- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                 UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549
 
                               ----------------
 
                                   FORM 10-K
 
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934 (Fee Required)
 
                    For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 19961998
                         Commission file number 1-7940
 
                        GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION
            (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
 
              DELAWARE                                 76-0466913
      (STATE OF INCORPORATION)(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
              Delaware                                 76-0466193
      (State of incorporation)            (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.Employer Identification No.)
 
 
     5847 SAN FELIPE, SUITESan Felipe, Suite 700
           Houston, Texas                                 77057
   HOUSTON, TEXAS                              (ZIP CODE)
   (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
              OFFICES)(Address of principal executive                      (Zip Code)
              offices)
 
     Registrant's telephone number, including area code is (713) 780-9494
 
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTEREDName of each exchange Title of each class on which registered ------------------- ----------------------- Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.20 par value.....................value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Series A Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value.........value NASDAQ Small Cap
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [_] At March 3, 1997,26, 1999 there were 41,804,5105,247,705 (adjusted for reverse stock split) shares of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation common stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 3, 199723, 1999 was approximately $22,081,000$5,903,668 based on a closing price of $0.8125$1.125 per share on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
DOCUMENT PART/ITEM OF INCORPORATIONDocument Part/Item of Incorporation -------- ------------------------------------------------------- Proxy Statement for the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Part III, Item 10, 11, 12, 13 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PART I ITEMSItems 1 ANDand 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES.Business and Properties. General Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and subsidiaries ("Goodrich" or "the Company") is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in the onshore portions of the United States, primarily the states of Louisiana and Texas. In addition to itsThe Company owns working and overriding royalty interests in 91 active oil and gas activities, Goodrich owns a 20% non- operated interestwells located in a Texas intrastate natural gas pipeline.37 fields in eight states. At December 31, 1996,1998, Goodrich had estimated proved reserves on a pro forma basis (see discussion of acquisition below) of approximately 2,652 Mbbls3,093,000 barrels of oil and condensate and 21.528.1 Bcf of natural gas, or an aggregate of 37.446.7 Bcfe with a pre-tax present value of future net revenues, discounted at 10%, of $83.17 million, of which approximately 83% are classified as proved developed. The Company owns working and overriding royalty interests in 87 oil and gas wells located in 41 active fields.$40.63 million. The Company's principal executive offices are located at 5847 San Felipe, Suite 700 Houston, Texas 77057. The Company also has offices in Shreveport, Louisiana. At March 3, 1997,2, 1999 the Company had 1116 employees. Company Background The CompanyGoodrich resulted from a business combination on August 15, 1995 between La/Cal Energy Partners ("La/Cal") and Patrick Petroleum Company and subsidiaries ("Patrick"). La/Cal was a privately held independent oil and gas partnership formed in July 1993 and engaged in the development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties, primarily in Southern Louisiana. Patrick was a NYSE-listed independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, production, development and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in the continental United States. Patrick's oil and gas operations and properties were primarily located in West Texas and Michigan at the time of the combination, with additional operations and properties in certain western states. On January 31, 1997, the Company acquired the oil and gas properties of La/Cal Energy Partners II ("La/Cal II") and certain working interest owners for a purchase price of $16.5 million ("La/Cal II Acquisition"). The acquired proved reserves consisted of 1,602,000 barrels of oil and 3,310,000 mcf of gas with 81% classified as proved developed. The related major fields acquired are located in South Louisiana and East Texas. The purchase price was comprised of $1.5 million in cash, the assumption of $7.5 million of La/Cal II long-term debt and the issuance of 750,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock of the Company ("Series B Preferred Stock") with an aggregate liquidation value of $7.5 million. The Series B Preferred Stock accrues dividends at a rate of 8.25% per annum and each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into 8.92 shares of common stock. Such shares are redeemable by the Company after January 31, 2001 at $10.00 per share. 2 Oil and Gas Operations and Properties The following is a summary description of the Company's oil and gas properties. Louisiana Substantially allThe majority of the Company's proved natural gas reserves are in the SouthSouthern Louisiana producing region. The Southern Louisiana producing region refers to the geographic area which covers the onshore and in-land waters of South Louisiana lying in the southern one-half of the state of Louisiana. The South Louisiana, producing regionwhich is one of the world's most prolific oil and natural gas producing sedimentary basins. The region generally contains sedimentary sandstones which are of high qualities of porosity and permeabilities. There are a myriad of types of reservoir traps found in the region. These traps are generally formed by faulting, folding and subsurface salt movement or a combination of one or more of these. Salt movement has resulted in a large number of shallow piercement salt domes as well as deeper movements, which have resulted in both large and small anticlinal structures. The formations found in the SouthSouthern Louisiana producing region range in depth from 1,000 feet to 20,000 feet below the surface. These formations range from the Sparta and Frio formations in the Northernnorthern part of the region to Miocene and Pleistocene in the Southernsouthern part of the region. The Company's production comes predominately from Miocene and Frio age formations. 2 Kings Ridge 96 Field. Kings Ridge 96 is located in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. King's Ridge Field was discovered by Natural Gas and Oil Company in 1954. The field is set up geologically by three main faults which strike east- west and create hydrocarbon traps on the downthrown side of the faults. Typically, these downthrown traps are three-way structures that produce from Miocene sands ranging in depth from 9,000' to 13,000'. Goodrich has acquired approximately 307 acres from the Lafourche Parish School Board and 114 acres from the Grandison Trust. Goodrich as operator has drilled and completed three wells in the field to date and has an approximate 50% working interest. Isle St. Jean Charles Field. Isle St. Jean Charles Field is located in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana. The field is a northwest extension of the Bayou Jean LaCroix Field located in the southeastern part of the Parish. These fields are trapped on a four-way closure downthrown on a major east-west trending down to the south fault. Production is from multiple Miocene-aged sands which are normally pressured and range in depth from 9,000 feet to 13,000 feet. The field was developed primarily in the 1950's by Exxon and reservoirs have exhibited both depletion and water drive mechanisms. To date, these fields have produced in excess of 51 billion cubic feet of gas and 6.52 million barrels of oil and condensate. There are currently five active wells producing in these fields. Goodrich acquired its working interest in its leasehold of approximately 425 acres through both acreage acquisitions and a farmout from Fina, et al. In December 1997, Goodrich drilled the Dupont 38 #1 well. Goodrich is operator and holds an approximate 38% working interest. Second Bayou Field. The Second Bayou Field is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana and was discovered in 1955 by the Sun Texas Company. Goodrich is the operator of seven producing wells, six of which are dually completed, and has an average working interest of approximately 29% in 1,395 gross acres. To date, the field has produced over 422 Bcf of natural gas and 2.7 million barrels of oil from multiple Miocene aged sands ranging from 4,000 to 15,200 feet. Goodrich drilled and dually completed the Miami Fee No. 9 and No. 10 during 1998 based off of subsurface control and 3-D seismic which was shot in 1997. The two wells average 1,052 barrels of oil per day and 1.5 million cubic feet of gas per day during December 1998. Other major operators in the area are Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Texaco Exploration and Producing , Inc. and Newfield Exploration. Lake Raccourci Field. The Lake Raccourci Field was discovered by Humble Oil and Refining Company ("Exxon") in 1949, with the field extended to the South by Pan American ("Amoco") in 1958. Geologically, the field is a large four-way dipping closure which is cross-cut by numerous Northeast-Southwest striking down to the South faults. The field has produced from a minimum of eighteen different Miocene age sandstones, which range in depth from 9,000'9,000 to 16,500'.16,500 feet. These normally and abnormally pressured reservoirs exhibit depletion, water and combination drive mechanisms, and have produced in excess of 830832 billion cubic feet of gas and 20 million barrels of oil and condensate. There are currently sixnine producing wells in the field. Goodrich acquired its average 20% working interest in the field through a farmout from MW Petroleum ("Apache") in July 1996. In October 1996 an agreement was reached with Exxon whereby they were allowed to participate as a working interest owner in the drilling of the Goodrich--State Lease 3258 No. 1 well in return for a contributing acreage to be included in a voluntary unit for the well. In addition to participating in the well, Exxon agreed to farmout an additional 320 acres ofand a separate prospectfarmout from Exxon. The Company controls approximately 1,079 acres in the field on State Lease 14589. The Companyand is currently controls approximately 3,800 acres and has plans to drill at least three additional wells in the field, including the State Lease 14589 prospect which is scheduledevaluating 3D seismic for drilling in the first quarter of 1997. In December 1996, Goodrich tested the State Lease 3258 No. 1 well in the Bol 6 sand at a rate of 5.3 million cubic feet of gas, 687 barrels of oil, and zero barrels of water per day on a 10/64 inch choke with a flowing tubing pressure of 9570# psi. The well encountered five additional productive sands with a total of approximately 100 feet of net pay. Independent reservoir engineers have assigned gross proved reserves of 25.9 Bcfe to the well. Goodrich owns an approximate 16% working interest in the well, with net reserves to the Company estimated at 3.3 Bcfe. South Pecan Lake Field. The South Pecan Lake Field was initially developed in the early 1950's by Amoco. South Pecan Lake Field, located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, is a faulted four-way closure separated from the Pecan Lake Field by a major down to the South, East-West trending fault. The field has produced predominately gas and gas condensate from multiple Miocene aged sand reservoirs ranging in depths from 4,000 feet to 15,000 feet. These reservoirs are generally characterized by strong water drive production mechanisms. The South Pecan Lake Field has produced in excess of 650 Bcf of gas and nine million barrels of oil and condensate. In addition to Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Apache is a major operator in the South Pecan Lake Field. 3 Goodrich acquired its interest through leasing approximately 384 acres and drilled the Miami Corporation 5 No. 1 in September 1996 and has a working interest of approximately 40%. The well was dually completed and tested at totals of 2.1 million cubic feet of gas and 192 barrels of oil per day. The dually completed well was turned to sales during January 1997. A development well is planned for the second quarter of 1997.further exploitation opportunities. Pecan Lake Field. The Pecan Lake Field was discovered in 1944 by the Superior Oil Company. Geologically, the field is comprised of a relatively low relief four-way closure and multiple stacked pay sands. The Pecan Lake Field comprises approximately 870 gross leased acres in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, approximately 42 miles southeast of Lake Charles, Louisiana. The field has produced from over 15 Miocene sands ranging in depths from 7,500 to 11,800 feet, which have been predominately gas and gas condensate reservoirs. These sand reservoirs are characterized by generally widespread development and strong waterdrive production mechanisms. The field has produced in excess of 345348 Bcf of gas and 622,000680,000 barrels of condensate. All the field production to date has come from reservoirs which are of normal pressure. In May 1992, La/Cal enteredThe Company is the Pecan Lake Field under a farmout arrangementoperator of five producing wells with Mobil, whereby Mobil retained a one-eighth overriding interest in the prospectively developed wells subject to the farmout. In April 1993, La/Cal leased an additional 133.24 gross acres in the Pecan Lake Field from Miami Corp. for approximately $62,000. In March 1994, La/Cal acquired (i) all of Mobil's interest in La/Cal's actual and prospectively drilled wells, (ii) a 43.10% working interest in Mobil's Miami Corp. S13, B15 and B16 wells, and (iii) a 2.26% overriding royalty interest in Mobil's Cutler No. 1 wells for approximately $2.1 million. Pecan Lake consists of seven well completions through four well bores. The Company's working interests rangeranging from approximately 43% to 47%. The Company's average daily production at Pecan Lake was 30.06 Bbls of oil and and/or condensate and 2.44 Mmcf of natural gas during 1996. As of December 31, 1996, the Company's interests in the Pecan Lake Field had proved reserves of 57.00 Mbbls of oil and condensate and 7.13 Bcf of natural gas.3 Ada Field. The Ada Field was discovered by Hope Producing Company in 1945. The field is located in Bienville Parish, in North Louisiana. Geologically, the field is a turtle feature between two salt domes exhibiting a four-way anticline with two main horst blocks, a main graben block, and several compensating faults. The field has produced from numerous Lower Cretaceous sands and lime facies, with the sands being predominately lenticular in deposition. The producing interval for the field ranges from 4,500'4,500 to 10,000',10,000 feet, with the production being primarily a pressure depletion mechanism. As of December 31, 1996, Ada Field has produced over 654656 Bcf of natural gas and 5.2 MMbblsmillion barrels of oil. Goodrich acquired itshas six producing wells in the field, two of which were drilled during 1998. Goodrich owns an approximate 43% working interest of approximately 40% through a farmout of various individual working interest owners. In September 1996,in the Youngblood No. 1 was drilled and dually completed. From September 15, 1996, first date of production, through December 31, 1996, the dually completed well has produced over 400 Mmcf of natural gas. Goodrich anticipates drilling a development well during the first quarter of 1997.field. Other. The Company maintains ownership interests in acreage and wells in several additional fields in Louisiana, including the (i) Opelousas field,Field, located in St. Landry Parish, Louisiana (ii) Sibley Field, located in Webster Parish, Louisiana and (iii) City of Lake Charles Field, located in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana. As a result of the La/Cal II Acquisition, the Company has added five additional Louisiana fields to its properties. Second Bayou Field. The Second Bayou(iv) Deep Lake Field, islocated in Lafourche Parish, (v) Mosquito Bay Field, located in Terrebonne Parish, (vi) South Pecan Lake Field located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana and was discovered in 1955 by the Sun Texas Company. Goodrich is the operator and has an average working interest of approximately 29% in 1,395 gross acres. To date, the field has produced over 420 Bcf of natural gas and two million barrels of oil from multiple Miocene aged sands ranging from 4,000 to 15,200. Goodrich currently has five producing wells and anticipates drilling an additional development well during the second quarter of 1997. Other major operators in the area are Fina Oil and Chemical Company and Texaco Producing Company. 4 Kings Ridge Field. The Kings Ridge(vii) Charenton Field is located in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana, and was discovered in 1957. The field has produced over 82 Bcf of natural gas and two million barrels of oil. Goodrich is operator and has approximately a 35% working interest in the current geological unit of 435 gross acres. Deep Lake Field. The Deep Lake Field is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and was discovered in 1952 by the Superior Oil Company. The field has produced over 1 Tcf of natural gas and 4.7 million barrels of oil. Goodrich is operator and has approximately 42% in 725 gross acres. Other major operators in the area are Mobil Oil Exploration and Production and Pennzoil Production Company. Mosquito Bay Field. The Mosquito Bay Field is located in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, and was discovered in 1961 by Forest Oil Company. The field has produced over 16 Bcf of natural gas and 200,000 barrels of oil. Goodrich is operator and has approximately 47% working interest in the current geological unit of 227 gross acres. Opelousas/Northcott Field. The Opelousas/Northcott Field is located in St. LandryMary Parish Louisiana, and was discovered(viii) E. Roanoke Field, located in 1960 by Magnolia Petroleum Company. The field has produced over 200 Bcf of natural gas.Jefferson Davis Parish. Texas Goodrich is operatorexplores and has approximately 53% working interestproduction in 1,023 gross acres. Texas Goodrich has oilthe western, eastern and gas properties in West Texas as a resultsouthern regions of former Patrick holdings and operations. Patrick'sTexas. The Company's primary exploration focus in thisWest Texas is in the Horseshoe Atol area was toward the development ofin Dawson and Gaines Counties. The Company is actively developing drilling prospects using three dimensional ("3-D") seismic technology. Recent industry advances in high-resolution 3-D seismic technology have facilitated an improvement inthrough the success rate for explorationintegration of smaller but prolific reefs. This has been accomplished by 3-D imaging the optimum drilling locations on these prospects, therefore minimizing edge and marginal well completions and improving the overall recoveries per well. Patrick participated in overapproximate 375 square miles of 3-D seismic acquisitionit owns in West Texas, and drilled Pennsylvanian ("Penn") Reef and Fusselman prospects generated by this technology. The Company owns two Geoquest work stations, which are being utilized to interpret and map its 3-D data.the area with subsurface geology. Sean Andrew Field. The Company's most significant West Texas producing properties are located in Sean Andrew Field, Dawson County,was discovered by the Company in 1994 utilizing the Company's 375 square mile 3-D seismic database in West Texas. The Company's average net daily production at Sean AndrewCompany is the operator in the field and holds an approximate 37.5% working interest in the field. Marholl Field. The Marholl Field was 262 Bbls of oil and 110 Mcf of natural gas during 1996. The Sean Andrewis a Siluro-Devonian (Fussellman) Field has produced in excess of 723,767 barrels of oil and .26 Bcf of gas gross to the interest owners. Other. In addition to the Sean Andrew interests, the Company maintains ownership interests in acreage and wells in several additional fields including the (i) Ackerly Field, located in Howard County, Texas, (ii) Lamesa Farms Field, located in Dawson County Texas, (iii) Carthage (Bethany) Field, locateddiscovered in Panola County, Texas, (iv) Marhol Field, located1995 through the use of 3-D seismic. The Company operates two wells in Dawson County, Texas and Midway Field located in San Patricio County, Texas. As a result of the La/Cal II Acquisition, the Company has added two additional Texas fields to its properties.field with an approximate 23% working interest. Mary Blevins Field. The Mary Blevins Field is located in Smith County, Texas and iswas a new discovery which is fault separated from Hitts Lake Field which was discovered in 1953 by Sun Oil. Currently there are threefour producing wells in this fault block with Goodrich, as operator, having approximately a 48% working interest in approximately 782 gross acres. To date, Hitts Lake has produced over 14 million barrels of oil and Mary Blevins has produced over 183,000414,000 barrels from the Paluxy, which occurs at a depth of approximately 7,300 feet. Goodrich plans to drill twoOther. The Company maintains ownership interests in acreage and wells in several additional wells duringfields in Texas including the second quarter of 1997.