock splits of the outstanding shares of common stock. All share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to the stock splits.

Preferred Stock — Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders.

     Stock Option Plans— We adopted the 1993 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan (the “1993 Plan”) in April 1993. In September 1995, we adopted the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”). The 1995 Plan replaced the 1993 Plan and provides for the grant of options and the issuance of common stock under terms substantially the same as those provided under the 1993 Plan, except that the 1995 Plan does not allow for the

50


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

exercise of options prior to vesting. Accordingly, all options and shares issued under the 1993 Plan were incorporated into the 1995 Plan upon the effectiveness of our initial public offering.

58


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Under the 1995 Plan, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may grant to employees, directors and consultants options to purchase shares of our common stock. The exercise price for an incentive stock option and a nonqualified stock option cannot be less than 100% and 85%, respectively, of the fair market value of our common stock as determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors on the date of grant. Options granted under the 1995 Plan generally vest at a rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and then ratably over the following 36 months. Options expire as determined by the boardBoard of directors,Directors, but not more than ten years after the date of grant.

     In April 1997, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors adopted the Special NonofficerNon-officer Stock Option Plan (the “Nonofficer“Non-officer Plan”) which provides for the grant of options and the issuance of common stock under terms substantially the same as those provided under the 1995 Plan, except that the NonofficerNon-officer Plan allows only for the issuance of nonqualified options to nonofficernon-officer employees.

     In August 1999, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors adopted the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999 Plan”), which is comprised of two separate equity incentive programs: (i) the Discretionary Option Grant Program under which options may be granted to eligible individuals during the service period at a fixed price per share and (ii) the Automatic Option Grant Program under which nonemployee board members will automatically receive special option grants at designated intervals over their period of board service.

     The 1999 Plan will supplement the existing 1995 Plan and NonofficerNon-officer Plan and those plans will continue to remain in full force and effect until all available shares have been issued under each such plan. However, the Automatic Option Grant Program previously in effect under the 1995 Plan terminated as of October 26, 1999, and all automatic option grants made to nonemployee board members on or after that date will be made under the 1999 Plan.

     Under the 1999 Plan, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may grant to employees, directors and consultants and other independent advisors options to purchase shares of our common stock during their period of service with us. The exercise price for an incentive stock option and a nonstatutory option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. Options granted under the 1999 Plan generally vest at a rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and then ratably over the following 36 months. Options will have a term of ten years after the date of grant, subject to earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events. In fiscal 2002,2003, the 1999 plan was amended to increase the share reserve by an additional 13,40014,000 shares of common stock and effect certain changes to the Automatic Option Grant Program in effect for the nonemployee members of the boardBoard of directors.Directors.

     Options granted under the 1999 Plan are subject to the cancellation/regrant program with the following limitations: (i) only options held by employees who are neither executive officers nor members of the board can be repriced; and (ii) the total number of repriced options will not exceed ten percent10% of the total number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 1999 Plan.

     In fiscal 2001, we assumed various stock option plans in connection with our Orca and WebManage acquisitions. Pursuant to the provisions of the merger agreements, outstanding shares were exchanged under certain exchange ratios in effect at the time of each merger. Options granted under these plans generally vest at a rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and then ratably over the following 36 months. Options expire as determined by the boardBoard of directors,Directors, but not more than ten years after the date of grant.

5159


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

     A summary of the combined activity under our stock option plans and agreements is as follows:

                          
Outstanding OptionsOutstanding Options


SharesWeighted
AvailableAverage
forNumberExercise
Grantof SharesPrice



Balances, April 30, 1999 (26,348 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $1.73) 22,320 69,972 $3.53 
Shares reserved for plan 13,200   Weighted
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $13.98) (25,773) 25,773 28.60 SharesAverage
Options exercised  (18,976) 2.55 AvailableNumberExercise
Options canceled 3,127 (3,127) 7.19 for Grantof SharesPrice
 
 
 


Balances, April 30, 2000 (24,845 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $2.87)Balances, April 30, 2000 (24,845 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $2.87) 12,874 73,642 12.45 Balances, April 30, 2000 (24,845 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $2.87) 12,874 73,642 $12.45 
Shares reserved for plan 15,614   Shares reserved for plan 15,614   
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $26.84) (17,868) 17,868 45.03 Options granted (weighted average fair value of $26.84) (17,868) 17,868 45.03 
Options exercised  (15,484) 4.41 Options exercised  (15,484) 4.41 
Options canceled 3,462 (3,462) 25.92 Options canceled 3,462 (3,462) 25.92 
 
 
   
 
 
Balances, April 30, 2001 (30,285 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $9.01)Balances, April 30, 2001 (30,285 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $9.01) 14,082 72,564 21.50 Balances, April 30, 2001 (30,285 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $9.01) 14,082 72,564 21.50 
Shares reserved for plan 13,400   Shares reserved for plan 13,400   
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $10.03) (16,444) 16,444 16.15 Options granted (weighted average fair value of $10.03) (16,444) 16,444 16.15 
Options exercised  (5,291) 3.88 Options exercised  (5,291) 3.40 
Options canceled 4,198 (4,198) 37.04 Options canceled 4,198 (4,198) 37.04 
 
 
   
 
 
Balances, April 30, 2002 15,236 79,519 $20.74 
Balances, April 30, 2002 (42,664 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $16.06)Balances, April 30, 2002 (42,664 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $16.06) 15,236 79,519 20.74 
 
 
 Shares reserved for plan 14,000   
Options expired (215)   
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $5.64) (10,616) 10,616 10.25 
Options exercised  (4,130) 3.40 
Options canceled 5,341 (5,341) 27.66 
 
 
 
 23,746 80,664 $19.79 
 
 
 

     Additional information regarding options outstanding as of April 30, 20022003 is as follows:

                     
Options Outstanding

WeightedOptions Exercisable
Average
RemainingWeightedWeighted
NumberContractualAverageAverage
Range ofOutstanding atLifeExerciseNumberExercise
Exercise PricesApril 30, 2002(in years)PriceExercisablePrice






$ 0.01 - $  2  .45 9,590   4.47  $1.67   9,442  $1.69 
2.74 -    4.  51 11,338   5.89   3.97   10,200   3.91 
4.80 -   11.2  5 10,700   7.08   9.11   6,989   8.81 
11.55 -   15.  32 13,454   8.88   14.10   3,099   13.22 
15.72 -   20.  16 13,250   8.39   18.93   5,124   18.60 
20.52 -   31.  25 8,066   8.88   24.87   2,071   28.52 
33.63 -   53.  94 8,336   8.06   51.00   3,555   50.33 
56.94 -  124.9  9 4,785   8.16   88.78   2,184   88.71 
   
