UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
 
þ  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 20082009
OR
 
o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from          to          
 
Commission File Number 1-368-2
Chevron Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware 94-0890210 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road,
San Ramon, California 94583-2324
  
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code(925) 842-1000
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
   

Title of Each Class
 Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
Common stock, par value $.75 per share
 
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ          No o
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o          No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ          No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes þ          No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
       
Large accelerated filer þ
 Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes o       No þ
 
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter — $203,659,751,369$132,865,210,015 (As of June 30, 2008)2009)
 
Number of Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 20, 200919, 2010 — 2,004,559,2792,008,352,638
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(To The Extent Indicated Herein)
 
Notice of the 20092010 Annual Meeting and 20092010 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant toRule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in connection with the company’s 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (in Part III)
 
 


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
              
Item
Item
   Page No.
Item
   Page No.
  3   3 
   3    3 
   4    4 
  
 4   
 4 
  
 4   
 4 
  
 5   
 5 
  
 6   
 6 
  
 6   
 6 
  
 6   
 6 
  
 7   
 7 
  
 8   
 8 
  
 8   
 8 
  
 9   
 9 
  
 9   
 9 
  
 23   
 23 
  
 24   
 24 
  
 24   
 24 
  
 25   
 25 
  
 25   
 25 
  
 26   
 26 
  
 27   
 28 
  
 28   
 28 
  
 28   
 28 
  
 28   
 29 
  
 29   
 29 
  
 29   
 29 
  
 29   
 29 
  
 29   
 30 
  30   30 
  31   32 
  31   32 
  31   32 
  32   33 
PART II
  33   34 
  33   34 
  33   34 
  33   34 
  33   34 
  34   35 
  34   35 
   34    35 
   34    35 
   34    35 
  34   35 
PART III
  35   36 
  36   37 
  36   37 
  36   37 
  36   37 
PART IV
  37   38 
   38    38 
   39    39 
EX-4.2
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-10.3
EX-10.5
EX-10.6
EX-10.7
EX-10.13
EX-10.15 EX-10.15
EX-10.16 EX-10.16
EX-10.17 EX-10.17
EX-10.19 EX-10.19 EX-10.19
EX-10.20 EX-10.20
EX-12.1 EX-12.1 EX-12.1
EX-21.1 EX-21.1 EX-21.1
EX-23.1 EX-23.1 EX-23.1
EX-24.1 EX-24.1 EX-24.1
EX-24.2
EX-24.1 EX-24.1
EX-24.3 EX-24.3 EX-24.3
EX-24.4 EX-24.4 EX-24.4
EX-24.5 EX-24.5 EX-24.5
EX-24.6 EX-24.6 EX-24.6
EX-24.7 EX-24.7 EX-24.7
EX-24.8 EX-24.8 EX-24.8
EX-24.9 EX-24.9 EX-24.9
EX-24.10 EX-24.10 EX-24.10
EX-24.11 EX-24.11 EX-24.11
EX-24.12 EX-24.12 EX-24.12
EX-24.13
EX-31.1 EX-31.1 EX-31.1
EX-31.2 EX-31.2 EX-31.2
EX-32.1 EX-32.1 EX-32.1
EX-32.2 EX-32.2 EX-32.2
EX-99.1 EX-99.1 EX-99.1
INSTANCE DOCUMENT
SCHEMA DOCUMENT
CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT


1


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT RELEVANT TO FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
FOR THE PURPOSE OF “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
 
ThisAnnual Report onForm 10-Kof Chevron Corporation contains forward-looking statements relating to Chevron’s operations that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the petroleum, chemicals and other energy-related industries. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “schedules,” “estimates,” “budgets” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the company’s control and are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Unless legally required, Chevron undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements areare: changing crude-oil and natural-gas prices; changing refining, marketing and chemical margins; actions of competitors or regulators; timing of exploration expenses; timing of crude-oil liftings; the competitiveness ofalternate-energy sources or product substitutes; technological developments; the results of operations and financial condition of equity affiliates; the inability or failure of the company’s joint-venture partners to fund their share of operations and development activities; the potential failure to achieve expected net production from existing and future crude-oil and natural-gas development projects; potential delays in the development, construction orstart-up of planned projects; the potential disruption or interruption of the company’s net production or manufacturing facilities or delivery/transportation networks due to war, accidents, political events, civil unrest, severe weather or crude-oil production quotas that might be imposed by OPEC (Organizationthe Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries);Countries; the potential liability for remedial actions or assessments under existing or future environmental regulations and litigation; significant investment or product changes under existing or future environmental statutes, regulations and litigation; the potential liability resulting from other pending or future litigation; the company’s future acquisition or disposition of assets;assets and gains and losses from asset dispositions or impairments; government-mandated sales, divestitures, recapitalizations, industry-specific taxes, changes in fiscal terms or restrictions on scope of company operations; foreign currencyforeign-currency movements compared with the U.S. dollar; the effects of changed accounting rules under generally accepted accounting principles promulgated byrule-setting bodies; and the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” on pages 30 and 31through 32 in this report. In addition, such statements could be affected by general domestic and international economic and political conditions. Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed in this report could also have material adverse effects onforward-looking statements.


2


 
PART I
 
Item 1.  Business
 
(a)  General Development of Business
 
Summary Description of Chevron
 
Chevron Corporation,1* a Delaware corporation, manages its investments in subsidiaries and affiliates and provides administrative, financial, management and technology support to U.S. and international subsidiaries that engage in fully integrated petroleum operations, chemicals operations, mining operations, power generation and energy services. Exploration and production (upstream) operations consist of exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas and also marketing natural gas. Refining, marketing and transportation (downstream) operations relate to refining crude oil and converting natural gas into finished petroleum products; marketing crude oil and the many products derived from petroleum; and transporting crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products by pipeline, marine vessel, motor equipment and rail car. ChemicalChemicals operations include the manufacture and marketing of commodity petrochemicals, plastics for industrial uses, and fuel and lubricant oil additives.
 
A list of the company’s major subsidiaries is presented on pagesE-125E-23 andE-126.E-24. As of December 31, 2008,2009, Chevron had approximately 67,000 employees (including about 5,000 service station employees). Approximately 32,00064,000 employees (including about 4,000 service station employees). Approximately 31,500 employees (including about 3,500 service station employees), or 4849 percent, were employed in U.S. operations.
 
Overview of Petroleum Industry
 
Petroleum industry operations and profitability are influenced by many factors, and individual petroleum companies have little control over some of them. Governmental policies, particularly in the areas of taxation, energy and the environment, have a significant impact on petroleum activities, regulating how companies are structured and where and how companies conduct their operations and formulate their products and, in some cases, limiting their profits directly. Prices for crude oil, and natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals are generally determined by supply and demand for these commodities. However, some governments impose price controls on refined products such as gasoline or diesel fuel. The members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) are typically the world’s swing producers of crude oil, and their production levels are a major factor in determining worldwide supply. Demand for crude oil and its products and for natural gas is largely driven by the conditions of local, national and global economies, although weather patterns and taxation relative to other energy sources also play a significant part. Seasonality is not a primary driver toof changes in the company’s quarterly earnings during the year.
 
Strong competition exists in all sectors of the petroleum and petrochemical industries in supplying the energy, fuel and chemical needs of industry and individual consumers. Chevron competes with fully integrated major global petroleum companies, as well as independent and national petroleum companies, for the acquisition of crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas leases and other properties and for the equipment and labor required to develop and operate those properties. In its downstream business, Chevron also competes with fully integrated major petroleum companies and other independent refining, marketing and transportation entities and national petroleum companies in the sale or acquisition of various goods or services in many national and international markets.
 
Operating Environment
 
Refer to pages FS-2 through FS-8FS-9 of thisForm 10-K in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the company’s current business environment and outlook.
 
 
1Incorporated in Delaware in 1926 as Standard Oil Company of California, the company adopted the name Chevron Corporation in 1984 and ChevronTexaco Corporation in 2001. In 2005, ChevronTexaco Corporation changed its name to Chevron Corporation. As used in this report, the term “Chevron” and such terms as “the company,” “the corporation,” “our,” “we” and “us” may refer to Chevron Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or all of them taken as a whole, but unless stated otherwise, it does not include “affiliates” of Chevron — i.e., those companies accounted for by the equity method (generally owned 50 percent or less) or investments accounted for by the cost method. All of these terms are used for convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any of the separate companies, each of which manages its own affairs.


3


Chevron Strategic Direction
 
Chevron’s primary objective is to create stockholder value and achieve sustained financial returns from its operations that will enable it to outperform its competitors. AsIn the upstream, the company’s strategies are to grow profitably in core areas, build new legacy positions and commercialize the company’s equity natural-gas resource base while growing a foundation for achieving this objective,high-impact global gas business. In the company has establisheddownstream, the following strategies:
Strategies for Major Businesses
•  Upstream —grow profitably in core areas, build new legacy positions and commercialize the company’s equity natural-gas resource base while growing a high-impact global gas business
•  Downstream —improve returns and selectively grow, with a focus on integrated value creation
strategies are to improve returns and selectively grow, with a focus on integrated value creation. The company also continues to invest in renewable-energy technologies, with an objective of capturing profitable positions.
 
Enabling Strategies Companywide
(b)  •  Invest in peopleto achieve the company’s strategies
•  Leverage technologyto deliver superior performanceDescription of Business and growth
•  Build organizational capabilityPropertiesto deliver world-class performance in operational excellence, cost management, capital stewardship and profitable growth
(b)  Description of Business and Properties
 
The upstream, downstream and chemicals activities of the company and its equity affiliates are widely dispersed geographically, with operations in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Australia. Tabulations of segment sales and other operating revenues, earnings and income taxes for the three years ending December 31, 2008,2009, and assets as of the end of 20082009 and 20072008 — for the United States and the company’s international geographic areas — are in Note 911 to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning onpage FS-38.FS-40. Similar comparative data for the company’s investments in and income from equity affiliates and property, plant and equipment are in Notes 12 and 13 on pages FS-41 to FS-43.FS-43 through FS-45.
 
Capital and Exploratory Expenditures
 
Total expenditures for 2009 were $22.2 billion, including $1.6 billion for the company’s share of equity-affiliate expenditures. In 2008 and 2007, expenditures were $22.8 billion including $2.3 billion for Chevron’s share of expenditures by affiliated companies, which did not require cash outlays by the company. In 2007 and 2006, expenditures were $20 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively, including the company’s share of affiliates’ expenditures of $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion in the correspondingboth periods.
 
Of the $22.8$22.2 billion in expenditures for 2008,2009, about three-fourths, or $17.5$17.1 billion, was related to upstream activities. Approximately the same percentage was also expended for upstream operations in 20072008 and 2006.2007. International upstream accounted for about 7080 percent of the worldwide upstream investment in each of the three years,2009 and about 70 percent in 2008 and 2007, reflecting the company’s continuing focus on opportunities that are available outside the United States.
 
In 2009,2010, the company estimates capital and exploratory expenditures will be $22.8$21.6 billion, including $1.8$1.6 billion of spending by affiliates. About three-fourths80 percent of the total, or $17.5$17.3 billion, is budgeted for exploration and production activities, with $13.9$13.2 billion of that amount for projects outside the United States.
 
Refer also to a discussion of the company’s capital and exploratory expenditures onpage FS-11FS-12. and FS-12.
 
Upstream — Exploration and Production
 
The table on the following page summarizes the net production of liquids and natural gas for 20082009 and 20072008 by the company and its affiliates.


4


 
Net Production of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids and Natural Gas11,2
 
                         
        
Components of Oil-Equivalent
 
     Crude Oil & Natural Gas
    
  Oil-Equivalent (Thousands
  Liquids (Thousands of
  Natural Gas (Millions of
 
  of Barrels per Day)  Barrels per Day)  Cubic Feet per Day) 
  2008  2007  2008  2007  2008  2007 
 
United States:
                        
California  215   221   201   205   88   97 
Gulf of Mexico  160   214   86   118   439   576 
Texas (Onshore)  149   153   76   77   441   457 
Other States  147   155   58   60   533   569 
                         
Total United States  671   743   421   460   1,501   1,699 
                         
Africa:
                        
Angola  154   179   145   171   52   48 
Nigeria  154   129   142   126   72   15 
Chad  29   32   28   31   5   4 
Republic of the Congo  13   8   11   7   12   7 
Democratic Republic of the Congo  2   3   2   3   1   2 
                         
Total Africa  352   351   328   338   142   76 
                         
Asia-Pacific:
                        
Thailand  217   224   67   71   894   916 
Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ)2
  106   112   103   109   20   17 
Australia  96   100   34   39   376   372 
Bangladesh  71   47   2   2   414   275 
Kazakhstan  66   66   41   41   153   149 
Azerbaijan  29   61   28   60   7   5 
Philippines  26   26   5   5   128   126 
China  22   26   19   22   22   22 
Myanmar  15   17         89   100 
                         
Total Asia-Pacific  648   679   299   349   2,103   1,982 
                         
Indonesia
  235   241   182   195   319   277 
Other International:
                        
United Kingdom  106   115   71   78   208   220 
Denmark  61   63   37   41   142   132 
Argentina  44   47   37   39   45   50 
Canada  37   36   36   35   4   5 
Colombia  35   30         209   178 
Trinidad and Tobago  32   29         189   174 
Netherlands  9   4   2   3   40   5 
Norway  6   6   6   6   1   1 
                         
Total Other International  330   330   189   202   838   765 
                         
Total International  1,565   1,601   998   1,084   3,402   3,100 
                         
Total Consolidated Operations  2,236   2,344   1,419   1,544   4,903   4,799 
Equity Affiliates3
  267   248   230   212   222   220 
                         
Total Including Affiliates4
  2,503   2,592   1,649   1,756   5,125   5,019 
                         
                         
1 Excludes Athabasca oil sands
production, net:
   27    27    27    27    —    — 
2 Located between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
                    
3 Volumes represent Chevron’s share of production by affiliates, including Tengizchevroil (TCO) in Kazakhstan and Petroboscan, Petroindependiente and Petropiar/Hamaca in Venezuela.
4 Volumes include natural gas consumed in operations of 520 million and 498 million cubic feet per day in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
                         
      
Components of Oil-Equivalent
      Crude Oil & Natural Gas
    
  Oil-Equivalent (Thousands
 Liquids (Thousands of
 Natural Gas (Millions of
  of Barrels per Day) Barrels per Day) Cubic Feet per Day)
  2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
United States
  717   671   484   421   1,399   1,501 
Africa:
                        
Nigeria  232   154   225   142   48   72 
Angola  150   154   141   145   49   52 
Chad  27   29   26   28   5   5 
Republic of the Congo  21   13   19   11   13   12 
Democratic Republic of the Congo  3   2   3   2   1   1 
                         
Total Africa  433   352   414   328   116   142 
                         
Asia:
                        
Indonesia  243   235   199   182   268   319 
Thailand  198   217   65   67   794   894 
Partitioned Zone (PZ)3
  105   106   101   103   21   20 
Kazakhstan  69   66   42   41   161   153 
Bangladesh  66   71   2   2   387   414 
Azerbaijan  30   29   28   28   10   7 
Philippines  27   26   4   5   137   128 
China  19   22   17   19   16   22 
Myanmar  13   15         76   89 
                         
Total Asia  770   787   458   447   1,870   2,046 
                         
Other:
                        
United Kingdom  110   106   73   71   222   208 
Australia  108   96   35   34   434   376 
Denmark  55   61   35   37   119   142 
Colombia  41   35         245   209 
Argentina  38   44   33   37   27   45 
Trinidad and Tobago  34   32   1      199   189 
Canada  28   37   27   36   4   4 
Netherlands  9   9   2   2   41   40 
Norway  5   6   5   6   1   1 
Brazil  2      2          
                         
Total Other  430   426   213   223   1,292   1,214 
                         
Total Consolidated Operations  2,350   2,236   1,569   1,419   4,677   4,903 
Equity Affiliates4
  328   267   277   230   312   222 
                         
Total Including Affiliates5
  2,678   2,503   1,846   1,649   4,989   5,125 
                         
                         
1 2008 conformed to 2009 geographic presentation.
2 Excludes Athabasca oil sands production, net:
      26       27       26       27       —       — 
3 Located between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
4 Volumes represent Chevron’s share of production by affiliates, including Tengizchevroil (TCO) in Kazakhstan and Petroboscan, Petroindependiente and Petropiar in Venezuela.
5 Volumes include natural gas consumed in operations of 521 million and 520 million cubic feet per day in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Worldwide oil-equivalent production, including volumes from oil sands (refer to footnote 12 above), was 2.532.7 million barrels per day, downup about 37 percent from 2007.2008. The declineincrease was mostly attributable to damages to facilities caused by September 2008 hurricanesassociated with thestart-up of the Blind Faith and Tahiti fields in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in late 2008 and the impactsecond quarter 2009, respectively, the commencement of higher prices on certain production-sharingoperations in the third quarter 2008 at the Agbami Field in Nigeria, and variable-royalty agreements outside the United States.expansion at Tengiz in Kazakhstan. Refer to the “Results of Operations” section beginning onpage FS-6 for a detailed discussion of the factors explaining the 2006 — 20082007-2009 changes in production for crude oil and natural gas liquids, and natural gas.


5


The company estimates that its average worldwide oil-equivalent production in 20092010 will be approximately 2.632.73 million barrels per day. This estimate is subject to many uncertainties, including quotas that may be imposed by OPEC, the price effect on production volumes calculated under cost-recovery and variable-royalty provisions of certain contracts, changes in fiscal terms or restrictions on the scope of company operations, delays in projectstart-ups, fluctuations in demand for natural gas in various markets, and production that may have to be shut in due to weather conditions, civil unrest,


5


changing geopolitics or other disruptions to operations. Future production levels also are affected by the size and number of economic investment opportunities and, for new large-scale projects, the time lag between initial exploration and the beginning of production. Refer to the “Review of Ongoing Exploration and Production Activities in Key Areas,” beginning on page 9, for a discussion of the company’s major oilcrude-oil and gasnatural-gas development projects.
 
Average Sales Prices and Production Costs per Unit of Production
 
Refer to Table IV onpage FS-67FS-69 for the company’s average sales price per barrel of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids and per thousand cubic feet of natural gas produced and the average production cost per oil-equivalent barrel for 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.
 
Gross and Net Productive Wells
 
The following table summarizes gross and net productive wells at year-end 20082009 for the company and its affiliates:
 
Productive Oil and Gas Wells1 at December 31, 20082009
 
                 
  Productive2
  Productive2
 
  Oil Wells  Gas Wells 
  Gross  Net  Gross  Net 
 
United States:                
California  25,726   23,921   188   44 
Gulf of Mexico  1,489   1,214   922   701 
Other U.S.   23,729   8,460   10,587   4,824 
                 
Total United States  50,944   33,595   11,697   5,569 
                 
Africa  2,126   723   17   7 
Asia-Pacific  2,479   1,150   2,468   1,560 
Indonesia  7,879   7,737   203   165 
Other International  1,091   680   275   105 
                 
Total International  13,575   10,290   2,963   1,837 
                 
Total Consolidated Companies  64,519   43,885   14,660   7,406 
Equity in Affiliates  1,174   413   7   2 
                 
Total Including Affiliates  65,693   44,298   14,667   7,408 
                 
Multiple completion wells included above:  881   549   411   318 
                 
  Productive2,3
  Productive2
 
  Oil Wells  Gas Wells 
  Gross  Net  Gross  Net 
 
United States  49,761   32,720   11,567   5,671 
Africa  2,292   766   17   7 
Asia  10,580   9,106   2,336   1,510 
Other  1,605   963   275   74 
                 
Total Consolidated Companies  64,238   43,555   14,195   7,262 
Equity in Affiliates  1,133   403   7   2 
                 
Total Including Affiliates  65,371   43,958   14,202   7,264 
                 
Multiple completion wells included above:  929   596   390   313 
 
1Includes wells producing or capable of producing and injection wells temporarily functioning as producing wells. Wells that produce both oil and gas are classified as oil wells.
2Gross wells include the total number of wells in which the company has an interest. Net wells include wholly owned wells and the sum of the company’s fractional interests in gross wells.
3Canadian synthetic oil is not produced through wells and therefore is not presented in the table above.
 
Reserves
 
Refer to Table V beginning onpage FS-67FS-69 for a tabulation of the company’s proved net oilcrude-oil and gasnatural-gas reserves by geographic area, at the beginning of 20062007 and each year-end from 20062007 through 2008,2009, and an accompanying discussion of major changes to proved reserves by geographic area for the three-year period ending December 31, 2008.2009. During 2008,2009, the company provided oilcrude-oil and gasnatural-gas reserves estimates for 20072008 to the Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA), that agree with the 20072008 reserve volumes in Table V. This reporting fulfilled the requirement that such estimates are to be consistent with, and do not differ more than 5 percent from, the information furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the company’s 20072008 Annual Report onForm 10-K. During 2009,2010, the company will file estimates of oilcrude-oil and gasnatural-gas reserves with the Department of Energy, EIA, consistent with the 20082009 reserve data reported in Table V.


6


The net proved-reserve balances at the end of each of the three years 20062007 through 20082009 are shown in the table below:
 
Net Proved Reserves at December 31
 
                        
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
Liquids* — Millions of barrels                        
Consolidated Companies  4,735   4,665   5,294   4,610   4,735   4,665 
Affiliated Companies  2,615   2,422   2,512   2,363   2,615   2,422 
Natural Gas — Billions of cubic feet                        
Consolidated Companies  19,022   19,137   19,910   22,153   19,022   19,137 
Affiliated Companies  4,053   3,003   2,974   3,896   4,053   3,003 
Total Oil-Equivalent — Millions of barrels                        
Consolidated Companies  7,905   7,855   8,612   8,303   7,905   7,855 
Affiliated Companies  3,291   2,922   3,008   3,012   3,291   2,922 
 
*Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids. 2009 liquids amount for consolidated companies includes 460 million barrels of synthetic oil produced from oil sands mining operations in Canada in accordance with the adoption of the new SEC definition of oil and gas producing activity.
 
Acreage
 
At December 31, 2008,2009, the company owned or had under lease or similar agreements undeveloped and developed oilcrude-oil and gasnatural-gas properties located throughout the world. The geographical distribution of the company’s acreage is shown in the following table.
 
Acreage11,2 at December 31, 20082009
(Thousands of Acres)
 
                         
        Developed and
 
  Undeveloped2  Developed2  Undeveloped 
  Gross  Net  Gross  Net  Gross  Net 
 
United States:                        
California  138   122   183   176   321   298 
Gulf of Mexico  2,108   1,500   1,568   1,141   3,676   2,641 
Other U.S.   3,441   2,784   4,461   2,497   7,902   5,281 
                         
Total United States  5,687   4,406   6,212   3,814   11,899   8,220 
                         
Africa  17,686   7,710   2,487   921   20,173   8,631 
Asia-Pacific  45,429   22,447   5,937   2,649   51,366   25,096 
Indonesia  8,031   5,348   383   341   8,414   5,689 
Other International  35,236   19,957   1,924   613   37,160   20,570 
                         
Total International  106,382   55,462   10,731   4,524   117,113   59,986 
                         
Total Consolidated Companies  112,069   59,868   16,943   8,338   129,012   68,206 
Equity in Affiliates  640   300   259   104   899   404 
                         
Total Including Affiliates  112,709   60,168   17,202   8,442   129,911   68,610 
                         
                         
        Developed and
 
  Undeveloped3  Developed3  Undeveloped 
  Gross  Net  Gross  Net  Gross  Net 
 
United States  4,679   3,708   6,139   3,769   10,818   7,477 
Africa  9,663   5,705   2,499   917   12,162   6,622 
Asia  38,370   18,491   5,313   2,742   43,683   21,233 
Other  53,181   26,407   3,243   792   56,424   27,199 
                         
Total Consolidated Companies  105,893   54,311   17,194   8,220   123,087   62,531 
Equity in Affiliates  640   300   259   104   899   404 
                         
Total Including Affiliates  106,533   54,611   17,453   8,324   123,986   62,935 
                         
 
1Gross acreage includes the total number of acres in all tracts in which the company has an interest. Net acreage includes wholly owned interests and the sum of the company’s fractional interests in gross acreage.
2Table does not include mining acreage associated with the synthetic oil production in Canada. At year-end 2009, undeveloped gross and net acreage totaled 235 and 31, respectively. Developed gross and net acreage totaled 35 and 7, respectively. Developed acreage is acreage associated with productive mines. Undeveloped acreage is acreage on which mines have not been established and that may contain undeveloped proved reserves.
3Developed acreage is spaced or assignable to productive wells. Undeveloped acreage is acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to permit commercial production and that may contain undeveloped proved reserves. The gross undeveloped acres that will expire in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 20112012 if production is not established by certain required dates are 5,707, 8,29013,526, 9,784 and 4,720,3,662, respectively.


7


 
Delivery Commitments
 
The company sells crude oil and natural gas from its producing operations under a variety of contractual obligations. Most contracts generally commit the company to sell quantities based on production from specified properties, but some natural gasnatural-gas sales contracts specify delivery of fixed and determinable quantities, as discussed below.
 
In the United States, the company is contractually committedhas no fixed and determinable delivery commitments to deliver to third parties and affiliates 414 billion cubic feet of natural gas through 2011. The company believes it can satisfy these contracts from quantities available from production of the company’s proved developed U.S. reserves. These contracts include a variety of pricing terms, including both index and fixed-price contracts.third-parties or affiliates.
 
Outside the United States, the company is contractually committed to deliver to third parties a total of 865821 billion cubic feet of natural gas from 20092010 through 20112012 from Argentina, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Denmark and the Philippines. The sales contracts contain variable pricing formulas that are generally referenced to the prevailing market price for crude oil, natural gas or other petroleum products at the time of delivery. The company believes it can satisfy these contracts from quantities available from production of the company’s proved developed reserves in Argentina, Australia, Colombia, Denmark and the Philippines. The company plans to meet its Canadian contractual delivery commitments of 28 billion cubic feet through third-party purchases.
 
Development Activities
 
Refer to Table I onpage FS-62FS-64 for details associated with the company’s development expenditures and costs of proved property acquisitions for 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.
 
The table below summarizes the company’s net interest in productive and dry development wells completed in each of the past three years and the status of the company’s development wells drilling at December 31, 2008.2009. A “development well” is a well drilled within the proved area of a crude oilcrude-oil or natural gasnatural-gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
 
Development Well Activity
 
                                 
  Wells Drilling
  Net Wells Completed1 
  at 12/31/082  2008  2007  2006 
  Gross  Net  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry 
 
United States:                                
California  8   1   533      620      600    
Gulf of Mexico  44   25   26   3   30   1   34   5 
Other U.S.   9   8   287   1   225   4   317   6 
                                 
Total United States  61   34   846   4   875   5   951   11 
                                 
Africa  13   8   33      43      45   2 
Asia-Pacific  13   4   203   1   223      235   1 
Indonesia  2   2   462      374      258    
Other International  7   2   41      52      43    
                                 
Total International  35   16   739   1   692      581   3 
                                 
Total Consolidated Companies  96   50   1,585   5   1,567   5   1,532   14 
Equity in Affiliates  2   1   16      3      13    
                                 
Total Including Affiliates  98   51   1,601   5   1,570   5   1,545   14 
                                 
                                 
  Wells Drilling
  Net Wells Completed1,2 
  at 12/31/093  2009  2008  2007 
  Gross  Net  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry 
 
United States  47   22   582   3   846   4   875   5 
Africa  6   2   40      33      43    
Asia  38   22   580      665   1   597    
Other  11   4   43      41      52    
                                 
Total Consolidated Companies  102   50   1,245   3   1,585   5   1,567   5 
Equity in Affiliates  1      6      16      3    
                                 
Total Including Affiliates  103   50   1,251   3   1,601   5   1,570   5 
                                 
 
12008 and 2007 conformed to 2009 geographic presentation.
2Indicates the fractional number of wells completed during the year, regardless of when drilling was initiated. Completion refers to the installation of permanent equipment for the production of crude oil or natural gas or, in the case of a dry well, the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.
23Represents wells in the process of drilling, including wells for which drilling was not completed and which were temporarily suspended at the end of 2008.2009. Gross wells include the total number of wells in which the company has an interest. Net wells include wholly owned wells and the sum of the company’s fractional interests in gross wells.


8


 
Exploration Activities
 
The following table summarizes the company’s net interests in productive and dry exploratory wells completed in each of the last three years and the number of exploratory wells drilling at December 31, 2008.2009. “Exploratory wells” are wells drilled to find and produce crude oil or natural gas in unproved areas and include delineation wells, which are wells drilled to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of crude oil or natural gas in another reservoir or to extend a known reservoir beyond the proved area.
 
Exploratory Well Activity
 
                                 
  Wells Drilling
  Net Wells Completed1,2 
  at 12/31/083  2008  2007  2006 
  Gross  Net  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry 
 
United States:                                
California                        
Gulf of Mexico  9   3   8   1   4   7   9   8 
Other U.S.            1      1   7    
                                 
Total United States  9   3   8   2   4   8   16   8 
                                 
Africa  8   3   2   1   6   2   1    
Asia-Pacific  4   2   10   1   14   9   18   7 
Indonesia        4   1   1      2    
Other International  2      39   2   41   6   6   3 
                                 
Total International  14   5   55   5   62   17   27   10 
                                 
Total Consolidated Companies  23   8   63   7   66   25   43   18 
Equity in Affiliates                    1    
                                 
Total Including Affiliates  23   8   63   7   66   25   44   18 
                                 
                                 
  Wells Drilling
  Net Wells Completed1,2 
  at 12/31/093  2009  2008  2007 
  Gross  Net  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry  Prod.  Dry 
 
United States  3   1   4   5   8   2   4   8 
Africa  6   2   2   1   2   1   6   2 
Asia  1      9   1   9   2   13   9 
Other  4   3   5   4   44   2   43   6 
                                 
Total Consolidated Companies  14   6   20   11   63   7   66   25 
Equity in Affiliates                        
                                 
Total Including Affiliates  14   6   20   11   63   7   66   25 
                                 
 
12008 and 2007 conformed to 20082009 geographic presentation.
2Indicates the fractional number of wells completed during the year, regardless of when drilling was initiated. Completion refers to the installation of permanent equipment for the production of crude oil or natural gas or, in the case of a dry well, the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency. Some exploratory wells are not drilled with the intention of producing from the well bore. In such cases, “completion” refers to the completion of drilling. Further categorization of productive or dry is based on the determination as to whether hydrocarbons in a sufficient quantity were found to justify completion as a producing well, whether or not the well is actually going to be completed as a producer.
3Represents wells that are in the process of drilling but have been neither abandoned nor completed as of the last day of the year, including wells for which drilling was not completed and which were temporarily suspended at the end of 2008. Does not include wells for which drilling was completed at year-end 2008 and that were reported as suspended wells in Note 20 beginning onpage FS-48.2009. Gross wells include the total number of wells in which the company has an interest. Net wells include wholly owned wells and the sum of the company’s fractional interests in gross wells.
 
Refer to Table I onpage FS-62FS-64 for detail of the company’s exploration expenditures and costs of unproved property acquisitions for 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.
 
Review of Ongoing Exploration and Production Activities in Key Areas
 
Chevron’s 20082009 key upstream activities, some of which are also discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations beginning onpage FS-2, are presented below. The comments include references to “total production” and “net production,” which are defined under “Production” in Exhibit 99.1 onpage E-146.E-42.
 
The discussion that follows references the status of proved reserves recognition for significant long-lead-time projects not yet on production and for projects recently placed on production. Reserves are not discussed for recent discoveries that have yet to advance to a project stage or for mature areas of production that do not have individual projects requiring significant levels of capital or exploratory investment. Amounts indicated for project costs represent total project costs, not the company’s share of costs for projects that are less than wholly owned.


9


Consolidated Operations
     
     
Chevron has production and exploration activities in most of the world’s major hydrocarbon basins. The company’s upstream strategy is to grow profitably in core areas, build new legacy positions and commercialize the company’s equity natural-gas resource base while growing a high-impact global gas business. The map at left indicates Chevron’s primary areas of production and exploration.
 
a)  United States
 
Upstream activities in the United States are concentrated in California, the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, the Rocky Mountains and Alaska. Average net oil-equivalent production in the United States during 20082009 was 671,000717,000 barrels per day.
In California, the company has significant production in the San Joaquin Valley. In 2009, average net oil-equivalent production was 211,000 barrels per day, composed of 421,000191,000 barrels of crude oil, and natural gas liquids and 1.5 billion91 million cubic feet of natural gas. Refer to Table V beginning onpage FS-67 for a discussiongas and 5,000 barrels of natural gas liquids. Approximately 84 percent of the crude-oil production is considered heavy oil (typically with API gravity lower than 22 degrees).
Average net proved reserves and different hydrocarbon characteristicsoil-equivalent production during 2009 for the company’s major U.S. producing areas.combined interests in the Gulf of Mexico shelf and deepwater areas, and the onshore fields in the region was 243,000 barrels per day. The daily oil-equivalent production comprised 149,000 barrels of crude oil, 484 million cubic feet of natural gas and 14,000 barrels of natural gas liquids.
 
     
California: The company has significant production in the San Joaquin Valley. In 2008, average net oil-equivalent production was 215,000 barrels per day, composed of 196,000 barrels of crude oil, 88 million cubic feet of natural gas and 5,000 barrels of natural gas liquids. Approximately 84 percent of the crude-oil production is considered heavy oil (typically with API gravity lower than 22 degrees).
     
     During 2009, Chevron was engaged in various development and exploration activities in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico: Average net oil-equivalent production during 2008 for the company’s combined interestsMexico. The 75 percent-owned and operated Blind Faith development, which achieved first oil in the Gulffourth quarter 2008, reached maximum total production of Mexico shelf and deepwater areas, and the onshore fields in the region was 160,000 barrels per day. The daily oil-equivalent production comprised 76,000 barrels of crude oil, 439 million cubic feet of natural gas and 10,000 barrels of natural gas liquids.

Production levels in 2008 were adversely affected by damage to facilities caused by hurricanes Gustav and Ike in September. At the end of 2008, approximately 50,00070,000 barrels per day of oil-equivalent in 2009. Blind Faith has an estimated production remained offline,life of 20 years.

At the 58 percent-owned and operated Tahiti Field, first oil was achieved in the second quarter 2009. Maximum total production of 135,000 barrels per day of oil-equivalent was achieved in the third quarter 2009. A second development phase is under evaluation, including additional development drilling and a probable waterflood, with restoration of the volumes to occur as repairs to third-party pipelines and producing facilities are completed.a final investment decision planned formid-2010. The waterflood includes water injection topsides


10


During 2008, Chevron was engaged in various developmentequipment, subsea equipment and exploration activities in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Productionstart-up occurred in fourth quarter 2008 at the 75 percent-owned and operated Blind Faith project. The project was designed for daily production capacity of 65,000 barrels of crude oil and 55 million cubic feet of natural gas from subsea wells tied back to a semisubmersible hull. Proved undeveloped reserves were initially recorded in 2005, and a portion was transferred to the proved-developed category in 2008 coincident with projectstart-up. Thewater injection wells. Tahiti has an estimated production life of 30 years. As of the field is estimated to be approximately 20 years.
At Caesar/Tonga, the company participated in a successful appraisal well in 2008. The Tonga and Caesar partnerships have formed a unit agreementend of 2009, proved reserves had been recognized for the area, with Chevron having a 20 percent nonoperated working interest. First oil is expected by 2011. Development plans include a subsea tie-back to a nearby third-party production facility.first development phase of the Tahiti Field.
 
The company is also participating in the ultra-deepultra-deepwater Perdido Regional Development. The project encompasses the installation of a producing host facility to service multiple fields, including Chevron’s 3333.3 percent-owned Great White, 60 percent-owned Silvertip and 5857.5 percent-owned Tobago. Chevron has a 3837.5 percent interest in the Perdido Regional Host. All of these fields and the production facility are partner-operated. Activities during 20082009 included installation of the topsides on the spar, installation of umbilicals,hook-up and commissioning of the facility construction,systems, and ongoing development drilling and spar installation.drilling. First oil is expected in earlythe first half of 2010, with the facility capable of handlingdesigned to handle 130,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day. The project has an expected life of approximately 25 years. Proved undeveloped reserves related tohave been recognized for the project were first recorded in 2006, and the phased reclassification of these reserves to the proved-developed category is anticipated near the time of productionstart-up.project.


10


At the 58The company has a 60 percent-owned and operated Tahiti Field, development work continued following a delayinterest in 2007 due to metallurgical problems with the facility’s mooring shackles, which problemsBig Foot. Two successful appraisal wells have been resolved.drilled, the most recent in the first quarter 2009. The company also acquired the rights to an adjacent block during 2009. The project entered front-end engineering and design (FEED) in October 2009 and a final investment decision is designed asexpected in late 2010. Total maximum production from the project is expected to be 63,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day. At the end of 2009, proved reserves had not been recognized.
The Caesar and Tonga partnerships for properties located in a number of blocks in the Green Canyon area have formed a unit agreement for the area, with Chevron having a 20.3 percent nonoperated working interest. A final investment decision on the joint Caesar-Tonga project was made in the first quarter 2009. Development plans include four wells and a subsea development, with the wells tied backtie-back to a truss-spar floatingnearby third-party production facility. ProductionTwo development sidetracks were completed during the year. Proved reserves have been recognized for the project and first oil is expected in 2011.
The Jack and St. Malo fields are located within 25 miles of each other and are being considered for joint development. Chevron has a 50 percent-owned interest in Jack and a 51 percent-owned interest in St. Malo, following the anticipated acquisition of an additional 9.8 percent equity interest in St. Malo in March 2010. Both fields are company operated. The project entered FEED in May 2009 and a final investment decision is expected in late 2010. The facility is planned to have an initial design capacity of 150,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day andstart-up is expected in mid-2009. Initial booking2014. At the end of 2009, proved undeveloped reserves occurred in 2003 for the project, with the transfer of a portion of these reserves into the proved-developed category anticipated near the time of productionstart-up. With an estimated production life of 30 years, Tahiti is designed to have a maximum total daily production of 125,000 barrels of crude oil and 70 million cubic feet of natural gas. In early 2009, a possible second phase of field development was under evaluation.had not been recognized.
 
Deepwater exploration activities in 20082009 and early 20092010 included participation in 1210 exploratory wells — fourfive wildcat, three appraisal and eight appraisal.two delineation. Exploratory work included the following:
 
 •  Big Foot — 60 percent-owned and operated. A successful appraisal well was completed in first quarter 2008. A final appraisal well began drilling in November 2008, and was completed in January 2009. As of late February 2009, evaluation of the drilling results was under way.
•  Buckskin — 55 percent-owned and operated. A successful wildcat discovery was announced in February 2009. The first appraisal well was completedis scheduled to begin drilling in early 2009.
•  Jack & St. Malo — 50 percent- and 41 percent-owned and operated interests, respectively. The prospects are being evaluated together due to their relative proximity. Successful appraisal wells were drilled during 2008 at both Jack and St. Malo, bringing the total wells drilled to three at Jack and four at St. Malo.second quarter 2010.
 
 •  Knotty Head — 25 percent-owned andpercent nonoperated working interest. Subsurface studies continued during 2008The first appraisal well began drilling in October 2009 at this 2005 discovery, with an appraisal well planned for third quarter 2009.discovery.
 
 •  Puma — 22 percent-owned and21.8 percent nonoperated working interest. An appraisal well begancompleted drilling in late 2008 and was scheduled for completionearly 2009. Leases were relinquished in second quarter 2009.mid-2009.
 
 •  Tubular Bells — 30 percent-owned andpercent nonoperated working interest. An appraisal well was completed in 2008.Studies to screen and evaluate future development alternatives were continuing at the end of 2009.
 
At the end of 2008,2009, the company had not yet recognized proved reserves for any of the exploration projects discussed above.
 
Besides the activities connected with the development and exploration projects in the Gulf of Mexico, the company also has access to liquefied natural gas (LNG) for the North America natural gas market through the Sabine Pass LNG terminal in Louisiana. The terminal was completed in mid-2008, and Chevron has contracted forcapacity of 1 billion cubic feet per day of regasification capacity at the facility beginningthird-party Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification terminal in Louisiana. The20-year capacity reservation agreement became effective in July 2009. The company also has completed2009 and enables import of natural gas for the permitting processNorth America market. In September 2009, Chevron began to developutilize a portion of the Casotte Landing regasification facility adjacent to the company’s Pascagoula refinery in Mississippi. Casotte Landing remains a development option for Chevron to bring LNG into the United States.reserved capacity under this agreement.
 
Also in the Sabine Pass area of Louisiana, the company has a binding agreement to be one of the anchor shippers in a 3.2 billion-cubic-feet-per-day third-party-owned natural gas pipeline. Chevron has also contracted to have 1.6 billion cubic


11


feet per day of capacity in a third-party pipeline system connecting the Sabine Pass LNG terminal to the natural-gas pipeline of which 1 billion cubic feet per day is in a new pipeline and 600 million cubic feet per day is interconnecting capacity to an existing pipeline.grid. The new pipeline, system, expectedwhich was placed in service in July 2009, provides access to two major salt dome storage fields and 10 major interstate pipeline systems, including an interconnect with Chevron’s Sabine Pipeline, which connects to the Henry Hub. An interconnect to Chevron’s Bridgeline Pipeline is scheduled to be completed in secondthe third quarter 2009, will provide access to Chevron’s Sabine and Bridgeline pipelines, which connect to the Henry Hub.2010. The Henry Hub interconnects to nine interstate and four intrastate pipelines and is the pricing point for natural gas futures contracts traded on the NYMEX (NewNew York Mercantile Exchange).Exchange.
 
Other U.S. Areas:Outside California and the Gulf of Mexico, the company manages operations across the mid-continental United States and Alaska. During 2008,2009, the company’s U.S. production outside California and the Gulf of Mexico averaged 296,000263,000 net oil-equivalent barrels per day, composed of 101,00094,000 barrels of crude oil, 974824 million cubic feet of natural gas and 33,00031,000 barrels of natural gas liquids.
 
In the Piceance Basin in northwestern Colorado, additional production came on line in September 2009 from the company is continuing acompany’s 100 percent-owned and operated natural-gas developmentdevelopment. Development drilling, which began in which it holds a 100 percent operated working interest. A pipeline2007, surpassed 190 wells in 2009, with 81 completed wells available to transport thesupply natural gas to a gathering systemthe central processing facility. Construction of compression and dehydration facilities to produce 65 million cubic feet per day of natural gas was completed in 2008 and facilities to produce 60 million cubic feet of natural gas per day arethe third quarter 2009. Future work is expected to be completed in mid-2009. Developmentmultiple stages. The full development plan includes drilling began in 2007, and reserves will be recognizedmore than 2,000 wells from multi-well pads over the lifenext 30 to 40 years. Proved reserves for subsequent stages of the project based upon drilling results.had not been recognized at year-end 2009.


11


b)  Africa
b)  Africa
 
In Africa, the company is engaged in exploration and production activities in Angola, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Libya, Nigeria and Republic of the Congo. Net oil-equivalent production in Africa averaged 433,000 barrels per day during 2009.
 
     
     
Angola:Chevron holds company-operated working interests in offshore Blocks 0 and 14 and nonoperated working interests in offshore Block 2 and the onshore Fina Sonangol Texaco (FST) area. Net production from these operations in 20082009 averaged 154,000150,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day.

The company operates in areas A and B of the 3939.2 percent-owned Block 0, which averaged 109,000105,000 barrels per day of net liquids production in 2008.2009. The Block 0 concession extends through 2030.

Start-upInitial production from the northern portion of the Mafumeira Field in AreaBlock 0 occurred in July 2009, and total maximum crude-oil production of 42,000 barrels per day was achieved in first quarter 2010. Front-end engineering and design (FEED) started in January 2010 on Mafumeira Sul, a project to develop the southern portion of the Mafumeira Field. A of Block 0final investment decision is expected in third quarter 2009, with crude-oil2011. Maximum production ramping up to the expected maximum total of 35,000 barrels per day in 2011.

Two delineation wells were drilled in Area A. One well found commercial quantities of hydrocarbons and was placed into production during the year. The acquisition of seismic data started in late 2008 andfrom Mafumeira Sul is expected to be finalized in 2010.

Also in Area A are three gas management projects that are expected to eliminate routine flaring95,000 barrels of natural gas by injecting excess natural gas into various reservoirs.crude oil per day. At year - -end 2009, no proved reserves had been recognized for this project.
In the Greater Vanza/Longui Area of Block 0, development concept selection was under way and continued into 2010. FEED is planned for 2011. FEED activities continued on the south extension of the N’Dola Field development. At year-end 2009, no proved reserves had been recognized for these projects.
Four gas management projects in Block 0 are expected to eliminate routine flaring of natural gas by injecting excess natural gas into various reservoirs. The Takula gas-processing platform started production in December 2008. TheFlare and Relief Modification Project and the Cabinda Gas Plant isProject entered service in June 2009 and December 2009, respectively. These projects are expected to reduce flaring by up to 60 million cubic feet per day. Work continued on the Nemba Enhanced Secondary Recovery and Flare Reduction Project and the Malongo Flare and Relief Modification Project, which are scheduled forstart-up in the second half offourth quarter 2010 and in 2011, respectively.
Also in Block 0, a successful two-well exploration and appraisal program was completed. The exploration well was completed in March 2009, and the appraisal well was completed in May 2009. The TakulaDrilling began on another exploration well in November 2009 and Malongo Flare and Relief project is scheduled forstart-up in stages beginningwas completed in the second half of 2009 and continuing into 2011. In Area B, development drilling occurred during 2008 at the Nemba and Kokongo fields. Front-end engineering and development (FEED) continued on the South N’Dola field development.first quarter 2010. The results are under evaluation.
 
In the 31 percent-owned Block 14, net production in 20082009 averaged 33,000 barrels of liquids per day. Activities in 2008 included development drilling atday from the Benguela Belize-LobitoBelize — Lobito Tomboco (BBLT) projectdevelopment and the ongoing evaluation of the Negage project.Kuito, Tombua and Landana fields. Development and production rights for the various fields in Block 14 expire between 2027 and 2029.
 
Also in Block 14, developmentDevelopment of the Tombua and Landana fields continued. Installation of producingcontinued in 2009. First production occurred in August 2009 from new production facilities was completedthat were installed in late 2008, with expectedstart-up in the second half2008. Proved developed reserves were recognized at start of 2009. Production from the Landana North reservoirproduction. Development drilling is expected to continue, to utilize the BBLT infrastructure afterstart-up. Thewith maximum total daily production from Tombua and Landana of 100,000 barrels of crude oil per day is expected to occuranticipated in 2011. Proved undeveloped reserves were recognized for Tombua and Landana in 2001 and 2002, respectively. Reclassification from proved undeveloped to proved developed for Landana occurred in 2006 and 2007. Further reclassification is expected between
During 2009, and 2012 as theTombua-Landana facilities and the drilling program are completed.


12


During 2008, in the Lucapa provisional development area of Block 14, exploratory drilling included an appraisal well that was the second successful appraisal of the 2006 Lucapa discovery. Studiesstudies to evaluate development alternatives atfor the Lucapa beganField continued. The project is expected to enter FEED in secondthe fourth quarter 2008.2010. A successful appraisal well was completed in the fourth quarter 2009 in the Malange area. As of the end of 2009, development of the Negage Field was suspended until cooperative arrangements between Angola and Democratic Republic of the Congo could be finalized. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized. Atrecognized for these projects.
The 39.2 percent-owned and operated Malongo Terminal Oil Export project was completed in November 2009. The new export system more than doubled export capacity from the area, which includes Blocks 0 and 14. In the 20 percent-owned Block 2 and the 1616.3 percent-owned FST area,areas, combined production during 20082009 averaged 3,000 barrels of net liquids per day.


12


Refer alsoEquity Affiliate Operations: In addition to page 22the exploration and producing activities in Angola, Chevron has a 36.4 percent ownership interest in the Angola LNG affiliate that began construction in early 2008 of an onshore natural gas liquefaction plant located in Soyo, Angola. The plant is designed to process more than 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. Construction continued on schedule during 2009 with plantstart-up scheduled for a discussion2012. The life of affiliatethe LNG plant is estimated to be in excess of 20 years. Proved reserves have been recognized for the producing operations in Angola.associated with this project.
 
Angola-RepublicAngola — Republic of the Congo Joint Development Area: Chevron operates and holds a 3131.3 percent interest in the Lianzi Development Area located between Angola and Republic of the Congo. In 2006, the development of the Lianzi area was approved by a committee of representatives from the two countries, and a conceptual field development plan was also submitted to this committee. In late 2008, the development project entered FEED, and further development planning is scheduled inwhich continued through 2009. No proved reserves have been recognized for Lianzi.
 
Republic of the Congo: Chevron has a 3231.5 percent nonoperated working interest in the Nkossa, Nsoko and Moho-Bilondo exploitation permits and a 2929.3 percent nonoperated working interest in the Kitina exploitation permit, all of which are offshore. The development and production rights for Nkossa, Nsoko and Kitina expire in 2027, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Net production from the Republic of the Congo fields averaged 13,00021,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day in 2008.2009.
 
Production atIn May 2009, a successful exploration well was drilled in the Moho-Bilondo exploitation permit area. Development alternatives were being evaluated during 2009. The Moho-Bilondo subsea development project, which started production in April 2008. Maximum2008, is expected to achieve maximum total production of 90,000 barrels of crude oil per day is expected in 2010. Proved undeveloped reserves were initially recognized in 2001. Transfer to the proved-developed category occurred in 2008.third quarter 2010. Chevron’s development and production rights for Moho-Bilondo expire in 2030. One appraisal well was drilled
Democratic Republic of the Congo: Chevron has a 17.7 percent nonoperated working interest in the Moho-Bilondo permit area during 2008. Drilling began on an exploration welloffshore concession. Daily net production in early 2009.2009 averaged 3,000 barrels of oil-equivalent.
 
Chad/Cameroon: Chevron participates in a project to develop crude-oil fields in southern Chad and transport the produced volumes by pipeline to the coast of Cameroon for export. Chevron has a 25 percent nonoperated working interest in the producing operations and aan approximate 21 percent interest in two affiliates that own the pipeline.
Average daily net production from the Chad fields in 20082009 was 29,00027,000 barrels of oil-equivalent. In late 2008, the development application forSeptember 2009, first production was achieved at the Timbre Field in the Doba area was approved.area. The Chad producing operations are conducted under a concession that expires in 2030. Partners relinquished rights to exploration acreage not covered by field-development rights in February 2009.
 
Libya: Chevron isAfter an unsuccessful exploration well was completed, the operator and holds acompany elected to relinquish its 100 percent interest in the onshore Block 177 exploration license. A two-well exploration program is scheduled forlicense in the fourth quarter 2009.
 
     
     
Nigeria:Chevron holds a 40 percent interest in 13 concessions predominantly in the onshore and near-offshore region of the Niger Delta. The company operates under a joint-venture arrangement in this region with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, (NNPC), which owns a 60 percent interest. The company also owns varying interests in deepwater offshore blocks. In 2008,2009, the company’s net oil-equivalent production in Nigeria averaged 154,000232,000 barrels per day, composed of 142,000225,000 barrels of liquids and 7248 million cubic feet of natural gas.

In deepwater offshore, initial production occurred in July 2008 atOil Mining Lease (OML) 127 and OML 128, the 6868.2 percent-owned and operated Agbami Field in OML 127 and OML 128. The project is a subsea design, with wells tied back to a floatingreached maximum total liquids production storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel. By year-end 2008, total crude-oil production was averaging approximately 130,000 barrels per day. Maximum total production of crude oil and natural gas liquids of 250,000 barrels per day in August 2009, following completion of development drilling. In December 2009, a subsequent 10-well development program was initiated and is expected to offset field decline. The leases that contain the Agbami Field expire in 2023 and 2024.

Also in the deepwater area, t he Aparo Field in OML 132 and OML 140 and the Bonga SW Field in offshore OML 118 share a common geologic structure and are planned to be achieved by year-end 2009. The company initially recognized proved undeveloped reserves for Agbamijointly developed under a proposed unitization agreement. Work continued in 2002. A portion of the proved undeveloped reserves was reclassified to proved developed in 2008 at productionstart-up. The total cost for the first phase of2009 on a final unitization agreement between Chevron and


13


this project was $7 billion. Additional development drilling is being evaluated. The leases that contain the Agbami Field expire in 2023 and 2024.
Also in the deepwater area, the Aparo Field in OML 132 and OML 140 and the Bonga SW Field in offshore OML 118 share a common geologic structure and are planned to be jointly developed under a proposed unitization agreement. Work continued in early 2009 on agreements between Chevron and partners in OML 118. At the end of 2008, the company had not recognized2009, no proved reserves were recognized for this project.


13


Chevron operates and holds a 95 percent interest in the deepwater Nsiko discovery on OML 140. Development activities continued in 2008,2009, with FEED expected to commencestart after commercial terms are resolved. At the end of 2008,2009, the company had not recognized proved reserves for this project.
 
The company also holds a 30 percent nonoperated working interest in the deepwater Usan project in OML 138. The development plans involve subsea wells producing to an FPSOa floating production, storage and offloading vessel. Major construction contracts were awardedDevelopment drilling started in 2008, and development drilling is scheduled to begin in the second half ofJune 2009. Productionstart-up is scheduled for 2012. Maximum2012, and maximum total production of 180,000 barrels of crude oil per day is expected to be achieved within one year ofstart-up. The company recognized proved undeveloped reservesTotal costs for the project in 2004, and a portion is expected to be reclassified to the proved-developed category nearare estimated at $8.4 billion. Usan has an estimated productionstart-up. life of 20 years. Proved reserves have been recognized for this project.
 
Chevron participated in threeone successful deepwater exploration wellswell during 2008. Hydrocarbons were confirmed2009 in two wells in OPL 214 and one well in OML 113. Additional reservoir studies are scheduled for 2009, and one exploration well is planned later in the year.Oil Prospecting License (OPL) 223. The company has 20 percent and 18a 30 percent nonoperated working interestsinterest in the two leases, respectively.license. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for these activities.the exploration project.
 
In the Niger Delta, construction is under way on the Phase 3A expansion of the Escravos Gas Plant (EGP), which is expected to be installed was completed in late 2009 and start upof production is expected in March 2010. EGP Phase 3A scope includes offshore natural-gas gathering and compression infrastructure and the addition of a second gasnatural-gas processing facility, which potentially wouldfacility. The modifications are designed to increase processing capacity from 285 million to 680 million cubic feet of natural gas per day and increase LPG and condensate export capacity from 15,000 to 58,000 barrels per day. EGP Phase 3A is designed to process natural gas from the Meji, Delta South, Okan and Mefa fields. Proved undeveloped reserves associated with EGP Phase 3A were recognized in 2002. These reserves are expected to be reclassified to proved developed as various project milestones are reached and related projects are completed. The anticipated life of EGP Phase 3A is 25 years. Phase 3B of the EGP project is designed to gather natural gas from eight offshore fields and to compress and transport natural gas to onshore facilities beginning in 2013.2012. The engineering, procurement, construction, and installation contract for the pipelines was awarded and work commenced in late 2009. Proved reserves have been recognized for these projects.
 
Engineering and procurement activities continued during 2008 for certain onshore fields that had been shut in since 2003 due to civil unrest. The 40 percent-owned and operated Onshore Asset Gas Management project is designed to restore approximately 125 million cubic feet of natural gas per day of natural-gas production from certain onshore fields that have been shut in since 2003 due to civil unrest. Natural gas from these fields is sold in the Nigerian domestic gas market. A majorThe mainon-site construction contract iscontracts are expected to be awarded in the second quarter 2010.
 
Refer to page 23 for a discussion of affiliate operations in Nigeria and to page 25 for a discussion of the plannedgas-to-liquids facility at Escravos.
Equity Affiliate Operations: Chevron holds a 19.5 percent interest in the OKLNG Free Zone Enterprise (OKLNG) affiliate, which will operate the Olokola LNG project. OKLNG plans to build a multi-train natural-gas liquefaction facility and marine terminal located northwest of Escravos. At the end of 2009, timing of the final investment decision remains uncertain. The company has not recognized proved reserves associated with this project.
Refer also to “Pipelines” under “Transportation Operations” beginning on page 26 for a discussion of the West African Gas Pipeline operations.


14


c)  Asia-PacificAsia
 
Major producing countries in the Asia-Pacific regionAsia include Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Partitioned Neutral Zone located between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, and Thailand. During 2009, net oil-equivalent production averaged 1,044,000 barrels per day in Asia.
 
     

     
Australia: During 2008, the average net oil-equivalent production from Chevron’s interests in Australia was 96,000 barrels per day, composed of 34,000 barrels of liquids and 376 million cubic feet of natural gas.

Chevron has a 17 percent nonoperated working interest in the North West Shelf (NWS) Venture offshore Western Australia. Daily net production from the project during 2008 averaged 25,000 barrels of crude oil and condensate, 374 million cubic feet of natural gas, and 4,000 barrels of LPG. Approximately 70 percent of the natural gas was sold in the form of LNG to major utilities in Japan, South Korea and China, primarily under long-term contracts. The remaining natural gas was sold to the Western Australia domestic market.

In September 2008, a fifth LNG train increased processing and export capacity from approximately 12 million metric tons per year to more than 16 million. Part of the natural gas for these expanded facilities is being supplied from the Angel natural-gas field, which started production in October 2008. Additional supply will be provided by the North Rankin 2 project, for which an investment decision was made in March 2008. The project is scheduled to start production in 2013.Proved undeveloped reserves were booked in prior years and will be reclassified to proved developed upon completion of the project.
The NWS Venture is also advancing plans to extend the period of crude-oil production. The NWS Oil Redevelopment Project is designed to replace an FPSO and a portion of existing subsea infrastructure that services production from the Cossack, Hermes, Lambert and Wanaea offshore fields. A final investment decision was made in November 2008 andstart-up is expected early 2011. The project is expected to extend production past 2020. The concession for the NWS Venture expires in 2034.
On Barrow and Thevenard islands off the northwest coast of Australia, Chevron operates crude-oil producing facilities that had combined net production of 5,000 barrels per day in 2008. Chevron’s interests in these operations are 57 percent for Barrow and 51 percent for Thevenard.
Also off the northwest coast of Australia, Chevron is the operator of the Gorgon development and has a 50 percent ownership interest across most of the Greater Gorgon Area. Chevron and two joint-venture participants are planning for the combined development of Gorgon and nearby natural-gas fields as one large-scale project. Environmental approvals were in process and a final investment decision is expected to be made in the second half of 2009 for a three-train, 15 million-metric-ton-per-year LNG facility. Natural gas for the project is expected to be supplied from the Gorgon and Io/Jansz fields. The Gorgon project has an expected economic life of at least 40 years.
At the end of 2008, the company had not recognized proved reserves for any of the Greater Gorgon Area fields. Recognition is contingent on securing sufficient LNG sales agreements and achieving other key project milestones, including receipt of environmental permits. In 2008, negotiations continued to finalize sales agreements with three utility customers in Japan and GS Caltex, a Chevron affiliated company. Purchases by each of these customers are expected to range from 250,000 metric tons per year to 1.5 million metric tons per year over 25 years.


15


In 2008, the company also announced plans for a multi-train LNG plant to process natural gas from its wholly owned Wheatstone discovery located on the northwest cost of mainland Australia. The project is expected to begin FEED during the second half of 2009. During 2008, Chevron conducted appraisal drilling in the Wheatstone and Iago fields. During 2009, the company plans to drill multiple exploration and appraisal wells in its operated acreage. At the end of 2008, the company had not recognized proved reserves for this project.
In the Browse Basin, the company conducted successful appraisal drilling programs in the Calliance and Torosa fields. A commitment well was also drilled to test the northern extension of the Ichthys Field in the eastern Browse Basin. At the end of 2008, proved reserves had not been recognized.
Azerbaijan: Chevron holds a 1010.3 percent nonoperated working interest in the Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC), which produces crude oil in the Caspian Sea from the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli (ACG) project. Chevron also has a 9an 8.9 percent interest in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) affiliate, which transports AIOC production by pipeline from Baku, Azerbaijan, through Georgia to Mediterranean deepwater port facilities in Ceyhan, Turkey. (Refer to “Pipelines” under “Transportation Operations” beginning on page 26 for a discussion of the BTC operations.)

In 2008,2009, the company’s daily net production from AIOC averaged 29,00030,000 barrels of oil-equivalent. First oil from Phase III of ACGThe final investment decision on the next development occurred duringphase is expected in the second quarter 2008. Reserves were reclassified to proved developed shortly beforestart-up. In early 2009, total production was averaging about 670,000 barrels per day. Thefirst half 2010. AIOC operations are conducted under a30-year production-sharing contract (PSC) that expires in 2024.

Kazakhstan: Chevron holds a 20 percentp ercent nonoperated working interest in the Karachaganak project, which is being developed in phases. During 2008,2009, Karachaganak net oil-equivalent production averaged 66,00069,000 barrels per day, composed of 41,00042,000 barrels of liquids and 153161 million cubic feet of natural gas. In 2008,2009, access to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) and Atyrau-Samara (Russia) pipelines enabled approximately 184,000 barrels per day (33,000 net barrels) of Karachaganak sales ofliquids to be sold at world-market
approximately 163,000 barrels per day (30,000 net barrels) of processed liquids at world-market prices. The remaining liquids were sold into Russian markets. During 2008,2009, work continued on a fourth train that is designed to increase thetotal export of processed liquids by 56,000 barrels per day (11,000 net barrels).day. The fourth train is expected to start upstart-up in 2011.
 
During 2008,2009, Chevron and its partners continued to evaluate alternatives for a Phase III development of Karachaganak. Timing for the recognition of Phase III proved reserves is uncertain and depends on finalizing a Phase III project design and achievement ofachieving project milestones. Karachaganak operations are conducted under a40-year PSC that expires in 2038.
 
Refer also to page 23 for a discussion of Tengizchevroil,Equity Affiliate Operations: The company holds a 50 percent-owned affiliate with operationspercent interest in Tengizchevroil (TCO), which is operating and developing the Tengiz and Korolev crude-oil fields, located in western Kazakhstan, under a40-year concession that expires in 2033. Chevron’s net oil-equivalent production in 2009 from these fields averaged 274,000 barrels per day, composed of 226,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 289 million cubic feet of natural gas.
In 2009, TCO continuedramp-up of the Sour Gas Injection (SGI) and Second Generation Plant (SGP) facilities. The SGI facility injects approximately one-third of the sour gas separated from the crude oil back into the reservoir. The injected gas maintains higher reservoir pressure and displaces oil towards producing wells. TCO is evaluating options for another expansion project based on SGI/SGP technologies.
During 2009, the majority of TCO’s crude-oil production was exported through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline that runs from Tengiz in Kazakhstan and to page 26 intanker-loading facilities at Novorossiysk on the Russian coast of the Black Sea. The balance was shipped via other export routes, which included shipment via tanker to Baku for transport by the BTC pipeline to Ceyhan or by rail to Black Sea ports. (Refer to “Pipelines” under “Transportation Operations” beginning on page 26 for a discussion of CPC operations.)


15


Turkey: Chevron holds a 25 percent nonoperated working interest in the Silopi licenses in southeast Turkey, which is on trend with production in Iraq’s northern Zagros Fold Belt. An exploration well in the Lale prospect completed drilling in the first quarter 2010, and is under evaluation.
 
Bangladesh: Chevron operates and has 98 percentholds interests in three operated PSCs incovering onshore Blocks 12, 13 and 14 and an 88offshore Block 7. The company has a 98 percent interest in Blocks 12, 13 and 14. Government approval of a 2009 farm-out in Block 7.7 was received in February 2010, reducing the company’s interest from 88 percent to 43 percent. The farm-out was to GS Caltex, a 50 percent-owned affiliate of the company. Net oil-equivalent production from these operations in 20082009 averaged 71,00066,000 barrels per day, composed of 414387 million cubic feet of natural gas and 2,000 barrels of liquids. In 2009, a final investment decision was achieved after the government approved the development of a compression project that is expected to support additional production starting in 2012 from the Bibiyana, Jalalabad and Moulavi Bazar natural-gas fields. Proved reserves have been recognized for this project. The government also approved an amendment to the PSC for Blocks 13 and 14 that allows the company to acquire additional3-D seismic over the Jalalabad Field. Also in 2009, the company acquired seismic data on Block 7. Evaluation and data processing is under way, and an exploration well is planned to be completed by 2011.
 
Cambodia: Chevron operates and holds a 55 percent interest in the1.2 million-acre (4,709 sq-km) Block A, located offshore in the Gulf of Thailand. During 2008Thailand, and early 2009, evaluation continuedexpects to reduce its ownership to 30 percent pending government approval of the exploratory and appraisalfarm-out that is anticipated in the second quarter 2010. In 2009, commercial evaluation of the prospects continued. The company was granted an extension for the Block A exploration period to the third quarter 2010 in exchange for the obligation to drill three exploration wells. Information gained from the drilling programs that occurredprogram is expected to provide improved definition of the resource in 2007.the block. Proved reserves had not been recognized as of the end of 2008.2009.


16


Myanmar: Chevron has a 2828.3 percent nonoperated working interest in a PSC for the production of natural gas from the Yadana and Sein fields offshore in the Andaman Sea. The company also has a 2828.3 percent interest in a pipeline company that transports the natural gas from Yadana to the Myanmar-Thailand border for delivery to power plants in Thailand. Most of the natural gas is purchased by Thailand’s PTT Public Company Limited (PTT). The company’s average net natural gas production in 20082009 was 8976 million cubic feet per day. During 2009, the platform for a compression project was completed. Projectstart-up is expected in 2011.
 
   

 

Thailand: Chevron has operated and nonoperated working interests in several different offshore blocks. The company’s net oil-equivalent production in 20082009 averaged 217,000198,000 barrels per day, composed of 67,00065,000 barrels of crude oil and condensate and 894794 million cubic feet of natural gas. All of the company’s natural gasnatural-gas production is sold to PTT under long-term sales contracts.

Operated interests are in Pattani and other fields with ownership interests ranging from 35 percent to 80 percent in Blocks 10 through 13, B12/27, B8/32, 9A, G4/43 and G4/48. Blocks B8/32 and 9A produce crude oil and natural gas from sixeight operating areas, and Blocks 10 through 13 and B12/27 produce crude oil, condensate and natural gas from 16 operating areas. First production from Block G4/43 occurred in first quarter 2008.
For Blocks 10 through 13, a final investment decision was made in March 2008 for the construction of a second central natural-gas processing facility in the Platong area. The 70 percent-owned and operated Platong Gas II project is designed to add 420 million cubic feet per day of processing capacity in 2011. The company expects to reclassify proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed throughout the project’s life as the wellhead platforms are installed. Concessions for Blocks 10 through 13 expire in 2022.
Chevron has a 16 percent nonoperated working interest in Blocks 14A, 15A, 16A, G9/48 and G8/50, known collectively as the Arthit Field. First production from Arthit occurred in 2008 and averaged 10,000 net oil-equivalent barrels per day through the end of the year.
 
During 2008,2009, construction at the 69.8 percent-owned and operated Platong Gas II project continued. The project is designed to add 420 million cubic feet per day of processing capacity in 2012. Proved reserves have been recognized for this project. Concessions for Blocks 10 through 13 expire in 2022.
During 2009, 14 exploration wells were drilled in the Gulf of Thailand, 13 were successful and all were successful. Inone nonoperated well in the Arthit Field was unsuccessful. Two3-D seismic surveys and geological studies for Block G4/50 an exploratory joint operating agreement was signedwere also completed in late 2008. A3-D seismic survey and geological studies are scheduled for 2009. Three exploratory wells are planned for 2010. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for these activities. Three exploratory wells in Block G4/50 are planned for the second quarter 2010. For Blocks G6/50 and G7/50, one exploration well is scheduled in each block for completion by the third quarter 2010. In addition, Chevron holds exploration interests in a number of blocks that are currently inactive, pending resolution of border issues between Thailand and Cambodia.


16


Vietnam: The company operates off the southwest coast and has a 4242.4 percent interest in a PSC that includes Blocks B and 48/95, and a 4343.4 percent interest in another PSC for Block 52/97. In August 2009, Chevron also hasreduced its ownership interest in a third operated PSC with a 50 percent-owned and operated interestto 20 percent in Block B122 offshore eastern Vietnam. No production occurred in these areas during 2008.2009.
 
In the blocks off the southwest coast, the Vietnam Gas Project is aimed at developing an area in the Malay Basin to supply natural gas to state-owned PetroVietnam.Petrovietnam. The project includes installation of wellhead and hub platforms, an FSOa floating storage and offloading vessel, field pipelines and a central processing platform. The timing ofproject is expected to enter front-end engineering and design (FEED) in the first natural-gas productionquarter 2010, and a final investment decision is dependent upon the outcome of commercial negotiations.expected in 2011. Maximum total production of approximatelyis planned to be about 500 million cubic feet of natural gas per day is projected within five years ofstart-up.day. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for this project.
 
In conjunction with the Vietnam Gas Project, a Petrovietnam-operated pipeline will be required to support the offshore development. Chevron will have a 28.7 percent interest in the pipeline, which is planned to transport natural gas from the offshore development to customers in southern Vietnam.
During the year, two exploratory wells confirmed hydrocarbons inthe company continued to analyze well results and seismic processing from Block B and Block 52/97. In Block 122,2-D seismic information was purchased in late 2008, withdata processing scheduledand geologic studies were completed. An exploration well is planned for 2009.2011. Proved reserves had not been recognized as of the end of 2008.2009. Future activity in Block 122 may be affected by an ongoing territorial dispute between Vietnam and China.
 


17


     
     
China: Chevron has one operated and three nonoperated working interests in several areas. Net oil-equivalent production from the nonoperated areas in 20082009 averaged 22,00019,000 barrels per day, composed of 19,00017,000 barrels of crude oil and condensate and 2216 million cubic feet of natural gas.

The company holds a 49 percentpercent-owned and operated interest in the Chuandongbei area in the onshore Sichuan Basin, where the company entered into a30-year PSC effective February 2008 to develop natural gasnatural-gas resources. Project plans included two sour-gas purification plants with an aggregate design capacity of 740 million cubic feet per day. A final investment decision was madeDuring 2009, general infrastructure for the first stageplant site and well pads progressed. Development drilling and the construction and installation of the projectadditional processing facilities and gathering systems are expected to start in December 2008, and proved undeveloped2010. Proved reserves werehave been recognized at that time.for this project. The PSC for Chuandongbei e xpires in 2038.

In the South China Sea, the company has nonoperated working interests of 3332.7 percent in Blocks 16/08 and 16/19 located in the Pearl River Delta Mouth Basin, 2524.5 percent in the QHD-32-6 Field in Bohai Bay, and 1616.2 percent in the unitized and producing BZ25-1 Fieldand BZ19-4 crude-oil fields in Bohai Bay Block 11/19. Chevron also holds a 50 percent nonoperated working interest in one prospective onshore natural-gas block in the Ordos Basin.In
November 2009, a storm damaged the floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel utilized by the company’s nonoperated assets in Block 11/19. Temporary and permanent recovery options are under development and production is expected to fully resume in 2012.
 
The joint development of the HZ 25-3HZ25-3 and HZ 25-1HZ25-1 crude-oil fields in Block 16/19 continued through the end of 2009. First production was delayed from the third quarter 2009 and is expected to achieve first productionbe fully restored in the thirdfourth quarter 2009. The maximum total production of approximately 11,000 barrels of crude oil per day is anticipated2010 following damage to the FPSO vessel caused by early 2011.a typhoon that struck the area in September 2009.
 
In 2009, Chevron relinquished its nonoperated working interest in four exploration blocks in the Ordos Basin. Government approval is expected in mid-2010.


17


     
     
Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ):Indonesia: During 2008, the company negotiated a30-year extension to its agreement with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to operate on behalf of the Saudi government its 50 percent interest in the petroleum resources of the onshore area of the PNZ between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Under the extension, Chevron has rights to this 50 percent interest in the hydrocarbon resource and pays a royalty and other taxes on the associated volumes produced until 2039. As a result of the contract extension, the company recognized additional proved reserves.