(i) Ackerly Field, located in Dawson and Howard Counties, (ii) Lamesa Farms Field, located in Dawson County, (iii) Carthage (Bethany) Field, located in Panola County, (iv) N.W. Ackerly Field, located in Dawson County, (v) Midway Field located in San Patricio County, (vi) East Jacksonville Field. The Jacksonville Field is located in Cherokee County, Texas(vii) Mott Slough, located in Wharton County, (viii) Falls City Field, located in Karnes County and was(ix) Mikeska-Hamill Field, located in Austin County. Australia Goodrich has interest in three exploration permits in the Carnarvon Basin of Western Australia. The developmental stage of the offshore Carnarvon Basin of Western Australia is comparable to the Gulf of Mexico in 1950. The Carnarvon Basin is two-thirds the size of the Gulf of Mexico and has produced in excess 4 of 4.3 TCF and 550 million barrels of oil from less than 1000 wells. In comparison, the Gulf of Mexico has produced approximately 104 TCF of gas and 9 billion barrels of oil from 30,000 wells. The Carnarvon Basin retains significant exploration potential. Additional strengths of the basin include large inexpensive acreage blocks, vast available geological and geophysical data sets, existing and expanding petroleum infrastructure and increasing domestic demands for natural gas. EP-395. Goodrich Petroleum acquired a new discovery by Goodrich Oil Company in 1994. Currently there is one producing well with Goodrich as operator having an approximate 44%20% non-operated working interest in the 240 square kilometer Exploration Permit in 1995. The Permit is approximately 753 acres. To date, the well30 km east from Barrow Island Field which has produced over 53,000300 million barrels of oil and Goodrich intends to drill85 km southwest and on trend with the recent Wandoo, Stag and Reindeer discoveries. Since 1995, the partners have reprocessed the original 2-D seismic data sets, shot a 38 km 3-D seismic survey (1995), and shot an additional 93 km of high quality 2-D seismic (1997). Interpretation of this data has confirmed two separate prospects: Lindsay and West Boyd. These prospects are structural closures with associated seismic amplitude anomalies. The primary objective for these prospects is the Mardie Greenstone. This objective is a late cretaceous age, shallow marine sandstone with porosities ranging up to 33%. A well duringis anticipated to be drilled on the second quarterLindsay prospect in late 1999. Carnarvon Petroleum N.L. is the operator of 1997. 5 this permit. EP-396. The Company acquired a 33% non-operated working interest in 1995. EP-396 encompasses 400 square kilometers and is in close proximity to EP-395. The partnership has reprocessed and interpreted the available 2-D seismic data sets. One strong lead has emerged from the seismic data, which is a prospect called the Nolan Prospect. This prospect is a downthrown three way closure along the major down to the west Candace fault system. The available 2-D seismic data set indicates an associated seismic amplitude anomaly. TAP Oil N.L. is the operator of EP-396. EP-397. This Permit is 160 square kilometers and the Company has a 33% working interest. The 130 km of available seismic has been reprocessed and interpreted with several promising prospect leads. This Permit is in the earliest stages of exploratory investigation as compared with EP-395 and EP-396. Oil and Natural Gas Reserves The following tables set forth summary information with respect to the Company's proved reserves as of January 1,December 31, 1998 and 1997 on a historical basis and on a pro forma basis as if the La/Cal II Acquisition had been completed as of that date, as estimated by the Company by compiling the reserve information, substantially all of which was prepared by twothe engineering firms (primarilyfirm of Coutret and Associates, Inc.) and the Company internally. Historical
NET RESERVES PRESENT VALUE ----------------------- OF FUTURE NET OIL GAS REVENUES CATEGORY (MBBLS) (BCF) BCFE (1) (IN MILLIONS)December 31, 1998 -------------------------------------------- Net Reserves Pre-Tax Present ---------------------------- Value of Future Oil Net Revenues Category (Bbls) Gas (Mcf) Bcfe(1) (in millions) -------- --------- ---------- ------- ----- -------- ---------------------------- Proved Developed Producing (Pre-tax)..... 798.33 8.90 13.69 $37.68Developed............. 2,266,854 21,481,946 35.1 $31.99 Proved Developed Non-Producing (Pre-tax). 171.54 5.01 6.04 10.28 Proved Undeveloped (Pre-tax)............. 80.34 4.27 4.76 9.40 -------- ----- -----Undeveloped........... 825,956 6,662,364 11.6 8.64 --------- ---------- ---- ------ Total Proved (Pre-tax)................. 1,050.21 18.18 24.49 $57.36 ======== ===== =====Proved............... 3,092,810 28,144,310 46.7 $40.63 ========= ========== ==== ====== Standardized measure December 31, 1997 -------------------------------------------- Net Reserves Pre-Tax Present ---------------------------- Value of discounted future net cash flows.......................... $47.36 ====== Pro Forma NET RESERVES PRESENT VALUE ----------------------- OF FUTURE NET OIL GAS REVENUES CATEGORY (MBBLS) (BCF) BCFE (1) (IN MILLIONS)Future Oil Net Revenues Category (Bbls) Gas (Mcf) Bcfe(1) (in millions) -------- --------- ---------- ------- ----- -------- ---------------------------- Proved Developed Producing (Pre-tax)..... 1,845.89 12.06 23.13 $57.86Developed............. 2,292,626 16,600,669 30.4 $41.86 Proved Developed Non-Producing (Pre-tax). 312.72 4.73 6.61 11.13 Proved Undeveloped (Pre-tax)............. 493.50 4.71 7.67 14.18 -------- ----- -----Undeveloped........... 1,805,764 20,969,945 31.8 36.24 --------- ---------- ---- ------ Total Proved (Pre-tax)................. 2,652.11 21.50 37.41 $83.17 ======== ===== ===== ====== Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.......................... $68.26Proved............... 4,098,390 37,570,614 62.2 $78.10 ========= ========== ==== ======
- - -------- (1) Estimated by the Company using a conversion ratio of 1.0 Bbl/6.0 Mcf. 5 There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond the control of the Company. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil, condensate and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. The quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered, production and operating costs, the amount and timing of future development expenditures and future oil and natural gas sales prices may all differ from those assumed in these estimates. Therefore, the Present Value of Future Net Revenues amounts shown above should not be construed as the current market value of the estimated oil and natural gas reserves attributable to the Company's properties. In accordance with the Commission's guidelines, the engineers' estimates of future net revenues from the Company's properties and the Present Value of Future Net Revenues thereof are made using oil and natural gas sales prices in effect as of the dates of such estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties except where such guidelines permit alternate treatment, including the use of fixed and determinable contractual price escalations. The weighted average prices as of December 31, 19961998 used in such estimates were $4.17$2.24 per Mcf of natural gas (historical) and $23.88$9.37 per Bbl of crude oil/condensate (historical) and $4.07 per Mcf of natural gas (pro forma) and $23.53 per Bbl (pro forma).condensate. Oil andprices have subsequently increased while gas prices have subsequently declined from December 31, 19961998 levels. 6 Productive Wells The following tables set forth the number of active well bores in which the Company maintains ownership interests as of December 31, 1996, on a historical basis and on a pro forma basis as if the La/Cal II Acquisition had been completed as of that date:1998:
NET GROSS (1) (2) HistoricalOil Gas Total --------------- --------------- --------------- Gross(1) Net(2) Gross(1) Net(2) Gross(1) Net(2) -------- ----------- -------- ------ -------- ------ Louisiana--Pecan Lake..................................... California.............. -- -- 4.00 1.81 Louisiana--Lake Raccourci.................................2.09 4.00 2.09 Colorado................ -- -- 1.00 .16 Louisiana--South Pecan Lake................................30 1.00 .40 Louisiana--Ada.............................................30 Louisiana............... 12.00 5.02 30.00 11.19 42.00 16.21 Michigan................ 2.00 .26 5.00 .05 7.00 .31 Mississippi............. -- -- 1.00 .40 Texas--Sean Andrew........................................ 7.00 2.52 Other..................................................... 49.00 12.62.05 1.00 .05 New Mexico.............. -- -- 1.00 .03 1.00 .03 Texas................... 28.00 11.82 5.00 .75 33.00 12.57 Wyoming................. 2.00 .32 -- -- 2.00 .32 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Total Productive Wells................................ 63.00 17.91Wells................ 44.00 17.42 47.00 14.46 91.00 31.88 ===== ===== NET GROSS (1) (2) Pro Forma -------- ----- Louisiana--Pecan Lake..................................... 4.00 1.81 Louisiana--Lake Raccourci................................. 1.00 .16 Louisiana--South Pecan Lake............................... 1.00 .40 Louisiana--Ada............................................ 1.00 .40 Louisiana--Second Bayou................................... 5.00 1.55 Louisiana--Kings Ridge.................................... 1.00 .41 Louisiana--Deep Lake...................................... 1.00 .44 Louisiana--Mosquito Bay................................... 1.00 .46 Louisiana--Opelousas/Northcott............................ 1.00 .53 Texas--Sean Andrew........................................ 7.00 2.52 Texas--Mary Blevins....................................... 3.00 1.56 Texas--East Jacksonville.................................. 1.00 .47 Other..................................................... 49.00 12.62 ----- ----- Total Productive Wells................................ 76.00 23.33===== ===== ===== =====
- - -------- (1) Does not include royalty or overriding royalty interests. (2) Net working interest. Productive wells consist of producing wells and wells capable of production, including gas wells awaiting pipeline connections. A gross well is a well in which the Company maintains an ownership interest, while a net well is deemed to exist when the sum of the fractional working interests owned by the Company equals one. 7Wells that are completed in more than one producing horizon are counted as one well. Of the gross wells reported above, eight had multiple completions. 6 Acreage The following table summarizes the Company's gross and net developed and undeveloped natural gas and oil acreage under lease as of December 31, 1996 on a historical basis and on a pro forma basis as if the La/Cal II Acquisition had been completed as of that date.1998. Acreage in which the Company's interest is limited to a royalty or overriding royalty interest is excluded from the table.
GROSS NET Historical --------- --------Gross Net ------- ------ Developed acreage Louisiana--Pecan Lake Field.......................... 870.63 400.10 Louisiana--Lake Raccourci Field...................... 900.00 144.00 Louisiana--South Pecan Lake Field.................... 160.00 64.17 Louisiana--Ada Field................................. 160.00 64.00 Texas--Sean Andrew Field............................. 280.00 101.00 Other................................................ 11,388.52 1,332.93California............................................... 1,280 568 Colorado................................................. 640 192 Louisiana................................................ 7,907 2,644 Michigan................................................. 1,920 19 Texas.................................................... 5,598 2,005 Wyoming.................................................. 80 13 Undeveloped acreage Louisiana--Lake Raccourci Field...................... 3,220.00 673.00 Louisiana--South Pecan Lake.......................... 224.00 89.84 Other Undeveloped.................................... 2,943.04 1,236.02 --------- -------- Total.............................................. 20,146.19 4,105.06 ========= ======== GROSS NET Pro Forma --------- -------- Developed acreage Louisiana--Pecan Lake Field.......................... 870.63 400.10 Louisiana--Lake Raccourci Field...................... 900.00 144.00 Louisiana--South Pecan Lake Field.................... 160.00 64.17 Louisiana--Ada Field................................. 160.00 64.00 Louisiana--Second Bayou.............................. 1,394.69 435.35 Louisiana--Kings Ridge............................... 435.02 176.80 Louisiana--Deep Lake................................. 725.18 320.81 Louisiana--Mosquito Bay.............................. 227.29 105.76 Louisiana--Opelousas/Northcott....................... 1,022.86 537.87 Texas--Sean Andrew Field............................. 280.00 101.00 Texas--Mary Blevins.................................. 781.68 407.27 Texas--East Jacksonville............................. 753.15 361.11 Other................................................ 11,388.52 1,332.93 Undeveloped acreage.................................... Louisiana--Lake Raccourci Field...................... 3,220.00 673.00 Louisiana--South Pecan Lake.......................... 224.00 89.84 Other Undeveloped.................................... 2,943.04 1,236.02 --------- -------- Total.............................................. 25,486.06 6,450.03 ========= ========Offshore Australia....................................... 197,682 57,985 Louisiana................................................ 1,795 1,524 Michigan................................................. 640 154 Texas.................................................... 2,400 1,257 ------- ------ Total.................................................. 219,942 66,361 ======= ======
Undeveloped acreage is considered to be those lease acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas andor oil, regardless of whether or not such acreage contains proved reserves. As is customary in the oil and gas industry, the Company can retain its interest in undeveloped acreage by drilling activity that establishes commercial production sufficient to maintain the leases or by payment of delay rentals during the remaining primary term of such a lease. The natural gas and oil leases in which the Company has an interest are for varying primary terms; however, most of the Company's developed lease acreage is beyond the primary term and is held by producing natural gas and/or oil wells. The Company participated in several farmout agreements with other owners of natural gas and oil leases and is actively leasing acreage in Louisiana and Texas. 8 Operator Activities Goodrich Petroleum is the operator of record of substantially all of its wells in the Lake Raccourci, South Pecan Lake, Pecan Lake, Ada and Sean Andrew Fields. Goodrich Petroleum operates a majority in value of the Company's producing properties, and will generally seek to become the operator of record concerningon properties it drills or acquires in the future. Goodrich is the operator of all of the wells acquired in the La/Cal II Acquisition.7 Drilling Activities The following table sets forth the drilling activity of the Company since 1992. This information reflects La/Cal's operations on a stand alone basis prior to August 15, 1995.for the last three years. (As denoted in the following table, "Gross" wells refers to wells in which a working interest is owned, while a "net" well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross wells equals one.)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31 ----------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994---------- --------- --------- --------- GROSS NET GROSS NET GROSS NETGross Net Gross Net Gross Net ----- ------- ----- --- ----- --- DevelopmentDevelpment Wells: Productive......................................Productive............................... 6.00 2.77 6.0 2.6 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 Non-Productive..................................Non-Productive........................... 2.00 1.47 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ----- ---- ---- --- ---- --- Total.................................. 8.00 4.24 6.0 2.6 1.0 0.4 ---- --- --- --- --- --- Total......................................... 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 2.0 0.9===== ==== ==== === === === ======= === Exploratory Wells: Productive......................................Productive............................... 7.00 1.49 12.0 2.9 6.0 2.5 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Non-Productive..................................Non-Productive........................... 8.00 2.87 7.0 1.7 3.0 1.3 2.0 0.7 0.0 0.0----- ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- --- --- Total.........................................Total.................................. 15.00 4.36 19.0 4.6 9.0 3.8 3.0 0.9 0.0 0.0===== ==== ==== === === === ======= === Total Wells: Productive......................................Productive............................... 13.00 4.26 18.0 5.5 7.0 2.9 2.0 0.6 1.0 0.5 Non-Productive..................................Non-Productive........................... 9.00 4.34 7.0 1.7 3.0 1.3 2.0 0.7 1.0 0.4----- ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- --- --- Total.........................................Total.................................. 23.00 8.60 25.0 7.2 10.0 4.2 4.0 1.3 2.0 0.9===== ==== ==== === === === ======= ===
During 1994 and up to the business combination August 15, 1995, La/Cal was engaged in limited developmental drilling in the Pecan Lake and Lake Charles Fields and La/Cal did not drill any exploratory wells during those periods. 9 Net Production, Unit Prices and Costs The following table presents certain information with respect to oil, gas and condensate production attributable to the Company's interests in all of its fields, the revenue derived from the sale of such production, average sales prices received and average production costs during each of the years in the five-yearthree-year period ended December 31, 1996 and on a pro forma basis as if the La/Cal II Acquisition had taken place on January 1, 1996.1998.