           
     
$ 0.01 - $124.  99 79,519   7.47  $20.74   42,664  $16.06 
   
           
     
                             
Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable
Weighted
AverageWeightedWeighted
NumberRemainingAverageAverage
Range ofOutstanding atContractualExerciseNumberExercise
Exercise PricesApril 30, 2003Life (in years)PriceExercisablePrice






$0.01  -  $2.74   8,673   3.55  $1.82   8,669  $1.82 
2.94  -   4.51   9,033   5.06   4.15   8,857   4.16 
4.80  -   7.99   3,480   6.14   6.07   2,875   5.74 
8.05  -   9.99   8,645   9.02   9.83   1,774   9.52 
10.24  -   12.00   8,575   7.04   11.19   6,192   11.20 
12.05  -   15.32   11,053   8.04   14.40   4,913   14.04 
15.72  -   20.16   12,177   7.47   18.90   7,510   18.72 
20.52  -   42.50   8,498   7.71   27.52   4,792   30.24 
46.56  -   78.06   8,239   7.10   57.60   5,561   57.86 
80.96  -   122.19   2,291   7.25   106.21   1,601   105.64 
           
           
     
$0.01  -  $122.19   80,664   6.90  $19.79   52,744  $18.97 
           
           
     

60


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Employee Stock Purchase Plan— Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), employees are entitled to purchase shares of our common stock at 85% of the fair market value at certain specified dates. In fiscal 2002,2003, the plan was amended to increase the share reserve by an additional 3,0002,400 shares of common stock and extend the term of the ESPP to the last business day of May, 2011.stock. Of the 11,20013,600 shares authorized to be

52


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

issued under this plan, 4,1715,156 shares were available for issuance at April 30, 2002,2003, 1,414, 1,094, and 1,094, 448 and 1,473 shares were issued in fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000,2001, respectively, at a weighted average price of $10.74, $14.60, and $27.96 and $3.87, respectively.

Pro Forma Information — As discussed in Note 2, we continue to account for our stock-based awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and its related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized in the financial statements for employee stock arrangements with the exception of $7,202, $6,223, and $1,345 in fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively, which consists of the amortization of deferred stock compensation related to the granting of nonqualified stock options at exercise prices below market, the recognition of stock compensation of unvested options assumed in the WebManage acquisition, and the issue of contingently issuable milestone shares.

Our calculations are based on a multiple option valuation approach, and forfeitures are recognized as they occur. Pro forma information under SFAS 123 is as follows:

             
Years Ended April 30,

200220012000



Net income (loss) $(263,544) $(151,713) $18,622 
Net income (loss) per share, basic  (0.79)  (0.47)  0.06 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted  (0.79)  (0.47)  0.05 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is not subject to revaluation as a result of subsequent stock price fluctuations. The following weighted-average assumptions are used:

                         
Employee StockEmployee Stock
Option PlansPurchase Plan
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200220012000






Expected Life (in years)  3.33   3.21   3.20   0.50   0.50   0.50 
Risk-free interest rate  5%  6%  6%  3%  6%  5%
Volatility  92%  80%  65%  92%  80%  65%
Expected dividend                  

     The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. We use projected volatility rates, which are based upon historical volatility rates since initial public offering, trended into future years. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our options.

     Deferred Stock Compensation— We recorded $1,171, $1,301, $14,127, and $1,845$14,127 of deferred compensation in fiscal 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively, primarily related to the recognition of stock compensation of unvested options assumed in the WebManage acquisition, and the grant of stock options to certain highly compensated employees. We reversed $1,612, $5,381 $34, and $40$34 of deferred compensation in fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000,2001, respectively, due to employee terminations. The reversal in fiscal 2002reversals were primarily related to the forfeiture of unvested options assumed in the WebManage acquisition as a result of employee terminations.

53


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

     Under terms of the 1995 Stock Option Plan, highly compensated employees as defined by our management are eligible to contribute between $15 and $75 in annual salary for the rights to be granted nonqualified stock options. The discount from fair market value, which is equal to the amount of salary contributed, has been recorded as deferred stock compensation expense. The deferred compensation expense is amortized ratably over a one-year period.

     InEstimated future deferred stock compensation amortization relating to assumed WebManage unvested options and deferred salary investment options for fiscal 2001, under2004 are expected to be $1,187. For fiscal 2005, estimated future stock compensation amortization expenses are $176 and none thereafter.

     Under terms of the acquisition agreement with WebManage,Orca, we issued an additional 101released shares of common stock to former WebManage stockholdersOrca shareholders upon Orca’s meeting certain performance criteria. The fair market valuevalues of thethese shares of $3,000 waswere measured on the date the performance criteria were met and waswere recognized as stock compensation.

     In During fiscal 2003 and 2002, under terms of the acquisition agreement with Orca, we released an additional 99 and 165 shares of common stock, to former Orca stockholders upon meeting certainrespectively, valued in the aggregate at $921 and $3,015, respectively. There are no additional performance criteria. Themilestones remaining.

     We recorded $748 in compensation expense in fiscal 2003 for the fair market value of options granted to a member of the sharesBoard of $3,015 was measured onDirectors in recognition for services performed outside of the date the performance criteria were met and was recognized as stock compensation.

     In fiscal 2002, we issued an option grantnormal capacity of 100,000a board member. The 100 common shares of common stock under the 1999 Plan to a nonemployee board member withwere granted at an exercise price of $15.72 per share, the fair market value per share on the grant date, in recognition for services performed outside of the normal capacity of a board member.date. The option has a term of 10 years measured from the grant date, subject to earlier termination following his cessation of board service, and will vest in a series of 48 successive equal monthly installments upon his completion of each month of board service over the 48 month period measured from the grant date.

