UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 28, 2002July 2, 2004

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                          to                          .

Commission File Numberfile number 1-8703

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

(Exact nameName of registrantRegistrant as specifiedSpecified in its charter)Its Charter)
   
Delaware
 33-0956711
(State or other jurisdictionOther Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)Organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
20511 Lake Forest Drive
Lake Forest, California
 
92630
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 672-7000

Registrant’s Web Site: http://www.westerndigital.com
Securities Registered Pursuantregistered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Name of each exchange
Title of each class:classon which registered:registered


Common Stock, $.01 Par Value Per Share
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock
 New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange

Securities Registered Pursuantregistered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant:registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes x     No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

     As of September 20, 2002,Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).     Yes x     No o

     The aggregate market value of the votingregistrant’s common stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates of the Registrantregistrant on December 26, 2003, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $795.5 million.approximately $2.3 billion.

     As of September 20, 2002, the numberclose of outstandingbusiness on August 27, 2004, 204,765,871 shares of Common Stock,common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant was 193,215,334.were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

     Information required by Part III is incorporatedincorporates by reference to portions ofcertain information from the Registrant’s Proxy Statementregistrant’s definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) for the 20022004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the 20022004 fiscal year. Except with respect to information specifically incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, the Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part hereof.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Controls and Procedures
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 10.10
EXHIBIT 10.11
EXHIBIT 10.36
EXHIBIT 10.36.1
EXHIBIT 10.36.2
EXHIBIT 10.36.3
EXHIBIT 10.47.7
EXHIBIT 10.55
EXHIBIT 21
EXHIBIT 23
EXHIBIT 99.1
EXHIBIT 99.2
EXHIBIT 99.3
EXHIBIT 99.4


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 28, 2002July 2, 2004
       
Page

PART I
 Business  3 
 Properties12
Item 3.Legal Proceedings  13 
 Legal Proceedings13
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  13 
PART II
 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities14
Selected Financial Data  15 
 Selected Financial Data15
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  1615 
 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  2932 
 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  3134 
 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  5756
Controls and Procedures56
Other Information56 
PART III
 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant  5756 
 Executive Compensation  5756 
 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters56
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions  57 
 Certain RelationshipsPrincipal Accountant Fees and Related Transactions57
Item 14.Controls and ProceduresServices  57 
PART IV
 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K  57 
Signatures  6361 
CertificationEXHIBIT 3.3
EXHIBIT 10.17
EXHIBIT 10.20
64EXHIBIT 10.28
EXHIBIT 21
EXHIBIT 23
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

     The Company has a 52 or 53-weekTypically, the Company’s fiscal year. In order to align its manufacturing and financial calendars, effective during the three months ended December 31, 1999, the Company changed its fiscal calendar so that each fiscal monthyear ends on the Friday nearest to June 30 and consists of 52 weeks. However, approximately every six years, the last day of theCompany reports a 53-week fiscal year to align its fiscal quarters with calendar month. Priorquarters by adding a week to this change, the Company’sits fourth fiscal monthquarter. The 2004 fiscal year, which ended on the Saturday nearest to the last dayJuly 2, 2004, consisted of the calendar month. The change did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. The53 weeks. Fiscal years 2003 and 2002, 2001 and 2000 fiscal yearswhich ended on June 28, June 29,27 and June 3028, respectively, and consisted of 52 weeks each.were each 52-week years.

     Unless otherwise indicated, references herein to specific years and quarters are to the Company’s fiscal years and fiscal quarters, and references to financial information are on a consolidated basis.

     The Company is a Delaware corporation that operates as the parent company of its hard disk drive business, Western Digital Technologies, Inc., which was formed in 1970.

     The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 20511 Lake Forest Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630. The Company’s telephone number is (949) 672-7000 and its web site is http://www.westerndigital.com. The information on the Company’s web site is not incorporated in this report.

     Western Digital®, the Western Digital logo, WD Caviar®, WD Raptor® and WD Protégé® are trademarks of Western Digital Technologies, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All other trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners.

2


PART I

Item 1.BusinessBusiness

General

     Western Digital Corporation (the “Company” or “Western Digital”) designs, develops, manufactures and markets hard disk drives, featuring leading-edge technology.one of the key components found in most computers and data storage subsystems. Hard disk drives are also found in a number of consumer electronics (“CE”) devices. A hard disk drive is a storage device found in most computers that stores data on one or more rotating magnetic disks that provideto allow fast access to non-volatile data that must be readily available to users of computers or other devices.for computing needs. The Company’s hard disk drives are used in desktop personal computers (“PCs”), enterprise servers, network attached storage devices, an expanding list of CE products such as video game consoles, personal/digital video recording devicesrecorders, satellite and satellitecable set-top boxes.boxes, and as external storage devices. The Company’s hard disk drive products currently include 1.0-inch high, 3.5-inch form factor drives with capacities ranging from 8 gigabytes (“GB”) to 200250 GB, nominal rotation speeds of 5400, 7200 and 720010,000 revolutions per minute (“RPM”), and theoffer interfaces including Enhanced Integrated Drive Electronics (“EIDE”) interface., Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (“SATA”), 1394/ FireWire/ i.LinkTM and Universal Serial Bus (“USB”). The Company sells its products worldwide to computer manufacturers for inclusion in their computer systems or subsystems, to CE manufacturers for inclusion into their devices, and to distributors, resellers and retailers. The Company’s hard disk drive products are currently manufactured in Malaysia and Thailand. For geographical financial data, see the Company’s consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and noteNote 9 thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company refers to market data available from TrendFOCUS, Inc. (“TrendFOCUS”) and Gartner/ Dataquest, Inc. (“Gartner”), both of which are leading market research and analysis firms that provide data regarding the hard disk drive industry.

Industry

     Western Digital’s primary business focus is the sale of hard disk drives to the desktop PC, enterprise and CE markets.

Desktop Personal Computer (“PC”)PC Market.According to TrendFOCUS, Inc. (“TrendFOCUS”) quarterly reports for 2002 and calendar year 2001, the desktop computer segment is the largest segment of the worldwide personal computer market, accounting for approximately 75% of global personal computer shipments in 2002. As a result, according to TrendFOCUS, desktop computers were the leading source of demand for hard drives, accounting for more than 71% of all hard drive units shipped worldwide in 2002. Over 89% of Western Digital’s hard drive unit shipments in 2002 were sold to this market. Desktop personal computers for entry level to experienced users are used in both commercial and consumer environments. The demand for both hard drive capacity and unit volume of hard drives continues to grow in part due to:

• continued improvements in desktop computing price to performance ratios;
• continued growth of the sub-$1,000 PC market;
• the rapid accumulation of data resulting from the digitization of information previously stored in paper form;
• larger file sizes created by multimedia-intensive applications such as high-fidelity audio and video;
• the exchange of increasing volumes of digital content among users across the Internet and intranets with the proliferation of collaborative computing and sharing of audio and video content; and
• the availability of broadband connectivity.

     According to a March 2002 report published by TrendFOCUS, the worldwide desktop PC hard drive market (excluding emerging markets) was forecasted to grow from approximately 142 million units in calendar year 2001 to approximately 177 million units in calendar year 2005, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 6%. Revenue growth is expected to be lower due to the impact of severe price competition. TrendFOCUS also forecasted that revenue from sales of desktop PC hard drives would grow from approximately $13 billion in calendar year 2001 to approximately $14 billion in calendar year 2005, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 2%.

     Desktop PC’sPCs are used in a number of environments, ranging from homes to businesses and multi-user networks. Software applications are used on desktop PC’s primarilyPCs for word processing, spreadsheet, desktop publishing, database management, multimedia, entertainment and other related applications. Hard disk drives store theseboth software applications and the data used by these software applications. Desktop PC’s typically

3


utilizeThe Company believes that the EIDE interfacedemand for hard disk drives in the PC market has grown in part due to:

• the overall growth of PC sales;
• the increasing needs of businesses and individuals to store larger amounts of data on their PCs;
• the continuing development of software applications to manage multimedia content; and
• the increasing use of broadband Internet, including downloading content from the Internet onto desktop PC hard disk drives.

     TrendFOCUS estimates that the average capacityaggregate number of desktop PCs sold per desktop unitduring calendar year 2003 was 115 million units and will increase to 152 million units in calendar year 2001 was 29.1 GB, with 91%2008, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of all shipments in excess of 10GB in the desktop segment.

approximately 7%. The industry continues to supply increased capacity per unit as users’ system needs increase and technological and manufacturing advances continue to make higher capacity drives more affordable. In the mainstream desktop PC market, the Company believes that the rate of PC unit growth is being influenced by several factors, including maturing markets in North America and Western Europe, an increase in storage capacity per unit has outpacedfirst-time buyers in Eastern Europe and Asia, the ratelengthening of increase in user demand for such capacity in recent years. This will result in the Company changing its product mix, withPC replacement cycles and an increasing percentage of lower capacity, lower cost hard drives manufactured with fewer heads and disks per unit. The Company believes that even though unit demand will increase, this changing product mix will reduce the average selling price per hard drive unit in the desktop PC market, unless the rate of technology improvements decreases. In contrast to currently established markets, the emerging use of hard drives to record and play back audio and video content in the audio-video market is expected to create demandpreference for storage capacity at a rate that may exceed the growth in demand for increased capacity in the desktop PC market. Accordingly, the Company believes that time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality leadership with higher capacity drives at attractive price levels will continue to be critical to its future success in serving this market.

     Since 1997, the PC industry has experienced an increasing shift toward desktop PC’s priced below $1,000. TrendFOCUS estimates that approximately 67% of all desktop PC’s sold in 2002 were priced below $1,000. These systems typically incorporate lower cost components and, consequently, the average selling price for hard drives to this segment of the desktop PC market has also declined.

     The Company believes that two additional factors are impacting the growth of the PC market. First, the Company believes that the United States and Western European PC markets are nearing saturation. In addition, the Company believes that the cycle time in which existing PC owners replace their PC’s has lengthened from two to three years to approximately three to four years.notebook systems. For an additional discussion of changes in the PC market, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relatedFactors That May Affect Future Results.”

     According to TrendFOCUS quarterly reports for 2004 and calendar year 2003, the desktop PC segment is the largest market for hard disk drives, accounting for approximately 65% of global hard disk drive shipments in 2004. Approximately 90% of Western Digital’s hard disk drive unit shipments in 2004 were to this market. TrendFOCUS estimates that worldwide unit shipments of hard disk drives into this market will grow from approximately 178 million units in calendar year 2003 to approximately 232 million units in calendar year 2007, and that revenue will grow from

3


approximately $12 billion to approximately $14 billion during this period. This reflects compound annual growth rates for unit shipments and revenues of approximately 7% and 4%, respectively. Revenue growth is expected to be lower than unit growth due to the ongoing trend for lower cost PCs and competition within the industry. Although the average selling prices (“ASPs”) of hard disk drives are expected to continue to decline, the demand for overall product quality and reliability continues to increase.

     Most new desktop PC systems are equipped with high-speed external interfaces, such as 1394/ FireWire/ i.Link or USB. As a result, end users are able to supplement the storage space of their PC systems with the use of external hard disk drive industry in which we operate.”products that connect via these high-speed interfaces. These products are commonly used for storing additional programs or multimedia content, or for backing up internal hard disk drives.

     Emerging Markets.Mobile Computing Market.Future demand growth

     The mobile computing market, which includes notebook computers, is expected to grow faster than any other PC segment as performance and price continue to improve. TrendFOCUS estimates that sales of notebook systems comprised approximately 28% of the combined market for desktop computerPCs and notebook systems in 2003 and will increase to approximately 39% of the combined market in 2008, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 22%. Western Digital did not ship any hard disk drives to the mobile PC market during 2004. However, the Company has announced intentions to enter the mobile PC market with new, 2.5-inch form factor product offerings before the end of calendar year 2004.

Enterprise Market.

     The enterprise market for hard disk drives focuses on customers that make workstations, servers, network attached storage devices, storage area networks, and other computing systems or subsystems. This market has been traditionally served by hard disk drives that use the small-computer-systems-interface (“SCSI”) standard. Recently, however, SCSI hard disk drives are being replaced by SATA and EIDE hard disk drives in certain enterprise storage applications. SATA is an interface technology supported by industry standards. SATA hard disk drives cost less than SCSI, but offer improved reliability, scalability and performance over EIDE hard disk drives in enterprise environments. TrendFOCUS estimates that in calendar year 2004, approximately 30% of the enterprise hard disk drive market will utilize EIDE or SATA hard disk drives, and that this percentage will increase to 43% by 2007.

     One example of growth in the enterprise market is “near-line” storage. During the past few years, a new disk-based back-up market has emerged with high-capacity EIDE hard disk drives augmenting SCSI, tape and optical media. This new trend, popularly referred to as “near-line” storage, has become a growth market due to the ability of hard disk drives to back-up or access data more quickly than tape or optical solutions, and to quickly retrieve critical back-up or near-line data. The increasing use of hard disk drives in near-line storage applications is also may be drivenbeing enhanced by newthe availability of EIDE hard disk drive solutions, which are more cost competitive as compared to SCSI hard disk drives.

     In addition, EIDE drives are also being used in unique clustering applications for databases, scientific computation, web caching and emergingelectronic mail. This segment has become a significant market for large capacity EIDE hard drive markets, such asdisk drives, and the audio-video, video game consoleCompany believes that this segment will continue to consume a significant and tape replacement markets.growing portion of the Company’s highest capacity hard disk drives.

     According to a March 2002May 2004 report published by TrendFOCUS, the market for enterprise and other non-desktop PC applications of 3.5-inch form factor hard drive market wasdisk drives is forecasted to grow from approximately 433 million units in calendar year 20012003 to approximately 9383 million units in calendar year 2005,2007, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 118%26%. For an additional discussion of the non-desktop PC hard disk drive market, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

     Audio-Video Markets.Consumer Electronics Market.Traditionally, home users have “time shifted” television content by recording onto video tape by using a video cassette recorder (“VCR”) to view the content at a later time. This market is experiencing the introduction of an alternative to VCRs, where the video tape is being replaced by a

     Since 1999, hard drive that remains in the device. These harddisk drive-based recorders commonlyof audio and video content have been available for use in home entertainment systems. Commonly called personal video recorders (“PVRs”) or digital video recorders (“DVRs”), these consumer devices offer the end-user additionalenhanced features such as pausing live television, simplifying the process of recording and cataloging recorded television programs and quickly forwarding or rewinding to any section of a recorded television program. In addition, hard disk drives are being increasingly incorporated into DVD recorders to allow for PVR/DVR functionality and faster recording of content onto removable DVDs. New devices are being developed that are not available using VCRs. Hard drive technology makes it possible to simultaneously record generate, store

4


and play back content;audio, video, graphic images and other multimedia content. Gartner forecasts that unit shipments of hard disk drives into the audio-video market will grow from approximately 10 million units in calendar year 2003 to pause and skip forward and backward, while recording during live broadcasts; and to rapidly access large amountsapproximately 58 million units in calendar year 2008, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of audio-video content.

     Because the market for audio-video products using hard drives has not yet developed, it is too early to project the likely size and growth of such market.42%. For further discussion of this product development effort,the audio-video market, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

     Video Game Market.Another segment of the CE market is the inclusion of hard disk drives in electronic game devices. According to TrendFOCUS, home electronic game devices that include hard disk drives and that are played on home entertainment systems had sales of approximately 210 million units in calendar year 2001,2003, with an expected compound annual growth rate of approximately 82%14% through calendar year 2005. In calendar year 2001, Microsoft introduced a new game system called XboxTM that uses a hard disk drive for game use. Depending on the overall success2008. For an additional discussion of the current XboxTM architecture in thevideo game market, and perceived advantages due to incorporation of hard drive technology, overall hard drive sales may continue to increase with sales of XboxTM and other potential manufacturers of game consoles which integrate hard drives

4


into future designs. Seesee Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Tape Replacement Market. Traditional disaster recovery and back-up of enterprise data has been done primarily on tape media used in tape libraries, which are devices that enable rapid access to large volumes of data. During the past few years, a new data back-up market opportunity has started to develop with Integrated Drive Electronics (“IDE”)/ Advanced Technology Attachment (“ATA”) hard drives augmenting tape media. This new trend, referred to as “disk to disk back-up,” has become an emerging technology due to both the ability of hard drives to back up data more quickly than tape solutions and the overall cost reduction trend on IDE/ ATA class hard drives at a faster rate than tape cost reduction trends. While an insignificant part of the overall market in 2002, the use of IDE/ ATA drives as back-up and disaster recovery technology has seen significant attention and product introductions.

Small Computer System Interface (“SCSI”) Substitution. In certain circumstances, SCSI hard drives are being replaced by IDE/ ATA hard drives in enterprise storage applications. The Company believes that in calendar year 2002, approximately 10% of the enterprise drive market will utilize IDE/ serial ATA hard drives.

     Other Market Opportunities.

The Company continuously evaluates opportunities to apply its knowledge of data storage core competenciestechnology beyond traditionalcurrent markets for hard disk drives. Currently, newNew business opportunities are evaluated for their direct impact on the Company’s ability to increase the sale of hard disk drives. These opportunities include the design of hard drives for use in consumer devices, such as gaming devices or PVRs, and for use in higher-end computer applications, such as servers and server appliances. The Company monitors the development of new markets related to data or content storage and storage management, the transfer, use and storage of digital content and the continuing development of networking protocols, and may, from time to time, offer new products or services to address appropriate new form factors, interfaces or markets. Conversely, depending on the development of such markets and the Company’s ability to achieve its goals, the Company may, from time to time, withdraw from certain markets.

Products

     The Company offers a broad line of hard disk drives designed for various market segments. Western Digital’s products are marketed under the WD Caviar®, WD Protégé® and WD Raptor® brand names, and each product line is designed for a particular market segment. The Company’s WD Caviar®Caviar and WD ProtégéTM hard disk drive products are designed to serve distinct portions of the desktop PC market. WD Caviar ishard disk drives are designed for the advanced performance segment of the desktop PC market and the entry-level server market,and external storage markets, and WD Protégé ishard disk drives are designed for the value segment of the desktop PC market, the entry-level PC’sentry level PCs and the game console market. In addition,The WD Raptor hard disk drive is a SATA drive designed for the Company’s WD PerformerTM hard drive products are designed to serve the emerging audio-video portion of the hard drive market.enterprise storage market and high-end desktop PC applications.

     Desktop PC and Entry-Level Server Hard Disk Drive Products.The WD Caviar and WD Protégé hard disk drive families currently consist of 1.0-inch high, 3.5-inch form factor products with capacities ranging from 8 GB to 200250 GB and nominal rotation speeds of 5400 and 7200 RPM. These products utilize either the EIDE interface,or SATA interfaces, providing high performance while retaining ease of use and overall low cost of connection. The type of EIDE interface currently used in alla majority of the Company’s hard disk drives is ATA/100, which signifies a burst data transfer rate of 100 megabytes per second. The SATA interface available in certain of the Company’s WD Caviar Special EditionTM hard disk drives enable transfer rates as high as 150 megabytes per second. The Company also sells a line of external hard disk drives and related adapters whichthat are designed to accommodate external storage interfaces including 1394/ FireWire/i.LinkTM and Universal Serial Bus 2.0.USB. The 1394/ FireWire/i.LinkTM interface is a high speedhigh-speed interface that can be used to add additional external, portable storage capacity to a computer.desktop and laptop computers.

     Mobile Hard Disk Drive Products. Hard disk drives used in mobile products typically include 2.5-, 1.8- or 1.0-inch form factor drives. Although the desktop PC market accounts for a majority of hard disk drive sales, unit shipments of hard disk drives for the mobile market are increasing. TrendFOCUS forecasts that unit sales of hard disk drives to the mobile market will grow from approximately 50 million in calendar year 2003 to approximately 128 million in calendar year 2007, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 26%. The Company has announced intentions to enter the 2.5-inch mobile market before the end of calendar year 2004. In addition, the Company has indicated its plans to develop and bring to market smaller form factor drives.

Enterprise Hard Disk Drive Products. Western Digital product line generally leveragescurrently offers multiple products to address enterprise market needs, including the WD Raptor hard disk drive, a common platform10,000 RPM enterprise-class drive with the SATA interface, and the WD Caviar RAID Edition hard disk drive, a 7200 RPM drive manufactured to enterprise-class standards and equipped with either SATA or EIDE interfaces for various products within product families with different capacities to serve the differing market needs. This platform strategy results in commonality of components across different products within product families, which reduces exposure to changes in demand, facilitates inventory management and allows the Company to achieve lower costs through economies of scale purchasing. This platform strategy also enables computer manufacturer customers to leverage their qualification efforts onto successive product models. The Company expects to continue to utilize this platform strategy as it develops products for the emerging market for hard drives specifically designed for audio-video applications,primary storage such as new digitalengineering data management, document and image management, scientific computing, video recording devices.surveillance, web server, file server and near line storage.

5


     Non-PC Hard Disk Drive Products for Servers and External Storage. Western Digital’s products for server and external storage, such as network attached storage disk arrays (“NAS”) and storage area network disk arrays (“SAN”) currently consist of 3.5-inch form factor products with capacities ranging from 36.7 GB to 250 GB and nominal rotation speeds of 7200 and 10,000 RPM. The Company’s server and external storage products include the WD Raptor hard disk drive, equipped with the SATA interface, and the WD Caviar RAID Edition hard disk drive, equipped with either the SATA or EIDE interface.

Consumer Electronics Products.The Company offers customized design capabilities and unique hard disk drive technologies for consumer applications; however, where practical, the Company intends to leverage its existing product line architectures for the various products for the audio-video market.applications. The Company is currently offering the WD Performeroffers hard disk drive product lineproducts designed for use in consumer audio-video applications.applications such as PVRs and DVRs. It also offers products for the video game console market, such as the Microsoft® XboxTM. The Company is also developingand provides hard disk drives and products incorporating hard drive technology for other consumer electronics products including digital cable set-top boxes and audio-video jukeboxes.products.

Technology and Product Development

     Hard disk drives are used to record, store and retrieve digital data. Their performance attributes are currently better than removable or floppy disks, optical hard disk drives and tapes, and they are more cost effective than semiconductor technology. The primary measures of hard disk drive performance include:

      “Storage capacity” — the amount of data that can be stored on the hard disk drive — commonly expressed in gigabytes. As useddefined in the hard disk drive industry, a gigabyte means one billion bytes. A byte is a digital character, typically comprised of eight bits. A bit is a binary digit, the smallest unit of information in a digital system.
 
      “Average seek time” — the time needed to position the heads over a selected track on the disk surface — commonly expressed in milliseconds.
 
      “Internal data transfer rate” — the sustained rate at which data is transferred to and from the disk — commonly expressed in megabits per second. One megabit is equal to one million bits.
 
      “Spindle rotational speed” — the nominal rotational speed of the disks inside the hard disk drive — commonly expressed in RPMs, revolutions per minute or latency. While the reference to spindle rotational speeds of 5400, 7200 and 720010,000 RPMs is commonly used, in some cases these speeds are approximations.
 
      “Acoustics” — the sound intensity that is emitted while the hard disk drive is operating — commonly expressed in decibels.

     All of the Company’s hard disk drive products employ similar technology. The main components of the hard disk drive are the head disk assembly and the printed circuit board. The head disk assembly includes the head, media (disks), head positioning mechanism (actuator) and spin motor. These components are contained in a hard base plate protective package in a contamination-controlled environment. The printed circuit board includes both standard and custom integrated circuits, an interface connector to the host computer and a power connector.

     The head disk assembly is comprised of one or more disks positioned around a spindle hub that rotates the disks by a spin motor. Disks are made of a smooth substrate to which a thin coating of magnetic materials is applied. Each disk has a head suspended directly above it, which can read data from or write data to the spinning disk. The sensor element of the head, also known as the slider, is getting progressively smaller, requiring more accurate manufacturing processes.

     The integrated circuits on the printed circuit board typically include a drive interface and a controller. The drive interface receives instructions from the computer, while the controller directs the flow of data to or from the disks and controls the heads. The location of data on each disk is logically maintained in concentric tracks whichthat are divided into sectors. The computer sends instructions to the controller to read data from or write data to the disks based on track and sector locations. Guided by instructions from the controller, the head stack assembly is pivoted and swung across the disk by a head actuator or motor until it reaches the selected track of a disk, where the data is recorded or retrieved.

     Industry standard interfaces are utilized to allow the hard disk drive to communicate with the computer. Currently, the primary interface for desktop PC’sPCs is EIDE. Increasingly, work station computers are usingEIDE, and the EIDEprimary interface as well.for enterprise systems is SCSI. As computer performance continues to improve, the hard disk drive will need to deliver information faster than this interfacethese interfaces can handle. Accordingly, theThe Company believes that the desktop

6


PC industry plans to transition to higher speed interfaces, such as “serial ATA”SATA, to handle the higher data transfer rates. The Company currently offers its WD Caviar Special Edition SATA hard disk

6


drive, a 7200 RPM drive featuring capacities as large as 250 GB and designed for the high-end PC, workstation, server, and external storage markets. The Company believes that SATA is also becoming a more popular interface in the enterprise market. Western Digital currently offers its WD Raptor hard disk drive, a 10,000 RPM enterprise-class drive with the SATA interface, and the WD Caviar RAID Edition hard disk drive, a 7200 RPM drive manufactured to enterprise-class standards and available with a SATA interface. The Company is working to develop additional products that will support these higher speed interfaces.

     Storage capacity of the hard disk drive, as manufactured by Western Digital, is determined by the number of disks and each disk’s areal density, which is a measure of the amount of data that can be stored on the recording surface of the disk. Areal density is generally measured in megabits per square inch of disk surface. The higher the areal density, the more information can be stored on a single platter. As the areal density increases, fewer disks and/or heads are required to achieve a given drive capacity, thus reducing product costs through reduced component requirements.

     Head technology is one of the variables affecting areal density. Due toHistorically, there have been rapid technological changes, there have beenresulting in several generations of head technology in a relatively short period of time. However, in recent years the time has lengthened between changes in generations of head technology. Currently, the desktop hard disk drive industry uses giant magnetoresistive head technology, which allows significantly higher storage capacities than the previously utilized thin-film head technology. All of the Company’s hard disk drive product offerings currently employ giant magnetoresistive head technology.

     The Western Digital product line generally leverages a common platform for various products within product families with different capacities to serve the differing market needs. This platform strategy results in commonality of components across different products within product families, which reduces exposure to changes in demand, facilitates inventory management and allows the Company to achieve lower costs through economies of scale purchasing. This platform strategy also enables computer manufacturer customers to leverage their qualification efforts onto successive product models. The Company expects to continue to utilize this platform strategy as it continues to develop products for the emerging market for hard disk drives specifically designed for audio-video applications, such as digital video recording devices.

     Constant innovations in research and development are essential to the Company’s ability to compete. Hard disk drive providers, including Western Digital, are evaluating or implementing a number of technological innovations designed to further increase hard disk drive performance and reduce product costs, including simplifying the electronic architecture by combining the traditional controller, channel, microprocessor and servo-interface management functions of traditional hard drive microprocessors on a single integrated circuit. Moreover, to consistently achieve timely introduction and rapid volume production of new products, some hard drive providers, including the Company, are striving to simplify their product design processes by focusing on creating extendible core technology platforms which utilize common firmware and mechanical designs and reuse of manufacturing tooling and application-specific integrated circuits across various product generations and product lines.costs.

     For an additional discussion of technological innovations, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Sales and Distribution

     The Company sells its products globally to computersystem manufacturers, distributors, resellers, systems integrators and retailers. Manufacturers typically purchase components such as hard disk drives and assemble them into the computer systems they build. Distributors typically sell the Company’s drives to small computer manufacturers, dealers, systemsystems integrators and other resellers.

     Manufacturers.Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”).Sales to manufacturersOEMs accounted for 54%51%, 48%52%, and 55%54% of the Company’s revenuesrevenue in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. During 2002,2004, the Company’s major computer manufacturerOEM customers included Dell, Fujitsu, Gateway (including sales to E-Machines prior to its acquisition by Gateway in March 2004), Hewlett-Packard Microsoft, NEC and Trigem. Occasionally, revenuesIBM. Typically, revenue from sales to certain manufacturersOEMs account for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in a particular year.revenue. For example, during 2004, sales to Dell accounted for 14% of the Company’s revenue. During 2003, sales to Dell and Hewlett-Packard (including sales to Compaq Computer after its merger with Hewlett-Packard in 2002) accounted for 20% and 13% of revenue, respectively. During 2002, sales to Dell and Hewlett-Packard (including sales to Compaq Computercomputer prior to its merger with Hewlett-Packard in 2002) accounted for 15% and 13% of revenues,revenue, respectively. During 2001, sales to Dell and Compaq Computer accounted for 16% and 12% of revenues, respectively. During 2000, sales to Compaq Computer accounted for 21% of revenues. The Company believes that its success depends on its ability to maintain and improve its strong relationships with the leading computer manufacturers. Since 2000, Seagate Technology, Western Digital, and Maxtor (which merged with Quantum in 2000) and Seagate have had the highest market share with these manufacturers.