PRO FORMA1998 1997 1996 1996 1995 1994 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net Production: Natural Gasgas (Mcf).................... 2,390,476....................... 2,782,825 2,449,320 1,623,377 2,213,923 2,386,130 Oil.................................. 285,757Oil (barrels)........................... 316,768 282,380 165,964 102,731 36,487 Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe) (1)... 4,105,018...... 4,683,433 4,143,600 2,619,161 2,830,309 2,605,052 Average Net Daily Production: Natural gas (Mcf).................... 6,549....................... 7,624 6,710 4,448 6,065 6,537 Oil (Bbls)........................... 783.............................. 868 774 455 281 100 Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)....... 11,247 (1)...... 12,832 11,354 7,176 7,754 7,137 Average Sales Price Per Unit: Natural Gasgas (per Mcf)................................... $ 2.18 2.55 2.60 2.60 1.72 1.85 Oil (per Bbl)........................ 20.79........................... 11.88 18.06 20.88 16.27 15.99 Other Data: Lease operating expense and production taxes (per Mcfe).......................... $ .39 .46 .22 .15 Oil and gas depreciation, depletion and amortization (per Mcfe).......................... 1.05 1.02 .48 .40.60 .56 .62
- - -------- (1) Estimated by the Company using a conversion ratio of 1.0 Bbl/6.0 Mcf. 8 Oil and Gas Marketing and Major Customers Marketing. Goodrich's natural gas production is sold under spot or market- sensitive contracts and to various gas purchasers on short-term contracts. Goodrich's natural gas condensate is sold under short-term rollover agreements based on current market prices. The Company's crude oil production is marketed to several purchasers based on short-term contracts. The Company entered into an agreement with Natural Gas Ventures, L.L.C. ("NGV"), a Louisiana limited liability company, that affiliates of Goodrich Oil Company formed in August 1994, to operate as an agent for the purpose of marketing Goodrich Oilthe Company's and its contracting parties' natural gas. The Company and other contracting parties contribute natural gas to NGV, which NGV then markets to gas purchasers, pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement between NGV and Seaber (described below)Corporation of Louisiana ("Seaber"). The Company can terminate this agreement on 60-days advance notice. The Company and the other contracting parties are entitled to participate, on a pro rata basis, in any net profits or equity benefits received by NGV under its Joint Venture Agreement with Seaber, provided the Company and the other contracting parties have not terminated the agreement and are delivering gas under the agreement at the time the net profits and equity interest are earned. The Company believes its contract with NGV allows it to realize higher prices for its contributed gas because of the greater market power associated with larger volumes of gas than the Company would have for sale on a stand-alone basis. NGV has entered into a natural gas marketing joint venture agreement (the "Joint Venture Agreement") with Seaber whereby Seaber acts as agent for NGV in its gas marketing efforts. Pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, Seaber arranges short-term gas sales contracts on behalf of NGV with gas purchasers, and NGV delivers to Seaber sufficient gas quantities to fulfill NGV's contractual obligations. NGV can terminate the Joint Venture Agreement on a 60-days advance notice. During the term of the Joint Venture Agreement, on a calendar year basis, NGV has the option to share in 50 percent of all Seaber's net profits provided that NGV meets certain scheduled delivery requirements. Each year, 25% of NGV's share of the Seaber net profits is retained by Seaber as an account payable, which Seaber uses as additional working capital. At the end of the term of the Joint Venture Agreement, and subject to delivering scheduled volumes of gas, NGV can elect to convert its cumulative accounts payable into 50% of the outstanding Seaber common stock, or can choose to receive the payable in cash. 10 As set forth above, provided certain conditions are met, NGV will distribute the Seaber net profits and equity interests if any, to its contracting parties on a pro rata basis. Sean Andrew Field. Goodrich's oil production is gathered by pipeline and purchased by Mobil at a premium over the posted price. The gas is purchased by GPM on a thirty day spot basis. Natural Gas. Goodrich's natural gas production is sold under spot or market- sensitive contracts and to various gas purchasers on short-term contracts. Goodrich's natural gas condensate is sold under short-term rollover agreements based on current market prices. Customers. Due to the nature of the industry the Company sells its oil and natural gas production to a limited number of purchasers and, accordingly, amounts receivable from such purchasers could be significant. Additionally, the Company receives net monthly payments from its partner, Mitchell Marketing Company, in its pipeline joint venture. Revenues from these sources as a percent of total revenues for the periods presented were as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, ---------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 ---- ---- ---- Tenneco Gas Marketing Company.............................. -- -- 41% Seaber Corporation of Louisiana............................ 47% 44% 35% 55% 48%Texaco..................................................... 12% 11% -- Navajo Refining Company.................................... 11% -- -- Mobil Oil Corporation...................................... -- 10% 22% 16% -- Mitchell Marketing Company................................. 16%-- 9% --16%
Sales The year ended December 31, 1996 generated cash proceeds of $325,628 fromDuring 1998, the sale ofCompany sold its interest in certain oil and gas properties located in Texas for $49,000. During 1997, the Company sold its interests in certain oil and gas properties located primarily in Montana for $370,000. During 1996, the Company sold its interests in certain oil and gas properties located substantially all in North Dakota. Natural Gas Pipeline Joint Venture Pecos Pipeline & Producing Company ("Pecos"), one of the Company's subsidiaries, has a 20% interest in a joint venture with Ferguson Crossing Pipeline Company, now Southwestern Gas Gathering, Inc. ("Southwestern") a subsidiary of Mitchell Energy and Development Company, relating to an intrastate pipeline. Pecos and its related facilities are located in Leon and Madison Counties, Texas. The pipeline and related facilities are referred to as the "Pecos Pipeline Systems". Southwestern acts as the manager of the joint venture and the net proceeds are distributed to the venturers on a monthly basis, subject to the retention of one month of working capital. In September 1993, the same parties created another joint ventureDakota for the purpose of separating the gas contract from the physical pipeline. The joint venture participants are National Marketing Company, which is a subsidiary of the Company, and Mitchell Marketing Company. This joint venture is known as "Madison Gas Marketing Services" ("Madison Gas"). The joint ventures were established for the purposes of buying and/or transporting gas from producers and other pipelines under various contracts at various receipt points and delivering or reselling the gas to Lone Star Gas Company ("Lone Star") under the terms and conditions of a premium priced/fixed volume 20-year contract dated October 1, 1981. On August 31, 1994, effective November 1, 1994, Madison Gas entered into a settlement agreement for the remaining term of the contract providing for (i) a total fixed contract quantity of 23,826,560 Mmbtu, (ii) a monthly average daily contract quantity not to exceed 18,000 Mmbtu during the months of November through March, (iii) a monthly average daily contact quantity not to exceed 7,000 Mmbtu during the months of April through October, (iv) an average annual gross profit margin of $1.74 per Mmbtu less operating expenses and (v) six additional delivery points. The Lone Star contract terminates at some time in the year 2000 depending upon the monthly average daily contract quantities taken under the settlement agreement. 11 $326,000. Investment in Marcum Natural Gas Services TheOn January 5, 1999 the Company presently owns 675,200 shares of the common stock of Marcum Naturalsold its investment in National Gas Services ("Marcum"), or approximately 5.5% of the Marcum common stock outstanding. for $240,000. Marcum is a publicly held diversified provider of products and services to the natural gas industry. Competition The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. Major and independent oil and gas companies, drilling and production acquisition programs and individual producers and operators are active bidders for desirable oil and gas properties, as well as the equipment and labor required to operate those properties. Many competitors have financial resources substantially greater than those of the Company, has, and staffs and facilities substantially larger than those of the Company. The availability of a ready market for the oil and gas production of the Company will depend in part on the cost and availability of alternative fuels, the level of consumer demand, the extent of other domestic production of oil and gas, the extent of importation of foreign oil and gas, the cost of and proximity to pipelines and other transportation facilities, regulations by state and federal authorities and the cost of complying with applicable environmental regulations. 9 Regulations The availability of a ready market for any natural gas and oil production depends upon numerous factors beyond the Company's control. These factors include regulation of natural gas and oil production, federal and state regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control, state limits on allowable rates of production by a well or proration unit, the amount of natural gas and oil available for sale, the availability of adequate pipeline and other transportation and processing facilities and the marketing of competitive fuels. For example, a productive natural gas well may be "shut-in""shut- in" because of an oversupply of natural gas or the lack of an available natural gas pipeline in the areas in which the Company may conduct operations. State and federal regulations generally are intended to prevent waste of natural gas and oil, protect rights to produce natural gas and oil between owners in a common reservoir, control the amount of natural gas and oil produced by assigning allowable rates of production and control contamination of the environment. Pipelines are subject to the jurisdiction of various federal, state and local agencies as well. Federal Regulation of Natural Gas The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") regulates the transportation and resale of natural gas in interstate commerce pursuant to the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (the "NGA"). Since 1978, the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (the "NGPA") has regulated maximum selling prices of certain categories of gas in either interstate or intrastate commerce. FERC also administers the NGPA. Under the Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989, however, most regulation and control of natural gas have been eliminated. None of the remaining areas of regulation under the NGA and NGPA have a direct effect on the Company's operations. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company's production of natural gas will not be subject to federal regulation in the future. In April 1992, subsequently as amended, FERC issued Order 636, a rule which restructures the interstate natural gas transportation and marketing system to ensure that direct sales of gas by producers or marketers receive pipeline service comparable to pipeline gas sales. FERC Order 636 is intended to provide "open access" to producers for transportation of gas on ten interstate pipeline systems. Environmental Regulation Various federal, state and local laws and regulations covering the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, may affect the Company's operations and costs as a result of their effect on oil and gas development, exploration and production operations. It is not 12 anticipated that the Company will be required in the near future to expend amounts that are material in relation to its total capital expenditures program by reason of environmental laws and regulations but, inasmuch as such laws and regulations are frequently changed by both federal and state agencies, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate cost of continued compliance. Additionally, see existing EPA matters discussed in Item 3--Legal Proceedings. State Regulation of Oil and Gas Production State statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. In addition, there are state statutes, rules and regulations governing conservation matters, including the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells and the spacing, plugging and abandonment of such wells. Such statutes and regulations may limit the rate at which oil and gas could otherwise be produced from the Company's properties and may restrict the number of wells that may be drilled on a particular lease or in a particular field. (There are currently discussions in several states relating to the imposition of limitations on annual natural gas production rates.) ITEMItem 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.Legal Proceedings. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has identified the Company as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") for the cost of clean-up of "hazardous substances" at an oil field waste disposal site in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. The Company estimates that the remaining cost of long-term clean-up of the site will be approximately $3.5 million, with the Company's percentage of responsibility to be approximately 3.05%. As of December 31, 1996,1998, the Company has paid approximately $135,000$321,000 in costs related to this matter and has $275,000$92,000 accrued for the remaining liability. These costs have not been discounted to their present value. The EPA and the PRPs will continue to evaluate the site and revise estimates for the long-term clean-up of the site. There can be no assurance that the cost of clean-up and the Company's percentage responsibility will not be higher than currently estimated. In addition, under the federal environmental laws, the liability costs for the clean-up of the site is joint and several among all PRPs. Therefore, the ultimate cost of the clean-up to the Company could be significantly higher than the amount presently estimated or accrued for this liability. The Company is party to additional lawsuits arising out ofin the normal course of business. However, theThe Company has defended and intends to continue to defend these actions vigorously and believes, based on currently available information, that adverse results or judgments from such actions, if any, in excess of insurance coverage or amounts already provided, will not be material to theits financial position or results of operationsoperations. Item 4. Submission of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. None. 1310 PART II ITEMItem 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. The Company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. At March 3, 1997,26, 1999 the number of holders of record of the Company's common stock without determination of the number of individual participants in security position was 3,7023,492 with 41,804,5105,247,705 shares outstanding. High and low sales prices for the Company's common stock for each quarter during the calendar years 19961998 and 19951997 are as follows:
1996 1995 ------------ ------------ QUARTER ENDED HIGH LOW HIGH LOW1998 1997 ---------- --------- Quarter Ended High Low High Low ------------- ------ ----- ------ --------- ---- ---- March 31........................................ $1.125 $.75 N/A N/A31............................................. $8.00 5.06 9.00 6.00 June 30.............................................. $7.19 5.25 9.00 6.00 September 30......................................... 1.125 .75 N/A N/A September 30.................................... .815 .625 $1.375 $.938$5.63 2.25 6.50 5.00 December 31..................................... .813 .563 1.25 .7531.......................................... $3.00 1.13 6.50 4.50
Prices from periods priorThe prices in the table above have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the business combination (August 15, 1995) are not applicable due to La/Cal being a privately held partnership.Company's one-for-eight reverse stock split in March 1998. The Company has not paid a cash dividend on its Common Stock and does not intend to pay such a dividend in the foreseeable future. 1411 ITEMItem 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.Selected Financial Data. Selected Statement of Operations Data: The following table sets forth selected financial data of the Company for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 1998, which information has been derived from the Company's audited financial statements. This information should be read in connection with and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information in the Company's financial statements under Item 8 below and Item 7, "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS."
PERIOD FROM HISTORICAL JULY 15, 1993 PERIOD FROM ---------------------------------- (INCEPTION) JANUARY 1, 1993 PRO FORMA YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, THROUGH THROUGH YEAR ENDED ----------- ---------------------------------- DECEMBER 31, JULY 14, DECEMBER 31, 1996(E)----------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1993(C) 1992(C) ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- --------------- ---------------------- Revenues................ $14,370,000 9,857,811$10,591,873 12,901,361 9,769,383 6,174,412 5,013,446 1,068,404 947,000 896,000 Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization....... 5,420,0004,094,447 4,862,754 3,788,292 1,785,502 1,156,624 179,476 Exploration............. 1,149,0006,010,425 3,205,730 1,149,240 193,159 4,240 -- Interest Expense........ 1,593,0001,909,849 1,416,675 828,394 1,132,488 1,072,098 199,389 Total Costs and Expenses............... 12,655,00018,311,421 14,978,629 9,476,366 5,037,101 2,998,628 574,220 137,000 173,000Gain on sale of assets.. 4,206 688,304 88,428 -- -- Extraordinary Item-- Early Extinguishment of Debt.................. -- -- -- 482,906 -- -- Net Income.............. 1,715,000Income (Loss)....... (7,715,342) (1,388,964) 381,445 654,405 2,014,818 494,184 Preferred Stock Dividends.............. 1,264,0001,255,638 1,205,210 644,800 254,932 Earnings (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock.................. 451,000(8,970,980) (2,594,174) (263,355) 399,473 Earnings (Loss)Basic Loss Per Average Common Share...Share(c)........ (1.71) (.50) (.05) Diluted Loss Per Average Common Share(c)........ $ .01 (.01)(1.71) (.50) (.05) Average Common Shares Outstanding............ 41,804,510 41,804,510Outstanding(c)......... 5,243,105 5,229,307 5,225,564 Pro Forma Information: Pro Forma Income Taxes(a).............. 402,698 785,779 192,732 Pro Forma Net Income... 251,707 1,229,039 301,452 Pro FormaForm Earnings (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock.......... (3,225) 1,229,039 301,452 Pro Forma Income Before Extraordinary Item Per Average Common Share... .02 .06 .02Share(c)............... .14 .50 Extraordinary Item Per Average Common Share... (.02) --Share(c)............... (.14) -- Pro Forma Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Average Common Share...........Share(c)............... -- .06 .02.50 Pro Forma Average Common Shares Outstanding (b). 27,722,543 19,765,226 19,765,226
Selected Balance Sheet Data: Outstanding(b)(c)...... 3,465,318 2,470,653
PRO FORMA HISTORICAL ----------- ------------------------------------------- DECEMBERDecember 31, ------------------------------------------------------- 1996(E)----------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- Selected Balance Sheet Data: Total Assets............ $39,496,000Assets........... $44,036,588 37,537,918 22,398,984 22,382,716 8,230,496 5,371,000Total Long Term Debt.......... 19,000,000Debt(e)............... 29,500,000 18,500,000 10,000,000 9,750,000 8,250,000 4,700,000 Stockholders' Equity (Partners' Deficit).... $16,635,000... $ 4,959,388 14,332,676 9,135,200 9,662,812 (2,081,217) (989,000)
- -------- -------- (a) No provision for income taxes is included in the consolidated statements of operations for the periods ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 or the period from January 1, 1995 through August 14, 1995, for the operations of La/Cal Energy Partners (predecessor company), due to La/Cal Energy Partners being a partnership and income taxes were the responsibility of the individual partners of La/Cal Energy Partners. Certain unaudited pro forma information relating to the Company's results of operations, had La/Cal Energy Partners been a corporation for those periods, is shown above. (b) For purposes of this presentation the number of pro forma shares used for periods prior to August 15, 1995, is 19,765,2262,470,653 shares (adjusted retroactively for the March 1998 reverse stock split), which is the number of shares issued by the Company in exchange for La/Cal Energy Partners net assets contributed. (c) La/Cal Energy Partners was organized on July 15, 1993. StatementNumber of operations data, other financial data, and other selected operating data, other than revenues from oil and gas sales and lease operating expenses and production taxes,shares restated to retroactively adjust for the period from January 1, 1993 through July 15, 1993 andone for the year ended December 31, 1992, as well as balance sheet data as of December 31, 1992, is not presented, as the properties for which such financial data related were not maintained as a separate business unit, and assets, liabilities or indirect operating costs applicable to the properties were not segregated by the owners prior to the formation of La/Cal Energy Partners.eight reverse stock split in March 1998. (d) The above data reflects the operations solely of La/Cal Energy Partners for periods prior to August 15, 1995,15,1995, whereas such data reflects the operations of La/Cal Energy Partners combined with Patrick Petroleum Company for periods subsequent to August 15, 1995. (e) Amounts are shown on a pro forma basis as if the La/Cal Acquisition had taken place on January 1, 1996, for statementIncludes current maturities. 12 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of operations data,Financial Condition and on December 31, 1996, for balance sheet data. 15 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Background of Business Combination and Basis of Presentation The Company was created by the combination of Patrick Petroleum Company ("Patrick") and La/Cal Energy Partners ("La/Cal") in August 1995. The combination of Patrick and La/Cal was effected primarily by two concurrent transactions: (a) the contribution by La/Cal of substantially all of its assets and liabilities to the Company in exchange for 19,765,226 shares of Common Stock and (b) the merger Patrick and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (the "Merger") whereby (i) each of the 19,765,226 outstanding shares of Patrick common stock ("Patrick Common Stock") was converted into one share of Common Stock; (ii) each outstanding share of Patrick Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was converted into one share of the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and (iii) Patrick, the surviving corporation in the Merger, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The La/Cal--Patrick business combination was accounted for on the basis of purchase accounting, with La/Cal deemed to be the acquiror. Accordingly, on August 15, 1995, the Company recorded the assets and liabilities of Patrick at fair value, whereas the assets and liabilities of La/Cal are reflected at historical book value. The consolidated financial statements reflect the operations solely of La/Cal for periods prior to August 15, 1995, whereas such financial statements reflect the operations of the combined entities for periods subsequent to August 15, 1995. As a result, comparison of the current and prior period financial statements presented is significantly impacted by the combination transactions and, accordingly, will not be indicative of future operating results. Prior to the combination transactions, La/Cal was a privately owned Louisiana general partnership which was formed on July 15, 1993, by the contribution of certain oil and gas properties owned by the partners. As more fully discussed in "1997 Acquisition," the Company acquired the oil and gas properties of La/Cal Energy Partners II and certain working interest owners on January 31, 1997. Results of Operations As noted above, the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 1994 and the period from July 15, 1993 through December 31, 1993, reflect the operations of La/Cal only, whereas the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1995, reflects the operations solely of La/Cal prior to the combination date (August 15, 1995) and the operations of the combined entities subsequent to the combination date. Year ended December 31, 1996 versus year ended December 31, 1995--Total revenues in 1996 increased to $9,858,000 and were $3,684,000 (60%) higher than total revenues in 1995 due to a full year of the combined entities which resulted in higher oil and gas sales. Oil and gas sales were $2,211,000 higher due primarily to increased oil production as a result of the inclusion of revenues of the combined entities in 1996 along with increased oil prices for the year. Gas production for 1996 was lower primarily due to the early abandonment of two wells producing from a gas reservoir in the Lake Charles Field and a third well producing at a reduced rate compared to 1995. One of the abandoned wells has recently been completed in an oil reservoir. The dollar impact of this decrease was more than offset by increased gas prices received in 1996. In addition, 1996 contains a full year of revenues from the pipeline joint venture which contributed $1,538,000 compared to $573,000 for 1995. The following table reflects the production volumes and pricing information for the periods presented:
1996 1995 ------------------------ ------------------------ PRODUCTION AVERAGE PRICE PRODUCTION AVERAGE PRICE ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- Gas (Mcf)............... 1,623,377 $ 2.60 2,213,923 $ 1.72 Oil (Bbls).............. 165,964 $20.88 102,731 $16.27
Lease operating expense and production taxes were $1,615,000 for 1996 compared to $1,030,000 for 1995 or $585,000 higher due to the addition of the Patrick oil and gas properties. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe 16 were $.46 in 1996 compared to $.22 in 1995 due to the high level of such expenses of the Patrick properties versus the La/Cal properties. Depletion, depreciation and amortization was $3,788,000 versus $1,786,000 due to a full year of the combined entities, including amortization of the pipeline joint venture. Oil and gas depletion and depreciation per Mcfe was $1.02 in 1996 versus $.48 in 1995, the increase due to the Patrick properties carrying a significantly higher rate per Mcfe. The Company incurred $1,149,000 of exploration expense in 1996 compared to $193,000 in 1995 due to a full year of the combined entities in 1996 versus four and one-half months in 1995. Included in the 1996 exploration expense is $542,000 of costs related to dry holes during the period versus $40,000 of such costs in 1995. General and administrative expenses amounted to $2,096,000 for 1996 versus $739,000 due to the Company providing its own general and administrative services for the full year in 1996 versus four and one-half months in 1995. Additionally, as a public company, the Company incurs a higher level of general and administrative expenses than a privately held company. Interest expense was $828,000 in 1996 compared to $1,132,000 (27% lower) due to the Company having lower average debt outstanding and a lower effective interest rate in 1996 compared to 1995. The Company's preferred stock dividends amounted to $645,000 for 1996 (twelve months dividends on average of 806,000 shares outstanding) compared to $255,000 (four and one-half months dividends on average of 849,000 shares outstanding). Year ended December 31, 1995 versus year ended December 31, 1994--Revenues in 1995 amounted to $6,174,000 and were $1,161,000 (23%) higher than 1994 due to the inclusion of the combined entities subsequent to August 15, 1995, which produced higher oil and gas sales. This was primarily due to higher volumes of oil production for the period slightly offset by slightly lower gas production and prices (see volume and price table below). Additionally, 1995 includes the revenues from the pipeline joint venture which was acquired from Patrick and contributed $573,000 in the period.