7.     Income Taxes

Income before income taxes is as follows:

               
Years Ended April 30,

200220012000



Domestic $(30,482) $105,262  $105,806 
 Foreign  33,015   27,747   8,600 
   
   
   
 
  Total $2,533  $133,009  $114,406 
   
   
   
 

The provision for income taxes consists     In fiscal 2003, we reached a final settlement of the following:

               
Years Ended April 30,

200220012000



Current:
            
 Federal $(3,141) $50,383  $41,475 
 State  (134)  20,075   7,973 
 Foreign  5,356   9,670   2,780 
   
   
   
 
Total current  2,081   80,128   52,228 
   
   
   
 
Deferred:
            
 Federal  1,552   (7,556)  (8,631)
 State  (4,133)  (14,449)  (2,983)
   
   
   
 
 Total deferred  (2,581)  (22,005)  (11,614)
   
   
   
 
  Provision/(benefit) for income taxes $(500) $58,123  $40,614 
   
   
   
 
escrow fund arrangement under the WebManage acquisition agreement. We have determined the total amount of our losses under the settlement arrangement and 11 restricted shares were released from the escrow and delivered to Network Appliance, valued in the aggregate at $1,210 based on the fair market value of our common stock as of the date of the acquisition. Accordingly, an adjustment was made to the cost of the WebManage acquisition. The balance of the escrow shares has been distributed to former shareholders of WebManage in proportion to their share ownership in WebManage, as provided in the original merger agreement.

54     In fiscal 2001, under terms of the acquisition agreement with WebManage, we issued an additional 101 shares of common stock to former WebManage stockholders upon WebManage’s meeting certain performance criteria. The fair market value of the shares of $3,000 was measured on the date the performance criteria were met and was recognized as stock compensation.

61


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

7.Income Taxes

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)Income before income taxes is as follows:

              
Years Ended April 30,

200320022001



Domestic $43,793  $(30,482) $105,262 
Foreign  54,022   33,015   27,747 
   
   
   
 
 Total $97,815  $2,533  $133,009 
   
   
   
 

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

               
Years Ended April 30,

200320022001



Current:
            
 Federal $23,121  $(3,141) $50,383 
 State  4,406   (134)  20,075 
 Foreign  12,863   5,356   9,670 
   
   
   
 
 Total current  40,390   2,081   80,128 
   
   
   
 
Deferred:
            
 Federal  (18,528)  1,552   (7,556)
 State  (519)  (4,133)  (14,449)
   
   
   
 
 Total deferred  (19,047)  (2,581)  (22,005)
   
   
   
 
  Provision (benefit) for income taxes $21,343  $(500) $58,123 
   
   
   
 

     The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

                    
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Tax computed at federal statutory rate $886 $46,553 $40,042  $34,236 $886 $46,553 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit (2,774) 3,657 5,720  (727) (2,774) 3,657 
Federal and state credits (3,543) (1,976) (2,623) (3,858) (3,543) (1,976)
Tax exempt interest (582) (4,467) (3,301) (2) (582) (4,467)
In process research and development  9,341     9,341 
Goodwill amortization 5,098 3,070    5,098 3,070 
Deferred acquisition costs 1,056    322 1,056  
Foreign earnings in lower tax jurisdiction (1,469)    (7,978) (1,469)  
Other 828 1,945 776  (650) 828 1,945 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes $(500) $58,123 $40,614 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $21,343 $(500) $58,123 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

     The income tax benefits associated with disposition from employee stock transactions of $18,458, $4,952, $65,062, and $56,248,$65,062 respectively, for fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000,2001, were recognized as additional paid in capital.

62


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     The components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

                  
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


2002200120032002




Inventory reserves and capitalizationInventory reserves and capitalization $12,020 $19,235 Inventory reserves and capitalization $9,914 $12,020 
Reserves and accruals not currently deductibleReserves and accruals not currently deductible 12,024 8,099 Reserves and accruals not currently deductible 13,368 12,024 
Net operating loss and credit carryforwardsNet operating loss and credit carryforwards 371,898 335,145 Net operating loss and credit carryforwards 336,037 371,898 
Deferred stock compensationDeferred stock compensation 3,767 2,788 Deferred stock compensation 4,830 3,767 
Deferred revenueDeferred revenue 10,768 10,934 Deferred revenue 31,494 10,768 
Capitalized research and development expendituresCapitalized research and development expenditures 16,622 12,522 Capitalized research and development expenditures 16,705 16,622 
Write-down of investmentsWrite-down of investments 5,203  Write-down of investments 3,237 5,203 
Unrealized loss on investments 109 985 
Unrealized gain (loss) on investmentsUnrealized gain (loss) on investments (572) 109 
OtherOther 323 895 Other 756 323 
 
 
   
 
 
Gross deferred tax assetsGross deferred tax assets 432,734 390,603 Gross deferred tax assets 415,769 432,734 
Valuation allowanceValuation allowance (367,613) (330,860)Valuation allowance (336,037) (367,613)
 
 
   
 
 
Deferred tax assets 65,121 59,743 Deferred tax assets 79,732 65,121 
DepreciationDepreciation (4,126) (1,134)Depreciation (2,286) (4,126)
State deferred taxesState deferred taxes (8,213) (6,767)State deferred taxes (8,197) (8,213)
Acquisition intangiblesAcquisition intangibles (3,870) (5,512)Acquisition intangibles (1,174) (3,870)
 
 
   
 
 
Deferred tax liabilities (16,209) (13,413)Deferred tax liabilities (11,657) (16,209)
 
 
   
 
 
Net deferred tax assetsNet deferred tax assets $48,912 $46,330 Net deferred tax assets $68,075 $48,912 
 
 
   
 
 

     Current net deferred tax assets are $32,529$27,444 and $36,287,$32,529 as of fiscal 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively. Non-current net deferred tax assets for fiscal 2003 and 2002 are $40,631 and 2001 are $16,383 and $10,043, respectively, and are included in other assets within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

     As of fiscal 2002,2003, the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $832,681$771,661 and $160,687,$151,454, respectively. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2011, and the state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2006. As of

55


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

fiscal 2002,2003, we had federal and state credit carryforwards of approximately $34,406$36,380 and $31,602,$32,112, respectively, available to offset future taxable income. These federal and state credit carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2013 and the state credits will begin to expire in fiscal 2008.2009.

     We have provided a valuation allowance on certain of our deferred tax assets because of uncertainty regarding their realizability due to expectation of future employee stock option exercises. Deferred tax assets of approximately $367,613$336,037 and $330,860$367,613 at the end of fiscal 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively, pertain to certain tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. If recognized, the tax benefit of these credits and losses will be accounted for as a credit to stockholders’ equity rather than as a reduction of the income tax provision.

