United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
 xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152016
OR
 oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number 1-11986 (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.)
Commission file number 333-3526-01 (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.)56-1815473
North Carolina (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)56-1822494
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360(336) 292-3010
Greensboro, NC 27408(Registrant's telephone number)
(Address of principal executive offices) 
  
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.:
Title of each className of exchange on which registered
Common Shares, $.01 par valueNew York Stock Exchange
  
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership:
None
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.: None
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes x   No o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes o   No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes o   No x
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes o   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes x   No o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes x   No o


1




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes x No o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K 229.405 of this chapter) isis not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
x Large accelerated filer
 
o Accelerated filer
 
o Non-accelerated filer
 
o Smaller reporting company

Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
o Large accelerated filer
 
o Accelerated filer
 
x Non-accelerated filer
 
o Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes o   No x
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes o   No x

The aggregate market value of voting shares held by non-affiliates of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. was approximately $2,986,664,064$3,808,013,373 based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange for such shares on June 30, 2015.2016.

The number of Common Shares of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. outstanding as of February 1, 20162017 was 95,880,825.96,259,265.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Part III incorporates certain information by reference fromPortions of Tanger Factory Outlet Center, Inc.'s definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

2




PART I

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152016 of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term "Company", refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term "Operating Partnership" refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States and Canada. The Company is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, ("REIT"), which, through its controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. The outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of the operations are conducted by, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.Partnership. Accordingly, the descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Company are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership. As the Operating Partnership is the issuer of our registered debt securities, we are required to present a separate set of financial statements for this entity.

The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company, through its ownership of Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust, owned 95,880,82596,095,891 units of the Operating Partnership and other limited partners (the "Non-Company LPs") collectively owned 5,052,7435,027,781 Class A common limited partnership units. Each Class A common limited partnership unit held by the Non-Company LPs is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's status as a REIT. Class B common limited partnership units, which are held by Tanger LP Trust, are not exchangeable for common shares of the Company.

Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the Company consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These individuals are officers of the Company and employees of the Operating Partnership. The individuals that comprise the Company's Board of Directors are also the same individuals that make up Tanger GP Trust's Board of Trustees.

We believe combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Company and the Operating Partnership into this single report results in the following benefits:

enhancing investors' understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

eliminating duplicative disclosure and providing a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and

creating time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.


3




There are only a few differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important, however to understand these differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how the Company and the Operating Partnership operate as an interrelated consolidated company.

As stated above, the Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. As a result, the Company does not conduct business itself, other than issuing public equity from time to time and incurring expenses required to operate as a public company. However, all operating expenses incurred by the Company are reimbursed by the Operating Partnership, thus the only material item on the Company's income statement is its equity in the earnings of the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities and the revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements, except for immaterial differences related to cash, other assets and accrued liabilities that arise from public company expenses paid by the Company. The Company itself does not hold any indebtedness but does guarantee certain debt of the Operating Partnership, as disclosed in this report.

The Operating Partnership holds all of the outlet centers and other assets, including the ownership interests in consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by the Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required through its operations, its incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units.

Noncontrolling interests, shareholder's equity and partners' capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership held by the Non-Company LPs are accounted for as partners' capital in the Operating Partnership's financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Company's financial statements.

To help investors understand the significant differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report presents the following separate sections for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership:

Consolidated financial statements;

The following notes to the consolidated financial statements:

Debt of the Company and the Operating Partnership;

Shareholders' Equity and Partners' Equity;

Earnings Per Share and Earnings Per Unit;

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of the Company and the Operating Partnership;

Liquidity and Capital Resources in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This report also includes separate Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of each entity have made the requisite certifications and that the Company and Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

The separate sections in this report for the Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that enters into contracts and joint ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and the Company operates the business through the Operating Partnership.


4




As
The Company currently consolidates the 100% owner of Tanger GP Trust,Operating Partnership because it has (1) the general partner with controlpower to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Company consolidatesOperating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes.that could be potentially significant. The separate discussions of the Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

The Company and the Operating Partnership

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries, which we refer to as the Company, is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States and Canada. We are a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, which focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. As of December 31, 2015,2016, our consolidated portfolio consisted of 3436 outlet centers, with a total gross leasable area of approximately 11.712.7 million square feet, which were 97%98% occupied and contained over 2,4002,600 stores representing approximately 400 store brands. We also had partial ownership interests in 9 unconsolildated8 unconsolidated outlet centers totaling approximately 2.72.3 million square feet, including 4 outlet centers in Canada.

Our outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted by, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries.subsidiaries, which we refer to as the Operating Partnership. The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership, through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest.

As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company, through its ownership of the Tanger GP and Tanger LP Trusts, owned 95,880,82596,095,891 units of the Operating Partnership and the Non-Company LPs collectively owned 5,052,7435,027,781 Class A common limited partnership units. Each Class A common limited partnership unit held by the Non-Company LPs is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's status as a REIT. Class B common limited partnership units, which are held by Tanger LP Trust, are not exchangeable for common shares of the Company.

Ownership of the Company's common shares is restricted to preserve the Company's status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Subject to certain exceptions, a person may not actually or constructively own more than 4% of our common shares. We also operate in a manner intended to enable us to preserve our status as a REIT, including, among other things, making distributions with respect to our then outstanding common shares and preferred shares, if applicable, equal to at least 90% of our taxable income each year.

The Company is a North Carolina corporation that was incorporated in March 1993 and the Operating Partnership is a North Carolina partnership that was formed in May 1993. Our executive offices are currently located at 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408 and our telephone number is (336) 292-3010. Our website can be accessed at www.tangeroutlet.com. A copy of our 10-Ks, 10-Qs, 8-Ks and any amendments thereto can be obtained, free of charge, on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this annual report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.


5




Recent Developments

Acquisitions of Partners' Interests

Westgate Acquisition

In June 2016, we completed the purchase of our partners' interest in the Westgate joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Glendale, Arizona, for a total cash price of approximately $40.9 million. Prior to the transaction, we owned a 58% interest in the Westgate joint venture since its formation in 2012 and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. The former joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and was consolidated in our financial results as of June 30, 2016.

The total cash price included $39.0 million to acquire the 40% ownership interest held by the equity partner in the joint venture. We also purchased the remaining 2% noncontrolling ownership interests in the Westgate outlet center held in a consolidated partnership for a purchase price of $1.9 million. The acquisition of the noncontrolling ownership interest was recorded as an equity transaction and, as a result, the carrying balances of the noncontrolling interest were eliminated and the remaining difference between the purchase price and carrying balance was recorded as a reduction in additional-paid-in-capital. We funded the total purchase price with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. At the time of the acquisition, the property was subject to a $62.0 million mortgage loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.75% and a maturity in June 2017. In August 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan in full with proceeds from the public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2026.

Savannah Acquisition

In August 2016, the Savannah joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Pooler, Georgia distributed all outparcels along with $15.0 million in cash consideration to the other partner in exchange for the partner's ownership interest. We contributed the $15.0 million in cash consideration to the joint venture, which we funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. At the time of acquisition, the property was subject to a $96.9 million construction loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%, that would have matured in May 2017. In September 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.

The former joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and was consolidated in our financial results as of the acquisition date.  Prior to this transaction, we owned a 50% legal interest in the joint venture since its formation and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. However, due to preferred equity contributions we made to the joint venture, and the returns earned on those contributions, our estimated economic interest in the book value of the assets was approximately 98%. Therefore, substantially all of the earnings of the joint venture were previously recognized by us as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures. 

New Development of Consolidated Outlet Centers

FoxwoodsDaytona Beach

In May 2015,November 2016, we opened an approximately 312,000349,000 square foot, wholly-owned, outlet center in Daytona Beach, Florida. This outlet center features over 80 brand name and designer outlet stores.

Lancaster Expansion

In July 2016, we commenced construction on a 123,000 square foot expansion of our outlet center in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. The expansion is expected to be open by the third quarter of 2017.

Fort Worth

In September 2016, we purchased land in the greater Fort Worth, Texas area for approximately $11.2 million and began construction immediately on the development of a wholly-owned outlet center. The outlet center will be located within the 279-acre Champions Circle mixed-use development adjacent to Texas Motor Speedway. The outlet center is expected to be open by Holiday 2017.



6




Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

Columbus

In June 2016, we opened an approximately 355,000 square foot outlet center at the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Mashantucket, Connecticut. We own a controlling interest in the joint venture which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes.Columbus, Ohio. As of December 31, 2015, our partner’s equity contributions totaled approximately $1.0 million2016, we and our equity contributions totaled approximately $58.8 million. Contributions we make in excess of $40.0partner had each contributed $47.5 million earn a preferred rate of return of 15% fromto fund development activities. In November 2016, the date of contribution. In addition, each partner earns a rate of return of 10% on their initial capital contributions from the date of contribution. Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our partner. Accordingly, we expect our current economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage of 67%. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value, our economic interest would represent substantially all of the economic benefit of the property. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.

In December 2014, the consolidated joint venture closed on aan interest-only mortgage loan with the ability to borrow up to $70.3of $85.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. The loan initially matures in December 2017,November 2019, with two one-year extension options. AsThe joint venture received net loan proceeds of December 31, 2015,$84.2 million and distributed them equally to the balance onpartners. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the loan was $70.3 million.

Grand Rapids

In July 2015,joint venture. During construction, our partner provided development services to the joint venture and we, opened an approximately 352,000 square foot wholly-owned outlet center near Grand Rapids, Michigan. The outlet center is located 11 miles south of downtown Grand Rapids at the southwest quadrant of US-131 and 84th Street in Byron Township, Michigan,along with visibility from both roads.our partner, provided joint leasing services.

Southaven

In November 2015, we opened an approximately 320,000 square foot outlet center in Southaven, Mississippi. In January 2015, we purchased land for approximately $14.8 million and commenced construction on the development of Tanger Outlets Southaven, which is located less than five miles south of Memphis, Tennessee. We own a controlling interest in the joint venture which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. As of December 31, 2015, our partner’s equity contributions totaled approximately $461,000and our equity contributions totaled approximately $26.5 million. From the date our equity contributions are made, we earn a preferred rate of return of 10% for senior contributions and 14% for junior contributions. As of December 31, 2015, the balance of our senior contributions was $17.7 million and our junior contributions was $8.3 million.

Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our partner. Accordingly, we expect our current economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage of 50%. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value, our economic interest would represent substantially all of the economic benefit of the property. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.

In April 2015, the consolidated joint venture closed on a mortgage loan with the ability to borrow up to $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR +1.75%. The loan initially matures on April 29, 2018, with one two-year extension option. As of December 31, 2015, the balance on the loan was $45.8 million.






6




Daytona Beach

In November 2015, we purchased land for approximately $9.9 million and commenced construction on the development of a wholly owned outlet center in Daytona Beach, Florida. The outlet center is expected to be approximately 352,000 square feet and to open by Holiday 2016.

Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

Westgate

In November 2012, we opened our Westgate outlet center, located in Glendale, Arizona, which was developed through, and currently owned by, a joint venture that was formed in May 2012.

During the first quarter of 2015, the joint venture completed the remaining 28,000 square feet of a 78,000 square foot expansion of the existing property which upon completion increased the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 411,000 square feet. Construction commenced on the expansion during the second quarter of 2014 and was funded with borrowings under the amended Westgate mortgage loan. The joint venture's amended and restated construction loan is fully funded with a balance of $62.0 million as of December 31, 2015. The loan initially matured in June 2015, and during the second quarter of 2015 the joint venture exercised the two year option to extend the maturity date of the loan to June 2017.

Savannah

In April 2015, we opened an approximately 377,000 square foot outlet center in Savannah, Georgia. As of December 31, 2015, our equity contributions totaled $45.8 million and our partner’s equity contributions totaled $8.3 million. Contributions we made in excess of our partners' equity contributions are considered preferred equity and earned a preferred rate of return equal to 8% from the date the contributions were made until the outlet center’s grand opening in April 2015, and will earn 10% annually thereafter. Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned preferred equity contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our equity partner. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based at depreciated book value, our estimated economic interest in the venture was approximately 98%. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.

In May 2014, the joint venture closed on a construction loan with the ability to borrow up to $97.7 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. In September 2015, the loan maximum borrowing amount was increased to $100.9 million. The construction loan has a maturity date of May 21, 2017, with two, one -year extension options. As of December 31, 2015, the balance on the loan was $89.5 million. The additional $11.4 million is available for construction of the approximately 42,000 square foot expansion that is currently in process.

Columbus

During the second quarter of 2015, the joint venture purchased land for approximately $8.9 million and began construction on a 350,000 square foot outlet center in Columbus, Ohio. We and our partner currently expect to complete construction in time to open the center during the second quarter of 2016. The construction of the center is currently being funded with equity contributions from the partners. As of December 31, 2015, we and our partner had each contributed $20.6 million to fund development activities.


7



Dispositions of Consolidated Outlet Centers and sale of our Interest in an Unconsolidated Outlet Center

Wisconsin Dells

In February 2015, we sold our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the outlet center located in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin for approximately $15.6 million, representing our share of the sales price totaling $27.7 million less our share of the outstanding debt, which totaled $12.1 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of approximately$13.7 millionin the first quarter of 2015, which represents the difference between the carrying value of our equity method investment and the net proceeds received.

Kittery I&II, Tuscola, West Branch, and Barstow

During 2015, we sold five outlet centers for net proceeds of approximately $149.1 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $106.7 million. The outlet centers were located in Kittery, Maine (two centers); Tuscola, Illinois; West Branch, Michigan; and Barstow, California.

As of December 31, 2015, approximately $121.3 million of these proceeds were held by a qualified intermediary and thus have been classified as restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets. During January 2016, we used a portion of these proceeds along with amounts under our unsecured lines of credit:

To repay a $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan and a $28.4 million deferred financing obligation, both of which are related to our 749,000 square foot outlet center in Deer Park, New York. These transactions allowed us to unencumber the Deer Park asset while simultaneously deferring a significant portion of the gains related to the asset sales for tax purposes.
To pay a special dividend to our share and unit holders of $0.21 per share on January 15, 2016.

We plan on investing the remaining sales proceeds, totaling approximately $16.8 million, in qualified replacement property, including the ongoing construction of our wholly-owned new outlet center development project in Daytona Beach.

Fort Myers

In January 2016, we sold our outlet center in Fort Myers, Florida located near Sanibel Island for net proceeds of approximately $25.8 million. We estimate themillion for a gain to be recognized in the first quarter of 2016 to be approximately $4.9 million. The proceeds from the sale of this unencumbered asset were used to pay down balances outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit.

From time to time, we may sell one or more outlet centers or joint venture interests that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. We have not entered into a binding contract and have not obtained approval from our Board of Directors to sell any additional outlet centers or joint venture interests, thus we can give no assurance that any additional sales will be completed.

Financing Transactions

Deer Park Debt Repayment

In connection with the acquisition of the Deer Park propertyJanuary 2016, we repaid our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which had an original maturity date in 2013, weAugust 2018 and the noncontrolling interest entered into an agreement whereby they may require uswas related to acquire their ownership interest in the property on the second anniversary of the acquisition date for a price of $28.4 million, and we had the option to acquire their ownership interest on the fourth anniversary of the acquisition date at the same price. On September 30, 2015, the noncontrolling interest in our 749,000 square foot Deer Park outlet center exercised its rightcenter.

Unsecured Term Loan

In April 2016, we amended our unsecured term loan to require usincrease the size of the loan from $250.0 million to acquire its ownership interest. As$325.0 million, extend the maturity date from February 23, 2019 to April 13, 2021, reduce the interest rate spread over LIBOR from 1.05% to 0.95%, and increase the incremental loan availability through an accordion feature from $150.0 million to $175.0 million.

Derivatives

In April 2016, we entered into four separate interest rate swap agreements, effective April 13, 2016 that fix the base LIBOR rate at an average of December 31, 2015,1.03% on notional amounts totaling $175.0 million through January 1, 2021.

Aggregate $350.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes due 2026

In August 2016, we completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2026 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 99.605% of the obligationprincipal amount to acquire its interest was recorded as a deferred financing obligation in the other liabilities sectionyield 3.171% to maturity. In October 2016, we sold an additional $100.0 million of our consolidated balance sheet.senior notes due 2026. The transaction closednotes priced at 98.962% of the principal amount to yield 3.248% to maturity. The notes pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.125% per annum and mature on January 5, 2016.


8



ExtensionSeptember 1, 2026. The aggregate net proceeds from the offerings, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $344.5 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of Unsecured Lines of Credit

We maintain unsecured lines of credit that provide forthe notes to repay a $62.0 million floating rate mortgage loan related to the outlet center in Glendale (Westgate), Arizona, repay borrowings of up to $520.0 million. The unsecured lines of credit include a $20.0 million liquidity line and a $500.0 million syndicated line. In October 2015, we closed on amendments tounder our unsecured lines of credit, extending the maturity and reducing our interest rate. The maturity date of these facilities was extended from October 2017 to October 2019 with the ability to further extend the maturity date for an additional year at our option. The interest rate was reduced from LIBOR + 1.00% to LIBOR + 0.90% based on our current credit rating and the maximum borrowings to which the syndicated line could be increased through an accordion feature in certain circumstances was increased from $750.0 million to $1.0 billion. Loan origination costs associated with the amendments totaled approximately $2.0 million.general corporate purposes.

Board of Directors and Management Changes

In October 2015, our Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Board's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, voted to expand, effective January 1, 2016, the number of positions on the Company's board of directors from eight to nine and elected David B. Henry as a director to fill the vacancy, effective January 1, 2016. Mr. Henry is the recently retired Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Kimco Realty Corporation. Mr. Henry will serve as a director until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor is elected and qualified.
7
In October 2015, Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Vice President and Treasurer of the Operating Partnership, notified us that he will retire, effective May 20, 2016. James F. Williams, the Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company and the Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of the Operating Partnership will succeed Mr. Marchisello as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Vice President and Treasurer of the Operating Partnership effective May 20, 2016.



The Outlet Concept

Outlets areOutlet centers generally consist of stores operated by manufacturers and brand name retailers that sell primarily first quality, branded products, some of which are made specifically for the outlet distribution channel, to consumers at significant discounts from regular retail prices charged by department stores and specialty stores. Outlet centers offer advantages to manufacturers and brand name retailers as they are often able to charge customers lower prices for brand name and designer products by eliminating the third party retailer. Outlet centers also typically have lower operating costs than other retailing formats, enhancing their profit potential. Outlet centers enable themretailers to optimize the size of production runs while continuing to maintain control of their distribution channels. Outlet centers also enable manufacturers and brand name retailers to establish a direct relationship with their customers.

We believe that outlet centers will continue to present an attractive opportunitiesopportunity for capital investment in the long-term. We further believe, based upon our contacts with present and prospective tenants thatas many companies will continue to utilizeretailers view the outlet concept as a profitable distribution vehicle.channel. However, due to present economic conditions, the availability of multiple retail channels, and the potential for increased competition from other developers announcing plans to develop outlet centers,center developers, new developments or expansions may not provide an initial return on investment as high as has been historically achieved.

Our Outlet Centers

Each of our outlet centers, except one joint venture property, carries the Tanger brand name. We believe that our tenants and consumers recognize the Tanger brand as one that provides outlet shopping centers where consumers can trust the brand, quality and price of the merchandise they purchase directly from the manufacturers and brand name retailers.

As one of the original participants in this industry, we have established long-standing relationships with many of our tenants that we believe is critical in developing and operating successful outlet centers.

Our consolidated outlet centers range in size from 82,161 to 749,074 square feet and are typically located at least 10 miles from major department stores and manufacturer-owned, full-price retail stores. Historically, manufacturers prefer these locations so that they do not compete directly with their major customers and their own stores. Many of our outlet centers are located near tourist destinations to attract tourists who consider shopping to be a recreational activity. Additionally, our centers are often situated in close proximity to interstate highways that provide accessibility and visibility to potential customers.

9




We have a diverse tenant base throughout our consolidated portfolio, comprised of approximately 400 different well-known, upscale, national designer or brand name concepts, such as Ann Taylor, American Eagle Outfitters, Banana Republic Factory Store, Barneys New York, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Giorgio Armani, Hugo Boss Factory Store, J. Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lululemon Athletica, Michael Kors, Nike Factory Store, North Face, Polo Ralph Lauren Factory Store, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th,  Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, Victoria’s  Secret, Vineyard Vines and others.

No single tenant, including all of its store concepts, accounted for 10% or more of our combined base and percentage rental revenues during 2016, 2015 2014 or 2013.2014. As of December 31, 2015,2016, no single tenant accounted for more than 7.5%7.6% of our leasable square feet or 6.0%6.2% of our combined base and percentage rental revenues. Because many of our tenants are large, multinational manufacturers or retailers, we generally dohave not experienceexperienced material losses with respect to rent collections or lease defaults.

Only small portions of our revenues are dependent on contingent revenue sources. Revenues from fixed rents and operating expense reimbursements accounted for approximately 91% of our total revenues in 2015.2016. Revenues from contingent sources, such as percentage rents, vending income and miscellaneous income, accounted for approximately 9% of our total revenues in 2015.2016.


8




Business History

Stanley K. Tanger, the Company's founder, entered the outlet center business in 1981. Prior to founding our company, Stanley K. Tanger and his son, Steven B. Tanger, our President and Chief Executive Officer, built and managed a successful family owned apparel manufacturing business, Tanger/Creighton, Inc., which included the operation of five outlet stores. Based on their knowledge of the apparel and retail industries, as well as their experience operating Tanger/Creighton, Inc.'s outlet stores, they recognized that there would be a demand for outlet centers where a number of manufacturers could operate in a single location and attract a large number of shoppers.

Steven B. Tanger joined the Company in 1986, and by June 1993, the Tangers had developed 17 outlet centers totaling approximately 1.5 million square feet. In June 1993, we completed our initial public offering, making Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. the first publicly traded outlet center company. Since our initial public offering, we have grown our portfolio through the strategic development, expansion and acquisition of outlet centers and are now one of the largest owner operators of outlet centers in the United States and Canada.

Business Strategy

Our company has been built on a firm foundation of strong and enduring business relationships coupled with conservative business practices. We partner with many of the world's best known and most respected retailers and manufacturers. By fostering and maintaining strong tenant relationships with these successful, high volume companies, we have been able to solidify our position as a leader in the outlet industry for well over a quarter century. The confidence and trust that we have developed with our retail partners from the very beginning has allowed us to forge the impressive retail alliances that we enjoy today with our brand name retailers and manufacturers.

We have had a solid track record of success in the outlet industry for the past 3536 years. In 1993, Tanger led the way by becoming the industry's first outlet center company to be publicly traded. Our seasoned team of real estate professionals utilize the knowledge and experience that we have gained to give us a competitive advantage in the outlet business.

As of December 31, 2015,2016, our consolidated outlet centers were 97%98% occupied with average tenant sales of $395$394 per square foot. Our portfolio of properties has had an average occupancy rate of 95% or greater on December 31st of each year since 1981. We believe our ability to achieve this level of performance is a testament to our long-standing tenant relationships, industry experience and our expertise in the development, leasing and operation of outlet centers.


10



Growth Strategy

Our goal is to build shareholder value through a comprehensive, conservative plan for sustained, long-term growth. We focus our efforts on increasing rents in our existing outlet centers, renovating and expanding selected outlet centers and reaching new markets through ground-up developments or acquisitions of existing outlet centers. We expect new development to continue to be important to the growth of our portfolio in the long-term. Future outlet centers may be wholly-owned by us or developed through joint venture arrangements.

Increasing rents at existing outlet centers

Our leasing team focuses on the marketing of available space to maintain our standard for high occupancy levels. Leases are negotiated to provide for inflation-based contractual rent increases or periodic fixed contractual rent increases and percentage rents. Due to the overall high performance of our outlet shopping centers, we have historically been able to renew leases at higher base rents per square-foot and attract stronger, more popular brands to replace underperforming tenants.

Developing new outlet centers

We believe that there continue to be opportunities to introduce the Tanger brand in untapped or under-served markets across the United States and Canada in the long-term. We believe our 3536 years of outlet industry experience, extensive development expertise and strong retail relationships give us a distinct competitive advantage.


9




In order to identify new markets across North America, we follow a general set of guidelines when evaluating opportunities for the development of new outlet centers. This typically includes seeking locations within markets that have at least 1 million people residing within a 30 to 40 mile radius with an average household income of at least $65,000 per year, frontage on a major interstate or roadway that has excellent visibility and a traffic count of at least 55,000 cars per day. Leading tourist, vacation and resort markets that receive at least 5 million visitors annually are also closely evaluated. Although our current goal is to target sites that are large enough to support outlet centers with approximately 80 to 90 stores totaling at least 325,000 to 350,000 square feet, we maintain the flexibility to vary our minimum requirements based on the unique characteristics of a site, tenant demand and our prospects for future growth and success.

In order to help ensure the viability of proceeding with a project, we gauge the interest of our retail partners first. We typically prefer to have signed leases or leases out for negotiation with tenants for at least 50%60% of the space in each outlet center prior to acquiring the site and beginning construction; however, we may choose to proceed with construction with less than 50%60% of the space pre-leased under certain circumstances. Construction of a new outlet center has typically taken us nine to twelve months from groundbreaking to grand opening of the outlet center.

Expanding and renovating existing outlet centers

Keeping our outlet shopping centers vibrant and growing is a key part of our formula for success. In order to maintain our reputation as the premiere outlet shopping destination in the markets that we serve, we have an ongoing program of renovations and expansions taking place at our outlet centers. Construction for expansion and renovation to existing properties typically takes less time, usually between six to nine months depending on the scope of the project.

Acquiring Outlet Centers

As a means of creating a presence in key markets and to create shareholder value, we may selectively choose to acquire individual properties or portfolios of properties that meet our strategic investment criteria. We believe that our extensive experience in the outlet center business, access to capital markets, familiarity with real estate markets and our management experience will allow us to evaluate and execute our acquisition strategy successfully over time. Through our tenant relationships, our leasing professionals have the ability to implement a re-merchandising strategy when needed to increase occupancy rates and value. We believe that our managerial skills, marketing expertise and overall outlet industry experience will also allow us to add long-term value and viability to these outlet centers.


11



Operating Strategy

Increasing cash flow to enhance the value of our properties and operations remains a primary business objective. Through targeted marketing and operational efficiencies, we strive to improve sales and profitability of our tenants and our outlet centers as a whole. Achieving higher base and percentage rents and generating additional income from temporary leasing, vending and other sources also remains an important focus and goal.

Leasing

Our long-standing retailer relationships and our focus on identifying emerging retailers allow us the ability to provide our shoppers with a collection of the world's most popular outlet stores. Tanger customers shop and save on their favorite brand name merchandise including men's, women's and children's ready-to-wear, lifestyle apparel, footwear, jewelry and accessories, tableware, housewares, luggage and domestichome goods. In order for our outlet centers to perform at a high level, our leasing professionals continually monitor and evaluate tenant mix, store size, store location and sales performance. They also work to assist our tenants through re-sizing and re-location of retail space within each of our outlet centers for maximum sales of each retail unit across our portfolio.


10




Marketing
 
Our marketing plans deliver compelling, well-crafted messages and enticing promotions and events to targeted audiences for tangible, meaningful and measurable results. Our plans are based on a basic measure of success - increase sales and traffic for our retail partners and we will create successful outlet centers. Utilizing a strategic mix of print, radio, television, direct mail, our consumer website, Internet advertising, social networks, mobile applications and public relations, we consistently reinforce the Tanger brand. Our marketing efforts are also designed to build loyalty with current Tanger shoppers and create awareness with potential customers. The majority of consumer-marketing expenses incurred by us are reimbursable by our tenants.

Capital Strategy

We believe we achieve a strong and flexible financial position by attempting to: (1) maintain a conservative leverage position relative to our portfolio when pursuing new development, expansion and acquisition opportunities, (2) extend and sequence debt maturities, (3) manage our interest rate risk through a proper mix of fixed and variable rate debt, (4) maintain access to liquidity by using our lines of credit in a conservative manner and (5) preserve internally generated sources of capital by strategically divesting of our non-core assets and maintaining a conservative distribution payout ratio. We manage our capital structure to reflect a long-term investment approach and utilize multiple sources of capital to meet our requirements.

We intend to retain the ability to raise additional capital, including public debt or equity, to pursue attractive investment opportunities that may arise and to otherwise act in a manner that we believe to be in the best interests of our shareholders and unit holders.unitholders. The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with a shelf registration that allows us to register unspecified amounts of different classes of securities on Form S-3. To generate capital to reinvest into other attractive investment opportunities, we may also consider the use of additional operational and developmental joint ventures, the sale or lease of outparcels on our existing properties and the sale of certain properties that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. Based on cash provided by operations, existing lines of credit, ongoing relationships with certain financial institutions and our ability to sell debt or issue equity subject to market conditions, we believe that we have access to the necessary financing to fund our planned capital expenditures during 2016.2017.
 
We anticipate that adequate cash will be available to fund our operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, and the payment of dividends in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short and long-term. Although we receive most of our rental payments on a monthly basis, distributions to shareholders and unitholders are made quarterly and interest payments on the senior, unsecured notes are made semi-annually. Amounts accumulated for such payments will be used in the interim to reduce the outstanding borrowings under our existing lines of credit or invested in short-term money market or other suitable instruments adhering to our investment policies.


12



We believe our current balance sheet position is financially sound; however, due to the uncertainty and unpredictability of the capital and credit markets, we can give no assurance that affordable access to capital will exist between now and 2019 when our next significant debt maturity, occurs.our unsecured line of credit facilities, occurs in 2019. As a result, our current primary focus is to continually strengthen our capital and liquidity position by controlling and reducing construction and overhead costs, generating positive cash flows from operations to cover our distributions and reducing outstanding debt.

Competition

We carefully consider the degree of existing and planned competition in a proposed area before deciding to develop, acquire or expand a new outlet center. Our outlet centers compete for customers primarily with outlet centers built and operated by different developers, traditional shopping malls, full-and off-price retailers and to a certain extent e-commerce retailers. However, we believe that the majority of our customers visit outlet centers because they are intent on buying name-brand products at discounted prices. Traditional full-and off-price retailers and e-commerce retailers are often unable to provide such a variety of and depth of name-brand products at attractive prices.

Tenants of outlet centers typically avoid direct competition with major retailers and their own specialty stores, and, therefore, generally insist that the outlet centers not be within a close proximity of a major department storestores or the tenants' own specialty stores. For this reason, our outlet centers generally compete only to a limited extent with traditional malls in or near metropolitan areas.

11





We compete with institutional pension funds, private equity investors, other REITs, smallindividual owners of outlet centers, specialty stores and others who are engaged in the acquisition, development or ownership of outlet centers and stores. In addition, the number of entities competing to acquire or develop outlet centers has increased and may continue to increase in the future, which could increase demand for these outlet centers and the prices we must pay to acquire or develop them. Nevertheless, we believe the high barriers to entry in the outlet industry, including the need for extensive marketing programs to drive traffic to the centers and relationships with premier manufacturers and brand name retailers, will continue to minimizelimit the number of new outlet centers developed each year.

Financial Information

As of December 31, 2015, and 2014, we hadWe have one reportable operating segment. For financial information regarding our segment, see our Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.

Corporate and Regional Headquarters

We rent space in an office building in Greensboro, North Carolina where our corporate headquarters is located as well as a regional office in Miami, Florida.

As of February 1, 2016,2017, we maintain offices and employ on-site managers at 3738 consolidated and unconsolidated outlet centers. The managers closely monitor the operation, marketing and local relationships at each of their outlet centers.

Insurance

We believe that as a whole our properties are covered by adequate comprehensive liability, fire, flood, earthquake and extended loss insurance provided by reputable companies with commercially reasonable and customary deductibles and limits. Northline Indemnity, LLC, ("Northline"), a wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, is responsible for losses up to certain levels for property damage (including wind damage from hurricanes) prior to third-party insurance coverage. Specified types and amounts of insurance are required to be carried by each tenant under their lease. There are however, types of losses, like those resulting from wars or nuclear radiation, which may either be uninsurable or not economically insurable in some or all of our locations. An uninsured loss could result in a loss to us of both our capital investment and anticipated profits from the affected property.


13



Employees

As of February 1, 2016,2017, we had 291297 full-time employees, located at our corporate headquarters in North Carolina, our regional office in Miami and 3740 business offices. At that date, we also employed 334362 part-time employees at various locations.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Real Estate Investments

We may be unable to develop new outlet centers or expand existing outlet centers successfully.

We continue to develop new outlet centers and expand existing outlet centers as opportunities arise. However, there are significant risks associated with our development activities in addition to those generally associated with the ownership and operation of established retail properties. While we have policies in place designed to limit the risks associated with development, these policies do not mitigate all development risks associated with a project. These risks include the following:

significant expenditure of money and time on projects that may be delayed or never be completed;

higher than projected construction costs;

shortage of construction materials and supplies;

12





failure to obtain zoning, occupancy or other governmental approvals or to the extent required, tenant approvals; and

late completion because of construction delays, delays in the receipt of zoning, occupancy and other approvals or other factors outside of our control.

Any or all of these factors may impede our development strategy and adversely affect our overall business.

The economic performance and the market value of our outlet centers are dependent on risks associated with real property investments.

Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. The economic performance and values of real estate may be affected by many factors, including changes in the national, regional and local economic climate, inflation, changes in government policies and regulations, unemployment rates, consumer confidence, local conditions such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area, the attractiveness of the properties to tenants, competition from other available space, our ability to provide adequate maintenance and insurance and increased operating costs.

Real property investments are relatively illiquid.

Our outlet centers represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets. These assets are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our outlet centers in response to any changes in economic or other conditions is limited. If we want to sell an outlet center, there can be no assurance that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or that the sales price will exceed the cost of our investment.


14



Properties may be subject to impairment charges which can adversely affect our financial results.

We periodically evaluate long-lived assets to determine if there has been any impairment in their carrying values and record impairment losses if the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their carrying amounts or if there are other indicators of impairment.  If it is determined that an impairment has occurred, we would be required to record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the asset's carrying value over its estimated fair value, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results in the accounting period in which the adjustment is made.  Our estimates of undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, but not limited to, estimated hold period, terminal capitalization rates, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, the future cash flows estimated in our impairment analysis may not be achieved.

Dispositions may not achieve anticipated results.

From time to time, we may strategically dispose of assets with the goal of improving the overall performance of our core portfolio. However, we may not achieve the results we originally anticipated at the time of disposition. If we are not successful at achieving the anticipated results, there is a potential for a significant adverse impact on our returns and our overall profitability.


13




We face competition for the acquisition and development of outlet centers, and we may not be able to complete acquisitions or developments that we have identified.

We intend to grow our business in part through acquisitions and new developments. We compete with institutional pension funds, private equity investors, other REITs, small owners of outlet centers, specialty stores and others who are engaged in the acquisition, development or ownership of outlet centers and stores. These competitors may succeed in acquiring or developing outlet centers themselves. Also, our potential acquisition targets may find our competitors to be more attractive acquirers because they may have greater marketing and financial resources, may be willing to pay more, or may have a more compatible operating philosophy. In addition, the number of entities competing to acquire or develop outlet centers has increased and may continue to increase in the future, which could increase demand for these outlet centers and the prices we must pay to acquire or develop them. If we pay higher prices for outlet centers, our profitability may be reduced. Also, once we have identified potential acquisitions, such acquisitions are subject to the successful completion of due diligence, the negotiation of definitive agreements and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to reach acceptable terms with the sellers or that these conditions will be satisfied.

We may be subject to environmental regulation.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, we may be considered an owner or operator of real property and may be responsible for paying for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances released on or in our property or disposed of by us, as well as certain other potential costs which could relate to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property). This liability may be imposed whether or not we knew about, or were responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances.

Possible terrorist activity or other acts or threats of violence and threats to public safety could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Terrorist attacks and threats of terrorist attacks, whether in the United States, Canada or elsewhere, or other acts or threats of violence may result in declining economic activity, which could harm the demand for goods and services offered by our tenants and the value of our properties and might adversely affect the value of an investment in our securities. Such a resulting decrease in retail demand could make it difficult for us to renew or re-lease our properties.

Terrorist activities or violence also could directly affect the value of our properties through damage, destruction or loss. In addition, these acts and threats might erode business and consumer confidence and spending, and might result in increased volatility in national and international financial markets and economies. Any one of these events might decrease demand for real estate, decrease or delay the occupancy of our properties, impair the ability of tenants to meet their obligations under their existing leases, and limit our access to capital or increase our cost of raising capital.

15




Risks Related to our Business

Our earnings and therefore our profitability are entirely dependent on rental income from real property.

Substantially all of our income is derived from rental income from real property. Our income and funds for distribution would be adversely affected if rental rates at our centers decrease, if a significant number of our tenants were unable to meet their obligations to us or if we were unable to lease a significant amount of space in our outlet centers on economically favorable lease terms. In addition, the terms of outlet store tenant leases traditionally have been significantly shorter than in other retail segments. There can be no assurance that any tenant whose lease expires in the future will renew such lease or that we will be able to re-lease space on economically favorable terms.


14




We are substantially dependent on the results of operations of our retailers.

Our operations are subject to the results of operations of our retail tenants. A portion of our rental revenues are derived from percentage rents that directly depend on the sales volume of certain tenants. Accordingly, declines in these tenants' results of operations would reduce the income produced by our properties. If the sales or profitability of our retail tenants decline sufficiently, whether due to a change in consumer preferences, legislative changes that increase the cost of their operations or otherwise, such tenants may be unable to pay their existing rents as such rents would represent a higher percentage of their sales. Any resulting leasing delays, failures to make payments or tenant bankruptcies could result in the termination of such tenants' leases.

A number of companies in the retail industry, including some of our tenants, have declared bankruptcy or have voluntarily closed certain of their stores in recent years. The bankruptcy of a major tenant or number of tenants may result in the closing of certain affected stores, and we may not be able to re-lease the resulting vacant space for some time or for equal or greater rent. Such bankruptcy, or the voluntary closings of a significant amount of stores, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could result in a lower level of funds for distribution.

Certain of our properties are subject to ownership interests held by third parties, whose interests may conflict with ours and thereby constrain us from taking actions concerning these properties which otherwise would be in our best interests and our shareholders' interests.

We own partial interests in outlet centers with various joint venture partners. The approval or consent of the other members of these joint ventures is required before we may sell, finance, expand or make other significant changes in the operations of these properties. We also may not have control over certain major decisions, including approval of the annual operating budgets, selection or termination of the property management company, leasing and the timing and amount of distributions, which could result in decisions that do not fully reflect our interests. To the extent such approvals or consents are required, we may experience difficulty in, or may be prevented from, implementing our plans and strategies with respect to expansion, development, property management, on-going operations, financing (for example, decisions as to whether to refinance or obtain financing, when and whether to pay down principal of any loan and whether and how to cure any defaults under loan documents) or other similar transactions with respect to such properties.

An uninsured loss or a loss that exceeds our insurance policies on our outlet centers or the insurance policies of our tenants could subject us to lost capital and revenue on those outlet centers.

Some of the risks to which our outlet centers are subject, including risks of terrorist attacks, war, earthquakes, hurricanes and other natural disasters, are not insurable or may not be insurable in the future. Should a loss occur that is uninsured or in an amount exceeding the combined aggregate limits for the insurance policies noted above or in the event of a loss that is subject to a substantial deductible under an insurance policy, we could lose all or part of our capital invested in and anticipated revenue from one or more of our outlet centers, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, as well as our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.


16



Under the terms and conditions of our leases, tenants generally are required to indemnify and hold us harmless from liabilities resulting from injury to persons and contamination of air, water, land or property, on or off the premises, due to activities conducted in the leased space, except for claims arising from negligence or intentional misconduct by us or our agents. Additionally, tenants generally are required, at the tenant's expense, to obtain and keep in full force during the term of the lease, liability and property damage insurance policies issued by companies acceptable to us. These policies include liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the leased space. All of these policies may involve substantial deductibles and certain exclusions. Therefore, an uninsured loss or loss that exceeds the insurance policies of our tenants could also subject us to lost capital and revenue.


15




Consumer spending habits may change.

Shoppers may choose to spend a greater percentage of their disposable income to purchase goods through e-commerce or other retail channels, which could reduce the number of trips to our outlet centers and the average amount spent per visit. Such a change in consumer spending habits could adversely affect the results of operations of our retail tenants and adversely impact our percentage rents and ability to renew and release space at favorable rental rates.

Our Canadian investments may subject us to different or greater risk from those associated with our domestic operations.

As of December 31, 2015,2016, through a co-ownership arrangement with a Canadian REIT, we have an ownership interest in four properties in Canada.  Our operating results and the value of our Canadian operations may be impacted by any unhedged movements in the Canadian dollar. Canadian ownership activities carry risks that are different from those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include:

adverse effects of changes in the exchange rates between the US and Canadian dollar;

changes in Canadian political and economic environments, regionally, nationally, and locally;

challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws;

changes in applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations;

property management services being provided directly by our 50/50 ​co-owner, not by us; and

obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and cash.

Our success significantly depends on our key personnel and our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
Our success depends upon the personal efforts and abilities of our senior management team and other key personnel. Although we believe we have a strong management team with relevant industry expertise, the extended loss of the services of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the securities markets' view of our prospects and materially harm our business. Also, our continued success and the achievement of our expansion goals are dependent upon our ability to attract and retain additional qualified employees as we expand.

Risks Related to our Indebtedness and Financial Markets

We are subject to the risks associated with debt financing.

We are subject to the risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that the cash provided by our operating activities will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. Disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our operations, including the ability to fund the planned capital expenditures and potential new developments or acquisitions. Further, there is the risk that we will not be able to repay or refinance existing indebtedness or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If we are unable to access capital markets to refinance our indebtedness on acceptable terms, we might be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms, which might result in losses.

17




The Operating Partnership guarantees debt or otherwise provides support for a number of joint venture properties.

Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by a mortgage on the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. A default by a joint venture under its debt obligations may expose us to liability under a guaranty. We may elect to fund cash needs of a joint venture through equity contributions (generally on a basis proportionate to our ownership interests), advances or partner loans, although such fundings are not typically required contractually or otherwise.


16




Risks Related to Federal Income Tax Laws

The Company's failure to qualify as a REIT could subject our earnings to corporate level taxation.

We believe that we have operated and intend to operate in a manner that permits the Company to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. However, we cannot assure you that the Company has qualified or will remain qualified as a REIT. If in any taxable year the Company were to fail to qualify as a REIT and certain statutory relief provisions were not applicable, the Company would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. The Company's failure to qualify for taxation as a REIT would have a material adverse effect on the market price and marketability of our securities.

The Company is required by law to make distributions to our shareholders.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment associated with the Company's qualification as a REIT, generally, the Company is required to distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its net taxable income (excluding capital gains) each year. The Company depends upon distributions or other payments from the Operating Partnership to make distributions to the Company's common shareholders. A recent IRS revenue procedure allows the Company to satisfy the REIT income distribution requirement by distributing up to 90% of the dividends on its common shares in the form of additional common shares in lieu of paying dividends entirely in cash. Although we reserve the right to utilize this procedure in the future, we currently have no intent to do so. In the event that the Company pays a portion of a dividend in shares, certain U.S. shareholders would be required to pay income tax on the entire amount of the dividend, including the portion paid in shares, in which case such shareholders might have to pay the income tax using cash from other sources. If a U.S. shareholder sells the shares it receives as a dividend in order to pay this income tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our shares at the time of the sale.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect our shareholders.

Future changes to tax laws may adversely affect the taxation of the REIT, its subsidiaries or its shareholders. These changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets.

These potential changes could generally result in REIT’s having fewer tax advantages, and may lead REIT’s to determine that it would be more advantageous to elect to be taxed, for federal income tax purposes, as a corporation.

Not all states automatically conform to changes in the Internal Revenue Code. Some states use the legislative process to decide whether it is in their best interests to conform or not to various provisions of the Code. This could increase the complexity of our compliance efforts, increase compliance costs, and may subject us to additional taxes and audit risk.

Risks Related to our Organizational Structure

The Company depends on distributions from the Operating Partnership to meet its financial obligations, including dividends.

The Company's operations are conducted by the Operating Partnership, and the Company's only significant asset is its interest in the Operating Partnership. As a result, the Company depends upon distributions or other payments from the Operating Partnership in order to meet its financial obligations, including its obligations under any guarantees or to pay dividends or liquidation payments to its common shareholders. As a result, these obligations are effectively subordinated to existing and future liabilities of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is a party to loan agreements with various bank lenders that require the Operating Partnership to comply with various financial and other covenants before it may make distributions to the Company. Although the Operating Partnership presently is in compliance with these covenants, there is no assurance that the Operating Partnership will continue to be in compliance and that it will be able to make distributions to the Company.


1817




Risks Related to Cyber Security

Cyber-attacks or acts of cyber-terrorism could disrupt our business operations and information technology systems or result in the loss or exposure of confidential or sensitive customer, employee or Company information.

Our business operations and information technology systems may be attacked by individuals or organizations intending to disrupt our business operations and information technology systems, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. We use information technology systems to manage our outlet centers and other business processes. Disruption of those systems could adversely impact our ability to operate our business to provide timely service to our customers and maintain our relationships with our tenants. Accordingly, if such an attack or act of terrorism were to occur, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected. In addition, we use our information technology systems to protect confidential or sensitive customer, employee and Company information developed and maintained in the normal course of our business. Any attack on such systems that would result in the unauthorized release or loss of customer, employee or other confidential or sensitive data could have a material adverse effect on our business reputation, increase our costs and expose us to additional material legal claims and liability. As a result, if such an attack or act of terrorism were to occur, our operations and financial results and our share price could be adversely affected.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There are no unresolved staff comments from the Commission for either the Company or the Operating Partnership.


18




ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

As of February 1, 2016,2017, our consolidated portfolio consisted of 3336 outlet centers totaling 11.512.7 million square feet located in 2022 states. We own interests in nineeight other outlet centers totaling approximately 2.72.3 million square feet through unconsolidated joint ventures, including four outlet centers in Canada. Our consolidated outlet centers range in size from 82,161 to 749,074 square feet. The outlet centers are generally located near tourist destinations or along major interstate highways to provide visibility and accessibility to potential customers.

We believe that the outlet centers are well diversified geographically and by tenant and that we are not dependent upon any single property or tenant. The outlet center in Deer Park, New York is the only property that comprises 10% or more of our consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2015.2016. No property comprises more than 10% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. See "Properties - Significant Property" for further details.

