- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM_______________
Form 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996
[ ]1997
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-63115Commission File No. 0-9092
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 95-4352386
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1200 SMITH ST. SUITE 1710 77002-4312
HOUSTON, TEXAS (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES)(Zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 659-1361
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK, $0.03$ 0.003 PAR VALUE
(TITLE OF CLASS)(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by sectionSection 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports)report(s), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ].[_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ][_]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was approximately $19,446,458$ 26,572,965 as of November 22, 1996.
10,624,794October 1, 1997.
14,357,866 shares of the registrant's Common Stock were outstanding as of
November 22, 1996.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------October 1, 1997.
Documents incorporated by reference: The 1997 Proxy Statement of the
registrant is incorporated herein by reference.
================================================================================
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-K
PAGE
----
PART I
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties.................................... 3
Item 3. Legal Proceedings................................................. 14
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............... 14
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder
Matters........................................................... 15
Item 6. Selected Financial Data........................................... 15
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations............................................. 16
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data....................... 18
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.............................................. 30
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............... 30
Item 11. Executive Compensation........................................... 31
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management... 33
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................... 33
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statements and Reports on Form
8-K.............................................................. 34
SIGNATURES................................................................PART I
Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties..................................... 3
Item 3. Legal Proceedings................................................... 12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders................. 12
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters............................................................. 13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data............................................. 14
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations........................................... 14
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data......................... 17
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure............................................ 33
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant................. 34
Item 11. Executive Compensation............................................. 34
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management..... 34
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions..................... 34
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.... 35
SIGNATURES.................................................................. 38
2
PART 1
ITEMS 1I
Items 1. AND 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
THE COMPANYGENERAL
Cheniere Energy, Inc., a holding company ("Cheniere,"Cheniere", together with
Cheniere Operating (as defined below) and Cheniere California (as defined
below), the "Company"), is the owner of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Cheniere
Energy Operating Co., Inc. ("Cheniere Operating") and Cheniere Energy
California, Inc. ("Cheniere California"). Cheniere
Operating is a Houston-based company
formed for the purpose of oil and gas exploration, and if warranted, development
and exploitation. Cheniere Operating was incorporated in Delaware
in February 1996 under the name FX Energy, Inc.
On July 3, 1996 Cheniere Operating consummated the transactions (the
"Reorganization") contemplated in the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
(the "Reorganization Agreement") dated April 16, 1996 between Cheniere
Operating and Bexy Communications, Inc., a publicly held Delaware corporation
("Bexy"). Pursuant to the terms of the Reorganization Agreement, (i) Bexy
transferred its existing assets and liabilities to Mars Ventures, Inc. ("Mars
Ventures"), a newly created, wholly owned subsidiary of Bexy; (ii) the
shareholders of Cheniere Operating transferred all the issued and outstanding
capital stock of Cheniere Operating to Bexy in exchange for approximately 8.3
million newly issued shares of Bexy common stock; (iii) Bexy distributed all
the issued and outstanding capital stock of Mars Ventures to the Original Bexy
Stockholders; and (iv) Bexy changed its name to Cheniere Energy, Inc.
Immediately following the reorganization, the former shareholders of Cheniere
Operating held 93 percent of the issued and outstanding stock of Cheniere, and
the Original Bexy Stockholders held the remaining seven percent of the
outstanding capital stock of Cheniere.
The Common Stock of the Company is traded on the over-the-counter market and
quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (the "Bulletin Board") of the National
Association of Securities Dealers (the "NASD") (ticker symbol "CHEX") with
10,624,794 shares outstanding as of November 22, 1996. The Company has applied
for a Nasdaq SmallCap Market listing.
The Company's principal executive offices are located at Two Allen Center,
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1710, Houston, Texas 77002. The Company's telephone
number is (713) 659-1361.
GENERAL
The Company is currently involved in a joint
exploration program which is engaged in the exploration for oil and natural gas
along the Gulf Coastcoast of Louisiana, onshore and in the shallow waters of the Gulf of
Mexico. The Company commenced its oil and gas activities in April 1996 through
such joint exploration program,program. Cheniere California was formed in December 1996
for the purposes of acquiring a working interest in undeveloped leases off Santa
Barbara, California from Poseidon Petroleum, LLC ("Poseidon"). The acquisition
did not occur and since July 3, 1996Cheniere California is currently inactive.
The Company has been publicly traded under the
namenot yet established oil and gas production, nor has it
booked proven oil and gas reserves. The Company is currently a development stage
enterprise with no operating revenues and no expectation of generating
meaningful operating revenues before calendar year 1998.
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
The CompanyOperating is involved with one major project, in the pre-drilling stage.
The Company entered into a joint exploration
program pursuant to an Exploration Agreement dated April 4, 1996 between FX Energy, Inc., now known
as Cheniere Operating and
Zydeco Exploration, Inc. ("Zydeco"), an operating subsidiary of Zydeco Energy,
Inc. (the "Exploration Agreement"), with regard to a new proprietary 3-D seismic
exploration project in southern Louisiana (the "3-D Joint Venture"Exploration Program").
The CompanyCheniere Operating has the right to earn up to a 50% participation in the 3-D
Joint Venture.Exploration Program. The Company believes that the 3-D seismic survey (the "Survey") is the first of its size that crosses the
coastline within the Transition Zone of Louisiana, an area extending a fewcovers 228 square
miles on either side of the Louisiana State coastline. The Survey is to be
conducted over certain areas located within a total295 square-mile area of approximately 255
squarerunning three to five miles running 5 miles southnorth and
generally 3 to 5five miles northsouth of the coastline in the most westerly 28 miles of
West Cameron Parish, Louisiana (the "Survey AMI"). Currently, the 3-D Joint Venture has permits and similar rights
to survey approximately 84% (210 square miles)Field acquisition of the Survey AMI and is
attempting to acquire rights to survey additional portions of the Survey AMI.
Accordingly, the 3-D Joint Venture does not currently have rights to survey
the entire Survey AMIseismic
data was completed in July 1997, and the extent of the Survey AMI which the 3-D Joint
Venture will be entitled to surveydata is dependent upon its ability to obtain
survey permitscurrently being processed and
similar
3
rights. The 3-D Joint Venture will survey specific sections selected by it
within the areas covered by such permits and rights. See "--Permit and Lease
Status Within the Survey AMI." A seismic data acquisition contractinterpreted.
Cheniere has been signedpublicly traded since July 3, 1996 under the name
Cheniere Energy, Inc. The Company's principal executive offices are located at
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1710, Houston, Texas 77002, and the 3-D Joint Venture has begun to conduct the Survey.
On July 26, 1996, the Company signed a Letter of Intent with Poseidon
Petroleum, LLC ("Poseidon") to purchase Poseidon's 47% working interest in
undeveloped reserves in the Bonito Unit of the Pacific Outer Continental
Shelf, offshore Santa Barbara County, California (the "Poseidon Interest").
The parties are conducting due diligence and are negotiating a definitive
purchase and sale agreement and related documentation. The transactions
contemplated in the Letter of Intent may be terminated by either party upon
the occurrence of certain events and there can be no assurance that the
Company will successfully consummate such transactions. Moreover, if such
transactions are consummated, the Company expects that development of the
reserves will not occur for at least five years. There can be no assurance
that the Company will successfully develop the reserves or that production of
the reserves will be economically viable.
The Company has not yet established oil and gas production, nor has it
booked proven oil and gas reserves.its telephone number is
(713) 659-1361.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company's objective is to increaseexpand the net value of its assets per share
by
growing itsbuilding an oil and gas reservesreserve base in a cost efficientcost-efficient manner. The Company
intends to pursue this objective by following an integrated strategy that
includes the following elements:
. FOCUS ON FEW PROJECTS WITH LARGE RESERVE POTENTIAL. Louisiana Gulf Coast Transition Zone. The Company'sCompany plans to focus
its resources on relatively few projects that possess large reserve potential
and favorable risk/reward characteristics. The Company believes that
attractive upstream oil and gas opportunities such as these are difficult to
identify and develop, and that the expertise of management and staff is best
utilized by focusing on like projects that may have a meaningful impact on the
value of its shares. Cheniere Operating's current activities are focused within oneon
its 3-D Exploration Program in South Louisiana, an area which the Transition Zone of Louisiana. The Company
believes that the Transition Zone, including the westernmost 28 miles of
Louisiana coastline that are within the Survey AMI, has significant remaining undiscovered reserves. The 3-D Joint Venture therefore plans to
focus its efforts on certain areas, all located within The Survey AMI. In
addition, the substantial infrastructure along the Gulf Coast and in the
shallow Gulf of Mexico facilitates the timely development of oil and gas discoveries at relatively attractive capital costs comparedreserve potential.
The Company continually evaluates new investment opportunities, including
exploration projects similar to those in
some other geographic regions. The Company's officers and the Zydeco staff
have extensive experience both onshore and offshore in the Gulf Coast and
believe the 3-D Joint Venture isExploration Program, as well positioned to evaluate, exploreas
acquisitions of producing and develop properties in the area.
Offshore California. The Company has signed a Letter of Intent with
Poseidon to purchase Poseidon's 47% working interest in undeveloped reserves in the Bonito Unit of the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf,
offshore Santa Barbara County, California. An independent reserve report is
being prepared to determine an estimate of the volume of undeveloped oil
and gas reserves attributable to the Poseidon Interest. The parties are
conducting due diligence and are negotiating a definitive purchase and sale
agreement and related documentation. The transactions contemplated in the
Letter of Intent may be terminated by either party upon the occurrence of
certain events and there can be no assurance that the Company will
successfully consummate such transactions. Moreover, if such transactions
are consummated, the Company expects that development of the reserves will
not occur for at least five years. There can be no assurance that the
Company will successfully develop the reserves or that the reserves will
yield sufficient quantities of oil and gas to be economically viable.properties.
. MAINTAIN A SIGNIFICANT WORKING INTEREST IN EACH PROJECT. TheConsistent with its
intent to focus on a few meaningful projects, the Company aims to maintain a
significant working interest in each project. As an example, Cheniere
Operating has the right to earn up to a 50% participation in the 3-D
Joint Venture. Under the
terms of the Exploration Agreement, the Company must timely meet its payment
obligations to the 3-D Joint Venture in order to reach a 50% participation.
The CompanyProgram.
3
Cheniere does not intend to be an operator in the area,this project, but intends to
maintain a significant working interest to better leverage its administrative
and technical resources and to better influence operator decisions.
4
. UTILIZE THE LATEST EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY. The
Company intends to use the latest technology to enhance the efficiency and
economy of its exploration, development and production efforts. These include
the use of advanced 3-D seismic acquisition and processing techniques in the
Survey AMI. Toward that end, the 3-D Exploration Program is using a Hewlett
Packard XCLASS SPP-2000 parallel processing system to process seismic data
acquired in the Survey.
. CONTROL OVERHEAD COSTS. The Company plans to maintain a small, but experienced
working staff, and to leverage theirits talents by focusing on a
relatively few projects which have high reserve potential in which it can
obtain a high working interest,seeking industry partners and to employ
outside consultants and seek
industry partners with the appropriate geographic and technical experience.
Currently,Zydeco, Cheniere's industry partner in the Company3-D Exploration Program, has no employees other than its executivea
technical staff that includes 12 geologists, geophysicists and landmen,
including officers, with many years of experience in the south Louisiana
exploration and one administrative assistant.production. In addition, INEXS (Interactive Exploration
Solutions, Inc.), a leading seismic consulting firm in Houston, is
complementing Zydeco's in-house interpretation effort.
THE 3-D JOINT VENTURE EXPLORATION PROJECTPROGRAM IN WEST CAMERON PARISH, LOUISIANA TRANSITION ZONE
The Company's first exploration project is the 3-D Joint Venture,Exploration Program, in which the CompanyCheniere Operating has the right to
earn up to a 50% participation, inconsists of a new228-square mile proprietary
3-D seismic exploration project that the Company believes will be
the largestsurvey (the "Survey") shot within a 295 square-mile area running three
to five miles north and generally five miles south of its kind that crosses the coastline within the Louisiana
Transition Zone. The Survey AMI covers approximately 255 square miles situated
onshore and offshore overin the most
westerly 28 miles of the shoreline in West
Cameron Parish, Louisiana.Louisiana (the "Survey AMI"). The Survey
AMI includes areas outside and adjacent to the Survey over which the 3-D
Exploration Program has purchased and plans to purchase non-proprietary seismic
data.
The 3-D Joint Venture must obtain permits or similar rights to survey the
areasExploration Program is located within an area referred to as the
Survey AMI. Currently, the 3-D Joint Venture has
rights to Survey 51,360 net acresTransition Zone of Louisiana, State Waters, pursuantwhich defines an area extending roughly three to
an
exclusive permit, approximately 23,000 acres of Federal OCS Waters and certain
privately held areas onshore which together constitute approximately 84% (210
square miles)five miles on either side of the Survey AMI and is attempting to acquire rights from
additional private owners. There can be no assurance that the 3-D Joint
Venture will successfully obtain rights to survey additional portions of the
Survey AMI. The 3-D Joint Venture intends to survey specific sections selected
by it within the areas covered by its permits and similar rights. See "--
Permit and Lease Status Within the Survey AMI."coastline. The Company believes that survey sites locatedthe
Transition Zone, including the westernmost 28 miles of Louisiana coastline that
are within the Survey AMI, have the potential for containing
substantialhas significant remaining undiscovered oil and gas
reserves, based onreserve potential. Substantial infrastructure along the numberGulf Coast and size of
existing fields in and around the Survey AMI, the low level of historical
exploration in the
Survey AMIshallow Gulf of Mexico should permit Cheniere Operating to lower its development
costs compared to those in other geographic regions and the exploration success resulting from a
speculative 3-D seismic survey shot by an independent geophysical services
companyfacilitates timely
development of oil and gas discoveries. The Company's officers and Zydeco have
extensive experience both onshore and offshore in the adjacent Federal offshore area. An acquisition contract with
Grant Geophysical, Inc. has been signedGulf Coast and believe the
3-D Joint Venture has begunExploration Program is well positioned to conductevaluate, explore and develop
properties in the Survey.
3-D Joint Venturearea.
Exploration Agreement
Under the terms of the Exploration Agreement and its Amendments, Cheniere
Operating is obligated to pay 100% of the Seismic Costs (as defined below) up to
$13.5 million, (subject to adjustment as described in the following sentence) in
accordance with a fixed schedule of monthly payments, and 50% of the excess of any such costs, to acquire a 50% working
interest participation in the leasing and drilling of all Prospects (as defined
below) generated by Zydeco within the Survey AMI. If premiums required for turnkey contracts cause total Seismic
Costs to exceed $13.5 million, Cheniere Operating will bear 100% of Seismic
Costs only up to $13 million, and Seismic Costs greater than $13 million will
be borne equally by Cheniere Operating and Zydeco. "Seismic Costs" are defined in the
Exploration Agreement to include the following, inter alia: costs paid
to third parties for acquiring and
processing seismic data; turnkey contracts; legal costs; options to lease land and leases of land;
and the cost of seismic permits including the seismicseimic permit granted by the State
of Louisiana discussed below. See "--Permit and Lease Status Within the Survey AMI-Offshore
Area."
Under the terms of the Exploration Agreement, Zydeco will perform, or cause
to be performed, all of the planning, land, geologic, and interpretative
functions necessary to the project and will design and oversee the acquisition
and processing of seismic data, interpret results, acquire leases and generate
Prospects. The term "Prospect" is defined in the Exploration Agreement as a
block of acreage suitable for exploration and includesincluding the leasehold, operating,
nonoperating, mineral and royalty interests, licenses, permits, and contract
rights relating thereto. Cheniere Operating has the right to review all data and may
elect to generate its own Prospects. Neither party to the 3-D Joint VentureExploration
program is permitted to sell or license the data without the other party's
approval.
5
As described above, under the termsCheniere Operating has paid 100% of the Exploration Agreement,first $13.5 million of Seismic
Costs. Cheniere Operating is obligated to make payments for theOperating's 50% share of excess Seismic Costs into a joint
venture account (the "Joint Venture Account"). The Exploration Agreement
originally provided for an initial installment of $3 million to be paid by May
15, 1996, which was extended to June 14, 1996 by agreement of the parties.