8.8.     Segment, Geographic and Customer Information

     Under SFAS 131, “Disclosures“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” we operate in one reportable industry segment: the design, manufacturing, marketing and technical support of high-performance networked storage solutions. We market our products in the United StatesU.S. and in foreign countries through our sales personnel and our subsidiaries. The Chief Executive Officer is our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), as defined by SFAS 131. The CODM evaluates resource allocation decisions and

63


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

operational performance based upon revenue by geographic regions of the segment. Under paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131, we have one reportable segment as all the geographic operating segments identified can be aggregated into one reportable segment. For the years ended April 30, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, we recorded revenue from customers throughout the United StatesU.S. and Canada; Europe; Latin America, Australia and Asia Pacific.

     The following presents total revenues for the years ended April 30, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 20002001 by geographic area and long-lived assets as of April 30, 20022003 and 20012002 by geographic area.

                          
Years Ended April 30,Years Ended April 30,


200220012000200320022001






Total Revenues:
Total Revenues:
 
Total Revenues:
 
United StatesUnited States $463,162 $623,704 $401,377 United States $516,908 $463,162 $623,704 
InternationalInternational 335,207 382,482 177,923 International $375,160 335,207 382,482 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total revenues $798,369 $1,006,186 $579,300 Total revenues $892,068 $798,369 $1,006,186 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Long-lived Assets:
Long-lived Assets:
 
Long-lived Assets:
 
United StatesUnited States $415,372 $198,468 United States $451,473 $415,372 
InternationalInternational 14,306 8,520 International 14,208 14,306 
 
 
   
 
 
Total Long-lived Assets $429,678 $206,988 Total Long-lived Assets $465,681 $429,678 
 
 
   
 
 

     Total revenues above are attributed to regions based on the customers’ shipment locations.

     International sales include export sales primarily to the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, France, Israel, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Canada and Australia. No single foreign country accounted for 10% or more of total revenues in fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000.2001.

     No customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues in fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001, or 2000.

2001.

9.9.     Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     The following summary disclosures are made in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures“Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments”,Instruments,” which requires the disclosure of fair value information about both on-and off-balance sheet financial instruments where it is practicable to estimate the

56


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

value. Fair value is defined in SFAS 107 as the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Because SFAS 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements, any aggregation of the fair value amounts presented would not represent the underlying value of the Company. Amounts at April 30 consist of:

                  
Years Ended April 30,

20022001


CarryingEstimatedCarryingEstimated
AmountFair ValueAmountFair Value




Assets:                
 Cash and cash equivalents $210,756  $210,756  $271,931  $271,931 
 Short-term investments  243,371   243,371   92,094   92,094 
 Other investments in equity securities  1,724   1,724   10,084   10,084 
 Restricted cash        193,747   193,747 
                  
Years Ended April 30,

20032002


CarryingEstimatedCarryingEstimated
AmountFair ValueAmountFair Value




Assets:                
 Cash and cash equivalents $284,161  $284,161  $210,756  $210,756 
 Short-term investments  334,677   334,677   243,371   243,371 
 Other investments in equity securities  909   909   1,724   1,724 
 Restricted cash  1,142   1,142       

64


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge trade and intercompany receivables and payables as well as future sales and operating expenses against future movement in foreign exchange rates. All hedge contracts are marked to market through earnings every period.

     The forward foreign exchange contracts require us to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. dollars or vice versa and generally mature in less than one monthyear. As of April 30, 2003, we had $117,468 of outstanding foreign exchange contracts in Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Swiss Francs, Canadian Dollars and European Currency Units, that had remaining maturities of five months or less. For the balance sheet hedges, these contracts are adjusted to fair value at the end of each month and are included in other income (expense), net. For the cash flow hedges, the related gains or losses are included in other comprehensive income. As of April 30, 2002, we had $90,459 of outstanding foreign exchange contracts in Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Swiss Francs and European Currency Units, that had remaining maturities of one month or less. As of April 30, 2001, we had $81,944 of outstanding foreign exchange contracts in British Pounds, Swiss Francs and European Currency Units, that had remaining maturities of one month or less. These foreign exchange contracts are adjusted to the fair value at the end of every month and are included in other income (expense), net. Gains and losses on these foreign exchange contracts are offset by losses and gains on the underlying assets and liabilities. At April 30, 20022003 and 2001,2002, the estimated fair values of forward foreign exchange contracts were $90,603$117,516 and $82,385,$90,603, respectively. Unrealized gains or losses on foreign exchange contracts were not significant at April 30, 2002.2003. The fair value of foreign exchange contracts is based on prevailing financial market information. Other than foreign exchange contracts, we have not entered into any other material financial derivative instruments.

     Approximately $193,747 of our investment portfolio at April 30, 2001 was invested in a certificate of deposit and was restricted to collateralize our operating leases and classified as non-current restricted cash. In fiscal 2002, the restricted investments were converted to property and equipment on the balance sheet as we discontinued our operating leases by purchasing the land and buildings at our Sunnyvale, California headquarters site.

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate their carrying value. The fair value of short-term investments and foreign exchange contracts is based on quoted market prices. Other investments in equity securities comprise investments in companies in the volatile high-technology market.

10.10.     Employee Benefit Plan

     We have established a 401(k) tax-deferred savings plan (“Savings Plan”). Employees meeting the eligibility requirements, as defined, may contribute specified percentages of their salaries. We contributed $1,315, $1,235 $1,109, and $611$1,109 for fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, and 2000, respectively.

57


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

11. Acquisitions

     In June 2000, we completed the acquisition of Orca, a Waltham, Massachusetts-based developer of high performance Virtual Interface (VI) Architecture software for enterprise-class UNIX and Windows systems. The acquisition fits with our strategy of developing highly available and reliable intelligent storage solutions that improve the performance of today’s Internet and enterprise applications and strengthen our ability to develop next generation storage networking architectures and protocols. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Under terms of the agreement, we acquired Orca for $50,037 in common stock, assumed options and cash, with an obligation to provide 264 shares of common stock, which will result in additional stock compensation charges if certain performance criteria are achieved. CertainOrca met certain performance criteria were met and as such, 165 shares of common stock werewe issued and recorded during fiscal 2002.2003 and 2002 an additional 99 and 165 shares of common stock. The fair market value of such shares of $921 and $3,015, respectively, was measured on the date Orca met the performance criteria were met and was recognized as stock compensation. The remaining 99 shares of contingently issuable common stock will be issued if certaincompensation in fiscal 2003 and 2002. There are no additional performance criteria are achieved.milestones remaining. We also paid certain transaction costs and assumed certain operating assets and liabilities.