We have an ongoing strategy of acquiring outlet centers, developing new outlet centers and expanding existing outlet centers. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of the cost of such programs and the sources of financing thereof.


19



As of February 1, 2016,2017, of the 3336 outlet centers in our consolidated portfolio, we own the land underlying 2629 and have ground leases on seven. The following table sets forth information about the land leases on which all or a portion of the outlet centers are located:
Outlet Center Acres Expiration Expiration including renewal terms
Myrtle Beach Hwy 17, SC 40.0
 2027 2096
Atlantic City, NJ 21.3
 2101 2101
Ocean City, MD 18.5
 2084 2084
Sevierville, TN 43.6
 2086 2086
Riverhead, NY 47.0
 2019 2039
Mashantucket, CT (Foxwoods) 8.1
 2040 2090
Rehoboth Beach, DE 2.7
 2044 
(1) 
(1)Lease may be renewed at our option for additional terms of twenty years each.

Generally, our leases with our outlet center tenants typically have an initial term that ranges from 5 to 10 years and provide for the payment of fixed monthly rent in advance. There are often contractual base rent increases during the initial term of the lease. In addition, the rental payments are customarily subject to upward adjustments based upon tenant sales volume. Most leases provide for payment by the tenant of real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance, advertising and promotion expenses incurred by the applicable outlet center. As a result, the majority of our operating expenses for the outlet centers are borne by the tenants.


19




The following table summarizes certain information with respect to our consolidated outlet centers as of February 1, 2016:2017:
State 
Number of
Outlet Centers
 
Square
Feet
 
%
of Square Feet
 
Number of
Outlet Centers
 
Square
Feet
 
%
of Square Feet
South Carolina 5
 1,598,375
 14 5
 1,598,790
 13
New York 2
 1,478,808
 13 2
 1,478,780
 12
Georgia 3
 1,117,567
 9
Pennsylvania 3
 874,460
 7 3
 849,873
 7
Georgia 2
 692,478
 6
Michigan 2
 671,877
 6 2
 671,539
 5
Texas 2
 643,497
 6 2
 649,556
 5
Connecticut 2
 601,512
 5 2
 601,512
 5
Alabama 1
 556,677
 4
Delaware 1
 565,707
 5 1
 556,409
 4
Alabama 1
 557,014
 5
North Carolina 3
 505,123
 4 3
 505,123
 4
New Jersey 1
 489,706
 4 1
 489,706
 4
Tennessee 1
 448,335
 4 1
 448,335
 3
Ohio 1
 411,776
 3 1
 411,830
 3
Arizona 1
 407,673
 3
Florida 1
 349,402
 3
Missouri 1
 329,861
 3
Louisiana 1
 321,066
 3
Mississippi 1
 320,334
 3 1
 320,337
 2
Missouri 1
 329,861
 3
Utah 1
 319,661
 3 1
 319,661
 2
Louisiana 1
 318,666
 3
Iowa 1
 276,331
 2 1
 276,331
 2
New Hampshire 1
 245,698
 2 1
 245,698
 2
Maryland 1
 198,840
 2 1
 198,800
 2
Total 33
 11,548,059
 100 36
 12,704,526
 100


20




The following table summarizes certain information with respect to our existing outlet centers in which we have an ownership interest as of February 1, 2016.2017. Except as noted, all properties are fee owned:
Location Legal Ownership % Square Feet % Occupied  Legal Ownership % Square Feet % Occupied 
Consolidated Outlet Centers            
Deer Park, New York 100
 749,074
 94  100
 749,074
 97 
Riverhead, New York (1)
 100
 729,734
 98  100
 729,706
 97 
Foley, Alabama 100
 556,677
 99 
Rehoboth Beach, Delaware (1)
 100
 565,707
 98  100
 556,409
 95 
Foley, Alabama 100
 557,014
 94 
Atlantic City, New Jersey (1) (4)
 99
 489,706
 91  99
 489,706
 89 
San Marcos, Texas 100
 465,697
 98  100
 471,756
 96 
Sevierville, Tennessee (1)
 100
 448,335
 99  100
 448,335
 100 
Myrtle Beach Hwy 501, South Carolina 100
 425,247
 95  100
 425,247
 95 
Savannah, Georgia 100
 425,089
 98 
Jeffersonville, Ohio 100
 411,776
 99  100
 411,830
 92 
Glendale, Arizona (Westgate) 100
 407,673
 99 
Myrtle Beach Hwy 17, South Carolina (1)
 100
 402,797
 99  100
 403,192
 98 
Charleston, South Carolina 100
 382,117
 99  100
 382,117
 96 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 100
 372,958
 100  100
 372,958
 99 
Commerce, Georgia 100
 371,408
 99  100
 371,408
 98 
Grand Rapids, Michigan 100
 351,988
 94  100
 357,080
 96 
Daytona Beach, Florida 100
 349,402
 96 
Branson, Missouri 100
 329,861
 99  100
 329,861
 100 
Locust Grove, Georgia 100
 321,070
 99  100
 321,070
 98 
Gonzales, Louisiana 100
 321,066
 99 
Southaven, Mississippi (2) (4)
 50
 320,334
 96  50
 320,337
 94 
Howell, Michigan 100
 319,889
 92 
Park City, Utah 100
 319,661
 100  100
 319,661
 100 
Mebane, North Carolina 100
 318,910
 99  100
 318,910
 98 
Gonzales, Louisiana 100
 318,666
 99 
Howell, Michigan 100
 314,459
 95 
Mashantucket, Connecticut (Foxwoods) (1) (2) (4)
 67
 311,614
 94  67
 311,614
 96 
Westbrook, Connecticut 100
 289,898
 94  100
 289,898
 86 
Williamsburg, Iowa 100
 276,331
 96  100
 276,331
 99 
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 100
 254,002
 96 
Hershey, Pennsylvania 100
 247,500
 99  100
 247,500
 100 
Tilton, New Hampshire 100
 245,698
 97  100
 245,698
 98 
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 100
 229,415
 97 
Hilton Head II, South Carolina 100
 206,544
 95  100
 206,564
 100 
Ocean City, Maryland (1)
 100
 198,840
 79  100
 198,800
 80 
Hilton Head I, South Carolina 100
 181,670
 97  100
 181,670
 100 
Terrell, Texas 100
 177,800
 96  100
 177,800
 96 
Blowing Rock, North Carolina 100
 104,052
 100  100
 104,052
 98 
Nags Head, North Carolina 100
 82,161
 97  100
 82,161
 96 
Total   11,548,059
 97
(3) 
   12,704,526
 97
(3) 
(1)These properties or a portion thereof are subject to a ground lease.
(2)Based on capital contribution and distribution provisions in the joint venture agreement, we expect our economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage. We currently receive substantially all the economic interest of the property.
(3)Excludes the occupancy rate at our Foxwoods, Grand Rapids and Southaven centersDaytona Beach center which opened during the second, thirdfourth quarter of 2016 and fourth quarters of 2015, respectively, and havehas not yet stabilized.
(4)Property encumbered by mortgage. See notenotes 8 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further detaildetails of our debt obligations.



21


21



Location Legal Ownership % Square Feet % Occupied Legal Ownership % Square Feet % Occupied 
Unconsolidated joint venture properties            
Charlotte, North Carolina(1) 50
 397,836
 98 50
 397,844
 98 
Glendale, Arizona (Westgate) 58
 410,664
 96
Columbus, Ohio (1)
 50
 355,220
 94 
Texas City, Texas (Galveston/Houston)(1) 50
 352,705
 99 50
 352,705
 99 
Savannah, Georgia 50
(1) 
377,286
 98
National Harbor, Maryland 50
 338,786
 99
National Harbor, Maryland (1)
 50
 341,156
 97 
Ottawa, Ontario 50
 316,494
 97 
Cookstown, Ontario 50
 308,745
 99 50
 307,789
 97 
Ottawa, Ontario(2)
 50
 284,244
 97
Bromont, Quebec 50
 161,449
 75 50
 161,307
 69 
Saint-Sauveur, Quebec 50
 115,771
 97
Saint-Sauveur, Quebec (1)
 50
 115,771
 83 
Total   2,747,486
 96   2,348,286
 95
(2) 
(1)Based on capital contribution and distribution provisions inProperty encumbered by mortgage. See note 8, to the joint venture agreement, we expect our economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than indicated in the Tanger Ownership column, which states our legal interest in this venture. As of February 1, 2016, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidationconsolidated financial statements for further details of our investment based on depreciated book value, our estimated economic interest in the venture was approximately 98%. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from gains or losses of asset sales.debt obligations.
(2)Excludes square feet to be completedthe occupancy rate at our Columbus center which opened during the second quarter of 2016 and turned over to an anchor tenant at a later date.has not yet stabilized.

Lease Expirations

The following table sets forth, as of February 1, 2016,2017, scheduled lease expirations for our consolidated outlet centers, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options:
Year No. of Leases Expiring 
Approx. Square Feet (in 000's)(1) 
 Average Annualized Base Rent per sq. ft 
Annualized Base Rent
   (in 000's)(2)
 % of Gross Annualized Base Rent Represented by Expiring Leases No. of Leases Expiring 
Approx. Square Feet (in 000's)(1) 
 Average Annualized Base Rent per sq. ft 
Annualized Base Rent
   (in 000's)(2)
 % of Gross Annualized Base Rent Represented by Expiring Leases
2016 194
 785
 $23.01
 $18,061
 7
2017 308
 1,396
 22.37
 31,233
 12 237
 1,015
 $21.71
 $22,037
 7
2018 328
 1,560
 25.39
 39,613
 16 344
 1,638
 24.66
 40,389
 13
2019 224
 1,002
 27.11
 27,163
 10 252
 1,120
 25.63
 28,707
 11
2020 243
 1,385
 21.30
 29,507
 11 255
 1,403
 22.26
 31,224
 10
2021 208
 1,088
 21.85
 23,771
 9 275
 1,439
 22.44
 32,288
 11
2022 136
 528
 30.72
 16,221
 6 211
 871
 28.24
 24,594
 8
2023 143
 634
 26.02
 16,498
 6 157
 700
 25.46
 17,825
 6
2024 129
 521
 32.74
 17,057
 6 141
 568
 33.60
 19,086
 6
2025 249
 1,070
 28.46
 30,452
 11 297
 1,307
 31.01
 40,524
 14
2026 and after 102
 716
 23.46
 16,796
 6
2026 240
 1,013
 27.89
 28,257
 9
2027 and after 72
 605
 24.12
 14,593
 5
 2,264
 10,685
 $24.93
 $266,372
 100 2,481
 11,679
 $25.65
 $299,524
 100
(1)Excludes leases that have been entered into but which tenant has not yet taken possession, vacant suites, space under construction, temporary leases and month-to-month leases totaling in the aggregate approximately 863,0001.0 million square feet.
(2)Annualized base rent is defined as the minimum monthly payments due as of February 1, 20162017 annualized, excluding periodic contractual fixed increases and rents calculated based on a percentage of tenants' sales. The annualized base rent disclosed in the table above includes all concessions, abatements and reimbursements of rent to tenants.


22




Based on current market base rental rates, we believe we will achieve overall positive increases in our average base rental income for leases expiring in 2016.2017. However, changes in base rental income associated with individual signed leases on comparable spaces may be positive or negative, and we can provide no assurance that the base rents on new leases will continue to increase from current levels, if at all.

Base Rents and Occupancy Rates

The following table sets forth our year end occupancy and average annual base rent per square foot during each of the last five calendar years for our consolidated properties:

 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Occupancy 97% 98% 99% 99% 99% 98% 97% 98% 99% 99%
Average annual base rent per square foot (1)
 $25.19
 $23.78
 $22.98
 $21.94
 $21.05
 $26.10
 $25.19
 $23.78
 $22.98
 $21.94
(1)Average annual base rent per square foot is calculated on a straight-line basis including the effects of inducements and rent concessions.

The following table sets forth information regarding the expiring leases for our consolidated outlet centers during each of the last five calendar years:

 Total Expiring 
Renewed by Existing
Tenants
 Total Expiring 
Renewed by Existing
Tenants
Year 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 
% of
Total Outlet Center Square Feet (1)
 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 
% of
Expiring Square Feet
 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 
% of
Total Outlet Center Square Feet (1)
 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 
% of
Expiring Square Feet
2015(2)
 1,532
 13 1,282
 84
2014(3)
 1,613
 14 1,241
 77
2016(2)
 1,440
 12 1,223
 85
2015(3)
 1,532
 13 1,282
 84
2014(4)
 1,613
 14 1,241
 77
2013 1,950
 18 1,574
 81 1,950
 18 1,574
 81
2012 1,814
 17 1,536
 85 1,814
 17 1,536
 85
2011 1,771
 18 1,459
 82
(1)Represents the percentage of total square footage at the beginning of each year that is scheduled to expire during the respective year.
(2)Excludes Fort Myers outlet center, which was sold in January 2016.
(3)Excludes the outlet centers in Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch, and Barstow, which were sold during 2015.
(3)(4)Excludes the Lincoln City outlet center, which was sold in 2014.


23




The following table sets forth the weighted average base rental rate increases per square foot on a straight-line basis (includes periodic, contractual fixed rent increases) for our consolidated outlet centers upon re-leasing stores that were turned over or renewed during each of the last five calendar years:
 Renewals of Existing Leases 
Stores Re-leased to New Tenants (1)
 Renewals of Existing Leases 
Stores Re-leased to New Tenants (1)
   Average Annualized Base Rent   Average Annualized Base Rent   Average Annualized Base Rent   Average Annualized Base Rent
   ($ per sq. ft.)   ($ per sq. ft.)   ($ per sq. ft.)   ($ per sq. ft.)
Year 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Expiring New 
%
Increase
 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Expiring New % Increase 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Expiring New 
%
Increase
 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Expiring New % Increase
2015(2)
 1,282
 $21.77
 $26.06
 20 444
 $24.33
 $31.48
 29
2014(3)
 1,241
 19.97
 23.38
 17 470
 24.20
 32.93
 36
2016(2)
 1,223
 $22.60
 $26.59
 18 384
 $25.62
 $32.64
 27
2015(3)
 1,282
 21.77
 26.06
 20 444
 24.33
 31.48
 29
2014(4)
 1,241
 19.97
 23.38
 17 470
 24.20
 32.93
 36
2013 1,574
 20.09
 23.96
 19 510
 22.19
 30.57
 38 1,574
 20.09
 23.96
 19 510
 22.19
 30.57
 38
2012 1,536
 18.70
 21.75
 16 450
 20.60
 31.72
 54 1,536
 18.70
 21.75
 16 450
 20.60
 31.72
 54
2011 1,459
 18.16
 20.54
 13 548
 18.82
 28.24
 50
(1)The square footage released to new tenants for 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012 and 2011 contains 149,440,93,000 149,000, 207,000, 224,000 137,000, and 172,000,137,000, respectively, that was released to new tenants upon expiration of an existing lease during the respective year.
(2)Excludes Fort Myers outlet center, which was sold in January 2016 and includes the Westgate and Savannah outlet centers, which are both now consolidated due to the acquisition of the other joint venture partners' interests during June 2016 and August 2016, respectively.
(3)Excludes the outlet centers in Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch, and Barstow, which were sold during 2015.
(3)(4)Excludes the Lincoln City outlet center, which was sold in 2014.

Occupancy Costs

We believe that our ratio of average tenant occupancy cost (which includes base rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance, advertising and promotions) to average sales per square foot is low relative to other forms of retail distribution. The following table sets forth for tenants that report sales, for each of the last five calendar years, tenant occupancy costs per square foot as a percentage of reported tenant sales per square foot for our consolidated outlet centers:

Year 
Occupancy Costs as a
% of Tenant Sales
 
Occupancy Costs as a
% of Tenant Sales
2016 9.9
2015 9.3
 9.3
2014 8.9
 8.9
2013 8.6
 8.6
2012 8.4
 8.4
2011 8.4


24




Tenants
The following table sets forth certain information for our consolidated outlet centers with respect to our ten largest tenants and their store concepts as of February 1, 2016:2017:
Tenant Number of Stores Square Feet % of Total Square Feet Number of Stores Square Feet % of Total Square Feet
The Gap, Inc.:          
Old Navy 24
 359,562
 3.1 27
 399,890
 3.1
GAP 30
 283,451
 2.5 33
 307,134
 2.4
Banana Republic 29
 240,855
 2.1 32
 263,430
 2.1
 83
 883,868
 7.7 92
 970,454
 7.6
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.:          
Dress Barn 27
 221,026
 1.9 29
 233,626
 1.8
Loft 27
 180,985
 1.6 30
 199,245
 1.6
Ann Taylor 20
 131,294
 1.1 23
 144,806
 1.1
Lane Bryant 22
 115,526
 1.0 25
 129,716
 1.0
Justice 26
 111,229
 1.0 28
 120,416
 1.0
Maurice's 10
 48,461
 0.4 12
 58,561
 0.5
Dress Barn Woman 1
 3,600
 * 1
 3,600
 *
 133
 812,121
 7.0 148
 889,970
 7.0
Nike, Inc.:          
Nike 25
 353,096
 3.1 28
 394,779
 3.1
Converse 10
 32,625
 0.3 13
 43,125
 0.4
Hurley 1
 2,133
 * 1
 2,133
 *
 36
 387,854
 3.4 42
 440,037
 3.5
PVH Corp.:          
Tommy Hilfiger 28
 203,984
 1.8 30
 226,074
 1.8
Van Heusen 21
 86,122
 0.7 23
 94,099
 0.7
Calvin Klein, Inc. 11
 71,119
 0.6 12
 80,119
 0.6
Tommy Kids 1
 3,090
 *
 61
 364,315
 3.1 65
 400,292
 3.1
V. F. Corporation:          
VF Outlet 11
 204,570
 1.8 12
 220,240
 1.7
Nautica 11
 56,630
 0.5 10
 53,430
 0.4
The North Face 6
 44,445
 0.4
Timberland 8
 41,426
 0.4 8
 41,426
 0.3
The North Face 2
 16,219
 0.1
Vans 4
 13,000
 0.1 7
 27,472
 0.2
 36
 331,845
 2.9 43
 387,013
 3.0
Ralph Lauren Corporation:          
Polo Ralph Lauren 26
 276,845
 2.4 30
 326,159
 2.6
Polo Children 5
 24,909
 0.2 4
 17,575
 0.1
Polo Ralph Lauren Big & Tall 3
 15,262
 0.1 3
 15,262
 0.1
Lauren Ralph Lauren 1
 6,250
 0.1 1
 6,250
 0.1
 35
 323,266
 2.8 38
 365,246
 2.9
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.:          
Bass 30
 177,768
 1.5 32
 180,973
 1.4
Wilson's Leather 34
 128,388
 1.1 37
 137,398
 1.1
 64
 306,156
 2.6 69
 318,371
 2.5
Carter's Inc.:          
OshKosh B'Gosh 32
 143,945
 1.2
Carter's 29
 131,534
 1.1 30
 128,661
 1.0
OshKosh B'Gosh 28
 122,825
 1.1
 57
 254,359
 2.2 62
 272,606
 2.2
Adidas AG:     
Reebok 18
 134,970
 1.2
Adidas 17
 110,504
 1.0
Taylor Made 1
 3,000
 *
H&M Group:     
H&M 13
 271,854
 2.1
 36
 248,474
 2.2 13
 271,854
 2.1
Hanes Brands:     
Hanesbrands 30
 192,894
 1.7
Maidenform 7
 15,337
 0.1
Champion 2
 8,640
 0.1
Under Armour, Inc.:     
Under Armour 29
 235,374
 1.9
Under Armour Kids 3
 10,022
 0.1
 39
 216,871
 1.9 32
 245,396
 2.0
          
Total of all tenants listed in table 580

4,129,129

35.8 604

4,561,239

35.9
* Less than 0.1%.

25




Significant Properties

The Deer Park, New York outlet center is the only property that comprises 10% or more of our consolidated total assets. No property comprises more than 10% of our consolidated revenues. In August 2013, we acquired an additional one-third ownership interest in the property, bringing our total ownership to a two-thirds interest, and then restructured certain aspects of the remaining one-third ownership of the property, the effects of which gave us a controlling ownership interest. With the acquisition of a controlling ownership interest, we have consolidated Deer Park in our balance sheet and statements of operations since the acquisition date. Previously, Deer Park was reported within our unconsolidated portfolio of properties.

Tenants at the Deer Park outlet center principally conduct retail sales operations. The following table shows occupancy and certain base rental information related to this property as of December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013:2014:
Deer Park Square Feet 2015 2014 2013 Square Feet 2016 2015 2014
Outlet Center Occupancy 749,074
 95% 95% 95% 749,074
 97% 95% 95%
                
Average base rental rates per weighted average square foot (1)
   $30.34
 $29.45
 $29.73
   $30.24
 $30.34
 $29.45
(1)Note that outlet center was acquired during August 2013. Represents average base rental rates per weighted average square foot since the acquisition date.

Depreciation on the outlet centers is computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We generally use estimated lives ranging from 33 years for buildings, 15 years for land improvements and 7 years for equipment. Expenditures for ordinary repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred while significant renovations and improvements, including tenant finishing allowances, which improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life. Real estate taxes assessed on this outlet center during 20152016 amounted to $4.4$4.6 million. Real estate taxes for 20162017 are estimated to be approximately $4.9$4.8 million.

The following table sets forth, as of February 1, 2016,2017, scheduled lease expirations for the Deer Park outlet center assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal options:
Year 
No. of
Leases
Expiring (1)
 
Square Feet
(in 000's) (1)
 
Annualized
Base Rent
per Square Foot
 
Annualized
Base Rent
    (in 000's) (2)
 
% of Gross
Annualized
Base Rent
Represented
by Expiring
Leases
 
No. of
Leases
Expiring (1)
 
Square Feet
(in 000's) (1)
 
Annualized
Base Rent
per Square Foot
 
Annualized
Base Rent
    (in 000's) (2)
 
% of Gross
Annualized
Base Rent
Represented
by Expiring
Leases
2016 11
 47
 $33.36
 $1,568
 7
2017 4
 11
 25.73
 283
 2
 6
 15
 $23.53
 $353
 1
2018 26
 144
 33.21
 4,782
 23
 25
 149
 31.01
 4,620
 21
2019 24
 136
 38.74
 5,269
 25
 22
 133
 37.94
 5,046
 23
2020 3
 13
 43.85
 570
 3
 3
 13
 44.23
 575
 3
2021 3
 11
 43.45
 478
 2
 8
 48
 48.17
 2,312
 11
2022 3
 13
 37.23
 484
 2
 4
 15
 37.80
 567
 3
2023 7
 54
 21.15
 1,142
 5
 7
 54
 21.72
 1,173
 5
2024 7
 29
 36.83
 1,068
 5
 7
 29
 37.86
 1,098
 5
2025 6
 26
 20.65
 537
 3
 6
 26
 22.35
 581
 3
2026 and thereafter 5
 194
 24.51
 4,755
 23
2026 6
 17
 24.82
 422
 2
2027 and thereafter 7
 196
 25.79
 5,054
 23
Total 99
 678
 $30.88
 $20,936
 100% 101
 695
 $31.37
 $21,801
 100%
(1)
Excludes leases that have been entered into but which tenant has not taken possession, vacant suites, temporary leases and month-to-month leases totaling in the aggregate approximately 71,00054,000 square feet.
(2)
Annualized base rent is defined as the minimum monthly payments due as of February 1, 2016,2017, excluding periodic contractual fixed increases and rents calculated based on a percentage of tenants' sales. The annualized base rent disclosed in the table above includes all concessions, abatements and reimbursements of rent to tenants.


26




ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company and the Operating Partnership are, from time to time, engaged in a variety of legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

On July 14, 2016, a lawsuit was filed by a local business owner in the Superior Court of New Jersey alleging that agreements that establish the property tax liability of certain of our subsidiaries violate the New Jersey Constitution and are unauthorized under New Jersey law. The plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that the agreements were unenforceable.  The lawsuit was dismissed by the court on January 30, 2017.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Executive Officers of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company's executive officers. The Operating Partnership does not have executive officers:
NAME AGE POSITION
Steven B. Tanger 6768 Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.57Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
Thomas E. McDonough 5859 Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer
Chad D. Perry 4445 Executive Vice President - General Counsel and Secretary
James F. Williams52Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
Carrie A. Geldner 5354 Senior Vice President - Chief Marketing Officer
Manuel O. Jessup60Senior Vice President - Human Resources
Lisa J. Morrison 5657 Senior Vice President - Leasing
Virginia R. Summerell 5758 Senior Vice President of Finance - Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
James F. Williams51Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer
Charles A. Worsham 4445 Senior Vice President - Construction and Development

The following is a biographical summary of the experience of our executive officers:

Steven B. Tanger. Mr. Tanger is a director of the Company and was named President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2009. Mr. Tanger served as President and Chief Operating Officer from January 1, 1995 to December 2008. Previously, Mr. Tanger served as Executive Vice President from 1986 to December 1994. He has been with Tanger related companies for most of his professional career, having served as Executive Vice President of Tanger/Creighton for 10 years. Mr. Tanger is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Stanford University School of Business Executive Program. Mr. Tanger provides an insider's perspective in Board discussions about the business and strategic direction of the Company and has experience in all aspects of the Company's business.

Frank C. Marchisello, Jr. Mr. Marchisello was named Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer in April 2003. Previously he was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 1999 after being named Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 1994. He served as Chief Accounting Officer from January 1993 to November 1994. He was employed by Gilliam, Coble & Moser, certified public accountants, from 1981 to 1992, the last six years of which he was a partner of the firm in charge of various real estate clients. Mr. Marchisello is responsible for the Company's financial reporting processes, as well as supervisory responsibility over the senior officers that oversee the Company's accounting, finance, investor relations and information systems functions. Mr. Marchisello is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a certified public accountant.

27



Thomas E. McDonough. Mr. McDonough was named Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer in August 2011. He joined the Company in August 2010 as Executive Vice President of Operations. Previously, he was the Co-Founder and Principal of MHF Real Estate Group, a real estate asset management firm, from September 2009 to August 2010. He served as Chief Investment Officer and was a member of the Investment Committee at Equity One, Inc. from July 2007 to April 2009. From April 2006 to July 2007, Mr. McDonough was a partner at Kahl & Goveia, and from February 1997 to April 2006, he was employed by Regency Centers Corp., and its predecessor, Pacific Retail Trust, as the national director of acquisitions and dispositions. Previously, from July 1984 to January 1997, Mr. McDonough served in various capacities, including partner and principal, with Trammell Crow Company. Mr. McDonough has supervisory responsibility over the senior officers that oversee the Company's operations, construction and development, leasing and marketing functions. Mr. McDonough is a graduate of Stanford University and holds an MBA degree from Harvard Business School.



27




Chad D. Perry. Mr. Perry joined the Company in December 2011 as Executive Vice President - General Counsel and was additionally named Secretary in May 2012. Previously, heHe was Executive Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of LPL Financial Corporation from May 2006 to December 2011. From January 2005 to April 2006,Previously, he served aswas Senior Corporate Counsel of EMC Corporation. Previously, Mr. Perry was a Senior Associate ofbegan his legal career with international law firm Ropes & Gray from September 1997 to January 2005.LLP. His responsibilities include corporate governance, compliance, and other legal matters, as well as management of outside counsel relationships and the Company’sCompany's in house legal department. Mr. Perry is a graduate of Princeton University, and earned a J.D. from Columbia University, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. He is a member of both the Massachusetts and California bar associations.

James F. Williams. Mr. Williams was named Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer in May 2016. He joined the Company in September 1993, served as Controller from January 1995 to March 2015 and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2013 to May 2016. He was also named Assistant Vice President in January 1997, Vice President in April 2004, and Senior Vice President in February 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williams was the Financial Reporting Manager of Guilford Mills, Inc. from April 1991 to September 1993 and was employed by Arthur Andersen from 1987 to 1991. He is responsible for the Company's financial reporting processes, as well as supervisory responsibility over the senior officers that oversee the Company's accounting, finance, investor relations and information systems functions. Mr. Williams is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a certified public accountant.

Carrie A. Geldner. Ms. Geldner was named Senior Vice President - Chief Marketing Officer in January 2012. Previously, she held the positions of Senior Vice President - Marketing from May 2000 to January 2012, Vice President - Marketing from September 1996 to May 2000 and Assistant Vice President - Marketing from December 1995 to September 1996. Prior to joining Tanger, Ms. Geldner was with Prime Retail, L.P. for 4 years where she served as Regional Marketing Director responsible for coordinating and directing marketing for five outlet centers in the southeast region. Previously, Ms. Geldner was Marketing Manager for North Hills, Inc. for five years and also served in the same role for the Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. for two years. Her major responsibilities include managing the Company's marketing department and developing and overseeing implementation of all corporate and field marketing programs. Ms. Geldner is a graduate of East Carolina University.

Manuel O. Jessup. Mr. Jessup joined the Company as Senior Vice President of Human Resources in September 2012. Previously, Mr. Jessup worked with Fine Mark National Bank & Trust as the Executive Vice President of Human Resources from October 2010 to July 2012. From September 2006 to August 2010, he served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources and later Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Chico's FAS, Inc. Previously, Mr. Jessup was employed by Sara Lee Branded Apparel from September 1985 through August 2006. While at Sara Lee Branded Apparel, Mr. Jessup held numerous leadership roles in human resources, including Vice President of Human Resources, with responsibility for domestic and international operations in Asia and Latin America. His responsibilities include oversight and supervision of the Company's Human Resources function. Mr. Jessup is a graduate of the University of South Carolina and holds an MBA from Wake Forest University Babcock School of Business.

Lisa J. Morrison. Ms. Morrison was named Senior Vice President - Leasing in August 2004. Previously, she held the positions of Vice President - Leasing from May 2001 to August 2004, Assistant Vice President of Leasing from August 2000 to May 2001 and Director of Leasing from April 1999 until August 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Morrison was employed by the Taubman Company and Trizec Properties, Inc. where she served as a leasing agent. Previously, she was a marketing coordinator for Nelson Ross Properties. Her major responsibilities include managing the leasing strategies for our operating properties, as well as expansions and new developments. She also oversees the leasing personnel and the merchandising and occupancy for Tanger properties. Ms. Morrison is a graduate of the University of Detroit and holds an MA degree from Michigan State University.
 

28



Virginia R. Summerell. Ms. Summerell was named Senior Vice President of Finance - Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Company in May 2011. Since joining the Company in August 1992, she has held various positions including Vice President, Treasurer, Assistant Secretary and Director of Finance. Her major responsibilities include oversight of corporate and project finance transactions, developing and maintaining banking relationships, management of treasury systems and the supervision of the Company's Credit Department and Investor Relations Department. Prior to joining the Company, she served as a Vice President and in other capacities at Bank of America and its predecessors in Real Estate and Corporate Lending for nine years. Ms. Summerell is a graduate of Davidson College and holds an MBA from Wake Forest University Babcock School of Business.

James F. Williams. Mr. Williams was named Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer in March 2013. Mr. Williams joined the Company in September 1993, was named Controller in January 1995 and was also named Assistant Vice President in January 1997, Vice President in April 2004, and Senior Vice President in February 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williams was the Financial Reporting Manager of Guilford Mills, Inc. from April 1991 to September 1993 and was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from 1987 to 1991. His major responsibilities include oversight and supervision of the Company's accounting and financial reporting functions. Mr. Williams is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a certified public accountant.

Charles A. Worsham. Mr. Worsham was named Senior Vice President - Construction and Development in May 2014 and previously held the position of Vice President - Development since April 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Worsham was employed by DDR, Corp. for 8 years where he served as Vice President of Development from 2006 to 2010 and Development Director from 2003 to 2006 with a focus on executing  the redevelopment and expansion program. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Worsham served as Real Estate and Development Manager for Intown Suites where he managed the development of hotel properties in various geographic regions. His major responsibilities include implementing the Company’s real estate development program and oversight of construction personnel. Mr. Worsham is a graduate of Tennessee Technological University and holds an MBA degree in Real Estate from Georgia State University.


2928




PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Market Information

The common shares commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange on May 28, 1993. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, during the periods indicated:

2016 High Low Common Dividends Paid Special Dividends 
First Quarter $36.51
 $29.46
 $0.2850
 $
 
Second Quarter 40.22
 33.71
 0.3250
 
 
Third Quarter 42.20
 38.01
 0.3250
 
 
Fourth Quarter 38.77
 32.71
 0.3250
 
 
Year 2016 $42.20
 $29.46
 $1.2600
 $
 
         
2015 High Low Common Dividends PaidSpecial Dividends  High Low Common Dividends Paid Special Dividends 
First Quarter $40.80
 $33.79
 $0.2400
$
  $40.80
 $33.79
 $0.2400
 $
 
Second Quarter 36.26
 31.65
 0.2850

  36.26
 31.65
 0.2850
 
 
Third Quarter 33.93
 30.30
 0.2850

  33.93
 30.30
 0.2850
 
 
Fourth Quarter 36.10
 31.55
 0.2850
0.2100
(1) 
 36.10
 31.55
 0.2850
 0.2100
(1) 
Year 2015 $40.80
 $30.30
 $1.0950
$0.2100
  $40.80
 $30.30
 $1.0950
 $0.2100
 
       
2014 High Low Common Dividends PaidSpecial Dividends 
First Quarter $35.38
 $31.86
 $0.2250
$
 
Second Quarter 36.77
 34.73
 0.2400

 
Third Quarter 35.94
 32.39
 0.2400

 
Fourth Quarter 37.96
 32.53
 0.2400

 
Year 2014 $37.96
 $31.86
 $0.9450
$
 
(1)  
Paid on January 15, 2016 to holders of record onas of December 31, 2015.

Holders

As of February 1, 2015,2017, there were approximately 429408 common shareholders of record.

Share Repurchases

For certain restricted common shares that vested during December 2015 and 2014,the fourth quarter of 2016 we withheld shares with value equivalent to the employees' minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes, and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total number of shares withheld during the fourth quarter were 31,863 and 412,239 for 2015 and 2014, respectively,333 shares and were based on the value of the restricted common shares on the vesting date as determined by our closing share price on the day prior to the vesting date.

Dividends

The Company operates in a manner intended to enable it to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. A REIT is required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders each year. We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT and to distribute substantially all of our taxable income to our shareholders through the payment of regular quarterly dividends. Certain of our debt agreements limit the payment of dividends such that dividends shall not exceed funds from operations ("FFO"), as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95% of FFO on a cumulative basis. On January 15, 2016, we paid a special dividend to our common shareholders of record on December 31, 2015 in order to ensure we distributed substantially all of our 2015 taxable income to our shareholders.


3029




Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The information required by this Item is set forth in Part III Item 12 of this document.

Performance Graph

The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The following share price performance chart compares our performance to the index of US equity REITs and US retail REITs, both prepared by SNL Financial.

Equity REITs are defined as those that derive more than 75% of their income from equity investments in real estate assets. The SNL equity index includes all publicly traded retail REITs (including malls, shopping centers and other retail REITs) listed on the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE MKT (formerly knowknown as the American Stock Exchange), NASDAQ National Market System or the OTC Market Group.

All share price performance assumes an initial investment of $100 at the beginning of the period and assumes the reinvestment of dividends. Share price performance, presented for the five years ended December 31, 2015,2016, is not necessarily indicative of future results.

3130




  Period Ended  Period Ended
Index12/31/2010
 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/201512/31/2011
 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.100.00
 117.96
 141.31
 135.64
 160.85
 147.74
100.00
 119.80
 114.99
 136.36
 125.24
 141.98
SNL US REIT Equity100.00
 108.33
 130.25
 135.11
 172.25
 177.01
100.00
 120.23
 124.71
 159.00
 163.39
 177.90
SNL US REIT Retail100.00
 110.21
 141.43
 145.89
 186.47
 194.13
100.00
 128.33
 132.38
 169.20
 176.15
 177.95

Tanger Properties Limited Partnership Market Information

There is no established public trading market for the Operating Partnership's common units. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust, owned 95,880,82596,095,891 units of the Operating Partnership and the Non-Company LPs owned 5,052,7435,027,781 units. We made distributions per common unit during 20152016 and 20142015 as follows:
 2015 2014 2016 2015
First Quarter $0.240
 $0.225
 $0.285
 $0.240
Second Quarter 0.285
 0.240
 0.325
 0.285
Third Quarter 0.285
 0.240
 0.325
 0.285
Fourth Quarter 0.285
 0.240
 0.325
 0.285
Dividends per unit $1.095
 $0.945
 $1.260
 $1.095
Special dividends per unit (1)
 0.210
 
 
 0.210
Total dividends per unit $1.305
 $0.945
 $1.260
 $1.305
(1)Paid on January 15, 2016 to holders of record onas of December 31, 2015.




3231




ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.)

The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
 (in thousands, except per share and outlet center data) (in thousands, except per share and outlet center data)
OPERATING DATA                    
Total revenues $439,369
 $418,558
 $384,819
 $357,002
 $315,203
 $465,834
 $439,369
 $418,558
 $384,819
 $357,002
Operating income 144,461
 131,863
 127,705
 109,590
 97,915
 151,277
 144,461
 131,863
 127,705
 109,590
Net income(3)(4)
 222,168
 78,152
 113,321
 56,476
 50,989
 204,329
 222,168
 78,152
 113,321
 56,476
Net income available to common shareholders(3)(4)
 208,792
 72,139
 106,431
 52,444
 43,957
 191,818
 208,792
 72,139
 106,431
 52,444
SHARE DATA                    
Basic:                    
Net income available to common shareholders(1)(2)(3)
 $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $0.57
 $0.53
Net income available to common
shareholders(1)(2)(3)(4)
 $2.02
 $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $0.57
Weighted average common shares 94,698
 93,769
 93,311
 91,733
 83,000
 95,102
 94,698
 93,769
 93,311
 91,733
Diluted: 
                  
Net income available to common shareholders(1)(2)(3)
 $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $0.57
 $0.52
Net income available to common
shareholders(1)(2)(3)(4)
 $2.01
 $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $0.57
Weighted average common shares 94,759
 93,839
 94,247
 92,661
 84,129
 95,345
 94,759
 93,839
 94,247
 92,661
Common dividends (4)(5)
 $1.3050
 $0.9450
 $0.8850
 $0.8300
 $0.7938
 $1.260
 $1.305
 $0.945
 $0.885
 $0.830
BALANCE SHEET DATA                    
Real estate assets, before depreciation $2,513,217
 $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
 $1,947,352
 $1,916,045
 $2,965,907
 $2,513,217
 $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
 $1,947,352
Total assets(6) 2,326,707
 2,097,660
 2,006,456
 1,678,800
 1,633,273
 2,526,214
 2,314,825
 2,085,534
 1,995,638
 1,669,717
Debt(6) 1,563,806
 1,443,194
 1,328,049
 1,093,537
 1,025,542
 1,687,866
 1,551,924
 1,431,068
 1,317,231
 1,084,454
Total equity 606,032
 523,886
 557,595
 513,875
 528,432
 705,441
 606,032
 523,886
 557,595
 513,875
CASH FLOW DATA                    
Cash flows provided by (used in):                    
Operating activities $220,755
 $188,771
 $187,486
 $165,750
 $135,994
 $239,316
 $220,755
 $188,771
 $187,486
 $165,750
Investing activities (221,827) (188,588) (174,226) (147,909) (361,076) (45,501) (221,827) (188,588) (174,226) (147,909)
Financing activities 6,854
 1,977
 (7,072) (15,415) 227,218
 (203,467) 6,854
 1,977
 (7,072) (15,415)
OTHER DATA                    
Square feet open:                    
Consolidated 11,746
 11,346
 11,537
 10,737
 10,724
 12,710
 11,746
 11,346
 11,537
 10,737
Partially-owned (unconsolidated) 2,747
 2,606
 1,719
 2,156
 1,110
 2,348
 2,747
 2,606
 1,719
 2,156
Number of outlet centers:                    
Consolidated 34
 36
 37
 36
 36
 36
 34
 36
 37
 36
Partially-owned (unconsolidated) 9
 9
 7
 7
 3
 8
 9
 9
 7
 7
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2016, income from continuing operations and net income include gains of approximately $95.5 million related to the acquisitions of our other venture partners' equity interests in the Westgate and Savannah joint ventures, a $6.3 million gain on the sale of our Fort Myers, Florida outlet center and the sale of an outparcel at our Hwy 501 outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
(2)For the year ended December 31, 2015, income from continuing operations and net income include a gaingains of approximately $120.4 million onfrom the sale of our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture and on the sale of our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch and Barstow outlet centers.
(2)(3)For the year ended December 31, 2014, income from continuing operations and net income include a $7.5 million gain on the sale of our Lincoln City outlet center and a $13.1 million loss on early extinguishment of debt related to the early redemption of senior notes due November 2015.
(3)(4)For the year ended December 31, 2013, income from continuing operations and net income include a $26.0 million gain on our previously held interest in Deer Park upon the acquisition of an additional one-third interest in August 2013, and the consolidation of Deer Park into our financial statements.2013.
(4)(5)For the year ended December 31, 2015, common dividends include a special dividend paid on January 15, 2016 to holders of record onas of December 31, 2015.
(6)Adjusted for reclassification of debt issuance costs related to the adoption of ASU 2015-03. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

3332




ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)

The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
 (in thousands, except per unit and outlet center data) (in thousands, except per unit and outlet center data)
OPERATING DATA                    
Total revenues $439,369
 $418,558
 $384,819
 $357,002
 $315,203
 $465,834
 $439,369
 $418,558
 $384,819
 $357,002
Operating income 144,461
 131,863
 127,705
 109,590
 97,915
 151,277
 144,461
 131,863
 127,705
 109,590
Net income(3)(4)
 222,168
 78,152
 113,321
 56,476
 50,989
 204,329
 222,168
 78,152
 113,321
 56,476
Net income available to common unitholders(3)(4)
 220,118
 76,175
 112,071
 55,711
 50,313
 202,103
 220,118
 76,175
 112,071
 55,711
UNIT DATA                    
Basic:                    
Net income available to common unitholders(3)(4)
 $2.21
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $0.57
 $0.53
 $2.02
 $2.21
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $0.57
Weighted average common units 99,777
 98,883
 98,193
 97,677
 94,892
 100,155
 99,777
 98,883
 98,193
 97,677
Diluted:                    
Net income available to common unitholders(3)(4)
 $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $0.57
 $0.52
 $2.01
 $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $0.57
Weighted average common units 99,838
 98,953
 99,129
 98,605
 96,021
 100,398
 99,838
 98,953
 99,129
 98,605
Common distributions (4)(5)
 $1.3050
 $0.9450
 $0.8850
 $0.8300
 $0.7938
 $1.260
 $1.305
 $0.945
 $0.885
 $0.830
BALANCE SHEET DATA                    
Real estate assets, before depreciation $2,513,217
 $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
 $1,947,352
 $1,916,045
 $2,965,907
 $2,513,217
 $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
 $1,947,352
Total assets(6) 2,326,036
 2,096,085
 2,005,950
 1,678,326
 1,632,921
 2,525,687
 2,314,154
 2,083,959
 1,995,132
 1,669,243
Debt(6) 1,563,806
 1,443,194
 1,328,049
 1,093,537
 1,025,542
 1,687,866
 1,551,924
 1,431,068
 1,317,231
 1,084,454
Total equity 606,032
 523,886
 557,595
 513,875
 528,432
 705,441
 606,032
 523,886
 557,595
 513,875
CASH FLOW DATA                    
Cash flows provided by (used in):                    
Operating activities $221,818
 $187,959
 $187,269
 $165,738
 $136,053
 $239,299
 $221,818
 $187,959
 $187,269
 $165,738
Investing activities (221,827) (188,588) (174,226) (147,909) (361,076) (45,501) (221,827) (188,588) (174,226) (147,909)
Financing activities 6,854
 1,977
 (7,072) (15,415) 227,218
 (203,467) 6,854
 1,977
 (7,072) (15,415)
OTHER DATA                    
Consolidated 11,746
 11,346
 11,537
 10,737
 10,724
 12,710
 11,746
 11,346
 11,537
 10,737
Partially-owned (unconsolidated) 2,747
 2,606
 1,719
 2,156
 1,110
 2,348
 2,747
 2,606
 1,719
 2,156
Number of outlet centers:                    
Consolidated 34
 36
 37
 36
 36
 36
 34
 36
 37
 36
Partially-owned (unconsolidated) 9
 9
 7
 7
 3
 8
 9
 9
 7
 7
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2016, income from continuing operations and net income include gains of approximately $95.5 million related to the acquisitions of our other venture partners' equity interests in the Westgate and Savannah joint ventures, a $6.3 million gain on the sale of our Fort Myers, Florida outlet center and the sale of an outparcel at our Hwy 501 outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina .
(2)For the year ended December 31, 2015, income from continuing operations and net income include a gaingains of approximately $120.4 million onfrom the sale of our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture and on the sale of our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch and Barstow outlet centers.
(2)(3)For the year ended December 31, 2014, income from continuing operations and net income include a $7.5 million gain on the sale of our Lincoln City outlet center and a $13.1 million loss on early extinguishment of debt related to the early redemption of senior notes due November 2015.
(3)(4)For the year ended December 31, 2013, income from continuing operations and net income include a $26.0 million gain on our previously held interest in Deer Park upon the acquisition of an additional one-third interest in August 2013, and the consolidation of Deer Park into our financial statements.2013.
(4)(5)For the year ended December 31, 2015, common distributionsdividends include a special dividend paid on January 15, 2016 to holders of record onas of December 31, 2015.
(6)Adjusted for reclassification of debt issuance costs related to the adoption of ASU 2015-03. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.


3433




ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statements

Certain statements made in Item 1 - Business and this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 and included this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, beliefs and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe", "expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project", or similar expressions.
Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our: future issuances of equity and debt and the expected use of proceeds from such issuances; potential sales or purchases of outlet centers; anticipated results of operations, liquidity and working capital; new outlet center developments, expansions and renovations; and real estate joint ventures. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect our actual results, performance or achievements. Important factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to: our inability to develop new outlet centers or expand existing outlet centers successfully; risks related to the economic performance and market value of our outlet centers; the relative illiquidity of real property investments; impairment charges affecting our properties; our dispositions of assets may not achieve anticipated results; competition for the acquisition and development of outlet centers, and our inability to complete outlet centers we have identified; environmental regulations affecting our business; risk associated with a possible terrorist activity or other acts or threats of violence and threats to public safety; our dependence on rental income from real property; our dependence on the results of operations of our retailers; the fact that certain of our properties are subject to ownership interests held by third parties, whose interests may conflict with ours; risks related to uninsured losses; the risk that consumer, travel, shopping and spending habits may change; risks associated with our Canadian investments; risks associated with attracting and retaining key personnel; risks associated with debt financing; risk associated with our guarantees of debt for, or other support we may provide to, joint venture properties; our potential failure to qualify as a REIT; our legal obligation to make distributions to our shareholders; legislative or regulatory actions that could adversely affect our shareholders; our dependence on distributions from the Operating Partnership to meet our financial obligations, including dividends; the risk of a cyber-attack or an act of cyber-terrorism and other important factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A - Risk Factors.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the consolidated statements of operations, including trends which might appear, are not necessarily indicative of future operations.