During 2008, the company’s average net oil-equivalent production was 106,000 barrels per
day, composed of 103,000 barrels of crude oil and 20 million cubic feet of natural gas. Steam injection for the second phase of a steamflood pilot project is anticipated to begin in mid-2009. This pilot is a unique application of steam injection into a carbonate reservoir and, if successful, could significantly increase heavy oil recovery.
Philippines: The company holds a 45 percent nonoperated working interest in the Malampaya natural-gas field located 50 miles (80 km) offshore Palawan Island. Net oil-equivalent production in 2008 averaged 26,000 barrels per day, composed of 128 million cubic feet of natural gas and 5,000 barrels of condensate. Chevron also develops and produces geothermal resources under an agreement with the National Power Corporation, a Philippine government-owned company. The combined generating capacity of the facilities is 637 megawatts.


18


d)  Indonesia
Chevron’s operated interests in Indonesia are managed by several wholly owned subsidiaries, including PT.PT Chevron Pacific Indonesia (CPI). CPI holds operated interests of 100 percent in the Rokan and Siak PSCs.PSCs and 90 percent in the MFK (Mountain Front Kuantan) PSC. Other subsidiaries operate four PSCs in the Kutei Basin, located offshore East Kalimantan, and one PSC in the East Ambalat Block, located offshore northeast Kalimantan. These interests range from 80 percent to 100 percent. Chevron also has nonoperated working interests in a joint venture in Block B in the South Natuna Sea and in the NE Madura III Block in theinthe East Java Sea Basin. Chevron’s interests in these PSCs range from 25 percent to 40 percent.
 
The company’s net oil-equivalent production in 20082009 from all of its interests in Indonesia averaged 235,000243,000 barrels per day. The daily oil-equivalent rate comprised 182,000199,000 barrels of crude oilliquids and 319268 million cubic feet of natural gas. The largest producing field is Duri, located in the Rokan PSC. Duri has been under steamflood operation since 1985 and is one of the world’s largest steamflood developments. The North Duri Development is located in the northern area of the Duri Field and is divided into multiple expansion areas. The first expansion in Area 12 expansion area started production November 2008.steam injection in June 2009. Maximum total daily production from Area 12 is estimated at 34,000 barrels of crude oil in 2012. Proved undeveloped reserves for theA final investment decision regarding North Duri development were recognized in previous years, and reclassification from proved undeveloped to proved developedArea 13 is scheduled to occur during various stages of sequential completion.expected by year-end 2010. The Rokan PSC expires in 2021.
 
Chevron hasadvanced its development plans to developfor the Gendalo and Gehem deepwater natural-gas fields located in the Kutei Basin as a singleBasin. FEED started in December 2009, with completion dependent upon achieving project with one development concept. In October 2008, the company received approval from themilestones and receipt of government of Indonesia for the final development plans.approvals. The Bangka deepwater natural-gas project remainedwas progressed during the year under evaluationa revised, lower-cost development plan. The project is expected to enter FEED in 2008the second quarter 2010. Under the terms of the PSCs for both projects, the company’s 80 percent-owned and based onoperated interest is expected to be reduced to 72 percent in 2010 with the evaluation results, may be developed in parallel with Gendalo and Gehem. The development timing is dependent on government approvals, market conditions and the achievementfarm-in of key project milestones.an Indonesian company. At the end of 2008,2009, the company had not recognized proved reserves for either of these projects. The company holds an 80 percent operated interest in both.
 
Also in the Kutei Basin, first production is expected in March 2009 at the Seturian Field occurred in September 2009, which is providing natural gas to a state-owned refinery. During 2008, the development concept for2009, evaluation of the 50 percent-owned and operated Sadewa project in the Kutei Basin remained under evaluation. A development decision for Sadewa is expected by year-end 2009.was suspended.
 
A drilling campaign continued through 20082009 in South Natuna Sea Block B to provide additional supply for long-term gasnatural-gas sales contracts. Additionalcontracts with additional development drilling planned for 2010. The North Belut development project achieved first production in November 2009. The South Belut development project was under review during the year.
A two-well exploration program was conducted in the North Belut Field beganCentral Sumatra Basin in November 2008, with first production expected2009. One commercial discovery was made in fourth quarter 2009. In November 2008, Chevron was awarded 100 percentthe Rokan Block, and a second well in the Siak Block resulted in a dry hole. Chevron’s working interests in two exploration blocks in western Papua. GeologicalPapua, West Papua I and West Papua III, are expected to be reduced to 51 percent interests in 2010. Completion of geological studies are planned for those blocks was ongoing at year-end 2009, in preparation forand2-D seismic acquisition.acquisition is planned for the second half 2010.
 
In West Java, Chevron operates the wholly owned Salak geothermal field with a total power-generation capacity of 377 megawatts. Also in West Java, Chevron holds a 95 percent interest in a power generation company that operates the Darajat geothermal contract area in Garut with a total capacity of 259 megawatts. Chevron also operates a 95 percent-owned300-megawatt cogeneration facility in support of CPI’s operation in North Duri, Sumatra.


1918


e)  
Partitioned Zone (PZ): Chevron holds aOther International Areas30-year agreement with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to operate on behalf of the Saudi government its 50 percent interest in the petroleum resources of the onshore area of the PZ between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Under the agreement, the company has rights to this 50 percent interest in the hydrocarbon resource and pays royalty and taxes on the associated volumes produced until 2039.

During 2009, the company’s average net oil-equivalent production was 105,000 barrels per day, composed of 101,000 barrels of crude oil and 21 million cubic feet of natural gas. In June 2009, steam injection was initiated in the second phase of a steamflood pilot project.
The “Other International” regionpilot is an application of steam injection into a carbonate reservoir and, if successful, could significantly increase heavy oil recovery. The Central Gas Utilization Project was initiated in 2009 to assess alternatives to increase natural-gas utilization and eliminate routine flaring. A final investment decision is expected in 2011. No reserves have been recognized for these projects.
Philippines: The company holds a 45 percent nonoperated working interest in the Malampaya natural-gas field located 50 miles (80 km) offshore Palawan Island. Net oil-equivalent production in 2009 averaged 27,000 barrels per day, composed of 137 million cubic feet of natural gas and 4,000 barrels of condensate. Chevron also develops and produces geothermal resources under an agreement with the Philippine government. Chevron expects to sign a new25-year contract with the government by the end of 2010 to operate the steam fields, which supply geothermal resources to the 637 megawatt geothermal facilities.
d)  Other
“Other” is composed of Latin America,Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Canada, Greenland, Denmark, Faroe Islands, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland and Europe.the United Kingdom. Net oil-equivalent production from countries included in this section averaged 484,000 barrels per day during 2009. In addition, the company’s share of production from oil sands (for upgrading into synthetic oil) from the Athabasca Oil Sands Project in Canada was 26,000 barrels per day.
 
     
Australia: During 2009, the average net oil-equivalent production from Chevron’s interests in Australia was 108,000 barrels per day, composed of 35,000 barrels of liquids and 434 million cubic feet of natural gas.

Chevron has a 16.7 percent nonoperated working interest in the North West Shelf (NWS) Venture offshore Western Australia. Daily net production from the project during 2009 averaged 26,000 barrels of crude oil and condensate, 433 million cubic feet of natural gas, and 5,000 barrels of LPG. Approximately 70 percent of the natural gas was sold in the form of LNG to major utilities in Japan, South Korea and China, primarily under long-term contracts. The remaining natural gas was sold to the Western Australia domestic market.

The NWS Venture continues to progress two major capital projects that achieved final investment decision in 2008. Fabrication of platform topsides for the North Rankin 2 project commenced in June 2009. The proj ect is designed to recover remaining low-pressure natural gas from the North Rankin and Perseus natural-gas fields to meet gas supply needs and includes necessary tie-ins to, and refurbishment of, the North Rankin A platform. Upon completion, both platforms are


19


designed to be operated as a single integrated facility. The project is scheduled to start production in 2013. Proved reserves have been recognized for the project.
The NWS Venture is also advancing plans to extend the period of crude-oil production. The NWS Oil Redevelopment Project is designed to replace the present floating production, storage and offloading vessel and a portion of existing subsea infrastructure that services production from the Cossack, Hermes, Lambert and Wanaea offshore fields. In 2009, work commenced on conversion of the replacement vessel. The project is expected tostart-up in early 2011 and extend production past 2020. The concession for the NWS Venture expires in 2034.
On Barrow and Thevenard islands off the northwest coast of Australia, Chevron operates crude-oil producing facilities that had combined net production of 4,000 barrels per day in 2009. Chevron’s interests in these operations are 57.1 percent for Barrow and 51.4 percent for Thevenard.
Also off the northwest coast of Australia, Chevron holds significant equity interests in the large natural-gas resource of the Greater Gorgon Area. The company initially held a 50 percent ownership interest across most of the area and is the operator of the Gorgon Project. Chevron and its joint-venture partners are proceeding with the combined development of Gorgon and nearby natural-gas fields as one large-scale project. Environmental approval from the Australian Commonwealth Government was issued in August 2009. In September 2009, the company announced the final investment decision and total estimated project costs for the first phase of development of $37 billion (AU$ 43 billion). The project’s scope includes a three-train, 15 million-metric-ton-per-year LNG facility; a carbon sequestration project; and a domestic natural-gas plant. Natural gas for the project is expected to be supplied from the Gorgon and Io/Jansz fields.
In 2009, long-term, binding agreements were finalized with four Asian customers for the delivery of about 4.4 million metric tons per year of LNG from the Gorgon Project. Equity sales agreements with three of the customers reduced Chevron’s interest in the project to 47.3 percent at the end of 2009. Nonbinding Heads of Agreements (HOA) for delivery of an additional 2.1 million metric tons per year of LNG were also signed with three additional Asian customers in 2009 and early 2010. Negotiations continue to finalize binding sales agreements, which would bring LNG delivery commitments to a combined total of about 90 percent of Chevron’s share of LNG from the project. During 2009, the company recognized proved reserves for the Greater Gorgon Area fields included in the project. First production of natural gas from these fields is expected in 2014. The project’s estimated economic life exceeds 40 years from the time ofstart-up.
Development of the company’s majority-owned and operated Wheatstone and Iago fields, located offshore Western Australia, continued with the project entering front-end engineering and design (FEED) in July 2009. Chevron operates the project and plans to supply natural gas to its 75 percent-owned and operated LNG facilities from two 100 percent-owned licenses comprising the majority of the Wheatstone Field and part of the nearby Iago Field. In October 2009, agreements were signed with two companies to join the Wheatstone Project as combined 25 percent LNG facility owners and suppliers of natural gas for the project’s first two LNG trains. In December 2009 and January 2010, nonbinding HOAs were signed with two Asian customers to take delivery of 4.9 million tons of LNG per year from the project, representing about 60 percent of the total LNG available from the foundation project. In addition, under these same HOAs the parties would acquire a combined 16.8 percent nonoperated working interest in the Wheatstone Field licenses and a 12.6 percent interest in the foundation natural-gas processing facilities at the final investment decision. At the end of 2009, the company had not recognized proved reserves for this project.
In the Browse Basin, the company continued engineering and survey work on two potential development concepts for the Brecknock, Calliance and Torosa fields. At the end of 2009, proved reserves had not been recognized.
In May 2009, the company announced the successful completion of a well at the Clio prospect to further explore and appraise the 66.7 percent-owned Block WA-205-P. In 2009 and early 2010, the company also announced natural-gas discoveries at the Kentish Knock prospect in the 50 percent-owned Block WA-365-P, the Achilles and Satyr prospects in the 50 percent-owned Block WA-374-P and the Yellowglen prospect in the 50 percent-owned WA-268-P Block. All prospects are Chevron-operated. At the end of 2009, proved reserves had not been recognized.


20


     
Argentina: Chevron holds operated interests in severaleight concessions and one exploratory block in the Neuquen and Austral basins.Basin. Working interests range from 1918.8 percent to 100 percent. Net oil-equivalent production in 20082009 averaged 44,00038,000 barrels per day, composed of 37,00033,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 4527 million cubic feet of natural gas. The company also holds a 14 percent interest in the Oleoductos del Valle S.A. pipeline. In 2009, Chevron sold its oil and gas concession in the Austral Basin and its interest in the Confluencia Field in the Neuquen Basin.

Brazil: Chevron holds working interests ranging from 30 percent to 52 percent in three deepwater blocks in the Campos Basin. Chevron also holds a 20 percent nonoperated working interest in one block in the Santos Basin. None of these blocks hadNet oil-equivalent production in 2008.2009 averaged 2,000 barrels per day.

In Block BC-4,The Frade Field, located in the Campos Basin, the companyachieved first oil in June 2009. Chevron is the operator and has a 5251.7 percent interest in the Frade Field, whichfield. Additional development drilling is under development as a subsea production design. Proved undeveloped reserves were recorded for the first time in 2005. Partial reclassification to the proved-developed category is scheduled upon productionstart-up in 2009. Estimatedway, with an estimated maximum total production of 87,00072,000 oil-equivalent barrels per day is anticipated in 2011.day. The concession that includes the Frade project expires in 2025.

In the partner-operated Campos Basin Block BC-20, two areas — 3837.5 percent-owned Papa-Terra and 30 percent-owned Maromba — were retained for development followingdevelopmentfollowing the end of the exploration phase of this block. Evaluation of design options continued intoThe Papa-Terra project progressed through FEED, and a
2009.final investment decision was made in January 2010. The project operator estimates total costs of $5.2 billion and expects first production in 2013. The facility is expected to be capable of producing up to 140,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Evaluation of design options for Maromba continued into 2010. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for these projects.
 
In the Santos basin,Basin, evaluation of investment options continued into 20092010 for the 20 percent-owned and partner-operated Atlanta and Oliva fields. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized.recognized for these fields.
 
Colombia: The company operates the offshore Chuchupa and the onshore Ballena and Riohacha natural gasnatural-gas fields as part of the Guajira Association contract. In exchange, Chevron receives 43 percent of the production for the remaining life of each field and a variable production volume from a fixed-fee Build-Operate-Maintain-Transfer agreement based on prior Chuchupa capital contributions. Daily net production averaged 209245 million cubic feet of natural gas in 2008.2009.
 
Trinidad and Tobago: Company interests include 50 percent ownership in fourthree partner-operated blocks in the East Coast Marine Area offshore Trinidad, which includes the Dolphin and Dolphin Deep producing natural-gas fields and the Starfish discovery. Chevron also holds a 50 percent operated interest in the Manatee area of Block 6d.6(d). Net production in 20082009 averaged 189199 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. Incremental production associated with a new domestic sales agreement is scheduled to commencecommenced at Dolphin in the third quarter 2009.
 
Venezuela: The company operates in two exploratory blocks offshore Plataforma Deltana, with working interests of 60 percent in Block 2 and 100 percent in Block 3. Chevron also holds a 100 percent operated interest in the Cardon III exploratory block, located north of Lake Maracaibo in the Gulf of Venezuela. Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA), Venezuela’s national crude-oil and natural-gas company, has the option to increase its ownership in each of the three company-operated blocks up to 35 percent upon declaration of commerciality. In February 2010, a Chevron-led consortium was selected to participate in a heavy-oil project composed of three blocks in the Orinoco Oil Belt of eastern Venezuela. The consortium is expected to acquire a 40 percent interest in the project, with PDVSA holding the remaining interest.
 
A conceptual development plan has been completed for theThe Loran Field in Block 2. Loran2 is projected to provide the initial supply of natural gas for Delta Caribe LNG (DCLNG) Train 1, Venezuela’s first LNG train. A DCLNG framework agreement was signed in September 2008, which provides Chevron with

21


a 10 percent nonoperated interest in the first train and the associated offshore pipeline. An interim operating agreement governing activities prior to a final investment decision was signed by Chevron and its Train 1 partners in March 2009. In May 2009, the company relinquished part of Block 3 and retained the portion containing the 2005 Macuira natural-gas discovery. An unsuccessful exploration well is plannedwas drilled in the Cardon III block in 2009. The company plans to continue to evaluate exploration potential in the Cardon III block in 2010. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized in these exploratory blocks.
 
Equity Affiliate Operations:Chevron also holds interestinterests in two affiliates located in western Venezuela and in one affiliate in the Orinoco Belt. Refer to pageChevron has a 30 percent interest in the Petropiar affiliate that operates the Hamaca heavy-oil production and upgrading project located in Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt, a 39.2 percent interest in the Petroboscan affiliate that operates the Boscan Field in the western part of the country, and a 25.2 percent interest in the Petroindependiente affiliate that operates the LL-652 Field in Lake Maracaibo. The company’s share of average net oil-equivalent production during 2009 from these operations was 54,000 barrels per day, composed of 51,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 23 for a discussionmillion cubic feet of affiliate operations in Venezuela.natural gas.
 


20


     
     
Canada: Company activities in Canada include nonoperated working interests of 2726.9 percent in the Hibernia Field and 26.6 percent in the Hebron fieldsField, both offshore eastern Canada, and 20 percent in the Athabasca Oil Sands Project (AOSP), and operated interests of 60 percent in the Ells River “In Situ” Oil Sands Project. Excluding volumes mined at AOSP, average net oil-equivalent production during 20082009 was 37,00028,000 barrels per day, composed of 36,00027,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 4 million cubic feet of natural gas.

Substantially all of this production was from the Hibernia Field, where athe working interest owners are also pursuing development plan is being formulated for a proposedof the Hibernia South Extension. At AOSP,Southern Extension (HSE). Development of the company’s share of mined bitumen (for upgrading into synthetic crude oil) averaged 27,000 barrels per day during 2008.

For Hebron, agreements were reached during
2008 withHSE nonunitized area was approved by the provincial government of Newfoundlandregulator in 2009, and Labrador that allow development activities to begin. As of the end of 2008,first producing well for the company had not recognizedproject was completed at year-end.
In February 2010, binding agreements were signed with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador on the development of the HSE unitized area, providing Chevron with a 23.6 percent nonoperated working interest in the unitized area.
For Hebron, agreements were reached during 2008 with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador that allow development activities to begin. At the end of 2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for this project.
 
At AOSP, the company’s production from oil sands (for upgrading into synthetic oil) averaged 26,000 barrels per day during 2009. The first phase of an expansion project is under way thatand is designedexpected to produce an additionalincrease total production from oil sands by 100,000 barrels per day of mined bitumen.day. The expansion would increase total AOSP design capacity to more than 255,000 barrels per day in late 2010. The projected cost of this expansion is $13.7$14.3 billion.
 
The Ells River project consists of heavy oilheavy-oil leases of more than 85,000 acres (344 sq km). The area contains significant volumes with potential for recovery by using Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, an industry-proven technology that employs steam and horizontal drilling to extract the bitumenproduction from oil sands through wells rather than through mining operations. During 2008,Additional field appraisal activity is not planned in the company completed an appraisal drilling program and a seismic survey. An additional seismic program started in late 2008 and is expected to be completed in March 2009.near-term. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized.
 
The company also holds exploration leases in the Mackenzie Delta and Beaufort Sea region, including a 3334 percent nonoperated working interest in the offshore Amauligak discovery. Three exploration wells were drilled on company leases in the Mackenzie Delta region in 2008. Drilling on three additional wells in the Mackenzie Delta is expected to be completed in second quarter 2009, and assessment of development concept alternatives for Amauligak continued.continues. The company holds additional exploration acreage in eastern Labrador and the Orphan Basin. In 2009, the company was also successful in acquiring a western Canada lease position to explore for shale gas. At the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for any of these areas.


22


Greenland: Chevron has a 29 percent nonoperated working interest in an exploration licenseProcessing of the2-D seismic survey acquired over License 2007/26 in Block 4 offshore West Greenland in 2008 continued in 2009, and evaluation will commence in the Baffin Basin. A2-D seismic survey was completedfirst-half 2010. Chevron has a 29.2 percent nonoperated working interest in 2008, and interpretation of the data is expected to occur in 2009.this exploration license.
 

21


     

     

Denmark: Chevron has a 15 percent working interest in the partner-operated Danish Underground Consortium (DUC), which produces crude oil and natural gas from 15 fields in the Danish North Sea. Net oil-equivalent production in 20082009 from DUC averaged 61,00055,000 barrels per day, composed of 37,00035,000 barrels of crude oil and 142119 million cubic feet of natural gas. DUC development activity in the region includes the ongoing Halfdan Phase IV project, which achieved first production in July 2009.

Faroe Islands: Chevron operates and holds a 40 percent interestwithdrew from License 008 in five offshore exploratory blocks. During 2008,2009, but continues to assess exploration opportunities in the company acquired additional2-D seismic data for an area located near the Rosebank/Lochnagar discovery offshore the United Kingdom. Engineering and geological evaluation of the seismic data continued into early 2009. As of the end of 2008, proved reserves had not been recognized.area.

Netherlands: Chevron is the operatoroperates and holds interests ranging from 3434.1 percent to 80 percent in nineeight blocks in the Dutch sector of the North Sea. In 2008,2009, the company’s net oil-equivalent production from the five producing blocks was 9,000 barrels per day, composed of 2,000 barrels of crude oil and 40 million41  ;million cubic feet of natural gas. In 2009 Chevron divested its 48 percent interest in the L11/b license.
Norway: The company holds an 8a 7.6 percent interest in the partner-operated Draugen Field. The company’s net production averaged 6,0005,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day during 2008.2009. In 2009, Chevron was awarded a 40 percent working interest as operator of the 40exploration license PL 527 in the deepwater portion of the Norwegian Sea. Data acquisition was completed on a2-D seismic survey, and evaluation is under way.
Poland: In December 2009, Chevron was awarded three five-year exploration licenses in the Zwierzyniec, Kransnik and Frampol concessions, and in February 2010, Chevron acquired the exploration rights to the Grabowiec concession. Chevron has a 100 percent-owned and partner-operated PL397 areaoperated interest in the Barents Sea, additional3-D seismic information was obtained in 2008, with evaluation of the data continuing into 2009.these four concessions to explore for shale gas.
 
United Kingdom: The company’s average net oil-equivalent production in 20082009 from 1110 offshore fields was 106,000110,000 barrels per day, composed of 71,00073,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 208222 million cubic feet of natural gas. Most of the production was from the 85 percent-owned and operated Captain Field, the 23.4 percent-owned and operated Alba Field and the 3232.4 percent-owned and jointly operated Britannia Field.
 
TwoEvaluation of development alternatives continued during 2009 for the 19.4 percent-owned and partner-operated satellite fieldsClair Phase 2 project west of Britannia commenced production in 2008 — the 17 percent-owned Callanish Field in the second quarter and the 25 percent-owned Brodgar Field in the third quarter.
AtShetland Islands. In the 40 percent-owned and operated Rosebank/Lochnagar area northwest of the Shetland Islands, an exploration well in an adjacent structure is expected to beRosebank North was completed in second-quarterthe second quarter 2009 and an appraisal well is planned for laterin Rosebank/Lochnagar was completed in the year. Evaluationthird quarter 2009. Also northwest of the Shetland Islands, a three-well exploration and appraisal drilling program was completed in 2009 at the Cambo prospect. Technical studies have commenced to select a preferred development alternatives continued during 2008 foralternative. Additional exploration drilling in the 19 percent-owned and partner-operated Clair Phase 2 and 10 percent-owned and partner-operated Laggan/Tormore projects.region is expected to occur in the second-half 2010. As of the end of 2008,2009, proved reserves had not been recognized for any of these three exploration areas.prospects.
 
Equity Affiliate Operations
Angola:In addition toFebruary 2010, the exploration and producing activities in Angola, Chevron has a 36company sold its 10 percent ownershipnonoperated interest in the Angola LNG affiliate that began construction in early 2008 of an onshore natural gas liquefaction plant located in the northern part of the country. The plant is designed to process more than 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. Plantstart-up is scheduled for 2012. Chevron made an initial booking of proved undeveloped natural-gas reserves in 2007 for the producing operations associated with this LNG project. The life of the LNG plant is estimated to be in excess of 20 years.Laggan/Tormore discovery.

22


Kazakhstan: The company holds a 50 percent interest in Tengizchevroil (TCO), which operates and is developing the Tengiz and Korolev crude-oil fields, located in western Kazakhstan, under a40-year concession that expires in 2033. Chevron’s net oil-equivalent production in 2008 from these fields averaged 201,000 barrels per day, composed of 168,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 195 million cubic feet of natural gas.
 
In 2008, TCO completed a significant expansion composed of two integrated projects referred to as Second Generation Plant (SGP) and Sour Gas Injection (SGI). Total cost of the project was $7.4 billion. The projects increased TCO’s daily production capacity to 540,000 barrels of crude oil, 760 million cubic feet of natural gas and 46,000 barrels of natural gas liquids. The SGI facility injects approximately one-third of the sour gas separated from the crude oil back into the reservoir. The injected gas maintains higher reservoir pressure and displaces oil towards producing wells. The company recognized additional proved reserves associated with SGI in 2008. TCO is evaluating options for another expansion project based on SGI/SGP technologies.
During 2008, the majority of TCO’s production was exported through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline that runs from Tengiz in Kazakhstan to tanker-loading facilities at Novorossiysk on the Russian coast of the Black Sea. The majority of the incremental production from SGI/SGP was moved by rail to Black Sea ports. Other export routes included shipment via tanker to Baku for transport by the BTC pipeline to Ceyhan or by rail to Black Sea ports. (Refer to “Pipelines” under “Transportation Operations” beginning on page 26 for a discussion of CPC operations.)
Nigeria: Chevron holds a 19 percent interest in the OKLNG Free Zone Enterprise (OKLNG) affiliate, which will operate the Olokola LNG project. OKLNG plans to build a multitrain natural gas liquefaction facility and marine terminal located northwest of Escravos. The project is expected to be implemented in phases, starting with two 6.3 million-ton-per-year trains. Approximately 50 percent of the gas supplied to the plant is expected to be provided from the producing areas associated with Chevron’s joint-venture arrangement with Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation. At the end of 2008, a final investment decision had not been reached, and the company had not recognized proved reserves associated with this project.
Venezuela: Chevron has a 30 percent interest in the Petropiar affiliate that operates the Hamaca heavy-oil production and upgrading project located in Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt, a 39 percent interest in the Petroboscan affiliate that operates the Boscan Field in the western part of the country, and a 25 percent interest in the Petroindependiente affiliate that operates the LL-652 Field in Lake Maracaibo. The company’s share of average net oil-equivalent production during 2008 from these operations was 66,000 barrels per day, composed of 62,000 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 27 million cubic feet of natural gas.
Sales of Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids
 
The company sells natural gas and natural gas liquids from its producing operations under a variety of contractual arrangements. In addition, the company also makes third-party purchases and sales of natural gas and natural gas liquids in connection with its trading activities.


23


During 2009, U.S. and international sales of natural gas were 5.9 billion and 4.1 billion cubic feet per day, respectively, which includes the company’s share of equity affiliates’ sales. Outside the United States, substantially all of the natural gasnatural-gas sales are from the company’s producing interests are from operations in Australia, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, Latin America, the Philippines, Thailand and the United Kingdom. The company also makes third-party purchases
U.S. and international sales of natural gas liquids were 161 thousand and 111 thousand barrels per day, respectively, in connection with its trading activities.2009. Substantially all of the international sales of natural gas liquids are from company operations in Africa, Australia and Indonesia.
 
Refer to “Selected Operating Data,” onpage FS-10 in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further information on the company’s sales volumes of natural gas and natural gas liquids. Refer also to “Delivery Commitments” on page 8 for information related to the company’s delivery commitments for the sale of crude oil and natural gas.


23


Downstream — Refining, Marketing and Transportation
 
 
At the end of 2008,2009, the company had a refining network capable of processing 2.1more than 2 million barrels of crude oil per day. DailyOperable capacity at December 31, 2009, and daily refinery inputs for 20062007 through 20082009 for the company and affiliate refineries were as follows:
 
Petroleum Refineries: Locations, Capacities and Inputs
(Crude-unit capacities and crude-oil inputs in thousands of barrels per day; includes equity share in affiliates)
 
                                            
   December 31, 2008         December 31, 2009       
   Operable
 Refinery Inputs      Operable
 Refinery Inputs 
LocationsLocations Number Capacity 2008 2007 2006 Locations Number Capacity 2009 2008 2007 
Pascagoula Mississippi  1   330   299   285   337  Mississippi  1   330   345   299   285 
El Segundo California  1   265   263   222   258  California  1   269   247   263   222 
Richmond California  1   243   237   192   224  California  1   243   218   237   192 
Kapolei Hawaii  1   54   46   51   50  Hawaii  1   54   49   46   51 
Salt Lake City Utah  1   45   38   42   39  Utah  1   45   40   38   42 
Other1
    1   80   8   20   31 
Perth Amboy1
 New Jersey  1   80      8   20 
                      
Total Consolidated Companies United States
Total Consolidated Companies United States
  6   1,017   891   812   939 
Total Consolidated CompaniesUnited States
  6   1,021   899   891   812 
                       
Pembroke United Kingdom  1   210   203   212   165  United Kingdom  1   210   205   203   212 
Cape Town2
 South Africa  1   110   75   72   71  South Africa  1   110   72   75   72 
Burnaby, B.C. Canada  1   55   36   49   49  Canada  1   55   49   36   49 
                      
Total Consolidated Companies International
Total Consolidated Companies International
  3   375   314   333   285 
Total Consolidated CompaniesInternational
  3   375   326   314   333 
Affiliates3
 Various Locations  9   747   653   688   765  Various Locations  8   762   653   653   688 
                      
Total Including AffiliatesInternational
Total Including AffiliatesInternational
  12   1,122   967   1,021   1,050 
Total Including AffiliatesInternational
  11   1,137   979   967   1,021 
                       
Total Including Affiliates Worldwide
Total Including Affiliates Worldwide
    18     2,139     1,858     1,833     1,989 
Total Including AffiliatesWorldwide
    17     2,158     1,878     1,858     1,833 
                       
 
1Asphalt plant in Perth Amboy New Jersey. Plant washas been idled during 2008.since early 2008 and is operated as a terminal.
2Chevron holds 100 percent of the common stock issued by Chevron South Africa (Pty) Limited, which owns the Cape Town Refinery. A consortium of South African partners owns preferred shares ultimately convertible to a 25 percent equity interest in Chevron South Africa (Pty) Limited. None of the preferred shares had been converted as of February 2009.2010.
3Chevron sold its 31 percent interest in the Nerefco Refinery in the Netherlands in March 2007. During 2008, the company sold its 4 percent ownership interest in a refinery in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire,Includes 3,000, 6,000 and its 8 percent ownership interest in a refinery in Cameroon, decreasing the company’s combined share of operable capacity by about 5,00035,000 barrels per day.day of refinery inputs in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for interests in refineries that were sold during those periods.
 
Average crude oil distillation capacity utilization during 20082009 was 8791 percent, compared with 8587 percent in 2007. This increase generally resulted from an improvement in2008, largely a result of improved utilization at the refineries in RichmondMississippi, Canada and El Segundo, California.Thailand. At the U.S. fuel refineries, crude oil distillation capacity utilization averaged 96 percent in 2009, compared with 95 percent in 2008, compared with 85 percent in 2007, and cracking and coking capacity utilization averaged 85 percent and 86 percent in 2009 and 78 percent in 2008, and 2007, respectively. Cracking and coking units are the primary facilities used in fuel refineries to convert heavier feedstocks into gasoline and other light products.
 
The company’s refineries in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, South Africa and Australia produce low-sulfur fuels. During 2009, GS Caltex, the company’s 50 percent-owned affiliate, completedcontinued construction in 2008 on projects to produce low-sulfur fuels at the700,000 barrel-per-day Yeosu refining complex in South Korea. Other projects completed during the year at Yeosu included a new heavy-oil hydrocracker complex and distillation unit that increasesdesigned to increase high-value product yield and lowerslower feedstock costs. In 2009, construction continuescosts at the Yeosu, complex on projects designed to further improve processing of higher-sulfur crude oils and reduce fuel-oil production. AtSouth Korea


24


complex. Project completion is expected in 2010. Modifications were completed in 2009 that enable the company’s 50 percent-owned Singapore Refining Company, construction continued during 2008 and into early 2009 to enable theCompany’s refinery to meet regional specifications for clean diesel fuels.
 
At the Pascagoula refinery, various projects were completed during 2008 that enhanced the ability to process heavier, higher-sulfur crudes, resulting in lower crude-acquisition costs. In addition,Refinery, construction progressed on a continuous catalytic reformer that is expected to improve refinery reliability and increase daily gasoline production at the refinery by 10 percent, or 600,000 gallons per day, by mid-2010. At the Richmond and El Segundo refineries, constructionreliability. Planning continued and design and engineering work advanced during 2008 to further increase the ability to process high-sulfur crude oils and improve high-value product yields.


24


In August 2008, Chevron submitted an environmental permit application to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality for the construction of a premium base oilbase-oil facility at the company’s Pascagoula Refinery. The facility is expectedbeing designed to have daily production ofproduce approximately 25,000 barrels per day of premium base oil for use in manufacturing high-performance lubricants, such as motor oils for consumer and commercial uses.applications. At the refinery in El Segundo, California, design, engineering and construction work advanced during 2009 on projects that will reduce feedstock costs and improve yields.
 
At the beginning of 2009, Chevron holdsheld a 5 percent interest in Reliance Petroleum Limited, a company formed by Reliance Industries Limited to construct a new refinery in Jamnagar, India. Chevron has rights to increaseDuring the year, the company sold its equity ownership to 295 percent or to sell back its investmentinterest to Reliance Industries Limited. These rights expire the later of July 27, 2009, or three months after the plant is fully commissioned.
 
Chevron processes imported and domestic crude oil in its U.S. refining operations. Imported crude oil accounted for about 8885 percent and 8788 percent of Chevron’s U.S. refinery inputs in 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.
 
Gas-to-Liquids
 
In Nigeria, Chevron and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation are developing a34,00033,000 barrel-per-daygas-to-liquids facility at Escravos designed to process 325 million cubic feet per day of natural gas supplied from the Phase 3A expansion of the Escravos Gas Plant (EGP). At the end of 2008, engineering was essentially complete and facility2009, construction was under way.way with twogas-to-liquids reactors and the process modules delivered to the site. Chevron has a 75 percent interest in the plant, which is expected to be operational by 2012. The estimated cost of the plant is $5.9 billion. Refer also to page 14 for a discussion on the EGP Phase 3A expansion.
 
Marketing Operations
 
The company markets petroleum products under the principal brands of “Chevron,” “Texaco” and “Caltex” throughout much of the world. The table below identifies the company’s and affiliates’ refined products sales volumes, excluding intercompany sales, for the three years endingended December 31, 2008.2009.
 
Refined Products Sales Volumes1
(Thousands of Barrels per Day)
 
                        
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
United States                        
Gasolines  692   728   712   720   692   728 
Jet Fuel  274   271   280   254   274   271 
Gas Oils and Kerosene  229   221   252   226   229   221 
Residual Fuel Oil  127   138   128   110   127   138 
Other Petroleum Products2
  91   99   122 
Other Petroleum Products1
  93   91   99 
              
Total United States
  1,413   1,457   1,494   1,403   1,413   1,457 
              
International3
            
International2
            
Gasolines  589   581   595   555   589   581 
Jet Fuel  278   274   266   264   278   274 
Gas Oils and Kerosene  710   730   776   647   710   730 
Residual Fuel Oil  257   271   324   209   257   271 
Other Petroleum Products2
  182   171   166 
Other Petroleum Products1
  176   182   171 
              
Total International
  2,016   2,027   2,127   1,851   2,016   2,027 
              
Total Worldwide3
  3,429   3,484   3,621 
Total Worldwide2
  3,254   3,429   3,484 
              
 
                            
1
 Includes buy/sell arrangements. Refer to Note 14 on page FS-43.        50  Principally naphtha, lubricants, asphalt and coke.         
2
 Principally naphtha, lubricants, asphalt and coke.          Includes share of equity affiliates’ sales:  516   512   492 
3
 Includes share of equity affiliates’ sales:  512   492   492 
 


25


In the United States, the company markets under the Chevron and Texaco brands. TheAt year-end 2009, the company suppliessupplied directly or through retailers and marketers approximately 9,7009,600 Chevron- and Texaco-branded motor vehicle retail outlets,service stations, primarily in the mid-Atlantic, southern and western states. Approximately 500 of these outlets are company-owned or -leased stations. The company plans to discontinue, by mid-2010, sales of Chevron- and Texaco-branded motor fuels in the mid-Atlantic and other eastern states, where the company sold to retail customers through approximately 1,100 stations and to commercial and industrial customers through supply arrangements. Sales in these markets represent approximately 8 percent of the company’s total U.S. retail fuels sales volumes. Additionally, in January 2010, the company sold the rights to the Gulf trademark in the United States and its territories that it had previously licensed for use in the U.S. Northeast and Puerto Rico.


25


Outside the United States, Chevron suppliessupplied directly or through retailers and marketers approximately 15,30012,400 branded service stations, including affiliates. In British Columbia, Canada, the company markets under the Chevron brand. The company markets in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Latin America and the Caribbean using the Texaco brand. In the Asia-Pacific region, southern Africa, Egypt and Pakistan, the company uses the Caltex brand.
 
The company also operates through affiliates under various brand names. In South Korea, the company operates through its 50 percent-owned affiliate, GS Caltex, using the GS Caltex brand. The company’sand in Australia through its 50 percent-owned affiliate, in Australia, Caltex Australia Limited, operates using the Caltex and Ampol brands.Limited.
 
In 2008,2009, the company announced agreements to sell marketing-relatedcompleted the sale of businesses in Brazil, Haiti, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, Benin, Cameroon, Republic of the Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, Kenya, Uganda, India, Italy, Peru and Togo.Chile. The company will retainretained its lubricants business in Brazil. The company also completed the sale of its heating-oil business in the United Kingdom. In addition, the company sold its interest in about 350465 individual service-station sites.sites in various other countries, including the United States. The majority of these sites will continue to market company-branded gasoline through new supply agreements.
 
The company also manages other marketing businesses globally. Chevron markets aviation fuel at more than 1,000875 airports. The company also markets an extensive line of lubricant and coolant products under brand names that include Havoline, Delo, Ursa, Meropa and Taro.
 
Transportation Operations
 
Pipelines: Chevron owns and operates an extensive systemnetwork of crude oil, refined products,crude-oil, refined-product, chemicals, natural gas liquidsnatural-gas-liquids (NGL) and natural gasnatural-gas pipelines and other infrastructure assets in the United States. The company also has direct or indirect interests in other U.S. and international pipelines. The company’s ownership interests in pipelines are summarized in the following table.
 
Pipeline Mileage at December 31, 20082009
 
     
  Net Mileage11,2 
United States:    
Crude Oil2
  2,8862,803 
Natural Gas  2,2632,255 
Petroleum Products3
  6,0305,768 
     
Total United States
  11,17910,826 
International:    
Crude Oil2
  700 
Natural Gas  576613 
Petroleum Products3
  433438 
     
Total International  1,7091,751 
     
Worldwide
  12,88812,577 
     
 
   
1
 Partially owned pipelines are included at the company’s equity percentage.percentage of total pipeline mileage.
2
 IncludesExcludes gathering lines related to the transportation function. Excludes gathering lines related to U.S. and international crude-oil and natural-gas production activities.function.
3
 Includes refined products, chemicals and natural gas liquids.the company’s share of chemical pipelines managed by the 50 percent-owned Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC.
 
During 2008, the company completed the construction of a natural gas gathering pipeline serving the Piceance Basin in northwest Colorado; participated in the successful installation of the Amberjack-Tahiti lateral pipeline2009, work progressed on the seafloor of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico; and led the expansion of the West Texas LPG pipeline system. Chevron also continued with a project during 2008that is designed to expand capacity by about 2 billion cubic feet at the Keystone natural-gas storage facility.facility near Midland, Texas, which would bring the total capacity of the facility to nearly 7 billion cubic feet. The project completion is anticipated in the second quarter 2010.


26


Work commenced in late 2009 to bring the Cal-Ky Pipeline, which was decommissioned in 2002, back into crude-oil service as a supply line for the Pascagoula Refinery. This crude-oil pipeline is also expected to provide additional outlets for the company’s equity production. The pipeline is expected to be completedreturn to service in late 2009.2011. The company is also leading the evaluation and negotiations associated with a 136 mile,24-inch pipeline from the proposed Jack and St. Malo production facility to Green Canyon 19 in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. In December 2009, the company sold its interest in the western portion of the Texaco Expanded NGL Distribution System and its 64 percent ownership interest in Southcap Pipeline Company, which included Chevron’s 13.4 percent ownership interest in the Capline Pipeline.
 
Chevron has a 15 percent interest in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) affiliate. CPC operates a crude oilcrude-oil export pipeline from the Tengiz Field in Kazakhstan to the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. During 2008,2009, CPC transported an average of approximately 675,000743,000 barrels of crude oil per day, including 557,000597,000 barrels per day from Kazakhstan and 118,000146,000 barrels per day from Russia. In late 2008,December 2009, partners approved the CPC partners signed a Memorandum of UnderstandingExpansion Project Implementation Plan, which is expected to expandincrease the designpipeline capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day. A final investment decision is expected after commercial terms have been agreed upon and required government approvals have been received.in late 2010.


26


The company has a 9an 8.9 percent interest in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) affiliate that owns and operates a pipeline that transports primarily thetransports crude oil produced by Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC) (owned 1010.3 percent by Chevron) from Baku, Azerbaijan, through Georgia to deepwater port facilities in Ceyhan, Turkey. The BTC pipeline has a crude-oil capacity of 1.2 million barrels per day and transports the majority of the AIOC production. Another production export route for crude oil is the Western Route Export Pipeline, wholly owned by AIOC, with capacity to transport 145,000 barrels per day from Baku, Azerbaijan, to the marine terminal at Supsa, Georgia.
 
Chevron is the largest shareholder, with a 37 percent interest, in the West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited affiliate, which constructed, owns and operates the421-mile(678-km) West African Gas Pipeline. The pipeline is designed to supply Nigerian natural gas to customers in Benin, Ghana and Togo for industrial applications and power generation and isgeneration. Compression facilities are expected to havebe installed in the second quarter 2010 that are designed to increase capacity ofto 170 million cubic feet of natural gas per day by 2010. First gas was shipped in December 2008.day.
 
Tankers: All tankers in Chevron’s controlled seagoing fleet were utilized during 2008. In addition, at2009. At any given time during 20082009, the company had approximately 4042 deep-sea vessels chartered on a voyage basis, or for a period of less than one year. Additionally, the following table summarizes the capacity of the company’s controlled fleet.
 
Controlled Tankers at December 31, 200820091
 
                                
 U.S. Flag Foreign Flag  U.S. Flag Foreign Flag 
   Cargo Capacity
   Cargo Capacity
    Cargo Capacity
   Cargo Capacity
 
 Number (Millions of Barrels) Number (Millions of Barrels)  Number (Millions of Barrels) Number (Millions of Barrels) 
Owned  3   0.8   1   1.1   3   0.8   1   1.1 
Bareboat Chartered  2   0.7   18   27.1 
Time Chartered*   —     —     17     14.6 
Bareboat-Chartered  2   0.7   18   27.1 
Time-Chartered2
        17   12.4 
                  
Total
  5   1.5   36   42.8     5     1.5     36     40.6 
 
*1 One year or more.Consolidated companies only. Excludes tankers chartered on a voyage basis, those with dead-weight tonnage less than 25,000 and those used exclusively for storage.
2Tankers chartered for more than one year.
 
Federal law requires that cargo transported between U.S. ports be carried in ships built and registered in the United States, owned and operated by U.S. entities, and manned by U.S. crews. In 2008, theThe company’s U.S. flagU.S.-flagged fleet wasis engaged primarily in transporting refined products between the Gulf Coast and the East Coast and from California refineries to terminals on the West Coast and in Alaska and Hawaii. OneAs part of its fleet modernization program, the company has twoU.S.-flagged product tanker, capable of carrying 300,000 barrels of cargo, was deliveredtankers scheduled for delivery in 20082010 and two additionalplans to retire threeU.S.-flagged product tankers between 2010 and 2011. The new tankers are scheduled for delivery in 2010.expected to bring improved efficiencies to Chevron’sU.S.-flagged fleet.
 
The foreign-flagged vessels wereare engaged primarily in transporting crude oil from the Middle East, Asia, the Black Sea, Mexico and West Africa to ports in the United States, Europe, Australia and Asia. RefinedThe company’s foreign-flagged vessels also transport refined products were also transported by tankerto and from various locations worldwide.


27


In addition to the vessels described above, the company owns a one-sixth interest in each of seven LNGliquefied-natural-gas (LNG) tankers transporting cargoes for the North West Shelf (NWS) Venture in Australia. The NWS project also has two LNG tankers under long-term time charter. In 2008, the company sold its two LNG shipbuilding contracts with Samsung Heavy Industries, but retained the option to purchase two new LNG vessels.
 
The Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires the phase-out by year-end 2010 of all single-hull tankers trading to U.S. ports or transferring cargo in waters within the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. As of the end of 2008,2009, the company’s owned and bareboat-charteredchartered fleet was completely double-hulled. The company is a member of many oil-spill-response cooperatives in areas in which it operates around the world.
 
Chemicals
 
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem) is equally owned with ConocoPhillips Corporation. At the end of 2008,2009, CPChem owned or had joint venturejoint-venture interests in 3534 manufacturing facilities and five research and technical centers in Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea and the United States.
 
Americas Styrenics LLC, a50-50 joint venture betweenDuring 2009, CPChem and Dow Chemical Company, began commercial operations in 2008. This joint venture combined CPChem’s U.S. styrene and polystyrene operations with Dow’s U.S. and Latin America polystyrene operations. Also,completed construction continued onof the new 22 million-pound-per-yearmillion-pounds-per-year Ryton® polyphenylene-sulfide (PPS) manufacturing facility at Borger, Texas. CompletionRyton® PPS is an engineering thermoplastic used in a variety of this plant is expected in second quarter 2009.applications, including automotives and electronics.


27


Outside the United States, CPChem’s 5035 percent-owned Jubail Chevron PhillipsSaudi Polymers Company began commercial production at its world-scale styrene facility atcontinued construction during 2009 on a petrochemical project in Al Jubail, Saudi Arabia. The styrene facility is located adjacent tojoint-venture project includes an existing aromatics complex in Al Jubail that is jointly owned by CPChemolefins unit and the Saudi Industrial Investment Group. Also during 2008, construction commenced by Saudi Polymers Company, a joint venture company formed to build a third petrochemical project in Al Jubail.downstream polyethylene, polypropylene, 1-hexene and polystyrene units. Project completion is expected in 2011.
 
CPChem continued construction during 20082009 on the 49 percent-owned Q-Chem II project, located in both Mesaieed and Ras Laffan, Qatar. The project includes a 350,000-metric-ton-per-year high-density polyethylene plant and a 345,000-metric-ton-per-year normal alpha olefins plant, each utilizing CPChem proprietary technology — and istechnology. These plants are located adjacent to the existing Q-Chem I complex. The Q-Chem II project also includes a separate joint venture to develop a 1.3 million-metric-ton-per-year ethylene cracker at Qatar’sin Ras Laffan, Industrial City, in which Q-Chem II owns 54 percent of the capacity rights.Start-up for the ethylene cracker is expected in March 2010, andstart-up for the polyethylene and alpha olefins plants is anticipated in late 2009.the third quarter 2010.
 
Chevron’s Oronite brand lubricant and fuel additives business is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of performance additives for lubricating oils and fuels. The company owns and operates facilities in Brazil, France, Japan, the Netherlands, Singapore and the United States and has equity interests in facilities in India and Mexico. Oronite provideslubricant additives for lubricatingare blended into refined base oil to produce finished lubricant packages used in most engine applications, such as passenger car, heavy-duty diesel, marine, locomotive and motorcycle engines, and additives for fuels to improve engine performance and extend engine life. Oronite completed construction and started upDuring 2009, production began at the hydrofluoric acid replacement alkylation unitsdetergent expansion facility in Gonfreville, France, during 2008. Commercial production commenced in January 2009. Also during 2008,Palau Sakra, Singapore. This additional capacity enhances the Gonfreville facility began full commercial production of new sulfur-freecompany’s ability to produce detergent components for applications in marine engine applications and low-sulfur components for automotive engine oil applications.engines.
 
Other Businesses
 
Mining
 
Chevron’sU.S.-based mining company produces and markets coal and molybdenum. Sales occur in both U.S. and international markets.
 
The company owns and operates twois the operator of a surface coal mines, McKinley,mine in New Mexico, and Kemmerer, in Wyoming, and onean underground coal mine, North River, in Alabama, and a surface coal mine in McKinley, New Mexico. The company continues to actively market for sale its coal reserves at the North River Mine and elsewhere in Alabama. The decision was made in late 2009 to suspend production at the McKinley Mine, and conduct reclamation activities in 2010. The company also owns a 50 percent interest in Youngs Creek Mining Company LLC, a joint venturewhich was formed to develop a coal mine in northern Wyoming. Coal sales from wholly owned mines in 2009 were 1110 million tons, down about 1 million tons from 2007.2008.
 
At year-end 2008,2009, Chevron controlled approximately 200193 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves in the United States, including reserves of environmentally desirable low-sulfur coal. The company is contractually committed to deliver between 87 million and 119 million tons of coal per year through the end of 20102012 and believes it will satisfy these contracts from existing coal reserves.


28


In addition to the coal operations, Chevron owns and operates the Questa molybdenum mine in New Mexico. At year-end 2008,2009, Chevron controlled approximately 53 million pounds of proven molybdenum reserves at Questa.
In 2008, the company sold the petroleum coke calciner assets of Chicago Carbon Company, a wholly owned subsidiary Underground development and production plans at Questa were scaled back in Illinois. The company also sold its lanthanides processing facilities and rare-earth mineral mine2009 in Mountain Pass, California, and its 33 percent interest in Sumikin Molycorp, a manufacturer and marketer of neodymium compounds in Japan. In early 2009, the company was actively marketing its coal reserves at the North River Mine and elsewhere in Alabamaresponse to weakening prices for sale.molybdenum.
 
Power Generation
 
Chevron’s power generation business develops and operates commercial power projects and has interests in 13 power assets with a total operating capacity of more than 3,100 megawatts, primarily through joint ventures in the United States and Asia. The company manages the productionTwelve of more than 2,300 megawatts of electricity at 11 facilities it owns through joint ventures. The company operatesthese are efficient combined-cycle and gas-fired cogeneration facilities that useutilize waste heat recovery to produce additional electricity or toand support industrial thermal hosts. A numberThe thirteenth facility is a wind farm, located in Casper, Wyoming, that began operating in late 2009. The 100 percent-owned and operated Casper Wind Farm is a small-scale wind power facility designed to optimize the efficient use of a decommissioned refinery site for delivery of clean, renewable energy to the facilities produce steam for use in upstream operations to facilitate production of heavy oil.local utility provider.
 
The company has major geothermal operations in Indonesia and the Philippines and is investigating several advanced solar technologies for use in oil fieldoil-field operations as part of its renewable energyrenewable-energy strategy. For additional information on the company’s geothermal operations and renewable energy projects, refer to page 1918 and “Research and Technology”, on page 29. below.


28


 
Chevron Energy Solutions
 
Chevron Energy Solutions (CES) is a wholly owned subsidiary that providesdesigns and implements sustainable solutions for public institutions and businesses with sustainable energy projects designed to increase energy efficiency and reliability, reduce energy costs, and utilize renewable and alternative-power technologies. Since 2000, CES has developed hundreds of projects that will help government, educationgovernments, educational institutions and other customers reduce their energy costs and carbon footprint.environmental impact. Major projects completed by CES in 20082009 included several large solar paneland energy-efficiency installations in California.for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the San Jose Unified School District, which were the largest projects of their kind for a U.S. transit authority and school district.
 
Research and Technology
 
The company’s energy technology organization supports Chevron’s upstream and downstream businesses by providing technology, services and competency development in earth sciences; reservoir and production engineering; drilling and completions; facilities engineering; manufacturing; process technology; catalysis; technical computing; and health, environment and safety. The information technology organization integrates computing, telecommunications, data management, security and network technology to provide a standardized digital infrastructure and enable Chevron’s global operations and business processes.
 
Chevron Technology Ventures (CTV) manages investments and projects in emerging energy technologies and their integration into Chevron’s core businesses. As of the end of 2008,2009, CTV was investigatingcontinued to explore technologies such as next-generation biofuels and advanced solar power and enhanced geothermal.solar.
 
Chevron’s research and development expenses were $835$603 million, $562$702 million and $468$510 million for the years 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.
 
Some of the investments the company makes in the areas described above are in new or unproven technologies and business processes, and ultimate technical or commercial successes are not certain. Although not all initiatives may prove to be economically viable, theThe company’s overall investment in this area is not significant to the company’s consolidated financial position.
 
Environmental Protection
 
Virtually all aspects of the company’s businesses are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and to similar laws and regulations in other countries. These regulatory requirements continue to change and increase in both number and complexity and to govern not only the manner in which the company conducts its operations, but also the products it sells. Chevron expects more environment-related regulations in the countries where it has operations. Most of the costs of complying with the many laws and regulations pertaining to its operations are, or are expected to become, embedded in the normal costs of conducting business.
 
In 2008,2009, the company’s U.S. capitalized environmental expenditures were approximately $780$887 million, representing approximately 915 percent of the company’s total consolidated U.S. capital and exploratory expenditures. These environmental expenditures include capital outlays to retrofit existing facilities as well as those associated with new


29


facilities. The expenditures relate mostly to air- and water-quality projects and activities at the company’s refineries, oil and gas producing facilities, and marketing facilities. For 2009,2010, the company estimates U.S. capital expenditures for environmental control facilities will be approximately $1 billion.$831 million. The future annual capital costs are uncertain and will be governed by several factors, including future changes to regulatory requirements.
 
Chevron expects an increase in environment-related regulations, including those that are intended to address concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change, in the countries where it has operations. For instance, under California’s Global Warming Solutions Act enacted in 2006, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), charged with implementing the law, has adopted a new low-carbon fuel standard intended to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels, which is expected to apply beginning in 2011. Additionally, CARB is expected to propose regulations to implement the “cap and trade” emissions regulation provisions of the law, for adoption in the second half 2010. The effect of any such regulation on the company’s business is uncertain.
Refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages FS-16 through FS-18FS-17 for additional information on environmental matters and their impact on Chevron and on the company’s 20082009 environmental expenditures, remediation provisions and year-end environmental reserves. Refer also to Item 1A. Risk Factors on pages 30 through 32 for a discussion of greenhouse gas regulation and climate change.
 
Web Site Access to SEC Reports
 
The company’s Internet Web site is atwww.chevron.com. Information contained on the company’s Internet Web site is not part of this Annual Report onForm 10-K. The company’s Annual Reports onForm 10-K, Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q, Current Reports onForm 8-K and any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge on the company’s Web site soon after such reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The reports are also available at the SEC’s Web site atwww.sec.gov.


29


Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
Chevron is a major fully integrated petroleum company with a diversified business portfolio, a strong balance sheet, and a history of generating sufficient cash to fund capital and exploratory expenditures and to pay dividends. Nevertheless, some inherent risks could materially impact the company’s financial results of operations or financial condition.
 
Chevron is exposed to the effects of changing commodity prices.
 
Chevron is primarily in a commodities business with a history of price volatility. The single largest variable that affects the company’s results of operations is the price of crude oil, which can be influenced by general economic conditions and geopolitical risk.
 
During extended periods of historically low prices for crude oil, the company’s upstream earnings and capital and exploratory expenditure programs will be negatively affected. Upstream assets may also become impaired. The impact on downstream earnings is dependent upon the supply and demand for refined products and the associated margins on refined-product sales.
 
The scope of Chevron’s business will decline if the company does not successfully develop resources.
 
The company is in an extractive business; therefore, if Chevron is not successful in replacing the crude oil and natural gas it produces with good prospects for future production or through acquisitions, the company’s business will decline. Creating and maintaining an inventory of projects depends on many factors, including obtaining and renewing rights to explore, develop and produce hydrocarbons; drilling success; ability to bring long-lead-time, capital-intensive projects to completion on budget and schedule; and efficient and profitable operation of mature properties.
 
The company’s operations could be disrupted by natural or human factors.
 
Chevron operates in both urban areas and remote and sometimes inhospitable regions. The company’s operations and facilities are therefore subject to disruption from either natural or human causes, including hurricanes, floods and other forms of severe weather, war, civil unrest and other political events, fires, earthquakes, explosions and explosions,system failures, any of which could result in suspension of operations or harm to people or the natural environment.


30


Chevron’s business subjects the company to liability risks.risks from litigation or government action.
 
The company produces, transports, refines and markets materials with potential toxicity, and it purchases, handles and disposes of other potentially toxic materials in the course of the company’s business. Chevron operations also produce byproducts, which may be considered pollutants. Often these operations are conducted through joint ventures over which the company may have limited influence and control. Any of these activities could result in liability arising from private litigation or government action, either as a result of an accidental, unlawful discharge or as a result of new conclusions on the effects of the company’s operations on human health or the environment. In addition, to the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, it is possible that such liability could be imposed without regard to the company’s causation of or contribution to the asserted damage or to other mitigating factors.
 
Political instability could harm Chevron’s business.
 
The company’s operations, particularly exploration and production, can be affected by changing economic, regulatory and political environments in the various countries in which it operates. As has occurred in the past, actions could be taken by governments to increase public ownership of the company’s partially or wholly owned businessesand/or to impose additional taxes or royalties.
 
In certain locations, governments have imposed restrictions, controls and taxes, and in others, political conditions have existed that may threaten the safety of employees and the company’s continued presence in those countries. Internal unrest, acts of violence or strained relations between a government and the company or other governments may affect the company’s operations. Those developments have, at times, significantly affected the company’s related operations and results and are carefully considered by management when evaluating the level of current and future activity in such countries. At December 31, 2008, 292009, 26 percent of the company’s net proved reserves were located in Kazakhstan. The company also has significant interests in Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)-member countries including Angola, Nigeria and Venezuela and in the Partitioned Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Twenty-threeTwenty-two percent of the company’s net proved reserves, including affiliates, were located in OPEC countries at December 31, 2008 (excluding reserves in Indonesia, which relinquished its OPEC membership at the end of 2008).2009.


30


Regulation of greenhouse gas emissions could increase Chevron’s operational costs and reduce demand for Chevron’s products.
 
Management expects continuedContinued political attention to issues concerning climate change, and the role of human activity in it and potential remediation or mitigation through regulation that could materially affecthave a material impact on the company’s operations.operations and financial results.
 
International agreements and national or regional legislation and regulatory measures to limit greenhouse emissions are currently in various phasesstages of discussion or implementation. TheFor instance, the Kyoto Protocol, Australia’s proposed legislation and California’s Global Warming Solutions Act, and Australia’s proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, along with other actual or pending federal, state and provincial regulations, envision a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through market-based trading schemes.regulatory programs, technology-based or performance-based standards or a combination of them. The company is currently complying withsubject to existing greenhouse gas emissions limits withinin jurisdictions where such regulation is currently effective, including the European Union.Union and New Zealand.
 
AsIn December 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a resultfinal endangerment finding for greenhouse gases, which specifically found that emissions of thesesix greenhouse gases threaten the public health and welfare and that greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines also contribute to such pollution. These findings do not themselves impose regulatory requirements. However, the agency is currently in the process of promulgating greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty vehicles and regulations that would require certain stationary source facilities that exceed an as-yet undetermined threshold to obtain permits in advance, which permits could require implementation of so-called “best available control technologies.” In June 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the American Clean Energy and Security Act. This is known as the Waxman-Markey bill, which includes provisions for acap-and-trade program, aimed at controlling and reducing emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States. At this time it is not possible to predict whether or when the U.S. Senate may act on climate change legislation, how any bill approved by the Senate will be reconciled with the Waxman-Markey legislation or whether any federal legislation will supersede the EPA’s regulatory actions.
These and other environmentalgreenhouse gas emissions-related laws, policies and regulations, the company expects to incurmay result in substantial capital, compliance, operating maintenance and remediationmaintenance costs. The level of expenditure required to comply with these laws and regulations is uncertain and mayis expected to vary by jurisdiction depending on the laws enacted in each jurisdiction, and the company’s activities in it.it and market conditions. The company’s productionexploration and processing operations (e.g., the production of crude oil, at offshore platformsnatural gas and


31


various minerals such as coal; the upgrading of production from oil sands into synthetic oil; power generation; the conversion of crude oil and natural gas into refined products; the processing, liquefaction and regasification of natural gas at liquefiedgas; the transportation of crude oil, natural gas facilities) typically result in emission of greenhouse gases. Likewise, emissions arise from power and downstream operations, including crude oil transportation and refining. Finally, although beyond the control of the company, the use of passenger vehicle fuels and related products by consumers also resultsand consumers’ or customers’ use of the company’s products result in greenhouse gas emissions that maycould well be regulated. Some of these activities, such as consumers’ and customers’ use of the company’s products, as well as actions taken by the company’s competitors in response to such laws and regulations, are beyond the company’s control.
 
The effect of regulation on the company’s financial performance will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, the sectors covered, the greenhouse gas emissions reductions required by law, the price and availability of emission allowances and credits, the extent to which Chevron would be entitled to receive emission allowancesallowance allocations or need to purchase them incompliance instruments on the open market or through auctions, the price and availability of emission allowances and credits, and the impact of legislation or other regulation on the company’s ability to recover the costs incurred through the pricing of the company’s products. Material costprice increases or incentives to conserve or use alternative energy sources could reduce demand for products the company currently sells. Tosells and adversely affect the extent these costscompany’s sales volumes, revenues and margins.
Changes in management’s estimates and assumptions may have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements and financial or operations performance in any given period.
In preparing the company’s periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including its financial statements, Chevron’s management is required under applicable rules and regulations to make estimates and assumptions as of a specified date. These estimates and assumptions are not ultimately reflectedbased on management’s best estimates and experience as of that date and are subject to substantial risk and uncertainty. Materially different results may occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Areas requiring significant estimates and assumptions by management include measurement of benefit obligations for pension and other postretirement benefit plans; estimates of crude oil and natural gas recoverable reserves; accruals for estimated liabilities, including litigation reserves; and impairments to property, plant and equipment. Changes in estimates or assumptions or the information underlying the assumptions, such as changes in the pricecompany’s business plans, general market conditions or changes in commodity prices, could affect reported amounts of the company’s products, the company’s operating results will be adversely affected.assets, liabilities or expenses.
 
Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.
 
Item 2.    Properties
 
The location and character of the company’s crude oil, natural gas and mining properties and its refining, marketing, transportation and chemicals facilities are described on page 3 under Item 1. Business. Information required by the Securities Exchange Act Industry Guide No. 2Subpart 1200 ofRegulation S-K (“Disclosure ofby Registrants Engaged in Oil and Gas Operations”Producing Activities”) is also contained in Item 1 and in Tables I through VII on pages FS-62 to FS-74.FS-64 through FS-77. Note 13, “Properties, Plant and Equipment,” to the company’s financial statements is onpage FS-43.FS-45.
 
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings
 
EcuadorChevron is a defendant in a civil lawsuit before the Superior Court of Nueva Loja in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, brought in May 2003 by plaintiffs who claim to be representatives of certain residents of an area where an oil production consortium formerly had operations. The lawsuit alleges damage to the environment from the oil exploration and production operations, and seeks unspecified damages to fund environmental remediation and restoration of the alleged environmental harm, plus a health monitoring program. Until 1992, Texaco Petroleum Company (Texpet), a subsidiary of Texaco Inc., was a minority member of this consortium with Petroecuador, the Ecuadorian state-owned oil company, as the majority partner; since 1990, the operations have been conducted solely by Petroecuador. At the conclusion of the consortium and following an independent third-party environmental audit of the concession area, Texpet entered into a formal agreement with the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador for Texpet to remediate specific sites assigned by the government in proportion to Texpet’s ownership share of the consortium. Pursuant to that agreement, Texpet conducted a three-year remediation program at a cost of $40 million. After certifying that the sites were properly remediated, the government granted Texpet and all related corporate entities a full release from any and all environmental liability arising from the consortium operations.
 
Based on the history described above, Chevron believes that this lawsuit lacks legal or factual merit. As to matters of law, the company believes first, that the court lacks jurisdiction over Chevron; second, that the law under which plaintiffs


32


bring the action, enacted in 1999, cannot be applied retroactively to Chevron;retroactively; third, that the claims are barred by the


31


statute of limitations in Ecuador; and, fourth, that the lawsuit is also barred by the releases from liability previously given to Texpet by the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador. With regard to the facts, the company believes that the evidence confirms that Texpet’s remediation was properly conducted and that the remaining environmental damage reflects Petroecuador’s failure to timely fulfill its legal obligations and Petroecuador’s further conduct since assuming full control over the operations.
 
In April 2008, a mining engineer appointed by the court to identify and determine the cause of environmental damage, and to specify steps needed to remediate it, issued a report recommending that the court assess $8 billion, which would, according to the engineer, provide financial compensation for purported damages, including wrongful death claims, and pay for, among other items, environmental remediation, health care systems, and additional infrastructure for Petroecuador. The engineer’s report also asserted that an additional $8.3 billion could be assessed against Chevron for unjust enrichment. The engineer’s report is not binding on the court. Chevron also believes that the engineer’s work was performed and his report prepared in a manner contrary to law and in violation of the court’s orders. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the report in which it asked the court to strike the report in its entirety. In November 2008, the engineer revised the report and, without additional evidence, recommended an increase in the financial compensation for purported damages to a total of $18.9 billion and an increase in the assessment for purported unjust enrichment to a total of $8.4 billion. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the revised report, which the court dismissed. In September 2009, following the disclosure by Chevron of evidence that the judge participated in meetings in which businesspeople and individuals holding themselves out as government officials discussed the case and its likely outcome,the judge presiding over the case petitioned to be recused. In late September 2009, the judge was recused, and in October 2009, the full chamber of the provincial court affirmed the recusal, resulting in the appointment of a new judge. Chevron filed motions to annul all of the rulings made by the prior judge, but the new judge denied these motions. The court has completed most of the procedural aspects of the case and could render a judgment at any time. Chevron will continue a vigorous defense of any attempted imposition of liability.
 
In the event of an adverse judgment, Chevron would expect to pursue its appeals and vigorously defend against enforcement of any such judgment; therefore, the ultimate outcome — and any financial effect on Chevron — remains uncertain. Management does not believe an estimate of a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss) can be made in this case. Due to the defects associated with the engineer’s report, management does not believe the report itself has any utility in calculating a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss). Moreover, the highly uncertain legal environment surrounding the case provides no basis for management to estimate a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss).
 
Government Proceedings
In November 2008, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) proposed a civil penalty against the company’s Sacramento, California, terminal for alleged violations between August and December 2007 of CARB’s regulations governing the minimum concentration of additives in gasoline. Due to a computer programming error, the Sacramento terminal’s automatic dispensers had failed to inject additive detergent into a gasoline line.
In November 2008, CARB proposed a civil penalty against the company’s Richmond, California, refinery for a notice of violation relating to gasoline that was not properly certified as to composition. The company corrected the composition certificates for the gasoline without requiring any change to the composition of the gasoline. In July 2009, CARB issued the refinery a notice of violation relating to an error in gasoline blending that caused the product composition certifications to be in error. The composition certifications were corrected without requiring any change to the gasoline. Discussions with CARB officials relating to all of these matters took place in the fourth quarter 2009 and continue in 2010.
In July 2009, the Hawaii Department of Health (“DOH”) alleged that Chevron is obligated to pay stipulated civil penalties exceeding $100,000 in conjunction with commitments the company undertook to install and operate certain air pollution abatement equipment at its Hawaii Refinery pursuant to Clean Air Act settlement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and DOH. The company has disputed many of the allegations.
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
None.


3233


 
PART II
 
Item 5.    Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 5.    Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
The information on Chevron’s common stock market prices, dividends, principal exchanges on which the stock is traded and number of stockholders of record is contained in the Quarterly Results and Stock Market Data tabulations, onpage FS-24.
 
CHEVRON CORPORATION

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
                 
           Maximum
 
        Total Number of
  Number of Shares
 
  Total Number
  Average
  Shares Purchased as
  that May Yet be
 
  of Shares
  Price Paid
  Part of Publicly
  Purchased Under
 
Period
 Purchased(1)(2)  per Share  Announced Program  the Program 
 
Oct. 1 – Oct. 31, 2008  14,185,681   67.71   14,184,858    
Nov. 1 – Nov. 30, 2008  7,687,933   72.46   7,665,000    
Dec. 1 – Dec. 31, 2008  6,373,015   76.05   6,367,989    
                 
Total Oct. 1 – Dec. 31, 2008
  28,246,629   70.88   28,217,847   (2)
                 
                 
           Maximum
 
        Total Number of
  Number of Shares
 
  Total Number
  Average
  Shares Purchased as
  that May Yet be
 
  of Shares
  Price Paid
  Part of Publicly
  Purchased Under
 
Period
 Purchased(1)(2)  per Share  Announced Program  the Program(2) 
 
Oct. 1 – Oct. 31, 2009  516   75.79       
Nov. 1 – Nov. 30, 2009  2,380   78.59       
Dec. 1 – Dec. 31, 2009            
                 
Total Oct. 1 – Dec. 31, 2009
  2,896   78.09       
                 
 
(1)Includes 14,339Pertains to common shares repurchased during the three-month period ended December 31, 2008,2009, from company employees for required personal income tax withholdings on the exercise of the stock options issued to management and employees under the company’s broad-based employee stock options, long-term incentive plans and former Texaco Inc. stock option plans. Also includes 14,443 shares delivered or attested to in satisfaction of the exercise price by holders of certain former Texaco Inc. employee stock options exercised during the three-month period ended December 31, 2008. The October purchases also include approximately 14.2 million shares acquired in an exchange transaction for a U.S. upstream property and cash.2009.
 
(2)In September 2007, the company authorized stock repurchases of up to $15 billion that may be made from time to time at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other requirements and subject to market conditions and other factors. The program will occur overis authorized for a period of up to three years, expiring in September 2010, and may be discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2008,2009, 118,996,749 shares had been acquired under this program for $10.1 billion. No share repurchases occurred in 2009.
 
Item 6.    Selected Financial Data
 
The selected financial data for years 20042005 through 20082009 are presented onpage FS-61.FS-63.
 
Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data is presented onpage FS-1.
 
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
The company’s discussion of interest rate, foreign currency and commodity price market risk is contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — “Financial and Derivative Instruments,” beginning onpage FS-13FS-14 and in Note 710 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Financial and Derivative Instruments,” beginning onpage FS-36.FS-39.
 
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
The index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data is presented onpage FS-1.


3334


Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.
 
Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
 
(a)  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
The company’s management has evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRule 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.
 
(b)  Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
The company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange ActRule 13a-15(f). The company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on theInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the results of this evaluation, the company’s management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.
 
The effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report included onpage FS-26.
 
(c)  Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008,2009, there were no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Item 9B.    Other Information
 
None.


3435


 
PART III
 
Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
Executive Officers of the Registrant at February 26, 200925, 2010
 
The Executive Officers of the Corporation consist of the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman of the Board and such other officers of the Corporation who are members of the Executive Committee.
 