     The purchase price of the transaction was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. Approximately $26,688 was allocated to in-process research and development and charged to operations because the acquired technology had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses. The value was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired in-process technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net

65


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

cash flows from such projects, and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. The discount rate included a factor that took into account the uncertainty surrounding the successful development of the acquired in-process technology. These estimates are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the development process, and no assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur. Excluding the charge that may result from 264 contingently issuable common shares, research and development costs to bring the products from Orca to technological feasibility are not expected to have a material impact on our future results of operations or financial condition. Costs incurred prior to establishment of technological feasibility are charged to research and development expense and have not been material through April 30, 2002.2003. The Orca acquisition has been successfully utilized for the design and development of the DAFS protocol. By eliminating much of the traditional operating system overhead, DAFS allows for improved I/ O performance while using fewer CPU cycles. The protocol leverages next generation networking technologies that provide remote memory transfer capabilities, including RDMA implemented in VI and Infiniband. The DAFS protocol has good industry support and is now under consideration as an industry standard. We introduced DAFS capable product in April 2002.

     In November 2000, we completed the acquisition of WebManage, a Chelmsford, Massachusetts-based software developer of content management, distribution, and analysis solutions. WebManage develops software that intelligently distributes content between various points on the Internet and enables organizations to plan, manage and deliver Internet/intranet services. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Under terms of the agreement, we acquired WebManage for $59,371 in common stock, assumed options, and cash. We also had an obligation to provide shares of common stock to be valued at $3,000 if WebManage achieved certain performance criteria were achieved. Thecriteria. WebManage met these performance criteria were met in March 2001 and as such, the contingent consideration has beenwas recorded as stock compensation in the fourth quarter of 2001. We also paid certain transaction costs and assumed certain operating assets and liabilities.

58     In fiscal 2003, we reached a final settlement of the escrow fund arrangement under the WebManage acquisition agreement. We have determined the total amount of our losses under the settlement arrangement and 11 restricted shares were released from the escrow and delivered to Network Appliance, valued in the aggregate at $1,210 based on the fair market value of our common stock as of the date of the acquisition. Accordingly, an adjustment was made to the cost of the WebManage acquisition. The balance of the escrow shares has been distributed to former shareholders of WebManage in proportion to their share ownership in WebManage, as provided in the original merger agreement.

66


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

     The total purchase prices and final allocation (prior to shares released from escrow valued at $1,210) among the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired in these two transactions (including purchased in-process technology) are summarized as follows(in thousands):

                 
OrcaWebManage


Total Purchase Price:                
Total cash consideration $2,000  $4,970         
Value of shares issued  23,526   41,909         
Value of options assumed  24,053   24,053         
Deferred stock compensation     (12,304)        
Transaction costs  458   743         
   
   
         
  $50,037  $59,371         
   
   
         
                  
Amortization Period
(Years)

Purchase Price Allocation:                
Tangible assets $353  $868         
Intangible assets:                
 Existing Technology     17,179   3     
 Existing Workforce  423   1,380   3   (prior to fiscal 2003)
 Goodwill  24,101   48,085   5   (prior to fiscal 2003)
In-process R&D  26,688      Expensed     
Tangible liabilities  (1,359)  (1,276)        
Deferred income taxes  (169)  (6,865)        
   
   
         
  $50,037  $59,371         
   
   
         

     Total Purchase Price:

             
OrcaWebManage


Total cash consideration $2,000  $4,970     
Value of shares issued  23,526   41,909     
Value of options assumed  24,053   24,053     
Deferred stock compensation     (12,304)    
Transaction costs  458   743     
   
   
     
  $50,037  $59,371     
   
   
     
            
Purchase Price Allocation:          
Tangible assets $353  $868  Amortization Period
Intangible assets:         (Years)
          
 Existing Technology     17,179  3
 Existing Workforce  423   1,380  3
 Goodwill  24,101   48,085  5
In-process R&D  26,688     Expensed
Tangible liabilities  (1,359)  (1,276)  
Deferred income taxes  (169)  (6,865)  
   
   
   
  $50,037  $59,371   
   
   
   

In accordance with FASB interpretation No. 44, “Accounting“Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation,” we recorded the intrinsic value, measured as the difference between the grant price and fair market value on the acquisition consummation date, of unvested options assumed in the WebManage acquisition as deferred stock compensation. Such deferred stock compensation, which aggregated to $12,304, is recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and will be amortized over the vesting term of the related options.

     The operating results of Orca and WebManage have been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations since theirthe respective acquisition dates. The following unaudited pro forma consolidated amounts give effect to these acquisitions as if they had occurred on April 30, 19992000 by consolidating the results of operations of the acquired entities with our results for the yearsyear ended April 30, 2001 and April 30, 2000.

          
Years Ended April 30,

20012000


(In thousands)
Revenues $1,006,738  $581,206 
Net Income $88,197  $51,092 
Net Income per share:        
 Basic $0.28  $0.17 
   
   
 
 Diluted $0.24  $0.15 
   
   
 
Shares used in per share calculation:        
 Basic  320,712   300,288 
   
   
 
 Diluted  360,160   346,433 
   
   
 
2001.

5967


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)
      
Year Ended
April 30, 2001

(In thousands)
Revenues $1,006,738 
Net Income $88,197 
Net Income per share:    
 Basic $0.28 
   
 
 Diluted $0.24 
   
 
Shares used in per share calculation:    
 Basic  320,712 
   
 
 Diluted  360,160 
   
 

     The pro-forma results of operations give effect to certain adjustments, including amortization of purchased intangibles, goodwill, contingently issuable shares, common stock, and assumed options in connection with the acquisitions. The $26,688 charge for purchased in-process research and development has been excluded from the pro-forma results, as it is a material nonrecurring charge.

12.     Restructuring Charges

  Fiscal 2002 Second Quarter Restructuring Plan:

Fiscal 2002 Second Quarter Restructuring Plan

     In August 2001, we implemented a restructuring plan, which included a reduction in workforce by approximately 200 employees and a consolidation of facilities. The action was required to properly align and manage the business commensurate with our then current revenue levels. All functional areas of the Company were affected by the reduction. We completed our actions during the second quarter of fiscal 2002. As a result of this restructuring, we incurred a charge of $7,980. The restructuring charge included $4,796 of severance-related amounts, $2,656 of committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and $528 in fixed assets write-offs. The reserve balance of $807 at April 30, 2003 was included in other accrued liabilities.