3534




General Overview

As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had 3436 consolidated outlet centers in 2122 states totaling 11.712.7 million square feet. We also had 98 unconsolidated outlet centers in 7 states or provinces totaling 2.72.3 million square feet.feet, including 4 outlet centers in Canada. The table below details our acquisitions, new developments, expansions and dispositions of consolidated and unconsolidated outlet centers that significantly impacted our results of operations and liquidity from January 1, 20132014 to December 31, 2015:2016:
Outlet Center Quarter Acquired/Open/Disposed/Demolished Consolidated Outlet Center Square Feet (in thousands) Unconsolidated Joint Venture Outlet Center Square Feet (in thousands) Number of Consolidated Outlet Centers 
Number of Unconsolidated
Outlet Centers
 Quarter Acquired/Open/Disposed/Demolished Consolidated Outlet Center Square Feet (in thousands) Unconsolidated Joint Venture Outlet Center Square Feet (in thousands) Number of Consolidated Outlet Centers 
Number of Unconsolidated
Outlet Centers
As of January 1, 2013   10,737
 2,156
 36
 7
New Developments:        
National Harbor Fourth Quarter 
 336
 
 1
Expansion:        
Gonzales First and Second Quarter 40
 
 
 
Sevierville Third Quarter 19
 
 
 
Acquisition/(Disposition):        
Deer Park Third Quarter 742
 (742) 1
 (1)
Deer Park Warehouse   (29)    
Other   (1) (2) 
 
As of December 31, 2013   11,537
 1,719
 37
 7
As of January 1, 2014   11,537
 1,719
 37
 7
New Developments:                    
Charlotte Third Quarter 
 398
 
 1
 Third Quarter 
 398
 
 1
Ottawa Fourth Quarter 
 288
 
 1
 Fourth Quarter 
 288
 
 1
Expansion:        
Expansions:        
Charleston Second Quarter 17
 
 
 
 Second Quarter 17
 
 
 
Cookstown Fourth Quarter 
 149
 
 
 Fourth Quarter 
 149
 
 
Branson Fourth Quarter 27
 
 
 
 Fourth Quarter 27
 
 
 
Westgate Fourth Quarter 
 50
 
 
 Fourth Quarter 
 50
 
 
Park City Fourth Quarter 21
 
 
 
 Fourth Quarter 21
 
 
 
Sevierville Fourth Quarter 10
 
 
 
 Fourth Quarter 10
 
 
 
Disposition:                
Lincoln City Fourth Quarter (270) 
 (1) 
 Fourth Quarter (270) 
 (1) 
Other   4
 2
 
 
   4
 2
 
 
As of December 31, 2014   11,346
 2,606
 36
 9
   11,346
 2,606
 36
 9
New Developments:                    
Foxwoods Second Quarter 312
 
 1
 
 Second Quarter 312
 
 1
 
Savannah Second Quarter 
 377
 
 1
 Second Quarter 
 377
 
 1
Grand Rapids Third Quarter 352
 
 1
 
 Third Quarter 352
 
 1
 
Southaven Fourth Quarter 320
 
 1
 
 Fourth Quarter 320
 
 1
 
Expansion:        
Expansions:        
Westgate First Quarter 
 28
 
 
 First Quarter 
 28
 
 
San Marcos Fourth Quarter 24
 
 
 
 Fourth Quarter 24
 
 
 
Disposition:        
Dispositions:        
Wisconsin Dells First Quarter 
 (265) 
 (1) First Quarter 
 (265) 
 (1)
Kittery I Third Quarter (52) 
 (1) 
 Third Quarter (52) 
 (1) 
Kittery II Third Quarter (25) 
 (1) 
 Third Quarter (25) 
 (1) 
Tuscola Third Quarter (250) 
 (1) 
 Third Quarter (250) 
 (1) 
West Branch Third Quarter (113) 
 (1) 
 Third Quarter (113) 
 (1) 
Barstow Fourth Quarter (171) 
 (1) 
 Fourth Quarter (171) 
 (1) 
Other   3
 1
 
 
 3
 1
 
 
As of December 31, 2015   11,746
 2,747
 34
 9
   11,746
 2,747
 34
 9
New Developments:        
Columbus Second Quarter 
 355
 
 1
Daytona Beach Fourth Quarter 349
 
 1
 
Acquisition:        
Westgate Second Quarter 408
 (408) 1
 (1)
Savannah Third Quarter 419
 (419) 1
 (1)
Expansions:        
Ottawa First Quarter 
 32
 
 
Savannah Second Quarter 
 42
 
 
Dispositions:        
Fort Myers First Quarter (199) 
 (1) 
Other (13) (1) 
 
As of December 31, 2016   12,710
 2,348
 36
 8


3635




(1)On August 30, 2013, we acquired an additional one-third interest in Deer Park, bringing our total ownership to a two-thirds interest, for total consideration of approximately $27.9 million. As a result of acquiring a controlling ownership interest, Deer Park has been consolidated in our balance sheet and statements of operations since the acquisition date. The fair value of the net assets acquired, on a consolidated basis, totaled $83.8 million, consisting of $319.4 million in rental property and lease related intangibles, $2.3 million in other identifiable assets and liabilities, and $237.9 million in debt. Previously Deer Park was reported within our unconsolidated portfolio of properties.

Leasing Activity
The following table provides information for our consolidated outlet centers regarding space re-leased or renewed during the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively:
 
2015(1)
 
2016 (1)
 # of Leases Square Feet (in 000's) 
Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf)
 
Average
Tenant
Allowance (psf)
 Average Initial Term (in years) 
Net Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf) (3)
 # of Leases Square Feet (in 000's) 
Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf)
 
Average
Tenant
Allowance (psf)
 Average Initial Term (in years) 
Net Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf) (3)
Re-tenant 119
 444
 $31.48
 $28.82
 9.22
 $28.35
 124
 384
 $32.64
 $34.69
 8.75
 $28.68
Renewal 278
 1,282
 26.06
 0.11
 5.04
 26.04
 275
 1,223
 26.59
 0.45
 4.57
 26.49
                        
 
2014 (2)
 
2015 (2)
 # of Leases Square Feet (in 000's) 
Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf)
 
Average
Tenant
Allowance (psf)
 Average Initial Term (in years) 
Net Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf) (3)
 # of Leases Square Feet (in 000's) 
Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf)
 
Average
Tenant
Allowance (psf)
 Average Initial Term (in years) 
Net Average
Annual
Straight-line Base Rent (psf) (3)
Re-tenant 134
 470
 $32.93
 $39.39
 9.02
 $28.56
 119
 444
 $31.48
 $28.82
 9.22
 $28.35
Renewal 275
 1,241
 23.38
 0.21
 4.47
 23.33
 278
 1,282
 26.06
 0.11
 5.04
 26.04
(1)Excludes Fort Myers outlet center, which was sold in January 2016.
(2)Excludes Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch and Barstow outlet centers which were sold in 2015.
(2)Excludes Lincoln City outlet center which was sold in 2014.
(3)Net average straight-line base rent is calculated by dividing the average tenant allowance costs per square foot by the average initial term and subtracting this calculated number from the average straight-line base rent per year amount. The average annual straight-line base rent disclosed in the table above includes all concessions, abatements and reimbursements of rent to tenants. The average tenant allowance disclosed in the table above includes landlord costs.

Results of Operations

20152016 Compared to 20142015

Net Income
Net income increased $144.0decreased $17.8 million in the 2015 period to $222.2 million as2016 compared to $78.22015 . In 2016, we recorded a $95.5 million forgain on the 2014 period. The majorityacquisitions of this increase was dueour venture partners' equity interests in the Westgate and Savannah joint ventures, a $4.9 million gain on the sale of our outlet center in Fort Myers, Florida and $1.4 million gain on the sale of an outparcel at our Hwy 501 outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. In 2015, we recorded gains totaling $120.4 million related to gains from the sale of our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture, and the sales of our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch and Barstow outlet centers, which resulted in gains totaling approximately $120.4 million.centers. In addition, net income increased in the 2015 period primarily due to:2016 was impacted by:
incrementalan increase in operating income fromdue to the opening of one new outlet center, the acquisitions of our partners' interest in two joint ventures, and the full year impact of the addition of three new consolidated centers in 2015 and four small expansions of our consolidated properties completed since January 2014,2015; offset by
the overall growtha decrease in the operating income due to the properties disposed of our existing properties,in early 2016 and 2015; and
an increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venturesinterest expense due to three new propertieshigher average borrowing levels and two significant expansions completed within our unconsolidated joint ventures since January 2014, and
loweran increase in interest expense incurred in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period as a result of debt refinancings completed in 2014.rates.

Offsetting some of the increases to net income include:
lower operating income in 2015 due to the sale of our Lincoln City outlet center in December 2014 as well as the sales of the other outlet centers listed above in 2015, and,
lower earnings as a result of the sale of our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture.


37



In the tables below, information set forth for new developments includes our Foxwoods, Grand Rapids, Southaven and SouthavenDaytona Beach outlet centers, which opened in May 2015, July 2015, November 2015 and November 2015,2016, respectively. Acquisitions include our Westgate and Savannah centers, which were previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures prior to our acquisitions of our venture partners' interest in each venture in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively. Properties disposed includes the Lincoln City outlet center that was sold in December 2014, the Kittery I & II, Tuscola, and West Branch outlet centers sold in September 2015, and the Barstow outlet center sold in October 2015.2015 and the Fort Myers outlet center sold in January 2016.


36




Base Rentals
Base rentals increased $15.2$18.7 million, or 6%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):
 2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Base rentals from existing properties $266,317
 $259,672
 $6,645
 $269,157
 $263,237
 $5,920
Base rentals from new developments 11,656
 
 11,656
 28,718
 11,813
 16,905
Base rentals from acquisitions 9,660
 
 9,660
Base rentals from properties disposed 9,145
 16,253
 (7,108) 66
 12,068
 (12,002)
Termination fees 4,576
 1,310
 3,266
 3,599
 4,576
 (977)
Amortization of above and below market rent adjustments, net (2,006) (2,755) 749
 (2,847) (2,006) (841)
 $289,688
 $274,480
 $15,208
 $308,353
 $289,688
 $18,665

Base rental income generated from existing properties in our portfolio increased due to increases in rental rates on lease renewals, incremental rents from re-tenanting vacant spaces and incremental incomemultiple tenant rental step-ups.

Fees received from the expansionearly termination of our Sevierville, Branson, Park City and San Marcos outlet centers.

Termination fees,leases, which are generally based on the lease term remaining at the time of termination, increaseddecreased as a result of fewer store closures throughout the portfolio in the 20152016 period compared to the 2014 period as a result of certain brand-wide store closures throughout our portfolio. The 2014 period did not have any significant tenant closures.2015 period.

At December 31, 2015,2016, the combined net value representing the amount of unamortized above market lease assets and below market lease liability values, recorded as a part of the purchase price of acquired properties, was a net abovebelow market lease asset totalingliability which totaled approximately $5.9 million.$403,000. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related above or below market lease value would be written off and could materially impact our net income positively or negatively.

Percentage Rentals
Percentage rentals decreased $150,000,increased $1.1 million, or 1%10%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of basepercentage rentals (in thousands):
 2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percentage rentals from existing properties $9,111
 $8,679
 $432
 $9,428
 $8,972
 $456
Percentage rentals from new developments 45
 
 45
 844
 45
 799
Percentage rentals from acquisitions 759
 
 759
Percentage rentals from properties disposed 1,001
 1,628
 (627) 190
 1,140
 (950)
 $10,157
 $10,307
 $(150) $11,221
 $10,157
 $1,064

Percentage rentals represents revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume above their contractual breakpoints.break points. The increase in percentage rentals from existing properties is due to higher sales volume for certain existing tenants and also due to certain new tenants added to the existing properties whose sales exceeded their contractual break point. Reported tenant comparable sales for our consolidated properties for the year ended December 31, 2015 of $395 per square foot were flat compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Reported tenant comparable sales is defined as the weighted average sales per square foot reported in space open for the full duration of each comparison period.


3837




Expense Reimbursements
Expense reimbursements increased $3.9$7.4 million, or 3%6%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of expense reimbursements (in thousands):
 2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Expense reimbursements from existing properties $118,434
 $114,988
 $3,446
 $118,870
 $117,290
 $1,580
Expense reimbursements from new developments 4,005
 
 4,005
 9,931
 4,005
 5,926
Expense reimbursements from acquisitions 4,877
 
 4,877
Expense reimbursements from properties disposed 4,029
 7,544
 (3,515) 140
 5,173
 (5,033)
 $126,468
 $122,532
 $3,936
 $133,818
 $126,468
 $7,350

Expense reimbursements which represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising and management expenses,expenses. For certain tenants, we receive a fixed payment for common area maintenance ("CAM") with annual escalations. While certain expense reimbursements generally fluctuate consistently with the reimbursable propertyrelated expenses, our expense recoveries for CAM as a percentage of expenses were higher in 2016 compared to 2015 due to leases with fixed-CAM escalations. When not reimbursed by the fixed-CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses to which they relate.for the property. See "Property Operating Expenses" below for a discussion of the increase in property operating expenses.expenses from our existing properties.

Most, but not all, leases contain provisions requiring tenants to payreimburse a share of our operating expenses as additional rent. However, substantially all of the leases for our new Foxwoods outlet center, which opened in May 2015, require tenants to pay a single minimum contractual gross rent and, in certain cases, percentage rent; thus, all minimum rents received for the Foxwoods outlet center are recorded as base rent and none are recorded to expense reimbursements.

Management, Leasing and Other Services
Management, leasing and other services increased $1.8decreased $1.6 million, or 51%29%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of management, leasing and other services (in thousands):

 2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Development and leasing $1,827
 $725
 $1,102
 $651
 $1,827
 $(1,176)
Loan guarantee 746
 463
 283
 452
 746
 (294)
Management and marketing 2,853
 2,403
 450
 2,744
 2,853
 (109)
 $5,426
 $3,591
 $1,835
 $3,847
 $5,426
 $(1,579)

The increasedecrease in fees recognized wasmanagement, leasing and other services is primarily due to the increase in the number2016 consolidation of unconsolidated joint ventures for which we provide services in the 2015 period comparedboth our Westgate and Savannah outlet centers due to the 2014 period. The majorityacquisitions of our venture partners' equity interests. This decrease was partially offset by development and leasing fees earned in 2016 from services provided to the increases was due to fees from the Savannah outlet centerColumbus joint venture which opened in April 2015.June 2016.


38




Other Income
Other income decreased $18,000,increased $965,000, or 13%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of other income (in thousands):
 2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Other income from existing properties $6,917
 $7,202
 $(285) $7,510
 $6,874
 $636
Other income from new developments 457
 
 457
 700
 457
 243
Other income from acquisitions 366
 
 366
Other income from properties disposed 256
 446
 (190) 19
 299
 (280)
 $7,630
 $7,648
 $(18) $8,595
 $7,630
 $965


39



Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses increased $9.1$5.5 million, or 7%4%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of property operating expenses (in thousands):

  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Property operating expenses from existing properties $132,439
 $127,952
 $4,487
Property operating expenses from new developments 9,242
 
 9,242
Property operating expenses from properties disposed 4,822
 9,470
 (4,648)
  $146,503
 $137,422
 $9,081

Property operating expenses from existing properties increased due to higher snow removal costs and increased mall office operating costs, maintenance costs, and increased real estate taxes.
  2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Property operating expenses from existing properties $131,928
 $131,252
 $676
Property operating expenses from new developments 15,761
 8,610
 7,151
Property operating expenses from acquisitions 4,279
 
 4,279
Property operating expenses from properties disposed 49
 6,641
 (6,592)
  $152,017
 $146,503
 $5,514

General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in the 20152016 period was flat whenincreased $2.2 million, or 5% compared to the 20142015 period. Increases in general and administrative expenses, including annual wage increases, the addition of new employees subsequent to January 1, 2014 and higher share-based compensation expense related to equity awards granted duringThe 2015 were essentially offset byperiod included the reversal of $731,000 of share-based compensation expense related to the October 2015 announcement ofthat the retirement of ourCompany’s then Chief Financial Officer effectivewould retire in 2016 and decreases in payroll taxes asMay 2016. In addition, the 20142016 period included taxes forincreased legal, consulting and other professional fees compared to the significant amount of notional units that vested in December 2014.

Abandoned Pre-Development Costs
During the 2014 period, we decided to abandon two pre-development projects and as a result, we recorded a $2.4 million charge, representing the cumulative related costs.2015 period.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $1.5$11.4 million, or 1%11%, in the 20152016 period compared to the 20142015 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of depreciation and amortization (in thousands):

 2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Depreciation and amortization expenses from existing properties $95,982
 $97,949
 $(1,967) $93,903
 $94,762
 $(859)
Depreciation and amortization expenses from new developments 5,902
 
 5,902
 15,455
 5,902
 9,553
Depreciation and amortization expenses from acquisitions 5,999
 
 5,999
Depreciation and amortization from properties disposed 2,052
 4,483
 (2,431) 
 3,272
 (3,272)
 $103,936
 $102,432
 $1,504
 $115,357
 $103,936
 $11,421

Depreciation and amortization costs decreased at existing properties as certain construction and development related assets, as well as lease related intangibles recorded as part of the acquisition price of acquired properties, which are amortized over shorter lives, became fully depreciated during 2016. This decrease was partially offset by additional depreciation and amortization recorded as a result of a change in the reporting periods.estimated useful life of assets at various centers where demolition of existing buildings occurred in conjunction with renovations and expansions.


39




Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $3.7increased $6.5 million, or 6%12%, in the 2016 period compared to the 2015 period, due to (1) the conversion of $525.0 million of debt with floating interest rates to higher fixed interest rates, (2) the 30-day LIBOR, which impacts the interest rate we pay on our remaining floating rate debt, increasing relative to its level in the 2015 period, compared toand (3) the 2014 period, due to the issuance of $250 million senior notes in November 2014 which bear an interest rate of 3.75%. The net proceeds were used in December 2014 to redeem our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes which had an original maturity of November 2015.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In November 2014, we completed a $250 million, 3.75% senior notes offering. The net proceeds were used to redeem our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes originally due November 2015. We recorded a charge of approximately $13.1 million for the make-whole premiumadditional debt incurred related to the early redemption, which was completed in December 2014.Westgate and Savannah acquisitions.


40



Gain on Sale of Assets and Interests in Unconsolidated Entities
The gain on sale of assets and interest in unconsolidated entities decreased approximately $114.1 million, or 95%, in the 2016 period compared to the 2015 period. In September 2016, we sold an outparcel at our outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina located on Highway 501 for net proceeds of approximately $2.9 million and recognized a gain of approximately $1.4 million. Also, in the first quarter of 2016, we sold our Fort Myers outlet center for approximately $25.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $4.9 million. In February 2015, we soldrecorded a gain of approximately $13.7 million from the sale of our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the Wisconsin Dells outlet center for approximately $15.6 million, representing our share of the sales price totaling $27.7 million less our share of the outstanding debt, which totaled $12.1 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of approximately $13.7 million in the first quarter of 2015, which represents the difference between the carrying value of our equity method investment and the net proceeds received.

center. In September 2015, we sold our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, and West Branch outlet centers for approximately $43.3 million, which resulted in a gain of $20.2 million and in October 2015, we sold our Barstow outlet center for approximately $105.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $86.5 million.

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures increased approximately $2.4 million or 27% in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Equity in earnings from existing properties $6,618
 $6,001
 $617
Equity in earnings from new developments 4,708
 1,621
 $3,087
Equity in earnings from property disposed 158
 1,431
 (1,273)
  $11,484
 $9,053
 $2,431

The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures from new developments is due to the incremental earnings from the Charlotte outlet center, which opened during the third quarter of 2014; the Ottawa outlet center, which opened during the fourth quarter of 2014; and the Savannah outlet center, which opened in April 2015. The equity in earnings from properties disposed are related to our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture, which we sold in February 2015.

2014 Compared to 2013

Net Income
Net income decreased approximately $35.2 million in the 2014 period to $78.2 million compared to $113.3 million for the 2013 period. The decrease in net income was due in part to the loss from the early redemption of our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes. In November 2014, we completed a $250 million, 3.75% senior notes offering. The net proceeds were used to redeem our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes due November 2015. We recorded a charge of approximately $13.1 million for the early extinguishment of debt. This charge was partially offset by the gain on the sale of our outlet center in Lincoln City. The net proceeds received from the sale of the property were approximately $39.0 million. We recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $7.5 million.

The decrease in net income was also due to a $26.0 million gain on a previously held interest in an acquired joint venture, which owned the property in Deer Park, recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013, as well as $7.8 million recorded as our equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures related to certain transactions that occurred at Deer Park just prior to the acquisition. Previously we owned a one-third interest in the Deer Park, property which was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The acquisition of our controlling interest on August 30, 2013 required us to consolidate the property for financial reporting purposes. As a result, our consolidated statements of operations reflect all of the revenues and expenses of Deer Park since the acquisition date including the significant depreciation and amortization associated with the property, the net effect of which was a reduction in net income.


41



Base Rentals
Base rentals increased $21.1 million, or 8%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):
  2014 2013 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Base rentals from existing properties $252,814
 $245,985
 $6,829
Base rentals from 2013 acquisitions 23,111
 7,494
 15,617
Termination fees 1,310
 609
 701
Amortization of net above and below market lease values (2,755) (686) (2,069)
  $274,480
 $253,402
 $21,078

Base rental income generated from existing properties in our portfolio increased due to increases in rental rates on lease renewals and incremental rents from re-tenanting vacant spaces, as well as incremental base rental income from the expansions at our Branson, Charleston, Park City and Sevierville outlet centers in 2014.

Termination fees, which are generally based on the lease term remaining at the time of termination, increased compared to the 2013 period as the average remaining term on leases terminating early in 2014 was longer than the average remaining term of the leases terminating early in 2013.

At December 31, 2014, the combined net amount of above market lease assets and below market lease liability values, recorded as a part of the purchase price of acquired properties, was a net above market lease asset totaling approximately $7.9 million. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related above or below market lease value will be written off and could materially impact our net income positively or negatively. The change in the amortization of above and below market lease values was primarily attributable to the amortization of the above market lease values recorded from the 2013 acquisition of the Deer Park, New York property.

Percentage Rentals
Percentage rentals decreased $944,000, or 8%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):
  2014 2013 Increase/(Decrease)
Percentage rentals from existing properties $9,726
 $11,147
 $(1,421)
Percentage rentals from 2013 acquisition 581
 104
 477
  $10,307
 $11,251
 $(944)

Percentage rentals represents revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume above their contractual breakpoints. The decrease in percentage rentals is primarily a function of tenants renewing leases with higher base rental rates, and accordingly, higher contractual breakpoints. Reported tenant comparable sales for our consolidated properties for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased approximately 2% to $393 per square foot. Reported tenant comparable sales is defined as the weighted average sales per square foot reported in space open for the full duration of each comparison period.

Expense Reimbursements
Expense reimbursements increased $12.9 million, or 12%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of expense reimbursements (in thousands):
  2014 2013 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Expense reimbursements from existing properties $111,513
 $106,337
 $5,176
Expense reimbursements from 2013 acquisitions 11,019
 3,317
 7,702
  $122,532
 $109,654
 $12,878

42




Expense reimbursements, which represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising and management expenses, generally fluctuate consistently with the reimbursable property operating expenses to which they relate. See "Property Operating Expenses" below for a discussion of the increase in operating expenses from our existing properties.

Management, Leasing and Other Services
Management, leasing and other services increased $511,000, or 17%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of management, leasing and other services (in thousands):
  2014 2013 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Development and leasing $725
 $595
 $130
Loan guarantee 463
 161
 302
Management and marketing 2,403
 2,324
 79
  $3,591
 $3,080
 $511

The increase in development, leasing. management and marketing fees recognized from unconsolidated joint ventures was due to incremental increases from our Ottawa and Charlotte outlet centers, which opened in 2014. The increase in loan guarantee fees was due to fees earned from our Westgate and Savannah joint ventures.

Other Income
Other income increased $216,000, or 3%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of other income (in thousands):
  2014 2013 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Other income from existing properties $7,056
 $7,223
 $(167)
Other income from 2013 acquisitions 592
 209
 383
  $7,648
 $7,432
 $216

Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses increased $16.4 million, or 14%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of property operating expenses (in thousands):
  2014 2013 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Property operating expenses from existing properties $120,987
 $115,979
 $5,008
Property operating expenses from 2013 acquisitions 16,435
 5,067
 11,368
  $137,422
 $121,046
 $16,376

Property operating expenses increased at existing properties due to increases in mall office operating costs and real estate taxes, as well as significantly higher snow removal costs.

General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $5.4 million, or 14%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. This increase was mainly due to additional share-based compensation expense related to the 2014 issuance of restricted shares to directors and certain officers of the Company, the grant of performance shares under a new long term incentive plan and the grant of options to certain employees. Also, the 2014 period included higher payroll related expenses due to the addition of new employees during 2013 and 2014.

Acquisition Costs
The 2013 period included costs related to the acquisition of the additional ownership interest in the Deer Park property as well as costs from other potential acquisitions of operating properties that we chose not to pursue.

43




Abandoned Pre-Development Costs
During the 2014 period, we decided to abandon two pre-development projects and as a result, we recorded a $2.4 million charge, representing the cumulative related costs.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $6.7 million, or 7%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of depreciation and amortization (in thousands):
  2014 2013 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Depreciation and amortization from existing properties $87,071
 $88,920
 $(1,849)
Depreciation and amortization from 2013 acquisitions 15,361
 6,826
 8,535
  $102,432
 $95,746
 $6,686

Depreciation and amortization costs decreased at existing properties as certain construction and development related assets, as well as lease related intangibles recorded as part of the acquisition price of acquired properties, which are amortized over shorter lives, became fully depreciated during the reporting periods.

Interest Expense
Interest expense increased approximately $6.3 million, or 12%, in the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period, primarily due to the acquisition of the additional ownership interest in Deer Park in August 2013. With the acquisition of the additional interest in Deer Park, we consolidated the property with all of the property's debt being reflected on our consolidated balance sheet and the associated interest expense being reflected in interest expense on our consolidated operating statements since the acquisition date. In addition, we issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.875% senior, unsecured notes during the 4th quarter of 2013. The proceeds from these notes repaid amounts outstanding on our unsecured lines of credit which had an interest rate of approximately 1.2%.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In November 2014, we completed a $250 million, 3.75% senior notes offering. The net proceeds were used to redeem our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes due November 2015. We recorded a charge of approximately $13.1 million for the make-whole premium related to the early redemption, which was completed in December 2014.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate
In December 2014, we completed the sale of our outlet center in Lincoln City. The net proceeds received from the sale of the property were approximately $39.0 million. We recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $7.5 million.

Gain on Previously Held Interest in Acquired Joint Venture
In August 2013,June 2016, we acquired an additional one-third ownershipcompleted the purchase of our venture partner's interest in the Deer Park property, bringing ourWestgate joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Glendale, Arizona, for a total ownership to a two-thirds interest. With the acquisition of a controlling interest, we have consolidated the property for financial reporting purposes since the acquisition date. Using the step acquisition approach, we recorded a gaincash price of approximately $26.0 million, representing$40.9 million. The purchase was funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. Prior to the difference between the carrying value and the fair market value of our original equity interest. The carrying value of our original investmenttransaction, we owned a 58% interest in the property had been reduced over time as a result of recognizing our share of the losses generated by the propertyWestgate joint venture since its formation in 2012 and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. The losses were generally theAs a result of depreciationacquiring the remaining interest in the Westgate joint venture, we recorded a gain of $49.3 million, which represented the difference between the carrying book value and amortization expense exceeding earnings before depreciation. In addition, a significant portion of our original investment was returned during the period in which we held the investment due to distributions made to the owners from (1) proceeds received when permanent financing was put in place, (2) proceeds received from the settlement of a lawsuit, and (3) cash on hand immediately prior to our acquisition. Accordingly, a substantial portion of the fair value of our previously held equity interest was recognizedmethod investment in the joint venture, as a gain dueresult of the significant appreciation in the property's value since the completion of its original development and opening.

In August 2016, the Savannah joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Pooler, Georgia, distributed all outparcels along with $15.0 million in cash consideration to the low cost basisother partner in exchange for the partner's ownership interest. We contributed the $15.0 million in cash consideration to the joint venture, which we funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of our equity investment balancecredit. As a result of acquiring the remaining interest in the property.

Other Nonoperating Income (Expense)
During the first quarter of 2014, we incurred property damage to our West Branch outlet center due to a severe snow storm. Our insurance policy provides us with reimbursement for the replacement cost for the damage done to this property. During fiscal 2014,Savannah joint venture, we recorded a casualty gain of $486,000 reflecting$46.3 million, which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our expected total replacement insurance proceedspreviously held equity method investment in excessthe Savannah joint venture, as a result of the totalsignificant appreciation in the property's value since the completion of the net book value written offits original development and demolition costs incurred.opening in April 2015.

44




Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased approximately $2.0 million$612,000 or 5% in the 20142016 period compared to the 20132015 period. The decreasefollowing table sets forth the changes in various components of equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
  2016 2015 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Equity in earnings from existing properties $6,361
 $8,550
 $(2,189)
Equity in earnings from new developments 868
 
 $868
Equity in earnings from properties acquired or disposed 3,643
 2,934
 709
  $10,872
 $11,484
 $(612)

Equity in earnings from existing properties for the 2016 period includes a $2.9 million asset impairment loss representing our share of the impairment loss recorded by the joint venture that owns the Bromont outlet center in Canada. The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures from new developments is primarily due to transactions at the Deer Park propertyincremental earnings from the Columbus outlet center, which opened in 2013 priorJune 2016. The equity in earnings from properties acquired or disposed includes our Westgate and Savannah joint ventures due to ourthe acquisition of an additional one-thirdthe venture partners' interest in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively. Equity in earnings from properties acquired or disposed in the 2015 period includes the Wisconsin Dells joint venture, which we sold in February 2015.

40




2015 Compared to 2014

Net Income
Net income increased $144.0 million in the 2015 period to $222.2 million as compared to $78.2 million for the 2014 period. The majority of this increase was due to gains from the sale of our equity interest in the propertyWisconsin Dells joint venture, and its subsequent consolidationthe sales of our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, West Branch and Barstow outlet centers, which resulted in gains totaling approximately $120.4 million. In addition, net income increased in the 2015 period primarily due to:
incremental operating income from the opening of three new consolidated centers in 2015 and four small expansions of our consolidated properties completed since January 2014;
the overall growth in the operating income of our existing properties;
an increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures due to three new properties and two significant expansions completed within our unconsolidated joint ventures since January 2014; and
lower interest expense incurred in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period as a result of debt refinancings completed in 2014.

Offsetting some of the increases to net income include:
lower operating income in 2015 due to the sale of our Lincoln City outlet center in December 2014 as well as the sales of the other outlet centers listed above in 2015; and
lower earnings as a result of the sale of our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture.

In the tables below, information set forth for financial reporting purposes. Asnew developments includes our Foxwoods, Grand Rapids, and Southaven outlet centers, which opened in May 2015, July 2015, and November 2015, respectively. Properties disposed includes the Lincoln City outlet center that was sold in December 2014, the Kittery I & II, Tuscola, and West Branch outlet centers sold in September 2015 and the Barstow outlet center sold in October 2015.

Base Rentals
Base rentals increased $15.2 million, or 6%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Base rentals from existing properties $266,317
 $259,672
 $6,645
Base rentals from new developments 11,656
 
 11,656
Base rentals from properties disposed 9,145
 16,253
 (7,108)
Termination fees 4,576
 1,310
 3,266
Amortization of above and below market rent adjustments, net (2,006) (2,755) 749
  $289,688
 $274,480
 $15,208

Base rental income generated from existing properties in our portfolio increased due to increases in rental rates on lease renewals, incremental rents from re-tenanting vacant spaces, and incremental income from the expansion of our Sevierville, Branson, Park City and San Marcos outlet centers.

Termination fees, which are generally based on the lease term remaining at the time of termination, increased in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period as a result of certain brand-wide store closures throughout our portfolio. The 2014 period did not have any significant tenant closures.

At December 31, 2015, the combined net value representing the amount of unamortized above market lease assets and below market lease liability values, recorded as a part of the refinancingpurchase price of acquired properties, was a net asset totaling approximately $5.9 million. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related above or below market lease value would be written off and could materially impact our net income positively or negatively.


41




Percentage Rentals
Percentage rentals decreased $150,000, or 1%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of percentage rentals (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percentage rentals from existing properties $9,111
 $8,679
 $432
Percentage rentals from new developments 45
 
 45
Percentage rentals from properties disposed 1,001
 1,628
 (627)
  $10,157
 $10,307
 $(150)

Percentage rentals represents revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume above their contractual break points. The increase in percentage rentals from existing properties is due to higher sales volume for certain existing tenants and also due to certain new tenants added to the existing properties whose sales exceeded their contractual break point. Reported tenant comparable sales for our consolidated properties for the year ended December 31, 2015 of $395 per square foot were flat compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Reported tenant comparable sales is defined as the weighted average sales per square foot reported in space open for the full duration of each comparison period.

Expense Reimbursements
Expense reimbursements increased $3.9 million, or 3%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of expense reimbursements (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Expense reimbursements from existing properties $118,434
 $114,988
 $3,446
Expense reimbursements from new developments 4,005
 
 4,005
Expense reimbursements from properties disposed 4,029
 7,544
 (3,515)
  $126,468
 $122,532
 $3,936

Expense reimbursements, which represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising and management expenses, generally fluctuate consistently with the reimbursable property operating expenses to which they relate. See "Property Operating Expenses" below for a discussion of the increase in property operating expenses.

Most, but not all, leases contain provisions requiring tenants to reimburse a share of our operating expenses as additional rent. However, substantially all of the leases for our new Foxwoods outlet center, which opened in May 2015, require tenants to pay a single minimum contractual gross rent and, in certain cases, percentage rent. Thus, all minimum rents received for the Foxwoods outlet center are recorded as base rent and none are recorded to expense reimbursements.

Management, Leasing and Other Services
Management, leasing and other services increased $1.8 million, or 51%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of management, leasing and other services (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Development and leasing $1,827
 $725
 $1,102
Loan guarantee 746
 463
 283
Management and marketing 2,853
 2,403
 450
  $5,426
 $3,591
 $1,835


42




The increase in fees recognized was due to the increase in the number of unconsolidated joint ventures for which we provide services in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The majority of the increases was due to fees from the Savannah outlet center which opened in April 2015.

Other Income
Other income decreased $18,000, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of other income (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Other income from existing properties $6,917
 $7,202
 $(285)
Other income from new developments 457
 
 457
Other income from properties disposed 256
 446
 (190)
  $7,630
 $7,648
 $(18)

Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses increased $9.1 million, or 7%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of property operating expenses (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Property operating expenses from existing properties $132,439
 $127,952
 $4,487
Property operating expenses from new developments 9,242
 
 9,242
Property operating expenses from properties disposed 4,822
 9,470
 (4,648)
  $146,503
 $137,422
 $9,081

Property operating expenses from existing properties increased due to higher snow removal costs and increased mall office operating costs, maintenance costs, and increased real estate taxes.

General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in the 2015 period was flat when compared to the 2014 period. Increases in general and administrative expenses, including annual wage increases, the addition of new employees subsequent to January 1, 2014 and higher share-based compensation expense related to equity awards granted during 2015, were essentially offset by the reversal of $731,000 of share-based compensation expense related to the October 2015 announcement of the retirement of our Chief Financial Officer effective in 2016 and decreases in payroll taxes as the 2014 period included taxes for the significant amount of notional units that vested in December 2014.

Abandoned Pre-Development Costs
During the 2014 period, we decided to abandon two pre-development projects and as a result, we recorded a $2.4 million charge, representing the cumulative related costs.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $1.5 million, or 1%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of depreciation and amortization (in thousands):

  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Depreciation and amortization expenses from existing properties $95,982
 $97,949
 $(1,967)
Depreciation and amortization expenses from new developments 5,902
 
 5,902
Depreciation and amortization from properties disposed 2,052
 4,483
 (2,431)
  $103,936
 $102,432
 $1,504


43




Depreciation and amortization costs decreased at existing properties as certain construction and development related assets, as well as lease related intangibles recorded as part of the acquisition price of acquired properties, which are amortized over shorter lives, became fully depreciated during the reporting periods.

Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $3.7 million, or 6%, in the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period, due to the issuance of $250 million senior notes in November 2014 which bear an interest rate of 3.75%. The net proceeds were used in December 2014 to redeem our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes which had an original maturity of November 2015.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In November 2014, we completed a $250 million, 3.75% senior notes offering. The net proceeds were used to redeem our $250 million, 6.15% senior notes originally due November 2015. We recorded a charge of approximately $13.1 million for the make-whole premium related to the early redemption, which was completed in December 2014.

Gain on Sale of Assets and Interests in Unconsolidated Entities
In February 2015, we sold our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the Wisconsin Dells outlet center for approximately $15.6 million, representing our share of the sales price totaling $27.7 million less our share of the outstanding debt, at Deer Park in August 2013,which totaled $12.1 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain on early extinguishment of debtapproximately $13.7 million in the first quarter of $13.82015, which represents the difference between the carrying value of our equity method investment and the net proceeds received.

In September 2015, we sold our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, and West Branch outlet centers for approximately $43.3 million, was recorded. In addition a lawsuit was settled which resulted in incomea gain of $20.2 million and in October 2015, we sold our Barstow outlet center for approximately $105.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $86.5 million.

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures increased approximately $2.4 million, or 27%, in the 2015 period compared to Deer Parkthe 2014 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of approximately $9.5 million after expenses. Our one-third share of these transactions, recorded through equity in earnings prior to the acquisition, was approximately $7.8 million. This decrease is partially offset by the incrementalof unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
  2015 2014 
Increase/
(Decrease)
Equity in earnings from existing properties $6,618
 $6,001
 $617
Equity in earnings from new developments 4,708
 1,621
 3,087
Equity in earnings from property disposed 158
 1,431
 (1,273)
  $11,484
 $9,053
 $2,431

The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures from new developments is due to the incremental earnings from the National HarborCharlotte outlet center, and Charlottewhich opened during the third quarter of 2014; the Ottawa outlet center, which opened during the fourth quarter of 20132014; and the third quarter of 2014, respectively.Savannah outlet center, which opened in April 2015. The equity in earnings from properties disposed are related to our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells joint venture, which we sold in February 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company

In this “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company” section, the term, the Company, refers only to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis, excluding the Operating Partnership.
 
The Company's business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses in operating as a public company, which are fully reimbursed by the Operating Partnership. The Company does not hold any indebtedness, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. The Company's principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on its common shares. The Company's principal source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.


44




Through its ownership of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the Operating Partnership's day-to-day management and control. The Company causes the Operating Partnership to distribute all, or such portion as the Company may in its discretion determine, of its available cash in the manner provided in the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement. The Company receives proceeds from equity issuances from time to time, but is required by the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement to contribute the proceeds from its equity issuances to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units of the Operating Partnership.
 
The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with a shelf registration which expires in June 2018 that allows the Company to register unspecified, various classes of equity securities and the Operating Partnership to register unspecified, various classes of debt securities. As circumstances warrant, the Company may issue equity from time to time on an opportunistic basis, dependent upon market conditions and available pricing. The Operating Partnership may use the proceeds to repay debt, including borrowings under its lines of credit, develop new or existing properties, to make acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties toand invest in existing or newly created joint ventures, or for general corporate purposes.

The liquidity of the Company is dependent on the Operating Partnership's ability to make sufficient distributions to the Company. The Operating Partnership is a party to loan agreements with various bank lenders that require the Operating Partnership to comply with various financial and other covenants before it may make distributions to the Company. The Company also guarantees some of the Operating Partnership's debt. If the Operating Partnership fails to fulfill its debt requirements, which trigger the Company's guarantee obligations, then the Company may be required to fulfill its cash payment commitments under such guarantees. However, the Company's only material asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership.
 
The Company believes the Operating Partnership's sources of working capital, specifically its cash flow from operations, and borrowings available under its unsecured credit facilities, are adequate for it to make its distribution payments to the Company and, in turn, for the Company to make its dividend payments to its shareholders. However, there can be no assurance that the Operating Partnership's sources of capital will continue to be available at all or in amounts sufficient to meet its needs, including its ability to make distribution payments to the Company. The unavailability of capital could adversely affect the Operating Partnership's ability to pay its distributions to the Company, which will in turn, adversely affect the Company's ability to pay cash dividends to its shareholders.


45



For the Company to maintain its qualification as a real estate investment trust, it must pay dividends to its shareholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its taxable income. While historically the Company has satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash distributions to its shareholders, it may choose to satisfy this requirement by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, the Company's own shares. Based on our 20152016 estimated taxable income to shareholders, we were required to distribute approximately $101.7$98.4 million to our shareholders in order to maintain our REIT status as described above. We distributed approximately $123.9$120.0 million during 2016, which includesexcludes a special dividend paid in January 2016 related to the 2015 tax year, to shareholders, which exceeded our required distributions.

As a result of this distribution requirement, the Operating Partnership cannot rely on retained earnings to fund its on-going operations to the same extent that other companies whose parent companies are not real estate investment trusts can. The Company may need to continue to raise capital in the equity markets to fund the Operating Partnership's working capital needs, as well as potential developments of new or existing properties, acquisitions or investments in existing or newly created joint ventures.

As
45




The Company currently consolidates the sole owner ofOperating Partnership because it has (1) the general partner with controlpower to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Company consolidatesOperating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes.that could be potentially significant. The Company does not have significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities and the revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements, except for immaterial differences related to cash, other assets and accrued liabilities that arise from public company expenses paid by the Company. However, all debt is held directly or indirectly at the Operating Partnership level, and the Company has guaranteed some of the Operating Partnership's unsecured debt as discussed below. Because the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership, the section entitled “Liquidity"Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership”Partnership" should be read in conjunction with this section to understand the liquidity and capital resources of the Company on a consolidated basis and how the Company is operated as a whole.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership

General Overview

In this “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership” section, the terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Operating Partnership or the Operating Partnership and the Company together, as the text requires.

Property rental income represents our primary source to pay property operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and distributions, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures and acquisitions. To the extent that our cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to cover such non-recurring capital expenditures and acquisitions, we finance such activities from borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit or from the proceeds from the Operating Partnership's debt offerings and the Company's equity offerings.

We believe we achieve a strong and flexible financial position by attempting to: (1) maintain a conservative leverage position relative to our portfolio when pursuing new development, expansion and acquisition opportunities, (2) extend and sequence debt maturities, (3) manage our interest rate risk through a proper mix of fixed and variable rate debt, (4) maintain access to liquidity by using our lines of credit in a conservative manner and (5) preserve internally generated sources of capital by strategically divesting of our non-core assets and maintaining a conservative distribution payout ratio. We manage our capital structure to reflect a long-term investment approach and utilize multiple sources of capital to meet our requirements.


Statements of Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our changes in cash flows from 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
  2016 2015 Change
Net cash provided by operating activities $239,299
 $221,818
 $17,481
Net cash used in investing activities (45,501) (221,827) 176,326
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (203,467) 6,854
 (210,321)
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and equivalents 316
 (1,099) 1,415
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $(9,353) $5,746
 $(15,099)

Operating Activities

In 2016, our cash provided by operating activities was positively impacted by a number of factors, including an increase in operating income as a result of the net growth in leasable square feet in our portfolio of outlet centers and an increase in distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures.


46




StatementsInvesting Activities

The decrease in net cash used in investing activities from 2015 to 2016 is primarily associated with the following:

We used restricted cash of $121.3 million in 2016, which was received in 2015, to repay a portion of our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which had an original maturity date in August 2018, and our $28.4 million deferred financing obligation, both of which related to the Deer Park outlet center.
Cash Flowsprovided from asset sales decreased in 2016 compared to 2015, as proceeds from the sales of our Fort Myers outlet center and an outparcel at our outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina located on Highway 501 were lower than the proceeds from the sale of our equity interest in the Wisconsin Dells outlet center in 2015.
Cash used for additions to rental property decreased in 2016 due to less new outlet center construction activity in 2016 as compared to 2015. The 2015 period included additions for our Foxwoods, Grand Rapids, and Southaven outlet centers, all of which opened during 2015, while the 2016 period primarily included construction at our Daytona Beach outlet center.
Distributions in excess of earnings increased in the 2016 period due the Columbus joint venture closing on an interest-only mortgage loan of $85.0 million. The joint venture received net loan proceeds of $84.2 million and distributed them equally to the partners. Our share of the distribution was $42.1 million.
Partially offsetting the above items were the acquisitions of our venture partners' interest in our Westgate joint venture and Savannah joint venture and fewer contributions in the 2016 period to our unconsolidated joint ventures as a result of less development activity in the 2016 period compared to the 2015 period.

Financing Activities

The increase in net cash used in financing activities from 2015 to 2016 is primarily associated with the following:

Increase in cash distributions paid due to a special dividend that was paid in January 2016 and an increase in quarterly dividends paid to common shareholders in 2016.
Increase in cash used for debt repayments, which included the repayments of the Deer Park $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, the $10.0 million unsecured note payable, the $7.5 million unsecured term note, the Westgate $62.0 million floating rate mortgage and our Savannah $98.0 million floating rate mortgage.
Cash used for the payment of a deferred financing obligation to a former partner at Deer Park, which increased our legal ownership to 100%.
Partially offsetting the above items was an increase in borrowings including the public offering of an aggregate $350 million of 3.125% unsecured senior notes due September 2026, netting proceeds of approximately $344.5 million and an additional $75.0 million in proceeds received from an amendment to our unsecured term loan to increase the size of the loan from $250.0 million to $325.0 million. In 2015, new borrowings for notes, mortgages, loans totaled $90.8 million and was primarily related to construction draws related to the Southaven and Foxwoods mortgages. In 2015, we also repaid the mortgages at our Hershey and Ocean City outlet centers, which totaled $46.6 million.