     In 2002, the top ten desktop personal computer manufacturers accounted for approximately 52% of all shipments in the desktop PC market. As a result, maintaining customer satisfaction with these leading computer manufacturers is critical.

     ComputerSystem manufacturers evaluate and select their hard disk drive suppliers based on a number of factors, including overall quality and reliability, storage capacities, performance characteristics, price, service and support, ease of doing

7


business, and the supplier’s long-term financial stability. They typically seek to qualify two or threemore providers for each generation of hard disk drives, and once a computer manufacturer has chosen its qualified hard

7


disk drive vendors for a given product, it generally will purchase hard disk drives from those vendors for the life of that product. To achieve success with computersystem manufacturers’ qualifications, a hard disk drive supplier must consistently offer hard disk drives featuring leading technology, quality, reliability and highacceptable capacity per disk. Suppliers must quickly achieve volume production of high quality and reliable hard disk drives. To quickly achieve high volume production, a hard disk drive supplier must have access to flexible, high-capacity, high-quality manufacturing capabilities.

     Many of the Company’s computer manufacturerOEM customers (also referred to as original equipment manufacturers or “OEMs”) have adoptedutilize just-in-time inventory management processes or supply chain business models that combine “build-to-order” (computer manufacturer does not build until there is a firm order) and “contract manufacturing” (computer manufacturer contracts assembly work to a contract manufacturer who purchases components and assembles the computer based on the computer manufacturer’s instructions). For certain key OEMs the Company maintains a base stock of several weeks, on average, of current, finished goods inventory in facilities located near or adjacent to the OEM’s operations. Inventory at these locations usually includes minor product customizations (such as labeling) for the related computer manufacturer. If subsequent to its initial order the computer manufacturer changes its requirements, inventory held at these facilities can be sold to other computer manufacturers or distributors “as is” or with minor modifications (such as a change in labeling) at little or no additional cost. Therefore, changes in an OEM’s requirements have minimal impact on inventory valuation.

     For an additional discussion of the need to adapt to customers’ business models and maintain customer satisfaction, refer to Part II, Item 7, under the headingsheading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate” and “Risk factors related to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

     Distributors.The Company uses a select group of distributors to sell its products to small computer manufacturers, resellers, dealers and systems integrators. TheDuring 2004, the Company’s major distributor customers includeincluded ASI, COS Distribution AG,Bell, eSys Distribution, Genuine, Ingram Micro, and Synnex.Tech Data. Distributors accounted for approximately 39%42%, 45%40%, and 38%39% of disk drive revenuesthe Company’s revenue for 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. Distributors generally enter into non-exclusive agreements for specific territories with the Company for purchase and redistribution of product on a quick turnover basis. Purchase orders are placed and revised on a weekly basis.product. The Company grants certain of its distributors limited price protection and limited rights to return product on an inventorystock rotation basis.rights.

     Retailers. The Company sells its retail-packaged products directly to a select group of major retailers such as computer superstores, warehouse clubs and computer electronics stores, and authorizes sales through distributors to smaller retailers. MajorDuring 2004, major retailers to whom the Company sellssold directly includeincluded Best Buy, Circuit City, CompUSA,Comp USA, Fry’s Electronics, and Sam’s Club.OfficeMax. Retailers accounted for approximately 7%, 8%, and 7% of revenuesthe Company’s revenue for each of 2004, 2003 and 2002, 2001 and 2000.respectively. The Company’s current retail customer base is primarily in the United States, Canada and Europe. The retail channel complements the Company’s other sales channels while helping to build brand awareness for the Company and its products. Retailers supply the aftermarket “upgrade” sectorand data back-up sectors in which end-users purchase and install products to upgrade their computers.computers and externally store their data for back-up purposes. The Company grants certain of its retailers price protection and limited rights to return product on an inventory rotation basis. The Company also sells its retail-packaged products through the Internet, at its website.web site.

     The Company maintains sales offices throughout North America, Eastern and Western Europe, the Middle East, Japan and Asia/ Pacific. Field application engineering is provided to strategic computer manufacturer accounts, and localized end-user technical support services are provided within the United States, Canada, Europe, and Europe.Asia. The Company’s localized end-user technical support is currently supplied by employees and a third party provider through telephone support, and via the Company’s website.web site.

     The Company’s international sales, which include sales to foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies but do not include sales to U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies, represented 50%63%, 47%59%, and 50% of revenuesthe Company’s revenue for 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. Sales to international customers may be subject to certain risks not normally encountered in domestic operations, including exposure to tariffs, various trade regulations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. See Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

8


     For additional information concerning revenue recognition, sales by geographic region and significant customer information, see Notes 1 and 9 respectively, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     The Company’s marketing and advertising functions are performed both internally and through an outside firm.firms. Advertising, worldwide packaging and marketing materials are targeted to various reseller and end-user segments. Western Digital utilizes both consumer media and, to a lesser extent, trade publications. The Company has programs under which qualifying distributors and retailers are reimbursed for certain marketing expenditures. Western Digital also maintains customer relationships by communicating with its resellers and providing end-users with pre-sale and post-sale information and support through its website.web site.

8


Competition

     InThe Company competes primarily with manufacturers of 3.5-inch hard disk drives for desktop, enterprise and CE systems. The Company’s competitors in the desktop hard disk drive market the Company has competed primarily withinclude Seagate Technology, Maxtor, Fujitsu, IBM, Maxtor, Quantum, SamsungHitachi Global Storage Technologies, and Seagate.Samsung. Over the last twofour years, the hard disk drive industry has experienced consolidation, decreasing the number of major competitors. In particular, Maxtor acquired the hard disk drive business of Quantum, Fujitsu exited the desktop hard disk drive market, and IBM exited the 5400 RPM segment of thesold its hard drive market, decreasing the number of major competitors. In addition, IBM announced in April 2002 that it will sell its harddisk drive business to a joint venture that is controlled by Hitachi Data Systems.Global Storage Technologies.

     The hard disk drive industry is intensely competitive, with hard disk drive suppliers competing for sales to a limited number of major customers. Hard disk drives manufactured by different competitors are highly substitutable due to the industry mandate of technical form, fit and function standards. Hard disk drive manufacturers compete on the basis of product quality and reliability, storage capacity, unit price, product performance, production volume capabilities, delivery capability, leadership in time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality, service and support, and ease of doing business. The relative importance of these factors varies between different customer and market segments. The Company believes that it is generally competitive in all of these factors.

     Based on quarterly reports published by TrendFOCUSThe Company believes that the markets in 2002which it competes, and calendar year 2001,those in which it plans to enter in the near future, such as the mobile market, are at or approaching high volume mass market, where market acceptance and consumer demand for products are strong. This represents a significant change in the industry. In prior years, the mobile, handheld and enterprise markets were relatively small with low volumes and high prices. As these markets continue to grow, consumers will demand lower cost points for the products that utilize these drives. As a result, it will be necessary for suppliers to offer high quality, reliable products at low cost to be able to effectively compete. The Company believes that its market share of the 3.5-inch IDE/ ATA market during 2002 increased approximately 6%, from approximately 15%model enables it to approximately 21%. In addition, the overall percentage of the desktop market held by Maxtor, Seagatedeliver products with superior quality and Western Digital, the top three desktop suppliers during 2002, increased from approximately 74% to approximately 86%.reliability at a low cost.

     The Company believes that there are no substantial barriers to entry for existing competitors to offer competing products. Therefore, the Company believes that it cannot differentiate its hard disk drive products solely on attributes such as storage capacity, buffer size or time-to-market. Accordingly, the Company also differentiates itself by focusing on high product quality and reliability, and designing and incorporating into its hard disk drives desirable product performance attributes, focusing onsuch as seek time, data transfer rates, intelligent caching, failure prediction, remote diagnostics, acoustics and data recovery. In addition, the Company emphasizes non-product related attributes, including rapid response with its computer manufacturer and distribution customers. Rapid response requires accelerated design cycles, customer delivery, production flexibility and timely service and support, which contribute to customer satisfaction. The Company also relies on the strength of the Western Digital brand name with value-added resellers and solution providers to whom the Company sells its hard disk drive products directly and indirectly. The Company believes that trust in a manufacturer’s reputation and the establishment of strategic relationships have become important factors in the selection of a hard disk drive, particularly within such a rapidly changing technology environment.

     The desktop hard drive market is characterized by several large competitors and short product life cycles; therefore, it has traditionally been subject to periods of sustained and severe price competition, and factors such as time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality can have a pronounced effect on the success of any particular product.

     Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products that have better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than the Company’s hard disk drive products. High-speed semiconductor memory could compete with the Company’s hard disk drive products in the future. Semiconductor memory is much faster than magnetic hard disk drives, but currently is not competitive from a cost

9


standpoint. Flash memory, a nonvolatilenon-volatile semiconductor memory, is currently much more costly and, while it has higher “read” performance than hard disk drives, it has lower “write” performance. Flash memory could become competitive in the near future for applications requiring less storage capacity than that provided by hard disk drives.

     For an additional discussion of competition, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Service and Warranty

     Western Digital generally warrants its newly manufactured hard disk drives against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one to threefive years from the date of sale. The Company’s warranty obligation is generally limited to repair or replacement of the hard disk drive. The Company has engaged third parties in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Hungary, India, Korea, Russia, Singapore, and Singaporethe United Arab Emirates to process and testprovide various levels of testing, processing and/or recertification of returned hard disk drives for the Company’s customers. In addition, the Company has contracted with a third party in Canada to processprocesses, tests and recertifies returned hard disk drives and until recently had engaged a third party to perform a similar serviceat its own facility in the United States. However, in July 2002, Western Digital assumed the processing and testing of hard drives in the United States and terminated the outsourcing of this function to the third party. In 2003, the Company has engaged third parties in Korea and Brazil to process and test returned hard drives. The Company has contracts with third parties to refurbish or repair its products at service facilities located in Singapore and Germany.

9


Manufacturing

     To be competitive, Western Digital must manufacture high quality hard disk drives with industry leading time-to-volume production at competitive unit costs. The Company strives to maintain manufacturing flexibility and high manufacturing yields, while insisting that its suppliers provide high-quality components at competitive prices. The critical elements of Western Digital’s hard disk drive production are high volume, low cost assembly and testing, and establishment and maintenance of key vendor relationships. By establishing partner relationships with its strategic component suppliers, the Company believes it is able to access “best-of-class” manufacturing quality without the substantial capital investment associated with actual vertical integration.quality. In addition, the Company believes that its sourcing strategy currently enables it to have the business flexibility needed to select the highest quality low cost suppliers as product designs and technologies evolve.

     Hard disk drive manufacturing is a complex process involving the assembly of precision components with narrow tolerances and extensive testing to ensure reliability.thorough testing. The assembly process occurs in a “clean room” environment whichthat demands skill in process engineering and efficient utilization of the “clean room” layout in order to reduce the high operating costs of this manufacturing environment. The Company’s clean room manufacturing process consists of modular production units, each of which contains a number of work cells.

     The Company produces hard disk drives in two plants, one in Malaysia and one in Thailand. The Company continually evaluates its manufacturing processes in an effort to increase productivity, sustain and improve quality and decrease manufacturing costs. For example, in order to improve efficiency and reduce costs, the Company closed two manufacturing facilities in Singapore during 1999 and 2000 and relocated its hard disk drive production to Malaysia. During 2002, in response to an increase in demand and in order to capitalize on the local supplier base, the Company completed the acquisition of a Thailand manufacturing facility. The Company continually evaluates which steps in the manufacturing process would benefit from automation and how automated manufacturing processes can improve productivity and reduce manufacturing costs. Currently,

     In July 2003, the Company purchasespurchased substantially all of the standard mechanical componentsassets of Read-Rite Corporation, formerly one of the Company’s suppliers of heads, including its wafer fabrication equipment in Fremont, California and micro controllersits slider fabrication facility in Bang Pa-In, Thailand. The Company uses these facilities to design and manufacture a substantial portion of the head gimbal assemblies (“HGAs”) and head stack assemblies (“HSAs”) for itsuse in hard disk drives from external suppliers.it manufactures.

     For an additional discussion of manufacturing, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

10


Research and Development

     The Company devotes substantial resources to development of new products and improvement of existing products. The Company focuses its engineering efforts on coordinating its product design and manufacturing processes in order to bring its products to market in a cost-effective and timely manner. Research and development expenses for continuing operations totaled $120.1, $113.4$201 million, $135 million and $150.7$120 million in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively.

     For afurther discussion of product development, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Materials and Supplies

     The principal components currently used in the manufacture of the Company’s hard disk drives are magnetic heads and related head stack assemblies,HSAs, media, controllers, spindle motors and mechanical parts used in the head disk assembly. In addition to custom semiconductor devices, the Company also uses standard semiconductor components such as logic, memory and microprocessor devices obtained from other manufacturers and a wide variety of other parts, including connectors, cables, and other interconnect technology.

     Unlike someThe Company designs and manufactures a substantial portion of its competitors, the heads required for the hard disk drives it manufactures. The Company also purchases a portion of these components from third party suppliers. During 2004, the Company bought giant magnetoresistive heads from ALPS Electric Co., Ltd. and TDK Corporation’s subsidiary, SAE Magnetics Ltd.

10


     The Company acquires all of the remaining components for its products from third party suppliers. In general, theThe Company tries to have multiple suppliers for each of its component requirements. For example, during 2004, the Company currently buys giant magnetoresistive heads from ALPS Electric Co., Ltd., Read-Rite Corporation and SAE Magnetics Ltd. MediaCompany’s media requirements arewere purchased from several outside vendors including Fuji Electric Company Ltd., Komag, Showa Denko KK and Trace Storage Technology Corporation; however, theCorporation. The Company has a volume purchase agreement with Komag. Under this agreement,Komag under which expires in April 2005, the Company is obligated to purchase a substantial percentage of its requirements for hard disk media from Komag as long as Komag’s prices, technology and quality remain competitive. In August 2001, Komag announced

     Although the Company tries to have multiple suppliers for each of its voluntary filing for Chapter 11 reorganization, and in July 2002 announced that it had completed its bankruptcy reorganization. Komag continued its operations during the Chapter 11 process. Komag Malaysia, a separate subsidiary which did not file Chapter 11, is the manufacturing entity which supplies Komag’s share of the Company’s media requirements.

     Somecomponent requirements, some components are currently sole-sourced. For example, some custom integrated circuitscircuit devices are currently sole-sourced from STMicroelectronics, IBM and IBM.Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. The Company has aentered into volume purchase agreementagreements with IBM and Marvell to purchase the major portion of its read channel chipscustom integrated circuit devices at negotiated quantities and prices. Because of their custom nature, these products require significant design-in periods and long lead times. There has been a trend in integrated circuit design toward increased integration of various separate circuits. The Company expects this trend to continue in the area of custom integrated circuits for hard disk drives.

     For an additional discussion of component supplies, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Backlog

     Historically, a substantial portion of the Company’s orders has been for shipments within 30 to 60 days of the placement of the order. The Company generally negotiates pricing, order lead times, product support requirements and other terms and conditions prior to receiving a computer manufacturer’s first purchase order for a product. Customers’ purchase orders typically may be canceled with relatively short notice to the Company, with little or no cost to the customer, or modified by customers to provide for delivery at a later date. In addition, certainmany of the Company’s sales to computer manufacturersOEMs are made under just-in-time delivery contracts that do not generally require firm order commitments by the customer until the time of sale. Instead, the Company receives a periodic forecast of requirements from the customer, and the customer is invoiced upon shipment of the product from the just-in-time warehouse. Therefore, backlog information as of the end of a particular period is not necessarily indicative of future levels of the Company’s revenue and profit and may not be comparable to earlier periods.

11


Patents, Licenses and Proprietary Information

     The Company owns numerous patents and has many patent applications in process. The Company believes that, although its patents and patent applications have considerable value, the successful manufacturing and marketing of its products depends primarily upon the technical competence and successful trainingmanagerial competence of its personnel. Accordingly, the patents held and applied for do not assure the Company’s future success.

     In addition to patent protection of certain intellectual property rights, the Company considers elements of its product designs and processes to be proprietary and confidential. The Company believes that its nonpatentednon-patented intellectual property, particularly some of its process technology, is an important factor in its success. Western Digital relies upon non-disclosure agreements and contractual provisions and a system of internal safeguards to protect its proprietary information. Despite these safeguards, there is a risk that competitors may obtain and use such information. The laws of foreign jurisdictions in which the Company conducts business also may provide less protection for confidential information than the United States.

     The Company relies on certain technology that is licensed from other parties in order to manufacture and sell its products. The Company believes that it has adequate cross-licenses and other agreements in place in addition to its own intellectual property portfolio to compete successfully in the hard disk drive industry.

     For additional discussion of intellectual property, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Environmental Regulation

     The Company is subject to a variety of regulations in connection with its operations. It believes that it has obtained or is in the process of obtaining all necessary environmental permits for its operations.

11


Employees

     As of June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, the Company employed a total of 9,55017,376 employees worldwide. This represents an increase in headcount of approximately 21%51% since June 29, 200127, 2003 and an increase of approximately 30%82% since June 30, 2000.28, 2002. The increase is primarily the result of the Company’s acquisition of Read-Rite’s assets in July 2003 and the purchase of a manufacturing facility in Thailand during 2002 in response to an increase in unit sales. The Company employed 1,058 employees in the United States, 6,676 employees in Malaysia, 1,716 employees in Thailand, 19 employees in Singapore and 81 employees at its international sales offices as of June 28, 2002.

     Many of the Company’s employees are highly skilled, and the Company’s continued success depends in part upon its ability to attract and retain such employees. Accordingly, the Company offers employee benefit programs, which it believes are at least equivalent to those offered by its competitors. Despite these programs, the Company has, along with most of its competitors, experienced difficulty at times in hiring and retaining certain skilled personnel. When the Company is unable to hire personnel in the ordinary course of business, it uses third parties to help satisfy its personnel needs. In addition, the Company has utilized consultants and contract personnel to fill these needs until full-time employees could be recruited. The Company has never experienced a work stoppage, none of its domestic employees are represented by a labor organization, and the Company considers its employee relations to be good.

Item 2.PropertiesAvailable Information

     During December 2000,The Company maintains an Internet web site at http://www.westerndigital.com. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available on the Company’s web site at http://www.westerndigital.com, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Any materials the Company relocated its corporate headquarters from Irvine, California to Lake Forest, California, signing a 10-year lease agreement forfiles with the Lake Forest facility. The lease forSEC are available at the Irvine facility expired in January 2001. The Company’s corporate headquarters houses management, research and development, administrative and sales personnel. The Company leases one facility in San Jose, California for research and development activities.SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Additional information about the operation of the Public Reference Room can also be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the Company currently leases one facility in Irvine, California, which was used in 2002 for researchSEC maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and development activities, but which is currently used as a processing centerinformation statements, and for light manufacturing. The San Jose lease expires in July 2006 andother information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Irvine lease expires in September 2010.SEC, including Western Digital owns a manufacturing facility in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and

12


acquired a smaller manufacturing facility in Pathumthani, Thailand in January 2002. The Company also leases office space in various other locations throughout the world primarily for sales and technical support.

     The Company believes its present facilities are adequate for its current needs, although the process of upgrading its facilities to meet technological and market requirements is expected to continue. New manufacturing facilities generally can be developed and become operational within approximately nine to eighteen months should the Company require such additional facilities.

During 2000, the Company sold approximately 34 acres of land in Irvine, California, upon which it had previously planned to build a new corporate headquarters, for $26 million (the approximate cost of the land). During 2000, the Company also sold its enterprise drive manufacturing facility in Tuas, Singapore for $11.0 million (for a gain of $3.1 million) and its Rochester, Minnesota enterprise research and development facility for $29.7 million (for a loss of $1.9 million).

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

See Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2002.Digital.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

     The names, ages and positions of all of the executive officers of the Company as of September 23, 2002August 27, 2004 are listed below, followed by a brief account of their business experience during the past five years. Executive officers are normally elected annually by the Board of Directors at a meeting of the directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. There are no family relationships among these officers nor any arrangements or understandings between any officer and any other person pursuant to which an officer was selected.

       
NameAgePosition



Matthew E. Massengill  4143  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Arif Shakeel  4749  President and Chief Operating Officer
D. Scott MercerRaymond M. Bukaty  5147Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Stephen D. Milligan41  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Charles W. Frank, Jr.54Vice President, Chief Technical Officer
Raymond M. Bukaty45Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Steven M. Slavin51Vice President, Taxes and Treasurer
David C. Fetah  4244  Vice President, Human Resources

     Mr. Massengill joined the Company in 1985 and has served in various executive capacities. From August 1999 until October 1999, he served as Co-Chief Operating Officer, and from October 1999 until January 2000, he served as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Massengill served as President of the Company from January 2000 until January 2002, and he was appointed Chief Executive Officer in 2000. He assumed the additional role of Chairman of the Board of Directors in November 2001.

     Mr. Shakeel joined the Company in 1985 as Product Manager, Integrated Drive Electronics. Mr. Shakeel served in various executive capacities, including Vice President, Materials — Asia,Materials-Asia, until October 1997, when he left the Company to become Managing Director of Mah LinMahlin Associates, a supplier of electromechanical components in Singapore. Mr. Shakeel rejoined the Company in April 1999 as Senior Vice President of Operations, Drive Products Division. He became Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations in July 1999. In February 2000, he became Executive Vice President and

12


General Manager of Hard Disk Drive Solutions. He was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in April 2001, and served in that position until promoted to his current position of President in January 2002.

     Mr. Mercer joined the Company in 1991 as Chief Financial Officer, and served in that position until 1996, when he left the Company to serve in various senior management positions at Dell Computer

13


Corporation. At Dell Computer, Mr. Mercer was a Vice President responsible for product development and product marketing for desktop and notebook product lines. He became Vice President, Finance of Dell Computer’s Relationship Group and was later appointed to Vice President, Finance U.K. Operations. Mr. Mercer rejoined the Company in 2001 as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer.

     Mr. Frank joined the Company in 1980 and has served in various engineering, marketing and senior management positions. He became Chief Technical Officer in January 2001.

     Mr. Bukaty joined the Company in 1999 as Vice President, Corporate Law. Mr. Bukaty was promoted to Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in March 2002.2002, and to Senior Vice President in March 2004. Prior to joining the Company, he worked at Fluor Corporation for three years, two as Assistant General Counsel and one as Senior Counsel. Prior to joining Fluor, he was a principal in the law firm of Riordan & McKinzie.McKinzie, which merged with Bingham McCutchen LLP in July 2003.

     Mr. SlavinMilligan joined the Company in 1986.September 2002 as Vice President, Finance. He was appointed Senior Vice President Taxesand Chief Financial Office in October 1990,January 2004. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Milligan served in a variety of senior finance capacities at Dell between April 1997 and elected Treasurer in July 1996.September 2002, including Assistant Controller, European Controller, North European Finance Director, Director of Finance for the Americas, and Controller for Dell Financial Services. Prior to joining Dell, he served twelve years at Price Waterhouse (now known as PricewaterhouseCoopers) as Audit and Account Manager for several large multinational companies.

     Mr. Fetah joined the Company in March 2000 as Vice President of Human Resources. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Executive Director, Human Resources, for PeopleSoft, Inc. Prior to joining PeopleSoft in 1996, he was Manager, Human Resources, for Fluor Corporation where he served for five years.

14Item 2.Properties

     The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in Lake Forest, California. The Lake Forest facilities include four buildings, consisting of an aggregate of 237,673 square feet, and house the Company’s management, research and development, administrative and sales personnel. Three of these buildings are subject to a 10-year lease that expires in December 2010, and the fourth is subject to a 9-year lease that expires in January 2012. In addition, the Company leases an approximately 181,000 square foot facility in Fremont, California that is used for head wafer fabrication and research and development. The lease expires in February 2008. The Company also leases approximately 151,000 square feet in San Jose, California for research and development activities. In addition, the Company leases one facility in Irvine, California, which consists of 59,213 square feet and is used as a processing center and for light manufacturing. The San Jose lease expires in July 2006 and the Irvine lease expires in September 2010. The Company also leases an aggregate of approximately 29,000 square feet of office space in various other locations throughout the world primarily for sales and technical support.

     Western Digital owns a 633,077 square foot manufacturing facility in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Company also owns a manufacturing facility in Pathumthani, Thailand, consisting of approximately 232,500 square feet. In addition, in July 2003 the Company acquired a facility in Bang Pa-In, Thailand, consisting of three buildings with an aggregate of 433,744 square feet, which is used for slider fabrication, the assembly of HGAs and HSAs, and research and development related thereto.

The Company believes its present facilities are adequate for its current needs, although the process of upgrading its facilities to meet technological and market requirements is expected to continue. New manufacturing facilities generally can be developed and become operational within approximately nine to eighteen months should the Company require such additional facilities.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

See Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004.

13


PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     Western Digital’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WDC.”“WDC”. The approximate number of holders of record of common stock of the Company as of September 10, 2002August 27, 2004 was 3,337.2,813.

     The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not intend to pay any cash dividends on common stock in the foreseeable future. The Company’s $125 million credit facility prohibits the Company from paying cash dividends on its common stock.

     The high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock, as reported by the NYSE, for each quarter of 20022004 and 20012003 are as follows:

                  
FirstSecondThirdFourth




2002
                
 High $4.06  $6.79  $7.75  $7.55 
 Low  1.95   2.15   5.20   3.07 
2001
                
 High $6.44  $6.81  $5.94  $5.58 
 Low  3.56   2.19   2.31   2.98 
                  
FirstSecondThirdFourth




2004
                
 High $14.00  $14.95  $13.55  $11.69 
 Low  8.44   10.20   9.64   7.87 
2003
                
 High $5.48  $8.96  $9.58  $13.05 
 Low  2.98   4.12   6.07   8.36 

The following table provides information about repurchases by the Company of its common stock during the quarter ended July 2, 2004:

                  
Total Number ofMaximum Value of
Shares Purchased asShares that May Yet
Total NumberPart of Publiclybe Purchased
of SharesAverage PriceAnnouncedUnder the
PurchasedPaid per ShareProgramProgram(3)




March 27, 2004 — April 23, 2004  282(1) $10.89     $ 
April 24, 2004 — May 28, 2004  1,927,000(1) $8.25   1,927,000  $84,102,250 
May 29, 2004 — July 2, 2004  10,724(2) $9.14     $ 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total  1,938,006  $8.26   1,927,000  $84,102,250 
   
   
   
   
 


(1) Represents shares purchased in open-market transactions.
(2) Represents shares delivered by an employee to the Company to satisfy tax-withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock.
(3) On May 5, 2004, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the Company to repurchase up to $100 million of the Company’s common stock in open market transactions. The program does not have an expiration date.

14


Item 6.Selected Financial Data

Financial Highlights

     The followingThis selected consolidated financial data should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes contained in conjunctionthis report and in our subsequent reports filed with Part II, Item 7.the SEC, as well as the section of this report and our other reports entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

                                    
Years EndedYears Ended


June 28,June 29,June 30,July 3,June 27,July 2,June 27,June 28,June 29,June 30,
2002200120001999199820042003200220012000










(in millions, except per share and employee data)(in millions, except per share and employee data)
Revenues, net $2,151.2 $1,953.4 $1,957.2 $2,767.2 $3,541.5 
Gross profit (loss) 281.6 207.7 9.6 (2.8) 100.1 
Revenue, netRevenue, net $3,047 $2,719 $2,151 $1,953 $1,957 
Gross marginGross margin 462 443 282 208 10 
Income (loss) from continuing operationsIncome (loss) from continuing operations 53.2 (74.6) (329.5) (472.5) (290.2)Income (loss) from continuing operations 151 182 53 (52) (330)
Per share income (loss) from continuing operations:Per share income (loss) from continuing operations: Per share income (loss) from continuing operations: 
Basic .74 $.93 $.28 $(.31) $(2.69)
Basic and diluted $.28 $(.44) $(2.69) $(5.28) $(3.32)Diluted $.70 $.89 $.28 $(.31) $(2.69)
Working capitalWorking capital $34.8* $45.4 $6.9 $131.4 $463.5 Working capital $270 $238 $37 $45 $7 
Total assetsTotal assets $636.7 $507.7 $613.0 $1,022.4 $1,442.7 Total assets $1,159 $866 $637 $508 $613 
Long-term debtLong-term debt $* $112.5 $225.5 $534.1 $519.2 Long-term debt $53 $ $ — $112 $226 
Shareholders’ equity (deficiency) $102.9 $6.8 $(109.8) $(153.8) $317.8 
Shareholders’ equity (deficit)Shareholders’ equity (deficit) $488 $327 $103 $7 $(110)
Number of employeesNumber of employees 9,550 7,909 7,321 10,503 13,286 Number of employees 17,376 11,508 9,550 7,909 7,321 


No cash dividends were paid for the years presented.