Subsequent payments were due on the last day of each of the months of June
1996 through February 1997. Each of the payments was required to beDecember
31, 1997, is estimated in the amount of $1 million with the exception of the payments at the end of
September 1996 and February 1997 which were required to be for $2 million and
$1.5 million, respectively (although the February 1997 payment may be reduced
to $1.0 million under certain circumstances described above).
Pursuant to the SecondSeventh Amendment to the Exploration Agreement dated August
5, 1996, Cheniere Operating was required to make the payments due on June 30,
1996 and July 30, 1996 on August 5, 1996 and October 31, 1996, respectively.
Such payments have been timely made. At August 31, 1996, Cheniere Operating
had paid $4 million to the Joint Venture Account, and subsequently advanced
payments of $1 million each on September 4, 1996 and October 31, 1996. Total
such payments for Seismic Costs at October 31, 1996 were $6 million. Effective
October 31, 1996, the Company and Zydeco amended the Cheniere Agreement (Third
Amendment to the Exploration Agreement dated October 31, 1996) to delay the
timing of the remaining payments required to
be paid consistent with Zydeco's
current expectationsapproximately $2.9 million. The total of the timing ofthose costs is payable to be incurredZydeco on
the project. The
remaining payments are due on the last days of November 1996, and January,
February and March of4
December 31, 1997. A failure by Cheniere to make the November payment
on such date will be treated as a Discontinuance (as defined below). Each of
the payments is required to be in the amount of $2 million, with the exception
of the final payment due at the end of March 1997, which is required to be in
the amount of $1.5 million. Cheniere intends to make its future payments under
the amended Exploration Agreement, however, the Company does not have
sufficient capital to cover such payments and there can be no assurance that
the Company will secure the necessary funds. In the event Cheniere Operating fails to make a scheduledthe December
31, 1997, payment into the Joint VentureExploration Program Account within 30 days after the date such payment is dueon a timely basis (a
"Discontinuance"):
(i)1) The obligation and right of Cheniere Operating to make such paymentspayment
will terminate. Zydeco would have the right to complete the acquisition and processing
of seismic data with the cooperation or assistance of other companies.
In addition, Cheniere Operating's Prospect ownership interest would be
limited to the total amount of its contribution to the Joint
VentureExploration
Program Account, divided by twice the amount of funds expended for
Seismic Costs, expressed as a percentage. For example, if Cheniere Operating made a
total contribution of $6 million to the Joint Venture Account, prior to a
Discontinuance, and total Seismic Costs were $13.5 million, Cheniere
Operating's Prospect ownership interest would be limited to 22.2%;
(ii)percentage;
2) If following a Discontinuance, Zydeco contributescontributres funds that
otherwise were required to have been provided by Cheniere Operating
under the terms of the Exploration Agreement, Zydeco shall be entitled
to receive back such funds, together with interest thereon at the
prime interest rate, from revenues attributable to Cheniere
Operating's interest in any Prospect (including, without limitation,
any working interest or overriding royalty interest revenues from
production or front endfront-end proceeds attributable to such interest when
owned by Cheniere Operating under the applicable operating agreement
or proceeds from the sale or license of seismic data); (iii) Subject to (iv) immediately below, ifand
3) If a Discontinuance occurs, and Zydeco does not itself fund the
deficient Seismic Costs, Zydeco may sell, trade, farm-out, lease,
sublease, or otherwise trade (collectively, a "Trade") the aggregate
(i.e., both that of Zydeco and Cheniere Operating) Prospect interests
to any party on arms' length-length terms. For this purpose the aggregate
Prospect interests includes all seismic data acquired, and revenues
from a Trade include seismic data sale or license proceeds. Any
revenues accruing from a Trade shall be applied toward the cost of
completing the project contemplated under the Exploration Agreement;Agreement.
Zydeco and
(iv) Should Cheniere Operating have funded $8,000,000 or more priorentered into an Exploration Program
Agreement and a related default joint operating agreement which provide for the
funding of prospect, exploratory and development costs subsequent to the Discontinuance, then the parties will treat Cheniere Operating as
having earned a vested Prospect ownership interest of 25%, which
6
shall not be subject to any Trade, and any revenues from a Trade, which
would in this instance cover a 75% Prospect ownership interest, shall be
shared 33 1/3% by Cheniere Operating and 66 2/3% by Zydeco.
Prospect Expenses (as defined below) are to be borne equally by Zydeco and
Cheniere Operating; provided, however, that in the event of a Discontinuance,
Cheniere Operating shall bear a percentagecompletion
of the Prospect Expenses equal to
its Prospect ownership interest. "Prospect Expenses" are defined indata acquisition, processing, and interpretation phases of the Exploration Agreement as: lease bonuses and brokerage for leases; delay or
shut in rental payments on leases or interest acquired under the Exploration
Agreement; engineering costs; and certain other costs related to Prospects. If
Cheniere Operating fails toseismic
work. Each party will pay its proportionate share of Prospect Expenses within 30 days
of receipt of a bill therefor, itthese costs and Zydeco, as
operator, will be deemed to have declined to
participateconduct all operations in accordance with the Prospect and will have no interest or liability related to
the Prospect in question.
In the event that Zydeco incurs a contractual liability to a third party in
performing its undertakings under the Exploration Agreement, such contractual
liability shall be treated as a Prospect Expense. In the event that Zydeco
incurs a tort liability to a third party in performing its undertakings under
the Exploration Agreement, and such liability is a result of gross negligence
or willful malfeasance, such liability, and all attorneys fees and expenses
relating thereto, shall be solely Zydeco's responsibility. In the event that
Zydeco incurs a tort liability to a third party in performing its undertakings
under the Exploration Agreement, and such liability is not a result of gross
negligence or willful malfeasance, such liability, and all attorneys' fees and
expenses relating thereto, shall be borne equally by the Company and Zydeco.
Location and Hydrocarbon Potentialterms of the Joint
Operating Agreement.
Description of the Louisiana Transition Zone Survey AreaAMI
The Survey AMI, which contains the specific areas to be covered by the
Survey, lies within the Gulf Coast/Gulf
of Mexico basin, a highly prolific natural gas region.hydrocarbon province. Nevertheless, the
Transition Zone has beenrepresents a relatively less explored to datearea within that region as
compared to exclusively onshore or offshore regionsareas because of the relatively high relative
cost and logistical and technical difficulties associated with conducting modern
seismic surveys over the diverse surface environments encountered along the
coast. An
additional impediment has beenCompounding the difficultyproblem of negotiating with
sophisticated landowners who control mostscarce seismic data is the fact that the State
Waters area commonly fell between the jurisdictional responsibilities of onshore
and offshore divisions of the area close to the Louisiana
coastline. The paucity of modern seismic data hasmajor oil companies. These conditions have limited
the drilling density: the spacingdensity of deep exploration wells testingwithin the primary objective
section, outside of the known fields, is less thanSurvey area to roughly
one well per five square miles. Importantly, recent declines inmiles (outside of known fields). However, innovative
design parameters for the cost of supercomputing workstationsSurvey which can be employed inlowered acquisition and processing and interpretingcosts
below estimates from seismic data have made
projects such as this Transition Zone venture technically and economically
feasible.
The Louisiana Transition Zone containscontractors, thereby reducing the Miocene Trend which has produced
many of the largest oil and gas fields in the continental United States and
its territorial waters. Objectives within the Miocene Trend have excellent
reservoir characteristics and have historically exhibited multiple pay zones,
which can allow a single strategically placed well bore to drain multiple
reservoirs. Given the relatively low level of historical explorationcapital
investment and the high recovery factors characterizing the Louisiana Transition Zone, the
Company believes that this zone has the potential for containing substantial
undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Miocene age reservoirs in fields overlapping
the Survey AMI have produced in excesslikelihood of 3 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of
natural gas. Along the northeast quadrant of the Survey AMI the Mud Lake and
Second Bayou Fields have cumulatively produced more than 1.3 tcf of natural
gas to date, with more than 250 billion cubic feet (bcf) having been produced
from one well. In the southwestern quadrant of the Survey AMI, the West
Cameron Block 17 Field in the State and Federal waters has cumulatively
produced more than 980 bcf to date. Numerous other smaller, but still
significant, oil and gas fields surround and overlay the area.
Immediately to the south of the Survey Area, a successful industry drilling
program based partly on a speculative 3-D survey provides an analogy that
illustrates the remaining potential for new discoveries in an area already
densely shot with 2-D seismic, and the contribution which new 3-D seismic can
make. In 1989, a 3-D seismic survey shot by an independent geophysical
services company along the shallow Federal waters in the western part of the
Western Cameron area led to 3 new field discoveries. Together with another
discovery made
7
coincident with the 3-D survey, these four new fields have produced
approximately 320 bcfe of natural gas to date from 15 boreholes. The middle to
lower Miocene reservoir section has excellent flow characteristics, as can be
seen by the per well recoveries, 21 bcfe of natural gas to date, in the area
of the adjacent shoot. In addition to the volumes produced from these
discoveries, additional reserves have been brought on through exploitation
wells drilled into existing fields.economic development.
The entire Survey AMI is located within an existing pipeline
infrastructure. As a result, it will generally be quicker and less costly to
develop and connect reserves found onshore and in the shallow offshore areas to
markets than would be the case for reserves found in deeper water areas.the Federal Waters of the
Gulf of Mexico. The Louisiana Gulf Coast/Gulf of Mexico region enjoys easy
access to the premium-priced consumption markets of the East Coast.
Permit and Lease Status Within the Survey AMI
The 3-D Joint Venture will survey only certain sectionsSurvey AMI covers onshore lands, State Waters, and Federal OCS (Outer
Continental Shelf) acreage. The permit and lease status of the three areas is
described below.
5
Onshore Area. Lease options have been obtained over 28,000 acres, and
farmouts have been obtained over 5,000 acres of land lying withinonshore in the
central portion of the Survey AMI.
The area to be covered by the Survey is dependent upon the status
of permits granting the 3-D Joint Venture the right to Survey certain areas
and its ability to obtain such permits or similar rights in the future.
Offshore Area--State Waters Exclusive Permit and Federal Offshore Permits.State Waters. On February 14, 1996, the State of Louisiana awarded Zydeco
the exclusive right (the "Louisiana Seismic Permit", dated February 19, 1996)) to shoot and gather seismic
data over the 51,360 net unleased acres of Louisiana State waters (running out
to a 3 1/2 mile limit located within the Survey AMI) in the western half of
West Cameron Parish. The term of the Louisiana Seismic Permit iswas for 18 months and
may behas been extended at Zydeco's option for an additional 6 months by paymentsix months. As discussed below in "Seismic
Results to Date," the Company has completed the shooting and gathering of
an additional fee of $391,876.80.seismic data. During this term Zydeco has the exclusive right to nominate blocks
of acreage for leasing in the covered State waters. The Company may, at its
option, nominate blocks of acreage for leasing during this period of exclusive
rights or at any time thereafter.
Federal Waters. The Survey AMI includes an area running southward generally
up to 2 miles into Federal waters. Zydeco's seismic contractor, Grant Geophysical, Inc., has received
approval from the U.S. Government to survey over approximately 23,000 acres of
Federal offshore lands located within the Survey AMI. Although Zydeco has no exclusive rights
regarding leases in the Federal waters, severaltwo offshore lease blocks held by
industry and covered by the Survey are scheduled to expire within the next two yearsduring 1997 and may then be available for leasing.
Onshore Area--Prospective Permits, Lease Options, and Farmouts. Zydeco is in
negotiationsthe 1998
Eastern Gulf OCS sale.
Seismic Results to obtain variously, farmouts, seismic permits or lease options,
with ownersDate
In the fall of the mineral interests covering1996 approximately 85,000 additional
acres of privately owned lands lying under the onshore portion12% of the Survey AMI ("Onshore Area"). The outcomewas shot prior to a
shutdown for the winter. Shooting resumed in April of these discussions will effect1997 and was completed in
July 1997. During the exact
delineationwinter months, Zydeco processed the initial data, thereby
determining the optimal processing sequence for the remainder of the areas which will be subject to the Survey within the Survey
AMI. As of this date,data that
was shot in 1997. At present, seismic permits or options covering over 54,000 acres of
the Onshore Area have already been obtained.
Technological Aspects of 3-D Seismic Shoot and Prospect Generation
The Company believes that recently developed seismic processing and
interpretation technology, including some key technology which Zydeco has
licensed for use in Southern Louisiana on an exclusive basis, has now evolvedis underway with respect
to a point where quality control for a Transition Zone surveyfirst phase of processed data. A second phase of processed data, created
using pre-stack time migration techniques, will begin to be improved
significantly. The Survey will incorporate certain of these new techniques for
the first timeavailable in
a major seismic survey. Moreover, the Company believes that
the areal extentNovember 1997. Interpretation of the Survey, whichincluding prospect generation, is
unusually large for a shallow
water/onshore seismic survey should permit better imaging of the subsurface,
particularly of the deeper zones.
The design of the Survey has been ledbeing conducted by Rudy Prince, Zydeco's Vice-
Chairman, who was formerly CEOZydeco geophysical personnel and a founder of Digicon Geophysical Corp., a
seismic services company. A primary objective of the Survey is to provide for
accurate and consistent data sufficient for analysis of hydrocarbon indicators
in a depth range of 8,000-20,000 feet atby an attractive price. The design will
employ technology referred to as "wavefield imaging", for which Zydeco has
obtained an exclusive license for use in the Louisiana Transition Zone (from
Wavefield
8
Imaging,INEXS (Interactive
Exploration Solutions, Inc.). The approach combines a relatively lower density array of
shots and receivers with 3-D prestack migration. Moreover, the Company
believes that the use of a single type of shot, dynamite, and a single type of
receiver, hydrophone, across the coastline, will simplify and improve seismic
processing across the different Transition Zone environments.
Data Acquisition. The Company believes that use of similar source (dynamite)
and receiver (hydrophone) components laid out in a symmetrical array across
the shoreline will eliminate the problems of integrating two different types
of data sets (land and marine) and improve data consistency. A limited amount
of airgun source data will be acquired in the Federal waters and around the
few producing fields. A primary consideration in the design, the relatively
deep zones of interest (8,000-20,000 feet), calls for long north-south
transects (up to 10 miles) to improve the quality of deep data.
Data Transmission, Processing and Interpretation. Data will be transferred
daily from the field crew to Zydeco's headquarters in Houston, where it will
undergo nearly real-time processing. This procedure will allow Zydeco to
closely monitor 3-D data quality and make adjustments to the acquisition
parameters if necessary. This new technology also significantly reduces the
delay time between the Survey itself and ultimate drilling decisions. In
combination with a reduced cost design for field data acquisition, Zydeco will
employ a proven technology, 3-D prestack migration, in seeking to obtain
superior quality subsurface images. To maximize quality control and minimize
delays Zydeco will process the data in-house. Having completed seismic
processing, Zydeco will also employ state of the art Computer Aided
Exploration (CAEX) interpretation techniques to locate and define drilling
prospects. consulting geophysicist.
Schedule for the 3-D Joint Venture
While the Louisiana Seismic Permit, whose primary 18 month term expires in
August 1997, may be extended at Zydeco's option until February 19, 1998 by
payment of an additional fee of $391,876.80, Zydeco presently plans to adhere
to the schedule summarized below:
2nd Quarter 1996-1st Quarter 1997 --Onshore PermittingExploration Program
Processing and Lease Optioning
3rd Quarter 1996-2nd Quarter 1997 --Conduct Seismic Survey and Simultaneously
Begin Processing & Interpretation of Data
Received
2nd Quarter 1997-3rd Quarter 1997 --Continue Survey, Processing &
Interpretation, and Identify Prospects
4th Quarter 1997 --Nominate and Bid State Leases, Exercise
Lease Options Onshore; Propose, Contract
for Drilling, and Commence Drilling of
First Prospects
Under the termsinterpretation of the Louisiana Seismic Permit, the 3-D Joint VentureSurvey data will be liable to pay penalties of $783,753.60 in the event it fails to (i)
complete the acquisition of the seismic data covering the entire area subject
to such Permit or (ii) provide access to such data to the State of Louisiana
in a timely manner. Under the terms of the Exploration Agreement, any such
penalties payable under the Louisiana Seismic Permit shall be borne equally bycontinue through
year-end 1997 and into 1998. Zydeco and Cheniere expect to nominate and bid on
State leases and exercise lease options onshore that underlie identified
prospects during the Company. There can be no assurance that the 3-D Joint Venture
will complete its scheduled activitiesfirst calendar quarter of 1998. First drilling within the
time periodSurvey AMI is expected during the second calendar quarter of the Louisiana
Seismic Permit. Failure of the 3-D Joint Venture to complete its scheduled
activities within the term of the Louisiana Seismic Permit would materially
and adversely affect the value of the Company's interest in the Joint Venture.1998.