       
Name and Age Current and Prior Positions (up to five years) Current Areas of Responsibility
 
D.J. O’ReillyJ.S. Watson 6253 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (since 2000)2010)
 Chief Executive Officer
P.J. Robertson 62 Vice Chairman of the Board (since 2002)(2009)
Executive Vice President (2008 to 2009)
 Policy, Government
Vice President and Public Affairs; Human ResourcesPresident of Chevron
International Exploration and Production
Company (2005 through 2007)
G.L. Kirkland59
Vice Chairman of the Board and Executive
Vice President (since 2010)
Worldwide Exploration and
Production Activities and Global
Executive Vice President (2005 through 2009)
Gas Activities, including Natural
Gas Trading
J.E. Bethancourt 5758 Executive Vice President (since 2003) Technology; Chemicals; Mining; Health,
Environment and SafetySafety; Project
Resources Company; Procurement
G.L. KirklandC.A. James 5855 Executive Vice President (since 2005) President of Chevron Overseas
  Petroleum Inc. (2002 to 2004)
Worldwide Exploration and Production Activities and Global Gas Activities, including Natural Gas Trading
J.S. Watson52Executive Vice President (since 2008)2009)
Vice President and President of Chevron
International Exploration and Production  Company
  (2005 through 2007)
Vice President and Chief Financial
  Officer (2000 through 2004)General Counsel (2002 to 2009)
 Business Development, Mergers and Acquisitions, Strategic Planning, ProjectLaw; Human Resources Company, Procurement
M.K. Wirth 4849 Executive Vice President (since 2006)
President of Global Supply and Trading (2004
  (2004  to 2006)
President of Marketing, Asia, Middle East and Africa Marketing
  Business Unit (2001 to 2004)
 Global Refining, Marketing, Lubricants, and Supply and
Trading, excluding Natural
Gas TradingTrading; Chemicals
P.E. Yarrington 5253 
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  Officer (since(since 2009)
Vice President and Treasurer
  (2007 through 2008)
Vice President, Policy, Government and
  Public Affairs (2002 to 2007)
 Finance
C.A. James 54
Vice President and Treasurer (2007 through 2008)
Vice President, Policy, Government and Public
Affairs (2002 to 2007)
R.H. Pate47 Vice President and General Counsel (since 2009) Partner and Head of Global Competition Practice
  (since 2002)of Hunton & Williams LLP (2005 to 2009)
 Law
 
The information about directors required by Item 401(b)401(a) and (e) ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Election of Directors” in the Notice of the 20092010 Annual Meeting and 20092010 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant toRule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), in connection with the company’s 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2009“2010 Proxy Statement”), is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required by Item 405 ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Stock Ownership Information — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required by Item 406 ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Board Operations — Business Conduct and Ethics Code” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required byItem 407(d)(4)- and (5) ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Board Operations — Board Committee Membership and Functions” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.


35


There were no changes to the process by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors during the last fiscal year.


36


Item 11.    Executive Compensation
Item 11.    Executive Compensation
 
The information required by Item 402 ofRegulation S-K and contained under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Directors’“Director Compensation” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required by Item 407(e)(4) ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Board Operations — Board Committee Membership and Functions” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required by Item 407(e)(5) ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Board Operations — Management Compensation Committee Report” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC under the Exchange Act, the information under such caption incorporated by reference from the 20092010 Proxy Statement shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
 
Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information required by Item 403 ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Stock Ownership Information — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required by Item 201(d) ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
The information required by Item 404 ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Board Operations — Transactions with Related Persons” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
The information required by Item 407(a) ofRegulation S-K and contained under the heading “Board Operations“Election of Directors — Independence of Directors” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A and contained under the heading “Ratification of“Proposal to Ratify the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the 20092010 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report onForm 10-K.


3637


 
PART IV
 
Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
 
              (1)  Financial Statements:
 
   
  Page(s)
 
 FS-26
 FS-27
 FS-28
 FS-29
 FS-30
 FS-31
 FS-32 to FS-59FS-61
 
              (2)  Financial Statement Schedules:
 
Schedule Of Valuation And Qualifying Accounts Disclosure

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Millions of Dollars
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2009  2008  2007 
 
Employee Termination Benefits:
            
Balance at January 1 $44  $117  $28 
(Deductions from) additions to expense  (12)  (13)  106 
Payments  (19)  (60)  (17)
             
Balance at December 31
 $13  $44  $117 
             
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
            
Balance at January 1 $275  $200  $217 
Additions to expense  92   105   29 
Bad debt write-offs  (74)  (30)  (46)
             
Balance at December 31
 $293  $275  $200 
             
Deferred Income Tax Valuation Allowance:*
            
Balance at January 1 $7,535  $5,949  $4,391 
Additions to deferred income tax expense  2,204   2,599   1,894 
Reduction of deferred income tax expense  (1,818)  (1,013)  (336)
             
Balance at December 31
 $7,921  $7,535  $5,949 
             
* IncludedSee also Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning onpage 38 is Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.FS-46.
 
              (3)  Exhibits:
 
       The Exhibit Index on pagesE-1 andE-2 lists the exhibits that are filed as part of this report.


37


SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Millions of Dollars
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Employee Termination Benefits:
            
Balance at January 1 $117  $28  $91 
Additions (deductions) charged (credited) to expense  (13)  106   (21)
Payments  (60)  (17)  (42)
             
Balance at December 31
 $44  $117  $28 
             
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
            
Balance at January 1 $200  $217  $198 
Additions charged to expense  105   29   61 
Bad debt write-offs  (30)  (46)  (42)
             
Balance at December 31
 $275  $200  $217 
             
Deferred Income Tax Valuation Allowance:*
            
Balance at January 1 $5,949  $4,391  $3,249 
Additions charged to deferred income tax expense  2,599   1,894   1,700 
Deductions credited to goodwill        (77)
Deductions credited to deferred income tax expense  (1,013)  (336)  (481)
             
Balance at December 31
 $7,535  $5,949  $4,391 
             
See also Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning onpage FS-45.


38


 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 26th25th day of February, 2009.2010.
 
Chevron Corporation
 
 By 
/s/  David J. O’ReillyJohn S. Watson
David J. O’Reilly,John S. Watson, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 26th25th day of February, 2009.2010.
 
   
Principal Executive Officers
  
(and Directors) Directors
 
/s/David J. O’ReillyJohn S. Watson
David J. O’Reilly,John S. Watson, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer
 Samuel H. Armacost*
Samuel H. Armacost
   
/s/Peter J. RobertsonGeorge L. Kirkland
Peter J. Robertson,George L. Kirkland, Vice Chairman of the Board
 Linnet F. Deily*
Linnet F. Deily
   
  Robert E. Denham*
Robert E. Denham
   
  Robert J. Eaton*
Robert J. Eaton
   
Principal Financial Officer

/s/Patricia E. Yarrington
Patricia E. Yarrington, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

/s/Mark A. Humphrey
Mark A. Humphrey, Vice President and Comptroller
 
Sam Ginn*
Sam Ginn

Enrique Hernandez, Jr.*
Enrique Hernandez, Jr.

Franklyn G. Jenifer*
Franklyn G. Jenifer

Sam Nunn*
Sam Nunn
   
  Donald B. Rice*
Donald B. Rice
   
Kevin W. Sharer*
Kevin W. Sharer
*By: /s/Lydia I. Beebe
Lydia I. Beebe,
Attorney-in-Fact
Kevin W. Sharer*
Kevin W. Sharer
 Charles R. Shoemate*
Charles R. Shoemate
   
  Ronald D. Sugar*
Ronald D. Sugar
   
  Carl Ware*
Carl Ware


39


 

Financial Table of Contents

FS-2

FS-25

FS-32

FS-25
FS-32
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Note 1  FS-32
Note 2
Note 3
Note 4  FS-34
Note 3 FS-35
Note 4FS-35
Note 5  FS-36
Note 6  FS-36
Note 7  FS-36
Note 8  FS-37
Note 9
Note 10
Note 11  FS-38
Note 10 FS-40
Note 11FS-41
Note 12  FS-41
Note 13  FS-43
Note 14  FS-43
Note 15  FS-44
Note 16  FS-45
Note 17  FS-47
Note 18  FS-47
Note 19FS-48
Note 20  FS-48
Note 2120 FS-49
Note 22FS-51
Note 23FS-56
Note 24FS-58
Note 25FS-59
Note 26FS-59
Note 27FS-59
    
Five-Year Financial SummaryNote 21 FS-61
Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing ActivitiesFS-62


FS-1









FS-1



Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations



Key Financial Results
              
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 2008   2007  2006 
Net Income $23,931   $18,688  $17,138 
Per Share Amounts:             
Net Income – Basic $11.74   $8.83  $7.84 
– Diluted $11.67   $8.77  $7.80 
Dividends $2.53   $2.26  $2.01 
Sales and Other             
Operating Revenues $ 264,958   $ 214,091  $ 204,892 
Return on:             
Average Capital Employed  26.6%   23.1%  22.6%
Average Stockholders’ Equity  29.2%   25.6%  26.0%
     
              
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 2009   2008  2007 
    
Net Income Attributable to
Chevron Corporation
 10,483   23,931  18,688 
Per Share Amounts:             
Net Income Attributable to
Chevron Corporation
             
– Basic $5.26   $11.74  $8.83 
– Diluted $5.24   $11.67  $8.77 
Dividends $2.66   $2.53  $2.26 
Sales and Other
Operating Revenues
 $167,402   $264,958  $214,091 
Return on:             
Capital Employed  10.6%   26.6%  23.1%
Stockholders’ Equity  11.7%   29.2%  25.6%
    

Income

Earnings by Major Operating Area
                        
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
   
Upstream – Exploration and Production   Upstream – Exploration and Production   
United States $7,126   $4,532 $4,270  2,216   7,126 4,532 
International 14,584   10,284 8,872  8,215   14,584 10,284 
        
Total Upstream 21,710   14,816 13,142  10,431   21,710 14,816 
        
Downstream – Refining, Marketing and Transportation      
United States 1,369   966 1,938   (273)  1,369 966 
International 2,060   2,536 2,035  838   2,060 2,536 
        
Total Downstream 3,429   3,502 3,973  565   3,429 3,502 
        
Chemicals 182   396 539  409   182 396 
All Other  (1,390)   (26)  (516)  (922)   (1,390)  (26)
        
Net Income* $ 23,931   $ 18,688 $ 17,138 
Net Income Attributable to
Chevron Corporation(1),(2)
 $10,483   $23,931 $18,688 
       
  
*Includes Foreign Currency Effects: $ 862   $(352) $(219)
(1) Includes foreign currency effects:
  $   (744)  $    862  $   (352)
(2)Also referred to as “earnings” in the discussions that follow.
     Refer to the “Results of Operations” section beginning on page FS-6 for a discussion of financial results by major operating area for the three years endingended December 31, 2008.2009.

Business Environment and Outlook
Chevron is a global energy company with significant business activities in the following countries: Angola, Argentina, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Canada, Chad, China, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, France, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Myanmar, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, the Partitioned Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, the Philippines, Qatar, Republic of the Congo, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Kingdom, the United States, Venezuela and Vietnam.
     Earnings of the company depend largely on the profitability of its upstream (exploration and production) and downstream (refining, marketing and transportation) business segments. The single biggest factor that affects the results of operations for both segments is movement in the
price of crude oil. In the downstream business, crude oil is the largest cost component of refined products. The overall trend in earnings is typically less affected by results from the company’s chemicals business and other activities and invest-

ments.investments. Earnings for the company in any period may also be influenced by events or transactions that are infrequent and/ or unusual in nature.

     In recent years and through most of 2008, Chevron and the oil and gas industry at large experienced an increase in certain costs that exceeded the general trend of inflation in many areas of the world. This increase in costs affected the company’s operating expenses and capital programs for all business segments, but particularly for upstream. These cost pressures began to soften somewhat in late 2008. As the price of crude oil dropped precipitously from a record high in mid-year, the demand for some goods and services in the industry began to slacken. This cost trend is expected to continue during 2009 if crude-oil prices do not significantly rebound. (Refer to the “Upstream” section on next page for a discussion of the trend in crude-oil prices.)
     The company’s operations, especially upstream, can also be affected by changing economic, regulatory and political environments in the various countries in which it operates, including the United States. Civil unrest, acts of violence or strained relations between a government and the company or other governments may impact the company’s operations or investments. Those developments have at times significantly affected the company’s operations and results and are carefully considered by management when evaluating the level of current and future activity in such countries.
     To sustain its long-term competitive position in the upstream business, the company must develop and replenish an inventory of projects that offer adequateattractive financial returns for the investment required. Identifying promising areas for exploration, acquiring the necessary rights to explore for and to produce crude oil and natural gas, drilling successfully, and handling the many technical and operational details in a safe and cost-effective manner are all important factors in this effort. Projects often require long lead times and large capital commitments. From time to time, certain governments have sought to renegotiate contracts or impose additional costs on the company. Governments may attempt to do so in the future. The company will continue to monitor these developments, take them into account in evaluating future investment opportunities, and otherwise seek to mitigate any risks to the company’s current operations or future prospects.
     The company also continually evaluates opportunities to dispose of assets that are not expected to provide sufficient long-term value or to acquire assets or operations complementary to its asset base to help augment the company’s financial performance and growth. Refer to the “Results of Operations” section beginning on page FS-6 for discussions of net gains on asset sales during 2008.2009. Asset dispositions and restructurings may also occur in future periods and could result in significant gains or losses.

     In recent years, Chevron and the oil and gas industry at large experienced an increase in certain costs that exceeded the general trend of inflation in many areas of the world. This increase in costs affected the company’s operating expenses and capital programs for all business segments, but particularly for upstream. Softening of these cost pressures started in late 2008 and continued through most of 2009. Costs began to level out in the fourth quarter 2009. The company continues to actively manage its schedule of work,


FS-2


contracting, procurement and supply-chain activities to effectively manage costs. (Refer to the “Upstream” section below for a discussion of the trend in crude-oil prices.)
     The company has beencontinues to closely monitoringmonitor developments in the ongoing uncertainty in financial and credit markets, the rapid decline in crude-oil prices that began in the second half of 2008, and the general contractionlevel of worldwide economic activity.activity and the implications to the company of movements in prices for crude oil and natural gas. Management is taking these developments into account in the conduct of daily operations and for business planning. The company remains confident of its underlying financial strength to deal withaddress potential problemschallenges presented in this environment. (Refer also to the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section beginning on FS-11.)
     Comments related to earnings trends for the company’s major business areas are as follows:

     Upstream Earnings for the upstream segment are closely aligned with industry price levels for crude oil and natural gas. Crude-oil and natural-gas prices are subject to external

factors over which the company has no control, including product demand connected with global economic conditions, industry inventory levels, production quotas imposed by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), weather-related damage and disruptions, competing fuel prices, and regional supply interruptions or fears thereof that may be caused by military conflicts, civil unrest or political uncertainty. Moreover, any of these factors could also inhibit the company’s production capacity in an affected region. The company monitors developments closely in the countries in which it operates and holds investments, and attempts to manage risks in operating its facilities and business.

     Price levels for capital and exploratory costs and operating expenses associated with the efficient production of crude oil and natural gas can also be subject to external factors beyond the company’s control. External factors include not only the general level of inflation but also prices charged by the industry’s material- and service-providers, which can be affected by the volatility of the industry’s own supply and demand conditions for such materials and services. Capital and exploratory expenditures and operating expenses also can be affected by damages to production facilities caused by severe weather or civil unrest.

     Industry price levels for crude oil were volatile during 2008. The spot price for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, a benchmark crude, started 2008 at $96 per barrel and peaked at $147 in early July. At the end of the year, the WTI price had fallen to $45 per barrel. As of mid-February 2009, the WTI price was $38 per barrel. The collapse in price during the second half of 2008 was largely driven by a decline in the demand for crude oil that was associated with a significant weakening in world economies. The WTI price averaged $100 per barrel for the full-year 2008, compared with $72 in 2007.

     As in 2007, a wide differential in prices existed in 2008 between high-quality (i.e., high-gravity, low-sulfur) crude oils and those of lower quality (i.e., low-gravity, high-sulfur crude). The relatively lower price for the high-sulfur crudes has been associated with an ample supply and relatively lower demand due to the limited number of refineries that are able to process this lower-quality feedstock into light products (i.e., motor gasoline, jet fuel, aviation gasoline and diesel fuel). Chevron produces or shares in the production of heavy crude oil in California, Chad, Indonesia, the Partitioned Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, Venezuela and certain fields in Angola, China and the United Kingdom North Sea. (Refer to page FS-10 for the company’s average U.S. and international crude oil realizations.)
     In contrast to price movements in the global market for crude oil, price changes for natural gas in many regional markets are more closely aligned with supply-and-demand conditions in those markets. In the United States during 2008, benchmark prices at Henry Hub averaged about $9 per thousand cubic feet (MCF), compared with about $7 in 2007. At December 31, 2008, and as of mid-February 2009,



FS-3


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


the Henry Hub price was about $5.60 and $4.70 per MCF, respectively. Fluctuations in the price for natural gas in the United States are closely associated with the volumes produced in North America and the inventory in underground storage relative to customer demand. U.S. natural gas prices are also typically higher during the winter period when demand for heating is greatest.

     Certain other regions of the world in which the company operates have different supply, demand and regulatory circumstances, typically resulting in lower average sales prices for the company’s production of natural gas. (Refer to page FS-10 for the company’s average natural gas realizations for the U.S. and international regions.) Additionally, excess-supply conditions that exist in certain parts of the world cannot easily serve to mitigate the relatively higher-price conditions in the United States and other markets because of the lack of infrastructure to transport and receive liquefied natural gas.
     To help address this regional imbalance between supply and demand for natural gas, Chevron continues to invest in long-term projects in areas of excess supply to install infrastructure to produce and liquefy natural gas for transport by tanker, along with investments and commitments to regasify the product in markets where demand is strong and supplies are not as plentiful. Due to the significance of the overall investment in these long-term projects, the natural gas sales prices in the areas of excess supply (before the natural gas is transferred to a processing facility) are expected to remain below sales prices for natural gas that is produced much nearer to areas of high demand and can be transported in existing natural gas pipeline networks (as in the United States or Thailand).
businesses. Besides the impact of the fluctuation in priceprices for crude oil and natural gas, the longer-term trend in earnings for the upstream segment is also a function of other factors, including the company’s ability to find or acquire and efficiently produce crude oil and natural gas, changes in fiscal terms of contracts and changes in tax rates on income,laws and regulations.
     Price levels for capital and exploratory costs and operating expenses associated with the production of crude oil and
natural gas can also be subject to external factors beyond the company’s control. External factors include not only the general level of inflation but also commodity prices and prices charged by the industry’s material and service providers, which can be affected by the volatility of the industry’s own supply-and-demand conditions for such materials and services. Capital and exploratory expenditures and operating expenses also can be affected by damage to production facilities caused by severe weather or civil unrest.
     The chart at left shows the trend in benchmark prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil and U.S. Henry Hub natural gas. Industry price levels for crude oil continued to be volatile during 2009, with prices for WTI ranging from $34 to $81 per barrel. The WTI price averaged $62 per barrel for the full-year 2009, compared to $100 in 2008. The decline in prices from 2008 was largely associated with a weakening in global economic conditions and a reduction in the demand for crude oil and petroleum products. As of mid-February 2010, the WTI price was about $77.
     A differential in crude-oil prices exists between high-quality (high-gravity, low-sulfur) crudes and those of lower-quality
(low-gravity, high-sulfur). The amount of the differential in any period is associated with the supply of heavy crude available versus the demand that is a function of the number of refineries that are able to process this lower-quality feedstock into light products
(motor gasoline, jet fuel, aviation gasoline and diesel fuel). The differential remained narrow through 2009 as production declines in the industry have been mainly for lower-quality crudes.
     Chevron produces or shares in the production of heavy crude oil in California, Chad, Indonesia, the Partitioned Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, Venezuela and in certain fields in Angola, China and the costUnited Kingdom


FS-3


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of goods
Financial Condition and services.Results of Operations



sector of the North Sea. (See page FS-10 for the company’s average U.S. and international crude-oil realizations.)
     Chevron’sIn contrast to price movements in the global market for crude oil, price changes for natural gas in many regional markets are more closely aligned with supply-and-demand conditions in those markets. In the United States, prices at Henry Hub averaged about $3.80 per thousand cubic feet (MCF) during 2009, compared with almost $9 during 2008. At December 31, 2009, and as of
mid-February 2010, the Henry Hub spot price was about $5.70 and $5.50 per MCF, respectively. Fluctuations in the price for natural gas in the United States are closely associated with customer demand relative to the volumes produced in North America and the level of inventory in underground storage. Weaker U.S. demand in 2009 was associated with the economic slowdown.
     Certain international natural-gas markets in which the company operates have different supply, demand and regulatory circumstances, which historically have resulted in lower average sales prices for the company’s production of natural gas in these locations. Chevron continues to invest in long-term projects in these locations to install infrastructure to produce and liquefy natural gas for transport by tanker to other markets where greater demand results in higher prices. International natural-gas realizations averaged about $4.00 per MCF during 2009, compared with about $5.20 per MCF during 2008. Unlike prior years, these realizations compared favorably with those in the United States during 2009, primarily as a result of the deterioration of U.S. supply-and-demand conditions resulting from the economic slowdown. (See page FS-10 for the company’s average natural gas realizations for the U.S. and international regions.)
     The company’s worldwide net oil-equivalent production in 2008, including volumes produced from oil sands,2009 averaged 2.532.70 million barrels per day, a declineday. About one-fifth of about 90,000the company’s net oil-equivalent production in 2009 occurred in the OPEC-member countries of Angola, Nigeria and Venezuela and in the Partitioned Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. For the year 2009, the company’s net oil production was reduced by an average of 20,000 barrels per day from 2007 due mainly to the impact of higher prices on volumes recovered under certain production-sharing and variable-royalty agreements outside the United States and damage to production facilities in September 2008 causedquotas imposed by hurricanes Gustav and Ike in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to the discussion of U.S. upstream production trends in the “Results of Operations” section on page
FS-6. Refer also to the “Selected Operating Data” table on page
FS-10 for a listing of production volumes for eachOPEC. All of the three years endingimposed curtailments took place during the first half of the year. At the December 31,2009 meeting, members of OPEC supported maintaining production quotas in effect since December 2008.)

     The company estimates that oil-equivalent production in 20092010 will average approximately 2.632.73 million barrels per day. This estimate is subject to many factors and uncertainties, including additional quotas that may be imposed by OPEC, price effects on production volumes calculated under cost-recovery andvariable-royalty provisions of certain contracts, changes in fiscal terms or restrictions on the scope of company operations, delays in project startups, fluctuations in demand for natural gas in various markets, weather conditions that may shut in production, civil unrest, changing

geopolitics, or other disruptions to operations. FutureThe outlook for future production levels is also are affected by the size and number of economic investment opportunities and, for new large-scale projects, the time lag between initial exploration and the beginning of production. Most of Chevron’s upstream investment is currently being made outside the United States. Investments in upstream projects generally are madebegin well in advance of the start of the associated productioncrude-oil and natural-gas production. A significant majority of crude oil and natural gas.
     Approximately 20 percent ofChevron’s upstream investment is made outside the company’s net oil-equivalent production in 2008 occurred in the OPEC-member countries of Angola, Nigeria and Venezuela and in the Partitioned Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. (This production statistic excludes volumes produced in Indonesia, which relinquished its OPEC membership at the end of 2008.) At a meeting on December 17, 2008, OPEC announced a reduction of 4.2 million barrels per day, or 14 percent, from actual September 2008 production of 29 million barrels per day. The reduction became effective January 1, 2009. OPEC quotas did not significantly affect Chevron’s production level in 2007 or in 2008. The company’s current and future production levels could be affected by the cutbacks announced by OPEC in December 2008.United States.
     Refer to the “Results of Operations” section on pages FS-6 through FS-7 for additional discussion of the company’s upstream operations.business.

     Refer to Table V beginning on page FS-69 for a tabulation of the company’s proved net oil and gas reserves by geographic area, at the beginning of 2007 and each year-end from 2007 through 2009, and an accompanying discussion of major changes to proved reserves by geographic area for the three-year period endingDecember 31, 2009.
DownstreamEarnings for the downstream segment are closely tied to margins on the refining and marketing of products that include gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, lubricants, fuel oil and feedstocks for chemical manufacturing. Industry margins are sometimes volatile and can be affected by the global and regional
supply-and-demand balance for refined products and by changes in the price of crude oil used for refinery feedstock. Industry margins can also be influenced by refined-product inventory levels, geopolitical events, cost of materials and services, refinery maintenance programs and disruptions at refineries resulting from unplanned outages that may be due to severe weather, fires or other operational events.
     Other factors affecting profitability for downstream operations include the reliability and efficiency of the company’s refining and marketing network and the effectiveness of



FS-4


the crude-oil and product-supply functions and the economic returns on invested capital.functions. Profitability can also be affected by the volatility of tanker-charter rates for the company’s shipping operations, which are driven by the industry’s demand for crude oilcrude-oil and product tankers. Other factors beyond the company’s control include the general level of inflation and energy costs to operate the company’s refinery and distribution network.

     The company’s most significant marketing areas are the West Coast of North America, the U.S. Gulf Coast, Latin America, Asia, southern Africa and the United Kingdom. Chevron operates or has significant ownership interests in refineries in each of these areas except Latin America. Downstream earnings, especiallyThe company completed sales of marketing businesses during 2009 in certain countries in Latin America and Africa. The company plans to discontinue, by mid-2010, sales of Chevron- and Texaco-branded motor fuels in the mid-Atlantic and other eastern states, where the company sold to retail customers through approximately 1,100 stations and to commercial and industrial customers through supply arrangements. Sales in these markets


FS-4


represent approximately 8 percent of the company’s total U.S. retail fuel sales volumes. Additionally, in January 2010, the company sold the rights to the Gulf trademark in the United States were weak from mid-2007 through mid-2008 due mainly to increasing prices of crude oil usedand its territories that it had previously licensed for use in the U.S. Northeast and Puerto Rico.
     The company’s refining process thatand marketing margins in 2009 were not always fully recovered through sales prices of refined products. Margins significantly improvedgenerally weak due to challenging industry conditions, including a sharp drop in global demand reflecting the second half of 2008 as the price of crude oil declined. As part of its downstream strategy to focus on areas of market strength,economic slowdown, excess refined-product supplies and surplus refining capacity. Given these conditions, in January 2010 the company announced plans to sellits employees that high-level evaluations of Chevron’s refining and marketing businessesorganizations had been completed. These evaluations concluded that the company’s downstream organization should be restructured to improve operating efficiency and achieve sustained improvement in several countries.financial performance. Details of the restructuring will be further developed over the next three to six months and may include exits from additional markets, dispositions of assets, reductions in the number of employees and other actions, which may result in gains or losses in future periods.
     Refer to the discussion in “Operating Developments” below.
     Industry margins in the future may be volatile and are influenced by changes in the price“Results of crude oil used for refinery feedstock and by changes in the supply and demand for crude oil and refined products. The industry supply-and-demand balance can be affected by disruptions at refineries resulting from maintenance programs and unplanned outages, including weather-related disruptions; refined-product inventory levels; and geopolitical events.
     Refer toOperations” section on pages FS-7 throughand FS-8 for additional discussion of the company’s downstream operations.

     Chemicals Earnings in the petrochemicals business are closely tied to global chemical demand, industry inventory levels and plant capacity utilization. Feedstock and fuel costs, which tend to follow crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas price movements, also influence earnings in this segment.
     Refer to the “Results of Operations” section on page FS-8 for additional discussion of chemicalschemical earnings.

Operating Developments
Key operating developments and other events during 20082009 and early 20092010 included the following:

Upstream
AustraliaAngola Started production from Train 5 of the 17 percent-owned North West Shelf Venture onshore liquefied-natural-gas (LNG) facility in West Australia, increasing export capacity from about 12 million metric tons annually to more than 16 million. The company also announced plans for an LNG project that initially will have a capacity of 5 million tons per year and process natural gas from Chevron’s 100 percent-owned Wheatstone discovery located on the northwest coast of mainland Australia.
Canada  Finalized agreements with the government of Newfoundland and Labrador to develop the 27 percent-owned Hebron heavy-oil project off the eastern coast.

Indonesia  Achieved first oil at North Duri Field Area 12, which Chevron operates with a 100 percent interest. Maximum total crude-oil production of 34,000 barrels per day is expected in 2012.

Kazakhstan  Completed the second phase of a major expansion of production operations and processing facilitiesProduction began at the 50 percent-owned Tengizchevroil affiliate, increasing
     
total crude-oil production capacity from 400,000 to 540,000 barrels per day.
Middle East  Signed an agreement with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to extend to 2039 the company’s operation of the Kingdom’s 50 percent interest in oil and gas resources of the onshore area of the Partitioned Neutral Zone between the Kingdom and the state of Kuwait.
Nigeria Started production offshore at the 6839.2 percent-owned and operated Agbami Field, with total oil productionMafumeira Norte offshore project in Block 0 and the31 percent-owned and operated deepwater Tombua-Landana project in Block 14. Mafumeira Norte is expected to reach a maximum total daily production of 250,00042,000 barrels per day byof crude oil in the end of 2009. The companythird quarter 2010, and partners also announced plans to develop the 30 percent-owned and partner-operated offshore Usan Field, whichTombua-Landana project is expected to havereach its maximum total production of 180,000approximately 100,000 barrels of crude oil per day within one yearin 2011. The company also discovered crude oil offshore in the 39.2 percent-owned and operated Block 0 concession, extending a trend of start-upearlier discoveries in 2012.the Greater Vanza/Longui Area.
Australia The company and its partners reached final investment decision to proceed with the development of the Gorgon Project, located offshore Western Australia, in which Chevron has a 47.3 percent-owned and operated interest as of December 31, 2009. In addition, the company finalized long-term sales agreements for delivery of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Gorgon Project with four Asian customers, three of which also acquired an ownership interest in the project. Nonbinding Heads of Agreement (HOAs) with three additional Asian customers were also signed in late 2009 and
early 2010 for delivery of LNG from the project. Negotiations continue to finalize binding sales agreements, which would bring LNG delivery commitments to a combined total of about 90 percent of Chevron’s share of LNG from the project.
     The company awarded front-end engineering and design contracts for the first phase of the Wheatstone natural gas project, also located offshore northwest Australia. The 75 percent-owned and
operated facilities will have LNG processing capacity of 8.6 million metric tons per year and a
co-located domestic natural-gas plant. The facilities will support development of Chevron’s interests in the Wheatstone Field and nearby Iago Field. Agreements were signed with two companies to join the Wheatstone Project as combined 25 percent owners and suppliers of natural gas for the project’s first two LNG trains. In addition, nonbinding HOAs were signed with two Asian customers to take delivery of 4.9 million metric tons per year of LNG from the project (about 60 percent of the total LNG available from the foundation project) and to acquire a 16.8 percent equity interest in the Wheatstone Field licenses and a 12.6 percent interest in the foundation natural gas processing facilities at the final investment decision.
     In May 2009 the company announced the successful
completion of a well at the Clio prospect to further explore and appraise the 66.7 percent-owned Block WA-205-P. In 2009 and early 2010, the company also announced natural-gas discoveries at the Kentish Knock prospect in the 50 percent-owned Block WA-365-P, the Achilles and Satyr prospects in the 50 percent-owned Block WA-374-P and the Yellowglen prospect in the 50 percent-owned WA-268-P Block. All prospects are Chevron-operated. Proved reserves have not been recognized for these discoveries.
Brazil Production started at the 51.7 percent-owned and operated deepwater Frade Field, which is projected to attain maximum total production of 72,000 oil-equivalent barrels per day in 2011. Also, in early 2010 a final investment decision was reached to develop the 37.5 percent-owned, partner-operated Papa-Terra Field, where first production is expected in 2013. Project facilities are designed with a capacity to handle up to 140,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
     Republic of the Congo Confirmed startupCrude oil was discovered in the northern portion of the 3231.5 percent-owned, partner-operated Moho-Bilondo deepwater project, which is expected to reach maximum total crude-oil productionpermit area. This discovery follows two others made in 2007 in the same permit area.


FS-5


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of 90,000 barrels per day in 2010.
Financial Condition and Results of Operations



     ThailandVenezuela Approved constructionIn February 2010, a Chevron-led consortium was named the operator of a heavy-oil project composed of three blocks in the GulfOrinoco Oil Belt of Thailand of the 70 percent-owned and operated Platong Gas II project, which is designed to have processing capacity of 420 million cubic feet of natural gas per day.eastern Venezuela.
     United States Began productionFirst oil was achieved at the 7558 percent-owned and operated Blind Faith projectTahiti Field in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, reaching maximum total production of 135,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day. The company also discovered crude oil at the Chevron-operated and 55 percent-owned Buckskin prospect in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Total volumes are expectedThe first appraisal well is scheduled to ramp upbegin drilling in the second quarter 2010.
Downstream
The company sold businesses during 2009 to approximately 65,000 barrels of crude oil and 55 million cubic feet of natural gas per day.

Downstream

The company announced plans to sell marketing-related businesses in Brazil, Haiti, Nigeria, Benin, Cameroon, Republic of the Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, Kenya, Uganda, India, Italy, Peru and Uganda.Chile.

Other


FS-5


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Other

Common Stock Dividends Increased theThe quarterly common stock dividend increased by 12.14.6 percent in April 2008July 2009, to $0.65$0.68 per share. 20082009 was the 21st22nd consecutive year that the company increased its annual dividend payment.
     Common Stock Repurchase Program Acquired $8.0 billion of commonThe company did not acquire any shares in 2008 as part of aduring 2009 under its $15 billion repurchase program, initiatedwhich began in 2007.2007 and expires in September 2010. As of December 31, 2009, 119 million common shares had been acquired under this program for $10.1 billion.

Results of Operations
Major Operating Areas The following section presents the results of operations for the company’s business segments – upstream, downstream and chemicals – as well as for “all other,” which includes mining, power generation businesses, the various companies and departments that are managed at the corporate level, and the company’s investment in Dynegy prior to its sale in May 2007. Income isEarnings are also presented for the U.S. and international geographic areas of the upstream and downstream business segments. (Refer to Note 9,11, beginning on page FS-38,FS-40, for a discussion of the company’s “reportable segments,” as defined in Financial Accountingaccounting standards for segment reporting (Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 131,Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.Codification (ASC) 280)). This section should also be read in conjunction with the discussion in “Business Environment and Outlook” on pages FS-2 through FS-5.

U.S. Upstream – Exploration and Production
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Income
 $ 7,126   $ 4,532 $ 4,270 
Earnings
 $  2,216   $  7,126 $  4,532 
       

     U.S upstream earnings of $2.2 billion in 2009 decreased $4.9 billion from 2008. Lower prices for crude oil and natural gas reduced earnings by about $5.2 billion between periods, and gains on asset sales declined by approximately $900 million. Partially offsetting these effects was a benefit of about $1.3 billion resulting from an increase in net oil-equivalent production. An approximate $600 million benefit to income from lower operating expenses was more than offset by higher depreciation expense. The benefit from
lower operating expenses was largely associated with absence of charges for damages related to the 2008 hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.
     U.S upstream earnings of $7.1 billion in 2008 increased $2.6 billion from 2007. Higher average prices for crude oil and natural gas increased earnings by $3.1 billion between periods. Also contributing to the higher earnings were gains of approximately $1 billion on asset sales, including a $600 million gain on an
asset-exchange transaction. Partially offsetting these benefits were adverse effects of about $1.6 billion associated with loweroil-equivalent production and higher operating expenses, which included approximately $400 million of expenses resulting from damage to facilities in the Gulf of Mexico caused by hurricanes Gustav and Ike in September.
     Income of $4.5 billion in 2007 increased approximately $260 million from 2006. Results in 2007 benefited approximately $700 million from higher prices for crude oil and natural gas liquids. This benefit to income was partially offset by the effects of a decline in oil-equivalent production and an increase in depreciation, operating and exploration expenses.hurricanes.
     The company’s average realization for crude oil and natural gas liquids in 20082009 was $88.43$54.36 per barrel, compared with $88.43 in 2008 and $63.16 in 2007 and $56.66 in 2006.2007. The average natural gasnatural-gas realization was $7.90$3.73 per thousand cubic feet in 2008,2009, compared with $7.90 and $6.12 in 2008 and $6.29 in 2007, and 2006, respectively.


FS-6


     Net oil-equivalent production in 20082009 averaged 671,000717,000 barrels per day, down 9.7 percent and 12.1up 6.9 percent from 20072008 and 2006, respectively.down 3.5 percent from 2007. The increase between 2008 and 2009 was mainly due to the start-up of the Blind Faith Field in late 2008 and the Tahiti Field in the second quarter 2009. The decrease between 2007 and 2008 was mainly due to normal field declines and the adverse impact of the hurricanes. The decline in 2007 from 2006 was due primarily to normal field declines. The net liquids component of oil-equivalent production for 20082009 averaged 421,000484,000 barrels per day, downup approximately 815 percent from 20072008 and down 95 percent compared with 2006.2007. Net natural gasnatural-gas production averaged 1.51.4 billion cubic feet per day in 2008,2009, down 12approximately 7 percent from 20072008 and down 17about 18 percent from 2006.2007.
     Refer to the “Selected Operating Data” table on page FS-10 for the three-year comparative production volumes in the United States.

International Upstream – Exploration and Production

              
Millions of dollars 2008   2007  2006 
     
Income*
 $ 14,584   $ 10,284  $ 8,872 
     
*Includes Foreign Currency Effects:  $ 873    $ (417)  $ (371)
              
Millions of dollars 2009   2008  2007 
    
Earnings*
 $  8,215   $  14,584  $  10,284 
    
    
*Includes foreign currency effects: $  (571)   $   873   $  (417

     International upstream earnings of $8.2 billion in 2009 decreased $6.4 billion from 2008. Lower prices for crude oil and natural gas reduced earnings by $7.0 billion, while foreign-currency effects and higher operating and depreciation expenses decreased income by a total of $2.2 billion. Partially offsetting these items were benefits of $2.3 billion resulting from an increase in sales volumes of crude oil and about $500 million associated with asset sales and tax items related to the Gorgon Project in Australia.
     Earnings of $14.6 billion in 2008 increased $4.3 billion from 2007. Higher prices for crude oil and natural gas increased earnings by $4.9 billion. Partially offsetting the benefit of higher prices was an impact of about $1.8 billion associated with a reduction of
crude-oil sales volumes due to timing of certain cargo liftings and higher depreciation and operating expenses. Foreign currencyForeign-currency effects benefited earnings by $873 million in 2008, compared with reductionsa reduction to earnings of $417 million in 2007 and $371 million in 2006.

2007.


FS-6


     Income in 2007 of $10.3 billion increased $1.4 billion from 2006. Earnings in 2007 benefited approximately $1.6 billion from higher prices, primarily for crude oil, and $300 million from increased liftings. Non-recurring income-tax items also benefited earnings between periods. These benefits to income were partially offset by the impact of higher operating and depreciation expenses.

     The company’s average realization for crude oil and natural gas liquids in 20082009 was $86.51$55.97 per barrel, compared with $86.51 in 2008 and $65.01 in 2007 and $57.65 in 2006.2007. The average natural gasnatural-gas realization was $5.19$4.01 per thousand cubic feet in 2008,2009, compared with $5.19 and $3.90 in 2008 and $3.73 in 2007, and 2006, respectively.
     Net oil-equivalent production of 1.861.99 million barrels per day in 2008 declined2009 increased about 17 percent and 26 percent from 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The volumes for each year included production from oil sands in Canada. Volumes in 2006 also included production under an operating service agreement in Venezuela until its conversion to a joint-stock company in October of that year. Absent the impact of higher prices on certain production-sharing and variable-royalty agreements, net
oil-equivalent production increased between 20074 percent in 2009 and 2008. The decline3 percent in 2007 from 2006 was associated2008, when compared with the impact of the contract conversion in Venezuela and the impact of higher prices on production-sharing agreements.prior years’ production.
     The net liquids component of oil-equivalent production was 1.31.4 million barrels per day in 2009, an increase of approximately 11 percent from 2008 a decrease ofand 5 percent from 2007 and 9 percent from 2006.
2007. Net natural gasnatural-gas production of 3.6 billion cubic feet per day in 20082009 was up 9down 1 percent and 15up 8 percent from 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.
     Refer to the “Selected Operating Data” table, on page FS-10, for the three-year comparative of international production volumes.

U.S. Downstream – Refining, Marketing and Transportation
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Income
 $ 1,369   $ 966 $ 1,938 
Earnings
 $  (273)  $  1,369 $  966 
       

     U.S downstream operations lost $273 million in 2009, an earnings decrease of approximately $1.6 billion from 2008. A decline in refined product margins resulted in a negative earnings variance of $1.7 billion. Partially offsetting were lower operating expenses, which benefited earnings by $300 million. Earnings of $1.4 billion in 2008 increased about $400 million from 2007 due mainly to improved
margins on the sale of refined products and gains on derivative commodity instruments. Operating expenses were higher between periods. Income2007 and 2008.
     Sales volumes of $966refined products were 1.40 million barrels per day in 2007 decreased nearly $1 billion2009, a decrease of 1 percent from 2006.2008. The decline was associated mainly with lower refined-product marginsreduced demand for jet fuel and higher planned and unplanned refinery downtime than a year earlier. Operating expenses were also higherfuel oil, principally associated with the downturn in 2007 than in 2006.
the U.S. economy. Sales volumes of refined products were 1.41 million barrels per day in 2008, a decrease of 3 percent from 2007. The decline was associated with reduced sales of gasoline and fuel oil. Sales volumes of refined products were 1.46 million barrels per day in 2007, a decrease of 3 percent from 2006. The reported sales volume for 2007 was on a different basis than 2006 due to a change in accounting rules that became effective April 1, 2006, for certain purchase-and-sale (buy/ sell) contracts with the same counterparty. Excluding the

impact of this accounting standard, refined-product sales in 2007 decreased 1 percent from 2006. Branded gasoline sales volumes of 601,000617,000 barrels per day in 2008 was down2009 were up about 43 percent and down 2 percent from 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.
     Refer to the “Selected Operating Data” table on page FS-10 for a three-year comparativecomparison of sales volumes of gasoline and other refined products and refinery-input volumes. Refer also to Note 14, “Accounting for Buy/Sell Contracts,” on page FS-43 for a discussion


FS-7


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the accounting for purchase-and-sale contracts with the same counterparty.
Financial Condition and Results of Operations



International Downstream – Refining, Marketing and Transportation
              
Millions of dollars 2008   2007  2006 
     
Income*
 $ 2,060   $ 2,536  $ 2,035 
     
*Includes Foreign Currency Effects:  $ 193    $ 62   $ 98 
              
Millions of dollars 2009   2008  2007 
    
Earnings*
 $  838   $  2,060  $  2,536 
    
*Includes foreign currency effects:  $  (213)   $   193   $   62 

     International downstream incomeearnings of $2.1$838 million in 2009 decreased about $1.2 billion in 2008 decreased nearly $500 million from 2007. Earnings in 2007 included gains of approximately $12008. An approximate $2.6 billion on the sale of assets, which included an interest in a refinery and marketing assets in the Benelux region of Europe. The $500 million improvement otherwisedecline between yearsperiods was associated primarily with a benefit from gains on derivative commodity instruments that was only partially offset by the impact of lowerweaker margins on the sale of gasoline and other refined products and the absence
of gains recorded in 2008 on commodity derivative instruments. Foreign-currency effects produced a negative variance of $400 million. Partially offsetting these items was a $1.0 billion benefit from lower operating expenses associated mainly with contract labor, professional services and transportation costs and about a $550 million increase in gains on asset sales primarily in certain countries in Latin America and Africa. Earnings in 2008 of $2.1 billion decreased nearly $500 million from 2007. Earnings in 2007 included gains of approximately $1 billion on the sale of assets, which included marketing assets in the Benelux region of Europe and an interest in a refinery. The $500 million other improvement between years was associated primarily with a benefit from gains on derivative commodity instruments that was only partially offset by the impact of lower margins from sales of
refined products. Foreign currencyForeign-currency effects increased earnings by $193 million in 2008, compared with $62 million in 2007. Income
     Refined-product sales volumes were 1.85 million barrels per day in 2007 of $2.5 billion increased $500 million from 2006, largely2009, about 8 percent lower than in 2008 due mainly to the gains oneffects of asset sales. Margins on the sale of refined products in 2007 were up slightly from 2006. Operating expenses were higher,sales and earnings from the company’s shipping operations were lower.



FS-7


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


lower demand. Refined-product sales volumes were 2.02 million barrels per day in 2008, about 1 percent lower than 2007 due mainly to reduced sales of gas oil and fuel oil. Refined product sales volumes were 2.03 million barrels per day in 2007, about 5 percent lower than 2006. The decline in 2007 was largely due to the impact of asset sales and the accounting-standard change for buy/sell contracts. Excluding the accounting change, sales decreased about 4 percent.level with 2007.

     Refer to the “Selected Operating Data” table, on page FS-10, for a three-year comparativecomparison of sales volumes of gasoline and other refined products and refinery-input volumes. Refer also to Note 14, “Accounting for Buy/Sell Contracts,” on page FS-43 for a discussion of the accounting for purchase-and-sale contracts with the same counterparty.


Chemicals
              
Millions of dollars 2008   2007  2006 
     
Income*
 $182   $396  $539 
     
*Includes Foreign Currency Effects:  $ (18)   $ (3)  $ (8)
              
Millions of dollars 2009   2008  2007 
    
Earnings*
 $  409   $  182  $  396 
    
*Includes foreign currency effects:  $  15    $  (18)  $  (3)

     The chemicals segment includes the company’s Oronite subsidiary and the 50 percent-owned Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem). In 2008,2009, earnings were $182$409 million, compared with $182 million and $396 million and $539 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Earnings declined in 2008 due to lower sales volumes of commodity chemicals by CPChem. Higher expenses for planned maintenance activities also contributed to the earnings decline. Earnings also declined for the company’s Oronite subsidiary due to lower volumes and higher operating expenses. In 2007, earnings of $396 million decreased $143 million from 2006 due to the impact of lower margins on the sale of commodity chemicals by CPChem that were only partially offset by improved margins on Oronite’s sales of additives for lubricants and fuel.

and 2007, respectively. For CPChem, the earnings improvement from 2008 to 2009 reflected lower utility and manufacturing costs as well as the absence of an impairment recorded in 2008. These benefits were partially offset by lower margins on the sale of commodity chemicals. For Oronite, earnings increased in 2009 due to higher margins on sales of lubricant and fuel additives, the effect of which more than offset the impact of lower sales volumes. In 2008, segment earnings were $182 million, compared with $396 million in 2007. Earnings declined in 2008 due to lower sales volumes of commodity chemicals by CPChem. Higher expenses for planned maintenance activities also contributed to the earnings decline. Earnings also declined for Oronite due to lower volumes and higher operating expenses.

All Other
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Net Charges*
 $ (1,390)  $ (26) $ (516) $  (922)  $  (1,390) $  (26)
      
*Includes Foreign Currency Effects:  $ (186)  $ 6  $ 62 
*Includes foreign currency effects:  $  25  $  (186)  $   6 

     All Other includes mining operations, power generation businesses, worldwide cash management and debt financing activities, corporate administrative functions, insurance operations, real estate activities, alternative fuels and technology companies, and the company’s interest in Dynegy, Inc. prior to its sale in May 2007.

     Net charges in 2009 decreased $468 million from 2008 due to lower provisions for environmental remediation at sites


FS-8


that previously had been closed or sold, favorable foreign-currency effects and lower expenses for employee compensation and benefits. Net charges in 2008 increased $1.4 billion from 2007. Results in 2008 included net unfavorable corporate tax items and increased costs of environmental remediation. Foreign-currency effects also contributed to the increase in net charges from 2007 to 2008. Results in 2007 included a $680 million gain on the sale of the company’s investment in Dynegy common stock and a loss of approximately $175 million associated with the early redemption of Texaco Capital Inc. bonds. Results in 2008 included net unfavorable


corporate tax items and increased costs of environmental remediation for sites that previously had been closed or sold. Foreign exchange effects also contributed to the increase in net charges between years. Net charges of $26 million in 2007 decreased $490 million from 2006 due mainly to the Dynegy-related gain in 2007.

Consolidated Statement of Income
Comparative amounts for certain income statement categories are shown below:
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Sales and other operating revenues
 $ 264,958   $ 214,091 $ 204,892  167,402   264,958 214,091 
       

     Sales and other operating revenues increaseddecreased in the comparative periods2009, due mainly to higherlower prices for crude oil, natural gas and refined products. Higher 2008 prices resulted in increased revenues compared with 2007.
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Income from equity affiliates
 $ 5,366   $ 4,144 $ 4,255  3,316   5,366 4,144 
       



FS-8


     Income from equity affiliates decreased in 2009 from 2008. Upstream-related affiliate income declined about $1.3 billion mainly due to lower earnings for Tengizchevroil (TCO) in Kazakhstan as a result of lower prices for crude oil. Downstream-related affiliate earnings were lower by approximately $1.0 billion primarily due to weaker margins and an unfavorable swing in foreign-currency effects. Income from equity affiliates increased in 2008 from 2007 onlargely due to improved upstream-related earnings at Tengizchevroil (TCO) due toTCO as a result of higher prices for crude oil. Lower income from equity affiliates between 2006 and 2007 was mainly due to a decline in earnings from CPChem, Dynegy (sold in May 2007) and downstream affiliates in the Asia-Pacific area. Partially offsetting these declines were improved results for TCO and income for a full year from Petroboscan, which was converted from an operating service agreement to a joint-stock company in October 2006. Refer to Note 12, beginning on page FS-41,FS-43, for a discussion of Chevron’s investments in affiliated companies.
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Other income
 $ 2,681   $ 2,669 $ 971  918   2,681 2,669 
      

     Other income of $2.7 billion$918 million in 20082009 included gains of approximately $1.3 billion on asset sales. Other income of $2.7 billion in 2008 and 2007 included net gains of $1.7 billion from asset sales of $1.3 billion and a loss of $245 million on the early redemption of debt.$1.7 billion, respectively. Interest income was approximately $95 million in 2009, $340 million in 2008 and $600 million in both 2007 and 2006. Foreign currency2007. Foreign-currency effects benefitedreduced other income by $466 million in 2009 while increasing other income by $355 million in 2008 whileand reducing other income by $352 million and $260in 2007. In addition, other income in 2008 included approximately $700 million in 2007favorable settlements and 2006, respectively.other items.
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Purchased crude oil and products
 $ 171,397   $ 133,309 $ 128,151  99,653   171,397 133,309 
      

     Crude oil and product purchases in 2009 decreased $71.7 billion from 2008 due to lower prices for crude oil, natural gas and refined products. Crude oil and product purchases in 2008 increased $38.1 billion from 2007 due to higher prices for crude oil, natural gas and refined products. Crude oil and product purchases in 2007 increased more than $5 billion from 2006 due to these same factors.
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses
 $ 26,551   $ 22,858 $ 19,717  22,384   26,551 22,858 
      

     Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses in 2009 decreased approximately $4.2 billion from 2008 increased approximatelyprimarily due to $1.4 billion of lower fuel and transportation expenses; $800 million of decreased costs for contract labor and professional services; absence of uninsured 2008 hurricane-related charges of $700 million; a decrease of about $500 million for environmental remediation activities; $200 million of lower costs for materials; and $600 million for other items. Total expenses for 2008 were about $3.7 billion fromhigher than 2007 primarily due to $1.2 billion of higher costs for employee and contract labor; $800labor and professional services; $600 million of increased costs for materials, services and equipment;transportation expenses; $700 million of uninsured losses associated with hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico in 2008; and an increase of about $300 million for environmental remediation activities. Totalactivities; $200 million from higher material expenses; and $700 million from increases for other items.
              
Millions of dollars 2009   2008  2007 
    
Exploration expense
 1,342   1,169  1,323 
    
     Exploration expenses were about $3.1 billionin 2009 increased from 2008 due mainly to higher amounts for well write-offs in 2007 than in 2006. Increases were recorded in a number of categories, including $1.5 billion of higher costs for employeethe United States and contract labor.
              
Millions of dollars 2008   2007  2006 
    
Exploration expense
 $ 1,169   $ 1,323  $ 1,364 
    

     Exploration expensesinternational operations. Expenses in 2008 declined from 2007 mainly due mainly to lower amounts for well write-offs for operations in the United States. Expenses in 2007 were essentially unchanged from 2006.

              
Millions of dollars 2009   2008  2007 
    
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 12,110   9,528  8,708 
    
              
Millions of dollars 2008   2007  2006 
    
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 $ 9,528   $ 8,708  $ 7,506 
    

     Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses increased in 2009 from 2008 due to incremental production related to start-ups for upstream projects in the United States and Africa and higher depreciation rates for certain other oil and gas producing fields. The increase in 2008 from 2007 was largely due to higher depreciation rates for certain crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas producing fields, reflecting completion of higher-cost development projects and asset-retirement obligations. The increase between 2006 and 2007 reflects an increase in charges related to asset write-downs and higher depreciation rates for certain crude oil and natural gas producing fields worldwide.

                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Taxes other than on income
 $ 21,303   $ 22,266 $ 20,883  17,591   21,303 22,266 
      

     Taxes other than on income decreased betweenin 2009 from 2008 mainly due to lower import duties for the company’s downstream operations in the United Kingdom. Taxes other than on income decreased in 2008 from 2007 and 2008 periods mainly due to lower import duties as a result of the effects of the 2007 sales


FS-9


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations



of the company’s Benelux refining and marketing businesses and a decline in import volumes in the United Kingdom. Taxes other than on income increased between 2006 and 2007 due to higher import duties in the company’s U.K. downstream operations in 2007.
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Interest and debt expense
 $   $166 $451  $   28    166 
      

     Interest and debt expense increased in 2009 due to an increase in long-term debt. Interest and debt expense decreased significantly in 2008 because all interest-related amounts were being capitalized. Interest and debt expense in 2007 decreased from 2006 primarily due to lower average debt balances and higher amounts of interest capitalized.
                         
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Income tax expense
 $ 19,026   $ 13,479 $ 14,838  7,965   19,026 13,479 
      

     Effective income tax rates were 43 percent in 2009, 44 percent in 2008 and 42 percent in 20072007. The rate was lower in 2009 than in 2008 mainly due the effect in 2009 of deferred tax benefits and 46 percentrelatively low tax rates on asset sales, both related to an international upstream project. In addition, a greater proportion of before-tax income was earned in 2006. Rates were2009 by equity affiliates than in 2008. (Equity-affiliate income is reported as a single amount on an
after-tax basis on the Consolidated Statement of Income.) Partially offsetting these items was the effect of a greater proportion of income earned in 2009 in tax jurisdictions with higher betweentax rates. The rate was higher in 2008 compared with 2007 and 2008 primarily due to a greater proportion of income earned in tax jurisdictions with higher income tax rates. In addition, the 2007 period included a relatively low effective tax rate on the sale of the company’s investment in Dynegy common stock and the sale of downstream assets in Europe. Rates were lower in 2007 compared with 2006 due mainly to the impact of nonrecurring items in 2007 mentioned above and the absence of 2006 charges related to a tax-law change that increased tax rates on upstream operations in the U.K. North Sea and the settlement of a tax claim in Venezuela. Refer also to the discussion of income taxes in Note 1615 beginning on page FS-45.

FS-46.
Selected Operating Data1,2
              
  2009   2008  2007 
    
U.S. Upstream
             
Net Crude Oil and Natural Gas             
Liquids Production (MBPD)  484    421   460 
Net Natural Gas Production (MMCFPD)3
  1,399    1,501   1,699 
Net Oil-Equivalent Production (MBOEPD)  717    671   743 
Sales of Natural Gas (MMCFPD)  5,901    7,226   7,624 
Sales of Natural Gas Liquids (MBPD)  17    15   25 
Revenues From Net Production             
Liquids ($/Bbl) $54.36   $88.43  $63.16 
Natural Gas ($/MCF) $3.73   $7.90  $6.12 
              
International Upstream
             
Net Crude Oil and Natural Gas             
Liquids Production (MBPD)  1,362    1,228   1,296 
Net Natural Gas Production (MMCFPD)3
  3,590    3,624   3,320 
Net Oil-Equivalent             
Production (MBOEPD)4
  1,987    1,859   1,876 
Sales of Natural Gas (MMCFPD)  4,062    4,215   3,792 
Sales of Natural Gas Liquids (MBPD)  23    17   22 
Revenues From Liftings             
Liquids ($/Bbl) $55.97   $86.51  $65.01 
Natural Gas ($/MCF) $4.01   $5.19  $3.90 
              
Worldwide Upstream
             
Net Oil-Equivalent Production
(MBOEPD)3,4
             
United States  717    671   743 
International  1,987    1,859   1,876 
      
Total  2,704    2,530   2,619 
              
U.S. Downstream
             
Gasoline Sales (MBPD)5
  720    692   728 
Other Refined-Product Sales (MBPD)  683    721   729 
      
Total Refined Product Sales (MBPD)  1,403    1,413   1,457 
Sales of Natural Gas Liquids (MBPD)  144    144   135 
Refinery Input (MBPD)  899    891   812 
              
International Downstream
             
Gasoline Sales (MBPD)5
  555    589   581 
Other Refined-Product Sales (MBPD)  1,296    1,427   1,446 
      
Total Refined Product Sales (MBPD)6
  1,851    2,016   2,027 
Sales of Natural Gas Liquids (MBPD)  88    97   96 
Refinery Input (MBPD)  979    967   1,021 
    
1Includes company share of equity affiliates.
2MBPD – thousands of barrels per day; MMCFPD – millions of cubic feet per day;MBOEPD – thousands of barrels of oil-equivalents per day; Bbl – Barrel; MCF = Thousands of cubic feet. Oil-equivalent gas (OEG) conversion ratio is 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas = 1 barrel of oil.
3Includes natural gas consumed in operations (MMCFPD):
United States  58   70   65 
International  463   450   433 
4  Includes production from oil sands, Net (MBPD):
  26   27   27 
5  Includes branded and unbranded gasoline.
            
6  Includes sales of affiliates (MBPD):
  516   512   492 


FS-9FS-10


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Selected Operating Data1,2

              
  2008   2007  2006 
    
U.S. Upstream
             
Net Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids Production (MBPD)  421    460   462 
Net Natural Gas Production (MMCFPD)3
  1,501    1,699   1,810 
Net Oil-Equivalent Production (MBOEPD)  671    743   763 
Sales of Natural Gas (MMCFPD)  7,226    7,624   7,051 
Sales of Natural Gas Liquids (MBPD)  159    160   124 
Revenues From Net Production             
Liquids ($/Bbl) $ 88.43   $ 63.16  $ 56.66 
Natural Gas ($/MCF) $7.90   $6.12  $6.29 
              
International Upstream
             
Net Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids Production (MBPD)  1,228    1,296   1,270 
Net Natural Gas Production (MMCFPD)3
  3,624    3,320   3,146 
Net Oil-Equivalent Production (MBOEPD)4
  1,859    1,876   1,904 
Sales Natural Gas (MMCFPD)  4,215    3,792   3,478 
Sales Natural Gas Liquids (MBPD)  114    118   102 
Revenues From Liftings             
Liquids ($/Bbl) $86.51   $65.01  $57.65 
Natural Gas ($/MCF) $5.19   $3.90  $3.73 
              
Worldwide Upstream
             
Net Oil-Equivalent Production (MBOEPD)3,4
             
United States  671    743   763 
International  1,859    1,876   1,904 
      
Total  2,530    2,619   2,667 
              
U.S. Downstream
             
Gasoline Sales (MBPD)5
  692    728   712 
Other Refined-Product Sales (MBPD)  721    729   782 
      
Total (MBPD)6
  1,413    1,457   1,494 
Refinery Input (MBPD)  891    812   939 
              
International Downstream
             
Gasoline Sales (MBPD)5
  589    581   595 
Other Refined-Product Sales (MBPD)  1,427    1,446   1,532 
      
Total (MBPD)6, 7
  2,016    2,027   2,127 
Refinery Input (MBPD)  967    1,021   1,050 
    
             
1 Includes interest in affiliates.
2 MBPD = Thousands of barrels per day; MMCFPD = Millions of cubic feet per day;
   MBOEPD = Thousands of barrels of oil-equivalents per day; Bbl = Barrel;
   MCF = Thousands of cubic feet. Oil-equivalent gas (OEG) conversion ratio is 6,000 cubic feet
   of gas = 1 barrel of oil.
3 Includes natural gas consumed in operations (MMCFPD):
          United States  70   65   56 
          International  450   433   419 
4 Includes other produced volumes (MBPD):
            
          Athabasca Oil Sands – Net  27   27   27 
          Boscan Operating Service Agreement        82 
   
   27   27   109 
5 Includes branded and unbranded gasoline.
6 Includes volumes for buy/sell contracts (MBPD):
          United States        26 
          International        24 
7 Includes sales of affiliates (MBPD):  512   492   492 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities Total balances were $9.6$8.8 billion and $8.1$9.6 billion at December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities in 20082009 was $29.6$19.4 billion, compared with $29.6 billion in 2008 and $25.0 billion in 2007 and $24.3 billion in 2006.2007.
Cash provided by operating activities was net of contributions to employee pension plans of approximately $1.7 billion, $800 million and $300 million in 2009, 2008 and $400 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities included proceeds fromand deposits related to asset sales of $2.6 billion in 2009, $1.5 billion in 2008 and $3.3 billion in 2007 and $1.0 billion in 2006.2007.
     At December 31, 2008, restrictedRestricted cash of $123 million and $367 million associated with various capital-investment projects at the company’s Pascagoula, Mississippi, refineryDecember 31, 2009 and Angola liquefied natural gas project2008, respectively, was invested in short-term marketable securities and reclassified from cash equivalents to a long-term assetrecorded as “Deferred charges and other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
     Dividends The companyDividends paid dividends ofto common stockholders were approximately $5.3 billion in 2009, $5.2 billion in 2008 and $4.8 billion in 2007 and $4.4 billion in 2006.2007. In April 2008,July 2009, the company increased its quarterly common stock dividend by 12.14.6 percent to $0.65$0.68 per share.
     Debt and capital lease and minority interest obligations Total debt and capital lease balancesobligations were $8.9$10.5 billion at December 31, 2008,2009, up from $7.2$8.9 billion at year-end 2007. The company also had minority interest obligations of $469 million and $204 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.2008.
     The $1.7$1.6 billion increase in total debt and capital lease obligations during 20082009 included the net effect of an approximate $2.7a $5 billion increasepublic bond issuance, a $350 million issuance of tax-exempt Gulf Opportunity Zone bonds, a $3.2 billion decrease in commercial paper, and $749a $400 million payment of Chevron Canada Funding Companyprincipal for Texaco Capital Inc. bonds that matured.matured in January 2009. The company’s debt and capital lease obligations due within one year, consisting primarily of commercial paper and the current portion of long-term debt, totaled $4.6 billion at
December 31, 2009, down from $7.8 billion at December 31, 2008, up from $5.5 billion at year-end 2007.2008. Of these amounts, $5.0$4.2 billion and $4.4$5.0 billion were reclassified to long-term at the end of each period, respectively. At year-end 2008,2009, settlement of these obligations was not expected to require the use of working capital within one year,in 2010, as the company had the intent and the ability, as evidenced by committed credit facilities, to refinance them on a long-term basis.
     At year-end 2008,2009, the company had $5$5.1 billion in committed credit facilities with various major banks, which permit the refinancing of short-term obligations on a long-term basis. These facilities support commercial-papercommercial paper borrowing and also can be used for general corporate purposes. The company’s practice has been to continually



FS-10


replace expiring commitments with new commitments on substantially the same terms, maintaining levels management believes appropriate. Terms of new commitments in the future will be subject to market conditions at the time of renewal. Any borrowings under the facilities would be



unsecured indebtedness at interest rates based on London Interbank Offered Rate or an average of base lending rates published by specified banks and on terms reflecting the company’s strong credit rating. No borrowings were outstanding under these facilities at December 31, 2008.2009. In addition, the company has an automatic shelf registration statement that expires in March 2010 for an unspecified amount of nonconvertible debt securities issued or guaranteed by the company. In January 2009,The company intends to file a new shelf registration statement when the company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance ofcurrent one or more series of notes or debentures in an aggregate amount up to $5 billion for a term not to exceed ten years.expires.

     At December 31, 2008, theThe company hadhas outstanding public bonds issued by Chevron Corporation, Chevron Corporation Profit Sharing/Savings Plan Trust Fund, Texaco Capital Inc. and Union Oil Company of California. All of these securities are the obligations of, or guaranteed by, Chevron Corporation and are rated AA by Standard and Poor’s Corporation and Aa1 by Moody’s Investors Service. The company’s U.S. commercial paper is rated A-1+ by Standard and Poor’s and P-1 by Moody’s. All of these ratings denote high-quality, investment-grade securities.
     The company’s future debt level is dependent primarily on results of operations, the capital-spending program and cash that may be generated from asset dispositions. DuringThe company believes that it has substantial borrowing capacity to meet unanticipated cash requirements and that during periods of low prices for crude oil and natural gas and narrow margins for refined products and commodity chemicals, the companyit has the flexibility to increase borrowings and/or modify capital-spending plans to continue paying the common stock dividend and maintain the company’s high-quality debt ratings.

     Common stock repurchase program In September 2007, the company authorized the acquisition of up to $15 billion of additionalits common shares from time to time at prevailing prices, as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements and subject to market conditions and other factors. The program is for a period of up to three years (expiring in 2010) and may be discontinued at any time. Through December 31, 2008, 119 million shares had been acquired under the program for $10.1 billion, including $8.0 billion in 2008. These amounts include shares acquired in October 2008 as part of an asset-exchange transaction described in Note 2 beginning on page FS-34. The company did not acquire any shares in earlyduring 2009 and does not plan to acquire any shares in the 2009 first quarter.quarter 2010. From the inception of the program, the company has acquired 119 million shares at a cost of $10.1 billion.


FS-11


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations



Capital and exploratory expendituresExploratory Expenditures Total reported expenditures for 2008 were $22.8 billion, including $2.3 billion for the company’s share of affiliates’ expenditures, which did not require cash outlays by the company. In 2007 and 2006, expenditures were $20.0 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively, including the company’s share of affiliates’ expenditures of $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion in the corresponding periods.
     Of the $22.8 billion in expenditures for 2008, about three-fourths, or $17.5
                                       
          2009           2008           2007 
         
Millions of dollars U.S.  Int’l.  Total   U.S.  Int’l.  Total   U.S.  Int’l.  Total 
       
Upstream – Exploration and Production $3,261  $13,848  $17,109   $5,516  $11,944  $17,460   $4,558  $10,980  $15,538 
Downstream – Refining, Marketing and Transportation  1,910   2,511   4,421    2,182   2,023   4,205    1,576   1,867   3,443 
Chemicals  210   92   302    407   78   485    218   53   271 
All Other  402   3   405    618   7   625    768   6   774 
       
Total $5,783  $16,454  $22,237   $8,723  $14,052  $22,775   $7,120  $12,906  $20,026 
       
Total, Excluding Equity in Affiliates $5,558  $15,094  $20,652   $8,241  $12,228  $20,469   $6,900  $10,790  $17,690 
       

Capital and exploratory expenditures Total expenditures for 2009 were $22.2 billion, including $1.6 billion for the company’s share of equity-affiliate expenditures and $2 billion for the extension of an upstream concession. In 2008 and 2007, expenditures were $22.8 billion and $20.0 billion, respectively, including the company’s share of affiliates’ expenditures of
$2.3 billion in both periods.
     Of the $22.2 billion of expenditures in 2009, about
three-fourths, or $17.1 billion, is related to upstream activities. Approximately the same percentage was also expended for upstream operations in 2008 and 2007. International upstream accounted for about 80 percent of the worldwide upstream investment in 2009 and about
70 percent in 2008 and 2007, and 2006. International upstream accounted for about 70 percent of the worldwide
upstream investment in each of the three years, reflecting the company’s continuing focus on opportunities that are available outside the United States.
     The company estimates that in 2009,2010, capital and exploratory expenditures will be $22.8$21.6 billion, including $1.8$1.6 billion of spending by affiliates. About three-fourths80 percent of the total, or $17.5$17.3 billion, is budgeted for exploration and production activities, with $13.9$13.2 billion of this amount for projects outside the United States. Spending in 20092010 is primarily targeted for exploratory prospects in the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico western Africa, and the Gulf of Thailand and major development projects in Angola, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia,Canada, China, Nigeria, Thailand and the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Also included are one-time payments associated with upstream operating agreementsis funding for base business improvements and focused appraisals in China and the Partitioned Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
core hydrocarbon basins.




FS-11


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Capital and Exploratory Expenditures

                                       
  2008   2007   2006 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Int’l.  Total   U.S.  Int’l.  Total   U.S.  Int’l.  Total 
        
Upstream – Exploration and Production $5,516  $11,944  $17,460   $4,558  $10,980  $15,538   $4,123  $8,696  $12,819 
Downstream – Refining, Marketing and Transportation  2,182   2,023   4,205    1,576   1,867   3,443    1,176   1,999   3,175 
Chemicals  407   78   485    218   53   271    146   54   200 
All Other  618   7   625    768   6   774    403   14   417 
        
Total $8,723  $14,052  $22,775   $7,120  $12,906  $20,026   $5,848  $10,763  $16,611 
        
Total, Excluding Equity in Affiliates $8,241  $12,228  $20,469   $6,900  $10,790  $17,690   $5,642  $9,050  $14,692 
        

     Worldwide downstream spending in 20092010 is estimated at $4.3$3.4 billion, with about $2.0$1.6 billion for projects in the

United States. CapitalMajor capital outlays include projects include upgrades tounder construction at refineries in the United States and South Korea and construction of a gas-to-liquids facilityfacilities in support of associated upstream projects.
     Investments in chemicals, technology and other corporate businesses in 20092010 are budgeted at $1.0 billion.$900 million. Technology investments include projects related to unconventional hydrocarbon technologies, oil and gas reservoir management, and gas-fired and renewable power generation.
     Noncontrolling interests The company had noncontrolling interests of $647 million and $469 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Distributions to noncontrolling interests totaled $71 million and $99 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Pension Obligations In 2008,2009, the company’s pension plan contributions were $839 million$1.7 billion (including $577$1.5 billion to the U.S. plans and $200 million to the U.S.international plans). The company estimates contributions in 20092010 will be approximately $800 million.$900 million ($600 million for the U.S. plans and $300 million for the international plans). Actual contribution amounts are dependent upon plan-investment results,investment returns, changes in pension obligations, regulatory requirementsenvironments and other economic factors. Additional funding may ultimately be required if investment returns are insufficient to offset increases in plan obligations. Refer also to the discussion of pension accounting in “Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions,” beginning on page FS-18.

Financial Ratios

Financial Ratios
                         
 At December 31  At December 31 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Current Ratio 1.1   1.2 1.3  1.4   1.1 1.2 
Interest Coverage Ratio 166.9   69.2 53.5  62.3   166.9 69.2 
Debt Ratio  9.3%   8.6%  12.5%  10.3%   9.3%  8.6%
       

     Current Ratio – current assets divided by current liabilities. The current ratio in all periods was adversely affected by the fact that Chevron’s inventories are valued on a Last-In, First-Out basis. At year-end 2008,2009, the book value of inventory


FS-12


was lower than replacement costs, based on average acquisition costs during the year, by approximately $9$5.5 billion.

Interest Coverage Ratio– income before income tax expense, plus interest and debt expense and amortization of capitalized interest, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, divided by before-tax interest costs. The company’s interest coverage ratio in 2009 was lower than 2008 and 2007 due to lower before-tax income.
Debt Ratio– total debt as a percentage of total debt plus Chevron Corporation Stockholders’ Equity. The increase in 2009 over 2008 and 2007 was primarily due to the increase in debt as a result of the $5 billion issuance of public bonds in 2009.
Guarantees, Off-Balance-
Sheet Arrangements and

Interest Coverage Ratio – income before income tax expense, plus interest and debt expense and amortization of capitalized interest, divided by before-tax interest costs. The company’s interest coverage ratio was higher between 2007 and 2008 and between 2006 and 2007, primarily due to higher before-tax income and lower average debt balances in each of the subsequent years.

Debt Ratio – total debt as a percentage of total debt plus equity. The increase between 2007 and 2008 was primarily due to higher debt. The decrease between 2006 and 2007 was due to lower debt and higher stockholders’ equity balance.


Guarantees, Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations, and Other Contingencies

Direct Guarantee
                                        
Millions of dollars Commitment Expiration by Period  Commitment Expiration by Period 
 2010– 2012– After  2011– 2013– After 
 Total 2009 2011 2013 2013  Total 2010 2012 2014 2014 
Guarantee of non-consolidated affiliate or joint-venture obligation $ 613 $ $ $76 $ 537 
Guarantee of non-
consolidated affiliate or
joint-venture obligation
 $613 $ $38 $77 $498 

     The company’s guarantee of approximately $600 million is associated with certain payments under a terminal-useterminal use agreement entered into by a company affiliate. The terminal is expected to be operational by 2012. Over the approximate 16-year term of the guarantee, the maximum guarantee amount will be reduced over time as certain fees are paid by the affiliate.



FS-12


There are numerous cross-indemnity agreements with the affiliate and the other partners to permit recovery of any amounts paid under the guarantee. Chevron has recorded no liability for its obligation under this guarantee.