* The holders ofNo cash dividends were paid for the Company’s convertible debentures have the right to require the Company to redeem the debentures in February 2003 (a “put” right). Based on current forecasts that show the company continuing to generate positive cash flow from operations, the Company now intends to satisfy the majority, if not all, of its put obligations in cash instead of common stock. Accordingly, the debentures have been classified as a current liability at June 28, 2002. See years presented.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading Liquidity and Capital Resources, and Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

15


Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

     This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The statements that are not purely historical should be considered forward-looking statements. Often they can be identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “forecasts,” and the like. Statements concerning current conditions may also be forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current conditions. TheseExamples of forward-looking statements appearinclude, but are not limited to, statements concerning the growth of unit sales of desktop PCs; growth of unit shipments of hard disk drives in a numberthe desktop PC, CE (including audio-video), and mobile markets; growth of placesrevenue from sales of hard disk drives in this reportthe desktop PC market; increase in sales of notebook systems; growth rate of sales of home electronic game devices that include hard disk drives; increase in the demand for desktop PC hard disk drives in Asia; the Company’s expansion into the CE market; expansion of the SATA interface in desktop PCs and include statements regardinggrowth of EIDE and SATA interfaces in enterprise hard disk drives; growth of the intentions, plans, strategies, beliefs ormarket for enterprise and other non-desktop PC applications of 3.5-inch form factor hard disk drives; the Company’s entrance into the mobile hard disk drive market; the Company’s current expectations regarding depreciation expense for the head manufacturing operations, capital expenditures, gross margin percentages, cash conversion cycle, inventory turns, cash and cash equivalents, liquidity and cash flows; the impact of the Company with respect to, among other things:

• the financial prospects of the Company;
• litigation and other contingencies potentially affecting the Company’s financial position, operating results or liquidity;
• trends affecting the Company’s financial condition or operating results;
• the Company’s strategies for growth, operations, product development and commercialization; and
• conditions or trends in or factors affecting the computer, data storage, home entertainment or hard drive industry.
acquisition of head manufacturing assets on the Company’s long-term financial business model, operating income, working capital investments, and research and development expenses; and increase in areal density (the measure of storage per disk) and decrease in areal density growth rate.

     Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are urged to carefully review the disclosures made by the Company concerning risks and other factors that may affect the Company’s business and operating results, including those made under the headings “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate” and “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly”, in this report under the caption “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” as well as the Company’s other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,

15


which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

     Unless otherwise indicated, references herein to specific years and quarters are to the Company’s fiscal years and fiscal quarters.

Business Overview

     Western Digital designs, develops, manufactures and markets hard disk drives for digital information storage. The Company’s hard disk drives are used in desktop PCs, enterprise servers, network attached storage devices, an expanding list of CE products such as video game consoles, personal/digital video recorders and satellite and cable set-top boxes, and as external storage devices. Western Digital markets its hard disk drives directly to PC manufacturers, including large, brand name PC manufacturers such as Dell and Hewlett Packard; to CE manufacturers; and to distributors, resellers and retailers that serve a wide range of end users. Unless otherwise noted, all references to market share and industry data included in this discussion are according to the Gartner report published in April of 2004.

     Western Digital builds hard disk drives in assembly facilities in Malaysia and Thailand. The Company also builds hard disk drive components such as printed circuit board assemblies and head stack assemblies in its Malaysia and Thailand facilities. In July 2003, the Company acquired head manufacturing facilities in California and Thailand, and currently produces a significant portion of its head requirements. Western Digital procures other components from industry-leading technology companies, many of which work with the Company from design and development through manufacturing.

     Currently, eight hard disk drive vendors compete in the $22 billion-a-year hard disk drive market, compared to fifteen vendors in calendar year 2000. According to Gartner quarterly reports published in 2004 and calendar year 2003, Western Digital, Seagate Technology, Maxtor Corporation, and Hitachi Global Storage Technologies supplied approximately 80% of the total hard disk drive market during 2004.

     The Company focuses on providing quality products, superior customer service and flexibility by managing its technology deployment, manufacturing, cost, delivery, quality and reliability. Western Digital believes that its low cost business model allows it to access leading-edge component technologies and cost-saving innovations while minimizing investment expenditures.

     Western Digital’s growth will be influenced greatly by developments in the PC hard disk drive market. Gartner estimates that unit shipments of hard disk drives in the desktop PC market will grow by approximately 4% per year through calendar year 2008. The Company has increased its resources to address certain fast-growing geographic markets such as Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Russia. The Company’s revenue in Asia during 2004 increased to 29% of total revenue as compared to 22% of total revenue for 2003. Gartner estimates that demand for desktop PC hard disk drives in Asia will increase 12% per year through calendar year 2008.

     Because CE demand for hard disk drives is relatively new, with many consumer applications currently employing similar hard disk drive technology as is found in desktop PCs, Western Digital presently believes it can expand shipments into this developing market. As this market develops, additional investments by the Company may be required. Gartner estimates that unit shipments of 3.5-inch form factor hard disk drives in CE markets will grow by approximately 26% per year through calendar year 2008.

     The Company is also pursuing new revenue opportunities in non-PC, information technology (“IT”) applications through its application of the SATA interface. The SATA interface contains many of the same benefits of SCSI — the predominant interface currently used in most enterprise hard disk drive applications — at a lower cost. TrendFOCUS estimates that 43% of enterprise hard disk drive unit shipments will use the EIDE or SATA interface by calendar year 2007.

     In addition to the CE and SATA growth opportunities, the Company has plans to enter the mobile hard disk drive market in calendar year 2004 to provide hard disk drives for notebook PCs. Gartner forecasts that unit sales of 2.5-inch form factor hard disk drives to the mobile computing market will grow from an estimated 47 million in calendar year 2003 to approximately 97 million in calendar year 2008, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 15%.

16


Fiscal 2004 Overview

     According to quarterly reports for 2004 and calendar year 2003 from Gartner, the desktop hard disk drive market increased by approximately 17% based on unit shipments. Based on quarterly reports published by Gartner in 2004 and calendar 2003, the Company believes that its market share in desktop hard disk drives increased to 24% from 23% in 2003. While Western Digital’s unit shipments grew by 22% in 2004, the average selling price of its hard disk drives declined by 8% due to aggressive pricing pressures and mix of products.

     In 2004, Western Digital’s net revenue increased by 12%, to $3.0 billion, on unit shipments of 48.3 million. However, in 2004, gross margin decreased to 15.2% from 16.3% in 2003 primarily as a result of aggressive pricing pressures. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $50 million of start-up expenses and other charges related to the acquisition of substantially all the assets of Read-Rite Corporation (“Read-Rite”) in July 2003. These factors offset the ongoing positive contribution of the Company’s newly acquired head manufacturing operations. As a result, operating income decreased by $31.9 million, to $154.9 million, and operating margins decreased to 5.1% as a percentage of net revenue, compared with 6.9% in 2003. For 2005, the Company expects incremental benefits from its integrated head operations; however, it is not clear whether this will be enough to offset any continued downward pressure on gross margin caused by competitive pricing. Western Digital generated $190.0 million in cash flow from operations in 2004 and finished the year with $377.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $15.4 million from the prior year’s balance.

Read Rite Asset Acquisition

     In June 2003, Read-Rite, then one of the Company’s suppliers of magnetic recording heads, commenced voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. On July 31, 2003, Western Digital purchased substantially all of the assets of Read-Rite, including its wafer fabrication equipment in Fremont, California and manufacturing facility in Bang Pa-In, Thailand. The cost of the acquisition was $172.0 million and consisted of cash consideration of $94.8 million, assumed debt obligations of the Thailand operations of approximately $60.2 million, direct costs of the acquisition and other miscellaneous assumed obligations totaling $17.0 million. Proceeds from a $50 million term loan were used to repay obligations assumed as a result of the acquired head manufacturing operations in Thailand.

     Western Digital’s acquisition of the head manufacturing operations represented a fundamental change in the Company’s operating structure as the Company is now manufacturing heads for use in its hard disk drives. Previously, the Company purchased all of its recording head requirements from external suppliers, including Read-Rite. The Company acquired the Read-Rite assets for the following reasons:

• to enhance its financial business model,
• to gain better control of head technology as the Company’s business grows,
• to improve flexibility, product planning and quality, and
• to improve its cost structure and tighten its supply chain through better operational integration.

     Taking the asset acquisition into consideration, the Company expects its long-term financial business model to benefit from a higher gross margin percentage, offset by higher research and development expenses, than it otherwise would have had without the acquisition. The gross margin percentage improvement will result from lower cost of sales, as the Company develops the ability to manufacture heads at a lower cost than what it would have otherwise paid external suppliers. This is expected to result in higher operating income than it otherwise would have had without the acquisition.

     The Company began realizing these net financial benefits in 2004. However, these benefits were offset by downward pressures on gross margins caused by an aggressive pricing environment. The incremental benefits from an integrated head manufacturing operation are expected to increase as the Company continues to ramp its head manufacturing capability. The Company is currently satisfying a substantial portion of its head requirements through its own head manufacturing operations.

     As a result of integrating the head manufacturing operations, the Company carries a higher percentage of fixed costs than assumed in its prior financial business model. For example, depreciation expense for the head manufacturing operations is expected to be between $15 million and $20 million per quarter by the end of 2005.

17


     Capital expenditures and working capital investments required to support the head manufacturing operations will increase when compared to the Company’s prior financial business model. For example, capital expenditures related to the head manufacturing operations are expected to average between $80 million and $100 million on an annual basis after initial capital investments are completed. Also, inventory turns are expected to decrease to between 17 and 19 from the Company’s historical average of between 20 and 22.

The Company accounted for this transaction as an asset acquisition. The estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows:

     
Current assets $17.4 
Property and equipment  90.2 
Purchased technology  38.8 
In-process research and development  25.6 
   
 
  $172.0 
   
 

     As of the date of the acquisition, Read-Rite had two in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) projects: 120 gigabyte per platter and 160 gigabyte per platter products. The fair value allocated to these projects as part of the acquisition was $17.8 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The multi-period excess earnings method, a discounted cash flow income approach, was used to determine the value allocated to the IPR&D. The rate utilized to discount the cash flows to their present values was based on the weighted average cost of capital and an additional risk premium based on an analysis of the technology and the IPR&D stages of completion. Based on these factors, 27% was used as the annual discount rate. These acquired IPR&D projects had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, the Company recorded the $25.6 million as a charge to research and development expense at the time of the acquisition.

Results of Operations

Summary of 2004, 2003 and 2002 2001 and 2000 Comparison

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, items insummary information from the Company’s statements of operations expressed as a percentage of total revenue. This table and the following discussion exclude the results of the discontinued businesses.income (in millions).

               
Years ended

June 28,June 29,June 30,
200220012000



Revenues, net  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
 Cost of revenues  (86.9)  (89.4)  (99.5)
   
   
   
 
  Gross profit  13.1   10.6   0.5 
 Research and development  (5.6)  (5.8)  (7.7)
 Selling, general and administrative  (5.2)  (5.9)  (6.5)
 Restructuring charges        (4.4)
   
   
   
 
  Total operating expenses  (10.8)  (11.7)  (18.6)
   
   
   
 
Operating income (loss)  2.3   (1.1)  (18.1)
Net interest and other income (expense)  0.1   (2.7)  0.3 
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax benefit  2.4   (3.8)  (17.8)
Income tax benefit  0.1      1.0 
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  2.5%  (3.8)%  (16.8)%
   
   
   
 
                         
Years Ended

July 2, 2004June 27, 2003June 28, 2002



Revenue, net $3,046.7   100.0% $2,718.5   100.0% $2,151.2   100.0%
Gross margin  461.6   15.2   442.9   16.3   281.6   13.1 
Operating expenses  306.7   10.1   256.1   9.4   230.9   10.7 
Operating income  154.9   5.1   186.8   6.9   50.7   2.4 
Net interest and other income  0.3   0.0   2.9   0.0   1.4   0.0 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  155.2   5.1   189.7   7.0   52.1   2.4 
Income tax expense (benefit)  3.9   0.1   7.6   0.3   (1.1)  (0.0)
Income from continuing operations  151.3   5.0   182.1   6.7   53.2   2.4 

     Net RevenuesRevenue

     Consolidated net revenues were $2.2, $2.0 and $2.0Net revenue was $3.0 billion in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Thefor 2004, an increase in net revenues in 2002of 12%, or $328 million, from 20012003. Total unit shipments increased to 48.3 million for the year as compared to 39.7 million from the prior year as a result of $0.2 billion, or 10.1%, was primarily due to an increase in unit shipments of 31%,market share and overall demand for hard disk drives in the desktop PC market. This growth in units was partially offset by a 16% decrease$5 per unit decline in average selling prices (“ASP’s”ASPs”). to $63 per unit for 2004 from $68 per unit in 2003.

     Revenue by geographic region for 2004 was 41% from the Americas, 30% from Europe and 29% from Asia, compared to 48%, 30% and 22%, respectively, for 2003. These changes reflect the Company’s continued focus on revenue growth in emerging geographic markets.

18


     Revenue by sales channel for 2004 was 51% from OEMs, 42% from distributors and 7% from the retail channel, compared to 52%, 40% and 8%, respectively, for 2003. The significant changedistribution of revenue by sales channel has remained relatively consistent for the past several quarters.

Net revenue increased $567 million or 26% in units and ASP’s2003 from 2002. This increase in 2002 from 2001 isnet revenue was primarily due to expansion of the Company’s hard drive product line into lower-end desktop PC and consumer electronics markets. Consolidated net revenues in 2001 were flat with 2000, at approximately $2.0 billion. Excluding $141.8 million of revenue in 2000 related to the Company’s discontinued small computer system interface (“SCSI”) product line, revenue increased $138.0 million or 7.6% in 2001. This improvement was due toimproved market share as well as an increase in EIDE drive unitdemand for hard disk drives in the PC market. Unit shipments of approximately 19%,increased to 39.7 million in 2003 from 29.1 million in 2002, partially offset by a 10% declinedecrease in ASP’s.

     Gross ProfitASPs to $68 per unit in 2003 from $74 per unit in 2002.

Gross Margin

     Gross profit was $281.6 million, or 13.1% of revenue in 2002, $207.7 million, or 10.6% of revenue in 2001, and $9.6 million, or 0.5% of revenue, in 2000. Gross profitFor 2004, gross margin percentage decreased to 15.2% from 16.3% for 2000 included $72.5 million of special charges, of which $34.8 million related to costs associated with exiting the SCSI hard drive product line, and $37.7 million related to costs to repair recalled drives. Excluding special charges, gross profit was $82.1 million, or 4.2% of revenue, for 2000.2003. The increasedecrease in gross profit in 2002 from 2001margin percentage over the prior year was primarily the result of aggressive pricing pressures. The Company anticipates that competitive pricing pressure may continue to adversely affect gross margin percentages in 2005. Also contributing to the decrease in the gross margin percentage were start-up expenses and other charges totaling $18.1 million incurred during the first quarter of 2004 relating to the Company’s head manufacturing operations acquired in July 2003. Western Digital was able to partially offset the impact of these pricing conditions and start-up related costs with the ongoing accretive benefit of its head manufacturing operations. For 2003, gross margin percentage increased to 16.3% from 13.1% for 2002. This increase in gross margin percentage was primarily a result of a more cost-effective designs andmoderate pricing environment, manufacturing efficiencies associated with higher unit volume partiallyand continuing cost reduction efforts, offset by lower ASP’s. The increase in gross profit in 2001 from 2000 (excludingan $18.5 million charge related to the 2000 special charges) was primarily the resultCirrus Logic, Inc. litigation settlement.

Operating Expenses

     Total operating expenses, consisting of higher volume and lower manufacturing costs due to 2000 expense reduction efforts, partially offset by lower ASP’s.

     Operating Expenses

     Researchresearch and development (“R&D”) and selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”), were 10.1% of net revenue in 2004 as compared to 9.4% of net revenue in 2003 and 10.7% of net revenue in 2002.

     R&D expense was $120.1, $113.4$201 million, $135 million and $150.7$120 million for 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. The increase of $66 million in R&D expense in 20022004 from 20012003 was primarily related to head-design, mobile and enterprise platform development, as well as the charge of $6.7$26 million incurred during the first quarter of 2004 for acquired IPR&D, offset by reduced employee incentive payments. The $26 million charge related to IPR&D projects acquired from Read-Rite that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. As of July 2, 2004, progress on these projects was consistent with management’s original estimates, including the costs incurred towards completion and projected release dates. The increase of $15 million in R&D in 2003 over 2002 was due to increases in new development programs and higher employee incentive payments, partially offset by expense reduction

17


efforts. The decrease in 2001 from 2000 of $37.3 million was primarily due to the Company’s exit from the SCSI hard drive market during 2000 and expense reduction efforts in its remaining hard drive operations.

     Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)&A expense was $110.8, $115.8$106 million, $121 million and $127.0$111 million for 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. The $15 million decrease in SG&A expense in 20022004 from 2001 of $5.0 million2003 was primarily due to expensea reduction efforts, partially offset by higherin employee incentive payments.programs and reductions in baseline spending. The decrease$10 million increase in 2001SG&A expense in 2003 from 2000 of $11.2 million2002 was primarily duerelated to the Company’s exithigher incentive payments resulting from the SCSI hard drive marketimproved operational results.

The Company will continue to manage its operating expense structure in 2000 and expense reduction efforts inline with its remaining hard drive operations.

     Restructuring Chargesoperating profit objectives.

Interest and Other Income

     During 2000, the Company initiated restructuring actions to improve operational efficiency and reduce operating expenses. These actions primarily consisted of a consolidation of the Company’s Asian operations and termination of its SCSI hard drive product line. Restructuring charges recorded in connection with these actions totaled $85.8 million and consisted of severance and outplacement costs, the retirement of manufacturing equipment and information systems assets, and net lease cancellation costs. Also recorded in connection with these actions were special charges to cost of revenues of $34.8 million for vendor settlements, incremental warranty, and inventory write-downs associated with exiting the SCSI hard drive product line.

     Interest and Other Income (Expense)

Net interest and other income (expense) was $1.4, ($53.1)$0.3 million, $2.9 million and $4.9$1.4 million in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. This includes net investment gains of $4.8$4.4 million in 2002, investment write-offs2003 and related lease contingency accruals of $52.4$5.4 million in 2001, and net investment gains of $14.8 million in 2000.2002. Excluding these nonrecurring items, net interest and other expenseincome (expense) was $3.4, $0.7$0.3 million, ($1.5) million and $9.9($4.0) million in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. The increase in net expense in 2002 (excluding nonrecurring items)interest income over the past two years was primarily due to a decreasethe Company’s redemption of its convertible debentures during the third quarter of 2003, resulting in interest income as a result of lower interest rates.expense as compared to 2002.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

     Income tax expense was $3.9 million in 2004 as compared to $7.6 million in 2003 and an income tax benefit of $1.1 million in 2002. The decrease in netthe income tax expense of $3.7 million in 2001 (excluding nonrecurring items) was2004 primarily related to lower overall

19


earnings and a more favorable mix of earnings within certain tax jurisdictions. Differences between the effective tax rate for 2004 of 2.5%, as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate, are primarily due to lower interesttax holidays in Malaysia and Thailand that expire at various points in time ranging from 2005 to 2014. The 2003 increase in the income tax expense on lower average debt balances resultingof $8.7 million from 2002 is primarily related to higher overall earnings in 2003 and the paymentnon-recurrence of certain tax benefits realized in 2000 of an outstanding term loan of $50.0 million and redemptions during 2000 and 2001 of the Company’s 5.25% zero coupon convertible debentures.

     Included in 2002’s net investment gains is a $9.0 million recovery from the sale of the Company’s remaining Komag investments to a third party. These investments were part of the $52.4 million nonoperating charge recorded to net interest and other expense during 2001 to adjust the carrying value of equity investments in and notes receivable from Komag and accruals of Komag contingent guarantees, resulting from Komag’s announcement to file for Chapter 11 reorganization.

     Income Tax Benefit

2002. The Company’s 2002 net income tax benefit of $1.1 million included a federal income tax refund of $3.1 million for a loss carryback available as a result of tax legislation enacted during thethat year. During 2001, the Company did not record an income tax benefit, as no loss carrybacks were available at that time. During 2000, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $19.5 million to adjust its current and deferred tax accruals. The accruals were established in prior years primarily for the unremitted income of foreign subsidiaries. However, due to the significant increase of net operating loss carryforwards and reevaluation of the accruals after the substantial international restructurings in 2000, the Company believed the accruals were no longer necessary. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Discontinued Operations

     During 2002, the Company discontinued the operations of new business ventures, including Connex, Inc. (“Connex”), SANavigator, Inc. (“SANavigator”) and Keen Personal Media, Inc. (“Keen”). The Company sold substantially all of the assets of its Connex and SANavigator businesses in 2002 for a net gain of $24.5 million and terminated the Keen operations. TheseThe 2002 operating losses for the periods reportednew ventures and the net gain recognized on the sale of Connex and SANavigator have been segregatedexcluded from continuing operations and reported separately on the statements of operationsincome as discontinued operations.

18


     Extraordinary Item

     During 2002, the Company issued 2.6 million shares of common stock and paid $17.6 million in cash in exchange for $72.4 million in face value of its convertible debentures (with a book value of $31.6 million). During 2001, the Company issued 16.0 million shares of common stock in exchange for $295.7 million in face value of its convertible debentures (with a book value of $120.3 million). During 2000, the Company issued 26.7 million shares of common stock in exchange for $735.6 million in face value of its convertible debentures (with a book value of $284.1 million). These redemptions were private, individually negotiated transactions with certain institutional investors. As a result of the redemptions, the Company recognized an extraordinary loss of $0.1 million in 2002 and extraordinary gains of $22.4 and $166.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively (see also “New Accounting Pronouncements”).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $223.7$378 million at July 2, 2004 and $393 million at June 28, 2002 and $167.6 million at June 29, 2001.27, 2003. Net cash provided by continuing operationsoperating activities during 2004 was $82.8$190 million during 2002 as compared to $278 million for 2003. Net cash flows from operating activities primarily resulted from net cash used for continuing operations of $58.8 million during 2001.income. This $141.6 million improvement in cash provided by continuing operations consists of a $79.7 million improvement inrepresents the Company’s net income, netprincipal source of non-cash items, and a $61.9 million decrease incash. Operating cash flows were impacted by net cash used to fund working capital requirements. These improvements arerequirements of $89 million for 2004, an increase of $116 million from 2003. The increase in net cash used to fund working capital requirements was primarily due to significantly better operating performance bya higher accounts receivable balance associated with changes in the Company, includingCompany’s mix of customers, higher sales volume, improved cost management,work in process inventory associated with the head manufacturing operations and the payment of a lower cash conversion cycle.$45 million litigation settlement.

     The Company’s working capital requirements depend upon the effective management of the Company’s cash conversion cycle. The cash conversion cycle, which represents the sumconsisted of the number of39 days sales outstanding (“DSO”) andplus 20 days inventory outstanding (“DIO”) less 61 days payable outstanding (“DPO”), was negative 9two days for 2002, a 2 day improvement over2004 as compared to negative nine days for 2003. The increase in the prior year. Accounts receivable at June 28, 2002cash conversion cycle was due to higher than the prior yearDSO’s as a result of changes in the Company’s mix of customers and higher fourth quarter revenue combined with longer average collection days due to the elimination of certain early payment discount programs. However, this increase in average collection days was offset by improved inventory turns and longer payment days with suppliers. The allowance for doubtful accounts decreased to $7.6 million at June 28, 2002 from $13.3 million at June 29, 2001DIO’s as a result of the write-offlonger production cycle associated with the head manufacturing operations. These increases were partially offset by an increase in DPO’s. The Company expects its financial business model will continue to generate a negative cash conversion cycle going forward.

     Net cash used in investing activities for 2004 was $227 million as compared to $59 million for 2003. The 2004 investing activities consisted of fully reserved accounts receivable balances which management determined$95 million for the Read-Rite asset acquisition and $132 million of net capital expenditures. The 2003 investing activities related primarily to be uncollectable.

     Other uses of cash during 2002 includednet capital expenditures. The increase in net capital expenditures of $47.7 million,was primarily for normal replacement of existing assets and the purchase of assets for the Company’s new manufacturing facility in Thailand, and $17.6 million for debenture redemptions. Other sources of cash during 2002 included $9.9 million received from the sale of assets, $10.2 million received in connection with stock option and warrant exercises and Employee Stock Purchase Plan purchases, and $0.5 million received by the Company’s subsidiary from minority investors.

     Other uses of cash during 2001 included net capital expenditures of $50.7 million, primarilypurchased to upgrade the Company’s head manufacturing capabilities, increase desktop hard disk drive production capabilities and for the normal replacement of existing assets. Other sourcesFor 2005, capital expenditures are expected to increase to approximately $250 million. The increase in capital expenditures is expected to consist primarily of investments in mobile hard disk drive manufacturing capacity, continued expansion of head manufacturing operations and IT infrastructure upgrades. The Company expects to use planned capital lease facilities to offset up to $100 million of its capital expenditures. Approximately $19 million of capital leases were completed in 2004.

     Net cash during 2001 included proceedsprovided by financing activities for 2004 was $21 million as compared to net cash used by financing activities of $15.0$50 million received upon the salefor 2003. The net cash provided by financing activities in 2004 consisted primarily of marketable equity securities, $110.5$24 million received upon issuance of 23.5 million shares of the Companycommon stock under employee plans and $14 million of net proceeds from long-term debt, partially offset by $16 million used in the Company’s equity facility and $7.1stock repurchase program. The net cash used by financing activities for the year ended 2003 consisted primarily of $88 million received in connection with the stock option exercises and Employee Stock Purchase Plan purchases.

     The Company anticipates that capital expenditures in 2003 will not be more than $65.0 million and will relate to normal replacement of existing assets and expansionused for redemption of the Company’s new Thailand facility.remaining convertible debentures, partially offset by $44 million received upon issuance of common stock under employee plans.

     Discontinued operations provided net cash proceeds of $18.2 million in 2002, including approximately $36.7 million net proceeds from asset sales. This compares to $39.5 million in net cash used to fund the operating, investing and financing activities of the discontinued operations for 2001.

     The Company has zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due February 18, 2018 (the “Debentures”). The Debentures are subordinated to all senior debt; are redeemable at the option of the Company any time after February 18, 2003 at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption; and at the holder’s option, will be redeemed by the Company, as of February 18, 2003,

1920


February 18, 2008 or February 18, 2013, or if there

Capital Commitments

The following is a Fundamental Change (as defined in the Debenture documents), at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption. The payment on those dates, with the exception of a Fundamental Change, can be in cash, stock or any combination, at the Company’s option. The Debentures are convertible into sharessummary of the Company’s common stocksignificant contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments at the rate of 14.935 shares per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. Since issuance of the Debentures in 1998, the Company has redeemed Debentures with a book value of $435.9 million and an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $1.1 billion through the issuance of cash and/ or common stock. These redemptions were private, individually negotiated transactions with certain institutional investors. As of June 28, 2002, the remaining book value of the Debentures was $86.2 million, the aggregate principal amount at maturity was $193.5 million and the market value was $83.0 million. Based on current forecasts that show the Company continuing to generate positive cash flow from operations, the Company now intends to satisfy the majority, if not all, of its put obligations in cash instead of common stock. Accordingly, the Debentures have been classified as a current liability at June 28, 2002. Debentures not put to the Company in February 2003, if any, will be reclassified as long-term debt.July 2, 2004 (in millions):

                      
Less thanMore than
Total1 Year1-3 Years3-5 Years5 Years





Long-term debt, including current portion $50.0  $9.4  $25.0  $15.6  $ 
Capital lease obligations  17.9   5.9   12.0       
Operating leases  57.4   9.8   18.9   15.0   13.7 
Purchase obligations  867.3   855.8   9.5   2.0    
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $992.6  $880.9  $65.4  $32.6  $13.7 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Long-Term Debt

     During 2001,On September 19, 2003, the Company entered into a three-year new $125 million five-year credit facility (“Senior Credit Facility,Facility”) replacing a previousthe facility that had matured on March 31, 2000.September 20, 2003. The new Senior Credit Facility provides up to $125$75 million in revolving credit (subject to outstanding letters of credit and a borrowing base calculation), matures in revolving credit and a term loan of $50 million. Both the term loan and revolving credit facility mature on September 20, 200319, 2008, and isare secured by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory, 65% of theits stock in its foreign subsidiaries and other assets. At the option of the Company, borrowings bear interest at either LIBOR (with option periods of one to three months) or a base rate, plus a margin determined by the borrowing base.margin. The Senior Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain certain amountslevels of tangible net worth,income, prohibits the payment of cash dividends on common stock, and contains a number of other covenants. AsThe Company was in compliance with all such covenants at July 2, 2004. The $50 million term loan was funded on September 22, 2003 and requires quarterly principal payments of $3 million beginning in October 2004. The Company used the proceeds from the term loan to repay obligations incurred as a result of the date hereof,Read-Rite asset acquisition (see Note 3, “Read-Rite Asset Acquisition” included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). At July 2, 2004 there were no borrowings under the facility. However,revolving credit facility and $71 million was available.

