UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(MARK ONE)

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

2010

OR

¨
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM            TO            

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-11204

AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

PENNSYLVANIA  25-1424278
PENNSYLVANIA
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  25-1424278
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

MAIN & FRANKLIN STREETS,

P.O. BOX 430, JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA

15907-0430
(Address of principal executive offices)  15907-0430
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (814) 533-5300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title Of Each Class

 

Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered

None 
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value  Share Purchase Rights
Common Stock, $2.50 Par Value
(Title of class)
  Share Purchase Rights
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.o¨  Yes    þ  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.o¨  Yes    þ  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ  Yeso¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ¨  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitionsdefinition of “large“accelerated filer, large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smallersmaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨             Accelerated filer  ¨             Non-accelerated filer  ¨             Smaller reporting company  þ

o

Accelerated filerþNon-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o¨  Yesþ  No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The aggregate market value was$65,115,304 $34,170,547 as of June 30, 2008.

2010.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. There were 21,135,46621,207,670 shares outstanding as of January 31, 2009.

2011.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

     List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (e) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
     Portions of the annual shareholders’ report for the year ended December 31, 2008, are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II.

Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders’ meeting are incorporated by reference in PartParts II and III.

     Exhibit Index is located on page 74.

 


FORM 10-K INDEX

      Page No.
PART I 
Item 1.

PART I

  

Item 1.

Business

   3  

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

12
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

   15  

Item 2.1B.

  Properties

Unresolved Staff Comments

   15  

Item 3.2.

  Legal Proceedings

Properties

   15  

Item 4.3.

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Legal Proceedings

   15  
PART II

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

   15  
Item 5.

PART II

  

Item 5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock andEquity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   16  

Item 6.

  

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

   1817  

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   2018  

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   3539  

Item 8.

  

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   3640  

Item 9.

  

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   7188  

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   7188  

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

   7188  

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

   88

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

   
Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant7188  

Item 11.12.

  Executive Compensation71
Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   7188  

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   7189  

Item 14.

  

Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

   7289  

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

   89

Signatures

   
Item 15.Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K72
Signatures7491  

2


PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

GENERAL

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company organized under the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law. The Company became a holding company upon acquiring all of the outstanding shares of AmeriServ Financial Bank (the Bank) on January 5, 1983. The Company’s other wholly owned subsidiaries include AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company (the Trust Company) formed in October 1992, and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company (AmeriServ Life) formed in October 1987.

The Company’s principal activities consist of owning and operating its three wholly owned subsidiary entities. At December 31, 2008,2010, the Company had, on a consolidated basis, total assets, deposits, and shareholders’ equity of $967$949 million, $695$801 million and $113$107 million, respectively. The Company and its subsidiaries derive substantially all of their income from banking and bank-related services. The Company functions primarily as a coordinating and servicing unit for its subsidiary entities in general management, accounting and taxes, loan review, auditing, investment accounting, marketing and insurance risk management.

As previously stated, the Company is a bank holding company, andthe Company is subject to supervision and regular examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. The Company is also under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for matters relating to offering and sale of its securities. The Company is subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as administered by the SEC. The Company is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the trading symbol “ASRV,” and is subject to the NASDAQ rules of NASDAQ forapplicable to listed companies.

AMERISERV FINANCIAL BANKING SUBSIDIARY

     AmeriServ Financial Bank

AMERISERV FINANCIAL BANK

The Bank is a state bank chartered under the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as amended. Through 18 locations in Allegheny, Cambria, Centre, Somerset, and Westmoreland Counties, Pennsylvania, AmeriServ Financial Bank conducts a general banking business. It is a full-service bankBank offering (i) retail banking services, such as demand, savings and time deposits, money market accounts, secured and unsecured loans, mortgage loans, safe deposit boxes, holiday club accounts, collection services, money orders, and traveler’s checks; (ii) lending, depository and related financial services to commercial, industrial, financial, and governmental customers, such as real estate-mortgage loans, short-short and medium-term loans, revolving credit arrangements, lines of credit, inventory and accounts receivable financing, real estate-construction loans, business savings accounts, certificates of deposit, wire transfers, night depository, and lock box services. The Bank also operates 2122 automated bank teller machines (ATMs) through its 24-Hour Banking Network that is linked with NYCE, a regional ATM network and CIRRUS, a national ATM network. On March 7, 2007, the Bank completed the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA). WCCA is a registered investment advisor and as of December 31, 20082010 had $82$106 million in assets under management.

The Bank’s deposit base is such that loss of one depositor or a related group of depositors would not have a materially adverse effect on its business. In addition, the loan portfolio is also diversified so that one industry or group of related industries does not comprise a material portion of the loan portfolio. The Bank’s business is not seasonal, nor does it have any risks attendant to foreign sources.

The majority of the Bank’s customer base is located within a 100 mile radius of Johnstown, Pennsylvania.

The Bank is subject to supervision and regular examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. Various federal and state laws and regulations govern many aspects of its banking operations. The following is a summary of key data (dollars in thousands) and ratios at December 31, 2008:

     
Headquarters Johnstown, PA 
Chartered  1933 
Total Assets $937,050 
Total Investment Securities  131,893 
Total Loans (net of unearned income)  707,108 
Total Deposits  695,156 
Total Net Income  5,322 
Asset Leverage Ratio  9.30%
Return on Average Assets  0.60 
Return on Average Equity  5.69 
Total Full-time Equivalent Employees  286 

3

2010:


Headquarters

  Johnstown, PA 

Total Assets

  $924,287  

Total Investment Securities

   156,251  

Total Loans and Loans Held for Sale (net of unearned income)

   678,181  

Total Deposits

   801,416  

Total Net Income

   2,496  

Asset Leverage Ratio

   9.13

Return on Average Assets

   0.27  

Return on Average Equity

   2.59  

Total Full-time Equivalent Employees

   279  

RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW:

Risk identification and management are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various types of risk, which includes interest rate, credit, and liquidity risk. The Company controls and monitors these risks with policies, procedures, and various levels of managerial and Board oversight.

Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of net interest income and the market value of financial instruments to the magnitude, direction, and frequency of changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk results from various repricing frequencies and the maturity structure of assets and liabilities. The Company uses its asset liability management policy to control and manage interest rate risk.

Liquidity risk represents the inability to generate cash or otherwise obtain funds at reasonable rates to satisfy commitments to borrowers, as well as the obligations to depositors, debtholders and debtholders.the funding of operating costs. The Company uses its asset liability management policy and contingency funding plan to control and manage liquidity risk.

Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk results from extending credit to customers, purchasing securities, and entering into certain off-balance sheet loan funding commitments. The Company’s primary credit risk occurs in the loan portfolio. The Company uses its credit policy and disciplined approach to evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to control and manage credit risk. The Company’s investment policy and hedging policy strictly limit the amount of credit risk that may be assumed in the investment portfolio and through hedging activities. The following summarizes and describes the Company’s various loan categories and the underwriting standards applied to each:

Commercial

This category includes credit extensions to commercial and industrial borrowers. Business assets, including accounts receivable, inventory and/or equipment, typically secure these credits. In appropriate instances, extensions of credit in this category are subject to collateral advance formulas. Balance sheet strength and profitability are considered when analyzing these credits, with special attention given to historical, current and prospective sources of cash flow, and the ability of the customer to sustain cash flow at acceptable levels. Our policy permits flexibility in determining acceptable debt service coverage ratios, with a minimum level of 1.1 to 1 desired. Personal guarantees are frequently required; however, as the financial strength of the borrower increases, the Company’s ability to obtain personal guarantees decreases. In addition to economic risk, this

category is impacted by the management abilitystrength of the borrowerborrower’s management and industry risk, which are also considered during the underwriting process.

Commercial Loans Secured by Real Estate

This category includes various types of loans, including acquisition and construction of investment property, owner-occupied property and operating property. Maximum term, minimum cash flow coverage, leasing requirements, maximum amortization and maximum loan to value ratios are controlled by the Company’s credit policy and follow industry guidelines and norms, and regulatory limitations. Personal guarantees are normally required during the construction phase on construction credits, and are frequently obtained on mid to smaller commercial real estate loans. In addition to economic risk, this category is subject to geographic and portfolio concentration risk, which are monitored and considered in underwriting.

Real Estate — Mortgage

This category includes mortgages that are secured by residential property. Underwriting of loans within this category is pursuant to Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae underwriting guidelines, with the exception of Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) loans, which exhibit more liberal standards. The major risk in this category is that a significant downward economic trend would increase unemployment and cause payment default. The Company does not and has never engaged in sub-primesubprime residential mortgage lending.

Consumer

This category includes consumer installment loans and revolving credit plans. Underwriting is pursuant to industry norms and guidelines and is achieved through a process, which includes of the Appro Credit Scoring program.guidelines. The major risk in this category is a significant economic downturn.

MAJOR TYPES OF

INVESTMENTS AND THE ASSOCIATED INVESTMENT POLICIES

The investment securities portfolio of the Company and its subsidiaries is managed to provide ample liquidity in a manner that is consistent with proper bank asset/liability management and current banking practices. The objectives of portfolio management include consideration of proper liquidity levels, interest rate and market valuation sensitivity, and profitability. The investment portfolios of

4


the Company and its subsidiaries are proactively managed in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The investment portfolio is primarily made up of AAA rated agency mortgage-backed securities and short maturity agency securities. The purpose of this type of portfolio is to generate adequate cash flow to fund potential loan growth, as the market allows. Management strives to maintain a relatively short duration in the portfolio. All holdings must meet standards documented in the AmeriServ Financial Investment Policy.

DEPOSIT ACTIVITIES

Investment securities classified as held to maturity are carried at amortized cost while investment securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair market value. The following table sets forth the cost basis and fair market value of the Company’s investment portfolio as of the periods indicated:

Investment securities available for sale at:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009   2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

U.S. Agency

  $15,956    $12,342    $10,387  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   145,727     116,088     114,380  

Other securities

             24  
               

Total cost basis of investment securities available for sale

  $161,683    $128,430    $124,791  
               

Total fair value of investment securities available for sale

  $164,811    $131,272    $126,781  
               

Investment securities held to maturity at:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009   2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

U.S. Treasury

  $    $3,009    $3,082  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   6,824     7,602     9,562  

Other securities

   1,000     1,000     3,250  
               

Total cost basis of investment securities held to maturity

  $7,824    $11,611    $15,894  
               

Total fair value of investment securities held to maturity

  $8,267    $11,996    $16,323  
               

DEPOSITS AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS INCLUDING REPAYMENTS AND MATURITIES OF LOANS, SALES AND MATURITIES OF INVESTMENTS AND FHLB ADVANCES

Deposits

The BankCompany has a loyal core deposit base made up of traditional commercial bank products that exhibits little fluctuation, other than Jumbojumbo CDs, which demonstrate some seasonality. The bankCompany also utilizes certain Trust Company specialty deposits related to the ErectERECT Fund as a funding source which serve as an alternative to wholesale borrowings and couldcan exhibit some degree of volatility.

Borrowings

The Bank,following table sets forth the average balance of the Company’s deposits and average rates paid thereon for the past three calendar years:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 

Demand:

          

Non-interest bearing

  $122,963      $114,473      $110,601     

Interest bearing

   58,118     0.30    62,494     0.41    64,683     1.01  

Savings

   77,381     0.51    72,350     0.73    70,255     0.76  

Money market

   186,560     0.87    169,823     1.44    107,843     2.24  

Other time

   358,472     2.44    343,841     2.88    341,185     3.54  
                   

Total deposits

  $803,494     1.61   $762,981     2.02   $694,567     2.69  
                   

Interest expense on deposits consisted of the following:

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009   2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Interest bearing demand

  $176    $256    $653  

Savings

   397     530     535  

Money market

   1,622     2,437     2,417  

Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more

   834     1,186     1,744  

Other time

   7,916     8,700     10,331  
               

Total interest expense

  $10,945    $13,109    $15,680  
               

Additionally, the following table provides more detailed maturity information regarding certificates of deposit issued in denominations of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2010:

MATURING IN:

   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Three months or less

  $12,695  

Over three through six months

   21,695  

Over six through twelve months

   5,321  

Over twelve months

   11,097  
     

Total

  $50,808  
     

Borrowings

The Company, when needed, uses both overnight borrowings and term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh for liquidity management purposes. During the past several years the Company has significantly deleveraged its balance sheet and reduced its level of borrowings through investment portfolio cash flowflow.

The outstanding balances and security sales.

related information for federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   FEDERAL
FUNDS
PURCHASED
  OTHER
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES) 

Balance

  $   $4,550  

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

       9,230  

Average balance during year

   9    3,110  

Average rate paid for the year

   0.51  0.71

Interest rate on year-end balance

       0.62  

   AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   FEDERAL
FUNDS
PURCHASED
  SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES) 

Balance

  $   $25,775  

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

   5,968    54,649  

Average balance during year

   1,358    19,670  

Average rate paid for the year

   0.50  0.67

Interest rate on year-end balance

       0.62  
   AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
   FEDERAL
FUNDS
PURCHASED
  OTHER
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES) 

Balance

  $   $119,920  

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

   5,685    138,855  

Average balance during year

   20    71,617  

Average rate paid for the year

   3.16  1.96

Interest rate on year-end balance

       0.60  

Average amounts outstanding during the year represent daily averages. Average interest rates represent interest expense divided by the related average balances.

These borrowing transactions can range from overnight to one year in maturity. The average maturity was three days at the end of 2010, and two days at the end of 2009 and 2008.

Loans

     During

The loan portfolio of the Company consisted of the following:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009   2008   2007   2006 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

  $78,322    $96,158    $110,197    $118,936    $91,746  

Commercial loans secured by real estate(1)

   370,375     396,787     353,870     285,115     269,781  

Real estate-mortgage(1)

   203,323     207,221     218,928     214,839     209,728  

Consumer

   19,233     19,619     23,804     16,676     18,336  
                         

Loans

   671,253     719,785     706,799     635,566     589,591  

Less: Unearned income

   477     671     691     471     514  
                         

Loans, net of unearned income

  $670,776    $719,114    $706,108    $635,095    $589,077  
                         

(1)For each of the periods presented beginning with December 31, 2010, real estate-construction loans constituted 3.9%, 6.8%, 6.2%, 5.5% and 4.4% of the Company’s total loans, net of unearned income, respectively.

Non-performing Assets

The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 

Non-accrual loans

      

Commercial

  $3,679   $3,375   $1,128   $3,553   $494  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   6,731    11,716    484    225    195  

Real estate-mortgage

   1,879    2,025    1,765    1,460    1,597  
                     

Total

   12,289    17,116    3,377    5,238    2,286  
                     

Past due 90 days or more and still accruing

      

Consumer

                   3  
                     

Total

                   3  
                     

Other real estate owned

      

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   436    871    701          

Real estate-mortgage

   302    350    494    42    3  
                     

Total

   738    1,221    1,195    42    3  
                     

Total restructured loans not in non-accrual (TDR)

   1,337                1,302  
                     

Total non-performing assets including TDR

  $14,364   $18,337   $4,572   $5,280   $3,594  
                     

Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned

   2.12  2.53  0.65  0.83  0.61

The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of (1) fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or (2) carrying cost.

The following table sets forth, for the periods presented herein,indicated, (1) the Company has moderately grown its loan portfoliogross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with no adverse effecttheir original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (2) the amount of interest income actually recorded on liquidity. The Company believes it will be ablesuch loans, and (3) the net reduction in interest income attributable to fund anticipated loan growth generally from investment securities portfolio cash flow and deposit growth.

such loans.

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008   2007  2006 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Interest income due in accordance with original terms

  $1,086   $553   $198    $215   $214  

Interest income recorded

   (458  (75       (24  (55
                      

Net reduction in interest income

  $628   $478   $198    $191   $159  
                      

Secondary Market Activities

The Residential Lending department of the BankCompany continues to originate one-to-four family mortgage loans for bothcustomers, some of which are sold to outside investors in the secondary market and some of which are retained for the AmeriServBank’s portfolio. Mortgages sold on the secondary market are sold to investors on a “flow” basis: Mortgages are priced and delivered on a “best efforts” pricing basis, with servicing released to the investor. Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac guidelines are used in underwriting all mortgages with the exception of CRA loans. The mortgagesMortgages with longer terms such as 20-year, 30-year, FHA, and VA loans are usually sold. The remaining

production of the department includes construction, adjustable rate mortgages, 10-year, 15-year, and bi-weekly mortgages. These loans are usually kept in the AmeriServ portfolioBank’s portfolios, although during periods of low interest rates 15-year loans are typically sold into the secondary market.

AMERISERV FINANCIAL NON-BANKING SUBSIDIARIES

     AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company

AMERISERV TRUST AND FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY

AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company is a trust company organized under Pennsylvania law in October 1992. As one of the larger providers of trust and investment management products and services between Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company is committed to delivering personalized, professional service to its clients. Its staff of approximately 4144 professionals administer assets valued at approximately $1.5$1.4 billion that are not recognized on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2008.2010. The Trust Company has two primary business divisions, traditional trust and union collective investment funds. Traditional trustfocuses on wealth management. Wealth management includes personal trust products and services such as personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts. Also, institutional trust products and services such as 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, and individual retirement accounts are included in this division.segment. The Wealth management business also includes the union collective investment funds, namely the ERECT and BUILD Funds (includes Build Fund of America and Build Fund of Indiana),funds which are designed to investuse union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor. The BUILD fund is in the process of liquidation. At December 31, 2008,2010, AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services had total assets of $3.3$3.5 million and total shareholder’s equity of $3.0$3.1 million. In 2010, the Trust Company contributed earnings to the corporation as its gross revenue amounted to $5.6 million and the net income contribution was $208,000. The Trust Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.

     The diversification of the revenue-generating divisions within the trust company is one of the primary reasons for its successful profitable growth. The specialized union collective funds have attracted several national labor unions as investors as well as many local unions from a number of states. At the end of 2008, assets in these union funds totaled approximately $325 million. In late 2008, both BUILD Funds were in liquidation status. The Company expects this fund to be liquidated over a 3 to 5 year period given current real estate market conditions.

5


AMERISERV LIFE

     The Trust Investment Division focuses on producing better-than-average investment returns by offering an array of individually managed accounts and several asset allocation disciplines utilizing non-proprietary mutual funds. In addition, the Tactical High Yield Bond Fund, the Pathroad Funds and the Premier Equity Discipline are examples of the Investment Division’s ability to respond to the needs and expectations of our clients. The diversified array of investment options, experienced staff and good investment returns facilitate client retention and the development of new clients.
     In 2008, the Trust Company continued to be a solid contributor of earnings to the corporation as its gross revenue amounted to $7.6 million and the net income contribution was $1.3 million.
     AmeriServ Life
AmeriServ Life is a captive insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Arizona. AmeriServ Life engages in underwriting as reinsurer of credit life and disability insurance within the Company’s market area. Operations of AmeriServ Life are conducted in each office of the Company’s banking subsidiary. AmeriServ Life is subject to supervision and regulation by the Arizona Department of Insurance, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department, of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Federal Reserve.Reserve System. At December 31, 2008,2010, AmeriServ Life had total assets of $927,000$705,000 and total stockholders’ equity of $833,000.
$666,000.

MONETARY POLICIES

Commercial banks are affected by policies of various regulatory authorities including the Federal Reserve System. An important function of the Federal Reserve System is to regulate the national supply of bank credit. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the Board of Governors are: open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the federal funds rate and discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements on bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits, and may also affect interest rate charges on loans or interest paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the Board of Governors have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

COMPETITION

     The

Our subsidiaries face strong competition from other commercial banks, savings banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, and several other financial or investment service institutions for business in the communities they serve. Several of these institutions are affiliated with major banking and financial institutions which are substantially larger and have greater financial resources than the subsidiary entities.Bank and the Trust Company. As the financial services industry continues to consolidate, the scope of potential competition affecting the subsidiary entities our subsidiaries

will also increase. For most of the services that the subsidiary entities perform, there is also competition from credit unions and issuers of commercial paper and money market funds. Such institutions, as well as brokerageBrokerage houses, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, and pension trusts are important competitors for various types of financial services. In addition, personal and corporate trust investment counseling services are offered by insurance companies, other firms, and individuals.

MARKET AREA & ECONOMY

Nationally, the economy demonstrated recessionary conditions asis improving gradually, although it may take years to fully emerge from the Commerce Department stated that early indications show Gross Domestic Product fell atnegative effects of the recent economic downturn. The recovery has gathered more momentum, and will get an extra push in 2011 from a 3.8% annual ratefurther injection of fiscal stimulus including the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the next two years, the two percentage point cut in the fourth quarteremployee payroll tax rate for 2011, and a two-year extension of 2008, following a 0.5% dropdepreciation incentives for business investment. Business and consumer confidence are improving. The recent good news is suggesting 2011 GDP growth should come in the third quarter. Economic statistics reveal that the nation has been in a recession for more than a year.near 3.2%. The Fed will continue to be accommodative. Overall, the economy grew atis getting better, but is still not out-of-the-woods. The economy isn’t improving fast enough to make a noticeable reduction in unemployment. Risks, however, still loom, particularly from a weak 1.3%housing market and spending cuts and layoffs from state and local governments.

There are many mixed factors that will affect future economic growth. Positively impacting economic conditions will be 1.) The extension of the Bush tax cuts for another 2-years and extending jobless benefits and cutting payroll taxes in 2008, which was2011; 2.) The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy continuing to be accommodative as short-term rates will be near 0.0%; 3.) The lower value of the slowest expansion sincedollar in the 2001 recession. The investment inworld financial institutions by the United States government together with other programs instituted by the United States Treasury and the Federal Reserve in 2008 has kept the economy from collapsing further,markets should increase exports while the economic stimulus has not yet hadflow of goods from overseas will slow; 4.) Consumers are simultaneously saving more and paying down debt. As a chance to work. This means additional layoffs are likely to occur. However, most recessions generally last no longer than two years. Accordingly, most economists are predicting thatresult, there should be pent-up demand stemming from the current recession will end by the end of 2009. Consumer spending, which accounts for more than two thirdsseverity of the economy, decreased 3.5% in the fourth quarter of 2008 following a 3.8% drop in the third quarter, marking the worse back to back declines since quarterly records began in 1947. The Federal Reserve cut its overnight funds interest rate basically to zero, set up a host of special lending programs and is prepared to begin buying longer-term Treasury bonds, a move that could push down some borrowing rates, in a further effort to shore up the economy. The Fed is increasingly worried about the possibility of deflation,recession which could make it harder forresult in an increase in spending; 5.) Businesses also should have pent-up demand from a need to incorporate the economylatest technology to recover. Tight credit marketsbe competitive and cut costs.

Negatively impacting future economic conditions will be: 1.) Anemic employment gains while the few jobs that have made it more difficult for householdsbeen created have tended to be temporary or part time. 2.) Consumers and businesses will most likely not be willing to acquire debt; 3.) The sharp rise in prices of oil and food commodities should continue to reduce peoples buying power; as will the jump in mortgage rates, which has already significantly slowed re-financing; 4.) Capital constrained banks are not as eager to lend as they should be at this stage of a recovery; 5.) Our trading partners around the world have equally poor economies and offset the positive impact of the lower value of the dollar which will constrain exports; 6.) The actions of Washington on the budget deficit could cause people to assume future tax hikes and spending cuts which could cause consumers and businesses to borrow money. be less willing to spend.

The troubled housing market along with sharp increases toConsumer Price Index rose 0.5% in December, leaving inflation over the past 12 months at 1.5%. Core inflation, which strips out energy and food prices, particularlyshould rise a bit in 2011. The core CPI increased 0.1% in December and just 0.8% over the past 12 months. That’s the slowest pace since this data set began in 1958, and the chief reason the Federal Reserve remains unconcerned about the prospect of higher inflation. Confidence in the middleeconomic expansion remains fragile, but conditions should improve. It is expected that net job growth should be approximately 2.5 million in 2011, following an increase of 2008, negatively impacted other sectors of the economy. Labor markets were also hit hard with1.1 million in 2010. Still, the unemployment rate climbingwill remain high. Now at 9.0%, it’s likely to 7.6% in Januarydecline a bit further over the course of 2009, which is its highest level since 1992. The government has enacted an economic stimulus plan that includes tax breaks, public works spending and expanded health care and unemployment benefits. Also,2011. GDP growth will need to continue to be 3.2% or higher into 2012 to bring the Obama administration is moving forward with a plan to bolster the financial systems which was helped during 2008 with the TARP program. Overall, national economic growth is expected to average -0.5% in 2009.

6

rate significantly lower.


The economy in Cambria and Somerset Counties in December 2008at the end of 2010 produced seasonally adjusted unemployment rates of 7.9%9.5% and 7.8%9.3%, respectively, as compared to national and state rates of 7.2%9.4% and 6.7%, respectively.8.6%. Local markets have been negatively impacted by the recessionary conditions that exist in the national economy, causing the unemployment rate to increase from last year’s average of 5.4%9.3%. The increases in unemployment and the difficulties being experienced by small and medium sized businesses nationally are also being experienced locally. Johnstown, PA, where AmeriServ Financial, IncInc. is headquartered, is a national leader in technology and was designated as the most affordable city in the nation byForbes Magazine.Johnstown’scontinues to have a cost of living that is approximately 30% lower than the national average. The local labor force fluctuated in a very narrow range comparing closely to recent year levels. As of December 31, 2008,2010, total nonfarm jobs in the

Johnstown MSA were 1,700800 below the December 20072009 level, which represents the largest year over year decline since January 2002, with losses coming from both goods-producing andthe service-providing industries. However,industry while the opening of a technology park, and greatergoods producing industries have shown little change in their job levels. In the recent past, work on defense projects is expected to contributehas contributed to economic growth in the future. Local loan demandregion. However, a change in leadership due to the passing of a long time influential Congressman created cause for concern about the continued positive impact from the defense industry, although current activity in this sector remains good, in the commercial sector, but has slowed in the consumer sector.

good.

Economic conditions are stronger in the State College PA market, but have also been negatively impacted by the struggling national economy. The unemployment rate for the State College MSA reached 5.1%5.5% late in December 2008,2010, which is the highest levelrepresents a 0.8% improvement since June 1992, butlast year and remains the lowest of all regions in the Commonwealth. Seasonally adjusted total nonfarm jobs for the MSA droppedincreased by 1,1002,100 since December 2007, representing the largest year over year loss since May 2005.2009. The Company plans to openopened a thirdnew branch office in the State College market during 20092010 as this area presents the Company with a more vibrant economic market and a much different demographic. A large percentage of the population in State College falls into the 18 to 34 year old age group, while potential customers in the Cambria/Somerset markets tend to be over 50 years of age. Overall, opportunities in the State College market are quite different and challenging, providing a promising source of business to profitably grow the Company.

The expansion of Marcellus Shale gas drilling could provide a meaningful economic opportunity for west-central Pennsylvania. The Marcellus Shale, which underlies a vast majority of the state, is the largest unconventional natural gas reserve in the world. There is enormous economic potential for Pennsylvania to take advantage of this reserve as new drilling techniques have unlocked vast resources previously impossible to reach. Technology developed recently at Penn State now allows drilling companies to reach the gas tucked inside a shale bed as much as two miles beneath the surface. The industry will create jobs in drilling and extraction, trucking and water treatment, gas line construction and maintenance, and in producing the materials for all of these needs. The projection for jobs and economic growth generated by the industry is a point of contention between industrialists and environmentalists. The environmental risks and potential regulation on drilling are key factors that could limit the potential growth and positive impact on the state.

EMPLOYEES

The Company employed 379374 people as of December 31, 2008,2010, in full- and part-time positions. Approximately 217199 non-supervisory employees of the BankCompany are represented by the United Steelworkers, of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local Union 2635-06/2635-07. The Bank’s current2635-06. In 2009, the Company successfully negotiated a new four year labor contract with the United Steelworkers Local that will expire on October 15, 2009.2013. The Bankcontract calls for annual wage increases of 1.5% in the first year, 2.0% in each of the second and third years, and 3.0% in the fourth year. The Company has not experienced a work stoppage since 1979. The BankCompany is one of 13 union-represented banks nationwide.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (the “FDICIA”), among other things, identifies five capital categories for insured depository institutions: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. It requires U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements based on these categories. The FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Unless a bank is well capitalized, it is subject to restrictions on its ability to offerutilize brokered deposits and on other aspects of its operations. The FDICIA generally prohibits a bank from paying any dividend or making any capital distribution or paying any management fee to its holding company if the bank would thereafter be undercapitalized. An undercapitalized bank must develop a capital restoration plan, and its parent holding company must guarantee the bank’s compliance with the plan up to the lesser of 5% of the bank’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized and the amount needed to comply with the plan.

As of December 31, 2008,2010, the Company believes that its bankBank subsidiary was well capitalized, based on the prompt corrective action guidelines described above. A bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying the prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.

TEMPORARY LIQUIDITY GUARANTEE PROGRAM

On November 21, 2008, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rule relating to the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). The TLGP was announced by the FDIC on October 14, 2008, preceded by the determination of systemic risk by the Secretary of the Department of Treasury, as an initiative to counter the system-wide crisis in the nation’s financial sector. Under the TLGP the FDIC will (1)guarantee, through the earlier of maturity or June 30, 2012, certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by participating institutions on or after October 14, 2008, and before June 30, 2009 and (2)provide full FDIC deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, Negotiable Order of Withdraw (NOW) accounts paying less than 0.5% interest per annum and Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts held at participating FDIC-insured institutions through December 31, 2009.2010. Coverage under the TLGP was available for the first 30 days without charge. The fee assessment for coverage of senior unsecured debt ranges from 50 basis points to 100 basis points per annum, depending on the initial maturity of the debt. The fee assessment for deposit insurance coverage is 10 basis points per quarter on amounts in covered accounts exceeding $250,000. As of December 31, 2008, theThe Company elected to participate in both guarantee programs.

7

the program that provided full FDIC deposit insurance coverage for all non-interest bearing accounts that became effective on December 31, 2010 and will last until December 31, 2012.


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 contains important requirements for public companies in the area of financial disclosure and corporate governance. In accordance with sectionSection 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley act,Act, written certifications by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required. These certifications attest, among other things, that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. In response to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company adopted a series of procedures to further strengthen its corporate governance practices. The Company also requires signed certifications from managers who are responsible for internal controls throughout the Company as to the integrity of the information they prepare. These procedures supplement the Company’s Code of Conduct Policy and other procedures that were previously in place. In 2005, the Company implemented a program designed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This program included the identification of key processes and accounts, documentation of the design of control effectiveness over process and entity level controls, and testing of the effectiveness of key controls.

PRIVACY PROVISIONS OF GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act), federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about customers to non-affiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to non-affiliated third parties. The privacy provision of the GLB Act affects how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors. The Company believes it is in compliance with the various provisions of the GLB Act.

USA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001

A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA Patriot Act substantially broadened the scope of United States anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence

obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The United States Treasury Department has issued and, in some cases, proposed a number of regulations that apply various requirements of the USA Patriot Act to financial institutions. These regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the Company.

STATISTICAL DISCLOSURES FOR BANK HOLDING COMPANIES

DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). This new law will significantly change the current bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies.

The following Guide 3 information is includedDodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations, and to prepare various studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in this Form 10-K as listed below:

I.Distribution of Assets, Liabilities, and Stockholders’ Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential Information. Information required by this section is presented on pages 21-24, and 30-32.
II.Investment Portfolio Information required by this section is presented on pages 10 and 46-49.
III.Loan Portfolio Information required by this section appears on pages 10-11 and 25-27.
IV.Summary of Loan Loss Experience Information required by this section is presented on pages 26-27.
V.Deposits Information required by this section follows on pages 11-12.
VI.Return on Equity and Assets Information required by this section is presented on page 20.
VII.Short-Term Borrowings Information required by this section is presented on page 12.

8


INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
     Investment securities classified as held to maturity are carried at amortized cost while investment securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair market value. The following table sets forth the cost basisdrafting such rules and fair market valueregulations, and consequently, many of the Company’s investment portfolio asdetails and much of the periods indicated:
     Investment securities available for sale at:
             
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COST BASIS:
            
U.S. Treasury $  $6,006  $6,011 
U.S. Agency  10,387   37,255   57,636 
Mortgage-backed securities  114,380   98,484   113,460 
Other securities  24   25   42 
          
Total cost basis of investment securities available for sale $124,791  $141,770  $177,149 
          
Total fair value of investment securities available for sale $126,781  $140,582  $172,223 
          
     Investment securities held to maturity at:
             
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COST BASIS:
            
U.S. Treasury $3,082  $3,153  $3,220 
U.S. Agency     3,473   3,471 
Mortgage-backed securities  9,562   6,157   7,216 
Other securities  3,250   5,750   6,750 
          
Total cost basis of investment securities held to maturity $15,894  $18,533  $20,657 
          
Total fair value of investment securities held to maturity $16,323  $18,378  $20,460 
          
LOAN PORTFOLIO
     The loan portfolioimpact of the Company consistedDodd-Frank Act may not be known for months or years.

Certain provisions of the following:

                     
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Commercial $110,197  $118,936  $91,746  $80,629  $72,011 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  353,870   285,115   269,781   249,204   225,661 
Real estate-mortgage(1)  218,928   214,839   209,728   201,111   201,406 
Consumer  23,804   16,676   18,336   20,391   23,285 
                
Loans  706,799   635,566   589,591   551,335   522,363 
Less: Unearned income  691   471   514   831   1,634 
                
Loans, net of unearned income $706,108  $635,095  $589,077  $550,504  $520,729 
                
(1)For each of the periods presented beginning with December 31, 2008, real estate-construction loans constituted 6.2%, 5.5%, 4.4%, 5.5% and 6.3% of the Company’s total loans, net of unearned income, respectively.

9


NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
     The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets:
                     
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Non-accrual loans
                    
Commercial $1,128  $3,553  $494  $2,315  $802 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  484   225   195   318   606 
Real estate-mortgage  1,313   875   1,050   1,070   2,049 
Consumer  452   585   547   446   412 
                
Total  3,377   5,238   2,286   4,149   3,869 
                
                     
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing
                    
Consumer        3   31    
                
Total        3   31    
                
                     
Other real estate owned
                    
Commercial loans secured by real estate  701             
Real estate-mortgage  494   42   3   130   15 
Consumer           5   10 
                
Total  1,195   42   3   135   25 
                
                     
Total non-performing assets
 $4,572  $5,280  $2,292  $4,315  $3,894 
                
Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.65%  0.83%  0.39%  0.78%  0.75%
Total restructured loans $1,360  $1,217  $1,302  $258  $5,685 
     The Company is unaware of any additional loans whichDodd-Frank Act are requiredexpected to either be charged-off or added tohave a near term impact on the non-performing asset totals disclosed above. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1) fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2) carrying cost.
     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for partCompany. For example, effective July 21, 2011, a provision of the period, (ii)Dodd-Frank Act eliminates the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses to have interest bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant change to existing law could have an adverse impact on the Company’s interest expense.