The following table sets forth our changes in cash flows from 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
  2015 2014 Change
Net cash provided by operating activities $221,818
 $187,959
 $33,859
Net cash used in investing activities (221,827) (188,588) (33,239)
Net cash provided by financing activities 6,854
 1,977
 4,877
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and equivalents (1,099) (526) (573)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $5,746
 $822
 $4,924


47




Operating Activities

In 2015, our cash provided from operating activities was positively impacted by a number of factors, including an increase in operating income throughout the consolidated portfolio from increases in base rental rates, operating income from our Foxwoods, Grand Rapids, and Memphis outlet centers which opened in May 2015, July 2015, and November 2015, respectively, four small expansions of our consolidated properties completed during 2014, and an increase in distributions received from unconsolidated joint ventures from the new centers and expansions completed in 2014.

Investing Activities

The increase in net cash used in investing activities is primarily associated with the following:

Cash used for additions to rental property increased due to the construction of our Foxwoods, Grand Rapids, and Memphis outlet centers which opened during 2015.
Less cash was received in 2015 compared to 2014 from unconsolidated joint ventures that represented a return of investment as the 2014 period included the distribution of $89.4 million in net loan proceeds related the Charlotte joint venture that was distributed equally to the partners.
Cash provided from assets sales increased year over year as in 2015 we sold our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the Wisconsin Dells outlet center and five other properties compared to a sale of one property in 2014. Of the $164.6 million in proceeds received from the 2015 asset sales, approximately $121.3 million was held as restricted cash as of December 31, 2015.
Contributions to our unconsolidated joint ventures for the property development activities was much less in 2015 compared to 2014 as one new joint venture project (Savannah) was under construction during the 2015 period compared to the construction of three new properties (Charlotte, Ottawa and Savannah) and two significant expansions (Cookstown and Westgate) in the 2014 period.

Financing Activities

The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to a decrease in the amounts paid by us on behalf of certain employees related to income taxes from shares withheld upon vesting of equity awards. The increase was offset by an increase in the quarterly dividends paid to our common shareholders.



47



Current Development Activities

We intend to continue to grow our portfolio by developing, expanding or acquiring additional outlet centers. In the section below, we describe the new developments that are either currently planned, underway or recently completed. However, you should note that any developments or expansions that we, or a joint venture that we are involved in, have planned or anticipated may not be started or completed as scheduled, or may not result in accretive net income or FFO. See the section “Funds From Operations” in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section for further discussion of FFO. In addition, we regularly evaluate acquisition or disposition proposals and engage from time to time in negotiations for acquisitions or dispositions of properties. We may also enter into letters of intent for the acquisition or disposition of properties. Any prospective acquisition or disposition that is being evaluated or which is subject to a letter of intent may not be consummated, or if consummated, may not result in an increase in liquidity, net income or funds from operations.

Acquisition and New Development of Consolidated Outlet Centers

FoxwoodsWestgate Acquisition

In May 2015,June 2016, we opened an approximately 312,000 square footcompleted the purchase of our partners' interest in the Westgate joint venture, which owned the outlet center atin Glendale, Arizona, for a total cash price of approximately $40.9 million. Prior to the Foxwoods Resort Casinotransaction, we owned a 58% interest in Mashantucket, Connecticut.the Westgate joint venture since its formation in 2012 and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. The former joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and was consolidated in our financial results as of June 30, 2016.


48




The total cash price included $39.0 million to acquire the 40% ownership interest held by the equity partner in the joint venture. We ownalso purchased the remaining 2% noncontrolling ownership interests in the Westgate outlet center held in a controllingconsolidated partnership for a purchase price of $1.9 million. The acquisition of the noncontrolling ownership interest was recorded as an equity transaction and, as a result, the carrying balances of the noncontrolling interest were eliminated and the remaining difference between the purchase price and carrying balance was recorded as a reduction in additional-paid-in-capital. We funded the total purchase price with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. At the time of the acquisition, the property was subject to a $62.0 million mortgage loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.75% and a maturity in June 2017. In August 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan in full with proceeds from the public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2026.

Savannah Acquisition

In August 2016, the Savannah joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Pooler, Georgia distributed all outparcels along with $15.0 million in cash consideration to the other partner in exchange for the partner's ownership interest. We contributed the $15.0 million in cash consideration to the joint venture, which we funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. At the time of acquisition, the property was subject to a $96.9 million construction loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%, that would have matured in May 2017. In September 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.

The former joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and was consolidated in our financial results as of the acquisition date.  Prior to this transaction, we owned a 50% legal interest in the joint venture which is consolidatedsince its formation and accounted for financial reporting purposes. Asit under the equity method of December 31, 2015, our partner’saccounting. However, due to preferred equity contributions totaled approximately $1.0 million and our equity contributions totaled approximately $58.8 million. Contributions we make in excess of $40.0 million earn a preferred rate of return of 15% from the date of contribution. In addition, each partner earns a rate of return of 10% on their initial capital contributions from the date of contribution. Under the terms ofmade to the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned contributionsventure, and all unpaidthe returns earned on those contributions, prior to any distributions being made to our partner. Accordingly, we expect our currentestimated economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage of 67%. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value our economic interest would representof the assets was approximately 98%. Therefore, substantially all of the economic benefitearnings of the property. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a numberjoint venture were previously recognized by us as equity in earnings of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.unconsolidated joint ventures. 

Grand RapidsDaytona Beach

In July 2015,November 2016, we opened an approximately 352,000349,000 square foot, wholly-owned, outlet center near Grand Rapids, Michigan. Thein Daytona Beach, Florida. This outlet center is located 11 miles south of downtown Grand Rapids at the southwest quadrant of US-131features over 80 brand name and 84th Street in Byron Township, Michigan, with visibility from both roads. designer outlet stores.

Southaven

In November 2015, we opened an approximately 320,000 square foot outlet center in Southaven, Mississippi. In January 2015, we purchased land for approximately $14.8 million and commenced construction on the development of Tanger Outlets Southaven, which is located less than five miles south of Memphis, Tennessee. We own a controlling interest in the joint venture which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. As of December 31, 2015, our partner’s equity contributions totaled approximately $461,000and our equity contributions totaled approximately $26.5 million. From the date our equity contributions are made, we earn a preferred rate of return of 10% for senior contributions and 14% for junior contributions. As of December 31, 2015, the balance of our senior contributions was $17.7 million and our junior contributions was $8.3 million.

Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our partner. Accordingly, we expect our current economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage of 50%. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value, our economic interest would represent substantially all of the economic benefit of the property. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.


48



The following table summarizes our projects under development as of December 31, 2015:2016:

Project
Approximate square feet
(in 000's)
Projected Total Net Cost per Square Foot
(in dollars)
Projected Total Net Cost
(in millions)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
Projected Opening
Approximate square feet
(in 000's)
Projected Total Net Cost per Square Foot
(in dollars)
Projected Total Net Cost
(in millions)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
Projected Opening
Daytona Beach352
$259
$91.2
$17.3
Holiday 2016
New development    
Fort Worth352
$256
$90.2
$19.8
Holiday 2017
   
Expansion   
Lancaster123
388
47.7
15.4
Q3 2017
   
Total475
$290
$137.9
$35.2
 

Daytona BeachFort Worth

In November 2015,September 2016, we purchased land in the greater Fort Worth, Texas area for approximately $9.9$11.2 million and commencedbegan construction immediately on the development of a wholly ownedwholly-owned outlet center. The outlet center will be located within the 279-acre Champions Circle mixed-use development adjacent to Texas Motor Speedway.


49




Lancaster Expansion

In July 2016, we commenced construction on a 123,000 square foot expansion of our outlet center in Daytona Beach, Florida. TheLancaster, Pennsylvania.

Disposition of Properties

Fort Myers

In January 2016, we sold our outlet center is expectedin Fort Myers, Florida for net proceeds of approximately $25.8 million for a gain of $4.9 million. The proceeds from the sale of this unencumbered asset were used to bepay down balances outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit.

Myrtle Beach

In September 2016, we also sold an outparcel at our outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina located on Highway 501 for net proceeds of approximately 352,000 square feet and to open by Holiday 2016.$2.9 million for a gain of $1.4 million.

New Development in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

From time to time, we form joint venture arrangements to develop outlet centers. The following table summarizes our unconsolidated joint venture development projects as of December 31, 2015:
ProjectOwnership %
Approximate square feet
(in 000's)
Projected Total Net Cost per Square Foot
(in dollars)
Projected Total Net Cost
(in millions)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
Projected Opening
Columbus50%355
$267
$94.9
$41.2
June 2016

During the second quarter of 2015, the joint venture purchased land for approximately $8.9 million and began construction on a 350,000 square foot outlet center in Columbus, Ohio. We and our partner currently expect to complete construction in time to open the center during the second quarter of 2016. The construction of the center is currently being funded with equity contributions from the partners. As of December 31, 2015, we and our partner had each contributed $20.6 million to fund development activities.

See "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements" for a discussion of unconsolidated joint venture development activities.

Other Potential Future Developments and Dispositions of Rental Property

As of the date of this filing, we are in the initial study period for potential new developments. We may also use joint venture arrangements to develop other potential sites. There can be no assurance, however, that these potential future developments will ultimately be developed.

In the case of projects to be wholly-owned by us, we expect to fund these projects with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit and cash flow from operations, but may also fund them with capital from additional public debt and equity offerings. For projects to be developed through joint venture arrangements, we may use collateralized construction loans to fund a portion of the project, with our share of the equity requirements funded from sources described above.

On September 30, 2015, the noncontrolling interest in our Deer Park outlet center exercised its right to require us to acquire their ownership interest in the property for $28.4 million. The transaction closed on January 5, 2016. The obligation to acquire its interest is recorded as a deferred financing obligation in the other liabilities section of our consolidated balance sheet.


49



From time to time, we may sell one or more outlet centers that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. In February 2015, we sold our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the Wisconsin Dells outlet center for approximately $15.6 million, representing our share of the sales price totaling $27.7 million less our share of the outstanding debt, which totaled $12.1 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of approximately $13.7 million in the first quarter of 2015, which represents the difference between the carrying value of our equity method investment and the net proceeds received.

During 2015, we sold five outlet centers for net proceeds of approximately $149.1 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $106.7 million. The outlet centers were located in Kittery, Maine (two centers); Tuscola, Illinois; West Branch, Michigan; and Barstow, California.

As of December 31, 2015, approximately $121.3 million of these proceeds were held by a qualified intermediary and thus have been classified as restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets. During January 2016, we used a portion of these proceeds along with amounts under our unsecured lines of credit:

To repay a $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan and a $28.4 million deferred financing obligation, both of which are related to our 749,000 square foot outlet center in Deer Park, New York. These transactions allowed us to unencumber the Deer Park asset while simultaneously deferring a significant portion of the gains related to the asset sales for tax purposes.
To pay a special dividend to our share and unit holders of $0.21 per share on January 15, 2016.

We plan on investing the remaining sales proceeds, totaling approximately $16.8 million, in qualified replacement property, including the ongoing construction of our wholly-owned new outlet center development project in Daytona Beach.

In January 2016, we sold our outlet center in Fort Myers, Florida located near Sanibel Island for net proceeds of approximately $25.8 million. We estimate the gain to be recognized in the first quarter of 2016 to be approximately $4.9 million. The proceeds from the sale of this unencumbered asset were used to pay down balances outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit.

Financing Arrangements

As of December 31, 2015,2016, unsecured borrowings represented 80%90% of our outstanding debt and 75%88% of the gross book value of our real estate portfolio was unencumbered. As of December 31, 2016, 11% of our outstanding debt , excluding variable rate debt with interest rate protection agreements in place, had variable interest rates and therefore were subject to market fluctuations. We maintain unsecured lines of credit that provide for borrowings of up to $520.0 million, includingmillion. The unsecured lines of credit include a $20.0 million liquidity line and a $500.0 million syndicated line. Following the amendments in 2015 described below in the section "Extension of Unsecured Lines of Credit", our unsecured lines of credit bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 0.90% and theThe syndicated line may be increased up to $1.0 billion through an accordion feature in certain circumstances. The unsecured lines of credit have an expiration date of October 24, 2019 with an option for a one year extension. The Company guarantees the Operating Partnership's obligations under these lines. As of December 31, 2016, we had $453.6 million available under our unsecured lines of credit after considering outstanding letters of credit of $5.4 million.

2016 Transactions

Deer Park MortgageDebt Repayment

In January 2016, we repaidused restricted cash and unsecured lines of credit to repay our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which had an original maturity date in August 2018, and our $28.4 million deferred financing obligation, both of which are related to our 749,000 square foot outlet center in Deer Park, outlet center.NY. These transactions allowed us to unencumber the Deer Park asset while simultaneously deferring a significant portion of the gains related to the asset salesassets sold in 2015 for tax purposes.


50




Unsecured Term Note Repayment

In February 2016, we repaid our $7.5 million unsecured term note, which had an original maturity date in August 2017.

Unsecured Term Loan

In April 2016, we amended our unsecured term loan to increase the size of the loan from $250.0 million to $325.0 million, extend the maturity date from February 2019 to April 2021, reduce the interest rate spread over LIBOR from 1.05% to 0.95%, and increase the incremental loan availability through an accordion feature from $150.0 million to $175.0 million.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

In April 2016, we entered into four separate interest rate swap agreements, effective April 13, 2016 that fixed the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.03% on notional amounts totaling $175.0 million through January 1, 2021.

Unsecured Note Payable Repayment

In June 2016, our $10.0 million unsecured note payable became due and was repaid on June 23, 2016.


Aggregate $350.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes due 2026 and Westgate Debt Repayment

In August 2016, we completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2026 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 99.605% of the principal amount to yield 3.171% to maturity. In October 2016, we sold an additional $100.0 million of our senior notes due 2026. The notes priced at 98.962% of the principal amount to yield 3.248% to maturity. The notes pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.125% per annum and mature on September 1, 2026. The aggregate net proceeds from the offerings, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $344.5 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay a $62.0 million floating rate mortgage loan related to the outlet center in Glendale (Westgate), Arizona, repay borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit, and for general corporate purposes.

Savannah Debt Repayment

At the time of acquisition, the Savannah outlet center was subject to a $96.9 million mortgage loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65% and maturity date in May 2017. In September 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.

2015 Transactions

Southaven Mortgage

In April 2015, the consolidated joint venture closed on aan interest only mortgage loan with the ability to borrow up to $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR +1.75%. The loan initially matures on April 29, 2018, with one two-year extension option.
As of December 31, 20152016 the balance on the loan was $45.8$59.3 million.

Hershey Mortgage

In May 2015, we repaid the mortgages associated with our Hershey outlet center, which were assumed as part of the acquisition of the property in 2011. The maturity date of the mortgages was August 1, 2015 and it had a principal balance at the date of extinguishment of $29.0 million.


51




Ocean City Mortgage

In July 2015, we repaid the mortgage associated with our Ocean City outlet center, which was assumed as part of the acquisition of the property in 2011. The maturity date of the mortgage was January 6, 2016 and had a principal balance at the date of extinguishment of $17.6 million.

Extension of Unsecured Lines of Credit

In October 2015, we closed on amendments to our unsecured lines of credit, extending the maturity and reducing our interest rate. The maturity date of these facilities was extended from October 2017 to October 2019 with the ability to further extend the maturity date for an additional year at our option. The interest rate was reduced from LIBOR + 1.00% to LIBOR + 0.90% based on our current credit rating and the maximum borrowings to which the syndicated line could be increased through an accordion feature in certain circumstances was increased from $750.0 million to $1.0 billion. Loan origination costs associated with the amendments totaled approximately $2.0 million.

2014 Transactions

Amendment of $250.0 Million Unsecured Term Loan

In July 2014, we entered into an amendment of our $250.0 million unsecured term loan which, maturesat the time, was scheduled to mature in February 2019. The amendment reduced the interest rate on the loan from LIBOR + 1.60% to LIBOR + 1.05%. No other material terms of the loan were amended.

$250.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes

In November 2014, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2024 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 99.429% of the principal amount to yield 3.819% to maturity. The notes will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.750% per annum and mature on December 1, 2024. The net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $246.2 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to redeem our $250.0 million 6.15% senior notes due November 2015. We recorded a charge of approximately $13.1 million for the make-whole premium related to the early redemption, which was completed in December 2014.

Foxwoods Mortgage

In December 2014, the consolidated joint venture closed on aan interest only mortgage loan with the ability to borrow up to $70.3 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. In November 2016, the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR + 1.55%due to us reaching our debt service coverage ratio. The loan initially matures in December 2017, with two one-year extension options. As of December 31, 2015 the balance on the loan was $70.3 million.


51



2013 Transactions

Assumption of $150.0 Million Mortgage

In August 2013, as part of the acquisition of a controlling ownership interest in Deer Park, we assumed an $150.0 million interest only mortgage loan, including a fair value discount of $1.6 million. The loan has a five year term and carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.50%. As discussed above, we repaid this loan in January 2016.

Derivatives

In October 2013, to reduce our floating rate debt exposure, we entered into interest rate swap agreements on notional amounts totaling $150.0 millionthat fixed the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.30%from November 2013 to August 2016.

Extension of Unsecured Lines of Credit
52


In October 2013, we amended our unsecured lines of credit, extending the maturity, and reducing the overall borrowing costs. The maturity of these facilities was extended from November 10, 2015 to October 24, 2017 with the ability to further extend the maturity for an additional year at our option. The annual commitment fee, which is payable on the full $520.0 million in loan commitments, was reduced from 0.175% to 0.15%, and the interest rate spread over LIBOR was reduced from 1.10% to 1.00% based on our current credit rating. Loan origination costs associated with the amendments totaled approximately $1.5 million. The lines of credit were further amended in October 2015 as discussed above.


$250.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes

In November 2013, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2023 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 98.360% of the principal amount to yield 4.076% to maturity. The notes will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.875% per annum and mature on December 1, 2023. The net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $243.6 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.

Capital Expenditures
The following table details our capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively (in thousands):
 2015 2014 Change 2016 2015 Change
Capital expenditures analysis:            
New outlet center developments $222,111
 $107,907
 $114,204
 $112,831
 $222,111
 $(109,280)
Major outlet center renovations 1,602
 18,412
 (16,810) 17,079
 1,602
 15,477
Second generation tenant improvement allowances 10,414
 14,324
 (3,910) 11,307
 10,414
 893
Other capital expenditures 10,212
 18,509
 (8,297) 21,528
 10,212
 11,316
 244,339
 159,152
 85,187
 162,745
 244,339
 (81,594)
Conversion from accrual to cash basis (5,633) (13,256) 7,623
 2,315
 (5,633) 7,948
Additions to rental property-cash basis $238,706
 $145,896
 $92,810
 $165,060
 $238,706
 $(73,646)
New center development expenditures, which include first generation tenant allowances, during 2016 relate to construction expenditures for our Daytona Beach and Fort Worth outlet centers and an expansion at our Lancaster outlet center. During 2015, new center development expenditures included the construction of our Grand Rapids, Southaven, and Foxwoods outlet centers in the 2015 period. The 2014 period included new center development expenditures for our Grand Rapids and Foxwoods outlet centers and expansions at our Charleston, Branson, Sevierville, and Park City outlet centers.
Major center renovations in both the 2015 and 2014 periodsduring 2016 included construction activities at our Riverhead, and our Rehoboth Beach and Howell outlet centers.

52




In 2016, other capital expenditures includes costs incurred for solar equipment at several centers in our portfolio.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table details our contractual obligations over the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 20152016 (in thousands):
Contractual Obligations 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total
Debt (2)(1)
 $12,842
 $80,758
 $199,008
 $443,669
 $303,566
 $527,343
 $1,567,186
 $73,258
 $62,460
 $64,369
 $303,566
 $330,793
 $871,552
 $1,705,998
Interest payment (2)(3)
 52,702
 52,284
 49,052
 42,970
 28,679
 70,508
 296,195
Interest payments (2)
 61,279
 58,612
 57,628
 45,212
 33,374
 100,745
 356,850
Operating leases 5,982
 5,981
 5,667
 5,716
 5,720
 294,851
 323,917
 6,709
 6,334
 6,237
 6,217
 6,258
 303,509
 335,264
Deferred financing obligation (4)
 28,388
 
 
 
 
 
 28,388
 $99,914
 $139,023
 $253,727
 $492,355
 $337,965
 $892,702
 $2,215,686
 $141,246

$127,406

$128,234

$354,995

$370,425

$1,275,806

$2,398,112
(1)These amounts represent total future cash payments related to debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2015.2016.
(2)In January 2016, we repaid our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan originally due in 2018, which is related to our outlet center in Deer Park, New York.
(3)These amounts represent future interest payments related to our debt obligations based on the fixed and variable interest rates specified in the associated debt agreements. All of our variable rate debt agreements are based on the one month LIBOR rate, thus for purposes of calculating future interest amounts on variable interest rate debt, the one month LIBOR rate as of December 31, 20152016 was used.
(4)As part of the acquisition in 2013 of a controlling ownership interest in Deer Park, we and the noncontrolling interest entered into an agreement whereby they may require us to acquire their ownership interest in the property on the second anniversary of the acquisition date for a price of $28.4 million, and we had the option to acquire their ownership interest on the fourth anniversary of the acquisition date at the same price. On September 30, 2015, the noncontrolling interest in our Deer Park outlet center exercised its right to require us to acquire their ownership interest in the property for $28.4 million. The transaction closed on January 5, 2016. The obligation to redeem their interest at the redemption price was recorded as a deferred financing obligation in the other liabilities section of the balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.


53




In addition to the contractual payment obligations shown in the table above, we have commitments of $50.6$77.9 million remaining as of December 31, 20152016 related to contracts to complete construction, and development activity at outlet centers, and other capital expenditures throughout our consolidated portfolio. These amounts would be primarily funded by amounts available under our unsecured lines of credit but could also be funded by other sources of capital, such as collateralized construction loans or public debt and equity offerings. In addition, we have commitments to pay approximately $5.4$33.7 million in tenant allowances for leases that are executed but where the tenant improvements have not been constructed. Payments are only made upon the tenant opening its store, completing its interior construction and submitting the necessary documentation required per its lease. Contractual commitments to complete construction and development activity related to our unconsolidated joint ventures amounted to approximately $34.5$10.1 million at December 31, 2015,2016, of which our portion was approximately $17.2$5.0 million. In addition, commitments related to tenant allowances at our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled approximately $14.4 million$93,000 at December 31, 2015,2016, of which our portion was approximately $7.2 million.$47,000. Contractual commitments represent only those costs subject to contracts which are legal binding agreements as of December 31, 20152016 and do not necessary represent the total cost to complete the projects.

Our debt agreements contain covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage and leverage, and limit the payment of dividends such that dividends and distributions will not exceed funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95% on a cumulative basis. We have historically been and currently are in compliance with all of our debt covenants. We expect to remain in compliance with all our existing debt covenants; however, should circumstances arise that would cause us to be in default, the various lenders would have the ability to accelerate the maturity on our outstanding debt.


53



We believe our most restrictive financial covenants are contained in our senior, unsecured notes. Key financial covenants and their covenant levels, which are calculated based on contractual terms, include the following:
Senior unsecured notes financial covenants Required Actual
Total consolidated debt to adjusted total assets < 60% 4950%
Total secured debt to adjusted total assets < 40% 105%
Total unencumbered assets to unsecured debt > 150% 181190%

We operate in a manner intended to enable us to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. A REIT that distributes at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders each year and that meets certain other conditions is not taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. Based on our 20152016 estimated taxable income to shareholders, we were required to distribute approximately $101.7$98.4 million to our shareholders in order to maintain our REIT status as described above. We distributed approximately $123.9$120.0 million, which includesexcludes a special dividend paid in January 2016 related to the 2015 tax year, to shareholders, which exceeded our required distributions. If in any taxable year the Company were to fail to qualify as a REIT and certain statutory relief provisions were not applicable, we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates.


54




Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table details certain information as of December 31, 20152016 about various unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in which we have an ownership interest:

Joint Venture Outlet Center Location Ownership % 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) Outlet Center Location Ownership % 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Carrying Value of Investment (in millions)
Columbus Columbus, OH 50.0% 
 $21.1
 Columbus, OH 50.0% 355
 $6.7
National Harbor National Harbor, MD 50.0% 339
 6.1
 National Harbor, MD 50.0% 341
 4.1
RioCan Canada Various 50.0% 870
 117.2
 Various 50.0% 901
 117.3
Savannah (1)
 Savannah, GA 50.0% 377
 44.4
Westgate Glendale, AZ 58.0% 411
 12.3
     $201.1
     $128.1
            
Charlotte(2)
 Charlotte, NC 50.0% 398
 $(1.1)
Galveston/Houston (2)
 Texas City, TX 50.0% 353
 (1.5)
Charlotte(1)
 Charlotte, NC 50.0% 398
 $(2.5)
Galveston/Houston (1)
 Texas City, TX 50.0% 353
 (3.8)
     $(2.6)     $(6.3)
(1)Based on capital contribution and distribution provisions in the joint venture agreement, we expect our economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than the ownership percentage indicated above, which in this case, states our legal interest in this venture. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.
(2)The negative carrying value is due to the distributions of proceeds from mortgage loans and quarterly distributions of excess cash flow exceeding the original contributions from the partners.

Our joint ventures are generally subject to buy-sell provisions which are customary for joint venture agreements in the real estate industry. Either partner may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up period), which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or additional borrowings to acquire the other party's interest. Under these provisions, one partner sets a price for the property, then the other partner has the option to either (1) purchase their partner's interest based on that price or (2) sell its interest to the other partner based on that price. Since the partner other than the partner who triggers the provision has the option to be the buyer or seller, we do not consider this arrangement to be a mandatory redeemable obligation.


54



We provide guarantees to lenders for our joint ventures which include standard non-recourse carve out indemnifications for losses arising from items such as but not limited to fraud, physical waste, payment of taxes, environmental indemnities, misapplication of insurance proceeds or security deposits and failure to maintain required insurance. For construction and term loans, we may include a guaranty of completion as well as a principal guaranty ranging from 5% to 100% of principal.  The principal guarantees include terms for release based upon satisfactory completion of construction and performance targets including occupancy thresholds and minimum debt service coverage tests. Our joint ventures may contain make whole provisions in the event that demands are made on any existing guarantees.

Charlotte

In July 2014, we opened an approximately 398,000 square foot outlet center in Charlotte, North Carolina that was developed through, and is owned by, a joint venture formed in May 2013. The outlet center is located eight miles southwest of uptown Charlotte at the interchange of I-485 and Steele Creek Road (North Carolina Highway 160). Construction of the outlet center, which commenced during the third quarter of 2013, was initially funded with equal equity contributions by the partners. In November 2014, the joint venture closed on an interest onlyinterest-only mortgage loan for $90.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.45%. The loan initially matures in November 2018, with the option to extend the maturity for one additional year. The joint venture received net loan proceeds of $89.4 millionand distributed them equally to the partners. The loan balance as of December 31, 2015 was approximately $90.0 million. Our partner is providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.

Columbus

During the second quarter of 2015, the joint venture purchased land forIn June 2016, we opened an approximately $8.9 million and began construction on a 350,000355,000 square foot outlet center in Columbus, Ohio. We and our partner currently expect to complete construction in time to open the center during the second quarter of 2016. The construction of the center is currently being funded with equity contributions from the partners. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we and our partner had each contributed $20.6$47.5 million to fund development activities. Our In November 2016, the joint venture closed on an interest-only mortgage loan of $85.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. The loan initially matures in November 2019, with two one-year extension options. The joint venture received net loan proceeds of $84.2 million and distributed them equally to the partners. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture. During construction, our partner is providingprovided development services to the joint venture and we, along with our partner, are providingprovided joint leasing services. Once the center opens, we will provide property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.


55




Galveston/Houston

In October 2012, we opened an approximately 353,000 square foot outlet center in Texas City, Texas that was developed through, and is owned by, a joint venture formed in June 2011. The development was initially fully funded with equity contributed to the joint venture by Tanger and its partner. In July 2013, the joint venture closed on a $70.0 million mortgage loan with a rate of LIBOR + 1.50% and a maturity date of July 2017, with the option to extend the maturity for one additional year. The joint venture received total loan proceeds of $65.0 million and distributed the net proceeds equally to the partners. We used our share of the proceeds to reduce amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the outlet center.

National Harbor

In November 2013, we opened an approximately 339,000341,000 square foot outlet center at National Harbor in the Washington, D.C. Metro area that was developed through, and is owned by, a joint venture formed in May 2011. In November 2014, the joint venture amended the initial construction loan to increase the amount available to borrow from $62.0 million to $87.0 million and extended the maturity date until November 2019. The loan carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. At the closing of the amendment, the joint venture distributed approximately $19.0 million equally between the partners. The loan balance as of December 31, 20152016 was approximately $87.0 million. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.

RioCan Canada

We have a 50/50 co-ownership agreement with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust to develop and acquire outlet centers in Canada. Under the agreement, any outlet centers developed or acquired will be branded as Tanger Outlet Centers. We have agreed to provide leasing and marketing services for the outlet centers and RioCan has agreed to provide development and property management services.


55



In October 2014, the co-owners opened Tanger Outlets Ottawa, the first ground up development of a Tanger Outlet Center in Canada. Located in suburban Kanata offIn March 2016, the TransCanada Highway (Highway 417) at Palladium Drive, the outlet center currently contains approximately 284,000 square feet, with additional square footage totalingco-owners opened an approximately 28,000 square feetfoot expansion related to an anchor tenant bringing the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 316,000 square feet. In 2016, the co-owners commenced construction on a 40,000 square foot expansion, which is expected to be completed and opened in early 2016.open during the second quarter of 2017.

In November 2014, the co-owners opened an approximately 149,000 square foot expansion to the existing Cookstown Outlet Mall, bringing the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 309,000308,000 square feet.

Other properties owned by the RioCan Canada co-owners include Les Factoreries Saint-Sauveur and Bromont Outlet Mall. Les Factoreries Saint-Sauveur is located northwest of Montreal adjacent to Highway 15 in the town of Saint-Sauveur, Quebec and is approximately 116,000 square feet. Thefeet and the Bromont Outlet Mall is located east of Montreal near the eastern townships adjacent to Highway 10 in the town of Bromont, Quebec and is approximately 161,000 square feet.

Rental property held and used by our joint ventures are reviewed for impairment in the event that facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such an event, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset is compared to the asset's carrying amount, and if less than such carrying amount, recognize an impairment loss in an amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair value.

During 2016, the joint venture determined for its Bromont, Quebec outlet center that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of that property did not exceed the property's carrying value based on the reduction in the property's net operating income. Therefore, the joint venture recorded a $5.8 million non-cash impairment charge in its statement of operations, which equaled the excess of the property's carrying value over its fair value. The fair value was determined using the income approach whereby the joint venture considered the prevailing market income capitalization rates and stabilized net operating income projections. Our share of this impairment charge, $2.9 million, was recorded in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures in our consolidated statement of operations.


56





Savannah

In April 2015,May 2016, we opened an approximately 377,000 square footexpanded our outlet center in Savannah Georgia. As of December 31, 2015, our equity contributions totaled $45.8 million and our partner’s equity contributions totaled $8.3 million. Contributions we made in excess of our partners' equity contributions are considered preferred equity and earned a preferred rate of return equal to 8% from the date the contributions were made untilby approximately 42,000 square feet, bringing the outlet center’s grand opening in April 2015, and will earn 10% annually thereafter. Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all ofcenter's total gross leasable area to approximately 419,000 square feet.

We acquired our unreturned preferred equity contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our equity partner. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based at depreciated book value, our estimated economicpartners' interest in the venture was approximately 98%. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.

In May 2014, theSavannah joint venture closed on a construction loan within August 2016 and have consolidated the ability to borrow up to $97.7 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. In September 2015,property for financial reporting purposes since the loan maximum borrowing amount was increased to $100.9 million. The construction loan has a maturity date of May 21, 2017, with two, one -year extension options. As of December 31, 2015, the balance on the loan was $89.5 million. The additional $11.4 million is available for construction of the approximately 42,000 square foot expansion that is currently in process. We are providing development, management and marketing services to the joint venture; and with our partner, are jointly providing leasing services to the outlet center. acquisition date.

Westgate

In November 2012, we openedWe acquired our Westgate outlet center, locatedpartners' interest in Glendale, Arizona, which was developed through, and currently owned by, athe Westgate joint venture that was formed in May 2012.

During the first quarter of 2015, the joint venture completed the remaining 28,000 square feet of a 78,000 square foot expansion of the existing property which upon completion increased the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 411,000 square feet. Construction commenced on the expansion during the second quarter of 2014 and was funded with borrowings under the amended Westgate mortgage loan. The joint venture's amended and restated construction loan is fully funded with a balance of $62.0 million as of December 31, 2015. The loan initially matured in June 2015,2016 and duringhave consolidated the second quarter of 2015property for financial reporting purposes since the joint venture exercised the two year option to extend the maturity date of the loan to June 2017. We are providing property management, construction supervision, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.acquisition date.




56



Wisconsin Dells

In February 2015, we sold our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the outlet center located in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin for approximately $15.6 million, representing our share of the sales price totaling $27.7 million less our share of the outstanding debt, which totaled $12.1 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of approximately $13.7 million in the first quarter of 2015, which representsrepresented the difference between the carrying value of our equity method investment and the net proceeds received.

The following table details information regarding the outstanding debt of the unconsolidated joint ventures and guarantees of such debt provided by us as of December 31, 20152016 (dollars in millions):

Joint Venture Total Joint
Venture Debt
 Maturity Date Interest Rate Percent Guaranteed by the Company Maximum Guaranteed Amount by the Company Total Joint
Venture Debt
 Maturity Date Interest Rate Percent Guaranteed by the Company Maximum Guaranteed Amount by the Company
Charlotte $90.0
 November 2018 LIBOR + 1.45% 5.0% $4.5
 $90.0
 November 2018 LIBOR + 1.45% 5.0% $4.5
Columbus 85.0
 November 2019 LIBOR + 1.65% 10.0% 8.5
Galveston/Houston 65.0
 July 2017 LIBOR + 1.50% 5.0% 3.3
 65.0
 July 2017 LIBOR + 1.50% 5.0% 3.3
National Harbor(1)
 87.0
 November 2019 LIBOR + 1.65% 10.0% 8.7
 87.0
 November 2019 LIBOR + 1.65% 10.0% 8.7
RioCan Canada 11.3
 May 2020 5.75% 25.7% 2.9
Savannah (2)
 89.5
 May 2017 LIBOR + 1.65% 16.8% 15.0
Westgate 62.0
 June 2017 LIBOR + 1.75% % 
RioCan Canada (2)
 11.1
 May 2020 5.75% 27.0% 3.0
Debt origination costs (2.1)        
 $404.8
       $34.4
 $336.0
       $28.0
(1)100% completion guaranty; 10% principal guaranty.
(2)100% completion guaranty; $15.0 million principal guaranty.The joint venture debt amount includes premium recorded upon assumption of the debt during acquisition of approximately $482,000.

Fees we received for various services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures during 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013,2014, which we believe approximate current market rates, were recognized as follows (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Fees:            
Development and leasing $1,827
 $725
 $595
 $651
 $1,827
 $725
Loan guarantee 746
 463
 161
 452
 746
 463
Management and marketing 2,853
 2,403
 2,324
 2,744
 2,853
 2,403
Total Fees $5,426
 $3,591
 $3,080
 $3,847
 $5,426
 $3,591


57




Critical Accounting Estimates

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include its accounts and its wholly-ownedconsolidated subsidiaries, as well as the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include its accounts and its wholly-ownedconsolidated subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in real estate joint ventures in which we have a non-controlling ownership interest are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.


57The Company currently consolidates the Operating Partnership because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Operating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership that could be potentially significant.



In accordance with amended guidanceWe consolidate properties that are wholly owned or properties where we own less than 100% but we control. Control is determined using an evaluation based on accounting standards related to the consolidation of voting interest entities and variable interest entities which became effective January 1, 2010, we perform an analysis of all of our real estate("VIE"). For joint ventures that are determined to determine whether they qualify as variable interest entities, (“VIE”), and whetherbe a VIE, we consolidate the joint venture should be consolidated or accounted for as an equity method investment in an unconsolidated joint venture. Our analysis includes our judgment with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity and whetherwhere we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct the activities of athe VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We considerOur determination of the primary beneficiary considers various factors including the form of our ownership interest, our representation in an entity's governance, the size of our investment, our ability to participate in policy making decisions and the rights of the other investors to participate in the decision making process to replace us as manager and or liquidate the venture, if applicable. If we do not evaluate these joint ventures correctly under the amended guidance, we could significantly overstate or understate our financial condition and results of operations.

Investments in real estate joint ventures that we do not control but may exercise significant influence on are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our equity in the venture's net income or loss, cash contributions, distributions and other adjustments required under the equity method of accounting.

Acquisition of Real Estate

We allocate the purchase price of acquisitions based on the fair value of land, building, tenant improvements, debt and deferred lease costs and other intangibles, such as the value of leases with above or below market rents, origination costs associated with the in-place leases, and the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships, if any. We depreciate the amount allocated to building, deferred lease costs and other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from 3 to 33 years. The values of the above and below market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. The values of below market leases that are considered to have renewal periods with below market rents are amortized over the remaining term of the associated lease plus the renewal periods when the renewal is deemed probable to occur. The value associated with in-place leases is amortized over the remaining lease term and tenant relationships is amortized over the expected term, which includes an estimated probability of the lease renewal. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the contractual termination date of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related deferred lease costs is written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date). We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information.

If we do not allocate appropriately to the separate components of rental property, deferred lease costs and other intangibles or if we do not estimate correctly the total value of the property or the useful lives of the assets, our computation of depreciation and amortization expense may be significantly understated or overstated.


58




Cost Capitalization

We capitalize costs incurred for the construction and development of properties, including interest, real estate taxes and salaries and related costs associated with employees directly involved. Capitalization of costs commences at the time the development of the property becomes probable and ceases when the property is substantially completed and ready for its intended use. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and ready for its intended use upon the completion of tenant improvements. We cease capitalization on the portion that is substantially completed and occupied or held available for occupancy, and capitalize only those costs associated with the portion under construction. The amount of salaries and related costs capitalized for the construction and development of properties is based on our estimate of the amount of costs directly related to the construction or development of these assets. Interest costs are capitalized during periods of active construction for qualified expenditures based upon interest rates in place during the construction period until construction is substantially complete. This includes interest incurred on funds invested in or advanced to unconsolidated joint ventures with qualifying development activities.

Deferred charges includes deferred lease costs and other intangible assets consisting of fees and costs incurred to originate operating leases and are amortized over the expected lease term. Deferred lease costs capitalized includes amounts paid to third-party brokers and salaries and related costs of employees directly involved in originating leases. The amount of salaries and related costs capitalized is based on our estimate of the time and amount of costs directly related to originating leases.

If we incorrectly estimate the amount of costs to capitalize, we could significantly overstate or understate our financial condition and results of operations.


58




Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Rental property held and used by us is reviewed for impairment in the event that facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such an event, we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the asset's carrying amount, and if less than such carrying amount, recognize an impairment loss in an amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. If we do not recognize impairments at appropriate times and in appropriate amounts, our consolidated balance sheet may overstate the value of our long-lived assets. Fair value is determined using an income approach whereby we consider the prevailing market income capitalization rates and stabilized net operating income projections. We believe thatrecognized no impairment existed atlosses for our consolidated properties during the years ended December 31, 2015.2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, for discussion of the impairment of our unconsolidated joint venture at the Bromont, Quebec outlet center during 2016.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if management's estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investments, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the value of the investment. Our estimates of value for each joint venture investment are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, estimated hold period, terminal capitalization rates, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates and operating costs of the property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, the values estimated by us in our impairment analysis may not be realized.

Revenue Recognition

Base rentals are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As a provision of a tenant lease, if we make a cash payment to the tenant for purposes other than funding the construction of landlord assets, we defer the amount of such payments as a lease incentive. We amortize lease incentives as a reduction of base rental revenue over the term of the lease. Substantially all leases contain provisions which provide additional rents based on each tenants' sales volume (“percentage rentals”) and reimbursement of the tenants' share of advertising and promotion, common area maintenance, insurance and real estate tax expenses. Percentage rentals are recognized when specified targets that trigger the contingent rent are met. Expense reimbursements are recognized in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. Payments received from the early termination of leases are recognized as revenue from the time payment is receivable until the tenant vacates the space.

59






New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. The guidance in the new standard is limitedSee Note 2 to the presentation of debt issuance costs. The standard does not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. Early adoption is permitted forconsolidated financial statements that have not been previouslyfor information on new accounting pronouncements issued. The new guidance will be applied on a retrospective basis. The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We expect that the adoption of this standard during the first quarter of 2016 will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, but may result in additional disclosures.


59



In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide certain disclosures when it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ended December 31, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (the "Final Standard"). Under the Final Standard, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations (e.g., a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business or a major equity method investment) will be presented as discontinued operations. Under previous GAAP, companies that sold a single investment property were generally required to report the sale as a discontinued operation, which required the companies to reclassify earnings from continuing operations for all periods presented. The Final Standard is effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public entities with calendar year ends. The FASB will permit early adoption of the Final Standard, beginning in the first quarter of 2014, but only for disposals or classifications as held for sale that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. We early adopted the standard in the first quarter of 2014. See Note 4 Disposition of Properties and Properties Held for Sale for further information.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are required to adopt the new pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using one of two retrospective application methods. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on our consolidated financial statements.

Supplemental Earnings MeasuresNON-GAAP SUPPLEMENTAL MEASURES

Funds fromFrom Operations

Funds From Operations ("FFO") is a widely used measure of the operating performance for real estate companies that supplements net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP. We determine FFO based on the definition set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), of which we are a member. FFO represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) before extraordinary items and gains (losses) on sale or disposal of depreciable operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, impairment losses on depreciable real estate of consolidated real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, including depreciation and amortization, and impairment losses on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures driven by a measurable decrease in the fair value of depreciable real estate held by the unconsolidated joint ventures.

FFO is intended to exclude historical cost depreciation of real estate as required by GAAP which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income.

We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance. In addition, a portion of cash bonus compensation to certain members of management is based on our FFO or Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO"), which is described in the section below. We believe it is useful for investors to have enhanced transparency into how we evaluate our performance and that of our management. In addition, FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc., of which we are a member,NAREIT has encouraged its member companies to report their FFO as a supplemental, industry-wide standard measure of REIT operating performance.


60



FFO has significant limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

FFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

FFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and FFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

FFO, which includes discontinued operations, may not be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

Other companies in our industry may calculate FFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, FFO should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or our dividend paying capacity. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO only as a supplemental measure.

Below is a reconciliation of net income to FFO for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 as well as other data for those respective periods (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts):
60
  2015 2014 2013
Funds from Operations:      
Net income $222,168
 $78,152
 $113,321
Adjusted for:      
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - consolidated 102,515
 100,961
 94,515
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - unconsolidated joint ventures 20,053
 12,212
 12,419
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (120,447) (7,513) 
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture 
 
 (26,002)
Funds from operations 224,289
 183,812
 194,253
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 268
 (185) (202)
Allocation of FFO to participating securities (1)
 (2,408) (3,653) (2,025)
Funds from operations available to common shareholders and noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership $222,149
 $179,974
 $192,026
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.:      
Weighted average common shares outstanding (2) (3)
 99,838
 98,954
 99,129
Dilutive funds from operations per share $2.23
 $1.82
 $1.94
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership:      
Weighted average Operating Partnership units outstanding (2)
 99,838
 98,954
 99,129
Dilutive funds from operations per unit $2.23
 $1.82
 $1.94
(1)Notional units granted in 2010 were converted into 933,769 restricted common shares in January 2014 and vested on December 31, 2014. The restricted common shares were considered participating securities through the vesting date.
(2)Includes the dilutive effect of options, restricted common shares not considered participating securities, and notional units.
(3)Assumes the Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by the noncontrolling interests are exchanged for common shares of the Company. Each Class A common limited partnership unit is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's REIT status.


61



Adjusted Funds fromFrom Operations

We use AFFO when certain material, unplanned transactions occur as a factor in evaluating management's performance and to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies, and may use AFFO when determining incentive compensation. We present AFFO, as a supplemental measure of our performance. We define AFFO as FFO further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance. These further adjustments are itemized in the table below. You are encouraged to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis. In evaluating AFFO you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of AFFO should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

We present AFFO because we believe it assists investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we believe it is useful for investors to have enhanced transparency into how we evaluate management’s performance and the effectiveness of our business strategies. We use AFFO when certain material, unplanned transactions occur as a factor in evaluating management's performance and to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies, and may use AFFO when determining incentive compensation.

AFFO has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations are:

AFFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

AFFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and AFFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

AFFO does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

Other companies in our industry may calculate AFFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, AFFO should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using AFFO only as a supplemental measure.