Purchase Orders

In the normal course of business to reduce the risk of component shortages, the Company enters into purchase orders with suppliers for the purchase of hard disk drive components used to manufacture the Company’s products. These purchase orders generally cover forecasted component supplies needed for production during the next quarter, become payable upon receipt of the components, and generally may be changed or canceled at any time prior to shipment of the components. In some cases we may be obligated to pay for certain costs related to changes to, or cancellation of, a purchase order, such as costs incurred for raw materials or work in process. The Company has issued a $25 million standby letterentered into long-term purchase agreements for components with certain vendors such as Komag, IBM, and Marvell. Future purchases under these agreements are not fixed and determinable as they depend on the Company’s overall unit volume requirements and are contingent upon the prices, technology and quality of creditthe supplier’s products remaining competitive. These arrangements are not included under “Purchase Obligations” in the table above. See below under the facilityheading “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” for a discussion of these commitments.

Forward Exchange Contracts

The Company purchases short-term, forward exchange contracts to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (“Cirrus”) concerning $25 millionhedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for operating expenses and product costs denominated in disputed accounts payable. These disputed accounts payable have been recorded inforeign currencies. See Part II, Item 7A, under the heading “Disclosure About Foreign Currency Risk,” for the Company’s financial statements, butcurrent forward exchange contract commitments.

Stock Repurchase Program

     The Company announced a stock repurchase program on May 5, 2004. Under the program, the Company may purchase on the open market up to $100 million of its common stock depending on market conditions and other

21


corporate considerations. Stock repurchases are partexpected to be funded by operating cash flow. Some of the Company’s litigation against Cirrus (see Note 5repurchased shares will offset the dilutive impact of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The availabilitycommon stock issued under employee stock option and share purchase programs. During the Senior Credit Facility has been reduced by a corresponding amountfourth quarter of the outstanding letter of credit.

     During 2001 and 2000, respectively,2004 the Company issued 23.5 and 24.6repurchased 1.9 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of approximately $16.0 million. During 2005, the Company may continue to opportunistically repurchase its stock as market conditions allow. For example, during August 2004, the Company repurchased an additional 2.1 million shares of common stock under preexisting shelf registrations for net cash proceedsat a total cost of $110.5 and $111.8$15.0 million. During 2002, no common stock was issued under these shelf registrations and the Company withdrew them as management determined they would not be utilized in the foreseeable future.

     At June 28, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $223.7 million, working capital of $34.8 million (net of the Debentures) and shareholders’ equity of $102.9 million. In addition, the Company has a Senior Credit Facility providing up to $125 million in revolving credit (subject to outstanding letters of credit and a borrowing base calculation).     The Company believes its current cash and cash equivalents and its existing credit facility will be sufficient to meet its working capital needs through the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that the Senior Credit Facility or lease financing will continue to be available to the Company. Also, the Company’s ability to sustain its working capital position is dependent upon a number of factors that are discussed below under the headingsheading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate” and “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Commitments

     The following is a summary of the Company’s significant contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments at June 28, 2002:

     Convertible Debentures

The Company has zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due February 18, 2018 (the “Debentures”). For a descriptioncurrently anticipates that it will continue to utilize its liquidity and cash flows to improve the efficiency and capability of the Debentures, see the discussion under “Liquidityits existing hard disk drive and Capital Resources”.

20


     Operating Leases

The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under long-term, non-cancelable operating leases which expire at various dates through 2010. The following table summarizes the future payments of these leases (in thousands):

      
Operating
Leases

2003 $10,131 
2004  8,213 
2005  7,061 
2006  7,004 
2007  5,508 
Thereafter  19,559 
   
 
 Total future minimum lease obligations $57,476 
   
 

     Purchase Orders

     In the normal course of business, to reduce the risk of component shortages, the Company enters into purchase commitments with suppliers for the purchase of hard drive components used to manufacture the Company’s products. These commitments generally cover forecasted component supplies needed for production during the next quarter, become payable upon receipt of the components and may be non-cancelable (cancellation charges may be significant). The Company’s relationship with suppliers allows for some flexibility within these commitments and quantities are subject to change as a quarter progresses and the Company’s needs change.

     Forward Exchange Contracts

     Although the majority of the Company’s transactions are in U.S. Dollars, some transactions are based in various foreign currencies. The Company purchases short-term, forward exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for operating expenses denominated in foreign currencies. The Company does not purchase short-term forward exchange contracts for trading purposes. As of June 28, 2002, the Company had $5.0 million outstanding of purchased foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The contracts have maturity dates that do not exceed three months. At June 28, 2002, the carrying value of the contracts approximates fair value.head manufacturing operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The preceding discussion and analysis ofCompany has prepared the Company’s results of operations is based on itsaccompanying consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordanceconformity with GAAP.accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of the financial statements requires estimationthe use of judgment and judgmentestimates that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. The Company has adopted accounting policies and practices that are generally accepted in the industry in which it operates. FollowingThe Company believes the following are the Company’sits most critical accounting policies that affect significant areas and involve management’s judgment and estimates. If these estimates differ materiallysignificantly from actual results, the impact to the consolidated financial statements may be material.

Revenue and Accounts Receivable

     In accordance with standard industry practice, the Company has agreements with resellers that provide price protection for inventories held by resellers at the time of published list price reductions. In addition, the Company may have agreements with resellers that provide for stock rotation on slow-moving items and other incentive programs. In accordance with current accounting standards, the Company recognizes revenue upon shipment or delivery to resellers and records a corresponding adjustmentreduction to revenue for estimated price protection and other programs in effect until the resellers sell such inventory to their customers. Adjustments are based on

21


anticipated price decreases during the reseller holding period, estimated amounts to be reimbursed to qualifying customers, estimated future returns, as well as historical pricing information.
If end-market demand for hard disk drives declines significantly, the Company may have to increase sell-through incentive payments to resellers, resulting in an increase in price protection allowances, which could adversely impact operating results.

     The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing specific customer accounts and assessing the risk of uncollectibilityloss based on insolvency, disputes or other collection issues. In addition, the Company routinely analyzes the different receivable aging categories and its bad debt loss history and establishes reserves based on a combination of past due receivables and expected future losses. If the lengthfinancial condition of time receivables are past due.a significant customer deteriorates resulting in their inability to pay their accounts when due, an increase in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts would be required, which could negatively affect operating results.

     The Company records provisions against revenue and cost of revenuesrevenue for estimated sales returns in the same period that the related revenues arerevenue is recognized. The Company bases these provisions on existing product return notifications as well as historical returns by product type (see “Warranty”).

If actual sales returns exceed expectations, an increase in the sales return provision would be required, which could negatively affect operating results.

Warranty

     The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs when revenue is recognized. Warranty covers costcosts of repair or replacement of the hard disk drive andover the warranty periods rangeperiod, which generally ranges from one to threefive years. The Company has comprehensive processes with which to estimate accruals for warranty, which include specific detail on hard disk drives in the field by product type, historical field return rates and costs to repair. If actual product return rates or costs to repair returned products increase above expectations, an increase in the warranty provision would be required, which could negatively affect operating results.

22


Inventory

     Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value. Inventory write-downs are recorded for the valuation of inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value by analyzing market conditions and estimates of future sales prices as compared to inventory costs and inventory balances.

     The Company evaluates inventory balances for excess quantities and obsolescence on a regular basis by analyzing backlog, estimated demand, inventory on hand, sales levels and other information. The Companyinformation, and writes down inventory balances for excess and obsolete inventory based on the analysis.

Unanticipated changes in technology or customer demand could result in a decrease in demand for one or more of the Company’s products, which may require an increase in inventory write-downs that could negatively affect operating results.

Litigation and Other Contingencies

     The Company applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”Contingencies,” to determine when and how much to accrue for and disclose related to legal and other contingencies. Accordingly, the Company accrues loss contingencies when management, in consultation with its legal advisors, concludes that a loss is probable and reasonably estimable.

(Refer to Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6 “Legal Proceedings” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The ability to predict the ultimate outcome of such matters involves judgments, estimates and inherent uncertainties. The actual outcome of such matters could differ materially from management’s estimates.

Deferred Tax Assets

     The Company’s deferred tax assets, which consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, are fully reserved due to management’s determination that it is “moremore likely than not”not that these assets will not be realized. This determination is based on the weight of available evidence, the most significant of which is the Company’s loss history in the related tax jurisdictions. Should this determination change in the future, some amount of deferred tax assets could be recognized, resulting in a tax benefit or a reduction of future tax expense.

New Accounting PronouncementsRisk Factors That May Affect Future Results

Declines in ASPs in the hard disk drive industry adversely affect our operating results.

     During April 2002,The hard disk drive industry has experienced declining ASP’s. Although the FASB issued Statementrate of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, “Rescissiondecline has moderated in recent years, there can be no assurance that this trend will continue. In fact, during the fourth quarter of FASB Statements No. 4, 44,2004, ASPs decreased significantly. Increases in areal density mean that the average drive we sell has fewer heads and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13,disks for the same capacity and, Technical Corrections” (“SFAS 145”). SFAS 145 rescinds SFAS 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt”, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as an extraordinary item. The Company will adopt SFAS 145 on June 29, 2002 at which time it will begin classifying gains and losses resulting from the extinguishment of debt as other income and expense, instead of extraordinary items. The adoption will not havetherefore, a net impact on the Company’s results of operations or liquidity.

     On September 11, 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-15, “Determining Whether Certain Conversions of Convertible Debt to Equity Securities are within

22


the Scope of FASB Statement No. 84, Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt” (“FAS 84”). The EITF deliberated this issue because of diversity in practice in the accounting for conversions of convertible debt to equity initiated by the debt holder. In practice, some registrants accounted for these transactions following FAS 84 while others followed Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 26, “Early Extinguishment of Debt” (“APB 26”). The EITF concluded that FAS 84 applies to conversions of convertible debt when the offer for consideration in excesslower component cost. Because of the original conversion terms was made by the bondholder. The EITF concluded that this guidance should be followed for transactions entered into on or after September 12, 2002. The Company’s previous extinguishments of its convertible debentures involving the issuance of stock have been accounted for under APB 26 whereby a gain on early extinguishment was recorded equal to the excesscompetitiveness of the net book value of the indebtedness over the fair value of the consideration paid to extinguish the indebtedness. Following the guidance in EITF Issue No. 02-15, similar early extinguishments of the convertible debentures involving stock initiated by the debt holder will give rise to a conversion inducement expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued in excess of those required to be issued upon the exercise of the debenture conversion feature. The Company does not expect EITF Issue No. 02-15 to have a significant impact on the future results of operations because the Company does not expect to use stock to make early extinguishments of its convertible debentures.

Risk factors related to the hard disk drive industry, lower costs generally mean lower prices. This is true even for those products that are competitive and introduced into the market in which we operatea timely manner. Our ASPs decline even further when competitors lower prices as a result of decreased costs or to absorb excess capacity, liquidate excess inventories, restructure or attempt to gain market share.

 
Our operating results depend on our being among the first-to-marketoptimizing time-to-market and first-to-volume with ourtime-to-volume, overall quality, and costs of new products at a low cost.and established products.

     To achieve consistent success with computerour customers who manufacturer customers,computers, systems and consumer electronic devices, we must be an early provider of next generation hard drives featuring leading technologybalance several key attributes: time-to-market, time-to-volume, quality, cost, service, price and high quality.a broad product portfolio. If we fail to:

 • consistently maintain or improve our time-to-market performance with ouroverall quality of products on new and established programs,
• maintain competitive cost structures on new and established products,
 
 • produce thesesufficient quantities of products in sufficient volume withinat the capacities our rapid product cycle,customers demand while managing the integration of new and established technologies,
 
• develop and qualify new products that have changes in overall specifications or features that our customers may require for their business needs,

23


 • qualify these products with key customers on a timely basis by meeting all of our customers’ needs for performance, quality and quality specifications,
• achieve acceptable manufacturing yields and costs with these products,features, or
 
 • consistently meet stated quality requirements on delivered products,

our operating results would be adversely affected.

 
Product life cycles in the desktop hard disk drive market require continuous technical innovation associated with higher areal densities.

     New products in the desktop hard disk drive market may require higher areal densities (the gigabyte of storage per disk) than previous product generations, posing formidable technical and manufacturing challenges. Higher areal densities require fewer heads and disks to achieve a given drive capacity, which means that existing head technology mustto be improved or new technology developed to accommodate more data on a single disk. In addition, our introduction of new products during a technology transition increases the likelihood of unexpected quality concerns. Our failure to bring thesehigh quality new products to market on time and at acceptable costs wouldmay put us at a competitive disadvantage to companies that achieve these results. In addition, technology improvements may require us to reduce the price on existing products to remain competitive.

 
Short product life cycles make it difficult to recover the cost of development.Increases in areal density may outpace customers’ demand for storage capacity.

     OverThe rate of increase in areal density may be greater than the past few years,increase in our customers’ demand for aggregate storage capacity. This could lead to our customers’ storage capacity needs being satisfied with more lower-cost single-surface drives, thereby decreasing our revenue. As a result, even with increasing aggregate demand for storage capacity, our ASPs could decline, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Product life cycles influence our financial results.

Product life cycles have been extending since the middle of calendar year 2002 due in large part to a decrease in the rate of hard disk drive areal density has increased at a much more rapid pace than previously experienced. This has significantly shortenedgrowth. However, there can be no assurance that this trend will continue. If longer product life cycles since each generationcontinue, we may need to develop new technologies or programs to reduce our costs on any particular product in order to maintain competitive pricing for such product. This may result in an increase in our overall expenses and a decrease in our gross margins, both of drives is more cost effective than the previous one. Shorterwhich could adversely affect our operating results. If product life cycles makeshorten, it may be more difficult to recover the cost of product development.development before the product becomes obsolete. Although we believe that the current rate of growth in areal density is lower than in the past several years and will continue to decrease in the near term, we expect that areal density will continue to increase. Our failure to recover the cost of product development in the future could adversely affect our operating results.

 
Short product life cycles and new products force usIf we fail to continually qualify newour products with our customers.customers, they may not purchase any units of a particular product line, which would have a significant adverse impact on our sales.

     Due to short product life cycles and continuously changing products, we mustWe regularly engage in new product qualification with our customers. To be considered for qualification, we must be among the leaders in time-to-market with our new products. Once a product is accepted for qualification testing, any failurefailures or

23


delay delays in the qualification process can result in our losing sales to that customer until the next generation of products is introduced. The effect of missing a product qualification opportunity is magnified by the limited number of high volume computer manufacturers, most of which continue to consolidate their share of the PC market. If product life cycles continue to be extended due to a decrease in the rate of areal density growth, we may have a significantly longer period to wait before we have an opportunity to qualify a new product with a customer, which could harm our competitive position. These risks are increased because we expect cost improvements and competitive pressures to result in declining sales and gross margins on our current generation products.
 
Unexpected technology advances in the hard disk drive industry could harm our competitive position.

     If one of our competitors were able to implement a significant advance in head or hard disk drive technology that enables a “step-change” increase in areal density that permits greater storage of data on a disk, it could put us at a competitive disadvantage and harm our operating results.

24


     Advances in magnetic, optical, semiconductor or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products that have better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than our products. If these products prove to be superior in performance or cost per unit of capacity, we could be at a competitive disadvantage to the companies offering those products.

 
Our average selling prices are declining.A fundamental change in recording technology could result in significant increases in our operating expenses and could put us at a competitive disadvantage.

     We expect that our average selling prices for hard drives will continue to decline. Increases in areal density mean that the average drive we sell has fewer heads and disks, and therefore lower component cost. Because of the competitiveness ofCurrently the hard disk drive industry loweruses giant magnetoresistive head technology, which allows significantly higher storage capacities than the previously utilized thin-film head technology. However, the industry is developing new recording technologies that may enable greater recording densities than currently available using magnetoresistive head technology, including perpendicular, current perpendicular-to-plane, and tunneling junction technology. If the industry experiences a fundamental shift in recording technology, hard disk drive manufacturers would need to timely adjust their designs and processes to accommodate the new technology in order to remain competitive. As a result, we could incur substantial costs generally mean lower prices. This is true even for those productsin developing new technologies, media, and tools to remain competitive. We may also become more dependent on suppliers to ensure our access to components that are competitive and introduced intoaccommodate the market in a timely manner. Our average selling prices decline even further when competitors lower prices to absorb excess capacity, liquidate excess inventories, restructure or attempt to gain market share.new technology. These results would increase our operating costs, which may negatively impact our operating results.

 
The hard disk drive industry is highly competitive and characterized by rapid shifts in market share among the major competitors.

     The price of hard disk drives has fallen over time due to increases in supply, cost reductions, technological advances and price reductions by competitors seeking to liquidate excess inventories or attempting to gain market share. In addition, rapid technological changes often reduce the volume and profitability of sales of existing products and increase the risk of inventory obsolescence. These factors, taken together, result in significant and rapid shifts in market share among the industry’s major participants. For example, during the first quarterIn addition, product recalls can lead to a loss of 2000, the Company lost market share, as a result of a product recall. Similar losses in market sharewhich could adversely affect our operating results.

 
Our prices and margins are subject to declines due to unpredictable end-user demand and oversupply of hard disk drives.

     Demand for our hard disk drives depends on the demand for systems manufactured by our customers and on storage upgrades to existing systems. The demand for systems has been volatile in the past and often has had an exaggerated effect on the demand for hard disk drives in any given period. As a result, the hard disk drive market tends to experiencehas experienced periods of excess capacity, which typically leadhas led to intense price competition. During calendar year 2001 and the first half of calendar year 2002, the industry experienced weak PC demand in the U.S. and other markets. If intense price competition occurs, as a result of weak demand, we may be forced to lower prices sooner and more than expected, which could result in lower revenuesrevenue and gross profits.margins.

 
Changes in the markets for hard disk drives require us to develop new products.

     Over the past few years the consumer market for desktop computers has shifted significantly towards lower priced systems, especially thosesystems. According to data released by TrendFOCUS in November 2003, systems priced below $1,000. Although we were late to market with a value line hard drive to serve$600 comprised the low-cost PC market, we are now offering such value line products at prices that we view as competitive. However, iffastest growing segment of the desktop computer market. If we are not able to continue to offer a competitively priced value line hard disk drive for the low-cost PC market, our share of that market will likely fall, which could harm our operating results.

24


The PC market for hard disk drives is also fragmenting into a variety of computing devices and products. Some of these products, such as Internet appliances, may not contain a hard drive. On the other hand, manyMany industry analysts expect, as do we, that as broadcasting and communications are increasingly converted to digital technology from the older, analog technology, the technology of computers and consumer electronics and communication devices will continue to converge, and hard disk drives will be found in many consumer products other than computers. For 2002, more than 10%example, although general market acceptance remains in its early stages, the use of hard disk drives has expanded into the game console market. Microsoft and Sony currently incorporate a hard disk drive into their video game systems. However, there can be no assurance that these companies will continue incorporating a hard disk drive into their game consoles, or that the market for these products will grow.

     In addition, we expect that the consumer market for audio-video products incorporating a hard disk drive will continue to grow. However, because this market remains relatively new, although overall growth has been strong, accurate forecasts for future growth remain challenging. Moreover, some of the devices, such as personal video recorders and digital video recorders, may require attributes not currently offered in our unit sales were for consumer products, other than computers, primarily gaming devices.which may result in a need to expend capital, increasing our overall operational expense. If we are not successful in using our hard disk drive technology and

25


expertise to develop new products for thesethe emerging markets,consumer electronics market, or if we are required to incur significant costs in developing such products, it will likelymay harm our operating results.
 
The market acceptance forIf we do not successfully expand into new hard disk drives in game consoles continues to be uncertain.drive market segments, our business may suffer.

     The useTo remain a significant supplier of hard disk drives, in the game console market iswe will need to offer a fairly recent trend. Due to the price competitive naturebroad range of the hard disk drive industry, with selling pricesproducts to our customers. We currently offer a variety of personal computers being substantially higher than game consoles, game manufacturers may not have the ability to either incorporate or continue to incorporate3.5-inch form factor hard disk drives into their overall architecture.for the desktop computer market. However, demand for hard disk drives may shift to products in smaller form factors, which we do not currently offer, but which some of our competitors offer. In addition, current price reduction demands from either currentthe enterprise and desktop PC industries are transitioning to higher speed interfaces such as SATA to handle higher data transfer rates. We currently offer SATA products; however, the transition of technology and the introduction of new products is challenging and creates risks. While we continue to develop new products and look to expand into non-desktop applications such as consumer electronics and mobile products, the success of our new product introductions is dependent on a number of factors, including difficulties faced in manufacturing ramp, market acceptance, effective management of inventory levels in line with anticipated product demand, and the risk that our new products will have quality problems or future game consoleother defects in the early stages of introduction that were not anticipated in the design of those products. If we fail to successfully develop and manufacture new products, customers may not makedecrease the amount of our products that they purchase, and we may lose business to our competitors who offer these products or who use their dominance in the enterprise or mobile market to encourage sales of desktop hard disk drive integration an attractive market for us or other hard drive manufacturers.drives.

 
We depend on our key personnel and skilled employees.

     Our success depends upon the continued contributions of our key personnel and skilled employees, many of whom would be extremely difficult to replace. Worldwide competition for skilled employees in the hard disk drive industry is intense. WeVolatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key personnel or skilled employees who have lost a number of experienced hard drive engineers over the past two years as a result of the loss of retention value of their employeebeen granted stock options (because of the decrease in price of our common stock) and aggressive recruiting of our employees.options. If we are unable to retain our existing key personnel or skilled employees, or hire and integrate new key personnel or skilled employees, our operating results would likely be harmed.

Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly

 
Loss of market share with a key customer could harm our operating results.

     A majority of our revenue comes from a few customers. For example, during 2002,2004, sales to our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 58%51% of revenue.revenue, as compared to 55% of revenue for 2003. These customers have a variety of suppliers to choose from and therefore can make substantial demands on us. Even if we successfully qualify a product with a customer, the customer generally is not obligated to purchase any minimum volume of products from us and is able to terminate its relationship with us at any time. Our ability to maintain strong relationships with our principal customers is essential to our future performance. If we lose a key customer, or if any of our key customers reduce their orders of our products or require us to reduce our prices before we are able to reduce costs, our operating results would likely be harmed. For example, this occurred withIn addition, if customer pressures require us to reduce our enterprise hard drive product line earlypricing such that our gross margins are diminished, we could decide not to sell our products to a particular customer, which could result in the third quarter of 2000 and is one of the factors which led toa decrease in our decision to exit the enterprise hard drive market.revenue.

 
Dependence on a limited number of qualified suppliers of components and manufacturing equipment could lead to delays, lost revenue or increased costs.

     Because we do not manufacture anydepend on a limited number of suppliers for certain hard disk drive components and manufacturing equipment, an increase in the basiccost of such components in our hard drives,or equipment, an extended shortage of required components or equipment, or the failure of key suppliers to remain in business, adjust to market conditions, or to meet our quality, yield or production requirements could harm us more severely than our competitors, some of whom manufacture certain of the components for their hard drives, and could significantly harm our operating results. A number of the components used by us are available from only a single or limited number of qualified outside suppliers.suppliers, and there is continued attrition and consolidation in our supplier base. In addition, some of the components (or component types) used in our products are used in other devices, such as mobile telephones and digital cameras. If there is a significant simultaneous upswing in demand for such a component (or component type) from several high volume industries, resulting in a supply reduction, or a component is otherwise in short supply, or if a supplier fails to qualify or has a quality issue with a component, we may experience delays or increased costs in obtaining that component. In addition, if a component becomes unavailable, we could suffer significant loss of revenue. For example, we lost revenue in

2526


September 1999 when we had to shut down our Caviar product line production for approximately two weeks as a result of a faulty power driver chip that was sole-sourced from a third party supplier.

     To reduce the risk of component shortages, we attempt to provide significant lead times when buying these components. As a result, we may havebe subject to pay significant cancellation charges to suppliers if we cancel orders, as we did in 1998which may occur when we accelerated our transition to magnetoresistive recording headmake technology and astransitions.

     In some cases, not only are we did in 2000 asdependent on a resultlimited number of our decision to exit the enterprise hard drive market.

In April 1999,suppliers, but we also have entered into contractual commitments that require us to buy a three-yearsubstantial number of components from certain suppliers. For example, we have entered into a volume purchase agreement with Komag under which we buy a substantial portionfor the purchase of our media components, from Komag. In October 2001, we amended the Komagand volume purchase agreement to extend the initial term to six years. Similarly, in February 2001, we entered into a two-year volume purchase agreementagreements with IBM under which we buy a substantial portionand Marvell for the purchase of our read channel chips from IBM. Effective June 2002, we amended the IBM volume purchase agreement to extend the initial term through December 31, 2003. These strategic relationships have increased our dependence on each of Komag and IBM as a supplier.devices. Our future operating results may depend substantially on Komag’s ability to timely qualify its mediatheir components in our new development programs, and each of Komag’s, IBM’s, and IBM’sMarvell’s ability to supply us with these components or chips, as the case may be, in sufficient volume to meet our production requirements. A significant disruption in Komag’sany of these suppliers’ ability to manufacture and supply us with mediathe components could harm our operating results.

In addition, certain equipment we use in our manufacturing or IBM’stesting processes is available only from a limited number of suppliers. Some of this equipment uses materials that at times could be in short supply. If these materials are not available, or are not available in the quantities we require for our manufacturing and testing processes, our ability to manufacture our products could be impacted, and we could suffer significant loss of revenue.

If we are unable to timely and cost-effectively develop heads with leading technology and overall quality, our ability to sell our products may be significantly diminished, which could materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.

As a result of our head manufacturing operations, we are developing and manufacturing a substantial portion of the heads used in the hard disk drives we manufacture. Consequently, we are more dependent upon our own development and execution efforts and less able to take advantage of head technologies developed by other head manufacturers. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in timely and cost-effectively developing and manufacturing heads for products using perpendicular recording technology, or other future technologies. We also may not achieve acceptable manufacturing yields using such technologies necessary to satisfy our customers’ product needs, or we may encounter quality problems with the heads we manufacture. In addition, we may not have access to external sources of supply uswithout incurring substantial costs. If we fail to develop new technologies in a timely manner, or if we encounter quality problems with read channel chipsthe heads we manufacture, and if we do not have access to external sources of supply that incorporate new technologies, we would have a competitive disadvantage to companies that are successful in this regard, and our business and financial results could harmsuffer.

We will experience additional costs and risks in connection with our head manufacturing operations.

     Our acquisition of head manufacturing assets represented a fundamental change in our operating structure, as we are now manufacturing heads for use in the hard disk drives we manufacture. Consequently, we carry a higher percentage of fixed costs than assumed in our prior financial business model. If the overall level of production decreases for any reason, our head manufacturing assets may face under-utilization that may impact our results of operations. We are therefore subject to additional risks related to overall asset utilization, including the need to operate at high levels of utilization to drive competitive costs, and the need for assured supply of components, especially hard disk drive media, that is optimized to work with our heads.

     Moreover, capital expenditures and working capital investments required to support the head manufacturing operations, including research and development expenses and expenses necessary to investigate new recording technologies to extend technology, will increase.