Zydeco and the CompanyCheniere Operating have designated the entire Survey AMI
(onshore and offshore) as an area of mutual interest for five years ending May
15, 2001, during which period the two companies may continue to drill, test, and
develop prospects within the Survey AMI. Any interest taken by either Zydeco or the
Company,
9
during such period, in any agreement or arrangement which creates or effects
an interest in hydrocarbons in lands within the Survey AMI, or an acquisition
of a contractual right to acquire such an interest shall be deemed taken for
development under the Exploration Agreement. The party acquiring such an
interest must offer to the other party the right, which may be waived by such
other party, to participate in the rights and obligations associated with such
interest in proportion to their respective Prospect ownership interests.
COMPETITION AND MARKETS
Competition in the industry is intense, particularly with respect to the
acquisition of producing properties and proved undeveloped acreage. The Company
competes with the major oil companies and other independent producers of varying
sizes, all of which are engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition
of producing and non-producing properties. Many of the Company's competitors
have financial resources and exploration and development budgets that are
substantially greater than those of the Company, which may adversely affect the
Company's ability to compete.
The Company anticipates selling a portion of its interest in certain of the
prospects within the Survey AMI as a means of funding its participation in the
development of these properties. The Company anticipates that competition will
arise from other companies also seeking drilling funds from potential working
interest partners. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in securing funds in this manner.
The availability of a ready market for and the price of any hydrocarbons
produced by the Company will depend on many factors beyond the control of the
Company, including the extent of domestic production and imports of foreign oil,
the marketing of competitive fuels, the proximity and capacity of natural gas
pipelines, the
6
availability of transportation and other market facilities, the demand for
hydrocarbons, the political conditions in international oil
producingoil-producing regions,
the effect of federal and state regulation of allowable rates of production,
taxation, and the conduct of drilling operations, and federal regulation of natural
gas. In the past, as a result of excess deliverability of natural gas, many
pipeline companies have curtailed the amount of natural gas taken from producing
wells, shut-in some producing wells, significantly reduced gas taken under
existing contracts, refused to make payments under applicable "take-or-pay"
provisions, and have not contracted for gas available from some newly completed
wells. The Company can give no assurance that such problems will not arise
again. In addition, the restructuring of the natural gas pipeline industry has
eliminated the gas purchasing activity of traditional interstate gas
transmission pipeline buyers.
Producers of natural gas, therefore, have been required to develop new
markets among gas marketing companies, end usersend-users of natural gas, and local
distribution companies. All of these factors, together with economic factors in
the marketing area, generally may affect the supply and/or demand for oil and
gas and thus the prices available for sales of oil and gas.
GOVERNMENTALGOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Company's oil and gas exploration, production, and related operations
are subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by Federalfederal and state
agencies. Failure to comply with such rules and regulations can result in
substantial penalties. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry
increases the Company's cost of doing business and affects its profitability.
Because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, the
Company is unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such
laws.
Production. In most areas, if not all, areas where the Company may conduct
activities, there may be statutory provisions regulating the production of oil
and natural gas under which administrative agencies may promulgate rules in
connection with the operation and production of both oil and gas wells,
determine the reasonable market demand for oil and gas, and establish allowable
rates of production. Such regulation may restrict the rate at which the
Company's wells produce oil or gas below the rate at which such wells would be
produced in the absence of such regulation, with the result that the amount or
timing of the Company's revenues could be adversely affected.
Regulation of Operations on Outer Continental Shelf. The Company plans tomay
acquire oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico. The Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act ("OCSLA") requires that all pipelines operating on or across the Outer
Continental Shelf (the "OCS"("OCS") provide open-access, non-discriminatory service.
Although the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") has opted not to
impose the regulations of Order No. 509, in which the FERC implemented
the OCSLA on
gatherers and other non-jurisdictional entities, the FERC
10
has retained the authority
to exercise jurisdiction over those entities if necessary to permit non-discriminatorynon-
discriminatory access to service on the OCS. In this regard, the FERC recently issued a
Statement of Policy ("Policy Statement") regarding the application of its
jurisdiction under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 ("NGA") and the OCSLA over natural
gas facilities and service on the OCS. In the Policy Statement the FERC concluded that
facilities located in water depths of 200 meters or more shall be presumed to
have a primary purpose of gathering up to the point of interconnection with the
interstate pipeline grid. FERC has determined that gathering facilities are
outside of its jurisdiction. While it is not possible to determine what the
actual impact of this new policy will be since FERC has determined that it will
no longer regulate the rates and services of OCS transmission facilities under
the NGA, it is possible that the Company could experience an increase in
transportation costs associated with its OCS natural gas production and,
possibly, reduced access to OCS transmission capacity.
Certain operations the Company conducts are on federal oil and gas leases,
which the Minerals Management Service (the "MMS") administers. The MMS issues
such leases through competitive bidding. These leases contain relatively
standardized terms and require compliance with detailed MMS regulations and
orders pursuant to the OCSLA (which are subject to change by the MMS). For offshore
operations, lessees must obtain MMS approval for exploration plans and
development and production plans prior to the commencement of such
operations. In addition to permits required from other agencies (such as the
Coast Guard, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection
Agency), lessees must obtain a permit from the MMS prior to the commencement of
drilling. The MMS has promulgated regulationsregulation requiring offshore production
facilities located
7
on the OCS to meet stringent engineering and construction specifications. TheIt has
proposed regulations to update production measurement and surface commingling
requirements for gas produced in the OCS. In addition, the MMS has proposed
additional safety-related regulations concerning the design and operating
procedures for OCS production platforms and pipelines. The MMS has postponed its
decision regarding the adoption of these regulations in order to gather more
information on the subject. The MMS also has regulations restricting the flaring
or venting of natural gas, and has recently amended such regulations to prohibit
the flaring of liquid hydrocarbons and oil without prior authorization except
under certain limited circumstances. Similarly, the MMS has promulgated other
regulations governing the plugging and abandonment of wells located offshore and
the removal of all production facilities. To cover the various obligations of
lessees on the OCS, the MMS generally requires that lessees post substantial
bonds or other acceptable assurances that such obligations will be met. The cost
of such bonds or other surety can be substantial and there is no assurance that
the Company can continue to obtain bonds or other surety in all cases.
In addition, the MMS is conductinghas conducted an inquiry into certain contract
agreements for which producers on MMS leases have received settlement proceeds
that are royalty bearing and the extent to which producers have paid the
appropriate royalties on those proceeds. The Company believes that this inquiry
will not have a material impact on its financial condition, liquidity, or
results of operations.
The MMS has recently issued a notice of proposed rulemakingrule-making in which it
proposes to amend its regulations governing the calculation of royalties and the
valuation of natural gas produced from federal leases. The principal feature in
the amendments, as proposed, would establish an alternative market-
indexmarket-index based
method to calculate royalties on certain natural gas production sold to
affiliates or pursuant to non-arm's-length sales contracts. The MMS has
proposed this rulemakingrule-making to facilitate royalty valuation in light of changes in
the gas marketing environment. Recently, the MMS announced its intention to
reconsider the proposal and reopen the comment period. The Company cannot
predict what action the MMS will take on these matters, nor can it predict at
this stage of the rulemakingrule-making proceeding how the Company might be affected by
amendments to the regulations.
Additional proposalsThe MMS recently issued a notice of proposed rule-making to modify the
valuation procedures for crude oil transactions and proceedings that might affectto amend the oil and gas
industry are pending beforevaluation
procedure for the FERC and the courts.sale of federal royalty oil. The Company cannot predict when or whether any such proposals may become effective. Inwhat
action the past,MMS will ultimately take on these matters, nor can it predict at this
stage of the natural gas industry has been heavily regulated. There is no assurance
thatrule-making proceeding how the regulatory approach currently pursuedCompany might be affected by
amendments to the FERC will continue
indefinitely.regulations.
Bonding and Financial Responsibility Requirements. The Company is required
to obtain bonding, or otherwise demonstrate financial responsibility, at varying
levels by governmental agencies in connection with obtaining state or federal
leases or acting as an owner or operator on such leases or of oil exploration
and 11
production related facilities. These bonds may cover such obligations as
plugging and abandonment of unproductive wells, removal and closure of related
exploration, and production facilities, and pollution liabilities. The costs of
such bonding and financial responsibility requirements can be substantial, and
there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such bonds
and/or otherwise demonstrate financial responsibility in all cases.
Natural Gas Marketing and Transportation. The FERC regulates the transportation
and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce pursuant to the NGA
and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 ("NGPA"(the "NGPA"). In the past the Federal
government has regulated the prices at which oil and gas could be sold.
Deregulation of wellhead sales in the natural gas industry began with the
enactment of the NGPA in 1978. In 1989 Congress enacted the Natural Gas
Wellhead Decontrol Act (the "Decontrol Act"). The Decontrol Act removed all NGA
and NGPA price and nonprice controls affecting wellhead sales of natural gas
effective January 1, 1993. While sales by producers of natural gas can
currently be made at uncontrolled market prices, Congress could reenact price
controls in the future.
On April 8, 1992, the FERC issued Order No. 636, as amended by Order No. 636-A
(issued in August 1992) and Order No. 636-B (issued in November 1992), as a
continuation of its efforts to improve the competitive structure of the
interstate natural gas pipeline industry and maximize the consumer benefits of a
competitive wellhead gas market. Interstate pipelines were required by FERC to
"unbundle," or separate, their traditional merchant sales services from their
transportation and storage services and to provide comparable transportation and
8
storage services with respect to all gas supplies whether purchased from the
pipeline or from other merchants such as marketers or producers. The pipelines
must now separately state the applicable rates for each unbundled service (e.g.,
for natural gas transportation and for storage). This unbundling process has
been implemented through negotiated settlement in individual pipeline services
restructuring proceedings. Ultimately, Order Nos. 636, et al., may enhance the
competitiveness of the natural gas market. Order Nos. 636, et al., have recently been
substantially affirmed and remanded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit. FERC's Order No. 636-C was recently issued as a result of that remand.
On February 27, 1997, the Commission issued Order No. 636-C in response to the
Court's remand. On remand, the Commission: (1) reaffirmed its decision to
exempt pipelines from sharing in gas supply realignment ("GSR") costs; (2)
reversed its requirement that pipelines allocate ten percent of GSR costs to
interruptible ("IT") customers and required pipelines to propose the percentage
of the GSR costs that their IT customers must absorb in light of individual
circumstances in existence on each pipeline; (3) modified its non-notice policy,
on a prospective basis, to the extent the prior policy restricts entitlement to
non-notice service to any particular group of customers; (4) reversed its
selection of a 20-year matching term for the right-of-first-refusal and adopted
a five-year matching term; (5) reaffirmed its decision to first require
customer-by-customer mitigation of the effects of SFV rate design; and (6)
reaffirmed its decision to establish the eligibility of customers of downstream
pipelines for the upstream pipeline's one-part, small-customer rate on a case-
by-case basis. In the Order the Commission emphasized that circumstances had
changed since it issued Order No. 636 in 1992, and stated that its determination
in the Order on remand would reflect changes that have taken place in the
industry. Several parties have filed requests for rehearing of the Order.
It is unclear what impact, if any, increased competition within the natural
gas industry under Order No.Nos. 636, et al. will have on the Company's activities.
Although Order No. 636 could provide the Company with additional market access
and more fairly applied transportation service rates, Order No. 636 could also
subject the Company to more restrictive pipeline imbalance tolerances and
greater penalties for violations of these tolerances.
The
FERC has announced its intention to re-examine certain of its
transportation-related policies, including the appropriate manner in which
interstate pipelines release transportation capacity under Order No. 636, and
the use of the market-based rates for interstate gas transmission. While any
resulting FERC action would affect the Company only indirectly, the FERC's current
rules and policy statements may have the effect of enhancing competition in
natural gas markets by, among other things, encouraging non-
producernon-producer natural gas
marketers to engage in certain purchase and sale transactions. The Company
cannot predict what action the FERC will take on these matters, nor can it
accurately predict whether the FERC's actions will achieve the goal of increasing
competition in markets in which the Company's natural gas is sold. However, the
Company does not believe that it will be treated materially differently than
other natural gas producers and marketers with which it competes.
Recently, theOn July 14, 1996, FERC issued a policy statement on howOrder No. 587 (RM96-1) which promulgated 140
business-practice standards developed by the Gas Industry Standards Board for
interstate natural gas pipelines. The standards cover certain business
practices such as nominations, flowing gas, invoicing and capacity release, as
well as adoption of protocols and procedures for exchanging these business
practices over the Internet. FERC denied rehearing in Order No. 587-A issued
October 31, 1996. Order No. 587-B promulgated electronic communications
standards on January 20, 1997. On April 18, 1997, in Order No. 587-B, FERC
denied request for rehearing of the dates for complying with the requirements of
Order No. 587-C, which requires pipelines can recoverto make pro forma tariff filings to
implement the costsstandards by May 1, 1997, implementation of new pipeline facilities. Whilethe Internet Web Page
Standards by August 1, 1997, and implementation of the Revised and New Business
Practices by November 1, 1997. On May 6, 1997, in Order No. 587-E, FERC denied
a request for rehearing of Order No. 587-B. An appeal of FERC Order Nos. 587
and 587-A is pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit. Oral arguments on this policy
statement affectsappeal are scheduled for April 20,
1998.
On February 28, 1997, FERC issued notice of a public conference to be held
on May 29 and 30, 1997, to conduct a broad inquiry into important issues facing
the Company only indirectly, in its present form, the new
policy should enhance competition in natural gas marketsindustry and facilitate
constructionFERC's regulation of gas supply laterals.the industry. The Company
cannot predict at this time what, if any, new standards or regulations may
ultimately result from this conference or what impact any such changes may have
on the industry.
9
Oil Sales and Transportation Rates. The FERC regulates the transportation of
oil in interstate commerce pursuant to the Interstate Commerce Act. Sales of
crude oil, condensate, and gas liquids by the Company are not regulated and are
made at market prices. However, the price a company receives from the sale of
these products is affected by the cost of transporting the products to market.
Effective as of January 1, 1995, the FERC implemented regulations establishing an
indexing system for transportation rates for oil pipelines, which would
12
generally index such rates to inflation, subject to certain conditions and
limitations. These regulations could increase the cost of transporting crude
oil, liquids, and condensate by pipeline. The Company is not able to predict
with certainty what effect, if any, these regulations will have on it,it; but other
factors being equal, the regulations may tend to increase transportation costs
or reduce wellhead prices for such commodities.
Environmental. The Company's operations are subject to numerous laws and
regulations governing the discharge of oil and hazardous materials into the
environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. These laws and
regulations may require the acquisition of various permits before drilling
commences,commences; restrict the types, quantities, and concentration of various
substances that can be released into the environment in connection with drilling
and production activities,activities; limit or prohibit drilling activities on certain
lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, and other protected areas,areas; and impose
substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from the Company's operations.
In particular, under the Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990 ("OPA(the "OPA 90"),
certain persons (including owners, operators, and demise chartersdemise-charterers of vessels,vessels;
owners and operators of onshore facilities,facilities; and lessees, permittees and holders
of rights of userights-of-use and easements in areas in which offshore facilities are located
("responsible parties")) may be held liable for various costs and damages.