6261




Below is a reconciliation of net income to FFO available to common shareholders and AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 as well as other data for those respective periodsavailable to common shareholders (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts):(1)
  2015 2014 2013
Adjusted Funds from Operations:      
Funds from operations $224,289
 $183,812
 $194,253
Adjusted for non-core items:      
Acquisition costs 
 7
 1,203
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 2,365
 
Demolition costs 
 
 140
Casualty gain 
 (486) 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt 
 13,140
 
Reversal of share-based compensation expense (1)
 (731) 
 
AFFO adjustments from unconsolidated joint ventures (2)
 
 237
 (7,422)
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) 223,558
 199,075
 188,174
AFFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 268
 (185) (202)
Allocation of AFFO to participating securities (3)
 (2,400) (3,955) (1,958)
Adjusted funds from operations available to common shareholders and noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership $221,426
 $194,935
 $186,014
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.:      
Weighted average common shares outstanding (4)(5)
 99,838
 98,954
 99,129
Dilutive adjusted funds from operations per share $2.22
 $1.97
 $1.88
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership:      
Weighted average Operating Partnership units outstanding (4)
 99,838
 98,954
 99,129
Dilutive adjusted funds from operations per unit $2.22
 $1.97
 $1.88
  2016 2015 2014
Net income $204,329
 $222,168
 $78,152
Adjusted for:      
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - consolidated 113,645
 102,515
 100,961
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - unconsolidated joint ventures 18,910
 20,053
 12,212
Impairment charges - unconsolidated joint ventures 2,919
 
 
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (4,887) (120,447) (7,513)
Gain on previously held interests in acquired joint ventures (95,516) 
 
FFO 239,400
 224,289
 183,812
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships (348) 268
 (185)
Allocation of earnings to participating securities (2,192) (2,408) (3,653)
FFO available to common shareholders  (1)
 $236,860
 $222,149
 $179,974
As further adjusted for:      
Compensation related to director and executive officer terminations  (2)
 1,180
 (731) 7
Acquisition costs 487
 
 2,365
Demolition costs 441
 
 
Casualty gain 
 
 (486)
Gain on early extinguishment of debt 
 
 13,140
Gain on sale of outparcel (1,418) 
 
Write-off of debt discount due to repayment of debt prior to maturity  (3)
 882
 
 
Impact of above adjustments to the allocation of earnings to participating securities (15) 8
 (302)
AFFO adjustments from unconsolidated joint ventures 
 
 237
AFFO available to common shareholders (1)
 $238,417
 $221,426
 $194,935
FFO available to common shareholders per share - diluted (1)
 $2.36
 $2.23
 $1.82
AFFO available to common shareholders per share - diluted (1)
 $2.37
 $2.22
 $1.97
Weighted Average Shares:      
Basic weighted average common shares 95,102
 94,698
 93,769
Effect of notional units 175
 
 
Effect of outstanding options and restricted common shares 68
 61
 70
Diluted weighted average common shares (for earnings per share computations) 95,345
 94,759
 93,839
Exchangeable operating partnership units 5,053
 5,079
 5,115
Diluted weighted average common shares (for FFO and AFFO per share computations) (1)
 100,398
 99,838
 98,954
(1)RepresentsAssumes the Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by the noncontrolling interests are exchanged for common shares of the Company. Each Class A common limited partnership unit is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's REIT status.
(2)For the year ended December 31, 2016, represents cash severance and accelerated vesting of restricted shares associated with the departure of an officer in August 2016 and the accelerated vesting of restricted shares due to the death of a director in February 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, represents the reversal of certain share-based compensation awards previously recognized on awards not expected to vest due to the announcement ofthat the Company’s then Chief Financial Officer's pending retirementOfficer would retire in May 2016.
(2)Includes our share of acquisition costs, litigation settlement proceeds, abandoned development costs and gain on early extinguishment of debt from unconsolidated joint ventures. For the year ended December 31, 2013, includes a gain on early extinguishment of debt of $4.6 million and litigation settlement proceeds of $3.2 million.
(3)Notional units granted in 2010 were converted into 933,769 restricted common shares inDue to the January 2014 and vested on December 31, 2014. The restricted common shares were considered participating securities through the vesting date.
(4)Includes the dilutive effect of options, restricted shares not considered participating securities, notional units and exchangeable notes.
(5)Assumes the Class A common limited partnership units28, 2016 early repayment of the Operating Partnership held$150 million mortgage secured by the noncontrolling interest are exchanged for common shares of the Company.Deer Park, New York property, which was scheduled to mature August 30, 2018.







62




Portfolio Net Operating Income and Same Center Net Operating Income-Cash BasisNOI

We present Same Center Net Operating Income - Cash Basis (“portfolio net operating income ("Portfolio NOI") and Same Center NOI - Cash Basis”) as a supplemental measuremeasures of our operating performance. We define Same CenterPortfolio NOI - Cash Basisrepresents our property level net operating income which is defined as total operating revenues less property operating expenses for the properties that were operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods and which were not acquired, renovated or subject to a material non-recurring event, such as a natural disaster, during the comparable reporting periods. Same Center NOI - Cash Basis also excludes termination fees and non-cash adjustments including straight-line rent, net above and below market rent amortization and gains or losses on the sale of outparcels recognized during the periods presented.


63



We define Same Center NOI - Cash Basis isas Portfolio NOI for the properties that were operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods and which were not acquired or subject to a material expansion or non-recurring event, such as a natural disaster, during the comparable reporting periods.

We believe Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI are non-GAAP metrics used by industry analysts, investors and management to measure the operating performance of our properties because it provides athey provide performance measuremeasures directly related to the revenues and expenses involved in owning and operating real estate assets and providesprovide a perspective not immediately apparent from net income, FFO or FFO.AFFO. Because Same Center NOI - Cash Basis excludes properties developed, redeveloped, acquired and sold; as well as non-cash adjustments, gains or losses on the sale of outparcels and termination rents; it highlights operating trends such as occupancy levels, rental rates and operating costs on properties that were operational for both comparable periods. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating Portfolio NOI and Same Center Net Operating Income,NOI, and accordingly, our Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI - Cash Basis may not be comparable to other REITs.

Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI - Cash Basis should not be viewedconsidered alternatives to net income (loss) or as an alternative measureindicator of our financial performance since it doesthey do not reflect the entire operations of our entire portfolio, nor does itdo they reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, other non-property income and losses, and the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, or trends in development and construction activities which are significant economic costs and activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Because of these limitations, Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI should not be viewed in isolation to or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI only as supplemental measures.



63




Below is a reconciliation of net income before equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures to Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI - Cash Basisfor the consolidated portfolio (in thousands):
  2015 2014
Same Center Net Operating Income    
Income before equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures $210,684
 $69,099
Interest expense 54,188
 57,931
Loss on early extinguishment of debt 
 13,140
Interest and other income 36
 (794)
Gain on sale of real estate (120,447) (7,513)
Operating income 144,461
 131,863
Adjusted to exclude:    
Depreciation and amortization 103,936
 102,432
Other non-property income and losses (2,226) (2,194)
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 2,365
Acquisition costs 
 7
General and administrative expenses 44,469
 44,469
Non-cash adjustments and termination rents (1)
 (8,043) (4,608)
Non-same center and other NOI (2)
 (18,268) (18,932)
Same Center Net Operating Income - Cash Basis $264,329
 $255,402
  2016 2015
Net income $204,329
 $222,168
Adjusted to exclude:    
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (10,872) (11,484)
Interest expense 60,669
 54,188
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (6,305) (120,447)
Gain on previously held interests in acquired joint ventures (95,516) 
Other non-operating (income) expense (1,028) 36
Depreciation and amortization 115,357
 103,936
Other non-property (income) expenses (23) (1,317)
Acquisition costs 487
 
Demolition Costs 441
 
Corporate general and administrative expenses 46,012
 43,966
Non-cash adjustments (1)
 (3,613) (3,792)
Termination rents (3,599) (4,576)
Portfolio NOI 306,339
 282,678
Non-same center NOI (2)
 (33,152) (18,340)
Same Center NOI $273,187
 $264,338
(1)
Non-cash items include straight-line rent, net above and below market rent amortization and gains or losses on outparcel sales.sales, as applicable.
(2)
Excluded from Same Center NOI - Cash Basis: Foxwoods outlet center, which opened in May of 2015; Grand Rapids outlet center, which opened in July of 2015; Southaven outlet center, which opened in NOI:
Outlet centers opened:Outlet centers sold:Outlet centers acquired:
Daytona BeachNovember 2015, Lincoln City outlet center, which was sold in December 2014; 2016Kittery I & IISeptember 2015Glendale (Westgate)June 2016
FoxwoodsMay 2015Tuscola and September 2015SavannahAugust 2016
Grand RapidsJuly 2015West Branch outlet centers, which were sold in September 2015; 2015
SouthavenNovember 2015Barstow outlet center, which was sold in October 2015; and 2015
Fort Myers outlet center, which was sold in January 2016.2016

Economic Conditions and Outlook

The majority of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses for the escalation of base rent and clauses enabling us to receive percentage rentals based on tenants' gross sales (above predetermined levels, which we believe often are lower than traditional retail industry standards) which generally increase as prices rise. Most of the leases require the tenant to pay their share of property operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and advertising and promotion, thereby reducing exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.


64



While we believe outlet stores will continue to be a profitable and fundamental distribution channel for many brand name manufacturers, some retail formats are more successful than others. As is typical in the retail industry, certain tenants have closed, or will close, certain stores by terminating their lease prior to its natural expiration or as a result of filing for protection under bankruptcy laws.


64




Due to the relatively short-term nature of our tenants' leases, a significant portion of the leases in our portfolio come up for renewal each year. During 2015,2016, approximately 1.51.4 million square feet, or 13%12%, of our then owned, consolidated portfolio came up for renewal and 1.41.6 million square feet, or 12%13%, of our current consolidated portfolio will come up for renewal in 2016.2017. During 2015,2016, we renewed 84%85% of the square feet that came up for renewal with the existing tenants at a 20%an 18% increase in the average base rental rate compared to the expiring rate. We also re-tenanted 444,000384,000 square feet at a 29%27% increase in the average base rental rate. In addition, we continue to attract and retain additional tenants. However, there can be no assurance that we can achieve similar increases in base rental rates. In addition, if we were unable to successfully renew or release a significant amount of this space on favorable economic terms, the loss in rent could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our outlet centers typically include well-known, national, brand name companies. By maintaining a broad base of well-known tenants and a geographically diverse portfolio of properties located across the United States and Canada, we reduce our operating and leasing risks. No one tenant (including affiliates) accounts for more than 7.5%7.6% of our square feet or 6.0%6.2% of our combined base and percentage rental revenues. Accordingly, although we can give no assurance, we do not expect any material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition as a result of leases to be renewed or stores to be released. As of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, occupancy at our consolidated outlet centers was 97%98% and 98%97%, respectively.


ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We may periodically enter into certain interest rate protection and interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert existing floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on investments in outlet centers that are located in Canada. Our currency exposure is concentrated in the Canadian Dollar. We typically reinvest net cash flowCash flows received from our Canadian joint ventures are either reinvested to fund futureongoing Canadian development activity.activity, if applicable, or converted to US dollars and utilized to repay amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit. We believe this strategy mitigates some of the risk of our initial investment and our exposure to changes in foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge currency translation exposures.
 
In April 2016, we entered into four separate interest rate swap agreements, effective April 13, 2016 that fix the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.03% on notional amounts totaling $175.0 million through January 1, 2021. In addition, in October 2013, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $150.0 million to reduce our floating rate debt exposure. The interest rate swap agreements fix the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.30% and mature in August 2018. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements represents the estimated receipts or payments that would be made to terminate the agreement. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the fair value of these contracts is a liabilityan asset of $616,000.$4.0 million. The fair value is based on dealer quotes, considering current interest rates, remaining term to maturity and our credit standing.


65



As of December 31, 2015, 36%2016, 11% of our outstanding debt, had variable interest rates, excluding variable rate debt with interest rate protection agreements in place, had variable interest rates and therefore were subject to market fluctuations. An increase in the LIBOR index of 100 basis points would result in an increase of approximately $5.6$1.9 million in interest expense on an annual basis. The information presented herein is merely an estimate and has limited predictive value.  As a result, the ultimate effect upon our operating results of interest rate fluctuations will depend on the interest rate exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time and future changes in the level of interest rates.

The estimated fair value and recorded value of our debt consisting of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, secured mortgages and unsecured lines of credit were as follows (in thousands):

 December 31, 2015
 December 31, 2014
 December 31, 2016
 December 31, 2015
Fair value of debt $1,615,833
 $1,493,519
 $1,704,644
 $1,615,833
Recorded value of debt $1,563,806
 $1,443,194
 $1,687,866
 $1,551,924

65





A 100 basis point increase from prevailing interest rates at December 31, 20152016 and December 31, 20142015 would result in a decrease in fair value of total debt of approximately $69.1 million and $50.3 million, and $58.3 million, respectively. WithRefer to Note 12 to the exceptionconsolidated financial statements for a description of our methodology in calculating the unsecured term loan and unsecured linesestimated fair value of credit, that have variable rates and considered at market value, fair values of the senior notes and mortgage loans are determined using discounted cash flow analysis with an interest rate or credit spread similar to that of current market borrowing arrangements. Because the Company's senior unsecured notes are publicly traded with limited trading volume, these instruments are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy. In contrast, mortgage loans are classified as Level 3 given the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation.debt. Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on the disposition of the financial instruments.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this Item is set forth on the pages indicated in Item 15(a) below.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The information required by this Item 9 was previously reported in the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K and Form 8-K/A amending such Form 8-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2015.2015 and March 2, 2016, respectively.



66




ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

(a)Evaluation of disclosure control procedures.

The Chief Executive Officer, Steven B. Tanger (Principal Executive Officer), and Chief Financial Officer, Frank C. Marchisello Jr.James F. Williams (Principal Financial Officer), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures on December 31, 20152016 and concluded that, as of that date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information the Company is required to disclose in its filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)Management's report on internal control over financial reporting.

Internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining policies and procedures designed to maintain the adequacy of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, including those policies and procedures that:

(1)Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

(2)Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

(3)Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Company's management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152016 based on the criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on our assessment and those criteria, the Company's management has concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 20152016.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 

The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152016 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

(c)
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20152016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

67




Tanger Properties Limited Partnership

(a)Evaluation of disclosure control procedures.

The Chief Executive Officer, Steven B. Tanger (Principal Executive Officer), and Vice President and Treasurer, Frank C. Marchisello Jr.James F. Williams (Principal Financial Officer) of Tanger GP Trust, sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures on December 31, 20152016 and concluded that, as of that date, the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information the registrant is required to disclose in its filings with the Commission under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the registrant's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)Management's report on internal control over financial reporting.

Internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Operating Partnership's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Operating Partnership's board of trustees, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  The Operating Partnership's management, with the participation of the Operating Partnership's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining policies and procedures designed to maintain the adequacy of the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting, including those policies and procedures that:

(1)Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Operating Partnership;

(2)Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Operating Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trustees of the Operating Partnership; and

(3)Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Operating Partnership's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Operating Partnership's management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152016 based on the criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on our assessment and those criteria, the Operating Partnership's management has concluded that the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 20152016.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 

The effectiveness of the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152016 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.




68




(c)
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20152016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

All information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 20152016 was reported.

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Report in that the Company will file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, or the Proxy Statement, not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report, and certain information included therein is incorporated herein by reference. Only those sections of the Proxy Statement which specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated by reference.

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information concerning the Company's directors required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information concerning the Company's executive officers required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section at the end of Part I, entitled “Executive Officers of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.”

The information regarding compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information concerning our Company Code of Ethics required by this Item, which is posted on our website at www.tangeroutlet.com, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this annual report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

The information concerning our corporate governance required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.



69





ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS.

The information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this Item is incorporated by reference herein to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The table below provides information as of December 31, 20152016 with respect to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance. For each common share issued by the Company, the Operating Partnership issues one corresponding unit of partnership interest to the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries. Therefore, when the Company grants an equity based award, the Operating Partnership treats each award as having been granted by the Operating Partnership. In the discussion below, the term "we" refers to the Company and the Operating Partnership together and the term "common shares" is meant to also include corresponding units of the Operating Partnership.    
Plan Category 
(a)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)
 
(b)
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
 
(c)
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (2)
 
(a)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)
 
(b)
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
 
(c)
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (2)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 954,700
 $30.32
 2,304,732
 1,055,255
 $30.46
 2,082,992
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
 
 
 
Total 954,700
 $30.32
 2,304,732
 1,055,255
 $30.46
 2,082,992
(1)Includes (a) 318,400242,200 common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options (104,700(115,600 of which are vested and exercisable), (b) 329,700184,455 restricted common shares that mayto be issued in January 2017 that were earned under the 2014 Outperformance Plan (the "2014 OPP") upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, and, (c) 306,600259,160 restricted common shares that may be issued under the 2015 Outperformance Plan (the "2015 OPP") upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.conditions, and (d) 315,561 restricted common shares that may be issued under the 2016 Outperformance Plan (the "2016 OPP") upon the satisfaction of certain conditions Because there is no exercise price associated with the 2014, 2015 and 20152016 OPP awards, such restricted common shares are not included in the weighted average exercise price calculation.
(2)Represents common shares available for issuance under the Amended and Restated Incentive Award Plan. Under the Amended and Restated Incentive Award Plan, the Company may award restricted common shares, restricted share units, performance awards, dividend equivalents, deferred shares, deferred share units, share payments profit interests, and share appreciation rights.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


70




ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Company's 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) (1) and (2) Documents filed as a part of this report:

(a) (1) Financial Statements
ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirms (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.)
ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirms (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)
  
Financial Statements of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 20152016 and 20142015
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
  
Financial Statements of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership 
Consolidated Balance Sheets-DecemberSheets - December 31, 20152016 and 20142015
Consolidated Statements of Operations-Operations - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
Consolidated Statements of Equity-Equity - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III 
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

All other schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is given in the above-listed financial statements or notes thereto.


71




3.Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.)
   
3.1A Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated May 29, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.)
   
3.1B Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated August 20, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.)
   
3.1C Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated September 30, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.)
   
3.1D Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated November 10, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2005.)
   
3.1E Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated June 13, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.)
   
3.1F Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated August 27, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits of the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2008).
   
3.1G Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. dated May 18, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits of the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.)
   
3.1 H Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., dated May 24, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Form S-3 dated June 7, 2012.)
   
3.2 By-laws of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. restated to reflect all amendments through May 18, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Form S-3 dated June 7, 2012.)
   
3.3 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership dated August 30, 2013. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.)
   
4.1 Form of Senior Indenture. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 1996.)
   
4.1A Form of Fourth Supplemental Indenture (to Senior Indenture) dated November 4, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
   
4.1B Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture (to Senior Indenture) dated July 2, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on July 2, 2009.)
   
4.1C Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture (to Senior Indenture) dated June 7, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2010.)
   
4.1D Form of Eighth Supplemental Indenture (to Senior Indenture) dated November 25, 2013. (Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 25, 2013.)
   

72




4.1E Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture (to Senior Indenture) dated November 21, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 21, 2014.)
4.1FTenth Supplemental Indenture (Supplement to Indenture dated as of March 1, 1996) dated August 8, 2016. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with the Company's and Operating Partnership's Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2016).
4.1GFirst Amendment to Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated October 13, 2016. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with the Company's and Operating Partnership's Report on Form 8-K dated October 13, 2016).
   
10.1 * Incentive Award Plan of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (Amended and Restated as of April 4, 2014) (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.)
   
10.2 * Form of Non-Qualified Share Option Agreement between Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and certain employees. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.)
   
10.3 * 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Steven B. Tanger dated February 28, 2012.December 14, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 29, 2012.December 19, 2016.)

   
10.4 * Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., as of December 29, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2008.)
   
10.5 * Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Lisa J. Morrison, as of December 29, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2008.)
   
10.6 * Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Carrie A. Geldner, as of December 29, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.)
   
10.7 * Employment Agreement for Chad D. Perry, dated as of December 12, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.)
   
10.8 * Employment Agreement for Thomas E. McDonough, dated August 23, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on form 8-K dated August 23, 2010.)
   
10.9 * Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for James F. Williams, as of December 29, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.)
   
10.10 * Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Virginia R. Summerell, as of December 29, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.)
   
10.11 * Employment Agreement for Manuel O. Jessup, dated October 5, 2012.(Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.)
10.12 *Employment Agreement for Charles A. Worsham, dated July 17, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.)
   
10.1310.12 Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership and Stanley K. Tanger. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed May 27, 1993, as amended.)
   
10.13A10.12A Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership and Stanley K. Tanger. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.)
   

73




10.13B10.12B Second Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership and Stanley K. Tanger dated September 4, 2002. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.)
   
10.13C10.12C Third Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership and Stanley K. Tanger dated December 5, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.)
   
10.13D10.12D Fourth Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership and Stanley K. Tanger dated August 8, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated August 9, 2006.)
   
10.13E10.12E Fifth Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, The Tanger Family Limited Partnership and Stanley K. Tanger dated August 10, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2009.)
   
10.1410.13 Registration Rights Agreement amount Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and DPSW Deer Park LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.)
   
10.1510.14 Agreement Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed May 27, 1993, as amended.)
   
10.1610.15 Assignment and Assumption Agreement among Stanley K. Tanger, Stanley K. Tanger & Company, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership, the Operating Partnership and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed May 27, 1993, as amended.)
   
10.1710.16 COROC Holdings, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement dated October 3, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 8, 2003.)
   
10.1810.17 Form of Shopping Center Management Agreement between owners of COROC Holdings, LLC and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 8, 2003.)
   
10.1910.18 * Form of Restricted Share Agreement between the Company and certain Officers. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.)
10.2010.19 * Form of Restricted Share Agreement between the Company and certain Officers with certain performance criteria vesting. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.)
   
10.20A10.19A * Form of Amendment to Restricted Share Agreement between the Company and certain Officers with certain performance criteria vesting. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.)
   
10.2110.20 * Form of Restricted Share Agreement between the Company and certain Directors. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.)
   
10.2210.21 * Restricted Share Agreement between the Company and Steven. B. Tanger dated February 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.)
   
10.2310.22 * Form of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Notional Unit Award Agreement between the Company and certain Officers. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.)
   
10.2410.23 * Form of 2013 Outperformance Plan Notional Unit Award agreement. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.)

74




10.25*
10.24* Form of 2014 Outperformance Plan Notional Unit Award agreement. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.)
   
10.26*10.25* Form of 2015 Outperformance Plan Notional Unit Award agreement. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.)
10.26*
Form of 2016 Outperformance Plan Notional Unit Award agreement. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, filed May 4, 2016.)

   
10.27 * Director Deferred Share Program of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.)
   
10.28 
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2011, among Tanger Properties Limited Partnership, as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and The Other Lenders Party Hereto, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Well Fargo Securities, LLC, and US Bank National Association, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers, Well Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, US Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, Suntrust Bank, as Documentation Agent and Branch Banking and Trust Company, as Documentation Agent. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 15, 2011.)

   
10.29 Modification Agreement, dated October 24, 2013 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2011, among Tanger Properties Limited Partnership, as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and The Other Lenders Party Hereto, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Well Fargo Securities, LLC, and US Bank National Association, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers, Well Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, US Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, Suntrust Bank, as Documentation Agent and Branch Banking and Trust Company, as Documentation Agent. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.)
   
10.30 Term loan credit agreement dated February 24, 2012 between Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Bank Securities, LLC, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.m and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers, SunTrust Bank and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, Regions Bank, as Documentation Agent and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Sole Bookrunner. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 29, 2012.)
10.31Letter Agreements between the Company and Jack Africk dated February 6, 2014 and May 16, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.)
10.32Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2015 among Tanger Properties Limited Partnership, as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and The Other Lenders Party Thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Well Fargo Securities, LLC, and US Bank National Association, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers, Well Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, US Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, Suntrust Bank, as Documentation Agent, Branch Banking and Trust Company, as Documentation Agent, PNC Bank, National Association as Document Agent, and Regions Bank as Managing Agent.Agent (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 23, 2016).
10.31Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement dated October 29, 2015 between Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Bank Securities, LLC, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.m and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers, SunTrust Bank and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, Regions Bank, as Documentation Agent and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Sole Bookrunner, and the other lenders party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 15, 2016.)
10.32First Amendment to Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement dated as of April 13, 2016 between Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 15, 2016).

75




10.33Letter Agreements between the Company and Jack Africk dated February 6, 2014 and May 16, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's and Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.)
   
12.1 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends.
   
12.2 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions.
   
21.1 List of Subsidiaries of the Company.
   
21.2 List of Subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership.

75



23.1Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
   
23.123.2Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
23.3 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
   
23.223.4 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
   
31.1 Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
   
31.2 Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
   
31.3 Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
   
31.4 Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
   
32.1 Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
   
32.2 Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
   
32.3 Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
   
32.4 Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
   
101.1 The following Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership financial information for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

76





ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

N/A

77




SIGNATURES of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. 
   
By:/s/ Steven B. Tanger 
 Steven B. Tanger 
 President and Chief Executive Officer 

February 23, 20162017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature 
 Title Date
/s/ William G. BentonThomas J. Reddin    
William G. BentonThomas J. Reddin Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Steven B. Tanger    
Steven B. Tanger Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 23, 2016
/s/ Frank C. Marchisello Jr.
Frank C. Marchisello Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ James F. Williams    
James F. Williams Senior Vice President and Chief AccountingFinancial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) February 23, 20162017
/s/ William G. Benton
William G. BentonDirectorFebruary 23, 2017
     
/s/ Jeffrey B. Citrin    
Jeffrey B. Citrin Director February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ David B. Henry    
David B. Henry Director February 23, 2016
/s/ Thomas J. Reddin
Thomas J. ReddinDirectorFebruary 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Thomas E. Robinson    
Thomas E. Robinson Director February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Bridget M. Ryan-Berman    
Bridget M. Ryan-Berman Director February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Allan L. Schuman    
Allan L. Schuman Director February 23, 20162017


78








77



SIGNATURES of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
   
By:Tanger GP Trust, its sole general partner 
   
By:/s/ Steven B. Tanger 
 Steven B. Tanger 
 President and Chief Executive Officer 

February 23, 20162017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature 
 Title Date
/s/ Steven B. Tanger   ��
Steven B. Tanger Chairman of the Board of Trustees, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 23, 2016
/s/ Frank C. Marchisello Jr.
Frank C. Marchisello Jr.Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ James F. Williams    
James F. Williams Vice President and Assistant Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ William G. Benton    
William G. Benton Trustee February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Jeffrey B. Citrin    
Jeffrey B. Citrin Trustee February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ David B. Henry    
David B. Henry Trustee February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Thomas J. Reddin    
Thomas J. Reddin Trustee February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Thomas E. Robinson    
Thomas E. Robinson Trustee February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Bridget M. Ryan-Berman    
Bridget M. Ryan-Berman Trustee February 23, 20162017
     
/s/ Allan L. Schuman    
Allan L. Schuman Trustee February 23, 20162017

7879





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.:

Greensboro, North Carolina
In our opinion,We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity, and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and its subsidiaries atDecember 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion,2016. Our audit also included the financial statement schedules appearing under Item 15 (a)(2)present fairly,schedule listed in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction withIndex at item 15(a)(2). We also have audited the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effectiveCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Commission. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules,schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinionsan opinion on these financial statements on theand financial statement schedules,schedule and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our auditsaudit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii)(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii)(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of itsthe inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not preventbe prevented or detect misstatements.detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 23, 20162017


F-1





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the PartnerBoard of Directors and Shareholders of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership:Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanger Properties Limited PartnershipFactory Outlet Centers, Inc. and its subsidiaries atas of December 31, 2015, and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules appearing under Item 15 (a)(2)for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015 present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. AlsoThese financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our opinion,audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, NC
February 23, 2017



F-2




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trustees and the General Partner of
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Greensboro, North Carolina
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries (the “Operating Partnership”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at item 15(a)(2). We also have audited the Operating Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effectivePartnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Commission. The Operating Partnership's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules,schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinionsan opinion on these financial statements on theand financial statement schedules,schedule and an opinion on the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our auditsaudit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii)(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii)(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of itsthe inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not preventbe prevented or detect misstatements.detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, the Operating Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 23, 20162017


F-2F-3





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Partner of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership:

In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015 present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, NC
February 23, 2017


F-4
























[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

F-3F-5






TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
  December 31,
  2015 2014
Assets  
  
Rental property    
Land $240,267
 $217,994
Buildings, improvements and fixtures 2,249,417
 1,947,083
Construction in progress 23,533
 98,526
  2,513,217
 2,263,603
Accumulated depreciation (748,341) (662,236)
Total rental property, net 1,764,876
 1,601,367
Cash and cash equivalents 21,558
 16,875
Restricted cash 121,306
 
Rental property held for sale 
 46,005
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures 201,083
 208,050
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net 127,089
 140,883
Deferred debt origination costs, net 11,882
 12,126
Prepaids and other assets 78,913
 72,354
Total assets $2,326,707
 $2,097,660
Liabilities and Equity    
Liabilities    
Debt    
Senior, unsecured notes (net of discount of $5,747 and $6,426, respectively) $794,253
 $793,574
Unsecured term loans (net of discount of $81 and $241, respectively) 267,419
 267,259
Mortgages payable (including premiums of $2,448 and $3,031, respectively) 311,834
 271,361
Unsecured lines of credit 190,300
 111,000
Total debt 1,563,806
 1,443,194
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 97,396
 69,558
Deferred financing obligation 28,388
 28,388
Other liabilities 31,085
 32,634
Total liabilities 1,720,675
 1,573,774
Commitments and contingencies 
 
Equity    
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.    
Common shares, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 95,880,825 and 95,509,781 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively 959
 955
Paid in capital 806,379
 791,566
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income (195,486) (281,679)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (36,715) (14,023)
Equity attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 575,137
 496,819
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests:    
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 30,309
 26,417
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 586
 650
Total equity 606,032
 523,886
Total liabilities and equity $2,326,707
 $2,097,660
  December 31,
  2016 2015
Assets  
  
Rental property:    
Land $272,153
 $240,267
Buildings, improvements and fixtures 2,647,477
 2,249,417
Construction in progress 46,277
 23,533
  2,965,907
 2,513,217
Accumulated depreciation (814,583) (748,341)
Total rental property, net 2,151,324
 1,764,876
Cash and cash equivalents 12,222
 21,558
Restricted cash 
 121,306
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures 128,104
 201,083
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net 151,579
 127,089
Prepaids and other assets 82,985
 78,913
Total assets $2,526,214
 $2,314,825
Liabilities and Equity    
Liabilities    
Debt:    
Senior, unsecured notes, net $1,135,309
 $789,285
Unsecured term loans, net 322,410
 265,832
Mortgages payable, net 172,145
 310,587
Unsecured lines of credit, net 58,002
 186,220
Total debt 1,687,866
 1,551,924
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 78,143
 97,396
Deferred financing obligation 
 28,388
Other liabilities 54,764
 31,085
Total liabilities 1,820,773
 1,708,793
Commitments and contingencies (Note 23) 
 
Equity    
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.:    
Common shares, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 96,095,891 and 95,880,825 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 961
 959
Paid in capital 820,251
 806,379
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income (122,701) (195,486)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (28,295) (36,715)
Equity attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 670,216
 575,137
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests:    
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 35,066
 30,309
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 159
 586
Total equity 705,441
 606,032
Total liabilities and equity $2,526,214
 $2,314,825

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4F-6




TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 For the years ended December 31, For the years ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Revenues  
  
  
Revenues:  
  
  
Base rentals $289,688
 $274,480
 $253,402
 $308,353
 $289,688
 $274,480
Percentage rentals 10,157
 10,307
 11,251
 11,221
 10,157
 10,307
Expense reimbursements 126,468
 122,532
 109,654
 133,818
 126,468
 122,532
Management, leasing and other services 5,426
 3,591
 3,080
 3,847
 5,426
 3,591
Other income 7,630
 7,648
 7,432
 8,595
 7,630
 7,648
Total revenues 439,369
 418,558
 384,819
 465,834
 439,369
 418,558
            
Expenses  
  
  
Expenses:  
  
  
Property operating 146,503
 137,422
 121,046
 152,017
 146,503
 137,422
General and administrative 44,469
 44,469
 39,119
 46,696
 44,469
 44,469
Acquisition costs 
 7
 1,203
 487
 
 7
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 2,365
 
 
 
 2,365
Depreciation and amortization 103,936
 102,432
 95,746
 115,357
 103,936
 102,432
Total expenses 294,908
 286,695
 257,114
 314,557
 294,908
 286,695
Operating income 144,461
 131,863
 127,705
 151,277
 144,461
 131,863
Other income (expense)      
Other income (expense):      
Interest expense (54,188) (57,931) (51,616) (60,669) (54,188) (57,931)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt 
 (13,140) 
 
 
 (13,140)
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities 120,447
 7,513
 
 6,305
 120,447
 7,513
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture 
 
 26,002
Other nonoperating income (expense) (36) 794
 190
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint ventures 95,516
 
 
Other non-operating income (expense) 1,028
 (36) 794
Income before equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures 210,684
 69,099
 102,281
 193,457
 210,684
 69,099
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures 11,484
 9,053
 11,040
 10,872
 11,484
 9,053
Net income 222,168
 78,152
 113,321
 204,329
 222,168
 78,152
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership (11,331) (4,037) (5,643) (10,287) (11,331) (4,037)
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 363
 (104) (121) (298) 363
 (104)
Net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. $211,200
 $74,011
 $107,557
 $193,744
 $211,200
 $74,011
            
Basic earnings per common share      
Basic earnings per common share:      
Net income $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $2.02
 $2.20
 $0.77
            
Diluted earnings per common share      
Diluted earnings per common share:      
Net income $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $2.01
 $2.20
 $0.77

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5F-7





TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)

 For the years ended December 31, For the years ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Net income $222,168
 $78,152
 $113,321
 $204,329
 $222,168
 $78,152
Other comprehensive loss      
Reclassification adjustments for amounts recognized in net income 
 (741) (242)
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Foreign currency translation adjustments (23,200) (10,042) (4,968) 4,259
 (23,200) (10,042)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges (711) (1,287) 1,382
 4,609
 (711) (2,028)
Other comprehensive loss (23,911) (12,070) (3,828)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 8,868
 (23,911) (12,070)
Comprehensive income 198,257
 66,082
 109,493
 213,197
 198,257
 66,082
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (9,749) (3,666) (5,564) (11,033) (9,749) (3,666)
Comprehensive income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. $188,508
 $62,416
 $103,929
 $202,164
 $188,508
 $62,416

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-6F-8




TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
 Common sharesPaid in capitalDistributions in excess of earningsAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total shareholders' equityNoncontrolling interest in Operating PartnershipNoncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
Total
 equity
 Common sharesPaid in capitalAccumulated distributions in excess of earningsAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total shareholders' equityNoncontrolling interest in Operating PartnershipNoncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
Total
 equity
Balance, December 31, 2012 $941
$766,056
$(285,588)$1,200
$482,609
$24,432
$6,834
$513,875
Balance, December 31, 2013 $945
$788,984
$(265,242)$(2,428)$522,259
$28,432
$6,904
$557,595
Net income 

107,557

107,557
5,643
121
113,321
 

74,011

74,011
4,037
104
78,152
Other comprehensive loss 


(3,628)(3,628)(200)
(3,828) 


(11,595)(11,595)(475)
(12,070)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
11,743


11,743


11,743
 
15,459


15,459


15,459
Issuance of 44,500 common shares upon exercise of options 
635


635


635
Issuance of 450,576 Operating Partnership limited partner units 




13,981

13,981
Issuance of 332,373 restricted shares, net of forfeitures 3
(3)





Issuance of 47,000 common shares upon exercise of options 
903


903


903
Grant of 1,302,729 restricted common shares, net of forfeitures 13
(13)





Withholding of 412,239 common shares for employee income taxes (4)(15,516)

(15,520)

(15,520)
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 
11,130


11,130
(11,130)

 
741


741
(741)

Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
(576)

(576)
576

 
1,009


1,009

(5)1,004
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 





(525)(525) 





(6,226)(6,226)
Exchange of 67,428 Operating Partnership units for 67,428 common shares 1
(1)





Common dividends ($0.8850 per share) 

(87,211)
(87,211)

(87,211)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 




(4,294)(102)(4,396)
Balance, December 31, 2013 $945
$788,984
$(265,242)$(2,428)$522,259
$28,432
$6,904
$557,595
Exchange of 66,606 Operating Partnership units for 66,606 common shares 1
(1)





Common dividends ($.945 per share) 

(90,448)
(90,448)

(90,448)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 




(4,836)(127)(4,963)
Balance, December 31, 2014 $955
$791,566
$(281,679)$(14,023)$496,819
$26,417
$650
$523,886

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-7F-9




TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
  Common sharesPaid in capitalDistributions in excess of earningsAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total shareholders' equityNoncontrolling interest in Operating PartnershipNoncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
Total
 equity
Balance, December 31, 2013 $945
$788,984
$(265,242)$(2,428)$522,259
$28,432
$6,904
$557,595
Net income 

74,011

74,011
4,037
104
78,152
Other comprehensive loss 


(11,595)(11,595)(475)
(12,070)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
15,459


15,459


15,459
Issuance of 47,000 common shares upon exercise of options 
903


903


903
Issuance of 1,302,729 restricted common shares, net of forfeitures 13
(13)





Withholding of 412,239 common shares for employee income taxes (4)(15,516)

(15,520)

(15,520)
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 
741


741
(741)

Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
1,009


1,009

(5)1,004
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 





(6,226)(6,226)
Exchange of 66,606 Operating Partnership units for 66,606 common shares 1
(1)





Common dividends ($.9450 per share) 

(90,448)
(90,448)

(90,448)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 




(4,836)(127)(4,963)
Balance, December 31, 2014 $955
$791,566
$(281,679)$(14,023)$496,819
$26,417
$650
$523,886

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
  Common sharesPaid in capitalAccumulated distributions in excess of earningsAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total shareholders' equityNoncontrolling interest in Operating PartnershipNoncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
Total
 equity
Balance,
December 31, 2014
 $955
$791,566
$(281,679)$(14,023)$496,819
$26,417
$650
$523,886
Net income 

211,200

211,200
11,331
(363)222,168
Other comprehensive loss 


(22,692)(22,692)(1,219)
(23,911)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
15,550


15,550


15,550
Issuance of 28,400 common shares upon exercise of options 
788


788


788
Grant of 348,844 restricted common shares, net of forfeitures 4
(4)





Withholding of 31,863 common shares for employee income taxes 
(1,125)

(1,125)

(1,125)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 





461
461
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 
(402)

(402)402


Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
6


6

(6)
Exchange of 25,663 Operating Partnership units for 25,663 common shares 







Common dividends ($1.305 per share) 

(125,007)
(125,007)

(125,007)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 




(6,622)(156)(6,778)
Balance,
December 31, 2015
 $959
$806,379
$(195,486)$(36,715)$575,137
$30,309
$586
$606,032

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-8F-10




TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
  Common sharesPaid in capitalDistributions in excess of earningsAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total shareholders' equityNoncontrolling interest in Operating PartnershipNoncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnershipsTotal
equity
Balance, December 31, 2014 $955
$791,566
$(281,679)$(14,023)$496,819
$26,417
$650
$523,886
Net income 

211,200

211,200
11,331
(363)222,168
Other comprehensive loss 


(22,692)(22,692)(1,219)
(23,911)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
15,550


15,550


15,550
Issuance of 28,400 common shares upon exercise of options 
788


788


788
Issuance of 348,844 restricted common shares, net of forfeitures 4
(4)





Withholding of 31,863 common shares for employee income taxes 
(1,125)

(1,125)

(1,125)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 





461
461
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 
(402)

(402)402


Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
6


6

(6)
Exchange of 25,663 Operating Partnership units for 25,663 common shares 







Common dividends ($1.305 per share) 

(125,007)
(125,007)

(125,007)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 




(6,622)(156)(6,778)
Balance,
December 31, 2015
 $959
$806,379
$(195,486)$(36,715)$575,137
$30,309
$586
$606,032

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
  Common sharesPaid in capitalAccumulated distributions in excess of earningsAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total shareholders' equityNoncontrolling interest in Operating PartnershipNoncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnershipsTotal
equity
Balance, December 31, 2015 $959
$806,379
$(195,486)$(36,715)$575,137
$30,309
$586
$606,032
Net income 

193,744

193,744
10,287
298
204,329
Other comprehensive income 


8,420
8,420
448

8,868
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
16,304


16,304


16,304
Issuance of 59,700 common shares upon exercise of options 
1,749


1,749


1,749
Grant of 173,124 restricted common share awards, net of forfeitures 2
(2)





Issuance of 24,040 deferred shares 







Withholding of
66,760 common shares for employee income taxes
 
(2,177)

(2,177)

(2,177)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 





35
35
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 
(389)

(389)389


Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
4


4

(4)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership 
(1,617)

(1,617)
(325)(1,942)
Exchange of 24,962 Operating Partnership units for 24,962 common shares 







Common dividends ($1.260 per share) 

(120,959)
(120,959)

(120,959)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership 




(6,367)(431)(6,798)
Balance,
December 31, 2016
 $961
$820,251
$(122,701)$(28,295)$670,216
$35,066
$159
$705,441

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-9F-11




TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
  For the years ended December 31,
  2015 2014 2013
Operating Activities  
  
  
Net income $222,168
 $78,152
 $113,321
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:    
  
Depreciation and amortization 103,936
 102,432
 95,746
Amortization of deferred financing costs 2,730
 2,382
 2,194
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 2,365
 
Casualty gain 
 (486) 
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (120,447) (7,513) 
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture 
 
 (26,002)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (11,484) (9,053) (11,040)
Share-based compensation expense 14,712
 14,750
 11,376
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net 256
 (601) (886)
Net amortization of market rent rate adjustments 2,461
 3,209
 1,141
Straight-line rent adjustments (6,347) (6,073) (5,529)
Payment of discount on extinguishment of debt 
 (913) 
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 12,137
 9,586
 5,853
Changes in other asset and liabilities:      
Other assets (798) 4,160
 (7,676)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,431
 (3,626) 8,988
Net cash provided by operating activities 220,755
 188,771
 187,486
Investing Activities  
  
  
Additions to rental property (238,706) (145,896) (47,436)
Acquisition of interest in unconsolidated joint venture, net of cash acquired 
 
 (11,271)
Additions to investments in and notes receivable from unconsolidated joint ventures (45,286) (142,268) (150,854)
Net proceeds on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities 164,587
 38,993
 
Change in restricted cash (121,306) 
 
Proceeds from insurance reimbursements 649
 1,964
 
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 26,875
 65,336
 47,149
Additions to non-real estate assets (837) (1,053) (7,768)
Additions to deferred lease costs (7,803) (5,664) (4,046)
Net cash used in investing activities 
 (221,827) (188,588) (174,226)
Financing Activities      
Cash dividends paid (104,877) (90,448) (87,211)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership (5,561) (4,836) (4,294)
Proceeds from debt issuances 627,839
 931,608
 785,803
Repayments of debt (507,483) (815,690) (697,377)
Employee income taxes paid related to shares withheld upon vesting of equity awards (1,126) (15,520) 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
 
 (525)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships (156) (127) (102)
Additions to deferred financing costs (2,829) (3,913) (4,001)
Proceeds from exercise of options 788
 903
 635
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 259
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 6,854
 1,977
 (7,072)
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1,099) (526) (1,282)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 4,683
 1,634
 4,906
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 16,875
 15,241
 10,335
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $21,558
 $16,875
 $15,241
  For the years ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Operating Activities  
  
  
Net income $204,329
 $222,168
 $78,152
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:    
  
Depreciation and amortization 115,357
 103,936
 102,432
Amortization of deferred financing costs 3,237
 2,730
 2,382
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 
 2,365
Casualty gain 
 
 (486)
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (6,305) (120,447) (7,513)
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint ventures (95,516) 
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (10,872) (11,484) (9,053)
Share-based compensation expense 15,319
 14,712
 14,750
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net 1,290
 256
 (601)
Net amortization of market rent rate adjustments 3,302
 2,461
 3,209
Straight-line rent adjustments (7,002) (6,347) (6,073)
Payment of discount on extinguishment of debt 
 
 (913)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 13,662
 12,137
 9,586
Changes in other asset and liabilities:      
Other assets (544) (798) 4,160
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 3,059
 1,431
 (3,626)
Net cash provided by operating activities 239,316
 220,755
 188,771
Investing Activities  
  
  
Additions to rental property (165,060) (238,706) (145,896)
Acquisitions of interest in unconsolidated joint ventures, net of cash acquired (45,219) 
 
Additions to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures (32,968) (45,286) (142,268)
Net proceeds on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities 28,706
 164,587
 38,993
Change in restricted cash 121,306
 (121,306) 
Proceeds from insurance reimbursements 983
 649
 1,964
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 60,267
 26,875
 65,336
Additions to non-real estate assets (6,503) (837) (1,053)
Additions to deferred lease costs (7,013) (7,803) (5,664)
Net cash used in investing activities 
 (45,501) (221,827) (188,588)
Financing Activities      
Cash dividends paid (141,088) (104,877) (90,448)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership (7,428) (5,561) (4,836)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility 845,650
 537,000
 657,800
Repayments of revolving credit facility (974,950) (457,700) (563,000)
Proceeds from notes, mortgages and loans 437,420
 90,839
 273,808
Repayments of notes, mortgages and loans (330,329) (49,783) (252,690)
Repayment of deferred financing obligation (28,388) 
 
Employee income taxes paid related to shares withheld upon vesting of equity awards (2,177) (1,126) (15,520)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership (1,942) 
 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships (385) (156) (127)
Additions to deferred financing costs (5,496) (2,829) (3,913)
Proceeds from exercise of options 1,749
 788
 903
Other financing activities 3,897
 259
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (203,467) 6,854
 1,977
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 316
 (1,099) (526)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (9,336) 4,683
 1,634
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 21,558
 16,875
 15,241
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $12,222
 $21,558
 $16,875

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-10F-12






TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for unit data)

 December 31, December 31,
 2015 2014 2016 2015
Assets  
  
  
  
Rental property    
Rental property:    
Land $240,267
 $217,994
 $272,153
 $240,267
Buildings, improvements and fixtures 2,249,417
 1,947,083
 2,647,477
 2,249,417
Construction in progress 23,533
 98,526
 46,277
 23,533
 2,513,217
 2,263,603
 2,965,907
 2,513,217
Accumulated depreciation (748,341) (662,236) (814,583) (748,341)
Total rental property, net 1,764,876
 1,601,367
 2,151,324
 1,764,876
Cash and cash equivalents 21,552
 15,806
 12,199
 21,552
Restricted cash 121,306
 
 
 121,306
Rental property held for sale 
 46,005
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures 201,083
 208,050
 128,104
 201,083
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net 127,089
 140,883
 151,579
 127,089
Deferred debt origination costs, net 11,882
 12,126
Prepaids and other assets 78,248
 71,848
 82,481
 78,248
Total assets $2,326,036
 $2,096,085
 $2,525,687
 $2,314,154
Liabilities and Equity        
Liabilities        
Debt    
Senior, unsecured notes (net of discount of $5,747 and $6,426, respectively) $794,253
 $793,574
Unsecured term loans (net of discount of $81 and $241, respectively) 267,419
 267,259
Mortgages payable (including premiums of $2,448 and $3,031, respectively) 311,834
 271,361
Debt:    
Senior, unsecured notes, net $1,135,309
 $789,285
Unsecured term loans, net 322,410
 265,832
Mortgages payable, net 172,145
 310,587
Unsecured lines of credit 190,300
 111,000
 58,002
 186,220
Total debt 1,563,806
 1,443,194
 1,687,866
 1,551,924
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 96,725
 67,983
 77,616
 96,725
Deferred financing obligation 28,388
 28,388
 