     IndemnificationsThe company provided certain indemnities of contingent liabilities of Equilon and Motiva to Shell and Saudi Refining, Inc., in connection with the February 2002 sale of the company’s interests in those investments. The company would be required to perform if the indemnified liabilities become actual losses. Were that to occur, the company could be required to make future payments up to $300 million. Through the end of 2008,2009, the company had paid $48 million under these indemnities and continues to be obligated for possible additional indemnification payments in the future.
     The company has also provided indemnities relating to contingent environmental liabilities related to assets originallyorigi-
nally contributed by Texaco to the Equilon and Motiva joint ventures and environmental conditions that existed prior to the formation of Equilon and Motiva or that occurred during the period of Texaco’s ownership interest in the joint ventures. In general, the environmental conditions or events that are subject to these indemnities must have arisen prior to December 2001. Claims musthad to be asserted no later thanby February 2009 for Equilon indemnities and must be asserted no later than February 2012 for Motiva indemnities. Under the terms of these indemnities, there is no maximum limit on the amount of potential future payments. In February 2009, Shell delivered a letter to the company purporting to preserve unmatured claims for certain Equilon indemnities. The letter itself provides no estimate of the ultimate claim amount, and managementamount. Management does not believe thethis letter or any other information provides a basis to estimate the amount, if any, of a range of loss or potential range of loss with respect to either the Equilon or the Motiva indemnities. The company posts no assets as collateral and has made no payments under the indemnities.
     The amounts payable for the indemnities described abovein the preceding paragraph are to be net of amounts recovered from insurance carriers and others and net of liabilities recorded by Equilon or Motiva prior to September 30, 2001, for any applicable incident.
     In the acquisition of Unocal, the company assumed certain indemnities relating to contingent environmental liabilities associated with assets that were sold in 1997. Under the indemnification agreement, the company’s liability is unlimited until April 2022, when the indemnification expires. The acquirer sharesof those assets shared in certain environmental remediation costs up to a maximum obligation of $200 million, which had not been reached as ofat December 31, 2008.2009. Under the indemnification agreement, after reaching the $200 million obligation, Chevron is solely responsible until April 2022, when the indemnification expires. The environmental conditions or events that are subject to these indemnities must have arisen prior to the sale of the assets in 1997.
     Securitization  During 2008,Although the company terminatedhas provided for known obligations under this indemnity that are probable and reasonably estimable, the program usedamount of additional future costs may be material to securitize downstream-related trade accounts receivable. At year-end 2007,results of operations in the balance of securitized receivables was $675 million. As of December 31, 2008, the company had no other securitization arrangementsperiod in place.
Minority Interestswhich they are recognized. The company has commitments of $469 million related to minority interests in subsidiary companies.

does not expect these costs will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity.

Long-Term Unconditional Purchase Obligations and Commitments, Including Throughput and Take-or-Pay AgreementsThe company and its subsidiaries have certain other contingent liabilities relating to long-term unconditional purchase obligations and commitments, including throughput and take-or-pay agreements, some of which relate to suppliers’ financing arrangements. The agreements typically provide goods and services, such as pipeline and storage capacity, drilling rigs, utilities, and petroleum products, to be used or sold in the ordinary course of the company’s business. The aggregate approximate amounts of required payments under these various commitments are: 2009 – $6.4 billion; 2010 – $4.0$7.5 billion; 2011 – $3.6$4.3 billion; 2012 – $1.5$1.4 billion; 2013 – $1.3$1.4 billion; 2014 – $1.0 billion; 2015 and after – $4.3$4.1 billion. A portion of these commitments may ultimately be shared with project



FS-13


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations



partners. Total payments under the agreements were approximately $8.1 billion in 2009, $5.1 billion in 2008 and $3.7 billion in 2007 and $3.0 billion in 2006.2007.
     The following table summarizes the company’s significant contractual obligations:

Contractual Obligations1
                                        
Millions of dollars Payments Due by Period  Payments Due by Period 
 2010– 2012– After  2011– 2013– After 
 Total 2009 2011 2013 2013  Total 2010 2012 2014 2014 
 
On Balance Sheet:2
  
Short-Term Debt3
 $ 2,818 $ 2,818 $–  $ $  $384 $384 $ $ $ 
Long-Term Debt3
 5,742   5,061 74 607  9,829  5,743 2,041 2,045 
Noncancelable Capital Lease Obligations 548 97 154 143 154  499 90 168 104 137 
Interest 2,133 174 322 312 1,325  2,590 317 566 426 1,281 
Off-Balance-Sheet:  
Noncancelable Operating Lease Obligations 2,888 503 835 603 947  3,364 568 844 719 1,233 
Throughput and Take-or-Pay Agreements 15,726 5,063 5,383 1,261 4,019  15,130 6,555 3,825 819 3,931 
Other Unconditional Purchase Obligations4
 5,356 1,342 2,159 1,541 314  4,617 1,024 1,906 1,538 149 
 
1 Excludes contributions for pensions and other postretirement benefit plans. Information on employee benefit plans is contained in Note 2221 beginning on page FS-51.FS-52.
 
2 Does not include amounts related to the company’s income tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions. The company is unable to make reasonable estimates for the periods in which these liabilities may become payable. The company does not expect settlement of such liabilities will have a material effect on its results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity in any single period.
 
3 $5.04.2 billion of short-term debt that the company expects to refinance is included in long-term debt. The repayment schedule above reflects the projected repayment of the entire amounts in the 2010–20112011–2012 period.
 
4 Does not include obligations to purchase the company’s share of natural gas liquids and regasified natural gas associated with operations of the 36.4 percent-owned Angola LNG affiliate. The LNG plant is expected to commence operations in 2012 and is designed to produce 5.2 million metric tons of liquefied natural gasLNG and related natural gas liquids per year. Volumes and prices associated with these purchase obligations are neither fixed nor determinable.

Financial and Derivative Instruments
The market risk associated with the company’s portfolio of financial and derivative instruments is discussed below. The estimates of financial exposure to market risk discussed below do not represent the company’s projection of future market changes. The actual impact of future market changes could differ materially due to factors discussed elsewhere in this report, including those set forth under the heading “Risk



FS-13


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, of the company’s 20082009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Derivative Commodity InstrumentsChevron is exposed to market risks related to the price volatility of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and refinery feedstocks.
     The company uses derivative commodity instruments to manage these exposures on a portion of its activity, including firm commitments and anticipated transactions for the purchase, sale and storage of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, natural gas liquids and feedstock for company refineries.
The company also uses derivative commodity instruments for limited trading purposes. The results of this activitythese activities were not material to the company’s financial position, net incomeresults of operations or cash flows in 2008.2009.
     The company’s market exposure positions are monitored and managed on a daily basis by an internal Risk Control group to ensure compliancein accordance with the company’s risk management policies, thatwhich have been approved by the Audit Committee of the company’s Board of Directors.
     The derivative commodity instruments used in the company’s risk management and trading activities consist mainly of futures, options and swap contracts traded on the NYMEX (NewNew York Mercantile Exchange)Exchange and on electronic platforms of ICE (Inter-Continental Exchange)the Inter-Continental Exchange and GLOBEX (ChicagoChicago Mercantile Exchange).Exchange. In addition, crude oil, natural gas and refined-product swap contracts and option contracts are entered into principally with major financial institutions and other oil and gas companies in the “over-the-counter” markets.
     Virtually all derivatives beyond those designated as normal purchase and normal sale contracts are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. Fair values are derived principally from published market quotes and other independent third-party quotes. The change in fair value from Chevron’s derivative commodity instruments in 20082009 was a quarterly average increasedecrease of $160$168 million in total assets and a quarterly average decrease of $1$104 million in total liabilities.

     The company uses a Value-at-Risk (VaR) model to estimate the potential loss in fair value on a single day from the effect of adverse changes in market conditions on derivative commodity instruments held or issued, which are recorded on the balance sheet at
December 31, 2008,2009, as derivative commodity instruments in accordance with FAS Statement No. 133, “Accountingaccounting standards for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended (FAS 133)derivatives (ASC 815). VaR is the maximum loss not to be exceeded within a given probability or confidence level over a given period of time. The company’s VaR model uses the Monte Carlo simulation method that involves generating hypothetical scenarios from the specified probability distribution and constructing a full distribution of a portfolio’s potential values.

     The VaR model utilizes an exponentially weighted moving average for computing historical volatilities and correlations, a 95 percent confidence level, and a one-day holding period. That is, the company’s 95 percent, one-day VaR corresponds to the unrealized loss in portfolio value that would not be exceeded on average more than one in every 20 trading days, if the portfolio were held constant for one day.
     The one-day holding period is based on the assumption that market-risk positions can be liquidated or hedged within one day. For hedging and risk management, the company uses conventional exchange-traded instruments such as futures and options as well as non-exchange-traded swaps,


FS-14


most of which can be liquidated or hedged effectively within one day. The table below presents the 95 percent/one-day VaR for each of the company’s primary risk exposures in the area of derivative commodity instruments at December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008. The higherlower amounts in 20082009 were primarily associated with an increasea decrease in price volatility for these commodities during the year.
                
Millions of dollars 2008 2007  2009 2008 
       
Crude Oil $39   $29  $17   $39 
Natural Gas 5   3  4   5 
Refined Products 45   23  19   45 
      

     Foreign Currency The company entersmay enter into forward exchangeforeign-currency derivative contracts generally with terms of 180 days or less, to manage some of its foreign currencyforeign-currency exposures. These exposures include revenue and anticipated purchase transactions, including foreign currencyforeign-currency capital expenditures and lease commitments, forecasted to occur within 180 days.commitments. The forward exchangeforeign-currency derivative contracts, if any, are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income.
     The aggregate effect of a hypothetical 10 percent increase in the value of the U.S. dollar There were no open foreign-currency derivative contracts at year-end 2008 would be a reduction in the fair value of the foreign exchange contracts of approximately $100 million. The effect would be the opposite for a hypothetical 10 percent decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar at year-end 2008.December 31, 2009.
     Interest RatesThe company entersmay enter into interest-rateinterest rate swaps from time to time as part of its overall strategy to manage the interest rate risk on its debt. UnderHistorically, under the terms of the swaps, net cash settlements arewere based on the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to agreed notional principal amounts. Interest rate swaps related to a portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt, areif any, may be accounted for as fair value hedges. Interest rate swaps related to floating-rate debt, if any, are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. At year-end 2008,2009, the company had no interest-rateinterest rate swaps on floating-rate debt. The company’s only interest-rateinterest rate swaps on fixed-rate debt matured in January 2009 and the company had no interest rate swaps on
fixed-rate debt at year-end 2009.



FS-14


Transactions With Related Parties
Chevron enters into a number of business arrangements with related parties, principally its equity affiliates. These arrangements include long-term supply or offtake agreements and long-term purchase agreements. Refer to Other Financial Information in Note 1224 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, page FS-42,FS-61, for further discussion. Management believes these agreements have been negotiated on terms consistent with those that would have been negotiated with an unrelated party.

Litigation and Other Contingencies
MTBE Chevron and many other companies in the petroleum industry have used methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) as a gasoline additive. In October 2008, 59 cases were settled in which the company was a party and which related to the use of MTBE in certain oxygenated gasolines and the alleged seepage of MTBE into groundwater. The terms of this agreement are confidential and not material to the company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial position. Chevron is a party to 37 other50 pending lawsuits and claims, the majority of which involve numerous other petroleum marketers and refiners. Resolution of these lawsuits and claims may ultimately require the company to correct or ameliorate the alleged effects on the environment of prior release of MTBE by the company or other parties. Additional lawsuits and claims related to the use of MTBE,
including personal-injury claims, may be filed in the future. The settlement of the 59 lawsuits did not set any precedents related to standards of liability to be used to judge the merits of the claims, corrective measures required or monetary damages to be assessed for the remaining lawsuits and claims or future lawsuits and claims. As a result, the company’s ultimate exposure related to pending lawsuits and claims is not currently determinable, but could be material to net income in any one period. The company no longer uses MTBE in the manufacture of gasoline in the United States.
RFG Patent  Fourteen purported class actions were brought by consumers who purchased reformulated gasoline (RFG) from January 1995 through August 2005, alleging that Unocal misled the California Air Resources Board into adopting standards for composition of RFG that overlapped with Unocal’s undisclosed and pending patents. The parties agreed to a settlement that calls for, among other things, Unocal to pay $48 million and for the establishment of acy presfund to administer payout of the award. The court approved the final settlement in November 2008.
     Ecuador Chevron is a defendant in a civil lawsuit before the Superior Court of Nueva Loja in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, brought in May 2003 by plaintiffs who claim to be representatives of certain residents of an area where an oil production consortium formerly had operations. The lawsuit alleges damage to the environment from the oil exploration and production operations and seeks unspecified damages to fund environmental remediation and restoration of the alleged environmental harm, plus a health monitoring program. Until 1992, Texaco Petroleum Company (Texpet), a subsidiary of Texaco Inc., was a minority member of this consortium with Petroecuador, the Ecuadorian state-owned

oil company, as the majority partner; since 1990, the operations have been conducted solely by Petroecuador. At the conclusion of the consortium and following an independent third-party environmental audit of the concession area, Texpet entered into a formal agreement with the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador for Texpet to remediate specific sites assigned by the government in proportion to Texpet’s ownership share of the consortium. Pursuant to that agreement, Texpet conducted a three-year remediation program at a cost of $40 million. After certifying that the sites were properly remediated, the government granted Texpet and all related corporate entities a full release from any and all environmental liability arising from the consortium operations.

     Based on the history described above, Chevron believes that this lawsuit lacks legal or factual merit. As to matters of law, the company believes first, that the court lacks jurisdiction over Chevron; second, that the law under which plaintiffs bring the action, enacted in 1999, cannot be applied retroactively to Chevron;retroactively; third, that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations in Ecuador; and, fourth, that the lawsuit is also barred by the releases from liability previously given to Texpet by the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador. With regard to the facts, the company believes that the evidence confirms that Texpet’s remediation was properly conducted and that the remaining environmental damage reflects Petroecuador’s failure to timely fulfill its legal obligations and Petroecuador’s further conduct since assuming full control over the operations.
     In April 2008, a mining engineer appointed by the court to identify and determine the cause of environmental damage, and to specify steps needed to remediate it, issued a report recommending that the court assess $8 billion, which would, according to the engineer, provide financial compensation for purported damages, including wrongful death claims, and pay for, among other items, environmental remediation, health care systems and additional infrastructure for Petroecuador. The engineer’s report also asserted that an additional $8.3 billion could be assessed against Chevron for unjust enrichment. The engineer’s report is not binding on the court. Chevron also believes that the engineer’s work


FS-15


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


was performed and his report prepared in a manner contrary to law and in violation of the court’s orders. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the report in which it asked the court to strike the report in its entirety. In November 2008, the engineer revised the report and, without additional evidence, recommended an increase in the financial compensation for purported damages to a total of $18.9 billion and an increase in the assessment for purported unjust enrichment to a total of $8.4 billion. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the revised report, which the court dismissed. In September 2009, following the disclosure by Chevron of evidence that the judge participated in meetings in which businesspeople and individuals holding themselves out as government officials discussed the case and its likely outcome, the judge presiding over the case petitioned to be recused. In late September 2009, the judge was recused, and in October 2009, the full chamber of the provincial court affirmed the recusal, resulting in the appointment of a new judge. Chevron filed motions to annul all of the rulings made by the prior judge, but the new judge denied these motions. The court has completed most of the procedural aspects of the case and could render a judgment at any time. Chevron will continue a vigorous defense of any attempted imposition of liability.
     In the event of an adverse judgment, Chevron would expect to pursue its appeals and vigorously defend against enforcement of any such judgment; therefore, the ultimate outcome – and any financial effect on Chevron – remains uncertain. Management does not believe an estimate of a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss) can be made in this case. Due to the defects associated with the engineer’s report, management does not believe the report itself has any utility in calculating a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss). Moreover, the highly uncertain legal environment surrounding the case provides no basis for management to


FS-15


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


estimate a reasonablereasonably possible loss (or a range of loss).

     Environmental The company is subject to loss contingencies pursuant to laws, regulations, private claims and legal proceedings related to environmental laws and regulationsmatters that are subject to legal settlements or that in the future may require the company to take action to correct or ameliorate the effects on the environment of prior release of chemicals or petroleum substances, including MTBE, by the company or other parties. Such contingencies may exist for various sites, including, but not limited to, federal Superfund sites and analogous sites under state laws, refineries, crude oilcrude-oil fields, service stations, terminals, land development areas, and mining operations, whether operating, closed or divested. These future costs are not fully determinable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the
determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.

     Although the company has provided for known environmental obligations that are probable and reasonably estimable, the amount of additional future costs may be material to results of operations in the period in which they are recognized. The company does not expect these costs will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity. Also, the company does not believe its obligations

to make such expenditures have had, or will have, any significant impact on the company’s competitive position relative to other U.S. or international petroleum or chemical companies.
     The following table displays the annual changes to the company’s before-tax environmental remediation reserves, including those for federal Superfund sites and analogous sites under state laws.
                        
Millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
        
Balance at January 1 $1,539   $1,441 $1,469  $1,818   $1,539 $1,441 
Net Additions 784   562 366  351   784 562 
Expenditures  (505)   (464)  (394)  (469)   (505)  (464)
        
Balance at December 31
 $1,818   $1,539 $1,441  $1,700   $1,818 $1,539 
       
     Included in the $1,818$1,700 million year-end 20082009 reserve balance were remediation activities of 248at approximately 250 sites for which

the company had been identified as a potentially responsible party or otherwise involved in the remediation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other regulatory agencies under the provisions of the federal Superfund law or analogous state laws. The company’s remediation reserve for these sites at year-end 20082009 was $120$185 million. The federal Superfund law and analogous state laws provide for joint and several liability for all responsible parties. Any future actions by the EPA or other regulatory agencies to require Chevron to assume other potentially responsible parties’ costs at designated hazardous waste sites are not expected to have a material effect on the company’s results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.



FS-16


     Of the remaining year-end 20082009 environmental reserves balance of $1,698$1,515 million, $968$820 million related to current and former sites for the company’s U.S. downstream operations, including refineries and other plants, marketing locations (i.e., service stations and terminals), and pipelines. The remaining $730$695 million was associated with various sites in international downstream ($117107 million), upstream ($390369 million), chemicals ($154149 million) and other businesses ($6970 million). Liabilities at all sites, whether operating, closed or divested, were primarily associated with the company’s plans and activities to remediate soil or groundwater contamination or both. These and other activities include one or more of the following: site assessment; soil excavation; offsite disposal of contaminants; onsite containment, remediation and/or extraction of petroleum hydrocarbon liquid and vapor from soil; groundwater extraction and treatment; and monitoring of the natural attenuation of the contaminants.
     The company manages environmental liabilities under specific sets of regulatory requirements, which in the United States include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and various state orand local regulations. No single remediation site at year-end 20082009 had a recorded liability that was material to the company’s financial position, results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.
     It is likely that the company will continue to incur additional liabilities, beyond those recorded, for environmental remediation relating to past operations. These future costs are not fully determinable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.
     The company accountsUnder accounting standards for asset retirement obligations in accordance with FASB Statement No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
(FAS 143). Under FAS 143,ASC 410), the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recorded when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of long-lived assets and the liability can be



FS-16


reasonably estimated. The liability balance of approximately $9.4$10.2 billion for asset retirement obligations at year-end 20082009 related primarily to upstream properties.

     For the company’s other ongoing operating assets, such as refineries and chemicals facilities, no provisions are made for exit or cleanup costs that may be required when such assets reach the end of their useful lives unless a decision to sell or otherwise abandon the facility has been made, as the indeterminate settlement dates for the asset retirements prevent estimation of the fair value of the asset retirement obligation.
     Refer also to Note 24, beginning23 on page FS-58,FS-60, related to FAS 143 and the company’s adoption in 2005 of FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143(FIN 47),asset retirement obligations and the discussion of “Environmental Matters” below.on page FS-18.
     Income Taxes The company calculates its income tax expense and liabilities quarterly. These liabilities generally are subject to audit and are not finalized with the individual taxing authorities until several years after the end of the annual period for which income taxes have been calculated.
Refer to Note 1615 beginning on page FS-45FS-46 for a discussion of the periods for which tax returns have been audited for the company’s major tax jurisdictions and a discussion for all tax jurisdictions of the differences between the amount of tax benefits recognized in the financial statements and the amount taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The company does not expect that settlement of income tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions will have a material effect on its results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.
     The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which contained a number of energy and tax-related provisions, known as the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 (the Act), was signed into U.S. law in October 2008. The Act includes two provisions that affect Chevron’s tax liability, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Act freezes at 6 percent the domestic manufacturer’s deduction on income from U.S. oil and gas operations that was scheduled to increase to 9 percent in 2010. Effective in 2009, the Act expands the current foreign tax credit (FTC) limitation for Foreign Oil and Gas Extraction Income to also include foreign downstream income, known as Foreign Oil Related Income. This change is expected to impact Chevron’s utilization of FTCs.
Suspended Wells The company suspends the costs of exploratory wells pending a final determination of the commercial potential of the related crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas fields. The ultimate disposition of these well costs is dependent on the results of future drilling activity or development decisions or both. At December 31, 2008,2009, the company had approximately $2.1$2.4 billion of suspended exploratory wells included in properties, plant and equipment, an increase of $458$317 million from 2007.2008. The 20072008 balance reflected an increase of $421$458 million from 2006.2007.
     The future trend of the company’s exploration expenses can be affected by amounts associated with well write-offs, including wells that had been previously suspended pending determination as to whether the well had found reserves

that could be classified as proved. The effect on exploration expenses in future periods of the $2.1$2.4 billion of suspended wells at year-end 20082009 is uncertain pending future activities, including normal project evaluation and additional drilling.

     Refer to Note 20,19, beginning on page FS-48,FS-50, for additional discussion of suspended wells.
     Equity Redetermination For oil and gas producing operations, ownership agreements may provide for periodic reassessments of equity interests in estimated crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas reserves. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses that could be material to earnings in any given period. One such equity redetermination process has been under way since 1996 for Chevron’s interests in four producing zones at the Naval Petroleum Reserve at Elk Hills, California, for the time when the remaining interests in these zones were owned by the U.S. Department of Energy. A wide range remains for a possible net settlement amount for the four zones. For this range of settlement, Chevron estimates its maximum possible net before-tax liability at approximately $200 million, and the possible maximum net amount that could be owed to Chevron is estimated at about $150 million. The timing of the settlement and the exact amount within this range of estimates are uncertain.
     Other Contingencies Chevron receives claims from and submits claims to customers; trading partners; U.S. federal, state and local regulatory bodies; governments; contractors; insurers; and suppliers. The amounts of these claims, individually and in the aggregate, may be significant and take lengthy periods to resolve.


FS-17


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


     The company and its affiliates also continue to review and analyze their operations and may close, abandon, sell, exchange, acquire or restructure assets to achieve operational or strategic benefits and to improve competitiveness and profitability. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses in future periods.

Environmental Matters
Virtually all aspects of the businesses in which the company engages are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These regulatory requirements continue to increase in both number and complexity over time and govern not only the manner in which the company conducts its operations, but also the products it sells. Most of the costs of complying with laws and regulations pertaining to company operations and products are embedded in the normal costs of doing business.
     Accidental leaks and spills requiring cleanup may occur in the ordinary course of business. In addition to the costs for environmental protection associated with its ongoing operations and products, the company may incur expenses for corrective actions at various owned and previously owned facilities and at
third-party-owned waste-disposal sites used by the company. An obligation may arise when operations are closed or sold or atnon-Chevron sites where company products have been handled or disposed of. Most of the expenditures to fulfill these obligations relate to facilities and sites where past operations followed practices and procedures that were con-



FS-17


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


sideredconsidered acceptable at the time but now require investigative or remedial work or both to meet current standards.

     Using definitions and guidelines established by the American Petroleum Institute, Chevron estimated its worldwide environmental spending in 20082009 at approximately $3.1$3.5 billion for its consolidated companies. Included in these expenditures were approximately $1.3$1.7 billion of environmental capital expenditures and $1.8 billion of costs associated with the prevention, control, abatement or elimination of hazardous substances and pollutants from operating, closed or divested sites, and the abandonment and restoration of sites.
     For 2009,2010, total worldwide environmental capital expenditures are estimated at $2.2$2.1 billion. These capital costs are in addition to the ongoing costs of complying with environmental regulations and the costs to remediate previously contaminated sites.
     It is not possible to predict with certainty the amount of additional investments in new or existing facilities or amounts of incremental operating costs to be incurred in the future to: prevent, control, reduce or eliminate releases of hazardous materials into the environment; comply with existingexist-
ing and new environmental laws or regulations; or remediate and restore areas damaged by prior releases of hazardous materials. Although these costs may be significant to the results of operations in any single period, the company does not expect them to have a material effect on the company’s liquidity or financial position.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
Management makes many estimates and assumptions in the application of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that may have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and on the comparability of such information over different reporting periods. All such estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates and assumptions are based on management’s experience and other information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known.
     The discussion in this section of “critical” accounting estimates orand assumptions is according to the disclosure guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), wherein:
 1. the nature of the estimates orand assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment neces-

sarynecessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and
 
2. the impact of the estimates and assumptions on the company’s financial condition or operating performance is material.

     Besides those meeting these “critical” criteria, the company makes many other accounting estimates and assumptions in preparing its financial statements and related disclosures. Although not associated with “highly uncertain matters,” these estimates and assumptions are also subject to revision as circumstances warrant, and materially different results may sometimes occur.
     For example, the recording of deferred tax assets requires an assessment under the accounting rules that the future realization of the associated tax benefits be “more likely than not.” Another example is the estimation of crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas reserves under SEC rules, thatwhich, effective December 31, 2009, require “... geological“...by analysis of geosciences and engineering data, (that) demonstrate(the reserves) can be estimated with reasonable certainty (reserves) to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs undereconomically producible...under existing economic and operatingconditions” where existing economic conditions i.e.,include prices and costs as ofbased on the dateaverage price during the estimate is made.”


FS-18


12-month period. Refer to Table V, “Reserve Quantity Information,” beginning on page FS-67,FS-69, for the changes in these estimates for the three years ending December 31, 2008,2009, and to Table VII, “Changes in the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows From Proved Reserves” on page FS-74FS-77 for estimates of
proved-reserve values for each of the three years ended December 31, 2008, which were based on year-end prices at the time.2009. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page FS-32, includes a description of the “successful efforts” method of accounting for oil and gas exploration and production activities. The estimates of crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas reserves are important to the timing of expense recognition for costs incurred.
     The discussion of the critical accounting policy for “Impairment of Properties, Plant and Equipment and Investments in Affiliates,” beginning on page FS-20, includes reference to conditions under which downward revisions of proved-reserve quantities could result in impairments of oil and gas properties. This commentary should be read in conjunction with disclosures elsewhere in this discussion and in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to estimates, uncertainties, contingencies and new accounting standards. Significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page FS-32. The development and selection of accounting estimates



FS-18


and assumptions, including those deemed “critical,” and the associated disclosures in this discussion have been discussed by management with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

     The areas of accounting and the associated “critical” estimates and assumptions made by the company are as follows:
     Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans The determination of pension-plan obligations and expense is based on a number of actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate applied to pension plan obligations. For other postretirement benefit (OPEB) plans, which provide for certain health care and life insurance benefits for qualifying retired employees and which are not funded, critical assumptions in determining OPEB obligations and expense are the discount rate and the assumed health care
cost-trend rates.
     Note 22,21, beginning on page FS-51,FS-52, includes information on the funded status of the company’s pension and OPEB plans at the end of 20082009 and 2007;2008; the components of pension and OPEB expense for the three years ending December 31, 2008;2009; and the underlying assumptions for those periods.
     Pension and OPEB expense is recordedreported on the Consolidated Statement of Income inas “Operating expenses” or “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and applies to all business segments. The year-end 20082009 and 20072008 funded status, measured as the difference between plan assets and obligations, of each of the company’s pension and OPEB plans is recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The funded status of
differences related to overfunded pension plans is recordedare reported as a long-term asset in “Deferred charges and other assets.” The funded status ofdifferences associated with underfunded or unfunded pension and OPEB plans is recorded inare reported as “Accrued liabilities” or “Reserves for employee benefit plans.” Amounts yet to be recognized as components of pension or OPEB expense are recordedreported in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”
     To estimate the long-term rate of return on pension assets, the company uses a process that incorporates actual historical asset-class returns and an assessment of expected future performance and takes into consideration external actuarial advice and asset-class factors. Asset allocations are periodically updated using pension plan asset/liability studies, and the determination of the company’s estimates of long-term rates of return are consistent with these studies. The expected long-term rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets, which account for 6869 percent of the company’s pension plan assets, has remained at 7.8 percent since 2002. For the 10 years ending December 31, 2008,2009, actual asset returns averaged 3.7 percent for this plan. The actual asset returns for the 10 years ending December 31, 2007, averaged 8.7 percent. The actual return for 20082009 was negative15.7 percent and was associated with the broad declinerecovery in the financial markets in the second half of the year.markets.

     The year-end market-related value of assets of the major U.S. pension plan used in the determination of pension expense was based on the market value in the preceding three months, as opposed to the maximum allowable period of five years under U.S. accounting rules. Management considers the three-month period long enough to minimize the effects of distortions from day-to-day market volatility and still be contemporaneous to the end of the year. For other plans, market value of assets as of year-end is used in calculating the pension expense.
     The discount rate assumptions used to determine U.S. and international pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations and expense reflect the prevailing rates available on high-qualityfixed-income debt instruments. At December 31, 2008,2009, the company selected a 6.35.3 percent discount rate for the major U.S. pension plan and postretirement plans. This rate was5.8 percent for its OPEB plan. These rates were selected based on a cash flow analysis that matched estimated future benefit payments to the Citigroup Pension Discount Yield Curve as ofyear-end 2008. 2009. The discount rates at the end of 20072008 and 20062007 were 6.3 percent for both years for the U.S. pension and 5.8 percent, respectively.OPEB plans.
     An increase in the expected long-term return on plan assets or the discount rate would reduce pension plan expense, and vice versa. Total pension expense for 20082009 was $770 million.$1.1 billion. As an indication of the sensitivity of pension expense to the long-term rate of return assumption, a 1 percent increase in the expected rate of return on assets of the company’s primary U.S. pension plan would have reduced total pension plan expense for 20082009 by approximately $70$50 million. A 1 percent increase in the discount rate for this same plan, which accounted for about 61 percent of the


FS-19


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


companywide pension obligation, would have reduced total pension plan expense for 20082009 by approximately $140$150 million.
     An increase in the discount rate would decrease the pension obligation, thus changing the funded status of a plan recordedreported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total pension liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008,2009, for underfunded plans was approximately $4.0$3.8 billion. As an indication of the sensitivity of pension liabilities to the discount rate assumption, a 0.25 percent increase in the discount rate applied to the company’s primary U.S. pension plan would have reduced the plan obligation by approximately $250$300 million, which would have decreased the plan’s underfunded status from approximately $2.0$1.6 billion to $1.8$1.3 billion. Other plans would be less under-fundedunderfunded as discount rates increase. The actual rates of return on plan assets and discount rates may vary significantly from estimates because of unanticipated changes in the world’s financial markets.
     In 2008,2009, the company’s pension plan contributions were $839 million$1.7 billion (including $577 million$1.5 billion to the U.S. plans). In 2009,2010, the company estimates contributions will be approximately $800$900 million. Actual contribution amounts are


FS-19


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


dependent upon
plan-investment results, changes in pension obligations, regulatory requirements and other economic factors. Additional funding may be required if investment returns are insufficient to offset increases in plan obligations.

     ��For the company’s OPEB plans, expense for 20082009 was $179$164 million and the total liability, which reflected the unfunded status of the plans at the end of 2008,2009, was $2.9$3.1 billion.
     As an indication of discount rate sensitivity to the determination of OPEB expense in 2008,2009, a 1 percent increase in the discount rate for the company’s primary U.S. OPEB plan, which accounted for about 6769 percent of the companywide OPEB expense, would have decreased OPEB expense by approximately $20$11 million. A 0.25 percent increase in the discount rate for the same plan, which accounted for about 8684 percent of the companywide OPEB liabilities, would have decreased total OPEB liabilities at the end of 20082009 by approximately $56$65 million.
     For the main U.S. postretirement medical plan, the annual increase to company contributions is limited to 4 percent per year. For active employees and retirees under age 65 whose claims experiences are combined for rating purposes, the assumed health care cost-trend rates start with 7 percent in 20092010 and gradually drop to 5 percent for 20172018 and beyond. As an indication of the health care cost-trend rate sensitivity to the determination of OPEB expense in 2008,2009, a 1 percent
increase in the rates for the main U.S. OPEB plan, which accounted for 8684 percent of the companywide OPEB liabilities, would have increased OPEB expense $8 million.
     Differences between the various assumptions used to determine expense and the funded status of each plan and actual experience are not included in benefit plan costs in the year the difference occurs. Instead, the differences are included in actuarial gain/loss and unamortized amounts have been reflected in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Refer to Note 22,21, beginning on page FS-51,FS-52, for information on the $6.0$6.7 billion of before-tax actuarial losses recorded by the company as of December 31, 2008;2009; a description of the method used to amortize those costs; and an estimate of the costs to be recognized in expense during 2009.2010.
     Impairment of Properties, Plant and Equipment and Investments in Affiliates The company assesses its properties, plant and equipment (PP&E) for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Such indicators include changes in the company’s business plans, changes in commodity prices and, for crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas properties, significant downward revisions of estimated

proved-reserve quantities. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows expected from the asset, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess of carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value.

     Determination as to whether and how much an asset is impaired involves management estimates on highly uncertain matters, such as future commodity prices, the effects of inflation and technology improvements on operating expenses, production profiles, and the outlook for global or regional market supply-and-demand conditions for crude oil, natural gas, commodity chemicals and refined products. However, the impairment reviews and calculations are based on assumptions that are consistent with the company’s business plans and long-term investment decisions.
     No major individual impairments of PP&E and Investments were recorded for the three years ending December 31, 2008. An estimate as to2009. A sensitivity analysis of the sensitivity toimpact on earnings for these periods if other assumptions had been used in impairment reviews and impairment calculations is not practicable, given the broad range of the company’s PP&E and the number of assumptions involved in the estimates. That is, favorable changes to some assumptions might have avoided the need to impair any assets in these periods, whereas unfavorable changes might have caused an additional unknown number of other assets to become impaired.


FS-20


     Investments in common stock of affiliates that are accounted for under the equity method, as well as investments in other securities of these equity investees, are reviewed for impairment when the fair value of the investment falls below the company’s carrying value. When such a decline is deemed to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recorded to the income statement for the difference between the investment’s carrying value and its estimated fair value at the time.
     In making the determination as to whether a decline is other than temporary, the company considers such factors as the duration and extent of the decline, the investee’s financial performance, and the company’s ability and intention to retain its investment for a period that will be sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the investment’s market value. Differing assumptions could affect whether an investment is impaired in any period or the amount of the impairment, and are not subject to sensitivity analysis.
     From time to time, the company performs impairment reviews and determines whether any write-down in the carrying value of an asset or asset group is required. For example, when significant downward revisions to crude oilcrude-oil and natural gasnatural-gas reserves are made for any single field or concession, an impairment review is performed to determine if the carrying value of the asset remains recoverable. Also, if the expectation



FS-20


of sale of a particular asset or asset group in any period has been deemed more likely than not, an impairment review is performed, and if the estimated net proceeds exceed the carrying value of the asset or asset group, no impairment charge is required. Such calculations are reviewed each period until the asset or asset group is disposed of. Assets that are not impaired on a held-and-used basis could possibly become impaired if a decision is made to sell such assets. That is, the assets would be impaired if they are classified as held-for-sale and the estimated proceeds from the sale, less costs to sell, are less than the assets’ associated carrying values.

Business Combinations – Purchase-Price Allocation  Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of the company’s purchase price to the various assets and liabilities of the acquired business at their respective fair values. The company uses all available information to make these fair value determinations, and for major acquisitions, may hire an independent appraisal firm to assist in making fair value estimates. In some instances, assumptions with respect to the timing and amount of future revenues and expenses associated with an asset might have to be used in determining its fair value. Actual timing and amount of net cash flows from revenues and expenses related to that asset over time may differ materially from those initial estimates, and if the timing is delayed significantly or if the net cash flows decline significantly, the asset could become impaired. Effective January 1, 2009, the accounting for business combinations will change. Refer to Note 19 on page FS-48.
     Goodwill Goodwill resulting from a business combination is not subject to amortization. As required by FASB Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,accounting standards for goodwill (ASC 350), the company tests such goodwill at the reporting unit level for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
     Contingent Losses Management also makes judgments and estimates in recording liabilities for claims, litigation, tax matters and environmental remediation. Actual costs can frequently vary from estimates for a variety of reasons. For example, the costs from settlement of claims and litigation can vary from estimates based on differing interpretations of laws, opinions on culpability and assessments on the amount of damages. Similarly, liabilities for environmental remediation are subject to change because of changes in laws, regulations and their interpretation, the determination of
additional information on the extent and nature of site contamination, and improvements in technology.
     Under the accounting rules, a liability is generally recorded for these types of contingencies if management determines the loss to be both probable and estimable. The company generally recordsreports these losses as “Operating expenses” or “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Consolidated Statement of Income. An exception to this handling is for income tax matters, for which ben-

efitsbenefits are recognized only if management determines the tax position is “more likely than not” (i.e., likelihood greater than 50 percent) to be allowed by the tax jurisdiction. For additional discussion of income tax uncertainties, refer to Note 1615 beginning on page FS-45.FS-46. Refer also to the business segment discussions elsewhere in this section for the effect on earnings from losses associated with certain litigation, and environmental remediation and tax matters for the three years ended December 31, 2008.2009.

     An estimate as to the sensitivity to earnings for these periods if other assumptions had been used in recording these liabilities is not practicable because of the number of contingencies that must be assessed, the number of underlying assumptions and the wide range of reasonably possible outcomes, both in terms of the probability of loss and the estimates of such loss.

New Accounting Standards
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations162 (FAS 141-R)168)
In December 2007,June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 141-R, which became effective for business combination transactions having an acquisition date on or after January 1, 2009. This standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date to be measured at their respective fair values. It also requires acquisition-related costs, as well as restructuring costs the acquirer expects to incur for which it is not obligated at acquisition date, to be recorded against income rather than included in purchase-price determination. Finally, the standard requires recognition of contingent arrangements at their acquisition-date fair values, with subsequent changes in fair value generally reflected in income.
FASB Staff Position FAS 141(R)-a Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination (FSP FAS 141(R)-a)  In February 2009, the FASB approved for issuance FSP FAS 141(R)-a, which became effective for business combinations having an acquisition date on or after January 1, 2009. This standard requires an asset or liability arising from a contingency in a business combination to be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably determined. If it cannot be reasonably determined then the asset or liability will need to be recognized in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, and FASB Interpretation No. 14,Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of the Loss.
FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160)  The FASB issued FAS 160 in December 2007,168, which became effective for the company January 1, 2009, with retroactive adoption of the Standard’s presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. This standard requires ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be presented within the



FS-21


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet but separate from the parent’s equity. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Income. Certain changes in a parent’s ownership interest are to be accounted for as equity transactions and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary is to be initially measured at fair value. Implementation of FAS 160 will not significantly change the presentation of the company’s Consolidated Statement of Income or Consolidated Balance Sheet.

FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161)  In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, which became effective for the company on January 1,quarter ending September 30, 2009. This standard amendsestablished the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) system as the single authoritative source of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.FAS 161 requires disclosures related to objectives and strategies for using derivatives; the fair-value amounts of, and gains and losses on, derivative instruments; and credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The company’s disclosures for derivative instruments will

be expanded to include a tabular representationsuperseded existing literature of the location and fair value amountsFASB, Emerging Issues Task Force, American Institute of derivative instruments on the balance sheet, fair value gains and losses on the income statement and gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges recognized in earningsCPAs and other comprehensive income.sources. The ASC did not change GAAP, but organized the literature into about 90 accounting Topics. Adoption of the ASC did not affect the company’s accounting.

     FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, Employer’s Disclosures aboutAbout Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1) In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, which becomeswas subsequently codified into ASC 715,Compensation – Retirement Benefits,and became effective with the company’s reporting at December 31, 2009. This standard amendsamended and expandsexpanded the disclosure requirements onfor the plan assets of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plansplans. Refer to provide usersinformation beginning on page FS-52 in Note 21, Employee Benefits, for these disclosures.
Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860), Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16) The FASB issued ASU 2009-16 in December 2009. This standard became effective for the company on January 1, 2010. ASU 2009-16


FS-21


changes how companies account for transfers of financial statements withassets and eliminates the concept of qualifying special-purpose entities. Adoption of the guidance is not expected to have an understanding of: how investment allocation decisions are made; the major categories of plan assets; the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; the effect of fair-value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The company does not prefund its other postretirement plan obligations, and the effectimpact on the company’s disclosuresresults of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Consolidation (ASC 810), Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved With Variable Interest Entities(ASU 2009-17) The FASB issued ASU 2009-17 in December 2009. This standard became effective for its pension plan assets asthe company January 1, 2010. ASU 2009-17 requires the enterprise to qualitatively assess if it is the primary beneficiary of a resultvariable-interest entity (VIE), and, if so, the VIE must be consolidated. Adoption of the adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will dependstandard is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s plan assets at that time.results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (ASC 932), Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures (ASU 2010-03) In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-03, which became effective for the company on December 31, 2009. The standard amends certain sections of ASC 932,Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas,to align them with the requirements in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s final rule,Modernization of the Oil and Gas Reporting Requirements(the final rule). The final rule was issued on December 31, 2008. Refer to Table V – Reserve Quantity Information, beginning on page FS-69, for additional information on the final rule and the impact of adoption.


FS-22


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

FS-23


Quarterly Results and Stock Market Data


Unaudited

                                                            
 2008 2007  2009 2008 
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 4th Q 3rd Q 2nd Q 1st Q 4th Q 3rd Q 2nd Q 1st Q  4th Q 3rd Q 2nd Q 1st Q 4th Q 3rd Q 2nd Q 1st Q 
        
Revenues and Other Income
      
Sales and other operating revenues1
 $43,145 $76,192 $80,962 $64,659   $59,900 $53,545 $54,344 $46,302  $47,588 $45,180 $39,647 $34,987   $43,145 $76,192 $80,962 $64,659 
Income from equity affiliates 886 1,673 1,563 1,244   1,153 1,160 894 937  898 1,072 735 611   886 1,673 1,563 1,244 
Other income 1,172 1,002 464 43   357 468 856 988  190 373  (177) 532   1,172 1,002 464 43 
        
Total Revenues and Other Income
 45,203 78,867 82,989 65,946   61,410 55,173 56,094 48,227  48,676 46,625 40,205 36,130   45,203 78,867 82,989 65,946 
        
Costs and Other Deductions
      
Purchased crude oil and products 23,575 49,238 56,056 42,528   38,056 33,988 33,138 28,127  28,606 26,969 23,678 20,400   23,575 49,238 56,056 42,528 
Operating expenses 5,416 5,676 5,248 4,455   4,798 4,397 4,124 3,613  4,899 4,403 4,209 4,346   5,416 5,676 5,248 4,455 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 1,492 1,278 1,639 1,347   1,833 1,446 1,516 1,131  1,330 1,177 1,043 977   1,492 1,278 1,639 1,347 
Exploration expenses 338 271 307 253   449 295 273 306  281 242 438 381   338 271 307 253 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 2,589 2,449 2,275 2,215   2,094 2,495 2,156 1,963  3,156 2,988 3,099 2,867   2,589 2,449 2,275 2,215 
Taxes other than on income1
 4,547 5,614 5,699 5,443   5,560 5,538 5,743 5,425  4,583 4,644 4,386 3,978   4,547 5,614 5,699 5,443 
Interest and debt expense       7 22 63 74   14 6 8       
Minority interests 6 32 34 28   35 25 19 28 
        
Total Costs and Other Deductions
 37,963 64,558 71,258 56,269   52,832 48,206 47,032 40,667  42,855 40,437 36,859 32,957   37,957 64,526 71,224 56,241 
        
Income Before Income Tax Expense
 7,240 14,309 11,731 9,677   8,578 6,967 9,062 7,560  5,821 6,188 3,346 3,173   7,246 14,341 11,765 9,705 
Income Tax Expense
 2,345 6,416 5,756 4,509   3,703 3,249 3,682 2,845  2,719 2,342 1,585 1,319   2,345 6,416 5,756 4,509 
        
Net Income
 $4,895 $7,893 $5,975 $5,168   $4,875 $3,718 $5,380 $4,715  $3,102 $3,846 $1,761 $1,854   $4,901 $7,925 $6,009 $5,196 
        
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 32 15 16 17   6 32 34 28 
   
Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation
 $3,070 $3,831 $1,745 $1,837   $4,895 $7,893 $5,975 $5,168 
   
Per-Share of Common Stock
      
Net Income
   
Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation
   
– Basic
 $2.45 $3.88 $2.91 $2.50   $2.34 $1.77 $2.52 $2.20  $1.54 $1.92 $0.88 $0.92   $2.45 $3.88 $2.91 $2.50 
– Diluted
 $2.44 $3.85 $2.90 $2.48   $2.32 $1.75 $2.52 $2.18  $1.53 $1.92 $0.87 $0.92   $2.44 $3.85 $2.90 $2.48 
        
Dividends
 $0.65 $0.65 $0.65 $0.58   $0.58 $0.58 $0.58 $0.52  $0.68 $0.68 $0.65 $0.65   $0.65 $0.65 $0.65 $0.58 
Common Stock Price Range – High2
 $82.20 $99.08 $103.09 $94.61   $94.86 $94.84 $84.24 $74.95  $79.64 $72.64 $72.67 $77.35   $82.20 $99.08 $103.09 $94.61 
– Low2
 $57.83 $77.50 $86.74 $77.51   $83.79 $80.76 $74.83 $66.43  $68.14 $61.40 $63.75 $56.46   $57.83 $77.50 $86.74 $77.51 
       
   
1 Includes excise, value-added and similar taxes:
 $2,080 $2,577 $2,652 $2,537 $2,548 $2,550 $2,609 $2,414  $2,086 $2,079 $2,034 $1,910 $2,080 $2,577 $2,652 $2,537 
2 End of day price.
  

The company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (trading symbol: CVX). As of February 20, 2009,19, 2010, stockholders of record numbered approximately 205,000.195,000. There are no restrictions on the company’s ability to pay dividends.

FS-24


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

To the Stockholders of Chevron Corporation
Management of Chevron is responsible for preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related information appearing in this report. The statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and fairly represent the transactions and financial position of the company. The financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgment.
     As stated in its report included herein, the independent registered public accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited the company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
     The Board of Directors of Chevron has an Audit Committee composed of directors who are not officers or employees of the company. The Audit Committee meets regularly with members of management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review accounting, internal control, auditing and financial reporting matters. Both the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm have free and direct access to the Audit Committee without the presence of management.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on theInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the results of this evaluation, the company’s management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.
     The effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report included herein.
     
  
David J. O’Reilly
John S. Watson
 Patricia E. Yarrington Mark A. Humphrey
Chairman of the Board Vice President Vice President
and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller

February 26, 2009

25, 2010

FS-25


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Chevron Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Chevron Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20082009 and December 31, 20072008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20082009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20082009 based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and

testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

     As discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for buy/sell contracts on April 1, 2006.
     As discussed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain income tax positions on January 1, 2007.
     A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
February 26, 200925, 2010



FS-26


Consolidated Statement of Income


Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Revenues and Other Income
             
Sales and other operating revenues1,2
 $264,958   $214,091  $204,892 
Income from equity affiliates  5,366    4,144   4,255 
Other income  2,681    2,669   971 
     
Total Revenues and Other Income
  273,005    220,904   210,118 
     
Costs and Other Deductions
             
Purchased crude oil and products2
  171,397    133,309   128,151 
Operating expenses  20,795    16,932   14,624 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  5,756    5,926   5,093 
Exploration expenses  1,169    1,323   1,364 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  9,528    8,708   7,506 
Taxes other than on income1
  21,303    22,266   20,883 
Interest and debt expense      166   451 
Minority interests  100    107   70 
     
Total Costs and Other Deductions
  230,048    188,737   178,142 
     
Income Before Income Tax Expense
  42,957    32,167   31,976 
Income Tax Expense
  19,026    13,479   14,838 
     
Net Income
 $23,931   $18,688  $17,138 
     
Per-Share of Common Stock
             
Net Income
             
– Basic
 $11.74   $8.83  $7.84 
– Diluted
 $11.67   $8.77  $7.80 
     
    
1 Includes excise, value-added and similar taxes.
 $9,846   $10,121  $9,551 
2 Includes amounts in revenues for buy/sell contracts; associated costs are in “Purchased crude oil and products.”
Refer also to Note 14, on page FS-43.
 $   $  $6,725 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-27


Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Millions of dollars

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Net Income
 $23,931   $18,688  $17,138 
     
Currency translation adjustment             
Unrealized net change arising during period  (112)   31   55 
     
Unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities             
Net (loss) gain arising during period  (6)   17   (88)
Reclassification to net income of net realized loss      2    
     
Total  (6)   19   (88)
     
Derivatives             
Net derivatives gain (loss) on hedge transactions  139    (10)  2 
Reclassification to net income of net realized loss  32    7   95 
Income taxes on derivatives transactions  (61)   (3)  (30)
     
Total  110    (6)  67 
     
Defined benefit plans             
Minimum pension liability adjustment         (88)
Actuarial loss             
Amortization to net income of net actuarial loss  483    356    
Actuarial (loss) gain arising during period  (3,228)   530    
Prior service cost             
Amortization to net income of net prior service credits  (64)   (15)   
Prior service (credit) cost arising during period  (32)   204    
Defined benefit plans sponsored by equity affiliates  (97)   19    
Income taxes on defined benefit plans  1,037    (409)  50 
     
Total  (1,901)   685   (38)
     
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Gain, Net of Tax
  (1,909)   729   (4)
     
Comprehensive Income
 $22,022   $19,417  $17,134 
     

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-28


Consolidated Balance Sheet
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
Assets
         
Cash and cash equivalents $9,347   $7,362 
Marketable securities  213    732 
Accounts and notes receivable (less allowance: 2008 – $246; 2007 – $165)  15,856    22,446 
Inventories:         
Crude oil and petroleum products  5,175    4,003 
Chemicals  459    290 
Materials, supplies and other  1,220    1,017 
       
Total inventories  6,854    5,310 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  4,200    3,527 
     
Total Current Assets
  36,470    39,377 
Long-term receivables, net  2,413    2,194 
Investments and advances  20,920    20,477 
Properties, plant and equipment, at cost  173,299    154,084 
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  81,519    75,474 
       
Properties, plant and equipment, net  91,780    78,610 
Deferred charges and other assets  4,711    3,491 
Goodwill  4,619    4,637 
Assets held for sale  252     
     
Total Assets
 $161,165   $148,786 
     
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
         
Short-term debt $2,818   $1,162 
Accounts payable  16,580    21,756 
Accrued liabilities  8,077    5,275 
Federal and other taxes on income  3,079    3,972 
Other taxes payable  1,469    1,633 
     
Total Current Liabilities
  32,023    33,798 
Long-term debt  5,742    5,664 
Capital lease obligations  341    406 
Deferred credits and other noncurrent obligations  17,678    15,007 
Noncurrent deferred income taxes  11,539    12,170 
Reserves for employee benefit plans  6,725    4,449 
Minority interests  469    204 
     
Total Liabilities
  74,517    71,698 
     
Preferred stock (authorized 100,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value; none issued)       
Common stock (authorized 6,000,000,000 shares at December 31, 2008, and 4,000,000,000 at December 31, 2007; $0.75 par value; 2,442,676,580 shares issued at December 31, 2008 and 2007)  1,832    1,832 
Capital in excess of par value  14,448    14,289 
Retained earnings  101,102    82,329 
Notes receivable – key employees      (1)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (3,924)   (2,015)
Deferred compensation and benefit plan trust  (434)   (454)
Treasury stock, at cost (2008 – 438,444,795 shares; 2007 – 352,242,618 shares)  (26,376)   (18,892)
     
Total Stockholders’ Equity
  86,648    77,088 
     
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
 $161,165   $148,786 
     

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-29


Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Millions of dollars

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Operating Activities
             
Net income $23,931   $18,688  $17,138 
Adjustments             
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  9,528    8,708   7,506 
Dry hole expense  375    507   520 
Distributions less than income from equity affiliates  (440)   (1,439)  (979)
Net before-tax gains on asset retirements and sales  (1,358)   (2,315)  (229)
Net foreign currency effects  (355)   378   259 
Deferred income tax provision  598    261   614 
Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital  (1,673)   685   1,044 
Minority interest in net income  100    107   70 
Increase in long-term receivables  (161)   (82)  (900)
(Increase) decrease in other deferred charges  (84)   (530)  232 
Cash contributions to employee pension plans  (839)   (317)  (449)
Other  10    326   (503)
     
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
  29,632    24,977   24,323 
     
Investing Activities
             
Capital expenditures  (19,666)   (16,678)  (13,813)
Repayment of loans by equity affiliates  179    21   463 
Proceeds from asset sales  1,491    3,338   989 
Net sales of marketable securities  483    185   142 
Net sales (purchases) of other short-term investments  432    (799)   
     
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities
  (17,081)   (13,933)  (12,219)
     
Financing Activities
             
Net borrowings (payments) of short-term obligations  2,647    (345)  (677)
Repayments of long-term debt and other financing obligations  (965)   (3,343)  (2,224)
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt      650    
Cash dividends – common stock  (5,162)   (4,791)  (4,396)
Dividends paid to minority interests  (99)   (77)  (60)
Net purchases of treasury shares  (6,821)   (6,389)  (4,491)
     
Net Cash Used for Financing Activities
  (10,400)   (14,295)  (11,848)
     
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
  (166)   120   194 
     
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  1,985    (3,131)  450 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at January 1
  7,362    10,493   10,043 
     
Cash and Cash Equivalents at December 31
 $9,347   $7,362  $10,493 
     

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-30


Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

Shares in thousands; amounts in millions of dollars

                          
  2008   2007  2006 
  Shares  Amount   Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 
     
Preferred Stock
    $      $     $ 
     
Common Stock
                         
Balance at January 1  2,442,677  $1,832    2,442,677  $1,832   2,442,677  $1,832 
Balance at December 31
  2,442,677  $1,832    2,442,677  $1,832   2,442,677  $1,832 
     
Capital in Excess of Par
                         
Balance at January 1     $14,289       $14,126      $13,894 
Treasury stock transactions      159        163       232 
           
Balance at December 31
     $14,448       $14,289      $14,126 
     
Retained Earnings
                         
Balance at January 1     $82,329       $68,464      $55,738 
Net income      23,931        18,688       17,138 
Cash dividends on common stock      (5,162)       (4,791)      (4,396)
Adoption of EITF 04-6, “Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry”                     (19)
Adoption of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”              (35)       
Tax benefit from dividends paid on unallocated ESOP shares and other      4        3       3 
           
Balance at December 31
     $101,102       $82,329      $68,464 
     
Notes Receivable – Key Employees
     $       $(1)     $(2)
     
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
                         
Currency translation adjustment
Balance at January 1
     $(59)      $(90)     $(145)
Change during year      (112)       31       55 
           
Balance at December 31     $(171)      $(59)     $(90)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans
Balance at January 1
     $(2,008)      $(2,585)     $(344)
Change to defined benefit plans during year      (1,901)       685       (38)
Adoption of FAS 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”              (108)      (2,203)
           
Balance at December 31     $(3,909)      $(2,008)     $(2,585)
Unrealized net holding gain on securities Balance at January 1     $19       $      $88 
Change during year      (6)       19       (88)
           
Balance at December 31     $13       $19      $ 
Net derivatives gain (loss) on hedge transactions              
Balance at January 1     $33       $39      $(28)
Change during year      110        (6)      67 
           
Balance at December 31     $143       $33      $39 
           
Balance at December 31
     $(3,924)      $(2,015)     $(2,636)
     
Deferred Compensation and Benefit Plan Trust Deferred Compensation
                         
Balance at January 1     $(214)      $(214)     $(246)
Net reduction of ESOP debt and other      20               32 
           
Balance at December 31
      (194)       (214)      (214)
Benefit Plan Trust (Common Stock)
  14,168   (240)   14,168   (240)  14,168   (240)
       
Balance at December 31
  14,168  $(434)   14,168  $(454)  14,168  $(454)
     
Treasury Stock at Cost
                         
Balance at January 1  352,243  $(18,892)   278,118  $(12,395)  209,990  $(7,870)
Purchases  95,631   (8,011)   85,429   (7,036)  80,369   (5,033)
Issuances – mainly employee benefit plans  (9,429)  527    (11,304)  539   (12,241)  508 
       
Balance at December 31
  438,445  $(26,376)   352,243  $(18,892)  278,118  $(12,395)
     
Total Stockholders’ Equity at December 31
     $86,648       $77,088      $68,935 
     
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Revenues and Other Income
             
Sales and other operating revenues* $167,402   $264,958  $214,091 
Income from equity affiliates  3,316    5,366   4,144 
Other income  918    2,681   2,669 
    
Total Revenues and Other Income
  171,636    273,005   220,904 
    
Costs and Other Deductions
             
Purchased crude oil and products  99,653    171,397   133,309 
Operating expenses  17,857    20,795   16,932 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  4,527    5,756   5,926 
Exploration expenses  1,342    1,169   1,323 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  12,110    9,528   8,708 
Taxes other than on income*  17,591    21,303   22,266 
Interest and debt expense  28       166 
    
Total Costs and Other Deductions
  153,108    229,948   188,630 
    
Income Before Income Tax Expense
  18,528    43,057   32,274 
Income Tax Expense
  7,965    19,026   13,479 
    
Net Income
  10,563    24,031   18,795 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests  80    100   107 
    
Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation
 $10,483   $23,931  $18,688 
    
Per-Share of Common Stock
             
Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation
             
– Basic
 $5.26   $11.74  $8.83 
– Diluted
 $5.24   $11.67  $8.77 
    
              
*Includes excise, value-added and similar taxes. $8,109   $9,846  $10,121 
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-31FS-27


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts


Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Millions of dollars

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Net Income
 $10,563   $24,031  $18,795 
    
Currency translation adjustment             
Unrealized net change arising during period  60    (112)  31 
    
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities             
Net gain (loss) arising during period  2    (6)  17 
Reclassification to net income of net realized loss         2 
    
Total  2    (6)  19 
    
Derivatives             
Net derivatives (loss) gain on hedge transactions  (69)   139   (10)
Reclassification to net income of net realized (gain) loss  (23)   32   7 
Income taxes on derivatives transactions  32    (61)  (3)
    
Total  (60)   110   (6)
    
Defined benefit plans             
Actuarial loss             
Amortization to net income of net actuarial loss  575    483   356 
Actuarial (loss) gain arising during period  (1,099)   (3,228)  530 
Prior service cost             
Amortization to net income of net prior service credits  (65)   (64)  (15)
Prior service (cost) credit arising during period  (34)   (32)  204 
Defined benefit plans sponsored by equity affiliates  65    (97)  19 
Income taxes on defined benefit plans  159    1,037   (409)
    
Total  (399)   (1,901)  685 
    
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Gain, Net of Tax
  (397)   (1,909)  729 
    
Comprehensive Income
  10,166    22,122   19,524 
    
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (80)   (100)  (107)
    
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation
 $10,086   $22,022  $19,417 
    
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-28


Consolidated Balance Sheet
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
    
Assets
         
Cash and cash equivalents $8,716   $9,347 
Marketable securities  106    213 
Accounts and notes receivable (less allowance: 2009 – $228; 2008 – $246)  17,703    15,856 
Inventories:         
Crude oil and petroleum products  3,680    5,175 
Chemicals  383    459 
Materials, supplies and other  1,466    1,220 
    
Total inventories  5,529    6,854 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  5,162    4,200 
    
Total Current Assets
  37,216    36,470 
Long-term receivables, net  2,282    2,413 
Investments and advances  21,158    20,920 
Properties, plant and equipment, at cost  188,288    173,299 
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  91,820    81,519 
    
Properties, plant and equipment, net  96,468    91,780 
Deferred charges and other assets  2,879    4,711 
Goodwill  4,618    4,619 
Assets held for sale      252 
    
Total Assets
 $164,621   $161,165 
    
Liabilities and Equity
         
Short-term debt $384   $2,818 
Accounts payable  16,437    16,580 
Accrued liabilities  5,375    8,077 
Federal and other taxes on income  2,624    3,079 
Other taxes payable  1,391    1,469 
    
Total Current Liabilities
  26,211    32,023 
Long-term debt  9,829    5,742 
Capital lease obligations  301    341 
Deferred credits and other noncurrent obligations  17,390    17,678 
Noncurrent deferred income taxes  11,521    11,539 
Reserves for employee benefit plans  6,808    6,725 
    
Total Liabilities
  72,060    74,048 
    
Preferred stock (authorized 100,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value; none issued)       
Common stock (authorized 6,000,000,000 shares; $0.75 par value; 2,442,676,580 shares
issued at December 31, 2009 and 2008)
  1,832    1,832 
Capital in excess of par value  14,631    14,448 
Retained earnings  106,289    101,102 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (4,321)   (3,924)
Deferred compensation and benefit plan trust  (349)   (434)
Treasury stock, at cost (2009 – 434,954,774 shares; 2008 – 438,444,795 shares)  (26,168)   (26,376)
    
Total Chevron Corporation Stockholders’ Equity
  91,914    86,648 
    
Noncontrolling interests  647    469 
    
Total Equity
  92,561    87,117 
    
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $164,621   $161,165 
    
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-29


Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Millions of dollars

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Operating Activities
             
Net Income $10,563   $24,031  $18,795 
Adjustments             
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  12,110    9,528   8,708 
Dry hole expense  552    375   507 
Distributions less than income from equity affiliates  (103)   (440)  (1,439)
Net before-tax gains on asset retirements and sales  (1,255)   (1,358)  (2,315)
Net foreign currency effects  466    (355)  378 
Deferred income tax provision  467    598   261 
Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital  (2,301)   (1,673)  685 
Increase in long-term receivables  (258)   (161)  (82)
Decrease (increase) in other deferred charges  201    (84)  (530)
Cash contributions to employee pension plans  (1,739)   (839)  (317)
Other  670    10   326 
    
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
  19,373    29,632   24,977 
    
Investing Activities
             
Capital expenditures  (19,843)   (19,666)  (16,678)
Proceeds and deposits related to asset sales  2,564    1,491   3,338 
Net sales of marketable securities  127    483   185 
Repayment of loans by equity affiliates  336    179   21 
Net sales (purchases) of other short-term investments  244    432   (799)
    
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities
  (16,572)   (17,081)  (13,933)
    
Financing Activities
             
Net (payments) borrowings of short-term obligations  (3,192)   2,647   (345)
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt  5,347       650 
Repayments of long-term debt and other financing obligations  (496)   (965)  (3,343)
Cash dividends – common stock  (5,302)   (5,162)  (4,791)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests  (71)   (99)  (77)
Net sales (purchases) of treasury shares  168    (6,821)  (6,389)
    
Net Cash Used for Financing Activities
  (3,546)   (10,400)  (14,295)
    
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes
on Cash and Cash Equivalents
  114    (166)  120 
    
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  (631)   1,985   (3,131)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at January 1
  9,347    7,362   10,493 
    
Cash and Cash Equivalents at December 31
 $8,716   $9,347  $7,362 
    
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-30


Consolidated Statement of Equity
Shares in thousands; amounts in millions of dollars

                          
      2009       2008      2007 
       
  Shares  Amount   Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 
    
Preferred Stock
    $      $     $ 
    
Common Stock
  2,442,677  $1,832    2,442,677  $1,832   2,442,677  $1,832 
    
Capital in Excess of Par
                         
Balance at January 1     $14,448       $14,289      $14,126 
Treasury stock transactions      183        159       163 
          
Balance at December 31
     $14,631       $14,448      $14,289 
    
Retained Earnings
                         
Balance at January 1     $101,102       $82,329      $68,464 
Net income attributable to Chevron Corporation      10,483        23,931       18,688 
Cash dividends on common stock      (5,302)       (5,162)      (4,791)
Adoption of new accounting standard for uncertain
income tax positions
                     (35)
Tax benefit from dividends paid on
unallocated ESOP shares and other
      6        4       3 
          
Balance at December 31
     $106,289       $101,102      $82,329 
    
Notes Receivable – Key Employees
     $       $      $(1)
    
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
                         
Currency translation adjustment                         
Balance at January 1     $(171)      $(59)     $(90)
Change during year      60        (112)      31 
          
Balance at December 31     $(111)      $(171)     $(59)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans                         
Balance at January 1     $(3,909)      $(2,008)     $(2,585)
Change to defined benefit plans during year      (399)       (1,901)      685 
Adoption of new accounting standard
for defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plans
                     (108)
          
Balance at December 31     $(4,308)      $(3,909)     $(2,008)
Unrealized net holding gain on securities                         
Balance at January 1     $13       $19      $ 
Change during year      2        (6)      19 
          
Balance at December 31     $15       $13      $19 
Net derivatives gain (loss) on hedge transactions                         
Balance at January 1     $143       $33      $39 
Change during year      (60)       110       (6)
          
Balance at December 31     $83       $143      $33 
          
Balance at December 31
     $(4,321)      $(3,924)     $(2,015)
    
Deferred Compensation and Benefit Plan Trust
                         
Deferred Compensation
                         
Balance at January 1     $(194)      $(214)     $(214)
Net reduction of ESOP debt and other      85        20        
          
Balance at December 31
      (109)       (194)      (214)
Benefit Plan Trust (Common Stock)
  14,168   (240)   14,168   (240)  14,168   (240)
      
Balance at December 31
  14,168  $(349)   14,168  $(434)  14,168  $(454)
    
Treasury Stock at Cost
                         
Balance at January 1  438,445  $(26,376)   352,243  $(18,892)  278,118  $(12,395)
Purchases  85   (6)   95,631   (8,011)  85,429   (7,036)
Issuances – mainly employee benefit plans  (3,575)  214    (9,429)  527   (11,304)  539 
      
Balance at December 31
  434,955  $(26,168)   438,445  $(26,376)  352,243  $(18,892)
    
Total Chevron Corporation Stockholders’ Equity
at December 31
     $91,914       $86,648      $77,088 
    
Noncontrolling Interests
     $647       $469      $204 
    
Total Equity
     $92,561       $87,117      $77,292 
    
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



FS-31




Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts


Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
GeneralExploration and production (upstream) operations consist of exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas and marketing natural gas. Refining, marketing and transportation (downstream) operations relate to refining crude oil into finished petroleum products; marketing crude oil and the many products derived from petroleum; and transporting crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products by pipeline, marine vessel, motor equipment and rail car. Chemical operations include the manufacture and marketing of commodity petrochemicals, plastics for industrial uses, and fuel and lubricant oil additives.
     The company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements, as well as amounts included in the notes thereto, including discussion and disclosure of contingent liabilities. Although the company uses its best estimates and judgments, actual results could differ from these estimates as future confirming events occur.
     The nature of the company’s operations and the many countries in which it operates subject the company to changing economic, regulatory and political conditions. The company does not believe it is vulnerable to the risk of near-term severe impact as a result of any concentration of its activities.

Subsidiary and Affiliated CompaniesThe Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of controlled subsidiary companies more than 50 percent-owned and variable-interest entities in which the company is the primary beneficiary. Undivided interests in oil and gas joint ventures and certain other assets are consolidated on a proportionate basis. Investments in and advances to affiliates in which the company has a substantial ownership interest of approximately 20 percent to 50 percent or for which the company exercises significant influence but not control over policy decisions are accounted for by the equity method. As part of that accounting, the company recognizes gains and losses that arise from the issuance of stock by an affiliate that results in changes in the company’s proportionate share of the dollar amount of the affiliate’s equity currently in income.
     Investments are assessed for possible impairment when events indicate that the fair value of the investment may be below the company’s carrying value. When such a condition is deemed to be other than temporary, the carrying value of the investment is written down to its fair value, and the amount of the write-down is included in net income. In making the determination as to whether a decline is other than temporary, the company considers such factors as the
duration and extent of the decline, the investee’s financial

performance, and the company’s ability and intention to retain its investment for a period that will be sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the investment’s market value. The new cost basis of investments in these equity investees is not changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value.

     Differences between the company’s carrying value of an equity investment and its underlying equity in the net assets of the affiliate are assigned to the extent practicable to specific assets and liabilities based on the company’s analysis of the various factors giving rise to the difference. When appropriate, the company’s share of the affiliate’s reported earnings is adjusted quarterly to reflect the difference between these allocated values and the affiliate’s historical book values.

DerivativesThe majority of the company’s activity in derivative commodity instruments is intended to manage the financial risk posed by physical transactions. For some of this derivative activity, generally limited to large, discrete or infrequently occurring transactions, the company may elect to apply fair value or cash flow hedge accounting. For other similar derivative instruments, generally because of the short-term nature of the contracts or their limited use, the company does not apply hedge accounting, and changes in the fair value of those contracts are reflected in current income. For the company’s commodity trading activity and foreign currency exposures, gains and losses from derivative instruments are reported in current income. Interest rate swaps – hedging a portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt – are accounted for as fair value hedges, whereas interest rate swaps relating to a portion of the company’s floating-rate debt are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. Where Chevron is a party to master netting arrangements, fair value receivable and payable amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty are offset on the balance sheet.

Short-Term InvestmentsAll short-term investments are classified as available for sale and are in highly liquid debt securities. Those investments that are part of the company’s cash management portfolio and have original maturities of three months or less are reported as “Cash equivalents.” The balance of the short-term investments is reported as “Marketable securities” and is marked-to-market, with any unrealized gains or losses included in “Other comprehensive income.”

InventoriesCrude oil, petroleum products and chemicals are generally stated at cost, using a Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method. In the aggregate, these costs are below market. “Materials, supplies and other” inventories generally are stated at average cost.