These include removal costs and damages, damages to natural resources, and damages
for lost profits, impairment to earning capacity, and destruction of or injury
to real or personal property. Liability can arise when oil is discharged or
poses a substantial threat of discharge into United States waters. Liability
under the OPA 90 is strict, joint and several, unless one of the specific
defenses to liability applies, including an act of God, an act of war, or an act
or omission of a third party. The OPA 90 also requires certain responsible
parties to establish and maintain evidence of financial responsibility
sufficient to meet the maximum amount of liability to which the responsible
party could be subject under the liability limitation provisions. Moreover, the
recent trend toward stricter standards in environmental legislation and
regulation is likely to continue. In addition, legislation has been proposed in
Congress from time to time that would reclassify certain oil and gas exploration
and production wastes as "hazardous wastes"wastes," which would make the reclassified
wastes subject to much more stringent handling, disposal and clean-up
requirements. If such legislation were to be enacted, it could have a
significant impact on the operating costs of the Company, as well as the oil and
gas industry in general. State initiatives to further regulate the disposal of
oil and gas wastes are also pending in certain states, and these various
initiatives could have a similar impact on the Company. See "Risk Factors--UnitedFactors -
United States Governmental Regulation, Taxation and Price Control."
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
("CERCLA"), also known as the "Superfund" law,"Superfund Law," imposes liability without regard
to fault or the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons
that are considered to have contributed to the release of a "hazardous
substance" into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of
the disposal site or sites where the release occurred and companies that
disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances found at the
site. Persons who are or were responsible for releases of hazardous substances
under CERCLA may be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of
cleaning up the hazardous substances that may have been released into the
environment and for damages to natural resources, and it is not uncommon for
neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal
injury and property damage.
OPERATIONAL RISKS AND INSURANCE
The Company anticipates that any wells established by it will be drilled by
proven industry contractors undercontractors. Based on financial considerations, the Company may
choose to utilize turnkey contracts that limit the Company'sits financial and legal exposure.
However, circumstances may arise where the Company is unable to secure a turnkey
contract on satisfactory terms. In this case, the Company may decide to drill,
or cause to be drilled, the applicable test well(s) on either a footage or day rateday-
work basis, and the drilling thereof will be subject to the usual drilling
hazards such as cratering, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well
fluids, fires, pollution, and other environmental risks. The Company's
activities are also subject to perils specific to marine operations, such as
capsizing, collision, and
10
damage or loss from severe weather. These hazards can cause personal injury and
loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment,
pollution or environmental damage, and suspension of operations. In accordance
with customary industry practices, the Company intends to maintain insurance
against some, but not all, of such risks, and some, but not 13
all, of such losses.
The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against
could materially and adversely affect the Company's financial condition and
operations. Moreover, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to
maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates it considers reasonable.considered reasonable by the
Company.
MAR VENTURES INC.
Prior toOn July 3, 1996, Cheniere Operating underwent a reorganization by
consummating the transactions (the "Reorganization") contemplated in the
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the "Reorganization Agreement") dated
April 16, 1996, between Cheniere Operating and Bexy Communications, Inc., a
publicly held Delaware corporation ("Bexy"). Under the terms of the
Reorganization theAgreement, Bexy transferred its existing assets and liabilities
of Bexy
were transferred to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mar Ventures, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary ("Mar Ventures"). As part of
such Reorganization, the stock of Mar Ventures has beenwas distributed to the Originaloriginal
Bexy Stockholders.shareholders, and since that time Mar Ventures has not been affiliated with
the Company. Buddy Young, the former President and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of
Bexy, has agreed to indemnify the Company, the former shareholders of Cheniere
Operating and their respective officers, directors, attorneys, and other agents
from and against all claims which they may suffer, incur, or pay arising under
or incurred in connection with: (i) the operation of the business of Bexy prior
to the closing of the Reorganization; (ii) any error or omission with respect to
a material fact stated or required to be stated in the proxy materials filed by
Bexy in connection with the Reorganization or the registration statement filed
by Mar Ventures in connection with the distribution of its common stock to the
Originaloriginal Bexy Stockholders;stockholders; and (iii) certain taxes.
YOUNG CONSULTING AGREEMENT
Pursuant to a Consulting Agreement dated as of July 3, 1996, between
Cheniere and Buddy Young, the former President and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of
Bexy, the Company engaged Mr. Young as a consultant to provide management of the
Company with advice regarding the management and business of the Company. Mr.
Young agreed to provide such consulting services to the Company for 2two years
ending on July 3, 1998, at a rate of $75,000 per year. Mr. Young is no longernot an
employee of the Company and serves only in the capacity of a consultant.
EMPLOYEES
The Company has onetwo full-time employee, anemployees, both administrative assistant,assistants,
other than its executive officers. It also engages certain consultants from
time to time.
PROPERTIES
The Company subleases its Houston, Texas headquarters from Zydeco under a
month-to-month sublease covering approximately 1,3951,498 square feet at a monthly
rental of $1,100.$1,179. The Company believes that this arrangement gives it the
necessary flexibility to adapt to the changing space requirements of its
business.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains or incorporates by reference certain statements
that may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). All statements, other than statements of
historical facts so included in this annual report that address activities,
events, or developments that the Company intends, expects, projects, believes,
or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation:
statements regarding the Company's business strategy, plans and objectives;
statements expressing beliefs and expectations regarding the ability of the
Company to successfully raise the additional capital necessary to meet its
obligations under the Exploration Agreement, the ability of the Company to
secure the leases necessary to facilitate anticipated drilling
11
activities and the ability of the Company to attract additional working interest
owners to participate in the exploration and development within the Survey AMI.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not involved in any litigation.There are no legal proceedings currently pending against the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
14No matters were submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.
12
PART 2II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
From 1989 through December 1993, there was no public trading market for the
Bexy Common Stock. In December 1993, the common stock of Bexy began trading on
the Bulletin Board. In connection with the Reorganization, the Company
divested itself of the assets relating to the business of Bexy prior to the
Reorganization and has shifted its focus to oil and gas exploration.
Simultaneously with the Reorganization, each three outstanding shares of
common stock of Bexy was converted to one share of Common Stock and the
stockholders of Cheniere Operating were issued shares of Common Stock equaling
approximately 93% of the then issued and outstanding shares of Bexy causing
the existing stockholders of Bexy to be diluted to approximately 7%. On July
8, 1996, the Common Stock began trading on the Bulletin Board (ticker symbol
"CHEX"). As the nature of the business and theThe Common Stock has changed as a
result oftraded on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the Reorganization, this section describessymbol
"CHEX" since April 11, 1997. From the market price oftime the Common Stock following the Reorganization oncompany first traded publicly,
July 3, 1996.1996, until April 16, 1997, the Company traded on the OTC Bulletin
Board. The table below presents the high ask and low biddaily closing sales prices of
the Common Stock reported on the Bulletin
Board for the period from July 8, 1996 through August 7, 1996 were $6.00 and
$3.00, respectively.during each quarter. The corresponding high and low prices for the period from
August 8, 1996 through November 22, 1996 were $3.875 and $2.125. These
quotations reflect inter-dealerquotes represent "inter-dealer"
prices without retail mark-up, mark-downmarkups, markdown, or commissioncommissions and may not reflectnecessarily
represent actual transactions.
High ($) Low ($)
-------- -------
Period From July 3, 1996 to
August 31, 1996 3 7/8 3
Three Months Ended
November 30, 1996 5 1/2 2 13/32
February 28, 1997 5 5/8 2 3/4
May 31, 1997 5 1/2 3
August 31, 1997 4 1/4 2 31/32
As of September 27, 1996October 1, 1997, there were 766 record holders of the Common Stock
which does not include holders who hold their14,357,866 shares of the Company's Common
Stock in
"street name".outstanding held by 781 stockholders of record.
The Company has notnever paid any dividends since its inception and presently
anticipates that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of the
Company's business and that no dividendsa cash dividend on its Common Stock. The Company
currently intends to retain earnings to finance the growth and development of
its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the Common
Stock will be declared in the foreseeable future. Any future dividendschange in the Company's dividend
policy will be subject tomade at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors and will depend upon, among
other things, future earnings,in
light of the operating and financial condition, capital requirements, earnings and prospects
of the Company, its capital requirements and general business conditions.any restrictions under any credit agreements, as well as
other factors the Board of Directors deem relevant.
13
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following income statementSelected financial data and balance sheet data have beenset forth below are derived from the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The financial statementsConsolidated
Financial Statements of Cheniere Energy, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of August 31, 1996 and for the year then endedCompany that have been auditedexamined by Merdinger,
Fruchter, Rosen &and Corso, P.C. This information, independent accountants, for the periods
indicated. The financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
SEPTEMBER 1,
1995 TO
AUGUST 31,
1996
------------
Net operating revenues............................. $ --
(Loss) from continuing operations.................. (79,097)
(Loss) from continuing operations per share of
common stock...................................... (0.008)
(Loss) from discontinued operations................ (207,722)
Net (loss) per share of common stock............... (0.03)
Total Assets....................................... 5,145,310
Long-term obligations.............................. --
Total Liabilities.................................. 718,855
Total Shareholders' Equity......................... 4,426,455
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock.. --
15
report.
For the Periods Ended From Inception
August 31, August 31, (February 21, 1996)
1997 1996 to August 31, 1997
---- ---- -------------------
Net operating revenues $ - $ - $ -
(Loss) from operations (1,732,629) (123,647) (1,856,276)
Net (loss) (1,676,468) (121,847) (1,798,315)
Net (loss) per share of
common stock $(0.14) $(0.01) $(0.16)
August 31, August 31,
1997 1996
---- ----
Cash 234,764 1,093,180
Oil & gas properties,
unevaluated 13,500,000 4,000,000
Total assets 13,841,712 5,145,310
Long-term obligations - -
Total liabilities 888,291 718,855
Total shareholders' equity 12,953,421 4,426,455
Cash dividends declared per
share of common stock - -
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
Cheniere Operating was incorporated in Delaware in February of 1996 for the
purpose of entering the oil and gas exploration and exploitation business, initially on the
Louisiana Gulf Coast. In March ofOn July 3, 1996, Cheniere Operating entered into discussion withunderwent the
Reorganization whereby Bexy Communications, Inc., a publicly held Delaware
corporation ("Bexy") for a reorganization in order to give it a
presence in the public market.
On April 16, 1996, the Reorganization Agreement was entered into whereby the
Cheniere Operating stockholders would acquire control of Bexy in consideration
for the outstanding stock of Cheniere Operating.
Under the terms of the Reorganization Agreement, Bexy transferred its
existing assets of approximately $224,000 and its liabilities of approximately
$111,000 to Mar Ventures, Inc. ("Mar Ventures"), Bexy received 100% of the outstanding shares of Cheniere
Operating, and the former shareholders of Cheniere Operating received
approximately 8.3 million newly issued shares of
Bexy common stock, representing 93% of the then issued and outstanding Bexy shares. As a result of the
share exchange, a change in the control of the Company occurred. The
transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of Cheniere Operating became a wholly-owned subsidiary ofOperating. Bexy
spun off its existing assets and the
principal business became oilliabilities to its original shareholders and gas exploration. Bexy then
changed its name to Cheniere Energy, Inc.
The Company distributed14
Cheniere California signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Poseidon
Petroleum, LLC ("Poseidon") to acquire Poseidon's 60% working interest in six
undeveloped leases in the outstanding capital stockBonito Unit of Mar Venturesthe Pacific Outer Continental Shelf
offshore Santa Barbara County, California. During July 1997 Cheniere
California and Poseidon mutually agreed to terminate the Purchase and Sale
Agreement pursuant to the original holders of Bexy common stock.
The reorganization was accounted for as the recapitalization of Cheniere
Operatingterms thereof and the issuance of stock for the net assets of Bexy.that upon termination, neither party
thereto shall have liability thereunder.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--AUDITEDOPERATIONS - AUDITED STATEMENTS YEAR ENDEDFROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 21, 1996) TO
AUGUST 31, 19961997
The Company's operating results reflected a loss of $79,097,$1,798,315 or $0.16
per share, as there were
nothe Company has yet to generate revenues from continuing operations. General
& Administrative ("G&A") expense of $1,817,275 included a one-time, non-cash
charge of $624,400, incurred during the three-month period ended August 31,
1997, relating to 200,000 shares of Common Stock issued in exchange for
investment banking services. The balance of the G&A expense comprises primarily
the costs of professional expenses, salary and Administrativecompensation, insurance,
occupancy and office expense. Interest expense of $39,001 was incurred with
respect to two short-term promissory notes. Interest income of $57,961 was
generated on the Company's cash balances.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - AUDITED STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997
AND AUGUST 31, 1996
The Company's operating results for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997,
reflect a loss of $1,676,468 or $0.14 per share as compared to a loss of
$121,847, or $0.01 per share for the roughly six-month period from inception
(February 21, 1996) to August 31, 1996. The Company did not generate revenues
from operations in either of the periods. The increased loss in the most recent
fiscal year is primarily due to higher G&A expenses of $73,814 comprised$1,713,461, as compared
to $103,814 in the period to August 31, 1996. The higher level of G&A expenses
in the most recent period is the result of: (a) a one-time, non-cash charge of
$624,400 (as discussed above), (b) increased professional fees related to
registrations of the loss.
The Company incurred one time losses of $207,722 from the discontinuance of
its former businessCompany's Common Stock, (c) insurance expenses for
coverages not carried in the television productionearlier period, and health information field.
Total losses were $286,819.(d) the inclusion of a full
year of salary and compensation, occupancy and office expenses as compared to a
partial year for the period ended August 31, 1996. The Company's balance sheet reflected current assetsincreased loss is
additionally due to professional fees of $1,097,980 with
liabilities$164,812 related to an acquisition (the
"Poseidon" transaction) that was not consummated. Interest income of $718,855. Other assets reflect an investment of $4 million$56,161 in
the 3-D Joint Venture. After fiscal year end,latest period exceeded the $1,800 earned in early September 1996,the prior period, based on
larger average cash balances and in
late October 1996, the Company made an additional payments of $1 million each
to the 3-D Joint Venture, such that an aggregate of $6 million has been paid
by the Company to the 3-D Joint Venture to date.
The Company's capital reflects sales of shares net of offering expenses of
$609,451 and distribution of net assets of $112,902.comparatively longer period.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997, the Company raised $9.7
million proceeds net of placement fees from the sale of equity, which combined
with $500,000 proceeds from a short-term promissory note and cash balances, were
used to fund a $9.5 million investment in the Company's 3-D Exploration Program,
to repay a short-term promissory note ($215,000) and to fund operating expenses.
At August 31, 1996, the Company had working capital of $379,125. Operating
expenses and capitalized costs1997, total assets were financed by$13,841,712 compared to $5,145,310 at
August 31, 1996. The increase is primarily from the sale of common stockequity and
Bridge Loan (as defined below) fundinginvestment of the proceeds into the 3-D Exploration Program, as revenues have yetdiscussed above.
Current assets declined to be generated.
It is anticipated$291,905 from $1,097,980, due to a reduction in the
cash balance at August 31, 1997, as compared to August 31, 1996. Current
liabilities increased to $888,291 from $718,855, due to a slightly higher level
of accounts payable and accrued expenses, and loans payable, at August 31, 1997,
as compared to August 31, 1996.
The Company anticipates that future liquidity requirements, including theits
commitment to the 3-D Joint Venture which will amount to, at least, an additional $8
million,Exploration Program, will be met by cash balances, the
sale of equity, further borrowings, and/or the sales of portions of the Company'sits interest
in the 3-D Joint Venture.Exploration Program. At this time no assurance can be given that
such sale of equity, furtherfuture borrowings, or sales of portions of the Company'sits interest in
the 3-D Joint VentureExploration Program will provebe accomplished.
On August 28, 1997, the Company amended the Exploration Agreement to be successful.extend
the dates of further payments due to Zydeco relating to the 3-D Exploration
Program to December 31, 1997. The Company has in the past failed to timely make certain
payments due to the 3-D Joint Venture. While the Company has in such instances
succeeded in obtaining waivers under, and amendments to, the Exploration
Agreement extending the due dates for such required payments, there can be no
assurance that the Company will successfully obtain similar amendments should
it fail to timely make requiredcurrently funded $13.5 million of
Seismic Cost payments to the 3-D Joint VentureProgram and is responsible for 50% of the remaining
Seismic Costs ("Excess Costs") incurred through December 31, 1997, to earn a 50%
working interest
15
participation in the future.seismic data and leasing and drilling activities of the the
3-D Exploration Program. The Company's share of Excess Costs, by its own and
Zydeco's estimate, is approximately $2.9 million. Failure to pay any of the
Excess Costs by December 31, 1997, would result in a reduction of the Company's
working interest participation. The Company currently does not presently have sufficient
capital to meet its
futurethe December 31, 1997, payment, requirements and there can be no assurance
that the Companyit will successfully secure the necessary funds.