1995 1994 ------------------------ ------------------------ PRODUCTION AVERAGE PRICE PRODUCTION AVERAGE PRICE ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- Gas (Mcf)............... 2,213,923 $ 1.72 2,386,130 $ 1.85 Oil (Bbls).............. 102,731 $16.27 36,487 $15.99
Lease operating expense and production taxes were $345,000 or 50% higher, due to the higher production volumes and depletion, depreciation and amortization was $629,000 or 54% higher than 1994, due to the addition of the Patrick properties subsequent to August 15, 1995, including the amortization of the pipeline joint venture. The Company recorded an impairment from the adoption of FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of in the fourth quarter of 1995 in the amount of $157,000. Additionally, the Company incurred $193,000 of exploration expense in 1995, whereas the 1994 amount was only $4,000 due to La/Cal having virtually no exploration activities. The large variance ($658,000) in general and administrative expenses is due to the fact that La/Cal was provided substantially all of its general and administrative expenses at no cost by an affiliate, whereas the Company provides its own general and administrative services. Additionally, as a public company, the Company incurs a higher level of general and administrative expenses than as a privately held company. Interest expense was $60,000 (6%) higher in 1995 due to the Company (from August 15, 1995 through December 31, 1995) and La/Cal (from January 1, 1995 through August 14, 1995) having slightly higher average debt outstanding in 1995 than La/Cal in 1994. A partial offsetting factor to this was the Company's lower effective interest rate from August 15, 1995 to December 31, 1995. 17 The statements of operations for both periods reflect no income taxes due to: 1) the individual partners of La/Cal being responsible for such taxes for the periods containing the operations of La/Cal only and 2) the Company incurring a loss for the period from August 15, 1995, through December 31, 1995, as a result of the extraordinary item discussed below. In connection with the combination transactions, the Company paid off La/Cal's General Obligation Notes, and the related unamortized debt financing costs of $483,000 were charged to operations as an extraordinary item in the third quarter of 1995. The Company assumed Patrick's Convertible Preferred Stock and has incurred related dividends of $255,000 from August 15, 1995 to December 31, 1995. Liquidity and Capital Resources Net cash provided by operating activities was $4,373,000 in 1996 compared to $3,579,000 in 1995 and $2,823,000 in 1994. The Company's accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows identify major differences between net income and net cash provided by operating activities for each of the years presented. Net cash used by investing activities amounted to $4,163,000 in 1996 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $8,877,000 in 1995 and net cash used of $3,720,000 in 1994. The year ended December 31, 1996 amount is substantially comprised of $3,992,000 in capital expenditures. The year ended December 31, 1995, reflects the receipt by the Company of $9,600,000 cash in September from the sale of the investment in the Penske Corporation as well as $1,514,000 from the sale of certain properties in Michigan, Montana and North Dakota in the fourth quarter. This was offset by the payment by the Company of $1,088,000 in connection with the business combination and $650,000 for capital expenditures. The year ended December 31, 1994 reflects $3,720,000 in capital expenditures, due to extensive drilling and completion activities and acquisition of producing properties by La/Cal during that year. Net cash used by financing activities in 1996 totaled $479,000 compared to $12,553,000 in 1995 and net cash provided by financing activities of $856,000 in 1994. The 1996 amount primarily consists of the borrowing of $1,800,000 against the Company's line of credit partially offset by debt paydowns of $1,550,000 and the payment of preferred stock dividends of $645,000. The 1995 amount included the borrowing of $21,000,000 by the Company which was used primarily to pay off the debt assumed from La/Cal and Patrick ($19,778,000). The remainder of the loan proceeds were used to provide working capital and pay accrued interest. The year ended 1995 also reflects debt paydowns as follows: i) $915,000 by La/Cal on its General Obligation Notes prior to August 15, 1995; ii) $9,500,000 by the Company on its credit facility in September from the Penske sale proceeds; iii) $500,000 by the Company on its credit facility from operations/working capital; iv) $1,250,000 by the Company in the fourth quarter from the sale of certain oil and gas properties. The 1995 amount also includes partnership distributions by La/Cal of $1,133,000 prior to August 15, 1995 and the Company's preferred stock dividends subsequent to the business combination in the amount of $363,000. The 1994 amount consists of La/Cal borrowings ($5,720,000) used to partially fund the significant capital expenditures mentioned above. This was offset by partnership distributions of $3,107,000 and subsequent payments of $1,757,000 on the borrowings. The Company has a credit facility with Compass Bank which provides for a total borrowing base determined by the bank every six months based, in part, on the Company's oil and gas reserve information. Such borrowing base is $12,300,000 as of December 31, 1996. The maturity date for all amounts drawn under the bank credit facility is June 1, 1998. Interest is based on either of two methods at the option of the Company: the bank's prime lending rate or LIBOR plus 2%. Interest rates are set on specific draws for one, two, three or six month periods, also at the option of the Company. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 1996 was 7.7%. The credit facility requires the Company to maintain minimum net worth of $8,500,000 plus 50% of net income, as defined, subsequent to September 30, 1995 and a minimum debt service ratio of 1.25 to 1. The amount outstanding under the credit facility as of December 31, 1996 was $10,000,000. See discussion of 1997 credit facility revisions in "1997 Acquisition" below. 18 The Company plans to incur capital expenditures in the amount of approximately $7,500,000 in calendar year 1997. The Company plans to finance such expenditures from its operating cash flow. The Company's business strategy is to explore and develop drilling prospects along the Gulf Coast and in West Texas and pursue strategic acquisitions of oil and gas properties that offer additional development drilling opportunities. It is anticipated that such acquisitions would be financed with bank or other institutional borrowings or from the issuance of equity securities. 1997 Acquisition On January 31, 1997, the Company acquired the oil and gas properties of La/Cal Energy Partners II ("La/Cal II") and certain working interest owners for a purchase price of $16.5 million ("La/Cal II Acquisition"). The purchase price was comprisedconsisted of $1.5 million cash, the assumption of $7.5 million La/Cal II long-term debt and the issuance of 750,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock of the Company ("Series B Preferred Stock") with an aggregate liquidation value of $7.5 million. In connection with the La/Cal II Acquisition, the Company increased its borrowing base under its credit facility to $22.5 million and borrowed an additional $9 million to payoffretire or (payoff) La/Cal II's debt and to pay the cash portion of the purchase price. The Series B Preferred Stock accrues dividends at a rate of 8.25% per annum and each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into 8.921.12 shares of common stock. Such shares are redeemable by the Company after January 31, 2001 at $10.00 per share. Results of Operations Year ended December 31, 1998 versus year ended December 31, 1997--Total revenues in 1998 amounted to $10,592,000 and were $2,309,000 (18%) lower than total revenues in 1997 due to lower oil and gas revenues and the loss of revenues from the pipeline joint venture. Oil and gas sales were $1,515,000 lower due primarily to lower oil and gas prices, partially offset by higher production volumes. Revenues from the pipeline joint venture were $-0- in 1998 compared to $1,078,000 in 1997 due to the sale of the asset in the fourth quarter of 1997. The following table reflects the production volumes and pricing information for the periods presented:
1998 1997 ------------------------ ------------------------ Production Average Price Production Average Price ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- Gas (Mcf)............... 2,782,825 $ 2.18 2,449,320 $ 2.55 Oil (Bbls).............. 316,768 $11.88 282,380 $18.06
Lease operating expense and production taxes were $2,822,000 for 1998 compared to $2,316,000 for 1997, or $506,000 higher, due primarily to the Company not incurring, in the 1997 period, ad valorem taxes related to the La/Cal II properties which were the responsibility of the La/Cal II partners. Additionally, the 1998 period includes eight additional producing wells and twelve months of lease operating expense and production taxes for the La/Cal II properties, compared to eleven months for 1997 due to the effective date of the acquisition being January 31, 1997. Depletion, depreciation and amortization was $4,094,000 in 1998 versus $4,863,000 in 1997, or $769,000 lower, substantially due to no amortization of the pipeline joint venture in 1998 compared to $741,000 in 1997. The Company incurred $6,010,000 of exploration expense in 1998 compared to $3,206,000 in 1997. Included in the 1998 exploration expense is $3,684,000 of costs related to dry holes during the period versus $2,342,000 of such costs in 1997. The Company recorded an impairment in the recorded value of certain oil and gas properties in the fourth quarter of 1998 in the amount of $1,076,000 due to lower oil prices and higher than expected depletion rates. This compares to an impairment of $550,000 recorded in the same period a year ago. Interest expense was $1,910,000 in 1998 compared to $1,417,000 (35% higher) due to the Company having higher average debt outstanding, slightly offset by a lower effective interest rate in 1998 compared to 1997. General and administrative expenses amounted to $2,399,000 for 1998 versus $2,628,000 in 1997. 13 The Company's preferred stock dividends amounted to $1,256,000 for 1998 compared to $1,205,000 in 1997 or $51,000 higher due to twelve months of dividends being paid on the Company's Series B Preferred Stock in the current year versus eleven months in the prior year. Year ended December 31, 1997 versus year ended December 31, 1996--Total revenues in 1997 increased to $12,901,000 and were $3,132,000 (32%) higher than total revenues in 1996 due to increased oil and gas revenues, offset by lower revenues from the pipeline joint venture. Oil and gas sales were $3,664,000 higher due substantially to increased revenues as a result of the La/Cal II acquisition (effective January 31, 1997) along with increased gas volumes on the pre-acquisition properties, offset somewhat by lower oil and gas prices. Revenues from the pipeline joint venture were $459,000 lower in 1997 due to the sale of the asset in the fourth quarter of 1997. The following table reflects the production volumes and pricing information for the periods presented:
1997 1996 ------------------------ ------------------------ Production Average Price Production Average Price ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- Gas (Mcf)............... 2,449,320 $ 2.55 1,623,377 $ 2.60 Oil (Bbls).............. 282,380 $18.06 165,964 $20.88
Lease operating expense and production taxes were $2,316,000 for 1997 compared to $1,615,000 for 1996 or $701,000 higher due primarily to the addition of the La/Cal II properties. Depletion, depreciation and amortization was $4,863,000 versus $3,788,000 for 1996 or $1,075,000 higher due to the addition of the La/Cal II properties, offset by approximately $300,000 less amortization of the pipeline joint venture. Included in depletion, depreciation and amortization is depletion of oil and gas properties of $4,066,000 and $2,684,000, respectively. The Company incurred $3,206,000 of exploration expense in 1997 compared to $1,149,000 in 1996. Included in the 1997 exploration expense is $2,342,000 of costs related to dry holes during the period versus $542,000 of such costs in 1996. The Company recorded impairments in the recorded value of certain oil and gas properties in 1997 in the amount of $550,000. Interest expense was $1,417,000 in 1997 compared to $828,000 due to borrowings by the Company of $9,000,000 on January 31, 1997 in connection with the La/Cal II Acquisition, resulting in higher average debt outstanding than for the prior year. General and administrative expenses amounted to $2,628,000 for 1997 versus $2,096,000 in 1996 due largely to expenses associated with the addition of six employees in 1997. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of its interest in the pipeline joint venture of $688,000 in 1997. The Company's preferred stock dividends amounted to $1,205,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 compared to $645,000 for 1996. The increase was due to dividends paid on the Company's Series B Convertible Preferred Stock issued on January 31, 1997 in connection with the La/Cal II Acquisition. Liquidity and Capital Resources Net cash provided by operating activities was $4,517,000 in 1998 compared to $6,633,000 in 1997 and $4,292,000 in 1996. The Company's accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows identify major differences between net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities for each of the years presented. Net cash used by investing activities amounted to $14,959,000 in 1998 compared to $6,007,000 in 1997 and $4,082,000 in 1996. The year ended December 31, 1998 is composed almost entirely of cash paid for 14 exploration and drilling capital expenditures of $14,879,000. The year ended December 31, 1997 reflects non-acquisition capital expenditures of $9,157,000 and of cash paid in connection with the purchase of oil and gas properties of $2,075,000. These amounts were offset by proceeds from sale of the Company's interest in the pipeline joint venture ($3,564,000) and sale of certain oil and gas properties located in Montana. The year ended December 31, 1996 amount is substantially comprised of $3,911,000 in capital expenditures. Net cash provided by financing activities was $9,744,000 in 1998 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $177,000 in 1997 and $479,000 in 1996. The 1998 amount includes the borrowing of $11,500,000 by the Company under its line of credit offset by paydowns during the year of $500,000. Preferred stock dividends in 1998 amounted to $1,256,000 (Series A and Series B). The 1997 amount includes the borrowing of $9,000,000 by the Company under its line of credit which was used to pay off the debt assumed in the La/Cal II Acquisition and to pay the cash portion of the purchase price. The 1997 amount also includes other borrowings of $3,000,000 against its line of credit offset by paydowns during the year of $3,500,000 and the payoff of La/Cal II debt of $7,464,000. Preferred stock dividends in 1997 amounted to $1,205,000 (Series A and Series B). The 1996 amount primarily consists of the borrowing of $1,800,000 against the Company's line of credit partially offset by debt paydowns of $1,550,000 and the payment of preferred stock dividends of $645,000 (Series A only). At December 31, 1998, the Company was not in compliance with a restrictive covenant of its existing credit facility and, accordingly, the entire principal amount outstanding is presented in current maturities of long-term debt. The amount outstanding under the credit facility as of December 31, 1998 was $29,500,000. On March 29, 1999 the Company signed a preliminary agreement with Compass Bank to restructure its existing credit facility. The preliminary credit agreement will allow the Company to be in compliance with all covenants upon execution of the agreement. The preliminary agreement provides for a borrowing base facility of $20,500,000 with monthly reductions of $50,000 on April 1, 1999 and May 1, 1999, $200,000 on June 1, 1999 and $300,000 on July 1, 1999 and each month thereafter. Semi-annual borrowing base determinations will be made beginning July 1, 1999 based in part on the Company's oil and gas reserve information. The maturity date for amounts drawn under the Borrowing Base facility is February 1, 2001. Interest on such facility is based on LIBOR plus 2% and rates are set on specific draws for one, two, three or six month periods at the option of the Company. The preliminary agreement also establishes a Tranche A facility in the amount of $9,000,000. The maturity date for the Tranche A facility is December 1, 1999. The Tranche A requires that excess cash flow from operations, as defined in the preliminary agreement, be applied to outstanding principal and interest until the maturity date, with interest based on the Compass Bank Index Rate plus 2%. The preliminary agreement requires the net proceeds of asset sales be used to extinguish outstanding principal and interest under the borrowing base facility and Tranche A. Additionally, under the terms of the preliminary agreement, the Company may not make any distributions or pay dividends, including dividends on any class of its preferred stock, until Tranche A is paid in full. Additionally, budgeted capital expenditures are required to be approved by the Lender prior to closing, and such approval shall be effective for a period of six months or until such time as an increase is requested. Furthermore, provided actual capital expenditures do not exceed the approved budgeted amount, the determination of capital expenditures is at the sole discretion of the Company. The preliminary agreement also requires that the Company's vendor accounts payable balance shall not exceed $2,500,000 as of June 30, 1999. The Company's vendor accounts payable balance was $3,721,000 at December 31, 1998. The preliminary agreement is subject to definitive documentation and Lender credit approval. The terms of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock provide that the Company will not incur additional debt after such time as it reports financial results which show the Company's stockholders' equity to be less than the liquidation preference of the Series A Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 1998, the Company's stockholders' equity was approximately $4.9 million and the liquidation preference on the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock was approximately $7.9 million. As a result, the Company is unable to incur additional debt under its credit facility or from other sources at the present time. 15 Due to the Company's existing current working capital deficiency, required pay downs under its credit facility and the restrictions imposed by the Series A Preferred Stock, management is exploring a number of alternatives that are directed toward making the Company profitable and improving its liquidity. The principal strategies include: 1) raising additional capital through the issuance of equity securities, or a combination of equity and subordinated debt; 2) acquisition of value enhancing oil and gas properties that offer additional development opportunities and increased cash flow; 3) mergers and/or acquisitions by other entities; 4) reducing operating costs; 5) sale of certain oil and gas properties; 6) renegotiation or amendment of the Company's credit facility and capital structure As with any plan of this nature, its ultimate realization will depend upon the cooperation of creditors, potential investors and others. As a result, the outcome of the plan cannot presently be determined and no adjustments related to the specific considerations of management's plan have been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Should the plan not be completed, the Company may not be able to liquidate liabilities as they come due. In addition, the Company's current liquidity situation and its agreement with Compass Bank have resulted in a suspension of new drilling expenditures until such time as certain aforementioned principle strategies have been effected. Quarterly Cash Dividends The Company announced on March 23, 1999 that it has suspended payment of its regular quarterly cash dividend on both classes of its Preferred Stock. This measure was taken to conserve cash for corporate and operating purposes and was precipitated by the recent drop in commodity prices. The Company has no plans to reinstate the cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Year 2000 The Company is in the process of assessing the ability of its various electronic operating systems, and those of significant third parties, to appropriately consider periods and dates after December 31, 1999. The Company's senior financial management has taken responsibility for identifying, addressing and monitoring its Year 2000 issues. These individuals report to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on a periodic basis. For Company systems identified as not being Year 2000 compliant, the Company has developed plans to correct these systems and expects to be compliant on the systems by the second quarter of 1999. As for third parties with which the Company has a material relationship, the Company is in various stages of discussions and conclusions related to the ability of those third parties to become compliant and the related timing thereof. The estimated costs associated with becoming Year 2000 compliant are not expected to be material to the Company. The Company has begun, but not yet completed, a comprehensive analysis of the operational problems and costs (including loss of revenues) that would be reasonably likely to result from the failure by the Company and certain third parties to complete efforts necessary to achieve Year 2000 compliance timely. A contingency plan has not been developed for dealing with the most reasonably likely worst case scenario, and such scenario has not yet been clearly identified. The Company currently plans to complete such analysis and contingency planning by the second quarter of 1999. The failure to correct a material Year 2000 problem could result in an interruption in, or failure of, certain normal business activities or operations. Such failures could materially and adversely affect the Company's 16 results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. Due to the general uncertainty inherent in the Year 2000 problem, resulting in part from the uncertainty of the Year 2000 readiness of third-party suppliers and customers, the Company is unable to determine at this time whether the consequences of Year 2000 failures will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. The Company's Year 2000 efforts are expected to significantly reduce the Company's level of uncertainty about the Year 2000 problem. The Company believes that, with the implementation of new business systems and completion of the various above-mentioned tasks as scheduled, the possibility of interruptions to normal operations should be significantly reduced. Stock Listing The Company was notified by the New York Stock Exchange that it is not in compliance with certain of the Exchange's minimum financial criteria for listed companies. The Company submitted a three-year business plan to the Exchange in response to the notice. The Exchange accepted the Company's business plan and will monitor its compliance with the plan on a quarterly basis. As described above, the Company's liquidity situation may make it difficult for the Company to adhere to this business plan. If the Company fails to do so, there can be no assurance that the New York Stock Exchange will not delist the Company common stock. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Debt and debt-related derivatives The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its short-term and long-term debt with variable interest rates ($29.5 million at December 31, 1998). Based on the overall interest rate exposure on variable rate debt at December 31, 1998 a hypothetical 2% change in the interest rates would not materially affect the Company's financial position, net income or liquidity. Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding reserve estimates, planned capital expenditures, future oil and gas production and prices, future drilling activity, the Company's financial position, the ability to become year 2000 compliant, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, are forward- lookingforward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond the control of the Company. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact way, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates made by different engineers often vary from one another. In addition, results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate may justify revisions of such estimate and such revisions, if significant, would change the schedule of any further production and development drilling. Accordingly, reserve estimates are generally different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. Additional important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations include changes in oil and gas prices, changes in regulatory or environmental policies, production difficulties, transportation difficulties and future drilling results. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by such factors. 1917 ITEMItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATAFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Board of Directors and Stockholders Goodrich Petroleum Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 19961998 and 1995,1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1996.1998. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 19961998 and 1995,1997, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1996,1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note Dnote C to the consolidated financial statements, in 1995,working capital deficiencies, required payments under the Company adoptedcredit facility and restrictions imposed by the provisionsCompany's Series A Preferred Stock raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are discussed in note C. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of Financial Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of.this uncertainty. KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP Shreveport, Louisiana March 4, 1997 2029, 1999 18 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBERDecember 31, DECEMBERDecember 31, 1998 1997 ASSETS 1996 1995 ------ ------------ ------------ CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents..........................equivalents.............................. $ 344,55195,630 $ 613,450793,358 Marketable equity securities....................... 569,700 759,600securities........................... 358,700 844,000 Accounts receivable Trade and other, net of allowance............... 744,221 170,593allowance.................... 2,197,179 1,354,776 Accrued oil and gas revenue...................... 1,482,503 1,014,709 Accrued pipeline joint venture................... 532,000 530,792revenue.......................... 1,089,226 1,641,969 Prepaid insurance.................................. 235,578 302,113 Other.............................................. 4,888 33,532 -----------insurance...................................... 184,898 174,201 Other.................................................. -- 4,000 ------------ ----------- Total current assets............................. 3,913,441 3,424,789 -----------assets................................. 3,925,633 4,812,304 ------------ ----------- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Oil and gas properties............................. 19,129,512 16,262,033properties................................. 53,320,832 41,154,687 Furniture, fixtures and equipment.................. 107,056 101,333equipment...................... 195,279 180,966 ------------ ----------- ----------- 19,236,568 16,363,36653,516,111 41,335,653 Less accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization...................................... (4,918,856) (2,217,425)amortization.......................................... (13,720,009) (8,869,783) ------------ ----------- Net property and equipment........................... 39,796,102 32,465,870 ------------ ----------- OTHER ASSETS............................................. 314,853 259,744 TOTAL ASSETS......................................... $ 44,036,588 $37,537,918 ============ =========== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Current portion of long term debt...................... 29,500,000 -- Accounts payable....................................... 7,763,507 1,996,887 Accrued liabilities.................................... 1,813,693 2,708,355 ------------ ----------- Total current liabilities............................ 39,077,200 4,705,242 ------------ ----------- LONG TERM DEBT........................................... -- 18,500,000 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock; authorized 10,000,000 shares: Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; issued and outstanding 796,318 shares (liquidating preference $10 per share, aggregating to $7,963,180).......................................... 796,318 796,318 Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; issued and outstanding 750,000 shares (liquidation preference $10 per share, aggregating to $7,500,000).......................................... 750,000 750,000 Common stock, par value $0.20 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,247,703 and 5,232,403 shares.................................. 1,049,541 1,046,481 Additional paid-in capital............................. 15,226,027 15,146,095 Accumulated deficit.................................... (12,461,598) (3,490,618) Accumulated other comprehensive income................. (400,900) 84,400 ------------ ----------- Total stockholders' equity........................... 4,959,388 14,332,676 ------------ ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY......... $ 44,036,588 $37,537,918 ============ ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 19 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, ----------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 ------------ ---------- --------- REVENUES Oil and gas sales....................... $ 9,836,863 11,351,586 7,687,748 Pipeline joint venture.................. -- 1,078,397 1,537,806 Other................................... 755,010 471,378 543,829 ------------ ---------- --------- Total revenues........................ 10,591,873 12,901,361 9,769,383 ------------ ---------- --------- COSTS AND EXPENSES Lease operating expense and production taxes.................................. 2,821,515 2,316,006 1,614,584 Depletion, depreciation and amortization........................... 4,094,447 4,862,754 3,788,292 Exploration............................. 6,010,425 3,205,730 1,149,240 Impairment of oil and gas properties.... 1,075,853 549,792 -- Interest expense........................ 1,909,849 1,416,675 828,394 General and administrative.............. 2,399,332 2,627,672 2,095,856 ------------ ---------- --------- Total costs and expenses.............. 18,311,421 14,978,629 9,476,366 ------------ ---------- --------- GAIN ON SALES OF ASSETS................... 4,206 688,304 88,428 ------------ ---------- --------- INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES......... (7,715,342) (1,388,964) 381,445 Income Taxes............................ -- -- -- ------------ ---------- --------- NET INCOME (LOSS)......................... (7,715,342) (1,388,964) 381,445 Preferred stock dividends............... 1,255,638 1,205,210 644,800 ------------ ---------- --------- LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK........... $ (8,970,980) (2,594,174) (263,355) ============ ========== ========= BASIC LOSS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE....... $ (1.71) (.50) (.05) ============ ========== ========= DILUTED LOSS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE..... $ (1.71) (.50) (.05) ============ ========== ========= AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING......... 5,243,105 5,229,307 5,225,564