FS-32





Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued

Properties, Plant and EquipmentThe successful efforts method is used for crude-oil and natural-gas exploration and production activities. All costs for development wells, related plant and equipment, proved mineral interests in crude oil and natural gas properties, and related asset retirement obligation (ARO) assets are capitalized. Costs of exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether the wells found proved reserves. Costs of wells that are assigned proved reserves remain capitalized. Costs also are capitalized for exploratory wells that have found crude-oil and natural gas reserves even if the reserves cannot be classified as proved when the drilling is completed, provided the exploratory well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and the company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. All other exploratory wells and costs are expensed. Refer to Note 19, beginning on page FS-50, for additional discussion of accounting for suspended exploratory well costs.
     Long-lived assets to be held and used, including proved crude-oil and natural-gas properties, are assessed for possible impairment by comparing their carrying values with their associated undiscounted future net before-tax cash flows. Events that can trigger assessments for possible impairments include write-downs of proved reserves based on field performance, significant decreases in the market value of an asset, significant change in the extent or manner of use of or a physical change in an asset, and a more-likely-than-not expectation that a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly sooner than the end of its previously estimated useful life. Impaired assets are written down to their estimated fair values, generally their discounted future net before-tax cash flows. For proved crude-oil and natural-gas properties in the United States, the company generally performs the impairment review on an individual field basis. Outside the United States, reviews are performed on a country, concession, development area or field basis, as appropriate. In the refining, marketing, transportation and chemicals areas, impairment reviews are generally done on the basis of a refinery, a plant, a marketing area or marketing assets by country. Impairment amounts are recorded as incremental “Depreciation, depletion and amortization” expense.
     Long-lived assets that are held for sale are evaluated for possible impairment by comparing the carrying value of the asset with its fair value less the cost to sell. If the net book value exceeds the fair value less cost to sell, the asset is considered impaired and adjusted to the lower value.
     As required under accounting standards for asset retirement and environmental obligations (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 410), the fair value of a liability for an ARO is recorded as an asset and a liability when there is a
legal obligation associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Refer also to Note 23, on page FS-60, relating to AROs.
     Depreciation and depletion of all capitalized costs of proved crude-oil and natural-gas producing properties, except mineral interests, are expensed using the unit-of-production method generally by individual field, as the proved developed reserves are produced. Depletion expenses for capitalized costs of proved mineral interests are recognized using the unit-of-production method by individual field as the related proved reserves are produced. Periodic valuation provisions for impairment of capitalized costs of unproved mineral interests are expensed.
     Depreciation and depletion expenses for mining assets are determined using the unit-of-production method as the proved reserves are produced. The capitalized costs of all other plant and equipment are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful lives. In general, the declining-balance method is used to depreciate plant and equipment in the United States; the straight-line method generally is used to depreciate international plant and equipment and to amortize all capitalized leased assets.
     Gains or losses are not recognized for normal retirements of properties, plant and equipment subject to composite group amortization or depreciation. Gains or losses from abnormal retirements are recorded as expenses and from sales as “Other income.”
     Expenditures for maintenance (including those for planned major maintenance projects), repairs and minor renewals to maintain facilities in operating condition are generally expensed as incurred. Major replacements and renewals are capitalized.
GoodwillGoodwill resulting from a business combination is not subject to amortization. As required by accounting standards for goodwill (ASC 350), the company tests such goodwill at the reporting unit level for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
Environmental ExpendituresEnvironmental expenditures that relate to ongoing operations or to conditions caused by past operations are expensed. Expenditures that create future benefits or contribute to future revenue generation are capitalized.
     Liabilities related to future remediation costs are recorded when environmental assessments or cleanups or both are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For the company’s U.S. and Canadian marketing facilities, the accrual is based in part on the probability that a future remediation commitment will be required. For crude-oil, natural-gas and mineral-producing properties, a liability for an ARO is made,

Properties, Plant and Equipment  The successful efforts method is used for crude oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. All costs for development wells, related plant and equipment, proved mineral interests in crude oil and natural gas properties, and related asset retirement obligation (ARO) assets are capitalized. Costs of exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether the wells found proved reserves. Costs of wells that are assigned proved reserves remain capitalized. Costs also are capitalized for exploratory wells that have found crude oil and natural gas reserves even if the reserves cannot be classified as proved when the drilling is completed, provided the exploratory well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and the company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. All other exploratory wells and costs are expensed. Refer to Note 20, beginning on page FS-48, for additional discussion of accounting for suspended exploratory well costs.
     Long-lived assets to be held and used, including proved crude oil and natural gas properties, are assessed for possible impairment by comparing their carrying values with their associated undiscounted future net before-tax cash flows. Events that can trigger assessments for possible impairments include write-downs of proved reserves based on field performance, significant decreases in the market value of an asset, significant change in the extent or manner of use of or a physical change in an asset, and a more-likely-than-not expectation that a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly sooner than the end of its previously estimated useful life. Impaired assets are written down to their estimated fair values, generally their discounted future net before-tax cash flows. For proved crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States, the company generally performs the impairment review on an individual field basis. Outside the United States, reviews are performed on a country, concession, development area or field basis, as appropriate. In the refining, marketing, transportation and chemical areas, impairment reviews are generally done on the basis of a refinery, a plant, a marketing area or marketing assets by country. Impairment amounts are recorded as incremental “Depreciation, depletion and amortization” expense.
     Long-lived assets that are held for sale are evaluated for possible impairment by comparing the carrying value of the asset with its fair value less the cost to sell. If the net book value exceeds the fair value less cost to sell, the asset is considered impaired and adjusted to the lower value.
     As required under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations(FAS 143), the fair value of a liability for an ARO is recorded as an asset and a liability when there is a

legal obligation associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Refer also to Note 24, beginning on page FS-58, relating to AROs.

     Depreciation and depletion of all capitalized costs of proved crude oil and natural gas producing properties, except mineral interests, are expensed using the unit-of-production method generally by individual field, as the proved developed reserves are produced. Depletion expenses for capitalized costs of proved mineral interests are recognized using the unit-of-production method by individual field as the related proved reserves are produced. Periodic valuation provisions for impairment of capitalized costs of unproved mineral interests are expensed.
     Depreciation and depletion expenses for mining assets are determined using the unit-of-production method as the proved reserves are produced. The capitalized costs of all other plant and equipment are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful lives. In general, the declining-balance method is used to depreciate plant and equipment in the United States; the straight-line method generally is used to depreciate international plant and equipment and to amortize all capitalized leased assets.
     Gains or losses are not recognized for normal retirements of properties, plant and equipment subject to composite group amortization or depreciation. Gains or losses from abnormal retirements are recorded as expenses and from sales as “Other income.”
     Expenditures for maintenance (including those for planned major maintenance projects), repairs and minor renewals to maintain facilities in operating condition are generally expensed as incurred. Major replacements and renewals are capitalized.

Goodwill  Goodwill resulting from a business combination is not subject to amortization. As required by FASB Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the company tests such goodwill at the reporting unit level for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

Environmental Expenditures  Environmental expenditures that relate to ongoing operations or to conditions caused by past operations are expensed. Expenditures that create future benefits or contribute to future revenue generation are capitalized.

     Liabilities related to future remediation costs are recorded when environmental assessments or cleanups or both are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For the company’s U.S. and Canadian marketing facilities, the accrual is based in part on the probability that a future remediation commitment will be required. For crude oil, natural gas and



FS-33


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued

following accounting standards for asset retirement and environmental obligations. Refer to Note 23, on page FS-60, for a discussion of the company’s AROs.
     For federal Superfund sites and analogous sites under state laws, the company records a liability for its designated share of the probable and estimable costs and probable amounts for other potentially responsible parties when mandated by the regulatory agencies because the other parties are not able to pay their respective shares.
     The gross amount of environmental liabilities is based on the company’s best estimate of future costs using currently available technology and applying current regulations and the company’s own internal environmental policies. Future amounts are not discounted. Recoveries or reimbursements are recorded as assets when receipt is reasonably assured.
Currency TranslationThe U.S. dollar is the functional currency for substantially all of the company’s consolidated operations and those of its equity affiliates. For those operations, all gains and losses from currency translations are currently included in income. The cumulative translation effects for those few entities, both consolidated and affiliated, using functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are included in “Currency translation adjustment” on the Consolidated Statement of Equity.
Revenue RecognitionRevenues associated with sales of crude oil, natural gas, coal, petroleum and chemicals products, and all other sources are recorded when title passes to the customer, net of royalties, discounts and allowances, as applicable. Revenues from natural gas production from properties in which Chevron has an interest with other producers are generally recognized on the entitlement method. Excise, value-added and similar taxes assessed by a governmental authority on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer are presented on a gross basis. The associated amounts are shown as a footnote to the Consolidated Statement of Income on page FS-27. Purchases and sales of inventory with the same counterparty that are entered into in contemplation of one another (including buy/sell arrangements) are combined and recorded on a net basis and reported in “Purchased crude oil and products” on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Stock Options and Other Share-Based CompensationThe company issues stock options and other share-based compensation to its employees and accounts for these transactions under the accounting standards for share-based compensation (ASC 718). For equity awards, such as stock options, total compensation cost is based on the grant date fair value
and for liability awards, such as stock appreciation rights, total compensation cost is based on the settlement value. The company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for all awards over the service period required to earn the award, which is the shorter of the vesting period or the time period an employee becomes eligible to retain the award at retirement. Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan have graded vesting provisions by which one-third of each award vests on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The company amortizes these graded awards on a straight-line basis.
Note 2
Noncontrolling Interests
The company adopted accounting standards for noncontrolling interests (ASC 810) in the consolidated financial statements effective January 1, 2009, and retroactive to the earliest period presented. Ownership interests in the company’s subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent are presented separately from the parent’s equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interests are both presented on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Income. The term “earnings” is defined as “Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation.”
     
Activity for the equity attributable to noncontrolling interests for 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
              
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Balance at January 1 $   469     $   204  $   209 
Net income  80    100   107 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests  (71)   (99)  (77)
Other changes, net  169    264   (35)
    
Balance at December 31 $647     $469  $204 
    
Note 3
Equity
Retained earnings at December 31, 2009 and 2008, included approximately $8,122 and $7,951, respectively, for the company’s share of undistributed earnings of equity affiliates.
     At December 31, 2009, about 94 million shares of Chevron’s common stock remained available for issuance from the 160 million shares that were reserved for issuance under the Chevron Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). In addition, approximately 342,000 shares remain available for issuance from the 800,000 shares of the company’s common stock that were reserved for awards under the Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan (Non-Employee Directors’ Plan).

mineral producing properties, a liability for an ARO is made, following FAS 143. Refer to Note 24, beginning on page FS-58, for a discussion of FAS 143.
     For federal Superfund sites and analogous sites under state laws, the company records a liability for its designated share of the probable and estimable costs and probable amounts for other potentially responsible parties when mandated by the regulatory agencies because the other parties are not able to pay their respective shares.
     The gross amount of environmental liabilities is based on the company’s best estimate of future costs using currently available technology and applying current regulations and the company’s own internal environmental policies. Future amounts are not discounted. Recoveries or reimbursements are recorded as assets when receipt is reasonably assured.

Currency Translation  The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for substantially all of the company’s consolidated operations and those of its equity affiliates. For those operations, all gains and losses from currency translations are currently included in income. The cumulative translation effects for those few entities, both consolidated and affiliated, using functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are included in the currency translation adjustment in “Stockholders’ Equity.”

Revenue Recognition  Revenues associated with sales of crude oil, natural gas, coal, petroleum and chemicals products, and all other sources are recorded when title passes to the customer, net of royalties, discounts and allowances, as applicable. Revenues from natural gas production from properties in which Chevron has an interest with other producers are generally recognized on the basis of the company’s net working interest (entitlement method). Excise, value-added and similar taxes assessed by a governmental authority on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer are presented on a gross basis. The associated amounts are shown as a footnote to the Consolidated Statement of Income on page FS-27. Refer to Note 14, on page FS-43, for a discussion of the accounting for buy/sell arrangements.

Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation  The company issues stock options and other share-based compensation to its employees and accounts for these transactions under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 123R,Share-Based Payment(FAS 123R). For equity awards, such as stock options, total compensation cost is based on the grant date fair value and for liability awards, such as stock appreciation rights, total compensation cost is based on the settlement

value. The company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for all awards over the service period required to earn the award, which is the shorter of the vesting period or the time period an employee becomes eligible to retain the award at retirement. Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan have graded vesting provisions by which one-third of each award vests on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The company amortizes these newly issued graded awards on a straight-line basis.
     Tax benefits of deductions from the exercise of stock options are presented as financing cash inflows in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Refer to Note 21, beginning on page FS-49 for a description of the company’s share-based compensation plans and information related to awards granted under those plans and Note 2, which follows, for information on excess tax benefits reported on the company’s Statement of Cash Flows.

Note 2

Information Relating to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital was composed of the following:             
Decrease (increase) in accounts and notes receivable $6,030   $(3,867) $17 
Increase in inventories  (1,545)   (749)  (536)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets  (621)   (370)  (31)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (4,628)   4,930   1,246 
(Decrease) increase in income and other taxes payable  (909)   741   348 
     
Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital $(1,673)  $685  $1,044 
     
Net cash provided by operating activities includes the following cash payments for interest and income taxes:             
Interest paid on debt (net of capitalized interest) $   $203  $470 
Income taxes $19,130   $12,340  $13,806 
     
Net sales of marketable securities consisted of the following gross amounts:             
Marketable securities sold $3,719   $2,160  $1,413 
Marketable securities purchased  (3,236)   (1,975)  (1,271)
     
Net sales of marketable securities $483   $185  $142 
     



FS-34


     The major components of “Capital expenditures” and the reconciliation of this amount to the reported capital and exploratory expenditures, including equity affiliates, are presented in the following table:



Note 24
Information Relating to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Net (increase) decrease in operating working
capital was composed of the following:
             
(Increase) decrease in accounts and
notes receivable
 (1,476)   $ 6,030  (3,867)
Decrease (increase) in inventories  1,213    (1,545)  (749)
Increase in prepaid expenses and
other current assets
  (264)   (621)  (370)
(Decrease) increase in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
  (1,121)   (4,628)  4,930 
(Decrease) increase in income and
other taxes payable
  (653)   (909)  741 
    
Net (increase) decrease in operating
working capital
 $(2,301)   $(1,673) $685 
    
Net cash provided by operating
activities includes the following
cash payments for interest and
income taxes:
             
Interest paid on debt
(net of capitalized interest)
 $    $  $203 
    
Income taxes $7,537    $19,130  $12,340 
    
Net sales of marketable securities
consisted of the following
gross amounts:
             
Marketable securities sold $157    $3,719  $2,160 
Marketable securities purchased  (30)   (3,236)  (1,975)
    
Net sales of marketable securities $127    $483  $185 
    
In accordance with accounting standards for cash-flow classifications for stock options (ASC 718), the “Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital” includes reductions of $25, $106 and $96 for excess income tax benefits associated with stock options exercised during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts are offset by an equal amount in “Net sales (purchases) of treasury shares.”
     The “Net sales (purchases) of treasury shares” represents the cost of common shares purchased less the cost of shares issued for share-based compensation plans. Purchases totaled $6, $8,011 and $7,036 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Purchases in 2008 and 2007 included shares purchased under the company’s common stock repurchase programs.
     In 2009, “Net sales (purchases) of other short-term investments” consisted of $123 in restricted cash associated with capital-investment projects at the company’s Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery and the Angola liquefied-natural-gas project that was invested in short-term securities and reclassified from “Cash and cash equivalents” to “Deferred charges and other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The company issued $350 and $650, in 2009 and 2007 respectively, of tax exempt Mississippi Gulf Opportunity Zone Bonds as a source of funds for Pascagoula Refinery projects.
     The Consolidated Statement of
Cash Flows - Continued

for 2009 excludes changes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet that did not affect cash. In 2008, “Net sales (purchases) of treasury shares” excludes $680 of treasury shares acquired in exchange for a U.S. upstream property and $280 in cash. The carrying value of this property in “Properties, plant and equipment” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet was not significant. In 2008, a $2,450 increase in “Accrued liabilities” and a corresponding increase to “Properties, plant and equipment, at cost” were considered non-cash transactions and excluded from “Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital” and “Capital expenditures.” In 2009, the payments related to these “Accrued liabilities” were excluded from “Net (increase) decrease in operating working capital” and were reported as “Capital expenditures.” The amount is related to upstream operating agreements outside the United States. “Capital expenditures” in 2008 excludes a $1,400 increase in “Properties, plant and equipment” related to the acquisition of an additional interest in an equity affiliate that required a change to the consolidated method of accounting for the investment during 2008. This addition was offset primarily by reductions in “Investments and advances” and working capital and an increase in “Non-current deferred income tax” liabilities. Refer also to Note 23, on page FS-60, for a discussion of revisions to the company’s AROs that also did not involve cash receipts or payments for the three years ending December 31, 2009.
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Additions to properties, plant
and equipment1
 16,107    $ 18,495  16,127 
Additions to investments  942    1,051   881 
Current-year dry-hole expenditures  468    320   418 
Payments for other liabilities
and assets, net2
  2,326    (200)  (748)
    
Capital expenditures  19,843    19,666   16,678 
Expensed exploration expenditures  790    794   816 
Assets acquired through capital
lease obligations and other
financing obligations
  19    9   196 
    
Capital and exploratory expenditures,
excluding equity affiliates
  20,652    20,469   17,690 
Company’s share of expenditures
by equity affiliates
  1,585    2,306   2,336 
    
Capital and exploratory expenditures,
including equity affiliates
 22,237    $ 22,775  20,026 
    
1 Excludes noncash additions of $985 in 2009, $5,153 in 2008 and $3,560 in 2007.
 
2 2009 includes payments of $2,450 for accruals recorded in 2008.

In accordance with the cash-flow classification requirements of FAS 123R,Share-Based Payment, the “Net decrease in operating working capital” includes reductions of $106, $96 and $94 for excess income tax benefits associated with stock options exercised during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These amounts are offset by “Net purchases of treasury shares.”
     In 2008, “Net purchases of other short-term investments” consist of $367 in restricted cash associated with capital-investment projects at the company’s Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery and the Angola liquefied natural gas project that was invested in short-term marketable securities and reclassified from “Cash and cash equivalents” to “Deferred charges and other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In 2007, the company issued a $650 tax exempt Mississippi Gulf Opportunity Zone Bond as a source of funds for the Pascagoula Refinery project.
     The “Net purchases of treasury shares” represents the cost of common shares less the cost of shares issued for share-based compensation plans. Purchases totaled $8,011, $7,036 and $5,033 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
     The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2008 excludes changes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet that did not affect cash. “Net purchases of treasury shares” excludes $680 of treasury shares acquired in exchange for a U.S. upstream property and $280 in cash. The carrying value of this property in “Properties, plant and equipment” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet was not significant. The “Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities” excludes a $2,450 increase in “Accrued liabilities” that was offset to “Properties, plant and equipment” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This amount related to accruals associated with upstream operating agreements outside the United States. “Capital expenditures” excludes a $1,400 increase in “Properties, plant and equipment” (PPE) related to the acquisition of an additional interest in an equity affiliate that required a change to the consolidated method of accounting for the investment during 2008. This addition to PPE was offset primarily by reductions in “Investments and advances” and working capital and an increase in “Noncurrent deferred income tax” liabilities. Refer also to Note 24 beginning on page FS-58 for a discussion of revisions to the company’s AROs that also did not involve cash receipts or payments for the three years ending December 31, 2008.
     The major components of “Capital expenditures” and the reconciliation of this amount to the reported capital and exploratory expenditures, including equity affiliates, are presented in the following table:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Additions to properties, plant and equipment* $18,495   $16,127  $12,800 
Additions to investments  1,051    881   880 
Current-year dry hole expenditures  320    418   400 
Payments for other liabilities and assets, net  (200)   (748)  (267)
     
Capital expenditures  19,666    16,678   13,813 
Expensed exploration expenditures  794    816   844 
Assets acquired through capital lease obligations and other financing obligations  9    196   35 
     
Capital and exploratory expenditures, excluding equity affiliates  20,469    17,690   14,692 
Equity in affiliates’ expenditures  2,306    2,336   1,919 
     
Capital and exploratory expenditures, including equity affiliates $22,775   $20,026  $16,611 
     
* Net of noncash additions of $5,153 in 2008, $3,560 in 2007 and $440 in 2006.

Note 3

Stockholders’ Equity
Retained earnings at December 31, 2008 and 2007, included approximately $7,951 and $7,284, respectively, for the company’s share of undistributed earnings of equity affiliates.
     At December 31, 2008, about 109 million shares of Chevron’s common stock remained available for issuance from the 160 million shares that were reserved for issuance under the Chevron Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). In addition, approximately 409,000 shares remain available for issuance from the 800,000 shares of the company’s common stock that were reserved for awards under the Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan (Non-Employee Directors’ Plan).

Note 4

Summarized Financial Data – Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (CUSA) is a major subsidiary of Chevron Corporation. CUSA and its subsidiaries manage and operate most of Chevron’s U.S. businesses. Assets include those related to the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids and those associated with the refining, marketing, supply and distribution of products derived from petroleum, excluding most of the regulated pipeline operations of Chevron. CUSA also holds the company’s investment in the Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC joint venture, which is accounted for using the equity method.



FS-35


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

 

Note 45
Summarized Financial Data – Chevron U.S.A. Inc. - Continued
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (CUSA) is a major subsidiary of Chevron Corporation. CUSA and its subsidiaries manage and operate most of Chevron’s U.S. businesses. Assets include those related to the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids and those associated with the refining, marketing, supply and distribution of products derived from petroleum, excluding most of the regulated pipeline operations of Chevron. CUSA also holds the company’s investment in the Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC joint venture, which is accounted for using the equity method.
     During 2008, Chevron implemented legal reorganizations in which certain Chevron subsidiaries transferred assets to or under CUSA. The summarized financial information for CUSA and its consolidated subsidiaries presented in the table below gives retroactive effect to the reorganizations as if they had occurred on January 1, 2007. However, the financial information in the following table may not reflect the financial position and operating results in the future or the historical results in the periods presented if the reorganization actually had occurred on that date. The summarized financial information for CUSA and its consolidated subsidiaries is as follows:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Sales and other operating revenues $121,553   $195,593  $153,574 
Total costs and other deductions  120,053    185,788   147,509 
Net income attributable to CUSA  1,141    7,318   5,191 
    
         
  At December 31 
  2009  2008 
 
Current assets 23,286  32,760 
Other assets  32,827   31,806 
Current liabilities  16,098   14,322 
Other liabilities  14,625   14,049 
   
Total CUSA net equity  25,390   36,195 
 
 
Memo: Total debt  $ 6,999   $ 6,813 
     The amount for the years ended December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, for “Net income attributable to CUSA” and the balances at December 31, 2008, for “Other liabilities” and “Total CUSA net equity” have been adjusted by immaterial amounts associated with the allocation of income-tax liabilities among Chevron Corporation subsidiaries.
Note 6
Summarized Financial Data – Chevron Transport Corporation Ltd.
Chevron Transport Corporation Ltd. (CTC), incorporated in Bermuda, is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of
Chevron Corporation. CTC is the principal operator of Chevron’s international tanker fleet and is engaged in the marine transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products. Most of CTC’s shipping revenue is derived from providing transportation services to other Chevron companies. Chevron Corporation has fully and unconditionally guaranteed this subsidiary’s obligations in connection with certain debt securities issued by a third party. Summarized financial information for CTC and its consolidated subsidiaries is as follows:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Sales and other operating revenues $683   $1,022  $667 
Total costs and other deductions  810    947   713 
Net income attributable to CTC  (124)   120   (39)
    
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
    
Current assets $377   $482 
Other assets  173    172 
Current liabilities  115    98 
Other liabilities  90    88 
    
Total CTC net equity  345    468 
    
     There were no restrictions on CTC’s ability to pay dividends or make loans or advances at December 31, 2009.
Note 7
Summarized Financial Data – Tengizchevroil LLP
Chevron has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Tengizchevroil LLP (TCO). Refer to Note 12, on page FS-43, for a discussion of TCO operations.
     Summarized financial information for 100 percent of TCO is presented in the following table:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Sales and other operating revenues $12,013   $14,329  $8,919 
Costs and other deductions  6,044    5,621   3,387 
Net income attributable to TCO  4,178    6,134   3,952 
    
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
    
Current assets $3,190   $2,740 
    
Other assets  12,022    12,240 
Current liabilities  2,426    1,867 
Other liabilities  4,484    4,759 
    
Total TCO net equity  8,302    8,354 
    

     During 2008, Chevron implemented legal reorganizations in which certain Chevron subsidiaries transferred assets to or under CUSA. The summarized financial information for CUSA and its consolidated subsidiaries presented in the table below gives retroactive effect to the reorganizations as if they had occurred on January 1, 2006. However, the financial information in the following table may not reflect the financial position and operating results in the periods presented if the reorganization actually had occurred on that date.
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Sales and other operating revenues $ 195,593   $ 153,574  $ 145,774 
Total costs and other deductions  185,788    147,510   137,765 
Net income  7,237    5,203   5,668 
     
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
Current assets $ 32,760   $ 32,801 
Other assets  31,806    27,400 
Current liabilities  14,322    20,050 
Other liabilities  14,805    11,447 
     
Net equity  35,439    28,704 
     
Memo: Total debt $6,813   $4,433 

Note 5

Summarized Financial Data – Chevron Transport Corporation Ltd.
Chevron Transport Corporation Ltd. (CTC), incorporated in Bermuda, is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation. CTC is the principal operator of Chevron’s international tanker fleet and is engaged in the marine transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products. Most of CTC’s shipping revenue is derived from providing transportation services to other Chevron companies. Chevron Corporation has fully and unconditionally guaranteed this subsidiary’s obligations in connection with certain debt securities issued by a third party. Summarized financial information for CTC and its consolidated subsidiaries is presented in the following table:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Sales and other operating revenues $1,022   $667  $692 
Total costs and other deductions  947    713   602 
Net income  120    (39)  119 
     
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
Current assets $482   $335 
Other assets  172    337 
Current liabilities  98    107 
Other liabilities  88    188 
     
Net equity  468    377 
     

     There were no restrictions on CTC’s ability to pay dividends or make loans or advances at December 31, 2008.

Note 6

Summarized Financial Data – Tengizchevroil LLP.
Chevron has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Tengizchevroil LLP (TCO). Refer to Note 12 on page FS-41 for a discussion of TCO operations.
     Summarized financial information for 100 percent of TCO is presented in the table below:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Sales and other operating revenues $ 14,329   $ 8,919  $ 7,654 
Costs and other deductions  5,621    3,387   2,967 
Net income  6,134    3,952   3,315 
     
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007��
     
Current assets $2,740   $2,784 
Other assets   12,240     11,446 
Current liabilities  1,867    1,534 
Other liabilities  4,759    4,927 
     
Net equity  8,354    7,769 
     

Note 7

Financial and Derivative Instruments
Derivative Commodity Instruments Chevron is exposed to market risks related to price volatility of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and refinery feedstocks.
     The company uses derivative commodity instruments to manage these exposures on a portion of its activity, including firm commitments and anticipated transactions for the purchase, sale and storage of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, natural gas liquids and feedstock for company refineries. From time to time, the company also uses derivative commodity instruments for limited trading purposes.
     The company uses International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreements to govern derivative contracts with certain counterparties to mitigate credit risk. Depending on the nature of the derivative transactions, bilateral collateral arrangements may also be required. When the company is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the net mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty and is a reasonable measure of the company’s credit risk exposure. The company also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with which it conducts significant transactions to mitigate credit risk.
     The fair values of the outstanding contracts are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Accounts and notes receivable,” “Accounts payable,” “Long-term receivables – net” and “Deferred credits and other noncurrent obligations.” Gains and losses on the company’s risk management activities



FS-36




 
 

Note 7Financial8
Lease Commitments
Certain noncancelable leases are classified as capital leases, and Derivative Instruments - Continued

the leased assets are included as part of “Properties, plant and equipment, at cost” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Such leasing arrangements involve tanker charters, crude-oil production and processing equipment, service stations, office buildings, and other facilities. Other leases are classified as operating leases and are not capitalized. The payments on such leases are recorded as expense. Details of the capitalized leased assets are as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
    
Upstream $510   $491 
Downstream  332    399 
Chemicals and all other  171    171 
    
Total  1,013    1,061 
Less: Accumulated amortization  585    522 
    
Net capitalized leased assets $428   $539 
    
     Rental expenses incurred for operating leases during 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Minimum rentals $2,179   $2,984  $2,419 
Contingent rentals  7    6   6 
    
Total  2,186    2,990   2,425 
Less: Sublease rental income  41    41   30 
    
Net rental expense $2,145   $2,949  $2,395 
    
     Contingent rentals are based on factors other than the passage of time, principally sales volumes at leased service stations. Certain leases include escalation clauses for adjusting rentals to reflect changes in price indices, renewal options ranging up to 25 years, and options to purchase the leased property during or at the end of the initial or renewal lease period for the fair market value or other specified amount at that time.
     At December 31, 2009, the estimated future minimum lease payments (net of noncancelable sublease rentals) under operating and capital leases, which at inception had a non-cancelable term of more than one year, were as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  Operating   Capital 
  Leases   Leases 
    
Year: 2010  568    90 
2011  438    81 
2012  406    87 
2013  372    60 
2014  347    44 
Thereafter  1,233    137 
    
Total $3,364   $499 
    
Less: Amounts representing interest
and executory costs
       (104)
    
Net present values       395 
Less: Capital lease obligations
included in short-term debt
       (94)
    
Long-term capital lease obligations      $301 
    
Note 9
Fair Value Measurements
Accounting standards for fair-value measurement (ASC 820) establish a framework for measuring fair value and stipulate disclosures about fair-value measurements. The standards apply to recurring and nonrecurring financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that require or permit fair-value measurements. ASC 820 became effective for Chevron on January 1, 2008, for all financial assets and liabilities and recurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities. On January 1, 2009, the standard became effective for nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities. Among the required disclosures is the fair-value hierarchy of inputs the company uses to value an asset or a liability. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are described as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the company, Level 1 inputs include exchange-traded futures contracts for which the parties are willing to transact at the exchange-quoted price and marketable securities that are actively traded.
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly. For the company, Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, prices obtained through third-party broker quotes, and prices that can be corroborated with other observable inputs for substantially the complete term of a contract.

are reported as either “Sales and other operating revenues” or “Purchased crude oil and products,” whereas trading gains and losses are reported as “Other income.”

Foreign Currency  The company enters into forward exchange contracts, generally with terms of 180 days or less, to manage some of its foreign currency exposures. These exposures include revenue and anticipated purchase transactions, including foreign currency capital expenditures and lease commitments, forecasted to occur within 180 days. The forward exchange contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income.

     The fair values of the outstanding contracts are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Accounts and notes receivable” or “Accounts payable,” with gains and losses reported as “Other income.”

Interest Rates  The company enters into interest rate swaps from time to time as part of its overall strategy to manage the interest rate risk on its debt. Under the terms of the swaps, net cash settlements are based on the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to agreed notional principal amounts. Interest rate swaps related to a portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt are accounted for as fair value hedges.

     Fair values of the interest rate swaps are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Accounts and notes receivable” or “Accounts payable.” Interest rate swaps related to floating-rate debt are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. At year-end 2008, the company had no interest-rate swaps on floating-rate debt.

Fair Value  Fair values are derived from quoted market prices, other independent third-party quotes or, if not available, the present value of the expected cash flows. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been received or paid if the instruments were settled at year-end.

     Long-term debt of $1,221 and $2,132 had estimated fair values of $1,414 and $2,354 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
     The company holds cash equivalents and marketable securities in U.S. and non-U.S. portfolios. The instruments held are primarily time deposits, money market funds and fixed rate bonds. Cash equivalents and marketable securities had carrying/fair values of $7,271 and $5,427 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Of these balances, $7,058 and $4,695 at the respective year-ends were classified as cash equivalents that had average maturities under 90 days. The remainder, classified as marketable securities, had average maturities of approximately one year. At December 31, 2008,

restricted cash with a carrying/fair value of $367 that is related to capital-investment projects at the company’s Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery and Angola liquefied natural gas project was reclassified from “Cash and cash equivalents” to “Deferred charges and other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This restricted cash was invested in short-term marketable securities.
     Fair values of other financial and derivative instruments at the end of 2008 and 2007 were not material.

Concentrations of Credit Risk   The company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of its cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivative financial instruments and trade receivables. The company’s short-term investments are placed with a wide array of financial institutions with high credit ratings. This diversified investment policy limits the company’s exposure both to credit risk and to concentrations of credit risk. Similar standards of diversity and creditworthiness are applied to the company’s counterparties in derivative instruments.

     The trade receivable balances, reflecting the company’s diversified sources of revenue, are dispersed among the company’s broad customer base worldwide. As a consequence, the company believes concentrations of credit risk are limited. The company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers. When the financial strength of a customer is not considered sufficient, requiring Letters of Credit is a principal method used to support sales to customers.
Note 8
Fair Value Measurements
The company implemented FASB Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(FAS 157), as of January 1, 2008. FAS 157 was amended in February 2008 by FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Its Related Interpretive Accounting Pronouncements That Address Leasing Transactions,and by FSP FAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,which delayed the company’s application of FAS 157 for nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities until January 1, 2009. FAS 157 was further amended in October 2008 by FSP FAS 157-3,Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active,which clarifies the application of FAS 157 to assets participating in inactive markets.
     Implementation of FAS 157 did not have a material effect on the company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position and had no effect on the company’s existing fair-value measurement practices. However, FAS 157 requires disclosure of a fair-value hierarchy of inputs the



FS-37


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 9Fair Value Measurements - Continued
Level 3: Unobservable inputs. The company does not use Level 3 inputs for any of its recurring fair-value measurements. Level 3 inputs may be required for the determination of fair value associated with certain nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities. In 2009, the company used Level 3 inputs to determine the fair value of certain nonrecurring nonfinancial assets.
     The fair-value hierarchy for recurring assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, is as follows:
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
                                   
       Prices in Active               Prices in Active       
       Markets for  Other           Markets for  Other    
       Identical  Observable  Unobservable       Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
  At December 31   Assets/Liabilities  Inputs  Inputs  At December 31   Assets/Liabilities  Inputs  Inputs 
  2009   (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  2008   (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
       
Marketable Securities $106   $106  $  $  $213   $213  $  $ 
Derivatives  127    14   113      805    529   276    
       
Total Recurring Assets
                                  
at Fair Value
 $233   $120  $113  $  $1,018   $742  $276  $ 
       
Derivatives $101   $20  $81  $  $516   $98  $418  $ 
       
Total Recurring Liabilities
                                  
at Fair Value
 $101   $20  $81  $  $516   $98  $418  $ 
       

Marketable SecuritiesThe company calculates fair value for its marketable securities based on quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been received if the instruments were sold at December 31, 2009. Marketable securities had average maturities of less than one year.
DerivativesThe company records its derivative
instruments – other than any commodity derivative contracts that are designated as normal purchase and normal sale – on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value, with virtually all the offsetting amount to the Consolidated Statement of Income. For derivatives with identical or similar provisions as contracts that are publicly traded on a regular basis, the company uses the market values of the publicly traded instruments as an input for fair-value calculations.
     The company’s derivative instruments principally include crude-oil, natural-gas and refined-product futures, swaps, options and forward contracts. Derivatives classified as Level 1 include futures, swaps and options contracts traded in active markets such as the New York Mercantile Exchange.
     Derivatives classified as Level 2 include swaps, options, and forward contracts principally with financial institutions and other oil and gas companies, the fair values for which are obtained from third-party broker quotes, industry pric-
ing services and exchanges. The company obtains multiple sources of pricing information for the Level 2 instruments. Since this pricing information is generated from observable market data, it has historically been very consistent. The company does not materially adjust this information. The company incorporates internal review, evaluation and assessment procedures, including a comparison of Level 2 fair values derived from the company’s internally developed forward curves (on a sample basis) with the pricing information to document reasonable, logical and supportable fair-value determinations and proper level of classification.
Impairments of “Properties, plant and equipment”During 2009 and in accordance with the accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets (ASC 360), long-lived assets “held and used” with a carrying amount of $949 were written down to a fair value of $490, resulting in a before-tax loss of $459. The fair values were determined from internal cash-flow models, using discount rates consistent with those used by the company to evaluate cash flows of other assets of a similar nature. Long-lived assets “held for sale” with a carrying amount of $160 were written down to a fair value of $68, resulting in a before-tax loss of $92. The fair values were determined based on bids received from prospective buyers.


FS-38


Note 89Fair Value Measurements - Continued
     The fair-value hierarchy for nonrecurring assets and liabilities measured at fair value during 2009 is presented in the following table.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
                     
      Prices in Active  Other      Loss (Before Tax) 
  Year Ended  Markets for  Observable  Unobservable  Year Ended 
  December 31  Identical Assets  Inputs  Inputs  December 31 
  2009  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  2009 
 
Properties, plant and equipment, net (held and used) $490  $  $  $490  $459 
Properties, plant and equipment, net (held for sale)  68      68      92 
 
Total Nonrecurring Assets at Fair Value
 $558  $  $68  $490  $551 
 

Assets and Liabilities Not Required to Be Measured at Fair ValueThe company holds cash equivalents in U.S. and non-U.S. portfolios. The instruments held are primarily time deposits and money market funds. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been received or paid if the instruments were settled atyear-end. Cash equivalents had carrying/fair values of $6,396 and $7,058 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and average maturities under 90 days. The balance at December 31, 2009, includes $123 of investments for restricted funds related to an international upstream development project and Pascagoula Refinery projects, which are included in “Deferred charges and other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Long-term debt of $5,705 and $1,221 had estimated fair values of $6,229 and $1,414 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
     Fair values of other financial instruments at the end of 2009 and 2008 were not material.
Note 10
Financial and Derivative Instruments
Derivative Commodity InstrumentsChevron is exposed to market risks related to price volatility of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and refinery feedstocks.
     The company uses derivative commodity instruments to manage these exposures on a portion of its activity, including firm commitments and anticipated transactions for the pur-
chase, sale and storage of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, natural gas liquids and feedstock for company refineries. From time to time, the company also uses derivative commodity instruments for limited trading purposes.
     The company’s derivative commodity instruments principally include crude-oil, natural-gas and refined-product futures, swaps, options and forward contracts. None of the company’s derivative instruments is designated as a hedging instrument, although certain of the company’s affiliates make such designation. The company’s derivatives are not material to the company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. The company believes it has no material market or credit risks to its operations, financial position or liquidity as a result of its commodities and other derivatives activities.
     The company uses International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreements to govern derivative contracts with certain counterparties to mitigate credit risk. Depending on the nature of the derivative transactions, bilateral collateral arrangements may also be required. When the company is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the net mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty and is a reasonable measure of the company’s credit risk exposure. The company also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with which it conducts significant transactions to mitigate credit risk.

company uses to value an asset or a liability. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy

     Derivative instruments measured at fair value at December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, and their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Income are described as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the company, Level 1 inputs include exchange-traded futures contracts for which the parties are willing to transact at the exchange-quoted price and marketable securities that are actively traded.
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly. For the company, Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, prices obtained through third-party broker quotes, and prices that can be corroborated with other observable inputs for substantially the complete term of a contract.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs. The company does not use Level 3 inputs for any of its recurring fair-value measurements. Beginning January 1, 2009, Level 3 inputs may be required for the determination of fair value associated with certain nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities.

     The fair-value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2008, is as follows:

Assets and Liabilities Measured at
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

                 
      Prices in Active       
      Markets for  Other    
      Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
  At December 31  Assets/Liabilities  Inputs  Inputs 
  2008  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
 
Marketable Securities $213  $213  $  $ 
Derivatives  805   529   276    
 
Total Assets at Fair Value
 $1,018  $742  $276  $ 
 
Derivatives $516  $98  $418  $ 
 
Total Liabilities at Fair Value
 $516  $98  $418  $ 
 

Marketable securities  The company calculates fair value for its marketable securities based on quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities.

Derivatives  The company records its derivative instruments – other than any commodity derivative contracts that are designated as normal purchase and normal sale – on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value, with virtually all the offsetting amount to income. For derivatives with identical or similar provisions as contracts that are publicly traded on a regular basis, the company uses the market values of the publicly traded instruments as an input for fair-value calculations.
     The company’s derivative instruments principally include crude oil, natural gas and refined-product futures, swaps, options and forward contracts, as well as interest-rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts. Derivatives
Consolidated Balance Sheet: Fair Value of Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
                         
      Asset Derivatives – Fair Value  Liability Derivatives – Fair Value 
Type of Balance Sheet  At December 31  At December 31  Balance Sheet  At December 31  At December 31 
Derivative Contract Classification  2009  2008  Classification  2009  2008 
 
Foreign Exchange Accounts and notes
receivable, net
 $  $11  Accrued liabilities $  $89 
Commodity Accounts and notes
receivable, net
  99   764  Accounts payable  73   344 
Commodity Long-term
receivables, net
  28   30  Deferred credits and
other noncurrent obligations
  28   83 
 
      $127  $805      $101  $516 
 

FS-39

classified as Level 1 include futures, swaps and options contracts traded in active markets such as the NYMEX (New York Mercantile Exchange).
     Derivatives classified as Level 2 include swaps (including interest rate), options, and forward (including foreign currency) contracts principally with financial institutions and other oil and gas companies, the fair values for which are obtained from third-party broker quotes, industry pricing services and exchanges. The company obtains multiple sources of pricing information for the Level 2 instruments. Since this pricing information is generated from observable market data, it has historically been very consistent. The company does not materially adjust this information. The company incorporates internal review, evaluation and assessment procedures, including a comparison of Level 2 fair values derived from the company’s internally developed forward curves (on a sample basis) with the pricing information to document reasonable, logical and supportable fair-value determinations and proper level of classification.
Note 9
Operating Segments and Geographic Data
Although each subsidiary of Chevron is responsible for its own affairs, Chevron Corporation manages its investments in these subsidiaries and their affiliates. For this purpose, the investments are grouped as follows: upstream – exploration and production; downstream – refining, marketing and transportation; chemicals; and all other. The first three of these groupings represent the company’s “reportable segments” and “operating segments” as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 131,Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information(FAS 131).
     The segments are separately managed for investment purposes under a structure that includes “segment managers” who report to the company’s “chief operating decision maker” (CODM) (terms as defined in FAS 131). The CODM is the company’s Executive Committee, a committee of senior officers that includes the Chief Executive Officer and that, in turn, reports to the Board of Directors of Chevron Corporation.
     The operating segments represent components of the company as described in FAS 131 terms that engage in activities (a) from which revenues are earned and expenses are incurred; (b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the CODM, which makes decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance; and (c) for which discrete financial information is available.
     Segment managers for the reportable segments are accountable directly to and maintain regular contact with the company’s CODM to discuss the segment’s operating activities and financial performance. The CODM approves annual capital and exploratory budgets at the reportable segment level, as well as reviews capital and exploratory funding for major


FS-38





Note 9Operating Segments and Geographic Data - Continued

projects and approves major changes to the annual capital and exploratory budgets. However, business-unit managers within the operating segments are directly responsible for decisions relating to project implementation and all other matters connected with daily operations. Company officers who are members of the Executive Committee also have individual management responsibilities and participate in other committees for purposes other than acting as the CODM.

     “All Other” activities include the company’s interest in Dynegy (through May 2007, when Chevron sold its interest), mining operations, power generation businesses, worldwide cash management and debt financing activities, corporate administrative functions, insurance operations, real estate activities, alternative fuels, and technology companies.
     The company’s primary country of operation is the United States of America, its country of domicile. Other components of the company’s operations are reported as “International” (outside the United States).

Segment Earnings  The company evaluates the performance of its operating segments on an after-tax basis, without considering the effects of debt financing interest expense or investment interest income, both of which are managed by the company on a worldwide basis. Corporate administrative costs and assets are not allocated to the operating segments. However, operating segments are billed for the direct use of corporate services. Nonbillable costs remain at the corporate level in “All Other.” After-tax segment income by major operating area is presented in the following table:

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Income by Major Operating Area
             
Upstream
             
United States $7,126   $4,532  $4,270 
International  14,584    10,284   8,872 
     
Total Upstream
  21,710    14,816   13,142 
     
Downstream
             
United States  1,369    966   1,938 
International  2,060    2,536   2,035 
     
Total Downstream
  3,429    3,502   3,973 
     
Chemicals
             
United States  22    253   430 
International  160    143   109 
     
Total Chemicals
  182    396   539 
     
Total Segment Income
  25,321    18,714   17,654 
All Other
             
Interest expense      (107)  (312)
Interest income  192    385   380 
Other  (1,582)   (304)  (584)
     
Net Income
 $ 23,931   $ 18,688  $ 17,138 
     

Segment Assets  Segment assets do not include intercompany investments or intercompany receivables. Segment assets at year-end 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
Upstream
         
United States $26,071   $23,535 
International  72,530    61,049 
Goodwill  4,619    4,637 
     
Total Upstream
  103,220    89,221 
     
Downstream
         
United States  15,869    16,790 
International  23,572    26,075 
     
Total Downstream
  39,441    42,865 
     
Chemicals
         
United States  2,535    2,484 
International  1,086    870 
     
Total Chemicals
  3,621    3,354 
     
Total Segment Assets
  146,282    135,440 
     
All Other*
         
United States  8,984    6,847 
International  5,899    6,499 
     
Total All Other
  14,883    13,346 
     
Total Assets – United States
  53,459    49,656 
Total Assets – International
  103,087    94,493 
Goodwill
  4,619    4,637 
     
Total Assets
 $ 161,165   $ 148,786 
     
*“All Other” assets consist primarily of worldwide cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, real estate, information systems, mining operations, power generation businesses, technology companies, and assets of the corporate administrative functions.

Segment Sales and Other Operating Revenues   Operating segment sales and other operating revenues, including internal transfers, for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006 are presented in the table on the following page. Products are transferred between operating segments at internal product values that approximate market prices.

     Revenues for the upstream segment are derived primarily from the production and sale of crude oil and natural gas, as well as the sale of third-party production of natural gas. Revenues for the downstream segment are derived from the refining and marketing of petroleum products, such as gasoline, jet fuel, gas oils, kerosene, lubricants, residual fuel oils and other products derived from crude oil. This segment also generates revenues from the transportation and trading of crude oil and refined products. Revenues for the chemicals segment are derived primarily from the manufacture and sale of additives for lubricants and fuel. “All Other” activities include revenues from mining operations of coal and other minerals, power generation businesses, insurance operations, real estate activities, and technology companies.



FS-39


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 10 Financial and Derivative Instruments - Continued
 

Consolidated Statement of Income:
The Effect of Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
             
          Gain/(Loss) 
Type of Derivative Statement of  Year Ended December 31 
Contract Income Classification  2009  2008 
 
 
Foreign Exchange Other income $26  $(314)
Commodity Sales and other        
     operating revenues  (94)  706 
Commodity Purchased crude oil        
     and products  (353)  424 
Commodity Other income     (3)
 
      $(421) $813 
 
Foreign CurrencyThe company may enter into currency derivative contracts to manage some of its foreign currency exposures. These exposures include revenue and anticipated purchase transactions, including foreign currency capital expenditures and lease commitments. The currency derivative contracts, if any, are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. There were no open currency derivative contracts at December 31, 2009.
Interest RatesThe company may enter into interest rate swaps from time to time as part of its overall strategy to manage the interest rate risk on its debt. Historically, under the terms of the swaps, net cash settlements were based on the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to agreed notional principal amounts. Interest rate swaps related to a portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt, if any, may be accounted for as fair value hedges. Interest rate swaps related to floating-rate debt, if any, are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. At year-end 2009, the company had no interest rate swaps. The company’s only interest rate swaps on fixed-rate debt matured in January 2009.
Concentrations of Credit RiskThe company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of its cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivative financial instruments and trade receivables. The company’s short-term investments are placed with a wide array of financial institutions with high credit ratings. This diversified investment policy limits the company’s exposure both to credit risk and to concentrations of credit risk. Similar standards of diversity and creditworthiness are applied to the company’s counterparties in derivative instruments.
     The trade receivable balances, reflecting the company’s diversified sources of revenue, are dispersed among the company’s broad customer base worldwide. As a result, the company believes concentrations of credit risk are limited. The company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers. When the financial strength of a customer is not considered sufficient, requiring Letters of Credit is a principal method used to support sales to customers.
Note 911
Operating Segments and Geographic Data - Continued

     Other than the United States, no single country accounted for 10 percent or more of the company’s total sales and other operating revenues in 2008.

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Upstream
             
United States $23,503   $18,736  $18,061 
Intersegment  15,142    11,625   10,069 
     
Total United States  38,645    30,361   28,130 
     
International  19,469    15,213   14,560 
Intersegment  24,204    19,647   17,139 
     
Total International  43,673    34,860   31,699 
     
Total Upstream
  82,318    65,221   59,829 
     
Downstream
             
United States  87,515    70,535   69,367 
Excise and similar taxes  4,746    4,990   4,829 
Intersegment  447    491   533 
     
Total United States  92,708    76,016   74,729 
     
International  122,064    97,178   91,325 
Excise and similar taxes  5,044    5,042   4,657 
Intersegment  122    38   37 
     
Total International  127,230    102,258   96,019 
     
Total Downstream
  219,938    178,274   170,748 
     
Chemicals
             
United States  305    351   372 
Excise and similar taxes  2    2   2 
Intersegment  266    235   243 
     
Total United States  573    588   617 
     
International  1,388    1,143   959 
Excise and similar taxes  55    86   63 
Intersegment  154    142   160 
     
Total International  1,597    1,371   1,182 
     
Total Chemicals
  2,170    1,959   1,799 
     
All Other
             
United States  815    757   653 
Intersegment  917    760   584 
     
Total United States  1,732    1,517   1,237 
     
International  52    58   44 
Intersegment  33    31   23 
     
Total International  85    89   67 
     
Total All Other
  1,817    1,606   1,304 
     
Segment Sales and Other Operating Revenues
             
United States  133,658    108,482   104,713 
International  172,585    138,578   128,967 
     
Total Segment Sales and Other Operating Revenues
  306,243    247,060   233,680 
Elimination of intersegment sales  (41,285)   (32,969)  (28,788)
     
Total Sales and Other Operating Revenues*
 $264,958   $214,091  $204,892 
     
*Includes buy/sell contracts
Although each subsidiary of $6,725Chevron is responsible for its own affairs, Chevron Corporation manages its investments in 2006. Substantiallythese subsidiaries and their affiliates. For this purpose, the investments are grouped as follows: upstream – exploration and production; downstream – refining, marketing and transportation; chemicals; and all other. The first three of these groupings represent the company’s “reportable segments” and “operating segments” as defined in accounting standards for segment reporting (ASC 280).
     The segments are separately managed for investment purposes under a structure that includes “segment managers” who report to the company’s “chief operating decision maker” (CODM) (terms as defined in ASC 280). The CODM is the company’s Executive Committee, a committee of senior officers that includes the Chief Executive Officer and that, in turn, reports to the Board of Directors of Chevron Corporation.
     The operating segments represent components of the amounts relatecompany, as described in accounting standards for segment reporting (ASC 280), that engage in activities (a) from which revenues are earned and expenses are incurred; (b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the CODM, which makes decisions about resources to be allocated to the downstream segment. Refersegments and to Note 14, on page FS-43,assess their performance; and (c) for a discussion ofwhich discrete financial information is available.
     Segment managers for the reportable segments are directly accountable to and maintain regular contact with the company’s accountingCODM to discuss the segment’s operating activities and financial performance. The CODM approves annual capital and exploratory budgets at the reportable segment level, as well as reviews capital and exploratory funding for buy/sell contracts.

major projects and approves major changes to the annual capital and exploratory budgets. However, business-unit managers within the operating segments are directly responsible for decisions relating to project implementation and all other matters connected with daily operations. Company officers who are

Segment Income Taxes   Segment income tax expense for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Upstream
             
United States $3,693   $2,541  $2,668 
International  15,132    11,307   10,987 
     
Total Upstream
  18,825    13,848   13,655 
     
Downstream
             
United States  815    520   1,162 
International  813    400   586 
     
Total Downstream
  1,628    920   1,748 
     
Chemicals
             
United States  (22)   6   213 
International  47    36   30 
     
Total Chemicals
  25    42   243 
     
All Other
  (1,452)   (1,331)  (808)
     
Total Income Tax Expense
 $ 19,026   $ 13,479  $ 14,838 
     

Other Segment Information   Additional information for the segmentation of major equity affiliates is contained in Note 12, beginning on page FS-41. Information related to properties, plant and equipment by segment is contained in Note 13, on page FS-43.

Note 10
Lease Commitments
Certain noncancelable leases are classified as capital leases, and the leased assets are included as part of “Properties, plant and equipment, at cost.” Such leasing arrangements involve tanker charters, crude oil production and processing equipment, service stations, office buildings, and other facilities. Other leases are classified as operating leases and are not capitalized. The payments on such leases are recorded as expense. Details of the capitalized leased assets are as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
Upstream $491   $482 
Downstream $399   $551 
Chemical and all other  171    171 
     
Total   1,061     1,204 
Less: Accumulated amortization  522    628 
     
Net capitalized leased assets $539   $576 
     

     Rental expenses incurred for operating leases during 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Minimum rentals $ 2,984   $ 2,419  $ 2,326 
Contingent rentals  6    6   6 
     
Total  2,990    2,425   2,332 
Less: Sublease rental income  41    30   33 
     
Net rental expense $2,949   $2,395  $2,299 
     



FS-40





Note 10Lease Commitments - Continued

     Contingent rentals are based on factors other than the passage of time, principally sales volumes at leased service stations. Certain leases include escalation clauses for adjusting rentals to reflect changes in price indices, renewal options ranging up to 25 years, and options to purchase the leased property during or at the end of the initial or renewal lease period for the fair market value or other specified amount at that time.
     At December 31, 2008, the estimated future minimum lease payments (net of noncancelable sublease rentals) under operating and capital leases, which at inception had a non-cancelable term of more than one year, were as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  Operating   Capital 
  Leases   Leases 
Year: 2009 $503   $97 
2010  463    77 
2011  372    77 
2012  315    84 
2013  288    59 
Thereafter  947    154 
    
Total $2,888   $548 
    
Less: Amounts representing interest and executory costs       (110)
    
Net present values       438 
Less: Capital lease obligations included in short-term debt       (97)
    
Long-term capital lease obligations      $341 
    

Note 11
Restructuring and Reorganization Costs

In 2007, the company implemented a restructuring and reorganization program in its downstream operations. Approximately 900 employees were eligible for severance payments. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 700 employees have been terminated under the program. Most of the associated positions are located outside the United States. The program is expected to be completed by the end of 2009.
     Shown in the table below is the activity for the company’s liability related to the downstream reorganization. The associated charges against income were categorized as “Operating expenses” or “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
          
Amounts before tax 2008   2007 
Balance at January 1 $85   $ 
Accruals/adjustments  (11)   85 
Payments  (52)    
    
Balance at December 31 $22   $85 
    

Note 12
Investments and Advances

Equity in earnings, together with investments in and advances to companies accounted for using the equity method and other investments accounted for at or below cost, is shown in the table below. For certain equity affiliates, Chevron pays its share of some income taxes directly. For such affiliates, the equity in earnings does not include these taxes, which are reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income as “Income tax expense.”
                      
  Investments and Advances   Equity in Earnings 
  At December 31   Year ended December 31 
  2008  2007   2008  2007  2006 
Upstream
                     
Tengizchevroil $6,290  $6,321   $3,220  $2,135  $1,817 
Petropiar/Hamaca  1,130   1,168    317   327   319 
Petroboscan  816   762    244   185   31 
Angola LNG Limited  1,191   574    (8)  21    
Other  725   765    206   204   123 
    
Total Upstream  10,152   9,590    3,979   2,872   2,290 
    
Downstream
                     
GS Caltex Corporation  2,601   2,276    444   217   316 
Caspian Pipeline Consortium  749   951    103   102   117 
Star Petroleum Refining Company Ltd.  877   944    22   157   116 
Escravos Gas-to-Liquids     628    86   103   146 
Caltex Australia Ltd.  723   580    250   129   186 
Colonial Pipeline Company  536   546    32   39   34 
Other  1,664   1,501    268   215   212 
    
Total Downstream  7,150   7,426    1,205   962   1,127 
    
Chemicals
                     
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC  2,037   2,024    158   380   697 
Other  25   24    4   6   5 
    
Total Chemicals  2,062   2,048    162   386   702 
    
All Other
                     
Other  567   449    20   (76)  136 
    
Total equity method $19,931  $19,513   $5,366  $4,144  $4,255 
Other at or below cost  989   964              
              
Total investments and advances $20,920  $20,477              
    
Total United States $4,002  $3,889   $307  $478  $955 
Total International $16,918  $16,588   $ 5,059  $ 3,666  $ 3,300 
    
     Descriptions of major affiliates, including significant differences between the company’s carrying value of its investments and its underlying equity in the net assets of the affiliates, are as follows:
Tengizchevroil  Chevron has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Tengizchevroil (TCO), a joint venture formed in 1993 to develop the Tengiz and Korolev crude oil fields in Kazakhstan over a
40-year period. At December 31, 2008, the company’s carrying value of its investment in TCO was about $210 higher than the amount of underlying equity in TCO net assets. This difference results from Chevron acquiring a portion of its interest in TCO at a value greater than the underlying equity for that portion of TCO’s assets.



FS-41


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts



Note 12
Investments11 Operating Segments and AdvancesGeographic Data - Continued

members of the Executive Committee also have individual management responsibilities and participate in other committees for purposes other than acting as the CODM.
     “All Other” activities include mining operations, power generation businesses, worldwide cash management and debt financing activities, corporate administrative functions, insurance operations, real estate activities, alternative fuels and technology companies, and the company’s interest in Dynegy (through May 2007, when Chevron sold its interest).
     The company’s primary country of operation is the United States of America, its country of domicile. Other components of the company’s operations are reported as “International” (outside the United States).
Segment EarningsThe company evaluates the performance of its operating segments on an after-tax basis, without considering the effects of debt financing interest expense or investment interest income, both of which are managed by the company on a worldwide basis. Corporate administrative costs and assets are not allocated to the operating segments. However, operating segments are billed for the direct use of corporate services. Nonbillable costs remain at the corporate level in “All Other.” Earnings by major operating area are presented in the following table:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Segment Earnings
             
Upstream
             
United States $2,216   $7,126  $4,532 
International  8,215    14,584   10,284 
    
Total Upstream
  10,431    21,710   14,816 
    
Downstream
             
United States  (273)   1,369   966 
International  838    2,060   2,536 
    
Total Downstream
  565    3,429   3,502 
    
Chemicals
             
United States  198    22   253 
International  211    160   143 
    
Total Chemicals
  409    182   396 
    
Total Segment Earnings
  11,405    25,321   18,714 
All Other
             
Interest expense  (22)      (107)
Interest income  46    192   385 
Other  (946)   (1,582)  (304)
    
Net Income Attributable
to Chevron Corporation
 $10,483   $23,931  $18,688 
    
Segment AssetsSegment assets do not include intercompany investments or intercompany receivables. Segment assets at year-end 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
    
Upstream
         
United States $24,918   $26,071 
International  74,937    72,530 
Goodwill  4,618    4,619 
    
Total Upstream
  104,473    103,220 
    
Downstream
         
United States  18,067    15,869 
International  24,824    23,572 
    
Total Downstream
  42,891    39,441 
    
Chemicals
         
United States  2,810    2,535 
International  1,066    1,086 
    
Total Chemicals
  3,876    3,621 
    
Total Segment Assets
  151,240    146,282 
    
All Other*
         
United States  7,125    8,984 
International  6,256    5,899 
    
Total All Other
  13,381    14,883 
    
Total Assets – United States
  52,920    53,459 
Total Assets – International
  107,083    103,087 
Goodwill
  4,618    4,619 
    
Total Assets
 $164,621   $161,165 
    
*“All Other” assets consist primarily of worldwide cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, real estate, information systems, mining operations, power generation businesses, alternative fuels and technology companies, and assets of the corporate administrative functions.
Segment Sales and Other Operating RevenuesOperating segment sales and other operating revenues, including internal transfers, for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, are presented in the table on the following page. Products are transferred between operating segments at internal product values that approximate market prices.
     Revenues for the upstream segment are derived primarily from the production and sale of crude oil and natural gas, as well as the sale of third-party production of natural gas. Revenues for the downstream segment are derived from the refining and marketing of petroleum products such as gasoline, jet fuel, gas oils, lubricants, residual fuel oils and other products derived from crude oil. This segment also generates revenues from the transportation and trading of refined products, crude oil and natural gas liquids. Revenues

Petropiar  Chevron has a 30 percent interest in Petropiar, a joint stock company formed in 2008 to operate the Hamaca heavy oil production and upgrading project. The project, located in Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt, has a 25-year contract term. Prior to the formation of Petropiar, Chevron had a 30 percent interest in the Hamaca project. At December 31, 2008, the company’s carrying value of its investment in Petropiar was approximately $250 less than the amount of underlying equity in Petropiar net assets. The difference represents the excess of Chevron’s underlying equity in Petropiar’s net assets over the net book value of the assets contributed to the venture.

Petroboscan  Chevron has a 39 percent interest in Petroboscan, a joint stock company formed in 2006 to operate the Boscan Field in Venezuela until 2026. Chevron previously operated the field under an operating service agreement. At December 31, 2008, the company’s carrying value of its investment in Petroboscan was approximately $290 higher than the amount of underlying equity in Petroboscan net assets. The difference reflects the excess of the net book value of the assets contributed by Chevron over its underlying equity in Petroboscan’s net assets.

Angola LNG Ltd.  Chevron has a 36 percent interest in Angola LNG Ltd., which will process and liquefy natural gas produced in Angola for delivery to international markets.

GS Caltex Corporation  Chevron owns 50 percent of GS Caltex Corporation, a joint venture with GS Holdings. The joint venture imports, refines and markets petroleum products and petrochemicals, predominantly in South Korea.

Caspian Pipeline Consortium  Chevron has a 15 percent interest in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, which provides the critical export route for crude oil from both TCO and Karachaganak.

Star Petroleum Refining Company Ltd.  Chevron has a 64 percent equity ownership interest in Star Petroleum Refining Company Ltd. (SPRC), which owns the Star Refinery in Thailand. The Petroleum Authority of Thailand owns the remaining 36 percent of SPRC.

Escravos Gas-to-Liquids  Chevron Nigeria Limited (CNL) has a 75 percent interest in Escravos Gas-to-Liquids (EGTL) with the other 25 percent of the joint venture owned by Nigeria National Petroleum Company. Until December 1, 2008, Sasol Ltd. provided 50 percent of CNL’s funding require-

FS-41

ments for the venture as risk-based financing (returns are based on project performance). Effective December 1, 2008, Chevron acquired an additional 37 percent of the obligation from Sasol, with Sasol retaining 13 percent of the funding obligation. On that date, Chevron changed its method of accounting for its EGTL investment from equity to consolidated. This venture was formed to convert natural gas produced from Chevron’s Nigerian operations into liquid products for sale in international markets.

Caltex Australia Ltd.  Chevron has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Caltex Australia Ltd. (CAL). The remaining 50 percent of CAL is publicly owned. At December 31, 2008, the fair value of Chevron’s share of CAL common stock was approximately $670. The decline in value below the company’s carrying value of $723 million at the end of 2008 was deemed temporary.

Colonial Pipeline Company  Chevron owns an approximate 23 percent equity interest in the Colonial Pipeline Company. The Colonial Pipeline system runs from Texas to New Jersey and transports petroleum products in a 13-state market. At December 31, 2008, the company’s carrying value of its investment in Colonial Pipeline was approximately $560 higher than the amount of underlying equity in Colonial Pipeline net assets. This difference primarily relates to purchase price adjustments from the acquisition of Unocal Corporation.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC  Chevron owns 50 percent of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem), with the other half owned by ConocoPhillips Corporation.

Dynegy Inc.  In 2007, Chevron sold its 19 percent common stock investment in Dynegy Inc., for approximately $940, resulting in a gain of $680.

Other Information  “Sales and other operating revenues” on the Consolidated Statement of Income includes $15,390, $11,555 and $9,582 with affiliated companies for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. “Purchased crude oil and products” includes $6,850, $5,464 and $4,222 with affiliated companies for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     “Accounts and notes receivable” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet includes $701 and $1,722 due from affiliated companies at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. “Accounts payable” includes $289 and $374 due to affiliated companies at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.



FS-42


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 11 Operating Segments and Geographic Data - Continued

for the chemicals segment are derived primarily from the manufacture and sale of additives for lubricants and fuels.
“All Other” activities include revenues from mining operations, power generation businesses, insurance operations, real estate activities and technology companies.
     Other than the United States, no single country accounted for 10 percent or more of the company’s total sales and other operating revenues in 2009, 2008 and 2007.
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Upstream
             
United States $9,164   $23,503  $18,736 
Intersegment  10,278    15,142   11,625 
    
Total United States  19,442    38,645   30,361 
    
International  13,409    19,469   15,213 
Intersegment  18,477    24,204   19,647 
    
Total International  31,886    43,673   34,860 
    
Total Upstream
  51,328    82,318   65,221 
    
Downstream
             
United States  57,846    87,515   70,535 
Excise and similar taxes  4,573    4,746   4,990 
Intersegment  190    447   491 
    
Total United States  62,609    92,708   76,016 
    
International  76,668    122,064   97,178 
Excise and similar taxes  3,471    5,044   5,042 
Intersegment  106    122   38 
    
Total International  80,245    127,230   102,258 
    
Total Downstream
  142,854    219,938   178,274 
    
Chemicals
             
United States  271    305   351 
Excise and similar taxes  -    2   2 
Intersegment  194    266   235 
    
Total United States  465    573   588 
    
International  1,231    1,388   1,143 
Excise and similar taxes  65    55   86 
Intersegment  132    154   142 
    
Total International  1,428    1,597   1,371 
    
Total Chemicals
  1,893    2,170   1,959 
    
All Other
             
United States  665    815   757 
Intersegment  964    917   760 
    
Total United States  1,629    1,732   1,517 
    
International  39    52   58 
Intersegment  33    33   31 
    
Total International  72    85   89 
    
Total All Other
  1,701    1,817   1,606 
    
Segment Sales and Other
             
Operating Revenues
             
United States  84,145    133,658   108,482 
International  113,631    172,585   138,578 
    
Total Segment Sales and Other
Operating Revenues
  197,776    306,243   247,060 
Elimination of intersegment sales  (30,374)   (41,285)  (32,969)
    
Total Sales and Other
Operating Revenues
 $167,402   $264,958  $214,091 
    
Segment Income TaxesSegment income tax expense for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Upstream
             
United States $1,225   $3,693  $2,541 
International  7,686    15,132   11,307 
    
Total Upstream
  8,911    18,825   13,848 
    
Downstream
             
United States  (111)   815   520 
International  182    813   400 
    
Total Downstream
  71    1,628   920 
    
Chemicals
             
United States  54    (22)  6 
International  46    47   36 
    
Total Chemicals
  100    25   42 
    
All Other
  (1,117)   (1,452)  (1,331)
    
Total Income Tax Expense
 $7,965   $19,026  $13,479 
    
Other Segment InformationAdditional information for the segmentation of major equity affiliates is contained in Note 12, beginning on page FS-43. Information related to properties, plant and equipment by segment is contained in Note 13, on page FS-45.


FS-42





Note 12
Investments and Advances
Equity in earnings, together with investments in and advances to companies accounted for using the equity method and other investments accounted for at or below cost, is shown in the table below. For certain equity affiliates, Chevron pays its share of some income taxes directly. For such affiliates, the equity in earnings does not include these taxes, which are reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income as “Income tax expense.”
                      
  Investments and Advances   Equity in Earnings 
  At December 31   Year ended December 31 
  2009  2008   2009  2008  2007 
    
Upstream
                     
Tengizchevroil $5,938  $6,290   $2,216  $3,220  $2,135 
Petropiar/Hamaca  1,139   1,130    122   317   327 
Petroboscan  832   816    171   244   185 
Angola LNG Limited  1,853   1,191    (12)  (8)  21 
Other  686   725    118   206   204 
    
Total Upstream  10,448   10,152    2,615   3,979   2,872 
    
Downstream
                     
GS Caltex Corporation  2,406   2,601    (191)  444   217 
Caspian Pipeline Consortium  852   749    105   103   102 
Star Petroleum Refining                     
Company Ltd.  873   877    (4)  22   157 
Caltex Australia Ltd.  740   723    11   250   129 
Colonial Pipeline Company  514   536    51   32   39 
Other  1,773   1,664    311   354   318 
    
Total Downstream  7,158   7,150    283   1,205   962 
    
Chemicals
                     
Chevron Phillips Chemical                     
Company LLC  2,327   2,037    328   158   380 
Other  28   25    7   4   6 
    
Total Chemicals  2,355   2,062    335   162   386 
    
All Other
                     
Other  507   567    83   20   (76)
    
Total equity method $20,468  $19,931   $3,316  $5,366  $4,144 
Other at or below cost  690   989              
             
Total investments and advances $21,158  $20,920              
    
Total United States $4,195  $4,002   $511  $307  $478 
Total International $16,963  $16,918   $2,805  $5,059  $3,666 
    
     Descriptions of major affiliates, including significant differences between the company’s carrying value of its investments and its underlying equity in the net assets of the affiliates, are as follows:
Tengizchevroil Chevron has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Tengizchevroil (TCO), a joint venture formed in 1993 to develop the Tengiz and Korolev crude-oil fields in Kazakhstan over a 40-year period. At December 31, 2009, the company’s carrying value of its investment in TCO was about $200 higher than the amount of underlying equity in TCO’s net assets. This difference results from Chevron acquiring
a portion of its interest in TCO at a value greater than the underlying book value for that portion of TCO’s net assets. See Note 7, on page FS-36, for summarized financial information for 100 percent of TCO.
PetropiarChevron has a 30 percent interest in Petropiar, a joint stock company formed in 2008 to operate the Hamaca heavy-oil production and upgrading project. The project, located in Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt, has a 25-year contract term. Prior to the formation of Petropiar, Chevron had a 30 percent interest in the Hamaca project. At December 31, 2009, the company’s carrying value of its investment in Petropiar was approximately $195 less than the amount of underlying equity in Petropiar’s net assets. The difference represents the excess of Chevron’s underlying equity in Petropiar’s net assets over the net book value of the assets contributed to the venture.
PetroboscanChevron has a 39 percent interest in Petroboscan, a joint stock company formed in 2006 to operate the Boscan Field in Venezuela until 2026. Chevron previously operated the field under an operating service agreement. At December 31, 2009, the company’s carrying value of its investment in Petroboscan was approximately $275 higher than the amount of underlying equity in Petroboscan’s net assets. The difference reflects the excess of the net book value of the assets contributed by Chevron over its underlying equity in Petroboscan’s net assets.
Angola LNG Ltd.Chevron has a 36 percent interest in Angola LNG Ltd., which will process and liquefy natural gas produced in Angola for delivery to international markets.
GS Caltex CorporationChevron owns 50 percent of GS Caltex Corporation, a joint venture with GS Holdings. The joint venture imports, refines and markets petroleum products and petrochemicals, predominantly in South Korea.
Caspian Pipeline ConsortiumChevron has a 15 percent interest in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, which provides the critical export route for crude oil from both TCO and Karachaganak.
Star Petroleum Refining Company Ltd.Chevron has a 64 percent equity ownership interest in Star Petroleum Refining Company Ltd. (SPRC), which owns the Star Refinery in Thailand. The Petroleum Authority of Thailand owns the remaining 36 percent of SPRC.
Caltex Australia Ltd.Chevron has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Caltex Australia Ltd. (CAL). The remaining 50 percent of CAL is publicly owned. At December 31, 2009,


FS-43


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 12Investments and Advances - Continued

the fair value of Chevron’s share of CAL common stock was approximately $1,120.
Colonial Pipeline CompanyChevron owns an approximate 23 percent equity interest in the Colonial Pipeline Company. The Colonial Pipeline system runs from Texas to New Jersey and transports petroleum products in a 13-state market. At December 31, 2009, the company’s carrying value of its investment in Colonial Pipeline was approximately $550 higher than the amount of underlying equity in Colonial Pipeline net assets. This difference primarily relates to purchase price adjustments from the acquisition of Unocal Corporation.
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLCChevron owns 50 percent of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC. The other half is owned by ConocoPhillips Corporation.
Other Information“Sales and other operating revenues” on the Consolidated Statement of Income includes $10,391, $15,390 and $11,555 with affiliated companies for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. “Purchased crude oil and products” includes
$4,631, $6,850 and $5,464 with affiliated companies for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
     The following table provides summarized financial information on a 100 percent basis for all equity affiliates as well as Chevron’s total share, which includes Chevron loans to affiliates of $2,820 at December 31, 2008.
                          