 28,388
Other liabilities 31,085
 32,634
 54,764
 31,085
Total liabilities 1,720,004
 1,572,199
 1,820,246
 1,708,122
Commitments and contingencies 
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 23) 
 
Equity        
Partners' Equity    
General partner, 1,000,000 units outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014 5,726
 4,828
Limited partners, 5,052,743 and 5,078,406 Class A units and 94,880,825 and 94,509,781 Class B units outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively 638,422
 533,199
Partners' Equity:    
General partner, 1,000,000 units outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015 6,485
 5,726
Limited partners, 5,027,781 and 5,052,743 Class A units and 95,095,891 and 94,880,825 Class B units outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 728,631
 638,422
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (38,702) (14,791) (29,834) (38,702)
Total partners' equity 605,446
 523,236
 705,282
 605,446
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 586
 650
 159
 586
Total equity 606,032
 523,886
 705,441
 606,032
Total liabilities and equity $2,326,036
 $2,096,085
 $2,525,687
 $2,314,154

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-11F-13




TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per unit data)
 For the years ended December 31, For the years ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Revenues  
  
  
Revenues:  
  
  
Base rentals $289,688
 $274,480
 $253,402
 $308,353
 $289,688
 $274,480
Percentage rentals 10,157
 10,307
 11,251
 11,221
 10,157
 10,307
Expense reimbursements 126,468
 122,532
 109,654
 133,818
 126,468
 122,532
Management, leasing and other services 5,426
 3,591
 3,080
 3,847
 5,426
 3,591
Other income 7,630
 7,648
 7,432
 8,595
 7,630
 7,648
Total revenues 439,369
 418,558
 384,819
 465,834
 439,369
 418,558
            
Expenses  
  
  
Expenses:  
  
  
Property operating 146,503
 137,422
 121,046
 152,017
 146,503
 137,422
General and administrative 44,469
 44,469
 39,119
 46,696
 44,469
 44,469
Acquisition costs 
 7
 1,203
 487
 
 7
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 2,365
 
 
 
 2,365
Depreciation and amortization 103,936
 102,432
 95,746
 115,357
 103,936
 102,432
Total expenses 294,908
 286,695
 257,114
 314,557
 294,908
 286,695
Operating income 144,461
 131,863
 127,705
 151,277
 144,461
 131,863
Other income (expense)      
Other income (expense):      
Interest expense (54,188) (57,931) (51,616) (60,669) (54,188) (57,931)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 
 (13,140) 
 
 
 (13,140)
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities 120,447
 7,513
 
 6,305
 120,447
 7,513
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture 
 
 26,002
Other nonoperating income (expense) (36) 794
 190
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint ventures 95,516
 
 
Other non-operating income (expense) 1,028
 (36) 794
Income before equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures 210,684
 69,099
 102,281
 193,457
 210,684
 69,099
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures 11,484
 9,053
 11,040
 10,872
 11,484
 9,053
Net income 222,168
 78,152
 113,321
 204,329
 222,168
 78,152
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 363
 (104) (121) (298) 363
 (104)
Net income available to partners 222,531
 78,048
 113,200
 204,031
 222,531
 78,048
Net income available to limited partners 220,328
 77,263
 112,047
 202,012
 220,328
 77,263
Net income available to general partner $2,203
 $785
 $1,153
 $2,019
 $2,203
 $785
            
Basic earnings per common unit      
Basic earnings per common unit:      
Net income $2.21
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $2.02
 $2.21
 $0.77
            
Diluted earnings per common unit      
Diluted earnings per common unit:      
Net income $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $2.01
 $2.20
 $0.77

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-12F-14




TANGER PROPERITES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)

 For the years ended December 31, For the years ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Net income $222,168
 $78,152
 $113,321
 $204,329
 $222,168
 $78,152
Other comprehensive loss      
Reclassification adjustments for amounts recognized in net income 
 (741) (242)
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Foreign currency translation adjustments (23,200) (10,042) (4,968) 4,259
 (23,200) (10,042)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges (711) (1,287) 1,382
 4,609
 (711) (2,028)
Other comprehensive loss (23,911) (12,070) (3,828)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 8,868
 (23,911) (12,070)
Comprehensive income 198,257
 66,082
 109,493
 213,197
 198,257
 66,082
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 363
 (104) (121) (298) 363
 (104)
Comprehensive income attributable to the Operating Partnership $198,620
 $65,978
 $109,372
 $212,899
 $198,620
 $65,978

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




F-13F-15




TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(in thousands, except unit and per unit data)
 General partnerLimited partnersAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total partners' equityNoncontrolling interests in consolidated partnershipsTotal equity General partnerLimited partnersAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Total partners' equityNoncontrolling interests in consolidated partnershipsTotal equity
Balance, December 31, 2012 $4,720
$501,214
$1,107
$507,041
$6,834
$513,875
Net income 1,153
112,047

113,200
121
113,321
Other comprehensive loss 

(3,828)(3,828)
(3,828)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
11,743

11,743

11,743
Issuance of 44,500 common units upon exercise of options 
635

635

635
Issuance of 450,576 limited partner units 
13,981

13,981

13,981
Issuance of 332,373 restricted units, net of forfeitures 





Adjustments for noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 
(576)
(576)576

Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 



(525)(525)
Common distributions ($0.8850 per common unit) (885)(90,620)
(91,505)
(91,505)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 



(102)(102)
Balance, December 31, 2013 $4,988
$548,424
$(2,721)$550,691
$6,904
$557,595
 $4,988
$548,424
$(2,721)$550,691
$6,904
$557,595
Net income 785
77,263

78,048
104
78,152
 785
77,263

78,048
104
78,152
Other comprehensive loss 

(12,070)(12,070)
(12,070) 

(12,070)(12,070)
(12,070)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
15,459

15,459

15,459
 
15,459

15,459

15,459
Issuance of 47,000 common units upon exercise of options 
903

903

903
 
903

903

903
Issuance of 1,302,729 restricted common units, net of forfeitures 





 





Withholding of 412,239 common units for employee income taxes 
(15,520)
(15,520)
(15,520) 
(15,520)
(15,520)
(15,520)
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
1,009

1,009
(5)1,004
 
1,009

1,009
(5)1,004
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 



(6,226)(6,226) 



(6,226)(6,226)
Common distributions ($.9450 per common unit) (945)(94,339)
(95,284)
(95,284)
Common distributions ($.945 per common unit) (945)(94,339)
(95,284)
(95,284)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 



(127)(127) 



(127)(127)
Balance, December 31, 2014 $4,828
$533,199
$(14,791)$523,236
$650
$523,886
 $4,828
$533,199
$(14,791)$523,236
$650
$523,886
Net income 2,203
220,328

222,531
(363)222,168
 2,203
220,328

222,531
(363)222,168
Other comprehensive loss 

(23,911)(23,911)
(23,911) 

(23,911)(23,911)
(23,911)
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
15,550

15,550

15,550
 
15,550

15,550

15,550
Issuance of 28,400 common units upon exercise of options 
788

788

788
 
788

788

788
Issuance of 348,844 restricted common units, net of forfeitures 





 





Withholding of 31,863 common units for employee income taxes 
(1,125)
(1,125)
(1,125) 
(1,125)
(1,125)
(1,125)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 



461
461
 



461
461
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
6

6
(6)
 
6

6
(6)
Common distributions ($1.305 per common unit)
 (1,305)(130,324)
(131,629)
(131,629) (1,305)(130,324)
(131,629)
(131,629)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 



(156)(156) 



(156)(156)
Balance, December 31, 2015 $5,726
$638,422
$(38,702)$605,446
$586
$606,032
 $5,726
$638,422
$(38,702)$605,446
$586
$606,032
Net income 2,019
202,012

204,031
298
204,329
Other comprehensive income 

8,868
8,868

8,868
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan 
16,304

16,304

16,304
Issuance of 59,700 common units upon exercise of options 
1,749

1,749

1,749
Grant of 173,124 restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures 





Issuance of 24,040 deferred units 





Withholding of 66,760 common units for employee income taxes 
(2,177)
(2,177)
(2,177)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 



35
35
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
4

4
(4)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership 
(1,617)
(1,617)(325)(1,942)
Common distributions ($1.260 per common unit)
 (1,260)(126,066)
(127,326)
(127,326)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 



(431)(431)
Balance, December 31, 2016 $6,485
$728,631
$(29,834)$705,282
$159
$705,441

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-14F-16




TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
 For the years ended December 31, For the years ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Operating activities  
  
  
  
  
  
Net income $222,168
 $78,152
 $113,321
 $204,329
 $222,168
 $78,152
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization 103,936
 102,432
 95,746
 115,357
 103,936
 102,432
Amortization of deferred financing costs 2,730
 2,382
 2,194
 3,237
 2,730
 2,382
Abandoned pre-development costs 
 2,365
 
 
 
 2,365
Casualty gain 
 (486) 
 
 
 (486)
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (120,447) (7,513) 
 (6,305) (120,447) (7,513)
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture 
 
 (26,002)
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint ventures (95,516) 
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (11,484) (9,053) (11,040) (10,872) (11,484) (9,053)
Equity-based compensation expense 14,712
 14,750
 11,376
 15,319
 14,712
 14,750
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net 256
 (601) (886) 1,290
 256
 (601)
Net amortization of market rent rate adjustments 2,461
 3,209
 1,141
 3,302
 2,461
 3,209
Straight-line rent adjustments (6,347) (6,073) (5,529) (7,002) (6,347) (6,073)
Payment of discount on extinguishment of debt 
 (913) 
 
 
 (913)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 12,137
 9,586
 5,853
 13,662
 12,137
 9,586
Increases (decreases) due to changes in:  
  
  
Changes in other assets and liabilities:  
  
  
Other assets (639) 4,417
 (7,861) (705) (639) 4,417
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,335
 (4,695) 8,956
 3,203
 2,335
 (4,695)
Net cash provided by operating activities 221,818
 187,959
 187,269
 239,299
 221,818
 187,959
Investing activities  
  
  
  
  
  
Additions to rental property (238,706) (145,896) (47,436) (165,060) (238,706) (145,896)
Acquisition of interest in unconsolidated joint venture, net of cash acquired 
 
 (11,271)
Additions to investments in and notes receivable from unconsolidated joint ventures (45,286) (142,268) (150,854)
Acquisitions of interest in unconsolidated joint ventures, net of cash acquired (45,219) 
 
Additions to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures (32,968) (45,286) (142,268)
Net proceeds on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities 164,587
 38,993
 
 28,706
 164,587
 38,993
Change in restricted cash (121,306) 
 
 121,306
 (121,306) 
Proceeds from insurance reimbursements 649
 1,964
 
 983
 649
 1,964
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 26,875
 65,336
 47,149
 60,267
 26,875
 65,336
Additions to non-real estate assets (837) (1,053) (7,768) (6,503) (837) (1,053)
Additions to deferred lease costs (7,803) (5,664) (4,046) (7,013) (7,803) (5,664)
Net cash used in investing activities
 (221,827) (188,588) (174,226) (45,501) (221,827) (188,588)
Financing activities            
Cash distributions paid (110,438) (95,284) (91,505) (148,516) (110,438) (95,284)
Proceeds from debt issuance 627,839
 931,608
 810,803
Repayments of debt (507,483) (815,690) (722,377)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility 845,650
 537,000
 657,800
Repayments of revolving credit facility (974,950) (457,700) (563,000)
Proceeds from notes, mortgages and loans 437,420
 90,839
 273,808
Repayments of notes, mortgages and loans (330,329) (49,783) (252,690)
Repayment of deferred financing obligation (28,388) 
 
Employee income taxes paid related to shares withheld upon vesting of equity awards (1,126) (15,520) 
 (2,177) (1,126) (15,520)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships 
 
 (525)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership (1,942) 
 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships (156) (127) (102) (385) (156) (127)
Additions to deferred financing costs (2,829) (3,913) (4,001) (5,496) (2,829) (3,913)
Proceeds from exercise of options 788
 903
 635
 1,749
 788
 903
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 259
 
 
Other financing activities 3,897
 259
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 6,854
 1,977
 (7,072) (203,467) 6,854
 1,977
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1,099) (526) (1,282) 316
 (1,099) (526)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 5,746
 822
 4,689
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (9,353) 5,746

822
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 15,806
 14,984
 10,295
 21,552
 15,806
 14,984
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $21,552
 $15,806
 $14,984
 $12,199
 $21,552
 $15,806

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-15F-17




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

1.Organization of the Company

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries, which we refer to as the Company, is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States and Canada. We are a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") which, through our controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we owned and operated 3436 consolidated outlet centers, with a total gross leasable area of approximately 11.712.7 million square feet. All references to gross leasable area, square feet, occupancy, stores and store brands contained in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are unaudited. These outlet centers were 97%98% occupied and contained over 2,4002,600 stores, representing approximately 400 store brands. We also had partial ownership interests in 98 unconsolidated outlet centers totaling approximately 2.72.3 million square feet, including 4 outlet centers in Canada.

Our outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted by, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries.subsidiaries, which we refer to as the Operating Partnership. Accordingly, the descriptions of our business, employees and properties are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term “Operating Partnership” refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.

The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company, through its ownership of Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust, owned 95,880,82596,095,891 units of the Operating Partnership and other limited partners (the "Non-Company LPs") collectively owned 5,052,7435,027,781 Class A common limited partnership units. Each Class A common limited partnership unit held by the Non-Company LPs is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's status as a REIT. Class B common limited partnership units, which are held by Tanger LP Trust, are not exchangeable for common shares of the Company.

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements of the Company include its accounts and its consolidated subsidiaries, as well as the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include its accounts and its consolidated subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company currently consolidates the Operating Partnership because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Operating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership that could be potentially significant.

We consolidate properties that are wholly owned or properties where we own less than 100% but we control. Control is determined using an evaluation based on accounting standards related to the consolidation of voting interest entities and variable interest entities ("VIE"). For joint ventures that are determined to be a VIE, we consolidate the entity where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary considers all relationships between usvarious factors including the form of our ownership interest, our representation in an entity's governance, the size of our investment, our ability to participate in policy making decisions and the VIE, including management agreementsrights of the other investors to participate in the decision making process to replace us as manager and other contractual arrangements.or liquidate the venture, if applicable.

F-18





Investments in real estate joint ventures that we do not control but may exercise significant influence on are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our equity in the venture's net income or loss, cash contributions, distributions and other adjustments required under the equity method of accounting.

For certain of these investments, we record our equity in the venture's net income or loss under the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method of accounting due to the structures and the preferences we receive on the distributions from our joint ventures pursuant to the respective joint venture agreements for those joint ventures.

F-16



Under this method, we recognize income and loss in each period based on the change in liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value. Therefore, income or loss may be allocated disproportionately as compared to the ownership percentages due to specified preferred return rate thresholds and may be more or less than actual cash distributions received and more or less than what we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation. In the event a basis difference is created between our underlying interest in the venture's net assets and our initial investment, we amortize such amount over the estimated life of the venture as a component of equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures.

We separately report investments in joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in and our share of net income or loss of the joint ventures within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.sheets because we are committed to provide further financial support to these joint ventures. The carrying amount of our investments in the Charlotte and Galveston/Houston joint ventures are less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that were greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.

We have concluded that our Savannah and Southaven joint ventures are each considered a VIE because our voting rights are disproportionate to our economic interests and substantially all of each venture's activities either involve or are conducted on our behalf. Also, due to certain reconsideration events, we concluded during 2015 that our Westgate joint venture, previously considered a VIE since inception, was no longer considered a VIE.

The operating, development, leasing, and management agreements of Savannah provide that the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the venture require unanimous consent. Accordingly, we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary since we do not have the power to direct the significant activities that affect the economic performance of the venture, and have applied the equity method of accounting. The carrying amount of our investment in Savannah is reflected in investments in unconsolidated joint ventures on our consolidated balance sheets and was $44.4 million as of December 31, 2015. We are unable to estimate our maximum exposure to loss at this time because our guarantees are limited and based on the future operating performance of Savannah.

The management agreement and other contractual arrangements for Southaven give us, but not necessarily our joint venture partner, significant participating rights over activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the ventures, thus we have concluded that we are the primary beneficiary and have consolidated the venture's balance sheet and results of operations. At December 31, 2015, total assets of this venture were $81.5 million and total liabilities were $55.6 million. The primary classification of the assets on the consolidated balance sheets are rental property, net of accumulated depreciation totaling $76.7 million; cash of $1.4 million and other assets of $3.4 million (including deferred lease costs and other intangibles and deferred debt origination costs) and the primary classification of the liabilities include accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9.8 million and mortgages payable of $45.8 million. These assets include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of the VIE. The liabilities include third party liabilities and exclude intercompany balances that are eliminated in consolidation.

Noncontrolling interests - In the Company's consolidated financial statements, the “Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership” reflects the Non-Company LPsLP's percentage ownership of the Operating Partnership's units. The "Noncontrolling Interestsinterests in Other Consolidated Partnerships"other consolidated partnerships" consist of outside equity interests in partnerships or joint ventures not wholly-ownedwholly owned by the Company or the Operating Partnership butthat are consolidated with the financial results of the Company and Operating Partnership because the Operating Partnership exercises control over the entities that own the properties. Noncontrolling interests are initially recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value based upon purchase price allocations. Income is allocated to the noncontrolling interests based on the allocation provisions within the partnership or joint venture agreements.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used in the calculations of impairment losses, costs capitalized to originate operating leases, costs incurred for the construction and development of properties, and the values of deferred lease costs and other intangibles related to the acquisition of properties. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


F-17



Operating Segments - We focus exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating, and managing outlet shopping centers. We aggregate the financial information of all outlet centers into one reportable operating segment because the outlet centers all have similar economic characteristics and provide similar products and services to similar types and classes of customers.

Rental Property - Rental properties are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings, improvements and fixtures consist primarily of permanent buildings and improvements made to land such as infrastructure and costs incurred in providing rental space to tenants.

The pre-construction stage of project development involves certain costs to secure land control and zoning and complete other initial tasks essential to the development of the project. These costs are transferred from other assets to construction in progress when the pre-construction tasks are completed. Costs of unsuccessful pre-construction efforts are charged to operationsexpensed when the project is no longer probable.probable and, if significant, are recorded as abandoned pre-development costs in the consolidated statement of operations.


F-19




We also capitalize other costs incurred for the construction and development of properties, including interest, real estate taxes and payroll and related costs associated with employees directly involved. Capitalization of costs commences at the time the development of the property becomes probable and ceases when the property is substantially completed and ready for its intended use. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and ready for its intended use upon the completion of tenant improvements. We cease capitalization on the portion that is substantially completed and occupied or held available for occupancy, and capitalize only those costs associated with the portion under construction. The amount of payroll and related costs capitalized for the construction and development of properties which during 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $3.0 million, $1.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, is based on our estimate of the amount of costs directly related to the construction or development of these assets.

Interest costs are capitalized during periods of active construction for qualified expenditures based upon interest rates in place during the construction period until construction is substantially complete. This includes interest incurred on funds invested in or advanced to unconsolidated joint ventures for qualifying development activities until placed in service. Interest

Payroll and related costs and interest costs capitalized duringfor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 amounted to approximately $3.4 million, $5.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively.were as follows (in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Payroll and related costs capitalized $2,095
 $2,989
 $1,543
Interest costs capitalized $2,259
 $3,448
 $5,095

Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We generally use estimated lives of 33 years for buildings and improvements, 15 years for land improvements and 7 years for equipment. Tenant finishing allowances are amortized over the life of the associated lease. Capitalized interest costs are amortized over lives which are consistent with the constructed assets. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred while significant renovations and improvements which improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life.

Depreciation expense related to rental property included in net income for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $85.9 million, $80.1 million and $74.7 million, respectively.as follows (in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Depreciation expense related to rental property $96,813
 $85,872
 $80,057


F-18



In accordance with accounting guidance for business combinations, we allocate the purchase price of acquisitions based on the fair value of land, building, tenant improvements, debt and deferred lease costs and other intangibles, such as the value of leases with above or below market rents, origination costs associated with the in-place leases, the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships, if any. We depreciate the amount allocated to building, deferred lease costs and other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which range up to 33 years. The values of the above and below market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. The values of below market leases that are considered to have renewal periods with below market rents are amortized over the remaining term of the associated lease plus the renewal periods when the renewal is deemed probable to occur. The value associated with in-place leases is amortized over the remaining lease term and tenant relationships is amortized over the expected term, which includes an estimated probability of the lease renewal. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangibles is written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date). We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. These cash flow projections may be derived from various observable and unobservable inputs and assumptions. Also, we may utilize third-party valuation specialists. As a part of acquisition accounting, the amount by which the fair value of our previously held equity method investment exceeds the carrying book value is recorded as a gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture. Direct costs to acquire existing outlet centers are expensed as incurred.


F-20




Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash - All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash balances at a limited number of banks may periodically exceed insurable amounts. We believe that we mitigate our risk by investing in or through major financial institutions. Recoverability of investments is dependent upon the performance of the issuer. At December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, we had cash equivalent investments in highly liquid money market accounts at major financial institutions of $671,000.$672,000 and $671,000, respectively.

The restricted cash represents the cash proceeds from property sales that are being held by a qualified intermediary in anticipation of such amounts subsequently being invested in a tax efficient manner under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Deferred Charges - Deferred charges includesinclude deferred lease costs and other intangible assets consisting of fees and costs incurred to originate operating leases and are amortized over the expected lease term. Deferred lease costs capitalized, including amounts paid to third-party brokers and payroll and related costs of employees directly involved in originating leases duringfor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 were approximately $7.8 million, $6.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively. as follows (in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Deferred lease costs capitalized $7,013
 $7,803
 $6,199

Of the amounts capitalized during 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013, approximately $6.2 million, $5.1 million, and $2.9 million, respectively,the following were related to payroll and related costs. costs (in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Deferred lease costs capitalized- payroll and related costs $6,210
 $6,236
 $5,084

The amount of payroll and related costs capitalized is based on our estimate of the time and amount of costs directly related to originating leases. Deferred lease costs and other intangible assets also include the value of leases and origination costs deemed to have been acquired in real estate acquisitions.

Deferred financing costs - Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing and are amortized over the terms of the respective loans. Unamortized deferred financing costs are charged to expense when debt is retired before the maturity date.

Captive Insurance - We have a wholly-owned captive insurance company that is responsible for losses up to certain deductible levels per occurrence for property damage (including wind damage from hurricanes) prior to third-party insurance coverage. Insurance losses are reflected in property operating expenses and include estimates of costs incurred, both reported and unreported.
 

F-19



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - Rental property held and used by us is reviewed for impairment in the event that facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such an event, we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the asset's carrying amount, and if less than such carrying amount, recognize an impairment loss in an amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined using a marketan income approach whereby we consider the prevailing market income capitalization rates and sales data for transactions involving similar assets.stabilized net operating income projections. We recognized no impairment losses for our consolidated properties during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, and 2013, respectively. Also, we believe there were no unrecordedSee Note 6 for discussion of the impairment losses forof our unconsolidated joint venture at the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.Bromont, Quebec outlet center during 2016.

Rental Property Held For Sale - Rental properties designated as held for sale are stated at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value less costs to sell. We classify rental property as held for sale when our Board of Directors approves the sale of the assets and it meets the requirements of current accounting guidance. Subsequent to this classification, no further depreciation is recorded on the assets.


F-21




Impairment of Investments - On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if management's estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investments, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the value of the investment. Our estimates of value for each joint venture investment are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, estimated hold period, terminal capitalization rates, demand for space, competition for tenants, discount and capitalization rates, changes in market rental rates and operating costs of the property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, the values estimated by us in our impairment analysis may not be realized. As

Sales of December 31, 2015Real Estate - For sales transactions meeting the requirements for full profit recognition, the related assets and 2014,liabilities are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is recorded in the period the transaction closes. For sales transactions with continuing involvement after the sale, if the continuing involvement with the property is limited by the terms of the sales contract, profit is recognized at the time of sale and is reduced by the maximum exposure to loss related to the nature of the continuing involvement. Sales to entities in which we have or receive an interest are accounted for using partial sale accounting.

For transactions that do not believemeet the criteria for a sale, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement, including put and call provisions, if present, and account for the transaction as a financing arrangement, profit-sharing arrangement, leasing arrangement or other alternate method of accounting, rather than as a sale, based on the nature and extent of the continuing involvement. Some transactions may have numerous forms of continuing involvement. In those cases, we determine which method is most appropriate based on the substance of the transaction.

Discontinued Operations -Properties that anyare sold or classified as held for sale are classified as discontinued operations provided that the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and financial results (e.g., a disposal of oura major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity investments were impaired.method investment or other major parts of an entity).

Derivatives - We selectively enter into interest rate protection agreements to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates on our variable rate borrowings. The notional amounts of such agreements are used to measure the interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to loss. None of these agreements are used for speculative or trading purposes.

We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measure those instruments at their fair value. We also measure the effectiveness, as defined by the relevant accounting guidance, of all derivatives. We formally document our derivative transactions, including identifying the hedge instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transaction. At inception and on a quarterly basis thereafter, we assess the effectiveness of derivatives used to hedge transactions. If a cash flow hedge is deemed effective, we record the change in fair value in other comprehensive income.income (loss). If after assessment it is determined that a portion of the derivative is ineffective, then that portion of the derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.

Income Taxes - We operate in a manner intended to enable the Company to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. A REIT which distributes at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders each year and which meets certain other conditions is not taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT and to distribute substantially all of the Company's taxable income to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provision has been made in the Company's consolidated financial statements for Federal income taxes. As a partnership, the allocated share of income or loss for the year with respect to the Operating Partnership is included in the income tax returns for the partners; accordingly, no provision has been made for Federal income taxes in the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements. In addition, we continue to evaluate uncertain tax positions. The tax years 20122013 - 20152016 remain open to examination by the major tax jurisdictions to which we are subject.


F-22




With regard to the Company's unconsolidated Canadian joint ventures, deferred tax assets result principally from depreciation deducted under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") that exceed capital cost allowances claimed under Canadian tax rules. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. We have determined that a full valuation allowance is required as we believe none of the deferred tax assets will be realized.


F-20



For income tax purposes, distributions paid to the Company's common shareholders consist of ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination thereof. Dividends per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 were taxable as follows:
Common dividends per share: 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Ordinary income $1.2850
 $0.7645
 $0.7894
 $1.246
 $1.285
 $0.765
Capital gain 0.0200
 
 0.0115
 0.014
 0.020
 
Return of capital 
 0.1805
 0.0841
 
 
 0.180
 $1.3050
 $0.9450
 $0.8850
 $1.260
 $1.305
 $0.945

The following reconciles net income available to the Company's shareholders to taxable income available to common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 (in thousands):
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Net income available to the Company's shareholders $211,200
 $74,011
 $107,557
 $193,744
 $211,200
 $74,011
Book/tax difference on:            
Depreciation and amortization 12,446
 20,575
 (10,697) 1,666
 12,446
 20,575
Sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities (110,248) (9,524) (1,805) (8,688) (110,248) (9,524)
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures 6,772
 12,910
 5,601
 4,305
 6,772
 12,910
Share-based payment compensation 4,751
 (37,193) (3,818) 4,596
 4,751
 (37,193)
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture 
 
 (24,710) (91,467) 
 
Other differences (2,831) 1,205
 (5,823) 6,294
 (2,831) 1,205
Taxable income available to common shareholders $122,090
 $61,984
 $66,305
 $110,450
 $122,090
 $61,984

Revenue Recognition - Base rentals are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Straight-line rent adjustments recorded as a receivable in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets were approximately $40.6$46.8 million and $34.6$40.6 million as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively. As a provision of a tenant lease, if we make a cash payment to the tenant for purposes other than funding the construction of landlord assets, we defer the amount of such payments as a lease incentive. We amortize lease incentives as a reduction of base rental revenue over the term of the lease. Substantially all leases contain provisions which provide additional rents based on tenants' sales volume (“percentage rentals”) and reimbursement of the tenants' share of advertising and promotion, common area maintenance, insurance and real estate tax expenses. Percentage rentals are recognized when specified targets that trigger the contingent rent are met. Expense reimbursements are recognized in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. For certain tenants, we receive a fixed payment for common area maintenance ("CAM") which is recognized as revenue when earned. When not reimbursed by the fixed-CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses for the property. Payments received from the early termination of leases are recognized as revenue from the time the payment is receivable until the tenant vacates the space. The values of the above and below market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the original contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related above or below market lease value will be written off.


F-23




We receive development, leasing, loan guarantee, management and marketing fees from third parties and unconsolidated affiliates for services provided to properties held in joint ventures. Development and leasing fees received from unconsolidated affiliates are recognized as revenue when earned to the extent of the third party partners' ownership interest. Development and leasing fees earned to the extent of our ownership interest are recorded as a reduction to our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate. Loan guarantee fees are recognized over the term of the guarantee. Management fees and marketing fees are recognized as revenue when earned. Fees recognized from these activities are shown as management,management, leasing and other services in our consolidated statements of operations. Fees received from consolidated joint ventures are eliminated in consolidation.

Concentration of Credit Risk - We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our tenants. Although the tenants operate principally in the retail industry, the properties are geographically diverse. No single tenant accounted for 10% or more of combined base and percentage rental income or gross leasable area during 2016, 2015 2014 or 2013.2014.


F-21



Supplemental Cash Flow Information - We purchase capital equipment and incur costs relating to construction of new facilities, including tenant finishing allowances. Expenditures for these items included in trade payablesaccounts payable and accrued expenses were as offollows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 amounted to $28.7 million, $23.0 million and $9.8 million, respectively.(in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Costs relating to construction included in accounts payable and accrued expenses $22,908
 $28,665
 $23,033

Non-cash investing activities that occurred during 2014 related to the acquisitionSee Note 3, for additional non-cash information associated with our acquisitions of the remaining non-controlling interest in The Outlets at Hershey, as discussed in Note 3. In September 2011, we purchased substantially all of the economic interests in The Outlets at Hershey, a 248,000 square foot outlet center. A portion of the cash consideration paid to the buyer included a $6.2 million loan, which was included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, collateralized by their remaining ownership interest in the property. In October 2014, the loan was canceled in exchange for this remaining ownership interest in therental property.

A non-cash financing financing activity that occurred during the 2015 period related to a special dividend of $21.2 million that was declared in December 2015 and paid in January 2016. Non-cash financing activities that occurred during the 2013 period related to the acquisition of a controlling interest in Deer Park, as discussed in Note 3, included the assumption of debt totaling $237.9 million, and the issuance of $14.0 million in Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership as a portion of the consideration given. In addition, rental property and lease related intangible assets increased by $27.9 million related to the fair value of the one-third interest owned by Deer Park's other remaining partner and $26.0 million related to the fair value of our previously held interest in excess of carrying amount.

Interest paid, net of interest capitalized inwas as follows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $49.5 million, $55.4 million and $48.0 million, respectively.(in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Interest paid, net of interest capitalized $50,270
 $49,542
 $55,379

Accounting for Equity-Based Compensation - We have a shareholder approved equity-based compensation plan, the Incentive Award Plan of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (Amended and Restated as of April 4, 2014) (the "Plan"), which covers our independent directors, officers and our employees. We may issue non-qualified options and other equity-based awards under the Plan. We account for our equity-based compensation plan under the fair value provisions of the relevant accounting guidance.

Foreign Currency Translation - We have entered into a co-ownership agreement with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust to develop and acquire outlet centers in Canada for which the functional currency is the local currency. The assets and liabilities related to our investments in Canada are translated from their functional currency into U.S. Dollars at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date. Income statement accounts are translated using the average exchange rate for the period. Our share of unrealized gains and losses resulting from the translation of these financial statements are reflected in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets.

New Accounting Pronouncements - In April 2015,January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting StandardStandards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, Simplifying2017-01, Clarifying the PresentationDefinition of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented ina Business (Topic 805). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the balance sheet asdefinition of a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. Thebusiness and provides further guidance in the new standard is limited to the presentation of debt issuance costs. The standard does not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The new guidanceevaluating whether a transaction will be applied onaccounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a retrospective basis. The standardbusiness. ASU 2017-01 is effective for financialinterim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The update should be applied prospectively. We plan to adopt ASU 2017-01 as of January 1, 2017 and do not expect the adoption to require any additional disclosures. We believe most of our future acquisitions of operating properties will qualify as asset acquisitions and most future transaction costs associated with these acquisitions will be capitalized.


F-24




In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. This ASU requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash. Amounts generally described as restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The update should be applied retrospectively to each period presented.  The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, and the pronouncement will result in changes to our consolidated statements of cash flows such that restricted cash amounts will be included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period cash and cash equivalents totals.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control. This ASU modifies existing guidance with respect to how a decision maker that holds an indirect interest in a VIE through a common control party determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE as part of the analysis of whether the VIE would need to be consolidated. Under this ASU, a decision maker would need to consider only its proportionate indirect interest in the VIE held through a common control party. As a result of this ASU, in certain cases, previous consolidation conclusions may change. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015,2016. Since we have already adopted the amendments in ASU 2015-02 we are required to apply the amendments in this ASU, retrospectively to the beginning of 2016. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-17 to have a material impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, the Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), which finalizes Proposed ASU No. EITF-15F of the same name, and addresses stakeholders’ concerns regarding diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.years, with early adoption permitted. The ASU should be adopted using a retrospective transition approach. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance, but we do not expect thethe adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, resultsstatements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of operationsCredit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected versus incurred credit losses for financial assets held. This ASU will be applied on a prospective basis for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance, but we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, an option to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within that reporting period and may be applied on a modified retrospective basis as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting, this standard eliminates the requirement that when an existing cost method investment qualifies for use of the equity method, an investor must restate its historical financial statements, as if the equity method had been used during all previous periods. Under the new guidance, at the point an investment qualifies for the equity method, any unrealized gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) ("AOCI") will be recognized through earnings. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the guidance will be applied prospectively to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence occurring after the new standards effective date. Additional transition disclosures are not required upon adoption. We do not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


F-25




In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) – Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments (“ASU 2016-06”), which will reduce diversity of practice in identifying embedded derivatives in debt instruments. ASU 2016-06 clarifies that the nature of an exercise contingency is not subject to the “clearly and closely” criteria for purposes of assessing whether the call or put option must be separated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative. ASU No. 2016-06 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities are required to apply the guidance to existing debt instruments using a modified retrospective transition method as of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02, codified in ASC 842, amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU 2016-02 will be effective beginning in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption of ASU 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. Based on a preliminary assessment, we expect our significant operating lease commitments, primarily ground leases, will be required to be recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in an increase in the assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We are continuing our evaluation, which may identify additional impacts this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We expect that the adoption of this standard duringDuring the first quarter of 2016, willwe adopted ASU No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" and this adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, but may result in additional disclosures.flows.


F-22



In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide certain disclosures when it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued.issued and provide related disclosures. This ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending December 31, 2016 and for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine theadopted this standard as of December 31, 2016. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact it may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014,balance sheets, statements of operations, cash flows or disclosures but may result in more disclosure surrounding the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (the "Final Standard"). Under the Final Standard, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations (e.g., a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business or a major equity method investment) will be presented as discontinued operations. Under previous GAAP, companies that sold a single investment property were generally required to report the sale as a discontinued operation, which required the companies to reclassify earnings from continuing operationsCompany's plans for all periods presented. The Final Standard is effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public entities with calendar year ends. The FASB will permit early adoption of the Final Standard, beginning in the first quarter of 2014, but only for disposals or classifications as held for sale that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. We early adopted the standard in the first quarter of 2014. See Note 4 Disposition of Properties and Properties Held for Sale for further information.addressing significant upcoming debt maturities.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are required to adopt the new pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using one of two retrospective application methods. In March, April and May 2016 the FASB issued the following amendments to clarify the implementation guidance: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing and ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)—Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. We will adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018. We have identified our revenue streams and are currentlyin the process of evaluating the new guidance to determineimpact on our consolidated financial statements and internal accounting processes; however, as the majority of our revenue is derived from real estate lease contracts we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 or related amendments and modifications by the FASB will have a material impact it may have on the amount of revenue we recognize in our consolidated financial statements.

Operating Partnership Unit Split - In August 2013, the Operating Partnership's operating agreement was amended to, among other things, effect a four-for-one split of the outstanding partnership units After the effect of the split, each Class A common limited partnership unit held by Non-Company LPs may be exchanged for one common share of the Company. Prior to the split, each unit held by the Non-Company LPs was exchangeable for four common shares of the Company. All references to the number of units outstanding and per unit amounts reflect the effect of the split for all periods presented.
F-26




Reclassifications - WeAs a result of the adoption on January 1, 2016 of FASB ASU No. 2015-03 Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, our deferred debt origination costs and related accumulated amortization previously recorded in the line item “deferred debt origination costs, net” have revisedbeen reclassified from assets to the previously reported amountsrespective debt line items within the liabilities section in the consolidated statementbalance sheet as of cash flows to reclassify approximately $2.1 million related to tax increment financing for the year ended December 31, 2014 to the caption "additions to rental property" from the caption "proceeds from tax increment financing" to conform to the presentation of the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015. We have concluded theThe reclassification decreased previously reported financial statements were not materially misstated as a result of this revision.total assets and total liabilities by $11.9 million.


F-23



3.    Acquisition of Rental Property

2016 Acquisitions

Savannah

In August 2016, the Savannah joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Pooler, Georgia distributed all outparcels along with $15.0 million in cash consideration to the other partner in exchange for the partner's ownership interest. We contributed the $15.0 million in cash consideration to the joint venture, which we funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. At the time of acquisition, the property was subject to a $96.9 million construction loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%, that would have matured in May 2017. In September 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.

The former joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and was consolidated in our financial results as of the acquisition date.  Prior to this transaction, we owned a 50% legal interest in the joint venture since its formation and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. However, due to preferred equity contributions we made to the joint venture, and the returns earned on those contributions, our estimated economic interest in the book value of the assets was approximately 98%. Therefore, substantially all of the earnings of the joint venture were previously recognized by us as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures. 
There was no contingent consideration associated with this acquisition. The joint venture incurred approximately $260,000 in third-party acquisition related costs for the acquisition of the venture partner's interest that were expensed as incurred. As a result of acquiring the remaining interest in the Savannah joint venture, we recorded a gain of $46.3 million which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our previously held equity method investment in the joint venture.

Non-cash investing activities related to the purchase of our partners' interest in the Savannah joint venture, include the assumption of debt totaling $96.9 million. In addition, rental property and lease related intangible assets and liabilities increased by a net of $46.3 million related to the fair value of our previously held interest in excess of our carrying amount; prepaids and other assets increased $250,000 and accounts payable and accrued expenses increased $2.1 million from the assumption of current assets and liabilities.

Westgate

In June 2016, we completed the purchase of our partners' interest in the Westgate joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Glendale, Arizona, for a total cash price of approximately $40.9 million. Prior to the transaction, we owned a 58% interest in the Westgate joint venture since its formation in 2012 and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. The former joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and was consolidated in our financial results as of June 30, 2016.

The total cash price included $39.0 million to acquire the 40% ownership interest held by the equity partner in the joint venture. We also purchased the remaining 2% noncontrolling ownership interests in the Westgate outlet center held in a consolidated partnership for a purchase price of $1.9 million. The acquisition of the noncontrolling ownership interest was recorded as an equity transaction and, as a result, the carrying balances of the noncontrolling interest were eliminated and the remaining difference between the purchase price and carrying balance was recorded as a reduction in additional-paid-in-capital. We funded the total purchase price with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. At the time of the acquisition, the property was subject to a $62.0 million mortgage loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.75% and a maturity in June 2017. In August 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan in full with proceeds from the public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2026.


F-27




There was no contingent consideration associated with this acquisition. We incurred approximately $127,000 in third-party acquisition related costs for the acquisition of our partners' interest in the Westgate joint venture that were expensed as incurred. As a result of acquiring the remaining interest in the Westgate joint venture, we recorded a gain of $49.3 million which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our previously held equity method investment in the joint venture.

Non-cash investing activities related to the purchase of our partners' interest in the Westgate joint venture, include the assumption of debt totaling $62.0 million. In addition, rental property and lease related intangible assets and liabilities increased by a net of $49.3 million related to the fair value of our previously held interest in excess of our carrying amount; prepaids and other assets increased $227,000 and accounts payable and accrued expenses increased $5.0 million from the assumption of current assets and liabilities.

The following table illustrates the fair value of the aggregate consideration transferred to acquire the equity interests of the Savannah and Westgate properties at the acquisition date for the year ended 2016 (in thousands):
Cash transferred for equity interests$54,000
Fair value of our previously held interests145,581
Fair value of net assets$199,581

The following table illustrates the aggregate fair value of the amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed and recognized at the acquisition date for the Savannah and Westgate properties acquired during the year ended 2016:
  
Fair Value
 (in thousands)
 Weighted-Average Amortization Period (in years)
Cash $8,781
  
Land 27,593
  
Buildings, improvements and fixtures 308,117
  
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles    
Above market lease value 15,882
 7.2
Lease in place value 13,972
 5.9
Lease and legal costs 10,264
 6.4
Total deferred lease costs and other intangibles 40,118
  
Prepaids and other assets 477
  
Debt (158,994)  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (7,183)  
Other liabilities (below market lease value) (19,328) 12.0
Total fair value of net assets $199,581
  

The fair values were determined based on an income approach, using a rental growth rate of 3.0%, a discount rate between 7.50% and 8.25%, and a terminal capitalization rate between 5.75% and 7.0%. The estimated fair values were determined to have primarily relied upon Level 3 inputs, as defined in Note 12.

The Company has finalized the valuations and completed the purchase price allocations. During the measurement period, we adjusted the Westgate purchase price allocation based upon information that was received subsequent to the acquisition date that related to conditions that existed as of that date. This adjustment increased above market lease value by $1.6 million, and decreased buildings, improvements and fixtures by $5.6 million, below market lease value by $4.8 million, lease in place value by $628,000 and land by $150,000.


F-28




2014 AcquisitionsAcquisition

In September 2011, we purchased substantially all of the economic interests in The Outlets at Hershey, a 248,000 square foot outlet center. A portion of the cash consideration paid to the buyer included a $6.2 million loan, which was included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, collateralized by their remaining ownership interest in the property. In October 2014, the loan was canceled in exchange for this remaining ownership interest in the property.

2013 Acquisitions

In August 2013, Deer Park completed a refinancing of its existing debt and then immediately restructured the ownership whereby we acquired an additional ownership interest in the property from one of the partners which gave us a controlling interest. With the acquisition of this additional interest, we have consolidated the property for financial reporting purposes since the acquisition date, and remeasured our previously held interest that was accounted for as an equity method investment.

Prior to the acquisition, Deer Park successfully negotiated new financing of the debt obligations for the previous mortgage and mezzanine loans totaling approximately $238.5 million, with a $150.0 million mortgage loan. The new five year mortgage loan bears interest at a 150 basis point spread over LIBOR. The previous mortgage and mezzanine loans were in default, and as part of the refinancing, all default interest associated with the loans was waived. Utilizing funding from our existing unsecured lines of credit, we loaned approximately $89.5 million at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% and due on August 30, 2020 to the Deer Park joint venture representing the remaining amount necessary to repay the previous mortgage and mezzanine loans. As a result of the refinancing, Deer Park recorded a gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $13.8 million. Our share of this gain along with our share of the income from the settlement of a lawsuit by Deer Park with a third party totaled approximately $7.8 million, which has been included in equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Subsequent to the debt extinguishment, we acquired an additional one-third interest in the Deer Park property from one of the owners, bringing our total ownership to a two-thirds interest, for total consideration of approximately $27.9 million, including $13.9 million in cash and 450,576 in Class A common limited partnership units of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership, which are exchangeable for an equivalent number of the Company's common shares. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination resulting in the assets acquired and liabilities assumed being recorded at fair value as a result of the step acquisition. Prior to the acquisition, the joint venture was considered a variable interest entity and was accounted for under the equity method of accounting since we did not have the ability to direct the significant activities that affect the economic performance of the venture as a one-third owner. Upon acquiring an additional one-third interest, we determined, based on the acquisition agreement and other transaction documents which amended our rights with respect to the property and our obligations with respect to the additional one-third interest, that we control the property assets and direct the propertys significant activities and therefore, consolidate the propertys assets and liabilities.
The following table illustrates the fair value of the total consideration transferred and the amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):

Cash transferred$13,939
Common limited partnership units issued13,981
Fair value of total consideration transferred to acquire one-third interest27,920
Fair value of our previously held one-third interest27,920
Fair value of noncontrolling interest27,920
Fair value of net assets acquired$83,760




F-24




The aggregate purchase price of the property was allocated as follows:

  
Fair Value
 (in thousands)
 Weighted-Average Amortization Period (in years)
Land $82,413
  
Buildings, improvements and fixtures 172,694
  
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles    
Above market lease value 18,807
 11.9
Below market lease value (12,658) 18.5
Lease in place value 28,846
 7.6
Tenant relationships 27,594
 19.0
Lease and legal costs 1,724
 8.9
Total deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net 64,313
  
Other identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net 2,265
  
Debt (237,925)  
Total fair value of net assets acquired $83,760
  

There was no contingent consideration associated with this acquisition. We incurred approximately $1.0 million in third-party acquisition costs which were expensed as incurred. As a part of the acquisition accounting, we recorded a gain of $26.0 million which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our previously held equity method investment in Deer Park.

Following the acquisition, we and the noncontrolling interest restructured certain aspects of our ownership of the property, whereby we receive substantially all of the economics generated by the property and would have substantial control over the property's financial activities. We and the noncontrolling interest entered into a triple net lease agreement with a different wholly-owned subsidiary of ours which operates the property as lessee. Under the new structure, we will serve as property manager and control the management, leasing, marketing and other operations of the property. We and the noncontrolling interest will receive, in proportion to our respective ownership interests, fixed annual lease payments of approximately $2.5 million, plus an amount necessary to pay the interest expense on debt related to the property. In addition, we and the noncontrolling interest have entered into an agreement whereby they may require us to acquire their ownership interest in the property on the second anniversary of the acquisition date for a price of $28.4 million, and we have the option to acquire their ownership interest on the fourth anniversary of the acquisition date at the same price. On September 30, 2015, the noncontrolling interest in our Deer Park outlet center, exercised its right to require us to acquire its ownership interest. The transaction closed on January 5, 2016. The obligation to acquire its interest is recorded as a deferred financing obligation in the other liabilities section of our consolidated balance sheet.