     During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we purchased our Sunnyvale headquarters site and terminated the operating leases. As a result, an adjustment was made to reduce the previously recorded estimated facilities lease losses by $1,509. During fiscal 2003, we recorded a net restructuring adjustment of $334 due to changes in the estimated costs of certain actions and final resolution of certain restructuring activities. In the event that the foreign facilities are not subleased, we will be obligated for additional total lease payments of approximately $659 to be payable through January 2006.

68


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the restructuring reserve at April 30, 2003 and 2002:

                              
Severance-Fixed AssetsSeverance-Fixed Assets
Related AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotalRelated AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotal








Restructuring charge $4,796 $528 $2,656 $7,980  $4,796 $528 $2,656 $7,980 
Cash payments (4,508)  (803) (5,311) (4,508)  (803) (5,311)
Non-cash portion  (528) (37) (565)  (528) (37) (565)
Adjustments (95)  (1,509) (1,604) (95)  (1,509) (1,604)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2002 $193 $ $307 $500  $193 $ $307 $500 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Cash payments 64  (82) (18)
Non-cash portion   (9) (9)
Adjustments 410  (76) 334 
 
 
 
 
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2003 $667 $ $140 $807 
 
 
 
 
 

  Fiscal 2002 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Plan:

Fiscal 2002 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Plan

     In April 2002, we announced and substantially completed a restructuring related to the closure of an engineering facility and consolidation of resources to the Sunnyvale headquarters, which included a headcount reduction of 34 employees. As a result of this restructuring, we incurred a charge of $5,850. The restructuring charge included $813 of severance-related amounts, $4,564 of committed excess facilities and facility closure expenses, and $473 in fixed assets write-off. Of the reserve balance at April 30, 2003, $1,485 was included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $3,086 was classified as long-term obligations.

     In January 2003, we updated our assumptions and estimates based on certain triggering events, which resulted in an additional net charge of $923, primarily relating to our engineering facility lease. Our estimates are reviewed and revised periodically and may result in a substantial charge to restructuring expense, should different conditions prevail than were anticipated in original management estimates. Such estimates included various assumptions such as the time period over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease terms, and expected sublease rates. In the event that the engineering facility is not subleased, we will be obligated for additional total lease payments of $3,385 to be payable through November 2010.

     The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the restructuring reserve at April 30, 2003 and 2002:

                              
Severance-Fixed AssetsSeverance-Fixed Assets
Related AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotalRelated AmountsWrite-OffFacilityTotal








Restructuring charge $813 $473 $4,564 $5,850  $813 $473 $4,564 $5,850 
Cash payments (629)  (32) (661) (629)  (32) (661)
Non-cash portion  (473)  (473)  (473)  (473)
Adjustments     
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2002 $184 $ $4,532 $4,716  184  4,532 4,716 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Cash payments (77)  (991) (1,068)
Non-cash portion     
Adjustments (107)  1,030 923 
 
 
 
 
 
Reserve balance at April 30, 2003 $ $ $4,571 $4,571 
 
 
 
 
 

     Of the reserve balance at April 30, 2002, $1,061 was included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $3,655 was classified as long-term obligations.

6069


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Of the reserve balances at April 30, 2003 and 2002, $1,485 and $1,061, respectively, were included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $3,086 and $3,655, respectively, were classified as long-term obligations.

13.     Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

We adopted SFAS No. 142“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” effective May 1, 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we discontinued the amortization of our recorded goodwill of $49,422 as of that date, identified our reporting units based on our current segment reporting structure and allocated all recorded goodwill, as well as other assets and liabilities, to the reporting units. We concluded that our reporting units are the same as our operating segments. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill attributable to each of our reporting units is required to be tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value. As of May 1, 2002, this evaluation indicated that the fair value for each of our reporting units exceeded the reporting unit’s carrying amount and no impairment was recognized. On an ongoing basis, goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment (or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise). As of April 30, 2003, there had been no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. There can be no assurance that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.

     In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, we also reassessed the useful lives and the classification of our purchased intangible assets and determined that they continued to be appropriate except for acquired workforce net of deferred tax liabilities of $502, which was reclassified into goodwill.

A reconciliation of our previously reported net income and net income per share to amounts for the exclusion of goodwill amortization net of the related income tax effect follows:

             
Years Ended April 30,
200320022001



(In thousands)
Net income, as reported $76,472  $3,033  $74,886 
Add: Goodwill amortization, including acquired workforce     15,169   9,107 
   
   
   
 
Adjusted net income $76,472  $18,202  $83,993 
   
   
   
 
Basic net income per share, as reported $0.23  $0.01  $0.23 
Goodwill amortization, including acquired workforce     0.04   0.03 
   
   
   
 
Adjusted basic net income per share $0.23  $0.05  $0.26 
   
   
   
 
Diluted net income per share, as reported $0.22  $0.01  $0.21 
Goodwill amortization, including acquired workforce     0.04   0.02 
   
   
   
 
Adjusted diluted net income per share $0.22  $0.05  $0.23 
   
   
   
 

Intangible assets balances are summarized as follows:

                         
April 30, 2003April 30, 2002


GrossAccumulatedNetGrossAccumulatedNet
AssetsAmortizationAssetsAssetsAmortizationAssets






Intangible assets:                        
Existing technology $16,365  $(13,411) $2,954  $17,179  $(8,351) $8,828 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

     Existing technology is amortized over three years and total amortization expense for existing technology was $5,478, $5,726 and $2,625 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively and such amounts were included in cost of product revenue. For fiscal 2004, estimated future amortization expense is $2,954 and none thereafter.

70


(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per-share data)NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

13.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

14.     Guarantees

     As of April 30, 2003, our financial guarantees consisted of standby letters of credit outstanding, bank guarantee, and restricted cash, which were related to facility lease requirements, product performance guarantees, customs and duties guarantees, VAT requirements, and workers’ compensation plans. The maximum amount of potential future payments under these arrangements was $2,630 as of April 30, 2003. Of this maximum exposure, $1,142 of restricted cash was classified under Other Assets on our balance sheet at April 30, 2003. We have not recorded any liability at April 30, 2003 related to these guarantees.