See "Business and Properties--3-
D Joint Venture Exploration Agreement."
16
PRIVATE PLACEMENTS OF EQUITY. Since its inception, the Company'sCheniere Operating's
primary source of financing for operating expenses and payments to the 3-D
Joint VentureExploration Program has been, originally, the sale of its equity securities, and
since the Reorganization with Bexy, funding from Cheniere through the sale of
Cheniere's equity securities. In MayThrough August 31, 1997, $14.6 million of
proceeds, net of placement fees, have been raised through the sale of equity,
and June 1996,$13.5 million of that amount was invested in the 3-D Exploration Program.
From inception through the Reorganization, Cheniere Operating raised $2,883,000,$2.9
million net of offering
costs,placement fees from the sale of shares of its common stock (which werewas exchanged
for
2,000,000 shares of the Common Stock following the Reorganization) to "accredited investors" (as
defined in Rule 501(a) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Securities Act")) pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act ("Regulation D"). The proceeds, together with cash balances,
were used to fund the majority of Cheniere Operating's initial $3 million payment to the 3-D
Joint Venture.
In order to finance a $1 million payment madeExploration Program.
Subsequent to the 3-D Joint Venture onReorganization and prior to August 9,31, 1996, the Company
soldraised $2.0 million net of placement fees from the sale of Common Stock pursuant
to Regulation D and Common Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock pursuant
to Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act ("Regulation S"). In July
1996, the Company sold 50,000 shares of the Common Stock to an "accredited
investor" pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D and the Company received
proceeds of $100,000 from such sale. In July and August 1996, the Company
conducted an offering of Common Stock pursuant to Regulation S. The Company
sold 508,400 shares of the Common Stock and received proceeds of $915,000, net
of placement fees, from such sale.
In late August 1996, the Company raised $1,000,000 from the sale of 100,000
units, each consisting of five shares of the Common Stock and a warrant to
purchase one share of the Common Stock, pursuant to Regulation S. The proceedsProceeds
were used to fund a $1 million payment to the 3-D Joint Venture made on
September 4, 1996.
BetweenExploration Program during
August.
During fiscal year end at August 31, 1996 and October 31, 1996,1997, the Company raised $1,237,500$9.7 million net proceedsof placement
fees from the sale of 588,027 shares of Common Stock to accredited investors pursuant to
Regulation D and certain otherto offshore investors pursuant to Regulation S. Proceeds received through October 31, 1996 were used
to fund a $1Of the $9.6
million payment toproceeds, $9.5 million was invested in the 3-D Joint Venture on that date.Exploration Program.
SHORT TERM PROMISSORY NOTES. In June 1996, Cheniere Operating borrowed
$425,000 (the "Bridge Loan") through a private placement of short term promissory notes with an initial
interest rate of 8%short-term
Promissory Notes (the "Notes"). The Notes were due on September 14, 1996. In connection with the placement of the Notes,
Cheniere Operating issued warrants (the "June Warrants"), which following the
Reorganization, were exchanged for an aggregate of 141,666 and 2/3 warrants to
purchase shares of the Common Stock, to the holders of the Notes (the
"Noteholders"), each of which warrants entitles the holder to purchase one
share of the Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share at any time on
or before June 14, 1999. The exercise price was determined at a 100% premium to
the sale price of Cheniere Operating stock by private placement during May 1996,
as the Company's stock was not publicly traded at that time. The Company has
satisfied all of its obligations under the Notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$210,000 by paying the accrued interest on such Notes and by agreeing to issue
105,000 shares of the Common Stock at a price of $2.00 per share to the holders
of such Notes pursuant to Regulation D. In addition, prior to the
maturity of the Notes, an individual Noteholder
(the "Remaining Noteholder") purchased several outstanding Notes, following
which such Noteholder held Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $215,000. In
connection with a
modification of the Bridge Loan arrangements as between the Remaining
Noteholder and the Company,exchange for such Notes, Cheniere Operating has issued a new promissory
notePromissory Note in the
amount of $215,000 to the Remaining Noteholder, with an interest rate of 13% per annum in
exchange for the Notes held by him. Such new promissory note is duewhich Cheniere Operating paid on
January
14, 1997.December 13, 1996. The Remaining Noteholder is also entitled to receive up to 21,500
additionalreceived 64,500 warrants to
purchase shares of the Common Stock for each month, or
partial month, any amounts remain due and payable after September 14, 1996, up
to a maximum aggregate numberin accordance with the terms of 86,000 such additional warrants.the original
Note Agreement. Such additional warrants will have identical terms as the June
Warrants, in accordance with the terms of the original Note Agreement. The
Remaining Noteholder was not an exercise priceaffiliate of $3.00the Company.
On July 31, 1997, Cheniere Operating borrowed $500,000 from a related
party, evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 10% per shareannum and will be
exercisable for 3 yearsdue
on August 29, 1997. On August 28, 1997, the maturity date was extended to
September 29, 1997. The promissory note was secured by an undivided 1.8519%
working interest in seismic data and leases acquired under the Exploration
Agreement relating to the 3-D Exploration Program and an undivided 3.7% interest
in proceeds from the datemarketing of issuance.
17proprietary seismic data under the Exploration
Agreement. The note was paid by the Company on September 22, 1997, including
all incurred interest. The collateral securing the note has been released; and,
according to the terms of the note, the maker's option to acquire an interest in
the Seismic Data, Lease Interest, and Exploration Agreement has been terminated.
16
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
Independent Auditors' Report..............................................Report................................................ 18
Consolidated Balance Sheet.................................................. 19
Consolidated Balance Sheet................................................Statement of Operations........................................ 20
Consolidated Statement of Operations......................................Stockholders' Equity.............................. 21
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity............................Cash Flows........................................ 22
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows...................................... 23-24
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................ 25-29
18Statements.................................. 23
17
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of CHENIERE
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES (a Development Stage Company) as of August 31,
1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.ended August 31, 1997, and for
the period from inception (February 21, 1996) to August 31, 1996. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit.audits.
We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES as of August 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the
year then ended August 31, 1997, and for the period from inception (February 21,
1996) to August 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
MERDINGER, FRUCHTER, ROSEN & CORSO, P.CP.C.
Certified Public Accountants
New York, New York
September 16,12, 1997,
except for Note 13, as
to which the date is
September 29, 1997.
18
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
August 31, August 31,
ASSETS 1997 1996
----------- ----------
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash $ 234,764 $1,093,180
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets 57,141 4,800
----------- ----------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 291,905 1,097,980
----------- ----------
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
Unevaluated 13,500,000 4,000,000
FIXED AND OTHER ASSETS
Property and Equipment, Net 49,807 46,830
Other - 500
----------- ----------
TOTAL ASSETS $13,841,712 $5,145,310
=========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 388,291 $ 292,894
Notes Payable - 425,000
Note Payable - Related Party 500,000 -
Advance from Officers - 961
----------- ----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 888,291 718,855
----------- ----------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - -
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock- $.003 Par Value
Authorized 20,000,000 shares;
14,160,866 and 9,931,767 Issued and
Outstanding at August 31,1997 and
1996, respectively 42,483 29,795
Preferred Stock- Authorized
1,000,000 Shares; None Issued
and Outstanding - -
Additional Paid-in-Capital 14,709,253 4,518,507
Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage (1,798,315) (121,847)
----------- ----------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 12,953,421 4,426,455
----------- ----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $13,841,712 $5,145,310
=========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
19
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AUGUST 31, 1996STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
ASSETS
------For the Year Ended For the Period Ended Cumulative
August 31, August 31, from the Date
1997 1996 of Inception
------------------ -------------------- -------------
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash............................................................
Revenue $ 1,093,180
Prepaid Expenses................................................ 4,800- $ - $ -
------------ ---------- -----------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS............................................ 1,097,980General and Administrative Expenses 1,713,461 103,814 1,817,275
Interest Expense 19,168 19,833 39,001
------------ ---------- -----------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET....................................... 46,8301,732,629 123,647 1,856,276
------------ ---------- -----------
OTHER ASSETS
Investment..................................................... 4,000,000
Security Deposit............................................... 500Loss from Operations Before Other Income (1,856,276)
and Provision for Income Taxes (1,732,629) (123,647)
Interest Income 56,161 1,800 57,961
------------ ---------- -----------
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS.............................................. 4,000,500Loss From Operations Before Provision
for Income Taxes (1,676,468) (121,847) (1,798,315)
Provision for Income Taxes - - -
------------ ---------- -----------
TOTAL ASSETS....................................................Net Loss $ 5,145,310(1,676,468) $ (121,847) $(1,798,315)
============ ========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable................................................Loss Per Share $ 275,975
Accrued Expenses and Taxes Payable.............................. 16,929
Loans Payable................................................... 425,000
Advance from Officers........................................... 961
-----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES............................................. 718,855
-----------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock--$.003 Par Value Authorized 20,000,000 shares;
9,931,767 Issued and Outstanding............................... 29,795
Preferred Stock--Authorized 1,000,000 shares; None Issued and
Outstanding.................................................... --
Additional Paid-in-Capital...................................... 5,626,840
Retained Deficit................................................ (1,230,180)
-----------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.................................... 4,426,455
-----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY....................(0.14) $ 5,145,310(0.01) $ (0.16)
============ ========== ===========
Weighted Average Number of Shares
Outstanding 12,143,919 8,610,941 11,043,155
============ ========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
20
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
(DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUSTSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock Additional Total
---------------------- Paid-In Retained Stockholders'
Per Share Shares Amount Capital Deficit Equity
--------- ----------- ------- ----------- ----------- -------------
Sale of Shares on April 9, 1996 $0.012 6,242,422 $18,727 $ 56,276 $ - $ 75,003
Sale of Shares on May 5, 1996 1.50 2,000,000 6,000 2,994,000 - 3,000,000
Issuance of Shares to an Employee on July 1,
1996 1.00 30,000 90 29,910 - 30,000
Issuance of Shares in
Reorganization to Former
Bexy Shareholders - 600,945 1,803 (1,803) - -
Sale of Shares on July 30, 1996 2.00 50,000 150 99,850 - 100,000
Sale of Shares on August 1, 1996 2.00 508,400 1,525 1,015,275 - 1,016,800
Sale of Shares on August 30, 1996 2.00 500,000 1,500 998,500 - 1,000,000
Expenses Related to Offering - - - (686,251) - (686,251)
Issuance of Warrants - - - 12,750 - 12,750
Net Loss - - - - (121,847) (121,847)
----------- ------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance - August 31, 1996 9,931,767 29,795 4,518,507 (121,847) 4,426,455
Sale of Shares on September 12, 1996 2.00 50,000 150 99,850 - 100,000
Sale of Shares on September 16, 1996 2.00 80,250 241 160,259 - 160,500
Conversion of Debt 2.00 105,000 315 209,685 - 210,000
Sale of Shares on October 30, 1996 2.25 457,777 1,373 1,028,627 - 1,030,000
Issuance of Warrants - - - 6,450 - 6,450
Sale of Shares on December 6, 1996 2.25 475,499 1,426 1,068,448 - 1,069,874
Sale of Shares on December 9, 1996 2.50 400,000 1,200 998,800 - 1,000,000
Sale of Shares on December 11, 1996 2.25 22,222 67 49,933 - 50,000
Sale of Shares on December 19, 1996 2.50 200,000 600 499,400 - 500,000
Sale of Shares on December 20, 1996 2.50 220,000 660 549,340 - 550,000
Sale of Shares on February 28, 1997 4.25 * 352,947 1,059 1,498,967 - 1,500,026
Sale of Shares on March 4, 1997 4.25 * 352,947 1,059 1,498,966 - 1,500,025
Sale of Shares on May 22, 1997 3.00 535,000 1,605 1,603,395 - 1,605,000
Issuance of Shares to Adjust Prices of Shares
Sold on February 28 and March 4 - * 294,124 883 (883) - -
Sale of Shares on June 26, 1997 3.00 33,333 100 99,900 - 100,000
Sale of Shares on July 24, 1997 3.00 250,000 750 749,250 - 750,000
Issuance of Shares in Connection with
Financial Advisory Services 3.125 200,000 600 624,400 - 625,000
Sale of Shares on July 30, 1997 3.00 100,000 300 299,700 - 300,000
Sale of Shares on August 19, 1997 3.00 100,000 300 299,700 - 300,000
Expenses Related to Offering - - - (1,153,441) - (1,153,441)
Net Loss - - - - (1,676,468) (1,676,468)
----------- ------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance - August 31, 1997 $14,160,866 $42,483 $14,709,253 $(1,798,315) $12,953,421
=========== ======= =========== =========== ===========
All of the sales of shares indicated above were made pursuant to private
placement transactions.
* Additional shares were issued to the purchasers of the shares sold on February
28, 1997 and March 4, 1997 pursuant to the terms of those sales.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this report.
21
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year For the Period
Ended Ended Cumulative
August 31, August 31, from Date
1997 1996 of Inception
------------- ---------------- -------------
Revenue.............................................................
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss $(1,676,468) $ --
General(121,847) $(1,798,315)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities: -
Depreciation 8,268 3,603 11,871
Compensation Paid in Common Stock 624,400 30,000 654,400
(Increase) in Prepaid Expenses and Administrative Expenses................................. 73,814Other Current (52,341) (4,800) (57,141)
Assets
(Increase) Decrease in Other Assets 500 (500) -
Increase in Accounts Payable and
Accrued Expenses 95,387 292,904 388,291
Increase (Decrease) in Advance from Officers (961) 961 -
------------ ----------- ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES (1,001,215) 200,321 (800,894)
------------ ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (11,235) (50,443) (61,678)
Investment in 3-D Exploration Program (9,500,000) (4,000,000) (13,500,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES (9,511,235) (4,050,443) (13,561,678)
------------ ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from Note Issuance 500,000 425,000 925,000
Repayment of Note (215,000) - (215,000)
Proceeds from Issuances of Common Stock 10,516,025 5,191,803 15,707,828
Issuance of Warrants 6,450 12,750 19,200
Offering Costs (1,153,441) (686,251) (1,839,692)
------------ ----------- ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 9,654,034 4,943,302 14,597,336
------------ ----------- ------------
NET(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH (858,416) 1,093,180 234,764
CASH- BEGINNING OF YEAR 1,093,180 - -
------------ ----------- ------------
CASH - END OF YEAR 234,764 1,093,180 234,764
============ =========== ============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash Paid for Interest Expense.................................................... 7,083
---------
Loss from Operations Before Other Income............................ (80,897)
Interest Income..................................................... 1,800
---------
Loss From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes................. (79,097)
Provision$ 15,635 $ - $ 15,635
============ =========== ============
Cash Paid for Income Taxes.......................................... --
---------
Loss From Continuing Operations..................................... (79,097)
---------
Discontinued Operations
Loss from operationsTaxes $ - $ - $ -
============ =========== ============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES:
Common stock totaling 105,000 shares was issued upon the conversion of
discontinued business (less applicable
income taxes$210,000 of $0).............................................. (149,080)
Lossdebt.
Common stock totaling 200,000 shares was issued in exchange for financial
advisory services and of $600. These shares have been valued at a total
of $625,000, based on disposal of business (less applicable income taxes of $0). (58,642)
---------
Loss From Discontinued Operations................................. (207,722)
---------
Net Loss............................................................ $(286,819)
=========
Loss Per Share...................................................... $ (.03)
=========the quoted market price per share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
21
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL NOTES TOTAL
-------------------- PAID-IN RETAINED RECEIVABLE STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------ -------------
Balance--September 1,
1995................... 1,558,947 $133,654 $ 992,831 $ (943,361) $(46,674) $ 136,450
Sales of Shares--Prior
to Reorganization...... 244,512 13,750 123,750 -- -- 137,500
Exchange of Shares--Due
to Reverse Split....... (1,202,514) (145,601) 145,601 -- -- --
Sale of Shares--At Time
of and Subsequent to
the Reorganization..... 9,330,822 27,992 5,087,011 -- -- 5,115,003
Expenses Related to
Offering............... -- -- (609,451) -- -- (609,451)
Repayment of Receivable. -- -- -- -- 16,439 16,439
Distribution of Net
Assets................. -- -- (112,902) -- 30,235 (82,667)
Net Loss................ -- -- -- (286,819) -- (286,819)
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- -------- ----------
Balance--August 31,
1996................... 9,931,767 $ 29,795 $5,626,840 $(1,230,180) $ -- $4,426,455
========== ======== ========== =========== ======== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this report.