The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans,deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributablecredit unions to such loans.

                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest income due in accordance with original terms $198  $215  $214  $213  $469 
Interest income recorded     (24)  (55)  (12)  (19)
                
Net reduction in interest income $198  $191  $159  $201  $450 
                
DEPOSITS
     The following table sets forth the average balance$250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2013.

Bank and thrift holding companies with assets of the Company’s deposits and average rates paid thereon for the past three calendar years:

                         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES)     
Demand:                        
Non-interest bearing $110,601   % $105,306   % $104,266   %
Interest bearing  64,683   1.01   67,132   1.76   57,817   1.05 
Savings  70,255   0.76   71,922   0.76   81,964   0.78 
Money market  107,843   2.24   158,947   3.80   172,029   3.34 
Other time  341,185   3.54   346,134   4.34   319,220   3.83 
                      
Total deposits $694,567   2.69  $749,441   3.54  $735,296   3.05 
                      

10


     Interest expense on deposits consisted of the following:
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest bearing demand $653  $1,184  $606 
Savings  535   549   644 
Money market  2,417   6,040   5,743 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  1,744   1,774   1,894 
Other time  10,331   13,264   10,345 
          
Total interest expense $15,680  $22,811  $19,232 
          
     Additionally, the following table provides more detailed maturity information regarding certificates of deposit issued in denominations of $100,000 or moreless than $15 billion as of December 31, 2008:
     MATURING IN:
     
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Three months or less $11,813 
Over three through six months  13,382 
Over six through twelve months  3,565 
Over twelve months  7,406 
    
Total $36,166 
    
FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND OTHER SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
2009, such as the Company, will be permitted to include trust preferred securities that were issued before May 19, 2010, as Tier 1 capital; however, trust preferred securities issued by a bank or thrift holding company (other than those with assets of less than $500 million) after May 19, 2010, will no longer count as Tier 1 capital. Trust preferred securities still will be entitled to be treated as Tier 2 capital.

The outstanding balancesDodd-Frank Act will require publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and related information for federal funds purchasedso-called “golden parachute” payments, and other short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
  FEDERAL OTHER
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $119,920 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  5,685   138,855 
Average balance during year  20   71,617 
Average rate paid for the year  3.16%  1.96%
Interest rate on year end balance     0.60 
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007
  FEDERAL OTHER
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $72,210 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  3,430   74,095 
Average balance during year  99   19,745 
Average rate paid for the year  5.18%  4.89%
Interest rate on year end balance     3.88 
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2006
  FEDERAL OTHER
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $49,091 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end     61,728 
Average balance during year  43   32,778 
Average rate paid for the year  5.69%  5.10%
Interest rate on year end balance     5.48 
     Average amounts outstanding during the year represent daily averages. Average interest rates represent interest expense dividedallow greater access by the related average balances.
     These borrowing transactions can range from overnight to one year in maturity. The average maturity was two days at the end of 2008 and 2007 and three days at the end of 2006.

11


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
     Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in our common stock. The risks described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair our business. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In assessing these risks, you should also refershareholders to the other information contained or incorporatedcompany’s proxy material by reference in this Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Other corporate information is available at www.AmeriServFinancial.com
Failureauthorizing the SEC to successfully execute our turnaround strategy would adversely affect future earnings.
     At the end of 2003, we adopted a turnaround strategy that consisted of three distinct elements. These were:
In 2003, stabilizing AmeriServ and taking immediate steps to eliminate or minimize those risk elements that posed a threat to our survival;
In 2004 and 2005, executing steps to eliminate the key structural impediments to sustainable, improved earnings; and
Articulating and executing, over the long-term, a strategy centered on community banking and continued expansion of our successful trust business that is intended to produce consistent future earnings.
     We believe we accomplished the first two elements of the turnaround strategy. With our earnings growth in 2007 and 2008, we achieved meaningful progress towards the third element of the turnaround. However, this final element of the turnaround requires sustained execution of our business plan to drive our financial performance closer to peer bank levels. If we are unable to achieve the last element of the turnaround strategy, our financial condition and results of operations will not dramatically improve and may deteriorate.
We are subject to lending risks.
     There are risks inherent in making all loans. These risks include interest rate changes over the time period in which loans may be repaid and changes in the national economy or the economy of our regional market that affect the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans.
     At December 31, 2008, 65.6% of our net loan portfolio consisted of commercial and commercial mortgage loans, including construction loans. Commercial loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans also are typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because our loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and commercial mortgage loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans would cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in our provision for loan losses and an increase in loan charge-offs.
Our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to absorb actual losses or if we are required to increase our allowance.
     Despite our underwriting criteria, we may experience loan delinquencies and losses for reasons beyond our control, such as general economic conditions. At December 31, 2008, we had non-performing assets equal to 0.65% of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income and other real estate owned. In order to absorb losses associated with non-performing assets, we maintain an allowance for loan losses based on, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation of economic conditions, and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Determination of the allowance inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. We may be required to increase our allowance for loan losses for any of several reasons. State and federal regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio as part of a regulatory examination, may request that we increase our allowance for loan losses. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in our allowance. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed our allowance for loan losses, we will need additional increases in our allowance for loan losses. Any increases in our allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in our net income and, possibly, our capital, and may materially affect our results of operations in the period in which the allowance is increased.
We have unionized employees, which increases our costs and may deter any acquisition proposal.
     The Bank is party to a collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America, which represents approximately 57% of our employees. In 2007, our current contract was extended until October 15, 2009. Terms of the contract extension remain the same as the prior contract with the exception of a 2.0% wage increase in the first year, and a 2.5% increase in the second year. As

12


a result of provisions in the contract, generally known as workpromulgate rules we sometimes cannot take steps that would reduce our operating costs. Furthermore,allow stockholders to our knowledge, we are onenominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of only 13 unionized banking institutions inwhether the United States. company is publicly traded.

The banking industry is a consolidating industry in which acquisitions are frequent. However, some banking institutions may be reluctant to buy a unionized bank because of a perception that operating costs may be higher or that it could result in unionization of its work force. Additionally, there is the risk of a work stoppage ifDodd-Frank Act creates a new collective bargaining agreement cannot be negotiated beforeConsumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the end of the current agreement. Therefore, our stock price may be adversely affected because investors may conclude that there is a reduced likelihood that we will be acquiredauthority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or could be an acquiror.

Changesabusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than

$10 billion in interest rates could reduce our income, cash flowsassets. Banks and asset values.

     Our income, cash flows and the value of our assets depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates we earn on interest-earningsavings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets such as loansthe Company will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by their primary bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and investment securities, as well asfederal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the interest rates we pay on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitiveability to many factors which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular,enforce federal consumer protection laws.

It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence not only the interest we receive on our loans and investment securitiesDodd-Frank Act and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but it also will affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits and the value of our investment portfolio. If the rate of interest we pay on our deposits and other borrowings increases more than the rate of interest we earn on our loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore our earnings, could be adversely affected. Our earnings also could be adversely affected if the rates on our loans and other investments fall more quickly than those on our deposits and other borrowings.

Because our operations are concentrated in Cambria and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania, we are subject to economic conditions in this area, which typically lag behind economic activity in other areas.
     Some of our loans and the majority of our deposit activities are based in Cambria and Somerset Counties, located in southwestern Pennsylvania. As a result, our financial performance will depend largely upon economic conditions in this area. Economic activity in this geographic market generally lags behind the economic activity in Pennsylvania and the nation. Similarly, unemployment in this market area is typically higher than the unemployment rate in Pennsylvania and the nation, although this difference has declined in recent years as our local economy has become more diversified. Adverse local economic conditions could cause us to experience a reduction in deposits, an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, all of which could adversely affect our profitability.
A portion of our trust business is dependent on a union client base.
     In an effort to capitalize on the Bank’s union affiliation, our Trust Company operates the ERECT Funds and the BUILD Funds that seek to attract investment from union pension funds. These funds then use the investments to make loans and/or equity investments on construction projects that use union labor.At December 31, 2008, approximately $325 million was invested by unions in the ERECT and BUILD Funds. This represents approximately 21.2% of the total assets administered by the Trust Company. Therefore, the Trust Company is dependent on a discrete union client base for a portion of its assets under management and its resulting revenue and net income. In late 2008 both BUILD Funds were in liquidation status. The Company expects this fundyet to be liquidated overwritten implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks. However, it is expected that at a 3 to 5 year period given the current real estate market conditions.
The Company may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
     Financial service institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. The Company has exposure to many different industriesminimum they will increase our operating and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose the Company to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, the Company’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Company cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to the Company. Reduced wholesale funding capacity or higher borrowingcompliance costs due to capital constraints at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, would reduce the Company’s liquidity and negatively impact earnings and net interest margin. Any such losses could have a material adverse affect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success will depend on our ability to compete effectively in a highly competitive market and geographic area.
     We face substantial competition in all phases of our operations from a variety of different competitors, including commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies, factoring companies, insurance companies and money market mutual funds. There is very strong competition among financial services providers in our

13


principal service area. Due to their size, many competitors can achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can.
     We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including:
Our ability to build upon existing customer relationships and market position;
Competitors’ interest rates and service fees;
Our ability to attract and retain a qualified workforce;
The scope of our products and services;
The relevance of our products and services to customer needs and demands and the rate at which we and our competitors introduce them;
Satisfaction of our customers with our customer service; and
Industry and general economic trends.
     If we experience difficulty in any of these areas, our competitive position could be materially adversely affected, which will affect our growth and profitability.
     Some of the financial services organizations with which we compete are not subject to the same degree of regulation as is imposed on federally insured financial institutions. As a result, those non-bank competitors may be able to access funding and provide various services more easily or at less cost than we can, adversely affecting our ability to compete effectively.
We may be adversely affected by government regulation.
     We are subject to extensive federal and state banking regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are intended primarily to protect our depositors’ funds and the federal deposit insurance funds, not shareholders. Regulatory requirements affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in the imposition of limitations on our operations that would adversely impact our operations and could if capital levels drop significantly, result in our being required to cease operations. Changes in governing law, regulations or regulatory practices could impose additional costs on us or adversely affect our ability to obtain deposits or make loans and, as a consequence, our revenues and profitability.
Environmental liability associated with lending activities could result in losses.
     In the course of our business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing our loans. If hazardous substances were discovered on any of these properties, we may be liable to governmental entities or third parties for the costs of remediation of the hazard, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Many environmental laws can impose liability regardless of whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the contamination. In addition, if we arrange for the disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at another site, we may be liable for the costs of cleaning up and removing those substances from the site, even if we neither own nor operate the disposal site. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially limit use of properties we acquire through foreclosure, reduce their value or limit our ability to sell them in the event of a default on the loans they secure. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK
The Company’s stock price can be volatile.
     Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. The Company’s stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
interest expense.

ITEM 1A.Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations;
Operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company;
News reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry;
Perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Company and/or its competitors;
New technology used, or services offered, by competitors;
Changes in government regulations; and
Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.RISK FACTORS

14

Not applicable.


ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

     General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause the Company’s stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.
The trading volume in the Company’s common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.
     Although the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market System (NASDAQ), the trading volume in its common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the Company’s common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which the Company has no control. Given the lower trading volume of the Company’s common stock, significant sales of the Company’s common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause the Company’s stock price to fall.
An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.
     Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, commonly referred to as the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
The Company has no unresolved staff comments from the SEC for the reporting periodperiods presented.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

The principal offices of the Company and the Bank occupy the five-story AmeriServ Financial building at the corner of Main and Franklin Streets in Johnstown plus twelve floors of the building adjacent thereto. The Company occupies the main office and its subsidiary entities have 1314 other locations which are owned. Eight additional locations are leased with terms expiring from September 30, 2009January 1, 2010 to MarchAugust 31, 2018.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
2030.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is subject to a number of asserted and unasserted potential legal claims encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of both management and legal counsel, there is no present basis to conclude that the resolution of these claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
     No matter was submitted by the Company to its shareholders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

15


ITEM 4.(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

PART II
ITEM 5.

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

COMMON STOCK

As of January 31, 2009,2011, the Company had 4,2014,069 shareholders of its common stock. AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market System under the symbol ASRV.“ASRV.” The following table sets forth the actual high and low closing prices and the cash dividends declared per share for the periods indicated:

             
          CASH
  PRICES DIVIDENDS
  HIGH LOW DECLARED
Year ended December 31, 2008:
            
First Quarter
 $3.30  $2.21  $0.00 
Second Quarter
  3.08   2.60   0.00 
Third Quarter
  2.98   2.37   0.00 
Fourth Quarter
  2.85   1.59   0.025 
Year ended December 31, 2007            
First Quarter $4.85  $4.52  $0.00 
Second Quarter  4.77   4.25   0.00 
Third Quarter  4.26   3.33   0.00 
Fourth Quarter  3.36   2.77   0.00 
     As a result

   PRICES   CASH
DIVIDENDS
DECLARED
 
     
   HIGH   LOW   

Year ended December 31, 2010:

      

First Quarter

  $2.13    $1.42    $0.00  

Second Quarter

   2.49     1.60     0.00  

Third Quarter

   1.89     1.40     0.00  

Fourth Quarter

   1.75     1.51     0.00  

Year ended December 31, 2009

      

First Quarter

  $1.99    $1.43    $0.00  

Second Quarter

   1.88     1.56     0.00  

Third Quarter

   2.09     1.54     0.00  

Fourth Quarter

   1.97     1.46     0.00  

Information regarding restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay dividends is included in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Capital Resources.” Information required by this section is presented in the “Equity Compensation Plan Information Table” section of the decision by the Company to accept a preferred stock investment under the U.S. Treasury’s CPP for a period of three years the Company is no longer permitted to repurchase stock or declare and pay common dividends without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.

     The following table summarizes share repurchase activityProxy Statement for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
             
          Number Of
          Shares That May
  Total Number Average Price Yet Be
  Of Shares Paid Per Share Purchased
October  86,400  $2.53   656,800 
November  411,600  $2.30   245,200 
December  245,200  $2.32    
     All shares are repurchased under BoardAnnual Meeting of Directors authorization. In December 2007, the Board authorized a new program to repurchase 1.1 million shares.

16Shareholders.


ITEM 6.SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

PERFORMANCE GRAPH
     The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “Soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Returns
Among AmeriServ Financial, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market,
and NASDAQ Bank Stocks
     
     The following table compares total shareholder returns for the Company over the past five years to the NASDAQ Stock Market and the NASDAQ Bank Stocks assuming a $100 investment made on December 31, 2003. Each of the three measures of cumulative return assumes reinvestment of dividends. The stock performance shown on the graph above is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
                                 
 
    12/31/03  12/31/04  12/31/05  12/31/06  12/31/07  12/31/08 
 AmeriServ Financial, Inc.  $100.00   $103.40   $87.60   $98.60   $55.40   $40.20  
 NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)   100.00    109.20    111.50    123.00    136.20    81.70  
 NASDAQ Bank Stocks   100.00    113.60    111.50    126.80    101.60    79.70  
 

17


ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
                     
  AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
SUMMARY OF INCOME STATEMENT DATA:                    
Total interest income $47,819  $49,379  $46,565  $45,865  $50,104 
Total interest expense  18,702   25,156   22,087   21,753   26,638 
                
Net interest income  29,117   24,223   24,478   24,112   23,466 
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)  (175)  1,758 
                
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  26,192   23,923   24,603   24,287   21,708 
Total non-interest income  16,424   14,707   12,841   10,209   14,012 
Total non-interest expense  35,637   34,672   34,692   49,420   50,091 
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  6,979   3,958   2,752   (14,924)  (14,371)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  1,470   924   420   (5,902)  (5,845)
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations  5,509   3,034   2,332   (9,022)  (8,526)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes *           (119)  (1,193)
                
Net income (loss) $5,509  $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141) $(9,719)
                
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:                    
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.25  $0.14  $0.11  $(0.44) $(0.58)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.25   0.14   0.11   (0.44)  (0.58)
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS*:                    
Basic loss per share $  $  $  $(0.01) $(0.08)
Diluted loss per share           (0.01)  (0.08)
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:                    
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.25  $0.14  $0.11  $(0.45) $(0.66)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.25   0.14   0.11   (0.45)  (0.66)
Cash dividends declared  0.025   0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00 
Book value at period end  4.39   4.07   3.82   3.82   4.32 
BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA:                    
Total assets $966,929  $904,878  $895,992  $880,176  $1,009,232 
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  707,108   636,155   589,435   550,602   521,416 
Allowance for loan losses  8,910   7,252   8,092   9,143   9,893 
Investment securities available for sale  126,781   140,582   172,223   201,569   373,584 
Investment securities held to maturity  15,894   18,533   20,657   30,355   27,435 
Deposits  694,956   710,439   741,755   712,665   644,391 
Total borrowings  133,778   82,115   63,122   77,256   269,169 
Stockholders’ equity  113,252   90,294   84,684   84,474   85,219 
Full-time equivalent employees  353   351   369   378   406 

   AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
   (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 

SUMMARY OF INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

      

Total interest income

  $44,831   $47,455   $47,819   $49,379   $46,565  

Total interest expense

   12,489    15,021    18,702    25,156    22,087  
                     

Net interest income

   32,342    32,434    29,117    24,223    24,478  

Provision for loan losses

   5,250    15,150    2,925    300    (125
                     

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

   27,092    17,284    26,192    23,923    24,603  

Total non-interest income

   13,967    13,928    16,424    14,707    12,841  

Total non-interest expense

   39,697    39,157    35,637    34,672    34,692  
                     

Income (loss) before income taxes

   1,362    (7,945  6,979    3,958    2,752  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   80    (3,050  1,470    924    420  
                     

Net income (loss)

  $1,282   $(4,895 $5,509   $3,034   $2,332  
                     

PER COMMON SHARE DATA:

      

Basic earnings (loss) per share

  $0.01   $(0.29 $0.25   $0.14   $0.11  

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

   0.01    (0.29  0.25    0.14    0.11  

Cash dividends declared

   0.00    0.00    0.025    0.00    0.00  

Book value at period end

   4.07    4.09    4.39    4.07    3.82  

BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA:

      

Total assets

  $948,974   $970,026   $966,929   $904,878   $895,992  

Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income

   678,181    722,904    707,108    636,155    589,435  

Allowance for loan losses

   19,765    19,685    8,910    7,252    8,092  

Investment securities available for sale

   164,811    131,272    126,781    140,582    172,223  

Investment securities held to maturity

   7,824    11,611    15,894    18,533    20,657  

Deposits

   801,216    786,011    694,956    710,439    741,755  

Total borrowings

   27,385    64,664    146,863    95,200    63,122  

Stockholders’ equity

   107,058    107,254    113,252    90,294    84,684  

Full-time equivalent employees

   348    345    353    351    369  

SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS:

      

Return on average total equity

   1.19  (4.33)%   5.93  3.51  2.74

Return on average assets

   0.13    (0.51  0.62    0.34    0.27  

Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, as a percent of deposits, at period end

   84.64    91.97    101.75    89.54    79.46  

Ratio of average total equity to average assets

   11.25    11.72    10.40    9.79    9.73  

Common stock cash dividends as a percent of net income available to common shareholders

           9.92          

Interest rate spread

   3.51    3.37    3.21    2.54    2.67  

Net interest margin

   3.79    3.72    3.64    3.06    3.12  

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, at period end

   2.91    2.72    1.26    1.14    1.37  

Non-performing assets as a percentage of loans, loans held for sale and other real estate owned, at period end

   2.12    2.53    0.65    0.83    0.39  

Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and loans held for sale

   0.74    0.60    0.20    0.19    0.16  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends:(1)

      

Excluding interest on deposits

   1.49  (1.12)X   3.17  2.60  1.93

Including interest on deposits

   1.10    0.53    1.37    1.16    1.12  

Cumulative one year interest rate sensitivity gap ratio, at period end

   1.13    1.08    1.10    0.90    0.85  

*The Company sold its remaining mortgage servicing rights of Standard Mortgage Corporation, its former mortgage servicing subsidiary, in December 2004 and incurred discontinued operations activity of this non-core business in 2005.

18


                     
  AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS:                    
Return on average total equity  5.93%  3.51%  2.74%  (10.77)%  (11.44)%
Return on average assets  0.62   0.34   0.27   (0.95)  (0.76)
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, as a percent of deposits, at period end  101.75   89.54   79.46   77.26   80.92 
Ratio of average total equity to average assets  10.40   9.79   9.73   8.80   6.67 
Common stock cash dividends as a percent of net income applicable to common stock  9.92             
Interest rate spread  3.21   2.54   2.67   2.39   2.01 
Net interest margin  3.64   3.06   3.12   2.76   2.28 
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, at period end  1.26   1.14   1.37   1.66   1.90 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of loans, loans held for sale and other real estate owned, at period end  0.65   0.83   0.39   0.78   0.75 
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and loans held for sale  0.20   0.19   0.16   0.11   0.68 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends:(1)                    
Excluding interest on deposits  3.17X  2.60X  1.93X  (1.35)X  0.12X
Including interest on deposits  1.37   1.16   1.12   0.05   0.46 
Cumulative one year interest rate sensitivity gap ratio, at period end  1.10   0.90   0.85   0.89   0.78 
(1)The ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends is computed by dividing the sum of income before taxes, fixed charges, and preferred dividends by the sum of fixed charges and preferred dividends. Fixed charges represent interest expense and are shown as both excluding and including interest on deposits.

19


ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (AmeriServ) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. including the related notes thereto, included elsewhere herein.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, AND 2006

2008

2010 SUMMARY OVERVIEW:

     The net income of

On January 25, 2011, AmeriServ inFinancial, Inc. (ASRV) released its financial results for the fourth quarter of 2008 exceeded2010 and for the full year of 2010. Net income for the fourth quarter was reported at $1,114,000 or $0.04 per share. This represents the fifth consecutive quarter of improved financial performance for ASRV and is an 83% increase over the third quarter of 2010 and a $2,793,000 increase in absolute dollars over the fourth quarter of 2009. These fourth quarter improved results enabled AmeriServ to record net income for the full year of 2010 of $1,282,000 or $0.01 per share. This performance produced a net income improvement of $6,177,000 over 2009, as each of the last three quarters of 2010 surpassed the same periodquarters of 20072009 by 75%. a wide margin.

This resulted fromimprovement cannot be attributed to a $71strong recovery of the national or regional economy as regional loan demand remains weak and regional unemployment remained well above 9% during the entire year. Rather, we believe that the improvement at ASRV is the result of Board and management actions recognizing that in a troubled economy it is important to introduce special monitoring activities to protect the franchise. The Asset Quality Task Force continues to meet weekly so as to recognize any weakness in specific loans. This vigilance provides an opportunity to both assist the borrower where possible and also to take the necessary steps to keep ASRV strong. The Asset Liability Management Committee also convenes regularly to measure the strength of capital and the necessary depth of liquidity. But perhaps most important of all is that those ASRV community bankers, who meet with customers regularly, continue to provide competitive banking products as well as helpful counsel. We understand that it is our responsibility to always provide our customers with a strong company, but side-by-side with friendly personal service. This has been the formula that has produced our improved performance in 2010.

A few years ago we promised that ASRV was going to return to its old fashioned community banking roots. That promise lies behind many of our activities in 2010. Specifically,

During 2010 ASRV provided $96 million increasefor residential mortgages to our neighbors in loans outstandingthis region. It was a record year for the ASRV mortgage bankers, and we and the local families they have helped salute their efforts.

During 2010 ASRV opened a 76 basis point increasenew branch bank on busy North Atherton Street in State College, Pennsylvania. This full service bank is already welcoming many new customers who have been attracted to a well located bank eager to serve them.

During 2010 our Commercial Banking Division was completely reorganized so as to provide the net interest margin.small and medium sized businesses in our region with quick access to responsive and professional relationship managers. We want every business in our market to know that we want their business and that our professionals will go the extra mile to get it, and keep it.

While working to push this positive agenda ahead, ASRV has also been rebuilding internally. During 2010 ASRV conducted nationwide executive searches to find new leadership for AmeriServ’s Trust Company and the Commercial Banking Division of AmeriServ Financial Bank. We were pleased with the quality of

the new executives we hired. Each of these executives has a strong record of achievement in previous assignments and is already focusing on a productive and profitable future for both of these key activities.

It is especially important that we call to your attention our continuing plan to provide resources to AmeriServ’s Trust Company in support of its new strategic direction. The conservative balance sheetsize and scope of this wholly owned subsidiary provides the corporation with more customer service wealth management opportunities than many of our peers enjoy.

We do want you to know that AmeriServwe are quite aware of the economic challenges faced by our region and by America itself. It is this realistic view of conditions that has maintained since 2005 wascaused us to emphasize the need to make ASRV strong and safe. The capital levels at ASRV have been, and continue to be, well positioned forabove any requirement of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking or the Federal Reserve programBank of Philadelphia. Additionally, ASRV has been careful to lower interest rates. Atbuild and maintain a high level of liquidity during these volatile times when even the same time, AmeriServ had ample liquidity to respond to a number of attractive lending opportunities which increased net loans. The result was that the fourth quarter proved to be the strongest quarter recorded in 2008, with no unusual events.

     The impactsafety of the fourth quarter on the full year was significant. Net income in 2008 totaled $5.5 million and surpassed thatdebt instruments of 2007 by 82% as earnings per share increased from $0.14 per share in 2007 to $0.25 per share in 2008. Return on assets for the full year was 0.62% or 28 basis points above the full year 2007. These performance improvements were in spite of the decline in the equity markets which reduced the late year revenue streams of both the Trust Company and West Chester Capital Advisors
     However, all this is not to say that 2008 wassovereign nations has been called into question. We have also consistently maintained a year without challenges. The stumbles in the economy caused AmeriServ to increase itsstrong loan loss provision by $2.6 million over 2007reserve to improve its coverageprovide a buffer against the recession driven problems which have beset many struggling individuals and commercial enterprises. As of December 31, 2010, our allowance for loan losses was 138% of our total of non-performing assets irrespective of any collateral pledged to 195% (as compared with 137% at December 31, 2007). After two yearssecure such loans.

It is when we consider the nature of reducing expenses, in 2008 expenses increased by 2.8%. This increase was not in salaries and benefits, but chiefly in external professional expenses to gain the best guidance as we manage through these turbulent times. Overall, we believe the fourth quarter and full year results were encouraging, especially considering the well documented troubles that persist in banking and which now have spread into the national and global economy.

     During 2007 and 2008, and now extending into 2009, we have become sadly familiar with a new setchallenges of phrases. We speak daily of sub-prime mortgages, of a credit crunch, of financial bailouts and the like. We hear leading economists and governmental experts tell us that their next recommended program will finally be the answer to the nation’s dilemma. But we have also noticed — in spite of these frequently encouraging pronouncements — the economy has continued its decline. Employment reductions have become commonplace, bankruptcy filingsthat we are disturbingly frequentdetermined to not relax our vigilance. We believe that the steady improvement in our financial performance over the last year is proof positive that vigilance is important but must also be supported by strong capital and none ofstrong liquidity. We are also taking the hastily designed economic solutions have arrested the decline.
     Here at AmeriServ we observe these developments with an attitude of careful concern. As a company operating in the heart of the Rust Belt, we learned it is foolhardytime to swim against the tide. During the period 2002 through 2005, we learned just how difficult it is to overcome mounting real world difficulties. Our positive performance during the troubles of 2008 tells us that AmeriServ is once again a healthy company.
     Now the challenge is to keep it healthy while the banking industry and the global economy continue to experience what can only be termed as stunning losses. It was this commitment to protect the reinvented AmeriServ that caused the Board of Directors to elect to participate in the Treasury Department Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The infusion of $21 million of new capital on December 19, 2008, serves as a sort of “rainy day fund” to protect our shareholders should this recession deepen into a depression. However, it also provides a solid foundation so AmeriServ can continue to make new job-creating business loans in the community, thus enabling local consumers to pay their bills and feed their families.
     In better times this additional capital can also position AmeriServ to have the talent and the energy to be immediately proactive oncea force in this region as the long promised economic recovery begins.economy improves. Our motto has become strength for today with a deep reservoir of energy for tomorrow as we work to assist the communities we serve.

PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW … The Board’s decision reflects our view that this additional capital further strengthens AmeriServ today — and for the future. Unfortunately, participation in the CPP forced us to suspend our recently announced common stock dividend. We requested an exception from this restriction in a detailed submission to the authorities, but our request was denied. We will continue to monitor the CPP program and file a new exception request as soon as conditions suggest an approval is possible. But for the present, as stated, we will strive to manage this 23% increase in capital to build an even stronger AmeriServ that is a sound, rewarding, long term investment.

     PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW. . .The following table summarizes some of the Company’s key profitability performance indicators for each of the past three years.

20


   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT

PER SHARE DATA AND RATIOS)

 

Net income (loss)

  $1,282   $(4,895 $5,509  

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

   0.01    (0.29  0.25  

Return on average assets

   0.13  (0.51)%   0.62

Return on average equity

   1.19    (4.33  5.93  

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
  PER SHARE DATA AND RATIOS)
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
Diluted earnings per share  0.25   0.14   0.11 
Return on average assets  0.62%  0.34%  0.27%
Return on average equity  5.93   3.51   2.74 
The Company reported net income of $1.3 million or $0.01 per diluted common share for 2010. This represents an increase of $6.2 million from the 2009 net loss of $4.9 million or $0.29 per diluted common share. Improvements in asset quality were a key factor causing our increased earnings in 2010. Proactive monitoring of our loan portfolio and problem credits allowed us to carefully adjust downward the provision for loan losses in each quarter of 2010 while still maintaining good loan loss reserve coverage ratios. Also, there was little change in total revenue in 2010 as both net interest income and non-interest income were comparable with the prior year. Non-interest expenses increased moderately in 2010 as they grew by 1.4%. Diluted earnings per share were again impacted by the preferred dividend requirement on the TARP-CPP preferred stock and accretion of discount on preferred stock, which amounted to $1.3 million and reduced the amount of net income available to common shareholders.

The Company reported a net loss of $4.9 million or $0.29 loss per diluted common share for 2009. This represented a decrease of $10.4 million from the 2008 net income of $5.5 million or $0.25 per diluted share for 2008. This represents an increase of $2.5 million or 82% over 2007 net income of $3.0 million or $0.14 per dilutedcommon share. The Company’s return on assets improved to 0.62% in 2008 compared to 0.34% in 2007. Our conservative balance sheet positioning allowed AmeriServ Financial to report improved financial performance during a historic period of turmoil and crisis within the financial markets. The Company has no direct exposure to sub-prime mortgages, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac preferred stock, pooled trust preferred securities, or credit exposure to any of the large financial firms that have recently failed or been taken over. The growth in earnings in 2008 was driven by increased net interest income and higher non-interest revenue, which more than offset anAn increased provision for loan losses, reduced non-interest income, and higher non-interest expenses.

     The Company reported net income of $3.0 million or $0.14 per diluted share for 2007. This represented an increase of $702,000 or 30.1% when compared to net income of $2.3 million or $0.11 per diluted share for 2006. The increaseexpenses were the main factors causing the decrease in net income in 2007 was due to increased non-interest revenue and lower non-interest expense, which2009. These negative items more than offset the negative impact of reducedgood

growth in net interest income that resulted from solid loan and deposit growth within our retail Bank in 2009 and effective balance sheet management in a higher provision for loan losses and increased income tax expense. The increase in non-interest revenue was attributable to the West Chester Capital Advisors acquisition, which was completed in March 2007. Also, the Company benefited from higher trust revenue and increased gains on asset sales in 2007.

declining interest rate environment.

NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN. . . .TheMARGIN … The Company’s net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a primary source of the Company’s earnings; it is affected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The following table summarizes the Company’s net interest income performance for each of the past three years:

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
Interest income $47,819  $49,379  $46,565 
Interest expense  18,702   25,156   22,087 
          
Net interest income  29,117   24,223   24,478 
Net interest margin  3.64%  3.06%  3.12%
     2008

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS) 

Interest income

  $44,831   $47,455   $47,819  

Interest expense

   12,489    15,021    18,702  
             

Net interest income

   32,342    32,434    29,117  

Net interest margin

   3.79  3.72  3.64

2010 NET INTEREST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW...OVERVIEW … The Company’s net interest income declined modestly in 2008 increased2010 by $4.9 milliononly $92,000 or 20.2% from the prior year0.28% when compared to 2009. Careful management of funding costs during a period when interest revenues declined and the balance sheet contracted allowed the Company to increase its net interest margin was up by 58seven basis points overto average 3.79% for the same comparative period. The Company’s balance sheet positioning allowed it to benefit from the significant Federal Reserve reductions in short-termfull year of 2010. This solid net interest rates and the return to a more traditional positively sloped yield curve. As a resultmargin performance is reflective of these changes, the Company’s interest expense onstrong liquidity position and its ability to reduce its funding costs during a period of deposit growth. Specifically, total deposits averaged $803 million for the full year of 2010, an increase of $41 million or 5.3% over 2009. Growth in non-interest bearing demand deposits was even greater at 7.4%. The Company believes that uncertainties in the economy have contributed to growth in money market accounts, certificates of deposit and borrowings declined at a faster rate than the interest income ondemand deposits as consumers and businesses have looked for safety in well capitalized community banks like AmeriServ Financial. Overall, total loans and investments.loans held for sale have declined by $45 million or 6.2% since December 31, 2009 as the Company has successfully focused on reducing its commercial real estate exposure and non-performing assets during this period of economic weakness. We expect the declining commercial real estate trend to continue during the first half of 2011. Additionally, an improved earning asset mix withour pipelines for new commercial and industrial lending opportunities continue to be thin. Consequently, we expect to book fewer investment securitiesnew commercial loans, which will cause the loan portfolio to shrink further through normal amortization and more loans outstanding also contributed to the increasedsome anticipated early loan pay-offs. This will put pressure on our net interest income and margin in 2008. Total loans increased by $71 million or 11.1% with $43 million of the growth occurring during the fourth quarter of 2008 as we were able to extend credit to quality borrowers within the communities in which we operate. Overall, net interest income has now increased for eight consecutive quarters.

margin.

COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME: 20082010 VERSUS 2007...2009 … Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company’s total interest income for 2008in 2010 decreased by $1.6$2.6 million when compared to 2007.2009. This decrease was due to a 27an 18 basis point decreasedecline in the earning asset yield to 5.96%.5.26%, and a $9.9 million decrease in average earning assets due to the previously mentioned decline in loans. Investment securities have grown over this period, but not enough to absorb the overall decline in total loans. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 4514 basis points to 6.37%5.58% while the yield on total investment securities dropped by 54 basis points to 3.54%. Both of these yield declines reflect the impact of the lower interest rate environment that has now been in place for over 2 years. New investment securities and reflectsloans that are being booked typically have yields that are below the rate on the maturing instruments that they are replacing. Also the asset mix shift with fewer dollars invested in loans and more dollars invested in lower yielding short duration investment securities also negatively impacts the earning asset yield. Overall, the decline in loans combined with deposit growth caused the Company’s loan to deposit ratio to average 87.3% in 2010 compared to 95.1% in 2009.

The Company’s total interest expense for 2010 decreased by $2.5 million, or 16.9%, when compared to 2009. This decrease in interest expense was due to a lower cost of funds as the cost of interest bearing liabilities declined by 32 basis points to 1.75%. Management’s decision to reduce interest rates paid on all deposit

categories has not had any negative impact on deposit growth as consumers have sought the safety provided by well-capitalized community banks like AmeriServ Financial. This decrease in funding costs was aided by a drop in interest expense associated with an $11.1 million decrease in the volume of interest bearing liabilities. Specifically, the average balance of all FHLB borrowings declined by $43.1 million, but was partially offset by a $32 million increase in interest bearing deposits. Additionally, the Company’s funding mix also benefited from an $8.5 million increase in non-interest bearing demand deposits. Overall, in 2010 the Company had the discipline to further reduce its reliance on borrowings as a funding source as wholesale borrowings averaged only 2.3% of total assets. The Company also does not use brokered certificates of deposit as a funding source.

2009 NET INTEREST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW … The Company’s net interest income in 2009 increased by $3.3 million, or 11.4%, from 2008 and the net interest margin rose by 8 basis points to 3.72% over the same comparative period. The increased net interest income and margin resulted from a combination of good balance sheet growth and the pricing benefits achieved from a steeper yield curve in 2009. Specifically, total loans averaged $725 million in 2009, an increase of $83 million or 13.0% over 2008. This growth caused overall loan interest revenue to increase in 2009 despite the lower interest rate environment. The Company’s strong liquidity position had been supported by total deposits that averaged $763 million in 2009, an increase of $68 million or 9.8% over 2008. The Company believed that uncertainties in the financial markets and the economy has contributed to growth in money market accounts, certificates of deposit, and demand deposits as consumers looked for safety in well capitalized community banks like AmeriServ Financial Bank. Additionally, the Company benefited from a favorable $3.7 million decline in interest expense caused by the more rapid downward repricing of both deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings due to the market decline in short-term interest rates.

COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME: 2009 VERSUS 2008 … Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company’s total interest income in 2009 decreased by $364,000 when compared to 2008. This decrease was due to a 52 basis point decline in the earning asset yield to 5.44%, that was partially mitigated by a $79 million increase in average earning assets due to the previously mentioned strong loan growth. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 65 basis points to 5.72% and reflected the lower interest rate environment in 20082009 as the Federal Reserve had reduced the federal funds rate by 400approximately 200 basis points duringin response to the financial market crisis that hit in the third quarter 2008. The total investment securities yield however, has increaseddecreased by five5 basis points to 4.13%4.08% while the yield on short-term money market funds dropped by 161 basis points to 0.35%. The Company took advantageBoth of the positively slopedthese yield curve in the second quarter of 2008 to position the investment portfolio for better future earnings by selling some ofdrops reflected the lower yielding securitiesinterest rate environment in the portfolio at a loss and replacing them with higher yielding securities with a modestly longer duration.

2009.

The $8.8$79 million, or 9.9%, increase in the volume of average earning assets was due to a $34.3an $83 million, or 5.6%13.0%, increase in average loans, partially offset by a $21.6$7 million, or 12.3%4.9%, decrease in average investment securities. TheThis loan growth was driven by increased

21


commercial real estate loans as a result of successful new business development efforts, particularly in the suburban Pittsburgh market. The Company has found increased commercial lending opportunities in the Pittsburgh market in the second half of 2008 and first half of 2009 due to the retrenchment of several larger competitors as a result of the turmoil in the financial markets. This loan growth caused the Company’s loan to deposit ratio to average 95.1% in 2009 compared to 92.4% in 2008. The decline in investment securities was caused by the call of certain agency securities and ongoing cash flow from mortgage-backed securities. The Company hashad elected to utilize this cash from lower yielding investment securities to fund higher yielding loans in an effort to improve the Company’s earning asset yield.
yield and net interest margin. The Company did not expect the investment securities portfolio to shrink any further in order to maintain sufficient security balances for pledging purposes.

The Company’s total interest expense for 20082009 decreased by $6.5$3.7 million, or 25.7%19.7%, when compared to 2007.2008. This decrease in interest expense was due to a lower cost of funds. The totalfunds as the cost of funds for 2008 declined by 94 basis points to 2.75%both deposits and was driven down by lowerborrowings repriced downward with the reductions in short-term interest rates and a more favorable funding mix in 2008.rates. Specifically, the costscost of interest bearing deposits decreaseddeclined by 8567 basis points to 2.69%2.02%, while the cost of short-termall FHLB borrowings dropped by 293106 basis points to 1.96%1.22%. Total averageThis decrease in funding costs more than offset the additional interest expense associated

with a $46 million increase in the volume of interest bearing deposits decreased by $60.2 million or 9.3%liabilities due almost entirely to a decline in Trust Company specialty deposits as wholesale borrowings provided the Company with a lower cost funding source than these deposits for the majority of 2008. Wholesale borrowings averaged 9.3% of total assets in 2008.previously mentioned deposit growth. Additionally, the Company’s funding mix also benefited from a $5.3$3.9 million increase in non-interest bearing demand deposits and an increasedeposits. Overall, in retail money market deposits as customers have opted for short-term liquidity during this period of volatility and decline in the equity markets. With the recent increase in the Company’s loan to deposit ratio to slightly over 100%,2009 the Company expectshad the discipline to more actively utilize the trust specialty depositsfurther reduce its reliance on borrowings as a funding source in 2009 along with a more aggressive strategy to try to grow retail deposits.

     2007 NET INTEREST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW...as wholesale borrowings averaged only 6.7% of total assets. The Company’s 2007 net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis decreased by $260,000 or 1.1% from 2006 due to a six basis point drop in the net interest margin to 3.06%. The decline in both net interest income and net interest margin resulted from the Company’s cost of funds increasing at a faster pace than the earning asset yield, particularly during the first six months of 2007. This resulted from deposit customer preference for higher yieldingCompany did not use brokered certificates of deposit and money market accounts due to the inverted/flat yield curve with short-term interest rates exceeding intermediate to longer term rates during that period. This net interest margin pressure overshadowed solid loan and deposit growth within our community bank. Average loans in 2007 grew by $43 million or 7.7% while average deposits increased by $14 million or 1.9% when compared to 2006. However, the Federal Reserve reductions in short-term interest rates that began late in the third quarter of 2007 favorably impacted the Company. On a quarterly basis, the Company’s net interest margin showed improvement throughout 2007 increasing from 2.97% in the first quarter to 3.08% in the fourth quarter. This helped to reverse a trend of four consecutive quarters of net interest income and margin contraction experienced in 2006 where the margin declined from 3.20% to a low of 2.93% in the fourth quarter.
     COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME: 2007 VERSUS 2006...Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company’s total interest income for 2007 increased by $2.8 million or 6.0% when compared to 2006. This increase was due to a 30 basis point increase in the earning asset yield to 6.23%, and was aided by an $8 million increase in average earning assets. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio increased by 18 basis points to 6.82% and reflects the higher interest rate environment in place during most of 2007, which allowed the Company to book new loans at rates moderately higher than those currently in the portfolio. The yield on the total investment securities portfolio increased by 12 basis points to 4.08% as the Company has generally elected to not replace maturing lower yielding securities. Also reduced amortization expense on the Company’s lower balance of mortgage-backed securities favorably impacted the portfolio yield.
     The $8 million increase in average earning assets was due to a $43 million or 7.7% increase in average loans, partially mitigated by a $38 million or 17.0% reduction in average investment securities. This loan growth was driven by increased commercial and commercial real estate loans as a result of successful new business development efforts. In 2007 the Company focused on growing the higher yielding and more rate sensitive commercial loans at a faster rate than the commercial real-estate loans. The decline in investment securities was caused by regularly scheduled maturities and ongoing cash flow from mortgage-backed securities.
     The Company’s total interest expense for 2007 increased by $3.1 million or 13.9% when compared to 2006. This increase in interest expense was due to a higher cost of funds and an increase in total average interest bearing liabilities which were $4.0 million higher in 2007. The total cost of funds for 2007 increased by 43 basis points to 3.69% and was driven up by higher short-term interest rates and increased deposits when compared to 2006. Specifically, total average deposits increased by $14 million or 1.9% compared to 2006, while the cost of interest bearing deposits increased by 49 basis points to 3.54%. The increased cost of deposits reflects the higher short-term interest rate environment for the majority of 2007 as well as a customer movement of funds from lower cost savings accounts into higher yielding certificates of deposit. Average wholesale borrowings declined by $9 million in 2007 and averaged only 2.8% of total assets in 2007.
funding source.

The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis setting forth (i) average assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity, (ii) interest income earned on interest earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iv) interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing

22


liabilities), and (v) net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets). For purposes of these tables loan balances excludeinclude non-accrual loans, butand interest income recorded on non-accrual loans on a cash basis, which is deemed to be immaterial, is included in interest income. Regulatory stock is included within available for sale investment securities for this analysis. Additionally, a tax rate of approximately 34% is used to compute tax-equivalent yields.
                                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
      INTEREST          INTEREST          INTEREST    
  AVERAGE  INCOME/  YIELD/  AVERAGE  INCOME/  YIELD/  AVERAGE  INCOME/  YIELD/ 
  BALANCE  EXPENSE  RATE  BALANCE  EXPENSE  RATE  BALANCE  EXPENSE  RATE 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Interest earning assets:                                    
Loans, net of unearned income $641,766  $41,100   6.37% $607,507  $41,654   6.82% $564,173  $37,693   6.64%
Deposits with banks  583   13   2.23   500   20   4.00   706   23   3.26 
Federal funds sold  114   4   3.54   2,278   121   5.26   62   3   5.21 
Short-term investment in money market funds  7,136   140   1.96   8,857   203   2.29   5,573   188   3.37 
Investment securities:                                    
Available for sale  136,344   5,770   4.03   155,003   6,433   3.96   191,683   7,680   3.92 
Held to maturity  17,292   875   5.06   20,257   1,039   5.04   24,448   1,074   4.39 
                               
Total investment securities  153,636   6,645   4.13   175,260   7,472   4.08   216,131   8,754   3.96 
                               
TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS/ INTEREST INCOME  803,235   47,902   5.96   794,402   49,470   6.23   786,645   46,661   5.93 
                               
Non-interest earning assets:                                    
Cash and due from banks  16,786           17,750           18,841         
Premises and equipment  9,333           8,623           8,324         
Other assets  72,249           70,369           68,920         
Allowance for loan losses  (7,837)          (7,755)          (8,750)        
                                  
TOTAL ASSETS $893,766          $883,389          $873,980         
                                  
Interest bearing liabilities:                                    
Interest bearing deposits:                                    
Interest bearing demand $64,683  $654   1.01% $67,132  $1,184   1.76% $57,817  $606   1.05%
Savings  70,255   535   0.76   71,922   549   0.76   81,964   643   0.78 
Money market  107,843   2,417   2.24   158,947   6,040   3.80   172,029   5,741   3.34 
Other time  341,185   12,074   3.54   346,134   15,038   4.34   319,220   12,242   3.83 
                               
Total interest bearing deposits  583,966   15,680   2.69   644,135   22,811   3.54   631,030   19,232   3.05 
                               
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings  71,636   1,403   1.96   19,844   972   4.89   32,821   1,672   5.09 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  11,725   499   4.26   4,852   253   5.22   967   63   6.45 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  13,085   1,120   8.57   13,085   1,120   8.57   13,085   1,120   8.57 
                               
TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES/INTEREST EXPENSE  680,412   18,702   2.75   681,916   25,156   3.69   677,903   22,087   3.26 
                               
Non-interest bearing liabilities:                                    
Demand deposits  110,601           105,306           104,266         
Other liabilities  9,816           9,703           6,765         
Stockholders’ equity  92,937           86,464           85,046         
                                  
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $893,766          $883,389          $873,980         
                                  
Interest rate spread          3.21           2.54           2.67 
Net interest income/net interest margin      29,200   3.64%      24,314   3.06%      24,574   3.12%
Tax-equivalent adjustment      (83)          (91)          (96)    
                                  
Net interest income     $29,117          $24,223          $24,478     
                                  

23


  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  AVERAGE
BALANCE
  INTEREST
INCOME/
EXPENSE
  YIELD/
RATE
  AVERAGE
BALANCE
  INTEREST
INCOME/
EXPENSE
  YIELD/
RATE
  AVERAGE
BALANCE
  INTEREST
INCOME/
EXPENSE
  YIELD/
RATE
 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 

Interest earning assets:

         

Loans, net of unearned income

 $701,502   $39,129    5.58 $725,241   $41,488    5.72 $641,766   $41,100    6.37

Deposits with banks

  1,795    1    0.06    1,782    4    0.23    583    13    2.23  

Federal funds sold

  4,375    16    0.37    490    1    0.11    114    4    3.54  

Short-term investment in money market funds

  3,834    4    0.10    9,022    30    0.35    7,136    140    1.96  

Investment securities:

         

Available for sale

  151,691    5,281    3.48    131,804    5,340    4.05    136,344    5,770    4.03  

Held to maturity

  9,574    433    4.52    14,346    630    4.36    17,292    875    5.06  
                           

Total investment securities

  161,265    5,714    3.54    146,150    5,970    4.08    153,636    6,645    4.13  
                           

TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS/ INTEREST INCOME

  872,771    44,864    5.26    882,685    47,493    5.44    803,235    47,902    5.96  
                           

Non-interest earning assets:

         

Cash and due from banks

  15,297      14,498      16,786    

Premises and equipment

  10,212      9,213      9,333    

Other assets

  80,206      72,574      72,249    

Allowance for loan losses

  (21,218    (13,382    (7,837  
                  

TOTAL ASSETS

 $957,268     $965,588     $893,766    
                  

Interest bearing liabilities:

         

Interest bearing deposits:

         

Interest bearing demand

 $58,118   $176    0.30 $62,494   $256    0.41 $64,683   $654    1.01

Savings

  77,381    397    0.51    72,350    530    0.73    70,255    535    0.76  

Money market

  186,560    1,622    0.87    169,823    2,437    1.44    107,843    2,417    2.24  

Other time

  358,472    8,750    2.44    343,841    9,886    2.88    341,185    12,074    3.54  
                           

Total interest bearing deposits

  680,531    10,945    1.61    648,508    13,109    2.02    583,966    15,680    2.69  
                           

Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings

  3,119    22    0.71    21,028    140    0.67    71,636    1,403    1.96  

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

  18,694    402    2.15    43,934    652    1.48    11,725    499    4.26  

Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures

  13,085    1,120    8.57    13,085    1,120    8.57    13,085    1,120    8.57  
                           

TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES/INTEREST EXPENSE

  715,429    12,489    1.75    726,555    15,021    2.07    680,412    18,702    2.75  
                           

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

         

Demand deposits

  122,963      114,473      110,601    

Other liabilities

  11,188      11,428      9,816    

Stockholders’ equity

  107,688      113,132      92,937    
                  

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 $957,268     $965,588     $893,766    
                  

Interest rate spread

    3.51      3.37      3.21  

Net interest income/net interest margin

   32,375    3.79   32,472    3.72   29,200    3.64

Tax-equivalent adjustment

   (33    (38    (83 
                  

Net interest income

  $32,342     $32,434     $29,117   
                  

Net interest income may also be analyzed by segregating the volume and rate components of interest income and interest expense. The table below sets forth an analysis of volume and rate changes in net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis. For purposes of this table, changes in interest income and interest expense are allocated to volume and rate categories based upon the respective percentage changes in average balances and average rates. Changes in net interest income that could not be specifically identified as either a rate or volume change were allocated proportionately to changes in volume and changes in rate.
                         
  2008 vs. 2007  2007 vs. 2006 
  INCREASE (DECREASE)  INCREASE (DECREASE) 
  DUE TO CHANGE IN:  DUE TO CHANGE IN: 
  AVERAGE          AVERAGE       
  VOLUME  RATE  TOTAL  VOLUME  RATE  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
INTEREST EARNED ON:                        
Loans, net of unearned income $3,258  $(3,812) $(554) $2,928  $1,033  $3,961 
Deposits with banks  4   (11)  (7)  (14)  11   (3)
Federal funds sold  (87)  (30)  (117)  118      118 
Short-term investments in money market funds  (36)  (27)  (63)  33   (18)  15 
Investment securities:                        
Available for sale  (777)  114   (663)  (1,317)  70   (1,247)
Held to maturity  (169)  5   (164)  (257)  222   (35)
                   
Total investment securities  (946)  119   (827)  (1,574)  292   (1,282)
                   
Total interest income  2,193   (3,761)  (1,568)  1,491   1,318   2,809 
                   
INTEREST PAID ON:                        
Interest bearing demand deposits  (42)  (489)  (531)  111   467   578 
Savings deposits  (14)     (14)  (78)  (16)  (94)
Money market  (1,591)  (2,032)  (3,623)  (369)  668   299 
Other time deposits  (213)  (2,751)  (2,964)  1,084   1,712   2,796 
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings  561   (129)  432   (637)  (63)  (700)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  283   (37)  246   199   (9)  190 
                   
Total interest expense  (1,016)  (5,438)  (6,454)  310   2,759   3,069 
                   
Change in net interest income $3,209  $1,677  $4,886  $1,181  $(1,441) $(260)
                   

   2010 vs. 2009  2009 vs. 2008 
   INCREASE (DECREASE)
DUE TO CHANGE IN:
  INCREASE (DECREASE)
DUE TO CHANGE IN:
 
   AVERAGE
VOLUME
  RATE  TOTAL  AVERAGE
VOLUME
  RATE  TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

INTEREST EARNED ON:

       

Loans, net of unearned income

  $(1,350 $(1,009 $(2,359 $1,146   $(758 $388  

Deposits with banks

       (3  (3  15    (24  (9

Federal funds sold

   3        3    9    (12  (3

Short-term investments in money market funds

   (16  2    (14  (78  (32  (110

Investment securities:

       

Available for sale

   805    (864  (59  (156  (274  (430

Held to maturity

   (216  19    (197  (265  20    (245
                         

Total investment securities

   589    (845  (256  (421  (254  (675
                         

Total interest income

   (774  (1,855  (2,629  671    (1,080  (409
                         

INTEREST PAID ON:

       

Interest bearing demand deposits

   (17  (63  (80  (410  12    (398

Savings deposits

   40    (173  (133  (5      (5

Money market

   270    (1,085  (815  526    (506  20  

Other time deposits

   439    (1,575  (1,136  (2,158  (30  (2,188

Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings

   (127  9    (118  (1,916  653    (1,263

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

   (1,248  998    (250  1,046    (893  153  
                         

Total interest expense

   (643  (1,889  (2,532  (2,917  (764  (3,681
                         

Change in net interest income

  $(131 $34   $(97 $3,588   $(316 $3,272  
                         

LOAN QUALITY. . .AmeriServQUALITY …AmeriServ Financial’s written lending policies require underwriting, loan documentation, and credit analysis standards to be met prior to funding any loan. After the loan has been approved and funded, continued periodic credit review is required. The Company’s policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $250,000 within a 12-month period. The Company has also identified three pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment. These separate pools are for small business loans $250,000 or less, residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and removed from the pool if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative economic concerns indicate impairment. The following table sets forth information concerning AmeriServ Financial’sAmeriServ’s loan delinquency and other non-performing assets.

             
  AT DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
  (IN THOUSANDS,
  EXCEPT PERCENTAGES)
Total loan past due 30 to 89 days $1,195  $3,559  $2,991 
Total non-accrual loans  3,377   5,238  ��2,286 
Total non-performing assets(1)  4,572   5,280   2,292 
Loan delinquency as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  0.17%  0.56%  0.51%
Non-accrual loans as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  0.48   0.82   0.39 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.65   0.83   0.39 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets  0.47   0.58   0.26 

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   

(IN THOUSANDS,

EXCEPT PERCENTAGES)

 

Total loan past due 30 to 89 days

  $2,791   $11,408   $4,396  

Total non-accrual loans

   12,289    17,116    3,377  

Total non-performing assets including TDR(1)

   14,364    18,337    4,572  

Loan delinquency as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income

   0.41  1.58  0.62

Non-accrual loans as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income

   1.81    2.37    0.48  

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned

   2.12    2.53    0.65  

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets

   1.51    1.89    0.47  

Total classified loans (loans rated substandard or doubtful)

  $39,627   $48,587   $13,235  

(1)Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans that are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments, (iii) performing loans classified as troubled debt restructuring and (iii)(iv) other real estate owned.
     Loan

As a result of successful ongoing problem credit resolution efforts, the Company realized asset quality improvements in 2010. These improvements are evidenced by reduced delinquency and lower levels have now remained well below 1%of non-performing assets and classified loans. Specifically, there was an $11 million decrease in non-performing assets during the fourth quarter of 2010. Only $1 million of this decline in non-performing assets related to actual loan losses realized through net charge-offs. The largest item responsible for the past three years and reflectlower level of non-performing assets in 2010 was the removal of a $9 million commercial loan relationship to a borrower in the restaurant industry from non-accrual status due to continued good loan portfolio quality. Non-performing assets have remainedoperating performance improvement. Classified loans also favorably dropped by $9.5 million in a range of $2.3 million2010 but still remain high by historical standards. This is due to $5.3 million for the past three years and ended 2008 at

24


$4.6 million or 0.65% of total loans. The $708,000 decline since year-end 2007 reflects the successful workout during the first quarter of 2008downgrade of the Company’s largest non-performingrating classification of numerous commercial mortgage loan.loans that are experiencing operating weakness in the recessionary economy but are still performing. While we are pleased with our asset quality,that total loan delinquency dropped back below 1.0% in 2010, we continue to closely monitor the portfolio given the recessionary economy and the number of relatively large sizedlarge-sized commercial and commercial real estate loans within the portfolio. As of December 31, 2008,2010, the 25 largest credits represented 29.0%33.2% of total loans outstanding.
     The Company had two loans totaling $1.4 million at December 31, 2008, that had been restructured which involved granting loan rates less than that of the market rate. Both of these loans are currently in non-accrual status and are currently not performing with the amended terms.

ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES. . .LOSSES … As described in more detail in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section of this MD&A, the Company uses a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The Company believes this is a critical accounting policy since it involves significant estimates and judgments. The allowance consists of three elements;elements: 1) reservesan allowance established on specifically identified problem loans, 2) formula driven general reserves established for loan categories based upon historical loss experience and other

qualitative factors, which include delinquency and non-performing loan trends, economic trends, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies, and trends in policy, financial information, and documentation exceptions, and 3) a general risk reserve which provides support for variance from our assessment of the previously listed qualitative factors, provides protection against credit risks resulting from other inherent risk factors contained in the bank’sCompany’s loan portfolio, and recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances. The qualitative factors used in the formula driven general reserves are evaluated quarterly (and revised if necessary) by the Company’s management to establish allocations whichthat accommodate each of the listed risk factors. The following table sets forth changes in the allowance for loan losses and certain ratios for the periods ended.

                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PERCENTAGES) 
Balance at beginning of year $7,252  $8,092  $9,143  $9,893  $11,682 
Transfer to reserve for unfunded loan commitments              (122)
                
Charge-offs:                    
Commercial  (405)  (934)  (769)  (214)  (1,107)
Commercial loans secured by real estate  (811)  (12)  (2)  (113)  (1,928)
Real estate-mortgage  (132)  (79)  (76)  (145)  (139)
Consumer  (365)  (307)  (397)  (403)  (867)
                
Total charge-offs  (1,713)  (1,332)  (1,244)  (875)  (4,041)
                
Recoveries:                    
Commercial  299   40   115   77   410 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  39   38   41   15   7 
Real estate-mortgage  26   12   19   52   65 
Consumer  82   102   143   156   134 
                
Total recoveries  446   192   318   300   616 
                
Net charge-offs  (1,267)  (1,140)  (926)  (575)  (3,425)
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)  (175)  1,758 
                
Balance at end of year $8,910  $7,252  $8,092  $9,143  $9,893 
                
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income:                    
Average for the year $644,896  $610,685  $567,435  $528,545  $503,742 
At December 31  707,108   636,155   589,435   550,602   521,416 
As a percent of average loans and loans held for sale:                    
Net charge-offs  0.20%  0.19%  0.16%  0.11%  0.68%
Provision for loan losses  0.45   0.05   (0.02)  (0.03)  0.35 
Allowance as a percent of each of the following:                    
Total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  1.26   1.14   1.37   1.66   1.90 
Total delinquent loans (past due 30 to 89 days)  745.61   203.77   270.54   209.65   298.79 
Total non-accrual loans  263.84   138.45   353.98   220.37   255.70 
Total non-performing assets  194.88   137.35   353.05   211.89   254.06 
Allowance as a multiple of net charge-offs  7.03x  6.36x  8.74x  15.90x  2.89x
Total classified loans (loans rated substandard or doubtful) $13,235  $10,839  $15,163  $20,208  $22,921 
     The

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PERCENTAGES) 

Balance at beginning of year

  $19,685   $8,910   $7,252   $8,092   $9,143  

Charge-offs:

      

Commercial

   (835  (3,810  (405  (934  (769

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   (4,221  (840  (811  (12  (2

Real estate-mortgage

   (293  (128  (132  (79  (76

Consumer

   (282  (352  (365  (307  (397
                     

Total charge-offs

   (5,631  (5,130  (1,713  (1,332  (1,244
                     

Recoveries:

      

Commercial

   226    601    299    40    115  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   48    14    39    38    41  

Real estate-mortgage

   42    27    26    12    19  

Consumer

   145    113    82    102    143  
                     

Total recoveries

   461    755    446    192    318  
                     

Net charge-offs

   (5,170  (4,375  (1,267  (1,140  (926

Provision for loan losses

   5,250    15,150    2,925    300    (125
                     

Balance at end of year

  $19,765   $19,685   $8,910   $7,252   $8,092  
                     

Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income:

      

Average for the year

  $701,502   $725,241   $644,896   $610,685   $567,435  

At December 31

   678,181    722,904    707,108    636,155    589,435  

As a percent of average loans and loans held for sale:

      

Net charge-offs

   0.74  0.60  0.20  0.19  0.16

Provision for loan losses

   0.75    2.09    0.45    0.05    (0.02

Allowance as a percent of each of the following:

      

Total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income

   2.91    2.72    1.26    1.14    1.37  

Total delinquent loans (past due 30 to 89 days)

   708.17    172.55    202.68    203.77    270.54  

Total non-accrual loans

   160.83    115.01    263.84    138.45    353.98  

Total non-performing assets

   137.60    107.35    194.88    137.35    225.15  

Allowance as a multiple of net charge-offs

   3.82  4.50  7.03  6.36  8.74

For the year-ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a $2.9$5.3 million loan loss provision for 2008loan losses compared to a $300,000 loan loss$15.2 million provision for 2007. The higher loanthe 2009 year, or a decrease of $9.9 million. Proactive monitoring of our asset quality has allowed us to carefully adjust downward the provision in 2008 was caused by the Company’s decision to strengthen its allowance for loan losses duein each quarter of 2010 while still maintaining solid loan loss reserve coverage ratios. We actively identify and seek prompt

resolution to problem credits in order to limit actual losses. Actual credit losses realized through charge-offs in 2010 approximated the downgrade of the rating classification of several specific performing commercial loans, uncertainties in the local and national economies and strong growth in total loans in 2008. Overallprovision levels, but are higher than 2009. For 2010, net charge-offs have trended upward over the past 4 years. Specifically, for 2008, net

25


charge-offs have amounted to $1.3$5.2 million or 0.20%0.74% of total loans compared to net charge-offs of $1.1$4.4 million or 0.19%0.60% of total loans for 2007. Overall,2009. The higher charge-offs in 2010 largely relate to two non-performing commercial real-estate loans, one of which was completely resolved in the first quarter ($1.2 million charge-off) and the second of which relates to a student housing project ($2.4 million charge-off) which the Company fully resolved through a note sale during the fourth quarter of 2010. In summary, the allowance for loan losses provided 195%145% coverage of non-performing assetsloans and was 1.26%2.91% of total loans at December 31, 20082010, compared to 137%115% of non-performing assetsloans and 1.14%2.72% of total loans at December 31, 2007. 2009.

The Company has no direct exposureappropriately strengthened its allowance for loan losses in 2009 in response to sub-prime mortgagedeterioration in asset quality. This deterioration in asset quality in 2009 was evidenced by higher levels of non-performing loans and classified loans than in 2008 and reflected the results of a comprehensive review of loans in either the commercial loan or investment portfolios.

     For 2007,and commercial real estate portfolio in the second half of 2009. Overall, the Company recorded a $15.2 million provision for loan losses amounted to $300,000in 2009, compared to a negative loan loss$2.9 million provision for 2008, or an increase of $125,000 for 2006 and $175,000 for 2005. The Company did experience$12.2 million. Actual credit losses realized through charge-off, however, were well below the provision level, but higher net charge-offsthan in 2007, as2008. For 2009, net charge-offs amounted to $1.1$4.4 million or 0.19%0.60% of total loans, compared to net charge-offs of $926,000$1.3 million or 0.16%0.20% of total loans for 2006. The Company’s 20072008. Of the 2009 net charge-offs, were materially impacted by a third$3.3 million was realized in the fourth quarter $875,000 complete charge-offand reflected the resolution of a commercial loan that resulted from fraud committed byone of the borrower.
Company’s larger non-performing loans.

The following schedule sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among various loan categories. This allocation is determined by using the consistent quarterly procedural discipline that was previously discussed. The entire allowance for loan losses is available to absorb future loan losses in any loan category.

                                         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
      PERCENT OF      PERCENT OF      PERCENT OF      PERCENT OF      PERCENT OF 
      LOANS IN      LOANS IN      LOANS IN      LOANS IN      LOANS IN 
      EACH      EACH      EACH      EACH      EACH 
      CATEGORY      CATEGORY      CATEGORY      CATEGORY      CATEGORY 
      TO      TO      TO      TO      TO 
  AMOUNT  LOANS  AMOUNT  LOANS  AMOUNT  LOANS  AMOUNT  LOANS  AMOUNT  LOANS 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Commercial $2,841   15.6% $2,074   18.7% $2,361   15.6% $3,312   14.6% $2,173   13.8%
Commercial loans secured by real estate  4,467   50.0   3,632   44.8   3,546   45.8   3,644   45.3   5,519   43.2 
Real estate-mortgage  325   31.1   316   33.9   424   35.6   381   36.5   346   38.9 
Consumer  925   3.3   835   2.6   1,000   3.0   1,022   3.6   1,074   4.1 
Allocation to general risk  352      395      761      784      781    
                                    
Total $8,910   100.0% $7,252   100.0% $8,092   100.0% $9,143   100.0% $9,893   100.0%
                               

  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  AMOUNT  PERCENT
OF LOANS
IN

EACH
CATEGORY

TO
LOANS
  AMOUNT  PERCENT
OF LOANS
IN

EACH
CATEGORY

TO
LOANS
  AMOUNT  PERCENT
OF  LOANS
IN

EACH
CATEGORY
TO
LOANS
  AMOUNT  PERCENT
OF  LOANS
IN

EACH
CATEGORY
TO
LOANS
  AMOUNT  PERCENT
OF  LOANS
IN

EACH
CATEGORY
TO
LOANS
 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 

Commercial

 $3,851    11.5 $4,756    13.3 $2,841    15.6 $2,074    18.7 $2,361    15.6

Commercial loans secured by real estate

  12,717    54.6 ��  12,692    54.9    4,467    50.0    3,632    44.8    3,546    45.8  

Real estate-mortgage

  1,117    31.1    1,015    29.2    1,004    31.1    979    33.9    1,206    35.6  

Consumer

  206    2.8    204    2.6    246    3.3    172    2.6    218    3.0  

Allocation to general risk

  1,874    —      1,018    —      352    —      395    —      761    —    
                         

Total

 $19,765    100.0 $19,685    100.0 $8,910    100.0 $7,252    100.0 $8,092    100.0
                                        

Even though residential real estate-mortgage loans comprise 31.1% of the Company’s total loan portfolio, only $325,000$1,117,000 or 3.6%5.7% of the total allowance for loan losses is allocated against this loan category. The residential real estate-mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company’s five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category and other qualitative factors. The disproportionately higher allocations for commercial loans and commercial loans secured by real estate reflect the increased credit risk associated with this type of lending, the Company’s historical loss experience in these categories, and other qualitative factors.

Based on the Company’s allowance for loan loss methodology and the related assessment of the inherent risk factors contained within the Company’s loan portfolio, we believe that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at December 31, 20082010 to cover losses within the Company’s loan portfolio.

NON-INTEREST INCOME. . INCOME …Non-interest income for 20082010 totalled $16.4$14.0 million; an increase of $1.7 million$39,000, or 11.7%0.3%, from 2007.2009. Factors contributing to this increasedrelatively stable level of non-interest income in 20082010 included:

-a $1.4 million increase in revenue from bank owned life insurance (BOLI) due to increased payments of death claims in 2008.
-a $170,000 increase in gains on loans held for sale due to increased residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market in 2008. There were $37.5 million of residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market in 2008 compared to $26.7 million in 2007.
-a $490,000 or 19.0% increase in deposit service charges due to increased overdraft fees and greater service charge revenue that resulted from a realignment of the bank’s checking accounts to include more fee based products.
-a $195,000 decrease in investment advisory fees as a result of a drop in assets under management due to the declines experienced in the equity markets in 2008.

a $485,000, or 17.5% decrease in service charges on deposit accounts in 2010. Customers have maintained higher balances in their checking accounts, which have resulted in fewer overdraft fees in 2010. Additionally, regulatory changes which took effect in mid-August and are designed to limit customer overdraft fees on debit card transactions also negatively impacted deposit service charges.

26

a $307,000, or 47.2%, increase in gains realized on residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market in 2010. As a result of another strong year of mortgage purchase and refinance activity in the Company’s primary market, there were $69 million of residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market in 2010. Overall, the Company sold approximately 68% of its new residential mortgage loan production into the secondary market in order to help manage long term interest rate risk.


a $217,000, or 7.6% increase in other income resulting from the increased residential mortgage loan production due to higher underwriting, appraisal and document preparation fees. The Company also benefitted from increased letter of credit fees and interchange revenue in 2010.