     We provide both recourse and non-recourse lease financing options to our customers. Under the terms of recourse leases, which are generally 3 years or less, we remain liable for the aggregate unpaid remaining lease payments. We defer 100% of the recourse lease obligation and recognize revenue over the term of the lease as the lease payments become due. As of April 30, 2003 the maximum recourse exposure totaled approximately $4,940. Under the terms of the non-recourse leases, we do not have any continuing obligations or liabilities. To date, we have not experienced significant losses under this lease financing program.

     We do not maintain a general warranty reserve for estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized due to our extensive product quality program and processes and because our customer service inventories utilized to correct product failures are carried at zero cost.

     We defend and indemnify our customers for damages and reasonable costs incurred in any suit or claim brought against them alleging that our products sold to our customers infringe any U.S. patent, copyright, trade secret or similar right. If a product becomes the subject of an infringement claim, we may, at our option: (i) replace the product with another non-infringing product that provides substantially similar performance; (ii) modify the infringing product so that it no longer infringes but remains functionally equivalent; (iii) obtain the right for the customer to continue using the product at our expense and for the reseller to continue selling the product; (iv) take back the infringing product and refund to customer the purchase price paid less depreciation amortized on a straight line basis. We have not been required to make material payments pursuant to these provisions historically. We have not identified any losses that are probable under these provisions and, accordingly, we have not recorded a liability related to these indemnification provisions.

15.     Subsequent Events

     On May 13, 2003, we announced that the Board of Directors has approved a $150,000 stock repurchase program to purchase shares of our outstanding common stock. The duration of the repurchase program is open-ended. Under the program, Network Appliance, Inc. could purchase shares of common stock through open market transactions at prices deemed appropriate by management. The timing and amount of repurchase transactions under this program will depend on market conditions and corporate and regulatory considerations. The purchases will be funded from available working capital. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.

16.     Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

                 
Year Ended April 30, 2002

Q1Q2Q3Q4




Total revenues $200,426  $194,715  $198,349  $204,879 
Gross margin  112,349   113,731   123,337   131,106 
Net income (loss)  (513)  (11,211)  6,984   7,773 
Net income (loss) per share, basic  (0.00)  (0.03)  0.02   0.02 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted  (0.00)  (0.03)  0.02   0.02 
                                
Year Ended April 30, 2001Year Ended April 30, 2003


Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4








Total revenues $231,159 $260,777 $288,409 $225,841  $206,828 $215,171 $228,464 $241,605 
Gross margin 141,702 161,463 174,646 126,668  127,715 132,990 138,688 147,033 
Net income 4,976 35,360 34,071 479  16,165 15,813 19,671 24,823 
Net income per share, basic 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.00  0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 
Net income per share, diluted 0.01 0.10 0.09 0.00  0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 

6171


NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

                 
Year Ended April 30, 2002

Q1Q2Q3Q4




Total revenues $200,426  $194,715  $198,349  $204,879 
Gross margin  110,917   112,299   121,905   129,676 
Net income (loss)  (513)  (11,211)  6,984   7,773 
Net income (loss) per share, basic  0.00   (0.03)  0.02   0.02 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted  0.00   (0.03)  0.02   0.02 

72


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureChanges in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of The RegistrantDirectors and Executive Officers of The Registrant

     The information required by this Item with respect to the Company’s executive officers is incorporated herein by reference from the information under Item 1 of Part I of this Report under the section entitled “Executive Officers.” The information required by this Item with respect to the Company’s directors is incorporated herein by reference from the information provided under the heading “Election of Directors” of the Definitive Proxy Statement which will be filed with the Commission. The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the information provided under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Proxy Statement.

Item 11.Executive CompensationExecutive Compensation

     Information regarding the compensation of executive officers and directors of the Company is incorporated by reference from the information under the heading “Executive Compensation and Related Information” in our Proxy Statement.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

     Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the information under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Proxy Statement.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

     Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Agreements” in our Proxy Statement.

PART IV

Item 14.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)(1) Item 14.The following consolidated financial statements of Network Appliance, Inc. are filed as part of this Form 10-K:     Controls and Procedures

     Disclosure Controls are procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

     Based on their evaluation, as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective. There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. However, in May 2003, we implemented new enterprise-wide software, as well as new business processes and procedures to support the software. These changes are the result of our normal business process to evaluate and upgrade or replace our systems software and related business processes to support our evolving operational needs. The new software and processes will be used to record and report our financial results for fiscal 2004.

73


Item 15.     Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a)(1) The following consolidated financial statements of Network Appliance, Inc. are filed as part of this Form 10-K:

Independent Auditors’ Report

Consolidated Balance Sheets — April 30, 20022003 and 20012002

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended April 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended April 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended April 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended April 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

62


(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule.Schedule

     The following financial statement schedule of the Company is filed in Part IV, Item 14(d) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

The following financial statement schedule of the Company is filed in Part IV, Item 14(d) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

     All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3) Exhibits.Exhibits

     
Exhibit
No.Description


 2.1(7)  Agreement and Plan of Merger of Network Appliance, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Network Appliance, Inc. (a California corporation).
 3.1(7)  Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
 3.2(7)  Bylaws of the Company.
 4.1(7)  Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
 10.1(1)*  The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
 10.2(2)*  The Company’s Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.
 10.3(2)  The Company’s Special Non-Officer Stock Option Plan.
 10.4(8)*  The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
 10.5†(3)  OEM Distribution and License Agreement, dated October 27, 1998, by and between Dell Products L.P. and the Company.
 10.6(4)  OEM Distribution and License Agreement, dated November 6, 1998, by and between Fujitsu Limited and the Company.
 10.7(5)10.15†(6) Closing Certificate (Phase IV) and Agreement, dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.8(5)Construction Management Agreement (Phase IV), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.9(5)Purchase Agreement (Phase IV — Land), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.10(5)Pledge Agreement (Phase IV — Land), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.11(5)Lease Agreement (Phase IV — Land), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.12(5)Purchase Agreement (Phase IV — Improvements), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.13(5)Pledge Agreement (Phase IV — Improvements), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.14(5)Lease Agreement (Phase IV — Improvements), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.15†(6) Patent Cross License Agreement dated December 11, 2000, by and between Intel Corporation and the Company.
 10.16(1)*  Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Company and its directors and officers.
 10.1710.17(9)  Short Form Termination of Operative Documents, dated April 24, 2002, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
 21.121.1(9)  Subsidiaries of the Company.
 23.1  Independent Auditors’ Consent.
 24.1  Power of Attorney (see signature page).
99.1Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

74



(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-97864).
 