22
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss......................................................... $ (286,819)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities:
Depreciation..................................................... 4,503
(Increase) in Accounts Receivable................................ (5,600)
(Increase) in Prepaid Expenses................................... (4,800)
Decrease in Inventory............................................ 2,700
(Increase) in Security Deposit................................... (500)
Decrease in Other Assets......................................... 2,122
Increase in Accounts Payable..................................... 279,514
(Decrease) in Accrued Expenses and Taxes Payable................. 11,949
Increase in Advance from Officers................................ 961
----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES.......................... 4,030
----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment.................... (50,999)
Investment....................................................... (4,000,000)
----------
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES.............................. (4,050,999)
----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Sale of Common Stock............................................. 5,252,503
Offering Costs................................................... (609,451)
Proceeds of Loan................................................. 425,000
Notes Receivable................................................. 16,439
Notes Payable.................................................... (7,519)
Distribution..................................................... (50,957)
----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES.......................... 5,026,015
----------
NET INCREASE IN CASH............................................... 979,046
CASH--BEGINNING OF PERIOD.......................................... 114,134
----------
CASH--AUGUST 31, 1996.............................................. $1,093,180
==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
23
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest................................................ $ --
Cash paid for income taxes............................................ $ --
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INFORMATION:
During the year, the Company distributed the assets and liabilities of its
discontinued operations. The net noncash distribution was $61,945.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
24
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 19961997
NOTE 1--NATURE1-SUMMARY OF OPERATIONSSIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Cheniere Energy, Inc., a holding company ("Cheniere," together with Cheniere
Operating (as defined below) and Cheniere California (as defined below), the
"Company"), is the owner of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Cheniere
Energy Operating Co., Inc. ("Cheniere Operating") and Cheniere Energy
California, Inc. ("Cheniere California"). Cheniere Operating is a Houston-basedHouston-
based company formed for the purpose of oil and gas exploration and, if
warranted, development and exploitation. The Company is currently involved in a
joint exploration program which is engaged in the exploration for oil and
natural gas along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, onshore and in the shallow waters
of the Gulf of Mexico. The Company commenced its oil and gas activities through
such joint program in April 1996. NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESCheniere California was formed in December
1996 to acquire a working interest in undeveloped leases off Santa Barbara
County, California. This acquisition did not occur and Cheniere California is
currently inactive.
The Company is currently a development stage enterprise under the provisions
of SFAS No. 7. As described above and in Note 5, the Company's future business
will be in the field of oil and gas exploration, development, and exploitation.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cheniere
Energy, Inc. and its 100% owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Cheniere Energy Operating Co.,
Inc. and Cheniere Energy California, Inc. Accordingly, all references herein to
Cheniere Energy, Inc. or the "Company" include the consolidated results of its
subsidiary.subsidiaries. All significant intercompanyinter-company accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation
On July 3, 1996, Cheniere, formerly Bexy Communications, Inc., acquired all
of the outstanding capital stock of Cheniere Operating as described in Note 3.
For accounting purposes, this acquisition has been treated as a recapitalization
of Cheniere Operating.
The financial statements presented include only the accounts of the Company
since Cheniere Operating's inception (February 21, 1996). While Cheniere
Operating did obtain a presence in the public market through the
recapitalization, it did not succeed to the business or assets of Bexy. For
this reason, the value of the shares issued to the former Bexy shareholders has
been deemed to be de minimis and, accordingly, no value has been assigned to
those shares.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas
properties. Accordingly, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration,
and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related overhead
costs, are capitalized.
All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated
future costs to develop proved reserves, will be amortized on the unit-of-
production method using estimates of proved reserves. Investments in unproved
properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved
reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment
occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are
impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs to be
amortized.
In addition, the capitalized costs are subject to a "ceiling test," which
basically limits such costs to the aggregate of the "estimated present value,"
discounted at a 10 percent interest rate, of future net revenues from proved
reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions, plus the lower of
cost or fair market value of unproved properties.
23
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of
capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would
significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved
reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in income.
Abandonments of properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized
costs with no loss recognized.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Repairs and maintenance costs
are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the
straight line method calculated to amortize the cost of assets over their
estimated useful lives, generally seven years.lives. Upon retirement or other disposition of property and
equipment, the cost and related depreciation will be removed from the accounts
and the resulting gains or losses recorded.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company places its cash in what it believes to be credit-worthy financial
institutions. However, cash balances may exceed FDIC insured levels at various
times during the year.
Cash Equivalents
The Company classifies all investments with original maturities of three
months or less as cash equivalents.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are providedProvisions for based on the liability method of accounting
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes". Deferred income taxes are recorded to reflectbased on taxes payable or refundable for the
tax consequencescurrent year and deferred taxes on future yearstemporary differences between the amount of
differencestaxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial reporting amountsstatements.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at
each year-end.currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the
deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled as
prescribed in FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." As changes
in tax laws or rate are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
Investments
The Company continually reviews its investments to determine that the
carrying values have not been impaired.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reportingreported period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Per Share of Common Stock
Per share amounts have been computed based on the average number of common
shares outstanding during the period.
Offering Costs
Offering costs consist primarily of placement fees, professional fees and
printing costs. These costs are charged against the proceeds of the sale of
common stock in the periods in which they occur.
Stock-Based Compensation
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation," encourages, but does not require companies to record
compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value.
The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using
the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
24
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 19961997
Employees," and related Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for
stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of
the Company's stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock.
Long-Lived Assets
In March 1995, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of," was issued (SFAS No. 121). SFAS No. 121 requires that long-
lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used or
disposed of by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. The Company has adopted this statement and determined that no
impairment loss need be recognized for applicable assets of continuing
operations.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new
statement titled, "Earnings Per Share" (SFAS No. 128). This statement is
effective for both interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 1997 and
specifies the computation, presentation, and disclosure requirements for
earnings per share for entities with publicly held common stock or potential
common stock. After the effective date, all prior-period EPS data presented
shall be restated to conform with the provisions for SFAS No. 128.
If the provisions of SFAS No. 128 had been adopted in these financial
statements, there would not have been any impact on loss per share, since the
effect of the options and warrants would have been antidilutive.
NOTE 3--PROPERTY2-PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment at August 31 1996 consist of the following:
1997 1996
-------- --------
Furniture and Fixtures...........................................Fixtures $29,914 $26,006
Office Equipment.................................................Equipment 31,764 24,427
------- -------
61,678 50,433
Less Accumulated Depreciation....................................Depreciation 11,871 3,603
------- -------
Property and Equipment--Net......................................Equipment - Net $49,807 $46,830
======= =======
Depreciation Expense Recorded
In the Statement of Operations $ 8,268 $ 3,603
======= =======
NOTE 4--REORGANIZATION3-REORGANIZATION
On July 3, 1996, Cheniere Operating consummatedunderwent a reorganization by
consummating the transactions (the "Reorganization") contemplated in the
Agreement and Plan orof Reorganization (the "Reorganization Agreement") dated
April 16, 1996, between Cheniere Operating and Bexy Communications, Inc., a
publicly held Delaware corporation ("Bexy"). Under the terms of the
Reorganization Agreement, Bexy transferred its existing assets and liabilities
to Mar Ventures, Inc., its wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary ("Mar Ventures"),. Bexy
received 100% of the outstanding shares of Cheniere Operating (which aggregated
824.2422 common shares outstanding prior to a 10,000-to-1 stock split which was
effected immediately prior to the Reorganization) and the former shareholders of
Cheniere Operating received approximately 8.3 million8,242,422 newly issued shares of Bexy common stock,
representing 93% of the then issued and outstanding Bexy shares. Immediately
following the Reorganization, the Original Bexy Stockholders held the remaining
7%600,945 shares (7%) of the outstanding Bexy stock. The mentioned stock split
has been given retroactive effect in the financial statements. As a result of
the completion of the share exchange a change in the control of the Company
occurred. The transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of
Cheniere Operating. In accordance with the terms of the Reorganization
Agreement, Bexy changed its name to Cheniere
25
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
Energy, Inc. Subsequently, the Company distributed the outstanding capital
stock of Mar Ventures to the original holders of Bexy common stock.
NOTE 5--INVESTMENT4-OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES NOT SUBJECT TO AMORTIZATION
The Company is currently participating in oil and gas exploration activities
onshore and in the state waters of Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and in the
adjacent federal waters of the West Cameron Area. At August 31, 1997, a
determination cannot be made about the extent of any gas oil and gas reserves
that should be classified as proved reserves as a result of this project.
Consequently, the associated property costs and exploration costs have been
excluded in computing amortization of the full cost pool. The Company estimates
that amortization of these costs will begin during the calendar year 1998.
Unevaluated properties of $13,500,00 and $4,000,000 at August 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively, consist primarily of expenditures for leasehold and seismic
costs.
NOTE 5-INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTUREEXPLORATION PROGRAM
The Company has entered into a joint exploration program pursuant to an
Exploration Agreement between the Company and Zydeco Exploration, Inc.
("Zydeco"), an operating subsidiary of Zydeco Energy, Inc. (the "Exploration
Agreement"), with regard to a new proprietary 3-D seismic exploration project in
southern Louisiana (the "3-D Joint Venture"Exploration Program"). The Company has the right
to earn up to a 50% participation in the 3-D Joint Venture.Exploration Program.
The Company believes
that the 3-D seismic survey (the "Survey") is the first of its size within the
Transition Zone of Louisiana, an area extending a fewcovers 228 square miles on either side of
the Louisiana State coastline.
The Survey is to be conducted over certain areas located within a total295
square-mile area of approximately 255 squarerunning three to five miles running 5 miles southnorth and generally 3 to 5five miles
northsouth of the coastline in the most westerly 28 miles of West Cameron Parish,
Louisiana (the "Survey AMI"). The 3-D Joint Venture does not currently
have rights to surveyField acquisition of the entire Survey AMIseismic data was
completed in July 1997, and the extentdata is currently being processed and
interpreted.
As of the Survey AMI
whichAugust 31, 1997 and 1996, payments made to the 3-D Joint Venture will be entitled to survey is dependent upon its
ability to obtain survey permitsExploration Program
totaled $13,500,000 and similar rights. Currently, the 3-D Joint
Venture has permits and similar rights to survey approximately 67% of the
Survey AMI and is attempting to acquire rights to Survey additional portions
of the Survey AMI. There is no assurance that the 3-D Joint Venture will
successfully obtain rights to survey additional portions of the Survey AMI,
nor that it will be successful in acquiring farmouts, lease options (other
than those already obtained), leases, or other rights to explore or recover
oil and gas.$4,000,000 respectively.
Under the terms of the Exploration Agreement and its amendments, the Company
is required to make monthly paymentsan additional payment estimated to be approximately $2.9
million to Zydeco on December 31, 1997, to earn its full 50% participation in
the 3-D Joint Venture aggregating, at least, $13
million.Exploration Program. The Company's potential participation in the 3-D
Joint VentureExploration Program could be significantly reduced in the event of a failure by the Company to
make such required monthly paymentspayment when due.
The Company's investment (reserves) in the 3-D Exploration Program will be
accounted for under the full cost method. The Company's financial statements
will reflect its proportionate interest in the revenues, costs, expenses, and
capital with respect to the 3-D Exploration Program.
NOTE 6-NOTES PAYABLE
1) On July 31, 1997, Cheniere Operating borrowed $500,000 from a related party,
evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 10% per annum and due on
August 29, 1997. On August 28, 1997, the maturity date was extended to
September 29, 1997. (See Note 13).
The promissory note is secured by:
A) An undivided 1.8519 interest in seismic data acquired pursuant to the
Exploration Agreement. (See Note 5.)
B) An undivided 1.8519% interest in the leases covered by the Exploration
Agreement.
C) An undivided 3.7038% interest in proceeds from the marketing of seismic
data under the Exploration Agreement.
26
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1996
NOTE 6--NOTES PAYABLE
In1997
The Company has granted the maker of the note an option to acquire an
interest in the Seismic Data, Lease Interests, and Exploration Agreement
through the conversion of the note as follows:
a. The interest acquired upon conversion in Seismic Data and Lease Interests
is determined by dividing the amount due under the note by $13,500,000,
and multiplying the result by 50% (the "Data Ownership Percentage").
b. The interest acquired upon conversion in the proceeds from the marketing
of proprietary seismic data under the Exploration Agreement would be a
fraction equal to twice the Data Ownership Percentage.
c. Upon conversion, the maker will agree to pay a fractional share of Excess
Costs (per the Exploration Agreement) equal to the Data Ownership
Percentage.
d. The Option may be exercised only after September 29, 1997. Should the
Note be repaid before such time, the Option would terminate.
e. The Option will terminate at the earlier of 180 days from July 31, 1997,
or upon repayment of the note.
2) During June 1996, Cheniere Operating borrowed $425,000 through a private
placement of short termshort-term promissory notes with an initial interest rate of 8%
(the "Notes"). The Notes arenotes were due on September 14, 1996 (the "Maturity
Date"). In connection with the placement of the Notes, Cheniere Operating
issued warrants, which, following the Reorganization, were exchanged for an
aggregate of 141,666 and 2/3 (as adjusted for the 10,000-to-1 stock split
referred to in Note 3) warrants to purchase shares of the Common Stock, to
the holders of the Notesnotes (the "Noteholders"), each of which warrants
entitles the holder to purchase one share of the Common Stock at an exercise
price of $3.00 per share at any time on or before June 14, 1999. APursuant to
APB 14, the warrants issued have been valued at the differential rate
between the initial interest rate (8%) and the estimated market rate (20%),
applied to the principal balance. This value, $12,750, has been credited to
additional paid-in capital.
Terms of the Notes indicate that a failure by the Company to pay all amounts
due and payable under the Notes by the Maturity dateDate constitutes an event of
default thereunder. In such an event of default, the interest rate
applicable to any outstanding Notes would increase to 13%. In addition, the
holders of such outstanding Notes would be entitled to receive up to an
aggregate of 42,500 additional warrants (on similar terms) for each month,
or partial month any amounts remain due and payable following the Maturity
date,Date, up to a maximum aggregate number of 170,000 such additional warrants.
The proceeds from the placement of the Notes were applied toward
professional expenses and used for working capital.
Effective as of September 14, 1996, certain of the Noteholders converted
their Notes into Common Stock at a price of $2.00 per share. As a result,
105,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to retire $210,000 of Notes.
In addition, an individual Noteholder purchased the promissory notes of the
remaining Noteholders. The holder thus held Notes totaling $215,000. As per
the terms of the Notes (as described above), the interest rate on these
outstanding Notes increased to 13% per annum, effective September 14, 1996.
The holder of the Notes was also entitled to receive up to an aggregate of
21,500 additional warrants for each month or partial month any amounts
remain due and payable after September 14, 1996, up to a maximum aggregate
number of 86,000 such additional warrants.
On December 13, 1996, the Company repaid the $215,000 Notes and related
accrued interest. Upon repaying the Notes, the Company issued 64,500
warrants in accordance with the loan agreement. Pursuant to APB14, these
additional warrants have been valued at the differential rate between the
rate charged (13%) and the then estimated market rate (25%), applied to the
principal balance for each month outstanding after September 14, 1996. This
value, $6,450, has been credited to additional paid-in capital.