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 20 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, ------------------------------------ 1998 1997 1996 ----------- ----------- Total property---------- OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (loss)....................... $(7,715,342) (1,388,964) 381,445 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depletion, depreciation and equipment..................... 14,317,712 14,145,941amortization.......................... 4,094,447 4,862,754 3,788,292 Amortization of leasehold costs........ 1,016,649 288,037 195,027 Amortization of deferred debt financing costs................................. -- 27,694 72,329 Gain on sale of assets................. (4,206) (688,304) (88,428) Capital expenditures charged to income................................ 4,382,514 2,341,954 678,213 Impairment of oil and gas properties... 1,075,853 549,792 -- Payment of other liabilities........... (107,625) (321,040) (364,100) Other.................................. (160,518) (87,357) (11,714) ----------- ----------- OTHER ASSETS Investment---------- 2,581,772 5,584,566 4,651,064 Net change in (exclusive of acquisition): Accounts receivable................... (289,660) 520,391 (1,042,630) Prepaid insurance and other........... (71,550) 73,933 95,179 Accounts payable...................... 2,975,821 (157,334) 370,418 Accrued liabilities................... (679,620) 611,069 218,045 ----------- ----------- ---------- Net cash provided by operating activities.......................... 4,516,763 6,632,625 4,292,076 ----------- ----------- ---------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from sale of pipeline joint venture, net.......... 3,616,360 4,676,500 Deferred chargesventure................................ -- 3,564,000 -- Proceeds from sales of oil and other investments............. 551,471 135,486gas properties............................. 49,091 370,000 325,628 Acquisition of oil and gas properties... (129,325) (2,074,866) (234,378) Capital expenditures.................... (14,878,619) (7,866,173) (3,911,144) Other................................... -- -- (261,668) ----------- ----------- 4,167,831 4,811,986---------- Net cash used in investing activities.......................... (14,958,853) (6,007,039) (4,081,562) ----------- ----------- TOTAL ASSETS................................... $22,398,984 $22,382,716---------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from bank borrowings........... 11,500,000 12,000,000 1,800,000 Principal payments of bank borrowings... (500,000) (10,963,919) (1,550,000) Preferred stock dividends............... (1,255,638) (1,205,210) (644,800) Retirement of preferred stock........... -- (7,650) (74,357) Payment of debt financing costs......... -- -- (10,256) ----------- ----------- ---------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities................ 9,744,362 (176,779) (479,413) ----------- ----------- ---------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS............................. (697,728) 448,807 (268,899) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD.................................. 793,358 344,551 613,450 ----------- ----------- ---------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD.................................. $ 95,630 793,358 344,551 =========== =========== ========== NON CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES Accrued Capital Expenditures............ 1,981,276 1,290,658 81,230
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 21 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 1996 1995 ------------------------------------Series A Series B Preferred Stock Preferred Stock Common Stock ----------------- ---------------- --------------------- Accumulated Partners' Number Number Additional Other Capital of Par of Par Number Paid-In Accumulated Comprehensive (Deficit) Shares Value Shares Value of Shares* Par Value* Capital* Deficit Income --------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------------------- CURRENT LIABILITIES Current portion of long term debt....................... $ Balance at December 31, 1995............. $-- 734,859 734,859 -- $ -- Accounts payable........................................ 1,108,534 656,886 Accrued liabilities..................................... 1,994,730 1,740,028 ----------- -----------5,225,564 1,045,113 8,515,929 (633,089) -- Net income....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 381,445 -- Unrealized Change in Marketable Equitable Securities....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (189,900) Total current liabilities............................. 3,103,264 2,396,914 ----------- ----------- LONG TERM DEBT............................................ 10,000,000 9,750,000 OTHER LIABILITIES......................................... 160,520 572,990 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYComprehensive Income (Loss).... Preferred stock par value $1.00dividends--Series A ($.80 per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issuedshare)........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (644,800) -- Retirement of preferred stock.. -- (10,000) (10,000) -- -- -- -- (64,357) -- -- Reinstatement of preferred stock under Appraisal rights........... -- 76,290 76,290 -- -- -- -- (76,290) -- -- --- ------- -------- ------- -------- --------- ---------- ----------- ------------ --------- Balance at December 31, 1996............. $-- 801,149 801,149 -- -- 5,225,564 1,045,113 8,375,282 (896,444) (189,900) Net loss......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,388,964) -- Unrealized Change in Marketable Equitable Securities....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 274,300 Total Comprehensive Income (Loss).... Issuance of Series B Preferred Stock.. -- -- -- 750,000 750,000 -- -- 6,750,000 -- -- Preferred stock dividends Series A ($.80 per share)....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (638,023) -- Series B ($.76 per share)...... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (567,187) -- Conversion of preferred stock to Common stock.. -- (3,831) (3,831) -- -- 2,993 599 3,232 -- -- Employee Stock grants........... -- -- -- -- -- 3,846 769 24,231 -- -- Retirement of Series A preferred stock.. -- (1,000) (1,000) -- -- -- -- (6,650) -- -- --- ------- -------- ------- -------- --------- ---------- ----------- ------------ --------- Balance at December 31, 1997............. $-- 796,318 796,318 750,000 750,000 5,232,403 1,046,481 15,146,095 (3,490,618) 84,400 Net loss......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (7,715,342) -- Unrealized Change in Marketable Equitable Securities....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (485,300) Total Comprehensive Income (Loss).... Preferred stock dividends........ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,255,638) -- Employee and 734,859 shares (liquidating preference $10director stock grants........... -- -- -- -- -- 15,302 3,060 79,932 -- -- --- ------- -------- ------- -------- --------- ---------- ----------- ------------ --------- Balance at December 31, 1998............. $-- 796,318 $796,318 750,000 $750,000 5,247,705 $1,049,541 $15,226,027 $(12,461,598) $(400,900) === ======= ======== ======= ======== ========= ========== =========== ============ ========= Total Stockholders' Equity ------------- Balance at December 31, 1995............. 9,662,812 Net income....... 381,445 Unrealized Change in Marketable Equitable Securities....... (189,900) ------------- Total Comprehensive Income (Loss).... 191,545 Preferred stock dividends--Series A ($.80 per share, aggregatingshare)........... (644,800) Retirement of preferred stock.. (74,357) Reinstatement of preferred stock under Appraisal rights........... -- ------------- Balance at December 31, 1996............. 9,135,200 Net loss......... (1,388,964) Unrealized Change in Marketable Equitable Securities....... 274,300 ------------- Total Comprehensive Income (Loss).... (1,114,664) Issuance of Series B Preferred Stock.. 7,500,000 Preferred stock dividends Series A ($.80 per share)....... (638,023) Series B ($.76 per share)...... (567,187) Conversion of preferred stock to $8,011,490Common stock.. -- Employee Stock grants........... 25,000 Retirement of Series A preferred stock.. (7,650) ------------- Balance at December 31, 1997............. 14,332,676 Net loss......... (7,715,342) Unrealized Change in Marketable Equitable Securities....... (485,300) ------------- Total Comprehensive Income (Loss).... (8,200,642) Preferred stock dividends........ (1,255,638) Employee and $7,348,590)............................. 801,149 734,859 Commondirector stock par value--$0.20 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 41,804,510 shares................................................. 8,360,902 8,360,902 Additional paid-in capital.............................. 1,059,493 1,200,140 Accumulated deficit..................................... (896,444) (633,089) Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities......... (189,900) -- ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity............................ 9,135,200 9,662,812 ----------- ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.......... $22,398,984 $22,382,716 =========== ===========grants........... 82,992 ------------- Balance at December 31, 1998............. $4,959,388 =============
- - ----- * All share and dollar amounts have been restated to retroactively reflect the March 1998 reverse stock split See notes to consolidated financial statements. 22 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 1996 1995 1994 ----------- ---------- ---------- REVENUES Oil and gas sales........................ $ 7,687,748 5,477,208 4,995,663 Pipeline joint venture................... 1,537,806 573,393 -- Other.................................... 632,257 123,811 17,783 ----------- ---------- ---------- Total revenues......................... 9,857,811 6,174,412 5,013,446 ----------- ---------- ---------- COSTS AND EXPENSES Lease operating expense and production taxes................................... 1,614,584 1,029,501 684,131 Depletion, depreciation and amortization. 3,788,292 1,785,502 1,156,624 Exploration.............................. 1,149,240 193,159 4,240 Impairment of oil and gas properties..... -- 157,000 -- Interest expense......................... 828,394 1,132,488 1,072,098 General and administrative............... 2,095,856 739,451 81,535 ----------- ---------- ---------- Total costs and expenses............... 9,476,366 5,037,101 2,998,628 ----------- ---------- ---------- INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM AND INCOME TAXES..................................... 381,445 1,137,311 2,014,818 Income Taxes............................. -- -- -- ----------- ---------- ---------- INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM........... 381,445 1,137,311 2,014,818 Extraordinary item-early extinguishment of debt................................. -- (482,906) -- ----------- ---------- ---------- NET INCOME................................. 381,445 654,405 2,014,818 ========== Preferred stock dividends................ 644,800 254,932 ----------- ---------- EARNINGS (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK. $ (263,355) 399,473 =========== ========== LOSS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE.............. $ (.01) =========== AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING.......... $41,804,510 =========== PRO FORMA INFORMATION (UNAUDITED): Income before extraordinary item and income taxes..................................... $1,137,311 2,014,818 Pro forma income taxes*.................... 402,698 785,779 ---------- ---------- 734,613 1,229,039 Extraordinary item-early extinguishment of debt................................. (482,906) -- ---------- ---------- Pro forma net income..................... 251,707 1,229,039 Preferred stock dividends................ 254,932 -- ---------- ---------- Pro forma earnings (loss) available to common stock.............................. $ (3,225) 1,229,039 ========== ========== Pro forma income before extraordinary item per average common share.................. $ .02 .06 Pro forma extraordinary item per average common share.............................. (.02) -- ---------- ---------- Pro forma earnings (loss) per average common share.............................. $ -- .06 ========== ========== Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding**............................. 27,722,543 19,765,226 ========== ==========
- -------- * As described in Noted D, no provision for income taxes is included in the consolidated statements of operations for the period from January 1, 1995 through August 14, 1995 and for the year ended December 31, 1994, for the operations of La/Cal Energy Partners (predecessor company), due to La/Cal being a partnership and income taxes were the responsibility of the individual partners of La/Cal. Certain unaudited pro forma information relating to the Company's results of operations had La/Cal been a corporation, is shown here. ** For purposes of this presentation the number of pro forma shares used for periods prior to August 15, 1995, is 19,765,226 shares, the number issued by the Company in exchange for La/Cal's net assets contributed. See notes to consolidated financial statements. 23 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------- 1996 1995 1994 ----------- ------------ ----------- OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income........................... $ 381,445 654,405 2,014,818 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depletion, depreciation and amortization...................... 3,788,292 1,785,502 1,156,624 Amortization of leasehold costs.... 195,027 84,174 -- Amortization of deferred debt financing costs................... 72,329 101,531 112,530 Gain on Sale of oil and gas properties........................ (88,428) -- -- Extraordinary item-early extinguishment of debt............ -- 482,906 -- Capital expenditures charged to income............................ 678,213 108,985 4,240 Impairment of oil and gas properties........................ -- 157,000 -- Payment of other liabilities....... (364,100) (130,010) -- Other.............................. (11,714) -- -- ----------- ------------ ----------- 4,651,064 3,244,493 3,288,212 Net change in: Accounts receivable.............. (1,042,630) (28,773) (454,610) Prepaid insurance and other...... 95,179 (319,043) -- Accounts payable................. 451,648 493,343 (72,846) Accrued liabilities.............. 218,045 188,905 61,831 ----------- ------------ ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities.................... 4,373,306 3,578,925 2,822,587 ----------- ------------ ----------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES Sale of investment................... -- 9,600,000 -- Purchase of other investment......... (250,000) -- -- Proceeds from sales of oil and gas properties.......................... 325,628 1,514,336 -- Cash paid in connection with business combinations........................ (234,378) (1,088,432) -- Overdraft bank balances assumed in business combination................ -- (451,414) -- Capital expenditures................. (3,992,374) (649,604) (3,719,782) Other................................ (11,668) (47,883) -- ----------- ------------ ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.......... (4,162,792) 8,877,003 (3,719,782) ----------- ------------ ----------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from bank borrowings........ 1,800,000 21,000,000 5,719,933 Principal payments of bank borrowings.......................... (1,550,000) (31,942,841) (1,756,856) Partnership distributions............ -- (1,132,735) (3,107,258) Payment of debt financing costs...... (10,256) (114,771) -- Retirement of preferred stock........ (74,357) -- -- Preferred stock dividends............ (644,800) (362,893) -- ----------- ------------ ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.......... (479,413) (12,553,240) 855,819 ----------- ------------ ----------- NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS........................... (268,899) (97,312) (41,376) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD............................. 613,450 710,762 752,138 ----------- ------------ ----------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD................................. $ 344,551 613,450 710,762 =========== ============ ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 24 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK TOTAL PARTNERS' -------------------- --------------------- ADDITIONAL UNREALIZED LOSS STOCKHOLDERS' CAPITAL NUMBER NUMBER PAID-IN ACCUMULATED ON MARKETABLE EQUITY (DEFICIT) OF SHARES PAR VALUE OF SHARES PAR VALUE CAPITAL DEFICIT EQUITY SECURITIES (DEFICIT) ----------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------------- ------------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1993........... $ (988,777) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $ (988,777) Partnership distributions.. (3,107,258) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (3,107,258) Net Income...... 2,014,818 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,014,818 ----------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- ----------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994........... (2,081,217) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (2,081,217) Partnership distributions.. (1,229,344) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,229,344) Business Combination.... 3,310,561 1,098,710 1,098,710 39,530,452 7,906,090 258,539 -- -- 12,573,900 Conversion of preferred stock.......... -- (363,851) (363,851) 2,274,058 454,812 (90,961) -- -- -- Preferred stock dividends ($.30 per share)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- (254,932) -- (254,932) Net income...... -- -- -- -- -- 1,032,562 (378,157) -- 654,405 ----------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- ----------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995........... -- 734,859 734,859 41,804,510 8,360,902 1,200,140 (633,089) -- 9,662,812 Net income...... -- -- -- -- -- -- 381,445 -- 381,445 Unrealized depreciation of marketable securities available for sale........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (189,900) (189,900) Preferred stock dividends ($.80 per share)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- (644,800) -- (644,800) Retirement of preferred stock.......... -- (10,000) (10,000) -- -- (64,357) -- -- (74,357) Reinstatement of preferred stock under appraisal rights......... -- 76,290 76,290 -- -- (76,290) -- -- -- ----------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- ----------- BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996........... $ -- 801,149 $ 801,149 41,804,510 $8,360,902 $1,059,493 $(896,444) $(189,900) $ 9,135,200 =========== ========= ========= ========== ========== ========== ========= ========= ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 25 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBERDecember 31, 19961998 NOTE A--DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESSA--Description of Business The Company is in the primary business of the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. The Subsidiariessubsidiaries have interests in such operations in eightseven states, primarily in Louisiana and Texas. TheTwo of the Company's subsidiaries also havehad a minority interest in a natural gas pipeline joint venture located in the state of Texas.Texas until such interest was sold in 1997. NOTE B--BUSINESS COMBINATIONB--Business Combinations On August 15, 1995,January 31, 1997, the transactions contemplated byCompany acquired the Agreementoil and Plangas properties of Merger among Patrick Petroleum Company ("Patrick"), La/Cal Energy Partners II ("La/Cal"Cal II"), Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), and Goodrich Acquisition, Inc. were completed. The Agreement providedcertain working interest owners for a combinationpurchase price of Patrick$16.5 million ("La/Cal II Acquisition"). The purchase price was comprised of $1.5 million cash, the assumption of $7.5 million of La/Cal II long-term debt and the issuance of 750,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock of the Company ("Series B Preferred Stock") with an aggregate liquidation value of $7.5 million. In connection with the La/Cal asII Acquisition, the Company borrowed an additional $9 million under its bank credit facility, which was used to repay $7.5 million of La/Cal II debt and to pay the $1.5 million cash portion of the purchase price. The Series B Preferred Stock has a resultdividend rate of which the businesses previously conducted by Patrick8.25% per annum and La/Caleach share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into 1.12 shares of common stock. Such shares are now conductedredeemable by the Company which is a Delaware corporation formed for the purpose of consummating such transactions, and its subsidiaries.after January 31, 2001 at $10.00 per share. The combination of Patrick and La/Cal II acquisition was effected primarily by two concurrent transactions: (a) the contribution by La/Cal of all of its assets and liabilities (excluding cash and accounts receivable accrued prior to March 1, 1995, and interest thereon) to the Company in exchange for 19,765,226 shares of the Company's common stock (the "Common Stock") and (b) the merger of Goodrich Acquisition with and into Patrick (the "Merger") whereby (i) each outstanding share of Patrick common stock ("Patrick Common Stock") was converted into one share of Common Stock; (ii) each outstanding share of Patrick Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was converted into one share of the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and (iii) Patrick, the surviving corporation in the Merger, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. La/Cal was formed, by the contribution of certain oil and gas properties owned by the partners, on July 15, 1993, pursuant to the provisions of the State of Louisiana, for the purpose of engaging in the domestic exploration for oil and gas reserves primarily in the States of Louisiana and Texas. Under the provisions of the Agreement of Partnership, the business of La/Cal was to acquire interests in leases within a defined program area in Louisiana and certain railroad districts in East Texas (as amended from time to time) and drill primarily development wells. La/Cal also engaged in the development, production, and sale of any commercial accumulations of oil and gas discovered. Profits, losses, and distributable cash were allocated to the individual partners as defined in the Partnership Agreement. NOTE C--BASIS OF PRESENTATION The combination transactions were accounted for as a purchase business combination in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, Business Combinations whereby La/Cal was deemed to be the acquiror and Patrick the acquiree. Accordingly, on August 15, 1995, the Company recorded the assets and liabilities of Patrick at fair value, whereas the assets and liabilities of La/Cal are reflected at historical book value. The consolidated financial statements reflect the operations solely of La/Cal for periods prior to August 15, 1995, whereas such financial statements reflect the operations of the combined entities for periods subsequentrelated properties are included in the Company's results of operations effective January 31, 1997. NOTE C--Liquidity and Management's Plan Liquidity--As disclosed in Note G, the Company's current liabilities include the outstanding principal balance under the Company's credit facility of $29,500,000. Additionally, the Company is unable to August 15, 1995.incur additional debt under its credit facility or from any other sources until such time as its stockholders' equity balance is greater than the liquidation preference of the Series A Preferred Stock of approximately $7.9 million. Management's Plan--Due to the Company's existing current working capital deficiency, required pay downs under its credit facility and the restrictions imposed by the Series A Preferred Stock, management is exploring a number of alternatives that are directed toward making the Company profitable and improving its liquidity. The principal strategies include: 1) raising additional capital through the issuance of equity securities; or a combination of equity and subordinated debt; 2) acquisition of value enhancing oil and gas properties that offer additional development opportunities and increased cash flow; 3) mergers and/or acquisitions by other entities; 4) reducing operating costs; 5) sale of certain oil and gas properties; 6) renegotiation or amendment of the Company's credit facility and capital structure As with any plan of this nature, its ultimate realization will depend upon the cooperation of creditors, potential investors and others. As a result, the outcome of the plan cannot presently be determined and no 23 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) December 31, 1998 adjustments related to the specific considerations of management's plan have been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Should the plan not be completed, the Company may not be able to liquidate liabilities as they come due. NOTE D--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESD--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation--The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, and one of its wholly-owned subsidiary's fourthree wholly-owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Oil and gas revenues--Oil and gas revenues are recorded using the accrual method of accounting. 