F-25



The results of operations from the property are included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning on the acquisition date. The aggregate revenues and net loss from the property from the acquisition date through December 31, 2013, were $11.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2013 is presented as if the acquisition had been consummated as of January 1, 2012, the beginning of the previous reporting period (in thousands, except per share data):
  (unaudited)
  (Pro forma)
  Year ended
  December 31,
  2013
Total Revenue $408,333
Income from continuing operations 85,836
Net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 80,621
Basic earnings per common share 0.86
Diluted earnings per common share 0.86

Supplemental pro forma earnings for 2013 were adjusted to exclude $1.0 million of third-party acquisition costs incurred in 2013 and $26.0 million of nonrecurring gain related to the fair value adjustment.




F-26



4. Disposition of Properties and Properties Held for Sale

The following table sets forth the properties sold for the years ended 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Properties Locations Date Sold Square Feet Net Sales Proceeds Gain on Sale
2015 Dispositions:          
Barstow Barstow, CA October 2015 171
 $105,793
 $86,506
Kittery I and II, Tuscola, and West Branch Kittery, ME, Tuscola, IL, and West Branch, MI September 2015 439
 $43,304
 $20,215
           
2014 Dispositions:          
Lincoln City Lincoln City, OR December 2014 270
 $38,993
 $7,513

The rental properties did not meet the criteria set forth in the newly-adopted guidance for reporting discontinued operations (See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), thus their results of operations have remained in continuing operations.

2015 Dispositions

During 2015, we sold our Kittery I & II, Tuscola, and West Branch and Barstow outlet centers for a gain of $106.7 million, in aggregate, and we received a combined net proceeds of $149.1 million of which $121.3 million is recorded in restricted cash as of December 31, 2015. The restricted cash represents the cash proceeds from property sales that are being held by a qualified intermediary in anticipation of such amounts subsequently being invested in a tax efficient manner under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2014 Dispositions and assets held for sale

In the fourth quarter of 2014, we entered into an agreement with a private buyer to acquire our outlet center in Lincoln City, Oregon along with an option agreement to purchase an additional four properties, which have been classified as rental property held for sale as of December 31, 2014 on the consolidated balance sheets. Subsequently, the buyer purchased the Lincoln City outlet center in December 2014 for a gain of $7.5 million, but during 2015 chose not to exercise the option to purchase the additional four properties. In July 2015, we concluded that the sale of these four additional outlet centers was no longer probable, reclassified the assets from held for sale to held and used, and recorded an adjustment of approximately $1.6 million representing the depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the properties been continuously classified as held and used.

The carrying values of the assets classified as rental property held for sale at December 31, 2014 totaled $46.0 million and were comprised of the following (in thousands):
  2014
Rental property, net $43,532
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net 757
Prepaids and other assets 1,716
Rental property held for sale $46,005
Properties Locations Date Sold Square Feet Net Sales Proceeds Gain on Sale
           
2016 Dispositions:(1)
          
Fort Myers (2)
 Fort Myers, FL January 2016 199
 $25,785
 $4,887
Land outparcel Myrtle Beach, SC September 2016 
 $2,921
 1,418
          $6,305
           
2015 Dispositions:(1)(3)
          
Barstow Barstow, CA October 2015 171
 $105,793
 $86,506
Kittery I and II, Tuscola, and West Branch Kittery, ME, Tuscola, IL, and West Branch, MI September 2015 439
 $43,304
 20,215
          $106,721
           
2014 Dispositions:(1)
          
Lincoln City Lincoln City, OR December 2014 270
 $38,993
 $7,513
(1)The rental properties did not meet the criteria set forth in the guidance for reporting discontinued operations (See Note 2), thus their results of operations have remained in continuing operations.
(2)The proceeds from the sale of this unencumbered asset were used to pay down balances outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit.
(3)We received combined net proceeds of $149.1 million of which $121.3 million was recorded in restricted cash as of December 31, 2015. The restricted cash represented the cash proceeds from property sales that were being held by a qualified intermediary for such amounts subsequently being invested in the 2016 period in a tax efficient manner under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.



F-27F-29




5. Development of Consolidated Rental Properties

FoxwoodsDaytona Beach

In May 2015,November 2016, we opened an approximately 312,000 square foot outlet center at the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Mashantucket, Connecticut. We own a controlling interest in the joint venture which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. As of December 31, 2015, our partner’s equity contributions totaled approximately $1.0 million and our equity contributions totaled approximately $58.8 million. Contributions we make in excess of $40.0 million earn a preferred rate of return of 15% from the date of contribution. In addition, each partner earns a rate of return of 10% on their initial capital contributions from the date of contribution. Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our partner. Accordingly, we expect our current economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage of 67%. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value, our economic interest would represent substantially all of the economic benefit of the property. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.

Grand Rapids

In July 2015, we opened an approximately 352,000349,000 square foot, wholly-owned, outlet center near Grand Rapids, Michigan. Thein Daytona Beach, Florida. This outlet center is located 11 miles south of downtown Grand Rapids at the southwest quadrant of US-131features over 80 brand name and 84th Street in Byron Township, Michigan, with visibility from both roads.

Southaven

In November 2015, we opened an approximately 320,000 square footdesigner outlet center in Southaven, Mississippi. In January 2015, we purchased land for approximately $14.8 million and commenced construction on the development of Tanger Outlets Southaven, which is located less than five miles south of Memphis, Tennessee. We own a controlling interest in the joint venture which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. As of December 31, 2015, our partner’s equity contributions totaled approximately $461,000stores.and our equity contributions totaled approximately $26.5 million. From the date our equity contributions are made, we earn a preferred rate of return of 10% for senior contributions and 14% for junior contributions. As of December 31, 2015, the balance of our senior contributions was $17.7 million and our junior contributions was $8.3 million.

Under the terms of the joint venture's operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive all of our unreturned contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our partner. Accordingly, we expect our current economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage of 50%. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value, our economic interest would represent substantially all of the economic benefit of the property. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset sales.

The table below sets forth our consolidated outlet centers under development as of December 31, 2015:2016:
ProjectApproximate square feet
(in 000's)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
Borrowed to date
(in millions)
Projected OpeningApproximate square feet
(in 000's)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
(1)
Projected Opening
Daytona Beach352
$17.3

Holiday 2016
New development:   
Fort Worth352
$19.8
Holiday 2017
   
Expansion:   
Lancaster123
15.4
Q3 2017
   
Total475
$35.2
 
(1)Amounts funded by our unsecured lines of credit.

Daytona BeachFort Worth

In November 2015,September 2016, we purchased land in the greater Fort Worth, Texas area for approximately $9.9$11.2 million and commencedbegan construction immediately on the development of a wholly ownedwholly-owned outlet center. The outlet center will be located within the 279-acre Champions Circle mixed-use development adjacent to Texas Motor Speedway.

Lancaster Expansion

In July 2016, we commenced construction on a 123,000 square foot expansion of our outlet center in Daytona Beach, Florida. The outlet center is expected to be approximately 352,000 square feet and to open by Holiday 2016.Lancaster, Pennsylvania.


F-28F-30




6. Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures asThe equity method of December 31, 2015 and 2014 aggregated $201.1 million and $208.0 million, respectively. We have evaluated the accounting treatmentis used to account for each of the joint ventures and have concluded based on the current facts and circumstances that the equity method of accounting should be used to account for the individual joint ventures. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we were members ofWe have an ownership interest in the following unconsolidated real estate joint ventures:

As of December 31, 2015
Joint Venture Outlet Center Location Ownership % 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) 
Total Joint Venture Debt
(in millions)
Columbus Columbus, OH 50.0% 
 $21.1
 $
National Harbor National Harbor, MD 50.0% 339
 6.1
 87.0
RioCan Canada Various 50.0% 870
 117.2
 11.3
Savannah (1)
 Savannah, GA 50.0% 377
 44.4
 89.5
Westgate Glendale, AZ 58.0% 411
 12.3
 62.0
        $201.1
 $249.8
           
Charlotte(2)
 Charlotte, NC 50.0% 398
 $(1.1) $90.0
Galveston/Houston (2)
 Texas City, TX 50.0% 353
 (1.5) 65.0
        $(2.6) $155.0
As of December 31, 2016
Joint Venture Outlet Center Location Ownership % 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) 
Total Joint Venture Debt, Net
(in millions)(1)
Columbus Columbus, OH 50.0% 355
 $6.7
 $84.2
National Harbor National Harbor, MD 50.0% 341
 4.1
 86.1
RioCan Canada Various 50.0% 901
 117.3
 11.1
        $128.1
 $181.4
           
Charlotte(3)
 Charlotte, NC 50.0% 398
 $(2.5) $89.7
Galveston/Houston (3)
 Texas City, TX 50.0% 353
 (3.8) 64.9
        $(6.3) $154.6

As of December 31, 2014
As of December 31, 2015As of December 31, 2015
Joint Venture Outlet Center Location Ownership % 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) 
Total Joint Venture Debt
(in millions)
 Outlet Center Location Ownership % 
Square Feet
(in 000's)
 Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) 
Total Joint Venture Debt, Net
(in millions)(1)
Galveston/Houston Texas City, TX 50.0% 353
 $1.3
 $65.0
Columbus Columbus, OH 50.0% 
 $21.1
 $
National Harbor National Harbor, MD 50.0% 339
 9.5
 83.7
 National Harbor, MD 50.0% 339
 6.1
 85.8
RioCan Canada Various 50.0% 870
 132.5
 15.7
 Various 50.0% 870
 117.2
 11.3
Savannah (1)(2)
 Savannah, GA 50.0% 
 46.5
 25.5
 Savannah, GA 50.0% 377
 44.4
 87.6
Westgate Glendale, AZ 58.0% 381
 14.3
 54.0
 Glendale, AZ 58.0% 411
 12.3
 61.9
Wisconsin Dells Wisconsin Dells, WI 50.0% 265
 2.4
 24.3
Other   
 1.5
 
     $208.0
 $268.2
     $201.1
 $246.6
                
Charlotte(2)
 Charlotte, NC 50.0% 398
 $(2.2) $90.0
Charlotte(3)
 Charlotte, NC 50.0% 398
 $(1.1) $89.6
Galveston/Houston(3)
 Texas City, TX 50.0% 353
 $(1.5) $64.7
     $(2.2) $90.0
     $(2.6) $154.3
(1)Net of debt origination costs and including premiums of $1.6 million and $3.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(2)Based on capital contribution and distribution provisions in the joint venture agreement, we expect our economic interest in the venture's cash flow to bewas greater than indicated in the Tanger Ownership column, which states our legal interest in this venture. As of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receivehave received from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value, our estimated economic interest in the venture was approximately 98%. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from gains or losses of asset sales.
(2)(3)The negative carrying value is due to the distributions of proceeds from mortgage loans and quarterly distributions of excess cash flow exceeding the original contributions from the partners.




F-29F-31




Fees we received for various services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures were recognized in management, leasing and other services as follows (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Fees:            
Development and leasing $1,827
 $725
 $595
 $651
 $1,827
 $725
Loan guarantee 746
 463
 161
 452
 746
 463
Management and marketing 2,853
 2,403
 2,324
 2,744
 2,853
 2,403
Total Fees $5,426
 $3,591
 $3,080
 $3,847
 $5,426
 $3,591

Our investments in real estate joint ventures are reduced by the percentage of the profits earned for leasing and development services associated with our ownership interest in each joint venture. Our carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures differs from our share of the assets reported in the “Summary“Condensed Combined Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” shown below due to adjustments to the book basis, including intercompany profits on sales of services that are capitalized by the unconsolidated joint ventures. The differences in basis (totaling $3.9$3.7 million and $4.4$3.9 million as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively) are amortized over the various useful lives of the related assets.

Charlotte

In July 2014, we opened an approximately 398,000 square foot outlet center in Charlotte, North Carolina that was developed through, and is owned by, a joint venture formed in May 2013. The outlet center is located eight miles southwest of uptown Charlotte at the interchange of I-485 and Steele Creek Road (North Carolina Highway 160). Construction of the outlet center, which commenced during the third quarter of 2013, was initially funded with equal equity contributions by the partners. In November 2014, the joint venture closed on an interest onlyinterest-only mortgage loan for $90.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.45%. The loan initially matures in November 2018, with the option to extend the maturity for one additional year. The joint venture received net loan proceeds of $89.4 million and distributed them equally to the partners. The loan balance as of December 31, 2015 was approximately $90.0 million. Our partner is providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture. During construction, we provided development services to the joint venture and joint leasing services with our partner.

Columbus

During the second quarter of 2015, the joint venture purchased land forIn June 2016, we opened an approximately $8.9 million and began construction on a 350,000355,000 square foot outlet center in Columbus, Ohio. We and our partner currently expect to complete construction in time to open the center during the second quarter of 2016. The construction of the center is currently being funded with equity contributions from the partners. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we and our partner had each contributed $20.6$47.5 million to fund development activities. OurIn November 2016, the joint venture closed on an interest-only mortgage loan of $85.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. The loan initially matures in November 2019, with two one-year extension options. The joint venture received net loan proceeds of $84.2 million and distributed them equally to the partners. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture. During construction, our partner is providingprovided development services to the joint venture and we, along with our partner, are providingprovided joint leasing services. Once the center opens, we will provide property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.

Galveston/Houston

In October 2012, we opened an approximately 353,000 square foot outlet center in Texas City, Texas that was developed through, and is owned by, a joint venture formed in June 2011. The development was initially fully funded with equity contributed to the joint venture by Tanger and its partner. In July 2013, the joint venture closed on a $70.0 million mortgage loan with a rate of LIBOR + 1.50% and a maturity date of July 2017, with the option to extend the maturity for one additional year. The joint venture received total loan proceeds of $65.0 million and distributed the net proceeds equally to the partners. We used our share of the proceeds to reduce amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the outlet center.


F-30F-32




National Harbor

In November 2013, we opened an approximately 339,000341,000 square foot outlet center at National Harbor in the Washington, D.C. Metro area that was developed through, and is owned by, a joint venture formed in May 2011. In November 2014, the joint venture amended the initial construction loan to increase the amount available to borrow from $62.0 million to $87.0 million and extended the maturity date until November 2019. The loan carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. At the closing of the amendment, the joint venture distributed approximately $19.0 million equally between the partners. The loan balance as of December 31, 20152016 was approximately $87.0 million. We are providing property management, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.

RioCan Canada

We have a 50/50 co-ownership agreement with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust to develop and acquire outlet centers in Canada. Under the agreement, any outlet centers developed or acquired will be branded as Tanger Outlet Centers. We have agreed to provide leasing and marketing services for the outlet centers and RioCan has agreed to provide development and property management services.

In October 2014, the co-owners opened Tanger Outlets Ottawa, the first ground up development of a Tanger Outlet Center in Canada. Located in suburban Kanata offIn March 2016, the TransCanada Highway (Highway 417) at Palladium Drive, the outlet center currently contains approximately 284,000 square feet, with additional square footage totalingco-owners opened an approximately 28,000 square feetfoot expansion related to an anchor tenant bringing the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 316,000 square feet. In 2016, the co-owners commenced construction on a 40,000 square foot expansion, which is expected to be completed and opened in early 2016. open during the second quarter of 2017.

In November 2014, the co-owners opened an approximately 149,000 square foot expansion to the existing Cookstown Outlet Mall, bringing the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 309,000308,000 square feet.

Other properties owned by the RioCan Canada co-owners include Les Factoreries Saint-Sauveur and Bromont Outlet Mall. Les Factoreries Saint-Sauveur is located northwest of Montreal adjacent to Highway 15 in the town of Saint-Sauveur, Quebec and is approximately 116,000 square feet. Thefeet and the Bromont Outlet Mall is located east of Montreal near the eastern townships adjacent to Highway 10 in the town of Bromont, Quebec and is approximately 161,000 square feet.

SavannahRental property held and used by our joint ventures are reviewed for impairment in the event that facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such an event, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset is compared to the asset's carrying amount, and if less than such carrying amount, recognize an impairment loss in an amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair value.

In April 2015, we opened an approximately 377,000 square footDuring 2016, the joint venture determined for its Bromont, Quebec outlet center that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of that property did not exceed the property's carrying value based on the reduction in Savannah, Georgia. Asthe property's net operating income. Therefore, the joint venture recorded a $5.8 million non-cash impairment charge in its statement of December 31, 2015, our equity contributions totaled $45.8 million and our partner’s equity contributions totaled $8.3 million. Contributions we made inoperations, which equaled the excess of our partners' equity contributions are considered preferred equity and earned a preferred rate of return equal to 8% from the dateproperty's carrying value over its fair value. The fair value was determined using the contributions were made until the outlet center’s grand opening in April 2015, and will earn 10% annually thereafter. Under the terms ofincome approach whereby the joint venture'sventure considered the prevailing market income capitalization rates and stabilized net operating agreement, upon liquidation, we would receive allincome projections. Our share of this impairment charge, $2.9 million, was recorded in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures in our unreturned preferred equity contributions and all unpaid returns earned on those contributions prior to any distributions being made to our equity partner. Asconsolidated statement of December 31, 2015, based upon the liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based at depreciated book value, our estimated economic interest in the venture was approximately 98%. Our economic interest may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including mortgage financing, partnership capital contributions and distributions, and proceeds from asset salesoperations..

Savannah

In May 2014,2016, the joint venture closed on a construction loan withexpanded the ability to borrow up to $97.7 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. In September 2015, the loan maximum borrowing amount was increased to $100.9 million. The construction loan has a maturity date of May 21, 2017, with two, one -year extension options. As of December 31, 2015, the balance on the loan was $89.5 million. The additional $11.4 million is available for construction of theoutlet center in Savannah by approximately 42,000 square foot expansion that is currently in process. We are providing development, management and marketing services to the joint venture; and with our partner, are jointly providing leasing services tofeet, bringing the outlet center. center's total gross leasable area to approximately 419,000 square feet.


F-31As described in Note 3, we acquired our partners' interest in the Savannah joint venture in August 2016 and have consolidated the property for financial reporting purposes since the acquisition date.



Westgate/Glendale

In November 2012,As described in Note 3, we openedacquired our Westgate outlet center, locatedpartners' interest in Glendale, Arizona, which was developed through, and currently owned by, athe Westgate joint venture that was formed in May 2012.June 2016 and have consolidated the property for financial reporting purposes since the acquisition date.

During the first quarter of 2015, the joint venture completed the remaining 28,000 square feet of a 78,000 square foot expansion of the existing property which upon completion increased the total square feet of the outlet center to approximately 411,000 square feet. Construction commenced on the expansion during the second quarter of 2014 and was funded with borrowings under the amended Westgate mortgage loan. The joint venture's amended and restated construction loan is fully funded with a balance of $62.0 million as of December 31, 2015. The loan initially matured in June 2015, and during the second quarter of 2015 the joint venture exercised the two year option to extend the maturity date of the loan to June 2017. We are providing property management, construction supervision, marketing and leasing services to the joint venture.
F-33




Wisconsin Dells

In February 2015, we sold our equity interest in the joint venture that owned the outlet center located in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin for approximately $15.6 million, representing our share of the sales price totaling $27.7 million less our share of the outstanding debt, which totaled $12.1 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of approximately $13.7 million in the first quarter of 2015, which representsrepresented the difference between the carrying value of our equity method investment and the net proceeds received.

Condensed combined summary financial information of joint ventures accounted for using the equity method as of December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 is as follows (in thousands):
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Joint Ventures 2015 2014 2016 2015
Assets        
Land $103,046
 $102,601
 $88,015
 $103,046
Buildings, improvements and fixtures 615,662
 542,501
 503,548
 615,662
Construction in progress, including land under development 62,308
 104,780
 13,037
 62,308
 781,016
 749,882
 604,600
 781,016
Accumulated depreciation (60,629) (48,233) (67,431) (60,629)
Total rental property, net 720,387
 701,649
 537,169
 720,387
Cash and cash equivalents 28,723
 46,917
 27,271
 28,723
Deferred lease costs, net 18,399
 21,234
 13,612
 18,399
Deferred debt origination costs, net 3,909
 5,995
Prepaids and other assets 14,455
 12,766
 12,567
 14,455
Total assets $785,873
 $788,561
 $590,619
 $781,964
Liabilities and Owners' Equity        
Mortgages payable $404,844
 $358,219
Mortgages payable, net $335,971
 $400,935
Accounts payable and other liabilities 31,805
 70,795
 20,011
 31,805
Total liabilities 436,649
 429,014
 355,982
 432,740
Owners' equity 349,224
 359,547
 234,637
 349,224
Total liabilities and owners' equity $785,873
 $788,561
 $590,619
 $781,964


F-32F-34




Condensed Combined Statements of Operations- Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Revenues (1)
 $106,042
 $78,625
 $85,682
 $106,766
 $106,042
 $78,625
Expenses:            
Property operating 40,639
 30,986
 31,610
 39,576
 40,639
 30,986
General and administrative 571
 621
 977
 349
 571
 621
Acquisition costs 
 
 477
Asset impairment 5,838
 
 
Abandoned development costs 
 472
 153
 
 
 472
Depreciation and amortization 34,516
 23,426
 26,912
 32,930
 34,516
 23,426
Total expenses 75,726
 55,505
 60,129
 78,693
 75,726
 55,505
Operating income 30,316
 23,120
 25,553
 28,073
 30,316
 23,120
Gain on early extinguishment of debt (2)
 
 
 13,820
Interest expense (8,674) (5,459) (11,602) (8,946) (8,674) (5,459)
Other nonoperating income 19
 
 $
Other non-operating income 6
 19
 
Net income $21,661
 $17,661

$27,771
 $19,133
 $21,661

$17,661
The Company and Operating Partnership's share of:            
Net income $11,484
 $9,053
 $11,040
 $10,872
 $11,484
 $9,053
Depreciation and asset impairments (real estate related) (2)
 20,052
 12,212
 12,419
Depreciation and asset impairments (real estate related) $21,829
 $20,052
 $12,212
(1)Note that revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 include approximately $9.5 million of other income from the settlement of a lawsuit at Deer Park prior to our acquisition of an additional one-third interest in and the consolidation of the property.
(2)Represents a gain on early extinguishment of debt that was recorded as part of the refinancing of the debt at Deer Park in August 2013 (See Note 3).



F-33F-35





7.    Deferred Charges

Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net as of December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 consist of the following (in thousands):
 2015 2014 2016 2015
Deferred lease costs $70,379
 $61,205
 $76,733
 $70,379
Intangible assets:        
Above market leases 43,340
 44,144
 57,077
 43,340
Lease in place value 68,194
 69,893
 77,858
 68,194
Tenant relationships 55,538
 57,230
 52,925
 55,538
Other intangibles 42,614
 42,789
 52,346
 42,614
 280,065
 275,261
 316,939
 280,065
Accumulated amortization (152,976) (134,378) (165,360) (152,976)
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net $127,089
 $140,883
 $151,579
 $127,089

Below market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 were $10.4$27.6 million and $12.9$10.4 million, respectively.

Amortization of deferred lease costs and other intangibles, excluding above and below market leases, included in depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $16.8 million, $16.7 million $20.9 million and $19.8$20.9 million, respectively.

Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles recorded as an increase or (decrease) in base rentals for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $(2.8) million, $(2.0) million and $(2.8) million, and $(686,000), respectively.
 
Estimated aggregate amortization of net above and below market leases and other intangibles for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):
Year Above/below market leases, net Deferred lease costs and other intangibles 
Above/below market leases, net (1)
 
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles (2)
2016 $2,142
 $9,652
2017 2,087
 7,943
 $2,566
 $11,462
2018 1,926
 7,022
 2,358
 9,882
2019 463
 4,809
 876
 7,678
2020 113
 4,079
 406
 6,567
2021 243
 5,747
Total $6,731
 $33,505
 $6,449
 $41,336
(1)These amounts are recorded as a reduction of base rentals.
(2)These amounts are recorded as an increase in depreciation and amortization.


Deferred debt origination costs, net as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 consist of the following (in thousands):
  2015 2014
Deferred debt origination costs $24,955
 $22,126
Accumulated amortization (13,073) (10,000)
Deferred debt origination costs, net $11,882
 $12,126
F-36

Amortization of deferred debt origination costs included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $2.7 million, $2.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.


F-34



8.    Debt of the Company

All of the Company's debt is held by the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The Company guarantees the Operating Partnership's obligations with respect to its unsecured lines of credit which have a total borrowing capacity of $520.0 million. The Company also guarantees the Operating Partnership's unsecured term loan. In addition, as of December 31, 2014, the Company guaranteed the Operating Partnership's obligation with respect to the mortgage assumed in connection with the acquisition of the outlet center in Ocean City, Maryland in July 2011. The Ocean City mortgage was subsequently repaid in July 2015.

The Operating Partnership had the following amounts outstanding on the debt guaranteed by the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 December 31, 2015
 December 31, 2014
 2016 2015
Unsecured lines of credit $190,300
 $111,000
 $61,000
 $190,300
Unsecured term loan $250,000
 $250,000
 $325,000
 $250,000
Ocean City mortgage $
 $17,926

9.    Debt of the Operating Partnership

DebtThe debt of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 consistsconsisted of the following (in thousands):
     As of As of        
     December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014     2016 2015
 Stated Interest Rate(s) Maturity Date Principal 
Premium
 (Discount)
 Principal 
Premium
 (Discount)
 Stated Interest Rate(s) Maturity Date Principal 
Book Value(1)
 Principal 
Book Value(1)
Senior, unsecured notes:      
      
      
      
            
Senior notes 6.125% June 2020
 $300,000
 $298,226
 $300,000
 $297,739
Senior notes 6.125% June 2020
 $300,000
 $(1,071) $300,000
 $(1,276) 3.875% December 2023
 250,000
 245,425
 250,000
 244,829
Senior notes 3.875% December 2023
 250,000
 (3,378) 250,000
 (3,732) 3.750% December 2024
 250,000
 247,058
 250,000
 246,717
Senior notes 3.750% December 2024
 250,000
 (1,298) 250,000
 (1,418) 3.125% September 2026
 350,000
 344,600
 
 
                        
Mortgages payable:      ��                 
Atlantic City (1)
 5.14%-7.65%
 November 2021- December 2026
 43,312
 3,293
 45,997
 3,694
Atlantic City (2) (3)
 5.14%-7.65%
 November 2021- December 2026
 40,471
 43,286
 43,312
 46,605
Deer Park LIBOR + 1.50%
 August 2018
 150,000
 (845) 150,000
 (1,161) LIBOR + 1.50%
 
 
 
 150,000
 149,145
Foxwoods LIBOR + 1.65%
 December 2017
 70,250
 
 25,235
 
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 December 2017
 70,250
 69,902
 70,250
 69,564
Hershey (1)
 5.17%-8.00%
 
 
 
 29,271
 399
Ocean City (1)
 5.24% 
 
 
 17,827
 99
Southaven LIBOR + 1.75%
 April 2018
 45,824
 
 
 
 LIBOR + 1.75%
 April 2018
 59,277
 58,957
 45,824
 45,273
Note payable (1)
 1.50% June 2016
 10,000
 (81) 10,000
 (241)
Unsecured note payable (2)
 1.50% June 2016
 
 
 10,000
 9,919
Unsecured term loan LIBOR + 1.05%
 February 2019
 250,000
 
 250,000
 
 LIBOR + 0.95%
 April 2021
 325,000
 322,410
 250,000
 248,443
Unsecured term note LIBOR + 1.30%
 August 2017
 7,500
 
 7,500
 
 LIBOR + 1.30%
 
 
 
 7,500
 7,470
Unsecured lines of credit LIBOR + 0.90%
 October 2019
 190,300
 
 111,000
 
 LIBOR + .90% October 2019
 61,000
 58,002
 190,300
 186,220
     $1,567,186
 $(3,380) $1,446,830
 $(3,636)     $1,705,998
 $1,687,866
 $1,567,186
 $1,551,924
(1)Includes premiums and net of debt discount and unamortized debt origination costs. Unamortized debt origination costs were 14.0 million and $11.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Amortization of deferred debt origination costs included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $3.2 million, $2.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
(2)The effective interest rates assigned during the purchase price allocation to these assumed mortgages and note payable during acquisitions in 2011 were as follows: Atlantic City 5.05%, Ocean City 4.68%, Hershey 3.40% and note payable 3.15%.
(3)Principal and interest due monthly with remaining principal due at maturity.

Certain of our properties, which had a net book value of approximately $622.8$327.7 million at December 31, 2015,2016, serve as collateral for mortgages payable. We maintain unsecured lines of credit that provide for borrowings of up to $520.0 million. The unsecured lines of credit include a $20.0 million liquidity line and a $500.0 million syndicated line. The syndicated line may be increased to$1.0up to $1.0 billion through an accordion feature in certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2016, letters of credit totaling approximately $5.4 million were issued under the lines of credit.




F-35F-37





We provide guarantees to lenders for our joint ventures which include standard non-recourse carve out indemnifications for losses arising from items such as but not limited to fraud, physical waste, payment of taxes, environmental indemnities, misapplication of insurance proceeds or security deposits and failure to maintain required insurance. For construction and term loans, we may include a guaranty of completion as well as a principal guaranty ranging from 5% to 100% of principal.  The principal guarantees include terms for release based upon satisfactory completion of construction and performance targets including occupancy thresholds and minimum debt service coverage tests.

The unsecured lines of credit and senior unsecured notes include covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage and leverage, and limit the payment of dividends such that dividends and distributions will not exceed funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95% of funds from operations on a cumulative basis. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.

2016 Transactions

Deer Park Debt Repayment

In January 2016, we repaid our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which had an original maturity date in August 2018 and was related to our 749,000 square foot Deer Park outlet center.

Unsecured Term Note Repayment

In February 2016, we repaid our $7.5 million unsecured term note, which had an original maturity date in August 2017.

Unsecured Term Loan

In April 2016, we amended our unsecured term loan to increase the size of the loan from $250.0 million to $325.0 million, extend the maturity date from February 2019 to April 2021, reduce the interest rate spread over LIBOR from 1.05% to 0.95%, and increase the incremental loan availability through an accordion feature from $150.0 million to $175.0 million.

Unsecured Note Payable Repayment

In June 2016, our $10.0 million unsecured note payable became due and was repaid on June 23, 2016.

Aggregate $350.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes due 2026 and Westgate Debt Repayment

In August 2016, we completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2026 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 99.605% of the principal amount to yield 3.171% to maturity. In October 2016, we sold an additional $100.0 million of our senior notes due 2026. The notes priced at 98.962% of the principal amount to yield 3.248% to maturity. The notes pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.125% per annum and mature on September 1, 2026. The aggregate net proceeds from the offerings, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $344.5 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay a $62.0 million floating rate mortgage loan related to the outlet center in Glendale (Westgate), Arizona, repay borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit, and for general corporate purposes.

Savannah Debt Repayment

At the time of acquisition, the Savannah outlet center was subject to a $96.9 million mortgage loan, with an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65% and maturity date in May 2017. In September 2016, we repaid the mortgage loan with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.

2015 Transactions

Southaven Mortgage

In April 2015, the consolidated joint venture closed on aan interest only mortgage loan with the ability to borrow up to $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR +1.75%. The loan initially matures on April 29, 2018, with one two-year extension option.


F-38




Hershey Mortgage

In May 2015, we repaid the mortgages associated with our Hershey outlet center, which were assumed as part of the acquisition of the property in 2011. The maturity date of the mortgages was August 1, 2015 and it had a principal balance at the date of extinguishment of $29.0 million.

Ocean City Mortgage

In July 2015, we repaid the mortgage associated with our Ocean City outlet center, which was assumed as part of the acquisition of the property in 2011. The maturity date of the mortgage was January 6, 2016 and had a principal balance at the date of extinguishment of $17.6 million.

Extension of Unsecured Lines of Credit

In October 2015, we closed on amendments to our unsecured lines of credit, extending the maturity and reducing our interest rate. The maturity date of these facilities was extended from October 2017 to October 2019 with the ability to further extend the maturity date for an additional year at our option. The interest rate was reduced from LIBOR + 1.00% to LIBOR + 0.90% based on our current credit rating and the maximum borrowings to which the syndicated line could be increased through an accordion feature in certain circumstances was increased from $750.0 million to $1.0 billion. Loan origination costs associated with the amendments totaled approximately $2.0 million.

2014 Transactions

Amendment of $250.0 Million Unsecured Term Loan

In July 2014, we entered into an amendment of our $250.0 million unsecured term loan which, maturesat the time, was scheduled to mature in February 2019. The amendment reduced the interest rate on the loan from LIBOR + 1.60% to LIBOR + 1.05%. No other material terms of the loan were amended.


F-36



$250.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes

In November 2014, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2024 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 99.429% of the principal amount to yield 3.819% to maturity. The notes will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.750% per annum and mature on December 1, 2024. The net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $246.2 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to redeem our $250.0 million 6.15% senior notes due November 2015. We recorded a charge of approximately $13.1 million for the make-whole premium related to the early redemption, which was completed in December 2014.

Foxwoods Mortgage

In December 2014, the consolidated joint venture closed on aan interest only mortgage loan with the ability to borrow up to $70.3 million at an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. In November 2016, the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR +1.55%due to us reaching our debt service coverage ratio. The loan initially matures in December 2017, with two one-year extension options.

2013 Transactions
F-39

Assumption of $150.0 Million Deer Park Mortgage

In August 2013, as part of the acquisition of a controlling ownership interest in Deer Park, we assumed an $150.0 million interest only mortgage loan, including a fair value discount of $1.6 million. The loan has a five year term and carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.50%.

Derivatives

In October 2013, to reduce our floating rate debt exposure, we entered into interest rate swap agreements on notional amounts totaling $150.0 millionthat fixed the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.30% from November 2013 to August 2016.

Extension of Unsecured Lines of Credit

In October 2013, we amended our unsecured lines of credit, extending the maturity, and reducing the overall borrowing costs. The maturity of these facilities was extended from November 10, 2015 to October 24, 2017 with the ability to further extend the maturity for an additional year at our option. The annual commitment fee, which is payable on the full $520.0 million in loan commitments, was reduced from 0.175% to 0.15%, and the interest rate spread over LIBOR was reduced from 1.10% to 1.00% based on our current credit rating. Loan origination costs associated with the amendments totaled approximately $1.5 million. The lines of credit were further amended in October 2015 as discussed above.

$250.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes

In November 2013, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership completed a public offering of $250.0 million in senior notes due 2023 in an underwritten public offering. The notes were priced at 98.360% of the principal amount to yield 4.076% to maturity. The notes will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.875% per annum and mature on December 1, 2023. The net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $243.6 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit.


F-37



Debt Maturities

Maturities of the existing long-term debt as of December 31, 20152016 for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Calendar Year Amount Amount
2016 $12,842
2017 80,758
 $73,258
2018 199,008
 62,460
2019 443,669
 64,369
2020 303,566
 303,566
2021 330,793
Thereafter 527,343
 871,552
Subtotal 1,567,186
 1,705,998
Net discount (3,380)
Net discount and debt origination costs (18,132)
Total $1,563,806
 $1,687,866

10. Deferred Financing Obligation

In September 2015, the noncontrolling interest in our outlet center in Deer Park, New York exercised its right to require us to acquire their ownership interest in the property for $28.4 million. We closed on the transaction in January 2016 and repaid the deferred financing obligation, which was recorded in the other liabilities section of our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.

11.    Derivative Financial Instruments

The following table summarizes the terms and fair values of our derivative financial instruments, as well as their classifications within the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20152016 and December 31, 20142015 (notional amounts and fair values in thousands):
         Fair Value     Fair Value
Effective Date Maturity Date Notional Amount Bank Pay Rate Company Fixed Pay Rate 2015 2014 Maturity Date Notional Amount Bank Pay Rate Company Fixed Pay Rate 2016 2015
Assets (Liabilities):        
Assets (Liabilities)(1):
        
November 14, 2013 August 14, 2018 $50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.3075% $(212) $26
 August 14, 2018 $50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.3075% $(119) $(212)
November 14, 2013 August 14, 2018 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.2970% (198) 40
 August 14, 2018 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.2970% (110) (198)
November 14, 2013 August 14, 2018 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.3025% (206) 29
 August 14, 2018 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.3025% (115) (206)
April 13, 2016 January 1, 2021 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.0390% 1,227
 
April 13, 2016 January 1, 2021 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.0395% 1,226
 
April 13, 2016 January 1, 2021 50,000
 1 month LIBOR 1.0400% 1,222
 
April 13, 2016 January 1, 2021 25,000
 1 month LIBOR 0.9915% 662
 
Total   $150,000
     $(616) $95
   $325,000
     $3,993
 $(616)
(1)Net asset balances are recorded in prepaids and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and net liabilities are recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

In April 2016, we entered into four separate interest rate swap agreements, effective April 13, 2016 that fix the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.03% on notional amounts totaling $175.0 million through January 1, 2021.

The derivative financial instruments are comprised of interest rate swaps, which are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, each with a separate counterparty. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and currently do not have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges.


F-40




The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative, if any,significant, is recognized directly in earnings. For the year endended December 31, 2015,2016, the ineffective portion was not significant.


F-38



The following table represents the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013,2014, respectively (in thousands):
 Location of Reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Into Income    
 December 31,  
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Interest Rate Swaps (Effective Portion):            
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivative $(711) $(1,287) $1,382
 $4,609
 $(711) $(2,028)
      
Treasury Rate Lock (Effective Portion):      
Amount of gain reclassified from accumulated OCI into income Interest Expense $
 $741
 $371

In 2005, we settled two US treasury rate lock agreements associated with a 10 year senior, unsecured bond offering and received approximately $3.2 million. The unamortized balance of the settled agreements as of December 31, 2013 was $741,000. We fully amortized the remaining balance during 2014 in connection with the early redemption of the associated 10 year senior, unsecured notes in December 2014.

11.12.    Fair Value Measurements

Fair value guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are defined as follows:

Tier Description
Level 1 Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable
Level 3 Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions

The following table sets forth our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities Significant Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs
  Total   
Fair value as of December 31, 2015:        
Assets:        
Interest rate swaps (other liabilities) $(616) $
 $(616) $
Total liabilities $(616) $
 $(616) $
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities Significant Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs
  Total   
Fair value as of December 31, 2016:        
Asset:        
Interest rate swaps (prepaids and other assets) $3,993
 $
 $3,993
 $
Total assets $3,993
 $
 $3,993
 $




F-39F-41




    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities Significant Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs
  Total   
Fair value as of December 31, 2014:        
Assets:        
Interest rate swaps (prepaids and other assets) $95
 $
 $95
 $
Total assets $95
 $
 $95
 $
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities Significant Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs
  Total   
Fair value as of December 31, 2015:        
Liability:        
Interest rate swaps (other liabilities) $(616) $
 $(616) $
Total liabilities $(616) $
 $(616) $

The estimated fair value and recorded value of our debt consistingas of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, secured mortgagesDecember 31, 2016 and unsecured lines of credit2015 were as follows (in thousands):
 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 2016 2015
Fair value of debt $1,615,833
 $1,493,519
Level 1 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities $
 $
Level 2 Significant Observable Inputs 1,137,976
 836,361
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs 566,668
 779,472
Total fair value of debt $1,704,644
 $1,615,833
    
Recorded value of debt $1,563,806
 $1,443,194
 $1,687,866
 $1,551,924

With the exception of the unsecured term loan and unsecured lines of credit, that have variable rates and considered at market value, fair values of the senior notes and mortgage loans are determined using discounted cash flow analysis with an interest rate or credit spread similar to that of current market borrowing arrangements. Because the Company'sOur senior unsecured notes are publicly traded withpublicly-traded which provides quoted market rates. However, due to the limited trading volume of these notes, we have classified these instruments are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy. In contrast, mortgage loans areOur other debt is classified as Level 3 given the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation. Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimatedOur unsecured term loan, unsecured lines of credit and variable interest rate mortgages are all LIBOR based instruments. When selecting the discount rates for purposes of estimating the fair value of these instruments, we evaluated the original credit spreads and do not believe that the use of them differs materially from current credit spreads for similar instruments and therefore the recorded values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on the disposition of the financial instruments.these debt instruments is considered their fair value.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other assets and liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments.

12.13.    Shareholders' Equity of the Company

EachAs discussed in Note 14, each Class A common limited partnership unit is exchangeable for one common share of the Company.

2015 Transactions

For The following table sets forth the year ended December 31, 2015, 25,663number of Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership were exchanged for an equal number of common shares offor the Company.

2014 Transactions

For the yearyears ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, Non-Company LPs exchanged a total of 66,606 Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership for an equal number of common shares of the Company.(in units):
  2016 2015 2014
Exchange of Class A limited partnership units 24,962
 25,663
 66,606

2013 Transactions
F-42




For the year ended December 31, 2013, Non-Company LPs exchanged a total of 67,428 Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership for an equal number of common shares of the Company.



F-40



13.14.    Partners' Equity of the Operating Partnership

In August 2013, the Operating Partnership's operating agreement was amended to, among other things, effect a four-for-one split of the outstanding partnership units. After the effect of the split, each Class A common limited partnership unit held by Non-Company LPs may be exchanged for one common share of the Company. Prior to the split, each unit held by the Non-Company LPs was exchangeable for four common shares of the Company. All references to the number of units outstanding and per unit amounts reflect the effect of the split for all periods presented.

All units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership have equal rights with respect to earnings, dividends and net assets. When the Company issues common shares upon the exercise of options, the issuance of restricted share awards or the exchange of Class A common limited partnership units, the Operating Partnership issues a corresponding Class B common limited partnership unit to Tanger LP trust, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Also, in August 2013 as disclosed in Note 3, the Operating Partnership issued 450,576 Class A common limited partnership units as partial consideration for the acquisition of an additional one-third interest in Deer Park.

The following table sets forth the changes in outstanding partnership units for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013:2014:
   Limited Partnership Units   Limited Partnership Units
 General partnership units Class A Class B Total General partnership units Class A Class B Total
Balance December 31, 2012 1,000,000
 4,761,864
 93,061,384
 97,823,248
Exchange of Class A limited partnership units 
 (67,428) 67,428
 
Issuance of restricted units 
 
 332,373
 332,373
Units issued upon exercise of options 
 
 44,500
 44,500
Units issued as consideration for business acquisition (see Note 3) 
 450,576
 
 450,576
Balance December 31, 2013 1,000,000
 5,145,012
 93,505,685
 98,650,697
 1,000,000
 5,145,012
 93,505,685
 98,650,697
Units withheld for employee income taxes 
 
 (412,239) (412,239) 
 
 (412,239) (412,239)
Exchange of Class A limited partnership units 
 (66,606) 66,606
 
 
 (66,606) 66,606
 
Issuance of restricted units 
 
 1,302,729
 1,302,729
Grant of restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures 
 
 1,302,729
 1,302,729
Units issued upon exercise of options 
 
 47,000
 47,000
 
 
 47,000
 47,000
Balance December 31, 2014 1,000,000
 5,078,406
 94,509,781
 99,588,187
 1,000,000
 5,078,406
 94,509,781
 99,588,187
Units withheld for employee income taxes 
 
 (31,863) (31,863) 
 
 (31,863) (31,863)
Exchange of Class A limited partnership units 
 (25,663) 25,663
 
 
 (25,663) 25,663
 
Issuance of restricted units 
 
 348,844
 348,844
Grant of restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures 
 
 348,844
 348,844
Units issued upon exercise of options 
 
 28,400
 28,400
 
 
 28,400
 28,400
Balance December 31, 2015 1,000,000
 5,052,743
 94,880,825
 99,933,568
 1,000,000
 5,052,743
 94,880,825
 99,933,568
Units withheld for employee income taxes 
 
 (66,760) (66,760)
Exchange of Class A limited partnership units 
 (24,962) 24,962
 
Grant of restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures 
 
 173,124
 173,124
Issuance of deferred units 
 
 24,040
 24,040
Units issued upon exercise of options 
 
 59,700
 59,700
Balance December 31, 2016 1,000,000
 5,027,781
 95,095,891
 100,123,672



F-43


F-41



14.
15.    Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership relate to the interests in the Operating Partnership owned by Non-Company LPs as discussed in Note 2. The noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships consist of outside equity interests in partnerships not wholly owned by the Company or the Operating Partnership that are consolidated with the financial results of the Company and Operating Partnership because the Operating Partnership exercises control over the entities that own the properties.

In 20152016 and 2014,2015, adjustments of the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership were made as a result of the changes in the Company's ownership of the Operating Partnership from additional units received in connection with the Company's issuance of common shares upon the exercise of options and grants of share-based compensation awards, and additional units received upon the exchange of Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership into an equal number of common shares of the Company. As discussed in Note 12,13, for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 20142015, Non-Company LPs exchanged 25,66324,962 and 66,60625,663 Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership, respectively, for an equal number of common shares of the Company.

The changes in the Company's ownership interests in the subsidiaries impacted consolidated equity during the periods shown as follows (in thousands):
 2015 2014 2016 2015
Net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. $211,200
 $74,011
 $193,744
 $211,200
Increase (decreases) in Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. paid-in-capital adjustments to noncontrolling interests (1)
 (402) 741
Decrease in Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. paid-in-capital adjustments to noncontrolling interests (389) (402)
Changes from net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and transfers from noncontrolling interest $210,798
 $74,752
 $193,355
 $210,798




F-42F-44




15.16.    Earnings Per Share of the Company

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in computing earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Numerator            
Net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. $211,200
 $74,011
 $107,557
 $193,744
 $211,200
 $74,011
Less allocation of earnings to participating securities (2,408) (1,872) (1,126) (1,926) (2,408) (1,872)
Net income available to common shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. $208,792
 $72,139
 $106,431
 $191,818
 $208,792
 $72,139
Denominator            
Basic weighted average common shares 94,698
 93,769
 93,311
 95,102
 94,698
 93,769
Effect of notional units 
 
 849
 175
 
 
Effect of outstanding options and certain restricted common shares 61
 70
 87
 68
 61
 70
Diluted weighted average common shares 94,759
 93,839
 94,247
 95,345
 94,759
 93,839
      
Basic earnings per common share:            
Net income $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $2.02
 $2.20
 $0.77
      
Diluted earnings per common share:            
Net income $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $2.01
 $2.20
 $0.77

We determine diluted earnings per share based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average shares that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common shares at the earliest date possible.