27
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
NOTE 7--INCOME7-INCOME TAXES
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
August 31,
----------------
1997 1996
----- -----
Current Tax Expense
U.S. Federal $ - $ -
State and Local - -
----- -----
Total Current - -
----- -----
Deferred Tax Expense
U.S. Federal - -
State and Local - -
----- -----
Total Deferred - -
----- -----
Total Tax Provision from Continuing Operations $ - $ -
===== =====
The reconciliation of the effective income tax rate to the federal statutory
rate is as follows:
Federal Income Tax Rate (34.0)% (34.0)%
Deferred Tax Charge (Credit) - -
Effect of Valuation Allowance 34.0 % 34.0 %
State Income Tax, Net of Federal Benefit - -
----- -----
Effective Income Tax Rate 0.0 % 0.0 %
===== =====
At August 31, 1996,1997, the Company had net carryforward losses of approximately
$1,020,000.$2,545,000. A valuation allowance equal to the tax benefit for deferred taxes
has been established due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of the tax
carryforward.carryfoward.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant
components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities at August 31 1996 are
as follows:
August 31,
-------------------------
1997 1996
--------- ----------
Deferred Tax Assets
Loss Carryforwards............................................Carryforwards $ 347,000865,000 $ 295,000
Less: Valuation Allowance...................................... (347,000)Allowance (865,000) (295,000)
--------- ---------
Net Deferred Tax Assets........................................Assets $ --- $ -
========= =========
Net operating loss carryforwards expire starting in 2006 through 2011. Per
year availability of losses incurred prior to July 3, 1996, of approximately
$747,000 is subject to change of ownership limitations under Internal Revenue
Code Section 382.
28
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
NOTE 8--WARRANTS8-WARRANTS
The Company has issued and outstanding certain386,666 and 2/3 warrants described
herein.
The Company has issued and outstanding 141,666 and 2/3 warrants
(collectively, the "June Warrants"), each of which entitles the registered
holder thereof to purchase one share of Common Stock. The June Warrants are
exercisable at any time on or before June 14, 1999, at an exercise price of
$3.00 per share (subject to customary anti-dilutionantidilution adjustments). The exercise
price was determined at a 100% premium to the sale price of Cheniere Operating
stock by private placement during May, 1996. The June Warrants were originally
issued by Cheniere Operating and were converted to warrants of Cheniere
following the Reorganization. The June Warrants were issued to a group of 11
investors in connection with a private placement of unsecured promissory notes of Cheniere Operating innotes.
Pursuant to APB 14, the aggregatewarrants issued have been valued at the differential
rate between the initial interest rate (8%) and the estimated market rate (20%),
applied to the principal amount of $425,000. The notes mature onbalance. This value, $12,750, has been credited to
additional paid-in capital.
Effective September 14, 1996, (the "Maturity
Date"). In the event that the Company fails to payhad not paid all amounts due and
payable under the Notes by the Maturity Date, in addition to an increase inDate. Certain of the applicable interest rate,noteholders
converted their notes into 105,000 shares of common stock. An individual note
holder purchased the holdersPromissory Notes of any outstandingthe remaining noteholders. As per the
terms of the Notes, would bethe holder was entitled to
27
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
AUGUST 31, 1996 receive up to an aggregate of
42,50021,500 additional warrants (on similar terms) for each month, or partial month, any amounts
remainremained due and payable following
the Maturity Date,after September 14, 1996, up to a maximum aggregate
number of 170,00086,000 such additional warrants. These Notes were repaid on December
14, 1996, and upon repayment the Company issued 64,500 warrants in accordance
with the loan agreement. The terms of the warrants are similar to the June
Warrants. Pursuant to APB 14, these additional warrants have been valued at the
differential rate between the rate charged (13%) and the then estimated market
rate (25%), applied to the principal balance for each month outstanding after
September 14, 1996. This value, $6,450, has been credited to additional paid-in
capital.
In consideration of certain investment advisory and other services to the
Company, pursuant to warrant agreements, each dated as of August 21, 1996, the
Company issued warrants to purchase 13,600 and 54,400 shares of Common Stock,
(collectively the "Adviser Warrants"). The Adviser Warrants are exercisable at
any time on or before May 15, 1999, at an exercise price of $3.00 per share
(subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments). The exercise price represents
the approximate market price of the underlying Common Stock at the time of the
transaction.
In connection with the July and August 1996 placement of 508,400 shares of
Common Stock, the Company agreed to issueissued warrants to purchase 12,500 shares of Common
Stock to one of two distributors who placed the shares. Such warrants are
exercisable on or before the second anniversary of the sale of the shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.125 per share (subject to customary
anti-dilution adjustments). In late August 1996,The exercise price represents the Company sold 100,000 units, each such unit
consistingapproximate
market price of 5 shares ofthe underlying Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one shareat the time of Common Stock. Each such warrant is exercisable on or before September 1, 1999
at an exercise price of $3.125 per share (subject to customary anti-dilution
adjustments).the transaction.
The Warrantswarrants do not confer upon the holders thereof any voting or other
rights of a stockholder of the Company.
29
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
NOTE 9--STOCK9-STOCK OPTIONS
The Company hashad granted certain options to purchase shares of Common Stock to
2 executives.two executives during the period ended August 31, 1996. Such options aggregate
300,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share. The options vest and
are exercisable as follows:
1) 75,000 qualified options vest and become exercisable on June 1, 1997, and
expire June 1, 2001.
2) 75,000 qualified options vest and become exercisable on June 1, 1998, and
expire June 1, 2001.
3) 150,000 qualified options vest and become exercisable in equal annual
installments of 25% each on the first through fourth anniversary of July 16,
1996, and expire July 16, 2001.
In addition, the Company has granted qualified options to thea former President
of Bexy, Mr. Buddy Young, during the Company.period ended August 31, 1996. The holder
has the option to acquire 19,444 and 2/3 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $1.80 per share. The options expire November 11, 2003.
Also, the Company had granted 12,000 non-qualified options to an employee at
an exercise price of $3.00 per share during the fiscal year ended August 31,
1997. These options vested and became exercisable in equal annual installments
of 25% each on the first through the fourth anniversary of January 23, 1997, and
expire January 23, 2002. This employee left the Company in May, 1997, and these
options have been canceled.
The disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 do not have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Stock option activity is summarized as follows:
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
August 31,
----------------------------------
1997 1996
------------ -------------
Outstanding at beginning of year 319,444 2/3 -
Options granted at an exercise price
of $3.00 per share 12,000 300,000
Options granted at an exercise price
of $1.80 per share - 19,444 2/3
Options canceled (12,000.00) -
------------ ------------
Outstanding at end of year 319,444 2/3 319,444 2/3
============ ============
Exercisable at end of year 131,944 2/3 19,444 2/3
============ ============
Weighted average exercise price of
options outstanding $ 2.93 $ 2.93
============ ============
Weighted average exercise price of
options exercisable $ 2.82 $ 1.80
============ ============
Weighted average remaining contractual
life of options outstanding 4.0 years 4.0 years
30
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
NOTE 10--COMMON10-COMMON STOCK RESERVED
The Company has reserved 322,166386,666 and 2/3 shareshares of Common Stock for insuranceissuance
upon the exercise of outstanding warrants (See Note 8).
The Company has reserved 319,444 and 2/3 shares of Common Shares for
insurance upon the exercise of outstanding options (See Note 9).
28
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
AUGUSTNOTE 11-RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On July 31, 1996
NOTE 11--DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As of March 1, 1996,1997, the Company decided to discontinue its then present
operationsborrowed $500,000 in the television productions and health information business.a transaction more fully
described in Note 6. The assets and liabilities relatingmaker of this Note is Sam B. Myers, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of Zydeco Energy, Inc., a subsidiary of which is Zydeco
Exploration, a party to the discontinued operations were
distributed on July 3, 1996. No assets or liabilities from the discontinued
operations are includedJoint Exploration Program described in the consolidated balance sheet as of August 31,
1996.
Revenues, related losses and income tax benefit associated with the
discontinued business are as follows:
For the period September 1, 1995 to February 29, 1996:
Revenue....................................................... $ 42,258
=========
Loss From Operations (Net of Income Tax Benefit of $0)........ $(149,080)
=========
For the period March 1, 1996 to July 3, 1996:
Revenue..................................................... $ 7,500
=========
Loss on Disposal (Net of Income Tax Benefit of $0).......... $ (58,642)
=========
The Loss on Disposal consists of the loss from operations during the period
of disposal.Note 6.
NOTE 12--COMMITMENTS12-COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
1) The Company subleases its Houston, Texas headquarters from Zydeco under a
month-to-month sublease.
Rent expense recorded in the financial statements is as follows:
August 31,
---------------------
1997 1996
--------- ----------
Office Rental (including parking) $22,403 $ 3,884
Other Rental Property (terminated June, 1997) 48,000 13,920
------- -------
$70,403 $17,804
======= =======
2) OnPursuant to a Consulting Agreement dated as of July 26,3, 1996, between the
Company signedand Buddy Young, the former President and Chief Executive Officer of
Bexy; the Company engaged Mr. Young as a Letterconsultant to provide management of
Intentthe Company with Poseidon
Petroleum, LLC ("Poseidon")advice regarding the management and business of the Company.
Mr. Young agreed to purchase Poseidon's 47% working interest in
undeveloped reservesprovide such consulting services to the Company for two
years ending on July 3, 1998, at a rate of $75,000 per year. Mr. Young is not
an employee of the Company and serves only in the Bonito unitcapacity of a consultant.
3) As discussed in Note 5, the Pacific Outer Continental
Shelf, offshore Santa Barbara County, California. The parties are conducting
due diligence and are negotiating a definitive purchase and sale agreement and
related documentation. The transactions contemplatedCompany is required to make an additional payment
estimated to be approximately $2.9 million to Zydeco on December 31, 1997 to
earn its full 50% participation in the Letter3-D Exploration Program. The Company's
potential participation in the 3-D Exploration Program could be reduced in
the event of Intent
may be terminateda failure by either party upon the occurrence of certain events and
there can be no assurance that the Company will successfully consummateto make such transactions. Moreover, if such transactions are consummated,required payment when due.
NOTE 13-SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
1) On September 22, 1997, the Company expects that development ofrepaid the reserves will not occur for at least five
years. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully develop
the reserves or that the reserves will yield sufficient quantities of oil and
gas to be economically viable.
NOTE 13--SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Effective as of September 14, 1996, certain of the$500,000 promissory note holders
described in Note 6, converted their notes into common stock at a price of $2 per share. As
a result, 105,000 shares were issuedincluding all accrued interest. The collateral securing
the Note has been released and, according to retire $210,000 of notes.
In addition, an individual note holder has purchased the promissory notes of
the remaining note holders. The holder thus holds notes totaling $215,000. As
per the terms of the notes,Note, the
maker's option to acquire an interest rate on these outstanding notesin the Seismic Data, Lease Interest and
Exploration Agreement has increasedbeen terminated.
2) During September 1997, pursuant to 13% per annum, effective September 14, 1996. The holderRegulation S promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, the notes is also entitled to receive up toCompany sold an aggregate of 21,500 additional
warrants (as described in Note 6)197,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock for gross proceeds of $591,000 and net proceeds of
$531,900.
31
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 1997
3) On September 29, 1997, the Company's Board of Directors elected a new outside
director. This director was granted options to purchase 25,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, the quoted
market price on the date of the grant. These options vest 12,500 on September
29, 1998, and 12,500 on September 29, 1999, and will expire on September 29,
2002.
4) On September 29, 1997, the Company granted to each month, or partial month, any
amounts remain dueof two outside directors
options to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an
exercise price of $3.00 per share, the quoted market price on the date of
grant. These options will vest one year from the date of grant and payablewill
expire five years after September 14, 1996, up to a maximum
aggregate numberthe date of 86,000 such additional warrants.
29the grant.
32
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENT WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
None.DISCLOSURE
A current report on Form 8-K was filed June 9, 1997, relating to a change in
the Registrant's Certifying Accountant.
On July 3, 1996, Cheniere Operating consummated the transactions (the
"Reorganization") contemplated in the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the
"Reorganization Agreement") dated April 16, 1996, between Cheniere Operating and
Bexy Communications, Inc., a publicly held Delaware corporation ("Bexy"). Under
the terms of the Reorganization Agreement, Bexy transferred its existing assets
and liabilities to Mar Ventures Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary ("Mar
Ventures"), Bexy received 100% of the outstanding shares of Cheniere Operating
(which aggregated 824.2422 common shares outstanding prior to a 10,000-to-1
stock split which effected immediately prior to the reorganization) and the
former shareholders of Cheniere Operating received 8,242,422 newly issued shares
of Bexy common stock, representing 93% of the then issued and outstanding Bexy
shares. Immediately following the Reorganization, the Original Bexy
Stockholders held the remaining 600,945 (7%) of the outstanding Bexy stock. As
a result of the completion of the share exchange a change in the control of the
Company occurred. The transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization
of Cheniere Operating. In accordance with the terms of the Reorganization
Agreement, Bexy changed its name to Cheniere Energy, Inc. Subsequently, the
Company distributed the outstanding capital stock of Mar Ventures to the
original holders of Bexy common stock.
Prior to the Reorganization, Bexy had retained Farber & Haas as Bexy's
independent auditors and Cheniere Operating had retained Merdinger, Fruchter,
Rosen & Corso P.C. as Cheniere Operating's independent auditors. Due to the fat
that it was the business of Cheniere Operating, and not Bexy, which survived the
Reorganization, management of Cheniere deemed it to be in the best interest of
Cheniere to continue Cheniere Operating's relationship with Merdinger, Fruchter,
Rosen & Corso PC. And to terminate Cheniere Operating's relationship with Farber
& Hass as of July 3, 1996.
The reports of Farber & Hass on the financial statements of Bexy for the past
two fiscal years did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion,
nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or
accounting principles.
The decision to change accountants was not formally approved by the board of
directors of Cheniere, due to the fact that management of Cheniere did not
consider the dismissal of Farber & Hass and the continuation of Cheniere
Operating's relationship with Merdinger, Fruchter, Rosen & Corso P.C. to be a
substantive change in accountants.
During the two most recent fiscal years of Bexy, and the interim period prior
to dismissal of Farber & Hass, there were no disagreements with Farber & Hass on
any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of Farber & Hass, would have caused Farber & Hass to make reference
to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report.
At no time prior to the Reorganization did Bexy have any relationship with
Merdinger, Fruchter, Rosen & Corso P.C.
33
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
TheREGISTRANT
As permitted by General Instruction G, the information called for in this item
with respect to the Company's directors is incorporated by reference from the
Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year. Information with respect to
the Company's executive officers and directorsis set forth in Part 1 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K under the heading "Executive Officers of the Company are as follows:
NAME AGE TITLE
- ---- --- -----
William D. Forster.......... 50 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Walter L. Williams.......... 68 Vice Chairman and Director
Keith F. Carney............. 40 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Charif Souki................ 43 Secretary and Director
Efrem Zimbalist III......... 49 Director
William D. Forster, 50, is currently President and Chief Executive Officer
of Cheniere. Mr. Forster was an investment banker with Lehman Brothers from
1975 to 1990 (11 years as a Managing Director), initially in the oil and gas
department for seven years, and then in various other areas. In 1990, he
founded his own private investment bank, W. Forster & Co. Inc. In 1994, he
became active again in the oil and gas business when he began to work together
with BSR Investments, Ltd., a Paris-based private investment company, to
provide financing for small energy companies. Mr. Forster is a director of
Equity Oil Company, a Nasdaq National Market company, and he serves on the
Board of Trustees of Mystic Seaport Museum. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree
in economics from Harvard College and a Master of Business Administration
degree from Harvard Business School.
Walter L. Williams, 68, is currently Vice-Chairman of Cheniere. Prior to
joining Cheniere, Mr. Williams spent 32 years as a founder and later Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Texoil, Inc., a publicly held Gulf Coast
exploration and production company. Prior to that time he was an independent
petroleum consultant. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in petroleum
engineering from Texas A&M University in 1949 and is a Registered Engineer in
both the states of Louisiana and Texas. He serves on the board of directors of
Texoil, Inc. and has served as a Director and Member of the Executive
Committee of the Board of the Houston Museum of Natural Science.
Keith F. Carney, 40, is currently Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
Cheniere. Prior to joining Cheniere, Mr. Carney was a securities analyst in
the oil & gas exploration/production sector with Smith Barney, Inc. from 1992-
1996. From 1982-1990 he was employed by Shell Oil as an exploration geologist,
with assignments in the Gulf of Mexico, the Middle East and other areas. He
received a Master of Science degree in geology from Lehigh University in 1982
and a Master of Business Administration/Finance degree from the University of
Denver in 1992.
Charif Souki, 43, is currently the Secretary and a Director of Cheniere. Mr.