26 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996 Property and Equipment--The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for exploration and development expenditures. Leasehold acquisition costs are capitalized. When proved reserves are found on an undeveloped property, leasehold cost is reclassified to proved properties. Significant undeveloped leases are reviewed periodically, and a valuation allowance is provided for any estimated decline in value. Cost of all other undeveloped leases is amortized over the estimated average holding period of the leases. Costs of exploratory drilling are initially capitalized, but if proved reserves are not found, the costs are subsequently expensed. All other exploratory costs are charged to expense as incurred. Development costs are capitalized, including the cost of unsuccessful development wells. During the fourth quarter of 1995, theThe Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. Underfollows SFAS No. 121 and recognizes an impairment is determined to have occurred and a loss is recognized when the net of future cash inflows expected to be generated by an identifiable long-livedlong- lived asset and cash outflows expected to be required to obtain those cash inflows is less than the carrying value of the asset. The Company performs this comparison for its oil and gas properties on a field-by- fieldfield-by-field basis. The amount of such loss is measured based on the difference between the discounted value of such net future cash flows and the carrying value of the asset. The Company recorded such an impairmentimpairments in 1998 and 1997 in the fourth quarteramounts of 1995 in$1,076,000 and $550,000, respectively. The impairments were the amountresult of $157,000. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 121, undiscounted future net revenues were compared annually to net capitalized cost of all oil and gas properties to determine if an impairment had occurred in the amount capitalized.certain fields depleting earlier than anticipated. Depreciation and depletion of producing oil and gas properties are provided under the unit-of-production method. Proved developed reserves are used to compute unit rates for unamortized tangible and intangible development costs, and proved reserves are used for unamortized leasehold costs. Estimated dismantlement, abandonment, and site restoration costs, net of salvage value, are considered in determining depreciation and depletion provisions. Gains and losses on disposals or retirements that are significant or include an entire depreciable or depletable property unit are included in income. All other dispositions, retirements, or abandonments are reflected in accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization. Cash and Cash Equivalents--Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposit accounts and temporary cash investments with maturities of ninety days or less at date of purchase. Marketable Equity Securities--In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, theSecurities--The Company has classified its investment in marketable equity securities as available for sale. Accordingly, unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of stockholders'other comprehensive income until realized. The Company sold its marketable equity until realized.securities in January 1999. 24 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) December 31, 1998 Investment in Pipeline Joint Venture--TheVenture--Prior to its sale in October 1997, the Company's investment consistsconsisted of a 20% interest in an intrastate natural gas pipeline joint venture. The Company's carrying basis in the investment was established at August 15, 1995 (fair value) and iswas being amortized on a basis which matchesmatched the amortization with the monthly maximum average contract quantities over the estimated remaining term of the joint venture, which is estimated to terminate in 2000.venture. Amortization amounted to $1,060,000$-0-, $741,000 and $403,000$1,060,000 for the years ended December 31, 19961998, 1997 and 1995, 27 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996, respectively. The Company recordsrecorded its equity in joint venture earnings as revenues in the statement of operations in the periods when the contract payments arewere earned. Income Taxes--The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsSFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes which requires income taxes be accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The federal income tax effect of La/Cal's activities (prior to August 15, 1995) is not reflected in the financial statements since such taxes were the responsibility of the individual partners of La/Cal. The Company became subject to income taxes as of August 15, 1995, as a result of the business combination. Earnings Per Share--As discussed previously, La/Cal's activities prior toShare--Basic income per Common share is computed by dividing net income available for common stockholders, for each reporting period by the business combination were conducted inweighted average number of Common shares outstanding during the formperiod. Diluted income per Common share is computed by dividing net income available for common stockholders for each reporting period by the weighted average number of a partnership andCommon shares outstanding during the Company was established in corporate form on August 15, 1995. Earnings per share information for 1995 and 1994 has been presented on a pro forma basis to reflect such information as if La/Cal had been operated as a corporation prior to August 15, 1995. The Company's Series A convertible preferred stock, stock options and common stock warrants are common stock equivalents, however, fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented, asperiod, plus the conversion or exerciseeffects of such instruments would be anti-dilutive.potentially dilutive Common shares. Stock Based Compensation--Prior to January 1, 1996, theCompensation--The Company accounted for its stock option plans in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. In the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company adopteduses SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which permits entities to recognize as expense over the vesting period the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively, SFAS No. 123 also allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share and other disclosures for employee stock options grants made in 1995 and future years as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. The Company has elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. Commitments and Contingencies--Liabilities for loss contingencies, including environmental remediation costs, arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties, and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries from third parties which are probable of realization are separately recorded, and are not offset against the related environmental liability. Use of Estimates--Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 2825 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 NOTE E--FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSE--Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 19961998 and 1995.1997.
DECEMBERDecember 31, 1996 DECEMBER1998 December 31, 19951997 ---------------------- ------------------- CARRYING CARRYING FAIR AMOUNT FAIR VALUE AMOUNT VALUE--------------------- Carrying Carrying Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value ----------- ---------- --------- ------------------- ---------- Financial asset-- Marketable equity securities......securities.... $ 569,700 569,700 759,600 759,600358,700 358,700 844,000 844,000 Financial liabilities-- Other liabilities................. 517,572 503,161 959,990 869,575liabilities............... 0 0 160,520 160,520 Long-term debt (including current maturities)...................... $10,000,000 10,000,000 9,750,000 9,750,000............ $29,500,000 29,500,000 18,500,000 18,500,000
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments: Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payables and accrued liabilities: The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Therefore, these instruments were not presented in the table above. Marketable equity securities: Fair value is based on bid prices published in financial media. Other liabilities and Long-termlong-term debt: The fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities by the Company's bankers. NOTE F--ACCRUED LIABILITIESF--Accrued Liabilities Accrued liabilities as of December 31, 19961998 and 19951997 consisted of the following:
1996 19951998 1997 ---------- --------- Current portion--consulting agreement contracts............Advanced billings.................................... $ 357,052 387,000 Advanced billings.......................................... 315,081 -- Environmental contingency.................................. 275,000 400,000532,543 607,905 Accrued interest........................................... 238,969 80,702 Liability to shareholders of acquired company.............. 177,585 195,695 Prior years' state income and franchise tax assessment..... 175,000 200,000 Taxes other than income.................................... 109,000 160,000 Other...................................................... 347,043 316,631interest..................................... 347,663 400,069 Other................................................ 933,487 1,700,381 ---------- --------- $1,994,730 1,740,028$1,813,693 2,708,355 ========== =========
NOTE G--LONG TERM DEBT Long-term debtG--Indebtedness Indebtedness at December 31, 19961998 and 19951997 consists of the following:
1996 1995 ----------- ---------1998 1997 ---------- ---------- Borrowings under credit facility, interest, at prime or LIBOR plus 2% (see below)(weighted (weighted average rate at December 31, 1996-- 7.7%1998--7.2%); principal due June 1, 1998.............................. $10,000,000 9,750,0002000... 29,500,000 18,500,000 Less current portion.....................................portion.................................... 29,500,000 -- -- ----------- ------------------- ---------- Long-term debt, excluding current portion................ $10,000,000 9,750,000 =========== =========portion............... $ -0- 18,500,000 ========== ==========
2926 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 At December 31, 1998, the Company was not in compliance with a restrictive covenant of its existing credit facility, and, accordingly, the entire principal amount outstanding is presented in current maturities of long-term debt. The Company has aamount outstanding under the credit facility as of December 31, 1998 was $29,500,000. On March 29, 1999 the Company signed a preliminary agreement with Compass Bank whichto restructure its existing credit facility. The preliminary credit agreement will allow the Company to be in compliance with all covenants upon execution of the agreement. The preliminary agreement provides for a total borrowing base determined by the bank every six monthsfacility of $20,500,000 with monthly reductions of $50,000 beginning on April 1, 1999 and May 1, 1999, $200,000 on June 1, 1999, and $300,000 on July 1, 1999 and each month thereafter. Semi-annual borrowing base determinations will be made beginning July 1, 1999 based in part on the Company's oil and gas reserve information. Such borrowing base is currently $12,300,000. The maturity date for all amounts drawn under the bank creditBorrowing Base facility is JuneFebruary 1, 1998.2001. Interest on such facility is based on either of two methods at the option of the Company: the bank's prime lending rate or LIBOR plus 2%. Interest and rates are set on specific draws for one, two, three or six month periods also at the option of the Company. The creditpreliminary agreement also establishes a Tranche A facility in the amount of $9,000,000. The maturity date for the Tranche A facility is December 1, 1999. The Tranche A requires that excess cash flow from operations, as defined in the agreement, be applied to outstanding principal and interest until the maturity date, with interest based on the Compass Bank Index Rate plus 2%. The preliminary agreement requires the Companynet proceeds of asset sales be used to maintain minimum net worthextinguish outstanding principal and interest under the borrowing base facility and Tranche A. Additionally, under the terms of $8,500,000 plus 50% of net income, as defined, subsequent to September 30, 1995. Under such restriction,the preliminary agreement, the Company had $1,766 availablemay not make any distributions or pay dividends, including dividends on any class of its preferred stock, until Tranche A is paid in full. Additionally, budgeted capital expenditures are required to be approved by the Lender prior to closing, and such approval shall be effective for a period of six months or until such time as an increase is requested. Furthermore, provided actual capital expenditures do not exceed the paymentapproved budgeted amount, the determination of dividendscapital expenditures is at the sole discretion of the Company. The preliminary agreement also requires that the Company's vendor accounts payable balance shall not exceed $2,500,000 as of June 30, 1999. The Company's vendor accounts payable balance was $3,721,000 at December 31, 1996.1998. The preliminary agreement is subject to definitive documentation and Lender credit facility also requires a minimum debt service ratio of 1.25 to 1. The amount outstanding under the credit facility as of December 31, 1996 was $10,000,000. As described in Note S, the borrowing base and minimum net worth requirements were revised as a result of the January 31, 1997 acquisition to $22,500,000 and $14,500,000 plus net income, as defined, subsequent to December 31, 1996, respectively.approval. Substantially all of the Company's assets are pledged to secure this credit facility. Interest paid during 1996, 1995,1998, 1997 and 19941996 amounted to $562,593, $968,190$1,904,809, $1,038,221 and $1,051,927$562,593, respectively. NOTE H--STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYH--Stockholders' Equity Common Stock--AtStock--On March 12, 1998 the Company effected a one for eight reverse stock split of its common stock. All share and per share amounts of all periods presented have been adjusted to retroactively give effect to the reverse stock split. At December 31, 1996,1998 unissued shares of Goodrich common stock were reserved in the amount of 2,667,8261,167,717 shares for the conversion of convertible preferred stock 2,841,534and 342,692 shares for stock option plans and 800,000 shares for the exercise of warrants. Preferred Stock--In accordance with the terms of the combination transactions, all of the outstanding shares of Patrick's Series B Convertibleplans. Preferred Stock were converted into GoodrichThe Series A Convertible Preferred Stock except for 76,290 shares for which appraisal rights had been preserved. The Preferred Stock has a par value of $1.00 per share with a liquidation preference of $10.00 per share, and is convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless earlier redeemed, into shares of Common Stock of the Company at an initial conversion rate of 3.33.417 shares of Common stock per share of Series A Preferred. The Series A Preferred Stock also will automatically convert to Common Stock if the closing price for the Series A Preferred Stock exceeds $15.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days. Upon any conversion of a share of Preferred Stock prior to the close of business on September 15, 1997, the stockholder will receive one Common Stock purchase warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock at $5.00 per share, subject to adjustment in certain events. Any outstanding warrants can be called on thirty days notice for $4.25 per warrant and will expire on September 15, 1997. The Series A Preferred Stock is redeemable in whole or in part, at $12.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock accrue at an annual rate of 8%. As a result of the combination transactions, the Company was required to offer a special conversion right to all holders of the Preferred Stock for a period of 61 days beginning August 18, 1995. On October 18, 1995, holders of 363,851 shares of the Company's preferred stock elected to convert their shares to Common Stock at an exchange rate of 6.25 to 1. This conversion resulted in the Company issuing an additional 2,274,058 shares of Common Stock and resulted in 734,859 preferred shares outstanding as of December 31, 1995. Effective January 1, 1996, the preferred shares under appraisal rights were reinstated, resulting in outstanding shares of 811,149. Outstanding shares as of December 31, 1996 were 801,149. 30are cumulative. 27 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 1996 Warrants--In conjunction1998 The Company issued 750,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with 10.75% subordinated collateralized notes soldits acquisition of the La/Cal II properties on May 10, 1990, by Patrick,January 31, 1997. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has a par value of $1.00 per share with a liquidation preference of $10.00 per share and rank junior to the Series A Preferred Stock. The shares of Series B Preferred Stock are convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless earlier redeemed, into shares of Common Stock of the Company has outstanding warrants to acquire 800,000at the conversion rate of 1.12 shares of the Company's $.20 per value Common Stock at exercise prices from $3.00 to $6.16 per share of Series B Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock are not redeemable by the Company prior to three institutional investors. These warrants expireJanuary 31, 2001, and subsequently, are redeemable at $10.00 per share. Dividends on May 10, 1997.the Series B Preferred Stock accrue at an annual rate of 8.25% and are cumulative. Stock Option and Incentive Programs--Goodrich currently has two plans which provide for stock option and other incentive awards for the Company's key employees, and consultants and its directors. The Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan allows the Board of Directors through its Compensation Committee, to grant stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, long-term incentive awards and phantom stock awards, or any combination thereof to key employees and consultants. The Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1995 Nonemployee1997 Director Stock OptionCompensation Plan provides for the grant of stock and options to each director who is not and has never been an employee of the Company. Additionally, Goodrich assumed certain outstanding stock options of Patrick as a result of the business combination.combination in 1995. The Goodrich Petroleum plans authorize grants of options to purchase up to a combined total of 3,500,000437,500 shares of authorized but unissued common stock. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the stock's fair market value at the date of grant and all stock options granted under the 1995 Stock Option Plan generally have ten year terms and five year pro rata vesting. The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $2.17, $2.57 and 1995 was $ .382 and $ .485$3.06 on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 1996--expected1998--expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 7.5%, and an expected life of 6 years; 1995--expected1997--expected dividend yield 0%, risk- free interest rate of 7.5%, and an expected life of 6 years; 1996--expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 7.5%, and an expected life of 6 years; expected volatility of stock over expected life of the options--35%. The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its Planplans and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in the financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income (loss) would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
1998 1997 1996 1995----------- ---------- -------- ------- Net income..............income (loss).............. As reported $381,445 654,405$(7,715,342) (1,388,964) 381,445 Pro forma (7,715,342) (1,452,644) 225,135 464,885 Earnings (loss) applicable to common stock.................. As reported (8,970,980) (2,594,174) (263,355) 399,473 Pro forma (8,970,980) (8,970,980) (419,665) 209,953 EarningsBasic and diluted earnings (loss) per average common share...share......................... As reported (.01) *(1.71) (.50) (.05) Pro forma $ (.01) *(1.71) (.51) (.08)
Pro forma net incomeEarnings Per Share--Both series of the Company's convertible preferred stock and its stock options are considered to be potential common stock but have not been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share reflect only options granted in 1996 and 1995. Therefore, the full impact of calculating compensation costsbecause to do so would have been antidillutive for stock options under SFAS No. 123 is not reflected in the pro forma net income amounts presented above because compensation costs are reflected over the options' vesting period of approximately 5 years and compensation for options granted prior to January 1, 1995 is not considered. - -------- * Not calculated due to entity not being in corporate form during a portion of 1995. 31all periods presented. 28 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 Stock option transactions during 19961998, 1997 and 19951996 were as follows:
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE AVERAGE RANGE OF REMAINING NUMBER OF EXERCISE EXERCISE CONTRACTUAL OPTIONS PRICE PRICE LIFEWeighted Average Remaining Number of Weighted Average Range of Contractual Options Exercise Price Exercise Price Life ---------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------- Patrick Patrick Patrick Patrick Total Only Total Only Total Only Total Only ------- ------- -------- ----------------- --------- -------- --------- ------------------- Outstanding January 1, 1995.......... -- -- -- -- Assumed from Patrick............... 1,670,602 $2.321996................... 333,200 196,950 14.24 18.56 Granted--1995 Stock Option Plan.... 880,000 1.02Plan........... 49,375 -- 6.08 -- Granted--1995 NonNon- Employee Director Stock Option Plan................. 220,000 0.97Plan..... 11,250 -- 7.52 -- Expiration of Options.............. (95,000) 2.25 ---------Options.. (39,883) (39,883) 18.00 18.00 ------- ------- Outstanding December 31, 1995........ 2,675,602 1.78 $.97-3.00 5.5 years1996 353,942 157,067 12.48 18.70 $6.00 to $16.00 to 5.4 yrs. 2.0 yrs. $24.00 $24.00 Granted--1995 Stock Option Plan.... 395,000 .76Plan........... 67,500 -- 6.48 -- Granted--1995 Non-EmployeeNon- Employee Director Stock Option Plan................. 90,000 .94Plan..... 6,250 -- 5.52 -- Expiration of Options.............. (319,068) 2.25 ---------Options.. (86,250) (86,250) 18.80 18.78 ------- ------- Outstanding December 31, 1996........ 2,841,534 1.56 $.75-3.00 5.9 years =========1997 341,442 70,817 9.60 18.60 $5.50 to $16.00 to 7.4 yrs. 4.2 yrs. ======= ======= $24.00 $24.00 Granted--1995 Stock Option Plan........... 144,000 -- 5.98 -- Granted--1998 Non- Employee Director Stock Option Plan..... 10,000 -- 5.98 -- Expiration of Options.. (62,190) (5,625) 7.88 19.33 ------- ------- Outstanding December 31, 1998 433,252 65,192 $5.50 to $16.00 to 7.0 yrs. 3.4 yrs. ======= ======= $24.00 $24.00 Exercisable December 31, 1994........ -- --1996................... 219,129 157,067 15.63 18.70 Exercisable December 31, 1995........ 1,795,602 2.151997................... 172,317 70,817 $ 12.13 18.60 Exercisable December 31, 1996........ 1,755,034 $1.951998................... 208,379 65,192 $ 10.86 18.54
At the February 25, 1999 meeting, the Board of Directors approved a stock option surrender/regrant program whereby employees and directors of the Company could surrender their present options and be regranted options equal to 75% of their previous number of options. Vesting periods for the new options began with the regrant date and the options have an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the date of declaration by the Board of Directors. NOTE I--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESI--Commitments and Contingencies The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has identified the Company as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") for the cost of clean-up of "hazardous substances" at an oil field waste disposal site in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. The Company has estimated that the remaining cost of long- term clean-up of the site will be approximately $3.5 million with the Company's percentage of responsibility to be approximately 3.05%. As of December 31, 1996,1998, the Company has paid approximately $135,000$321,000 in costs related to this matter and has $275,000$92,000 accrued for the remaining liability. These costs have not been discounted to their present value. The EPA and the PRPs will continue to evaluate the site and revise estimates for the long-term clean-up of the site. There can be no assurance that the cost of clean-up and the Company's percentage responsibility will not be higher than currently estimated. In addition, under the federal environmental laws, the liability costs for the 29 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) December 31, 1998 clean-up of the site is joint and several among all PRPs. Therefore, the ultimate cost of the clean-up to the Company could be significantly higher than the amount presently estimated or accrued for this liability. Additionally, the Company is party to a number of lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The Company has defended and intends to continue to defend these actions vigorously and believes, based on currently available information, that adverse results or settlements, if any, in excess of insurance coverage or amounts already provided, will not be material to its financial position, liquidity or results of operations. 32 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996 NOTE J--INCOME TAXESJ--Income Taxes Income tax expense for the yearyears ending December 31, 19961998, 1997 and the period from August 15, 19951996 through December 31, 19951996 consists of:
CURRENT DEFERRED TOTALCurrent Deferred Total ------- -------- ----- Year ended December 31, 1998: U.S. Federal.................................... $ -- -- -- State........................................... -- -- -- ------- ------- --- -- -- -- ======= ======= === Year Ended December 31, 1997: U.S. Federal.................................... $14,643 (14,643) -- State........................................... -- -- -- ------- ------- --- 14,643 (14,643) -- ======= ======= === Year Ended December 31, 1996: U.S. Federal..................................Federal.................................... $ -- -- -- State.........................................State........................................... -- -- -- ------------- ------- --- -- -- -- ====== ======= === Period from August 15, 1995 through December 31, 1995: U.S. Federal.................................. 25,000 (25,000) -- State......................................... -- -- -- ------ ------- --- 25,000 (25,000) -- ====== ======= ===
Following is a reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective rate on lossincome (loss) before income taxes for the yearyears ended December 31, 19961998, 1997 and the period from August 15, 1995 through December 31, 1995:1996:
1998 1997 1996 1995 ----- ----- ----- U.S. Statutory Income Tax Rate........................... 35.0 Rate......................... (35.0)% (35.0)% 35.0% Increase in deductible temporary differences for which no benefit recorded........................................recorded................................... 34.6 34.9 -- 28.2 Change in the beginning of the year balance of the valuation allowance allocated to income tax income expense.................................................expense............................................... -- -- (35.5) -- Nondeductible expenses...................................expenses................................. .4 .1 .5 6.8----- ----- ----- -- -- -- ===== ===== =====
The significant components of deferred income tax expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 19961998, 1997 and the period from August 15, 1995 through December 31, 19951996 are as follows:
1998 1997 1996 1995 ------- ------------ ---------- ---- Deferred tax benefit (exclusive of utilization of net operating loss carryforwards).................................................. -- 657,938(1,023,016) -- Utilization of net operating loss carryforward........carryforward.......... -- 632,938 ------- --------1,008,373 -- $(25,000) ======= ========--- ---------- --- $-- (14,643) -- === ========== ===
3330 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 19961998 and 19951997 are presented below.