     In addition, we may incur additional costs, expenses and risks, including:

• we may not have sufficient head sources in the event that we are unable to manufacture a sufficient supply of heads to satisfy our needs;
• third party head suppliers may not deal with us or may not deal with us on the same terms and conditions we have previously enjoyed;

27


• the costs of operating head manufacturing assets may exceed the prices we have historically paid for heads or the prices that might be otherwise available to us from other vendors;
• we may be subject to claims that our manufacturing of heads may infringe certain intellectual property rights of other companies;
• we could incur substantial costs, including clean up costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws applicable to our Fremont, California facility, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water; and
• it may be difficult and time-consuming for us to locate suitable manufacturing equipment for our head manufacturing processes and replacement parts for such equipment.

If we do not adequately address the challenges related to our head manufacturing operations, our ongoing operations could be disrupted, resulting in a decrease in our revenue or profit margins and negatively impacting our operating results.

 
To develop new products, we must maintain effective partner relationships with our strategicmajor component suppliers.

     Under our business model, we do not manufacture any of the component parts used in our hard drives.disk drives, other than heads as a result of our acquisition of head manufacturing assets in July 2003. As a result, the success of our products depends on our ability to gain access to and integrate parts that are “best in class” from reliable component suppliers. To do so, we must effectively manage our relationships with our strategicmajor component suppliers. We must also effectively integrate different products from a variety of suppliers, each of which employs variations on technology, which can impact, for example, feasible combinations of heads and media components. We are currentlyIn August 2003 we settled litigation we were engaged in litigation with Cirrus which until this yearLogic, Inc., a supplier who previously was the sole source of read channel chipsdevices for our hard disk drives. As a result of the disputes that gave rise to the litigation, our business operations wereprofitability was at risk until another supplier’s read channel chipsdevices could be designed into our products. Similar disputes with other strategic component suppliers could adversely affect our operating results.

 
Our failure to timely and efficiently transition our enterprise resource planning software from the version we currently use to a new version could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We use enterprise resource planning software in the operation of our business and maintenance of business and financial data related to our daily operations. We are in the process of upgrading this software and we anticipate transitioning to new enterprise resource planning software during the next year. We may experience unexpected difficulties in transitioning to the new software, including difficulties related to the failure or inefficient operation of the new software. Such difficulties or failures could result in our inability to access business and financial information stored on the system or the loss of such information. Any inability to access, or loss of, such information could affect our daily operations, including our ability to ship products and invoice our customers, which could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our customers have adopted a subcontractor model that increases our credit risk and could result in an increase in our operating costs.

Some of our computer manufacturer customers (also referred to as OEMs) have adopted a subcontractor model that requires us to contract directly with companies that provide manufacturing services to our OEM customers. Because these subcontractors are generally not as well capitalized as our direct OEM customers, this subcontractor model exposes us to increased credit risks. Our agreements with our OEM customers may not permit us to increase our product prices to alleviate this increased credit risk. Any credit losses we may suffer as a result of this increased risk would increase our operating costs, which may negatively impact our operating results.

We have only one primarytwo high-volume hard-drive manufacturing facility,facilities and a secondary smaller facility,two facilities supporting our head manufacturing operations, which subjects us to the risk of damage or loss of either facility.any of these facilities.

     The majorityOur hard disk drives are manufactured in facilities in Malaysia and in Thailand. In addition, following our acquisition of ourhead manufacturing volume comes from oneassets in July 2003, we are operating a head wafer fabrication and research and

28


development facility in Malaysia. During 2002, we acquiredFremont, California and a second, smaller manufacturingslider fabrication, HGA and HSA assembly, and research and development facility in Thailand. A fire, flood, earthquake or other disaster, condition or event that adversely affects eitherany of these facilities or our Malaysia or Thailand facility or ability to manufacture could result in a loss of sales and revenue and harm our operating results.
 
Terrorist attacks may adversely affect our business and operating results.

     The terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the United States-led military response to counter terrorism and the continued threat of terrorist activity and other acts of war or hostility, including the war in Iraq, have created uncertainty in the financial and insurance markets and have significantly increased the political, economic and social instability in some of the geographic areas in which the Company operates. It is possible that furtherwe operate. Further acts of terrorism, may be directed against the United Stateseither domestically or abroad, could create further uncertainties and such actsinstability. To the extent this results in disruption or delays of terrorismour manufacturing capabilities or shipments of our products, our business, operating results and financial condition could be directed against properties and personnel of U.S.-owned companies such as ours.

26


adversely affected.

 
Manufacturing our products abroad subjects us to numerous risks.

     We are subject to risks associated with our foreign manufacturing operations, including:

 • obtaining requisite United States and foreign governmental permits and approvals;
 
 • currency exchange rate fluctuations or restrictions;
 
 • political instability and civil unrest;
 
 • transportation delays or higher freight rates;
 
 • labor problems;
 
 • trade restrictions or higher tariffs;
 
 • exchange, currency and tax controls and reallocations;
 
 • increasing labor and overhead costs; and
 
 • loss or non-renewal of favorable tax treatment under agreements or treaties with foreign tax authorities.

     Because we manufacture our products abroad, our operating costs are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Further fluctuations in the exchange rate of the Thai Baht, a floating currency, or a determination by the Malaysian government to repeg the Malaysian Ringgit or convert it to a floating currency, could result in an increase in our operating costs, which may negatively impact our operating results.

We have attempted to manage the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes by, among other things, entering into short-term, forward exchange contracts. However, those contracts do not cover our full exposure and can be canceled by the issuer if currency controls are put in place, which occurred in Malaysia during the first quarter of 1999.place. As a result of the Malaysian currency controls, we are no longer hedging the Malaysian currency risk. Currently, we hedge the Thai Baht, and British Pound Sterling.Sterling and the Euro.

There has been a trend toward a weakening U.S. dollar relative to most foreign currencies. If this trend continues the U.S. dollar equivalents of unhedged manufacturing costs could increase because a significant portion of our production costs are foreign-currency denominated. Conversely, there would not be an offsetting impact to revenues since revenues are substantially U.S. dollar denominated.

Unforeseen environmental costs could harm our operating results.

     We may be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products and making producers of those products financially responsible for the collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of certain products. Such laws and regulations have been passed in several jurisdictions in which we operate, including various European Union member countries. Similar legislation may be enacted in other locations where we manufacture or sell our products.

     We could incur substantial costs in connection with our compliance with such environmental laws and regulations, and we could also be subject to governmental fines and liability to our customers if we were to violate these laws. If we

29


have to make significant capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws, or if we are subject to significant capital expenses in connection with a violation of these laws, our financial condition or operating results could suffer.
 
The nature of our business and our reliance on intellectual property and other proprietary information subjects us to the risk of significant litigation.

     The hard disk drive industry has been characterized by significant litigation. This includes litigation relating to patent and other intellectual property rights, product liability claims and other types of litigation. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of litigation are inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. We may enter into settlements or be subject to judgments that may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are currently evaluating notices of alleged patent infringement or notices of patents from patent holders. We also are a party to several judicial and other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights. If we conclude that a claim of infringement is valid,claims or actions are asserted against us, we may be required to obtain a license or cross-license, modify our existing technology or design a new non-infringing technology. Such licenses or design modifications can be extremely costly. We may also be liable for any past infringement. If there is an adverse ruling against us in an infringement lawsuit, an injunction could be issued barring production or sale of any infringing product. It could also result in a damage award equal to a reasonable royalty or lost profits or, if there is a finding of willful infringement, treble damages. Any of these results would likely increase our costs and harm our operating results.

 
Our reliance on intellectual property and other proprietary information subjects us to the risk that these key ingredients of our business could be copied by competitors.

     Our success depends, in significant part, on the proprietary nature of our technology, including non-patentable intellectual property such as our process technology. Despite safeguards, to the extent that a competitor is able to reproduce or otherwise capitalize on our technology, it may be difficult, expensive or impossible for us to obtain necessary legal protection. Also, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition to patent protection of intellectual property rights, we consider elements of our product designs and processes to be proprietary and confidential. We rely upon employee, consultant and vendor non-disclosure agreements and contractual provisions and a system of internal safeguards to protect our proprietary information. However, any of our registered or unregistered intellectual property rights may be challenged or exploited by others in the industry, which might harm our operating results.

We are subject to risks related to product defects, which could result in product recalls and could subject us to warranty claims in excess of our warranty provisions or which are greater than anticipated due to the unenforceability of liability limitations.

27     We generally warrant our products for one to five years. We test our hard disk drives in our manufacturing facilities through a variety of means. However, there can be no assurance that our testing will reveal latent defects in our products, which may not become apparent until after the products have been sold into the market. Accordingly, there is a risk that product defects will occur, which could require a product recall. Product recalls can be expensive to implement and, if a product recall occurs during the product’s warranty period, we may be required to replace the defective product. In addition, a product recall may damage our relationship with our customers, and we may lose market share with our customers, including our OEM customers.

     The standard warranties used by us contain limits on damages and exclusions of liability for consequential damages and for negligent or improper use of the products. We record an accrual for estimated warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. We may incur additional operating expenses if our warranty provision does not reflect the actual cost of resolving issues related to defects in our products. If these additional expenses are significant, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

30


 
Inaccurate projections of demand for our product can cause large fluctuations in our quarterly results.

     If we do not forecast total quarterly demand accurately, it can have a material adverse effect on our quarterly results. We typically book andoften ship a high percentage (at times up to 58%in excess of 50%) of our total quarterly sales in the third month of the quarter, which makes it difficult for us to matchforecast our production plansfinancial results prior to customer demands.the end of the quarter. In addition, our quarterly projections and results may be subject to significant fluctuations as a result of a number of other factors including:

 • the timing of orders from and shipment of products to major customers;
 
 • our product mix;
 
 • changes in the prices of our products;
 
 • manufacturing delays or interruptions;
 
 • acceptance by customers of competing products in lieu of our products;
 
 • variations in the cost of components for our products;
 
 • limited access to components that we obtain from a single or a limited number of suppliers, such as Komag, IBM, Marvell, ALPS Electric Co., Ltd., STMicroelectronics, and IBM;SAE Magnetics Ltd., a subsidiary of TDK Corporation;
 
 • competition and consolidation in the data storage industry; and
 
 • seasonal and other fluctuations in demand for computersPCs often due to technological advances.advances; and
• availability and rates of transportation.

 
Rapidly changing market conditions in the hard disk drive industry make it difficult to estimate actual results.

     We have made and continue to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to our consolidated financial reporting. The rapidly changing market conditions with which we deal means that actual results may differ significantly from our estimates and assumptions. Key estimates and assumptions for us include:

 • accruals for warranty costs related to product defects;
 
 • price protection adjustments and other sales promotions and allowances on products sold to retailers, resellers and distributors;
 
 • inventory adjustments for write-down of inventories to lower of cost or market value (net realizable value);
 
 • reserves for doubtful accounts;
 
 • accruals for product returns;
 
 • accruals for litigation and other contingencies; and
 
 • reserves for deferred tax assets.

 
The market price of our common stock is volatile.

     The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, extremely volatile. Factors such as the following may significantly affect the market price of our common stock:

 • actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
 
 • announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors which may decrease the volume and profitability of sales of our existing products and increase the risk of inventory obsolescence;
 
 • new products introduced by us or our competitors;
 
 • periods of severe pricing pressures due to oversupply or price erosion resulting from competitive pressures;

28


 • developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights;

31


 • conditions and trends in the hard disk drive, data and content management, storage and communication industries; and
 
 • changes in financial estimates by securities analysts relating specifically to us or the hard disk drive industry in general.

     In addition, general economic conditions may cause the stock market to experience extreme price and volume fluctuations from time to time that particularly affect the stock prices of many high technology companies. These fluctuations often appear to be unrelated to the operating performance of the companies.

     Securities class action lawsuits are often brought against companies after periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. A number of such suits have been filed against us in the past, and should any new lawsuits be filed, such matters could result in substantial costs and a diversion of resources and management’s attention.

 
We may be unable to raise future capital through debt or equity financing.

     Due to the risks described herein, in the future we may be unable to maintain adequate financial resources for capital expenditures, expansion or acquisition activity, working capital and research and development. We have a credit facility, which matures on September 20, 2003.19, 2008, and planned capital lease facilities. If we decide to increase or accelerate our capital expenditures or research and development efforts, or if results of operations do not meet our expectations, we could require additional debt or equity financing. However, we cannot ensure that additional financing will be available to us or available on acceptable terms. An equity financing could also be dilutive to our existing stockholders.

Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Disclosure About Foreign Currency Risk

     Although the majority of the Company’s transactions are in U.S. Dollars, some transactions are based in various foreign currencies. The Company purchases short-term, forward exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for operating expenses and product costs denominated in foreign currencies. The purpose forof entering into these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the results of operations. AThe resulting impact from these hedge contracts is to offset a majority of the increases or decreasescurrency gains and losses in the Company’s local currency operating expenses are offset by gains and losses on the hedges.expenses. The contracts havecontract maturity dates that do not exceed threesix months. The Company does not purchase short-term forward exchange contracts for trading purposes.

     Historically, Currently, the Company has focusedfocuses on hedging its foreign currency risk related to the Singapore Dollar,Thai Baht, the British Pound Sterling, and the Malaysian Ringgit. With the establishment of currency controls and the prohibition of purchases or sales of the Malaysian Ringgit by offshore companies, the Company discontinued hedging its Malaysian Ringgit currency risk in 1999. Future hedging of this currency will depend on currency conditions in Malaysia. As a result of the closure of the Company’s Singapore operations in 2000, the Company has also discontinued its hedging program related to the Singapore Dollar. During the third quarter of 2002, the Company purchased a manufacturing facility in Thailand and began hedging the Thai Baht.

29


Euro.

     As of June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, the Company had outstanding the following purchased foreign currency forward exchange contracts (in millions, except weighted average contract rate):

              
June 28, 2002

ContractWeighted AverageUnrealized
AmountContract RateGain (Loss)



(U.S. Dollar equivalent amounts)
Foreign currency forward contracts:
            
 British Pound Sterling  2.0   1.52    
 Thai Baht  3.0   41.25    
              
July 2, 2004

ContractWeighted AverageUnrealized
AmountContract Rate*Gain (Loss)



Foreign currency forward contracts:
            
 Thai Baht $170.3   40.81   0.2 
 British Pound Sterling $2.0   0.55    
 Euro $1.4   0.81    


Expressed in units of foreign currency per dollar.

     In 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, total realized transaction and forward exchange contract currency gains and losses were not material to the consolidated financial statements and the carrying value of the contracts approximated fair value. Based on historical experience, the Company does not expect that a significant change in foreign exchange rates would materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

32


Disclosure About Other Market Risks

Fixed Interest Rate Risk

     At June 28, 2002, the market value of the Company’s 5.25% zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due in 2018 was approximately $83.0 million, compared to the related book value of $86.2 million. The convertible debentures will be repurchased by the Company, at the option of the holder, as of February 18, 2003, February 18, 2008, or February 18, 2013, or if there is a Fundamental Change (as defined in the Debenture documents), at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption. The payment on those dates, with the exception of a Fundamental Change, can be in cash, stock or any combination, at the Company’s option.

Variable Interest Rate Risk

     At the option of the Company, borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility would bear interest at either LIBOR (with option periods of one to three months) or a base rate, plus a margin determined bymargin. If LIBOR or the borrowing base. This isbase rate increases, the only debt which does not haveCompany’s interest payments could also increase. At July 2, 2004 the Company had a fixed-rate of interest. At June 28, 2002, there were no borrowings$50 million term loan outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility.

Fair Value Risk

     The Company owns approximately 1.0 million shares of Vixel common stock. As of June 28, 2002, the market value of the Vixel shares was $2.6 million. Changes A one percent increase in the market valuevariable rate of the Vixel shares are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in other comprehensive income (shareholders’ equity). As of June 28, 2002, a $2.6 million total accumulated unrealized gain has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. If the Company sells any portion of this common stock, the related unrealized gain or lossinterest on the date of sale will become realized and reflected as a gain or loss in the Company’s income statement. As a result of market conditions, the market value of the shares had declined from $2.6Senior Credit Facility would increase interest expense by approximately $0.5 million as of June 28, 2002 to $1.5 million as of September 20, 2002. Due to market fluctuations, an additional decline in the stock’s fair market value could occur.annually.

3033


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary DataFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

      
Page

Consolidated Financial Statements:
    
 32
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three Years Ended June 28, 200233
Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 28, 2002 and June 29, 200134
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency) — Three Years Ended June 28, 2002  35 
   36 
 Notes to   37 
38
39
40 
Financial Statement Schedule:
    
   5655 

3134


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Western Digital Corporation:

     We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Western Digital Corporation and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Western Digital Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 28, 2002July 2, 2004 and June 29, 2001,27, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

     As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of revenue recognition with respect to certain sales commencing on July 1, 2000.

 KPMG LLP

Orange County,Costa Mesa, California
July 29, 2004

35


     July 25, 2002WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

32

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions, except per share amounts)
               
Years Ended

July 2,June 27,June 28,
200420032002



Revenue, net $3,046.7  $2,718.5  $2,151.2 
Cost of revenue  2,585.1   2,275.6   1,869.6 
   
   
   
 
 Gross margin  461.6   442.9   281.6 
   
   
   
 
Operating expenses:            
 Research and development  201.0   134.7   120.1 
 Selling, general and administrative  105.7   121.4   110.8 
   
   
   
 
  Total operating expenses  306.7   256.1   230.9 
   
   
   
 
Operating income  154.9   186.8   50.7 
Net interest and other income  0.3   2.9   1.4 
   
   
   
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  155.2   189.7   52.1 
Income tax expense (benefit)  3.9   7.6   (1.1)
   
   
   
 
Income from continuing operations  151.3   182.1   53.2 
Discontinued operations        12.2 
   
   
   
 
Net income $151.3  $182.1  $65.4 
   
   
   
 
Basic income per common share:            
 Income from continuing operations $.74  $.93  $.28 
 Discontinued operations        .07 
   
   
   
 
  $.74  $.93  $.35 
   
   
   
 
Diluted income per common share:            
 Income from continuing operations $.70  $.89  $.28 
 Discontinued operations        .06 
   
   
   
 
  $.70  $.89  $.34 
   
   
   
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:            
 Basic  205.7   195.6   189.0 
   
   
   
 
 Diluted  216.7   205.5   193.7 
   
   
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

36


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions)
           
July 2,June 27,
20042003


ASSETS
 
Current assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $377.8  $393.2 
 Accounts receivable, net  313.1   243.9 
 Inventories  148.6   97.8 
 Other  17.8   9.2 
   
   
 
  Total current assets  857.3   744.1 
Property and equipment, net  274.7   122.1 
Intangible and other assets  27.2    
   
   
 
  Total assets $1,159.2  $866.2 
   
   
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Current liabilities:        
 Accounts payable $434.9  $352.3 
 Accrued expenses  90.4   112.4 
 Accrued warranty  46.4   41.0 
 Current portion of long-term debt  15.2    
   
   
 
  Total current liabilities  586.9   505.7 
Long-term debt  52.7    
Other liabilities  32.0   33.1 
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities        
 
Shareholders’ equity:        
 Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized — 5.0 shares;
Outstanding — None
      
 Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized — 450.0 shares;
Outstanding — 208.8 shares in 2004 and 203.6 in 2003
  2.1   2.0 
 Additional paid-in capital  698.7   676.6 
 Deferred compensation  (1.3)  (1.2)
 Accumulated deficit  (182.9)  (334.2)
 Accumulated other comprehensive income  0.2    
 Treasury stock — common shares at cost; 2.7 shares in 2004 and 0.7 shares in 2003  (29.2)  (15.8)
   
   
 
  Total shareholders’ equity  487.6   327.4 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $1,159.2  $866.2 
   
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY and COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
                                         
Retained
Common StockTreasury StockAdditionalEarningsAccumulatedTotalTotal


Paid-inDeferred(AccumulatedComprehensiveShareholders’Comprehensive
SharesAmountSharesAmountCapitalCompensationDeficit)IncomeEquityIncome










Balance at June 29, 2001.
  192.8  $1.9   (6.4) $(148.2) $735.4  $(3.7) $(581.7) $3.1  $6.8     
ESPP shares issued          1.3   13.9   (9.6)              4.3     
Exercise of stock options and warrants          1.6   34.3   (28.5)              5.8     
Shares issued in debenture redemption  2.6              13.6               13.6     
Deferred compensation plan, net          0.2   3.7   (2.6)  0.5           1.6     
Net effect of subsidiary equity transactions                  5.9               5.9     
Net income                          65.4       65.4  $65.4 
Unrealized loss on investment securities                              (0.5)  (0.5)  (0.5)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at June 28, 2002.
  195.4   1.9   (3.3)  (96.3)  714.2   (3.2)  (516.3)  2.6   102.9  $64.9 
                                       
 
ESPP shares issued  1.2      0.9   24.2   (17.0)              7.2     
Exercise of stock options  6.9   0.1   1.9   57.8   (20.8)              37.1     
Shares issued in debenture redemption  0.1              0.2               0.2     
Deferred compensation plan          (0.2)  (1.5)      2.0           0.5     
Net income                          182.1       182.1  $182.1 
Realized gain on investment securities, net                              (2.6)  (2.6)  (2.6)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at June 27, 2003.
  203.6   2.0   (0.7)  (15.8)  676.6   (1.2)  (334.2)     327.4  $179.5 
                                       
 
ESPP shares issued  2.2               9.8               9.8     
Exercise of stock options  3.0   0.1       0.7   14.7               15.5     
Deferred compensation plan          (0.1)  1.9   (2.4)  (0.1)          (0.6)    
Repurchase of common stock          (1.9)  (16.0)                  (16.0)    
Net income                          151.3       151.3  $151.3 
Unrealized gain on foreign currency contracts                              0.2   0.2   0.2 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at July 2, 2004.
  208.8  $2.1   (2.7) $(29.2) $698.7  $(1.3) $(182.9) $0.2  $487.6  $151.5 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

38


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
               
Years ended

June 28,June 29,June 30,
200220012000



Revenues, net $2,151,152  $1,953,392  $1,957,199 
Costs and expenses:            
 Cost of revenues  1,869,551   1,745,654   1,947,594 
 Research and development  120,128   113,382   150,658 
 Selling, general and administrative  110,797   115,832   126,986 
 Restructuring charges        85,837 
   
   
   
 
  Total costs and expenses  2,100,476   1,974,868   2,311,075 
   
   
   
 
Operating income (loss)  50,676   (21,476)  (353,876)
Net interest and other income (expense)  1,419   (53,115)  4,874 
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, extraordinary gain (loss), and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  52,095   (74,591)  (349,002)
Income tax benefit  1,140      19,500 
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary gain (loss) and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  53,235   (74,591)  (329,502)
Discontinued operations            
 Loss from discontinued operations  (12,291)  (45,168)  (25,413)
 Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  24,532       
Extraordinary gain (loss) from redemption of debentures  (48)  22,400   166,899 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     (1,504)   
   
   
   
 
Net income (loss) $65,428  $(98,863) $(188,016)
   
   
   
 
Basic income (loss) per common share:            
 Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary gain (loss) and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $.28  $(.44) $(2.69)
 Discontinued operations            
  Loss from discontinued operations  (.06)  (.27)  (.20)
  Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  .13       
 Extraordinary gain (loss)  (.00)  .13   1.36 
 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     (.01)   
   
   
   
 
  $.35  $(.59) $(1.53)
   
   
   
 
Diluted income (loss) per common share:            
 Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary gain (loss) and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $.28  $(.44) $(2.69)
 Discontinued operations            
  Loss from discontinued operations  (.07)  (.27)  (.20)
  Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  .13       
 Extraordinary gain (loss)  (.00)  .13   1.36 
 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     (.01)   
   
   
   
 
  $.34  $(.59) $(1.53)
   
   
   
 
Common shares used in computing per share amounts:            
 Basic  188,988   168,715   122,624 
   
   
   
 
 Diluted  193,708   168,715   122,624 
   
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

33


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
           
June 28,June 29,
20022001


ASSETS
        
 
Current assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $223,728  $167,582 
 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,573 in 2002 and $13,298 in 2001  218,832   127,767 
 Inventories  73,395   78,905 
 Prepaid expenses and other assets  11,554   11,455 
   
   
 
  Total current assets  527,509   385,709 
Property and equipment at cost, net  107,520   106,166 
Other assets, net  1,651   15,777 
   
   
 
  Total assets $636,680  $507,652 
   
   
 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
        
 
Current liabilities:        
 Accounts payable $302,998  $224,544 
 Accrued compensation  17,586   11,778 
 Accrued warranty  26,913   30,943 
 Other accrued expenses  58,975   73,081 
 Convertible debentures  86,204    
   
   
 
  Total current liabilities  492,676   340,346 
Other liabilities  41,142   38,629 
Convertible debentures     112,491 
Minority interest     9,383 
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities        
 
Shareholders’ equity:        
 Preferred stock, $.01 par value; Authorized — 5,000 shares;
Outstanding — None
      
 Common stock, $.01 par value; Authorized — 450,000 shares;
Outstanding — 195,438 shares in 2002 and 192,800 in 2001
  1,954   1,928 
 Additional paid-in capital  714,137   735,439 
 Accumulated deficit  (516,292)  (581,720)
 Accumulated other comprehensive income  2,559   3,112 
 Deferred compensation  (3,192)  (3,745)
 Treasury stock — common shares at cost; 3,295 shares in 2002 and 6,420 shares in 2001  (96,304)  (148,211)
   
   
 
  Total shareholders’ equity  102,862   6,803 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $636,680  $507,652 
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

34


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
(in thousands)
                                         
RetainedAccumulatedTotalTotal
Common StockTreasury StockAdditionalEarningsComprehensiveShareholders’Comprehensive


Paid-in(AccumulatedIncomeDeferredEquityIncome
SharesAmountSharesAmountCapitalDeficit)(Loss)Compensation(Deficiency)(Loss)










Balance at July 3, 1999
  101,908  $1,019   (11,297) $(193,042) $335,197  $(294,841) $(2,123) $  $(153,790)    
ESPP shares issued        1,236   10,660   (5,622)           5,038     
Exercise of stock options        288   2,572   (1,427)           1,145     
Shares issued in debenture redemptions  26,725   268         109,841            110,108     
Shares issued in equity facility sales  24,611   246         111,556            111,803     
Other shares issued  91   1         387            388     
Net loss                 (188,016)        (188,016) $(188,016)
Unrealized gain on investment securities                    3,490      3,490   3,490 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at June 30, 2000
  153,335   1,534   (9,773)  (179,810)  549,932   (482,857)  1,367      (109,834) $(184,526)
                                       
 
ESPP shares issued        1,199   11,232   (6,780)           4,452     
Exercise of stock options        854   8,546   (5,885)           2,661     
Shares issued in debenture redemption  15,970   159         95,315            95,474     
Shares issued in equity facility sales  23,495   235         110,239            110,474     
Issuance of restricted stock awards        1,300   11,821   (7,382)        (4,439)       
Amortization of deferred compensation                       694   694     
Net loss                 (98,863)        (98,863) $(98,863)
Unrealized gain on investment securities                    1,745      1,745   1,745 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at June 29, 2001
  192,800   1,928   (6,420)  (148,211)  735,439   (581,720)  3,112   (3,745)  6,803  $(97,118)
                                       
 
ESPP shares issued        1,343   13,893   (9,550)           4,343     
Exercise of stock options and warrants        1,557   34,357   (28,541)           5,816     
Shares issued in debenture redemption  2,638   26         13,559            13,585     
Issuance of restricted stock awards, net of forfeiture        225   3,657   (2,582)        (1,075)       
Amortization of deferred compensation                       1,628   1,628     
Net effect of subsidiary equity transactions              5,812            5,812     
Net income                 65,428         65,428  $65,428 
Unrealized loss on investment securities                    (553)     (553)  (553)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at June 28, 2002
  195,438  $1,954   (3,295) $(96,304) $714,137  $(516,292) $2,559  $(3,192) $102,862  $64,875 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

35


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)millions)
                
Years ended

June 28,June 29,June 30,
200220012000



Cash flows from operating activities
            
Net income (loss) $65,428  $(98,863) $(188,016)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities of continuing operations:            
 Gain on sale of discontinued operations  (24,532)      
 Loss from discontinued operations  12,291   45,168   25,413 
 Extraordinary (gain) loss on debenture redemptions  48   (22,400) ��(166,899)
 Depreciation and amortization  45,794   51,905   78,283 
 Non-cash interest expense  5,649   7,483   15,447 
 Non-cash portion of restructuring charges        56,301 
 Investment gains, net  (4,391)     (14,767)
 Non-cash adjustment to Komag investment and note     39,283    
 Other non-cash charges, net  2,000       
 Changes in assets and liabilities:            
  Accounts receivable  (90,529)  31,149   124,649 
  Inventories  5,427   1,804   46,639 
  Prepaid expenses and other assets  938   (134)  5,376 
  Accrued warranty  (5,058)  (18,095)  (3,099)
  Accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses  71,023   (90,463)  (104,911)
  Other  (1,337)  (5,685)  (1,137)
   
   
   
 
   Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations  82,751   (58,848)  (126,721)
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from investing activities
            
Capital expenditures, net  (47,743)  (50,683)  (21,442)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment        66,756 
Other investment activity  9,912   14,979   (12,867)
   
   
   
 
   Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities of continuing operations  (37,831)  (35,704)  32,447 
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from financing activities
            
Proceeds from ESPP shares issued and stock option exercises  10,159   7,113   6,183 
Repayment of bank debt        (50,000)
Cash used in debenture redemptions  (17,613)      
Common stock issued for cash     110,474   111,803 
Proceeds from minority investment in subsidiary  450      10,000 
   
   
   
 
   Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities of continuing operations  (7,004)  117,587   77,986 
Cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations  18,230   (39,474)  (25,838)
   
   
   
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  56,146   (16,439)  (42,126)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  167,582   184,021   226,147 
   
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $223,728  $167,582  $184,021 
   
   
   
 
                
Years Ended

July 2,June 27,June 28,
200420032002



Cash flows from operating activities
            
Net income $151.3  $182.1  $65.4 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:            
 Depreciation and amortization  101.7   50.4   45.8 
 In-process research and development expense  25.6       
 Loss on litigation settlement     18.5    
 Non-cash interest expense     3.0   5.7 
 Investment gains, net     (3.4)  (4.4)
 Discontinued operations        (12.2)
 Changes in:            
  Accounts receivable  (66.5)  (25.1)  (90.5)
  Inventories  (41.9)  (24.4)  5.4 
  Other assets  (9.4)  (0.3)  0.9 
  Accounts payable  54.3   57.8   80.0 
  Accrued expenses  (26.8)  14.8   (14.0)
  Other  1.7   4.5   0.7 
   
   
   
 
   Net cash provided by continuing operations  190.0   277.9   82.8 
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from investing activities
            
Capital expenditures, net  (131.7)  (61.9)  (47.7)
Asset acquisition and other investment activities  (94.8)  3.4   9.9 
   
   
   
 
   Net cash used for investing activities  (226.5)  (58.5)  (37.8)
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from financing activities
            
Issuance of common stock under employee plans  23.9   44.3   10.1 
Repurchase of common stock  (16.0)      
Debenture redemptions and extinguishments     (88.3)  (17.6)
Net proceeds from long-term debt  13.8       
Principal payments under capital lease obligations  (0.6)      
Other subsidiary financing activity     (5.9)  0.4 
   
   
   
 
   Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities  21.1   (49.9)  (7.1)
Net cash provided by discontinued operations        18.2 
   
   
   
 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (15.4)  169.5   56.1 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  393.2   223.7   167.6 
   
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $377.8  $393.2  $223.7 
   
   
   
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
            
Cash paid during the period for income taxes $3.1  $3.5  $2.0 
Cash paid during the period for interest $1.3  $  $ 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
            
Equipment additions funded by capital lease obligations $18.5  $  $ 
Common stock issued for extinguishment of convertible debentures $  $0.2  $13.6 

SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3639


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1.Note 1.     Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     Western Digital Corporation (“Western Digital” or the “Company”) has prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and has adopted accounting policies and practices which are generally accepted in the industry in which it operates. Following are the Company’s significant accounting policies:

Fiscal Year

     The Company has a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. In order to align its manufacturingThe 2004, 2003 and financial calendars, effective during the three months ended December 31, 1999, the Company changed its fiscal calendar so that each fiscal month ends on the Friday nearest to the last day of the calendar month. Prior to this change, the Company’s fiscal month ended on the Saturday nearest to the last day of the calendar month. The change did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. The 2002 2001 and 2000 fiscal years ended on July 2, June 27 and June 28 respectively. The year ended July 2, 2004 consisted of 53 weeks and the years ended June 29,27, 2003 and June 30 respectively, and28, 2002 consisted of 52 weeks each. All general references to years relate to fiscal years unless otherwise noted.