Souki is an independent investment banker with twenty years of experience in
the industry. In the past few years he has specialized in providing financing
for promising microcap and small capitalization companies with an emphasis on
the oil and gas industry. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate
University and a Master of Business Administration from Columbia University.
Efrem Zimbalist III, 49, a director of Cheniere, is President and Chief
Executive Officer of Times Mirror Magazines, a division of Times Mirror Co.,
and a Vice President of Times Mirror Co. He formerly served as vice president,
strategic development for Times Mirror Co. from 1993 to 1995. Previously he
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Correia Art Glass, Inc., a
family owned business. He also served five years as a senior engagement
manager at the management consulting firm of McKinsey and Co., Inc. in Los
Angeles. Mr. Zimbalist received a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from
Harvard College and a Master's degree in business administration from Harvard
Business School.
30
Registrant."
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Simultaneously withAs permitted by General Instruction G, the reorganization of Bexy with Cheniere Operating (the
"Reorganization"), allinformation called for in this item
is incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the officers of Bexy resigned from their respective
offices and were replaced by the current officers of the Company. As the
Company has divested itself of the assets relating to the business of Bexy
prior to the Reorganization and has shifted to a new business, this section
describes the compensation to be received by the executive officers of the
Company following the Reorganization on July 3, 1996. The Company presently
has no employment agreement with any of the Executive Officers.
William D. Forster, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Charif Souki, Secretary of the Company, have not received any compensation
in the form of salary or options and the Company does not currently intend to
pay any such compensation to such officers until the Company has raised
significant additional capital. In addition, Mr. Forster and Mr. Souki have
not been reimbursed for any travel or entertainment expense incurred on behalf
of Cheniere, nor has any such expense been accrued. The Company provides an
apartment for the use of Mr. Forster and Mr. Souki during times they are in
Houston at a total cost of $4,800 per month. Directors receive no remuneration
for serving on the board of directors of the Company.
Walter L. Williams, Vice Chairman of the Company, began receiving a salary
of $120,000 per year on September 1, 1996. By resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Company dated July 3, 1996, the Company granted to Mr.
Williams certain options to purchase shares of the Common Stock as described
below. In addition, the Company granted 30,000 shares of the Common Stock to
Mr. Williams on July 3, 1996, which shares have not yet been issued. Keith F.
Carney, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, began receiving
a salary of $90,000 per year on July 16, 1996, the date of his appointment as
an officer of the Company. By resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Company dated July 23, 1996, the Company granted to Mr. Carney certain options
to purchase shares of Common Stock as described below.
31
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR. The following table sets forth certain
information with respect to individual grants of stock options made during thelast
fiscal year ended August 31, 1996 to each of the named executive officers.
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT
ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF
STOCK PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS OPTION TERMS($)(1)
------------------------------- -------------------------------
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES % OF TOTAL EXERCISE
UNDERLYING OPTIONS OR BASE
OPTIONS GRANTED TO PRICE EXPIRATION 5% 10%
NAME GRANTED(#) EMPLOYEES ($/SH) DATE APPRECIATION($) APPRECIATION($)
- ---- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------------- ---------------
William D. Forster...... -- -- -- -- -- --
Walter L. Williams...... 75,000(2) 25.0 3.00 6/1/01 76,522 173,601
75,000(3) 25.0 3.00 6/1/01 91,598 213,461
Keith F. Carney......... 37,500(4) 12.5 3.00 7/16/01 38,261 86,801
37,500(4) 12.5 3.00 7/16/01 45,799 106,731
37,500(4) 12.5 3.00 7/16/01 53,714 128,654
37,500(4) 12.5 3.00 7/16/01 62,024 152,769
- --------
(1) The indicated dollar amounts are the result of calculations based on the
exercise price of each option and assume five and ten percent annual
appreciation rates set by the Securities and Exchange Commission over the
term of the option and, therefore, are not intended to forecast possible
future appreciation, if any, of the Company's stock price.
(2) Each of these stock options vest and become exercisable on June 1, 1997
and expire five years from the date of grant.
(3) Each of these stock options vest and become exercisable on June 1, 1998
and expire five years from the date of grant.
(4) The Company granted Mr. Carney 150,000 stock options on July 23, 1996. The
options vest and become exercisable in equal annual installments of 25%
each on the first through fourth anniversaries of July 16, 1996, and
expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUE
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
outstanding stock options as of August 31, 1996 for each of the named
executive officers.
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
OPTIONS AT 8/31/96 (#) AT 8/31/96 ($)
------------------------- -------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
William D. Forster.......... -- -- -- --
Walter L. Williams.......... -- 150,000 -- 37,500(1)
Keith F. Carney............. -- 150,000 -- 37,500(1)
- --------
(1) Market value of underlying securities at fiscal year-end 8/31/96 ($3.25),
minus the exercise price.
32
year.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certainAs permitted by General Instruction G, the information regardingcalled for in this item
is incorporated by reference from the ownershipCompany's definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the Common Stock, of: (i) each person known by the Company to own
beneficially five percent or more of the outstanding Common Stock at November
22, 1996; (ii) each of the Company's directors; (iii) each of the executive
officers of the Company; and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the
Company as a group.
SHARES BENEFICIALLY
OWNED PRIOR TO THE
OFFERING
---------------------------
PERCENTAGE
OF SHARES
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER NUMBER OUTSTANDING
------------------------ --------- -----------
William D. Forster................................. 2,846,211(1) 26.8%
BSR Investments, Ltd............................... 2,602,000 24.5%
Charif Souki....................................... 0(2) --
Walter L. Williams................................. 30,000(3)(4) .3%
Keith F. Carney.................................... 0(3) --
Efrem Zimbalist III................................ 20,000 .2%
All directors and executive officers as a group (5
persons).......................................... 2,896,211(1)(2) 27.3%
- --------
(1) Does not include 100,000 shares held by a trust for the benefit of Mr.
Forster's mother of which trust Mr. Forster is a 20% remainderman and of
which shares he disclaims beneficial ownership.
(2) Does not include 2,602,000 shares held by BSR Investments, Ltd., an entity
under the control of a member of Mr. Souki's immediate family, of which
shares Mr. Souki disclaims beneficial ownership.
(3) Does not include 150,000 shares of the Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of options, not exercisable within 60 days of the date of this
Prospectus, held by each of Mr. Williams and Mr. Carney.
(4) The 30,000 shares of the Common Stock held by Mr. Williams have been
granted by the Company, but have not yet been issued.last
fiscal year.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
BSR Investments, Ltd. ("BSR"), an entity holding approximately 24.5%As permitted by General Instruction G, the information called for in this item
is incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock, is under the control of a member of
the immediate family of Charif Souki, Secretary and a director of the Company.
Mr. Souki has been engaged, from time to time, as a consultant to BSR. In
addition, BSR has in the past provided certain financial advisory and other
services to the Company on an arm's length basis. Mr. Souki disclaims
beneficial ownership of all shares held by BSR.
33last
fiscal year.
34
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a.(a) Financial Statements, and Supplementary Data, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits
PAGE
----
1. Consolidated(1) Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report........................................ 19Report........................................18
Consolidated Balance Sheet.......................................... 20Sheet..........................................19
Consolidated Statement of Operations................................ 21Operations................................20
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity...................... 22Equity......................21
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows................................ 23-24Flows................................22
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.......................... 25-29
2. ConsolidatedStatements..........................23
(2) Financial Statement SchedulesSchedule
All consolidated financial statement schedules have been omitted
because they are not required, are not applicable, or the information
required has been included elsewhere herein.
3.elsewhere.
(3) Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
EXHIBITS
--------Exhibit No. Description
- ----------- -----------
3.1 --AmendedAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cheniere
Energy, Inc. ("Cheniere")* (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 of the Company's Registration Statement under the Securities
Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File No. 333-
10905))
3.2 --By-lawsBy-laws of Cheniere*Cheniere (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the Company's Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996
(File No. 333-10905))
4.1 --SpecimenSpecimen Common Stock Certificate of Cheniere*
5.1 --OpinionCheniere (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dewey Ballantine*the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.1 --ExplorationExploration Agreement between FX Energy, Inc. (now known as
Cheniere Energy Operating Co., Inc. ("Cheniere Operating")) and
Zydeco Exploration, Inc.* ("Zydeco") (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File
No. 333-10905))
10.2 --FirstFirst Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco Exploration, Inc.*(Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.3 --SecondSecond Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco Exploration, Inc.*(Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.4 --ThirdThird Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco Exploration, Inc.(Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Annual Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K
filed on November 27, 1996 (File No. 2-63115))
10.5 --FormForm of Regulation D Subscription Agreement between Cheniere
Operating and certain "accredited investors" (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Annual Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K
filed on November 27, 1996 (File No. 2-63115))
35
10.6 --FormForm of Noteholders'Noteholders Agreement ("Noteholders Agreement") between Cheniere Operating and the holders of
promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $425,000.00*$425,000
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-
1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.7 --FormForm of Warrant Agreement governing warrants of Cheniere issued in
exchange for warrants of Cheniere Operating (which were issued
pursuant to the Noteholders Agreement)* (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File
No. 333-10905))
10.8 --AssetAsset Transfer, Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Bexy
Communications, Inc. and MarsMar Ventures, Inc.* (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.9 --IndemnificationIndemnification Agreement amongbetween Buddy Young, Cheniere, Cheniere
Energy Operating Co., Inc. and the Stockholdersshareholders of Cheniere Energy
Operating Co., Inc. named therein*therein
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-
1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.10 --FormForm of Warrant Agreement between Cheniere and each of C.M. Blair,
W.M. ForsterFoster & Co., Inc. and Redliw Corp.* (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.11 --ConsultingConsulting Agreement between Cheniere and Buddy (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.12 Letter Agreement between Cheniere and Buddy Young regarding
reverse splits of the Common Stock*Stock (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 of the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10- filed on
November 27, 1996 (File No. 2-63115))
10.13 Fourth Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on March 17,
1997 (File No. 333-23421))
10.14 Form of Letter Agreement between Cheniere and certain purchasers
of Common Stock pursuant to Regulation S (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on March 17,
1997 (File No. 333-23421))
10.15 Form of Warrant Agreement governing warrants issued in unit
offering to each of Western Slopes, Ltd. and Great Heritage
Holdings, Ltd.
10.16 Form of Warrant Agreement between Cheniere and Reefs & Co., Ltd.
10.17 Form of Warrant Agreement governing warrants issued pursuant to
Noteholders Agreement
10.18 Fifth Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.19 Sixth Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.20 Form of Letter Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
regarding Promissory Note in the principal amount of $500,000
10.21 Form of Noteholder Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers,
Jr. relating to Promissory Note in the principal amount of
$500,000
10.22 Form of Security Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
relating to Promissory Note in the principal amount of $500,000
10.23 Seventh Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.24 Form of Letter Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
regarding Promissory Note Extension
21.1 --SubsidiariesSubsidiaries of Cheniere*
23.1 --ConsentCheniere Energy, Inc.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
36
(b) Reports On Form 8-K
The Company filed Current Reports on Form 8-K on June 9, 1997, regarding a
change in accountants, and on August 7, 1997, and August 25, 1997, each
regarding Sales of Dewey Ballantine (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
23.2 --Consent of Merdinger, Fruchter, Rosen & Corso, P.C.*
- --------
* Filed previously.
34Equity Securities Pursuant to Regulation S.
The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on June 25, 1997, regarding
amended interim financials.
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.
By: /s/ William D. Forster
By:__________________________________Walter L. Williams
----------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 26, 1996
35October 13, 1997
38
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
No.
-------
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cheniere Energy, Inc. ("Cheniere")*
3.2 By-laws of Cheniere*
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Cheniere*
5.1 Opinion of Dewey Ballantine*
10.1 Exploration Agreement between FX ENERGY, Inc. (now known as Cheniere Energy Operating Co., Inc.
(Cheniere Operating")) and Zydeco Exploration, Inc.*
10.2 First Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy, Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
Exploration Inc.*
10.3 Second Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy, Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.4 Third Amendment to the Exploration Agreement to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy, Inc. (now known as Cheniere
Operating) and Zydeco Exploration, Inc.
10.5 Form of Regulation D Subscription Agreement between Cheniere Operating and certain "accredited investors"
10.6 Form of Noteholders' Agreement ("Noteholders Agreement 11) between Cheniere Operating and the holders of promissory
notes in the aggregate principal amount of $425,000.00*
10.7 Form of Warrant Agreement governing warrants of Cheniere issued in exchange for warrants of Cheniere Operating (which
were issued pursuant to the Noteholders Agreement")*
10.8 Asset Transfer, Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Bexy Communications, Inc. and Mars Ventures Inc.*
10.9 Indemnification Agreement among Buddy Young, Cheniere, Cheniere Energy Operating Co., Inc. and the Stockholders of
Cheniere Energy Operating Co., Inc. named therein*
10.10 Form of Warrant Agreement between Cheniere and each of C.M. Blair, W.M. Forster & Co., Inc. and Redliw Corp.*
10.11 Consulting Agreement between Cheniere and Buddy Young regarding reverse splits of the Common Stock*
21.1 Subsidiaries of Cheniere*
23.1 Consent of Dewey Ballantine (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
23.2 Consent of Merdinger, Fruchter, Rosen & Corso, P.C.*
__________________
* Filed previously.
Exhibit No. Description
- ----------- -----------
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cheniere
Energy, Inc. ("Cheniere") (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
of the Company's Registration Statement under the Securities Act of
1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File No. 333-10905))
3.2 By-laws of Cheniere (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the Company's Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996
(File No. 333-10905))
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Cheniere (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.1 Exploration Agreement between FX Energy, Inc. (now known as
Cheniere Energy Operating Co., Inc. ("Cheniere Operating")) and
Zydeco Exploration, Inc. ("Zydeco") (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File
No. 333-10905))
10.2 First Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.3 Second Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.4 Third Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Annual Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K
filed on November 27, 1996 (File No. 2-63115))
10.5 Form of Regulation D Subscription Agreement between Cheniere
Operating and certain "accredited investors" (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Annual Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K
filed on November 27, 1996 (File No. 2-63115))
10.6 Form of Noteholders Agreement between Cheniere and the holders of
promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $425,000
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1
filed on August 27, 1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.7 Form of Warrant Agreement governing warrants of Cheniere issued in
exchange for warrants of Cheniere Operating (which were issued
pursuant to the Noteholders Agreement) (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File
No. 333-10905))
10.8 Asset Transfer, Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Bexy
Communications, Inc. and Mar Ventures, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.9 Indemnification Agreement between Buddy Young, Cheniere, Cheniere
Operating and the shareholders of Cheniere Operating named therein
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1
filed on August 27, 1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.10 Form of Warrant Agreement between Cheniere and each of C.M. Blair,
W.M. Foster & Co., Inc. and Redliw Corp. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27, 1996 (File
No. 333-10905))
10.11 Consulting Agreement between Cheniere and Buddy (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on August 27,
1996 (File No. 333-10905))
10.12 Letter Agreement between Cheniere and Buddy Young regarding reverse
splits of the Common Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 of the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10- filed on November 27,
1996 (File No. 2-63115))
1
10.13 Fourth Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company's Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on March 17,
1997 (File No. 333-23421))
10.14 Form of Letter Agreement between Cheniere and certain purchasers of
Common Stock pursuant to Regulation S (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 of the Company's Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 filed on March 17, 1997 (File
No. 333-23421))
10.15 Form of Warrant Agreement governing warrants issued in unit
offering to each of Western Slopes, Ltd. and Great Heritage
Holdings, Ltd.
10.16 Form of Warrant Agreement between Cheniere and Reefs & Co., Ltd.
10.17 Form of Warrant Agreement governing warrants issued pursuant to
Noteholders Agreement
10.18 Fifth Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.19 Sixth Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.20 Form of Letter Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
regarding Promissory Note in the principal amount of $500,000
10.21 Form of Noteholder Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
relating to Promissory Note in the principal amount of $500,000
10.22 Form of Security Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
relating to Promissory Note in the principal amount of $500,000
10.23 Seventh Amendment to the Exploration Agreement between FX Energy,
Inc. (now known as Cheniere Operating) and Zydeco
10.24 Form of Letter Agreement between Cheniere and Sam B. Myers, Jr.
regarding Promissory Note Extension
21.1 Subsidiaries of Cheniere Energy, Inc.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
2