Non-interest income for 2007 totaled $14.72009 totalled $13.9 million; a $1.9decrease of $2.5 million, or 14.5% increase15.2%, from the 2006 performance.2008. Factors contributing to the net increase inthis reduced level of non-interest income in 20072009 included:

a $1.5 million decrease in revenue from bank owned life insurance (BOLI) due to fewer death claim payments in 2009.

-a $974,000 increase in investment advisory fees resulting from the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors in March 2007.
-a $234,000 or 3.6% increase in trust fees due to continued successful new business development efforts. The fair market value of trust customer assets grew by 5.9% to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2007.
-a $202,000 increase in gains realized on residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market in 2007. There were $26.3 million of residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market in 2007 compared to $11.5 million in 2006.
-other income increased by $377,000 in 2007 or 15.4% due in part to a $200,000 gain realized on the sale of a bank owned operations facility that was no longer being fully utilized. The Company also benefited from a $69,000 gain realized on the sale of a closed branch facility in the third quarter of 2007.

a $1.2 million, or 16.2%, decline in trust and investment advisory fees due to reductions in the market value of assets managed due to lower equity and real estate values in 2009.

a $174,000, or 36.5%, increase in gains realized on residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market in 2009. As a result of increased mortgage purchase and refinance activity in the Company’s primary market, there were $66 million of residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market in 2009 compared to $37 million in 2008. Overall, the Company sold approximately 70% of its new residential mortgage loan production into the secondary market in 2009 in an effort to limit longer term interest rate risk.

the Company took advantage of market opportunities and generated $164,000 of gains on the sale of investment securities in 2009 compared to a $95,000 loss on a portfolio repositioning strategy executed in 2008.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE. . . EXPENSE …Non-interest expense for 20082010 totalled $35.6$39.7 million; a $965,000$540,000, or 2.8%1.4%, increase from 2007.2009. Factors contributing to the higher non-interest expense in 20082010 included:

a $1.1 million, or 5.2%, increase in salaries and employee benefits expense due to higher medical insurance costs, increased pension expense, and greater incentive compensation expense reflecting increased commission payments related to the residential mortgage activity.

-a $887,000 increase in other expense was largely caused by the non-recurrence of a favorable $400,000 recovery related to previous mortgage servicing operation that was realized in 2007 and greater marketing, other real estate owned, and telephone expenses in 2008. The higher other real estate expense was due to the Company taking possession of a commercial apartment building in the first half of 2008.
-a $385,000 increase in professional fees due to higher legal costs related to the Trust Company matters, and higher consulting and other professional fees related to productivity studies in 2008.
-a $122,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits due primarily to lower medical insurance premiums in 2008 as a result of a switch in carriers.
-a $368,000 decrease in equipment expense resulting from the benefits achieved on the migration to a new core data processing operating system and mainframe processor.
-a $91,000 penalty realized on the prepayment of $6 million of Federal Home Loan Bank debt. This charge resulted from the Company’s decision to retire some higher cost advances and replace them with lower cost current market rate borrowings in order to reduce ongoing interest expense.

Other expense decreased by $613,000 primarily due to higher credit related costs in the prior year. Specifically, other real estate owned expense decreased by $749,000 due to the write-down and operating costs associated with an increased number of other real-estate owned properties in 2009.

a $331,000 or 8.2% increase in professional fees due to increased consulting expenses and recruitment costs in the Trust company and higher legal fees and loan workout costs at the Company.

Non-interest expense for 2007 totaled $34.72009 totalled $39.2 million; a $3.5 million, a $20,000 decreaseor 9.9%, increase from 2006. This overall decline in total non-interest expense occurred even after the inclusion of $820,000 of non-interest expenses from the acquired West Chester Capital Advisors.2008. Factors contributing to the net decrease inhigher non-interest expense in 20072009 included:

a $1.6 million increase in FDIC deposit insurance expense due to the recognition of a $435,000 expense for a special five basis point assessment mandated for all banks and higher recurring insurance premiums due to the need to strengthen the deposit insurance fund.

-salaries and employee benefits increased by $670,000 or 3.6% due primarily to $588,000 of personnel costs related to the West Chester Capital Advisors acquisition and an $85,000 curtailment charge for an early retirement program.
-equipment expense decreased by $304,000 or 12.9% due to lower depreciation expense and maintenance costs.
-FDIC deposit insurance expense declined by $104,000 or 54.2% due to the termination of the Memorandum of Understanding that the Company had been operating under in the first quarter of 2006.
-other expenses declined by $268,000 due to a recovery on a previous mortgage loan servicing operation and our continuing focus on cost reduction and rationalization that has resulted in numerous expense reductions in categories such as software amortization, collection costs, telephone costs, and other taxes and insurance.

a $1.3 million, or 6.8%, increase in salaries and employee benefits expense due to higher sales, related incentive compensation, normal merit increases, severance costs and greater pension expense.

Other expense increased by $1.1 million primarily due to credit related costs. Specifically, other real estate owned expense increased by $715,000 due to the write-down and operating costs associated with an increased number of other real-estate owned properties while the Company also had to fund its reserve for unfunded commitments by an additional $118,000 in 2009.

a $450,000 increase in professional fees due to higher legal costs, recruitment fees, and greater consulting costs associated with a comprehensive review of the Trust Company in the fourth quarter of 2009.

a $757,000 decrease in core deposit amortization as a branch core deposit intangible was fully amortized by the end of the first quarter of 2009.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE. . . EXPENSE …The Company recorded an income tax expense of $1.5$80,000 or 5.9% effective tax rate in 2010 compared to income tax benefit of $3.1 million in 2008 which reflectsor an effective tax rate of 21.1%.38.4% in 2009. The income tax expense recorded in 20072008 was $924,000$1.5 million or an effective tax rate of 23.3%21.1%. The Company was able to record a lower effective tax rate in 2008 despite an increased level of pre-tax incomeall periods due to greater tax-free revenue from BOLI. BOLI is the Company’s largest source of tax-free income. The Company’s deferred tax asset declined to $12.7was $16.1 million at December 31, 2008 due2010 and relates primarily to the ongoing utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and improved market value of the AFS investment portfolio.

27

allowance for loan losses.


SEGMENT RESULTS. . .RESULTS Retail banking’s net income contribution was $1.3 million in 2010 compared to $948,000 in 2009 and $2.7 million in 2008 compared to $2.0 million in 2007 and $1.2 million in 2006.2008. The 2008increased net income is better than 2007in 2010 was due to the positive impactincreased net interest income resulting from a combination of increased deposit balances and lower deposit costs. This exceeded an increased level of non-interest revenue in line items suchexpense. Non-interest income was consistent between years as deposit service charges, bank owned life insurance, and gainincreased gains on residential mortgage loan sales. Retail banking also benefited fromsales into the secondary market were offset by reduced deposit service charges. The lower 2009 net income performance is reflective of increases in FDIC insurance premiums, generally higher other non-interest expenses and reduced non-interest expenses due to lower salaries/benefits costs and reduced occupancy costs as a result of the consolidation and closing of two offices in our branch network.income from BOLI. These negative items more than offset reducedincreased net interest income resulting from the growth in deposits and a higher provision forimproved revenue from residential mortgage loan losses. Retail banking’s net income contribution in 2007 was $776,000 better than 2006 also due to higher non- interest income and lower non-interest expense. The reduced net interest income in 2007 reflected increased deposit costs due tosales into the negative impact that the flat to inverted yield curve had on customers shifting into higher cost certificates of deposit.
secondary market.

The commercial lending segment reported net income wasof $497,000 in 2010 compared to a net loss of $6.4 million in 2009 and net income of $2.3 million in 2008 compared2008. The increased earnings in 2010 were caused primarily by a $9.6 million reduction in the provision for loan losses due to $3.2 millionthe previously discussed improvements in 2007 and $2.6 millionasset quality. The loss in 2006. The reduced net income contribution in 20082009, however, was caused by an increased provision for loan losses due to the previously discussed strengthening of the allowance for loan losses as a result of the deterioration in asset quality experienced in 2009. The loan loss provision allocated to this segment was $12.3 million greater in 2009. Non-interest expenses also increased in 2009 due to higher other real-estate owned expenses and higher non-interest expenses.other loan work out related costs. These factorsnegative items more than offset an increased level of net interest income that resulted fromdue to the strongcommercial loan growth in commercial real-estate loans achieved in 2008. Assets within the commercial lending segment increased by $68 million or 16.9% during 2008 after achieving growth of 21.2% in 2007.

2009.

The trust segment’s net income contribution was $222,000 in 2010 compared to $148,000 in 2009 and $1.3 million in 2008 compared to $1.8 million2008. The increase in 2007. One factor responsiblenet income in 2010 resulted from a decline in expenses particularly within our investment advisory subsidiary. The major reason for the decrease between yearsin 2009 was due to less investment advisory and trustwealth management revenue as a result of fewer assets under management due toresulting from the declines experienced in the equity markets during 2008. Another factor causing the drop between years was increased non-interest expenses due in part to higher legal and professional costs incurred in conjunction with the movement of the union collective investment Build Fund into liquidation status. The Company expects this fund to be liquidated over a 3 to 5 year period given the current real estate markets. Specifically, the most significant decline has been in the value of real-estate assets in the

BUILD and ERECT Funds (a fund that invests union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor) where the market conditions.value of assets has declined from $325 million at December 31, 2008 to $193 million at December 31, 2010. The trust segment’s net income contributionBUILD Fund is in 2007 amounted to $1.8 million, which was up $99,000 from 2006. Successful new business development and the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors caused revenues to increase at a faster pace than expenses in 2007.liquidation status. Overall, the fair market value of trust assets totaled $1.55$1.37 billion at December 31, 2008,2010, a decreasemodest increase of $329$8.4 million, or 17.5%0.6%, from the December 31, 20072009 total of $1.88$1.36 billion.

The investment/parent segment reported net loss of $699,000 in 2010 compared to net income of $379,000 in 2009 and a net loss of $783,000 in 2008 compared to losses of $3.9 million2008. The weaker performance in 2007 and $3.2 million2010 reflects lower net interest income as declining yields in 2006. Thethe investment securities portfolio have negatively impacted this segment. In 2009, the Company’s balance sheet positioning allowed it to benefit from the significant Federal Reserve reductions in short-term interest rates and the return to a more traditional positively sloped yield curve, which has caused net interest income in this segment to increase. This wasAlso, the primary factor responsible for the reduced net lossCompany realized $164,000 of investment security gains in 2008. In addition, the previously discussed investment portfolio repositioning2009 compared to improve the portfolio yield also benefitted this segment.

losses of $95,000 realized in 2008

For greater discussion on the future strategic direction of the Company’s key business segments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Forward Looking Statements which begins on page 35.

Statements.”

BALANCE SHEET. . . SHEET …The Company’s total consolidated assets were $967$949 million at December 31, 2008 compared with $9052010, which was down by $21 million or 2.2% from the $970 million level at December 31, 2009. The Company’s loans and loan held for sale totaled $678 million at December 31, 2007, which represents an increase2010, a decrease of $62$44.7 million or 6.9%. This higher level6.2% from year-end 2009 as the Company focused on reducing its commercial real-estate loan concentration in 2010. Investment securities and short-term money market investments increased by $29.4 million in 2010 due to principal repayments in the loan portfolio being reinvested in the securities portfolio. The $1.3 million increase in premises and equipment related to the costs associated with the construction of assets resulted primarily from an increased level of loans. a new branch office in the State College market.

The Company’s loansdeposits totaled $707$801 million at December 31, 2008,2010, which was $15.2 million or 1.9% higher than December 31, 2009, due to an increase of $71 million or 11.2% from year-end 2007 duein almost all deposit categories. We believe that uncertainties in the financial markets and the economy have contributed to commercial real estate loan growth. The Company’s commercial loan pipelines remain strong as we enter 2009 we expect to see continueda second consecutive year of growth in new loan fundingsour deposits as consumers have looked for safety in well capitalized community banks like AmeriServ Financial Bank. As a result of this deposit growth and asset shrinkage, we were able to reduce FHLB borrowings by $37.3 million during the first half2010. Total FHLB borrowings now represent 1.5% of 2009. Investment securities declined by $16 million in 2008 duetotal assets compared to increased calls of agency securities and normal portfolio cash flow. The Company has elected to utilize this excess cash to fund loan growth. Short-term investments in money market funds increased to $16 million as a portion of the recently received proceeds from the $21 million Capital Purchase Program have been temporarily invested in this product.

     The Company’s deposits totalled $695 million5.3% at December 31, 2008, which was $15 million or 2.2% lower than December 31, 2007 due to a decline in certificates of deposit.2009. The Company electedcontinues to use more wholesale borrowings as a funding source because they cost less than certificates of deposit during the majority of 2008. As a result, total FHLB short-term borrowings and advances increased by $52 million during 2008. The Company’s total stockholders’ equity increased by $23 million since year-end 2007 to $113 million due primarily to the issuance of $21 million of preferred stock through the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program(CPP). The CPP is a voluntary program designed to provide capital to healthy, well managed financial institutions in order to increase the availability of credit to businesses and individuals. The remainder of the increase in capital was due to the net retention of earnings after repurchasing stock and paying one common dividend in 2008. Overall, the Company has a strong capital position and isbe considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes with a risk based capital ratio of 16.54% and an asset leverage ratio of 12.15%11.20% at December 31, 2008 compared to 9.74% at December 31, 2007.2010. The Company’s book value per common share at December 31, 2008 was $4.39 and$4.07, its tangible book value per common share was $3.75.
     LIQUIDITY. . . $3.46, and its tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was 7.94% at December 31, 2010.

LIQUIDITY …The Bank’sCompany’s liquidity position has been strong during the last several years when the Bank was undergoing a turnaround and a return to traditional community banking.years. Our core retail deposit base has remained stable throughout this periodgrown over the past two years and has been more than adequate to fund the Bank’sCompany’s operations. Cash flow from maturities, prepayments and amortization of securities was used to either fund the strong net loan growth that the Company has achieved over the past several years.(2009) or paydown borrowings (2010). We strive to operate our loan to deposit ratio in a range of 85% to 95%. At the end of 2008,December 31, 2010, the Company’s loan to

28


deposit ratio forwas 84.6%. Given further expected net loan paydowns in the first time exceeded 100%, and as a resulthalf of 2011, we plan to focus more aggressively on raising deposits in 2008 to fund future loan growth. We do not expect to increase borrowings above their current level.
more actively purchase mortgage backed investment securities to replace this cash flow.

Liquidity can also be analyzed by utilizing the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Cash and cash equivalents increaseddecreased by $6$7.0 million from December 31, 2007,2009, to December 31, 2008,2010, due to $52$22.1 million of cash used in financing activities. This was partially offset by $12.4 million of cash provided by financinginvesting activities and $6$2.7 million of cash provided by operating activities. This was partially offset by $52 million of cash used in investing activities. Within investing activities, cash provided by investment security maturities and sales exceeded purchases of new investment securities by $22 million. However, the net use of cash in investing activities was due to loan growth. Cash advanced for new loan fundings and purchases totaled $209totalled $86.9 million and was $72$42.8 million higherlower than the $137$129.7 million of cash received from loan principal payments and sales. Cash used for new investment security purchases exceeded

maturities and sales by $29.8 million. Within financing activities, the Company experienceddeposits increased by $16.3 million, which was used to help pay down short-term borrowings by $21.2 million.

The holding company had a net $17 million decline in deposits due to reduced certificatestotal of deposit. The Company more than replaced these deposits with short-term FHLB borrowings and advances, which we chose to increase by $52 million due to more attractive funding costs. The CPP preferred stock issuance also provided the Company with $21$16.7 million of cash, from financing activities.

     The parent company had $23 million of cashshort-term investments, and short-term investmentssecurities at December 31, 2008 compared2010, which was down $3.2 million from the year-end 2009 total. We have elected to $4retain $14 million of the total $21 million in funds received from the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with our participation in TARP’s Capital Purchase Program (CPP) at December 31, 2007. Dividendthe holding company to provide us with greater liquidity and financial flexibility. ($7 million of the CPP funds were downstreamed to our subsidiary Bank over the past two years to help the Bank maintain compliance with our own internal capital guidelines.) Additionally, dividend payments from our subsidiaries and the settlement of the inter-company tax positioncan also provide ongoing cash to the parent. As ofholding company. At December 31, 2008,2010, however, the subsidiary bank had $3.9 million ofBank did not have any cash available for dividend upstream perimmediate dividends to the holding company under the applicable regulatory formulas.
formulas because of the loss it incurred in 2009. We presently expect that the Bank will return to dividend paying capacity sometime in the second half of 2011. As such, the holding company will continue to use its ample supply of cash and short-term investments to meet its trust preferred debt service requirements and preferred stock dividends, which approximate $2.1 million annually.

Financial institutions must maintain liquidity to meet day-to-day requirements of depositors and borrowers, take advantage of market opportunities, and provide a cushion against unforeseen needs. Liquidity needs can be met by either reducing assets or increasing liabilities. Sources of asset liquidity are provided by short-term investment securities, time deposits with banks, federal funds sold, and short-term investments in money market funds, banker’s acceptances, and commercial paper.funds. These assets totaled $42$29 million at December 31, 20082010 and $8$33 million at December 31, 2007.2009. Maturing and repaying loans, as well as the monthly cash flow associated with mortgage-backed securities and security maturities are other significant sources of asset liquidity for the Company.

Liability liquidity can be met by attracting deposits with competitive rates, using repurchase agreements, buying federal funds, or utilizing the facilities of the Federal Reserve or the Federal Home Loan Bank systems. The Company utilizes a variety of these methods of liability liquidity. Additionally, the Company’s subsidiary bankBank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank, which provides the opportunity to obtain short- to longer-term advances based upon the Bank’sCompany’s investment in assets secured by one- to four-family residential real estate. At December 31, 2008,2010, the bankCompany had immediately available $183$244 million of overnight borrowing availability at the FHLB, $36 million of short-term borrowing availability at the Federal Reserve Bank and $10$23 million of unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks. The Company believes it has ample liquidity available to fund outstanding loan commitments if they were fully drawn upon.

CAPITAL RESOURCES. . .RESOURCES … The Company meaningfully exceeds all regulatory capital ratios for each of the periods presented and is considered well capitalized. The asset leverage ratio was 12.15% and11.20%, the Tier 1 capital ratio was 14.66%15.27%, and the risk based capital ratio was 16.54% at December 31, 2008 compared to 9.74% and 12.79% at December 31, 2007. The2010. Note that the impact of other comprehensive loss is excluded from the regulatory capital ratios. At December 31, 2008,2010, accumulated other comprehensive loss amounted to $4.2$4.9 million. The Company’s tangible equity to assets ratio was 8.90%10.05% and its tangible common equity to assets ratio was 8.30%7.94% at December 31, 2008.2010. We anticipate that our strong capital ratios maywill increase further increase in 20092011 due to the retention of all earnings, thatwhich will be partially offset by preferred dividend requirements and growth of thelimited balance sheet.

     In January 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a repurchase program to buyback up to 5% or approximately 1.1 million of its outstanding common shares. The Company completed this program in 2008 by repurchasing 1,098,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $2.58. The Company also used $544,000 of cash to pay a 2.5 cent common dividend to its shareholders in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of oursheet growth.

Our decision to accept the $21 million CPP preferred stock investment in December 2008 did strengthen our capital ratios. However as a result of this decision, for a period of three years we are no longer permitted to repurchase stock or declare and pay common dividends without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.

The Company presently does not expect to repay any portion of the CPP preferred stock investment prior to 2012 given the slowness of the economic recovery and the need for the Bank to achieve sustained profitability.

INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY. . .SENSITIVITY … Asset/liability management involves managing the risks associated with changing interest rates and the resulting impact on the Company’s net interest income, net income and capital. The management and measurement of interest rate risk at AmeriServ Financialthe Company is performed by using the following tools: 1) simulation modeling, which analyzes the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income, net income and capital levels over specific future time periods. The simulation modeling forecasts earnings under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, prepayments and changes in the volumes and rates of various loan and deposit categories. The simulation modeling incorporates assumptions about reinvestment and the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities without stated contractual maturities; 2) market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis, and 3) static GAP analysis, which analyzes the extent to which interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities are matched at specific points in time. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by senior management and the Company’s Board of Directors on an ongoing basis.

29


The following table presents a summary of the Company’s static GAP positions at December 31, 2008:
                     
      OVER  OVER       
      3 MONTHS  6 MONTHS       
  3 MONTHS  THROUGH  THROUGH  OVER    
  OR LESS  6 MONTHS  1 YEAR  1 YEAR  TOTAL 
INTEREST SENSITIVITY PERIOD (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PERCENTAGES) 
RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS:                    
Loans and loans held for sale $225,644  $55,561  $93,070  $323,923  $698,198 
Investment securities  12,207   23,238   34,638   72,592   142,675 
Short-term assets  17,179            17,179 
Regulatory stock  7,614         2,125   9,739 
Bank owned life insurance        32,929      32,929 
                
Total rate sensitive assets $262,644  $78,799  $160,637  $398,640  $900,720 
                
RATE SENSITIVE LIABILITIES:                    
Deposits:                    
Non-interest bearing deposits $  $  $  $116,372  $116,372 
NOW  4,379         56,521   60,900 
Money market  116,667         13,025   129,692 
Other savings  17,670         53,012   70,682 
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more  11,813   13,382   3,565   7,406   36,166 
Other time deposits  104,374   25,239   35,546   115,985   281,144 
                
Total deposits  254,903   38,621   39,111   362,321   694,956 
Borrowings  119,932   12   3,029   23,890   146,863 
                
Total rate sensitive liabilities $374,835  $38,633  $42,140  $386,211  $841,819 
                
INTEREST SENSITIVITY GAP:                    
Interval  (112,191)  40,166   118,497   12,429    
Cumulative $(112,191) $(72,025) $46,472  $58,901  $58,901 
                
Period GAP ratio  0.70X  2.04X  3.81X  1.03X    
Cumulative GAP ratio  0.70   0.83   1.10   1.07     
Ratio of cumulative GAP to total assets  (11.60)%  (7.45)%  4.81%  6.09%    
2010:

INTEREST SENSITIVITY PERIOD

  3 MONTHS
OR LESS
  OVER
3 MONTHS
THROUGH
6 MONTHS
  OVER
6 MONTHS
THROUGH
1 YEAR
  OVER
1 YEAR
  TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PERCENTAGES) 

RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS:

      

Loans and loans held for sale

  $202,515   $52,899   $86,290   $316,712   $658,416  

Investment securities

   18,276    9,075    15,364    129,920    172,635  

Short-term assets

   5,177                5,177  

Regulatory stock

   7,233            2,125    9,358  

Bank owned life insurance

           34,466        34,466  
                     

Total rate sensitive assets

  $233,201   $61,974   $136,120   $448,757   $880,052  
                     

RATE SENSITIVE LIABILITIES:

      

Deposits:

      

Non-interest bearing deposits

  $   $   $   $127,870   $127,870  

NOW

   4,442            54,764    59,206  

Money market

   150,631            22,603    173,234  

Other savings

   19,190            57,572    76,762  

Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more

   12,796    21,695    5,321    10,996    50,808  

Other time deposits

   87,089    27,543    47,069    151,635    313,336  
                     

Total deposits

   274,148    49,238    52,390    425,440    801,216  

Borrowings

   4,565    15    29    22,776    27,385  
                     

Total rate sensitive liabilities

  $278,713   $49,253   $52,419   $448,216   $828,601  
                     

INTEREST SENSITIVITY GAP:

      

Interval

   (45,512  12,721    83,701    541      

Cumulative

  $(45,512 $(32,791 $50,910   $51,451   $51,451  
                     

Period GAP ratio

   0.84  1.26  2.60  1.00 

Cumulative GAP ratio

   0.84    0.90    1.13    1.06   

Ratio of cumulative GAP to total assets

   (4.80)%   (3.46)%   5.36  5.42 

When December 31, 2008,2010, is compared to December 31, 2007,2009, there has been limited change in the ratio of theCompany’s modestly positive cumulative GAP to total assetsratio through one year became more positive due to an anticipated increase in asset prepayment speeds.year. While the Company does have a negative gapGAP position through six months, the absolute low level of rates makes this table more difficult to analyze since there is little room for certain liabilities to reprice downward further.

Management places primary emphasis on simulation modeling to manage and measure interest rate risk. The Company’s asset/liability management policy seeks to limit net interest income variability over the first twelve months of the forecast period to +/-7.5%, which include interest rate movements of 200 basis points. Additionally, the Company also uses market value sensitivity measures to further evaluate the balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. The Company monitors the trends in market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents an analysis of the sensitivity inherent in the Company’s net interest income and market value of portfolio equity. The interest rate scenarios in the table compare the Company’s base forecast, which was prepared using a flat interest rate scenario, to scenarios that reflect immediate interest rate changes of 100 and 200 basis points. Note that we suspended the 200 basis point downward rate shock since it has little value due to the absolute low level of interest rates. Each rate scenario contains unique prepayment and repricing assumptions that are applied to the Company’s existing balance sheet that was developed under the flat interest rate scenario.

         
  VARIABILITY OF CHANGE IN
  NET INTEREST MARKET VALUE OF
INTEREST RATE SCENARIO INCOME PORTFOLIO EQUITY
200 bp increase  (0.7)%  6.6%
100 bp increase  1.7   6.2 
100 bp decrease  (9.6)  (14.9)

INTEREST RATE SCENARIO

  VARIABILITY OF
NET INTEREST
INCOME
  CHANGE IN
MARKET VALUE OF
PORTFOLIO EQUITY
 

200 bp increase

   2.1  2.9

100 bp increase

   2.4    3.8  

100 bp decrease

   (7.4  (12.0

The variability of net interest income is negative in the 100 basis point downward rate scenario as the Company has more exposure to assets repricing downward to a greater extent than liabilities due to the absolute low level of interest rates with the fed funds rate currently at 0.25%. There is only limitedThe variability of net interest income variabilityis positive in the increasingupward rate shocks as the Company has better diversified its loan portfolio with the interest rate scenarios.on more loans now tied to LIBOR. Also, the Company expects that it will not have to reprice its core deposit accounts up as quickly when interest rates rise. The market value of portfolio equity increases in the upward rate shocks due to the improved value of the Company’s core deposit base. Negative variability of market value of portfolio equity occurredoccurs in the downward rate shock due to a reduced value for core deposits.

30


Within the investment portfolio at December 31, 2008, 89%2010, 95% of the portfolio is classified as available for sale and 11%5% as held to maturity. The available for sale classification provides management with greater flexibility to manage the securities portfolio to better achieve overall balance sheet rate sensitivity goals and provide liquidity to fund loan growth if needed. The mark to market of the available for sale securities does inject more volatility in the book value of equity, but has no impact on regulatory capital. There are 2127 securities that are temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.2010. The Company reviews its securities quarterly and has asserted that at December 31, 2008,2010, the impaired value of securities represents temporary declines due to movements in interest rates and the Company does have the ability and intent to hold those securities to maturity or to allow a market recovery. Furthermore, it is the Company’s intent to manage its long-term interest rate risk by continuing to sell newly originated fixed-rate 30-year mortgage loans into the secondary market. The Company also periodically sells 15-year fixed ratefixed-rate mortgage loans into the secondary market as well.well, depending on market conditions. For the year 2008, 65%2010, 68% of all residential mortgage loan production was sold into the secondary market.

The amount of loans outstanding by category as of December 31, 2008,2010, which are due in (i) one year or less, (ii) more than one year through five years, and (iii) over five years, are shown in the following table. Loan balances are also categorized according to their sensitivity to changes in interest rates.

                 
      MORE       
      THAN ONE       
  ONE  YEAR       
  YEAR OR  THROUGH  OVER FIVE  TOTAL 
  LESS  FIVE YEARS  YEARS  LOANS 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS) 
Commercial $30,654  $66,319  $13,224  $110,197 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  39,622   132,074   182,174   353,870 
Real estate-mortgage  54,201   77,716   88,011   219,928 
Consumer  8,133   2,143   13,528   23,804 
             
Total $132,610  $278,252  $296,937  $707,799 
             
                 
Loans with fixed-rate $71,304  $148,603  $140,388  $360,295 
Loans with floating-rate  61,306   129,649   156,549   347,504 
             
Total $132,610  $278,252  $296,937  $707,799 
             
   
Percent composition of maturity  18.7%  39.3%  42.0%  100.0%
Fixed-rate loans as a percentage of total loans              50.9%
Floating-rate loans as a percentage of total loans              49.1%

   ONE
YEAR OR
LESS
  MORE
THAN ONE
YEAR
THROUGH
FIVE YEARS
  OVER FIVE
YEARS
  TOTAL
LOANS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS) 

Commercial

  $25,974   $42,570   $9,778   $78,322  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   50,585    175,024    144,766    370,375  

Real estate-mortgage

   61,058    79,725    69,945    210,728  

Consumer

   4,383    9,345    5,505    19,233  
                 

Total

  $142,000   $306,664   $229,994   $678,658  
                 

Loans with fixed-rate

  $86,442   $174,361   $101,617   $362,420  

Loans with floating-rate

   55,558    132,303    128,377    316,238  
                 

Total

  $142,000   $306,664   $229,994   $678,658  
                 

Percent composition of maturity

   20.9  45.2  33.9  100.0

Fixed-rate loans as a percentage of total loans

      53.4

Floating-rate loans as a percentage of total loans

      46.6

The loan maturity information is based upon original loan terms and is not adjusted for principal paydowns and rollovers. In the ordinary course of business, loans maturing within one year may be renewed, in whole or in part, as to principal amount at interest rates prevailing at the date of renewal.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS. . .TheOBLIGATIONS … The following table presents, as of December 31, 2008,2010, significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.

                         
  PAYMENTS DUE IN
  NOTE ONE YEAR ONE TO THREE THREE TO FIVE OVER FIVE  
  REFERENCE OR LESS YEARS YEARS YEARS TOTAL
  (IN THOUSANDS)
Deposits without a stated maturity  8  $377,646  $  $  $  $377,646 
Certificates of deposit*  8   200,784   86,957   30,823   24,255   342,819 
Borrowed funds*  10   125,420   11,190   147   692   137,449 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures*  10            32,158   32,158 
Pension obligation  13   1,500            1,500 
Lease commitments  14   613   945   428   391   2,377 

  PAYMENTS DUE IN 
  NOTE
REFERENCE
  ONE YEAR
OR LESS
  ONE TO  THREE
YEARS
  THREE TO  FIVE
YEARS
  OVER FIVE
YEARS
  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 

Deposits without a stated maturity

  8   $437,072   $   $   $   $437,072  

Certificates of deposit*

  8    206,430    117,568    22,979    39,443    386,420  

Borrowed funds*

  10    4,641    9,673    186    589    15,089  

Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures*

  10                29,947    29,947  

Pension obligation

  14    1,500                1,500  

Lease commitments

  15    959    1,337    948    2,704    5,948  

*Includes interest based upon interest rates in effect at December 31, 2008.2010. Future changes in market interest rates could materially affect contractual amounts to be paid.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS. . . ARRANGEMENTS …The BankCompany incurs off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These risks derive from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments and standby letters of credit involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts. The Bank

Company uses the same

31


credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending. The Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating $112,192,000$84.9 million and standby letters of credit of $13,064,000$11.5 million as of December 31, 2008.2010. The Company can also use various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. As of December 31, 2008,2010, the Company had $18 million in interest rate swaps outstanding.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES. . .ESTIMATES … The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Accounting and reporting policies for the allowance for loan losses, goodwill, and core deposit intangibles and income taxes, and investment securities are deemed critical because they involve the use of estimates and require significant management judgments. Application of assumptions different than those used by the Company could result in material changes in the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

ACCOUNT — Allowance for Loan Losses

BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Allowance for Loan Losses

INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Provision for Loan Losses

DESCRIPTION

The allowance for loan losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining reserve levels believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable credit losses. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the credit portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including, among others, likelihood of customer default, loss given default, exposure at default, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, value of collateral, estimated losses on consumer loans and residential mortgages, and general amounts for historical loss experience. This process also considers economic conditions, uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the various credit portfolios. All of these factors may be susceptible to significant change. Also, the allocation of the allowance for credit losses to specific loan pools is based on historical loss trends and management’s judgment concerning those trends.

Commercial and commercial mortgagereal estate loans are the largest category of credits and the most sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the allowance for loan loss. Approximately $7.3$16.6 million, or 82%84%, of the total allowance for loan losses at December 31, 20082010 has been allottedallocated to these two loan categories. This allocation also considers other relevant factors such as actual versus estimated losses, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provision for credit losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods.

ACCOUNT — Goodwill and core deposit intangibles

BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Goodwill and core deposit intangibles

INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Goodwill impairment and amortization of core deposit intangibles

DESCRIPTION

The Company considers our accounting policies related to goodwill and core deposit intangibles to be critical because the assumptions or judgment used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in past acquisitions are subjective and complex. As a result, changes in these assumptions or judgment could have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

The fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including the resulting goodwill, was based either on quoted market prices or provided by other third party sources, when available. When third party information was not available, estimates were made in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques. The assumptions that were used in the cash flow modeling were subjective and are susceptible to significant changes. The Company routinely utilizes the services of an independent third party that is regarded within the banking industry as an expert in valuing core deposits to monitor the ongoing value and changes in the Company’s core deposit base. These core deposit valuation updates are based upon specific data provided from statistical analysis of the bank’sCompany’s own deposit behavior to estimate the duration of these non-maturity deposits combined with market interest rates and other economic factors.

32


Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value attributable to unidentifiable intangible elements in the business acquired. The Company’s goodwill relates to value inherent in the banking businessand wealth management businesses, and the value is dependent upon the Company’s ability to provide quality, cost-effective services in the face of free competition from other market participants on a regional basis. This ability relies upon continuing investments in processing systems, the development of value-added service features and the ease of use of the Company’s services. As such, goodwill value is supported ultimately by revenue that is driven by the volume of business transacted and the loyalty of the Company’s deposit and customer base over a longer time frame. The quality and value of a Company’s assets is also an important factor to consider when performing goodwill impairment testing. A decline in earnings as a result of a lack of growth or the inability to deliver cost-effective value added services over sustained periods can lead to impairment of goodwill.

Goodwill which has an indefinite useful life is tested for impairment at least annually and written down and charged to results of operations only in periods in which the recorded value is more than the estimated fair value. The Company’s testing in 20082010 indicated that its goodwill was not impaired. However, during the third quarter of 2009, the Company did reduce the goodwill allocated to West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA) by $547,000. This reduction resulted from a purchase price adjustment as the principals of WCCA did not fully earn a deferred contingent payment that had been accrued as a liability of the Company at the time of acquisition.