  Affiliates   Chevron Share 
Year ended December 31 2008  2007  2006   2008  2007  2006 
    
Total revenues $112,707  $94,864  $73,746   $54,055  $46,579  $35,695 
Income before income tax expense  17,500   12,510   10,973    7,532   5,836   5,295 
Net income  12,705   9,743   7,905    5,524   4,550   4,072 
    
At December 31
                         
    
Current assets $25,194  $26,360  $19,769   $10,804  $11,914  $8,944 
Noncurrent assets  51,878   48,440   49,896    20,129   19,045   18,575 
Current liabilities  17,727   19,033   15,254    7,474   9,009   6,818 
Noncurrent liabilities  21,049   22,757   24,059    4,533   3,745   3,902 
    
Net equity $38,296  $33,010  $30,352   $18,926  $18,205  $16,799 
    

Note 13
Properties, Plant

     “Accounts and notes receivable” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet includes $1,125 and $701 due from affiliated companies at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. “Accounts payable” includes $345 and $289 due to affiliated companiesat December 31, 2009 and Equipment
                                                    
  At December 31   Year ended December 31 
  Gross Investment at Cost   Net Investment   Additions at Cost1   Depreciation Expense2 
  2008  2007  2006   2008  2007  2006   2008  2007  2006   2008  2007  2006 
          
Upstream
                                                   
United States $54,156  $50,991  $46,191   $22,294  $19,850  $16,706   $5,374  $5,725  $3,739   $2,683  $2,700  $2,374 
International  84,282   71,408   61,281    51,140   43,431   37,730    13,177   10,512   7,290    5,441   4,605   3,888 
          
Total Upstream  138,438   122,399   107,472    73,434   63,281   54,436    18,551   16,237   11,029    8,124   7,305   6,262 
          
Downstream
                                                   
United States  17,394   15,807   14,553    8,977   7,685   6,741    2,032   1,514   1,109    629   509   474 
International  11,587   10,471   11,036    6,001   4,690   5,233    2,285   519   532    469   633   551 
          
Total Downstream  28,981   26,278   25,589    14,978   12,375   11,974    4,317   2,033   1,641    1,098   1,142   1,025 
          
Chemicals
                                                   
United States  725   678   645    338   308   289    50   40   25    19   19   19 
International  828   815   771    496   453   431    72   53   54    33   26   24 
          
Total Chemicals  1,553   1,493   1,416    834   761   720    122   93   79    52   45   43 
          
All Other3
                                                   
United States  4,310   3,873   3,243    2,523   2,179   1,709    598   680   270    250   215   171 
International  17   41   27    11   14   19    5   5   8    4   1   5 
          
Total All Other  4,327   3,914   3,270    2,534   2,193   1,728    603   685   278    254   216   176 
          
Total United States  76,585   71,349   64,632    34,132   30,022   25,445    8,054   7,959   5,143    3,581   3,443   3,038 
Total International  96,714   82,735   73,115    57,648   48,588   43,413    15,539   11,089   7,884    5,947   5,265   4,468 
          
Total
 $ 173,299  $ 154,084  $ 137,747   $ 91,780  $ 78,610  $ 68,858   $ 23,593  $ 19,048  $ 13,027   $ 9,528  $ 8,708  $ 7,506 
          
1 Net of dry hole expense related to prior years’ expenditures of $55, $89 and $120 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
2 Depreciation expense includes accretion expense of $430, $399 and $275 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
3 Primarily mining operations, power generation businesses, real estate assets and management information systems.

Note 14
Accounting for Buy/Sell Contracts

The company adopted the accounting prescribed by Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 04-13,Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty(Issue 04-13), on a prospective basis from April 1, 2006. Issue 04-13 requires that two or more legally separate exchange transactions with the same counterparty, including buy/sell transactions, be combined and considered as a single arrangement for purposes of applying the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29,Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,when the transactions are entered into “in


     The following table provides summarized financial information on a 100 percent basis for all equity affiliates as well as Chevron’s total share, which includes Chevron loans to affiliates of $2,422 at December 31, 2009.
                          
  Affiliates   Chevron Share 
Year ended December 31 2009  2008  2007   2009  2008  2007 
    
Total revenues $81,995  $112,707  $94,864   $39,280  $54,055  $46,579 
Income before income tax expense  11,083   17,500   12,510    4,511   7,532   5,836 
Net income attributable to affiliates  8,261   12,705   9,743    3,285   5,524   4,550 
    
At December 31
                         
    
Current assets $27,111  $25,194  $26,360   $11,009  $10,804  $11,914 
Noncurrent assets  55,363   51,878   48,440    21,361   20,129   19,045 
Current liabilities  17,450   17,727   19,033    7,833   7,474   9,009 
Noncurrent liabilities  21,531   21,049   22,757    5,106   4,533   3,745 
    
Total affiliates’ net equity $43,493  $38,296  $33,010   $19,431  $18,926  $18,205 
    

FS-44

contemplation” of one another. In prior periods, the company accounted for buy/sell transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income as a monetary transaction – purchases were reported as “Purchased crude oil and products”; sales were reported as “Sales and other operating revenues.”
     With the company’s adoption of Issue 04-13, buy/sell transactions beginning in the second quarter 2006 are netted against each other on the Consolidated Statement of Income, with no effect on net income. The amount associated with buy/sell transactions in the first quarter 2006 is shown as a footnote to the Consolidated Statement of Income on page FS-27.


FS-43





Note 13
Properties, Plant and Equipment1
                                                    
  At December 31  Year ended December 31 
  Gross Investment at Cost   Net Investment  Additions at Cost2  Depreciation Expense3 
  2009  2008  2007   2009  2008  2007  2009   2008  2007  2009  2008   2007 
                     
Upstream
                                                   
United States $57,645  $54,156  $50,991   $21,885  $22,294  $19,850  $3,496   $5,374  $5,725    $3,963  $2,683   $2,700 
International  93,177   84,282   71,408    54,253   51,140   43,431   9,750    13,177   10,512   6,651   5,441    4,605 
                     
Total Upstream  150,822   138,438   122,399    76,138   73,434   63,281   13,246    18,551   16,237   10,614   8,124    7,305 
                     
Downstream
                                                   
United States  18,915   17,394   15,807    10,089   8,977   7,685   1,871    2,032   1,514   664   629    509 
International  12,319   11,587   10,471    6,806   6,001   4,690   1,424    2,285   519   437   469    633 
                     
Total Downstream  31,234   28,981   26,278    16,895   14,978   12,375   3,295    4,317   2,033   1,101   1,098    1,142 
                     
Chemicals
                                                   
United States  730   725   678    331   338   308   25    50   40   31   19    19 
International  913   828   815    545   496   453   85    72   53   35   33    26 
                     
Total Chemicals  1,643   1,553   1,493    876   834   761   110    122   93   66   52    45 
                     
All Other4
                                                   
United States  4,569   4,310   3,873    2,548   2,523   2,179   354    598   680   325   250    215 
International  20   17   41    11   11   14   3    5   5   4   4    1 
                     
Total All Other  4,589   4,327   3,914    2,559   2,534   2,193   357    603   685   329   254    216 
                     
Total United States  81,859   76,585   71,349    34,853   34,132   30,022   5,746    8,054   7,959   4,983   3,581    3,443 
Total International  106,429   96,714   82,735    61,615   57,648   48,588   11,262    15,539   11,089   7,127   5,947    5,265 
                     
Total
 $188,288  $173,299  $154,084   $96,468  $91,780  $78,610  $17,008   $23,593  $19,048    $12,110  $9,528   $8,708 
          
1 Other than the United States and Nigeria, no other country accounted for 10 percent or more of the company’s net properties, plant and equipment (PP&E) in 2009 and 2008. Only the United States had more than 10 percent in 2007. Nigeria had net PP&E of $12,463 and $10,730 for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
2 Net of dry hole expense related to prior years’ expenditures of $84, $55 and $89 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
3 Depreciation expense includes accretion expense of $463, $430 and $399 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
4 Primarily mining operations, power generation businesses, real estate assets and management information systems.
Note 14
Litigation
MTBEChevron and many other companies in the petroleum industry have used methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) as a gasoline additive. Chevron is a party to 50 pending lawsuits and claims, the majority of which involve numerous other petroleum marketers and refiners. Resolution of these lawsuits and claims may ultimately require the company to correct or ameliorate the alleged effects on the environment of prior release of MTBE by the company or other parties. Additional lawsuits and claims related to the use of MTBE, including personal-injury claims, may be filed in the future. The company’s ultimate exposure related to pending lawsuits and claims is not determinable, but could be material to net income in any one period. The company no longer uses MTBE in the manufacture of gasoline in the United States.
EcuadorChevron is a defendant in a civil lawsuit before the Superior Court of Nueva Loja in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, brought in May 2003 by plaintiffs who claim to be representatives of certain residents of an area where an oil production consortium formerly had operations. The lawsuit alleges damage to the environment from the oil exploration and production operations and seeks unspecified damages to fund environmental remediation and restoration of the
alleged environmental harm, plus a health monitoring program. Until 1992, Texaco Petroleum Company (Texpet), a subsidiary of Texaco Inc., was a minority member of this consortium with Petroecuador, the Ecuadorian state-owned oil company, as the majority partner; since 1990, the operations have been conducted solely by Petroecuador. At the conclusion of the consortium and following an independent third-party environmental audit of the concession area, Texpet entered into a formal agreement with the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador for Texpet to remediate specific sites assigned by the government in proportion to Texpet’s ownership share of the consortium. Pursuant to that agreement, Texpet conducted a three-year remediation program at a cost of $40. After certifying that the sites were properly remediated, the government granted Texpet and all related corporate entities a full release from any and all environmental liability arising from the consortium operations.
     Based on the history described above, Chevron believes that this lawsuit lacks legal or factual merit. As to matters of law, the company believes first, that the court lacks jurisdiction over Chevron; second, that the law under which plaintiffs bring the action, enacted in 1999, cannot be applied retroactively; third, that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations in Ecuador; and, fourth, that the lawsuit is also barred by the releases from liability previously


FS-45


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 15Litigation

Note 15

Litigation

MTBE  Chevron and many other companies in the petroleum industry have used methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) as a gasoline additive. In October 2008, 59 cases were settled in which the company was a party and which related to the use of MTBE in certain oxygenated gasolines and the alleged seepage of MTBE into groundwater. The terms of this agreement are confidential and not material to the company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
     Chevron is a party to 37 other pending lawsuits and claims, the majority of which involve numerous other petroleum marketers and refiners. Resolution of these lawsuits and claims may ultimately require the company to correct or ameliorate the alleged effects on the environment of prior release of MTBE by the company or other parties. Additional lawsuits and claims related to the use of MTBE, including personal-injury claims, may be filed in the future. The settlement of the 59 lawsuits did not set any precedents related to standards of liability to be used to judge the merits of the claims, corrective measures required or monetary damages to be assessed for the remaining lawsuits and claims or future lawsuits and claims. As a result, the company’s ultimate exposure related to pending lawsuits and claims is not currently determinable, but could be material to net income in any one period. The company no longer uses MTBE in the manufacture of gasoline in the United States.

RFG Patent  Fourteen purported class actions were brought by consumers who purchased reformulated gasoline (RFG) from January 1995 through August 2005, alleging that Unocal misled the California Air Resources Board into adopting standards for composition of RFG that overlapped with Unocal’s undisclosed and pending patents. The parties agreed to a settlement that calls for, among other things, Unocal to pay $48 and for the establishment of acy presfund to administer payout of the award. The court approved the final settlement in November 2008.

Ecuador  Chevron is a defendant in a civil lawsuit before the Superior Court of Nueva Loja in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, brought in May 2003 by plaintiffs who claim to be representatives of certain residents of an area where an oil production consortium formerly had operations. The lawsuit alleges damage to the environment from the oil exploration and production operations, and seeks unspecified damages to fund environmental remediation and restoration of the alleged environmental harm, plus a health monitoring program. Until 1992, Texaco Petroleum Company (Texpet), a subsidiary of Texaco Inc., was a minority member of this consortium with Petroecuador, the Ecuadorian state-owned

oil company, as the majority partner; since 1990, the operations have been conducted solely by Petroecuador. At the conclusion of the consortium and following an independent third-party environmental audit of the concession area, Texpet entered into a formal agreement with the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador for Texpet to remediate specific sites assigned by the government in proportion to Texpet’s ownership share of the consortium. Pursuant to that agreement, Texpet conducted a three-year remediation program at a cost of $40. After certifying that the sites were properly remediated, the government granted Texpet and all related corporate entities a full release from any and all environmental liability arising from the consortium operations.
     Based on the history described above, Chevron believes that this lawsuit lacks legal or factual merit. As to matters of law, the company believes first, that the court lacks jurisdiction over Chevron; second, that the law under which plaintiffs bring the action, enacted in 1999, cannot be applied retroactively to Chevron; third, that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations in Ecuador; and, fourth, that the lawsuit is also barred by the releases from liability previously given to Texpet by the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador. With regard to the facts, the company believes that the evidence confirms that Texpet’s remediation was properly conducted and that the remaining environmental damage reflects Petroecuador’s failure to timely fulfill its legal obligations and Petroecuador’s further conduct since assuming full control over the operations.
     In April 2008, a mining engineer appointed by the court to identify and determine the cause of environmental damage, and to specify steps needed to remediate it, issued a report recommending that the court assess $8,000, which would, according to the engineer, provide financial compensation for purported damages, including wrongful death claims, and pay for, among other items, environmental remediation, health care systems, and additional infrastructure for Petroecuador. The engineer’s report also asserted that an additional $8,300 could be assessed against Chevron for unjust enrichment. The engineer’s report is not binding on the court. Chevron also believes that the engineer’s work was performed and his report prepared in a manner contrary to law and in violation of the court’s orders. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the report in which it asked the court to strike the report in its entirety. In November 2008, the engineer revised the report and, without additional evidence, recommended an increase in the financial compensation for purported damages to a total of $18,900 and an increase in the assessment for purported unjust enrichment to a


FS-44





Note 15Litigation - Continued

total of $8,400. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the revised report, and Chevron will continue a vigorous defense of any attempted imposition of liability.
     Management does not believe an estimate of a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss) can be made in this case. Due to the defects associated with the engineer’s report, management does not believe the report itself has any utility in calculating a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss). Moreover, the highly uncertain legal environment surrounding the case provides no basis for management to estimate a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss).

Note 16
Taxes

Income Taxes

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
    
Taxes on income             
U.S. Federal             
Current $2,879   $1,446  $2,828 
Deferred  274    225   200 
State and local  669    338   581 
    
Total United States  3,822    2,009   3,609 
    
International             
Current  15,021    11,416   11,030 
Deferred  183    54   199 
    
Total International  15,204    11,470   11,229 
    
Total taxes on income $ 19,026   $ 13,479  $ 14,838 
    
     In 2008, before-tax income for U.S. operations, including related corporate and other charges, was $10,682, compared with before-tax income of $7,794 and $9,131 in 2007 and 2006, respectively. For international operations, before-tax income was $32,275, $24,373 and $22,845 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. U.S. federal income tax expense was reduced by $198, $132 and $116 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for business tax credits.
     The reconciliation between the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate and the company’s effective income tax rate is explained in the table below:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
    
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate  35.0%   35.0%  35.0%
Effect of income taxes from international operations at rates different from the U.S. statutory rate  10.2    8.3   10.3 
State and local taxes on income, net of U.S. federal income tax benefit  1.0    0.8   1.0 
Prior-year tax adjustments  (0.1)   0.3   0.9 
Tax credits  (0.5)   (0.4)  (0.4)
Effects of enacted changes in tax laws  (0.6)   (0.3)  0.3 
Other  (0.7)   (1.8)  (0.7)
    
Effective tax rate  44.3%   41.9%  46.4%
    

     The company’s effective tax rate increased from 41.9 percent in 2007 to 44.3 percent in 2008. The increase in the “Effect of income taxes from international operations at rates different from the U.S. statutory rate” from 8.3 percent in 2007 to 10.2 percent in 2008 was mainly due to a greater proportion of income being earned in 2008 in tax jurisdictions with higher tax rates. In addition, the 2007 period included a relatively low tax rate on the sale of downstream assets in Europe. The change in “Other” from a negative 1.8 percent to a negative 0.7 percent primarily related to a lower effective tax rate on the sale of the company’s investment in Dynegy common stock in 2007.
     The company records its deferred taxes on a tax-jurisdiction basis and classifies those net amounts as current or noncurrent based on the balance sheet classification of the related assets or liabilities. The reported deferred tax balances are composed of the following:
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
    
Deferred tax liabilities         
Properties, plant and equipment $18,271   $17,310 
Investments and other  2,225    1,837 
    
Total deferred tax liabilities  20,496    19,147 
    
Deferred tax assets         
Abandonment/environmental reserves  (4,338)   (3,587)
Employee benefits  (3,488)   (2,148)
Tax loss carryforwards  (1,139)   (1,603)
Deferred credits  (3,933)   (1,689)
Foreign tax credits  (4,784)   (3,138)
Inventory  (260)   (608)
Other accrued liabilities  (445)   (477)
Miscellaneous  (1,732)   (1,528)
    
Total deferred tax assets  (20,119)   (14,778)
    
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance  7,535    5,949 
    
Total deferred taxes, net $7,912   $10,318 
    
     Deferred tax liabilities at the end of 2008 increased by approximately $1,300 from year-end 2007. The increase was primarily related to increased temporary differences for properties, plant and equipment.
     Deferred tax assets increased by approximately $5,300 in 2008. The increase related primarily to deferred credits recorded for future tax benefits earned from a new field in Africa ($2,200); increased deferred tax benefits for pension-related obligations ($1,300); and additional foreign tax credits arising from earnings in high-tax-rate international jurisdictions ($1,600), which were substantially offset by valuation allowances.
     The overall valuation allowance relates to foreign tax credit carryforwards, tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences for which no benefit is expected to be realized. Tax loss carryforwards exist in many international jurisdictions. Whereas some of these tax loss carryforwards do not have an expiration date, others expire at various times from


FS-45


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 1614Taxes Litigation - Continued

given to Texpet by the Republic of Ecuador and Petroecuador. With regard to the facts, the company believes that the evidence confirms that Texpet’s remediation was properly conducted and that the remaining environmental damage reflects Petroecuador’s failure to timely fulfill its legal obligations and Petroecuador’s further conduct since assuming full control over the operations.
     In April 2008, a mining engineer appointed by the court to identify and determine the cause of environmental damage, and to specify steps needed to remediate it, issued a report recommending that the court assess $8,000, which would, according to the engineer, provide financial compensation for purported damages, including wrongful death claims, and pay for, among other items, environmental remediation, health care systems and additional infrastructure for Petroecuador. The engineer’s report also asserted that an additional $8,300 could be assessed against Chevron for unjust enrichment. The engineer’s report is not binding on the court. Chevron also believes that the engineer’s work was performed and his report prepared in a manner contrary to law and in violation of the court’s orders. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the report in which it asked the court to strike the report in its entirety. In November 2008, the engineer revised the report and, without additional evidence, recommended an increase in the financial compensation for purported damages to a total of $18,900 and an increase in the assessment for purported unjust enrichment to a total of $8,400. Chevron submitted a rebuttal to the revised report, which the court dismissed. In September 2009, following the disclosure by Chevron of evidence that the judge participated in meetings in which businesspeople and individuals holding themselves out as government officials discussed the case and its likely outcome, the judge presiding over the case petitioned to be recused. In late September 2009, the judge was recused, and in October 2009, the full chamber of the provincial court affirmed the recusal, resulting in the appointment of a new judge. Chevron filed motions to annul all of the rulings made by the prior judge, but the new judge denied these motions. The court has completed most of the procedural aspects of the case and could render a judgment at any time. Chevron will continue a vigorous defense of any attempted imposition of liability.
     In the event of an adverse judgment, Chevron would expect to pursue its appeals and vigorously defend against enforcement of any such judgment; therefore, the ultimate outcome – and any financial effect on Chevron – remains uncertain. Management does not believe an estimate of a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss) can be made in this

case. Due to the defects associated with the engineer’s report, management does not believe the report has any utility in calculating a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss). Moreover, the highly uncertain legal environment surrounding the case provides no basis for management to estimate a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss).
Note 15
Taxes
Income Taxes
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
     
Taxes on income             
U.S. Federal             
Current $128   $2,879  $1,446 
Deferred  (147)   274   225 
State and local             
Current  216    528   356 
Deferred  14    141   (18)
     
Total United States  211    3,822   2,009 
     
International             
Current  7,154    15,021   11,416 
Deferred  600    183   54 
     
Total International  7,754    15,204   11,470 
     
Total taxes on income $7,965   $19,026  $13,479 
     
     In 2009, before-tax income for U.S. operations, including related corporate and other charges, was $1,310, compared with before-tax income of $10,765 and $7,886 in 2008 and 2007, respectively. For international operations, before-tax income was $17,218, $32,292 and $24,388 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. U.S. federal income tax expense was reduced by $204, $198 and $132 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for business tax credits.
     The reconciliation between the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate and the company’s effective income tax rate is explained in the following table:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
     
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate  35.0%   35.0%  35.0%
Effect of income taxes from international
operations at rates different
from the U.S. statutory rate
  10.4    10.1   8.2 
State and local taxes on income, net
of U.S. federal income tax benefit
  0.9    1.0   0.8 
Prior-year tax adjustments  (0.3)   (0.1)  0.3 
Tax credits  (1.1)   (0.5)  (0.4)
Effects of enacted changes in tax laws  0.1    (0.6)  (0.3)
Other  (2.0)   (0.7)  (1.8)
     
Effective tax rate  43.0%   44.2%  41.8%
     

2009 through 2032. Foreign tax credit carryforwards of $4,784 will expire between 2009 and 2018.

     At December 31, 2008 and 2007, deferred taxes were classified in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
    
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ (1,130)  $ (1,234)
Deferred charges and other assets  (2,686)   (812)
Federal and other taxes on income  189    194 
Noncurrent deferred income taxes  11,539    12,170 
    
Total deferred income taxes, net $7,912   $10,318 
    
     Income taxes are not accrued for unremitted earnings of international operations that have been or are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. Undistributed earnings of international consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates for which no deferred income tax provision has been made for possible future remittances totaled $22,428 at December 31, 2008. This amount represents earnings reinvested as part of the company’s ongoing international business. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of taxes that might be payable on the eventual remittance of earnings that are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. At the end of 2008, deferred income taxes were recorded for the undistributed earnings of certain international operations for which the company no longer intends to indefinitely reinvest the earnings. The company does not anticipate incurring significant additional taxes on remittances of earnings that are not indefinitely reinvested.
Uncertain Income Tax Positions  Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(FIN 48), provides the accounting guidance for income tax benefits that are uncertain in nature. Under FIN 48, a company recognizes a tax benefit in the financial statements for an uncertain tax position only if management’s assessment is that the position is “more likely than not” (i.e., a likelihood greater than 50 percent) to be allowed by the tax jurisdiction based solely on the technical merits of the position. The term “tax position” in FIN 48 refers to a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax return that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities for interim or annual periods.

     The following table indicates the changes to the company’s unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended December 31, 2008. The term “unrecognized tax benefits” in FIN 48 refers to the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit measured and recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the guidelines of FIN 48. Interest and penalties are not included.
          
  2008   2007 
    
Balance at January 1 $ 2,199   $ 2,296 
Foreign currency effects  (1)   19 
Additions based on tax positions taken in current year  522    418 
Reductions based on tax positions taken in current year  (17)    
Additions/reductions resulting from current year asset acquisitions/sales  175     
Additions for tax positions taken in prior years  337    120 
Reductions for tax positions taken in prior years  (246)   (225)
Settlements with taxing authorities in current year  (215)   (255)
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations  (58)    
Reductions due to tax positions previously expected to be taken but subsequently not taken on prior year tax returns      (174)
    
Balance at December 31 $2,696   $2,199 
    
     Although unrecognized tax benefits for individual tax positions may increase or decrease during 2009, the company believes that no change will be individually significant during 2009. Approximately 85 percent of the $2,696 of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008, would have an impact on the effective tax rate if subsequently recognized.
     Tax positions for Chevron and its subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to income tax audits by many tax jurisdictions throughout the world. For the company’s major tax jurisdictions, examinations of tax returns for certain prior tax years had not been completed as of December 31, 2008. For these jurisdictions, the latest years for which income tax examinations had been finalized were as follows: United States – 2003, Nigeria – 1994, Angola – 2001 and Saudi Arabia – 2003.
     On the Consolidated Statement of Income, the company reports interest and penalties related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions as “Income tax expense.” As of December 31, 2008, accruals of $276 for anticipated interest and penalty obligations were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, compared with accruals of $198 as of year-end 2007. Income tax expense associated with interest and penalties was $79 and $70 in 2008 and 2007, respectively.


FS-46





Note 1615Taxes - Continued

     The company’s effective tax rate decreased from 44.2 percent in 2008 to 43.0 percent in 2009. The rate was lower in 2009 mainly due to the effect of deferred tax benefits and relatively low tax rates on asset sales, both related to an international upstream project. In addition, a greater proportion of before-tax income was earned in 2009 by equity affiliates than in 2008. (Equity-affiliate income is reported as a single amount on an after-tax basis on the Consolidated Statement of Income.) Partially offsetting these items was the effect of a greater proportion of income earned in 2009 in tax jurisdictions with higher tax rates.
     The company records its deferred taxes on a tax-jurisdiction basis and classifies those net amounts as current or noncurrent based on the balance sheet classification of the related assets or liabilities. The reported deferred tax balances are composed of the following:
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
     
Deferred tax liabilities         
Properties, plant and equipment $18,545   $18,271 
Investments and other  2,350    2,225 
     
Total deferred tax liabilities  20,895    20,496 
     
Deferred tax assets         
Foreign tax credits  (5,387)   (4,784)
Abandonment/environmental reserves  (4,424)   (4,338)
Employee benefits  (3,499)   (3,488)
Deferred credits  (3,469)   (3,933)
Tax loss carryforwards  (819)   (1,139)
Other accrued liabilities  (553)   (445)
Inventory  (431)   (260)
Miscellaneous  (1,681)   (1,732)
     
Total deferred tax assets  (20,263)   (20,119)
     
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance  7,921    7,535 
     
Total deferred taxes, net $8,553   $7,912 
     
     Deferred tax liabilities at the end of 2009 increased by approximately $400 from year-end 2008. The increase was primarily related to increased temporary differences for properties, plant and equipment.
     Deferred tax assets were essentially unchanged in 2009. Increases related to additional foreign tax credits arising from earnings in high-tax-rate international jurisdictions (which were substantially offset by valuation allowances) and to inventory-related temporary differences. These effects were offset by reductions in deferred credits and tax loss carryforwards primarily resulting from the usage of tax benefits in international tax jurisdictions.
     The overall valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets for foreign tax credit carryforwards, tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences. It reduces the deferred tax assets to amounts that are, in management’s assessment, more likely than not to be realized. Tax loss carryforwards exist in many international jurisdictions. Whereas some of these tax loss carryforwards do not have an expiration date, others expire at various times from 2010 through 2036. Foreign tax credit carryforwards of $5,387 will expire between 2010 and 2019.
     At December 31, 2009 and 2008, deferred taxes were classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
     
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $(1,825)  $(1,130)
Deferred charges and other assets  (1,268)   (2,686)
Federal and other taxes on income  125    189 
Noncurrent deferred income taxes  11,521    11,539 
     
Total deferred income taxes, net $8,553   $7,912 
     
     Income taxes are not accrued for unremitted earnings of international operations that have been or are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. Undistributed earnings of international consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates for which no deferred income tax provision has been made for possible future remittances totaled $20,458 at December 31, 2009. This amount represents earnings reinvested as part of the company’s ongoing international business. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of taxes that might be payable on the eventual remittance of earnings that are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. At the end of 2009, deferred income taxes were recorded for the undistributed earnings of certain international operations for which the company no longer intends to indefinitely reinvest the earnings. The company does not anticipate incurring significant additional taxes on remittances of earnings that are not indefinitely reinvested.
Uncertain Income Tax Positions
Under accounting standards for uncertainty in income taxes (ASC 740-10), a company recognizes a tax benefit in the financial statements for an uncertain tax position only if management’s assessment is that the position is “more likely than not” (i.e., a likelihood greater than 50 percent) to be allowed by the tax jurisdiction based solely on the technical merits of the position. The term “tax position” in the accounting standards for income taxes (ASC 740-10-20) refers to a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax return that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities for interim or annual periods.

Taxes Other Than on Income

              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
United States             
Excise and similar taxes on products and merchandise $4,748   $4,992  $4,831 
Import duties and other levies  1    12   32 
Property and other miscellaneous taxes  588    491   475 
Payroll taxes  204    185   155 
Taxes on production  431    288   360 
     
Total United States  5,972    5,968   5,853 
     
International             
Excise and similar taxes on products and merchandise  5,098    5,129   4,720 
Import duties and other levies  8,368    10,404   9,618 
Property and other miscellaneous taxes  1,557    528   491 
Payroll taxes  106    89   75 
Taxes on production  202    148   126 
     
Total International  15,331    16,298   15,030 
     
Total taxes other than on income $ 21,303   $ 22,266  $ 20,883 
     

Note 17

Short-Term Debt

          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
Commercial paper* $5,742   $3,030 
Notes payable to banks and others with originating terms of one year or less  149    219 
Current maturities of long-term debt  429    850 
Current maturities of long-term capital leases  78    73 
Redeemable long-term obligations         
Long-term debt  1,351    1,351 
Capital leases  19    21 
     
Subtotal  7,768    5,544 
Reclassified to long-term debt  (4,950)   (4,382)
     
Total short-term debt $2,818   $1,162 
     
* Weighted-average interest rates at December 31, 2008 and 2007, were 0.67 percent and 4.35 percent, respectively.

     Redeemable long-term obligations consist primarily of tax-exempt variable-rate put bonds that are included as current liabilities because they become redeemable at the option of the bondholders within one year following the balance sheet date.

     The company periodically enters into interest rate swaps on a portion of its short-term debt. See Note 7, beginning on page FS-36, for information concerning the company’s debt-related derivative activities.

     At December 31, 2008, the company had $4,950 of committed credit facilities with banks worldwide, which permit

the company to refinance short-term obligations on a long-term basis. The facilities support the company’s commercial paper borrowings. Interest on borrowings under the terms of specific agreements may be based on the London Interbank Offered Rate or bank prime rate. No amounts were outstanding under these credit agreements during 2008 or at year-end.
     At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the company classified $4,950 and $4,382, respectively, of short-term debt as long-term. Settlement of these obligations is not expected to require the use of working capital in 2009, as the company has both the intent and the ability to refinance this debt on a long-term basis.

Note 18

Long-Term Debt

Total long-term debt, excluding capital leases, at December 31, 2008, was $5,742. The company’s long-term debt outstanding at year-end 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2008   2007 
     
3.375% notes due 2008 $   $749 
5.5% notes due 2009  400    405 
7.327% amortizing notes due 20141
  194    213 
8.625% debentures due 2032  147    161 
8.625% debentures due 2031  108    108 
7.5% debentures due 2043  85    85 
8% debentures due 2032  74    81 
9.75% debentures due 2020  56    57 
8.875% debentures due 2021  40    46 
8.625% debentures due 2010  30    30 
3.85% notes due 2008      30 
Medium-term notes, maturing from 2021 to 2038 (6.2%)2
  38    64 
Fixed interest rate notes, maturing 2011 (9.378%)2
  21    27 
Other foreign currency obligations (0.5%)2
  13    17 
Other long-term debt (9.1%)2
  15    59 
     
Total including debt due within one year  1,221    2,132 
Debt due within one year  (429)   (850)
Reclassified from short-term debt  4,950    4,382 
     
Total long-term debt $5,742   $5,664 
     
1 Guarantee of ESOP debt.
2 Weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2008.

     Long-term debt of $1,221 matures as follows: 2009 – $429; 2010 – $64; 2011 – $47; 2012 – $33; 2013 – $41; and after 2013 – $607.

     In 2008, debt totaling $822 matured, including $749 of Chevron Canada Funding Company notes. In 2007, $2,000 of Chevron Canada Funding Company bonds matured. The company also redeemed early $874 of Texaco Capital Inc. bonds, at an after-tax loss of approximately $175.



FS-47


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 15 Taxes - Continued

     The following table indicates the changes to the company’s unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended December 31, 2009. The term “unrecognized tax benefits” in the accounting standards for income taxes (ASC 740-10-20) refers to the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit measured and recognized in the financial statements. Interest and penalties are not included.
              
  2009   2008  2007 
     
Balance at January 1 $2,696   $2,199  $2,296 
Foreign currency effects  (1)   (1)  19 
Additions based on tax positions
taken in current year
  459    522   418 
Reductions based on tax positions
taken in current year
      (17)   
Additions/reductions resulting from
current-year asset acquisitions/sales
      175    
Additions for tax positions taken
in prior years
  533    337   120 
Reductions for tax positions taken
in prior years
  (182)   (246)  (225)
Settlements with taxing authorities
in current year
  (300)   (215)  (255)
Reductions as a result of a lapse
of the applicable statute of limitations
  (10)   (58)   
Reductions due to tax positions previously
expected to be taken but subsequently
not taken on prior-year tax returns
         (174)
     
Balance at December 31 $3,195   $2,696  $2,199 
     
     Although unrecognized tax benefits for individual tax positions may increase or decrease during 2010, the company believes that no change will be individually significant during 2010. Approximately 90 percent of the $3,195 of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009, would have an impact on the effective tax rate if subsequently recognized.
     Tax positions for Chevron and its subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to income tax audits by many tax jurisdictions throughout the world. For the company’s major tax jurisdictions, examinations of tax returns for certain prior tax years had not been completed as of December 31, 2009. For these jurisdictions, the latest years for which income tax examinations had been finalized were as follows: United States – 2005, Nigeria – 1994, Angola – 2001 and Saudi Arabia – 2003.
     On the Consolidated Statement of Income, the company reports interest and penalties related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions as “Income tax expense.” As of December 31, 2009, accruals of $232 for anticipated interest and penalty obligations were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet,
compared with accruals of $276 as of year-end 2008. Income tax (benefit) expense associated with interest and penalties was $(20), $79 and $70 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Taxes Other Than on Income
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
     
United States             
Excise and similar taxes on
products and merchandise
 $4,573   $4,748  $4,992 
Import duties and other levies  (4)   1   12 
Property and other
miscellaneous taxes
  584    588   491 
Payroll taxes  223    204   185 
Taxes on production  135    431   288 
     
Total United States  5,511    5,972   5,968 
     
International             
Excise and similar taxes on
products and merchandise
  3,536    5,098   5,129 
Import duties and other levies  6,550    8,368   10,404 
Property and other
miscellaneous taxes
  1,740    1,557   528 
Payroll taxes  134    106   89 
Taxes on production  120    202   148 
     
Total International  12,080    15,331   16,298 
     
Total taxes other than on income $17,591   $21,303  $22,266 
     
Note 1916New Accounting Standards
Short-Term Debt

          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
     
Commercial paper* $2,499   $5,742 
Notes payable to banks and others with
originating terms of one year or less
  213    149 
Current maturities of long-term debt  66    429 
Current maturities of long-term         
capital leases  76    78 
Redeemable long-term obligations         
Long-term debt  1,702    1,351 
Capital leases  18    19 
     
Subtotal  4,574    7,768 
Reclassified to long-term debt  (4,190)   (4,950)
     
Total short-term debt $384   $2,818 
     
*Weighted-average interest rates at December 31, 2009 and 2008, were 0.08 percent and 0.67 percent, respectively.
     Redeemable long-term obligations consist primarily of tax-exempt variable-rate put bonds that are included as current liabilities because they become redeemable at the option of the bondholders within one year following

Note 19

New Accounting Standards

FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (FAS 141-R)In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141-R, which became effective for business combination transactions having an acquisition date on or after January 1, 2009. This standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date to be measured at their respective fair values. It also requires acquisition-related costs, as well as restructuring costs the acquirer expects to incur for which it is not obligated at acquisition date, to be recorded against income rather than included in purchase-price determination. Finally, the standard requires recognition of contingent arrangements at their acquisition-date fair values, with subsequent changes in fair value generally reflected in income.

FASB Staff Position FAS 141(R)-a Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination (FSP FAS 141(R)-a) In February 2009, the FASB approved for issuance FSP FAS 141(R)-a, which became effective for business combinations having an acquisition date on or after January 1, 2009. This standard requires an asset or liability arising from a contingency in a business combination to be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably determined. If it cannot be reasonably determined then the asset or liability will need to be recognized in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, and FASB Interpretation No. 14,Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of the Loss.

FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160)The FASB issued FAS 160 in December 2007, which became effective for the company January 1, 2009, with retroactive adoption of the Standard’s presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. This standard requires ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be presented within the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet but separate from the parent’s equity. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Income. Certain changes in a parent’s ownership interest are to be accounted for as equity transactions and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary is to be initially measured at fair value. Implementation of FAS 160 will not significantly change the presentation of the company’s Consolidated Statement of Income or Consolidated Balance Sheet.

FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161)In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, which became effective for the company on January 1, 2009. This standard amends and expands the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.FAS 161 requires disclosures related to objectives and strategies for using derivatives; the fair-value amounts of, and gains and losses on, derivative instruments; and credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The company’s disclosures for derivative instruments will be expanded to include a tabular representation of the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments on the balance sheet, fair value gains and losses on the income statement and gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges recognized in earnings and other comprehensive income.

FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, Employer’s Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1)In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, which becomes effective with the company’s reporting at December 31, 2009. This standard amends and expands the disclosure requirements on the plan assets of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans to provide users of financial statements with an understanding of: how investment allocation decisions are made; the major categories of plan assets; the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; the effect of fair-value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The company does not prefund its other postretirement plan obligations, and the effect on the company’s disclosures for its pension plan assets as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will depend on the company’s plan assets at that time.

Note 20

Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells

The company accounts for the cost of exploratory wells in accordance with FASB Statement No. 19,Financial and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies(FAS 19), as amended by FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 19-1,Accounting for Suspended Well Costs, which provides that exploratory well costs continue to be capitalized after the completion of drilling when (a) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify completion as a producing well and (b) the enterprise is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. If either condition is not met or if an enterprise obtains information that raises substantial doubt about the economic or operational viability of the project, the exploratory well would be assumed to be impaired, and its costs, net of any salvage value, would be charged to expense.



FS-48



 

the balance sheet date. In 2009, $350 of tax-exempt Gulf Opportunity Zone bonds related to projects at the Pascagoula Refinery were issued.
     The company periodically enters into interest rate swaps on a portion of its short-term debt. At December 31, 2009, the company had no interest rate swaps on short-term debt. See Note 10, beginning on page FS-39, for information concerning the company’s debt-related derivative activities.
     At December 31, 2009, the company had $5,100 of committed credit facilities with banks worldwide, which permit the company to refinance short-term obligations on a long-term basis. The facilities support the company’s commercial paper borrowings. Interest on borrowings under the terms of specific agreements may be based on the London Interbank Offered Rate or bank prime rate. No amounts were outstanding under these credit agreements during 2009 or at year-end.
     At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the company classified $4,190 and $4,950, respectively, of short-term debt as long-term. Settlement of these obligations is not expected to require the use of working capital in 2010, as the company has both the intent and the ability to refinance this debt on a long-term basis.
Note 2017
Long-Term Debt
Total long-term debt, excluding capital leases, at December 31, 2009, was $9,829. The company’s long-term debt outstanding at year-end 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
          
  At December 31 
  2009   2008 
     
3.95% notes due 2014 $1,997   $ 
3.45% notes due 2012  1,500     
4.95% notes due 2019  1,500     
5.5% notes due 2009      400 
8.625% debentures due 2032  147    147 
7.327% amortizing notes due 20141
  109    194 
8.625% debentures due 2031  107    108 
7.5% debentures due 2043  83    85 
8% debentures due 2032  74    74 
9.75% debentures due 2020  56    56 
8.875% debentures due 2021  40    40 
8.625% debentures due 2010  30    30 
Medium-term notes, maturing from         
2021 to 2038 (5.97%)2
  38    38 
Fixed interest rate notes, maturing 2011 (9.378%)2
  19    21 
Other foreign currency obligations      13 
Other long-term debt (6.69%)2
  5    15 
     
Total including debt due within one year  5,705    1,221 
Debt due within one year  (66)   (429)
Reclassified from short-term debt  4,190    4,950 
     
Total long-term debt $9,829   $5,742 
     
1Guarantee of ESOP debt.
2Weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2009.
     Long-term debt of $5,705 matures as follows: 2010 – $66; 2011 – $33; 2012 – $1,520; 2013 – $21; 2014 – $2,020; and after 2014 – $2,045.
     In 2009, $5,000 of public bonds was issued, and $400 of Texaco Capital Inc. bonds matured. In 2008, debt totaling $822 matured, including $749 of Chevron Canada Funding Company notes.

Note 18
New Accounting Standards
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (FAS 168)In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 168, which became effective for the company in the quarter ending September 30, 2009. This standard established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) system as the single authoritative source of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and superseded existing literature of the FASB, Emerging Issues Task Force, American Institute of CPAs and other sources. The ASC did not change GAAP, but organized the literature into about 90 accounting Topics. Adoption of the ASC did not affect the company’s accounting.
Employer’s Disclosures About Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1)In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, which was subsequently codified into ASC 715,Compensation – Retirement Benefits,and became effective with the company’s reporting at December 31, 2009. This standard amended and expanded the disclosure requirements for the plan assets of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Refer to information beginning on page FS-52 in Note 21, Employee Benefits, for these disclosures.
Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860), Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells - ContinuedTransfers of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16)The FASB issued ASU 2009-16 in December 2009. This standard became effective for the company on January 1, 2010. ASU 2009-16 changes how companies account for transfers of financial assets and eliminates the concept of qualifying special-purpose entities. Adoption of the guidance is not expected to have an impact on the company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Consolidation (ASC 810), Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved With Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17)The FASB issued ASU 2009-17 in December 2009. This standard became effective for the company January 1, 2010. ASU 2009-17 requires the enterprise to qualitatively

FAS 19 provides a number of indicators that can assist an entity to demonstrate sufficient progress is being made in assessing the reserves and economic viability of the project.
     The following table indicates the changes to the company’s suspended exploratory well costs for the three years ended December 31, 2008:
              
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Beginning balance at January 1 $1,660   $1,239  $1,109 
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending the determination of proved reserves  643    486   446 
Reclassifications to wells, facilities and equipment based on the determination of proved reserves  (49)   (23)  (171)
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense  (136)   (42)  (121)
Other reductions*         (24)
     
Ending balance at December 31 $2,118   $1,660  $1,239 
     
* Represent property sales and exchanges.

     The following table provides an aging of capitalized well costs and the number of projects for which exploratory well costs have been capitalized for a period greater than one year since the completion of drilling.

              
  At December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period of one year or less $559   $449  $332 
Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period greater than one year  1,559    1,211   907 
     
Balance at December 31 $2,118   $1,660  $1,239 
     
Number of projects with exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period greater than one year*  50    54   44 
     
* Certain projects have multiple wells or fields or both.

     Of the $1,559 of exploratory well costs capitalized for more than one year at December 31, 2008, $874 (27 projects) is related to projects that had drilling activities under way or firmly planned for the near future. An additional $279 (four projects) is related to projects that had drilling activity during 2008. The $406 balance is related to 19 projects in areas requiring a major capital expenditure before production could begin and for which additional drilling efforts were not under way or firmly planned for the near future. Additional drilling was not deemed necessary because the presence of hydrocarbons had already been established, and other activities were in process to enable a future decision on project development.

     The projects for the $406 referenced above had the following activities associated with assessing the reserves and the projects’ economic viability: (a) $107 (two projects) –

government approval of the plan of development received in fourth quarter 2008; (b) $73 (two projects) – continued unitization efforts on adjacent discoveries that span inter-national boundaries; (c) $49 (one project) – alignment of project stakeholders regarding scope and commercial strategy; (d) $46 (one project) – subsurface and facilities engineering studies ongoing with front-end-engineering and design expected in late 2009; (e) $40 (one project) continued review of development options; (f) $91 – miscellaneous activities for 12 projects with smaller amounts suspended. While progress was being made on all 50 projects, the decision on the recognition of proved reserves under SEC rules in some cases may not occur for several years because of the complexity, scale and negotiations connected with the projects. The majority of these decisions are expected to occur in the next three years.
     The $1,559 of suspended well costs capitalized for a period greater than one year as of December 31, 2008, represents 195 exploratory wells in 50 projects. The tables below contain the aging of these costs on a well and project basis:
         
      Number 
Aging based on drilling completion date of individual wells: Amount  of wells 
 
1992 $7   3 
1994–1997  31   4 
1998–2002  176   34 
2003–2007  1,345   154 
 
Total $1,559   195 
 
         
Aging based on drilling completion date of last     Number 
suspended well in project: Amount  of projects 
 
1992 $7   1 
1999  8   1 
2003  69   3 
2004–2008  1,475   45 
 
Total $1,559   50 
 

Note 21

Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation

Compensation expense for stock options for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $168 ($109 after tax), $146 ($95 after tax) and $125 ($81 after tax), respectively. In addition, compensation expense for stock appreciation rights, performance units and restricted stock units was $132 ($86 after tax), $205 ($133 after tax) and $113 ($73 after tax) for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. No significant stock-based compensation cost was capitalized at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
     Cash received in payment for option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $404, $445 and $444, respectively. Actual tax benefits realized for the tax deductions from option exercises were $103, $94 and $91 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.



FS-49


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 2118Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation New Accounting Standards - Continued

     Cash paid to settle performance units and stock appreciation rights was $136, $88 and $68 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Chevron Long-TermIncentive Plan (LTIP)Awards under the LTIP may take the form of, but are not limited to, stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and nonstock grants. From April 2004 through January 2014, no more than 160 million shares may be issued under the LTIP, and no more than 64 million of those shares may be in a form other than a stock option, stock appreciation right or award requiring full payment for shares by the award recipient.

Texaco Stock Incentive Plan (Texaco SIP)  On the closing of the acquisition of Texaco in October 2001, outstanding options granted under the Texaco SIP were converted to Chevron options. These options, which have 10-year contractual lives extending into 2011, retained a provision for being restored. This provision enables a participant who exercises a stock option to receive new options equal to the number of shares exchanged or who has shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations to receive new options equal to the number of shares exchanged or withheld. The restored options are fully exercisable six months after the date of grant, and the exercise price is the market value of the common stock on the day the restored option is granted. Beginning in 2007, restored options were granted under the LTIP. No further awards may be granted under the former Texaco plans.

Unocal Share-Based Plans (Unocal Plans)  When Chevron acquired Unocal in August 2005, outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under various Unocal Plans were exchanged for fully vested Chevron options and appreciation rights. These awards retained the same provisions as the original Unocal Plans. If not exercised, these awards will expire between early 2009 and early 2015.

     The fair market values of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted-average assumptions:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Stock Options
             
Expected term in years1
  6.1    6.3   6.4 
Volatility2
  22.0%   22.0%  23.7%
Risk-free interest rate based on zero coupon U.S. treasury note  3.0%   4.5%  4.7%
Dividend yield  2.7%   3.2%  3.1%
Weighted-average fair value per option granted $15.97   $ 15.27  $ 12.74 
              
Restored Options
             
Expected term in years1
  1.2    1.6   2.2 
Volatility2
  23.1%   21.2%  19.6%
Risk-free interest rate based on zero coupon U.S. treasury note  1.9%   4.5%  4.8%
Dividend yield  2.7%   3.2%  3.3%
Weighted-average fair value per option granted $ 10.01   $ 8.61  $ 7.72 
     
1Expected term

assess if it is basedthe primary beneficiary of a variable-interest entity (VIE), and, if so, the VIE must be consolidated. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on historical exercisethe company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Extractive Industries – Oil and post-vesting cancellation data.
2Volatility rateGas (ASC 932), Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures (ASU 2010-03)In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-03, which became effective for the company on December 31, 2009. The standard amends certain sections of ASC 932,Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas,to align them with the requirements in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s final rule,Modernization of the Oil and Gas Reporting Requirements(the final rule). The final rule was issued on December 31, 2008. Refer to Table V – Reserve Quantity Information, beginning on page FS-69, for additional information on the final rule and the impact of adoption.
Note 19
Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells
Accounting standards for the costs of exploratory wells (ASC 932) provide that exploratory well costs continue to be capitalized after the completion of drilling when (a) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify completion as a producing well and (b) the enterprise is based on historical stock prices overmaking sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. If either condition is not met or if an appropriate period, generally equalenterprise obtains information that raises substantial doubt about the economic or operational viability of the project, the exploratory well would be assumed to be impaired, and its costs, net of any salvage value, would be charged to expense. The accounting standards provide a number of indicators that can assist an entity in demonstrating that sufficient progress is being made in assessing the reserves and economic viability of the project.
     The following table indicates the changes to the expected term.company’s suspended exploratory well costs for the three years ended December 31, 2009:

                  
  2009   2008  2007 
     
Beginning balance at January 1 $2,118   $1,660  $1,239 
Additions to capitalized exploratory
well costs pending the
determination of proved reserves
  663    643   486 
Reclassifications to wells, facilities
and equipment based on the
determination of proved reserves
  (174)   (49)  (23)
Capitalized exploratory well costs             
charged to expense  (172)   (136)  (42)
     
Ending balance at December 31 $2,435   $2,118  $1,660 
     
     The following table provides an aging of capitalized well costs and the number of projects for which exploratory well costs have been capitalized for a period greater than one year since the completion of drilling.
                  
  At December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
     
Exploratory well costs capitalized
for a period of one year or less
 $564   $559  $449 
Exploratory well costs capitalized
for a period greater than one year
  1,871    1,559   1,211 
     
Balance at December 31 $2,435   $2,118  $1,660 
     
Number of projects with exploratory
well costs that have been capitalized
for a period greater than one year*
  46    50   54 
     

     A summary of option activity during 2008 is presented below:

                 
          Weighted-    
      Weighted-  Average    
      Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Shares  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  (Thousands)  Price  Term  Value 
  
                 
Outstanding at
January 1, 2008
  57,357  $54.50         
Granted  12,391  $84.98         
Exercised  (10,758) $53.69         
Restored  1,196  $94.53         
Forfeited  (1,173) $79.53         
Outstanding at
December 31, 2008
  59,013  $61.36  6.5 yrs. $883 
 
Exercisable at
December 31, 2008
  36,934  $51.51  5.2 yrs. $838 
 
*Certain projects have multiple wells or fields or both.
Of the $1,871 of exploratory well costs capitalized for more than one year at December 31, 2009, $1,143 (28 projects) is related to projects that had drilling activities under way or firmly planned for the near future. The $728 balance is related to 18 projects in areas requiring a major capital expenditure before production could begin and for which additional drilling efforts were not under way or firmly planned for the near future. Additional drilling was not deemed necessary because the presence of hydrocarbons had already been established, and other activities were in process to enable a future decision on project development.

     The total intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between the exercise price and the market price) of options exercised during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $433, $423 and $281, respectively. During this period, the company continued its practice of issuing treasury shares upon exercise of these awards.



FS-50





Note 21 Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation - Continued

     As of December 31, 2008, there was $179 of total unrecognized before-tax compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted or restored under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.

     At January 1, 2008, the number of LTIP performance units outstanding was equivalent to 2,225,015 shares. During 2008, 888,300 units were granted, 652,897 units vested with cash proceeds distributed to recipients and 59,863 units were forfeited. At December 31, 2008, units outstanding were 2,400,555, and the fair value of the liability recorded for these instruments was $201. In addition, outstanding stock appreciation rights and other awards that were granted under various LTIP and former Texaco and Unocal programs totaled approximately 1.4 million equivalent shares as of December 31, 2008. A liability of $35 was recorded for these awards.

Broad-Based Employee Stock Options  In addition to the plans described above, Chevron granted all eligible employees stock options or equivalents in 1998. The options vested in February 2000 and expired in February 2008. A total of 9,641,600 options were awarded with an exercise price of $38.16 per share.

     The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated at $9.54 using the Black-Scholes model for the preceding 10 years. The assumptions used in the model, based on a 10-year average, were: a risk-free interest rate of 7 percent, a dividend yield of 4.2 percent, an expected life of seven years and a volatility of 24.7 percent.
     At January 1, 2008, the number of broad-based employee stock options outstanding was 652,715. Through the conclusion of the program in February 2008, 396,875 shares were exercised and 255,840 shares were forfeited. The total intrinsic value of these options exercised during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $18, $30, and $10, respectively.

Note 22
Employee Benefit Plans
The company has defined-benefit pension plans for many employees. The company typically prefunds defined-benefit plans as required by local regulations or in certain situations where prefunding provides economic advantages. In the United States, all qualified plans are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) minimum funding standard. The company does not typically fund U.S. nonqualified pension plans that are not subject to funding requirements under laws and regulations because contributions to these pension plans may be less economic and investment returns may be less attractive than the company’s other investment alternatives.
     The company also sponsors other postretirement (OPEB) plans that provide medical and dental benefits, as well as life insurance for some active and qualifying retired employees. The plans are unfunded, and the company and retirees share the costs. Medical coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees in the company’s main U.S. medical plan is secondary to Medicare (including Part D), and the increase to the company contribution for retiree medical coverage is limited to no more than 4 percent per year. Certain life insurance benefits are paid by the company.
     Effective December 31, 2006, the company implemented the recognition and measurement provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), which requires the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of each of its defined benefit pension and OPEB as an asset or liability, with the offset to “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”
     The funded status of the company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 2008 and 2007 is on the following page:


FS-51


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 19 Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells - Continued

     The projects for the $728 referenced above had the following activities associated with assessing the reserves and the projects’ economic viability: (a) $330 (one project) – negotiation of crude-oil and natural-gas transportation contracts and construction agreements; (b) $107 (two projects) – discussion with possible natural-gas purchasers ongoing; (c) $73 (two projects) – continued unitization efforts on adjacent discoveries that span international boundaries while planning on an LNG facility has commenced; (d) $49 (one project) – progression of development concept selection; (e) $47 (one project) – subsurface and facilities engineering studies concluding with front-end engineering and design expected to begin in early 2010; (f) $34 (one project) – reviewing development alternatives; $88 – miscellaneous activities for 10 projects with smaller amounts suspended. While progress was being made on all 46 projects, the decision on the recognition of proved reserves under SEC rules in some cases may not occur for several years because of the complexity, scale and negotiations connected with the projects. The majority of these decisions are expected to occur in the next three years.
     The $1,871 of suspended well costs capitalized for a period greater than one year as of December 31, 2009, represents 149 exploratory wells in 46 projects. The tables below contain the aging of these costs on a well and project basis:
         
      Number 
Aging based on drilling completion date of individual wells: Amount  of wells 
 
1992 $8   3 
1997–1998  15   3 
1999–2003  271   42 
2004–2008  1,577   101 
 
Total $1,871   149 
 
         
Aging based on drilling completion date of last     Number 
suspended well in project: Amount  of projects 
 
1992 $8   1 
1999  8   1 
2003–2004  242   5 
2005–2009  1,613   39 
 
Total $1,871   46 
 
Note 2220
Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation
Compensation expense for stock options for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $182 ($119 after tax), $168 ($109 after tax) and $146 ($95 after tax), respectively. In addition, compensation expense for stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance units and restricted stock units was $170 ($110
after tax), $132 ($86 after tax) and $205 ($133 after tax) for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No significant stock-based compensation cost was capitalized at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
     Cash received in payment for option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $147, $404 and $445, respectively. Actual tax benefits realized for the tax deductions from option exercises were $25, $103 and $94 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
     Cash paid to settle performance units and stock appreciation rights was $89, $136 and $88 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Chevron Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)Awards under the LTIP may take the form of, but are not limited to, stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and nonstock grants. From April 2004 through January 2014, no more than 160 million shares may be issued under the LTIP, and no more than 64 million of those shares may be in a form other than a stock option, stock appreciation right or award requiring full payment for shares by the award recipient.
Texaco Stock Incentive Plan (Texaco SIP) On the closing of the acquisition of Texaco in October 2001, outstanding options granted under the Texaco SIP were converted to Chevron options. These options, which have 10-year contractual lives extending into 2011, retained a provision for being restored. This provision enables a participant who exercises a stock option to receive new options equal to the number of shares exchanged or who has shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations to receive new options equal to the number of shares exchanged or withheld. The restored options are fully exercisable six months after the date of grant, and the exercise price is the market value of the common stock on the day the restored option is granted. Beginning in 2007, restored options were issued under the LTIP. No further awards may be granted under the former Texaco plans.
Unocal Share-Based Plans (Unocal Plans)When Chevron acquired Unocal in August 2005, outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under various Unocal Plans were exchanged for fully vested Chevron options and appreciation rights. These awards retained the same provisions as the original Unocal Plans. If not exercised, these awards will expire between early 2010 and early 2015.


FS-51


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 20 Stock Options and Other Share-Based
               Compensation - Continued

     The fair market values of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted-average assumptions:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
     
Stock Options
             
Expected term in years1
  6.0    6.1   6.3 
Volatility2
  30.2%   22.0%  22.0%
Risk-free interest rate based on
zero coupon U.S. treasury note
  2.1%   3.0%  4.5%
Dividend yield  3.2%   2.7%  3.2%
Weighted-average fair value per
option granted
 $15.36   $15.97  $15.27 
              
Restored Options
             
Expected term in years1
  1.2    1.2   1.6 
Volatility2
  45.0%   23.1%  21.2%
Risk-free interest rate based on
zero coupon U.S. treasury note
  1.1%   1.9%  4.5%
Dividend yield  3.5%   2.7%  3.2%
Weighted-average fair value per
option granted
 $12.38   $10.01  $8.61 
     
1Expected term is based on historical exercise and postvesting cancellation data.
2Volatility rate is based on historical stock prices over an appropriate period, generally equal to the expected term.
     A summary of option activity during 2009 is presented below:
                 
          Weighted-    
      Weighted-  Average    
      Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Shares  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  (Thousands)  Price  Term  Value 
 
Outstanding at
January 1, 2009
  59,013  $61.36         
Granted  14,709  $69.69         
Exercised  (3,418) $45.75         
Restored  1  $70.40         
Forfeited  (842) $76.02         
Outstanding at
December 31, 2009
  69,463  $63.70  6.4 yrs $1,019 
 
Exercisable at
December 31, 2009
  44,120  $57.34  5.1 yrs $904 
 
     The total intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between the exercise price and the market price) of options exercised during 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $91, $433 and $423, respectively. During this period, the company continued its practice of issuing treasury shares upon exercise of these awards.
     As of December 31, 2009, there was $233 of total unrecognized before-tax compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted or restored under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
     At January 1, 2009, the number of LTIP performance units outstanding was equivalent to 2,400,555 shares. During 2009, 992,800 units were granted, 668,953 units vested with cash proceeds distributed to recipients and 45,294 units were forfeited. At December 31, 2009, units outstanding were 2,679,108, and the fair value of the liability recorded for these instruments was $233. In addition, outstanding stock appreciation rights and other awards that were granted under various LTIP and former Texaco and Unocal programs totaled approximately 1.5 million equivalent shares as of December 31, 2009. A liability of $45 was recorded for these awards.
     In March 2009, Chevron granted all eligible LTIP employees restricted stock units in lieu of annual cash bonus. The expense associated with these special restricted stock units was recognized at the time of the grants. A total of 453,965 units were granted at $69.70 per unit at the time of the grant. Total fair value of the special restricted stock units was $32 as of December 31, 2009. All of the special restricted stock units will be payable in November 2010.
Note 21
Employee Benefit Plans
The company has defined benefit pension plans for many employees. The company typically prefunds defined benefit plans as required by local regulations or in certain situations where prefunding provides economic advantages. In the United States, all qualified plans are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) minimum funding standard. The company does not typically fund U.S. nonqualified pension plans that are not subject to funding requirements under laws and regulations because contributions to these pension plans may be less economic and investment returns may be less attractive than the company’s other investment alternatives.
     The company also sponsors other postretirement (OPEB) plans that provide medical and dental benefits, as well as life insurance for some active and qualifying retired employees. The plans are unfunded, and the company and retirees share the costs. Medical coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees in the company’s main U.S. medical plan is secondary to Medicare (including Part D), and the increase to the company contribution for retiree medical coverage is limited to no more than 4 percent per year. Certain life insurance benefits are paid by the company.
     Under accounting standards for postretirement benefits (ASC 715), the company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of each of its defined benefit pension and OPEB as an asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
     The funded status of the company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 2009 and 2008 is on the following page:


FS-52



Note 21Employee Benefit Plans - Continued

                           
  Pension Benefits    
  2008   2007  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  2008   2007 
           
Change in Benefit Obligation
                          
Benefit obligation at January 1 $8,395  $4,633   $8,792  $4,207  $2,939   $3,257 
Service cost  250   132    260   125   44    49 
Interest cost  499   292    483   255   178    184 
Plan participants’ contributions     9       7   152    122 
Plan amendments     32    (301)  97        
Curtailments            (12)       
Actuarial gain  (62)  (104)   (131)  (40)  (14)   (413)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes     (858)      219   (28)   12 
Benefits paid  (955)  (246)   (708)  (225)  (340)   (272)
Special termination benefits     1               
           
Benefit obligation at December 31  8,127   3,891    8,395   4,633   2,931    2,939 
           
Change in Plan Assets
                          
Fair value of plan assets at January 1  7,918   3,892    7,941   3,456        
Actual return on plan assets  (2,092)  (655)   607   232        
Foreign currency exchange rate changes     (662)      183        
Employer contributions  577   262    78   239   188    150 
Plan participants’ contributions     9       7   152    122 
Benefits paid  (955)  (246)   (708)  (225)  (340)   (272)
           
Fair value of plan assets at December 31  5,448   2,600    7,918   3,892        
           
Funded Status at December 31
 $(2,679) $(1,291)  $(477) $(741) $(2,931)  $(2,939)
          

     Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans at December 31, 2008 and 2007, include:

                           
  Pension Benefits    
  2008   2007  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  2008   2007 
           
Deferred charges and other assets $6  $31   $181  $279  $   $ 
Accrued liabilities  (72)  (61)   (68)  (55)  (209)   (207)
Reserves for employee benefit plans  (2,613)  (1,261)   (590)  (965)  (2,722)   (2,732)
           
Net amount recognized at December 31
 $(2,679) $(1,291)  $(477) $(741) $(2,931)  $(2,939)
          

     Amounts recognized on a before-tax basis in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for the company’s pension and OPEB postretirement plans were $5,831 and $2,990 at the end of 2008 and 2007. These amounts consisted of:

                           
  Pension Benefits    
  2008   2007  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  2008   2007 
           
Net actuarial loss $3,797  $1,804   $1,539  $1,237  $410   $490 
Prior-service (credit) costs  (68)  211    (75)  203   (323)   (404)
           
Total recognized at December 31
 $3,729  $2,015   $1,464  $1,440  $87   $86 
         

     The accumulated benefit obligations for all U.S. and international pension plans were $7,376 and $3,273, respectively, at December 31, 2008, and $7,712 and $4,000, respectively, at December 31, 2007.

     Information for U.S. and international pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007, was:

                  
  Pension Benefits 
  2008   2007 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l. 
     
Projected benefit obligations $8,121  $2,906   $678  $1,089 
Accumulated benefit obligations  7,371   2,539    638   926 
Fair value of plan assets  5,436   1,698    20   271 
     

                           
  Pension Benefits    
  2009   2008  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  2009   2008 
          
Change in Benefit Obligation                          
Benefit obligation at January 1 $8,127  $3,891   $8,395  $4,633  $2,931   $2,939 
Service cost  266   128    250   132   43    44 
Interest cost  481   292    499   292   180    178 
Plan participants’ contributions     7       9   145    152 
Plan amendments  1   10       32   20     
Curtailments               (5)    
Actuarial loss (gain)  1,391   299    (62)  (104)  56    (14)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes     333       (858)  27    (28)
Benefits paid  (602)  (245)   (955)  (246)  (332)   (340)
Special termination benefits            1        
          
Benefit obligation at December 31  9,664   4,715    8,127   3,891   3,065    2,931 
          
Change in Plan Assets                          
Fair value of plan assets at January 1  5,448   2,600    7,918   3,892        
Actual return on plan assets  964   402    (2,092)  (655)       
Foreign currency exchange rate changes     226       (662)       
Employer contributions  1,494   245    577   262   187    188 
Plan participants’ contributions     7       9   145    152 
Benefits paid  (602)  (245)   (955)  (246)  (332)   (340)
          
Fair value of plan assets at December 31  7,304   3,235    5,448   2,600        
          
Funded Status at December 31 $(2,360) $(1,480)  $(2,679) $(1,291) $(3,065)  $(2,931)
       
     Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans at December 31, 2009 and 2008, include:
                           
  Pension Benefits    
  2009   2008  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  2009   2008 
          
Deferred charges and other assets $6  $37   $6  $31  $   $ 
Accrued liabilities  (66)  (67)   (72)  (61)  (208)   (209)
Reserves for employee benefit plans  (2,300)  (1,450)   (2,613)  (1,261)  (2,857)   (2,722)
          
Net amount recognized at December 31
 $(2,360) $(1,480)  $(2,679) $(1,291) $(3,065)  $(2,931)
       
     Amounts recognized on a before-tax basis in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for the company’s pension and OPEB plans were $6,454 and $5,831 at the end of 2009 and 2008, respectively. These amounts consisted of:
                           
  Pension Benefits    
  2009   2008  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  2009   2008 
          
Net actuarial loss $4,181  $1,889   $3,797  $1,804  $465   $410 
Prior-service (credit) costs  (60)  201    (68)  211   (222)   (323)
          
Total recognized at December 31
 $4,121  $2,090   $3,729  $2,015  $243   $87 
       
     The accumulated benefit obligations for all U.S. and international pension plans were $8,707 and $4,029, respectively, at December 31, 2009, and $7,376 and $3,273, respectively, at December 31, 2008.
     Information for U.S. and international pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008, was:
                  
  Pension Benefits 
  2009   2008 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l. 
     
Projected benefit obligations $9,658  $3,550   $8,121  $2,906 
Accumulated benefit obligations  8,702   3,102    7,371   2,539 
Fair value of plan assets  7,292   2,116    5,436   1,698 
     

FS-53



FS-52





Note 22Employee Benefit Plans - Continued

     The components of net periodic benefit cost for 2008, 2007 and 2006 and amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for 2008 and 2007 are shown in the table below. For 2008 and 2007, changes in pension plan assets and benefit obligations were recognized as changes in other comprehensive income.

                                       
  Pension Benefits    
  2008   2007  2006  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  U.S.  Int’l.  2008   2007  2006 
           
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
                                      
Service cost $250  $132   $260  $125  $234  $98  $44   $49  $35 
Interest cost  499   292    483   255   468   214   178    184   181 
Expected return on plan assets  (593)  (273)   (578)  (266)  (550)  (227)          
Amortization of transitional assets                  1           
Amortization of prior-service (credits) costs  (7)  24    46   17   46   14   (81)   (81)  (86)
Recognized actuarial losses  60   77    128   82   149   69   38    81   97 
Settlement losses  306   2    65      70              
Curtailment losses            3                 
Special termination benefit recognition     1                        
           
Net periodic benefit cost  515   255    404   216   417   169   179    233   227 
           
Changes Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income
                                      
Net actuarial loss (gain) during period  2,624   646    (160)  31         (42)   (401)   
Amortization of actuarial loss  (366)  (79)   (193)  (82)        (38)   (81)   
Prior service cost (credit) during period     32    (301)  97                 
Amortization of prior-service credits (costs)  7   (24)   (46)  (20)        81    81    
           
Total changes recognized in other comprehensive income  2,265   575    (700)  26         1    (401)   
           
Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive Income
 $2,780  $830   $(296) $242  $417  $169  $180   $(168) $227 
           

     Net actuarial losses recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at December 31, 2008, for the company’s U.S. pension, international pension and OPEB plans are being amortized on a straight-line basis over approximately 10, 13 and 10 years, respectively. These amortization periods represent the estimated average remaining service of employees expected to receive benefits under the plans. These losses are amortized to the extent they exceed 10 percent of the higher of the projected benefit obligation or market-related value of plan assets. The amount subject to amortization is determined on a plan-by-plan basis. During 2009, the company estimates actuarial losses of $298, $103 and $28 will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for U.S. pension, international pension and OPEB plans, respectively. In

addition, the company estimates an additional $201 will be recognized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” during 2009 related to lump-sum settlement costs from U.S. pension plans.

     The weighted average amortization period for recognizing prior service costs (credits) recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at December 31, 2008, was approximately nine and 13 years for U.S. and international pension plans, respectively, and eight years for other postretirement benefit plans. During 2009, the company estimates prior service (credits) costs of $(7), $25 and $(81) will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for U.S. pension, international pension and OPEB plans, respectively.



FS-53


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 2221Employee Benefit Plans - Continued

     The components of net periodic benefit cost and amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for 2009, 2008 and 2007 are shown in the table below:
                                       
  Pension Benefits             
  2009   2008  2007  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  U.S.  Int’l.  2009   2008  2007 
           
Net Periodic Benefit Cost                                      
Service cost $266  $128   $250  $132  $260  $125  $43   $44  $49 
Interest cost  481   292    499   292   483   255   180    178   184 
Expected return on plan assets  (395)  (203)   (593)  (273)  (578)  (266)          
Amortization of prior-service                                      
(credits) costs  (7)  23    (7)  24   46   17   (81)   (81)  (81)
Recognized actuarial losses  298   108    60   77   128   82   27    38   81 
Settlement losses  141   1    306   2   65              
Curtailment losses                  3   (5)       
Special termination benefit recognition            1                 
          
Total net periodic benefit cost  784   349    515   255   404   216   164    179   233 
          
Changes Recognized in Other                                      
Comprehensive Income                                      
Net actuarial loss (gain) during period  823   194    2,624   646   (160)  31   82    (42)  (401)
Amortization of actuarial loss  (439)  (109)   (366)  (79)  (193)  (82)  (27)   (38)  (81)
Prior service cost (credit) during period  1   13       32   (301)  97   20        
Amortization of prior-service                                      
credits (costs)  7   (23)   7   (24)  (46)  (20)  81    81   81 
          
Total changes recognized in                                      
other comprehensive income  392   75    2,265   575   (700)  26   156    1   (401)
         
Recognized in Net Periodic                                      
Benefit Cost and Other                                      
Comprehensive Income $1,176  $424   $2,780  $830  $(296) $242  $320   $180  $(168)
        

     Net actuarial losses recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at December 31, 2009, for the company’s U.S. pension, international pension and OPEB plans are being amortized on a straight-line basis over approximately 11, 13 and 10 years, respectively. These amortization periods represent the estimated average remaining service of employees expected to receive benefits under the plans. These losses are amortized to the extent they exceed 10 percent of the higher of the projected benefit obligation or market-related value of plan assets. The amount subject to amortization is determined on a plan-by-plan basis. During 2010, the company estimates actuarial losses of $318, $102 and $26 will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for U.S. pension, international pension and OPEB plans, respec-
tively. In addition, the company estimates an additional $220 will be recognized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” during 2010 related to lump-sum settlement costs from U.S. pension plans.
     The weighted average amortization period for recognizing prior service costs (credits) recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at December 31, 2009, was approximately eight and 12 years for U.S. and international pension plans, respectively, and eight years for other postretirement benefit plans. During 2010, the company estimates prior service (credits) costs of $(7), $27 and $(74) will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for U.S. pension, international pension and OPEB plans, respectively.

AssumptionsThe following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs for years ended December 31:

                                       
  Pension Benefits    
  2008   2007  2006  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  U.S.  Int’l.  2008   2007  2006 
           
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations                                      
Discount rate  6.3%  7.5%   6.3%  6.7%  5.8%  6.0%  6.3%   6.3%  5.8%
Rate of compensation increase  4.5%  6.8%   4.5%  6.4%  4.5%  6.1%  4.0%   4.5%  4.5%
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost                                      
Discount rate1
  6.3%  6.7%   5.8%  6.0%  5.8%  5.9%  6.3%   5.8%  5.9%
Expected return on plan assets  7.8%  7.4%   7.8%  7.5%  7.8%  7.4%  N/A    N/A   N/A 
Rate of compensation increase  4.5%  6.4%   4.5%  6.1%  4.2%  5.1%  4.5%   4.5%  4.2%
           
1 The 2006 U.S. discount rate reflects remeasurement on July 1, 2006, due to plan combinations and changes, primarily several Unocal plans into related Chevron plans.

Expected Return on Plan AssetsThe company’s estimated long-term rate of return on pension assets is driven primarily by actual historical asset-class returns, an assessment of expected future performance, advice from external actuarial firms and the incorporation of specific asset-class risk factors. Asset allocations are periodically updated using pension plan asset/liability studies, and the company’s estimated long-term rates of return are consistent with these studies.
     There have been no changes in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets since 2002 for U.S. plans, which account for 68 percent of the company’s pension plan assets. At December 31, 2008, the estimated long-term rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets was 7.8 percent.
     The market-related value of assets of the major U.S. pension plan used in the determination of pension expense was based on the market values in the three months preceding the year-end measurement date, as opposed to the maximum allowable period of five years under U.S. accounting rules. Management considers the three-month time period long enough to minimize the effects of distortions from day-to-day market volatility and still be contemporaneous to the end of the year. For other plans, market value of assets as of year-end is used in calculating the pension expense.