Basis of Presentation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounts of foreign subsidiaries have been remeasured using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. As such, foreign exchange gains or losses resulting from remeasurement of these accounts are reflected in the results of operations. These foreign exchange gains and losses were immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Monetary and nonmonetary asset and liability accounts have been remeasured using the exchange rate in effect at each year endyear-end and using historical rates, respectively. Income statement accounts have been remeasured using average monthly exchange rates.

Cash Equivalents

     The Company’s cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments, primarily money market funds and commercial paper, with original maturities of three months or less.

Concentration of Credit Risk

     The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets hard disk drives to personal computer manufacturers, resellers and retailers throughout the world. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and such losses have historically been within management’s expectations. At any given point in time, the total amount outstanding from any one of a number of our customers may be individually significant to our financial results. At July 2, 2004 and June 27, 2003, the Company had reserves for potential credit losses of $6.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively. The Company also has cash equivalent policies that limit the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or investment instrument and require that investments be made only with financial institutions or in investment instruments evaluated as highly credit-worthy.

Inventory Valuation

     Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is on a first-in, first-out basis for raw materials and is computed on a currently adjusted standard basis (which approximates first-in, first-out) for work in process and finished goods.

Property and Equipment

     The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. The majority of the Company’s property and equipment is being depreciated over periods of three and five years. Depreciation is

37


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

computed on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms.

Intangible Assets40

     Intangible assets are included in other assets and amortized over their expected useful lives or the lives of the related products. The Company reviews identifiable intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of an asset, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

     The Company adoptedrecognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB 101”), during its quarter ended June 29, 2001.. Under SAB 101 extends the point at which revenue is recognized when the title and risk of loss have passed to include the transfercustomer, there is persuasive evidence of arrangement, delivery has occurred, or services have been rendered, the risks of ownership. Generally, this occurssales price is determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized at the time of shipment for the Company’s OEMoriginal equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) customers, and at the time of delivery for its reseller customers. Accordingly, the Company changed its revenue recognition policy effective July 1, 2000 to recognize revenue on certain product shipments upon delivery rather than shipment. The accounting change resulted in a net increase to revenues for 2001 of $13.1 million, of which $16.9 million had previously been recorded in 2000. The cumulative effect on prior years’ net loss of this accounting change was $1.5 million.

     In accordance with standard industry practice, the Company’sCompany has agreements with certain resellers that provide price protection for inventories held by the resellers at the time of published list price reductions and, under certain circumstances,reductions. In addition, the Company may have agreements with resellers that provide for stock rotation foron slow-moving items.items and other incentive programs. Either party may terminate these agreements upon written notice. In the event of termination, the Company may be obligated to repurchase a certain portion of the resellers’ inventory. The Company recognizesrecords a reduction to revenue atfor estimated price protection and other programs in effect until the time of deliveryresellers sell such inventory to their customers. Adjustments are based on anticipated price decreases during the reseller holding period, estimated amounts to be reimbursed to qualifying customers, as well as historical pricing information. If end-market demand for hard disk drives declines significantly, the Company may have to increase sell-through incentive payments to resellers, and accrues for estimated pricing adjustments and sales returns.resulting in an increase in price protection allowances, which could adversely impact operating results. Net revenue recognized on sales to resellers was approximately $990, $1,016$1.5 billion, $1.3 billion and $881 million$1.0 billion for 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. Repurchases of reseller inventory were not material in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000.

2002.

Warranty

     The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs as products are sold. Warranty covers costcosts of repair or replacement of the hard disk drive duringover the warranty period, which ranges from 1one to 3 years.five years and is recorded in the accompanying balance sheet as current or long-term based upon when the expenditure is expected to occur. The Company has comprehensive processes with which to estimate accruals for warranty, which include specific detail on hard disk drives in the field by product type, historical field return rates and costs to repair. Although the Company believes that it has the continued ability to reasonably estimate warranty reserves, unforeseeable changes in factors used to estimate the accrual for warranty could occur. These unforeseeable changes could cause a material change in the Company’s warranty accrual estimate. Such a change would be recorded in the period in which the change was identified.

Advertising Expense

     Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company include advertising costs of $6.0, $7.4$1.5 million, $3.4 million and $9.0$6.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Income Taxes

     The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss (“NOL”)

38


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

carryforwards. The Company records a valuation allowance where it is “moremore likely than not”not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, are applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period of enactment (see Note 11).

enactment.

Per Share Information

     The Company computes basic income (loss) per share using the net income (loss) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed using the net income (loss) and the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive

41


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

potential common shares include outstanding employee stock options, employee stock purchase plan shares and restricted stock awards and common shares issuable upon conversion of the convertible debentures.awards.

     As ofFor the years ended July 2, 2004, June 27, 2003 and June 28, 2002, June 29, 2001 and June 30, 2000, 24.714.7 million, 23.319.9 million and 20.924.7 million shares, respectively, relating to the possible exercise of outstanding stock options were not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share. Also, for the same periods,year ended June 28, 2002 an additional 2.9 million 4.0 million and 8.4 million shares, respectively, issuable upon conversion of the convertible debentures, were excluded from the computation of diluted income (loss) per share. The effects of these items were not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation

     Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), establishes the financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based compensation plans. As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company elected to continue accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations (“APB Opinion No. 25”) and to follow the pro forma net income, (loss), pro forma earnings (loss) per share, and stock-based compensation plan disclosure requirements set forth in SFAS 123. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the past three fiscal years and illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

              
Year Ended

July 2,June 27,June 28,
200420032002



(in millions,
except per share amounts)
Net income            
 As reported $151.3  $182.1  $65.4 
 Stock-based employee compensation included in reported earnings  1.3   2.0   1.6 
 Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value based methods for all awards  (28.0)  (27.3)  (24.7)
   
   
   
 
 Pro forma net income $124.6  $156.8  $42.3 
   
   
   
 
Basic income per share:            
 As reported $0.74  $0.93  $0.35 
   
   
   
 
 Pro forma $0.61  $0.80  $0.22 
   
   
   
 
Diluted income per share:            
 As reported $0.70  $0.89  $0.34 
   
   
   
 
 Pro forma $0.58  $0.77  $0.22 
   
   
   
 

     The pro forma earnings per share information is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. This model also requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility and expected period until options are exercised (see Note 6)7 for additional information on fair value disclosures). The pro forma impact of applying SFAS 123 at July 2, 2004 is not necessarily representative of future periods.

42


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value for all periods presented because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the Company’s convertible debentures is estimated by reference to quoted information from market sources. At June 28, 2002, the market value of the Company’s convertible debentures was approximately $83.0 million, compared to the related carrying value of $86.2 million. At June 29, 2001, the market value of the Company’s convertible debentures was approximately $85.1 million, compared to the related carrying value of $112.5 million. The carrying amounts of all other financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair values.

Investments

Other Comprehensive Income

     The Company’s investments in unrestricted, marketable equity securities have been classified as “available for sale”, are included in other current assets, and are carried at fair value. The classification of a security is determined at the acquisition date and reviewed periodically. The Company regularly reviews the fair market value of the available for sale securities and records an unrealized gain or loss for any changes in the fair market value. Unrealized gains or losses are shown as a component of accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity. Securities that are not classified as “available for sale” are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The Company periodically reviews its investments for instances where fair value is less than cost to determine if the decline in value is other than temporary. If the decline in value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value. The amount of

39


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

any write-down would be included in the results of operations as a realized loss. Realized gains and losses resulting from the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that are recorded as an element of shareholders’ equity but are excluded from net income (loss).income. The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency contracts and marketable securities categorized as “available for sale” under SFAS 115.

SubsidiaryStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Transactions

During the periods presented, the Company’s new venture subsidiary, SageTree, Inc. (“SageTree”), received cash proceeds from unrelated parties in exchange for an equity interest in SageTree. As a result of the sale of stock to an unrelated party during 2002, the Company’s ownership percentage of SageTree decreased to less than 50% and the Company discontinued accounting for SageTree under the consolidation method. At the time the stock was sold to the unrelated party, the price was in excess of SageTree’s book value and, therefore, the Company’s net investment in SageTree increased. As SageTree was a newly formed development stage company, the increase was reflected in shareholders’ equity as a “subsidiary equity transaction”, in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 84.Securities.”

 
Foreign Exchange Contracts

     Although the majority of the Company’s transactions are in U.S. Dollars, some transactions are based in various foreign currencies. The Company purchases short-term, forward exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for operating expenses and product costs denominated in foreign currencies. The purpose for entering into these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the results of operations. As a result, a majority of the increases or decreases in the Company’s local currency operating expenses are offset by gains and losses on the hedges. The contracts have maturity dates that do not exceed threesix months. The Company does not purchase short-term forward exchange contracts for trading purposes.

     The Company applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The Company had outstanding forward exchange contracts with commercial banks for the Thai Baht, British Pound Sterling and the Thai BahtEuro with values of $5.0$173.7 million and $2.8$35.8 million at June 28, 2002July 2, 2004 and June 29, 2001,27, 2003, respectively. The Company has elected not to designate these forward exchange contracts as accounting hedges and any changesChanges in fair value on these contracts were recorded throughnot material to the results of operationsconsolidated financial statements for theall years ended June 28, 2002 and June 29, 2001.presented.

 
Use of Estimates

     Company management has made estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of certain assets and liabilities in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions have been applied using methodologies, which are consistent throughout the periods presented. However, actual results could differ from these estimates.

40


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
Reclassifications

     Certain prior years’ amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements

     During April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (“SFAS 145”). SFAS 145 rescinds SFAS 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt”, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as an extraordinary item. The Company will adopt SFAS 145 on June 29, 2002 at which time it will begin classifying gains and losses resulting from the extinguishment of debt as other income and expense, instead of extraordinary items. The adoption will not have a net impact on the Company’s results of operations or liquidity.

     On September 11, 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-15, “Determining Whether Certain Conversions of Convertible Debt to Equity Securities are within the Scope of FASB Statement No. 84, Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt” (“FAS 84”). The EITF deliberated this issue because of diversity in practice in the accounting for conversions of convertible debt to equity initiated by the debt holder. In practice, some registrants accounted for these transactions following FAS 84 while others followed Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 26, “Early Extinguishment of Debt” (“APB 26”). The EITF concluded that FAS 84 applies to conversions of convertible debt when the offer for consideration in excess of the original conversion terms was made by the bondholder. The EITF concluded that this guidance should be followed for transactions entered into on or after September 12, 2002. The Company’s previous extinguishments of its convertible debentures involving the issuance of stock have been accounted for under APB 26 whereby a gain on early extinguishment was recorded equal to the excess of the net book value of the indebtedness over the fair value of the consideration paid to extinguish the indebtedness. Following the guidance in EITF Issue No. 02-15, similar early extinguishments of the convertible debentures involving stock initiated by the debt holder will give rise to a conversion inducement expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued in excess of those required to be issued upon the exercise of the debenture conversion feature. The Company does not expect EITF Issue No. 02-15 to have a significant impact on the future results of operations because the Company does not expect to use stock to make early extinguishments of its convertible debentures.

4143


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 2.     Supplemental Financial Statement Data (in thousands)millions)

              
200220012000



Net Interest and Other Income (Expense)            
 Interest income $4,035  $7,154  $9,260 
 Interest expense  (8,127)  (8,743)  (19,153)
 Net realized investment gains (losses)  (4,216)  (337)  14,767 
 Minority interest in losses of consolidated subsidiary  727   1,215    
 Other gains (charges)(1)  9,000   (52,404)   
   
   
   
 
 Net interest and other income (expense) $1,419  $(53,115) $4,874 
   
   
   
 
Cash paid for interest $  $  $2,100 
   
   
   
 
Inventories            
 Finished goods $54,483  $48,123     
 Work in process  9,523   8,888     
 Raw materials and component parts  9,389   21,894     
   
   
     
  $73,395  $78,905     
   
   
     
Property and Equipment            
 Land and buildings $59,097  $54,060     
 Machinery and equipment  290,477   305,966     
 Furniture and fixtures  6,674   7,219     
 Leasehold improvements  11,195   10,818     
   
   
     
   367,443   378,063     
 Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (259,923)  (271,897)    
   
   
     
 Net property and equipment $107,520  $106,166     
   
   
     
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:            
 Common stock issued for redemption of convertible debentures $13,585  $95,474  $110,108 
   
   
   
 
 Redemption of convertible debentures for Company common stock, net of capitalized issuance costs $13,358  $117,874  $277,008 
   
   
   
 
 Settlement of accounts payable by transfer of cost method investments         $26,242 
           
 
 Transfer of Service Center assets in exchange for promissory note         $11,655 
           
 
              
200420032002



Net Interest and Other Income            
 Interest income $2.4  $3.8  $4.1 
 Interest and other expense  (2.1)  (5.3)  (8.1)
 Gain (losses) on investments, net     3.1   (4.2)
 Other gains(1)     1.3   9.6 
   
   
   
 
 Net interest and other income $0.3  $2.9  $1.4 
   
   
   
 
Inventories            
 Finished goods $70.6  $66.4     
 Work in process  51.6   19.6     
 Raw materials and component parts  26.4   11.8     
   
   
     
  $148.6  $97.8     
   
   
     
Property and Equipment            
 Land and buildings $73.0  $59.4     
 Machinery and equipment  521.2   342.4     
 Machinery and equipment recorded under capital leases  18.5        
 Furniture and fixtures  7.0   6.8     
 Leasehold improvements  28.8   11.6     
   
   
     
   648.5   420.2     
 Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (373.8)  (298.1)    
   
   
     
 Net property and equipment $274.7  $122.1     
   
   
     


(1) During the fourth quarter of 2001, as a result of Komag’s public announcement regarding its intention not to pay certain debt and interest amounts when due, and due to the market value trend of its common stock, the carrying amount of the equity investment in Komag was determined to have suffered an “other than temporary” decline in market value. Accordingly, the Company recorded nonoperating charges totaling $52.4 million to adjust the carrying values of equity investments in and notes receivable from Komag and to accrue for the contingent guarantees of the Komag equipment and facility leases. On August 24, 2001, Komag announced its voluntary Chapter 11 reorganization filing. During 2002, the Company sold its creditor position and remaining investments in Komag to an unrelated party for $9.0 million.

42Note 3.     Read-Rite Asset Acquisition

In June 2003, Read-Rite Corporation (“Read-Rite”), then one of the Company’s suppliers of magnetic recording heads, commenced voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. On July 31, 2003, Western Digital purchased substantially all of the assets of Read-Rite, including its wafer fabrication equipment in Fremont, California and manufacturing facility in Bang Pa-In, Thailand. The cost of the acquisition was $172.0 million and consisted of cash consideration of $94.8 million, assumed debt obligations of the Thailand operations of approximately $60.2 million and direct costs of the acquisition and other miscellaneous assumed obligations totaling $17.0 million. The Company accounted for this transaction as an asset acquisition. The estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows:

     
Current assets $17.4 
Property and equipment  90.2 
Purchased technology  38.8 
In-process research and development  25.6 
   
 
  $172.0 
   
 

44


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 3.     Convertible Debentures     As of the date of the acquisition, Read-Rite had two in-process research and Linedevelopment (“IPR&D”) projects: 120 gigabyte per platter and 160 gigabyte per platter products. The fair value allocated to these projects as part of Creditthe acquisition was $17.8 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The multi-period excess earnings method, a discounted cash flow income approach, was used to determine the value allocated to the IPR&D. The rate utilized to discount the cash flows to their present values was based on the weighted average cost of capital and an additional risk premium based on an analysis of the technology and the IPR&D stages of completion. Based on these factors, 27% was used as the annual discount rate. These acquired IPR&D projects had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, the Company recorded the $25.6 million as a charge to research and development expense at the time of the acquisition.

Approximately $38.8 million of the purchase price related to purchased technology, which is being amortized over a weighted average period of three years. During the fiscal year ended July 2, 2004, the Company recorded $13.2 million of amortization expense related to these intangible assets. Amortization expense is estimated to be $14.4 million, $4.4 million, $3.4 million and $3.4 million for fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

 
Note 4.Convertible DebenturesShort-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt

     The Company has zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due February 18, 2018 (the “Debentures”). The Debentures are subordinated to all senior debt; are redeemable at the optionShort-term borrowings and long-term debt consisted of the Company any time after February 18, 2003 at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption; and at the holder’s option, will be redeemed by the Company, as of February 18, 2003, February 18, 2008 or February 18, 2013, or if there is a Fundamental Change (as defined in the Debenture documents), at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption. The payment on those dates, with the exception of a Fundamental Change, can be in cash, stock or any combination, at the Company’s option. Alternatively, a holder may choose to convert debentures into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of 14.935 shares per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. Based on current forecasts, the Company now intends to satisfy the majority, if not all, of its put obligations in cash instead of common stock. Accordingly, the Debentures have been classified as a current liability at June 28, 2002. Debentures not put to the Company in February 2003, if any, will be reclassified as long-term debt.

     During 2002, the Company issued 2.6 million shares of common stock and paid $17.6 million in cash in exchange for Debentures with a book value of $31.6 million and an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $72.4 million. During 2001, the Company issued 16.0 million shares of common stock in exchange for Debentures with a book value of $120.3 million and an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $295.7 million. During 2000, the Company issued 26.7 million shares of common stock in exchange for Debentures with a book value of $284.1 million and an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $735.6 million. These redemptions were private, individually negotiated transactions with certain institutional investors and resulted in an extraordinary loss of $0.1 million during 2002 and extraordinary gains of $22.4 and $166.9 million during 2001 and 2000, respectively (see also New Accounting Pronouncements under Note 1).

As of June 28, 2002, the book value of the remaining outstanding Debentures was $86.2 million and the aggregate principal amount at maturity was $193.5 million. Debenture issuance costs are included in other assets and amortized over the term of the Debentures. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, approximately $0.4, $2.4 and $7.1 million, respectively, of unamortized issuance costs were netted against the extraordinary gain in connection with the redemptions. As of June 28, 2002 the balance of unamortized Debenture issuance costs was $0.6 million.following (in millions):

     
Term loan $50.0 
Capital lease obligations (See Note 5)  17.9 
   
 
Total  67.9 
Less amounts due in one year  (15.2)
   
 
  $52.7 
   
 
 
Line of Credit

     On September 19, 2003, the Company entered into a new $125 million five-year credit facility (“Senior Credit Facility”) replacing the facility that matured on September 20, 2003. The Company has a three-yearnew Senior Credit Facility that provides up to $125$75 million in revolving credit (subject to outstanding letters of credit and a borrowing base calculation), matures and a term loan of $50 million. Both the term loan and revolving credit facility mature on September 20, 200319, 2008, and isare secured by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory, 65% of its stock in its foreign subsidiaries and other assets. At the option of the Company, borrowings bear interest at either LIBOR (with option periods of one to three months) or a base rate, plus a margin determined by the borrowing base.margin. The Senior Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain certain amountslevels of tangible net worth,income, prohibits the payment of cash dividends on common stock, and contains a number of other covenants. The Senior Credit Facility replacedCompany was in compliance with all such covenants at July 2, 2004. The $50 million term loan was funded on September 22, 2003 and requires quarterly principal payments of $3 million beginning in October 2004. The Company used the proceeds from the term loan to repay obligations incurred as a previous facility that matured on March 31, 2000. Asresult of the date hereof,Read-Rite asset acquisition (see Note 3). At July 2, 2004 there were no borrowings under the facility. However,revolving credit facility and $71 million was available.

Convertible Debentures

     During 2003, the Company has issued a $25 million standby letter of credit under the facility to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (“Cirrus”redeemed its remaining outstanding 5.25% zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due February 18, 2018 (the “Debentures”) concerning $25and paid $88.3 million in disputed accounts payable. These disputed accounts payable have been recorded in the Company’s financial statements, but are partcash and issued 0.1 million shares of common stock. The book value of the Company’s litigation against Cirrus (see Note 5).redeemed Debentures was $88.6 million, and the aggregate principal amount at maturity was $193.5 million. During 2002, the Company paid $17.6 million in cash and issued 2.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for Debentures with a book value of $31.6 million and an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $72.4 million. The availability under the Senior Credit Facility has been reduced by a corresponding amount for the outstanding letter of credit.2002 redemptions were private, individually negotiated transactions with certain institutional investors.

4345


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 4.     Operating 5.     Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

     The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under long-term, non-cancelable operating and capital leases. The Company’s operating leases whichconsist of leased property and equipment that expire at various dates through 2010.2012. Rental expense under these operating leases, including month-to-month rentals, was $11.7, $15.4$14.9 million, $11.4 million and $17.8$11.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, 2001respectively. The Company’s capital leases consist of leased equipment. These leases have maturity dates through June 30, 2007 and 2000, respectively.

interest rates averaging 4.6%. Future minimum rentallease payments under operating and capital leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable operating leases aslease terms in excess of June 28, 2002one year at July 2, 2004 are as follows (in thousands)millions):

              
2003 $10,131 
2004 8,213 
OperatingCapital


20052005 7,061 2005 $9.8 $6.6 
20062006 7,004 2006 10.5 6.6 
20072007 5,508 2007 8.4 6.0 
20082008 7.8  
20092009 7.2  
ThereafterThereafter 19,559 Thereafter 13.7  
 
   
 
 
Total future minimum rental payments $57,476 Total future minimum payments $57.4 $19.2 
 
   
 
Less: interest on capital leases (1.3)
 
 
Total principal payable on capital leases $17.9 
 
 

Product Warranty Liability

The Company records a provision for estimated warranty costs as products are sold to cover the cost of repair or replacement of the hard disk drive during the warranty period. This provision is based on estimated future returns within the warranty period and costs to repair, using historical field return rates by product type and current average repair cost. Changes in the warranty provision were as follows (in millions):

          
20042003


Beginning balance $52.9  $47.4 
 Charges to operations  60.6   54.6 
 Utilization  (55.1)  (53.8)
 Changes in liability related to pre-existing warranties  (1.6)  4.7 
   
   
 
Ending balance $56.8  $52.9 
   
   
 

     The warranty provision includes amounts classified in non-current liabilities of $10.4 million at July 2, 2004 and $11.9 million at June 27, 2003.

46


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 5.6.     Legal Proceedings

     The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements relate to the Company’s legal proceedings described below. Litigation is inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. Additionally,On August 22, 2003, the Company may enter into settlements or be subject to judgments that may, individually orand Cirrus Logic, Inc. reached a settlement of litigation filed in California Superior Court for the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, resultsCounty of operations or liquidity. In addition, the costsOrange involving alleged breach of defending such litigation, individually or in the aggregate, may be material, regardless of the outcome. Accordingly, results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

     In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, lawsuitscontract and other claims including proceedings under laws and government regulations related to environmental, labor, product and other matters.resulting from Cirrus’ role as a strategic supplier of read channel devices for the Company’s hard disk drives. The ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact with respect to these matters at June 28, 2002, is subject to many uncertainties and is therefore not predictable with assurance. While these matters could affect the operating results of any one quarter when resolved in future periods, management believes that, after final disposition, any monetary liability or financial impactparties subsequently executed a formal written settlement agreement. Pursuant to the Company from these matters, beyond that provided at June 28, 2002, would not be material toterms of the annual consolidated financial statements. However, there can be no assurance with respect to such result. Where deemed advisable,agreement, on October 16, 2003, the Company may seek or extend licenses or negotiate settlements. Although patent holders often offer such licenses, no assurance can be given thatmade a one-time payment to Cirrus of $45.0 million in exchange for a particular case a license will be offered or that the offered terms will be acceptable to the Company.

     In 1992, Amstrad plc (“Amstrad”) brought suit against the Company in California State Superior Court, Countymutual release of Orange, alleging that disk drives supplied to Amstradclaims. The letter of credit previously posted by the Company in 1988 and 1989 were defective and caused damagesalso has been released. Western Digital had previously recorded an obligation totaling approximately $26.5 million related to Amstradthe disputed payables. The difference of not less than $186 million. The suit also sought punitive damages. The Company deniedapproximately $18.5 million between the material allegations of the complaint and filed cross-claims against Amstrad. The case was tried, and in June 1999 the jury returned a verdict in favor of Western Digital. Amstrad appealed the judgmentsettlement amount and the judgment awarding costsamount previously recorded was included in cost of sales for the fourth quarter and attorney’s fees to the Company. The Company and Amstrad have entered into a settlement agreement settling all claims between them relating to the litigation, andyear ended June 27, 2003. Formal dismissals of claims were entered with the appeals will be entered shortly.Court in this matter on October 22, 2003.