Core deposit intangibles that have a finite life will continue to beare amortized over their useful life and are also regularly evaluated for impairment.

life. As of December 31, 2008, goodwill and2010, all core deposit intangibles werefor the Company had been fully amortized.

As of December 31, 2010, goodwill was not considered impaired; however, deteriorating economic conditions could result in impairment, which could adversely affect earnings in future periods.

ACCOUNT — Income Taxes

BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Deferred Tax Asset and Current Taxes Payable

INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Provision for Income Taxes

DESCRIPTION

     In accordance with the liability method of accounting for income taxes specified in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” the

The provision for income taxes is the sum of income taxes both currently payable and deferred. The changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the changes in differences between the basis of assetassets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that management estimates will be in effect when the differences reverse.

In relation to recording the provision for income taxes, management must estimate the future tax rates applicable to the reversal of tax differences, make certain assumptions regarding whether tax differences are permanent or temporary and the related timing of the expected reversal. Also, estimates are made as to whether taxable operating income in future periods will be sufficient to fully recognize any gross deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. Alternatively, we may make estimates about the potential usage of deferred tax assets that decrease our valuation allowances. As of December 31, 2008,2010, we believe that all of the deferred tax assets recorded on our balance sheet will ultimately be recovered and that no valuation allowances were needed.

In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

ACCOUNT — Investment Securities

BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Investment Securities

INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Net realized gains (losses) on investment securities

DESCRIPTION

Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment such as the severity of loss, the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security’s performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security to recovery. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At December 31, 2008, 97%2010, all of the

33


unrealized losses in the available-for-sale security portfolio were comprised of securities issued by Governmentgovernment agencies, the U.S. Treasury or Governmentgovernment sponsored agencies. The Company believes the price movementsunrealized losses are primarily a result of increases in market yields from the time of purchase. In general, as market yields rise, the value of securities will decrease; as market yields fall, the fair value of securities will increase. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary; therefore, these securities are dependent uponhave not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. Management has also concluded that based on current information we expect to continue to receive scheduled interest payments as well as the movemententire principal balance. Furthermore, management does not intend to sell these securities and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before they recover in market interest rates. The Company’s management also maintains the intent and ability to hold securities in an unrealized loss position to the earlier of the recovery of losses or maturity.
value.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. . .

STATEMENTS…

THE STRATEGIC FOCUS:

The challenge for the future is to improve earnings performance to peer levels through a disciplined focus on community banking and improving the profitability of our growing Trust Company. In accordance with our strategic plan, AmeriServ will maintain its focus as a community bank delivering banking and trust services to the best of our ability. This companyCompany will not succumb to the lure of quick fixes and fancy financial gimmicks. We have seen where that path leads, and have marveled at how many knowledgeable people fall victim. It is our plan

to continue to build AmeriServ into a potent banking force in this region and in this industry. Our focus encompasses the following:

Customer Service — it is the existing and prospective customer that AmeriServ must satisfy. This means good products and fair prices. But it also means quick response time and professional competence. It means speedy problem resolution and a minimizing of bureaucratic frustrations. AmeriServ is training and motivating its staff to meet these standards.

Revenue Growth — It is necessary for AmeriServ to focus on growing revenues. This means loan growth, deposit growth and fee growth. It also means close coordination between all customer service areas so as many revenue producing products as possible can be presented to existing and prospective customers. The Company’s Strategic Plan contains action plans in each of these areas. This challenge will be met by seeking to exceed customer expectations in every area. An examination of the peer bank database provides ample proof that a well executed community banking business model can generate a reliable and rewarding revenue stream.

Expense Rationalization — a quick review of recent AmeriServ financial statements tells the story of a continuing process ofFinancial remains focused on trying to rationalize expenses. This has not been a program of broad based cuts, but has been targeted so AmeriServ stays strong but spends less. However, this initiative takes on new importance because it is critical to be certain that future expenditures are directed to areas that are playing a positive role in the drive to improve revenues.

     Each of the preceding charges has become the focus at AmeriServ, particularly in the three major customer service, revenue generating areas.
1.THE RETAIL BANK — this business unit had a successful 2008 and is eager to continue to grow. It has a solid array of banking services that includes deposit gathering, consumer lending and residential mortgages. With its broad distribution of community offices in its primary market, this business unit provides a solid foundation for the company to grow from.
2.COMMERCIAL LENDING — this business unit is already in a growth mode. It has totally revised procedures and has recruited an experienced professional staff. But it also has the skills and energy to provide financial advice and counsel. The challenge is to shorten response time, to eliminate bureaucracy and to always understand the needs of the customer. This business unit has already proven its value with record loan production in each of the past two years. The challenge is to maintain this momentum and to continue working to maximize its potential.
3.TRUST COMPANY — the Trust Company has already proven its ability to grow its assets under management along with its fees. It has restructured itself into a true 21st Century business model which has improved its marketplace focus. It has a positive investment performance record which enables it to excel in traditional trust functions such as wealth management. But also, it has shown creativity in building a position of substance in the vast world of union managed pension funds. Resources will continue to be channeled to the Trust Company so that this kind of creativity can continue to lead to new opportunities. Also, synergies need to be developed between the Trust Company and West Chester Capital Advisors so that revenue growth can be further enhanced.

This Form 10-K contains various forward-looking statements and includes assumptions concerning the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates, intentions, operations, future results, and prospects, including statements that include the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and are subject to risk and uncertainties. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary statement identifying important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control) which could cause

34


the actual results or events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions.

Such factors include the following: (i) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions; (ii) the effects of trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (iii) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (iv) inflation, stock and bond market, and monetary fluctuations; (v) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer, and other lending activities; (vi) changes in federal and state banking and financial services laws and regulations; (vii) the presence in the Company’s market area of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company; (viii) the timely development of competitive new products and services by the Company and the acceptance of those products and services by customers and regulators (when required); (ix) the willingness of customers to substitute competitors’ products and services for those of the Company and vice versa; (x) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; (xi) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and (xii) other external developments which could materially impact the Company’s operational and financial performance.

The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive, and neither such list nor any forward-looking statement takes into account the impact that any future acquisition may have on the Company and on any such forward-looking statement.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Risk identification and management are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various types of risk, including interest rate, credit, and liquidity risk. The Company controls and monitors these risks with policies, procedures, and various levels of managerial and Board oversight. The Company’s objective is to optimize profitability while managing and controlling risk within Board approved policy limits.

Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of net interest income and the market value of financial instruments to the magnitude, direction, and frequency of changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk results from various repricing frequencies and the maturity structure of assets, liabilities, and hedges. The Company uses its asset liability management policy and hedging policy to control and manage interest rate risk.

For information regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the Company’s net interest income and market value of its investment portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Interest Rate Sensitivity.”

Liquidity risk represents the inability to generate cash or otherwise obtain funds at reasonable rates to satisfy commitments to borrowers, as well as, the obligations to depositors, debtholders and debtholders.to fund operating expenses. The Company uses its asset liability management policy and contingency funding plan to control and manage liquidity risk.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity.”

Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk results from extending credit to customers, purchasing securities, and entering into certain off-balance sheet loan funding commitments. The Company’s primary credit risk occurs in the loan portfolio. The Company uses its credit policy and disciplined approach to evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to control and manage credit risk. The Company’s investment policy and hedging policy strictly limit the amount of credit risk that may be assumed in the investment portfolio and through hedging activities.

For information regarding the market risk of the Company’s financial instruments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Interest Rate Sensitivity in the MD&A presented on pages 30-32.Sensitivity.” The Company’s principal market risk exposure is to interest rates.

35


ITEM 8.CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
ASSETS        
Cash and due from depository institutions $17,945  $24,715 
Interest bearing deposits  1,601   197 
Short-term investments in money market funds  15,578   4,359 
       
Cash and cash equivalents  35,124   29,271 
       
Investment securities:        
Available for sale  126,781   140,582 
Held to maturity (market value $16,323 at December 31, 2008 and $18,378 at December 31, 2007)  15,894   18,533 
Loans held for sale  1,000   1,060 
Loans  706,799   635,566 
Less: Unearned income  691   471 
     Allowance for loan losses  8,910   7,252 
       
Net loans  697,198   627,843 
       
         
Premises and equipment, net  9,521   8,450 
Accrued income receivable  3,735   4,032 
Goodwill  13,497   13,497 
Core deposit intangibles  108   973 
Bank owned life insurance  32,929   32,864 
Net deferred tax asset  12,651   13,750 
Regulatory stock  9,739   7,204 
Other assets  8,752   6,819 
       
TOTAL ASSETS $966,929  $904,878 
       
         
LIABILITIES        
Non-interest bearing deposits $116,372  $113,380 
Interest bearing deposits  578,584   597,059 
       
Total deposits  694,956   710,439 
       
         
Short-term borrowings  119,920   72,210 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  13,858   9,905 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  13,085   13,085 
       
Total borrowed funds  146,863   95,200 
       
         
Other liabilities  11,858   8,945 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES  853,677   814,584 
       
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; there were 21,000 shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2008, and no shares issued or outstanding on December 31, 2007  20,447    
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 26,317,450 shares issued and 21,128,831 shares outstanding on December 31, 2008; 26,279,916 shares issued and 22,188,997 shares outstanding on December 31, 2007  65,794   65,700 
Treasury stock at cost, 5,188,619 shares on December 31, 2008 and 4,090,919 shares on December 31, 2007  (68,659)  (65,824)
Capital surplus  79,353   78,788 
Retained earnings  20,533   15,602 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net  (4,216)  (3,972)
       
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  113,252   90,294 
       
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $966,929  $904,878 
       

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

ASSETS

   

Cash and due from depository institutions

  $14,160   $20,835  

Interest bearing deposits

   1,716    1,707  

Short-term investments in money market funds

   3,461    3,766  
         

Cash and cash equivalents

   19,337    26,308  
         

Investment securities:

   

Available for sale

   164,811    131,272  

Held to maturity (market value $8,267 at December 31, 2010 and $11,996 at December 31, 2009)

   7,824    11,611  

Loans held for sale

   7,405    3,790  

Loans

   671,253    719,785  

Less: Unearned income

   477    671  

Allowance for loan losses

   19,765    19,685  
         

Net loans

   651,011    699,429  
         

Premises and equipment, net

   10,485    9,229  

Accrued income receivable

   3,210    3,589  

Goodwill

   12,950    12,950  

Bank owned life insurance

   34,466    33,690  

Net deferred tax asset

   16,058    15,925  

Regulatory stock

   9,358    9,739  

Prepaid federal deposit insurance

   3,073    4,538  

Other assets

   8,986    7,956  
         

TOTAL ASSETS

  $948,974   $970,026  
         

LIABILITIES

   

Non-interest bearing deposits

  $127,870   $118,232  

Interest bearing deposits

   673,346    667,779  
         

Total deposits

   801,216    786,011  
         

Short-term borrowings

   4,550    25,775  

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

   9,750    25,804  

Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures

   13,085    13,085  
         

Total borrowed funds

   27,385    64,664  
         

Other liabilities

   13,315    12,097  
         

TOTAL LIABILITIES

   841,916    862,772  
         

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

Preferred stock, no par value; $1,000 per share liquidation preference; 2,000,000 shares authorized; there were 21,000 shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2010 and 2009

   20,669    20,558  

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized: 26,396,289 shares issued and 21,207,670 shares outstanding on December 31, 2010; par value $2.50 per share; 26,410,528 shares issued and 21,221,909 shares outstanding on December 31, 2009

   264    264  

Treasury stock at cost, 5,188,619 shares on December 31, 2010 and 2009

   (68,659  (68,659

Capital surplus

   145,045    144,984  

Retained earnings

   14,601    14,480  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net

   (4,862  (4,373
         

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   107,058    107,254  
         

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $948,974   $970,026  
         

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

36


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS, 
  EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
INTEREST INCOME            
Interest and fees on loans:            
Taxable $40,817  $41,345  $37,366 
Tax exempt  200   218   231 
Deposits with banks  13   20   23 
Short-term investments in money market funds  140   203   188 
Federal funds sold  4   121   3 
Investment securities:            
Available for sale  5,770   6,433   7,680 
Held to maturity  875   1,039   1,074 
          
Total Interest Income  47,819   49,379   46,565 
          
             
INTEREST EXPENSE            
Deposits  15,680   22,811   19,232 
Short-term borrowings  1,403   972   1,672 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank   499    253   63 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  1,120   1,120   1,120 
          
Total Interest Expense  18,702   25,156   22,087 
          
             
Net Interest Income  29,117   24,223   24,478 
Provision for loan losses  2,925    300   (125)
          
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses  26,192   23,923   24,603 
          
             
NON-INTEREST INCOME            
Trust fees  6,731   6,753   6,519 
Net gains on loans held for sale  477   307   105 
Net realized losses on investment securities  (95)      
Service charges on deposit accounts  3,069   2,579   2,561 
Investment advisory fees  779   974    
Bank owned life insurance  2,695   1,268   1,207 
Other income  2,768   2,826   2,449 
          
Total Non-Interest Income  16,424   14,707   12,841 
          
             
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE            
Salaries and employee benefits  19,217   19,339   18,669 
Net occupancy expense  2,561   2,494   2,410 
Equipment expense  1,677   2,045   2,349 
Professional fees  3,582   3,197   3,208 
Supplies, postage, and freight  1,252   1,211   1,167 
Miscellaneous taxes and insurance  1,395   1,436   1,567 
FDIC deposit insurance expense  113   88   192 
Amortization of core deposit intangibles  865   865   865 
Federal Home Loan Bank prepayment penalties  91       
Other expense  4,884   3,997   4,265 
          
Total Non-Interest Expense  35,637   34,672   34,692 
          
             
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES  6,979   3,958   2,752 
Provision for income taxes  1,470   924   420 
          
NET INCOME $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
          
             
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:            
Basic:            
Net income $0.25  $0.14  $0.11 
Average number of shares outstanding  21,833   22,171   22,141 
Diluted:            
Net income $0.25  $0.14  $0.11 
Average number of shares outstanding  21,975   22,173   22,149 
Cash dividends declared $0.025  $0.00  $0.00 

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS, 
   EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 

INTEREST INCOME

     

Interest and fees on loans:

     

Taxable

  $39,020    $41,359   $40,817  

Tax exempt

   76     91    200  

Interest bearing deposits with banks

   1     4    13  

Short-term investments in money market funds

   16     30    140  

Federal funds sold

   4     1    4  

Investment securities:

     

Available for sale

   5,281     5,340    5,770  

Held to maturity

   433     630    875  
              

Total Interest Income

   44,831     47,455    47,819  
              

INTEREST EXPENSE

     

Deposits

   10,945     13,109    15,680  

Federal funds purchased

        7    1  

Short-term borrowings

   22     133    1,402  

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

   402     652    499  

Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures

   1,120     1,120    1,120  
              

Total Interest Expense

   12,489     15,021    18,702  
              

Net Interest Income

   32,342     32,434    29,117  

Provision for loan losses

   5,250     15,150    2,925  
              

Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses

   27,092     17,284    26,192  
              

NON-INTEREST INCOME

     

Trust fees

   5,571     5,648    6,731  

Net gains on loans held for sale

   958     651    477  

Net realized gains (losses) on investment securities

   157     164    (95

Service charges on deposit accounts

   2,284     2,769    3,069  

Investment advisory fees

   713     648    779  

Bank owned life insurance

   1,227     1,208    2,695  

Other income

   3,057     2,840    2,768  
              

Total Non-Interest Income

   13,967     13,928    16,424  
              

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

     

Salaries and employee benefits

   21,602     20,526    19,217  

Net occupancy expense

   2,691     2,632    2,561  

Equipment expense

   1,680     1,692    1,677  

Professional fees

   4,363     4,032    3,582  

Supplies, postage, and freight

   997     1,117    1,252  

Miscellaneous taxes and insurance

   1,396     1,374    1,395  

Federal deposit insurance expense

   1,575     1,670    113  

Amortization of core deposit intangibles

        108    865  

Federal Home Loan Bank prepayment penalties

            91  

Other expense

   5,393     6,006    4,884  
              

Total Non-Interest Expense

   39,697     39,157    35,637  
              

PRETAX INCOME (LOSS)

   1,362     (7,945  6,979  

Provision for income taxes (benefit)

   80     (3,050  1,470  
              

NET INCOME (LOSS)

   1,282     (4,895  5,509  

Preferred stock dividends and accretion of preferred stock discount

   1,161     1,158    35  
              

NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

  $121    $(6,053 $5,474  
              

(continued on next page)

AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
       2010           2009          2008     
   (IN THOUSANDS, 
   EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 

PER COMMON SHARE DATA:

     

Basic:

     

Net income (loss)

  $0.01    $(0.29 $0.25  

Average number of shares outstanding

   21,224     21,172    21,833  

Diluted:

     

Net income (loss)

  $0.01    $(0.29 $0.25  

Average number of shares outstanding

   21,226     21,174    21,975  

Cash dividends declared

  $0.00    $0.00   $0.025  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

37


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME            
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
             
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:            
Pension obligation change for defined benefit plan  (3,745)  21    
Income tax effect  1,273   (7)   
Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities arising during period  3,471   3,683   1,309 
Income tax effect  (1,180)  (1,252)  (444)
Reclassification adjustment for losses on available for sale securities included in net income  (95)      
Income tax effect  32       
          
Other comprehensive income (loss)  (244)  2,445   865 
          
             
Comprehensive income $5,265  $5,479  $3,197 
          
(LOSS)

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

    

Net income (loss)

  $1,282   $(4,895 $5,509  

Other comprehensive loss, before tax:

    

Pension obligation change for defined benefit plan

   (1,031  (1,093  (3,745

Income tax effect

   352    372    1,273  

Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities arising during period

   446    1,018    3,280  

Income tax effect

   (152  (346  (1,115

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on available for sale securities included in net income (loss)

   (157  (164  95  

Income tax effect

   53    56    (32
             

Other comprehensive loss

   (489  (157  (244
             

Comprehensive income (loss)

  $793   $(5,052 $5,265  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

38


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
PREFERRED STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period $  $  $ 
New shares issued (21,000 shares)  20,447       
          
Balance at end of period  20,447       
          
             
COMMON STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period  65,700   65,618   65,508 
New shares issued (37,534 shares)  94   82   110 
          
Balance at end of period  65,794   65,700   65,618 
          
             
TREASURY STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period  (65,824)  (65,824)  (65,824)
Treasury stock, purchased at cost (1,097,700 shares)  (2,835)      
          
Balance at end of period  (68,659)  (65,824)  (65,824)
          
             
CAPITAL SURPLUS            
Balance at beginning of period  78,788   78,739   78,620 
New common shares issued (37,534 shares)  5   37   64 
Stock option expense  7   12   55 
Common stock warrant issued (1,312,500 shares)  553       
          
Balance at end of period  79,353   78,788   78,739 
          
             
RETAINED EARNINGS            
Balance at beginning of period  15,602   12,568   10,236 
Net income  5,509   3,034   2,332 
Cash dividend declared on preferred stock  (35)      
Cash dividend declared on common stock of $0.025 on 21,771,237 shares  (543)      
          
Balance at end of period  20,533   15,602   12,568 
          
             
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS            
Balance at beginning of period  (3,972)  (6,417)  (4,066)
Cumulative effect of adoption of change in accounting for pension obligation, net of tax effect        (3,216)
Other comprehensive income  (244)  2,445   865 
          
Balance at end of period  (4,216)  (3,972)  (6,417)
          
   
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $113,252  $90,294  $84,684 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

PREFERRED STOCK

    

Balance at beginning of period

  $20,558   $20,447   $20,447  

Accretion of preferred stock discount

   111    111      
             

Balance at end of period

   20,669    20,558    20,447  
             

COMMON STOCK

    

Balance at beginning of period

   264    65,794    65,700  

New shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan

       51    94  

Change in par value (from $2.50 per share to $0.01 per share)

       (65,582    

Restricted stock

       1      
             

Balance at end of period

   264    264    65,794  
             

TREASURY STOCK

    

Balance at beginning of period

   (68,659  (68,659  (65,824

Treasury stock, purchased at cost (1,097,700 shares)

           (2,835
             

Balance at end of period

   (68,659  (68,659  (68,659
             

CAPITAL SURPLUS

    

Balance at beginning of period

   144,984    79,353    78,788  

New common shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan (2,033 shares)

   3    22    5  

Stock option expense

   18    11    7  

Common stock warrant issued (1,312,500 shares)

           553  

Change in par value (from $2.50 per share to $0.01 per share)

       65,582      

Restricted stock

   40    16      
             

Balance at end of period

   145,045    144,984    79,353  
             

RETAINED EARNINGS

    

Balance at beginning of period

   14,480    20,533    15,602  

Net income (loss)

   1,282    (4,895  5,509  

Accretion of preferred stock discount

   (111  (111    

Cash dividend declared on preferred stock

   (1,050  (1,047  (35

Cash dividend declared on common stock of $0.025 per share

           (543
             

Balance at end of period

   14,601    14,480    20,533  
             

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

    

Balance at beginning of period

   (4,373  (4,216  (3,972

Other comprehensive loss

   (489  (157  (244
             

Balance at end of period

   (4,862  (4,373  (4,216
             

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $107,058   $107,254   $113,252  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

39


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
            
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)
Depreciation and amortization expense  1,533   1,505   1,700 
Amortization expense of core deposit intangibles  865   865   865 
Net amortization of investment securities  193   387   597 
Net realized losses on investment securities — available for sale  95       
Net gain on sale of fixed assets     (248)   
Net realized gains on loans held for sale  (477)  (307)  (105)
Amortization of deferred loan fees  (466)  (518)  (393)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale  (36,923)  (26,720)  (11,714)
Sales of mortgage loans held for sale  37,460   26,325   11,454 
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable  297   133   (40)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable  (899)  530   1,029 
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance  (2,695)  (1,268)  (1,207)
Net decrease in other assets  459   779   59 
Net increase in other liabilities  1,048   3,000   627 
          
Net cash provided by operating activities  8,924   10,333   5,079 
          
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
            
Purchase of investment securities — available for sale  (68,610)  (6,768)  (8,823)
Purchase of investment securities — held to maturity  (4,464)     (1,500)
Purchase of regulatory stock  (8,268)  (5,824)  (3,363)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — available for sale  59,299   41,988   33,098 
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — held to maturity  7,052   2,054   11,104 
Proceeds from sales of investment securities — available for sale  25,941       
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock  5,733   3,975   4,996 
Long-term loans originated  (152,535)  (180,558)  (142,247)
Principal collected on long-term loans  133,043   163,819   112,027 
Loans purchased or participated  (56,182)  (33,762)  (10,004)
Loans sold or participated  3,950   4,500   1,600 
Net decrease (increase) in other short-term loans  90   (332)  (377)
Purchases of premises and equipment  (2,604)  (1,667)  (1,597)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment     522   50 
Proceeds from insurance policies  2,635       
Acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors     2,200    
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (54,920)  (9,853)  (5,036)
          
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
            
Net (decrease) increase in deposit accounts  (16,526)  (31,316)  22,608 
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings  47,710   23,119   (14,093)
Principal borrowings on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  11,000   9,004    
Principal repayments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  (7,047)  (45)  (41)
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture dividends paid  (1,016)  (1,016)  (1,016)
Common stock dividend paid  (543)      
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan and stock options exercised  106   131   173 
Purchases of treasury stock  (2,835)      
Preferred stock issuance  21,000       
          
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  51,849   (123)  7,631 
          
             
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  5,853   357   7,674 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1  29,271   28,914   21,240 
          
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31 $35,124  $29,271  $28,914 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income (loss)

  $1,282   $(4,895 $5,509  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Provision for loan losses

   5,250    15,150    2,925  

Depreciation and amortization expense

   1,496    1,586    1,533  

Amortization expense of core deposit intangibles

       108    865  

Net amortization of investment securities

   467    231    193  

Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities — available for sale

   (157  (164  95  

Net realized gains on loans held for sale

   (958  (651  (477

Amortization of deferred loan fees

   (407  (456  (466

Origination of mortgage loans held for sale

   (71,643  (67,775  (36,923

Sales of mortgage loans held for sale

   68,986    65,636    37,460  

Decrease in accrued interest receivable

   379    146    297  

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

   (595  74    (899

Earnings on bank-owned life insurance

   (1,032  (1,021  (1,038

Deferred income taxes

   (126  (3,274  1,099  

Stock compensation expense

   61    73    106  

Decrease (increase) in prepaid Federal Deposit Insurance

   1,465    (4,538    

Net increase in other assets

   (2,532  (2,922  (3,479

Net increase in other liabilities

   784    1,085    1,048  
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   2,720    (1,607  7,848  
             

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Purchase of investment securities — available for sale

   (97,789  (55,171  (68,610

Purchase of investment securities — held to maturity

   (1,123      (4,464

Purchase of regulatory stock

           (8,268

Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — available for sale

   61,483    46,778    59,299  

Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — held to maturity

   4,914    4,225    7,052  

Proceeds from sales of investment securities — available for sale

   2,742    4,746    25,941  

Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock

   381        5,733  

Long-term loans originated

   (82,922  (132,551  (152,535

Principal collected on long-term loans

   129,655    128,554    133,043  

Loans purchased or participated

   (3,845  (25,343  (56,182

Loans sold or participated

       12,950    3,950  

Net (increase) decrease in other short-term loans

   (134  116    90  

Purchases of premises and equipment

   (2,762  (1,294  (2,604

Sale of equipment

   10          

Sale of other real estate owned

   1,300    2,874    166  

Proceeds from insurance policies

   451    452    2,635  
             

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   12,361    (13,664  (54,754
             

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Net increase (decrease) in deposit accounts

   16,277    89,606    (16,526

Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings

   (21,225  (94,145  47,710  

Principal borrowings on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

   34,000    350,000    11,000  

Principal repayments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

   (50,054  (338,055  (7,047

Common stock dividend paid

           (543

Preferred stock dividend paid

   (1,050  (951    

Purchases of treasury stock

           (2,835

Preferred stock issuance

           21,000  
             

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

   (22,052  6,455    52,759  
             

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (6,971  (8,816  5,853  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1

   26,308    35,124    29,271  
             

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31

  $19,337   $26,308   $35,124  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

40


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AT AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2008, 20072010, 2009 AND 2006

2008

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS:

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company, headquartered in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Through its banking subsidiary the Company operates 18 banking locations in five southwestern Pennsylvania counties. These branches provide a full range of consumer, mortgage, and commercial financial products. The AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company (Trust Company) offers a complete range of trust and financial services and administers assets valued at approximately $1.5$1.4 billion that are not recognized on the Company’s Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008. On March 7, 2007, the Bank completed the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA). WCCA (a subsidiary of the bank) is a registered investment advisor and at December 31, 2008 had $82 million in assets under management.

2010.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AmeriServ Financial Bank (the Bank), Trust Company, and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company (AmeriServ Life). The Bank is a state-chartered full service bank with 18 locations in Pennsylvania. AmeriServ Life is a captive insurance company that engages in underwriting as a reinsurer of credit life and disability insurance.

Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from these estimates and the differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company’s most significant estimate is the allowance for loan losses.

INVESTMENT SECURITIES:

Securities are classified at the time of purchase as investment securities held to maturity if it is management’s intent and the Company has the ability to hold the securities until maturity. These held to maturity securities are carried on the Company’s books at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount which is computed using the level yield method which approximates the effective interest method. Alternatively, securities are classified as available for sale if it is management’s intent at the time of purchase to hold the securities for an indefinite period of time and/or to use the securities as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy. Securities classified as available for sale include securities which may be sold to effectively manage interest rate risk exposure, prepayment risk, and other factors (such as liquidity requirements). These available for sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/depreciation excluded from income and credited/charged to accumulated other comprehensive income/loss within stockholders’ equity on a net of tax basis. Any securities classified as trading assets are reported at fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/depreciation included in income on a net of tax basis. The Company does not engage in trading activity.

Realized gains or losses on securities sold are computed upon the adjusted cost of the specific securities sold. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment such as the severity of loss, the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security’s

performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security to recovery.

The Company believes the unrealized losses are primarily a result of increases in market yields from the time of purchase. In general, as market yields rise, the value of securities will decrease; as market yields fall, the fair value of securities will increase. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary; therefore, these securities have not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. Management has also concluded that based on current information we expect to continue to receive scheduled interest payments as well as the entire principal balance. Furthermore, management does not intend to sell these securities and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before they recover in value.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK:

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and as such, is required to maintain a minimum investment in stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank that varies with the level of advances outstanding with the Federal Home Loan Bank. The stock is bought from and sold to the Federal Home Loan Bank based upon its $100 par value. The stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and as such is classified as restricted stock, carried at cost and evaluated for by management. The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (a) The significance of the decline in net assets of the Federal Home Loan Bank as compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time this situation has persisted (b) Commitments by the Federal Home Loan Bank to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance (c) The impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the Federal Home Loan Bank and (d) The liquidity position of the Federal Home Loan Bank.

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh has incurred losses in the prior two years and has suspended the payment of dividends. The losses are primarily attributable to impairment of private label mortgage backed securities associated with the extreme economic conditions in place over the last two years. Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein. More consideration was given to the long-term prospects for the Federal Home Loan Bank as opposed to the recent stress caused by the difficult economic conditions the world is facing. Management also considered that the Federal Home Loan Bank’s regulatory capital ratios have increased from the prior year, liquidity appears adequate, new shares of FHLB Stock continue to exchange hands at the $100 par value and the Company received a $381,000 partial redemption of its Federal Home Loan Bank stock in the fourth quarter of 2010.

LOANS:

Interest income is recognized using methods which approximate a level yield related to principal amounts outstanding. The BankCompany discontinues the accrual of interest income when loans become 90 days past due in either principal or interest. In addition, if circumstances warrant, the accrual of interest may be discontinued prior to 90 days. Payments received on non-accrual loans are credited to principal until full recovery of principal has been recognized; or the loan has been returned to accrual status. The only exception to this policy is for residential mortgage loans wherein interest income is recognized on a cash basis as payments are received. A non-accrual commercial loan is placed on accrual status after becoming current and remaining current for twelve consecutive payments. Residential mortgage loans are placed on accrual status upon becoming current.

LOAN FEES:

Loan origination and commitment fees, net of associated direct costs, are deferred and amortized into interest and fees on loans over the loan or commitment period. Fee amortization is determined by the effective interest method.

41


LOANS HELD FOR SALE:

Certain newly originated fixed-rate residential mortgage loans are classified as held for sale, because it is management’s intent to sell these residential mortgage loans. The residential mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value.

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of the premises and equipment using the straight-line method with a half-year convention. Useful lives of up to 30 years for buildings and up to 10 years for equipment are utilized. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases or useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Maintenance, repairs, and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures are incurred.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND CHARGE-OFF PROCEDURES:

As a financial institution, which assumes lending and credit risks as a principal element of its business, the Company anticipates that credit losses will be experienced in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the Company consistently applies a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to perform an analysis which is updated on a quarterly basis at the Bank level to determine both the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the necessary provision for loan losses to be charged against earnings. This methodology includes:

Review of all criticized and impaired loans with balances over $250,000 ($100,000 for loans classified as doubtful or worse) to determine if any specific reserve allocations are required on an individual loan basis. The specific reserve allocations established for these criticized and impaired loans is based on careful analysis of the loan’s performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor. For impaired loans the measurement of impairment may be based upon: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; 2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or 3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral dependent loan.

-review of all criticized and impaired loans with balances over $250,000 ($100,000 for loans classified as doubtful or worse) to determine if any specific reserve allocations are required on an individual loan basis. The specific reserve established for these criticized and impaired loans is based on careful analysis of the loan’s performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor. For impaired loans the measurement of impairment may be based upon: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; 2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or 3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral dependent loan.
-The application of formula driven reserve allocations for all commercial and commercial real-estate loans by using a three-year migration analysis of net losses incurred within each risk grade for the entire commercial loan portfolio. The difference between estimated and actual losses is reconciled through the nature of the migration analysis.
-The application of formula driven reserve allocations to consumer and mortgage loans which are based upon historical net charge-off experience for those loan types. The residential mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company’s five-year historical average of actual loan net charge-offs experienced in that category. The same methodology is used to determine the allocation for consumer loans except the allocation is based upon an average of the most recent actual three-year historical net charge-off experience for consumer loans.
-The application of formula driven reserve allocations to all outstanding loans is based upon review of historical losses and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions.
-Management recognizes that there may be events or economic factors that have occurred affecting specific borrowers or segments of borrowers that may not yet be fully reflected in the information that the Company uses for arriving at reserves for a specific loan or portfolio segment. Therefore, the Company believes that there is estimation risk associated with the use of specific and formula driven allowances.

The application of formula driven reserve allocations for all commercial and commercial real-estate loans by using a three-year migration analysis of net losses incurred within each risk grade for the entire commercial loan portfolio. The difference between estimated and actual losses is reconciled through the nature of the migration analysis.

The application of formula driven reserve allocations to consumer and residential mortgage loans which are based upon historical net charge-off experience for those loan types. The residential mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company’s three-year historical average of actual loan net charge-offs experienced in that category. The same methodology is used to determine the allocation for consumer loans except the allocation is based upon an average of the most recent actual three-year historical net charge-off experience for consumer loans.

The application of formula driven reserve allocations to all outstanding loans is based upon review of historical losses and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions.

Management recognizes that there may be events or economic factors that have occurred affecting specific borrowers or segments of borrowers that may not yet be fully reflected in the information that the Company uses for arriving at reserves for a specific loan or portfolio segment. Therefore, the Company believes that there is estimation risk associated with the use of specific and formula driven allowances.

After completion of this process, a formal meeting of the Loan Loss Reserve Committee is held to evaluate the adequacy of the reserve.

When it is determined that the prospects for recovery of the principal of a loan have significantly diminished, the loan is charged against the allowance account; subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. In addition, non-accrual and large delinquent loans are reviewed monthly to determine potential losses.

The Company’s policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $250,000 within a 12-month period. The Company defines classified loans as those loans rated substandard or doubtful. The Company has also identified three pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment. These separate pools are for small business loans $250,000 or less, residential mortgage loans

42


and consumer loans. Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and evaluated for specific impairment if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative economic concerns indicate impairment.

ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT:

The allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated losses related to these unfunded credit facilities. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors for loans outstanding to these same customers and the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit are provided for in the unfunded commitment reserve expense line item within other expense in the consolidated statement of income and a separate reserve is recorded within the liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheet in other liabilities.

TRUST FEES:

Trust fees are recorded on the cash basis which approximates the accrual basis for such income.