Discount Rate  The discount rate assumptions used to determine U.S. and international pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations and expense reflect the prevailing rates available on high-quality, fixed-income debt instruments. At December 31, 2008, the company selected a 6.3 percent discount rate for the major U.S. pension and postretirement plans. This rate was based on a cash flow analysis that matched estimated future benefit payments to the Citigroup Pension Discount Yield Curve as of year-end 2008. The discount rates at the end of 2007 and 2006 were 6.3 percent and 5.8 percent, respectively.

Other Benefit Assumptions  For the measurement of accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2008, for the main U.S. postretirement medical plan, the assumed health care cost-trend rates start with 7 percent in 2009 and gradually decline to 5 percent for 2017 and beyond. For this measurement at December 31, 2007, the assumed health care cost-trend rates started with 8 percent in 2008 and gradually declined to 5 percent for 2014 and beyond. In both measurements, the annual increase to company contributions was capped at 4 percent.
     Assumed health care cost-trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for retiree health care costs. The impact is mitigated by the 4 percent cap on the company’s medical contributions for the primary U.S. plan. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost-trend rates would have the following effects:
         
  1 Percent  1 Percent 
  Increase  Decrease 
  
Effect on total service and interest cost components $9  $(8)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation $88  $(75)
  

Plan Assets and Investment Strategy  The company’s pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at December 31 by asset category are as follows:

                  
  U.S.   International 
Asset Category 2008  2007   2008  2007 
     
Equities  52%  64%   47%  56%
Fixed Income  34%  23%   50%  43%
Real Estate  13%  12%   2%  1%
Other  1%  1%   1%   
     
Total  100%  100%   100%  100%
     



FS-54





Note 2221Employee Benefit Plans - Continued

Assumptions The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs for years ended December 31:
                                       
  Pension Benefits    
  2009   2008  2007  Other Benefits 
  U.S.  Int’l.   U.S.  Int’l.  U.S.  Int’l.  2009   2008  2007 
           
Assumptions used to determine
benefit obligations
                                      
Discount rate  5.3%  6.8%   6.3%  7.5%  6.3%  6.7%  5.9%   6.3%  6.3%
Rate of compensation increase  4.5%  6.3%   4.5%  6.8%  4.5%  6.4%  N/A    4.0%  4.5%
Assumptions used to determine
net periodic benefit cost
                                      
Discount rate  6.3%  7.5%   6.3%  6.7%  5.8%  6.0%  6.3%   6.3%  5.8%
Expected return on plan assets  7.8%  7.5%   7.8%  7.4%  7.8%  7.5%  N/A    N/A   N/A 
Rate of compensation increase  4.5%  6.8%   4.5%  6.4%  4.5%  6.1%  N/A    4.5%  4.5%
        

Expected Return on Plan Assets The company’s estimated long-term rates of return on pension assets are driven primarily by actual historical asset-class returns, an assessment of expected future performance, advice from external actuarial firms and the incorporation of specific asset-class risk factors. Asset allocations are periodically updated using pension plan asset/liability studies, and the company’s estimated long-term rates of return are consistent with these studies.
     There have been no changes in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets since 2002 for U.S. plans, which account for 69 percent of the company’s pension plan assets. At December 31, 2009, the estimated long-term rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets was 7.8 percent.
     The market-related value of assets of the major U.S. pension plan used in the determination of pension expense was based on the market values in the three months preceding the year-end measurement date, as opposed to the maximum allowable period of five years under U.S. accounting rules. Management considers the three-month time period long enough to minimize the effects of distortions from day-to-day market volatility and still be contemporaneous to the end of the year. For other plans, market value of assets as of year-end is used in calculating the pension expense.
Discount Rate The discount rate assumptions used to determine U.S. and international pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations and expense reflect the prevailing rates available on high-quality, fixed-income debt instruments. At December 31, 2009, the company selected a 5.3 percent discount rate for the U.S. pension plan and 5.8 percent for the U.S. postretirement benefit plan. This rate was based on a cash flow analysis that matched estimated future benefit payments to the Citigroup Pension Discount Yield Curve as of year-end 2009. The discount rates at the end of 2008 and 2007 were 6.3 percent for the U.S. pension plan and the OPEB plan.
Other Benefit Assumptions For the measurement of accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2009, for the main U.S. postretirement medical plan, the assumed health care cost-trend rates start with 7 percent in 2010 and gradually decline to 5 percent for 2018 and beyond. For this measurement at December 31, 2008, the assumed health care cost-trend rates started with 7 percent in 2009 and gradually declined to 5 percent for 2017 and beyond. In both measurements, the annual increase to company contributions was capped at 4 percent.
     Assumed health care cost-trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for retiree health care costs. The impact is mitigated by the 4 percent cap on the company’s medical contributions for the primary U.S. plan. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost-trend rates would have the following effects:
         
  1 Percent  1 Percent 
  Increase  Decrease 
 
Effect on total service and interest cost components $10  $(9)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation $102  $(87)
 
Plan Assets and Investment Strategy Effective December 31, 2009, the company implemented the expanded disclosure requirements for the plan assets of defined benefit pension and OPEB plans (ASC 715) to provide users of financial statements with an understanding of: how investment allocation decisions are made; the major categories of plan assets; the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; the effect of fair-value measurements using unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets.
     The fair-value hierarchy of inputs the company uses to value the pension assets is divided into three levels:

     The pension plans invest primarily in asset categories with sufficient size, liquidity and cost efficiency to permit investments of reasonable size. The pension plans invest in asset categories that provide diversification benefits and are easily measured. To assess the plans’ investment performance, long-term asset allocation policy benchmarks have been established.
     For the primary U.S. pension plan, the Chevron Board of Directors has approved the following percentage asset-allocation ranges: equities 40–70, fixed income/cash 20–60, real estate 0–15 and other 0–5. The significant international pension plans also have established maximum and minimum asset allocation ranges that vary by each plan. Actual asset allocation, within approved ranges, is based on a variety of current economic and market conditions and consideration of specific asset category risk.
     Equities include investments in the company’s common stock in the amount of $22 and $36 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The “Other” asset category includes minimal investments in private-equity limited partnerships.

Cash Contributions and Benefit Payments  In 2008, the company contributed $577 and $262 to its U.S. and international pension plans, respectively. In 2009, the company expects contributions to be approximately $550 and $250 to its U.S. and international pension plans, respectively. Actual contribution amounts are dependent upon plan-investment returns, changes in pension obligations, regulatory environments and other economic factors. Additional funding may ultimately be required if investment returns are insufficient to offset increases in plan obligations.

     The company anticipates paying other postretirement benefits of approximately $209 in 2009, as compared with $188 paid in 2008.

     The following benefit payments, which include estimated future service, are expected to be paid in the next 10 years:
             
  Pension Benefits  Other 
  U.S.  Int’l.  Benefits 
    
2009 $853  $226  $209 
2010 $841  $249  $216 
2011 $849  $240  $222 
2012 $863  $265  $225 
2013 $874  $277  $230 
2014–2018 $4,379  $1,746  $1,205 
  

Employee Savings Investment Plan  Eligible employees of Chevron and certain of its subsidiaries participate in the Chevron Employee Savings Investment Plan (ESIP).

     Charges to expense for the ESIP represent the company’s contributions to the plan, which are funded either through the purchase of shares of common stock on the open market or through the release of common stock held in the leveraged employee stock ownership plan (LESOP), which follows. Total company matching contributions to employee accounts within the ESIP were $231, $206 and $169 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This cost was reduced by the value of shares released from the LESOP totaling $40, $33 and $6 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The remaining amounts, totaling $191, $173 and $163 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, represent open market purchases.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan  Within the Chevron ESIP is an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). In 1989, Chevron established a LESOP as a constituent part of the ESOP. The LESOP provides partial prefunding of the company’s future commitments to the ESIP.

     As permitted by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 93-6,Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans, the company has elected to continue its practices, which are based on AICPA Statement of Position 76-3,Accounting Practices for Certain Employee Stock Ownership Plans, and subsequent consensus of the EITF of the FASB. The debt of the LESOP is recorded as debt, and shares pledged as collateral are reported as “Deferred compensation and benefit plan trust” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity.
     The company reports compensation expense equal to LESOP debt principal repayments less dividends received and used by the LESOP for debt service. Interest accrued on LESOP debt is recorded as interest expense. Dividends paid on LESOP shares are reflected as a reduction of retained earnings. All LESOP shares are considered outstanding for earnings-per-share computations.
     A net credit to expense of $1 was recorded for the LESOP each year in 2008, 2007 and 2006. The net credit for the respective years was composed of credits to compensation expense of $15, $17 and $18 and charges to interest expense for LESOP debt of $14, $16 and $17.
     Of the dividends paid on the LESOP shares, $35, $8 and $59 were used in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to service LESOP debt. The amount in 2006 included $28 of LESOP debt service that was scheduled for payment on the first business day of January 2007 and was paid in late December 2006. No contributions were required in 2008, 2007 or 2006 as dividends received by the LESOP were sufficient to satisfy LESOP debt service.



FS-55


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 2221Employee Benefit Plans - Continued

     Level 1: Fair values of these assets are measured using unadjusted quoted prices for the assets or the prices of identical assets in active markets that the plans have the ability to access.
     Level 2: Fair values of these assets are measured based on quoted prices for similar assets in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets in inactive markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. If the
asset has a contractual term, the Level 2 input is observable for substantially the full term of the asset. The fair values for Level 2 assets are generally obtained from third-party broker quotes, independent pricing services and exchanges.
     Level 3: Inputs to the fair value measurement are unobservable for these assets. Valuation may be performed using a financial model with estimated inputs entered into the model.
     The fair value measurements of the company’s pension plans for 2009 are below:

     Shares held in the LESOP are released and allocated to the accounts of plan participants based on debt service deemed to be paid in the year in proportion to the total of current year and remaining debt service. LESOP shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, were as follows:
         
Thousands 2008  2007
         
Allocated shares  19,651   20,506
Unallocated shares  6,366   7,365
         
Total LESOP shares  26,017   27,871
 

Benefit Plan Trusts  Prior to its acquisition by Chevron, Texaco established a benefit plan trust for funding obligations under some of its benefit plans. At year-end 2008, the trust contained 14.2 million shares of Chevron treasury stock. The trust will sell the shares or use the dividends from the shares to pay benefits only to the extent that the company does not pay such benefits. The company intends to continue to pay its obligations under the benefit plans. The trustee will vote the shares held in the trust as instructed by the trust’s beneficiaries. The shares held in the trust are not considered outstanding for earnings-per-share purposes until distributed or sold by the trust in payment of benefit obligations.

     Prior to its acquisition by Chevron, Unocal established various grantor trusts to fund obligations under some of its benefit plans, including the deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plans. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, trust assets of $60 and $69, respectively, were invested primarily in interest-earning accounts.

Employee Incentive Plans  Effective January 2008, the company established the Chevron Incentive Plan (CIP), a single annual cash bonus plan for eligible employees that links awards to corporate, unit and individual performance in the prior year. This plan replaced other cash bonus programs, which primarily included the Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and the Chevron Success Sharing program. In 2008, charges to expense for cash bonuses were $757. Charges to expense for MIP were $184 and $180 in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Charges for other cash bonus programs were $431 and $329 in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Chevron also has a Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) for officers and other regular salaried employees of the company and its subsidiaries who hold positions of significant responsibility. Awards under LTIP consist of stock options and other share-based compensation that are described in Note 21 on page FS-49.

Note 23

Other Contingencies and Commitments
Income Taxes  The company calculates its income tax expense and liabilities quarterly. These liabilities generally are subject to audit and are not finalized with the individual taxing authorities until several years after the end of the annual

period for which income taxes have been calculated. Refer to Note 16 beginning on page FS-45 for a discussion of the periods for which tax returns have been audited for the company’s major tax jurisdictions and a discussion for all tax jurisdictions of the differences between the amount of tax benefits recognized in the financial statements and the amount taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The company does not expect settlement of income tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions will have a material effect on its results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.

Guarantees  The company has issued a guarantee of approximately $600 associated with certain payments under a terminal use agreement entered into by a company affiliate. The terminal is expected to be operational by 2012. Over the approximate 16-year term of the guarantee, the maximum guarantee amount will reduce over time as certain fees are paid by the affiliate. There are numerous cross-indemnity agreements with the affiliate and the other partners to permit recovery of any amounts paid under the guarantee. Chevron carries no liability for its obligation under this guarantee.

Indemnifications  The company provided certain indemnities of contingent liabilities of Equilon and Motiva to Shell and Saudi Refining, Inc., in connection with the February 2002 sale of the company’s interests in those investments. The company would be required to perform if the indemnified liabilities become actual losses. Were that to occur, the company could be required to make future payments up to $300. Through the end of 2008, the company paid $48 under these indemnities and continues to be obligated for possible additional indemnification payments in the future.

     The company has also provided indemnities relating to contingent environmental liabilities related to assets originally contributed by Texaco to the Equilon and Motiva joint ventures and environmental conditions that existed prior to the formation of Equilon and Motiva or that occurred during the period of Texaco’s ownership interest in the joint ventures. In general, the environmental conditions or events that are subject to these indemnities must have arisen prior to December 2001. Claims must be asserted no later than February 2009 for Equilon indemnities and no later than February 2012 for Motiva indemnities. Under the terms of these indemnities, there is no maximum limit on the amount of potential future payments. In February 2009, Shell delivered a letter to the company purporting to preserve unmatured claims for certain Equilon indemnities. The letter itself provides no estimate of the ultimate claim amount, and management does not believe the letter provides a basis to estimate the amount, if any, of a range of loss or potential range of loss with respect to the Equilon or the Motiva indemnities. The company posts no assets as collateral and has made no payments under the indemnities.



                                  
  U.S.   Int’l 
  Total Fair Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3   Total Fair Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
     
Equities
                                 
U.S.1
 $2,115  $2,115  $  $   $370  $370  $  $ 
International  977   977          492   492       
Collective Trusts/Mutual Funds2
  1,264   3   1,261       789   94   695    
Fixed Income
                                 
Government  713   149   564       506   54   452    
Corporate  430      430       371   17   336   18 
Mortgage-Backed Securities  149      149       2         2 
Other Asset Backed  90      90       19      19    
Collective Trusts/Mutual Funds2
  326      326       230   14   216    
Mixed Funds3
  8   8          102   14   88    
Real Estate4
  479         479    131         131 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
  743   743          207   207       
Other5
  10  (57)  16   51    16  (3)  18   1 
     
Total at December 31, 2009 $7,304  $3,938  $2,836  $530   $3,235  $1,259  $1,824  $152 
     
1U.S. equities include investments in the company’s common stock in the amount of $29 at December 31, 2009.
2Collective Trusts/Mutual Funds for U.S. plans are entirely index funds; for International plans, they are mostly index funds. For these index funds, the Level 2 designation is based on the restriction that advance notification of redemptions, typically two business days, is required.
3Mixed funds are composed of funds that invest in both equity and fixed income instruments in order to diversify and lower risk.
4The year-end valuations of the U.S. real estate assets are based on internal appraisals by the real estate managers, which are updates of third-party appraisals that occur at least once a year for each property in the portfolio.
5The “Other” asset category includes net payables for securities purchased but not yet settled (Level 1); dividends, interest- and tax-related receivables (Level 2); insurance contracts and investments in private-equity limited partnerships (Level 3).
     The effect of fair-value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in Level 3 plan assets for the period are outlined below:
                             
       Fixed Income          
           Mortgage-          
           Backed          
  U.S. Equities   Corporate  Securities   Real Estate   Other   Total 
              
Total at December 31, 2008 $1   $23  $2   $763   $52   $841 
Actual Return on Plan Assets:                            
Assets held at the reporting date (1)   2      (178)      (177)
Assets sold during the period      5       8        13 
Purchases, Sales and Settlements     (12)      17        5 
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3                      
              
Total at December 31, 2009 $   $18  $2   $610   $52   $682 
              

FS-56





Note 2321 Other Contingencies and CommitmentsEmployee Benefit Plans - Continued

     The amounts payable for the indemnities described on the previous page are to be net of amounts recovered from insurance carriers and others and net of liabilities recorded by Equilon or Motiva prior to September 30, 2001, for any applicable incident.
     In the acquisition of Unocal, the company assumed certain indemnities relating to contingent environmental liabilities associated with assets that were sold in 1997. Under the indemnification agreement, the company’s liability is unlimited until April 2022, when the indemnification expires. The acquirer shares in certain environmental remediation costs up to a maximum obligation of $200, which had not been reached as of December 31, 2008.

Securitization  During 2008, the company terminated the program used to securitize downstream-related trade accounts receivable. At year-end 2007, the balance of securitized receivables was $675 million. As of December 31, 2008, the company had no other securitization arrangements in place.

Long-Term Unconditional Purchase Obligations and Commitments, Including Throughput and Take-or-Pay Agreements  The company and its subsidiaries have certain other contingent liabilities relating to long-term unconditional purchase obligations and commitments, including throughput and take-or-pay agreements, some of which relate to suppliers’ financing arrangements. The agreements typically provide goods and services, such as pipeline and storage capacity, drilling rigs, utilities, and petroleum products, to be used or sold in the ordinary course of the company’s business. The aggregate approximate amounts of required payments under these various commitments are: 2009 – $6,405; 2010 – $3,964; 2011 – $3,578; 2012 – $1,473; 2013 – $1,329; 2014 and after – $4,333. A portion of these commitments may ultimately be shared with project partners. Total payments under the agreements were approximately $5,100 in 2008 $3,700 in 2007 and $3,000 in 2006.

Minority Interests  The company has commitments of $469 related to minority interests in subsidiary companies.

Environmental  The company is subject to loss contingencies pursuant to environmental laws and regulations that in the future may require the company to take action to correct or ameliorate the effects on the environment of prior release of chemicals or petroleum substances, including MTBE, by the company or other parties. Such contingencies may exist for various sites, including, but not limited to, federal Superfund sites and analogous sites under state laws, refineries, crude oil fields, service stations, terminals, land development areas, and mining operations, whether operating, closed or divested. These future costs are not fully determinable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination,

the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.
     Although the company has provided for known environmental obligations that are probable and reasonably estimable, the amount of additional future costs may be material to results of operations in the period in which they are recognized. The company does not expect these costs will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity. Also, the company does not believe its obligations to make such expenditures have had, or will have, any significant impact on the company’s competitive position relative to other U.S. or international petroleum or chemical companies.
     Chevron’s environmental reserve as of December 31, 2008, was $1,818. Included in this balance were remediation activities of 248 sites for which the company had been identified as a potentially responsible party or otherwise involved in the remediation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other regulatory agencies under the provisions of the federal Superfund law or analogous state laws. The company’s remediation reserve for these sites at year-end 2008 was $120. The federal Superfund law and analogous state laws provide for joint and several liability for all responsible parties. Any future actions by the EPA or other regulatory agencies to require Chevron to assume other potentially responsible parties’ costs at designated hazardous waste sites are not expected to have a material effect on the company’s results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.
     Of the remaining year-end 2008 environmental reserves balance of $1,698, $968 related to the company’s U.S. downstream operations, including refineries and other plants, marketing locations (i.e., service stations and terminals), and pipelines. The remaining $730 was associated with various sites in international downstream ($117), upstream ($390), chemicals ($154) and other businesses ($69). Liabilities at all sites, whether operating, closed or divested, were primarily associated with the company’s plans and activities to remediate soil or groundwater contamination or both. These and other activities include one or more of the following: site assessment; soil excavation; offsite disposal of contaminants; onsite containment, remediation and/or extraction of petroleum hydrocarbon liquid and vapor from soil; groundwater extraction and treatment; and monitoring of the natural attenuation of the contaminants.
     The company manages environmental liabilities under specific sets of regulatory requirements, which in the United States include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and various state or local regulations. No single remediation site at year-end 2008 had a recorded liability that was material to the company’s results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.

     The primary investment objectives of the pension plans are to achieve the highest rate of total return within prudent levels of risk and liquidity, to diversify and mitigate potential downside risk associated with the investments, and to provide adequate liquidity for benefit payments and portfolio management.
     The company’s U.S. and U.K. pension plans comprise 84 percent of the total pension assets. Both the U.S. and U.K. plans have an Investment Committee that regularly meets during the year to review the asset holdings and their returns. To assess the plan’s investment performance, long-term asset allocation policy benchmarks have been established.
     For the primary U.S. pension plan, the Chevron Board of Directors has established the following approved asset allocation ranges: Equities 40-70 percent, Fixed Income and Cash 20-60 percent, Real Estate 0-15 percent, and Other 0-5 percent. For the U.K. pension plan, the U.K. Board of Trustees has established the following asset allocation guidelines, which are reviewed regularly: Equities 60-80 percent and Fixed Income and Cash 20–40 percent. The other significant international pension plans also have established maximum and minimum asset allocation ranges that vary by plan. Actual asset allocation within approved ranges is based on a variety of current economic and market conditions and consideration of specific asset category risk. There are no significant concentrations of risk in plan assets due to the diversification of investment categories.
     The company does not prefund its OPEB obligations.
Cash Contributions and Benefit Payments In 2009, the company contributed $1,494 and $245 to its U.S. and international pension plans, respectively. In 2010, the company expects contributions to be approximately $600 and $300 to its U.S. and international pension plans, respectively. Actual contribution amounts are dependent upon plan-investment returns, changes in pension obligations, regulatory environments and other economic factors. Additional funding may ultimately be required if investment returns are insufficient to offset increases in plan obligations.
     The company anticipates paying other postretirement benefits of approximately $208 in 2010, as compared with $187 paid in 2009.
     The following benefit payments, which include estimated future service, are expected to be paid by the company in the next 10 years:
             
  Pension Benefits  Other 
  U.S.  Int’l.  Benefits 
    
2010 $855  $242  $208 
2011 $851  $271  $213 
2012 $861  $284  $217 
2013 $884  $296  $222 
2014 $913  $317  $229 
2015–2019 $ 4,707  $ 1,969  $1,197 
 
Employee Savings Investment PlanEligible employees of Chevron and certain of its subsidiaries participate in the Chevron Employee Savings Investment Plan (ESIP).
     Charges to expense for the ESIP represent the company’s contributions to the plan, which are funded either through the purchase of shares of common stock on the open market or through the release of common stock held in the leveraged employee stock ownership plan (LESOP), which is described in the section that follows. Total company matching contributions to employee accounts within the ESIP were $257, $231 and $206 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This cost was reduced by the value of shares released from the LESOP totaling $184, $40 and $33 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remaining amounts, totaling $73, $191 and $173 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, represent open market purchases.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan Within the Chevron ESIP is an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). In 1989, Chevron established a LESOP as a constituent part of the ESOP. The LESOP provides partial prefunding of the company’s future commitments to the ESIP.
     As permitted by accounting standards for share-based compensation (ASC 718), the debt of the LESOP is recorded as debt, and shares pledged as collateral are reported as “Deferred compensation and benefit plan trust” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Equity.
     The company reports compensation expense equal to LESOP debt principal repayments less dividends received and used by the LESOP for debt service. Interest accrued on LESOP debt is recorded as interest expense. Dividends paid on LESOP shares are reflected as a reduction of retained earnings. All LESOP shares are considered outstanding for earnings-per-share computations.
     Total credits to expense for the LESOP were $3, $1 and $1 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net credit for the respective years was composed of credits to compensation expense of $15, $15 and $17 and charges to interest expense for LESOP debt of $12, $14 and $16.
     Of the dividends paid on the LESOP shares, $110, $35 and $8 were used in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, to service LESOP debt. No contributions were required in 2009, 2008 or 2007 as dividends received by the LESOP were sufficient to satisfy LESOP debt service.


FS-57


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 21 Employee Benefit Plans - Continued

     Shares held in the LESOP are released and allocated to the accounts of plan participants based on debt service deemed to be paid in the year in proportion to the total of current-year and remaining debt service. LESOP shares as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:
          
Thousands 2009   2008 
     
Allocated shares  21,211    19,651 
Unallocated shares  3,636    6,366 
     
Total LESOP shares  24,847    26,017 
     
Benefit Plan Trusts Prior to its acquisition by Chevron, Texaco established a benefit plan trust for funding obligations under some of its benefit plans. At year-end 2009, the trust contained 14.2 million shares of Chevron treasury stock. The trust will sell the shares or use the dividends from the shares to pay benefits only to the extent that the company does not pay such benefits. The company intends to continue to pay its obligations under the benefit plans. The trustee will vote the shares held in the trust as instructed by the trust’s beneficiaries. The shares held in the trust are not considered outstanding for earnings-per-share purposes until distributed or sold by the trust in payment of benefit obligations.
     Prior to its acquisition by Chevron, Unocal established various grantor trusts to fund obligations under some of its benefit plans, including the deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plans. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, trust assets of $57 and $60, respectively, were invested primarily in interest-earning accounts.
Employee Incentive Plans Effective January 2008, the company established the Chevron Incentive Plan (CIP), a single annual cash bonus plan for eligible employees that links awards to corporate, unit and individual performance in the prior year. This plan replaced other cash bonus programs, which primarily included the Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and the Chevron Success Sharing program. In 2009 and 2008, charges to expense for cash bonuses were $561 and $757, respectively. In 2007, charges to expense for MIP were $184 and charges for other cash bonus programs were $431. Chevron also has the LTIP for officers and other regular salaried employees of the company and its subsidiaries who hold positions of significant responsibility. Awards under the LTIP consist of stock options and other share-based compensation that are described in Note 20, on page FS-51.

Note 22
Other Contingencies and Commitments
Income Taxes The company calculates its income tax expense and liabilities quarterly. These liabilities generally are subject to audit and are not finalized with the individual taxing authorities until several years after the end of the annual period for which income taxes have been calculated. Refer to
Note 15 beginning on page FS-46 for a discussion of the periods for which tax returns have been audited for the company’s major tax jurisdictions and a discussion for all tax jurisdictions of the differences between the amount of tax benefits recognized in the financial statements and the amount taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The company does not expect settlement of income tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions will have a material effect on its results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.
Guarantees The company’s guarantee of approximately $600 is associated with certain payments under a terminal use agreement entered into by a company affiliate. The terminal is expected to be operational by 2012. Over the approximate 16-year term of the guarantee, the maximum guarantee amount will be reduced over time as certain fees are paid by the affiliate. There are numerous cross-indemnity agreements with the affiliate and the other partners to permit recovery of any amounts paid under the guarantee. Chevron has recorded no liability for its obligation under this guarantee.
Indemnifications The company provided certain indemnities of contingent liabilities of Equilon and Motiva to Shell and Saudi Refining, Inc., in connection with the February 2002 sale of the company’s interests in those investments. The company would be required to perform if the indemnified liabilities become actual losses. Were that to occur, the company could be required to make future payments up to $300. Through the end of 2009, the company paid $48 under these indemnities and continues to be obligated for possible additional indemnification payments in the future.
     The company has also provided indemnities relating to contingent environmental liabilities related to assets originally contributed by Texaco to the Equilon and Motiva joint ventures and environmental conditions that existed prior to the formation of Equilon and Motiva or that occurred during the period of Texaco’s ownership interest in the joint ventures. In general, the environmental conditions or events that are subject to these indemnities must have arisen prior to December 2001. Claims had to be asserted by February 2009 for Equilon indemnities and must be asserted no later than February 2012 for Motiva indemnities. Under the terms of these indemnities, there is no maximum limit on the amount of potential future payments. In February 2009, Shell delivered a letter to the company purporting to preserve unmatured claims for certain Equilon indemnities. The letter itself provides no estimate of the ultimate claim amount. Management does not believe this letter or any other information provides a basis to estimate the amount, if any, of a range of loss or potential range of loss with respect to either the Equilon or the Motiva indemnities. The company posts no assets as collateral and has made no payments under the indemnities.



FS-58



Note 2322Other Contingencies and Commitments - Continued

     The amounts payable for the indemnities described in the preceding paragraph are to be net of amounts recovered from insurance carriers and others and net of liabilities recorded by Equilon or Motiva prior to September 30, 2001, for any applicable incident.
     In the acquisition of Unocal, the company assumed certain indemnities relating to contingent environmental liabilities associated with assets that were sold in 1997. The acquirer of those assets shared in certain environmental remediation costs up to a maximum obligation of $200, which had been reached at December 31, 2009. Under the indemnification agreement, after reaching the $200 obligation, Chevron is solely responsible until April 2022, when the indemnification expires. The environmental conditions or events that are subject to these indemnities must have arisen prior to the sale of the assets in 1997.
     Although the company has provided for known obligations under this indemnity that are probable and reasonably estimable, the amount of additional future costs may be material to results of operations in the period in which they are recognized. The company does not expect these costs will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity.
Long-Term Unconditional Purchase Obligations and Commitments, Including Throughput and Take-or-Pay Agreements The company and its subsidiaries have certain other contingent liabilities relating to long-term unconditional purchase obligations and commitments, including throughput and take-or-pay agreements, some of which relate to suppliers’ financing arrangements. The agreements typically provide goods and services, such as pipeline and storage capacity, drilling rigs, utilities, and petroleum products, to be used or sold in the ordinary course of the company’s business. The aggregate approximate amounts of required payments under these various commitments are: 2010 – $7,500; 2011 – $4,300; 2012 – $1,400; 2013 – $1,400; 2014 – $1,000; 2015 and after – $4,100. A portion of these commitments may ultimately be shared with project partners. Total payments under the agreements were approximately $8,100 in 2009, $5,100 in 2008 and $3,700 in 2007.
Environmental The company is subject to loss contingencies pursuant to laws, regulations, private claims and legal proceedings related to environmental matters that are subject to legal settlements or that in the future may require the company to take action to correct or ameliorate the effects on the environment of prior release of chemicals or petroleum substances, including MTBE, by the company or other parties. Such contingencies may exist for various sites, including, but not limited to, federal Superfund sites and analogous sites under state laws, refineries, crude-oil fields, service stations, terminals, land development areas, and mining operations,
whether operating, closed or divested. These future costs are not fully determinable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.
     Although the company has provided for known environmental obligations that are probable and reasonably estimable, the amount of additional future costs may be material to results of operations in the period in which they are recognized. The company does not expect these costs will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity. Also, the company does not believe its obligations to make such expenditures have had, or will have, any significant impact on the company’s competitive position relative to other U.S. or international petroleum or chemical companies.
     Chevron’s environmental reserve as of December 31, 2009, was $1,700. Included in this balance were remediation activities at approximately 250 sites for which the company had been identified as a potentially responsible party or otherwise involved in the remediation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other regulatory agencies under the provisions of the federal Superfund law or analogous state laws. The company’s remediation reserve for these sites at year-end 2009 was $185. The federal Superfund law and analogous state laws provide for joint and several liability for all responsible parties. Any future actions by the EPA or other regulatory agencies to require Chevron to assume other potentially responsible parties’ costs at designated hazardous waste sites are not expected to have a material effect on the company’s results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.
     Of the remaining year-end 2009 environmental reserves balance of $1,515, $820 related to the company’s U.S. downstream operations, including refineries and other plants, marketing locations (i.e., service stations and terminals), and pipelines. The remaining $695 was associated with various sites in international downstream ($107), upstream ($369), chemicals ($149) and other businesses ($70). Liabilities at all sites, whether operating, closed or divested, were primarily associated with the company’s plans and activities to remediate soil or groundwater contamination or both. These and other activities include one or more of the following: site assessment; soil excavation; offsite disposal of contaminants; onsite containment, remediation and/or extraction of petroleum hydrocarbon liquid and vapor from soil; groundwater extraction and treatment; and monitoring of the natural attenuation of the contaminants.
     The company manages environmental liabilities under specific sets of regulatory requirements, which in the United


     It is likely that the company will continue to incur additional liabilities, beyond those recorded, for environmental remediation relating to past operations. These future costs are not fully determinable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.
     Refer to Note 24 below for a discussion of the company’s Asset Retirement Obligations.

Equity Redetermination  For oil and gas producing operations, ownership agreements may provide for periodic reassessments of equity interests in estimated crude oil and natural gas reserves. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses that could be material to earnings in any given period. One such equity redetermination process has been under way since 1996 for Chevron’s interests in four producing zones at the Naval Petroleum Reserve at Elk Hills, California, for the time when the remaining interests in these zones were owned by the U.S. Department of Energy. A wide range remains for a possible net settlement amount for the four zones. For this range of settlement, Chevron estimates its maximum possible net before-tax liability at approximately $200, and the possible maximum net amount that could be owed to Chevron is estimated at about $150. The timing of the settlement and the exact amount within this range of estimates are uncertain.

Other Contingencies  Chevron receives claims from and submits claims to customers; trading partners; U.S. federal, state and local regulatory bodies; governments; contractors; insurers; and suppliers. The amounts of these claims, individually and in the aggregate, may be significant and take lengthy periods to resolve.

     The company and its affiliates also continue to review and analyze their operations and may close, abandon, sell, exchange, acquire or restructure assets to achieve operational or strategic benefits and to improve competitiveness and profitability. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses in future periods.

Note 24

Asset Retirement Obligations

The company accounts for asset retirement obligations (ARO) in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations(FAS 143) and FASB Interpretation No. 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143(FIN 47). FAS 143 applies to the fair

FS-59

value of a liability for an ARO that is recorded when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset and the liability can be reasonably estimated. Obligations associated with the retirement of these assets require recognition in certain circumstances: (1) the present value of a liability and offsetting asset for an ARO, (2) the subsequent accretion of that liability and depreciation of the asset, and (3) the periodic review of the ARO liability estimates and discount rates. FIN 47 clarifies that the phrase “conditional asset retirement obligation,” as used in FAS 143, refers to a legal obligation to perform asset retirement activity for which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the company. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement of a conditional ARO should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. FAS 143 acknowledges that in some cases, sufficient information may not be available to reasonably estimate the fair value of an ARO. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an ARO.
     FAS 143 and FIN 47 primarily affect the company’s accounting for crude oil and natural gas producing assets. No significant AROs associated with any legal obligations to retire refining, marketing and transportation (downstream) and chemical long-lived assets have been recognized, as indeterminate settlement dates for the asset retirements prevent estimation of the fair value of the associated ARO. The company performs periodic reviews of its downstream and chemical long-lived assets for any changes in facts and circumstances that might require recognition of a retirement obligation.
     The following table indicates the changes to the company’s before-tax asset retirement obligations in 2008, 2007 and 2006:
              
  2008   2007  2006 
              
Balance at January 1 $  8,253   $  5,773  $  4,304 
Liabilities incurred  308    178   153 
Liabilities settled  (973)   (818)  (387)
Accretion expense  430    399*  275 
Revisions in estimated cash flows  1,377    2,721   1,428 
              
Balance at December 31 $9,395   $8,253  $5,773 
              
*Includes $175 for revision to the ARO liability retained on properties that had been sold.

     In the table above, the amounts associated with “Revisions in estimated cash flows” reflect increasing costs to abandon onshore and offshore wells, equipment and facilities, including an aggregate of $1,804 for 2006 through 2008 for the estimated costs to dismantle and abandon wells and facilities damaged by hurricanes in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in 2005 and 2008. The long-term portion of the $9,395 balance at the end of 2008 was $8,588.



FS-58


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts
Note 2522 Other Contingencies and Commitments - Continued

States include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and various state or local regulations. No single remediation site at year-end 2009 had a recorded liability that was material to the company’s results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity.
     It is likely that the company will continue to incur additional liabilities, beyond those recorded, for environmental remediation relating to past operations. These future costs are not fully determinable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.
     Refer to Note 23 for a discussion of the company’s asset retirement obligations.
Equity Redetermination For oil and gas producing operations, ownership agreements may provide for periodic reassessments of equity interests in estimated crude-oil and natural-gas reserves. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses that could be material to earnings in any given period. One such equity redetermination process has been under way since 1996 for Chevron’s interests in four producing zones at the Naval Petroleum Reserve at Elk Hills, California, for the time when the remaining interests in these zones were owned by the U.S. Department of Energy. A wide range remains for a possible net settlement amount for the four zones. For this range of settlement, Chevron estimates its maximum possible net before-tax liability at approximately $200, and the possible maximum net amount that could be owed to Chevron is estimated at about $150. The timing of the settlement and the exact amount within this range of estimates are uncertain.
Other Contingencies Chevron receives claims from and submits claims to customers; trading partners; U.S. federal, state and local regulatory bodies; governments; contractors; insurers; and suppliers. The amounts of these claims, individually and in the aggregate, may be significant and take lengthy periods to resolve.
     The company and its affiliates also continue to review and analyze their operations and may close, abandon, sell, exchange, acquire or restructure assets to achieve operational or strategic benefits and to improve competitiveness and profitability. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses in future periods.

Note 23
Asset Retirement Obligations
In accordance with accounting standards for asset retirement obligations (ASC 410), the company records the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (ARO) when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset and the liability can be reasonably estimated. The legal obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty may exist about the timing and/or method of settlement that may be beyond the company’s control. This uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement is factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate fair value. The legal obligations associated with the retirement of the tangible long-lived assets require recognition in certain circumstances including: (1) the present value of a liability and offsetting asset for an ARO, (2) the subsequent accretion of that liability and depreciation of the asset, and (3) the periodic review of the ARO liability estimates and discount rates.
     Accounting standards for asset retirement obligations primarily affect the company’s accounting for crude-oil and natural-gas producing assets. No significant AROs associated with any legal obligations to retire refining, marketing and transportation (downstream) and chemical long-lived assets have been recognized, as indeterminate settlement dates for the asset retirements prevent estimation of the fair value of the associated ARO. The company performs periodic reviews of its downstream and chemical long-lived assets for any changes in facts and circumstances that might require recognition of a retirement obligation.
     The following table indicates the changes to the company’s before-tax asset retirement obligations in 2009, 2008 and 2007:
              
  2009   2008  2007 
     
Balance at January 1 $9,395    $8,253  $5,773 
Liabilities incurred  144    308   178 
Liabilities settled  (757)   (973)  (818)
Accretion expense  463    430   399*
Revisions in estimated cash flows  930    1,377   2,721 
     
Balance at December 31 $10,175    $9,395  $8,253 
     
*Includes $175 for revision to the ARO liability retained on properties that had been sold.
     In the table above, the amounts associated with “Revisions in estimated cash flows” reflect increasing costs to abandon onshore and offshore wells, equipment and facilities. The long-term portion of the $10,175 balance at the end of 2009 was $9,289.


FS-60





Note 24
Other Financial Information

Note 25
Other Financial Information
Net income in 2008 included gains of approximately $1,200 relating to the sale of nonstrategic properties. Of this amount, approximately $1,000 related to upstream assets. Net income in 2007 included gains of approximately $2,000 relating to the sale of nonstrategic properties. Of this amount, approximately $1,100 related to downstream assets and $680 related to the sale of the company’s investment in Dynegy Inc.
     Other financial information is as follows:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Total financing interest and debt costs $  256   $  468  $  608 
Less: Capitalized interest  256    302   157 
       
Interest and debt expense $   $166  $451 
     
Research and development expenses $835   $562  $468 
Foreign currency effects* $862   $(352) $(219)
     
*Includes $420, $18
Earnings in 2009 included gains of approximately $1,000 relating to the sale of nonstrategic properties. Of this amount, approximately $600 and $15$400 related to downstream and upstream assets, respectively. Earnings in 2008 included gains of approximately $1,200 relating to the sale of nonstrategic properties. Of this amount, approximately $1,000 related to upstream assets. Earnings in 2007 included gains of approximately $2,000 relating to the sale of nonstrategic properties. Of this amount, approximately $1,100 related to downstream assets and 2006,$680 related to the sale of the company’s investment in Dynegy, Inc.
     Other financial information is as follows:
              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Total financing interest and debt costs $301   $256  $468 
Less: Capitalized interest  273    256   302 
      
Interest and debt expense $28   $  $166 
    
Research and development expenses $603   $702  $510 
Foreign currency effects* $(744)  $862  $(352)
    
*Includes $(194), $420 and $18 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for the company’s share of equity affiliates’ foreign currency effects.
     The excess of replacement cost over the carrying value of inventories for which the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method is used was $5,491 and $9,368 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Replacement cost is generally based on average acquisition costs for the year. LIFO (charges) profits of $(168), $210 and $113 were included in earnings for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
     The company has $4,618 in goodwill on the Consolidated Balance Sheet related to its 2005 acquisition of Unocal. Under the accounting standard for goodwill (ASC 350), the
company tested this goodwill for impairment during 2009 and concluded no impairment was necessary.
     Events subsequent to December 31, 2009, were evaluated until the time of the Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2010.
Note 25
Assets Held for Sale
At December 31, 2009, the company reported no assets as “Assets held for sale” (AHS) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. At December 31, 2008, $252 of net properties, plant and equipment were reported as AHS. Assets in this category are related to groups of service stations, aviation facilities, lubricants blending plants, and commercial and industrial fuels business. These assets were sold in 2009.
Note 26
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is based upon Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation (“earnings”) less preferred stock dividend requirements and includes the effects of deferrals of salary and other compensation awards that are invested in Chevron stock units by certain officers and employees of the company and the company’s share of equity affiliates’ foreign currency effects.stock transactions of affiliates, which, under the applicable accounting rules, may be recorded directly to the company’s retained earnings instead of net income. Diluted EPS includes the effects of these items as well as the dilutive effects of outstanding stock options awarded under the company’s stock option programs (refer to Note 20, “Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation,” beginning on page FS-51). The table below sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS:


              
  Year ended December 31 
  2009   2008  2007 
    
Basic EPS Calculation
             
    
Earnings available to common stockholders – Basic1
 $10,483   $23,931  $18,688 
    
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  1,991    2,037   2,117 
Add: Deferred awards held as stock units  1    1   1 
    
Total weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  1,992    2,038   2,118 
    
Per share of common stock             
Earnings – Basic $5.26   $11.74  $8.83 
    
Diluted EPS Calculation
             
    
Earnings available to common stockholders – Diluted1
 $10,483   $23,931  $18,688 
    
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  1,991    2,037   2,117 
Add: Deferred awards held as stock units  1    1   1 
Add: Dilutive effect of employee stock-based awards  9    12   14 
    
Total weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  2,001    2,050   2,132 
    
Per share of common stock             
Earnings – Diluted $5.24   $11.67  $8.77 
    
1There was no effect of dividend equivalents paid on stock units or dilutive impact of employee stock-based awards on earnings.

     The excess of replacement cost over the carrying value of inventories for which the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method is used was $9,368 and $6,958 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Replacement cost is generally based on average acquisition costs for the year. LIFO profits of $210, $113 and $82 were included in net income for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Note 26
Assets Held for Sale
At December 31, 2008, the company classified $252 of net properties, plant and equipment as “Assets held for sale” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Assets in this category related to groups of service stations, aviation facilities, lubricants blending plants, and commercial and industrial fuels business. These assets are anticipated to be sold in 2009.
Note 27
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is based upon net income less preferred stock dividend requirements and includes the effects of deferrals of salary and other compensation awards that are invested in Chevron stock units by certain officers and employees of the company and the company’s share of stock transactions of affiliates, which, under the applicable accounting rules, may be recorded directly to the company’s retained earnings instead of net income. Diluted EPS includes the effects of these items as well as the dilutive effects of outstanding stock options awarded under the company’s stock option programs (refer to Note 21, “Stock Options and Other Share-Based Compensation” beginning on page FS-49). The table below sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS:


              
  Year ended December 31 
  2008   2007  2006 
     
Basic EPS Calculation
             
Income from operations $23,931   $18,688  $17,138 
Add: Dividend equivalents paid on stock units         1 
     
Net income available to common stockholders – Basic $23,931   $18,688  $17,139 
     
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  2,037    2,117   2,185 
Add: Deferred awards held as stock units  1    1   1 
     
Total weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  2,038    2,118   2,186 
     
Per share of common stock             
Net income – Basic $11.74   $8.83  $7.84 
     
              
Diluted EPS Calculation
             
Income from operations $23,931   $18,688  $17,138 
Add: Dividend equivalents paid on stock units         1 
Add: Dilutive effects of employee stock-based awards          
     
Net income available to common stockholders – Diluted $23,931   $18,688  $17,139 
     
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  2,037    2,117   2,185 
Add: Deferred awards held as stock units  1    1   1 
Add: Dilutive effect of employee stock-based awards  12    14   11 
     
Total weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  2,050    2,132   2,197 
     
Per share of common stock             
Net income – Diluted $11.67   $8.77  $7.80 
     

FS-59


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

FS-60


Five-Year Financial Summary
Unaudited

                      
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 2008   2007  2006  2005  2004 
     
Statement of Income Data
                     
Revenues and Other Income
                     
Total sales and other operating revenues1,2
 $264,958   $214,091  $204,892  $193,641  $150,865 
Income from equity affiliates and other income  8,047    6,813   5,226   4,559   4,435 
     
Total Revenues and Other Income
  273,005    220,904   210,118   198,200   155,300 
Total Costs and Other Deductions
  230,048    188,737   178,142   173,003   134,749 
     
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
  42,957    32,167   31,976   25,197   20,551 
Income Tax Expense
  19,026    13,479   14,838   11,098   7,517 
     
Income From Continuing Operations
  23,931    18,688   17,138   14,099   13,034 
Income From Discontinued Operations
               294 
     
Net Income
 $23,931   $18,688  $17,138  $14,099  $13,328 
     
Per Share of Common Stock3
                     
Income From Continuing Operations
                     
– Basic $11.74   $8.83  $7.84  $6.58  $6.16 
– Diluted $11.67   $8.77  $7.80  $6.54  $6.14 
Income From Discontinued Operations
                     
– Basic $   $  $  $  $0.14 
– Diluted $   $  $  $  $0.14 
Net Income2
                     
– Basic $11.74   $8.83  $7.84  $6.58  $6.30 
– Diluted $11.67   $8.77  $7.80  $6.54  $6.28 
     
Cash Dividends Per Share
 $2.53   $2.26  $2.01  $1.75  $1.53 
     
Balance Sheet Data (at December 31)
                     
Current assets $36,470   $39,377  $36,304  $34,336  $28,503 
Noncurrent assets  124,695    109,409   96,324   91,497   64,705 
     
Total Assets
  161,165    148,786   132,628   125,833   93,208 
     
Short-term debt  2,818    1,162   2,159   739   816 
Other current liabilities  29,205    32,636   26,250   24,272   17,979 
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations  6,083    6,070   7,679   12,131   10,456 
Other noncurrent liabilities  36,411    31,830   27,605   26,015   18,727 
     
Total Liabilities
  74,517    71,698   63,693   63,157   47,978 
     
Stockholders’ Equity
 $86,648   $77,088  $68,935  $62,676  $45,230 
     
1  Includes excise, value-added and similar taxes:
 $9,846   $10,121  $9,551  $8,719  $7,968 
2  Includes amounts in revenues for buy/sell contracts; associated costs are in “Total Costs and Other Deductions.” Refer also to Note 14, on page FS-43.
 $   $  $6,725  $23,822  $18,650 
3  Per-share amounts in all periods reflect a two-for-one stock split effected as a 100 percent stock dividend in September 2004.

FS-61


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

FS-62


Five-Year Financial Summary
Unaudited

                      
Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 2009   2008  2007  2006  2005 
    
Statement of Income Data
                     
Revenues and Other Income
                     
Total sales and other operating revenues1,2
 $167,402   $264,958  $214,091  $204,892  $193,641 
Income from equity affiliates and other income  4,234    8,047   6,813   5,226   4,559 
    
Total Revenues and Other Income
  171,636    273,005   220,904   210,118   198,200 
Total Costs and Other Deductions
  153,108    229,948   188,630   178,072   172,907 
    
Income Before Income Tax Expense
  18,528    43,057   32,274   32,046   25,293 
Income Tax Expense
  7,965    19,026   13,479   14,838   11,098 
    
Net Income
  10,563    24,031   18,795   17,208   14,195 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests  80    100   107   70   96 
    
Net Income Attributable to Chevron Corporation
 $10,483   $23,931  $18,688  $17,138  $14,099 
    
Per Share of Common Stock
                     
Net Income Attributable to Chevron2
                     
– Basic $5.26   $11.74  $8.83  $7.84  $6.58 
– Diluted $5.24   $11.67  $8.77  $7.80  $6.54 
    
Cash Dividends Per Share
 $2.66   $2.53  $2.26  $2.01  $1.75 
    
Balance Sheet Data (at December 31)
                     
Current assets $37,216   $36,470  $39,377  $36,304  $34,336 
Noncurrent assets  127,405    124,695   109,409   96,324   91,497 
    
Total Assets
  164,621    161,165   148,786   132,628   125,833 
    
Short-term debt  384    2,818   1,162   2,159   739 
Other current liabilities  25,827    29,205   32,636   26,250   24,272 
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations  10,130    6,083   6,070   7,679   12,131 
Other noncurrent liabilities  35,719    35,942   31,626   27,396   25,815 
    
Total Liabilities
  72,060    74,048   71,494   63,484   62,957 
    
Total Chevron Corporation Stockholders’ Equity
 $91,914   $86,648  $77,088  $68,935  $62,676 
Noncontrolling interests  647    469   204   209   200 
    
Total Equity
 $92,561   $87,117  $77,292  $69,144  $62,876 
    
    
1 Includes excise, value-added and similar taxes:
  $    8,109    $   9,846   $ 10,121   $   9,551   $    8,719 
2 Includes amounts in revenues for buy/sell contracts; associated costs are in
                     
“Total Costs and Other Deductions.”  $               $             $             $   6,725   $  23,822 

FS-63


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities
Unaudited

In accordance with FASB and SEC disclosure and reporting requirements for oil and gas producing activities, this section provides supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and producing activities of the company in seven separate tables. Tables I through IV provide historical cost information pertaining to costs incurred in exploration, property acquisitions and development; capitalized costs; and results
of operations. Tables V through VII present information on the company’s estimated net proved-reserve quantities, standardized measure of estimated discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves, and changes in estimated discounted future net cash flows. The Africa geographic area includes activities principally in Angola, Chad, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo and Democratic Republic



Table I - Costs Incurred in Exploration, Property Acquisitions and Development1
                             
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2009
                            
Exploration                            
Wells $361  $140  $45  $429  $975  $  $ 
Geological and geophysical  62   114   49   103   328       
Rentals and other  153   92   60   316   621       
 
Total exploration  576   346   154   848   1,924       
 
Property acquisitions2
                            
Proved  3            3       
Unproved  29            29       
 
Total property acquisitions  32            32       
 
Development3
  3,338   3,426   2,698   2,365   11,827   265   69 
 
Total Costs Incurred4
 $3,946  $3,772  $2,852  $3,213  $13,783  $265  $69 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20085
                            
Exploration                            
Wells $519  $197  $85  $314  $1,115  $  $ 
Geological and geophysical  66   90   42   131   329       
Rentals and other  143   60   70   212   485       
 
Total exploration  728   347   197   657   1,929       
 
Property acquisitions2
                            
Proved  88      169      257       
Unproved  579      280      859       
 
Total property acquisitions  667      449      1,116       
 
Development3
  4,348   3,723   4,697   2,419   15,187   643   120 
 
Total Costs Incurred
 $5,743  $4,070  $5,343  $3,076  $18,232  $643  $120 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20075
                            
Exploration                            
Wells $452  $202  $62  $292  $1,008  $  $7 
Geological and geophysical  73   136   24   133   366       
Rentals and other  133   70   101   148   452       
 
Total exploration  658   408   187   573   1,826      7 
 
Property acquisitions2
                            
Proved  243   5   92   (2)  338       
Unproved  113   8   35   24   180       
 
Total property acquisitions  356   13   127   22   518       
 
Development3
  5,210   4,176   2,190   1,831   13,407   832   64 
 
Total Costs Incurred
 $6,224  $4,597  $2,504  $2,426  $15,751  $832  $71 
 
1Includes costs incurred whether capitalized or expensed. Excludes general support equipment expenditures. Includes capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations. See Note 23, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” on page FS-60.
 

In accordance with FAS 69,Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities, this section provides supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and producing activities of the company in seven separate tables. Tables I through IV provide historical cost information pertaining to costs incurred in exploration, property acquisitions and development; capitalized costs; and results of operations. Tables V

through VII present information on the company’s estimated net proved reserve quantities, standardized measure of estimated discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves, and changes in estimated discounted future net cash flows. The Africa geographic area includes activities principally in Nigeria, Angola, Chad, Republic of the Congo and Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Asia-Pacific



Table I – Costs Incurred in Exploration, Property Acquisitions and Development1

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2008
                                                
Exploration                                                
Wells $  $477  $42  $519  $197  $312  $20  $67  $596  $1,115  $  $ 
Geological and geophysical     65   1   66   90   56   11   106   263   329       
Rentals and other     140   3   143   60   148   37   97   342   485       
 
Total exploration     682   46   728   347   516   68   270   1,201   1,929       
 
Property acquisitions2
                                                
Proved  (1)  2   87   88      169         169   257       
Unproved  1   576   2   579      280         280   859       
 
Total property acquisitions     578   89   667      449         449   1,116       
 
Development3
  928   1,923   1,497   4,348   3,723   4,484   753   1,879   10,839   15,187   643   120 
 
Total Costs Incurred
 $928  $3,183  $  1,632  $  5,743  $  4,070  $  5,449  $821  $  2,149  $  12,489  $  18,232  $643  $120 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2007
                                                
Exploration                                                
Wells $4  $430  $18  $452  $202  $156  $3  $195  $556  $1,008  $  $7 
Geological and geophysical     59   14   73   136   48   11   98   293   366       
Rentals and other     128   5   133   70   120   50   79   319   452       
 
Total exploration  4   617   37   658   408   324   64   372   1,168   1,826      7 
 
Property acquisitions2
                                                
Proved  10   220   13   243   5   92      (2)  95   338       
Unproved  35   75   3   113   8   35      24   67   180       
 
Total property acquisitions  45   295   16   356   13   127      22   162   518       
 
Development3
  1,198   2,237   1,775   5,210   4,176   1,897   620   1,504   8,197   13,407   832   64 
 
Total Costs Incurred
 $1,247  $3,149  $1,828  $6,224  $4,597  $2,348  $684  $1,898  $9,527  $15,751  $832  $71 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2006
                                                
Exploration                                                
Wells $  $493  $22  $515  $151  $121  $20  $246  $538  $1,053  $25  $ 
Geological and geophysical     96   8   104   180   53   12   92   337   441       
Rentals and other     116   16   132   48   140   58   50   296   428       
 
Total exploration     705   46   751   379   314   90   388   1,171   1,922   25    
 
Property acquisitions2
                                                
Proved  6   152      158   1   10      15   26   184      581 
Unproved  1   47   10   58      1      135   136   194       
 
Total property acquisitions  7   199   10   216   1   11      150   162   378      581 
 
Development3
  686   1,632   868   3,186   2,890   1,788   460   1,019   6,157   9,343   671   25 
 
Total Costs Incurred
 $693  $2,536  $924  $4,153  $3,270  $2,113  $550  $1,557  $7,490  $11,643  $696  $606 
 
1Includes costs incurred whether capitalized or expensed. Excludes general support equipment expenditures. Includes capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations. See Note 24, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” beginning on page FS-58.
2Includes wells, equipment and facilities associated with proved reserves. Does not include properties acquired in nonmonetary transactions.
3Includes $224, $99 and $160 costs incurred prior to assignment of proved reserves in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
2Includes wells, equipment and facilities associated with proved reserves. Does not include properties acquired in nonmonetary transactions.
3Includes $121, $224 and $99 costs incurred prior to assignment of proved reserves in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Also includes $104 and $12 in 2009 for consolidated Other and affiliated Other, respectively.

FS-62

4Includes cost incurred for oil sands in consolidated Other and heavy oil in affiliated Other as a result of the update to Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic 932).
5Geographic presentation conformed to 2009 consistent with the presentation of the oil and gas reserve tables.

FS-64





Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities
Table II Capitalized Costs Related to Oil and
               Gas Producing Activities

of the Congo. The Asia geographic area includes activities principally in Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Myanmar, the Partitioned Zone between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, the Philippines, and Thailand. The Other geographic regions include activities in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, the United
Kingdom and other countries. Amounts for TCO represent Chevron’s 50 percent equity share of Tengizchevroil, an exploration and production partnership in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The affiliated companies Other amounts are composed of the company’s equity interests in Venezuela and Angola. Refer to Note 12, beginning on page FS-43, for a discussion of the company’s major equity affiliates.


geographic area includes activities principally in Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, China, Kazakhstan, Myanmar, the Partitioned Neutral Zone between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, the Philippines, and Thailand. The international “Other” geographic category includes activities in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, the United Kingdom, and

other countries. Amounts for TCO represent Chevron’s 50 percent equity share of Tengizchevroil, an exploration and production partnership in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The affiliated companies “Other” amounts are composed of the company’s equity interests in Venezuela, Angola and Russia. Refer to Note 12 beginning on page FS-41 for a discussion of the company’s major equity affiliates.



Table II - Capitalized Costs Related to Oil and Gas Producing Activities

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
     
At Dec. 31, 2008
                                                
Unproved properties $810  $1,357  $328  $2,495  $294  $2,788  $651  $912  $4,645  $7,140  $113  $ 
Proved properties and related producing assets  12,048   19,318   14,914   46,280   17,495   21,726   8,117   13,041   60,379   106,659   5,991   841 
Support equipment  239   226   252   717   967   266   1,150   475   2,858   3,575   888    
Deferred exploratory wells     602      602   499   495   107   415   1,516   2,118       
Other uncompleted projects  405   3,812   58   4,275   4,226   2,490   875   1,739   9,330   13,605   501   81 
 
Gross Cap. Costs
  13,502   25,315   15,552   54,369   23,481   27,765   10,900   16,582   78,728   133,097   7,493   922 
 
Unproved properties valuation  744   80   21   845   202   223   64   439   928   1,773   29    
Proved producing properties – Depreciation and depletion  7,802   14,546   8,432   30,780   6,602   8,692   6,214   8,360   29,868   60,648   831   212 
Support equipment depreciation  145   99   138   382   523   128   611   307   1,569   1,951   307    
 
Accumulated provisions  8,691   14,725   8,591   32,007   7,327   9,043   6,889   9,106   32,365   64,372   1,167   212 
 
Net Capitalized Costs
 $4,811  $10,590  $6,961  $22,362  $16,154  $18,722  $4,011  $7,476  $46,363  $68,725  $6,326  $710 
 
At Dec. 31, 2007
                                                
Unproved properties $805  $892  $353  $2,050  $314  $2,639  $630  $1,015  $4,598  $6,648  $112  $ 
Proved properties and related producing assets  11,260   19,110   13,718   44,088   11,894   17,321   7,705   11,360   48,280   92,368   4,247   858 
Support equipment  201   206   230   637   850   284   1,123   439   2,696   3,333   758    
Deferred exploratory wells     406   7   413   368   293   148   438   1,247   1,660       
Other uncompleted projects  308   3,128   573   4,009   6,430   2,049   593   1,421   10,493   14,502   1,633   55 
 
Gross Cap. Costs
  12,574   23,742   14,881   51,197   19,856   22,586   10,199   14,673   67,314   118,511   6,750   913 
 
Unproved properties valuation  741   57   35   833   201   221   39   427   888   1,721   23    
Proved producing properties – Depreciation and depletion  7,383   15,074   7,640   30,097   5,427   6,912   5,592   7,062   24,993   55,090   644   167 
Support equipment depreciation  133   92   124   349   464   144   571   261   1,440   1,789   267    
 
Accumulated provisions  8,257   15,223   7,799   31,279   6,092   7,277   6,202   7,750   27,321   58,600   934   167 
 
Net Capitalized Costs
 $4,317  $8,519  $7,082  $19,918  $13,764  $15,309  $3,997  $6,923  $39,993  $59,911  $5,816  $746 
 

FS-63


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities


                             
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other 
     
At Dec. 31, 2009
                            
Unproved properties $2,320  $321  $3,355  $963  $6,959  $113  $ 
Proved properties and related producing assets  51,582   20,967   29,637   17,267   119,453   6,404   1,759 
Support equipment  810   1,012   1,383   648   3,853   947    
Deferred exploratory wells  762   603   209   861   2,435       
Other uncompleted projects  2,384   3,960   2,936   5,572   14,852   284   58 
 
Gross Capitalized Costs
  57,858   26,863   37,520   25,311   147,552   7,748   1,817 
 
Unproved properties valuation  915   163   170   390   1,638   32    
Proved producing properties –                            
Depreciation and depletion  34,574   8,823   15,783   11,243   70,423   1,150   282 
Support equipment depreciation  424   526   773   357   2,080   356    
 
Accumulated provisions  35,913   9,512   16,726   11,990   74,141   1,538   282 
 
Net Capitalized Costs1
 $21,945  $17,351  $20,794  $13,321  $73,411  $6,210  $1,535 
 
At Dec. 31, 20082,3
                            
Unproved properties $2,495  $294  $3,300  $1,051  $7,140  $113  $ 
Proved properties and related producing assets  46,280   17,495   27,607   15,277   106,659   5,991   837 
Support equipment  717   967   1,321   570   3,575   888    
Deferred exploratory wells  602   499   198   819   2,118       
Other uncompleted projects  4,275   4,226   2,461   2,643   13,605   501   101 
 
Gross Capitalized Costs
  54,369   23,481   34,887   20,360   133,097   7,493   938 
 
Unproved properties valuation  845   202   150   576   1,773   29    
Proved producing properties –                            
Depreciation and depletion  30,780   6,602   13,617   9,649   60,648   831   163 
Support equipment depreciation  382   523   690   356   1,951   307    
 
Accumulated provisions  32,007   7,327   14,457   10,581   64,372   1,167   163 
 
Net Capitalized Costs
 $22,362  $16,154  $20,430  $9,779  $68,725  $6,326  $775 
 
1Includes net capitalized cost for oil sands in consolidated Other and heavy oil in affiliated Other as a result of the update to Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic 932).
2Geographic presentation conformed to 2009 consistent with the presentation of the oil and gas reserve tables.
3Amounts for Affiliated Companies — Other conformed to agreements entered in 2007 and 2008 for Venezuelan affiliates.

FS-65


Table IICapitalized Costs Related to Oil and
               Gas Producing Activities - Continued
                             
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other 
     
At Dec. 31, 20072,3
                            
Unproved properties $2,050  $314  $3,125  $1,159  $6,648  $112  $ 
Proved properties and related producing assets  44,088   11,894   23,100   13,286   92,368   4,247   1,127 
Support equipment  637   850   1,355   491   3,333   758    
Deferred exploratory wells  413   368   214   665   1,660       
Other uncompleted projects  4,009   6,430   2,039   2,024   14,502   1,633   55 
 
Gross Capitalized Costs
  51,197   19,856   29,833   17,625   118,511   6,750   1,182 
 
Unproved properties valuation  833   201   120   567   1,721   23    
Proved producing properties –                            
Depreciation and depletion  30,097   5,427   11,329   8,237   55,090   644   183 
Support equipment depreciation  349   464   678   298   1,789   267    
 
Accumulated provisions  31,279   6,092   12,127   9,102   58,600   934   183 
 
Net Capitalized Costs
 $19,918  $13,764  $17,706  $8,523  $59,911  $5,816  $999 
 
2Geographic presentation conformed to 2009 consistent with the presentation of the oil and gas reserve tables.
 
3Amounts for Affiliated Companies — Other conformed to agreements entered in 2007 and 2008 for Venezuelan affiliates.

FS-66

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
     
At Dec. 31, 2006
                                                
Unproved properties $770  $1,007  $370  $2,147  $342  $2,373  $707  $1,082  $4,504  $6,651  $112  $ 
Proved properties and related producing assets  9,960   18,464   12,284   40,708   9,943   15,486   7,110   10,461   43,000   83,708   2,701   1,096 
Support equipment  189   212   226   627   745   240   1,093   364   2,442   3,069   611    
Deferred exploratory wells     343   7   350   231   217   149   292   889   1,239       
Other uncompleted projects  370   2,188      2,558   4,299   1,546   493   917   7,255   9,813   2,493   40 
 
Gross Cap. Costs
  11,289   22,214   12,887   46,390   15,560   19,862   9,552   13,116   58,090   104,480   5,917   1,136 
 
Unproved properties valuation  738   52   29   819   189   74   14   337   614   1,433   22    
Proved producing properties – Depreciation and depletion  7,082   14,468   6,880   28,430   4,794   5,273   4,971   6,087   21,125   49,555   541   109 
Support equipment depreciation  125   111   130   366   400   102   522   238   1,262   1,628   242    
 
Accumulated provisions  7,945   14,631   7,039   29,615   5,383   5,449   5,507   6,662   23,001   52,616   805   109 
 
Net Capitalized Costs
 $3,344  $7,583  $5,848  $16,775  $10,177  $14,413  $4,045  $6,454  $35,089  $51,864  $5,112  $1,027 
 

FS-64





Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities
Table IIIResults of Operations for Oil and
                Gas Producing Activities1

     The company’s results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007 are shown in the following table. Net income from exploration and production activities as reported on page FS-41 reflects income taxes computed on an effective rate basis.
Income taxes in Table III are based on statutory tax rates, reflecting allowable deductions and tax credits. Interest income and expense are excluded from the results reported in Table III and from the net income amounts on page FS-41.


                             
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20092
                            
Revenues from net production                            
Sales $2,278  $1,767  $5,648  $3,173  $12,866  $4,043  $938 
Transfers  9,133   7,304   4,926   3,866   25,229       
 
Total  11,411   9,071   10,574   7,039   38,095   4,043   938 
Production expenses excluding taxes  (3,281)  (1,345)  (2,208)  (1,390)  (8,224)  (363)  (240)
Taxes other than on income  (367)  (132)  (53)  (284)  (836)  (50)  (96)
Proved producing properties:                            
Depreciation and depletion  (3,493)  (2,175)  (2,279)  (1,598)  (9,545)  (381)  (88)
Accretion expense3
  (194)  (66)  (70)  (79)  (409)  (7)  (3)
Exploration expenses  (451)  (236)  (113)  (542)  (1,342)      
Unproved properties valuation  (228)  (11)  (44)  (28)  (311)      
Other income (expense)4
  156   98   (327)  (340)  (413)  (131)  9 
 
Results before income taxes  3,553   5,204   5,480   2,778   17,015   3,111   520 
Income tax expense  (1,258)  (3,214)  (2,921)  (1,360)  (8,753)  (935)  (258)
 
Results of Producing Operations
 $2,295  $1,990  $2,559  $1,418  $8,262  $2,176  $262 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20085
                            
Revenues from net production                            
Sales $4,882  $2,578  $7,969  $4,534  $19,963  $4,971  $1,599 
Transfers  12,868   8,373   7,179   5,150   33,570       
 
Total  17,750   10,951   15,148   9,684   53,533   4,971   1,599 
Production expenses excluding taxes  (3,822)  (1,228)  (2,096)  (969)  (8,115)  (376)  (125)
Taxes other than on income  (716)  (163)  (263)  (370)  (1,512)  (41)  (278)
Proved producing properties:                            
Depreciation and depletion  (2,286)  (1,176)  (2,299)  (1,452)  (7,213)  (237)  (77)
Accretion expense3
  (242)  (60)  (48)  (59)  (409)  (2)  (1)
Exploration expenses  (370)  (223)  (178)  (398)  (1,169)      
Unproved properties valuation  (114)  (13)  (36)  (8)  (171)      
Other income (expense)4
  707   (350)  198   318   873   184   105 
 
Results before income taxes  10,907   7,738   10,426   6,746   35,817   4,499   1,223 
Income tax expense  (3,856)  (6,051)  (5,697)  (3,441)  (19,045)  (1,357)  (612)
 
Results of Producing Operations
 $7,051  $1,687  $4,729  $3,305  $16,772  $3,142  $611 
 
1The value of owned production consumed in operations as fuel has been eliminated from revenues and production expenses, and the related volumes have been deducted from net production in calculating the unit average sales price and production cost. This has no effect on the results of producing operations.
 
2Includes results of producing operations for oil sands in consolidated Other and heavy oil in affiliated Other as a result of the update to Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic 932).
3Represents accretion of ARO liability. Refer to Note 23, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” on page FS-60.
4Includes foreign currency gains and losses, gains and losses on property dispositions, and income from operating and technical service agreements.
5Geographic presentation conformed to 2009 consistent with the presentation of the oil and gas reserve tables.

FS-67


     The company’s results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006 are shown in the following table. Net income from exploration and production activities as reported on page FS-39 reflects income taxes computed on an effective rate basis.

In accordance with FAS 69, income taxes in Table III are based on statutory tax rates, reflecting allowable deductions and tax credits. Interest income and expense are excluded from the results reported in Table III and from the net income amounts on page FS-39.



                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2008
                                                
Revenues from net production                                                
Sales $226  $1,543  $3,113  $4,882  $2,578  $7,030  $1,447  $4,026  $15,081  $19,963  $4,971  $1,599 
Transfers  6,405   2,839   3,624   12,868   8,373   5,703   2,975   3,651   20,702   33,570       
 
Total  6,631   4,382   6,737   17,750   10,951   12,733   4,422   7,677   35,783   53,533   4,971   1,599 
Production expenses excluding taxes  (1,385)  (914)  (1,523)  (3,822)  (1,228)  (1,182)  (1,009)  (874)  (4,293)  (8,115)  (376)  (125)
Taxes other than on income  (107)  (55)  (554)  (716)  (163)  (585)  (1)  (47)  (796)  (1,512)  (41)  (278)
Proved producing properties: Depreciation and depletion  (415)  (926)  (945)  (2,286)  (1,176)  (1,804)  (617)  (1,330)  (4,927)  (7,213)  (237)  (77)
Accretion expense2
  (29)  (119)  (94)  (242)  (60)  (31)  (22)  (54)  (167)  (409)  (2)  (1)
Exploration expenses     (330)  (40)  (370)  (223)  (243)  (83)  (250)  (799)  (1,169)      
Unproved properties valuation  (3)  (91)  (20)  (114)  (13)  (12)  (25)  (7)  (57)  (171)      
Other income (expense)3
  (20)  (383)  1,110   707   (350)  298   (64)  282  166  873  184   105 
 
Results before income taxes  4,672   1,564   4,671   10,907   7,738   9,174   2,601   5,397   24,910   35,817   4,499   1,223 
Income tax expense  (1,652)  (553)  (1,651)  (3,856)  (6,051)  (4,865)  (1,257)  (3,016)  (15,189)  (19,045)  (1,357)  (612)
 
Results of ProducingOperations
 $3,020  $1,011  $3,020  $7,051  $1,687  $4,309  $1,344  $2,381  $9,721  $16,772  $3,142  $611 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2007
                                                
Revenues from net production                                                
Sales $202  $1,555  $2,476  $4,233  $1,810  $6,192  $1,045  $3,012  $12,059  $16,292  $3,327  $1,290 
Transfers  4,671   2,630   2,707   10,008   6,778   4,440   2,590   2,744   16,552   26,560       
 
Total  4,873   4,185   5,183   14,241   8,588   10,632   3,635   5,756   28,611   42,852   3,327   1,290 
Production expenses4 excluding taxes
  (1,063)  (936)  (1,400)  (3,399)  (892)  (953)  (892)  (828)  (3,565)  (6,964)  (248)  (92)
Taxes other than on income  (91)  (53)  (378)  (522)  (49)  (292)  (2)  (58)  (401)  (923)  (31)  (163)
Proved producing properties: Depreciation and depletion  (300)  (1,143)  (833)  (2,276)  (646)  (1,668)  (623)  (980)  (3,917)  (6,193)  (127)  (94)
Accretion expense2
  (92)  1   (167)  (258)  (33)  (36)  (21)  (27)  (117)  (375)  (1)  (2)
Exploration expenses     (486)  (25)  (511)  (267)  (225)  (61)  (259)  (812)  (1,323)      
Unproved properties valuation  (3)  (102)  (27)  (132)  (12)  (150)  (30)  (120)  (312)  (444)      
Other income (expense)3
  3   2   31   36   (447)  (302)  (197)  33  (913)  (877)  18   7 
 
Results before income taxes  3,327   1,468   2,384   7,179   6,242   7,006   1,809   3,517   18,574   25,753   2,938   946 
Income tax expense  (1,204)  (531)  (864)  (2,599)  (4,907)  (3,456)  (841)  (1,830)  (11,034)  (13,633)  (887)  (462)
 
Results of ProducingOperations
 $2,123  $937  $1,520  $4,580  $1,335  $3,550  $968  $1,687  $7,540  $12,120  $2,051  $484 
 
Table III Results of Operations for Oil and
                Gas Producing Activities1
- Continued
                             
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20072
                            
Revenues from net production                            
Sales $4,233  $1,810  $6,836  $3,413  $16,292  $3,327  $1,290 
Transfers  10,008   6,778   5,923   3,851   26,560       
 
Total  14,241   8,588   12,759   7,264   42,852   3,327   1,290 
Production expenses excluding taxes3
  (3,399)  (892)  (1,753)  (920)  (6,964)  (248)  (92)
Taxes other than on income  (522)  (49)  (79)  (273)  (923)  (31)  (163)
Proved producing properties:                           ��
Depreciation and depletion  (2,276)  (646)  (2,201)  (1,070)  (6,193)  (127)  (94)
Accretion expense4
  (258)  (33)  (49)  (35)  (375)  (1)  (2)
Exploration expenses  (511)  (267)  (171)  (374)  (1,323)      
Unproved properties valuation  (132)  (12)  (41)  (259)  (444)      
Other income (expense)5
  36   (447)  (351)  (115)  (877)  18   7 
 
Results before income taxes  7,179   6,242   8,114   4,218   25,753   2,938   946 
 
Income tax expense  (2,599)  (4,907)  (4,135)  (1,992)  (13,633)  (887)  (462)
 
Results of Producing Operations
 $4,580  $1,335  $3,979  $2,226  $12,120  $2,051  $484 
 
1The value of owned production consumed in operations as fuel has been eliminated from revenues and production expenses, and the related volumes have been deducted from net production in calculating the unit average sales price and production cost. This has no effect on the results of producing operations.
2Represents accretion of ARO liability. Refer to Note 24, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” beginning on page FS-58.
3 
2Geographic presentation conformed to 2009 consistent with the presentation of the oil and gas reserve tables.
3Includes $10 costs incurred prior to assignment of proved reserves in 2007.
4Represents accretion of ARO liability. Refer to Note 23, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” on page FS-60.
5Includes foreign currency gains and losses, gains and losses on property dispositions, and income from operating and technical service agreements.
4Includes $10 costs incurred prior to assignment of proved reserves in 2007.