The notional units are considered contingently issuable common shares and are included in earnings per share if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method.method and the common shares would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, 501,446, 859,450 and 644,850 units were excluded from the computation, respectively, because these units would not have been issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. Notional units granted in 2010 were converted into 933,769 restricted common shares in January 2014. The restricted common shares vested on December 31, 2014 and were considered participating securities through the vesting date.

The computationeffect of diluted earnings per share excludes options to purchasedilutive common shares whenis determined using the treasury stock method whereby outstanding options are assumed exercised at the beginning of the reporting period and the exercise price is greater thanproceeds from such options and the average measured but unrecognized compensation cost during the period are assumed to be used to repurchase our common shares at the average market price of the common shares forduring the period. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 141,300, 227,400 options and 259,000 options were excluded from the computation, respectively. Thererespectively, as they were no options excluded from the computation for the year ended December 31, 2013.anti-dilutive. The assumed exchange of the partnership units held by the Non-Company LPs as of the beginning of the year, which would result in the elimination of earnings allocated to the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership, would have no impact on earnings per share since the allocation of earnings to a common limited partnership unit, as if exchanged, is equivalent to earnings allocated to a common share.

Certain of the Company's unvested restricted common share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. The impact of these unvested restricted common share awards on earnings per share has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted common share awards based on dividends declared and the unvested restricted common shares' participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted common shares that do not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are included in the diluted earnings per share computation if the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method.



F-43F-45




16.17.    Earnings Per Unit of the Operating Partnership

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in computing earnings per unit for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 (in thousands, except per unit amounts). Note that all per unit amounts reflect a four-for-one split of the Operating Partnership's units in August 2013::
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Numerator            
Net income attributable to partners of the Operating Partnership $222,531
 $78,048
 $113,200
 $204,031
 $222,531
 $78,048
Allocation of earnings to participating securities (2,413) (1,873) (1,129) (1,928) (2,413) (1,873)
Net income available to common unitholders of the Operating Partnership $220,118
 $76,175
 $112,071
 $202,103
 $220,118
 $76,175
Denominator            
Basic weighted average common units 99,777
 98,883
 98,193
 100,155
 99,777
 98,883
Effect of notional units 
 
 849
 175
 
 
Effect of outstanding options and certain restricted common units 61
 70
 87
 68
 61
 70
Diluted weighted average common units 99,838
 98,953
 99,129
 100,398
 99,838
 98,953
      
Basic earnings per common unit:            
Net income $2.21
 $0.77
 $1.14
 $2.02
 $2.21
 $0.77
      
Diluted earnings per common unit:            
Net income $2.20
 $0.77
 $1.13
 $2.01
 $2.20
 $0.77

We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common units at the earliest date possible.

The notional units are considered contingently issuable common units and are included in earnings per unit if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method and the common shares would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 501,446, 859,450 and 644,850 units were excluded from the computation, respectively, because these units would not have been issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. The notional units are considered contingently issuable common units and are included in earnings per unit if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method. Notional units granted in 2010 were converted into 933,769 restricted common units in January 2014. The restricted common units vested on December 31, 2014 and were considered participating securities through the vesting date.

The computationeffect of diluted earnings per unit excludes options to purchasedilutive common units whenis determined using the treasury stock method, whereby outstanding options are assumed exercised at the beginning of the reporting period and the exercise price is greater thanproceeds from such options and the average measured but unrecognized compensation cost during the period are assumed to be used to repurchase our common units at the average market price of the common units forduring the period. The market price of a common unit is considered to be equivalent to the market price of a Company common share. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 141,300, 227,400 options and 259,000 options were excluded from the computation, respectively. There were no options excluded from the computation for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Certain of the Company's unvested restricted common share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to distributions or distribution equivalents. The impact of the corresponding unvested restricted unit awards on earnings per unit has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted unit awards based on distributions declared and the unvested restricted units' participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted common units that do not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are included in the diluted earnings per unit computation if the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method.



F-44F-46




17.18.    Equity-Based Compensation

When a common share is issued by the Company, the Operating Partnership issues one corresponding unit of partnership interest to the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries. Therefore, when the Company grants an equity based award, the Operating Partnership treats each award as having been granted by the Operating Partnership. In the discussion below, the term "we" refers to the Company and the Operating Partnership together and the term "shares" is meant to also include corresponding units of the Operating Partnership.

We may issue up to 15.4 million common shares under the Plan. Through December 31, 2015,2016, we had granted 7,560,2607,543,760 options, net of options forfeited; 4,898,7085,014,072 restricted common share awards, net of restricted common shares forfeited or withheld for employees' tax obligations; and notional units which may result in the issuance of a maximum of 636,300759,176 common shares. Shares remaining available for future issuance totaled 2,304,7322,082,992 common shares. The amount and terms of the awards granted under the Plan were determined by the Board of Directors (or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors).

We recorded share basedequity-based compensation expense in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013,2014, respectively, as follows (in thousands):
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Restricted common shares $11,220
 $9,978
 $8,354
 $10,976
 $11,220
 $9,978
Notional unit performance awards 3,030
 4,313
 2,847
 3,967
 3,030
 4,313
Options 462
 459
 175
 376
 462
 459
Total share based compensation $14,712
 $14,750
 $11,376
Total equity-based compensation $15,319
 $14,712
 $14,750

Share-basedEquity-based compensation expense capitalized as a part of rental property and deferred lease costs during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $837,000, $709,000 and $367,000, respectively.were as follows (in thousands):
  2016 2015 2014
Equity-based compensation expense capitalized $985
 $837
 $709

As of December 31, 2015,2016, there was $28.2$25.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested common equity-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.82.0 years.

Restricted Common Share Awards

During 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013,2014, the Company granted 286,524, 357,844 373,960 and 349,373373,960 restricted common shares, respectively, to the independent directors and the senior executive officers. The independent directors' restricted common shares vest ratably over a three year period and the senior executive officers' restricted common shares vest ratably over a four or five year period. For the restricted shares issued to our chief executive officer during 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013,2014, the restricted share agreement requiresagreements require him to hold the shares for a minimum of three years following each applicable vesting date thereof. Compensation expense related to the amortization of the deferred compensation is being recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule of the restricted shares. For all of the restricted common share awards described above, the grant date fair value of the award was determined based upon the closing market price of the Company's common shares on the day prior to the grant date and the associated compensation expense is being recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule of each grant.

F-45F-47





The following table summarizes information related to unvested restricted common shares outstanding as offor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,: and 2014:
Unvested Restricted Common Shares Number of shares Weighted average grant date fair value Number of shares Weighted average grant date fair value
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 1,099,450
 $29.01
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 1,057,966
 $26.91
Granted(1) 357,844
 36.69
 1,307,729
 26.50
Vested (371,299) 28.12
 (1,266,245) 24.67
Forfeited 
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 1,099,450
 $29.01
Granted 357,844
 36.69
Vested (371,299) 28.12
Forfeited 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 1,085,995
 $31.84
 1,085,995
 $31.84
Granted 286,524
 29.64
Vested (388,851) 31.30
Forfeited (104,400) 34.13
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 879,268
 $31.09
(1)Includes 933,769 shares granted under the 2010 Multi Year Performance Plan.

The total value of restricted common shares vested during the years ended 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $12.7 million, $13.1 million $46.6 million and $10.9$46.6 million, respectively. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we withheld shares with value equivalent to the employees' minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes, and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total number of shares withheld were 66,760, 31,863 andand 412,239 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and were based on the value of the restricted common shares on the vesting date as determined by our closing share price on the day prior to the vesting date. No shares were withheld during 2013. Total amounts paid for the employees' tax obligation to taxing authorities were $2.2 million, $1.1 million and $15.5 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which is reflected as a financing activity within the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Notional Unit Performance Awards

2015 Outperformance Plan

In February 2015Every year since 2013, the Compensation Committee of the CompanyTanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. approved the general terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2015 Outperformance Plan (the “2015 OPP"“OPP"). The 2015 OPP is a long-term incentive long-term performance based incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipientsplan. Recipients may earn upunits which may convert, subject to an aggregatethe achievement of 306,600the goals described below, into restricted common shares of the Company based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) and its share price appreciation relative to its peer group over a three yearthree-year measurement period. The measurement period for the 2015 OPP is January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.

Any shares earned at the end of the three yearthree-year measurement period are subject to a time based vesting schedule, with 50% of the shares vesting in the January immediately following the measurement period, and the remaining 50% vesting in January one year thereafter, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting dates (unless terminated prior thereto (a) by the Company without cause, (b) by participant for good reason or (c) due to death or disability.

The maximum number of shares will be earned under this plan if the Company both (a) achieves 35% or higher share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid, over the respective three-year measurement periods and (b) is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the respective three-year measurement period. The maximum value of the awards that could be earned on December 31, 2017, if the Company achieves or exceeds the 35% share price appreciation and is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the applicable three-year measurement period, will equal approximately $14.5 million.
F-48

With respect to 60% of the performance shares, 33.33% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 25% over the three-year measurement period, 66.67% of the award will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 30%, and 100% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 35% or higher.


F-46



With respect to 40% of the performance shares, 33.33% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 50th percentile of its peer group over the three-year measurement period, 66.67% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 60th percentile of its peer group during this period, and 100% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 70th percentile of its peer group or greater during this period. The peer group is based on companies included in the SNL Equity REIT index.

The following table sets forth OPP performance shares for the 2015 OPP will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute share price appreciationtargets and for relative share price appreciation amongst the Company's peer group. The share price targets will be reduced on a penny-for-pennyother relevant information about each plan:
  2016 OPP 2015 OPP 
2014 OPP(1)
 
2013 OPP (2)
Performance targets (3)
        
Absolute portion of award:        
Percent of total award 50% 60% 70% 70%
Absolute share price appreciation range 18% - 35% 25% - 35% 25% - 35% 25% - 35%
Percentage of units to be earned 20%-100% 33%-100% 33%-100% 33%-100%
         
Relative portion of award:        
Percent of total award 50% 40% 30% 30%
Percentile rank of peer group range(4)
 40th - 70th 50th - 70th 50th - 70th 50th - 70th
Percentage of units to be earned 20%-100% 33%-100% 33%-100% 33%-100%
         
Maximum number of restricted common shares that may be earned 321,900
 306,600
 329,700
 315,150
Grant date fair value per share $15.10
 $15.85
 $14.71
 $13.99
(1)
On December 31, 2016, the measurement period for the 2014 OPP expired. Based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) over the three year measurement period, we issued 184,455 restricted common shares in January 2017, with 94,663 vesting immediately and the remaining 89,792 vesting in January one year thereafter, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting date (unless terminated prior thereto (a) by the Company without cause, (b) by participant for good reason or (c) due to death or disability). Our relative total shareholder return for the 2014 OPP did not meet the minimum share price appreciation and no shares were earned under this component of the 2014 OPP.
(2)On December 31, 2015, the measurement period for the 2013 OPP expired and neither of the Company’s absolute nor relative total shareholder returns were sufficient for employees to earn, and therefore become eligible to vest in, any restricted shares under the plan. Accordingly, all 2013 OPP performance awards were automatically forfeited.
(3)The performance shares for the OPP will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute share price appreciation and for relative share price appreciation amongst the Company's peer group. The share price targets will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period.
(4)The peer group is based on companies included in the SNL Equity REIT index.

The fair values of the OPP awards granted during the measurement period. The compensation expense is amortized usingyears ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 were determined at the graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period. The fair value of the awards are calculatedgrant dates using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.model and the following assumptions:
  2016 2015 2014
Risk free interest rate (1)
 1.05% 0.86% 0.67%
Expected dividend yield (2)
 3.1% 2.7% 2.8%
Expected volatility (3)
 21% 20% 27%
(1)Represents the interest rate as of the grant date on US treasury bonds having the same life as the estimated life of the restricted unit grants.
(2)The dividend yield is calculated utilizing the dividends paid for the previous five-year period.
(3)Based on a mix of historical and implied volatility for our common shares and the common shares of our peer index companies over the measurement period.


2014 and 2013 Outperformance Plans
F-49

In February 2014 and 2013, the Compensation Committee of the Company approved the general terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2014 Outperformance Plan (the “2014 OPP") and the 2013 Outperformance Plan (the “2013 OPP"). The 2014 OPP and 2013 OPP are long-term performance based incentive compensation plans pursuant to which award recipients may earn up to an aggregate of 329,700 and 315,150 restricted common shares, respectively, of the Company based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) and its share price appreciation relative to its peer group over a three year measurement period. The measurement period for the 2014 OPP is January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 and for the 2013 OPP is January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015.

Any shares earned at the end of the three year measurement period are subject to a time based vesting schedule, with 50% of the shares vesting in the January immediately following the measurement period, and the remaining 50% vesting in January one year thereafter, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting dates (unless terminated prior thereto (a) by the Company without cause, (b) by participant for good reason or (c) due to death or disability.

The maximum number of shares will be earned under these plans if the Company both (a) achieves 35% or higher share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid, over the respective three-year measurement periods and (b) is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the respective three-year measurement periods. The maximum value of the awards that could be earned on December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016, if the Company achieves or exceeds the 35% share price appreciation and is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the applicable three-year measurement period, will equal approximately $13.3 million and $14.3 million, respectively.

With respect to 70% of the performance shares, 33.33%of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 25% over the three-year measurement period, 66.67% of the award will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 30%, and 100% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 35% or higher.

With respect to 30% of the performance shares, 33.33% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 50th percentile of its peer group over the three-year measurement period, 66.67% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 60th percentile of its peer group during this period, and 100% of this portion of the award will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 70th percentile of its peer group or greater during this period. The peer group is based on companies included in the SNL Equity REIT index.


F-47



The performance sharesfollowing table sets forth OPP activity for the 2014 OPP and 2013 OPP will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute share price appreciation and for relative share price appreciation amongst the Company's peer group. The share price targets will be reduced on a penny-for-penny basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period. The compensation expense is amortized using the graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period. The fair value of the awards are calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.

Onyears ended December 31, 2016, 2015, the measurement period for the 2013 OPP expired and neither of the Company’s absolute nor relative total shareholder returns were sufficient for employees to earn, and therefore become eligible to vest in, any restricted shares under the plan. Accordingly, all 2013 OPP performance awards were automatically forfeited.2014:
Unvested OPP Awards (1)
 Number of units Weighted average grant date fair value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 315,150
 $13.99
Awarded 329,700
 14.71
Forfeited 
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 644,850
 $14.36
Awarded 306,600
 15.85
Forfeited (407,150) 14.28
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 544,300
 $15.26
Awarded 321,900
 15.10
Forfeited (107,024) 14.77
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 759,176
 $15.36
(1)Excludes the 2010 Multi Year Performance Plan that had a four year measurement period.

2010 Multi Year Performance Plan

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company's Compensation Committee approved the general terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2010 Multi-Year Performance Plan, (the "2010 Multi Year Performance Plan"). Under the 2010 Multi-Year Performance Plan, we granted 392,000 notional units, net of notional units forfeited, to award recipients as a group, which would convert into restricted common shares on a one-for one basis, one-for two basis, or one-for-three basis depending upon the amount by which the Company's common shares appreciated above a minimum level over a four year performance period ending December 31, 2013, not to exceed a total value of approximately $32.2 million. Based on the Company's performance over the four year measurement period, we issued 933,769 restricted common shares in January 2014 which vested on December 31, 2014 contingent on continued employment through the vesting date. The fair value of the awards were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.

Option Awards

In February 2014, the Company granted 282,500 options to non-executive employees of the Company. The exercise price of the options granted during the first quarter of 2014 was $32.02 which equaled the closing market price of the Company's common shares on the day prior to the grant date. The options expire 10 years from the date of grant and 20% of the options become exercisable in each of the first five years commencing one year from the date of grant. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: expected dividend yield 2.8%; expected life of 7 years; expected volatility of 32%; a risk-free rate of 2.46%; and forfeiture rates of 3.0% to 13.5% dependent upon the employee's position within the Company.

Options outstanding at December 31, 20152016 had the following weighted average exercise prices and weighted average remaining contractual lives:
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Exercise pricesExercise prices Options Weighted average exercise price Weighted remaining contractual life in years Options Weighted average exercise priceExercise prices Options Weighted average exercise price Weighted remaining contractual life in years Options Weighted average exercise price
$26.06
 91,000
 $26.06
 5.16 62,500
 $26.06
26.06
 63,200
 $26.06
 4.15 63,200
 $26.06
32.0232.02
 227,400
 32.02
 8.01 42,200
 32.02
32.02
 179,000
 32.02
 7.00 52,400
 32.02
 318,400
 $30.32
 7.19 104,700
 $28.46
 242,200
 $30.46
 6.26 115,600
 $28.76


F-48F-50




A summary of option activity under the Plan as offor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and changes during the year then ended is presented below2014 (aggregate intrinsic value amount in thousands):
Options Shares Weighted-average exercise price Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years Aggregate intrinsic value Shares Weighted-average exercise price Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years Aggregate intrinsic value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 166,300
 24.13
    
Granted 282,500
 32.02
  
Exercised (47,000) 19.22
  
Forfeited (31,300) 31.11
  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 370,500
 $30.20
     370,500
 $30.20
 8.12 $2,759
Granted 
 
   
 
  
Exercised (28,400) 27.76
   (28,400) 27.76
  
Forfeited (23,700) 31.58
     (23,700) $31.58
  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 318,400
 $30.32
 7.19 $924
 318,400
 $30.32
 7.19 $924
Granted 
 
  
Exercised (59,700) 29.31
  
Forfeited (16,500) 31.86
    
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 242,200
 $30.46
 6.26 $1,287
            
Vested and Expected to Vest as of            
December 31, 2015 258,633
 $30.13
 7.10 $800
December 31, 2016 231,064
 $30.39
 6.22 $1,245
            
Exercisable as of December 31, 2015 104,700
 $28.46
 6.31 $498
Exercisable as of December 31, 2016 115,600
 $28.76
 5.44 $811

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $469,000, $200,000 and 2013 was $200,000, $724,000, and $905,000, respectively.

401(k) Retirement Savings Plan

We have a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment criteria. An employee may invest pretax earnings in the 401(k) plan up to the maximum legal limits (as defined by Federal regulations). This plan allows participants to defer a portion of their compensation and to receive matching contributions for a portion of the deferred amounts. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we contributed approximately $828,000, $742,000 and $703,000, respectively, to the 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.



F-49F-51




18.19. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Company

The following table presents changes in the balances of each component of accumulated comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 20132014 (in thousands):
  Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss
  Foreign Currency Cash flow hedges Total Foreign Currency Cash flow hedges Total
Balance December 31, 2012 $(5) $1,205
 $1,200
 $
 $(93) $(93)
Amortization of cash flow hedges 
 (353) (353) 
 (18) (18)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation adjustments (4,708) 
 (4,708) (260) 
 (260)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
 1,310
 1,310
 
 
 
Realized loss on foreign currency 123
 
 123
 6
 72
 78
Balance December 31, 2013 (4,590) 2,162
 (2,428) (254) (39) (293)
Amortization of cash flow hedges 
 (852) (852) 
 111
 111
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation adjustments (9,523) 
 (9,523) (519) 
 (519)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
 (1,220) (1,220) 
 (67) (67)
Balance December 31, 2014 (14,113) 90
 (14,023) (773) 5
 (768)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation adjustments (22,017) 
 (22,017) (1,183) 
 (1,183)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
 (675) (675) 
 (36) (36)
Balance December 31, 2015 $(36,130) $(585) $(36,715) $(1,956) $(31) $(1,987)
  Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss
  Foreign currency Cash flow hedges Total Foreign currency Cash flow hedges Total
Balance December 31, 2013 $(4,590) $2,162
 $(2,428) $(254) $(39) $(293)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (9,523) (2,874) (12,397) (519) (158) (677)
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense 
 802
 802
 
 202
 202
Balance December 31, 2014 (14,113) 90
 (14,023) (773) 5
 (768)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (22,017) (2,279) (24,296) (1,183) (122) (1,305)
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense 
 1,604
 1,604
 
 86
 86
Balance December 31, 2015 (36,130) (585) (36,715) (1,956) (31) (1,987)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 4,043
 2,539
 6,582
 216
 135
 351
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense 
 1,838
 1,838
 
 97
 97
Balance December 31, 2016 $(32,087) $3,792
 $(28,295) $(1,740) $201
 $(1,539)

The following representsWe expect within the next twelve months to reclassify into earnings as a decrease to interest expense approximately $1.1 million of the amounts reclassified out ofrecorded within accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings duringrelated to the years endedinterest rate swap agreements in effect and as of December 31, 2015, 2014, and2013 (in thousands):
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Affected Line Item in Statement of Operations
  2015 2014 2013  
Amortization of cash flow hedges $
 $(852) $(353) Interest expense
Realized loss on foreign currency $
 $
 $123
 Interest expense
2016.


F-50F-52




19.20. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Operating Partnership

The following table presents changes in the balances of each component of accumulated comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 20132014 (in thousands):
  Foreign Currency Cash flow hedges Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance December 31, 2012 $(5) $1,112
 $1,107
Amortization of cash flow hedges 
 (371) (371)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation adjustments (4,968) 
 (4,968)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
 1,382
 1,382
Realized loss on foreign currency 129
 
 129
Balance December 31, 2013 (4,844) 2,123
 (2,721)
Amortization of cash flow hedges 
 (741) (741)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation adjustments (10,042) 
 (10,042)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
 (1,287) (1,287)
Balance December 31, 2014 (14,886) 95
 (14,791)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation adjustments (23,200) 
 (23,200)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
 (711) (711)
Balance December 31, 2015 $(38,086) $(616) $(38,702)
  Foreign currency Cash flow hedges Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance December 31, 2013 $(4,844) $2,123
 $(2,721)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (10,042) (3,032) (13,074)
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense 
 1,004
 1,004
Balance December 31, 2014 (14,886) 95
 (14,791)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (23,200) (2,401) (25,601)
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense 
 1,690
 1,690
Balance December 31, 2015 (38,086) (616) (38,702)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 4,259
 2,674
 6,933
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense 
 1,935
 1,935
Balance December 31, 2016 $(33,827) $3,993
 $(29,834)

The following representsWe expect within the next twelve months to reclassify into earnings as a decrease to interest expense approximately $1.1 million of the amounts reclassified out ofrecorded within accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings duringrelated to the years endedinterest rate swap agreements in effect and as of December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (in thousands):
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Affected Line Item in Statement of Operations
  2015 2014 2013  
Amortization of cash flow hedges $
 $(741) $(371) Interest expense
Realized loss on foreign currency 
 
 129
 Interest expense
2016.

20.21.    Supplementary Income Statement Information

The following amounts are included in property operating expenses in income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 (in thousands):
 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Advertising and promotion $29,144
 $25,431
 $24,035
 $29,108
 $29,144
 $25,431
Common area maintenance 68,886
 65,980
 57,693
 70,616
 68,886
 65,980
Real estate taxes 26,168
 25,644
 21,976
 28,542
 26,168
 25,644
Other operating expenses 22,305
 20,367
 17,342
 23,751
 22,305
 20,367
 $146,503
 $137,422
 $121,046
 $152,017
 $146,503
 $137,422


F-51F-53





21.
22.    Lease Agreements

As of December 31, 2015,2016, we were the lessor to over 2,4002,600 stores in our 3436 consolidated outlet centers, under operating leases with initial terms that expire from 20162017 to 2032.2033. Future minimum lease receipts under non-cancellablenon-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2015,2016, excluding the effect of straight-line rent and percentage rentals, are as follows (in thousands):
2016 $264,249
2017 240,284
 $286,805
2018 208,880
 256,564
2019 174,269
 222,617
2020 152,380
 199,932
2021 168,047
Thereafter 453,760
 480,738
 $1,493,822
 $1,614,703

22.23.    Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies of Consolidated Properties

Leases and capital expenditure commitments

Our non-cancelable operating leases, with initial terms in excess of one year, have terms that expire from 20162017 to 2101. Annual rental payments for these leases totaled approximately $7.0 million, $6.4 million $6.0 million and $5.8$6.0 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The majority of our rental payments are related to ground leases at the following outlet centers: Myrtle Beach Hwy 17, Atlantic City, Ocean City, Sevierville, Riverhead , Foxwoods and 2013, respectively. Rehoboth Beach.

Minimum lease payments for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
2016 $5,982
 Operating Leases
2017 5,981
 $6,709
2018 5,667
 6,334
2019 5,716
 6,237
2020 5,720
 6,217
2021 6,258
Thereafter 294,851
 303,509
 $323,917
Total minimum payment $335,264

Commitments to complete construction of our ongoing capital projects and other capital expenditure requirements amounted to approximately $56.0$111.6 million at December 31, 2015. Contractual commitments for ongoing capital projects and other capital expenditure requirements related to our unconsolidated joint ventures amounted to approximately $48.9 million at December 31, 2015, of which our portion was approximately $24.4 million. Contractual commitments represent only those costs subject to contracts which are legal binding agreements as of December 31, 2015 and do not necessary represent the total cost to complete the projects.2016.

Litigation

We are also subject to legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and have not been finally adjudicated. In our opinion, the ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. We record a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We review these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjust the loss provision when appropriate. If a matter is both probable to result in a liability and the amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated, we estimate and disclose the possible loss or range of loss to the extent necessary to make the consolidated financial statements not misleading. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in our consolidated financial statements.



F-52F-54





23.    Subsequent EventsEmployment Agreements

Fort Myers Property SaleWe are party to employment agreements with certain executives that provide for compensation and certain other benefits. The agreements also provide for severance payments under certain circumstances.

Commitments and Contingencies of Unconsolidated Properties

Capital expenditure commitments

Contractual commitments for ongoing capital projects and other capital expenditure requirements related to our unconsolidated joint ventures amounted to approximately $10.2 million at December 31, 2016, of which our portion was approximately $5.1 million. Contractual commitments represent only those costs subject to contracts which are legal binding agreements as of December 31, 2016 and do not necessary represent the total cost to complete the projects.

Debt

We provide guarantees to lenders for our joint ventures which include standard non-recourse carve out indemnifications for losses arising from items such as but not limited to fraud, physical waste, payment of taxes, environmental indemnities, misapplication of insurance proceeds or security deposits and failure to maintain required insurance. For construction and term loans, we may include a guaranty of completion as well as a principal guaranty ranging from 5% to 100% of principal.  The principal guarantees include terms for release based upon satisfactory completion of construction and performance targets including occupancy thresholds and minimum debt service coverage tests. Our joint ventures may contain make whole provisions in the event that demands are made on any existing guarantees. As of December 31, 2016, the maximum amount of joint venture debt guaranteed by the Company is $28.0 million.

24.    Subsequent Events

In January 2016, we sold our outlet center in Fort Myers, Florida located near Sanibel Island for net proceeds2017, the Company's Board of approximately $25.8 million. We estimate the gain to be recognized in the first quarter of 2016 to be approximately $4.9 million. The proceeds from the sale of this unencumbered asset were used to pay down balances outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit.

Deer Park Debt Repayment

In January 2016, we repaid our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which had an original maturity date in August 2018, and our $28.4 million deferred financing obligation, both of which are related to our 749,000 square foot outlet center in Deer Park outlet center. These transactions allowed us to unencumber the Deer Park asset while simultaneously deferringDirectors declared a significant portion of the gains related to the asset sales for tax purposes.

2016 Outperformance Plan

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2016 Outperformance Plan (the “2016 OPP"). The 2016 OPP provides for the grant of performance shares under the Incentive Award Plan of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (Amended and Restated as of April 4, 2014). Under the 2016 OPP, the Company granted an aggregate of 321,900 performance shares to award recipients, which may convert, subject to the achievement of the goals described below, into a maximum of 321,900 restricted$0.325 cash dividend per common shares of the Company based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation and its share price appreciation relative to its peer group, over the three-year measurement period from February 10, 2016 through February 9, 2019.

The 2016 OPP is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients may earn up to an aggregate of 321,900 restricted common shares of the Company based on the Company’s share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) over three years beginning on February 10, 2016. The maximum number of shares will be earned under this plan if the Company both (a) achieves 35% or higher share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid, over the three-year measurement period and (b) is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the three-year measurement period. The Company expects that the value of the awards, if the Company achieves a 35% share price appreciation and is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the three-year measurement period, will equal approximately $12.8 million.

Any shares earned on February 9, 2019 are also subject to a time based vesting schedule. 50% of the shares will vestpayable on February 15, 20192017 to each shareholder of record on January 31, 2017, and the remaining 50% will vest on February 15, 2020, contingent upon continued employment withTrustees of Tanger GP Trust declared a $0.325 cash distribution per Operating Partnership unit to the Company through the vesting dates.Operating Partnership's unitholders.

With respect to 50% of the performance shares (or 160,950 shares), 20% of this portion of the award (or 32,190 shares) will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 18% over the three-year measurement period, 60% of this portion of the award (or 96,750 shares) will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period equals 26.5%, and 100% of this portion of the award (or 160,950 shares) will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 35% or higher.
F-55




With respect to the other 50% of the performance shares (or 160,950), 20% of this portion of the award (or 32,190 shares) will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 40th percentile of its peer group over the three-year measurement period, 60% of this portion of the award (or 96,750 shares) will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 55th percentile of its peer group during this period, and 100% of this portion of the award (or 160,950 shares) will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 70th percentile of its peer group or greater during this period. The peer group is based on companies included in the SNL Equity REIT index.


F-53



The performance shares will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute share price appreciation and for relative share price appreciation amongst the Company's peer group. The share price targets will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period.

24.25.    Quarterly Financial Data of the Company (Unaudited)

The following table sets forth the Company's summarized quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 (unaudited and in thousands, except per common share data)(1). This information is not required for the Operating Partnership:
 
Year Ended December 31, 2015 (1)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016 (1)
 First Quarter 
Second Quarter(2)
 
Third Quarter(3)
 
Fourth
 Quarter(4)
 
First Quarter(2)
 
Second Quarter(3)
 
Third Quarter(4)
 
Fourth
 Quarter
Total revenues $105,926
 $107,736
 $112,906
 $112,801
 $110,805
 $111,333
 $119,137
 $124,559
Operating income 32,900
 36,894
 36,376
 38,291
 34,799
 38,340
 39,875
 38,263
Net income 36,386
 25,359
 46,460
 113,963
 28,617
 77,302
 72,774
 25,636
Income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 34,512
 24,481
 44,075
 108,132
 27,150
 73,417
 69,104
 24,073
Income available to common shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 34,104
 24,173
 43,581
 106,934
 26,856
 72,692
 68,477
 23,793
                
Basic earnings per common share:                
Net income $0.36
 $0.26
 $0.46
 $1.13
 $0.28
 $0.76
 $0.72
 $0.25
 
��
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per common share:                
Net income $0.36
 $0.26
 $0.46
 $1.13
 $0.28
 $0.76
 $0.72
 $0.25
(1)Quarterly amounts may not add to annual amounts due to the effect of rounding on a quarterly basis.
(2)In the first quarter of 2016, net income includes a gain of $4.9 million on the sale of our outlet center in Fort Myers, Florida.
(3)In the second quarter of 2016, net income includes a gain of $49.3 million on the acquisition of our other venture partners' equity interests in the Westgate joint venture.
(4)In the third quarter of 2016, net income includes a gain of $46.3 million on the acquisition of our other venture partners' equity interests in the Savannah joint venture and a $1.4 million gain on the sale of an outparcel at our outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina located on Highway 501.


F-56





  
Year Ended December 31, 2015 (1)
  
First Quarter(2)
 Second Quarter 
Third Quarter(3)
 
Fourth
 Quarter(4)
Total revenues $105,926
 $107,736
 $112,906
 $112,801
Operating income 32,900
 36,894
 36,376
 38,291
Net income 36,386
 25,359
 46,460
 113,963
Income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 34,512
 24,481
 44,075
 108,132
Income available to common shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 34,104
 24,173
 43,581
 106,934
         
Basic earnings per common share :        
Net income $0.36
 $0.26
 $0.46
 $1.13
         
Diluted earnings per common share:        
Net income $0.36
 $0.26
 $0.46
 $1.13
(1)Quarterly amounts may not add to annual amounts due to the effect of rounding on a quarterly basis.
(2)In the first quarter of 2015, net income includes a gain of $13.7 million, on the sale of our equity interest in the unconsolidated joint venture that owned the Wisconsin Dells outlet center.
(3)In the third quarter of 2015, net income includes a gain of $20.2 million on the sale of our Kittery I and II, Tuscola, and West Branch outlet centers.
(4)In the fourth quarter of 2015, net income includes a gain of $86.5 million on the sale of our Barstow outlet center.



F-54



  
Year Ended December 31, 2014 (1)
  First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter 
Fourth Quarter (2)
Total revenues $102,783
 $102,212
 $105,189
 $108,374
Operating income 28,368
 32,625
 35,283
 35,587
Net income 15,440
 19,895
 24,297
 18,520
Income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 14,616
 18,850
 23,003
 17,542
Income available to common shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 14,187
 18,369
 22,522
 17,061
         
Basic earnings per common share :        
Net income $0.15
 $0.20
 $0.24
 $0.18
         
Diluted earnings per common share:        
Net income $0.15
 $0.20
 $0.24
 $0.18
(1)Quarterly amounts may not add to annual amounts due to the effect of rounding on a quarterly basis.
(2)For the fourth quarter, net income includes a $7.5 million gain on the sale of our Lincoln City outlet center and a $13.1 million loss on early extinguishment of debt related to the early redemption of senior notes due November 2015.



F-55F-57




TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESTANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIESSCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands)For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands)
                      
DescriptionDescription   Initial cost to Company 
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition
(Improvements)
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
December 31, 2015 (1)
   Description   Initial cost to Company 
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition
(Improvements)
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
December 31, 2016 (1)
   
Outlet Center Name Location Encum-brances Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
Total 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Date of
Construction or Acquisition
 
Life Used to
Compute
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
 Location 
Encum-brances (2)
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
Total 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Date of
Construction or Acquisition
 
Life Used to
Compute
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
Atlantic City Atlantic City, NJ $46,606
 $
$125,988
 $
$3,127
 $
$129,115
$129,115
 $20,322
 
2011 (3)
 
(2) 
 Atlantic City, NJ $43,286
 $
$125,988
 $
$4,562
 $
$130,550
$130,550
 $24,605
 
2011 (4)
 
(3) 
Blowing Rock Blowing Rock, NC 
 1,963
9,424
 
8,150
 1,963
17,574
19,537
 8,887
 
1997 (3)
 
(2) 
 Blowing Rock, NC 
 1,963
9,424
 
8,586
 1,963
18,010
19,973
 9,496
 
1997 (4)
 
(3) 
Branson Branson, MO 
 4,407
25,040
 396
21,271
 4,803
46,311
51,114
 27,199
 1994 
(2) 
 Branson, MO 
 4,407
25,040
 396
22,145
 4,803
47,185
51,988
 28,592
 1994 
(3) 
Charleston Charleston, SC 
 10,353
48,877
 
13,039
 10,353
61,916
72,269
 23,692
 2006 
(2) 
 Charleston, SC 
 10,353
48,877
 
13,836
 10,353
62,713
73,066
 26,185
 2006 
(3) 
Commerce Commerce, GA 
 1,262
14,046
 707
33,901
 1,969
47,947
49,916
 28,803
 1995 
(2) 
 Commerce, GA 
 1,262
14,046
 707
34,441
 1,969
48,487
50,456
 30,109
 1995 
(3) 
Daytona Beach Daytona Beach, FL 
 
16,699
 

 
16,699
16,699
 
 
(4) 
 
(2) 
 Daytona Beach, FL 
 9,913
80,547
 

 9,913
80,547
90,460
 741
 2016 
(3) 
Deer Park Deer Park, NY 149,155
 82,413
173,044
 
3,448
 82,413
176,492
258,905
 17,564
 
2013 (3)
 
(2) 
 Deer Park, NY 
 82,413
173,044
 
8,281
 82,413
181,325
263,738
 25,010
 
2013 (4)
 
(3) 
Foley Foley, AL 
 4,400
82,410
 693
40,720
 5,093
123,130
128,223
 46,826
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Foley, AL 
 4,400
82,410
 693
42,161
 5,093
124,571
129,664
 50,272
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Fort Worth Fort Worth, TX 
 
19,756
 

 
19,756
19,756
 
 
2017 (5)
 
(3) 
Foxwoods Mashantucket, CT 70,250
 
130,562
 

 
130,562
130,562
 3,338
 2015 
(4) 
 Mashantucket, CT 69,902
 
130,562
 
553
 
131,115
131,115
 8,999
 2015 
(3) 
Gonzales Gonzales, LA 
 679
15,895
 
35,059
 679
50,954
51,633
 27,622
 1992 
(2) 
 Gonzales, LA 
 679
15,895
 
35,055
 679
50,950
51,629
 29,743
 1992 
(3) 
Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, MI 
 8,180
75,479
 

 8,180
75,479
83,659
 1,812
 2015 
(4) 
 Grand Rapids, MI 
 8,180
75,420
 

 8,180
75,420
83,600
 5,978
 2015 
(3) 
Hershey Hershey, PA 
 3,673
48,186
 
2,927
 3,673
51,113
54,786
 8,558
 
2011(3)
 
(2) 
 Hershey, PA 
 3,673
48,186
 
3,430
 3,673
51,616
55,289
 10,633
 
2011(4)
 
(3) 
Hilton Head I Bluffton, SC 
 4,753

 
32,920
 4,753
32,920
37,673
 9,205
 2011 
(2) 
 Bluffton, SC 
 4,753

 
33,351
 4,753
33,351
38,104
 10,936
 2011 
(3) 
Hilton Head II Bluffton, SC 
 5,128
20,668
 
9,728
 5,128
30,396
35,524
 12,864
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Bluffton, SC 
 5,128
20,668
 
10,160
 5,128
30,828
35,956
 14,149
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Howell Howell, MI 
 2,250
35,250
 
11,794
 2,250
47,044
49,294
 20,351
 
2002 (3)
 
(2) 
 Howell, MI 
 2,250
35,250
 
12,006
 2,250
47,256
49,506
 21,633
 
2002 (4)
 
(3) 
Jeffersonville Jeffersonville, OH 
 2,752
111,276
 
7,220
 2,752
118,496
121,248
 18,308
 
2011(3)
 
(2) 
 Jeffersonville, OH 
 2,752
111,276
 
7,668
 2,752
118,944
121,696
 22,437
 
2011 (4)
 
(3) 
Lancaster Lancaster, PA 
 3,691
19,907
 
22,704
 3,691
42,611
46,302
 25,101
 
1994 (3)
 
(2) 
 Lancaster, PA 
 3,691
19,907
 
31,718
 3,691
51,625
55,316
 25,138
 
1994 (4)
 
(3) 
Locust Grove Locust Grove, GA 
 2,558
11,801
 
26,986
 2,558
38,787
41,345
 23,223
 1994 
(2) 
 Locust Grove, GA 
 2,558
11,801
 
27,881
 2,558
39,682
42,240
 24,388
 1994 
(3) 
Mebane Mebane, NC 
 8,821
53,362
 
2,043
 8,821
55,405
64,226
 17,435
 2010 
(2) 
 Mebane, NC 
 8,821
53,362
 
2,971
 8,821
56,333
65,154
 20,087
 2010 
(3) 
Myrtle Beach Hwy 17 Myrtle Beach, SC 
 
80,733
 
6,477
 
87,210
87,210
 23,892
 
2009 (3)
 
(2) 
 Myrtle Beach, SC 
 
80,733
 
6,883
 
87,616
87,616
 26,662
 
2009 (4)
 
(3) 
Myrtle Beach Hwy 501 Myrtle Beach, SC 
 10,236
57,094
 
36,947
 10,236
94,041
104,277
 35,090
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Myrtle Beach, SC 
 8,781
56,798
 
36,998
 8,781
93,796
102,577
 38,241
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Nags Head Nags Head, NC 
 1,853
6,679
 
5,831
 1,853
12,510
14,363
 7,420
 
1997 (3)
 
(2) 
 Nags Head, NC 
 1,853
6,679
 
6,150
 1,853
12,829
14,682
 7,879
 
1997 (4)
 
(3) 
Ocean City Ocean City, MD 
 
16,334
 
7,782
 
24,116
24,116
 4,695
 
2011(3)
 
(2) 
 Ocean City, MD 
 
16,334
 
8,069
 
24,403
24,403
 5,701
 
2011 (4)
 
(3) 
                      



TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESTANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIESSCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands)For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands)
                      
DescriptionDescription   Initial cost to Company 
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition
(Improvements)
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
December 31, 2015 (1)
   Description   Initial cost to Company 
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition
(Improvements)
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
December 31, 2016 (1)
   
Outlet Center Name Location Encum-brances
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
Total 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Date of
Construction
 
Life Used to
Compute
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
 Location 
Encum-brances (2)

 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
 Land
Buildings,
Improve-ments & Fixtures
Total 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 Date of
Construction or Acquisition
 
Life Used to
Compute
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
Park City Park City, UT 
 6,900
33,597
 343
26,379
 7,243
59,976
67,219
 21,138
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Park City, UT 
 6,900
33,597
 343
26,883
 7,243
60,480
67,723
 23,481
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 
 5,528
91,288
 3
12,938
 5,531
104,226
109,757
 39,319
 2008 
(2) 
 Pittsburgh, PA 
 5,528
91,288
 3
13,488
 5,531
104,776
110,307
 44,450
 2008 
(3) 
Rehoboth Beach Rehoboth Beach, DE 
 20,600
74,209
 1,875
35,241
 22,475
109,450
131,925
 40,018
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Rehoboth Beach, DE 
 20,600
74,209
 1,875
45,194
 22,475
119,403
141,878
 43,356
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Riverhead Riverhead, NY 
 
36,374
 6,152
107,799
 6,152
144,173
150,325
 79,440
 1993 
(2) 
 Riverhead, NY 
 
36,374
 6,152
124,490
 6,152
160,864
167,016
 84,127
 1993 
(3) 
San Marcos San Marcos, TX 
 1,801
9,440
 1,548
55,813
 3,349
65,253
68,602
 37,551
 1993 
(2) 
 San Marcos, TX 
 1,801
9,440
 2,301
58,170
 4,102
67,610
71,712
 39,226
 1993 
(3) 
Sanibel Fort Myers, FL 
 4,916
23,196
 
12,585
 4,916
35,781
40,697
 20,383
 
1998 (3)
 
(2) 
Savannah Pooler, GA 
 8,556
167,780
 
1,408
 8,556
169,188
177,744
 1,892
 
2016 (4)
 
(3) 
Sevierville Sevierville, TN 
 
18,495
 
47,298
 
65,793
65,793
 32,958
 
1997 (3)
 
(2) 
 Sevierville, TN 
 
18,495
 
48,469
 
66,964
66,964
 35,187
 
1997 (4)
 
(3) 
Seymour Seymour, IN 
 200

 

 200

200
 
 1994 
(2) 
 Seymour, IN 
 200

 

 200

200
 
 1994 
(3) 
Southaven Southaven, MS 45,824
 14,959
62,042
 

 14,959
62,042
77,001
 447
 2015 
(2) 
 Southaven, MS 58,957
 14,959
62,042
 
5,193
 14,959
67,235
82,194
 4,527
 2015 
(3) 
Terrell Terrell, TX 
 523
13,432
 
9,400
 523
22,832
23,355
 17,199
 1994 
(2) 
 Terrell, TX 
 523
13,432
 
9,681
 523
23,113
23,636
 17,654
 1994 
(3) 
Tilton Tilton, NH 
 1,800
24,838
 29
10,560
 1,829
35,398
37,227
 14,614
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Tilton, NH 
 1,800
24,838
 29
11,249
 1,829
36,087
37,916
 15,767
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Westbrook Westbrook, CT 
 6,264
26,991
 4,233
6,104
 10,497
33,095
43,592
 13,861
 
2003 (3)
 
(2) 
 Westbrook, CT 
 6,264
26,991
 4,233
7,419
 10,497
34,410
44,907
 15,164
 
2003 (4)
 
(3) 
Westgate Glendale, AZ 
 19,037
140,337
 
6
 19,037
140,343
159,380
 2,200
 
2016 (4)
 
(3) 
Williamsburg Williamsburg, IA 
 706
6,781
 719
17,322
 1,425
24,103
25,528
 19,206
 1991 
(2) 
 Williamsburg, IA 
 706
6,781
 717
17,592
 1,423
24,373
25,796
 19,938
 1991 
(3) 
   $311,835
 $223,569
$1,599,437
 $16,698
$673,513
 $240,267
$2,272,950
$2,513,217
 $748,341
       $172,145
 $254,704
$1,967,607
 $17,449
$726,147
 $272,153
$2,693,754
$2,965,907
 $814,583
    
(1)Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is approximately $2.6$3.0 billion.
(2)Including premiums and net of debt discount of and net debt origination costs.
(3)We generally use estimated lives of 33 years for buildings and 15 years for land improvements. Tenant finishing allowances are depreciated over the initial lease term. Building, improvements & fixtures includes amounts included in construction in progress on the consolidated balance sheet.
(3)(4)Represents year acquired.
(4)(5)Under construction.



TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - (Continued)
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
For the Year Ended December 31, 20152016
(in thousands)

The changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 are as follows:

 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Balance, beginning of year $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
 $1,947,352
 $2,513,217
 $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
Acquisitions 
 
 255,107
 335,710
 
 
Improvements 245,391
 160,560
 50,283
 163,187
 245,391
 160,560
Dispositions and reclasses to and from rental property held for sale 4,223
 (146,776) (2,923) (46,207) 4,223
 (146,776)
Balance, end of year $2,513,217
 $2,263,603
 $2,249,819
 $2,965,907
 $2,513,217
 $2,263,603

The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 are as follows:

 2015 2014 2013 2016 2015 2014
Balance, beginning of year $662,236
 $654,631
 $582,859
 $748,341
 $662,236
 $654,631
Depreciation for the period 85,872
 80,057
 74,695
 96,813
 85,872
 80,057
Dispositions and reclasses to and from rental property held for sale 233
 (72,452) (2,923) (30,571) 233
 (72,452)
Balance, end of year $748,341
 $662,236
 $654,631
 $814,583
 $748,341
 $662,236