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE:

The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain employees. These policies are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in bank owned life insurance within non-interest income.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of core deposit acquisition premiums. Core deposit acquisition premiums, which were developed by specific core deposit life studies, are amortized using the straight-line method over periods not exceeding 10 years. The recoverability of the carrying value of intangible assets is evaluated on an ongoing basis, and permanent declines in value, if any, are charged to expense.

Goodwill

The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.This statement, among other things, requiresusing a two-step process for testing the impairment of goodwill on at least an annual basis. This approach could cause more volatility in the Company’s reported net income because impairment losses, if any, could occur irregularly and in varying amounts. The Company performs an annual impairment analysis of goodwill. Based on the fair value of the reporting unit, estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, noNo impairment of goodwill was recognized in 2008 or 2007.

any of the periods presented.

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Basic earnings per share include only the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the weighted average common shares outstanding and any potentially dilutive common stock equivalent shares in the calculation. Treasury shares are treated as retired for earnings per share purposes. Options and warrant to purchase 1,539,509, 220,892,1,467,142, 1,546,109, and 213,9741,539,509 shares of common stock were outstanding during 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because to do so would be anti-dilutive. Exercise prices of anti-dilutive options and warrant to purchase common stock outstanding were $2.40-$1.73-$6.10, $4.02-$1.77-$6.10, and $4.86-$2.40-$6.216.10 during 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. Dividends on preferred shares are excludeddeducted from net income in the calculation of earnings per common share.

43


STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:
     On January 1, 2006,

The Company uses the Company adopted Statementmodified prospective method for accounting of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #123(R) “Share-Based Payment” using the “modified prospective” method. Under this method, awards that are granted, modified, or vested after December 15, 2005, are measured and accounted for in accordance with FAS #123(R).stock-based compensation. The Company recognized $7,000$18,000, $11,000 and $12,000$7,000 of pretax compensation expense for the year 20082010, 2009 and 2007.2008. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for the grants: risk-free interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.70%3.83%; expected lives of 10 years; expected volatility ranging from 33.28% to 37.22%35.74% and expected dividend yields of 0%.

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:

The Company presents the components of other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). These components are comprised of the change in the pension obligation and the unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities, net of any reclassification adjustments for realized gains and losses.

The following table sets forth the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Pension obligation for defined benefit plan

  $(6,926 $(6,249

Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities

   2,064    1,876  
         

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

  $(4,862 $(4,373
         

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS:

On a consolidated basis, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks,depository institutions, interest bearing deposits, with banks, federal funds sold and short-term investments in money market funds. The Company made $200,000$174,000 in income tax payments in 2008; $138,0002010; $126,000 in 2007;2009; and $169,000$200,000 in 2006.2008. The Company had non-cash transfers to other real estate owned (OREO) in the amounts of $788,000 in 2010; $2,900,000 in 2009; and $1,319,000 in 2008. The Company made total interest payments of $13,084,000 in 2010; $15,963,000 in 2009; and $19,601,000 in 2008; $24,626,000 in 2007; and $21,058,000 in 2006.

2008.

INCOME TAXES:

Deferred tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate. Deferred income tax expenses or credits are based on the changes in the corresponding asset or liability from period to period. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if necessary, by the amounts of such benefits that are not expected to be realized based upon available evidence.

INTEREST RATE CONTRACTS:

The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (as amended).” The company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. Changes in fair value of derivatives designated and accounted as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in “Other Comprehensive Income,” net of deferred taxes and are subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any hedge ineffectiveness would be recognized in the income statement line item pertaining to the hedged item.

The Company typically enters into derivative instruments to meet the financing, interest rate and equity risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, the Company enters into offsetting positions to minimize interest rate and equity risk to the Company. These derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. These instruments and their offsetting positions are recorded in other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2008, the notional amount of the customer related derivative financial instrument was $9 million with an average maturity of 60 months, an average interest receive rate of 5.25% and an average interest pay rate of 4.40%.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:

In December 2007,2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007),ASU 2009-16,Business CombinationsAccounting for Transfer of Financial Assets(“FAS 141(R)), which establishes principles. ASU 2009-16 provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and requirements for howcomparability of the information that an acquirer recognizes and measuresentity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. FAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

     In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which removed leasing transactions accounted for under FAS No. 13 and related guidance from the scope of FAS No. 157. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No.157-2,Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, which deferred the effective date of FAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

44


     In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51. FAS No. 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidationeffects of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, this statement requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure,transfer on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. FAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
     In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to require enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new standard has revised financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring more transparency about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’sits financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. FAS No. 161 requires disclosure of the fair values of derivative instrumentsflows; and their gains and lossesa transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in a tabular format. It also requires entities to provide more information about their liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related. Further, it requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enabletransferred financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. FAS No. 161assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interimannual periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encourage.2009 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard isguidance did not expected to have a material effectimpact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations or financial position.
operation.

In April 2008,January 2010, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionASU No. 142-3,2010-06,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets(“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing assumptionsFair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about renewal or extension used in estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsFair Value Measurements. This standard is intendedASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and the period of expected cash flows usedincludes conforming amendments to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141R and other GAAP. FSP 142-3guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for financial statements issuedinterim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The measurement provisionsadoption of this standard will apply onlyguidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements or the Company has presented the necessary disclosures in the Notes 11 &12 herein.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08,Technical Corrections to intangible assetsVarious Topics. ASU 2010-08 clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation or the Company has presented the necessary disclosures in the Note 21 herein.

In July 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20,Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20 is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity’s credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in ASU 2010-20 encourage, but do not require, comparative disclosures for earlier reporting periods that ended before initial adoption. However, an entity should provide comparative disclosures for those reporting periods ending after initial adoption. The Company acquiredis currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal year, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities may early adopt the amendments using the effective date.date for public entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the FSPstandard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

     In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1,Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003),Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,to improve an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by the FSP are to be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this FSP is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

2. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS

Cash and due from banks at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, included $587,000 and $9,107,000, respectively,$150,000 of reserves required to be maintained under Federal Reserve Bank regulations.

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The cost basis and fair values of investment securities are summarized as follows:

Investment securities available for sale:

                 
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
      GROSS  GROSS    
      UNREALIZED  UNREALIZED  FAIR 
  COST BASIS  GAINS  LOSSES  VALUE 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Agency $10,387  $188  $  $10,575 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  114,380   2,057   (248)  116,189 
Other securities  24      (7)  17 
             
Total $124,791  $2,245  $(255) $126,781 
             

45


   AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   COST
BASIS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

U.S. Agency

  $15,956    $57    $(69 $15,944  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   145,727     3,714     (574  148,867  
                   

Total

  $161,683    $3,771    $(643 $164,811  
                   

Investment securities held to maturity:

       
   AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   COST
BASIS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

  $6,824    $452    $   $7,276  

Other securities

   1,000          (9  991  
                   

Total

  $7,824    $452    $(9 $8,267  
                   

Investment securities available for sale:

       
    AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   COST
BASIS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

U.S. Agency

  $12,342    $26    $(76 $12,292  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   116,088     3,128     (236  118,980  
                   

Total

  $128,430    $3,154    $(312 $131,272  
                   

Investment securities held to maturity:

       
    AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   COST
BASIS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
   GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

U.S. Treasury

  $3,009    $13    $   $3,022  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   7,602     373         7,975  

Other securities

   1,000          (1  999  
                   

Total

  $11,611    $386    $(1 $11,996  
                   

     Investment securities held to maturity:
                 
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
      GROSS  GROSS    
      UNREALIZED  UNREALIZED  FAIR 
  COST BASIS  GAINS  LOSSES  VALUE 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $3,082  $118  $  $3,200 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  9,562   321      9,883 
Other securities  3,250      (10)  3,240 
             
Total $15,894  $439  $(10) $16,323 
             
     Investment securities available for sale:
                 
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 
      GROSS  GROSS    
      UNREALIZED  UNREALIZED  FAIR 
  COST BASIS  GAINS  LOSSES  VALUE 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $6,006  $5  $  $6,011 
U.S. Agency  37,255   44   (12)  37,287 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  98,484   105   (1,328)  97,261 
Other securities  25      (2)  23 
             
Total $141,770  $154  $(1,342) $140,582 
             
     Investment securities held to maturity:
                 
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 
      GROSS  GROSS    
      UNREALIZED  UNREALIZED  FAIR 
  COST BASIS  GAINS  LOSSES  VALUE 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $3,153  $55  $  $3,208 
U.S. Agency  3,473   23      3,496 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  6,157   13      6,170 
Other securities  5,750      (246)  5,504 
             
Total $18,533  $91  $(246) $18,378 
             
Realized gains and losses are calculated by the specific identification method.

Maintaining investment quality is a primary objective of the Company’s investment policy which, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibits the purchase of any investment security below a Moody’s Investors Service or Standard & Poor’s rating of A. At December 31, 2008,97.7%2010, 99.4% of the portfolio was rated AAA as compared to 96.4%99.3% at December 31, 2007. Less than 1.0%2009. None of the portfolio was rated below A or unrated on December 31, 2008.2010. The Company and its subsidiaries, collectively, did not hold securities of any single issuer, excluding U.S. Treasury and U.S. Agencies, that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2008.

2010.

The book value of securities, both available for sale and held to maturity, pledged to secure public and trust deposits, and certain Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings was $119,267,000$86,894,000 at December 31, 20082010 and $146,365,000$103,196,000 at December 31, 2007. 2009.

The Company realized $157,000 of gross investment gains and no investment security losses in 2010, and $164,000 of gross investment gains and no investment security losses in 2009, and $42,000 of gross investment security gains and $137,000 of gross investment security losses for 2008 and no security gains or losses on available for sale securities in 2007 or 2006.2008. The Company realized no gross investment security gains and losses on held to maturity securities in 2008, 20072010, 2009 or 2006.2008. On a net basis, the realized losses gain for 2010 was $104,000, after factoring the tax expense of $53,000, the realized gains in 2009

amounted to $63,000 in 2008,$108,000, after factoring in tax expense of $56,000 and realized losses in 2008 of $63,000 after factoring in a tax benefit of $32,000. Proceeds$32,000.Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale were $25$2.7 million for 2010, $4.7 million for 2009, and $25.9 million during 2008. There were no sales of investment securities for 2007 or 2006.

The following table sets forth the contractual maturity distribution of the investment securities, cost basis and fair market values, and the weighted average yield for each type and range of maturity as of December 31, 2008.2010. Yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis, but are based upon the cost basis and are weighted for the scheduled maturity. The Company’s consolidated investment securities portfolio had a modified duration of approximately 1.803.12 years. The weighted average expected maturity for available for sale securities at December 31, 20082010 for U.S. Agency and U.S. Agency Mortgage-Backed was 4.45, and other securities was 2.80, 16.84, and 1.04.03 years, respectively. The weighted average expected maturity for held to maturity securities at December 31, 20082010 for U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency Mortgage-Backed and other securities was 1.17, 24.393.07 and 1.48 years.

46


Investment securities available for sale:
                                         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
          AFTER 1 YEAR  AFTER 5 YEARS       
          BUT WITHIN  BUT WITHIN       
  WITHIN 1 YEAR  5 YEARS  10 YEARS  AFTER 10 YEARS  TOTAL 
  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT YIELDS) 
COST BASIS                                        
U.S. Agency $996   5.30% $9,391   3.94% $   % $   % $10,387   4.08%
U.S. Agency mortgage- backed securities        13,899   4.75   16,261   4.93   84,220   4.58   114,380   4.65 
Other securities  24   4.70                     24   4.70 
                                    
Total investment securities available for sale $1,020   5.29% $23,290   4.27% $16,261   4.93% $84,220   4.58% $124,791   4.60%
                                    
FAIR VALUE                                        
U.S. Agency $1,016      $9,559      $      $      $10,575     
U.S. Agency mortgage- backed securities         13,901       16,812       85,476       116,189     
Other securities  17                            17     
                                    
Total investment securities available for sale $1,033      $23,460      $16,812      $85,476      $126,781     
                                    

  AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
  WITHIN 1 YEAR  AFTER 1 YEAR
BUT WITHIN
5 YEARS
  AFTER 5 YEARS
BUT WITHIN
10 YEARS
  AFTER 10
YEARS
  TOTAL 
  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT YIELDS) 

COST BASIS

          

U.S. Agency

 $     $12,456    2.21 $3,500    3.10 $     $15,956    2.40

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

  429    1.53          17,536    4.27    127,762    3.45    145,727    3.54  
                         

Total investment securities available for sale

 $429    1.53 $12,456    2.21 $21,036    4.08 $127,762    3.45 $161,683    3.43
                         

FAIR VALUE

          

U.S. Agency

 $    $12,441    $3,503    $    $15,944   

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

  429          18,526     129,912     148,867   
                         

Total investment securities available for sale

 $429    $12,441    $22,029    $129,912    $164,811   
                         

Investment securities held to maturity:

                                         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
                  AFTER 5 YEARS       
          AFTER 1 YEAR BUT  BUT WITHIN       
  WITHIN 1 YEAR  WITHIN 5 YEARS  10 YEARS  AFTER 10 YEARS  TOTAL 
  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT YIELDS) 
COST BASIS                                        
U.S. Treasury $   % $3,082   3.98% $   % $   % $3,082   3.98%
U.S. Agency mortgage -backed securities                    9,562   5.36   9,562   5.36 
Other securities  2,250   3.60   1,000   3.39                3,250   3.54 
                                    
Total investment securities held to maturity $2,250   3.60% $4,082   3.84% $   % $9,562   5.36% $15,894   4.72%
                                    
FAIR VALUE                                        
U.S. Treasury $      $3,200      $      $      $3,200     
U.S. Agency mortgage -backed securities                       9,883       9,883     
Other securities  2,249       991                     3,240     
                                    
Total investment securities held to maturity $2,249      $4,191      $      $9,883      $16,323     
                                    

  AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
  WITHIN 1 YEAR  AFTER 1 YEAR
BUT WITHIN

5 YEARS
  AFTER 5 YEARS
BUT WITHIN
10 YEARS
  AFTER
10 YEARS
  TOTAL 
  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT YIELDS) 

COST BASIS

          

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

 $     $     $     $6,824    5.29 $6,824    5.29

Other securities

          1,000    1.01                 1,000    1.01  
                         

Total investment securities held to maturity

 $     $1,000    1.01 $     $6,824    5.29 $7,824    4.78
                         

FAIR VALUE

          

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

 $    $    $    $7,276    $7,276   

Other securities

       991               991   
                         

Total investment securities held to maturity

 $    $991    $    $7,276    $8,267   
                         

The following tables present information concerning investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 20082010 (in thousands):

Investment securities available for sale:

                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities $31,063  $(226) $3,375  $(22) $34,438  $(248)
Other        17   (7)  17   (7)
                   
Total investment securities available for sale $31,063  $(226) $3,392  $(29) $34,455  $(255)
                   

    LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER   TOTAL 
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
 

U.S. Agency

  $4,204    $(69 $    $    $4,204    $(69

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   38,202     (574            38,202     (574
                             

Total investment securities available for sale

  $42,406    $(643 $    $    $42,406    $(643
                             

Investment securities held to maturity:

                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
Other $  $  $3,240  $(10) $3,240  $(10)
                   
Total investment securities held to maturity $  $  $3,240  $(10) $3,240  $(10)
                   

47


    LESS THAN 12 MONTHS   12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
 

Other securities

  $    $    $991    $(9 $991    $(9
                             

Total investment securities held to maturity

  $    $    $991    $(9 $991    $(9
                             

The following tables present information concerning investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 20072009 (in thousands):

Investment securities available for sale:

                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
U.S. Agency $  $  $25,963  $(12) $25,963  $(12)
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  4,388   (31)  81,085   (1,297)  85,473   (1,328)
Other  23   (2)        23   (2)
                   
Total investment securities available for sale $4,411  $(33) $107,048  $(1,309) $111,459  $(1,342)
                   

    LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER   TOTAL 
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
 

U.S. Agency

  $7,424    $(76 $    $    $7,424    $(76

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   17,525     (236            17,525     (236
                             

Total investment securities available for sale

  $24,949    $(312 $    $    $24,949    $(312
                             

Investment securities held to maturity:

                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
Other $  $  $5,504  $(246) $5,504  $(246)
                   
Total investment securities held to maturity $  $  $5,504  $(246) $5,504  $(246)
                   
     For fixed maturity investments with

    LESS THAN 12 MONTHS   12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
   FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
  FAIR
VALUE
   UNREALIZED
LOSSES
 

Other securities

  $    $    $999    $(1 $999    $(1
                             

Total investment securities held to maturity

  $    $    $999    $(1 $999    $(1
                             

The unrealized losses due to interest rates whereare primarily a result of increases in market yields from the Company hastime of purchase. In general, as market yields rise, the positive intent and ability to holdvalue of securities will decrease; as market yields fall, the investment for a periodfair value of time sufficient to allow a market recovery, declines in value below cost are not assumed to be other than temporary.securities will increase. There are 2128 positions that are considered temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008. The Company reviews its position quarterly2010. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary; therefore, these securities have not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. Management has also concluded that based on current information we expect to continue to receive scheduled interest payments as well as the entire principal balance. Furthermore, management does not intend to sell these securities and has asserted that at December 31, 2008, the declines outlineddoes not believe it will be required to sell these securities before they recover in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does have the ability and intent to hold those securities to maturity or to allow a market recovery.

value.

4. LOANS

The loan portfolio of the Company consisted of the following:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Commercial $110,197  $118,936 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  353,870   285,115 
Real estate-mortgage  218,928   214,839 
Consumer  23,804   16,676 
       
Loans  706,799   635,566 
Less: Unearned income  691   471 
       
Loans, net of unearned income $706,108  $635,095 
       

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

  $78,322    $96,158  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   369,904     396,123  

Real estate-mortgage

   203,317     207,214  

Consumer

   19,233     19,619  
          

Loans, net of unearned income

  $670,776    $719,114  
          

Loan balances at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are net of unearned income of $477,000 and $671,000, respectively.

Real estate construction loans comprised 6.2%3.9% and 5.5%6.8% of total loans net of unearned income at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively. The Company has no exposure to sub primesubprime mortgage loans in either

the loan or investment portfolios. The Company has no direct credit exposure to foreign countries. Additionally, the Company has no significant industry lending concentrations. As of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, loans to customers engaged in similar activities and having similar economic characteristics, as defined by standard industrial classifications, did not exceed 10% of total loans.

Additionally, the majority of the Company’s lending occurs within a 100 mile radius of the Johnstown market.

In the ordinary course of business, the subsidiaries have transactions, including loans, with their officers, directors, and their affiliated companies. TheseIn managements opinion, these transactions were on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated parties and do not involve more than the normal credit risk. These loans totaled $6,121,000$1,028,000 and $4,729,000$1,183,000 at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively. An analysis of these related party loans follows:

         
  YEAR ENDED 
  DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Balance January 1 $4,729  $3,977 
New loans  2,209   1,457 
Payments  (817)  (705)
       
Balance December 31 $6,121  $4,729 
       

48


   YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
 
   2010  2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Balance January 1

  $1,183   $6,121  

New loans

   198    1,220  

Payments

   (353  (4,130

Reduction due to director retirement

       (2,028
         

Balance December 31

  $1,028   $1,183  
         

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Balance January 1 $7,252  $8,092  $9,143 
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off  446   192   318 
Loans charged-off  (1,713)  (1,332)  (1,244)
          
Balance December 31 $8,910  $7,252  $8,092 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Balance January 1

  $19,685   $8,910   $7,252  

Provision for loan losses

   5,250    15,150    2,925  

Recoveries on loans previously charged-off

   461    755    446  

Loans charged-off

   (5,631  (5,130  (1,713
             

Balance December 31

  $19,765   $19,685   $8,910  
             

The following table summarizes the primary segments of the loan portfolio.

   AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   COMMERCIAL   COMMERCIAL
LOANS
SECURED BY
REAL ESTATE
   REAL
ESTATE-
MORTGAGE
   CONSUMER   TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $4,065    $8,082    $    $    $12,147  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   74,257     361,822     203,317     19,233     658,629  
                         

Total loans

  $78,322    $369,904    $203,317    $19,233    $670,776  
                         

  AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
  COMMERCIAL  COMMERCIAL
LOANS
SECURED BY
REAL ESTATE
  REAL
ESTATE-
MORTGAGE
  CONSUMER  ALLOCATION
FOR
GENERAL
RISK
  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 

Specific reserve allocation

 $1,905   $1,901   $   $   $   $3,806  

General reserve allocation

  1,946    10,816    1,117    206    1,874    15,959  
                        

Total allowance for loan losses

 $3,851   $12,717   $1,117   $206   $1,874   $19,765  
                        
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2009    
  COMMERCIAL  COMMERCIAL
LOANS
SECURED BY
REAL ESTATE
  REAL
ESTATE-
MORTGAGE
  CONSUMER  TOTAL    
  (IN THOUSANDS)    

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $3,082   $11,996   $   $   $15,078   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  93,076    384,127    207,214    19,619    704,036   
                     

Total loans

 $96,158   $396,123   $207,214   $19,619   $719,114   
                     
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 
  COMMERCIAL  COMMERCIAL
LOANS
SECURED BY
REAL ESTATE
  REAL
ESTATE-
MORTGAGE
  CONSUMER  ALLOCATION
FOR
GENERAL
RISK
  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 

Specific reserve allocation

 $1,090   $3,905   $   $   $   $4,995  

General reserve allocation

  3,666    8,787    1,015    204    1,018    14,690  
                        

Total allowance for loan losses

 $4,756   $12,692   $1,015   $204   $1,018   $19,685  
                        

The segments of the Company’s loan portfolio are disaggregated to a level that allows management to monitor risk and performance. The overall risk profile for the commercial loan segment is driven by non-owner occupied CRE loans, which include loans secured by non-owner occupied nonfarm nonresidential properties, as the majority of the commercial portfolio is centered in these types of accounts. The residential mortgage loan segment is comprised of first lien amortizing residential mortgage loans and home equity loans. The consumer loan segment consists primarily of installment loans and overdraft lines of credit connected with customer deposit accounts.

Management evaluates for possible impairment any individual loan in the commercial segment with a loan balance in excess of $100,000 that is in nonaccrual status or classified as a Troubled Debt Restructure. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in evaluating impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis,

taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. The Company does not separately evaluate individual consumer and residential mortgage loans for impairment, unless such loans are part of larger relationship that is impaired, or are classified as a troubled debt restructuring agreement.

Once the determination has been made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of three methods: (a) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. The method is selected on a loan-by loan basis, with management primarily utilizing the fair value of collateral method. The evaluation of the need and amount of a specific allocation of the allowance and whether a loan can be removed from impairment status is made on a quarterly basis. The Company’s policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans does not differ from its overall policy for interest recognition.

The following table presents impaired loans by class, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not necessary.

   DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   IMPAIRED LOANS WITH
SPECIFIC ALLOWANCE
   IMPAIRED
LOANS WITH
NO SPECIFIC
ALLOWANCE
   TOTAL IMPAIRED LOANS 
   RECORDED
INVESTMENT
   RELATED
ALLOWANCE
   RECORDED
INVESTMENT
   RECORDED
INVESTMENT
   UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

  $4,041    $1,905    $24    $4,065    $4,842  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   4,938     1,901     3,144     8,082     8,341  
                         

Total impaired loans

  $8,979    $3,806    $3,168    $12,147    $13,183  
                         
   DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   IMPAIRED LOANS WITH
SPECIFIC ALLOWANCE
   IMPAIRED
LOANS WITH
NO SPECIFIC
ALLOWANCE
   TOTAL IMPAIRED LOANS 
   RECORDED
INVESTMENT
   RELATED
ALLOWANCE
   RECORDED
INVESTMENT
   RECORDED
INVESTMENT
   UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

  $2,967    $1,090    $115    $3,082    $3,795  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   11,996     3,905          11,996     12,020  
                         

Total impaired loans

  $14,963    $4,995    $115    $15,078    $15,815  
                         

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated.

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009   2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Average investment in impaired loans

  $18,202    $11,248    $1,605  

Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans

   458     75       

Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized. The first five “Pass” categories are aggregated, while the Pass 6, Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful categories are disaggregated to separate pools. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due, or for which any portion of the loan represents a specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses are placed in Substandard or Doubtful.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Company has a structured loan rating process, which dictates that, at a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $250,000 within a 12-month period. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, delinquency, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Company’s commercial relationship managers are responsible for the timely and accurate risk rating of the loans in their portfolios at origination and on an ongoing basis. Risk ratings are assigned by the account officer, but require independent review and rating concurrence from the Company’s internal Loan Review Department. The Loan Review Department is an experienced independent function which reports directly to the Board Audit Committee. The scope of commercial portfolio coverage by the Loan Review Department is defined and presented to the Audit Committee for approval on an annual basis. The approved scope of coverage for 2010 required a minimum range-of-coverage of 60% to 70% of the commercial loan portfolio. Actual coverage was 68% of the aggregate commercial loan portfolio balance as of December 31, 2010.

In addition to loan monitoring by the account officer and Loan Review Department, the Company also requires presentation of all credits rated Pass-6 with aggregate balances greater than $1,000,000, all credits rated Special Mention or Substandard with aggregate balances greater than $250,000, and all credits rated Doubtful with aggregate balances greater than $100,000 on an individual basis to the Company’s Loan Loss Reserve Committee on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate Pass and the criticized categories of Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful within the internal risk rating system.

   DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   PASS   SPECIAL
MENTION
   SUBSTANDARD   DOUBTFUL   TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

  $61,961    $8,797    $5,793    $1,771    $78,322  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   306,555     33,165     29,754     430     369,904  
                         

Total

  $368,516    $41,962    $35,547    $2,201    $448,226  
                         

   DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   PASS   SPECIAL
MENTION
   SUBSTANDARD   DOUBTFUL   TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

  $69,510    $8,086    $17,074    $1,488    $96,158  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   324,911     43,212     28,000          396,123  
                         

Total

  $394,421    $51,298    $45,074    $1,488    $492,281  
                         

It is the policy of the bank that the outstanding balance of any residential mortgage loan that exceeds 90-days past due as to principal and/or interest is transferred to non-accrual status and an evaluation is completed to determine the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. A charge down is recorded for any deficiency balance determined from the collateral evaluation. The remaining non-accrual balance is reported as impaired with no specific allowance. It is the policy of the bank that the outstanding balance of any consumer loan that exceeds 90-days past due as to principal and/or interest is charged off.

   DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   PERFORMING   NON-PERFORMING 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Real estate-mortgage

  $201,438    $1,879  

Consumer

   19,233       
          

Total

  $220,671    $1,879  
          

   DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   PERFORMING   NON-PERFORMING 
   (IN THOUSANDS)  

Real estate-mortgage

  $205,189    $2,025  

Consumer

   19,619       
          

Total

  $224,808    $2,025  
          

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans.

  DECEMBER 31, 2010 
  CURRENT  30-59
DAYS
PAST DUE
  60-89
DAYS
PAST DUE
  90 DAYS
PAST DUE
  TOTAL
PAST  DUE
  NON-
ACCRUAL
  TOTAL
LOANS
 
     (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

 $74,643   $   $   $   $   $3,679   $78,322  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

  362,890    283            283    6,731    369,904  

Real estate-mortgage

  199,003    1,892    543        2,435    1,879    203,317  

Consumer

  19,160    29    44        73        19,233  
                            

Total

 $655,696   $2,204   $587   $   $2,791   $12,289   $670,776  
                            

  DECEMBER 31, 2009 
  CURRENT  30-59
DAYS
PAST DUE
  60-89
DAYS
PAST DUE
  90 DAYS
PAST DUE
  TOTAL
PAST  DUE
  NON-
ACCRUAL
  TOTAL
LOANS
 
     (IN THOUSANDS) 

Commercial

 $92,783   $   $   $   $   $3,375   $96,158  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

  375,812    8,595            8,595    11,716    396,123  

Real estate-mortgage

  202,479    2,056    654        2,710    2,025    207,214  

Consumer

  19,516    68    35        103        19,619  
                            

Total

 $690,590   $10,719   $689   $   $11,408   $17,116   $719,114  
                            

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio,

assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. For general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors.

Management tracks the historical net charge-off activity at each risk rating grade level for the entire commercial portfolio and at the aggregate level for the consumer, residential mortgage and small business portfolios. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a rolling 12 consecutive historical quarters for the commercial portfolios. This historical charge-off factor for the consumer, residential mortgage and small business portfolios are based on a three year historical average of actual loss experience.

As described in more detail in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies section in Note 1, the Company uses a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to maintain an ALL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The Company believes this is a critical accounting policy since it involves significant estimates and judgments. The allowance consists of three elements: 1) an allowance established on specifically identified problem loans, 2) formula driven general reserves established for loan categories based upon historical loss experience and other qualitative factors which include delinquency and non-performing loan trends, economic trends, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies, and trends in policy, financial information, and documentation exceptions, and 3) a general risk reserve which provides support for variance from our assessment of the previously listed qualitative factors, provides protection against credit risks resulting from other inherent risk factors contained in the Company’s loan portfolio, and recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances. The qualitative factors used in the formula driven general reserves are evaluated quarterly (and revised if necessary) by the Company’s management to establish allocations which accommodate each of the listed risk factors.

“Pass” rated credits are segregated from “Criticized” credits for the application of qualitative factors.

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis using a defined, consistently applied process in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.

6. NON-PERFORMING ASSETS

Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans which are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, (iii) performing loans classified as troubled debt restructuring and (iii)(iv) other real estate owned (real estate acquired through foreclosure, in-substance foreclosures and repossessed assets).

The following tables present information concerning non-performing assets:

             
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT 
  PERCENTAGES) 
Non-accrual loans            
             
Commercial $1,128  $3,553  $494 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  484   225   195 
Real estate-mortgage  1,313   875   1,050 
Consumer  452   585   547 
          
Total  3,377   5,238   2,286 
          
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing            
Consumer        3 
          
Total        3 
          
Other real estate owned            
Commercial loans secured by real estate  701       
Real estate-mortgage  494   42   3 
          
Total  1,195   42   3 
          
Total non-performing assets $4,572  $5,280  $2,292 
          
Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.65%  0.83%  0.39%
Total restructured loans (included in non-accrual loans above) $1,360  $1,217  $1,302 

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
PERCENTAGES)
 

Non-accrual loans

    

Commercial

  $3,679   $3,375   $1,128  

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   6,731    11,716    484  

Real estate-mortgage

   1,879    2,025    1,765  
             

Total

   12,289    17,116    3,377  
             

Other real estate owned

    

Commercial loans secured by real estate

   436    871    701  

Real estate-mortgage

   302    350    494  
             

Total

   738    1,221    1,195  
             

Total restructured loans not in non-accrual (TDR)

   1,337          
             

Total non-performing assets including TDR

  $14,364   $18,337   $4,572  
             

Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale,
net of unearned income, and other real estate owned

   2.12  2.53  0.65

The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1) fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2) carrying cost.

The Company had non-accrual loans totaling $1,612,000$10,410,000 and $3,778,000$15,091,000 being specifically identified as impaired and a corresponding allocation reserve of $755,000$3,806,000 and $694,000$4,995,000 at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively. The average outstanding balance for loans being specifically identified as impaired was $1,605,000$18,202,000 for 20082010 and $3,907,000$11,248,000 for 2007.2009. A majority of the impaired loans are secured by sellable collateral,collateral; the estimated timing of the liquidation of the collateral and the estimated fair value of the collateral are evaluated in measuring the impairment. The interest income recognized on impaired loans during 2010, 2009 and 2008 2007was $458,000, $75,000 and 2006 was $123,000, $0, and $34,000, respectively.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i)(1) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii)(2) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii)(3) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans.

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest income due in accordance with original terms $198  $215  $214 
Interest income recorded  (148)  (40)  (87)
          
Net reduction in interest income $50  $175  $127 
          

49


   YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Interest income due in accordance with original terms

  $1,086   $553   $198  

Interest income recorded

   (458  (75    
             

Net reduction in interest income

  $628   $478   $198  
             

7. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

An analysis of premises and equipment follows:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Land $1,208  $1,208 
Premises  20,845   20,041 
Furniture and equipment  13,501   15,681 
Leasehold improvements  599   612 
       
Total at cost  36,153   37,542 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  26,632   29,092 
       
Net book value $9,521  $8,450 
       

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Land

  $1,208    $1,208  

Premises

   22,780     21,541  

Furniture and equipment

   7,087     13,994  

Leasehold improvements

   512     599  
          

Total at cost

   31,587     37,342  

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   21,102     28,113  
          

Net book value

  $10,485    $9,229  
          

The Company recorded depreciation expense of $1.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million for 2010, 2009 and $1.7 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

8. DEPOSITS

The following table sets forth the balance of the Company’s deposits:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Demand:        
Non-interest bearing $116,372  $113,380 
Interest bearing  60,900   63,199 
Savings  70,682   69,155 
Money market  129,692   117,973 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  36,166   41,390 
Other time  281,144   305,342 
       
Total deposits $694,956  $710,439 
       

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Demand:

    

Non-interest bearing

  $127,870    $118,232  

Interest bearing

   59,206     61,292  

Savings

   76,762     72,557  

Money market

   173,234     181,139  

Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more

   50,808     45,169  

Other time

   313,336     307,622  
          

Total deposits

  $801,216    $786,011  
          

Interest expense on deposits consisted of the following:

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest bearing demand $653  $1,184  $606 
Savings  535   549   644 
Money market  2,417   6,040   5,743 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  1,744   1,774   1,894 
Other time  10,331   13,264   10,345 
          
Total interest expense $15,680  $22,811  $19,232 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009   2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Interest bearing demand

  $176    $256    $653  

Savings

   397     530     535  

Money market

   1,622     2,437     2,417  

Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more

   834     1,186     1,744  

Other time

   7,916     8,700     10,331  
               

Total interest expense

  $10,945    $13,109    $15,680  
               

The following table sets forth the balance of other time deposits and certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 20082010 maturing in the periods presented:

         
      CERTIFICATES OF 
      DEPOSIT 
  OTHER TIME DEPOSITS  OF $100,000 OR MORE 
YEAR  (IN THOUSANDS) 
2008 $165,136  $28,760 
2009  50,410   3,707 
2010  23,207   1,285 
2011  14,655   433 
2012  9,396   1,704 
2013 and after  18,340   277 
       
Total $281,144  $36,166 
       

50


YEAR

  OTHER TIME DEPOSITS   CERTIFICATES OF
DEPOSIT
OF $100,000 OR MORE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

2011

  $161,758    $39,711  

2012

   64,794     8,211  

2013

   33,991     2,553  

2014

   7,496     149  

2015

   12,651     184  

2016 and after

   32,646       
          

Total

  $313,336    $50,808  
          

The maturities on certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2008,2010, are as follows:
     MATURING IN:
     
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Three months or less $11,813 
Over three through six months  13,382 
Over six through twelve months  3,565 
Over twelve months  7,406 
    
Total $36,166 
    

   (IN THOUSANDS) 

MATURING IN:

  

Three months or less

  $12,695  

Over three through six months

   21,695  

Over six through twelve months

   5,321  

Over twelve months

   11,097  
     

Total

  $50,808  
     

9. FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The outstanding balances and related information for federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
  FEDERAL  
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $119,920 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  5,685   138,855 
Average balance during year  20   71,617 
Average rate paid for the year  3.16%  1.96%
Interest rate on year end balance     0.60 
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007
  FEDERAL  
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $72,210 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  3,430   74,095 
Average balance during year  99   19,745 
Average rate paid for the year  5.18%  4.89%
Interest rate on year end balance     3.88 

   AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   FEDERAL
FUNDS
PURCHASED
  SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES) 

Balance

  $   $4,550  

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

       9,230  

Average balance during year

   9    3,110  

Average rate paid for the year

   0.51  0.71

Interest rate on year end balance

       0.62  

   AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   FEDERAL
FUNDS
PURCHASED
  SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES) 

Balance

  $   $25,775  

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

   5,968    54,649  

Average balance during year

   1,358    19,670  

Average rate paid for the year

   0.50  0.67

Interest rate on year end balance

       0.62  

Average amounts outstanding during the year represent daily averages. Average interest rates represent interest expense divided by the related average balances.