FS-68

FS-65


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Table IIIIV Results of Operations for Oil and
Gas Producing Activities1 - ContinuedUnit Prices and Costs1,2

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2006
                                                
Revenues from net production                                                
Sales $308  $1,845  $2,976  $5,129  $2,377  $4,938  $1,001  $2,814  $11,130  $16,259  $2,861  $598 
Transfers  4,072   2,317   2,046   8,435   5,264   4,084   2,211   2,848   14,407   22,842       
 
Total  4,380   4,162   5,022   13,564   7,641   9,022   3,212   5,662   25,537   39,101   2,861   598 
Production expenses excluding taxes  (889)  (765)  (1,057)  (2,711)  (640)  (740)  (728)  (664)  (2,772)  (5,483)  (202)  (42)
Taxes other than on income  (84)  (57)  (442)  (583)  (57)  (231)  (1)  (60)  (349)  (932)  (28)  (6)
Proved producing properties:                                                
Depreciation and depletion  (275)  (1,096)  (763)  (2,134)  (579)  (1,475)  (666)  (703)  (3,423)  (5,557)  (114)  (33)
Accretion expense2
  (11)  (80)  (39)  (130)  (26)  (30)  (23)  (49)  (128)  (258)  (1)   
Exploration expenses     (407)  (24)  (431)  (296)  (209)  (110)  (318)  (933)  (1,364)  (25)   
Unproved properties valuation  (3)  (73)  (8)  (84)  (28)  (15)  (14)  (27)  (84)  (168)      
Other income (expense)3
  1   (732)  254   (477)  (435)  (475)  50   385   (475)  (952)  8   (50)
 
Results before income taxes  3,119   952   2,943   7,014   5,580   5,847   1,720   4,226   17,373   24,387   2,499   467 
Income tax expense  (1,169)  (357)  (1,103)  (2,629)  (4,740)  (3,224)  (793)  (2,151)  (10,908)  (13,537)  (750)  (174)
 
Results of Producing Operations
 $1,950  $595  $1,840  $4,385  $840  $2,623  $927  $2,075  $6,465  $10,850  $1,749  $293 
 
                             
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
  U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2009
                            
Average sales prices                            
Liquids, per barrel $54.36  $60.35  $54.76  $59.83  $56.92  $47.33  $50.18 
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet  3.73   0.20   4.07   4.10   3.94   1.54   1.85 
Average production costs, per barrel3
  12.71   8.85   8.82   8.63   9.97   3.71   12.42 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20084
                            
Average sales prices                            
Liquids, per barrel $88.43  $91.71  $83.67  $85.95  $87.44  $79.11  $69.65 
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet  7.90      4.55   6.36   6.02   1.56   3.98 
Average production costs, per barrel  15.85   10.00   8.12   6.42   10.49   5.24   5.32 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 20074
                            
Average sales prices                            
Liquids, per barrel $63.16  $69.90  $62.52  $64.48  $64.71  $62.47  $51.98 
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet  6.12      3.98   4.08   4.79   0.89   0.44 
Average production costs, per barrel  12.72   7.26   6.52   6.01   8.58   3.98   3.56 
 
1The value of owned production consumed in operations as fuel has been eliminated from revenues and production expenses, and the related volumes have been deducted from net production in calculating the unit average sales price and production cost. This has no effect on the results of producing operations.
 
2Represents accretion of ARO liability. Refer to Note 24, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” beginning on page FS-58.
3Includes foreign currency gains and losses, gains and losses on property dispositions, and income from operating and technical service agreements.

FS-66





Table IVResults of Operations for Oil and
                Gas Producing Activities - Unit Prices and Costs1,2
                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
  Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
     
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2008
                                                
Average sales prices Liquids, per barrel $87.43  $95.62  $85.30  $88.43  $91.71  $86.38  $79.14  $85.14  $86.99  $87.44  $79.11  $69.65 
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet  7.19   9.17   7.43   7.90      4.56   8.25   6.00   5.14   6.02   1.56   3.98 
Average production costs, per barrel  17.67   16.22   14.31   15.85   10.00   5.14   16.46   7.36   8.06   10.49   5.24   5.32 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2007
                                                
Average sales prices Liquids, per barrel $62.61  $65.07  $62.35  $63.16  $69.90  $64.20  $61.05  $62.97  $65.40  $64.71  $62.47  $51.98 
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet  5.77   7.01   5.65   6.12      3.60   7.61   4.13   4.02   4.79   0.89   0.44 
Average production costs, per barrel  13.23   12.32   12.62   12.72   7.26   3.96   14.28   6.96   6.54   8.58   3.98   3.56 
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2006
                                                
Average sales prices Liquids, per barrel $55.20  $60.35  $55.80  $56.66  $61.53  $57.05  $52.23  $57.31  $57.92  $57.53  $56.80  $37.26 
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet  6.08   7.20   5.73   6.29   0.06   3.44   7.12   4.03   3.88   4.85   0.77   0.36 
Average production costs, per barrel  10.94   9.59   9.26   9.85   5.13   3.36   11.44   5.23   5.17   6.76   3.31   2.51 
 
1The value of owned production consumed in operations as fuel has been eliminated from revenues and production expenses, and the related volumes have been deducted from net production in calculating the unit average sales price and production cost. This has no effect on the results of producing operations.
2Natural gas converted to oil-equivalent gas (OEG) barrels at a rate of 6 MCF = 1 OEG barrel.

Table V – Reserve Quantity Information

Reserves Governance  The company has adopted a comprehensive reserves and resource classification system modeled after a system developed and approved by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the World Petroleum Congress and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. The system classifies recoverable hydrocarbons into six categories based on their status at the time of reporting – three deemed commercial and three noncommercial. Within the commercial classification are proved reserves and two categories of unproved: probable and possible. The noncommercial categories are also referred to as contingent resources. For reserves estimates to be classified as proved, they must meet all SEC and company standards.

     Proved reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.
3Includes oil sands in consolidated Other and heavy oil in affiliated Other as a result of the update to Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic 932).
4Geographic presentation conformed to 2009 consistent with the presentation of the oil and gas reserve tables.

Table VReserve Quantity Information
Reserves Governance The company has adopted a comprehensive reserves and resource classification system modeled after a system developed and approved by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the World Petroleum Congress and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. The system classifies recoverable hydrocarbons into six categories based on their status at the time of reporting – three deemed commercial and three noncommercial. Within the commercial classification are proved reserves and two categories of unproved: probable and possible. The noncommercial categories are also referred to as contingent resources. For reserves estimates to be classified as proved, they must meet all SEC and company standards.
     Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities that geoscience and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be economically producible in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations. Net proved reserves exclude royalties and interests owned by others and reflect contractual arrangements and royalty obligations in effect at the time of the estimate.
     Proved reserves are classified as either developed or undeveloped. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
     Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, estimates of reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available.
     Proved reserves are estimated by company asset teams composed of earth scientists and engineers. As part of the internal control process related to reserves estimation, the com-
pany maintains a Reserves Advisory Committee (RAC) that is chaired by the corporate reserves manager, who is a member of a corporate department that reports directly to the vice chairman responsible for the company’s worldwide exploration and production activities. The corporate reserves manager has more than 30 years experience working in the oil and gas industry and a Master’s of Science in Petroleum Engineering. All RAC members are knowledgeable in SEC guidelines for proved reserves classification. The RAC manages its activities through two operating company-level reserves managers. These two reserves managers are not members of the RAC so as to preserve the corporate-level independence.
     The RAC has the following primary responsibilities: provide independent reviews of the business units’ recommended reserve changes; confirm that proved reserves are recognized in accordance with SEC guidelines; determine that reserve volumes are calculated using consistent and appropriate standards, procedures and technology; and maintain theCorporate Reserves Manual,which provides standardized procedures used corporatewide for classifying and reporting hydrocarbon reserves.
     During the year, the RAC is represented in meetings with each of the company’s upstream business units to review and discuss reserve changes recommended by the various asset teams. Major changes are also reviewed with the company’s Strategy and Planning Committee and the Executive Committee, whose members include the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The company’s annual reserve activity is also reviewed with the Board of Directors. If major changes to reserves were to occur between the annual reviews, those matters would also be discussed with the Board.


FS-69

     Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, estimates of reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available.

     Proved reserves are estimated by company asset teams composed of earth scientists and engineers. As part of the internal control process related to reserves estimation, the company maintains a Reserves Advisory Committee (RAC) that is chaired by the corporate reserves manager, who is a member of a corporate department that reports directly to the executive vice president responsible for the company’s worldwide exploration and production activities. All of the RAC members are knowledgeable in SEC guidelines for proved reserves classification. The RAC coordinates its activities through two operating company-level reserves managers. These two reserves managers are not members of the RAC so as to preserve the corporate-level independence.
     The RAC has the following primary responsibilities: provide independent reviews of the business units’ recommended reserve changes; confirm that proved reserves are recognized in accordance with SEC guidelines; determine that reserve volumes are calculated using consistent and appropriate standards, procedures and technology; and maintain theCorporate Reserves Manual,which provides standardized procedures used corporatewide for classifying and reporting hydrocarbon reserves.



FS-67


Table V Reserve Quantity Information - Continued
     RAC subteams also conduct in-depth reviews during the year of many of the fields that have the largest proved reserves quantities. These reviews include an examination of the proved-reserve records and documentation of their alignment with theCorporate Reserves Manual.
Summary of Net Oil and Gas Reserves
                             
  20091  20082  20072 
  Crude Oil          Crude Oil      Crude Oil    
Liquids and Synthetic Oil in Millions of Barrels Condensate  Synthetic  Natural  Condensate  Natural  Condensate  Natural 
Natural Gas in Billions of Cubic Feet NGLs  Oil  Gas  NGLs  Gas  NGLs  Gas 
 
Proved Developed
                            
 
Consolidated Companies                            
U.S.  1,122      2,314   1,158   2,709   1,238   3,226 
Africa  820      978   789   1,209   758   1,151 
Asia  926      5,062   1,094   4,758   722   4,344 
Other  267   190   3,051   295   3,163   368   2,978 
 
Total Consolidated
  3,135   190   11,405   3,336   11,839   3,086   11,699 
 
Affiliated Companies                            
TCO  1,256      1,830   1,369   1,999   1,273   1,762 
Other  97   56   73   263   124   263   117 
 
Total Consolidated and Affiliated Companies
  4,488   246   13,308   4,968   13,962   4,622   13,578 
 
Proved Undeveloped
                            
 
Consolidated Companies                            
U.S.  239      384   312   441   386   451 
Africa  426      2,043   596   1,847   742   1,898 
Asia  245      2,798   362   3,238   301   2,863 
Other  105   270   5,523   129   1,657   150   2,226 
 
Total Consolidated
  1,015   270   10,748   1,399   7,183   1,579   7,438 
 
Affiliated Companies                            
TCO  690      1,003   807   1,176   716   986 
Other  54   210   990   176   754   170   138 
 
Total Consolidated and Affiliated Companies
  1,759   480   12,741   2,382   9,113   2,465   8,562 
 
Total Proved Reserves
  6,247   726   26,049   7,350   23,075   7,087   22,140 
 
1Based on 12-month average price.
 
2Based on year-end prices.

Revised Oil and Gas Reporting In December 2008, the SEC issued its final rule,Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting(Release Nos. 33-8995; 34-59192; FR-78). The disclosure requirements under the final rule became effective for the company with its Form 10-K filing for the year ending December 31, 2009. The final rule changes a number of oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosure requirements under SEC Regulations S-K and S-X. Subsequently, the FASB updatedExtractive Industries — Oil and Gas(Topic 932) to align the oil and gas reserves estimation and disclosure requirements with the SEC’s final rule.
     Among the principal changes in the final rule are requirements to use a price based on a 12-month average for reserve estimation and disclosure instead of a single end-of-year price; expanding the definition of oil and gas producing activities to include nontraditional sources such as bitumen extracted from oil sands; permitting the use of new reliable technologies to establish reasonable certainty of proved reserves; allowing optional disclosure of probable and possible reserves; modifying the definition of geographic area for disclosure of reserve estimates and production; amending
disclosures of proved reserve quantities to include separate disclosures of synthetic oil and gas; expanding proved undeveloped reserves disclosures, including discussion of proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped for five years or more; and disclosure of the qualifications of the chief technical person who oversees the company’s overall reserves estimation process.
Effect of New Rules The most significant effect of the company’s adopting the new guidance was the inclusion of Canadian oil sands as synthetic oil in the consolidated companies reserves. As indicated in Table V, on page FS-72, an additional 460 million BOE were included at year-end 2009. The synthetic oil reported for affiliated companies represents volumes reclassified from heavy crude oil to synthetic oil, and does not represent additional reserves. It was impracticable to estimate the remaining impact of the new rules because of the cost and resources required to prepare detailed field-level calculations. However, the use of the 12-month average price had an upward effect on reserves related to production-sharing and variable-royalty contracts as the 12-month average price for crude oil and


FS-70


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Table VReserve Quantity Information - Continued

natural gas for 2009 was lower than the 2009 year-end spot prices applicable under the old rules. The ability to use new technologies in reserves determination did not impact reserves significantly, as most reserve additions and revisions were based on conventional technologies.
Proved Undeveloped Reserve QuantitiesAt the end of 2009, proved undeveloped oil-equivalent reserves for consolidated companies totaled 3.1 billion barrels. Approximately 58 percent of the reserves are attributed to natural gas, of which about half were located in Australia in the Other regions. Crude oil, condensate and NGLs accounted for about 33 percent of the total, with the largest concentration of these reserves in Africa, Asia and the United States. Synthetic oil accounted for the balance of the reserves and were located in Canada in the Other regions.
     Proved undeveloped reserves of equity affiliates amounted to 1.3 billion oil-equivalent barrels. At year-end, crude oil, condensate and NGLs represented 58 percent of the total reserves, with the TCO affiliate accounting for the majority of the amount. Natural gas represented 26 percent of the total, with over half of these reserves at TCO. The balance is attributed to synthetic oil in Venezuela in the Other regions.
     In 2009, worldwide proved undeveloped oil-equivalent reserves increased by 480 million barrels for consolidated companies and decreased 19 million barrels for equity affiliates. The largest increase for consolidated companies was in the Other regions, resulting primarily from initial recognition of reserves for the Gorgon Project in Australia and addition of synthetic oil reserves related to Canadian oil sands with adoption of the new definition of oil and gas activity. Proved undeveloped reserves decreased in Asia, Africa, and the United States, as a result of development drilling and other activities, which reclassified reserves to proved developed.
     Proved undeveloped reserves decreased for affiliated companies. This was primarily associated with a 146 million barrel reclassification to proved developed as a result of the TCO production capacity added with the completion of the Sour Gas Injection/Second Generation Plant Projects (SGI/SGP). The decrease at TCO was partially offset by increased proved undeveloped reserves in Venezuela and for Angola LNG due to reservoir performance and additional drilling opportunities.
     There were no material downward revisions of proved undeveloped reserves for consolidated or affiliated companies.
Investment to Convert Proved Undeveloped to Proved Developed ReservesDuring 2009, investments totaling about $6.9 billion were made by consolidated companies and equity affiliates to advance the development of proved undeveloped reserves. In the Africa region, $2.5 billion was expended on various projects, including offshore development projects in Nigeria and Angola, which advanced development drilling, and the completion of a Nigerian natural gas processing project. In the Asia region, expenditures during the year totaled $1.5 billion, which included construction on a gas processing
facility in Thailand and development drilling at a steam-flood project in Indonesia. In the United States, expenditures totaled $1.7 billion for three offshore development projects in the Gulf of Mexico and various smaller development projects. In the Other regions, development expenditures totaled $1.2 billion for a variety of projects including development activities in Australia and the United Kingdom.
     During the year, eight major development projects that were placed into service resulted in the recognition of proved developed reserves.
Proved Undeveloped Reserves for 5 Years or MoreReserves that remain proved undeveloped for five or more years are a result of several physical factors that affect optimal project development and execution, such as the complex nature of the development project in adverse and remote locations, physical limitations of infrastructure or plant capacities that dictate project timing, compression projects that are pending reservoir pressure declines, and contractual limitations that dictate production levels.
     Proved undeveloped oil-equivalent reserves for consolidated and affiliated companies totaled 4.4 billion barrels at year-end 2009. Of this total, 1.7 billion barrels corresponds to proved undeveloped
oil-equivalent reserves that have remained undeveloped for five years or more.
     Consolidated companies held approximately 700 million barrels of the proved undeveloped reserves over five years. In Africa, approximately 400 million barrels were related to deepwater projects under development. The Asia region held approximately 100 million barrels related to compression and contract restrictions. The Other regions held about 100 million barrels related to compression projects in Australia. The balance relates to capacity constraints and various projects in the United States.
     At year end, affiliated companies held about 1.0 billion barrels of proved undeveloped reserves over five years. TCO accounted for 800 million oil-equivalent barrels of reserves, which was primarily related to plant capacity limitations. The balance related to capacity limitations at a synthetic oil project in Venezuela.
     Annually, the company assesses whether any changes have occurred in facts or circumstances, such as changes to development plans, regulations or government policies, which would warrant a revision to reserve estimates. For 2009, this assessment did not result in any material changes in reserves classified as proved undeveloped. Over the past three years, the ratio of proved undeveloped reserves to total proved reserves has ranged between 35 and 39 percent. The consistent completion of major capital projects has kept the ratio in a narrow range over this time period.
Proved Reserve QuantitiesAt December 31, 2009, oil-equivalent reserves for the company’s consolidated operations were 8.3 billion barrels. (Refer to the term “Reserves” on page E-42 for the definition of oil-equivalent reserves.) Approximately 22 percent of the total reserves were located


FS-71


Table V Reserve Quantity Information - Continued

in the United States. For the company’s interests in equity affiliates, oil-equivalent reserves were 3.0 billion barrels, 80 percent of which were associated with the company’s 50 percent ownership in TCO.
     Aside from the Tengiz Field in the TCO affiliate, no single property accounted for more than 5 percent of the company’s total oil-equivalent proved reserves. About 25 other individual properties in the company’s portfolio of assets each contained between 1 percent and 5 percent of the company’s oil-equivalent proved reserves, which in the aggregate accounted for approximately
48 percent of the company’s total proved reserves. These properties were geographically dispersed, located in the United States, Canada, South America, West Africa, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Australia.
     In the United States, total oil-equivalent reserves at year-end 2009 were 1.8 billion barrels. California properties accounted for approximately 44 percent of the U.S. reserves, with most classified as heavy oil. Because of heavy oil’s high viscosity and the need to employ enhanced recovery methods, the producing operations are capital intensive in nature. Most of the company’s heavy-oil fields in California employ
a continuous steamflooding process. The Gulf of Mexico region contains about 22 percent of the U.S. reserves, with liquids representing about 15 percent of reserves. Production operations are mostly offshore and, as a result, are also capital intensive. Other U.S. areas represent the remaining 34 percent of U.S. reserves, which are about evenly split between liquids and natural gas. For production of crude oil, some fields utilize enhanced recovery methods, including water-flood and CO2 injection.
     For the three years ending December 31, 2009, the pattern of net reserve changes shown in the following tables are not necessarily indicative of future trends. Apart from acquisitions, the company’s ability to add proved reserves is affected by, among other things, events and circumstances that are outside the company’s control, such as delays in government permitting, partner approvals of development plans, declines in oil and gas prices, OPEC constraints, geopolitical uncertainties and civil unrest.
     The company’s estimated net proved oil and natural gas reserves and changes thereto for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009 are shown in the following table and on page FS-74.


Net Proved Reserves of Crude Oil, Condensate, Natural Gas Li qui ds and Synthetic Oil
 
                                     Total 
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies  Consolidated 
              Synthetic              Synthetic      and Affiliated 
Millions of barrels U.S.  Africa  Asia  Oil(1,2)  Other  Total  TCO  Oil(1,3)  Other  Companies 
       
Reserves at Jan. 1, 2007
  1,751   1,698   1,259       586   5,294   1,950       562   7,806 
Changes attributable to:                                        
Revisions  (5)  (89)  (54)      2   (146)  92       11   (43)
Improved recovery  9   7   4          20             20 
Extensions and discoveries  36   6          18   60             60 
Purchases5
  10                10          316   326 
Sales6
  (9)               (9)         (432)  (441)
Production  (168)  (122)  (186)      (88)  (564)  (53)      (24)  (641)
     
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20074
  1,624   1,500   1,023       518   4,665   1,989       433   7,087 
Changes attributable to:                                        
Revisions  (16)  2   574       (24)  536   249       18   803 
Improved recovery  5   1   18       3   27          10   37 
Extensions and discoveries  17   3   5       8   33             33 
Purchases  1                1             1 
Sales6
  (7)               (7)            (7)
Production  (154)  (121)  (164)      (81)  (520)  (62)      (22)  (604)
     
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20084
  1,470   1,385   1,456      424   4,735   2,176      439   7,350 
Changes attributable to:                                        
Revisions  63   (46)  (121)  460   (1)  355   (184)  266   (269)  168 
Improved recovery  2   48            50   36         86 
Extensions and discoveries  6   10   3      33   52            52 
Purchases                              
Sales6
  (3)           (6)  (9)           (9)
Production  (177)  (151)  (167)     (78)  (573)  (82)     (19)  (674)
 
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20094
  1,361   1,246   1,171   460   372   4,610   1,946   266   151   6,973 
 

     During the year, the RAC is represented in meetings with each of the company’s upstream business units to review and discuss reserve changes recommended by the various asset teams. Major changes are also reviewed with the company’s Strategy and Planning Committee and the Executive Committee, whose members include the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The company’s annual reserve activity is also reviewed with the Board of Directors. If major changes to reserves were to occur between the annual reviews, those matters would also be discussed with the Board.

     RAC subteams also conduct in-depth reviews during the year of many of the fields that have the largest proved reserves quantities. These reviews include an examination of the proved-reserve records and documentation of their alignment with theCorporate Reserves Manual.
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting  In December 2008, the SEC issued its final rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (Release Nos. 33-8995; 34-59192; FR-78). The disclosure requirements under the final rule will become
1 Prospective reporting effective for the company in its Form 10-K filing for the year ending December 31, 2009. The final rule changes a number of oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosure requirements under SEC Regulations S-K and S-X.
     Among the principal changes in the final rule are requirements to use a price based on a 12-month average for reserve estimation and disclosure instead of a single end-of-year price; expanding the definition of oil and gas producing activities to include nontraditional sources such as bitumen extracted from oil sands; permitting the use of new reliable technologies to establish reasonable certainty of proved reserves; allowing optional disclosure of probable and possible reserves; modifying the definition of geographic area for disclosure of reserve estimates and production; amending disclosures of proved reserve quantities to include separate disclosures of synthetic oil and gas; expanding proved, undeveloped reserve disclosures (PUDs), including discussion of PUDs five years old or more; and disclosure of the qualifications of the chief technical person who oversees the company’s overall reserves estimation process.
Reserve Quantities  At December 31, 2008, oil-equivalent reserves for the company’s consolidated operations were 7.9 billion barrels. (Refer to the term “Reserves” on page E-147 for the definition of oil-equivalent reserves.) Approximately 25 percent of the total reserves were in the United States. For the company’s interests in equity affiliates, oil-equivalent reserves were 3.3 billion barrels, 82 percent of which were associated with the company’s 50 percent ownership in TCO.
     Aside from the Tengiz Field in the TCO affiliate, no single property accounted for more than 5 percent of the company’s total oil-equivalent proved reserves. About 20 other individual properties in the company’s portfolio of assets

each contained between 1 percent and 5 percent of the company’s oil-equivalent proved reserves, which in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40 percent of the company’s total proved reserves. These properties were geographically dispersed, located in the United States, South America, West Africa, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region.

     In the United States, total oil-equivalent reserves at year-end 2008 were 2.0 billion barrels. Of this amount, 43 percent, 22 percent and 35 percent were located in California, the Gulf of Mexico and other U.S. areas, respectively.
     In California, liquids reserves represented 94 percent of the total, with most classified as heavy oil. Because of heavy oil’s high viscosity and the need to employ enhanced recovery methods, the producing operations are capital intensive in nature. Most of the company’s heavy-oil fields in California employ a continuous steamflooding process.
     In the Gulf of Mexico region, liquids represented approximately 66 percent of total oil-equivalent reserves. Production operations are mostly offshore and, as a result, are also capital intensive. Costs include investments in wells, production platforms and other facilities, such as gathering lines and storage facilities.
     In other U.S. areas, the reserves were split about equally between liquids and natural gas. For production of crude oil, some fields utilize enhanced recovery methods, including water-flood and CO2 injection.
     The pattern of net reserve changes shown in the following tables, for the three years ending December 31, 2008, is not necessarily indicative of future trends. Apart from acquisitions, the company’s ability to add proved reserves is affected by, among other things, events and circumstances that are outside the company’s control, such as delays in government permitting, partner approvals of development plans, declines in oil and gas prices, OPEC constraints, geopolitical uncertainties and civil unrest.
     The upward revision in Thailand reflected additional drilling and development activity during the year. These upward revisions were partially offset by reductions in reservoir performance in Nigeria and the United Kingdom, which decreased reserves by 43 million barrels and by 32 million barrels, respectively. Most of the upward revision for affiliated companies was related to a 60 million-barrel increase in TCO as a result of improved reservoir performance.
     In 2007, net revisions decreased reserves by 146 million barrels for worldwide consolidated companies and increased reserves by 103 million barrels for equity affiliates. For consolidated companies, the largest downward net revisions were 89 million barrels in Africa and 66 million barrels in Indonesia. The company’s estimated net proved oil and natural gas reserves and changes thereto for the years 2006, 2007 and 2008 are shown in the tables on pages FS-69 and FS-71.



FS-68





Table VReserve Quantity Information - Continued

 

Net Proved Reserves of Crude Oil, Condensate and Natural Gas Liquids

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of barrels Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
      
Reserves at Jan. 1, 20061
  965   333   533   1,831   1,814   829   579   573   3,795   5,626   1,939   435 
Changes attributable to:                                                
Revisions  (14)  7   7      (49)  72   61   (45)  39   39   60   24 
Improved recovery  49      3   52   13   1   6   11   31   83       
Extensions and discoveries     25   8   33   30   6   2   36   74   107       
Purchases2
  2   2      4   15         2   17   21      119 
Sales3
                       (15)  (15)  (15)      
Production  (76)  (42)  (51)  (169)  (125)  (123)  (72)  (78)  (398)  (567)  (49)  (16)
 
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20061
  926   325   500   1,751   1,698   785   576   484   3,543   5,294   1,950   562 
Changes attributable to:                                                
Revisions  1   (1)  (5)  (5)  (89)  7   (66)  7   (141)  (146)  92   11 
Improved recovery  6      3   9   7   3   1      11   20       
Extensions and discoveries  1   25   10   36   6   1      17   24   60       
Purchases2
  1   9      10                  10      316 
Sales3
     (8)  (1)  (9)                 (9)     (432)
Production  (75)  (43)  (50)  (168)  (122)  (128)  (72)  (74)  (396)  (564)  (53)  (24)
 
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20071
  860   307   457   1,624   1,500   668   439   434   3,041   4,665   1,989   433 
Changes attributable to:                                                
Revisions  10   4   (30)  (16)  2   384   191   (25)  552   536   249   18 
Improved recovery  4      1   5   1   17   1   3   22   27      10 
Extensions and discoveries  1   13   3   17   3   3   2   8   16   33       
Purchases        1   1                  1       
Sales3
     (6)  (1)  (7)                 (7)      
Production  (73)  (32)  (49)  (154)  (121)  (110)  (66)  (69)  (366)  (520)  (62)  (22)
 
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20081,4
  802   286   382   1,470   1,385   962   567   351   3,265   4,735   2,176   439 
 
Developed Reserves5
                                                
 
At Jan. 1, 2006  809   177   474   1,460   945   534   439   416   2,334   3,794   1,611   196 
At Dec. 31, 2006  749   163   443   1,355   893   530   426   349   2,198   3,553   1,003   311 
At Dec. 31, 2007  701   136   401   1,238   758   422   363   305   1,848   3,086   1,273   263 
At Dec. 31, 2008
  679   140   339   1,158   789   666   474   249   2,178   3,336   1,369   263 
 
2 Reserves associated with Canada.
3 Reserves associated with Venezuela that were reported in other as heavy oil in 2008 and 2007.
4 Included are year-end reserve quantities related to production-sharing contracts (PSC) (refer to page E-42 for the definition of a PSC). PSC-related reserve quantities are 26 percent, 32 percent and 26 percent for consolidated companies for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
1Included are year-end reserve quantities related to production-sharing contracts (PSC) (refer to page E-146 for the definition of a PSC). PSC-related reserve quantities are 32 percent, 26 percent and 30 percent for consolidated companies for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
2Includes reserves acquired through nonmonetary transactions.
3
5 Includes reserves acquired through nonmonetary transactions.
6Includes reserves disposed of through nonmonetary transactions.
4Net reserve changes (excluding production) in 2008 consist of 770 million barrels of developed reserves and (180) million barrels of undeveloped reserves for consolidated companies and 180 million barrels of developed reserves and 97 million barrels of undeveloped reserves for affiliated companies.
5During 2008, the percentages of undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2007, transferred to developed reserves were 18 percent and 2 percent for consolidated companies and affiliated companies, respectively.

Information on Canadian Oil Sands Net Proved Reserves Not Included Above:

In addition to conventional liquids and natural gas proved reserves, Chevron has a 20 percent nonoperated working interest in the Athabasca oil-sands project in Canada. As of year-end 2008, SEC regulations defined oil-sands reserves as mining-related and not a part of conventional oil and gas reserves. Net proved oil-sands reserves were 436 million and 443 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The oil-sands quantities were not classified as proved reserves at the end of 2008 because under the provisions of SEC Industry Guide 7,Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to Be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations,a mineral deposit must be economically producible at the time of the reserve determination in order to be classified as proved. Due to the decline in crude-oil prices at the end of 2008, the operating costs of the Athabasca project exceeded the revenues from crude-oil sales at that time. The inability to classify the oil-sands volumes as proved at the end of 2008 did not affect the daily operations of the Athabasca project nor the activities under way to expand those operations. During 2008, bitumen production for the project averaged 126,000 barrels per day (27,000 net). The expansion project is designed to increase production capacity to 255,000 barrels per day in late 2010. The oil-sands proved reserves for 2007 and 2006 are not included in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows for conventional oil and gas reserves on page FS-73.

     Noteworthy amounts in the categories of liquids proved-reserve changes for 2006 through 2008 are discussed below:

Revisions  In 2006, net revisions increased reserves by 39 million and 84 million barrels for worldwide consolidated companies and equity affiliates, respectively. International consolidated companies accounted for the net increase of 39 million barrels. The largest upward net revisions were 61 mil-

FS-72

lion barrels in Indonesia and 27 million barrels in Thailand. In Indonesia, the increase was the result of infill drilling and improved steamflood and waterflood performance.

     In Africa, the decrease was mainly based on field performance data for fields in Nigeria and the effect of higher year-end prices in Angola and Republic of the Congo. In Indonesia, the decline also reflected the impact of higher



FS-69


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Table V Reserve Quantity Information - Continued

     Noteworthy amounts in the categories of liquids proved-reserve changes for 2007 through 2009 are discussed below:
RevisionsIn 2007, net revisions decreased reserves by 146 million barrels for worldwide consolidated companies and increased reserves by 103 million barrels for equity affiliates. For consolidated companies, the largest downward net revisions were 89 million barrels in Africa and 54 million barrels in Asia.
     In 2008, net revisions increased reserves by 536 million barrels for worldwide consolidated companies and increased reserves by 267 million barrels for equity affiliates. For consolidated companies, the largest increase was in the Asia region, which added 574 million barrels. The majority of the increase was in the Partitioned Zone, as a result of a concession extension, and Indonesia, due to lower year-end prices. Upward revisions were also recorded in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan and were mainly associated with the effect of lower year-end prices on the calculation of reserves associated with production-sharing and variable-royalty contracts. In Indonesia, reserves increased due mainly to the impact of lower year-end prices on the reserve calculations for production-sharing contracts, as well as a result of development drilling and improved waterflood and steam-flood performance. These increases were offset by downward revisions in the United States and Other regions. For affiliated companies, the 249 million-barrel increase for TCO was due to the effect of lower year-end prices on the royalty determination and facility optimization at the Tengiz and Korolev fields.
     In 2009, net revisions increased reserves by 355 million barrels for worldwide consolidated companies and decreased reserves by 187 million barrels for equity affiliates. For consolidated companies, the largest increase was 460 million barrels in the Other regions due to the inclusion of synthetic oil related to Canadian oil sands. In the United States, reserves increased 63 million barrels as a result of development drilling and performance revisions. The increases were partially offset by decreases of 121 million barrels in Asia and 46 million barrels in Africa. In Asia, decreases in Indonesia and Azerbaijan were driven by the effect of higher 12-month average prices on the calculation of reserves associated with
production-sharing contracts and the effect of reservoir performance revisions. In Africa, reserves in Nigeria declined as a result of higher prices on production-sharing contracts and reservoir performance.

year-end prices. Higher prices also resulted in downward revisions in Karachaganak and Azerbaijan. For equity affiliates, most of the upward revision was related to a 92 million-barrel increase for TCO’s Tengiz Field and an 11 million-barrel increase for Petroboscan in Venezuela, both as a result of improved reservoir performance. At TCO, the upward revision was tempered by the negative impact of higher year-end prices.

     In 2008, net revisions increased reserves by 536 million barrels for worldwide consolidated companies and increased reserves by 267 million barrels for equity affiliates. For consolidated companies, international areas added 552 million barrels. The largest increase was in the Asia-Pacific region, which added 384 million barrels. The majority of the increase was in the Partitioned Neutral Zone as a result of a concession extension. Upward revisions were also recorded in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan and were mainly associated with the effect of lower year-end prices on the calculation of reserves associated with production-sharing and variable-royalty contracts. In Indonesia, reserves increased 191 million barrels due mainly to the impact of lower year-end prices on the reserve calculations for production-sharing contracts, as well as a result of development drilling and improved waterflood and steamflood performance. For affiliate companies, the 249 million-barrel increase for TCO was due to the effect of lower year-end prices on the royalty determination and facility optimization at the Tengiz and Korolev fields.
Improved Recovery  In 2006, improved recovery increased liquids volumes worldwide by 83 million barrels for consolidated companies. Reserves in the United States increased 52 million barrels, with California representing 49 million barrels of the total increase due to steamflood expansion and revised modeling activities. Internationally, improved recovery increased reserves by 31 million barrels, with no single country accounting for an increase of more than 10 million barrels.
     In 2007, improved recovery increased liquids volumes by 20 million barrels worldwide. No addition was individually significant.
     In 2008, improved recovery increased worldwide liquids volumes by 37 million barrels. International consolidated companies accounted for 22 million barrels and the United States accounted for 5 million barrels. The largest addition
     For affiliated companies, TCO declined by 184 million-barrels primarily due to the effect of higher 12-month average prices on royalty determination. For Other affiliated companies, 266 million barrels of heavy crude oil were reclassified to synthetic oil for the activities in Venezuela.
Improved RecoveryIn 2007, improved recovery increased liquids volumes by 20 million barrels worldwide. No addition was individually significant.
     In 2008, improved recovery increased worldwide liquids volumes by 37 million barrels. For consolidated companies, the largest addition was in the Asia region related to gas reinjection in Kazakhstan. Affiliated companies increased reserves 10 million barrels due to improved secondary recovery at Boscan.
     In 2009, improved recovery increased liquids volumes by 86 million barrels worldwide. Consolidated companies accounted for 50 million barrels. The largest addition was related to improved secondary recovery in Nigeria. Affiliated companies increased reserves 36 million barrels due to improvements related to the TCO SGI/SGP facilities.
Extensions and DiscoveriesIn 2007, extensions and discoveries increased liquids volumes by 60 million barrels worldwide. The largest additions were 36 million barrels in the United States, mainly for the deepwater Tahiti and Mad Dog fields in the Gulf of Mexico.
     In 2008, extensions and discoveries increased consolidated company reserves 33 million barrels worldwide. The United States increased reserves 17 million barrels, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico. The Africa, Asia, and Other regions increased reserves 16 million barrels with no one country resulting in additions greater than 5 million barrels.
     In 2009, extensions and discoveries increased liquids volumes by 52 million barrels worldwide. The largest additions were 33 million barrels in Other regions related to the Gorgon Project in Australia and delineation drilling in Argentina. Africa and the United States accounted for 10 million barrels and 6 million barrels, respectively.
PurchasesIn 2007, acquisitions of 316 million barrels for equity affiliates related to the formation of a new Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela.
SalesIn 2007, affiliated company sales of 432 million barrels related to the dissolution of a Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela.


FS-73

was related to gas reinjection in Kazakhstan. Affiliated companies increased reserves 10 million barrels due to improved secondary recovery at Boscan.

Extensions and Discoveries  In 2006, extensions and discoveries increased liquids volumes worldwide by 107 million barrels for consolidated companies. Reserves in Nigeria increased by 27 million barrels due in part to the initial booking of reserves for the Aparo Field. Additional drilling activities contributed 19 million barrels in the United Kingdom and 14 million barrels in Argentina. In the United States, the Gulf of Mexico added 25 million barrels, mainly the result of the initial booking of the Great White Field in the deepwater Perdido Fold Belt area.
     In 2007, extensions and discoveries increased liquids volumes by 60 million barrels worldwide. The largest additions were 25 million barrels in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, mainly for the deepwater Tahiti and Mad Dog fields.
     In 2008, extensions and discoveries increased consolidated company reserves 33 million barrels worldwide. The United States increased reserves 17 million barrels, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico. International companies increased reserves 16 million barrels with no one country resulting in additions greater than 5 million barrels.
Purchases  In 2006, acquisitions increased liquids volumes worldwide by 21 million barrels for consolidated companies and 119 million barrels for equity affiliates. For consolidated companies, the amount was mainly the result of new agreements in Nigeria, which added 13 million barrels of reserves. The other-equity-affiliates quantity reflects the result of the conversion of Boscan and LL-652 operations to joint stock companies in Venezuela.
     In 2007, acquisitions of 316 million barrels for equity affiliates related to the formation of a new Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela.
Sales  In 2006, sales decreased reserves by 15 million barrels due to the conversion of the LL-652 risked service agreement to a joint stock company in Venezuela.
     In 2007, affiliated company sales of 432 million barrels related to the dissolution of a Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela.



FS-70


Net Proved Reserves of Natural Gas



Table V Reserve Quantity Information - Continued

                                 
                              Total 
                              Consolidated 
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies  and Affiliated 
Billions of cubic feet U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other  Companies 
        
Reserves at Jan 1, 2007  4,028   3,206   7,102   5,574   19,910   2,743   231   22,884 
Changes attributable to:                                
Revisions  209   (141)  346   (19)  395   75   (2)  468 
Improved recovery           1   1         1 
Extensions and discoveries  86   11   358   63   518         518 
Purchases1
  50      91      141      211   352 
Sales3
  (76)           (76)     (175)  (251)
Production  (620)  (27)  (690)  (415)  (1,752)  (70)  (10)  (1,832)
  
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20072
  3,677   3,049   7,207   5,204   19,137   2,748   255   22,140 
Changes attributable to:                                
Revisions  (28)  60   1,073   61   1,166   498   632   2,296 
Improved recovery                        
Extensions and discoveries  108      23   1   132         132 
Purchases  66      441      507         507 
Sales3
  (124)           (124)        (124)
Production  (549)  (53)  (748)  (446)  (1,796)  (71)  (9)  (1,876)
  
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20082
  3,150   3,056   7,996   4,820   19,022   3,175   878   23,075 
Changes attributable to:                                
Revisions  39   4   493   33   569   (237)  193   525 
Improved recovery                        
Extensions and discoveries  53   3   54   4,277   4,387         4,387 
Purchases                        
Sales  (33)        (84)  (117)        (117)
Production  (511)  (42)  (683)  (472)  (1,708)  (105)  (8)  (1,821)
  
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20092,4
  2,698   3,021   7,860   8,574   22,153   2,833   1,063   26,049 
 
1 Includes reserves acquired through nonmonetary transactions.
 

Net Proved Reserves of Natural Gas

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Billions of cubic feet Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
      
Reserves at Jan. 1, 20061
  304   1,171   2,953   4,428   3,191   8,623   646   3,578   16,038   20,466   2,787   181 
Changes attributable to:                                                
Revisions  32   40   (102)  (30)  34   400   38   39   511   481   26    
Improved recovery  5         5   3         5   8   13       
Extensions and discoveries     111   157   268   11   510      10   531   799       
Purchases2
  6   13      19      16         16   35      54 
Sales3
        (1)  (1)           (148)  (148)  (149)      
Production  (37)  (241)  (383)  (661)  (33)  (629)  (110)  (302)  (1,074)  (1,735)  (70)  (4)
  
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20061
  310   1,094  ��2,624   4,028   3,206   8,920   574   3,182   15,882   19,910   2,743   231 
Changes attributable to:                                                
Revisions  40   39   130   209   (141)  149   12   166   186   395   75   (2)
Improved recovery                       1   1   1       
Extensions and discoveries     40   46   86   11   392      29   432   518       
Purchases2
  2   19   29   50      91         91   141      211 
Sales3
     (39)  (37)  (76)                 (76)     (175)
Production  (35)  (210)  (375)  (620)  (27)  (725)  (101)  (279)  (1,132)  (1,752)  (70)  (10)
  
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20071
  317   943   2,417   3,677   3,049   8,827   485   3,099   15,460   19,137   2,748   255 
Changes attributable to:                                                
Revisions  8   21   (57)  (28)  60   961   107   66   1,194   1,166   498   632 
Improved recovery                                    
Extensions and discoveries     95   13   108      23      1   24   132       
Purchases        66   66      441         441   507       
Sales3
     (27)  (97)  (124)                 (124)      
Production  (32)  (161)  (356)  (549)  (53)  (769)  (117)  (308)  (1,247)  (1,796)  (71)  (9)
  
Reserves at Dec. 31, 20081,4
  293   871   1,986   3,150   3,056   9,483   475   2,858   15,872   19,022   3,175   878 
  
Developed Reserves5
                                                
At Jan. 1, 2006  251   977   2,794   4,022   1,346   4,819   449   2,453   9,067   13,089   2,314   85 
At Dec. 31, 2006  250   873   2,434   3,557   1,306   4,751   377   1,912   8,346   11,903   1,412   144 
At Dec. 31, 2007  261   727   2,238   3,226   1,151   5,081   326   1,915   8,473   11,699   1,762   117 
At Dec. 31, 2008
  247   669   1,793   2,709   1,209   5,374   302   2,245   9,130   11,839   1,999   124 
  
Includes year-end reserve quantities related to production-sharing contracts (PSC) (refer to page E-1462 Includes year-end reserve quantities related to production-sharing contracts (PSC) (refer to page E-42 for the definition of a PSC). PSC-related reserve quantities are 31 percent, 40 percent and 37 percent for consolidated companies for 2009, 2008 and 47 percent for consolidated companies for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Includes reserves acquired through nonmonetary transactions.
3Includes reserves disposed of through nonmonetary transactions.
Net reserve

     Noteworthy amounts in the categories of natural gas
proved-reserve changes (excluding production) in 2008 consist of 1,936 billion cubic feet of developed reserves and (255) billion cubic feet of undevelopedfor 2007 through 2009 are discussed below:
RevisionsIn 2007, net revisions increased reserves for consolidated companies by 395 BCF and 324 billion cubic feet of developed reserves and 806 billion cubic feet of undevelopedincreased reserves for affiliated companies.
Duringcompanies by 73 BCF. For consolidated companies, net increases of 346 BCF in Asia and 209 BCF in the United States were partially offset by downward revisions of 160 BCF in Africa and Other regions. In the Asia region, drilling activities in Thailand added 360 BCF, which were partially offset by downward revisions in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan due to the impact of higher prices. In the United States, improved reservoir performance for many fields contributed to the increase with the largest portion in the
mid-continent areas. Decreases in Africa were primarily due to a 136 BCF downward revision in Nigeria resulting from field performance. The Other regions had net downward revisions of 19 BCF. A 185 BCF downward revision in Australia due to drilling results and other smaller declines
were mostly offset by improved reservoir performance in Trinidad and Tobago which added 188 BCF.
     TCO had an upward revision of 75 BCF associated with improved reservoir performance and development activities. This upward revision was net of a negative impact due to higher year-end prices on royalty determination.
     In 2008, the percentages of undevelopednet revisions increased reserves at December 31, 2007, transferred to developed reserves were 12 percent and 0 percent for consolidated companies by 1,166 BCF and increased reserves for affiliated companies respectively.

     Noteworthy amounts in the categories of natural gas proved-reserve changes for 2006 through 2008 are discussed below:
RevisionsIn 2006, revisions accounted for a net increase of 481 billion cubic feet (BCF) for consolidated companies and 26 BCF for affiliates. For consolidated companies, net increases of 511 BCF internationally were partially offset by a 30 BCF downward revision in the United States. Drilling and development activities added 337 BCF of reservesby 1,130 BCF. In the Asia region, positive revisions totaled 1,073 BCF for consolidated companies. Almost half of the increase was attributed to the Karachaganak Field in Kazakhstan, due mainly to the effects of low year-end prices on the
production-sharing contract and the results of development drilling and improved recovery. Other large upward revisions were recorded for the Pattani Field in Thailand while Kazakhstan added 200 BCF, largely due to development activity. Trinidad and Tobago increased 185 BCF, attributable to improved reservoir performance and a successful drilling campaign.

     For the TCO affiliate in Kazakhstan, an increase of 498 BCF reflected the impacts of lower year-end prices on royalty determination and facility optimization. Reserves associated


FS-74

new contract for sales of natural gas. These additions were partially offset by downward revisions of 224 BCF in the United Kingdom and 130 BCF in Australia due to drilling results and reservoir performance. U.S. “Other” had a downward revision of 102 BCF due to reservoir performance, which was partially offset by upward revisions of 72 BCF in the Gulf of Mexico and California related to reservoir performance and development drilling. TCO had an upward revision of 26 BCF associated with additional development activity and updated reservoir performance.

     In 2007, revisions increased reserves for consolidated companies by a net 395 BCF and increased reserves for affili-



FS-71


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities



with the Angola LNG project accounted for a majority of the 632 BCF increase in Other affiliated companies.
     In 2009, net revisions increased reserves by 569 BCF for consolidated companies and decreased reserves by 44 BCF for affiliated companies. For consolidated companies, net increases were 493 BCF in Asia primarily as a result of reservoir studies in Bangladesh and development drilling in Thailand. These results were partially offset by a downward revision due to the impact of higher prices on production-sharing contracts in Myanmar. The United States and Other regions increased reserves 39 BCF and 33 BCF, respectively. In the United States, development drilling in the Gulf of Mexico was partially offset by performance revisions in the California and mid-continent areas. In Other regions, improved reservoir performance and compression in Australia was partially offset by the effect of higher prices on production-sharing contracts in Trinidad.
     For equity affiliates, a downward revision of 237 BCF at TCO was due to the effect of higher prices on royalty determination and an increase in gas injection for SGI/SGP facilities. This decline was partially offset by performance and drilling opportunities related to the Angola LNG project.
Extensions and DiscoveriesIn 2007, extensions and discoveries accounted for an increase of 518 BCF worldwide. The largest addition was 330 BCF in Bangladesh, the result of drilling activities. Other additions were not individually significant.
     In 2009, worldwide extensions and discoveries of 4,387 BCF were attributed to consolidated companies. The Gorgon Project in Australia accounted for essentially all of the 4,277 BCF additions in the Other regions. In Asia, development drilling in Thailand accounted for the majority of the increase. In the United States, delineation drilling in California accounted for the majority of the increase.
PurchasesIn 2007, purchases of natural gas reserves were 141 BCF for consolidated companies, which include the acquisition of an additional interest in the Bibiyana Field in Bangladesh. Affiliated company purchases of 211 BCF related to the formation of a new Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela and an initial booking related to the Angola LNG project.
SalesIn 2007, sales were 76 BCF and 175 BCF for consolidated companies and equity affiliates, respectively. The affiliated company sales related to the dissolution of a Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela.
     In 2009, worldwide sales of 117 BCF were related to consolidated companies. For the Other regions, the sale of properties in Argentina accounted for 84 BCF. The sale of properties in the Gulf of Mexico accounted for the majority of the 33 BCF decrease in the United States.
Table VI Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Table V Reserve Quantity Information - Continued     The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, related to the preceding proved oil and gas reserves, is calculated in accordance with the requirements of the FASB. Estimated future cash inflows from production are computed by applying
12 month-average prices for oil and gas to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Future price changes are limited to those provided by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting year. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce year-end estimated proved reserves based on year-end cost indices, assuming continuation of year-end economic conditions, and include estimated costs for asset retirement obligations. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future pretax net cash flows, less the tax basis of related assets. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using 10 percent midperiod discount factors. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimate of when future expenditures will be incurred and when reserves will be produced.

ated companies by a net 73 BCF. For consolidated companies, net increases were 209 BCF in the United States and 186 BCF internationally. Improved reservoir performance for many fields in the United States contributed 130 BCF in the “Other” region, 40 BCF in California and 39 BCF in the Gulf of Mexico. Drilling activities added 360 BCF in Thailand and improved reservoir performance added 188 BCF in Trinidad and Tobago. These additions were partially offset by downward revisions of 185 BCF in Australia due to drilling results and 136 BCF in Nigeria due to field performance. Negative revisions due to the impact of higher prices were recorded in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. TCO had an upward revision of 75 BCF associated with improved reservoir performance and development activities. This upward revision was net of a negative impact due to higher year-end prices.

     In 2008, revisions increased reserves for consolidated companies by a net 1,166 BCF and increased reserves for affiliated companies by 1,130 BCF. In the Asia-Pacific region, positive revisions totaled 961 BCF for consolidated companies. Almost half of the increase was attributed to the Karachaganak Field in Kazakhstan, due mainly to the effects of low year-end prices on the production-sharing contract and the results of development drilling and improved recovery. Other large upward revisions were recorded for the Pattani Field in Thailand due to a successful drilling campaign. For the TCO affiliate in Kazakhstan, an increase of 498 BCF reflected the impacts of lower year-end prices on the royalty determination and facility optimization. Reserves associated with the Angola LNG project accounted for a majority of the 632 BCF increase in “Other” affiliated companies.
Extensions and Discoveries  In 2006, extensions and discoveries accounted for an increase of 799 BCF for consolidated companies, reflecting a 531 BCF increase outside the United States and a U.S. increase of 268 BCF. Bangladesh added 451 BCF, the result of development activity and field extensions, and Thailand added 59 BCF, the result of drilling activities. U.S. “Other” contributed 157 BCF, approximately half of which was related to South Texas and the Piceance Basin, and the Gulf of Mexico added 111 BCF, partly due to the initial booking of reserves at the Great White Field in the deepwater Perdido Fold Belt area.
     In 2007, extensions and discoveries accounted for an increase of 518 BCF worldwide. The largest addition was 330 BCF in Bangladesh, the result of drilling activities. Other additions were not individually significant.
Purchases  In 2006, purchases of natural gas reserves were 35 BCF for consolidated companies, about evenly divided between the company’s U.S. and international operations. Affiliated companies added 54 BCF of reserves, the result of conversion of an operating service agreement to a joint stock company in Venezuela.
     The information provided does not represent management’s estimate of the company’s expected future cash flows or value of proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved-reserve quantities are imprecise and change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, probable and possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, are excluded from the calculations. The arbitrary valuation prescribed by the FASB requires assumptions as to the timing and amount of future development and production costs. The calculations are made as of December 31 each year and should not be relied upon as an indication of the company’s future cash flows or value of its oil and gas reserves. In the following table, “Standardized Measure Net Cash Flows” refers to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.


FS-75

     In 2007, purchases of natural gas reserves were 141 BCF for consolidated companies, which include the acquisition of an additional interest in the Bibiyana Field in Bangladesh. Affiliated company purchases of 211 BCF related to the formation of a new Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela and an initial booking related to the Angola LNG project.

Sales  In 2006, sales for consolidated companies totaled 149 BCF, mostly associated with the conversion of a risked service agreement to a joint stock company in Venezuela.
     In 2007, sales were 76 BCF and 175 BCF for consolidated companies and equity affiliates, respectively. The affiliated company sales related to the dissolution of a Hamaca equity affiliate in Venezuela.

Table VI – Standardized Measure of Discounted Future
                  Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil
                  and Gas Reserves

     The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, related to the preceding proved oil and gas reserves, is calculated in accordance with the requirements of FAS 69. Estimated future cash inflows from production are computed by applying year-end prices for oil and gas to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Future price changes are limited to those provided by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting year. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce year-end estimated proved reserves based on year-end cost indices, assuming continuation of year-end economic conditions, and include estimated costs for asset retirement obligations. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future pretax net cash flows, less the tax basis of related assets. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using 10 percent midperiod discount factors. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimate of when future expenditures will be incurred and when reserves will be produced.
     The information provided does not represent management’s estimate of the company’s expected future cash flows or value of proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved-reserve quantities are imprecise and change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, probable and possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, are excluded from the calculations. The arbitrary valuation prescribed under FAS 69 requires assumptions as to the timing and amount of future development and production costs. The calculations are made as of December 31 each year and should not be relied upon as an indication of the company’s future cash flows or value of its oil and gas reserves. In the following table, “Standardized Measure Net Cash Flows” refers to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.



FS-72





Table VIStandardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash
 Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
- Continued

                                 
                              Total 
                              Consolidated 
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies  and Affiliated 
Millions of dollars U.S.  Africa  Asia  Other  Total  TCO  Other  Companies 
        
At December 31, 2009                                
Future cash inflows from production1
 $81,332  $75,338  $91,993  $101,114  $349,777  $97,793  $23,825  $471,395 
Future production costs  (35,295)  (22,459)  (31,843)  (42,206)  (131,803)  (6,923)  (4,765)  (143,491)
Future development costs  (7,027)  (14,715)  (12,884)  (16,643)  (51,269)  (8,190)  (3,986)  (63,445)
Future income taxes  (13,662)  (22,503)  (18,905)  (17,427)  (72,497)  (23,357)  (7,774)  (103,628)
 
Undiscounted future net cash flows  25,348   15,661   28,361   24,838   94,208   59,323   7,300   160,831 
10 percent midyear annual discount
for timing of estimated cash flows
  (8,822)  (5,882)  (11,722)  (17,506)  (43,932)  (34,937)  (4,450)  (83,319)
 
Standardized Measure
Net Cash Flows
 $16,526  $9,779  $16,639  $7,332  $50,276  $24,386  $2,850  $77,512 
 
At December 31, 2008                                
Future cash inflows from production2
 $66,174  $52,344  $75,855  $37,408  $231,781  $51,252  $13,968  $297,001 
Future production costs  (45,738)  (20,302)  (33,817)  (15,363)  (115,220)  (14,502)  (2,319)  (132,041)
Future development costs  (6,099)  (19,001)  (15,298)  (3,408)  (43,806)  (10,140)  (1,551)  (55,497)
Future income taxes  (5,091)  (9,581)  (10,278)  (7,593)  (32,543)  (7,517)  (5,223)  (45,283)
 
Undiscounted future net cash flows  9,246   3,460   16,462   11,044   40,212   19,093   4,875   64,180 
10 percent midyear annual discount
for timing of estimated cash flows
  (2,318)  (1,139)  (7,042)  (4,052)  (14,551)  (11,261)  (2,966)  (28,778)
 
Standardized Measure
Net Cash Flows
 $6,928  $2,321  $9,420  $6,992  $25,661  $7,832  $1,909  $35,402 
 
At December 31, 2007                                
Future cash inflows from production2
 $162,138  $132,450  $110,749  $62,883  $468,220  $159,078  $29,845  $657,143 
Future production costs  (41,861)  (15,707)  (29,150)  (17,132)  (103,850)  (10,408)  (1,529)  (115,787)
Future development costs  (8,080)  (11,516)  (10,989)  (4,754)  (35,339)  (8,580)  (1,175)  (45,094)
Future income taxes  (39,840)  (74,172)  (29,367)  (18,791)  (162,170)  (39,575)  (13,600)  (215,345)
 
Undiscounted future net cash flows  72,357   31,055   41,243   22,206   166,861   100,515   13,541   280,917 
10 percent midyear annual discount
for timing of estimated cash flows
  (31,133)  (14,171)  (16,091)  (8,417)  (69,812)  (64,519)  (7,779)  (142,110)
 
Standardized Measure
Net Cash Flows
 $41,224  $16,884  $25,152  $13,789  $97,049  $35,996  $5,762  $138,807 
 
1Based on 12-month average price.
 
2Based on year-end prices.

FS-76

                                                 
  Consolidated Companies    
  United States  International        
      Gulf of      Total      Asia-          Total      Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars Calif.  Mexico  Other  U.S.  Africa  Pacific  Indonesia  Other  Int’l.  Total  TCO  Other 
        
At December 31, 2008
                                                
Future cash inflows from production $27,223  $  16,407  $  22,544  $  66,174  $  52,344  $  67,386  $  22,836  $  23,041  $  165,607  $  231,781  $  51,252  $  13,968 
Future production costs  (20,554)  (8,311)  (16,873)  (45,738)  (20,302)  (21,949)  (17,857)  (9,374)  (69,482)  (115,220)  (14,502)  (2,319)
Future devel. costs  (3,087)  (1,650)  (1,362)  (6,099)  (19,001)  (12,575)  (3,632)  (2,499)  (37,707)  (43,806)  (10,140)  (1,551)
Future income taxes  (1,272)  (2,289)  (1,530)  (5,091)  (9,581)  (11,906)  (613)  (5,352)  (27,452)  (32,543)  (7,517)  (5,223)
  
Undiscounted future net cash flows  2,310   4,157   2,779   9,246   3,460   20,956   734   5,816   30,966   40,212   19,093   4,875 
10 percent midyear annual discount for timing of estimated cash flows  (1,118)  (583)  (617)  (2,318)  (1,139)  (9,145)  (352)  (1,597)  (12,233)  (14,551)  (11,261)  (2,966)
  
Standardized Measure
                                                
Net Cash Flows
 $1,192  $3,574  $2,162  $6,928  $2,321  $11,811  $382  $4,219  $18,733  $25,661  $7,832  $1,909 
  
At December 31, 2007
                                                
Future cash inflows from production $75,201  $34,162  $52,775  $162,138  $132,450  $93,046  $35,020  $45,566  $306,082  $468,220  $159,078  $29,845 
Future production costs  (17,888)  (7,193)  (16,780)  (41,861)  (15,707)  (16,022)  (18,270)  (11,990)  (61,989)  (103,850)  (10,408)  (1,529)
Future devel. costs  (3,491)  (3,011)  (1,578)  (8,080)  (11,516)  (8,263)  (4,012)  (3,468)  (27,259)  (35,339)  (8,580)  (1,175)
Future income taxes  (19,112)  (8,507)  (12,221)  (39,840)  (74,172)  (26,838)  (5,796)  (15,524)  (122,330)  (162,170)  (39,575)  (13,600)
  
Undiscounted future net cash flows  34,710   15,451   22,196   72,357   31,055   41,923   6,942   14,584   94,504   166,861   100,515   13,541 
10 percent midyear annual discount for timing of estimated cash flows  (17,204)  (4,438)  (9,491)  (31,133)  (14,171)  (17,117)  (2,702)  (4,689)  (38,679)  (69,812)  (64,519)  (7,779)
  
Standardized Measure Net Cash Flows
 $17,506  $11,013  $12,705  $41,224  $16,884  $24,806  $4,240  $9,895  $55,825  $97,049  $35,996  $5,762 
  
At December 31, 2006
                                                
Future cash inflows from production $48,828  $23,768  $38,727  $111,323  $97,571  $70,288  $30,538  $36,272  $234,669  $345,992  $104,069  $20,644 
Future production costs  (14,791)  (6,750)  (12,845)  (34,386)  (12,523)  (13,398)  (16,281)  (10,777)  (52,979)  (87,365)  (7,796)  (2,348)
Future devel. costs  (3,999)  (2,947)  (1,399)  (8,345)  (9,648)  (6,963)  (2,284)  (3,082)  (21,977)  (30,322)  (7,026)  (1,732)
Future income taxes  (10,171)  (4,764)  (8,290)  (23,225)  (53,214)  (20,633)  (5,448)  (11,164)  (90,459)  (113,684)  (25,212)  (8,282)
  
Undiscounted future net cash flows  19,867   9,307   16,193   45,367   22,186   29,294   6,525   11,249   69,254   114,621   64,035   8,282 
10 percent midyear annual discount for timing of estimated cash flows  (9,779)  (3,256)  (7,210)  (20,245)  (10,065)  (12,457)  (2,426)  (3,608)  (28,556)  (48,801)  (40,597)  (5,185)
  
Standardized Measure Net Cash Flows
 $10,088  $6,051  $8,983  $25,122  $12,121  $16,837  $4,099  $7,641  $40,698  $65,820  $23,438  $3,097 
  

FS-73


Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Table VIIChanges in the Standardized Measure of Discounted
 Future Net Cash Flows From Proved Reserves

     The changes in present values between years, which can be significant, reflect changes in estimated proved-reserve quantities and prices and assumptions used in forecasting
production volumes and costs. Changes in the timing of production are included with “Revisions of previous quantity estimates.”

             
          Total 
          Consolidated 
          and Affiliated 
Millions of dollars Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies  Companies 
Present Value at January 1, 2007 $65,820  $26,535  $92,355 
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production costs  (34,957)  (4,084)  (39,041)
Development costs incurred  10,468   889   11,357 
Purchases of reserves  780   7,711   8,491 
Sales of reserves  (425)  (7,767)  (8,192)
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery less related costs  3,664      3,664 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  (7,801)  (1,333)  (9,134)
Net changes in prices, development and production costs  74,900   23,616   98,516 
Accretion of discount  12,196   3,745   15,941 
Net change in income tax  (27,596)  (7,554)  (35,150)
 
Net change for the year  31,229   15,223   46,452 
 
Present Value at December 31, 2007 $97,049  $41,758  $138,807 
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production costs  (43,906)  (5,750)  (49,656)
Development costs incurred  13,682   763   14,445 
Purchases of reserves  233      233 
Sales of reserves  (542)     (542)
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery less related costs  646   83   729 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  37,853   3,718   41,571 
Net changes in prices, development and production costs  (169,046)  (51,696)  (220,742)
Accretion of discount  17,458   5,976   23,434 
Net change in income tax  72,234   14,889   87,123 
 
Net change for 2008  (71,388)  (32,017)  (103,405)
 
Present Value at December 31, 2008 $25,661  $9,741  $35,402 
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production costs  (27,559)  (4,209)  (31,768)
Development costs incurred  10,791   335   11,126 
Purchases of reserves         
Sales of reserves  (285)     (285)
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery less related costs  3,438   697   4,135 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  3,230   (4,343)  (1,113)
Net changes in prices, development and production costs  51,528   30,915   82,443 
Accretion of discount  4,282   1,412   5,694 
Net change in income tax  (20,810)  (7,312)  (28,122)
 
Net change for 2009  24,615   17,495   42,110 
 
Present Value at December 31, 2009 $50,276  $27,236  $77,512 
 

     The changes in present values between years, which can be significant, reflect changes in estimated proved-reserve quantities and prices and assumptions used in forecasting

production volumes and costs. Changes in the timing of production are included with “Revisions of previous quantity estimates.”



                           
  Consolidated Companies  Affiliated Companies 
Millions of dollars 2008   2007  2006  2008   2007  2006 
        
Present Value at January 1
 $97,049   $65,820  $84,287  $41,758   $26,535  $26,769 
        
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production costs  (43,906)   (34,957)  (32,690)  (5,750)   (4,084)  (3,180)
Development costs incurred  13,682    10,468   8,875   763    889   721 
Purchases of reserves  233    780   580       7,711   1,767 
Sales of reserves  (542)   (425)  (306)      (7,767)   
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery less related costs  646    3,664   4,067   83        
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  37,853    (7,801)  7,277   3,718    (1,333)  (967)
Net changes in prices, development and production costs  (169,046)   74,900   (24,725)  (51,696)   23,616   (837)
Accretion of discount  17,458    12,196   14,218   5,976    3,745   3,673 
Net change in income tax  72,234    (27,596)  4,237   14,889    (7,554)  (1,411)
        
Net change for the year  (71,388)   31,229   (18,467)  (32,017)   15,223   (234)
        
Present Value at December 31
 $25,661   $97,049  $65,820  $9,741   $41,758  $26,535 
        

FS-74


EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Chevron Corporation, dated May 30, 2008, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 3.2 By-Laws of Chevron Corporation, as amended January 30, 2008, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated February 1, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 4.1 Pursuant to the Instructions to Exhibits, certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the company and its consolidated subsidiaries are not filed because the total amount of securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. A copy of such instrument will be furnished to the Commission upon request.
 4.2* Confidential Stockholder Voting Policy of Chevron Corporation (page E-3).
 10.1* Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan (pages E-4 to E-16).
 10.2* Chevron Incentive Plan (pages E-17 to E-30).
 10.3* Long-Term Incentive Plan of Chevron Corporation (pages E-31 to E-57).
 10.4 Chevron Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Management Employees, as amended and restated on December 7, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated December 7, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.5* Chevron Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Management Employees II (pages E-58 to E-71).
 10.6* Chevron Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan (pages E-72 to E-98).
 10.7* Chevron Corporation ESIP Restoration Plan (pages E-99 to E-120).
 10.8 Texaco Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, adopted May 9, 1989, as amended May 13, 1993, and May 13, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.9 Supplemental Pension Plan of Texaco Inc., dated June 26, 1975, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.10 Supplemental Bonus Retirement Plan of Texaco Inc., dated May 1, 1981, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.11 Texaco Inc. Director and Employee Deferral Plan approved March 28, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.12 Chevron Corporation 1998 Stock Option Program for U.S. Dollar Payroll Employees, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.13* Summary of Chevron Incentive Plan Award Criteria (pages E-121 to E-122).
 10.14 Chevron Corporation Change in Control Surplus Employee Severance Program for Salary Grades 41 through 43, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated December 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.15 Chevron Corporation Benefit Protection Program, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated December 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.16 Form of Notice of Grant under the Chevron Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Chevron’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated June 29, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.17 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement under the Chevron Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Chevron Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.18 Form of Retainer Stock Option Agreement under the Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Chevron’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated June 29, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.19* Form of Stock Units Agreement under Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan (page E-123).
 12.1* Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(page E-124).

FS-77


EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No.
 Description
 
 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Chevron Corporation, dated May 30, 2008, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 3.2 By-Laws of Chevron Corporation, as amended January 30, 2008, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated February 1, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 4.1 Pursuant to the Instructions to Exhibits, certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the company and its consolidated subsidiaries are not filed because the total amount of securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. A copy of such instrument will be furnished to the Commission upon request.
 4.2 Confidential Stockholder Voting Policy of Chevron Corporation, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.1 Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.2 Chevron Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.3 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Chevron Corporation, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.4 Chevron Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Management Employees, as amended and restated on December 7, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated December 7, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.5 Chevron Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Management Employees II, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.6 Chevron Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.7 Chevron Corporation ESIP Restoration Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.8 Texaco Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, adopted May 9, 1989, as amended May 13, 1993, and May 13, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.9 Supplemental Pension Plan of Texaco Inc., dated June 26, 1975, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.10 Supplemental Bonus Retirement Plan of Texaco Inc., dated May 1, 1981, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.11 Texaco Inc. Director and Employee Deferral Plan approved March 28, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.12 Summary of Chevron Incentive Plan Award Criteria, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.13 Chevron Corporation Change in Control Surplus Employee Severance Program for Salary Grades 41 through 43, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated December 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.14 Chevron Corporation Benefit Protection Program, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Chevron Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated December 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.15* Form of Grant Agreement under the Long-Term Incentive Plan of Chevron Corporation.
 10.16* Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement under the Long-Term Incentive Plan of Chevron Corporation.


E-1


     
Exhibit No.
 Description
 
 10.17* Form of Retainer Stock Option Agreement under the Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan.
 10.18 Form of Stock Units Agreement under the Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Chevron Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 10.19* Employment Agreement, dated October 3, 2002, between Chevron Corporation and Charles A. James.
 10.20* Termination Agreement, dated January 5, 2010, between Chevron Corporation and Charles A. James.
 12.1* Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(page E-22).
 21.1* Subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation (pagesE-23 throughE-24).
 23.1* Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP(page E-25).
 24.1 to 24.12* Powers of Attorney for directors and certain officers of Chevron Corporation, authorizing the signing of the Annual Report onForm 10-K on their behalf.
 31.1* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Chief Executive Officer(page E-38).
 31.2* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Chief Financial Officer(page E-39).
 32.1* Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Chief Executive Officer(page E- 40).
 32.2* Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Chief Financial Officer(page E- 41).
 99.1* Definitions of Selected Energy and Financial Terms (pages E- 42 throughE-44).
 101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
 101.SCH* XBRL Schema Document
 101.CAL* XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
 101.LAB* XBRL Label Linkbase Document
 101.PRE* XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
 101.DEF* XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
Attached as Exhibit No.
Description
21.1*Subsidiaries101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Users of Chevron Corporation (pagesthis data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T ofE-125Regulation S-T toE-127).
23.1*Consentthat the interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP(page E-128).
24.1 to 24.13*Powersa registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Attorney for directors and certain officers of Chevron Corporation, authorizing the signingsection 11 or 12 of the Annual Report onForm 10-K on their behalf (pages E-129 to E-141).
31.1*Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationSecurities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the company’s Chief Executive Officer(page E-142).
31.2*Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and is otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the company’s Chief Financial Officer(page E-143).
32.1*Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Chief Executive Officer(page E-144).
32.2*Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Chief Financial Officer(page E-145).
99.1*Definitions of Selected Energy and Financial Terms (pagesE-146 toE-148).
100.INS*XBRL Instance Document
100.SCH*XBRL Schema Document
100.CAL*XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
100.LAB*XBRL Label Linkbase Document
100.PRE*XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
100.DEF*XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
XBRL-related documents is “unaudited” or “unreviewed.”
 
 
*Filed herewith.
 
Copies of above exhibits not contained herein are available to any security holder upon written request to the Corporate Governance Department, Chevron Corporation, 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon, California94583-2324.

E-2