(2) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated July 23, 1997.

63


(3) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated December 11, 1998.
 
(4) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 11, 1999.
 
(5) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated December 11, 2000.
 
(6) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 12, 2001.
 
(7) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2001.
 
(8) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated November 26, 2001.
(9) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated June 28, 2002.

 Specified portions of this agreement have been omitted and have been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

*Identifies management plan or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.8-K

     WeOn May 13, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K dated November 1, 2001, describing, pursuantrelating to Item 5,financial information for Network Appliance for the completionquarter and year ended April 30, 2003, and forward-looking statements relating to fiscal 2003 and the fourth quarter of our reincorporation into the Statefiscal 2003, as presented in a press release of Delaware.May 13, 2003.

6475


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on June 28, 2002.25, 2003.

 NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

 By: /s/ DANIEL J. WARMENHOVEN
 
 Daniel J. Warmenhoven
 Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Daniel J. Warmenhoven and Jeffry R. Allen,Steven J. Gomo, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

     
SignaturesTitleDate



/s/ DANIEL J. WARMENHOVEN

(Daniel J. Warmenhoven)
 Chief Executive Officer, Director (Principal Executive Officer)June 28, 2002
 
/s/ DONALD T. VALENTINE

(Donald T. Valentine)
Chairman of the Board, DirectorJune 28, 2002
/s/ JEFFRY R. ALLEN

(Jeffry R. Allen)
Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)June 28, 2002
/s/ SANJIV AHUJA

(Sanjiv Ahuja)
DirectorJune 28, 2002
/s/ CAROL A. BARTZ

(Carol A. Bartz)
DirectorJune 28, 2002
/s/ NICHOLAS G. MOORE

(Nicholas G. Moore)
DirectorJune 28, 2002
/s/ MICHAEL R. HALLMAN

(Michael R. Hallman)
DirectorJune 28, 2002

65


SignaturesTitleDate



 
/s/ DANIEL J. WARMENHOVEN

(Daniel J. Warmenhoven)
Chief Executive Officer, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
June 25, 2003
/s/ DONALD T. VALENTINE

(Donald T. Valentine)
Chairman of the Board, DirectorJune 25, 2003
/s/ STEVEN J. GOMO

(Steven J. Gomo)
Senior Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
June 25, 2003
/s/ SANJIV AHUJA

(Sanjiv Ahuja)
DirectorJune 25, 2003
/s/ CAROL A. BARTZ

(Carol A. Bartz)
DirectorJune 25, 2003
/s/ NICHOLAS G. MOORE

(Nicholas G. Moore)
DirectorJune 25, 2003

76


SignaturesTitleDate



/s/ MICHAEL R. HALLMAN

(Michael R. Hallman)
DirectorJune 25, 2003
/s/ ROBERT T. WALL

(Robert T. Wall)
 Director June 28, 200225, 2003
 
/s/ DR. SACHIO SEMMOTO

(Dr. Sachio Semmoto)
 Director June 28, 200225, 2003

6677


SCHEDULE II

NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED APRILYears Ended April 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001 AND 2000
(In thousands)
                                  
Balance atCharged toBalanceBalance atCharged toBalance
BeginningCosts andat End ofBeginningCosts andat End
DescriptionDescriptionof PeriodExpensesDeductionsPeriodDescriptionof PeriodExpensesDeductionsof Period











(In thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts:Allowance for doubtful accounts: Allowance for doubtful accounts: 
2002 $4,030 $7,549 $3,163 $8,416 2003 $8,416 $(1,696) $1,365 $5,355 
2001 3,039 2,443 1,452 4,030 2002 4,030 7,549 3,163 8,416 
2000 1,886 1,275 122 3,039 2001 3,039 2,443 1,452 4,030 

6778


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Daniel J. Warmenhoven, certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Network Appliance Inc. (the “registrant”);

     2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

     6.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ DANIEL J. WARMENHOVEN

Daniel J. Warmenhoven
Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 25, 2003

79


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Steven J. Gomo, certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Network Appliance Inc. (the “registrant”);

     2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

     6.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ STEVEN J. GOMO

Steven J. Gomo
Senior Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 25, 2003

80


EXHIBIT INDEX

     
Exhibit
No.Description


 2.1(7)  Agreement and Plan of Merger of Network Appliance, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Network Appliance, Inc. (a California corporation).
 3.1(7)  Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
 3.2(7)  Bylaws of the Company.
 4.1(7)  Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
 10.1(1)*  The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
 10.2(2)*  The Company’s Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.
 10.3(2)  The Company’s Special Non-Officer Stock Option Plan.
 10.4(8)*  The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
 10.5†(3)  OEM Distribution and License Agreement, dated October 27, 1998, by and between Dell Products L.P. and the Company.
 10.6(4)  OEM Distribution and License Agreement, dated November 6, 1998, by and between Fujitsu Limited and the Company.
 10.7(5)10.15†(6) Closing Certificate (Phase IV) and Agreement, dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.8(5)Construction Management Agreement (Phase IV), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.9(5)Purchase Agreement (Phase IV — Land), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.10(5)Pledge Agreement (Phase IV — Land), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.11(5)Lease Agreement (Phase IV — Land), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.12(5)Purchase Agreement (Phase IV — Improvements), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.13(5)Pledge Agreement (Phase IV — Improvements), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.14(5)Lease Agreement (Phase IV — Improvements), dated October 2, 2000, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
10.15†(6) Patent Cross License Agreement dated December 11, 2000, by and between Intel Corporation and the Company.
 10.16(1)*  Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Company and its directors and officers.
 10.1710.17(9)  Short Form Termination of Operative Documents, dated April 24, 2002, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
 21.121.1(9)  Subsidiaries of the Company.
 23.1  Independent Auditors’ Consent.
 24.1  Power of Attorney (see signature page).
99.1Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-97864).
 
(2) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated July 23, 1997.
 
(3) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated December 11, 1998.
 
(4) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 11, 1999.
 
(5) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated December 11, 2000.
 
(6) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 12, 2001.
 
(7) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2001.
 
(8) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated November 26, 2001.
(9) Previously filed as an exhibit with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated June 28, 2002.

 Specified portions of this agreement have been omitted and have been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

68
*Identifies management plan or compensatory plan or arrangement.