These borrowing transactions can range from overnight to one year in maturity. The average maturity was three days at the end of 2010 and two days at the end of 2008 and 2007.

2009.

10.ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK AND GUARANTEED JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES

Borrowings and advances from the FHLB consist of the following:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
  WEIGHTED    
  AVERAGE YIELD  BALANCE 
MATURING  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Overnight  1.96% $119,920 
         
2009  4.17   3,004 
2010  3.36   10,000 
2011 and after  6.44   854 
        
Total advances  3.72   13,858 
        
Total FHLB borrowings  2.14% $133,778 
        

51


    AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 

MATURING

  WEIGHTED
AVERAGE  YIELD
  BALANCE 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Overnight

   0.62 $4,550  

2012

   1.82    4,000  

2013

   2.04    5,000  

2016 and after

   6.44    750  
      

Total advances

   2.28    9,750  
      

Total FHLB borrowings

   1.75 $14,300  
      

    AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 

MATURING

  WEIGHTED
AVERAGE  YIELD
  BALANCE 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Overnight

   0.62 $25,775  

2010

   1.67    22,000  

2012

   1.97    3,000  

2016 and after

   6.44    804  
      

Total advances

   1.85    25,804  
      

Total FHLB borrowings

   1.24 $51,579  
      

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 
  WEIGHTED    
  AVERAGE YIELD  BALANCE 
MATURING  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Overnight  3.88% $72,210 
         
2009  4.62   9,004 
2010 and after  6.45   901 
        
Total advances  4.79   9,905 
        
Total FHLB borrowings  3.99% $82,115 
        
The Company’s subsidiary bankBank is a member of the FHLB which provides this subsidiary with the opportunity to obtain short to longer-term advances based upon the bank’sCompany’s investment in assets secured by one- to four-family residential real estate. The rate on open repo plus advances, which are typically overnight borrowings, can change daily, while the rate on the advances is fixed until the maturity of the advance. All FHLB stock along with an interest in certain residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities,commercial real-estate loans with an aggregate statutory value equal to the amount of the advances, are pledged as collateral to the FHLB of Pittsburgh to support these borrowings. borrowings.At December 31, 2008,2010, the bankCompany had immediately available $183$244 million of overnight borrowing capability at the FHLB and $10$23 million of unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks.

Guaranteed Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures:

On April 28, 1998, the Company completed a $34.5 million public offering of 8.45% Trust Preferred Securities, which represent undivided beneficial interests in the assets of a Delaware business trust, AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I. The Trust Preferred Securities will mature on June 30, 2028, and are callable at par at the option of the Company after June 30, 2003. Proceeds of the issue were invested by AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I in Junior Subordinated Debentures issued by AmeriServ Financial, Inc. Unamortized deferred

issuance costs associated with the Trust Preferred Securities amounted to $302,000$271,000 as of December 31, 20082010 and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet, and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the issue. The Trust Preferred securities are listed on NASDAQ under the symbol ASRVP. AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I was deconsolidated in the first quarter of 2004 in accordance with FASB Interpretation #46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46(R)). The Company used $22.5 million of proceeds from a private placement of common stock to redeem Trust Preferred Securities in 2005 and 2004. The balance as of December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 was $13.1 million.

11. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

     Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and financial liabilities. FAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.

The standard applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. The FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which removed leasing transactions accounted for under FAS No. 13 and related guidance from the scope of FAS No. 157. The FASB also issued Staff Position No.157-2,Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, which deferred the effective date of FAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.

     FAS No. 157 establishesfollowing disclosures establish a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels defined by FAS No. 157within this hierarchy are as follows:
Level I:Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
Level II:Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
Level III:Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

Level I: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level II: Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level III: Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may

52


include dealer quoted market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. This applies to all available for sale securities except U.S. Treasury and equity securities which are considered to be Level 1.

Residential real estate loans held for sale are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. Residential real estate loans are valued based on quoted market prices from purchase commitments from market participants and are classified as Level 1.

The fair value of the swap asset is based on an external derivative valuation model using data inputs as of the valuation date and classified Level 2.

The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value as of December 31, 2008,2010 and 2009, by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by FAS No. 157, financialFinancial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

                 
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
      Quoted Prices in Significant  
      Active Markets Other Significant
      for Observable Unobservable
      Identical Assets Inputs Inputs
  Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Assets:                
Available for sale securities $126,781  $17  $126,764  $ 
Loans held for sale  1,000   1,000       
Fair value swap asset  336      336    
Assets Measured on a Non-recurring Basis
     Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
                 
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using 
      Quoted Prices in  Significant    
      Active Markets  Other  Significant 
      for  Observable  Unobservable 
      Identical Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
  Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Assets:                
Impaired loans $857  $  $857  $ 
Other real estate owned  1,195      1,195    

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using 
  Total   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

        

U.S. Agency securities

  $15,944    $    $15,944    $  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   148,867          148,867       

Fair value swap asset

   420          420       

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using 
  Total   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

        

U.S. Agency securities

  $12,292    $    $12,292    $  

U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities

   118,980          118,980       

Fair value swap asset

   154          154       

Loans considered impaired under FAS 114,“Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” as amended by FAS 118,“Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — Income Recognition and Disclosure,”are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurringreported at fair value adjustments to reflect (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the underlying collateral or (2)if the full charge-off ofrepayment is expected solely from the carrying value. All of the Company’scollateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 inputs based on observable market data which at times are discounted. At December 31, 2010, impaired loans are classified as level 2.

     Other real estate owned (OREO)with a carrying value of $12.1 million were reduced by specific valuation allowance totaling $3.8 million resulting in a net fair value of $8.3 million.

OREO is measured at fair value based on appraisals, less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, valuationsforeclosure. Valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. Income and expenses from operations and changes in valuation allowance are included in the net expenses from OREO.

Assets Measured on a Non-recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using 
   Total   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

        

Impaired loans

  $8,341    $    $8,341    $  

Other real estate owned

   738          738       

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using 
   Total   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

        

Impaired loans

  $9,268    $    $9,268    $  

Other real estate owned

   1,221          1,221       

12. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

For the Company, as for most financial institutions, approximately 90% of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. Many of the Company’s financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Therefore, significant estimates and present value calculations were used by the Company for the purpose of this disclosure.

53


     Estimated fairFair values have been determined by the Company using independent third party valuations that uses best available data (Level 2) and an estimation methodology (level(Level 3) the Company believes is suitable for each category of financial instruments. Management believes that cash, cash equivalents, and loans and deposits with floating interest rates have estimated fair values which approximate the recorded book balances. The estimation methodologies used, the estimated fair values based off of FAS 157on US GAAP measurements, and recorded book balances at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, were as follows:
                 
  2008 2007
  ESTIMATED RECORDED ESTIMATED RECORDED
  FAIR VALUE BOOK BALANCE FAIR VALUE BOOK BALANCE
  (IN THOUSANDS)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:                
Investment securities $143,104  $142,675  $163,319  $163,474 
Regulatory stock  9,739   9,739   7,204   7,204 
Net loans (including loans held for sale), net of allowance for loan loss  701,066   698,198   632,609   628,903 
Accrued income receivable  3,735   3,735   4,032   4,032 
Bank owned life insurance  32,929   32,929   32,864   32,864 
Fair value swap asset  336   336       
                 
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:                
Deposits with no stated maturities $377,646  $377,646  $363,707  $363,707 
Deposits with stated maturities  320,201   317,310   347,361   346,732 
Short-term borrowings  119,920   119,920   72,210   72,210 
All other borrowings  31,472   26,943   25,811   22,990 
Accrued interest payable  4,062   4,062   4,961   4,961 
Fair value swap liability  336   336       

   2010   2009 
   FAIR
VALUE
   RECORDED
BOOK  BALANCE
   FAIR
VALUE
   RECORDED
BOOK  BALANCE
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

FINANCIAL ASSETS:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $19,337    $19,337    $26,308    $26,308  

Investment securities

   173,078     172,635     143,268     142,883  

Regulatory stock

   9,358     9,358     9,739     9,739  

Loans held for sale

   7,542     7,405     3,840     3,790  

Loans, net of allowance for loan loss and unearned income

   651,866     651,011     695,930     699,429  

Accrued income receivable

   3,210     3,210     3,589     3,589  

Bank owned life insurance

   34,466     34,466     33,690     33,690  

Fair value swap asset

   420     420     154     154  

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:

        

Deposits with no stated maturities

  $437,072    $437,072    $433,220    $433,220  

Deposits with stated maturities

   369,972     364,144     357,275     352,791  

Short-term borrowings

   4,550     4,550     25,775     25,775  

All other borrowings

   25,419     22,835     41,272     38,889  

Accrued interest payable

   3,541     3,541     4,136     4,136  

Fair value swap liability

   420     420     154     154  

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, regulatory stock, accrued income receivable, short-term borrowings, and accrued interest payable are equal to the current carrying value.

The fair value of investment securities is equal to the available quoted market price.

     The fair value of regulatory stock is equal to the current carrying value.

The net loan portfolio has been valued using a present value discounted cash flow. The discount rate used in these calculations is based upon the treasury yield curve adjusted for non-interest operating costs, credit loss, current market prices and assumed prepayment risk.

     The fair value of accrued income receivable is equal to the current carrying value.

The fair value of bank owned life insurance is based upon the cash surrender value of the underlying policies and matches the book value.

Deposits with stated maturities have been valued using a present value discounted cash flow with a discount rate approximating current market for similar assets and liabilities. Deposits with no stated maturities have an estimated fair value equal to both the amount payable on demand and the recorded book balance.

     The fair value of short-term borrowings is equal to the current carrying value.

The fair value of other borrowed funds are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities.

     The fair value of accrued interest payable is equal to the current carrying value.

The fair values of the fair value swaps used for interest rate risk management represents the amount the Company would have expected to receive or pay to terminate such agreements.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on these estimated fair values. The Company’s remaining assets and liabilities which are not considered financial instruments have not been valued differently than has been customary under historical cost accounting.

     There is not a material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of the off-balance sheet items which total $112.2 million at December 31, 2008, and are primarily comprised of unfunded loan commitments which are generally priced at market at the time of funding.

54


13. INCOME TAXES

The expense for income taxes is summarized below:

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Current $121  $116  $76 
Deferred  1,349   808   344 
          
Income tax expense $1,470  $924  $420 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
      2010        2009        2008    
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Current

  $206   $170   $121  

Deferred

   (126  (3,220  1,349  
             

Income tax (benefit) expense

  $80   $(3,050 $1,470  
             

The reconciliation between the federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective consolidated income tax rate is as follows:

                         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  AMOUNT  RATE  AMOUNT  RATE  AMOUNT  RATE 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Income tax expense based on federal statutory rate $2,373   34.0% $1,346   34.0% $936   34.0%
Tax exempt income  (985)  (14.1)  (506)  (12.8)  (478)  (17.4)
Reversal of valuation allowance              (100)  (3.6)
Other  82   1.2   84   2.1   62   2.3 
                   
Total expense for income taxes $1,470   21.1% $924   23.3% $420   15.3%
                   

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   AMOUNT  RATE  AMOUNT  RATE  AMOUNT  RATE 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 

Income tax (benefit) expense based on federal statutory rate

  $463    34.0 $(2,701  (34.0)%  $2,373    34.0

Tax exempt income

   (443  (32.5  (443  (5.6  (985  (14.1

Other

   60    4.4    94    1.2    82    1.2  
                         

Total (benefit) expense for income taxes

  $80    5.9 $(3,050  (38.4)%  $1,470    21.1
                         

December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, deferred taxes are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table highlights the major components comprising the deferred tax assets and liabilities for each of the periods presented:

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:        
Allowance for loan losses $3,029  $2,465 
Unfunded commitment reserve  167   135 
Premises and equipment  1,102   876 
Accrued pension obligation  1,165   100 
Unrealized investment security losses     403 
Net operating loss carryforwards  6,362   8,539 
Alternative minimum tax credits  1,301   1,132 
Other  396   332 
       
Total tax assets  13,522   13,982 
       
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:        
Investment accretion  (36)  (26)
Unrealized investment security gains  (676)   
Other  (159)  (206)
       
Total tax liabilities  (871)  (232)
       
Net deferred tax asset $12,651  $13,750 
       

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:

   

Allowance for loan losses

  $6,720   $6,692  

Unfunded commitment reserve

   298    240  

Premises and equipment

   1,193    796  

Accrued pension obligation

   1,867    1,510  

Net operating loss carryforwards

   5,444    6,028  

Alternative minimum tax credits

   1,352    1,389  

Other

   504    459  
         

Total tax assets

   17,378    17,114  
         

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:

   

Investment accretion

   (34  (30

Unrealized investment security gains

   (1,064  (967

Other

   (222  (192
         

Total tax liabilities

   (1,320  (1,189
         

Net deferred tax asset

  $16,058   $15,925  
         

At December 31, 2008,2010 and 2009, the Company had no valuation allowance established against its deferred tax assets as we believe the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income to fully utilize all net operating loss carryforwards and AMT tax credits.

The change in net deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:

         
  YEAR ENDED 
  DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Investment write-ups due to FAS #115, charged to equity $(1,079) $(1,272)
Pension obligation of the defined benefit plan not yet recognized in income  1,329   (7)
Deferred provision for income taxes  (1,349)  (808)
       
Net decrease $(1,099) $(2,087)
       

   YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
 
   2010  2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Unrealized gains or losses recognized in comprehensive income

  $(98 $(291

Pension obligation of the defined benefit plan not yet recognized in income

   357    345  

Deferred benefit (provision) for income taxes

   (126  3,220  
         

Net increase

  $133   $3,274  
         

The Company has alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.3$1.4 million at December 31, 2008.2010. These credits have an indefinite carryforward period. The Company also has an $18.7a $16.0 million net operating loss carryforward that will begin to expire in the year 2024.

55

2025.


The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement 109, effective January 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 prescribesutilizes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance onThe Company’s federal and state income tax returns for taxable years through 2006 have been closed for purposes of examination by the accounting forInternal Revenue Service and disclosurethe Pennsylvania Department of unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties. The adoption of FIN No. 48 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Revenue.

14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

PENSION PLANS:

The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering all employees who work at least 1,000 hours per year. The participants shall have a vested interest in their accrued benefit after five full years of service. The benefits of the plan are based upon the employee’s years of service and average annual earnings for the highest five consecutive calendar years during the final ten year period of employment. Plan assets are primarily debt securities (including U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, corporate notes and bonds), listed common stocks (including shares of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. common stock valued at $414,000$329,000 and is limited to 10% of the plansplan’s assets), mutual funds, and short-term cash equivalent instruments. The following actuarial tables are based upon data provided by an independent third party as of December 31, 2008.

2010.

PENSION BENEFITS:

         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $16,231  $15,410 
Service cost  926   927 
Interest cost  937   880 
Actuarial (gain) loss  (78)  109 
Special termination benefits     85 
Benefits paid  (1,215)  (1,180)
       
Benefit obligation at end of year  16,801   16,231 
       
         
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  15,929   15,091 
Actual return on plan assets  (2,912)  918 
Employer contributions  1,400   1,100 
Benefits paid  (1,215)  (1,180)
       
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  13,202   15,929 
       
Funded status of the plan—under funded $(3,599) $(302)
       
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
AMOUNTS NOT YET RECOGNIZED AS A COMPONENT OF NET PERIODIC PENSION COST:        
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of:        
Transition asset $17  $17 
Prior service cost  (4)  (4)
Net actuarial loss (gain)  3,711   (34)
       
Total $3,724  $(21)
       
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Accumulated benefit obligation $14,850  $14,254 
       

56


  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 

CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:

  

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 $19,855   $16,801  

Service cost

  1,097    1,021  

Interest cost

  1,186    1,058  

Actuarial loss

  2,129    1,278  

Benefits paid

  (930  (303
        

Benefit obligation at end of year

  23,337    19,855  
        

CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:

  

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  15,479    13,202  

Actual return on plan assets

  1,700    1,080  

Employer contributions

  1,500    1,500  

Benefits paid

  (930  (303
        

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  17,749    15,479  
        

Funded status of the plan — under funded

 $(5,588 $(4,376
        
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 

AMOUNTS NOT YET RECOGNIZED AS A COMPONENT OF NET PERIODIC PENSION COST:

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of:

  

Transition asset

 $(42 $(58

Prior service cost

  (51  (36

Net actuarial loss

  10,743    9,553  
        

Total

 $10,650   $9,459  
        
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 

ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 $21,678   $17,906  
        

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 were as follows:
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007
  (PERCENTAGES)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:        
Discount rate  6.25%  6.00%
Salary scale  2.50   2.50 
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST:            
Service cost $926  $927  $882 
Interest cost  937   880   816 
Expected return on plan assets  (1,232)  (1,146)  (1,007)
Amortization of prior year service cost  4   4   4 
Amortization of transition asset  (17)  (17)  (17)
Recognized net actuarial loss due to special termination benefit     85    
Recognized net actuarial loss  355   370   398 
          
Net periodic pension cost $973  $1,103  $1,076 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009 
   (PERCENTAGES) 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:

   

Discount rate

   5.25  5.75

Salary scale

   2.50    2.50  

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST:

    

Service cost

  $1,097   $1,021   $926  

Interest cost

   1,186    1,058    937  

Expected return on plan assets

   (1,467  (1,234  (1,232

Amortization of prior year service cost

   15    11    4  

Amortization of transition asset

   (17  (17  (17

Recognized net actuarial loss

   706    555    355  
             

Net periodic pension cost

  $1,520   $1,394   $973  
             

The estimated net loss, prior service cost and transition asset for the defined benefit pension plan that will be will amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost over the next year are $475,000, $11,000,$811,000, $7,000, and $(17,000)($17,000), respectively.

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 20062008 were as follows:

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (PERCENTAGES) 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:            
Discount rate  6.00%  6.00%  6.00%
Expected return on plan assets  8.00   8.00   8.00 
Rate of compensation increase  2.50   2.50   2.50 

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (PERCENTAGES) 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:

    

Discount rate

   5.75  6.25  6.00

Expected return on plan assets

   8.00    8.00    8.00  

Rate of compensation increase

   2.50    2.50    2.50  

The Company has assumed an 8% long-term expected return on plan assets. This assumption was based upon the plan’s historical investment performance over a longer-term period of 15 years combined with the plan’s investment objective of balanced growth and income. Additionally, this assumption also incorporates a targeted range for equity securities of 50% toapproximately 60% of plan assets.

PLAN ASSETS:

The plan’s measurement date is December 31, 2008.2010. This plan’s asset allocations at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, by asset category are as follows:

         
ASSET CATEGORY: 2008 2007
Equity securities  17%  59%
Debt securities and short-term investments  83   41 
         
Total  100%  100%
         

   2010  2009 
   (PERCENTAGES) 

ASSET CATEGORY:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

   %   6

Domestic equities

   9    12  

Mutual funds/ETFs

   78    73  

Agencies

   1    3  

Corporate bonds

   12    6  
         

Total

   100%   100
         

The major categories of assets in the Company’s Pension Plan as of year end is presented in the following table. Assets are segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy established by ASC Topic 820 utilized to measure fair value.

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Level 1:

  

Cash and cash equivalents

  $    $854  

Domestic equities

   1,550     1,911  

Mutual funds/ETFs

   13,909     11,245  

Level 2:

    

Agencies

   252     524  

Corporate bonds

   2,038     945  
          

Total fair value of plan assets

  $17,749    $15,479  
          

Cash and cash equivalents may include uninvested cash balances along with money market mutual funds, treasury bills, or other assets normally categorized as cash equivalents. Domestic equities may include common or preferred stocks, covered options, rights or warrants, or ADRs which are traded on any U.S. equity market. Mutual funds/ETFs may include any equity, fixed income, balanced, international, or global mutual fund or exchange traded fund including any propriety fund managed by the Trust Company. Agencies may include any U.S. government agency security or asset-backed security. Collective investment funds may include equity, fixed income, or balanced collective investment funds managed by the Trust Company. Corporate bonds may include any corporate bond or note.

The investment strategy objective for the pension plan is a balance of growth and income. This objective seeks to develop a portfolio for acceptable levels of current income together with the opportunity for capital appreciation. The balanced growth and income objective reflects a relatively equal balance between equity and fixed income investments such as debt securities. The allocation between equity and fixed income assets may vary by a moderate degree but the plan typically targets a range of equity investments between 50% and 60% of the plan assets. This means that fixed income and cash investments typically approximate 40% to 50% of the plan assets. The investment manager deviated from this targeted range due to the volatility experienced in the equity markets in 2008. The plan is also able to invest in ASRV common stock up to a maximum level of 10% of the market value of the plan assets (at December 31, 2008, 2.7%2010, 1.9% of the plan assets were invested in ASRV common stock). This asset mix is intended to ensure that there is a steady stream of cash from maturing investments to fund benefit payments.

57


CASH FLOWS:

The BankCompany presently expects that the contribution to be made to the Plan in 20092011 will be comparable with recent years of approximately $1.5 million.

ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS:

The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands).

     
2009 $1,497 
2010  1,884 
2011  1,992 
2012  2,002 
2013  2,244 
Years 2014—2018  10,964 

2011

  $1,967  

2012

   1,941  

2013

   2,083  

2014

   2,140  

2015

   2,100  

Years 2016 — 2020

   11,098  

401(k) PLAN:

The BankCompany maintains a qualified 401(k) plan that allows for participation by BankCompany employees. Under the plan, employees may elect to make voluntary, pretax contributions to their accounts, and the BankCompany contributes 4% of salaries for union members who are in the plan. Contributions by the BankCompany charged to operations were $226,000$208,000 and $218,000$206,000 for the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively. The fair value of plan assets includes $266,000$257,000 pertaining to the value of the Company’s common stock and Trust Preferred securities that isare held by the plan at December 31, 2008.

2010.

Except for the above benefit plans, the Company has no significant additional exposure for any other post-retirement or post-employment benefits.

15. LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company’s obligation for future minimum lease payments on operating leases at December 31, 2008,2010, is as follows:

     
  FUTURE MINIMUM
  LEASE PAYMENTS
YEAR  (IN THOUSANDS)
2009 $613 
2010  514 
2011  431 
2012  256 
2013  172 
2014 and thereafter  391 

YEAR

  FUTURE MINIMUM
LEASE PAYMENTS
 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

2011

  $959  

2012

   745  

2013

   592  

2014

   468  

2015

   480  

2016 and thereafter

   2,704  

In addition to the amounts set forth above, certain of the leases require payments by the Company for taxes, insurance, and maintenance. Rent expense included in total non-interest expense amounted to $502,000, $567,000 and $514,000, $492,000in 2010, 2009, and $423,000, in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The BankCompany incurs off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These risks derive from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments and standby letters of credit involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are obligations to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the loan agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The BankCompany evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Collateral which secures these types of commitments is the same as for other types of secured lending such as accounts receivable, inventory, and fixed assets.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the BankCompany to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including normal business activities, bond financings, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Letters of credit are issued both on an unsecured and secured basis. Collateral securing these types of transactions is similar to collateral securing the Bank’sCompany’s commercial loans.

58


The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts. The Bank

Company uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending. At December 31, 20082010 the Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating $112,192,000$84,879,000 and standby letters of credit of $13,064,000,$11,548,000, compared to commitments to extend credit of $93,583,000$99,275,000 and standby letters of credit of $7,884,000$11,695,000 at December 31, 2007.2009. Standby letters of credit had terms ranging from 1 to 4 years.2 years with annual extension options available. Standby letters of credit of approximately $10.1$5.5 million were secured as of December 31, 20082010 and approximately $5.1$10.2 million at December 31, 2007.2009. The carrying amount of the liability for AmeriServ obligations related to unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit was $492,000$875,000 at December 31, 20082010 and $398,000$704,000 at December 31, 2007.

2009.

Pursuant to its bylaws, the Company provides indemnification to its directors and officers against certain liabilities incurred as a result of their service on behalf of the Company. In connection with this indemnification obligation, the Company can advance on behalf of covered individuals costs incurred in defending against certain claims. Additionally, the Company is also subject to a number of asserted and unasserted potential claims encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of the Company, neither the resolution of these claims nor the funding of these credit commitments will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

17. PREFERRED STOCK

On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (initially introduced as the Troubled Asset Relief Program or “TARP”(“TARP”) was enacted. On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced its intention to inject capital into financial institutions under the TARP Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”). The CPP is a voluntary program designed to provide capital to healthy, well managed financial institutions in order to increase the availability of credit to businesses and individuals and help stabilize the U.S. financial system.

On December 19, 2008, the Company sold to the U.S. Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $21 million in cash 21,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D. In conjunction with the purchase of these senior preferred shares, the U.S. Treasury also received a warrant to purchase up to 1,312,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrant has a term of 10 years and is exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $2.40 per share. The $21 million in proceeds was allocated to the Series D Preferred Stock and the warrant based on their relative fair values at issuance (approximately $20.4 million was allocated to the Series D Preferred Stock and approximately $600,000 to the warrant). The difference between the initial value allocated to the Series D Preferred Stock of approximately $20.4 million and the liquidation value of $21 million will be charged to surplusretained earnings over the first threefive years of the contract. Cumulative dividends on Series D Preferred Stock are payable quarterly at 5% through December 19, 2013 and at a rate of 9% thereafter. As a result of the decision by the Company to accept a preferred stock investment under the U.S. Treasury’s CPP for a period of three years the Company is no longer permitted to repurchase stock or declare and pay dividends on common stock without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.

18. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

     On January 1, 2006,

The Company uses the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #123(R) “Share-Based Payment” using the “modified perspective” method. Under thismodified perspective method awards that are granted, modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are measuredfor accounting for stock-based compensation and accounted for in accordance with FAS #123(R). As a result of this adoption the Company recognized $7,000$18,000 of pretax compensation expense for the year 2008, $12,0002010, $11,000 in 20072009 and $56,000$7,000 in 2006.

2008.

In 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a shareholder approved Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) authorizing the grant of options or restricted stock covering 800,000 shares of common stock. This Plan replaced the expired 1991 Stock Option Plan. Under the Plan, options or restricted stock can be granted (the Grant Date) to directors, officers, and employees that provide services to the Company and its affiliates, as selected by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The option price at which a stock option may be exercised shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share of common stock on the Grant Date. The maximum term of any option granted under the Plan cannot exceed 10 years. Generally, under the Plan on or after the first

anniversary of the Grant Date, one-third of such options may be exercised. On or after the second anniversary of the Grant Date, two-thirds of such options may be exercised minus the aggregate number of such options previously exercised. On or after the third anniversary of the Grant Date, the remainder of the options may be exercised.

59


A summary of the status of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan at December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, and 2006,2008, and changes during the years then ended is presented in the table and narrative following:
                         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
      WEIGHTED     WEIGHTED     WEIGHTED
      AVERAGE     AVERAGE     AVERAGE
      EXERCISE     EXERCISE     EXERCISE
  SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
Outstanding at beginning of year  228,392  $5.09   247,208  $5.03   372,645  $5.33 
Granted  21,217   2.86   900   4.60   1,233   4.70 
Exercised        (5,834)  2.71   (21,667)  3.21 
Forfeited  (17,600)  4.86   (13,882)  5.02   (105,003)  6.46 
                         
Outstanding at end of year  232,009   4.90   228,392   5.09   247,208   5.03 
                         
Exercisable at end of year  217,564   5.04   227,381   5.09   223,314   4.93 
Weighted average fair value of options granted in current year     $1.39      $2.59      $2.69 

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
   2010   2009   2008 
   SHARES  WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE
   SHARES  WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE
   SHARES  WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

   293,609   $4.23     232,009   $4.90     228,392   $5.09  

Granted

   105,041    1.78     69,100    1.69     21,217    2.86  

Exercised

                           

Forfeited

   (141,363  4.31     (7,500  1.77     (17,600  4.86  
                  

Outstanding at end of year

   257,287    3.18     293,609    4.23     232,009    4.90  
                  

Exercisable at end of year

   118,571    4.79     245,469    4.69     217,564    5.04  

Weighted average fair value of options granted in current year

   $0.39     $0.37     $1.39  

A total of 217,564118,571 of the 232,009257,287 options outstanding at December 31, 2008,2010, have exercise prices between $2.31$1.68 and $6.10, with a weighted average exercise price of $5.04$4.79 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.31 years. Options outstanding at December 31, 2008 reflect option ranges of: $2.31 to $3.49 totaling 14,572 options which have a weighted average exercise price of $2.78 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 6.55 years; and $4.02 to $6.10 totaling 202,992 options which have a weighted average exercise price of $5.20 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.074.14 years. All of these options are exercisable. The remaining 14,445138,716 options that are not yet exercisable have exercise prices between $2.85$1.53 and $4.60,$3.01, with a weighted average exercise price of $2.90$1.82 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.229.07 years. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009, and 2006.

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
BLACK-SCHOLES ASSUMPTION RANGES            
             
Risk-free interest rate 2.76-3.34% 4.52% 4.70%
Expected lives in years 10 10 10
Expected volatility 33.28% 36.84% 37.22%
Expected dividend rate 0% 0% 0%
2008.

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
BLACK-SCHOLES ASSUMPTION RANGES  2010 2009 2008

Risk-free interest rate

  3.21-3.83% 2.83-3.47% 2.76-3.34%

Expected lives in years

  10 10 10

Expected volatility

  34.60-35.74% 33.67-34.09% 33.28%

Expected dividend rate

  0% 0% 0%

19. DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND COMMON STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan) provides each record holder of Common Stock with a simple and convenient method of purchasing additional shares without payment of any brokerage commissions, service charges or other similar expense. A participant in the Purchase Plan may purchase shares of Common Stock by electing either to (1) reinvest dividends on all of his or her shares of Common Stock (if applicable) or (2) make optional cash payments of not less than $10 and up to a maximum of $2,000 per month and continue to receive regular dividend payments on his or her other shares. A participant may withdraw from the Purchase Plan at any time.

In the case of purchases from AmeriServ Financial, Inc. of treasury or newly-issued shares of Common Stock, the average market price is determined by averaging the high and low sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ on the relevant investment date. At December 31, 2008,During 2010, the Company issued 37,5342,033 shares and at December 31, 2010 had 48,0003,355 unissued reserved shares available under the Purchase Plan. In the case of

purchases of shares of Common Stock on the open market, the average market price will be the weighted average purchase price of shares purchased for the Purchase Plan in the market for the relevant investment date.

20. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company’s consolidated balance sheet showsConsolidated Balance Sheets show both tangible assets (such as loans, buildings, and investments) and intangible assets (such as goodwill and core deposits). Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Instead such intangibles are evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually. Any resulting impairment would be reflected as a non-interest expense. Of the Company’s goodwill of $13.5$13.0 million, $9.5 million is allocated to the retail banking segment and $4$3.5 million relates to the West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA) acquisition which is included in the trust segment. Goodwill in both of these segments was evaluated for impairment on its annual impairment evaluation date. The result of these evaluations indicated that the Company’s goodwill had no impairment. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company did reduce the goodwill allocated to West Chester Capital Advisors by $547,000. This reduction resulted from a purchase price adjustment as the principals of WCCA did not fully earn a deferred contingent payment that had been accrued for at the time of acquisition. The Company’s only intangible asset, other than goodwill, iswas its core deposit intangible, which has a remaining finite life of approximately two months.

60

fully amortized in 2009.


     As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s core deposit intangibles had an original cost of $17.6 million with accumulated amortization of $17.5 million. The weighted average amortization period of the Company’s core deposit intangibles at December 31, 2008, is two months. Estimated amortization expense for 2009 is $108,000.
A reconciliation of the Company’s intangible asset balances for 20082010 and 20072009 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2008  2007 
  CORE DEPOSIT    
  INTANGIBLES  GOODWILL 
Balance January 1 $973  $1,838  $13,497  $9,544 
Addition due to WCCA           3,953 
Amortization expense  (865)  (865)      
             
Balance December 31 $108  $973  $13,497  $13,497 
             

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009  2010   2009 
   CORE
DEPOSIT
INTANGIBLES
  GOODWILL 

Balance January 1

  $    $108   $12,950    $13,497  

Reduction from purchase price adjustment of WCCA

                 (547

Amortization expense

        (108         
                   

Balance December 31

  $    $   $12,950    $12,950  
                   

21. DERIVATIVE HEDGING INSTRUMENTS

The Company can use various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. The Company can use derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk and match the rates on certain assets by hedging the fair value of certain fixed rate debt, which converts the debt to variable rates and by hedging the cash flow variability associated with certain variable rate debt by converting the debt to fixed rates.

To accommodate a customer need and support the Company’s asset/liability positioning, we entered into an interest rate swap with the customer and Pittsburgh National Bank (PNC) in the fourth quarter of 2008. This arrangement involves the exchange of interest payments based on the notional amounts. The Company entered into a floating rate loan and a fixed rate swap with our customer. Simultaneously, the Company entered into an offsetting fixed rate swap with PNC. In connection with each swap transaction, the Company agrees to pay interest to the customer on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the customer on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, the Company agrees to pay PNC the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. This transaction allows the Company’s customer to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. Because the Company acts as an intermediary for its customer, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts offset each other and do not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations. The $144,000 fee the Company received on the transaction is being amortized into income over the term of the swap.