DECEMBERDecember 31, DECEMBERDecember 31, 1996 19951998 1998 ------------ ------------ Deferred tax assets: Differences between book and tax basis of: Property and equipment........................... $ 31,026 307,025 Marketable equity securities..................... 206,621 140,156securities................ $ 280,471 96,616 Contingent liabilities........................... 229,044 254,962liabilities...................... 158,873 198,469 Consulting agreement contracts................... 181,150 335,997 Other............................................ 59,949 70,306contracts.............. -- 56,182 Other....................................... 65,199 65,199 Operating loss carryforwards....................... 13,523,211 12,364,772carryforwards.................. 13,109,624 11,742,835 Statutory depletion carryforward................... 5,376,361 4,943,209carryforward.............. 5,657,865 5,615,003 AMT Tax credit carryforward........................ 1,446,226 1,392,176carryforward................... 1,477,872 1,460,869 Investment tax credit carryforward................. 747,378 1,242,725carryforward............ 98,574 189,336 ------------ ------------ Total gross deferred tax assets.................... 21,800,966 21,051,328assets............... 20,848,478 19,424,509 Less valuation allowance........................... (20,729,196) (19,461,294)allowance...................... (19,104,959) (16,884,247) ------------ ------------ Net deferred tax assets............................ 1,071,770 1,590,034assets....................... 1,743,519 2,540,262 ------------ ------------ Deferred tax liability: Differences between book and tax basis of investment in Pecos pipeline...................... (1,046,770) (1,565,034)of: Property and equipment...................... (1,703,876) (2,500,619) ------------ ------------ Total gross deferred liability..................... (1,046,770) (1,565,034)liability................ (1,703,876) (2,500,619) ------------ ------------ Net deferred tax asset.............................asset........................ $ 25,000 25,00039,643 39,643 ============ ============
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased $1,267,902$2,221,000 for the year ended December 31, 19961998 and $658,000decreased $3,845,000 for the period from August 15, 1995 throughyear ended December 31, 1995, which, in both years, substantially offset the change in certain deferred tax assets.1997. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based primarily upon the level of projections for future taxable income generated primarily by the reversal of future taxable temporary differences over the periods which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance at December 31, 1996.1998. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced. 3431 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 The following table summarizes the amounts and expiration dates of operating loss and investment tax credit carryforwards:
Investment tax credit Operating loss carryforwards carryforwards ---------------------------- --------------------- Amount Expires Amount Expires ------ ------- ------- ------- OPERATING LOSS CARRYFORWARDS INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT CARRYFORWARDS -------------------------------- --------------------------------------- AMOUNT EXPIRES AMOUNT EXPIRES ---------------- ------------ ------------------ ------- $ 8,632,645 2003 $ 558,042 1998 4,331,292 2004 22,591 1999 1,080,772973,053 2005 68,171 2000$96,466 2001 7,093,823 2006 96,466 20012,108 2002 8,860,622 2007 2,108 2002 4,285,746 2008 3,224,9393,247,494 2009 1,127,9065,480,870 2010 600,706 2011 ---------------- ------------------ $ 38,637,745 $ 747,378 ================ ==================1,926,031 2012 5,075,182 2018 ----------- ------- $37,543,527 $98,574 =========== =======
As a result of the August 15, 1995 business combination, the Company's annual utilization of its net operating and statutory depletion carryforwards generated prior to the business combination are limited under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Such limitation is determined annually and is comprised of a base amount of $1,682,797 plus any recognized "built in gains" existing at August 15, 1995. Such limitation amounted to $9,100,000$13,056,000 in 19951997 and is estimated to be $8,800,000$19,727,000 in 1996.1998. The Company's statutory depletion carryforwards and AMT credit carryovers have no expiration date. As described in Note D, no provision for income taxes for La/Cal was included in the statements of operations prior to August 15, 1995 due to the tax effect of Partnership activities being the responsibility of the individual Partners. The Company paid income taxes of $4,344, $0 and $107,237 in 1998, 1997 and $0 in 1996, and 1995, respectively. NOTE K--PATRICK PETROLEUM EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Patrick maintained several employee benefit plans prior to the business combination. In accordance with the business combination, each of these plans has been or is in the process of being terminated. Accordingly, the only activities of these plans subsequent to August 15, 1995 were related to their termination. At December 31, 1996, the Patrick Petroleum Corporation of Michigan Defined Benefit Plan and Trust held assets of approximately $1,700,000. The Plan is fully funded and these assets are expected to be distributed to the participants during February 1997. NOTE L--RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS. La/Cal did not have any employees and was dependent on Goodrich Oil Company to provide substantially all management of oil and gas operations and administrative functions. La/Cal was not required to pay Goodrich Oil Company for such services. Goodrich Oil Company was the operator of record of the majority of the oil and gas properties in which La/Cal had an interest and owned joint interests in such properties.K--Related Party Transactions. The Company entered into additional transactions with Goodrich Oil Company subsequent to the business combination as more fully described below. Goodrich Oil Company is owned by Henry Goodrich who is the 35 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996 chairman of the Company and the father of Walter G. Goodrich, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. Goodrich Oil Company continues to be the operator of record of certain oilDuring 1998, 1997 and gas properties in which the Company has an interest and Goodrich Oil Company owns joint interests in such properties. The Company is a party to a Joint Participation Agreement with Goodrich Oil Company pursuant to which the Company and Goodrich Oil Company agree to offer to the other a 50% participation interest in such company's share of all drilling prospects and acquisitions of producing properties. During 1996, and 1995, the Company paid Goodrich Oil Company $0, and $222,530 for the repayment of advances for business combination expenses$74,981 and $118,775 and $50,132 for certain general and administrative expenses. Amounts receivable from Goodrich Oil CompanyThere were $0 and $3,947 andno amounts payable to Goodrich Oil Company were $19,783 and $12,726 at December 31, 19961998 and 1995.1997. Goodrich Oil Company ceased to exist as an operating company in May 1997. The Company paid $150,000$180,000, $167,500 and $58,250$150,000 to the Company's Chairman, Mr. Henry Goodrich during 19961998, 1997 and 1995,1996, respectively, under a consulting agreement which expires in August 2000. In connection with the business combination, Mr. Leo E. Bromberg, a partnerNOTE L--Natural Gas and memberCrude Oil Cost Data and Results of the management committee of La/Cal, received a finder's fee paid in the form of 494,131 shares of the Company's common stock. Such shares were included in the 19,765,226 shares of the Company's common stock received by the La/Cal Partners in connection with the transactions. NOTE M--NATURAL GAS AND CRUDE OIL COST DATA AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSOperations. The following reflects the Company's capitalized costs related to natural gas and oil activities at December 31, 19961998 and 1995:1997:
1996 1995 -----------1998 1997 ------------ ---------- Proved properties.................................. $17,908,303 15,271,879properties................................ $ 49,916,276 39,343,362 Unproved properties................................ 1,221,209 990,154 -----------properties.............................. 3,412,897 1,811,325 ------------ ---------- 19,129,512 16,262,03353,329,173 41,154,687 Less accumulated depreciation and depletion........ 4,885,687 2,209,924 -----------depletion...... 13,592,827 8,798,501 ------------ ---------- Net property and equipment....................... $14,243,825 14,052,109 ===========equipment..................... $ 39,736,346 32,356,186 ============ ==========
32 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) December 31, 1998 The following table reflects certain data with respect to natural gas and oil property acquisitions, exploration and development activities:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 --------------------- ---------- --------- Property acquisition costs Proved..............................Proved $ 129,325 17,308,540(a) 7,068 10,680,422(a) 2,112,308 Unproved.............................Unproved............................ 2,446,474 886,647 231,053 274,329 -- Exploration costs...................... 3,395,178 21,964 4,240 Development costs......................Exploration........................... 8,718,682 5,535,783 3,866,205 Development........................... 8,169,741 3,598,177 359,075 353,311 1,600,235----------- ---------- --------- $19,464,222 27,329,147 4,463,401 =========== ========== =========
- - -------- (a) PropertiesIncludes properties acquired from Patrick. 36 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996in the La/Cal II Acquisition including portions funded with Serial B Preferred Stock ($7,500,000) Results of operations for natural gas and oil producing activities follow:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 ---------- --------------------- ----------- --------- Sales to unaffiliated customers................ $7,687,748 5,477,208 4,995,663customers............ $ 9,836,863 11,351,586 7,687,748 Production costs (lease operating expense and taxes)........................................................................ 2,821,515 2,316,006 1,614,584 1,029,501 684,131 Exploration expenses...........................expenses....................... 6,010,425 3,205,730 1,149,240 193,159 4,240 Impairment of oil and gas properties........... -- 157,000properties....... 1,075,853 549,792 -- Depreciation, depletion and amortization.......amortization... 4,038,547 4,065,998 2,684,494 1,356,060 1,138,635 ---------- --------------------- ----------- --------- 13,946,340 10,137,526 5,448,318 2,735,720 1,827,006 ---------- --------------------- ----------- --------- Results of operations (before pro forma income taxes in 1995 and 1994)....................... $2,239,430 2,741,488 3,168,657 ========== Pro forma income taxes (Unaudited)............. 970,703 1,235,776 ---------- --------- Pro forma results of operations (Unaudited).... $1,770,785 1,932,881 ==========operations...................... $(4,109,477) 1,214,060 2,239,430 =========== =========== =========
La/Cal operated as a partnership since its formation to the date of the business combination (August 15, 1995) and, accordingly, did not directly pay income taxes. Pro forma income tax expense and the results of oil and gas operations as adjusted for pro forma income taxes are reflected above for that period in order to reflect the impact of income taxes as if La/Cal had been organized as a corporation. No income taxes have been reflected above for the Company for the periods subsequent to the August 15, 1995, business combination due to its estimate that net operating loss and statutory depletion loss carryforwards will be utilized to offset future taxable income. NOTE N--CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERSM--Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers Due to the nature of the industry the Company sells its oil and natural gas production to a limited number of purchasers and, accordingly, amounts receivable from such purchasers could be significant. Additionally, prior to the Company receivessale of the Company's interest in its pipeline joint venture in 1997, it received net monthly payments from its partner, Mitchell Marketing Company, in its pipeline joint venture.Company. Revenues from these sources as a percent of total revenues for the periods presented were as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, ---------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 ---- ---- ---- Tenneco Gas Marketing Company.............................. -- -- 41% Seaber Corporation of Louisiana............................ 47% 44% 35% 55% 48%Texaco..................................................... 12% 11% -- Navajo Refining Company.................................... 11% -- -- Mobil Oil Corporation...................................... -- 10% 22% 16% -- Mitchell Marketing Company................................. 16%-- 9% --16%
3733 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 NOTE O--PATRICK ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ACQUIREDN--Sales of Assets On August 15, 1995,January 5, 1999 the Company recorded the combination transactions which effect was primarily the recording of the assets and liabilities of Patrick at their fair value. Such amounts were as follows: Cash overdraft............................................. $ (451,414) Marketable equity securities............................... 759,600 Accounts receivable........................................ 676,040 Prepaid expenses and other current assets.................. 12,745 Investment in Penske Corporation........................... 9,600,000 Investment in pipeline joint venture....................... 5,079,754 Property and equipment..................................... 10,780,422 Accounts payable........................................... (27,627) Accrued liabilities........................................ (1,438,070) Long term debt............................................. (10,626,118) Other liabilities.......................................... (703,000) ------------ $ 13,662,332 ============
The former common shareholders of Patrick received 19,765,226 shares of the Company's common stock and the former preferred shareholders of Patrick effectively received 1,175,000 shares of the Company's preferred stock in the business combination. As reflected in the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity, the issuance of such shares resulted in an increase in stockholders' equity of $12,573,900. NOTE P--SALE OF INVESTMENT IN PENSKE CORPORATION On September 18, 1995, the Company received $9,600,000 cash as redemption ofsold its investment in the Penske Corporation. The proceeds were used to pay down the Company's long term debt along with related accrued interest. No gain or loss resultedmarketable equity securities. Proceeds from the transaction. NOTE Q--EXTRAORDINARY ITEM-EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT La/Cal's General Obligation Notes were paid offsale amounted to $240,000 and resulted in connection witha realized loss of $520,000. On April 22, 1998 the business combination and the related unamortized debt financing costsCompany sold its interest in the amount of $482,906 were charged to operations as an extraordinary item, in the third quarter of 1995. NOTE R--PRO FORMA FINANCIAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) Selected results of operations on a pro forma basis as if the combination transactions had occurred on January 1, 1995 and January 1, 1994, respectively, are as follows:
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 1995 1994 ----------- ----------- Revenues.......................................... $11,588,318 $15,836,988 Income before extraordinary item.................. 2,510,494 3,780,094 Net income........................................ 2,027,588 3,780,094 Income applicable to common stock................. 1,377,588 2,840,094 Income before extraordinary item per average common share..................................... .04 .07 Income per average common share................... $ .03 $ .07
38 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996 The pro forma operations for the year ended December 31, 1995 contain a net gain on the sale of an investment which accounted for $1,563,762 of net income and $.04 income per share. The operations information for the year ended December 31, 1994 contains a net gain on sale of investments which accounted for $6,447,102 of net income and $ .16 income per share. Also the operations for the year ended December 31, 1994 has been adjusted to eliminate operations related to certain oil and gas properties located in Texas for $49,000 resulting in a gain of $4,000. On October 16, 1997, the Company sold by Patrickits 20% interest in December, 1994a natural gas pipeline joint venture. The adjusted sales price was $3,564,000 and the Company recognized a gain on the sale (both pre-tax and after-tax) in order to present comparable amounts.the fourth quarter of 1997 of $688,304. The Company sold its interests in certain oil and gas properties located in Montana for $370,000 in 1997, resulting in a gain of $18. The Company sold its interest in certain oil and gas properties located in North Dakota for $325,000 in 1996, resulting in a gain of $88,000. NOTE S--SUBSEQUENT EVENT (UNAUDITED)O--Acquisition of Oil Gas Properties On January 31, 1997, the Company acquired the oil and gas properties of La/Cal Energy Partners II ("La/Cal II") and certain working interest owners for a purchase price of $16.5 million ("La/Cal II Acquisition"). The purchase price was comprised of $1.5 million cash, the assumption of $7.5 million La/Cal II long-term debt and the issuance of 750,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock of the Company ("Series B Preferred Stock") with an aggregate liquidation value of $7.5 million. In connection with the La/Cal II Acquisition, the Company increased its borrowing base to $22.5 million and borrowed an additional $9 million to payoff La/Cal II's debt and to pay the cash portion of the purchase price. The Series B Preferred Stock rate of 8.25% per annum and each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into 8.92 shares of common stock. Such shares are redeemable by the Company after January 31, 2001 at $10.00 per share. Selected results of operations on a pro forma basis as if the La/Cal II Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 1997 and January 1, 1996, respectively are as follows:
For the year ended December 31, ---------------------- 1997 1996 ---------- ---------- (Unaudited Revenues..................................................... $14,370,000 Revenues.......................................... 13,422,000 14,370,000 Net Income...................................................income (loss)................................. (1,154,000) 1,715,000 Earnings (loss) applicable to common stock..........................stock........ (2,411,000) 451,000 EarningsBasic and diluted earnings (loss) per average common share............................ $ .01share..................................... (.46) .09
NOTE T--SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS RESERVE INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)P--Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited) The supplemental oil and gas reserve information that follows is presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsSFAS No. 69, ("SFAS No. 69"), Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities. The schedules provide users with a common base for preparing estimates of future cash flows and comparing reserves among companies. Additional background information follows concerning the schedules. The supplemental oil and gas reserve information that follows relates to properties owned by La/Cal subsequent to formation but prior to the business combination with Patrick (year ended December 31, 1994 and period form January 1, 1995 through August 14, 1995) and properties of the combined entities subsequent to the business combination with Patrick (period from August 15, 1995 through December 31, 1995 and year ended December 31, 1996). Additionally, certain pro forma reserve information is presented as of December 31, 1996 as if the acquisition described in Note S had been completed as of December 31, 1996. All of the subject reserves are located in the continental United States. Schedules 1 and 2--Estimated Net Proved Oil and Gas Reserves TheSubstantially all of the Company's reserve information related to crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids and natural gas was compiled based on evaluations performed by two (but primarily Coutret and Associates, Inc.) engineering firms and All of the Company internally forsubject reserves are located in the year ended December 31, 1996, by several engineering firms and the Company internally for the year ended December 31, 1995, and by Coutret and Associates, Inc., and H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1994. 39continental United States. 34 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER(Continued) December 31, 19961998 Many assumptions and judgmental decisions are required to estimate reserves. Quantities reported are considered reasonable but they are subject to future revisions, some of which may be substantial, as additional information becomes available. Such additional knowledge may be gained as the result of reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price changes, and other factors. Regulations published by the Securities and Exchange Commission define proved reserves as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those volumes expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are those volumes expected to be recovered as a result of making additional investment by drilling new wells on acreage offsetting productive units or recompleting existing wells. Schedule 3--Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves SFAS No. 69 requires calculation of future net cash flows using a ten percent annual discount factor and year end prices, costs, and statutory tax rates, except for known future changes such as contracted prices and legislated tax rates. The calculated value of proved reserves is not necessarily indicative of either fair market value or present value of future cash flows because prices, costs, and governmental policies do not remain static; appropriate discount rates may vary; and extensive judgment is required to estimate the timing of production. Other logical assumptions would likely have resulted in significantly different amounts. Average crude oil prices received for oil and the average price received by well for natural gas, effective at the end of each year, were used for this calculation, and were $9.37 per bbl and $2.24 per Mcf, respectively as of December 31, 1998, and $16.50 per Bbl and $2.59 per Mcf, respectively as of December 31, 1997, and $23.88 per Bbl and $4.17 per Mcf, respectively as of December 31, 1996, and $17.90 per Bbl and $2.01 per Mcf, respectively as of December 31, 1995. On a pro forma basis as of December 31, 1996 such average1996. Oil prices were $4.07 per Mcf and $23.53 per Bbl. Oil andhave subsequently increased while gas prices have subsequently declined from December 31, 19961998 levels. No income tax effect has been provided in the amounts below as of December 31, 1994 due to the fact La/Cal was a partnership with all income taxes being the responsibility of the partners themselves. Schedule 3 also presents a summary of the principal reasons for change in the standard measure of discounted future net cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. 401998. 35 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996 SCHEDULE 1--ESTIMATED NET PROVED GAS RESERVES (MCF)Schedule 1--Estimated Net Proved Gas Reserves (Mcf)