     In June 1994, Papst Licensing (“Papst”) brought suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement by the Company of five hard disk drive motor patents owned by Papst. In December 1994, Papst dismissed its case without prejudice. In July 2002, Papst filed a new complaint against the Company and several other defendants. The suit alleges infringement by the

44


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Company of seventeen of Papst’s patents related to hard disk drive motors that the Company purchased from motor vendors. Papst is seeking an injunction and damages. The Company filed an answer on September 4, 2002, denying Papst’s complaint. On December 11, 2002, the lawsuit was transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and included in the consolidated pre-trial proceedings occurring there. The lawsuit was stayed pending the outcome of certain other related litigation. The Company believes that the outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company intends to vigorously defend the suit.

     On July 5, 2001,In the normal course of business, the Company (and its Malaysian subsidiary) filed suit against Cirrus Logic, Inc. (“Cirrus”)is subject to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims. Although the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact with respect to these matters, including the matter described in California Superior Court for the County of Orange for breach of contractpreceding paragraph, is subject to many uncertainties and is therefore not predictable with assurance, management believes that any monetary liability or financial impact to the Company from these matters, individually and in the aggregate, beyond that provided at July 2, 2004, would not be material to the Company’s financial condition. However, there can be no assurance with respect to such result, and monetary liability or financial impact to the Company from these legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims resultingcould differ materially from Cirrus’ role as a strategic supplier of read channel chips for the Company’s hard drives. The Company also stopped making payments to Cirrus for past deliveries of chips and terminated all outstanding purchase orders from Cirrus for such chips. The Company’s complaint alleges that Cirrus’ unlawful conduct caused damages in excess of any amounts that may be owing on outstanding invoices or arising out of any alleged breach of the outstanding purchase orders. On August 20, 2001, Cirrus filed an answer and cross-complaint. Cirrus denied the allegations contained in the Company’s complaint and asserted counterclaims against the Company for, among other things, the amount of the outstanding invoices and the Company’s alleged breach of the outstanding purchase orders. The disputed payable, which is included in the Company’s balance sheet in accounts payable, is approximately $27 million. Cirrus claims that the canceled purchase orders, which are not reflected in the Company’s financial statements, total approximately $26 million. On October 9, 2001, the Court granted Cirrus’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, with leave to amend, and on November 8, 2001, the Company filed its First Amended Complaint. Cirrus demurred to the First Amended Complaint, and on December 18, 2001, the Court denied Cirrus’ demurrer. On November 2, 2001, Cirrus filed Applications for Right to Attach Orders and for Writs of Attachment against the Company and its Malaysian subsidiary in the amount of $25.2 million as security for the approximately $27 million allegedly owed for read-channel chips purchased from Cirrus that is disputed by the Company. On December 20, 2001, the Court granted Cirrus’ Applications but required Cirrus to post undertakings in the amount of approximately $0.5 million on each Writ before issuance. Pursuant to agreement with Cirrus, the Company posted a letter of credit in the amount of $25.2 million in satisfaction of the Writs. Discovery in the case is currently underway, and the Company expects that it will continue for the next several months.those projected.

Note 6.7.     Shareholders’ Equity

Equity Facility

     Under shelf registrations (the “equity facility”) previously in effect with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company issued shares of common stock to institutional investors for cash. Shares sold under the equity facility were at the market price of the Company’s common stock less a discount ranging from 2.75% to 4.25%. During 2002, the Company withdrew these shelf registrations. During 2001, the Company issued 23.5 million shares of common stock under the equity facility for net cash proceeds of approximately $110.5 million. During 2000, the Company issued 24.6 million shares of common stock under the equity facility for net cash proceeds of approximately $111.8 million.

Stock Reserved for Issuance

The following table summarizes all shares of common stock reserved for issuance at June 28, 2002 (in thousands):

Number
of Shares

Issuable in connection with:
Convertible debentures2,890
Exercise of stock options, including options available for grant42,340
Employee stock purchase plan1,592

46,822

45


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     The Company has an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) that operates in accordance with Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code whereby eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 10% of their salary to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at 85% of the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant or the exercise date, whichever is less. Approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock remain reserved for issuance under this plan. Approximately 1,343,000, 1,199,000 and 1,236,000 shares were issued under this plan during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

 Stock Option Plans

     Western Digital’s Employee Stock Option Plan (“Employee Plan”) is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”), which determines the vesting provisions, the form of payment for the shares and all other terms of the options. Terms of the Employee Plan require that the exercise price of options be not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options granted generally vest 25% one year from the date of grant and in twelve quarterly increments thereafter and have a ten-year term. As of June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, options to purchase 8,547,2339.1 million shares of common stock were exercisable and 10,553,3153.9 million shares were available for grant under this plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Employee Plan, participants are permitted to utilize previously purchased common stock as consideration to purchase additional common stock upon exercise of options or to exercise on a cashless basis through the Company designatedCompany-designated broker.

     The Company has a Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan (the “Broad-Based Plan”) under which options to purchase shares of common stock and stock awards may be granted to employees of the Company and others. This plan is intended to qualify as “broadly-based” under the New York Stock Exchange shareholder approval policy. The Compensation Committee determines the vesting provisions and other terms of the options and stock. To date, the options granted vest either one year,one-year, two years or four years from the date of grant. As of June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, options to purchase 6,213,9496.0 million shares

47


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

of common stock were exercisable and 1,695,7160.9 million shares were available for grant as options or stock awards under this plan.

     Under the Broad-Based Plan, the Company issued to certain employees 0.30.1 million and 1.30.2 million (net of cancellations) shares of restricted stock during 2004 and 2002, and 2001, respectively. No shares of restricted stock were issued in 2003. The stock issued in 2004 vests on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversary dates of the grant and the stock issued in 2002 vests on the second and third anniversary dates of the grant, provided that the recipient is still employed by the Company. The aggregate market value (net of cancellations) of the restricted stock at the dates of issuance was $1.3 million and $1.1 million for 2004 and $4.4 million for 2002, and 2001, respectively. These amounts have been recorded as deferred compensation, a separate component of shareholders’ equity, (deficiency), and are being amortized over the three-yearcorresponding vesting period.periods.

     The Company has a Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Director Plan”) and has reserved 2.6 million shares for issuance thereunder. The Director Plan provides for initial option grants to new directors of 75,000 shares per director and additional grants of options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock per director each year upon their reelection as a director at the annual shareholders’ meeting. Terms of the Director Plan require that options have a ten-year term and that the exercise price of options be not less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Options granted generally vest 25% one year from the date of grant and in twelve quarterly increments thereafter and have a ten-year term. As of June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, options to purchase 630,9410.7 million shares of common stock were exercisable and 1,038,8760.8 million shares were available for grant under this plan.

46The following table summarizes activity under the Employee, Broad-Based and Director Plans (in millions, except per share amounts):

         
Weighted Average
NumberExercise Price
of SharesPer Share


Options outstanding at June 29, 2001
  23.4  $7.69 
Granted  8.3   3.13 
Exercised  (1.3)  3.50 
Canceled or expired  (1.3)  8.46 
   
     
Options outstanding at June 28, 2002
  29.1   6.54 
Granted  5.6   4.61 
Exercised  (8.8)  4.19 
Canceled or expired  (0.9)  7.69 
   
     
Options outstanding at June 27, 2003
  25.0   6.89 
Granted  4.4   11.70 
Exercised  (3.0)  5.08 
Canceled or expired  (1.3)  10.94 
   
     
Options outstanding at July 2, 2004.
  25.1   7.75 
   
     

48


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     The following tabletables summarizes activity under the Employee, Broad-Based and Director Plans (in thousands, except per share amounts):

         
Weighted Average
NumberExercise Price
of SharesPer Share


Options outstanding at July 3, 1999
  17,726  $13.19 
Granted  13,485   3.82 
Exercised  (288)  4.10 
Canceled or expired  (10,022)  9.92 
   
     
Options outstanding at June 30, 2000
  20,901   8.83 
Granted  7,843   5.45 
Exercised  (854)  3.14 
Canceled or expired  (4,539)  10.02 
   
     
Options outstanding at June 29, 2001
  23,351   7.69 
Granted  8,271   3.13 
Exercised  (1,296)  3.50 
Canceled or expired  (1,274)  8.46 
   
     
Options outstanding at June 28, 2002
  29,052   6.54 
   
     

     The significant number of shares canceled or expired in 2000 was the result of terminations relating to restructuring and other attrition.

The following tables summarize information about options outstanding and exercisable under the Employee, Broad-Based and Director Plans at June 28, 2002July 2, 2004 (in thousands,millions, except per share amounts):

                                            
Options OutstandingOptions ExercisableOptions OutstandingOptions Exercisable




Weighted AverageWeighted Average
Range ofRange ofNumberContractual LifeWeighted AverageNumberWeighted AverageRange ofNumberContractual LifeWeighted AverageNumberWeighted Average
Exercise PricesExercise Pricesof Shares(in years)Exercise Priceof SharesExercise PriceExercise Pricesof Shares(in years)Exercise Priceof SharesExercise Price













$1.94 – 2.10 4,863 9.21 $2.10 311 $2.09 2.10 2.8 7.24 $2.10 1.6 $2.10 
2.21 – 3.27 2,679 7.53 2.86 1,871 2.81 2.21 –  3.50 1.8 4.74 3.12 1.6 3.14 
3.31 – 3.47 1,466 3.53 3.38 742 3.31 3.63 –  3.85 3.2 8.16 3.84 1.3 3.84 
3.63 – 4.43 3,699 7.15 4.27 2,341 4.31 3.88 –  4.87 2.7 6.05 4.43 2.3 4.44 
4.44 – 5.12 2,462 7.86 4.72 1,206 4.70 4.94 –  5.70 0.6 6.09 5.23 0.4 5.23 
5.13 – 6.00 5,219 8.35 5.93 2,032 5.94 5.72 –  6.00 2.9 6.27 5.98 2.5 5.99 
6.05 – 8.81 3,789 5.92 7.25 2,571 7.56 6.05 –  8.58 2.8 5.96 7.39 1.5 7.01 
8.87 – 12.87 3,046 5.39 11.91 2,560 11.94 8.63 – 11.88 2.8 4.93 10.47 1.9 10.63 
13.50 – 48.50 1,829 5.03 24.66 1,758 25.10 11.89 – 12.88 3.2 7.18 12.73 1.2 12.64 
 
 
 13.00 – 48.50 2.3 5.32 21.01 1.5 25.25 
 Total 29,052 7.15 6.54 15,392 8.47  
 
 
 
 
 Total 25.1 6.33 7.75 15.8 7.82 
 
 
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     The Company has an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) that operates in accordance with Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code whereby eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 10% of their salary to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at 85% of the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant or the exercise date, whichever is less. Approximately 5.4 million shares of common stock remain reserved for issuance under this plan. Approximately 2.2 million, 2.1 million and 1.3 million shares were issued under this plan during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Stock Reserved for Issuance

The following table summarizes all shares of common stock reserved for issuance at July 2, 2004 (in millions):

Number
of Shares

Issuable in connection with:
Exercise of stock options, including options available for grant30.7
Employee stock purchase plan5.4

36.1

     Pro Forma InformationFair Value Disclosures

     Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share is required by SFAS 123. This information is required to be determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options (including shares issued under the Stock Option Plans and the ESPP, collectively called “options”) granted subsequent to July 1, 1995, under the fair value method of that statement.statement (see Note 1 for further information on pro forma net income and earnings per share).

4749


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     The fair value of options granted in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002 reported below has been estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

                                              
Stock Option PlansESPP PlanStock Option PlansESPP




200220012000200220012000200420032002200420032002












Option life (in years) 3.0 2.5 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0  3.94 3.75 3.00 1.25 1.25 2.00 
Risk-free interest rate 3.37% 4.20% 6.15% 2.90% 4.20% 6.15% 1.65% 3.31% 3.37% 1.09% 1.93% 2.90%
Stock price volatility 0.88 1.05 0.83 0.88 1.05 0.83  0.75 0.88 0.88 0.77 0.88 0.88 
Dividend yield              

     The following is a summary of the per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted in the years listed below:

             
200220012000



Options granted under the Stock Option Plans $1.94  $3.86  $2.44 
Shares granted under the ESPP Plan $2.90  $4.65  $8.77 

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its stock option and ESPP plans and, accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for the options in the consolidated financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation expense based on the fair value at the grant date for its options under SFAS 123, the Company’s net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would have been as indicated below (amounts in thousands except per share data):

               
Year Ended

June 28,June 29,June 30,
200220012000



Net income (loss)            
 As reported $65,428  $(98,863) $(188,016)
 SFAS 123 pro forma adjustment  (23,091)  (29,779)  (39,783)
   
   
   
 
  Pro forma net income (loss) $42,337  $(128,642) $(227,799)
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) per share:            
 Basic as reported $0.35  $(0.59) $(1.53)
 SFAS 123 pro forma adjustment  (0.13)  (0.17)  (0.33)
   
   
   
 
  Pro forma basic income (loss) per share $0.22  $(0.76) $(1.86)
   
   
   
 
 Diluted as reported $0.34  $(0.59) $(1.53)
 SFAS 123 pro forma adjustment  (0.12)  (0.17)  (0.33)
   
   
   
 
  Pro forma diluted income (loss) per share $0.22  $(0.76) $(1.86)
   
   
   
 
             
200420032002



Options granted under the Stock Option Plans $6.56  $2.89  $1.94 
Shares granted under the ESPP $4.73  $2.64  $2.90 

     Stock Purchase Rights

     In 1989, the Company implemented a plan to protect shareholders’ rights in the event of a proposed takeover of the Company. Under the plan, each share of the Company’s outstanding common stock carried one Right to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (the “Right”). The Right enabled the holder, under certain circumstances, to purchase common stock of Western Digital or of an acquiring company at a substantially discounted price ten days after a person or group publicly announces it has acquired or has tendered an offer for 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On September 10, 1998 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the adoption of a new Rights plan to replace the previous plan, which expired in September 1998. The Rights under the 1998 plan were similar to the rights under the 1989 plan except they were redeemable by the Company at $.01 per Right and expired in 2008. In connection

48


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

with the establishment of a holding company structure on April 6, 2001, the Company terminated the Rights under the 1998 plan and adopted a new Rights plan. The 2001 plan is similar to the terminated 1998 plan, except that the exercise price was reduced from $150.00 to $50.00 per share, and the expiration date for the 2001 Rights plan was extended to April 2011.

Note 7.     Savings and Profit Sharing

Note 8.The Western Digital Corporation 401(k) Plan

     Effective July 1, 1991, the Company adopted a Savings and Profit Sharingthe Western Digital Corporation 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”) formerly known as the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan includes an employee 401(k) plan.Plan. The Plan covers substantially all domestic employees, subject to certain eligibility requirements. The Company may make annual contributions to the 401(k) plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. For 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002 the Company made contributions to the 401(k) plan of $1.4$2.9 million, $1.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Note 8.     Restructurings

     During 2000, the Company initiated restructuring actions to improve operational efficiency and reduce operating expenses. Charges related to these restructuring actions were accrued in the periods in which executive management committed to execute such actions. The restructuring actions taken in 2000 included the reorganization of worldwide operational and management responsibilities, transfer of hard drive production from Singapore to the Company’s manufacturing facility in Malaysia, removal of property and equipment from service, closure of the Company’s Singapore operations and closure of its Rochester, Minnesota design center. These actions resulted in a net reduction of worldwide headcount of approximately 2,000, of which approximately 540 were management, professional and administrative personnel and the remainder were manufacturing employees. These employees were given legally required notification and outplacement services. Restructuring charges recorded in connection with these actions totaled $85.8 million and consisted of severance and outplacement costs of $28.7 million, the write-off of manufacturing equipment and information systems assets of $56.3 million (taken out of service and held for disposal), and net lease cancellation and other costs associated with the closure of $11.0 million. Reducing these charges was the favorable settlement of lease commitments in Singapore of $5.3 million, favorable settlement of 1999 restructuring accruals of $1.8 million and a gain realized on the sale of the Tuas, Singapore facility, closed during 1999 restructuring actions, of $3.1 million. The restructuring effort was substantially completed by June 30, 2000. Of the charges related to the 2000 restructuring actions, approximately $30.5$1.4 million, was paid in 2000 and the remainder was paid in 2001. Also paid in 2000 was the remainder of the 1999 restructuring of $0.2 million.

49


respectively.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes the restructuring charges, the amounts paid and the ending accrual balances (in thousands) for the years ended June 30, 2000 and June 29, 2001:

              
Non-CashTotal
AccrualsChargesCharges



Balance at July 3, 1999 (from 1999 restructuring actions)
 $1,946         
   
         
Consolidation of Asian operations and closure of Rochester design center:            
 Fixed asset write-offs $  $56,301  $56,301 
 Severance and outplacement  28,679      28,679 
 Lease cancellation and other (net of favorable lease settlement of $5,252)  5,733      5,733 
   
   
   
 
   34,412   56,301   90,713 
   
   
   
 
Changes to 1999 restructuring estimates:            
 Gain on sale of Tuas building        (3,100)
 Favorable settlement of 1999 restructuring accruals  (1,776)     (1,776)
   
   
   
 
      $56,301  $85,837 
       
   
 
 Cash payments during 2000  (30,699)        
   
         
Balance at June 30, 2000
 $3,883         
   
         
 Cash payments during 2001  (3,883)        
   
         
Balance at June 29, 2001
 $         
   
         

Note 9.Note 9.     Business Segment, International Operations and Major Customers

     Segment Information

     As of June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, the Company operated in one segment, the hard disk drive business. The Company’s new business ventures have beenwere discontinued in 2002 (see Note 10).

50


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     International Operations

     The Company’s operations outside the United States include manufacturing facilities in Malaysia and Thailand as well as sales offices throughout Europe, and Asia. During 1999Asia and the first half of 2000, the Company also had manufacturing facilities in Singapore.Middle East. The following table summarizes the Company’s operations by geographic areas for the past three years. United States revenues to unaffiliated customers include export sales to international customers of $659.6, $512.6 and $505.8 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

     Transfers between geographic areas are accounted for at prices comparable to normal sales through outside distributors. General and corporate expenses of $47, $50 and $62 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000,

50

              
200420032002



(in millions)
Revenue from external customers(1):            
 Americas $1,261  $1,310  $1,160 
 Europe, Africa and the Middle East $901  $810  $703 
 Asia $885  $599  $288 
   
   
   
 
 Total $3,047  $2,719  $2,151 
   
   
   
 
Long-lived assets:            
 Americas $121  $16  $18 
 Europe, Africa and the Middle East $  $ —  $ 
 Asia $181  $106  $90 
   
   
   
 
 Total $302  $122  $108 
   
   
   
 


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

respectively, have been excluded in determining operating income (loss) by geographic region. Asia revenues and assets for the periods presented below consist primarily of the Company’s Malaysian operations.

                      
United
StatesEuropeAsiaEliminationsTotal





(in millions)
Year ended June 28, 2002
                    
 Sales to unaffiliated customers $1,703  $447  $1  $  $2,151 
 Transfers between geographic areas  433   0   1,891   (2,324)   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Revenues, net $2,136  $447  $1,892  $(2,324) $2,151 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Operating income (loss) $(21) $1  $108  $10  $98 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Long-lived assets $19  $  $90  $  $109 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Year ended June 29, 2001
                    
 Sales to unaffiliated customers $1,554  $397  $2  $  $1,953 
 Transfers between geographic areas  385   5   1,769   (2,159)   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Revenues, net $1,939  $402  $1,771  $(2,159) $1,953 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Operating income (loss) $(84) $2  $111  $0  $29 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Long-lived assets $45  $  $78  $(1) $122 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Year ended June 30, 2000
                    
 Sales to unaffiliated customers $1,462  $485  $10  $  $1,957 
 Transfers between geographic areas  479   3   1,858   (2,340)   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Revenues, net $1,941  $488  $1,868  $(2,340) $1,957 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Operating income (loss) $(296) $4  $(58) $58  $(292)
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Long-lived assets $100  $1  $65  $(2) $164 
   
   
   
   
   
 
(1) Revenue is attributed to geographic regions based on location of customer.

     Major Customers

     During 2002,2004, sales to Dell Computer accounted for 15%14% of the Company’s revenues andrevenue. During 2003, sales to Dell and Hewlett-Packard (including sales to Compaq Computer after its merger with Hewlett-Packard in 2002) accounted for 20% and 13% of revenue, respectively. During 2002, sales to Dell and Hewlett-Packard (including sales to Compaq computer prior to its merger with Hewlett-Packard in 2002) accounted for 15% and 13% of the Company’s revenues. During 2001, sales to Dell Computer accounted for 16% of the Company’s revenues and sales to Compaq Computer accounted for 12% of the Company’s revenues. During 2000 sales to Compaq Computer accounted for 21% of the Company’s revenues.

revenue, respectively.

Note 10.Note 10.     Discontinued Operations

     The Company acquired Connex, Inc. (“Connex”), a storage systems and solutions startup, in 1999. SANavigator, Inc. (“SANavigator”) was formed as a subsidiary of Connex in 2001 and developed and marketed storage area network management software.

     During 2000, the Company formed Keen Personal Media, Inc. (“Keen PM”), to develop and sell interactive personal video recorder and set-top box software, services and hardware for broadband television content management and commerce.

     In 2002, the Company discontinued Connex, SANavigator and Keen. The disposals have been accounted for as discontinued operations and, accordingly, the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented have been reclassified. In August 2001, substantially all of the operating assets of Connex were sold to

51


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Quantum Corporation for cash proceeds of $11.0 million, and in September 2001 substantially all of the operating assets of SANavigator were sold to McData Corporation for cash proceeds of $29.8 million. These transactions generated a gain of $24.5 million, net of costs incurred from the measurement date of July 1, 2001 through the end of the period to shutdown the businesses. At June 28, 2002, there were no remaining assets or liabilities attributable to any of the new ventures. At June 29, 2001, the net liabilities of discontinued operations, totaling $2.1 million, were included with other accrued expenses on the balance sheet and consisted principally of individually immaterial amounts of inventories, prepaid expenses, fixed assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses.

51


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

Note 11.     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 11.Income Taxes

     The domestic and international components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows (in thousands)millions):

                       
200220012000200420032002






United StatesUnited States $(56,530) $(214,817) $(214,316)United States $(44.2) $64.9 $(56.5)
InternationalInternational 120,818 115,954 6,800 International 199.4 124.8 120.8 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes $64,288 $(98,863) $(207,516)Income before income taxes $155.2 $189.7 $64.3 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

     The components of the income tax benefitexpense (benefit) are as follows (in thousands)millions):

              
200220012000



Current            
 United States $(3,124) $(1,800) $(15,302)
 International  1,667   1,620   2,623 
 State  317   180   179 
   
   
   
 
   (1,140)     (12,500)
Deferred, net        (7,000)
   
   
   
 
Income tax benefit $(1,140) $  $(19,500)
   
   
   
 
              
200420032002



Current            
 United States $1.8  $4.0  $(3.1)
 International  1.8   3.4   1.7 
 State  0.3   0.2   0.3 
   
   
   
 
Income tax expense (benefit) $3.9  $7.6  $(1.1)
   
   
   
 

     The tax benefits associated with employee exercises of non-qualified stock options, disqualifying dispositions of stock acquired with incentive stock options, and disqualifying dispositions of stock acquired under the employee stock purchase plan generally reduce taxes currently payable. However, no tax benefits were recorded to additional paid-in capital in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002 because their realization was not believed to be “moremore likely than not”.not. Consequently, a valuation allowance was recorded against the entire benefit. Benefits towhich may be recognized in the future related to stock option deductions are approximately $20.0$43.6 million.

     During 2002, the company received a refund of U.S. federal income taxes of $3.1 million. This refund was for alternative minimum taxes paid in prior years and was made in accordance with legislation enacted during 2002. During 2000, the Company reversed $19.5 million

Temporary differences and carryforwards, which give rise to a significant portion of tax accruals and certain deferred tax amounts. These accruals were previously established over timeassets and primarily related to unremitted income of foreign subsidiaries. However, based upon a review of the Company’s tax positions after the substantial international operations restructurings in 2000,liabilities at July 2, 2004 and due to the significant balances of net operating losses in recent years, the Company believed these accruals were no longer necessary.

     Income tax payments amounted to $2.0 million, $1.5 million and $4.6 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.June 27, 2003 are as follows (in millions):

           
20042003


Deferred tax assets:        
 NOL carryforward $240.5  $252.5 
 Business credit carryforward  47.5   40.4 
 Reserves and accrued expenses not currently deductible  68.3   66.2 
 All other  18.5   2.1 
   
   
 
   374.8   361.2 
 Valuation allowance  (374.8)  (361.2)
   
   
 
  Total deferred tax assets $  $ 
   
   
 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
 Unremitted income of foreign subsidiaries $9.3  $9.3 
   
   
 
  Total deferred tax liabilities $9.3  $9.3 
   
   
 

52


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Temporary differences and carryforwards, which give rise to a significant portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 28, 2002 and June 29, 2001 are as follows (in thousands):

           
20022001


Deferred tax assets:        
 NOL carryforward $234,046  $375,150 
 Business credit carryforward  44,183   42,680 
 Reserves and accrued expenses not currently deductible  82,952   101,189 
 All other  7,972   7,909 
   
   
 
   369,153   526,928 
 Valuation allowance  (369,153)  (526,928)
   
   
 
  Total deferred tax assets $  $ 
   
   
 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
 Unremitted income of foreign subsidiaries $9,016  $8,429 
 All other     1,333 
   
   
 
  Total deferred tax liabilities $9,016  $9,762 
   
   
 

Reserves and accrued expenses not currently deductible include the following (in thousands)millions):

                
2002200120042003




Sales related reserves and adjustmentsSales related reserves and adjustments $42,560 $46,263 Sales related reserves and adjustments $42.4 $43.3 
Accrued compensation and benefitsAccrued compensation and benefits 5,695 5,841 Accrued compensation and benefits 10.8 10.9 
Inventory reserves and adjustmentsInventory reserves and adjustments 1,993 3,552 Inventory reserves and adjustments 1.9 1.4 
Other accrued liabilitiesOther accrued liabilities 32,704 45,533 Other accrued liabilities 13.2 10.6 
 
 
   
 
 
Total deferred tax assets $82,952 $101,189 Total deferred tax assets $68.3 $66.2 
 
 
   
 
 

     During 2002, the Company repatriated a significant amount of prior years’ earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. As a result, there was a significant reduction in net operating loss carryforwards. The repatriation occurred following the enactment in 2002 of favorable but temporary U.S. tax law changes.     Remaining net undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries at June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004 on which no U.S. tax has been provided, amounted to approximately $110$401.3 million. The net undistributed earnings are intended to finance local operating requirements. Accordingly, an additional United States tax provision has not been made on these earnings.

     The Company determines deferred taxes for each of its tax-paying subsidiaries within each tax jurisdiction. The deferred tax assets indicated above are attributable primarily to tax jurisdictions where a history of earnings has not been established. The taxable earnings in these tax jurisdictions are also subject to volatility. Therefore, the Company believes a valuation allowance is needed to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is “moremore likely than not”not to be realized.

53


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Reconciliation of the United States Federalfederal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

                
200220012000200420032002






U.S. Federal statutory rate 35.0% (35.0)% (35.0)% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Current year U.S. loss not benefitted 0.0 76.1 19.3 
State income taxes, net 0.5 0.2 0.0  0.2 0.1 0.5 
Tax rate differential on international income (63.1) (42.7) 0.1  (43.8) (21.9) (63.1)
Tax effect of repatriation 272.2 0.0 16.9  0.0 14.7 272.2 
Utilization of NOL carryforward (218.2) 0.0 0.0  0.0 (23.5) (218.2)
Benefit from change in beginning valuation allowance (28.0) 0.0 0.0 
Tax accrual adjustment 0.0 0.0 (9.4)
Change in valuation allowance 8.7 (4.2) (28.0)
Other (0.2) 1.4 (1.2) 2.4 3.8 (0.2)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Effective tax rate (1.8)% 0.0% (9.3)% 2.5% 4.0% (1.8)%
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

     Certain income of selected subsidiaries is taxed at substantially lower income tax rates as compared to local statutory rates. The lower rates reduced income taxes and improved the net income or loss by $29$54.9 million ($.150.25 per diluted share), $30$33.6 million ($.180.16 per diluted share), and $19$29.3 million ($.150.15 per diluted share) in 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, respectively. These lower rates are in effect in Thailand through fiscal year 2004.2011 and in Malaysia through 2014.