The following table summarizes the interest rate swap transactions that impacted the Company’s 20082010 performance:

                             
                          INCREASE 
                          (DECREASE) IN 
  MATURITY      NOTIONAL  RATE  RATE  REPRICING  INTEREST 
START DATE DATE  HEDGE TYPE  AMOUNT  RECEIVED  PAID  FREQUENCY  EXPENSE 
12/12/08  12/24/13  FAIR VALUE $9,000,000   5.25%  4.40% MONTHLY $4,250 
12/12/08  12/24/13  FAIR VALUE  9,000,000   4.40   5.25  MONTHLY  (4,250)
                            
                          $ 
                            

START DATE

  MATURITY
DATE
   HEDGE TYPE   NOTIONAL
AMOUNT
   RATE
RECEIVED
  RATE
PAID
  REPRICING
FREQUENCY
   INCREASE
(DECREASE)  IN
INTEREST

EXPENSE
 

12/12/08

   12/24/13     FAIR VALUE    $9,000,000     5.25  2.78  MONTHLY    $227,582  

12/12/08

   12/24/13     FAIR VALUE     9,000,000     2.78    5.25    MONTHLY     (227,582
               
            $  
               

The Company monitors and controls all derivative products with a comprehensive Board of Director approved hedging policy. This policy permits a total maximum notional amount outstanding of $500 million for interest rate swaps, interest rate caps/floors, and swaptions. All hedge transactions must be approved in advance by the Investment Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) of the Board of Directors. The Company had no interest rate swaps, caps or floors outstanding at December 31, 2007.

22. SEGMENT RESULTS

The financial performance of the Company is also monitored by an internal funds transfer pricing profitability measurement system which produces line of business results and key performance measures. The Company’s major business units include retail banking, commercial lending, trust, and investment/parent. The reported results reflect the underlying economics of the business segments. Expenses for centrally provided services are allocated based upon the cost and estimated usage of those services. The businesses are match-funded and interest rate risk is centrally managed and accounted for within the investment/parent business segment. The key performance measure the Company focuses on for each business segment is net income contribution.

Retail banking includes the deposit-gathering branch franchise, lending to both individuals and small businesses, and financial services. Lending activities include residential mortgage loans, direct consumer loans, and small business commercial loans. Financial services include the sale of mutual funds, annuities, and insurance products. Commercial lending to businesses includes commercial

61


loans, and commercial real-estate loans. The trust segment has two primary business divisions, traditional trustcontains our wealth management businesses which include the Trust company and union collectiveWest Chester Capital Advisors, our registered investment funds. Traditional trustadvisory firm. Wealth management includes personal trust products and services such as personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts. Also, institutional trust products and services such as 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, and individual retirement accounts are included in this segment. The Wealth management businesses also includes the union collective investment funds, namely the ERECT and BUILD Fundsfunds which are designed to investuse union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor. The financial results of WCCA, an investment advisory firm, have been incorporated into the trust segment beginning March 7, 2007. The investment/parent includes the net results of investment securities and borrowing activities, general corporate expenses not allocated to the business segments, interest expense on guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and centralized interest rate risk management. Inter-segment revenues were not material.

The contribution of the major business segments to the consolidated results of operations were as follows:

                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 
      COMMERCIAL      INVESTMENT/    
  RETAIL BANKING  LENDING  TRUST  PARENT  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Net interest income $17,373  $10,328  $85  $1,331  $29,117 
Provision for loan loss  585   2,340         2,925 
Non-interest income  8,253   865   7,511   (205)  16,424 
Non-interest expense  21,610   5,849   5,694   2,484   35,637 
                
Income (loss) before income taxes  3,431   3,004   1,902   (1,358)  6,979 
Income taxes (benefit)  691   705   649   (575)  1,470 
                
Net income (loss) $2,740  $2,299  $1,253  $(783) $5,509 
                
Total assets $350,864  $470,084  $3,306  $142,675  $966,929 
                
                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 
      COMMERCIAL      INVESTMENT/    
  RETAIL BANKING  LENDING  TRUST  PARENT  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Net interest income $18,207  $9,199  $159  $(3,342) $24,223 
Provision for loan loss  60   240         300 
Non-interest income  6,312   588   7,728   79   14,707 
Non-interest expense  21,932   5,463   5,155   2,122   34,672 
                
Income (loss) before income taxes  2,527   4,084   2,732   (5,385)  3,958 
Income taxes (benefit)  548   892   935   (1,451)  924 
                
Net income (loss) $1,979  $3,192  $1,797  $(3,934) $3,034 
                
Total assets $336,291  $402,222  $2,891  $163,474  $904,878 
                
                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 
      COMMERCIAL      INVESTMENT/    
  RETAIL BANKING  LENDING  TRUST  PARENT  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Net interest income $18,822  $7,328  $343  $(2,015) $24,478 
Provision for loan loss  (34)  (91)        (125)
Non-interest income  5,732   540   6,521   48   12,841 
Non-interest expense  23,120   4,735   4,291   2,546   34,692 
                
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,468   3,224   2,573   (4,513)  2,752 
Income taxes (benefit)  265   626   875   (1,346)  420 
                
Net income (loss) $1,203  $2,598  $1,698  $(3,167) $2,332 
                
Total assets $357,083  $331,849  $2,716  $204,344  $895,992 
                

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   RETAIL
BANKING
   COMMERCIAL
LENDING
  TRUST   INVESTMENT/
PARENT
  TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Net interest income

  $18,940    $12,252   $60    $1,090   $32,342  

Provision for loan loss

   268     4,982             5,250  

Non-interest income

   6,875     663    6,286     143    13,967  

Non-interest expense

   23,906     7,463    6,013     2,315    39,697  
                       

Income (loss) before income taxes

   1,641     470    333     (1,082  1,362  

Income taxes (benefit)

   379     (27  111     (383  80  
                       

Net income (loss)

  $1,262    $497   $222    $(699 $1,282  
                       

Total assets

  $317,210    $455,609   $3,520    $172,635   $948,974  
                       

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   RETAIL
BANKING
   COMMERCIAL
LENDING
  TRUST   INVESTMENT/
PARENT
   TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Net interest income

  $18,057    $11,924   $68    $2,385    $32,434  

Provision for loan loss

   523     14,627              15,150  

Non-interest income

   6,872     628    6,299     129     13,928  

Non-interest expense

   23,202     7,694    6,141     2,120     39,157  
                        

Income (loss) before income taxes

   1,204     (9,769  226     394     (7,945

Income taxes (benefit)

   256     (3,399  78     15     (3,050
                        

Net income (loss)

  $948    $(6,370 $148    $379    $(4,895
                        

Total assets

  $323,053    $500,552   $3,538    $142,883    $970,026  
                        

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 
   RETAIL
BANKING
   COMMERCIAL
LENDING
   TRUST   INVESTMENT/
PARENT
  TOTAL 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

Net interest income

  $17,373    $10,328    $85    $1,331   $29,117  

Provision for loan loss

   585     2,340              2,925  

Non-interest income

   8,253     865     7,511     (205  16,424  

Non-interest expense

   21,610     5,849     5,694     2,484    35,637  
                        

Income (loss) before income taxes

   3,431     3,004     1,902     (1,358  6,979  

Income taxes (benefit)

   691     705     649     (575  1,470  
                        

Net income (loss)

  $2,740    $2,299    $1,253    $(783 $5,509  
                        

Total assets

  $350,864    $470,084    $3,306    $142,675   $966,929  
                        

23. REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Company is subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and

possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

62


Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier I capital to average assets. As of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, the Federal Reserve categorized the Company as Well Capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The Company believes that no conditions or events have occurred that would change this conclusion. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table.
                         
  AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008
                  TO BE WELL
          FOR CAPITAL CAPITALIZED UNDER
          ADEQUACY PROMPT CORRECTIVE
  ACTUAL PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS
  AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated $120,035   15.90% $60,377   8.00% $75,472   10.00%
AmeriServ Financial Bank  92,333   12.56   58,813   8.00   73,517   10.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated  110,633   14.66   30,189   4.00   45,283   6.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,143   11.31   29,407   4.00   44,110   6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)                        
Consolidated  110,633   12.15   36,414   4.00   45,518   5.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,143   9.30   35,751   4.00   44,688   5.00 
                         
  AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007
                  TO BE WELL
          FOR CAPITAL CAPITALIZED UNDER
          ADEQUACY PROMPT CORRECTIVE
  ACTUAL PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS
  AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated $92,404   13.94% $53,017   8.00% $66,271   10.00%
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,612   12.75   52,458   8.00   65,573   10.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated  84,754   12.79   26,508   4.00   39,762   6.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  75,962   11.58   26,229   4.00   39,344   6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)                        
Consolidated  84,754   9.74   34,811   4.00   43,514   5.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  75,962   8.84   34,391   4.00   42,989   5.00 
24. WEST CHESTER CAPITAL ADVISORS ACQUISITION
     The Company completed Additionally, while not a regulatory capital ratio, the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA) of West Chester, Pennsylvania on March 7, 2007. WCCA is registered investment advisor formed in 1994Company’s tangible common equity ratio was 7.94% and at December 31, 2008 had $82 million in assets under management. WCCA is a wholly owned subsidiary of AmeriServ Financial Bank.
     Because the acquisition was a cash transaction, the Company did not issue any stock to execute the purchase. Therefore, there was no ownership dilution to AmeriServ stockholders. The purchase price paid by AmeriServ Financial Bank to the Sellers7.71% for all the capital stock of WCCA was $4,000,000. This amount consisted of: (a) $2,200,000 paid at closing in immediately available funds,2010 and (b) a deferred payment of up to $1,800,000 to be paid as follows: (A) up to $1,000,000 payable 30 months after closing, and (B) up to $800,000 payable 48 months after closing, in each case, subject to proportionate reduction if revenues of WCCA as of those dates is less than $1,360,000.

63

2009, respectively.


   AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 
   ACTUAL  FOR CAPITAL
ADEQUACY
PURPOSES
  TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTION PROVISIONS
 
   AMOUNT   RATIO  AMOUNT   RATIO  AMOUNT   RATIO 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS) 

Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated

  $113,954     16.54 $55,118     8.00 $68,898     10.00

AmeriServ Financial Bank

   92,172     13.57    54,333     8.00    67,916     10.00  

Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated

   105,193     15.27    27,559     4.00    41,339     6.00  

AmeriServ Financial Bank

   83,533     12.30    27,166     4.00    40,749     6.00  

Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets) Consolidated

   105,193     11.20    37,555     4.00    46,944     5.00  

AmeriServ Financial Bank

   83,533     9.13    36,588     4.00    45,735     5.00  

   AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 
   ACTUAL  FOR CAPITAL
ADEQUACY
PURPOSES
  TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTION PROVISIONS
 
   AMOUNT   RATIO  AMOUNT   RATIO  AMOUNT   RATIO 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS) 

Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated

  $113,166     15.33 $59,072     8.00 $73,840     10.00

AmeriServ Financial Bank

   88,524     12.15    58,297     8.00    72,871     10.00  

Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated

   103,798     14.06    29,536     4.00    44,304     6.00  

AmeriServ Financial Bank

   79,276     10.88    29,148     4.00    43,722     6.00  

Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets) Consolidated

   103,798     11.06    37,528     4.00    46,911     5.00  

AmeriServ Financial Bank

   79,276     8.71    36,399     4.00    45,499     5.00  

25.24. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The parent company functions primarily as a coordinating and servicing unit for all subsidiary entities. Provided services include general management, accounting and taxes, loan review, internal auditing, investment advisory, marketing, insurance risk management, general corporate services, and financial and strategic planning. The following financial information relates only to the parent company operations:

BALANCE SHEETS

         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
ASSETS        
Cash $106  $100 
Short-term investments in money market funds  14,202   3,053 
Investment securities available for sale  8,813   1,007 
Equity investment in banking subsidiary  97,434   93,427 
Equity investment in non-banking subsidiaries  4,938   4,720 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture issuance costs  302   318 
Other assets  1,527   1,508 
       
TOTAL ASSETS $127,322  $104,133 
       
         
LIABILITIES        
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures $13,085  $13,085 
Other liabilities  985   754 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES  14,070   13,839 
       
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Total stockholders’ equity  113,252   90,294 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $127,322  $104,133 
       

   AT DECEMBER 31, 
   2010   2009 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

ASSETS

    

Cash

  $100    $102  

Short-term investments in money market funds

   2,632     2,915  

Investment securities available for sale

   13,996     16,943  

Equity investment in banking subsidiary

   97,156     94,225  

Equity investment in non-banking subsidiaries

   4,801     4,840  

Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture issuance costs

   271     287  

Other assets

   2,779     2,119  
          

TOTAL ASSETS

  $121,735    $121,431  
          

LIABILITIES

    

Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures

  $13,085    $13,085  

Other liabilities

   1,592     1,092  
          

TOTAL LIABILITIES

   14,677     14,177  
          

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Total stockholders’ equity

   107,058     107,254  
          

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $121,735    $121,431  
          

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
INCOME            
Inter-entity management and other fees $2,254  $2,363  $2,351 
Dividends from banking subsidiary  6,000       
Dividends from non-banking subsidiaries  1,250   1,580   1,722 
Interest and dividend income  292   167   120 
          
TOTAL INCOME  9,796   4,110   4,193 
          
             
EXPENSE            
Interest expense  1,121   1,121   1,121 
Salaries and employee benefits  2,004   1,910   2,008 
Other expense  1,336   1,223   1,184 
          
TOTAL EXPENSE  4,461   4,254   4,313 
          
             
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES  5,335   (144)  (120)
Benefit for income taxes  651   583   640 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  (477)  2,595   1,812 
          
NET INCOME $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
          

64


   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

INCOME

    

Inter-entity management and other fees

  $2,362   $2,254   $2,254  

Dividends from banking subsidiary

           6,000  

Dividends from non-banking subsidiaries

   205    460    1,250  

Interest and dividend income

   499    625    292  
             

TOTAL INCOME

   3,066    3,339    9,796  
             

EXPENSE

    

Interest expense

   1,121    1,121    1,121  

Salaries and employee benefits

   2,333    2,162    2,004  

Other expense

   1,529    1,441    1,336  
             

TOTAL EXPENSE

   4,983    4,724    4,461  
             

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES

   (1,917  (1,385  5,335  

Benefit for income taxes

   722    627    651  

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   2,477    (4,137  (477
             

NET INCOME (LOSS)

  $1,282   $(4,895 $5,509  
             

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:            
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  477   (2,595)  (1,812)
Other — net  1,176   1,445   1,043 
          
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES  7,162   1,884   1,563 
          
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchase of investment securities — available for sale  (9,720)  (999)  (3,112)
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities — available for sale  2,008   3,053    
Capital contribution to banking subsidiary  (5,000)      
          
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (12,712)  2,054   (3,112)
          
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  99   131   173 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock  21,000       
Treasury stock, purchased at cost  (2,835)      
Common stock dividends paid  (543)      
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures dividends paid  (1,016)  (1,016)  (1,016)
          
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES  16,705   (885)  (843)
          
             
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  11,155   3,053   (2,392)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1  3,153   100   2,492 
          
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31 $14,308  $3,153  $100 
          

   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 
   (IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income (loss)

  $1,282   $(4,895 $5,509  

Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

    

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   (2,477  4,137    477  

Stock compensation expense

   61    73    99  

Other — net

   (107  (462  160  
             

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

   (1,241  (1,147  6,245  
             

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Purchase of investment securities – available for sale

   (4,044  (16,099  (9,720

Proceeds from maturity of investment securities – available for sale

   7,050    7,906    2,008  

Capital contribution to banking subsidiary

   (1,000  (1,000  (5,000
             

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES

   2,006    (9,193  (12,712
             

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock

           21,000  

Treasury stock, purchased at cost

           (2,835

Common stock dividends paid

           (543

Preferred stock dividends paid

   (1,050  (951    
             

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

   (1,050  (951  17,622  
             

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (285  (11,291  11,155  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1

   3,017    14,308    3,153  
             

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31

  $2,732   $3,017   $14,308  
             

The ability of the subsidiary bankBank to upstream cash to the parent company is restricted by regulations. Federal law prevents the parent company from borrowing from its subsidiary bankBank unless the loans are secured by specified assets. Further, such secured loans are limited in amount to ten percent of the subsidiary bank’sBank’s capital and surplus. In addition, the Bank is subject to legal limitations on the amount of dividends that can be paid to its shareholder. The dividend limitation generally restricts dividend payments to a bank’s retained net income for the current and preceding two calendar years. Cash may also be upstreamed to the parent company by the subsidiaries as an inter-entity management fee. At December 31, 2008,2010, the subsidiary bankBank was not permitted to upstream anany additional $3,899,000 in cash dividends to the parent company. The subsidiary bankBank had a combined $102,984,000$97,311,000 of restricted surplus and retained earnings at December 31, 2008.

26.2010.

25. SELECTED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly consolidated financial data regarding the Company:

                 
  2008 QUARTER ENDED 
  DEC. 31  SEPT. 30  JUNE 30  MARCH 31 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
Interest income $12,355  $11,732  $11,450  $12,282 
Interest expense  4,170   4,501   4,484   5,547 
             
Net interest income  8,185   7,231   6,966   6,735 
Provision for loan losses  625   775   1,375   150 
             
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  7,560   6,456   5,591   6,585 
Non-interest income  3,476   3,767   5,343   3,838 
Non-interest expense  9,049   8,784   9,025   8,779 
             
Income before income taxes  1,987   1,439   1,909   1,644 
Provision for income taxes  372   290   393   415 
             
Net income $1,615  $1,149  $1,516  $1,229 
             
Basic earnings per common share  0.07   0.05   0.07   0.06 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.07   0.05   0.07   0.06 
Cash dividends declared per common share  0.025   0.00   0.00   0.00 

65


   2010 QUARTER ENDED 
   DEC. 31   SEPT. 30   JUNE 30   MARCH 31 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 

Interest income

  $10,856    $11,060    $11,450    $11,465  

Interest expense

   2,866     3,037     3,242     3,344  
                    

Net interest income

   7,990     8,023     8,208     8,121  

Provision for loan losses

        1,000     1,200     3,050  
                    

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

   7,990     7,023     7,008     5,071  

Non-interest income

   3,766     3,513     3,388     3,300  

Non-interest expense

   10,373     9,774     9,786     9,764  
                    

Income (loss) before income taxes

   1,383     762     610     (1,393

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   269     153     133     (475
                    

Net income (loss)

  $1,114    $609    $477    $(918
                    

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $0.04    $0.02    $0.01    $(0.06

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

   0.04     0.02     0.01     (0.06

Cash dividends declared per common share

   0.00     0.00     0.00     0.00  

   2009 QUARTER ENDED 
   DEC. 31  SEPT. 30  JUNE 30  MARCH 31 
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 

Interest income

  $11,767   $11,698   $12,055   $11,935  

Interest expense

   3,570    3,773    3,884    3,794  
                 

Net interest income

   8,197    7,925    8,171    8,141  

Provision for loan losses

   3,750    6,300    3,300    1,800  
                 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

   4,447    1,625    4,871    6,341  

Non-interest income

   3,422    3,454    3,491    3,561  

Non-interest expense

   10,793    9,566    9,636    9,162  
                 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   (2,924  (4,487  (1,274  740  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   (1,245  (1,677  (335  207  
                 

Net income (loss)

  $(1,679 $(2,810 $(939 $533  
                 

Basic (loss) earnings per common share

  $(0.09 $(0.15 $(0.06 $0.01  

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share

   (0.09  (0.15  (0.06  0.01  

Cash dividends declared per common share

   0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  

                 
  2007 QUARTER ENDED 
  DEC. 31  SEPT. 30  JUNE 30  MARCH 31 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
Interest income $12,442  $12,454  $12,308  $12,175 
Interest expense  6,209   6,432   6,295   6,220 
             
Net interest income  6,233   6,022   6,013   5,955 
Provision for loan losses  150   150       
             
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  6,083   5,872   6,013   5,955 
Non-interest income  3,860   4,022   3,592   3,233 
Non-interest expense  8,704   8,773   8,522   8,673 
             
Income before income taxes  1,239   1,121   1,083   515 
Provision for income taxes  315   247   275   87 
             
Net income $924  $874  $808  $428 
             
Basic earnings per common share  0.04   0.04   0.04   0.02 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.04   0.04   0.04   0.02 
Cash dividends declared per common share  0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00 

66


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Committee

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008.2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008,2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements.

/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA

March 2, 2009

677, 2011


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit Committee
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
We have audited AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, AmeriServ Financial, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Audit Report of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and our report dated March 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
Wexford, PA
March 2, 2009

68


REPORT ON MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.

We, as management of AmeriServ Financial, Inc., are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

Management assessed the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2010, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2008,2010, its system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”. S.R. Snodgrass A.C., independentThis annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’sregarding internal control over financial reporting.

 Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

/s/ ALLAN R. DENNISONGLENN L. WILSON

 /s/ JEFFREY A. STOPKO
Allan R. DennisonGlenn L. Wilson Jeffrey A. Stopko
President &Senior Vice President &
Chief Executive Officer Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Johnstown, PA

February 19, 2009

6917, 2011


STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

February 19, 2009

17, 2011

To the Stockholders and

Board of Directors of

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

Management of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries have prepared the consolidated financial statements and other information in the Annual Report and Form 10-K in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and are responsible for its accuracy.

In meeting its responsibility, management relies on internal accounting and related control systems, which include selection and training of qualified personnel, establishment and communication of accounting and administrative policies and procedures, appropriate segregation of responsibilities, and programs of internal audit. These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets and that assets are safeguarded against unauthorized use or disposition. Such assurance cannot be absolute because of inherent limitations in any internal control system.

Management also recognizes its responsibility to foster a climate in which Company affairs are conducted with the highest ethical standards. The Company’s Code of Conduct, furnished to each employee and director, addresses the importance of open internal communications, potential conflicts of interest, compliance with applicable laws, including those related to financial disclosure, the confidentiality of proprietary information, and other items. There is an ongoing program to assess compliance with these policies.

The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors consists solely of outside directors. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and the independent auditors to discuss audit, financial reporting, and related matters. S.R. Snodgrass A.C. and the Company’s internal auditors have direct access to the Audit Committee.

/s/ ALLAN R. DENNISONGLENN L. WILSON

 /s/ JEFFREY A. STOPKO
Allan R. DennisonGlenn L. Wilson Jeffrey A. Stopko
President &Senior Vice President &
Chief Executive Officer Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

70


ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
     None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.As of December 31, 2008,2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, on the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008.
2010.

Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed and submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082010 is included in Item 8.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this section relating to Directors of the Registrant is presented in the “Election of ASRV Directors” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this section is presented in the “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Compensation Paid to Executive Officers” sections of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this section is presented in the “Principal Owners” and “Security Ownership of Management” sections of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this section is presented in the “Director Independence and Transactions with Related Parties” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this section is presented in the “Security Ownership of Management”“Independent Registered Accounting Firm” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
     Information required by this section is presented in the “Transactions with Management” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

71


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
     Information required by this section is presented in the “Audit Committee Report” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED:

The consolidated financial statements listed below are from this 20082010 Form 10-K and Part II — Item 8. Page references are to this Form 10-K.

10-K.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets,

36
Consolidated Statements of Operations,37
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,38
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,39
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,

  40  
Notes to

Consolidated Financial Statements of Operations,

  41  

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss),

43

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,

44

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,

45

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,

46

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,

  6785  
Report on Management’s Assessment

Statement of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,Management Responsibility,

  69
Statement of Management Responsibility,7087  

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:

These schedules are not required or are not applicable under Securities and Exchange Commission accounting regulations and therefore have been omitted.

72


EXHIBITS:

EXHIBITS:
The exhibits listed below are filed herewith or to other filings.

EXHIBIT

NUMBER

 

DESCRIPTION

 
EXHIBIT

PRIOR FILING OR EXHIBIT

NUMBERDESCRIPTION

PAGE NUMBER HEREIN

3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended through January 5, 2005.December 23, 2009. Exhibit 3.1 to 2004 Form 10-K8-K Filed on March 10, 2005December 23, 2009
3.2 Bylaws, as amended and restated on January 26, 2005.December 17, 2009. Exhibit 3.2 to January 26, 2005 Form 8-K Filed on January 26, 2005December 23, 2009
3.3 Certificate of Designation of Rights of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D. Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K Filed December 22, 2008
4.1 Warrant, dated December 19, 2008, to Purchasepurchase 1,312,500 shares of common stock, par value $2.50 per share, of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K Filed December 22, 2008
10.1 Agreement, dated February 1, 2004,July 22, 2009, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Allan R. Dennison, as amended on January 24, 2008Glenn L. Wilson 

Exhibit 10.710.1 to 2007 Form 10-K8-K Filed March 6, 2008

July 28, 2009

10.2Agreement, dated May 24, 2002, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Dan L. HummelExhibit 10.8 to 2004 Form 10-K Filed March 10, 2005
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Below
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Below
31.1 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
31.2 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
99.1Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 111(b)(4) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as AmendedBelow
99.2Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 111(b)(4) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as AmendedBelow

73


SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

(Registrant)

By: 

/s/ Glenn L. Wilson

 Glenn L. Wilson
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
(Registrant)
By:  /s/ Allan R. Dennison  
Allan R. Dennison 
 President & CEO

Date: February 19, 2009

March 7, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 19, 2009:

March 7, 2011:

/s/

 /s/ Craig G. Ford

Craig G. Ford

  Chairman
Craig G. FordDirector   
/s/ Allan R. Dennison
Allan R. Dennison

 /s/ Glenn L. Wilson

  President, CEO & Director /s/

 /s/ Jeffrey A. Stopko

EVP & CFO
Glenn L. WilsonJeffrey A. Stopko  SVP & CFO 

/s/ J. Michael Adams, Jr.

J. Michael Adams, Jr.

  Director /s/ Margaret A. O’Malley
Margaret A. O’Malley
Director 
/s/ Edward J. Cernic, Sr.
Edward J. Cernic, Sr.
Director

/s/ Very Rev. Christian R. Oravec

Director
J. Michael Adams, Jr.Very Rev. Christian R. Oravec  Director 

/s/ DanielAllan R. DeVos

Daniel R. DeVos
Dennison

  Director 

/s/ Mark E. Pasquerilla

Director
Allan R. DennisonMark E. Pasquerilla  Director 

/s/ James C. Dewar

James C. Dewar
Daniel R. DeVos

  Director 

/s/ Howard M. Picking, III

Director
Daniel R. DeVosHoward M. Picking, III  Director 

/s/ James C. Dewar

Director

/s/ Sara A. Sargent

Director
James C. DewarSara A. Sargent

/s/ Bruce E. Duke, III

Director

/s/ Thomas C. Slater

Director
Bruce E. Duke, IIIThomas C. Slater

/s/ James M. Edwards, Sr.

Director

/s/ Robert L. Wise

Director
James M. Edwards, Sr.Robert L. Wise

/s/ Kim W. Kunkle

Director
Kim W. Kunkle

/s/ Margaret A. O’Malley

Director
Margaret A. O’Malley

AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.

AMERISERV FINANCIAL

BANK OFFICE LOCATIONS

REMOTE ATM

BANKING LOCATIONS

*

Main Office Downtown

216 Franklin Street

PO Box 520

Johnstown, PA 15907-0520 1-800-837-BANK (2265)

*

Seward Office

1 Roadway Plaza 6858 Route 711 Suite One

Seward, PA 15954-9501

East Hills Drive-up,
1213 Scalp Avenue, Johnstown

Main Office, 216 Franklin Street, Johnstown

†*

Westmont Office

110 Plaza Drive

Johnstown, PA 15905-1211

*

Windber Office

1501 Somerset Avenue

Windber, PA 15963-1745

The Galleria, Johnstown

Goga’s Service Station,

Cairnbrook

†*

University Heights Office

1404 Eisenhower Boulevard Johnstown, PA 15904-3218

Central City Office

104 Sunshine Avenue

Central City, PA 15926-1129

AMERISERV RESIDENTIAL

LENDING LOCATIONS

*

Eighth Ward Office

1059 Franklin Street

Johnstown, PA 15905-4303

*

Somerset Office

108 W. Main Street

Somerset, PA 15501-2035

Main Office Downtown

216 Franklin Street

PO Box 520

Johnstown, PA 15907-0520

*

West End Office

163 Fairfield Avenue

Johnstown, PA 15906-2347

*

Derry Office

112 South Chestnut Street

Derry, PA 15627-1938

Altoona Office

87 Logan Boulevard

Altoona, PA 16602-3123

*

Carrolltown Office

101 South Main Street

Carrolltown, PA 15722-0507

*

South Atherton Office

734 South Atherton Street State College, PA 16801-4628

Pittsburgh Loan Center

300 Penn Center Boulevard

Suite 402

Pittsburgh, PA 15235-5507

*

Northern Cambria Office

4206 Crawford Avenue Suite 1 Northern Cambria, PA 15714-1342

*

Pittsburgh Office

60 Boulevard of the Allies

Suite 100

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-1232

†*

Lovell Park Office

179 Lovell Avenue

Ebensburg, PA 15931-0418

*

North Atherton Office

1857 N. Atherton Street

State College, PA 16803-1521

*

Nanty Glo Office

1383 Shoemaker Street

Nanty Glo, PA 15943-1254

*=

†=

24-Hour ATM Banking

Available

Seven Day a Week Banking Available

†*

Galleria Mall Office

500 Galleria Drive Suite 100

Johnstown, PA 15904-8911

   
/s/ Bruce E. Duke, III
Bruce E. Duke, III, M.D.
Director/s/ Sara A. Sargent
Sara A. Sargent
Director 
/s/ James M. Edwards, Sr.
James M. Edwards, Sr.
Director/s/ Thomas C. Slater
Thomas C. Slater
Director 
/s/ Kim W. Kunkle
Kim W. Kunkle
Director/s/ Nedret Vidinli
Nedret Vidinli
Director 
/s/ Robert L. Wise
Robert L. Wise
Director 

74


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
AMERISERV FINANCIAL
REMOTE ATM
BANK OFFICE LOCATIONS
BANKING LOCATIONS

*   Main Office Downtown
     216 Franklin Street
     PO Box 520
     Johnstown, PA 15907-0520
     1-800-837-BANK (2265)
†* Westmont Office
     110 Plaza Drive
     Johnstown, PA 15905-1211
†* University Heights Office
     1404 Eisenhower Boulevard
     Johnstown, PA 15904-3218
*   Eighth Ward Office
     1059 Franklin Street
     Johnstown, PA 15905-4303
*   West End Office
     163 Fairfield Avenue
     Johnstown, PA 15906-2347
*   Carrolltown Office
     101 South Main Street
     Carrolltown, PA 15722-0507
*   Northern Cambria Office
     4206 Crawford Avenue Suite 1
     Northern Cambria, PA 15714-1342
†* Lovell Park Office
     179 Lovell Avenue
     Ebensburg, PA 15931-0418
*   Nanty Glo Office
     1383 Shoemaker Street
     Nanty Glo, PA 15943-1254
†* Galleria Mall Office
     500 Galleria Drive Suite 100
     Johnstown, PA 15904-8911
*  Seward Office
     1 Roadway Plaza
     6858 Route 711 Suite One
     Seward, PA 15954-9501
*   Windber Office
     1501 Somerset Avenue
     Windber, PA 15963-1745
     Central City Office
     104 Sunshine Avenue
     Central City, PA 15926-1129
*   Somerset Office
     108 W. Main Street
     Somerset, PA 15501-2035
*   Derry Office
     112 South Chestnut Street
     Derry, PA 15627-1938
*   South Atherton Office
     734 South Atherton Street
     State College, PA 16801-4628
*   Pittsburgh Office
     60 Boulevard of the Allies
     Suite 100
     Pittsburgh, PA 15222-1232
*   Benner Pike Office
     763 Benner Pike
     State College, PA 16801-7313
* = 24-Hour ATM Banking
      Available
†= Seven Day a Week Banking
     Available
East Hills Drive-up,
1213 Scalp Avenue, Johnstown
Main Office, 216 Franklin Street,
     Johnstown
The Galleria, Johnstown
Goga’s Service Station, Cairnbrook
AMERISERV RESIDENTIAL
LENDING LOCATIONS
Main Office Downtown
216 Franklin Street
PO Box 520
Johnstown, PA 15907-0520
Altoona Office
87 Logan Boulevard
Altoona, PA 16602-3123
Mt. Nittany Mortgage Company
2300 South Atherton Street
State College, PA 16801-7613
Pittsburgh Loan Center
300 Penn Center Boulevard
Suite 613
Pittsburgh, PA 15235-5507


75


SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

SECURITIES MARKETS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. Common Stock is publicly traded and quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System. The common stock is traded under the symbol of “ASRV.” The listed market makers for the stock are:

Citigroup SmithBarney
969

Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

919 Third Avenue

6th Floor

New York, NY 10022

Telephone: (800) 635-6860

Stifel Nicolaus

1407 Eisenhower Boulevard
Oak Ridge East

Johnstown, PA 15904
Telephone: (814) 266-7900

Stifel Nicolaus
18 Columbia Turnpike
Florham Park, NJ 07932-2290
Telephone: (973) 549-4217
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
1407 Eisenhower Boulevard
Johnstown, PA 15904

Telephone: (814) 269-9211

Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc.

787 Seventh Avenue

Equitable Bldg — 4th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Telephone: (800) 966-1559

Knight Capital Group, Inc.

545 Washington Boulevard

Jersey City, NJ 07310

Telephone: (800) 544-7508

Janney Montgomery Scott, LLC

1801 Market Street, 8th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103-1675

Telephone: (215) 665-6000

Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.
919 Third Avenue
6th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (800) 635-6860


CORPORATE OFFICES

The corporate offices of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. are located at 216 Franklin Street, Johnstown, PA 15901. Mailing address:

P.O. Box 430

Johnstown, PA 15907-0430

(814) 533-5300

AGENTS

The transfer agent and registrar for AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s common stock is:

Computershare Investor Services

P O Box 43078

Providence, RI 02940-3078

Shareholder Inquiries: 1-800-730-4001

Internet Address:http://www.Computershare.comwww. Computershare.com

INFORMATION

Analysts, investors, shareholders, and others seeking financial data about AmeriServ Financial, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries’ annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements, 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, and call reports — are asked to contact Jeffrey A. Stopko, SeniorExecutive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer at (814) 533-5310 or by e-mail atJStopko@AMERISERVFINANCIAL.comJStopko@AmeriServ.com. The Company also maintains a website (www.AmeriServFinancial.comwww.AmeriServ.com) that makes available, free of charge, such reports and proxy statements and other current financial information, such as press releases and SEC documents, as well as the corporate governance documents under the Investor Relations tab on the Company’s website.

Information contained on the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

76

93