HISTORICAL PRO FORMAYear Ended December 31, ---------------------------------- ---------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Proved: Balance, beginning of period.period............. 37,570,614 18,184,738 18,887,189 21,983,004 17,550,038 Revisions of previous estimates................... (3,995,021) (5,727,528) (702,870)estimates.......... (8,393,772) (1,582,986) (3,989,734) Purchase of minerals in place.......................place............ 226,778 3,761,481 3,594 5,324,607 4,380,429 Extensions, discoveries, and other additions.............additions............................... 1,656,200 19,707,712 4,961,754 375,800 3,141,537 Production................... (1,618,090) (2,213,923) (2,386,130)Production............................... (2,782,825) (2,449,320) (1,623,377) Sales of minerals in place...place............... (132,685) (51,011) (54,688) (854,771) -- ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance, end of period.......period................... 28,144,310 37,570,614 18,184,738 18,887,189 21,983,004 21,495,027 ========== ========== ========== Proved developed: Beginning of period..........period...................... 16,600,669 13,911,003 13,815,905 18,839,882 13,729,911 End of period................ 13,911,003 13,815,905 18,839,882 16,785,503 SCHEDULE 2--ESTIMATED NET PROVED OIL RESERVES (BARRELS)period............................ 21,481,946 16,600,669 13,911,003
Schedule 2--Estimated Net Proved Oil Reserves (Barrels)
HISTORICAL PRO FORMA ---------------------------------- ---------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- --------- --------- Proved: Balance, beginning of period.period................ 4,098,390 1,050,210 940,147 523,722 209,941 Revisions of previous estimates................... 44,689 (236,934) (23,246)estimates............. (988,611) 132,327 44,980 Purchase of minerals in place.......................place............... 0 1,614,779 -- 938,465 47,482 Extensions, discoveries, and other additions.............additions.................................. 299,799 1,685,438 278,129 3,389 326,033 Production................... (165,673) (102,731) (36,488)Production.................................. (316,768) (282,380) (165,964) Sale of minerals in place....place................... 0 (101,984) (47,082) (185,764) -- ---------- ---------- ------------------- --------- --------- Balance, end of period.......period...................... 3,092,810 4,098,390 1,050,210 940,147 523,722 2,652,114 ========== ========== =================== ========= ========= Proved, developed: Beginning of period..........period......................... 2,292,626 969,868 920,557 504,908 174,641 End of period................ 969,868 920,557 504,908 2,158,609 SCHEDULE 3-- STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS RELATED TO PROVED OIL AND GAS RESERVESperiod............................... 2,266,854 2,292,626 969,868
Schedule 3--Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
HISTORICAL PRO FORMA ---------------------------------- ---------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS)-------- ------- ------- (in thousands) Future cash inflows............ $inflows............................... 86,449 155,542 96,668 51,615 44,878 142,112 Future production and development costs............. (11,031) (8,267) (3,803) (16,391)costs........... (24,339) (26,906) (11,303) Future income tax expense......expense(a)...................... --0-- (24,177) (13,624) (4,150) -- (20,462) ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ ------- ------- Future net cash flows..........flows............................. 62,110 104,459 72,013 39,198 41,075 105,259 10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows.........................flows............................................ (21,475) (40,456) (24,656) (12,316) (13,559) (36,997) ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ ------- ------- Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.........................flows............................................ $ 40,635 64,003 47,357 26,882 27,516 68,262 ========== ========== ========== ================== ======= ======= Average year end prices: Natural gas (per Mcf)........................... $ 2.24 2.59 4.17 Crude oil (per Bbl)............................. $ 9.37 16.50 23.88
41- - -------- (a) Taxable income for 1998 period was entirely offset by available net operating loss carry forwards. 36 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1996 The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted net cash flows for the years shown:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, ------------------------------------------------ 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994-------- ------- ------ ------ (IN THOUSANDS)(in thousands) Net changes in prices and production costs related to future production.................................... $24,061 829 (2,978)production.............................. $(31,820) (32,327) 24,061 Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs.....................................costs.................................. (7,015) (9,036) (6,073) (4,448) (4,312) Net change due to revisions in quantity estimates.....estimates.. (12,464) (991) (8,730) (8,848) (921) Net change due to extensions, discoveries and improved recovery.............................................recovery................................. 3,006 37,465 15,532 521 5,583 Net change due to purchase and sales of minerals-in- place................................................minerals- in-place.......................................... 82 16,065 (792) 11,090 5,105 Development costs incurred during the period..........period....... 2,198 3,598 359 -- 1,600 Net change in income taxes............................taxes......................... 14,093 (4,094) (6,524) (3,475) -- Accretion of discount.................................discount.............................. 7,810 5,736 3,036 2,752 2,143 Change in production rates (timing) and other.........other...... 742 230 (394) 945 (137)-------- ------- ------ ------ $20,475 (634) 6,083$(23,368) 16,646 20,475 ======== ======= ====== ======
4237 GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY INCOME INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)Consolidated Quarterly Income Information (Unaudited)
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH 1996 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER TOTAL ----First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total ---------- --------- --------- --------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Revenues................ $2,650,788 2,162,719 2,193,449 2,850,855 9,857,8111998 Revenues.............. $2,433,577 2,264,397 2,697,743 3,196,156 10,591,873 Costs and Expenses...... 2,374,423 2,445,198 2,082,413 2,574,332 9,476,366Expenses.... 3,446,298 5,215,164 4,813,328 4,836,631 18,311,421 Gain on sale of assets............... 4,206 -- -- -- 4,206 Net income (loss)....... 276,365 (282,479) 111,036 276,523 381,445..... (1,008,515) (2,950,767) (2,115,585) (1,640,475) (7,715,342) Preferred stock dividends.............. 162,230 162,190 160,190 160,190 644,800 Incomedividends............ 313,912 313,902 313,912 313,912 1,255,638 Earnings (loss) applicable to common stock........ 114,135 (444,669) (49,154) 116,333 (263,355) Earningsstock................ (1,322,427) (3,264,669) (2,429,497) (1,954,387) (8,970,980) Basic earnings (loss) per average common share...share................ (.25) (.62) (.46) (.37) (1.71) Diluted earnings (loss) per average common share......... $ -- (.01)(.25) (.62) (.46) (.37) (1.71) 1997 Revenues.............. $3,597,401 3,068,455 3,170,563 3,064,942 12,901,361 Costs and Expenses.... 2,860,461 3,049,380 3,409,319 5,659,469 14,978,629 Gain on sale of assets............... 18 -- -- (.01) 1995 ---- Revenues................ $1,133,420 1,047,620 1,549,524 2,443,848 6,174,412 Costs and expenses...... 675,368 568,837 1,295,987 2,496,909 5,037,101 Income before extraordinary item..... 458,052 478,783 253,537 (53,061) 1,137,311 Extraordinary item-- early extinguishment of debt................... -- -- 482,906 -- 482,906688,286 688,304 Net income (loss)....... 458,052 478,783 (229,369) (53,061) 654,405..... 736,958 19,075 (238,756) (1,906,241) (1,388,964) Preferred stock dividends.............. 107,960 146,972 254,932 Incomedividends............ 263,315 314,102 313,891 313,902 1,205,210 Earnings (loss) applicable to common stock........ 458,052 478,783 (337,329) (200,033) 399,473 Earningsstock................ 473,643 (295,027) (552,647) (2,220,143) (2,594,174) Basic earnings (loss) per average common share... * * *share................ .09 (.06) (.11) (.42) (.50) Diluted earnings (loss) per average common share......... $ (-) *.09 (.06) (.11) (.42) (.50)
- -------- * Earnings per share information not presented duePrior to the entity not being in corporate form during the applicable periods. See pro forma presentationsale of earnings per share in the statement of operations. As noted in Note C to the consolidated financial statements, the Company's operational financial results reflect the operations solely of La/Cal for the periods prior to August 15, 1995, whereas such results reflect the operations of the combined entities for the periods subsequent to August 15, 1995. Accordingly,pipeline joint venture interest in the fourth quarter of 1995 amounts for revenues and costs and expenses reflect1997, the operations of the combined entities where as such amounts for the third quarter of 1995 reflect the operations solely of La/Cal from July 1 through August 14, 1995 plus the operations of the combined entities from August 15, 1995 through September 30, 1995. The Company's quarterly revenues and costs and expenses since August 15, 1995 arewere impacted by the fact that the Company's pipeline joint venture contract requiresrequired higher revenue payments in November through March versus April through October. Accordingly, the Company recordsrecorded the revenues as earned and matchesmatched related amortization with such revenues. Related revenue and amortization amounts for the fourth quarter of 1995 and the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 19961997 were approximately $459,000, $582,000, $244,000, $267,000$551,000, $268,000, $266,000 and $445,000$0 and $289,000, $392,000, $174,000, $174,000 and $319,000$0, respectively. The first, second, third and fourth quarter 1996of 1998 cost and expense amount containsamounts contain costs amounting to $438,000$0, $2,107,000, $1,496,000 and $81,000, respectively, related to dry holes during the quarter.holes. The fourth quarter 1996 cost and expense amount also contains $244,000 in accelerated depletion on three wells. The fourth quarter 1995 cost and expense amount contains 1) a charge for impairment of oil and gas properties of $157,000, 2) a provision for state franchise taxes$1,076,000. The third and fourth quarter 1997 cost and expense amounts contain costs amounting to $472,000 and $1,855,000, respectively, related to dry holes. The fourth quarter amount also contains impairment of approximately $60,000oil and 3) dry hole costsgas properties of approximately $50,000. ITEM$550,000. All earnings (loss) per share information has been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the one-for-eight reverse stock split in March 1998. Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None 4338 PART III ITEMItem 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. * ITEMItem 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.Executive Compensation. * ITEMItem 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. * ITEMItem 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. * *Reference is made to information under the captions "Election of Directors", "Executive Compensation", "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management", and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions", in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 19971999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 4439 PART IV ITEMItem 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORMExhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K. (a)1.Financial1. Financial Statements
PAGE ----- The following consolidated financial statements of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation are included in Part II, Item 8:
Page ----- Independent Auditors' Report...................................... 32Report............................................ 18 Consolidated Balance Sheets--December 31, 19961998 and 1995........... 33-341997................. 19 Consolidated Statements of Operations--Years ended December 31, 1996, 19951998, 1997 and 1994.............................................. 351996.......................................................... 20 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Years ended December 31, 1996, 19951998, 1997 and 1994.............................................. 361996.......................................................... 21 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity--Years ended December 31, 1996, 19951998, 1997 and 1994................................. 371996................................................ 22 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--Years ended December 31, 1996, 19951998, 1997 and 1994.......................................... 38-541996.................................................... 23-37 Consolidated Quarterly Income Information (Unaudited)............. 55................... 38
2.Financial2. Financial Statement Schedules The schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X are not required under the instructions contained therein, are inapplicable, or the information is included in the footnotes to the financial statements. (b)Reports on Form 8-K None (c)Exhibits 2. Exchange Agreement between La/Cal Energy Partners II and Certain Other Parties Named Herein, Goodrich Acquisition II, Inc. and Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Company's Report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 1996) 3. (i)3(i).1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated August 15, 1995, and filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 15, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 1995). (ii)3(i).2 Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation dated March 12, 1998. 3(ii).1 Bylaws of the Company, as amended and restated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 1995). 4.1 Credit Agreement betweenBetween Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana and Compass Bank-Houston dated August 15, 1995 and First Amendment thereto dated December 15, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995) 4.2 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana and Compass Bank dated June 1, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Company's Quarterly reportReport filed on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 1996.) 4.3 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana, GPC, Inc. of Louisiana and Compass Bank dated January 31, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. 4.4 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana, GPC, Inc. of Louisiana and Compass Bank dated June 1, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 1997.) 4.5 Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana, GPC, Inc. of Louisiana and Compass Bank dated October 16, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 1997.) 4.6 Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company's Registration Statement filed February 20, 1996 on Form S-8 (File No. 33-01077)).
40 4.7 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company's Registration Statement filed February 20, 1996Annual Report on Form S-8 (File No. 33-01077))10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996). 4.5 Certificate of Designations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of4.8 Amendment letter related to the Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Corporation.Company of Louisiana, GPC, Inc. of Louisiana and Compass Bank dated August 27, 1998. 4.9 Sixth amendment to the Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana and Compass Bank dated March 27, 1998. 4.10 Seventh amendment to the Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company, LLC (formerly Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana) and Compass Bank dated December 21, 1998. 10.1 Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 1995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)).
45 10.2 Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1995 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 1995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)). 10.310.2 Patrick Petroleum Company 1993 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 1995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)). 10.4 Form of Joint Participation Agreement between the Company and Goodrich Oil Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 1993 on Form S-4 (File No. 33- 58631)). 10.510.3 Form of Marketing Agreement between the Company and Natural Gas Ventures, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 19931995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)). 10.610.4 Natural Gas Marketing Joint Venture Agreement between Seaber Corporation and Natural Gas Ventures, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 19931995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)). 10.710.5 Form of Consulting Services Agreement between the Company and Henry Goodrich (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 19931995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33- 58631)). 10.810.6 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Walter G. Goodrich (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 19931995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33- 58631)). 10.910.7 Consulting Agreement with U.E. Patrick (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Registration Statement filed June 13, 19931995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)). 10.1010.8 Consulting Services Agreement between Leo E. Bromberg and Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 1995). 10.9 Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1997 Director Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy statement dated May 20, 1998) 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Inc. of Louisiana--incorporated in the state of Nevada Goodrich Petroleum Company LLC--incorporated in state of Louisiana Subsidiaries of Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana Drilling & Workover Company, Inc.--incorporated in state of Louisiana LECE, Inc.--incorporated in the state of Texas National Market Company--incorporated in state of Delaware 23 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 27 Financial Data Schedule, included elsewhere herein
4641 SIGNATURES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 ORor 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION (Registrant) Date: March 29, 1999 /s/ Walter G. Goodrich Date: March 20, 1997 By:__________________________________By___________________________________ Walter G. Goodrich, President, Chief Executive Officer PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED:this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated: Date: March 20, 199729, 1999
SIGNATURE TITLE --------- ----- Signature Title Chief Executive Officer and /s/ Walter G. Goodrich Director (Principal Executive - -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Officer) Walter G. Goodrich Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)Senior Vice President, /s/ Roland L. Frautschi - ------------------------------------------- Roland L. Frautschi Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial - - ----------------------------------- Officer (Principal Financial Roland L. Frautschi Officer) /s/ Glynn E. Williams, Jr. - ------------------------------------------- Glynn E. Williams, Jr. Vice President (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Lonnie J. Shaw Accounting Officer) - - ----------------------------------- Lonnie J. Shaw /s/ Sheldon Appel Director Treasurer - -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Sheldon Appel Director /s/ Basil M. Briggs Director - -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Basil M. Briggs Director /s/ Benjamin F. Edwards IIDirector - -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Benjamin F. Edwards II Director /s/ Henry Goodrich - ------------------------------------------- Henry Goodrich Director - ------------------------------------------- James R. Jenkins- ----------------------------------- Henry Goodrich /s/ Arthur A. Seeligson Director - ------------------------------------------- Wayne G. Kees Director - ------------------------------------------- John C. Napley Director /s/ J. Michael Watts - ------------------------------------------- J. Michael Watts Director - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Arthur A. Seeligson /s/ Jeff Benhard Director - - ----------------------------------- Jeff Benhard
4742