     At June 28, 2002,July 2, 2004, the Company had Federalfederal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $595$603.0 million and $432$490.5 million, respectively. In addition, the Company had various Federal and state tax credit carryforwards of approximately $44.2 million. TheThese loss carryforwards are available to offset future federal and state taxable income through 20212022 and 2006,2014, respectively. TheIn addition, the Company had various federal and state tax credit carryforwards beginof approximately $47.5 million. Approximately $23.5 million of these credit carryforwards are available to expire in 2003.offset future taxable income through 2024, and the remaining $24.0 million are available indefinitely.

Note 12.     Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)

                  
First(1)(4)Second(2)(4)Third(4)Fourth(3)(4)




(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2002
                
 Revenues, net $440,943  $574,670  $594,867  $540,672 
 Gross profit  56,007   70,558   81,018   74,018 
 Operating income (loss)  (206)  12,852   20,801   17,229 
 Income (loss) from continuing operations  (557)  15,546   22,077   16,169 
 Gain (loss) from discontinued operations  21,075   (2,851)  (2,893)  (3,090)
 Net income  20,518   12,594   19,198   13,118 
 Basic and diluted earnings per share $0.11  $0.07  $0.10  $0.07 
   
   
   
   
 
2001
                
 Revenues, net $424,366  $561,570  $511,723  $455,733 
 Gross profit  25,936   67,541   63,295   50,966 
 Operating income (loss)  (33,376)  5,163   4,431   2,306 
 Income (loss) from continuing operations  (35,008)  6,002   4,469   (50,054)
 Loss from discontinued operations  (10,257)  (12,991)  (10,588)  (11,332)
 Net income (loss)  (35,526)  3,587   (5,748)  (61,176)
 Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share $(0.24) $0.02  $(0.03) $(0.34)
   
   
   
   
 

(1) During the first quarter of 2002, the Company sold substantially all the assets of Connex and SANavigator for cash proceeds of $11.0 million and $29.8 million respectively. The Company recognized

5453


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 12.a gainQuarterly Results of $24.5 million, net of costs incurred from the measurement date of July 1, 2001 through the end of the period to shutdown the businesses.Operations (unaudited)

                  
First(1)SecondThirdFourth(2)




(in millions, except per share amounts)
2004
                
 Revenue, net $714.2  $834.8  $748.9  $748.8 
 Gross margin  96.2   141.8   122.6   100.9 
 Operating income  4.9   71.3   48.9   29.8 
 Net income  5.0   68.8   47.9   29.6 
 Basic earnings per share $0.02  $0.33  $0.23  $0.14 
   
   
   
   
 
 Diluted earnings per share $0.02  $0.32  $0.22  $0.14 
   
   
   
   
 
2003
                
 Revenue, net $582.9  $749.5  $705.8  $680.3 
 Gross margin  83.6   144.1   122.0   93.2 
 Operating income  25.3   76.0   57.1   28.4 
 Net income  22.2   74.4   54.5   31.0 
 Basic earnings per share $0.12  $0.38  $0.28  $0.16 
   
   
   
   
 
 Diluted earnings per share $0.11  $0.36  $0.26  $0.15 
   
   
   
   
 

(1) The first quarter of 20012004 includes an extraordinary gain$50.4 million of $11.2 millionstart-up expenses and one-time charges related to the Company recognized for the redemption of debentures.Read-Rite asset acquisition.

(2) The second quarter of 2002 includes a $9.0 million cash recovery from its Komag note receivable and investment that were written off during the fourth quarter of 2001. Also during the quarter, the Company recorded a $5.52003 includes an $18.5 million non-cash loss on the write-downsettlement of certain cost-methodthe Cirrus litigation recorded in cost of sales and a $3 million gain on the sale of investments that were determined to be impaired.recorded in other income.

The second quarter of 2001 includes an extraordinary gain of $10.6 million the Company recognized for the redemption of debentures.

(3) During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded nonoperating charges of $52.4 million to adjust the carrying value of equity investments in and notes receivable from Komag and accruals of Komag contingent guarantees.
(4) The quarterly results presented have been reclassified to present the operations of Connex, SANavigator, and Keen PM as discontinued.

5554


WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

SCHEDULE II — CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Three years ended June 28, 2002July 2, 2004
(in thousands)millions)
                  
Allowance forAllowance for
DoubtfulAccrued
AccountsWarranty(1)


Balance at July 3, 1999.
 $18,537 $78,187 
Charges to operations 945 77,719 
Deductions (6,221) (85,341)
 
 
 
Balance at June 30, 2000
 13,261 70,565 
Charges to operations 1,218 39,736 DoubtfulAccrued
Deductions (1,181) (57,831)AccountsWarranty(1)
 
 
 

Balance at June 29, 2001
Balance at June 29, 2001
 13,298 52,470 
Balance at June 29, 2001
 $13.3 $52.5 
Charges to operations 3,441 46,527 Charges to operations 3.5 46.5 
Deductions (9,166) (51,585)Deductions (9.2) (51.6)
 
 
   
 
 
Balance at June 28, 2002
Balance at June 28, 2002
 $7,573 $47,412 
Balance at June 28, 2002
 7.6 47.4 
 
 
 Charges to operations 2.9 59.3 
Deductions (5.3) (53.8)
 
 
 
Balance at June 27, 2003
Balance at June 27, 2003
 5.2 52.9 
Charges to operations 1.2 59.0 
Deductions (0.3) (55.1)
 
 
 
Balance at July 2, 2004.
Balance at July 2, 2004.
 $6.1 $56.8 
 
 
 


(1) Accrued warranty includes amounts classified in non-current liabilities of $10.4 million at July 2, 2004, $11.9 million at June 27, 2003 and $20.5 million at June 28, 2002, $21.5 million at June 29, 2001 and $30.2 million at June 30, 2000.2002.

5655


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9.     ChangesNone.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

     The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and Disagreementsreported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

     As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with Accountantsthe participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on Accountingthe foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial DisclosureOfficer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the Company would meet its disclosure obligations.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information

     None.

PART III

Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the RegistrantDirectors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

     There is incorporated herein by reference the information required by this Item included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20022004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the captions “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended June 28, 2002.July 2, 2004, except that the information required by this Item 10 concerning executive officers is set forth in Part I of this report under “Item 1. Business — Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Item 11.Executive CompensationExecutive Compensation

     There is incorporated herein by reference the information required by this Item included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20022004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the captions “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Stock Performance Graph” and “Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements,” which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended June 28, 2002.July 2, 2004.

 
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     There is incorporated herein by reference the information required by this Item included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20022004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the captions “Security Ownership by Principal Shareholders and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information,” which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended June 28, 2002.July 2, 2004.

56


Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsCertain Relationships and Related Transactions

     There is incorporated herein by reference the information, if any, required by this Item included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20022004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the caption “Related Party Transactions,” which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended June 28, 2002.July 2, 2004.

Item 14.Controls and ProceduresPrincipal Accountant Fees and Services

     Not applicable.There is incorporated herein by reference the information required by this Item included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended July 2, 2004.

PART IV

 
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a) Documents filed as a part of this Report:

(1) Index to Financial Statements
     The financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this document are filed as part of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
(1) Index to Financial Statements

     The financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this document are filed as part of this Report.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

     The financial statement schedule included in Part II, Item 8 of this document is filed as part of this Report.

57


     All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.Notes.

     Separate financial statements of the Company have been omitted as the Company is primarily an operating company and its subsidiaries are wholly or majority owned and do not have minority equity interests and/or indebtedness to any person other than the Company in amounts which together exceed 5% of the total consolidated assets as shown by the most recent year-end consolidated balance sheet.

     (3) Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference, as specified below, from exhibits previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company shall furnish copies of exhibits for a reasonable fee (covering the expense of furnishing copies) upon written request to the Company’s Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices.

     
Exhibit
NumberDescription


 2.1  Asset Purchase Agreement between Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Read-Rite Corporation and PlanRR (US) Acquisition Corporation, dated July 24, 2003, including Option Agreements to purchase all of Merger to Formthe outstanding capital stock of Read-Rite International, Sunward Technologies International, and Read Rite Holding Company, dated April 6, 2001, by and among Western Digital Corporation, Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Western Digital Corporation) and WD Merger Sub, Inc.(21)Company(16)
 3.1  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Western Digital Corporation, filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 6, 2001(21)2001(7)
 3.2Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Western Digital Corporation, filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 8, 2002(15)
 3.3  Amended and Restated By-laws of Western Digital Corporation, adopted as of March 28, 2002(26)May 19, 2004†
 4.1  Rights Agreement between Western Digital Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, dated as of April 6, 2001, which includes as Exhibit A thereto the Form of Right Certificate to be distributed to holders of Rights after the Distribution Date (as that term is defined in the Rights Agreement)(21)(7)
 4.2  Form of Common Stock Certificate(1)

57


 
Exhibit
NumberDescription


4.3  Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Western Digital Corporation, dated April 6, 2001(21)2001(7)
 4.4Indenture, dated as of February 18, 1998, between Western Digital Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as Trustee(9)
4.4.1First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 6, 2001, between Western Digital Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A.(21)
4.7Western Digital Corporation’s Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture due 2018 and the Global Form of Western Digital Corporation’s Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture due 2018 (which is identical Western Digital Corporation’s Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture due 2018, except for certain provisions as marked)(9)
10.1.410.1  Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended on November 5, 1998(12)1998(3)*
 10.1.510.1.1  First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)2001(8)*
 10.2  Amended and Restated 401(k)Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan(5)*
10.2.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan, adopted as of March 28, 2002(26)dated April 6, 2001(8)*
 10.3  Western Digital Corporation 1993 EmployeeAmended and Restated Stock PurchaseOption Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective as amended on November 18, 1999(18)of May 25, 2000(8)*
 10.3.1  First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, dated April 6, 2001(8)*
10.4Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated April 6, 2001(23)(amended as of November 20, 2003)(19)*
10.5Amended and Restated Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Plan, effective as of November 14, 2002(13)*
10.6Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan, effective March 28, 2003(14)*
10.7Western Digital Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan(9)*
10.8Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, effective March 28, 2003(14)*
10.9Amended and Restated Executive Bonus Plan, effective March 28, 2003(14)*
 10.10  Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation401(k) Plan, adopted May 31, 2002*†as of March 28, 2002(11)*
10.10.1First Amendment to Western Digital Corporation 401(k) Plan, effective as of July 1, 2002(13)*
 10.11  Amended and RestatedWestern Digital Corporation Executive Bonus Plan, adopted May 31, 2002*†Retention Plan(2)*
 10.12  Amended and Restated Long-Term Retention Agreement, between Western Digital Corporation Extended Severance Plan,and Matthew E. Massengill, effective January 18, 1990(2)as of December 20, 2002(13)*
 10.12.110.13  Amendment No. 1 to theAmended and Restated Long-Term Retention Agreement, between Western Digital Corporation Extended Severance Plan,and Arif Shakeel, effective September 1, 1995(5)as of December 20, 2002(13)*
 10.12.210.14  Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, effective December 1, 1999(4)*
10.14.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, dated April 6, 2001(8)*
10.15Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Plan, effective March 29, 2001(22)2001(13)*
10.16Letter agreement, dated October 19, 2001, by and between Western Digital Corporation and D. Scott Mercer(10)*
10.17Letter agreement, dated September 10, 2004, by and between Western Digital Technologies, Inc. and Stephen D. Milligan†*
10.18Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors of Western Digital Corporation(12) 
10.19Form of Indemnity Agreement for Officers of Western Digital Corporation(12) 
10.20Sublease, dated as of September 23, 2003, by and between Advanced Logic Research, Inc. and Western Digital Corporation†
10.21Lease by and between Serrano Jack, L.L.C. and Western Digital Corporation, dated May 30, 2000(6)
10.22Standard Industrial/ Commercial Single-Tenant Lease and Addendum No. 1, dated May 1, 2000, between One Morgan, LLC and Western Digital Corporation(18)
10.23Lease Agreement, dated June 3, 1996, together with First Amendment, between South Bay/ Edenvale Associates and Western Digital Corporation(18)

58


     
Exhibit
NumberDescription


 10.16.110.24Single Tenant Industrial Lease Agreement, dated as of August 24, 1992, between Shuwa Investments Corporation and Read-Rite Corporation, together with Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of May 28, 2002(18)
10.25Supply Agreement for the Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products, dated June 13, 2002, among Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. and Western Digital Technologies, Inc.(14)(17)
10.26  Amended and Restated Western Digital Corporation Long-Term Retention Plan, as amended and restated on July 10, 1997(8)*
10.16.2Western Digital Corporation Executive Retention Plan(11)*
10.21Amended and Restated Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Plan, effective as of January 27, 2000(23)*
10.21.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
10.23Lease by and between Serrano Jack, L.L.C., and Western Digital Corporation, dated May 30, 2000(19)
10.30Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan(3)*
10.31First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated June 30, 1995(3)*
10.32Second Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated March 27, 1996(4)*
10.32.1Third Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 1997(6)*
10.32.2Fourth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective June 23, 1995(7)*
10.32.3Fifth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated November 13, 1997(10)*
10.32.4Sixth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 2000(16)*
10.32.5Seventh Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 2000(16)*
10.32.6Eighth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
10.33Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of May 25, 2000(23)*
10.33.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
10.34Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan(16)*
10.34.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
10.35.1Western Digital Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan(24)*
10.36Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Western Digital Corporation), dated February 7, 2001§†
10.36.1Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Western Digital Corporation), dated as of December 18, 2001§†
10.36.2Amendment 2 to the Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc., effective as of June 19, 2002†

59


Exhibit
NumberDescription


10.36.3Third Amended and Restated Attachment No. 1 to the Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc., dated as of June 19, 2002§†
10.40OEM Component Supply and Technology License Agreement, dated June 7, 1998, between Western Digital Corporation and IBM Corporation(10)(13)
10.41OEM Sales and Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 1998, between Western Digital Corporation and IBM Corporation(10)(13)
10.42Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 8, 1999, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Komag, Inc.(14)(17)
10.43Volume Purchase Agreement, dated April 8, 1999, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Komag, Inc.(14)(17)
10.43.1Amendment No. 1 to Volume Purchase Agreement by and between Western Digital Corporation and Komag, Inc., effective October 5, 2001(24)
10.45Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, effective December 1, 1999(15)*
10.45.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
10.46Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement, dated February 23, 2000, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Mayo Foundation(16)
10.47Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2000,19, 2003, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the other credit parties identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.(20)§ 
 10.47.1First Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated March 8, 2001(23)
10.47.2Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of March 23, 2001(23)
10.47.3Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of April 7, 2001(23)
10.47.4Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of September 26, 2001(24)
10.47.5Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of December 21, 2001(25)§
10.47.6Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of January 11, 2002(26)
10.47.7Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of June 28, 2002†
10.4810.27  Continuing Guaranty, between Western Digital Corporation and General Electric Capital Corporation, dated as of April 7, 2001(23)2001(8)

60


 10.28  
Exhibit
NumberDescription


10.54Letter agreement,Master Equipment Lease Agreement dated October 19, 2001, byJune 24, 2004 between CIT Technologies Corporation, doing business as CIT Systems Leasing, and between Western Digital Corporation and D. Scott Mercer(25)
10.55Letter agreement, dated March 31, 2002, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Michael A. Cornelius†Technologies, Inc.†
 21  Subsidiaries of Western Digital Corporation†
 23  Consent of Independent Auditors†Registered Public Accounting Firm†
 99.131.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuantpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
 99.232.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuantpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
99.3Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings†
99.4Statement Under Oath of Principal Financial Officer Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings†

     †     New exhibit filed with this Report.

     *Compensation plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     §Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  (1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-B, filed April 13, 1987.
  (2) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 1994.
  (3) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 1995.
  (4) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 1996.
  (5) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 1996.
  (6) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 1997.
  (7) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 1997.
  (8) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 1997.
  (9) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-52463), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 1998.

(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 1998.
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 1998.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 1999.
(13) Subject to confidentiality order dated October 2, 1998.

61


(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1, 1999.
(15) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2000.
(16) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2000.
(17) Subject to confidentiality order dated June 27, 2000.
(18) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-95499), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2000.
(19) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2000.
(20) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2000.
(21) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2001.
(22) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2001.
(23) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2001.
(24) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001.
(25) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002.
(26) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

     None.

62


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ D. SCOTT MERCER

D. Scott Mercer
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 25, 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on September 25, 2002.

SignatureTitle


/s/ MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL

Matthew E. Massengill
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ D. SCOTT MERCER

D. Scott Mercer
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ JOSEPH R. CARRILLO

Joseph R. Carrillo
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ PETER D. BEHRENDT

Peter D. Behrendt
Director
/s/ I. M. BOOTH

I. M. Booth
Director
/s/ KATHLEEN A. COTE

Kathleen A. Cote
Director
/s/ HENRY T. DENERO

Henry T. DeNero
Director


Michael D. Lambert
Director
/s/ ROGER H. MOORE

Roger H. Moore
Director
/s/ THOMAS E. PARDUN

Thomas E. Pardun
Director

63


CERTIFICATION

     Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Western Digital Corporation provides the following certifications required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and 17 C.F.R. §240.13a-14.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

     I, Matthew E. Massengill, certify that:

• I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Digital Corporation;
• Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; and
• Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report.

Dated: September 25, 2002

/s/ MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL
_________________________________________
Matthew E. Massengill
Chief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

     I, D. Scott Mercer, certify that:

• I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Digital Corporation;
• Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; and
• Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report.

Dated: September 25, 2002

/s/ D. SCOTT MERCER
_________________________________________
D. Scott Mercer
Chief Financial Officer

64


EXHIBIT INDEX

     
Exhibit
NumberDescription


 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger to Form Holding Company, dated April 6, 2001, by and among Western Digital Corporation, Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Western Digital Corporation) and WD Merger Sub, Inc.(21)
 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Western Digital Corporation, filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 6, 2001(21)
 3.2 Amended and Restated By-laws of Western Digital Corporation, adopted as of March 28, 2002(26)
 4.1 Rights Agreement between Western Digital Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, dated as of April 6, 2001, which includes as Exhibit A thereto the Form of Right Certificate to be distributed to holders of Rights after the Distribution Date (as that term is defined in the Rights Agreement)(21)
 4.2 Form of Common Stock Certificate(1)
 4.3 Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Western Digital Corporation, dated April 6, 2001(21)
 4.4 Indenture, dated as of February 18, 1998, between Western Digital Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as Trustee(9)
 4.4.1 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 6, 2001, between Western Digital Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A.(21)
 4.7 Western Digital Corporation’s Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture due 2018 and the Global Form of Western Digital Corporation’s Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture due 2018 (which is identical Western Digital Corporation’s Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture due 2018, except for certain provisions as marked)(9)
 10.1.4 Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended on November 5, 1998(12)*
 10.1.5 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
 10.2 Amended and Restated 401(k) Plan, adopted as of March 28, 2002(26)
 10.3 Western Digital Corporation 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended on November 18, 1999(18)*
 10.3.1 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
 10.10 Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, adopted May 31, 2002*†
 10.11 Amended and Restated Executive Bonus Plan, adopted May 31, 2002*†
 10.12 Western Digital Corporation Extended Severance Plan, effective January 18, 1990(2)*
 10.12.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Western Digital Corporation Extended Severance Plan, effective September 1, 1995(5)*
 10.12.2 Western Digital Corporation Change of Control Severance Plan, effective March 29, 2001(22)*
 10.16.1 Amended and Restated Western Digital Corporation Long-Term Retention Plan, as amended and restated on July 10, 1997(8)*
 10.16.2 Western Digital Corporation Executive Retention Plan(11)*
 10.21 Amended and Restated Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Plan, effective as of January 27, 2000(23)*
 10.21.1 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*


     
Exhibit
NumberDescription


 10.23 Lease by and between Serrano Jack, L.L.C., and Western Digital Corporation, dated May 30, 2000(19)
 10.30 Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan(3)*
 10.31 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated June 30, 1995(3)*
 10.32 Second Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated March 27, 1996(4)*
 10.32.1 Third Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 1997(6)*
 10.32.2 Fourth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective June 23, 1995(7)*
 10.32.3 Fifth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated November 13, 1997(10)*
 10.32.4 Sixth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 2000(16)*
 10.32.5 Seventh Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 2000(16)*
 10.32.6 Eighth Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
 10.33 Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of May 25, 2000(23)*
 10.33.1 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
 10.34 Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan(16)*
 10.34.1 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
 10.35.1 Western Digital Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan(24)*
 10.36 Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Western Digital Corporation), dated February 7, 2001§†
 10.36.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Western Digital Corporation), dated as of December 18, 2001§†
 10.36.2 Amendment 2 to the Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc., effective as of June 19, 2002†
 10.36.3 Third Amended and Restated Attachment No. 1 to the Agreement for Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products between International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc., dated as of June 19, 2002§†
 10.40 OEM Component Supply and Technology License Agreement, dated June 7, 1998, between Western Digital Corporation and IBM Corporation(10)(13)
 10.41 OEM Sales and Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 1998, between Western Digital Corporation and IBM Corporation(10)(13)
 10.42 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 8, 1999, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Komag, Inc.(14)(17)
 10.43 Volume Purchase Agreement, dated April 8, 1999, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Komag, Inc.(14)(17)


     
Exhibit
NumberDescription


 10.43.1 Amendment No. 1 to Volume Purchase Agreement by and between Western Digital Corporation and Komag, Inc., effective October 5, 2001(24)
 10.45 Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, effective December 1, 1999(15)*
 10.45.1 First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, dated April 6, 2001(23)*
 10.46 Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement, dated February 23, 2000, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Mayo Foundation(16)
 10.47 Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2000, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the other credit parties identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.(20)
 10.47.1 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated March 8, 2001(23)
 10.47.2 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of March 23, 2001(23)
 10.47.3 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of April 7, 2001(23)
 10.47.4 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of September 26, 2001(24)
 10.47.5 Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of December 21, 2001(25)§
 10.47.6 Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of January 11, 2002(26)
 10.47.7 Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the lenders identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of June 28, 2002†
 10.48 Continuing Guaranty, between Western Digital Corporation and General Electric Capital Corporation, dated as of April 7, 2001(23)
 10.54 Letter agreement, dated October 19, 2001, by and between Western Digital Corporation and D. Scott Mercer(25)
 10.55 Letter agreement, dated March 31, 2002, by and between Western Digital Corporation and Michael A. Cornelius†
 21  Subsidiaries of Western Digital Corporation†
 23  Consent of Independent Auditors†
 99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
 99.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
 99.3 Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings†


     
Exhibit
NumberDescription


 99.4 Statement Under Oath of Principal Financial Officer Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings†

     †New exhibit filed with this Report.

     *Compensation plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     §Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-B, filed April 13, 1987.
 
(2)Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 1994.
  (3) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 1995.
  (4) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 1996.
  (5) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 1996.
  (6) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 1997.
  (7) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 1997.
  (8) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 1997.
  (9) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-52463), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 1998.

(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 1998.
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 1998.
 
(12)(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 1999.
 
(13) Subject to confidentiality order dated October 2, 1998.
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1, 1999.
(15)(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2000.
 
(16)(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2000.
 
(17) Subject to confidentiality order dated June 27, 2000.
(18) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-95499), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2000.
(19)(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2000.
 
(20) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2000.


(21)(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2001.
 
(22) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2001.
(23)(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2001.
 
(24)(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001.

(25)(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002.
 
(26)(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2002.

59


(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2002.
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2003.
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2003.
(15) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-107227), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2003.
(16) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2003.
(17) Subject to confidentiality order dated September 5, 2003.
(18) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003.
(19) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2003.
(20) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2003.

60


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ STEPHEN D. MILLIGAN

Stephen D. Milligan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 13, 2004

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate



/s/ MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL

Matthew E. Massengill
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)September 13, 2004
/s/ STEPHEN D. MILLIGAN

Stephen D. Milligan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)September 13, 2004
/s/ JOSEPH R. CARRILLO

Joseph R. Carrillo
Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)September 13, 2004
/s/ PETER D. BEHRENDT

Peter D. Behrendt
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ I. M. BOOTH

I. M. Booth
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ KATHLEEN A. COTE

Kathleen A. Cote
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ HENRY T. DENERO

Henry T. DeNero
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ WILLIAM L. KIMSEY

William L. Kimsey
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ MICHAEL D. LAMBERT

Michael D. Lambert
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ ROGER H. MOORE

Roger H. Moore
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004
/s/ THOMAS E. PARDUN

Thomas E. Pardun
DirectorSeptember 13, 2004

61


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
NumberDescription


 2.1Asset Purchase Agreement between Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Read-Rite Corporation and RR (US) Acquisition Corporation, dated July 24, 2003, including Option Agreements to purchase all of the outstanding capital stock of Read-Rite International, Sunward Technologies International, and Read Rite Holding Company(16)
 3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Western Digital Corporation, filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 6, 2001(7)
 3.2Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Western Digital Corporation, filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 8, 2002(15)
 3.3Amended and Restated By-laws of Western Digital Corporation, adopted as of May 19, 2004†
 4.1Rights Agreement between Western Digital Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, dated as of April 6, 2001, which includes as Exhibit A thereto the Form of Right Certificate to be distributed to holders of Rights after the Distribution Date (as that term is defined in the Rights Agreement)(7)
 4.2Form of Common Stock Certificate(1)
 4.3Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Western Digital Corporation, dated April 6, 2001(7)
10.1Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended on November 5, 1998(3)*
10.1.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan, dated April 6, 2001(8)*
10.2Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan(5)*
10.2.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Broad-Based Stock Incentive Plan, dated April 6, 2001(8)*
10.3Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of May 25, 2000(8)*
10.3.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, dated April 6, 2001(8)*
10.4Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (amended as of November 20, 2003)(19)*
10.5Amended and Restated Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Plan, effective as of November 14, 2002(13)*
10.6Western Digital Corporation Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan, effective March 28, 2003(14)*
10.7Western Digital Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan(9)*
10.8Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, effective March 28, 2003(14)*
10.9Amended and Restated Executive Bonus Plan, effective March 28, 2003(14)*
10.10Amended and Restated 401(k) Plan, adopted as of March 28, 2002(11)*
10.10.1First Amendment to Western Digital Corporation 401(k) Plan, effective as of July 1, 2002(13)*
10.11Western Digital Corporation Executive Retention Plan(2)*
10.12Amended and Restated Long-Term Retention Agreement, between Western Digital Corporation and Matthew E. Massengill, effective as of December 20, 2002(13)*
10.13Amended and Restated Long-Term Retention Agreement, between Western Digital Corporation and Arif Shakeel, effective as of December 20, 2002(13)*
10.14Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, effective December 1, 1999(4)*
10.14.1First Amendment to the Western Digital Corporation 1999 Employee Severance Plan for U.S. Employees, dated April 6, 2001(8)*

62


Exhibit
NumberDescription


10.15Western Digital Corporation Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Plan, effective March 29, 2001(13)*
10.16Letter agreement, dated October 19, 2001, by and between Western Digital Corporation and D. Scott Mercer(10)*
10.17Letter agreement, dated September 10, 2004, by and between Western Digital Technologies, Inc. and Stephen D. Milligan†*
10.18Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors of Western Digital Corporation(12)
10.19Form of Indemnity Agreement for Officers of Western Digital Corporation(12)
10.20Sublease, dated as of September 23, 2003, by and between Advanced Logic Research, Inc. and Western Digital Corporation†
10.21Lease by and between Serrano Jack, L.L.C. and Western Digital Corporation, dated May 30, 2000(6)
10.22Standard Industrial/ Commercial Single-Tenant Lease and Addendum No. 1, dated May 1, 2000, between One Morgan, LLC and Western Digital Corporation(18)
10.23Lease Agreement, dated June 3, 1996, together with First Amendment, between South Bay/ Edenvale Associates and Western Digital Corporation(18)
10.24Single Tenant Industrial Lease Agreement, dated as of August 24, 1992, between Shuwa Investments Corporation and Read-Rite Corporation, together with Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of May 28, 2002(18)
10.25Supply Agreement for the Fabrication and Purchase of Semiconductor Products, dated June 13, 2002, among Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. and Western Digital Technologies, Inc.(14)(17)
10.26Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2003, among Western Digital Technologies, Inc., the other credit parties identified therein, General Electric Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.(20)§ 
10.27Continuing Guaranty, between Western Digital Corporation and General Electric Capital Corporation, dated as of April 7, 2001(8)
10.28Master Equipment Lease Agreement dated June 24, 2004 between CIT Technologies Corporation, doing business as CIT Systems Leasing, and Western Digital Technologies, Inc.†
21Subsidiaries of Western Digital Corporation†
23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm†
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†
32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†


     †New exhibit filed with this Report.

     *Compensation plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     §Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-B, filed April 13, 1987.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 1998.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 1999.

63


(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2000.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2000.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2000.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2001.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2001.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001.

(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002.
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2002.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2002.
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2003.
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2003.
(15) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-107227), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2003.
(16) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2003.
(17) Subject to confidentiality order dated September 5, 2003.
(18) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003.
(19) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2003.
(20) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08703), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2003.

64